Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Meeting - City Council Workshop - 06/04/2024 (3) Approved City Council Workshop • Workshop Regular Meeting KENT Minutes WAS M IN G 7 0 N June 4, 2024 Date: June 4, 2024 Time: 5:15 p.m. Place: Chambers I. CALL TO ORDER Attendee Name Titl Status Arrived Satwinder Kaur Council President Present Bill Boyce Councilmember Present John Boyd Councilmember Present Brenda Fincher Councilmember Present Marli Larimer Councilmember Present Zandria Michaud Councilmember Present Toni Troutner Councilmember Late 5:27 PM II. PRESENTATIONS 1 Traffic Calming Update Erik Preston 45 MIN. Engineer, Honey Maria presented the Residential Traffic Calming Program (RTCP) update to the Council. The RTCP continues to address livability concerns in the City of Kent's neighborhoods. It gives residents a formal process to bring their concerns about speeding and cut-through traffic on residential streets to the attention of the City. Maria detailed program statistics from 2018 - present (185), talked about closed requests and those awaiting a traffic study. Since the 2023 update to Council, the City has: 22 new requests received 15 studies evaluated 11 studies scheduled 1 study qualified 20 studies closed out 5 Post-installation studies Maria talked about the public process and detailed neighborhood meeting information, provided statistics on current projects, including those in construction, and post installation studies. City Council Workshop Workshop Regular June 4, 2024 Meeting Kent, Washington Minutes ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._............................................................................................................................................................................................................... In April 2022 Council lowered the required response rate from residents supporting an application for a RTCP from 50% to 33%. And the approval rate from 67% to 55%. Since then 5 of 10 ballots have failed, all 5 below the minimum return rate of 33%. Only 1 was below the minimum Approval Rate of 55%. Unintended consequences: We have had several individuals tell us that they would vote NO, but knew they were outnumbered and would purposely NOT vote in hopes the minimum return rate was not met. Meeting ended at 5:34 p.m. K�w�le,y A. Ko-wwta- City Clerk ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Page 2 of 2 _ _� it z _. � ,yF, ,,�,-,� � ^. � -r �.__.. ,�,. 'tl,� �� ?. s' y� s`� " "�,�v- yam, �``..�t iR:, <#,�' 3.sa e � � � � .�y� .. ,�+ ,,. _.d ,� `�'� .� .. � � - y,� x �, ,. y� `a,�. ��."Mgr �'����_ � `w,� - �� - �,,� _ � '^� � _:s �,. �- it- m � s � `,', t ,_ f r: �� .y a, !� y '' '°ham � '""".�', �.> � �^� �. .� 1 , I ^f:. .'3A� ; ya,-+Y - ..n.!,,+ylP!��,n�!l�iu n., '`v,� wc,. xw �..d � :,n "� — F �a - �' - - - �� .;,,a,. .. _ _ I , I Criteria Passible Points Traffic.Sp-eadsl Lower than the posted speed 0 0 - 0.9 over 0 /M11111 1.0 - 1.9over 2 RTCF Step 2.0 - 2.9 over 3 3.0 - 3.9 over 9 4.0 - 4.9over 1� 5.0 - 5.9 Doer 23 6.0 - 6.9over 311 ■ 9,0 - .9over 6 8.0 - 8.9 over 47 Resident Request 4.0 - 9 4 .9over 6 10.0+ over 50 Average Dally Traffic (ADT) Counts ■ Neighborhood Support ( 5 + ) 0-400ADTt 1 401-600 ADT 5 601-800 ADT 10 Traffic Study 1,001 A ADT 15 ■ ir0oi+ ADT 20 Residential Collect�rCollecto • Scoring points) rDOI-10-1,000 ADT 5( 50 1501-2,000 ADT 1,501-2,000 ADT 10 2,001-2,500 AIDT 15 ■ Public MeetingCut -T oug ° Cut-Through Traffic Average Daily Traffic in one direction is 2.5 times 15 the other direction, Crash History 2 ■ Ballot property bamage Only/No Apparent Injury 3 rsosslble Injury 5 Mirror Injury 9 Serlous Injury 15 ■ Construction Pedet 30 �¢�tri$n Facilities No sidewalks 5 Sidewalks only on one side of the street 3 SidewdJks on both sides of the street 0 Park, Schaal (I{-12), or Transit Stop Street borders or features one of these 5 Street is on a designated school walk route 3 Not on e walk route tint within '!a mile of these 1 Month/Year RTCP Re uests er Month r r 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 January 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 February 1 1 4 2 0 0 0 March 6 4 5 3 5 1 0 April 4 4 4 1 2 0 1 20 requests in 2023 . June 6 2 5 6 2 2 1 1st Half 20 14 25 16 13 6 2 * 2 requests in 2024 . Jul 6 1 5 4 0 3 qAugust 3 1 3 4 6 8 September 0 3 7 6 1 2 October 4 1 4 1 2 0 November 2 0 1 2 2 0 December 1 2 0 0 0 1 Total 36 22 45 33 26 20 City of Kent Residential Traffic (2018 to Present) NE01W0 MW RoadCeriterLine gib• - � .i�� '� '•g /� lilt X N X 1. Ova vised May 28, 2024 2111 Ron m i I i Sm No lots ■N - + 'ti. ■ ��: r: ilk ���: - ' �x�•° �•-I Il,I _.�,,, � �.., ; two, tauWL MY .anm► * i FIm 0 T I - a III i i n r.� City of Kent Residential Traffic (2018 to Present) ' r RoaKenterune OW IF _ O .s w•1 �FJ1 . �i Er III■■ 1 w7* GCra { + 1 mpg moo '- A =� INS I ► 'r1 r ;r City of Kent rim- , ReSidential Traffic t; + rCalming Program I 111 f _■�M•�r (2018to rs no _ ■�. J r Fzffi �� ! ; �' ww _1 Fo'i � CA i I �r. � •"T� 4 a ro MEN .+dt•� +RlElm � lid :��. YL �I� yi ■ Elf P07PP.W kil IF rd - .III ■ ..��, City Residential TraffiC of 1110 Calming to ■ -rt �I VNINRevised May 28r 2024 LN - Owdu AE F+ w F ■ akas Iti. jig lamp t _ W � r ; .��v � 71�t � Jk• � • � y � � „� f mod. . ,� �� r - - s # T I I = City of Kent Calming Program (RTCP) RoadGenterune M���r ■ _ - i 1 MOM Iwo i tow- 2 l� L Y` 1OW Li M y I per; II 6116 I � s ■ # ' RR" ILL 11 i 1► fir' :� �. a Since our February 6 ., 2023 Update 'PA • 22 new requests received • 15 studies evaluated • 11 studies scheduled • 1 study qualified • 20 studies closed out • 5 Post- installation studies Speed Cushion at 144 Ave SE City of Kent lipResidential Traffic Calming Program (RTCP) Is (2018 to Present) RoadCerpterl-ine ............ N 0mill w r INN Revised May 26, 2024 Fin 3N lot p ►MJF. ■ 71 I'M Ni, Aj OR 9 ELL rya l will Program Status OEM Next Step - Public Process ,. • Neighborhood mailin s g • Remote ( Zoom ) and In - Person meetings ° Kk 3 Project Map s • Developaplan • 6 Speed Cushions - • 3 Raised Crosswalks • Mail - in ballot votin gb R rv....�m,�eaisw sores Prograr - Status • 10 meetings completed RTCP 18-005 SE 233-234 St Traffic Calming Proposal (132 Ave SE to the west end of the road) 11 Concept plans developedLO w z _ AL.'� _ - n v 4 Speed >Cushion -` Q 1M2 Q22$ 122#^ 12254 2' 1 ry ,• 15I: 1252 12s '�^ Q '� • 8 Ballots mailed -- SE 233 St,1644, :r :w r21FI 585 :1:[ w y p E + _ e'- rrafh[ Slie • 6 meetings are scheduled v ��sh° .� y C d• � -i•frb. - •if Cushion" M • �r .IY IN Q ',f!i llafrlc o. kr�., ie i, t.« `-•'.ism. .r .12L2122. 12L+1 t2[` 2� yi 2'.!112' 2:�1 �Ilf.e'. { .;h [ 11+..22Y 2`e 5E 234 St ,i m `'y �f► "R� a 5E 234 5t •r "� _�F - C. �f �•'iii x! asz W + - 25i96 a. Y - 12r e+iu._12+:sy ��:-. �{i� -'...�. ^_^?• .. � _ ., ..iak.�z.�'�i rm-1 2�- , Concept Plan of SE 233-234 St, 132 Ave SE to the west end of the road City of Kent Residential Traffic Calming Program (RTCP) (2018 to Present) 7 RoadCeriterLine � IN FJ S Im N N E - � � w r Revised May 28, 2024 Fin -1...lz Em 9AF M4 min IWE a SIM min Progr 10 kow* 1 Status • Construction Complete • Lake Meridian Corridor ( 144 Ave-263 St- � , 148 Ave) . • In Construction .. ... • S 254 St (Reith Rd to Lake Fenwick Rd) Y • SE 216 St ( 116 Ave SE to 124 Ave SE) Speed Cushion on S 254 St ma 4i. i OF 11 ���rill r •+ � wi IEEI1� "� ['• •� 7 EMI" ■ � �r.•1 ��.'� A h 1 NMI a .IG.t- • Residential Traffic Calming Program (RTCP) WIN City of Kent c (2018 to Present) s N maw, v _ jTim `_r -M p IN ',W. , I -97 JFIH r.�. ■ � {pnY �nr■ n i j■a >fy�11�� i'�II pA r ■ E James St - ■ Dost , Cedar St - ;� Hazel Ave 4 s"- a w• Speed * ,4.+., Before:33,2 mph Street + AFter:24.0 mph f Diff:-9.2 mph Name From To Before After Diff. % Diff. '-- '/oDiff:-27.7% . -a Avg Seed 27.2 18.0 -9.2 -33.8% Hazel Ave James St Smith St 85% Speed 33.2 24.0 -9.2 -27.7% E Tempe.ranrc St Volume/ADT 668 667 1 -1 1 -0.1% 1 U N a to F smith St - d -� y ti L SE?4OVI • • Fritz Ca - �-_ • iAt''�t- Fred , ever X s 0A4 t st o W ` i r w • ' mph 9 0 mph S 242nd Ct ' ro • o ■ Speed Speed st Speed --■ - . - mphf'744th 5i _r MGM f • ■ I _ I . mph L •� � _ � 1 � : • • • • •--• : 1 • :' • tier--- s.' - ° .. , �R , f y i Y Ja • • . .--. 1 •• • T 1 © Tinting To-Go • - R NorthCha n�!e'rkyjf 'M sne 85% Speed of . .--. : . 1 1 : . 1 ' . S:245tfi PI ® .70->245thIPI M I : ' • •--• • 1 �,� *�=7"bth Pt �h Pl ■ y C I tea• is r L . s ForM.,Oe k Apartments - t Huslwe ou,�;rs �C E Post Study x - r Speed a.r.. Before:32.7 mph After:28.0 mph y v Diff:-4.7 mph %Dill:-14.4% S 268 St . . U U fa 268 St no U C M 75 > > a S � - y Street Name From To Before After Diff. % Diff. Avg Speed 26.8 23.0 -3.8 -14.2% S 268 St Military 40 Ave S 85% Speed 32.7 28.0 -4.7 -14.4% Rd Volume 10% reduction sp�I�d ost - A re; . mph fle �kft�r;36 0 mph P ', ' �" A Diff:•1.2 mph A At W.Diff:-3,2% nsta at i o , Apccd Before:34.2 mph �. Al`ker:33.Q mph Dlft,-1.2 mph %Diff;-3,S"�a � • VT JJ Study Average 85% Speed Speed n _.fir._-__ • -4.2 -4.6 -w v. � .; A � r Scenic Hill "a pie Street Name From To Location Before After Diff. % Diff. - + Speed " •i �� l _ Guiberson North of Avg Speed 31.9 31.0 -0.9 -2.8% Before:a9.2 mph Reiten Rd Maple St Afti�r:�13.Q mph F St Chicago St 859/b Speed 37.2 36.0 -1.2 -3.2% Diff;-6,2 mph *•# , ��IF Speed Guiberson North of Avq SiDeed 28.9 28.0 -0.9 -3.1% °faDiff;-15.8°a �. ' BePre;39,a rnph Reiten Rd Maple St �- -`� Af#�r:��.� mph "'-• -- St Walnut St 85% Speed 34.2 33.0 -1.2 -3.5% Dlff:-7,5 mph Woodland East of AvgSpeed 32.7 29.0 -3.7 -11.3% 4aaiff--19.0°a Maple St Reiten Rd WayReiten Rd o o Speed 85 /o Speed 39.2 33.0 -6.2 -15.8 /o Before;36•7 mptr Speed 33.2 25.0 -8.2 -24.7% After;32.0 rnph 6 Woodland South of Avg �= Way 85 /o Maple St SE 267 St Maple St o o Dlff;-�,� rnph S 2�2 Pi � k P Speed 39.5 32.0 -7.5 -19.0 /o %piff;-12.$$' -- Bob Woodland Maple St SE 267 St North of Avg Speed 31.9 26.0 -5.9 -18.5% � � •_; _ Way S 262 PI 85% Speed 36.7 32.0 -4.7 -12.8% Woodland South of Avg Speed 32.6 27.0 -5.6 -17.2% S 261 Pi * -� rr; p F Ma le St SE 267 St { _ ti ' Way S 263 PI 85% Speed 37.7 31.0 -6.7 -17.8% Speed Wa 11300N!'17.7 Mph After:31.0 mph Diff;- .7 mph ' z - - �t�` -fir _- r t• Speed CushiGn (6) Raised CrosswA (1) umi * Traffic Island (1) r NDrth ,i �i Speed Postnsta at i,. on � y. .F �: 6eiorc;33.7 m hx y Diff--i].7 mph St t Y J Average 85% Volume r - , 5 Speed Speed Reduction � (-'- �-'"� �j x . -5.9 -6.5 17% to ; "�� { -20.0% -18.9% 33% , 7' C; ��-ry }_ `• {#` Lake Meridian Speec Sk-264 St Street Name From To Before After Diff. % Diff. f; Ae Bi�tor-e;34.5 Mph �' � After;2,)_o m h Speed .. Diff-5.6 mph AvgSpeed 29.5 23.0 -6.5 -22.0% q,�aiff:_i q6 , Be r;29. _3 mph 144 Ave SE SE 260 St SE 263 St � Afher;29.0 mph MDiff_-9.3 mph 85% Speed 33.7 27.0 -6.7 -19.9% f 1 - ' aD,ff'-24% a - - 0 Speed ,. f �.t♦ Yr fr�ilhead SE 263 St 144 Ave 148 Ave AvgSpeed 30.3 25.0 5.3 17.5 /o Bcfart;29.a rnph _ Parkin ti SE SE Di ff:- 4.0 mpn { .` t iiiiiA. 85% Speed 34.6 29.0 -5.6 -16.2% �Iff'-�' r''pf' 'E `6' tk+ ' Y,DifF' 17°ii .� a r' 148 Ave SE SE 264 St SE 267 St AvgS eed 31.2 25 -6.2 -19.90/0 , ;t� 85% Speed 38.3 29 -9.3 -24.3% ^�y Avg Speed 30.5 25 -5.5 -18.0% sk 148 Ave SE SE 267 St SE 270 St 1 , r .� 85% Speed 35.3 29 -6.3 -17.8% Speed - Befare'35-3 mph k '' Afher:29.a mph Diff:-6-3 mph A� Gaff'-18% It Lake Mendlan Beat Launch pay - Ballots ( since Apr ! 022 "Ji Lowered Response Rate from 50 % to 33 % Lowered Approval Rate from 67 % to 55 % 5 of 10 failed ( 500/o ) All 5 below minimum Return Rate of 33 % Only 1 below minimum Approval Rate of 55 % Unintended consequences ■ Ballots ( since Ap 2022 ) 2 failed with 30 % and 31 % return rates Streets with Apartments Voting result Ballots received Ballots returned 0/o Returned % Yes 1 0/6 N o 0/0 Apartments Fail - 30 93 Fail 1 25 19 84 1 ss Pass 4 26 55 is Pass 8U 46 52 Fail U 24 25 0 -3 1 S7 Pass ss 36 66 11:11:1 44 Pam r r 27 35 11 0 FillU 1 1 U 7 0 Faill 7 10 43 S7 91 ■ Ballots ( since Ap 2022 ) 2 failed with 30 % and 31 % return rates Streets with Apartments Voting result Ballots received Ballots returned 0/o Returned 0/6 Yes 1 0/6 N o 0/0 Apartments Fail - I 28 I 30 93 Fail 1 25 19 84 121 ss Pass 47 26 55 Os is I_I Pass 8U 46 52 U8 Fall 98 24 25 83 17 S 7 Pass s s 36 66 1 1_1 1_1 44 Pam r r 27 35 .-jU 11 0 Faill 49 1s 31 U 7 0 Faill 70 7 10 43 S7 91 ■ Ballots ( since Ap 2022 ) 2 failed with 30 % and 31 % return rates Streets with Apartments Voting result Ballots received Ballots returned lWoReturned 0/6 Yes I W-a N o Apartments Fail - 28 30 93 7 0 Pass 61_1 30 so 90 10 0 Fail 1 25 19 84 12 58 Pass 4-7 26 55 1s Pass 89 46 52 Jb 2 Fail 98 2 4 25 0 � 1 Pass 77 27 35 11 0 Fa I ll 49 is 31 U 7 0 FaIII 70 7 10 43 57 91 • Failed Ballots rF result Bal lots received Bal Io is retu rn ed Wo R eturned =r-o Yes % N o Wo Apartmerg is aiI 93 28 30 93 0 ail 132 25 19 84 12 58 ail 98 24 25 83 57 alI 49 is 31 93 - 0 ail 70 7 10 43 91