The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity Council Meeting - City Council Meeting - 11/05/2024 (3) Approved Kent City Council • City Council Regular Meeting KENT Minutes WAS M IN G 7 0 N November 5, 2024 Date: November 5, 2024 Time: 5:00 p.m. Place: Chambers 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE Mayor Ralph called the meeting to order. 2. ROLL CALL Attendee Name Status Arrived Dana Ralph mayor Present Satwinder Kaur Council President Present Bill Boyce Councilmember Present John Boyd Councilmember Present Brenda Fincher Councilmember Remote Marli Larimer Councilmember Present Toni Troutner Councilmember Present Zandria Michaud Councilmember Present 3. AGENDA APPROVAL A. I move to approve the agenda as presented. RESULT: MOTION PASSES [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Satwinder Kaur, Council President SECONDER: Bill Boyce, Councilmember AYES: Kaur, Boyce, Boyd, Fincher, Larimer, Troutner, Michaud 4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A. Public Recognition i. Employee of the Month Mayor Ralph recognized Police Corrections Officer, Michael Anderson as the November Employee of the Month. B. Community Events Council President Kaur announced upcoming events at the accesso ShoWare Center. Councilmember Fincher announced upcoming Spotlight Series events. Kent City Council City Council Regular Meeting November 5, 2024 Minutes Kent, Washington S. REPORTS FROM COUNCIL AND STAFF A. Mayor Ralph's Report Mayor Ralph provided details regarding today's Coffee and Conversations with the Mayor and indicated she was joined by Covington Mayor Jeff Wagner. B. Chief Administrative Officer's Report Chief Administrative Officer, Pat Fitzpatrick advised his report is included in today's agenda packet. C. Councilmembers' Reports Council President Kaur advised today's Committee of the Whole meeting is available online. Kaur advised the Association of Washington Cities is working on legislative priorities. Councilmember Boyce talked about the Public Safety items on today's Committee of the Whole agenda. Councilmember Boyd announced recent events held by the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority. Councilmember Fincher talked about the King Conservation District's plant sale and free classes. 6. PUBLIC HEARING None. 7. PUBLIC COMMENT None. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Satwinder Kaur, Council President SECONDER: Bill Boyce, Councilmember AYES: Kaur, Boyce, Boyd, Fincher, Larimer, Troutner, Michaud A. Approval of Minutes i. Council Workshop - Workshop Regular Meeting - Oct 15, 2024 5:15 PM ii. City Council Meeting - City Council Regular Meeting - Oct 15, 2024 7:00 PM ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Page 2 of 6 Kent City Council City Council Regular Meeting November 5, 2024 Minutes Kent, Washington B. Payment of Bills - Approve MOTION: I move to approve the payment of bills received through 9/30/24 and paid on 9/30/34, and approve the checks issued for payroll 9/16/24 - 9/30/24 and paid on 10/5/24, all audited by the Committee of the Whole on 10/15/24. C. Write-offs of Uncollectable Accounts - Authorize MOTION: I move to authorize the Mayor to write-off uncollectable accounts owed to the City in the amount of $74,232.26, subject to final approval of the Finance Director. D. Agreement with Dynamic Language Center, LTD for ARPA- Funded Document Translation Services - Authorize MOTION: I move to authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement with Dynamic Language Center, LTD for document translation services, subject to final terms acceptable to the Chief Administrative Officer and City Attorney. E. Cooperative Purchasing Agreement - Angel Armor, LLC - Authorize MOTION: I move to authorize the Police Chief to purchase law enforcement equipment through a cooperative purchasing agreement the state Department of Enterprise Services has with Angel Armor, LLC, if those purchases are within the City's established budgets and made during the term of the cooperative contract, including any authorized extensions. F. Easement to Puget Sound Energy at the Kent East Hill Operations Center (KEHOC) - Authorize MOTION: I move to authorize the Mayor to sign the Easement Agreement with Puget Sound Energy, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the Public Works Director and City Attorney. 9. OTHER BUSINESS City Attorney, Tammy White provided an overview of the Rezone Quasi- Judicial process. Deja No one was signed up to provide public testimony Kaur moved, boyce seconded admitting the Quasi-Judicial Hearing Appearance of Fairness Disclosure Statements into the record. ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Page 3 of 6 Kent City Council City Council Regular Meeting November 5, 2024 Minutes Kent, Washington I move to admit the Quasi-Judicial Disclosure Statements submitted by the Councilmembers into the record for this quasi-judicial matter. RESULT: MOTION PASSES [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Satwinder Kaur, Council President SECONDER: Bill Boyce, Councilmember AYES: Kaur, Boyce, Boyd, Fincher, Larimer, Troutner, Michaud A. Parayil Rezone Ordinance - Adopt City Attorney, Tammy White provided an overview of the rezone of 3.56 acres of property, located at off of Canyon Drive from MR-D (Duplex Multifamily Residential District) to MRT-16 (Multi-Family Residential Townhouse District). White advised the property is owned by Parayil, LLC and the applicant filing the rezone request is Babu Parayil. When the matter was before the hearing examiner, no one spoke in opposition to the rezone request. • An open record hearing was previously held before the Hearing Examiner on October 2, 2024. Public notice of that hearing was given as required by the Kent City Code, which staff will explain in their presentation. After the hearing, the Hearing Examiner recommended Council approve the rezone request, and it is that recommendation before you tonight for consideration and, if you agree with the Hearing Examiner, adoption of the implementing ordinance. • Because this matter would change the zoning on a specific parcel of property, it is considered a "quasi-judicial matter". • Typically, Council sits as a legislative body where it develops policy for the City. • On legislative matters, outside influences can and often do help shape Council's policy decisions. • However, in a quasi-judicial matter, Council sits as a panel of judges determining the legal rights of specific parties by applying previously developed policy to a particular property in a hearing or other proceeding. • When it is applying policy (as opposed to developing it), Council must be impartial, fair, and free from outside influences. • To help insure fairness and impartiality in quasi-judicial matters, the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine was developed through the courts and later codified into state law at Ch. 42.36 RCW. • Before tonight's Council meeting, each Council Member completed an Appearance of Fairness Disclosure Statement and provided that statement to me or the City Clerk. • I have reviewed those disclosure statements. All Council Members advised (1) they did not have any ex parte communication with any proponent or opponent to the rezone request, (2) they do not have any personal interest ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Page 4 of 6 Kent City Council City Council Regular Meeting November 5, 2024 Minutes Kent, Washington in the proposed rezone, and (3) they are able to consider the rezone request fairly and impartially. White asked the audience if any had a lawful basis to ask for the recusal of a council member due to the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine. There were no responses. Planner, Delai Mitchell provided the staff presentation. The MRT-16 zoning district is consistent with the existing Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation of LDMF - Low Density Multifamily. Both the existing zoning designation of MR-D and the proposed MR-T16 are allowed zoning designations for the LDMF land use under the City's Comprehensive Plan. The property under MRT-16 zoning would remain compatible with the existing development in the vicinity. Abutting the Parayil property are five apartment complexes, a church, one condominium building, and one single- family home. The existing zoning in the area includes MR-M, MR-D, SR-6, and MR-T16, all of which are residential zones. Kent City Code 15.09.050 establishes five criteria for granting a request for rezone which help ensure consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, nearby land uses, and available infrastructure and services. After conducting an open record public hearing on October 2, 2024, the hearing examiner recommended the Parayil rezone application be approved. City planning staff agree with the hearing examiner's recommendation and recommend Council accept it. There was nobody signed up to provide comment and no comments were received. MOTION: I move to accept the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Hearing Examiner on the Parayil rezone application and to adopt Ordinance No. 4499, approving the Parayil rezone application from MR-D (Duplex Multifamily Residential District) to MRT-16 (Multi-Family Residential Townhouse District). RESULT: MOTION PASSES [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Satwinder Kaur, Council President SECONDER: Bill Boyce, Councilmember AYES: Kaur, Boyce, Boyd, Fincher, Larimer, Troutner, Michaud 10. BIDS None. 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION AND ACTION AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Page 5 of 6 Kent City Council City Council Regular Meeting November 5, 2024 Minutes Kent, Washington None. 12. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Ralph adjourned the meeting. Meeting ended at 5:25 p.m. Kf4vi l Ley A. Ko v wto- City Clerk ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Page 6 of 6 QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Please return this form to the City Clerk Prior to the Hearing Council Meeting Date:_ _November 5, 2024 _ Agenda Item No: Other Business - A Title: Parayil Rezone Ordinance - Adapt Type of Quasi-Judicial Hearing: Rezone Property Location: Canyon Rd/Summit Ave. Property Owner: Parayil. LLC Applicant: Babu Parayil Applicant Representative: Babu Parayil Application Date: May 2, 2024 Opponent(s) of Rezone: None to date A rezone request is set on your agenda at the above-referenced Council meeting for you to consider changing the zoning designation of the listed property. Typically, as a City Councilmember, you sit as a member of the legislative body and make policy decisions for the City, However, a rezone is considered a quasi-judicial matter, In quasi-judicial matters, you act as a member of a panel of judges to determine the rights of a property owner. Washington's Appearance of Fairness Doctrine, found in Chapter 42.36 RCW, applies to a quasi- judicial rezone. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine is intended to ensure that a quasi- judicial decision of the Council is fair and unbiased in both appearance and in fact. In order to ensure compliance with the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine, please answer the following questions by placing an "x" after "Yes" or "No": 1. Between the date the rezone application was submitted (see above) and today, have you had any communication (verba,V�nritten/text/email, etc,) with any proponent or opponent of the rezone? Yes No;�_ a. If the answer is "no", please move to the next question. b. If the answer is "yes": i. You are required, at the Council meeting, to place on the record the substance of that communication; and ii. Any member of the public is permitted to rebut the substance of the communication at the Council meeting, _ 2. Are you employed by, or own any bin nterest in, a business of any proponent or any opponent to this rezone? Yes No: 3. Is there a chance that you sta"_ financially gain from the approval or denial of this rezone? For example, do you ow i -i"nterest in property or a business on or in close proximity to this property? Yes No: i, If yes, will property that you have an ownership interes in inch ase or decrease in value as a result of the outcome of this rezone? Yes No. 4. Do you have a familial, so ial, ox-employment relationship with any proponent or opponent of this rezone? Yes No: 5. Are you aware of anythi -t g th -may impact your ability to consider this matter fairly and impartially? Yes No: An answer of "yes" to question 1 will not disqualify a member of Council from proceeding if the contact is disclosed and rebuttalperrxu Ana suer of"yes" to any of the questions in 2- may cause disqualification depeV�hg on the c ii e Signature of Councilmember: Date: I QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Please return this form to the City Clerk Prior to the Hearing Council Meeting Date: November 5, 2g24 Agenda Item No: Other Business_- A Title: Parayil Rezone Ordinance_-_Adopt Type of Quasi-Judicial Hearing: Rezone Property Location: Canyon Rd mmitAve._ Property Owner: Para it LLC Applicant: Babu Paray0 - Applicant Representative:_ E3abu Rarayi1 Application Date: May 2, 2024 _ _ Opponent(s) of Rezone: None to date A rezone request is set can your agenda at the above-referenced Council meeting for you to consider changing the zoning designation of the listed property. Typically, as a City Councilmember, you sit as a member of the legislative body and make policy decisions for the City. However, a rezone is considered a quasi-judicial matter. In quasi-judicial matters, you act as a member of a panel of judges to determine the rights of a property owner. Washington's Appearance of Fairness Doctrine, found in Chapter 42.35 RCW, applies to a quasi- judicial rezone. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine is intended to ensure that a quasi- judicial decision of the Council is fair and unbiased in both appearance and in fact. In order to ensure compliance with the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine, please answer the following questions by placing an "x" after "Yes" or "No": 1. Between the date the rezone application was submitted (see above) and today, have you had any communication (verbal/written text/email, etc,) with any proponent or opponent of the rezone? Yes No: a. If the answer is no", please move to the next question. b. If the answer is "yes": i. You are required, at the Council meeting, to place on the record the substance of that communication; and ii. Any member of the public is permitted to rebut the substance of the communication at the Council meeting. 2. Are you employed by, or own any business interest in, a business of any proponent or any opponent to this rezone? Yes . No: X. 3. Is there a chance that YOU stand to financially gain from the approval or denial of this rezone? For example, do you own an interest in property or a business on or in close proximity to this property? Yes No: Y__ i. If yes, will property that you have an ownership interest in increase or decrease in value as a result of the outcome of this rezone? Yes No: 4, Do you have a familial, soci I, or employment relationship with any proponent or opponent of this rezone? Yes No: 5. Are you aware of anything that may impact your ability to consider this matter fairly and impartially? Yes _ No:X . An answer of "yes" to question 1 will not disqualify a member of Council from proceeding if the contact is disclosed and rebuttal is pet itted, An answer of"yes' to any of the questions in 2-5 may cause disqualification depending on ' _c Lances. Signature of Councilmember: �' Date: �� S �� QUASI-)UDICIAL HEARING APPEARANCE of FAIRNESS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Please return this farm to the City Clerk Prior to the Hearing Agenda Item No: OtheL3-"laUL-= ---g Date a Council Meeting v Type of Quasi-Judicial Hearing:. Rezones ❑ Title: YJ113�Z9Allo �� 7 V) a Property location:_ 4LL��j Property owner - a �� d Applicant: Applicant Representative: Baba Faravil __ a n Application Date:. May 2,2a24 N �_ _ opponent(S) of Rezone:__ one t4 a m A rezone request is set on your agenda at the above-referenced Council meeting for you to consider au changing the zoning designation of the listed property. Typically, as a City Counciimember, you sit S as a member of the legislative body and make policy decisions far the City. However, a rezone is considered a quasi-judicial matter. In quasi-judicial matters, you act as a member of a panel of o _ C judges to determine the rights of a property owner. ° w Washington's Appearance of Fairness Doctrine, found in Chapter 42,36 RCW, app leas to a quasi- cc judicial rezone. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine is intended to ensure that a quasi- 0' judicial decision of the Council is fair and unbiased in both appearance and in fact. a. In order to ensure compliance with the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine, please answer the following LO questions by placing an"x" after"Yes"or"No": m Between the date the rezone application was submitted (see above) and today, have you had e ny communication (verbal/written/text/ernail, etc.) with any proponent or ❑pponent of the v N ezone?Yes No: _i)(- o If the answer is"no", please move to the next question. w If the ansv�er is"yes": E i. you are required, at the Council meeting, to place on the record the substance of that communication; and 0 si. Any member of the public is permitted to rebut the substance of the communication at � the Council meeting. c y ' re you employed by, or own any business Interest In, a business of any proponent or any ponerrt tv this rezone?Yes No; s there a chance that you stand to financially gain from the approval or denial of this rezone? a 7 exarnp14, do you own an interest in property or a business on or in close proximit}• to this R. perty?Yes_ No. ) a3 +. If yes,will property that you have an ownership lnterest in increase or decrease in value as a resrllt of tfre outrr)rne of this rezone?Yeses.., No; Qu you have a 4arnilial, so:I I, ,� Nnrployment relationship Nrlti% Oily proponent or opporrerrt or a NU : .. Are you aware of anything fiat nray impact your apillty to consider this matter fairly and C t ns �r y(.'y4s"..to quc;stlpn 3 vrNl not disqualify a nlen1bQr' of'Coungll from proceeding if the d' ac s:00c1950 an¢rebuttal Is permitted. An•8nswer of"yes"io any of the questions in 2-S;irdy dlsqualifl lion ependinq (in Lhe rcurnsta ges Is}ature'of Councilmertl�Cr: t f �J r ate;' Cr �7` QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Please return this form to the City Clerk Prior to the Hearing Council Meeting Date: November 5, 2824 Agenda Item No: ❑ther Business A Title. Para it Rezone ❑rdinance - Adopt Type of Quasi-Judicial Hearing: Rezone Property Location: Canyon Rd Summit Ave. Property Owner: Para i! LLC Applicant: Baru Para it Applicant Representative: Babu Parayll Application Date: May 2, 2824 Opponent(s) ❑f Rezone: None to date A rezone request is set on your agenda at the above-referenced Council meeting for you to consider changing the zoning designation of the listed property. Typically, as a City Councilmember, you sit as a member of the legislative body and make policy decisions for the City. However, a rezone is considered a quasi-judicial matter. In quasi-judicial matters, you act as a member of a panel of judges to determine the rights of a property owner, Washington's Appearance ❑f Fairness Doctrine, found in Chapter 42.36 RCW, applies to a quasi- judicial rezone. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine is intended to ensure that a quasi- judicial decision of the Council is fair and unbiased in both appearance and in fact. In order to ensure compliance with the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine, please answer the following questions by placing an "x" after "Yes" ❑r "No": 1. Between the date the rezone application was submitted (see agave) and today, have you had any communication (verbal/written/text/email, etc.) with any proponent or opponent of the rezone? Yes No: a. If the answer is "no", please move to the next question. b. If the answer is "yes": i. You are required, at the Council meeting, to place on the retard the substance of that communication; and ii. Any member of the public is permitted to rebut the substance of the communication at the Council meeting. 2. Are you employed by, or own any business interest in, a business of any proponent or any opponent to this rezone? Yes No: _x 3. Is there a chance that you stand to financially gain from the approval or denial of this rezone? For example, do you own an interest in property ❑r a business on or in close proximity to this property? Yes No: _x i. If yes, wi#I property that you have an ownership interest in increase or decrease in value as a result of the outcome of this rezone? Yes No: 4. ❑o you have a familial, social, or employment relationship with any proponent or opponent of this rezone? Yes No: x 5. Are you aware of anything that may impact your ability to consider- this matter fairly and impartially? Yes No: x_ An answer of "yes" to question 1 will not disqualify a member of Council from proceeding if the contact is disclosed and rebuttal is permitted. An answer of"yes" to any of the questions in 2-5 may cause disqualification depending on tlq circumstances. IM SiOnature of Councilmember: Date: _111512024 QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Please return this form to the City Clerk Prior to the Hearing Council Meeting Date: November 5 2024 Agenda Item No: Other Business - A Title: Para it Rezone Ordinance - Adopt Type of Quasi-Judicial Hearing: Rezone Property Location: Canyon RdlSummit Ave. Property Owner: Parayil, LLC Applicant: Babu Para it Applicant Representative: Sabu Parayil Application Date: May 2 2024 Opponent(s) of Rezone: None to date A rezone request is set on your agenda at the above-referenced Council meeting for you to consider changing the zoning designation of the listed property. Typically, as a City Councilmember, you sit as a member of the legislative body and make policy decisions for the City. However, a rezone is considered a quasi-judicial matter. In quasi-judicial matters, you act as a member of a panel of judges to determine the rights of a property owner. Washington's Appearance of Fairness Doctrine, found in Chapter 42.36 RCW, applies to a quasi- judicial rezone. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine is intended to ensure that a quasi- judicial decision of the Council is flair and unbiased in both appearance and in fact. In order to ensure compliance with the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine, please answer the following questions by placing an "x" after"Yes" or "No": 1. Between the date the rezone application was submitted (see above) and today, have you had any communication (verbal/written/text/email, etc.) with any proponent or opponent of the rezone? Yes No: XX a. If the answer is "no", please move to the next question. b. If the answer is "yes"; i. You are required, at the Council meeting, to place on the record the substance of that communication; and i1. Any member of the public is permitted to rebut the substance of the communication at the Council meeting. 2. Are you employed by, or own any business interest in, a business of any proponent or any opponent to this rezone? Yes No: XX 3. Is there a chance that you stand to financially gain from the approval or denial of this rezone? For example, do you own an interest in property or a business on or in close proximity to this property? Yes No: XX i. If yes, will property that you have an ownership interest in increase or decrease in value as a result of the outcome of this rezone? Yes No: 4, Do you have a familial, social, or employment relationship with any proponent or opponent of this rezone? Yes No: XX 5. Are you aware of anything that may impact your ability to consider this matter fairly and impartially? Yes No: XX An answer of "yes" to question 1 will not disqualify a member of Council from proceeding if the contact is disclosed and rebuttal is permitted. An answer of"yes"to any of the questions in 2-5 may cause disqualification depending on the circumstances. Signature of Councilmember: _Marli Larirner Date: _11/4/2024 QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Please return this form to the City Clerk Prior to the Hearing Council Meeting Date: November 5 2024 Agenda Item No: Other Business - A Title: Para it Rezone Ordinance - Adopt Type of Quasi-Judicial Hearing: Rezone Property Location: Canyon RdlSummit Ave. Property Owner: Para it LLC Applicant: Babu Para it Applicant Representative., Babu Para ii Application Date: May 2, 2024 Opponent(s) of Rezone: None to date A rezone request is set on your agenda at the above-referenced Council meeting for you to consider changing the zoning designation of the listed property. Typically, as a City Councilmember, you sit as a member of the legislative body and make policy decisions for the City. However, a rezone is considered a quasi-judicial matter. In quasi-judicial matters, you act as a member of a panel of judges to determine the rights of a property owner. Washington's Appearance of Fairness Doctrine, found in Chapter 42.36 RCW, applies to a quasi- judicial rezone. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine is intended to ensure that a quasi- judicial decision of the Council is fair and unbiased in both appearance and in fact. In order to ensure compliance with the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine, please answer the following questions by placing an "x" after "Yes" or "No": 1, Between the date the rezone application was submitted (see above) and today, have you had any communication (verbal/written/text/email, etc.) with any proponent or opponent of the rezone? Yes No: _x! a. If the answer is "no", please move to the next question. b. If the answer is "yes": i. You are required, at the Council meeting, to place on the record the substance of that communication; and ii. Any member of the public is permitted to rebut the substance of the communication at the Council meeting. 2. Are you employed by, or own any business interest in, a business of any proponent or any opponent to this rezone? Yes No: ._x—. 3. Is there a chance that you stand to financially gain from the approval or denial of this rezone? For example, do you own an interest in property or a business on or in close proximity to this property? Yes No: _x i. If yes, will property that you have an ownership interest in increase or decrease in value as a result of the outcome of this rezone? Yes No: _x 4. Do you have a familial, social, or employment relationship with any proponent or opponent of this rezone? Yes No: _x 5. Are you aware of anything that may impact your ability to consider this matter fairly and impartially? Yes No: _x An answer of "yes" to question 1 will not disqualify a member of Council from proceeding if the contact is disclosed and rebuttal is permitted. An answer of"yes" to ny of the questions in 2-5 may cause disqualification depending on mstances. Signature of Councilmember: Date: II./4/24 QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Please return this form to the City Clerk Prior to the Hearing Council Meeting Date: November 5 024 Agenda Item No: Other Business - A Title: Para it Rezone Ordinance - Adopt Type of Quasi-Judicial Hearing. Rezone Property Location: Canyon Rd Summit Ave. Property Owner: Para it LLC Applicant: Babu Para ii Applicant Representative: Babu Parayi# Application Date: May 2 2024 Opponent(s) of Rezone: None to date A rezone request is set on your agenda at the above-referenced Council meeting for you to consider changing the zoning designation of the listed property. Typically, as a City Councilmember, you sit as a member of the legislative body and make policy decisions for the City. However, a rezone is considered a quasi-judicial matter. In quasi-judicial matters, you act as a member of a panel of judges to determine the rights of a property owner. Washington's Appearance of Fairness Doctrine, found in Chapter 42.36 RCW, applies to a quasi- judicial rezone. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine is intended to ensure that a quasi- judicial decision of the Council is fair and unbiased in both appearance and in fact. In order to ensure compliance with the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine, please answer the following questions by placing an "x" after "Yes" or "No": 1. Between the date the rezone application was submitted (see above) and today, have you had any communication (verbal/written/text/email, etc.) with any proponent or opponent of the rezone? Yes No: X_ a. If the answer is "no", please move to the next question. b. If the answer is `eyes": i. You are required, at the Council meeting, to place on the record the substance of that communication; and J. Any member of the public is permitted to rebut the substance of the communication at the Council meeting. 2. Are you employed by, or own any business interest in, a business of any proponent or any opponent to this rezone? Yes _ No: 3. Is there a chance that you stand to financially gain from the approval or denial of this rezone? For example, do you own an interest in property or a business on or in close proximity to this property? Yes — No: X i. If yes, will property that you have an ownership interest in increase or decrease in value as a result of the outcome of this rezone? Yes _ No: 4. Do you have a familial, social, or employment relationship with any proponent or opponent of this rezone? Yes No: 5. Are you aware of anythin that may impact your ability to consider this matter Fairly and impartially? Yes — No: V An answer of "yes" to question 1 will not disqualify a member of Council from proceeding if the contact is disclosed and rebuttal is permitted. An answer of"yes" to any of the questions in 2-5 may cause disqualification depending on the circumstances. Signature of Councilmember: u Y � Date: `Z - t 2os 4 dG4 4?224 4?329 apt i „ 1. -- ' ."°. 4 11 fi \L 4?4419 � �3& �1a4 .r. �,2pe f 440 �009 ,24447 <. AMU > ��as Mass *i3se � ro � } ¢ I and St ¢ IS � rasa v+ '��7 F • . � � r., �k91 1354 �356 sFri +" � �� '� d •`. 4 kg SCALE- I' = ]aa WAY SUBJECT PARCELS AFFECTED PARCELS AND & SURR❑UNDING PR❑PERTIES • A, tL ii L L 1% •� I 4� a 174s 4 i344 9229 ;9324 ; ` } ' MPT-16 37 'S F H 302 JR. . A s}as � � MR-M MR-M CHURCH 3 - 1 -UNI 4p—LJIYII 25 f J QThiT MR-0 �.o APARTMENT _ MR-M 5 9P � 28-UNIT Jaa '`AT . rill •�� ~•#+ ••`+ I ,g°' CONDD r ACAOOOO LAN , ` 0, O 5-1 ai •� ,MIS-I] VACANT LAND MR-D CHURCH .+ �; �l�I MR- APT T r ± 14 MR—D ��4 MR—D bass MR-D 13- NIT 61-UNIT VACANT FH MT CONDO LAND'land 5t MR-1 rnLX;�r'%, i ` ;rasa _Y J� .f MR-D 1256 VACANT 'i rYL , 254 LAND i 61. �• �x+� �fyyU - - 4 I SUBJECT PARCELS