The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity Council Committees - - 11/10/2020 Approved Kent City Council - Committee of the Whole Committee of the Whole - Regular Meeting Minutes November 10, 2020 Date: November 10, 2020 Time: 4:04 p.m. Place: THIS IS A REMOTE MEETING 1. CALL TO ORDER Council President Troutner called the meeting to order. 2. ROLL CALL Attendee Name Title Status Arrived Toni Troutner Council President Present Bill Boyce Councilmember Present 4:10 PM Brenda Fincher Councilmember Present Satwinder Kaur Councilmember Present Marli Larimer Councilmember Present Zandria Michaud Councilmember Present Les Thomas Councilmember Present Dana Ralph Mayor Present 3. AGENDA APPROVAL A. Move to approve the agenda as amended. Chief Administrative Officer Derek Matheson requested item 4.G be moved to the first presentation 4.A. RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Les Thomas, Councilmember SECONDER: Satwinder Kaur, Councilmember AYES: Troutner, Boyce, Fincher, Kaur, Larimer, Michaud, Thomas 4. DEPARTMENT PRESENTATIONS A. INFO ONLY: Green Stormwater Infrastructure Project Manager Interns for World Relief Seattle and Sustainability Ambassadors, Risa Suho and Elisha Gill, provided a presentation on Green Stormwater Infrastructure in Kent. They discussed the problem areas in regard to flooding here in the City as well as the issue of increased pollution. They followed by discussing possible solutions for these issues, such as glacial till, rain gardens and rain garden soil and paradise parking lots. There were a number of examples from other places such as Bell ingham, Tacoma and other areas in King County that have implemented some form of Green Kent City Council - Committee of the Whole Committee of the Whole - Regular Meeting Minutes November 10, 2020 Kent, Washington Page 2 of 10 Stormwater Infrastructure and the benefits to the rate payers, the City and the environment. B. INFO ONLY: Mill Creek Canyon Clean Up Deputy Parks Director Brian Levenhagen presented an update on the clean up being done at Mill Creek Canyon Park. C. Amendment 2 with Clean Harbors Environmental Services for Mill Creek Canyon Cleanup - Authorize Deputy Parks Director Brian Levenhagen provided details on the Amendment 2 with Clean Harbors Environmental Services for the Mill Creek Canyon Cleanup project. MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to sign contract amendment #2 with Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc. for the continued clean-up of Mill Creek Canyon Park up to a maximum contract amount of $545,000.00, provide that this amended contract value shall be used to determine future authority concerning contract amendments if sufficient funds exist within the City’s overall budget, and ratify all acts consistent with the authority granted by this motion and prior its adoption, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the Parks Director and City Attorney. RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS Next: 11/17/2020 7:00 PM D. 2020 Second and Third Quarter Fee -in-Lieu Funds - Authorize Terry Jungman provided details on the 2020 second and third quarter fee-in- lieu funds. MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to accept $14,250 of fee -in-lieu funds, amend the Community Parks Reinvestment Program budget, and authorize the future expenditure of these funds for capital improvements at Campus Park subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the Parks Director and City Attorney. RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS Next: 11/17/2020 7:00 PM E. Jail Medical Services Agreement - Authorize Commander Diane McCuistion presented detailed information on the Jail Medical Services Agreement. McCuistion provided information on the Request for Proposals received and Kent City Council - Committee of the Whole Committee of the Whole - Regular Meeting Minutes November 10, 2020 Kent, Washington Page 3 of 10 the interview process to select the vendor. MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to enter into a Jail Medical Services Agreement with Healthcare Delivery Systems for an initial five-year term beginning on December 15, 2020, and three options to renew, each for an additional three -year term, in an annual amount not to exceed $628,919, including any Washington State sales tax, subject to terms and conditions acceptable to the Police Chief and City Attorney. RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS Next: 11/17/2020 7:00 PM F. Recycle Surcharge Adjustment - Authorize Public Works Environmental Supervisor Rowena Valencia-Gica gave a presentation on the surcharge increase being requested by the City's contracted hauler, Republic Services. This is due to a new contamination reduction program that is implemented. This program consists of cus tomer education, monthly monitoring and documentation, increased reporting, progressive enforcement, procedures to resume recycling when suspended, enhanced communication and outreach and annual truck inspections and reporting. Valencia-Gica noted that the initial recycling processing surcharge was effective September 1, 2019 and this additional surcharge would cover a surge in residual unrecyclable materials due to increased processing. The cost to a single family would be $0.33/month additional and $2.85/cubic yard per month additional. MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to approve an increase to the sustainability adjustment added to each rate charged by Republic Services for recurring solid waste services pursuant to Amendment #1 to the Garbage, Recycling, Yard and Food Waste Collection and Disposal/Marketing Contract in the amount of $0.33 per month for Single Family and $2.85 per cubic yard per month for Multifamily effective January 1, 2021, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the Public Works Director and City Attorney. RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS Next: 11/17/2020 7:00 PM G. USGS Annual Agreement - Authorize Environmental Engineering Supervisor Alex Murillo presented on the US Geological Survey - Joint Funding Agreement for the operation of stream and river gages. This agreement will provide for operation, maintenance and data collection at eight gages. Two are located on Mill Creek, one on Springbrook Creek, two on Rock Creek, and three on the Green River. Murillo indicated Kent City Council - Committee of the Whole Committee of the Whole - Regular Meeting Minutes November 10, 2020 Kent, Washington Page 4 of 10 that this is an on-going partnership with the City of Kent and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) for stream data collection. The gages provide valuable information on stream and weather conditions, including water surface elevations, flow levels and amounts of precipitation. This information is used to calibrate stream flow models and increase the accuracy of stormwater flood projection models. Murillo noted that new gages are included in the agreement for federal fiscal year 2021 to provide the City additional information along the Green River. These gages will allow us to quickly assess the river levels through the City related to levee elevations. MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to sign a Joint Funding Agreement for Water Resources Investigations between the City of Kent and the U.S. Geological Survey in an amount not to exceed $124,753 subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public Works Director. RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS Next: 11/17/2020 7:00 PM H. INFO ONLY: Transportation Master Plan Draft Project List Senior Transportation Planer April Delchamps presented on the Transportation Master Plan. Delchamps began by reviewing the capital budget numbers and made mention that LID's are a potential financing tool for qualifying projects. As projects are identified to move forward, they will be evaluated for LID potential. Delchamps review the feedback received from the public via interviews, workshops, surveys, webmap results as well as staff feedback. Some additional feedback that was received was regarding pedestrian crossing improvements, pedestrian facilities near schools, pedestrian facilities near transit and intersection and signal improvements to decrease traffic congestion. Delchamps discussed the prioritized/funded projects, projects with secured funding and developer projects, of which there are 93. She also provided information on the Safe Routes to Schools Project as well as the Neighborhood Greenways Projects. Delchamps spoke about the 56 multimodal priority projects which include pedestrian projects, bicycle projects, pedestrian crossing projects, intersection projects and auto projects. Delchamps wrapped up by discussing next steps, to include draft policies and actions which will be presented at the December 1, 2020 Committee of the Whole meeting. Kent City Council - Committee of the Whole Committee of the Whole - Regular Meeting Minutes November 10, 2020 Kent, Washington Page 5 of 10 I. INFO ONLY: Advance Kent Government Performance Coordinator Michael Mage provided the Council with a recap of Advance Kent. He reviewed the available employee webinars and the list of A-Team 2020 Members from various departments across the City. Mage reviewed the available employee webinars that help to support the employee transition to telework. Mage also reviewed a handful of improvement projects across the City and where each one is at, and what next steps are. Along with this he reviewed a few lean tools and how they will help the City reexamine performance measures and metrics to connect the Council Goals with SMART Objectives. Mage closed by discussing next steps in helping to build a culture of continuous improvement at the City. J. 2020 Annual Docket - Approve Planner Kaelene Nobis provided details on the 2020 annual docket. Councilmember Michaud requested the code revision to 15.08.070 be expanded to chickens. MOTION: Approve the 2020 Annual Docket. RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS Next: 11/17/2020 7:00 PM K. Marquee on Meeker/Ethos Phase II Multifamily Tax Exemption Agreement - Authorize City Attorney Pat Fitzpatrick provided background information regarding the Multifamily tax exemption on the former Par 3 site that was purchased by FNW - now Ethos. The Par 3 surplus was initiated to ensure economic viability of remaining portions of the golf course. Numerous public meetings were held to consider the surplus. The City went out with an Request for Proposal for the development of the site and FNW was selected. Fitzpatrick provided details on the August 15, 2017, Development Agreement the City entered with FNW. The property would qualify for the 8-year multifamily tax exemption that would apply to only improvements on the property, not the land. The las was to be developed in phases and the developer is now starting development on Phase II, which is consistent with the Development Agreement. Planner Jason Garnham provided information on the Marquee on Meeker/Ethos Phase II Multifamily Tax Exemption Agreement and explained the purpose of the MFTE program. Kent City Council - Committee of the Whole Committee of the Whole - Regular Meeting Minutes November 10, 2020 Kent, Washington Page 6 of 10 MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to sign the Multifamily Housing Property Tax Exemption Agreement with Marquee on Meeker LLC., subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the Economic and Community Development Director and City Attorney. RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS Next: 11/17/2020 7:00 PM L. Write-offs of Uncollectable Accounts - Authorize Finance Director Paula Painter provided details on uncollectable accounts and indicated these do not affect the City's ability to collect on these amounts. MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to write-off uncollectable accounts owed to the City in the amount of $85,034.25, subject to final approval of the Finance Director and City Attorney. RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS Next: 11/17/2020 7:00 PM M. Lifeline Utility Ordinance Update - Adopt Customer Service Manager Molly Bartlemay presented on the Lifeline Utility Ordinance update. She reviewed the eligibility requirements for those seeking reduced rates. Bartlemay reviewed some minor technical edits that are being made on the ordinance such as updating the Consumer Price Index to Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue area, clarification around name on account and applicant name and the aligning of gross income with the guidelines established by HUD. Bartlemay discussed 2021 residential utility rates and made mention that the City bills for King County sewer charges and that it is not eligible for this discount. She wrapped up her presentation by discussing next steps to include updating the Lifeline application and working to promote the program. Councilmember Kaur requested this program be communicated in multiple languages. MOTION: Adopt Ordinance No. 4374, revising the Kent City Code to change the calculation of lifeline utility rates for water, sewer, storm and surface water drainage, and to make other minor technical changes within those same code sections. RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS Next: 11/17/2020 7:00 PM N. Consolidating Budget Adjustment Ordinance for Adjustments between July 1, 2020 and September 30, 2020 - Adopt Kent City Council - Committee of the Whole Committee of the Whole - Regular Meeting Minutes November 10, 2020 Kent, Washington Page 7 of 10 Senior Financial Analyst Michelle Ferguson provided a presentation on the consolidating budget adjustments between July 1 and September 30, 2020. Ferguson outlines a number of budget increases that are pending approval totaling $2,818,790. Additionally, she reviewed the budget decrease that are currently pending approval totaling $7,200,100 of which $7,186,740 to reflect negative impacts of COVID-19. MOTION: Adopt Ordinance No.4375, consolidating budget adjustments made between July 1, 2020 and September 30, 2020, reflecting an overall budget decrease of $4,338,400. RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS Next: 11/17/2020 7:00 PM O. Payment of Bills - Authorize MOTION: Authorize the payment of bills received through 10/31/20 and paid on 10/31/20 and authorize the checks issued for payroll 10/16/20-10/31/20 and paid on 10/20/20, all audited by the Committee of the Whole on 11/12/20. RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS Next: 11/17/2020 7:00 PM P. Ordinance Adopting the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Plan - Adopt Finance Director Paula Painter provided a brief presentation on the 2021 - 2026 Capital Improvement Plan. She indicated that this plan is a required component of the Growth Management Act and to meet this requirement the City must create a six-year Capital Improvement Plan. This plan outlines the recommended financing methods and projects to meet public facility needs in order to maintain established levels of service. MOTION: Adopt Ordinance No. 4376 amending the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan to include the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program. RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS Next: 11/17/2020 7:00 PM Q. 2494 : Ordinance Adopting the Comprehensive Plan Capital Facilities Element Amenddment for School District Long Range Planner Hayley Bonsteel presented information on the Ordinance Adopting the Comprehensive Plan Capital Facilities Element Amendment for School District Capital Facilities Plans. Kent City Council - Committee of the Whole Committee of the Whole - Regular Meeting Minutes November 10, 2020 Kent, Washington Page 8 of 10 MOTION: Adopt Ordinance No. 4377, amending the City’s Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities Element to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way and Auburn School Districts. RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS Next: 11/17/2020 7:00 PM R. Ordinance Adopting Updated School Impact Fees - Adopt Long Range Planner Hayley Bonsteel presented information on the Ordinance Adopting Updated School Impact Fees. MOTION: Adopt Ordinance No. 4378, amending Section 12.13.160 of the Kent City Code to adjust the school impact fee schedules for the Kent, Auburn, and Federal Way School Districts. RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS Next: 11/17/2020 7:00 PM S. Ordinance Adopting the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Incorporate the Water System Plan into the Utilities Element - Adopt Interim Public Works Director Chad Bieren presented information on the Ordinance Adopting the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Incorporate the Water System Plan into the Utilities Element and advised this is a housekeeping amendment to include the water system plan into the comprehensive plan. MOTION: Adopt Ordinance No. 4379, amending the Utilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan to include the 2019 City of Kent Water System Plan. RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS Next: 11/17/2020 7:00 PM T. Property Tax Substantial Need Resolution - Adopt Finance Director Paula Painter presented on the Property Tax Substantial Need Resolution. The rate of inflation for property taxes due in 2021 is 0.602 percent. Painter indicated that the City must adopt a substantial need resolution in order to receive the full 1% increase as allowed by statute. She also made note that the difference in revenue between the amount of inflation and the maximum 1% increase is $125,452. Kent City Council - Committee of the Whole Committee of the Whole - Regular Meeting Minutes November 10, 2020 Kent, Washington Page 9 of 10 MOTION: Adopt Resolution No. 2019, finding a substantial need exists for purposes of exceeding the rate of inflation and setting the limit factor for the property tax levy for the 2021 budget at the previous year’s property tax levy, plus a one percent increase. RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS Next: 11/17/2020 7:00 PM U. Property Tax Levy Ordinance - Adopt Finance Director Paula Painter provided a brief presentation on the Property Tax Levy Ordinance. She reviewed the property tax assessed valuation and rates for 2020 and the estimated rates for 2021. Should Council adopt a resolution finding that a substantial need exists to increase the pr operty tax levy beyond the rate of inflation, this ordinance will levy an increase in property taxes at 1% over last year’s property tax levy, in addition to increases resulting from new construction, improvements, and adjustments over the prior year. MOTION: Adopt Ordinance No. 4380, levying property taxes for collection during the 2021 budget at 1% over last year’s property tax levy. RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS Next: 11/17/2020 7:00 PM V. Ordinance Adopting the 2021-2022 Biennial Budget - Adopt Finance Director Paula Painter spoke about the 2021 - 2022 Biennial Budget. She reviewed the proposed expenditures for both 2021 as well as 2022 and highlighted a few key expenditures. Painter discussed the Equity Manager position, Economic and Community Development Opportunity Fund, Police Data Consultant, funds for a Co-Responder Program as well as funds for Behavioral Health. Council President Troutner expressed appreciation of councilmember's work on the budget and thanked the departments for their work on this budget. Council President Troutner requested placing this item on Other Business on November 17th City Council agenda. Councilmember Larimer requested the budget reflect that the Human Services Fund allocation for Behavioral Health be specific to Youth. Kent City Council - Committee of the Whole Committee of the Whole - Regular Meeting Minutes November 10, 2020 Kent, Washington Page 10 of 10 MOTION: Adopt Ordinance No. 4381, adopting the 2021-2022 biennial budget. RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS Next: 11/17/2020 7:00 PM 5. ADJOURNMENT Council President Troutner adjourned the meeting. Meeting ended at 6:40 p.m. Kimberley A. Komoto City Clerk Green Stormwater Infrastructure (GSI) in the City of Kent Actively encourage the installation of GSI in the City of Kent to reduce flooding and water pollution. This will be presented using Kent GSI examples, personal stories, and a field study. Who are we? Elisha & Risa, WRS & SA What are the problems? ●Flooding ○East Hill ○Kent Kangley ○Mill Creek School & Creek ●Pollution ○Risa’s neighborhood ○Streets (car oil, litter, organic waste) ○Drains (rivers & creeks) What are the solutions? ●Understanding Glacial Till ●Understanding Rain Garden Soil ●Paradise Parking Plots ●Upcoming Kent-Meridian Rain Garden ●Other cities’ incentives & county policies ●Storm drainage fee reduction ●Pre-existing programs Awareness & Learning Individual Projects Big Impact Incentives & Policies Solutions Understanding components, using Kent examples, city examples, and implementation Understanding Glacial Till Glacial Till- unsorted material directly deposited from glacial ice. Mixture of sand, clay, gravel, silt, etc. Absorbs SOME water but not effective enough to properly mitigate water. Resulting from moving glacier structures Understanding Rain Garden Soil ●Soil Drainage ●Rain garden soil composition is made up of organic matter, sand, silt, and clay. ●Testing soil on site is a must to understand practicality and implementation. When creating a rain garden or many other GSI. Memorial, Santos, et al. Rain Garden Installation Training Guide. 2012. Paradise Parking Plots ❖Rainwater Harvesting ➢4 4,000G Cisterns ➢Taking water from the rooftops ❖Rain Garden ➢Holds and filters rainwater from the parking lot ❖Bioswale to be made ➢Functions the same as a rain garden but more engineered ➢Further mitigating the flooding from Mill Creek Upcoming Kent-Meridian Rain Garden ●Started by Elisha, Risa, and our advisor ●Designed by the club ●GSI can be done by anyone ○Just needs to be encouraged ■Awareness ■Incentives Examples from other places Tacoma: Low Impact Development (LID)Surface Water Rate Reduction based on Best Management Practices (BMP) Bellingham: Homeowners Incentive Program King County: GSI Mini-Grants Stormwater Drainage Fee Reduction Proposal ●Example policy ●Appropriate incentive in creating GSI in relation to reducing impervious surface fees. ●“would benefit the ratepayers, the city, and the environment” Awareness ●Educational Outreach Programs ○Watershed connection programs ○Homeowners association ○Demographics - Public Schools, etc. ●Apartments ○Most of Kent lives in apartments ○Future homeowners ○Highly urbanized areas ○Our students, kids, environment ●City Kent Website ○Policies/plans ○Outreach Programs So what can we do? Encourage the community to invest in GSI Spread awareness of GSI! Incentivizing GSI! Support policies and programs that support GSI! Committee of the Whole, November 10, 2020 Brian Levenhagen Deputy Director Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department 1 Mill Creek Canyon Clean Up 2 Mill Creek Canyon Earthworks Park Mill Creek Canyon Cleanup -Progress Report EARTHWORKS PARKInitial Clean up area •2.25 acres •Steep Slopes •Heavy trash CAMPUS PARK 4 Mill Creek Canyon Cleanup -Before Photos 5 Mill Creek Canyon Cleanup -In Progress Mill Creek Canyon Cleanup -In Progress 7 Initial Clean up totals •Approx. 200 Cubic yards of Trash •70 Shopping carts total •20 days work for a crew of 6 Mill Creek Canyon Cleanup -After Photos Area 2 work wrapping up •Intent is to continue working through the canyon by breaking the work into manageable areas based on conditions on the ground. •City PM will continue to provide daily management and oversight of contractor. •Ongoing outreach with PD and Human Services. •Intend to sign an amendment with Clean Harbors to continue cleanup efforts. •MAINTENANCE! Some clean up funds will be used to hire seasonal staff to regularly walk/clean the canyon in 2021. Mill Creek Canyon Cleanup -Phased Approach Moving Forward Recycling Processing Surcharge & Contamination Reduction Plan Committee of the Whole November 10, 2020 Recycling Processing Surcharge History “China Sword” Commodity values dropped Republic Services’ Response Slowed processing lines Additional personnel Contract Amendment 1.Sustainability adjustment (Surcharge) --annual re-evaluation 2.Contract extended to 2029 3.Removal of contaminants 4.Redefined “contamination” 5.Contamination Reduction Program Contamination Reduction Program 1.Customer education 2.Monthly monitoring & documentation 3.Increased reporting 4.Progressive enforcement 5.Procedures to resume recycling when suspended 6.Enhanced communication & outreach 7.Annual trucks inspections + reportingOoops! tag Initial Recycling Processing Surcharge (Effective Sept. 1, 2019) Multi-family $2.98 per cubic yard per month Single Family $0.96 per month New Recycling Processing Surcharge Multi-family $5.83/cubic yard/month ($2.85/CY additional) Single Family $1.29/month ($0.33/month additional) Rationale Surge in residual unrecyclable materials due to increased processing of recyclables US Geological Survey –Joint Funding Agreement Operation of Stream and River Gages City of Kent Committee of the Whole November 10, 2020 Rock Creek at SR-516 Near Ravensdale Rock Creek Near Maple Valley Clark Springs Watershed USGS Stream Gages along Rock Creek / Clark Springs Watershed USGS Local Stream Gages in the Kent Valley Green River Flows, February, 2020 S. 200th St. Gage Auburn Gage Existing River Gage New River Gage New US Geological Survey River Gages MEEKER STREET BRIDGE S 277TH STREET BRIDGE USGS Stream Gage Data –Green River/South 200th Street S. 196th St 62nd Ave. S.waterdata.usgs.gov/wa/nwis/rt or web search “USGS gages Kent WA” USGS FFY 2021 Annual Agreement Funding Kent Portion -$124,753 USGS Portion -$41,515 Tukwila Portion -$10,863 Total -$177, 131 US Geological Survey –Joint Funding Agreement Operation of Stream and River Gages City of Kent Committee of the Whole November 10, 2020 Committee of the Whole April Delchamps, AICP Senior Transportation Planner November 10, 2020 Capital Project Budget Funding Capital Projects Grants & Appropriations Local Improvement Districts (LIDs) Transportation Impact Fees (TIFs) B&O Tax Capital Budget *LIDs are a potential financing tool for qualifying projects. Funding potential is highly dependent on the project. As projects are identified to move forward they will be evaluated for LID potential Funding Source Low Estimate Mid Estimate High Estimate B & O Tax $ 60,000,000 $ 65,000,000 $ 70,000,000 Transportation Impact Fees (TIF)$ 26,000,000 $ 51,000,000 $ 76,000,000 Grants & Appropriations $ 40,000,000 $ 60,000,000 $ 80,000,000 Local Improvement Districts (LIDs)$ 15,000,000 $ 22,500,000 $ 30,000,000 Total $ 141,000,000 $ 198,500,000 $ 256,000,000 Public Feedback & Project Lists Public Feedback & Project Lists Prioritized/ Funded Projects Capital Budget & Project Funding Interview/ Workshop Feedback, Survey/ Webmap Results, & Staff Feedback Additional Feedback Pedestrian Crossing Improvements Pedestrian Facilities near Schools Pedestrian Facilities near transit Intersection and Signal Improvements to Decrease Traffic Congestion Prioritized/Funded Projects,Projects with Secured Funding, & Developer Projects Prioritized/Funded Projects, Projects with Secured Funding, & Developer Projects •Pedestrian •Bicycle •Pedestrian Crossing (New & Improvements) •Intersection: Signal Timing, New Signals, Auto Capacity, Roundabouts •Auto: Widen to 3 Lanes, Roadway Reallocation •3 Programs: Safety, Safe Routes to Schools, & Neighborhood Greenways Prioritized/Funded Projects: 93 Projects Downtown Subarea Feedback Survey Feedback 1.DSA-3 (James St) •19.7% 2.DSA-11 (Willis St) •17.6% 3.DSA-10 (Central Ave) •14.3% Webmap Feedback 1.DSA-11 (Willis St) •26.5% 2.DSA-10 (Central Ave) •10.8% 3.DSA-2 (James St) •9.6% 4.DSA-6 (W/E Meeker St) •9.6% _ Proposed Prioritized/Funded Projects, Projects with Secured Funding, & Developer Projects • •Plan New/Improved Pedestriar/BicycleCmssing 1 Y� 1 Maintenance with Pedestrian Facilities � - Intersection Improvements (Capacity/ Improvements] 1 Bicycle Facilities C Bridge Replacement with Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities I 1 1 Roadway Reallocation with Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities C Intersection Improvements with Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities 1 Pedestrian Facilities i Roundabout with PedestriarVBicycle Facilities i Widen to 3 Laneswith Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities 0 Plan JJ s Pedestrian}BicycIe Faciliti as Subarea Flokb + : New Roadway with Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities Downtown r ' 0 0.25 0.5 Revised November % 2020 AW(q'JfTUNS PMITION1 TIAPUN � r• i � � I �ler, o-a+ry wry Mlle • R �:Or N /FL24 L14 k xl'`r'•' ''++••, nr7jra % ; C 1, ;j' f 1 orb i.. . �fl i•„ih ii 1 �+ i r MSrxi 1 '{ u 1 .,. . owl.. ¢�o, ...x [r S .i•. ; i .�.$i a C =end aC P-M l C ,.. d .,., R1�'• P-30 P•32 P•34 3 � ; j D-1 P� P-3 5 ■ P-15 �P-2 5FL 36 x P 29 P-27 „ ? `r� _M� .gg �P99r1••� sCt "�, t<s.,,,[,:: The CRtt dKent J'Cite) mmonatte helleve. tilrtmekYlt7 Mk YR¢mation avbhle ' t M1 1 >•. yµ M:w ii for your hspedtlm 6notan Ylhiigement or other Y1aYpan olartlr 9 � � e� „ 1 - Y IDIval Property Fights. To the extenteapWtghth saidhramatCon is held try the h "•'•. "� 3 1 { - city you are heretic pemMteE by the City to copy, dLrVMde, and dherwnse use ;{' r _ 1 • c,<,so-x Ihe YII¢matron with me exception. No me a torm Xmrttea to wi!!Ms •ahon emept n = ax¢tlan¢ Mlll a lyrll6m a7rcemellt 7Yltll the City. ; i-== - ` l='==.+'^'....:: \'-RE''E%- F.WQ-. Et J: - VET E� C` l&> Hxq KwgI.Ld Ha.�cA 17i i i.roxu l Manufacturing and Industrial Center (MIC) Feedback Survey Feedback 1.MIC-6 (S 212th St) •30.2% 2.MIC-2 (S 212th St) •23.85% 3.MIC-4 (S 228th St/83rd Ave S) •13.9% Webmap Feedback 1.MIC-6 (S 212th St) •39.1% 2.MIC-2 (S 212th St) •12.9% 3.MIC-4 (S 228th St/83rd Ave S) •9.6% Proposed Prioritized/Funded Projects, Projects with Secured Funding, & Developer Projects •••Plan Maintenancewith Pedestrian Facilities Bicycle Facilities Roadway Reallocation with Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities Pedestrian Facilities Widen to- 3 Laneswith Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities Pedestriar/Bicycle Facilities New Roadway with Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities New/Improved Pedestrian/Bicycle Croming C' Intersection Improvements (Opacity}Signal Improvement= 0 Bridge Replacement with Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities i Intersection Improvements with Pedestrian/BicycleFacilitiea 9 Roundabout with PedestriardBicycle Facilities 0 Plan R&] Subarea MIC MIC-South 4° e, It i 4 Revised November 8, Z020 "'.r;kX >n�XSPumanrnPusrkxPJv y The City at Kert {'CW) reualahtr heYeves thetm Smq M& v s talxFe IntamaYm awbEk to Your mi s ndt an �y Idmgementor dher violation of my Intdecrlalproperty n*11%. To the extent oopyri* in sad inlarmatlon h. held hY c the CRY Tau are he"Ing Pam R6c1 M the CRY to copy, deArbute, and oterlrtr2 use the mlormatm mU one enuptdn. No me Is peFmF&d to set tt. Ylhhmhatm except 'I IAl„ s In xCardan Ce 1rRh a written agreeaent with the City. i 0 0.25 0.5 s �UYnezry : : Mlle K a f- g Inv a s NE11, el e 2o6,ss, s Y h r �F'-57 arlltl,s. §'e•h•J 71--1 5 Y111h VI P-27 P-50 3.55 ' F x.•'•. f.'f.,rcx E+ � t e i6�,III�Sh .. { r5k,m :�1 _ „ dL _ � Sulu, Sl Jf �'IU•L F'. i'Ra nulal 1 F3 F2 0 0.125 0.23 0.3 - '1<■ F f Af1h Cr S I:I1h kl P-60 'IT x a hell 51 S ns,h sl I „►� ,. ,j e { f — I s.72tlh e — - tas.zemai x � i 1 •all � 1 y r Rd8 3;1!Vl 51 - R d t n K a ' E ' ' nmwl r qyvl m y:.F.E"E%-� hF..: - .., E- E•F-. ' E•. �t-: ' la7tl.hgCykhn [ •3M-�alhGp aart;. .. • p Midway Subarea Feedback Survey Feedback 1.Midway-4 (Military Rd) •42.1% 2.Midway-1 (S 272nd St) •27.4% 3.Midway-2 (S 260th St/S 259th Pl) •25.9% Webmap Feedback 1.Midway-4 (Military Rd) •36.0% 2.Midway-2 (S 260th St/S 259th Pl) •28.0% 3.Midway-1 (S 272nd St) •28.0% Proposed Prioritized/Funded Projects, Projects - M with Secured Funding, & Developer Projects MC] ..Plan x P•S i Maintenance with Pedestrian Facilities P " nWk4F7fTRAX5PpRATION1W1RPUN Bicycle Facilities 81 P-514 6 mr p spa 9nwh.a, Roadway Reallocation with Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities Muth �~ „ R�SYJ W }f $ 24iri al Q.5 wnW d d "a{ N idf Ih YL �; Jan" a # a Pedestrian Facilities a ti ti Wr,1,i::' ; Widen to Lan es with PedestrianlBicycIeFaciIities Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities y 9 P W9r.11 New Roadway with Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities hnl r ID NewlImpraved PedestriarVBicycle Cro-ssing '" °' s:.lfilhb:+ T °4 1 Intersection Improvements (Capacity/Signal Improvements) ��. w lA.+ Bridge Replacement with Pedestrian/BicycleFacilities Yn firulrygl Fuik +� n yr d tl� P`'—NA—low µAwr' ? h524mh91 t � Intersectio-n Improvements. with PedestriarTlBicycleFacilities Q 91601h5' A ' x R 55 y P 29 ` R55 P-2T Roundabout with Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities s,Rg, YYrhv, + Plan Subarea 6212ne sl � 52}iif Pl {; 57'k� I Midway {• 0 0.5 1 _� a �431dPl I, 4 .919o1h Pf Mlle Revised November 9, 2020 s�.+fir.s1 _ F gaJsfi1h91 - 9 7}plh 9: _ a { •.�,r,� g 75'n' 6t ; P-42 I d d 5Owl o- ; 54 00, Sii7" �52 �I93d1 La �a>:kL%U e { x l mm 5l f J x _ 3 yvet Ff '' { K a y Y2A7yar' +.a 10 Ul" I' + �.FIJIA$: C ++ Rd tYPln.f xln - S2zdq PI y 't, 626r'd FI N. cr , I 5;{v x iG1ih 51 „px1 C� 97Atih P1 :drlh 91 _ _ 'adnlerar,IR KSrI i a` 5 H—plon Way R y9 4 j R Wlmv {4..S,, - J 'J 1661h $1 N F4 r'i1 i 4 s ifiAlh 97 P- A a yrnahF .a, K w 82ru1h5; G The CRT of l[ert{'flRy') rcacmatft beYe9'es tlretm>kYlg tll6hfematlon avamh� P-B9 P-70 c Is % p for your YlrpeMm hnotan Y1hilgemerR m athe s W&n of anf Is T $ s YEdectual Property rlghtL To Be extmtwVg*ht Yl said i rmatlan h held by the 5 7: ills sl � ",t a• -I * u° My you arc heetrr peffnMd by the CRy to copy, dkb*tk, and aWerxare use - We Inf rmaThn wft one exception. No we h pemYtted to seathrc ahawahm a r. i -,•1 o E;r.-HgF�.ea Nn.LSOS.Irtzr:{.NCREIdENT P-PRQ—. E , kPp ti- Hxq KOMI.ESA ISorm.ESA ghAaadl.tleCglof j amozdanoe wO a }eRhm agreernent mU the Otf. -'..xr, ,JEWEPCi ' .•=:n' p�$r�iblt<xs-arA ago 916 Lt: Corr"r'N 2Fkd PI Northeast Hill Subarea Feedback Survey Feedback 1.NEHill-5 (132nd Ave SE) •26.8% 2.NEHill-2 (SE 240th St) •22.0% 3.NEHill-4 (116th Ave SE) •15.1% Webmap Feedback 1.NEHill-2 (SE 240th St) •28.3% 2.NEHill-5 (132nd Ave SE) •26.3% 3.NEHill-4 (116th Ave SE) •13.1% Proposed Prioritized/ Funded Projects, Projects �FLM with Secured Funding, &Developer Projects x Pan SE IN 2 Maintenance with Pedestrian Facilities. Bicycle Facilities Roadway Reallocation with Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities Pedestrian Facilities. PI — Widen to 3 La ne5 w ith Ped edr i ar� Bicyrl e Facilities x'2 — PLde5trian�Bicycle Facilities New Roadway with Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities. 0 New/Improved PedLsitrian�Bicycle Crassing C- Intersection ImpruvLments. (Capacity/ Big nal Improvements} 0 Bridge Reo ac ement w ith Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities 0 Intersection Impruvements. with Pedekriar/Bicyrle Facilities C. P-GD R 61 51 7.1141 A K -51111i� 0 Roundabout with Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities n 0 Plan Subarea NEHill FL9 0 0.5 1 q -0 Mile Pro Revised November 9, 2020 U" Q E'll THANSPHTATIONAUR PUNar¢aRG rr rn, ILt;, dr. 4, R7 '[tH r A —npl -P 2241k �1 11L. I' h d Z # st ::inn r 5: M., A P Pd-1 I IP Nh 4 14h lt—tj: 51 The CAV ot)&t 1'Cirty') -anmia3 R cvs that makinq th5 thatin �k 1h nq t1b. t �n intaratian ai%mlatble for your nsp�ton 6 notan intrinqanent OFOthff mLTtp3n otany nM1:c=J prop" —1ri lights. To tlhe extent o3protit in &W inlorm Mom shell by by I to the Ot? Wair are hereby penniliki by tire City to o3py, dtWitnute, and dtherorm um Me intorrinatur witir one PL 29 li,N�J I I I � el r R 5 L fX �pton.W�eapemftt!db3�gtlhmmErmaWnacep except t t a q 7•JuN.- I L, tie in Nance with L3 written agreement with the CRY. P ,P_0.5 N P UV I ji Y *0,,� V�fl 4RE. GZr ilt, UMS. Mrl;A 1,KREhErfT P. NRC.:P.. Egi 'EU. ESA Mim HON "J, ESA KofeLIM !�-PIZ �J. NO�' U Southeast Hill Subarea Feedback Survey Feedback 1.SEHill-8 (SE Kent- Kangley Rd) •26.2% 2.SEHill-3 (SE 256th St) •13.63% 3.SEHill-1 (132nd Ave SE) •19.2% Webmap Feedback 1.SEHill-3 (SE 256th St) •62.1% 2.SEHill-1 (132nd Ave SE) •9.5% 3.SEHill-2 (SE 248th St) •8.7% 26 The City at re nt;'Clty') reasana hh' he llePes that Inak mis thR �g ' Irtormakan awdahk tar Vac mspectan is not an SJ 4S ,.. _.-.- {L�5 + , . :74l,n „EUl ii Irtnnge,ne nt a r other violation at any mteii! Wal pmpent' s sx"" �iu,.q Min k. nghts. To the extelR oapyrpht in said mhrmatlan is held by the Cityyau are he reby per in Rt!d by the C lty to copy, dlstnhut,, and atherHlse use the lnbrinatan with ane Rr �` '•a':� enceptan. Na one is peon RYd to sell thx "i3nnatan except , _ _ x In axartlance wlth awntten aq rceme nt wnh the Clty. + RP r naiR ^$„ ["'v• 'na. � rr-ri,i � Sr"' � 19= •da. a F`';y j d„ _ G : Y •l AN , :pV$ ..1 �• «< .,w ;sl ; f, Ii� X'W,. �'M IhS,..-1 ii - IF ii.i al,rx t i,ln, •lfl 1 " re:5ny rt _ Rf21 , sl u rn, s.. _ •• R _ - r x..s.� pr lr„u Proposed Prioritized/Funded Projects, Projects L with Secured Funding, & Developer Projects Flan ' Maintenancewith Pedestrian Facilities P-93: Bicycle Facilities Roadway Reallocation with PedestrianlBic;cle Facilities Pedestrian Facilities Widen to 3 Lanes with PedestriarVBicycle Facilities 3! Pedestrian}BicycleFacilities "•. P-1¢ New Roadway with PadestriardBicycle Facilities x,:ln. { b C _ i rls• o rr Nevi/Improved Pedestrian} Bicycle Crossing »> „ir.� _17 P-80 r.aa - C' Intersection Improvements (CapacityjSignal Improvements) Bridge Replacement with PedestrianJBicycle Facilities fit.•, sW x „t:r.,:q Intersection Improvements with PedestriarVBicycle Facilities 3." I - dl7nl.,5 iK - ID Roundabout PedestriarVBicycle Facilities I with I,• R 3 a 10 Plan r+rlrn , ;[.,SiH r Subarea SEHill vl ,f u.k 1�y��y�r�y' 0 0.5 11•�I��1y,/��'1/��y/jgT1]►��y�J �a 'S Mlle ar, �, ri :dLhh u ., { E h• VV✓ 1f V VISBd M4V@fbBf g+ 2020 PLUM MUPONTMONMEN: RAN .l65.IfftE.FHj,PrRCr.EAJao.dEii.EsiCicGrtl x,ir,: A.HaPxE,M. tAP.IEOK.E-l9=1iteWtisnawrrrryd :[,rn.iSvwcSa6nEc:1 , k Safe Routes to Schools Projects Greenway Projects Safe Routes to Schools Projects & Greenway Projects •Safe Routes to Schools Projects •Current List based on public feedback and discussions with local School Districts •Further Evaluation planned to identify other critical projects •Projects to be prioritized for funding in the Safe Routes to Schools Program •Neighborhood Greenways Projects •Neighborhood Greenways Plan on the prioritized project list •Current list based on public outreach and serve as the starting point for the Planning effort f, VAN OP/ 3- '.)[Alt:. Safe Route to School Projects & Neighborhood G reenway Projects It New/Improved Pedestrian/Bicycle Cros5ing Intersection Improvementswith Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities Pedestrian Facilities .7 Pede5trian/Bicyclel'acilities: Subarea Downtown 0 4 = MIC F - - Ir. �1!dh P, MIC-South Midway NEHill SEHill 7 U11-14H TFMANTATIMMERPffi 0 0.75 L.5 .kill W Mile S2ar9s s Ramsed November 7, 202D J. Kmi 3 sr si,m: 3 as,,,. 11 EL AO % -TbUhl the CRY alKent E'CM:h"j remwaMy Mbaves Not making th z 71! ;.'A Al adermaticin aoftbk lar ymf inspedmin a nd an stAnqemen a; either wRiabdri d my InOilledhiall pinaperty "t;. 7b the extent copyright en said vio�tion 6kid by be y t the CRY Yau are temly pein&ted by the City bo o*y, daknibute, and otherwm 4sc the r5onnabori with one cc!ptiam. No one tS permftd to seb M in(unnatun except in accoManoe wV a wotb!n speffmat wft the CAW. Ew. HE;1' C3 z. L: Ki �c wTPVi-F "E- E! tbwKaNJ.EAWEWIM1.143M'cl Next Priority Projects •56 Projects •Multimodal: •Pedestrian Projects •Bicycle Projects •Pedestrian Crossing Projects (New & Improvements) •Intersection Projects: Signal Timing, New Signals, Auto Capacity, Roundabouts •Auto Projects: Widen to 3 Lanes, Roadway Reallocation, Railroad separations Next Priority Projects a Plan New/Improved PedestriardBicycle Crossing i r' Bicycle Facilities ' Intersection Improvements (Capacity/Signal Improvements) +. Pedestrian Facilities Bridge Replacement with Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities Widen to 3 Lanes with Pedestrian/Bic'fcle Facilities Intersection Improvements with Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities If Roundabout with Padestrian/Bicycle, Facilities New Roadway with Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities Railroad Grade Separation y a �� r,,tir Subarea t 0 Mile 0,5 QSA '4.,,r.•• ,. Mile Revised November 9, 2020 iliY r(hen TRbNSPhkTATION N1ASiER PUN 54 14-22 14-23 55 1 b 1 nn.�a 1 r k , , •Hirt , � .ter r i r ^'_fi ai it 7 _'ry') reahana a.: ;:.cues that makm7 the rnlarmat an avarohe � .ajr lnwectxm spat an lnlrmgemeI ar other tnotathn at arty a xtuai property rAdit'ra the atentcopyrphtin mid Inhxmmion c held by 7nr. 4 .na are hemtry yemMietl by the City to ray. dr&M the, and athernsc use iNrruk tton w t one ex=533i. 83 one t yemwttetl to of thz mM matMn apm x. . .=drnae With a,xdtm a9memmt xM the M. 3••••^USUS. Nd,-z:, SYMEMET F, hR-2., ....• ••r� r . . '.^a"GPE Lkv Next Priority Projects Tie CAy orKent JTOW) rw onabtr belleY that md[hg this • • Subarea itmmatlan "ahk kr yalr nsfectan Lc nut an Plan New/Improved Pedestrian/Bicycle Crossing Irtmgement urother tlabtlsn atany hteleefiml p.P.M rldlh. To the extent mPNhht in said Y,tmmatlon h held by Bicycle Facilities C. Intersection Improvements (Capacity}Signal Improvements) MIC INcity YOU ar IheFdYFrnttkdbythe city tacapr, ' daUEute• and dtherwke use line In mmatlon Mh one Pedestrian Facilities Bridge Replacement with Pedestrian/BicycleFacilities MIC-South ex Man.NoaehpentltedtasatlhYtm,natlonexomt In avoidance Mh a written agreement MU the txy. Wiidento3LaneswithPedestrian/BicycleFacilities Intersection Improvements with Pedestrian/BicycleFacilities Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities Roundabout with Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities } New Roadway with Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities Railroad Grade Separation A, 0 0.25 0• Revised Novembar 9, 2020 T 4J L� Mile lJl"��kX 1RINSPOAfAIILfiN1�TERHAN s 5 MM sI- t 20, 2101h 5? -28 N-29 5 iaLeh GI 4•N. lmi 571Jtli In C1--V'r-A , _ 3111 d, 9[ r h r,,1L PI n,: ,., +i•:1 s2111h PI -32 -34 $ c': 1 511Sn dL $ Jni1Y C 651'i Ih SI Y 4 9 N } e, 5 d s o- a• . SE13Ih1h P .p j ilhp , SiV„ 57161h SL r °il Llh j; 4 0 5 � � � 511tl1h 4 a 111'rIh5 w r 4R i v Ril rai Yl' a G l .:iM-n4•I' S Y E —11 �1r Y 71J $E w—'.Jn, V.4 ,s` 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 a i d 8a}nI f hs1 { MIIes n S y SY11�1Ar ' 8 -- Yvlory rr ' l `r YMnG 51 '�`NvluiG 1:+ � b i 5 iiGt151 Y I i i r i21?ili �I 4 G . ��4 1�11 - i 57G]nJg; :1L>aJ51 51281h FI rap- I 1h4k 5527i.1:14' { n n4 $P1n55 - E b u nwlY.: Eo.xr.. Es'. FE tiE J { L:3: E'. _E 1-F. f1FC.• y 146h,Oft :1}S'S - "r..xca E'.'FETE-3:...,L_�_I'x...z:, A IME L'E U F. Wa,. E7. J, Y:,:'E C o`T%Vo s,{ctic 13 L:c i _ r. 7 }.Y,,, :v[^{ 31;UseP ....1}[f Next Pr lot! ty Projects i0, Plan Bicycle Facilities '71 An rip PIT TaNSPONATION WTIN PIAN pedestrian Facilities Widen to- 3 Lanes with Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities E New Roadway with Pedestrian/ Bicycle Facilities E!,, 11 New/Improved Pedestrian/Bicycle CraGsing Intersection Improvements (D3lpadty/Signal Improvements) Bridge Replacement with Pedekrian�Bicycle Facilities P61t1d N Intersection Improvements with Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities 1 sir fIj r-:Am. Raundabout with Pede5trian/Bicycle Facilities Fuik Updd 4-1 7 Railroad Grade Separation Subarea MlhS' YOM 51 MAI Midway r E N V1 A SK N-1,3` 0 0.5 1 Mile Revised November 9, 2020 'P, -C DIM Ln L x 2S.6t Pf ,4 q 784ph Pi 81 r"I cc 11.rrpipn WAY E 2wh 51 13 40 4: 2 fUlh S; The MatlrenR{'txy'j remsandle thebwei; tiat im akmq th 6 intao n aimb h i! H 36 1-39 for YM1; F inWecbm not an intmincemint a other mbilft n at art/ 0 it 1iftftzl leprapeirty Fiqhtk Ta the extent cap Habit in said mkrmn atia in a lhdd by t he I 6 Mild 11 City you arc herethl pennnitted by the CRY t3 caliV, dishhhuft, Ind atheirwim use 1he kniminnabInin wift we exMition. U3 one m pew0ed to w. this intaminnaban a pt in E�. 41i Oz - , U=13= I "'= a I %1-ME'-E SP F. NR.---. Ew jzx�Off.V-J'cr.rcKoNi, Ea F�.Ea NgOr—W accordance with a written agreement eement wthe City. .5 EO tx f 71r7 Pi x,r•� a or, .� - + " ; 1 , r % WIc„:a The CRW aftent POW) remonatk Wheves thatm>r[hG the r - s ifmmalm aWMk tar your rnspedron k not m if clawntar ache YkWt1z at my hteledual propeft . ,'*'sl 1 xnn •{ 0'1 rl$& Th the eAent omyyi$t in said hlonmttan k Mid by he CRy Tou me hereby PernMEed M the CRV to oXy. 7. tC _= F dMitu and athernhe use the hhnnabm Wn ane suss 1 eaoeptnn. No one iL per Rkd to seh thk inhwatm exlsept in afsca raance with a •n%m agmement with the OtI. ..r. s - a .1 ;X-A, rt er..dri •¢. d'° - Y .. ^ _ -� •.:3u r u g 1 { u em s` a 7 st;o , si}�ar. N 9 xi N B Jr;'jnw cA srv,�ns• Next Priority Projects ... Plan- I'F fi a Bicycle Facilities ^ '. =wN :❑r,, eiti,,, s[aa,, R "I'N Pedestrian Facilities Widen to 3 Lan eswith Pedestrian}Bicycle Facilities Pedestriar/BicycleFacilities y�¢ian,, u:r}r„ V. New Roadway with Pedestrian/Bicycle FacilitiesKE New/Improved Pedestrian/Bicycle Croming ► i s sk 1! C Intersection Improvements (Capacity/Signal Improvements. 1 N. 1 C Bridge Replacement with PedestriarVBicycle Facilities 1 •d :vrnrr'r i P ,_; �" , ""•' �.` Intersection Improvements with Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities 1 e 4' 1 np y i x [ Roundabout with Pedmtrian/Bicycle Facilities Railroad Grade Separation 3 i Subarea NEHiII 1: za „r ..,..R 0 0.5 w# ��N aa}ins-- Cuay� D-11 Mile . •Revised November 9, 2020 .IIhRSP9Af7�1WfiXtUT��s 'So-uf�EoAIrt r:{rNCREhEWPr RQ....E:dJ:W...MEii.EwiChic Hor,Via^pl-EoA1{s.E:A?�Fc°I:rcl-hk3CG?cl9 • The CRV at bent j'01tf1 Feswatily bailievas that m A inq this f T bitYMNOF EM111111ble tar VOUF mspectian & ndt t mitiralpertF O*Mqamn OF dMff VE&bZ 01 any telleck h$tL. T3 the eAeFit oXTFi$t v raid :11mmeittim % b!1d by 5 IN 0 1he Cfty you me ihemtrg paumitted by the Cft ta copy, I ........ 11 i : 1 I - ute� and atkFwM ust Me inl3nnab3n with ame C sl� H-4 7 R. a)ceMn. Na One IL permRiled to Ulk inhunzibm eK=t - ; C le: in =rdmce wn a wnglen acim,.nl �n Me CrL,). niiAW Kwd ' 4 are t;j S7 —A 41 E p- -111, 51 F -43 N 3 r nhs- A! :1111 Pi sr:— tp x 51 7:1 —,1.51 % S 51 Next Priority P roj ects % Dian Bicycle Facilities Pedestrian Facilities N \ 1, Widen to 3 Lanes with Pede5triarVBicycle Facilities3� C Pedestria n/ Bicyr I e Faciliti es New Roadway with Pedestrian/ Bicycle Facilities 7 New/Improved Pedestriar�Bicycle Crowing L Intersection Improvements (Capacity/Signal Improvementm-) d �r� M-1 51 Bridge Replacement with PedestriarVBicycle Facilities Intersection Improvements with Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities n,51MkI Roundabout with PedekriarVBicycle Facilities Railroad Grade Separation leZrnn Zrit pi N Subarea rldSEHill "RIG. 0 0.5 11- Mile Revised November 9, 2020 U1 r.t RHI TUNANTATIM NMER FUN F. WC-, E, - J E" :rbE Kot.'.E: "K0 E:-' 'T-c LN!. 'C! Next Steps •Draft Prioritized Projects •Incorporate City Council Feedback •Transportation Advisory Board Workshop November 19th •Cultural Communities Board Workshop November 24th •Kent Bicycle Advisory Board Workshop November 30th •Develop Project Funding Sources •Continue to Refine Project Descriptions •Refine Cost Estimates •Present Prioritized Projects -December 1st Committee of the Whole •Capital Budget •Estimate Transportation Impact Fees and Local Improvement Districts (LIDs) Funding •Proposed Capital Budget •Policies & Actions •Draft Policies & Actions •Present Draft Policies & Actions -December 1st Committee of the Whole advancekent Advance Kent: 2020 Update Committee of the Whole: November 10, 2020 1.Recap: Advance Kent 2.Lean Training •A-Team 2020 Members •Employee Webinars 3.Improvement Projects •Lean Problem Solving •5 Projects (Work In Progress) 4.Performance Measures •Strategic Plan (Current State) •Next Steps Presenter: Michael Mage, LSSBB Government Performance Coordinator Human Resources Dept. Lean in Washington State •Lean is a methodology for process improvement and organizational development. •Washington State has led public-sector improvement efforts since 1980s. •Lean practitioners come from state, tribal, local government, and the private sector. •Kent is among the smallest cities with a full-time Lean position and program. Guiding Principles Enterprise Alignment ∙Continuous Improvement ∙Cultural Enablers Increase Value to the Customer ∙ Measure what Matters ∙ Identify and Eliminate Waste Results Lean Tools Tools ∙Methods ∙Mindset Adapted from the Shingo Model (2019) Empower People in the Process ∙ Lead with Humility ∙ Make Regular Improvements Culture Focus on the Process ∙ Align Strategy and Systems ∙ Standardize the Work Systems Adapted from the Shingo Model (2019) Advance Kent Model A-Team: 2020 Members Dept.Name HR Michael Mage (Chair) Finance Kathleen McConnell Finance Susanne Shaw Admin Katy McKee ECD Matt Gilbert IT Jenn Graff PW Ops.Levin Conway PW Eng.Catherine Crook Parks Ron Lashley Police Scott Rankin Courts Ida Matias Legal Adam Long Objectives: “to support continuous improvement and performance measure efforts throughout the City.” •Chartered team in Nov 2019. •12 members from each department. •Began in-person meetings in Jan 2020. •Moved to virtual meetings in March. •15+ team meetings focused on Lean training and improvement projects. Employee Webinars Creating Organizational Efficiencies •2 sessions offered •20 total attendees Five Lean Tools for Navigating Uncertainty •2 sessions offered •20 total attendees Make Meetings More Productive •2 sessions offered •37 total attendees •Support employee transition to telework, provide training resources, and explore tools. •Brainstorm potential efficiencies moving from in-person manual to electronic workflows. •Identify training and knowledge gaps for further follow-up. Lean Problem Solving Questions to be asked… •Why is change needed? •What is the problem? •What does success look like? •What are the root causes? •What are potential counter-measures? •What are some lessons learned? •How do we standardize success? Tools to be used… •Process Map (current/future) •Project Charter •Waste Identification •Root Cause Analysis (RCA) •Voice of the Customer (VOC) •TEAMS Metrics •SOP Document Example: Process Map (Current State) Phase 4: Internal Signatures (Detail) Dept.Project Current Achievements Next Steps Parks Internal Electronic Contract Routing Process •Created current-state process map. •Defined process variables, manual steps and rework loops. •Demonstrate internal pilot-test of routing software in Parks and share lessons learned for Citywide process. ECD Permit Center Electronic Application Intake Process •Created current-state process map. •Identified areas for further analysis. •Plan future sessions with Permit Center to decrease intake time. Finance Improving Drainage Charges with GIS Analysis •Aerial analysis expected in early 2021. •Identified five interdepartmental process hand-offs to be improved. •Formalize project for ELT review and implementing improvements. PW Ops Fleet Communication and Consultant Project •Engaged Fleet customers early. •Consultant completed interviews. •Review early data and criteria for evaluating vehicle replacement. HR/Parks CARE Employee Resource and Advisory Group •Provided two sessions in October with 47 total employee participants. •Schedule out future “Brave Space” sessions and topics for Nov. and Dec. Improvement Projects Council Goals (The Why ) Citywide Objectives (The How) Departmental Operations (The What) Inclusive Community Sustainable Services Evolving Infrastructure Thriving City Goals Innovative Government Departmental Operations ActivitiesActivitiesActivities Projects Projects Performance Measures (reporting) Comprehensive Plan (infrastructure) Citywide Strategic Plan (objectives) Performance Measures Currently: Updating existing metrics for 2021-22 Budget Book Performance Measures 2020 •Update metrics for 2021-22 Budget Book. 2021 •Work with ELT to connect metrics to Council Goals with SMART Objectives. •Use A-Team members to support improvement and performance efforts. •Formalize improvement processes and launch virtual Lean toolkit. •Continue to build a culture of continuous improvement at the City. Next Steps Michael Mage · Government Performance Coordinator · Human Resources Lifeline Utility Ordinance Update Committee of the Whole November 10, 2020 Molly Bartlemay Customer Service Manager 253-856-5206 Agenda •Program Eligibility •Minor Technical Edits •Rate Structure Change •What’s Next? •Questions Lifeline Program Eligibility Required for all •Household income cannot exceed the low-income limits set by HUD •Principal place of residence Must meet ONE of the following •Over the age of 62 or •Unable to work due to total and permanent disability or •Providing care to a child with a total and permanent disability AND Minor Technical Edits •Update the name of the Consumer Price Index to Seattle-Tacoma -Bellevue area •Clarify the utility account should be in the name of the applicant •Align gross income with the guidelines established by HUD 2020 HUD Income Limits $0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000 $120,000 $140,000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8Annual IncomeHousehold Members Very Low Income Low Income Rate Structure Change •Proposed discount rate: •60% discount to city water and sewer charges •90% discount to drainage charges •Rationale: •More consistent with our neighboring cities •Closely matches our current Lifeline rates •Keeps Lifeline rates sustainable •Ease of managing the program 2021 Residential Utility Rates Utility Standard Rates Proposed Lifeline Rates Current Lifeline Rates Drainage $13.16 $1.32 $0.92 City Sewer $25.69 $10.28 $12.70 Meter Charge 5/8” or 3/4” $24.94 $9.98 $13.10 Meter Charge 1” $39.05 $15.62 $13.10 Usage First 8 Units $2.59 $1.04 $0.61 Usage Units over 8 $5.09 $2.05 $0.61 Lifeline Customer Example All Services Utility Current Lifeline Rates Proposed Lifeline Rates Drainage $0.92 $1.32 Sewer $12.70 $10.28 Meter Charges $13.10 $9.98 Water Usage 13 Units $7.93 $13.52 Monthly City Charge $34.65 $35.10 Month Including Water Usage Lifeline Customer Example All Services Base Month –No Water Usage Utility Current Lifeline Rates Proposed Lifeline Rates Drainage $0.92 $1.32 Sewer $12.70 $10.28 Meter Charges $13.10 $9.98 Monthly City Charge $26.72 $21.58 Lifeline Customer Example Sewer/Drainage and Drainage Only Utility Current Lifeline Rates Proposed Lifeline Rates Drainage $0.92 $1.32 Sewer $12.70 $10.28 Monthly City Charge $13.62 $11.60 Utility Current Lifeline Rate Proposed Lifeline Rate Drainage Only*$2.76 $3.96 *Residential drainage only customers are billed quarterly What’s Next? •Update the Lifeline application form •Work to promote this program •Highlight Lifeline changes in the City’s annual rate brochure •Work with Communications to promote/advertise the program Questions? Consolidating Budget Adjustments between July 1, 2020 and September 30, 2020 Committee of the Whole November 10, 2020 Budget Adjustment Overall decrease of $4,338,400 Previously Approved Increase of $42,910 Pending Approval Increase of $2,818,790 Decrease of $7,200,100 Committee of the Whole 11-10-2020 Previously Approved Total of $42,910 $24,660 for King County Sex Offender Grant $18,250 for WASPC Traffic Equipment Grant Committee of the Whole 11-10-2020 Budget Increases Pending Approval $2,818,790 $680,750 for the YMCA project $680,750 transfer out of CRF and use of $680,750 in the project, totaling $1,361,500 $675,000 for the Fleet Fuel Island project $425k transfer out of CRF and $250k transfer from the Fleet Fund and use of $675k in the project, totaling $1.35m $33,000 use of IT Tech Plan funds for the Business License Payment Integration project $27,090 use of sewer project funds on a new Sewer Relining project $12,000 for the Shops Parking Lot Security project $12k transfer out of Utility Operating Funds and use of $12k in the project, totaling $24k $23,200 to reflect year-to-date actual rebates in the Kent Events Center Operating Fund Committee of the Whole 11-10-2020 Budget Decreases Pending Approval $7,200,100 $13,360 to budget Sound Transit positions fully in project $7,186,740 to reflect negative impacts of COVID-19 Salaries & Benefits Supplies & Services General Fund 3,308,760 2,305,700 Special Revenue Funds 778,880 17,410 Capital Project Funds -50,000 Enterprise Funds 127,100 69,670 Internal Service Funds -529,220 Total 4,214,740 2,972,000 Committee of the Whole 11-10-2020 Questions? 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Plan Ordinance No. 4376 -Adopt Committee of the Whole November 10, 2020 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Plan •Required component of the Growth Management Act –passed by Washington State Legislature in 1990. •To meet this requirement, the City creates a six-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). •The plan states the recommended financing methods and projects to meet public facility needs in order to maintain established levels of service. •The CIP is adopted by ordinance and updates the City’s comprehensive plan. •The first two years of the plan (2021 and 2022) are included in the biennial budget. Committee of the Whole November 10, 2020 Property Tax Substantial Need Resolution Resolution No. 2019 –Adopt Committee of the Whole November 10, 2020 Property Tax Substantial Need •The rate of inflation (IPD rate) for property taxes due in 2021 is 0.602 percent. •The rate of inflation is the percent change in the implicit price deflator for personal consumption as published by the Bureau of Economic Analysis by September 25th. •The City must adopt a substantial need resolution in order to receive the full 1% increase as allowed by statute. •The difference in revenue between the amount of inflation and the maximum 1% increase is $125,452. Committee of the Whole November 10, 2020 Property Tax Levy Ordinance Ordinance No. 4380 -Adopt Committee of the Whole November 10, 2020 Property Tax Assessed Valuation & Rate Committee of the Whole November 10, 2020 City of Kent Share Only 2020 2021 Est Assessed Valuation in thousands (A)$22,850,453 $24,208,017 General Levy Rate ($2.325 max) (B)1.37812 1.34695 Estimated Cost On: Median Home Value (C)$525 $539 (C) 2020 median home value is $381,000, per King County Assessor's Office. 2021 is estimated to increase by 5%. (A) Assessed valuation for 2021 is estimated to increase by 5% (B) 2020 Levy Rates per King County Assessor's Office 2021-2022 Biennial Budget Ordinance No. 4381 -Adopt Committee of the Whole November 10, 2020 2021-2022 Proposed Expenditures Committee of the Whole November 10, 2020 2021 Proposed Expenditures 2022 Proposed Expenditures General Fund 107,185,870 110,755,450 Special Revenue Funds 49,996,770 45,397,330 Debt Service Funds 8,063,080 8,140,960 Capital Projects Funds 21,011,000 17,227,820 Enterprise Funds 109,178,520 121,471,770 Internal Service Funds 44,477,370 45,556,000 Total Gross Budget 339,912,610 348,549,330 2021-2022 Highlights Committee of the Whole November 10, 2020 2021 Expenditures 2022 Expenditures Equity Manager 243,790 218,420 ECD Opportunity Fund 300,000 300,000 Police Data Consultant 50,000 Co-Responder Program 100,000 Youth Behavioral Health 200,000