Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
4476
ORDINANCE NO. 4476 AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the Kent Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities Element to reflect a six-year plan for capital improvement projects, the six-year Capital Improvement Plan of the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority, and the six-year Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Auburn, Federal Way, and Highline School Districts (2024-2029). RECITALS A. The State Growth Management Act (GMA) requires the City to have a Capital Facilities Element within its Comprehensive Plan. To assure the Comprehensive Plans remain relevant and up to date, the GMA allows amendments to the capital facilities element of comprehensive plans concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a city budget, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130. B. The City of Kent has established procedures for amending the Comprehensive Plan in Chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code (KCC), allowing amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the City's budget. As part of these procedures the City Council may hold the public hearing instead of the Land Use and Planning Board as laid out in KCC 12.02.010. 1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Capital Facilities Element for 2024-2029 Capital Improvements C. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.070(3), the Capital Facilities Element must include a six-year plan that shows how the City will finance such capital facilities within projected funding capacities and identifies sources of funding for such purposes. D. The City of Kent Finance Department has submitted proposed amendments to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to identify a six-year plan for capital improvement projects, including costs and revenue sources. E. Pursuant to RCW 82.02.050, impact fees may be collected and spent only for the public facilities which are addressed by the City's Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. In order to collect fire impact fees to be spent by the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority (RFA), the City must adopt the RFA's Capital Improvement Plan into the City's Capital Facilities Plan Element. F. On September 20, 2023, the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Governance Board voted to adopt Resolution 186 approving the Puget Sound RFA 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Plan and Resolution 187 approving the Puget Sound RFA 2024 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy. G. The City of Kent has adopted a school impact fee program as authorized by the GMA and RCW 82.02.050. Impact fees may be collected and spent only for the public facilities which are addressed by the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. In order to collect school impact fees to be spent by the school districts, the City must adopt the schools' Capital Facilities Plans into the City's Capital Facilities Plan Element. H. The Kent, Federal Way, Highline, and Auburn School Districts have submitted proposed amendments to their Capital Facilities Plans to be included in an amendment of the City's Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Capital Facilities Element for 2024-2029 Capital Improvements I. On September 22, 2023, the City provided the State of Washington the required 60-day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 of the City's proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The 60-day notice period passed on November 21, 2023. J. On October 6, 2023, the City's SEPA responsible official issued a SEPA Addendum to existing environmental documents consisting of the Kent Comprehensive Plan Review and Midway Subarea Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Draft and Final (ENV-2010-3) and the Downtown Subarea Action Plan Supplemental EIS Draft and Final (ENV- 2012-30). The SEPA Addendum explained that the proposed amendment would not create unavoidable impacts beyond those previously identified in the EIS. K. After providing appropriate public notice, the City Council of the City of Kent conducted public hearings on October 3, 2023, and October 17, 2023, to consider the proposed biennium budget and six-year plan for capital improvements and the requested amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities Element. L. After providing appropriate public notice, the City Council of the City of Kent considered the requested Comprehensive Plan amendment and held a public hearing on the same on October 17, 2023. M. On November 21, 2023, the City Council for the City of Kent approved the Capital Facilities Element amendment to the Kent Comprehensive Plan to reflect a six-year plan for capital improvement projects (2024-2029), the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority's Capital Improvement Plan (2024-2029), and the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, Auburn, and Highline School Districts, as set forth in Exhibits A, B, and C attached and incorporated by this reference. 3 Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Capital Facilities Element for 2024-2029 Capital Improvements NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE SECTION 1. - Amendment. The Kent Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities Element are hereby amended to reflect a six-year plan for capital improvement projects (2024-2029), as set forth in Exhibit A attached and incorporated by this reference. SECTION 2. - Amendment. The Kent Comprehensive Plan, and its Capital Facilities Element, are amended to include the Six-Year Capital Improvement Plan of the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority for the years 2024 through 2029, as set forth in Exhibit B attached and incorporated by this reference. SECTION 3. - Amendment. The Kent Comprehensive Plan, and its Capital Facilities Element, are amended to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, Auburn, and Highline School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit C attached and incorporated by this reference. SECTION 4. - Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering; or references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations. SECTION 5. - SeverabilitY. If any one or more section, subsection, or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such 4 Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Capital Facilities Element for 2024-2029 Capital Improvements decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 6. - Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law. November 21, 2023 DANA RALPH, MAY Date Approved ATTEST: 4) a, November 21, 2023 KIMBERLEY KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted November 24, 2023 Date Published AP P ED AS TO FORM' TAM TE, CITY ATTORNEY ' 4w 4 f °fpal 5 Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Capital Facilities Element for 2024-2029 Capital Improvements Exhibit A - City of Kent CIP 2024m2u 29 0 capital Imp mont Plan 0 illol November 7, 2023 KENT W A S H I N G T O N 0 LLJ U- 0 KENT WASHINGTON LU LU CC CL CA cc CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2024-2029 SUMMARY PROJECTS AND FUNDING Capital project costs for the City's 2024-2029 capital planning period total $225.2 million and are funded with City,utility and other resources, as illustrated in the following tables. Additional details follow. 2024 2025t a City Resources $ 35,956 $ 16,783 $ 67,545 $ 120,284 Utility Resources 19,280 17,100 67,185 103,565 Other Resources 932 400 - 1,332 Total-in thousands $ 56,168 $ 34,283 $ 134,730 $ 225,181 2026-2029 Total General Government $ 22,631 $ 3,704 $ 12,341 $ 38,676 Parks,Rec&Comm Services 6,041 5,237 22,485 33,763 Public Safety - 350 250 600 Transportation 8,216 7,892 32,469 48,577 Utilities 19,280 17,100 67,185 103,565 Total-in thousands $ 56,168 $ 34,283 $ 134,730 $ 225,181 Sources of Funds Utility _ Resources 46% • Other Resources 1% City Resources 0 GW 53% Proiects by Category General Government Utilities 17% 46% Parks, Rec & Comm Services 15% gy? • Public Safety Transportation p% 22% 3 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN OPERATING IMPACT OF MAJOR CIP PROJECTS The impact of a capital project on the operating budget is a key factor in considering the inclusion of a project in the six-year plan. The operating costs of a project,and any savings resulting from the project,are captured in the Operating Budget. SOURCES OF FUNDS-in thousands t Sources of Funds City Resources $ 35,956 $ 16,783 $ 16,491 $ 16,862 $ 16,969 $ 17,223 $ 120,284 Utility Resources 19,280 17,100 16,96S 16,585 17,135 16,500 103,565 Other Resources 932 400 - - - 1,332 Total Sources of Funds $ 56,168 $ 34,283 $ 33,456 $ 33,447 $ 34,104 S 33,723 $ 225,181 0 2024 2025 2026r e City Resources CRF-Annual Allocation $ 7,125 $ 7,267 $ 7,413 $ 7,561 $ 7,712 $ 7,867 $ 44,945 LLJ CRF General 11,837 2,010 1,910 1,547 1,428 1,340 20,072 LL CRF REET2 2,701 1,846 2,046 2,598 2,553 2,711 14,455 0 Golf Admissions Tax 135 130 120 135 175 119 814 IT HLC/SLC Reserves 36 36 accesso ShoWare Funds 770 775 330 300 300 300 2,775 Criminal Justice Fund 2,000 2,000 Faciltities Lifecycle 2,059 767 634 628 647 666 5,401 IT Operating Fund 502 502 552 607 668 734 3,565 Utility Funding 5,087 5,087 Streets-Solid Waste Utility Tax 3,704 3,486 3,486 3,486 3,486 3,486 21,134 Total City Resources 35,956 16,783 16,491 16,862 16,969 17,223 120,284 LU Utility Resources Drainage Revenues 6,730 6,050 6,050 6,050 6,050 6,050 36,980 • Sewer Revenues 3,550 3,550 3,550 3,550 3,550 3,550 21,300 CL Water Revenues 9,000 7,500 7,365 6,985 7,535 6,900 45,285 Total Utility Resources 19,280 17,100 16,965 16,585 17,135 16,500 103,565 Other Resources American Rescue Plan Act(ARPA) 340 340 LID Funded 192 192 King County Levy 400 400 800 Total Other Resources 932 400 - 1,332 Total Sources of Funds $ 56,168 $ 34,283 $ 33,456 $ 33,447 $ 34,104 $ 33,723 $ 225,181 4 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN SUMMARY BY SOURCE 2024-2029 $in Thousands 60,000 • 50,000 • 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 a1 City Resources 0 Utility Resources V Other Resources 2024 SOURCES BY TYPE Drainage Revenues Sewer Revenues 12% 6% Golf Admissions Tax Streets Solid Water Revenues 024% Waste Utility 16% Tax... Utility Funding 9% Other 4% IT Operating....,, • Li 'fecyc e ARPA 1% 4% _. Criminal Justice Fund CRF-Annual King County Levy 1% 4% Allocation CRF 13% REET 2 5% • CRF General 21% 5 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECTS-in thousands 2024 2025 2026i t2029 Total Projects General Government $ 22,631 $ 3,704 $ 3,176 $ 3,082 $ 3,043 $ 3,040 $ 38,676 Parks,Rec&Comm Services 6,041 5,237 5,084 5,710 5,764 5,927 33,763 Public Safety 350 250 600 Transportation 8,216 7,892 7,981 8,070 8,162 8,256 48,577 Utilities 19,280 17,100 16,965 16,585 17,135 16,500 103,565 Total Projects $ 56,168 $ 34,283 $ 33,456 $ 33,447 $ 34,104 $ 33,723 $ 225,181 General Government • accesso ShoWare Center $ 770 $ 775 $ 330 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 2,775 Facilities 18,245 767 634 515 415 346 20,922 Technology 3,616 2,162 2,212 2,267 2,328 2,394 14,979 LA I Total General Government 22,631 3,704 3,176 3,082 3,043 3,040 38,676 Parks,Rec&Comm Services LU Golf 135 130 120 135 175 119 814 LL Parks and Recreation 5,906 5,107 4,964 5,575 5,589 5,808 32,949 • Total Parks,Rec&Comm Svcs 6,041 5,237 5,084 5,710 5,764 5,927 33,763 Transportation Site Improvements 8,216 7,892 7,981 8,070 8,162 8,256 48,577 Total Transportation 8,216 7,892 7,981 8,070 8,162 8,256 48,577 CC Public Safety Public Safety Projects 350 250 - 600 CL Total Public Safety - 350 250 - 600 Utilities LLI Water 9,000 7,500 7,365 6,985 7,535 6,900 45,285 Sewer 3,550 3,550 3,550 3,550 3,550 3,550 21,300 0 Drainage 6,730 6,050 6,050 6,050 6,050 6,050 36,980 Total Utilities 19,280 17,100 16,965 16,585 17,135 16,500 103,565 Total Projects $ 56,168 $ 34,283 $ 33,456 $ 33,447 $ 34,104 $ 33,723 $ 225,181 CL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN • SUMMARY BY CATEGORY 2024-2029 $in Thousands 60,000 50,000 • 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 W General Government U Parks,Rec&Comm Services W Transportation ■ Utilities 2024 BY CATEGORY FUNCTION Water Sewer 18% m 8% • Ck Drainage 14% Public Safety Other 0.39% 0.68% • Transportation accesso 18% " '~�� ShoWare -- Center 1.7% Golf 0.29% Technology 7% .. • Parks and Recreation 12% Facilities 21% 7 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GENERAL GOVERNMENT-in thousands • 2024 2025 2026r s tal Sources of Funds CRF General Capital $ 11,837 $ 1,660 $ 1,660 $ 1,547 $ 1,428 $ 1,340 $ 19,472 American Rescue Plan Act(ARPA) 340 340 accesso ShoWare Funds 770 775 330 300 300 300 2,775 IT Operating Fund 502 502 552 607 668 734 3,565 Criminal Justice Fund 2,000 2,000 Utility Funding 5,087 5,087 Facilities Fund Balance 1,478 175 24 1,677 Faciltities Lifecycle 581 592 610 628 647 666 3,724 HLC/SLC Reserves 36 36 Total Sources of Funds $ 22,631 $ 3,704 $ 3,176 $ 3,082 $ 3,043 $ 3,040 $ 38,676 Projects • Facilities Access Control 10 10 10 10 40 Closed Circuit TV(CCTV) 10 10 10 10 10 50 City Buildings-Exterior Painting 50 50 50 50 50 250 Elevator Modernization 30 30 30 30 30 30 180 Emergency Repairs 600 120 125 25 25 125 1,020 LU LL Facilities Reinvestment Fund 5,000 5,000 • Fire Alarm Updagrades 50 20 20 20 20 130 Furniture,Fixtures,and Equipment 50 50 50 50 50 250 HVAC Replacements 650 300 100 1,050 Kent East Hill Operations Center Phase 2 10,286 10,286 Kent Police Department Facility Upgrade 350 350 Kitchen Equipment 225 25 25 25 25 25 350 Parking Lots Repair 10 65 64 51 48 65 303 • Police Firing Range Upgrades 350 350 CL Public Building Major Maintenance 64 67 70 74 77 81 433 Roof Repairs 320 20 80 170 70 20 680 Security Camera Upgrades 200 - 200 Lu Total Facilities 18,245 767 634 515 415 346 20,922 •cc accesso ShoWare Center Audio System Replacement 530 530 Basket Ball Court Refurbish 50 50 Chairs and Tables 35 35 35 35 35 175 Concession Stand Rebranding 125 125 Floor Covering in Skate Areas 75 75 _ Half House Curtain and Vom Drapes 120 30 150 Hot Water Tank/Boilers(4) 200 200 400 Loading Dock Gate/Fence 75 75 Mural Replacement 15 15 15 45 Plaza Lighting 20 20 Plaza Sound System 40 40 8 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GENERAL GOVERNMENT CONTINUED—in thousands 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total Popcorn Popper 15 15 • Replace Hockey Rink Plexiglass 50 50 100 Restripping Parking Lot 20 20 Roof Repair 100 100 Stadium Seating Replacement 50 50 50 50 200 Suite and Club Rebranding 75 75 Zamboni Replacement 150 150 300 Unallocated - 65 150 65 280 Total accesso ShoWare Center 770 775 330 300 300 300 2,775 Technology HLC-Server Replacement 60 60 60 60 60 60 360 HLC-Telephony 60 60 60 60 60 60 360 HLC-Wireless Infrastructure Refresh 30 30 30 30 30 30 180 _ HLC-Data Center 100 100 100 100 100 100 600 HLC-Network Refresh 70 70 70 70 70 70 420 HLC-Security 153 130 130 130 130 130 803 HLC-Storage Expansion 30 30 30 30 30 30 180 HLC-UPS 30 30 30 30 30 30 180 _ HLC-Virtualization Infrastructure Refresh 100 100 100 100 100 100 600 SLC-Administration System Replacement Reserves 134 170 170 170 170 170 984 74 SLC-IT System Replacement Reserves 150 150 150 150 150 150 900 SLC-Law System Replacement Reserves 50 50 50 50 50 50 300 SLC-Police System Replacement Reserves 130 130 130 130 130 130 780 SLC-Human Resources System Replacement Reserves 70 70 70 70 70 70 420 0 SLC-Finance System Replacement Reserves 100 100 100 100 100 100 600 SLC-PRCS System Replacement Reserves 100 100 100 100 100 100 600 SLC-Public Works System Replacement Reserves 150 150 150 150 150 150 900 SLC-Court System Replacement Reserves 50 50 50 50 50 50 300 SLC-Economic Dev System Replacement Reserves 80 80 80 80 80 80 480 MDC Refresh 166 100 110 121 133 146 776 Computer Refresh 292 402 442 486 535 588 2,745 B&0 and Business License Enhancements 187 187 eConnect Replacement 36 36 Internet Infrastructure Assessmentand Upgrade 275 275 Intranet Redesign 225 225 JDE Replacement 250 250 Laserfiche Integrations 77 77 • Laserfiche Stabilization 45 45 Tiburon Replacement-1MS 38 38 Tiburon Replacement-RMS 38 38 Web Application Firewall 90 90 ZTA Program-Privileged Access Management Solution 250 250 Total Technology Projects 3,616 2,162 2,212 2,267 2,328 2,394 14,979 Total General Government Projects 22,631 3,704 3,176 3,082 3,043 3,040 38,676 • 9 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PARKS, RECREATION &COMMUNITY SERVICES—in thousands Sources of Funds CRFREET2 $ 2,000 $ 1,846 $ 2,000 $ 2,500 $ 2,500 $ 2,711 $ 13,557 CRF-Annual Allocation 2,805 2,861 2,918 2,977 3,036 3,097 17,694 CRF REET2 Fund Balance 701 46 98 53 898 Golf Admissions Tax 103 106 109 112 115 119 664 Golf Fund Balance 32 24 11 23 60 150 King County Levy 400 400 800 Total Sources of Funds 6,041 5,237 5,084 5,710 5,764 5,927 33,763 Projects Golf Projects Bunker Sand 10 10 20 Cart Path Repairs and Repaving 25 25 25 75 z Driving Range Net Replacement 50 50 50 150 Golf Cart Storage Doors 40 40 Irrigation Central Controller 40 40 Irrigation Satellite Controllers 25 25 25 75 Ln Maintenance Equipment Replacement 175 175 Parking Lot Landscaping 35 35 Sprinkler Heads 20 20 20 20 80 LU Miscellaneous Golf Projects 5 119 124 LL • Total Golf Projects 135 130 120 135 175 119 814 IL Lu LU IL 10 (0310LIPITAL IMPROVEMENT PARKS, RECREATION &COMMUNITY SERVICES-in thousands 20242025 2026 2027a , Parks and Recreation Projects Campus Park Improvements 368 368 Canterbury Park Improvements 250 500 750 Clark Lake Park Phase 1 Development 1,000 750 750 1,000 3,500 Commons Neighborhood Park Improvements 100 100 Downtown Parks Improvements 250 200 200 186 250 1,086 East Hill North Community Park Development 500 500 East Hill North Neighborhood Park Development 250 500 500 1,250 Eastridge Park Renovation 150 200 350 Garrison Park Improvements 1,000 1,000 Glenn Nelson Park Renovation 150 500 650 Hogan Park at Russell Road Phase 2 Renovation 350 350 KiwanisTotLot#4Renovation 30 30 _ KLVT-Old Fishing Hole Improvements 297 297 KVLT-Boeing Rock Improvements 177 250 500 927 14 KVLT-Meeker Parking Lot 355 355 KVLT-Phase 2lmprovements 250 250 Lake Fenwick Park Phase 2lmprovements 350 250 250 850 Mill Creek Canyon Trail Renovation 250 250 500 Mill Creek Canyon/Earthworks Park Improvements 500 750 750 750 1,000 1,000 4,750 North Meridian Park Redevelopment 200 350 750 500 1,800 Park Land Acquisition Account 250 250 250 250 250 250 1,500 Park Operations Lifecycle 500 500 500 500 500 500 3,000 s Park Orchard Park Improvements 361 361 Park Planning and Design(Masterplan/Architect) 50 50 50 150 Park Planning and Development Operating 921 996 1,046 1,098 1,153 1,211 6,425 Parks and Open Space Plan 250 250 500 Scenic Hill Park Renovation 150 500 650 Springwood Park 500 500 • Sun Meadows Park Improvements - 200 200 Total Parks and Recreation Projects 5,906 5,107 4,964 5,575 5,589 5,808 32,949 Total Projects 6,041 5,237 5,084 5,710 5,764 5,927 33,763 • • 71 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN • TRANSPORTATION-in thousands 2025 2026 2027 • • Sources of Funds CRF-Annual Allocation $ 4,320 $ 4,406 $ 4,495 $ 4,584 $ 4,676 $ 4,770 $ 27,251 LID Funded Projects 192 192 Solid W a ste Utility Tax 3,704 3,486 3,486 3,486 3,486 3,486 21,134 Total Sources of Funds $ 8,216 $ 7,892 $ 7,981 $ 8,070 $ 8,162 $ 8,256 $ 48,577 Projects B&O In-house Overlays 250 250 250 250 250 250 1,500 B&O Street Contracted 750 1,891 3,425 3,214 3,806 3,900 16,986 B&O Unallocated 200 200 200 500 500 500 2,100 LID 362-84th Avenue Rehabilitation 168 168 LID 363-224th-228th(EVH-88th) 24 24 Residential Street Contracted 3,704 3,486 3,486 3,486 3,486 3,486 21,134 • EVH(212th-196th) 1,445 1,445 MeetMe on Meeker64th Avenue 1,000 1,000 Mill Creek at 76th Avenue Flood Prevention 1,500 1,500 SR509-Stage lb-SR 516 Interchange Auxiliary La ne 250 250 250 250 1,000 SR509-Stage 2-Southbound Auxiliary Lane 250 250 250 250 1,000 City Safety Transportation Program 120 120 120 120 120 120 720 LU Total Projects $ 8,216 $ 7,892 $ 7,981 $ 8,070 $ 8,162 $ 8,256 $ 48,577 IL LU LU IL 12 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN UTILITIES-in thousands Sources of Funds Water Revenues $ 9,000 $ 7,500 $ 7,365 $ 6,985 $ 7,535 $ 6,900 $ 45,285 Sewer Revenues 3,550 3,550 3,550 3,550 3,550 3,550 21,300 Drainage Revenues 6,730 6,050 6,OS0 6,050 6,050 6,050 36,980 Total Sources of Funds $ 19,280 $ 17,100 $ 16,965 $ 16,585 $ 17,135 $ 16,500 $103,565 Projects Water Supply&Distribution 2024 Watermain 400 400 212th Treatment Plant Improvements 400 400 228th-Central to 88th Waterline 600 400 1,000 590 Zone Transmission(EH 640 PZ) 980 980 640 Pressure Zone 2,000 2,500 4,500 640 Transmission Main Improvements(EH 640 PZ) 1,115 1,115 2,230 - 640 Zone BPS#2 (EH 640 PZ) 1,300 400 1,700 Caustic Tank Replacement EH Well&PS 5 250 250 - Clark&Kent Springs Chlorination Improvements 350 350 Garrison/O'Brien Treatment Plant 1,300 1,300 Generator Improvement Program 1,000 1,000 Miscellaneous Water 800 500 500 500 500 1,050 3,850 _ PLC Upgrades 35 35 35 35 35 35 210 Reservoir Maintenance and Improvements 500 500 500 500 500 750 3,250 Rock Creek Mitigation Projects 500 500 Security Improvements per VA 50 50 50 50 50 50 300 SR516/Covington Way 500 1,000 1,500 rn Tacoma Intertie-Ongoing Capital 50 50 50 50 500 2,500 3,200 rri Transmission Easements 50 50 SO 50 50 50 300 UPRR Hanger Replacement 50 600 650 Wapato Creek 509 Alexander Avenue 50 200 100 350 Water Meter Replacement Program 2,600 1,600 4,200 Water System Plan Update 400 400 800 Watermain Replacements/Repairs 1,535 450 2,465 500 500 1,065 6,515 Well Rehabilitation 200 400 400 300 400 400 2,100 West Hill Booster Pump Station 1,400 400 1,800 West Hill Transmission Main 1,650 1,650 Total Water Supply&Distribution 9,000 7,500 7,365 6,985 7,535 6,900 45,285 71 Sewer Horseshoe Acres Pump Station 1,000 2,500 1,000 1,000 5,500 Linda Heights Pump Station 1,785 1,000 2,785 Miscellaneous Pump Station Rehab 75 75 2S0 500 S00 500 1,900 Miscellaneous Sewer 500 500 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 4,500 Sewer Main Replacements/Relining 140 425 750 1,000 2,000 2,000 6,315 Tree Root Removal 50 50 50 50 50 50 300 • Total Sewer 3,550 3,550 3,550 3,550 3,550 3,550 21,300 13 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN UTILITIES CONTINUED-in thousands Stormwater Management 267th Culvert $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000 $ - $ - $ 1,000 81stAve Pump Station 600 250 1,900 250 3,000 Drainage Property Maintenance 200 200 200 200 200 200 1,200 GRNRA Pump Station North 3,000 5,000 8,000 GRNRA Security&Maintenance 50 500 500 500 500 2,050 Kent Airport Levee 500 100 600 Lake Meridian Estate Outfall 1,000 1,000 Mill Creek Culvert Maintenance 250 250 250 250 250 250 1,500 Mill Creek Rehabilitation 4,280 2,350 2,050 2,350 11,030 Misc Environmental Projects 50 50 50 50 50 250 0 Miscellaneous Drainage 300 600 900 North Fork Meridian Valley Culvert 500 500 1,000 Pipe Replacements/RoadwayImprovements 1,000 950 500 950 2,050 5,450 Total Stormwater Management 6,730 6,050 6,050 6,050 6,050 6,050 36,980 Total Utilities Projects $ 19,280 $ 17,100 $ 16,965 $ 16,585 $ 17,135 $ 16,500 $103,565 LL LU LU 14 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PUBLIC SAFETY 2024 2025 ! !27 2028 2029 Sources of Funds Capital Resource Fund $ $ 350 $ 250 $ $ $ $ 600 Total Sources of Funds 350 250 600 Projects Command Post Vehicle 300 300 Jail Expansion 50 250 300 Tota I Public Safety Projects $ $ 350 $ 250 $ $ $ $ 600 GW Ln 15 PUGET SOUND Exhibit B - PSRFA CIP Professionally and • REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY compassionately helping people. INTERNATIONALLY ACCREDITED FIRE AGENCY Capital Improvement Plan Mitigation & Level of Service Policy (Six year update to the 2014-2033 Capital Equipment Plan) corn � � 4 ram. V i /... Table of Contents Background and Demographics............................................................................................................3 Contractsfor Service..............................................................................................................................4 King County Fire District 43 (City of Maple Valley)Service Area............................................4 City of SeaTac Service Area......................................................................................................4 PSFPerformance Metrics.......................................................................................................................5 Measured Components of Emergency Response.................................................................................8 Six Year Growth Projection..................................................................................................................11 PSFLevel of Service.............................................................................................................................13 Distribution & Resource Allocation .....................................................................................................16 SixYear Capacity Estimate...................................................................................................................17 Six Year Financing Component...........................................................................................................18 Capital Purchases&Expected Service Improvements .......................................................................19 ExpectedSystem Impacts....................................................................................................................19 Current Capital Resources Inventory ..................................................................................................20 Effects of New Development on Performance ...................................................................................21 MitigationMethodology......................................................................................................................21 FeeProcess ..........................................................................................................................................22 PSFFunding Share...............................................................................................................................25 Definitions............................................................................................................................................25 Acronyms .............................................................................................................................................26 References............................................................................................................................................27 AppendixA— Fee Formula...................................................................................................................28 Appendix B—Single Family Worksheet Guide....................................................................................29 Appendix C— Multi-Family Worksheet Guide.....................................................................................30 Appendix D—Commercial Worksheet Guide.....................................................................................31 Appendix E—PSF Service Area Map....................................................................................................32 Appendix F— Planned Capital Purchases............................................................................................33 Appendix G— PSF Current Facilities Inventory....................................................................................36 Appendix H — PSF Current Apparatus Inventory.................................................................................38 Puget Sound Fire l4 Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 2 of 41 Introduction This Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is an annual rolling six-year update of the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority(PSF) 2014—2033 Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan (Master Plan).The Mitigation and Level of Service Policy is also integrated into this document.This plan addresses six core elements;and complies with the requirements of the Growth Management Act(GMA), RCW, and local ordinances.The goal of this Plan is to set a Level of Service, identify the next six years of community growth, determine the need for additional capital resources,and prepare a six-year funding plan.This plan also provides guidance for the determination of impacts from growth and development;and establishes appropriate fees. The Cities of Covington, Kent, and Tukwila find that the GMA requires that new growth and development should pay a proportionate share of the cost of new facilities needed to serve the new growth and development.All three cities assess fire impact fees to promote orderly growth and development.The financing for system improvements to serve new development must provide for a balance between impact fees and other sources of public funds;and cannot rely solely on impact fees. This Plan identifies: • PSF Demographics • PSF adopted Level of Service over the next six years • Six-Year Growth Projections • Six-Year Funding Plan to meet projected capital needs • Expected System Impacts from future capital improvements • Current Inventory of existing capital resources Background and Demographics PSF is an independent special purpose district formed under chapter 52.26 RCW providing fire and emergency services to nearly 118 square miles of urban and rural area.The City of Kent and King County Fire Protection District No. 37,which includes the city of Covington,joined to form the original Regional Fire Authority in 2010.The City of SeaTac entered a contractual consolidation with PSF in 2014, Maple Valley Fire entered a contractual consolidation with PSF in 2018.The City of Tukwila entered in a contractual consolidation with PSF in 2023, and then annexed into PSF on January 1, 2024.The PSF service area includes the cities of Covington, Kent, Maple Valley, SeaTac, and Tukwila, as well as unincorporated areas of King County within Fire Districts 37 and 43.Services are delivered 24-hours per day, 365 days per year by career firefighters and support staff. Services delivered by PSF include fire suppression,fire prevention, code enforcement,fire investigation; Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 3 of 41 emergency and non-emergent medical services(medical), hazardous materials response,specialized rescue, emergency management,community risk reduction, and community relations. Generally, PSF's service area borders Renton and Seattle to the north,the Cascade foothills to the east,Auburn to the south and Burien, Des Moines, and Federal Way to the west. PSF serves an estimated population of 264,169. This update utilizes the service standards adopted by PSF in its Community Risk Assessment/Standard of Cover (CRA/SOC) document which is incorporated herein by reference.The CRA/SOC is required by the Center for Public Safety Excellence (CPSE) as part of the Accreditation process.These standards are used to identify gaps in service and guide capital resource planning to address identified gaps.The goal is to sustain and/or improve current services while addressing the service impacts of new development and community growth.The resources identified in this six-year plan work toward implementing the deployment strategies identified in the Master Plan, and CRA/SOC. See Appendix E for a Map of PSF Service Area. Contracts for Service King County Fire District 43 (City of Maple Valley) Service Area Starting on October 1, 2018, PSF provides fire-based services to King County Fire District#43 (FD43)through a contract for service.The FD43 area covers approximately 50.86 square miles. It includes the City of Maple Valley,the Hobart area,the Ravensdale area, and a large unincorporated area of rural land. FD43 and the City of Maple Valley has an estimated population of 44,537. Six fire stations are owned by FD43.Three stations are currently unstaffed volunteer stations that remain part of FD43.The other three stations are operated by PSF under the service contract. Most other capital resources previously owned by Maple Valley prior to 2018 have been transferred to the ownership of PSF.As a condition of the service contract, FD43 continues to fund fire stations and provides an annual capital payment to PSF to assist funding other resource needs. City of SeaTac Service Area Starting on January 1, 2014, PSF provides fire-based services to the City of SeaTac through a contract for service.SeaTac covers approximately 7.67 square miles surrounding the Port of Seattle Airport and has an estimated population of 31,910. Two fire stations owned by SeaTac are leased and operated by PSF under the service contract.All other capital resources have been transferred to the ownership of PSF.As a condition of the service contract,SeaTac provides an annual capital payment to PSF for funding the equipment that was transferred but has retained responsibility for the capital costs of fire stations. Puget Sound Fire �49(:oc)oECapital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 4 of 41 PSF Performance Metrics Time is the critical metric to evaluate. In setting response goals, PSF looks at two timeframes, one for Fire and one for Medical. For Fire,the key is time to Flashover.The need to arrive prior to Flashover is critical to life and property preservation. For Medical,the measure is time to"brain death."The need to arrive prior to brain death is critical to meaningful recovery from a medical event.This is often measured in resuscitation success rates for cardiac events. For medical events involving trauma,the time to delivery at a Trauma Center is key. Essentially,the quicker we are,the better the outcomes. Flashover Flashover is the most dangerous time in fire growth.As a fire grows within a room, its radiant heat is absorbed by the contents of the room heating the combustible gases and objects to their ignition point until finally the entire room bursts into flame,spreading outside of the room involved. u Over the past SO years,fire engineers agree that the replacement of wood and other natural products with plastics and synthetic materials for interior furnishings has resulted in increased fuel loads, higher fire temperatures,and decreased time to flashover, making quick response more important than ever. Flashover can typically occur from less than four to beyond 10 minutes after free burning starts depending upon the air supply available to the fire. Once flashover occurs, it is no longer possible for survival in the room of flashover. Not even firefighters in complete protective gear can survive the intense heat of flashover.A post-flashover fire burns hotter and moves faster, making search and rescue more difficult and riskier in the remainder of the structure. Once flashover occurs more firefighters are needed to deal with the much larger and growing fire problem. Fire growth occurs exponentially;that is,fire doubles in size every minute of free burn that is allowed. Factors that determine when flashover may occur include the type of fuel,the arrangement of the fuels, room size, 7� Puget Sound Fire � � Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 5 of 41 and so on. Because these factors vary,the exact time to flashover cannot be predicted, making quick response and rapid-fire attack the best way to control fire, protect life, and reduce fire loss. Flashover and fire spread can be mitigated.The table below shows the progression of fire and which timeframes can be managed by the fire department, and which cannot.The elapsed time from fire ignition to fire reporting varies but can be indirectly managed using monitored fire alarms and suppression systems to help mitigate the growth of fire.These systems can automatically report the presence of a fire to a dispatch center. If all structures were equipped with a monitored fire alarm and automatic fire sprinkler system, dispatch time would be reduced.This would allow firefighters to arrive at the scene when fires are smaller and more easily controlled. i' This diagram illustrates ?Ir. deg" �d UNREONCHO . �� i. fire growth over time and Lam` wr.e« .u:d the sequence of events that may occur from sffim_ x try �� °� ignition to suppression. ACWM s 1 urns ACnWM Depending on the size of 1 room,contents of the room,and available I oxygen,flashover can I occur in less than two or more than 10 minutes. Flashover occurs most frequently between four and 10 minutes. r � i i * A NORTIIER:V n.unos ,.` HRS INSPFMRS t%OQATIOI I As the above exhibit illustrates, properly maintained and functioning fire sprinkler systems in both residential and commercial occupancies help control a fire before the arrival of firefighting resources. Automatic fire sprinklers can control fire and buy firefighters significant time toward saving lives and minimizing loss from fire. �� Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 6 of 41 Brain Death The delivery of emergency medical services (EMS) by first responders is also time critical for many types of injuries and events. If a person has a heart attack and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is started within four minutes,that person's chances of leaving the hospital alive are four times greater than if they did not receive CPR until after four minutes. CPR begun in Survival 4 minutes or less rate CPR begun more Survival than 4 minutes rate after arrest O 10% 20% 30% 4001. Sn"4 cl Rrate ofHec&rtAttc k b rctinu When CPR IsAvoilol�le Chances of survival are increased with the intervention of a cardiac defibrillator. All PSF staff are trained to use and carry cardiac defibrillators.The exhibit below shows the survival rate of a heart attack patient with CPR and defibrillation. Response Time / Intervention vs. Survival 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 2 _ 3 4 3 6 7 s 9 atO Time Varies EMS Response Time Detection -- of - F, fi�1�5a CollapseIntervention Unmanageable Time SomeManageable Time ��� Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 7 of 41 Measured Components of Emergency Response There are several components that make up PSF"response"time.The timeline starts with the activation of the 911 system (a call to dispatch) and stops with the arrival at the scene of the incident. It is important to also consider the time needed for access and set up. Alarm Processing Time:Amount of time that it takes to receive and process an emergency call.This includes (1) receiving the call, (2) determining what the emergency is, (3)verifying where the emergency is located, (4) determining what resources and fire department units are required to handle the call, and (5) notifying the fire department units that are to respond.This is handled through Valley Communications(PSF Dispatch Center). Turnout Time:The time from when fire department units are first notified of an emergency to the beginning point of travel time.This includes discontinuing and securing the activity firefighters were involved in at time of dispatch,traveling by foot to their apparatus, donning appropriate personal protective equipment and taking a seat-belted position on the apparatus to respond. Travel Time:The time that starts when the wheels of a response apparatus/vehicle begin to roll towards an emergency incident and ends when wheels of the response vehicle stop rolling upon arrival at the address of the emergency scene. Access Time:Amount of time required for the crew to move from where the apparatus stops at the address of an emergency incident,to where the actual emergency exists.This can include moving to the interior or upper stories of a large building and dealing with any barriers such as locked gates, stairways, elevators, doors, or other restrictions that may slow access to the area of the emergency. Setup Time: For fires,the amount of time required for fire department units to set up, connect hose lines, position ladders,and prepare to extinguish the fire.Setup time includes disembarking the fire apparatus, placing hose lines, charging hose lines, donning self-contained breathing apparatus, making entry into the building, and applying water.The opportunity for saving time during setup is minimal, even for trained personnel. For Medical,the amount of time required for fire fighters to don personal protective equipment (mask,gowns,gloves,etc.), access the patient, deploy lifesaving equipment such as defibrillators,oxygen masks, and/or other medical gear. Response Time:Adding Alarm Time, Turnout Time, and Travel Time together, provides the Response Time. Access Time is currently not tracked, and therefore not a part of"Response Time." Response Time standards expect the adopted times to be performed at least nine out of every 10 times from receipt of a 9-1-1 call to the arrival of fire and EMS resources. ® Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 8 of 41 Dr. Lori Moore-Merrell wrote an article on Understanding and Measuring Fire Department Response Times'. Dr. Moore-Merrell's article states that there are three basic components of fire department emergency response performance: • Availability—The degree to which the resources are ready and available to respond. • Capability—The abilities of deployed resources to manage an incident. • Operational Effectiveness—A product of availability and capability. It is the outcome achieved by the deployed resources or the ability to match resources deployed to the risks to which they are responding. NFPA 1710:Standard for the Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, Emergency Medical Operations, and Special Operations to the Public by Career Fire Departments establishes criteria that provide a standard for comparison: Alarm Answering Time: 15 seconds for 95%of calls;40 seconds for 99%of calls. Alarm Processing Time: 64 seconds for 90%of calls; 106 seconds for 95%of calls. Turnout Time:60 seconds (1 Minute)for Medical. 80 seconds(1 Minute and 20 seconds)for Fire. Travel Time- Medical - Basic Life Support (BLS): 240 seconds(4 minutes) or less for the arrival of a unit with first responder or higher-medical certification capability at an emergency medical incident. Travel Time - Medical -Advanced life support(ALS):480 seconds(8 minutes) or less for the arrival of an advanced life support unit at an emergency medical incident,where the service is provided by the fire department. Travel Time - Fire - First Engine Arrive on Scene Time:240 seconds(4 minutes)for 90%of responses with a minimum staffing of four personnel. Travel Time - Fire -Second Company Arrive on Scene Time: 360 seconds(6 minutes)for 90%of responses with a minimum staffing of four personnel. Travel Time - Fire - Initial Full Alarm- Low and Medium Hazard Assembly Time:480 seconds (8 minutes) on 90%of responses. Travel Time - Fire- Initial Full Alarm- High Hazard/High-Rise Assembly Time: 610 seconds(10 minutes 10 seconds) on 90%of responses. https://www.lexipol.com/resources/blog/understanding-and-measuring-fire-department-response-times/ 4A�� Puget Sound Fire `�01 Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 9 of 41 Although NFPA 1710 provides essential benchmarks, PSF measures baseline performance in terms of total response time,which is the time it takes from the call to be received at Valley Communications Center(Alarm) until the first unit arrives on the scene of the emergency incident.Total response time should be measured and reported for all first-due units and the effective response force (ERF) assembly.Total response time is composed of call-processing time,turnout time, and travel time: Alarm time—the elapsed time from the call being received to the dispatching of the first unit. Turnout time—the elapsed time from when a unit is dispatched until that unit changes their status to "responding." Travel time—the elapsed time from when a unit begins to respond until its arrival on the scene. NFPA Standard 1710 PSF relies on nationally recognized standards published by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). NFPA is a global self-funded organization, established in 1896, devoted to eliminating death, injury, property, and economic loss due to fire, electrical, and related hazards. Fire call o First-in:_ (Alarm =1:00+Turnout= 1:20+Travel =4:00) =6:20 o Full alarm: (Alarm = 1:00+Turnout= 1:20+Travel =8:00) = 10:20 Medical —Basic&Advanced Life Support Services o First-in:_ (Alarm =1:00+Turnout= 1:00+Travel =4:00) =6:00 o Full Alarm:_(Alarm =1:00+Turnout= 1:00+Travel =8:00) = 10:00 Along with using the national standards published by the NFPA, PSF uses several other resources to determine the best industry practices.The Center for Public Safety Excellence is a not-for-profit corporation that helps high-performing fire departments and emergency services professionals in their efforts to continuously improve. CPSE does Fire Department Accreditation, Fire and Emergency Services professional Credentialing, and offers Education Programs on contemporary fire and emergency services"Best Practices." CPSE is a consortium of the International Association of Fire Chiefs(IAFC), International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF),the International City/County Management Association (ICMA),the International Code Council (ICC),the Insurance Services Office (ISO),the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), and the United States Fire Administration (USFA).Together this group maintains the Commission on Fire Accreditation International (CFAI) and the criteria for fire departments, like PSF,to achieve Accredited Agency Status. Critical to achieving Accredited Agency Status is an assessment of the fire department's ability to effectively deliver service.To make this assessment,the CFAI has established a methodology for determining the fire and non-fire risks of a community,assessing the fire department's capability compared to that risk, measuring fire department resource capacity, and guidelines for performance standards to assess overall performance of a fire department.The CFAI publishes this methodology in its Standards of Cover manual.The term Standard of AOW?' Puget Sound Fire !�� Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 10 of 41 Cover refers to the"standard(s)"to which a fire department runs daily operations to"cover"the service area of the fire department. Six Year Growth Projection PSF looks at the growth projections over the next six years to properly plan for capital resource needs.Along with historical growth data provided by the Office of Financial Management, PSF evaluates indications of growth with impacts to level of service. PSF looks at the overall emergency calls for services; housing and population projections; and commercial development. The growth predictions, identified in this CIP, are evaluated for potential impacts to the PSF level of service.An analysis of impacts to System Capacity help to predict future capital resources needed to maintain the PSF adopted level of service post growth. System Capacity is measured by bay space for response apparatus and accommodations for staffing. Essentially how many vehicles and people each station can accommodate. System Capacity is increased by adding apparatus and staffing to the system. PSF is constantly assessing the response needs of our system.To address changing needs in the community PSF can re-deploy apparatus and/or increase Concentration (apparatus and staffing).System Capacity is also increased by adding additional fire stations. Currently, bay space is the main limiting factor with 70%of our bay space occupied by response apparatus. PSF bay space in Stations with higher call volume growth are at maximum capacity.Stations with lower call volume growth still have some capacity for adding apparatus.The PSF would need to either remodel existing facilities or build new facilities to increase bay space capacity to address predicted growth. Emergency Calls for Services Emergency incidents continue to increase each year commensurate with growth. Notable increases can be seen in the cities of Covington, Maple Valley, and Tukwila.All PSF areas have experienced a steeper increase in 2021 and 2022 leading to higher overall call volumes. 5-Year Annual Incident Count 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 5 year Change Covington 1,618 1,635 1,644 1,848 2,126 31% FD37 498 511 516 579 615 23% FD43 1,096 1,203 1,281 1,229 1,263 15% Kent 17,844 18,244 17,720 19,402 20,820 17% Maple Valley 1,508 1,572 1,561 1,859 1,936 28% Tukwila 5,734 5,979 5,284 6,869 7,527 31% SeaTac 4,658 4,840 4,690 5,452 5,430 17% TOTAL 32,956 33,984 32,696 37,238 39,717 21% d`�c Puget Sound Fire 1) o Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 11 of 41 Population Growth Projections According to the Office of Financial Management,the State of Washington population, as of April 1, 2022, is estimated to be 7,864,400.Washington State population increased by 97,425 people (from births,deaths, and net migration)from the 2020 census adjusted base.The crude population growth rate is 1.3%, almost 0.5% more than last year.As expected,the COVID-19 crisis still affected the 2022 estimates. Migration continues to be the primary driver behind population growth. From 2021 to 2022, net migration (people moving in minus people moving out)to Washington totaled 83,300,which is up 40,500 people since 2021. Net migration accounted for 85%of the state's population growth,with natural increase (births minus deaths) responsible for the other 15%.This discrepancy-net migration at 85%- is the largest in the last three decades. "Vision 2050" is a four-county regional plan created by the Puget Sound Regional Council.The plan identifies Kent, SeaTac, and Tukwila as"Core Cities."Core Cities are targeted to accommodate 28%of the regional population growth and 35%of employment growth.Vision 2050 identifies Covington and Maple Valley as "Cities and Towns." Covington, along with this group of"Cities and Towns," is targeted to accommodate 6%of the regional population growth and 4%of employment growth.The King County Countywide Planning Policies call for the following amount of new residential units by 2044: 10,200 units in Kent, 5,900 units in SeaTac, 6,500 units in Tukwila,4,310 units in Covington,and 1,720 units in Maple Valley. Housing Unit Growth Projections Housing, another indicator of population change, remained strong in 2022. Housing in 2022 increased by 1.4%over the previous year.Washington added 46,500 housing units last year.This decade begins with annual housing change exceeding the previous decade average of 31,500 housing units.Statewide, 58%of all new housing units in 2022 were associated with multi-family structures. Locally, housing is projected to grow at varying rates in the PSF area. King County Fire District#37 (FD37), FD43, Kent, and SeaTac all have projected housing growth rates of around 1%annually over the next six years. The City of Covington has a projected growth rate of 3.5%,the City of Maple Valley 4.5%, and the City of Tukwila at 5.2%annually over the next six years. For Fire Impact Fee purposes,we project the housing unit increase to be 16,253 units in Covington, Kent, and Tukwila. July 1, 2022 2029 Projected 2022 Estimated 2029 Projected Population Population Housing Units Housing Units Covington 21,200 22,908 7,398 9,085 FD37 6,002 6,486 2,159 2,258 FD43 15,617 16,875 5,824 6,038 Kent 137,900 149,012 49,732 53,326 Maple Valley 28,920 31,250 9,856 12,807 SeaTac 31,910 34,481 11,851 12,324 Tukwila 22,620 24,443 9,198 12,479 TOTAL 264,169 285,456 96,018 108,317 �'�c- Puget Sound Fire \$ 1 Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 12 of 41 Commercial Growth Projections- New Construction For Fire Impact Fee purposes,we project the increase in commercial square footage to be 13,206,735 square feet.We use the 2035 average minus the Actual growth to get the estimated figure. Commercial Growth Projections (Square Feet of Commercial Space) 2023 Low Estimate High Estimate Average 2022 63,680,770 63,775,019 63,727,895 Actual 2029 62,832,531 Low Estimate High Estimate Average 69,239,674 70,527,487 69,883,580 Formula Factor 2035 13,206,735 Low Estimate High Estimate Average 74,798,578 77,279,954 76,039,266 The pattern of growth and estimates of future impacts on service demand remain consistent with the Master Plan for the PSF service area.As a result of this evaluation,the projected population growth, new dwelling units, and commercial square footage estimates used in calculating impact fees remain consistent as used in previous versions. PSF Level of Service Chapter 52.33 RCW requires substantially career fire departments(paid staff)to establish Level of Service (LOS) policies and performance objectives based on the arrival of first responders with defibrillation equipment prior to brain death and the arrival of adequate fire suppression resources prior to flashover. This law recognizes NFPA Standard 1710 and the Commission on Fire Accreditation International's (CFAI) Standard of Cover as bases for this statute and requires a 90%performance expectation of the established LOS. Time is a critical issue and is carefully measured to evaluate performance in the fire service. PSF responses are divided into two categories— Fire or Medical. Each has important time benchmarks that directly correlate to outcomes.The quicker trained personnel access the emergency,the better the outcomes. Fire can expand at a rate many times its volume per minute.A quick response is critical for the rescue of occupants and the application of extinguishing agents to minimize loss.The time segment between fire ignition and the start of fire suppression activities has a direct relationship to fire loss. Medical Survival rates, for some types of medical emergencies, are dependent upon rapid intervention by trained emergency medical personnel.The quicker medical interventions are initiated,the better the patient outcomes. Puget Sound Fire r��� Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 13 of41 PSF maintains a "Community Risk assessment/Standard of Cover"document as part of their accreditation process through the CPSE.The CRA/SOC is the"Standard"or Level of Service (LOS)to which the fire department will deliver services to the community. Performance below benchmark standards can contribute to unnecessary property and life loss.The continuum of time of fire service performance to adopted level of service standard includes three main components measured at the 90th percentile (nine out of 10 times) of performance. Each standard is divided into Urban and Rural; Fire and Medical;then further divided into Low, Moderate, and High-Risk categories.The first standard is for the First Unit to arrive.The second standard is for the First Alarm, or Effective Response Force (ERF)to arrive.An ERF refers to the number of resources and personnel needed to effectively provide fire or emergency medical services capable of mitigating the incident.The number of resources making up an ERF varies by type of emergency and level of risk. The first unit to arrive can begin to render aid or perform other necessary tasks as a component of an ERF but cannot resolve the incident alone.The ERF for life threatening medical calls requires two or more resources. The ERF for a structure fire requires five or more resources.The additional resources of the ERF must respond from greater distances than the first-in resource,therefore;the first-in and ERF have separate performance expectations. First unit arrival objectives: 90% performance expectation. Urban Service Area Low Risk o Fire Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:55) +Travel Time (5:35) =8:40 o Medical Alarm (1:30) +Turnout(1:45) +Travel Time (10:15)= 13:30 Moderate Risk o Fire Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:55) +Travel Time (4:35) =7:40 o Medical Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:45) +Travel Time (4:35) =7:30 High Risk o Fire Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:55) +Travel Time (4:35)=7:40 o Medical Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:45) +Travel Time (4:35) =7:30 ��AJf t Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 14 of 41 Rural Service Area Low Risk o Fire Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:55) +Travel Time (7:35) = 10:00 o Medical Alarm (1:30) +Turnout(1:45) +Travel Time (13:15) = 16:30 Moderate and High Risk o Fire Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:55) +Travel Time (6:30) =9:35 o Medical Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:45) +Travel Time (6:30) =9:25 Full first alarm arrival objectives: 90% performance expectation. Urban Service Area Low Risk o Fire Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:55) +Travel Time (7:55)= 10:00 o Medical Alarm (1:30) +Turnout(1:45) +Travel Time (8:35) = 11:50 Moderate Risk o Fire Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:55) +Travel Time (12:55) = 16:00 o Medical Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:45) +Travel Time (6:20) =9:15 High Risk o Fire Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:55) +Travel Time (17:35)= 20:40 o Medical Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:45) +Travel Time (6:20) =9:15 � � Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 15 of 41 Rural Service Area Low Risk o Fire Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:55) +Travel Time (9:55) = 12:00 o Medical Alarm (1:30) +Turnout(1:45) +Travel Time (13:05)= 16:20 Moderate and High Risk o Fire— Hydrant Supply Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:55) +Travel Time (14:55) = 18:00 o Fire —Tender Supply Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:55) +Travel Time (15:55)= 19:00 o Medical Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:45) +Travel Time (8:20) = 11:15 King County Standards The King County Comprehensive Plan and Countywide Planning Policies are based on the concept of concurrency and require that adequate facilities and services be available or be made available to serve development as it occurs.The County Comprehensive Plan recognizes the validity of using a response time analysis in determining appropriate service levels and recognizes the central role of fire protection districts and regional fire authorities in providing those services. However, King County has not adopted any fire service response standards. Local Response Standards City of Covington, Kent, and Tukwila—Adopts PSF Standards City of Maple Valley-Standards set out in Contract for Services(Interlocal Agreement) City of SeaTac—Standards set out in Contract for Services(Interlocal Agreement) King County Fire Protection District No. 37—Adopts PSF Standards King County Fire Protection District No.43 -Standards set out in Contract for Services(Interlocal Agreement) Distribution & Resource Allocation Fire stations and resources are strategically located throughout PSF to serve the community. Each fire station can accommodate varying levels of fire resources (Capacity). Ideally,the capacity of each fire station should be commensurate with the demand of the surrounding service area. For example, areas with a high service demand will have fire stations with higher capacity levels.The capacity of a fire station is increased by adding ` Puget Sound Fire `,1W' Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 16 of 41 fire resources such as fire engines, ladder trucks, aid cars, specialty equipment,and trained staff.The limiting factors for capacity are bay space and dorms. System failure begins to occur when the demand for resources is increased to a point where simultaneous requests for a resource begins to commonly occur.When service demand exceeds a fire station's capacity, a resource from a fire station further away must respond in its place.The result of this situation is referred to as "Cascading Failure."The failure of one resource to be available to answer emergency calls cascades to the next closest fire station resource, leaving two service areas impacted when the covering resource vacates its assigned area to make up for lack of capacity of the failing resource area.This effect continues with a ripple effect to other fire stations and jurisdictions. Cascading Failure causes longer travel times to reach emergency scenes and outcomes are affected. Longer travel times make it less likely that those resources can arrive prior to the negative outcomes of flashover and brain death.The solution to Cascading Failure is the addition of service capacity to the area experiencing high demand.The cost of adding resources must be balanced with the community expectation of service levels. Lower response times will have higher costs due to the increase in resources needed to provide that service level. Six Year Capacity Estimate PSF looks at the demand on resources when evaluating future System Capacity needs.We look at Reliability and Unit Hour Utilization. Reliability, in this context, is how often PSF units arrived first to an incident in their assigned response area. In other words,the unit is available (not on another emergency call)to respond to that emergency incident.When units are busy,they are less likely to be available to respond to calls in their response area. Reliability levels below the adopted performance expectation indicate resource exhaustion. PSF's ability to meet its response time standards is directly affected by resource reliability. Unit Hour Utilization (UHU) measures, in hourly time periods,the on-duty time consumed by emergency activities.The percentage of time on an emergency incident versus the time available for dispatch creates the UHU Percentage measurement.These percentages were then compared to a scale based on CPSE's threshold of 90%. Meaning that a unit is available 90%of the time when an incident occurs in their assigned response area. For UHU, PSF uses historical incident data broken down to an hour-by-hour view of the percentage that each unit(e.g. E371 and A371), and various groupings of units (e.g. Sta. 71 units), arrived first to incidents that Unit Hour Utilization occurred within their assigned response area. 0-4.9% Extremely Under 5 - 9.9% Under 10- 14.9% Optimal 15 - 19.9% High 20 - 24.9% Very High 25 - 29.9% Over 30%+ Extremely Over �� Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 17 of 41 PSF sets a target UHU of Optimal/High Use (10 to 20%)for our system.This allows for the balance of financial resources and maintaining concurrence during growth. CPSE standards indicate that UHU rates in the very high range (20—24.9%) can lead to personnel burnout issues and negatively impact response performance. UHU rates in the Extremely Under range are not financially efficient. The six-year capacity estimate for PSF shows a need to address Station 75 in Covington, and Stations 71,72, 73, 74, and 77 in Kent.Adjustments made to response areas in 2023, has all four stations in Tukwila within our set UHU range or below.Two new fire stations in Kent are in the planning stages and will be online within the next six-year window.These new stations will add capacity to help to keep system wide UHU within range. Six Year Financing Component As growth occurs,the demand for PSF services continues to also grow.Without increasing system capacity,the level of service will decline.This will lead to steadily increasing response times unless strategies for additional resources, and the staffing they require, can be funded. The Master Plan identified the need for more than $92 million in capital investments to maintain fire service concurrency through 2033.A previous update explored two options to reduce the near-term cost of capital. First, less expensive alternatives to some resources identified in the Master Plan have been chosen. Next, life cycles of apparatus have been modified providing additional resale value to apparatus. However, escalating construction costs and inflationary increases have outpaced those savings and increased the overall capital funding need. The additional cost associated with PSF's portion of funding construction of 72nd Ave South, and the cost of maintaining the apparatus and equipment transferred from SeaTac and Maple Valley has been added into the total capital costs established in the Master Plan. Combined with the cost saving measures associated with the new apparatus life cycle plan,the current cost of the total Master Plan has increased from $92.4 million to $114.5 million in 2023.The largest portion of this increase comes from hard construction costs of needed fire stations. Capital Resource purchases are organized in five general categories:Apparatus, Equipment, Facilities, Information Technology, and Infrastructure.A detailed list of planned purchases in the next six years for each category can be found in Appendix F.The table below identifies the capital expenses to be incurred this cycle bas ed upon the current priorities and levels of service. 4 J'Aft Puget Sound Fire _510 Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 18 of 41 PSF Capital Resource Planned Purchases Six Year Plan Expenses Resource Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 TOTAL Apparatus Purchases $ 5,791,000 $ 4,686,000 $ 4,303,500 $ 3,283,500 $ 2,546,000 $ 2,281,000 $ 22,891,000 Equipment Purchases $ 488,644 $ 372,519 $ 761,135 $ 653,058 $ 688,700 $ 883,008 $ 3,847,064 Facilities Purchases $ 1,250,490 $ 1,274,580 $ 1,045,725 $ 585,825 $ 498,225 $ 498,225 $ 5,153,070 IT Purchases $ 427,050 $ 470,850 $ 563,925 $ 509,175 $ 465,375 $ 684,375 $ 3,120,750 Infrastructure Purchases $ 6,701,400 1 $ $ $ $ $ - $ 6,701,400 TOTAL $ 14,658,584 $ 6,803,949 $ 6,674,285 $ 5,031,558 $ 4,198,300 $ 4,346,608 $ 41,713,284 Revenue Sources Resource Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 TOTAL $ 5,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,000,000 General Fund Transfer to Capital Impact Fees(Covington) $ 1,142,000 $ 1,187,680 $ 1,205,495 $ 1,223,578 $ 1,272,521 $ 1,323,422 $ 7,354,695 Impact Fees(Kent) $ 2,346,000 $ 2,381,190 $ 2,416,908 $ 1,241,931 $ 1,260,560 $ 1,279,469 $ 10,926,058 Impact Fees(Tukwila) $ 300,000 $ 309,000 $ 318,270 $ 327,818 $ 337,653 $ 347,782 $ 1,940,523 TOTAL $ 8,488,000 $ 3,568,870 $ 3,622,403 $ 2,465,509 $ 2,533,081 $ 2,602,890 $ 23,280,753 Capital Purchases & Expected Service Improvements PSF continues to work with suppliers as we emerge from the COVID pandemic. PSF has strategically placed orders for fire apparatus to ensure delivery dates that will help maintain concurrency. PSF aggressively looks for opportunities to relieve the long delays due to supply chain congestion.An example is the recent agreement to purchase available Brush Trucks that were part of a cancelled order from another jurisdiction. This allowed the PSF to get needed wildland resources available for deployment two to three years earlier than previously planned. PSF has two new fire station projects underway.The land acquisition has been completed for both stations, and the construction phase is anticipated to begin shortly.These two stations will serve the central portion of PSF.Other capital resources such as fire hose,firefighting clothing, and capital IT purchases continue to be funded by annual allocations. Expected System Impacts Capital Resource purchases are needed to maintain PSF's adopted level of service. In the coming year, PSF will continue to allocate capital funds for apparatus replacement,fire station maintenance, additional fire stations, additional apparatus, additional staffing, and capital resource replacement consistent with adopted schedules. PSF call volume is expected to grow consistent with historical trends identified in this plan.The predicted growth is high in the Cities of Covington,Tukwila, and Kent. PSF expects to see a need for additional resources Puget Sound Fire ��� Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 19 of 41 added to the fire stations serving those areas (increase capacity). No regional commercial projects, such as a new airport or major shopping mall, have been proposed. Current Capital Resources Inventory Capital resources for PSF consist of fire stations, fire apparatus, staff vehicles, and equipment, that is used to provide fire and rescue services.See Appendix G&H. The Public Protection Classification (PPC) is a community fire protection scoring system. This rating is a nationally recognized system that gives an indication of the strength of an organization's response system.The PPC score is based on a Fire Suppression Rating Schedule used by the Insurance Services Office (ISO). Communities are rated on a PPC score from one to 10. A score of one means the community has superior property fire protection, and 10 indicates that the area's fire protection does not meet ISO's minimum criteria. Currently, Seattle Fire Department is the only organization with a PPC 1 rating in Washington State.The Cities of Kent and Covington both have a PPC 3 rating. Deployment of resources heavily affects the PPC rating. Essentially the PPC rating is a good indicator of proper staffing and resource levels to meet the adopted level of service for the community. Additional response stations, apparatus, and staffing would be required to pursue a better PPC score. Fire Stations— PSF Service Areas Only (excluding contract areas) Emergency services, for capital planning purposes, originate from 12 fire stations located throughout the Covington/Kent/Tukwila service area (See Appendix E for Service Area Map).The average PSF fire station is over 30 years old with a capacity for three emergency response apparatus. Individual stations range in size from just over 5,000 to more than 26,000 square feet where training facilities are included. The average size of a fire station is 12,828 square feet. Currently, only stations 71 and 74 maintain more than one front-line response apparatus with minimum staffing levels. Support Services PSF has both standalone support facilities as well as support facilities incorporated within a fire station.Vehicle maintenance (Fire Garage) is in three facilities throughout the area. A large administrative building in Kent houses the South King County Fire Training Consortium, Performance Measurement, Information Technology, Community Relations, Finance, and the Fire Department Community Assistance and Education Services program (FDCARES). PSF Logistics has a warehouse facility in Kent. Community Risk Reduction, Emergency Management, and the Fire Marshal's office is in downtown Kent. Fire Stations in the PSF area host the Fire Administration, Human Resources, Health/Wellness, Chaplain Program, Facilities Division, and Fire Investigations.See Appendix G for a detailed list of all Facilities. Roadway- 72"a Ave South A notable project is a partnership with the City of Kent to complete an unfinished segment of roadway immediately north of Fire Station 76. The improved accessibility and reduction in travel times enhanced the APuget Sound Fire IR,- Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 20 of 41 coverage area for Fire Station 76. This project was finished on June 28, 2017. PSF contributed a total of$1.2 million to complete the project. Effects of New Development on Performance New development and growth require service capacity thus eroding the reliability and overall performance of fire service resources over time. Selected mitigation measures should be relational to the risk imposed by the development and its use.Time is the critical issue in the delivery of emergency services. PSF will pursue all appropriate mitigations necessary to maintain public safety and fire service concurrency through the provisions provided by the Growth Management Act (GMA), State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA),Washington State subdivision codes, land use regulations, and any other legally available method. Mitigation Methodology There are many options for PSF to mitigate impacts due to growth.The goal is to maintain concurrency,meaning that PSF resources are updated to meet the needs of the new growth and development.Acceptable mitigations may include one or more of the following options to achieve concurrency: Assess Fire Impact and Level of Service Fees. Require installation of automatic fire sprinkler systems to provide onsite fire control until PSF response units can arrive on scene. Require installation of monitored fire alarm and alerting systems to provide early alerting to PSF. Require installation of fire walls or other building separations to reduce fire flow. Require use of alternate construction materials or design to reduce chance of fire spread between structures and aid in rescue operations. Require installation of areas of refuge in multi-story stairwells. Require installation of incident reduction features such as grab bars in housing for seniors and residents with disabilities. Require installation of monitored medical alarms. Require installation of alarm monitored defibrillators in public areas of multi-family housing, places of assembly, and public buildings. Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 21 of 41 Developer agreements may be required for all developments occurring within PSF service area when Fire Impact or Level of Service fees alone, do not adequately mitigate the risk of the new development or ensure concurrency. PSF and the development applicant may enter into a mitigation agreement that clearly identifies all mitigation necessary to maintain fire service concurrency. All mitigation agreements between PSF and developers will be recorded as a lien against the property of the proposed development. Upon receipt of payment, PSF will promptly notify the appropriate authority having jurisdiction and remove any encumbrances recorded against the appropriate property. PSF staff will determine appropriate non-fee mitigations that may be necessary in addition to Fire Impact and Level of Service fees to provide for adequate built-in protection or mitigations necessary for fire service concurrency to the proposed development. PSF staff will consider developer submitted alternate mitigations and fee amounts presented in a study that provides acceptable alternatives to the mitigations found in this policy. Fee Process Fire Impact and Level of Service fees are assessed, and typically paid, concurrent with the local jurisdiction's permitting process. The fees are paid to the local jurisdiction and then transferred to PSF via interlocal agreements. PSF then uses those funds to maintain the adopted level of service concurrent with growth. Fire Impact& Level of Service Fees PSF uses two basic land use categories: residential, and commercial. Residential properties include both single family and multifamily (duplex, townhome, apartments) units. Commercial property is those uses that would otherwise be classified as industrial, business, retail sales, services, wholesale sales, storage, assisted care facilities, churches, medical facilities,etc. PSF's Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan identifies the resources and revenue needed to provide adequate service and maintain public health and safety over a 20-year planning cycle. Each year an updated Six Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is adopted.The CIP updates capital and equipment needs for the PSF. The CIP provides projected costs and data in the next six years to be used in the calculation of Fire Impact and Level of Service fees. Fee Formula Calculation Past demand for fire department services is used to predict future service level demand. The percentage of service use by new development and its impact on PSF Service Levels is used to determine appropriate and relational fees. Needed expenditures for capital improvements identified in PSF's Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan will be the basis for determining the capital and equipment costs which are used in calculating fees. Impact fees are established by using a formula based upon the cost of capital needs and service demand by property type.The overall goal is to distribute the costs of growth fairly and maintain the desired level of service 4Puget Sound Fire 4_601� Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation &Level of Service Policy Page 22 of 41 to the community.The Systemwide Projected Capital and Equipment figure is evaluated and updated each year commensurate with current financial conditions. Residential projects will pay the fee based on a "per unit"fee. Commercial projects will pay the fee on a"per square foot" basis. The fees are calculated using the distribution of incidents to Residential and Commercial properties, then distributed again based on calls to the subcategories outlined in the formula.The Effective Response Force factor is the resources needed to effectively manage the incident, and the New Development Share proportions the fee between Impact Fees and General Funding sources.The fees are then divided over the projected growth to render the fee. Fire Impact Fees Where Fire Impact fees have been adopted by the Authority Having Jurisdiction,a fee will be assessed based on a calculation formula found in Appendix A. The cities of Covington, Kent, and Tukwila have all adopted Fire Impact fees. Level of Service Fees In areas where Fire Impact fees have not been adopted by the authority having jurisdiction, each new development when proposed, and upon notice of application, will have their direct impacts assessed and their appropriate mitigation options determined by PSF staff.Appropriate Level of Service fees will be calculated and determined by applying the formula found in Appendix A.The cities of SeaTac, King County Fire District 37,and King County Fire District 43 have not adopted Fire Impact fees. Fee Collection Payment of fees will be collected by the authority having jurisdiction at time of permitting, or as defined by a required development agreement. Fire Impact or Level of Service fees will be based on the most recently adopted formula and fees. Any fees paid later than required will be subject to interest at a rate set by the authority having jurisdiction. All fees collected by the authority havingjurisdiction will be held in separate account and transferred to PSF with interest. If Fire Impact fees are not utilized within 10 years of receipt, a refund will be issued to the developer with interest. If a Level of Service fee is not utilized within five years of receipt, a refund will be issued to the developer with interest. PSF holds these fees in a reserve account used to fund capital needs identified in the Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan and updated in the CIP. Fee Exempt Properties Each authority having jurisdiction may provide an exemption from Fire Impact and Level of Service fees. A list of fee exempt properties can be found in the respective jurisdiction's ordinances. Fee Reduction for Residential Automatic Fire Sprinkler System A person installing a residential fire sprinkler system in a single-family home will not be required to pay the fire operations portion of the impact fee.The Fire Impact or Level of Service Fee will be reduced by 30%for qualified sprinkler systems. ® Puget Sound Fire `� Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 23 of 41 Fee Deferral Deferred collection of Impact fees for single-family residential construction may be deferred by the authority having jurisdiction. Deferring collection of the impact fee payment until final inspection; until certificate of occupancy or equivalent certification;or until the time of closing of the first sale of the property occurring after the issuance of the applicable building permit may be granted. Fee Adjustments, Exceptions, and Appeals The standard fee may be adjusted if the developer demonstrates that the fee was improperly calculated or, where unusual circumstances are identified by the authority having jurisdiction,the developer,or PSF staff.The fee may be adjusted to ensure that impact fees are imposed fairly. Adjustments will be determined jointly by the authority having jurisdiction and PSF. The developer may be entitled to a credit for the value of any dedication of land for, improvements to, or new construction of any system improvement provided by the developer to fire protection resources identified in the PSF Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan. In cases where a developer requests an independent fee calculation,adjustment,exception,or a credit pursuant to RCW 82.02.060(6), PSF's designee will consult with the authority having jurisdiction prior to making the final fee determination. A developer may provide studies and data to demonstrate that any factor used by PSF may not be appropriately applied to the development proposal.Any appeal about fee amounts will follow the process for appeals of the authority having jurisdiction. Fire Impact fees may be paid under protest to obtain a building permit or a manufactured home permit. Multi-family Common Space Credit Each unit in a multi-family development (Residential) will be credited 50 square feet toward common spaces (not including commercial spaces) in other parts of residential portions of the structure. Total common spaces within the residential portion of the structure exceeding the sum of 50 square feet times the number of total dwelling units will be assessed the per square foot fee identified in Appendix A for Commercial/Industrial properties for each square foot of common space exceeding the credited amount. Common space credits per dwelling unit will not apply to mixed use developments where separate commercial space, and associated parking spaces are not part of the common living areas of the multi-family space. `qw0� Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 24 of 41 IS PSF Funding Share There is currently an identified need for additional fire facilities and equipment in PSF related to growth that occurred prior to any further development. Total funding of PSF's Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan is split between PSF and new development. New development through Fire Impact fees or Level of Service fees will only be required to fund that share related to new growth. PSF will share in the expense of needed resources as outlined below: The percentage of capital and equipment costs beyond the growth share determined for new development. The actual construction and equipment costs exceeding original estimates. The unanticipated costs associated with implementing PSF Capital Improvement Plan. Advancing funds for capital expenses before total collection of Fire Impact or Level of Service fee contributions. Definitions Capital Improvements: Real estate, structures, or collective equipment purchases anticipated to have a cost of$5,000 or more and an expected useful life of at least 3 years. Community Risk Analysis (CPA): Process to identify and prioritize local risks, followed by the integrated and strategic investment of resources to reduce their occurrence and impact. Concentration: Deployment or spacing of resources in the PSF system. Concurrency:Adequate public facilities are available when the impacts of development occur, or within a specified time thereafter. Facilities and services necessary for public safety are adequate to serve new development without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards. Distribution: Deployment or spacing of fire stations and resources in the PSF system. Level of Service (LOS): PSF's adopted response time and performance expectations. Master Plan: Refers to the 2014 — 2033 Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Master Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan. Standard of Cover:Adopted policy that determine the distribution,concentration,and reliability of fixed and mobile response forces. rgi(mo)�,w Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 25 of 41 Reliability:The probability that the resources assigned to an area will be available to respond from within that area when needed. System:The overall process of PSF to respond to the needs of the community. System Capacity: A measurement of fire station bay space for response apparatus and accommodations for staffing.The amount of space for fire engines and firefighters. Acronyms CIP: Six Year Capital Improvement Plan CFAL Commission on Fire Accreditation International CPSE: Center for Public Safety Excellence (cpse.org) CRA: Community Risk Assessment CRA/SOC: Community Risk Assessment/Standard of Cover ERF: Effective Response Force FD37: King County Fire District Number 37 FD43: King County Fire District Number 43 GMA:Growth Management Act ISO: Insurance Services Office PSF: Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority LOS: Level of Service SOC:Standard of Cover NFPA: National Fire Protection Association SEPA:State Environmental Protection Act Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 26 of 41 References Capital Facilities Element(WAC 365-196-415) Excise Taxes (chapter 82.02 RCW) Fire Impact Fees (City of Kent Code chapter 12.15) Fire Impact Fee (City of Covington Code chapter 19.50) Fire Impact Fees (City of Tukwila Code chapter 16.26) Growth Management Act(chapter 36.70A RCW) Office of Financial Management(ofm.wa.gov) PSF Capital and Equipment Plan PSF Community Risk Assessment/Standard of Cover Vision 2050- Puget Sound Regional Council (psrc.org/planning-2050/vision-2050) �,` Pu et Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 27 of 41 Appendix A - Fee Formula Impact Fee Formula Calculation Systemwide Projected Residential Effective New Development Projected Growth Land Use Type Commercial Usage Factor ResponseP Impact Fee Capital and Equipment Split Force Share 2014-2035 Residential Single Family $114,510,809 51% 53% 1 90% 16,253 $ 1,713.96 Per Unit Multi-Family 47% 1.5 90% Units $ 2,279.89 Per Unit Commercial Commercial 20% 2.8 90% $ 2.14 Per Sq Ft Industrial Assisted Care Hospital 18% 3 90% $ 2.06 Per Sq Ft Medical Facility 13,206,735 Square Feet Education $114,510,809 49% 8% 2 90% $ 0.61 Per Sq Ft Assembly 10% 3 90% $ 1.15 Per Sq Ft Other Facilities 44% 1.1 90% $ 1.85 Per Sq Ft Common Space Impact Fee Formula Definitions • Land Use Type: Defines the land use types and structures that are assessed impact fees. • System wide Capital and Equipment:The construction and equipment costs found in the PSF Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan.This cost is annually updated in the PSF Capital Improvement Plan. • Residential/Commercial Split: Percentage of annual emergency responses to each Land Use Type. • Usage Factor:The specific use of fire services by NFIRS land use category. Use factors are based on actual incident rates to each category of Land Use Type. • Effective Response Force Factor:The minimum amount of staffing and equipment that must reach a specific emergency location within the maximum adopted level of service time capable of fire suppression, medical and/or another incident mitigation. • New Development Share: Represents the portion of Capital and Equipment costs assigned to new development. New Development share is used to assure that new development pays only for improvements related to growth and maintenance of fire service concurrency. • Projected Growth:The 20-year growth projections,found in PSF's Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan and updated in PSF's Capital Improvement Plan, are the basis for PSF calculations of future dwelling units and future square-footage of commercial projects. • Impact Fee Amount: Represents the maximum fee to be paid by new development for each specific property type. 4=�` Puget Sound Fire ®) Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 28 of 41 Appendix B - Single Family Worksheet Guide °"RAT PUGET SOUND REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY 8aut+a i NT C1 ,iw 1.,Y A C;. ',:r0 i i I:D' F1.-4F tGF f.,.,; Impact Fee Calculation for New Development Single Family Worksheet Project Permit# Project Address: Project City: Project Parcel No. Impact Fee Category (select one) ❑ Single-Family $ 1,713.96 1 per unit ❑ Single-Family w/Sprinkler 1 $ 1,199.77 1 per unit 30% Discount for Residential Sprinkler System Total Impact Fee Is Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 29 of 41 Appendix C - Multi-Family Worksheet Guide p'Q"' PUGET SOUND ' REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY aau lNTt;N. _ . Impact Fee Calculation for New Development Multi-Family Worksheet Project Permit # Project Address: Project City: Project Parcel No. Impact Fee Category Multi-Family (a) $ 2,279.89 Total Number of Residential Units (b) Total Common Space (SF) (c) (b) x 50 SF (Credit) (d) (c) - (d) Adjusted Common Space (e) Common Space Rate per SF (f) $ 1.85 Common Space Fee (e) x (f) (g) $ (a) x (b) Impact Fees for all Units (h) $ (g) + (h) Total Impact Fees $ 40` AM, Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 30 of 41 Appendix D - Commercial Worksheet Guide Q"aEt PUGET SOUND REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY �out+� k`,JcRINAT"CN ,1.,`(A� CRECIT�,�� . F .a,:F r;, Impact Fee Calculation for New Development Commercial Worksheet Project Permit # Project Address: Project City: Project Parcel No. Impact Fee Category ❑ Commercial/Industrial/Common $ 2.14 per SF ❑ Asst. Care/Hospital/Medical $ 2.06 per SF ❑ Mercantile/Education $ 0.61 per SF ❑ Assembly $ 1.15 per SF ❑ Other Facilities/Common Space $ 1.85 per SF Impact Fee Rate (a) $ Total SF of Project (b) (a) x (b) Total Impact Fees $ � Puget Sound Fire �W Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 31 of 41 Appendix E - PSF Service Area Map N N F? Q � COfO C m `m 0001 in 0 a cn Q y ® c cr 3 Cn A G V x , o $ Q ti m 0 C U) Z W N U1 ❑ 99 V a En M CO M �■ .. Q ❑ Ut'� T s;i - ar -n V V C..) �• M c- m ' D 00 > > o CO = TQ ODL W -, �, r 50 yf /.111 '05- Lr G m f��` Puget Sound Fire IACON� Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 32 of 41 Appendix F - Planned Capital Purchases Apparatus Apparatus Capital Resource Planned Purchases Six Year Plan Year Resource Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 1995 Ford F350 XL $ 75,000 $ $ $ $ $ 1995 Forklift $ $ 50,000 $ $ $ $ 1999 H&W(Air Truck) $ - $ - $ $ $ 200,000 $ 200,000 2005 Genie Scissor Lift $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ $ $ - $ 2005 Wells Utility Trailer $ - $ 30,000 $ $ $ $ - 2005 Welfs Utility Trailer $ $ 30,000 $ $ $ $ 2005 Polaris(ATV) $ $ 15,000 $ $ $ $ 2005 Iron Eagle Trailer $ $ 15,000 $ $ $ $ 2006 Top Hat(Pump Simulator) $ $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ $ $ 2006 Ford F450 $ $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ $ 2006 Ford F450 $ $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ $ - 2007 Trail Blazer(WMD) $ $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ $ - 2007 Haulmark Trailer $ $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ $ - 2007 Freightliner Business Class M2 $ $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ $ - 2007 Freightliner Business Class M2 $ $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ $ - 2012 Ford Transit Connect XLT Van $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ $ - 2012 Sutphen Tender $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 2013 International Terrastar Aid Car $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ - 2013 International Terrastar Aid Car $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ - 2014 Pierce ArrowXT Fire Engine $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 2014 CET Fire Pump Simulator $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 2015 Ford K1 C Van $ $ $ 37,500 $ 37,500 $ $ - 2015 jFord E1 C Van $ $ $ 37,500 $ 37,500 $ $ 2015 Nissan NV200 Van $ $ $ 37,500 $ 37,500 $ - $ 2015 Nissan NV200 Van $ $ $ 37,500 $ 37,500 $ $ 2015 Ford Transit 350 Van $ $ $ 37,500 $ 37,500 $ $ 2016 Pierce Quantum Fire Engine $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 350,000 $ - $ $ 2016 Pierce Quantum Fire Engine $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 350,000 $ $ $ 2016 Haulmark Trailer $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ $ $ - 2016 Wooldridge Alaskan II Rescue Boat $ - $ - $ - $ $ $ 250,000 2016 International Terrastar Aid Car $ 63,000 $ 63,000 $ 63,000 $ 63,000 $ 63,000 $ 63,000 2016 Freightliner $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 2016 Freightliner $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 2016 International Terrastar Aid Car $ 63,000 $ 63,000 $ 63,000 $ 63,000 $ 63,000 $ 63,000 2016 Freightliner $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 2016 Freightliner $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 2017 Pierce Enforcer Fire Engine $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ - 2017 Pierce Enforcer Fire Engine $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ - 2017 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 2017 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 $ $ - $ $ - $ - $ 75,000 2017 Chevrolet Tahoe $ $ - $ $ - $ $ 50,000 2017 Ford Utility-Police $ $ - $ $ - $ $ 50,000 2017 Ford Transit Van $ $ - $ $ - $ $ 50,000 2017 Ford Utility-Police $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ 50,000 2017 Ford Expedition $ $ - $ $ $ $ 50,000 2017 Ford Expedition $ $ - $ $ $ $ 50,000 � '2� Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation& Level of Service Policy Page 33 of 41 Apparatus cont. 2018 Pierce Enforcer Fire Engine $ $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 2018 Pierce Enforcer Fire Engine $ $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 2018 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 $ $ $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 2018 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 $ $ $ $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 2018 Chevrolet Silverado 3300 $ $ $ $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 2018 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 $ $ S 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 2019 Pierce Enforcer Fire Engine $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 300,000 2019 Pierce Enforcer Fire Engine $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 300,000 $ 200,000 2019 Pierce Enforcer Fire Engine $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 300,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 2023 Skeeter Brush Truck $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 2023 Four(4)Fire Engines (70,72,75, 76) $ 1,745,000 $ $ $ $ $ 2023 Escape(Order New) $ 40,000 $ $ $ $ $ 2023 HazMat Squads(Order New) $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ $ $ $ 2023 HazMat Squads(Order New) $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ $ $ $ 2026 Pierce Enforcer Fire Engine(73) $ 330,000 $ 330,000 $ 340,000 $ $ $ 2026 Pierce Enforcer Fire Engine(74) $ 330,000 1 $ 340,000 $ 330,000 $ $ $ Equipment Equipment Capital Resource Planned Purchases Six Year Plan Resource Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 PPE Ensemble/Ballistic Vests $ 300,000 $ 306,000 $ 274,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 Thermal Imaging Cameras $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 41,000 $ - Defib units(Operations) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 Fire Hose $ 18,000 $ 18,000 $ 18,000 $ 18,000 $ 18,000 $ 18,000 Forklift $ - $ - $ 20,000 $ - $ - $ - Air Packs(SCBAs) $ $ $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 Air Compressor(Sta.46) $ $ $ 40,000 $ - $ - $ - Air Compressor(Sta.74) $ $ $ - $ $ 40,000 $ - Air Compressor (Sta.75) $ $ $ - $ $ - $ 40,000 FIT Testing Machines(4) $ $ $ 60,000 $ $ $ - Rescue Tools $ 50,000 $ S - $ $ $ 110,000 HazMat $ 57,000 $ $ $ $ $ - Facilities Facilities Capital Resource Planned Purchases Six Year Plan Resource Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Sta.71 Bay Door Replacement $ 50,000 $ $ $ $ $ Sta.80 Exhaust Extraction System Buildout $ 20,000 $ $ $ $ $ Puget Sound Fire S, Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 34 of 41 Information Technology Information Technology Capital Resource Planned Purchases Six Year Plan Resource Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Networking Switching $ - $ 35,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 ERP Replacement $ 390,000 $ 390,000 $ 390,000 $ 390,000 $ 390,000 $ 390,000 Timekeeping replacement $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Infrastructure Infrastructure Capital Resource Planned Purchases Six Year Plan Resource Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Station 70(land) $ 1,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ Drill Field Conversion-(SKCFTC) $ 5,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ 72nd Ave East Extension(Road) $ 120,000 $ $ $ $ $ Station 70(New) $ 5,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ RPuget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 35 of 41 Appendix G - PSF Current Facilities Inventory Fire Stations Fire Stations Station Number Address city #of Bays #of Dorms Sleeps Station 45 3011 South 200th Street SeaTac 2 4 4 Station 46 3521 South 17th Street SeaTac 5 10 10 Station 51 17951 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila 2 8 8 Station 52 15447 65th Ave South Tukwila 3 8 8 Station 53 4202 South 115th Street Tukwila 2 4 4 Station 54 4237 South 144th Street Tukwila 2 7 7 Station 70(Leased to Kent PD) 407 North Washington Avenue Kent N/A N/A N/A Station 71 504 West Crow Street Kent 3 8 8 Station 72 25620 140th Avenue SE Kent 3 3 1 6 Station 73 26512 Military Road South Kent 3 4 6 Station 74 24611 116th Avenue SE Kent 3 8 13 Station 75 15635 SE 272 Street Kent 3 7 12 Station 76 20676 72nd Avenue South Kent 3 4 6 Station 77 20717 132nd Avenue SE Kent 3 5 12 Station 78 17820 SE 256th Street Covington 12 6 1 12 Station 79 (Vacant Land) 21600 108th Avenue SE Kent N/A N/A N/A Station 80 23775 SE 264th Street Maple Valley 4 4 4 Station 81 22225 SE 231 st Street Maple Valley 4 7 7 Station 82 27519 SE Kent-Kangley Road Ravensdale 2 4 4 Station 83 27250 216th Avenue SE Maple Valley 1 3 3 Station 84 16855 194th Avenue SE Renton 2 4 4 Station 85 27605 SE 208th Street Maple Valley 2 4 4 Station 86(Vacant Land) 124400 SE 216th Street IMaple Valley I N/A N/A N/A Administration &Training Facilities Administration&Training Facilities Hose Tower-71 504 West Crow Street Kent N/A N/A N/A Police/Fire Training 24523 116th Avenue SE Kent N/A N/A N/A Drill Tower-74 24523 116th Avenue SE Kent N/A N/A N/A Amateur Radio Building 24523 116th Avenue SE Kent N/A N/A N/A Recruit Academy Instructor Office 24425 116th Avenue SE Kent N/A N/A N/A Community Risk Reduction 400 West Gowe Street,Suite 414 Kent N/A N/A N/A PSF Community Relations 20811 84th Avenue South,Suite 101A Kent N/A N/A N/A PSF Future Office/Training Space 20811 84th Avenue South,Suite 101 B Kent N/A N/A N/A SKCFTC/KCM1 20811 84th Avenue South,Suite 102&106 Kent N/A N/A N/A King County E-911 20811 84th Avenue South,Suite 103&105 Kent N/A N/A N/A SKCFTC Classroom 20811 84th Avenue South,Suite 108 Kent N/A N/A N/A PSF/SKCFTC Breakout Room 20811 84th Avenue South,Suite 109 Kent N/A N/A N/A Finance/EMS 20811 84th Avenue South,Suite 110 Kent N/A N/A N/A PSF/SKCFTC Multi-Purpose Room 20811 84th Avenue South,Suite 111 Kent N/A N/A N/A Performance Measurement 20811 84th Avenue South,Suite 112 Kent N/A N/A N/A Information Technology 20811 84th Avenue South,Suite 114 Kent N/A N/A N/A PSF Future Office/Training Space 20811 84th Avenue South,Suite 113&115 Kent N/A N/A N/A Wellness Center 20811 84th Avenue South,Suite 116 lKent N/A N/A N/A \��� Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 36 of 41 Maintenance&Logistics Facilities Maintenance&Logistics Fire Garage-76 20678 72nd Avenue South Kent 6 N/A N/A Fire Garage-81 22225 SE 231st Street Maple Valley 2 N/A N/A Facilities Workshop 15635 SE 272 Street Kent N/A N/A N/A Logistics 8320 South 208th Street,Suite H-110 Kent N/A N/A N/A � of Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 37 of 41 Appendix H — PSF Current Apparatus Inventory Fire Engines Fire Engines &Tenders 1997 Pierce Quantum 2015 Freightliner Tender 2000 Pierce Quantum 2016 Pierce Quantum 2001 Pierce Quantum 2016 Pierce Quantum 2001 Pierce Quantum 2017 Pierce Enforcer 2001 Pierce Quantum 2017 Pierce Enforcer 2004 Pierce Quantum 2018 Pierce Enforcer 2004 Pierce Quantum 2018 Pierce Enforcer 2005 Pierce Quantum 2019 Pierce Enforcer 2006 Sutphen Monarch 2019 Pierce Enforcer 2006 Sutphen Monarch 2019 Pierce Enforcer 2008 Pierce Quantum 2019 Pierce Velocity 2010 Pierce Quantum Skyboom 2019 Pierce Velocity 2010 Pierce Quantum Skyboom 2022 Pierce Enforcer 2010 Sutphen Monarch 2022 Pierce Enforcer 2012 Sutphen Tender 2022 Pierce Enforcer 2014 Pierce Velocity 2022 Pierce Enforcer 2014 Pierce Velocity 2023 Pierce Enforcer 2015 Freightliner Tender 2023 Pierce Enforcer Ladder Trucks, Brush Trucks, and Fire Boats Aerial Ladder Trucks Wildland Brush Trucks 2006 Pierce Aerial Ladder 1996 International Brush Truck 2006 Pierce Quantum Tiller 2003 Ford F350 Brush Truck 2014 Pierce Arrow Tiller 2022 Ford F550 Brush Truck 2019 Pierce Velocity Aerial Ladder 2023 BME Freightliner Brush Truck 2021 Pierce Enforcer Tiller 2023 BME Freightliner Brush Truck Fire Boats 2023 Skeeter Brush Truck 2010 Woolridge Alaskan Boat 2016 Woolridge Alaskan II Boat AA Puget Sound Fire \� � Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation &Level of Service Policy Page 38 of 41 Staff Vehicles Staff Vehicles 1999 Chevrolet Suburban 2017 Ford SUV 2000 Ford Expedition 2017 Ford SUV 2003 Chevrolet Suburban 2017 Chevrolet Tahoe 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe 2018 Ford Explorer- Police 2005 Chevrolet Suburban 2018 Ford Explorer- Police 2006 Ford Expedition 2019 Chevrolet Tahoe 2006 Ford Expedition 2019 Chevrolet Tahoe 2006 Ford Expedition 2020 Ford Explorer Interceptor 2007 Ford Expedition 2022 Ford Escape Hybrid 2008 Ford Escape 2022 Ford Escape Hybrid 2008 Ford Escape 2022 Ford Escape Hybrid 2008 Ford Escape 2022 Ford Escape Hybrid 2008 Ford Escape 2022 Ford Escape Hybrid 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe 2022 Ford Escape Hybrid 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe 2022 Ford Escape Hybrid 2012 Toyota FJ CRUISER 2022 Ford Escape Hybrid 2012 Ford Escape 2022 Ford Explorer Interceptor 2013 Chevrolet Suburban 2022 Ford Explorer Interceptor 2014 Chevrolet Tahoe 2022 Ford Explorer Interceptor 2017 Ford Expedition 2022 Ford Explorer Interceptor 2017 Ford Expedition 2023 Ford Explorer Interceptor 2017 Ford SUV Utility Apparatus Utility Apparatus 1990 Hyster Forklift 2010 jExrnark Riding Lawnmower 1995 Toyota Forklift 2011 John Deere Gator ATV 1999 Freightliner Air Truck 2012 Club Car Carryall 1500 ATV 2005 Genie Scissor Lift 2016 Reach Truck 2007 Freightliner Service Truck 2020 Genie Scissor Lift 2008 linternational SVI Rescue/Air � � Puget Sound Fire rf Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 39 of41 Pickup&Utility Trucks Pickup & Utility Trucks 1995 Ford F250 XL 2017 IChevrolet Silverado 1500 1995 Ford F350 XL Flatbed Truck 2017 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 2004 Ford F350 2017 Ford F250 2006 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 2018 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 2006 Ford F450 2018 Chevrolet Silverado 2007 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 2019 Ford F250 2008 Ford F350 2019 Ford F250 2008 Ford F350 2019 Ford F350 2010 Ford F550 2019 Ford F350 2011 Ford F350 2020 Ford F250 2012 Ford F350 2022 Ram 2500 Service Truck 2016 Ford F250 2022 Ram 2500 Service Truck Aid Cars (Ambulances) Aid Cars 2005 International Aid Car 2015 International Aid Car 2005 International Aid Car 2019 Ford F550 Aid Car 2007 Ford E350 Aid Car 2019 Ford F550 Aid Car 2013 International Aid Car 2021 Dodge 4500 Aid Car 2013 International Aid Car Trailers Trailers 1978 Custom Trailer 2010 EZ Loader Trailer 1990 Lawnmower Trailer 2010 Wells Cargo Utility Trailer 1994 Spirit Trailer 2010 Wells Cargo Utility Trailer 2000 Avenger HazMat Trailer 2011 Falcon Utility Trailer 2003 Haulmark Trailer 2012 Eagle Trailer 2005 Wells Cargo Utility Trailer 2014 Pump Simulator Trailer 2005 Whiteman Light Trailer 2016 Midsota Trailer 2005 Haulmark Trailer 2016 Haulmark Trailer 2006 Top Hat Trailer 2016 JAIlmand Light Trailer 2007 Haulmark Trailer 2017 PJ HazMat Trailer 2007 Trailblazer Trailer 2017 PJ HazMat Trailer 2009 EZ Loader Trailer 2018 EZ Loader Trailer Puget Sound Fire �� Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation&Level of Service Policy Page 40 of 41 Vans Vans 1994 Ford E150 Van 2015 Ford Transit 350 Van 2001 GMC Safari Van 2015 Ford Transit Van 2012 Ford Transit Connect XLT Van 2015 Ford Transit Van 2015 Nissan NV200 Van 2017 Ford Transit Van 2015 Nissan NV200 Van 2020 Ford Transit Connect Van Air Compressors Air Compressors Cascade Compressor Cascade Compressor Cascade Compressor Cascade Compressor Cascade Compressor Cascade Compressor Cascade Compressor Cascade Compressor (Mobile) Cascade Compressor Cascade Compressor (Mobile) Cascade Compressor 40� Puget Sound Fire —WwO Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation &Level of Service Policy Page 41 of 41 Exhibit C - Auburn CFP Auburn School District No. 408 C It t F ceitilteies Pt n 2023 through 2029 Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors June 12, 2023. P►UguRIV SCHOOL DISTRICT ` ENGAGE• EDUCATE• EMPOWER U R u a IV 1%t SCHOOL DISTRICT ENGAGE • EDUCATE • EMPOWER 91S Fourth Street SE Auburn, Washington 98002 (2S3) 931-4900 Serving Students in: City of Auburn City of Algona City of Kent City of Pacific City of Black Diamond Unincorporated King County Board of Directors Tracy Arnold Valerie Gonzales Arlista Holman Sheilia McLaughlin Laura Theimer Dr. Alan Spicciati, Superintendent Capital Facilities Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I Executive Summary Page 3 SECTION II Enrollment Projections and Student Generation Factors Page 8 SECTION III Standard of Service Page 17 SECTION IV Inventory of Facilities Page 24 SECTION V Student Capacity Page 28 SECTION VI Capital Construction Plan Page 31 SECTION VII Impact Fees Page 33 Capital Facilities Plan SECTION I - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This six-year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Auburn School District (the "District") as the District's principal planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This Plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2023. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic long-range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period; other factors and trends in the use of facilities; and other needs of the District as may be required. However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this six-year Capital Facilities Plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and within the Cities of Auburn, Black Diamond and Kent; the King County Council, the City of Auburn, the City of Black Diamond, and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction's respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of Algona and Pacific, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act and the local ordinances, this Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. The Plan establishes the District's "Standard of Service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the District's specific needs. Capital Facilities Plan In general, the District's current standard provides that class size for grades K-3 should not exceed 17 students and class size for grades 4-5 should not exceed 27 students. When averaged over the six elementary school grades, this computes to 20.33 students per classroom. Class size for grade 6 should not exceed 27 students and class size for grades 7 and 8 should not exceed 2833 students. When averaged over the three middle school grades, this computes to 28.02 students per classroom. Class size for 9-12 should not exceed 28.74 students, with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers. Decisions by current legislative actions may create the need for additional classrooms. (See Section III Standard of Service for more specific information.) The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this Standard of Service and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The District's 2022-23 permanent capacity was 18,796. The actual number of individual students was 17,OS9 as of October 1, 2022. (See Section V for more specific information.) In the spring of 2016, the Board determined to move forward with the replacement of six schools and the construction of two new elementary schools. The project was placed before the voters in November 2016 and the bond passed at 62.83%. The first of the projects, the replacement of Olympic Middle School, started construction in May 2018 and opened in Fall 2019. The district's new elementary, Bowman Creek Elementary, started construction in May 2019 and opened in August 2020. Construction for replacement of Dick Scobee Elementary School started in June 2019 and the school opened in August 2020. Construction of Willow Crest Elementary School and construction of the replacement Pioneer Elementary School started May 2020 and both opened in August 2021. For the 2021-22 school year, Willow Crest Elementary served as the temporary home for Lea Hill Elementary School which started the replacement construction process in May 2021 and opened as its own school in August 2022. Construction for replacement of Chinook Elementary School started in May 2021 and the new school opened in August 2022 as well. Construction for replacement of Terminal Park Elementary School began in May 2022 and is scheduled to open in August 2023. Capital Facilities Plan The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn, City of Black Diamond and City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the fiscal impacts incurred by a district experiencing growth and development. Section VII sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multi-family dwelling units. The student generation factors have been developed using the students who actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and multi-family developments constructed in the last five years. The method of collecting the data is with the use of GIS mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County GIS, data from Davis Demographics and integration of the mapping with student data from the District's student data system. This method gives the District actual student generation numbers for each grade span for identified developments. Capital Facilities Plan Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2022 Capital Facilities Plan that are a part of the 2023 Plan. The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference. SECTION I Executive Summary A. Updated to reflect new information within the Plan. B. Summary level list of changes from previous year. SECTION II Enrollment Projections and Student Generation Factors A. Updated projections. SECTION III Standard of Service A. Updated to reflect the current number of classrooms allocated to non-standard classroom uses. SECTION IV Inventory of Facilities A. Move 2 portables from Arthur Jacobsen Elementary and 2 portables from Ilalko Elementa ry to Au bu rn High School. B. Move 1 portable from Arthur Jacobsen Elementary and 3 portables from Ilalko Elementary to Auburn Mountainview High School. c. Move 1 portable from Arthur Jacobsen Elementary to Auburn Riverside High School. D. Move 1 portable from Gildo Rey Elementary and 2 portables from Lake View Elementary to Cascade Middle School. E. Add 1 portable to Cascade Middle School. Section V Student Capacity A. The 12 portables to be relocated and one new portable to be added in July 2024 are needed to accommodate enrollment increases at our middle and high schools. Capital Facilities Plan CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2022 TO 2023 DATA ELEMENTS CFP 2022 CFP 2023 EXPLANATION Student Generation Consistent with King County Ordinance Factors 11621, Student Generation Factors are Single Family calculated by the school district based on Elementary 0.3010 0.303 district records of average actual student Middle School 0.1460 0.133 generation rates for new developments High School 0.1550 0.151 constructed over the last five years. Multi-Family Elementary 0.3920 0.440 Middle School 0.1350 0.150 High School 0.1530 0.172 School Construction Costs Middle School $134,320,000 $143,000,000 From new school construction cost estimates in April 2023. Site Acquisition Updated estimate based on 10%annual Costs $489,248 $513,509 inflation. Cost per Acre Area Cost Updated to current OSPI schedule. (May Allowance $246.83 $246.83 2023) Boeckhlndex Updated to current OSPI schedule (May Match %-State 63.83% 64.58% 2023) Match % - District 36.17% 35.42% Computed District Average Assessed Valuation Updated from March 2023 King County ' =y Single Family $458,409 $573,704 Dept.of Assessments data. Updated from March 2023 King County Multi-Famil y $223,737 $270,892 Dept.of Assessments data using average assessed valuation for apartments and condominiums. Debt Sery Tax Rate $2.13 $1.84 Current Fiscal Year General Obligation 2.45% 3.58% Current Rate - February 2023 Bond Interest Rate (Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-14) t Capital Facilities Plan SECTION II - ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS AND STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Student Enrollment Projections Projection techniques give consideration to historical and current data as a basis for forecasting the future. In addition, certain assumptions must be made about the variables in the data being used. Forecasting can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future or from the known to the unknown. The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, psychological, economic, and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection. An example of this is with the COVID-19 pandemic. The logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today and will be in the future. It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over time. The basis of enrollment projections in the Auburn School District has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group of students in a grade level as it progresses through time. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. If all students in one grade level progress to the next, the cohort number would be 1.00. If fewer students from the group progress the number will be less than 1. The district has used this method with varying years of history (3 years, 6 yea rs, 10 years and 13 years) as well as weighted factors to study several projections. Additionally, the District contracted with Davis Demographics to develop and analyze demographic data relevant to the District's facility planning efforts. The report created by Davis Demographics identifies and informs the District of the trends occurring in the community, how these trends may affect future student populations, and assists in illustrating facility adjustments that may be necessary to accommodate the potential student population shifts. Davis' Ten-Year Forecast Methodology uses factors including the calculation of Capital Facilities Plan incoming kindergarten classes, additional students from new housing, the effects of student mobility and a detailed review of planned residential development within the District. The data from the report is a snapshot of the current and potential student populations based on the data gathered in fall 2022. Population demographics change, development plans change, funding opportunities can change, and District priorities can change. The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact.This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections. Monitoring deviation is critical to the viability and creditably of the projections derived by these techniques. q,¢`,. �r Capital Facilities Plan Overview of 2022-23 Enrollment Projections Table 1 shows historical enrollment for the October 1 count in the Auburn School District over the past 20 years.The data shows overall average growth over the recent 10 years is 1.69%. It is important to note this average includes a 4.22%decrease in October 2020 enrollment due to the COVID pandemic. TABLE 1 Historical Enrollmentl:October 1 Actuals,K-12(No IRS,OD,GA)Source:OSPI 1251H GRADE 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21* 21-22* 22-23 KDG 921 892 955 940 995 998 1,032 1,010 1,029 1,098 1,170 1,232 1,198 1,237 1,261 1,271 1,291 1,038 1,227 1,341 1 982 960 963 1,012 995 1,014 1,033 1,066 1,068 1,089 1,188 1,219 1,279 1,210 1,276 1,290 1,314 1,236 1,185 1,304 2 909 992 963 1,001 1,019 1,024 998 1,016 1,097 1,083 1,124 1,196 1,289 1,300 1,251 1,311 1,295 1,243 1,249 1,241 3 996 918 1,002 1,031 997 1,048 993 1,013 996 1,111 1,125 1,136 1,232 1,317 1,328 1,275 1,320 1,243 1,264 1,324 4 947 1,016 939 1,049 1,057 1,045 1,073 1,024 1,022 1,038 1,123 1,156 1,170 1,237 1,328 1,378 1,316 1,257 1,255 1,322 S 1,018 956 1,065 998 1,077 1,070 1,030 1,079 1,017 1,070 1,075 1,122 1,172 1,199 1,269 1,345 1,361 1,294 1,251 1,296 6 1,111 1,020 1,004 1,061 1,008 1,096 1,040 1,041 1,063 1,041 1,076 1,059 1,116 1,152 1,207 1,275 1,337 1,306 1,233 1,227 7 1,131 1,124 1,028 1,014 1,057 1,034 1,125 1,060 1,032 1,086 1,072 1,091 1,099 1,132 1,194 1,232 1,295 1,319 1,304 1,267 8 1,052 1,130 1,137 1,069 1,033 1,076 1,031 1,112 1,046 1,018 1,116 1,088 1,136 1,108 1,183 1,213 1,236 1,264 1,312 1,315 9 1,464 1,459 1,379 1,372 1,337 1,257 1,245 1,221 1,273 1,200 1,159 1,275 1,229 1,261 1,257 1,372 1,399 1,351 1,386 1,455 10 1,246 1,260 1,383 1,400 1,367 1,341 1,277 1,238 1,168 1,278 1,229 1,169 1,316 1,248 1,300 1,313 1,410 1,376 1,388 1,416 11 991 1,019 1,153 1,294 1,305 1,304 1,269 1,212 1,177 1,116 1,187 1,169 1,111 1,248 1,188 1,198 1,218 1,174 1,299 1,300 12 841 833 989 1,068 1,176 1,259 1,319 1,251 1,220 1,231 1,186 1,218 1,175 1,104 1,266 1,126 1,113 1,089 1,248 1,251 TOTALS 13,609 13,579 13,960 14,309 14,423 14,566 14,465 14,343 14,208 14,459 14,830 15,130 15,522 15,753 16,308 16,599 16,905 16,190 16,601 17,059 Student Gain/Loss 351 349 114 143 -101 -122 -135 251 371 300 392 231 555 291 306 -715 411 458 Percent Gain/Loss 12,58% 2.50% 0.80% 0.99% -0.69% -0.84% -0.94% 1.77% 2.57% 2,02%12,59% 1.49% 3.52% 1.78% 1.84% -4.23% 2.54% 2.76% Average Student Gain/Loss for Recent 10 years 260 *COVID Pandemic Average Percent Gain/Loss for Recent 10 years 1.69% Capital Facilities Plan Some of the assumptions made in calculating projections for the 2023-24 school year are: 1. Local birth data is collected and incorporated into forecasting future kindergarten students. Births trended upward from 2019 to 2021. It is estimated that the pattern shown in recent area births will be reflected in future kindergarten classes between 2023-24 to 2026-27. 2. Student retention as they progress through the grades is the most impactful factor when calculating future student populations. Over SO% of the total grade transitions are above 1.0 meaning students continue their education from grade to grade and there is an increased number of students as well. 3. Approximately 69 new single-family detached units are planned to be built within the District in the next ten years. It is estimated that the planned units may generate 37 K-12 students. 4. The number of out-of-District students (students who do not reside within the district boundaries) has been incorporated into the forecasts by calculating their current overall percentage of student enrollment, then applying the ratio to future years, and adding it to the resident forecasts. The data calculated from the factors above indicate an overall increase over the next ten years. Assuming the out-of-district student proportion of the overall enrollment stays at its current level, total K-12 enrollment is forecasted to increase by approximately 9% to about 18,637 students by the 2032-33 school year. Table 2 below shows the District Forecast Summary for the next S years. r I I li' Y ifa' 7 G 44 d t s� s ," Capital Facilities Plan Table 2: Student Enrollment Projections 2023-2027 GRADE 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 In-District Students KDG 1,388 1,251 1,289 1,339 1,315 1,315 1 1,366 1,453 1,309 1,348 1,402 1,376 2 1,257 1,364 1,450 1,306 1,345 1,398 3 1,220 1,278 1,387 1,475 1,329 1,368 4 1,290 1,228 1,285 1,397 1,485 1,337 5 1,288 1,299 1,238 1,292 1,403 1,491 6 1,236 1,266 1,276 1,218 1,272 1,381 7 1,211 1,245 1,275 1,287 1,225 1,283 8 1,232 1,210 1,242 1,272 1,281 1,220 9 1,320 1,268 1,245 1,277 1,308 1,321 10 1,355 1,335 1,282 1,260 1,293 1,325 11 1,188 1,246 1,229 1,179 1,156 1,190 12 1,135 1,149 1,207 1,189 1,140 1,118 SUBTOTAL 16,486 16,592 16,714 16,839 16,954 17,124 Out-of-District Students K-5 271 274 276 283 288 288 6-8 89 90 92 91 92 94 9-12 498 498 495 489 488 494 SUBTOTAL 858 862 863 863 868 876 TOTAL STUDENTS K-5 8,080 8,147 8,234 8,440 8,567 8,573 6-8 3,768 3,811 3,885 3,868 3,870 3,978 9-12 5,496 5,496 5,458 5,394 5,385 5,448 GRAND TOTAL K-12 17,344 17,454 17,577 17,702 17,822 17,999 Capital Facilities Plan Student Generation Factors Planned residential development data is collected to determine the number of new residential units that may be built in the future. The projected number of units will have the appropriate Student Generation Factor applied to estimate the number of new students that planned residential development might yield. Planned residential development data was obtained through discussions with city agencies, counties, and major developers within the district boundaries. The student population by residence includes all approved and tentative tract maps in addition to any planned or proposed development that possibly will occur within the project timeframe. The planned residential development information and phasing estimates are a snapshot of the District as of this time. The information may change and is updated annually. Closely related to the planned residential development units are Student Generation Factors. When applied to planned residential development units, the Student Generation Factors determine how many additional students may be generated from new construction within the District. Two sets of data are used to calculate Student Generation Factors: current student enrollment and current housing data. This information associates each student with a housing unit. Two general housing categories are 'F. analyzed: Single Family and Multi-Family. Data showing the number of students generated from previous single- and multi-family developments generates the Student Generation Factor to be applied to future developments. The tables on the next two pages show the information for both single-and multi-family developments. The components include: J. • "Development Name" is a list of developments in various stages of , occupancy. • "Year of Full Occupancy" is important because fully-occupied developments stay on the list for five years contributing to the Student ` Generation Factor. Once the five years is up, the development is removed from the list. Capital Facilities Plan • Also included for each development listed is the number of units, the amount of current units occupancy and the remaining units to be occupied. • "Feeder Pattern" shows the elementary school associated with each development. • "Actual Students" is the data of actual students generated from the units already occupied. • "Student Generation Factors" is the calculation of actual students divided by the number of occupied units. • "Single Family--2023 and beyond" lists the developments that are in process, but have not yet started to occupy units. This definition also applies to future Multi-family units. • The units for these developments are multiplied by the Student Generation Factor for each to determine the "Estimated Students Based on Student Generation Factors" Below are the Student Generation Factors for 2023. 2023 Single-Family Multi-Family Elementary 0.303 0.440 Middle 0.133 0.150 High 0.151 0.172 Total 0.587 0.762 SINGLE DEVELOPMENT MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENT Capital Facilities Plan Auburn School District Development Growth Including the Previous 5 Years March 2023(Based on Current Year Enrollment) SINGLE FAMILY Development Name Year of Full Units/ Current To Be Feeder Actual Students Student Generation Factors Occupancy Parcels Occupancy Occupied Elementary Elem Middle HS Total Elem Middle HS Total Anthem 2018 13 13 0 Ilalko 9 2 2 13 0.692 0.154 0.154 1.000 Bridges 2021 380 380 0 Aurthur Jacobsen 106 40 47 193 0.279 0.105 0.124 0.508 Canyon Creek 2018 151 151 0 Evergreen Hts. 32 16 15 63 0.212 0.106 0.099 0.417 Dulcinea 2018 6 6 0 Lea Hill 6 1 2 9 1.000 0.167 0.333 1.500 Forest Glen at Lakland 2021 30 30 0 Gildo Rey 8 4 1 13 0.267 0.133 0.033 0.433 Greenvale 17 12 5 Hazelwood 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 Greenview Estates(Knudson) 17 6 11 Arthur Jacobsen 1 1 0 2 0.167 0.167 0.000 0.333 Hastings 2020 10 10 0 Evergreen Hts. 4 1 2 7 0.400 0.100 0.200 0.700 Hazel View 2018 22 22 0 Lea Hill 9 4 4 17 0.409 0.182 0.182 0.773 Lakeland:Pinnacle Estates 2018 99 99 0 Bowman Creek P23 28 24 93 0.414 0.283 0.242 0.939 Lozier Ranch 18 7 11 Chinook 0 0 Ni 0.143 0.000 0.000 0.143 Mountain View 2018 55 55 0 Evergreen Hts. 4 8 26 0.255 0.073 0.145 0.473 Palisades(Omni Homes) 16 14 2 Alpac 2 5 10 0.214 0.143 0.357 0.714 River Rock 14 6 8 Aurthur Jacobsen 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Seremounte 2019 30 30 0 Aurthur Jacobsen 11 17 51 0.767 0.367 0.567 1.700 Vasiliy 2021 8 8 0 Terminal Park 0 0 2 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.250 Willow Place 2021 11 11 0 Lea Hill 2 01 3 5 0.182 0.000 0.273 0.455 Totals 18971 8601 37 2611 1141 1301 505 0.303 0.133 0.1511 0.587 SINGLE FAMILY--2023 and Beyond Development Name Units/ Current To Be Student Generation Factors Parcels Occupancy Occupied Elem Middle HS Total Aliens Acres 20-Lot Prelim Plat 20 0 20 6 3 3 12 Ashton Park 20-Lot Prelim Plat 20 0 20 6 3 3 12 Canyon Ridge Estates 26 0 26 8 3 4 15 Carbon Trails 44 0 44 13 6 7 26 River Glen 12-Lot Plat 12 0 12 4 2 2 7 Robbins Prelim Plat 31-Lot SFR Lots 31 0 31 9 4 51 18 Summit at Kendall Ridge Plat 17 0 17 5 2 3 10 The Alicias 56-Lot Plat 56 0 56 17 7 8 33 "To Be Occcupied"above 37 0 37 11 5 6 22 243 243 Totals 66 29 33 127 Capital Facilities Plan Auburn School District Development Growth Including the Previous 5 Years March 2023(Based on Current Year Enrollment) MULTI FAMILY Development Name Year of Full Units/ Current To Be Feeder Actual Students Student Generation Factors Occupancy Parcels Occupancy Occupied Elementary Elem Middle HS Total Elem Middle HS Total Promenade A is 2018 294 294 0 Lea Hill 205 100 104 409 0.697 0.340 0.354 1.391 The Villas at Auburn 2018 295 295 0 Washington 59 14 27 100 0.200 0.047 0.092 0.339 Copper Gate Apartments 2021 500 500 0 Evergreen Hts. 308 81 94 483 0.616 0.162 0.188 0.966 The Verge Auburn 2022 226 226 0 Terminal Park 7 2 1 10 0.031 0.009 0.004 0.044 Totals 1315 1315 0 1 579 197 226 1002 0.440 0.150 0.172 0.762 MULTI FAMILY--2023 and beyond Units/ Current To Be Estimated Students Based on Parcels Occupancy Occupied Student Generation Factors Lexi 1 190 0 190 84 28 33 145 "To be Occupied"above 01 0 0 01 01 o 0 190 190 841 281 33 145 Capital Facilities Plan SECTION III - STANDARD OF SERVICE The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn, City of Black Diamond and the City of Kent indicate that each school district must establish a "Standard of Service" in order to ascertain the overall capacity to house its projected student population. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage "capacity" guidelines for computing state funding support. The fundamental purpose of the OSPI guidelines is to provide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching funds for school construction projects. By default these guidelines have been used to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population. The OSPI guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, facility configurations, emerging educational reform, or the dynamics of each student's educational program. The Auburn School District Standard of Service addresses those local considerations that require space in excess of the OSPI guidelines. The effect on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation pattern. Conditions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without accompanying computations. OVEPVIEW As reflected in enrollment numbers for the 2022-23 school year, the Auburn School District operates 16 elementary schools housing 8,280 students in grades K through S including Early Childhood Education program. The four middle schools house 3,731 students in grades 6 through 8. The District operates three comprehensive senior high schools and one alternate high ' school, housing S,28S students in grades 9 through 12. (Source: October 1, 2022 Enrollment) w' `p Capital Facilities Plan CLASS SIZE The number of students per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the student population. Specialists create additional space needs. Class sizes are subject to collective bargaining agreements. Changes to class size agreements can have significant impact on available space. The current student/teacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 20.33 students per teacher. Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 20.33 students per room at grades K - S. At grades 6 - 8 the limit is set at 28.02 students per room. At grades 9 - 12 the limit is set at 28.74 students per room. The OSPI space allocation for each grade articulation level, less the computed reduction for the Auburn School District Standard of Service, determines the District's capacity to house projected student populations. These reductions are shown in the following documents by grade articulation level. ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STANDARD OF SERVICE MIDDLE SCHOOL STANDARD OF SERVICE HIGH SCHOOL STANDARD OF SERVICE �k STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS Elm �rx y ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate to severe disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses 19 classrooms to provide for 151 students. The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. No loss of capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to total elementary population. PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates an adaptive behavior program for students with behavior disabilities at the elementary school level.The program uses two classrooms to provide for 10 students. The housing requirements for this program exceed the OSPI space allocations. (Two classrooms @ 20.33-8=12.33) Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 12.33 each = (25) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 12.33 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (25) SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities. Twenty-one standard classrooms are required to house this program.Continued loss of capacity is expected as growth in program is larger than the total elementary population. Loss of Permanent Capacity 17(20-3)rooms @ 20.33 each = (346) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (346) STUDENT TEACHER ENRICHMENT PROGRAM(STEP) The Auburn School District operates an elementary program for highly capable and high achieving students at Grade 4 and Grade 5. This program is housed in two classrooms at Terminal Park Elementary School and two classrooms at Willow Crest Elementary School. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 20.33 each= (81) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @20.33 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss= (81) EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a pre-school program for young children below age five with disabilities. This program is housed at fifteen different elementary schools and currently uses 15 standard classrooms.The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @ 20.33 each = (305) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (305) READING LABS The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional language arts instruction. These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces if available in each elementary school. Five elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available,thus they are housed in a standard classroom.The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 20.33 each = (102) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (102) MUSIC ROOMS The Auburn School District elementary music programs require one acoustically-modified classroom at each school for music instruction. The housing requirements are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @ 20.33 each = (305) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (305) MULTI-LINGUAL LEARNER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates pullout programs at the elementary school level for multi-lingual learner students. This program requires 33 standard classrooms that are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 33 rooms @ 20.33 each = (671) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (671) SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for eight highly-impacted elementary schools. This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade level and do not receive other services. This program requires eight standard classrooms that are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 20.33 each = (163) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (163) ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a learning specialist program to increase literacy skills for first and second graders. This program model was originally created from the 1-728 funds and currently has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms,as well as pulling out students into designated classrooms. The district is utilizing classrooms at all fifteen elementary schools. Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @ 20.33 each = (305) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (305) EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (ECEAP) The Auburn School District operates an ECEAP program for 246 pre-school aged children in twelve sections '\ of half-day length and one full-day program. The program is housed at seven elementary schools and utilizes ten standard elementary classrooms and one additional classroom space and seven auxiliary office spaces. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI ,z. space guidelines. 'y Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 20.33 each = (203) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = 0 n Total Capacity Loss = (203) �r �s t" t MIDDLE SCHOOLS SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level. This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific disabilities. Eleven classrooms are required at the middle school level to provide for approximately 330 students. The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior disabilities. The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses two classrooms. One of the two classrooms for this program are provided for in the OSPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 rooms @ 28.02 each = (28) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (28) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates seven structured learning classrooms at the middle school level for students with moderate to severe disabilities. Two of the seven classrooms for this program are provided for in the OSPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 28.02 each = (140) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (140) MULTI-LINGUAL LEARNER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for multi-lingual learner students. This program requires 12 standard classrooms that are not provide for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 12 rooms @ 28.02 each = (336) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (336) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95%utilization of all available teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 28.02 each = (224) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (224) 6, HIGH SCHOOLS NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the high school level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 28.74 each = (29) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (29) MULTI-LINGUAL LEARNER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at three comprehensive high schools for multi- lingual learner students. This program requires 15 standard classrooms that are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @ 28.74 each= (431) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (431) PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior diabilities. The program is housed at one of the high schools and uses two classrooms. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 28.74 each= (57) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (57) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates twelve structured learning center classrooms for students with moderate to severe disabilities. This program is housed at three high schools requiring standard classrooms that are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 12 rooms @ 28.74 each= (345) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (345) SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities. The current high school program requires 15 classrooms to provide program to meet educational needs of the students. The OSPI space guidelines provide for one of the 15 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 28.74 each= (402) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (402) PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center.The OSPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity. This space was not intended for,nor is it usable for,classroom instruction. It was constructed to provide a community center for the performing arts. Using OSPI capacity guidelines,25,000 square feet computes to 208 unhoused students or 7.25 classrooms. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7.25 rooms @ 28.74 each= (208) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95%utilization of all available teaching stations.There are 185 teaching stations available in the senior high facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 10 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 28.74 each= (287) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (287) STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS ELEMENTARY Loss of Permanent Capacity (2,505) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (2,505) MIDDLE SCHOOL Loss of Permanent Capacity (729) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (729) SENIOR HIGH Loss of Permanent Capacity (1,760) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,760) TOTAL Loss of Permanent Capacity (4,994) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (4,994) Capital Facilities Plan SECTION IV - INVENTORY OF FACILITIES Table IV.] shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OSPI-rated capacities. Table IV.2 shows the number and location of each portable by school. The district uses portable facilities to: 1. provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting, 2. make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique students needs, and 3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. Portable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on existing physical plants. Core facilities (i.e. gymnasiums, restrooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc.) are not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding portable classrooms. TABLE IV.1 PERMANENT FACILITIES INVENTORY TABLE IV.2 PORTABLE FACILITIES INVENTORY DISTRICT SCHOOL FACILITIES MAP Capital Facilities Plan TABLE IVA PERMANENT FACILITY INVENTORY BUILDING CAPACITY ACRES ADDRESS Elementary Schools Alpac Elementary 503 10.68 310 Milwaukee bopulevard North, Pacific, WA 98047 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 618 10.02 29205 132nd Street SE, Auburn, WA 98092 Bowman Creek Elementary 812 22.03 5701 Kersey Way SE, Auburn, WA 98092 Chinook Elementary 806 12.37 3502 Auburn Way South, Auburn, WA 98092 Dick Scobee Elementary 804 8.90 1031 104th Street NE,Auburn,WA 98002 Evergreen Heights Elementary 451 10.10 5602 South 316th,Auburn,WA 98001 Gildo Rey Elementary 516 10.05 1005 37th Street SE,Auburn, WA 98002 Hazelwood Elementary 580 13.08 11815 Southeast 304th Street,Auburn, WA 98092 Ilalko Elementary 578 14.23 301 Oravetz Place Sourtheast,Auburn,WA 98092 Lake View Elementary 566 16.48 16401 Southeast 318th Street, Auburn, WA 98092 Lakeland Hills Elementary 580 12.00 1020 Evergreen Way SE, Auburn, WA, 98092 Lea Hill Elementary 798 20.24 30908 124th Avenue SE, Auburn, WA 98092 Pioneer Elementary 816 11.50 2301 M Street SE,Auburn, WA 98002 *Terminal Park Elementary 393 17.40 1825 K Street SE, Auburn, WA 98002 on K Street Washington Elementary 501 5.33 20 E Street Northeast,Auburn, WA 98002 Willow Crest Elementary 812 10.60 13002 SE 304th Street,Auburn,WA 98092 ELEMENTARY CAPACITY 10,134 "Terminal Park Elementary is being rebuilt students being housed at interim site for the 2022-23 school year. Reopens in September 2023. Middle Schools Cascade Middle School 823 16.94 1015 24th Street NE,Auburn, WA 98002 Mt. Baker Middle School 829 30 620 37th Street SE,Auburn,WA 98002 Olympic Middle School 989 17.45 839 21st Street SE, Auburn, WA 98002 Rainier Middle School 830 25.54 30620 116th Ave SE,Auburn, WA 98092 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3,471 a3 F High Schools Auburn High School 2,137 23.74 711 E Main Street,Auburn,WA 98002 K y . Auburn Riverside High School 1,384 35.32 501 Oravetz Road,Auburn,WA 98092 Auburn Mountainview High Schoc 1,437 39.42 28900 124th Ave SE,Auburn, WA 98092 F �k w West Auburn High School 233 5.26 401 E Main Street, Auburn, WA 98001 § HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5,191 w�y, �4a s TOTAL CAPACITY 18,796 Capital Facilities Plan INVENTORY OF FACILITIES TABLE IV. 2 PORTABLE FACILITES INVENTORY Elementary Schools 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Alpac 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Arthur Jacobsen 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bowman Creek 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Chinook 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dick Scobee 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evergreen Heights 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Gildo Rey 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 Hazelwood 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Ilalko 7 2 2 2 2 2 2 Lake View 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lakeland Hills 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Lea Hill 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pioneer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Terminal Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Washington 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Willow Crest 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 43 31 31 31 31 31 31 TOTAL CAPACITY 874 630 630 630 630 630 630 Middle Schools 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Cascade 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 Mt. Baker 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Olympic 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Rainier 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 TOTAL UNITS 35 39 39 39 39 39 39 TOTAL CAPACITY 981 1,093 1,093 1,093 1,093 1,093 1,093 High Schools 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Auburn High School 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 Auburn High School-*TAP 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Auburn Mountainview 8 12 12 12 12 12 12 Auburn Riverside 17 18 18 18 18 18 18 West Auburn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 30 39 39 39 39 39 39 TOTAL CAPACITY 862 1,121 1,121 1,121 1,121 1,121 1,121 'TAP-Transition Assistance Program for 18-21 year old students with special needs. COMBINED TOTAL UNITS 108 109 109 109 109 109 109 COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY 2,717 2,844 2,844 2,844 2,844 2,844 2,844 AL + AN 9 Auburn Mountainview US Arthur Jacobsen ES Hazelwood ES Willow Crest ES r' Cascade MS a Rainier MS Evergreen He' a hick Scobee ES Lea Hill ES r. 4 Lake View ES IwiR" Administration Building West Aub Auburn HS s ' ' Wasbingtor ES r � �'' ,.ark ES Pic MS Chinook ES �:/.fill to "�■ Gildo Rey ES 'Mt Baker NkS °Alpac ES Auburn Riverside HS llalka ES as =Bowman Creek ES t Lakeland Hills ES t 1� r� _ 3 f( o3noC¢[��NJC Capital Facilities Plan SECTION V - STUDENT CAPACITY While the Auburn School District uses the OSPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from which to determine space needs, the District's educational program requires more space than that provided for under the formula. This additional square footage is converted to numbers of students in Section III, Standard of Service. The District's capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional space to house its programs. Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new funded facilities. The combined effect of these adjustments is shown on Line B in Tables V.l and V.2. Table V.l shows the District's capacity with portable units included and Table V.2 without these u n its. Table V.l Capacity with Portables Table V.2 Capacity without Portables Capital Facilities Plan Table V.1 Student Capacity with Portables 2022.23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 A. OSPI Capacity 18,796 19,224 19,224 19,224 19,224 19,224 19,224 A.1 OSPI Capacity- New Elementary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A.2 OSPI Capacity- Replacements 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A.3 OSPI Capacity- New Middle School 0 0 0 0 800 0 0 B. Capacity Adjustments B1. Portables 2,717 2,844 2,844 2,844 2,844 2,844 2,844 B2. Exclude Standard of Service (4,994) (4,994) (4,994) (4,994) (4,994) (4,994) (4,994) C. Net Capacity 16,519 17,074 17,074 17,074 17,874 17,074 17,074 D. ASD Enrollment 17,059 17,344 17,454 17,577 17,702 17,822 18,000 E. ASD Surplus/Deficit -540 -270 -380 -503 172 -748 -926 r rid, Capital Facilities Plan Table V.2 Student Capacity without Portables 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 A. OSPI Capacity 18,796 19,224 19,224 19,224 19,224 19,224 19,224 A.1 OSPI Capacity- New Elementary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A.2 OSPI Capacity- Replacements 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A.3 OSPI Capacity- New Middle School 0 0 0 0 800 0 0 B. Capacity Adjustments B1. Exclude Standard of Service (4,994) (4,994) (4,994) (4,994) (4,994) (4,994) (4,994) C. Net Capacity 13,802 14,230 14,230 14,230 15,030 14,230 14,230 D. ASD Enrollment 17,059 17,344 17,454 17,577 17,702 17,822 18,000 E. ASD Surplus/Deficit -3,257 -3,114 -3,224 -3,347 -2,672 -3,592 -3,770 t"'1 Capital Facilities Plan SECTION VI - CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN The formal process used by the Auburn School Board to address current and future facility needs began almost SO years ago in 1974. The process includes a formation of a community-wide citizen's committee and throughout the years, these Ad Hoc Committees have conducted work and made recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and facilities. In October of 2008, after two years of review and study, a Steering Committee made recommendations to the Board regarding the capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities as recommended by the 2004-OS Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee. These recommendations, based on specific criteria, led to the Board placing a school improvement bond and capital improvements levy on the ballot in March 2009. Voters did not approve either measure that would have updated 24 facilities and replaced three aging schools. The Board decided to place only a six-year Capital Levy on the ballot in November of 2009, which passed at SS.17%. The levy funded $46.4 million of needed improvement projects at 24 sites over the following seven school years. Planning for the replacement of aging schools was started with educational specifications and schematic design process for the replacement of Auburn High School. The District acquired a site for a future high school in 2008 and a second site for a future middle school in 2009. The District also continued efforts to acquire property around Auburn High School. The Special Education Transitional Assistance Program (TAP) opened in February of 2010. This facility t is designed for students with disabilities that are 18 to 21 years old. 5 rv.4 In the November 2012 election, the community supported the $110 million �? bond issue for the Auburn High School Modernization and Reconstruction Project at 62%. Construction began in February 2013. The entire new building was occupied by Auburn High School students and staff in the fall of 201S, with site improvements being completed during the 201S-16 school year. In January 201S, a citizen's ad hoc committee was convened by direction of the Board to address growth and facilities. The major recommendations were r. to construct two new elementary schools in the next four years and to acquire y 3 new elementary school sites as soon as possible. Capital Facilities Plan In the November 2016 election, the community supported the $4S6 million bond issue for the replacement of six schools and the construction of two new elementary schools at 62.83%. Construction for the replacement of Olympic Middle School began in May 2018 and was completed in Fall 2019. Construction for Bowman Creek Elementary School began in May 2019 and was completed in Fall 2020. Construction for the replacement of Dick Scobee Elementary School began in June 2019 and was completed in Fall 2020. Construction for Willow Crest Elementary School and replacement of Pioneer Elementary School began in May 2020 and was completed in Fall 2021. Construction for replacement of Chinook and Lea HIII Elementary Schools began in June 2021 and was completed in Fall of 2022. Construction for replacement of Terminal Park Elementary School began in June 2022 and will be completed in Fall of 2023. The District anticipates running a Capital Bond Measure in 2024. Funds will be used to construct a new middle school on property currently owned by the District, and may include funds to replace one or more existing schools. The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years. The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population. 2023-29 Capital Construction Plan (May 2023) Project Funded Projected Fund 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 Cost Source Portable Yes $2,400,000 Impact ✓ Relocation' Fees Middle School#S' Yes $112,000,000 Bond ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ plan plan const const open Funds may be secured through a combination of a bond issue, impact fees, and/or state matching funds Capital Facilities Plan SECTION VII - IMPACT FEES IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION (SPRING 2023) TABLES VII.1-VI1.4 TABLES VII.S &VII.6 IMPACT FEE ELEMENTS Capital Facilities Plan IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION(Spring 2023) Table VITA SITE COST PER RESIDENCE Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/F ility Capacity))x Student Factor Site Cost per Facility Student Generation Factor Cost per Cost per Acreage Acre Capacity Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Famil Elementary(K-5) 15 $0 650 0.3030 0.4400 $0 $0 Middle(6-8) 25 $0 800 0.1330 0.1500 $0 $0 High 9-12 40 $0 1500 0.1510 0.1720 $0 $0 $0 $0 Table VII.2 PERMANENT FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCE Formula: ((Facility Cost/Student Capacity)x Student Factor))x Permanent-to-Total Square Footage Percenta e Facility Student %Perm Sq Ft/ Student Generation Factor Cost per Cost per Cost Capacity Total Sq Ft Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Family Elementary(K-5) $0 650 0.9529 0.3030 0.4400 $0 $0 Middle(6-8) $143,000,000 800 0.9529 0.1330 0.1500 $22,654 $25,550 High 9-12 $0 1500 0.9529 0.1510 0.1720 $0 1 $0 $22,654 1 $25,550 Table VII.3 PORTABLES CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCE Formula: ((Facility Cost/Student Capacity)x Student Factor))x Portable-to-Total Square Footage Ratio P Facility Student %Port Sq FU Student Generation Factor Cost per Cost per Cost Capacity Total Sq Ft Single Famil Multi FamilySingle FamilyMulti Family Elementary(K-5) $250,000 20.33 0.0471 0.3030 0.4400 $175 $255 Middle(6-8) $250,000 28.02 0.0471 0.1330 0.1500 $56 $63 High 9-12 $250,000 28.74 0.0471 0.1510 0.1720 $62 $70 $293 $388 Table VITA STATE MATCH CREDIT PER RESIDENCE Formula: (Boeckh Index x SPI Foot a e x District Match x Student Factor Boeckh OSPI State Student Generation Factor Cost per Cost per Index Footage Match Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Family Elementary(K-5) 90 64.58% 0.3030 0.4400 $0 $0 Middle(6-8) $246.83 108 64.58% 0.1330 0.1500 $2,290 $2,582 High 9-12 130 64.58% 0.1510 0.1720 $0 $0 $2,290 $2,582 V. TAX CREDIT PER RESIDENCE Formula: Expressed as the present value of an annuity Tax Credit=Present Value(interest rate,discount period,average assessed value x tax rate) Average Current Debt Bond Buyer Residential Service Tax Index Annual Number of Tax Credit Assessed Rate Interest Rate Years Value Single Family $573,704 $1.84 3.58% 10 $8,744 Multi Family $270,892 $1.84 3.58% 10 $4,129 VI. DEVELOPER PROVIDED FACILITY CREDIT Formula: (Value of Site or Facility/Number of dwelling units) Value No.of Units Facility Credit Single Family $0.00 1 $0.00 Multi Family $0.00 1 $0.00 Capital Facilities Plan Site Cost Projections Recent Property Acquisitions Acreage Purchase Year Purchase Price Purchase Adjusted Projected Annual Inflation Factor Cost per Acre Present Day Elementary#16 Parcel 1 1.26 2019 $480,000 $380,952 $508,200 2019 2020 1 2021 2022 1 $2,023 Elementary#16 Parcel 8.19 2019 $2,959,561 $361,363 $482,066 10% 5% 10% 10% 5% Elementary#16 Parcel 3 0.80 2018 $460,000 $575,000 $843,771 Totals 10.25 Average Cost per Acre $513,509 IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION(Spring 2023) FEE RECAP SUMMARY Single Multiple Family Family Site Costs $0.00 $0.00 Permanent Facility Construction Costs $22,654.41 $25,550.09 Portable Facility Costs $293.14 $388.21 State Match Credit ($2,289.66) ($2,582.34) Tax Credit $8,743.84 $4,128.67 FEE(No Discount) $11,914.04 $19,227.29 FEE(50%Discount) $5,957.02 $9,613.64 Less ASD Discount $0.00 $0.00 Facilit Cretld $0.00 $0.00 Net Fee Obligation $5,957.02 $9,913.64 Capital Facilities Plan SINGLE FAMILY MULTI FAMILY IMPACT FEE ELEMENTS Elementary Middle High Elementary Middle High K-5 6-8 9-12 K-5 6-8 9-12 Student Generation Factor 0.303 0.133 0.151 0.440 0.150 0.172 New Facility Capacity 650 800 1500 650 800 1500 New Facility Cost-Middle School Cost Estimate May 2023 $143,000,000 $143,000,000 Classroom Capacity-Grades K-5 @ 20.33,6-8 @ 28.02,&9-12 @ 28.74 20.33 28.02 28.74 20.33 28.02 28.74 Portable Costs-including site work,set up,and furnishing $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 Site Acreage-ASD Standard or SPI Minimum 15 25 40 15 25 40 Site Cost per Acre-table above $2,023 $2,023 $2,023 $2,023 $2,023 $2,023 Permanent Square Footage- 16 Elementary,4 Middle,and 4 High Schools 958,340 378,631 677,976 958,340 378,631 677,976 Portable Facility Square Footage-24 x 864 SF+83 x 896 SF+TAP 2661 38,292 30,912 28,561 38,292 30,912 28,561 Total Square Footage-Permanent+Portable 996,632 409,543 706,537 996,632 409,543 706,537 Percent of Total-Permanent Facilities 96.16% 92.45% 95.96% 96.16% 92.45% 96.16% Percent of Total-PortableFacilities 3.84% 7.55% 4.04% 3.84% 7.55% 4.04% OSPI Square Footage Per Student-WAC 392-343-035 90 108 130 90 108 130 Boeckh Index-July 2022(2023 Amount Pending Legislature Budget Adoption) $246.83 $246.83 $246.83 $246.83 $246.83 $246.83 1 OSPI State Match Percent-2022 64.58% 64.58% 64.58% 64.58% 64.58% 64.58% District Match Percent-May 2023(computed) 35.42% 35.42% 35.42% 35.42% 35.42% 35.42% District Average Assessed Value-King County May 2023 $573,704 $573,704 $573,704 $222,095 $222,095 $222,095 Debt Service Tax Rate-Current Fiscal Year 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 General Obligation Bonds Interest Rate-Bond Buyer 20 Index Current Fiscal Year 3.58% 3.58% 1 3.58% 3.58% 1 3.58% 1 3.58% Exhibit C - Federal Way Public Schools CFP FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Each Scholar: A voice.A dream.A BRIGHT future. 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Lake Grove Mirror Lake Wildwood Elementary Elementary Elementary 2 Ilefferson as Star Lake Olympic Elementary & View K-8 School Evergreen Middle School en�9,I a ri L Memorial Field Illahee Middle Renovation School Federal Way District No. 210 Federal Way, Washington Adopted: June 27, 2023 Resolution No: 2023-17 The Federal Way School District No. 210 hereby provides this Capital Facilities Plan documenting present and future school facility requirements of the District. The plan contains all elements required by the Growth Management Act and King County Council Ordinance 21-A. Page 1 of 35 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN May 12, 2023 BOARD OF EDUCATION Trudy Davis, President Dr. Jennifer Jones, Vice President Luckisha Phillips, Legislative Representative Quentin Morris, WIAA Representative Hiroshi Eto SUPERINTENDENT Dr. Dani Pfeiffer Prepared by: Ty Bergstrom, Chief Finance & Operations Officer, Interim Sally McLean, Facilitator Michael Swartz, Executive Director of Capital Projects Jennifer Thomas, Student& Demographic Forecaster 2 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 2-3 SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction 4 Inventory of Educational Facilities 5 Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities 6 Needs Forecast- Existing Facilities 7 Needs Forecast-New Facilities 8 Six Year Finance Plan 9-10 SECTION 2 MAPS Introduction 11 Map—City and County Jurisdictions 12 SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction 13 Building Capacities 14-16 Portable Locations 17-18 Student Forecast 19-22 SECTION 4 KING COUNTY, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, AND CITY OF KENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Introduction 23 Capacity Summaries 24-28 Impact Fee Calculations 29-31 Student Generation Rates 32 Impact Fee Changes from 2023 to 2024 33 1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB) 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, City of Kent Ordinance No.4278 effective June 2018, revised December 2021, and the City of Auburn Ordinance No. 5078 effective 1998, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2023. This plan will be submitted for consideration to each of the jurisdictions located with the Federal Way Public Schools' service area: King County,the City of Kent,City of Federal Way and the City of Auburn and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is requested to be included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The City of Des Moines collects school impact fees as part of the SEPA process. Discussions with the City of Milton to adopt an ordinance for school impact fees for parcels located within the Federal Way School District's service area is in process. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council for Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing,jobs, services,culture,and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies or management need. Currently Federal Way Public Schools is nearing the end of Phase 2 Bond projects supporting school expansion and replacement as authorized by the voters in 2017. Prior to the passage of the Phase 2 Bond the District formed a 100 member Facilities Planning Committee consisting of parents, community members and staff. This Committee was tasked with developing a recommendation to the Superintendent regarding Phase 2 of the District's plan for school construction, remodeling, and/or modernization for voter consideration in November 2017. The voters passed this $450M bond authorization with a 62% YES vote reflecting a commitment to invest in the modernization of our infrastructure. As of today, the District has completed Thomas Jefferson High School, Evergreen Middle School, Lake Grove Elementary, Mirror Lake Elementary, Star Lake Elementary, and Wildwood Elementary. Additionally, Olympic View K-8 is scheduled to open in Fall of 2023. Illahee Middle school is at the end of the Design Phase and set for Construction beginning June 2023. Finally, Memorial Field is under construction with completion target of Fall 2023. 2 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION, continued The rebuilding of the schools has and will continue create additional capacity for students at the elementary and high school levels. The District continues to monitor factors that may have an impact on enrollment and capacity at our schools, including new single-family and multi-family residential developments and any impacts due to the COVID-19. In accordance with the McCleary decision, the State has provided funding to reduce K-3 class size to 17 and 4-12 class size to 25. Beginning in 2019-20 the legislature expected compliance with this funding adding pressure to the need for elementary capacity. In response to this need the district has acquired a commercial building to renovate into classrooms to provide permanent additional capacity. The COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected brick and mortar enrollment in recent years, as well as increased enrollment in the Internet Academy. However, the district's 2022-23 enrollment was higher than projected and has continued to grow throughout the current school year. As we move farther away from the effects of COVID-19, we expect to see continued enrollment growth, especially considering the City of Federal Way's plans to increase housing in the downtown core in conjunction with Sound Transit's Link Light Rail development. The District has increased capacity at the elementary level over the past several years and shows no unhoused scholars based on the six-year enrollment projections (even with projected growth at that level). The 2024 Capital Facilities Plan does reflect growth at the high school level over the six-year planning period and, with the recent addition at Thomas Jefferson High School and the addition of portable facilities, the District is able to house new scholars at the high school level. As a result, school impact fees are appropriate to assist in offsetting costs of adding increased instructional spaces. 3 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 1 - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. A Financial Plan that shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization listed follows this. 4 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS(K-5) Adelaide 1635 SW 300 St Federal Way 98023 Brigadoon 3601 SW 3361''St Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 298"St Auburn 98001 Enterprise 35101 5''Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Green Gables 32607 47''Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308t''St Auburn 98001 Lake Grove 303 SW 3081''St Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35827 32°d Ave S Auburn 98001 Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Rd Federal Way 98003 Meredith Hill 5830 S 300t''St Auburn 98001 Mirror Lake 625 S 314d'St Federal Way 98003 Nautilus(K-8) 1000 S 2891'St Federal Way 98003 Olympic View(K-8) 2626 SW 327t''St Federal Way 98023 Panther Lake 34424 1"Ave S Federal Way 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368th St Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 34600 12'''Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Silver Lake 1310 SW 325d' Pl Federal Way 98023 Star Lake 26812 401 Ave S, Bldg.B Kent 98032 Sunnycrest 24629 42°d Ave S Kent 98032 Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320t''St Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42°d Ave S Auburn 98001 Wildwood 2405 S 300t''St Federal Way 98003 Woodmont(K-8) 26454 16''Ave S Des Moines 98198 MIDDLE SCHOOLS(6-8) Federal Way Public Academy(6-10) 34620 9'''Ave S Federal Way 98003 Illahee 36001 Pt Ave S Federal Way 98003 Kilo 4400 S 308t''St Auburn 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 314"'St Federal Way 98023 Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Rd Federal Way 98003 Sequoyah 3450 S 360''' ST Auburn 98001 Evergreen 26812 401 Ave S, B1dg.A Kent 98032 TAF @ Saghalie(6-12) 33914 19''Ave SW Federal Way 98023 HIGH SCHOOLS(9-12) Decatur 2800 SW 32011'St Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 30611 161 Ave S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288t''St Auburn 98001 Todd Beamer 35999 161 Ave S Federal Way 98003 Career Academy at Truman 31455 28t'Ave S Federal Way 98003 ADDITIONAL SCHOOLS Internet Academy(K-12) 31455 28''Ave S Federal Way 98003 Employment Transition Program(12+) 33250 21"Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Federal Way Open Doors 31455 28''Ave S Federal Way 98003 ES24(Former DeVry Property)(K-8) 3600 S 344th Way, Federal Way 98001 5 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CURRENT INVENTORY NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Developed Property Central Kitchen 1214 S 332nd St Federal Way 98003 Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 3081h St Federal Way 98003 Educational Services Center 33330 81h Ave S Federal Way 98003 Support Services Center 1211 S 332nd St Federal Way 98003 Leased Property Early Learning Center at Uptown 1066 S 320th St Federal Way 98003 Square Undeveloped Property Site Location # 75 SW 360th Street& 3rd Avenue SW—9.2 Acres 65 S 35 l st Street& 52nd Avenue S—8.8 Acres 60 E of 1 Oth Avenue SW - SW 334th & SW 335th Streets - 10.04 Acres 73 N of SW 320th and east of 45th PL SW—23.45 Acres 71 S 344th Street& 46th Avenue S - 17.47 Acres 82 15t Way S and S 342 d St—Minimal acreage 96 S 308th St and 14th Ave S— .36 Acres Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. 6 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST -EXISTING FACILITIES PHASE EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS As Purchase and Relocate Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is needed Portables Impact Fees. II Thomas Jefferson High Replaced Existing Building, Voter Approved Capital bond School Increased Capacity II Illahee Middle School Replace Existing Building Voter Approved Capital bond II Evergreen Middle School Replaced Existing Building Voter Approved Capital bond II Lake Grove Elementary Replaced Existing Building, Voter Approved Capital bond Increased Capacity II Mirror Lake Elementary Replaced Existing Building, Voter Approved Capital bond Increased Capacity lI Olympic View K-8 School Replaced Existing Building, Voter Approved Capital bond Increased Capacity II Star Lake Elementary Replaced Existing Building, Voter Approved Capital bond Increased Capacity II Wildwood Elementary Replace Existing Building, Voter Approved Capital bond Increase Capacity II Memorial Stadium Replace Existing Facility Voter Approved Capital bond II ES24(DeVry Property) Temp Swing School SCAP and K-3 Class size Increase Capacity reduction funding III Mark Twain Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD, pending SCAP funding Increase Capacity 1[I Decatur High School Replace Existing Building, TBD Increase Ca acit III Kilo Middle School Replace Existing Building TBD II[ Sacajawea Middle School Replace Existing Building TBD III Adelaide Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD Increase Capacity III Brigadoon Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD Increase Ca acit III Camelot Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD Increase Capacity [II Lake Dolloff Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD Increase Capacity III Nautilus K-8 School Replace Existing Building, TBD Increase Ca acit III Twin Lakes Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD Increase Capacity III Woodmont K-8 School Replace Existing Building, TBD Increase Capacity 7 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST -ADDITIONAL FACILITIES NEW FACILITY I LOCATION I ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS FWPS has leased a portion of the Truman Campus property to Region X and Puget Sound Education Service District. Region X and PSESD built a Head Start building on this property which has served Federal Way 3- and 4-year-olds for the last twenty years. In the recent re- competition, the federal funding for a Head Start program at this location was lost. Subsequently the District has been using this facility for a state-funded Early Childhood Education (ECEAP) program and is currently in negotiations to secure title to the building. The building will only be available for preschool activities. FWPS is also concluding negotiations with King County Metro to secure the Redondo Park & Ride site for the relocation of Mark Twain Elementary school, which has been impacted by the construction of Sound Transit's Federal Way Link Extension. Construction of a replacement school is slated to be part of the next school construction bond, or Phase 3. 8 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Six Year Finance Plan Secured Fundin.- Sources hnpact Fees(1) $142,000 Land Sale Funds(2) ($3,820,000) Bond or Levy Funds(3) $80,798,000 K3-Class Size Reduction 4 $11,692,000 School Construction Assistance Program(SCAP)(5) $73,877,000 TOTAL $162,689,000 Projected Revenue Sources School Construction Assistance Program(SCAP)(6) $22,300,000 K-3 Class Size Reduction(7) S486,000 Bond Funds 8 $0 Land Fund Sales(9) $0 Impact Fees(10) $3,500.000 TOTAL $26,286,000 Actual and Planned Expenditures IlTotal Secured Funding and Projected Revenue I S 188,975,000 NEW SCHOOLS Estimatedand Budget 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total Total Cost Prior Years 2023-24 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 2028-2029 2029-2030 2023-2030 MODERNIZATION AND EKPANSION Lake Clove Elementary(11) $39,500,000 $0 $39,500,000 Mirror Lake Elementary(11) $41,800,000 $0 $41,800,000 Star Lake Elementary(11) $38,838,000 SO $38,838,000 Wildwood Elementary(11) $40,900,000 1 $0 $40,900,000 Olympic View K-8 School(l I) $47,450,000 $01 $47,450,000 Thomas Jefferson High School(11) $124,787,000 $0 $124,787,000 Evergreen Middle School(11) $66,129,000 $0 $66,129,000 lllahee Middle School(11) $27,848,000 $50,843,000 $9,309,000 S60,152,000 $88,000,000 Memorial Stadium(11) $28,821,000 $2,979,000 $2,979,000 $31,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 S ITE ACQUIS ITION Former DeVry/ES24(12) S27,470,000 $1,421,000 $1,423,000 $1,422,000 $1,424,000 $1,422,000 $1,423,000 S8,535,000 $36,005,000 TEMPORARY FACILITIES Portables(13) S3,500,000 $500,000 $500.000 $500,000 $500.000 $500,0001 S500A00 $500,0001 $3,500,000 S7,000,000 TOTAL $487,043,000 S55,743,000 1 $11,232,000 $1,922,0001 $1,924,0001 $1,922.000 $1,923,0001 S500,0001 $75,166,000 $562,209,000 9 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SIX YEAR FINANCE PLAN,CON'T NOTES. 1. These fees are currently being held in a King County, City of Federal Way, City of A uburn,and City of Kent impact fee account,and will be available for use by the District for system improvements. This is yearend balance on 12131122. 2. This is yearend balance on 12131122. 3. This is the 12131122 balance of bond funds and capital levy funds. This figure includes interest earnings. 4. This represents the K3-CSR revenue received but not spent as of 1213112022. 5. This represents the balance of SCAP funding but no spent as of 1213112022. 6. This is anticipated SCAP for the future projects authorized by the voters in 2017. 7. This is the remaining K-3 Class size reduction grant revenue. 8. In November 2017,the District passed a$450M bond measure. The amount included in the finance plan is forprojects that will create additional capacity. Only the costs associated with increasing capacity are included in school impact fee calculations. 9. There are no projected sale of surplus properties. 10.In this current plan,there are no projected impact fees. 11.Project budgets are updated as of December 2022. The budget for Illahee Middle School is still being updated 12. A former private university campus located in Federal Way was purchased in 2019 to provide up to 43 additional permanent elementary classrooms. Prior to creating new permanent capacity this location will be used as a temporary housing. These costs are excluded from impact fee calculations. 13. These fees represent the cost of purchasing and installing new portables. The portable expenditure in future years may replace existing portables that are not functional. These may not increase capacity and are not included in the capacity summary. 10 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 2 - MAPS As of September 2023, Federal Way Public Schools has twenty elementary schools (grades K- 5), three schools with a K-8 grade configuration, six middle school schools (grades 6-8), four high schools (grades 9-12) and four small secondary schools. The Federal Way Public Academy serves students in grades 6-10. The programs at Open Doors and Career Academy at Truman High School serves students in grades 9-12. In addition to these programs, TAF@Saghalie serves students in grades 6-12 who reside within the service area and the Employment and Transition Program (ETP) at the Norman Center serves 18-21-year-old scholars. The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School districts are different. If the district does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single development. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the district and is not taken lightly. It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. The final map included represents the city and county boundaries which overlap with the district's service areas. • City of Algona • City of Auburn • City of Des Moines • City of Federal Way • City of Kent • City of Milton • Unincorporated King County 11 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN MAP—CITY AND COUNTY JURISDICTIONS FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Each Scholar:A voice_A dream.h BRIGHT futilre.. k Des I Moinesr� �4� - !tent �f Auburn �_. i ►► Now r j + _ " Federal Wad r i r ► r +� ► r r. we + Algona King C rung r - Milton �=- City and County 7 Q.5 1 2Mles Jurisdictions FWPS boundaries is 100%Urban Growth Area 1L FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities - The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast—2023 through 2029 13 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING CAPACITIES This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. In general, the District's current target class size provides that the average class size for a standard classroom for grades K through 3 should be 17 students to comply with current legislation. In grades 4-5 the target is 25 students. For grades 6 to 12 the target class size is 26 students. Classrooms for students with Individualized Education Program (Special Education) needs are calculated at 12 seats per classroom. Historically, the District has used the OSPI square footage calculation as a baseline for capacity calculation and made adjustments for specific program needs. The District will continue to use this calculation for determining capacity at our middle and high schools. However, for elementary school capacity will be calculated based on the number of classroom spaces and the number of students assigned to each classroom. Class Size FWPS Historical HB2661/SHB2776 Square Footage Guidelines "Standard of Service" Enacted Law Guideline Kindergarten 18.9 17 25-28 Grades 1-2 18.9 17 25-28 Grade 3 18.9 17 28 Grades 4-5 25 25 28 Grades 6-12 26 26 28 For the purposes of determining student capacity at individual schools,the following list clarifies adjustments to classroom spaces and the OSPI calculation. Special Education Resource Rooms: Each middle school requires the use of a standard classroom(s) for special education students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. English as a Second Language Programs: Each middle school and high school require the use of a standard classroom for students learning English as a second language. Middle School Computer Labs: Each middle school has computer labs, except Evergreen Middle School. Wireless access has been installed at all secondary schools. If additional classroom space is needed, these computer labs may be converted to mobile carts. 14 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING CAPACITIES, continued High School Career Development and Learning Center (Resource) Room: Each high school provides special education resource room and career development classrooms for students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. Preschool/ECEAP: Our district currently offers preschool programs for both special needs & typically developing students at 9 elementary schools. We also have the ECEAP program at 10 sites (6 elementary schools, 3 high schools, and I commercial sites). These programs decrease capacity at those schools. Alternative Learning Experience: Federal Way offers students the opportunity to participate in an Alternative Learning Experience through our Internet Academy. These students have never been included in the capacity calculation of unhoused students. 1418 Youth Reengagement: Federal Way offers students the opportunity to participate in 1418 Youth Reengagement Open Doors program. These students are housed at the Truman campus but are not currently included in the capacity calculation of unhoused students. 15 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING CAPACITIES, continued ELEMENT-AIRY RUILDD�G HUDDLE SCHOOL BUILDL\G PROGRAM CAPACITY PROGR-A-NI CAPACITY School--Name Headcount 'Preschool School Name Headcount Adelaide 392 30 111ahee 355 Mgadoon 408 30 Kilo .7?9 Camelot 377E 30 Lakota 786 Enterprise 524 15 1 Saca'awea 694 Green Gables 439 Sequovah 5S5 Lake Dolloff 535 Evergreen 795 'Lake Grave 583 TAF A Saghalie 598 Lakeland 455 Federal'Wav Public Academe 1S3 'stark Twain 515 TOTAL: 5,275 Meredith Hill 606 30 '-Nlirror Lake 514 30 "Middle School Average Nautilus(K-S) -512 Olympic View(K-8) 429 HIGH SCHOOL BLI DLL>G Panther Lake 501 PROGR-A'4I CAPACITY Rainier View 607 30 Sherwood Forest 451 6 School Name Headcount Silver Lake: 476 Decatur 1243 Star Lake 544 30 Federal Wa}• 16S4 Sumvcrest 636 Thomas Jefferson 1600 Twin Lakes 413 30 Todd Beamer 10S5 Valhalla 59S TAF a Saghalie 155 ' '�7d+4 ood 597 30 Career Academy-at Truman 159 'oodmont(K-8) 474 Federal +'Vag-Public Academ 116 TOTAL. 11,592 291 Employment Transition Program 48 TOTAL 6.090 Elementary Average 504 High School Average 1,403 Notes: IPreschool enrollment reduces capacity-for K-5 students_ 15 preschool students in one classroom_ 'Federal''av Public Academy_Career Academy-at Truman High School,and Employment Transition Program and T-AF ri Saghhalie for the high school school grade span(9-12)are non-boundary schools.. These schools are not used in the calculated averages- Lake Grove and Wildwood opened January 20221;-Mirror Lake is opened September 021 16 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not an efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as interim measures to house students when increasing population impacts a school attendance area. Portables may also be required to house students when new or changing programs require additional capacity. They also provide housing for students until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. When permanent facilities become available,the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or childcare programs or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases,the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. With the school expansion projects funded through the 2017 Bond, new capacity has been created within the new schools and portables have been eliminated from these campuses. The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. 17 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS, continued PORTABLES LOCATED PORTABLESLOCATED AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS AT HIGH SCHOOLS NON NON INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL` INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL Adelaide 1 2 Decatur 8 1 Brigadoon 1 Federal Way Camelot Thomas 1 Jefferson Enterprise 3 Todd Beamer 8 Green Gables 1 TOTAL 16 1 Lake Dolloff 5 1 Lake Grove Lakeland Mark Twain 3 Meredith Hill 3 PORTABLESLOCATED Mirror Lake AT SUPPORT FACILITIES Nautilus 3 Olympic View MOT Panther Lake 4 TDC 9 Rainier View 5 Former TAFA Sherwood Forest 2 4 TOTAL 9 Silver Lake 1 3 Star Lake DISTRICT PORTABLES IN USE FOR Sunnycrest 6 ECEAP Twin Lakes 1 2 AND/OR HEADSTART Valhalla 4 Sherwood Forest 1 W ildwood Evergreen Woodmont 3 Total TOTAL 47 12 PORTABLESLOCATED AT MIDDLE SCHOOLS NON INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL Illahee Kilo l 6 Lakota Saca awea 5 Se uo ah 1 1 Evergreen TAFA Saghalie 4 TOTAL 11 7 18 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN STUDENT FORECAST Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development and facility need. Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made based on projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students. The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on birth rates within the district's census tracts and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. In January 2022, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District. The model used to forecast next year's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county-wide average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections. The long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes in the 5-19 age group for King County. 19 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN STUDENT FORECAST,CON'T The last demographer update was completed prior to the City of Federal Way's Housing Action Plan. The enrollment projections below have been updated to include anticipated new student growth generated from the planned development. .................................................................................................................................. .......................:................................................................................................................................................... : fami € Homes ES a .MS H .ES SGR . MS S�GR€ HS SGR 'fatal S€R .............EI'1....................................................................,........................................ ...........................................,.................................................r :The Woodland at Redondo Creek 2023: 67 11 5 € 6 € 0.1642 0.074b 0.0996 € 0-3284 ...............................................................................................................................,...............................................,..........._....... ................. a ................ a :West Hill Plat2023 20 3..........a_......._1 2 € 0.15U0 0.a540 € 0.104a 03a00 .......................................................................................................,........... .......... e : <..tr :South Campus Estates 2024 10 2 1 1 i 0-2000 0.1000 0.1000 0A000 ................................. ........ .............4............................................. a ... :Twin Tails 2024 € 38 6 € 3 4 0.1579 0.0789 € 0.1053 0.3421 .......................................................................................................a................................................,.................... ................. ................. a .................. �.. :1st Ave Townhomes 2025 € 135 23 9 13 0_1704 ? 0.0667 0.0463 0 3333 ................................................................................................................................,.................... ................. ................. .................,... :Gian Singh Townhomes 2a25 . 18 3 1 2 0.1667 's 0.0556 € 0.1.111 € 0.3333 s......................................................................................................,............................................ ................. ................ .................. ............... .................. �.. .Summit at Steel Lake 2425 24 4 2 2 € 0.1667 4.0833 € 0.0833 a 33s3 ............................................................................................................................. ................... ................. ................ ................. , ..... ,,... Upland Federal Way 2025 8 1 1 .1 011.50 0.1250 0.1250 0.3750 ................... ........................ ... ................. o ....... iVSM Plat 2025 11 2 1 1 0.1818 0.0909 0.0909 € 0.3636 .................................................................................................................................�................... ................. ................. ................. ............. :Alder Village 2026 € 84 14 6 € 8 € 0.1667 0.0714 0.0952 0 3333 .....................................................................................................e................................................e........................:........................a..............................................a Creekside Commons Townhomes 2026. 94 16 6 9 0.1702 € 0.0638 € 0.0957 0.3298 :-.....................,............................................. a Kislyak Short Plat 2026 6 1 0 1 i 0.1667 : 0.0000 0.1667 0.3333 i ............... ...............................................................,................................................,.....................• a s .Tota 1 515 86 50 0.1705 A 0.0692 ; a_a45b8 0.3340 36 'Single-family Student Generation Rates current as of 511J23 used to project the number of students per proposed development. :.............................................................................................................................................................................. ................. ........................................;......................... MS HS ES SGR MS SGR HS SGR iGtal SC�t€ yd�lulb-fad-EE fffatdabie Hor wg....................a..._Unfits:...g........_ES.........d......................_;.....................,. 'Silver Shadows 2024 202 s 144 74 74 € 0.7129 0.3663 ' 0-3663 1.4455 .......................................................................................................... .........,............................................. ................. ......... p . Beckett Apts 2025 € .%0 256 a 132 € 132 0.7111 a_3667 0.3667 1A444 ............................................................. ............. ................. a.................................... ¢. :Celebration Park Apts 2026 -345 € 245 126 : 126 € 0.7101 0.3652 ? 0.3652 1A406 ..................................................... .... ..........e................................................,............................................. a .................. ;........................4 .. :Total € -907 : 645 332 : 332 0.7104 0.3665 1 0_.3665 1A432 ......................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 'Multi-family(Affordable Houseing)Student Generation Rates current as of 5/1f 23 used to project the number of students per proposed development. ......................................................................................................... ............................. .. . VAM . .. MS HS ES SGR MS SGR' HS SGR €Total SGR: fl1-IMlaticet Rate Units its....¢......._ES.................................,........................:........................,................................................,........................; €Federal Way Mixed Use 2023 .240 : 29 15 : 23 0.1222 : 0.0621 € 0.0942 : 0.2792 ,. ,...............................................,..................... ; ..... .. ti...... Total......_240 : 29 : 15 i 23 : 0.1356 0.1073 0;1808 : 0.2792 € ................................................................. ...... ........... . .... ... 1Multi-family(Market-rate)Student Generation Rates from last market-rate development(Brookside,2009)used to project the number of students per proposed development 20 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN STUDENT FORECAST, CON'T October 1 Head Count Enrollment History and Projections Percent CalendarYr School Year Elementary Middle School High School Total K-12 Change 2018 2017-18 10.418 5,159 6,501 22.078 2019 2018-19 10,158 5.115 6,674 21,947 -0.6% 2020 2019-20 9.953 5.309 6,516 21.778 -0.8% 2021 2020-21 9,192 4,990 6,385 20,567 -5.6% 2022 2021-22 9,062 4.850 6.393 20,305 -1.3% 2023 2022-23 9317 4,719 6,532 20,568 1.3% 2024 B2023-24 9,452 4,789 6,473 20,714 0.7% 2025 P2024-25 9,613 4,872 6,558 21,044 1.6% 2026 P2025-26 9,695 4,913 6,569 21,176 0.6% 2027 P2026-27 9,743 4,935 6,559 21,238 0.3% 2028 P2027-28 9,782 4,955 6,586 21,322 0.4% 2029 P2028-29 9,860 4,995 6,638 21,493 0.8% 2029 P2029-30 99949 5,040 6,698 21,687 0.9% ElementarvK-5 Middle School 6-8 High School9-12 Includes Open Doors and Internet Academy Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast 23,000 22,500 22,000 21,500 21,000 20,500 20,000 19,500 19,000 School Year Series2 21 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN STUDENT FORECAST, continued Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of something else (e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend for the school-age population over time. The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2029. This model produces a projection that is between 19,500 and 21,000 when applied to the low, medium, and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models. Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington. Near term projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by current local economic conditions. The District tracks new development from five permitting jurisdictions. Long range planning assumes a student yield from proposed new housing consistent with historical growth patterns. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school district community in the future. The COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected brick and mortar enrollment in recent years, as well as increased enrollment in the Internet Academy. The district's 2022-23 enrollment was higher than projected. As we move farther away from the effects of COVID-19, we hope to see continued enrollment growth, especially considering the City of Federal Way's plans to increase housing in the down-town core in conjunction with Sound Transit's Link Light Rail development. We took a conservative look at residential developments in-progress and pre- application phase that were not taken into consideration with previous demographic studies because they were unknown at the time of the study. 22 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 4—KING COUNTY, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, AND CITY OF KENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Capacity Summaries Site & Construction Costs Allocations Student Generation Rates Impact Fee Calculations Reference to Impact Fee Calculations 23 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARIES All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information, Portable Capacity information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The District has recently adjusted its capacity calculation method for Elementary schools to better show capacity needed to comply with the K-3 Class Size Reduction. This adjustment is also shown in the portable capacity calculation. In order to allow for flexibility in portable usage the District will use an average class size calculation of 21 for each Elementary portable and an average class size of 25 for each Middle and High School portable. The information is organized with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, middle school, and high school levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year. 24 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued Capacity Summary-All Grades Actual Budget -- Projected-- Calendar Year 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 CAPACITY School Year 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 22,592 22,957 22,957 22,957 23,569 23,569 23,569 23,569 Add Capacity : : 0:: : O::: : : : : : :0 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 22,957 22,957 22,957 23,569 23,569 23,569 23,569 23,569 ENROLLMENT Basic Headcount Enrollment 20,568 20,714 21,044 21,176 21,238 21,322 21,493 21,642 Internet Academy Headcount Enrollment' (255) (255) (255) (255) (255) (255) (255) (255) Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 20,313 20,459 20,789 20,921 20,983 21,067 21,238 21,387 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM ITECAPACITY 2,644 2,498 1 2,168 2,648 2,586 2,502 2,331 2,182 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY Current Portable Capacity 1,685 1,685 1,643 1,645 1,697 1,749 1,801 1,853 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Add/Subtract Portable Capacity A: 252: : :52: : : ::: Adjusted Portable Capacity 1,685 1,643 1,645 1 1,697 1 1,749 1 1,801 1,853 1,905 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 4,329 4,141 3,813 4,345 4,335 4,303 4,184 4,087 NOTES: 1 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities.This represents historic enrollment. 25 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued Capacity Summary—Elementary Schools Actual Budget -- Pro ected-- Calendar Y ear 2023 2024 2025 202.E 2027 2028 2029 2030 CAPACITY School Year _M11-23 2023-21 20 4-25 2023-26 2046-27 2027-28 2028 9 2029-30 BL7]LDT—N-G PROGR_A\4 FEED COUZvT CAPACM 11,065 11,193 1L193 11,193 11,805 11,805 11,805 11,805 Add.Subtract capacity total 128 0 0 612 0 0 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Add capacity at Star Lake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lie a:n . .a5 . . . . . 0 -m k Dew K-S i Qi=i i i= i : i c i i i : i : : i i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjusted Progrm Headcount Capacity 11.193 11,193 11,193 1 11,905 11,805 11,805 11.805 ENROU'X E'kT Basic Headcount Enrollment 9,317 9:456 9,617 976W 97747 9,786 9,86 99,933 Internet Academy.Headcount (20) ,20, C ) (20) ::0} (20) Basic Headcount.Eatollment rt ithout Internet Ati demo, 9 297 9,436 597 9.619 9,727 9,766 :'.S_s 9:933 SLMnUS OR 0L-NHOUSED) PROGF—W CMACHY 1,8% 1,7 ` L 96 2,126 2.078 1.039 IS61 R OCATAIRU CAPACM Current Portable Capacity 931 931 889 889 889 889 889 s s Add Subtract portable capacity (42) 0 0 0 0 a 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Add portable capacity at: Subtract portable capacity at: Lain Grebe lhrrar Lake Star Lyre Wt p . . . . . . . . . . . Adjusted Portable.Capacity 931 ss;' 889 1 889 1 889 ss; 889 889 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGR..AXi AAD RELOCATAIU CAPACITY 2,827 2,646 2A85 3,015 1 2,967 2.928 Z.s.=a 2.761 NOTES: 1 Capacity increases are projected based on a design to accommodate 525 students-Increased capacity is currently stated as the difference between current calculated capacity and the projected design.In order to reduce elementary class size.De%Yy capacity is calculated at 17 scholars per classroom. 2 In ternet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school&c ities.This represents historic enrollment. 3 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available.This is a calculated number only based on class size capacity of 21.The actual number of portables that kvill be used will be based on actual student population needs. 26 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued Capacity Summary—Middle Schools Actual Budget -- Projected-- Calendar Year 2023 2024 2025 2026 2M 2028 1 2029 2030 C-ARAICITY School Year 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2025-29 2029-30 BUILDD G PROGR-A-M HEADC LT T CAPACITY 5-074 5,074 5,074 5,074 5,074 5,074 5,074 5e07= Add'Subtract capacity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Add capacity*at:. �L'eYj1'ee}71 TilClhae .•.• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . Adjusted Pro Headcount Ca achy 5.074 5,074 5,014 5.074 5.0?4 5,074 5,074 5.074 E'NROLL-NiEN T Basic Headcount Enrollment 4,719 4,800 4,993 4923 4,916 -1966 5,005 1,105 55y 55 (55 55 (15� 55 r; Internet Academy' (- 1 (- � } (- } 4_-: ( ) Basic Enrollment cithout Internet Academy 4.664 4.745 4.828 4.568 4,891 4-950 4950 SLRPLti S OR(I N-HOU:SER) PROGR —NI CAP-- CRY 410 329 246 2045 1,93 163 124 12-1 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY'' Current Portable CapacitF ryS ;JS _S 2SS 2S� 2Ss 2SS 2SS Add Subtract portable capacity 0 U 0 0 0 0 9 Eierg'een Ifiddle School Sacajsrwea-lfiddle School Rlahee ifiddle School Adjusted Portable Capacity =3S 33S 2SS 28S 2S3 '-SS 2SS 288 STIRPLti S OR(U-NHOUi SED) PROGR.A-M ADD RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 74S 667 -934 494 471 451 412 412 NOTES: 1 Evergreen and Illahee Middle Schools currently-have capacity-for 800&850 students respectively,so no new capacity-is anticipated w7th the rebuild of these older buildings. 2 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities.This represents historic:enrollment- 3 Relocatable Capacity-is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily-house students until permanent facilities are available.This is a calculated number only.based on class size capacity of 25.The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. 27 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARIES,Continued Capacity Summary—High Schools Actual Budget -- Projected-- Calendar Year 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 CAPACITY School Year 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 5,853 6,090 6,090 6,090 6,090 6,090 6,090 6,090 Add/Subtract capacity 237 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Thomas Jefferson High School Z3? : : : : : : : : : : : : : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 6,090 6,090 6,090 6,090 6,090 6,090 6,090 6,090 ENROLLNMVT Basic Headcount Enrollment 6,532 6,473 6.558 6.569 6,559 6,586 6,638 6,698 Internet A cademy' (180) (180) (180) (180) (180) (180) (180) (180) Basic Ed without Internet Academy 6,352 6,293 6,378 6,389 6,379 6,406 6,458 6.518 SURPLUS OR RMOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY (262) (203) (288) 1 (299) (289) (316) (368) (428) RELOCATABLE CAPACITYZ Current Portable Capacity 416 416 416 520 624 728 832 936 Add/Subtract portable capacity 0 0 52 52 52 52 52 52 As Needed on High School Campuses -Sx: : : :.:.32 : Z: : : : : : : : : : 2 .... Adjusted Portable Capacity 416 416 520 624 728 832 936 1,040 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 154 213 232 325 439 516 568 612 NOTES: I Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities.This represents historic enrollment. 2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available.This is a calculated number only based on class size capacity of 25.The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. 3 Capacity for unhoused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and no planning time in some classrooms. 28 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Single and Multi-Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substantially adopted by the City of Auburn, Federal Way, and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that district. Impact Fee Calculation When applicable, the CFP includes variables for the calculation of the Impact Fee for single family and multi-family units based on King County Code 2 1 A and the Growth Management Act. Plan Year 2023 Plan Year 2024 Single Family Units $0 $0 Multi-Family Units $0 $6,998 Impact Fee Calculation - King County Code 21A 29 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS, CON'T School Site Acquisition Cost: Student Student Facility Cost/ Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 0 0.1705 0.7104 $0 $0 Middle School 0.0682 0.3665 $0 $0 High School 0.0958 0.3665 $0 $0 TOTAL SO $0 School Construction Cost: Student Student %Perm Fac./ Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total Sq Ft Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 96.61% 0 0.1705 0.7104 $0 $0 Middle School 98.36% 0.0682 0.3665 $0 $0 High School 98.28% $16,017,095 237 0.0958 0.3665 $6,363 $24,344 TOTAL $6,363 $24,344 Temporary Facility Cost: Student Student %Temp Fac. Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total Sq Ft Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 4.60% 0.1705 0.7104 $0 $0 Middle School 2.75% 0.0682 0.3665 $0 $0 High School 1.21% 0.0958 0.3665 $0 $0 TOTAL $O $O School Construction Assistance Program Credit Calculation: Student Student Construction Cost Sq.Ft. State Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Allocation/Sq Ft Student Match SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 24683.00% 0.1705 0.7104 $0 $0 Middle School 24683.00% 0.0682 0.3665 $0 $0 High School 24683.00% $130 1 0.0958 0.3665 $1,963 $7,510 Total $1,963 $7,510 Tax Payment Credit Calculation SFR MFR Average Assessed Value` (April 2022) $590,378 $236,260 Capital Bond Interest Rate(February 2022) 3.58% 3.58% Net Present Value of Average Dwelling $4,890,202 $1,956,982 Years Amortized 10 10 Property Tax Levy Rate $1.45 $1.45 Present Value of Revenue Stream $7,091 $2,838 Single Family Multi-Family Residences Residences Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost $ - $ - Permanent Facility Cost $ 6,363 $ 24,344 Temporary Facility Cost $ - $ - State Match Credit $ (1,963) $ (7,510) TaxPayment Credit $ (7,091) $ (2,838) Sub-Total S (2,691) $ 13,996 501/o Local Share $ (1,345) $ 6,998 Calculated Impact Feel $ - S 6,998 Each jurisdiction(King County,Cities of Federal Way,Auburn,Kent)through local ordinances may adopt lesserfees. 2Due to the high number of affordable housing projects in Federal Way there is a significant difference between Appraised and Taxable values. We have chosen to use the Appraised value to give a higher credit to future 30 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION, CON'T SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COST Consistent with the capacity calculations described earlier, the District uses the OSPI square footage calculation for determining capacity at our secondary schools. Based on this methodology, the following construction costs for Thomas Jefferson High School are allocated as the proportionate share: Square Footage Capacity at approx. 131 s . ft. Current: 179,119 1378 Planned: 210,000 1615 Increased Capacity 237 Increase as % 17.24% GMP $92,903,922 Proportionate Share $16,017,095 The District will use the above formulas created as a base for future Capital Facilities Plans during the life of the current bond authorization. The capacity of these schools may vary from year to year as programs are added or changed and construction cost may increase over time. FACILITIES CAPACITY Permanent Facility Capacity: Changes to the Building Program Capacities calculation are found on page 16. Capacity Summaries: The changes in the Capacity Summary reflect the changes in the capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 24-27. Student Generation Factor Analysis: Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single-family units and multi-family units. The factors used in the 2023 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single- family units and multi-family units that were constructed in the District in the last five (5) years and can be found on the next page Temporary Facility Cost: The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on pages 17 and 18. 31 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN STUDENT GENERATION RATES New Construction 2018-2022 _._...........- ...........__.............__....._..__._..........__........_................- _........__......:...._..........____...........-- ...-- ----.... _ .. -- -- .._.......---...........-- ....-- - ..............._ ...._..._ Single tamUy Homes KG is 2nd 3rd i 4th 5th ESTobli 6th ........7th......... 8th._.. MS T*W: 4th lath nth [ 12th HS TobI! Total: ._............._...................._............._.--...........___.........__..._.... ....._.._._.._.,...._.......... -_.... __..._......--- ...__ .... _._... _. -. ...... ....._..... Erneratd Greens 16 0 2 2 •- _..2-.. .._ .6..... 3 ... .. 1. .._ 2!__...1_. _... ...1.._.._ ....._. ...... 2......._.....10_ .........---_........._____........._....._...:.......__..._....._.-._....._-___......-_---..........._.__......___._...,..__.......... .........____ ..._ _..........._ __ ... ___....._-_.... ._ - - _-' - - -_ HaYertwoad Park ! 84 0 ! 4 2 4 1 [ 3 14i 1 i 1 2i 1 _.. _ _2.. _5..._.. ........___4 _ p ___..........._.._.............____............ ..................._.......___......____ ...._....__..._____..........___.....__._ .____.._.__.....___-._.__.,_.___.._ ....__ _ _. _ _ ._ __... _ < iHuntingtan Woods _7_3 _ _S _1 Z 2 2 2 10 2 3 .5.u1._ _Z..... ...4_ ___......7......_......_g= Jovita ke;Eitts......._..___..._.. 107 5� `: 7 1 6 i "s 3 22 2 7._.. 2 _-11. ....._.. ....7 ... -_4.... ...^-3 ....._12: 45i take Kittamey(states; 14 ! 2 .. ...2 ........._. ....___. ._.......0............_._5 ..._____...___.__.._........._.__....__..__ __...........__............._........__>__......-__.__.:.._�......______..__ ._ ___.. _ _ _.. ......:.... .. ._ Monglien20 .,,,,,,__I.._....__._..._....__._....--..........__t_.................. ?: __.. __..._ -_�>'__._..... 2.._ ..__... ._....__ ...._..__ t Panf"x Heights 41 1 3 2 3 , 2...... 2. E3.... 0 1 ._.._�.3 ....._.._5. ?..... ii __.......3;-......_.___u€ ;Retreat Meadows 56 2 S 2 1 6- _.. 1 1.._.. _ 2 1...... ._....3_... ...__3__..... .....___ _7 is; _._.........._.___.._......____.............__.-._.._......-....._.._.<._.........__......:_..___.._.._.._...___.._..-__ -__.... . ...._..-__„ _.. ._....... _... _ .._ _ _ _ _ ....; iStarwater Ig a 0..... ......0. .._3 1,.... _l. ...._.____..........__.._......_..___..:.......___.._..__. .._._..__._._....i...._..___..__...._..;_......_.___..........__ _ ..........__........_ ......____ __ _____._. __...._.__ .__.- _ _ ..___...._.__ _.._. .__......... i WyRaest FI 41 Z .......1--.__.._ ......_._ ...3 ...._1. 1._. ......__71 ---'2 ._._ ._..._3i........._... ......_ .......... 0...-_.,.10 i NOR-SubdiYisian 145 6 2 5 _.._..____...._..__`__..._l _.........8.._-•- Zzm...... 3 _•-.3.._�._ 4 10€ g _ 3 .__..5......_ _ .7....� _21_.._ 53 _ T¢ID! 636 20 21 15 20 7 T? 106 12 ... 17 33....._ .42.�..._10..... 20... 16 ........13_..... .54 206 .......___........................._.:.._.._._.._..-_.._...._.__._:__.._.__......-___._......____.........___..._...._....------- _ _ _ ._....._-__..._-. ___...._. __ -__ ___ __._.. ___......_..___ ... Medti famiy URits KG ist 2nd ._- 4_.......4th.,-,, Sth ` ES-'--5th ._ 7th .... ,8th €MS Todd 4th ; .lath Slth_i ]Nh HS Toeais Tocaii ...__ .._..w_.__.__. . _.- _ ...__.. ._ ..... _ _ - .21 Watermark(650� 221 1 33 1 23 1 32 1 20 25 i 23 357 25_ 28 8 _ 81 25 20. �19 17 ffi .319. 20 19 17 81 338 . MS_.._......_..._.__..__....___.�......__...-...._T...._.___....._..__...._....._m.......____............_._..._.........___..........._-_-......_.._.__......�...___.........._ Hamel._. FS HS ! ES SGR!MS HSSGR':.Tara(SHBi :Emerald Greens 16 6 2 ......? 6_3750.__i_.01250 [ 0;1250 Ob250 ............ . _... .. .... Havenwoad Park ..-�..-..........-14._.....-:-........_.-....... 4 0.1667 0_0238 [ 0.047b 0.2381- _.......__-...........__......._�. ....___._.......�.0..._-_.c.... __-......7 .. iHumirton Woods 73 30 ! 5 7 0.3370 i 0.0685 0.0454 01014 _......_.__........____.........___........._._......_:____.._._.__...:................._ .-....._.-_.......:...-_......._:_.. _._ .... _-....... lovita Heights .107 22 SI 11 0.2056 [ 0_1028 0.1121 OA206- lakeKillameyEstates: 14 ? ,,. v.....____..........-__..........__...�__..-._._......_._. 3__...L........._2 0. 0243 01429 0.0010 0.3511 _-......._ 1 ..__.............'MwEeeri ZO 2 OJT 0:00 01000 M20Q__........._- _. Pacific Heights 41 13 i 5 3 0.3171 01220 i 0.0732 03M ;Retreat Meadows ,56 6 s 2 7 0.1071 0.0357 0.3250 0.2679 -...........___...........___.........-.-. __.._.........._.«--.........----...._...._-............_ _.._.___ __.._......._ _.........____ .........-<-..........__ 0.0000 € OAD00 0:0526....OAS26.... S�_...rer.._...........__........i?......_L......�__-_.;....._.�. 1---......:....-.......___.. ___i...... ...._s jWyrraest li 41 _._......___�......... ..........3__...... _0 0.1707 € 0.0732 0.000f1 02139 ___........._.._........_...__...........�_..........__ _ ...._ ......._�. ............__-.....____............__ _........ ;NOn-SubdirisioR 145 22 10 ,21__ 0.1517 O.a%90 0.1448 rt.03655...< - .� __.....___....__.__ ___.... ... ... Totai .........�..616 ......._105 .....42 ....: 54 - Qi705 l 0.0682 00m - ®.3341 ........_..........._.__...._.._.-._. _.-........._-'-_.............___....,.....___..........-___..........._____ _._............-__..........___: ........._._.........._..................: imda U.7Y 1 Units ......_ES MS ..-....__ ._......-i-ES SGi3 MS SGR i HS.SGR y'ToblSfiR _..........._..__...........____........._•-__..........____.. .........___ 21-Watermark .......ZZl........_---...157-_. 81 81 0.710C i 0.360..�-0.3665... 1A434.... 81 0.7104 > 0 65 _ O-MAS IA434 32 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2023 to 2024 Item From/To Comment Percent of Permanent Facilities 96.95%to 97.65% Report 93 OSPI Percent Temporary Facilities 3.05%to 2.41% Updated portable inventory Average Cost of Portable $128,646 to$231,523 Cost of last portable purchased. Classrooms Construction Cost Allocation $246.83 to$246.83 Change effective July 2022 (2023 not available at time of production) State Match 62.95%to 63.86% Change effective July 2022 (2023 not available at time of production) Average Assessed Value Per King County Assessor's Office SFR- $465,326 to$581,023 Single-family residences MFR- $171,672 to$198,069 Apartments(2023 data corrected) Capital Bond Interest Rate 2.45%to 3.58% Market Rate Property Tax Levy Rate $1.85 to$1.45 King County Treasury Division Student Generation Factors Updated Housing Inventory Single-Family Note:Student generation factors for our Elementary 0.1627 to 0.1705 single fcunily units are based on new developments constructed within the District Middle School 0.0278 to 0.0682 over the last five(5)years prior to the date of High School 0.0516 to 0.0958 the fee calculation. Multi-Family Student generation f ctorsforare rnulti- Elementary 0.5158 to 0.7104 family units are based on new developments constructed within the District over the last Middle School 0.3167 to 0.3665 five(5)years prior to the date ofthe fee High School 0.2081 to 0.3665 calculation. Impact Feel SFR- $0 to$0 Single-Family Residential based on the updated calculation MFR- $0 to$6,998 Multi-Family Residential based on the updated calculation Each jurisdiction(King County,Cities of Federal Way,Auburn,Kent)through local ordinances may adopt lesser fees. 33 Exhibit C - Highline CFP HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 401 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2023-2028 HIGHLINE PUBLIC SC HOOLS Adopted: July 12, 2023 HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 401 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2023-2028 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Aaron Garcia, President Joe Van, Vice President Angelica Alvarez Azeb Hegos Carrie Howell SUPERINTENDENT Dr. Ivan Duran Table of Contents Page Introduction..................................................:...................................................................................I Standardof Service..........................................................................................................................4 CapitalFacilities Inventory..............................................................................................................6 Student Enrollment Trends and Projections ..................................................................................10 Capital Facilities Projections for Future Needs .............................................................................I I FinancingPlan ...............................................................................................................................13 SchoolImpact Fees........................................................................................................................15 AppendixA: District Maps ......................................................................................................... A-1 Appendix B: Population and Enrollment Data ............................................................................B-1 Appendix C: Student Generation Rates/Data............................................................................... C-1 For information regarding the Highline School District's 2023-2028 Capital Facilities Plan, contact Ellie Daneshnia, Executive Director, Capital Planning and Construction, Highline School District No. 401, 17810 8t'Avenue South, Building A, Burien, Washington 98148. Telephone: (206)631-7500 SECTION ONE: INTRODUCTION Purpose of the Capital Facilities Plan This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan has been prepared by the Highline School District (the "District") as the District's primary facility planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act(the"GMA")and King County Council Code Title 21 A. The Plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2023. The GMA outlines 13 broad goals including adequate provision of necessary public facilities and services. Schools are among these necessary facilities and services. School districts have adopted capital facilities plans to satisfy the requirements of RCW 36.70A.070 and to identify additional school facilities necessary to meet the educational needs of the growing student populations anticipated in their districts. The Highline School District(the"District")has prepared this Capital Facilities Plan(the"CFP") to provide King County (the "County") and the cities of Burien, Des Moines, Kent, Normandy Park, SeaTac,and Tukwila with a schedule and financing program for capital improvements over the next six years (2023-2028). The District will update this Plan annually and include any necessary changes to the impact fee schedule. Executive Summary The District experienced steady enrollment increases between 2010 and 2017. However, 2018 and 2019 enrollment decreased from the previous years, and the global pandemic resulted in further declines. Enrollment projections from December 2022 show a continuing decline in enrollment over the next five years and gradual increases just beyond the five-year planning period. The District currently serves an approximate student population of 17,341 (October 1, 2022 enrollment). The District reconfigured grade levels in the fall of 2019 and now serves grades K- 5 in 18 elementary schools, grades 6-8 in five middle-level schools, and grades 9-12 in five high schools. In addition, the District has alternative programs: Big Picture (MS and HS) at the Manhattan site; CHOICE Academy (MS and HS) at the Woodside site; New Start (9-12) at the Salmon Creek Site currently but will be moving to Southern Heights as of September 2023; Maritime High School at the Olympic Interim site and Highline Virtual Academy will be moved from Olympic to Southern Heights; and Puget Sound Skills Center("PSSC"). Over the last 20 years, the District has embarked on a major capital improvement effort to enhance its facilities to meet current educational and life-safety standards. Since 2002, the District has passed three major capital bonds: one in 2002 for approximately $189,000,000, one in 2006 for approximately $148,000,000, and one in 2016 for approximately $299,850,000. The 2002 and 2006 bonds were used for the replacement of existing facilities and not to accommodate increased enrollment. The 2016 bonds facilitated a combination of improvements to/replacement - 1 - of existing facilities and the provision of new capacity. With the approved capital bond funds and reimbursements from the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, the State of Washington, the Port of Seattle, the Federal Aviation Administration, and private donations for a new Raisbeck Aviation High School,the District has designed, permitted, and constructed 14 new elementary schools, 1 new middle school, 2 new high schools, renovated 3 schools as interim facilities, and renovated portions of Memorial Field and Camp Waskowitz. All this work has been done since March 2002. The District's 2016 bond proposal was based on the recommendations of a Capital Facilities Advisory Committee ("CFAC"), a citizens' committee representing every part of the District. The committee met for a year to study the District's facilities needs, review data, such as enrollment projections and building conditions, and analyze various solutions. CFAC developed a long-term facilities plan, which includes the 2016 bond as the first phase of a four-phase plan to meet students' needs over the next 20 years. The 2016 bond projects included new capacity at the elementary and middle school levels to accommodate enrollment needs and the implementation of recent legislation. Specifically, the District constructed a new Des Moines Elementary to replace the existing school and increase its student capacity, added classrooms at existing elementary schools, built the new Glacier Middle School, and constructed a new Highline High School to replace the existing school and increase its student capacity. The District does not anticipate the need at this time for additional land to accommodate the new schools; however, the land will be necessary in the future to support the District's long-range facilities plan and the Educational Strategic Plan. CFAC provided recommendations in the Spring of 2019 regarding the second phase plan for a bond proposal. Those recommendations included rebuilding (with added capacity) Evergreen High School, Tyee High School, and Pacific Middle School, as well as several non-capacity replacements and critical need projects. The design of Tyee and Evergreen High Schools and Pacific Middle School,through 50% schematic design, was included in the 2016 Bond. In June 2022, the District Board of Directors adopted a resolution to send the bond proposals to the voters for consideration in the amount of$518,397,000. The voters approved the proposal in November 2022 with an overwhelming 68.84 percent. The 2022 bond projects include the construction of new schools to replace existing buildings at Evergreen High School, Tyee High School, and Pacific Middle School. The 2022 bond projects all include District-wide critical capital improvements, including but not limited to (1) making emergency repairs; (2) constructing a new building to replace Transportation Building L; (3) providing sites, facilities and spaces for virtual programs; (4) providing capital contributions for Maritime High School; (5) making roof restoration and remedial repairs; (6) acquiring and installing Sylvester Middle School Synthetic Field; (7) making exterior and interior finish improvements; and (8) making other health, safety, security, and capital improvements, all as determined necessary and advisable by the Board. As part of the 2022 bond to construct new schools, Tyee High School students will attend school at the Olympic Interim Site in Des Moines for two years starting in September 2023. Maritime - 2 - High School will continue at the Olympic Interim Site and share the space with Tyee High School starting in September 2023. Highline Virtual Academy (HVA) will relocate from the Olympic Interim Site to space in the former Southern Heights Elementary building, starting September 2023, and the Highline Virtual Elementary(HVE) school, also currently at Olympic Interim,will relocate to Seahurst Elementary starting September 2023. The HVE move is due to low enrollment and decreasing demand for elementary online options. HVE was designed to serve 150 students. With enrollment far lower than projected, HVE is not fiscally sustainable as a stand-alone school(and,due to state limitations on out of district enrollment in the program, recruiting out-of-district students is not a viable option). HVE teachers will continue to teach remote classes. Seahurst Elementary School will retain its in-person classrooms serving all neighborhood students. New Start High School will relocate to the former Southern Heights Elementary building starting September 2023. This move will provide improved accommodation for New Start students and staff. Southern Heights Elementary School closed at the end of the 2021-22 school year due to shrinking enrollment. Southern Heights is in the best condition of the surplus district sites available for school relocation. The district is making improvements at that site this summer to accommodate the need of New Start High School and Highline Virtual Academy. This CFP identifies the current enrollment,the current capacity of each educational facility as well as programmed improvements, and the projected enrollment over the six-year planning period. This CFP does not recommend a schedule of impact fees for new development. However, the District intends to closely monitor enrollment patterns and future updates to this CFP may include an impact fee recommendation where supported by projected enrollment increases and related capacity needs. - 3 - SECTION 2—STANDARD OF SERVICE King County Code 21 A.06 refers to a"Standard of Service"that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. School facility and student capacity needs are dictated by the types and amounts of space required to accommodate the District's adopted educational program. The educational program standards which typically drive facility space needs include grade configuration, optimum facility size, class size, educational program offerings, classroom utilization and scheduling requirements, and use of relocatable classrooms (portables). District educational program standards may change in the future as a result of changes in the education program, special programs class sizes, grade span configurations, and use of new technology, as well as other physical aspects of the school facilities. In addition, the District implemented reduced K-3 class sizes in the fall of 2019, which impacted school capacity and educational program standards. (The District implemented full-day kindergarten previously.) The school capacity inventory will be reviewed periodically and adjusted for any changes to the educational program standards. These changes will also be reflected in future updates of this CFP. The Standard of Service outlined below reflects only those programs and educational opportunities provided to students that directly affect the capacity of school buildings. The special programs listed below require classroom space,thus the permanent capacity of some buildings housing these programs has been reduced. Table I Class Size—Standard of Service Grade Level Average Class Size Based on Standard of Service Kindergarten 17 Grades I —3 17 Grades 4—5 27 Grades 6—8 29 Grades 9— 12 29 It is not possible to achieve 100%utilization of all regular teaching stations throughout the day. Therefore, classroom capacity is adjusted using a utilization factor of available teaching stations depending on the physical characteristics of the facility and educational program needs. - 4 - Elementary School Standard of Service Models • Special education for students with disabilities may be provided in self- contained classrooms. • All students are provided music instruction in a separate classroom. • Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms designated as follows: • Resource Rooms • English Language Learners(ELL) • Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) • Gifted Education • Learning Assisted Programs • Severely Behavior Disorder • Transition Rooms • Mild, Moderate, and Severe Disabilities • Developmental Kindergarten • Extended Daycare Programs and Preschool Programs Secondary School Standard of Service Models • Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms designated as follows: • Resource Rooms • English Language Learners(ELL) • Science Labs • Career and Vocational Rooms • Daycare Programs • Alternative Program Spaces - 5 - SECTION THREE: CAPITAL FACILITIES INVENTORY This section provides an inventory of capital facilities owned and operated by the District including schools and relocatable classrooms (modular or portables). School facility capacity was inventoried based on the space required to accommodate the District's adopted educational program standards.See Section Two: Standard of Service. A map showing the locations of District facilities is provided in Appendix A. Schools See Section One for a description of the District's schools and programs. School capacity was determined based on the number of teaching stations (or general classrooms) within each building and the space requirements of the District's adopted current educational program and internal targets as reported to the Information and Condition of Schools (ICOS) system with the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction. It is this capacity calculation that is used to establish the District's baseline capacity and to determine future capacity needs based on projected student enrollment. The school capacity inventory is summarized in Tables 2, 3, and 4. Relocatable Classrooms (Portables) Relocatable classrooms (portables) are used as interim classroom space to house students until funding can be secured to construct permanent classrooms. The District currently uses 57 relocatable classrooms at various school sites throughout the District to provide additional interim general classroom capacity. A typical relocatable classroom can provide capacity for a full-size class of students. Current use of relocatable classrooms throughout the District is summarized in Table 5. -6- Table 2 Elementary School Level Inventory Building Area Teaching Permanent Elementary School (sq.ft.) Stations X Capacity*" Beverly Park at Glendale ES 58,145 22 447 Bow Lake ES 74,729 23 467 Cedarhurst ES 67,188 25 508 Des Moines ES 84,568 38 771 Gregory Heights ES 65,978 22 447 Hazel Valley ES 65,294 23 467 Hilltop ES 56,862 24 487 Madrona ES 69,240 25 508 Marvista ES 66,421 25 508 McMicken Heights ES 68,378 22 447 Midway ES 66,096 22 447 Mount View ES 67,783 26 528 North Hill ES 70,085 27 548 Parkside ES 66,990 22 447 Seahurst ES 59,967 20 548 Shorewood ES 60,326 22 447 White Center ES*** 70,854 28 609 TOTAL 1,138,904 416 8,628 *Teaching Station definition: A space designated as a classroom.Other stations include spaces designated for special education and pull-out programs. ** Regular classrooms. -7- Table 3 Middle School Level Inventory"** Middle School Building Area Teaching Stations* Permanent (sq.ft.) Capacity** Cascade MS 87,957 33 957 Chinook MS 101,433 27 783 Glacier MS 142,104 37 1073 Pacific MS 70,441 24 696 Sylvester MS 89,117 28 812 Big Picture MS (at Manhattan) 2 58 Choice (at Woodside) 2 58 TOTAL 491,052 153 4,437 *Teaching Station Definition:A space designated as a general classroom.Other stations include spaces designated for special education and pull-out programs. ** Regular classrooms. ***Does not include alternative programs: CHOICE MS capacity at Woodside site. Table 4 High School Level Inventory*** Building Area Teaching Permanent High School (sq.ft.) Stations* Capacity Raisbeck Aviation HS 87,934 14 406 Big Picture HS (at Manhattan) 29,141 10 290 Evergreen HS 161,456 48 1392 Highline HS 291,009 53 1537 Mount Rainier HS 207,159 55 1595 Tyee HS 129,017 38 1102 TOTALS 905,716 218 6,322 *Teaching Station definition: A space designated as a general classroom.Other stations include spaces designated for special education and pull-out programs. ** Regular classrooms. ***Does not include alternative programs: CHOICE HS capacity at Woodside site;New Start HS at Salmon Creek site; Puget Sound Skills Center; Maritime High School and Highline Virtual Academy,which are located at the Olympic Interim site currently. -8- Table 5 Relocatable Classrooms (Portable)Inventory Elementary School Relocatable** Other*** Interim Capacity Beverly Park at Glendale 0 2 0 Bow Lake 3 1 61 Cedarhurst 4 0 81 Des Moines 0 0 0 Gregory Heights 0 2 0 Hazel Valley 3 1 61 Hilltop 5 1 102 Madrona 2 0 41 Marvista 2 0 41 McMicken Heights 0 0 0 Midway 4 0 81 Mount View 4 0 81 North Hill 0 0 0 Parkside 0 0 0 Seahurst 2 2 41 Shorewood 2 2 41 Southern Heights 2 1 41 White Center 4 0 81 TOTAL 37 12 751.1 Middle School Relocatable** Other *** Interim Capacity Cascade 3 0 87 Chinook 5 1 145 Glacier 0 0 0 Pacific 4 0 116 Sylvester 4 0 116 Big Picture MS 4 7 116 TOTAL 20 8 580 High School Relocatable** Other*** Interim Capacity Raisbeck Aviation HS 0 0 0 Big Picture HS 0 0 0 Evergreen HS 0 4 0 Highline HS 0 0 0 Mount Rainier HS 0 0 0 Tyee HS 0 2 0 TOTALS 0 6 0 **Used for regular classroom capacity. ***The relocatable referenced under"other relocatable"are used for special pull-out programs,storage, community use,etc. -9- SECTION FOUR: STUDENT ENROLLMENT TRENDS AND PROJECTIONS Generally, enrollment projections using historical calculations are most accurate for the initial years of the forecast period. Moving further into the future, more assumptions about economic conditions, land use, and demographic trends in the area affect the projection. Monitoring birth rates in the County and population growth for the area are essential yearly activities in the ongoing management of the CFP. In the event that enrollment growth slows, plans for new facilities can be delayed. It is much more difficult, however, to initiate new projects or expedite projects in the event enrollment growth exceeds the projections. In October 2020, the District's enrollment was 17,745 (headcount). By October 2021, headcount enrollment declined by 269 students to 17,476 and declined further in October 2022 to 17,341. This decline reflects the trend in other King County school districts and also, with regard to the District, includes lower kindergarten enrollment than expected as some parents decided to wait through the pandemic prior to enrolling students in school. Like other school districts, the global pandemic impacted enrollment. New housing growth also slowed in the District after the completion of several major projects. Some, but not all, of the enrollment decline was previously projected. With the assistance of a professional demographer,the District has developed its own methodology for forecasting future enrollments. This methodology, a modified cohort survival method, considers a variety of factors to evaluate the potential student population growth for the years 2023 through 2032.These factors include projected births,projected growth in the K-12 population,and a model that considers growth in population and housing within the District's boundaries. The methodology also considers the impacts on enrollment related to charter school enrollment within the District's boundaries with certain assumptions related to recent trends. Therefore, the methodology and the resulting projections are considered conservative. District enrollment increased by 5.2% between 2010 and 2016, with enrollment declining thereafter through the current year. December 2022 projections show a continuing K-12 decline over the five-year planning period with increases occurring thereafter. Using the modified cohort survival projections, the District expects a total enrollment of 17,054 students in 2028 and a total enrollment of 17,461 by 2032. See Appendix B. The District will closely monitor enrollment and make adjustments as necessary. Future updates to this CFP will identify any adjustments or changes. Table 6 Projected Student Enrollment 2022-2028 Actual Percent Projection 2022x 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Change Change 17,341 17,223 17,139 16926 16,835 16,904 17,054 (287) -1.66% *Actual October 2022 enrollment. -10- SECTION FIVE: CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECTIONS FOR FUTURE NEEDS Projected future capacity needs, shown in Table 7, are derived by applying the projected number of students to the projected permanent capacity. It is not the District's policy to include relocatable classrooms when determining future capital facility needs;therefore,the interim capacity provided by relocatable classrooms is not included in this analysis. The District will utilize relocatable classrooms as necessary to address interim capacity needs. Information on relocatable classrooms by grade level and interim capacity can be found in Table 5. Information on planned construction projects can be found in the Financing Plan, Table 8. -11- Table 7 Projected Student Capacity-2023 through 2028 LEMENTARY SCHOOL actual Oct. 2_ ? > > r- > 27 f > > aCILITIES 2022 0_i_� 0_d-_� 0_�_6 0_6 r R_ 3 R_8-_9 erianent Capacity 8.628 8.628 S.628 8.628 8.62S S.62S S_6_S apacit additions otal Permanent Capacity S.62S 8.628 8,628 S.62S S.62S 8.628 5.628 rojzcted Enrolhtment -59 -.664 -.539 -.496 7.632 -.690 ermanent Capacity 869 964 1010 1132 996 938 902 tuplus!(Deficit) FUDDLEL actual Oct. 7 22;> > > 25 > 25 > > 27 > 2 T i > >2022 y 4.43- 4.43- 4.4; 4.43- 4.43- 4.43- -4.691 254 Total Pernmarient Capacity 4,43- 4.43 4.43 4.43 4.43 4,691 4.691 rojzctzd Emollmmmzut 3.6SS 3.533 3.636 3.610 3.641 3.639 3.665 eimanent Capacity -49 904 SO1 827 ,96 798 1Q26 urplus(Oeficit) Pacific Middle School-Mll be replaced with added capacity for a total capacity of 950 rIGHHHOOL actual Oct. 2� 23 23 > > 25 2�? ? 27 2' 0___ 0_ 4 0_-1_" 0_"_6 Q_6_ _0_r _8 IES 1-021 FTE Capacity 6.3„ 6.322 6.3'_- 6.322 6.420 6.420 6.420 dditions 9S anent Capacity 6.322 6.3'_2 6, '_2 6.420 6.4^_0 6.420 6.420 Enrolhment 5.894 6.026 5.W S.S_I 5.562 5.5-5 5.663 t Capacity 4_8 296 35' 501 85S S45eficitl Tyee High School will be replaced Niith added capacity for a total capacity of 1.200 -12- SECTION SIX: FINANCING PLAN Planned Improvements The Finance Plan includes the 2022 Bond projects, with some preplanning costs funded by the 2016 Bond. Under the 2016 bond, the District: (1) added the new Des Moines Elementary School, (2) constructed new elementary school classrooms at various sites, and (3) constructed a the New Glacier Middle School on land owned by the District. These projects accommodated recent growth within the District. The 2016 Bond also funded "non-capacity" capital needs at existing schools including the replacement of Highline High School and safety/security improvements at various schools. The 2022 Bond funds the replacement of both Evergreen and Tyee High Schools, as well as the replacement of Pacific Middle School. The bond also includes District-wide critical capital needs improvements including, but not limited to (1) making emergency repairs; (2) constructing a new building to replace Transportation Building L; (3)providing sites, facilities, and spaces for virtual programs; (4) providing capital contributions for Maritime High School; (5) making roof restoration and remedial repairs; (6) acquiring and installing Sylvester Middle School Synthetic Field; (7) making exterior and interior finish improvements; and (8) making other health, safety, security, and capital improvements, all as determined necessary and advisable by the Board. Financing for Planned Improvements Funding for planned improvements is typically secured from several sources including voter- approved bonds, State match funds, and impact fees. General Obligation Bonds: Bonds are typically used to fund the construction of new schools and other capital improvement projects and require a 60% voter approval. The District's voters in November 2022 approved by 68.84% a $518 million school construction bond, which included funding for completion planning and construction of the Pacific Middle School, Evergreen High School, and Tyee High School projects. The 2022 Bond also includes funding for District-wide critical capital improvements determined necessary and advisable by the Board. State School Construction Assistance Program Funds: State School Construction Assistance funds come from the Common School Construction Fund. The State deposits revenue from the sale of renewable resources from State school lands set aside by the Enabling Act of 1889 into the Common School Account. If these sources are insufficient to meet needs, the Legislature can appropriate General Obligation Bond funds, or the Superintendent of Public Instruction can prioritize projects for funding. School districts may qualify for State School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) funds for specific capital projects based on a prioritization system. The District anticipates receiving$32 million in SCAP funding for the Evergreen High School and Tyee High School projects. Impact Fees: Impact fees are a means of supplementing traditional funding sources for the construction of public facilities needed to accommodate new development. See Section 7 School Impact Fees. -13- Other Funding: The District received funding toward school construction from the Port of Seattle/Federal Aviation Administration for Highline High School and Des Moines Elementary School replacement projects and will receive funding for the Pacific Middle School replacement project. The Six-Year Financing Plan shown in Table 8 demonstrates how the District intends to fund new construction capacity and improvements to school facilities for the years 2023-2028.The financing components include current and future planned bond funding, SCAP funds, and Port/FAA funds. Table 8 Capital Facilities Financing Plan (Costs in Millions) Bands/ 2 22 + + + t 2T y Total State Impact Paaject U-- _0-3 -9- �0_5 _0_b _Ll_, o=S Cast Local Funds Fees ParUF33 Funds Vanous Sites Building L Replacement 0.1 0.5 2.4 3 Virtual Ac ademy -New 2.5 0.5 3 Start Sylvester Field 1.9 1.9 Critical Needs Bond 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 21 2016&Bond 2022 Middle Schools Pacific Middle School 3.5 5.7 8.2 76.6 46 1.2 1412 =_ High Schools Evergreen High School 29.1 100 79.1 5 0.3 213.5 X k Tyee High School 21.8 99.2 66.4 2.3 189.7 -14- SECTION SEVEN: SCHOOL IMPACT FEES The GMA authorizes jurisdictions to collect impact fees to supplement funding of additional public facilities needed to accommodate new development. Impact fees cannot be used for the operation, maintenance, repair, alteration, or replacement of existing capital facilities used to meet existing service demands. To be eligible to collect school impact fees for new capacity projects, a district must demonstrate expected grade level enrollment growth over the six-year planning period and a related need for new capacity. As discussed in Section 4 above, after several years of increasing enrollment the District's recent enrollment has declined and current enrollment projections show no additional need for growth related projects over the six-year planning period. The District plans to monitor actual enrollment in future years and will include updated information in future updates to this CFP. When the District is eligible for impact fees to fund growth-related capacity needs, impact fees are calculated utilizing the formula in the King County Code. The resulting figures are based on the District's cost per dwelling unit to purchase land for school sites, make site improvements, construct schools, and purchase/install relocatable classrooms (portables). As required under the GMA, credits are applied in the formula to account for State Match Funds to be reimbursed to the District and projected future property taxes to be paid by the dwelling unit. When impact fees are calculated,the District's cost per dwelling unit is derived by multiplying the cost per student by the applicable student generation rate per dwelling unit.The student generation rate is the average number of students generated by each housing type; in this case, single family dwellings and multi-family dwellings. Where applicable,the District uses a student generation rate data based on actual permit data from local jurisdictions. See Appendix C. When fees are calculated, the District applies a 50% discount rate required by the King County School Impact Fee Ordinance to the fee calculated using the variables and formula described above. King County and the City of Kent currently have adopted school impact fee ordinances and collect school impact fees on behalf of the District when requested. The District has asked the other cities that it serves to consider adoption of a school impact fee ordinance. These requests are necessary as the District anticipates once again establishing eligibility to request school impact fees in the future. Table 9 School Impact Fees 2023 Housing Type Impact Fee Per Dwelling Unit Single Family N/A Multi-Family N/A -15- APPENDIX A DISTRICT ATTENDANCE BOUNDARY MAPS A-1 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ATTENDANCE BOUNDARIES (2023) iAlcftS' M 11}��M!Caxw� KAstipte �{s 14>i}TS !A1 pJ11Mi NI"Efl BEACH SW tO"{•S Y1'hlti± a15 dz N, aw� y, t i aTi3 faide, x . � Tukwila , S ! T E t^r^rt'Ks rV 1 1r#01 — rtr• 1 Seatto'fa�. a ,o, n Sn arnaTic?tt E .ti � �a:7NCE'HrtFa . A.rit:�rt M$'Lti'+riY �t "tt fA;,,"p ` Park arse �f k+Mt7arY .i -. i I �i*S hsm+'tti rReo-way _ E Wnutrsr! ca�ri�, Crst J .P: F N ♦..i Y.!eas, i'Aix:de .._ w Or'k,,. A-2 MIDDLE SCHOOL ATTENDANCE BOUNDARIES (2023) - A:!!tl•c'r7rr' - C2 YYA RIVER70H-SOUL EVA - PARK �J 4 z9 c Seattle-Tac a lntern84f00 . Airport — sywxxA� S bC k+ndMr - �h�° C1+navdts C'VjrYli;f�'KiY MdOHP,. Park 3"- [)es Mai rt*.'-. ! '... pot kc Purim Msa6e `�} SCf+oSii A-3 HIGH SCHOOL ATTENDANCE BOUNDARIES (2023) ,. Ral91Er,ftF'Ch ,.� Wts[r Crrvze.. E`y� RtNFRTQN- , -Sdti 1. Yd 1 t�asne scatae -. S Peek g awl Ftelds fu t rk vt,=ry n4 HIQMine Seal"a„ Bofan'rai Carc4arl > _ 1q 4'ork. tiWtitirt \ 7J etiw[a As Seattle`a � ���► Ir[ernatan SOUTHWiTER Airpo * Se wn a• .R ; 41, nr[age Dog Park Maury is:md Ayrriee F'at1; ��� A-4 Name of School Address Year built Beverly Park at Glendale ES 1201 S 104th St,Seattle,WA 98168 1963 Bow Lake ES 18237 42nd Ave S,Seattle,WA 98188 2007 Cedarhurst ES 11 S 132nd St,Burien,WA 98168 2008 Des Moines ES 23801 16th Ave S,Des Moines,WA 2020 98198 Gregory Heights ES 16201 16th Ave SW,Burien,WA 98166 2004 Hazel Valley ES 402 SW 132nd St,Burien,WA 98146 2004 Hilltop ES 12250 24th Ave S,Seattle,WA 98168 1957 0 _I_- Madrona ES 20301 32nd Ave S,SeaTac,WA 98198 2004 Marvista ES 19800 Marine View Dr SW,Normandy 2009 Park WA 98166 v McMicken Heights ES 3708 S 168th St,SeaTac,WA 98188 2011 E 22447 24th Ave S,Des Moines,WA w Midway ES 2008 98198 Mount View ES 10811 12th Ave SW,Seattle,WA 98146 2005 North Hill ES 19835 8th Ave S,Des Moines,WA 98148 2005 Parkside ES 2104 S 247th St,Des Moines,WA 98198 2010 Seahurst ES 14603 14th Ave SW,Burien,WA 98166 1992 Shorewood ES 2725 SW 116th St,Burien,WA 98146 2008 Southern Heights ES^ 11249 14th Ave S,Seattle,WA 98168 1955 White Center ES 10015 6th Ave SW,Seattle,WA 98146 2004 Cascade MS 11212 IOth Ave SW,Seattle,WA 98146 1957 Chinook MS 18650 42nd Ave S,Seatac,WA 98188 1956 0 s Glacier MS 2450 S 142nd St,Seatac,WA 98168 2020 V v Pacific MS 22705 24th Ave S,Des Moines,WA 1959 a 98198 Sylvester MS 16222 Sylvester Rd SW,Burien,WA 1953 98166 Big Picture MS 440 S 186th St,Burien,WA 98148 1960 Raisbeck Aviation HS 9229 E Marginal Way S,Tukwila,WA 2012 98108 Big Picture HS 440 S 186th St,Burien,WA 98148 1960 0 L Evergreen HS 830 SW 116th St,Seattle,WA 98146 1955 r Highline HS 225 S 152nd St,Burien,WA 98148 2021 on Mount Rainier HS 22450 19th Ave S,Des Moines,WA 2007 Tyee HS 4424 S 188th St,Seatac,WA 98188 1962 New Star/Salmon Creek 614 SW 120th St,Burien,WA 98146 1955 v Olympic Interim site 615 South 200th Street,Des Moines 1954/2019 Puget Sound High School 18010 8th Ave S,Burien,WA 98148 1972/2019 °c Valley View Early Learning 17622 46th Ave S,Seatac,WA 98188 1968 U Choice Academy 18367 8th Ave S,Des Moines,WA 98148 1958 A-5 APPENDIX B POPULATION AND ENROLLMENT DATA B-1 Highline Enrollment Projection Preferred Forecast AcW Oros ft [ded 6s Births 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Kfngcwty 25,190 25,057 24,514 24,630 25032 24,910 25,348 25,487 26,011 25,273 24,337 24,090 23,686 23,428 23,583 23,973 24428 24632 24899 25178 K End as% 6.72°% 6.46% 6.34% 6.16% 5.96% 5.85% 5,44% 4.88% 4.89% 5.03% 5.09% 5.17% 5.32% 5.37% 5,37% 5,40% 5.40% 5.40% 5.40% 5.40% 003 Oct14 Oct15 Oct16 Oct17 Oct18 OcH9 OCt20 Oct21 OcM 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 K 1694 1618 1553 1516 1492 1456 1378 1244 1271 1271 K 1240 1245 1260 1259 1267 1294 1318 1329 1344 1359 1 1564 1723 1643 1515 1518 1447 1478 1380 1250 1319 1 1288 1256 1237 1283 1288 1296 1317 1342 1354 1368 2 1491 1594 1683 1622 1506 1449 1429 1435 1309 1239 2 1304 1280 1248 1253 1300 1292 1301 1322 1347 1359 3 1429 1498 1580 1676 1583 1455 1419 1364 1405 1294 3 1232 1303 1278 1271 1276 1312 1303 1312 1334 1359 4 1385 1436 1490 1540 1630 1548 1389 1393 1331 1375 4 1275 1220 1291 1291 1294 1277 1312 1304 1312 1334 5 1319 1391 1369 1439 1464 1525 1501 1319 1288 1261 5 1325 1235 1181 1274 1275 1255 1248 1283 1275 1283 6 1420 1307 1262 1363 1390 1384 1409 1406 1205 1190 6 1184 1282 1195 1166 1257 1246 1227 1220 1254 1246 7 1241 1369 1271 1234 1289 1270 1331 1405 1359 1179 7 1185 1151 1247 1185 1155 1234 1223 1204 1198 1231 8 1319 1270 1377 1284 1253 1247 1285 1301 1367 1319 8 1165 1203 1168 1291 1227 1185 1266 1254 1235 1228 9 1665 1643 1604 1457 1337 1332 1384 1368 1438 1551 9 1467 1278 1320 1307 1444 1359 1312 1402 1389 1368 10 1456 1510 1510 1420 1445 1318 1309 1394 1361 1474 10 1581 1449 1262 1329 1316 1439 1355 1309 1398 1395 11 1408 1446 1356 1527 1375 1412 1361 1307 1408 1368 11 1496 1612 1478 1313 1382 1355 1482 1396 1348 1440 12 1506 1517 1360 1594 1501 1430 1516 1429 1484 1501 12 1483 1626 1761 1614 1434 1509 1510 1651 1555 1501 Total 18,897 19,322 19,058 19,187 18,783 18,273 18,189 17,745 17,476 17,341 Total 17,223 17,139 16,926 16,835 16,904 17,054 17,176 17,329 17,342 17,461 Chm 413 425 -254 129 404 -510 -84 -444 -269 -135 -118 -84 -213 -91 69 150 122 153 13 a %Chat' 22% 2.2% -1.4% 0.7% -21% -27% -0.5% -2.4% -1.514 -0.81h -0.7% -0,5% -12% 45% 14% 0.9% oN 02% 0.1% 0.71,V6 ToWs by Levd K-5 d882 910 9,318 9.308 9.193 8.0 8594 8,135 TN 7.759 7,664 7.0 7.496 7,632 7,R 7,726 7.0 7.893 7,965 8,062 6.8 3,980 3.946 3,910 3,881 3,932 $V 4,025 4.112 3,931 3688 3.533 3.636 3,610 3,641 3,639 3,%5 3,716 3,679 3.686 3,n5 912 6,035 6,116 5,830 5.998 5,62 5,492 5,570 5,49B 5,691 5.894 Q026 5,%5 5,821 5,562 5,95 5,663 5.659 5.758 5,690 5,695 Preferred Forecast Highline Comparison of RE and Headcount Enrollment from October October October Numbers RE as a Percent FTE Forecast HeadCount FTE of Headcount Avq Grade 0ct20 0ct21 Oct22 OC40 0ct21 Oct22 OcQQ 0cf21 Oct22 % 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 K 1244 1271 1271 1244.0 1270.2 1270.4 100.0% 99.9°% 100.0% 100,0% 1239.5 1244.7 1259,8 1257.9 1266.2 1293.3 1317.8 1328.8 1343.2 1358.3 1 1380 1250 1319 1380A 1250.0 1315.0 100.0% 100.0% 99.7°% 99,9% 1287.8 1254.6 1235.6 1282.0 1286.4 1294.9 1316,1 1341.0 1352.3 1366.9 2 1435 1309 1239 1435,0 1309.0 1251.5 100.0% 100.0% 101.0% 100.3% 1304.5 1284.2 1252.4 1257.6 1304.8 1296.6 1305.2 1326.6 1351.8 1363.1 3 1364 1405 1294 1363.1 1404.1 1286.4 99.9°% 99.9% 99.4°lit 99A 1231.5 1299.9 1275.3 1268.1 1273.4 1308.5 13003 1308.9 1330.4 1355,6 4 1393 1331 1375 1393.0 1330.1 1376.1 100.0% 99.9% 100.1% 100,0% 1275.5 1219.9 1290,7 12912 1283.9 1276.8 1312.0 1303.8 1312.5 1334.0 5 1319 1288 1261 1317.1 1287.1 12592 99.9% 99,9% 99.9% 99.9% 1324.8 1233.5 1179.7 1272.6 1273.1 1253.7 1246.8 1281.2 1273.2 1281.6 6 1406 1205 1190 1406.0 1203.2 1185.2 100.0% 99.9% 99.6% 99.8°% 1181.5 1279.9 1193,1 1163.4 1255.1 1243.5 1224.E 1217.8 1251.4 1243.6 7 1405 1359 1179 1404.3 1358.3 1177.7 100.0°% 99.9°% 99.9°% 99.9% 1185.1 1149,8 1245.7 1183.9 1154.5 1233.5 1222.1 1203.5 1196.9 1229.9 8 1301 1367 1319 1299.8 1365.5 1303.6 99.9% 99.9% 98.8% 99.5% 1162.3 1197.4 1163.1 1284.7 1221.1 1179.3 1260.0 1248.3 1229.4 1222.6 9 1368 1438 1551 1368.0 1437.0 1547.1 100.0% 99.9% 99.7% 99.8% 1469.2 1276.2 1317.5 1304.8 1441.3 1356.7 1310.3 1399.9 1381.0 1365.9 10 1394 1361 1474 1393.9 1356.6 1462.3 100.0% 99.7°% 99.2% 99.4% 1580.0 1440.9 1255.1 1321.2 1308.5 1431.5 1347.5 1301.3 1390.4 1377.5 11 1307 1408 1368 1223.2 1270.8 1217.1 93.6% 90.3% 89.0% 89.6°% 1339.8 1444.6 1324.3 1176.2 1238.0 1214.4 1328.5 1250.5 1207.7 1290.4 12 1429 1484 1501 1301.4 1300 1327.0 91.1% 87.9% 88.4% 88.2% 1303.6 14331 1552,6 1423.3 1264.1 1330.6 1331.0 1456.1 1370.6 13231 Total 17,745 17,476 17,341 17,529 17,147 16,978 98.8°% 98.1% 97.9% 98.3% 16885.1 16758.7 16544.8 16487,0 16570.4 16713.3 16822.2 16968.0 16996.7 11113,0 Change -381.9 .168.3 -93.36 -126.46 -213.87 -57.82 83.44 142,88 108.90 145.82 28,65 116.36 Pd -2.2% -1.0% -0.5% -0A -1.3% -03% 0.5% 0.9% 0.7% 0.9% 0.2% 0.7% 'Note:FTE Numbers include Satellite.Percentages for Satellite were based on this years October numbers. Numbers may not add to exact totals due to rounding B-2 APPENDIX C STUDENT GENERATION RATE DATA The District did not prepare updated student generation rate data for the 2023 Capital Facilities Plan as the District is not requesting the collection of school impact fees. Future CFP updates may include updated student generation rates to support impact fee calculations. C-1 Exhibit C - Kent School District CFP 4& KENT SCHOOL. DISTRICT EQUITY EXCELLENCE COMMUNITY Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 2022-2023 through 2028-2029 June 2023 Kent School District No. 415 12033 SE 256`h Street Kent, Washington 98030-6643 (253) 373-7526 BOARD of DIRECTORS Mr.Joe Bento, President Ms. Meghan Margel, Vice Director Ms. Leslie Hamada, Legislative Representative Mr. Awale Farah, Director Mr.Tim Clark, Director ADMINISTRATION Israel Vela Superintendent of Schools Dr. Wade Barringer, Associate Superintendent Strategic Initiatives & Operations Dave Bussard, Executive Director Operations & Facilities Sara Dumlao, Assistant Director of Business Services Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table of Contents I - Executive Summary ............................................................................................ 1 II -Six-Year Enrollment Projection......................................................................... 3 III - Current Kent School District"Standard of Service" ............................................ 7 Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students............................................... 7 Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students.................................... 8 IV- Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools........................................................9 V-Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan.......................................................... 14 VI - Portable Classrooms....................................................................................... 19 VII - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity........................................................... 20 VIII - Finance Plan................................................................................................. 26 IX —Summary of Changes to June 2022 Capital Facilities Plan.............................. 34 XAppendices..................................................................................................... 35 I - Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan has been prepared by the Kent School District as the organization's capital facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual Plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2023 for the 2023-2024 school year.This annual update of,the Plan reflects no new major capital projects. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all the district's needs. The district may prepare interim and periodic Long-Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, considering a longer or shorter period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the district as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, and Renton and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. This Plan has also been submitted to the cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac for their information and inclusion in their Comprehensive Plans. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee- implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Functional capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Portables in the interim capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. 1 The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District's standard of service and the existing inventory of permanent facilities. The District's program capacity of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the state's mandated reduction of class size to meet the standard of service for Kent School District. Portables provide additional interim capacity. Kent School District is the fifth largest (FTE basis) district in the state. Enrollment is electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction ("OSPI")on Form P-223.Although funding apportionment is based on Annual Average Full Time Equivalent (AAFTE), enrollment on October 1 is a widely recognized "snapshot in time" that is used to report the District's enrollment for the year as reported to OSPI. The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of interim facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the interim use of portables. This Plan currently represents projects in process funded primarily by the Kent School District's 2016 Bond, as well as the 2018 Capital Levy. Additional information about these projects can be found on the District's capital projects homepage (link . Additionally, project updates sent to our community of stakeholders can be accessed on the KSD website link . Based on revised student generation rates, our capacity and enrollment projections, the District will stay current with non-collection of student impact fee rate for the coming year. For a short overview, see Section IX (Summary of Changes to the June 2022 Capital Facilities Plan). 2 II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, enrollment growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years(See Table 2). For this Plan, the district relied substantially on the results from Dr. Les Kendrick's study of long-range enrollment forecasts for the Kent School District in the Winter of 2022. King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system (See Table 2). 7.49% of 24,337 King County live births in 2018 is projected for 1,824 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2023.This is a decrease of 937 live births in King County over the previous year. Early Childhood Education students (also identified as "ECE"), "Early Childhood Special Education ("ECSE") students are forecast and reported to OSPI separately on Form P-223H for Special Education Enrollment. Capacity is reserved to serve students in the ECE programs at elementary schools. In addition to live birth data, enrollment projections for October 1, 2023 going forward rely upon the results of the enrollment study by Dr. Kendrick, utilizing the "medium growth" methodology. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions will be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. The Kent School District serves eight permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County,the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, and Auburn and smaller portions of the cities of SeaTac, Black Diamond, and Maple Valley. 3 STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last ten years. Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary .248 Middle School .085 Senior High .107 Total .440 Multi-Family Elementary .130 Middle School .049 Senior High .056 Total .235 The student generation factor is based on 1,728 new SFD (Single Family Detached) units built between 2017 and 2021. The student generation factor is based on 1,526 new MF (Multi- Family) units built during the same period. The multi-family units consisted of 1,222 apartment units and 340 townhome units. The District sees an average of 44 students for every 100 single family units that are built and an average of 24 students for every 100 multi-family units that are built. The rate for apartment units is higher than for townhome units. The District sees an average of 29 students for every 100 apartment units. The student generation rate also varies among apartment developments, based on the number of bedrooms in the unit. Units with three plus bedrooms have much higher student generation rates than units that have two or fewer bedrooms. Noting these differences can help the District when planning for future growth from housing. In preparing the 2022-2023 to 2028-2029 Capital Facilities Plan the District contracted with Educational Data Solutions, LLC led by Dr. Les Kendricks, a noted expert in demographic studies for school districts, to analyze and prepare the student generation factor. Within the district's borders there are several income-based and multi-family housing projects coming on-line in 2022/2023. Once developed with occupancy occurring the District does recognize that the student generation for multi-family housing may impact future Capital Facilities Plan updates. One multi-family project worth noting, Covington Commons which appears to have many units with three-plus bedrooms and is likely to show better student growth than the medium project once completed. 4 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 OCTOBER REPORT 1251 H (HEADCOUNT) ENROLLMENT HISTORY For 2023 CFP - Headcount Enrollment History LB=Live Births LB in 2008 LB in 2009 LB in 2010 I LB in 2011 I LB in 2012 LB in 2013 LB in 2014 LB in 2015 I LB in 2016 LB in 2017 October HC Enrollment 2013 2014 2015 1 2016 1 2017 2018 2019 2020 1 2021 2022 King County Live Births' 25,222 25,057 24,514 24,630 25,032 24,910 25,348 25,487 26,011 25,274 Incr/(Derr) 323 (165) (543) 116 402 (122) 438 139 524 (737) Kindergarten/Birth%1 8.40% 8.34% 8.34% 8.17% 8.14% 7.98% 7.93% 6.68% 7.06% 7.42% Kindergarten 2,119 2,090 2,045 2,013 2,037 1,989 2,010 1,703 1,837 1,875 Grade 1 2,186 2,127 2,131 2,067 2,056 2,061 2,036 1,882 1,768 1,945 Grade 2 2,055 2,190 2,163 2,163 2,077 2,008 2,091 1,980 1,817 1,840 Grade 3 1,922 2,070 2,176 2,195 2,143 2,043 1,995 2,001 1,938 1,887 Grade 4 2,087 1,956 2,089 2,195 2,218 2,118 2,038 1,912 1,924 1,953 Grade 5 2,008 2,116 1,958 2,103 2,189 2,169 2,120 1,937 1,872 1,953 Grade 6 2,079 2,023 2,058 1,952 2,120 2,184 2,164 2,024 1,894 1,962 Grade 7 Middle School 2,046 2,104 1,974 2,021 1,922 2,044 2,166 2,010 1,925 1,906 Grade 8 " 112,121 2,091 2,100 2,021 2,043 1,882 2,073 2,086 1,937 1,956 Grade 9 Senior High 2,483 2,428 2,093 2,105 2,006 2,004 1,888 2,006 2,043 2,011 Grade 10 " 2,046 2,151 2,165 2,099 2,080 1,946 2,035 1,813 1,959 2,050 Grade 11 " 1,873 1,802 1,818 1,865 1,823 1,732 1,663 1,744 1,583 1,677 Grade 12 1,539 1,576 1,742 1,730 1,810 1,654 1,634 1,484 1,656 1,467 Total Enrollment z 26,564 26,724 26,512 26,529 26,524 25,834 25,913 24,582 24,153 24,482 Yearly Headcount (48) 160 (212) 17 (5) (690) 79 (1,331) (429) 329 Incr/(Decr) Cumulative Incr/(Decr) (267) (107) (319) (302) (307) (997) (918) (2,249) (2,678) (2,349) Change to Full Day Kindergarten for all schools 1 This number indicates actual births in King County 5 years prior to enrollment year as updated by Washington State Department of Health,Center for Health Statistics.Kent School District percentage based on actual Kindergarten enrollment 5 years later. z Enrollment reported to OSPI on Form P-223 generates basic education funding and excludes Early Childhood Special Education ("ECSE"&"62"or Birth to 2 Preschool Inclusive Education)and excludes College-only Running Start students. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 1 May 2023 5 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX-YEAR ENROLLMENT PROJECTION 2022 - 2028 Enrollment Projections Full Day Kindergarten at all Elem LB in 2017 LB in 2018 LB in 2019 1 LB in 2020 1 LB in 2021 Est LB in 2022 Est.LB in 2023 ACTUAL PROJECTED ENROLLMENT ENROLLMENT October 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 King County Live Births 25,274 24,337 24,090 23,686 23,428 23,583 23,973 Incr/(Decr) (213) (937) (247) (404) (258) 155 390 Kindergarten/Birth % 7.42% 7.49% 7.53% 7.60% 7.60% 7.75% 7.75% FD Kindergarten 1,875 1,824 1,814 1,801 1,781 1,827 1,858 Grade 1 1,945 1,937 1,893 1,902 1,888 1,849 1,897 Grade 2 1,840 1,967 1,960 1,945 1,954 1,930 1,890 Grade 3 1,887 1,871 2,003 2,016 2,000 2,009 1,985 Grade 4 1,953 1,874 1,861 2,012 2,025 2,009 2,018 Grade 5 1,953 1,964 1,887 1,893 2,047 2,060 2,044 Grade 6 1,962 1,995 2,008 1,949 1,955 2,114 21128 Grade 7 Middie School 1,906 1,939 1,975 2,007 1,948 1,954 2,113 Grade 8 " 1,956 1,903 1,936 1,991 2,024 1,964 1,970 Grade 9 Senior High 2,011 1,993 1,941 1,995 2,051 2,085 2,024 Grade 10 " 2,050 2,009 1,991 1,959 2,013 2,070 2,104 Grade 11 " 1,677 1,798 1,763 1,765 1,736 1,784 1,834 Grade 12 " 1,467 1,585 i 1,691 1,675 1,677 1,649 1,695 Total Enrollment Projection 24,482 1 24,659 1 24,723 1 24,910 1 25,099 25,304 25,560 Yearly Incr/(Decr) (100) 177 64 187 189 205 256 Yearly Incr/(Decr)% 0.41% 0.72% 0.26% 0.76% 0.76% 0.82% 1.01% Total Enrollment Projection* 24,482 24,659 24,723 24,910 25,099 25,304 25,560 *Does not include iGrad,RS Live births for King County are estimates for year 2022&2023 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study Dec'22 ("Medium Growth Model") Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 May 2023 6 III - Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County Code 21A.06.1225 references a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity.The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the District which would best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as "impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower-class size at those facilities. Portables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. The standard of service defined herein will continue to evolve in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service. This process will affect various aspects of the District's standard of service and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students • Class size ratio for grades K- 3 is planned for an average of 23 students per class, not to exceed 26. • Class size ratio for grades 4- 6 is planned for an average of 27 students per class, not to exceed 29. Some special programs require specialized classroom space and the program capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in special programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs. Students may also be provided with music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Some identified students will also be provided educational opportunities in classrooms for special programs such as those designated as follows: Multilingual Learner Education (MLE) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title 1)—Federal Program Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) —State Program 7 Highly Capable Students—State Program Reading, math or science Labs Dual Language Programs in four elementary schools and one middle school Inclusive Education Service for Elementary and Secondary students with disabilities may be provided in a separate or self-contained classroom sometimes with a capacity of 10-15 students, depending on the program. Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings per the negotiated collective bargaining agreement with KEA. • The average class size ratio for grades 7-8 is 30 students per class and 143 students per day,with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 150 based on five class periods per day. • The average class size ratio for grades 9-12 is 32 students per class and 153 students per day,with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 160 based on five class periods per day. Like Inclusive Education Programs listed above, many other secondary programs require specialized classroom space which can reduce the functional capacity of the permanent school buildings, such as technology labs, performing arts activities, a variety of career and technical education programs, and other specialized programs. Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs,the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a workspace during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the Kent School District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 95%for secondary schools. Functional capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level. 8 IV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent functional capacity to house 33,847 students and interim (portable) capacity to house 4,161. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section III. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity (See Table 3). The ratio between permanent capacity and portable capacity is 87.8%- 12.2%. The functional capacity is periodically updated for changes in the programs, additional classrooms, and new schools. Functional capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes implemented in the Fall of 2022. Calculation of Elementary, Middle School and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B, and C. Maps of existing schools are included. For clarification, the following is a brief description of some of the non-traditional programs for students in Kent School District: iGrad - Kent School District has developed the Individualized Graduation and Degree Program or "iGrad". iGrad is an Open Door (Drop-out Reengagement) School that offers a second plus chance to students aged 16-21 who have dropped out of high school or are at risk of not earning a high school diploma by age 21. iGrad is not included in this Capital Facilities Plan, because it is served as a leased space at the Kent Hill Plaza Shopping Center. Over the past three years, enrollment in the iGrad program has averaged over 250 students. Kent Virtual Academy - The Kent Virtual Academy is open to grades 6-12 and is currently serving 171 students. The virtual school offers a flexible learning experience designed to engage students when and where they work best. Each school day will include a combination of live(synchronous)virtual instruction and on-demand (asynchronous) learning opportunities outside of a traditional bell schedule. Students can attend live virtual lessons with their teachers and classmates, participate in live virtual class or small group discussions, check-in or meet with teachers, watch recorded video lessons, work independently on projects and lessons, participate in learning experiences outside the school setting for credit or to meet competencies.Virtual school students may also attend their boundary school for select classes and services. 9 2022-2023 SCHOOL Year ABR ADDRESS Functional Capacity Opened Carriage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235-140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 550 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042 576 Covington Elementary 2018 CO 25811 156th Avenue SE,Covington 98042 620 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225-180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 504 East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 626 Emerald Park 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 602 Fairwood Elementary 1969 FW 16600-148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 490 George T.Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 446 Glenridge Elementary 1996 GR 19405-120th Avenue SE,Renton 98058 602 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700-191st Place SE, Kent 98042 564 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641-144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 578 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915-186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 596 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700-64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 550 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660-142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 658 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 580 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710-108th Avenue SE,Kent 98030 522 Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621-140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 608 Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98030 580 Neely-O'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 522 Panther Lake Elementary 2009 PL 12022 SE 216th Street,Kent, 98031 546 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 642 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825-118th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 648 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030-162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 578 River Ridge Elementary 2021 RR 00000-22420 Military Rd S SeaTac,WA 858 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135-228th Ave SE,Black Diamond 98010 554 Scenic Hill Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030 600 Soos Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 508 Springbrook Elementary 1969 SB 20035-100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 564 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300-132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 578 Elementary TOTAL 16,850 Cedar Heights Middle School 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 Street,Covington 98042 1,112 Mattson Middle School 1981 MA 16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042 922 Meeker Middle School 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 1,154 Meridian Middle School 1958 MM 23480-120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 884 Mill Creek Middle School 2005 MC 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 1,058 Northwood Middle School 1996 NW 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 1,090 Canyon Ridge Middle School 1966 CR 11000 SE 264th Street,Kent 98030 0 Middle School TOTAL 6,220 Kent-Meridian High School 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98030 2,211 Kentlake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street,Kent 98042 2,516 Kentridge Senior High School 1968 KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 2,940 Kentwood Senior High School 1981 KW 25800-164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 2,608 Senior High TOTAL 10,275 Kent Laboratory Academy 2021 KA 00000-208th St Kent,WA 98030 502 Kent Virtual Academy KVA No hard Building i-Grad Program IG Not a KSD Building DISTRICT TOTAL 33,847 10 Kent School District 2022/ 23 School Year High School Boundaries Tukwila i SeaTac Kentridge ,High School Maple Valley Kent Kent-Meridian High School Kentwood • High School• ngton Kentlake High School • Lea Hill Auburn 0 2 4 8 Miles I L I I I I I I I I King County,WA State Parks GIS,Esri,HERE,Garmin,SafeGraph,METI/NASA, USGS,Bureau of Land Management, EPA,NPS,USDA Legend ® High School F-7 Kentridge High Buildings School Kent-Meridian Kentwood High High School School 0 Kentlake High School 11 Kent School District 2022/ 23 School Year Middle School Boundaries Tukwila N Northwood Middle SeaTac School • Meeker Middle School • Mill Creek Maple Middle Meridian Mattson Valley School Middle Middle • School School • Kent • ngton Cedar Heights Middle School • Lea Hilt Z Auburn 2 4 8 Miles King County,WA State Parks GIS,Esri,HERE,Ga min SafeGraph, METI/NASA, I I I I I I USGS,Bureau of Land Management, EPA,NPS,USDA Legend Cedar Heights Meeker Middle 7-7 Mill Creek Middle School School Middle School 0 Mattson Middle Meridian Northwood School Middle School Middle School • Middle Schools 12 Kent School District 2022/ 23 School Year Elementary School Boundaries Tukwila Fairwood Elementary N Ridgewood Carriage •Elementar Crest • SeaTac Elementary Springbrook Glenr!dge • Elementary Elementary • E eral Park I me tary Lake Youngs Panthertak • Elementary River Ridge Elementary Soos Cre k Elementary lement • Sunrise a k i d Elementar Maple eely O Bri n EI mentar Valle Elementar ast Hill y Elementa y • arm Sortun • Kent Daniel, Elementary Crestwood Kent Elementary Meridian Elementar Elementary Scenic Hill Elementary Elementary Ceda Iley • Millenni m Covington Elementa Elementary J insCr k�lem ntary eadow Ri Element�r g� Covingt lementar Horizon • *Pine Tree Elementary Elementa y Grass Lake Elementary Lea Hill Sawyer Woods Elementary • i Auburn 2 4 8 MIIeS King County,WA State Parks GIS,Esri,HERE,Ga min SafeGraph METI/NASA, i i i I i i I USGS,Bureau of Land Management, EPA,NPS,USDA Legend Carriage Crest East Hill 0 Horizon L�Meadow Ridge Park Orchard Scenic Hill Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary 0 Cedar Valley Emerald Park 0 Jenkins Creek Meridian Pine Tree Soos Creek Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Covington 0 Fairwood Kent 0 Millennium !�Ridgewood Springbrook Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Crestwood Glenridge 0 Lake Youngs 1�Neely 0 Brien 0 River Ridge Sunrise Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Daniel 0 Grass Lake 0 Martin Sortun O Panther Lake Sawyer Woods ® Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Schools 13 V - Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan In November 2016, the voters of the Kent School District approved a bond measure for $252 million. This bonding authority provided for the replacement of Covington Elementary school,which opened in August of 2018, the new River Ridge Elementary school, and our new Kent Laboratory Academy, which both opened in August 2021. As a critical component of capital facilities planning, county and city planners and decision- makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments.This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety to and from school and bus stops as well as bus pull-outs and turn- arounds. Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified bythe District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future (See Table 4&Sitemap). Voter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is secured for the purchase of additional sites, but some may be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements, and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. The Board will continue an annual review of standards of service and those decisions will be reflected in each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. Our District went out for a Bond Measure in April of 2023 and did not receive enough votes for approval. We are currently re-evaluating district needs and looking at next steps that align with the Strategic Plan which continues to make a priority to revitalize, rejuvenate and rebuild our aging schools as well as begin a process to remove interim classroom portables and find room or create permanent structures to reduce and eventually eliminate the more than 166 portable classrooms in our district. We will continue to determine capacity versus enrollment as well as programs to ensure this goal to reduce and or eliminate all portables in our district is obtained in the next several years. As a part of the planning process, the District has been tracking a few major development projects which have affected enrollment and will continue to increase students'forecasts. On Meeker Street in Kent we have seen several major apartment complexes, ETHOS and Midtown 64 Apartments. These continue to have an impact on enrollment as they fill up their newly built facilities. Alexian Gateway Project is located on the corner of Military Road and Veterans Drive in Kent and will begin occupying its 283 planned units in 2023-2024. In Covington,we are tracking a multi-family house development which has been approved and construction has begun. The 1700-unit Lakepointe Urban Community will fall within our 14 enrollment boundary and proposed completion of Phase 4 is shown to be 2027. Construction in the Kent School District boundaries have been steadily rising over the last four years and planned communities are now being recognized through the planning teams in multiple city and county jurisdictions we serve. 15 <<< KATERRA -- _. ------ 7 wi ,TCR i J n ' 1� Tv \ J rzo J GATEWAY (APARTMENTS .� 4Z / LEGEND ONE BEDROOM UNITS TWO BEDROOM UNITS THREE BEDROOM UNITS -- -- TVPEA UNITS IInCS,ET NO GARAGE ONIV BUILDINLDIN G BIGNAGE UNITNUMBERING( 111 - 1.UNITNUMBERSREADT0P TO ADDRESSING BOTTOM(FLOOR 14)AS SHEET(1,2.3) / ®UNff NUMBERING PLAN INDICATED ON THE UNIT STACK :G.00.014 1 i Phasing Legpend NOTE: a D I I THE LOCATION OF DEVELOPMENT.INCLUDiNGS ROADWAYS AND ® TRAILS.15 N.THE XIOIATE AND DOES NOT VEST TO WILL SPECIFIC Phase IA-Maple Hills Division 5 LOCATION.THE LOCATION OF ALL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE BASED Preliminary Plat approval in third Q rtcr 2021.Construction and Final ON MSTING CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION AND THE Plat Recording 2022. TERMS OF THE PLANNED ACTION.THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. AND APPLICABLE LOCAL.STATE.AND FEDERAL LAWS. Phase I B-Approximate Years 2019-2024 Establishment of final grade,construction of Covington Conxctor to Southeast boundary,construction of fire phase of commercial development. Phase 2-Approximate Years 2020-2025 Establishment of anal lake perimeter.conatraction of 191 A Place SE extension and associated R-12 residential development,construction of s=nd phase of commercial development on peninsula. Phase 3-Approximate Years 2023-2028 Construction of third phase of commercial development. Phase 4-Approximate Years 2020 2027 Phase 3 �Completon ofg—I pit reclamation.comtrui:ton of NR and R 12—dental development Fri! Phase I B s s 110 Phase 4 "s Phase 2 O 13 o = Lalkepointe Urban Village Phasing Map _. OA K PO I NT E n January 30,201�7 Updated September 15,2021 Legend NOTE: Mccum o<wre R�Idrncal lRrl ' Facal Poml/R+Nk crlxd°g spot THE LOCATION OF DEVELOPMENT,INCLUDINGS ROADWAYS AND tu¢b D.,,.InIa�ouN IR-I/1 * ,x uemcm TRAILS,IS APPROXIMATE AND DOES NOT VEST TO THIER SPECIFIC LOCATION.THE LOCATION OF ALL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE BASED ® Mucd Rcvdrn°al IMRI li°pued Park anJ WJc Eadlliv ON EXISTING CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION AND THE Mu.W Uscl Commvtlal IRCMUI © iranm sop TERMS OF THE PLANNED ACTION.THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. AND APPLICABLE LOCAL.STATE,AND FEDERAL LAWS. ® ,M�of MWu-fairvlYand C.nmvdal6 6666668 N,,,—d Tr.kand Buv Rniu°fbu¢ Gcavy¢ed,Adun fknimula Nea P°Nic SrtOs 5wp Ught Cemrai xcd r we db mk<'Rwnc wawaa ® wcrUnd WtTcr �� Irnkm Crcck ._ O Pcdatnan/WIJI'Ic Underarming ,� Publklv AncC.iblc Prls and flag IandKai+e Mc¢ ,... ® C'aWil+cd lGradcJl Op°a Spa. U°dhwrbcd Oprn space _ �� C ,¢wn l4gM1landz imil •- .- r�n,rorzn�Trblc.,w�loa� _. .,� —`�- f _ — I � u J • r 1 L COMBINED OPEN SPACE—11 ,.. ZONE GROSS PARKS OPEN SPACE* PLND TOTAL NETACRES** \ _ z ACREAGE UNENITIES RCMU 34,00 AC 2NI 1C A 2a %CC JR 031C 3}00.1C 5.]fi 1C 053 1 \ 25.3J 1C R-6 $35 AC 055AC 6.SA O.L 1 .23.4t 5. 1C R-12 353}AC 153 AC 141]AC 7,6 AC 2337AC 11.98 l i T it TCTAL 2I}.IOAC I0.6]AC 1 64,36 AC IR.51M: 1 93.5511 1_0.55.1C ". v •.: L�.. t *OPEN SPACE INCLUDES CSS AC AREAS.RUSI OIANDOTI IERL Rf N.I'A.;ES *NEi ACRES EQUALS GROSS ACRFAGEMIrvU>tOtAL AMENITIES w Lakepointe Urban Village Master Develo p ment Plan N ° � �5 -y)Af(P01 N-1-L. le January 30.2017 Updated September 15.202I VI - Portable Classrooms The Plan references use of portables as interim capacity for facilities. Currently,the District utilizes portables to house students more than functional capacity and for program purposes at some school locations (Please see Appendices A, B,Q. Based on enrollment projections, implementation of full day kindergarten programs, lower state mandated class sizes, functional capacity, and no need for additional interim capacity, the District anticipates no need to purchase or lease additional portables during the next six- year period to ensure capacity requirement(Noted in section V.Six Yr. Planning Construction). During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District's portables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the portables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these portables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables may be used as interim facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the times of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Portables currently in the District's inventory are continually evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced or when possible, be removed due to life expectancy. The Districts goal is to reduce and or eliminate all portables so we may provide an equitable learning environment for all. The Plan projects that the District will use portables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of portables,their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between portables, emerging technologies, and educational restructuring will continue to be examined. 19 VII - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section IV, the functional capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size requirements, class size fluctuations etc. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3, the functional capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts (See Tables 5& 5a-b-c). Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment "snapshot in time" to report enrollment for the year. Kent School District continues to be the fifth largest district (both FTE and headcount basis) in the state of Washington. The P-223 Headcount for October 2022 was 24,482 with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECSE and college-only Running Start students. In October 2022, there were an additional 877 students in 11th and 12th grade participating in the Running Start program at different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. Of these students, 486 attended classes only at the college ("college-only") and are excluded from FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District has one of the highest Running Start program participation rates in the state. Based on the enrollment forecasts, permanent facility inventory and capacity, current standard of service, portable capacity, and future additional classroom space, the District plans to continue to satisfy required capacity through the interim use of portables (See Table 5 and Tables 5 a-b-c). While the district currently shows available capacity to address projected need on a purely statistical basis, there are variety of extenuating factors that need to be considered. The Kent School District currently makes significant use of portables, which we do not consider as part of our permanent standard of service. We have included portable space in our interim capacity figures, and we do not count that as a permanent space solution. Kent is unusual in that it incorporates neighborhoods intersecting with at least 6 municipalities, including Kent, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, Renton, and SeaTac. The district covers 73 square miles and includes over 40 schools. Within this large geographic area, we expect to have pockets of localized capacity need that are not necessarily reflected in the aggregate figures. As one example,the Lakepointe Urban Village development in Covington may require new classroom capacity even as space may exist in schools on the far other end of the district's boundaries. 20 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT SCHOOL YEAR PACtUal022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 P R O J E C T E D Permanent Functional Capacity t 33,847 I 34,529 I 34,529 I 34,529 I 34,529 I 34,529 I 34,529 Changes to Permanent Capacity ' Capacity Increase(F) Additional Permanent Classrooms 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 33,847 34,529 34,529 34,529 34,529 34,529 34,529 Interim Portable Capacity Elementary Portable Capacity Required 31240 3,192 3,192 3,192 3,192 3,192 3,192 Middle School Portable Capacity Required 336 308 308 308 308 308 308 Senior High School Portable Capacity Required 654 540 540 540 540 540 540 Interim Portable Capacity Totall 4,230 4,040 4,040 4,040 4,040 4,040 4,040 TOTAL CAPACITY t 38,077 38,569 38,569 38,569 38,569 38,569 38,569 TOTAL ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 2 24,482 24,659 24,723 24,910 25,099 25,304 25,560 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 13,595 13,910 13,846 13,659 13,470 13,265 13,009 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Projection Source:Les Kendrick Demographic Study,2022("Medium Growth Model") Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 May 2023 21 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS: Grades 9 - 12 SCHOOL YEAR 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 1 2025-26 1 2026-27 1 2027-28 2028-29 Actual P R O J E C T E D Senior High Permanent Capacity' 10,275 I 10,097 I 10,097 I 10,097 I 10,097 I 10,097 I 10,097 I Changes to High School Capacity 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 Subtotal 10,275 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 Portables Interim Capacity 1 654 I 540 I 540 I 540 I 540 I 540 I 540 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 10,929 10,637 10,637 10,637 10,637 10,637 10,637 ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 3 7,205 7,385 7,386 7,394 7,477 7,588 7,657 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 3,724 3,252 3,251 3,243 3,160 3,049 2,980 No Classroom Portables required at this time.Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 3 Projection Source:Les Kendrick Demographic Study,2022("Medium Growth Model") Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C May 2023 22 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY MIDDLE SCHOOL: Grades 7 - 8 2022-23 "Middle School: Grades 6-8 2023-24 and Beyond" 7-8 Middle School Grade 6-8 SCHOOL YEAR 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 1 2026-27 1 2027-28 2028-29 Actual P R O J E C T E D G r a d Middle School Permanent Capacity' 6,220 e 7,216 I 7,216 I 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 6 / 8 2 0 Changes to Middle School Capacity7:] 0 2 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 0 0 3 Subtotal 6,220 2 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 4 a n Portable Interim Capacity 1 336 d 308 I 308 I 308 I 308 I 308 308 b TOTAL CAPACITY s 6,556 a 7,524 7,524 7,524 7,524 7,524 7,524 y 0 ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION z 3,862 d 5,837 5,919 1 5,947 5,927 6,032 6,211 SURPLUS(DEFICIT)CAPACITY 2,694 1,687 1,605 1,577 1,597 1,492 1,313 No Classroom Portables required at middle schools at this time.Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Projection Source:Les Kendrick Demographic Study,2022("Medium Growth Model") Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B May 2023 23 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY: Grades K - 6 Thru 2022-23 **ELEMENTARY. Grades K- 5 2023-24 and Beyond** K-6 Elementary Grade K-5 SCHOOL YEAR 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 1 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Actual P R O J E C T E D G r a d Elementary Permanent Capacity' 16,850 e 16,696 I 16,696 I 16,696 I 16,696 I 16,696 I 16,696 K 5 Additional Permanent Classrooms 2 0 0 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 2 Subtotal 16,850 3 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 2 4 Interim Portable Capacity 3;240 a 3,192 I 3,192 I 3,192 I 3,192 I 3,192 I 3,192 d TOTAL CAPACITY 112 20,090 b 19,888 19,888 19,888 19,888 19,888 19,888 e y 0 ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION s 13,415 n 11,437 11,418 11,569 11,695 11,684 11,692 d SURPLUS(DEFICIT)CAPACITY 6,675 8,451 8,470 8,319 8,193 8,204 8,196 Enrollment&Projections reflect FULL Day Kindergarten at ALL Elementary schools @ 1.0&exclude ECSE Preschoolers. 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Additional classrooms will be placed at schools with the greatest need for aleve overcrowding 3 Projection Source:Les Kendrick Demographic Study,2022 l"Medium Growth Model") Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A May 2023 24 Vill - Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2022-2023 through 2028-2029.The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees.The plan is based on future bond issues,state school construction assistance, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. In November 2016, the District held a special election to approve the authorization of $252,000,000 in bonding authority. The projects described below are part of this authorization. The first series of bonds ($80 million) were issued in February 2017, which funded the Covington Elementary Replacement School, as well as other infrastructure projects. Impact fees were used at both River Ridge Elementary School and Kent Laboratory Academy projects due to escalation in construction pricing across the Pacific Northwest. According to RCW 82.02.090, the definition of an impact fee is ". . . a payment of money imposed upon development as a condition of development approval to pay for public facilities needed to serve new growth and development, and that is reasonably related to the new development that creates additional demand and need for public facilities, that is a proportionate share of the cost of the public facilities, and that is used for facilities that reasonably benefit the new development. Impact fee' does not include a reasonable permit or application fee." Mitigation or impact fees can be calculated on the basis of "unhoused student need" or "the maintenance of a district's level of service" as related to new residential development. A mitigation/impact fee may be imposed based upon a determination of insufficient existing permanent and/or interim portable school space or to pay for permanent and/or newly acquired interim portable school space previously constructed as a result of growth in the district. A district's School Board must first approve the application of the mitigation or impact fees and, in turn,approval must then be granted by the other general government jurisdictions having responsibility within the district, counties, cities and towns. (Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, SeaTac, and Unincorporated King County) Though the current enrollment projections increase for both elementary and secondary schools are relatively flat, the ongoing need to provide permanent instructional facilities to house students is a driving need as the shifts in our family populations continue, due to ongoing development. Previously collected Impact fees may be used to support and address the challenges related to the number of interim instructional facilities currently in use, the replacement of some of these aged facilities,the maintenance of the district's level of services, and the potential expansions to existing facilities in future years. The Kent School District 2022-2023 CFP update includes continued execution of the 2016 Capital Bond Projects, the 2018 Levy Projects, and the data collection and review of our Facility Assessment Reports.The District Facilities and Capital Planning Teams have come together and joined the Capital 25 Bond Planning Task Force (CBPTF) which included District personnel, design professionals, teaching staff, student voices, as well as community members who collaborated and discussed district needs. Our initial plan revealed priorities including school replacement due to age, and the need for added permanent facilities to (1) reduce and eliminate our need for portables and (2) accommodate future growth as housing in the Kent region continues to expand. We started with a list of 2 billion in needs and through itemizing and prioritizing, we brought the list of essential projects to 495 million.This list was brought before the District's Board of Directors for comments, discussion, and approval. A Capital Bond Measure followed and went out to vote in April 2023 and did not pass with voter approval. We are now re-evaluating needs and figuring out next steps. Future updates to this Capital Facilities Plan will include details of any adopted planning. With the opening of Canyon Ridge Middle School, our sixth grade moving from elementary to middle school, and our boundary change, we are advancing opportunities to even out capacity at each site to accommodate our programs and student-based needs. For the Six-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Capital Planning Team. Please see pages 13-14 for a summary of the cost basis. Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction estimated costs are based on the last elementary school built in Kent, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost future elementary school, as well as average pricing of nearby school districts recently built new middle and new high school projects. Project Projected Cost New Elementary School $68,000,000 New Middle School $155,000,000 New High School $220,000,000 Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. District Adjustment The impact fee calculations on Appendix B & C result in a zero-dollar impact fee total for this year but may be adjusted if needed per RCW 36.70A.130(2)(b) provision. 26 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN Secured Unsecured Impact SCHOOL FACILITIES 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 TOTAL Local&State State 2 or Local a Fees 5 Estimated Estimated PERMANENT FACILITIES No School Projects at this time. 80 TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional portables 3-4 $0 OTHER NIA Totals $o so $o so so $0 so I so $0 $o so " F=Funded U= Unfunded NOTES: 2 The District anticipates receiving some State Funding Construction Assistance for some projects. 3 Facility needs are pending review.Some of these projects may be funded with impact fees. 4 Cost of portables based on current cost and adjusted for inflation for future years. s Fees in this column are based on amount of fees collected to date and estimated fees on future units. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 6 May 2023 27 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 Site Acquisitions & Costs Average of Sites Purchased,Sold or Built on within last 10 Years Year Open 1 Type& Purchased #on Map School/Slte Sold Location Acreage Cost/Price I Avg cost-pnce/acre Total Average Cast/Acre Elementary No Acquisitions for Elemenary Schools 0.00 $0 Elementary Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 Elem site average Middle School No Acquisitions for Middle Schools 0.00 $0 Middle School Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $� Mitltlle Schl Site Avg. Senior High No Acquisitions for Senior Highs 0.00 $0 $0 Senior High Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 Sr Hi Site Avera e Note:All Kral sties were purchased prior to adoption of Urban Growth Area. Numbers correspond to locations on Site Bank&Acquisitions Map on Page 35. Properties purchased prior to 2010 11 Urban Site-Covington area North(So of Mattson MS) 1984 2/Rural Site-Ham Lake east(Pollard) 1992 Total Acreage&Cost Total Average Cost/Acre 4/Urban Site-Shady Lake(Sowers-Blaine-Drahota-Paroline) 1995 5/Rural Site-SE of Lake Morton area (West property) 1993 91 Rural Site-McMillan Assemblage(South of MC) 98-04 10/Urban Site-Yeh-Williams(W of 132 Ave SE at SE 288) 1999 12/Urban Site-SE 256th Covington(Halleson) 2000 12./Urban Site-156th Ave.SE Covington(Wilottrom) 2004 12b/Urban Site-SE 256th St.Covington(West of CO) 2004 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 7 May 2022 28 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors -Single Family Student Generation Factors-Multi-Family Elementary (Grades K-6) 0.248 Elementary 0.130 Middle School (Grades 7-8) 0.085 Middle School 0.049 Senior High (Grades 9- 12) 0.107 Senior High 0.056 Total 0.440 Total 0.235 Projected Increased Student Capacity OSPI -Square Footage per Student,see side char Elementary 0 Elementary 115 Middle School 850 Middle School 148 Senior High (Academy) 0 Senior High 173 Special Education ?? Required Site Acreage per Facility Elementary (required) 12 Average Site Cost/Acre Middle School (required) 25 Elementary $161,678 Senior High (required) 40 Middle School $0 Senior High $0 New Facility Construction Cost Elementary $68,000,000 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost Middle School $155,000,000 Elementary @ 24 $315,000 Senior High $220,000,000 Middle School @ 29 $315,000 Senior High @ 31 $315,000 Temporary Facility Square Footage State Funding Assistance Credit Elementary 123,702 District Funding Assistance Percentage 51.86% Middle School 10,256 Senior High 21,296 Total 4.4% 155,254 Construction Cost Allocation CCA-Cost/Sq,Ft. $246.83 Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary 1,567,594 Middle School 760,483 District Average Assessed Value Senior High/Other 1,077,315 Single Family Residence $653,485 Total 95.6% 3,405,392 Total Facilities Square Footage District Average Assessed Value Elementary 1,691,296 Multi-Family Residence $220,293 Middle School 770,739 Senior High/Other 1,098,611 Total 3,560,646 Bond Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 $1.02 Current Rate /1,000 Tax Rate 0.0010 Developer Provided Sites/Facilities Value 0 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Dwelling Units 0 Current Bond Interest Rate 3.58% CPI Inflation Factor 5.20% Budget Preparations I OSPI (www.kl2.wa.us) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX A) May 2023 29 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Capacity)x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre I Facility Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary) 12 $161,678 0 0.248 A 2 (Middle School) 25 $0 850 0.085 $0.00 A 3 (Senior High) 40 $0 0 0.107 Total 77 $161,678 850 0.440 A $0.00 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary) $68,000,000 0 0.248 0.903 B 2 (Middle School) $155,000,000 850 0.085 0.984 $15,252.00 B 3 (Senior High) $220,000,000 0 0.107 0.998 Total $443,000,000 850 0.440 B $15,252.00 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence(Portables) Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Temporary/Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $315,000 24 0.248 0.097 $315.74 C 2 (Middle School) $315,000 29 0.085 0.016 $14.77 C 3 (Senior High) $315,000 31 0.107 0.020 $21.75 Total $945,000 84 0.440 C $352.25 State Funding Assistance Credit per Single Family Residence (formerly"State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance% x Student Factor Construction Cost Allocation SPI Sq.Ft./Student Assistance% Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $246.83 115 0.5186 0.248 $3,650.73 D 2 (Middle School) $246.83 148 0.5186 0.085 $1,610.32 D 3 (Senior High) $246.83 173 0.5186 0.107 $2,369.52 D $7,630.57 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value(AAV) $653,485 Net Present Value(per EQ)(NPV) 8.77 Current Debt Service Rate/1,000 ( r) 0.10% TC -0 $5,848.83 (Below used to calculate NPV) Current Bond Interest Rate 3.58% Years Amortized (10 Years)-Used in NPV Calculation 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility/Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC 4 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $0.00 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $15,252.00 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $352.25 Subtotal $15,604.25 D = State Match Credit per Residence $7,630.57 TC=Tax Credit per Residence $5,848.83 Subtotal $13,479.40 Total Unfunded Need $2,124.85 50%Developer Fee Obligation $1,062 FC=Facility Credit(if applicable) $0 District Adjustment ($1,062) Net Fee Obligation per Residence-Single Family ($0.00) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX B) May 2023 30 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Capacity)x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre I Facility Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary) 12 $161,678 0 0.13 A 2 (Middle School) 25 $0 850 0.049 $0.00 A 3 (Senior High) 40 $0 0 0.056 Total 77 $161,678 850 0.235 A b $0.00 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary) $68,000,000 0 0.13 0.903 B 2 (Middle School) $155,000,000 850 0.049 0.984 $8,792.33 B 3 (Senior High) $220,000,000 0 0.056 0.998 Total $443,000,000 850 0.235 B { $8,792.33 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Temporary/Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $315,000 24 0.13 0.097 $165.51 C 2 (Middle School) $315,000 29 0.049 0.016 $8.52 C 3 (Senior High) $315,000 31 0.056 0.020 $11.38 Total $945,000 84 0.235 C $185.40 State Funding Assistance Credit per Multi-Family Residence (formerly"State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance% x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance SPI Sq.Ft./Student Equalization% Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $246.83 115 0.5186 0.13 $1,913.69 D 2 (Middle School) $246.83 148 0.5186 0.049 $928.30 D 3 (Senior High) $246.83 173 0.5186 0.056 $1,240.12 D b $4,082.11 Tax Credit per Multi Family Residence Average MF Residential Assessed Value(AAV) $220,293 Net Present Value(per EC)(NPV) 8.77 Current Debt Service Rate/1,000 ( r) 0.10% TC K $1,971.67 (Below used to calculate NPV) Current Bond Interest Rate 3.58% Years Amortized (10 Years)-Used in NPV Calculation 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility/Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC 0 Fee Recap** A = Site Acquisition per Multi-Family Unit $0.00 B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $8,792.33 C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $185.40 Subtotal $8,977.73 D = State Match Credit per MF Unit $4,082.11 TC=Tax Credit per MF Unit $1,971.67 Subtotal $6,053.78 Total Unfunded Need $2,923.95 50%Developer Fee Obligation $1,462 FC=Facility Credit(if applicable) 0 District Adjustment ($1,462) Net Fee Obligation per Residential Unit-Multi-family ($0.00) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX C) May 2023 31 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity Projected Projected %for SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE LOCATION Type Status Completion Program new Date Capacity Growth Approximate Approximate Map ELEMENTARY Map MIDDLE SCHOOL&SENIOR HIGH TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional Capacity #on 2 OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Land Use Land Use Map Designation Type Jurisdiction 12 256th-Covington(Halleson) 25435 SE 256th,Covington 98042 Rural To be sold King County 12a 156th-Covington(Wikstrom) 25847 156th Ave.SE,Covington 98042 Rural To be sold King County Notes: None Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 May 2022 32 Fairwood[,.iPwQed ■Elementary IQ '' McMICHFA HTS < Cedar Mountain SEAM _... Carriage Crest Ridgewood SE ;Qrl{lea ■Elementary ■Elementary Northwood' _ - Middle School rr Cedar Gri)Ye i Meeker ,j Middle School Lake Youngs P A N T tt E R Elementary 1Glenridge ■ Springbrook Elementary - - A jTAC 1 ■Elementary : I� Kent Laboratory A K EKentrdge ._Academy- ■High School Emerald Park OBrien , 1 Pther Lake■ ■Elementary I- i Elanementary - SoosCreek - MAP 'Irv rr �; .I Elementary .. MAPLG V ,n/ ■ River Ridge ,\ E R T 11 Sunrise Elementary ■ / Elementary I�fO Park Orchard - - x Y N ely.O'erien ■Elementary J Elementary Meridian S 1, ■ i Middle School _ Mill Creek East Hill _._ ■ eSchool. ■Eierhentary - - Daniel Martin Mattson Kent - Elementary Sort- Middle School 1At �■Ear Learning Ken Meridia• ■Elementary ■ CreslWood Center than �. ■.Elementary 'East Hill Kent School12 �an Wilderness ' Kent S<ho Administration - .. enter _-_■Center a ri�i b ■ M'gharood � ■iGfa ■Scenic Hill r gOum(T p, EI 11a�ent High School .Cedar Valley Elementary �� La Jenkins Creek Elementary Ele entary'■ ■ Cedar Heights ■Mille um Middle School STAR Ele ent LAKEMead -- Pine Tree Horizon Thomas Elementary Ridge■ en a, ■,.Elementary Covington Grass Lake ■Elementary 1 O Rerrydaie (SooS) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Kentlake High School SITE ACQUISITIONS ■ Sawyer Woods Lee Rill 1 C 1 Elementary ■ WyoaCo 11L�_VJJILP 33 ®copyright KROLL MAP COMPANY,INC.This map has been modified by KSD 05/22 IX - Summary of Changes to June 2022 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993.The primary changes from the June 2022 Plan are summarized here. Capacity changes continue to reflect fluctuations in class size ratio and program changes. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect use, lease or purchase,sale, surplus and/or movement between facilities. The District will be moving to a K-5 Elementary and 6-8 Middle School model beginning the 2023-2024 school year. Capacity has been added at the middle school level by reopening the former Sequoia Junior High (now Canyon Ride Middle School). The district worked with Educational Data Solutions, LLC to update student generation factors. The updated rates are included in the body of the Plan. The student headcount enrollment forecast is updated annually. All Elementary schools now have Full Day Kindergarten so six-year Kindergarten projections were previously modified to meet the requirements for Full Day Kindergarten programs at all elementary schools. The district expects to receive some State Funding Assistance (formerly called "state matching funds")for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded site and facility need will be reviewed in the future. The impact fees for 2024 calendar year will result in no collection of impact fees for both Single-Family and Multi-Family due to the capacity study completed in Spring 2023. 34 X - Appendices Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors Include: ITEM /Type Dec ease FROM TO r Comments Student Generation Factor Elem 0.27 0.248 -0.022 Single Family(SF) MS 0.105 0.085 -0.020 SH 0.075 0.107 0.032 Total 0.45 0.440 -0.010 Decrease Student Generation Factor Elem 0.082 0.130 0.048 Multi-Family(MF) MS 0.035 0.049 0.014 SH 0.029 0.056 0.027 Total 0.146 0.235 0.089 Increase State Funding Assistance Ratios("State Match") 52.49% 51.86% -0.63% Per OSPI Website Area Cost Allowance $242.26 $246.83 4.570 Per OSPI Website Link Average Assessed Valuation(AV) SF $574,784 $653,485 78,701 Per King County AV-Average of Condominiums&Apts. MF $360,790 $220,293 (140,497) Per King county Debt Service Capital Levy Rate/$1000 $0.93 $1.02 $0.09 Per King Co.Assessor Report General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 2.45% 3.58% 1.13% Bond Buyers 20 year GO Index Impact Fee-Single Family SF $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 No Change Impact Fee-Multi-Family MF $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 No Change 35 Kent Reporter Affidavit of Publication State of Washington ) County of King } ss Rudi Alcott being first duly sworn, upon oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal representative of the Kent Reporter a weekly newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal newspaper by order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the first publication of the Notice hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a weekly newspaper in King County, Washington and is and always has been printed in whole or part in the Kent Reporter and is of general circulation in said County, and is a legal newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99 of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter 213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, by order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed is a true copy of KEN987743 ORDS 4474- as it was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper and not as a supplement form thereof for a period of I issue(s), such publication commencing on I1/24/2023 and ending on 11/24/2023 and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. The amount of the fee for such publication is S244.17. Subscribed and sworn before me on this day of !� "N" N ry Public in and for the State of t Washington. } �ryy�7y{/(� •Al City of Kmt.City Clerk-LEGAL ADS;5043143' `���_•y�"'7. _`�;/ KIMKOMOM 0 Classified Proof CITY OF KENT NOTICE OF ORDINANCES PASSED 13Y THE KENT CITY COUNCIL The following are sum- maries of ordinances passed by the Kent City Council on November 21,2023. ORDINANCE NO. "74 -AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending various sec- tions of Chapter 3.70 of the Kent City Code,enti- tled "Public Contracting and ProcuremenP to add options for the procure- ment of public works: to recodify ShoWare Cen- ter purchasing authority for clarity; to delegate the author¢adon of cer- tain software renewals to the Mayor, and to dele- gate the authorization of insurance contracts and renewals to the Mayor. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty days from and after its passage as prwided by law. ORDINANCE NO. 4475 -AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent,Washington,ap- proving the consolidating budget adjustments made between jut o f, 2023 and September 30, 2023,reflecting an over- all budget increase of $4,079,26C This ordi- nance shall take effect and be in force five days after publication,as pro- vided bu law ORDINANCE NO.4476 -AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the Kent Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities Element to reflect asix- Proofed by Jennifer Tribbett,02/20/2024 02:22:45 pm Page:2 Classified Proof year plan for capital im- provement projects, the sic-year Capital Im- provement Plan of the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority, and the six-year Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Au- bum, Federal Way, and Highiine School Districts (2024-2029). This ordi- nance shall take effect and be in force 30 dais from and after its pas- sage, as provided by law. ORDINANCE NO. 4477 -AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending Sections 12.13,040, 12A3.130, 12.13.1W, 12.13.170, and 12AS.040,and add- ing new section 12.15.130 of the Kent City Code to adjust the school and fire impact fee schedules.This ordi- nance shall take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its pas- sage, as provided by law. ORDINANCE NO. 4t78 -AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, levying 2023 properly taxes for the second year of the 2023-2024 biennial budget for the City of Kent. This ordi- nance shall take effect and be in force five days after the date of its publi cation as provided far by RCN 35A.11.090 and RCW 35A.12.130; how- ever, the property tax levied through this ordi- nance shall not be as- sessed for collection un- tit January 1,2024. ORDINANCE NO.4479 -AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of tihe City of Kent.Washington,re- lating to the mid biennial review and modification of the 2023-2024 bienni- al budget as required by RCW 35A.34.130 and Ordinance No. 4451; adopting certain modifi- cations to the 2024 bud- get;and establishing an effective date. This ordi- nance shall take effect and be in force five days after the date of its pubi- cation as provided for by RCW 35A.11.090 and RCW 35A.12130; how- ever.the budget author- ized through this or& nance shag be effective January 1,2024, A copy of the complete text of any ordinance will be railed upon request of the City Clerk. Kimberley A. Komoto, City Clerk Kkornoto q KentWA.oov 253-856-5725 #987743 11/24123 Proofed by Jennifer Tribbett,02/20/2024 02:22:45 pm Page:3