HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Committees - Parks and Human Services - 06/07/19940 1 •
Parks Committee Meeting Minutes
June 7, 1994
Councilmembers Present: Christi Houser, Chair; Jim Bennett
and Paul Mann
Staff Present: Jack Ball, Tom Brubaker, Patrice
Thorell, Helen Wickstrom, Bill Wolinski,
Charlie Lindsey, Jim Stone, Thomas
Sovay, Jack Ball, John Hodgson, Lori
Hogan, Stephan Noeske, Teri Stump
Others Present: Linda Johnson and Jennifer Stoner, Kent
Saturday Market; Harold Perantie, Golf
Advisory Board; Michael Keyes. Frankie
Keyes, 0216 SE 267th, Kent; Herbye
White, King County Parks and Recreation;
James Cobb, 226 Titusville Alley #15,
Kent; Tom Beckwith, Beckwith Consulting
Group
SATURDAY MARKET REPORT:
Jennifer Stoner presented the Saturday Market Report. There are
now 21 season vendors. Revenues are up even with the recent bad
weather. The Lions Club has offered 20 additional spaces at the
Library during Cornucopia Days. They are still working on a
parking problem; vendors aren't parking in the appropriate
spaces. Only hand-crafted, home made items are allowed at the
Market; no imports or manufactured merchandise. Reggie Jefferson
of the Mariners will be at the market on Saturday to sign
autographs. Local groups will be performing during the month of
June.
DIRECTOR OF GOLF:
John Hodgson reviewed Thomas Savoy's professional experience and
the process by which he was recommended for the position of
Director of Golf of the Riverbend Golf Complex. John Hodgson
then recommended appointment of Thomas Savoy as Director of Golf
and for the contract with S.S.M.D. to include an addendum to the
contract; only as its relates to the Director of Golf.
Thomas Savoy shared improvements he and staff have already
implemented such as: arranging regular meetings with the men's
and women's golf clubs to maintain an equitable and fair
relationship, creation of a driving range backup system and
revision of the Tee Time computer system process. This summer is
the first annual Junior Golf Camp and the First Annual Golf
Championship.
Councilmember Bennett moved to accept recommendation from the
Parks Department to acceptance the contract appointing Thomas
Savoy as Director of Golf at the Riverbend Golf Complex and an
addendum to Section 2A, referencing services of the Director of
Golf, be attached to the contract.-Councilmember Mann seconded.
The motion passed 3-0.
Page 1
RIVERBEND PROPOSED 1994 GREENS FEE SCHEDULE:
John Hodgson presented the final review of the updated staff
report on the Proposed 1994 Greens Fee Schedule and resident fee
previously approved by the Parks Committee on 4/5/94 . John
Hodgson explained that the reason for the increase in greens fees
is to allow us to make the proposed improvements to the golf
course as part of the CIP Master Plan. John Hodgson requested
the greens fee increase be effective July 15, 1994, and due to
the challenge of initiating a resident type system and the time
involved, he suggested the deadline for the resident fee be
extended to January 1, 1995., This would allow more time to
create a blanket promotional piece, advertise and prepare for the
program.
Councilmember Bennett moved to adopt the increased rate as
published effective July 15, 1994, provided further study is
conducted on the resident discount rate and other options with a
deadline January 1,1995. Councilmember Mann seconded. The
motion passed 3-0. John Hodgson agreed to generate a promotion
for the public covering all of the information on the golf course
master plan.
GOLF ADVISORY BOARD:
Harold Perantie distributed the meeting minutes of the May 25,
Golf Advisory Board. He mentioned that the Mayor will be
appointing Pat Greeney to the advisory board. The financial
report reflected operating revenues are up 10.4% and expenses
were less than 1/2 of 1% over 1993. He stated that the board was
very encouraged by the new staff and the golf merchandise the
shop recently received. Permanent restrooms are being looked
into. The PGA issue has been resolved.
TITUS PARK TREES:
Professional arborist Mark Mead, was hired to conduct an
examination on the condition of the trees at Titus Park. Based on
his evaluation, John Hodgson recommended that the two dead or
dying trees #1 and #2, be cut down.
Frankie Keyes, owner of the building next to the trees said that
these trees have posed a great inconvenience to her throughout
the years by dropping wet leaves on her building's flat roof.
This has caused her expensive cleaning and repair to her gutters
and awnings. Michael Keyes was concerned about hazard of the
dead or dying trees and the roots from one of the trees which are
buckling up the sidewalk. Frankie Keyes voiced her concern that
the mural on the south side of her building which is scheduled to
be painted by an artist through the Arts Commission will be
obscured by these trees.
James Cobb, resident of the apartment building next to Titus Park
agrees that Tree #2 should be taken down but stated that he would
rather see the trees saved by pruning and cabling and performing
yearly inspections. He would also like to see replacement of the
laurel hedge on the east side of the park which was taken out.
Page 2
U
0
Stephan Noeske of the Public Works Department responded to the
problem of the roots buckling up the sidewalk; he has designed an
arch to be constructed over the -roots which meets ADA standards.
Tom Brubaker stated that the city would be liable if one of these
dead or dying trees were to fall on neighboring property, and now
the city can't plead ignorance to this problem.
Linda Johnson of the Kent Downtown Association asked the
committee to think of what the park is going to look like in the
future and to handle this issue accordingly. If dead trees must
be taken out, plant new ones to replace them.
Councilmember Bennett suggested that John Hodgson work with the
local residents and staff to come up with a win-win solution.
John Hodgson will establish a committee. John Hodgson asked for
immediate direction on the two dying trees.
Councilmember Mann moved to remove dead or dying trees #1 and #2.
Councilmember Bennett seconded. The motion passed 3-0. Included
in this vote is the direction for John Hodgson to assemble a
committee consisting of Parks Department staff and interested
community members to discuss future improvements for Titus Park.
COMPREHENSIVE PARK PLAN:
Tom Beckwith of Beckwith Consulting Group presented an overview
of the draft summary of the findings and recommendations within
the comprehensive park and recreation plan. His conclusions
were: the growth impact fee must be between 25 and 50 percent of
the actual cost of maintaining the existing level -of -service.; a
proposed citywide bond must raise between $23,632,093 and
$29,540,116 of the cost of raising the level -of -service to the
proposed standard and, if some of the proposed level -of -service
enhancements are reduced or extended beyond the next 6 -year
programming time period, and if the use of general funds,
conservation futures, real estate excise taxes, intergovernmental
grants and other sources are to remain the same as in recent
years.
Helen Wickstrom reviewed the design boards on the proposed
Athletic Complex, Teen Center and the Cultural Art Center.
A random public survey was conducted in May 1994 of 200
registered votes. The survey accuracy range is within +/- 8
percent.
The survey consisted of a mixture of 50/50, male and females
within the ages of 35-49 (32;) and 50-64 (29%), living in the
area 6-10 years (22%) and 25+ years (21%). It was conducted in
the evenings and weekends. The reflected 54% of those asked have
taken part in a recreational programs that has been provided by
the City of Kent in the past 12 months and rated Kent in the
excellent for overall quality. When asked, the majority asked
did not want the standard of programs and/or facilities reduced.
Page 3
9
The Green River Trail was used most of all facilities. Over 40%
rated the following categories top priority; development of a
teen and youth center; senior programs; and special populations
programs. Also rated high was development of area wide walking
and biking corridor parks, preservation of woodlands, steep
hillsides, wetlands, flood plains and other sensitive wildlife
aquatic areas.
Programs/classes voted mid-range to those surveyed were: before
and after school child care, aquatic instruction, and athletic
leagues and sports programs. Programs receiving a lower
percentage of votes were: adult education and instruction,
physical conditioning and fitness classes, cultural and
performing arts instruction, entertainment and special events.
58% felt that based on projected growth in the area, there will
not be enough park and recreation facilities within the city,
county and school district system. The majority would support a
bond issue and would be willing to pay an average of $117.85 per
household per year to expand or improve park and recreation
facilities and programs. The majority also voted to collect a
growth impact fee from new development.
Helen Wickstrom stated that in order to be eligible this year to
receive grant funds from IAC, a Comp Plan must be adapted and
submitted to meet IAC's deadline of July 1.
Councilmember Bennett moved to adopt the Comprehensive Park and
Recreation Plan. Councilmember Mann seconded. The motion passed
3-0.
DISTRIBUTION OF 1993 OPEN SPACE BOND INTEREST REVENUES:
Helen Wickstrom reported that the Open Space Bond generated
interest revenues in the amount of $118,631 which could be
allocated to the Interurban Trail Project. The money is needed
to place rubberized material on a spur line which crosses the
Interurban Trail and for possible court fees involved in the
settlement with the contractor who built the bridge over the
Green River as part of the trail project.
Councilmember Bennett moved to accept and appropriate the Open
Space Bond interest revenue in the amount of $118,131 to the
Interurban Trail Project. Councilmember Mann seconded. The
motion passed 3-0.
Page 4
I
Telephone Survey Results
Kent Comprehensive Park & Recreation Plan
The telephone survey was completed for 200 randomly selected registered voter households within
the city of Kent of which 50 percent were male and 50 percent were female. The results are accurate
within +/-8 percent. The following statistics will not add as the percentages have not been rounded
and do not include don't know responses.
Behavior
In the past 12 months how many times, if any, have you or members of your household used the
following Kent and King County park and recreation facilities - never or 0 times, 1-2 times, 3-6 times,
7-12 times or more than 12 times per year?
times/year - Kent facilities
0 1-2 3-6 602 12+
50% 14% 21% 6% 6% 1: Kent Commons?
73% 416%8%
X 3% 4% 2: Senior Activity Center?
sax x ox 1% 3: Special Populations Resource Center?
51% x 7% 16% 4: Green River Trail?
63x 3% 7% 5: Lake Fenwick Trail?
77% 11% 5x 2% ix 6: Van Doren's Landing?
72% 8% 9x 4% 6% 7: Commons Playfield?
73x 10x 5x1x 2% 8: Kent Memorial Park?
62% 12% 9% _4xKO%9: Russell Road Park?
64% 9% 11% 5x0: Riverbend Golf Course facilities?
tim s ear - King County facilities
84% 31%1 3% 2% 5% 11: Kent/King County Swimming Pool?
75% 9x 9% 1% 5% 12: Soos Creek Park/Trail?
75x 11% ax 2% 3% 13: Lake Meridian Park?
14: In general, on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 Is the poorest rating and 5 is the highest rating, how
would you rate the overall quality of all existing Kent park and recreational facilities?
poor/excellent t
1 2 3 4 1 5
1% 3% 11% 51% 26x
Priorities
The proposed park plan may share Kent, King County, Kent and Federal Way School District monies
to acquire and develop park and recreational facilities on an areawide basis. On a scale of 1 to 5
where 1 is the least important and 5 is the most important, how would you rate the following
proposals?
least / Wost
1 2 13 1 4 5
16% 18% 26X 18% 19% 15: Develop an indoor cultural or performing arts center?
22x 23x
22% 18% 11% 16: Develop an outdoor amphitheater or performing area along the river?
2
17% 23% 22% 18% 16% 17: Develop a community and family center with meeting facilities, arts and
cra s, an of r activities - similar to Kent Commons?
lox 11% 14% 143X 8: Develop a teen and youth center with physical conditioning,
gymnasium, activi ms, and social spaces - similar to Kent Commons?
18% 15% 23% 2ox lox 19: Develop a major athletic park with the highest quality baseball and
soccer pi ying fields for outh and adult league activities -similar to Russell Road Athletic Complex?
9% 11% 17% 26% 32% 20: Develop areawide walking and biking corridor parks - similar to the
Green River Tr i ?
16% 16"30%20% in 21: Develop waterfront shorelines for fishing and boating activities -similar
to Lake?
8% 13x Sox 25x 18% 22: Develop unique natural resource areas for picnic and other group use
activities simi ar t Van Doren's Landing Park?
6x 1TzPilar
21% 22 23: Conserve and provide public access to unique historical and cultural
sites - si to the do town railroad depot?
6% 6% 12x 2e% 47% 24: Preserve woodlands, steep hillsides, and other sensitive wildlife areas -
similar to Mill e ?
8% 9% 12x 24Z42% 25: Preserve wetlands, floodplains and other sensitive aquatic areas along
the Green Riv r - o North Green River Park?
437% 15% 16% 13% 15% 26: Expand Riverbend Golf Course to include more holes, driving range, and
l4 37%
ouse facilities - provided the improvements are financed by golf user fees and charges?
Growth management
27: In the next 6 years the city's population could increase by another 7,500 people assuming there
are no major annexations. The population within the city including possibleannexation areas could
increase by another 20,700 people. In your opinion, will there be enough park and recreation facilities
within thP�y, caunty, and. mho 1, ds:,trie; systems to provide for thestr�suiation increases?
esno don't know
34% 1 58 Tx
How would you rate the following methods for dealing with the impact of population growth on a
scale of 1 to 5 where 1 is the worst idea and 5 is the best idea?
Door excellent
L1 f 5
157x 12% 16% 4% 3% 28: Reduce the number or standard of park facilities to be provided in the
f tura?
6% 4% cx Mk 4 9: Coilec'ra growth impact fee from new developments to pay for future
Valcilities?
0 0
2r
If the number or standard of park facilities were to be reduced as a method of controlling costs and
growth impacts, which of the following facilities would you recommend be kept the same or be
reduced by up to 5, 10, 15 or 20 percent or more compared to present ratios or standards?
reduce standard by
62% 10% 11% 1% 7z 30: Indoor facilities including swim pools, gyms, and meeting rooms?
73% 10% 7% 2% 5% 31: Athletic fields and courts?
72% a% 9% 1% 4% 32: Walk, hike, bike and horse trails?
66% 11% 9% 3% 5% 33: Picnic, swimming, fishing, camping, and boating facilities?
34: The City of Kent's existing supply of park and recreational facilities is estimated to be worth about
$4,000 per house. If a growth impact fee were to be collected, what percent or dollar amount of this
value would you recommend be charged to each new housing unit to be developed in the city or
surrounding area? f
15% 8% 123% 1 17% 1 8% 15% 7%
General obligation
Growth impact fees can not be used to pay for the expansion or improvement of park and recreation
facilities that serve existing residents. Projects that improve or develop the existing park and
recreation system must be paid by other methods, including the use of voter approved bonds.
35: If a park and recreation bond were to be put on the ballot, how much, if anything, would your
household be willing to pay per year for park and recreation improvements that would benefit
existing residents?
$117.85 amount per yea (Note: record the amount and then sort the actual responses into the
0 ovying
ca
a grouping.)
5250- $200- $1509 $100-1 550- $25- $1-
4X 7% 8% 3% 20X 10% SX 4% 20X
Recreation programs
36: In the past 12 months have you or a member of your household taken part in a recreational
program that has been provided by the City of Kent - such as special events, before and after school
care, f7no
classes, athletic leagues, senior center activities, or other programs?
Yes den,tknow
45% 54% 1%
37: In general, how would you rate the overall quality of the recreational programs that are provided
by the City of Kent on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 is -the lowest and 5 Is the highest quality?
poor exc I ent
1 2 3 4 51
1% 2% 16%[39%A3O
11
0 0
What recreational programs do you think should be offered by the City of Kent on a scale of 1 to 5
where 1 is the least important and 5 is the most important?
least / most
1 2 1 3 4 elsA
1% 5%1-21% 26x 42% 38: Programs for special populations including physical and mental
;F6—n,d1T"1c—aD—p-eWcrr'8% 6x39: Before and after school care and school child latch key programs?
lox 17%40: Cultural and performing arts instruction, entertainment, and special
13% 17% 29x 2ox 18% 41: Physical conditioning and fitness classes?
7% 6% 19% j 30x 36% 42: Athletic leagues and sports programs?
6% 11% 31x 27% 22x 43: Aquatic instruction, recreation, and competition programs?
4% 7% 17% 24x 4 44: Teen age group programs?
4% 5% 19% 28% % 45: Senior age group programs?
7% 15x Sox 27X 46: Adult education and instruction?
Growth impact fees and voter approved bonds can not be used to pay for recreation programs. If it
requires more money to provide present and/or future recreation programs, how would you rate the
following methods of paying for them on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 is the poorest idea and 5 is the
best idea?
poor / excellent
1 2 3 4 5
38% 20x 24% 9% 6x 47: Reduce the number or quality of programs to cortvol costs?
9x 99 299 26% 25% 48: Increase user fees to continue to provide the sarnt program services?
6x 15% 33% 26% 15X 49: Increase the amount the city budget provides to run program services?
Respondent characteristics
50: Which of the following statements best describes the area of Kent you live in?
44% west or 55% east of SR -167 the Valley Freeway?
11% north or 81% south of SE 224th Street?
51: How long have you lived in Kent?
0-1 2-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-2SI 2+ years
2% 18% 22X 12X 15% 9% 1 21X
52: Which of the following age groups are you in?
18-24 -"32%29%
65+ ars
4% 14%19%
4
0
0
City of Kent
Rivebend Golf Complex
Proposed 1994 Greens Fees Schedule
Effective July 15, 1994
PRIME SEASON: MAY 1 to OCT 31
9 Holes - Standard Rate
9 Holes - Sr/Jr Discount
18 Holes - Standard Rate
18 Holes - Sr/Jr Discount
W ez dsk 'tit§u
9 Holes (No Discounts)
18 Holes (No Discounts)
WINTER RATES: NOV 1- APRIL 30
W oeMiys;
9 Holes - Standard Rate
9 Holes - Sr/Jr Rate
18 Holes - Standard Rate
18 Holes - Sr/Jr Rate
W'eeltends. F+§aco�w ;
9 Holes (No Discounts
18 Holes (No Discounts)
`93 Rates:
$11.00
$9.00
$16.50
$13.00
$13.00
$19.50
`.:...... '93 Rates:
$11.00
$9.00
$16.50
$13.00
`93 Rates:
$13.00
$19.50
Proposed Rate:
$13.00
$10.00
$19.00
$15.00
Pioposed AaW
$15.00
$23.00
Pr4osed Rate;
$12.00
10.00
$17.00
$15.00
Proposed Rte:
$14.00
$20.00