HomeMy WebLinkAbout1627------------------------ -
RESOLUTION NO. /6J 7
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of Kent,
Washington, ratifying the King County Countywide Planning
Policies adopted by the Metropolitan King County Council
and pursuant to the Growth Management Act.
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A.210) requires the
adoption of Countywide Planning Policies by the legislative authority of King County, and
that said policies are to provide a countywide framework from which local comprehensive
plans are to be developed; and
WHEREAS, King County, the City of Seattle, and the incorporated suburban
cities and towns in King County established a process for the development, adoption, and
ratification of Countywide Planning Policies by an interlocal agreement, which was
approved by the City of Kent, and that said interlocal agreement established the Growth
Management Planning Council (GMPC), a group consisting of elected officials from King
County, suburban cities, and the City of Seattle, who were authorized to develop a set of
recommended countywide planning policies for consideration by the King County Council;
and
WHEREAS, the GMPC recommended a set of Countywide Planning Polices
to the King County Council that were adopted pursuant to its Ordinance No. 10450 on July
6, 1992, as required by RCW 36.70A.210; and which furthermore were ratified by the Kent
City Council pursuant to Resolution No. 1326 on September 15, 1992; and
1
Countywide Planning
Policy Amendments -Ratify
------------
WHEREAS, King County has adopted and the City of Kent has ratified
Phase I and Phase II of the Countywide Planning Policies, including amendments ratified
pursuant to City of Kent Resolution Nos. 1413, 1459, 1484, and 1573; and
WHEREAS, the GMPC met on the dates specified below and voted to pass
additional amendments to accomplish the following:
1. On September 27, 2000, to amend the Urban Growth Boundary map
to reflect land use map amendments adopted during the 2000 King
County Comprehensive Plan update;
2. On October 24, 2001, to amend the Countywide Planning Policies
and the Urban Growth Area to reflect the resolution of the City of
Snoqualmie's joint planning area in support of the Snoqualmie
Preservation Initiative;
3. On December 11, 2001, to add maps of existing Urban Separators to
the Countywide Planning Policies; and
WHEREAS, the King County Council approved and ratified these
amendments on behalf of King County on June 17, 2002, pursuant to King County
Ordinances 2002-0131,2002-0132, and 2002-0133; and
WHEREAS, the Kent Planning Committee reviewed these amendments at its
meeting on August 20, 2002; and
WHEREAS, the Kent Planning Committee recommended that the City
Council ratify the County's amendments to the Countywide Planning Polices, the Urban
Growth Boundary map, and the Urban Growth Area; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
2
Countywide Planning
Policy Amendments -RatifY
SECTION 1. The City of Kent, acting pursuant to the Interlocal Agreement
among King County, the City of Seattle, and incorporated suburban cities, hereby ratifies the
proposed amendments to the Countywide Planning Polices, the Urban Growth Boundary
map, and the Urban Growth Area as adopted by the Metropolitan King County Council
pursuant to King County Ordinances 2002-0131, 2002-0132, and 2002-0133, attached
hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION 2. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies, the
Urban Growth Boundary map, and the Urban Growth Area adopted herein shall be filed with
the City Clerk and in the Planning Services office and made available for public inspection.
JPassed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington this
L day of A~~· 2002.
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY
3
of Kent, this f day of
,,.,s,.-./~
"' ········ ... · ' .. · ··. / ~ • • 4L-
< l \'ZY a-s·· .. -:.. . ~'"""'/ . e ''I \ •
o ~I !"' • "~· ~th'rt,:n~c~.: ., . . "
' ·.. ..· ~ ".
I •e •' ~ .., It 1 I. I I !""
Countywide Planning
Policy Amendments -Ratify
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. /~.if, passed
by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, the ~ day of
,dorf'--r;,~ ' 2002.
P \CJvJI\ResoluttOn\CountywJdePianmngPohcy-Rahfy doc
4
Countywide Planning
Policy Amendments -RatifY
EXHIBIT ''A''
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
KING COUNTY 1200 Kmg County Courthouse
516 Third Avenue
Seattle, WA 98104
Signature Report
June 18, 2002
Ordinance 14390
Proposed No. 2002-0131.1 Sponsors Hague
AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the
Countywide Planning Policies amending the urban growth
area of King County to reflect site specific land use map
amendments adopted during the 2000 comprehensive plan
update; ratifying the amended Countywide Planning
Policies for unincorporated King County; and amending
Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C.
20.10.030 and Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended,
and K.C.C. 20.1 0.040.
COPY ~~-;;~~:Q;l
AUG 2 6 2002 I
Kent City Attorney
----1
12 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY:
13 SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings.
14 A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth
15 Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012-Countywide Planning
16 Policies (Phase I) in July 1992, under Ordinance 10450.
1
Ordinance 14390
17 B. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase II
18 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994, under Ordinance
19 11446.
20 C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on September 27, 2000, and
21 voted to recommend amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
22 Policies [5/25/94], amending the urban growth area boundary to reflect site specific land
23 use map amendments initiated by King County during the 2000 King County
24 comprehensive plan update.
25 SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are
26 each hereby amended to read as follows:
27 Phase II. A. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide
28 Planning Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted.
29 B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning
30 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027.
31 C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
32 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421.
33 D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
34 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment I and 2 to Ordinance 13260.
35 E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
36 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415.
37 F. The Phase IT Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
38 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858.
2
Ordinance 14390
39 G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
40 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to this ordinance.
41 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 are
42 each hereby amended to read as follows:
43 Ratification for unincorporated King County. A. Countywide Planning
44 Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes specified are hereby ratified on
45 behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.
46 B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance
4 7 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.
48 C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance
49 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.
50 D. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning
51 Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of
52 unincorporated King County.
53 E. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
54 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the
55 population of unincorporated King County.
56 F. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as
57 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
58 population of unincorporated King County.
59 G. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
60 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
61 population of unincorporated King County.
3
Ordinance 14390
62 H. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as
63 shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415, are hereby ratified on behalf of
64 the population of unincorporated King County.
65 I. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
66 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858, are hereby ratified on behalf of
67 the population of unincorporated King County.
68 J. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
4
Ordinance 14390
69 shown by Attachment 1 to this ordinance, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population
70 of unincorporated King County.
71
Ordinance 14390 was introduced on 3/18/2002 and passed by the Metropolitan King
County Council on 6/17/2002, by the following vote:
Yes: 11 -Ms. Sullivan, Ms. Edmonds, Mr. von Reichbauer, Ms. Lambert, Mr.
McKenna, Mr. Constantine, Mr. Pullen, Mr. Gossett, Ms. Hague, Mr. Irons
and Ms. Patterson
No:O
Excused: 2 -Mr. Phillips and Mr. Pelz
ATTEST:
Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council
APPROVED th1s _a]_ day of ~
KING COUNTY COUNCIL
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Attachments I. GMPC Substitute Motion No. 003
5
::J:.
z
(."")
()
0 c::;:o ::z:r-
~1""'1
-<_-:",<U
0~
0 c: ::z:: ~
:"""
r.:l
C)
C)
r.:l
'--c
'Z
N
CX>
3:""
:X
0 :
--Ail rn
0 rn
< rn
Q
09/27/00
Sponsored By: Executive Committee
/be
Substitute MOTION NO. 00-3
2
3
4
5
A MOTION to amend the Urban Growth Area of King
County.
6 WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A.110 requires
7 counties to designate an urban growth area or areas within which urban growth shall be
8 encouraged and outside ofwhich growth can occur only if it is not urban in nature; and
9
1 0 WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policy FW -1 Step 8 recognizes that King County may
11 initiate amendments to the Urban Growth Area; and
12
13 WHEREAS, the King County Executive and the Metropolitan King County Council
14 requests the Growth Management Planning Council consider the attached amendments to
15 the Urban Growth Area for eventual adoption by the Metropolitan King County Council
16 and ratification by the cities; and
17
18 WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policies LU-31 and LU-32 anticipate the collaborative
19 designation of Potential Annexation Areas and the eventual annexation of these areas by
20 cities. The attached amendments are supported by the affected city.
21
22 BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL
23 OF KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS:
24
25 I. Amend the Urban Growth Area as designated by the Urban Growth Areas Map in the
26 Countywide Planning Policies as described by the following attachments:
27
28 Attachment A: Issaquah Highlands/Issaquah (KCCP 2000 Map Amendment I)
29 Attachment B: Maple Valley Library/Maple Valley UGA (KCCP 2000 Map
30 Amendment 3)
31 Attachment C: Jenkins Creek Park/Covington UGA (KCCP 2000 Map Amendment 4)
32 Attachment 0: Mahler Park/Enumclaw UGA (KCCP 2000 Amendment 6)
33 Attachment E: Split Parcels/Enumclaw UGA (KCCP 2000 Map Amendment 7)
34 Anachmem F: Carnation UGA (KCCP 2000 Map Amendment 8)
35 Attachment G: Maple Valley (KCCP 2000 Map Amendment 11)
-1 -
14390
II
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2. Amend the Interim Potential Annexation Area Map by including any additional
unincorporated urban land created by these UGA amendments in the Potential
Annexation Area of the adjoining city.
3. Per the Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Attachment A: Issaquah
Highlands/Issaquah (KCCP 2000 Map Amendment I) is not subject to ratification.
Attachments B, C, 0, E, F and G are recommended to the Metropolitan King County
Council and the Cities of King County for adoption and ratification.
ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County the
21" oj S~ 2()()() and signed by the chair of the GMPC in open session in
aulhentication of its adoption Ibis &tf"' 1~ :2PJm.
()V Ae_~
~wth Management Planning Council
Attachments: September 19,2000 Background Report describing each proposed UGA
change and its rationale
Map of each recommended UGA Change
- 2 -
14390
September 19,2000
Proposed UGA Changes Under Review by King County
Background:
As part of the first major update to the King County Comprehensive Plan (K.CCP), a number of
proposed UGA changes are under review by King County. In the Executive Recommended
KCCP 2000 Plan (March 1, 2000), there are 7 recommended changes proposed. Ofthese, five
are requests made by the cities of Carnation, Covington, Enumclaw and Maple Valley. The
other two incJude UGA adjustments to recognize the Grand Ridge Joint Agreement (Issaquah
Highland) and to reconcile two properties that have been split by the UGAjust outside ofthc
City ofEnumcJaw. The proposed UGA amendments are noted on the attached Locator Map.
The proposed amendments are currently under review by the King County Growth Management
and Unincorporated Areas Committee. The amendments are subject to change and may be
amended by the Committee and by the full Council in September 2000. The purpose of
presenting the proposed UGA changes to the GMPC is to highlight those that will require further
action by the GMPC to amend the Countywide Urban Growth Area boundary.
Below is a matrix that describes the property, the acreage affected and the rationale and policy
basis for the proposed UGA change. Amendment# 1, Issaquah Highlands/Issaquah is consistent
with FW-1 and does not require ratification by GMPC as stated in the policy. The remaining
amendments are being presented to the GMPC for consideration and approval as amendments to
the Countywide Urban Growth Boundary. The rationale statements includes an analysis of the
proposed I JC.A amendments with the Countywide Planning Policies.
MAP LOCATOR APPROXIMATE RATIONALE ACRES
NUMBER/PROPERTY REDESIGNATED
TO URBAN
# 1 Issaquah Highlands/ 40 The parcel is a rural island surrounded by the
Issaquah UGA. Approximately 33 acres of the parcel are
identified in the Grand Ridge Joint Agreement
as an expansion area for the Issaquah Highlands
development. The remaining 7 acres will be
protected as an urban separator. The proposed
amendment complies with CPP policy FW-1
step 8(b) which recognized the Issaquah Joint
Planning Agreement process. This is an
information item only and no further action is
needed by GMPC on this amendment per CPP
FW-1.
#3 Maple Valley 0.5 This is a technical adjustment to reconcile the
Library/ Maple Valley UGA line with the corporate city boundary.
UGA The entire property has been annexed by the
City ofMaple Valley, although a portion of the
property falls within the designated Rural Area.
I \~mpc\mot•on~\mohonOO-3-anachmenll do~ l'a~e I
14390 i
i
---APPROXIMATE MAP LOCATOR ACRES RATIONALE
NUMBER/PROPERTY REDESIGNATED
TO URBAN
#4 Jenkins Creek Park/ 65 The City of Covington has requested amending
Covington UGA the UGA in order to provide urban services to
Jenkins Creek park (20.34 acres) afier it is
transferred to the city. The proposed UGA
change includes redesignating the properties
directly north (6.48 acres) and south (38.18
acres) of the park land as Urban. Redesignation
of these properties to Urban would eliminate
the creation of Rural islands after the transfer of
the park.
The City has also expressed an interest in
annexing the Urban island south of the City
boundary (SR 516) but is prevented from doing
so because these lands are not connected to the
UGA. The proposed UGA change for this
portion ofthe UGA will respond to the request
by the City and will better connect an existing
urban island with the UGA.
The proposed UGA amendments in this subarea
comply with CPPs LU-26 (d) and LU-32.
#6 Mahler Park/ 28 The State of Washington has transferred
Enumclaw UGA ownership of Mahler Park to the City of
Enumclaw. The City has requested an
amendment to the UGA in order to provide
urban services, such as police and maintenance,
to the park.
This amendment complies with CPP LU-32.
#7 Split Parcels/ 7.9 This amendment resolves two parcels currently
Enumclaw UGA split by the UGA Jine. A middle school campus
is being constructed nearby and sewer lines can
be made available to the subject properties.
The urban portion of the two properties are in
the City of Enumclaw's Potential Annexation
Area.
This amendment complies w1th CPPs LU-26 (a)
and (d) and LU-38 (d) and (g).
L\gmpc\mouons\mouon00-3-atlachment I doc Page2
14390
MAP LOCATOR APPROXIMATE RATIONALE ACRES
NUMBER/PROPERTY REDESIGNATED
TO URBAN
#8 Carnation UGA 2.5 This is a technical adjusbnent to the UGA
requested by the City of Carnation to recognize
the 1993 annexation of lht: :subjt:cl par\:t:l by Un~
City. State law allows cities to annex city
owned land that is contiguous to the city•s
boundary.
# 11 Maple Valley 26.5 The County is negotiating with the City of
Maple Valley to sell a parcel of County owned
land. adjacent to the city for use as a park ( 19.8
acres). The City has requested amending the
UGA boundary in order to provide urban
services to the park.
The UGA boundary is also proposed to be
changed for the privately owned parcel (6.7
acres) north of the park land. This property is
split by the current UGA boundary and with the
sale ofthe land to the south to Maple Valley.
this property would be entirely surrounded by
the City of Maple Valley. It is proposed to be
redesignated Urban to elimate creation of a
rural island.
The proposed UGA boundary amendment in
this subarea complies with CPP LU-32.
I \gmpc\motJons\motiQ!l()()· )-attachment I doc Page3
14390
11
N
Recommended 2r~' UGA Changes
Locator Map
® King County Issaquah lfiQhlands llssilquall 7 Splil Partels I Erundaw UGA
OOES Oepwtrnenl "' OevekJpmtnl lnd EtiWt:INMnlal Servlcf'l -----I Tllla map Is -....... plamlng purpooes ,.., -I 3 Maple Valley llnry I Maple V*t UGA 8 Camalion UGA
~ not guaranteed to shOW accurate measurements_:
5 0 5 Mill's 4 Jenldns Creelc Park I Covinglnn UGA 11 M<JI)IeV'JIIeJ
1 3 1
~1,200GA...-""'~-~-~,.. 6 Mahltt' Park I Enurn<Dol UGA
-~r-r-;;:--··-··-··-··-.··-··-··-··-··-
I
'r .
!
\.-./ /
... .... .
I
'•-\. "'-~, ..,.....__ '
----------. --~----------_'_.s_ . .,.r._._--_,._· ~----~~-~--. -~/~. -~-'-\_j
14390 I
· Issaquah Highlar1s /Issaquah UGA 1
Executive Recommended Land Use
March2000 2002 131
Attachment A to Motion 00-3 # \ • • t999UGABwndary CO CorrmerdaiOulsideofCenters
ug UrbM Residential, generar
® King County N 2000 lJGA Boundary rr Rural Residential
~-..... ----f ~..........,. .......,...., _.. Ftrestry
1\ I~~~'!:' .r:.. ~ "==·=.:nd I • lrmporated Areas m Mining £-4 500 o 500 Feet • gb Gleenbelt/lllban Separata
N ,......,. .... Fk ""-d ... flp4edlo ..... lljllllDGIII _ _.._........,.~ ....
14390
1V1ap1e vauey Llorary 1 1v1ap1e vauey Ut:JA 3 Executive ReLummended UGA
March2000
Attachment B to Motion 00-3 2 0 0 2 1 3 1
-__ J
® King County
~-----.....,.,~~--By-.
lllllo ........ ~-... paonmg -only ond 1 .. 11111--111 ...... -..,......-.
500 0 500 Feet
f"_L ,. __ --
r / I
-! -I
/
\ ~ 1999 UGA Boundary # •
N 2000 UGA Boundary
-Incorporated Areas
14390
Jenkins Creek P2 '\ I Covington UGA +
Executive Recommended Land Use
March2000
Attachment C to Motion 00-3
\ # 1999 UGA Bollldary ~P~~~.U1
I l._
/ .
'·
, .
IV 2000 UGA Boundary
-lnwporaled Areas
/
ug
rr
OS
Rtral Residential
King County <Nined
Open Space/Recreation
'' ' : '
;
--,-----.. ----,·--~--
ff·
/
\..-,. ------
' _....·.~ ' \_ - -~
• _ _,-1 -.. ' --_-::</
.· .•'',/
-·, /''-
·-
,.
.·· . / /.: ,-·-
/
> /
/ ' /
,// '
·'-.
/ / .
l4ii~O
Mahler Park ' ~numclaw UGA b
Executive RecqJalJlJJMnded Land Use
Attachment D to Motion 00-3 , \ • 1999 UGA Boundary rx Rum! City UGA
N 2000 UGA Boundary
rr Rural Residential
® King County ag ~~aiPovolapmolf .... E--Agriajture
~-..-...,._
~ I Tbla ...... '" -... plllmlng """""'" I1Mt """ I IIIII lnoorpaated tveas op OCher Part I VWdemess Is nol giBinloed ID-_._ _,.._ .
500 0 500 Feet
N ,...., .. ,. .... ~ ......... .....,__ ...... _~_ ....... 2002 1 31
--]\, ll---~-=H I .,
___ jTL______ P--J I ~1------l
I ,f----------~----~-4_ . , ~-==----___ -------:-------· ·-----·! r--/--------· T·-·-y----------~-~ . ____ _1_ ____ ~ 1--------------
!. --------·; -~i,,, //_.// _j ~ I, ll=l _____ _
I I / .. -,, II -----~· ,k-·-·--·1 . I _./ I 'L ,,
: f-I --~ 1 / ~·,/ 1---~-------i _j L -.. ---~ rl---~' ::--/ J ,. j j ------·---~ 't ----------;----------1 I· ' I ,r=:-c_-,:,_. ----, ~--:' l
. -------j I ·---------I' f
I ' I
op
J<f
_rr
. I
-!-rx .L.; :
:! --·
i
J '
14390
Split Parcels ' ~=numclaw UGA
Executive Recommended Land Use
l-
Attachment E to Motion 00-3
® King County
~ ~"lloYolapmod """--.....,.,~----I Tilt& mop .. -lor piiMing ~ only _, _lonol_..,.....lll ____ .
500 0 ' 500 Feet
N ,..._,,a. "" ""'"""' ................ ¢ I _ ...... _........-_ ...
rr
--------------___________ j
rx
March2000 2002 131
~ . # ~ 1999 UGA Boundary rx lbaiCilyUGA
N 2000 UGA Boundaly
-lnoorpaated twas
'--------1~---
k I I~ I -----,·~--~ !
I I I
I 1 : ' ~--------------i
~--------------{
i I -------r--------L -----------
rx 1------
I I :.----~--.... I ~ -------
---------l 'Th _j lj ; rrl i ~-T
I ' . ' I il: I ,:-j N,Yi j !
-------L--------------,.u _ i _ I l.sE.4141hSL_j_ _ _;_ _ : '/;7 i r I I ' . . . -__ l -------_I ---___ _j, L.__ _____ L----h-..L __
I
I
I ~·~;~I ----------~ -1,:-____ :~·---:.:, -------'-------=--,, ... ,_ -------___ _:__:.: __ ;--2---~=-·-c:c
---------I I I ~--------· -----
I If' -----------------------:'1
J11 ---------I J:;
I -. -----~ :
. ' .. --~~~.
' rr ' ---____ _! --/
/
I
' I
/
. :
--------------~ ' I
I ! --_.t • : ' rx
'
-------1 ! I
:: I
' I
--i ·--
14390
Carnat=•n UGA
Executive Recommended UGA
Attachment F to Motion 00-3 March2000 2002 131
® King County
DDES =:' .... ~~~~ I Tilts mop lo -lor I*Mina -oalf and I lonol--ll>or-......... .-.emet~~a.
500 0 500 Feet
* Consult the r.~l'ln~unn•
Comprehensive Plan
/ ·. / ----
-~----__:___ ;"' / ~ ~, ///
--=-./ ~~-....... '
, ~ • ~ 1999 UGA Boondary
IV 2000 UGA Boondary
-lrlOOiporcJied Areas .
',
i '
.. ~--· --. -~---~
! -----i
' '· '
' '•J
'(. •'. '
... __ ,
---J -------
14390
Map'" Valley ll
Executive Recommended Land Use
March2000
Attachment G to Motion 00-3 , ~ • ~ 1999 UGA_Boundary 2 D D 2 1 3 1
N
1\1 2000 UGA Boundary ug Urban Residential, General
® King County -Incorporated Areas rr Rural Residential land Use :oDES =~..t~a.rw-
1 Tbtl mop • lntondad .., plomfng lUI*" ody tnd 1 _llnotg_ID_""""""" __
500 0 500 Feet
rr
ug
~
------------------
14390
-------------------
KING COUNTY
Signature Report
June 18, 2002
Ordinance 14391
1200 Kmg County Courthouse
516 Thud A venue
Seattle, WA 98104
COPY RECEIVED
AUG 2 6 ?002
Kent City Attorney
Proposed No. 2002-0132.1 Sponsors Hague and Phil Ips ___ _J
1 AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the
2 Countywide Planning Policies in support ofthe Snoqualmie
3 Preservation Initiative; ratifying the amended Countywide
4 Planning Policies for unincorporated King County; and
5 amending Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and
6 K.C.C. 20.10.030 and Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as
7 amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040.
8
9
10 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY:
11 SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings.
12 A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth
13 Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012-Countywide Planning
14 Policies (Phase I) in July 1992, under Ordinance 10450.
15 B. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase II
16 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994, under Ordinance
17 11446.
1
Ordinance 14391
18 C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on October 24,2001, and
19 voted to recommend amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning
20 Policies [ 5/25/94], to reflect the resolution of the City of Snoqualmie's joint planning
21 area and amending the urban growth area boundary accordingly.
22 SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are
23 each hereby amended to read as follows:
24 Phase II. A. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide
25 Planning Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted.
26 B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning
27 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027.
28 C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
29 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421.
30 D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
31 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260.
32 E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
33 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415.
34 F. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
35 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858.
36 G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
37 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to this ordinance.
38 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 are
39 each hereby amended to read as follows:
2
Ordinance 14391
40 Ratification for unincorporated King County. A. Countywide Planning
41 Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes specified are hereby ratified on
42 behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.
43 B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance
44 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.
45 C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance
46 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.
47 D. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning
48 Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of
49 unincorporated King County.
50 E. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
51 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the
52 population of unincorporated King County.
53 F. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
54 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
55 population of unincorporated King County.
56 G. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
57 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
58 population of unincorporated King County.
59 H. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
60 shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415, are hereby ratified on behalf of
61 the population of unincorporated King County.
3
Ordinance 14391
62 I. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
63 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858, are hereby ratified on behalf of
64 the population of unincorporated King County.
65 J. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
66 shown by Attachment 1 to this ordinance, are hereby ratified on behalf ofthe population
67 of unincorporated King County.
68
Ordinance 14391 was introduced on 3/18/2002 and passed by the Metropolitan King
County Council on 6/17/2002, by the following vote:
ATTEST:
Yes: 12-Ms. Sullivan, Ms. Edmonds, Mr. von Reichbauer, Ms. Lambert, Mr.
Phillips, Mr. McKenna, Mr. Constantine, Mr. Pullen, Mr. Gossett, Ms. Hague,
Mr. Irons and Ms. Patterson
No:O
Excused: 1 -Mr. Pelz
KING COUNTY COUNCIL
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council
APPROVED this~ day of=~:...._cc_-=----' 2002.
Attachments 1. GMPC Motion No. 01-3
4
< m
t::.l1
2002 132
10/24/01
Sponsored By: GMPC
lg
MOTION NO. 01-3
2 A MOTION by the Growth Management Planning Council
3 of King County amending the Countywide Planning Policies
4 and the Urban Growth Area to reflect the resolution of the
5 City of Snoqualmie's Joint Planning Area in support of the
6 Snoqualmie Preservation Initiati_ve.
7
8 WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act, RCW 36. 70A.ll 0 requires
9 counties to designate an urban growth area or areas within which urban growth shall be
I 0 encouraged and outside of which growth can occur only if it is not urban in nature; and
II
12 WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policy FW -I, Step 8b, adopted in 1994 and amended in
13 1999, recognizes the Snoqualmie Joint Planning Area as the last outstanding Joint Planning
14 Area in King County, and directs King County and the City of Snoqualmie to conduct a
15 joint planning process consistent with the 1990 Interlocal Agreement between King County
16 and the City of Snoqualmie to determine the Urban Growth Area for the City of
17 Snoqualmie; and
18
19 WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policy FW -1, Step 8b further states that within the Joint
20 Planning Area, the agreed upon Urban Growth Area is not subject to ratification by the
21 Growth Management Planning Council; and
22
23 WHEREAS, King County and the City of Snoqualmie completed a joint planning process
24 in May, 2001, and the resulting Snoqualmie Urban Growth Area Subarea Plan recommends
25 additions to the City of Snoqualmie's Urban Growth Area within the designated Joint
26 Planning Area, refinements to the City of Snoqualmie's existing Urban Growth Area, and
27 policies to guide annexation within the areas reconunended to be added to the City of
28 Snoqualmie's Urban Growth Area; and
29
30 WHEREAS, consistent with Countywide Planning Policy FW -1, Step 8b and the
3 I recommendations of the Snoqualmie Urban Growth Area Subarea Plan, King County
32 adopted Ordinance 14117 on June 4, 200 I, adding 525 acres to the City of Snoqualmie's
33 l Jrhan Growth Area within the designated Joint Planning Area; and
34
1/smpdmohonslmniOI-l tin<· 14391 -1 -
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
WHEREAS, the King County Executive, the Metropolitan King County Council, the
Mayor of Snoqualmie and the Snoqualmie City Council requests that the Growth
Management Planning Council consider additional refinements to the City of Snoqualmie's
Urban Growth Area as recommended by the City of Snoqualmie Urban Growth Area
Subarea Plan, resulting in a net reduction in the Urban Growth Area of 5 acres, for
eventual adoption by the Metropolitan King County Council and ratification by the cities.
THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY
HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS:
I) Delete Countywide Planning Policy FW -I Step 8 to reflect the resolution of the
Snoqualmi~ Joiul Plruming Au:;a:
By 1998, all ofthe joint fJlar.ning areas identified ia the 1994 CPPs ha-ve heea resolved,
except for the City of Sao~Jaalmie. Jomt J3lar~-Hag for aay )3oteatial additieaal
ann~ation of land to the City of SnoE}aalmie shall be eondueted consistent with the
terms efthe 1990 lnterlocal Agreemeat betweea King Ceuaty aad the City of
SROE}I:lalmie. F~:~t1:1re Ce~:~nty.vide PI arming Poliey amendments regarding the
Snoq~:~almie Joint planning area consistent with the 1990 lnterloeal Agreement are not
subject to ratification.
2) Amend the Growth Management Planning Council Proposed Urban Growth
Boundary Map in the Countywide Planning Policies as shown on Attachment 1 to:
a. Delete the Snoqualmie Joint Planning Area;
b. Amend the Urban Growth Area by adding 209 acres north and west of the City
ofSnoqualmie; and
c. Amend the Urban Growth Area by removing 214 acres south of the City of
Snoqualmie.
14;:$91
Ugnlpdmohon.s/motOI-J doc
- 2 -
ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County the 24th day of
2 October, 2001.
3
4
5 air, Growth Management Planning Council
6
7
8
9 Attachments: Urban Growth Boundary Map with boundary changes and Joint Planning
10 Area eliminated
11
14391
Ugmpc/mobonslmotO 1-3 doc
-3 -
,...-4
~
~
~ ,.....
'. l f(::... ... ,_ .. ,'"
·' '•
)
!
-~ ~ ¥:
-~ \ -#-,<
!
\
)"'<"'~1
"'·
/
':'r~"-"·
:" ;~j:t~~-, :.·.) --'" "'';r:{&+~<t-7 . :-i ~~··(-~:if") C:'.il'J • tTfJ:~,t~,-:.-?rrt..._ .. :r it-..
-: /Wj~~:~
'/·,\ "-! ')}. •'' ((C(t·
'..-~ ... _ ... ",.,.
'"
-~ .. :.; ,,;,~:-:. .... ,
,.,Ct414 ~' ~-..... '\, ; .... ,
-~~-
1Ji~8
~lite~.._
~~*' ~-~,..... ~\J.l!IK+liJOI:~
132
Growtft ~1anag.:m~nt Planning C~'Undl
Url>an C\rowlh Bou11dary
G:iJ UMAH OhllW'Pi AREA • U'ttrv.xmorated Ar.1Mty Ctl>n+~r
I ....... J flURA ... P:A
flun•l • O'W'I c..;..,.; -Fr .. t-tt='!OO.Jct:on nv~lr1d3
['??') A.ijlk llhlti'i Ptodurtlo:' OhJ.tr:ct:e. -OP~N':lPACF
/"'-/ F ropo~ Urba-n (Srrowtn Area Lu~ ::=.., '"'"""'"'"'d ~~., ... . ) Ncf"l,r..M6d ~1rt,a·1 C~rUets.
~'Jf'lt"~l Wa~h&i'.l-
~;< .. ':.~l Mucidottt.hl1ltt.Mr "'BSGI'VQ-th;'m
:=:J Wal~r )ocf~
~ r:h)ft~~J~~~,....,~~~~ct<:U,
=~~~~~~A~~=~
~~~~~~~~;::;~tv~ 11\,~~-»
"w4'W:t~b""'"111:t~~UJ<!CI'»:)»t~~~V.lt:'~ --~ll<ttw.""1
KING COUNTY
Signature Report
June 18, 2002
1200 King County Courthouse
516 Third Avenue
Seattle, WA 98104
---
Ordinance 14392 COPY RECEiVED
AUG % 6 ZOOZ
Proposed No. 2002-0133.1 Sponsors Hague Kent City Attorney
1 AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the
2 Countywide Planning Policies, adding maps of existing
3 urban separators; ratifying the amended Countywide
4 Planning Policies for unincorporated King County; and
5 amending Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and
6 K.C.C. 20.10.030 and Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as
7 amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040.
8
9
10 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY:
11 SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings.
12 A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth
13 Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012-Countywide Planning
14 Policies (Phase I) in July 1992, under Ordinance 10450.
15 B. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase II
16 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994, under Ordinance
17 11446.
1
-------------------------
Ordinance 14392
18 C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on December 11,2001, and
19 voted to recommend amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning
20 Policies [5/25/94], adding maps of existing urban separators.
21 SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are
22 each hereby amended to read as follows:
23 Phase II. A. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide
24 Planning Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted.
25 B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning
26 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027.
27 C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
28 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421.
29 D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
30 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260.
31 E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning
32 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415.
33 F. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
34 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858.
35 G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
36 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to this ordinance.
37 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 are
38 each hereby amended to read as follows:
2
Ordinance 14392
39 Ratification for unincorporated King County. A. Countywide Planning
40 Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes specified are hereby ratified on
41 behalf ofthe population of unincorporated King County.
42 B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance
43 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.
44 C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance
45 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.
46 D. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning
47 Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf ofthe population of
48 unincorporated King County.
49 E. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
50 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the
51 population ofunincorporated King County.
52 F. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
53 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
54 population of unincorporated King County.
55 G. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
56 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
57 population of unincorporated King County.
58 H. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
59 shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415, are hereby ratified on behalf of
60 the population of unincorporated King County.
3
Ordinance 14392
61 · I. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
62 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858, are hereby ratified on behalf of
63 the population of unincorporated King County.
64 J. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
65 shown by Attachment 1 to this ordinance, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population
66 of unincorporated King County.
67
Ordinance 14392 was introduced on 3/18/2002 and passed by the Metropolitan King
County Council on 6/17/2002, by the following vote:
ATTEST:
Yes: 13 -Ms. Sullivan, Ms. Edmonds, Mr. von Reichbauer, Ms. Lambert, Mr.
Phillips, Mr. Pelz, Mr. McKenna, Mr. Constantine, Mr. Pullen, Mr. Gossett,
Ms. Hague, Mr. Irons and Ms. Patterson
No:O
Excused: 0
KING COUNTY COUNCIL
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council
APPROVED this 'dJ day of .)~
Attachments I . GMPC Substitute Motion 0 I-I
4
~
ri1
0 rn.
< rn
g
--------
200 2 ., 3 ;;
November 15, 2001
Sponsored Ry: Executive Committee
/staff draft v2
1 SUBSTITUTE MOTION NO. 01-1
2 A MOTION to amend the Countywide Planning Policies by adding maps of
3 existing Urban Separators to the Countywide Planning Polictes.
4
5 WHEREAS, The Growth Management Act states that each Urban Growth Area shall pennit urban
6 densities and shall include greenbelt and open space areas;
7
8 WHEREAS, Policy LU-27 of the Countywide Planning Policies of King County states that Urban
9 Separators shall not be redesignated in the future, and that maintenance of Urban Separators is a
1 0 regional as well as local concern;
l1
12 WHEREAS, Urban Separators are an adopted regional strategy serving multiple functions
13 and providing environmental, visual, recreational and wildlife benefits to the citizens and
14 communities ofKing County;
15
16 WHEREAS, Consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies, the King County Comprehensive
17 Plan recognizes that Urban Separators create open space corridors, provide a visual contrast to
18 continuous development, and reinforce the unique identities of communities;
19
20 WHEREAS, King County has designated Urban Separators on the Land Use 2000 map in the King
21 County Comprehensive Plan, and King County has provided advance copies of Urban Separator
22 maps to cities that have designated Urban Separators located within their Potential Annexation
23 Areas;
24
25 WHEREAS, affected jurisdictions agree with most of the county Urban Separator designations,
26 but disagree with some of the designations that require fi1rther analysis and discussion;
27
28 WHEREAS, Kmg County residents have supported efforts to designate and preserve Urban
29 Separators, including preservation of Urban Separators that have been annexed by cittes;
30
31 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY HEREBY
32 MOVES AS FOLLOWS:
33
34 1. The attached maps of Urban Separators will be included within the Countywide
35 Planning Policies document. These maps show the locations of adopted Urban ·
36 Separators and graphically illustrate regional land use strategy and will serve as an
37 implementation tool for the Countywide Planning Policies.
IJGMPCf200\GMPC/Mollon01-l doc 14392
2 2. The attached maps of Urban Separators also identifY certain potential Urban Separator
3 areas within Auburn and Renton's Potential Annexation Areas that do not reflect a
4 consensus of affected jurisdictions, and are in need of further analysis and possible
5 refinement The Interjurisdictional Staff Team shall convene a subcommittee
6 comprised of representatives of all affected jurisdictions, and shall report back to the
7 GMPC no later than September 30, 2002 with a recommendation to resolve these
8 potential Urban Separator areas. The subcommittee shall consider refinements to
9 Urban Separator designations in the Potential Annexation Areas for Auburn and
1 0 Renton. Staff will attempt to generate a consensus recommendation for the areas
11 within Auburn and Renton's P AA. If no consensus is reached, a majority and minority
12 or alternative recommendation will be made to GMPC by September 30, 2002.
13
14 3. On an ongoing basis, the lnterjurisdictiona1 Staff Team shall also review proposed
15 additional Urban Separator designations identified by cities or the County, and present
16 these proposed Urban Separators for GMPC consideration. As part of this review
17 process, the Interjurisdictional Staff Team may also consider refinements to adopted
18 Urban Separator policy to facilitate designations, provided that the new policies are
19 substantively consistent with CPP LU-27 and County Comprehensive Plan policies P-
20 118 through P-120.
21
22 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on ______ _
23 in open session.
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31 Ron Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council
14392
UGMPC/2001GMPC/Motl0n01-l doc
---------------
Urban Separators: North Overview +
"' """-.. c::J u.t.n .........,.. .. -t-12du•o -.-.--"> -.-.----->·---0
IES51 u.t.n~llt'"""-'d ..... o.-.-......... --0
-Aleb far FurttwrOIIau ..... CJ --1dU/U-10.C o ..... ~-">
~ i lnoorpolmd .-.. -,.,.__. ... _.,._ -----~ -Conlnu*y...._ (&)
14392
c:J ..__ .... ,....... -,_ __
_ ..__>l:t.oollo --..
1!25<1 .,..._ .. __ c:J .-.-............ -.....
-..._.,......__ c:J __ ...... , .... ,_ c:J ... .,.,___
C::..i ~"'---~Bu.l .... c.nw -Odw~ ----.,.,_., .........
14392