HomeMy WebLinkAbout1727Resolution No. 1727
["Beginning August 1, 2004"]
CFN = 961 -Growth Management Act
Passed -7/5/2006
Countywide Planmng Pol1cy Amendments-2006
RESOLUTION NO. /7 ;_ 7
A RESOLUTION of the City council of the city of
Kent, Washington, regarding K1ng County Countywide
Plannmg Pol1c1es adopted by the Metropolitan K1ng County
Counc1l that would add acreage to the City of Kent's
Potential Annexation Area and would designate South Lake
Un1on as an Urban Center.
RECITALS
A. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.210, the Growth Management Act requires
the adoption of Countywide Planning Polic1es to prov1de a countywide framework from
which local comprehensive plans are to be developed. Kmg County, the City of
Seattle, and the Incorporated suburban cities and towns in King County established a
process for the development, adopt1on, and ratification of Countywide Plannmg
Policies by an mterlocal agreement. Th1s agreement established the Growth
Management Planmng Counc1l (GMPC), a group cons1stmg of elected offic1als from
Kmg County, suburban Cities, and the City of Seattle, who were authonzed to develop
a set of recommended countywide plannmg polic1es for cons1derat1on by the Kmg
County Council.
B. The GMPC met on September 21, 2005, and voted to pass
amendments to the Countywide Plannmg Policies, amendmg the mtenm potential
annexation areas map to add 30.3 acres to the Potential Annexation Area of the City
of Kent and des1gnatmg South Lake Un1on an Urban Center. (GMPC Mot1on 05-1 and
1 Countywide Planning
Policy Amendments-2006
05-2). The King County Council approved and ratified these amendments on behalf of
Kmg County on Apnl 24, 2006, pursuant to Kmg County Ord1nance 15426. The Kent
Planning & Economic Development Committee reviewed these amendments at 1ts
meetmg on June 19, 2006.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CilY COUNCIL OF THE CilY OF KENT,
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
RESOLUTION
SECTION 1. -Amendment The City of Kent, act1ng pursuant to the mterlocal
agreement among King County, the City of Seattle, and Incorporated suburban c1t1es,
hereby rat1fies the proposed amendments to the Countywide Plann1ng Pollees as
adopted by the Metropolitan King County Council in Kmg County Ordmance 15426,
attached hereto.
SECTION 2. -Public Inspection. The amendments to the Countywide
Planning Pol1c1es adopted herem shall be filed w1th the City Clerk and placed in the
planning services office so they are available for 1nspect1on by the public.
SECTION 3. -Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence,
clause or phrase of th1s resolution IS declared unconstitutional or Invalid for any
reason, such dec1S1on shall not affect the validity of the remam1ng port1ons of this
resolution.
SECTION 4. -Effective Date. Th1s resolution shall take effect and be in force
1mmed1ately upon its passage.
PASSED at a regular open public meeting by the c1ty council of the City of Kent,
Washington, this ~ day of July, 2006.
2 Countywide Planning
Policy Amendments-2006
CONCURRED in by the mayor of the city of Kent this _£_day of July, 2006.
ATTEST:
4~<iGc~ BRENDAJACOBE~CrrY RK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~..w~~ ...........
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No.
17~ 7passed by the City council of the city of Kent, Washington, the ~day of
July, 2006.
P \Ovi~RESOWTION\CoontywldePiannlngPollcyAmend-2006 doc
3 Countywide Planning
Policy Amendments-2006
KING COUNTY
Signature Report
April 24, 2006
Ordinance 15426
1200 Kmg County Courthouse
516 Thrrd Avenue
Seattle, WA 98104
Proposed No. 2006-0074.1 Sponsors Constantine
1 AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the
2 Countywide Planning Policies; amending the interim
3 potential annexation areas map and ratifying the amended
4 Countywide Planning Policies for unincorporated King
5 County; and amending Ordinance I 0450, Section 3, as
6 amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 and Ordinance 10450,
7 Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.1 0.040.
8
9
10 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY:
11 SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings:
12 A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth
13 Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012 -Countywide Planning
14 Policies (Phase I) in July 1992, under Ordinance I 0450.
15 B. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase II
16 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994, under ~rdinance
17 11446.
Ordinance 15426
I8 C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on September 21, 2005 and
19 voted to recommend amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies,
20 amending the interim potential annexation areas map as shOwn in Attachment A to this
21 ordinance and designating South Lake Union an Urban Center as shown on Attachment B
22 to this ordinance.
23 SECTION 2. Ordinance I 0450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are
24 each hereby amended to read as follows:
25 Phase II.
26 A. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning
27 Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted.
28 B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
29 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment I to Ordinance 12027.
30 C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
31 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment I to Ordinance 12421.
32 D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
33 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments I and 2 to Ordinance 13260.
34 E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
35 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments I through 4 to Ordinance 134 I 5.
36 F. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
37 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments I through 3 to Ordinance 13858.
38 G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
39 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment I to Ordinance 14390.
2
Ordinance 15426
40 H. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
41 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment I to Ordinance 14391.
42 L The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
43 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment I to Ordinance 14392.
44 J. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
45 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment I to Ordinance 14652.
46 K. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
4 7 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments I through 3 to Ordinance 14653.
48 L. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 20 12 -Countywide Planning
49 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment I to Ordinance 14654.
50 M. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
51 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14655.
52 N. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
53 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments I and 2 to Ordinance 14656.
54 0. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
55 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 14844.
56 P. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning
57 Policies are amended as shown by Attachments A, 8 and C to Ordinance 15121.
58 Q. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
59 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15122.
60 R. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
61 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15123.
3
Ordinance 15426
62 S. Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning
63 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments A and B to Ordinance xxx.
64 SECTION 3. Ordmance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 are
65 each hereby amended to read as follows:
66 Ratification for unincorporated King County.
67 A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance l 0450 for the purposes
68 specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.
69 B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance
70 l 0840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.
71 C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance
72 II 061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.
73 D. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning
74 Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of
75 unincorporated King County.
76 E. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
77 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the
78 population of unincorporated King County.
79 F. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
80 shown by Attachment I to Ordinance 12421, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
81 population of unincorporated King County.
82 G. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
83 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
84 population of unincorporated King County.
4
Ordinance 15426
85 H. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
86 shown by Attachment I through 4 to Ordinance 13415, are hereby ratified on behalf of
87 the population of unincorporated King County.
88 I. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as
89 shown by Attachments I through 3 to Ordinance 13858, are hereby ratified on behalf of
90 the population of unincorporated King County.
91 J. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
92 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
93 population of unincorporated King County.
94 K. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Plannmg Policies, as
95 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
96 population of unincorporated King County.
97 L. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as
98 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
99 population of unincorporated King County.
I 00 M. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as
I 0 I shown by Attachment l to Ordinance 14652, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
102 population of unincorporated King County.
I 03 N. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as
104 shown by Attachments I through 3 to Ordinance 14653, are hereby ratified on behalf of
105 the population of unincorporated King County.
5
Ordinance 15426
106 0. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
107 shown by Attachment I to Ordinance 14654, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
108 population of unincorporated King County.
109 P. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
110 shown by Attachment I to Ordinance 14655, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
111 population of unincorporated King County.
112 Q. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
113 shown by Attachments I and 2 to Ordinance I4656, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
I 14 population of unincorporated King County.
I I 5 R. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as
116 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance I4844, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
117 population ofunincorporated King County.
118 S. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as
119 shown by Attachments A, B and C to Ordinance 15121, are hereby ratified on behalf of
120 the population of unincorporated King County.
121 T. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
122 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15122, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
123 population of unincorporated King County.
124 U. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
125 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15123, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
126 population ofunincorporated King County.
6
Ordinance 15426
127 V. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies. as
128 shown by Attachments A and B to Ordinance xxx, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
129 population of unincorporated King County.
130
Ordinance 15426 was introduced on 3/6/2006 and passed by the Metropolitan King
County Council on 4/24/2006, by the following vote:
ATTEST:
Yes: 8-Mr. Phillips, Mr. von Reichbauer, Ms. Lambert, Mr. Dunn, Mr.
Gossett, Ms. Hague, Ms. Patterson and Mr. Constantine
No: 0
Excused: I -Mr. Ferguson
KING COUNTY COUNCIL
KING COUNTY, WASHI!)IL,i+O
....
.r. .. ) ..,
l Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council -n
:.t'i-
-.,-, -. -~
APPROVED this~ day of (h._~
\
• 2006.
r) . )
c:
-:z:
·'
Attachments A. Motion No. 05-1 and Map, B. Motion No 05-2 and Map
7
""" = = = ::c
-~ ::<
I w
"'
·-
N
-~ ,-.)
rr1 ,--.
\. >
r·"1
/ ·-.
~n
0
This page intentiOnally left blank.
15426
~·006-074
9/21/05 Attachment A
Sponsored By: Executive Commtttee
/pr
1 MOTION NO. 05-1
2 A MOTION to amend the interim Potential Annexation Area
3 map in the Countywide Planning Policies.
4
5
6
7 WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policies LU-31 and LU-32 anticipate the collaborative
8 designation of Potential Annexation Areas (PAA) and the eventual annexation of these
9 areas by cities.
10
11 WHEREAS, the attached P AA map amendment corrects an error on the interim P AA map
12 by deleting a 30.3 acre area from the CityofTukwila's PAA and addmg tills area to the
13 City of Kent PAA.
14
15 WHEREAS, the attached PAA map amendment is supported by the CityofTukwila and
16 the CityofKent.
17
18 BE IT RESOLVED TIIAT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCll.. OF
19 KlNG COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS:
20
21
22 I. Amend the Interim Potential Annexation Area Map by including the 30.3 -acre area in
23 the Potential Annexation Area of the City of Kent
24
25 2. This amendment is recommended to the Metropolitan King County Council and the
26 Cities of King County for adoption and ratification.
27
28 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on
29 September 21, 2005 in open session and signed by the chair of the GMPC.
30
31
32
33
34
Ron Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council
- 1 -
N +
n..,..,__........., __ ...., ....... ~ .... ..,,.r....._ .. ...,_._..,,_, __ _.,......., .. ..,.,._..
...._. -lf..oot c-., --... __ .. _ -
·-----~ -~--""'' ~-....... _. ,..,.., ... __ 4_....__ .a.,.r ...... , ............ ~_ ... _______ .._ __ -
~-..-~a.. ... -.. -......._ .. -........... -----·4 ... ........._ __ .. _ .. ..,. ,.. ........ _.
....._ ___ io,.,.wooo~--.o.,_-,__., ... ,......
I 000 2 000
F..C
Proposed Amendment
Interim PAA Map Amendment
D Proposed IVea
lnrorpor;,tP.d Areas
®
K"'g County
15426 2v06-074
9/21/05 Attachment B
Sponsored By: Executive Committee
/th
MOTION NO. 05-02
2 A MOTION to amend the Countywide Planning Policies by
3 designating the South Lake Union area of Seattle as an Urban
4 Center. South Lake Union is added to the list of Urban
5 Centers following Countywide Planning Policy LU-39.
6
7
8
9 WHEREAS, a goal of the Growth Management Act is to encourage development in Urban
10 Areas where adequate public facilities exist or can be provided in an efficient manner;
11
12 WHEREAS, Policy LU-39 of the Countywide Planning Policies of King County describes
13 the criteria for Urban Center designatiOn;
14
15 WHEREAS, Policy LU-40 of the Countywide Planning Policies of King County describes
16 standards for planned land uses within Urban Centers;
17
18 WHEREAS, the City of Seattle has demonstrated that South Lake Union meets the criteria
19 for designation as an Urban Center; and
20
21 WHEREAS, King County Comprehensive Plan Policy U-I 08 supports the development of
22 Urban Centers to meet the region's needs for housing, Jobs, services, culture and recreat;on
23 and to promote health.
24
25 BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF
26 KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS.
27
28
29 I. The South Lake Union area of Seattle is designated as an Urban Center. The list of
30 Urban Centers following Countywide Planning Policy LU-39 is modified to include
31 South Lake Uruon.
32
33 2. This amendment is recommended to the Metropolitan King County Council and the
34 Cities of King County for adoption and ratJilcation.
35
36
- 1 -
•
15426
1 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on
2 September 21, 2005 in open session and s1gned by the chair of the GMPC.
3
4
5
6
7
Ron Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council
- 2 -
-· ___ _
•
' ' . I •• •'l 1 •
t --
'-t:. ,__:;.....:;; __ ~ .-. ''
-..1. : l-' . ·:----~
i'
'I
l!~---.
-__ J
' ___ . __ -:
Upto-.,;nl
Seattle Center·
Urban Center
:--.,
i ·i i L
--·--~ I ~
I ----.
' ' ,,
I
'
·;
Oty of 56ttle -DPD
Hay 19, 1005
r • ~:I
·---1
! _ _,.
'· -·' l
f
\
:\
I
'
__ ,
~--} _, ~
,---r-
15426 2006-07 4
South Lake Union Boundaries
,.. -
-'
'
•
--t . ' . '
. I I . ; .l . !'---• . ' I ,' , .• _,..
'--Jr-·:
'' -1 '
,.
l_,. __
-~_! ' -.... .-
--r : ... : ·-j
' ,. I . j ~---. -
, __ .l -·-
. . y_
D
Lake Union
t.
i
' ' I '----'
-~ .... .----
l 1 r I
i
~.
'f
I' ~-~-"
Do~to~n Se~ttle · un;..;. Cent"r
' E
' ! ~--!
''
..
t-----
~ ---
l -
·-
,.
' -
i:
',
I -~--,
/ -.
-, '
,_ .
•! '-~-
.... ., -· _/_
10 ....
S -:t·;t ililu ~
~ c;P.;_toi Holl. ·
Urban .Center
.. , ,_ .
'
Parcels
\ ' ' ' .
I 1 i 1
-I ,..1 '·
I j Urban Center Boundary
-Park