HomeMy WebLinkAbout319A1
2
3
5
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
RESOLUTION NO.~~
>A nesolution of the City of Kent employing special
associate counsel in connection with Local Improve-
ment District No. 229 of the vity of Kent.
iVHEREAS, the Gity of Kent heretofore made and entered
into a contrs.ct with noberts Company, Inc. , dated 24 July 1950,
for the im :·rovement of certain streets and s.lleys in the City
by the installation of sanitsry sewers therein; and
v , .. ~~~-(.-'~i~~.A.fi, ss.id contractor has neglected and failed, and ~.,~ ?-{ause~. , to complete its contract in accordance with the
~T m~-an~~:pecifieations thereof; e.nd
·~ .. ·· ~·l~AS, such neglect, failure and refusal of the Con-
l> ·. a:· r is sufficient grounds to transfer the employment of the
~rl.t rorr:.lthe lion tractor to its ;;;>urety; and
i" ' j W~~E_.::_s, It 1e apparent that 11 tige.tion upon said contract
nu:-}ion_~t.he transfer of the employment of the work thereunder
~ th~~Contractor to the Surety is probable;
t'' '·" . j:"' .,[, NO\'f, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE ... ¥.-[T£ OF KENT, \iASHINGTON, as follows:
/ 1. The legEll firm of Hyland, ElYidge and Alvord, of
_, eattle, Washington, be and it is hereby, retained by the
f ity of Kent as special associate counsel of said City for
the purpose, with the liity Attorney, of participating in
negotiations, consults.tions; and in adYi4l1ng on matters relc.ting
to said contract, and for the purpose ot instituting and
maintaining all proceedings necessary, or ot defending any
proceedi·gs instituted by others, in connection with the
se.id contract.
2. 'J.'he costs e.nd expenses incident to such proceedings
shall be borne by and assessed against the pro :erty included
in Locs.l Improvement District No. 229, ae Erovided by Ordinance
~o. 828 of the ~ity or Kent cre&ting s£1d !strict.
PASSED, by the Oity Council of the ~ity of Kent this
•th. day of December, 1950. "' i
if