Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 12/13/2005
1 � 1 1 1 City of Kent 1 City Council Meeting 1 Agenda 1 1 December 13, 2005 1 Mayor Jim White Deborah Ranniger, Council President 1 Councilmembers 1 Tim Clark Debbie Raplee Ron Harmon Les Thomas 1 Julie Peterson Bruce White 1 1 KENT WASHINGTON 1 City Clerk's Office 1 ' KENT CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS K E N T December 13, 2005 w^s.I.G*o N Council Chambers Vf MAYOR. Jim White COUNCILMEMBERS: Deborah Ranmger, President Tim Clark Ron Harmon Julie Peterson Debbie Raplee Les Thomas Bruce White COUNCIL WORKSHOP AGENDA 5:30 p.m. Item Description Speaker Time 1. Legislative Platform Doug Levy 30 min ' COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA 7:00 p.m. ' 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE— Police and Fire Honor Guards 2. ROLL CALL 3. CHANGES TO AGENDA ' A FROM COUNCIL, ADMINISTRATION, OR STAFF B. FROM THE PUBLIC— Citizens may request that an item be added to the agenda at this time. Please stand or raise your hand to be recognized by the Mayor. 4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ' A. Employee of the Month B. Economic Development Report C. Soroptimist Club Donation for Service Club Park D. Kiwams of Kent Presentation E Introduction of Appointees F Mayor/Council Presentations 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Street Vacation, Portion of 132nd Avenue SE ' 6. CONSENT CALENDAR A Minutes of Previous Meeting—Approve ' B. Payment of Bills—Approve y C. 2006 Annual Budget Ordinance—Adopt 3 � D 2005 Tax Levy Ordinances for 2006 Budget—Adopt e s tj (Continued on back) COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA CONTINUED , E. Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Include 2006-2011 Capital Improvement Plan, Ordinance—Adopt 1, F. Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Revisions to Kent City Code 12.13, School District Capital Facilities Plans Ordinances—Adopt '�`D7 U G. LTGO 2006 Parks Bond Ordinance—Adopt 1 is ' H. Home Street Bank Donation to Fire Department—Accept I. Washington Traffic Safety Commission "DOTS" Mini-Grant—Authorize and Accept J. Washington Traffic Safety Commission "Drive Hammered—Get Nailed" Mini- Grant—Authorize and Accept K. Soroptimist Club Donation for Service Club Park—Accept and Amend Budget ' L. Indigent Counsel Contract—Authorize M. 2006 Art Plan and Five Year Art Plan—Approve N. 2005 Annual Docket Report, Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map and Text , Amendments—Approve O. Agreement with Puget Sound Energy for Easement at Service Club Park— Authorize , P. Vehicle Equipment Surplus—Authorize Q. Disposal of Metrotech Locators—Authorize , R. Street Sweeping Contract Change Order No 4—Authorize S. Univar USA, Inc. 2006 Water Treatment Chemical Contract—Authorize T. JC1 Jones Chemical, Inc. 2006 Water Treatment Chemical Contract—Authorize U. LID 352 Segregation Resolution—Adopt I ,/l t) V. Homeland Security O'Brien Well Security Improvements Contract—Authorize AW. Homeland Security Kent Springs Security Improvements Contract—Authorize X Lifeline Utility Rate Ordinance—Adopt ; Y. Transportation Master Plan Mirai Associates, Inc Contract—Authorize Z. Transportation Master Plan The Transpo Group, Inc. Contract—Authorize AA. Transportation Master Plan CH2M Hill Contract—Authorize B Highline Water District Agreement—Authorize CC. Drinking Driver Task Force Re-appointments —Confirm , DD. Economic Development Corporation Re-appointment—Confirm VgAEE Human Services Commission Appointments and Re-appointment—Confirm FF. Land Use and Planning Board Appointments and Re-appointment—Confirm , GG. Kent Arts Commission Appointment—Confirm S� 7. OTHER BUSINESS , A. Sophia Glenn/Brenna's Vista II Rezone —Approve (QUASI-JUDICIAL) BIDS ' ----('A.\ Kent Senior Center Upgrades a� t (Continued next page) COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA CONTINUED 9. REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES, STAFF AND SPECIAL COMMITTEES 10. CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION AND AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION 12. ADJOURNMENT NOTE- A copy of the full agenda packet is available for perusal in the City Clerk's Office and the Kent Library. The Agenda Summary page and complete packet are on the City of Kent web site at www.ci.kent wa.us. An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of this page. 1 Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City Clerk's Office in advance at (253) 856-5725 For TDD relay service call the Washington Telecommunications Relay Service at 1-800-833-6388. r a a Swi6ai g n0 >.�? 5«a a v NEp ' 3p emmw £ NJ cc, y '6.6y .gu .cvECo '" c �a maLyn � . ¢us t • - v p w m m c g E OSm p w CIL >_ a § m�� U ao � w9ma ` dram H� vEc ^ aU vE:Fm Swo ..Ewcmar� u w cv = N ° a E c E n- o` mai-S E N = E c = • v A d' ac'QQ a °S 3y o "ter u E 05 o E E 3v y E E < A �'Q m 3 ro 2SS o� U m CE.0 c >p.S v rJ i' '^ ��2 V E CL . 1 M EMu N m N w S W m` a, So ad wcd c� E u n @E (� nENau 8+ = u =4' n N UI > g E c a =-~ EL tSSc is v� t- 3O �; r v`m it n n � �Qa �3 m'a NU OY [ 7 j'im V �1p fr V .� '^ �' a ONi O VLA -2�9 aO od n`:'. LNN o „ " Q � Eru•• .E 6 3� �r aa'- v Aar 3°ec c E o�-po� _ c3N$-6v (� - �r`� ros �_o 3 � U2 `nod >°e v >, �aw UJI $� 2 , y u = ESL io oac $ � ma � O m 4 �Sy5c �""' � N �'c_rc c O� uS�a cUm Hm�'^ .oC�'Amc $' C • _ 5vr F °E�°� 3�i V � y$ a � cti� 3Ee3 M ac = ���eua� da�'c � ac u E u = c E o u C �. U g EsR 0E 0ci w E $ w A oC w E p 0 c u "� _ o_ o e o a . 9L 't� m �� w Ez �a Wig. O �� R '� OL '= E w-cLEAue - aa�- A �S"� e �aAn � p� 3w� CL LE � aea Nc EEBoi E @ Eat $UdcUT a�i w ar u2 iAs ° m uoEcu y oouc°i $ � "- g9�� c �w8i EawEou � Nu pa r n3° Q �eU a5 «� V UU SUS ^ E bFeSV V Q�� riZIP:2CP � 9362 of 1 A s .Ze , u'o onL, Z > > �. {jC ; w q EE _ < c d • � ?v : N � an ^ � 3 t �,n vow v o •• Ln ® �n VLA 4 O Uo � coc Uo M v OLmn Rz = N N E W U c - - l o ROd Wry mcgo U a ' m °c _ 3 u a = O Qc c y 7- u gt p OOP `p L O. O O tl �o mr _t .aC w r >.� u•._ w y n >. O N w y Z O �T m �° c c � gSE - avz � � � • .7 %c c - i Ec = � 01 i�? '" � a5� • £ o d %c E v� 0 m-� �oQpi'M U a a �y _ V O V N a L C " '^ a C H 1�cJ LL' a S� e y a ° r a 3 7 m m Y qc h C '$.a, c 3 3 E �_� �. y o LS u �'$ E''g0OrN. 9op r LOP 'pavi °d$ a o cw E m a .6mac B "p ='- LLJ C C yQ� yy RNq ? QI O V RE-ON i fn E w do.e: �nualuU> sE fEiaL < w Qgl7`. vai CHANGES TO THE AGENDA Citizens wislung to address the Council will, at this time, make known the subject of ' interest, so all may be properly heard. A) FROM COUNCIL, ADMINISTRATION, OR STAFF B) FROM THE PUBLIC PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A) EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH B) ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REPORT C) SOROPTIMIST CLUB DONATION FOR SERVICE CLUB PARK D) KIWANIS OF KENT PRESENTATION E) INTRODUCTION OF APPOINTEES F) MAYOR/COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS I 1 1 1 i Kent City Council Meeting Date December 13, 2005 Category Public Hearings 1. SUBJECT: STREET VACATION, PORTION OF 132ND AVENUE SE 2, SUMMARY STATEMENT: Resolution No. 1713 established December 13, 2005 as the public hearing date for ti,c petition by Mike Romano, on behalf of Norris Homes, Inc., to vacate a portion of 132nd Avenue SE. A staff report recommending approval with conditions is included in the Council's packet 3. EXHIBITS: Staff report, Resolution No. 1713, map, and Corrected public notice 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Staff (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) j5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? No Revenue? No Currently in the Budget? Yes No X If no: Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund Amount $ 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: A. Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds to close the public hearing. B. Councilmemberv_Aoves, Councilmember seconds to approve/des staffs recommendation of approval with conditions of the petition to vacate a portion of 132nd Avenue SE, as referenced in Resolution No 1713, and to direct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance upon compliance with the conditions of approval. DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 5A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Fred N Satterstrom, AICP, Director PLANNING SERVICES KENT Charlene Anderson, AICP, Manager WPSHINGTON Phone• 253-856-5454 Fax 253-856-6454 j Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, WA 98032-5895 December 6, 2005 To: Mayor Jim White, Council President Deborah Ranniger and City Council Members From: Charlene Anderson, AICP, Planning Manager Through: Mayor Jim White Subject: Report and Recommendation on an Application to Vacate a Portion of 132nd Avenue SE #STV-2005-8 (KIVA #2053332) MOTION: To approve/disapprove/modify staff's recommendation of approval with ' conditions of the petition to vacate a portion of 132nd Avenue SE, as referenced in Resolution No. 1713, and to direct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance upon compliance with the conditions of approval. SUMMARY: Mike Romano, Centurion Development Services, 22617 — 8th Drive SE, Bothell, WA 98021, on behalf of Norris Homes, Inc., requests vacation of a portion of 132nd Avenue SE in order to facilitate development of the site. Staff recommends approval with conditions of the street vacation for the reasons outlined below. BUDGET IMPACT: Section 6.09.060 of the Kent City Code enables the City to require compensation at the full appraised value of right of way to be vacated. BACKGROUND: As a condition for approval of King County Short Plat number 874039, recorded December 20, 1974, recording number 7412200293, the property owner was required to convey a 20 foot strip as right of way to King County. The deed was recorded December 10, 1974. This provided a half street right-of-way width of 50 feet. In 2004 the City approved the Tahoma Vista preliminary plat application on the subject property for a subdivision with 19 lots. The road right-of-way necessary to construct the required half street improvements along the entire property frontage of 132"d Avenue Southeast was 44 feet. This leaves six feet of public right-of-way that is not necessary for City roadway construction. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff notified the following departments and agencies of this proposed street vacation. • Public Works Department ■ Police • Parks, Recreation and Community Services ■ Fire and Life Safety j ■ ComCast Cable Communications Inc. ■ Puget Sound Energy ■ Qwest ■ METRO Transit Division After a review of the comments received and the merits of the proposal, staff t recommends that the request to vacate a portion of 132nd Avenue SE, as described in Resolution #1713 and as shown on the accompanying map be APPROVED with the following conditions. 1) The City shall be compensated in U.S. currency the full appraised value of the property to be vacated. 2) The petitioners shall deposit $3500 with the City to be used to obtain an M.A.I. appraisal of the subject property in order to determine the fair market value of the area proposed to be vacated. Any funds not expended on an appraisal shall be applied to the compensation due the City for the vacated right of way. 3) The City shall retain utility easements within, under, upon and/or over said property to be vacated, including ingress and egress for construction, extending and maintenance of said utilities. 4) The City shall also reserve utility easements for any private, quasi-private, and/or public utility server such as but not limited to power, gas, telephone, cable TV, water and/or sewer districts which have any existing facilities within, under, upon and/or over the area to be vacated. Reservation for said servers shall include ingress and egress for maintenance. City of Kent easement reservation rights shall at all times remain paramount over any other rights reserved herein. CA\pm S\Permit\Plan\vacations\2005\2053332-2005-8CC121305 DOC Enc. Map, Resolution No 1713, Public notice w/corrected legal description cc Mike Romano,Centurion Development Services, 22617—81"Drive SE, Bothell,WA 98021 Jerry McCaughan, Property Manager Project File#STV-2005-8 #STV-2005-8(KIVA 42053332) Staff Report-City Council 12/13/05 Page 2 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. /12 IA RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, regarding the vacation of a portion of 132"d Avenue SE, located in the City of Kent, Washington; and setting the public hearing on the proposed street vacation for December 13, 2005. iRECITALS A. A petition, attached as Exhibit A, has been filed to vacate a portion of 132"d Avenue SE in the City of Kent, Washington. B. The petition is signed by the owners of at least two-thirds of the real property abutting that portion of 13e Avenue SE to be vacated. C. The petition is in all respects proper. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: RESOLUTION SECTION 1. —Public Hearing. A public hearing on the street vacation petition requesting the vacation of a portion of 132"d Avenue SE, shall be held at a regular meeting of the Kent City Council at 7.00 p.m., Tuesday, December 13, 2005, in the 1 132id Avenue SE— Street Vacation Council Chambers of City Hall located at 220 4th Avenue South, Kent, Washington, 98032. SECTION I —Notice. The City Clerk shall give proper notice of the hearing and cause the notice to be posted as provided by state law, Chapter 35.79 RCW. SEC?70N 3. — In&mation. The Planning Manager shall obtain any other necessary information from appropriate departments and shall transmit the information to the Council so that the Council may consider the matter at its regularly scheduled meeting on December 13,2005. SECTION 4. — Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution is declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this resolution. SECTION S. —Rai on. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. SECTION —g 've Date. This resolution shall take effect and be in force immediately upon its passage. 1 PASSED at a regular open public eeting by the City Council of the City of Kent,Washington,this_�day of r�2005. ONCURRED in by the Mayor of the City of Kent this �_ day of Al 2005. / t MrH ITE,MAYOR 2 132v4 Avenue SE— Street Vacation ATTEST: rf _`. � IBRENDA JACOBER, CLERK ✓ APPROVED AS TO FORM: 4pk tc td�� TOM BRUBAKER,CITY ATTORNEY I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. !el*assed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, the t day of !UH , I 2005. u BRENDA JACOBER, CLERK P%Caa11 WLLM0N6TVAC•172d Av ueSE-PubhcHeaagAm '_ •• f J JG , N 3 132"d Avenue SE— Street Vacation f U U SEP 14 2DQ5 U CITY OF KENT • _ CITY CLERK KENT KIVA#Et WAS NIf1 SIT OM Mayor Jim Whits APPLICANT: 1 MAIL TO: RECEIVED NAME: off.' A4Aea � p eDVrL,4iR/ O.e% S Ve IS CITY OF KENT ADDRESS: ZZ6/17- 8t,,at SF Property Management SEP o 8 205 220 S. 0 Avenue CaY of KENT o EZL Kent, WA 98032 ppRLpt'CENTIER - 19ik DA' 0 AT-IN: Jerry McCaughan PHONE: jo-zz3 STREET AND/OR ALLEY VACATION APPLICATION AND PETITION ' Dear Mayor and Kent City Council: I We,the undersigned abutting property owners,hereby respectfully request that certain 0 Alley Street hereby be vacated described as follows (include square feet). THE WEST 6.00 FEET OF THE EAST 20.00 FEET OF THE WEST 50.00 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LANDS: THE NORTH %OF THE NWl/4 OF THE SWl/4 OF THE SWIA AND THE NORTH 20 FEET OF THE WEST 290 FEET OF THE SOUTHI/2 OF THE NWI/4 OF THE SW1/4 OF THE SWI/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON BRIEF STATEMENT WHY VACATION IS BEING SOUGHT A "CiJRRENT" ownership and encumbrance report must be obtained from a Title Company and submitted with this application that covers all the abutting properties contiguous to alley or street sough to be vacated. When Corporations, partnerships, etc. are being signed for, and then proof of individual's authority to sign for same shall also be submitted. Attach a color-coded map of a scale of not less than I" = 200' of the area sought for vacation. (NOTE) Map must correspond with legal description. AUBUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS TAX LOT# SIGNATURES AND ADDRESSES LOT,BLOCK&PLAT/SEC.TOWN.R.G. "ZZ-f"Slov.lor Z053 fir 104, . allogpe .tw. 7�izLaoz�s Tb6+crxc�C w•rK Afgntzt2f 934&nQ iA4* 9"5/0 W1zzZzo5 i/L( Lo r 8' or rc sP• AM Al 95%a202l93 1 �xy�e,r RIE E0W E PLAT OF TAHOMA VISTA REQUEST FOR 132"AVE SE ROW VACATIO BRED STATEMENT WHY VACATION IS BEING SOCITY OF The existing 59 right of way east of ROW centerline is 6' wider than City of Kent Public Works requires or desires for construction of required plat road frontage improvements. 132nd Ave. SE along the project frontage will be improved to THE City of Kent's planned ultimate road configuration. Vacation of 6' of right of way is required in order to achieve the approved preliminary plat configuration and lot count. RECEIVED SEP 0 8 2005 GITY OF KENT PERWCENTM .l i . t .1 1 LOT I p`• � LOT 2 �. Z� ` : 1•Z I q q ` AVIZA 590 rdl" 276 _ WkO-Z7 1✓ _vBF-moo-iG c✓ 35&.cS — _ _ 35B•aZ LAJ b ` r ��6 ro •�— c;�rc trf G8 ins Noe Z4/.9/ N lo7 q� 13�5 f ``LJn z v/ q v° zoo." g •• PORTION OF 132ND AVENUE SE - c'• u STV-2005-8 (KIVA#RESV-2053332) _�l1 CITY OF KENT CITY CLERK q V V V 3 soy 7Z z7 — 111•IG 24 24 .r r //7.e! 34 r to �G 9a u^4� NBB 4 I L.66� NQe 47.191�/ Z74(P.) P 20y4p IO a��= 19 p� R IV 7 z UL `a h• n 4� 110 h ` J. o � A pTAO I a 9 0 8 v oz ge,v,42 e[3 w . < 13 L p m 7 an co.eg N n h m1 10110,� %00� I, �d x N 6 bq -! m" 18 �y o I a Q o o Q It.9s � N p59°d a- 0° I ss o7 sc.z; cJ . " a°A\�ti, 21 �,`� tZ4.43 o s SEl 253RD F cc�\�� ? ,oti�o ro 4N• o ss4s 69 aG�oi4 &C17��f838 Ott `ZO a Ao , 801k0 " bS.47 3A� �� G) \ •, A�zd sR rg ` �\9 17 ti4, 16 , 13 PO �1Q o 1 10prR za s �b a9gS a1°�0 01 I �I �C'� � �,y, �-2y of G� m s��e 1i��c gLot °I V It5.27 'P+ T�GG lob ato :zly1.lD e\i v1 .per ��-e•3S _ ZZf �(/ g9D� F47/ N L ,,,9)�d V•� �5 3'��' ��r 0 ry �� s Sy88 75.04 74 4 `°L� �0010° 2 h k�� 0 4ko ea°c Iti�ey o� p vi oZ 0y o : loo o 19o0a ? 0 4 IJ�S ¢G•SLIt/ Z9g33(P.) �L s des -4r;-Sc.N! SBZ•6i(I 50 Is5 IZ3.33 m t7 70 8457 75D4. 74 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING • KENT ON PROPOSED STREET VACATION WASHJNOYON (with corrected legal description) ADMINISTRATION Portion of 132nd Avenue S.E. Mike Martin Chief Administrative Officer NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the abutting property CITY CLERK owners have petitioned the City Council of the Brenda Jacober,CMC City of Kent to vacate a certain street in the 220 Fourth Ave.S. City of Kent, King County, Washington, described Kent,WA 98032-5895 as follows : Phone:253-856-5725 Fax:253-856-6725 THE AST C.00 FEET OF THE WEST 50.00 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LANDS: THE NORTH Y2 OF THE NWI/4 OF THE SWIA OF THE SWIA AND THE NORTH 20 FEET OF THE WEST 290 FEET OF THE SOUTHI/2 OF THE 1/4 OF THE SW1/4 OF THE SW114 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH,RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Kent has set December 13, 2005 as the date, the hour of 7 : 00 p.m. as the time, and the Council Chambers of the City Hall of the City of Kent as the place, for a hearing upon said petition. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Resolution No. 1713 Brenda Jacobe CMC City Clerk Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City Clerks Office in advance at 253-856-5725 . For TDD relay services, call the Washington Telecommunications Relay Service at 1-800-833-6388. CONSENT CALENDAR 6. City Council Action: Counctlmember 9:::2� moves, Councilmember seconds to approve Consent Calendar Items A through Discussion " ' Action yyY C ' 6A. Approval of Minutes. Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of November 15, 2005. 6B. Approval of Bills. Approval of payment of the bills received through November 15 and paid on November 15 after auditing by the Operations Committee on November 15, 2005. Approval of checks issued for vouchers: ' Date Check Numbers Amount 11/15/05 Wire Transfers 2233-2245 $1,261,310.50 11/15/05 Prepays & 585887 3,850,287.39 11/15/05 Regular 586539 1,121,672.78 Use Tax Payable 1,124.57 $61234,395 24 Approval of checks issued for payroll for October 16 through October 31 and paid on November 4, 2005: Date Check Numbers Amount 11/4/05 Checks 287090-287362 $ 199,619 50 11/4/05 Advices 187540-188230 1,255,88123 Total of Regular Payroll $1455,500.73 Interim Void 282000.282819,283102 283134,283381,283686 11/9/05 Checks 283867,283988,284941 $(1,970.58) Checks 287363-287371 $1,970 58 $0.0 Council Agenda Item No. 6 A-B • Kent City Council Meeting KENT November 15, 2005 .._ _. WASHIHGTON The regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Pro Tern Ranmger Councilmembers present: Clark, Harmon, Raplee, Thomas and White. (CFN-198) Flag Salute. Webelos Pack 725 presented the colors. CHANGES TO THE AGENDA B From the Public. (CFN-198) At the request of audience members, Continued Communications Items A and B were added to the agenda. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A. Economic Development Report. (CFN-198) Economic Development Manager Torgelson announced businesses which are opening in Kent Station and noted that consultants for the Center for Advanced Manufacturing are being interviewed by the City and the Chamber of Commerce. PUBLIC HEARINGS A 2006 Annual Budget (Second Hearing). (CFN-186) Finance Director Nachhnger outlined the 2006 annual budget including revenue sources, operating expenses, and changes made since the first public hearing. Mayor Pro Tem Ranmger opened the public hearing Martin Plys, 3004 S 256th, questioned the use of the golf course by students and Doug Packard, 209 W James, asked about the Leisure Fund There were no further comments from the audience and CLARK MOVED to close the public hearing White seconded and the motion carried. Nachlmger explained the Leisure Fund and the agreement with the school district for Joint use of facilities. B. 2005 Tax Levy for 2006 Budget. (CFN-104) Finance Director Nachinger explained the proposed tax levy which is to be assessed on property in the City. Mayor Pro Tern Rann►ger opened the public hearing There were no comments from the audience and CLARK MOVED to close the public hearing. White seconded and the motion carried C. 2006-2011 Capital Improvement Plan (Second Hearing). (CFN-775) Finance Director Nachhnger outlined the plan, and Mayor Pro Tern Ranmger opened the public hearing Martm Plys, 3004 S 256th, asked about court, parks improvements, police building and budget amendments. Hans Friewald, 11824 SE 270th, voiced concern about the Mill Creek project. Tom Sharp, 24254 143rd Avenue SE, suggested making improvements to Meeker Street a higher priority in the Transportation Plan There were no further comments from the audience and CLARK MOVED to close the public hearing Nachlmger responded to all the questions, Blanchard agreed to talk to Mr Friewald, and Councilmember Thomas pointed out that improvements to Meeker Street would involve getting permission from the Federal Government to build a bridge D Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Include 2006-2011 Capital Improvement Plan. (CFN-377&775) Planning Manager Anderson explained the Capital Facilities Element. Mayor Pro Tern Ranmger opened the public hearing There were no comments from the audience and CLARK MOVED to close the public hearing. White seconded and the motion carried. 1 Kent City Council Minutes November 15, 2005 E. Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Revisions to Kent City Code 12.13, School District Capital Facilities Plans. (CFN-961&775) This public hearing is to consider amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the updated Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way and Auburn School Districts These plans propose to also amend school impact fees outlined in Kent City Code Chapter 12.13. Planning Manager Anderson explained that this issue regards the impacts of residential development on schools. Mayor Pro Tem Ranniger opened the public hearing Mike Newman, Associate Superintendent for the Auburn School District, 915 4th Street NE, Sally f McLean, Chief Financial Officer for the Federal Way School District, 31405 18th Avenue South, and Gwenn Escher-Derdowski, Planning Administrator for the Kent School District, 12033 SE 256th, outlined their plans. There were no further comments from the audience and CLARK MOVED to close the public hearing. White seconded and the motion carried CONSENT CALENDAR CLARK MOVED to approve Consent Calendar Items A through S. White seconded and the motion carried A. Approval of Minutes. (CFN-198) The minutes of the regular Council meeting of November 1, 2005 were approved. B. Approval of Bills. (CFN-104) Approval of payment of the bills received through October 31 and paid on October 31 after auditing by the Operations Committee on November 1, 2005. Approval of checks issued for vouchers: Date Check Numbers Amount 10/31/05 Wire Transfers 2215-2230 $1,230,627.45 10/31/05 Prepays & 585133 741,376.00 10/31/05 Regular 585886 21412,777 93 Use Tax Payable 2,96327 $4,387,744.65 Approval of checks issued for payroll for October 1 through October 15 and paid on October 20, 2005 Date Check Numbers Amount 10/20/05 Checks 286810-287086 $ 212,113 12 10/20/05 Advices 186851-187539 1,240,667 47 Total of Regular payroll $1,452,780 59 10/19/05 Void 286438 ($246.68) 10/19/05 Reissued 287087 $246.68 10/21/05 Void 286561 ($580.20) 10/21/05 Reissued 287088 $590 20 10/28/05 Void 287061 ($136 40) 10/21/05 Reissued 287089 $136.40 Interim Payroll Total S 000 2 Kent City Council Minutes November 15, 2005 C Tourism Contract with Kent Chamber of Commerce. (CFN-1170) The 2006 tourism contract with the Kent Chamber of Commerce for$!8,000 (using lodging tax revenues) was approved. D. 2006 Kent Reporter Contract for Kent Connections Newsletter. (CFN-198) The contract with the Kent Reporter for the purpose of publishing the City of Kent newsletter in 2006 was authorized, subject to the City Attorney approval of contract documents. E. Utility Billing System Replacement. (CFN-104) The Mayor was authorized to sign the contract with Spnngbrook for a new utility billing system aiiu associated implementation services plus other project items within established budgets, subject to City Attorney approval of contract documents. F. Write-Offs for 2005. (CFN-104) The wnte-off of various accounts receivable in the amount of $42,316.25 was authorized. G. WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan Resolution. (CFN-1038) Resolution No 1714 ratifying the Watershed Resource Inventory Area(WRIA) 9 Chinook Salmon Habitat Plan was adopted. H. WRIA 9 Interlocal Extension Agreement. (CFN-1038) The Mayor was authorized to sign an Extension to the Interlocal Agreement for the Watershed Basins within WRIA upon concurrence of the language by the City Attorney and the Public Works Director. I. Project Construction Agreement with Puget Sound Energy. (CFN-1180) The Mayor was authorized to sign the Project Construction Agreement with Puget Sound Energy for the conversion of overhead power to underground for the 116°i Ave. SE Street Improvement Project upon concurrence of the language by the City Attorney and the Public Works Director. J. Joint Utility Trench Agreement with Owest. (CFN-1180) The Mayor was authorized to sign a Joint Trench Agreement with Qwest for work on the I t61h Avenue SE Improvement Project upon concurrence of the language by the Public Works Director and the City Attorney. K. Joint Utility Trench Agreement with Comcast. (CFN-1180) The Mayor was authorized to sign a Joint Trench Agreement with Comcast for work on 116`h Avenue SE Improvement Project upon concurrence of the language by the Public Works Director and the City Attorney L. S. 277th Street Corridor Extension Project (116th Avenue SE). (CFN-1180) Ordinance No. 3767 providing for the acquisition of real property and/or property rights located between Kent- Kangley Road and Southeast 256`h Street adjacent to 1161h Avenue Southeast and located adjacent to Kent-Kangley Road up to 700 feet east of 116`h Avenue Southeast was adopted. This action is being taken in order to construct the underground electrical system and road improvements for the South 2771h Street Corridor Extension Project. M. BNSF Railroad Grade Separation Proiect (CFN-113) Ordinance No 3768 providing for the acquisition of real property and/or property rights located 600 feet east and west of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad tracks adjacent to South 228"h Street was adopted. This action is being taken in order to construct the South 228`h Street roadway underpass 3 Kent City Council Minutes November 15, 2005 I N. Joint Utility Trench Agreement with Owest. (CFN-1134) The Mayor was authorized to sign a Joint Trench Agreement with Qwest for work on the S. 228`h Street BNSF Railroad Grade Separation project upon concurrence of the language by the Public Works Director and the City Attorney O. Joint Utility Trench Agreement with Puget Sound Energy. (CFN-1134) The Mayor was authorized to sign a Joint Trench Agreement with PSE for work on the S. 2281h Street BNSF Railroad Grade Separation project upon concurrence of the language by the Public Works Director and the City Attorney. P. Memorandum of Understanding between City of Kent and BNSF Railroad. (CFN-113) The Mayor was authorized to sign the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad for the S. 2281h St. BNSF Grade Separation Project upon concurrence of the language by the City Attorney and the Public Works Director. Q. 98th Avenue SE Sanitary Sewer Latecomer Agreement. (CFN-485) The Public Works Director was authorized to execute a Sanitary Sewer Latecomer Agreement with TLT Development, LLC for the 98`h Avenue Sanitary Sewer Extension. R 2005 Traffic Striping Project. (CFN-1162) The 2005 Traffic Striping project was accepted as complete and release of retainage to Stripe Rite, Inc. upon standard releases from the state and release of any liens was authorized S. Urban Density Ordinances. (CFN-131&377) Ordinance Nos 3769 relating to the Comprehensive Plan land use and zoning designations being adopted as a result of the City's urban density study, 3770 relating to the zoning text amendments that eliminate the zoning designation of SR-2 as a result of the City's urban density study, and 3771 relating to amendments to the Comprehensive Plan's Land Use Element eliminating SR-2 references and adding a land use designation of SF-4.5,were adopted. BIDS A Financial Services Furniture. (CFN-120) The informal bid opening was held on October 31, 2005, with four(4) bids received The apparent low bid was submitted by Turnkey Business Interiors. The Parks Director recommends authorizing the Mayor to enter into an agreement with Turnkey Business Interiors for the amount of$72,585.33, excluding Washington State Sales Tax, to purchase furniture for the Financial Services Department. RAPLEE SO MOVED Clark seconded and the motion carried REPORTS Council President. (CFN-198) Ranniger announced that the Council will hold a special workshop at 5.30 p in on Tuesday, November 29, to hear recommendations on the Aquatics Center. Operations Committee. (CFN-198) Clark noted that the Committee will meet at 4 00 p.m. on December 6, and that the budget will be on the agenda. Public Safety Committee. (CFN-198) Ranniger noted that the Committee will meet on November 17 at 5 00 p in. 4 Kent City Council Minutes November 15, 2005 Parks and Human Services Committee. (CFN-198) Ranniger noted that the Committee will meet on November 17 at 4.00 p.m. Administrative Reports. (CFN-198) Hodgson reminded the Council of an Executive Session of 1 approximately 20 minutes regarding property negotiations and property disposition, and said action may be taken afterward. CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS A. Police. (CFN-l22) Martin Plys, 3004 S. 256th, said he has chosen to wait until the Mayor's return to make his comments. B. Kent Station,James Street. (CFN-171) Kristi Soderlund, 821 3rd Avenue North, expressed concerns about curbing on James, construction dumpsters and fencing at Kent Station and emergency access to the North Park neighborhood. Blanchard responded to some of the concerns and agreed to check on the others. EXECUTIVE SESSION The meeting recessed to Executive Session at 8.12 p.m. and reconvened at 8:45 p.m. ADJOURNMENT At 8 45 p in THOMAS MOVED to adjourn Raplee seconded and the motion carried. Brenda Jacober, CMC City Clerk 5 Kent City Council Meeting _ Date December 13, 2005 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: 2006 ANNUAL BUDGET— ORDINANCE—ADOPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No. , which adopts the City's 2006 budget as summarized in Exhibit A and includes the previously issued Preliminary Budget document as amended by Exhibit B, which constitutes technical corrections made to the Preliminary Budget. 1 3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Establishes 2006 Budget Expenditure9 _ Revenue? Currently in the Budget? Yes No If no: Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund Amount $ 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6C FINANCE R. 3. Nachlinger, Director Phone 253-856-5260 \40* KENT Fax 253-856-6255 W A S H I N G T G N Address- 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, WA. 98032-5895 November 30, 2005 TO: Kent City Council Operations Committee FROM: R. J. Nachlmger,Finance Director THROUGH- John Hodgson SUBJECT: 2006 Budget Adoption Ordinance MOTION• I move to recommend adoption of an ordinance adopting the 2006 budget. SUMMARY: This ordinance adopts the 2006 budget. The budget to be adopted is summarized in Exhibit A. It includes the Preliminary Budget document as amended by Exhibit B, which includes all adjustments made to the Preliminary Budget since its original publication. BUDGET IMPACT: 2006 Budget BACKGROUND: Council has held two public hearings and two workshops on the 2006 budget All amendments in Exhibit B have been reviewed by the Operations Committee Final adjustments related to the actual property tax levy will be incorporated as soon as we receive final numbers from King County. Kent Council Operations Committee 1 2005 Total Tax Levy Established r 1 ORDINANCE NO. 1 AN ORDINANCE of the city council of the city of Kent, Washington, relating to budgets and finance and adopting the final 2006 fiscal year budget. RECITALS A. The tax estimates and preliminary budget for the city of Kent, Washington, for the 2006 fiscal year have been prepared and filed as provided by law, and the budget has been printed and distributed. B. Notice has been published in the official paper of the city of Kent setting the time and place for hearing and that notice stated that all taxpayers calling at the office of the city clerk would be furnished a copy of the 2006 budget. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE SECTION 1. - awdytAdoption. Pursuant to RCW 35A.33.075, the budget for the 2006 fiscal year, as summarized in Exhibit "A" and as set forth in the 2006 Preliminary Comprehensive Budget, which is amended by Exhibit "B," all of which are incorporated into this ordinance by this reference, is hereby adopted in the amounts and for the purposes established in that budget as the final budget for the city's 2006 fiscal year. 1 2006 Budget Adoption SECTION Z - Transmittal. The finance director shall transmit a complete copy of the final adopted budget to the Division of Municipal Corporations in the Office of the State Auditor and to the Association of Washington Cities. SEC7ION3.- Adjustments. City administration shall administer the Annual Budget and in doing so may authorize adjustments pursuant to RCW 35A.33.120. SECTION4.- Severability If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences t of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTIONS. - Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after the date of passage and publication as provided by law. JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY 2 2006 Budget Adoption PASSED; — ' tbfbY December, 2005. APPROVED: day of December, 2005. PUBLISHED: day of December, 2005. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed 1 by the city council of the city of Kent, Washington, and approved by the mayor of the city of Kent as hereon indicated. (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK i 1 0(]NIIC4DINNJQ1,6iN3et�ypai lUW 6x 3 2006 Budget Adoption 2006 Budget Ordinance Exhibit A Inc(Dec) Beginning Ending In Fund Fund Fund Revenues Expenditures Balance Balance Balance GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS GENERAL FUND 70,866,127 71,344,965 (478,838) 5,708,190 5,229,352 , SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Street 4,468,340 4,493,154 (24,814) 806,206 781,392 Lodging Tax Fund 120,069 160,500 (40,431) 76,042 35,611 Youth/Teen Programs 698,586 654,595 43,991 23,490 67,481 Capital Improvement 10,349,471 11,401,324 (1,051,853) 3,120,915 2,069,062 Criminal Justice 2,259,564 2,750,252 (490,688) 941,387 450699 Environmental Mitigation 235,240 310,682 (75,442) 187,139 111:697 Community Block Grant 879,796 879,796 Other Operating Projects 294,435 315,500 (21,065) 76,599 55,534 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS Voted 1,799,917 1,782,609 17,308 16,279 33,587 LTGO Debt 8,820,278 8,820,278 Special Assessment 3,738,657 4,830,354 (1,091,697) 4,509,774 3,418,077 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS Street Projects 1,357,000 1,357,000 Parks Projects 1,944,000 1,944,000 Other Capital Projects 840,000 840,000 Technology Projects 978,000 978,000 Facilities Projects 510,000 510,000 PROPRIETARY FUNDS ENTERPRISE FUNDS Water 8,916,507 11,378,862 (2,462,355) 9,490,128 7,027,773 Sewerage 24,892,509 25,216,183 (323,674) 1,306,199 982,525 Golf Complex 3,339,274 2,966,470 372,804 (1,248,708) (875,904) INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Equipment Rental&Fire Equipment 3,919,098 5,700,438 (1,781,340) 3,328,559 1,547,219 Central Services 4,886,102 4,969,230 (83,128) 126,067 42,939 Facilities Fund 4,071,503 4,436,129 (364,626) 385,237 20,611 Insurance 14,344,555 13,869,742 474,813 5,418,658 5,893,471 FIDUCIARY FUNDS TRUST AND AGENCY FUNDS Firemen's Pension 186,048 349,000 (162,952) 3,435,434 3,272,482 Economic Development Corp 3,000 7,669 (4,669) 17,352 12,683 TOTAL GROSS BUDGET 174,718,076 182,266,732 (7,548,656) 37,724,947 30,176,291 LESS Internal Service Funds 26,231,492 26,231.492 Other Transfers 16,679,532 16,679,532 TOTAL BUDGET 131,807,052 139,355,708 (7,548,656) 37,724,947 30,176,291 CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON 2006 Budget Ordinance Exhibit B Inc(Dee) Beginning Ending In Fund Fund Fund Revenues Expenditures Balance Balance Balance GOVERNMENTALFUNDS GENERAL FUND 70,866,127 71,344,965 (478,838) 5,708,190 5,229.352 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Street 4,358,340 4,443,154 (84,814) 806,206 721,392 Increased gas tax/Neighborhood demos 110,000 50,000 60,000 60,000 Total Street Fund 4,468,340 4,493,154 (24,814) 806,206 781,392 Lodging Tax Fund 120,069 160,500 (40,431) 76,042 36,611 Youth/Teen Programs 698,586 614,595 83,991 23,490 107,481 School golf program 40,000 (40,000) (40,000) Total Youth/Teen Programs 698,586 654,595 43,991 23,490 67,481 Capital Improvement Fund 10,349,471 10,160,982 188,489 1,880,573 2,069,062 Beginning fund balance/Debt 1,200,342 (1,200,342) 1,240,342 40,000 Neighborhood Study 40,000 (40,000) (40,000) Total Capital Improvement Fund 10,349,471 11,401,324 (1,051,853) 3,120,915 2,069,062 Criminal Justice 2,259,564 2,750,252 (490,688) 941,387 450.699 Environmental Mitigation 235,240 310,682 (75,442) 187,139 111,697 ' Community Block Grant 879,796 879,796 Other Operating Projects 294,436 315,500 (21,065) 76,599 55,534 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS Voted 1,799,917 1,782,609 17,308 16,279 33,687 LTGO Bonds 7,619,936 7,619,936 1,200,342 1,200,342 Total LTGO Bonds 8,820,278 8,820,278 Special Assessment 3,738,657 4,830,354 (1,091,697) 4,609,774 3,418,077 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS Street Projects 1.357,000 1,357.000 Parks Projects 1,944,000 1,944,000 Other Capital Projects 840,000 840,000 Technology Projects 978,000 978,000 Facilities Projects 610,000 510,000 PROPRIETARY FUNDS ENTERPRISE FUNDS Water 8,916,507 11,078.862 (2,162,355) 9,490,128 7,327,773 I Tacoma Intertie fixed costs 300,000 (300,000) (300,000) Total Water Fund 8,916,507 11,378,862 (2,482,355) 9,490,128 7,027,773 Sewerage 24,892,509 25,216,183 (323,674) 1,306,199 982,525 Golf Complex 3,299,274 2,966,470 332,804 (1,248,708) (915,904) School golf program 40,000 40,000 40,000 Total Golf Complex Fund 3,339,274 2,966,470 372,804 (1,248,708) (875,904) CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON 2006 Budget Ordinance Exhibit 8 Inc(Dec) Beginning Ending In Fund Fund Fund Revenues Expenditures Balance Balance Balance INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Equipment Rental 3,919,098 5,683,438 (1,764.340) 3,328,559 1,564,219 Replace Fire vehicle 7631 17,000 (17,000) (17,000) Total Equipment Rental Fund 3,919,098 5,700,438 (1,781,340) 3,328,559 1,547.219 Central Services 4,886,102 4,969,230 (83,128) 126,067 42,939 Facilities Fund 4,071,503 4,436,129 (364,626) 385,237 20,611 Insurance 14,344,555 13,869,742 474,813 5,418,658 5,893,471 FIDUCIARY FUNDS TRUST AND AGENCY FUNDS Firemen's Pension 186,048 349,000 (162,952) 3,436,434 3,272,482 Economic Development Corp 3,000 7,669 (4,669) 17,352 12,683 TOTAL GROSS BUDGET 174,718,076 182,266,732 (7,548,656) 37,724,947 30,176,291 LESS. Internal Service Funds 26.231,492 26,231,492 Other Transfers 16,679,532 16,679,532 TOTAL BUDGET 131,807,052 139,355,708 (7,640,656) 37,724,947 30,176,291 Kent City Council Meeting Date_ December 13, 2005 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: 2005 TAX LEVY ORDINANCES FOR 2006 BUDGET—ADOPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance Nos. and authorizing an increase in property tax and levying the property tax levy for collection in 2006, final numbers subject to minor adjustment upon receipt of the assessed valuation from King County. State law requires a separate ordinance to authorize any increase in property tax. The first ordinance authorizes an increase in the regular property tax to 1% over the previous maximum allowed tax levy. The second ordinance levies the tax for 2006 collection. The estimated levy is $24,6t5,938 for the General Fund and $1,785,000 for the Debt Service funds, for an estimated total of$26,400,938. Final numbers are pending receipt of the assessed valuation from King County. 3. EXHIBITS: Ordinances 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc ) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Establishes the 2006 Budget Expenditure9 _ Revenue? Currently in the Budget? Yes No If no: Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue. Fund Amount $ 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6D -DRAFT- ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the city council of the city of Kent, Washington,authorizing the 2005 property tax levy for the 2006 budget at the previous year's tax levy, with a statutorily allowed one(1) percent increase to partially cover impacts from inflation, together with any increases resulting from the addition of new construction and improvements to property, from any increase in the value of state-assessed property, from the refund fund levy, and from annexed properties. RECITALS A. Pursuant to RCW 84.55.120 and after providing all appropriate notice, the city council held a public hearing on September 20, 2005, to consider the city of Kent's proposed operating and capital budget for the 2006 calendar year, and held a public hearing on November 15, 2005, to address the city's 2005 property tax levy, revenues, and limit factors, as well as the proposed 2006 budget. B. In accordance with RCW 84.55.120, any increase in property tax revenue other than that resulting from the addition of new construction and improvements to property, annexations, and any increase in the value of state-assessed property and the refund fund levy, requires the adoption of a separate ordinance from the tax levy ordinance specifically authorizing the increase in terms of both dollars and percentage. C. The city council finds that to best protect the public health, safety, and welfare, to best protect the city's future property tax levy capacity, to best serve the citizens of Kent by maintaining an appropriate level of service throughout the city, to 1 Tax Levy Adjustment Authorized(1%) -2005 Budget -DRAFT- appropriately discharge the city's expected expenses and obligations, and to best serve the citizens of Kent through a continued commitment to capital improvements throughout the city, a substantial need exists to increase its tax levy over last year. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE SECTIONI,- Redta/slncoroorated. The foregoing recitals are incorporated into this ordinance. SEC7ION2, -Property TaxLevvAuthodzed. In addition to the increase resulting from new construction and improvements to property, from annexations, from any increase in the value of state-assessed property, and from the refund fund levy, the 2005 regular property tax dollar levy for the 2006 budget is authorized at the previous year's property tax levy, plus a one (1) percent increase, representing $240;15 . SECTION 3 - Severability If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. -Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. 2 Tax Levy Adjustment Authorized(1%) - 2005 Budget -DRAFT- ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED: day of December, 2005. APPROVED: day of December, 2005. PUBLISHED: day of December, 2005, I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed by the city council of the city of Kent, Washington, and approved by the mayor of the city of Kent as hereon indicated. (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK PO 3 Tax Levy Adjustment Authorized(1%) - 2005 Budget -DRAFT- ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the city council of the city of Kent, Washington, levying 2005 property taxes for the 2006 budget for the city of Kent. RECITALS ' A. Pursuant to RCW 84.55.120 and after providing all appropriate notice,the City Council held a public hearing on September 20, 2005, to consider the city of Kent's proposed operating and capital budget for the 2006 calendar year, and held a public hearing on November 15, 2005, to address the city's 2005 property tax levy, revenues, ! and limit factors, as well as the proposed 2006 budget. ! B. In accordance with RCW 84.55.120, any increase in property tax revenue other than that resulting from the addition of new construction and improvements to ' property, annexations, and any increase in the value of state-assessed property and the refund fund levy, requires the adoption of a separate ordinance from the tax levy ordinance specifically authorizing the increase in terms of both dollars and percentage. ! C. By separate ordinance, the city council has adopted an ordinance to establish a one (1) percent increase in property tax revenue to be levied and collected in year 2006. D. Pursuant to RCW 84 52.010 and WAC 458-12-365, taxes shall be levied in specific dollar amounts. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 1 Property Tax Levied(1%) 2006 Budget -DRAFT- ORDINANCE SECTION I. —Redta&Incorporated. The foregoing recitals are incorporated into this ordinance. SECTION 2. —Properly Tax Levied. There is hereby levied against the assessed value of the property in the city of Kent, Washington, a tax for the city's 2006 budget in the following amounts for the following funds: A. For the General Fund, for the purpose of paying the general expenses of municipal government: Levy per $1,000 of ' assessed valuation Dollar Amount Fund _(estimated) estimated General Fund �"'"'` u 6g1�`5�r }y�.rFV.t�Git r. _ YLX.74Jt B. For Voted Bond Interest and Redemption Fund, for the purpose of paying debt service in the following amounts for the following funds: Levy per $1,000 of assessed valuation Dollar Amount Fund estimated General Obligation Refunding (Public Safety and Senior Housing) C. Total General Fund and Voted Bond Interest and Redemption Fund: Levy per $1,000 of assessed valuation Dollar Amount (estimated) (estimated TOTAL LEVY .;w „ J261406..9 I SECTION3, -Limitation on Lev. The application of the General Fund levy shall be consistent with and shall not result in a tax revenue in excess of the limitation imposed by RCW 84.55.010. SECTION 4. - Adiustments. City administration shall administer the Annual Budget and in doing so may authorize ad]ustments pursuant to RCW 35A.33.120. 2 Property Tax Levied(1%) 2006 Budget ' -DRAFT- ' SECTIONS. -Severability If any one or more sections,subsections,or sentences ' of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION6. -Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five ' (5) days from and after its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. t 1 JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK ' APPROVED AS TO FORM: TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY 1 ' 3 Property Tax Levied(1%) 2006 Budget -DRAFT- ' PASSED: day of December, 2005. ' APPROVED: day of December, 2005. PUBLISHED: day of December, 2005. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed by the city council of the city of Kent, Washington, and approved by the mayor of the city of Kent ' as hereon indicated. (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK ' P�[A�DIW EITaxle 2"he ' i 4 Property Tax Levied(1%) , 2006 Budget Kent City Council Meeting Date December 13. 2005 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO INCLUDE 2006- 2011 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE— ADOPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No. _ _ relating to CPA-2005-3 amending the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to include the Capital Improvement Plan for 2006-2011. 3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance and its exhibits referenced therein 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee and Staff (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? X Revenue? X Currently in the Budget? Yes X No If no: Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue. Fund Amount $ ' 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds ' DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda ' Item No 6E ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the city council of the city of ' Kent, Washington, amending the city of Kent Comprehensive Plan to amend the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to reflect a six-year plan for capital facilities projects (2006-2011) (CPA-2005-3). RECITALS ' A. The Washington State Growth Management Act("GMA") requires internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements and the plans from other jurisdictions. B. To assure that comprehensive plans remain relevant and up to date, the GMA allows amendments to the capital facilities element of comprehensive plans ' concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a city budget(RCW 36.70A.130(2)(111)). C. The city of Kent has established procedures for amending the Comprehensive Plan in chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code, allowing amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the city's budget and allowing the city council to hold the public hearing instead of the Land Use and Planning Board. ' D. The city of Kent Finance Department has submitted proposed amendments to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to identify a six-year plan for capital facilities projects, including costs and revenue sources. ' 1 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Capita/Impro vement Plan 2006-2011 E. After providing appropriate public notice,the city council of the city of Kent considered the six-year plan for capital facilities and the requested comprehensive plan amendment and conducted public hearings on the same on September 20, 2005, and November 15, 2005. i F. On September 30, 2005, the city provided the State of Washington the t required sixty (60) day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 of the city's proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The sixty (60) ' day notice period has lapsed. G. On December 13, 2005, the city council for the city of Kent approved the , Capital Facilities Element amendment (CPA-2005-3) to reflect a six-year plan for capital , facilities projects (2006-2011). NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES ' HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE ' SECTION 1, - Amendment. The Capital Facilities Element of the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to reflect a six-year plan for capital facilities ' projects (2006-2011), as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached and incorporated by this reference (CPA-2005-3). ' SECTION 2, - Severabi/itv If any one or more sections, sub-sections, or ' sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain ' in full force and effect. i 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendments ' Capita/Improvement Plan 2006-2011 t SECTION 3, - Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after the date of passage as provided by law. ' JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: ' BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK ' APPROVED AS TO FORM: TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY 1 PASSED: day of December, 2005. APPROVED: day of December, 2005. PUBLISHED: day of December, 2005. ' I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed by the city council of the city of Kent, Washington, and approved by the mayor of the city of Kent as hereon indicated. BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK (SEAL) Y tlNl\ppIH4N3{fmrypbMraW{apollnpmeRantWS1911MC i ' 3 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Capita/Improvement Plan 2006-2011 1 1 ii i � EXHIBIT "A" i 1 1 2006 - 2011 Capital Improvement Program Sources of Funds Amounts in 000's Capital Improvement Fund 16% I Other Sources 35% Street Fund 6% Utility Funds 11% Facilities Fund 2% Bond Proceeds 2% Grants 27% Sources of Funds 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total Capital Improvement Fund 4,436 3,287 4,224 4,165 4,221 4,756 25,089 Street Fund 2,096 2,324 1,268 1,203 1,304 1,256 9,451 Utility Funds 4,266 1,834 1,759 2,360 2,858 4,015 17,092 Facilities Fund 335 710 490 455 405 605 3,000 Grants 1,530 39,155 1,055 205 1,405 50 43,400 Bond Proceeds 2,850 2,850 Other Funding Sources 239 51,430 1,000 4,610 410 111 57,800 Total Sources of Funds 15,752 98,740 9,796 12,998 10,603 10,793 158,682 2006 - 2011 Capital Improvement Program , Projects Forecast , Amounts in 000's General Government 9% Utility Fund Projects 8% Parks, Recreation & Community Services Transportation 12% " 63% Public Safety , 8% Projects 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total Transportation 2,632 92,124 1,268 1,203 1,304 1,256 99,787 Public Safety 1,128 1,069 2,384 5,911 1,215 730 12,437 Parks, Recreation 6,189 2,318 2,995 2,194 3,771 1,917 19,384 & Community Services General Government 1,537 1,395 1,390 1,780 1,905 6,625 14,632 Utility Fund Projects 4,266 1,834 1,759 1,910 2,408 265 12,442 Total Projects 15,752 98,740 9,796 12,998 10,603 10,793 158,682 , ' Parks, Rec & Comm Services 2006 - 2011 Capital Improvement Program _�- - - Amounts in Thousands _Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Sources of Funds WA State Grant 3,950 800 625 1,000 200 1,325 ' King County Grant 150 50 50 50 Other Grant 400 330 30 5 5 30 Donations/Contributions 137 110 5 5 5 6 6 LTGO Bonds 2,850 2,850 Youth &Teen Revenues 55 55 CIP Revenues 1,260 185 95 295 295 295 95 CIP REET2 Revenues 9,639 1,785 1,438 1,510 1,584 1,661 1,661 Other Funding Sources 943 74 125 130 105 404 105 Total Sources of Funds 19,384 6 189 2,318 2 995 2,194 3,771 1,91.7 Projects Funded_ ' Facilities Parks Equipment 90 90 Community Parks Kent Memorial Park Renovations 1,285 22 642 621 Mill Creek/Earthworks Renovations 400 400 Valley Floor Athletic Complex Acq& Dev 500 500 Riverwalk/Riverview Park Development 1,275 775 500 Urban Forestry 35 10 5 5 10 5 1 Lake Meridian Boat Ramp Renovation 55 55 Demolition of Rental Houses 25 25 Wilson PlayfieldsAcgwsition 1,200 400 400 400 Life Cycle-Irrigation 200 25 50 25 25 50 25 East Hill Skate Park 300 300 Three Friends Fishing Hole 50 50 Service Club Ballfields 1,010 910 100 Adopt-A-Park 240 40 40 40 40 40 40 Trails 54 9 9 9 9 9 9 228th Corridor Park/Tradhead 50 50 Commons Playfield Renovations 1,368 18 350 1,000 West Fenwick Renovations 900 400 500 Clark Lake Development 1,067 525 42 500 ' Van Doren's Park Improvements 150 150 Soccer Field Renovation 32 32 Lifecycle Renovations ILife Cycle- Play Equipment 325 50 75 50 50 50 50 Parks, Rec & Comm Services ' 2006 - 2011 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands ' Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 , Life Cycle-Ballfields 200 25 50 25 25 50 25 Life Cycle 1,980 250 346 346 346 346 346 Neighborhood Parks , Kronisch Park Development 42 42 Tudor Square Renovations 55 55 132nd Street Park Development 765 300 465 West Hill Park Development 720 720 Pine Tree Park 20 20 S 272nd St Neighborhood Park Develop 1,075 25 1,050 Planning, Architect, Engineer Master Plans 60 10 10 10 10 10 10 1 Architect/Engineering 136 15 25 25 25 25 21 Other Parks, Rec& Comm Svc Town Square 3,000 3,000 , Grant Matching Funds/Land Acq 570 95 95 95 95 95 95 Eagle Scout Projects 150 25 25 25 25 25 25 Total Projects Funded 19,384 6,189 - 2 318 2,995 2,194 - 3,77.1_ 1917 i 1 1 1 i 1 t 1 1 General Government 2006 - 2011 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands — - --- - Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Sources of Funds CIP Revenues 6,982 1,202 685 900 875 1,050 2,270 Water Revenues 1,550 150 150 1,250 Sewer Revenues 1,550 150 150 1,250 Drainage Revenues 1,550 150 150 1,250 Facilities Revenues 3,000 335 710 490 455 405 605 Total Sources of Funds 14,632 1,537 1.395 1.390 1,780 1,905 _6,625 ' Projects Funded Facilities Emergency Facility Repairs(Lifecycle) 850 100 100 150 150 150 200 Roof Repairs (Lifecycle) 1,125 390 185 150 100 300 Floor Covering Replacements(Lifecycle) 420 45 75 75 75 75 75 ' Facility Painting (Lifecycle) 450 25 25 100 100 100 100 Sealcoat Parking Lots(Lifecycle) 332 17 75 60 60 60 60 HVAC Lifecylce Replacements(Lifecycle) 300 60 60 60 120 Miscellaneous Furniture(Lifecycle) 395 45 45 70 70 95 70 Kent Commons Upgrades 800 300 75 125 125 125 50 Training Range-Mamt/Repav Bullet Trap 120 40 40 40 Russell Road Maintenance Facility 6,200 450 600 5,150 Senior Center Upgrades 210 150 35 25 Parks&Law Space Renovation 280 280 Technology ERP System Upgrade 3,000 500 500 500 500 500 500 Other General Government Comprehensive Plan EIS Update 150 75 75 Total Projects Funded =14,632 1,537 1,395 1_,390 1,780 1,905 6,625 I I 1 1 t Public Safety 2006 - 2011 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands , Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Sources of Funds CIP Revenues 7,072 1,128 1,069 1,519 1,411 1,215 730 Other Funding Sources 5,365 865 4,500 , Total Sources of Funds 12,437 1,128 1,069 2.384 5,911 1,215 730 Projects Funded , Fire and Emergency Services Exhaust Extraction Systems 174 55 34 29 56 , Upgrade Sleeping Qtrs&Restrooms 425 25 200 200 Valley Com Command Point Mobile Mapping 28 28 Electronic MIRF Collection Protect 50 50 Breathing Apparatus Replacement Program 1,670 590 120 120 120 120 600 Fire Equipment Replacement Fund 1,400 400 400 300 200 100 , Replacement Radio Fund 865 865 Police Services Records Renovation-Records Remodel 25 25 Speciality Police Vehicle Storage 150 50 50 50 Inmate Barcode Scan/Kiosk 120 40 40 40 Lockers/Inmate Storage/File Storage 150 50 50 50 , Computer Forensics Enhancements 25 25 Alarm&Surveillance Equipment Upgrade 25 25 Area Video Surveillance 100 25 25 25 25 Portable Radios-Replacement 200 50 50 50 50 Patrol Less Than Lethal Equipment 150 50 50 50 , Crime Scene Van Replacemnt&Equip Upgrade 75 75 HQ Livescan 50 25 25 Immobilizer Equipment for Mentally III 75 25 25 25 Pursuit Intervention Technique Equipment 50 25 25 Defribrillators for Patrol Vehicles 100 50 50 Second Vehicle for Training Staff 105 35 35 35 ' Satellite Processing of Traffic NOI's 200 100 100 Investigations Crime Scene Equip Upgrade 50 25 25 ' AR-15 Rifles 225 75 75 75 Mini Crime Lab 50 25 25 Vehicle for Programs/Admm Staff 35 35 , Patrol Video/Audio Record Equip 150 30 30 30 30 30 Take Home Cars-Pilot Program 200 200 Police/Fire Training Center Public Safety 2006 - 2011 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Remodel Range Targeting System 50 50 Training Center Classroom Upgrades 50 25 25 Citywide Driving Simulator 300 100 100 100 Other Public Safety Municipal Court Budding 4,500 4,500 Camera Upgrade/Renovations 120 30 30 30 30 Carpet/Furniture 50 25 25 Annex Work Crew Tools and Equipment 75 25 25 25 Replace Laundry Equipment 40 40 Work Crew Van/Trailer Equipment 180 60 60 60 I Replace Old Radios at CKCF 50 50 Optical Identification Scanning 100 100 ITotal Projects Funded 12,437 __1,128 12069 _2,384 =5,911 1,215 730 1 Transportation 2006 - 2011 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Sources of Funds Federal Grant 400 400 WA State Grant 34,000 34,000 , Other Grant 4,500 4,500 Street Revenues 9,451 2,096 2,324 1,268 1,203 1,304 1,256 CIP Revenues 136 136 Other Funding Sources 51,300 51,300 Total Sources of Funds 99,787 2,632 92,124 1,268 1,203 1,304 1,256 i Projects Funded Arterials , 2nd Avenue(Smith - Meeker) 450 450 Corridors SR 167 Study 100 100 Intersections 116th &248th Intersection Improvement 625 625 212th Grade Separation 50,000 50,000 Willis Grade Separation 40,000 40,000 124th Ave and SE 248th St Improvements 250 250 Other Transportation Signal Battery Backup 240 120 120 Slurry Seal Program 425 75 50 75 75 75 75 Transportation Master Plan 850 425 425 Scanner 26 26 Citywide Aerial Flight 110 110 Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Installation 1,300 200 200 150 250 250 250 Bike Paths 300 50 50 50 50 50 50 Miscellaneous Asphalt Overlays 3,857 582 605 629 654 680 707 Shopper Shuttle 225 35 35 35 40 40 40 Neighborhood Traffic Control 225 75 75 75 , Street Channelization Program 534 89 89 89 89 89 89 Pavement Rating Survey 90 15 15 15 15 15 15 City Wide Guardrail &Safety Improvement 180 30 30 30 30 30 30 Total Projects Funded 99,787 2,632 _92,124 1,268 1,203 1 304 1,_2.56 i i Utilities 2006 - 2011 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands --'- u - Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Sources of Funds Water Revenues 2,500 1,900 300 300 1 Drainage Revenues 9,942 2,366 1,534 1,459 1,910 2,408 —265 Total Sources of Funds _12,442 4,266 1,834 1,759 1.9.1_0 2,408 265 Projects Funded Stormwater Management Soos Creek Basin Improvements 4,537 834 786 478 523 1,916 Mill Creek 1,600 200 500 900 Miscellaneous Environmental Protects 265 265 NPDES 1,075 202 208 216 222 227 Miscellaneous Drainage Improvement 1,590 265 265 265 265 265 265 Drainage Improvements w/Road Improvement 875 800 75 Water Supply & Distribution Rock Creek Mitigation Projects 2,500 1,900 300 300 1 Total Projects Funded 12,442 4 266 1,834 _1,759 1,910 2,408 265 i 1 1 1 t Env 93-51 1 City of Kent Charlene Anderson, AICP, Planning Mgr KENT Planning Services ADOPTION OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS IAdoption Document(s)• EIS Description of current proposal. The action proposed by the City consists of the adoption of an updated Capital Improvement Piogram concurrent with the 2006 city operating budget. The Capital Improvement Plan is an element of the City's Comprehensive Plan iProponent- City of Kent Location of proposal: The proposal is a city-wide action. Title of document(S) being adopted- City of Kent Comprehensive Plan Environmental Impact Statement Draft (July 1994)and Final (January 1995)—Prepared by the City of Kent. Description of document(or poition) being adopted. The City of Kent Comprehensive Plan EIS is being adopted in total. This document evaluated three different land use alternatives for the city The analysis evaluated the type and range of impacts to the environment associated with each land use alternative and associated development regulations If the document has been challenged (WAC 197-11-630), please describe: The document was not challenged Document availability: This document is available for review at the City of Kent Planning Services office, 220 Fourth Ave S, Kent, WA 98032 fiom 8.00 am to 5.00 pm. We have identified and adopted this document as being appropriate for this proposal after independent review Along with the addendum, this document meets our environmental review needs for the current proposal and will accompany the proposal to the decisionmaker(s). Name of agency adoptinir the document City of Kent Contact person/Responsible Official: Kim Marousek, AICP(253) 856-5436 Principal Planner City of Kent Community Development Dept 220 Fourth Ave South 1 Kent, WA 98032 Date- 1 I/1/05 Signature: ( ��� S\PeriiiiiNPla11\Euvl,2(1OS%Ci PadupLOO-01 I due elL, 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ' Fred N Satterstrom, AICP, Director PLANNING SERVICES , Charlene Anderson,AICP, Manager • Phone 253-856-5454 KENT Fax 253-856-6454 WASHINGTON Address 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent,WA 98032-5895 CITY OF KENT ADDENDUM TO THE KENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Responsible Official- Kim Marousek SCOPE The City of Kent has completed environmental analysis, pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), for an update to the city's 2006-201 1 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) The update to the CIP was reviewed along with the city's 2006 operating budget as provided by RCW 36.70A.130. The GMA requires cities and counties to approve and maintain a six (6) year capital facilities plan which includes requirements for specific types of capital facilities, measurable levels-of-service (LOS) standards, financial feasibility, and assurance that adequate facilities ate provided as population and employment growth occurs. Kent's annual budget document and six-year CIP fulfill the GMA requirement for facilities planning In addition, these documents serve as a foundation for the city's fiscal management and eligibility for giants and loans. The CIP and annual budget, along with the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan provide coordination among the city's many plans for capital improvements The annual budget and six- year CIP contain broad goals and specific financial policies that guide and implement the provisions for adequate public services and facilities. The six-year CIP is a funding mechanism to implement projects and programs identified um the City's Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan contains goals and policies related to the provision and maintenance of public services and capital facilities which are necessary to support the projected growth over the next twenty (20) years The goals and policies of the Capital Facilities Element are consistent with the Land Use, Transportation and Parks and Open Space Elements. The Comprehensive Plan EIS, draft and final, evaluated the growth potential as identified to the City's Comprehensive Plan. The adoption of the six-year CIP, concurrent with the city's annual budget, is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan EIS analysts as the types of projects and programs identified in the CIP are specifically related to the growth projections in the Comprehensive Plan and EIS SEPA COMPLIANCE In October 1993, the City of Kent issued a Determination of Significance (DS) and Notice of Scoping for the Comprehensive Plan (ENV-93-51) After a series of public meetings, a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) was issued on July 18, 1994 for the Draft Comprehensive Plan, issued on the same date. The DEIS was disti ibuted to City Council and Planning Commission members, adjacent jurisdictions, affected agencies and other parties of interest After comments on the DEIS were solicited and reviewed, a Final Environmental Impact Statement(FEIS)was issued and distributed on January 30, 1995. Comprehensive Plan EIS-Addendum Capital Impi ovement Progiam 2006-201 1 This Addendum to the Kent Comprehensive Plan EIS evaluates the adoption of the six-year CIP. No additional Impacts are identified since CIP implements. piolecW_zrLd programs_ w iIdentified and evaluated in the City's Comprehensive Plan and Ceni-pr-eltenstve441an-EIS. -- - STATEMENT OF CONSISTENCY Future projects associated with the CIP will be Subject to and shall be consistent with the following City of Kent Comprehensive Plan, the Kent City Code, International Fire Code, international Building Code, Public Works Standaids and all other applicable laws and ordinances in etfect at the time a complete project pennn apphcatiun Is filed ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW-BACKGROUND The City of Kent has followed the process of phased environmental review as It undertakes actions to Implement the Comprehensive Plan. The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and rules established for the act, WAC 197-1 1, outline procedures for the use of existing environmental documents and preparing addenda to environmental decisions. Nonproject Documents - An EIS prepared for a comprehensive plan, development regulation, or other bioad based policy documents are considered"non-project;' or programmatic in nature (see WAC 197-11-704) These are distinguished from EISs or environmental documents prepared for specific project actions, such as a building permit or a road construction project The purpose of a non-project EIS is to analyze proposed alternatives and to provide environmental consideration and mitigation prior to adoption of an alternative. It is also a document that discloses the process used in evaluating alternatives to decision-makers and citizens Phrased Review-SEPA rules allow environmental review to be phased so that review coincides with meaningful points In the planning and decision making process, (WAC 197-1 1-060(5)). Broader environmental documents may be followed by narrower documents that incorporate general discussion by reference and concentrate solely on issues specific to that proposal. SEPA rules also clearly state that agencies shall use a variety of mechanisms, including addenda, adoption and incorporation by reference, to avoid duplication and excess paperwork. Future projects identified and associated with the implementation of the Capital Improvement Program may require individual and separate environmental review, pursuant to SEPA Such review will occur when a specific project is identified. Prior Environmental Documenis - The City of Kent issued a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Comprehensive Plan on July 18, 1994 (#ENV-93-51). The DEIS analyzed three comprehensive plan land use alternatives, and recommended mitigation measures, which were used in preparing comprehensive plan policies The preferred land use alternative which was incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan was most closely related to Alternative 2 of the DEIS, (the mixed-use alternative) A Final Environmental impact Statement(FEIS) was Issued on January 30, 1995, and the Comprehensive Plan was adopted by the City Council on April 18, 1995. Scope of Addendum -As outlined in the SEPA rules, the purpose of an addendum is to provide envnonmental analysis with respect to the described actions This analysis builds upon the Comprehensive Plan EIS but does not substantially change the identified impacts and analysis, therefore it is prudent to utilize the addendum process as outlined in WAC-197-1 1-600(4)(c) ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS All environmental elements were adequately addressed within the parameters of the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan EIS, draft and final Further, subsequent "project" actions would require the submittal of sepaiate environmental checklists, pursuant to SEPA, which will be ' Page 2 of 3 Comprehentiive Plan EIS—Addendum Capital improvement 1'togtani 2006-2011 analyzed for consistency with the otiginal mitigating conditions and may require new t mitigation based upon site-specific conditions The adoption of the six-year CIP implements goals and policies identified in the City's Capital , Facilities Element of the Compichensive Plan Specifically, the CIP implements the following: Goal CF-1 —As the City of Kent continues to grow and develop, ensure that an adequate supply 1 and range of public services and capital facilities are available to provide satisfactory standards Of public health and safety. , Policy CFI 2 — Ensure that public services and capital facilities needs are addressed in updates to the Capital Facilities Plans and Capital Impiovement Programs, and development regulations as appropriate Goal CF-4 — Ensure that appropriate Funding sources are available to acquire or bond for the provisions of needed public services and facilities Ii. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION A. SUMMARY 1 Kent City Code section 11 03.510 identifies plans and policies from which the City may draw substantive mitigation under the State Environmental Policy Act. This nonprotect action has been evaluated in light of those substantive plans and policies as well as within the overall analysis completed for the City's Comprehensive Plan US B. DECISION The City of Kent Comprehensive Plan EIS, draft and final, provided analysis with regard to the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan elements, goals and policies This includes the implementation of the Capital Facilities Element and Capital Improvement Programs The City has reviewed the 2006-201 l CIP and has found it to be consistent with the range, types and magnitude of impacts and corresponding mitigation outlined in the Comprehensive Plan EIS. The adoption of the six-year CIP does not substantially change any identified related impacts in the Comprehensive Plan EIS. This analysis and subsequent addendum did not identify any new significant impacts ' associated with the adoption of the 2006-201 1 CIP. Thcrefoie, this addendum, combined with the Comprehensive Plan EIS adequately evaluates potential adverse environmental impacts and provides appropriate mitigation for this nonprotect action Based upon this analysts, a separate threshold determination is not required This document and corresponding environmental record may be utilized in the future in conjunction with environmental review for future projects identified in the CIP in accordance with the , guidelines provided by WAC 197-1 1 Dated: November I, 2005 Signatute. (__le«r{(:,<< Cl` ( �• ��' / Kim Marousek,AiCP, Responsible Official AM ynN lRvnuN'ImiUn NIIMb('ll'uldvxLmtl✓.nII Jn i 1 1 Page 3 of 3 1 RCW 36 70A.020 Planning goals The following goals are adopted to guide the development and adoption of comprehensive plans and development regulations of those counties and cities that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36 70A 040 The following goals are-not listed ,n order of pnonty and shall be used exclusively for the purpose of guiding the development of comprehensive"plans and development regulations (1)Urban growth Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner (2) Reduce sprawl Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling,low-density development (3)Transportation Encourage efficient multimodal transportation systems that are based on regional priorities and coordinated with county and city comprehensive plans (4) Housing Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population of this state, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage preservation of existing housing stock (5) Economic development Encourage economic development throughout the state that is consistent with adopted comprehensive plans, promote economic opportunity for all citizens of this state, especially for unemployed and for disadvantaged persons, promote the retention and expansion of existing businesses and recruitment of new businesses, recognize regional differences impacting economic development opportunities, and encourage growth in areas experiencing insufficient economic growth, all within the capacities of the state's natural resources, public services, and public facilities (6) Property rights Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation having been made The property rights of landowners shall be protected from arbitrary and discriminatory actions (7) Permits Applications for both state and local government permits should be processed in a timely and fair manner to ensure predictability (8) Natural resource industries Maintain and enhance natural resource-based industries, including productive timber, agricultural, and fisheries industries Encourage the conservation of productive forest lands and productive agricultural lands, and discourage incompatible uses (9) Open space and recreation Retain open space, enhance recreational opportunities, conserve fish and wildlife habitat, increase access to natural resource lands and water, and develop parks and recreation facilities (10) Environment Protect the environment and enhance the state's high quality of life, including air and water quality, and the availability of water (11)Citizen participation and coordination Encourage the involvement of citizens in the planning process and ensure coordination between communities and jurisdictions to reconcile conflicts (12)Public facilities and services Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards (13) Historic preservation Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites, and structures, that have historical or archaeological significance [2002 c 154§1,1990 1 st ex s c 17§21 S IPermitlPlanlCompPlanAmdments120051CIP 120605_0psComm1ttee_RCW36 70A 020 doc RCW 36 70A.070 Comprehensive plans--Mandatory elements. The comprehensive plan of a county or city that is required or chooses to plan under RCW 36 70A 040 shall consist of a map or maps,and descriptive text covering objectives, principles, and standards used to develop the I comprehensive plan The plan shall be an internally consistent document and all elements shall be consistent with the future land use map A comprehensive plan shall be adopted and amended with pubTicparticipatoon as provided in RCW 36 70A 140 Each comprehensive plan shall include a plan,scheme,or design for each of the following. (1)A land use element designating the proposed general distribution and general location and extent of the uses of land, where appropriate,for agriculture,timber production, housing, commerce, industry, recreation, open spaces, general aviation airports, public utilities, public facilities, and other land uses The land use element shall include population densities, building intensities,and estimates of future population growth The land use element shall provide for protection of the quality and quantity of ground water used for public water supplies Wherever possible, the land use element should consider utilizing urban planning approaches that promote physical activity Where applicable,the land use element shall review drainage,flooding,and storm water run-off in the area and nearby jurisdictions and provide guidance for corrective actions to mitigate or cleanse those discharges that pollute waters of the state, including Puget Sound or waters entering Puget Sound (2)A housing element ensuring the vitality and character of established residential neighborhoods that (a) Includes an inventory and analysis of existing and projected housing needs that identifies the number of housing unds necessary to manage projected growth, (b)includes a statement of goals, policies,objectives, and mandatory provisions for the preservation, improvement, and development of housing, including single-family residences, (c) identifies sufficient land for housing, including, but not limited to, government-assisted housing, housing for low- income families, manufactured housing, multifamily housing,and group homes and foster care facilities, and(d) makes adequate provisions for existing and projected needs of all economic segments of the community (3)A capital facilities plan element consisting of (a)An inventory of existing capital facilities owned by public entities, showing the locations and capacities of the capital facilities, (b)a forecast of the future needs for such capital facilities, (c)the proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new capital facilities, (d)at least a six-year plan that will finance such capital facilities within projected funding capacities and clearly identifies sources of public money for such purposes, and (e)a requirement to reassess the land use element if probable funding falls short of meeting existing needs and to ensure that the land use element, capital facilities plan element,and financing plan within the capital facilities plan element are coordinated and consistent Park and recreation facilities shall be included in the capital facilities plan element (4)A utilities element consisting of the general location, proposed location, and capacity of all existing and proposed utilities, including, but not limited to, electrical lines,telecommunication lines,and natural gas lines I (5)Rural element Counties shall include a rural element including lands that are not designated for urban growth, agriculture,forest,or mineral resources The following provisions shall apply to the rural element (a)Growth management act goals and local circumstances Because circumstances vary from county to county, in establishing patterns of rural densities and uses,a county may consider local circumstances, but shall develop a written record explaining how the rural element harmonizes the planning goals in RCW 36 70A 020 and meets the requirements of this chapter (b) Rural development The rural element shall permit rural development,forestry,and agriculture in rural areas The rural element shall provide for a variety of rural densities, uses,essential public facilities, and rural governmental services needed to serve the permitted densities and uses To achieve a variety of rural densities and uses, counties may provide for clustering,density transfer, design guidelines, conservation easements, and other innovative techniques that will accommodate appropriate rural densities and uses that are not characterized by urban growth and that are consistent with rural character (c)Measures governing rural development The rural element shall include measures that apply to rural development and protect the rural character of the area,as established by the county, by (i)Containing or otherwise controlling rural development, (u)Assuring visual compatibility of rural development wth the surrounding rural area; (in)Reducing the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low-density development in the rural area, (iv)Protecting critical areas, as provided in RCW 36 70A 060, and surface water and ground water resources, and (v) Protecting against conflicts with the use of agncuftural,forest, and mineral resource lands designated under RCW 36 70A 170. (d) Limited areas of more intensive rural development Subject to the requirements of this subsection and except as otherwise specifically provided in this subsection(5)(d),the rural element may allow for limited areas of more intensive rural development, including necessary public facilities and public services to serve the limited area as follows (i)Rural development consisting of the mfill, development, or redevelopment of existing commercial, industrial, i residential, or mixed-use areas,whether characterized as shoreline development,villages, hamlets, rural activity centers, or crossroads developments (A)A commercial, industrial, residential, shoreline,or mixed-use area shall be subject to the requirements of L (d)(ro)of this subsection, but shall not be subject to the requirements of(c)(u)and(w)of this subsection (B)Any development or redevelopment other than an industrial area or an industrial use within a mixed-use area or an industrial area under this subsection(5)(d)(i)must be principally designed to serve the existing and projected rural population (C)Any development or redevelopment in terms of building size, scale, use,or intensity shall be consistent with the character of the existing areas Development and redevelopment may include changes in use from vacant land or a previously existing use so long as the new use conforms to the requirements of this subsection(5), (u)The intensification of development on lots containing,or new development of, small-scale recreational or tourist uses, including commercial facilities to serve those recreational or tourist uses,that rely on a rural location and setting, but that do not include new residential development A small-scale recreation or tourist use is not required to be principally designed to serve the existing and projected rural population Public services and public facilities shall be limited to those necessary to serve the recreation or tourist use and shall be provided in a manner that does not permit low-density sprawl, (u)The intensification of development on lots containing isolated nonresidential uses or new development of isolated cottage industries and isolated small-scale businesses that are not principally designed to serve the existing and projected rural population and nonresidential uses, but do provide job opportunities for rural residents Rural counties may allow the expansion of small-scale businesses as long as those small-scale businesses conform with the rural character of the area as defined by the local government according to"RCW 36 70A 030(14) Rural counties may also allow new small-scale businesses to utilize a site previously occupied by an existing business as long as the new small-scale business conforms to the rural character of the area as defined by the local government according to*RCW 36 70A 03004) Public services and public facilities shall be limited to those necessary to serve the isolated nonresidential use and shall be provided in a manner that does not permit low-density sprawl, (iv)A county shall adopt measures to minimize and contain the existing areas or uses of more intensive rural development,as appropriate, authorized under this subsection Lands included in such existing areas or uses shall not extend beyond the logical outer boundary of the existing area or use,thereby allowing a new pattern of low- density sprawl Existing areas are those that are clearly identifiable and contained and where there is a logical boundary delineated predominately by the built environment, but that may also include undeveloped lands if limited as provided in this subsection The county shall establish the logical outer boundary of an area of more intensive rural development In establishing the logical outer boundary the county shall address(A)the need to preserve the character of existing natural neighborhoods and communities, (B)physical boundaries such as bodies of water, streets and highways, and land forms and contours, (C)the prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries, and (D) the ability to provide public facilities and public services in a manner that does not permit low-density sprawl, (v) For purposes of(d)of this subsection, an existing area or existing use is one that was in existence (A)On July 1, 1990, in a county that was initially required to plan under all of the provisions of this chapter, (B)On the date the county adopted a resolution under RCW 36 70A 040(2), in a county that is planning under all of the provisions of this chapter under RCW 36 70A 040(2),or (C)On the date the office of financial management certifies the county's population as provided in RCW 36 70A 040(5), in a county that is planning under all of the provisions of this chapter pursuant to RCW 36 70A 040(5) (e) Exception This subsection shall not be interpreted to permit in the rural area a major industrial development or a master planned resort unless otherwise specifically permitted under RCW 36 70A 360 and 36 70A 365 (6)A transportation element that implements, and is consistent with,the land use element (a)The transportation element shall include the following subelements (i)Land use assumptions used in estimating travel, (ii)Estimated traffic impacts to state-owned transportation facilities resulting from land use assumptions to assist the department of transportation in monitoring the performance of state facilities,to plan improvements for the facilities, and to assess the impact of land-use decisions on state-owned transportation facilities, (in)Facilities and services needs, including. 1 (A)An inventory of air,water,and gCound-transportation facilities and services, including transit alignments and general aviation airport facilities,to define existing capital facilities and travel levels as a basis for future planning This inventory must include state-owned transportation facilities within the city or county's jurisdictional boundaries; (B)Level of service standards for all locally owned arterials and transit routes to serve as a gauge to fudge performance of the system These standards should be regionally coordinated, (C)For state-owned transportation facilities, level of service standards for highways,as prescribed in chapters 47 06, and 47 80, RCW,to gauge the performance of the system The purposes of reflecting level of service standards for state highways in the local comprehensive plan are to monitor the performance of the system,to evaluate improvement strategies, and to facilitate coordination between the county's or city's six-year street, road,or transit program and the department of transportation's six-year investment program The concurrency requirements of (b)of this subsection do not apply to transportation facilities and services of statewide significance except for counties consisting of islands whose only connection to the mainland are state highways or ferry routes In these island counties,state highways and ferry route capacity must be a factor in meeting the concurrency requirements in(b)of this subsection, (D)Specific actions and requirements for bringing into compliance locally owned transportation facilities or services that are below an established level of service standard; (E)Forecasts of traffic for at least ten years based on the adopted land use plan to provide information on the location,timing, and capacity needs of future growth, (F)Identification of state and local system needs to meet current and future demands Identified needs on state- owned transportation facilities must be consistent with the statewide multimodal transportation plan required under chapter 47 06, RCW, (iv)Finance, including- (A)An analysis of funding capability to fudge needs against probable funding resources; (B)A multiyear financing plan based on the needs identified in the comprehensive plan,the appropriate parts of which shall serve as the basis for the six-year street, road, or transit program required by RCW 35 77 010 for cities, RCW 36 81 121 for counties, and RCW 35 58 2795 for public transportation systems The multiyear financing plan should be coordinated with the six-year improvement program developed by the department of transportation as required by**RCW 47 05 030, (C)If probable funding falls short of meeting identified needs,a discussion of how additional funding will be raised, or how land use assumptions will be reassessed to ensure that level of service standards will be met, (v)Intergovernmental coordination efforts, including an assessment of the impacts of the transportation plan and land use assumptions on the transportation systems of adjacent jurisdictions, (vi)Demand-management strategies, (vn)Pedestrian and bicycle component to include collaborative efforts to identify and designate planned improvements for pedestrian and bicycle facilities and corridors that address and encourage enhanced community access and promote healthy lifestyles (b)After adoption of the comprehensive plan by jurisdictions required to plan or who choose to plan under RCW 36 70A 040, local jurisdictions must adopt and enforce ordinances which prohibit development approval if the development causes the level of service on a locally owned transportation facility to decline below the standards adopted in the transportation element of the comprehensive plan, unless transportation improvements or strategies to accommodate the impacts of development are made concurrent with the development These strategies may include 1 increased public transportation service, ride sharing programs, demand management, and other transportation systems management strategies For the purposes of this subsection (6)"concurrent with the development"shall mean that improvements or strategies are in place at the time of development,or that a financial commitment is in place to complete the improvements or strategies within six years (c)The transportation element described in this subsection(6), and the six-year plans required by RCW 35 77 010 for cities, RCW 36 81 121 for counties, RCW 35 58 2795 for public transportation systems, and**RCW 47 05 030 for the state, must be consistent (7)An economic development element establishing local goals, policies, objectives,and provisions for economic growth and vitality and a high quality of life The element shall include (a)A summary of the local economy such as population, employment, payroll, sectors, businesses, sales, and other information as appropriate, (b)a summary of the strengths and weaknesses of the local economy defined as the commercial and industrial sectors and supporting factors such as land use,transportation, utilities, education,work force, housing, and natural/cultural resources, and (c)an identification of policies, programs, and projects to foster economic growth and development and to address future needs A city that has chosen to be a residential community is exempt from the economic development element requirement of this subsection (8)A park and recreation element that implements, and is consistent with,the capital facilities plan element as it relates to park and recreation facilities The element shall include (a)Estimates of park and recreation demand for at least a ten-year period, (b)an evaluation of facilities and service needs, and (c)an evaluation of intergovernmental coordination opportunities to provide regional approaches for meeting park and recreational demand (9) It is the intent that new or amended elements required after January 1,2002, be adopted concurrent with the scheduled update provided in RCW 36 70A 130 Requirements to incorporate any such new or amended elements shall be null and void until funds sufficient to cover applicable local government costs are appropriated and distributed by the state at least two years before local government must update comprehensive plans as required in RCW 36 70A 130 12005 c 360§2,(2005 c 477§1 expired August 31,2005),2004 c 196§1,2003 c 152§1 Prior 2002 c 212§2,2002 c 154§2,1998 c 171 §2, 1997 c 429§7, 1996 c 239§1,prior 1995 c 400§3, 1995 c 377§1, 1990 1 st ex s c 17§7] NOTES: Reviser's note: *(1)RCW 36 70A 030 was amended by 2005 c 423§2,changing subsection (14)to subsection (15) **(2)RCW 47 05 030 was amended by 2005 c 319§9, changing the six-year improvement program to a ten-year improvement program. Expiration date--2005 c 477§1:"Section 1 of this act expires August 31,2005"[2005 c 477§3] Effective date—2005 c 477: "This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health,or safety,or support of the state government and its existing public institutions,and takes effect immediately [May 13, 2005]"[2005 c 477§2] Findings—Intent—2005 c 360:"The legislature finds that regular physical activity is essential to maintaining good health and reducing the rates of chronic disease The legislature further finds that providing opportunities for walking, biking, horseback riding,and other regular forms of exercise is best accomplished through collaboration between the private sector and local,state, and institutional policymakers This collaboration can build communities where people find it easy and safe to be physically active It is the intent of the legislature to promote policy and planning efforts that increase access to inexpensive or free opportunities for regular exercise in all communities around the state"(2005 c 360§ 1 ] I Prospective application-- 1997 c 429§§ 1-21. See note following RCW 36 70A 3201 Severability—1997 c 429: See note following RCW 36 70A 3201 Construction—Application-- 1995 c 400:"A comprehensive plan adopted or amended before May 16, 1995, shall be considered to be in compliance with RCW 36 70A 070 or 36 70A 110, as in effect before their amendment by this act, if the comprehensive plan is in compliance with RCW 36 70A 070 and 36 70A 110 as amended by this act This section shall not be construed to alter the relationship between a county-wide planning policy and comprehensive plans as specified under RCW 36 70A 210 As to any appeal relating to compliance with RCW 36 70A 070 or 36 70A 110 pending before a growth management hearings board on May 16, 1995,the board may take up to an additional ninety days to resolve such appeal By mutual agreement of all parties to the appeal,this additional ninety-day period may be extended "[1995 c 400§4] I Effective date— 1995 c 400: See note following RCW 36 70A 040 S IPermitlPlanlCompPlanAmdments120051CIP 120605_OpsCommittee_RCW36 70A 070 doc Kent City Council Meeting Date December 13, 2005 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND REVISIONS TO KENT CITY CODE 12 13, SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPITAL FACILITIES PLANS ORDINANCES —ADOPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No. relating to CPA-2005-11 which amends the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive plan to include the amended Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts, and adoption of Ordinance No. relating to CPA-2005-12, which amends the school impact fee schedule contained in section 12.13.160 of the Kent City Code to reflect changes in the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts' Capital Facilities Plans. 3. EXHIBITS: Ordinances and their exhibits referenced therein 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee and Staff (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? X Revenue? X Currently in the Budget? Yes X No If no: Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund Amount $ 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6F ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending Section 12.13.160 of the Kent City Code to amend the school impact fee schedule (CPA-2005-1). RECITALS A. The City of Kent adopted a school impact fee program as authorized by the Growth Management Act and RCW 82.02.050. B. Chapter 12.13.070 of the Kent City Code requires that the Capital Facilities Plans of the school districts be submitted to the City of Kent on an annual basis for City Council review, and that such review shall occur in conjunction with any update of the Capital Facilities Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. C. The Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts have requested amendments to the text of the Comprehensive Plan to reflect proposed changes to impact fees. D. On September 30, 2005, the City provided the required sixty (60) day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 to the state of Washington of the City's proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan and the sixty (60) day notice period has lapsed. E. After a public hearing before the City Council on November 15, 2005, the City Council on December 13, 2005, approved Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-2005-1 to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts, which include changes in proposed impact fees as follows: Federal 1 School Impact Fee -2005 Way School District increase to$3,393.00 for single-family and decrease to$895.00 for multifamily units; Kent School District increase to $4,775.00 for single-family and increase to$2,940 for multifamily; and Auburn School District increase to$5,681.36 for single-family and decrease to $1,536.30 for multifamily. F. It is necessary to amend section 12.13.160 of the Kent City Code to reflect the Comprehensive Plan amendment that established a new base fee schedule for the Federal Way School District of $3,393.00 for single-family and $895.00 for multifamily units; for the Kent School District of $4,775.00 for single-family and $2,940.00 for multifamily; and for the Auburn School District of $5,681.36 for single- family and $1,536.30 for multifamily; NOW THEREFORE, NOW THEREFORE,THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE SEMONI. —Amendment. Section 12.13.160 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 12.13.160. Base fee schedule. The following fee shall be assessed for the indicated types of development: School District Single Family M����ultii-��f��am��((ii'ly Multi-family studio Kent, No. 415 $1,056.99 $, 62..90 $ 0.00 $4,775.00 $2,940.00 Federal Way, No. 210 $ 868 09 $-905.00 $ 0.00 $3,393.00 $895.00 Auburn, No. 408 $5,2 $4,831.85 $ 0.00 $5,681.36 $1,536.30 SECTION 2. — Severabi/ify If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same 2 Schoo/Impact Fee -2005 shall remain in full force and effect. SEC7ION3. —5avin4s. The existing section 12.13.160 of the Kent City Code, which is repealed and replaced by this ordinance, shall remain in full force and effect until the effective date of this ordinance. SEC7ION4. -Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED: day of December, 2005. APPROVED: day of December, 2005. PUBLISHED: day of December, 2005. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. , passed by the City Council of the City of Kent,Washington,and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P%Gvfl\0RDINANCENSchW1mpac[-2005 doc 3 School Impact Fee - 2005 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan to amend the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts (CPA-2005-1). RECITALS A. The Washington State Growth Management Act("GMA")requires internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements and the plans from other jurisdictions. B. To assure that comprehensive plans remain relevant and up to date,the GMA allows amendments to the capital facilities element of comprehensive plans concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a city budget(RCW 36.70A.130(2)(111)). C. The City of Kent has established procedures for amending the Comprehensive Plan in chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code,allowing amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the City budget and allowing the City Council to hold the public hearing instead of the Land Use and Planning Board. D. The Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts have submitted proposed amendments to their Capital Facilities Plans to be included in an amendment of the City's Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. E. After providing appropriate public notice, the City Council of the City of Kent considered the requested comprehensive plan amendment and conducted a public hearing on the same on November 15, 2005. 1 Comprehensive Plan Amendments School Districts'Capital Facilities Plans F. 4_ Qn Septernber_ �,,2Q05, the City provided the required sixty (60) day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 to the state of Washington of the City's proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan and the sixty (60) day notice period has lapsed. G. On December 13, 2005, the City Council for the City of Kent approved the Capital Facilities Element amendment CPA-2005-1 to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached and incorporated by this reference (CPA-2005-1); NOW, THEREFORE, NOW THEREFORE,THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE SECTION 1. - Amendment. The Capital Facilities Element of the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the t Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit"A"attached and incorporated by this reference (CPA-2005-1). SECTION 2, - Severability If any one or more sections, sub-sections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION3, - Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after the date of passage as provided by law. JIM WHITE, MAYOR 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendments School Districts'Capital Facilities Plans 1 ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED day of December, 2005. APPROVED day of December, 2005. PUBLISHED day of December, 2005. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. , passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P\Civil\ORDINANCE\CompPlanAmend-SchoolDistncts'CapitalFacHioesPlans2005 doc 3 Comprehensive Plan Amendments School Districts'Capital Facilities Plans EXHIBIT "A" 10 KENT SCHOOL August 8, 2005 ��,C; DISTRICT ' City of Kent Planning Services Department Charlene Anderson, AICP, Manager 220 4th Avenue South Kent, WA 98032-5895 Dear Ms. Arson: Enclosed per your request are 12 copies of the Final 2005 update of the Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan adopted by the Kent School District Board of Directors on July 27, 2005 Following review by King County School Technical Review Committee, there were only minor technical changes made to the Finance Plan on Page 24 of the Draft Plan which was submitted to you on May 6, 2005. If you have any questions, please call me at (253) 373-7293. Sincerely, :Z- -44�74� Gwenn Escher-Derdowski Planning Administrator GE:ds Enclosures c: Fred Satterstrom, Director of Community Development Glona Gould-Wessen, AICP, GIS Coordinator/Planner Bill Osborne, Planning Services Department Grace T. Yuan & Denise Stiffarm, Counsel for King County School Coalition i kush?ess Services 12033 SE 256th Street Suite A-600 Kent,Washington 98030.6643 Ph 253-373.7295 Fax 253-373-7018 1 JJJITAi IACIiINS IRI 2005 — 2006 - 2010 - 2011 BIT SeNOOL BISTRICT No. OL Fmmld ParkElernenrary Site Emerald Park Elementary School Emerald Park Elementary I Serving Unincorporated King County and Kent, Covington, Aud um, Mapfe Valfey, Black Diamond, Renton, Sea7ac, Washington Apd(2005 01 School 12033 SE 256'Street Kent, Washington 98030-6643 (253)373-7295 SIX - YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2005 - 2006 — 2010 - 2011 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD of DIRECTORS Bill Boyce Sandra Collins Scott Floyd Lisa Holliday Mike Jensen ADMINISTRATION Barbara Grohe, Ph.D. — Superintendent Fred H. High —Assistant Superintendent for Business Services Mark Haddock, Ph.D. —Assistant Superintendent for beaming & School Improvement Margaret A. Whitney—Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources Janis Bechtel— Executive Director, Kentwood Strand Donald Hall— Executive Director of Information Technology John Knutson — Executive Director of Finance Joseph McBrayer, Ph.D. — Executive Director, Kentlake Strand Gary Plano, Ed.D. — Executive Director, Kent-Meridian Strand Merri Rieger—Executive Director, Kentridge Strand Kent School D*tnct Six-Year Capital Facilities Pian Apnl 2005 i t i KENT SCHOOL Kent school Owlstrid Al DISTRICT I SIX - YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN I 2005 - 2006 2010 - 2011 April 2005 1 For information on the Plan, please call the Finance & Planning Department at (253) 373-7295 Capital Facilities Plan Contributing Staff Gwenn Escher-Derdowski Forecast& Planning Administrator Lary Price, Director of Facilities& Construction Karia Wilkerson & Lynell Mooney, Facilities Department Don Walkup&Helen Shindell-Butler, Transportation Department Cover Design by Debbi Smith Maps by Jana Tucker Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Kent school Ow r A Sk Tear Capital Facilities Plan ladle of Contents Section Page Number I Executive Summary 2 I I Six-Year Enrollment Projection 4 , III District Standard of Service 8 I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools 11 V Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan 14 V I Relocatable Classrooms 17 V I I Projected Classroom Capacity 18 V I I I Finance Plan, Cost Basis and Impact Fee Schedules 23 I X Summary of Changes to Previous Plan 30 X Appendixes 31 Kent School DistrIct Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 I Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Kent School District (the "District") as the organization's facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, Maple Valley and Black Diamond. This annual plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2005 for the 2004-2005 school year. I This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. The first ordinance implementing impact fees for the unincorporated areas was effective September 15, 1993. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a j fee-implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the ■ incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Plan has also been submitted to cities of Maple Valley, Black Diamond, SeaTac, and Renton. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a "standard of service" in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Program capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Relocatables in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (continued) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 2 i j I Executive Summary (continued) - The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District standard of service and the existing inventory, which includes some relocatable classrooms. The District's program capacity of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the reduction of class size to meet the requirements of Student Achievement Initiative 728. Reiocatables provide additional transitional capacity until permanent facilities are completed. Kent School District is the fourth largest district in the state. Enrollment is reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) on Form P223. Enrollment on October 1 is considered to be the enrollment for the year. P223 Headcount for October 1, 2004 was 26,891. P223 FTE (Full Time Equivalent) enrollment was 25,770.44. (FTE reports Kindergarten at .5 and excludes Early Childhood Education [ECE] and college-only Running Start students.) The actual number of individual students per the October 2004, full head count was 27,340. (Full Headcount reports all students at 1.0 including Kindergarten, ECE and college-only Running Start students.) The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of , transitional facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. Our plan is to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of relocatables. A financing plan is included in Section V I I I which demonstrates the District's ability to implement this Plan. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated annually with changes in the fee schedules adjusted accordingly. 1 Kent School District six-Year capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 3 I I I Six -Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, growth projections are basted on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years. (see Table 2) The student generation factor, as defined on the next page, is the basis for the growth projections from new developments. I King County births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system. (See Table 1) 8.34% of 22,487 King County live births in 2000 is forecast for 1,876 students expected j in Kindergarten for October 1, 2005. Together with proportional growth from new construction, 8.34% of King County births is equivalent to the number of students projected to enter kindergarten in the district for the next six-year period.(sea Tanta 2) Early Childhood Education students (sometimes identified as "Preschool Special Education [SE] or handicapped students") and non-disabled peer models are forecast and reported separately. Capacity is reserved to serve that program at seven elementary schools. Full day kindergarten programs are provided at most elementary schools with alternative funding for the second half of the day . The first grade population is traditionally 7 - 8% larger than the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District from private kindergartens. Cohort survival method uses historical enrollment data to forecast the number of students projected for the following year. Near term projections assume some growth from new developments to be offset by current local economic conditions. With notable exceptions, the expectation is that enrollment increases will occur District-wide in the long term. District projections are based on historical growth patterns combined with continuing development of projects in the pipeline dependent on market/growth conditions. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools and monitor conditions to reflect adjustments in this assumption. The six-year enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions may be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. jWithin practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The Kent School District serves seven permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, and Auburn and a small portion of the city of Maple Valley. The west Lake Sawyer area of Kent School District is in the city limits of Black Diamond and Kent Mountain View Academy is located in the small portion of the City of SeaTac served by Kent School District. (Continued) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 4 11 Six -Year Enrollment Projection (Cononued) STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a , school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last five years. The Student Factor has been updated to reflect the secondary grade level reconfiguration. Following these guidelines, the student generation factor for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary .482 Middle School .161 Senior High .284 Total .927 Multi-Family Elementary .293 Middle School .069 Senior High .114 Total .476 The student generation factor is based on a survey of 4,219 single family dwelling units and 2,701 multi-family dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy rates. Please refer to Appendix E on Pages 35-36 for details of the Student Generation Factor survey. The actual number of students in those residential developments was determined using the District's Education Logistics (EDULOG) Transportation System. In 4,219 single family dwelling units there were 2,035 elementary students, 679 middle school students, and 1,197 senior high students for a total of 3,911 students. In 2,701 multi-family dwelling units, there were 791 elementary students, 186 middle school students, and 308 senior high students, for a total of 1,285 students. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 5 co O A CD m N l+l �- In A <O a r � � N O O Cl) I* N O N O mLo OI O O r r N N A r 0 A W)^ In CD N N W r N N N N N N N N r r N N to CS1 ^ 1� N ~ £ O CO W co � O O N N PO9 M N P VV N `> Ln m N O r r r N N N N N N N r r N m J • �y �p �p C N co cV e0 1LB s a 1 i R re -a M RN 1L. .- M c o��Qp? A OI Ol O O ^ r [7 O O Co M N e_ m to m N r Cd O r r N N N N N N N N r r N �D E J N 3 m r A O A O f0 O r etl N N co N ^ @c a N co '-t W r N N N N N N N N N r N m O r O7 c Cpp1 pf �ppp ppp p sr Q N O O O O N O N O N O cd N mn p i0 K (V N CO N N N N1 N N N N N C4 r N fo �C r O ��p N Q0 0 , N N M C7 LO O O a6 r.- C� E7 a TOg c O in O) O r N O ^ O O r A In CD r N N N N N N N N N ^ r N ^ Iff a $ ep O J Ifs pCO Ln j % Ire dap In S w c `n tMy o N m w C4 l r g o f4 NN O O N a •- a O a 01 O) � CD � � � `� � W O Z m r N pp N N N N N N N �" e` r N If1 Q y J rn W er� C32 aR N OOa Nc� N � A D co C.) O O� O f1[Oj Nn e U r O O (D O OW 0) Of W N U) A O N N N N N N N r r r r r N O O W 04 Z $ to Q N tCpp COD N N N W) p^p �Cpp N m =p T W & W OAi O O� 01 Of aD O1 a0 <O V to U m N N " N r r r r e- r r r N C b J G r[ J W Q5� to R O 25 In r W N Y In W b O y M m r CV) 04 rn rn o= W N IRR NVJ CO) .� toS f" N Obito N mI N c T) C CO c0 >Q) N s N Of N Ym r N r r r r r r r r r r r r N V)0: M W a� 0 � M 0) c 'm o p N o rn rn rn W a A A (00 h A E U c m r N N N r r r r r N M C $ w 0 T M Gor pp � �^ N 4m In e- CO N amp t�D p p�j NY c O Im CDOI co Ql Of CO CO f: t0 [D •t N `• g m r N N r r r r r r r e- r r• r N cl (�p W C �' 3E In It co In In m O Co N O O 0 ` m 5 c �. „e 0) �' CO CO Of COO. n h cN0_ m 7 V N �? ,�-_ $ r LL r IM r r r r r r r r ez r N ^ cl U °a to c w C N N [7 N N W V N e'f pCpp pp N O Ly w chi qtq co co O O A N O O N N cc c0 c0 O M to CD C m 11 V C CD cc CD " O F A CD CD VF V_ c? N r Q� W ez r N _ � J C) cc m H � 3 w a $ w m m In U. L` m r N M it N CO N coOf O r N C C C E c� r r r c W C) c = W C0 LA ID m m m m m m m m m m (D tD w m Y bb D 'O D 't7 'C U D 'O 9 V 9 W N M a c D W 12 3 m E 1~i H a c (D U' U' C7 (7 U' UI a KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 SIX-YEAR F.T.E. ENROLLMENT PROJECTION N 0 ctoberl 2004 1 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 King County Live Births 22,007 22,487 21,778 21,863 22,431 22,500 22,600 ' Increase/Decrease -188 480 -709 85 568 69 100 Kindergarten/Birth % 2 8.34% 8.34% 8.34°% 8 34% 8.34% 8.34% 6 34% Z"Kindergarten FTE C .5 918 938 918 922 945 948 952 Grade 1 1,954 1,986 2,060 2,017 2.025 2,076 2,082 Grade 2 1,935 2,023 2,085 2,163 2,118 2,126 2,179 Grade 3 2,020 1,969 2,090 2,153 2,234 2,187 2,196 Grade 4 2,057 2,084 2,062 2,188 2,253 2,338 2,289 Grade 5 2,102 2,067 2,123 2,101 2,229 2,295 2,381 Grade 6 2,139 2,155 2,149 2,207 2,185 2,317 2,385 Grade 7 2,243 2.176 2,202 2,196 2,255 2,232 2,366 , Grade 8 2,221 2,255 2,197 2,223 2,217 2,276 2,253 Grade 95 2,705 2,542 2,606 2,539 2,569 2,562 2,630 Grade 10 2,124 2,475 2,349 2,408 2,346 2,373 2,367 Grade 11 1,907 1,822 2,148 2,040 2,091 2,037 2,060 Grade 12 1,446 1,543 1,484 1,748 1,660 1,702 1,658 Total FTE Enrollment 25,771 26,035 26,473 26,905 27,127 27.469 27,798 NOW 2r3r4 Yearly Increase 413 264 438 432 222 342 329 Yearly Increase% 1.60% 1.02% 1.68% 1.63% 0.83% 1.26% 1.20% Cumulative Increase 413 677 1,115 1,547 1,769 2,111 2,"0 Full Time E ivalent FTE 25,771 1 26,035 26,473 26,905 27,127 1 27,469 1 27,798 ' Kindergarten protection based on King County actual live birth percentage and proportional growth from new construction 2 Kindergarten FTE enrollment projection at.5 Is calculated by using the District's percentage of King County live births. 5 years earlier compared to actual kindergarten enrollment in the previous year (Excludes ECE-Early Childhood Education) 3 Kindergarten protection Is at.5 FTE although most schools provide Full Day Kindergarten with alternative funding. 4 Oct 2004 P223 FTE is 25,771 &Headcount Is 26.891.Full student count with ECE Preschool&Running Start=27,340. 5 Grade level reconfiguration In 2004,all 9th grade students were served at the senior high schools. G R O W T H P R O J E C T I O N S - Adjustments for current economic factors `For facilities planning purposes, this six-year enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 April 2005 Page 7 Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" � In order to determine the capacity of the District's facilities, King County Code 21A.06 refers to a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the District which would, in the District's judgment, best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as "impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower class size at those facilities. Relocatables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (See Appendix A, a& C) The standard of service defined herein may continue to change in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service adjustments to meet the requirements of Student Achievement Initiative 728. This process will affect various aspects of the District's "standard of service" and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Because the funding for Initiative 728 is incremental, implementation of the Initiative is also incremental and may result in annual changes to school capacity. Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students Class size for grades K - 3 should not exceed an average of 22 students. Class size for grade 4 should not exceed an average of 23 students. Class size for grades 5 - 6 should not exceed an average of 29 students. Program capacity for regular education elementary classrooms is calculated at an average of 24 students per classroom because of fluctuations between primary and intermediate grade levels (i.e. third/fourth or fourth/fifth grade split classes, etc.). Most elementary schools provide full day kindergarten programs (FDK or KAI — Full Day Kindergarten or Kindergarten Academic Intervention)with the second half of the day funded by grants or tuition. Students have scheduled time in a computer lab. Students may also be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (continued) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 8 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs such as those designated as follows: English Language Learners (E L L) Self-contained Special Education Support Center Programs (SC) Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Early Childhood Education (ECE) (3-4 yr. old students with disabilities) School Adjustment(sAl Program for severely behavior-disordered students Speech & Language Therapy & Programs for Hearing Impaired students Mild, Moderate and Severe Developmental Disabilities (DD) Occupational & Physical Therapy Programs (OT/PT) Developmental Kindergarten (Magnet K Programs) Kindergarten Academic Intervention Program (KAI-Full Day Kindergarten) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) District Remediation Programs Education for Highly Capable Students (formerly "Gifted" Program) Some of the above special programs require specialized classroom space, as well as music and physical education classrooms, computer labs, etc.; thus, the permanent capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in these special programs and "pull-out" space must be allocated to serve these programs. Some newer buildings have been constructed to accommodate most of these programs; some older buildings have been modified, and in some circumstances, these modifications reduce the classroom capacity of the buildings. When programs change, program capacity fluctuates and is updated annually to reflect the change in program and capacity. Current Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings. Reductions have been made in 7th and 10th grade English classes for Initiative 728. These standards are subject to change pending annual updates based on staff and public review for changes funded by Student Achievement Initiative 728. Class size for grades 7 - 9 should not exceed an average of 29 students. Class size for 7th & 1 Oth grade English class should not exceed an average of 25 students. Class size for grades 10 - 12 should not exceed an average of 31 students. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (conrd Kent School District Six-year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 9 Current Kent School District "Standard-of Service" (continued) Identified students will also be provided other education opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows: Computer, Multi-media & Technology Labs and Programs English Language Learners (E L L) Science Programs & Labs — Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Oceanography, Astronomy, Meteorology, Marine Biology, General Science, etc. Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Basic Skills Programs Preschool and Daycare Programs Music Programs—Band, Orchestra, Chorus, Jazz Band, etc. Art Programs—Painting, Design, Drawing, Ceramics, Pottery, Photography, etc. Theater Arts— Drama, Stage Tech, etc. Journalism and Yearbook Classes ' Highly Capable (Honors or Gifted) and Advanced Placement Programs International Baccalaureate Program Traffic Safety Education JROTC -Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps Variety of Career&Technical Education Programs (CTE-Vocational Education) Family & Consumer Science—Cooking, Sewing, Child Development, etc. Health Sciences, Sports Medicine, etc. Business Education— Keyboarding, Accounting, Business Law, DECA, Sales & Marketing, etc. Material Sciences — Woods and Cabinet Making, Metals, Welding, Electronics, Auto Shop, Manufacturing Technology, Machine Shop, CAD, (Computer-aided Design) Drafting & Drawing, etc. Culinary Arts, Graphic& Commercial Arts, Engineering, etc. Many of these programs and others require specialized classroom space which can reduce the permanent capacity of the school buildings. In addition, an altemative home school assistance, choice and transition program is provided for students in grades K - 12 at Kent Mountain View Academy. Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 85% for secondary schools. Program capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level with adjustments for pull-out programs served in relocatables. In the future, the District will continue close analysis of actual utilization. Kent School Oishlct Six-Year capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 10 t I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools ' Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 26,978 students and transitional (relocatable) capacity to house 1,843. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section I I L Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity. (See Table 3 on Page 12) The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs, additional classrooms and new schools. Program capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes at elementary schools and Kentlake High School. It has also been updated to estimate new capacity for building additions at the other three high schools. It excludes capacity for the temporary closure of Kent Junior High which will re-open as Mill Creek Middle School in the fall of 2005. Program capacity also reflects adjustments for the Student Achievement Initiative 728 reduction in class size. The class size reduction received voter approval in the Educational Programs and Operations Levy as well as through funding for Student Achievement Initiative 728. The District will conduct annual public review and update class size recommendations in accordance with the requirements and incremental funding of Student Achievement Initiative 728. Kent Mountain View Academy (formerly Kent Leaming Center) serves grades Kindergarten through 12 with transition, choice and home school assistance programs. It is located in the former Grandview School in the western part of the , District in the city of SeaTac. This school was originally designed as an elementary school and is included in the elementary capacity for this Plan. Calculation of Elementary, Junior High and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B and C. A map of existing schools is included on Page 13. Kent Sdml District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April W05 Page 11 _ KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS 2004-2005 ' SCHOOL Opened ABR ADDRESS _ y Program Carriage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235-140t h Avenue SE, Renton 9W58 490 Ceder Valley Elementary 1971 CV 285M Timbedane Way SE, Covington 98042 416 Covington Elementary 1961 CO 17070 SE Wax Road, Covington 98042 478 Cteshvood Elementary 1980 CW 25225-18M Avenue SE, Covington 98042 480 Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98031 466 East HIN Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 490 ' Emerald Park 1999 EP 118W SE 216th Street, Kent 9W31 504 Fairwood Elementary 1969 FW 1WW-148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 408 Glanridge Elementary 1996 GR 19406-120h Avenue SE,Renton 98058 456 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700-1gist Place SE, Kent 98042 490 ' Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27041-144th Avenue SE, Kam 98042 480 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915-186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 428 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700-64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 466 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19060-142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 562 Marlon Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street Kent 98031 465 Meadow RkVo Elementary 1994 MR 27710-108th Avenue SE,Kent 98031 456 Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621-140h Avenue SE, Kent 98042 538 ' Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street Kent 98031 492 Neey-0 n Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 230th Street Kam 9WU 442 Panther Lake Elementary 1938 PL 20831-108th Avenue SE, Kant 98031 364 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street Kent 98031 498 Pee Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825-118h Avenue SE, Kent 98031 540 Rklgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030-162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 504 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135-228th Avenue SE,Kent 96042 504 Scenic HNI Elementary 1960 SH 2W25 Woodland Way South, Kent 98031 478 Soos Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 216h Place. Kant 98031 418 Sprmgbrook Elementary 1969 SB 20035-10(ih Avenue SE, Kent 98031 440 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300-132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 504 ' Elementary TOTAL 13,290 Ceder Heights Middle School 1993 CH 19M SE 272 Street,Covington 98042 949 Kent Junior High(Closed for 1 Year) 1952 KJ 620 North Central Avenue, Kent WW2 -0- Mattson Middle School 1981 MA 16400 SE 251st Street Covington 98l)42 808 Meeker Middle School 1970 MK 12WO SE 192nd Street Renton 98058 890 Meridian Middle School 1958 MJ 23480-120h Avenue SE, Kent NMI 747 t Northwood Middle School 1996 NW 17007 SE 184th Street Renton 98058 944 Sequoia Middle School 1966 SJ 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98031 830 Middle School TOTAL 5,188 ' Kent-Meridian Senor High School 1951 III 10020 SE 256th Street Kant 9W31 1=1 Kentlake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 SE 300h Street Kent 98042 1.812 Kentndge Senior High School 19" KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 90031 2.302 Kentwood Senior High School 1981 KW 25WO-164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 2,187 Senior High TOTAL 8,104 Kent Mountain View Academy 2 1965 LC 22420 Military Road, Des Moines 98198 416 DISTRICT TOTAL 26 978 Changes to capacity reflect program changes and new building additions at high schools 3 Kent Mountain View Academy serves grades K-12 The school was formerly known as Kent Leammg Center&Grandview Elementary. ' Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 April 2005 Page 12 "*P 1 mp • qqcr C t ; �.. E0p � E -�, C c c la �►> D m Sea m rA 4G. J EL o o Vvv • a Y £ ,Li 3S e^d 4W91 m 3S end 410Vt • {yy U 3S ary PUN l 3S ewd PuZ6l Q • e o 3 oil HI Off z z 1k pp • • • 2L2, C 3S GAV 4WOL 0 c G • • • C } 8 N r� qq 22 • S4f !y eVV P4ue7 Z� A[vn4 IH Aep°A iS9M a3• N a0 m Ke�� ¢ ,• 9 elDRiewl Kent School DlsNict Six-Yew Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Pape 13 ' ' V Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan ' At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring of 2005-,-the following projects are completed or in the planning phase in the District: • The Board authorized grade level reconfiguration to move 9"'grade students to high schools and serve 7"'and 8"'grade students at middle schools.Additions to three high schools have added capacity for additional students from new development and 9"'Grade students moving to the high schools. • Reconfiguration to 7"' and 8"'grades provides additional capacity at middle schools effective in September 2004 i • The Board approved temporary closure of Kent Junior High for re-purpose and remodel. In 2004-05,students from KJH are attending other middle schools since all 9"'grade ' students moved to the high schools. Kent Junior High is expected to re-open as Mill Creek Middle School (#7a)with a 7"'Grade Technology Academy in September 2005. • Enrollment trends continue to show an increase in enrollment. Projections reflect future ' need for additional capacity at the elementary and high school level. Facility needs are reflected in this Plan pending preliminary review. ' • Sites for potential future schools and facilities are listed in Table 4 and shown on the site map on page 17. • Some funding Is secured for purchase of additional portables and some funding may be provided by impact fees as needed. Sites are based on need for additional capacity. County and city planners and decision-makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety, as well as pull- outs and tum-arounds for school buses ' Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future, flee raae 4) The voter approved bond issue for $105.4 million in 1990 and $130 million in 1994 included funding for the purchase of eleven sites for some of these and future schools, ' and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is secured for purchase of additional sites but some may be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements and some ' property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. 2002 voter approval of $69.5 million bond issue for capital improvement included the construction funding for additions to three high schools and some impact fees have also been applied to those projects. Student Achievement Initiative 728 funds are being utilized to reduce class size and provide extended learning opportunities. Based on community input at public hearings, the Board will continue annual review of standard of ' service and those decisions will be reflected in the each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. Kent School District Six-Year capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 14 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity Projected Projected %for SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE LOCATION T e Status Completion Program new , Data Capad Growth Amm irate I Agxo&rrte ' ELEMENTARY I (Numbers assigned to future schools may not correlate with number of existing schools.) Elementary#31 (Unfunded) To be determined Y New Planning 2009 500 75% MIDDLE SCHOOL Grade Level Reconliguredon has Moved 9th grade to High School Program Plarvihtg 2004 WA WA ' provided additional capacity at Middle Schools SENIOR HIGH -1 1 Classroom additions at three Kent-Meridian Additions consinzam 2004 386 75% high schools and recarl8gunrdon Kentridge Additions cmoiruaion 2004 1.000 75% ' moved 9th Grade to high school Kentwood Additions cwdi uom 2004 896 75% Senior High#5 (Unfunded) ' To be determined Z New Planning 2010 1,000 75% ' Addtional TEMPORARY FACILITIES I Capacity Relocatables For placement as needed New Planning 2004+ ys_3s esa, 100% ' SUPPORT FACILITIES I ' Bus Facility (Unfunded)' Near Kent-Meridian High School New Planning TBD 2 N/A #on Land Use ' Map 3 OTHER SITES ACQUIRED T JuAsdirfiori 4 Covington area (Near Mattson JH) SE 251 &164 SE, Covington 98042 Elementary City of Covington 7 Covington area South(Scersella) SE 290&156 SE, Kent 98042 Elementary King County ' 5 Covington area West(Halieson-Wikstrom) 15435 SE 256 Street, Covington 98042 TBD 2 City of Covington 3 Ham Lake area (Pollard) 16820 SE 240. Kent 98042 Elementary King County ' 8 SE of Lake Morton area(West) SE 332&204 SE, Kent 98042 Secondary King County 2 Shady Lake area (Sowers,etc.) 17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98058 Elementary King County , 1 So.King Co Activity Center(Nike site) SE 167&170 SE, Renton 98058 TBD x King County 12 South Central site(Plemmons-Yeh-Wms) SE 286th Street&124th Ave SE,Kent TBD a King County Notes: ' Unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future. ' Y TBD-To be determined-Some sites are acquired but placement, timing and/or configuration have not been determined. 3 Numbers correspond to sites on Map on Page 16 Other site locations are parcels identified in Table 7 on Page 26 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 April 2005 Page 15 , 0 V _ - --- 0MOMME C • H v tm 0 S? Ow �� mC ' U 1 0 . e • V. 3S W 41V9L m F P W 4y0Vd � 3S � • :� I 3S W PUZEI � W � 3S igh �W+ZEL mb ' $ • •il ffi o ' 3S GAV 4400 L •o�' ` J~ ` • «�� { 6AnTV 4WOl N W S�1 •G U �f � Sl W 104USO ,'�� 401H AeIIDA isaA1 • b� ' Nbto- QE , N ZG W o� _ A0 S eyDys�eyul Kent School District Six-Yew Capital Facllld"Plan Apr112005 Page 16 1 V I Relocatable Classrooms ' For the purpose of clarification, the term "portables" and the more descriptively _ `^ accurate term, "relocatables" are used interchangeably in this Plan. The Plan also references use of portables or relocatables as interim or transitional ' capacity/facilities. Currently, the District utilizes 132 total relocatables to house students in excess ' of permanent capacity, for program purposes at school locations, and six for other purposes. (See Appendices A S C D) Based on enrollment projections, program capacity and funded permanent ' facilities, the District anticipates the need to purchase some additional relocatables during the next six-year period. The continually escalating cost of ' moving relocatables will increasingly limit the choice between building new relocatables on site and relocating older ones. , During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District's relocatables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During , the useful life of some of the relocatables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these relocatables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. ' Portables, or relocatables, may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school t facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased , capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Relocatables currently in use will be evaluated resulting in some being improved ' and some replaced. Quality concerns will be among those addressed by the next Community Facilities Planning Committee for review of capital facilities ' needs for the next bond issue. The Plan projects that the District will use relocatables to accommodate interim , housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of relocatables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between relocatables, emerging technologies and educational , restructuring will continue to be be examined. Kent School District Six-Year Capital FaclUbw Plan April 2005 Page 17 V I I Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section I V, the program capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size fluctuations in Grades K - 4. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3 on Page 12, the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts. (see Tables 5 6 5 A-&Con papas 19-22) ' Enrollment is reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is set by OSPI as the "enrollment count date" for the year. ' Full Time Equivalent (FTE) student enrollment for October 1, 2004 was 25,770.44 which represents an increase of 413 FTE over the previous year. Kindergarten students are counted at .5 and P223 FTE excludes Early Childhood Education students (ECE - preschool special education) and College-only Running Start students. (see Tables 5&5A-e-C on pages 19-22) On October 1, there were 535 students in 11 th and 12'h grade participating in the Running Start program at 9 different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. 261 of these students attended classes only at the college ("college-only") and are thus excluded from the FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District continues to be the fourth largest district in the state of Washington. P223 Headcount for October 1, 2004 was 26,891 with kindergarten ' students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECE and college-only Running Start students. A full headcount of all students enrolled on October 1, 2004 totals 27,340 which includes ECE and college-only Running Start students. This ' reflects an increase of 470 actual students compared to October 1, 2003. Based on the enrollment forecasts, current inventory and capacity, current ' standard of service, relocatable capacity, and future planned additional classroom space, the District anticipates having sufficient capacity to house students over the next six years. (See Table 5 and Tables 5 A-&C on Pages 19-22) ' This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There may be significant need for additional portables and/or new schools to ' accommodate growth within the District and class size reduction mandated under Student Achievement Initiative 728. Some schools, by design, may be opened with relocatables on site. Boundary changes, limited movement of relocatables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and underutilization of facilities in different parts of the District. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 18 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 ' PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ' - TOTAL DISTRICT 3 ' SCHOOL YEAR 2004-2005 2oa5loos zoos-2007 2007-2ooe 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 Actual P R O J E C T E D , Permanent Program Capacity' 25,512 26,978 27,778 27,778 27,778 27,778 28,278 ' New Permanent Constriction 1 Estimated Program Capacity , 4 Kent Junior High dosed 1 year for remodel&re-purposing in 2004-05-Will reopen as Mill Creek Middle School 7a in Fall 2005 -816 800 , Additions to 3 Senior High schools 2,282 Elementary#31 (Unfunded)5 500 , Senior High#5 (Unfunded) 5 1,000 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 26,978 27,778 27,778 27,778 27,778 28,278 29.278 Interim Relocatable Capacity , Elementary Relocatable capacity Required 0 0 0 48 288 96 264 Middle School Rekroawe Capacity Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , Senior High Relocetade Capacity Required 93 279 496 651 589 589 0 Totsl Relocatable Capacity Required 1&s 93 279 496 699 877 685 264 , TOTAL CAPACITY 1 27,071 1 28,057 28,274 1 28,477 1 28,655 1 28,963 1 29,542 , 2 & 3 TOTAL FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 25,771 26,035 26,473 26,905 27,127 27,469 27,798 ' UISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 1,300 2,022 1,801 1,572 1,528 1,494 1,744 t Capacity Is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes 2 FTE=Full Time Equivalent Enrollment (I a 1/2 day Kindergarten student= .5). 8 In Fall 2004,9th grade moved to the high schools which provided increased capacity at Middle School level ' 4 Kent Junior High dosed for remodel and re-purposing in 2004-05 with students served at five other Middle Schools. KJ vnll reopen as Mill Creek Middle School in Fall 2005 with a Technology Academy serving 7th grade students from other service areas , Capacity for Mill Creek Middle School&Technology Academy will be determined when new programs are in place 5 2004-2005 total classroom relocatable capacity is 1,843. 5 Facility needs are pending review. , Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 April 2005 Page 19 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH - Grades 9 - 12 3 SCHOOL YEAR 2004-2005 2005-2006 1 2006-2n07 2007-2008 1 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 Acival P R O J E C T E D Senior High Permanent Program Capacity 5,822 8,104 8,104 8,104 8,104 8,104 8,104 New Permanent Senior High Construction ' ]Grade level recon8guratlon-90m grade students moved to high schools in Fall 2004 Classrooms added at three high schools Estimated program capacity 2,282 Senior High#5 (Unfunded) 4 1,000 Subtotal 8,104 8,104 8,104 8,104 8,104 8,104 9,104 Relocatable Capacity Required 's4 93 279 496 651 589 589 0 tTOTAL CAPACITY ' 8,197 8.383 8,600 8,755 8,693 8,693 9,104 FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 268 6,182 8,382 8,587 8,735 8,666 8,674 8,715 i SURPLUS DEFICIT CAPACITY 15 1 13 20 27 19 389 Number of Relocstables Required 3 9 1s 21 19 19 0 1 ' Capacity is based on standard of service for ram cap acity parity and updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 FTE=Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment,excluding College-only Running Start students ' a Grade level reconfiguration-All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004. 4 Facility needs are pending review. ' Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A Aprl 2005 page 20 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ' MIDDLE SCHOOL - Grades 7 - 8 3 SCHOOL YEAR 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-200e 2008-2009 2009.2010 2010-2011 ' Actual P R O J E C T E D Middle School Program Capacity I 5,984 5,168 5,968 5,968 5,968 5,968 5,968 New Capacity from Grade R000nilguration 3 Grade level reoonflguration-gth grade students moved to high schools in 2004 , 4 Kent Junior High dosed for remodel&re-purposing In 2004-05-Will reopen as Mill Creek Middle School 7a in Fab 2005 Estimated program capacity -816 800 Subtotal 5,168 5,968 5,968 5,968 5,968 5,968 5,968 Relocatable Capacity Required t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , TOTAL CAPACITY 113 5,168 5,968 5,968 5,968 5,968 5,968 5,968 FTE ENROLLMENT 1 PROJECTION 2 4,464 4,431 4,399 4,419 4,472 4,508 4,619 SURPLUS DEFICIT CAPACITY 704 1,537 1,569 1,549 1,496 1,460 1,349 No Relocatables Required , r Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 FTE=Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment/Projection 3 Grade level reconfiguration-All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004. ' 4 Kent Junior High closed for remodel and re-purposing in 2004-05 with students served at five other Middle Schools. KJ will reopen as MITI Creek Middle School In Fall 2006 with a Technology Academy serving 7th grade students from other service areas , Capacity for Mill Creek Middle School&Technology Academy will be determined when new programs are In place Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B Apnl 2005 Page 21 , KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY - Grades K - 6 SCHOOL YEAR 2004-2005 2005-2006 I 2006-2007 2007-2008 1 2008-2009 2009-2010 2o1a2o11 Actual P R 0 J E C T E D ' [Elementary Permanent Program Capacity 13,290 13,706 13,706 13,706 13,706 13,706 14,206 ' Kent Mountain View Academy t 416 New Permanent Elementary Construction Elementary#31 (Unfunded)4 500 Subtotal 13,706 13,706 13,706 13,706 13,706 14,206 14,206 Relocatabie Capacity Required 2 0 0 0 48 288 96 264 TOTAL CAPACITY 2 13,706 13,706 13,706 13,754 13,994 14,302 14 470 ' FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 3 1 13,125 13,222 13,487 13,751 13,989 14,287 14,464 SURPLUS EFICIT CAPACITY 581 484 219 3 5 15 6 ' Number of Rei0catables Required 0 0 0 2 12 4 11 Kent Mountain View Academy is a special program at the former Grandview School serving students in Grades K-12. The school building(formerly Kent Learning Center&Grandview Elem.)was designed as an elementary school 2 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 3 FTE =Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or Projection (Kindergarten @ 5 &excluding ECE) Kindergarten protection is at 5 FTE although most schools provide Full Day Kindergarten with alternative funding 4 Facility needs are pending review. Kent Schod District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C April 2005 Page 22 V I I I Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District , plans to finance improvements for the years 2005 - 2006 through 2010 - 2011. The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on voter approval of future bond issues, collection of , impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation _ fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. Kent Elementary #27a, which opened in January 1999 as a replacement for the ' original Kent Elementary School, was the last elementary school for which the District received state matching funds under the current state funding formula. Millennium Elementary #30 which opened in the fall of 2000 was the last elementary school that received funding approval from voters. Voters approved a $69.5 million bond issue for Capital Construction and Improvements in February 2002. This will partially fund building additions at three high schools which coincided with moving 9th grade students to the senior high in September 2004. The District anticipates receiving state matching funds and is utilizing impact fees for the senior high school additions. Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary and high school level and unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future. Some funding is secured for additional portables and some will be funded from impact fees. , For the Six-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Facilities Department. Please see pages 25-26 for a summary of the cost basis. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 23 � ! L. _ a ■ & 0 07 $ � � § � R ° _ _in _ d § ■■ co $ Kz } � R ( / \ • LO r ! a . § E ! K ) \ ® 22 k $ ) kui t ■ a E § � 7 & 2 • L \ $ a ) ! § ! ® k r \ 7 ) K / k - - � 2 & t § ■ | � $ - � 2 « $ ® § ■ � � _ LL 2 2 B E J / 2 \ 2 \ ) @ \ $ j u t . . w a . < 2 � f / { Q § o a 2 I 1 7 $ 2 $ ) I ) § 0 2 f f � \ ) & L ) LL � , . 3 . V I I I Finance Plan - Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last elementary school, with inflation factor, and projected cost of the next ' elementary school. Elementary School Cost Projected Cost , Millennium Elementary #30-o n 2000 $12,182,768 , Current cost of Elementary#31 $14,952,532 , Projected cost of Elementary#31 in 2009 $17,500,000 For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last high school, with inflation factor and projected cost of the next high school: Senior High School Cost Projected Cost Kentlake High School (Opened in 1996) $44,600,000 , Current cost for Senior High School #5 $42,615,821 adjusted for capacity of- 1000 Projected cost of High School #5 in 2010 $52,000,000 ' Construction cost of the additions to three high schools: Senior High School Additions Projected Cost Total , Addition to Kent-Meridian $7,000,000 Addition to Kentrid a $13,600,000 , Addition to Kentwood $11,200,000 ' Construction cost of additions to $31,800,000 3 High Schools I ' Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 25 a/b V I I I Finance Plan - Cost Basis Summary (Continued) Site Acquisition Cost ' The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 on page 26 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. ' District Adjustment for 2005 ' The impact fee calculations on pages 28 and 29 include a "District Adjustment" which is equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas drive out for this year and adjusted for increase in the Consumer Price Index. The reasons 1 for this adjustment include: 1)the districts long-term commitment to keep impact fee increases as minimal as possible, and 2) our community's overwhelming support of Initiative 695. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 25 a/b U O N p Q g cl) to O N � M E s w m o• m M to 4 , tD NNO COW)p'CD Mpp- GV �{Ny� OND �p"Olpp�' to Q �cOD pp S �p JA ti��D ff�A Oppt0 H D �pp N O Ot A O D O tAItp tn pO hp N tr��/p! h ep fV � No � NLo O � M � N d NNM � co � 4 49 M(Mti a N t - p p O N LdM C o �t0 n ~ 10 N N m —Q, a3 � $ , � COD W cr y IL ` z ' Z Cq - - s CL Q cl) ' m m m m cry Q tv E w aEi ? t = o w E a E Epp _ T�� ` U5 , m �_ C U) Y C W E5 Y W (R Z 2 to Y Y Y [!A 2 0 63 0 (h S a Z a z W �ca m a a b > > z rc rn > > > m G it N v h v N r m W � IKENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors-Single Family Student Generation Factors-Multi-Family Faementary- _ _(Grades K-6) 0.482 Elementary _ . .Q.293 Middle School (Grades 7-8) 0.161 Middle School Senior High (Grades 9 - 12) 0.284 Senior High 0.114 ' Total 0.927 Total 0.476 Projected Student Capacity OSPI -Square Footage per Student r ' Elementary 500 Elementary 80 Middle School 1,065 Middle School 110 Senior High 1,000 Senior High 120 Special Education 140 Required Site Acreage per Facility ' Elementary (required) 11 Average Site Cost 1 Acre Middle School (required) 21 Elementary $108,091 Senior High (required) 32 Middle School $52,563 Senior High $93,955 New Facility Construction Cost Elementary' $17,500,000 Temporary Facility Capacity 8r Cost Middle School $0 Elementary @ 24 $94,200 Senior High ' $52,000,000 Middle School Q 29 $0 See cost basis on Pg.25 a Senior High @ 31 $94,200 Temporary Facility Square Footage State Match Credit Elementary 71,652 Current State Match Percentage 54.29% Middle School 27,000 Senior High 20,272 Total 4% 118,924 Area Cost Allowance-Cost/Sq. Ft Current Area Cost Allowance $129.81 Permanent Facility Square Footage I Elementary 1,475,936 Middle School 651,273 District Average Assessed Value Senior High 1,007,522 Single Family Residence $242,558 1 Total 96% 3,134,731 Total Facilities Square Footage District Average Assessed Value Elementary 1,547,588 Multi-Family Residence $76,682 Middle School 678,273 Senior High 1,027,794 Total 3,253,655 Capital Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 Current /$1,000 Tax Rate $1.84 Developer Provided Sites/Facilities Value 0 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Dwelling Units 0 Current Bond Interest Rate 4.57% Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 27 I KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost par Single Family Residence Formula. ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Capacity)x Student Generation Factor red Site Acreage I Average Site CosVAcre Faci y Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary) 11 $108,091 500 0.482 $1,148 20 A2 (Middle School) 21 $0 1,065 0.161 $0 A3 (Senior High) 32 $93,955 1,000 0.284 $853.86 0 927 A—> $2,000.06 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost FadMy Capaty Student Fedor Footage Rafw B 1 (Elementary) $17,500,000 500 0.482 0.96 $16,19520 B 2 (Middle School) $0 1,065 0.161 0.96 $0 B 3 (Senior High) $52,000,000 1.000 9.2ea 0.96 $14,177.28 0.927 B—> $30,372.48 , Temporary Facility Cost par Single Family Residence Formula ((Facility Coat/Fad x Student Factor)x ffe=ry/Total Square Fooso Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $94,200 24 OA82 004 $75 67 C 2 (Middle School) $0 29 0.161 004 $0 C 3 (Senior High) $94,200 31 0.284 0.04 $34.52 0.927 C--> $110.19 State Match Credit par Single Family Residence Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x District Match% x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance SPI Sq.Ft/Student District Match% Student Fader D 1 (Elementary) $129.81 60 0.5429 0482 $2,717.47 D 2 (Middle School) $129.81 110 0 0 161 $0 D 3 (Senior High) $129.81 120 0.5429 0.284 $2.401.75 D—> $6,119.22 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value $242,558 , Current Capital Levy Rate/$1,000 $1.84 Current Bond Interest Rate 4 57% Years Amortized (10 Years) 10 TC—> $3.517.04 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility/Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC—> 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $2,000.06 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $30,372.48 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $110.19 Subtotal $32,482.73 D = State Match Credit per Residence $5,119 22 TC=Tax Credit per Residence $3,517.04 Subtotal $8,636 26 Total Unfunded Need $23,846 47 ' 50%Developer Fee Obligation $11,923 FC=Facility Credit Of applicable) 0 District Adjustment (See Page 25 for explanation) ($7,148) Net Fee Obligation per Single Family Residence $4,775 Kent School District Six-Year Capita(Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 28 , KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acra)/Fadi! Ca aci )x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage I Average She Cost/Acre adlity Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary) 11 $108,091 500 0 293 $696.75 A 2 (Middle School) 21 $0 1.065 0 069 $0 A 3 (Senior High) 32 $93,955 1.000 0 114 $342.75 0 476 I A—> $1,039.50 Permarent Facility Construction Cost per Multifamily Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility x Student Factor x Permanent/Total S uare F eootag Ratio) Co istrudbn Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Rana_. B 1 (Elementary) $17.500,000 500 0293 096 $9,844.80 B 2 (Middle School) $0 1,056 0.069 0.96 $0 B 3 (Senior High) $52,000,000 1,000 0.114 096 $5.690.88 1 0.476 B—> $15.535.68 Tamporary,Facility Cost per Multl-Famly Residence Unit Formula. ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(remporary/Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facilely Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $94,200 24 0.293 0.04 $46.00 C 2 (Middle School) $0 29 0.069 0.04 $0 1 C 3 (Senior High) $94,200 31 0.114 004 $13.86 0 476 C—> $59.86 State Match Credit per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x District Match% x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance SPI Sq Fl /Student I District Match% Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $129 81 80 0.5429 0.293 $1,651.91 D 2 (Middle School) $129.81 110 0 0 069 $0 D 3 (Senior High) $129.81 120 0.5429 0114 $964.08 D—> $2,615.99 Tax Credit per Multi-Famiy Residence Unit Average MF Residential Assessed Value $76,082 Current Capital Levy Rate/$1,000 $1.84 Current Bond Interest Rate 4.57% Years Amortized (10 Years) 10 TC—> $1,111.87 Developer Provided Facility Credit Fadli /Site Value Dwallin Units 0 0 FC—> 0 Fes Rscap A = Site Acquisition per Multi-Family Unit $1,039.50 B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $15,535.68 C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $59 86 Subtotal $16,635 04 D = State Match Credit per MF Unit $2,615 99 TC=Tax Credit per MF Unit $1.111 87 Subtotal - $3,727 86 Total Unfunded Need $12.907 18 50% Developer Fee Obligation $6,454 FC=Facility Credit(d applicable) 0 District Adjustment (See Page 25 for explanation) ($3,514) Net Fee Obligation per Multi-Family Residence Unit $2,940 Kent School District Stir-Year Capital Facilities Plan Apn1 2005 Page 29 IX Summary of Changes to April 2004 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the April 2004 Plan are summarized here. Voters approved funding for additions at three high schools to accommodate new growth and moving a grade students to senior highs. This has provided additional capacity for grades 7-8 at middle schools. Kent Junior High is dosed for remodeling and re-purposing in 2004-05 and will re-open as Mill Creek Middle School in 2005-06. Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in Gass size as well as program r changes. Reduction in class size for Student Achievement Initiative 728 is reflected in this update. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement of portables between facilities. Student enrollment forecast is updated annually. At this time, enrollment projections ' reflect need for future additional capacity at elementary and high school level. The district expects to receive state matching funds for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future. The biennial student generation factor survey was previously updated to reflect changes and grade level reconfiguration. Changes reflected no adjustment for occupancy. Survey data is included as Appendix E. Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors include: , ITEM Graderrype FROM TO Comments Student Generation Factor Elem 0 482 0.482 Updated for 91°Grade Single Family(SF) MS 0.161 0.161 Reconfiguration. SH 0.284 0.284 No change required this year. Total 0.927 0.927 Student Generation Factor Elem 0.293 0.293 Updated for a Grade Multi-Family(MF) Ms 0.069 0.069 Reconfiguration SH 0.114 0.114 No change required this year. , Total 0.476 0.476 State Match Credit 53.30% 54.29% Per OSPI (+99%) Area Cost Allowance(Boeckh Index) $129 81 $129.81 Per OSPI Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SF $234,279 $242,558 Per Puget Sound ESD AV-Average of Condominiums&Apts. MF $74,065 $76,682 Per Puget sound ESD , Debt Service Capital Levy Rate/$1000 $1.68 $1.84 Per King County Assessment General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 4.35% 4.57% Market Rate Impact Fee- Single Family SF $4,056 $4,775 Change to fee-$719 , Impact Fee- Multi-Family MF $1,762 $2,940 Change to fee-$1178 1 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 30 ! X Appendixes ! Appendix A: Calculations of Capacities for Elementary Schools ! Appendix B: Calculations of Capacities for Middle Schools _ ! Appendix C: Calculations of Capacities for Senior High Schools Appendix D: Use of Relocatables Appendix E: Student Generation Factor Survey ! 1 i 1 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2005 Page 31 N M CL z Y _ z _ W e a n N w gg n n e� n n N in n R n n g c W LU 82a88m 8885353800 � � B �? 8538 � � W c.pp qq mm e � + � N N 7a Y A N e O O O r O e e O N O O e O e O p e O O c C fffiV p+ O O ► N N O r r N O e Pl O O � E � N $ cg + {oJ Q c a � Co a Z J 44 Q ggWv ww G cQ � iZ . ! z LU LU + E o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � Z N � N r � r o SJ o 0 0 0 � ,. o r o 0 8 0 0 o r $ o $ � R � � t d cj W �? WU N O e N n m N t9 e N '' .O N Pl N N pf N e N N N r N N b N N M wpf 3 �S 3 if 6 e `a i SS ge' a5 n C9 m a 3f O o QQ p p pp pp pp o N�y o pry pO d N en- N N N N N N N N N CV N r N N N N N Or N rOp �ti tl N W ,S z luK 3 A U > 0 W = a_ C }� uW1 U ° a u7 p E g 3 N u CD o g IA r U U U U O W W (9 U' S �' f g ~a K w a 0 E LL Q = a Q Cp F W = a W j• ,� C U U SIE �o gp �e�g`p' p O � C � 9 U U U O W um. U' C7 S YJ a a a C ran N Y W a C� O Y i a 2 $ ^ V4 C A A i c N ch 4 FD -Z M N m = W W LU C 0 0. a 1{I N Na x � N $ N V U QQ� 11 m E e 5 3 FaP n 06 IL W yy ? N O � O A O ♦ � � j O Pf CO LL'f O 3 ¢ d 3 W E J ? O O O N O N 1f1 $ O Y! n C yapx to SQG C ry W O •y��� i z J 9 La A E 2` of N N h I0 N V N a tq N N m N Ti E p O E a n Y ra 01 c Z n o iPi SS $ Qeo W 1) A ' O W ^ a to a eo cn d `V w y W U x m yCtp W �y Z N m m n n n n n p co N V ^ n tot� Y.• • al (-` N N � O � 7 N m O Y 4 u-f Y 1f1 10 a N N � � � e') m q Laa Y Ql W V Z !�uu _ v (p a U m PfGI w G{ U m k n f n N a [y N o chi � tt v Y B m ' M N a0 n CD mCL N N i IX ui O Y Y F ppyyy `� W $_ $ � '�e� o = g c x W v L 4E� L 9q Q Y _ m o Y z N m s�' y Q cc s Qy Y 4J Y Y Y Y Y Y Z y Oco W .25 « C Z b al Y r @ I ° § CD R � k � ` © o cn v C%l $ � @ § , � § 2 s o § e o @ � ] ■ ° § � $ 2 cn w % a o N o N d @ Q � CO) x O ! 0 w o o @ ƒ _LLI CO o . a o 0 % ! a § & x U w o o z % t w § 2 7 a o o 3 Ch o CD # @ 4) , 7 L Ko o n wC-3 o oV) ƒ ILL / 0 A M CD , k 7 k 7 CO) ] - { 2 U) % D k c % g_ k cm k § k \ ` § § m § § § 2 v k _ A _ § E Q § a 2 § & 0 2 2 § 2 If $ a A / 2 / $ co 7 $ § ( $ a; $ J § % 7 § A 4 w ) « 3 p�n �00p m{pp �00ppp o �y p� pp �p a � (n N N 00 Y l'7 N N N N N M f0 N N {p� (m(pp N V � 0 a aO0 Y M n N , N 1A f0 W O M M M N N N r N N v N N N 7 Cl) M N N M N r- OO t5 N U f0 O m aa ♦ p r N n 0y M Oi aD aD pp N r O N (fpp popp ��yy Qp pp Ol p! Of N M ` � lL �.. m N f 0� 01 M r M PJ N M r 00 N M 1- m M m , N 1+f N � OD a0 r Of V1 m l+f m 0)W A m N N N r r r r r r N r r N r r r r ffVV N r r r G O r N w r p 0 0 0 O O O O O O O C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O G m C7 to E mme co a Er1N81 ; as8AI m A N < m8 v v -Varvv � Ne � � 'Tu� n0 C W 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p V pl� aa�� to C%l a p m p ap 8 8 app S ♦ 8 �D; co aD r aD N O m aO�O NO N a0 O O aD C r, go O Op M aA0 m o N N fV M � F- O O O O r r r r O O O O O o r O 0 r r O O r O O r O r O O O O r r O r 0 C; N 0 pppp DD N N N pppp m �7 0 W a �p O M M M N N r'M ap m M O ~ (n r OD r O a r N 00 M r M N N m 0 " b) {O N N r m r M 1- NV P V M N r N Mrrrmr . m < PV NMNOOWM CD m M r r M r OT <O y m O N �j In O N N M M PS In N M N O '� N O N v r r r v �„ u) M M f• r r 0 r r r M r r �i a W M O {p M le 0y N m O N W O h N 0 N O aD 10 r N r N 10 V N co N m r N N Z J ri d 00 Z i.i m P N I� N M N $ 9 08 m 8 N a r O a O N r O m M w 0 N ' � CO N m M r U C j 0 CD lll��� N M N r In N ti m N N r r G r N eM- m N N 0 (jf Y � W O x W W W U WppD U p z 0. 2001yx2 S S K U W W 2U W y E 3 5 W IL � Y W O o o > a m 0 � a g � � 3 � � E 3U. — p pptgp > m m q C ? (J Y C G Y V rz OCq 4 a O C `� C U.a S li 4 '� W j m ,y 5 fn N N u j � ao � U1 C Y n m ® m Q q ' A c n 8 9 m wif a m y 6§g v e U U m 3 a� A `2 c a g s x � � C7 m x 8 bgssW o m °° � i m {aa E_ 31s 3g m m m c� a W W I LL W x 2 2 2 S Y J J J Z Z 0_ O_ 0_' Q' A 0) 47 m P ; Y N ^ 2 m ^ m V) � < O A 1n p r W r C e^ N t'> O 1 O O D O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C aO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C no �p epp o C7 l7 M N lh O N N N 1� N N (/ N G O O O C O O O G O O O O O O O O O Q O C G o G O o o O o o o O O O G G (n Of •'" O N tN7 N to O N m +� CO H OD 0 tD N OI b m N OD00 � C Z O 1L fnG fV n W N N l01 A Cn0 N m r v h U o tq W Do Z C W IL 0 cm VJ V J Z u w M � � w � vzi a � a w p o � W I w Y W cq E o a � � m � g r E uj g l LL Y C a _ c y q W a V m !� ? S2 g 1 5 e- W i 31405 18th Ave So. • Federal Way Federal Way WA Public Schools 98003-5433 A • • Every Student,a Reader Tel 253 945 2000 www fv dwednetedu of APO Q May 25, 2005 Charlene Anderson City of Kent 220 South 4th Avenue Kent WA 98032 Dear Charlene, Enclosed is a copy of the Federal Way School District 2006 Capital Facilities Plan. The Federal Way School District Board of Education adopted this plan on May 24, 2005. I have also enclosed the report of Impact Fee collections and expenditures for calendar year2004. Please let me know if you have any questions about the changes in the CFP for Federal Way Schools My direct line is (253) 945-2071 or email at gwalkel @fw,,d wednet edu Thanks for your help preparing this plan. Sincerely, en Walker Enrollment and Demographic Analyst I t � l � g i 9 � I w IL Ln Y S 0 m v Ln `L d G �Ea W W V U. O W 3 # 6 g9C2 a ! c=iaoo } m } d U. a 3 � WoLL U W m ¢ W 7 W COi LL CD 0 V O MQ m O W c (_7 a � 2 jS 4 � a w S a �s m N o c r � m m o O IA 1` 1- a O O aa N .-- co er N M M I(1 O co M N M ? 01 N m ... I� C IA O) V O V' 0 c0 N , c_ U � ^ I �- N N N M CO 1� C � 1, 0) a � 0 ti M cV ~ F= 8 a M u�X V M 00 C 7 N ..1 N t+i P no73 FL r i IJ 6 i ti CO 0 Z a Federal / / Schools 2006 Capital Facilities Plan • - �uu - l+l��u�� i■ 1 I1 r Buitaingfor the Future FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS i 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BOARD OF EDUCATION Ed Barney Evelyn Castellar Charles Hoff Thomas Madden Bob Millen SUPERINTENDENT Thomas R. Murphy j i 1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION iii-v SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction 1 Inventory of Educational Facilities 2 Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities 3 Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities 4 Needs Forecast - New Facilities 5 Six Year Finance Plan 6 SECTION 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Introduction 7 Map -Elementary Boundaries 8 Map - Middle school Boundaries 9 Map - Senior High Boundaries 10 SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction 11 Building Capacities 12-13 Portable Locations 14-15 Student Forecast 16-18 Capacity Summanes 19-23 King County Impact Fee Calculations 24-26 SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2005 PLAN 27-30 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, and the City of Kent Ordinance No 3260 effective March 1996, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 2005 Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2005. This Plan is scheduled for adoption by King County, the City of Kent and the City of Federal Way and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing, jobs, services, culture and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies. Federal Way citizens approved a bond proposal of$83 million in September 1999. This bond provided for Todd Beamer High School ($44 million); Sequoyah Middle School ($17 million); expansion and improvement of existing schools ($9 million), replacement of Truman High School ($6 million) and other general improvements ($7 million). Other planned and completed improvements included in the bond proposal were- parking and pedestrian safety, playgrounds and sports fields, new classroom start-up and music equipment, information systems and networks and emergency communications. A Middle School Transition Team began meeting in May 2001 to develop recommendations for the middle school programs. These recommendations were adopted by the Board of Education on March 25, 2002. The adopted recommendations include block instruction with 2 teacher teams meeting with about 60 students daily for students in the 6`s and 7`s grade. Eighth grade teachers will see 90 students each day This structure lengthens contact time for students with fewer adults and is believed to develop stronger relationships. Fewer transitions for students will provide continuity to the day and promote a calmer campus The 2006 Capital Facilities Plan reflects a reduced capacity to accommodate the middle school block instruction. iii FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION (continued) As smaller class sizes roll forward into the secondary levels, wet Might decline at middle school between 2006 and 2011. This does not diminish the need to open Sequoyah Middle School in the 2005/06 school year. With the opening of Sequoyah Middle School the average enrollment at all middle schools will be between 700 and 800 students. Another initiative that will impact capacity at the secondary schools is the Puget Sound Early College. Highline Community College is offering this program to I Vh and 12'' grade students at the Federal Way campus. The program allows prorrusmg 1 lffi and 12'h grade students the opportunity to complete their high school diploma and the Associate of Arts college degree in their final two years of high school. The district has a cooperative agreement with Head Start for facility use to serve income eligible Pre-Kindergarten students A new Headstart facility on the Harry Truman High School campus opened in January 2005. This facility centralizes Headstart services in the Federal Way community. Headstart was housed at three of the elementary schools in the Federal Way District. Currently the only decentralized program is in a portable facility at Sherwood Forest Elementary The District intends to expand the ECEAP Pre- Kindergarten program. The District is considering offering a Kindergarten through 8`h grade instructional configuration. This program could be offered at an existing site, with appropriate facility changes. Other options for opening this program are new construction or purchase and remodel of an existing building. As the projects from the 1999 bond are finalized, the District is presenting a 20-year plan for the renovation and construction of Federal Way Schools and support buildings. If approved the $245 million bond to be run in 2006 would replace four elementary schools, Lakeland, Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla and one middle school Lakota. Federal Way High School would be replaced and capacity increased by approximately 800 students. Federal Way High School was built in 1938. It has been added onto at least 10 times and currently has an almost maze-like layout. The cost to rebuild is $81 million. The reconstruction would increase the capacity of the high school by 800 students, or by about 33%. Part of this cost is included in the Capital Facilities Plan impact fee calculation. The non-instructional projects included in the 20- year plan will consolidate support services operations at a single location. The current Transportation and Maintenance facility cannot continue to meet the District needs in the future. Nutrition services and other administrative functions will also relocate to this centralized location The proposed bond package includes shared instructional and community facilities. The current stadium would be moved to align with the City of Federal Way Celebration Park sports fields and future Community Center. A performance auditorium is planned for a corner of the Federal Way High School campus. This is a facility that would serve the District schools as well as the community. An environmental instruction and retreat center is proposed for property adjoining Sequoyah Middle School. iv FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 1 - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. A Financial Plan which shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization listed follows this. 1 1' FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES " -ELT. T'ARY SCHOOLS Adelaide 1635 SW 304th Street Federal Way 98023 Brigadoon 3601 SW 336th Street Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 298th Street Auburn 98001 Enterprise 35101 5th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Green Gables 32607 47th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lake Grove 303 SW 308th Street Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35675 32nd Avenue S Auburn 98001 Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Road Federal Way 98003 Meredith Hill 5830 S 300th Street Auburn 98001 Mirror Lake 625 S 314th Street Federal Way 98003 Nautilus 1000 S 289th Street Federal Way 98003 Olympic View 2626 SW 327th Street Federal Way 98023 Panther Lake 34424 1st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368th Street Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 34600 12th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Silver Lake 1310 SW 325th Place Federal Way 98023 Star Lake 4014 S 270th Street Kent 98032 Sunnycrest 24629 42nd Avenue S Kent 98032 Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42nd Avenue S Auburn 98001 Wildwood 2405 S 300th Street Federal Way 98003 Woodmont 26454 16th Avenue S. Des Moines 98198 MIDDLE SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Academy 34620 91h Avenue S Federal Way 98003 1 Illahee 36001 1st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Kilo 4400 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 314th Street Federal Way 98023 Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Road Federal Way 98003 Saghalie 33914 19th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Sequoyah 3450 S 3Wh ST Auburn 98001 Totem 26630 40`h Ave S Kent 98032 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Decatur 2800 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 ' Federal Way 30611 16th Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288th Street Auburn 98001 Todd Beamer 35999 16th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Harry S Truman 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS Merit School 36001 Is' Ave S Federal Way 98003 LEASED SPACES Intemet Academy 32020 Ist Ave S Federal Way 98003 2 r FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CURRENT INVENTORY NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Developed Property Administrative Building 31405 18th Avenue S Federal Way 98003 MOT Site 1066 S 320th Street Federal Way 98003 Central Kitchen 1344 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 Leased Space Community Resource Center 1813 S Commons Federal Way 98003 ECEAP Offices 30819 14'h Ave S Federal Way 98003 Undeveloped Property Site# Location 75 SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW —9.2 Acres 65 S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S — 8.8 Acres 60 E of loth Avenue SW - SW 334th & SW 335th Streets - 10.04 Acres 73 N of SW 320`h and east of 45 h PL SW—23.45 Acres � I S 344th Street&46th Avenue S - 17.47 Acres 92 1" Way S and S 342°d St—Minimal acreage 74 3737 S 360`h St - 47.13 Acres (Part of this site is being used for Sequoyah Middle School) 96 S 308`h St and 14d'Ave S— .36 Acres 81 S 332°d St and Wh Ave S — 20 Acres Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. 3 I FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS Purchase and Relocate Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is Portables Impact Fees. Elementary Schools: Replace Existing Building Future Bond Sales Lakeland, Panther Lake, Sunn crest and Valhalla Lakota Middle School Replace Existing Building Future Bond Sales Federal Way High School Replace Existing Building, Future Bond Sales Increase Capacity Todd Beamer High School Library conversion to increase Impact Fees classroom capacity The District is also planning the replacement of some non-instructional facilities. The District has purchased 20 acres for construction of consolidated facilities for support services functions. Transportation, Nutrition Services, Maintenance and other non-instructional functions will be housed at this centralized location. As part of the 20-year plan, the District intends to increase capacity for high school students include expansion at the Decatur High School site These plans supplant the need for construction of a fifth comprehensive high school. - 1 . 4 i FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST - NEW FACILITIES NEW FACILITY LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS Sequoyah Middle School Site 74 Anticipated source of funds are current bond issues and stare match. f 1 I 1 i 5 ' WL K K K W N yq y e 3 N yy ««yamy �o {V{yy Oq�q N K ° s h S eq � N10K 426 s o o � $ w 00 o O� C F�1 NO a v o 0o H 9 � GGG o Ll 25 25 25 25 N 8 a a a co OC 0 0 — ; 7 tom.' N w b Ln b r1 7 y O p❑ i �3W Un g all � O _ p1 .7 N ; ttl y td ° p Z .• N t1 ? V'1 `O h a0 P • S FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 2- MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools (the District) has twenty-three elementary schools (grades K-5), seven middle school schools (grades 6-8), five senior high schools (grades 09-12) and one school serving students in grades 6 -10 for the 2005/06 school year. The Internet Academy serves grades K-12. In January 2005 the Board of Education adopted new secondary boundanes beginning with 2005/06 school year. The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school, by school type. (Harry S. Truman High School, Merit School, Internet Academy and Federal Way Public Academy serve students from throughout the District). The identified boundaries are reviewed annually. Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs that affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas. The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School Districts are different. If the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single development. I 7 Federal Way Public Schools 57 �EWFARY SCHOOLS MIDDLE SCROD" M .inner Lakelancl I SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS —�g1E!>TiaF / o R , � ► 1 IAA , T���,y. e. «,, a M p III few Lake 0-3 " Tocid Bremner E-91 UI n .��Amp LU M I R ME -• 1� ,. AA Iggp_;j am W-6 PR r— '��� c�� lr f�►`s111 kr �. � �`�•��■qrr ' � 1 PI I'CR Y �'C t .tom A �� I � , �,d! �pnisWrite � • 'K via LA 'el= N Illahee te Federal Way Public Schools Kil•Sacajawea Saghalie Totem 7th Middle School Epp s r�� `•,���' is i�� f �/ mJl yr�� FPS ��n J.yittt dF'' r Lrt rG'r�1= u?J�• �&gYk^r . r I i �jr'•'L"v' i i. t�4 �kf�r �� y , I y.51�>,3. s.:� AYTt..`, !��r.✓. O�i'�ELNPtt � / u Ir �� �" ! "'<t#•r� J. � t F.. ' 1' cA 1T 'Yr 'r {Y'cf� 6� je' T�eePp .� �1 t} e � f 1. r ,1r �� [6{'`.,,S,u, [�" y'i �����i���� '.l ♦ L ��f 4��.4-,.r. '�R.�. �G�!U�������Cl��.- �� m � yL.� ! �. i°-Y �'+�. �7`{ rF '1' ".�c'` r i` c 2. •. F', � wz ��� ec 1.`.Frl"� a C11'i 7 fro ° x L v RI! FvrC r!p±�•�7�/,� l y�,{ y �' a y .�'. t' f e C -�➢'_ lr t� rt. d��.. 5f .f vt 1 cy J� ti A r lc'. *4 .i'' Yn 6- r�K.S c` <tIS g.'" ff ticr• �..:z:{ „1► r a,.a ' >,. C._ C3� ► S ', .,� ,, �,� �ysp��,Et* � �i` � NOW,1� C �f w. d r� •�r A. 4L' ! t � ! r fi n1 �• 6 yam+ � L �� �� - - ., \5-,.•`yy 11.p'.yf�''Sru�.fr1'L7/ i� �'I!�� —�`^. 1��/ x"1Ilkt�4 Ft � fr J 1 11� Federalls • r •• a� ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS MIDDLE SCHOOLS ��. un�0 m rl 10 Mannish Min N4 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS in" F " ,. �t - Em is sunnycreat �■�1k1. . ix Poke 111��� 777 r 1 fill L I 'ICqpmp, ri X E F th ..,�.... �... �I Mif , r ot In � C 'F'eA.1 �r a ` /III'rl. .9 NOR vp .,. Ib N FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities -The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast- 2006 through 2012 Capacity Summaries King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi Family Units i l 1 i 11 i t FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Building Capacities This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. The District has identified a Building Program Capacity for each of the schools in the District. This Full Time Equivalent (FTE) capacity is based on: • The number of classrooms available in each school • Any special requirements at each school In general, the District's current target class size provides that the average class size for a standard classoom for grades K through 2 should be 20 students. For grades 3-5 the target is 25 students. In sixth and seventh grade the students are scheduled with block instruction and see only two teachers for core curriculum Teachers at this level see 60 students per day. At eighth grade, the teachers will see 90 students per day. For grades 9-12 the target class size is 26 students. In the 2004/05 school year, all of the 23 elementary schools offer at least one all day Kindergarten. This program does have capacity impacts, as the classroom is only available for one session of Kindergarten for the full day. i12 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITIES ELEMENTARY BUILDING MIDDLE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount FTE School Name Headcount FTE Adelaide 456 436 Illahee 7" 807 Bri adoon 510 490 Kilo 7" 807 Camelot 347 327 Lakota 750 758 Enterprise 404 384 Saca'awea 774 782 Green Gables 432 412 Sa halie 694 701 Lake Dolloff 490 470 Sequoyah 1 700 707 Lake Grove 424 404 Totem 735 742 Lakeland 450 430 Federal Wa Public Academy 212 214 Mark Twain 465 444 2006 TOTAL 5,463 5518 Meredith Hill 437 417 Mirror Lae 379 59 J*Middle School Average 875 Nautilus 475 455 Olympic View 424 404 SENIOR HIGH BUILDING Panther Lake 437 417 PROGRAM CAPACITY ' Rainier View 5 42 Sherwood Forest 494 474 School Name Headcount FTE Silver Lake 502 482 Decatur 1,269 1343 Star Lake 474 454 Federal Way 1,456 1541 Sunn crest 424 404 Thomas Jefferson 1,435 1519 Twin Lakes 450 430 Todd Beamer 1,523 1612 Valhalla 477 457 Truman High School 200 200 Wildwood 445 425 lFederal Way Public Academy 133 133 Woodmont 375 355 2006 TOTAL 6,016 6,348 2006 TOTAL 10,216 j 755 [7S-e`m7rM'gN Average 1,421 1 19- jElementary Average 444 1 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount FTE Merit School 16 16 Notes- 2005 TOTAL 16 16 * Federal Way Public Academy capacity is not used in calculated average. *Truman High School capacity is not used in calculated average. 13 } FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Portable Locations The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not an efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students until permanent facilities can be built or boundary adjustments can be made. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. It is the practice and philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that portables are not acceptable as permanent facilities. The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for temporary educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. 1. t i 14 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN , - PORTABLE LOCATIONS PORTABLES LOCATED PORTABLES LOCATED AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS AT SENIOR HIGHS NON NON INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUMONAL INSTRUCTIONAL INSI UMONAL Adelaide 3 Decatur 5 Bri adoon 1 Federal Way 1 Camelot I Thomas Jefferson 3 Enterprise 3 Green Gables 1 TOTAL 9 Lake Dolloff 2 Lake Grove 2 Lakeland 2 Mark Twain 3 Meredith Hill 3 PORTABLES LOCATED Mirror Lake 4 AT SUPPORT FACILITIES Nautilus Olympic View 2 [TOTAL OT 1 Panther Lake 3 DC 3 Rainier View 3 4 Sherwood Forest 4 Silver Lake 4 Star Lake 2 2 Sunn crest 1 1 HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES Twin Lakes Valhalla 1 1 ISherwood Forest 1 W ildwood 4 Woodmont 3 Total T T L 54 PORTABLES LOCATED AT MIDDLE SCHOOLS NON INSTRUCTIONAL INSIROMONAL Illahee 5 Kilo 7 Lakota 3 Saca awea 4 Sa hahe 4 Totem 5 Merit 2 30 15 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Student Forecast Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students. iThe basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a I stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The 1 district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted. A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level. The Enrollment Masterm software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment. In November of 2001, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District. The report was complete in January 2002. The model used to forecast next year's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, 16 r FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ` -ttssumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county-wide average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections. The report substantiated that for next year, Federal Way expects little or no growth. The long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes in the 5- 19 age group for King County. Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of something else (e.g. population) or that enrollment will nurror some projected trend for the school-age population over time. The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2015. This model produces a projection that is between 24,000 and 26,000 when applied to the low, medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models. Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington. Near term projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by current local economic conditions. The District tracks new development from four permitting jurisdictions. Long range planning assumes a student yield from proposed new housing E consistent with historical growth patterns. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school district in the future. f 1 17 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections f �Supq�i fled FTE(K Headcount= 5 FTE,Middle School FTE=99 Headcount;Senior High FTE= 945Headcount) Total K-12 Percent Calendar Yr School Year Elementary Middle School Senior High FTE Change 2000 1999-00 11,641 5,156 4,380 21,176 2001 2000-01 11,640 5,305 4,338 21,283 05% 2002 2001-02 11,498 5,337 4,467 21,302 am 2003 2002-03 11,202 5,454 4,437 21,093 -10% 2004 ' 2003-04 9,127 5.524 6,408 21,059 -0.2% 2005 2004-05 9,164 5,473 6,515 21,152 04% 2006 B2005-06 91119 5,410 6,629 21,158 0.0% 2007 P2006-07 9,203 5,282 6,744 21,229 0.3% 2008 P2007-08 9,444 5,206 6,844 21,494 1.2% 2009 P2008-09 9,631 5,217 6,828 21,676 0.8% 2010 P2009-10 9,76S 5,283 6,813 21,861 0.8% 2011 P2010-11 9,912 S,393 6,695 21,999 0.6% 2012 P2011-12 10,021 5,500 6,681 22,202 0.9% *New Configuration Elementary K-5 Middle School 6-8 Nigh School 9-12 Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast 23,000 1 5°k 22,000 21.000 0 5% _ c 20,000 o m v n m a = 19,000 0 0% m c 6 T' u 18,000 0 -0 5% 17,000 A 0% 16,000 15,000 -15% Val 1po o� bi ba 100 School Year =FTE t Percent of Change 18 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Capacity Summaries All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and Senior High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, middle school, and senior high levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year. 19 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY-ALL GRADES Budget -- Projected-- Calendar Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 CAPACITY School Year 2005106 2006/07 2007108 2008/09 2009110 20010/11 20011/12 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 21,011 21,011 20,985 20,959 20,933 20,933 20,933 FTE CAPACITY 20,930 21,611 21,585 21,559 21,533 21,533 21,533 Add or subtract changes to capacity Special Education Changes (26) (26) (26) (26) Sequoyah Middle School 707 Increase Capacity at Federal Way High 800 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 21,011 20,985 20,959 20,933 20,933 20,933 21,733 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 21,611 21,585 21,559 21,533 21,533 21,533 22,333 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 21,158 21,229 21,494 21,676 21,861 21,999 22,202 288 Internet Academy Enrollment(AAFTE) 288 288 288 288 288 288 Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 20,870 20,941 21,206 21,388 21,573 21,711 21,914 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM FTE CAPACITY 741 644 353 145 (40) (178) 419 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY Current Portable Capacity 2,325 2,525 2,725 2,725 2,725 2,725 2,462 Add/Subtract Portable Capacity Add New Portable Capacity 106 2p0 Deduct Portable Capacity Adjusted Portable Capacity 2,525 2,725 2,725 2,725 2,725 2,725 2,462 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3,266 3,369 3,078 2,870 2,685 2,547 2,881 ' 20 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY-ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Budget -- Projected-- Calendar Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 CAPACITY School Year 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 20010/11 2001 I/12 BUILDING PROGRAM HEAD COUNT CAPACITY 10,216 10,190 10,164 10,138 10,112 10,112 10,11J FTE CAPACITY 9,755 9,729 9,703 9,677 9,651 9,651 9,651 1. Special Education Changes (26) (26) (26) (26) Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 10,190 10,164 1 10,138 10,112 10,112 1 10,112 1 10,11 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 9,729 9,703 1 9,677 9,651 1 9,651 1 9,651 1 9,651 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 9,199 9,203 9,444 9,631 9,765 9,912 10,02 2. Internet Academy(AAFTE) 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 9,167 9,171 9,412 9,599 9,733 9,880 9,989 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY 562 532 265 52 (82) (229) (338) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3. Current Portable Capacity 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 Add/Subtract portable capacity Adjusted Portable Capacity 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 1,912 1,882 1,615 1 1,402 1,268 1 1,121 1,012 NOTES: 1 Add Special Education and ECEAP Programs This reduces Basic Education capacity in the school years indicated. 2 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities 3 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other adnumstrative techniques which can be used to temporanly house students until permanent facilities are available.This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory Age and condition of the portables , will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. 21 ' FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITES PLAN ' CAPACITY SUMMARY-MIDDLE SCHOOLS Budget - Projected-- Calendar Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 CAPACITY School Year 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 20010/11 20011/12 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 4,763 5,470 5,470 5,470 5,470 5,470 5,470 FTE CAPACITY 4,811 5,518 5,518 5,518 5,518 5,518 5,518 1. Sequoyah Middle School 707 ' Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5,470 5,470 5,470 5,470 1 5,470 5,470 5,470 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 1 5,518 5,518 L 5,518 5,518 5,518 5,518 5,518 ' ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 5,410 5,282 5,206 5,217 5,283 5,393 5,500 2 Intemet Academy (AAFTE) 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 5,318 5,190 5,114 5,125 5,191 5,301 5,408 ' SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY 152 280 356 345 279 169 62 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3. Current Portable Capacity 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 Add/Subtract portable capacity ' Add new portable capacity Adjusted Portable Capacity 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 ' SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE 4. CAPACITY 902 1,030 1,106 19095 1,029 919 812 ' NOTES: 1. Sequoyah Middle School to Open 2. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 3 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. ' The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. 4. Capacity for unhoused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and no planning time in some classrooms. ' 22 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITES PLAN ` CAPACITY SUMMARY-SENIOR HIGH§CHOOLS Budget -- Projected-- Calendar Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 CAPACITY School Year 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 20010/11 20011/ BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 6,032 6,032 6,032 6,032 6,032 6,032 6,032 FTE CAPACITY 6,364 6,364 6,364 6,364 6,364 6,364 6,364 Add or subtract changes in capacity Increase Capacity at Federal Way High School 1#1}p Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 6,032 6,032 6,032 6,032 6,032 6,032 6,832 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 6,364 6,364 6,364 61364 6,37-F 6,364 7,164 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 6,629 6,744 6,844 6,828 6,813 6,695 6,681 1. Internet Academy(AAFTE) 164 164 164 164 164 164 164 Basic Ed without Internet Academy 6,465 6,580 6,680 6,664 6,649 6,531 6,517 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY T(4373) (548) (648) (632) (617) (499) 315 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 2. Current Portable Capacity 225 425 625 625 625 625 625 3. Add new portable capacity 200 200 Adjusted Portable Capacity425 625 625 625 625 625 625 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE 4. CAPACITY (8) 77 (23) (7) 8 126 940 NOTES: ' 1. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 2. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which ' can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs 3. Add Portable Capacity , 4. Capacity for unhoused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and no planning time in some classrooms. Puget Sound Early College will house approximately 60 of the unhoused students This would provide program ' for additional high school students 23 i FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN iKing County, the City of Federal Way, and the City of Kent Impact Fee Calculations Single and Multi-Family Residences i Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. ' To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substantially adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that distnct. - STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single- farruly units and multi-family units. The factors used in the 2006 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single family units which were constructed in ' the last five (5) years. The multi-family yield is derived from an average of other King County school distncts. - IMPACT FEE CALCULATION ' Following the calculations for the student generation factor is a copy of the Impact Fee Calculation for single family and multi-family units based on King County Code 21A and the ' Growth Management Act. ➢ Temporary Facility Cost is the average cost of a portable purchased within the last 12 ' months. ➢ Site Acquisition Costs is the per acre cost of the last school site purchased (site 45), this is a negotiated purchase price. Plan Year 2006 Plan Year 2005 Collection Year 2006 Collection Year 2005 ' Single Family Units $3393. $2868 Multi-Family Units $ 895. $ 905. ' 24 L 0 m n c W ao ro c7 cn 8i • - vi co N © .- U)i 0 n o m N v m ,- I. F �j a � r ' LLOOOO , OrOO .- O 00 p t Lr) M t �r7 = C O a—) �t �Op O ao0 (&(VI � N O M O O � U7 N O � m '7 CCMMM iD a r N N N 1(1 r N 4V .Q q O r G7 0000000000 Cf C X00 c; fp N8O g [71n mm 0) nmm » _ C 00 O ' � r7n Mwgwpm OO p �j mrN r m 7 Q I m - f7 N M .T- N N �V 0 7 m 0 0 ' 65LL000OOOOOOO 4 � LL OO O Cn 00 a n m Ol l�J N 07 r. Lfl N ' 01 CmD N N n appD m m N m p C E p N N M a a M N (0 11f444 a 0 LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C • LL O O 4 W '0.i W m « r E: S9to00) arn °' �nn � Es ; To N o � c � O Z � vr c Z � � E � anrninC2Nn "tmmEy00n r' H Z :2Ln O N ' C ax - aa , U vF z $ O 0 0 0 0 O) W N n N n a y N c7 Oa0 z 3 Z � d 'Z p z N p Z W ` E C 0` E C m lL .� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a IL O N n , E 1 � 1 o Z Z w w +c+ `o E tm a ' E G E m M Y] N W W W N N c7 E � Cl 0 0 z c zc m y a) Q Z °o Z m V Y m w w ' O o o N m o (LLI 7 C m o (7 W id c m m L p_ Y m F ... W Y m~ C w m LL m o c mm c M L o , G m ' i m = a° 9 amid p Y > > c c m t o m N y ro 7 azT- co 0 O O 0 O O O O O O O 3 m ' �• FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACIUTIES PLAN IMPACT FEE School Site Acquisition Cost: Student Student Facility Cost! Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 000 $0 417 03030 0.0929 $0 $0 Middle School 2l BO $87,747 921 0 2013 0 0410 $418 $85 Sr High 1 20 $173,833 133 0 2013 0 0628 $316 $98 TOTAL $734 1 $184 School Construction Cost: - Student Student ' %Perm Fac! Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost, Cost/ Total Sq Ft Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 961% $0 417 0 3030 0 W29 $0 $0 Middle School 96.60% $18,352,956 921 0 2013 00410 $3,875 $789 ' Sr High 9660% $28,968,637 933 0 2013 0 0628 $6,038 $1,884 TOTAL $9,913 $2.673 Temporary Facility Cost: Student Student %Temp Fac. Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost! Cost/ Total Sq Ft Cost Size SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 3 41% $0 25 0 3030 009291 $0 $0 Middle School 3 40°k $0 25 0 2013 0 0410 $0 $0 Sr High 3 40% $82,l5] 25 0.2013 0 0628 $22 $7 TOTAL $22 $7 State Matching Credit Calculation: Student Student Boeck Cost/ Sq. Ft State Factor Factor Cosy Cost/ Sq Ft Student Match SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary $129 81 90 0 00� 0 3030 00929 $0 $0 . _.._. ........_.. Middle School $129.81 l 17 0 00% 0 2013 00410 $O $0 New Sr High $129 81 130 59 97% 020131 0 0628 $2,037 $636 Total $2,037 $636 ' Tax Payment Credit Calculation SFR MFR Average Assessed Value (April 2005) $224,943 $53,384 Capital Bond Interest Rate(March 2005) 4 57% 4 57% y Net Present Value of Average Dwelling $1,773,800 $420,962 Years Amortized 10 10 Property Tax Levy Rate $1 04 $1 04 Present Value of Revenue Stream $1,845 $438 Single Family Multi-Family Residences Residences Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost $ 734 $ 184 Permanent Facility Cost $ 9,913 $ 2,673 Temporary Facility Cost $ 22 $ 7 State Match Credit $ (2,037) $ (636) Tax Payment Credit $ (1,845) $ (438) Sub-Total $ 6,787 $ 1,790 50%Local Share $ 3,393 $ 895 HIM act Fee $ 3,393 $ 895 26 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ' - `-SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2005 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The 2006 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document, based on the 2005 Capital Facilities Plan. The changes between the 2005 Plan and the 2006 Plan are listed below. SECTION I-THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ' SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN The Six Year Finance Plan has been rolled forward to reflect 2006/2012 SECTION III- SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION CAPACITY , Elementary school capacity reflects program changes for the 2005/06 school year. Middle School capacity changes reflect the opening of Sequoyah Noddle School. Elementary capacity includes space for All Day Kindergarten programs at every elementary school. ' Building Program Capacities are found on page 13. PORTABLES , The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page 15. STUDENT FORECAST , The Student Forecast now covers 2006 through 2012. Enrollment history and projections are found on page 18. , CAPACITY SUMMARY The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 20-23. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY CODE 21A The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors. The adjustment made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 2005 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2006 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page 29. 27 ' FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ' IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2005 TO 2006 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in student Generation factors between the 2005 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2006 Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age of the developments and the year placed in the survey. The Student Generation worksheet is found on page 25. SITE ACOUISMON COSTS The negotiated purchase price for the Todd Beamer High School site was $80,000 per acre. This is the base line cost for acreage for Sequoyah Middle School. The assessed valuation for the Federal Way Public Academy land was $521,000 at the time of purchase. ' The calculated cost per acre in the impact fee calculation is a weighted calculation using the $80,000 per acre baseline cost and the assessed valuation at the time of purchase for the Federal Way Public Academy. Federal Way Public Academy is a 3-acre site. The grade span for this facility is grades 6-10. Middle school accounts for 60% of the cost, senior high is 40%. Sequoyah: 20 x$80,000 = $1,600,000 FWPA $ 312,900 (60 % of$521,500, 1.8 acres of 3 acre parcel) Total Cost $1,912,900 Cost/Acreage $1,912,900/21.8= $87,747 cost per acre Senior High FWPA $ 208,600 (40% of$521,500, 1.2 acres of 3 acre parcel) Cost/Acreage $208,600/1.2 = $173,833 cost per acre ' SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COSTS The cost for Federal Way Public Academy(exclusive of land)is $4,921,594. The Federal Way Public Academy costs are split 60% to middle school and 40% to senior high in the impact fee calculation. Middle school construction costs = 60% of $4,921,594 $ 2,952,956 FWPA ' $15,400,000 Sequoyah Total Cost $18,352,956 The total cost for replacing Federal Way High School is projected to be $81m. The capacity of the school would increase from approximately 1500 to 2400 students The Impact Fee calculation used one-third, $27m as the basis for capacity increases at high school. High school construction costs = 40% of $4,921,594 $ 1,9682,637 FWPA $27,000,000 Federal Way High Total Cost $28,9689637 28 E L O • FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2005 TO 2006 ' IMPACT FEE Item From/To Comment r Percent of Permanent Facilities 96.32 to 96.60% Report#3 OSPI , Percent Temporary Facilities 3.68 to 3.40% Updated portable inventory Boeck Cost/Sq. Ft $114.88 to $129.81 Change per OSPI , State Match 59.97 % (No Change) Average Assessed Value SIR— Per Puget Sound Educational ' $213,859 to$224,943 Service District (ESD 121) MFR— ' $44,571 to $53,384 Capital Bond Interest Rate 4.35% to 4.57% Market Rate Popertyr Tax Levy Rate $1.40 to$1.04 King County Treasury Division Square Foot Allocations Legislative Change (Effective Elementary 80 to 90 sq ft 2006/07) Middle School 110 to 117 sq ft High School 120 to 130 sq ft Single Family Student Yield Updated Housing Inventory , Elementary .3138 to.3030 Middle School 1632 to .2013 High School 1695 to .2013 Multi-Family Student Yield Updated Housing Inventory ' Elementary .119 to .0929 Middle School .042 to .0410 High School .053 to .0628 29 , • 31405 18th Ave So *M Federal Way Federal Way,WA Public Schools Tel 253.945 • • Every Student,a Reader Tel 253.945 2000 www fwed wednetedu April 26, 2005 Charlene Anderson Planning Manager City of Kent Planning Department 220 South 4th Avenue Kent WA 98032 ' Dear Charlene, Enclosed you will find a copy of the Environmental Checklist and the accompanying ' Determination of Non-Significance for the Federal Way School Distnct's 2005l06 Capital Facilities Plan. The 14-day comment period to submit written comments or to appeal the decision begins on April 26, 2005 and will continue through 5 00 PM, May 10, 2005. Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional information . Sincerely, Gen Walker, Enrollment and Demographic Analyst DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Issued with a 14 Day comment and appeals period i Description of Proposal: This threshold determination analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the following actions, which are so closely related to each other that they are in effect a single action: 1. The adoption of the Federal Wav Public Schools' 2005/06 Six Year Capital Facilities Plan by the Federal Way Public Schools for the purposes of planning for the facilities needs of the District. 2. The amendment of the King County Comprehensive Plan by King County to include the Federal Way Public Schools' 2005/06 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the King County Comprehensive Plan. t3. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Federal Way and the City of Kent to include the Federal Way Public Schools' 2005/06 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the City of Federal Way and the City of Kent's Comprehensive Plan. This proposal may also involve the amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the Cities of Auburn, and Des Moines to incorporate the Federal Way Public Schools' 2005/06 Capital Facilities Plan into the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. i Proponent: Federal Way Public Schools Location of the Proposal: The Federal Way Public Schools District includes an area of approximately 35 square miles. The cities of Federal Way, Kent, Des Moines andAuburn fall within the District's boundaries, as do parts of unincorporated King County Lead Agency: Federal Way Pi1b1ic'Scho6M 1'1a the lead agency pursuant to WAC=1-97-11-926. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse environmental impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after a review of the completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public upon request. This Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issue. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., May 10, 2005. The responsible official will reconsider the DNS based on timely comments and may retain, modify, or, if significant adverse impacts are likely, withdraw the DNS. If the DNS is retained, it will be final after the expiration of the comment deadline. Responsible Official: Ms. Geri Walker Enrollment and Demographic Analyst , Federal Way Public Schools Telephone: (253) 945-2071 Address: 31405 18th Avenue South , Federal Way WA 98003 You may appeal this determination in writing by 5:00 p.m , May 10 2005 to Gen Walker, ' Federal Way Public Schools, 31405 18th Avenue South,Federal Way, WA 98003. Date of Issue: April 26, 2005 Date Published: April 26, 2005 r 2 ' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAC 197-11-960 Environmental Checklist. Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be Idone) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. I1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ' Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: , Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply" In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for nonproject actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. 2 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: The adoption of a Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan by the Federal Way School District No. 210 for the purposes of planning for the District's facilities needs. The King County, City of Federal Way, and the City of Kent's Comprehensive Plan will be amended to include the District's 2005/06 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Plan Element. This project may also involve the amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the cities of Des Moines and Auburn to incorporate the District's 2005/06 Capital Facilities Plan. A copy of the District's Plan is available for review in the District's offices. 2. Name of applicant: Federal Way School District No. 210. t3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Federal Way School District No. 210 31405 18th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 Contact Person: Ms. Geri Walker Enrollment and Boundary Analyst Telephone: (253)945-2071 4. Date checklist prepared: April 26, 2005 5. Agency requesting checklist: Federal Way School District No. 210 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The Federal Way School District's 2005/06 Capital Facilities Plan is scheduled to be adopted by the District in May 2005. The Capital Facilities Plan will be forwarded to King County, the City of Federal Way and the City of Kent for inclusion in each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. It will also be forwarded to the cities of Des Moines and Auburn for possible inclusion in these 1 jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plans. The District will continue to update the Capital Facilities Plan annually. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review. 3 f ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST , 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The Capital Facilities Plan sets forth the capital improvement `projects that the District plans to implement over the next six years. These include purchase and siting of temporary facilities and construction of a middle school and increasing high school capacity. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be , prepared, directly related to this proposal. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will undergo additional environmental review, when appropriate, as they are developed. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Land use approvals are pending for placing new portable buildings at Federal Way High School, 30611 Wh Ave S, Federal Way; Decatur High School, 2800 SW 320ffi ST, Federal Way and Thomas Jefferson High School,4248 S 2881"St, Auburn WA. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. The District anticipates that King County, the City of Federal Way and the City of Kent will adopt this Capital Facilities Plan into their Comprehensive Plan. The cities of Des Moines and Auburn may also adopt this Capital Facilities Plan into the Capital Facilities Elements of their Comprehensive Plans (when issued). 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project , description.) This is a non-project action. This proposal involves the adoption of the Federal Way School District's 2005/06 Capital Facilities Plan for the purpose of planning the District's facilities needs. The District's Capital Facilities Plan will be incorporated into King County's, the City Federal Way, and the City of Kent's Comprehensive Plans. It may also be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plans of the cities of Des Moines and Auburn. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review A copy of the Capital Facilities Plan may be viewed at the District's offices. i 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ' 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, township, and range, if known. lf- a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. tThe Capital Facilities Plan will affect the Federal Way School District. The District includes an area of approximately 35 square miles. The City of Federal Way, parts of the cities of Kent, Des Moines and Auburn, parts of unincorporated King County, fall within the District's boundaries. A detailed map of the District's boundaries can be viewed at the District's offices. 1 i 1 t 1 � 5 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST , B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS t 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other I I The Federal Way School District is comprised of a variety of topographic land forms and gradients. Specific topographic characteristics of the sites at which the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan are located have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? Specific slope characteristics at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Specific soil types found at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Unstable soils may exist within the Federal Way School District. Specific soil linutations on individual project sites have been or will be identified at the time of project-level environmental review when appropriate. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed , Indicate source of fill. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject, when , appropriate, to project-specific environmental review and local approval at the time of proposal. Proposed grading projects, as welt as the purpose, type, quantity, and source of any fill materials to be used have been or will be identified at that time f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. It is possible that erosion could occur as a result of the construction projects currently proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan. The erosion impacts of the individual projects have been or will be evaluated on a site-specific basis at the time of project-specific environmental review when appropriate Individual projects have been or will be subject to local approval processes. 6 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings?) The proposed new school facilities included in the Capital Facilities Plan as well as the proposed renovation projects will require the construction of impervious surfaces. The extent of any impervious cover constructed will vary with each capital facilities project included in the Capital Facilities Plan. This issue has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth, if any: IThe erosion potential of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and appropriate control measures have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Relevant erosion reduction and control requirements will be met. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Various emissions, many construction-related, may result from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The air-quality impacts of each project have been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect the individual projects included in the ' Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. ' c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: The individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review when appropriate and relevant local approval processes. The District will be required to comply with all applicable air regulations and air pernut requirements. Proposed measures specific to the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. r t ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 3. Water t —a Surface: - 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is a network of surface water bodies within the Federal Way School District. The surface water bodies that are in the immediate vicinity of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. When necessary, the surface water regimes and flow patterns have been or will be researched and incorporated into the designs of the individual projects. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require work near the surface waters located within the Federal Way School District. Applicable local approval requirements have been or will be satisfied. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material Information with respect to the placement or removal of fill and dredge material as a component of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Any surface water withdrawals or diversions required in connection with the projects I included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project- specific environmental review when appropriate. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Each project included in the Capital Facilities Plan, if located in a floodplain area, will be required to meet applicable local regulations for flood areas. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters'? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge 8 , ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Specific information regarding the discharge of waste materials that may be required as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Please _see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Ground: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give Igeneral description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may impact groundwater resources. The impact of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on groundwater resources has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. The discharges of waste material that may take place in connection with the projects included in the Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. 1 Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may have storm water runoff consequences Specific information regarding the storm water impacts of each project has been or will be provided during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local storm water regulations. 9 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. =- - The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may result-in the-discharge of-waste-._ materials into ground or surface waters. The specific impacts of each project on ground and surface waters have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to all applicable regulations regarding the discharge of waste materials into ground and surface waters. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Specific measures to reduce or control runoff impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 4. Plants: a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup,bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation A variety of vegetative zones are located within the Federal Way School District. Inventories of the vegetation located on the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require the removal or alteration of vegetation The specific impacts on vegetation of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. The specific impacts to these species from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 10 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plans, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: 4 Measures to preserve or enhance vegetation at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local landscaping requirements. 5. Animals: a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. birds: hawk, heron,eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herrmg, shellfish, other: An inventory of species that have been observed on or near the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Inventories of threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. ' The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on migration routes have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: ' Appropriate measures to preserve or enhance wildlife have been or will be determined during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 11 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 6. Energy and Natural Resources: " «�-g 'r tVttat kinds-ofnergy(elric; natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used toneer#lam >.. completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The State Board of Education requires the completion of a life cycle cost analysis of all heating, lighting, and insulation systems before it will permit specific school projects to proceed The energy needs of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined at the time of specific engineering and site design planning when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe: The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on the solar potential of adjacent projects have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Energy conservation measures proposed in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be considered during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 7. Environmental Health: a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. ' 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: The projects included to the Capital Facilities Plan will comply with all current codes, standards, rules, and regulations. Individual projects have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review and local approval at the time they are developed ' when appropriate. 12 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. Noise: 1)= What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? A variety of noises from traffic, construction, residential, commercial and industrial areas exists within the Federal Way School District. The specific noise sources that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The District does not anticipate that the projects will create long-term increases in traffic- related or operations-related noise levels. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The projected noise impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated and mitigated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: ja. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? There are a variety of land uses within the Federal Way School District, including residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, utility, open space, recreational, etc. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. 1 The project sites covered under the Capital Facilities Plan have not been used recently for agriculture. c. Describe any structures on the site. The structures located on the proposed sites for the projects included in the Capital Facilities 1 Plan have been or will be identified and described during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. I13 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? The remodeling and renovation wwill-require-the idemolishment of whool-structures.The structures that will be demolished as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The sites that are covered under the Capital Facilities Plan have a variety of zoning classifications under the applicable zoning codes. Site-specific zoning information has been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Inventories of the comprehensive plan designations for the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be completed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Shoreline master program designations of the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Any environmentally sensitive areas located on the sites of the projects included in the Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? , The Federal Way School District currently serves approximately 22,400 students. The student population is expected to increase to 23,300 by the year 2010. The District employs approximately 3,100 people. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? ' Any displacement of people caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. However, it is not anticipated that the Capital Facilities Plan, or any of the projects contained therein, will displace any people 1 14 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Individual projects included in-tlfe`�pital Facilities Plan will be -subjectlri pffject-sp-CiM(fD environmental review and local approval when appropriate. Proposed mitigating measures will be proposed at that time, if necessary. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The compatibility of the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan with existing uses and plans has been or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive planning process and during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 9. Housing: a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. No housing units would be provided in connection with the completion of the projects included 1 in the Capital Facilities Plan. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. It is not anticipated that the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will eliminate any housing units. The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on existing housing have been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when 1 appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: ' Measures to reduce or control any housing impacts caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate 10. Aesthetics: ' a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building matenal(s)proposed? The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 15 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Appropriate measures to reduce or control the aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined on a project-specific basis when appropriate. 11. Light and Glare: a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Off-site sources of light or glare that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Proposed measures to mitigate light and glare impacts have been or wili be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 12. Recreation: a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are a variety of formal and informal recreational facilities within the Federal Way School District. 16 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. �-=The recreational impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been-orrwia- - RN be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, including proposed renovated school and support facilities, may enhance recreational opportunities and uses. I c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Adverse recreational effects of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to mitigation during project-specific environmental review when appropriate A school site usually provides recreational facilities to the community in the form of play fields and gymnasiums. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. There are no known places or objects listed on, or proposed for such registers on the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The existence of historic and cultural resources on or next to the sites has been or will be addressed in more detail during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. 1 An inventory of historical sites at or near the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed on a project-specific basis when appropriate. 14 Transportation: a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any The impact on public streets and highways of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 17 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The relationship between the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and public transit has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? An inventory of parking spaces located at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and the impacts of specific projects on parking availability has been or will be conducted during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The need for new streets or roads, or improvements to existing streets and roads has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Use of water, rail, or air transportation has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. , The traffic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The mitigation of traffic impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities t Plan has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 15. Public Services: a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The District does not anticipate that the projects identified in the Capital Facilities Plan will substantially increase the need for other public services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 18 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Remodeled/renovated school or facilities will be built with automatic security systems, fire alarms, smoke alarms, heat sensors; i`sprinkler systems. 16. Utilities: a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, and sanitary sewer utilities are available at the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan. The types of utilities available at specific project sites have been or will be addressed in more detail during project- specific environmental review when appropriate. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Utility revisions and construction needs have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. J Signatur • Date Submitted: April 26, 2005 19 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create temporary increases in the District's need for public services and utilities. Upon the completion of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, however, the District does not anticipate that its need for public services and utilities will increase substantially beyond existing levels. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: No measures to reduce or respond to such demands are proposed at this time. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The Capital Facilities Plan will not conflict with any laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. i ! t i 22 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT AVENUE TO EXCELLENCE June 23, 2005 D Charlene Anderson City of Kent 21 2005 220 Fourth Avenue South 30N - Kent, WA 98032-5895 p n-4 0 s ?�\Jt ss Dear Ms. Anderson, Enclosed you will find two(2)copies of the Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan for 2005 through 2011. The Plan has been prepared and adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors on April 25, 2005, in conformance with the Growth Management statutes of the State of Washington. Included in the Plan are the following: o Six-Year Enrollment Projections o Auburn School District Standard of Service ❑ The District's overall capacity of the 6-year period o An inventory of existing facilities ❑ Impact Fee Computations o District Capital Construction Plan The Auburn School District Board of Directors is requesting the plan be adopted by reference as part of the capital facilities element of the City of Kent's Comprehensive Plan. Please advise if additional information is required or needed. Thank you for your assistance. j 4Sincerely%ael Ne iate Su tendent Business and Operations Copy to: Linda Cowan, Superintendent, Auburn School District w/o enclosure Grace Yuan, Preston Gates& Ellis w/o enclosure Jeff Grose, Executive Director of Capital Projects w/o enclosure 915 Fourth Street NE,Aubum,WA 980024452 (253)931-4930 C."Maplatal Facilities Plan 2005-2011 �y s, :\'urtfncr.r;1 rrlril✓rnr ru! ('uurpuri r w1..Li-i■ rr "BaUding the Future" Adopted by the Auburn School Board of Directors ,. April 25, 2005 Auburn School District No. 408 - 915 4th Street NE, Auburn, WA 98002 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 408 915 Fourth Street NE Auburn, Washington 98002 f (253) 9314900 Serving Students in- Unincorporated King County Unincorporated Pierce County City of Auburn City of Algona City of Kent City of Pacific BOARD of DIRECTORS Janice Nelson Ray Vefik Carol Nelgerson Craig Schumaker Therald Leonard Linda S. Cowan, Superintendent I AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT "Avenue to Excellence" Table of Contents Section I Executive Summary ....................... Page 1 Section II Enrollment Projections.....................Page 6 Section III Standard of Service........................ Page 8 Section IV Inventory of Facilities.......................Page 15 Section V Pupil Capacity................................Page 18 Section VI Capital Construction Plan.................Page 20 Section VII Impact Fees.................................. Page 23 1 Section Vill Appendices................................... Page 27 Appendix A.1 -Student Enrollment Projections Page 28 Appendix A.2-Capital Facilities Plan Projections Page 42 Appendix A.3-Student Generation Survey Page 45 i Aubum School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2005 through 2011 r Section I Executive Summary j � I Aubum School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2005 through 2011 I. Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan') has been prepared by the Auburn School District (the "District") as the District's principal planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2005 This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and Pierce County and within the City of Aubum and City of Kent;the King County Council, the Pierce County Council, the City of Aubum and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction's respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of Algona and Pacific, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, the Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. The Plan establishes the District's"standard of service" in order to ascertain the I District's current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the Distnct The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the Distnct to define its standard of service based on the District's specific needs. In general, the District's current standard provides that class size for grades K-2 should not exceed 25 students; class size for grades 3-4 should not exceed 27 students; class size for grade 5 should not exceed 30 students. When averaged over the six elementary grades, this computes to 26.5 students per classroom. Class size for grades 6-12 should not exceed 30 students, with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers (See Section III for more specific information.) The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The District's 2004-05 capacity was 12,883 whereas Full Time Equivalent ("FTE") enrollment for this same period was 13,031.89. The actual number of individual students was 13,672 as of October 1, 2004. (See Section V for more specific information.) 2 The capital construction plan shown in Section VI addresses the additions to the District's existing facilities currently underway and provides for a new high school approved by the voters in February 2003 and the addition of two new elementary schools approved by the voters in February 2005. Also, the acquisition of a new middle school site and construction of a new middle school is needed to accommodate growth. The new facilities are required to meet the projected student population increase to be generated from the large development areas within the Auburn School District Two areas that have significant impact on the school district are the Lakeland South and the Lea Hill areas of the district. There are other pockets of development that impact the District as well. The Pierce County area includes most of the Lakeland South development and some adjacent undeveloped properties. The City of Kent has an area of approximately 158 acres that was sold to developers in 2004 The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, Pierce County,the City of Auburn and City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the fiscal impact incurred by a District experiencing growth and development. Section VII sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and mufti-family dwelling units The student generation factors have been generated using the students who actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and multi- family developments constructed in the last five years. The method of collecting the data is with the use of GIS mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County j GIS, and to integrate the mapping with student data from the District data system. This method gives the District actual student generation numbers for each grade span for identified developments This data is contained in Appendix A.3. I 1 I 3 Aubum Sshod DMtt No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2005 through 2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CHANGES FROM 2004 TO 2005 Listed below is a summary level outfine of the changes from the 2004 Capital Facilities Plan that are a part of the 2005 Plan. The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference. Section 1 Executive Summary A. Updated to reflect new information within the Plan. B. Summary level list of changes from previous year Enrollment Projections Updated projections. See Appendices A.1 &A.2. Standard of Service A. Increase in English as a Second Language program required 1 additional classroom at the high school level. B. Increase of 2 computer labs at high school level. C. Increase of 4 learning specialist classrooms at elementary level D. Increase of 1 early childhood classroom at elementary level �t Inventory of Facilides A. Updated to include Auburn Mountainview High School in inventory opening 2005. B. Updated to reflect addition of 3 relocatable units at Lee Hill Elementary School. and 2 relocatables units at Mt. Baker Middle School. Pupl�l Capacity tt A. Updated to include Auburn Mountainview High School in inventory opening 2005. 1� B. Updated to reflect addition of 3 relocatable units at Lea Hill Elementary School. and 2 relocatables units at Mt. Baker Middle School. 4 Aubum School Distrid No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006through 2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Section MI Impact Fees CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2004 to 2005 CPF CPF DATA ELEMENTS 2004 2005 EXPLANATION Student Generation Factors Single Family Consistent with King County Ordinance 11621, Elementary 0.2964 0.3216 Student Generation Factors are calculated Mid School 0.1353 0.1584 by the school district based on district Sr. High 0.1503 0.1632 records of average actual student generation Mutd-Family rates for new developments conshWed Elementary 0.0846 0.0687 over the last five years. Mid School 0.0455 0.0462 Sr. High 0.0533 0,0486 Boackh Index $129.81 $129.81 Updated to projected SPI schedule(G. Beck) Match% -State 54.19% 55 86% Updated to current SPI schedule. Match% -District 45.81% 44.14% Computed District Average AV Single Family $206,623 $218,805 Updated from February 2005 King County Dept of Assessments data. Multi-Family $52,994 $55,264 Updated from February 2005 King County i Dept of Assessments data using weighted average. Debt Sery Tax Rate $2.18 $2.49 Current Fiscal Year I GO Bond Int Rate 4.35% 4 63% Current Rate(Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-05) Section Appendices Appendix A.1 -Updated enrollment projections from October 1, 2004 Appendix A.2 - Updates enrollment projections with antapated buildout schedule. Appendix A.3-Student Generation Survey 5 Aubum School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2005 through 2011 i - Section II Enrollment Projections I� 6 Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006through 2011 ENROLLMENT PROJECMW = The Aubum School District uses a modified cohort survival model to project future enrollment for all of the Districts operations. Table 11.1 is an extract from the comprehensive projection model found in Appendix A.2 titled"CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections" This Table shows the anticipated enrollment for the next six years based on the previous 13 year history of the Distnct under the assumptions set forth In the comprehensive projections,Appendix A 1, and the projection for additwnal students generated from the Lakeland South and Lea Hill areas as shown in Appendix A.2 TABLE ASO ENROLLMENT 11.1 PROJECTIONS Oct 2004 ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROD PROJ GRADE 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 20I D-2011 KDG 892 917 936 936 944 952 961 1 960 976 992 1011 1011 1019 1027 2 992 994 1001 1016 1035 1035 1043 3 918 1042 1035 1041 1056 1075 1075 4 1016 968 1082 1074 1081 1096 1114 5 1 957 1062 1004 1118 1 1110 1116 1131 K-5 5735 5959 6051 6196 1 6236 6293 6352 6 1020 1004 1099 1040 1154 1146 1153 7 1124 1061 1035 1130 1071 1185 1177 8 1130 1165 1093 1066 1160 1102 1215 6-8 3274 3231 3227 3236 3385 3432 3545 9 1461 1560 1582 1509 1482 1576 1517 10 1261 1343 1430 1451 1378 1351 1445 11 1055 1153 1225 1311 1333 1259 1232 12 886 959 1048 1119 1206 1227 1154 9-12 4663 5014 5285 5391 1 5398 1 5414 5349 TOTALS 1 13572 1 14204 14563 14823 16020 16139 1 ti245 GRADES K-12 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 K-5 w/K @ 1/2 5289 5501 5583 5728 5764 5817 5871 &8 3274 3231 3227 3236 3385 3432 3545 9-12 4663 5014 5285 5391 5398 5414 5349 K-12 w/K 1/2 13226 13745 14095 14365 14548 14663 14765 7 Aubum School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2005 through 2011 Section III Standard of Service f� 8 Aubum School Dh1W No 400 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2005 through 2011 STANDARD OF SERVICE The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, Pierre County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent indicate that each school district must establish a "Standard of Service"in order to ascertain the overall capacity to house its projected student population. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage 'capacity'guidelines for computing state funding support. The fundamental purpose of the SPI guidelines is to provide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching funds for school construction projects. By default these guidelines have been used to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population. The SPI guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, facility configurations, emerging educational reform, or the dynamics of each student's educational program. The Auburn School District Standard of Service addresses those local considerations that require space in excess of the SPI guidelines The effect on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation pattern. Condhfions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without accompanying ` computations. ' OVERVIEW The Auburn School District operates twelve elementary schools housing 5,735 students in grades K through 5. The 867 of the 892 Kindergarten students attend 112 days throughout the year Grades 1 through 5, plus 25 kindergartners,attend on a full day basis. When converted to a full time equivalence the K-5 enrollment is 5,302. Four middle schools house 3,274 students in grades 6 through 8 The District operates two comprehensive senior high schools and one aftemative high school housing 4,663 students In grades 9 through 12. The District will open the fourth high school in the fall of 2005. CLASS SIZE The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the student population. Class sizes are subject to collective bargaining. Changes to class size agreements can have significant Impact on available space The current pupillteacher limit across all elementary programs Is an average of 26.5 students per teacher Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 26.5 students per room at grades K-5. At grades 6- 12 the limit is set at 30 pupils per room. The SPI space allocation for each grade articulation level, less the computed reduction for the Auburn School District Standard of Service, determines the District's capacity to house projected pupil populations. These reductions are shown below by grade articulation level. ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING AND BEHAVIOR AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATI01 The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses nine classrooms to provide for 80 students. The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPI space guidelines. No loss of capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to total elementary population. 9 Aubum School Diahict No.4W CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2D6 through Will STANDARD OF SERVICE SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities Fifteen standard classrooms are required to house this program.The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space guidelines by ten standard classrooms. The loss of capacity is expected as growth in program is larger than the total elementary population. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms C 26.5 each= (265) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (265) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the elementary level. One standard classroom Is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 26.5 each= (27) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (27) HEAD START The Auburn School District operates a Head Start program for approximately 118 youngsters in six sections of 112 day in length. The program is housed at Evergreen Heights Elementary School and utilizes three standard elementary classrooms and auxiliary office space. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. I Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 26.5 each= (80) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (a0) EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a pre-school program for young children with disabilities below age five. This program is housed at nine different elementary schools and currently uses nine standard classrooms.The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Ej Loss of Permanent Capacity 9 rooms(8126.5 each= (239) Lass of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms Q 26.5 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (239) i I ,o i . Aubum Sdwd District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2005 through 2011 STANDARD OF SERVICE READING LABS The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional language arts instruction These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces N available in each elementary school, Four elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available,thus they are housed in a standard classroom.The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 26.5 each= (106) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (106) MUSIC ROOMS The district elementary music programs require one acoustically modified classroom at each elementary school for music Instruction. The housing requirements are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 12 rooms @ 26.5 each= (318) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms C 26 5 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (318) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the elementary school level for students learning English as a second language This program requires twelve standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 12 rooms C 26.5 each= (318) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each= 0 Total Capacity loss (318) k SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for nine highly impacted elementary schools This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade level and do not receive other services. This program requires nine standard classrooms that are not provided for In the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 9 rooms @ 26 5 each= (239) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (239) ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a learning specialist program to increase literacy skills for first and second graders. This program model has been created from the 1-728 funds and currently has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms,as well as pulling out students into designated classrooms. The district is utilizing classrooms at all twelve elementary schools. Loss of Permanent Capacity 12 rooms @ 26 5 each= (318) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (318) 11 Aubum School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2005 through 2011 STANDARD OF SERVICE l MIDDLE SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates two structured learning classrooms at the middle school level for students with moderate disabilities. One developmentally disabled classroom for students with profound disabilities. The housing requirements for this program are provided in the SPI space allocations. ACCESS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District provides a transition program for students with behavioral disorders. The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses one classroom. The housing requirements for this program are provided in the SPI space allocations SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level. This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific disabilities. Three classrooms per school(twelve total) are required to provide for approximately 300 students. The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the SPI space guidelines MIDDLE SCHOOL COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates a minimum of one computer lab at each middle school.This program utilizes a standard classroom per middle school The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms Q 30 each= (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for students learning English as a second language. This program requires four standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines 1 Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms 30 each= (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 roans 30 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95%utilization of all available teaching stations. SPI Report#3 dated 11/09/04 identifies 151 teaching stations available in the midlevel facilities The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations ' Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each= (240) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (240) 12 l Aubum School Disbict No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2M through 2041 STANDARD OF SERVICE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS t SENIOR HIGH COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School Distnct operates two computer labs at each of the senior high schools This program utilizes two standard classrooms at comprehensive high schools and one at West Auburn. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 30 each= (210) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (210) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at both comprehensive high schools for students learning English as a second language This program requires five standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 30 each= (150) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms G 30 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (150) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates three structured learning center classrooms for 40 students with moderate to severe disabilities. The housing requirements for this program are provided in the SPI space guidelines. SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities. The current senior high school program requires sixteen classrooms to provide for approximately 420 students The SPI space guidelines provide for one of the sixteen teaching stations Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @ 30 each= (450) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (450) PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center The SPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity. This space was not intended for nor is it usable for classroom instruction. It was constructed to provide a community center for the performing arts. Using SPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet computes to 208 unhoused students or 8.33 classrooms. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 33 rooms @ 30 each= (250) t 13 Aubum School DisUict No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2005 through 2011 STANDARD OF SERVICE ROOM UTIUZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special Interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95%utiliization of all available teaching stations. SPI Report#3 dated 11109/04 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the senior high facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 15 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @ 30 each= (450) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (450) STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS ELEMENTARY Loss of Permanent Capacity= (1,908) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,908) MIDDLE SCHOOL Loss of Permanent Capacity= (480) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Taal Capacity Loss (480) SENIOR HIGH Loss of Permanent Capacity= (1,510) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,510) TOTAL Loss of Permanent Capacity= (3,898) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (3,898) l 14 Aubum School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2005 through 2011 Section IV Inventory of Facilities l 1 15 j ■ Aubm School olsblet No.408 ■ CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Boasthroaah 2011 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES Table IV.1 shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OPSI rated capacities. Table IV.2 shows the number and location of each portable unit by school. The district uses relocatable facilities to: I. provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting. 2. make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique student needs,and 3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim,stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on existing physical plants. Core facilities(i.e.gymnasiums,restrooms,kitchens,labs,lockers,libraries,etc.)are not of Isufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable classrooms. Table Permanent Facilities District School Facilities IV.] @ OSPI Rate Capacity (November 2004) Building Capacity Acres Address Elementary Schools Washington 553 5.40 20 E Street Northeast,Auburn WA,98002 Terminal Park 450 6.70 1101 D Street Southeast,Auburn WA 98002 Dick Scobee 618 10.50 1031 14th Street Northeast,Auburn WA 98W2 Pioneer 467 9.30 2301 M Street Southeast,Auburn WA,98002 Chinook 543 8.75 3502 Auburn Way South Auburn WA 98092 Lea Hill 516 10.00 30908 124th Avenue Southeast,Auburn WA 99092 Gildo Rey 596 10.00 1005 37th Street Southeast.Auburn WA 98W2 Evergreen Heights 512 8.09 5602 South 316th,Auburn WA 98001 Al 554 10.60 310 Milwaukee Boulevard North Pacific WA 98047 Lake View 667 16.40 16401 Southeast 318th Street,Auburn WA 98M Hazelwood 649 12.67 11815 Southeast 304th Street,Auburn WA 98M lialko 657 12.00 301 Oravetz Place Southeast,Auburn WA 98092 ELEM CAPACITY 6,781 Middle Schools Cascade 902 17.30 1015 24th Street North Auburn WA 99002 Ol is 970 17.40 1825 K Street South Auburn WA 98002 Rainier 916 26.33 30620 116th Avenue Southeac Auburn WA,98092 Mt.Baker 913 30.88 620 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA,98002 MS CAPACITY 3 74l Senior H Schools West Auburn 250 5 10 1401 West Main Slreet, Auburn WA 98001 Auburn Senior Hid 2,485 19.60 1800 Fourth StreetNortheas Aubum WA 98002 Auburn Riverside HS 1,503 33.00 501 Oravetz Road,Auburn WA 98092 Auburn Mountainview HS 11551 40.00 28900124 Ave SE Auburn,WA 98092 SH CAPACITY 5,729 TOTAL CAPACr" 1 I1 16 Auburn Schod D Id W 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2005 through 2011 INVENTORY OFFACIUTIES - TABLE I TEMPORARYIRELOCATABLE IV.2 FACILITIES INVENTORY March 200 Elemerta Location 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007.08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Temunal Park 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Did(SoDbee 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Pioneer 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Chinook 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Lea Hill 2 5 5 5 2 2 2 Gddo Rey 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Evergreen Heights 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Alpec 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Lake View 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Hazelwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ilalko 5 5 1 5 1 3 1 3 3 3 TOTAL UNITS 30 33 33 31 28 28 28 TOTAL CAPACITY 795 875 875 822 742 742 742 Middle School Location 2004-05 2006-06 2008-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 Cascade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Olympic 0 0 2 4 4 4 4 Ranier 5 5 5 8 8 8 8 Mt Baker 2 4 6 8 8 6 6 TOTAL UNITS 7 9 13 20 20 18 18 TOTAL CAPACITY 210 270 390 600 600 540 540 Sr High School Location 2004-05 200546 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 West Auburn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Auburn 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Auburn Riverside 15 10 10 10 10 10 10 Aubum Mountanvhew NA 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 27 22 22 22 22 22 22 TOTAL CAPACITY I 810 660 660 SW 660 660 660 COMBINED TOTAL UNITS 64 64 68 73 70 68 88 COMBINEDTOTALCAPACITY 1815 1,805 1,925 2082 2002 1,942 1,842 17 Aubum School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2005 through 2011 I Section V Pupil Capacity ,8 Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2000 tlimph 2011 PUPIL CAPACITY While the Auburn School District uses the SPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from which to determine space needs,the Dhstricfs educational program requires more space than that provided for under the formula. This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in Section III,Standard of Service The Districts capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional space to house its programs. Changes In the capacity of the district recognme new unfaruM facilities and the elimination of the facirly that formerly housed the Alternative Jr.High The combined effect of these adjustments is shown on Line B in Tables VA and V.2 below Table VA shows this Disticfs capacity with relocatable units included and Table V2 without these unds. Table VA Capacity WITH relocatabl" 2004-05 1 2005-M 2006.07 2007-08 200" 2009-10 2010-11 A. SPI Capadly 14,760 14,760 16,260 16,8W 17,460 17.460 18,260 A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elam 80o 600 11 A 2 SPI Capacity-New MS 1 800 A.3 SPI Capacity-New Sr. High 1,500 B. Capacity Adjustments 1870 ,133 2,130 1973 053 2,113 2,113 C. Net Capacity 12,890 14,127 14,730 15.487 15,407 16,147 16,147 D. ASD Enrollnment 13,672 14,204 14,563 14,823 15,020 16,139 15,245 E ASD Surpfu&Veflr4t (702) (77) 167 883 387 1,008 902 CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Exclude Alt JH (40) (�) (4 (4 (40) (40) (40) Include Relocatable 1,815 1,805 1,925 2,082 2,002 1,942 1,942 Exclude SOS 12 (3,6451 (3,898) 4,015 4 015 4 015 4 015 4 015 TobfAcpstmerlfs (f,870) (?,133) ($f30) (1,973) (2,053) ($113) (2,113) Table V.2 Capacity WITHOUT relocatables 2004-05 2005-06716,2W 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 A. SPI Capacity 14,760 14,760 16,860 17,460 17.460 18,260 A 1 SPI Capacity-New Elam 600 ]) A 2 SPI Capacity-New MS 800 A 3 SPI Capao"aw Sr High 1,500 B. Capacity Adjustments 3,685 3,938 4,055 4055 4,055 4 055 C Net Capacity 11,075 12,322 1 , 13,405 13,405 14,205 14.205 D. ASD Enrollment 13,672 14.204 14,563 14,823 15,020 15,139 15,245 E [ASD Supfus/Daflcit (2,597) (1,881) (1,758) (1,410) (1,615) (W (1,040) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Exdude At JH (40) (40) (40) (40) (40) (40) (40) 2/ Exclude SOS 12 3,645 3,898 4,015 4,015 4,015 4 015 4.015 TONI Ad)usfinerlts (3,a5) (3,938) (4,053) (4,055) (4,655) (4055) (i 055) 11 New facilities shown In 2009-10 are not funded under the current Capital Facilities Plan. 7(The Standard of Service represents 24 69%of SPI capacity When new facilities are added the Standard of Service computations are decreased to 20 26%of SPI capacity. 1/Students beyond the capacity are accomodated in non-classroom spaces(commons,library,theater) as well as rented space 19 Aubum School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2005 through 2011 Section VI Capital Construction Plan I 20 Aubum School Dli d No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2005through 2011 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN —� — The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974 with the formation of a community wide citizens committee The result of this committee's work was published in the document Idled'Guidelines for Development.' In 1985 the Board formed a second Ad Hoc citizens committee to pick up from the work of the first and address the needs of the District for subsequent years The work of this committee was published in the document titled 'Directions for the Nineties.' In 1995 the Board commissioned a third Ad Hoc citizens committee to make recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and physical facilities The committee recommendations are published in the document titled 'Education Into The Twenty-First Century--A Community Involved.' The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop plans for the implementation,funding, f and deployment of technology throughout the District's programs. The 1996 Bond proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate technological applications. The 1998 Capital Levy provided funding to further deploy technology at a level sufficient to support program requirements in every classroom and department In addition to the technology needs of the District the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District must prepare for continued student enrollment growth. As stated In their report, "the District must pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible" The Ad Hoc recommendation included commentary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent rates of assessment. A proposition was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that is providing $8,000,000 over six years to address some of the technology needs of the District;and$5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire school sites. During the 1997-98 school year a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Diennger School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population that will come from an area that includes a large development known as Lakeland South. Lakeland South is immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the Auburn School District. On June 16, 1998 the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Diennger Boards of Directors On June 22, 1998 the Auburn School Board adopted Resolution No.933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 23, 1998 the Diennger School Board adopted a companion Resolution No.24-97-98 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from Diennger to Auburn containing most of the Lakeland South development and certain other undeveloped properties. Development in this area is progressing at an aggressive rate In April of 2002, the Board formed a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two items and make recommendations to the board in the fall of 2002: a. A review of the conclusion and recommendations of 1985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees related to accommodating high school enrollment growth. This includes the review of possible financing plans for new facilities. b. Develop recommendations for accommodating high school enrollment growth for the next 10 years if a new senior high school is not built. This committee recommended the board place the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in February 2003. The February election approved the new high school at 68.71%yes votes. The school is currently under construction and will open in the Fall of 2005. 21 Auburn school District No.40a CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2005 through 2011 -- CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN In the Fall of 2003 the school board directed the administration to begin the planning and design for Elementary#13 and Elementary#14. In the fall of 2004,the Auburn School Board passed resolution #1054 to place on the ballot in February 2005 two elementary schools(Elementary#13 and Elementary#14). The voters approved the ballot measure in February at 64 72% Elementary#13 will be built in the Lakeland area on a 12 acre site the district owns. Elementary#13 is scheduled to open in the Fall of 2006. Elementary 014, scheduled to open in the Fall of 2007,will be constructed on a 10 acre site the district owns in the Lea Hill area. The District is projecting an additional 1790 students within the six year period including the Lakeland and Lea Hill areas. This increase in student population will require the construction of two new elementary schools, and the acquisition of a new middle school site and construction of a middle school during the six year window. Based upon the District's capacity data and enrollment projections,as well as the student generation data included in Appendix A.3,the District has determined that approximately eighty-one percent of the capacity improvements are necessary to serve the students generated from new development,with the remaining additional capacity required to address existing need. The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years. The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population 2004-11 Capital Construction Plan March 2006 Funded Projected Fund Project Timelines Project as of cost Source Mar-05 04-05 05-06 06-07 1 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 All Facilities- 1998 Technology Yes $8,000,000 6Year XX Modemization Cap Levy AN Facilities- 2006 Technology Yes $12,000,000 6Year XX XX XX XX XX XX Modernization Cap Levy Impact Portables Yes $700,000 Fees XX XX XX XX 11 rope ur se New Middle Yes $5,000,000 XX XX School Bond 1/ Elementary#13 Yes $15,600,000 Impact XX XX XX Fees const const open Bond 1/ Elementary#14 Yes $15,600,000 Impact XX XX XX XX Fees an const const open 1/ Middle School#5 No $30,000.000 XX XX XX XX plan const const open Bond 1/ New Sr. High Yes $58,500,000 Impact XX XX Fees const open J/These funds may be secured through local bond issues,sale of real property,impact fees,and state matching funds The District currently is not eligible for state assistance at the elementary school level 22 Aubum School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2005 through 2011 Section V11 Impact Fees 23 ♦ r LL 00 O M ? WCD CAF N?@q O O yp IL a0 10 , a soN N CO N h tO ep U M N N P. U � N M N ! N N J 4 J J M M f N N N N N N N r p8 ry yq ♦ p 8 j yQ O a f 47 LLIL O �f N N !q N N N N y N � NNN C I� N 40 h N A N E N o 0ci y 0 � 0 COL 4 o 0 0 o 0 LL LL LL LL LL c �$p Z g g C E E LL 0 0 W o o00 0 �j � 000 000 Wto w w N E Q IL 8 LL LL LL N N M Mga � toco 'sa @ g- sam SEE $$ < LL a 000c 0 0� r o0O � v� LL x X fu S x N p QL�1 oo LL p LL �mmmqy pp pp p a to V G N N ~ 9 wo N ag 8 GI N N M M O LL O N Yd x LL .fit N h pp ru anxm M 1A LL N N N N O x U C LLOIL o� aLL$o �i �' maa 4 `ems E r LL � E t E� L B Ji a € N 4 = m b = W lL W '� fZ li W N li W y LL W 2 fQ Auburn School DisW No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006thsough 2011 V. TAX CREDIT PER RESIDENCE Formula: Expressed as the present value of an annuity TC=PV(tr*mt rate,dscount perlod average asad value x tax rate) Ave Redd Cur Dbt Sery Bnd Byr Indx Numb of Tax Credit Tax Credit Asad Value Tax Rate Ann Ind Rate Years Sfn F Mtn Fam Single Family $210,805 $2.49 4 63% 10 $4,283.62 MuPo Family $55.264 $2 49 4 63% 10 f1,0H 92 t VI. DEVELOPER PROVIDED FACILITY CREDIT Formula. (Value of Site or FadlylNumber of dwelling units) Value No of Unds Facil CredA Single Family $0 00 1 $0.00 Muni Family $0.00 1 50.00 FEE PER UNIT IMPACT FEES RECAP Single Mum SUMMARY Faml Family SRO Costs $726 31 $211.84 Permanent Facility Const Costs $10.319 52 $5,091 67 Temporary Facility Costs $34.76 $7.43 State Match Credit ($4,434.25) ($1,156 42) Tax Credit $4,283 62 1,081 92 FEE(No Discount) $11,362 73 $3.072 60 FEE(50%Discount) $5.681 38 $1.536 30 Fadity Credit $0.00 $0.00 Not FaeObl on r $5,8d1.36 51,538.30 Z 25 8 lh f Vl h fD N O Y `T f m U) W O 00 O "tN 0 o N m N Nf M N ' N N N J LL ftL/}J Q p N m S CDa $ M �O p N go O , N N apg O M f Q J O g M M N N f N a N N gg E n m ,n Ni= CIAIt W Y $ � chi � N � v�' oc M o a ♦ m yo p eSp N y� N •� CD act IUL) J _ CCC cco � N co QIn en enq � pp f � W N Z m 0 N ' h ^ o 0 ' N h N N f QU. a m N N N GC N d _ J at o Go*Im p O N h O IA N S 88 O I �` N C LL N N p N O N A N O N O Ol m f t�'f Q N O yPj N N co J W GoYNf » N a 7 � M Q V ,,, in rv:inv v; r� o LL LL ui $ g g o in x a _ n LL Q N o �_ W `oLL d g {Y E L N E lY to to 2 F gg C LL a LL � yn N Y •_.. LLcgg60 a d mHvais � o a E y E E E F o ❑ m o � S E 0 Q 2 e c Qu� wf a m ¢ vai � via` � LLI. A g E $ a � ' LL LL E $ d XX� @ � a a- dim° V J � sa E E € E 8 0 �' 8 0 a v� F U) vai O is Li to Aubum School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan , 2005 through 2011 Section VIII Appendix - Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey 27 I APPe ndix A.i -Student Enrollment Projections I 28 Auburn School District #408 ' Student Enrollment Projections ' October 2004 Introduction The projective techniques give some consideration to historical and current data as a ' basis for forecasting the future. In addition,the `projector' must make certain assumptions about the operant variables within the data being used. These assumptions are"judgmental"by definition. Forecasting can be defined as the extrapolation or logical ' extension from history to the future, or from the known to the unknown. The attached tabular data reviews the history of student enrollment,sets out some quantitative assumptions, and provides projections based on these numerical factors. ' The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, psychological, economic,and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection. ' The logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today,and will be in the future. It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over thirteen years and six years respectively. The results provide a trend,which reflects a long(13-year)and a short(6-year)base from which to extrapolate. Two methods of estimating the number of kindergarten students have been used. The ' first uses the average increase or decrease over the past 13 and 6-year time frame and adds it to each succeeding year. The second derives what the average percentage Auburn ' kindergartners have been of the live births in King County for the past 5 years and uses this to project the subsequent four years. The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after ' the fact. This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections. Monitoring deviation is ' critical to the viability and credibility of the projections derived by these techniques. Tables Table I— Thirteen Year History of October 1 Enrollments—page 3 The data shown in this table is the baseline information used to project future enrollment. This data shows the past record of enrollment in the district on October 1 of each year. Table 2—Historical Factors Used in Proiections-page 4 This table shows the three basic factors derived from the data in Table 1. These factors have been used in the subsequent projections. The three factors are: ' 1. Factor 1—Average Pupil Change Between Grade Levels This factor is sometimes referred to as the"holding power"or "cohort survival." It is a measure of the number of pupils gained or lost as they move ' from one grade level to the next. i 29 ' 2. Factor 2 -Average Pupil Change by Grade Level This factor is the average change at each grade level over the 13 or 6-year period. ' 3. Factor 3—Auburn School District Kindergarten Enrollment as a Function of King County Live Births. This factor calculates what percent each kindergarten class was of the King County live births in the 5 previous years. From this information has been extrapolated the kindergarten pupils expected for the next 4 years. Table 3—Protection Models—pages 5-13 This set of tables utilizes the above mentioned variables and generates several projections. The models are explained briefly below. a Table 3.13 (pg 5)—shows a projection based on the 13-year average gain in kindergarten(Factor 2)and the 13-year average change between grade levels (Factor 1). The data is shown for the district as a whole. u Table 3.6 (pg 5)—shows a projection using the same scheme as Table 3.13 except it shortens the historical to only the most recent 6 years. ' o Table 3.13A and 3.6A(pg 6)—uses the same factors above except Factor 3 is substituted for Factor 2. The kindergarten rates are derived from the King ' County live births instead of the average gain. o Tables 3E.13, 3E.6, 3E.13A, 3E.6A(pg 7)—breaks out the K-5 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. a Tables 3MS.13, 3MS.6, 3MS.13A, 3MS.6A(pg 8)—breaks out the 6-8 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. o Tables 3SH.13, 3SH.6, 3SH.13A, 3SHAA (pg 9)—breaks out the 9-12 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. u Table 4(pg 10)—Collects the four projection models by grade group for ease of comparison. o Table 5 (pgs 11-13)—shows how well each projection model performed when 1 compared with actual enrollments. Data is provided in both number and percent formats for the past 13 years. 30 N m N M W O N N ' Y m A M h m N N M N M ♦ M M pp f A p ypp .p N , V 4 rn O w ss M Q !1` NO f N N tM'! f N m O W N N e Sp t7 O a o o a d W w W W t'^f o f cq f s $ - Q N �Yp imp W ��Mpp S W N fOV W O aD W 1`O Cw O S ` O N .� NW) m N 40 � N m C�73 qN m ^ w w w ^ M W h Imp Np m f aD O N M N N lN'f 10�1 CO OD �O�yy w wp ' Wp W O+ W W .N- o S ' O ; ' N m N N f rW0 N �w M f tll as {N�( p a W M m N N Ow0 N n O l"! S S C O r W O 1R O A OWD A N N w pp O N pp ' m M G w H h S 109 N h N m M M Z !W ��N0pp1 N S ^ mm EpNp im W 40 OD pl'1 f 10+1 w ' �• N U' r IL �mp WW W m m M ' O m b w m N N A N r p N f !rD No I.- W 10 9 s S O W W ^ O O m ^ N M O W l+J M, t0 [') Y OOm�� N M f N 0 pp = pry .j�, a7 a CP It p �p n fMO Q r P Ow0 W m S �y � 1�! " m w A P a � M A W W W W r, N m r� N N m N f Yf m m h �j ��Oyy Y mMm i�mpp ^ p1p� imp M � �` ^ � r�rm� P � N mN N Oml N M O Nm 123 W W W W W O! W W m O aD ti ^ i+f S W lm`I N f0 f rl! N N t9 NN Q W 1hf� {p fqDco Q pW ae a' tppp Wp �(p� fp m ' S W W Ol Ol W W N W W W m m N ; r N N (p � Y N OD N N mm ��pp pppp w a Q 7E�5 �$1 �O ♦ o (p N Ol CD W W W m W CD 01 A f0 ^ N S ^' qp m t� rff m aMD n N q♦ , U N Yf N h N w N M N _ pNp m W p W m W m m aD 1� 1� C W N r440!! N r m N N t^'1 N rnm N 00 Pi L L 1 o QL m W < xxx � xxxxxxxZ� xxxxxx � xx � xx �e � xxam^ xxxxx� C* Nt� N npp M S S t� N f r m teaDpp N p m O 14") {'1 {Pmp! n N S N YO a00 ' M 0 aa* O z h m f to Y N m f n A aD N O) aD C) t�i tV Cp t0 S m m o A n m m O a g FF y Y WS Q a+j m M f f f Y f f Y Y Y Y �T f Y Y Y Y m 0 W f v) n M ad < f f as 0 m Z W 7 o oi = Z < �� aW zm N JJ V Z J N NO 42pQ mmtl CON m m Fr OOF ng Im N Vn N N O • WP m O N n F S a S O f0 N m N m r S N M N t i 10 F 1lf O N q Oy P A W Y Z m m n w ao ttOO n m fWWP F n CD f� w m Co m m m 000111 s m o m ai a 43 .` .o ti 'goo d W ' W to 0 n m ao Y n a0 O m O m A O t9 N Y N a0 V1 O a) m 01 F Na� R7 n F f N 0 }� 0 N WQ = CJ N �-- tC �[] f H lO V m �t� O fY t0 CD % a0 m O t7 n 01 10 B O A f0 = O V O o N f m tD A a0 a0 Oi Oi aD Y O NN�t f N N N Na� N N C VJ 2 Z J m ` ~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N A = Y Y O H LL J n n m m N a+l n efe geg Zee W P5 oy F n � Fr- a3 aDom � o � o 000� m m mama$ 90 00 o `So O •yG {0�p imp pp p 8 N p % p p p p J {L N f f Y! N C t0 m0 1� N ^ lh 1f/ m 0 O h ,& m t�f m CD N w 1D co K h t. m m .o n f Y f Y f Y n n taf n ® tD m t0 m F A eo aD F to F A aD r A A A F F h A WL 10 F r o7 n m O N a�Z lO S pq n aO ONW) a� Go Ep O mN Etr)E O I flR aOo wrA m Nm YqP) m co IGO ' 7 m Cc* 1 ao ao 0) Oi m ' .N- aa) n s en- s r ~ z 6 ,..� O m m m /') N tp f �p +� N Y a0 ' Pi n m pp m n a') N A n oo M lh tp N m t0 a7 S N S S t+l n n 0 n f S mO P) N O F O q r Y!W Wy F- f �? f Y P m O n aD _ aD n at � 01 �act O n {r{pp NFt� pbp �qty aO O % �Ny O �fy I �fayy W D 40 m N m .�- r m r O eao- N N N N N N N aV N N N N N NNN N S O N Pm f n m aD m O lH P) M� C� P- m O m $ N m f W m A m O O O O 01 F n f� = F r O �a 01 pp Qg1 m ,Q o 0 0 ao O m m m m m m W W m OaOa m m aaDo S m m 'a m m m m 0) N N N N ' � W V J o 0 0 0 o p p O 0 0 0 o a o p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Y t0 Y h S S f coo mH aD a0 O ♦ m N a0 N a0 m N OD ao aD W ap taj p m ' n O C N Yf q W aD N f v O to A N l'f N N fo t2f IV v [vV N� •' N a') Y n m f` a0 m ' •N- Y N N Y n tD r m O) m o) to Y E N t7 f n t0 F eD m � Y � aD C ' S U 91 Y $(h mm C) N O aD ICT, n O a0 n A n a0 O m r N ^ Cl) n 1'- n of N aD N m Y n O m A O n to m > n N O N O m m m 0 N m N aD M a o m M N n A N m o ro n ad F o Y ai mad tai OW n I N `.C O O � @g O W N N f' v) N , g �£ 0 M N N a+) f n 10 F ao W N Y •' N tat f n 0 A w GD o N 05. Of f Li � EEEE8EEE89o � ' g � LL ,, III Y N t'1 f to ao n eo m " LL LL 'a a� (p 7 N N � qp N w n N o t'! O 10 m 0 A r e�p qp a00 tmmp O ��O N w m N K A � 0 W mm tQf nl M K A O 0 0 0 O O f T O Y r a r a w ^ r o a r r o w -. n ' � 0 � oaaoossNsaam N 10 � zis ma � a+ � $ � omom � �5 r o V �y 10 N O O �Wp �NNNNy ^ n ����ppyy �6�qpp W ` �.nj N Q t0 N N Y Mf Ywf O ��Npp ♦Nr 00 N daD W a W m m W r O Cf O N a M 0 0 o 0 0 0 O f A ' O f O Y O r f M 1ff ^ p fw0 < W t0 O f W A f N tn0 '�f YOf Nq l0 m N A 0 �qp C ♦ �p O N W d ter iA0 Nm m CP w O ^ Ol l� v f' a lr'� O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ^ o N r r r f O p {p r M A m N r m 8 $ In ^ � r N ' nNM � u� o t- F- daccooma � W a � 0 � � r ,NMOM aa � o $ ' o � � � � W N m a0 q ^ n w Y x^ C7 O W m m M u> n N f th 0 m m a0 �Op �p A 6 ry ^ Y iq A N N O g 8 r N P1 Of Yf A N t0 ro n H a r co W m w 00 Op m m (h C a m r w r 0 0 0 0 O m A Y m ' ♦tqpp r o Z a a m m Q 0 o N N 0 0 0 aLU a m m 0 0 0 0 M O O O (O+1 M v m n P1 ON w /7 nM N �ey0 AN r eCC�pp On 10 co d W w o N , a. �{ aD t9 Ip (O m r CM4 ^ N a a0 m r m r ^ r N ILoP w m Ol m w zJn m m mf on1O � m an n w w to v� o� aC v � oa°Do `m� � � � W a � � � � cAio � oa � a Am galo � ' s 5 aMOY = a �p Z (� n n m 0 g N m M N A O aD N M n M M tm0 m f (/J Q3 �p a m �p 2 d O a0 Oi m0 m r .M- O a^ o Z ap a O d0 M N 0 In N O ^aQco 'R W g Cl) ^ O f w N W M A OO r N v ^ m Vol ' $ n a0 10 m e O M M l7 ^ N N �. W r CD 0 r. r M r `"' {A7 G ~ Y d o W m O W O W O r b ^ r 0 Y a r rr r r n JA AC N Q to 19 O � N 3 M (O m 0 co �np r O m Ol N a0 f'f p — y U aw0 01 4m m 0 (m ^ .f- ly p r r w w m a m r N M f of m A m m r a , FO Q Y F ,V F 1 1 a .- (p ACODM O NNNO a n W 1 A ^ O 1 A A a0 N 0 A o N W CO IL g � IL , 0: a d - a Ta 1 O N O 7 , g d a s g'm p o d Z 1 F V a' i+l W W O n N ' t7S 8 ' N ^ lu CL a O 1 � �An O mAo � 'Ono g $ x M gg a ? a ? $ °$ ooao3 � O N b M Iff A N f C7 �;�ppQ 1 J a O W W o W d A A co 0 0 W O (p W W W Z �° N : CD a � WM W CL LU 1 a = WWY I'/ wPC4 00 y CL CD iL 1a�rL pp � Ogg ��pp ��(CyyOO gipp? Cp !1�� (� a a0 O m OI O O N N N m W a o O m m o ^ IQ e O J _ g� r pp aooW � wm°� oo W � � � :° o W apm � A �gWE # W _ ya g $ } � od � a�eamd '� 1 � � 'Nn m Q •6 Qtl � o 1 ~ � S W �X a y. a � 01 f �p O N O O '- � � t♦p �` A O � Oo � O � M A � ^ tp+f � M 0 � � p CD Ol m OO W W M O a a 1 J £g C Lt, J Cq 7 W N N !�! t0 t0 YO'f N U' Y a n p N C7 F W Ol O) Y ' p ��pp �Ap K N C Op tV CO O A N N f�f CO t0 A S2 C.1 p O CD l'f O V CWO Oi 01 0 0 O A) s O a 9L o < 'ca W W O W W J d QqY ^ NMf In CD A eO W � � � Oa Q � �3 � Nc0f � CDAO W � � Fa �l F- H Ix 5 1 �N bYOW b Epp�Op aD a0 f b f O A A b W OND�W W N A O'' Fz AbNCDA O A {'f O,NN W A A• �N a � �. m O CO b0 W O b �j�Np NO�p m z b W Q W M 00000 ,N YES s O bCh YPi Wb a, f �wm Am • W '7 CL O a m�mW ♦ Ao�oo .,NO e. �` o� W , N OW H cm' O I O N OWw f A a� � W000 mmcc � , Z M W N ' mOOlA bNN WNimA LU O N N M W�-NOW O b�W bl9 'O NW QoW m N G �m000 N C PON CD W�t01CC** .f mom W $ W rp f�pp ! �p�p ♦W♦p� G O�o�OfQ W b W m� r0 C 0�01 W m mm0)� Y /oJ� toy! cp x _ ' C W m�� .1W7 W��� aN0 W �Q� N a W�" m � It ISO 0 cc =Li �p �OOO{�pp NN P x IG���ISO 0 $ �Ol0 0 f0 WO O �f f0 d5 ia c c C C CC C C ' bO �OOpI WN DDCIO O Q ONeOto A W O b � (7 ry1b (7 , O b O�p NOm� O ( O) Ommo,W O OQ W C) IQ CA) m a ww 9 LU V b m am —CL LLJ �Nin b w Nm ltb mv 0 w �-NO3f0 S 1 am awC4 a = m � m0 � am Om 0 a N C � ' o 0 o N m N K K n a N D a M a CL Ix O ` Ol O r. O O N m 1 N O 1 r' �ppp m M d CL �- p K y) O! t7 A W N A C' � O O O �ONy T O O pp� N m V9 A JL � N G a pf m Y� 01 Om! d O O O Y 0 OnAamm � O � NON °N° N zit O � nmS XM Oufo � M a CL 3 m a m a a 3 o S 8 m �v a ' m a ao o a s o o o r2 r O ~ NQ w d `� O at� 000cq co n. OMti opal {7N O � .Npp pM u� S OMSBa � � O � onu' aaa�{pppppx co CL a W O O N n N a !� O O In � a O O O N O M 2' f� 00 N Z d d O v !w 2e M of A gn 3E ' N N N j W S o S o o S g o S K - o_ - o N a � � Mv ate . m {�� n a � e+ � a � FZ W f x O N O O a 0 Ol aomomg+ � � a0000 � m ,°� Como mine � 3I Z L �., � IL w G N g W m m S M OR 3 0 o m S x d O1 .. ao .- � u+ Me, agS � M, SS CL U N a o o o m m m a B o B m N g a In a m W $ eftO in � N O_ Q � O ap � � mQ mNap � 3�E, $ O� m mqn Ix M0W)a W Z _ Tpa rcera Z = V Zm p go 0 f � po� � pa a O F .M�p —a� Zrpop �p py� 2?N r � ea a us Ix �f0 CL IL ' � p � a J = LLO mgp pJ N m � I � O 0 O � p °' � O � O lA9 co( � ^ U � Um .ggE C N c J tcg t c� N m J c C QaOe [Qf � � C7 OQNt4inC7 C7� i o w oj om L) Cl) �UmO oN �N pt4 A'� Cf7� c $ a' m' nm a a Q d e ppa ee M m w w Oa d mAm co� mro a w m n N ao fpp m m m ems' '+ w ♦ m m '� m m m m m O ' a. A N W d a Y o a f o a Q 0 DANmo � � wAwmMX � Anmo o � nNmmmmWaof � ' mW 0 ''N� a m f N 0 ' N Q K to ' m ' m cW'1 �- O ' a '. W O -� d N m p N N m p WW x to N N w O �- S O e� N ti M 1P �o? a m N ' w O v a h Y N O m o .N,.. a N ` O N CL V o m M �m r �0 O M W A m NmO � m W � M _ m b a .N- ► O Y m a N .'- O Y a ` ' O Y Z a F ' m � 7mr �o'i a � � A �NpO � O ' mOYmYA1�� a � m ` m N a : f O Q IL .- 01 Y p .N_. a ' w f .Y,. a "Z Y ' Of o G p aY (i�� p aMaDV) N MM 0M � � $ mNp aNeDl7 �! aN � MEON f- a a ' ' ' `� C M a s ' O of a a N N O O A M a t'l O Z o a LU r ► A 3` N Y M YI ys� N r Cmp (xp N N Y m N JM ^ W `d' R' ^ aN0 0 K '�' l�f M O A N m N O O y � � .- mmn♦ Y oM a � � `ro ate •' AfYpo d � '� � � M v W O N 7 m t7 m N m O Ir Np amD M O N Q m eD N O O imp M �eyp �p �p M F � O " O O Y m - w a P! Pf O O O w O N ' 0 0 ' �O O M ^ 0 0 Z a a a . v a r 0 �' 0 Or m m N n M o O te n ♦ B O A Ifl N O N h l") O A ' �- Yf 0P O N NlV N � � v ' � WN �o � m � A �nC CL QQN � wCM ro m N N Y W a m N N O M p '� mm N N f m OS N M N ' m f O Q ED ' ' O Wm O % g M N N N g 0 O ab t�f D Of w N N .N-- ` f N t�l C K N ' N I m Nh- M a 0 v v a 0 ^ Q a 0 t f ... CL Or- 0 v .. ♦ 1p �� y G e- o OO. mmmo O Q °Dnoflff on s $gg 0d Qo N m. N r in N= O 'aa o n p W ♦ M r s - � n M Y1 m m e $ n p m M A Y � �` M m pp m de , 7' ap M$ -M^ 'm Yl W OQNmmmN W h > a S N WOQNtD 10miH p� �O N rK 'd Y H Y 10 Z bao v� �i = ao m 1 � n m V ? m p Np O m ni 3♦� m W = w p n N N O �' W m p Np O m m 2fe W m o w a l " ^ M m O N R' ' l9 ` imp m N 0 n C! ` f O N 0 � ^ ^ p emepp t0 nF a 0 Q N ia. m a 0 f a a m d CL ♦ N sr ri S J C sr S C J sr C = •s J C _C � Qm �p mp � am1p m M 10 C7 oQm N �Q m f0 C7 ¢ '� _ ' f N O m O = f T co O is m O = N O ^' C� C7 = aO m oa� V O � m `oa� U � � °o g`opa U � rNoio 0 3 N aw r 2N < F- ?j Ly < F- � . ya Q F m = e� moN � a W = O o � N � dc ��p 0 o ^ NPa min o � NLLI � Lam' Ka N Q y m a = m < _ m t mw lam m � m � mmp � m �, CD � N ^ Y Y Y YIL Kw a N Ir a A a � a ^ a . NP! Q .- Y a � N n amoN a � � s a - � 0 ^mpp am N avZnY � CL CL d � Y `vY f a � 1 1 nopem 'p � Yn au) mn Nm ^ mm_ �oy mr ' d 1 2 m R "^f 4n 1 aN' m NN d r f Z a � � � C, Nle CL n a � W o `� o $ d � fin 0NN A § a It a `� » "n � O m Oa -lM � 2 e� a`g O1»? NN�!'CL IL a= Nn ul J o a J n n 0 a � mm CL IL IL (q eom (L vvY w CL W ^ ^ O ^ � o O � � uTi O ^ � Sallo M I- K a � a : v�i a s 6 , M K3 r. mn Z a a0 a a a YYY a •- C m000 oAymr � o mo� pm� -' omtn2Vn o n • O m g 1� O a' 9 O O O O O - m N m a ` � ca fA ao a YY aonftnavvl a Y � CL � ^ ! ~ p 0 os Nmeo 0 � 0 pm rn YnNa pg � �my �np ^ Oa3 � i. m O `ip� � � � OotNpON $ CK y 1 G m 01 m a 0 Y Y Y Y d tqf yr m Pl a a Y O Y1 � f d J �f W ^ '� m W ' m Y O! Y m 0 m m B m g 0 c0 -e O N 02o � r ^ Oa, niinw Onao ^ao OQRg �ng OQ= ao^ mwmm aoYY � Y doNoNcs aovoi �n Sim ao zm _ O O ^ aD aD omoi- O m - .nn O �IL o n n CD IL CL m a. 08 o Onanw OaNn cni cNi � a � om aog� o � � 'W` � 2p ao � w � � ao � v � aoeo .� �na� ao � Y � i 0. ow LU Q0 Q' Z p m Y r N a n v n A pp3� m t'f l7 l7 J KY ~ UoaO1ommo pU � � OU � nn � pV 0 � CU t�i cmi nt�i W a' I w I w I w W ^ Q .N- ¢d Q `m¢.. Y 2 - m ro � m a6 mvi uS fn z � = 2x = - m � 2 ui uiw lu 0 ww ww C9 Ntn to to i qy xxxx x x x i 0 0 � 0 � � •' � O O O O 0 0 0 0 mS YXYX W �5 xx �0000 gg OO F m m m eo m p N N N N N Q N N N N N �O N_ m$ `�pe x `9x �p xxxx x3ex �' 3e Z9e a` t0 f PN 0 1 f� x m N N re N x a�0 N m aD , 0 C_ �5 o a Rbmm ° w5 S2 � on " ui � o p N N W W f f �- W O N N pia m m e G �j °m N � � m � $ g 0ha0j5 w $ n 0 N P o O m N N N NNN N N N N W � 7Z b ,fib 43 oc > } } > xxxx x x x xxxx m C*x � � : o m K m ' CO W Wco oo `q�7' � o � � � � aoo a°0ea`�o0 N N N N N I- N N N NA F ' .r.. Z araaara W � xxxx x `e �� xae � x a4xxx F- S� Nmnao x ♦ oYo x o o x oN � m M �cpp xxam ♦ vi 0 � •- � pip O to a .r..N .-.N m X N O N m W U A CO'f aD O e J C Hew n N n N W N W n m m N W 8 f9 � n pmp MWm Wmle D ♦ A U O t♦p N N N N O n n n n n <O m n aZ F 10 m m tom 1� N N N N N F� N N N N N F' _. LO) O C; O G O O m N m N O O O O a �O m U W I C N X m N N SL N v N N u 0 0 0 N X O m N U C7 E c o S 00 o »ffCCCC N U 7Tii n n YYff WW G % �- to a '. W z a n O r amY a. x F m nnnD H m ♦ DNNN N rz N N F N N N N N F r o a t aa a W LLl LL! W W W W W W 7 W W W W — W W W W , mN mornFe� � � M F- man rf c* Q V 'CC C U C'CC oU rr C.� 'crs �- Y < ao as c9n an as < �o as 0q naaa � a4a^a� a" aKaQa a4aRae � a�a' ae � umiomna Q e non 4C3 W mrn `� m N N 1O 1 NP1Onn NnNnN Gof Of O f0 OAS p a0 ♦ N N O F F F H s iE X♦ ♦� 2mR 3e 3me at +` 1n7. P 1f1 1A 1A SE N N LL] N M N Z m N z Epp Q ¢ ¢ r A jWow ^ A a I a � O N N N N N l'f U 2t Eat0 E ax aR 2E aeX a O �pOQ � f = ��$5NmN ��$5 N v Nd n• Opt+! Q n n y N 1- PI N `N—U aa ' m wm aw _ non O of a°3im `� W t3 Q n n n n O p O N m N O W p W m (d O m ID m m C PI N e4f a� t+f rf M t�l 0 M � a�1 to Pl n H F H H •- •- Z rcrr W aaaa e � aezit xZRe9 3?zle A �S aR x X N ' m �O $C a rompWp �Ot m^ W o a> 000 so m n to m m cm M 0 P M aA N HOa OOm •- VJ CC c 2R tipe 2R 2e ixE XiR X 2R ffC � O: TO X Ol r n 2E A vl ti b ^� M m P O j O O v N N N N �- m V ppZ t 9 a ES d t5 ame t5 m t5 U W E 00 _ IWO �O N O c _ M h h h h C4 M CWD r m N m yp m pp IL }m M fm0 t0 °aS m aD M N N N N 1 N N N N N gIM N G � Q t Q � � � S � N I yyy � �- - t6 L Y 7 W W W LLI m M W W W W 3� 7 W W W W J m CY m F- M co ell SG F-. w w w w F w w M M U rr'c ' U 'ccc oU crcc U 'c-oc H C7Y ¢ aaaa O �` ¢ aaaa (9 � aaaa aC9 ¢ aaaa .ffi N C a Cm a?aea�a? � aeX a= e ae � a� X �O yppp K aC O O N O A n A de N m N m In lA to It !!! N z m m a O O O O Q Q M N f N Q O O O O F V Y,G O % .Y...'-.. .~..N ❑ Q tp0� b G Go N 400 O N N N W IC a a' � r � s a° aex xatagx ae ae � � azX a o000 VM x � ,� F-� yN � o oc m �o Ms G fi N N m 8 rs r % N m 'QQ m N N tvpp 1pp N ♦ �({ypy N (p ap m Z � ' CD n A n N M l7 C14, A P A {'1 t+� A to m W m en m m m m m M M Z Vf M M M W d a a a Xo at 4t ;e � � jf aEaeaEe H aE Q Pi N m �` R Cl) a �i• ` A M A M a` Q f A m a C CtmC S C r v h p 0 v N N g m a�f lN9 S N m N N 11 N NM CL A m O M N N qD Go M Mm M = 0 ON �6y 405 �tf m Y�a�Ol r r r y W a p� tJ c caC 2R � Xa< aR 2t �Se age, ae a< a4a 2R ae pa, 0 T $ , ; , -e X 2S va'ioumio 3n � t4i x '"W � j 000 ma•me ar� Ob o000 m U0 1 11 � a M M M M a n W O v tN�l g O N N.�- S N N N N g O X Y�f OM! YOi s V Z dce N N m♦ t♦p N N a m to m m m M M M�q g S N N p�p l'Of lN'f M ({O�� � � � � � �♦�7 , Ip M M M t9 l7 C1 q W W W W Qa WM M W W WM — 9! W W W W m M M M M CY Fr M M M M M YC M M M Of U crrr U r crr o U a. crr U rr rr r (7x < aada C9 �` Qaaaa O aaaa a C9 < aaaa Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections i 42 t � E 00 U. O O C. � rI � rNiecli n , CO V U. L O C O d LL a FO N V V M in V N b Obi er a Y en C m C MCD 1 Trp<� r O Cl M r I � M r` r' N $ A � 000 OOOO 4 n v v OObG N m � O a W � �- O co N <N�7 O O 0 0 0 O O Cl) c0 d �pj M ^ A V 7 Q. CD OO O C N m C C G p O _ m aacm O D O g 0 OOD N ' fN7 <O 0 0 0 O O O O r• M O m co co 0 N r r 7 •" N R N C-- <c+f Cl)n C 0 € N a C%lCq Copp N Z V C4 O aO0 <O m N O O O O O O O V r O O C4 g �[1 N Cl)O Cf 2 N f pso — N �nr rin � � rn OO <n Q m <nti � R o m N <0 10 °�j V M M f� Cl) r` � N M ui bL OD Cl) Q W N N r d• r <O <D ffVV N t0 Q (O f�. N g N N p ,• _ N to CA Ol v 1n Qi ��pp pp m p <'1 N C-- O Ln N r— co O h co (p <p N O O� O M Oi O O p <D <D N Yq•Y N <V <n r O fi! M fV <7 < C7 N N in g 4 3 m 1p� a a s N ED <p r C7 O1 O1 4'! O O O) <y R � p � t—vC4 � � � N OOO Pinin � v � � tNON � 10 Q 2 2 $ N N N N O ap C ap C N bY <b � Y Y <3 � Y Ydo wa, Y u; m � � e m ac a�i � rn p o c u m c m LL LL o -M v OY� LE E e O y m M m p Ear a s o <-' o uLO LU A E4. E ELL a co n 1I-2 w and na!pF u C7 C7 = O $ � d ! w lCL iy a. a. : m Q -- aa as y g LL a C, t 3 m r a o o �[ Y in o LL af S� ALL <g m o, r3 pw $ N Yr W gN c w W N Y CL tau w CL It r N N g 4 1 t t I pp pp ��pp n r n m 0 10 N m N Y o rppp N {�! Ln CDN b 0 W N N co M M N arD N s N t O off � � In � m r N N r• C9 n a0 O MW Npp�� r N 1 1 � TS ppm n ONE 01+f N10 Ym O 4m 0pmmp� w tg HN b OnN O 'o 0 r N N N N 00 Or b N N V ar r r r• �i7 Cr N Yna 0mmm � g dam o v o NmC) to m OW Q r t7 n m m m 0 0 Coco O �'+ <o r �n n m n m 0 Ol to n r r p G 0 0 0 O O r ' ' N l7 OJ G N s r S C r n � �` � 0 0 r r O te r ' � � h (� N Q m r r 40 c C 0 R NY N213 0mt. a � p CO r r hr r r s. hY1 CD O O p 'r co Cl) m0 N Af � � Nl)r N r V m EO 0 0 0 r r r b r n Y a (spy �pco iA p r N N N m m l0 l7 i7 Y C* {`9 N p W m p O O 'O a00 Y� C g�bp C r r r m N T N L N gp m N N O N m O n N ' Y :Q. N g N cc�� N m m n C�V N (07 m N v�v� 7 E R aaoo a (m 0 0 , r " r E8 Qm � � m � m o ; WNa Q7 N N 7 N r r V r 9 (,�0 00 U _ Nf0 n•ao Of Or- � rC4 my Y9 mnw WO� � d Z M 7 C 0 LL _ O _ O �L�+_ � � q�° CY � � 4X • N NV_> 03 'coo de € gym �� »' �: oEc t O � . > ;CD Ea � � "-C , o » �yy1� aoog�o � W IQ � O� N „ ym NO Ol CD J `O� m J 0�.�� i1 DO t 16 Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey , 1 i 1 Z 1 1 i t t r i Auburn School District Single Family Development Growth since 111199 April,2005 o Unitsi Current To Be Code Development Name Parcels cupanc Occupied Elem Middle HS Total Ashley Avenue 12 12 0 0 1 1 2 Bent Tree 20 20 0 17 6 10 33 Berkshire Crest 31 31 0 9 3 81. 20 Berkshire Glen 95 95 0 52 24 29 105 1-1-101 Berkshire Glen Phase 2 98 92 6 36 18 10 64 Bifrost Gate 521 52 0 251 15 61 46 Canterberry Crossing 20 20 0 61 1 01 7 Carrington Meadows 56 56 0 201 13 101 43 Country Green 22 22 0 231 7 01 30 Crystal Court 13 13 0 101 4 51 19 Crystal Meadows 27 27 01 121 6 31 21 Dennison Park 11 11 01 8 6 51 19 Donne Lane 16 16 0 3 3 31 9 Emerald Park ill 11 0 1 1 2 4 Jornada 941 94—0 23 12 8 43 i The Junction 49 49 0 22 10 10 42 Kalil Meadows 8 8 0 0 0 2 2 Kendall Heights 31 31 0 15 6 10 31 HZ01 Kingsley Meadows 56 21 35 7 2 0 9 Lakeland:Ashton 54 54 0 21 6 12 39 Lakeland:Ashton Phase 2 102 102 0 34 18 26 78 Lakeland: Eastpointe 80 80 0 —13 —6 11 30 Lakeland: Eastpointe, Div 2 66 66 0 6 5 10 21 Lakeland: Evergreen 491 49 0 —23 —5 8 36 Lakeland: Evergreen, Div 213 1021 102 0 15 7 7 29 Lakeland: Montiano 1041 104 0 19 4 7 30 Lakeland: Summit 22 22 0 2 1 11 4 Lakeland: Tuscan 76 76 0 23 12 111 46 GR00 Lakeland:Verona 400 122 278 24 17 131 54 Lakeland:View Ride 65 65 0 11 6 17 34 Lakeland:View Ridge South 74 741 0 14 11 14 39 LeeAnn Meadows 23 23 0 4 4 2 10 McDonnei Estates 6 6 0 21 2 0 4 Peasley Ride 54 54 0 13 8 16 37 DS07 River Park Estates 18 6 12 1 2 2 5 Riverwalk The Palisades at 145 145 0 39 20 22 B1 Royal Hills Division 1 49 49 0 8 7 7 22 Royal Hills Division 2 331 33 0 8 2 2 12 Soos Creek Vista 10 10 0 1 1 0 2 Summerfield Estates 40 40 0 10 4 3 17 Swansons Flat 21 21 0 151 4 3 22 Valley View Estates 8 8 0 71 2 0 9 Vintage Hills, Division 6 61 61 0 241 11 91 44 Vintage Hills Division 7 20 20 0 71 1 11 9 EH02 Vistara 2 38 33 5 81 2 6H�ih 11 LV05 Washington National, Div 1 42 32 10 8 6 17 Willow Park,The Ridge at 94 94 0 46 26 97 Willow Park The Ridge-Ph 2 47 47 0 38 23 78 . 7 Student Generation actors 216 Elements Middle Total 111 55 Be 223 46 Aubum School District Single Farrry Development Growth since 1/11W 2005 April,2005 HZ01 Auburn Place 14 0 14 LH04 Backbone Ride 7 0 7 HZ01 Cambridge Pointe 26 0 26 HZ01 Carrington Pointe 24 0 24 HZ04 Dawson Hills 6 0 6 , AL01 Hansen Development 31 0 31 HZ01 Hazel Park 15 Ol 15 GROO Lakeland: Future 181 0 181 GR00 Lakeland. Thulme 95 0 95 LV07/0 Little Fields 8 0 8 LHO4 Marchim Meadows 83 0 S3 LV07 Mystery Heights 6 0 6 AL01 Pacific Meadows 44 0 44 WA02 Plemmons Development 8 0 8 HZ01 River Rim 12 0 12 EH06 Riverpointe 12 0 12 HZ01 White Mountain Trails 30 0 30 Elementa Middle High Total 1 2006 and Up Wa 1 194 I 95 I98 LV05 Anderson Acres 14 0 14 IL02 Aspen Meadows 21 0 21 EH04 Auburn 40 600 0 600 LH04 Brandon Meadows 55 0 55 LHO6 Brandon Place 78 0 78 HZ01 Dal t Dhaliwal Plat 8 0 8 LH04 Harpreet Kang 8 0 8 HZ01 Hazel View 20 0 20 LHO4 Kendall Ride 109 0 109 HZ01 Kent Impound Area 376 0 376 GR04 Kersey 3 Project 403 0 403 HZ03 Potter Plat 33 0 33 1-1-106 lVintage Place 25 0 25 1-1-104 lWillow Place i 181 01 Elementa Middle Hi h Total 17 56 Projected Additional Students to� Elemental Middle I High I Total 87 443 1 47 , 1 i 47 t t Aubum School District Development Growth since 1/1/99 April, 2005 MULTI FAMILY Goo Units/ Current To Be Code Development Name Parcels occupanci occupied Elem Middle HS Total Cherry Meadows 16 16 0 6 7 2 15 Emerald Pointe 93 93 0 3 3 8 14 GR00 Lakeland. Capri 168 132 36 1 0 2 3 Lakeland: Foxwood Townhomes 691 69 0 3 2 1 6 Lakeland: Heatherwood Townhor 92 92 0 2 1 2 5 Lakeland: MITI Pond Apartments 123 123 0 12 4 4 20 GR00 Lakeland: Siena 73 0 73 0 1 3 4 Meadow Valley Condominiums 78 78 0 5 4 6 15 Pasa Fina Apartments 147 147 01 101 8 6 24 Villa e Square Townhomes 941 94 0 16 9 7 32 953 109 58 39 41 138 Student Generation Factors 0.0687 0.0462 0.0486 0.1636 Elementai Middle High Total 7 5 5 16 2005 GR03 "D" Street Plat 32 0 32 IL02 Faehnrich Addition 7 0 7 GR00 Lakeland: Future 168 0 168 IL01 Lakeland: Vista Heights 38 0 38 LH06 Worley Condominiums 19 0 19 Elements Middle High Total 264 1 264 [i8 12 13 43 Total Elementa4 Middle High Total �26 1 17 18 61 48 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Issued with a 14-day comment and appeals period Description of Proposal: , This threshold determination analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the following actions, which are so closely related to each other that they are in effect a single course of action: 1. The adoption of the Auburn School District's Capital Facilities Plan 2005-2010 by the Auburn School District No. 408 for the purposes of planning for the facilities needs of the District; and 2. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of King County and Pierce County and the cities of Auburn and Kent to include the Auburn School District's Capital Facilities Plan 2005-2010 as part of the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. The cities of Algona and Pacific may also amend their Comprehensive Plans to include the Auburn School District's Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. Proponent: Auburn School District No. 408 Location of the Proposal: The Auburn School District includes an area of approximately 57 square miles. The Cities of Auburn, Algona, and Pacific and parts of unincorporated King and Pierce Counties fall within the District's boundaries. Lead Agency: Auburn School District No. 408 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse environmental impact on the environment An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after a review of the completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public upon request. 1 This Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issue. Comments must be submitted by_4:00 p.m., April 25, 2005. The responsible official will reconsider the DNS based_ on timely comments and may retain, modify, or, if significant adverse impacts are likely, withdraw the DNS. If the DNS is retained, it will be final after the expiration of the comment deadline. Responsible Official: Mike Newman Assistant Superintendent, Business and Operations Auburn School District No. 408 tTelephone: (253)931-4900 Address: Auburn School District 915 4`h Street N.E. Auburn, WA 98002 jYou may appeal this determination in writing by 4:00 p.m., April 25, 2005, to Linda Cowan, Superintendent, Auburn School District No. 408, 915 4th Street N.E., Auburn, WA 98002 Date of Issue: April 11, 2005 Date Published: April 11, 2005 j i 1 � 1 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAC 197-11-960 Environmental Checklist. Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all govemmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: ■ This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about a your proposal. Govemmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, , and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for non- project actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND j1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: The adoption of the Auburn School District's 2005-2010 Capital Facilities Plan ("Capital +, Facilities Plan") for the purposes of planning for the District's facilities needs. The cities j of Auburn and Kent and the King County and Pierce County Comprehensive Plans will be amended to include the Auburn School District 2005 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. The Cities of Algona and Pacific Comprehensive Plans may be amended to include the Auburn School District 2005 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. A copy of the District's Capital Facilities Plan is available for review in the District's offices. 2. Name of-applicant: Auburn School District No. 408. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Auburn School District No.408 I 915 4t°St. N.E. Auburn,WA 98002 Contact Person: Mike Newman,Assistant Superintendent, Business/Operations Telephone: (253) 931-4900 4. Date checklist prepared: April 6, 2005 2 5. Agency requesting checklist: Auburn School District No. 408. ' 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable): The Capital Facilities Plan is scheduled to be adopted by the District on April 25, 2005. After adoption, the District will forward the Capital Facilities Plan to the cities of Auburn, Algona, Kent, and Pacific, acid to King County and Pierce County for inclusion in each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. The Capital Facilities Plan will be updated j annually. Site-specific projects will be subject to project-level environmental review. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The Capital Facilities Plan sets forth the capital improvement projects that the District plans to implement over the next six years. The District plans to construct a new high school, a new middle school, and two new elementary schools over the next six years to meet projected student population increases. The District may also add portable facilities at existing school sites. The District will also conduct technology modernization projects at facilities throughout the District. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have undergone or will undergo additional environmental review,when appropriate, as they are developed. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your ' proposal, if known. The cities of Auburn and Kent will review and adopt the Capital Facilities Plan for the purposes of updating the cities' school impact fees and incorporating the updated Plan as a part of the Capital Facilities Elements of both the Auburn and Kent Comprehensive Plans. King County and Pierce County will review the Plan for the purposes of implementing the Counties' impact fee ordinance and incorporating the Plan as a part of the Capital Facilities Element of both the King and Pierce County Comprehensive Plans. 3 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) This is a nonproject action. This proposal involves the adoption of the Auburn School District's Capital Facilities Plan 2005-2010 for the purpose of planning the District's facilities needs. This proposal also involves the amendment of the cities of Auburn and Kent Comprehensive Plans and the King and Pierce Counties' Comprehensive Plans to include the 2005 Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan as a part of each jurisdiction's Capital Facilities Element of their Comprehensive Plans. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The 2005 Capital Facilities Plan will affect the Auburn School District. The District includes an area of approximately 57 square miles. The Cities of Auburn, Algona, and Pacific, and parts of unincorporated King County and Pierce County fall within the District's boundaries. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other . The Auburn School District is comprised of a variety of topographic landforms and gradients. Specific topographic characteristics of the sites at which the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan are located have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 4 b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Specific slope characteristics at the sites of the projects included in the Capital ' Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review. c. What general types of soils,are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Specific soil types found at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. I I d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Unstable soils may exist within the Auburn School District. Specific soil limitations , on individual project sites have been or will be identified at the time of project-level environmental review when appropriate. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject, when appropriate, to project-level environmental review and local approval at the time of proposal. Proposed grading projects, as well as the purpose, type, quantity, and source of any fill materials to be used have been or will be identified at that time. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. It is possible that erosion could occur as a result of the construction projects currently proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan. The erosion impacts of the individual projects have been or will be evaluated on a site-specific basis at the time of project-level environmental review when appropriate. Individual projects have been or will be subject to local approval processes. 5 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces _ after project construction-(for example, asphalt or buildings?) The construction projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have required or will require the construction of impervious surfaces. The extent of any impervious cover constructed will vary with each project included in the Capital Facilities Plan. This issue has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate.' h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: The erosion potential of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and appropriate control measures have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Relevant erosion reduction and control requirements have been or will be met. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Various emissions, many construction-related, may result from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The air-quality impacts of each project have been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project- level environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: The individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-level environmental review and relevant local approval processes when appropriate. The District has been or will be required to comply with all 6 applicable air regulations and air permit requirements. Proposed measures specific to the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be ' addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 3. Water a. Surface: j 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. - I There is a network of surface water bodies within the Auburn School District. The surface water bodies that are in the immediate vicinity of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. When necessary, the surface water regimes and flow patterns have been or will be researched and incorporated into the designs of the individual projects. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require work near the surface waters located within the Auburn School District. Applicable local i approval requirements have been or will be satisfied. ■ 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Information with respect to the placement or removal of fill and dredge matenal as a component of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied. 7 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Any surface water withdrawals or diversions required in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. ! 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Each project included in the Capital Facilities Plan, if located in a floodplain area, has beer or will be required to meet applicable local regulations for flood areas. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Specific information regarding the discharge of waste materials that may be required as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Ground: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may impact groundwater resources. The impact of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on groundwater resources has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project has been or will be subject to applicable local regulations. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. i 8 The discharges of waste material that may take place in connection with the projects included in the Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): i 1) Describe the source Qf runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will j this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may have stormwater runoff consequences. Specific information regarding the stormwater impacts of each project has been or will be provided during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project has been or will be subject to applicable local stormwater regulations. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may result in the discharge of waste materials into ground or surface waters. The specific impacts of each project on ground and surface waters have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project has been or will be subject to all applicable regulations regarding the discharge of waste materials into ground and surface waters. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Specific measures to reduce or, control runoff impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. . i 1 1 9 4. Plants: a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation A variety of vegetative zones are located within the Auburn School District. Inventories of the vegetation located on the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project-level environmental tview when appropriate. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require the removal or alteration of vegetation. The specific impacts on vegetation of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. The specific impacts to these species from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plans, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Measures to preserve or enhance vegetation at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local landscaping requirements. 10 5. Animals: a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the ' site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other f mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other. An inventory of species that have been observed on or near the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project- level environmental review when appropriate. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Inventories of threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during ' project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The impacts of the projects,included in the Capital Facilities Plan on migration routes have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Appropriate measures to preserve or enhance wildlife have been or will be determined during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The State Board of Education requires the completion of a life-cycle cost analysis of all heating, lighting, and insulation systems before it will permit specific school projects to proceed. The energy needs of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined at the time of specific engineering and site 11 design planning when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so;generally describe: 1 The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on the solar potential of adjacent projects have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. i c. What kinds 'of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Energy conservation measures proposed in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be considered during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 7. Environmental Health: a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan comply or will comply with all current codes, standards, rules, and regulations. Individual projects have been or will be subject to project-level environmental review and local approval at the time they are developed, when appropriate. 12 b. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? A variety of noises from traffic, construction, residential, commercial, and r industrial areas exists within the Auburn School District. The specific noise sources that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be idenpfied during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 1 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create normal construction noises that will exist on short-term bases only. The construction projects could increase traffic around the construction sites on a short-term basis. Because the construction of additional school capacity will increase the capacity of the District's school facilities, this project may create a slight increase in traffic-related or operations-related noise on a long-term basis. Similarly, the placement of portables at school sites will increase the capacity of school facilities and may create a slight increase in traffic-related or operations-related noise. Neither of these potential increases is expected to be significant. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The projected noise impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated and mitigated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? There are a variety of land uses within the Auburn School District, including residential, commercial, industrial, institutional,utility,open space,recreational, etc. f 13 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. iThe known sites for the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have not been used recently for agriculture. c. Describe any structures on the site. jThe structures located on the sites for the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified and described during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? The structures that will be demolished as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, if any, have been or will be identified during project-level environmental 'review when appropriate. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The sites that are covered under the Capital Facilities Plan have a variety of zoning classifications under the applicable zoning codes. Site-specific zoning information has been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Inventories of the comprehensive plan designations for the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be completed during project- level environmental review when appropriate. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Shoreline master program designations of the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 1 14 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Any environmentally sensitive areas located on the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review. I. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The Auburn School District currently serves approximately 13,031 full-time 1 equivalent ("FTE") students. Enrollment is expected to increase to approximately 14,478 FTE students by the 2009-2010 school year. J. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Any displacement of people caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. However, it is not anticipated that the Capital Facilities Plan, or any of the projects contained therein, will displace any people. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-level environmental review and local approval when appropriate. Proposed mitigating measures have been or will be developed at that time,when necessary. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The compatibility of the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan with existing uses and plans has been or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive planning process and during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 9. Housing: a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? 'Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. No housing units would be provided in connection with the completion of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. 15 b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. It is not anticipated that the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will eliminate any housing units. The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on existing housing have been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Measures to reduce or control any housing impacts caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 10. Aesthetics: a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental revie-,when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Appropriate measures to reduce or control the aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined on a project- level basis when appropriate. 16 11. Light and Glare: a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The light or glare impacts of the'projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review, when appropriate. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Off-site sources of light or glare that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Proposed measures to mitigate light and glare impacts have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 12. Recreation: a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are a variety of formal and informal recreational facilities within the Auburn , School District. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. The recreational impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 17 The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, including proposed new school facilities,may enhance recreational opportunities and uses. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Adverse recreational effects of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to mitigation during project-level environmental review when appropriate. School facilities usually provide recreational facilities to the community in the form of play fields and gymnasiums. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. 1 There are no known places or objects listed on, or proposed for, such registers for the project sites included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The existence of historic and cultural resources on or next to the sites has been or will be addressed in detail during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. An inventory of historical sites at or near the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Appropriate measures will be proposed on a project-level basis when appropriate. 14. Transportation: a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The impact on public streets and highways of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 18 b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The relationship between the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan j and public transit has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Inventories of parking spaces located at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and the impacts of specific projects on parking availability have been or will be conducted during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The need for new streets or roads, or improvements to existing streets and roads has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Use of water,'rail, or air transportation has been or will be addressed during project- level environmental review when appropriate. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. j The traffic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The mitigation of traffic impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 19 15. Public Services: a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for T example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The District does not anticipate that the projects identified in the Capital Facilities Plan will significantly increase the need for public services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. New school facilities have been or will be built with automatic security systems, fire alarms, smoke alarms,heat sensors, and sprinkler systems. 16. Utilities: a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, and sanitary sewer utilities are available at the known sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The types of utilities available at specific project sites have been or will be addressed in more detail during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Utility revisions and construction needs have been or will be identified during project- level environmental review when appropriate. � 20 C. S{GNATURE_ The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: 1 21 i SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? To the extent the Capital Facilities Plan makes it more likely that school facilities, including new high school, middle school and elementary school capacity, will be constructed, some of these environmental impacts will be more likely. Additional impermeable surfaces, such as roofs, access roads, and sidewalks could increase stormwater runoff; which could enter surface or ground waters. Heating systems, emergency generators, and other school equipment that is installed pursuant to the Capital Facilities Plan could result in air emissions. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan should not require the production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances, with the possible exception of the storage of diesel fuel or gasoline for emergency generating equipment. The District does not anticipate a significant increase in the production of noise from its facilities, although the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will increase the District's student capacities. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Proposed measures to mitigate any such increases described above have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Stormwater detention and runoff will meet applicable County and/or City requirements and may be subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permitting requirements. Discharges to air will meet applicable air pollution control requirements. Fuel oil will be stored in accordance with local and state requirements. t2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The Capital Facilities Plan itself will have no impact on these elements of the environment. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require clearing plants off of the project sites and a loss to animal habitat. These impacts have been or 22 will be addressed in more detail during project-level environmental review when appropriate. The projects included in the Plan are not likely to generate significant impacts on fish or marine life. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Specific measures to protect and conserve plants, animals, and fish cannot be identified at this time. Specific mitigation proposals will be identified, however, during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The construction of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will require the consumption of energy. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be constructed in accordance with applicable energy efficiency standards. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The Capital Facilities Plan and individual projects contained therein should have no impact on these resources. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: No specific measures are being proposed at this time. Appropriate measures would be proposed during project-specific review. Annual updates of this Plan will be coordinated with the Cities of Auburn, Algona, Kent, and Pacific, and King and Pierce Counties as part of the Growth Management Act process, one of the purposes of which is to protect environmentally sensitive areas. To the extent the School District's facilities planning process is part of the overall Growth Management planning process, these resources are more likely to be protected. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The Capital Facilities Plan will not have any impact on land or shoreline use that is incompatible with existing comprehensive plans, land use codes, or shoreline 23 management plans. The District does not anticipate that the Capital Facilities Plan or ' the projects contained4hsrein wilt directly affect land and shoreline uses in the area served by the District. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: No measures to avoid or reduce land use impacts resulting from the Capital Facilities Plan or the projects contained therein are proposed at this time. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The construction projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create temporary increases m the District's need for public services and utilities. The new school facilities will increase the District's demands on transportation and utilities. These increases are not expected to be significant. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: No measures to reduce or respond to such demands are proposed at this time. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The Capital Facilities Plan will not conflict with any laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. i i 24 Kent City Council Meeting Date _ December 13,2005 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: LTGO 2006 PARKS BOND ORDINANCE— ADOPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No. authorizing approval of the 2006 Parks Limited Tax General Obligation (LTGO) bonds ordinance which will provide $12 million for various parks improvements. 3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance and memo from Finance Director 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Anticipated in 2006 budget Expenditure? No Revenue? No Currently in the Budget? Yes No If no: Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue. Fund Amount $ 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Q ,, � Councilmember �J� moves, Councdmember I \ seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION. Council Agenda Item No. 6G KEN T WASNINGTON FINANCE R. 1. Nach linger,Director Phone 253-856-5260 Fax. 253-856-6255 Address,220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, wA 98032-5895 December 6, 2005 TO: Kent City Council Operations Committee FROM: R. J. Nachlinger, Finance Director THROUGH: John Hodgson, Interim Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: Ordinance Authorizing the Issuance of $12 million in Parks LTGO Bonds MOTION: I move to recommend that the Operations Committee authorize the ordinance to issue $12 million in Parks LTGO bonds and to place the item on the City Council agenda for the meeting of December 13, 2005. SUMMARY: The Administration plans to issue $12 million in Parks Improvement Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds for various improvements for our Parks System. The projects to be funded include the Service Club Ball-fields, the East Hill Skate Park, the Town Square Plaza and the acquisition of additional land for park purposes. Construction has already commenced on the Service Club Ball-fields and the proceeds of the bonds will be used to reimburse the City for costs incurred. BUDGET IMPACT: The impact on the debt service has been anticipated in the 2006 budget with the increase in the capital projects beginning balance increasing from the higher than expected real estate excise tax collections. DRAFT DATED 11/17/2005 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, Washington, relating to contracting indebtedness; providing for the issuance of [$12,000,000] par value of Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds, 2006, of the City for general City purposes to provide funds with which to pay costs of completing construction of existing City recreational parks and the acquisition of additional land for park purposes; fixing the date, form, maturities, interest rates, terms and covenants of the bonds; establishing a bond redemption fund and a construction and acquisition fund; [providing for bond insurance;] and approving the sale and providing for the delivery of the bonds to Banc of America Securities LLC of Seattle, Washington. PASSED: December 13, 2005 This document prepared by.- Foster Pepper&Shefelman PLLC I I I I Third Avenue, Sulte 3400 Seattle, Washington 96101 (206) 447-4400 LTGO Bonds, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1. — Debt Capacity.................................................................................2 SECTION 2. — Authorization of Bonds....................................................................2 SECTION 3. — Description of Bonds.......................................................................2 SECTION 4. — Registration and Transfer of Bonds..................................................3 SECTION S. — Payment of Bonds...........................................................................5 SECTION 6. — Redemption of Provisions and Open Market Purchase of Bonds. ........5 SECTION 7. — Notice of Redemption......................................................................6 SECTION 8. — Failure To Redeem Bonds................................................................7 i SECTION 9. — Pledge of Taxes..............................................................................7 SECTION 10. — Form and Execution of Bonds........................................................8 !, SECTION 11. — Bond Registrar..............................................................................9 SECTION 12. — Preservation of Tax Exemption for Interest on Bonds......................9 SECTION 13. — Refunding or Defeasance of the Bonds...........................................9 SECTION 14. — Bond Fund and Deposit of Bond Proceeds .................................... 11 SECTION 15. —Approval of Bond Purchase Agreement......................................... 11 SECTION 16. — Preliminary Official Statement Deemed Final................................. 12 SECTION 17. — Undertaking to Provide Continuing Disclosure............................... 12 SECTION 18. — Bond Insurance .......................................................................... 15 SECTION 19. — Effective Date of Ordinance......................................................... 15 -i- L TGO Bonds, 2006 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON ' ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, Washington, relating to contracting indebtedness; providing for the issuance of [$12,000,000] par value of Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds, 2006, of the City for general City purposes to provide funds with which to pay costs of completing construction of existing City recreational parks and the acquisition of additional land for park purposes; fixing the date, form, maturities, interest rates, terms and covenants of the bonds; establishing a bond redemption fund and a construction and acquisition fund; [providing for bond insurance;] and approving the sale and providing for the delivery of the bonds to Banc of America Securities LLC of Seattle, Washington. RECITALS A. The City of Kent, Washington (the "City', is in need of completing construction of the City's Service Club Ballfields, East Hill Skate Park, Town Square Plaza and acquiring additional land for park purposes, the estimated cost of which is $ and the City does not have available sufficient funds to pay the cost; and B. (" " or the "Bond Insurer'), has made a commitment to issue an insurance policy (the " Insurance Policy's insuring the payment when due of the principal of and interest on the Bonds as provided therein, and the City Council deems that the purchase of the ' Insurance Policy is in the best interest of the City; and C. Banc of America Securities LLC has offered to purchase the Bonds under the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; 1 LTGO Bonds, 2006 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTONj-DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: -= -,- SECTION 1, —Debt Canacilx The assessed valuation of the taxable property within the City as ascertained by the last preceding assessment for City purposes for the calendar year 2005 is $8,798,031,223, and the City has outstanding general indebtedness evidenced by limited tax general obligation bonds, notes, leases and , conditional sales contracts in the principal amount of $ incurred within the limit of up to 1-1/2% of the value of the taxable property within the City permitted for general municipal purposes without a vote of the qualified voters therein, unlimited tax general obligation bonds in the principal amount of $ incurred within the limit of up to 2 1/2% of the value of the taxable property within the City for capital purposes only, issued pursuant to a vote of the qualified voters of the City, and the amount of indebtedness for which bonds are authorized herein to be issued is [$12,000,000]. SECTION 2. —Authorization of Bonds The City shall borrow money on the credit of the City and issue negotiable limited tax general obligation bonds evidencing that indebtedness in the amount of [$12,000,000] for general City purposes to provide the funds to pay costs of completing construction of the City's Service Club Ballfields, East Hill Skate Park, Town Square Plaza and acquiring additional land for park purposes (the "Project') and to pay the costs of issuance and sale of the bonds (the "costs of issuance'). The general indebtedness to be incurred shall be within the limit of up to 1-1/2% of the value of the taxable property within the City permitted for general municipal purposes without a vote of the qualified voters therein. SECTION 3. — Description of Bonds. The bonds shall be called Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds, 2006, of the City (the "Bonds'D; shall be in the aggregate principal amount of [$12,000,000]; shall be dated the date of their initial delivery; shall be in the denomination of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof within a single maturity; shall be numbered separately in the manner and with any additional designation as the fiscal agent of the state of Washington (as the same may be designated by the state of Washington from time to time) (the "Bond Registrar') deems necessary for purposes of identification; shall bear interest (computed on the 2 L TGO Bonds, 2006 basis of a 360 day year of twelve 30 day months) payable semiannually on each June -+ . z-1<and December-1.--commencing June 1, 2006, to the maturity-or earlier redemption - of the Bonds; and shall mature on December 1 in years and amounts and bear interest at the rates per annum as follows: Maturity Interest Years Amounts Rates 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 1 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 The life of the capital facilities to be constructed and land to be acquired with the proceeds of the Bonds exceeds the term of the Bonds. SECTION 4. -Registration and Transfer of Bonds The Bonds shall be issued only in registered form as to both principal and interest and shall be recorded on ' books or records maintained by the Bond Registrar (the "Bond Register'. The Bond Register shall contain the name and mailing address of the owner of each Bond and the principal amount and number of each of the Bonds held by each owner. Bonds surrendered to the Bond Registrar may be exchanged for Bonds in any authorized denomination of an equal aggregate principal amount and of the same interest rate and maturity. Bonds may be transferred only if endorsed in the manner provided thereon and surrendered to the Bond Registrar. Any exchange or transfer 3 L TGO Bands, 2006 shall be without cost to the owner or transferee. The Bond Registrar shall not be obligated to exchange or transfer any Bond during the 15 days-.preceding any principal payment or redemption date. The Bonds initially shall be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as the nominee of The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York ("DTC'). The Bonds so registered shall be held in fully immobilized form by DTC as depository in accordance with the provisions of a Blanket Issuer Letter of Representations dated March 16, 1999, between the City and DTC (as it may be amended). Neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall have any responsibility or obligation to DTC participants or the persons for whom they act as nominees with respect to the Bonds regarding accuracy of any records maintained by DTC or DTC participants of any amount in respect of principal of or interest on the Bonds, or any notice which is permitted or required to be given to registered owners hereunder (except such notice as is required to be given by the Bond Registrar to DTC). For as long as any Bonds are held in fully immobilized form, DTC, its nominee or its successor depository shall be deemed to be the registered owner for all purposes hereunder and all references to registered owners, bondowners, bondholders or the like shall mean DTC or its nominee and shall not mean the owners of any beneficial interests in the Bonds. Registered ownership of such Bonds, or any portions thereof, may not thereafter be transferred except: (1) to any successor of DTC or its nominee, if that successor shall be qualified under any applicable laws to provide the services proposed to be provided by it; (u) to any substitute depository appointed by the City or such substitute depository's successor; or (iu) to any person if the Bonds are no longer held in immobilized form. Upon the resignation of DTC or its successor (or any substitute depository or its successor) from its functions as depository, or a determination by the City that it no longer wishes to continue the system of book entry transfers through DTC or its successor (or any substitute depository or its successor), the City may appoint a substitute depository. Any such substitute depository shall be qualified under any applicable laws to provide the services proposed to be provided by it. If (i) DTC or its successor (or substitute depository or its successor) resigns from its functions as depository, and no substitute depository can be obtained, or (11) 4 L TGO Bonds, 2006 the City determines that the Bonds are to be in certificated form, the ownership of Bonds may be transferred to any person as provided herein and 1ae_Bonds no-longer. _ shall be held in fully immobilized form. SECTIONS. —Payment of Bonds Both principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America. Interest on the Bonds shall be paid by checks or drafts of the Bond Registrar mailed on the interest payment date to the registered owners at the addresses appearing on the Bond Register on the 15th day of the month preceding the interest payment date or, if requested in writing by a registered owner of Bonds prior to the applicable record jdate, by wire transfer on the interest payment date, provided that, the costs of such wire transfer shall be paid by the requesting registered owner. Principal of the Bonds shall be payable upon presentation and surrender of the Bonds by the registered owners to the Bond Registrar. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for as long as the Bonds are registered in the name of DTC or its nominee, payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be made in the manner set forth in the Letter of Representations. SECTION 6. —Redemption of Provisions and Open Market Purchase of Bonds Bonds maturing in the years 2006 through 2015, inclusive, shall be issued without the right or option of the City to redeem those Bonds prior to their stated maturity dates. The City reserves the right and option to redeem the Bonds maturing on or after December 1, 2016, prior to their stated maturity dates at any time on or after December 1, 2015, as a whole or in part (within one or more maturities selected by the City and randomly within a maturity in such manner as the Bond Registrar shall determine), at par plus accrued interest to the date fixed for redemption. [ADD FOR TERM BONDS] [Bonds maturing in are Term Bonds and, if not redeemed under the optional redemption provisions set forth above or purchased in the open market 5 L TGO Bonds, 2006 under the provisions set forth below, shall be called for redemption randomly (in such manner—w the Bond�Registrar shall determine) at par plus accrued interest on December 1 in years and amounts as follows: Mandatory Mandatory Redemption Redemption Years Amounts [insert mandatory redemption schedule] [If the City redeems under the optional redemption provisions, purchases in the open market or defeases Term Bonds, the par amount of the Term Bonds so redeemed, purchased or defeased (irrespective of their actual redemption or purchase prices) shall be credited against one or more scheduled mandatory redemption amounts for those Term Bonds. The City shall determine the manner in which the credit is to be allocated and shall notify the Bond Registrar in writing of its allocation at least 60 days prior to the earliest mandatory redemption date for that maturity of Term Bonds for which notice of redemption has not already been given.] Portions of the principal amount of any Bond, in installments of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, may be redeemed. If less than all of the principal amount of any Bond is redeemed, upon surrender of that Bond to the Bond Registrar, there shall be issued to the registered owner, without charge therefor, a new Bond (or Bonds, at the option of the registered owner) of the same maturity and interest rate in any of the denominations authorized by this ordinance in the aggregate principal amount remaining unredeemed. The City further reserves the right and option to purchase any or all of the Bonds in the open market at any time at any price acceptable to the City plus accrued interest to the date of purchase. All Bonds purchased or redeemed under this section shall be canceled. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for as long as the Bonds are registered in the name of DTC or its nominee, selection of Bonds for redemption shall be in accordance with the Letter of Representations. SECUON7. — Notrce of Redemption. The City shall cause notice of any intended redemption of Bonds to be given not less than 30 nor more than 60 days 6 L TGO Bonds, 2006 prior to the date fixed for redemption by first-class mail, postage prepaid, to the =v= registered owner-terry florid.to be redeemed at the address appearing on the_Bw-c�-,..- Register at the time the Bond Registrar prepares the notice, and the requirements of this sentence shall be deemed to have been fulfilled when notice has been mailed as so provided, whether or not it is actually received by the owner of any Bond. Interest on Bonds called for redemption shall cease to accrue on the date fixed for redemption unless the Bond or Bonds called are not redeemed when presented pursuant to the call. In addition, the redemption notice shall be mailed within the same period, postage prepaid, to Moody's Investors Service, Inc., and Standard & Poor's at their offices in New York, New York, or their successors, [to the Bond Insurer, at its principal office in , New York, or its successor,] to each NRMSIR or the MSRB and to such other persons, including registered securities depositories, and with such additional information as the City Finance Director shall determine, but these additional mailings shall not be a condition precedent to the redemption of Bonds. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for as long as the Bonds are registered in the name of DTC or its nominee, notice of redemption shall be given in accordance with the Letter of Representations. SECTION 8. — Failure To Redeem Bonds. If any Bond is not redeemed when properly presented at its maturity or call date, the City shall be obligated to pay interest on that Bond at the same rate provided in the Bond from and after its maturity or call date until that Bond, both principal and interest, is paid in full or until sufficient money for its payment in full is on deposit in the bond redemption fund hereinafter created and the Bond has been called for payment by giving notice of that call to the registered owner of each of those unpaid Bonds. SECTION 9. — Pledge of Taxes For as long as any of the Bonds are outstanding, the City irrevocably pledges to include in its budget and levy taxes annually within the constitutional and statutory tax limitations provided by law without a vote of the electors of the City on all of the taxable property within the City in an amount sufficient, together with other money legally available and to be used therefor, to pay when due the principal of and interest on the Bonds, and the full 7 L TGO Bonds, 2006 faith, credit and resources of the City are pledged irrevocably for the annual levy and collection of those taxes and the prompt payment of that principal and interest. SECTION 10. —Form and Execution of Bonds The Bonds shall be printed or lithographed on good bond paper in a form consistent with the provisions of this ordinance and state law and shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk, either or both of whose signatures may be manual or in facsimile, and the seal of the City or a facsimile reproduction thereof shall be impressed or printed thereon. Only Bonds bearing a Certificate of Authentication in the following form, manually signed by the Bond Registrar, shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to the benefits of this ordinance: CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This Bond is one of the fully registered City of Kent, Washington, Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds, 2006, described in the Bond Ordinance. WASHINGTON STATE FISCAL AGENT Bond Registrar By Authorized Signer The authorized signing of a Certificate of Authentication shall be conclusive evidence that the Bond so authenticated has been duly executed, authenticated and delivered and is entitled to the benefits of this ordinance. If any officer whose facsimile signature appears on the Bonds ceases to be an officer of the City authorized to sign bonds before the Bonds bearing his or her facsimile signature are authenticated or delivered by the Bond Registrar or issued by the City, those Bonds nevertheless may be authenticated, issued and delivered and, when authenticated, issued and delivered, shall be as binding on the City as though that person had continued to be an officer of the City authorized to sign bonds. Any Bond also may be signed on behalf of the City by any person who, on the actual date of signing of the Bond, is an officer of the City authorized to sign bonds, although he or she did not hold the required office on the date of issuance of the Bonds. 8 L TGO Bonds, 2006 SECTION 11. — Bond Registrar. The Bond Registrar shall keep, or cause to be kept, sufficient books-for the registration and transfer of the Bonds, wNch-staN_be: open to inspection by the City at all times. The Bond Registrar is authorized, on behalf of the City, to authenticate and deliver Bonds transferred or exchanged in accordance with the provisions of the Bonds and this ordinance, to serve as the City's paying agent for the Bonds and to carry out all of the Bond Registrar's powers and duties under this ordinance and City Ordinance No. 2418 establishing a system of registration for the Gty's bonds and obligations. The Bond Registrar shall be responsible for its representations contained in the Bond Registrar's Certificate of Authentication on the Bonds. The Bond Registrar may become the owner of Bonds with the same rights it would have if it were not the Bond Registrar and, to the extent permitted by law, may act as depository for and permit any of its officers or directors to act as members of, or in any other capacity with respect to, any committee formed to protect the rights of Bond owners. SECTION IZ. — Preservation of Tax Exemotion for Interest on Bonds. The fCity covenants that it will take all actions necessary to prevent interest on the Bonds from being included in gross income for federal income tax purposes, and it will neither take any action nor make or permit any use of proceeds of the Bonds or other funds of the City treated as proceeds of the Bonds at any time during the term of the Bonds which will cause interest on the Bonds to be included in gross income for federal income tax purposes. The City also covenants that it will, to the extent the arbitrage rebate requirement of Section 148 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code', is applicable to the Bonds, take all actions necessary to comply (or to be treated as having complied) with that requirement in connection with the Bonds, including the calculation and payment of any penalties that the City has elected to pay as an alternative to calculating rebatable arbitrage, and the payment of any other penalties if required under Section 148 of the Code to prevent interest on the Bonds from being included in gross income for federal income tax purposes. SECTION 13. — Refunding or Defeasance of the Bonds The City may issue refunding bonds pursuant to the laws of the State of Washington or use money available from any other lawful source to pay when due the principal of and interest 9 L TGO Bonds, 2006 on the Bonds, or any portion thereof included in a refunding or defeasance plan, and to redeem and retire, refund or defease all such then-outstanding Bonds (hereinafter. ---- collectively called the 'defeased Bonds' and to pay the costs of the refunding or defeasance. If money and/or direct obligations of the United States of America maturing at a time or times and bearing interest in amounts (together with money, if necessary) sufficient to redeem and retire, refund or defease the defeased Bonds in accordance with their terms are set aside in a special trust fund or escrow account irrevocably pledged to that redemption, retirement or defeasance of defeased Bonds (hereinafter called the"trust account', then all right and interest of the owners of the defeased Bonds in the covenants of this ordinance and in the funds and accounts obligated to the payment of the defeased Bonds shall cease and become void. The owners of defeased Bonds shall have the right to receive payment of the principal of and interest on the defeased Bonds from the trust account. The City shall include in the refunding or defeasance plan such provisions as the City deems necessary for the random selection of any defeased Bonds that constitute less than all of a particular maturity of the Bonds, for notice of the defeasance to be given to the owners of the defeased Bonds and to such other persons as the City shall determine, and for any required replacement of Bond certificates for defeased Bonds. The defeased Bonds shall be deemed no longer outstanding, and the City may apply any money in any other fund or account established for the payment or redemption of the defeased Bonds to any lawful purposes as it shall determine. Notwithstanding anything in this section to the contrary, if the principal of and/or interest due on the Bonds is paid by the Bond Insurer pursuant to the Insurance Policy, the Bonds shall be treated as remaining outstanding for all purposes, not defeased or otherwise satisfied and shall not be considered paid by the City, and the assignment and pledge of the taxes and all other covenants, agreements and other obligations of the City to the registered owners of the Bonds shall continue to exist and shall run to the benefit of the Bond Insurer, and the Bond Insurer shall be subrogated to the rights of those registered owners. If the Bonds are registered in the name of DTC or its nominee, notice of any defeasance of Bonds shall be given to DTC in the manner prescribed in the Letter of , Representations for notices of redemption of Bonds. 10 LTGO Bonds, 2006 SECTION 14. - Bond Fund and Deposit of Bond Proceeds. There is created _and established in thq,office of the City Finance Director a special fund designated as the Limited Tax General Obligation Bond Fund, 2006 (the "Bond Fund', for the purpose of paying principal of and interest [and any tail premium] on the Bonds. Accrued interest on the Bonds, if any, received from the sale and delivery of the Bonds shall be paid into the Bond Fund. All taxes collected for and allocated to the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be deposited in the Bond Fund. There also is created and established in the office of the City Finance Director a special fund designated as the Fund, 2006, (the "Project Fund'. The principal proceeds [and premium, if any,] received from the sale and delivery of the Bonds shall be paid into the Project Fund and used for the purposes specified in Section 2 of this ordinance. Until needed to pay the costs of the Project and costs of issuance of the Bonds, the City may invest principal proceeds temporarily in any legal investment, and the investment earnings may be retained in the Project Fund and be spent for the purposes of that fund except that earnings subject to a federal tax or rebate requirement may be withdrawn from the Project Fund and used for those tax or rebate purposes. SECTION 15. - Approua/ of Bond Purchase Agreement. Banc of America Securities LLC of Seattle, Washington, has presented a purchase agreement (the "Bond Purchase Agreement') to the City offering to purchase the Bonds under the terms and conditions provided in the Bond Purchase Agreement, which written Bond Purchase Agreement is on file with the City Finance Director and is incorporated herein by this reference. The City Council finds that entering into the Bond Purchase Agreement is in the City's best interest and therefore accepts the offer contained therein and authorizes its execution by City officials. The Bonds will be printed at City expense and will be delivered to the purchaser in accordance with the Bond Purchase Agreement, with the approving legal opinion of Foster Pepper & Shefelman PLLC, municipal bond counsel of Seattle, Washington, regarding the Bonds. 11 L TGO Bonds, 2006 The proper City officials are authorized and directed to do everything necessary for the prompt delivery of the Bonds to the purchaser and for the proper application and use of the proceeds of the sale thereof. SECTION.1 — Pre/iminary Ofcia/ Statement Deemed Final.. The City Council has been provided with copies of a preliminary official statement dated 2005 (the "Preliminary Official Statement'), prepared in connection with the sale of the Bonds. For the sole purpose of the Bond purchaser's compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12(b)(1), the City "deems final" that Preliminary Official Statement as of its date, except for the omission of information as to offering prices, interest rates, selling compensation, aggregate principal amount, principal amount per maturity, maturity dates, options of redemption, delivery dates, ratings and other terms of the Bonds dependent on such matters. SECTION 17. — Undertaking to Provide Continuino Disclosure. To meet the requirements of United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC'S Rule 15c2-12(b)(5) (the "Rule', as applicable to a participating underwriter for the Bonds, the City makes the following written undertaking (the "Undertaking") for the benefit of holders of the Bonds: (a) Undertaking to Provide Annual Financial Information and Notice of Material Events. The City undertakes to provide or cause to be provided, either directly or through a designated agent: (i) To each nationally recognized municipal securities information repository designated by the SEC in accordance with the Rule ("NRMSIR'� and to a state information depository, if any, established in the State of Washington (the "SID") annual financial information and operating data of the type included in the final official statement for the Bonds and described in subsection (b) of this section ("annual financial information'); (u) To each NRMSIR or the Municipal Securities Rulemakmg Board ("MSRB'% and to the SID, timely notice of the occurrence of any of the following events with respect to the Bonds, if material: (1) principal and interest payment delinquencies; (2) non- payment related defaults; (3) unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; (4) unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; (5) substitution of 12 L TGO Bonds, 2006 credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; (6) adverse tax opinions or events affecting the tax-exempt status of the Bonds; (7) modifications to rights of holders of the Bonds; (8) Bond calls (other than scheduled mandatory redemptions of Term Bonds); (9) defeasances; (10) release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the Bonds; and (11) rating changes; and (iii) To each NRMSIR or to the MSRB, and to the SID, timely notice of a failure by the City to provide required annual financial information on or before the date specified in subsection (b) of this section. (b) Type of Annual Financial Information Undertaken to be Provided. The annual financial information that the City undertakes to provide in subsection (a) of this section: (i) Shall consist of (1) annual financial statements prepared (except as noted in the financial statements) in accordance with applicable generally accepted accounting principles applicable to governmental units, as such principles may be changed from time to time and as permitted by State law, which statements shall not be audited, except, however, that if and when audited financial statements are otherwise prepared and available to the City they will be provided; (2) authorized, issued and outstanding balance of general obligation bonds; (3) assessed valuation for the fiscal year; and (4) regular property tax levy rate and regular property tax levy rate limit ' for the fiscal year; (ii) Shall be provided to each NRMSIR and the SID, not later than the last day of the ninth month after the end of each fiscal year of the City (currently, a fiscal year ending December 31), as such fiscal year may be changed as required or permitted by State law, commencing with the City's fiscal year ending December 31, 2006; and (m) May be provided in a single or multiple documents, and may be incorporated by reference to other documents that have been filed with each NRMSIR and the SID, or, if the document incorporated by reference is a "final official statement" with respect to other obligations of the City, that has been filed with the MSRB. (c) Amendment of Undertaking. The Undertaking is subject to amendment after the primary offering of the Bonds without the consent of any holder of any Bond, or of any broker, dealer, municipal securities dealer, participating underwriter, rating agency, NRMSIR, the ' SID or the MSRB, under the circumstances and in the manner permitted by the Rule. 13 L TGO Bonds, 2006 The City will give notice to each NRMSIR or the MSRB, and the SID, of the substance (or provide a copy) of any amendment to the Undertaking and a brief statement of the reasons for the amendment. If the amendment changes the type of annual financial information to be provided, the annual financial information containing the amended financial information will include a narrative explanation of the effect of that change on the type of information to be provided. (d) Beneficiaries. The Undertaking evidenced by this section shall inure to the benefit of the City and any holder of Bonds, and shall not inure to the benefit of or create any rights in any other person. (e) Termination of Undertaking. The City's obligations under this Undertaking shall terminate upon the legal defeasance of all of the Bonds. In addition, the City's obligations under this Undertaking shall terminate if those provisions of the Rule which require the City to comply with this Undertaking become legally inapplicable in respect of the Bonds for any reason, as confirmed by an opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel or other counsel familiar with federal securities laws delivered to the City, and the City provides timely notice of such termination to each NRMSIR or the MSRB and the SID. (f) Remedy for Failure to Comply with Undertaking. As soon as practicable after the City learns of any failure to comply with the Undertaking, the City will proceed with due diligence to cause such noncompliance to be corrected. No failure by the City or other ' obligated person to comply with the Undertaking shall constitute a default in respect of the Bonds. The sole remedy of any holder of a Bond shall be to take such actions as that holder deems necessary, including seeking an order of specific performance from an appropriate court, to compel the City or other obligated person to comply with the Undertaking. (g) Designation of Official Responsible to Administer Undertaking. The Finance Director of the City (or such other officer of the City who may in the future perform the duties of that office) or his or her designee is authorized and directed in his or her discretion to take such further actions as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to carry out the Undertaking of the City in respect of the Bonds set forth in this section and in accordance with the Rule, including, without limitation, the following actions: (i) Preparing and filing the annual financial information undertaken to be provided; (ii) Determining whether any event specified in subsection (a) has occurred, assessing its materiality with respect to 14 L TGO Bonds, 2005 ' the Bonds, and, if material, preparing and disseminating notice of its occurrence; ' (iii) Determining whether any person other than the City is an 'obligated person" within the meaning of the Rule with respect to the Bonds, and obtaining from such person an undertaking to provide any annual financial information and notice of material events for that person in accordance with the Rule; (iv) Selecting, engaging and compensating designated agents and consultants, including but not limited to ' financial advisors and legal counsel, to assist and advise the City in carrying out the Undertaking; and ' (v) Effecting any necessary amendment of the Undertaking. (h) Centralized Dissemination Agent. To the extent authorized by the SEC, the City may satisfy the Undertaking by transmitting the required filings using http://www.disclosureusa.org (or such other centralized dissemination agent as may be approved by the SEC). ' SECTION 16 — Bond Insurance. [To be completed upon selection of Bond ' Insurer.]. — Effective Date of Ordinance This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage and five days following its publication as required by ' law. 15 ' I TGO Bonds, 2006 JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK ' APPROVED AS TO FORM: ' FOSTER PEPPER & SHEFELMAN PLLC Special Counsel and Bond Counsel PASSED: day of December, 2005. APPROVED: day of December, 2005. PUBLISHED: day of December, 2005. 1 16 L TGO Bonds, 2006 t ' CERTIFICATION ' I, the undersigned, City C-erk of the City of Kent, Washington (the "City'7, hereby certify as follows: 1. The attached copy of Ordinance No. (the "Ordinance') is a full, true and correct copy of an ordinance duly passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City held at the regular meeting place thereof on December 13, 2005, as that ordinance appears on the minute book of the City; and the Ordinance will be in full force and effect five days after publication in the City's official newspaper; and ' 2. A quorum of the members of the City Council was present throughout the meeting and a majority of those members present voted in the proper manner for the passage of the Ordinance. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 13th day of December, 2005. CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON Brenda Jacober, City Clerk Kent City Council Meeting _ +_ Date December 13, 2005 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: HOME STREET BANK DONATION TO FIRE DEPARTMENT — ACCEPT ' 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept the donation from Home Street Bank's Corporate Giving Program in the amount of$3,000. This donation will enable the Fire Department to continue to provide fall prevention/ risk reduction equipment to the citizens in our community at no cost and to assist with providing professional counseling to juveniles, who after being interviewed by a Fire Department Juvenile Firestopper Interventionist, are determined to require additional professional assistance. These monies will be placed in a project account which will enable us to carry funds from year to year. 3. EXHIBITS: None 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee 12/17/05 (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? Revenue? X Currently in the Budget? Yes No X If no: Unbudgeted Expense: Fund V00030.6XXX.2950 Amount $3,000 00 Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund V00030.56710 2950 Amount $3,000.00 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ' Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ' ACTION: Council Agenda ' Item No 6H Kent City Council Meeting Date December 13, 2005 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: WASHINGTON TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION"DOTS" MINI- GRANT— AUTHORIZE AND ACCEPT ' 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept the grant from the Washington Traffic Safety Commission for $4,000. This grant will provide supplemental overtime funding for DUI enforcement in the I Kent Police Department. This WTSC campaign began on October 1, 2005 and runs through September 30, 2006. Kent Police will use these funds to provide periodic DUI emphasis on certain occasions, such as St. Patrick's Day, Cinco-de-Mayo, Memorial Day and Labor Day. 3. EXHIBITS: Copy of MOU with WTSC 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee 11/17/05 (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A iCurrently in the Budget? Yes X No If no: Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund Amount $ 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION- Council Agenda Item No. 61 POLICE DEPARTMENT Ed Crawford, Chief of Police • Phone 253-856-5888 K EN T Fax. 253-856-6802 Address 220 Fourth Avenue S ' Kent,WA 98032-5895 DATE: November 17, 2005 TO: Public Safety Committee FROM: Chief Ed Crawford SUBJECT: Washington Traffic Safety Commission"DOTS 2006" mini-grant MOTION: I move to recommend authorization of the application and placing the acceptance of the Washington Traffic Safety Commission nnni-grant in the amount of$4,000 00, on the Consent Calendar for the December 13, 2005 Council Meeting. SUMMARY: This grant will provide supplemental overtime funding for DUI enforcement. This I includes periodic DUI emphasis such as St. Patrick's Day, Cinco-de-Mayor, Memorial Day and Labor Day. This DUI campaign began on October 1, 2005 and runs through September 30, 2006. EXHIBITS: Copy of Memorandum of Understanding with WTSC. BUDGET IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The goals of this program are to save lives and prevent serious injuries on Washington's roadways by decreasing the number of DUI drivers. The WTSC w ill purchase media spots that will air to promote the program and to attempt to educate motorists. This federal funding is only being offered to county task forces and Kent Police Department has been asked to participate through the task force coordinator. We anticipate submitting reimbursement for up to $4,000.00, as we have in the past under similar grants. Kent City Council WTSC grant—Di II November 17,2005 AanCcf /J72�/1/C J 6 STATt G �tj DA'�"F1. u 4 + wT 2 Q ' MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WASHINGTON TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION 1 THIS AGREEMENT, pursuant to Chapter 39.34 RCW is made and entered into by and between the Kent Police Department (KPD) and the Washington Traffic Safety Commission (WTSC). IT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS AGREEMENT to assist WTSC in a project titled: "DUI TRAFFIC SAFETY EMPHASIS PATROL ACTIVITY (DOTS 2006)" TERM: 1 October 2005 to 30 September 2006 ' IT IS, THEREFORE, MUTUALLY AGREED THAT: 1. The King County Traffic Safety Coalition (KCTSC) has agreed to provide evaluations and planned activity for your on-going DUI traffic safety emphasis patrols. 2. KCTSC has also submitted a budget not to exceed $60,000.00. ' 3. KPD has agreed to participate in DUI traffic safety emphasis patrols (DOTS 2006) with other law enforcement agencies in King County as organized by the KCTSTF. 4. WTSC has provided written approval of the enforcement plan and budget. Funds are available for activities beginning October 1, 2005. ' 5. KPD must submit claims for reimbursement in a timely manner (not to exceed 60 days past the emphasis patrol being billed). All claims for reimbursement must be received by the WTSC no later than October 15, 2006. Any request for reimbursement received after October 15, 2006 may not be honored by the WTSC. Claims for reimbursement must include: ♦ Invoice Voucher, A19-IA Form (attached) Please note that we cannot accept a FAX. Identify your agency as the "claimant" and provide a federal tax ID#, and an original signature of the agency head, command officer, or contracting officer on the form; and ♦ Payroll support documents (signed overtime slips, payroll documents, etc.) and ♦ A copy of the activity log indicating a minimum of 3 contacts per hour by the officer claiming overtime. 6. Disputes arising under this agreement shall be resolved by a panel consisting ' of one representative of the WTSC, one representative from the KPD and an agreed upon third party. The dispute panel shall decide the dispute by majority vote. ' 7. Either party may terminate this agreement upon (30) days written notice to the other party.- In the:- event of-termination of this agreement, the terminating party shall be liable for the performance rendered prior to the effective date of termination. 8. I certify that none of the funds for this project supplant the normally budgeted funds of this agency nor do these funds pay for routine traffic enforcement normally provided by this agency. ' 9. I certify that my agency supports SFST training for all of its officers that take part in DUI emphasis patrols for the WTSC. By June 30, 2006, only SFST , trained officers in my agency will receive overtime money from WTSC for DUI emphasis patrols. IN WITNESS THEREOF, THE PARTIES HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT. Contracting Agency (Name) Date/Washington Traffic Safety Commission Return To: Deanne Boisvert Date/Signature PH-SKC, Injury Prevention 999 Third Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98104-4041 Kent City Council Meeting 1 Date December 13, 2005 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: WASHINGTON TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION `DRIVE HAMMERED — GET NAILED" MINI-GRANT— AUTHORIZE AND ACCEPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept this grant from the Washington Traffic Safety Commission in the amount of$3,500. ' This grant will provide supplemental overtime funding for DUI enforcement by the Kent Police Department. This DUI campaign, "Drive Hammered— Get Nailed," began on November 17, 2005 and runs through January 2, 2006. 3. EXHIBITS: Letter dated 10/21/05 from WTSC and copy of MOU with WTSC ' 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee 11/17/05 (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) L5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes X No If no: Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund Amount $ 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6.1 POLICE DEPARTMENT Ed Crawford, Chief of Police • Phone 253-856-5888 KENT Fax 253-856-6802 Address 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent,WA 98032-5895 tDATE: November 17, 2005 TO: Public Safety Committee FROM: Chief Ed Crawford SUBJECT: Washington Traffic Safety Commission"Drive Hammered—Get Nailed" mini-grant MOTION: I move to recommend authorization of the application and placing the acceptance of the Washington Traffic Safety Commission mIm-grant in the amount of S3,500 00 on the Consent Calendar for the December 13, 2005 Council Meeting SUMMARY: This grant will provide supplemental overtime funding for DUI enforcement. This DUI campaign, "Drive Hammered— Get Nailed", will begin on November 17, 2005 and run through January 2, 2006. EXHIBITS: Copy of Memorandum of Understanding with WTSC Letter dated October 21, 2005 from WTSC BUDGET IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The goals of this program are to save lives and prevent serious injuries on Washington's roadways by removing impaired drivers from our roadways. The WTSC will purchase media spots that will air before the enforcement begins and throughout the campaign to promote the program and to attempt to educate motorists. This federal funding is only being offered to county task forces and Kent Police Department has been asked to participate through the task force coordinator We anticipate submitting reimbursement for up to $3,500 00, as we have in the past under similar grants ' Kent City Council WTSC grant—drive hammered2005 November 17.2005 4 F ttnrt P' = x u. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WASHINGTON TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION 1000 So. Cherry St., PO Box 40944,Olympia, WA 98504-0944 ITHIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between, KENT POLICE DEPART14ENT (insert agency name above) Hereinafter referred to as "Contractor" and the WASHINGTON TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION, hereinafter referred to as"WTSC". IT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS AGREEMENT to provide overtime funding to law enforcement agencies to conduct "Drive Hammered— Get Nailed DUI Emphasis Patrols" during the period between November 21, 2005 and January 2, 2006 in cooperation with the local traffic safety task force. The goal of this project is to contact as many DUI violators as Ipossible. IT IS, THEREFORE, MUTUALLY AGREED THAT: 1. Contractor will provide commissioned police officer(s) (active or paid reserve) with appropriate equipment (vehicle, radar, etc) on an overtime" basis (not to exceed 1.5 times normal salary) to enforce DUI laws. No on-duty personnel will be funded 2. The period of activity will begin on November 2, 2005 and extend through January 2, 2006 Funding is not available for activity before or after this period and funding may not exceed the amount prescribed by the county traffic safety task force coordinator. 3. Performance standards for funded personnel are a minimum of three (3) self-initiated contacts per hour. This is an enforcement activity to find impaired drivers. It is expected that a Citation or Notices of Infraction (NOI's) will be issued at contact unless circumstances dictate otherwise. It is understood that violator contacts may result in related, time-consuming activity. Such activity will be considered for reimbursement. Activity other than that initiated through emphasis patrol contact (investigating collisions, emergency responses, etc) will be the responsibility of the contracting agency and may not be considered for reimbursement. 4. Contractor must submit for reimbursement not later than February 17, 2006. Billings will include: ♦ Invoice Voucher, A19-1A Form (attached) Please note that we cannot accept a FAX. WTSC must have your agency identified as the "Claimant", a Federal Tax ID # and an original signature of the agency head, command officer or contracting officer on the A- 19 form. ♦ Payroll support documents (overtime slips, payroll documents, etc) ♦ Officer worksheets (showing 3 or more self-initiated contacts per hour) ♦ Total sheet tallying officer Activity Logs for entire enforcement period. 5. Disputes arising under this agreement shall be resolved by a panel consisting of one representative of the Washington Traffic Safety Commission, one representative from your agency and a mutually agreed upon third party. The dispute panel shall thereafter decide the dispute with the majority prevailing 6. Either party may terminate this agreement upon (30) days written notice to the other party. In the event of termination of this agreerent, the terminating party shall be liable for the performance rendered pnor to the effective date of termination. (over) By signing this Memorandum of Understanding I am certifying that: ❑ None of the funds for this project supplant the normally budgeted funds of this agency nor do these funds pay for routine traffic enforcement normally provided by this agency. ❑ My agency supports Standardized Field Sobriety Testing training for all of its officers that take part in DUI emphasis patrols for the WTSC. And I acknowledge that after June 30, 2006 only SFST trained officers in my agency will receive overtime money from WTSC for DUI emphasis patrols. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, PARTIES HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT. ' APPROVED/DISAPPROVED Washington Traffic Safety Commission KENT POLICE DEPARTMENT Agency , ED CRAWFORD, CHIEF OF POLICE Contr in Agent "nt/t pe Name) � � f 0 ��� Signature Date Return this signed MOU to Your County Task Force Coordinator 1 I October 21, 2005 TO: DUI/Traffic Safety Task Forces Task Force Law Enforcement Agencies FROM: Angie Ward, Program Manager (360) 753-0877, award(ai)wtsc.wa.gov RE: Overtime Funding for "Drive Hammered-Get Nailed" Enforcement Campaign The Washington Traffic Safety Commission (WTSC) will be coordinating holiday"Drive Hammered—Get Nailed" DUI mobilization As most of you know by now, the concept is simple. It starts with a statewide public mformation effort to educate motorists about the upcoming DUl enforcement campaign and is followed up with an uitensive period of increased enforcement throughout the holiday period. The \k7SC will be spending money on paid radio spots, containing a clear message about the coming enforcement. These spots will air in both the weeks before and throughout the mobilization. tAs an integral part of this mobilization, the WTSC is pleased to announce the availability of rant funds for"Drive Hammered—Get Nailed Emphasis Patrols." The enforcement activity will begin on November 21, 2005 and rim through January 2, 2006. The goal of this federal rant is to save Yves and prevent serious inlur►es on Washington's roadways by removing unpaired drivers from our roadways. This mobilization is being coordinated through Washington's Traffic Safety Task Forces. The application for funding, post-mobilization statistics, and requests for reimbursement will all be channeled through vour local task force office. Funding for this mobilization will be awarded based on the following criteria: • Preference should be given to officers that have the current SFST training (remember,beginnnig July I, 2006, to be eligible for overture funding, officers must have the current SFST training), • DUI emphasis patrols must take place during peak hours when impaired drivers are on the road: and • Performance on previous WTSC overtime grants. It is our intent to award funding to every agency that applies. Should requests for funding exceed our ability to fund theta. the above criteria will be used to prioritize the requests. 1) Eligibility— All state, county, local and tribal law enforcement agencies within a current WTSC funded task force are eligible and encouraged to participate in this campaign. The use of commissioned reserve officers is approved as long as a pay structure exists. Funding availability is on a first-come basis. The following -,erves as a guideline for overtime requests. Task Force Coordinators have the authority to approve adjustments to this guideline in order to maximize activity under the grant. #of Commissioned Officers May request funding up to: 1-10 $1,000 11-25 $1,500 26-50 $2,000 51-100 $2,500 101 + $3,500 2) Funding Guidelines- Funding will be on a "remnbuisemenf'basis and requires the submission of a State ' invoice voucher(Form A-19—attached) upon completion of activity. Support documents for reimbursement must include signed overtime slips or payroll/expense records showing payments made, officer activity logs demonstrating peilormance, and a combined activity log totaling all officer activity logs for the mobilization. • Performance standards for funded personnel are a minimum of three(3) self- initiated contacts per hour funded with a "desired outcome" of DUI arrests. It is understood that violator contacts may result in related tune-consuming activity. Such activity will be considered for reimbursement. Activity_ other than that initiated through emphasis patrol contact (investigating collisions, emergency responses, etc) will be the responsibility of the contracting agency and may not be considered for rermburseuient. • Allowable use off tirds will be for overtime salary ((a? 1.5 times normal rate), and wages and benefits of commissioned personnel in direct support of operational activity. No equipment purchases are authorized. 3) Application for Funds— Application for funding must be submitted by the task force coordinator and received by the WTSC no later than November 18, 2005. The application must include the following elements: a. A grant letter requesting overtime funding. The letter must contain the following elements and be submitted by the task force coordinator on behalf of the law enforcement agencies involved: 1 • A schedule of planned enforcement dates during the November 21 —January 2, 2006 Mobilization(dates may be changed later due to operational requirements) and the number of personnel committed to each date; • The amount of funds requested per agency(may be adjusted within the total grant amount); • The designation of a single "point of contact' for the purposes of the project management, administration and activity reporting; • The designation of a single "point of contact' for media and public education purposes (May be the same as the project manager); and + Information addressing the three qualifying criteria listed above (optional, but this information might increase your chances for funding if we need to prioritize grantees). b. A signed Memorandum of Understanding for each agency listed in the letter (MOU - attached). 4) Funding Approval— A copy of the approved MOU will be returned to your agency prior to planned activity. tS)RehubursementlReportiug- To receive reimbursement, the following must be submitted to your local task force coordinator no later than February 17,2006. • A Completed Invoice Voucher, A 19-1 A Form(attached) Please note that we cannot accept a FAX. We must have your agency identified as the "Claimant', a Federal Tax 10#and an ordinal signature of the agency head,command officer or contracting officer on the A-19 form. • Payroll support documents Such as signed overtime slips or payroll/expense records or personnel report showing rate of pay or payments made. • Activity logs for each officer and a combined activity log with totals for the entire mobilization. 6) Contact Information/Questions- Please contact your task force coordinator if you have questions. You can also contact me at (360) 753-0877 or award6t)wtsc .N a Qov . Attachments: Memorandum of Understanding Activity Lou Combined Activity Log A-19 Invoice Voucher(for use at time of billing) Kent City Council Meeting Date_ December 13, 2005 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: SOROPTIMIST CLUB DONATION FOR SERVICE CLUB PARK— ACCEPT AND AMEND BUDGET 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept the donation of$10,000 from Soroptimist International of Kent for development of the Service Club Park, and authorize the expenditure of funds in the Service Club Park budget. The $10,000 from Soroptimist International of Kent is a partial payment from the original pledges of$35,000 in 1999 from local service clubs to support the construction of Service Club Park To recognize their contributions, play fields will be named for each club. The park is currently under construction 3. EXHIBITS: Revenue report 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Parks and Human Services Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? X Revenue? -X Currently in the Budget? Yes X No If no: Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund Amount $ 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6K R55GA006 City of Kent 10120/2005 Page 1 Journal Entry/Budget Change Doc M 35331 -- -"'"" Ledger Type: AA Journal Entry - Doc Type: JR Batch#: 63481 Explanation: PP&D#205 Service Club Park GIL Date: 1012012011 Automatic Reversal? No Created by: JBROOM Last Changed by: JBROOM Line# B Unit Object SubsidiarySubledger _Debit Amount Credit Amount Account Explanation Reference 10 P20024 56710 10,000 00- Soroptimist Donation 20 1 11110 0010 10,000 00 Soroptimist Donation Journal Entry Totals: 00,000 00 10,000.00- 1 I have reviewed this journal entry for accuracy, validity and appropriateness It is a true representation of transactions incurred while conducting City business Appropriate supporting documentation is attached Dept -Authorized by: Finance-Reviewed by: Kent City Council Meeting Date__December 13, 2005 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: INDIGENT COUNSEL CONTRACT—AUTHORIZE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorize the Mayor to enter into an agreement with Stewart, Beall and McNichols for indigent counsel services. tThe City is required by statute to provide indigent counsel services to individuals unable to afford legal representation when charged with a crime in Kent Municipal Court The City currently contracts with Stewart, Beall and McNichols for these services. Staff recommends continuing to contract with this firm for the next three years. 3. EXHIBITS: Indigent Counsel Services Agreement 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Parks and Human Services Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? X Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes X No If no: Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgetcd Revenue Fund Amount $ 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda IItem No 6L W 5 11 Np OH AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES (January 1,2006 through December 31,2008) THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by and between the CITY OF KENT,a Washington municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City," and STEWART BEALL & MacNICHOLS, P.S.,a Washington professional services corporation(which may subsequent to the execution of this Agreement convert to a limited liability company), hereinafter referred to as "Attorney." In consideration of the mutual agreements and covenants set forth in this Agreement, the parties agree as follows: 1. Scope of Services. The Attorney agrees to provide public defender services for indigent defendants charged in the Kent Municipal Court with all violations of the Kent City Code C'KCC'l that result in misdemeanor charges,whether those charges are based on the city's criminal code or civil code sections,under the terms set forth in this Agreement. All indigent defendants charged with committing a misdemeanor offense under the KCC who qualify for appointed counsel,whether they are screened or appointed by the court,shall be referred to the Attorney. The Attorney shall enter a Notice of Appearance and provide legal Irepresentation for each of these defendants from the time of receiving notice or an order of appointment through arraignment, if appropriate,pretrial hearings, trial, sentencing, review hearings, revocation hearings, and appeals, unless and until the Attorney is permitted to withdraw by the court. 2. Number of Attorneys. The Attorney will provide an adequate number of defense counsel to efficiently manage each court calendar in a manner that avoids unnecessary delay and sufficient representation for all assigned clients in completing each calendar. In any event, the Attorney will provide at least one defense counsel per court calendar. The Attorney shall ensure that multiple defense counsel are present whenever the court's caseload necessitates the presence of more than one attorney to effectively and efficiently manage the calendar. As a guideline, the Attorney shall endeavor to meet the following levels of representation for court calendars: AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES- 1 (September 1,2003-December 31,2005) a. Less than thirty (30) assigned defendants at a pretrial or jury call calendar, at least one (1) attorney shall be present for the full calendar; b. Thirty (30) or more assigned defendants at a pretrial or jury call calendar, at least two (2) attorneys shall be present for the full calendar. Sufficient counsel shall be provided to represent defendants during the vacation and 1 illness of attorneys and calendars that occur simultaneously in more than one courtroom. 3. Defendant's Access to Attornev. The Attorney shall be available to clients represented by the Attorney to ensure that clients are provided with the assistance of their attorney as required by state and federal law. The parties agree that client access to the Attorney prior to appearance in court is paramount. All defendants represented by the Attorney shall be provided access to the Attorney by means of a toll-free local call from a Kent telephone number made available by the Attorney. The Attorney currently maintains offices at 655 W. Smith Street,Suite 210, Kent,Washington,and will, at all times during the term of this Agreement, maintain an office at such location or in South King County at a location to facilitate client access for purposes of providing the services required in this Agreement. The Attorney shall meet with all in-custody clients at the Kent Corrections Facility ("KCF' within 48 hours of notification of appointment, excluding weekends and holidays. The Attorney will appear at the KCF to consult with clients as necessary. In addition to regularly scheduled court hearings held at the KCF,a representative of the Attorney shall, at a minimum, appear at the KCF at least two times each week for a minimum of one hour per visit to meet with incarcerated clients and respondto requests submitted by those clients. Clients that are incarcerated in the KCF who wish to call the Attorney may, during predetermined times designated by the Attorney, call the Attorney's toll-free telephone number either to leave a message with the Attorney or to speak with the Attorney. The Attorney shall see all in-custody clients at the King County Regional Justice Center within a reasonable period of time following notice of appointment and further shall see such clients j in follow-up meetings as necessary. AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES - 2 (Januaryl, 2006-December 31,2008) 4. Applicant Screening Determinations of indigency for purposes of eligibility for appointed cour!sel under this Agreement shall be made by an independent screening process established by the court and by direct appointments from the court. Such appointment shall be in accordance with state law. Should the Attorney determine a defendant is not eligible for assigned counsel prior to the establishment of the attorney/client relationship, the Attorney shall promptly advise the court to reconsider the eligibility of that defendant. The court's determination of indigency shall be final and binding upon Attorney. 5. 24-Hour Telephone Access. The Attorney shall provide to the City's police 1 departmentthe telephone number or numbers atwhich the Attorney can be reached twenty- four hours each day for "critical stage" advice to defendants during the course of police investigations and/or arrest. Such telephone numbers shall be serviced by a telephone paging device or other similar monitoring method so that direct contact can be made with an attorney at any time of the day or night, seven days a week. 6. Attorney Employees or Associated Counsel. Any counsel associated with or employed by the Attorney shall have the authority and qualifications to perform the services called for herein, and the Attorney may employ and/or associate counsel to assist the Attorney at the Attorney's expense. The Attorney and all counsel employed or associated pursuant to this section shall be admitted to the practice of law in the state of Washington and be in good standing as such, pursuant to the rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Washington. The Attorney shall be responsible for performance of this Agreement, notwithstanding that other counsel may be employed or associated by the Attorney to perform services hereunder. The Attorney shall actively supervise associated and employed counsel throughout the term of this Agreement,and any renewals hereof, to ensure that all cases are promptly and effectively handled from the time of appointment until conclusion of the Attorney's representation of the client. I The Attorney shall notify the City of any proposed association or employment of counsel for purposes of performing the services called for herein, and shall include in such notification information regarding the background, education, training, experience, and AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES - 3 (Januaryl, 2006-December 31, 2006) r qualifications of such counsel and any additional training and supervision that is proposed to be provided to such associated or employed counsel for purposes of performing the services called for herein. The Attorney shall be responsible for providing all such training and/or supervision at the Attorneys sole cost and expense. No Rule 9 qualified or other legal intern shall perform the services called for herein without the prior approval of the City. 7. Term of this Agreement. This Agreement shall commence on the ist day of January, 2006, and shall be in force and effect through December 31, 2008, unless terminated earlier pursuant to the provisions in this Agreement. At the commencement of t this Agreement, all other agreements between the parties shall be superceded and shall be null and void. 8. Proof of Professional Liability Insurance. The Attorney shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the j work hereunder by the Attorney, its agents, representatives, and employees. Before beginning work on the project described in this Agreement,the Attorney shall provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing: 1. Commercial General Liability insurance written on an occurrence basis with limits no less than$1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence and $2,000,000 general aggregate for personal injury, bodily injury and property damage. Coverage shall include but not be limited to: completed operations; employer's liability; and coverage for hired and non-owned motor vehicles; and 2. Professional Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 limit per occurrence. 3. Automobile Liabilitvinsurance with limits no less than required by law. In the event that the Attorney does not provide automobile insurance to its individual employees, the Attorney shall ensure that each of its employees carries automobile insurance in the above amounts at all times during the term of this Agreement. Any payment of deductible or self-insured retention shall be the sole responsibility of the Attorney. AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES -4 (Januaryl,2006—December 31,2008) All required policies shall be provided on an"occurrence"basis except professional_ liability insurance (if required), which shall be provided m a "claims-made" basis. _ The City shall be named as an additional insured on the Commercial General Liability insurance policy, as respects work performed by or on behalf of the Attorney and a copy of the endorsement naming the City as additional insured shall be attached to the Certificate of Insurance. The City reserves the right to receive a certified copy of all the required insurance policies. The Attorney's Commercial General Liability insurance shall contain a clause stating that coverage shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respects to the limits of the insurer's liability. The Attorney's insurance shall be primary insurance as respects the City and the City shall be given thirty(30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, of any cancellation, suspension or material change in coverage. The City also reserves its unqualified right to require at any time and for any reason, proof of coverage in the form of a duplicate of the insurance policy with all endorsements as evidence of coverage. 4. Indemnification. The Attorney shall indemnify,defend,and hold the City,its elected officials, officers, and employees harmless from any and all claims whatsoever related to or arising from the performance of the Attorney's obligations pursuant to this Agreement, including but not limited to claims arising out of the errors and omissions of the Attorney relating to the representation or lack of representation of clients, and/or by reason of accident, injury, or death caused to any persons or property of any kind occurring during the performance or lack thereof of the work required by this Agreement, or traveling to or from any place to perform the work required by this Agreement, except to the extent they tare caused by the negligence of the City. The failure of the Attorney to carry insurance in a quantity sufficient to defend a claim or lawsuit or cover any judgment that results shall not operate to limit the Attorney's indemnification or defense of the City. This indemnification section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES - 5 (Ianuaryl, 2006-December 31,2003) 10. Nondiscrimination. In the hiring of employees for the performance of work under thisAgreement, the Attorney, or any person acting on behalf of such, shall not, by reason of race, religion, color, sex, national origin, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability, discriminate against any person who is qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates. Attorney shall execute the attached City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Policy Declaration, Comply with City Administrative Policy 1.2, and upon completion of the contract work, file the attached Compliance Staterient. 11. Compensation. a. Payment for Services The City shall pay the Attorney for services rendered under this Agreement as follows: The City shall provide to Attorney for services rendered under this Agreement and for the three-year term of this Agreement, the sum of TWO HUNDRED SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND FORTY DOLLARS($275,040) per year,to be paid at the rate of TWENTY-TWO THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED TWENTY DOLLARS ($22,920) per month. This amount will be raised annually, on the first day of each calendar year, by an amount equal to 9011/o of the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index for Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton (All Urban Consumers)for the previous calendar year(the"CPI's. Attorney shall bill the City each month for services rendered herein. In the event this Agreement isterminated pursuant to the provisions set forth in this Agreement, the Attorney's compensation shall be prorated based upon the number of months and portions of months which have elapsed between the commencement of the year and the effective date of termination. b. Appeals The Attorney shall handle appeals taken by indigent defendants, regardless of whether the Attorney represented said defendant at trial. This service is to be included within the Scope of Services described in Section 1 of this Agreement and the Compensation provided for in Section 11(a) above. AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES -6 (Januaryl,2006-December 31, 2008) C. Miscellaneous Costs The City agrees to reimburse the Attorney for all rwsonable costs associated with obtaining and transcribing trial court records for appeal z = purposes if such costs have not been waived. d. Billing. The Attorney shall bill the City, in care of the City's human services office, on the first day of the month, or the first workday thereafter: (i) for the monthly installment set forth in subsection 11(a) above; and (ii) for all costs incurred by the Attorney under subsection 11(c) above for the previous month or months. In addition to the reporting requirements of Section 17 of this Agreement,the Attorney shall submit with the monthly bill, a report that sets forth the number of cases to which the Attorney was appointed. The submission of the report with the monthly bill is a condition of payment under this Agreement. The City shall make payments on or before the 20`h day of the month following the month for which services were rendered; provided,that any billing not received by the City's human services office on or before the fourth working day of the month shall not be due and payable until the City's next billing period. 12. DiscoveEy Provided. The City shall provide Attorney one (1) copy of all discoverable material concerning each assigned case. 13. No Assignments or Subcontracts. No assignment or transfer of this Agreement nor of any interest in this Agreement shall be made by either of the parties, without prior written consent of the non-assigning party. 14. Attorney Conflict. In the event the representation of a defendant hereunder raises a conflict of interest such that the Attorney cannot represent the defendant, said defendant shall be promptly referred to the Kent Municipal Court for further assignment. 15. Termination. ■ a. For Cause. The City or the Attorney may terminate this Agreement immediately in the event the other party breaches the Agreement and such breach is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of the injured party in a timely manner after notice AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES- 7 (Januaryl, 2J06—December 31,2008) of breach has been provided to the other party. Each and every term of this Agreement is material. The failure of any party to comply with any term of this Agreement shall be in breach of this Agreement. b. For Reasons Beyond Control of Parties. Either party may terminate this Agreement without recourse by the other where performance is rendered impossible or impracticable for reasons beyond such party's reasonable control such as but not limited to acts of nature; war or warlike operations; civil commotion; riot; labor dispute including strike, walkout, or lockout; sabotage; or superior governmental regulation or control. C. Without Cause. Either party may terminate this Agreement at any time with or without cause upon giving the non-terminating party not less than ninety (90) days prior written notice. 16. Agreement Applicable to All Employees and Volunteers. The terms of this Agreement shall apply to all persons who are employed by, or who volunteer for, the Attorney, including but not limited to attorneys, interns, paralegals, office assistants, secretaries, and investigators. 17. Reports. At the end of every quarter during the term of this Agreement, Attorney shall provide the City a full accounting of all cases assigned and all in-court appointments made during that three-month period, segregated for each month. These itemized quarterly reports to the City shall contain the number of cases to which the Attorney was appointed, a breakdown of the number and types of all charges to which the Attorney was appointed and a list of cases in which a notice of appeal was filed. Such reports shall be submitted to the City within ten (10) calendar days from the end of each quarter. The Attorney shall have the option of submitting monthly reports containing the same information in lieu of quarterly reports. 18. Status of Attorney. This Agreement calls for the performance of the services of the Attorney as an independent contractor and Attorney will not be considered an employee of the City for any purpose. The Attorney and/or its subcontractor(s)shall secure at its own expense and be responsible for any and all paymentof income tax,social security, state disability insurance compensation, unemployment compensation, worker's AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES - 8 (Januaryl, 2006-December 31,2008) compensation,and all other payroll deductions for the Attorney and its officers, agents,and employees and the costs of all business licenses, if any, in connection with the services to be performed hereunder. The Attorney shall be solely responsible for any and all claims or lawsuits filed against the Attorney by personnel employed by the Attorney related to the conditions or terms of employment by the Attorney, and the Attorney shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its employees and officers from any such claims or lawsuits. 19. Case Load Limits. The compensation for services established in this Agreement will cover all cases filed, on a per cause number basis, in the Kent Municipal Court up to a limit of cases per month. The City and the Attorney will agree, by separate,written addendum to this Agreement,on appropriate compensation for case filings exceeding this monthly limit. The Attorney shall establish case load limits for attorneys assigned to perform services under this Agreement that ensure effective representation of each and every client. 20. Compliance with Laws. At all times, the Attorney shall comply with all applicable state, federal, and city laws and regulations, and all court rules, evidence rules, and all cannons and rules of professional conduct applicable to attorneys. 21. Additional Services. The Attorney may be requested to perform additional services beyond the original scope of services as defined in section 1 of this Agreement. Such work will be undertaken only upon written authorization of the City based upon an agreed amount of compensation. 22. Notices. All notices and other written documentation shall be sent to the parties at the following addresses unless otherwise requested in writing: City of Kent: Attorney: Mayor N. Scott Stewart City of Kent Stewart, Beall, and MacNichols, P.S. 220 Fourth Ave. S. 655 W. Smith Street, Suite 210 Kent, WA 98032 Kent, WA 98032 23. Entire Agreement - Amendments. This instrument contains the entire Agreement between the parties for the contemplated work and services to commence AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES-9 ✓� (Janraryl, 2006-December 31,2008) January 1, 2006, and it may not be enlarged, modified, altered, or amended except in writings signed and endorsed by the parties. 24. Duplicate Originals. This Agreement is executed in duplicate originals. 25. Effective Date. Although the terms of this Agreement will not take effect until January 1, 2006, it shall become binding upon the parties on the last date entered below. CITY OF KENT ATTORNEY Print Name: Jim White Print Name: Title: Mayor Title: Dated: Dated: AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES - 10 ,Oanuaryt,2006-DeCember 31,2008) ATTEST: Brenda Jacober, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Tom Brubaker, City Attorney P\Cml\FILES\OpenFiles\0733-2005\PublicDefenseAgr ment-2006to2008 doe t AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES - 11 (>anuaryl,2006—December 31,2006) I� _ I DECLARATION CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY The City of Kent is committed to conform to Federal and State laws regarding equal opportunity. As such all contractors, subcontractors and suppliers who perform work with relation to this contract shall comply with the regulations of the City's equal employment opportunity policies. The following questions specifically identify the requirements the City deems necessary for any contractor, subcontractor or supplier on this specific contract to adhere to. An affirmative response is required on all of the following questions for this contract to be valid and binding. If any contractor,subcontractor or supplier willfully misrepresents themselves with regard to the directives outlines,it will be considered a breach of contract and it will be at the City's sole determination regarding suspension or termination for all or part of the contract; The questions are as follows: 1. I have read the attached City of Kent administrative policy number 1.2. 2. During the time of this contract I will not discriminate in employment on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, age, or the presence of all sensory, mental or physical disability. 3. During the time of this contract the prime contractor will provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equalopportunity employer. 4. During the time of the contract I, the prime contractor,will actively consider hiring and promotion of women and minorities. 5. Before acceptance of this contract, an adherence statement will be signed by me, the Prime Contractor,that the Prime Contractor complied with the requirements as set forth above. By signing below, I agree to fulfill the five requirements referenced above. Dated this day of 2003. By: For: Title: Date: AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES-EEO DOCUMENTS (5eptamber 1,2003-December 31,2005) CITY OF KENT ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY f NUMBER: 1.2 EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 1998 SUBJECT: MINORITY AND WOMEN SUPERSEDES: April 1, 1996 CONTRACTORS APPROVED BY Jim White, Mayor POLICY: Equal employment opportunity requirements for the City of Kent will conform to federal and state laws. All contractors, subcontractors, consultants and suppliers of the City must guarantee equal employment opportunity within their organization and, if holding contracts with the City amounting to $10,000 or more within any given year, must take the following affirmative steps: 1. Provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer. f2. Actively consider for promotion and advancement available minorities and women. Any contractor, subcontractor, consultant or supplier who willfully disregards the City's nondiscrimination and equal opportunity requirements shall be considered in breach of contract and subject to suspension or termination for all or part of the contract. Contract Compliance Officers will be appointed by the Directors of Planning, Parks, and Public Works Departments to assume the following duties for their respective departments. 1. Ensuring that contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and suppliers subject to these regulations are familiar with the regulations and the City's equal employment opportunity policy. 2. Monitoring to assure adherence to federal, state and local laws, policies and guidelines. AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES— EEO DOCUMENTS (September 1,2003-December 31,2005) CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMPLIANCE STATEMENT This form shalt be filled out AFTER COMPLETION of this project by the Contractor awarded the contract. I, the undersigned, a duly represented agent of Company, hereby acknowledge and declare that the before-mentioned company was the prime contract for the contract known as that was entered into on the (date) , between the firm I represent and the City of Kent. I declare that I complied fully with all of the requirements and obligations as outlined in the City of Kent Administrative Policy 1.2 and the Declaration City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Polity that was part of the beforementioned contract. Dated this day of , 2003. By: For: Title: Date: AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES- EEO DOCUMENTS (September 1,2003-December 31,2005) Kent City Council Meeting Date December 13, 2005 Category Consent Calendar I. SUBJECT: 2006 ART PLAN AND FIVE YEAR ART PLAN—APPROVE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approve the 2006 City Art Plan and Five Year Art Plan. The attached City Art Plan shows projects carried over from 2005, details of projects for 2006, and includes art expenditures planned for 2006-2010, as part of the five-year plan. The Visual Arts Committee worked with staff to create the plan which was approved by Kent Arts Commission on October 25, 2005. 3. EXHIBITS: 2006 Art Plan and Five Year Art Plan and City Ordinance 2552 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Parks and Human Services Commission (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure9 X Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes X No If no: Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue- Fund Amount $ 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No 6M KENT ARTS COMMISSION CITY ART 5 YEAR PLAN 2006—2010 2006 PROJECTS COSTS Capital Project Artwork, Riverview Overpass @ 108ii' Street 40,000 Capital Project Artwork, Downtown Improvements I* 25,000 Capital Project Artwork, Riverview Park, design team 10,000 Maintenance Downtown Mural Repair(Kherson) 12,000 Portable Collection Purchases 5,000 Adjustment to 2005 project Train CorndorArt increase 2,000 Administration;Maintenance 103,000 Year Total $197,000 *2"d& Smith• Town Square, 2"d Ave improvements(E. Conner), 200612007 2007 PROJECTS COSTS Capital Project, Neighborhood Park(Riverview) 20,000 Capital Project West Hill Neighborhood Park 30,000 Capital Project Artwork, Downtown Improvements W 20,000 Capital Project Artwork, 132d Studio/Park design 10,000 Capital Project, Clark Lake Integrated art design 5000 Portable Collection Purchases 5,000 Administration/Maintenance 106,000 Year Total $206,000 *2"d& Smith, Town Square; 2od Ave improvements (E Conner) "Clark Lake Integrated Artwork, phase I(R Tomlinson, 200712008) 2008 PROJECTS COSTS Capital Project, Clark Lake Integrated Artwork 40,000 Capital Project Artwork, 132"d Studio/Park design 25,000 _ Portable Collection Purchases 5,000 Administration/Maintenance 109,000 Year Total $179,000 2009 PROJECTS COSTS Capital Projects 50,000 Reclamation or Community Art Project 12,000 Portable Art Collection Purchases 6,000 Administration/Maintenance 112,000 Year Total $180,000 272"d St Neighborhood Park design, Commons Playfields 2010 PROJECTS COSTS Capital Project Art 60,000 Community participation or reclamation art project 12,000 Portable Collection Purchases 6,000 Administration/Maintenance 115,000 Year Total $193,000 272"d St Park Art Gateways, Valley Floor Community Park CITY OF KENT Parks, Recreation & Community Services Kent Arts Commission i 2006 CITY ART PLAN FIVE YEAR CITY ART PLAN, 2006-2010 Ordinance 2552 j R Approved, Visual Arts Committee October 25, 2005 Kent Arts Commission October 25 2005 City Council Sub-Committee, City Council 1 CITY OF KENT Parks, Recreation & Community Services Kent Arts Commission 2006 CITY ART PLAN PROJECTS 2006 Costs Capital Project Riverview Overpass @ 108'h St $40,000 Capital Project Town Square Park $25,000 Capital Project Riverview Park Design Team $10,000 Maintenance downtown mural (Kherson) $12,000 Portable Collection Purchases $5,000 Carryover 2005 Downtown Gateway Seat Art(M. Van Slyke) 12,500 " "Agriculture"monumental sculpture by Peter Requram 30,000 Reclamation Art Projects, Train Corridor(2) 10,000 2,000 Capital Project Art Three Friends Fishing Hole 10,000 Community Participation Art.Russell Road Park 3,000 Subtotal 65,500 $94,000 OTHER EXPENSES Salary&Administration $87,000 Supplies 2,000 Professional Services (Design, Consultant Fees, Maintenance/Repair) 14,000 Subtotal $103,000 M2006 TOTAL $197,000 1 t 2 KENT ARTS COMMISSION 2006 CITY ART PLAN NARRATIVE Protect Title, Riverview Overpass Proiect Description: An artist experienced in working on transportation projects will be selected to work with the City to include art on the new Riverview Overpass. Art may include artist-made building parts such as safety rails and/or inclusion or modifications to integrated structures The artist may use construction credits, if appropriate. Estimated 2006 Costs: $40,000 Funding Source: City Art Plan Background The arts commission is seeking to place art in visible locations for maximum impact to the visitors and residents of Kent The intent is to provide icons to distinguish Kent as a unique destination. Art at this busy location can act as a gateway to the city, providing a place signifier to visitors and yet remain relevant to local residents. Proiect Title- Downtown Improvements, Town Square Park Proiect Description: Designs formulated by Elizabeth Conner working with the City and design group for Town Square and 2Id Avenue improvements will be fabricated. This allocation will partially fund the fabrication of the work. Estimated 2004 Costs: $25,000 Funding Source: City Art Plan Background/Justification: The City has committed resources to make connections in downtown Kent at Town Square Plaza and on Second Avenue. Design team artist Elizabeth Conner has been working with the City and designers of the park since 2003 The design work she has contributed to the project will be partially funded through construction credits and two City Art Plan allocations (in 2006 and 2007) The artwork will provide aesthetic enhancements within the city that draw visitors to the main shopping district Protect Title Riverview Park design team artist Protect Description, An artist will be selected by panel from a pool of applicants generated through an open call process. The selected artists will work with Park Planning and Park designers to provide design input into the plan for Riverview Park. The artist would suggest ways to integrate art as part of the overall design of the space Estimated 2005 Costs, $10,000 Funding Source City Art Plan Background/Justification- An artist in the design phase of a project allows art to be seamlessly integrated into the overall park design Functional elements can be enhanced and art opportunities recognized at an early stage Art ideas can be incorporated into the design and construction documents at a substantial cost-savings and artist-made fixtures can take the place of"off-the-shelf" 3 items to create a unique sense of place. Other successful design team projects include Garrison Creek Park art by Elizabeth Conner and Morrill Meadows Park "In the Grove" by T Ellen Sollod Proiect Title. Maintenance— Downtown Murals (Kherson) Proiect Description: A professional painter will refurbish an existing, deteriorated mural currently at the site in downtown Kent. The artist would work the building owner to complete the project. Estimated 2005 Costs: $10,000 Funding Source City Art Plan Background/Justification: The successful and popular city mural projects improved the downtown and the tram corridor by providing destinations and aesthetic enhancement within the downtown core. The program was widely supported during it's inception and continues to be a popular feature in Kent. Many of the murals have reached their life span and need to be renovated or replaced This particular mural is painted directly on a privately owned wall. The intent is to repair or replace the mural once the owner has given permission for the work. Repairing the mural would provide the aesthetic and community benefits to the park that it has enjoyed to date. Proiect Title Portable Collection Purchases Proiect Description, Purchase quality artworks from area artists that enhance the quality and value of the City Portable Art collection The artworks are exhibited in publicly accessible areas of City facilities. Estimated 2004 Costs: $5,000 Funding Source- City Art Plan Background- The City of Kent Arts Commission has established a collection of portable artwork that includes a variety of quality two-dimensional artworks The purchase awards at Canterbury Fine Art Exhibit attract quality area artists to enter. Other portable art is purchased to enhance the art collection and respond to specific exhibit needs The funds allow the City to introduce art into the workplace and in public areas where the community does business This program supports local artists, serves specific needs for special projects and promotes participation in City programs A work environment that includes amenities such as art has bee shown to increase productivity and fob satisfaction 4 LOCATIONS FOR ART Riverview Overpass @ 108"'Street Part of the S 228`� Street extension running east/west between S 288`h St and Military Road Art will be for overpass bridge over the Green River Riverview Park Green River(W+S)and SR167(E).Access via Hawley Rd (N). Green River Trail access A 15 acre community park along the Green river to include open space, trail access, parking, picnic shelter, restroom, interpretative signage, play equipment, non-motorized boat access, ADA accessible fishing platform and view benchestplatforms facing the Green River West Hill Neighborhood Park Military Road at SE 244th Street 7.8 acres undeveloped site 132nd Neighborhood Park (Studio, grant-funded) 132 Avenue &266 Street East Hill, Kent A new 5 5 acre neighborhood park with playfield, play equipment, tennis courts, basketball court, volleyball area, picnic shelter, public art, art studio and art plaza, and parking Clark Lake Park SE 240th Street and 126th Avenue 43 6 acres. The City of Kent intends to acquire land around the lake to create a 126 acre community open space park that will be the"crown jewel' of Kent It is intended to conserve a contiguous open space around Clark Lake which sustains the natural environment, enhances wildlife habitat, fosters education, and provides passive recreation opportunities The site will serve as a regional amenity for present and future generations A master plan and management plan, made in conjunction with the input from artist Ruth Marie Tomlinson, has been adopted. Development of the park will take place in phases over 20 years. S 272nd Street Neighborhood Park SE 272 Street at 114th Avenue 3 5 t acres Commons Playfields James Street and 5th Ave N 17 3 acres with current amenities of baseball/softball/soccer fields, bleachers, trails 6 ORDINANCE NO. C�S6o2 AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, Washington relating to public art; establishing a City Art Program, directing establishment of guidelines and procedures for administration of , \ the City Art Program; establishing a City Art v Fund; adding a new Chapter 2.35 Kent City Code in conjunction therewith; amending Chapter 2.34 KCC concerning the City of Kent r Arts Commission (Sections 1 - 6, Ordinance f`pbA` 1944), repealing KCC 3.14.368, the Arts (HIV Commission Fund (Section 7, Ordinance 1944) . f1. I WHEREAS, the aesthetic nature and charm of the City of I Kent shall be enhanced, and the citizens of the City of Kent shall hold and enjoy works of art for the public environment and welfare; and 1 WHEREAS, the City intends to expand the opportunity for Kent residents to experience art in public places and to create a more visually pleasing and humane environment; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate to establish a means whereby the City of Kent Arts Commission shall maintain an orderly acquisition of art by the City of Kent; and i {1` WHEREAS, there shall be a City Art Program which shall i consist of Guidelines, Procedures and an Art Plan; NOW THEREFORE, I THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: I� Section 1. A new Chapter 2.35 is added to the Kent City Code, as follows: i CITY ART PROGRAM I I ? 2.35.010. ART FUND CREATED. There is hereby established I a City Art Fund. Monies for the Fund shall be received from: t t� A. ANNUAL BUDGET. Two (2) dollars per budget year for each City resident, based upon population data certified by r rr i! �f� 1 the State of Washington Office of Financial Management. Budgeted l but unspent funds shall be maintained in the Art Fund, and carried; I� forward at the end of each budget year. B. GIFTS, DONATIONS AND GRANTS. Private or public [ gifts, endowments, donations, bequests or other grants. C. OTHER. Such other sources as may be available. 1 D. INTEREST FROM THE CITY ART FUND. 2.35.020. FUND USE - ART PROGRAM - COLLECTION. f� A. Inclusions - The City Art Fund may be used for all costs for works of art, administrative costs of the City Art Program, and all costs of installation and maintenance. B. The City of Kent Arts Commission and Staff shall recommend the amount to be made available for the purchase of art, in consultation with City staff. The designation of projects and sites, selection, contracting, purchase, commissioning, review of design, execution and placement, acceptance, maintenance, sale, exchange, or disposition of work of art shall be recommended by the Kent Arts Commission and Staff, for approval by the City Council, in accordance with the City Art Program Guidelines. C. All works of art purchased and commissioned I , under the City Art Program shall become a part of a City Art Collection. The City Art Collection shall be developed, administered and operated by the Kent Arts Commission with 1cooperation and support of the Kent Parks Department Staff. D. The works of art may be placed on public lands, integrated with or attached to a public building or structure, SSSSSS detached within or outside a public building or structure, or part ; �Iof a portable collection or exhibit. r, 2 _ I I i i E. Nothing in this Chapter shall limit the amount of money the City of Kent may expend for art. ij 2.35.030. GENERAL PROCEDURES. iI A. Upon consultation with the City of Kent Arts Commission, Guidelines and Procedures shall be prepared by Staff 1 1 for the implementation of the Arts Program. Such Guidelines and i Procedures shall be reviewed by the City of Kent Arts Commission and Staff annually, and recommendations shall be made to the City Council for approval. B. A City Art Plan including a schedule and budget for all City Art Program projects shall be prepared and updated ( annually by the City of Kent Arts Commission and Staff. The City i Art Plan shall be reviewed and approved annually by the City {Council. C� Section 2. Chapter 2.34 KCC (Ordinance 1944, Sections � 1 - 7) is amended as follows: KENT ARTS COMMISSION 2.34.0(-(-4+)10. ARTS COMMISSION CREATED. There is hereby created ( ( t-e--be known---as4) the Kent Arts i1commission. 2.34.0(fQ4)20. PURPOSE. The City of Kent Arts { Commission and Staff may, alone or in cooperation with any other private, civic or public body of any City, county or the State of Washington, initiate, sponsor or conduct programs calculated to further public awareness of and interest in the visual and performing arts. (i 2.34.( K--2+)030. MEMBERSHIP - TERM. The membership of �( the City of Kent Arts Commission shall be twelve members to be lappointed by the Mayor with the approval of the City Council. Of I'kthe first twelve members appointed, six shall be appointed for two !{ years and six shall be appointed for four years, with the i{ 1� if - 3 - { i t i j respective terms of each initial appointee to be determined by i 1 lot. Subsequent appointments shall be for a period of four years for for the unexpired balance of the term for which appointed, whichever is the lesser period. In addition to the twelve appointed members, one member of the City Council shall be designated by the president of the Council to serve as an ex l officio member of the City of Kent Arts Commission for a term of I il one year. 2.34.( (+63)040. OFFICERS - MONTHLY MEETINGS. The City of Kent Arts Commission shall elect its officers, including a chairman, vice chairman, and such officers as it may deem necessary. Such persons shall occupy their respective offices for a period of one year. The City of Kent Arts Commission shall hold regular public meetings at least monthly. 2.34((99) )050. RULES - PUBLIC RECORD. The City of Kent Arts Commission shall adopt rules for transaction of business and shall keep written minutes of its proceedings which minutes shall be a public record. 1 2.34.((�)060. BUDGET. The City of Kent Arts Commission and Staff shall each year submit to the City Administrator and City Council for approval a proposed budget for the following year in the manner provided by Law for preparation I and submission of budgets by appointive officials. ISection 3. KCC 3.14.368 (ordinance 1944, Section 7) is hereby repealed: ( established a is a—entitled City e€ Kent Arts 6eFamiesien Fond, ..te ..tom.eh shall be pl 1 , j () teg Cher with any iffiseellaReei4a revenues, grantr, qi€ts, or I t it ffj - 4 I� the sueeeedingyear.) ) Section 4. 1986 Budget - Funding. The funding provided for in KCC 2.35.010V shall first take effect and be in force for the 1986 City of Kent Budget. i Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after its passage, i approval and publication as provided by kAw. i rSABEL HOGAN, MAYOV ATTEST- BETTY dAY, DLPU7Y CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: P. STEPHEN DIJULIO, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED the /c5 day of C J 1985. APPROVED the 1Z-day of 1 , 1985. tt1 PUBLISHED the i day of L4�zt , 1965. i 1 I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance) No. a SoJ- , passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereo� indicated. MOO- (SEAL) BETTY (WAY, DEPliDY CTTY CLERK 2540-110 - 5 - Kent City Council Meeting Dge. Le.cember_l3 2005 category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: 2005 ANNUAL DOCKET REPORT, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING MAP AND TEXT AMENDMENTS — APPROVE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approve the 2005 Annual Docket Report as recommended by the Planning & Economic Development Committee. The report is a list of this year's suggested amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning maps and text. The City Council's action on this docket report moves the items forward for the appropriate staff analysis and public hearings by the Land Use and Planning Board. Final action by the City Council will follow. 3. EXHIBITS: Staff report dated 12/5/05 w/attachments: 2005 Annual Docket Report, 10/24/05 LUPB minutes and 11/21/05 PEDC minutes 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Planning& Economic Development Committee (3-0) (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? No Revenue? No Currently in the Budget? Yes No If no: Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue. Fund Amount $ 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No 6N COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Fred N. Satterstrom, Director T PLANNING SERVICES T Charlene Anderson, AICP, Manager K E N WASH NGTON Phone: 253-856-5454 Fax, 253-856-6454 Address 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, WA 98032-5895 December 5, 2005 To: Mayor Jim White, Council President Deborah Ranniger, and Kent City Council From: Gloria Gould-Wessen, AICP, GIS Coordinator/Planner Through: Mayor Jim White Re: 2005 Annual Docket Report MOTION: Approve the 2005 Annual Docket Report as recommended by the Planning & Economic Development Committee. SUMMARY: On October 24, 2005, the Land Use & Planning Board (LU&PB) held a public hearing for the 2005 Annual Docket Report and voted 4:0 to approve the report. The Planning & Economic Development Committee (PEDC) approved the report 3:0 on November 21, 2005. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: The Growth Management Act outlines a procedure for jurisdictions to follow that assists the public in making suggested amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, development regulations, or growth policies on an annual basis. The suggested amendments "shall be docketed" meaning maintained on a list to ensure they will be considered by the city and available for public review. The 2005 Annual Docket Report lists the suggested amendments for this year. They include: one (1) zoning code amendment proposed by a citizen; three (3) miscellaneous text amendments proposed by city staff, and includes a miscellaneous map correction; and three (3) map amendments proposed by either city staff or neighboring jurisdictions. Included in the 2005 Annual Docket Report are three (3) Comprehensive Plan land use and zoning map amendments proposed by property owners. A table summarizing the docket Items is provided, along with minutes from the LU&PB and PEDC meetings. Staff will be available at the December 13'h meeting to further discuss the recommendation. CA I GGWI pm P.I Planning I Docketing I2005l Council 121305 doc Enc. 2005 Annual Docket Report, Minutes of 10/24 LUPB hearing, Minutes of 11121 PEDC meeting cc: Fred N Satterstrom,AICP, C D Director Charlene Anderson,AICP, Planning Manager Gloria Gould-Wessen,AICP, GIS Coordinator/Planner William D Osborne, AICP, Planner Project File cd as _ ❑❑ O U cr U cz U U m U U d C.) U 3 R U FC U �� rl N z rq y U � cvcv ate+ �= .Yi Li vUi cc bj� c�i .O. pq O cUC C1. O y, O C C, 7C Y O O 4M O oj c� o O a'"i o W Uo I:. c o Y w � o o rq OO .v�i .1 4 vN � N F- Mp, 0 04L) i O � to tz O O O N cl M1.Y I j on a, y m Y = pp cd N U N ;ZL, cz a -S o ° W o U U o K z � .� > y N m = �+, in. �., y b cz O y O �' � � � sue, ..��..� T3� p > w y cUC Q a; Z � c� Lr- WdU Q � � O did Ocz N j ~ O N O M O O O QO O O kn Z O kn O p Z U U O M Q O Q O O Q O O Q O N Q O O -S4N -14 Q � Q a U Q � U Q a1 U ❑ � U Q D1 U U U U U U cd U U r. U +r O O tty� clit y � w ¢, A M as ct d �c �+ N r M v� X N No (�j a�i C3 U aC) O a a U y U o CL u > K O V C r OVo t U ^ vUi � 1_•1 ��^ N O w .� L"i G" N � cd b a+ N Vl fti w v' N � S-'y to ,.aU,/i aq 0i � i 4 U cd V] FW Q �.." N r-7 Q�.. U V] O O ^ G� O bp O x �bio m cd y cd �� �73w t73a xa ° v� v� U C No cn W b O r O 00 O oNN N rl L o U L� a, U L1ooUCIA L 00xtN @ « # @ / \ \ t \ \ b $ # � ^ @ c # \ \ � # ) / 5U \ Le � @ E , z � /} / 1 fj o \ 2 / \ P. Q E to, @ o # = R / 3 \ j § � 7 /� \ / $ ca - t § o 4-0 d 10 E2 - 1 ct _ » U \ 2 - @ z 2 / 2 @ gtg � j 4 < z = \ £ G j \ Gf ) @ § f * ( \ ocCIA } @ @ LAND USE&PLANNING BOARD MINUTES OCTOBER 249 2005 BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Jon Johnson, Vice Chair Dana Ralph, Steve Dowell, Kenneth Wendhng BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: Tim Gimenez, David Malik, Elizabeth Watson; All Excused STAFF MEMBERS: Charlene Anderson, William Osborne, Kim Adams Pratt, Pamela Mottram Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in City Council Chambers. Approval of Minutes Steve Dowell Moved and Dana Ralph Seconded a Motion to approve the Minutes of September 19, 2005. Motion Carried Added Items None Communications Planning Manager Charlene Anderson stated that a tour of Comprehensive Plan Amendment sites will be scheduled for sometime in November and she will notify the Board when the date is set. 2005 Annual Docket Report Planning Manager Charlene Anderson explained the new docketing process used to consider proposals received throughout the year. She presented seven(7) docket items. Ms. Anderson stated that rather than consider the substance and merits of each docket item individually, the intent of this evening's meeting is for the Board to decide whether to move forward the docket items for further action, along with the three amendments presented by William Osborne. 2005 Annual Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Map Amendments #CPA 2005-2(A-CY"A 2005(13 Planner William Osborne presented three (3) applications received from private property owners this year for amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Zoning map; known as the Bohannon, Millemum-Kangley Building II and Safeguard Self-Storage Phase 4 amendments Mr. Osborne cited the location and intent for each proposal. Chair Jon Johnson opened the Public Hearing. Robert Parnell, 4422 1871h Place SE, Kent, WA 98027 spoke on behalf of the Bohannon amendment. He explained why they have requested specific zoning for the site located at 11407 SE 2481h Street. Mr. Parnell stated that he believes SF-6 zoning would be compatible with surrounding property, that a plat development would provide upgrades to the road at 114th , and that 2481h Street would be developed to City standards. Joel Kessell, 5700 1001h St. SE, Suite 630-166, Lakewood, WA 98199 spoke on behalf of the Millennium-Kangley Building II amendment. He addressed access issues for the subject property located at 26046 116th Avenue Southeast. Steve Dowell Moved and Dana Ralph Seconded a Motion to close the Public Hearing. Motion Carried Steve Dowell Moved and Dana Ralph Seconded a Motion to accept staff's recommendation to move the docketed items forward for consideration with the exception of the 42nd Avenue item which will become part of the Public Works 2006 work program. Motion Carried Adjournment Dana Ralph Moved and Steve Dowell Seconded a Motion to ad'ourn the meeting. Motion Carried. Chair Johnson adjourned the meeting at 7 30 p in. ef Charlene Anderson, AI P, Plannmg Mana er Secretary of the Board S IPermitlPianILUPB120051Mmutesl 102405min doe Land Use and Planning Board Minutes October 24,2005 PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES NOVEMBER 219 2005 Committee Members: Chair Tim Clark, Ron Harmon, Bruce White The meeting was called to order by-Chair Clark_ at 4:00 P.M. Approval of Minutes Member White moved and Member Hannon seconded a motion to approve the minutes of October 17, 2005. Motion Passed 3-0. ZCA-2005-3 Commercial Motor Vehicles in Residential Zoning Districts Planner Damien Hooper presented five options: 1) to allow commercial motor vehicles outright in residential zoning districts, 2) to disallow commercial vehicles in residential districts, 3) to allow commercial motor vehicles via a Conditional Use Permit, 4) to allow commercial motor vehicles via a Special Home Occupation Permit, 5) to deny the proposal. Chair Clark declared the public hearing open. Janet Lewis, 13507 SE 2501h St., Kent, WA 98042 submitted pictures for the record of commercial trucks located at Kent Kangley and 1161h and at 100 and 256"' Ms. Lewis stated that Kent needs to develop a partnership with the trucking companies for providing and delivering their products and services without devaluing the residential areas. She stated roads are not designed for huge vehicles being driven through these areas; Streets, sidewalks and stone drainage areas are being damaged. She stated that King County cited $64,000 as the cost to repair a one mile stretch of road in Kent She stated that Kent needs to establish a place for the truckers to park without infringing on the residential districts. Member Harmon moved and Member White seconded a motion to accept the pictures submitted by Ms. Lewis for the record. Motion Passed 3-0. Dick Staples, 14629 SE 267ih St., Kent, WA submitted pictures of his neighborhood showing that he lives in a neighborhood where many of the residents store boats, campers and trailers on their sites. He stated that his neighbors are not opposed to his truck in the neighborhood and questioned how his truck differs from the other vehicles parked in his community. Member Harmon moved and Member White seconded a motion to accept pictures submitted by Dick Staples for the record. Motion Passed 3-0. Member White Moved and Member Harmon seconded a motion to close the public hearing. Motion Passed 3-0. Damien Hooper addressed questions raised by Member Harmon with respect to how Option 4 would affect Mr. Sanders and Mr Staples Member Harmon moved and Member Clark seconded a motion to accept Option 4 allowing the storage and parking of commercial motor vehicles in residential zoned properties by means of a Special Home Occupation Pemut (KCC 15.08.040) and to provide criteria for the approval of a special home occupancy permit The Hearing Examiner may also impose conditions of approval Motion Passed 2 to 1 with Member White Opposed Member Clark stated that this issue will be sent to City Council in January ZCA-2005-7 Shipping Containers in Residential Zonine Districts Planner Damien Hooper presented the following four options- 1) to accept the Land Use and Planning Board's recommendation to prohibit the storage of shipping containers in residential districts; 2) to prohibit shipping containers in residential districts and redefine them as cargo containers, 3) to allow cargo containers in single family and other residential zones by applying standards; such as restricting the containers to a maximum size of 10 x 20 feet and placing them in a stick-built structure with a pitched roof to maintain the residential characteristic of the neighborhood or, 4) to Deny this proposed amendment and continue to work within the framework of Kent's current ordinances. Mr. Hooper stated that a public hearing could be held by the Committee in January if they desire to change the Land Use and Planning Board's (LUPB)recommendation Planning Manager Charlene Anderson stated that based on the Committee's concerns as to where trucks would park if denied in single family districts, she spoke with Barbara Ivanoff, Washington State Department of Transportation. Ms Ivanoff indicated an interest in working with the City of Kent and a private developer to establish a truck stop in Kent. In response to the Committee, Ms Anderson stated that staff called self-storage facilities and warehouses who also stated they could accommodate one or more trucks at their locations. Ms. Anderson concurred with Member Harmon that this issue would require another hearing either before the LUPB or the Committee to consider the additional options Member Hannon moved and Member White seconded a motion to send #ZCA-2005-7 Shipping Containers in Residential Zoning Districts back to the LUPB for a public hearing to consider the options as presented. Motion Passed 3-0. Annual Docketing Report Planner Gloria Gould-Wessen described the changes to the annual amendment process stating that the City amended K.C.C. Chapter 12.02 last year to include docketing. She stated that the Docket is tied to the annual land use and zoning map amendment application process with a timeline for filing by the first working day in September Ms. Wessen said that the City accepts docketing submittals from any individual, agency or jurisdiction at no cost. She stated that the land use snap amendment applications are fee-based and submitted by property owners or authorized agents. Ms. Gould-Wessen stated that December I" has been established as the deadline for review by the LU&PB and March 31"as the deadline for City Council decision on the docket (listing) Ms. Gould-Wessen described the review process and the criteria to be used when considering the docket items. Ms. Wessen identified the docket items on the report. 2005 Annual Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments Planner William Osborne described the three comprehensive plan map amendment application proposals: 1) the Bohannon Amendment with the subject site located on East Hill, 2) the Millennium Kangley Building 1I Amendment with the subject site located just north of the intersection of 116t"' and 130 and Kent-Kangley, and 3) Safeguard Self-Storage Phase 4 Amendment with the subject site located on Washington Avenue. Member Harnlon moved and Member White seconded a motion to accept the LUPB's recommendation to approve the 2005 Annual Docketing Report. Motion Passed 3-0. Member White moved and Member Harmon seconded a motion to accept the LUPB's recommendation to act on the (3) three 2005 Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment Applications. Motion Passed 3-0 Adiournment Chair Clark adjourned the meeting at 5.00 p in. A�&A 1A ma MW Pamela Mottram, Admin Secretary, Planning Services S IPeinurlPlanlPlannwg Conun,rree120051A4uru1esl/01705nnu doe P&EDC Meeting Minutes— 11/21/05 Page 2 of 2 Kent City Council Meeting Date December 13 2005 Category-Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: AGREEMENT WITH PUGET SOUND ENERGY FOR EASEMENT AT SERVICE CLUB PARK—AUTHORIZE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement with Puget Sound Energy (PSE) for an easement at Service Club Park. Puget Sound Energy requires an agreement for easement to install and maintain the electrical service at Service Club Park, located at 14608 SE 288th Street in Kent. 3. EXHIBITS: PSE Easement agreement and Public Works Director's memo 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure'? X Revenue? N/A SCurrently in the Budget? Yes X No If no: Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount S Unbudgeted Revenue- Fund Amount S 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No 60 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Larry R Blanchard, Public Works Director Phone 253-856-5500 K E N T Fax 253-856-6500 W A s M I N o r O N Address 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent, WA 98032-5895 DATE: December 5, 2005 ' TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Larry Blanchard, Public Works Director SUBJECT: City of Kent and Highline Water District Agreement for Establishment of Water Service Area MOTION. Recommend Council authorize the Mayor to sign the City of Kent and Highline Water District Interlocal Agreement for establishment of water service areas ' SUMMARY: This Interlocal agreement is to memorialize the request by the City to revise the ' 1999 Agreement for Amendment of service area to incorporate those areas that currently can be served by Kent. The revision to this agreement more clearly identifies those areas that can be served by the City of Kent and those areas that can be served by Highline Water District. BUDGET IMPACT: No Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personnel Impact ' BACKGROUND: In 1999 the City of Kent and Highline Water District entered into an agreement to determine the service area of each jurisdiction to the Kent-view PUD (Polygon Development). The service area was based on each jurisdictions ability to provide sufficient water supply to this area. ' Also, errors were made in the original description of this service area and a revised agreement would give us the opportunity to correct this error. tThe revisions to this original water service agreement more clearly describes each jurisdictions capable water service area and consequently places more Kent citizens with the Kentview Development(Polygon) inside of Kent's Water Service area No major adjustments will need to be made to either jurisdictions operational procedures to provide for this transition of service 1 i 1 RETURN ADDRESS: Puget Sound Energy, Inc. Attn: R/W Department(J. Mai) PO Box 90868 1 EST-06W Bellevue,WA 98009 EASEMENT REFERENCE#: ' GRANTOR. CITY OF KENT, a municipal corporation GRANTEE PUGET SOUND ENERGY,INC. SHORT LEGAL Portion of SE 34-22-04 ASSESSOR'S PROPERTY TAX PARCEL. 332204.9243 ' For and in consideration of One Dollar($1 00) and other valuable consideration in hand paid, CITY OF KENT, a municipal corporation ("Grantor"herein), hereby conveys and warrants to PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC., a ' Washington Corporation ("Grantee" herein), for the purposes hereinafter set forth, a nonexclusive perpetual easement over, under, along, across, and through the following described real property ("Property" herein) in King County, Washington- THE WEST HALF OF THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING EAST OF A LINE DRAWN PARALELL TO AND 30 FEET EAST OF THE WEST BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; EXCEPT THE NORTH QUARTER AND EXCEPT THE SOUTH 360 FEET THEREOF. Except as may be otherwise set forth herein Grantee's rights shall be exercised upon that portion of the Property ("Easement Area"herein)described as follows THE WEST 15 FEET OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY,LESS THE SOUTH 150 FEET THEREOF,AND LESS THE NORTH 290 FEET THEREOF. ' 1. Purpose Grantee shall have the right to construct operate, maintain, repair, replace, improve, remove, enlarge, and use the easement area for one or more utility systems for purposes of transmission, distribution and sale of electricity. Such systems may include, but are n t limited to. Underground facilities. Conduits, lines, bles, vaults, switches and transformers for electricity; rvabl semi-buried or ground-mounted facilities and pads, manholes, meters, fixtures, attachments and any and all other facilities or appurtenances necessary or convenient to any or all of the foregoing. ' Following the initial construction of all or a portion of its systems, Grantee may, from time to time, construct such additional facilities as it may require for such systems Grantee shall have the right of access to the Easement Area over and across the Property to enable Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder. Grantee shall compensate Grantor for any damage to the Property caused by the exercise of such right of access by Grantee. 2. Easement Area Clearing and Maintenance. Grantee shall have the right to cut, remove and dispose of ' any and all brush, trees or other vegetation in the Easement Area. Grantee shall also have the right to control, on a continuing basis and by any prudent and reasonable means, the establishment and growth of brush, trees or other vegetation ;n the Easement Area 3. Grantor's Use of Easement Area. Grantor reserves the right to use the Easement Area for any purpose not inconsistent with the rights herein granted, provided, however, Grantor shall not construct or maintain any buildings, structures or other objects on the Easement Area and Grantor shall do no blasting within 300 feet of Grantee's facilities without Grantee's prior written consent. i V failure to Initially install Its systems on the' Easement Area within any period of time from the date hereof.reasonabie ' means,the establishment and growth of brush,trees or other vegetation in the Easement Area 6 Successors and Assigns The rights and obligations of the parties shalt inure to the benefit of and be , binding upon their respective successors and assigns. 7. Restoration. By the recording of this easement the Grantee herein agrees to restore any area of the , subject property disturbed during exercise of the rights granted herein, to a condition as nearly as practicable to the condition they were in immediately before the exercise of said rights. DATED this day of 2005. ' GRANTOR. CITY OF KENT, a municipal corporation ' BY, , Mayor STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ' ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of 2005, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared to me known to be the , and of the CITY OF KENT, the municipal corporation that executed the within and foregoing Instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be their free and voluntary act and deed and the free and voluntary act and deed of CITY OF KENT for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute the said instrument on behalf of said CITY OF KENT. ' IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. (Signature of Notary) ' (Print or stamp name of Notary) , NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at ' My Appointment Expires: Notary seal,text and all notations must be inside I'margins , 1 Kent City Council Meeting Date December 13, 2005 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: VEHICLE EQUIPMENT SURPLUS —AUTHORIZE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization to declare the equipment described in the Public Works memorandum of November 2, 2005 as surplus and authorize staff to appropriately dispose thereof in accordance with the City policy. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director's memorandum 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes No If no: Unbudgeted Expense- Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund Amount $ 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION- Council Agenda Item No. 6P PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Don E. Wickstr-om, P E.-Public Works Director Phone 253-856-5500 K E N T Fax 253-856-6500 W A S H I N G T O N Address 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent, WA 98032-5895 DATE: November 2, 2005 TO: Mayor White and Kent City Council FROM: Larry Blanchard, Public Works Director THROUGH: SUBJECT: Vehicle and Equipment Surplus ' MOTION: Recommend that the City Council authorize staff to appropriately dispose of the equipment as described in this memorandum and listed below. SUMMARY: The listed vehicles/equipment comply with current replacement policy guidelines and have been replaced. The equipment will be sold at auction or sold to smaller cities. BUDGET IMPACT: The monetary returns from the auction will be incorporated into the fleet internal services reserve fund. This is a positive budget impact. BACKGROUND: Vehicle/Equipment List: POLICE UNITS AND MISCELLANEOUS SEDANS 3186 1999 Ford Crown Victoria, s/n 2FAFP7IWOXX155506, license 27052D, 103,515 miles, 6 years This vehicle was replaced and removed from active patrol service in 2002. It was moved back into service as part of the VIPS (Volunteers in Police Service) program where it has continued until recently The vehicle is no longer cost effective due to rising repair costs and signs of a failing exhaust system. This vehicle has exceeded our current replacement policy guidelines for 3 years and/or 80,000 miles. ' 3187 1999 Ford Crown Victoria, s/n 2FAFP71W2XX155507, license 27045D, 93,585 miles, 6 years. This vehicle was also replaced and removed from active patrol service in 2002. It was moved back into service as part of the VIP (Volunteers in Police Service) program where it has continued until recently It is showing signs of weakness and repair cost potential. It exceeds our current replacement policy guidelines for 3 years and/or 80,000 miles ' 3206 2000 Ford Crown Victoria, s/n 2FAFP71 WXYX 156891, license 30000D, 93,992 miles, 5 years. This police patrol unit was evaluated for replacement in 2003 and given an extended life cycle. During its extended life cycle it was involved in 1 body damage repair and 3 PIT maneuver repairs. The vehicle has ' exceeded our current replacement policy guidelines for 3 years and/or 80,000 miles. Mayor White and Kent City Council I Surplus Vehicle/Equipment P./Operations/Fleet/Surplus/surplus memo 11_2_05 doc 3207 2000 Ford Crown Victoria, s/n 2FAFP71 W 1YX156892, license 29998D, 105,221_miles, 5 years. This police patrol unit was evaluated in 2003 and given an extended life cycle for replacement. , During its extended life cycle it was involved in 1 body repair accident and 2 PIT maneuver repairs. It was replaced in 2004 and has exceeded our current replacement policy guidelines for 3 years and/or 80,000 miles. 3208 2000 Ford Crown Victoria, s/n 2FAFP71W3YX156893, license 29915D, 88,696 miles, 5 years. , This patrol unit was evaluated for replacement in 2003 and given an extended life cycle. During its extended life cycle it was involved in 2 body repair accidents and 6 PIT maneuver repairs The vehicle has exceeded our current replacement policy guidelines for 3 years and/or 80,000 miles 3211 2001 Ford Crown Victoria, s/n 2FAFP7 I WX I X 147405, license 31791D, 71,925 miles, 4 years. This patrol unit complies with our current replacement policy guidelines for police patrol vehicle , replacement at 3 years and/or 80,000 miles. During its life cycle this vehicle was involved in 4 body repair accidents and 6 PIT maneuver repairs. Electical problems became more frequent and repairs increased during its last service year. 3220 2001 Ford Crown Victoria, s/n 2FAFP71 WO1X178999, license 32514D, 74,677 miles, 4 years. This patrol unit was replaced in the 2004 budget year It did not accumulate mileage as expected in its last year of service but does comply with our current replacement policy guidelines for police patrol vehicles. 3223 2001 Ford Crown Victoria, s/n 2FAFP71WI IX147406, license 325245D, 74,047 miles, 4 years. This patrol unit was involved in 4 body repair accidents and 3 PIT maneuver damage repairs during its expected life cycle. It was replaced in the 2004 budget year and complies with our current replacement policy guidelines for police patrol vehicles. 3225 2001 Ford Crown Victoria, s/n 2FAFP71W71X147409, license 32530D, 79,510 miles, 4 years. ' During the life of this patrol unit it was involved in 3 body repair accidents, 1 PIT maneuver damage repair, and 1 prisoner caused damage repair. The repair records indicate signs of increasing electronic problems. This vehicle was replaced in 2004 budget year and complies with our current replacement policy guidelines for police patrol vehicle replacements. 3411 2000 Ford Crown Victoria, s/n 2FAFP71W9YX156896, license 29999D, 103,139 miles, 5 years. This K-9 unit has exceeded our current replacement policy guidelines for 5 years and/or 80,000 miles and has been replaced Repair records indicate this vehicle was involved in 2 PIT procedures and 1 body repair accident during its life cycle. The vehicle suspension is starting to show signs of wear and handling characteristics are slowly changing. 3804 2003 Ford Crown Victoria, s/n 2FAFP71W63X108684, license 32651D, 77,050 miles, 3 years. Repair records show that this patrol unit was damaged in 9 PIT procedures and 4 body repair accidents during its life cycle. It complies with our current replacement policy guidelines for replacement after 3 years and/or 80,000 miles. ' Mayor White and Kent City Council 2 Surplus Vehicle/Equipment ' P/Operations/Fleet/Surplus/surplus memo 11_2_05 doc 3806 2003 Ford Crown Victoria, s/n 2FAFP71W33X108688, license 32653D, 80,157 miles, 3 years. Repair records indicate this patrol unit vehicle has had 4 body repair accidents during its life cycle. Extensive rear end repairs are currently needed and would be cost prohibitive for a vehicle that has been replaced. It complies with our current replacement policy for 3 years and/or 80,000 miles. 1 3807 2003 Ford Crown Victoria, s/n 2FAFP71WX3X108686, license 35728D, 83,794 miles, 3 years. This vehicle has been in I body repair accident and 2 PIT maneuver repairs during its life cycle Just 1 prior to being removed from service the vehicle received heavy front end damage and has not been repaired. It complies with our current replacement policy for 3 years and/or 80,000 miles 3860 2003 Ford Crown Victoria, s/n 2FAHP71WX3X191061, license 36223D, 21,956 miles, 3 years. This police patrol unit was involved in an accident in April, 2004, and determined to be a "Vehicle Total" based upon the high estimated costs of repairs and the value of the vehicle. It was replaced in the 2005 ' budget year 3894 2003 Ford Crown Victoria, s/n 2FAHP71W13X191059, license 36346D, 62,423 miles, 2 years. This police patrol unit was involved in an accident on September 7, 2005, and determined to be a "Vehicle Total" based upon the high estimated costs of repairs and the value of the vehicle. It was replaced in the 2005 budget year. VANS AND SEDANS 5308 1995 Chevrolet Cargo Van, s/n 1GCEG25H4SF140953, license 18204D, 105,927 miles, 10 years. This vehicle has been assigned to the Engineering—Traffic Division since its in-service date. The van has been well used and easily complies with our current replacement policy guidelines for replacement after 10 years or 80,000 miles. 5358 1996 Ford E350 Econoline 1 Ton Cargo Van, s/n 1FTHE24H7THA93539, license 23805D, 85,122 miles, 9 years. This van has been assigned to the Public Works— Water Division since its in- service date on 5/l/96. It has begun to show signs of fatigue and repair costs are starting to increase. The vehicle complies with our current replacement policy guidelines for replacement at 10 years or 80,000 miles. 6540 1995 Ford E350 Econoline 15 Passenger Van, s/n 1FBJS31G4SHB78059, license 20611D, 73,971 miles, 10 years. This van was actively used by the Parks—Resource Center during its life cycle. Repair records show some evidence of increasing maintenance costs It was replaced and removed from service on 3/31/05 The vehicle complies with our current replacement policy for 10 years or 80,000 ' miles. 8718 1986 Ford F250 Pickup,'/4 Ton, s/n/ 1 FTHX25HOGKB09775, license D36322, 88,428 miles, 19 years Current computer records date back to 2000. It's likely that this vehicle was formally replaced in 1996 and continued as part of the motor pool since it was replaced Almost another 10 years of extended life from this vehicle but costs have started to rise and the number of repairs has increased. The vehicle is ' in need of more extensive carburetor and ignition repairs and is now scheduled for disposal. Mayor White and Kent City Council 3 Surplus Vehicle/Equipment P/Operations/F lee USurpIus/surphis memo 11_2_05 doe TRACTORS AND MOWERS 6510 1976 International Cub Tractor, s/n U24920. This tractor is almost 30 years old and was used for special ball field grounds work in the Parks Maintenance Division. It has become increasingly difficult to find parts and service for it. It was replaced and removed from service on 9/25/05. 6527 1994 Mectrac Fairway Mower, s/n 225061. This is another specialized mower used for parks , and ball field grounds maintenance work in the Parks Maintenance Division. It is becoming increasingly difficult to find parts and service for this machine and repair costs are increasing. It was replaced and removed from service on 9/26/05. 6528 1996 Jacobson Rotary Mower, s/n 2044. This mower has been assigned to the Parks Maintenance Division since its in-service date on 5/1/96. It is very difficult to find repair parts and repair costs are increasing. The mower was replaced and removed from service on 5/7/04. 6592 1999 Toro Sidewinder Fairway Mower, s/n 03201-91206. This vehicle was scheduled for replacement in 2003. It was evaluated and given an extended life cycle for replacement in 2005. The mower was replaced and removed from service on 9/14/05 and is now ready for disposal. PARTS AND MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT t Vehicle Air Conditioning Recycle Machine. RTI Refrigerant Management Center, Dual R12/R134A. This unit is obsolete and very slow. Parts are no longer available and it has been replaced. Obsolete parts. Parts originally purchased for repair and routine service of various radio and accessory equipment no longer in the fleet system Parts companies are not interested in restocking these parts The parts numbered and listed below are determined obsolete and must be surplused prior to disposal The parts will be sold as a bundle at the next annual cornucopia days sale. Part Numbers 01-0415532-00, 01-0415532-01, 0180356A96, 02-620, 02 0197, 0783946N01, 11-0039, 23-1024, 25-0691, 360RS, 399-700, 40-1284C, 500400, 500470, 500490, 501520, 6122, 6405, 7502565Y04, 7580189L03, 77402468, 8422BIl1-25, 857223, AFB-400, APDM923MUAT, ARMREST, CS11 FA3-SB, FA6, FSHK-510, HAD4008A, HAF4002A, HK-RNGR, HLN5189AR, HLN9073B, KAP-11 KE-21, KG REINSTALL, LT5200, MLPV800, PANCF25, PANCF27, R51-5040-12F, RRA491413, SLN3875A, SLN9583A, SMN402013, TLN8845A, TRN9524A, UHF-2150, XHK-SB, Z122290A, Z85591306013-01, PANCF27, LT5200, LT5100 Mayor White and Kent City Council 4 Surplus Vehicle/Equipment ' P:/Operations/Fleet/Surplus/surplus memo 11_2_05 doc i Kent City Council Meeting Qate, December 13, 2_Q05 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: DISPOSAL OF METROTECH LOCATORS —AUTHORIZE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization to declare the equipment described in the Public Works memorandum of 12/5/05 as obsolete and authorize staff to "trade in" two Metrotech 9800 utility locators, purchased approximately 10 years ago, to reduce the purchase cost of a new Metrotech utility locator t 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director's memorandum 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) L5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes No If no: ' Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund Amount $ 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds 1 - DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6Q PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Larry R Blanchard, Public Works Director Phone 253-856-5500 Fax 253-856-6500 K E N T WASH I N G 7 G N Address 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent, WA 98032-5895 DATE: November 15, 2005 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Brad Lake, Water Superintendent THROUGH. Larry Blancnard, Public Works Director ' SUBJECT: Disposal of two(2) Metrotech Locators MOTION: Recommend that the City Council authorize staff to appropriately dispose of the obsolete equipment as described in this memorandum. 1 SUMMARY: Requesting authorization to "trade in" two Metrotech 9800 utility locators purchased approximately 10 years ago, to reduce the purchase cost of a new Metrotech utility locator. BUDGET IMPACT:No Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personnel Impact BACKGROUND: The Water Division purchased two utility locators about 10 years ago for approximately $3,600.00 each from water utility funds and are planning to replace them with a new, more accurate and versatile model The supplier has agreed to reduce the $5,850 00 purchase cost of the new locator by $900 with the "trade m" of the two used utility locators The balance of the cost of the new utility locator will be shared by the Water Division, Storm/Sewer Division and Traffic Division, all of which have underground infrastructure that is located and marked with this utility locating equipment to prevent damage during excavations ' Kent City Council Meeting _.� . Date December 13, 2005 category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: STREET SWEEPING CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 4— AUTHORIZE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization for the Mayor to sign the Change ' Order No. 4 with McDounough & Sons, Inc. for a 4% increase in the monthly lump sum for the street sweeping contract upon concurrence of the language therein by the City Attorney and Public Works Director. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director's memorandum 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes X No If no• Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund Amount $ 6 CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: ' Council Agenda Item No. 6R PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Larry R Blanchard, Public Works Director Phone 253-856-5500 Fax 253-856-6500 K E N T WASHINGTON Address 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent,WA 98032-5895 DATE: November 8, 2005 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Bill Thomas, Acting Street Superintendent THROUGH: Larry Blanchard, Public Works Director LSUBJECT: Exercise City's Option 4 on Street Sweeping Contract MOTION: Recommend authorizing the Mayor to sign the Change Order No. 4 with McDonough & Sons, Inc. for a 4% increase in the monthly lump sum for the street j sweeping contract upon concurrence of the language therein by the City Attorney and Public Works Director. SUMMARY: Added fuel costs and dump fees are driving this 4 percent increase to the monthly lump sum. McDonough and Sons, Inc. has performed exceptionally throughout the current 2005 contract year I feel it would benefit the City to exercise our option for the upcoming 2006 year BUDGET IMPACT: There will be no Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personal Impact to the budget as the funding($169,863.12) will come from 2006 operating budget. BACKGROUND: McDonough & Sons. Inc. has been Contract Sweeping for The City of Kent since March I", 2002. The original Service Agreement was for 10 months with options to renew each year for up to 5 years. We are currently trying to exercise our 40' option for 2006. I believe with the rising fuel costs and dump fees a 4% is a better alternative than to open this up for all bidders. We will run into higher costs than we can get with this agreement. ' P-Tublic\Adnunistrative SupportVanet\Public Works Conunittee Meetings\2005\November 21\PW Cotntnitteesweep06 doc KENT W1111..GT0N CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 NAME OF CONTRACTOR, CONSULTANT, OR VENDOR- McDonough & Sons, Inc. ("Contractor") CONTRACT NAME &PROJECT NUMBER: Street Sweeping Contract ORIGINAL CONTRACT DATE: March 1, 2002 This Change Order amends the above-referenced contract; all other provisions of the contract that are not inconsistent with this Change Order shall remain in effect. For valuable consideration and by mutual consent of the parties, the project contract is modified as follows: 1. Section 1.1 of the Agreement, entitled "Term and Payment," is hereby modified to amend the term of the Agreement as follows: By execution of this Change Order, the parties agree that the term of the original Agreement is extended for a third, additional one-year term through December 31, 2006. The term of the original agreement expired on December 31, 2002. However, prior to its expiration, the City twice exercised its option to extend the Agreement's term through December 31, 2005. This Change Order No. 4 exercises the City's option to again extend the Agreement for an additional one-year term. In addition, the City agrees to increase the compensation due Contractor under the Agreement by four (4) percent over the prior year's rate and by an additional $17.02 per month for linear curb footage added in 2006. Also, an increase of $5.00 per hour on there extra sweep and an increase in the "Premium Sweep" from $0.007 to $0.008 per lineal foot. 2. The amount due Contractor for its performance of the Agreement is modified to amend the payment provisions under the Agreement as follows: Original Contract Sum, $12,170 monthly including applicable alternates and WSST. Net Change by Previous Change Orders $1,412.37 monthly (incl. applicable WSST) (increase due to added linear curb footage during 2003, 2004,and 2005) Current Contract Amount $13,582.37 monthly (incl Prei4ous Change Orders) (from lanunr� 1,20115.through December 31,2005) Current Change Older $543.29 monthly (four percent monthly increase) $29.60monthlh (increase due to added linear curb footage) Applicable WSST Tax on this Change Order $0 CHANGE ORDT-,R NO 2 - Pdu�o I Of 2 Revised Contract Sum $14,155.26 monthly (beginniw,.lanuary 1,2006 through December 31,2006) Original Time for Completion December 31, 2002 (insert date) Revised Completion Date December 31, 2005 Under Prior Change Orders Days Required ± for this Change Order 365 calendar days Revised Time for Completion December 31, 2006 (insert date) The extension through December 31, 2006, shall be conditioned upon the City Council's allocation of sufficient funds for Contractor's services n1 the 2006 budget. The parties whose names appear below swear under penalty of perjury that they are authorized to enter into this contract modification, which is binding on the parties of this contract IN WITNESS, the parties below have executed this Agreement, which will become effective on the last date written below. j CONTRACTOR: CITY OF KENT: By: By: (signature) (wgnatare) Print Name: Print Name: Jun White Its Its Mayor (Title) (Title) DATE: DATE: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kent City Attorney i P Operatnons\PWOpsContraeLs\Street\McDonough&SonsSheetS"epmgContmetChangeOrder3(10-041 CHANGe ORDEM NO P.tge 2 of 2 Kent City Council Meeting Date December 13�2005 C-diegbTy '- sent Calendai 1. SUBJECT: UNIVAR USA, INC 2006 WATER TREATMENT CHEMICAL CONTRACT- AUTHORIZE L2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization for the Mayor to sign the 2006 Water Treatment Chemical Supply Agreement between the City and Umvar USA, Inc. for 12 5% Sodium Hypochlorite, Potassium Permanganate, Sodium Fluoride and 25% Sodium Hydroxide. i i ' 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director's memorandum 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure9 N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes No If no: Unbudgeted Expense• Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund Amount $ 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: ' Council Agenda Item No 6S i aPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Larry R. Blanchard, Public Works Director "gooPhone 253-856-5500 KEN 7 Fax 253-856-6500 W A s H I N G T o N Address. 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent,WA.98032-5895 DATE: November 15,2006 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Larry Blanchard,Public Works Director THROUGH: Bradley Lake, Water Superintendent SUBJECT: 2006 Water Treatment Chemical Contract with Univar USA,Inc. MOTION: Recommend the council authorize the Mayor to sigin the 2006 Water Treatment Chemical Supply Agreement between the City of Kent and Univar USA, Inc. for 12.5% Sodium Hypochlorite, Potassium Pennanganate, Sodium Fluoride and 25% Sodium Hydroxide. tSUMMARY: The treatment chemicals are required to supply potable drinking water to the City's water customers Sodium Hypochlonte is used primarily as a disinfectant at a varrety of the City's well sites. Potassium Permanganate is used at the 212`" Treatment Facility as an oxidant in the removal of iron and manganese. Sodium Hydroxide is used in the water system as a pH adjustment for corrosion control. Sodium Fluoride is used to fluoridate the drinking water in an effort to help prevent dental caries in young children. BUDGET IMPACT: No Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personnel Impact as the funding ($120,245.09) would come from the 2006 operating budget. BACKGROUND: Annually the City advertises for water treatment supply chemicals to ensure a consistent cost for budgetary constraints. The use of these chemicals is required to obtain drinking water quality that meets State and Federal Regulations for drinking water standards. P/T11TIvINT/2006 Univar USA doe 1 KEN T WASHINGTGN GOODS & SERVICES AGREEMENT between the City at Kent and Univar USA Inc. THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the City of Kent, a Washington municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City"), and Univar USA Inc. organized under the laws of the State of Washington, located and doing business at E. 4515 Wisconsin, Spokane, WA 99212, Phone: (800) 541-5614/Fax: (509) 534-2468, Contact: Cliff Marier(hereinafter the "Vendor"). AGREEMENT I. DESCRIPTION OF WORK. Vendor shall provide the following goods and materials and/or perform the following services for the City: The Vendor shall be providing the City of Kent Water Department with water treatment chemicals according to the bid proposal submitted November 8, 2005, which is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference. The contract is for bid items 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 through December 31, 2006. Vendor acknowledges and understands that it is not the City's exclusive provider of these goods, materials, or services and that the City maintains its unqualified right to obtain these goods, materials, and services through other sources. II. TIME OF COMPLETION. Upon the effective date of this Agreement, Vendor shall complete the work and provide all goods, materials, and services by December 31, 2006. III. COMPENSATION. The City shall pay the Vendor an amount not to exceed One Hundred Twenty Thousand, Two Hundred Forty Five Dollars and nine cents ($120,245 09), including applicable Washington State Sales Tax, for the goods, materials, and services contemplated in this Agreement. The City shall pay the Vendor the following amounts according to the following schedule: Delivery will be scheduled upon execution of this Agreement. Vendor shall be paid after submittal.of invoice. If the City objects to all or any portion of an invoice, it shall notify Vendor and reserves the option to only pay that portion of the invoice not in dispute. In that event, the parties will immediately make every effort to settle the disputed.portion. GOODS&SERVICES AGREEMENT- 1 (Omer$10,000 00, including IVSST) A. Defective or Unauthorized Work. The City reserves its right to withhold payment from Vendor for any defective or unauthorized goods, materials or services. If Vendor is unable, for any reason, to complete any part of this Agreement, the City may obtain the goods, materials or services from other sources, and Vendor shall be liable to the City for any additional costs r: „ A incu ,� .. rred by the City �zudr«onal cons shad mean all reasonable costs, including legal costs and attorney fees, mcur-ed by the City beyond the mZaximunn Agreement price specified above_ The City further reserves its right to deduct these additional costs incurred to complete this Agreement with other sources, from any and all amounts due or to become due the Vendor. 1 B. Final Payment: Waiver of Claims THE MAKING OF FINAL PAYMENT SHALL t� CONSTITUTE A WAIVER OF CLAIMS, EXCEPT THOSE PREVIOUSLY AND PROPERLY , MADE AND IDENTIFIED BY VENDOR AS UNSETTLED AT THE TIME REQUEST FOR FINAL PAYMENT IS MADE. IV. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR The parties intend that an Independent Contractor- Employer Relationship will be created by this Agreement and that the Vendor has the ability to control and direct the performance and details of its work, the City being interested only in the results obtained under this Agreement. V. TE IAVI I A T iON. Either party may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, upon providing the other party thirty (30) days written notice at its address set forth on the signature block of this Agreement. VI. CHANGES.The City may issue a written change order for any change in the goods,materials or services to be provided during the perforniance of this Agreement. If the Vendor determines, for any reason, that a change order is necessary, Vendor must subnut a written change order request to the person listed in the notice provision section of this Agreement, section XIV(D), within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date Vendor knew or should have known of the facts and events giving rise to the requested change. If the City determines that the change increases or decreases the V endor's costs or time forperforinance,the C ity w ill make an equitable adjustment Tile City will attempt, in good faith, to reach agreement with the Vendor on all equitable adjustments. However, if the parties are unable to agree, the City will determine the equitable 0 adjustment as rt deems appropirate. The Vendor shall proceed w dln the change order work upon receiving either a written change order from the City or an oral order from the City before actually receiving the written change order. If the Vendor fails to require a change order within the time allowed, the Vendor waives its right to make any c harm or submit subsequent change order requests for that portion of the c ontract work I f the Vendor disagrees with the equitable adjustment, the Vendor must complete the change order work; however, the Vendor may elect to protest the adjustment as provided in subsections A through E of Section VII, Claims, below. The Vendor accepts all requirements of a change order by: (1) endorsing it, (2) writing a separate acceptance, or(3) not protesting in the way this section provides. A change order that is accepted by Vendor as provided in this section shall constitute full payment and final settlement of all claims for contract time and for direct, indirect and consequential costs, including costs of delays related to any work, either covered or affected by the change. VIL CLAIMS. If the Vendor disagrees with anything required by a change order, another written order, or an oral order from the City, including any direction, instruction, interpretation, or determination by the City, the Vendor may file a claim as provided in this section. The Vendor shall utve written notice to the City of all claims within fourteen (14) calendar days of the occurrence of the events giving rise to the claims, or within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date the Vendor knew or should have known of the facts or events GOODS &SERVICES AGREEMENT-2 (Omer$10,000 00, including FVSST) giving rise to the claim, whichever occurs first . Any claim for damages, additional payment for any reason, or extension of time, whether under this Agreement or otherwise, shall be conclusively deemed to have been waived by the Vendor unless a timely written claim Is made in strict accordance with the applicable provisions of this Agreement. * At a minimum, a Vendor's written claim shall include the information set forth in subsections A, items 1 i through 5 below. FAILURE TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE, WRITTEN NOTIFICATION OF CLAIM WITHIN THE TIME ALLOWED SHALL BE AN ABSOLUTE WAIVER OF ANY CLAIMS ARISING IN ANY WAY FROM THE FACTS OR EVENTS SURROUNDING THAT CLAIM OR CAUSED BY THAT DELAY. A. Notice of Claim. Provide a signed written notice of claim that provides the following infonnation 1 1. The date of the Vendor's claim; 2. The nature and circumstances that caused the claim; 3. The provisions in this Agreement that support the clams; 4. The estimated dollar cost, if any, of the claimed work and how that estimate was detenrimed; and 5. An analysis of the progress schedule showing the schedule change or disruption if the Vendor is asserting a schedule change or disruption. B. Records. The Vendor shall keep complete records of extra costs and time incurred as a result of the asserted events giving rise to the claim. The City shall have access to any of the Vendor's records needed for evaluating the protest. I The City will evaluate all claims, provided the procedures in this section are followed. If the City deteunines that a claim is valid, the City will adjust payment for wor'x or time by an equitable adjustment. No adjustment will be made for an invalid protest. C. Vendor's Duty to Complete Protested Work. In spite of any claim, the Vendor shall proceed promptly to provide the goods,materials and services required by the City under this Agreement. D. Failure to Protest Constitutes Waiver. By not protesting as this section provides, the Vendor also waives any additional entitlement and accepts from the City any written or oral order (including directions, instructions, interpretations, and determination). E. Failure to Follow Procedures Constitutes Waiver By failing to follow the procedures of this section, the Vendor completely waives any claims for protested work and accepts from the City any written or oral order(including directions, instructions, interpretations, and determination). VIII. LIMITATION OF ACTIONS. VENDOR MUST, IN ANY EVENT, FILE ANY LAWSUIT ARTSING FROM OR CONNECTED WITH THIS AGREEMENT WITHIN 120 CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE DATE THE CONTRACT WORK IS COMPLETE OR VENDOR'S ABILITY TO FILE THAT SUIT SHALL BE FOREVER BARRED. THIS SECTION FURTHER LIMITS ANY APPLICABLE STATUTORY LIMITATIONS PERIOD. IX. WARRANTY. This Agreement is subject to all warranty provisions established under the Umfornn Commercial Code, Title 62A, Revised Code of Washington. Vendor warrants goods are 1 GOODS&SERVICES AGREEMENT-3 (Over$10,000 00. tnclu&ng JVSST) merchantable, are fit for the particular purpose for which they were obtained, and will perform in accordance with their specifications and Vendor's representations to City. The Vendor shall correct all defects in workmanship and materials within one (1) year from the date of the City's acceptance of the Contract work. In the event any part of the goods are repaired, only original replacement parts shall be used—rebuilt or used parts will not be acceptable. When defects are corrected, the warranty for that portion of the work shall extend for t aC tiie i year from tuC date 3uCr COITeC Cr 1S completed aluCepe Jy tle Clty. ,l.e v.eiu,.r shall J CgL^ .O correct any defects within seven (7) calendar days of its receipt of notice from the City of the defect. IF -te Vendor does not accomplish the corrections within a reasonable time as detennmed by the City, the City may complete the corrections and the Vendor shall pay all costs incurred bythe City in order to accomplish the correction. X. DISCRIMINATION. In the hiring of employees for the performance of work under tlus Agreement or any sub-contract, the Vendor, its sub-contractors, or any person acting on behalf of the Vendor or sub-contractor shall not, by reason of race, religion, color, sex, age, sexual orientation, national origin, or the presence of any sensory, i-nental, or physical disability, discriminate against any person, who is qualified and , available to perforin the work to which the employment relates Vendor shall execute the attached City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Policy Declaration, Comply with City Administrative Policy 1.2, and upon completion of the contract work, file the attached Compliance Statement. XI. INDEMNIFICATION. Vendor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers hanrrless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, arising out of or in corinection with the Vendor's performance of this Agreement, except for that portion of the injuries and damages caused by the City's negligence The City's inspection or acceptance of any of Vendor's work when completed shall not be grounds to avoid any of these covenants of indemlufrcation. IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE EINDEMNIFICATION P ROVIDED H ERE1N C ONSTITUTES T HE V ENDOR'S W AIVER O F IMMUNITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE, TITLE 51 RCW, SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS INDEMNIFICATION. THE PARTIES FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED THIS WAIVER. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. XII. INSURANCE. The Vendor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance of the types and in the amounts described in Exhibit B attached and incorporated by this reference. XIII. WORK PERFORMED AT VENDOR'S RISK. Vendor shall take all necessary precautions and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and subcontractors in the performance of the contract work and shall utilize all protection necessary for that purpose All work shall be done at Vendor's own risk, and Vendor shall be responsible for any loss of or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in connection with the work. XIV. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. A. Recvclable Materials. Pursuant to Chapter 3.80 of the Kent City Code, the City requires its contractors and consultants to use recycled and recyclable products whenever practicable. A price preference may be available for any designated recycled product GOODS &SERVICES AGREEMENT-4 , (Ovei $10,000 00. including WSST) B. Non-Waiver of Breach. The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, or to exercise any option conferred by this Agreement (it one or mare instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of those covenants, agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect. C. Resolution of Disputes and Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. If the parties are unable to settle any dispute, difference or claim arising front the parties' performance of this Agreement, the exclusive means of resolving that dispute, difference or claim, shall only be by filing suit exclusively under the venue, rules and jurisdiction of the King County Superior Court, King County, Washington, unless the parties agree in writing to an alternative dispute resolution process In any claim or lawsuit for damages arising from the parties' performance of this Agreement, each party shall pay all its legal costs and attorney's fees incurred in defending or bringing such claim or lawsuit, in addition to any other recovery or award provided by law; provided, however, nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to hunt the City's right to iandermnification under Section XI of this Agreement D. Written Notice. All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the parties at the addresses listed on the signature page of the Agreement, unless notified to the contrary. Any written notice hercunder shall becomc effective three (3) business days after the date of mailing by registered or certified mail, and snail be ueerneu sufficiently given if sent tv- the addressee at the address stated in thus r�gr eiue, t , s,..,.t other address as may be hereafter specified in writing. E. Assignment. Any assignment of this Agreement by either party without the written consent of the non-assigning party shall be void If the non-assigning party gives its consent to any assignment, the terms of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and no further assignment shall be madc without additional written consent. F. Modification. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the City and Vendor. G. Entire Agreement. The written provisions and terms of this Agreement, together with any Exhibits attached hereto, shall supersede all prior verbal statements of any officer or other representative of the City, and such statements shall not be effective or be construed as entering into or forming a part of or altering in any manner this Agreement All of the above documents are hereby made a part of this Agreement. However, should any language in any of the Exhibits to this Agreement conflict with any language contained in this Agreement, the tents of this Agreement shall prevail. H. Compliance with Laws. The Vendor agrees to comply with all federal, state, and municipal laws,rules, and regulations that are now e ffective o r i n the future b ecome applicable to Vendor's b usiness, equipment, and personnel engaged in operations covered by this Agreement or accruing out of the performance of those operations. 1 GOODS &SERVICES AGREEMENT-5 (Over$10,000 00, enchlding WSST) IN WITNESS, the parties below execute this Agreement,which shall become effective on the fast date entered below. VENDOR: CITY OF ' +NT: By: By: I (sr;nnture) (sronrarnr e) Print Name: Print Name: Jim White Its Its Mayor (Tale) DATE: DATE: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: VENDOR: CITY OF KENT: Cliff Mader Larry R. Blanchard ' Univar USA Inc. City of Kent E. 4515 Wisconsin 220 Fourth Avenue South Spokane, WA 99212 Kent, WA 98032 (800) 541-5614 (telephone) (253) 856-5500 (telephone) (509) 534-2468 (facsimile) (253) 856-6500 (facsimile) I APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kent Law Department Unrvai -2006 Water Treatment Chemic Baucr i t t 1 1 GOODS&SERVICES AGREEMENT-6 (Orel "10,000 00, including WSST) DECLARATION CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY The City of Kent is committed to conform to Federal and State laws regarding equal opportunity. As such all contractors, subcontractors and suppliers who perform work with relation to this Agreement shall comply with the regulations of the City's equal employment opportunity policies. The following questions specifically identify the requirements the City deerns necessary for any contractor, subcontractor or supplier on this specific Agreement to adhere to An aff ri native response is required on ant of the following questions for this Agreement to be valid and binding. If any contractor, subcontractor or supplier willfully misrepresents themselves with regard to the directives outlines, it will be considered a breach of contract and it will be at the City's sole determination regarding suspension or termination for all or part of the Agreement; The questions are as follows: 1. I have read the attached City of Kent administrative policy number 1.2. 2. During the time of this Agreement I will not discriminate in employment on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, age, or the presence of all sensory, mental or physical disability 3. During the time of this Agreement the prime contractor will provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer. 4. During the time of the Agreement I, the prime contractor, will actively consider luring and promotion of women and minorities. 5. Before acceptance of this Agreement, an adherence statement will be signed by nne, the Prime Contractor, that the Prime Contractor complied with the requirements as set forth above. By signing below, I agree to fulfill the five requirements referenced above. Dated this day of , 2.00_ By: For: Title: Date: I 1 EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS- 1 of 3 CITY OF KENT ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY 1 NUMBER: 1.2 EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 1998 SUBJECT: MINORITY AND WOMEN SUPERSEDES: April 1, 1996 CONTRACTORS APPROVED BY Jim White, Mayor POLICY: Equal employment opportunity requirements for the City of Kent will conform to federal and state laws. All contractors, subcontractors, consultants and suppliers of the City must guarantee equal employment opporhmity .'n_:_, 1.eir o a 1 1.1- p ee t with � City a.nlnniitiyo 1 Q� (� 000 n l Wiutui tuciu nr�amZa�ivni and, If ilCiui,I� 1�.gi".,:.fn@n1.S 4iL1n the �..t� _n y`1J,.. T more Wltb_1n any given year, must take the following affirmative steps: 1. Provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer. 2. Actively consider for promotion and advancement available minorities and women. Any contractor, subcontractor, consultant or supplier who willfully disregards the City's nondiscrimination and equal opportunity requirements shall be considered in breach of contract and subject to suspension or termination for all or part of the Agreement. Contract Compliance Officers will be appointed by the Directors of Planning, Parks, and Public Works Departments to assume the following duties for their respective departments. 1. Ensuring that contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and suppliers subject to these regulations are familiar with the regulations and the City's equal employment opportunity policy. 2. Monitoring to assure adherence to federal, state and local laws,policies and guidelines. l EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS-2 of 3 CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMPLIANCE STATEMENT This fora► shall be filled out AFTER COMPLETION of this project by the Contractor awarded the Agreement. I I, the undersigned, a duly represented agent of Company, hereby acknowledge and declare that the before-mentioned company was the prime contractor for the Agreement known as that was entered into on the (date, between the firm I represent and the City of Kent. I declare that I complied fully with all of the requirements and obligations as outlined in the City of Kent Administrative Policy 1.2 and the Declaration City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Policy that was part of the before-mentioned Agreement. Dated this day of ,200_ By: For: Title: Date: EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS-3 of X EXHIBIT A { 1 t I 1 i t i I 1 1 1 WATER TREATMENT CHEMICAL PROPOSAL >~OMI The undersigned hereby proposes to provide all equipment, labor, materials and supplies to perform the service t a$ spCC:{ICd 1G th,� r��j�tr:1lt{CAL t1iY fntlnn�ing{P�g Bidder' N,Li re: --_ tem Esturnated Desciiptiou Bid Unit Total Annual Unit Prices Usage 6 60,000 Sodium Fluoride in 50 Lb_ Bags C4 LBS FQB LB Total $ I Company Submitting Proposal Autborrzed igr�ature Note: Contractor urrrst submit a firrrr prolaosal for the corrfract feetrr(s). WATER` RE,TRE,ATM Eft T C,I T,NTICAL SUPPLY FOR 2006 PROPOSAL FORM 'Flic undersigned liereby proposes to provide all equipment, labor, materials and supplies to peifoun the service as speciiied hatlus contract for the following, fees. iT irt;<er' 1 anise: [loin Estimated Descriptiort Bid Unit Total Am!Fla! Unit Prices Usage S 1,000 12 1/2% Sod twu Iaypochloute in $ 7 $ GALS 500 to 999 Gal. Deliveries BULK GAL. FOB 212th St. Treatment Plant 1 Total $ l UNIVAR Company Submitting Proposal Authoh ize �SiiaYure Note: Contractor Hurst subunit a finis proposal for the contract tertn(S). WATER TREATMENT CI' +NITCAL SUPPLY FOR 2006 PROPOSAL FORM The undersioaed herebyxo oses to provide all ec to tnent labor, materials and supplies to perforni the service 1 P P 1 P � 11 1 as --citied m this contract for tl,e followin- fees: Bidder' Nafue: Item Estiarated Descriptiou Bid Unit Total Annual Unit Prices Usage _ U5 10 1,000 Potassium Permanganate in $ /, "=� $ LES 50 to 55 Lb. Uruins LB. FOB 212th St. Treatment Plant n3 Sub Total $ v 8.8% WA State Sales Tax U r/ Total $ l'i (vo- UNAdBIL 1 Company Submitting Proposal / 1 Authoria"CM Signature Note: Contractor roast submit a firm proposal for the contract tertn(s). WATER TREATMENT CHEMICAL SUPPLY FOR 2006 PROPOSAL POR1V>< The undeisigmed hereby proposes to provide all equipment, labor, materials and supplies to perfotin the servicc as specified in this contract for the following fees: Bidder'Name: Item Estimated Description Bid Unit Total Annual Unit Prices Usage 11 95,000 25% Sodium Hydroxide in S S GALS 4.000 io 5,000 Oral, Deliveries BULK GAL FOB Pump Station#5 Total $ 1 V TAR Con-jpany Submitting Proposal &��'— Authori igna re Note., Contractor must submit a firm proposal for the contract ternt(s). tb@/I0 39t1d 3Na>(UdS 8VAIN t 84bZ-17£5-605 Zb:bT 9@@Z/8@iLL WATER TREATTVIENT CHEMICAL SUPPLY Y PROPOSAL FO"T The undersigned hereby proposes to provide all equipment, labor,materials and supplies to perform the service as specifitJ L1 11ie5 contraCt rv,the fnllowma foes- 13idder'Name: 1 Itein Estimated bescriptioa Bid Chit Total A4.unual Unit Prices rlsaEe 12 10,000 25%Sodium Hydroxide in S , ' P $ j GALS 4,000 to 5,000 Gal. deliveries IBULK GAL. FOB East Hill Well Total S m UNNAR Company Submitting Proposal Authoriz d Signature Note: Coxctraetar rrzusi srebxrrif a ftrrri prap/isal for tlxe COYxt�"act terxxr(S). bo/Z0 397d 3Ndx0JS ZJVAIFn 89bZ-h£9-609 Zb bT 900Z/8©/ii WATER TREATMENT CHEMICAL SUPPLY FOR 2006 PROPOSAL FORM 7he undersigned hereby proposes to provide all equipment, labor,materials and supplies to pert'oirn tfle service as specified in this contract for The following tees: Bidder' ]Name: Item Estimated Description Bid Unit Total Annual Unit Pric:,s Usage 13 2,000 25%Sodiiini Hydroxide S o g/ S GALS 41000 Gal. Deliveries BULK GAL. FOB 212th Treatment Plant Total a m UNWWR Company Subriritting Proposal AuthorizJz igi Note: Cotatructor must subunit a firm proposal for the contract term(s). b0/E0 39Vd 3NVAOdS WAImn 897Z-bE5-609 Zb:Vi 500Z/801TL WATERT"ATTV ENT CHEMICAL SUPPLY kook :uuu -- PROPOSAL FORM I The undersigned hereby proposes to provide all Pquipment, labor,materials and supplies to perform the seiv[ce as speci ied ai this coutaac,t iur the .ollaw° ,'ng Lees• IWdcler' Narne; (tern estimated Description laid plait 'Total Aaaual Unit prices Usage 14 2,000 25%Sodium Hydroxide S a '� $ GALS. 1,000 to 4,000 Gal, Deliveries BULK GAL. FOB 212th Treatment plant TotalCo $ r� UNIV.AR Con-ipany Submitting Proposal Au40riZ � ure Note: Contractor must subitrit a frrm proposal for the contract ternz(s). b0/70 39Vd 3NV>UdS NVAINn 897Z-P69-609 67:01 500Z/80/11 I EXHIBIT B INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR SERVICE COINT7rACT S Insurance The Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, their agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors A. Minimum Scope of Insurance Contractor shall obtain insurance of the types described below: 1. Automobile Liability insurance covering all owned, non-owned, hired and leased vehicles Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary,the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage. 2. Comrnercral General Liability insurance shall be written on ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors,products-completed operations, personal miiury and advertising injury, and liability assuuied under an insured contract.The Cormmercial General Liability insurance shall be endorsed to provide the Aggregate Per Project Endorsement ISO form CG 25 03 11 85 There shall be no endorsement or modification of the Commercial General Liability insurance for liability arising from explosion, collapse or underground property damage. The City shall be named as an insured under the Contractor's Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed for the City using ISO additional insured endorsement CG 20 10 11 85 or a substitute endorsement providing equivalent coverage. 3. Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial hlsurance laws of the State of Washington. B. Minimum Amounts of Insurance Contractor shall maintain the following insurance limits: 1. Automobile Liabil�insurance with a minimum combined single limit for bodily injuny and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident. 2. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written Nvith limits no less than$1,000,000 each occuirence, $1,000,000 general aggregate and a $1,000,000 products-completed operations aggregate limit. EXHIBIT B (Continued) C. Other Insurance Provisions The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions for Automobile Liability and Commercial General Liability insurance: 1. The Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respect the City. Any Insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it 2. The Contractor's insurance shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be cancelled by either party, except after thirty(30) days prior written notice by certified mail,return receipt requested, has been given to the City. 3. The City of Kent shall be named as an additional insured on all policies (except Professional Liability) as respects work performed by or on behalf of the contractor and a copy of the endorsement raining the City as additional insured shall be attached to the Ceitlf Cate of insurance. Tire Ct y rase.Je3 the right to receive a certified copy of all required insurance policies. The Contractor's Commercial General Liability insurance shall also contain a clause stating that coverage shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respects to the limits of the insurer's liability. D. Acceptability of Insurers Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than A:VII. E. Verification of Coverage Contractor shall funush the City with original certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insuurance requirements of the Contractor before commencement of the work. F. Subcontractors Contractor shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the same tusurance requirements as stated herein for the Contractor. Kent City Council Meeting Date December 13, 2005 ategoiT Consent Calenaar 1. SUBJECT: JCI JONES CHEMICAL, INC. 2006 WATER TREATMENT CHEMICAL CONTRACT — AUTHORIZE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization for the Mayor to sign the 2006 Water Treatment Chemical Supply Agreement between the City and JCI Jones Chemicals, Inc. for gas chlorine. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director's memorandum 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes No If no: Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund Amount $ 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6T PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Larry R. Blanchard, Public Works Director • Phone:253-856-5500 11INZ K E N T Fax: 253-856-6500 W A 5 H I N G T O N Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent,WA 98032-5895 DATE: November 15,2006 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Larry Blanchard, Public Works Director THROUGH. Bradley Lake, Water Supertutendent SUBJECT: 2006 Water Treatment Chemical Contract with JCI Jones Chemicals, Inc. MOTION: Recommend that the council authorize the Mayor to sign the 2006 Water Treatment Chemical Supply Agreement between the City of Kent and JCI .tones Chemicals, hie for gas chlorine SUMMARY: Gas Chlorine is used to disinfect the City's water supply system at a variety of well and spring sites. BUDGET IMPACT: No Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personnel Impact as the funding ($28,290.00) would come from the 2006 operating budget. }` BACKGROUND: Annually the City advertises for water treatment supply chemicals to ensure a consistent cost for budgetary constraints. The use of these chemicals is required to obtain drinking water quality that meets State and Federal Regulations for drinking water standards. P 1TRTMNT12006JCI Jones doe i OOVZA KENT Y/ASMIHGTO" GOODS & SERVICES AGREEMENT between the City of Relit and JCI Jones Chemicals, Inc. THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the City of Kent, a Washington municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City"), and JCI Jones Chemicals, Inc. organized under the laws of the State of Washington, located and doing business at 1919 Marine View Drive, Tacoma, WA 98422, (253) 274-0104/Fax. (253) 274- 0733, Contact: Scott Donahoe(hereinafter the "Vendor"). AGREEMENT I. DESCRIPTION OF WORK. Vendor shall provide the following goods and materials and/or perform the following services for the City: The Vendor shall be providing the City of Kent Water Department with water treatment chemicals according to the bid proposal submitted November 8, 2005, which is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference. The contract is for bid items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 through December 31, 2006. Vendor acknowledges and understands that it is not the City's exclusive provider of these goods, materials, or services and that the City maintains its unqualified right to obtain these goods, materials, and services tlnough other sources. II. TIME OF COMPLETION. Upon the effective date of this Agreement, Vendor shall complete the work and provide all goods, materials, and services by December 31, 2006. III. COMPENSATION. The City shall pay the Vendor an amount not to exceed Twenty Eight Thousand, Two Hundred Ninety Dollars ($28,290.00), including applicable Washington State Sales Tax, for the goods, materials, and services contemplated in this Agreement. The City shall pay the Vendor the following amounts according to the follownig schedule: Delivery will be scheduled upon execution of this Agreement. Vendor shall be paid after submittal of invoice. If the City objects to all or any portion of an invoice, it shall notify Vendor and reserves the option to only pay that portion of the invoice not in dispute. In that event, the parties will inunediately nnake every effort to settle the disputed portion. GOODS &SERVICES AGREEMENT- I (Over$10,000 00, including IVSS7) A. Defective or Unauthorized Work. The City reserves its right to withhold payment from Vendor for any defective or unauthorized goods, materials or services. If Vendor is unable, for any reason, to complete any part of this Agreement, the City may obtain the goods, materials or services from other sources, and Vendor shall be liable to the City for ally additional costs incun-ed by the City. "Additional costs" shall mean all reasonable costs,-including-legal costs and attorney fees, incurred by the City beyond the maximum Agreement price specified above. The City further reserves its right to deduct these additional costs incurred to complete this Agreement with other sources, from any and al amounts due or to become due the Vendor. B. Final Payment- Waiver of Claims. THE MAKING OF FINAL PAYMENT SHALL CONSTITUTE A WAIVER OF CLAIMS, EXCEPT THOSE PREVIOUSLY AND PROPERLY MADE AND IDENTIFIED BY VENDOR AS UNSETTLED AT THE TIME REQUEST FOR FINAL PAYMENT IS MADE. IV. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The parties intend that an Independent Contractor- Employer Relationship will be created by this Agreement and that the Vendor has the ability to control and direct the performance and details of its work, the City being interested only in the results obtained under this Agreement. 1 V. TERMINATION. Either party may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, upon providing the other patty thirty (30) days written notice at its address set forth on the signature block of this Agreement. VI. CHANGES. The City may issue a written change order for any change in the goods, materials or services to be provided during the performance of this Agreement_ If the Vendor determines, for any reason, that a change order is necessary, Vendor must submit a written change order request to the person listed in the notice provision section of this Agreement, section XIV(D), within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date Vendor knew or should have known of the facts and events giving rise to the requested change If the City determines that t he change i nereases o r d ecreases the V endor's c osts o r t ime f or p erfornance, the C rty w ill make an equitable adjustment. The City will attempt, in good faith, to reach agreement with the Vendor on all equitable adjustments. However, if the parties are unable to agree, the City will determine the equitable adjustment as it deems appropriate. The Vendor shall proceed with the change order work upon receiving either a written change order from the City or an oral order from the City before actually receiving the written change order. If the Vendor fails to require a change order within the time allowed, the Vendor waives its right to nmakc any c lain or submit subsequent change order requests for that portion of the c ontract work I f the Vendor disagrees with the equitable adjustment, the Vendor must complete the change order work, however, the Vendor may elect to protest the adjustment as provided in subsections A tluough E of Section VII, Claims, below. The Vendor accepts all requirements of a change order by: (1) endorsing it, (2) writing a separate acceptance, or(3) not protesting in the way this section provides. A change order that is accepted by Vendor as provided in this section shall constitute full payment and final settlement of all claims for contract time and for direct, indirect and consequential costs, including costs of delays related to any work, either covered or affected by the change. VII. CLAVNIS. If the Vendor disagrees with anything required by a change order, another written order, or an oral order fioin the City, umcludrng any direction, instruction, interpretation, or determination by the City, the Vendor may file a claim as provided in this section_ The Vendor shall give written notice to the City of all claims within fourteen (14) calendar days of the occurrence of the events giving rise to the claims, or within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date the Vendor knew or should have known of the facts or events GOODS &SERVICES AGREEMENT-2 (Over S10,000 00, including WSW) giving rise to the claim, whichever occurs first . Any clans for damages, additional payment for any reason, or extension of time, whether under this Agreement of otherwise, shall be conclusively deemed to have been waived by the Vendor unless a timely written claim is made in strict accordance with the applicable provisions of this Agreement. At a minimum, a Vendor's written claim shall include the information set forth in snhsections A,items 1 through 5 below FAILURE TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE, WRITTEN NOTIFICATION OF CLAIM WITHIN THE TIME ALLOWED SHALL BE AN ABSOLUTE WAIVER OF ANY CLAIMS ARISING IN ANY WAY FROM THE FACTS OR EVENTS SURROUNDING THAT CLAIM OR CAUSED BY THAT DELAY. A. Notice of Clain. Provide a signed written notice of claim that provides the following information 1. The date of the Vendor's claim; 2. The nature and circumstances that caused the claim; 3. The provisions in tlus Agreement that support the clams; 4. The estimated dollar cost, if any, of the clauned work and how that estimate was determined; and 5. An analysis of the progress schedule showing the schedule change or disruption if the Vendor is asserting a schedule change or disruption. B. Records. The Vendor shall keep complete records of extra costs and time incurred as a result of the asserted events giving rise to the claim. The City shall have access to any of the Vendor's records needed for evaluating the protest. The City will evaluate all claims, provided the procedures in this section are followed If the City determines that a claim is valid, the City will adjust payment for work or time by an equitable adjustment. No adjustment will be made for an invalid protest. C. Vendor's Duty to Complete Protested Work. In spite of any claim, the Vendor shall proceed promptly to provide the goods, materials and services required by the City under this Agreement. D. Failure to Protest Constitutes Waiver. By not protesting as this section provides, the Vendor also waives any additional entitlement and accepts from the City any written or oral order(including directions, instructions, interpretations, and determination). E. Failure to Follow Procedures Constitutes Waiver. By failing to follow the procedures of this section, the Vendor completely waives any claims for protested work and accepts from the City any written or oral order(including directions, instniettons, interpretations, and detennination). VHL LIMITATION OF ACTIONS. VENDOR MUST, IN ANY EVENT, FILE ANY LAWSUIT ARISING FROM OR CONNECTED WITH THIS AGREEMENT WITHIN 120 CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE DATE THE CONTRACT WORK IS COMPLETE OR VENDOR'S ABILITY TO FILET HAT SUIT SHALL BE FOREVER BARRED. THIS SECTION FURTHER LIMITS ANY APPLICABLE STATUTORY LIMITATIONS PERIOD. IX. WARRANTY. This Agreement is subject to all warranty provisions established under the Uniform Cormmercial Code, Title 62A, Revised Code of Washington. Vendor warrants goods are GOODS&SERVICES AGREEMENT- (Over$10,000 00, Including WSST) merchantable, are fit for the particular purpose for which they were obtained, and will perform in accordance with their specifications and Vendor's representations to City. The Vendor shall correct all defects in workmanship and materials within one (1) year from the date of the City's acceptance of the Contract work In the event any part of the goods are repaired, only original replacement parts shall be used—rebuilt or used parts will not be acceptable. When defects are corrected, the warranty for that portion of the work shall extend for mne r,> e r Hie d lei a and d b the City. The Vendor shall be&-�» to vi��. kiI `y.,..r uvini ui�. ale SUCK .,vrreC,loin 1S CCIiIp.�.f d uii accepted y &,., correct any defects within sever: (71 calendar days of its receipt of notice from the City of the defect If rbe Vendor does not accomplish the corrections within a reasonable time as deternuned by the City, the City may complete the corrections and the Vendor shall pay all costs incurred by the City in order to accomplish the ' correction. X. DISCRIMINATION. In the hiring of employees for the performance of work under this Agreement or any sub-contract, the Vendor, its sub-contractors, or any person acting on behalf of the Vendor or sub-contractor shall not, by reason of race, religion, color, sex, age, sexual orientation, national origin, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability, discriminate against any person who is qualified and 4 available to perform the work to which the employment relates I Vendor shall execute the attached City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Policy Declaration, Comply with City Administrative Policy 1.2, and upon completion of the contract work, file the attached Compliance Statement. XL INDEMNIFICATION. Vendor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the Vendor's performance of this Agreement, except for that portion of the injuries and damages caused by the City's negligence The City's inspection or acceptance of any of Vendor's work when completed shall not be grounds to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification. IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE INDEMNIFICATION P ROV IDED H EREIN C ONSTITUTES T HE V ENDOR'S W A]V ER O F IMMUNITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE, TITLE 51 RCW, SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS INDEMNIFICATION. THE PARTIES FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED THIS WAIVER. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. i XII. INSURANCE. The Vendor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance of the types and in the amounts described in Exhibit B attached and incorporated by this reference. XIII. WORK PERFORMED AT VENDOR'S RISK Vendor shalt take all necessary precautions and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and subcontractors in the performance of the contract work and shall utilize all protection necessary for that purpose. All work shalt be done at Vendor's oven risk, and Vendor shall be responsible for any loss of or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in connection with the work. XIV. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. A Recyclable Materials. Pursuant to Chapter 3.30 of the Kent City Code, the City requires its contractors and consultants to use recycled and recyclable products whenever practicable. A price preference may be available for any designated recycled product. GOODS&SERVICES AGREEMENT-4 (Over$10,000 00, including WSST) B. Non-Waiver of Breach. The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, or to exercise any option confemTed by this Agreement in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of those covenants, agreements or options, and the saine sliall be and remain in full force and effect. C. Resolution of Disputes and Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. If the parties are unable to settle any dispute, difference or claii arising fiom the parties' performance of this Agreement, the exclusive means of resolving that dispute, difference or claim, shall only be by filing suit exclusively under the venue,rules and jurisdiction of the King County Superior Covet, King County, Washington, unless the parties agree in writing to an alternative dispute resolution process. In any claim or lawsuit for damages arising from the parties' performance of this Agreement, each party shall pay all its legal costs and attoiney's fees incurred in defending or bringing such clai n or lawsuit, in addition to any other recovery or award provided by law; provided, however, nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit the City's right to indemnification under Section XI of this Agreement. D Written Notice. All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the parties at the addresses listed on the signature page of the Agreemment, unless notified to the contiary Any written notice hereunder shall become effective three(3) business days after the date of mailing by registered or certified mail, and shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing. E. Assignment Any assignment of this Agreement by either party without the written consent of the non-assigning party shall be void. If the non-assigning party gives its consent to any assignment, the tens of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and no further assignment shall be made without additional written consent. F. Modification. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions of tlus Agreement shall be binding Unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the City and Vendor. G. Entire Agreement. The written provisions and terms of this Agreement, together with any Exhibits attached hereto, shall supersede all prior verbal statements of any officer or other representative of the City, and such statements shalt not be effective or be construed as entering into or forming a part of or altering in any manner this Agreement. All of the above documents are hereby made a part of this Agreement. However, should any language in any of the Exhibits to this Agreement conflict with any language contained in this Agreement, the temis of this Agreement shall prevail. H. Compliance with Laws. The Vendor agrees to comply with all federal, state, and municipal laws, rules, and regulations that are now e ffective or i it the future become applicable to Vendor's business, equipment, and personnel engaged in operations covered by this Agucennent or accruing out of the performance of those operations GOODS&SERVICES AGREEMENT-5 (Over S10,000 00, incliuluig WSST) IN WITNESS, the parties below execute this Agreement, which shall become effective oil the last date entered below. VENDOR: CITY OF KENT: -� By. I3y (signnha e) (Signature) Print Name: Print Name: .Tim White Its Its Mayor DATE. DATE: ' NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: VENDOR: CITY OF KENT: Scott Donahoe Larry R. Blanchard JCI Jones Chemicals, Inc. City of Kent 1919 MArine View Drive 220 Fourth Avenue South Tacoma,WA 98422 Kent, WA 98032 (253) 274-0104 (telephone) (253) 856-5500 (telephone) (253) 274-0733 (facsimile) (253) 856-6500 (facsimile) APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kent Law Department Z 10 [ones Chemicals,Inc -2006 Watei rreatmentChemicals/Bauer GOODS&SERVICES AGREEMENT-6 (Over$10,000 00, including WSSP) DECLARATION CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY The City of Kent is cominitted to confornn to Federal and State laws regarding equal opportunity. As such all contractors, subcontractors and suppliers who perform work with relation to this Agreement shall comply witli the regulations of the Cnty's equal employment opportunity policies. The following questions specifically identify the requirements the City deems necessary for any contractor, subcontractor or supplier on this specific Agreement to adhere to An affitinative response is required on all of the following-questions for this Agreement to be valid and binding If an_v contractor, subcontractor or supplier willfully nuSrepreserts themselves with regard to the directives outlines, it will be considered a breath of contract and it will be at the Crty's sole determination regarding suspension or termination for all or part of the Agreement; The questions are as follows: 1. I have read the attached City of Kent administrative policy number 1.2. 2. During the time of thus Agreement I will not discriminate in employment on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, age, or the presence of all sensory, mental or pl?ysrcal disability. 3. During the time of this Agreement the prime contractor will provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer. 4. During the time of the Agreement I, the prime contractor, will actively consider hiring and promotion of women and minorities. 5. Before acceptance of this Agreement, an adherence statement will be signed by me, the Prime Contractor, that the Prime Contractor complied with the requirements as set forth above. By signing below, I agree to fulfill the five requirements referenced above. Dated this day of , 200 . By: ' For: Title: Date: EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS- I of 3 CITY OF KENT ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY NUMBER: 1.2 EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 1998 SUBJECT: MINORITY AND WOMEN SUPERSEDES: April 1, 1996 CONTRACTORS APPROVED BY hni'Whne, Mayor POLICY: Equal employment opportunity requirements for the City of Kent will conform to federal and state laws. AlI contractors, subcontractors, consultants and suppliers of the City must guarantee equal employment opportunity within their organization and, if bolding Agreements with the City amounting to $10,000 or more within any given year, must take the following affnanative steps: 1. Provide a written statement to ail new employees and subcontractors indicating cotnnutrnent as an equal opportunity employer. 2. Actively consider for promotion and advancement available minorities and women. Any contractor, subcontractor, consultant or supplier who willfully disregards the City's nondiscrimination and equal opportunity requirements shall be considered in breach of contract and subject to suspension or termination for all or part of the Agreement. Contract Compliance Officers will be appointed by the Directors of Planning, Parks, and Public Works Depm-Lments to assume the following duties for their respective departments. 1. Ensuring that contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and suppliers subject to these regulations are familiar with the regulations and the City's equal employment opportunity 2. Monitoring to assure adherence to federal, state and local laws, policies and guidelines. f EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS-2 of 3 , CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMPLIANCE STATEMENT This form shall be filled out AFTER COMPLETION of this project by the Contractor awarded the Agreement. I, the undersigned, a duly represented agent of Company, hereby acknowledge and declare that the before-mentioned company was the prime contractor for the Agreement known as that was entered into on the (date) , between the fine I represent and the City of Kent. I declare that I complied fully with all of the requirements and obligations as outlined in the City of Kent Administrative Policy 1.2 and the Declaration City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Policy that was part of the before-mentioned Agreement. Dated this day of 1200 . By: For: Title: Date: EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS-3 of 3 � EXHIBIT A l i S I I I 1 � l V i EI 3� ^- T (`e + - n :) e r : OF .� !-�`?<'.v,.2. `�'I�LE1'�'!��i�,�� 4 t'tz,![�t,CC.;�pa. .�IT: �' _.'�: �•C,I�, L(�l,u Pliop000rk ML The undci�iened hereby piopnscs to prov[de all eqrnlmnent_ labor, materials and czupphc5 to perform the scrrtce .;s spenfirtl n 11ris c"Im-.ret for Lhe follov,im, Cues_ Name: JCi nIeti -ays,_I;1C ----- — ------- -- --- ttCtrx F'��,i����t-tv_t c;ct'itiEi� [t Y�rF Unit Fetal Amxual � LTf;it Prices i ic:t�e 1 5 Chlorine Gas in One-Ton C'ontaincrs l S525,00 /ton S 2,625.00 TORTS FOB Clark Spim-gs T0;,; CONT Total $2,625.00 JCI Jones Chemicals,_Inc. C'orupany SubmittmL Propos.d ALIth0117ed Signatute mofC': fJfFtt'LE%"t(1t'Itt CfSP�:'f�J:1Fi !fo ff'f.'2�+JSE�f3C+,s!f� G't'CrtC C(1ItfP!tCt•tgF-;;t ES'�, 1 ,ire 'I Tt t� t'�zl',il'k' C liC_iL SUPPLY %lit(i i"vopos«l. FO RNf I'll IIndcrsrgncd hcrcb} proposes to hro�,ik� al equilimcm, laboi, mafcrtals and supplies to perfoHn tote serf icc s spCC1 cd rtl 0r15 C^,l I ICT t r fl— foltC ww' lcc'S iliddcr.•'' i`�fun4e: Jt�i JcrEs_Crnen3icais, Inc._ .� — _�__._ _-- item Esuniated Descupiror 13id Cntt Total AmmA Unit pru es -- 3 5 Chlorinr. Gas in One-Ton Containers 1 S 525.00 /ton S 2,625.00 TONS FOB Kent Springs TONI CONT. Total 52-625.00 --- JCI Jones Chemicals, Inc. Comix"lly Subrnitun, Proposal Authorized Signature Arote: Contractor truest submit a firFra Proposal for the confract terrrt(s). -I VA IE', life,A L Sij t_ IiL V\3R 201 6 'hc undcisiLnwd hereby proposes to provide all equipnlcllt, Labor, materials and supplies to pedorm thie s.rvie_l as Specilicu I11 tills coFalact cr I'lc !011lo-wlajcc;: rd€ci-' Nam. - Xl Jones_Chemicais, lnc. (tern Cstimalcd Dcsci iptlon, )aid t;nil `l'otat Aiiouj1 Uott Prices Usa,,c _ 1,500 Chlorine Gas m 150 Lb Containers 150 S85.00 (cyl. S 850.00 T BS F03 East 11111 VIell T,B CYL Totui IS Sim An JCI Jones Chemicals, In�� ___ Company Submitting Proposal 'f Authorized Sl(mtim,,, t`Tote. Contractor uzu.st rubrnift a firm proposed for Elie contruet terms}_ �� i g ��`�.��G}}�� f.�Y tlI I € t�I�M the lUidusi- i i, !-1 ned (ieie:,t l,.o,3oses to prof+cle alI e��i11:uLnt, la tor, :n.l+dials and supplies to perform iht' ser•.° , � 5pcc-I icd in this contract f0i tho fothw: nrg Fees- Bidder' Nantle: ICI_Jones_Chemicals,_Inc. Item Lstimated DcscripUou Bid unit Total Anniml U111t p,ircc s 600 Chlorine Gas in I50 Lb Containers 150 'z,'85.00 /cyl. S 340.00 I'BS FOB _"mistrao-S,nings 11`c11 ? I L CL'L. Total $ Janson JCI Jones Chemicals, Inc. Company SUhm:ttu:g P:oposai authorized Signature`' /biJlC: CQLL1rCLC1Q7'fLLLfSt$Y[I771LLf(Z frrLfL prupusnl fQl'IIfL'CQLFIf'(,Ct leYIn(s). i SIC s f C IEA1[C.=I.Y1 SUPPLY 'Old',006 rt.C,,c'0SAL I`011',A� I'lie mulcIaigncd 111 rLby pioposcs to protide ait equipment, labor, maieuaIs and snpplicS to perfonii iho sci ice ::is. Speciflud '71 this C09(IT'Ct toi the lVlil�".5,n� ldCS' l3iddcrl ��,,mr ;e: -JCi_Jones Chemicals Tnc. -- ------------- --- fteili l�;,ti!i1at Dem-ip(Mi7 t3id Unit Total Jnri Pnccs L�saTe 1,500 Chlorinv, Gis In I ;O Lb Con-tamers 1�0 S 85.00 /eyl. S 850.00 f-BS FOB Sei en Oats �Vcll LF CYL. Total 850.Ou JCI Jones Chemicals Inc. Campaii ,r Submirtuig Proposal Authorized Sig uatilrc Note: Corrtt acfar rrcr(st suGrllct a firin/�r olrosul filr Nrc eorrfr act tE'1'r1!(s}. i"ROI'C SAL FORK i The im(Icrsk-ynod hereby proposes to provide all cqu;pment, laher, materials anti snhpl�c0 ;o prrConit!be :,er;-ire ..s specified art this contract for llic followm; fees: j-J-id icr' Notre: JCI Jones Chericals, inc, Bent Fshmated Description Bid Unit Total Annual Unit Pr,ces IJ sage 7 12,000 12 1/2S/o Sodium 1-13'Pochlorite in S 1.75 gal. S 21,000.00 GALS 1,000 Gal Di-liveues BULY GAL. FOB 212th St.Treatment Plant Total $ 21,000.00 JCI Jones Chemicals, Inc. Company Submitun- Proposal Allthoi Ind Signature ,Vote: Contractor must subli it a firrrr proposal for the corrtr•act tei- (s). EXHIBIT B INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR SE .V11C,,E i 0NTRAi TS Insurance The Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement,insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, their agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. A. Minimum Scope of Insurance Contractor shall obtain insurance of the types described below: 1. Automobile Liability insurance covering all owned, non-owned, hired and leased vehicles. Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute forum providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage. 2. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on ISO occurrence Form CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors,products-completed operations,personal injury and advertising injury, and liability assumed under an insured contract. The Commercial General Liability insurance shall be endorsed to provide the Aggregate Per Project Endorsement ISO form CG 25 03 1 1 85. There shall be no endorsement or modification of the Commercial General Liability insurance for liability arising from explosion, collapse or underground property damage. The City shall be named as an insured under the Contractor's Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed for the City using ISO additional insured endorsement CG 20 10 11 85 or a substitute endorsement providing equivalent coverage. 3. Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of the State of Washington. B. Minimum Amounts of Insurance Contractor shall maintain the following insurance limits: 1. Automobile Liability insurance with a minunum combined single limit for bodily injury and properly damage of $1,000,000 per accident. 2. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less Than $1,000,000 each occurrence, $1,000,000 general aggregate and a $1,000,000 products-completed operations aggregate limit �t EXHIBIT B (Continued) C. Dtlier insurance Provrsnaiis The insurance policies are to contain,or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions for Automobile Liability and Coninmercial General Liability insurance: 1. The Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respect the City. Any Insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 2. The Contractor's insurance shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be cancelled by either party, except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. 3. The City of Kent shall be named as an additional insured on all policies (except Professional Liability) as respects work performed by or on behalf of the contractor and a copy of the endorsement naming the City as additional insured shall be attached to the Certificate of Insurance. The City reserves the right to receive a certified copy of all required insurance policies. The Contractor's Commercial General Liability insurance shalt also contain a clause stating that roxieraode sball apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respects to the limits of the insurer's liability. D. Acceptability of Insurers Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not Iess than ANII. E. Verification of Coverage Contractor shall furnish the City with original certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the Contractor before commencement of the work. F. Subcontractors Contractor shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the same insurance requirements as stated herein for the Contractor. Kent City Council Meeting Date December 13 2005 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: LID 352 SEGREGATION RESOLUTION— ADOPT 3 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Resolution No. directing the Finance Director to segregate Assessment No. 2 levied under LID 352. i 1 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director's memorandum 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes No If no: Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund Amount $ 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No 6U PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Larry R. Blanchard, Public Works Director Phone 253-856-5500 K E N T Fax 253-856-6500 WASHINGTON Address 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, WA 98032-5895 DATE: November 17, 2005 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Larry R. Blanchard SUBJECT: Segregation Request for LID 352 MOTION: Recommend that the City Council pass Resolution No directing the Finance Director to segregate Assessment No 2 levied under LID 352. SUMMARY: Sound Venture Seven LLC, prior owner and Heinen Properties, LLC, and Brown Family Trust, the current owners of record of property located in the 800 block of 5`b Ave So., on the east side, has requested segregation due to the property lines being moved through a lot line adjustment. The Public Works Director recommends passage. BUDGET IMPACT: No Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personnel Impact BACKGROUND: LID 352, Assessment #2 was originally assessed for Street Improvements in the amount of$17,330.44. The principal balance as of November 6, 2005 is $12,131.32. Public Works Committee l Segregate Assessment for LID 352 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, directing the Finance Director to segregate an assessment levied under LID #352. RECITALS A. Sound Venture Seven, LLC, the owner of record of the property originally ' affected by LID No. 352, Assessment No. 2, located at 840 51e Avenue S, Kent, WA 98032 has requested segregation. B. All clerical and engineering fees have been paid as required by law, and the application is property in all other respects. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION. — 5eare4ation. The Finance Director is authorized and directed to segregate the assessments as requested by Sound Venture Seven, LLC, as set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and incorporated by this reference. The assessment involved is Assessment No. 2 of Local Improvement District No. 352. 1 ' Sound Venture Seven, LLC LID 352-Assessment, 2 Segregation SECTIONZ—Severabi/ity. If any section,subsection, paragraph, sentence,clause or phrase of this resolution is declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this resolution. SEC7ION3.— Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. SECTION 4. — Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect and be in force immediately upon its passage. ' PASSED at a regular open public meeting by the City Council of the City of Kent, ' Washington, this day of , 2005. CONCURRED in by the Mayor of the City of Kent this _ day 2005. JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY 2 , Sound Venture Seven, LLC LID 352-Assessment, 2 Segregation ' I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, the day of ' 2005. BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK ' P 1CIviRRESOLLMON\UD352-Assess2-SegregatlonAoc t ' 3 Sound Venture Seven, LLC LID 352 Assessment, 2 Segregation KENT 1 WASHINGTON 220 4"'Avenue South 1 Kent, Washington 98032 SEGREGATION APPLICATION 1 1. Legal Description of property to be segregated, together with 1 an attached map of a scale of not less than 1" = 100 ' . i 1 i g segregated ttCl-CA 24 1 2 . Square footage of Area to be se re aced J�C�C c- 3 . Local Improvements District # E,� Q. Assessment # 1 4 . Attached money order, check (no cash) in the amount of $40. 00 1 made payable to the City of Kent. (Minimum Fee) 5. Print clearly the name and address of owner or incoming owner if applicable, of parcel to be segregated. 1 S C ouk rNc( Ve,, U'e Jc s/e� L L • L (If incoming owner, then this � iJ name shall be same as 1 JJr� �•, rl psJ�.h =�GLC�1 undersigned) 6. The undersigned agrees to pay all charges in accordance with 1 the City of Kent Ordinance and RCW 35. 44 . 410 . ( $40. 00/hr. less application fee) 1 /"Applicant IA/, Signature ' Phone Number: �o&L%f-( 9�J , ' New Assessment No. 2-1 NEW DESCRIPTION ' New Assessment Aunt T PTN OF PARCEL 3 OF BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY AUDITOR NUMBERS 8602281539 AND 8602281540, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, ' WASHINGTON, EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 3; THENCE ' NORTH 01' 58'00" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF A DISTANCE OF 174.22 FEET: THENCE NORTH 88' 02'30" EAST, 235.42 FEET TO THE EAST LINE THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 01' 58'00"EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE 174.57 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 88' 07'40"WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF 235 42 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING (AKA) REVISED LOT B PER CITY OF KENT LL- 2005-17, RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR NUMBER 20050706002074, KING ' COUNTY,WASHINGTON (0006600117) ' REMAINDER DESCRIPTION Rem. Assessment No_ 2 PTN OF PARCEL 3 OF BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY AUDITOR NUMBERS 8602281539 AND 8602281540, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 3; THENCE NORTH 01° 58'00" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF A DISTANCE OF 174.22 FEET: THENCE NORTH 88' 02'30" EAST, 235.42 FEET TO THE EAST ' LINE THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 01' 58'00" EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE 174.57 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 88' 07'40"WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF 235.42 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. (AKA) A PORTION OF ' REVISED LOT A PER CITY OF KENT LL- 2005-17, RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR NUMBER 20050706002074, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON (PTN 0006600116) Cn -T ' > 2 3 z N88.02'30"E SP-98-17 67.89 ' 2.1' 7 ZE p ! 1 • o d 1 " , L� NEW sE(;-. Q / r �4' �€ 2-1 _ _ 1 � 1 1 1 it{ f �� �- •� P15�0' ;1JU0 5.0.. . - 0 40 S 160 I 235.42 510'_ 15.0' � � �L ; , L� i SCAL 1"=80' v7 F-- n1 C, t3. � Un 174.22 — a L4 g# I 174.57' Z -- -- - ' N' 3.5 C a C N88'07'40"E EXISTING LOT LINE , I 235.42 1 A � O O 4 Z 1 In o � Q � I io \�1AM G� w v�\` W A SCo C \S88'02'30'W 235.42 LA�� ' ,- EXPIRES 18/07 File. P.\10000s\10541\survey\plats\10541oladwg Dote/Time- 05/23/2005 06:44 Scale. 1=80 Itiddens Xrefs f LID SEGREGATION CERTIFICATE ' KENT w.9 +iHaro• 220 4`h Avenue South 1 Kent,Washington 98032�-_— Attu,Property/Jerry McCaughan Requested by.SOUND VENI URE SEVEN L L C Date LD:)#352 Assess#2 ' Owner&AdcLcss i ORIGINAL DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT NO 2 — sot ND vErT[1Rs s>vEly PARCEL 3 OF BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED LL�C UNDER KING COUNTY AUDITOR NUMBERS 8602281539 AND ' 320 106TH NE#100 RECORDS -- — BELLVIJE,WA 98004 RL'CORDS OF KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON New Assessment No. 2-1 ' Owner&Address NEW DESCRIPTION — _ New Assessment Amt.: 16,065.66 , c PTN OF PARCEL 3 OF BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT Attn Gary Hemen RECORDFD UNDER KING COUNTY AUDITOR NUMBERS ' 84054 Avenue South 8602281539 AND 8602281540,RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, Kun4%98032 WASHINGTON;EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF,MORE I11 PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.BEGINNING AT THE 4'r s SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 3;THENCE NORTH ' 01' 58'00"WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF A DISTANCE OF 174.22 FEET THENCE NORTH 88'02'30"EAST,235 42 FEET' TO'TIIE EAST LINE THEREOF,TI IENCE SOUTH 01`58'00"EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE 174 57 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF,THENCE SOUTH 88-07'40"WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF 235 42 FEET TO"THE POINT OF BEGINNING (AKA)REVISED LO"1 B PER CITY OF KENT LL- 2(X)5-17,RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR NUMBER 20050706002074,KING COUNTY,WASIUNGTON (0006600117) ' -Owner-&Address REMAINDER DESCRIPTION Rem.Assessment No.26 0 Assessment Aml $ 65 66 BrownFamityTrust PTN OF PARCEI.3 OF BOUNDARY LINE.ADJUSTMENT Atht Conroe Brown RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY AUDITOR NUMBERS ' Tanglewood Island, 8602281539 AND 8602281540,RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, Wa. 98333 WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 3;'1'HLNCE NORTH Ot'53'00"WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE THERF,OF A DISTANCE i OF 174 22 FEET THENCE NORTH 88°02'30"EAST,235 42 FLET TO THE EAST LINE THEREOF,THENCE SOUTH Ol-58'00"EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE 174 57 FEET TO THE SOUT'I BAST CORNER THERF,OF,THENCE SOUTH 88-07'40"WEST A LONG TIIE SOUTH LINE THEREOF 235 42 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING (AKA)A POR I ION OF REVISED LOT A PER CITY OF KFNT 1.L-2005-17,RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR NUMBLR 20050700002074,KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON PTN 0006600116) 1 ---- The undetstgned hereby accepts above terms andcondttions and 1 hr at$40 00 certifies to the correctness hergm y per hotu S40.00 _ — Receipt No. SIGNRD 0074744 Autho�tzed Signature for y,-Itre tt�'��� ,):-v;% 't"� (0911612005) f sIGNEn Authorized Signature for Brown Family Trust Due -0- ' Approved by Resolution It _ { 1 t Kent City Council Meeting Date_ December 13 2005 Categoy Consent Calendar ' 1. SUBJECT: HOMELAND SECURITY O'BRIEN WELL SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACT—AUTHORIZE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization for the Mayor to sign the Washington State Homeland Security Grant for the O'Brien Well Security Improvements in the amount of$11,205, and to direct staff to accept the grant and establish for the funds to be spent on this project. ' 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director's memorandum ' 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure" N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes No If no: Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue Fund Amount $ ' 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6V 1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Larry R Blanchard, Public Works Director '. • Phone 253-855 5500 Fax 253-856-6500 K E N T 1 W A 5 H 1 N G T o N Address 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent,WA 98032-5895 DATE: November 28, 2005 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Brad Lake, Water Superintendent iTHROUGH: Larry Blanchard. Public Works Director SUBJECT: Washington State Homeland Security Grant Acceptance Authorization iFor O'Brien Well Security Improvements Motion: Recommend authorization for the Mayor to sign the Washington State Homeland Security Grand for the O'Brien Well Security Improvements in the sum of$11,205, direct staff ' to accept the grant and establish for the funds to be spent with said project. SUMMARY: This grant agreement, in the amount of$11,205 is for needed security improvements to the telemetry system at O'Brien We11. In order for the City to be reimbursed for these expenses,the City must accept the grant and use Water funds for the initial cost of these umprovements. Grant funds will then reimburse the City up to the approved total. The Public Works Department ' recommends that the City Council accept the grant funds. BUDGET IMPACT: No Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personnel Impact BACKGROUND: The King County Office of Emergency Management administers these federal funds for security grants and has authorized the use of these funds for the security improvements to the telemetry system at O'Brien Well. These improvements are expected to cost less than the total of the grant and are therefore fully reimbursable. This project will help to protect a part of the City's critical infrastructure and the potable water supply of the citizens of Kent i Page I of I ' OBW Council request.doe Print Date- 11/30/2005 Fiscal Year 2004 State Homeland Security Program Grant - '04 Equipment Budget Detail Worksheet State: Washington Date: 3/3112005 Equipment Purchase Total Cost: $11,205 Jurisdiction: King County -- (FFY04-SHSP-010) Equipment Item Qty Total Cost Discipline ' Category Interoperable Miscellaneous Hardware(PLC): 1 $821 00 PW Public Works Communications MOUNTING RAIL 19 IN CABINETS 1 TERMINAL BLOCK 20 PIN 8116PT ' 1201240 VOLT 20A CIRCUIT BREAKER OTHER MISCELLANEOUS Miscellaneous Hardware (Radio): 1 $190 15 PW Public Works PIPE AND HARDWARE FOR MOUNTING (1) MAST,COAXIAL CABLES AND FITTINGS, CONNECTORS Physical Security (Alarm Systems)Control Panel with Enhancement Programmable Logic Controller ' (Siemens part#'s except for enclosure PW Public Works ' CPU 314,MPI,48KB 1 $705 00 1 PW Public Works MICRO MEMORY CARD F/S7-300, 128KB 1 $109 00 1 PW Public Works PS307 1151230VAC PIS 24VDC 5A 1 $208 00 1 PW Public Works INPUT MOD 16PTS,120/230 VAC 1 $240 00 1 PW Public Works OUTPUT MOD 16PTS,120/230 VAC 1 $391 00 1 PW Public Works CP340-lA RS23213964RIASCI1 1 $470 00 1 PW Public Works TOUCH PANEL TP170A MONO 1 $695 00 1 STALIN 36x30 NEMA 4X ENCL/WINDOW KIT,BACK PANEL,AND ROTARY HANDLE 1 $648 00 (Alarm Systems) PLC and PW Public Works Communication Programming 1 $1,800 00 1 1 DATARADIOICOR INTEGRA MODEL PW Public Works RADIO/MODEM UHF, 12.5 KHZ,4800 OR (1) 9600 BAUD,SELECTABLE DATA RATES 1 $1,175 00 ' POLYPHASOR LIGHTNING ARRESTOR PW Public Works 1 $74.75 1 YAGI ANTENNA,9 dBd GAIN PW Public Works ' 1 $86 70 1 Physical Security (Alarm Systems)Door contacts Enhancement (CutlerHammer E50AR1 Switch and PW Public Works E50KL201 Operator) 2 $260 00 (2) Other Authorized (Installation costs for authorized equipment purchased through ODP grants) Radio installation, PW Public Works programming 1 $660,00 (1) (Installation costs for authorized ' equipment purchased through ODP grants) Budd PLC Panel with PW Public Works UL label 1 $1,900 00 (1) , Sales tax onequipment) PLC $550 64 Sales tax onequipment) Radio $197 62 (Sales tax on equipment) Door $23 14 Contacts Total Jurisdictional Request: $11,205 00 Shipping Costs $0 00 Sales Tax.1 see at .r Grand Total $11,205 00 iFFY04-SHSP-010 iKing County Office of Emergency Management ism _ HOMELAND SECURITY SUBGRANT AGREEM J_,T T , PROJECT TITLE: O'Brien Well Communication and Security Improvements i THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between King County and the City of Kent, hereinafter "Subgrantee", for the express purposes set forth in the following provisions of this Agreement. iIt is understood that funding for this Agreement has been granted to King County by the United States Department of Homeland Security through the Washington State Military Department, i Emergency Management Division The funding source of the grant is the FFY2004 State Homeland Security Program, Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) #97.004, State Contract#E05--069. 1 NOW THEREFORE, King County and the Subgrantee mutually agree as follows: i 1. SCOPE OF WORK AND BUDGET The Subgrantee will accomplish the work and tasks as set forth in this Agreement and the Scope of Work, Protect Timeline, and Deliverables (attached hereto as Exhibit A) and Budget (Exhibit B). 2. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE Subject to other Agreement provisions, the period of performance under this Agreement will be from July 26, 2004 to October 1, 2005. All work must be satisfactorily completed, and all invoices, reports, and deliverables must be submitted, by the end of this Period of Performance. 3. CONTRACT REPRESENTATIVES iKing County's Protect Manager on this Agreement shall be Kathryn Howard, Program Manager, King County Office of Emergency Management. The Protect Manager shall be responsible for monitoring the performance of the Subgrantee, the approval of actions by the Subgrantee, approval for payment of billings and expenses submitted by the Subgrantee, and the acceptance of any reports by the Subgrantee iThe Subgrantee's representative to this Agreement shall bey/20TRWOT who will be the contact person for all communications regarding the conduct of work under this Agreement and who will ensure that all terms of the Agreement are met. Any notice required or permitted under this Agreement shall be deemed sufficiently given or ' served if sent to King County or the Subgrantee at the addresses provided on the next page. i 1 FFY04-SHSP-010 If to King County: ' Kathryn Howard King County Office of Emergency Management 3511 NE 2 d Street Renton, WA 98056 206-296-3830 , kathryn.howard@metrokc gov If to the Subgrantee: 5rad,Lakwi Water,Superinte td t City,,,-of,-Kent Public_Works-Qperations;Water,Sectir € AttnY=fublicWorks Operations 220_4'"Avenue S Kent;:--WA 98032 t 253-856-5610 bhaXe0gi,kent.waeps 4. REIMBURSEMENT REQUESTS AND PAYMENT This is a fixed price, reimbursement contract. Total compensation payable to the Subgrantee for satisfactory performance of the work under this Agreement shall not exceed $11,205.00 (Eleven thousand two hundred five dollars and zero cents). Payment for satisfactory performance of the work shall not exceed this amount unless the parties mutually agree in writing to a higher amount prior to the commencement of any work, which will cause the maximum payment to be exceeded. Compensation for satisfactory work performance shall be payable upon receipt of a properly completed Invoice and Progress Report Form, which will be provided to the Subgrantee subsequent to execution of this Agreement. Invoices for costs incurred to date may be submitted monthly or quarterly. Supporting documentation is required for reimbursement of all expenses related to the Scope of Work and Budget in Exhibits A and B. Supporting documentation includes, but is not limited to, paid invoices to vendors, paid expense claim forms, canceled checks, etc The documentation must also include the date of payment by the Subgrantee to ensure that the work was completed within the subgrant period of performance. Payment shall be considered timely if mailed by King County to the Subgrantee within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of properly completed invoices. Payment shall be sent to the address designated by the Subgrantee on the invoice form. King County may, at its sole discretion, withhold payments claimed by the Subgrantee for services rendered if King County has determined that the Subgrantee has failed to satisfactorily comply with any term or condition of this Agreement. King County does not incur liability for any payment to the Subgrantee that is subsequently , disallowed by State or Federal granting agencies. King County reserves the right to withhold or recoup payment, for work or activities determined by funding agencies to be ineligible for reimbursement. 2 tFFY04-SHSP-010 ' 5. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Each request for re►rnbursement, whether-submitted monthly ,or.quarterly, will-be accompanied by a narrative progress report. Reports must include the Subgrantee's progress in implementing the scope of work, including any problems encountered and possible cost overruns or underruns. Narrative progress reports may be filled out on the Invoice and Progress Report Form or as a separate attachment to the invoice form. 1 6. RECORDS MAINTENANCE The Subgrantee shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel, financial, and programmatic records, and other such records as may be deemed necessary by King County, to ensure proper accounting for all project funds and compliance with this Agreement. All such ' records shall sufficiently and properly reflect all direct and indirect costs of any nature expended and seance provided in the performance of this Agreement. These records shall be maintained for a period of six (6) years after subgrant close-out, and shall be subject to inspection, review or audit by King County and/or by State or Federal officials as so authorized by law t7. SINGLE AUDIT ACT REQUIREMENTS ' Non-federal entities receiving financial assistance of $500,000 or more in Federal funds from all sources, direct and indirect, are required to have a single or a program-specific audit conducted in accordance with the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) (Revised June 27, 2003) 1 Circular A-133-Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. Non- federal entities that spend less than $500,000 a year in Federal awards are exempt from Federal audit requirements for that year, except as noted in Circular No. A-133. ■ Entities required to have an audit must ensure the audit is performed in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GARS), Government Auditing Standards (the Revised Yellow Book) developed by the Comptroller General and the OMB Compliance Supplement. The Subgrantee has the responsibility of notifying the State Auditor's Office and requesting an audit, if required. The Subgrantee shall maintain its records and accounts so as to facilitate the audit requirement and shall ensure that any subrecipients or subcontractors also maintain auditable records. The Subgrantee must send a letter stating there has been a single audit completed and there were no findings or if there were findings, the letter should provide a list of the findings. In addition to sending a copy of the audit, the Subgrantee must include a corrective action plan for any audit findings and a copy of the management letter if one was received The Subgrantee must send this letter to King County no later than nine (9) months after the end ' of the Subgrantee's fiscal year(s). 3 FFY04-SHSP-010 8. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS , The Subgrantee shall be responsible for following all applicable Federal, State and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations in the performance of work described herein. The Subgrantee assures that its procedures are consistent with laws relating to public contracting and competitive selection procedures. The SUBGRANTEE shall comply with OMB Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments; OMB A-102, Grants and Cooperative Agreements with State and Local Governments; and A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. During the performance of this Agreement, neither the Subgrantee nor any party subcontracting under the authority of this Agreement shall discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, nationality, creed, marital status, sexual orientation, age, or presence of any sensory, mental, or physical handicap in the employment or application for employment or in the administration or delivery of or access to services or any other benefits under this Agreement as defined by King County Code, Chapter 12 16. During the performance of this Agreement, neither the Subgrantee nor any party subcontracting under the authority of this Agreement shall engage in unfair employment practices as defined by King County Code, Chapter 12.17 or 12.18. The Subgrantee shall comply fully with all applicable Federal, State and local laws, ordinances, executive orders and regulations that prohibit such discrimination. These laws include, but are not limited to, RCW Chapter 49.60 and Titles VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 9. AMENDMENTS This Agreement may be amended only by written concurrence of both parties. Amendments to j Scope of Work will only be approved if the proposed amendment is consistent with State and Federal granting agency rules Up to ten percent (10%) of the total award amount may be , shifted between approved budget object codes as contained in Exhibit B. For amounts over ten percent (10%), the SUBGRANTEE must submit a written budget amendment request for approval. Such requests will only be approved if the proposed change(s) is (are) consistent with and/or achieves the goals stated in the Scope of Work and falls within the grant requirements. 10. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by King County, in whole or in part, for convenience without cause prior to the end of the Period of Performance, upon thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice. This Agreement may be terminated by either party, in whole or in part, for cause prior to the end of the Period of Performance, upon thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice. Reasons ' for termination for cause may include but not be limited to: material issues of nonperformance, misuse of funds, and/or failure to provide grant-related invoices, reports, or any requested documentation ' If the Agreement is terminated as provided above, King County will be liable only for payment in accordance with the terms of this Agreement for satisfactory work completed prior to the 4 FFY04-SHSP-010 ' effective date of termination. The Subgrantee shall be released from any obligation to provide further services pursuant to this Agreement. Nothing herein shall limit, waive, or extinguish any right or remedy provided by this Agreement I or law that either party may have in the event that the obligations, terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement are breached by the other party. Funding under this Contract beyond the current appropriation year is conditional upon appropriation by the County Council of sufficient funds to support the activities described in this Contract. Should such an appropriation not be approved, this contract will terminate at the close of the current appropriation year. 11. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION The Subgrantee shall protect, indemnify and hold harmless King County, its officers, officials, ' agents, and employees from and against any and all claims, costs, and/or issues whatsoever occurring from any and all actions by the Subgrantee and/or its subcontractors pursuant to this Agreement. The Subgrantee shall defend at its own expense any and all claims, demands, 1 suits, penalties, losses, damages, or costs of any kind whatsoever (hereinafter "claims") brought against King County arising out of or incident to the Subgrantee's execution of, performance of or failure to perform this Agreement. Claims shall include but not be limited to assertions that the use or transfer of any software, book, document, report, film, tape, or sound reproduction or material of any kind, delivered hereunder, constitutes an infringement of any copyright, patent, trademark, trade name, and/or otherwise results in unfair trade practice. In the event the County incurs attorney fees and/or costs in the defense of claims within the scope of the paragraph above, such attorney fees and costs shall be recoverable from the Subgrantee. In addition King County shall be entitled to recover from the Subgrantee its attorney fees, and costs incurred to enforce the provisions of this section. 12. INSURANCE Subgrantee shall provide and maintain and shall cause its subcontractors to provide and maintain Commercial General Liability in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence and $ 2,000,000 in the aggregate. King County, its officers, officials, agents and employees shall be named as additional insureds. If the Agency is a Municipal Corporation or an agency of the State of Washington and is self- insured for any of the above insurance requirements, a certification of self-insurance shall be attached hereto and be incorporated by reference and shall constitute compliance with this section. t 5 FFY04-SHSP-010 13. CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT SUSPENSION OR INELIGIBILITY , If Federal funds are the basis for this contract, the Subgrantee certifies that-neither it-nor its ' principals are presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in transactions by any Federal department or agency. 14. ENTIRE CONTRACT/WAIVER OF DEFAULT This Agreement is the complete expression of the agreement of King County and the Subgrantee hereto, and any oral or written representations or understandings not incorporated herein are excluded. Waiver of any default shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent default Waiver of breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be waiver of any other or subsequent breach and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of this Agreement unless stated to be such through written approval by King County, which shall be attached to the original Agreement. 15. SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Agreement is, for any reason, found to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Agreement. 16. APPROVAL , This Agreement shall be subject to the written approval of the King County's authorized representative and shall not be binding until so approved. 6 FFY04-SHSP-010 ' THIS AGREEMENT, consisting of 7 pages and 2 attachments, is executed by the persons signing below who warrant and represent that they have the authority to execute the Agreement. tIN WITNESS WHEREOF this Agreement has been executed by each party on the date set forth below. City of Kent King_Co. Office of Emergency Management BY ' Name & Title County Administrative Officer Date Date 1 . 7 FFY04-SHSP-010 ' EXHIBIT A: SCOPE OF WORK and PROJECT TIMELINE- FFY04 SHSP Project Name O'Brien Well Communication and Security Improvements Project Contact Person, Title & Phone#: Brad Lake,Water Superintendent, 253 856 5600 Identify Direct Link to "FFY04 State Homeland Security Program—C. Authorized Program Expenditures": Section C,Authorized Program Expenditures, Allowable Equipment Costs, Page 23, #7 Alarm Systems Choose one Primary Goal and Objective from the"Washington State Homeland Security Strategy"that relates directly to the Project: Goal 4, Objective 1.4—(3 1 2 Develop countermeasures and acquire necessary resources to protect critical infrastructures. (4.1.4)) SCOPE OF WORK— NARRATIVE (Limit two pages) Project Description (Well-defined purpose; breakdown of activities into clear, concise actions; and measurable deliverables, results and end products ): In December of 2003 the City of Kent Public Works Water Department completed its Vulnerability Assessment (VA) in accordance with the requirements of the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness Act of 2002 In the VA Final Report, Priority 1 recommendations focus on access to those facilities, particularly deterring, detecting, and delaying access into those areas of greatest sensitivity such as Control and Well buildings Currently, the City's infrastructure facilities are protected by chain-link perimeter fencing and entry alarm switches tied to telemetry/SCADA systems for immediate intrusion detection and notification There is however, one exception to this rule_ One of the City's wells was developed during the 2001 drought for seasonal use. Due to budget and time constraints it was built on a minimal budget and does not have many of the features of other City infrastructure. , Due to the prohibitive cost, until recently the site had not even received utility power and was powered by generator as needed Currently, though 24-hour utility power is now on site there is still no communication between this site and the City telemetry/SCADA system. This leaves the City Public Works control system "blind" to this site except for periodic visits by Water Department employees Though it is not a major water source, the building and appurtenances provide a direct, yet hidden access into the city water system Except for those periodic site visits, there is no ability at this site to detect or respond to attack. The Water System VA recommends hardening of this infrastructure through the installation of quality deadbolts and entry alarms The best use of these entry alarms would be to connect this site to the telemetry/SCADA system for immediate detection and response to forced entry into the well house/control building and possible attempts to contaminate the City of Kent water supply from there While the City would like to implement these recommendations, there is currently little or no funding available for hardening these facilities to the levels recommended in this assessment If provided with funding, the City would install all the necessary hardware and software to harden this site and communicate with it on a 24-hr basis This site would then communicate with the City's SCADA system and immediately notify operators of any alarms This would provide detection and response capabilities which currently DO NOT exist It would also work continuously to prohibit or delay entry and deter many kinds of threats from the date of installation with little or no long-term maintenance costs over and above the Facilities department routine maintenance budget On the uniform risk scale ranging from 0 (lowest risk)to 1 (highest risk)this improvement reduces the original risk level from 0.45 to 0 05 with a high rating in the mitigation area of"effectiveness to prevent/mitigate adversary success" These improvements would reduce or eliminate the ability of adversaries to stage a prolonged attack on the Kent water system from this site The result of this protect would be greater protection of the City of Kent's ' water supply and a great reduction of the risk of adversarial attack currently faced at this location The City of Kent supplies water to over 50,000 residents of King County and is the major warehouse and transportation hub for the South end of the County as well In addition to the potable water supply for residential and business use, the City of Kent Fire and Life Safety department is dependent on the Kent water supply for adequate water to provide fire protection for these residents and businesses In case of fire or malicious attack at any of Kent's warehouses or many hazardous material facilities, this supply is critical to the safety of these many 8 IFFY04-SHSP-010 citizens. In addition, through the use of 2-way milerbes, the City of Kent can supply water as needed to each of the Cities and Water Districts around it including, King County Water District#111, Covington Water, Highline Water District, and the Cities of Auburn, Renton, and Tukwila. The hardening of this part of this critical infrastrucblee through increased security and system communtcatioIn- `- protects both the health and safety of many of the residents of South King County as well as providing fire protection for the 3`d largest warehouse distribution center in the United States and a back-up water supply to surrounding Cities and Water Districts The addition of entry alarms and communication with this station significantly reduces the risk of damage or destruction to this municipal water supply with little or no additional future maintenance costs. 9 FFY04-SHSP-010 PROJECT TIMELINE (Include measurable activities for task completion and critical dates. Projects must be completed and delivered prior to October 1, 2005. Activity Estimated Completion Date Outline precise plans and create specifications 10/31/04 Complete process and award contract 12/31/05 Receive equipment installed on site 3131/05 Inspect and approve equipment, connect to SCADA system 4/30/05 Final billing and payment processed,lob completed. 6/30/05 j t t E t I 1 t 1 10 FFY04-SHSP-010 EXHIBIT B: BUDGET ATTACH ONE BUDGET SHEET PER CATEGORY -w—This is a reimbursement grant PASS THROUGH BUDGET-FFY04 SHSP Identifyget Category (Planning, Training, Exercise, or Equipmentj-,Equlpment ITEM DESCRIPTION COST SALARIES & BENEFITS (Not for payment of overtime) OVERTIMElBACKFILL EQUIPMENT (see Excel spreadsheet for detailed listing) $11,205.00 TRAVEL AND PER DIEM GOODS AND SERVICES (Please Specify) CONSULTANT FEES OTHER COSTS (Please specify.) TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED PROJECT COST OR AWARD $11,205.00 AMOUNT 10%of total award amount maybe shifted between approved budget object codes • Final signed invoice voucher to be submitted with final performance report& deliverables-Invoices not to exceed total amount of contract award 11 FFY04-SHSP-010 1 See attachment-OBW Equip sheet FFY04 SHSP.xls 12 t Kent City Council Meeting -- iv Date__ ecember 13.2005 category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: HOMELAND SECURITY KENT SPRINGS SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACT —AUTHORIZE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization for the Mayor to sign the Washington State Homeland Security Grant for the Kent Springs Security Improvements in the amount of$13,200, and to direct staff to accept the grant and establish for the funds to be spent on this project. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director's memorandum 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure9 N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes No If no: Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund Amount $ 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No 6W PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Larry R. Blanchard, Public Works Director Phone.253-856-5500 KE O T Fax 253-856-6500 W A S H I N G T O N Address 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent,WA.98032-5895 DATE: November 28, 2005 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Brad Lake, Water Superintendent THROUGH: Larry Blanchard, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Washington State Homeland Security Grant Acceptance Authorization For Kent Springs Security Improvements Motion: Recommend authorization for the Mayor to sign the Washington State Homeland Security Grand for the Kent Sprigs Security Improvements in the amount of$13,2000, direct staff to accept the grant and establish for the funds to be spent with said project. SUMMARY: This grant agreement, in the amount of$13,200 is for security improvements, which consist of additional fencing for our water supply sources at Kent Springs. In order for the City to be reimbursed for these expenses, the City must accept the grant and use Water funds for the cost of these improvements. Grant funds will then reimburse the City up to the approved total. If project cost exceeds the amount currently grant funded and excess funds become available, the City may request additional funding. The Public Works Department reconmmmends that the City Council accept the grant funds. BUDGET IMPACT: No Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personnel Impact BACKGROUND: The King County Office of Emergency Management administers these federal funds for security rants and has authorized the use of these fiends for the security fencing improvements at Kent Springs. This project will provide additional fencing which will help to protect a part of the City's critical infrastructure and the potable water supply of the cittzens of Kent Page 1 of 1 KS Council request.doc Print Date 1 1/30/2005 Fiscal Year 2004 State Homeland Security Program Grant - '04 Equipment Budget Detail Worksheet State: Washinqton L Date: 12/1/2004 Equipment Purchase Total Cost: $13,200 Jurisdiction: King County -- (FFY04-SHSP-009) Equipment Item Qty Total Cost Discipline Category Physical Security Barriers Fences,Jersey Walls —1400 lineal feet $13,200 00 PW Public Works Enhancement Chain Link Security Fencing and (--1400 lineal feet or Gates (7'0" high, plus 1'0", 3 strands 100%) barb wire, 2" mesh 9 gauge fabric with 7 gauge coil spring wire at top) Objective 1 4—(3.1 2 Develop countermeasures and acquire necessary resources to protect critical Infrastructures (4.1 4))This fencing hardens specific critical Infrastructure as recommended in our Vulnerablility Assessment to protect water source, pump control and well structures(see below) Rated "High" in the detection and delay areas of "effectiveness to prevent/mitigate adversary success" Total Jurisdictional Request: $13,200 00 Shipping Costs. $0 00 Sales Tax: $0 00 Grand Total- $13,200 00 The City of Kent's Kent Springs Watershed is an area of approximately 160 somewhat wooded acres surrounded by a single 7' high plus 1' 3-strand barb wire perimeter fence Inside this area is the infiltration gallery where the water enters the system, one surge tank, one pump control building, two well vaults, one well building, and a chemical feed building Currently, only the chemical feed building has additional inside perimeter fencing Sight lines to these structures from the outside perimeter are obscured or completely blocked by trees In our Vulnerability Assessment, Priority 1 recommendations for Kent Springs include-"Add security fence around control building and surge tank" and "Add security fence around well 3 building" On the uniform risk scale ranging from 0 (lowest risk) to 1 (highest risk)these improvements reduce the original risk level from 0.81 down to an updated risk of 0 45 Since the surge tank, pump control building, and Well#1 vault are adjacent to each other, they would be in one fenced area, while the infiltration gallery, the Well#2 vault, and Well #3 building would be fenced in individually These additional 7'high plus 1' 3-strand barb wire perimeter fences would surround each of these facilities and be no closer than 6' and no further than 40' (worst case at Well#3 due to driveway)from the structures, providing additional security, deterrence, and delay once an intruder had gained access to the inside of the overall watershed perimeter. FFY04-SHSP-009 King County Office of Emergency Management i HOMELAND SE—CURITYYSUBGRANT AGREEMENT PROJECT TITLE: Kent Springs Infiltration Gallery Security Improvements THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between King County and the City of Kent, hereinafter "Subgrantee", for the express purposes set forth in the following provisions of this Agreement. It is understood that funding for this Agreement has been granted to King County by the United i States Department of Homeland Security through the Washington State Military Department, Emergency Management Division. The funding source of the grant is the FFY2004 State Homeland Security Program, Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) #97.004, State Contract #EO5--069. NOW THEREFORE, King County and the Subgrantee mutually agree as follows• 1. SCOPE OF WORK AND BUDGET The Subgrantee will accomplish the work and tasks as set forth in this Agreement and the Scope of Work, Project Timeline, and Deliverables (attached hereto as Exhibit A) and Budget (Exhibit B) 2. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE Subject to other Agreement provisions, the period of performance under this Agreement will be from July 26, 2004 to October 1, 2005 All work must be satisfactorily completed, and all invoices, reports, and deliverables must be submitted, by the end of this Period of Performance. 3. CONTRACT REPRESENTATIVES King County's Project Manager on this Agreement shall be Kathryn Howard, Program Manager King County Office of Emergency Management. The Project Manager shall be responsible for monitoring the performance of the Subgrantee, the approval of actions by the Subgrantee, approval for payment of billings and expenses submitted by the Subgrantee, and the acceptance of any reports by the Subgrantee. The Subgrantee's representative to this Agreement shall be rad LW�Wifer pe"n AR6 eltt, who will be the contact person for all communications regarding the conduct of work under this Agreement and who will ensure that all terms of the Agreement are met. Any notice required or permitted under this Agreement shall be deemed sufficiently given or served if sent to King County or the Subgrantee at the addresses provided on the next page t FFY04-SHSP-009 If to King County: Kathryn Howard King County Office of Emergency Management--�--.ti - - ' 3511 NE 2nd Street Renton, WA 98056 206-296-3830 kathryn.howard@metrokc.gov If to the Subgrantee: Bfad,Lakw Waterr-Sctperintezrdent City,Qf Kent,Paublic�WorkslOperabonsm,,, aterSectio Attn: Public;-Works Operation,5 220.4`h,Avenue S Kent,,WA_98032 253-856-5610 _ t�lake@ci.kQnt v!ra;,t� 4. REIMBURSEMENT REQUESTS AND PAYMENT This is a fixed price, reimbursement contract. Total compensation payable to the Subgrantee for satisfactory performance of the work under this Agreement shall not exceed $13,20000 (Thirteen thousand two hundred dollars and zero cents). Payment for satisfactory performance of the work shall not exceed this amount unless the parties mutually agree in writing to a higher amount prior to the commencement of any work, which will cause the maximum payment to be exceeded. Compensation for satisfactory work performance shall be payable upon receipt of a properly completed Invoice and Progress Report Form, which will be provided to the Subgrantee subsequent to execution of this Agreement. Invoices for costs incurred to date may be submitted monthly or quarterly. Supporting documentation is required for reimbursement of all expenses related to the Scope of Work and Budget in Exhibits A and B Supporting documentation includes, but is not limited to, paid invoices to vendors, paid expense claim forms, canceled checks, etc The documentation must also include the date of payment by the Subgrantee to ensure that the work was completed within the subgrant period of performance. Payment shall be considered timely if mailed by King County to the Subgrantee within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of properly completed invoices Payment shall be sent to the address designated by the Subgrantee on the invoice form. King County may, at its sole discretion, withhold payments claimed by the Subgrantee for services rendered if King County has determined that the Subgrantee has failed to satisfactorily comply with any term or condition of this Agreement King County does not incur liability for any payment to the Subgrantee that is subsequently disallowed by State or Federal granting agencies. King County reserves the right to withhold or recoup payment, for work or activities determined by funding agencies to be ineligible for reimbursement 2 FFY04-SHSP-009 5. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Each request for reimbursement, whether submitted monthly or gquarierly;will be accompanied by a narrative progress report. Reports must include the Subgrantee's progress in implementing the scope of work, including any problems encountered and possible cost overruns or underruns. Narrative progress-reports may be filled out on the Invoice and Progress Report Form or as a separate attachment to the invoice form. 6. RECORDS MAINTENANCE The Subgrantee shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel, financial, and programmatic records, and other such records as may be deemed necessary by King County, to ensure proper accounting for all project funds and compliance with this Agreement All such records shall sufficiently and properly reflect all direct and indirect costs of any nature expended and service provided in the performance of this Agreement. These records shall be maintained for a period of six (6) years after subgrant close-out, and shall be subject to inspection, review or audit by King County and/or by State or Federal officials as so authorized by law. 7. SINGLE AUDIT ACT REQUIREMENTS Non-federal entities receiving financial assistance of $500,000 or more in Federal funds from all sources, direct and indirect, are required to have a single or a program-specific audit conducted in accordance with the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) (Revised June 27, 2003) Circular A-133-Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. Non- federal entities that spend less than $500,000 a year in Federal awards are exempt from Federal audit requirements for that year, except as noted in Circular No. A-133. Entities required to have an audit must ensure the audit is performed in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS), Government Auditing Standards (the Revised Yellow Book) developed by the Comptroller General and the OMB Compliance Supplement. The Subgrantee has the responsibility of notifying the State Auditor's Office and requesting an j audit, if required. The Subgrantee shall maintain its records and accounts so as to facilitate the audit requirement and shall ensure that any subreapients or subcontractors also maintain auditable records. The Subgrantee must send a letter stating there has been a single audit completed and there were no findings or if there were findings, the letter should provide a list of the findings. In addition to sending a copy of the audit, the Subgrantee must include a corrective action plan for any audit findings and a copy of the management letter if one was received. The Subgrantee must send this letter to King County no later than nine (9) months after the end of the Subgrantee's fiscal year(s). 3 I FFY04-SHSP-009 8. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS The Subgrantee shall be responsible for following all applicable Federal, State and local laws, ordinances, _rules and regulations in the performance of work described herein. The ' Subgrantee-assures that its p`roce uses 'are-consistent with laws relating to public contracting= and competitive selection procedures. The SUBGRANTEE shall comply with OMB Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments; OMB A-102, Grants and Cooperative Agreements with State and Local Governments; and A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. During the performance of this Agreement, neither the Subgrantee nor any party subcontracting under the authority of this Agreement shall discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, nationality, creed, marital status, sexual orientation, age, or presence of any sensory, mental, or physical handicap in the employment or application for employment or in the administration or i delivery of or access to services or any other benefits under this Agreement as defined by King j County Code, Chapter 12.16. During the performance of this Agreement, neither the Subgrantee nor any party subcontracting under the authority of this Agreement shall engage in unfair employment practices as defined by King County Code, Chapter 12.17 or 12.18. The Subgrantee shall comply fully with all applicable Federal, State and local laws, ordinances, executive orders and regulations that prohibit such discrimination. These laws include, but are not limited to, RCW Chapter 49 60 and Titles VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 9. AMENDMENTS This Agreement may be amended only by written concurrence of both parties. Amendments to Scope of Work will only be approved if the proposed amendment is consistent with State and Federal granting agency rules. Up to ten percent (10%) of the total award amount may be shifted between approved budget object codes as contained in Exhibit B For amounts over ten percent (10%), the SUBGRANTEE must submit a written budget amendment request for approval. Such requests will only be approved if the proposed change(s) is (are) consistent with and/or achieves the goals stated in the Scope of Work and falls within the grant requirements. 10. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by King County, in whole or in part, for convenience without ' cause prior to the end of the Period of Performance, upon thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice This Agreement may be terminated by either party, in whole or in part, for cause prior to the end of the Period of Performance, upon thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice Reasons for termination for cause may include but not be limited to. material issues of nonperformance, misuse of funds, and/or failure to provide grant-related invoices, reports, or any requested documentation. If the Agreement is terminated as provided above, King County will be liable only for payment in accordance with the terms of this Agreement for satisfactory work completed prior to the 4 FFY04-SHSP-009 1 effective date of termination. The Subgrantee shall be released from any obligation to provide further services pursuant to this Agreement. Nothing herein shall limit, waive, or extinguish any right or remedy provided by this Agreement or law that either party may have in the event that the obligations, terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement are breached by the other party. Funding under this Contract beyond the current appropriation year is conditional upon appropriation by the County Council of sufficient funds to support the activities described in this Contract Should such an appropriation not be approved, this contract will terminate at the close of the current appropriation year 11. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION The Subgrantee shall protect, indemnify and hold harmless King County, its officers, officials, agents, and employees from and against any and all claims, costs, and/or issues whatsoever occurring from any and all actions by the Subgrantee and/or its subcontractors pursuant to this Agreement. The Subgrantee shall defend at its own expense any and all claims, demands, suits, penalties, losses, damages, or costs of any kind whatsoever (hereinafter "claims") brought against King County arising out of or incident to the Subgrantee's execution of, performance of or failure to perform this Agreement Claims shall include but not be limited to assertions that the use or transfer of any software, book, document, report, film, tape, or sound reproduction or material of any kind, delivered hereunder, constitutes an infringement of any copyright, patent, trademark, trade name, and/or otherwise results in unfair trade practice In the event the County incurs attorney fees and/or costs in the defense of claims within the scope of the paragraph above, such attorney fees and costs shall be recoverable from the Subgrantee In addition King County shall be entitled to recover from the Subgrantee its attorney fees, and costs incurred to enforce the provisions of this section. 12. INSURANCE Subgrantee shall provide and maintain and shall cause its subcontractors to provide and maintain Commercial General Liability in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence and $ 2,000,000 in the aggregate. King County, its officers, officials, agents and employees ■ shall be named as additional insureds. j If the Agency is a Municipal Corporation or an agency of the State of Washington and is self- insured for any of the above insurance requirements, a certification of self-insurance shall be attached hereto and be incorporated by reference and shall constitute compliance with this section. , 5 FFY04-SHSP-009 13. CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT SUSPENSION OR INELIGIBILITY ' If Federal funds are the basis for this contract, the Subgrantee certifies Ahat neither it-mwJts- principals are presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in transactions by any Federal department or agency. 14. ENTIRE CONTRACT/WAIVER OF DEFAULT This Agreement is the complete expression of the agreement of King County and the Subgrantee hereto, and any oral or written representations or understandings not incorporated herein are excluded. Waiver of any default shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent default. Waiver of breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be waiver of any other or subsequent breach and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of this Agreement unless stated to be such through written approval by King County, which shall be attached to the original Agreement. 15. SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Agreement is, for any reason, found to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Agreement. 16. APPROVAL This Agreement shall be subject to the written approval of the King County's authorized representative and shall not be binding until so approved. 6 FFY04-SHSP-009 THIS AGREEMENT, consisting of 7 pages and 2 attachments, is executed by the persons signing below who warrant and represent that they have the authority to execute the Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Agreement has been executed by each party on the date set forth ' below: City of Kent King Co. Office of Erriggency Management BY Name & Title County Administrative Officer ■ Date Date 7 y� FFY04-SHSP-009 EXHIBIT A: SCOPE OF WORK and PROJECT TIMELINE -FFY04 SHSP Project Name, Kent Springs Infiltration Gallery Security Improvements Project Contact Person, Title & Phone# Brad Lake, Water Superintendent, 253 856 5600 s - Identify Direct Link to "FFY04 State Homeland Security Program—C. Authorized Program Expenditures": Section C, Authorized Program Expenditures, Allowable Equipment Costs, Page 23, #7. Barriers Fences, Jersey Walls Choose one Primary Goal and Objective from the "Washington State Homeland Security Strategy" that relates directly to the Project: Goal 4, Objective 1 4— (3 1 2 Develop countermeasures and acquire necessary resourc,�F fo protect critical infrastructures (4 1.4)) SCOPE OF WORK—NARRATIVE (Limit two pages) Project Description (Well-defined purpose; breakdown of activities Into clear, concise actions; and measurable deliverables, results and end products.): In December of 2003 the City of Kent Public Works Water Department completed its Vulnerability Assessment (VA)in accordance with the requirements of the Public Health Security and Bioterronsm Preparedness Act of 2002 In the VA Final Report, Priority 1 recommendations for the most important resources focus on access to those facilities, particularly deterring and delaying access to those areas of greatest sensitivity such as the infiltration gallery where the groundwater is actually taken in to the water system, and Control and Well buildings. 1 Currently those areas are only protected by the chain-link perimeter fencing which surrounds the overall watershed area and are very susceptible to attacks once an intruder has gained access to the interior of the compound The Priority 1 recommendations for the City's second primary source, Kent Springs include:"Add security fence around control building and surge tank" and "Add security fence around well 3 building" While the City would like to implement these recommendations, there is currently little or no funding available for hardening these facilities to the levels recommended in this assessment i if provided with funding, the City would install a total of approximately 1400 feet of security fence around the Kent Springs infiltration gallery, the Kent Springs Well Control building area, Kent Springs Well 2, and the Kent Springs Well 3 pump house The hardening of this infrastructure with new security fencing would work to prohibit or delay entry and deter many kinds of threats from the date of installation with little or no long-term maintenance costs On the uniform risk scale ranging from 0 (lowest risk)to 1 (highest risk)this improvements reduce the original risk level from 0 81 down to an updated risk of 0 45 and are rated "High"in the detection and delay areas of "effectiveness to prevent/mitigate adversary success" The result of this project would be greater protection of the City of Kent's second primary water source and a great reduction of the risk of adversarial attack currently faced at this location The City of Kent supplies water to over 50,000 residents of King County and is the major warehouse and transportation hub for the South end of the County as well In addition to the potable water supply for residential and business use, the City of Kent Fire and Life Safety department is dependent on the Kent water supply for 1 adequate water to provide fire protection for these residents and businesses. In case of fire or malicious attack at any of Kent's warehouses or many hazardous material facilities, this supply is critical to the safety of these many citizens In addition, through the use of 2-way interties, the City of Kent can supply water as needed to each of the Cities and Water Districts around it including, King County Water District#111, Covington Water, Highline Water District, and the Cities of Auburn, Renton, and Tukwila The hardening of these parts of this critical infrastructure through increased security fencing protects both the health and safety of many of the residents of South King County as well as providing fire protection for the 3ro largest warehouse distribution center in the United States and a back-up water supply to surrounding Cities and Water Districts The security fencing and jersey barriers recommended in this project simply and significantly reduce the risk of damage or destruction to this municipal water supply at minimal cost and little or no future maintenance costs 8 FFY04-SHSP-009 PROJECT TIMELINE (Include measurable activities for task completion and critical dates. Projects must be completed and delivered prior to October 1, 2005.) Activity Estimated ' Completion Date Outline precise plans and create bid specifications 10/1/04 Advertise for bids, complete bid process and award 1/1/05 Receive equipment onsite 3/1/05 Job inspected and approved 4/1/05 , Final billing and payment processed,job completed. 5/31/05 i I t 1 I i 1 I 9 , FFY04-SHSP-009 j EXHIBIT B: BUDGET ATTACH ONE BUDGET SHEET PER CATEGORY This is a reimbursement grant PASS THROUGH BUDGET- FFY04 SHSP Identify Budget Category (Planning, Training, Exercise, or Equipment:_Equipment ITEM DESCRIPTION COST SALARIES & BENEFITS (Not for payment of overtime) OVERTIME/BACKFILL EQUIPMENT (see Excel spreadsheet for detailed listing) $13,200.00 TRAVEL AND PER DIEM GOODS AND SERVICES (Please Specify) CONSULTANT FEES OTHER COSTS (Please specify ) ' TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED PROJECT COST OR AWARD $13,200.00 AMOUNT • 10% of total award amount may be shifted between approved budget object codes Final signed invoice voucher to be submitted with final performance report& deliverables-Invoices not to exceed total amount of contract award I a l to FFY04-SHSP-009 , See attachment- KS Equip sheet FFY04 SHSP.xls i ! 11 ! Kent City Council Meeting ' UgW December 13. 2005 Categoryonsent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: LIFELINE UTILITY RATE ORDINANCE—ADOPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No. amending Chapter 7.01 of the Kent City Code, entitled "Utility Service Billing," to include a new section aligning eligibility requirements for the lifeline utility rate with those set by the Federal Housing and Urban Development office in order to standardize the process within the City. ' 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director's memorandum and Ordinance 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes X No If no. Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund Amount $ 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds 1 DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6X PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Larry Blanchard, Public Works Director Phone 253-856-5500 Fax 253-856-6500 K E N T W A 5 M I N O T o N Address 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent, WA 98032-5895 DATE: November 16, 2005 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Mike Mactutis, Environmental Engineering Manager THROUGH: Larry Blanchard, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Lifeline Utility Rate Eligibility Requirements MOTION: Recommend authorization to adopt Ordinance No. which amends the income requirements of the lifeline utility rate to align it with those set by the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for a more standardized process within the City SUMMARY: Resolution No. 980, enacted by City Council on November 1, 1982 established eligibility requirements for the City's lifeline utility rate. It also provides that those eligible for the lifeline utility rate shall have incomes that do not exceed the amounts specified in RCW 84.36.381(5)(b). It is the City's desire to amend the income requirements of the lifeline utility rate to align it with those set by HUD for a more standardized process within the City. BUDGET IMPACT: No Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personnel Impact BACKGROUND: The lifeline utility rate reduces the standard water, sewer, solid waste, and storm utility rates for individuals at least 62 year of age, or permanently and totally disabled, and meeting certain income requirements. The City's Housing and Human Services Division follows the HUD income guidelines in administering its various programs funded entirely or in part by federal grants. These income requirements are adjusted annually whereas the income requirements in RCW 84.36.381(5)(b) are adjusted by the State on an irregular basis It is the City's desire to use the HUD income guidelines for a more standardized process within the City. It is also the City's desire to amend the code in order to codify the eligibility requirements for ease of access to the public. 1 t 1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the city council of the city of Kent, Washington, amending Chapter 7.01 of the Kent City Code, entitled "Utility Service Billing," to include a new section concerning eligibility requirements for the lifeline Iutility rate previously adopted by Resolution No. 980. RECITALS A. On November 1, 1982, the city council enacted Resolution No. 980, which established eligibility requirements for the city's lifeline utility rate as allowed by RCW 74.38.070. This utility rate reduces the standard water, sewer, solid waste, and storm utility rates for individuals at least 62 years of age, or permanently and totally disabled, and meeting certain income requirements. B. Resolution No. 980 provides that those eligible for the lifeline utility rate shall have incomes that do not exceed the amounts specified in RCW 84.36.381(5)(b), which provides property tax exemptions to eligible senior citizens and disabled persons. It is the city's desire to amend the income requirements of the lifeline utility rate to align it with those set by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD' for a more standardized process within the city. The city's housing and human services division follows the HUD income requirements in administering its various programs funded entirely or in part by federal grants. 1 Lifeline Utility Rate— New Section 7.01.080 KCC C. In addition to amending the income requirements of the lifeline utility rate, it is'staff's desire to amend the Kent City Code in order to codify the eligcbtility requirements and align them with the HUD requirements for ease of access to the public. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE SECTION 1. — Amendment — Lifeline Utility Rate. Chapter 7.01 of the Kent City Code, entitled "Utility Service Billing," is amended by adding a new section 7.01.080 as follows: Sec. 7.01.080. Lifeline Utility Rate. The lifeline utility rate is available only to utility customers qualifying under the following criteria: 1. The utility account shall be in the name of the individual owner or renter certifying eligibility for the lifeline utility rate. 2. That individual shall be or exceed 62 years of age at the time of filing or be permanently and totally disabled. 3. For a household of one or more individuals, the adjusted gross personal income for all individuals living in the household, as determined by Internal Revenue Service individual tax forms filed for the previous year, shall not exceed the income limits set annually by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD' concerning eligibility for HUD assisted housing programs. 4. Only one service charge reduction per utility will be given for each applicant and for each property served. 5. The service under which the lifeline utility rate is assessed shall be for single family residential purposes only. 6. Individuals must apply for the lifeline utility rate through the customer services division of the city's finance department located at the Centennial Center, 400 2 Lifeline Utility Rate— New Section 7.01.080 KCC West Gowe St., Kent, Washington. The application must be notarized and may be ==required to be submitted annually. 7. Determination of eligibility shall be made by the city's finance director, or his or her designee, based upon the information given in the eligible customer's application. 8. Upon approval of the application, the household will receive the reduced utility rate for water, sewer, solid waste, and storm utilities beginning the first day of the month following the date of the application. SECTION 2 - Amendment - Water Utility Rates Within the City Section 7.02.300(B) of the Kent City Code concerning water utility rates within the city and entitled "Lifeline customers," is amended as follows: Sec. 7.02.300. Water rates within the City. B. Lifeline customers. The city council has will-established eligibility criteria for lifeline customers, which is codified in KCC 7.01.080. For lifeline-qualified ` water service customers, the following rates apply for water use per one hundred (100) cubic feet: Effective Date January 1 -December 31 12/31/1999 $0.45 01/01/2003 $0.47 01/01/2004 $0.49 01/01/2005 $0.51 All lifeline rates are also subject to the monthly demand charge for service and meter as set forth in subsection (A) of this section. 3 Lifeline Utility Rate- New Section 7.01.080 KCC SECTION 3. — Amendment — Water Utility Rates Outside the City Section 7:02.310(B) of the rent City Code concerning water utility rates outside the city and entitled "Lifeline customers," is amended as follows: Sec. 7.02.310. Water rates outside city. B. Lifeline customers The city council has will established eligibility criteria for lifeline customers, which is codified in KCC 7.01.080. For lifeline-qualified water service customers, the following rates apply for water use per one hundred (100) cubic feet: Effective Date January t —December 31 12/31/1999 $0.48 01/01/2003 $0.50 01/01/2004 $0.53 01/01/2005 $0.56 All lifeline rates are also subject to the monthly demand charge for service and meter as set forth in subsection (A) of this section. SECTION 4. — Amendment — Solid Waste &§t y Rates. Section 7.03.030 of the Kent City Code concerning solid waste utility and entitled "Regulations regarding collection companies — Business license required," is amended by adding a new subsection as follows: Sec. 7.03.030. Regulations regarding collection companies — Business license required. A. To provide for the public health, safety and general welfare, collection companies operating within the city shall, at no additional cost to the city or its residents: 4 Lifeline Utility Rate— New Section 7.01.080 KCC 1. Comply with all provisions of the city code and amendments thereof, and applicable federal, state and county laws and regulations pertaining to the collection, handling, transportation and disposal of solid waste, recyclable materials and yard waste. The city shall be entitled, during regular business hours, to inspect the books and records of collection companies operating within the city; 2. Pick up Christmas trees each January; 3. Provide for a semiannual residential cleanup in the spring and fall of ' each year to allow for disposal of accumulated solid waste. The director of public works shall promulgate administrative rules, following consultation with collection companies, for the implementation of this subsection; 4. Provide service to public buildings and facilities, as designated by the director of public works. Upon consultation with collection companies, the director of public works may add or delete public facilities from such designation in the interests of public health and safety. 5. Extend the lifeline utility rate for solid waste, recyclable materials, and yard waste collection as adopted by the city under KCC 7.01.080 to eligible customers who have filed an approved application with the city. B. Collection companies operating pursuant to and in compliance with this chapter shall be issued, upon application, a business license pursuant to Ch. 5.01 KCC, without ' the payment of license fees, permit fees as provided in KCC 7.03.020(B), or other fees related to solid waste handling established by the city. This subsection (B) shall not be construed as a waiver of the utility tax imposed by Ch. 3.18 KCC. SECTION 5. — Amendment — .Sanitary Sewer Utility Rates. Section 7.04.280 of the Kent City Code concerning sanitary sewer utility rates and entitled "Schedule of charges for service," is amended as follows: Sec. 7.04.280. Schedule of charges for service. The following sanitary sewer service charges for service inside the city limits are in effect on the dates and in 5 Lifeline Utility Rate— New Section 7.01.080 KCC the amounts listed below. Sewer service charges for customers residing outside the - -- city shall be the charges as on file in the city clerk's office. — Type of Service Charge per Month Effective Effective on Effective on Effective on Effective on Effective Effective on through January 1, January 1, January 1, January 1, through January 1, December3l, 2005 2006 2007 2008 January 1, 2010 ' 2004 2009 1 Single-family residential dwelfi g,as $31 27 $33 62 $36 14 $38 85 $41 76 $44 89 $48 26 defined in Ch 15 02 KCC 2 Two-family or multiple-family residential $31 27 $33 62 $36 14 $38 85 $4176 $44 89 $48 26 dwelling,as defined in Ch 15 02 KCC,each unit separately charged 3 Single-family residential/hfehne eligibility $28 65 $30 93 $33 24 $35 74 $38 42 $41 30 $44 40 criteria for the lifeline utility rate shall be esWb'shed by-ery �uae'is set forth in KCC 7 01 080 4 All other than single-family residential shall $4 17 per 100 $4 49 per 100 be billed in accordance with the consumption cubic feet per cubic feet per of water and at the following rate,except that month month no monthly bill shall be less than the single- family residential rate set forth in servKe type No 1 SECTION 6. —Amendment—Storm and Surface Water Utility Rates Section 7.05.130(4) of the Kent City Code concerning storm and surface water utility rates and entitled "Rate reductions - Credits," is amended as follows: ' Sec. 7.05.130. Rate reductions — Credits. The finance director, upon t direction of the director of public works or designee, shall reduce (credit) the normal storm and surface water utility charge for a parcel of real property when the public works department finds: 4. The owner or renter of a single-family residential parcel of real , property qualifies under KCC 7.01.080 mere' eig 980 for lifeline rates. In such cases, the lifeline charge rate for the qualifying customer shall be ninety-two cents ($0.92) per month, and basin-specific charges pursuant to KCC 7.05.090(B)(5) shall not be imposed. SECTION 7, — Revea/er. Resolution No. 980 of the city of Kent, adopted November 1, 1982, is hereby repealed in its entirety by this ordinance. SECTION 8, — Severabdity If any one or more section, subsections, or sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision 6 Lifeline Utility Rate — New Section 7,01.080 KCC ' shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same ' shall remaFnwrfL&force and effect. 1 SECTION 9. — Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its passage as provided by law. JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: ' BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK ' APPROVED AS TO FORM: TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED: day of 0 2005. APPROVED: day of . 2005. PUBLISHED: day of , 2005. ' I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed by the city council of the city of Kent, Washington, and approved by the mayor of the city of Kent as hereon indicated. (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK v�CRD[WN UWneIAI�RU701Urc ' 7 Lifeline Utility Rate— New Section 7.01.080 KCC Kent City Council Meeting ' n Dat�, _December 13, 2005 'Category'Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN MIRAI ASSOCIATES, INC. CONTRACT— AUTHORIZE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorize the Mayor to sign the Consultant Services Agreement between the City and Mirai Associates, Inc. for Project Management of the Transportation Master Plan, Phase 1. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director's memorandum 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc ) 5. FISCAL IMPACT ' Expenditure9 Yes Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes X No If no: Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund Amount $ 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds ' DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No 6Y PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Larry R Blanchard, Public Works Director -4400 Fax 253-856-6500 K E N T WASHINOTON Address 220 Fourth Avenue S ' Kent, WA 98032-5895 DATE: December 5, 2005 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Steve Mullen, Transportation Engineering Manager THROUGH. Larry Blanchard, Public Works Director ' SUBJECT: Transportation Master Plan (TMP)—Consultant Contract MOTION: Recommend the Council authorize the Mayor to sign the Consultant Services Agreement between the City of Kent and Mirai Associates, Inc. for Project Management of the Transportation Master Plan, Phase 1 For a detailed description of the tasks to be performed, see the Scope of Work which is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference SUMMARY: Consultant services are needed to update the Transportation Master Plan including the Concurrency Management System, determination of the Arterial Network and Level of Service Standards, a Financing Plan, Transit Plan, Transportation Design Standards, Transportation Demand Management Strategies, and a final Plan with transportation goals and policies which reflect the vision and values of the community. BUDGET IMPACT:No Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personnel Impact. The funding for the Transportation Master Plan, a 2 '/2 year project, has already been allocated and approved in the ' budget by Council. This particular contract is for an amount not to exceed $419,000.00. BACKGROUND: The TMP will provide an update/rewrite of the 1984 City of Kent 1 Comprehensive Transportation Plan In response to population increases and traffic congestion, changes to land use designations, annexations, new east/west corridors, and major downtown revitalization projects, the Transportation Master Plan is in need of a thorough review and major ' revisions Phase 1 will expand upon the Transportation Element of the 2004 Comprehensive Plan, identify the transportation system needs to implement the adopted land use plan through 2030, and develop funding strategies necessary to support those future needs including a complete revision of the Concurrency Management Ordinance Phase 1 will also include a transit study and will produce a short term and long range Kent Transit Plan. The project is being conducted in two phases in order to provide a concentrated effort on the most pressing issues of development and traffic This study will consider new revenues dedicated to the transportation system, including, but not limited to, traffic impact fees It will ' look at new methodologies for characterizing transportation system performance and assessing impacts of development projects. For more details on the Scope please see Exhibit A, attached. r Exhibit A- Scope of Work Task 0: Project Management-C.O�S'A\P'�a�c�C�tiy\each ' CONSULTANT will provide project administration and serve as a liaison to City staff throughout the plan development and adoption. Each month CONSULTANT will prepare a status report of work completed, summarizing the percent of task completed compared with budget spent, schedule, budget status and key contacts made during the penod CONSULTANT will develop and maintain a detailed schedule for completion of key tasks CONSULTANT will ' provide document review and quality assurance through its QA/QC program. CONSULTANT's project manager will meet in-person at least monthly with the City project manager and communicate regularly by phone and email. As needed, a biweekly conference call will be conducted with key team members. ' Team Kick-off Meeting CONSULTANT will plan, lead and participate in a project kick-off meeting with City of Kent project management team to determine project success measures, confirm project background and critical path items, and achieve a collective understand about the anticipated project results. The meeting will also establish common goals and objectives regarding public participation Deliverables: Monthly progress reports; invoices; schedule updates, key actions from project meetings. ' Kick-off meeting summary Task 1: Issues Identification-CM\k S\WSWR\arc�C��y\each ' CONSULTANT will review federal, state, regional, and City requirements/guidelines for plan completion. CONSULTANT will obtain and review relevant planning documents from City Staff and other agencies (WSDOT, PSRC, King County and adjacent cities). CONSULTANT will determine the relationship and connection to other planning efforts within the City, county, region, and state CONSULTANT will use the results from the staff issues workshop conducted in November 2005 to determine a set of key transportation issues. CONSULTANT will conduct informal ' Exhibit A- Scope of Work 1 interviews with up to eight(8) City staff individually or in small groups to review and detail ' these key transportation issues. CONSULTANT will review and finalize these results with the Project Management Team. Deliverables List of transportation issues and available documents ' Task 2: Transportation Needs Assessment-CD�S��\��\\eac�,C.��y CONSULTANT will conduct a needs assessment of the following transportation factors: • Streets, Including Freight and Safety , • Bicycle and Pedestrians (by other team members) • Transit Conditions (by other team members) • Transportation Demand Management The analysis will include an examination of both existing and future conditions, as described below. Task 2A: Streets - CONSULTANT lead, City support Existing Conditions , CONSULTANT will assemble existing traffic counts and identify locations for supplemental counts. City will collect up to 60 PM peak period intersection traffic counts and 20 3-to7 day roadway tube counts. These counts will include estimates of trucks, buses, and pedestrians where possible. City will collect intersection queue data at up to 20 of the high volume intersections , CONSULTANT will calculate levels of service during the PM peak hour at up to 60 intersections The city will provide CONSULTANT with Synchro files and intersection data sheets from previous studies. CONSULTANT will conduct spot field reviews of all intersections to verify lane geometries and signal phasing. CONSULTANT will calculate intersection levels of service with Synchro. , CONSULTANT will prepare examples of alternative ways of measuring roadway LOS (level of ' service), including corridor and Subarea approaches (Refer to Task 9). CONSULTANT will review these methodologies with staff and the advisory committee CONSULTANT will calculate alternative LOS using the preferred method chosen by the city. Exhibit A- Scope of Work 2 CONSULTANT will obtain the city's current functional classification system. CONSULTANT will compare the functional classification with systems in adjacent jurisdictions with contiguous I - -roads, CONSULTANT will review available data about freight rail and available truck pattern information. CONSULTANT will include available information related to railroad crossing safety CONSULTANT will obtain accident data from the City and WSDOT for the past three years. The consultant will summarize identified High Accident Locations on the city street system. From these studies and data, CONSULTANT will analyze existing street conditions. ' CONSULTANT will identify deficiencies in safety, mobility and access for roadway users CONSULTANT will identify roadways that should be examined further for potential functional ' classification changes Deliverables Transportation Element chapter section documenting existing transportation conditions and issues. Future Conditions 1 CONSULTANT will develop forecasts of future growth using adopted land use projections and identified transportation improvement projects. The resulting travel forecasts will be used to evaluate future transportation needs. Assemble Land Use Forecasts The city will prepare a description of existing (2005) and future (20t5 and 2030) land use build- out characteristics in the city based on the Comprehensive Plan, zoning densities and intensities, census information, and the Buildable Lands data This will provide the basis for estimating trip generation within the transportation planning areas of the City. City staff will compile existing mapped information using GIS technology as available tCONSULTANT and city staff will conduct an internal workshop to allocate 2015 and 2030 growth to traffic analysis zones. This allocation will be consistent with planned development ("pipeline") projects that will be provided by the city. CONSULTANT will research and provide land use data for traffic analysis zones outside of the city limits, using data available from the PSRC, King County, and adjacent cities Exhibit A- Scope of Work 3 Deliverables: ' Maps and spreadsheets shownV3.wd.use forecasts (2030) by traffic analysis zone throughout the ' planning area. Identify Programmed and Planned Projects CONSULTANT will assemble all relevant transportation plans and programs that affect the City, including Kent's six-year TIP, WSDOT's long range transportation plan, King County and Sound Transit's facility plans, and the Puget Sound Regional Council Metropolitan Transportation Plan. L Deliverables: Tabular listing and map of programmed and planned projects. Prepare Travel Forecasts , CONSULTANT will prepare a base year(2005), 2015, and build-out 2030 traffic forecasting model for the PM peak hour. The 2015 model data will be interpolated between the 2005 and 2030 data unless the City is able to provide 2015 land use forecasts. CONSULTANT will work with City staff to validate the Kent travel forecast model for the study area. The City will provide electronic files of the current V ISUM model structure As part of this effort, CONSULTANT will integrate the City of Kent's transportation planning model attributes into the recently released PSRC multi-modal travel demand model Key attributes to , be examined and used in this sub-area approach will include current and future land use, zonal definition and network assumptions The City's zone system will be modified as needed The model will distinguish between traffic generated by growth within the City and that ' generated by growth outside the City limits. CONSULTANT will summarize traffic volumes attributable to land use growth within the City's UGA The forecasts will be directly derived from the Kent model and include planned development("pipeline") projects in the Kent model's traffic analysis zones (TAZs) within the City CONSULTANT will post-process the raw output from the model to obtain consistent volumes throughout corridors. Deliverables Memorandum documenting the existing model validation and future forecasts (2015, 2030) Model electronic files and spreadsheets , Exhibit A- Scope of Work 4 Future Needs and Opportunities CONSULTANT and the City will identify projected future roadway needs using the results of the future forecasts and previous planning efforts. CONSULTANT will prepare two primary ' road networks as directed by the city CONSULTANT will run up to six additional sensitivity tests with the 2030 model to assess possible new road connections or other improvements. For each of the three primary networks, CONSULTANT will post-process the 2030 volumes ' from the model for up to 30 intersections and calculate PM peak hour intersection levels of service with Synchro. CONSULTANT will also calculate LOS using an alternative methodology as directed by staff. For sensitivity tests, CONSULTANT will document changes in traffic patterns and volumes but will not produce intersection-level LOS or other post- processed results. The City will select a preferred 2030 roadway network. Using this network, the CONSULTANT will produce 2015 PM peak hour forecasts The CONSULTANT will use these results to recommend a phasing plan for implementing the preferred network over the next 25 years. At direction from the City, the CONSULTANT will prepare a detailed 2015 VISSIM simulation for I roadway corridors or spot locations including up to a total of ten (10) intersections. The VISSIM simulation will be used by the City and CONSULTANT to recommend specific short-term traffic operational improvements at these locations. CONSULTANT will analyze possible changes in functional classification related to the future street volumes and travel patterns. CONSULTANT will evaluate identified safety problem locations with respect to changes in traffic volumes. Deliverables Master Plan section documenting the analysis of future needs and recommended street network. Costs CONSULTANT will prepare two sets of cost estimates The first set will be order-of-magnitude costs for an initial set of street transportation concepts. These costs will be based on engineering judgment and used to provide input to the initial financing plan. The second set will be planning level cost estimates for up to 30 street improvement recommendations, using a project cost model This process will involve producing comparative studies of proposed implementation projects including conceptual designs and related cost estimates The intent of these studies will be to test proposed transportation solutions such as intersection or corridor improvements in 1 Exhibit A- Scope of Work 5 terms of factors such as right-of-way needs, geometric configurations, and enhancements like lighting, landscaping, and signage The City will provide CONSULTANT with available aerial photographs for each of these locations CONSULTANT will conduct a field visit for each recommended improvement to validate basic design assumptions Deliverables 25-year project lists and planning-level costs Develop Final Streets Master Plan CONSULTANT will develop a Draft and Final City of Kent Streets Master Plan. Materials developed in this task will be compiled into a Streets Element for the City's Transportation Master Plan. Deliverables Draft and Final City of Kent Streets Element for Transportation Master Plan Task 2113: Pedestrian and Bicycles- The purpose of this task is to identify and inventory the existing pedestrian and bicycle system , within the City of Kent, develop a GIS database, and conduct spatial analyses to identify priority pedestrian and bicycle improvements. Planning-level cost estimates will be integrated, and the spatial analyses and prioritized improvements will consider accessibility to public transit, schools, parks, civic centers and other critical factors. A Draft Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan will be coordinated with the other modal element and financial planning efforts A Final Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan will reflect this coordination, and include design guidelines for effective Plan implementation. The CONSULTANT will provide advice and review to the City in the conduct of this analysis, which will be conducted by a separate consultant. The CONSULTANT will incorporate the results of this task into the overall Transportation Master Plan. Deliverables Review comments on Technical Memoranda produced by others (four) Review of Draft Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan documentation produced by others Task 2C: Transit - CONSULTANT lead, City support The purpose of the city's transit plan is to provide the city with clear and implementable recommendations that will: help to strengthen the City's share of regional transit funding and service hours; suggest new service that improve local circulation(particularly for seniors and Exhibit A- Scope of Work 6 special needs populations); and improve connections between employment sites/centers and Sounder Commuter Rail and Sound Transit Express Bus services. ' The CONSULTANT will examine current and future needs for public transportation, identification of barriers to the use of transit, review of current and future public transportation services and a set of recommendations for future services. CONSULTANT will ascertain the need for, and attitudes toward, public transportation via a random telephone survey of local residents and a series of discussions with local stakeholders including employers, social service agencies, educators, developers, planning staff and policy makers. CONSULTANT will examine barriers both in terms of 1) individuals inability to access public transportation, knowledge of existing services and/or hesitancy to use available services; and 2) limitations to the use of public transportation from the built environment resulting from local regulations and policies as well as existing development patterns resulting from market influences. The Kent Transit Master Plan will be delivered as a stand-alone document as well as providing input to the transit element of the Kent Transportation Master Plan. ' Design and Implement General Public Survey CONSULTANT will develop and implement a general public telephone survey to collect statistically valid data from a sample of the general population in the City of Kent. A random telephone survey provides the greatest opportunity to reach a broad segment of community members, including those that currently do not ride public transportation.i The survey will collect data on Why certain groups use/don't use transit? Barriers to transit"paratransit use. • Community perceptions of public transportation. Community perceptions of important features/services of public transportation. • Propensity to switch to transit given certain factors/improvements • Current travel patterns. • Household/personal demographic/employment data. CONSULTANT will develop the telephone survey instrument; arrange implementation through a call center, monitor data collection quality control and evaluate and analyze survey data. CONSULTANT will seek City approval on the survey instrument prior to conducting the survey. CONSULTANT will utilize the services of Strategic Consulting and Research (market research firm specializing in transportation survey and focus groups) to execute the survey. The survey is 1 Since only a few percent of the total population use transit on a regular basis,a random call household survey will reach a broad segment of the non-rider population ' Exhibit A- Scope of Work 7 i assumed to include a 45 question survey to 400 random residents, resulting in+/-5% accuracy with a 95% confidence level Z CONSULTANT will address identified barriers including the potential use of individualized marketing efforts to inform residents when public transportation is an option for them personally, review local outreach to see how public transportation is promoted a benefit and expansion of the successful Commute Trip Reduction program. Survey results will also help us identify public transportation needs in terms of availability of service, span of operation and level of service. Deliverables. Survey Instrument , • Complete set of survey results in Excel format • Technical memorandum detailing survey results with easy to read tabular and graphical ' exhibits where appropriate Identify Barriers to the Use of Public Transportation ' The CONSULTANT will review existing policies and regulations, including applicable ' subdivision regulations and zoning code, to identify any barriers to the use of public transportation The CONSULTANT will map existing routes as well as boardings and alightmgs by stop over maps of population and employment density by TAZ This provides an excellent tool for identifying gaps in service and determining where more detailed analysis is required to identify why services are performing poorly. In addition, . In addition, CONSULTANT will interview local planning staff and representative developers to ascertain other real and/or perceived obstacles to the development of transit supportive streets and communities. Areas of investigation will include: , • Street design including connectivity standards, street width, intersection and cross walk geometries; • LOS standards for all modes of travel; • Parking requirements (maximums instead of minimums are appropriate); Incorporation of pedestrian and bicycle facilities; • Transit related development code requirements; and • Transit supporting densities, diversity of uses and street level design. CONSULTANT will provide examples of best practices from peer communities that have developed model code language to support transit and TDM performance. Based on these Z A survey sample size larger than 400 would provide only minimal improvements in the reliability of data and would add significant cost Exhibit A- Scope of Work 8 findings, CONSULTANT will offer revised code language and alternate development models where appropriate. ' Deliverables Technical Memorandum on findings and recommendations Develop Short- and Long-Term Public Transportation Service Plans CONSULTANT will examine the performance of regional services as well as local routes (or the use of regional routes for local trips), comparing service quality and ridership with local tdemographics to determine where opportunities exist to improve services and fulfill unmet needs. The analysis will address existing and future services in terms of travel opportunities based on: • Destinations (local/regional, workleducation/personal errand); • Time of travel; • Cost of travel; • Connections to other services/modes; • Utilization of Park-and-Ride facilities • Demographic characteristics (population and employment density are key drivers of transit demand, and • Attitudes and needs of Kent residents and transit oriented development opportunities Working with King County Metro and Sound Transit, CONSULTANT will identify and review short- and long-range plans for service changes. Two short-range and two long-range service alternatives will be presented to the City for review and refinement The CONSULTANT will relate these to any identified transit projects in the PSRC Long Range Plans (Destination 2030) and any identified needs from the public survey CONSULTANT will relate these to any identified transit projects in the PSRC Long Range Plans (Destination 2030) and any identified needs from the public survey. CONSULTANT will provide a series of recommendations for futures services at the local and regional level. Recommendations will include a timeframe for implementation, potential funding sources, operating/governance opportunities and obstacles ' facing the specified services The CONSULTANT will review City development codes and concurrency ordinances and identify opportunities to ensure that transit needs are met in future through the development review process and to examine the possibility of incorporating transit into concurrency review. ' Deliverables: Technical Memorandum on findings and recommendations Implementation Action Plan Exhibit A- Scope of Work 9 Develop Final Transit Master Plan CONSULTANT will develop a Draft and Final City of Kent Transit Master Plan. This will be available as a stand-alone document. Relevant recommendations and policies from the Plan will be included in a more condensed Transit Element for the City's Transportation Master Plan. Deliverables: Draft and Final City of Kent Transit Master Plan Transit Element for Transportation Master Plan Task 21): Transportation Demand Management-C�\�S`�����\�\each t The transportation demand management (TDM) component of the Master Plan will identify specific programs, policy and funding opportunities, and steps needed to support Kent's transportation system The TDM element for the transportation master plan will support a strong mix of travel options for the area and offer tools to achieve and maintain alternative mode usage goals for the community. CONSULTANT will assemble available information regarding Commute Trip Reduction and other TDM programs that exist within the city. Using these data, CONSULTANT will identify opportunities for enhanced TDM emphasis that will support the transit and pedestrian/bicycle elements of the plan CONSULTANT will also identify active TDM programs to support parking management schemes and offer tools to encourage shared uses and subsequently reduce parking needs Deliverables: Transportation Demand Management summary and recommendations for the TMP Task 3: Policy Development - City lead, CONSULTANT support The purpose of this task is to prepare a complete set of policies to guide the development and implementation of the long-range transportation plan CONSULTANT will support City staff by critiquing and refining transportation goals, objectives and policies to make sure that they are consistent with GMA requirements. CONSULTANT will support City staff by critiquing and refining transportation goals, objectives ' and policies to make sure that they are consistent with GMA requirements CONSULTANT will provide input on existing and new policies based on comments from community meetings, and , issues learned during the needs assessment process CONSULTANT will also provide a brief critique of Goals and Policies in comparison with other agencies. City staff will develop new Exhibit A- Scope of Work 10 policies and modify existing policies. CONSULTANT will review and comment on the proposed policies. Deliverables: Transportation element chapter section documenting transportation policies (City lead) Task 4: Funding- CONSULTANT Lead; City Support The purpose of this task is to identify and analyze funding sources for the six-year list of transportation improvements, resulting in a financially feasible Transportation Element for the City of Kent. CONSULTANT will interview up to ten (10) City and community stakeholders to identify various funding issues, including those related to Transportation Impact Fees. Using the interviews and a review of finance data provided by the City, the CONSULTANT will evaluate Kent's historical and current practices related to transportation financing. CONSULTANT will identify specific sources of revenue that are available to finance transportation improvements and programs (including unused, under-used and innovative revenues and strategies) The potential revenues will include existing and new sources of revenue, and identification of any restrictions on their use. The CONSULTANT will work with City staff to include life cycle costs as a factor in planning, prioritizing and financing transportation improvement projects. The City will provide recent historical transportation capital expenditures in the City, including specific sources and amounts of revenue that paid for each capital improvement. The capital improvements will cover various modes, including streets, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and transit-support facilities. CONSULTANT will develop a list of most promising potential future funding sources, initial estimates of amounts likely to be available and identify projects that would be eligible for each funding source. Forecasts will include short-term (6-year) and long-term (20-year) projections. CONSULTANT will review the initial funding estimates with the City and provide ongoing consultation during the development of cost-feasible (financially constrained) transportation improvements. 1 CONSULTANT will coordinate the development of prioritization criteria for transportation improvements with the development of financing strategies in order to ensure that priorities and financing are consistent and feasible. Exhibit A- Scope of Work 11 CONSULTANT will provide information about financial strategies in formats that are appropriate for helping stakeholders and the community to provide opinions and suggestions concerning financing strategies. CONSULTANT will support and participate in community involvement activities that address financing strategies for the Transportation Element The final financing plan will include recommendations on the potential actions that the City can take to minimize any funding shortfalls for identified transportation needs The financing plan will include all modes being considered in the TMP. Deliverables Evaluation of current transportation financing strategies. Initial financial strategy for the Transportation Element. Financial strategy chapter section for the Transportation Element Task 5: Recommendations - CONSULTANT and City Lead The purpose of this task is to develop a set of multimodal transportation improvements that meet the long-term planning needs of the City The recommendations will include planning-level cost , estimates developed as part of the modal tasks. CONSULTANT will work with the City to summarize the projected future transportation needs and recommend improvements for all modes. The 25-year recommendations will cover topics addressed in the needs assessment, including traffic levels of service, functional classification, street continuity,pedestrian and bicycle facilities, transit, and freight mobility. CONSULTANT will develop a list of criteria that will be used to evaluate transportation improvement concepts and to establish project priorities. CONSULTANT will suggest a prioritization process to the City to establish an implementation schedule. CONSULTANT will recommend a phased implementation program, including a short term 6-year list of improvements Deliverable• I List of 25-year recommended improvements with 6-year priorities Task 6: Environmental Review (SEPA)-CONS���PC��\eac�,Cy ' The purpose of this task will be to develop and implement an environmental review process that will complement the transportation planning. The intent will be to ensure that impacts associated with possible transportation improvements are identified as early as possible so that they can be adjusted to be as "impact-free" as possible. Exhibit A- Scope of Work 12 The CONSULTANT will discuss with City staff the actual format and content of the environmental portion of the document. Options may include preparation of an environmental checklist, the optional "non-project review form" developed by Ecology in 2002-03, or a planned action approach—if the environmental review is expected to address specific implementation actions It is assumed for budget purposes that an environmental checklist approach will be used in the analysis. Deliverables Environmental scoping documents, Impact assessment discussion papers Draft and final environmental review components of the plan. Task 7: Final Plan - CONSULTANT lead; City support The purpose of the final plan is to bring together the results of the technical and policy analyses to create a Transportation Master Plan CONSULTANT will prepare a draft Transportation Master Plan with active input from City staff especially in the development of recommendations and policy changes The City and CONSULTANT will agree on the content and format of the plan prior to development of any materials Maps and graphics in the reports will be prepared both by CONSULTANT and the City CONSULTANT will submit a draft plan to the City for review and will prepare draft SEPA nonproject documentation The City will take the lead on issuing the SEPA determination and will coordinate with affected jurisdictions CONSULTANT will circulate the final draft to the City, which will be responsible for final edits and publication Deliverables Two (2) unbound, camera ready (reproducible) Draft reports and one (1) unbound, camera ready (reproducible) * Final Report hard copy and one final electronic copy, as well as CD printed versions Task 8: Public Involvement-CO�S���PN�anc�C.�ty�eac� iThe purpose of this task is to engage the public in determining and prioritizing transportation issues for all modes of transportation and to provide opportunity to be actively involved in identifying transportation solutions that best serve the City of Kent's community vision and particular transportation needs It is envisioned that this scope will provide the flexibility to mix and match outreach services to best serve the transportation master planning process as it unfolds. IThe CONSULTANT will participate with the City and another consultant to implement the public involvement program Exhibit A- Scope of Work 13 Stakeholder Interviews—Stakeholder Involvement Plan The CONSULTANT will participate in interviews with up to 3 stakeholders as identified by City Staff The purpose of the interviews will be to accumulate detailed information about issues and ' expectations concerning the Transportation Master Plan and explore the most effective methods of reaching out to the constituency they represent. The CONSULTANT will review the summaries of each interview and the Public Outreach Plan to be prepared by others. Deliverables: Review of summary notes for each interview Review of Draft Public Outreach Plan. Ad-Hoc Advisory Committee CONSULTANT will deliver up to six interactive presentations to an Ad-Hoc Advisory Committee It is anticipated that the meetings will be scheduled in coordination with key project milestones to be determined during development of the study schedule CONSULTANT will lead the Ad-Hoc Committee through a project visioning exercise at the first of these meetings. This exercise will assist in establishing and understanding clear success measures and the range of project objectives from the community's perspective. From this point on, it is anticipated that the presentations will be informal show-and-tell with opportunities for feedback from the Ad- L Hoc Committee. Committee protocols will be established at the first meeting to clarify meeting ground rules and the roles and responsibilities of committee members. It is expected that this group will serve as ambassadors for the project. The CONSULTANT will prepare a draft agenda for each meeting City staff will send out the , agenda and arrange for a meeting location for each meeting. The CONSULTANT will make copies of materials to be provided to the committee members. City staff and the CONSULTANT will take minutes for each meeting and will collaborate on review prior to finalization. Deliverables Six facilitated meetings (assumes City and CONSULTANT jointly take minutes) Public Works Committee CONSULTANT will prepare for and participate in up to three Council Public Works Committee meetings. Exhibit A- Scope of Work 14 t Deliverables. Attendance and Participation in Presentations _ Council Meetings CONSULTANT will prepare for and participate in up to four Council workshops and two regular Council meetings. Deliverables: Attendance and Participation in Presentations Overall Summary of Public Involvement Process CONSULTANT will review the summary of activities conducted during the transportation master plan and common themes received during the process and to be inserted into the Master Plan. Outreach Collateral Materials Video Script: CONSULTANT will review the 10-minute script prepared for the Mayor. LNewsletters. CONSULTANT will work with City to communicate key planning steps and methods for citizen participation and input into easy-to-understand, graphically friendly newsletters. The CONSULTANT will provide written material and draft graphics to the City's Public Outreach Consultant, who will prepare final camera-ready documents Up to three newsletters are assumed. 1 Web Site Support: The CONSULTANT will provide written material and draft graphics to the City's Public Outreach Consultant, who will prepare materials for the City's Web-page. Deliverables Review comments on one 10-minute video script for City of Kent Mayor • Written input to and review of three project newsletters Written input to Web graphics (all project related graphics will be provided in a format suitable for the web) Task 9: Concurrency- CONSULTANT lead; City support The purpose of this task is to examine the county's concurrency management system with respect to Level of Service policies, concurrency ordinance, and implementation procedures. Exhibit A- Scope of Work 15 i CONSULTANT will interview up to six (6) City and community stakeholders and evaluate Kent's current transportation concurrency ordinance and implementation program. CONSULTANT will present concurrency alternatives to the City and community CONSULTANT will assist the City and community in reviewing concurrency alternatives and expressing preferences about changes to the existing concurrency program. CONSULTANT will summarize the proposed changes to the concurrency program in the form of a"blueprint" that can be reviewed and evaluated by the City and community before the concurrency program is modified. , Included in the concurrency review will be a detailed examination of the City's current LOS methodology. CONSULTANT will examine the basic concept of a zonal-based system, as well as a corridor-based approach CONSULTANT will compare concurrency provisions for a variety of agencies near to or within King and Pierce Counties. CONSULTANT will help develop simple post-processing techniques to consistently calculate LOS across a range of facility types and geographic areas in the City. The consultant will recommend any modifications to the City's concurrency ordinance and identify an outline of possible changes in administrative procedures. Deliverables Evaluation of existing concurrency ordinance and program. "Blueprint" of proposed concurrency program Modifications to Concurrency Ordinance Modifications to Concurrency Administrative Procedures Task 10: Traffic Impact Fees- CONSULTANT lead; City support The purpose of this task is to calculate transportation impact fee rates and prepare a transportation impact fee ordinance so that new development will pay its proportionate share of , transportation improvements needed in the City of Kent. CONSULTANT will begin by interviewing up to ten (10) City and community stakeholders , (included with interviews in Task 4) and evaluate Kent's current practices related to transportation impact mitigation and impact fees. CONSULTANT will then undertake the following steps to prepare the impact fee program: Clarify Assumptions • Review LOS Standard(Refer Task 9) • Prepare Project List • Conduct Deficiency Analysis • Allocate Growth to Projects • Determine Cost Basis • Prepare Financial Estimates Exhibit A- Scope of Work 16 i • Prepare Fee Schedule, including specific Land Uses and Trip Generation Rates CONSULTANT will prepare for and attend up to two workshops with affected parties within the City. City staff will arrange for the logistics of the workshops and will make invitations. CONSULTANT will prepare presentation materials and summarize the meeting results for input to the final impact fee recommendations. CONSULTANT will prepare a rate study that documents the methodology and data used to calculate the impact fee rates. This report will be adopted by reference within the impact fee ordinance. CONSULTANT will provide input on the traffic impact fee ordinance to be prepared by the City Attorney, and adoption by the City Council. CONSULTANT will recommend how to integrate the impact fee system with the current development review and concurrency management process. Deliverables Evaluation of current transportation mitigation and impact mitigation program. Workshop (2)materials and summaries Impact Fee Rate study Impact Fee Ordinance. Implementation and administrative procedures (Phase 2) t 1 - t 1 r Exhibit A- Scope of Work 17 Kent City Council Meeting Date December 13, 2005 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN THE TRANSPO GROUP, INC. CONTRACT—AUTHORIZE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorize the Mayor to sign the Consultant Services Agreement between the City and The Transpo Group, Inc for the Kent Pedestrian and Bicycle element of the Transportation Master Plan, Phase 1. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director's memorandum 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc ) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? Yes Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes X No If no: Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund Amount $ 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6Z 1 1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - Larry R Blanchard, Public VV rks`Director - Phone 253-856-5500 Fax 253-856-6500 K E N T I W A 5 H I H G T O N Address 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent, WA 98032-5895 DATE: December 5, 2005 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Steve Mullen, Transportation Engineering Manager THROUGH: Larry Blanchard, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Transportation Master Plan (TMP)—Consultant Contract MOTION: Recommend the Council authorize the Mayor to sign the Consultant Services Agreement between the City of Kent and The Transpo Group, Inc. for the Kent Pedestrian & Bicycle element of the Transportation Master Plan, Phase 1. For a detailed description of the tasks to be performed, see the Scope of Work which is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference. SUMMARY: Consultant services are needed to conduct inventories, identify measurable accessibility indices based on available and appropriate GIS data, quantify and summarize improvement priorities, integrate cost measures and estimate system improvements costs, develop design guidelines and recommend policies relating to pedestrian and bicycle system enhancements and ADA compliance. BUDGET IMPACT:No Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personnel Impact. The funding for the Transportation Master Plan, a 2 % year project, has already been allocated and approved in the budget by Council. This particular contract is for an amount not to exceed $60,000.00. BACKGROUND: The TMP will provide an update/rewrite of the 1984 City of Kent Comprehensive Transportation Plan In response to population increases and traffic congestion, changes to land use designations, annexations, new east/west corridors, and major downtown revitalization projects, the Transportation Master Plan is in need of a thorough review and major revisions Phase 1 will expand upon the Transportation Element of the 2004 Comprehensive Plan, identify the transportation system needs to implement the adopted land use plan through 2030, and develop funding strategies necessary to support those future needs including a complete revision of the Coneurrency Management Ordinance iThe Non-Motorized Element of the Transportation Master Plan will examine the City's compliance with current ADA standards, the bicycle network and the pedestrian network These three transportation systems will be inventoried, enhancements will be ranked and costs will be estimated. Then prioritized plans will be submitted to council for systematically improving all three of these networks. • KENCN W q.�.III NGTCN CONSULTANT_ SERVICES AGREEMENT - between the City of Kent and lThe Transpo Group, Inc. THIS AGREEMENT is made between the City of Kent, a Washington municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City"), and The Transpo Group, Inc. organized under the laws of the State of Washington, located and doing business at 11730 118°i Avenue, NE, Suite 600, Kirkland, Washington, 98034 (hereinafter the "Consultant"). I. DESCRIPTION OF WORK. Consultant shall perform the following services for the City in accordance with the following described plans and/or specifications as outlined in Exhibit A (scope of work tasks are numbered consistent with Kent Transportation Master Plan, for that section describing the Kent Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan): Consultant further represents that the services furnished under this Agreement will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices in effect at the time those services are performed. II. TIME OF COMPLETION. The parties agree that work will begin on the tasks described in Section I above immediately upon the effective date of this Agreement. Upon the effective date of this Agreement, Consultant shall complete the work described in Section I within ten (10 months) of the Notice to Proceed. III. COMPENSATION. A. The City shall pay the Consultant, based on time and materials, an amount not to exceed $60,000 (sixty thousand dollars) for the services described in this Agreement. This is the maximum amount to be paid under this Agreement for the work described in Section I above, and shall not be exceeded without the prior written authorization of the City in the form of a negotiated and executed supplemental agreement The Consultant agrees that the hourly or flat rate charged by it for its services contracted for herein shall remain locked at the negotiated rate(s) for a period of one (1) year from the effective date of this Agreement. The Consultant's billing rates shall be as delineated in Exhibit B B. The Consultant shall submit monthly payment invoices to the City for work performed, and a final bill upon completion of all services described in this Agreement. The City shall provide payment within forty-five (45) days of receipt of an invoice. If the City objects to all or any portion of an invoice, it shall notify the Consultant and reserves the option to only pay that portion of the invoice not in dispute. In that event, the parties will immediately make every effort to settle the disputed portion IV. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The parties intend that an Independent Contractor- Employer Relationship will be created by this Agreement and that the Consultant has the ability to control and CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT- 1 (Over$10,000) i direct the performance and details of its work, the City being interested only in the results obtained under this Agreement V. TERMINATION. Either party may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, upon providing the other party thirty (30) days written notice at its address set forth on the signature block of this Agreement After termination, the City may take possession of all records and data within the Consultant's possession pertaining to this project, which may be used by the City without restriction. If the City's use of Consultant's records or data is not related to this project, it shall be without liability or legal exposure to the Consultant. VI. DISCRIMINATION. In the hiring of employees for the performance of work under this Agreement or any subcontract, the Consultant, its subcontractors, or any person acting on behalf of the Consultant or subcontractor shall not, by reason of race, religion, color, sex, age, sexual orientation, national origin, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability, discriminate against any person who is qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates. Consultant shall execute the attached City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Policy Declaration, Comply with City Administrative Policy 1.2, and upon completion of the contract work, file the attached Compliance Statement VII. INDEMNIFICATION. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the Consultant's performance of this Agreement, except for that portion of the injuries and damages caused by the City's negligence. The City's inspection or acceptance of any of Consultant's work when completed shall not be grounds to void any of these covenants of indemnification Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24 115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers, the Consultant's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence. IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE INDEMNIFICATION PROVIDED HEREIN CONSTITUTES THE CONSULTANT'S WAIVER OF IMMUNITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE, TITLE 51 RCW, SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS INDEMNIFICATION. THE PARTIES FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE }MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED THIS WAIVER. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. VIII. INSURANCE. The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, nsurance of the types and in the amounts described in Exhibit C attached and incorporated by this reference IX. EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION. The City will provide its best efforts to provide i reasonable accuracy of any information supplied by it to Consultant for the purpose of completion of the work under this Agreement. Consultant will rely on this information and will not be held liable for any inaccuracies in the information supplied by the City. X. OWNERSHIP AND USE OF RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS. Original final documents, awings, designs, reports, and any other records developed or created under this Agreement shal I belong to and CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT-2 (Over S10,000) become the property of the City. All records submitted by the City to the Consultant will be safeguarded by the Consultant. Consultant shall make such data, documents, and files available to the City upon the City's request. The city's use or reuse of any of the documents, data and files created by Consultant for this project by anyone other than Consultant on any other project shall be without liability or legal exposure to Consultant. XI. CITY'S RIGHT OF INSPECTION. Even though Consultant is an independent contractor with the authority to control and direct the performance and details of the work authorized under this Agreement, the work must meet the approval of the City and shall be subject to the City's general right of inspection to secure satisfactory completion XII. WORK PERFORMED AT CONSULTANT'S RISK. Consultant shall take all necessary precautions and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and subcontractors in the performance of the contract work and shall utilize all protection uccessary for that purpose All work shall be done at Consultant's own nsk, and Consultant shall be responsible for any loss of or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in connection with the work. XIII. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. A. Recyclable Materials. Pursuant to Chapter 3.80 of the Kent City Code, the City requires its contractors and consultants to use recycled and recyclable products whenever practicable. A price preference may be available for any designated recycled product. B. Non-Waiver of Breach. The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, or to exercise any option conferred by this Agreement in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of those covenants, agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect. C. Resolution of Disputes and Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. If the parties are unable to settle any dispute, difference or claim arising from the parties' performance of this Agreement, the exclusive means of resolving that dispute, difference or claim, shall only be by mediation. and if mediation is not successful by filing suit exclusively under the venue, rules and jurisdiction of the King County Superior Court, King County, Washington, unless the parties agree in writing to an alternative dispute resolution process In any claim or lawsuit for damages arising from the parties' performance of this Agreement, each party shall pay all its legal costs and attorney's fees incurred in defending or bringing such claim or lawsuit, in addition to any other recovery or award provided by law; provided, however, nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit the City's right to indemnification under Section VII of this Agreement. D. Written Notice. All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the parties at the addresses listed on the signature page of the Agreement, unless notified to the contrary Any written notice hereunder shall become effective three (3) business days after the date of mailing by registered or certified mail, and shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing. E. Assignment. Any assignment of this Agreement by either party without the written consent of the non-assigning party shall be void If the non-assigning party gives its consent to any assignment, the terms of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and no further assignment shall be made without additional written consent. r CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT-3 (Over S10,000) F. Modification No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions of this Agreement sha11 be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the City and Consultant. G. Entire Agreement. The written provisions and terms of this Agreement, together with any Exhibits attached hereto, shall supersede all prior verbal statements of any officer or other representative of the City, and such statements shall not be effective or be construed as entering into or forming a part of or altering in any manner this Agreement. All of the above documents are hereby made a part of this Agreement. However, should any language in any of the Exhibits to this Agreement conflict with any language contained in lthis Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. H. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant agrees to comply with all federal, state, and municipal laws, rules, and regulations that are now effective or in the future become applicable to Consultant's business, equipment, and personnel engaged in operations covered by this Agreement or accruing out of the performance of those operations IN WITNESS, the parties below execute this Agreement, which shall become effective on the last date entered below. CONSULTANT: CITY OF KENT: 1 By: By- (signature) (signature) Print Name: Print Name: Jim White Its Its Mayor (Title) (Tide) DATE: DATE- NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: CONSULTANT: CITY OF KENT: Bruce Haldors, President [Insert Name of City Rep. to Receive Notice] The Transpo Group, Inc. City of Kent 11730 118`h Avenue NE, Suite 600 220 Fourth Avenue South Kirkland, Washington 98034 Kent, WA 98032 (425) 821-3665 (telephone) (253) [Insert Phone Number] (telephone) 425 825-8434 (facsimile) (253) [Insert Fax Number] (facsimile) APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kent Law Department ONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT-4 (Over$10,000) EXHIBT A The Transpo Group, Inc. Scope of Work—Kent Pedestrian-Bicycle Transportation Plan Task 2B: City of Kent Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan The purpose of this task is to identify and inventory the existing pedestrian and bicycle system within the City of Kent, develop a GIS database, and conduct spatial analyses to identify priority pedestrian and bicycle improvements. Planning-level cost estimates will be integrated, and the spatial analyses and prioritized improvements will consider accessibility to public transit, schools, parks, civic centers and other critical factors. A Draft Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan will be coordinated with the other modal element and financial planning efforts. A Final Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan will reflect this coordination, and include design guidelines for effective Plan implementation. 2B.1 Review and Summarize Existing Data, Plans Policies and Standards jThe Consultant will assemble and review the following information related to non-motorized activities: o City of Kent GIS data— street, pedestrian and bicycle system o City of Kent transportation plans, policies and standards 1 o City of Kent bicycle facilities inventory o State & Federal policies and standards (WSDOT Pedestrian Facilities Guidebook & American's With Disabilities Act (ADA) / FHWA Designing Sidewalks and Trails for Access) o Public transportation plans, policies and standards (Sound Transit and Metro Transit) o Miscellaneous local plans and programs, including such things as hazardous sidewalks, safe- route-to-school plans, neighborhood plans, and priority transit system connections, central city plans, etc 2B.2 Define Pedestrian and Bicycle System Inventory and Database Needs The Consultant will coordinate with City Staff to define the pedestrian and bicycle inventory needs, including the following• o Identify and confirm with City Staff a preliminary set of evaluation criteria that will be used to develop the inventory program o Appropriate GIS and database structure and format for consistency with other city programs (e.g. pavement management), making use of already completed inventory o Standardized inventory grading system and equipment (assuming use of Trimble GEOXT, hand- held GPS units with Terrasync software supporting Pathfinder Office-based data collection routines o Elements to be inventoried, including such items as location of sidewalks, crosswalks, signalized intersections, ADA standard and substandard curb cuts and pedestrian/wheeIchair obstacles (e g. CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT-5 (Over$10,000) sign boards, utility poles, tree root heaving, vegetation, etc), additional bicycle system information (as identified in Task 2B.1), shared-use paths, bus stops and amenities, rail stations and amenities o Inventory staffing needs and coordination protocol (it is assumed that the Consultant will hire temporary staff to complete the GPS inventory of Kent's bicycle and pedestrian system) �2B.3 Conduct Kent Pedestrian and Bicycle System Inventory The Consultant will undertake an inventory of pedestrian and bicycle systems, including the following• o Develop database entry forms for field reconnaissance, inventory and grading of Kent pedestrian and bicycle system. o Coordinate and train inventory staff o Conduct inventory of Kent pedestrian and bicycle system, including data quality review and control. o Summarize and review inventory and identify data gaps or errors and conduct additional inventory (if needed) o Summarize database statistics (miles of sidewalk by grade level, number of ADA compliant ramps, number of intersections and/or length of streets lacking sidewalks and/or ADA ramps, number and length of bicycle lanes and shared-use paths, etc.) and prepare GIS map summaries o Prepare technical memorandum for Kent Staff distribution and review. The technical memorandum will be formatted to also serve as Kent's Self-Evaluation, intended to meet those applicable requirements of the ADA 2B.4 Identify Priority Improvements and Their Cost The Consultant will recommend a set of non-motorized improvements, including cost estimates and listing of priorities by major category of improvement. The consultant will: l� o Identify sidewalk, intersection curbing and ADA ramps and curb cut improvements needs for the entire Kent street network o Identify those pedestrian and bicycle improvements that are already assumed in other City, state or regional plans (mainly Kent's CIP and FYWP). o Coordinate with Kent Staff and determine appropriate planning-level unit costs for pedestrian and bicycle system improvements based on recent project experience. o Integrate cost measures in pedestrian and bicycle GIS database and estimate system improvements costs. o Identify measurable accessibility indices based on available and appropriate GIS data (e.g schools, street functional classification, bus routes, & stops, transit stations, parks, civic centers) o Develop GIS evaluation criteria and weighting factors to apply to accessibility indices o Quantify and summarize pedestrian and bicycle improvement priorities based on GIS accessibility indices and weighting factors, and evaluation criteria ONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT-b Over$10.000) o Confirm existing and identify new school walk routes as a portion of the pedestrian system priorities o Prepare GIS mapping summaries of pedestrian and bicycle system priority improvements The level of effort in this task assumes a single identification and summary of'prolect priorities based on the evaluation criteria and weighting measures established with City Staff input. Additional refinement to the criteria, weighting measures and re-calculation of priorities will be considered"Additional Services" to this Agreement. 2B.5 Develop Draft and Final Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan The Consultant will: o Develop draft and final pedestrian and bicycle system improvement priority lists and maps, including their general timing (quartiles over 20-year period and a"20+years" time frame) and planning-level cost estimates o Develop design guidelines and recommended policies relating to pedestrian and bicycle system enhancements and ADA compliance I o Documentation of Pedestrian and Bicycle plan consistent with Kent Transportation Plan, and in a format that also serves as Kent's ADA Transition Plan 2B.6 Coordinate Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan Development The Consultant will prepare for and attend: o Bi-Monthly Team teleconference meetings (assuming 24 over 12 months) o Team (Consultants & City Staff) meetings—Five Summary of Data, Plans & Policies (Task 2B.1) ✓ Inventory & Database Needs (Task 213.2) ✓ Summary of Inventory—Key Travel Patterns and Corridors, Gaps (Task 213.3) ✓ Draft Priority Improvements (Task 2B 4) ✓ Draft Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan (Task 2B.5) O Neighborhood/Co inm unity/Stakeholder (Bicycle) Groups—Two Meetings; both information sharing on inventory of system and Draft Plan findings o AD-Hoc Advisory Committee—Two Meetings, one to consider inventory and evaluation criteria, the second to consider Draft Plan findings o City Council—One Meeting to consider Draft Plan findings Deliverables: • Technical Memoranda in summary of each Subtask (four) • Project meetings (nine) in coordination of Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan process, findings and recommendations CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT-7 (Over$'10,000) • Draft and Final Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan documentation • GIS database of Pedestrian and Bicycle Inventory, Planning-Level Costs and Priorities ONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT-8 (Over$10,000) Exhibit B Last Updated C7 2,,"rS 2006AdJustmentinJuly Percentage of Kent Averaged Rate AdJustenetFactor 1.04 Project Completed as Transpo Rates as of July,2005 of July 1 2006 Kent Ped-Bike Plan Prior to Alter Initials Job Title I BilOn Rate Ratelncrease. 4% 75% 25% LWT Pnn $180 $187 135 4675 $182 KGG Prin $180 $187 135 4675 5182 HFC Prin $180 $187 135 4675 $182 BRH Prin $180 $187 135 4675 $182 WDG Sen Eng III $170 $177 127 5 4425 $172 JHL Sen Plnr III $160 $166 120 41 5 $162 AIM Sen Plnr III $155 $161 11625 4025 $157 RPD Sen Analy II $155 $161 11625 40 25 $157 TLA Sen Eng II $145 $151 10875 3775 $147 MGL Sen Plnr II $140 $146 105 365 $142 KLI Sen Eng If $140 $146 105 365 $142 KSF Sen Eng II $140 $146 105 365 $142 JCL Contr $135 $140 10125 35 $136 YRG Sen Anly II $130 $135 97 5 33 75 $131 DGM Sen Plnr I $130 $135 97 5 33 75 $131 MJS Sen Eng I $130 $135 97 5 33 75 $131 EMA Sen Eng I $130 $135 97 5 3375 $131 KRC Sen Eng I $125 $130 9375 325 $126 JCP Sen Eng I $125 $130 9375 325 $126 FL Sen Eng I $126 $131 945 3275 $127 RSG Sen Analy I $115 S120 8625 30 $116 PBL Sen PlnrI $115 $120 8625 30 $116 DWS Sr PA I $115 $120 8625 30 $116 LCK Sr PA I 115 $120 8625 30 $116 JEAW Eng III $105 $109 7875 2725 $106 LEV Eng III $100 $104 75 26 $101 KKS Eng III $100 $104 75 26 $101 SR Plnr II $95 $99 7125 2475 $96 BW Eng II $95 $99 7125 2475 $96 BIM Plnr 11 $95 $99 71 25 2475 $96 MJES Eng II $85 $88 6375 22 $86 LDK CAD $85 $88 6375 22 $86 RFM PA II $85 $88 6375 22 $86 DCG PA II $85 $88 6375 22 $86 JRS PA II $85 $88 6375 22 $86 IMP Eng I $80 $83 60 2075 $81 JLB Eng I $80 $83 60 2075 $81 JBB Eng1 $80 $83 60 2075 $81 SEL Eng1 $80 $83 60 2075 $81 BTW Eng I $80 $83 60 2075 $81 TRK Analy I $80 $83 60 20 75 $81 LMR PA I $60 $62 45 15 5 $61 CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT-9 (Over S10,000) Exhibit C — Statement of Insurance The Consultant shall secure regular Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance coverage in an amount not less than a single limit of$1,000,000 for bodily injury including death and property damage per occurrence, and Professional Liability Insurance in an amount of not less than $1,000,000 from an insurance company authorized to do business in the State of Washington. 1 i t 1 1 1 I ONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT- 10 (Over S10,000) DECLARATION CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY The City of Kent is committed to conform to Federal and State laws regarding equal opportunity. As such all contractors, subcontractors and suppliers who perform work with relation to this Agreement shall comply with the regulations of the City's equal employment opportunity policies The following questions specifically identify the requirements the City deems necessary for any contractor, subcontractor or supplier on this specific Agreement to adhere to. An affirmative response is required on all of the following questions for this Agreement to be valid and binding If any contractor, subcontractor or supplier willfully misrepresents themselves with regard to the directives outlines, it will be considered a breach of contract and it will be at the City's sole determination regarding suspension or termination for all or part of the Agreement, The questions are as follows: 1. I have read the attached City of Kent administrative policy number 1.2. 2. During the time of this Agreement I will not discriminate in employment on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, age, or the presence of all sensory, mental or physical disability. 3. During the time of this Agreement the prime contractor will provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer. 4. During the time of the Agreement I, the prime contractor, will actively consider hiring and promotion of women and minorities. 5. Before acceptance of this Agreement, an adherence statement will be signed by me, the Prime Contractor, that the Prime Contractor complied with the requirements as set forth above. By signing below, I agree to fulfill the five requirements referenced above. Dated this day of 200_. By. For: ITitle. Date: EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS- l CITY OF KENT ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY NUMBER: 1.2 EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 1998 SUBJECT. MINORITY AND WOMEN SUPERSEDES- April 1, 1996 CONTRACTORS APPROVED BY Jim White, Mayor OLICY: Equal employment opportunity requirements for the City of Kent will conform to federal and state laws. All i contractors, subcontractors, consultants and suppliers of the City must guarantee equal employment opportunity Within their organization and, if holding Agreements with the City amounting to $10,000 or more within any given year, must take the following affirmative steps: 1. Provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal l opportunity employer. 2. Actively consider for promotion and advancement available minorities and women. y contractor, subcontractor, consultant or supplier who willfully disregards the City's nondiscrimination and qual opportunity requirements shall be considered in breach of contract and subject to suspension or termination for all or part of the Agreement. Contract Compliance Officers will be appointed by the Directors of Planning, Parks, and Public Works Departments to assume the following duties for their respective departments. 1. Ensuring that contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and suppliers subject to these regulations are familiar with the regulations and the City's equal employment opportunity policy 2. Monitoring to assure adherence to federal, state and local laws, policies and guidelines. EO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS-2 CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMPLIANCE STATEMENT This form shall be filled out AFTER COMPLETION of this project by the Contractor awarded the Agreement. I, the undersigned, a duly represented agent of Company, hereby acknowledge and declare that the before-mentioned company was the prime contractor for the Agreement known as that was entered into on the (date) , between the firm I represent and the City of Kent. I declare that I complied fully with all of the requirements and obligations as outlined in the City of Kent Administrative Policy 1.2 and the Declaration City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Policy that was part of the before-mentioned Agreement. Dated this day of 1200 ._ By: For: Title: Date: EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS-3 Kent City Council Meeting Date_December 13, 2005 Category Consent Calendar I. SUBJECT: TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN CH2M HILL CONTRACT— AUTHORIZE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorize the Mayor to sign the Consultant Services Agreement between the City and CH2M Hill for Public Outreach/Public Involvement efforts in support of the Transportation Master Plan, Phase 1. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director's memorandum 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? Yes Revenue? N/A Currently In the Budget? Yes X No If no: Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund Amount $ 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Counctlmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6AA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Larry R. Blanchard, Public Works Director Phone 253-856-5500 Fax 253-856-6500 K E N T WASHINGTON Address 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent,WA 98032-5895 DATE: December 5, 2005 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Steve Mullen, Transportation Engineering Manager THROUGH: Larry Blanchard, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Transportation Master Plan (TMP)—Consultant Contract 1 MOTION: Recommend the Council Authorize the Mayor to sign the Consultant Services Agreement between the City of Kent and CH2M HILL for Public Outreach/Public j Involvement efforts in support of the Transportation Master Plan, Phase 1 For a detailed description of the tasks to be performed, see the Scope of Work which is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference. SUMMARY: Consultant services are needed to provide project support materials, language translation services, web site support, video scripts, newsletters, fliers, identify stakeholder groups, set up and facilitate meetings with interested parties and provide summaries of stakeholder interviews/meetings BUDGET IMPACT:No Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personnel Impact. The funding for the Transportation Master Plan, a 2 '/z year project, has already been allocated and approved in the budget by Council. This particular agreement is for an amount not to exceed$91,000.00. BACKGROUND: The TMP will provide an update/rewnte of the 1984 City of Kent Comprehensive Transportation Plan In response to population increases and traffic congestion, changes to land use designations, annexations, new east/west comdors, and major downtown revitalization projects, the Transportation Master Plan is in need of a thorough review and major revisions. Phase I will expand upon the Transportation Element of the 2004 Comprehensive Plan, identify the transportation system needs to implement the adopted land use plan through 2030, and develop funding strategies necessary to support those future needs including a complete revision of the Concurrency Management Ordinance The Public Involvement task is to engage the public in determining and prioritizing transportation issues for all modes of transportation and to provide opportunity for the public to be actively involved in identifying solutions that best serve Kent's community vision and needs. Exhibit A- CH2M HILL Scope of Work November 29, 2005 For the following Scope of Work, CONSULTANT is equivalent to CH2M HILL Staff and PRIME is equivalent to Mirai Associates. Task 0: Project Management-CO\�S�L�P\��a�c`aC��y\each CONSULTANT's project manager will attend m-person three(3) monthly meetings with the City project manager and six (6)bi-weekly scheduled conference call meetings. Team Kick-off Meeting CONSULTANT will plan, lead and participate in a project kick-off meeting with City of Kent project management team to determine project success measures, confirm project background and critical path items, and achieve a collective understand about the anticipated project results. The meeting will also establish common goals and objectives regarding public participation Deliverables• 10 Monthly progress reports and invoices; schedule updates and facilitation of the Kick-off meeting. Task 8: Public Involvement- The purpose of this task is to engage the public in determining and prioritizing transportation issues for all modes of transportation and to provide opportunity to be actively involved in identifying transportation solutions that best serve the City of Kent's community vision and particular transportation needs It is envisioned that this scope will provide the flexibility to mix and match outreach services to best serve the transportation master planning process as it unfolds. Stakeholder Interviews—Stakeholder Involvement Plan The CONSULTANT will interview up to 10 stakeholders as identified by City Staff. It is assumed that up to 6 of the interviews will be with individuals and up to 4 interviews will be with small groups of interested parties. The purpose of the interviews will be to accumulate detailed information about issues and expectations concerning the Transportation Master Plan Exhibit A- Scope of Work 1 and explore the most effective methods of reaching out to the constituency they represent. This task will result in a Summary of Findings and recommendations for stakeholder involvement, including input to the need for non-English speaking translation services. Summaries of each interview will be attached to the Summary of Findings as supporting documentation. Understanding that the City and PRIME would like to participate in the interviews, CONSULTANT will provide two (2) facilitators for four(4) of the meetings and one (1) for the remaining six (6) interviews to reduce the number of individuals at interviews. Deliverables: , Summary notes for each interview Draft and final Public Outreach Plan. Ad-Hoc Advisory Committee CONSULTANT will work with City Staff and PRIME to develop the list of potential Ad-Hoc Advisory Committee members (e.g. representatives from the local school district, transit, developers, downtown, cultural groups, veteran's groups, seniors, minorities and effected agencies) to be appointed by the City Council The CONSULTANT will make initial contacts with the potential members and report findings to the City. CONSULTANT will deliver up to three interactive presentations to the Ad-Hoc Advisory ' Committee,It is anticipated that the meetings will be scheduled in coordination with key project milestones to be determined during development of the study schedule. CONSULTANT will lead the Ad-Hoc Committee through a project visioning exercise at the first of these meetings. This exercise will assist in establishing and understanding clear success measures and the range of project objectives from the community's perspective From this point on, it is anticipated that the presentations will be informal show-and-tell with opportunities for feedback from the Ad- Hoc Committee Committee protocols will be established at the first meeting to clarify meeting ground rules and the roles and responsibilities of committee members. It is expected that this group will serve as ambassadors for the project. The CONSULTANT will coordinate with PRIME to prepare a draft agenda for the three meetings City staff will send out the agenda and arrange for a meeting location for each meeting. Deliverables. Three facilitated meetings (assumes City and PRIME jointly take minutes) Exhibit A- Scope of Work 2 Overall Summary of Public Involvement Process CONSULTANT will provide a brief summary of activities conducted during the transportation master plan and common themes received during the process and to be inserted into the Master Plan. Outreach Collateral Materials Video Script: CONSULTANT will work with City Staff to review video clippings and available resources inside Kent for video production. It is assumed the t_;ity and CONSULTANT will jointly develop the key messages that the video should convey CONSULTANT will provide a 10-minute script for the Mayor. This video will be used for broadcast on local cable network television. Newsletters- CONSULTANT will work with City to communicate key planning steps and methods for citizen participation and input into easy-to-understand, graphically friendly newsletters. It is assumed that CONSULTANT will provide a camera ready version of the newsletter to the City for production and mailing to City of Kent property owners and residents. City may chose to apply translation services (see below) for up to two non-English languages for each newsletter. ' Web Site Support: All materials and graphics will be provided in formats suitable for uploading onto the City's Web site. CONSULTANT will provide two pages of graphic layout, structure and key links for subsequent Web-page development as it relates to the Transportation Master Plan development. Web Master assistance will be available on a cost and material basis as needed for up to a total of 150 hours of graphics and coordination time. Project Support Materials- This task is a flexible task, where City can request one-page fact sheets, project posters and/or PowerPoint presentation to support the Transportation Master Plan process and presentations to the Public Works Department and the City Council. This task is jbudgeted for 150 hours of graphics and coordination time. Language Translation Services: This task will be used as deemed necessary to include a translator as necessary at meetings or to translate newsletter products. (S.50/word per language - assume 2000words= approximately S 1000/language per newsletter) Deliverables • One 10-minute video script for City of Kent Mayor • Three Draft and Final, camera-ready project newsletters • Miscellaneous supporting materials for up to t50 hours of graphics time • Two-page Web graphics (all project related graphics will be provided in a format suitable for the web) Exhibit A- Scope of Work 3 Kent City Council Meeting December 13,2005 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT AGREEMENT —AUTHORIZE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorize the Mayor to sign the Highline Water District Agreement upon concurrence of the language in that Agreement by the City Attorney and the Public Works Director. l I 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director's memorandum 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure" N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes No If no: Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue. Fund Amount $ 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda 1 Item No. 6BB PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Larry R. Blanchard, Public Works Director Phone 253-856-5500 r Fax 253-856- 500 KENT WASHINOTON Address 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent,WA 98032-5895 DATE: December 5, 2005 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Larry Blanchard, Public Works Director SUBJECT: City of Kent and Highline Water District Agreement for Establishment of Water Service Area MOTION. Recommend Council authorize the Mayor to sign the City of Kent and Highline Water District Interlocal Agreement for establishment of water service areas SUMMARY: This Interlocal agreement is to memorialize the request by the City to revise the 1999 Agreement for Amendment of service area to incorporate those areas that currently can be served by Kent The revision to this agreement more clearly identifies those areas that can be served by the City of Kent and those areas that can be served by Highline Water District. BUDGET IMPACT: No Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personnel Impact BACKGROUND: In 1999 the City of Kent and Highline Water District entered into an agreement to determine the service area of each jurisdiction to the Kentview PUD (Polygon Development) The service area was based on each jurisdictions ability to provide sufficient water supply to this area. Also, errors were made in the original description of this service area and a revised agreement would give us the opportunity to correct this error. The revisions to this original water service agreement more clearly describes each jurisdictions capable water service area and consequently places more Kent citizens with the Kentview Development (Polygon) inside of Kent's Water Service area. No major adjustments will need to be made to either jurisdictions operational procedures to provide for this transition of service CITY OF KENT AND HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF WATER SERVICE AREA BEai}NI3�lt?Ilf �'='=- THIS AGREEMENT ("AGREEMENT") is entered into between the CITY OF KENT, a Washington municipal corporation ("City") and HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT, a Washington municipal corporation ("District"), both being duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Washington (individually a "Party" and collectively the "Parties"), RECITALS Both the City and the District are public agencies authorized by law and qualified to engage in furnishing water service within their prescribed areas; and It is in the public interest for the Parties to enter into an agreement to provide for the efficient planning and development for water service in areas that may be served by either, or both, of the Parties; and In 1999 the Parties entered into an "Agreement for Amendment to Service Area" (the "1999 Agreement") relating to a project known as the Kentview PUD ("Project") located west of and adjacent to the Green River to remove the Project area from the City's water service area and to include the Project area in the District's water service area; and The City has requested that a portion of the Project area be removed from the District's water service area and included in the City's water service area; the District has also requested that an additional portion of the Project area be included in the District's water service area and the Parties now desire to amend the 1999 Agreement to modify the water service area boundary between the Parties involving the Project area; and Determining future service area boundaries between the City and the District will provide for maximum efficient use of existing and future facilities and orderly and efficient water system planning; and Pursuant to Chapter 70.116, the Public Water System Coordination Act, the Parties determined and agreed upon the water service areas between the Parties as set forth in the South King County Coordinated Water System Plan and the Parties now desire to modify their water service areas as provided in this Agreement; and The City and the District have the legal authority to cooperate with other municipalities on the basis of mutual advantage and efficient provision of municipal services pursuant to Chapter 39.34,the tnterlocal Cooperation Act. KENTIHIGHLINE BOUNDARY INTERLOCAL -1- NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City and the District agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Purpose. The purpose of this agreement is to expand a portion of the District's water service area into the City's existing water service area, to reduce and relinquish a portion of the District's water service area to the City and to express attendant rights and obligations, in order to better serve planned land use development in the City of Kent and to allow the District to better plan the provision of water service within its service area. 2. Duration. This agreement shall take effect on the last date approved by both the Kent City Council and the District Commissioners and shall remain in effect until modified by mutual written agreement of the Parties. 3. Water Service Areas. The District's current service area in the area affected by this Agreement is depicted on the map attached as Exhibit "A". The Parties agree that their water service area boundaries shall be modified in accordance with the service area boundaries shown on Exhibit "B" and legally described in Exhibit "C". The City shall provide water service in those areas shown on Exhibit `B" as "City of Kent Water Service Area", and the District shall provide water service to those areas shown on Exhibit `B" and legally described in Exhibit "C" as "Highline Water District Water Service Area". Each Party shall have the sole responsibility and authority to construct, maintain, manage, conduct and operate their water systems within their water service areas as agreed to in this Agreement, together with any additions, extensions and betterments thereto. The 1999 Agreement and the South King County Coordinated Water System Plan are hereby modified and amended to be consistent with the Parties' water service area boundaries in the Project area set forth on Exhibits "B" and "C" attached hereto. 4. City Jurisdictional Rights. Both parties acknowledge the water service areas for the City and the District, are as shown and described on Exhibits `B" and "C". Both parties acknowledge that the City may exercise all its other jurisdictional rights over District territory within city limits to which the City will not provide water service. 5. Future Annexations. Each Party may provide water service to the areas shown and described on Exhibits `B" and "C" without regard to the present corporate limits of the Parties, and without regard to future corporate limits as they may be amended by annexations. 6. District Comprehensive Plan. The service areas and attendant rights and obligations in this Agreement will be included as an amendment to the District's comprehensive plan. The District will submit to the City all comprehensive plans and amendments involving area and/or system improvements within the City's planning area or corporate boundaries. KENT/HIGHLINE BOUNDARY INTERLOCAL -2- 7. City Comprehensive Plan. The service areas and attendant rights and obligations in this agreement will be included in the City's comprehensive water system =plan and amendments thereto. �c 8. Reliance. Each Party acknowledges that it will rely upon this agreement to meet the needs of the designated service areas as follows: comprehensive planning; commitments to provide water service; bonding or other financing; and timing, location, and construction of capital facilities. 9. Governmental Approvals. The Parties will give notice of the adoption of this Agreement, as required, to King County, to the Department of Ecology, to the Department of Health, and to any other agency with jurisdiction. Further, each Party will cooperate and assist in good faith to procure any necessary approvals by those agencies. 10. Boundary Review Board. In the event that implementation of this Agreement results in pennanent water service to areas that will be outside the boundaries of the City or the District,the Parties will at the time of that service jointly seek approval of the King County Boundary Review Board, if required, in accordance with RCW 36.93.090. 11. Service Amendments. Any changes to the service areas described herein shall be by mutual written agreement only, however, each Party may give staff level permission to the other on a case-by-case basis to provide service by one Party into the other Party's adjacent or nearby service area based upon considerations of efficiency and economy in providing that service. 12. Sanctity of Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the Parties regarding the subject matter hereof, and there are no other representations or oral agreements other than those listed herein, which vary the terms of this Agreement. Future agreements may occur between the Parties to transfer additional, or future service areas by mutual agreement. 13. Obligations Intact. Nothing herein shall be construed to alter the rights, responsibilities, liabilities, or obligations of either the City or the District regarding provision of water service, except as specifically set forth in this Agreement. Specifically, and without limitation, this Agreement shall not be construed as a contract that would hmit the City's ability to assume all or part of the District under RCW 35.13A.070. 14. Miscellaneous. A. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. If any dispute arises between the City and the District under any of the provisions of this agreement, resolution of that dispute shall be available only through the jurisdiction, venue and rules of the King County Superior Court, King County, Washington. KENTMIGHLINE BOUNDARY INTERLOCAL -3- B. Attorneys' Fees. In any claim or lawsuit for damages arising from the Parties' performance of this agreement, each Party shall be responsible for payment of its own legal costs and attorney's fees incurred in defending or bringing such claim or lawsuit. C. Assignment. Any assignment of this Agreement by either Party without the written consent of the other Party shall be void. E. Modification. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the City and the District. F. Severability. If any one or more sections, sub-sections, or sentences of this Agreement are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, that decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this agreement and the remainder shall remain in full force and effect. G. Entire Agreement. The written provisions and terms of this Agreement, together with any attached Exhibits, supersede all prior verbal statements by any representative of the City and the District, and those statements shall not be construed as fonning a part of or altering in any manner this Agreement. This Agreement and any attached Exhibits contain the entire agreement between the Parties. Should any language in any Exhibit to this Agreement conflict with any language contained in this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. 15. Effective Date. This Agreement will take effect on the last date signed below. APPROVED BY Motion of the City Council of the CITY OF KENT, Washington, at is regular meeting held on the day of , 2005. CITY OF KENT: By: JIM WHITE, MAYOR Date: ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK i t KENTMIGHLINE BOUNDARY INTERLOCAL -4- APPROVED BY RESOLUTION No.oc,-�j-��t3of the Board of Commissions of MGHLINE WATER DISTRICT of King County, Washington, adopted at its regular meeting held on the IlvPh day of N0ye vv-�bei/ , 2005. - HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT By: ► ZIP EA-e c Its: -?e'4A --A't f , ln,..�-a Date: / 2 o 5 By: Its: Date: P XC, 1IT1LFS\OpenFilm\0%81WaterServtceAresimed c I DRAFT 102005 doc VENT/HIGHLINE BOUNDARY INTERLOCAL -S- HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION 05-11-16B RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF HIGHLINE WATER 1 DISTRICT, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, APPROVING AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF WATER SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES WITH THE CITY OF KENT. 1 WHEREAS, pursuant to Title 57 RCW, the Highline Water District ("District") provides water service to an area in King County known as Highline; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Title 35 RCW, the City of Kent ("City") provides water service to areas within and without the City; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 70.116, the Public Water System Coordination Act, the District, the City and other water purveyors previously determined and agreed upon the water service areas between the parties as set forth in the South King County Coordinated Water System Plan, and WHEREAS, in 1999 the District and the City entered into an "Agreement for Amendment to Service Area" (the "1999 Agreement") relating to a project known as the Kentview PUD ("Project") located west of and adjacent to the Green River to remove the Project area from the City's water service area and to include the Project area in the District's water service area; and WHEREAS, the City has requested that a portion of the Project area be removed from the District's water service area and included in the City's water service area; the District has also requested that an additional portion of the Project area be included in the District's water service area and the Parties now desire to amend the 1999 Agreement to modify the water service area boundary between the Parties involving the Project area; and WHEREAS, determining future service area boundaries between the City and the District will provide for maximum efficient use of existing and future facilities and orderly and efficient water system planning; and a WHEREAS, the City and the District have the legal authority to cooperate with other municipalities on the basis of mutual advantage and efficient provision of municipal services pursuant to Chapter 39 34, the Interlocal Cooperation Act; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Commissioners of Highline Water District, King County, Washington, as follows 1. The "Interlocal Agreement for Establishment of Water Service Area Boundaries" Commissioners is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Agreement on behalf of the District. 2. District staff are hereby authorized and directed to carry out and perform the terms and conditions of the Agreement. F:\HOME\MARY\ADMIN\2005 RESOLUTIONSM-11-16B Interlocal Agreement HWD-Kent DOC Page 1 of 2 HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ' RESOLUTION 05-11-16B ' ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS of Highline Neater District, King County, Washington, at a Regular Open Public Meeting held this 16th day of November 2005. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS - Randall Tay r, res+dent' '; thleen on -Vermeire, Secretary t erald R. Guite, Co issioner Vince Koester, Commissioner �`. George Landon, Commissioner t ATTEST: ' 1, the undersigned Secretary of the Board of Commissioners of Highline Water District, King County, Washington, do hereby certify that the within and foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. 05-11-16B adopted at a regular open public meeting held this 16th day of November, 2005 athleen Ouong-Vibaineirb, Secretary 1 1 1 F\H01V1E\MARY\ADMIN\2005 RESOLUTIONS\05-11-16B interlocal Agreement HWD-Kent-DOC Page 2 of 2 _ Flown July,2002 _ , _ J..` "_%,"';j'' =a"0_-. spa iv 1,4 ,x '<'n '3d��� E} �•�txl - yi �et;zl ��•�"'�F"'r�y;'� yP.� M�`5�-; `3 F � #"'A*i� ,:•f�°`F�e b'" yr'[, ` 3'h=' _ .*^: >`r� ti_#•T .f- %A e't�'+ i}�t's:_ n'S'�w.y;��z+ �� F` _y�+wi,�. ��,+ r ,�`��� � y=, ���s, ^.�y�+�' r`��'w�.�'- _ i➢^� G _ n_s.,� �,--, s�`'a"'p{. _,s 3�'21 � :�+tf �s.,}''i�'", _ n�ti'_ :a!• '�-.ailr'-:,' =�r-� � �t$"�� �� TN✓'.� l�J_, a±� .�� yy <+iy�w+F ,gd P E ,S31St' i'3w1' .i Kti,.4 =Wi�,.��;+• ;•a I-", �' nr"`� �� ��t 4 'Cs��i-r'x-t 'i�� "�_ 1 - :. ,y^y, f'�,say 'r''fr <, X #• , '�5 �' . 4 1 ,a 411 •1�'_^—r �agF x, a� � ... ��. A ``° *F �" ���'rr""' .��a�x --._ s -.y�="Y.'5rn• .,...e" ' S{k- fir=:. :_€ _ ���xa?`x: dR .dry �' ," e'S'A" 'G;"tcty-'T•��•a-i`,"�s.�TMrc�s_ :x _ T ia$k`'-tO E , �r.y� +1" ; Inc z.`x Z'�!' ^3x zf#.s�"•_S' ''" :� Ifk''-s` - y.., '- ;`.a€°`' > o,nc !.Ye ' _ • _ �"_;5�":�.� .. � �.�a.l ' ?yam vr4� "ry; �YK'. ' 1+ , ,F``"k�' �i '�t>;.i.m_ 8 t;➢ �l > *' ts` -�. �, I z;a•"t" -'x. n r:"�' M-f jFv:' VCy �=s 55• ,..a* "S " 'R.FIt'`w• i , = ,;3�t^ 4 x 4 ''\:i. $ .`' `'w-:." kf vsk xiS,.tri +>,. � �'^ i E�S.ps'YJ-i , u.r'xS`-':•A:�"o-'ti. , 1,i!Nk1F'yt SrAissiW . 3 YY.. T..sM. .. r +ri k l-v'v(� rQi 5•:£ N2' i a,.' 4it"i MWIE R, f P- 2 : y.,,. yy' IT ,. •�.' �� �y �- - ,^�.-' r�, _ ;t`.. >� ems. ,� ram. '.:'^. cr , 'n t Sa'' - .,: ram "a3, E=•a `�-r=�:,' `z; L. - _:}`m E>>;, • _F s3 sy;5 .. ;b:. 'Vv 4.^„s?s� '- :� `-`+r..a+^ a 5y` i ,ri �k-'"< 'ram'` ;'Y'k.#"'•`" bb *_.#cs.��.. _ yi � rMkx. ,- a• a ir.�Saactw'` �sF.:=`.'.- :A� '_>T�"' AT EXISTING W-D. BOUNDARY NEW W.D. BOUNDARY ®®a— ®° 1111 It5;6trH PL_1-..✓ Y � y � _ r rr` [JZr PG'✓✓T "C' new WA TO? � I ", BIXJNBrLPY - i h�aJnrin T. [ nro• (/ \� 1t I o:A^•Ary natal IX7Tmcr WATEf7 OIS777lCr t;�lsli _,n7. � I ly�o�azfl 7f A t / ! "; 1 j,- ti ot+B o,an i I! �e;,,j f 9,^i199i I yi �l� _ Ri 1 3�? TI I f)l1310•P)il n--r /9ihir 1 1!I r 1) ,�nFAl9•:�ir r9 17 qK,l9Ca i 9SW '69 -'wed Sei• ° °,oe,'.m�rn� �ai �1, �'� POINT 6 $9$116rfl ST r r e rV `NEw wA 7FR usri?iCT TRACT TRACT ' J e / —BGCIVOARY 0 6630t A AC - 1 TRACT �' 19647t A IF cr e e n Q�59r ''�°, a A• (FACT "L' p O SOOOf AC / PARCEL TRACT I 3 443111 ' S" , AG T.4C7 �- Ar TV 0&52Ti TRACT AC H" TRACT H'I PAP,CEL F 15 3073t AG I� 68555t 40 TRACT 7N' 43763t A' IIRACT 21377t AC TRACT / I I PARCEL O d1016t AC 771 I ( b 4140 LZ AC Jw� \ TRACT i U-J EVS77N0 WATER I J ' L7.'STR7CT l05131t AC/,1 bowo RY f cox SEC ,n-Z-E { , S 2767H Sr M4CT W TRACT "Y' q _- 0 6880t AC {� , -- zg V q TRAcr J' PGA 29647t A p c,i e 7R CT'T e �QI Q al Bt _ •q — +f o— 1� -+ h 7RACr 2" o b a + m 9'r'"• N 0 5000t AC , 4 i q _ • c�'oti � PARCEL a -� •O IRACT I 8 4432t • �' S' AC. �T AC TR R&S23t 7RACr j V AC h," IRACr K' 1 (� PARCEL ' a8073t AC •R� I i 6.9556.lt AC - , TRACT i{l" 43766t A TRACT N" LJ PARCEL U 310t5t 7- V 424071 AC 'T Q �• W� 4 Oe /� N T.S. TRACT , j I� mmwcT�yM 7L15237t AC. fJ AREA 80EMARY �.t$ .oY iaagi EXHIBIT A PAGE a i EXISTING HIQHUNE WATER DISTRICT 1 OF 2 0 o SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY 14711 NE 29ih Place SoRe t o t A L Low cn Bellevue,Woshngton 4800T 425885.7877 Fax 425 985 7963 E'1affi 10 26 06 DESIGN „• ..man .., s slBssy�t% I maf % I au9 m76 '� r9ra71ot�j � 't !� q J/�•�(�m7s f mm 1Ja•af s=4erH sm�9aee _smarfrsr gars 1 t ft z9 � Y o strD r as slsqgm I /t F a3 ar�,a h 909 9r-0 9� ��(9,M f pp 912f 9f)9 } W96 9,0 6Cbr 9,&S ! araD W. I i��1PD3D. M15 ar 07Yt. W9E!- `•f 7 gf II Im�O-,69I• a3fs�\.—"ice I("S' �mTa 74 Q751AYPi Kf' osmor _ 123 '\91f 0395 7mra ar7B 91tr 4 �A BOEMARY ig� as ;7mB5 mar 9ras ,gf I� \ f2LH_Si� 7 2s 7 9.J7 mf8 f 212r 4.� t78 9189 f� 1 .,a'�-°—at01 a b,9s 9)59 9f8a rI' w9)zat turoa9e mer m m+a r% ��p��b)ra1_j'�j "'r)e�9r9z oaev qa t Yn"'mtQ'3l65f 1111119f•S ,a 9aea 9f 9001 99m'9eaa 9 no 9fr39fTi frs �'^�I�� • 9�5 t]5 5 " i!?i92�j�9�rolC'99t168 15b97�it}'90at mr7 v n ➢Ji9 , mn �ti.9,� ydf4 9m0 p�L " 937��a i 9t ✓N69' g.� 21 37 9'9 j 9ta'_ l 9254 ' N N.T.S. ' 1.arum y4t�.of ttsf EXHIBIT A PAGE 4Z aY EXISTING HIGHIJNE WATER DISTRICT 2 P SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY 14711 29B Plae S"ftT ° Belleue,Washmgwn 984 ,07 con aEL 4258657877 Fax425.5857963 26 08 DESIGN IP01E'4tB /A'R pSMC^QMIr 1I �\ CAR 3C t0 P2-4 POJNT 'B" , S. 216TH Sr MEW Iw o?D/SIRltC7 TRACT T' I TRACT 'Y ¢ —.SERW E AREATf O 6880t AC Qw -'- 7RAcr CZ.-4 lRaCT T P� 2.96476 A e F n Q t - h -+ h TRACT 2" n n 2 I Cd 0 �' h )?AC. AG o PARCEL TRACT flAC.32t 4 . r Is, AC U AC 1RA0t 128C 7R�AfCT ACr 9C' PARCEL t58pT3f AG 6 A r- t , 6.9Wt AC I 10 TRACT -M' 43768t A L7RACr iV'15 ' 7 8171 AC TRACT "W PARCEL Y eU 31Of6t AC I V 4.240Tf�AC Q eo w e �� � ail I N.T.S. �POINT A' \\ L_ TRACT 1 fp.5231t AG ERHIBIT B PAGE -Z ♦Q�� NEW HIOHUNE WATER DISTRICT I OF 2 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY v,T� con 14711 NE2 +Vl:Beikwe,WhMgton 4258857877 Fo.4258857953 SJLPMS:10 25 00 , DESIGN ,E ,, xmoRM pt r T { z T I r mx efdn �1 S104TFLp-L--r-j Mr >g PaNr c' Dore � I i mx AL'7Y NS17EX 4:01 f m. R APJcr rcr / ' �JMTv, �19�� E 11 "rr�" eorAvniver 20eTN S1S avz' 4n a 4�1,3wrai daf O of I va6f �a vmB iDfe+ nonnon 7 �If BnM ,m ! 4,f4 � muB1 awayt E arsf a d fj r ,.J,SZLi ;� 11Yle7ll t 4122 1t s +l ren !nfaB a, som t jf9,r nfFs mT� xf oust 1 aioB 7B a, 9i,F Sf91 67IDIE1) 9flf—,s!23$TijyY , � tltl dBMn77(7 9,?f Lo a �__48��I d Ov' as7 fal 1 3ffiII 910 1 th� { ) 9fSe I'�..t 4789 r(f eb9a4t 1 afa7 Do1�•, 1 �9fao �111�"' c7fs +Bro,41 mea j v, 1 mni vAl C } 1 f3 /-9ITal wI f LL t�6' m�YvnBi G' 0 7r, vasf 9D748 t/ &?7) 4feBif 4,aafi "j,J ors. r POW B' s,itt "'4ms ' reTsl pm I 3 It ..IIft9`n4 ' N 1 N.T.S. y_asp EXHIBIT B PAGE ~ p $ NEW HIOHLINE WATER DISTRICT SERVICE a' o AREA BOUNDARY 2 OF 2 c= • ,.a� cam s« 1471 J W VA Hots Sv 101 AL LA� Bewa, ,Wosf,fnp+on 9E007 415895787T Fax 4238857969 ��=10 2e 06 DESIGN -f a ,0]76 mz6 n E.,om + r / � �.�'��'' *s PaHr r jP]r. roar� IV 'Sf- Dro3 J jj j asrs7mcr�cr snv' i i m>• .� earA+ro , -�gt8H7H 8T 4 °asS99� '2B8TN- got. �-�933a _ 9JaP > f.90De 4a6T� 9 4tv ■ �9t8S , da,5.963 d>SP p,6i� f bast 1 $f88TH_S7 D 31 pfm g,pr 1 pt&S 96 1]SD tOG tt4766, ona 9:0 4' D.M3 \ 041 02 Da9t r fow S,9Ats i nasas� as3s r t �;m�ctaP roi]s \ �6P es or v,7s fa , 03rs'I �bt7D i mir DP° 91st t r Sbol 9129 D943 r 1 212TH•S(�� �' �J mssroDrr 10,37 Lsiio 112 GSDfSu603Wn� PDt Yl j' 67ryt]Erjt(f ms4 �0 t t jr _p � �Sy8tA3. P ir0,}b mtb 9pbP Ptalk ° ` 4ati5 406,4]Ie r9 W PMB1 J9,L9„9,T �(t 'It-5 I'llD, 9,Iet J 9tb99°9 5 Dlb S,ui S 4 9PJi �yr >Px42 Y]jj f( 9TE3 f q T J a f bt30 rF7r T " Dose 9170 j99f9�1 it 60 90" ``.A -We POINT B,—� N.T.S. r_. T EXHIBIT BPABE NEW HIOHUNE WATER DISTRICT SERVICE 2 OF 2AREA BOUNDARY147Ir, 29,62to. Svnc lotALLM_ con Bellevue,Wosfivepton 9B0o7 4258857877 Fax4253857463 1 = 10 26 86 ' DESIGN 1 ' CORE DESIGN, INC. BELLEVUE WA 98007 CORE PROJECT NO: 96098 07/27/05 EXHIBIT "C" Amended Highline Water District Service Area Legal Description All those portions of Section 3,Township 22 North, Range 4 East, W.M., Section 10, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, W.M. and Section 15, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, W.M.,in King County Washington, East of the existing Corporate Boundary Line of the Highline Water District and West of the following described line: COMMENCING at the North quarter corner of said Section 15; thence S00°45'33"W along the west line of the northeast quarter of said Section 15, a distance of 1652.89 feet to the northerly line of property owned by the City of Kent and a line which is 1000.00 feet north of the south line of the northeast quarter of said section 15 when measured at a right angle to said south line, said point being on the Corporate Boundary Line of the Highline Water District and being the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described parcel, and herein known as Point"A"; Thence S89°51'33"E 301.57 feet to the east line of Tract `R' as shown in a Record of Survey recorded under King County Recording No. 19991123900001; thence N00009'08"E 111.00 feet along said east line to the northerly corner common to Tract 'R' and Tract `P';thence along the westerly boundary of said Tract 'P' the following courses and distances;N81°43'00"E 273.00 feet; thence N08°51'00"W 479.00 feet; thence N20046'00"W 300.00 feet;thence N09°17'00"E 607.00 feet; thence N68°13'00"E 54.00 feet; thence N00°24136"W 133.96 feet to the southerly boundary of Tract `M'; thence along said southerly boundary S89°35'24"W 263.29 feet to the southeast corner of Tract `N'; thence continuing along said southerly boundary of Tract `N' S89°35'24"W 253.87 feet to the aforesaid North quarter corner of Section 15; thence continuing along said southerly boundary of Tract 'N' S89°3512411W 520.65 feet to the easterly margin of tract `V',also known as 44t' Ave. South and Riverview Blvd. South;thence along said easterly margin of Tract`V' N21°47'15"W 27 17 feet; thence along said margin and along a curve to the right,through a central angle of 14'52'04", an are distance of 103.02 ' feet to the northerly boundary of said Tract `N'; thence along said northerly boundary of Tract `N' N89°35'24"E 809.18 feet to the northeast corner of Tract `N' and the northwest corner of Tract `M'; thence along the northerly boundary of said Tract `M' N89°35'24"E 189.78 feet to the southeast comer of Parcel 'B', thence along the boundary of Parcel 'B' N13001'00"E 25.70 feet to the southwest corner of Tract 'H'; thence the following courses and distances along said easterly line of Parcel "B',NLi°01'00"E 97.30 feet; thence N07°18'00"W 168.00 feet, thence N08°03'00"E 114.00 feet;thence N17°49'00"E 273.00 feet; thence N28°57'00"E 124.00 feet;thence N42°30'00"E 172.81 feet; thence ' N43042'00"W 247.00 feet to a point of tangency with a 275.00 foot radius curve to the left; thence northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 11'17'20", an are distance of 54.18 feet to a point of tangency; thence N54°59'20"W 150.41 feet to the 1 southeast margin of aforesaid Tract V; thence N37°04'18"E, along said margin, 60.04 KENTIHIGHLINE 13OUNDARY INTERLOCAL -6- feet;thence S54°59'20"E, along the northeast line of said Tract H, 148.25 feet to a point of tangency with a 335.00 foot radius curve to the right; thence southeasterly along said curve, through a central angle of 11'17'20", an arc distance of 66.00 feet to a point of tangency;thence S43042'00"E 194.30 feet to the most southerly corner of Tract J; thence northerly along the easterly boundary of said Tract J,the following courses and distances; thence N09°35'53"E 90.00 feet; thence N80°24'07"W 80.00 feet; thence N05°39'22"E 200.90 feet;thenceN76°46'0T'W 84.59 feet; thenceN01°57'28"E 159.11 feet: thence S88002'32"E 65.46 feet, thence N06°35'04"E 174.32 feet; thence N56'06'20"E 49.69 feet; thence NO2°30'04"E 176.68 feet; thence S76°45'26"E 13.87 feet; thence N11012'46"W 211.55 feet; thenceN87°50'36"W 32.81 feet;thence N01'13'21"W 223.23 feet;thence N89°58'34"E 22.12 feet;thence N15°22'56"W 249.00 feet to the centerline of South 216`h Street; thence S89°58'34"W along said centerline 600.20 feet to the northwest corner of the southeast quarter of said Section 10 and herein known as Point`B";thence continuing S89°58'34"W 78.57 feet more or less to a point that lies at the intersection of said centerline and a line drawn perpendicular to the northwesterly margin of 42nd Avenue South; thence northerly along said perpendicular line to the intersection of the northerly margin of said South 216`h Street with the said northwesterly margin of said 42"d Avenue South; thence northeasterly and northerly along said northwesterly and the westerly margin of 42"d Avenue South to the westerly margin of Orilla Road South;thence continuing northerly along said westerly margin to the intersection of said westerly margin and the northerly property line of Tax Lot No. 032204-9025-09, said northerly line being 260 feet south of and parallel with the north line of the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of said Section 3; thence westerly along said northerly line to the intersection with the west line of the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter, said intersection being a point on the Corporate Boundary Line of the Highline Water District and being known as Point"C" and the terminus of this description. KENTMIGHLINE BOUNDARY INTERLOCAL -7- , Kent City Council Meeting Date December] 2005 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: KENT DRINKING DRIVER TASK FORCE RE-APPOINTMENT— CONFIRM 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirmation of the Mayor's re-appointments of Ms. Mary Lou Beevar, Ms. Becky Hanks, Ms. Pamela Nazarene and Mr. David Malik to continue serving as members of the Kent Drinking Driver Task Force. Their new appointments will continue until 1/1/09. 3. EXHIBITS: Memorandum 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor White (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A ' Currently in the Budget? Yes No If no• Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue. Fund Amount $ 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds 1 DISCUSSION: ACTION: ' Council Agenda Item No. 6CC OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Jim White, Mayor Phone:253-856-5700 Fax 253-856-6700 �j Address. 220 Fourth Avenue S KENT Kent,WA 98032-5895 WASHINOTON MEMORANDUM TO: DR. DEBORAH RANNIGER, CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: JIM WHITE, MAYOR DATE: DECEMBER 5, 2005 SUBJECT: RE-APPOINTMENTS TO KENT DRINKING DRIVER TASK FORCE I have re-appointed Ms. Mary Lou Becvar, Ms. Becky Hanks, Ms. Pamela Nazarene and Mr. David Malik to continue serving as members of the Kent Drinking Driver Task Force. Their new ' appointments will continue until 1/l/09. I submit this for your confirmation. t jb 1 Kent City Council Meeting Date_ December 11 2005 § Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION DIRECTORS RE-APPOINTMENT — CONFIRM 1 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirmation of the Mayor's re-appointment of Mr. Ron Banister to continue serving as a member of the Kent Economic Development Corporation Directors. His new appointment will continue until 12/31/09. 3. EXHIBITS: Memorandum 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor White (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes No If no: Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue. Fund Amount $ 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds 1 DISCUSSION- ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6DD r OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Jim White, Mayor Phone:253-856-5700 Fax 253-856-6700 Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. NS:!!5!KENT Kent,WA 98032-5895 WASNINOtON MEMORANDUM TO: DR. DEBORAH RA ER' CTTY COUNCIL PRESIDENT CITY COUNCIL MEM RS FROM: JIM WHITE, MAYOR ' DATE: DECEMBER 5,2005 SUBJECT: RE-APPOINTMENT TO KENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION DIRECTORS I have re-appointed Mr. Ron Banister to continue serving as a member of the Kent Economic Development Corporation Directors. His new appointment will continue until 12/31/09. I submit this for your confirmation. ' jb r r r r r r r ' Kent City Council Meeting Date_ December 13, 2005 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS AND RE-APPOINTMENT — CONFIRM I2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirmation of the Mayor's re-appointment of Ms. Cathy Peters to continue serving as a member of the Kent Human Services Commission. Ms. Peter's new appointment will continue through 12/31/08. Confirmation of the Mayor's appointment of Mr Rico Yingling to serve on the Commission. Mr. Yingling is a local businessman and will represent the "Business" category. He is a former City Councilman and familiar with the work the Commission perform. He is looking forward to serving. Mr. Yingling's new appointment will begin 1/1/06 and continue through 12/31/08 He will replace Mr. Rod Saalfeld, whose term expires 1/l/06. Confirmation of the Mayor's appointment Ms. Marilyn LaCelle, Valley Cities Director, as the Non-Voting Agency positron on the Human Services Commission This is a two- year appointment. Her new appointment will begin 1/t/06 and continue to 12/31/07. ' 3. EXHIBITS: Memorandum 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor White (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc ) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget9 Yes No If no: Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund Amount $ 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION. Council Agenda Item No. 6EE 1 OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Jim White, Mayor -- Phone.253-856-5700 Fax: 253-85&6700 Address 220 Fourth Avenue S. KEN Kent,WA 98032-5895 WASHINOTON MEMORANDUM TO: DR.DEBORAH RANNIGER,COUNCIL PRESIDENT 1 CITY COUNCIL MEM FROM: JIM WHITE, MAYOR DATE: DECEMBER 5,2005 RE: RE-APPOINTMENT AND APPOINTMENTS TO KENT HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION I have reappointed Ms. Cathy Peters to continue serving as a member of the Kent Human Services Commission. Ms. Peter's new appointment will continue through 12/31/08. i I have also appointed Mr. Rico Yingling to serve on the Commission. Mr. Yingling is a local businessman and will represent the "Business" category. He is a former City Councilman and familiar with the work the Commission perform. He is looking forward to serving. Mr. Yingling's new appointment will begin 1/l/06 and continue through 12/31/08. He will replace Mr. Rod Saalfeld,whose term expires 1/1/06. I have also appointed Ms. Marilyn LaCelle,Valley Cities Director, as the Non-Voting Agency position on the Human Services Commission This is a two year appointment. Her new appointment will begin 1/1/06 and continue to12/31/07. I submit this for your confirmation. Y Jb 1 j i I �� Kent City Council Meeting Date__ December 13, 2005 "'Tategory Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: LAND USE AND PLANNING BOARD APPOINTMENTS AND RE-APPOINTMENT — CONFIRM 1 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirmation of the Mayor's re-appointment of Mr Kenneth Wendling to continue serving as member of the Kent Land Use and Planning Board. Mr. Wendhng's new appointment will continue through 12/31/08. Confirmation of the Mayor's appointment of Mr Jack Ottini to serve as a new member of the Land Use and Planning Board. Mr Ottim is a Kent resident, and was very active in the very successful Meridian Valley Annexation. He has expressed interest in serving our citizens through the Land Use and Planning Board and is looking forward to serving Mr Ottmi's new appointment will begin l/1/06 and continue through 12/31/08. He will replace Mr. Devendra (David) Malik, whose term expires 12/31/05. ISince Ms. Elizabeth Watson's current appointment will end on 12/31/05 due to her election as a City Council Member, the Mayor has appointed Mr. Mark Albertson to fill her position. He is an attorney and has an office in Kent. With his law background and experience as a community advocate, he will be a good addition to the Board. Mr. Albertson's appointment will continue until 12/31/06. 3. EXHIBITS: Memorandum 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor White (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes No If no Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue. Fund Amount $ 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION. Council Agenda Item No 6FF OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Jim White, Mayor - _ Phone:253-8-k&5700 Fax- 253-856-6700 Address. 220 Fourth Avenue S KENT Kent,WA 98032-5895 WASHINOTON MEMORANDUM TO: DIL DEBORAH RANNIGER, COUNCIL PRESIDENT CITY COUNCIL MEXACK01 'I FROM: JIM WHITE, MAYOR DATE: DECEMBER 5, 2005 RE: RE-APPOINTMENT AND APPOINTMENT TO KENT LAND USE AND PLANNING BOARD I have reappointed Mr. Kenneth Wending to continue serving as a member of the Kent Land �PPo g g IUse and Planning Board. Mr. Wendling's new appointment will continue through 12/31/08. I have also appointed Mr. Jack Ottini to serve as a new member of the Land Use and Planning Board. Mr. Ottini is a Kent resident, and was very active in the very successful Meridian Valley Annexation. He has expressed interest in serving our citizens through the Land Use and Planning Board and is looking forward to serving. Mr. Ottini's new appointment will begin 1/1/06 and continue through 12/31/08. He will replace Mr. Devendra(David)Malik,whose term expires 12/31/05. Since Ms. Elizabeth Watson's current will end on 12/31/05 due to her election as a City Council Member, I have appointed Mr. Mark Albertson to fill her position. He is an attorney and has an office in Kent. With his law background and experience as a community advocate,he will be a good addition to the Board. Mr.Albertson's appointment will continue until 12/31/06. 1 submit this for your confirmation. i jb T ■ Kent City Council Meeting _Date— December]3, 2005 `�ategory Consent Calendar I. SUBJECT: KENT ARTS COMMISSION APPOINTMENT— CONFIRM 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirmation of the Mayor's appointment of Mr. Jack Becvar to serve as a member of the Kent Arts Commission. Mr Becvar has for many years been associated with the City's heritage through the collection, preservation and display of the City's past, present and future He feels he will be helpful to the Commission. Mr Becvar was instrumental in the creation of The Greater Kent Historical Society and its Museum. He will replace Diana Albertson, who resigned. Mr. Beevar's appointment will continue until 10/31/09. 3. EXHIBITS: Memorandum 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor White (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes No If no: Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue. Fund Amount $ 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No 6GG r OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Jim White, Mayor Phone:253.856-5700 Fax 253-856-6700 Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. KENT Kent,WA 98032-5895 WASHINGTON ffI ly MEMORANDUM TO: DR. DEBORAH RANNIGER, COUNCIL PRESIDENT CITY COUNCIL ME RS FROM: JIM WHITE, MAY DATE: DECEMBER S, 2005 RE: APPOINTMENT TO KENT ARTS COMMISSION I have appointed Mr. Jack Beevar to serve as a member ob the Kent Arts Commission. Mr. Becvar has for many years been associated with the City's heritage through the collection, preservation and display of our City's past,present and future. It is an art form that he feels he can share and feels will be helpful to the Commission. He is knowledgeable about the City and its history and has been a City Historian,was instrumental in the creation of The Greater Kent Historical Society and its Museum. He will replace Diana Albertson,who resigned. His appointment will continue until 10/31109. I submit this for your confirmation. Jb r r r r � r r � r Kent City Council Meeting AV Date—December 13, 2005 "IMegory Other Business 1. SUBJECT: SOPHIA GLENNBRENNA'S VISTA II REZONE— APPROVE (QUASI-JUDICIAL) 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This request by Pacific West Development, LLC., is to rezone 22 34 acres of property from SR-4 5 (Single-Family Residential), to SR-6 (Single-Family Residential). The property is located at 20227 and 20429 92nd Avenue South The Kent Hearing Examiner held a Public Hearing on October 5, 2005, and issued Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation for approval on October 19, 2005. 3. EXHIBITS: Staff report with map; and Hearing Examiner Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Hearing Examiner (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? No Revenue? No Currently in the Budget? Yes No If no: Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue. Fund Amount $ 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember � moves, Councilmember 14AAA. seconds to acce t/ the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Hearing P n��e� Examiner on the Sophia Glenn/Brenna's Vista II Rezone and to direct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance. n n DISCUSSION: aC W+� ACTION: (�WJ Council Agenda Item No 7A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Fred N Satterstrom, Director PLANNING SERVICES Charlene Anderson, AICP, Manager KENT WASHINGTON Phone 253-856-5454 ' Fax 253-856-6454 Address 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent, WA 98032-5895 KENT PLANNING SERVICES 1 (253) 856-5454 STAFF REPORT FOR HEARING EXAMINER MEETING OF October 5, 2005 1 FILE NO- Sophia Glenn aka Brenna's Vista II Rezone#RZ-2005-1 KIVA#RPP4-2050146 APPLICANT- Pacific West Development LLC 2201 Lind Avenue SW, Suite #105 Renton, WA 98055 REQUEST- A Zoning Map Amendment (Rezone) for four (4) I existing tax parcels from SR-4 5 Single Family Residential to SR-6, Single Family Residential. STAFF REPRESENTATIVE: Matt Gilbert, Planner STAFF RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Description of the Proposal The applicant proposes to rezone a 22 34 acre site currently zoned SR-4 5, Single Family Residential to SR-6, Single Family Residential The site is identified on the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan Map as SF-6 Single Family/6 units per acre In 2003 and 2004, separate amendments established the current Zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations for the site The subject site is comprised of four tax parcels B. Location The subject property is located just south of 200th Street adjacent to the SR-167 right of way. The site is currently addressed as 20227 and 20429 92"d Avenue S I Staff Report Sophia Glenn aka Brenna's Vista II Rezone #RZ-2005-1 KIVA#RPP4-2050146" The four parcels are identified by King County tax parcel numbers 062205-9007, -9034, -9025 and -9045 , C. Size of Property The subject property is approximately 22.34 acres D Zoning/Comprehensive Plan The property is currently zoned SR-4 5 Single Family Residential Properties located to the north are zoned SR-2 Properties to the east are zoned SR-6 and properties to the south are SR-4.5 The Valley Freeway (SR-167) borders the site to the west Land beyond the freeway is zoned M2, Limited Industrial The City of Kent Comprehensive Plan designates the site, together with , properties to the east and south, as SF6, Single Family (6 units/acre) Properties to the north are designated SF-3, Single Family Residential (3 units/acre) Land to the west, across the Valley Freeway, is designated as MIC, Manufacturing Industrial Center. Utilizing gross acreage, the SR-6 zoning designation would allow for the development of approximately 135 single family detached units, as opposed to 100 single family units under the existing SR-4 5 designation However, due to the land area requirements associated with stormwater management systems, roadways and other improvements, fewer lots are anticipated for this site E. Land Use The site of this proposed rezone is currently developed with one house, and several scattered outbuildings A small potential wetland area has been identified near the western boundary of the site. While most of the surrounding developed properties are located in the SR-6 zoning district, the intensity of development varies Low and medium density development generally characterizes this section of 92nd Avenue with homes on platted and unplatted lots Future development of this 22 3 acre site will be significant in defining the character of this part of Kent Additionally, the City is currently processing a SR-4 5 to SR-6 rezone and plat application for the three southern adjacent parcels Properties located north of the subject site are zoned SR-2 and feature very low density residential development on one to four acre parcels F. History The property is part of 320 acres annexed to the City of Kent on March 15, 1959 under Ordinance No 320 Page 2 of 15 Staff Report Sophia Glenn aka Brenna's Vista II Rezone #RZ-2005-1 KIVA#RPP4-2050146 In 1997 the two northern parcels (062205-9025 and -9007), which represent the majority of the subject site, were rezoned from SR-1 to SR-3 under Ordinance 3359 In 2002, the City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map amendment on the northernmost parcel (062205-9025) to establish the SF-6 Comprehensive Plan designation and the current SR-4 5 zoning designation (ref Ord 3637 & 3640) During the 2004 update of the City's Comprehensive Plan, the City Council extended the SF-6 Comprehensive Plan designation and SR-4 5 Zoning designation to several properties along 92"d Avenue including all parcels of the subject site (ref Ord 3698) II ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS A Environmental Assessment IAmending the City's zoning map is considered a "non-project" action under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) A Determination of Nonsignificance (ENV-2005-3) for the rezone proposal was issued on September 7, 2005 No conditions for this rezone request were proposed. Subsequent development proposals for the subject property will require additional environmental review in conjunction with construction permits, subdivision, and other project permit applications iB Significant Physical Features Topography. Wetlands and Vegetation The grade of the subject site generally falls from east to west at a 16 percent overall grade with maximum slopes of 25 percent Vegetation consists of a variety of scrub grasses, blackberries and various species of small trees While the applicant has not identified any wetland areas on the subject site, a small wetland appears to be located near the western boundary of the site Per section 11 05 of the Kent City Code, a wetland delineation of this area shall be submitted with any development proposal for this site Also, an open drainage ditch is located on parcel 0622059025 Based on currently available information, this Ifeature is a non-classified waterway and not subject to sensitive area restrictions Because the proposed rezone does not contemplate a development proposal at this time, staff has not analyzed on-site environmental impacts associated with potential development Development impacts will be analyzed in the SEPA checklist submitted with any specific development projects proposed for the site Page 3 of 15 Staff Report Sophia Glenn aka Brenna's Vista II Rezone #RZ-2005-1 KIVA #RPP4-2050146 C Significant Social Features 1. Street System The proposed development project is located within the East Hill area of , the City, and will take its primary access from 92"d Avenue S This existing but substandard street has an existing public right-of-way width of about 66-feet, while the asphalt street width is currently about 22 to 24- feet wide The existing street provides for two narrow lanes of traffic, and does not include the following other improvements cement concrete curbs & gutters, stormwater drainage system, planter strips, cement concrete sidewalks, or an approved street lighting system. The proposed development is also adjacent to SE 202"d Street This second street has an existing public right-of-way width of about 40-feet, while the asphalt street width is currently about 22-feet wide The existing street provides for two narrow lanes of traffic, and does not include the following other improvements cement concrete curbs & gutters; stormwater drainage system; cement concrete sidewalks, or a street lighting system near 92"d Avenue South. 92"d Avenue South is classified as a Residential Collector Arterial Street Augmented with Bike Lanes upon the City's Comprehensive Plan, which will require a minimum of 70-feet of public right-of-way; a 44-foot wide asphalt roadway with three traffic lanes, plus two in-street bike lanes, combined curbs & gutters and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks and 5-foot wide planters on both sides of the street, a stormwater drainage system, a City-approved street lighting system; public utilities, and other street appurtenances when fully improved Southeast 202"d Street is classified as a Residential Street upon the City's Comprehensive Plan, which will require- a minimum of 50-feet of public right-of-way, a 28-foot wide asphalt roadway with two traffic lanes, plus two in-street parking strips, combined curbs & gutters, a 5-foot wide planter and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks on both sides of the street, a stormwater drainage system, a City—approved street lighting system, public utilities, and other street appurtenances when fully improved This development is within an area, which is characterized by streets with narrow traffic lanes and narrow or no shoulders, and has been identified as having substandard pedestrian facilities The subsequent subdivision development will require off-site sidewalks/walkways to provide safe travel for school-age pedestrians to and from Springbrook Elementary School Page 4 of 15 Staff Report Sophia Glenn aka Brenna's Vista II Rezone #RZ-2005-1 KIVA#RPP4-2050146 `"'=""=r Neither 92"d Avenue S nor SE 202"d Street is currently improved to their full design standard, and both will require improvement/widening in conjunction with this development to support this project and continued development in the area. The additional lots created as a result of the proposed rezone, above the number of lots permitted with the SR-3 Zoning, will be assessed at the full-rate of $1,794 (at today's inflation rate) per PM Peak Hour Trip for the City's East Leg of the South 196`h Street Corridor Project, prior to issuance of Budding Permits for the subsequent subdivisions 2. Water System Water service is provided by the City of Kent and is currently available System improvements will be necessary to accommodate any subsequent development 3. Sanitary Sewer System Sanitary sewer service is currently provided by the City of Kent An 18 inch sewer pipe is located along the western boundary of the site and is available to serve the site. 4. Stormwater System A stormwater system will be necessary to accommodate any subsequent development The developer will be required to construct a stormwater treatment system in accordance with Kent Construction Standards in conjunction with a development proposal D. CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS The proposed rezone is consistent with the goals and policies of the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan III CONSULTED DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES The following departments and agencies were advised of this application Chief Administrative Officer City Attorney Director of Public Works Chief of Police Parks & Recreation Director Fire Chief Building Official City Clerk King County Environmental Health US Postmaster Washington State Dept of Ecology Puget Sound Energy Washington State Dept of Transportation Kent School District Page 5 of 15 Staff Report Sophia Glenn aka Brenna's Vista II Rezone #RZ-2005-1 KIVA#RPP4-2050146 Qwest King County Transit Div. King County Wastewater Treatment Div In addition to the above, all persons owning property which lies within 300 feet of the site were notified of the application and of the public hearing No public comments were received pertaining to this proposal. IV. PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEW A. Comprehensive Plan In 2004 the Kent City Council adopted an update to the Kent Comprehensive Plan which represented revisions to demographics, housing and employment forecasts, and relevant goals and policies affected by the referenced inclusion of pertinent local and regional policy documents As with the 1995 plan, the 2004 update was prepared under the provision of the Washington State Growth Management Act The comprehensive plan, through its goals and policies, presents a clear expression of the City's vision of growth for citizens, the development community, and other public agencies The plan is used by the Mayor, City Council, Land Use and Planning Board, Hearing Examiner, and the city departments to guide decisions on amendments to the City's zoning code and other developed regulations, which must be consistent with the plan, as well as guide decision making about the funding and location of the capital improvement projects. LAND USE ELEMENT The Land Use Element of the plan contains a Land Use Plan Map, which designatcs the type and intensity of land uses throughout the city, as well as in the entire potential annexation area The Land Use Plan Map designates the subject property as SF-6, Single Family Residential which allows six units per acre The land use element also contains goals and policies relating to the location, density, and design of future development in the City and in the , Potential Annexation Area Overall Goal Encourage a future growth and development pattern which implements the community's vision, protects environmentally sensitive areas, and enhances the quality of life of all of Kent's residents Goal LU-9 Provide adequate land and densities to accommodate the adopted 20 year housing target of 4,284 new dwelling units within the existing city limits, and through an interlocal agreement with King County, adopt the housing target of 619 new dwelling units within Kent's Potential Annexation Area Page 6 of 15 Staff Report Sophia Glenn aka Brenna's Vista II Rezone #RZ-2005-1 KIVA#RPP4-2050146 Policy LU-9 1 Where appropriate, establish urban residential densities of at least four (4) units per net developable acre in order to adequately support urban densities Policy LU-9 4 Locate housing opportunities with a variety of densities within close proximity to employment, shopping, transit, and where possible, near human and community services Goal LU-10• Provide opportunities for a variety of housing types, options, and densities throughout the City and the Potential Annexation Area to meet the housing needs of the region's changing demographics. Policy LU-10 4: Allow single family housing on a variety of lot sizes Locate smaller lot sizes within close proximity to the Urban Center or Activity Centers wherever possible Planning Services Comment: The goals and policies of the land use element support the proposed rezone The proposed location is located near existing urban services and infrastructure The City supports the development of close-in vacant or underdeveloped properties which limits further urban sprawl on the edges of the planning area In addition, infill development provides a more efficient means of providing services and enhancing pedestrian mobility Also, one of the objectives of the comprehensive plan is to provide a wide variety of housing types and opportunities to accommodate projected population growth without converting single family lands to multifamily residential Development of single family subdivisions on underdeveloped, single family zoned land is consistent with this objective Growth Management Hearings Board decisions have determined that lands within urban growth areas should be divided at a minimum of four dwelling units per net acre to ensure efficient provision of urban services The zoning district SR-6 allows 6 05 dwelling units per acre and a minimum lot size of 5,700 square feet. HOUSING ELEMENT Goal* Meet the current and future need for housing in the Kent area Ensure opportunities and an appropriate living environment for Kent citizens Goal H-2• Promote the organization an enhancement of neighborhoods, and provide the opportunity for comfortable and well maintained housing for all citizens. Policy H-2 2 Support housing with appropriate amenities for individuals, families and children II Page 7 of 15 1 Staff Report Sophia Glenn aka Brenna's Vista II Rezone #RZ-2005-1 KIVA#RPP4-2050146 - - - Goal H-5 Increase housing opportunities through a diversity of housing types and the innovative use of residential and commercial land Policy H-5.1• Expand the range of affordable housing choice available to meet the needs of both current Kent residents and residents projected in growth estimates Policy H-5 2 Provide a sufficient amount of land zoned for current and projected residential needs including, but not limited to, assisted housing, housing for low income households, single family housing, and small lot sizes Policy H-5 3, Promote diversity of housing types affordable to a range of income levels and cultural/ethnic diversity Goal H-7: Encourage flexibility and innovative site and building design for a variety of housing developments to expand home ownership Policy H-7.5 Revise zoning and development standards to provide options that increase the supply of affordable home ownership opportunities, such as small lot sizes, zero lot lines, manufactured housing, townhouses, condominiums, clustering, cottage and attached single family housing Planning Services Comment The proposed rezone is supported by relevant goals and policies of the housing element Appropriate services, including, but not limited to, fire, police, medical services, neighborhood shopping and child care are easily accessible to neighborhood residents upon development of the subject property The proposed rezone increases the amount of land zoned for current and projected residential needs including single family housing and smaller lot sizes TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Goal TR-1: Coordinate land use and transportation planning to meet the needs of the City and the requirements of the Growth Management Act Policy TR-1.2: Coordinate new commercial and residential development in Kent with transportation projects to assure that transportation facility capacity is sufficient to accommodate the new development, or a financial commitment is in place to meet the adopted standard within six years, before allowing it to proceed. Policy TR-1 5 Ensure consistency between land use and transportation plans so that land use and adjacent transportation facilities are compatible Page 8 of 15 Staff Report Sophia Glenn aka Brenna's Vista II Rezone #RZ-2005-1 KIVA#RPP4-2050146 Planning Services Comment: The Growth Management Act requires consistency between land use and transportation planning. As noted, the Land Use Plan identifies the area of the rezone as SF 6 Single Family Residential When developed in the future, a new development will include interconnected roadways and pedestrian facilities The City's Public Works Department will identify specific improvements which will be necessary along the 92"d Avenue South property frontage to serve future development of the property and accommodate the higher density permitted under this rezone. B. Standards and Criteria for a Rezone Request The following standards and criteria (Kent Zoning Code, Section 15 09 050) are used by the Hearing Examiner and City Council to evaluate a request for a rezone A zoning map amendment shall only be granted if the City Council determines that the request is consistent with these standards and criteria 1 The proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Planning Services Comment The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan Map designates the subject property as SF 6, Single Family Residential which allows up to six units per acre A rezone of the site from SR-4 5 Single Family Residential to SR-6 Single Family Residential will allow residential development up to six units per acre, which is also allowed under the Comprehensive Plan. As previously mentioned, the proposed rezone is also consistent with the applicable goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan ' 2. The proposed rezone and subsequent development of the site would be compatible with development in the vicinity Planning Services Comment The proposed rezone and subsequent development of the site would be compatible and integrate well with the existing development in the vicinity Future development on the subject site will be part of a residential area defined on the north by 200th Street, on the south by 208th Street and on the west by the Valley Freeway This area features low to medium density residential development in located both in subdivisions and on unplatted lots The proposed SR-6 zoning designation allows for 6 05 units per acre, a medium density designation As previously noted, the City is currently processing an SR-4 5 to SR-6 rezone and plat proposal for the three southern adjacent properties The Valley Freeway (SR-167) abuts the site along the western boundary i Page 9 of 15 Staff Report Sophia Glenn aka Brenna's Vista II Rezone #RZ-2005-1 KIVA#RPP4-2050146 3. The proposed rezone will not unduly burden the transportation system in the vicinity of the property with significant adverse impacts which cannot ' be mitigated Planning Services Comment A rezone of this property to SR-6, Single Family Residential will not generate additional trips onto the existing transportation system However, future development of a subdivision will add trips to the local street system Upon future development of the site, road and street frontage improvements to meet the City of Kent roadway standards will be required as conditions of approval These improvements include but are not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalks, planting strips, street lighting, paving, necessary street improvements, and public stormwater conveyance The applicant will be required to participate in other City transportation improvement protects by providing an environmental mitigation fee for the impacts created by future development 4. Circumstances have changed substantially since the establishment of the current zoning district to warrant the proposed rezone Planning Services Comment In 2002 the City Council established the SF-6 Comprehensive Plan designation and SR-4 5 zoning designation for the northernmost parcel of this site In 2004, as part of the Comprehensive Plan update, the Council extended these designations to the entire 48 acre area between 92"d Avenue and the Valley Freeway, south of 2001h Street and north of 2081h Street In 2005 the City Council passed an updated Critical Area Ordinance In part, the new CAO allows home builders greater flexibility when locating new buildings on hillside areas In short, the former hillside development regulations set static numerical limitations on new development based on degree of slope, seismic stability, erosion and slide slippage potential The development limitations associated with the former hillside development regulations would likely have ' applied to areas of this site The new CAO allows development limitations to be set through a detailed geotechnical review process that includes site specific analysis and allows modern structural solutions to be applied to potentially hazardous areas Given this new flexibility, development of the subject the site is feasible The applicant proposes this rezone to support development of the subject site as envisioned by the Comprehensive Plan 5. The proposed rezone will not adversely affect the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Kent. Page 10 of 15 i 1 Staff Report Sophia Glenn aka Brenna's Vista II Rezone #RZ-2005-1 KIVA#RPP4-2050146 Planning Services Comment ' The proposed rezone is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan Subsequent development on the site will have to meet applicable codes and 1 regulations, including mitigation of anticipated transportation and environmental impacts Therefore, the rezone proposal will not adversely affect the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Kent 1 V. CITY STAFF RECOMMENDATION Upon review of the merits of this request and the Code criteria for granting a rezone, City 1 staff recommends APPROVAL of the rezone request with no conditions 1 1 KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT September 28, 2005 1 MG ch 1S 1PermitlPlan\rezone1200512050146-2005-1 report doc i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Page 11 of 15 W z a � a a oo � o nic) a � N C ' N (ucu - C Cl) N C o f/) � N ' co U) 92 Av S AW ' C _N 1 (D_ M SR 1 N Q N N OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER Theodore P Hunter •: x•_ -.- s Jam.>--. Hearing Exarn4nrm- •R-.€t-.v... FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION ' FILE NO: SOPHIA GLENN/BRENNA'S VISTA II #RZ-2005-1 KIVA #RPP4-2050146 ' APPLICANT: Pacific West Development LLC ' REQUEST: A zoning map amendment to rezone four parcels' totaling 22 34 acres from SR-4.5 ' (Single-Family Residential, maximum density 4.53 dwelling units per acre) to SR-6 (Single- Family Residential, maximum density 6.05 ' dwelling units per acre). LOCATION: 20227 and 20429 92"d Avenue S. APPLICATION FILED: January 18, 2005 ' DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE ISSUED: September 7, 2005 ' MEETING DATE: October 5, 2005 RECOMMENDATION ISSUED: October 19, 2005 ' RECOMMENDATION: APPROVED STAFF REPRESENTATIVE- Matt Gilbert, Planning Services PUBLIC TESTIMONY: Cory Martin representing applicant Other Donna Williamson ' EXHIBITS. 1. Staff report dated September 28, 2005 with the following attachments ' Tax Parcel Numbers 062205-9025, 062205-9007, 062205-9034, and 062205- 9045 Exhibit 1, Attachment A Findings, Conclusions & Recommendation ' Hearing Examiner for City of Kent Sophia Glenn/Brenna's Vista I/Rezone #RZ-2005-1 KIVA #RPP4-2050146 ' Page 1 of 7 - ` - -A. Rezone Application with Response to Criteria, ' Legal Description, Certificate of Water Availability, Certificate of Sewer Availability, , Application Cover Letter, and Boundary & Topography Map B. Correspondence from Carole Maxwell , C. City Department Routing and Responses D. Public Notice Documents, including affidavits, mailing list and publication correspondence ' E. Notice of Application / Completeness Documents, including affidavits, distribution list and publication correspondence D Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance 2. Comment Letter from Elizabeth Tweeten dated October 5, 2005 Based upon the testimony and evidence admitted at the open record hearing, the Hearing Examiner enters the following Findings and Conclusions: FINDINGS 1. The Applicant requested a zoning map amendment to rezone four parcels2 , totaling 22.34 acres from SR-4.5 (Single-Family Residential, maximum density 4.53 dwelling units per acre) to SR-6 (Single-Family Residential, maximum density 6 05 dwelling units per acre) The subject property is located on the west side of 92 d Avenue South, south of South 200th Street, in Kent, Washington. Exhibit 1, Staff Report, pages 1-2, Exhibit 1, Attachment A. , 2. The subject property and adjacent properties to the south are zoned SR-4 5. Adjacent properties to the east and north are zoned SR-6 and SR-2, respectively. The Valley Freeway (SR-167) borders the subject property to the west. Exhibit 1, Staff Report, page 2, Exhibit 1, Attachment A, Boundary & Topography Map 3. The City of Kent Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the subject , property and adjacent properties to the south and east as Single-Family, six units per acre (SF-6)3. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the ' adjacent properties to the north as SF-3. Exhibit 1, Staff Report, page 2. 2 Tax Parcel Numbers 062205-9025, 062205-9007, 062205-9034, and 062205-9045 Exhibit 1, ' Attachment A 3 Please note that the Comprehensive Plan designation has an "SF" prefix, whereas the Zoning Code designation has an "SR" prefix , Findings, Conclusions & Recommendation Hearing Examiner for City of Kent , Sophia Glenn/Brenna's Vista Il Rezone #RZ-2005-1 KIVA #RPP4-2050146 Page 2 of 7 ' 4. Surrounding development is characterized by low to medium-dersi -vesidemial L development Exhibit 1, Staff Report, page 2. 5. The City of Kent Comprehensive Plan contains the following goals and policies that are relevant to the rezone application. Goal LU-9 Provide adequate land and densities to accommodate the adopted 20 year housing target of 4,284 new dwelling units within existing city limits .... ' Policy LU-9.1: Where appropriate, establish urban residential densities of at least four (4) units per net developable acre in order to adequately support urban densities. Policy LU-9.4: Locate housing opportunities with a variety of densities within I close proximity to employment, shopping, transit, and where possible, near human and community services. Policy H-5 1 Expand the range of affordable housing choice available to meet the needs of both current Kent residents and residents projected in growth estimates. ' Goal TR-1 Coordinate land use and transportation planning to meet the needs of the City and the requirements of the Growth Management Act. Policy TR-1 2• Coordinate new commercial and residential development in Kent with transportation projects to assure that transportation facility capacity is sufficient to accommodate the new development .... Exhibit 1, Staff Report, pages 6-8. The proposed rezone sur)ports these goals ' and policies in that the subject property is served by existing urban services and infrastructure, and the density allowed by the rezone would accommodate additional population growth Future development of the property would require ' mitigation of impacts to the transportation system. Exhibit 1, Staff Report, pages 7-9. 6. The subject property was annexed to the City of Kent on March 15, 1959 In 1997, the City rezoned the northern two parcels (Tax Parcel Nos 062205-9025 and 062205-9007) from SR-1 to SR-3. In 2002, the City changed the Comprehensive Plan designation of Tax Parcel No. 062205-9025 to SF-6 and rezoned the parcel to SR-4 5 In 2004, the City changed the Comprehensive Plan designation of the remaining three parcels comprising the subject property to SF- ' 6, and rezoned the parcels to SR-4.5. Exhibit 1, Staff Report, pages 2-3 Findings, Conclusions & Recommendation ' Nearing Examiner for City of Kent Sophia Glenn/Brenna's Vista 11 Rezone #RZ-2005-1 KlVA #RPP4-2050146 ' Page 3 of 7 7 Circumstances have changed since the City adopted the SR-4.5- zoning of the ' subject property. The City adopted an updated Critical Areas Ordinance (CAO) in 2005 The new CAO allows hillside development limitations to be established through a detailed geotechnical review process The presence of slopes does , not necessarily preclude residential development; a developer may apply modern structural solutions to potentially hazardous areas In contrast, the previous CAO contained static numerical limitations on new development based on degree of slope, seismic stability and other considerations. The change is relevant to the proposed rezone because the subject property contains slopes that might be subject to regulation. With the flexibility offered by the new CAO, development of the subject property is feasible Exhibit 1, Staff Report, page 10; Testimony of Mr Gilbert. ' 8. The proposed rezone is not associated with a specific development proposal. However, based on the gross acreage of the site, the maximum number of dwelling units that could be developed under current SR-4 5 zoning is 100, and the maximum number of dwelling units that could be developed under the proposed SR-6 zoning is 135. Because this density calculation does not take into account development constraints such as the need to set aside land for roads and stormwater facilities, the actual number of dwelling units that could be developed on site would likely be less than the maximum allowed (the Applicant anticipates that the number would likely be less than 100). Additional constraints, such as a sewer easement and associated buffers along the western site boundary, a drainage course on a portion of the subject property, and a potential wetland along the western site boundary, could further limit the development potential of the subject property. These features would be reviewed when specific development is proposed. Exhibit 1, Staff Report, pages 2 & 3, Exhibit 1, Attachment A, Boundary & Topography Map; Exhibit 2; Testimony of Mr. Gilbert; Testimony of Mr Martin. 9. The City of Kent streets that would be potentially affected by future development , of the subject property - 92"d Avenue South and SE 202"d Street - are both substandard under the City's street standards. Residential Collector Arterial ' Streets Augmented with Bike Lanes such as 92"d Avenue should have a right-of- way width of 70 feet, a street width of 44 feet, and planter strips, sidewalks and other improvements, and Residential Streets such as SE 202"d Street should have a right-of-way width of 50 feet, a street width of 28 feet, and planter strips, sidewalks and other improvements Currently, 92"d Avenue South has a right-of- way width of approximately 66 feet and a street width of 22 to 24 feet The street ' accommodates two narrow lanes of traffic but does not include the required improvements Southeast 202"d Street is in a similar condition It has a right-of- Findings, Conclusions & Recommendation Heanng Examiner for City of Kent , Sophia Glenn/Brenna's Vista /I Rezone #RZ-2005-1 KIVA #RPP4-2050146 Page 4 of 7 ' way width of approximately 40 feet and a street width of 22 feet, and lacks the ibquired improvements. Exhibit 1, Staff Report, page 4. 10. Future development of the subject property would require mitigation of impacts to the street system, including street widening along the property frontage and payment of transportation mitigation fees. Exhibit 1, Staff Report, pages 5 & 10, Exhibit 1, Attachment A, Response to Criteria. ' 11. Water and sewer service are available to serve the subject property. The Applicant obtained certificates of water and sewer availability from the Soos Creek Water & Sewer District on December 7, 2004. Exhibit 1, Attachment A, Certificate of Water Availability and Certificate of Sewer Availability. 12. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), the City of Kent acted as lead agency for review of environmental impacts caused by the proposal The City issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for the rezone on September 7, 2005. Additional environmental review would be required once specific development is proposed Exhibit 1, Staff Report, page 3, Exhibit 1, Attachment E. 13. Notice of the open record hearing was posted on the property, mailed to properties within 300 feet of the site and published in King County Journal in accordance with City ordinances Exhibit 1, Attachment C CONCLUSIONS Jurisdiction The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction to hold an open record hearing on this quasi- judicial rezone and to issue a written recommendation for final action to the Council, pursuant to RCW 35A 63 170 and Chapters 2 32 and 15 09 of the Kent City Code. Criteria for Review ' Section 15 09 050(C) of the Kent Zoning Code sets forth the standards and criteria the Hearing Examiner must use to evaluate a request for a rezone. A request for a rezone shall only be granted if. a. The proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, b. The proposed rezone and subsequent development of the site would be compatible with development in the vicinity, Findings, Conclusions & Recommendation ' Hearing Examiner for City of Kent Sophia Glenn/Brenna's Vista 11 Rezone #RZ-2005-1 KIVA #RPP4-2050146 Page 5 of 7 i C. The proposed rezone will not unduly burden the transportation system in the vicinity of the property with significant adverse impacts which cannot be mitigated; d. Circumstances have changed substantially since the establishment of the current , zoning district to warrant the proposed rezone; e. The proposed rezone will not adversely affect the health, safety and general , welfare of the citizens of the City of Kent Conclusions based on Findings 1. The proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The ' proposed rezone would increase density slightly and thus help obtain the housing goals of the city, the housing is in an area where road access is available, and the densities permitted under the new zoning would encourage a variety of , housing types. Findings Nos 3 and 5. 2. The proposed rezone and subsequent development of the site would be compatible with development in the vicinity. Existing and authorized land uses in the vicinity of the site are residential With the proposed rezone, the development potential of the subject property would be similar to that of adjacent properties to the east. However, the full development potential of 135 dwelling units would likely not be realized on the site Future development of the subject property would require mitigation of off-site impacts. Findings Nos. 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, and 12. 3. The proposed rezone would not unduly burden the transportation system in the vicinity of the property with significant adverse impacts which cannot be mitigated. Mitigation requirements would be established when specific development is proposed. Findings Nos. 9, 10, and 12. ' 4 Circumstances have changed substantially since the establishment of the current zoning district. The recently adopted Critical Areas Ordinance allows , for development of steep slopes if a detailed geotechnical review concludes that development can occur without adverse impacts, thus allowing higher-density residential development of the subject property. Finding No 7 ' 4. The proposed rezone would not adversely affect the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Kent. The proposed rezone does , not represent a significant change from existing zoning Allowed land uses under both zoning designations are exclusively residential Utilities are available to serve the site No adverse impacts were identified during the environmental ' Findings, Conclusions & Recommendation Hearing Examiner for City of Kent ' Sophia Glenn/Brenna's Vista II Rezone #RZ-2005-1 KIVA #RPP4-2050146 Page 6 of 7 ' t i review process that cannot be mitigated at the time a specific development / proposal is submitted. Ftndings Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4''8, 10, 11, and 12. ■ RECOMMENDATION Based upon the preceding Findings and Conclusions, the Hearing Examiner recommends that the application for a rezone of King County Tax Parcel Nos. 062205- ' 9025, 062205-9007, 062205-9034, and 062205-9045 from SR-4 5 to SR-6 be APPROVED. DATED this 19th day of October 2005. THEODORE PAUL HUNTER Hearing Examiner ch S\Permit\Plan\rezone\2005\2050146-2005-1FINDINGS doc Findings, Conclusions & Recommendation Hearing Examiner for City of Kent Sophia Glenn/Brenna's Vista 11 Rezone #RZ-2005-1 KIVA #RPP4-2050146 Page 7 of 7 Kent City Council Meeting Date December 13, 2005 Category Bids L 1. SUBJECT: KENT SENIOR CENTER UPGRADES 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: The bid opening was held on December 1, 2005, with five (5) bids received. The apparent low bid was submitted by Flag Construction Company, Inc in the amount of$423,456 00 for base bid, excluding Washington State Sales Tax (WSST). The Parks Director recommends awarding the bid to Flag Construction Company, Inc. to complete the Kent Senior Upgrade Project in the amount of$423,456, plus WSST 3. EXHIBITS: Bid tab 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Parks Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc ) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? X Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes X No If no: Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $ Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund Amount $ 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds authorizing the Mayor to enter into an agreement with Flag Construction Company, Inc to complete the Senior Center Upgrade Project for the base bid amount of$423,456 00, plus Washington State Sales Tax. jDISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 8A l l CITY OF KENT PARKS FACILITIES BID TAB December 1, 2005 lPROJECT: Kent Senior Center Upgrade BIDDER Flag Construction Company, Inc $423,456.00 Deductive Bid Alternate #1 - $ 40,000 00 Deductive Bid Alternate #2 - $ 12,000.00 lTriple D Construction, Inc. $436,780 00 Deductive Bid Alternate #1 -$ 48,127.00 Deductive Bid Alternate #2 - $ 13,608 00 Roy E Dunham Company $459,600.00 Deductive Bid Alternate #1 -$ 48,500 00 Deductive Bid Alternate #2 -$ 11,600 00 Lincoln Construction, Inc $462,300.00 Deductive Bid Alternate #1 - $ 60,000 00 Deductive Bid Alternate #2 - $ 12,500 00 United Pacific Structures, Inc. $502,000 00 Deductive Bid Alternate #1 - $ 48,000 00 Deductive Bid Alternate #2 - $ 10,000 00 REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES AND STAFF A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT V cQ IV►Te/iQ/Y�C 2_ °� V o Lty% B. OPERATIONS OMMITTEE 1ta-,,k 7 of C. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE