Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Regular Agenda - 10/17/2023 ^*4 KENT CITY COUNCIL AGENDA • Tuesday, October 17, 2023 KENT 7:00 PM WASH I NGTON Chambers A live broadcast is available on Kent TV21, www.facebook.com/CityofKent, and www.youtube.com/user/KentTV21 To listen to this meeting, call 1-888-475-4499 or 1-877-853-5257 and enter Meeting ID: 872 6680 2078 Passcode: 004526 Join the meeting Mayor Dana Ralph Council President Bill Boyce Councilmember Brenda Fincher Councilmember Zandria Michaud Councilmember Satwinder Kaur Councilmember Toni Troutner Councilmember Marli Larimer Councilmember Les Thomas ************************************************************** COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 7 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2. ROLL CALL 3. AGENDA APPROVAL Changes from Council, Administration, or Staff. 4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A. Public Recognition 1. Proclamation for Hindu American Awareness and Appreciation B. Community Events C. Public Safety Report 5. REPORTS FROM COUNCIL AND STAFF A. Mayor Ralph's Report B. Chief Administrative Officer's Report City Council Meeting City Council Regular Meeting October 17, 2023 C. Councilmembers' Reports 6. PUBLIC HEARING A. Second Public Hearing on the 2024 Mid-Biennium Budget Adjustments B. Second Public Hearing on the 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Plan C. Public Hearing on the 2023 Tax Levy for the 2024 Budget D. Public Hearing on the Comprehensive Plan Capital Facilities Element Amendment to incorporate the City Capital Improvement Plan; Auburn, Kent, Highline and Federal Way School Districts' Capital Facilities Plans; and the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authorities Capital Improvement Plan E. Public Hearing on Kent City Code Amendments for School Impact Fees and Fire Impact Fees 7. PUBLIC COMMENT The Public Comment period is your opportunity to speak to the Council and Mayor on issues that relate to the city of Kent or to agenda items Council will consider. This is not an open public forum and comments that do not relate to the business of the city of Kent are not permitted. Additionally, the state of Washington strictly prohibits people from using this public comment opportunity for political campaign purposes, including to support or oppose a ballot measure or any candidate for public office. Speakers may not give political campaign speeches but must instead speak concerning a matter on the City Council's agenda or matters concerning the general business of the City of Kent. Further, in providing public comment, speakers must address the Mayor and Council as a whole; remarks intended to target an individual on the dais are not permitted. Finally, please note that this public comment opportunity is for you to provide information to the Mayor and City Council that you would like us to consider, but we will not be able to answer questions during the meeting itself. The City Clerk will announce each speaker. When called to speak, please step up to the podium, state your name and city of residence for the record, and then state your comments. You will have up to three minutes to provide comment. Public Comment may be provided orally at the meeting, or submitted in writing, either by emailing the City Clerk by 4 p.m. on the day of the meeting at CityClerkcdkentwa.gov or delivering the writing to the City Clerk at the meeting. If you will have difficulty attending the meeting by reason of disability, limited mobility, or any other reason that makes physical attendance difficult, and need accommodation in order to provide oral comment remotely, please contact the City Clerk by 4 p.m. on the day of the meeting at 253-856-5725 or CityClerk0ken twa.go v. Alternatively, you may email the Mayor and Council at MayorPKentWA.gov and CityCouncil@KentWA.gOV. Emails are not read into the record. S. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of Minutes i. Council Workshop - Workshop Regular Meeting - Oct 3, 2023 5:15 PM ii. City Council Meeting - City Council Regular Meeting - Oct 3, 2023 7:00 PM City Council Meeting City Council Regular Meeting October 17, 2023 B. Payment of Bills - Authorize C. Agreement with Evergreen Technologies, Inc for Access Control and Security Camera Upgrades at the City Shops - Authorize D. Agreement with Convergint Technologies, LLC for Fire Alarm Upgrades at the Centennial Center - Authorize E. Amendment to Consultant Services Agreement with Berger Partnership for Garrison Creek Park - Authorize 9. OTHER BUSINESS 10. BIDS 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION AND ACTION AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION 12. ADJOURNMENT For additional information, please contact Kimberley A. Komoto, City Clerk at 253-856-5725, or email CityClerk@kentwa.gov. Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City Clerk at 253-856-5725 in advance of the meeting. For TDD relay service, call Washington Telecommunications Relay Services at 7-1-1. 4.A.1 PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, the City of Kent is home to a significant Hindu American population and approximately 3.4 million Hindu Americans live across the nation; and WHEREAS, Hindu Americans in Kent represent diverse ethnic backgrounds, including individuals of Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Malaysian, Indonesian, Afghani, Nepali, Bhutanese, Sri Lankan, Fijian, Caribbean, and European descent; and .E WHEREAS, Kent and our nation have greatly benefited from Hindu Americans, especially o through the Vedanta philosophy, Ayurvedic medicine, classical Indian art, dance, music, meditation, yoga, literature, and community service; and WHEREAS, the year 2023 marks the 130th anniversary of when Hinduism was officially a introduced to the United States by Swami Vivekananda at the 1893 World's Parliament of Religions in Chicago, IL; and o r WHEREAS, most Hindu immigrants have come to the United States as students, in search U of better economic opportunities, or to unite with family members, while others have �. arrived in this country after facing religious persecution in their countries of origin; and a a WHEREAS, Hindu Americans share the entrepreneurial spirit of America and contribute to Kent's economic vitality, growth, and wellbeing; and y a� c WHEREAS, Kent Hindu temples, organizations, and individuals actively engage in seva, a ;v Sanskrit word for selfless service towards their fellow human beings through charity and 3 public service; and a c c� WHEREAS, despite their positive contributions to Kent and this nation, Hindu Americans L face stereotypes and misconceptions about their heritage and have been the targets of E bullying, discrimination, hate speech, and bias-motivated crimes; and a WHEREAS, Hindu Americans promote the ideals of tolerance, pluralism, and religious freedom, which are inherent to their beliefs and respect the diversity of all faiths, c 0 NOW THEREFORE, I, DANA RALPH, MAYOR OF KENT, DO HEREBY PROCLAIM THE o MONTH OF OCTOBER, 2023 TO BE E Hindu American Awareness and Appreciation Month 0 L in Kent Washington in order to increase awareness and understanding of the Hindu a American community and to encourage all residents to recognize and acknowledge the o significant contributions made by Kent residents of Hindu heritage to our City. .E In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand this 17t" day of October, 2023. E U 1�J G- Mayor Dana Ralph Packet Pg. 4 5.B DO C re P� o of department highlights October1 c� opportunity to learn about policy ADMINISTRATION development, best planning practices, and a implementation strategies from — Administration contemporaries across the state. With the • Staff worked with Briahna Murray on the scale of legislative actions at the state level 0 legislative agenda which was presented to during the last session top of mind, this E the Council's Committee of the Whole on was an informative conference full of ,° October 17. The legislative agenda will go substantive sessions led by colleagues before Council for Final approval on public and private from across the state November 7. As in years past, staff will be discussing how to prepare for and available to legislators requesting Kent's implement the required changes. 0 input on legislative matters under consideration. ) • Administration has started the recruitment Tax and Business Licensing a) process to fill the vacant Council secretary ' The Tax Division continues to work with FileLocal member cities, reviewing and o position. planning for enhancements and upgrades Communications in 2024. This involves reviewing the 2 • Make plans to attend the Haunted Boo- budget, prioritizing requests, and obtaining h levard at Kent Station, Tuesday, October feedback from the vendor that provides IT 31 from 4:30-6:30 p.m. Dress up and support to the platform. We are also a trick-or-treat around Kent Station! continuing long term planning for the eventual migration to a new online filing o Administration, Public Works, Police, platform. Parks and the Mayor will all be there • The City imposes utility tax on each `o W handing out candy and treats! Be sure organization that provides utility service M to stop by the City booths and vote for inside of City limits. Utility services ; your favorite decorated trunk. including electricity, natural gas, E o Details and/or sign up to decorate your telephone/cell, cable television, water, 0 trunk: www.kentstation.com/kent- sewer, and solid waste collection are all subject to City utility tax. Currently all station-haIloween Utility tax returns are submitted via paper return. The Tax Division is working with IT ZEE��� to build an online filing platform so Current Planning businesses can file their returns and submit Last week the Current Planning Division payments online. The team anticipates full • headed east for the annual APA WA functionality and final rollout in 2025. Conference in Spokane. This is an exciting Page 1 of 11 Packet Pg. 5 5.B Accounting, Reporting, and Payroll • Benefit team members attending Workday • Accounts Payable has reissued Fundamentals Training approximately 30% of the unclaimed • Working with Employees and Managers on property notifications previously mailed for Protected Leave cases and ADA the period of July 2020 through June 2022. Accommodations All remaining unclaimed property will be • We have finalized our RDS Application for reported to the State by the end of October 2024 (Retiree Drug Subsidy) 2023. Risk Management Customer Service Our Risk Manager is attending the PRIMA • The utility billing total for September was Institute from October 16-20, please reach $8.32 million; the second highest billing of out to Risk Management, if you need the year. The July billing was just over $9 immediate assistance. million. While the 2023 rate increase was We are continuing to work on getting all 9.5 percent, the July total billing was an staff registered in AlertMedia. increase of 19 percent over 2022. The Workday City's higher than normal summer water Many new process improvements have use is consistent with state-wide drought been initiated in Workday—including a conditions. more concise approval process, refined U notifications, and a more intuitive new hire E onboarding process. ° 4- • New Workday Job Aids have been updated Recruiting on the SharePoint site. ° • Phone screen interviews for Administrative Process Improvements Assistant 2 (Finance) on 10/11 . Members of leadership will be attending the L • Phone Screen interviews for Labor Analyst teachingfacility, Kaas Tailored at the end ° on y, a Ongoing Engineering 18 • g interviews for Civil En ineerin of the month, learning how we might apply new lean methodologies within our City ) Designer 2 in Public Works • Evidence Technician Supervisor written organization. Department Updates �- exam 10/13 • Emergency Response System: Alert Media • Harrison Kass- Multimedia Designer training is complete. Recorded sessions (Admin), effective 10/16 are saved in NeoGov. Test alerts will be N • Sang Park- Engineer IV (ECD) effective sent out October 19th in concert with the c 10/16 Great Shakeout. E • Mark Mandella- Police Officer (PD)- • New Hire Orientation: The first refresh of a effective 11/1 Andrea Madsen promoted to Tax Manager the New Hire Orientation occurred on • October 2, including a more robust 10/16 introduction to the City, support staff, • Eric Tung promoted to Commander ° systems and the perks and benefits effective 10/16 available to employees. IT followed with a •2 Reporting one-hour introduction to their equipment, ' • Preparing for the Federal EEO-4 biannual systems, and security. Facilities provided a E report, due by 12/5/2023 ° map of all available parking in the area. Benefits Multi-Media created a gift box for the new • Finalizing Benefits renewals for 2024 hire swag. We are currently working on a • Preparing for Open Enrollment new hire video, to include the Mayor, CAO communications and system set up• Open Enrollment is scheduled for 10/26- and HR Director that will speak to our 11/9 values, strategy, and areas of focus as an • Working through projects (cases) with our organization. This has been a wonderful Workday Consultant, CVS group effort by many departments. • Career Page: HR and Multi-Media are working on a total refresh of the current Page 2 of 11 Packet Pg. 6 5.B Career page to improve our recruiting efforts and the candidate experience. This Prepared 93 cases for jury trial spread will include new content, videos, photos, across 83 defendants for the October jury and a more current look. term. Preparing these cases for trial • Giving Campaign: HR has joined the Charitable Contributions Committee, to required staff to contact 159 civilian offer support in planning of events witnesses, conduct interviews, and review throughout the year, including the Giving all evidence associated with each case. As Campaign in October. The donations are part of this process, staff reviewed body starting to pour in—a huge thank you to cam footage that totaled nearly 167 hours our Kent Station retailers, and many in length, which is the equivalent of over generous organizations in our community 20 days of work for a single full-time and throughout Puget Sound. employee. • Assisted Facilities staff in the negotiation of c a potential settlement to resolve claims Information Technology Projects concerning damage to an on-site ; • End Point Privilege Management - To 0 remove excessive user privileges and generator. L) control end users' rights on specifically Attended meeting with the City's Title VI c called out applications and computer Committee to identify vital documents y functions. For the City of Kent, most issued by the Law Department that should 0 importantly, it is to remove the be translated into other languages. "Administrative Rights" on their 0 Advised Facilities and IT staff on workstations/computers. o Commvault Replacement - To replace the procurement and contractual issues for the a) • existing enterprise data backup and Courtroom Refurbishment Project at Kent W recovery solution before the current on- Municipal Court. premises solution reaches end of life and • Advised Parks and City Administration on support. procurement and contract matters related 0 Information Technology operational support > to various ongoing projects. w for October 1, 2023 to October 10, 2023 . Assisted outside counsel on a number of N • Number of tickets opened - 141 • Number of tickets closed - 236 cases currently in litigation. E • Assisted the Clerk's Office on the a coordination and processing of large public • Received a total of 241 cases from the records requests. U Worked with staff to acquire the property c Police Department to review and assess for 0 the filing of criminal charges. Of those rights necessary to complete various M cases, 97 were for in-custody defendants projects throughout the City. E which necessitated rush filing the next PARKS, RECREATION, . E business day after arrest. COMMUNITY SERVICES U • Covered 64 court calendars in September, which included 1,553 cases scheduled for Recreation and Cultural Services hearing, spread across 1,064 defendants. Forty-four artists submitted digital artworks Of those' 559 cases were for 318 to be considered for the Kent Arts Commission's new Digital Art Project, defendants who were held in-custody. Of which will exhibit work by media artists via the remaining 746 defendants who were the projector at Kherson Park. A selection required to appear in court on an out-of- panel is currently reviewing the custody basis, 183 failed to appear. submissions. Page 3 of 11 Packet Pg. 7 5.6 • Artworks by Toka Valu and Sonya Lang are Ready set bowl! Forty-three adaptive on display in the Centennial Gallery recreation bowlers rolled out their season through October 26. with a bang. Athletes will practice each • We are looking forward to the opening of week hoping their highest average will earn the 2023-2024 Spotlight Series in less than them an opportunity to compete in the two weeks. The Vienna Boys Choir is one of Special Olympics Fall Games on October the oldest and most famous chorale groups 29th. Go Kent Parks! in the world. They will perform at Facilities Kentwood High School Performing Arts • Solar + storage feasibility study is Center on Tuesday, October 17 at 7:30 completed. Grant acceptance with p.m. Commerce is in process. • The Senior Transportation program, funded • Courthouse and Corrections generator through the Veterans, Seniors and Human project is getting closer to completion. The a Services Levy, has been very successful in generator is set and we're still waiting on co providing rides to medical appointments as PSE. Inspections are this week and we'll = well as the senior center. The program have more updates on timing. Starting to provided over 150 rides covering 1,345 communicate the switchover process with ; miles between July and September. This is all stakeholders. 0 service is instrumental in helping senior Kent Commons renovation floor plan is E individuals maintain their independence complete. We've delayed the start date to ,° while improving mental health and keeping mid-March due to additional mechanical our roads a bit safer. engineering plans needed. This works out a • Fall is a wonderful time to be part of Kent for winter program scheduling for the Senior Activity Center. Popular offerings Commons as well. included several outreach events including • Court room renovation is out to bid with a the Food Truck Frenzy, Annual Fall bids due 10/12/23. Targeting Council Luncheon, Wellness and Resource Fair, and meeting 10/17/23 for bid award. ) L an Expanding your Mind class on hate • Siemens HVAC controls project is crimes, forgiveness, and moving on. These underway. We plan to complete before o events attracted more than 700 individuals October 2023. Graphics are being finalized > to the senior center. and if they stay on track, we should be • Kent Senior Activity Center is back to full tracking toward that still. Once this is N operation as 3rd quarter statistics indicate! complete, the old system will still be in c With extensive programming (100+ place until we're fully trained on the new E activities) for the 50+ community, over system. w 13,000 activity check-ins were logged on City Hall Campus generator controls are °' My Senior Center software. Additionally, complete. Testing went well and we're still U over 8,500 volunteer hours were tracked planning a second. c for senior center services or community A new sign for Russell Road Shops is programs supported by the senior center. complete. At minimum wage, these hours save the New RFA badging still in process. Senior Center over $133,790. Centennial Center fire alarm upgrades is E • Staff has been working with various awarded and going to consent calendar U partners at Meeker Middle school to kick off 10/17/23. a two day per week after school program. The new access control and security Healthy cooking was once again the most cameras system is complete at Driving popular program of choice by almost all 50 Range. students registered. The program Russell Road Shops security upgrades are introduces teens to cooking, "from scratch going to consent calendar 10/17/23. After as much as possible," as well as teaches approval we'll be working to get the new them about reading food labels and system installed. shopping on a budget. Page 4 of 11 Packet Pg. 8 5.B • New burglar alarm panels have been • On September 28, at 1:01am, officers were installed at IT Annex, Senior Center and dispatched to a carjacking in the 26400 Commons. block of Military Rd S. Upon arrival officers • HVAC team has been busy the last month contacted the victims who stated they were with annual fire testing. A lot of repairs driving at the intersection when a vehicle were needed this year that they're working rear ended them. They moved off the through. roadway with the intent of talking to the at • Prepping for the annual heating switch over fault driver. They thought the occupants of at City Hall. Monitoring the weather closely that vehicle were carrying flashlights as to determine the best time which will be they got out, but soon found that they very soon. were carrying firearms with mounted • A new glass partition for the Customer lights. The suspects forced the victims out Service counter at Centennial Center is of their vehicle and left northbound on complete. Military. One of the victims fought with one 0 • Custodial Supervisor job post was of the suspects which ended with that republished. suspect firing multiple rounds in the • New garage doors for the Golf Course is direction of one of the victims. The ; complete. suspects fled in both vehicles at the L) • Working on a new gate enclosure area at conclusion of the robbery. Officers located E the back parking lot at Senior Center to the victim vehicle and a pursuit ensued but 0 secure their vehicles. was terminated after losing sight of it on • Working on a new sign for the front of the the west hill of Kent. Officers were later a Golf Course is tentatively scheduled for the dispatched to a follow up where the week of 10/16/23. suspect vehicle used in in the incident was located unoccupied. The vehicle was the a same suspect vehicle in a commercial Staff Changes - Hiring/Retirement/ burglary. The victim's vehicle was later a Recruitment/Leaves/Promotions recovered along with another vehicle taken Records Specialist Sarah Hoffman started in a carjacking out of King County. • o October 2. Detectives are currently investigating this • Officer Amarah Kandeh separated October 5. serial spree. M Significant Crime Activities/Arrests/ On September 28, at 3:41am, officers were N Investigations dispatched to an assault with a weapon :c • On September 27, at 1:22am, officers were within the Driftwood Apartments located at 'D dispatched to a commercial burglary in 1610 W James PI. Upon arrival they progress at Rain City Tactical located at contacted the victim who suffered a large 18801 East Valley Hwy. They were advised laceration to the hand/arm from a knife. U by the alarm company that multiple In summary, the victim went to a friend's ii subjects were seen and heard inside the apartment who had been sick. A known business. Upon arrival officers found the suspect was inside the apartment and front glass doors were smashed in and began arguing with the victim about not E video surveillance recorded the specific taking care of their mutual friend. The c vehicle used by the suspects which was suspect armed himself with a knife and U reported stolen out of Federal Way. The began swiping it at the victim until he suspects were seen on video stuffing connected across her arm. The suspect several firearm optics, ammunitions, plate then fled on foot. carriers and other unknown items into On September 28, at 9:47pm, officers were duffle bags. At the time of the report, it dispatched to a what turned out to be a did not appear any actual firearms were shooting at the 7-Eleven located at 24012 taken. 104th Ave SE. An employee at the business called 911 because a person walked into the store bleeding profusely. Page 5 of 11 Packet Pg. 9 5.6 Upon arrival officers contacted the victim victim vehicle but were unable to get into a who sustained a gunshot wound to the position to stop it. thigh. Officers and Detectives eventually On October 1, at 9:21am, officers were were able to identify the scene of the dispatched to a shooting at the Shell Gas shooting down the street and began Station located at 25014 74th Ave S. They investigating. It is not specifically known were advised the suspect had a gun, fired what led up to the incident at this time. it into the ground and had pointed it at a The victim remains in the ICU at the female's head. Upon arrival the victim and hospital. suspect were no longer on scene. Officers • On September 29, at 5:27pm, officers were reviewed the video surveillance and dispatched to a robbery that occurred at discovered the suspect and victim arrived the Bath and Body Works located at 26129 on scene in the same vehicle. It showed 104th Ave SE. Upon arrival officers the suspect pulled a gun from the vehicle a contacted the victim employee who stated and pointed it at the female's head a co she was ringing up another customer when couple times. At one point it appeared he = the suspect walked behind the counter fired the gun into the ground and both the demanding she open up the cash registers. suspect and victim began looking at the ; The suspect then pulled out a handgun ground picking up items and putting them L) from his sweatshirt. The suspect was able in the vehicle before both leaving in the E to gain access to the register and ended up involved vehicle. No injuries were ° taking over $350. The employees ran to reported. the back of the store when the suspect fled On October 1, at 3:42pm, officers were a the scene. The suspect was recognized as dispatched to an occupied stolen vehicle in someone who had shoplifted numerous the area of Railroad Ave S and E Russell St. times from the store in the past. Upon arrival the victim of the incident was Q. • On September 30, at 6:39am, officers were contacted stating the assault actually dispatched to a robbery that occurred at occurred at a business in the 200 block of E N L the Chevron located at 27121 Military Rd Morton St. In summary, on 9/30 the S. Upon arrival officers found the business victim's brother was warming up his o and a customer were robbed during the vehicle out front of their residence (live > incident. In summary, 3 suspects entered together) and someone stole the vehicle. the business armed with firearms. The first Today, while the victim was at work, two N suspect robbed a waiting customer of his subjects pulled up to his place of c wallet and then proceeded behind the employment and to his surprise they were E counter robbing the employee of around driving his brother's stolen vehicle. The w $200. The second suspect jumped behind victim confronted the driver who pulled out °' the counter and took various tobacco a gun, pointed it at him and threatened to U products. The customer reported he had kill him. The suspect fled in the stolen c credit/debit cards and $1100 in his wallet. vehicle, the victim tried to follow, but lost • On September 30, at 10:11pm, officers sight of the suspect. were dispatched to a carjacking that On October 2, at 5:27am, officers were occurred at the Ernie's Fuel Stop located at dispatched to a robbery that occurred at c 22010 84th Ave S. Upon arrival the victim the Metro Park and Ride located at 26805 U was contacted and stated he was at the 132 Ave SE. Upon arrival they contacted location when one of the suspects the victim who stated he had won between approached him requesting assistance with $9000 and $10000 at two different local jumping his vehicle. The victim drove casinos that night. He also met one of the around the side of the business and pulled suspects, prior to winning all of the money. up to the only vehicle he saw. A second He ended up connecting with this male and suspect contacted the victim armed with a an unknown female suspect later on, and shotgun and they took the victim's keys they invited him to come to Kent. The and vehicle. Tukwila PD later spotted the three of them ended up at the metro park Page 6 of 11 Packet Pg. 10 5.6 and ride and upon arrival, two more suspects fled the scene with the victim's suspects walked up and robbed him of license plate. about $6000. The incident appeared to be On October 4, at 1:36pm, officers were an obvious set up. At 12:27pm, an officer dispatched to a shoplift at the 76-gas was dealing with another call for service station located at 1513 W Meeker St. when they contacted the female suspect Officers were advised a female suspect had from the robbery. During the same call for taken a purse from an unexpecting victim service officers located a vehicle occupied and fled the store. Upon arrival officers by two subjects who appeared to be the located the suspect at a bus stop down the robbery suspects. Two firearms were seen street and contacted her. The suspect inside their vehicle and it was taken as ended up lying about her identity and evidence. The female and one of the male made comments that she was involved in suspects were booked into jail for the the incident. Other officers established a robbery. probable cause to arrest the female for • On October 2 at 2pm, officers were theft and they began trying to take her into a dispatched to a robbery that occurred at custody. The suspect ended up biting one the Suncoast Hair Salon located in the officer who needed medical treatment and ; 18100 block of East Valley Hwy. Upon kicked others. The suspect was eventually 0 arrival they contacted the victims, who booked into jail for assaulting officers and E were mother and daughter, stating they theft. ° had been robbed at gunpoint. They parked On October 4, at 2:39pm, officers were their vehicle in the parking lot, and the dispatched to a robbery that occurred at a daughter went into the salon while the the Safeway located at 13101 SE Kent W mother remained inside their vehicle. At Kangley Rd. Upon arrival they contacted r- some point, the suspects opened the door the victim who stated she walked out of a to their vehicle and robbed the mother of a Safeway when the suspect ran up to her purse belonging to her daughter. As the and ripped her purse off her shoulder ) L suspects were driving away, the daughter causing her to fall to the ground. The ran up to the suspect vehicle, held onto the suspect quickly got into a nearby vehicle o door and tried to open it. Unfortunately and fled the area. The victim had to jump > she was unsuccessful and in the process out of the way as the suspect vehicle caused her to fall to the ground where she almost ran her over as it left. N sustained abrasions to her hands and legs. • On October 4, at 6:06pm, officers were c The suspects fled the scene in the vehicle. dispatched to a theft at a residence located E • On October 2, at 6:41pm, officers were in the 25400 block of 68th Ave S. Upon w dispatched to a carjacking at the Lowe's arrival they contacted the victim who located in the 24000 block of Pacific Hwy S. stated a female knocked on his door As they were enroute to the call, they were inquiring about purchasing flowers from his c advised there was a language barrier, and property. The victim explained that he the incident was actually a theft of a rented out his property to a flower farmer .2 license plate. Upon arrival, officers were and they were not for sale. After shutting told the victim was there attempting to find the door, he noticed two more people in his c employment when an unknown witness backyard who he contacted, and they also u told him someone was trying to steal the inquired about getting flowers. The victim rear license plate from his vehicle. The spoke to them for a short time until they victim went out to the parking lot and abruptly walked away joining up with the observed one of the suspects walking away original female who came to his door. with his license plate. The victim They all left the area together in a vehicle. confronted that suspect who was getting The homeowner returned inside to find that into a vehicle occupied by two other when the two female suspects had people. The two suspects in the vehicle distracted him, the first female was then pulled guns on the victim. The suspected of entering his home and Page 7 of 11 Packet Pg. 11 5.6 stealing valuables including jewelry valued unoccupied and still running. That vehicle over $10000. was impounded as evidence. • On October 5, at 8:11pm, officers were On October 7 at 1:06pm, officers were dispatched to a robbery that occurred dispatched to a shooting that occurred in outside of Trader Joe's located at 12925 SE the 10400 block of SE 236th PI. Upon Kent Kangley Rd. Upon arrival they arrival the victim, suspect, and involved contacted two female victims who had their vehicle were gone from the scene. A purses taken from them at gunpoint. One witness stated they observed a male and a of the victims was able to track her cell female associated with a vehicle get into a phone after the fact, but the suspects verbal argument out front of their threw it out of their vehicle in the 29900 residence. The witness saw the male point block of 132nd Ave SE which was a gun at the female during the argument recovered by police. This case appeared to and later heard a gunshot after the two a be related to case 23-13342. parties got back into their vehicle. The • On October 6, at 11:30am, Kent Detectives vehicle then left the scene. The described received information that a female victim involved male, female and vehicle were needed to report a robbery that happened similar to the same type of shooting that ; the day prior occurring at the Chevron occurred on 10/1/23 at the Shell Station at 0 located at 10715 SE 240th St. An officer 25014 74th Ave S documented in case 23- E contacted the victim and found there was a 13147. ° language barrier which was one reason On October 7, at 2:27pm, officers were why the incident was not immediately dispatched to a theft, which turned out to a reported. In summary, the victim(s) were be a robbery, at the Yummy Teriyaki walking down the street getting fresh air located at 10844 SE 208th St. Upon arrival when they were approached by two they contacted the victim who had been a suspects armed with handguns. They injured from being thrown to the ground. robbed the victims of their purses and The victim stated she just parked her ) L eventually got into a vehicle and fled the vehicle and walked around to the back of it scene. An unknown witness who helped when the suspect assaulted her while o the victims took a photo of the suspect trying to rip her purse from her grasp. The > vehicle license plate which matched up suspect used the purse and swung the with the robberies documented in cases victim around in a circle to jar it loose. The N 23-13342 and 23-13422. male then fled the area on foot. A witness c • On October 7, at 12:52am, officers were observed the incident and provided a E dispatched to a carjacking that occurred at license plate to the vehicle that the suspect w the Appian Way Apartments located in the fled in. 25800 block of 26th PI S. Upon arrival On October 7, at 9:26pm, officers were they found out the suspects were only dispatched to a shooting at the Action c successful in taking the victims' keys, not Sports Bar and Grill located at 25626 the vehicle. In summary, the victims 102nd Ave SE. Upon arrival they contacted •2 arrived home and had just parked their the victim who had been shot multiple vehicle when two unknown suspects times in the legs and arm. During the E approached, opened their vehicle doors, initial investigation, officers discovered the ci and began robbing them at gun point. The victim got into a verbal argument with a suspects were only able to gain access to family member who pulled out a gun and the victims' keys before other witnesses shot the victim. The victim was realized what was occurring. The suspect transported to the hospital to treat his ran to a vehicle and fled the area. At 0249 injuries. hours, officers were dispatched to a On October 8, at 3:12am hours, officers neighboring apartment complex for a were dispatched to a carjacking that suspicious vehicle and found it was occurred at the 76 Gas Station located at concerning the suspect vehicle. It was 1513 W Meeker St. Upon arrival they Page 8 of 11 Packet Pg. 12 5.6 contacted the victim who stated he was o 2023 Recycle Collection Events: The robbed at gunpoint and the suspects took final Saturday collection event was held his vehicle. The victim had been washing on October 14 at Hogan Park. his vehicle when the two suspects Construction approached him on foot. They were armed Washington Ave S Stormwater Pump with handguns and took the vehicle which Station: Submittal and RFI review ongoing. is still outstanding. Sewer manhole #2 set last week. Existing roadway on Washington Ave found to be PUBLIC WORKS 22" thick and an old concrete roadway has Survey been encountered below this about 5 feet • Survey Field staff are completing work on down. Working to remove concrete road Watermain locations on Smith St., locating and install sewer across Washington Ave. Lumen assets at Mill Creek, providing 108th Ave SE and SE 264th St Compact Roundabout: Contractor has begun site Cl) elevations for the Johnson Creek staff -0 gauges, staking curb locations on State work. Clearing and installing erosion Street and providing stakes for the 76th control items. Will work on storm to follow. U Ave. improvements. Streets o • GIS staff are working on linkages between Street Maintenance crews cleaned up the L) GIS and Laserfiche and updating PW West Hill Salt Site at Riverview Blvd, c Operations dashboards due to ArcGIS cleaned and swept debris off sidewalks and 0 software updates. GIS Portal Update is roadway on Washington Ave between S scheduled for Friday, October 20th. The 240th St and S 238th St, and on S 212th a Web GIS platform will not be available SE, west of Frager Rd, prepped and poured during the updated. All impacted users of for new sidewalk section at 203 E Gowe St, o the Kent Data Viewer, Cityworks Mapping prepped area for paving and hot patch and Field Maps/Collector applications will repair around the Salt Dome relocation at be notified via email prior to this update. the Sewer Decant site, and at 23414 95th ) Environmental Ct S, filled potholes at the SW corner of • 212th St Bridge and performed asphalt Community Programs/Events o o Recycling presentation: Tony Donati repairs on 212th St, west of Frager Rd, and > provided a recycling update at the Kent on 11395 196th St. 2 United Methodist Church on Monday, • Signs and Markings crews replaced signs N October 9th. Distributed reusable bags for the Retro-reflectivity program on SE c and kitchen countertop buckets to 236th PI, west of 132nd Ave SE, and on 'D promote waste reduction. 120th Ave SE, north of SE 240th St, and o TeamUp2CleanUp: Was held Saturday, installed school signage at 124th Ave SE September 30th from 9 am to noon. and SE 200th St. Volunteers checked in at three locations • Solid Waste cleaned up debris on S 277th c throughout the city to clean litter and St, from city limits to 111th PI SW, Military remove graffiti. Final numbers: 89 Rd from Reith Rd to S 272nd St, and volunteers collected 110 bags of trash removed graffiti at various locations E and totaled 212 volunteer hours. The including the Green Bridge abutment wall c next events will be held in May and and pillars, W Meeker St Bridge, and the U September of 2024. overpass on S 224th St and 88th Ave S, o Adopt-A-Street/Spot: 3rd quarter 104th Ave SE and SE 232nd St. yielded record numbers for bags of • Water Vegetation crews line trimmed, trash removed and volunteer hours. mowed, and picked up litter at Clark 3rd quarter numbers: Volunteers: 368; Springs Infiltration Gallery, Kent Springs Bags removed: 401; Volunteer hours: frontage, 3.5 Tank at 124th Ave SE and S 631. These numbers are equivalent to 239th St, Pumpstation #5, and Blue Boy at more than a full-time employee! 112th Ave and S 239th St. Page 9 of 11 Packet Pg. 13 5.B • Street Vegetation staff mowed strips on 25% Sodium Hydroxide delivery to the East 88th Ave S from S 228th St to S 218th St, Hill Well, and at Pumpstation #5. winterized and checked irrigation systems SCADA staff worked with RH2 on testing of on James St Hill, Pac Hwy, ShoWare SCADA project, continuance of 212th Center, Kent Kangley, S 204th St, and Treatment Plant upgrades and repairs, replaced plants on SE 256th St from 104th switch station 5 lead/lag pumps, added Ave SE to 116th Ave SE. HMI screen and recycle meters to the • The Sidearm crews mowed on 77th Ave S 212th Treatment Plant inflow program, and from S 212th St to 196th St, Riverview completed wiring and testing at the Union from the south end to 40th PI S, 40th PI S Pacific Storm Pump Station. from S 216th to 40th Ave S, 42nd Ave S Pumpstation crews cleaned, and pressure from S 212th St to S 216th St, S 216th St washed at Victoria Ridge, Linda Heights, from 42nd Ave S to 47th Ave S, SR515 and Lake Fenwick Pump Stations, and from SE 240th St to SE 192nd St, 124th replaced gate valve stem at the Frager CI) Ave SE from Kent Kangley Rd to SE 280th Pump Station St, 96th Ave SE, south of SE 248th St, and Storm Drainage/Vegetation Canyon Dr from Jason Ave N to 101st Ave Storm crews scupper cleaned (winter ; SE. prepped) at E Valley Hwy and S 192nd St, L) • Wetland Mitigation crews performed weed casted curb replacement at 4th Ave S and E control, mow, trim, and winterized W Titus, installed culvert extensions at ,° irrigation system at the Hytek North 12716 SE 258th St, located finger drains at Planting, Swan Court Planting, and replant Muth Pond on S 212th St and 46th Ave S, a Phase 3 at the Downey Site. saw cutting for future work and line Water/Sewer replacement at 22109 120th Ave SE, • Water Staff have kicked off fall hauled spoils from Vactor Site to Waste a maintenance activities in the distribution Management, and prepped KEHOC for system with dead end water main flushing containers. ) L and isolation valve exercising. Fire hydrant Crews also performed National Pollutant exercising and maintenance/repair Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) o continue on Kent's East Hill. Staff are assessing at SE 256th St and 124th Ave > potholing underground utilities for 2024 SE, 104th Ave SE and SE 264th St, SE W water main replacement project design. 256th St and 109th Ave SE, SE 256th St N • Sewer line cleaning and CCTV inspections and 111th Ave SE, SE 256th St and 114th c are ongoing in the area of SE 248th St Ave SE, Kent Kangley and 116th Ave SE, E from 120th Ave SE to 104th Ave SE and on Kent Kangley Rd and 137th Ave SE, SE w Military Rd from 259th PI to 239th St. 272nd PI and 118th Ave SE, SE 272nd PI °' Additional CCTV inspections at 102nd Ave and 120th Ave SE, SE 274th St and 124th U SE & S 239th St. A series of manhole Ave SE, SE 276th PI and 124th Ave SE, SE c repairs are underway in the area of 53rd PI 277th St and 120th Ave SE, SE 243rd St S and S 243rd St in the Lakes and 130th Ave SE, SE 254th Ct, and 127th •2 Neighborhood. Weekly and monthly Ave SE. inspections & cleaning continue. Wetland Maintenance crews performed line c Source, Supply and Pumpstations trimming, litter removal, and mowing of U • Source and Supply staff cleaned, and wetlands at Downey Site on 24000 block of pressure washed all pump stations, Frager Rd, Eagle Creek at 136th Ave SE continued upgrades and repairs for the and SE 282nd St, Johnson Creek at 4611 S 212th Treatment Plant, repaired fence and 215th PI, Nick Addition at 23329 117th Ave tree removal at Clark Springs, operated SE, and Boeing Wetlands at S 208th and Highline inter-tie, sealed vault lid at 66th Ave S, installed split rails and willow Guiberson corrosion, perform treatment removal at the Boeing Ditch on 6719 S run duties and wellhead sampling, chlorine 211th St, and removed tansy and purple delivery at Garrison and 212th, and caustic Page 10 of 11 Packet Pg. 14 5.B loostrife at Green River Natural Resource Area at 21615 64th Ave S. • Holding Pond crews line trimmed, cleared leaves, and mowed at Horseshoe Storm Pump Station at 1236 S Central Ave, Upper Mill Storm/Sewer Pump Station, UP Pump Station at S 260th St and 74th Ave S, 64th Ave S and W James St, Frager Pump Station at 21233 Frager Rd S, Kentview Pump Station at 22271 Frager Rd, 81st Ave Pump Station at 19602 81st Ave S, 84th Ave Pump Station at 21730 84th Ave S, Linda Heights Pump Station at 3406 S a 248th St, Lidenthal Pump Station at 26432 118th PI SE, Victoria Ridge Pump Station at 4815 S 272nd PI, James St Pump Station at 501 E James St, and 3rd Ave Pump Station at 1000 3rd Ave S, Upper Mill Holding Pond o U at 26710 104th Ave SE, Freshy's Pond at E 13022 SE 209th Ct, Willow Way at 22251 ,° 98th PI S, Washington Ave on 6832 S 251st St, and clean, prep, and organize for a tree season at the Shop on S 240th St. Fleet/Warehouse • The Warehouse crew have continued to a assist with CDL training, maintained the shops yard, keeping it clean and free of ) L litter and debris, cleaned and maintained the wash rack, washed, and vacuumed o motor pool vehicles, issued Personal > Protection Equipment (PPE) and motor pool :.- M vehicles to staff and hydrant meters to N contractors, repaired small equipment as c needed, received parts and inventory E orders, and hauled spoils as time and w equipment were available. • Fleet staff received new vehicles from the dealer and the upfitter, upfitted and built 0 new vehicles, put new vehicles into service, W delivered a new vehicle to Water section, worked on mower repairs, performed air ' E brake inspections, deidentified old trade in c vehicles and prepared them for auction and U worked on scheduled and non-scheduled maintenance repairs. Page 11 of 11 Packet Pg. 15 6.A KENT WASH IN G T O N DATE: October 17, 2023 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Second Public Hearing on the 2024 Mid-Biennium Budget Adjustments MOTION: I move to close the public hearing. SUMMARY: This is the second public hearing on the 2024 Mid-Biennium Budget Adjustment at the regular City Council meeting. Public input is welcome as the City prepares the 2024 Mid-Biennium Budget Adjustment. The Mayor's Proposed 2024 Mid-Biennium Budget may be found on the City's website at www.kentwa.gov/departments/finance <http://www.kentwa.gov/departments/finance>. BUDGET IMPACT: Packet Pg. 16 6.6 KENT WASH IN G T O N DATE: October 17, 2023 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Second Public Hearing on the 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Plan MOTION: I move to close the public hearing. SUMMARY: This date has been set for the second public hearing on the 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Plan. The Capital Improvement Plan is incorporated into the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan. Public input is welcome. The Mayor's Proposed 2024 Mid-Biennium Budget, which includes the Capital Improvement Plan, may be found on the City's website at www.kentwa.gov/departments/finance <http://www.kentwa.gov/departments/finance>. BUDGET IMPACT: Packet Pg. 17 6.0 140 KENT DATE: October 17, 2023 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Public Hearing on the 2023 Tax Levy for the 2024 Budget MOTION: I move to close the public hearing. SUMMARY: This is the public hearing on the 2023 Tax Levy for the 2024 Budget. Public input is welcome. BUDGET IMPACT: Packet Pg. 18 6.D KENT WASH IN G T O N DATE: October 17, 2023 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Public Hearing on the Comprehensive Plan Capital Facilities Element Amendment to incorporate the City Capital Improvement Plan; Auburn, Kent, Highline and Federal Way School Districts' Capital Facilities Plans; and the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authorities Capital Improvement Plan MOTION: I move to close the public hearing. SUMMARY: This is the public hearing to incorporate the following plans into the Comprehensive Plan Capital Facilities Element: • 2024-2029 City of Kent Capital Improvement Plan; 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Plan adopted by the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority; and • 2024-2029 Capital Facilities Plans for the Kent, Auburn, Federal Way, and Highline School Districts. BUDGET IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1. DRAFT Comp Plan Ordinance (PDF) 2. Exhibit A_City CIP (PDF) 3. Exhibit B_PSRFA (PDF) 4. Exhibit C_Auburn (PDF) 5. Exhibit C_Federal Way (PDF) 6. Exhibit C_Highline (PDF) 7. Exhibit C_Kent (PDF) 8. General Statistics Table (PDF) Packet Pg. 19 6.D.a c r c a� E c a� E Q c a� E ORDINANCE NO. w a� r AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the Kent Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities Element to reflect a six-year plan for capital improvement projects, the six-year Capital a Improvement Plan of the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority, and the six-year Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Auburn, Federal Way, and Highline School Districts (2024-2029). L a E 0 U d t RECITALS c 0 a� CU c •L A. The State Growth Management Act (GMA) requires the City to have a Capital Facilities Element within its Comprehensive Plan. To assure the Comprehensive Plans remain relevant and up to date, the GMA allows a amendments to the capital facilities element of comprehensive plans M concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a city budget, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130. c B. The City of Kent has established procedures for amending the 0 Comprehensive Plan in Chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code (KCC), allowing amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan a E concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the City's budget. As part c0 of these procedures the City Council may hold the public hearing instead of Q the Land Use and Planning Board as laid out in KCC 12.02.010m o r 1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment E to the Capital Facilities Element for 2024-2029 Capital Improvements r Q Packet Pg. 20 6.D.a c C. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.070(3), the Capital Facilities Element r c must include a six-year plan that shows how the City will finance such E capital facilities within projected funding capacities and identifies sources of funding for such purposes. Q c D. The City of Kent Finance Department has submitted proposed E a� amendments to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to w identify a six-year plan for capital improvement projects, including costs r and revenue sources. U_ E. Pursuant to RCW 82.02.050, impact fees may be collected and spent only for the public facilities which are addressed by the City's Capital L) c Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. In order to collect fire impact a aD fees to be spent by the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority (RFA), the City >_ c must adopt the RFA's Capital Improvement Plan into the City's Capital a� Facilities Plan Element. E F. On September 20, 2023, the Puget Sound Regional Fire ci a� Authority Governance Board voted to adopt Resolution 186 approving the r Puget Sound RFA 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Plan and Resolution 187 0, c approving the Puget Sound RFA 2024 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy. a� G. The City of Kent has adopted a school impact fee program as authorized by the GMA and RCW 82.02.050. Impact fees may be collected a and spent only for the public facilities which are addressed by the Capital N ti Facilities Plan Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. In order to collect M a� school impact fees to be spent by the school districts, the City must adopt the schools' Capital Facilities Plans into the City's Capital Facilities Plan L Element. 0 c H. The Kent, Federal Way, Highline, and Auburn School Districts a a have submitted proposed amendments to their Capital Facilities Plans to E U be included in an amendment of the City's Capital Facilities Element of the F_ Comprehensive Plan. o r 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment E to the Capital Facilities Element for 2024-2029 Capital Improvements r Q Packet Pg. 21 6.D.a c I. On September 22, 2023, the City provided the State of r c Washington the required 60-day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 of the E City's proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The 60-day notice period passed on November 21, Q c 2023. E a� J. On October 6, 2023, the City's SEPA responsible official issued w a SEPA Addendum to existing environmental documents consisting of the r Kent Comprehensive Plan Review and Midway Subarea Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Draft and Final (ENV-2010-3) and the Downtown Subarea Action Plan Supplemental EIS Draft and Final (ENV- c 2012-30). The SEPA Addendum explained that the proposed amendment a a� would not create unavoidable impacts beyond those previously identified in >_ c the EIS. a� K. After providing appropriate public notice, the City Council of E the City of Kent conducted public hearings on October 3, 2023, and October ci a� 17, 2023, to consider the proposed biennium budget and six-year plan for r capital improvements and the requested amendment to the Comprehensive 0, c Plan and its Capital Facilities Element. CU a� L. After providing appropriate public notice, the City Council of the City of Kent considered the requested Comprehensive Plan amendment a and held a public hearing on the same on October 17, 2023. N ti M. On November 21, 2023, the City Council for the City of Kent M a� approved the Capital Facilities Element amendment to the Kent Comprehensive Plan to reflect a six-year plan for capital improvement L projects (2024-2029), the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority's Capital 0 c Improvement Plan (2024-2029), and the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, a a Federal Way, Auburn, and Highline School Districts, as set forth in Exhibits E U A, B, and C attached and incorporated by this reference. Q 0 r 3 Comprehensive Plan Amendment E to the Capital Facilities Element for 2024-2029 Capital Improvements r Q Packet Pg. 22 6.D.a c NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, c WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: E c a� E ORDINANCE a c a� E a� SECTION 1, - Amendment. The Kent Comprehensive Plan and its w Capital Facilities Element are hereby amended to reflect a six-year plan for r capital improvement projects (2024-2029), as set forth in Exhibit A U_ attached and incorporated by this reference. U c SECTION 2. - Amendment. The Kent Comprehensive Plan, and its a a� Capital Facilities Element, are amended to include the Six-Year Capital >_ c Improvement Plan of the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority for the a� years 2024 through 2029, as set forth in Exhibit B attached and E incorporated by this reference. ci a� r c SECTION 3, - Amendment. The Kent Comprehensive Plan, and its 0, c Capital Facilities Element, are amended to include the Capital Facilities Plans CU a� of the Kent, Federal Way, Auburn, and Highline School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit C attached and incorporated by this reference. a N ti SECTION 4. - Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon M a� approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the L correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering; or 0 c references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations. a a E 0 U SECTION 5, - Severability. If any one or more section, subsection, or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such o r 4 Comprehensive Plan Amendment E to the Capital Facilities Element for 2024-2029 Capital Improvements r Q Packet Pg. 23 6.D.a c decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance r c and the same shall remain in full force and effect. E c E SECTION 6. - Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be Q c in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law. E 2 w m r U- DANA RALPH, MAYOR Date Approved .Q U ATTEST: a a� c a� KIMBERLEY A. KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted L Q E 0 Date Published a� r 0 APPROVED AS TO FORM: L 2 V TAMMY WHITE, CITY ATTORNEY a rn N ti M d V C R C E L O r- R a a E 0 U H U- Q d' r c 5 Comprehensive Plan Amendment E to the Capital Facilities Element for 2024-2029 Capital Improvements r Q Packet Pg. 24 6.D.b c� a E a� O N N 2024 2029 R C d E C C a ital d Q r C d W LL Improvement N O Q O U c c� a .y Program L E O U O t c O September 015,. =2023 a 01, o� N d U U KENT Z WASH IN G T O N t x W E a Packet Pg. 25 6.D.b c� a E a� O N N Q C R C d E C d E Q r C d E d W N N LL Q O U c c� IL w .y C d • DENT E WASH N I N G -r C N cU O t c O C d V a aM N M d U r U I Q Z - t X W r C _ d E t v R .r r a 2 Packet Pg. 26 6.D.b CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM E 2024-2029 SUMMARY PROJECTS AND FUNDING Y Capital project costs for the City's 2024-2029 capital planning period total $225.4 million and are funded with N City,utility and other resources, as illustrated in the following tables. Additional details follow. a c R Y City Resources $ 35,956 $ 16,783 $ 67,545 $ 120,284 Utility Resources 19,280 17,100 67,185 103,565 Other Resources 1,136 400 - 1,536 a Total-in thousands $ 56,372 $ 34,283 $ 134,730 $ 225,385 m E d W Summary Costs 2024 20251 1 N General Government $ 22,631 $ 3,704 $ 12,341 $ 38,676 +=_ Parks,Rec&Comm Services 6,041 5,237 22,485 33,763 v ca Public Safety - 350 250 600 ILL Transportation 8,420 7,892 32,469 48,781 Utilities 19,280 17,100 67,185 103,565 to Total-in thousands $ 56,372 $ 34,283 $ 134,730 $ 225,385 V c c� a a� Sources of Funds _ L Utility Q. Resources E 46% • O N Other +�+ Resources 1% 1 O 0) C L City Resources a) 53% _ V 7 a Proiects by Cateclory M • d General V Government >, Utilities 17% U 46% al Parks, Rec & .0 Comm Services 29 :E15% W x • C Public Safety Transportation p% E 22% V R .r r a. Packet Pg. 27 6.D.b CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM E OPERATING IMPACT OF MAJOR CIP PROJECTS 0 The impact of a capital project on the operating budget is a key factor in considering the inclusion of a project Q in the six-year plan. The operating costs of a project,and any savings resulting from the project,are captured -0 c in the Operating Budget. c m SOURCES OF FUNDS-in thousands 0 E 2024 2025 2026 2027Q r c Sources of Funds m 1= City Resources $ 35,956 $ 16,783 $ 16,491 $ 16,862 $ 16,969 $ 17,223 $ 120,284 d Utility Resources 19,280 17,100 16,965 16,585 17,135 16,500 103,565 W N Other Resources 1,136 400 - - - - 1,536 AD Total Sources of Funds $ 56,372 $ 34,283 $ 33,456 $ 33,447 $ 34,104 $ 33,723 $ 225,385 cC u_ • Q to 2024 2025 2026i i U C City Resources f° a CRF-Annual Allocation $ 7,125 $ 7,267 $ 7,413 $ 7,561 $ 7,712 $ 7,867 $ 44,945 N LU CRF General 11,837 2,010 1,910 1,547 1,428 1,340 20,072 'LL y C CRF REET2 2,701 1,846 2,046 2,598 2,553 2,711 14,455 t 0 Golf Admissions Tax 135 130 120 135 175 119 814 N L IT HLC/SLC Reserves 36 36 E accesso ShoWare Funds 770 775 330 300 300 300 2,775 U Criminal Justice Fund 2,000 2,000 t Faciltities Lifecycle 2,059 767 634 628 647 666 5,401 IT Operating Fund 502 502 552 607 668 734 3,565 0 Utility Funding 5,087 5,087 i Streets-Solid Waste Utility Tax 3,704 3,486 3,486 3,486 3,486 3,486 21,134 y Total City Resources 35,956 16,783 16,491 16,862 16,969 17,223 120,284 = Utility Resources (L Drainage Revenues 6,730 6,050 6,050 6,050 6,050 6,050 36,980 0) cc• Sewer Revenues 3,550 3,550 3,550 3,550 3,550 3,550 21,300 r- CO) Water Revenues 9,000 7,500 7,365 6,985 7,535 6,900 45,285 Total Utility Resources 19,280 17,100 16,965 16,585 17,135 16,500 103,565 d U IL r Other Resources U 1 American Rescue Plan Act(ARPA) 544 544 Q LID Funded 192 192 King County Levy 400 400 800 K Total Other Resources 1,136 400 1,536 W r C Total Sources of Funds $ 56,372 $ 34,283 $ 33,456 $ 33,447 $ 34,104 $ 33,723 $ 225,385 t v tv .r r a 4 Packet Pg. 28 6.D.b CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM E SUMMARY BY SOURCE 2024-2029 ' r O N N $in Thousands Q 60,000 r_ cv Y 50,000 E c W m 40,000 Q r c 30,000 m E W d 20,000 AD 10,000 v ca u_ Q 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 to — U N City Resources o Utility Resources iJ Other Resources ca a a� .y C 2024 SOURCES BY TYPE L E • O Drainage Revenues Sewer Revenues V o N 12% 6% .�+ C O Streets- Golf Admissions Tax I) Solid Waste Water Revenues 0.24% I r_ Utility Tax... • 16% L accesso ShoWare Funds v 7 Utility i i1 Funding... Other ITOperating Fund 0.9% 04 5% v Faciltities • i1 Lifecycle ARPA 1% U 4% M >� a+ Criminal L—LID Funded 0.3%_j VI Justice... I Q King County Levy 1% �= CRF-Annual .0 CRF... Allocation :E 13% z K W • C CRF General d E 21% t V R r a Packet Pg. 29 6.D.b CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM E PROJECTS-in thousands 0 N 2024 20251 I27 2028 2029 N Q Projects Iv General Government $ 22,631 $ 3,704 $ 3,176 $ 3,082 $ 3,043 $ 3,040 $ 38,676 Parks,Rec&Comm Services 6,041 5,237 5,084 5,710 5,764 5,927 33,763 m E Public Safety 350 250 600 Transportation 8,420 7,892 7,981 8,070 8,162 8,256 48,781 Utilities 19,280 17,100 16,965 16,585 17,135 16,500 103,565 Q Total Projects $ 56,372 $ 34,283 $ 33,456 $ 33,447 $ 34,104 $ 33,723 $ 225,385 m E d W N N 2024 20251 127 2028 2029 +' General Government • accesso ShoWare Center $ 770 $ 775 $ 330 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 2,775 Facilities 18,245 767 634 515 415 346 20,922 Technology 3,616 2,162 2,212 2,267 2,328 2,394 14,979 U c Total General Government 22,631 3,704 3,176 3,082 3,043 3,040 38,676 ca a Parks,Rec&Comm Services O LU Golf 135 130 120 135 175 119 814 LL Parks and Recreation 5,906 5,107 4,964 5,575 5,589 5,808 32,949 m • Total Parks,Rec&Comm Svcs 6,041 5,237 5,084 5,710 5,764 5,927 33,763 Q. Transportation O Site Improvements 8,420 7,892 7,981 8,070 8,162 8,256 48,781 U O Total Transportation 8,420 7,892 7,981 8,070 8,162 8,256 48,781 C O Public Safety Public Safety Projects 350 250 600 i Total Public Safety 350 250 600 Utilities v Water 9,000 7,500 7,365 6,985 7,535 6,900 45,285 3 Sewer 3,550 3,550 3,550 3,550 3,550 3,550 21,300 a Drainage 6,730 6,050 6,050 6,050 6,050 6,050 36,980 N Total Utilities 19,280 17,100 16,965 16,585 17,135 16,500 103,565 � CO) Total Projects $ 56,372 $ 34,283 $ 33,456 $ 33,447 $ 34,104 $ 33,723 $ 225,385 0_ U r U I Q Z X W r _ C d E t v R .r r a 6 Packet Pg. 30 6.D.b CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM : . E SUMMARY BY CATEGORY 2024-2029 0 N $in Thousands •' Q 60,000 r- cv 50,00 0 E c • m E 40,000 a c m E 30,000 d W N N 20,000 — .v ca u_ 10,000 ca — U 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 (L U General Government o Parks,Rec&Comm Services 6d Transportation o Utilities y c m t d L E 2024 BY CATEGORY FUNCTION ' 0 0 Water Sewer— 0) 18% 8% C L • Drainage v 14% a Public Safety Other 0.39% 04 0.68% Transportation accesso • d 18% ~~� —��� ShoWare V Center Zr 1.7% V I Golf 0.29% > Q Technology 6% K W • C Parks and Recreation m 0 E °12 Facilities 21% r a Packet Pg. 31 6.D.b CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM E GENERAL GOVERNMENT—in thousands 2 0 2024 2025v, • a Sources of Funds c CRF General Capital $ 11,837 $ 1,660 $ 1,660 $ 1,547 $ 1,428 $ 1,340 $ 19,472 American Rescue Plan Act(ARPA) 340 340 m accesso ShoWare Funds 770 775 330 300 300 300 2,775 D c IT Operating Fund 502 502 552 607 668 734 3,565 E Criminal Justice Fund 2,000 2,000 Q Utility Funding 5,087 5,087 Facilities Fund Balance 1,478 175 24 1,677 m E Faciltities Lifecycle 581 592 610 628 647 666 3,7242 w HLC/SLC Reserves 36 36 N Total Sources of Funds $ 22,631 $ 3,704 $ 3,176 $ 3,082 $ 3,043 $ 3,040 $ 38,676 Projects Li • Facilities Access Control 10 10 10 10 40 Closed Circuit TV(CCTV) 10 10 10 10 10 50 V c City Buildings-Exterior Painting 50 50 50 50 50 250 f° a Elevator Modernization 30 30 30 30 30 30 180 d Emergency Repairs 600 120 125 25 25 125 1,020 •y Facilities Reinvestment Fund 5,000 5,000 m • Fire Alarm Updagrades 50 20 20 20 20 130 Furniture,Fixtures,and Equipment 50 50 50 50 50 250 Q- HVAC Replacements 650 300 100 1,050 �o Kent East Hill Operations Center Phase 2 10,286 10,286 y Kent Police Department Facility Upgrade 350 350 Kitchen Equipment 225 25 25 25 25 25 350 0 Parking Lots Repair 10 65 64 51 48 65 303 0) c • Police Firing Range Upgrades 350 350 Public Building Major Maintenance 64 67 70 74 77 81 433 = Roof Repairs 320 20 80 170 70 20 680 SecurityCamera Upgrades 200 - - 200 Total Facilities 18,245 767 634 515 415 346 20,922 .. as N accesso ShoWare Center M Audio System Replacement 530 530 a Basket Ball Court Refurbish 50 50 V Chairs and Tables 35 35 35 35 35 175 r Concession Stand Rebranding 125 125 UI Floor Covering in Skate Areas 75 75 Q _ Half House Curtain and Vom Drapes 120 30 150 Hot Water Tank/Boilers(4) 200 200 400 x Loading Dock Gate/Fence 75 75 uJ r Mural Replacement 15 15 15 45 m Plaza Lighting 20 20 t Plaza Sound System 40 40 r a 8 Packet Pg. 32 6.D.b CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM E GENERAL GOVERNMENT CONTINUED—in thousands 0 2024 2025y • Q Popcorn Popper 15 15 Replace Hockey Rink Plexiglass 50 50 100 Restripping Parking Lot 20 20 y Roof Repair 100 100 E Stadium Seating Replacement 50 50 50 50 200 Suite and Club Rebranding 75 75 E Zamboni Replacement 150 150 300 Q r Unallocated - 65 150 65 280 m Total accesso ShoWare Center 770 775 330 300 300 300 2,775 E a) W Technology N HLC-Server Replacement 60 60 60 60 60 60 360 }' HLC-Telephony 60 60 60 60 60 60 360 HLC-Wireless Infrastructure Refresh 30 30 30 30 30 30 180 _ U_ HLC-Data Center 100 100 100 100 100 100 600 N HLC-Network Refresh 70 70 70 70 70 70 420 ca HLC-Security 153 130 130 130 130 130 803 — C) HLC-Storage Expansion 30 30 30 30 30 30 180 HLC-UPS 30 30 30 30 30 30 180 rld HLC-Virtualization Infrastructure Refresh 100 100 100 100 100 100 600 j SLC-Administration System Replacement Reserves 134 170 170 170 170 170 984 c SLC-IT System Replacement Reserves 150 150 150 150 150 150 900 SLC-Law System Replacement Reserves 50 50 50 50 50 50 300 3L SLC-Police System Replacement Reserves 130 130 130 130 130 130 780 E SLC-Human Resources System Replacement Reserves 70 70 70 70 70 70 420 • 0 V SLC-Finance System Replacement Reserves 100 100 100 100 100 100 600 My SLC-PRCS System Replacement Reserves 100 100 100 100 100 100 600 Fri SLC-Public Works System Replacement Reserves 150 150 150 150 150 150 900 Z 0 SLC-Court System Replacement Reserves 50 50 50 50 50 50 300 c SLC-Economic Development System Replacement Reserves 80 80 80 80 80 80 480 MC MDC Refresh 166 100 110 121 133 146 776 d Computer Refresh 292 402 442 486 535 588 2,745 B&0 and Business License Enhancements 187 187 eConnect Replacement 36 36 ri Internet I nfrastructure Assessment and Upgrade 275 275 cn Intranet Redesign 225 225 CIA JDE Replacement 250 250 Laserfiche Integrations 77 77 • d Laserfiche Stabilization 45 45 C) Tiburon Replacement-JMS 38 38 Tiburon Replacement-RMS 38 38 C) I Web Application Firewall 90 90 Q ZTA Program-Privileged Access Management Solution 250 - - 250 Total Technology Projects 3,616 2,162 2,212 2,267 2,328 2,394 14,979 Z K W Total General Government Projects 22,631 3,704 3,176 3,082 3,043 3,040 38,676 r c d E EL v cc .r r a Packet Pg. 33 6.D.b CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM E PARKS, RECREATION &COMMUNITY SERVICES—in thousands O N 2024 20251 127 2028 2029N Q Sources of Funds c CRFREET2 $ 2,000 $ 1,846 $ 2,000 $ 2,500 $ 2,500 $ 2,711 $ 13,557 +� c CRF-AnnuaIAllocation 2,805 2,861 2,918 2,977 3,036 3,097 17,694 CRF REET2 Fund Balance 701 46 98 53 898 Golf Admissions Tax 103 106 109 112 115 119 664 Golf Fund Balance 32 24 11 23 60 150 E Q King County Levy 400 400 800 ' Total Sources of Funds 6,041 5,237 5,084 5,710 5,764 5,927 33,763 d Projects W Golf Projects rn a� Bunker Sand 10 10 20 Cart Path Repairs and Repaving 25 25 25 75 Driving Range Net Replacement 50 50 50 150 LL • F0 Golf Cart Storage Doors 40 40 Irrigation Central Controller 40 40 Irrigation Satellite Controllers 25 25 25 75 V c Maintenance Equipment Replacement 175 175 M a Parking Lot Landscaping 35 35 aD Sprinkler Heads 20 20 20 20 80 LU y Miscellaneous Golf Projects 5 119 124 LL • Total Golf Projects 135 130 120 135 175 119 814 d L E O U O t c O C •IL L d V a o� N r- ILCO) d U IL r U I Q X W r C d E t v R .r r a 10 Packet Pg. 34 6.D.b CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM E PARKS, RECREATION &COMMUNITY SERVICES-in thousands 0 2024 2025 2026r2029 Total Q Parks and Recreation Projects Campus Park Improvements 368 368 Canterbury Park improvements 250 500 750 E Clark Lake Park Phase 1 Development 1,000 750 750 1,000 3,500 Commons Neighborhood Park Improvements 100 100 Downtown Parks Improvements 250 200 200 186 250 1,086 Q East Hill North Community Park Development 500 500 East Hill North Neighborhood Park Development 250 500 500 1,250 E Eastridge Park Renovation 150 200 350 d LLI Garrison Park Improvements 1,000 1,000 ayi Glenn Nelson Park Renovation 150 500 650 Hogan Park at Russell Road Phase 2 Renovation 350 350 .5 Kiwanis Tot Lot#4 Renovation 30 30 _ Ui KLVT-Old Fishing Hole Improvements 297 297 _ KVLT-Boeing Rock Improvements 177 250 500 927 KVLT-Meeker Parking Lot 355 355 U KVLT-Phase 2Improvements 250 250 Lake Fenwick Park Phase 2 Improvements 350 250 250 850 rld Mill Creek Canyon Trail Renovation 250 250 500 Mill Creek Canyon/Earthworks Park Improvements 500 750 750 750 1,000 1,000 4,750 _ North Meridian Park Redevelopment 200 350 750 500 1,800 Park Land Acquisition Account 250 250 250 250 250 250 1,500 Q. Park Operations Lifecycle 500 500 500 500 500 500 3,000 o Park Orchard Park Improvements 361 361 4C U Park Planning and Design(Masterplan/Architect) 50 50 50 150 Park Planning and Development Operating 921 996 1,046 1,098 1,153 1,211 6,425 rn Parks and Open Space Plan 250 250 500 0 0 Scenic Hill Park Renovation 150 500 650 c L Springwood Park 500 500 Sun Meadows Park Improvements 200 200 = Total Parks and Recreation Projects 5,906 5,107 4,964 5,575 5,589 5,808 32,949 Total Projects 6,041 5,237 5,084 5,710 5,764 5,927 33,763 a as N M • d U r U I Q t X LU • d E ML v R .r r a Packet Pg. 35 6.D.b CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM :z E TRANSPORTATION-in thousands O to 2024 20251 I27 2028 2029 Q Sources of Funds c CRF-AnnuaIAllocation $ 4,320 $ 4,406 $ 4,495 $ 4,584 $ 4,676 $ 4,770 $ 27,251 American Rescue Plan Act(ARPA) 204 204 LID Funded Projects 192 192 Solid Waste Utility Tax 3,704 3,486 3,486 3,486 3,486 3,486 21,134 Total Sources of Funds $ 8,420 $ 7,892 $ 7,981 $ 8,070 $ 8,162 $ 8,256 $ 48,781 Q r Projects m B&O In-house Overlays 250 250 250 250 250 250 1,500 m B&O Street Contracted 750 1,891 3,425 3,214 3,806 3,900 16,986 W B&O Unallocated 200 200 200 500 500 500 2,100 LID 362-84th Avenue Rehabilitation 168 168 LID 363-224th-228th(EVH-88th) 24 24 Residential Street Contracted 3,704 3,486 3,486 3,486 3,486 3,486 21,134 LL 0 EVH(212th-196th) 1,445 1,445 to Litter Strike Team 204 204 IZ Meet Me on Meeker 64th Avenue 1,000 1,000 U Mill Creek at 76th Avenue Flood Prevention 1,500 1,500 SR509-Stage 1b-SR516 Interchange Auxiliary Lane 250 250 250 250 1,000 a SR 509-Stage 2-Southbound Auxiliary Lane 250 250 250 250 1,000 > LU City Safety Transportation Program 120 120 120 120 120 120 720 Total Projects $ 8,420 $ 7,892 $ 7,981 $ 8,070 $ 8,162 $ 8,256 $ 48,781 L SZ E O U O t c O C • L d V LU CD cc N r- M d U r U I Q X W PA r _ C d E t v R .r r a 12 Packet Pg. 36 6.D.b CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM E UTILITIES-in thousands 0 N 2024 20251 127 2028 2029 N Q Sources of Funds Water Revenues $ 9,000 $ 7,500 $ 7,365 $ 6,985 $ 7,535 $ 6,900 $ 45,285 Sewer Revenues 3,550 3,550 3,550 3,550 3,550 3,550 21,300 E E Drainage Revenues 6,730 6,050 6,050 6,050 6,050 6,050 36,980 Total Sources of Funds $ 19,280 $ 17,100 $ 16,965 $ 16,585 $ 17,135 $ 16,500 $ 103,565 Q Projects Water Supply&Distribution m E 2024Watermain 400 400 m w 212th Treatment Plant Improvements 400 400 rn 228th-Central to 88th Waterline 600 400 1,000 590 Zone Transmission(EH 640 PZ) 980 980 640 Pressure Zone 2,000 2,500 4,500N LL co 640 Transmission Main Improvements(EH 640 PZ) 1,115 1,115 2,230 640 Zone BPS#2 (EH 640 PZ) 1,300 400 1,700 Q Caustic Tank Replacement EH Well&PS 5 250 250 - Clark&Kent Springs Chlorination Improvements 350 350 cu Garrison/0'BrienTreatment Plant 1,300 1,300 rl d Generator Improvement Program 1,000 1,000 > Miscellaneous Water 800 500 500 500 500 1,050 3,850 PLC Upgrades 35 35 35 35 35 35 210 Reservoir Maintenance and Improvements 500 500 500 500 500 750 3,250 Q. Rock Creek Mitigation Projects 500 500 E Security Improvements perVA 50 50 50 50 50 50 300 ' 0 V SR516/Covington Way 500 1,000 1,500 Tacoma Intertie-Ongoing Capital 50 50 50 50 500 2,500 3,200 M c Transmission Easements 50 50 50 50 50 50 300 z 0 UPRR Hanger Replacement 50 600 650 , c Wapato Creek 509 AlexanderAvenue 50 200 100 350 Water Meter Replacement Program 2,600 1,600 4,200 G1 = Water System Plan Update 400 400 800 _ V Watermain Replacements/Repairs 1,535 450 2,465 500 500 1,065 6,515 0 Well Rehabilitation 200 400 400 300 400 400 2,100 a West Hill Booster Pump Station 1,400 400 1,800 as N West Hill Transmission Main 1,650 1,650 M Total Water Supply&Distribution 9,000 7,500 7,365 6,985 7,535 6,900 45,285 d U Sewer >, r Horseshoe Acres Pump Station 1,000 2,500 1,000 1,000 5,500 U Linda Heights Pump Station 1,785 1,000 2,785 Q� Miscellaneous Pump Station Rehab 75 75 250 500 500 500 1,900 Miscellaneous Sewer 500 500 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 4,500 29t Sewer Main Replacements/Relining 140 425 750 1,000 2,000 2,000 6,315 W Tree Root Removal 50 50 50 50 50 50 300 � Total Sewer 3,550 3,550 3,550 3,550 3,550 3,550 21,300 E t 0 r a Packet Pg. 37 6.D.b CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM E UTILITIES CONTINUED-in thousands 2 O N N Q 2024 20251 127 2028 2029 C R Stormwater Management aa) 267th Culvert $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000 $ - $ - $ 1,000 E 81stAve Pump Station 600 250 1,900 250 3,000 0) Drainage Property Maintenance 200 200 200 200 200 200 1,200 E Q GRNRA Pump Station North 3,000 5,000 8,000 GRNRA Security&Maintenance 50 500 500 500 500 2,050 m KentAirport Levee 500 100 600 m Lake Meridian Estate Outfall 1,000 1,000 W N Mill Creek Culvert Maintenance 250 250 250 250 250 250 1,500 Mill Creek Rehabilitation 4,280 2,350 2,050 2,350 11,030 Misc Environmental Projects 50 50 50 50 50 250 LL • Miscellaneous Drainage 300 600 900 North Fork Meridian ValleyCulvert 500 500 1,000 C Pipe Replacements/RoadwayImprovements 1,000 950 500 950 2,050 - 5,450 U Total Stormwater Management 6,730 6,050 6,050 6,050 6,050 6,050 36,980 M a as Total Utilities Projects $ 19,280 $ 17,100 $ 16,965 $ 16,585 $ 17,135 $ 16,500 $ 103,565 y c m • d L E O U O t c O s� C • L d 11 LU CD N CO) d U r U I Q X PA r _ C d t v R .r r a 14 Packet Pg. 38 6.D.b CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM :z E PUBLIC SAFETY .. 0 N N 2024 20251 127 2028 2029a C Sources of Funds Capital Resource Fund $ $ 350 $ 250 $ $ $ $ 600 m Total Sources of Funds 350 250 600 E Projects Command Post Vehicle 300 300 Q Jail Expansion 50 250 300 Total Public Safety Projects $ $ 350 $ 250 $ $ $ $ 600 d W N N LL .Q — U c c� a a� .y C d t N L E • �Qrn V �L • 1.1 a o� N M • d U V I Q t X W • d E EL v R .r r a Packet Pg. 39 6.D.c PUGET SOUND Professionally and • REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY compassionately helping people. INTERNATIONALLY ACC DITED FIRE AGENCY E a� r 2 0 Capital Improvement Plan Q Mitigation & Level of Service Policy (Six year update to the 2014-2033 Capital S Equipment Plan) E c as E Q r c r � E a� w m _ r LL R a� -- >_ owe- � d L E 0 _ U m t c 0 a� c ----- ------ a m w x LU 1 E t r r a Packet Pg. 40 6.D.c c� a Table of Contents E Background and Demographics............................................................................................................3 0 Contractsfor Service..............................................................................................................................4 a King County Fire District 43 (City of Maple Valley) Service Area............................................4 c City of SeaTac Service Area......................................................................................................4 m PSFPerformance Metrics.......................................................................................................................5 E Measured Components of Emergency Response.................................................................................8 Six Year Growth Projection..................................................................................................................11 Q c a� PSFLevel of Service.............................................................................................................................13 E 2 Distribution &Resource Allocation 16 W 0 m SixYear Capacity Estimate...................................................................................................................17 ' U Six Year Financing Component ...........................................................................................................18 Ui �a Capital Purchases&Expected Service Improvements 19 c� ExpectedSystem Impacts....................................................................................................................19 v c 0 Current Capital Resources Inventory ..................................................................................................20 a d Effects of New Development on Performance ...................................................................................21 c MitigationMethodology......................................................................................................................21 L Q FeeProcess ..........................................................................................................................................22 E 0 PSF Funding Share 25 v Definitions 25 0 a� Acronyms .............................................................................................................................................26 0 •L References............................................................................................................................................27 af°i x AppendixA— Fee Formula...................................................................................................................28 .2 Appendix B—Single Family Worksheet Guide....................................................................................29 a Appendix C— Multi-Family Worksheet Guide.....................................................................................30 N M Appendix D —Commercial Worksheet Guide.....................................................................................31 a W Appendix E— PSF Service Area Map....................................................................................................32 N a Appendix F— Planned Capital Purchases............................................................................................33 m Appendix G — PSF Current Facilities Inventory....................................................................................36 Appendix H — PSF Current Apparatus Inventory.................................................................................38 w c m E z U 0 r r � a Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy Packet Pg. 41 6.D.c c� a Introduction E 2 This Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is an annual rolling six-year update of the Puget Sound Regional Fire o Authority(PSF) 2014—2033 Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan (Master Plan). The Mitigation and Level of Q Service Policy is also integrated into this document. This plan addresses six core elements;and complies with the requirements of the Growth Management Act (GMA), RCW, and local ordinances.The goal of this Plan is to c r set a Level of Service, identify the next six years of community growth, determine the need for additional capital resources, and prepare a six-year funding plan.This plan also provides guidance for the determination c of impacts from growth and development;and establishes appropriate fees. E Q The Cities of Covington, Kent, and Tukwila find that the GMA requires that new growth and development should pay a proportionate share of the cost of new facilities needed to serve the new growth and E a� development. All three cities assess fire impact fees to promote orderly growth and development.The W financing for system improvements to serve new development must provide for a balance between impact m r fees and other sources of public funds; and cannot rely solely on impact fees. U W W This Plan identifies: .Q c� • PSF Demographics U� IL • PSF adopted Level of Service over the next six years .y c • Six-Year Growth Projections m L Q • Six-Year Funding Plan to meet projected capital needs E 0 U • Expected System Impacts from future capital improvements c 0 • Current Inventory of existing capital resources a� c •L Background and Demographics IL PSF is an independent special purpose district formed under chapter 52.26 RCW providing fire and emergency a; services to nearly 118 square miles of urban and rural area.The City of Kent and King County Fire Protection M District No. 37, which includes the city of Covington,joined to form the original Regional Fire Authority in a 2010.The City of SeaTac entered a contractual consolidation with PSF in 2014, Maple Valley Fire entered a contractual consolidation with PSF in 2018.The City of Tukwila entered in a contractual consolidation with PSF a i in 2023, and then annexed into PSF on January 1, 2024.The PSF service area includes the cities of Covington, m Kent, Maple Valley, SeaTac, and Tukwila, as well as unincorporated areas of King County within Fire Districts 37 and 43. Services are delivered 24-hours per day, 365 days per year by career firefighters and support staff. x W Services delivered by PSF include fire suppression,fire prevention, code enforcement, fire investigation; m E z U 0 r r � Q ��� Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy Packet Pg. 42 6.D.c c� emergency and non-emergent medical services (medical), hazardous materials response, specialized rescue, E emergency management, community risk reduction, and community relations. r Generally, PSF's service area borders Renton and Seattle to the north,the Cascade foothills to the east, Auburn o to the south and Burien, Des Moines, and Federal Way to the west. PSF serves an estimated population of Q 264,169. r This update utilizes the service standards adopted by PSF in its Community Risk Assessment/Standard of Cover E (CRA/SOC) document which is incorporated herein by reference.The CRA/SOC is required by the Center for Public Safety Excellence (CPSE) as part of the Accreditation process.These standards are used to identify gaps E in service and guide capital resource planning to address identified gaps.The goal is to sustain and/or improve Q current services while addressing the service impacts of new development and community growth.The a0i resources identified in this six-year plan work toward implementing the deployment strategies identified in the 2 Master Plan, and CRA/SOC. N m r See Appendix E for a Map of PSF Service Area. U u_ �a Contracts for Service �- U King County Fire District 43 (City of Maple Valley) Service Area a d Starting on October 1, 2018, PSF provides fire-based services to King County Fire District#43 (FD43)through .y a contract for service.The FD43 area covers approximately 50.86 square miles. It includes the City of Maple Valley, the Hobart area, the Ravensdale area, and a large unincorporated area of rural land. FD43 and the City L a of Maple Valley has an estimated population of 44,537. E 0 U Six fire stations are owned by FD43.Three stations are currently unstaffed volunteer stations that remain part of FD43.The other three stations are operated by PSF under the service contract. Most other capital resources o previously owned by Maple Valley prior to 2018 have been transferred to the ownership of PSF. As a condition of the service contract, FD43 continues to fund fire stations and provides an annual capital payment to PSF to a� assist funding other resource needs. _ City of SeaTac Service Area a Starting on January 1, 2014, PSF provides fire-based services to the City of SeaTac through a contract for am service.SeaTac covers approximately 7.67 square miles surrounding the Port of Seattle Airport and has an ti estimated population of 31,910. Q u_ Two fire stations owned by SeaTac are leased and operated by PSF under the service contract. All other capital c a resources have been transferred to the ownership of PSF.As a condition of the service contract, SeaTac mi provides an annual capital payment to PSF for funding the equipment that was transferred but has retained responsibility for the capital costs of fire stations. x w c m E z U 0 r r � Q Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy Packet Pg. 43 6.D.c c� a PSF Performance Metrics E 2 Time is the critical metric to evaluate. In setting response goals, PSF looks at two timeframes, one for Fire and o one for Medical. For Fire, the key is time to Flashover.The need to arrive prior to Flashover is critical to life and a property preservation. For Medical, the measure is time to "brain death."The need to arrive prior to brain death is critical to meaningful recovery from a medical event.This is often measured in resuscitation success c rates for cardiac events. For medical events involving trauma,the time to delivery at a Trauma Center is key. E Essentially, the quicker we are,the better the outcomes. m E Flashover a Flashover is the most dangerous time in fire growth.As a fire grows within a room, its radiant heat is absorbed by the contents of the room heating the combustible gases and objects to their ignition point until finally the entire room bursts into flame, spreading outside of the room involved. N m r U li T E O m s x ti. O L Over the past 50 years,fire engineers agree that the replacement of wood and other natural products with 2 plastics and synthetic materials for interior furnishings has resulted in increased fuel loads, higher fire a temperatures, and decreased time to flashover, making quick response more important than ever. Flashover am can typically occur from less than four to beyond 10 minutes after free burning starts depending upon the air ti supply available to the fire. a u_ Once flashover occurs, it is no longer possible for survival in the room of flashover. Not even firefighters in y complete protective gear can survive the intense heat of flashover.A post-flashover fire burns hotter and ml moves faster, making search and rescue more difficult and riskier in the remainder of the structure. Once flashover occurs more firefighters are needed to deal with the much larger and growing fire problem. x w Fire growth occurs exponentially;that is,fire doubles in size every minute of free burn that is allowed. Factors m that determine when flashover may occur include the type of fuel,the arrangement of the fuels, room size, E U r r � a ��� Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy Packet Pg. 44 6.D.c c� and so on. Because these factors vary, the exact time to flashover cannot be predicted, making quick response E and rapid-fire attack the best way to control fire, protect life, and reduce fire loss. r Flashover and fire spread can be mitigated.The table below shows the progression of fire and which o timeframes can be managed by the fire department, and which cannot. The elapsed time from fire ignition to Q fire reporting varies but can be indirectly managed using monitored fire alarms and suppression systems to help mitigate the growth of fire.These systems can automatically report the presence of a fire to a dispatch c center. If all structures were equipped with a monitored fire alarm and automatic fire sprinkler system, E dispatch time would be reduced.This would allow firefighters to arrive at the scene when fires are smaller and more easily controlled. E Q c a� • • 1 • 2 w 0 m r FIRE GRG ESTAWYH This diagram illustrates of smoke�l. offire dudes o red V Ad.1—rk i how in home firm in rhidi fC C�1W LW�, C�nr k4— ..d d fire growth over time and u_ the sequence of events r�ewpng devease signi6untly }' that may occur from Q. S KE RE&mEWU& MA LMAL HRERGUERSOVEN fC MAM SPRINREER S NRLER �HOSENOIDS ignition to suppression. U MTEIRDFS AcnVAM AOIIRHES Imp Depending on the size of room,contents of the a HRE GROWTH QI RLPRH:LED room,and available > y rIRECRotinx � oxygen,flashover can � RESfIRi;l® occur in less than two or � more than 10 minutes. DISPArw - Q Flashover occurs most E frequently between four 0 U and 10 minutes. m it A NORTHERN ILL[NOLS 0 AREIN5PECPORS A., ASSMATIOY 0) C L V As the above exhibit illustrates, properly maintained and functioning fire sprinkler systems in both residential and commercial occupancies help control a fire before the arrival of firefighting resources. Automatic fire a sprinklers can control fire and buy firefighters significant time toward saving lives and minimizing loss from N ti fire. r� Q u_ a i m ..r x w c m E z U r r � Q Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy Packet Pg. 45 6.D.c c� Brain Death E E The delivery of emergency medical services (EMS) by first responders is also time critical for many types of injuries and events. If a person has a heart attack and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is started within 2 U four minutes, that person's chances of leaving the hospital alive are four times greater than if they did not 0 receive CPR until after four minutes. Q c r c m CPR begun in Survival 4 minutes or less rate Q C N CPR begun more Survival E than 4 minutes rate N after arrest W to d r O 1 00/0 20% 30% 400/6 ILL Saa i-vrvol Role ofHeo tAttack Victims When CPA Is Available .Q fC V C R Chances of survival are increased with the intervention of a cardiac defibrillator. All PSF staff are trained to use li and carry cardiac defibrillators.The exhibit below shows the survival rate of a heart attack patient with CPR and > defibrillation. c a� m L Q E Response Time / Intervention vs. Survival 0 L 60 � N SO = 40 2 30 7 30 d 0 � N O M Time Varies EMS Rasa Time ILL r Detection N 9 of -1-1 F . . . . to al Collapse Scene Interventionm Unmanageable Tlme Some Manogablo Time Time W c m E z U r r � Q Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy Packet Pg. 46 6.D.c c� a Measured Components of Emergency Response E 2 There are several components that make up PSF"response"time.The timeline starts with the activation of the 0 911 system (a call to dispatch) and stops with the arrival at the scene of the incident. It is important to also a consider the time needed for access and set up. r c Alarm Processing Time:Amount of time that it takes to receive and process an emergency call.This includes E (1) receiving the call, (2) determining what the emergency is, (3)verifying where the emergency is located, (4) '0 m determining what resources and fire department units are required to handle the call, and (5) notifying the fire E department units that are to respond.This is handled through Valley Communications (PSF Dispatch Center). a� E Turnout Time:The time from when fire department units are first notified of an emergency to the beginning W point of travel time.This includes discontinuing and securing the activity firefighters were involved in at time 0 of dispatch, traveling by foot to their apparatus, donning appropriate personal protective equipment and U taking a seat-belted position on the apparatus to respond. ,i �a Travel Time:The time that starts when the wheels of a response apparatus/vehicle begin to roll towards an emergency incident and ends when wheels of the response vehicle stop rolling upon arrival at the address of the emergency scene. a a� Access Time:Amount of time required for the crew to move from where the apparatus stops at the address of c as an emergency incident,to where the actual emergency exists.This can include moving to the interior or upper L stories of a large building and dealing with any barriers such as locked gates, stairways, elevators, doors, or Q- E other restrictions that may slow access to the area of the emergency. U m t Setup Time: For fires,the amount of time required for fire department units to set up, connect hose lines, c 0 position ladders, and prepare to extinguish the fire.Setup time includes disembarking the fire apparatus, a� c placing hose lines, charging hose lines, donning self-contained breathing apparatus, making entry into the building, and applying water.The opportunity for saving time during setup is minimal, even for trained = personnel. For Medical, the amount of time required for fire fighters to don personal protective equipment .2 73 (mask,gowns,gloves, etc.), access the patient, deploy lifesaving equipment such as defibrillators, oxygen a masks, and/or other medical gear. a; N ti M Response Time:Adding Alarm Time,Turnout Time, and Travel Time together, provides the Response Time. a Access Time is currently not tracked, and therefore not a part of"Response Time." Response Time standards expect the adopted times to be performed at least nine out of every 10 times from receipt of a 9-1-1 call to a the arrival of fire and EMS resources. m� x w c m E z U 0 r r � a Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy Packet Pg. 47 6.D.c c� a Dr. Lori Moore-Merrell wrote an article on Understanding and Measuring Fire Department Response Times'. E Dr. Moore-Merrell's article states that there are three basic components of fire department emergency response performance: U 0 • Availability—The degree to which the resources are ready and available to respond. Q c • Capability—The abilities of deployed resources to manage an incident. r c m • Operational Effectiveness—A product of availability and capability. It is the outcome achieved by the E deployed resources or the ability to match resources deployed to the risks to which they are responding. E Q NFPA 1710:Standard for the Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, Emergency Medical Operations, and Special Operations to the Public by Career Fire Departments establishes criteria that provide a aEi standard for comparison: w m r Alarm Answering Time: 15 seconds for 95%of calls;40 seconds for 99%of calls. U u_ Alarm Processing Time: 64 seconds for 90%of calls; 106 seconds for 95%of calls. a c� Turnout Time: 60 seconds (1 Minute) for Medical. v c 0 80 seconds (1 Minute and 20 seconds)for Fire. a a� Travel Time — Medical — Basic Life Support (BLS): 240 seconds (4 minutes) or less for the arrival of a unit with first responder or higher-medical certification capability at an emergency medical incident. L Q Travel Time — Medical -Advanced life support (ALS):480 seconds (8 minutes) or less for the arrival of an c advanced life support unit at an emergency medical incident, where the service is provided by the fire v m department. c 0 Travel Time — Fire - First Engine Arrive on Scene Time: 240 seconds (4 minutes)for 90%of responses with c a minimum staffing of four personnel. c� a� Travel Time — Fire -Second Company Arrive on Scene Time: 360 seconds (6 minutes)for 90% of responses with a minimum staffing of four personnel. a Travel Time — Fire - Initial Full Alarm— Low and Medium Hazard Assembly Time:480 seconds (8 minutes) a, on 90%of responses. M Travel Time — Fire - Initial Full Alarm— High Hazard/High-Rise Assembly Time: 610 seconds (10 minutes 10 seconds) on 90%of responses. y a I m x w c m E https://www.lexipol.com/resources/blog/understanding-and-measuring-fire-department-response-times/ v r r � Q Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy Packet Pg. 48 6.D.c c� Although NFPA 1710 provides essential benchmarks, PSF measures baseline performance in terms of total E response time,which is the time it takes from the call to be received at Valley Communications Center(Alarm) until the first unit arrives on the scene of the emergency incident.Total response time should be measured U and reported for all first-due units and the effective response force (ERF) assembly.Total response time is N composed of call-processing time, turnout time, and travel time: a c Alarm time—the elapsed time from the call being received to the dispatching of the first unit. m E Turnout time—the elapsed time from when a unit is dispatched until that unit changes their status to "responding." E Q Travel time—the elapsed time from when a unit begins to respond until its arrival on the scene. E 2 NFPA Standard 1710 w m PSF relies on nationally recognized standards published by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). r NFPA is a global self-funded organization, established in 1896, devoted to eliminating death, injury, property, U and economic loss due to fire, electrical, and related hazards. u_Ua .Q c� Fire call v c o First-in:= (Alarm =1:00+Turnout= 1:20 +Travel =4:00) = 6:20 M IL o Full alarm: (Alarm = 1:00 +Turnout= 1:20+Travel =8:00) = 10:20 .y c Medical — Basic &Advanced Life Support Services m o First-in:= (Alarm =1:00+Turnout= 1:00 +Travel =4:00) = 6:00 a o Full Alarm:= (Alarm =1:00+Turnout= 1:00+Travel = 8:00) = 10:00 0 U m t Along with using the national standards published by the NFPA, PSF uses several other resources to determine the best industry practices.The Center for Public Safety Excellence is a not-for-profit corporation that helps ° a� high-performing fire departments and emergency services professionals in their efforts to continuously L improve. CPSE does Fire Department Accreditation, Fire and Emergency Services professional Credentialing, and offers Education Programs on contemporary fire and emergency services"Best Practices." CPSE is a consortium of the International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC), International Association of Fire a Fighters (IAFF),the International City/County Management Association (ICMA),the International Code Council N (ICC),the Insurance Services Office (ISO), the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), and the United States Fire Administration (USFA).Together this group maintains the Commission on Fire Accreditation International (CFAI) and the criteria for fire departments, like PSF, to achieve Accredited Agency Status. c a i m Critical to achieving Accredited Agency Status is an assessment of the fire department's ability to effectively deliver service.To make this assessment,the CFAI has established a methodology for determining the fire and x non-fire risks of a community, assessing the fire department's capability compared to that risk, measuring fire w department resource capacity, and guidelines for performance standards to assess overall performance of a fire department.The CFAI publishes this methodology in its Standards of Cover manual. The term Standard of z U r r � Q Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 49 6.D.c c� Cover refers to the "standard(s)"to which a fire department runs daily operations to "cover"the service area of E the fire department. r U Six Year Growth Projection N a PSF looks at the growth projections over the next six years to properly plan for capital resource needs.Along with historical growth data provided by the Office of Financial Management, PSF evaluates indications of E growth with impacts to level of service. PSF looks at the overall emergency calls for services; housing and c m population projections; and commercial development. E c The growth predictions, identified in this CIP, are evaluated for potential impacts to the PSF level of service.An E analysis of impacts to System Capacity help to predict future capital resources needed to maintain the PSF W adopted level of service post growth. System Capacity is measured by bay space for response apparatus and 0 accommodations for staffing. Essentially how many vehicles and people each station can accommodate. U CU U- System Capacity is increased by adding apparatus and staffing to the system. PSF is constantly assessing the a response needs of our system.To address changing needs in the community PSF can re-deploy apparatus and/or increase Concentration (apparatus and staffing).System Capacity is also increased by adding additional fire stations. a a� Currently, bay space is the main limiting factor with 70%of our bay space occupied by response apparatus. c as PSF bay space in Stations with higher call volume growth are at maximum capacity. Stations with lower call L volume growth still have some capacity for adding apparatus.The PSF would need to either remodel existing Q- E facilities or build new facilities to increase bay space capacity to address predicted growth. U m t Emergency Calls for Services c 0 Emergency incidents continue to increase each year commensurate with growth. Notable increases can be a� c seen in the cities of Covington, Maple Valley, and Tukwila.All PSF areas have experienced a steeper increase in 2021 and 2022 leading to higher overall call volumes. _ 5-Year Annual Incident Count 0 a 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 5 year Change N Covington 1,618 1,635 1,644 1,848 2,126 31% M FD37 498 511 516 579 615 23% LL Q FD43 1,096 1,203 1,281 1,229 1,263 15% Kent 17,844 18,244 17,720 19,402 20,820 17% a Maple Valley 1,508 1,572 1,561 1,859 1,936 28% m Tukwila 5,734 5,979 5,284 6,869 7,527 31% t SeaTac 4,658 4,840 4,690 5,452 5,430 17% w TOTAL r 32,956 r 33,984 32,696 r 37,238 r 39,717 21% m E z U 0 r r � a ��1Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 50 6.D.c c� Population Growth Projections E According to the Office of Financial Management,the State of Washington population, as of April 1, 2022, is estimated to be 7,864,400.Washington State population increased by 97,425 people (from births, deaths, and 2 U net migration)from the 2020 census adjusted base.The crude population growth rate is 1.3%, almost 0.5% N more than last year.As expected, the COVID-19 crisis still affected the 2022 estimates. Migration continues to a be the primary driver behind population growth. From 2021 to 2022, net migration (people moving in minus people moving out)to Washington totaled 83,300,which is up 40,500 people since 2021. Net migration accounted for 85%of the state's population growth,with natural increase (births minus deaths) responsible E for the other 15%.This discrepancy- net migration at 85%- is the largest in the last three decades. E Q "Vision 2050" is a four-county regional plan created by the Puget Sound Regional Council.The plan identifies Kent, SeaTac, and Tukwila as "Core Cities." Core Cities are targeted to accommodate 28%of the regional E population growth and 35%of employment growth.Vision 2050 identifies Covington and Maple Valley as W "Cities and Towns." Covington, along with this group of"Cities and Towns," is targeted to accommodate 6% of m r the regional population growth and 4%of employment growth. The King County Countywide Planning Policies =U call for the following amount of new residential units by 2044: 10,200 units in Kent, 5,900 units in SeaTac, ,l 6,500 units in Tukwila, 4,310 units in Covington, and 1,720 units in Maple Valley. .Q c� Housing Unit Growth Projections Housing, another indicator of population change, remained strong in 2022. Housing in 2022 increased by a 1.4%over the previous year.Washington added 46,500 housing units last year.This decade begins with annual housing change exceeding the previous decade average of 31,500 housing units. Statewide, 58%of all new housing units in 2022 were associated with multi-family structures. L Q E Locally, housing is projected to grow at varying rates in the PSF area. King County Fire District#37 (FD37), U FD43, Kent, and SeaTac all have projected housing growth rates of around 1%annually over the next six years. The City of Covington has a projected growth rate of 3.5%,the City of Maple Valley 4.5%, and the City of o Tukwila at 5.2%annually over the next six years. For Fire Impact Fee purposes, we project the housing unit increase to be 16,253 units in Covington, Kent, and Tukwila. a� x July 1, 2022 2029 Projected 2022 Estimated 2029 Projected 2 Population Population Housing Units Housing Units a Covington 21,200 22,908 7,398 9,085 N FD37 6,002 6,486 2,159 2,258 FD43 15,617 16,875 5,824 6,038 Q u_ W Kent 137,900 149,012 49,732 53,326 N a Maple Valley 28,920 31,250 9,856 12,807 m� SeaTac 31,910 34,481 11,851 12,324 Tukwila 22,620 24,443 9,198 12,479 w TOTAL 1264,169 1285,456 196,018 1108,317 E U � Q ��� Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 51 6.D.c c� Commercial Growth Projections— New Construction E For Fire Impact Fee purposes,we project the increase in commercial square footage to be 13,206,735 square feet.We use the 2035 average minus the Actual growth to get the estimated figure. o Q c Commercial Growth Projections (Square Feet of Commercial Space) r c m 2023 E Low Estimate High Estimate Average 2022 63,680,770 63,775,019 63,727,895 Actual Q 2029 62,832,531 Low Estimate High Estimate Average 2 w 69,239,674 70,527,487 69,883,580 Formula Factor 2035 13,206,735 �= U Low Estimate High Estimate Average ,i 74,798,578 77,279,954 76,039,266 1 +° .Q cU U The pattern of growth and estimates of future impacts on service demand remain consistent with the Master Plan for the PSF service area.As a result of this evaluation,the projected population growth, new dwelling a units, and commercial square footage estimates used in calculating impact fees remain consistent as used in .y previous versions. m L PSF Level of Service E 0 U t Chapter 52.33 RCW requires substantially career fire departments (paid staff)to establish Level of Service o (LOS) policies and performance objectives based on the arrival of first responders with defibrillation equipment prior to brain death and the arrival of adequate fire suppression resources prior to flashover. This law recognizes NFPA Standard 1710 and the Commission on Fire Accreditation International's (CFAI) Standard = of Cover as bases for this statute and requires a 90% performance expectation of the established LOS. 0 a Time is a critical issue and is carefully measured to evaluate performance in the fire service. PSF responses are o, N divided into two categories— Fire or Medical. Each has important time benchmarks that directly correlate to outcomes.The quicker trained personnel access the emergency,the better the outcomes. Q U- Fire can expand at a rate many times its volume per minute.A quick response is critical for the rescue of ai occupants and the application of extinguishing agents to minimize loss.The time segment between fire m ignition and the start of fire suppression activities has a direct relationship to fire loss. Medical Survival rates, for some types of medical emergencies, are dependent upon rapid intervention by trained emergency medical w personnel.The quicker medical interventions are initiated,the better the patient outcomes. m E z U 0 r r � Q ��� Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 52 6.D.c c� PSF maintains a "Community Risk assessment/Standard of Cover"document as part of their accreditation E process through the CPSE.The CRA/SOC is the "Standard"or Level of Service (LOS)to which the fire department will deliver services to the community. Performance below benchmark standards can contribute 2 U to unnecessary property and life loss.The continuum of time of fire service performance to adopted level of N service standard includes three main components measured at the 90th percentile (nine out of 10 times) of a performance. c r c Each standard is divided into Urban and Rural; Fire and Medical;then further divided into Low, Moderate, and E High-Risk categories.The first standard is for the First Unit to arrive.The second standard is for the First Alarm, or Effective Response Force (ERF) to arrive.An ERF refers to the number of resources and personnel needed to Q effectively provide fire or emergency medical services capable of mitigating the incident. The number of resources making up an ERF varies by type of emergency and level of risk. E a� w The first unit to arrive can begin to render aid or perform other necessary tasks as a component of an ERF but m r cannot resolve the incident alone.The ERF for life threatening medical calls requires two or more resources. _U The ERF for a structure fire requires five or more resources.The additional resources of the ERF must respond ,l from greater distances than the first-in resource,therefore;the first-in and ERF have separate performance expectations. U c ° First unit arrival objectives: 90% performance expectation. a d Urban Service Area c as m L Q Low Risk c U o Fire m t Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:55) +Travel Time (5:35) =8:40 o Medical ° a� Alarm (1:30) +Turnout(1:45) +Travel Time (10:15) = 13:30 ° a� x Moderate Risk o Fire ° IL Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:55) +Travel Time (4:35) = 7:40 o Medical ti M Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:45) +Travel Time (4:35) = 7:30 Q u_ High Risk a o Fire m� Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:55) +Travel Time (4:35) = 7:40 o Medical x w Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:45) +Travel Time (4:35) = 7:30 c m E z U ° r r � Q Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 53 6.D.c c� Rural Service Area _E E a� r 2 U 0 Low Risk Q o Fire c Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:55) +Travel Time (7:35) = 10:00 o Medical E E Alarm (1:30) +Turnout(1:45) +Travel Time (13:15) = 16:30 E Q Moderate and High Risk o Fire 0 E Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:55) +Travel Time (6:30) =9:35 W o Medical m r Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:45) +Travel Time (6:30) =9:25 =U W u_ �a Full first alarm arrival objectives: 90% performance expectation. U c Urban Service Area a a� .y c Low Risk m o Fire Q- Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:55) +Travel Time (7:55) = 10:00 0 o Medical m Alarm (1:30) +Turnout(1:45) +Travel Time (8:35) = 11:50 0 a� Moderate Risk 0•L o Fire x Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:55) +Travel Time (12:55) = 16:00 2 o Medical a Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:45) +Travel Time (6:20) =9:15 am N ti M High Risk Q o Fire u_ W Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:55) +Travel Time (17:35) = 20:40 a o Medical m� Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:45) +Travel Time (6:20) =9:15 x w c m E z U 0 r r � Q Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 54 6.D.c c� a E Rural Service Area r 2 U 0 Low Risk Q o Fire c Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:55) +Travel Time (9:55) = 12:00 o Medical E E Alarm (1:30) +Turnout(1:45) +Travel Time (13:05) = 16:20 E Q Moderate and High Risk o Fire — Hydrant Supply E Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:55) +Travel Time (14:55) = 18:00 W o Fire —Tender Supply m r Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:55) +Travel Time (15:55) = 19:00 =U o Medical f° u_ Alarm (1:10) +Turnout(1:45) +Travel Time (8:20) = 11:15 .Q c� v c 0 King County Standards a The King County Comprehensive Plan and Countywide Planning Policies are based on the concept of concurrency and require that adequate facilities and services be available or be made available to serve development as it occurs.The County Comprehensive Plan recognizes the validity of using a response time L analysis in determining appropriate service levels and recognizes the central role of fire protection districts Q- E and regional fire authorities in providing those services. However, King County has not adopted any fire U service response standards. c 0 Local Response Standards City of Covington, Kent, and Tukwila—Adopts PSF Standards City of Maple Valley-Standards set out in Contract for Services (Interlocal Agreement) _ City of SeaTac—Standards set out in Contract for Services (Interlocal Agreement) .2 King County Fire Protection District No. 37 —Adopts PSF Standards a King County Fire Protection District No.43 -Standards set out in Contract for Services (Interlocal Agreement) a, N ti M Distribution & Resource Allocation Q u_ a Fire stations and resources are strategically located throughout PSF to serve the community. Each fire station m� can accommodate varying levels of fire resources (Capacity). Ideally,the capacity of each fire station should be commensurate with the demand of the surrounding service area. For example, areas with a high service w demand will have fire stations with higher capacity levels.The capacity of a fire station is increased by adding m E z U 0 r r OPuget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 55 6.D.c c� fire resources such as fire engines, ladder trucks, aid cars, specialty equipment, and trained staff. The limiting E factors for capacity are bay space and dorms. r U System failure begins to occur when the demand for resources is increased to a point where simultaneous 0 requests for a resource begins to commonly occur.When service demand exceeds a fire station's capacity, a a resource from a fire station further away must respond in its place.The result of this situation is referred to as "Cascading Failure."The failure of one resource to be available to answer emergency calls cascades to the next closest fire station resource, leaving two service areas impacted when the covering resource vacates its E assigned area to make up for lack of capacity of the failing resource area.This effect continues with a ripple effect to other fire stations and jurisdictions. E Q c Cascading Failure causes longer travel times to reach emergency scenes and outcomes are affected. Longer E 2 travel times make it less likely that those resources can arrive prior to the negative outcomes of flashover and W brain death.The solution to Cascading Failure is the addition of service capacity to the area experiencing high m r demand.The cost of adding resources must be balanced with the community expectation of service levels. _U Lower response times will have higher costs due to the increase in resources needed to provide that service ,l I eve I. .Q c� U Six Year Capacity Estimate IL a� PSF looks at the demand on resources when evaluating future System Capacity needs. We look at Reliability c as and Unit Hour Utilization. Reliability, in this context, is how often PSF units arrived first to an incident in their L assigned response area. In other words, the unit is available (not on another emergency call)to respond to Q- E that emergency incident.When units are busy,they are less likely to be available to respond to calls in their U response area. Reliability levels below the adopted performance expectation indicate resource exhaustion. PSF's ability to meet its response time standards is directly affected by resource reliability. c 0 a� c Unit Hour Utilization (UHU) measures, in hourly time periods,the on-duty time consumed by emergency activities.The percentage of time on an emergency incident versus the time available for dispatch creates the = UHU Percentage measurement. These percentages were then compared to a scale based on CPSE's threshold .2 of 90%. Meaning that a unit is available 90%of the time when an incident occurs in their assigned response a area. For UHU, PSF uses historical incident data broken down to an hour-by-hour view of the percentage that a; each unit(e.g. E371 and A371), and various groupings of M units (e.g. Sta. 71 units), arrived first to incidents that Unit Hour Utilization a occurred within their assigned response area. 0 -4.9% Extremely Under 5 - 9.9% Under a i 10 - 14.9% Optimal m .. 15 - 19.9% High x 20 - 24.9% Very High W 25 - 29.9% Over 30%+ Extremely Over z U 0 r r � Q Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 56 6.D.c c� PSF sets a target UHU of Optimal/High Use (10 to 20%) for our system.This allows for the balance of financial E resources and maintaining concurrence during growth. CPSE standards indicate that UHU rates in the very high range (20—24.9%) can lead to personnel burnout issues and negatively impact response performance. 2 U UHU rates in the Extremely Under range are not financially efficient. N Q The six-year capacity estimate for PSF shows a need to address Station 75 in Covington, and Stations 71, 72, 73, 74, and 77 in Kent.Adjustments made to response areas in 2023, has all four stations in Tukwila within our set UHU range or below.Two new fire stations in Kent are in the planning stages and will be online within the E next six-year window.These new stations will add capacity to help to keep system wide UHU within range. m E Q Six Year Financing Component E 2 w As growth occurs,the demand for PSF services continues to also grow.Without increasing system capacity,the m level of service will decline.This will lead to steadily increasing response times unless strategies for additional ' resources, and the staffing they require, can be funded. �i �a The Master Plan identified the need for more than $92 million in capital investments to maintain fire service Q. c� concurrency through 2033. A previous update explored two options to reduce the near-term cost of capital. v c First, less expensive alternatives to some resources identified in the Master Plan have been chosen. Next, life 2 a cycles of apparatus have been modified providing additional resale value to apparatus. However, escalating construction costs and inflationary increases have outpaced those savings and increased the overall capital funding need. m L Q The additional cost associated with PSF's portion of funding construction of 72nd Ave South, and the cost of c maintaining the apparatus and equipment transferred from SeaTac and Maple Valley has been added into the v m total capital costs established in the Master Plan. Combined with the cost saving measures associated with the new apparatus life cycle plan,the current cost of the total Master Plan has increased from $92.4 million to 0 $114.5 million in 2023.The largest portion of this increase comes from hard construction costs of needed fire c L stations. f° a� x Capital Resource purchases are organized in five general categories:Apparatus, Equipment, Facilities, Information Technology, and Infrastructure.A detailed list of planned purchases in the next six years for each a category can be found in Appendix F.The table below identifies the capital expenses to be incurred this cycle N bas ed upon the current priorities and levels of service. Q u_ a i m x w c m E z U r r � Q Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 57 6.D.c c� CL PSF Capital Resource Planned Purchases E E Six Year Plan Expenses Resource Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 TOTAL U 0 Apparatus Purchases $ 5,791,000 $ 4,686,000 $ 4,303,500 $ 3,283,500 $ 2,546,000 $ 2,281,000 $ 22,891,OOC N Equipment Purchases $ 488,644 $ 372,519 $ 761,135 $ 653,058 $ 688,700 $ 883,008 $ 3,847,064 Facilities Purchases $ 1,250,490 $ 1,274,580 $ 1,045,725 $ 585,825 $ 498,225 $ 498,225 $ 5,153,07C IT Purchases $ 427,050 $ 470,850 $ 563,925 $ 509,175 $ 465,375 $ 684,375 $ 3,120,75C Infrastructure Purchases $ 6,701,400 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,701,40C m E TOTAL $ 14,658,584 $ 6,803,949 $ 6,674,285 $ 5,031,558 $ 4,198,300 $ 4,346,608 $ 41,713,284 c Revenue Sources 0 E Resource Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 TOTAL Q c $ 5,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,000,OOC E General Fund Transfer to Capital 2 Impact Fees(Covington) $ 1,142,000 $ 1,187,680 $ 1,205,495 $ 1,223,578 $ 1,272,521 $ 1,323,422 $ 7,354,695 N Impact Fees(Kent) $ 2,346,000 $ 2,381,190 $ 2,416,908 $ 1,241,931 $ 1,260,560 $ 1,279,469 $ 10,926,058 a Impact Fees(Tukwila) $ 300,000 $ 309,000 $ 318,270 $ 327,818 $ 337,653 $ 347,782:K 1,940,523 TOTAL rs 8,488,000 $ 3,568,870 $ 3,622,403 $ 2,465,509 $ 2,533,081 $ 2,602,890 $ 23,280,753 Ui �a .Q c� V Capital Purchases & Expected Service Improvements a a� .y PSF continues to work with suppliers as we emerge from the COVID pandemic. PSF has strategically placed as orders for fire apparatus to ensure delivery dates that will help maintain concurrency. PSF aggressively looks L for opportunities to relieve the long delays due to supply chain congestion.An example is the recent Q' E agreement to purchase available Brush Trucks that were part of a cancelled order from another jurisdiction. U This allowed the PSF to get needed wildland resources available for deployment two to three years earlier than previously planned. o a� c PSF has two new fire station projects underway.The land acquisition has been completed for both stations, a� and the construction phase is anticipated to begin shortly.These two stations will serve the central portion of = PSF. Other capital resources such as fire hose, firefighting clothing, and capital IT purchases continue to be funded by annual allocations. a rn N Expected System Impacts a U- Capital Resource purchases are needed to maintain PSF's adopted level of service. In the coming year, PSF will ai continue to allocate capital funds for apparatus replacement, fire station maintenance, additional fire stations, m additional apparatus, additional staffing, and capital resource replacement consistent with adopted schedules. x w PSF call volume is expected to grow consistent with historical trends identified in this plan.The predicted growth is high in the Cities of Covington,Tukwila, and Kent. PSF expects to see a need for additional resources E z U r r 04—Z91 Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 58 6.D.c c� added to the fire stations serving those areas (increase capacity). No regional commercial projects, such as a E new airport or major shopping mall, have been proposed. r U Current Capital Resources Inventory N a Capital resources for PSF consist of fire stations, fire apparatus, staff vehicles, and equipment, that is used to provide fire and rescue services. See Appendix G &H. E c m The Public Protection Classification (PPC) is a community fire protection scoring system. This rating is a Q nationally recognized system that gives an indication of the strength of an organization's response system.The PPC score is based on a Fire Suppression Rating Schedule used by the Insurance Services Office (ISO). E Communities are rated on a PPC score from one to 10. A score of one means the community has superior w property fire protection, and 10 indicates that the area's fire protection does not meet ISO's minimum criteria. 0 Currently, Seattle Fire Department is the only organization with a PPC 1 rating in Washington State. The Cities U of Kent and Covington both have a PPC 3 rating. ,i �a Deployment of resources heavily affects the PPC rating. Essentially the PPC rating is a good indicator of proper staffing and resource levels to meet the adopted level of service for the community. Additional response stations, apparatus, and staffing would be required to pursue a better PPC score. a a� Fire Stations— PSF Service Areas Only (excluding contract areas) c a� Emergency services, for capital planning purposes, originate from 12 fire stations located throughout the L Covington/Kent/Tukwila service area(See Appendix E for Service Area Map).The average PSF fire station is over 30 years old with a capacity for three emergency response apparatus. Individual stations range in size from just v over 5,000 to more than 26,000 square feet where training facilities are included. The average size of a fire station is 12,828 square feet. Currently, only stations 71 and 74 maintain more than one front-line response c 0 apparatus with minimum staffing levels. a� c L Support Services = PSF has both standalone support facilities as well as support facilities incorporated within a fire station.Vehicle .2 73 maintenance (Fire Garage) is in three facilities throughout the area. A large administrative building in Kent a houses the South King County Fire Training Consortium, Performance Measurement, Information Technology, a; Community Relations, Finance, and the Fire Department Community Assistance and Education Services M program (FDCARES). PSF Logistics has a warehouse facility in Kent. Community Risk Reduction, Emergency a Management, and the Fire Marshal's office is in downtown Kent. Fire Stations in the PSF area host the Fire Administration, Human Resources, Health/Wellness, Chaplain Program, Facilities Division, and Fire a Investigations. See Appendix G for a detailed list of all Facilities. m� Roadway - 72"d Ave South w A notable project is a partnership with the City of Kent to complete an unfinished segment of roadway immediately north of Fire Station 76. The improved accessibility and reduction in travel times enhanced the E z U 0 r r � a Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 59 6.D.c c� coverage area for Fire Station 76. This project was finished on June 28, 2017. PSF contributed a total of$1.2 E million to complete the project. r U Effects of New Development on Performance N a New development and growth require service capacity thus eroding the reliability and overall performance of fire service resources over time. Selected mitigation measures should be relational to the risk imposed by the E development and its use.Time is the critical issue in the delivery of emergency services. E Q PSF will pursue all appropriate mitigations necessary to maintain public safety and fire service concurrency through the provisions provided by the Growth Management Act (GMA), State Environmental Protection Act E (SEPA),Washington State subdivision codes, land use regulations, and any other legally available method. W m r Mitigation Methodology CU u_ There are many options for PSF to mitigate impacts due to growth.The goal is to maintain concurrency,meaning CU that PSF resources are updated to meet the needs of the new growth and development.Acceptable mitigations may include one or more of the following options to achieve concurrency: a d Assess Fire Impact and Level of Service Fees. as m L Require installation of automatic fire sprinkler systems to provide onsite fire control until PSF response units E can arrive on scene. 0 U m t Require installation of monitored fire alarm and alerting systems to provide early alerting to PSF. 0 a� c Require installation of fire walls or other building separations to reduce fire flow. a� x Require use of alternate construction materials or design to reduce chance of fire spread between structures .2 and aid in rescue operations. 0 a rn Require installation of areas of refuge in multi-story stairwells. M Q Require installation of incident reduction features such as grab bars in housing for seniors and residents with U_ disabilities. N a i m Require installation of monitored medical alarms. x w Require installation of alarm monitored defibrillators in public areas of multi-family housing, places of c assembly, and public buildings. E z U 0 r r � Q Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 60 6.D.c c� Developer agreements may be required for all developments occurring within PSF service area when Fire E Impact or Level of Service fees alone, do not adequately mitigate the risk of the new development or ensure 0 concurrency. PSF and the development applicant may enter into a mitigation agreement that clearly identifies 2 U all mitigation necessary to maintain fire service concurrency. 0 Q All mitigation agreements between PSF and developers will be recorded as a lien against the property of the proposed development. Upon receipt of payment, PSF will promptly notify the appropriate authority having jurisdiction and remove any encumbrances recorded against the appropriate property. E c m PSF staff will determine appropriate non-fee mitigations that may be necessary in addition to Fire Impact and Q Level of Service fees to provide for adequate built-in protection or mitigations necessary for fire service concurrency to the proposed development. PSF staff will consider developer submitted alternate mitigations E a� and fee amounts presented in a study that provides acceptable alternatives to the mitigations found in this W policy. m r U Fee Process U_ Fire Impact and Level of Service fees are assessed, and typically paid, concurrent with the local jurisdiction's permitting process. The fees are paid to the local jurisdiction and then transferred to PSF via interlocal a agreements. PSF then uses those funds to maintain the adopted level of service concurrent with growth. .y c as Fire Impact& Level of Service Fees L PSF uses two basic land use categories: residential, and commercial. Residential properties include both single family and multifamily (duplex, townhome, apartments) units. Commercial property is those uses that would 0 otherwise be classified as industrial, business, retail sales, services, wholesale sales, storage, assisted care facilities, churches, medical facilities, etc. c 0 PSF's Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan identifies the resources and revenue needed to provide adequate M c service and maintain public health and safety over a 20-year planning cycle. Each year an updated Six Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is adopted.The CIP updates capital and equipment needs for the PSF.The CIP = provides projected costs and data in the next six years to be used in the calculation of Fire Impact and Level of .2 73 Service fees. ' IL rn Fee Formula Calculation M Past demand for fire department services is used to predict future service level demand. The percentage of a service use by new development and its impact on PSF Service Levels is used to determine appropriate and relational fees. Needed expenditures for capital improvements identified in PSF's Capital Facilities and a Equipment Plan will be the basis for determining the capital and equipment costs which are used in calculating CO fees. x W Impact fees are established by using a formula based upon the cost of capital needs and service demand by property type.The overall goal is to distribute the costs of growth fairly and maintain the desired level of service m E z U 0 r r � Q ��� Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 61 6.D.c c� to the community.The Systemwide Projected Capital and Equipment figure is evaluated and updated each year E commensurate with current financial conditions. Residential projects will pay the fee based on a "per unit"fee. 0 Commercial projects will pay the fee on a "per square foot" basis. 2 U 0 The fees are calculated using the distribution of incidents to Residential and Commercial properties, then a distributed again based on calls to the subcategories outlined in the formula.The Effective Response Force factor is the resources needed to effectively manage the incident, and the New Development Share proportions the fee between Impact Fees and General Funding sources.The fees are then divided over the projected growth to E render the fee. c m E Q Fire Impact Fees Where Fire Impact fees have been adopted by the Authority Having Jurisdiction, a fee will be assessed based on E a� a calculation formula found in Appendix A. The cities of Covington, Kent, and Tukwila have all adopted Fire W Impact fees. ) r U Level of Service Fees f° W In areas where Fire Impact fees have not been adopted by the authority having jurisdiction, each new development when proposed, and upon notice of application, will have their direct impacts assessed and their appropriate mitigation options determined by PSF staff.Appropriate Level of Service fees will be calculated and 0 determined by applying the formula found in Appendix A.The cities of SeaTac, King County Fire District 37,and a King County Fire District 43 have not adopted Fire Impact fees. .y c as Fee Collection m L Payment of fees will be collected by the authority having jurisdiction at time of permitting, or as defined by a Q- E required development agreement. Fire Impact or Level of Service fees will be based on the most recently U adopted formula and fees. Any fees paid later than required will be subject to interest at a rate set by the authority having jurisdiction. o a� c All fees collected by the authority havingjurisdiction will be held in separate account and transferred to PSF with interest. If Fire Impact fees are not utilized within 10 years of receipt, a refund will be issued to the developer = with interest. If a Level of Service fee is not utilized within five years of receipt, a refund will be issued to the .2 developer with interest. PSF holds these fees in a reserve account used to fund capital needs identified in the a Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan and updated in the CIP. a; N ti M Fee Exempt Properties Q Each authority having jurisdiction may provide an exemption from Fire Impact and Level of Service fees. A list of fee exempt properties can be found in the respective jurisdiction's ordinances. a, m Fee Reduction for Residential Automatic Fire Sprinkler System t A person installing a residential fire sprinkler system in a single-family home will not be required to pay the fire w operations portion of the impact fee.The Fire Impact or Level of Service Fee will be reduced by 30%for qualified sprinkler systems. E z U 0 r r � Q Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 62 6.D.c c� a E Fee Deferral Deferred collection of Impact fees for single-family residential construction may be deferred by the authority 2 U having jurisdiction. Deferring collection of the impact fee payment until final inspection; until certificate of N occupancy or equivalent certification; or until the time of closing of the first sale of the property occurring after a the issuance of the applicable building permit may be granted. r c Fee Adjustments, Exceptions, and Appeals E The standard fee may be adjusted if the developer demonstrates that the fee was improperly calculated or, m where unusual circumstances are identified by the authority having jurisdiction,the developer, or PSF staff.The E fee may be adjusted to ensure that impact fees are imposed fairly. Adjustments will be determined jointly by the authority having jurisdiction and PSF. E a� w The developer may be entitled to a credit for the value of any dedication of land for, improvements to, or new m r construction of any system improvement provided by the developer to fire protection resources identified in the =U PSF Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan. ,l �a In cases where a developer requests an independent fee calculation,adjustment,exception,or a credit pursuant to RCW 82.02.060(6), PSF's designee will consult with the authority having jurisdiction prior to making the final fee determination. a a� A developer may provide studies and data to demonstrate that any factor used by PSF may not be appropriately r_ applied to the development proposal. Any appeal about fee amounts will follow the process for appeals of the L authority having jurisdiction. Fire Impact fees may be paid under protest to obtain a building permit or a Q- E manufactured home permit. U m Multi-family Common Space Credit o Each unit in a multi-family development (Residential) will be credited 50 square feet toward common spaces c (not including commercial spaces) in other parts of residential portions of the structure. Total common spaces within the residential portion of the structure exceeding the sum of 50 square feet times the number of total = dwelling units will be assessed the per square foot fee identified in Appendix A for Commercial/Industrial .2 73 properties for each square foot of common space exceeding the credited amount. a rn N Common space credits per dwelling unit will not apply to mixed use developments where separate commercial space, and associated parking spaces are not part of the common living areas of the multi-family space. a u_ a i m x w c m E z U r r � a Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 63 6.D.c c� a PSF Funding Share E 2 There is currently an identified need for additional fire facilities and equipment in PSF related to growth that 0 occurred prior to any further development.Total funding of PSF's Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan is split a between PSF and new development. New development through Fire Impact fees or Level of Service fees will only be required to fund that share related to new growth. PSF will share in the expense of needed resources as outlined below: E E c m The percentage of capital and equipment costs beyond the growth share determined for new development. E c The actual construction and equipment costs exceeding original estimates. E 2 w The unanticipated costs associated with implementing PSF Capital Improvement Plan. r U Advancing funds for capital expenses before total collection of Fire Impact or Level of Service fee contributions. ,i �a Definitions U IL Capital Improvements: Real estate, structures, or collective equipment purchases anticipated to > have a cost of$5,000 or more and an expected useful life of at least 3 years. m Community Risk Analysis (CRA): Process to identify and prioritize local risks, followed by the a integrated and strategic investment of resources to reduce their occurrence and impact. 0 m Concentration: Deployment or spacing of resources in the PSF system. c 0 Concurrency: Adequate public facilities are available when the impacts of development occur, or c L within a specified time thereafter. Facilities and services necessary for public safety are adequate to serve new development without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards. 0 IL Distribution: Deployment or spacing of fire stations and resources in the PSF system. N ti M Level of Service (LOS): PSF's adopted response time and performance expectations. a u_ W Master Plan: Refers to the 2014 — 2033 Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Master Capital a Facilities and Equipment Plan. op� Standard of Cover:Adopted policy that determine the distribution,concentration, and reliability of x fixed and mobile response forces. w c m E z U 0 r r � a Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 64 6.D.c c� Reliability:The probability that the resources assigned to an area will be available to respond from E within that area when needed. r 2 System:The overall process of PSF to respond to the needs of the community. 0 Q System Capacity: A measurement of fire station bay space for response apparatus and 'D c accommodations for staffing.The amount of space for fire engines and firefighters. r c m E c Acronyms E a CIP: Six Year Capital Improvement Plan aEi w CFAI: Commission on Fire Accreditation International m r U CPSE: Center for Public Safety Excellence (cpse.org) �i �a CRA: Community Risk Assessment v CRA/SOC: Community Risk Assessment/Standard of Cover coo a a� ERF: Effective Response Force .y c a� FD37: King County Fire District Number 37 L a E FD43: King County Fire District Number 43 0 m GMA: Growth Management Act c 0 ISO: Insurance Services Office L PSF: Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority = LOS: Level of Service a rn SOC:Standard of Cover ti M NFPA: National Fire Protection Association U- SEPA:State Environmental Protection Act ai m x w c m E z U 0 r r � Q Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 65 6.D.c c� a References E U 0 Capital Facilities Element(WAC 365-196-415) N Q Excise Taxes (chapter 82.02 RCW) r c m Fire Impact Fees (City of Kent Code chapter 12.15) E c m Fire Impact Fee (City of Covington Code chapter 19.50) E Q c Fire Impact Fees (City of Tukwila Code chapter 16.26) E E 2 w Growth Management Act (chapter 36.70A RCW) r Office of Financial Management (ofm.wa.gov) U LL PSF Capital and Equipment Plan f° a c� U PSF Community Risk Assessment/Standard of Cover c 0 IL Vision 2050 - Puget Sound Regional Council (psrc.org/planning-2050/vision-2050) .y c a� m L Q E 0 U m t c 0 c L V N ti M Q LL N d I m .r t x Lu c m E z U 0 r r � Q Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 66 6.D.c c� rL Appendix A - Fee Formula E 2 Impact Fee Formula Calculation p Residential Effective N Systemwide Projected New Development Projected Growth N Land Use Type Capital and Equipment Share 2014-2035 Commercial Usage Factor Response Impact Fee Q Split Force '✓3 Residential Single Family $114,510,809 51% 53% 1 90% 16,253 $ 1,713.96 Per U d Multi-Family 47% 1.5 90% Units $ 2,279.89 Per U E Commercial '✓3 C Commercial 0) Industrial 20% 2.8 90% $ 2.14 Per Sc E Q Assisted Care C Hospital 18% 3 90% $ 2.06 Per Sc N Medical Facility 13,206,735 E Square Feet LLl Education $114,510,809 49% 8% 2 90% $ 0.61 Per Sc N d Assembly 10% 3 90% $ 1.15 Per Sc .0 W ILL Other Facilities @ 44% 1.1 90% $ 1.85 Per Sc }' Common Space Q fC U C Impact Fee Formula Definitions ii • Land Use Type: Defines the land use types and structures that are assessed impact fees. > .y c • System wide Capital and Equipment: The construction and equipment costs found in the PSF Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan.This cost is annually updated in the PSF Capital Improvement L a Plan. c U • Residential/Commercial Split: Percentage of annual emergency responses to each Land Use Type. c • Usage Factor:The specific use of fire services by NFIRS land use category. Use factors are based on ° a� actual incident rates to each category of Land Use Type. L • Effective Response Force Factor: The minimum amount of staffing and equipment that must reach a specific emergency location within the maximum adopted level of service time capable of fire suppression, medical and/or another incident mitigation. li rn • New Development Share: Represents the portion of Capital and Equipment costs assigned to new ti development. New Development share is used to assure that new development pays only for improvements related to growth and maintenance of fire service concurrency. • Projected Growth:The 20-year growth projections,found in PSF's Capital Facilities and Equipment al Plan and updated in PSF's Capital Improvement Plan, are the basis for PSF calculations of future m dwelling units and future square-footage of commercial projects. x • Impact Fee Amount: Represents the maximum fee to be paid by new development for each specific w property type. E z U r r � Q ��� Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 67 6.D.c c� a Appendix B - Single Family Worksheet Guide E 2 U 0 PuGtr PUGET SOUND N REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY INTERNATI0NAILLY ACCREDITED IF IRE AGENCY r c Impact Fee Calculation for New Development E c Single Family Worksheet E Q c Project Permit # E 2 Project Address: W m Project City: r U Project Parcel No. �i �a .Q Impact Fee Category (select one) U c 0 IL ❑ Single-Family $ 1,713.96 per unit > .y c as ❑ Single-Family w/Sprinkler 1 $ 1,199.77 per unit L a E 0 30% Discount for Residential Sprinkler System v m c 0 a� c �L Total Impact Fee $ _ 0 a rn N ti M Q U- N d I m .r t x w c m E z U 0 r r � Q Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 68 6.D.c c� a Appendix C - Multi-Family Worksheet Guide E U 0 PUGET SOUND REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY r INTERNATI0NAILLY ACCREDITED FIRE AGENCY a E Impact Fee Calculation for New Development E Multi-Family Worksheet Q c a� E Project Permit # w Project Address: r Project City: W u_ Project Parcel No. +° ii Impact Fee Category U Multi-Family (a) $ 2,279.89 IL a� Total Number of Residential Units (b) m L Total Common Space (SF) (c) E 0 (b) x 50 SF (Credit) (d) U m (c) - (d) Adjusted Common Space (e) Common Space Rate per SF (f) $ 1.85 0 a� Common Space Fee (e) x (f) (g) $ L (a) x (b) Impact Fees for all Units (h) $ 0 a (g) + (h) Total Impact Fees $ ti M Q LL N d I m .r t x w c m E z U 0 r r � Q Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 69 6.D.c c� a Appendix D - Commercial Worksheet Guide E 2 U 0 °EJ1 PU ET SOUND REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY r I NTE RN ATI 0 N A LLY ACCREDITED FIR':AGENCY a E Impact Fee Calculation for New Development E Commercial Worksheet Q c a� E Project Permit # w Project Address: r Project City: W U- Project Parcel No. +° a c� v Impact Fee Category (L ❑ Commercial/Industrial/Common $ 2.14 per SF ❑ Asst. Care/Hospital/Medical $ 2.06 per SF ❑ Mercantile/Education $ 0.61 per SF L ❑ Assembly $ 1.15 per SF E 0 ❑ Other Facilities/Common Space $ 1.85 per SF c) m c Impact Fee Rate (a) $ 0 a� c L Total SF of Project (b) x 0 (a) x (b) Total Impact Fees $ a rn N ti M Q LL N d I m .r t x w c m E z U 0 r r � Q Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 70 6.D.c c� a Appendix E - PSF Service Area Map U 0 co n � rr �. e r s � 0 V% m o f m m 3 n 41 A a A m [n m■ v �, Q > C 41 h Cn A � ;p T■ Y -[ N n sg d a V■ q,h—�`D N �a�. y — � wK) LL n Q m C _ z G41 � a A V■ - - Cn z CD • -� D d w > M■ u s1 d (A > co m y I u■ x n 2 L 57ND m CD arv` n n a m■ ;� ^ m T v m Ns 0 , � C o CO� ` _ a -'- 0 33 All CD 00 Cal r LO .tj _ cd x, rx N 13 uzf C� r- r nna u i x i W V Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 71 6.D.c Appendix F - Planned Capital Purchases Apparatus y in Q Apparatus Capital Resource Planned Purchases C Six Year Plan Year Resource Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 d 1995 Ford F350 XL $ 75,000 $ - $ $ $ $ a) 1995 Forklift $ - $ 50,000 $ $ $ $ C 1999 H&W(Air Truck) $ - $ - $ $ $ 200,000 $ 200,( a) 2005 Genie Scissor Lift $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ $ $ - $ Q 2005 lWells Utility Trailer $ - $ 30,000 $ $ $ $ 2005 Wells Utility Trailer $ $ 30,000 $ $ $ $ O 2005 Polaris(ATV) $ $ 15,000 $ $ $ $ N 2005 Iron Eagle Trailer $ $ 15,000 $ $ $ $ LV 2006 Top Hat(Pump Simulator) $ $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ $ $ d 2006 Ford F450 $ $ $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ $ +. 2006 Ford F450 $ $ $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ $ v 2007 Trail Blazer(WMD) $ $ $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ $ O LL 2007 Haulmark Trailer $ $ $ - $ 50,000 $ $ 2007 Freightliner Business Class M2 $ $ $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ $ 2007 Freightliner Business Class M2 $ $ $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ $ M 2012 Ford Transit Connect XLT Van $ 50,000 $ $ - $ - $ - $ V C 2012 Sutphen Tender $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,( c0 2013 International Terrastar Aid Car $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ IL 2013 International Terrastar Aid Car $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 2014 Pierce Arrow XT Fire Engine $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,( 2014 CET Fire Pump Simulator $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,( G1 2015 Ford K1 C Van $ $ $ 37,500 $ 37,500 $ $ d L 2015 Ford El Van $ $ $ 37,500 $ 37,500 $ $ G. 2015 Nissan NV200 Van $ $ $ 37,500 $ 37,500 $ $ G 2015 Nissan NV200 Van $ $ $ 37,500 $ 37,500 $ $ C) 2015 Ford Transit 350 Van $ $ $ 37,500 $ 37,500 $ $ d t 2016 Pierce Quantum Fire Engine $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 350,000 $ - $ $ 2016 Pierce Quantum Fire Engine $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 350,000 $ $ $ O 2016 Haulmark Trailer $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ $ C 2016 Wooldridge Alaskan II Rescue Boat $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ 250,( 'C 2016 International Terrastar Aid Car $ 63,000 $ 63,000 $ 63,000 $ 63,000 $ 63,000 $ 63,( d 2016 Freightliner $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,( v 2016 Freightliner $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,( 2016 International Terrastar Aid Car $ 63,000 $ 63,000 $ 63,000 $ 63,000 $ 63,000 $ 63,( 7 2016 Freightliner $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,( IL 2016 Freightliner $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,( N 2017 Pierce Enforcer Fire Engine $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ f` 2017 lPierce Enforcer Fire Engine $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ 2017 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,( LL Q 2017 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 $ $ $ $ - $ - $ 75,( 2017 Chevrolet Tahoe $ $ $ $ - $ $ 50,( d 2017 Ford Utility-Police $ $ $ $ - $ $ 50,( 1 2017 Ford Transit Van $ $ $ $ - $ $ 50,( m 2017 lFord Utility-Police $ $ $ $ - $ $ 50,( 2017 1 Ford Expedition $ $ $ $ - $ $ 50,( 2017 IFord Expedition $ $ $ $ - $ $ 50,( LV r C d E t t) c0 r Q * Puget Sound Fire A-wP Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 72 6.D.c Apparatus cont. E a� 2018 Pierce Enforcer Fire Engine $ $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ c�0 2018 Pierce Enforcer Fire Engine $ $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ v O 2018 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 $ $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ y 2018 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 $ $ $ $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ Q 2018 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 $ $ $ $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ C 2018 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 $ $ $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ M 2019 Pierce Enforcer Fire Engine $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 300,( C 2019 Pierce Enforcer Fire Engine $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 300,000 $ 200,( a) 2019 Pierce Enforcer Fire Engine $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 300,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,( C 2023 Skeeter Brush Truck $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7D 2023 Four(4)Fire Engines (70,72,75, 76) $ 1,745,000 $ $ $ $ $ E 2023 Escape(Order New) $ 40,000 $ - $ $ $ $ Q 2023 HazMat Squads(Order New) $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ $ $ $ d 2023 HazMat Squads(Order New) $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ $ $ $ d 2026 Pierce Enforcer Fire Engine(73) $ 330,000 $ 330,000 $ 340,000 $ $ $ W 2026 lPierce Enforcer Fire Engine(74) 1 $ 330,000 $ 340,000 $ 330,000 $ $ $ M d Equipment Ii Equipment Capital Resource Planned Purchases Q. Six Year Plan R U Resource Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 r- O PPE Ensemble/Ballistic Vests $ 300,000 $ 306,000 $ 274,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,C a Thermal Imaging Cameras $ - $ $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 41,000 $ Defib units(Operations) $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ 100,C N C Fire Hose $ 18,000 $ 18,000 $ 18,000 $ 18,000 $ 18,000 $ 18,C t Forklift $ - $ $ 20,000 $ - $ - $ L Air Packs(SCBAs) $ - $ $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,C sZ Air Compressor(Sta.46) $ - $ $ 40,000 $ - $ - $ O U Air Compressor(Sta.74) $ - $ $ $ $ 40,000 $ d Air Compressor (Sta.75) $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ 40,C +s+ FIT Testing Machines(4) $ - $ $ 60,000 $ $ - $ p Rescue Tools $ 50,000 $ $ $ $ - $ 110,C C HazMat I $ 57,000 1 $ $ - $ $ - $ to 2 Facilities a Facilities Capital Resource Planned Purchases Six Year Plan N Resource Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Sta.71 Bay Door Replacement $ 50,000 $ $ $ $ $ Q Sta.80 Exhaust Extraction System Buildout $ 20,000 $ $ $ $ $ IL to IL I m x Iu c d E z M � Q Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 73 6.D.c c� Information Technology E a� Information Technology Capital Resource Planned Purchases c�C Six Year Plan V O Resource Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 ui Networking Switching $ - $ 35,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 35,000 $ 35,C ERP Replacement $ 390,000 $ 390,000 $ 390,000 $ 390,000 $ 390,000 $ 390,C Timekeeping replacement $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,C d E Infrastructure m E Q Infrastructure Capital Resource Planned Purchases +' C Six Year Plan Resource Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 y Station 70(land) $ 1,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ LV Drill Field Conversion-(SKCFTC) $ 5,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ d 72nd Ave East Extension(Road) $ 120,000 $ $ $ $ $ ' Station 70(New) $ 5,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ U LL fC .Q cC V C R (L 4) .y c as m L Q E O U m t c O c L V N ti M Q LL N d I m .r t x Lu c m E z U r r � Q Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 74 6.D.c Appendix G — PSF Current Facilities Inventory E as 2 Fire Stations c N N Q Fire Stations C Station Number Address city #of Bays n of Dorms Sleep M Station 45 3011 South 200th Street SeaTac 2 4 4 C Station 46 3521 South 17th Street SeaTac 5 10 10 d I: Station 51 17951 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila 2 8 8 'D C Station 52 15447 65th Ave South Tukwila 3 8 8 O Station 53 4202 South 115th Street Tukwila 2 4 4 Q Station 54 4237 South 144th Street Tukwila 2 7 7 +' C Station 70(Leased to Kent PD) 407 North Washington Avenue Kent N/A N/A N/A O Station 71 504 West Crow Street Kent 3 8 8 N Station 72 25620 140th Avenue SE Kent 3 3 6 LV Station 73 26512 Military Road South Kent 3 4 6 y Station 74 24611 116th Avenue SE Kent 3 8 13 =_ Station 75 15635 SE 272 Street Kent 3 7 12 v O Station 76 20676 72nd Avenue South Kent 3 4 6 LL Station 77 20717 132nd Avenue SE Kent 3 5 12 r Station 78 17820 SE 256th Street Covington 12 6 12 Q- R Station 79 (Vacant Land) 21600 108th Avenue SE Kent N/A N/A N/A U Station 80 23775 SE 264th Street Maple Valley 4 4 4 Station 81 22225 SE 231st Street Maple Valley 4 7 7 IL Station 82 27519 SE Kent-Kangley Road Ravensdale 2 4 4 d Station 83 27250 216th Avenue SE Maple Valley 1 3 3 vJ Station 84 16855 194th Avenue SE Renton 2 4 4 GOi Station 85 27605 SE 208th Street Maple Valley 2 4 4 i Station 86(Vacant Land) 124400 SE 216th Street IMaple Valley N/A I N/A I N/A Q- 1 O Administration &Training Facilities c O Administration&Training Facilities tM Hose Tower-71 504 West Crow Street Kent N/A N/A N/A .O C Police/Fire Training 24523 116th Avenue SE Kent N/A N/A N/A M Drill Tower-74 24523 116th Avenue SE Kent N/A N/A N/A = Amateur Radio Building 24523 116th Avenue SE Kent N/A N/A N/A v Recruit Academy Instructor Office 24425 116th Avenue SE Kent N/A N/A N/A j Community Risk Reduction 400 West Gowe Street,Suite 414 Kent N/A N/A N/A IL PSF Community Relations 20811 84th Avenue South,Suite 101A Kent N/A N/A N/A N PSF Future Office/Training Space 20811 84th Avenue South,Suite 101E Kent N/A N/A N/A M SKCFTC/KCM1 20811 84th Avenue South,Suite 102&106 Kent N/A N/A N/A King County E-911 20811 84th Avenue South,Suite 103&105 Kent N/A N/A N/A LL SKCFTC Classroom 20811 84th Avenue South,Suite 108 Kent N/A N/A N/A PSF/SKCFTC Breakout Room 20811 84th Avenue South,Suite 109 Kent N/A N/A N/A a Finance/EMS 20811 84th Avenue South,Suite 110 Kent N/A N/A N/A Cal PSF/SKCFTC Multi-Purpose Room 20811 84th Avenue South,Suite 111 Kent N/A N/A N/A Performance Measurement 20811 84th Avenue South,Suite 112 Kent N/A N/A N/A s Information Technology 20811 84th Avenue South,Suite 114 Kent N/A N/A N/A X li PSF Future Office/Training Space 20811 84th Avenue South,Suite 113&115 Kent N/A N/A N/A r Wellness Center 120811 84th Avenue South,Suite 116 lKent N/A I N/A I N/A O d E t t� c0 r � Q ��� Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan:Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 75 6.D.c c� rL Maintenance & Logistics Facilities E a� r Maintenance&Logistics v Fire Garage-76 20678 72nd Avenue South Kent 6 N/A N/A N Fire Garage-81 22225 SE 231st Street Maple Valley 2 N/A N/A Q Facilities Workshop 15635 SE 272 Street Kent N/A N/A N/A C Logistics 8320 South 208th Street,Suite H-110 Kent N/A N/A N/A M a+ C d E C E Q C N E N W N d r U w LL fC .Q cC V C R a a� .y c as m L Q E O U m t c O tm c �L V N ti M Q LL N d I m .r t x Lu c m E z U r r � Q Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 76 6.D.c c� Appendix H — PSF Current Apparatus Inventory E a� r Fire Engines o Q Fire Engines &Tenders 1997 Pierce Quantum 2015 Freightliner Tender 2000 Pierce Quantum 2016 Pierce Quantum E 2001 Pierce Quantum 2016 Pierce Quantum 2001 Pierce Quantum 2017 Pierce Enforcer E Q 2001 Pierce Quantum 2017 Pierce Enforcer a� 2004 Pierce Quantum 2018 Pierce Enforcer E 2 2004 Pierce Quantum 2018 Pierce Enforcer w 2005 Pierce Quantum 2019 Pierce Enforcer r 2006 Sutphen Monarch 2019 Pierce Enforcer 2006 Sutphen Monarch 2019 Pierce Enforcer u_ 2008 Pierce Quantum 2019 Pierce Velocity f° a 2010 Pierce Quantum Skyboom 2019 Pierce Velocity U 2010 Pierce Quantum Skyboom 2022 Pierce Enforcer 2010 Sutphen Monarch 2022 Pierce Enforcer a d 2012 Sutphen Tender 2022 Pierce Enforcer c 2014 Pierce Velocity 2022 Pierce Enforcer 2014 Pierce Velocity 2023 Pierce Enforcer a 2015 lFreightliner Tender 2023 Pierce Enforcer c U m t Ladder Trucks, Brush Trucks, and Fire Boats 0 a� c •L Aerial Ladder Trucks Wildland Brush Trucks = 2006 Pierce Aerial Ladder 1996 International Brush Truck 2 2006 Pierce Quantum Tiller 2003 Ford F350 Brush Truck a 2014 Pierce Arrow Tiller 2022 Ford F550 Brush Truck a; N 2019 Pierce Velocity Aerial Ladder 2023 BME Freightliner Brush Truck M 2021 Pierce Enforcer Tiller 2023 BME Freightliner Brush Truck Q Fire Boats 2023 Skeeter Brush Truck 2010 Woolridge Alaskan Boat a i 2016 Woolridge Alaskan II Boat °0 x w c m E z U 0 r r � Q Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 77 6.D.c c� Staff Vehicles _E E a� Staff Vehicles U 1999 Chevrolet Suburban 2017 Ford SUV �°, 2000 Ford Expedition 2017 Ford SUV Q 2003 Chevrolet Suburban 2017 Chevrolet Tahoe 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe 2018 Ford Explorer- Police 2005 Chevrolet Suburban 2018 Ford Explorer - Police E 2006 Ford Expedition 2019 Chevrolet Tahoe 2006 Ford Expedition 2019 Chevrolet Tahoe Q 2006 Ford Expedition 2020 Ford Explorer Interceptor 2007 Ford Expedition 2022 Ford Escape Hybrid aEi 2008 Ford Escape 2022 Ford Escape Hybrid N 2008 Ford Escape 2022 Ford Escape Hybrid r 2008 Ford Escape 2022 Ford Escape Hybrid 2008 Ford Escape 2022 Ford Escape Hybrid w Ta 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe 2022 Ford Escape Hybrid Q. c� 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe 2022 Ford Escape Hybrid v c 2012 Toyota FJ CRUISER 2022 Ford Escape Hybrid a 2012 Ford Escape 2022 Ford Explorer Interceptor 2013 Chevrolet Suburban 2022 Ford Explorer Interceptor 2014 Chevrolet Tahoe 2022 Ford Explorer Interceptor 2017 Ford Expedition 2022 Ford Explorer Interceptor 2017 Ford Expedition 2023 Ford Explorer Interceptor 0 U 2017 Ford SUV c 0 Utility Apparatus L Utility Apparatus = 1990 Hyster Forklift 2010 Exmark Riding Lawnmower 0 1995 Toyota Forklift 2011 John Deere Gator ATV a 1999 Freightliner Air Truck 2012 Club Car Carryall 1500 ATV N ti 2005 Genie Scissor Lift 2016 Reach Truck 2007 Freightliner Service Truck 2020 IGenie Scissor Lift 2008 International SVI Rescue/Air a i m x w c m E z U 0 r r � a Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 78 6.D.c c� Pickup &Utility Trucks E a� Pickup & Utility Trucks U 1995 Ford F250 XL 2017 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 �°, 1995 Ford F350 XL Flatbed Truck 2017 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 a 2004 Ford F350 2017 Ford F250 2006 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 2018 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 c m 2006 Ford F450 2018 Chevrolet Silverado E 2007 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 2019 Ford F250 m 2008 Ford F350 2019 Ford F250 Q 2008 Ford F350 2019 Ford F350 a� 2010 Ford F550 2019 Ford F350 2011 Ford F350 2020 Ford F250 w 2012 Ford F350 2022 Ram 2500 Service Truck r 2016 Ford F250 2022 Ram 2500 Service Truck U w w Ta .Q c� Aid Cars (Ambulances) v c IL Aid Cars 2005 International Aid Car 2015 International Aid Car c a� 2005 International Aid Car 2019 Ford F550 Aid Car m L 2007 Ford E350 Aid Car 2019 Ford F550 Aid Car Q- E 2013 International Aid Car 2021 Dodge 4500 Aid Car 0 2013 International Aid Car c 0 Trailers c Trailers a� 1978 Custom Trailer 2010 EZ Loader Trailer = 1990 Lawnmower Trailer 2010 Wells Cargo Utility Trailer 1994 Spirit Trailer 2010 Wells Cargo Utility Trailer a 2000 Avenger HazMat Trailer 2011 Falcon Utility Trailer N ti 2003 Haulmark Trailer 2012 Eagle Trailer 2005 Wells Cargo Utility Trailer 2014 Pump Simulator Trailer 2005 Whiteman Light Trailer 2016 Midsota Trailer (nn IL 2005 Haulmark Trailer 2016 Haulmark Trailer m 2006 Top Hat Trailer 2016 Allmand Light Trailer 2007 Haulmark Trailer 2017 Pi HazMat Trailer x 2007 Trailblazer Trailer 2017 PJ HazMat Trailer w 2009 EZ Loader Trailer 2018 EZ Loader Trailer z U 0 r r � a Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 79 6.D.c c� CL Vans E E a� r Vans T U 1994 Ford E150 Van 2015 Ford Transit 350 Van �°, 2001 GMC Safari Van 2015 Ford Transit Van Q 2012 Ford Transit Connect XLT Van 2015 Ford Transit Van 2015 Nissan NV200 Van 2017 Ford Transit Van c m 2015 Nissan NV200 Van 2020 Ford Transit Connect Van E c m E Air Compressors Q c a� Air Compressors 2 w Cascade Compressor Cascade Compressor Cascade Compressor Cascade Compressor = Cascade Compressor Cascade Compressor Li Cascade Compressor Cascade Compressor (Mobile) Cascade Compressor Cascade Compressor (Mobile) Q- c� Cascade Compressor U FL a� .y c as m L Q E O U m t c O c L V a. N ti M Q LL N d I m .r t x w c m E z U r r � Q Puget Sound Fire Capital Improvement Plan: Mitigation &Level of Service Policy P Packet Pg. 80 6.D.d a Auburn School District No. 408 O N N Q C R C O Ca C O E a E F r"qmVelteltel s Pt n m r U- r .Q U c 2023 through 2029 L Q E O U a� t r c O Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors M June 12, 2023. a N ti M C L 3 P►uBuRIV a, SCHOOL DISTRICT U ENGAGE EDUCATE EMPOWER L X W r C d E t V r r a Packet Pg. 81 6.D.d a E At R U B 0 N N a SCH4aL DISTRICT ENGAGE - EDUCATE - EMPOWER E a� 915 Fourth Street SE a Auburn, Washington 98002 a) w (253) 931-4900 0 Serving Students in: Q ns City of Auburn c ns City of Algona a City of Kent City of Pacif c a City of Black Diamond E U Unincorporated King County c 0 0 Board of Directors Tracy Arnold Valerie Gonzales a Cn Arlista Holman N ti M Sheilia McLaughlin Laura Theimer a, U t x Dr. Alan Spicciati, Superintendent w r a� E ns a Packet Pg. 82 6.D.d Capital Facilities Plan a E a� TABLE OF CONTENTS 0 N N a SECTION I c Executive Summary Page 3 a� E SECTION 11 Enrollment Projections and Student Generation Factors Page 8 a SECTION III 0 w Standard of Service Page 17 SECTION IV 0 Inventory of Facilities Page 24 a 0 U SECTION V Student Capacity Page 28 .N SECTION VI Capital Construction Plan Page 31 0 U SECTION VI Impact Fees Page 33 0 aM c �L d V a M N ti M C L Q U t x w r c m E 0 a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 83 6.D.d Capital Facilities Plan a E a� SECTION I — EXECUTIVE SUMMARY o N N a This six-year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Auburn School District (the "District") as the District's principal planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities E a served by the District. This Plan was prepared using data available in the a� spring of 2023. E w This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic long-range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period; other factors and trends in the use c of facilities; and other needs of the District as may be required. However, any a such plan or plans will be consistent with this six-year Capital Facilities Plan. ; .N To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and within the Cities of Auburn, Black Diamond and Kent; the King E County Council, the City of Auburn, the City of Black Diamond, and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction's respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of c Algona and Pacif c, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt L school impact fee ordinances. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act and the local a ordinances, this Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in on the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. M L The Plan establishes the District's "Standard of Service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of a1 Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the w District to clef ne its standard of service based on the District's specif c needs. E a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 84 6.D.d Capital Facilities Plan a E In general, the District's current standard provides that class size for grades K-3 should not exceed 17 students and class size for grades 4-5 should not exceed 27 students. When averaged over the six y elementary school grades, this computes to 20.33 students per a classroom. Class size for grade 6 should not exceed 27 students and class size for grades 7 and 8 should not exceed 28.53 students. When averaged over the three middle school grades, this computes to 28.02 students per classroom. Class size for 9-12 should not exceed 28.74 students, with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers. a Decisions by current legislative actions may create the need for additional classrooms. (See Section III Standard of Service for more specif c T w information.) N 2 The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this Standard of Service and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The District's 2022-23 permanent capacity was 18,796. The actual number of individual students was 17,059 as of October 1, 2022. (See Section V for more specif c information.) a .N In the spring of 2016, the Board determined to move forward with the replacement of six schools and the construction of two new a elementary schools. The project was placed before the voters in E November 2016 and the bond passed at 62.83%. The f rst of the projects, the replacement of Olympic Middle School, started construction in May 2018 and opened in Fall 2019. The district's new elementary, Bowman Creek Elementary, started construction in May L 2019 and opened in August 2020. Construction for replacement of = Dick Scobee Elementary School started in June 2019 and the school •" Z opened in August 2020. Construction of Willow Crest Elementary a School and construction of the replacement Pioneer Elementary School on N started May 2020 and both opened in August 2021. For the 2021-22 M school year, Willow Crest Elementary served as the temporary home for Lea Hill Elementary School which started the replacement 3 construction process in May 2021 and opened as its own school in a, August 2022. Construction for replacement of Chinook Elementary School started in May 2021 and the new school opened in August x 2022 as well. Construction for replacement of Terminal Park w r Elementary School began in May 2022 and is scheduled to open in August 2023. a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 85 6.D.d Capital Facilities Plan a E a� The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of I U Auburn, City of Black Diamond and City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the f scal impacts incurred by a a district experiencing growth and development. Section VII sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multi-family dwelling units. The student generation factors have been developed using the students who actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and multi-family developments constructed in the last f ve years. The method of a collecting the data is with the use of GIS mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County GIS, data from Davis Demographics and w integration of the mapping with student data from the District's student data U) system. This method gives the District actual student generation numbers for each grade span for identif ed developments. U_ .Q U c ca d a� .N c m t a� L Q E O U O t .r c O 0) C �L d V a M N ti M C L Q U t x w r c m E a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 86 6.D.d Capital Facilities Plan a E Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2022 Capital Facilities Plan that are a part of the 2023 Plan. The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference. o SECTION I Executive Summary A. Updated to reflect new information within the Plan. B. Summary level list of changes from previous year. E SECTION II a Enrollment Projections and Student a Generation Factors A. Updated projections. E w SECTION III Standard of Service A. Updated to reflect the current number of classrooms allocated to non-standard classroom uses. .Q SECTION IV Inventory of Facilities A. Move 2 portables from Arthur Jacobsen Elementary and 2 portables a from Ilalko Elementary to Auburn High School. B. Move 1 portable from Arthur Jacobsen Elementary and 3 portables from Ilalko Elementary to Auburn Mountainview High School. c. Move 1 portable from Arthur Jacobsen Elementary to Auburn Riverside High School. 0 D. Move 1 portable from Gildo Rey Elementary and 2 portables from Lake View Elementary to Cascade Middle School. E. Add 1 portable to Cascade Middle School. 0 c �L Section V = Student Capacity •" A. The 12 portables to be relocated and one new portable to be added in a July 2024 are needed to accommodate enrollment increases at ti our middle and high schools. L Q U t x w r c m E a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 87 6.D.d Capital Facilities Plan a E a� CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2022 TO 2023 0 N DATA ELEMENTS CFP 2022 CFP 2023 EXPLANATION N a Student Generation Consistent with King County Ordinance Factors 11621, Student Generation Factors are 0 Single Family calculated by the school district based on Elementary 0.3010 0.303 district records of average actual student E Middle School 0.1460 0.133 generation rates for new developments c High School 0.1550 0.151 constructed over the last f ve years. E Multi-Family Q Elementary 0.3920 0.440 Middle School 0.1350 0.150 E High School 0.1530 0.172 2 w School Construction Costs Middle School $134,320,000 $143,000,000 From new school construction cost Ui estimates in April 2023. .Q Site Acquisition Updated estimate based on 10% annual v Costs $489,248 $513,509 inflation. Cost per Acre a- Area Cost Updated to current OSPI schedule. (May Allowance $246.83 $246.83 2023) Boeckh Index y Updated to current OSPI schedule (May Match % - State 63.83% 64.58% 2023) Q- E Match % - District 36.17% 35.42% Computed v District Average Assessed Valuation Updated from March 2023 King County Single Family $458,409 $573,704 Dept. of Assessments data. 0 a� c Updated from March 2023 King County m Multi-Family $223,737 $270,892 Dept. of Assessments data using average x assessed valuation for apartments and 2 condominiums. a Debt Sery Tax Rate $2.13 $1.84 Current Fiscal Year M N General Obligation 2.45% 3.58% Current Rate - February 2023 Bond Interest Rate (Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-14) L Q I U t x w r c m E 0 a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 88 6.D.d Capital Facilities Plan a E a� SECTION II - ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS AND N N STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS a Student Enrollment Projections Projection techniques give consideration to historical and current data as a a basis for forecasting the future. In addition, certain assumptions must be made about the variables in the data being used. Forecasting can be clef ned E as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future or from the N known to the unknown. The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, U_ psychological, economic, and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection. An example of this is with the COVID-19 pandemic. The logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today and will be in the future. It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over time. a� L Q The basis of enrollment projections in the Auburn School District has been E cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group of students a� in a grade level as it progresses through time. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. If all students in one grade level progress to the next, the cohort number would be L 1.00. If fewer students from the group progress the number will be less than 1. _ The district has used this method with varying years of history (3 years, 6 •" years, 10 years and 13 years) as well as weighted factors to study several a projections. on N ti Additionally, the District contracted with Davis Demographics to develop and analyze demographic data relevant to the District's facility planning efforts. The report created by Davis Demographics identif es and informs the District a of the trends occurring in the community, how these trends may affect future student populations, and assists in illustrating facility adjustments that may be necessary to accommodate the potential student population shifts. Davis' w Ten-Year Forecast Methodology uses factors including the calculation of a� E a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 89 6.D.d Capital Facilities Plan a E a� incoming kindergarten classes, additional students from new housing, the I U effects of student mobility and a detailed review of planned residential development within the District. Q c The data from the report is a snapshot of the current and potential student populations based on the data gathered in fall 2022. Population E demographics change, development plans change, funding opportunities can change, and District priorities can change. The degree to which the E a actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact. This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the E assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections. Monitoring U deviation is critical to the viability and creditably of the projections derived by these techniques. U- .Q U c ca d a� .N c m t a� L Q E O U O t .r c O 0 C �L d V a rn N ti M C L Q U t x w r c m E a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 90 Capital Facilitie Overview of 2022-23 Enrollment Projections Table 1 shows historical enrollment for the October 1 count in the Auburn School District over the past 20 years. The data shows overall average growth over the recent 10 years is 1.69%. It is important to note this U- average includes a 4.22% decrease in October 2020 enrollment due to the COVID pandemic. a- m U TABLE 1 Historical Enrollmentl: October 1 Actuals, K-12 (No IRS,OD,GA) Source:OSPI 1251H c 0 GRADE 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21* 21-22* 22-23 a- am KDG 921 892 955 940 995 998 1,032 1,010 1,029 1,098 1,170 1,232 1,198 1,237 1,261 1,271 1,291 1,038 1,227 1,34 •� uJ 1 982 960 963 1,012 995 1,014 1,033 1,066 1,068 1,089 1,188 1,219 1,279 1,210 1,276 1,290 1,314 1,236 1,185 1,30 2 909 992 963 1,001 1,019 1,024 998 1,016 1,097 1,083 1,124 1,196 1,289 1,300 1,251 1,311 1,295 1,243 1,249 1,24 Q. 3 996 918 1,002 1,031 997 1,048 993 1,013 996 1,111 1,125 1,136 1,232 1,317 1,328 1,275 1,320 1,243 1,264 1,32 E 0 4 947 1,016 939 1,049 1,057 1,045 1,073 1,024 1,022 1,038 1,123 1,156 1,170 1,237 1,328 1,378 1,316 1,257 1,255 1,32 aa) t 5 1,018 956 1,065 998 1,077 1,070 1,030 1,079 1,017 1,070 1,075 1,122 1,172 1,199 1,269 1,345 1,361 1,294 1,251 1,29 E 6 1,111 1,020 1,004 1,061 1,008 1,096 1,040 1,041 1,063 1,041 1,076 1,059 1,116 1,152 1,207 1,275 1,337 1,306 1,233 1,22 0 a� c 7 1,131 1,124 1,028 1,014 1,057 1,034 1,125 1,060 1,032 1,086 1,072 1,091 1,099 1,132 1,194 1,232 1,295 1,319 1,304 1,26 'M 8 1,052 1,130 1,137 1,069 1,033 1,076 1,031 1,112 1,046 1,018 1,116 1,088 1,136 1,108 1,183 1,213 1,236 1,264 1,312 1,31 2 9 1,464 1,459 1,379 1,372 1,337 1,257 1,245 1,221 1,273 1,200 1,159 1,275 1,229 1,261 1,257 1,372 1,399 1,351 1,386 1,45 10 1,246 1,260 1,383 1,400 1,367 1,341 1,277 1,238 1,168 1,278 1,229 1,169 1,316 1,248 1,300 1,313 1,410 1,376 1,388 1,41 li 11 991 1,019 1,153 1,294 1,305 1,304 1,269 1,212 1,177 1,116 1,187 1,169 1,111 1,248 1,188 1,198 1,218 1,174 1,299 1,30 N ti 12 841 833 989 1,068 1,176 1,259 1,319 1,251 1,220 1,231 1,186 1,218 1,175 1,104 1,266 1,126 1,113 1,089 1,248 1,25 TOTALS 13,609 13,579 13,960 14,309 14,423 14,566 14,465 14,343 14,208 14,459 14,830 15,130 15,522 15,753 16,308 16,599 16,905 16,190 16,601 17,05 E- Student Gain/Loss 351 349 114 143 -101 -122 -135 251 371 300 392 231 555 291 306 -715 411 458 0 Q I Percent Gain/Loss 2.58% 2.50% 0.80% 0.99% -0.69% -0.84% -0.94% 1.77% 2.57% 2.02% 2.59% 1.49% 3.52% 1.78% 1.84% -4.23% 2.54% 2.7651' L) Average Student Gain/Loss for Recent 10 years 26 *COVID Pandemic Average Percent Gain/Loss for Recent 10 years 1.690, W r c am E t r Q Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 91 6.D.d Capital Facilities Plan a E a� Some of the assumptions made in calculating projections for the 2023-24 school year are: a 1. Local birth data is collected and incorporated into forecasting future kindergarten students. Births trended upward from 2019 to 2021. It is estimated that the pattern shown in recent area births will be reflected E in future kindergarten classes between 2023-24 to 2026-27. r_ 2. Student retention as they progress through the grades is the most E a impactful factor when calculating future student populations. Over 50% of the total grade transitions are above 1.0 meaning students continue E their education from grade to grade and there is an increased number w of students as well. 3. Approximately 69 new single-family detached units are planned to be built within the District in the next ten years. It is estimated that the U_ planned units may generate 37 K-12 students. a 4. The number of out-of-District students (students who do not reside within the district boundaries) has been incorporated into the forecasts by calculating their current overall percentage of student enrollment, then applying the ratio to future years, and adding it to the resident forecasts. L The data calculated from the factors above indicate an overall increase over the next ten years. Assuming the out-of-district student proportion of the 0 overall enrollment stays at its current level, total K-12 enrollment is forecasted to increase by approximately 9% to about 18,637 students by the 2032-33 r_ school year. a S Table 2 below shows the District Forecast Summary for the next 5 years. x a M N ti M C L Q U t x w r c m E a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 92 6.D.d Capital Facilities Plan a E a� Table 2: Student Enrollment Projections 2023-2027 0 N N a GRADE 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 c 0 In-District Students KDG 1,388 ! 1,251 ` 1,289 ` 1,339 1,315 ` 1,315 0 1 1,366 1,453 1,309 1,348 1,402 1,376 E 2 1,257 1,364 1,450 1,306 1,345 1,398 Q r c 3 1,220 1,278 - 1,387 1,475 - 1,329 1,368 4 1,290 1,228 1,285 1,397 1,485 1,337 T Lu 5 1,288 1,299 1,238 1,292 1,403 1,491 6 1,236 1,266 1,276 1,218 1,272 1,381 7 1,211 1,245 1,275 1,287 1,225 1,283 Li 8 1,232 1,210 1,242 1,272 1,281 1,220 - - - 0- 9 1,320 1,268 1,245 1,277 1,308 1,321 10 1,355 1,335 1,282 1,260 1,293 1,325 c�a 11 1,188 1,246 1,229 1,179 1,156 1,190 a a� 12 - 1,135 - 1,149 - 1,207 1,189 1,140 - 1,118 SUBTOTAL 16,486 16,592 16,714 16,839 16,954 17,124 z - - 0 L Out-of-District Students E E 0 K-5 271 274 276 283 288 288 t) - - 0 6-8 89 90 92 91 92 94 9-12 498 498 495 ' 489 488 494 0 SUBTOTAL 858 _ 862 863 863 8681 876 L TOTAL STUDENTS = K-5 - 8,080 - 8,147 8,234 _ 8,440 _ 8,567 - 8,573 6-8 3,768 3,811 3,885 3,868 3,870 3,978 a 9-12 - 5,496 - 5,496 5,458 - 5,394 - 5,385 - 5,448 N GRAND TOTAL K-12 17,344 17,454 17,577 17,702 17,822 17,999 L Q U t x w r c m E 0 a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 93 6.D.d Capital Facilities Plan a E a� 0 N N Student Generation Factors a Planned residential development data is collected to determine the number of new residential units that may be built in the future. The projected number of units will have the appropriate Student Generation Factor applied to estimate the number of new students that planned residential development E a might yield. E Planned residential development data was obtained through discussions w with city agencies, counties, and major developers within the district U) boundaries. The student population by residence includes all approved and tentative tract maps in addition to any planned or proposed development U_ that possibly will occur within the project timeframe. The planned residential development information and phasing estimates are a snapshot of the U District as of this time. The information may change and is updated annually. a Closely related to the planned residential development units are Student ; Generation Factors. When applied to planned residential development units, the Student Generation Factors determine how many additional students may be generated from new construction within the District. E 0 U Two sets of data are used to calculate Student Generation Factors: current student enrollment and current housing data. This information associates c each student with a housing unit. Two general housing categories are analyzed: Single Family and Multi-Family. Data showing the number of students generated from previous single- and multi-family developments = generates the Student Generation Factor to be applied to future developments. a on The tables on the next two pages show the information for both single-and M multi-family developments. The components include: L • "Development Name" is a list of developments in various stages of a occupancy. • "Year of Full Occupancy" is important because fully-occupied developments stay on the list for f ve years contributing to the Student w Generation Factor. Once the f ve years is up, the development is removed from the list. E 0 a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 94 6.D.d Capital Facilities Plan a E a� • Also included for each development listed is the number of units, the amount of current units occupancy and the remaining units to be 0 occupied. a • "Feeder Pattern" shows the elementary school associated with each development. • "Actual Students" is the data of actual students generated from the E units already occupied. • "Student Generation Factors" is the calculation of actual students E divided by the number of occupied units. • "Single Family--2023 and beyond" lists the developments that are in T w process, but have not yet started to occupy units. This clef nition also appliestofuture Multi-family units. • The units for these developments are multiplied by the Student Generation Factor for each to determine the "Estimated Students Based on Student Generation Factors" U c ca d Below are the Student Generation Factors for 2023. .N 2023 Single-Family Multi-Family L Elementary 0.303 0.440 0 Middle 0.133 0.150 U as High 0.151 0.172 c Total 0.587 0.762 a, c L d SINGLE DEVELOPMENT 2 Z MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENT a rn N ti M C L Q U t x w r c m E 0 a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 95 Capital Facilitie Auburn School District Development Growth Including the Previous 5 Years March 2023(Based on Current Year Enrollment) to SINGLE FAMILY °' Year of Full Units/ Current To Be Feeder Actual Students Student Generation Factors Development Name M Occupancy Parcels Occupancy Occupied Elementary Elem Middle HS Total Elem Middle HS Total LL Anthem 2018 13 13 0 Ilalko 9 2 2 13 0.692 0.154 0.154 1.000 M Bridges 2021 380 380 0 Aurthur Jacobsen 106 40 47 193 0.279 0.105 0.124 0.508 a Canyon Creek 2018 151 151 0 Evergreen Hts. 32 16 15 63 0.212 0.106 0.099 0.417 ) Dulcinea 2018 6 6 0 Lea Hill 6 1 2 9 1.000 0.167 0.333 1.500 a Forest Glen at Lakland 2021 30 30 0 Gildo Rey 8 4 1 13 0.267 0.133 0.033 0.433 Greenvale 17 12 5 Hazelwood 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 rn c Greenview Estates(Knudson) 17 6 11 Arthur Jacobsen 1 1 0 2 0.167 0.167 0.000 0.333 t Hastings 2020 10 10 0 Evergreen Hts. 4 1 2 7 0.400 0.100 0.200 0.700 Q. Hazel View 2018 22 22 0 Lea Hill 9 4 4 17 0.409 0.182 0.182 0.773 E 0 Lakeland: Pinnacle Estates 2018 99 99 0 Bowman Creek 41 28 24 93 0.414 0.283 0.242 0.939 cU Lozier Ranch 18 7 11 Chinook 1 0 0 1 0.1431 0.000 0.0001 0.143 a) r Mountain View 2018 55 55 0 Evergreen Hts. 14 4 8 26 0.255 0.073 0.145 0.473 0 Palisades (Omni Homes) 16 14 2 Alpac 3 2 5 10 0.214 0.143 0.357 0.714 p River Rock 14 6 8 Aurthur Jacobsen 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 'L- 0 Seremounte 2019 30 30 0 Aurthur Jacobsen 23 11 17 51 0.767 0.367 0.567 1.700 m 2 Vasiliy 2021 8 8 0 Terminal Park 2 0 0 2 0.250 U. 0.000 0.250 2 Willow Place 2021 ill 11 0 Lea Hill 2 0 3 5 0.182 0.000 0.273 0.455 3 d Totals 897 860 37 261 114 130 505 0.303 0.133 0.151 0.587 N ti SINGLE FAMILY--2023 and Beyond L Units/ Current To Be Student Generation Factors Development Name 0 Parcels Occupancy Occupied Elem Middle HS Total Q Allens Acres 20-Lot Prelim Plat 20 0 20 6 3 3 12 U Ashton Park 20-Lot Prelim Plat 20 0 20 6 3 3 12 Canyon Ridge Estates 26 0 26 8 3 4 15 z Carbon Trails 44 0 44 13 6 7 26 x w River Glen 12-Lot Plat 12 0 12 4 2 2 7 Robbins Prelim Plat 31-Lot SFR Lots 31 0 31 9 4 5 18 m Summit at Kendall Ridge Plat 17 0 17 5 2 3 10 The Alicias 56-Lot Plat 56 0 56 17 7 8 33 0 Z r "To Be Occcupied" above 37 0 37 11 5 6 22 Q 243 243 Totals 66 29 33 127 Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 96 Capital Facilities P Auburn School District 2 Development Growth Including the Previous 5 Years = March 2023(Based on Current Year Enrollment) u- MULTI FAMILY a 0 U Year of Full Units/ Current To Be Feeder Actual Students Student Generation Factors M Development Name Occupancy Parcels Occupancy Occupied Elementary a Elem Middle HS Total Elem Middle HS Total am Promenade A is 2018 294 294 0 Lea Hill 205 100 104 409 0.697 0.340 0.354 1.391 The Villas at Auburn 2018 295 1 295 0 Washington 59 14 27 100 0.200 0.047 0.092 0.339 Copper Gate Apartments 2021 500 500 0 Evergreen Hts. 308 81 94 483 0.616 0.162 0.188 0.966 The Verge Auburn 2022 226 226 0 Terminal Park 7 2 1 10 0.031 0.009 0.004 0.044 Q- E Totals 1315 1315 0 579 197 226 1002 10.440 1 0.150 0.172 0.762 0 U a� t r MULTI FAMILY -- 2023 and beyond c a� c Units/ Current To Be Estimated Students Based on M Parcels Occupancy Occupied Student Generation Factors 2 1-exi1 190 0 190 84 28 33 145 2 "To be Occupied" above 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 190 190 84 28 33 145 rn N ti M C L Q I U t K W a+ C d E L v r Q Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 97 6.D.d Capital Facilities Plan a E a� SECTION III - STANDARD OF SERVICE o N N a The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn, City of Black Diamond and the City of Kent indicate that each school E district must establish a "Standard of Service" in order to ascertain the overall capacity to house its projected student population. The Superintendent of a Public Instruction establishes square footage "capacity" guidelines for computing state funding support. The fundamental purpose of the OSPI 0 guidelines is to provide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching funds N for school construction projects. By default these guidelines have been used to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population. The OSPI guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, facility conf gurations, emerging educational reform, or the dynamics of each student's educational program. The Auburn School District Standard of Service addresses those local considerations that require space in excess of a the OSPI guidelines. The effect on the space requirements for both .N permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation pattern. Conditions that may result in potential space needs are a provided for information purposes without accompanying computations. E U t .r c OVERVIEW 0 S �L As reflected in enrollment numbers for the 2022-23 school year, the Auburn School District operates 16 elementary schools housing 8,280 students in 2 grades K through 5 including Early Childhood Education program. The four a middle schools house 3,731 students in grades 6 through 8. The District on operates three comprehensive senior high schools and one alternate high M school, housing 5,285 students in grades 9 through 12. (Source: October 1, L 2022 Enrollment) a i U t x w r c m E a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 98 6.D.d Capital Facilities Plan a E a� CLASS SIZE a The number of students per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the student population. Specialists create additional space needs. Class sizes are subject to collective bargaining agreements. Changes to class size agreements can have signif cant impact on available space. E a The current student/teacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 20.33 students per teacher. Consistent with this staff ng limit, w room capacities are set at 20.33 students per room at grades K - S. At grades 2 6 - 8 the limit is set at 28.02 students per room. At grades 9 - 12 the limit is set at 28.74 students per room. The OSPI space allocation for each grade U- articulation level, less the computed reduction for the Auburn School District 0_ Standard of Service, determines the District's capacity to house projected student populations. These reductions are shown in the following documents by grade articulation level. .N ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STANDARD OF SERVICE a E 0 MIDDLE SCHOOL STANDARD OF SERVICE a� HIGH SCHOOL STANDARD OF SERVICE 0 0 c �L STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS x B a M N ti M C L Q U t x w r c m E 0 a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 99 6.D.d ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS E STRUCTURED LEARNING FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION m The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate to severe disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses 19 classrooms to provide for 151 students. v The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. No loss of 0 capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to N a total elementary population. c PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates an adaptive behavior program for students with behavior disabilities at the elementary school level.The program uses two classrooms to provide for 10 students. E The housing requirements for this program exceed the OSPI space allocations. m (Two classrooms @ 20.33-8=12.33) E a Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 12.33 each = (25) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 12.33 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (25) d W SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities. Twenty-one standard classrooms are required to house this program.Continued loss of capacity is expected as growth u_ in program is larger than the total elementary population. t�v Q Loss of Permanent Capacity 17(20-3)rooms @ 20.33 each = (346) to U Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = 0 r_ Total Capacity Loss = (346) d a� STUDENT TEACHER ENRICHMENT PROGRAM(STEP) >_ The Auburn School District operates an elementary program for highly capable and high achieving c students at Grade 4 and Grade 5. This program is housed in two classrooms at Terminal Park a) Elementary School and two classrooms at Willow Crest Elementary School. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 20.33 each= (81) 0 Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @20.33 each= 0 U Total Capacity Loss= (81) t .r c EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION 0 The Auburn School District operates a pre-school program for young children below age five with disabilities. This program is housed at fifteen different elementary schools and currently uses 15 standard classrooms.The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI m space guidelines. _ v Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @ 20.33 each = (305) d Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (305) N ti READING LABS The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional L language arts instruction. These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces if available in 3 each elementary school. Five elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available,thus Q they are housed in a standard classroom.The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. U Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 20.33 each = (102) K Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = 0 W Total Capacity Loss = (102) r c 0 E t 0 a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 100 6.D.d MUSIC ROOMS The Auburn School District elementary music programs require one acoustically-modified classroom at each E school for music instruction. The housing requirements are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. m ca Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @ 20.33 each = (305) v Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = 0 0 N Total Capacity Loss = (305) N a MULTI-LINGUAL LEARNER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates pullout programs at the elementary school level for multi-lingual +. learner students. This program requires 33 standard classrooms that are not provided for in the y OSPI space guidelines. E c Loss of Permanent Capacity 33 rooms @ 20.33 each = (671) E Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = 0 Q Total Capacity Loss = (671) m SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM d The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for eight highly-impacted W elementary schools. This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade aNi level and do not receive other services. This program requires eight standard classrooms that are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. v 0 u_ Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 20.33 each = (163) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = 0 Q Total Capacity Loss = (163) tU c ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a learning specialist program to increase literacy skills for d first and second graders. This program model was originally created from the I-728 funds and currently has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms,as well as pulling out students into N c designated classrooms. The district is utilizing classrooms at all fifteen elementary schools. m t a� L Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @ 20.33 each = (305) Q- Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = 0 E Total Capacity Loss = (305) U t EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (ECEAP) The Auburn School District operates an ECEAP program for 246 pre-school aged children in twelve sections 0 of half-day length and one full-day program. The program is housed at seven elementary schools c and utilizes ten standard elementary classrooms and one additional classroom space and seven auxiliary office spaces. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI a0i space guidelines. _ v Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 20.33 each = (203) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = 0 d Total Capacity Loss = (203) rn N ti M C L Q I U t x w r c m E a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 101 6.D.d MIDDLE SCHOOLS a E SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS m The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level. This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific o disabilities. Eleven classrooms are required at the middle school level to provide for approximately 330 students. N The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Q c PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior a� disabilities. The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses two classrooms. One of the E two classrooms for this program are provided for in the OSPI space allocations. m E Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 rooms @ 28.02 each = (28) Q Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (28) E am STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION w The Auburn School District operates seven structured learning classrooms at the middle school level for 2 students with moderate to severe disabilities. Two of the seven classrooms for this program are provided for = in the OSPI space allocations. u_ Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 28.02 each = (140) a Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each = 0 M Total Capacity Loss (140) U c c� MULTI-LINGUAL LEARNER PROGRAM d The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for multi-lingual > learner students. This program requires 12 standard classrooms that are not provide for in the OSPI c space guidelines. t a� L Loss of Permanent Capacity 12 rooms @ 28.02 each = (336) Q- E Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each = 0 0 Total Capacity Loss (336) t .r ROOM UTILIZATION 0 The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are L not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. _ Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 28.02 each = (224) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each = 0 a Total Capacity Loss (224) N ti M C L Q I U t x w r c m E 0 a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 102 6.D.d HIGH SCHOOLS Q. NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM — The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the high school level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. to O Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 28.74 each = (29) N Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each = 0 Q Total Capacity Loss (29) C R MULTI-LINGUAL LEARNER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at three comprehensive high schools for multi- lingual learner students. This program requires 15 standard classrooms that are not provided E for in the OSPI space guidelines. C N Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @ 28.74 each= (431) Q Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (431) O PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION W The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior y diabilities. The program is housed at one of the high schools and uses two classrooms. The housing d requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI space allocations. _ O Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 28.74 each= (57) LL Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (57) Q- M t� STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM O The Auburn School District operates twelve structured learning center classrooms for students with moderate to severe disabilities. This program is housed at three high schools requiring standard d classrooms that are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. > .y Loss of Permanent Capacity 12 rooms @ 28.74 each= (345) d Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (345) M E SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS O t� The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special d education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities. The current high school program requires 15 classrooms to provide program to meet educational needs of C the students. The OSPI space guidelines provide for one of the 15 teaching stations. 0 C Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 28.74 each= (402) L to Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each= 0 a) Total Capacity Loss (402) _ v PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center.The d OSPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity. This space was not intended for,nor is it usable for,classroom instruction. It was constructed to provide a N ti community center for the performing arts. Using OSPI capacity guidelines,25,000 square feet C") computes to 208 unhoused students or 7.25 classrooms. O 7 Loss of Permanent Capacity 7.25 rooms @ 28.74 each= (208) a ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous r elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are Z not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95%utilization of all available teaching stations.There are 185 teaching stations available in the senior high facilities. The utilization W pattern results in a loss of approximately 10 teaching stations. O Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 28.74 each= (287) E Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each= 0 v Total Capacity Loss (287) Q Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 103 6.D.d a E m ca STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS o ELEMENTARY Q Loss of Permanent Capacity (2,505) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (2,505) MIDDLE SCHOOL c Loss of Permanent Capacity (729) E Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Q r Total Capacity Loss (729) SENIOR HIGH d Loss of Permanent Capacity (1,760) N a� Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,760) TOTAL R Loss of Permanent Capacity (4,994) a Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (4,994) cOa a a� N c m z a� L Q E O U O t .r c O 0 C �L d V a rn N ti M C L Q U t x w r c m E a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 104 6.D.d Capital Facilities Plan a E a� SECTION IV - INVENTORY OF FACILITIES N N a Table IV.1 shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OSPI-rated capacities. E Table IV.2 shows the number and location of each portable by school. The E district uses portable facilities to: Q 1. provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school populations that would otherwise require d w continual redistricting, U) 2. make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique students needs, and 3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be f nanced and constructed. U c ca Portable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often a place undesirable stress on existing physical plants. Core facilities (i.e. Z gymnasiums, restrooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc.) are not of suff cient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by a adding portable classrooms. 0 U t TABLE IV.1 PERMANENT FACILITIES INVENTORY 0 TABLE IV.2 PORTABLE FACILITIES INVENTORY L d DISTRICT SCHOOL FACILITIES MAP = B a M N ti M C L Q U t x w r c m E 0 a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 105 6.D.d Capital Facilities Plan TABLE IVA PERMANENT FACILITY INVENTORY E m BUILDING CAPACITY ACRES ADDRESS a Elementary Schools 0 Alpac Elementary 503 10.68 310 Milwaukee bopulevard North, Pacific, WA 98047 a Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 618 10.02 29205 132nd Street SE,Auburn, WA 98092 c Bowman Creek Elementary 812 22.03 5701 Kersey Way SE, Auburn, WA 98092 Chinook Elementary 806 12.37 3502 Auburn Way South, Auburn, WA 98092 E Dick Scobee Elementary 804 8.90 1031 104th Street NE,Auburn, WA 98002 Evergreen Heights Elementary 451 10.10 5602 South 316th,Auburn, WA 98001 E Gildo Rey Elementary 516 10.05 1005 37th Street SE,Auburn, WA 98002 m Hazelwood Elementary 580 13.08 11815 Southeast 304th Street, Auburn, WA 98092 E m Ilalko Elementary 578 14.23 301 Oravetz Place Sourtheast, Auburn, WA 98092 w Lake View Elementary 566 16.48 16401 Southeast 318th Street,Auburn, WA 98092 Lakeland Hills Elementary 580 12.00 1020 Evergreen Way SE,Auburn, WA, 98092 Lea Hill Elementary 798 20.24 30908 124th Avenue SE, Auburn, WA 98092 Ui Pioneer Elementary 816 11.50 2301 M Street SE,Auburn, WA 98002 r *Terminal Park Elementary on K Street 393 17.40 1825 K Street SE, Auburn, WA 98002 L) c Washington Elementary 501 5.33 20 E Street Northeast,Auburn, WA 98002 f° a Willow Crest Elementary 812 10.60 13002 SE 304th Street,Auburn, WA 98092 ELEMENTARY CAPACITY 10,134 m 'Terminal Park Elementary is being rebuilt students being housed at interim site for the 2022-23 school year. Reopens in September 2023. N L Q Middle Schools o U Cascade Middle School 823 16.94 1015 24th Street NE,Auburn, WA 98002 Mt. Baker Middle School 829 30 620 37th Street SE,Auburn, WA 98002 0 Olympic Middle School 989 17.45 839 21st Street SE, Auburn, WA 98002 c Rainier Middle School 830 25.54 30620 116th Ave SE, Auburn, WA 98092 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3,471 = 2 High Schools a Auburn High School 2,137 23.74 711 E Main Street, Auburn, WA 98002 rn Auburn Riverside High School 1,384 35.32 501 Oravetz Road, Auburn, WA 98092 M Auburn Mountainview High Schoc 1,437 39.42 28900 124th Ave SE, Auburn, WA 98092 L West Auburn High School 233 5.26 401 E Main Street, Auburn, WA 98001 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5,191 Q I U TOTAL CAPACITY 18,796 t x w r c m E 0 a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 106 6.D.d Capital Facilities Plan INVENTORY OF FACILITIES E TABLE IV. 2 PORTABLE FACILITES INVENTORY 0 Elementary Schools 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 N Alpac 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Q Arthur Jacobsen 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 c ca Bowman Creek 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Chinook 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 aD Dick Scobee 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evergreen Heights 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 E Gildo Rey 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 Q Hazelwood 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Ilalko 7 2 2 2 2 2 2 m E Lake View 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 m w Lakeland Hills 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 N Lea Hill 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 r Pioneer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Terminal Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Li Washington 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 -g Willow Crest 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 43 31 31 31 31 31 31 U TOTAL CAPACITY 874 630 630 630 630 630 630 d Middle Schools 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Cascade 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 c Mt. Baker 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 a� Olympic 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 a Rainier 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 E 0 TOTAL UNITS 35 39 39 39 39 39 39 U TOTAL CAPACITY 981 1,093 1,093 1,093 1,093 1,093 1,093 r c 0 High Schools 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Auburn High School 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 'L Auburn High School-*TAP 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 d Auburn Mountainview 8 12 12 12 12 12 12 = Auburn Riverside 17 18 18 18 18 18 18 West Auburn 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 a TOTAL UNITS 30 39 39 39 39 39 39 TOTAL CAPACITY 862 1,121 1,121 1,121 1,121 1,121 1,121 N ti *TAP-Transition Assistance Program for 18-21 year old students with special needs. c L COMBINED TOTAL UNITS 108 109 109 109 109 109 109 COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY 2,717 2,844 2,844 2,844 2,844 2,844 2,844 Q I U t x w r c m E r r a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 107 _ � y� - .. ..:w'-.. ` �p � � nJ f f. ire-:4 -.. ,•i' lop Auburn Mountainview HS. �._, • „ter rtliur Jacobsen ES Hazelwood yr- y �r •i'k �+J - �u ,. err Crest ES ascade MS !. z'• ti s; .t, _ •. Rainier M }" ick Scobee E Administration Buildin M Fi �y F y Auburn HSAlt ashingtor ES Park ES T F r•�,.. �I Ympic M k ES A ioneer ES w Gildo Rey ES Mt Baker MS r=�.#• Ipac ES Auburn Riversi Ilalko ES rc w wman Creek ES ' 72 eland Hills ES lj f o D o 00 ag (RE U@W Comm* 6.D.d Capital Facilities Plan a E a� SECTION V - STUDENT CAPACITY o N N a While the Auburn School District uses the OSPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from which to determine space needs, the District's E educational program requires more space than that provided for under the formula. This additional square footage is converted to numbers of students a in Section III, Standard of Service. The District's capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional space to house its programs. Changes in the capacity 2 of the district recognize new funded facilities. The combined effect of these N a� adjustments is shown on Line B in Tables V.l and V.2. Table V.l shows the District's capacity with portable units included and Table V.2 without these LL u n its. .Q Table V.1 Capacity with Portables c Table V.2 Capacity without Portables a .N L Q E O U O t .r c O tM C �L d V B a M N ti M C L Q U t x w r c m E a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 109 6.D.d Capital Facilities Plan a E a� Table VA Student Capacity with Portables O 2022.23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 N A. OSPI Capacity 18,796 19,224 19,224 19,224 19,224 19,224 19,224 A.1 OSPI Capacity- New Elementary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cOo A.2 OSPI Capacity- Replacements 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A.3 OSPI Capacity- New Middle School 0 0 0 0 800 0 0 -0 c m B. Capacity Adjustments E a 131. Portables 2,717 2,844 2,844 2,844 2,844 2,844 2,844 B2. Exclude Standard of Service (4,994) (4,994) (4,994) (4,994) (4,994) (4,994) (4,994) E w C. Net Capacity 16,519 17,074 17,074 17,074 17,874 17,074 17,074 U) 2 D. ASD Enrollment 17,059 17,344 17,454 17,577 17,702 17,822 18,000 0 U- E. ASD Surplus/Deficit -540 -270 -380 -503 172 -748 -926 a U c ca d a� .N c m t a� L Q E O U O t .r c O C L d V a rn N ti M C L Q U t x w r c m E a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 110 6.D.d Capital Facilities Plan a E a� Table V.2 Student Capacity without Portables O 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 N A. OSPI Capacity 18,796 19,224 19,224 19,224 19,224 19,224 19,224 A.1 OSPI Capacity- New Elementary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cOo A.2 OSPI Capacity- Replacements 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A.3 OSPI Capacity- New Middle School 0 0 0 0 800 0 0 -0 c m B. Capacity Adjustments E a 131. Exclude Standard of Service (4,994) (4,994) (4,994) (4,994) (4,994) (4,994) (4,994) E C. Net Capacity 13,802 14,230 14,230 14,230 15,030 14,230 14,230 m w U) D. ASD Enrollment 17,059 17,344 17,454 17,577 17,702 17,822 18,000 2 E. ASD Surplus/Deficit -3,257 -3,114 -3,224 -3,347 -2,672 -3,592 -3,770 Li R r .Q U c ca d a� .N c m t a� L Q E O U O t .r c O C L d V a rn N ti M C L Q U t x w r c m E a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 111 6.D.d Capital Facilities Plan a E a� SECTION VI - CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN 0 N N a The formal process used by the Auburn School Board to address current and future facility needs began almost 50 years ago in 1974. The process includes a formation of a community-wide citizen's committee and throughout the years, these Ad Hoc Committees have conducted work and made E recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and facilities. a In October of 2008, after two years of review and study, a Steering Committee E made recommendations to the Board regarding the capital improvements u, program to modernize or replace facilities as recommended by the 2004-05 U) Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee. These recommendations, based on specif c criteria, led to the Board placing a school improvement bond and capital U_ improvements levy on the ballot in March 2009. Voters did not approve either measure that would have updated 24 facilities and replaced three aging schools. The Board decided to place only a six-year Capital Levy on the ballot in November of 2009, which passed at 55.17%. The levy funded $46.4 million a of needed improvement projects at 24 sites over the following seven school years. Planning for the replacement of aging schools was started with educational specif cations and schematic design process for the replacement of Auburn High School. a E 0 The District acquired a site for a future high school in 2008 and a second site L) for a future middle school in 2009. The District also continued efforts to acquire property around Auburn High School. The Special Education 0 Transitional Assistance Program (TAP) opened in February of 2010. This facility is designed for students with disabilities that are 18 to 21 years old. x In the November 2012 election, the community supported the $110 million bond issue for the Auburn High School Modernization and Reconstruction a Project at 62%. Construction began in February 2013. The entire new building on was occupied by Auburn High School students and staff in the fall of 2015. M with site improvements being completed during the 2015-16 school year. L In January 2015, a citizen's ad hoc committee was convened by direction of a the Board to address growth and facilities. The major recommendations were to construct two new elementary schools in the next four years and to acquire 3 new elementary school sites as soon as possible. x w r c m E a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 112 6.D.d Capital Facilities Plan a E a� In the November 2016 election, the community supported the $456 million 1 bond issue for the replacement of six schools and the construction of two 0 LO new elementary schools at 62.83%. Construction for the replacement of a Olympic Middle School began in May 2018 and was completed in Fall 2019. Construction for Bowman Creek Elementary School began in May 2019 and was completed in Fall 2020. Construction for the replacement of Dick Scobee Elementary School began in June 2019 and was completed in Fall 2020. Construction for Willow Crest Elementary School and replacement of Pioneer Elementary School began in May 2020 and was completed in Fall 2021. a Construction for replacement of Chinook and Lea HIII Elementary Schools began in June 2021 and was completed in Fall of 2022. Construction for E replacement of Terminal Park Elementary School began in June 2022 and will w be completed in Fall of 2023. 2 The District anticipates running a Capital Bond Measure in 2024. Funds will U- be used to construct a new middle school on property currently owned by the District, and may include funds to replace one or more existing schools. The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years. The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in ; the school age population. L Q E 2023-29 Capital Construction Plan (May 2023) 0 aD Project Funded Projected Fund 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 Cost Source 0 a� Portable Yes $2,400,000 Impact ✓ L Relocation' Fees 0 m 2 Middle School#5' Yes $112,000,000 Bond ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 2 plan plan const const open .0 a Funds may be secured through a combination of a bond issue, impact fees, N and/or state matching funds L Q U t x w r c m E 0 a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 113 6.D.d Capital Facilities Plan a E a� SECTION VII - IMPACT FEES O N N a IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION (SPRING 2023) TABLES VI1.1-VI 1.4 E TABLES VI1.S &V11.6 E a IMPACT FEE ELEMENTS E a� w a� a_ R r .Q U c ca d a� .N c m t a� L Q E O U O t .r c O 0 C �L d V a rn N ti M C L Q U t x w r c m E a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 114 6.D.d Capital Facilities Plan a E IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION(Spring 2023) m ca Table VI1.1 SITE COST PER RESIDENCE v O Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/F ility Capacity))x Student Factor N Site Cost per Facility Student Generation Factor Cost per Cost per Q Acreage Acre Capacity Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Family Elementary(K-5) 15 $0 650 0.3030 0.4400 $0 $0 R Middle(6-8) 25 $0 800 0.1330 0.1500 $0 $0 y High 9-12 40 $0 1500 0.1510 0.1720 $0 $0 E $0 $0 E Table VI1.2 PERMANENT FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCE Q r Formula: ((Facility Cost/Student Capacity)x Student Factor))x Permanent-to-Total Square Footage Percents e d Facility Student %Perm Sq Ft/ Student Generation Factor Cost per Cost per E Cost Capacity Total Sa Ft Sin le Familv Multi Family Single Family Multi Family W Elementary(K-5) $0 650 0.9529 0.3030 0.4400 $0 $0 U) Middle(6-8) $143,000,000 800 0.9529 0.1330 0.1500 $22,654 $25,550 High 9-12 $0 1500 0.9529 0.1510 0.1720 $0 $0 v $22,654 $25,550 Li R r Table VI1.3 PORTABLES CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCE Q Formula: ((Facility Cost/Student Capacity)x Student Factor))x Portable-to-Total Square Footage Ratio 0 Facility Student %Port Sq Ft/ Student Generation Factor Cost per Cost per Cost Capacity Total Sq Ft Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Familyd Elementary(K-5) $250,000 20.33 0.0471 0.3030 0.4400 $175 $255 Middle(6-8) $250,000 28.02 0.0471 0.1330 0.1500 $56 $63 in c High 9-12 $250,000 28.74 0.0471 0.1510 0.1720 $62 $70 $293 $388 sZ Table VITA STATE MATCH CREDIT PER RESIDENCE E O Formula: (Boeckh Index x SPI Foots e x District Match x Student Factor) U N Boeckh OSPI State Student Generation Factor Cost per Cost per Index Footage Match Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi FamilyC Elementary(K-5) 90 64.58% 0.3030 0.4400 $0 $0 O of Middle(6-8) $246.83 108 64.58% 0.1330 0.1500 $2,290 $2,582 L High 9-12 130 64.58% 0.1510 0.1720 $0 $0 d $2,290 $2,582 = v V. TAX CREDIT PER RESIDENCE Formula: Expressed as the present value of an annuity d Tax Credit=Present Value(interest rate,discount period,average assessed value x tax rate) N ti Average Current Debt Bond Buyer Residential Number of Tax Credit Assessed Service Tax Index Annual Years Value Rate Interest Rate Single Family $573,704 $1.84 3.58% 10 $8,744 Q Multi Family $270,892 1 $1.84 1 3.58% 1 10 1 $4,129 1 UI t VI. DEVELOPER PROVIDED FACILITY CREDIT �I Formula: (Value of Site or Facility/Number of dwelling units) C O Value No.of Units Facility Credit Single Family $0.00 1 $0.00 Multi Family $0.00 1 $0.00 Q Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 115 Capital Facilities P Site Cost Projections + Purchase Adjusted Recent Property Acquisitions Acreage Purchase Year Purchase Price Cost per Acre Present Day Projected Annual Inflation Factor LL fC r Elementary#16 Parcel 1 1.26 2019 $480,000 $380,952 $508,200 2019 2020 2021 2022 $2,023 Q Elementary#16 Parcel 2 8.19 2019 $2,959,561 $361,363 $482,066 M 10% 5% 10% 10% 5% U Elementary#16 Parcel 3 0.80 2018 $460,000 $575,000 $843,771 Totals 10.25 Average Cost per Acre $513,509 d d IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION(Spring 2023) N C O FEE RECAP SUMMARY Single Multiple t Family Familyi Site Costs $0.00 $0.00 E Permanent Facility Construction Costs $22,654.41 $25,550.09 O Portable Facility Costs $293.14 $388.21 U d State Match Credit ($2,289.66) ($2,582.34) t Tax Credit $8,743.84 $4,128.67 FEE(No Discount) $11,914.04 $19,227.29 O a'l FEE(50%Discount) $5,957.02 $9,613.64 C Less ASD Discount $0.00 $0.00 M Facility Credit $0.00 $0.00 = Net Fee Obligation $5,957.02 $9,913.64 V 3 d N ti M C L 3 Q I U t K LU r C d E t v R r .r Q Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 116 Capital Facilities P 2 SINGLE FAMILY MULTI FAMILY O IMPACT FEE ELEMENTS Elementary Middle High Elementary Middle High LL K-5 6-8 9-12 K-5 6-8 9-12 a r Student Generation Factor 0.303 0.133 0.151 0.440 0.150 0.172 M New Facility Capacity 650 800 1500 650 800 1500 U c New Facility Cost-Middle School Cost Estimate May 2023 $143,000,000 $143,000,000 d Classroom Capacity-Grades K-5 @ 20.33,6-8 @ 28.02, &9- 12 @ 28.74 20.33 28.02 28.74 20.33 28.02 28.74 m Portable Costs-including site work,set up,and furnishing $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 > Site Acreage-ASD Standard or SPI Minimum 15 25 40 15 25 40 y Site Cost per Acre-table above $2,023 $2,023 $2,023 $2,023 $2,023 $2,023 a) Permanent Square Footage- 16 Elementary,4 Middle,and 4 High Schools 958,340 378,631 677,976 958,340 378,631 677,976 Q- Portable Facility Square Footage-24 x 864 SF+83 x 896 SF+TAP 2661 38,292 30,912 28,561 38,292 30,912 28,561 U Total Square Footage-Permanent+Portable 996,632 409,543 706,537 996,632 409,543 706,537 t Percent of Total-Permanent Facilities 96.16% 92.45% 95.96% 96.16% 92.45% 96.16% c Percent of Total-PortableFacilities 3.84% 7.55% 4.04% 3.84% 7.55% 4.04% O OSPI Square Footage Per Student-WAC 392-343-035 90 108 130 90 108 130 Boeckh Index-July 2022(2023 Amount Pending Legislature Budget Adoption) $246.83 $246.83 $246.83 $246.83 $246.83 $246.83 M OSPI State Match Percent-2022 64.58% 64.58% 64.58% 64.58% 64.58% 64.58% 2 District Match Percent-May 2023(computed) 35.42% 35.42% 35.42% 35.42% 35.42% 35.42% 2 District Average Assessed Value-King County May 2023 $573,704 $573,704 $573,704 $222,095 $222,095 $222,095 Debt Service Tax Rate-Current Fiscal Year 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 d General Obligation Bonds Interest Rate-Bond Buyer 20 Index Current Fiscal Year 3.58% 3.58% 3.58% 3.58% 3.58% 3.58% N ti M C L Q I U t K W a+ C d E t v r Q Auburn school District No.408 Packet Pg. 117 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 0 N Each Scholar: A voice.A dream. A BRIGHT future. N a a - b.y�cnr - W i r9 a pyt t r - - fA Lake Grove Elementary Mirror Lake Elementary Wildwood Elementary u_ .Q U ca d a, 0 Thomas Jefferson Star Lake Elementary/ Olympic View K-8 High School Everqreen Middle School W 0 a Cn s ti Memorial Field Renovation Illahee Middle School 0 Capital Facilities Plan u_ I 2024 x W E a Packet Pg. 118 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN as 0 0 0 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS a 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN May 12, 2023 E c as E a r c as E BOARD OF EDUCATION w N d a+ Trudy Davis, President Dr. Jennifer Jones, Vice President Luckisha Phillips, Legislative Representative c. Quentin Morris, WIAA Representative t� Hiroshi Eto a a m .y C d t d L CL E SUPERINTENDENT c0 a� Dr. Dani Pfeiffer 0 a� c �L d Prepared by: Ty Bergstrom, Chief Finance & Operations Officer, Interim Sally McLean, Facilitator Michael Swartz, Executive Director of Capital Projects a' Jennifer Thomas, Student& Demographic Forecaster N ti M fC fC L d V X W d E V Q Packet Pg. 119 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN as 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 2-3 c c as SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN E c as Introduction 4 E a Inventory of Educational Facilities 5 Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities 6 E Needs Forecast- Existing Facilities 7 w Needs Forecast-New Facilities 8 Six Year Finance Plan 9-10 SECTION 2 MAPS .Q Introduction 11 v Map—City and County Jurisdictions 12 a SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION > .y C Introduction 13 Building Capacities 14-16 Portable Locations 17-18 0 Student Forecast 19-21 a� SECTION 4 KING COUNTY, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, AND o CITY OF KENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS c Introduction 22 Capacity Summaries 23-27 = Impact Fee Calculations 28-29 Six Year Finance Plan 30-31 a' Student Generation Rates 32 Impact Fee Changes from 2023 to 2024 33 M fC fC L d V X W d E V Q Packet Pg. 120 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION 0 0 In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB) a 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 c as amended, City of Kent Ordinance No.4278 effective June 2018, revised December 2021, and the City of Auburn Ordinance No. 5078 effective 1998, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2023. E a This plan will be submitted for consideration to each of the jurisdictions located with the Federal Way Public Schools' service area: King County,the City of Kent,City of Federal Way and the City of Auburn and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by w reference. This plan is requested to be included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The City of Des Moines collects school impact fees as part of the SEPA process.Discussions with the City of Milton to adopt an ordinance for school impact fees for parcels located within the Federal Way School District's service area is in process. a 0 c.� The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted a and recommended to the King County Council for Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, c which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing,jobs, E services, culture, and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this 0 underlying assumption. Z This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which o requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended c to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies or management need. _ Currently Federal Way Public Schools is nearing the end of Phase 2 Bond projects a' supporting school expansion and replacement as authorized by the voters in 2017. Prior to the passage of the Phase 2 Bond the District formed a 100 member Facilities Planning Committee consisting of parents, community members and staff. This Committee was tasked with developing a recommendation to the Superintendent regarding Phase 2 of the District's plan for school construction, remodeling, and/or modernization for voter consideration in November 2017. The voters passed this $450M bond authorization with a 62%YES vote reflecting a commitment to invest in the modernization of our infrastructure. As of today, the District has completed Thomas Jefferson High School, Evergreen Middle School, Lake vi Grove Elementary, Mirror Lake Elementary, Star Lake Elementary, and Wildwood Elementary. Additionally, Olympic View K-8 is scheduled to open in Fall of 2023. Illahee Middle school is at the end of the Design Phase and set for Construction beginning June w 2023. Finally, Memorial Field is under construction with completion target of Fall 2023. as E 0 Packet Pg. 121 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION, continued 0 0 The rebuilding of the schools has and will continue create additional capacity for students at the elementary and high school levels. c c as The District continues to monitor factors that may have an impact on enrollment and capacity E at our schools, including new single-family and multi-family residential developments and any impacts due to the COVID-19. In accordance with the McCleary decision, the State has E a provided funding to reduce K-3 class size to 17 and 4-12 class size to 25. Beginning in 2019-20 the legislature expected compliance with this funding adding pressure to the need E for elementary capacity. In response to this need the district has acquired a commercial °' w building to renovate into classrooms to provide permanent additional capacity. The COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected brick and mortar enrollment in recent years, as well as increased enrollment in the Internet Academy. However, the district's 2022-23 enrollment was higher than projected and has continued to grow throughout the current a school year. As we move farther away from the effects of COVID-19, we expect to see continued enrollment growth, especially considering the City of Federal Way's plans to increase housing in the downtown core in conjunction with Sound Transit's Link Light Rail a development. .y C The District has increased capacity at the elementary level over the past several years and shows no unhoused scholars based on the six-year enrollment projections (even with a projected growth at that level). The 2024 Capital Facilities Plan does reflect growth at the 0 high school level over the six-year planning period and, with the recent addition at Thomas Jefferson High School and the addition of portable facilities, the District is able to house new Z scholars at the high school level. As a result, school impact fees are appropriate to assist in o offsetting costs of adding increased instructional spaces. c L d V IL c� N ti M fC fC L d V X W d E V Q Packet Pg. 122 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN as 2 SECTION 1 - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN c The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. c c as This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and E expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. A Financial Plan that shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization listed follows E a this. as E as w N d a+ O LL O .Q O V C O a m .y C d t d L CL E O U O t .r c O C �L d V a c� N ti M fC fC L d V X W d E V Q Packet Pg. 123 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN as 2 INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES c ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS(K-5) Q Adelaide 1635 SW 304' St Federal Way 98023 Brigadoon 3601 SW 336" St Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 298 h St Auburn 98001 Enterprise 35101 5'Ave SW Federal Way 98023 � c Green Gables 32607 47'Ave SW Federal Way 98023 E Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308'h St Auburn 98001 Q Lake Grove 303 SW 308'h St Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35827 32'Ave S Auburn 98001 E Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Rd Federal Way 98003 Meredith Hill 5830 S 300'h St Auburn 98001 Mirror Lake 625 S 314' St Federal Way 98003 Nautilus(K-8) 1000 S 289' St Federal Way 98003 Olympic View(K-8) 2626 SW 327 h St Federal Way 98023 U- Panther Lake 34424 lst Ave S Federal Way 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368th St Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 34600 12'Ave SW Federal Way 98023 v Silver Lake 1310 SW 325th PI Federal Way 98023 M Star Lake 26812 40'Ave S,B1dg.13 Kent 98032 � Sunnycrest 24629 42°d Ave S Kent 98032 >_ Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320th St Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42°d Ave S Auburn 98001 m Wildwood 2405 S 300' St Federal Way 98003 Q. Woodmont(K-8) 26454 16th Ave S Des Moines 98198 E MIDDLE SCHOOLS (6-8) v Federal Way Public Academy(6-10) 34620 9'Ave S Federal Way 98003 Illahee 36001 1st Ave S Federal Way 98003 c Kilo 4400 S 308th St Auburn 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 314" St Federal Way 98023 Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Rd Federal Way 98003 Sequoyah 3450 S 360'b ST Auburn 98001 Evergreen 26812 40'Ave S,B1dg.A Kent 98032 TAF @ Saghal1e (6-12) 33914 19'Ave SW Federal Way 98023 a' HIGH SCHOOLS (9-12) Decatur 2800 SW 320'h St Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 30611 16'Ave S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288 h St Auburn 98001 Todd Beamer 35999 16'h Ave S Federal Way 98003 Career Academy at Truman 31455 28'Ave S Federal Way 98003 ADDITIONAL SCHOOLS Internet Academy(K-12) 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 U- Employment Transition Program(12+) 33250 2l't Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Federal Way Open Doors 31455 28'Ave S Federal Way 98003 ES24 (Former DeVry Property) (K-8) 3600 S 344th Way, Federal Way 98001 w c a� E z Q Packet Pg. 124 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN as 2 CURRENT INVENTORY NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES c Developed Property c Central Kitchen 1214 S 332nd St Federal Way 98003 Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308th St Federal Way 98003 E Educational Services Center 33330 8th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Support Services Center 1211 S 332nd St Federal Way 98003 E c d E Leased Property w m Early Learning Center at Uptown 1066 S 320t" St Federal Way 98003 Square w .Q c.� Undeveloped Property a Site Location # as z m L 75 SW 360th Street& 3rd Avenue SW—9.2 Acres �- 65 S 351st Street& 52nd Avenue S—8.8 Acres 0 60 E of loth Avenue SW- SW 334th& SW 335th Streets - 10.04 Acres d 73 N of SW 320th and east of 45th PL SW—23.45 Acres 71 S 344th Street& 46th Avenue S - 17.47 Acres 82 15t Way S and S 342nd St—Minimal acreage 96 S 308th St and 14th Ave S— .36 Acres as x Notes: a Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in M the District. L d U_ V x w d E V Q Packet Pg. 125 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN as 2 NEEDS FORECAST -EXISTING FACILITIES c Q ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF PHASE EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS FUNDS ca As Purchase and Relocate Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is needed Portables Impact Fees. E II Thomas Jefferson High Replaced Existing Building, Voter Approved Capital bond School Increased Capacity E Illahee Middle School Replace Existing Building Voter Approved Capital bond Q II � m II Evergreen Middle School Replaced Existing Building Voter Approved Capital bond m w Lake Grove Elementary Replaced Existing Building, Voter Approved Capital bond II Increased Capacity Mirror Lake Elementary Replaced Existing Building, Voter Approved Capital bond II Increased Capacity w II Olympic View K-8 School Replaced Existing Building, Voter Approved Capital bond a Increased Capacity II Star Lake Elementary Replaced Existing Building, Voter Approved Capital bond Increased Capacitya II Wildwood Elementary Replace Existing Building, Voter Approved Capital bond Increase Capacityy II Memorial Stadium Replace Existing Facility Voter Approved Capital bond m L II ES24 (DeVry Property) Temp Swing School SCAP and K-3 Class size E Increase Capacity reduction funding v Mark Twain Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD,pending SCAP funding Increase Cap ity c Decatur High School Replace Existing Building, TBD ° III � Increase Capacity5 'L Kilo Middle School Replace Existing Building TBD III = BI Sacajawea Middle School Replace Existing Building TBD Adelaide Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD a BI Increase Capacity as N III Brigadoon Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD c~ Increase Cap ity >, Camelot Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD BI Increase Capacity III Lake Dolloff Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD Increase Capacity u_ Nautilus K-8 School Replace Existing Building, TBD III v Increase Capacity }' III Twin Lakes Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD Increase Capacityw III Woodmont K-8 School Replace Existing Building, TBD Increase Capacity E E z Q Packet Pg. 126 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST -ADDITIONAL FACILITIES O NEW FACILITY LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS Q c c� FWPS has leased a portion of the Truman Campus property to Region X and Puget Sound Education Service District. Region X and PSESD built a Head Start building on this property E which has served Federal Way 3- and 4-year-olds for the last twenty years. In the recent re- competition, the federal funding for a Head Start program at this location was lost. E Subsequently the District has been using this facility for a state-funded Early Childhood r c Education (ECEAP) program and is currently in negotiations to secure title to the building. The building will only be available for preschool activities. w N FWPS is also concluding negotiations with King County Metro to secure the Redondo Park & Ride site for the relocation of Mark Twain Elementary school, which has been impacted by the construction of Sound Transit's Federal Way Link Extension. Construction of a w replacement school is slated to be part of the next school construction bond, or Phase 3. a c M a m .y C d t d L CL E O U O t .r c O C L d V a CD N ti M fC fC L d V X w d E V Q Packet Pg. 127 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN as Six Year Finance Plan o Secured Funding Sources o Impact Fees LI $142,000 N Land Sale Funds 2 $3,820,000 Q Bond or Levy Funds 3 $80,798,000 'a K3-Class Size Reduction 4 $11,692,000 O t4 School Construction Assistance Pro ram SCAP 5 $73 877 000 TOTAL $162,689,000 y Projected Revenue Sources School Construction Assistance Pro ram SCAP 6 $22,300,000 O d K-3 Class Size Reduction L7 $486,000 E Bond Funds 8 $0 Q Land Fund Sales 9 $0 Impact Fees 10 $3,500,000 G1 TOTAL $26,286,000 E Actual and Planned Expenditures IlTotal Secured Funding and Projected Revenue $188,975,000 LU N d NEW SCHOOLS Estimatedand Budget 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total Total +, Prior Years 2023-24 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 2028-2029 2029-2030 2023-2030 MODERNIZATION AND EXPANSIONLL O Lake Grove Elementary(11) $39,500,000 $0 $39, )0 Mirror Lake Elementary(11) $41,800,000 $0 $41, +�+ )0 Star Lake Elementary(11) $38,838,000 $0 $38, )0 W ildwood Elementary(11) $40,900,000 $0 $40; C) )0 Olympic View K-8 School(11) $47,450,000 $0 $47, )0 Thomas Jefferson High School(11) $124,787,000 $0 $124, )0 Evergreen Middle School(11) $66,129,000 $0 $66, (1 )0 IDahee Middle School(11) $27,848,000 $50,843,000 $9,309,000 $60,152,000 $88; •y )0 Memorial Stadium(11) $28,821,000 $2,979,000 $2,979,000 $31, )0 $0 = 60 $0 CLRO — SII'EACQUISII'ION O U Former DeVry/ES 24(12) $27,470,000 $1,421,000 $1,423,000 $1,422,000 $1,424,000 $1,422,000 $1,423,000 $8,535,000 $36, d )0 t TFMPORARYFACILITIES O O Portables 13 $3,500,000 1 $500,0001 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $5 0,0001 $500,0001 $500,0001 $3,500,000 $7; 0))0 TOTAL 1 $487,043,00U1 $55,743,000 1 $11,232,0001 $1,922,000 $1,924,0001 $1,922,0001 $1,923,000 $SOQ)00 $75,166,000 $562, )0 L d V a c� N ti M fC fC L d LL V x I1J d E V Q Packet Pg. 128 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN as 2 SIX YEAR FINANCE PLAN,CON'T 0 NOTES: N 1. These fees are currently being held in a King County, City of Federal Way, City ofAuburn, and City of Kent impact fee N account,and will be available for use by the District for system improvements. This is yearend balance on 12131122. Q 2. This is yearend balance on 12131122. c 3. This is the 12131122 balance of bond funds and capital levy funds. This figure includes interest earnings. 4. This represents the K3-CSR revenue received but not spent as of 1213112022. y 5. This represents the balance of SCAP funding but no spent as of 1213112022. E 6. This is anticipated SCAP for the future projects authorized by the voters in 2017. 7. This is the remaining K-3 Class size reduction grant revenue. d 8. In November 2017, the District passed a$450M bond measure. The amount included in the finance plan is for projects Q that will create additional capacity. Only the costs associated with increasing capacity are included in school impact fee calculations. m 9. There are no projected sale ofsurplus properties. E 10.In this current plan, there are no projected impact fees. W 11.Project budgets are updated as of December 2022. The budget for Illahee Middle School is still being updated. N 12. A former private university campus located in Federal Way was purchased in 2019 to provide up to 43 additional d permanent elementary classrooms. Prior to creating new permanent capacity this location will be used as a temporary = housing. These costs are excluded from impact fee calculations. 13. These fees represent the cost of purchasing and installing new portables. The portable expenditure in future years may U- replace existing portables that are not functional. These may not increase capacity and are not included in the capacity ca summary. C. ca t� C O a > .y C d t L C� G O U O .r c O C 'L d V a c� N ti M fC fC L d V X W d E V Q Packet Pg. 129 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 2 -MAPS 0 0 As of September 2023,Federal Way Public Schools has twenty elementary schools(grades K- a 5), three schools with a K-8 grade configuration, six middle school schools (grades 6-8), four high schools (grades 9-12) and four small secondary schools. The Federal Way Public c Academy serves students in grades 6-10. The programs at Open Doors and Career Academy at Truman High School serves students in grades 9-12. In addition to these programs, E TAF@Saghalie serves students in grades 6-12 who reside within the service area and the Employment and Transition Program (ETP) at the Norman Center serves 18-21-year-old E a scholars. r c d E The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility w infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School districts are different. If the district does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. a 0 c.� It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the a district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around > a single development. c z m Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the district and is not taken lightly. It E is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. 0 Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. Z The final map included represents the city and county boundaries which overlap with the o district's service areas. c • City of Algona • City of Auburn = • City of Des Moines • City of Federal Way a' • City of Kent a� N • City of Milton M • Unincorporated King County 0 L d U- V X W d E V Q Packet Pg. 130 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN MAP—CITY AND COUNTY JURISDICTIONS 0 0 0 FEDERAL WAY Q PUBLIC SCHOOLS Each 5cholar A voice-A dream.A BRIGHT iubure. E C d Q Des IJ I w -. mAoines w Puget Sound ALJL)4111-11 i L k _� sZ 0 i as Z 0 _ Federal Way c � d - y .2 Algona N ti King Count l� L _ LL I 11 V Mi ikon z K w City and County 0 0.5 1 2Miles Jurisdictions t FWPS boundaries is 100%Urban Growth Area Q Packet Pg. 131 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN as 2 0 O SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION a c Building Capacities - The Education Program E Portable Locations E a Student Forecast—2023 through 2029 a� E a� w N d a+ O LL O .Q O V C O a m .y C d t d L E O U O t .r c O C �L d V a c� N ti M fC fC L d V x W d E V Q Packet Pg. 132 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING CAPACITIES 0 0 This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to N ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction a establishes square footage guidelines for capacity,but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. as E In general, the District's current target class size provides that the average class size for a c standard classroom for grades K through 3 should be 17 students to comply with current E legislation. In grades 4-5 the target is 25 students. For grades 6 to 12 the target class size is 26 a students. Classrooms for students with Individualized Education Program(Special Education) needs are calculated at 12 seats per classroom. a� w Historically, the District has used the OSPI square footage calculation as a baseline for capacity calculation and made adjustments for specific program needs. The District will continue to use this calculation for determining capacity at our middle and high schools. However, for elementary school capacity will be calculated based on the number of classroom spaces and the number of students assigned to each classroom. c.� c 0 IL Class Size FWPS Historical HB2661/SHB2776 Square Footage Guidelines "Standard of Service" Enacted Law Guideline Kindergarten 18.9 17 25-28 z Grades 1-2 18.9 17 25-28 i a Grade 3 18.9 17 28 E 0 Grades 4-5 25 25 28 v d Grades 6-12 26 26 28 Z c 0 a� c For the purposes of determining student capacity at individual schools, the following list clarifies adjustments to classroom spaces and the OSPI calculation. x Special Education Resource Rooms: 0 IL Each middle school requires the use of a standard classroom(s) for special education students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. M English as a Second Language Programs: Each middle school and high school require the use of a standard classroom for students learning English as a second language. as Middle School Computer Labs: "i Each middle school has computer labs, except Evergreen Middle School. Wireless access has been installed at all secondary schools. If additional classroom space is needed, these computer labs may be converted to mobile carts. w c as E 0 Packet Pg. 133 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN as 2 BUILDING CAPACITIES, continued c High School Career Development and Learning Center (Resource) Room: Each high school provides special education resource room and career c development classrooms for students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. E c as PreschooVECEAP: E a Our district currently offers preschool programs for both special needs & typically developing students at 9 elementary schools. We also have the ECEAP E program at 10 sites (6 elementary schools, 3 high schools, and I commercial sites). w These programs decrease capacity at those schools. Alternative Learning Experience: Federal Way offers students the opportunity to participate in an Alternative Learning Experience through our Internet Academy. These students have never been a included in the capacity calculation of unhoused students. v c M 1418 Youth Reengagement: a Federal Way offers students the opportunity to participate in 1418 Youth Reengagement Open Doors program. These students are housed at the Truman c campus but are not currently included in the capacity calculation of unhoused students. a E O U O t .r c O C L d V IL c� N ti M fC fC L d LL V X w d E V Q Packet Pg. 134 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING CAPACITIES, continued 0 0 Q ELE-NIENTARY BUILDL�G 'ADDLE SCHOOL BUILDL�G PROGRAM CAPACITY PROGRAM CAPACITY .r c School Name Headcount 'Preschool School Name Headcount E Adelaide 392 30 Mahee 855 d Brigadoon 403 30 Kilo 779 E Camelot 378 30 Lakota 7$6 Q Enterprise 524 15 Saca a-vea 694 Green Gables 439 Sequoyah 585 E m Lake Dolloff 535 Evergreen 795 w 'Lake Grove 589 TAF Saghalie 598 � Lakeland 455 Federal Way Public Academy- 1$3 .Mark Dwain 515 TOTAL 5,275 � Meredith Hill 606 30 3 irror Lake 514 30 7NEddle School Average 727 a Nautilus(K-S) 512 V 0h-mpic View(K-S) 429 HIGH SCHOOL BLILDLIG 0 M Panther Lake 501 PROGRAM CAPACITY a Rainier View 607 30 Sherwood Forest 451 6 School Name Headcount y c Silver Lake 476 Decatur 1243 Star Lake 544 30 Federal Way 1684 Sunnvcrest 636 Thomas Jefferson 1600 Q' E T"in Lakes 413 30 Todd Btamer 1085 0 L) Valhalla 598 TAF �& Saghalie 155 m t 'Wildwood 597 30 Career Academe at Truman 159 woodmont -8 474 Federal Wav Public Academe 116 0 TOTAL 11,592 291 Employment Transition Program 48 c L TOTAL 6,090 Elemeutai A erage 504High Schaal Ave ra ge 1,403 0 a Notes: 'Preschool enrollment reduces capacity far K-5 students_ 13 preschool students in one classroom_ 'Federal Wad Public Academe,Career Academe at Truman High School,and Employment Transition Program and T. F a;Saghalie for the high school school grade span(9-12)are non-boundary.schools. These schools are not used in the >+ - 0 calculated averages. Lake Grove and Wildywood opened January 2 02 1:Mirror Lake is opened September 2021 i m U- I t� t K W r-� C N E t c� r r Q Packet Pg. 135 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN as 2 PORTABLE LOCATIONS c The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not an efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students c due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. E c as Portables are used as interim measures to house students when increasing population impacts E a a school attendance area. Portables may also be required to house students when new or changing programs require additional capacity. They also provide housing for students until E permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. When permanent facilities become w available,the portable(s)is either used for other purposes such as storage or childcare programs or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. .Q With the school expansion projects funded through the 2017 Bond, new capacity has been created within the new schools and portables have been eliminated from these campuses. a The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities,used for educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. c d L CL G O U O t .r c O C L d V a CD N ti M fC fC L d LL V X W d E V Q Packet Pg. 136 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS, continued 0 0 Q PORTABLESLOCATED PORTABLESLOCATED AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS AT HIGH SCHOOLS .r NON NON d INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL' INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL E Adelaide 1 2 Decatur 8 1 E Bri adoon 1 Federal WayQ r Thomas Camelot 1 Jefferson E Enterprise 3 Todd Beamer 8 w Green Gables 1 LTOTAL 16 1 w m Lake Dolloff 5 1 =_ Lake Grove 0 Lakeland U- Mark Twain 3 a 0 Meredith Hill 3 PORTABLESLOCATED c Mirror Lake AT SUPPORT FACILITIES a Nautilus 3 Olympic View MOT Panther Lake 4 TDC 9 z Rainier View 5 Former TAFA a Sherwood Forest 2 4 TOTAL 9 0 Silver Lake 1 3 V Star Lake z Z Sunn crest DISTRICT PORTABLES IN USE FOR c y 6 ECEAP a� Twin Lakes 1 2 AND/OR HEADSTART �L Valhalla 4 Sherwood Forest 1 Wildwood Evergreen = Woodmont 3 Total 0 TOTAL 47 12 a as N PORTABLESLOCATED M AT MIDDLE SCHOOLS 0 NON INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL L d Illahee m a_ Kilo 1 6 V Lakota Saca'awea 5 :2 z Se uo ah 1 1 ij Evergreen *� c TAF Sa halie 4 a) E TOTAL 11 7 0 Q Packet Pg. 137 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN as 2 STUDENT FORECAST c Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development and facility need. Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget c preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made based E on projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. E a r c Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals, grade level w and program level to include vocational and special education students. The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not v trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The c district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study a several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on birth rates within the district's census tracts and treats these statistics as a cohort for a kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. c L) The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. c c In January 2022, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District. The model used to forecast next year's enrollment uses cohort survival = rates to measure grade to grade growth, assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county-wide average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to a net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections. The long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes in the 5-19 age group for King County. L d V X W d E V Q Packet Pg. 138 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN as 2 STUDENT FORECAST, CON'T 0 The last demographer update was completed prior to the City of Federal Way's Housing Action Plan. The enrollment projections below have been updated to include anticipated c new student growth generated from the planned development. .................................................................................................................................v.................................................v.................................................v.................................................v......................... E s5"mglefaFfflW Homes i ES MS HS ESSGR MSSGR H33GR Total3GR :The Woodland at Redondo Creek 2023¢.........6 ........ ........11....... 5 5 0.1542 0-0746 a.DgR6 o.3284 ................................................................................................................................. ................................................ ........................:........................a........................:........................a........................: Q .. ..... ...................................... 0:05U0 0-100 o owsWestH!�� Plat 2023 0 1 0:150 ........... ...... ....... ........ ....... c :South Campus Estates 2024 10 2 1 1 010W 0.1000 01000 0.4000 i ................................................................................................................................ ................................................ ........................:........................a........................:........................a........................: :Twin Ta i Is 2024 38 6 3 4 0.1579 0-0789 01053 0.3421 .......................................................................................................a................................................a................................................a........................:.......................a................................................a W s 1st Ave Tow n h om es 2025 135 23 9 13 0.1704 0L0667 s 0-09 .3.m 63 0 to ................................................................................................................................ ................................................ ........................:........................a........................:........................a........................: d :Dian Singh Townhomes 2025 18 3 1 2 0.1667 s o.o555 o.1111 0.3.m ....................................................................................................... ................................................ ................................................a........................:........................a........................:........................a sSummit at Steel Lake 2025 s 24 4 2 2 o.1667 ao833 o.o833 0.3.m ........................................................................................................:........................¢........................:........................ ........................:........................a........................:........................a........................: :Upland Federal Way 2025 8 1 1 1 0.1250 0.1250 0-12.50 s 0.3750 LL a........................':........................a................................................a........................:........................a........................:..................... - to VSM Plat 2025............................................................... 11...... ........ 1....... 1........ .0:.1818 0:0909 0:0909 0-%W..< C. Aid erViIIage2026 84 14 6 8 o.1667 0.0714 0-0952 0.3333 .......................................................................................................a................................................a................................................a........................:........................a........................:........................ a t� sCreeksideCommons Tow nhomes2025s 94 16 6 9 01702 0.0638 0-0957 0.3298 C ........................................................................................................:........................ ................................................ ........................:........................a................................................a........................: Kislyak Short Plat 2026 6 1 0 1 0.1667 0.0000 0.1667 0333i d ....................................................................................................... ................................................ ................................................a........................:........................a........................:........................a Totals 515 86 35 50 01705 0.0682 0.0958 0.3340 ........................................................................................................:........................n................................................n........................:........................n........................:........................n........................: - '3'n;'e family Student Generation Rates current as of 5f 1f 23 used to project the number of students per R.rcpcsed development. .......................................................................................................:........................v........................:........................v................................................v................................................v........................: sMultifamilyr-AffordableHousing Units s ES MS HS ESSGR s MSSGR HSSGR -Tot Q .......................................................................................................a. ;..................... SilverShadows2024 202 144 s 74 74 s 0-7129 0.3663 s 0.3663 1.4455 s ¢........................:........................¢........................:........................¢........................:........................¢........................: O Beckett 360 256 132 132 0-7111 0.3667 s 0.3667 1.44-04 V .......................................................................................................a................................................a................................................a........................:........................a........................:........................a G� :Celebration Park Apts.2026 345 245 126 126 0.7101 0.3652 0.3fii52 14406 ................................................................................................................................ ................................................ ........................:........................a........................:........................a........................: :Total 907 645 332 332 0.7104 0- 65 0..3565 1A432 ....................................................................................................... ................................................ ................................................ ........................:........................ ........................:........................: O 1Multi-family(Affordable Houseing)Student Generation Rates current as of 5f 1f 23 used to project the number of students per proposed development. .......................................................................................................v. ......................................v..................... .................. .................................................v .................. ........................., :Multi family. Market Rate U n its ES MS HS ES SG R MS SG R s HSSGR Total SE R: 2 ........................................................................................................:........................a................................................ ........................:........................a.................................................¢........................: :Federal Way Mixed Use2023 240 29 15 23 0.1222 0.0625 0.0942 0.2J92 v .......................................................................................................a........................':........................a................................................a........................:........................a........................:........................ - Total: 240 29 15 23 0.1356 0.1073 0-1808 01792 s ........................................................................................................:........................n................................................n........................:........................n........................:........................n........................: a 1Multi-family(Market-rate)Student Generation Rates from last market-rate development(Brookside, 2009) used to project the number of students per proposed development. M fC fC L d u_ �♦I V x W d E V Q Packet Pg. 139 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN as 2 STUDENT FORECAST, CON'T c October 1 Head Count Enrollment History and Projections Percent E Calendar Yr School Year Elementary Middle School High School Total K-12 Change d 2018 201748 10,418 5,159 6,501 22,078 E 2019 201849 10,158 5,115 6,674 21,947 2020 2019-20 9,953 5,309 6,516 21,778 0.8% 2021 2020-21 9,192 4,990 6,385 20,567 -5.6% O 2022 2021-22 9,062 4,850 6,393 20,305 -1.3% W 2023 2022-23 9,317 4,719 6,532 20,568 1.3% d 2024 B2023-24 9,452 4,789 6,473 20,714 0.7% 2025 P2024-25 9,613 4,872 6,558 21,044 1.6% LL 2026 P2025-26 9,695 4,913 6,569 21,176 0.6% 2027 P2026-27 9,743 4,935 6,559 21,238 0.3% Q. 2028 P2027-28 9,782 4,955 6,586 21,322 0.4% V 2029 P2028-29 9,860 4,995 6,638 21,493 0.8% c 2029 P2029-30 9,949 5,040 6,698 21,687 0.9% d ElementaryK-5 Middle School 6-8 High School 9-12 Includes Open Doors and Internet Academy d z Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast M 23,000 O t� d t 22,500 a C O 22,000 L d 21,500 = v 21,000 d a� 20,500 M 20,000 19,500 ` d O LL 19,000 V L3 School Year K W Series2 C N E t c� O r r Q Packet Pg. 140 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN STUDENT FORECAST, continued 0 0 Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a a constant percent of something else (e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend for the school-age population over time. The report included 5 different c calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2029. This model produces a projection that is between 19,500 and 21,000 when applied to the low, E medium, and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models. E a c Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort E survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the w projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington. a 0 c.� Near term projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by current local economic conditions. The District tracks new development from five permitting a jurisdictions. Long range planning assumes a student yield from proposed new housing consistent with historical growth patterns. c z m Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The E Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions 0 comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school district community in the future. Z c 0 The COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected brick and mortar enrollment in recent years, as c well as increased enrollment in the Internet Academy. The district's 2022-23 enrollment was higher than projected. As we move farther away from the effects of COVID-19, we hope to = see continued enrollment growth, especially considering the City of Federal Way's plans to increase housing in the down-town core in conjunction with Sound Transit's Link Light Rail a' development. We took a conservative look at residential developments in-progress and pre- application phase that were not taken into consideration with previous demographic studies because they were unknown at the time of the study. 0 L d V x W d E V Q Packet Pg. 141 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN as 2 SECTION 4—KING COUNTY, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,AND CITY OF KENT c IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS a c Capacity Summaries E Site & Construction Costs Allocations E a Student Generation Rates a� E Impact Fee Calculations w N d Reference to Impact Fee Calculations LL .Q c.� c M a m .y C d t d L CL E O U O t .r c O C �L d V a c� N ti M fC fC L d LL V x W d E V Q Packet Pg. 142 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARIES 0 O All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and High Schools a The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information, Portable Capacity c information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. as E a The District has recently adjusted its capacity calculation method for Elementary schools to better show capacity needed to comply with the K-3 Class Size Reduction. This adjustment is also shown in the portable capacity calculation. In order to allow for flexibility in portable w usage the District will use an average class size calculation of 21 for each Elementary portable and an average class size of 25 for each Middle and High School portable. The information is organized with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, middle school, and high school levels a individually. v c M The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in a place each year. .y C d t d L CL E O U O t .r c O C L d V a c� N ti M fC fC L d LL V X W d E V Q Packet Pg. 143 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued 2 0 Capacity Summary-All Grades N Q Actual Budget -- Projected-- c� Calendar Year 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 CAPACITY ISchoolYear 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 E E BUILDING PROGRAM c HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 22,592 22,957 22,957 22,957 23,569 23,569 23,569 23,569 E Q r Add Capacity 365 0 0 612 0 0 0 0 E 0 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 22,957 22,957 22,957 23,569 23,569 23,569 23,569 23,569 w w m ENROLLMENT Basic Headcount Enrollment 20,568 20,714 21,044 21,176 21,238 21,322 21,493 21,642 LL Internet Academy Headcount Enrollments (255) (255) (255) (255) (255) (255) (255) (255) �o Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 20,313 20,459 20,789 20,921 20,983 21,067 21,238 21,387 V SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) M PROGRAM FTE CAPACITY 2,644 2,498 2,168 2,648 2,586 2,502 2,331 2,182 a m .y C d RELOCATABLE CAPACITY L Current Portable Capacity 1,685 1,685 1,643 1,645 1,697 1,749 1,801 1,853 Q- 0 Add/Subtract Portable Capacity 0 (42) 2 52 52 52 52 52 m z Adjusted Portable Capacity 1,685 1 1,643 1 1,645 1 1,697 1 1,749 1 1,801 1 1,853 1 1,905 0 a� c SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) c`o d PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE _ CAPACITY 4,329 4,141 3,813 4,345 4,335 4,303 4,184 4,087 2 Z a NOTES: as N ti 1 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities.This represents historic enrollment. L d LL V x W d E V Q Packet Pg. 144 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued as Capacity Summary Elementary Schools o Q Actual B et Calendar Year 2A23 2024 mi 2026 2A27 2A28 2029 2030 � c� CAPACfT3i School Year 2022-23 2A23-24 2024-2i 2023-26 2026-27 2M7-28 2028-29 2029-3o BU ING PROGRAM HE.kD COUNT CAPACM 11,065 11,193 11,193 11,193 11,805 ��,SuS 11,805 11,805 C d Add.Subtract capacity total 128 4 • 612 • 0 0 • Q Add ca city-at r 1 _ c De f i�'3107.Lake . .6 . . E E Ad usted Program Headoount Capacity 11,193 11,193 1 11,193 1 11,905 1 11,805 11,805 11,S05 11,8o3 m ENROLIAfENT v Basic Headoount Enrollment 3. : -_ 9,617 9_G99 9,747 9,796 9,964 9,953 LL Internet Academy"Headcount- (2.0) (2.0) {20) (20) k'u) (20) Basic Headoount Enrollment mrithout Internet Academy 9,297 9,436 9J91 9-679 9,727 9,7M 9,FM 9,933 V SLT,PLUS OR(L-MOUSED) c�a PROGI kXf CAPACTT3i I'96 1,767 1,596 2,126 2,078 2,039 1,%1 1.8 d a� RELOCATABLE CAPACITY: w c Current PortableCapacit�, 931 931 M 999 999 999 S89 SSA z Admi Subtract portable capacity (42) • 0 • 0 0 0 Add portable capacity at: E 0 Subtract portable capacity at: Pa 1 _ C) Lake Grove d t �lrror Itrk +• Star£irk O w2khVood c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L .:. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjusted Portable Ca city 931 889 8$9 S$9 ng U9 U9 SS- 2 v SLT,PLGS OR(U_YHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCAT ABLE 3 CAPACHT"Y L827 2�W 2,485 3,015 2,567 2,928 2A% 2,761 d as N MOTES: M 1 Capacity increases are projected based on a design t o aoccvmrbodate 525 students.Increased capacity is currently-stated as the difference berwem current calculated capacity and the proj ect ed design.In order to reduce elementary class size_Derry-capacity-is calculated at 17 scholars per classroom. L 2 Internet Academy-student s are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities.This represents historic enrollment. 3 Relocatable Capacity-is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house UI students until permanent facilities are available.This is a calculated number only-based on class size capacity of 21.The actual number of portables +, that will be used will be based on actual student population neDds. z K W r-� C N E t c� r r Q Packet Pg. 145 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN as 2 CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued o Capacity Summary—Middle Schools c Actual Budget -- Pro j ected-- � d Calendar Year 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 E CAPACITY ISchoolYear 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2020-27 2027-28 2028r29 2029-30 d BUILDING PROGRAM Q HEADCOUNT C_-LPA= 5,074 5,074 5,074 5,074 5,074 5,074 5,074 5,074 Add-.-Subtract capacity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m Add capacity at: Ev yggeera W a N 171ahee d Adjusted Pro He Ca aci 5,074 5.074 5,074 5,074 5,074 5,074 5,074 5,074 .v ENROLLAHNT W Basic Headcount Enrollment 4,719 4,800 4,883 4,R23 4- :N-6 4,W 5,005 5,005 Q Internet Academy' {55} (33) {55; (55) (55) {55} (33) Basic Enrollment without Internet Academv 4,664 4,745 4,828 4.868 4_891 4,911 4,950 4 50 a SLMPLUS OR(UNH OUSED) PROOR.AM CAPAC= 410 329 246 206 183 163 124 124 w c d z d L RELOCATABLE C AP-xcrrY E E Current Portable Capacity- 338 338 339 ?SS 289 288 288 288 0 Add-Subtract portable capacity 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 t Ever a eery_Virddle School Sacajawea_ufddle School O 171ahee Airddle School f v 0+ � Adjusted Portable Capacity 338 338 288 288 288 289 288 288 d 2 SI PLUS OR(UNH OUSED) 2 PROGR.-�ili AND REL OCATABLE CAPACTrF 748 667 534 494 471 451 41? 412 d as NOTE S: ti M l Evergreen and lllahee diddle Schools currently have cap acitv for M O&.850 students respective1y, so no new cap acitvis >, anticipated with the rebuild of these older buildings. 2 Internet Academy students are include dinprojections but do not require full time use of s cho ol facilitie s.This represents y historic enollment. LL 3 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be usedto VI temp ofarily-hour a students until p ermanent facilitie s are available_Ms is a calculate d number only bas ed on clas s size capacity of 25.The actual number of portables that will be used will be has ed on actual student population needs_ t K W r-� C N E t c� r r Q Packet Pg. 146 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN as 0 CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued o Capacity Summary-High Schools c Actual Budget -- Projected-- d Calendar Year 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 E CAPACITY ISchoolYear 2022-23 2023-24 2024 25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 y BUILDING PROGRAM E Q HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 5,853 6,090 6,090 6,090 6,090 6,090 6,090 6,090 Add/Subtract capacity 237 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 m Thomas Jefferson High School 237 m w m Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 6,090 6,090 6,090 6,090 6,090 6,090 6,090 6,090 :v w ENROLLMENT Basic Headcount Enrollment 6,532 6,473 6,558 6,569 6,559 6,586 6,638 6,698 Q. Internet Academy' (180) (180) (180) (180) (180) (180) (180) (180) V Basic Ed without Internet Acadenry 6,352 6,293 6,378 6,389 6,379 6,406 6,458 6,518 a m SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) >_ PROCRAMCAPACTTY (262) (203) (288) (299) (289) (316) (368) (428) z m L CL RELOCATABLE CAPACITYZ 0 Current Portable Capacity 416 416 416 520 624 728 832 936 V m Add/Subtract portable capacity 0 0 52 52 52 52 52 52 As Needed on High School Campuses 52 52 52 52 52 52 0 a� c 'L Adjusted Portable Capacity 416 416 520 624 728 832 936 1,040 d v SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) 0 PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE d CAPACTTY3 154 213 232 325 439 516 568 612 N ti M NOTES: 0 1 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities.This represents historic enrollment. d 2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to Li temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available.This is a calculated number only based on class size capacity of V� 25.The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. 3 Capacity for unhoused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and no planning time in some classrooms. K w c d E t 0 Q Packet Pg. 147 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS 0 0 Single and Multi-Family Residences a Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to c help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was E established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substantially adopted by the City of Auburn, Federal Way, and Kent. The formula requires the District to E a establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard E construction costs, which are unique to that district. w N d Impact Fee Calculation 0 When applicable, the CFP includes variables for the calculation of the Impact Fee for single family and multi-family units based on King County Code 2 1 A and the Growth Management a Act. c 0 a Plan Year 2023 Plan Year 2024 .y C d Single Family Units $0 $0 Multi-Family Units $0 $6,998 Q- E 0 U Impact Fee Calculation-King County Code 2 1 A c 0 a� c L d V a c� N ti M fC fC L d V x W d E V Q Packet Pg. 148 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS, CON'T U School Site Acquisition Cost: Student Student C rn Facility Cost/ Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Q Acreage Acre Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 0 0.1705 0.7104 $0 $0 cC Middle School 0.0682 0.3665 $0 $0 High School 0.0958 0.3665 $0 $0 TOTAL $0 $0 C d School Construction Cost: Student Student %Penn Fac./ Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Q Total Sq Ft Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR C Elementary 96.61% 0 0.1705 0.7104 $0 $0 Middle School 98.36% 0.0682 0.3665 $0 $0 High School 98.28% $16,017,095 237 0.0958 0.3665 $6,363 $24,344 11J TOTAL $6,363 $24,344 d Temporary Facility Cost: Student Student %Temp Fac. Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ LL Total Sq Ft Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR two Elementary 4.60% 0.1705 0.7104 $0 $0 Q Middle School 2.75% 0.0682 0.3665 $0 $0 V High School 1.21% 0.0958 0.3665 $0 $0 TOTAL $0 $0 a School Construction Assistance Program Credit Calculation: Student Student > Construction Cost Sq.Ft. State Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Allocation/Sq Ft Student Match SFR MFR SFR MFR a1 Elementary 24683.00% 0.1705 0.7104 $0 $0 i Middle School 24683.00% 0.0682 0.3665 $0 $0 C High School 24683.00% $130 1 0.0958 0.3665 $1,963 $7,510 C Total $1,963 $7,510 V d Tax Payment Credit Calculation SFR MFR Z Average Assessed Value' (April2022) $590,378 $236,260 O Capital Bond Interest Rate(February 2022) 3.58% 3.58% Net Present Value of Average Dwelling $4,890,202 $1,956,982 C Years Amortized 10 10 d Property Tax Levy Rate $1.45 $1.45 = Present Value of Revenue Stream $7,091 $2,838 7 Single Family Multi-Family d Residences Residences Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost $ $ Permanent Facility Cost $ 6,363 $ 24,344 Temporary Facility Cost $ - $ State Match Credit $ (1,963) $ (7,510) Tax Payment Credit $ (7,091) $ (2,838) i Sub-Total $ (2,691) $ 13,996 50%Local Share $ (1,345) $ 6,998 LL� V Calculated Lnpact Fee 1 $ - $ 6,998 t 'Each jurisdiction(King County,Cities of Federal Way,Auburn,Kent)through local ordinances may adopt lesser fees. LLI 'Due to the high number of affordable housing projects in Federal Way there is a significant difference between Appraised and Taxable values. We have chosen to use the Appraised value to give a higher credit to future t t� r r Q Packet Pg. 149 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION, CON'T 0 0 SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COST a Consistent with the capacity calculations described earlier, the District uses the OSPI square footage calculation for determining capacity at our secondary schools. Based on this methodology, the following construction costs for Thomas Jefferson High School are E allocated as the proportionate share: Q r c d E Square Footage Capacity at approx. 131 s . ft. w Current: 179,119 1378 Planned: 210,000 1615 Increased Capacity 237 Increase as % 17.24% GMP $92,903,922 Proportionate Share $16,017,095 c 0 The District will use the above formulas created as a base for future Capital Facilities Plans during the life of the current bond authorization. The capacity of these schools may vary from year to year as programs are added or changed and construction cost may increase over time. L CL E FACILITIES CAPACITY 0 Permanent Facility Capacity: Changes to the Building Program Capacities calculation are found on page 16. a Capacity Summaries: ° The changes in the Capacity Summary reflect the changes in the capacities and L student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 24-27. Student Generation Factor Analysis: Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately a for single-family units and multi-family units. The factors used in the 2023 N Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single- M family units and multi-family units that were constructed in the District in the >, last five (5)years and can be found on the next page Temporary Facility Cost: i The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on pages 17 and 18. x w c a� E z 0 Q Packet Pg. 150 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN to O STUDENT GENERATION RATES New Construction 2018-2022 a U- :..........................................................................................................................:.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... r S �family Homes KG 1st 2nd ... 4th 5th ES Total; 6th 7th 81h IM5 Total; 9th 101h [ filth 12th HS Total; Totals Q ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Emerald Greens 16 0 2 2 2 6 1 1 2 1 1 2 14 [........................................................................................................................[...................... Havenwood Park 84 0 4 2 4 1 3 14; 1 1 2' 1 2 1 4; 20; O ................................................................................................................................................................................ ................. ................. :Huntington Woods 73 1 1 2 2 2 2 10 2 3 5, 1 2 4 7. 22 R ..............................,.............................................................,........................................................... ................................................................................:.... ........ ........ (L Jovita Heights 107 5 7 1 6 3 22 2 7 2 11 7 4 1 12: 45 a..................... y Lake Killarney Estates 14 2 1 3 1 1 2 0 S ............................................................:............................................................:..............................'..............................[......................................................................... .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. Moncalieri 20 1 1 2 0[ 2 2 4 ...... to ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... C Pacific Heights 41 1 3 2 3 2 2 13 1 1 3 S. 2 1 3 21. d t Retreat Meadows 56 2 1 2 1 6 1 1 2 1 3 3 7 15 4) Sta water 19 0 0 0 1 1 1 SZ ............................................................:..............................a..............................:..............................a..............................:..........................:. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .......................................................................... ........ Wyncrest II 41 2 1 1 1 1 1 7: 1 2 3 0; 10: O .................................................................................................................................................. ...................... Non-Subdivision 145 6 2 5 1 8 22: 3 3 4 1a..... 6 3 5 7 21 53 ..............................,.............................................................,........................................................... .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. O Total 616 20 21 15 20 7 22 im. 12 17 13 42. 10 20 16 13 59. 2D5. t ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. C 1Nuhi family Units KG 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th ES Total; 6th 7th Bth 1115 Total; 91h loth [ filth 12th HS Total; Total: O ................................................................................................................................................................................ ................. Z31 21-Watermark(s5D)........[.........?21..........'. 33 23 32 24 26 23 ... L}o.... 25 ... .. 28 ... .. 28 ... 810.... 25 20 19... .. ... .. ... .. 17 ... $1.o.... 319 C :..........................:...................... .................. Total 221 33 23 32 20 26 23 157: 25 28 28 81 25 24 19 17 81: 319: L ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................., f3 d lefami i Homes......:..... ES MS................... HS ESSGR MSSGR HSSGR TotaISGR .....'�....................._�...........................o.......... . ......................a.........................;.........................,.........................;.......................... Cl Emerald Greens 16 6 2 2 03750 U.125{1 0.7250 05250 - ..............................,...........................................................................................:..........................:..........................:...................................................... Havenwood Park 84 14 2 4 0.1667 0.023E 0.0476 O.2381 3 :.....................................................................................................................................................................................a.........................a.........................a. ................. ................. :Huntington Woods 73 10 5 7 0.1370 0.0685 0.0959 0.3014 [........................................................................................................................:..........................:..........................:..........................:..........................: Jovita Heights 1f17 22 11 12 020M 0.102E 0.1121 OA206 ....................................................................................................................................................................................a.........................a.........................a.........................;.........................: N Lake Killarney Estates: 14 3 2 0 02143 0.1429 0.0DD0 03571 ..........................................................................................:............................ . M Moncalieri 20 2 0 2 0.1000 0.0DD6 0.1000 0.2000 :.....................................................................................................................................................................................a.........................a.........................a.........................;.........................: Pacific Heights 41 13 5 3 03171 0.1220 0.0732 05122 ...........................................................:..............................,..............................:............................................................:............................................................................................................ f3 Retreat Meadows 56 6 2 7 0.1071 0.0357 0.7254 02679 :.....................................................................................................................................................................................a.........................a.........................a.........................;.........................: Sta water 19 0 0 1 0.0000 0.0DD6 0.0526 OA526 ............................................................[..................................................................................................................................................... .................. L Wyncrest II 41 7 3 0 [ 0.1707 0.0732 0.0D00 0.2439 1v .....................................................................................................................................................................................a.........................a.........................a. ................. ................. Non.Subdivision 145 22 14 21 0.1517 0.0690 0.1448 0.3655 . 4) LL Total 616 105 42 59 0.1705 0.OM2 0.0958 0.3344 ....................................................................................................................................................................................:..........................:.........................:.........................:.........................: U .............................................................:.............................................................:............................................................................................................ r Multifamily Units .ES MS................... HS ESSGR MSSGR HSSGR Tota156R ............................................................,............. . ......................a.........................a.........................,.........................;.......................... 21-Watermark 221 157 81 81 07104 0.3665 0.3665 1A434 t ...................................................................................... .................. .................. .................. .................. Total i 221 ..............157........... 81 81 07104........0-665 0-665 1A434 X ..........................:.........................:.........................:.........................: W C 1v E L v R r Q Packet Pg. 151 6.D.e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2023 to 2024 0 Q Item From/To Comment c c� .r Percent of Permanent Facilities 96.95%to 97.65% Report#3 OSPI E Percent Temporary Facilities 3.05%to 2.41% Updated portable inventory d E Q Average Cost of Portable $128,646 to$231,523 Cost of last portable purchased. Classrooms E m w Construction Cost Allocation $246.83 to $246.83 Change effective July 2022 (2023 not available at time of production) State Match 62.95%to 63.86% Change effective July 2022 0 LL (2023 not available at time of production) .Q 0 Average Assessed Value Per King County Assessor's Office v SFR- $465,326 to$581,023 Single-family residences 0 0 MFR- $171,672 to$198,069 Apartments(2023 data corrected) .y Capital Bond Interest Rate 2.45%to 3.580 o\Updated Market Rate 0. Property Tax Levy Rate $1.85 to$1.45King County Treasury Division E 0 Student Generation Factors Housing Inventory z Z Single-Family Note:Student generation factors for our r_ single family units are based on new 0 Elementary 0.1627 to 0.1705 0) developments constructed within the District c Middle School 0.0278 to 0.0682 over the last five(5)years prior to the date of c`o High School 0.0516 to 0.0958 the fee calculation. _ Muk Family Student generation factors for are multi- Z i Elementary 0.5158 to 0.7104 .family units are based on new developments 0 a constructed within the District over the last Middle School 0.3167 to 0.3665 five(5)years prior to the date ofthe fee N High School 0.2081 to 0.3665 calculation. M Impact Feel 0 SFR- $0 to$0 Single-Family Residential based on the updated calculation MFR- $0 to$6,998 Multi-Family Residential based on the updated calculation 'Each jurisdiction(King County,Cities of Federal Way,Auburn,Kent)through local ordinances may adopt lesser fees. iy I t� t x W r-� C N E t c� r r Q Packet Pg. 152 6.D.f R Q. E m c� 0 N N a HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 401 E CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN E a E 2023-2028 W m U- .Q HIGHLINE U c tv d m c m t a� L Q E 0 P U B L I C S C H O O L S 0 m N ti M N C t U Adopted: July 12, 2023 x w c as E c� a Packet Pg. 153 6.D.f R Q. E m c� 0 N HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 401 E CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN E a 2023-2028 E W m U- .Q m U c tv d m c m BOARD OF DIRECTORS Aaron Garcia, President 0 Joe Van, Vice President Angelica Alvarez 0 Azeb Hegos i m Carrie Howell N ti M N C SUPERINTENDENT Dr. Ivan Duran x w c as E c� a Packet Pg. 154 6.D.f R Q. Table of Contents E as Page O N Introduction......................................................................................................................................I Q c Standard of Service 4 f° c a� Capital Facilities Invento 6 E a� Student Enrollment Trends and Projections ..................................................................................10 Q c a� Capital Facilities Projections for Future Needs .............................................................................I I E m w Financing Plan 13 ............................................................................................................................... SchoolImpact Fees........................................................................................................................15 c LL r .Q M U Appendix A. District Maps A-1 r- M a m Appendix B. Population and Enrollment Data B-1 > c as Appendix C: Student Generation Rates/Data............................................................................... C-1 as L Q E O U a� t r c O of C R N 2 v 3 d O� N ti M N C t U r For information regarding the Highline School District's 2023-2028 Capital Facilities Plan, contact Ellie Daneshnia, Executive Director, Capital Planning and Construction, Highline x School District No. 401, 17810 8th Avenue South, Building A, Burien, Washington 98148. w Telephone: (206) 631-7500 as E c� a Packet Pg. 155 6.D.f a E SECTION ONE: INTRODUCTION as 0 Purpose of the Capital Facilities Plan N a This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan has been prepared by the Highline School District (the "District") as the District's primary facility planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act(the"GMA")and King County Council E Code Title 21A. The Plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2023. The GMA outlines 13 broad goals including adequate provision of necessary public facilities and services. E Schools are among these necessary facilities and services. School districts have adopted capital �. facilities plans to satisfy the requirements of RCW 36.70A.070 and to identify additional school facilities necessary to meet the educational needs of the growing student populations anticipated 2 w in their districts. as The Highline School District(the"District")has prepared this Capital Facilities Plan(the"CFP") to provide King County (the "County") and the cities of Burien, Des Moines, Kent, Normandy Park, SeaTac,and Tukwila with a schedule and financing program for capital improvements over the next six years (2023-2028). v c The District will update this Plan annually and include any necessary changes to the impact fee a schedule. .y C Executive Summary as L Q The District experienced steady enrollment increases between 2010 and 2017. However, 2018 E 0 and 2019 enrollment decreased from the previous years, and the global pandemic resulted in v further declines. Enrollment projections from December 2022 show a continuing decline in enrollment over the next five years and gradual increases just beyond the five-year planning c period. L The District currently serves an approximate student population of 17,341 (October 1, 2022 = enrollment). The District reconfigured grade levels in the fall of 2019 and now serves grades K- •2 5 in 18 elementary schools, grades 6-8 in five middle-level schools, and grades 9-12 in five high a schools. In addition, the District has alternative programs: Big Picture (MS and HS) at the Manhattan site; CHOICE Academy (MS and HS) at the Woodside site; New Start (9-12) at the cm Salmon Creek Site currently but will be moving to Southern Heights as of September 2023; Maritime High School at the Olympic Interim site and Highline Virtual Academy will be moved from Olympic to Southern Heights; and Puget Sound Skills Center("PSSC"). z 'x Over the last 20 years, the District has embarked on a major capital improvement effort to v� enhance its facilities to meet current educational and life-safety standards. Since 2002, the District has passed three major capital bonds: one in 2002 for approximately $189,000,000, one in 2006 for approximately$148,000,000, and one in 2016 for approximately$299,850,000. The w 2002 and 2006 bonds were used for the replacement of existing facilities and not to accommodate increased enrollment. The 2016 bonds facilitated a combination of improvements to/replacement E 0 - 1 - a Packet Pg. 156 6.D.f of existing facilities and the provision of new capacity. E With the approved capital bond funds and reimbursements from the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, the State of Washington, the Port of Seattle, the Federal Aviation o Administration, and private donations for a new Raisbeck Aviation High School,the District has a designed, permitted, and constructed 14 new elementary schools, 1 new middle school, 2 new high schools,renovated 3 schools as interim facilities, and renovated portions of Memorial Field and Camp Waskowitz. All this work has been done since March 2002. E The District's 2016 bond proposal was based on the recommendations of a Capital Facilities Advisory Committee("CFAC"), a citizens' committee representing every part of the District. The E a committee met for a year to study the District's facilities needs, review data, such as enrollment projections and building conditions, and analyze various solutions. CFAC developed a long-term facilities plan, which includes the 2016 bond as the first phase of a four-phase plan to meet w students' needs over the next 20 years. The 2016 bond projects included new capacity at the elementary and middle school levels to accommodate enrollment needs and the implementation of recent legislation. Specifically, the District constructed a new Des Moines Elementary to replace the existing school and increase its c° a student capacity, added classrooms at existing elementary schools, built the new Glacier Middle v School, and constructed a new Highline High School to replace the existing school and increase its student capacity. The District does not anticipate the need at this time for additional land to a accommodate the new schools; however, the land will be necessary in the future to support the District's long-range facilities plan and the Educational Strategic Plan. c as as CFAC provided recommendations in the Spring of 2019 regarding the second phase plan for a E bond proposal. Those recommendations included rebuilding (with added capacity) Evergreen C High School, Tyee High School, and Pacific Middle School, as well as several non-capacity replacements and critical need projects. The design of Tyee and Evergreen High Schools and Pacific Middle School, through 50% schematic design, was included in the 2016 Bond. o a, c In June 2022, the District Board of Directors adopted a resolution to send the bond proposals to the voters for consideration in the amount of$518,397,000. The voters approved the proposal in = November 2022 with an overwhelming 68.84 percent. IL The 2022 bond projects include the construction of new schools to replace existing buildings at Evergreen High School, Tyee High School, and Pacific Middle School. The 2022 bond projects ti all include District-wide critical capital improvements, including but not limited to (1) making emergency repairs; (2) constructing a new building to replace Transportation Building L; (3) c providing sites, facilities and spaces for virtual programs; (4) providing capital contributions for Maritime High School; (5) making roof restoration and remedial repairs; (6) acquiring and 'xi installing Sylvester Middle School Synthetic Field; (7) making exterior and interior finish c� improvements; and (8) making other health, safety, security, and capital improvements, all as determined necessary and advisable by the Board. x w As part of the 2022 bond to construct new schools, Tyee High School students will attend school at the Olympic Interim Site in Des Moines for two years starting in September 2023. Maritime E - 2 - Packet Pg. 157 6.D.f High School will continue at the Olympic Interim Site and share the space with Tyee High School E starting in September 2023. Highline Virtual Academy (HVA) will relocate from the Olympic Interim Site to space in the o former Southern Heights Elementary building, starting September 2023, and the Highline Virtual a Elementary(HVE) school,also currently at Olympic Interim,will relocate to Seahurst Elementary starting September 2023. The HVE move is due to low enrollment and decreasing demand for elementary online options. HVE was designed to serve 150 students. With enrollment far lower a than projected,HVE is not fiscally sustainable as a stand-alone school(and,due to state limitations E on out of district enrollment in the program, recruiting out-of-district students is not a viable a option). HVE teachers will continue to teach remote classes. Seahurst Elementary School will E a retain its in-person classrooms serving all neighborhood students. a) E New Start High School will relocate to the former Southern Heights Elementary building starting w September 2023. This move will provide improved accommodation for New Start students and staff. Southern Heights Elementary School closed at the end of the 2021-22 school year due to shrinking enrollment. Southern Heights is in the best condition of the surplus district sites available for c° a school relocation. The district is making improvements at that site this summer to accommodate the need of New Start High School and Highline Virtual Academy. a This CFP identifies the current enrollment,the current capacity of each educational facility as well as programmed improvements, and the projected enrollment over the six-year planning period. C This CFP does not recommend a schedule of impact fees for new development. However, the District intends to closely monitor enrollment patterns and future updates to this CFP may include a an impact fee recommendation where supported by projected enrollment increases and related 0 capacity needs. 0 aM C L d V a o� N ti M C t 2 I t� r z K W r-� C 4) E t c� - 3 - a Packet Pg. 158 6.D.f a E SECTION 2—STANDARD OF SER VICE 0 a King County Code 21A.06 refers to a"Standard of Service"that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. School facility and student capacity needs are dictated by ° the types and amounts of space required to accommodate the District's adopted educational program. The educational program standards which typically drive facility space needs include grade configuration, optimum facility size, class size, educational program offerings, classroom E utilization and scheduling requirements, and use of relocatable classrooms (portables). a c District educational program standards may change in the future as a result of changes in the E education program, special programs class sizes, grade span configurations, and use of new w technology, as well as other physical aspects of the school facilities. In addition, the District implemented reduced K-3 class sizes in the fall of 2019, which impacted school capacity and educational program standards. (The District implemented full-day kindergarten previously.) The school capacity inventory will be reviewed periodically and adjusted for any changes to the - educational program standards. These changes will also be reflected in future updates of this CFP. a 0 c� The Standard of Service outlined below reflects only those programs and educational opportunities provided to students that directly affect the capacity of school buildings. The special programs a listed below require classroom space,thus the permanent capacity of some buildings housing these programs has been reduced. a� L Table I 0- Class Size—Standard of Service 0 as c Grade Level Average Class Size Based on 0 Standard of Service c Kindergarten 17 Grades 1 —3 17 = Grades 4—5 27 Grades 6—8 29 a Grades 9— 12 29 o� N ti M It is not possible to achieve 100%utilization of all regular teaching stations throughout the day. Therefore, classroom capacity is adjusted using a utilization factor of available z teaching stations depending on the physical characteristics of the facility and educational x program needs. v� r z x w c m E 0 -4 - a Packet Pg. 159 6.D.f Q. E Elementary School Standard of Service Models as • Special education for students with disabilities may be provided in self- N contained classrooms. a • All students are provided music instruction in a separate classroom. • Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms designated as follows: • Resource Rooms c • English Language Learners(ELL) • Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) a • Gifted Education a • Learning Assisted Programs w • Severely Behavior Disorder • Transition Rooms • Mild, Moderate, and Severe Disabilities • Developmental Kindergarten w • Extended Daycare Programs and Preschool Programs a c� c a Secondary School Standard of Service Models .y C N • Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms designated as follows: • Resource Rooms o • English Language Learners(ELL) • Science Labs • Career and Vocational Rooms ° • Daycare Programs L • Alternative Program Spaces = a o� N ti M C t 2 I t� r z K W r-� C E t 0 - 5 - a Packet Pg. 160 6.D.f a E SECTION THREE: CAPITAL FACILITIES INVENTORY 0 Q This section provides an inventory of capital facilities owned and operated by the District including schools and relocatable classrooms (modular or portables). School facility capacity was ° inventoried based on the space required to accommodate the District's adopted educational program standards.See Section Two: Standard of Service.A map showing the locations of District facilities is provided in Appendix A. Q Schools c as E See Section One for a description of the District's schools and programs. w N School capacity was determined based on the number of teaching stations (or general classrooms) within each building and the space requirements of the District's adopted current educational program and internal targets as reported to the Information and Condition of Schools (ICOS) system with the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction. It is this capacity calculation a that is used to establish the District's baseline capacity and to determine future capacity needs v based on projected student enrollment. The school capacity inventory is summarized in Tables 2, 3, and 4. a as .y C N Relocatable Classrooms (Portables) L Q Relocatable classrooms (portables) are used as interim classroom space to house students until 0 funding can be secured to construct permanent classrooms. The District currently uses 57 a, relocatable classrooms at various school sites throughout the District to provide additional interim c general classroom capacity. A typical relocatable classroom can provide capacity for a full-size 0 class of students. Current use of relocatable classrooms throughout the District is summarized in L Table 5. 0 as x 0 IL o� N ti M C t 2 I t� r z K W r-� C E t c� r� Q -6- Packet Pg. 161 6.D.f a Table 2 E Elementary School Level Inventory a 0 Building Area Teaching Permanent a Elementary School (sq.ft.) Stations* Capacity** c� Beverly Park at Glendale ES 58,145 22 447 E Bow Lake ES 74,729 23 467 0 Cedarhurst ES 67,188 25 508 E Des Moines ES 84,568 38 771 a Gregory Heights ES 65,978 22 447 Hazel Valley ES 65,294 23 467 2 Hilltop ES 56,862 24 487 w Madrona ES 69,240 25 508 m Marvista ES 66,421 25 508 McMicken Heights ES 68,378 22 447 U_ Midway ES 66,096 22 447 a Mount View ES 67,783 26 528 ti North Hill ES 70,085 27 548 Parkside ES 66,990 22 447 a m Seahurst ES 59,967 20 548 y Shorewood ES 60,326 22 447 White Center ES*** 70,854 28 609 a TOTAL 1,138,904 416 8,628 0 *Teaching Station definition:A space designated as a classroom.Other stations include spaces designated for special education and pull-out programs. c **Regular classrooms. aM c •L d V a CD N ti M C t 2M 2 I t� r z K W r-� C E t c� r� Q —7— Packet Pg. 162 6.D.f 0. Table 3 E Middle School Level Inventory*** Middle School Building Area Teaching Stations* Permanent 0 (sq.ft.) Capacity** a c Cascade MS 87,957 33 957 c Chinook MS 101,433 27 783 Glacier MS 142,104 37 1073 c Pacific MS 70,441 24 696 E E Sylvester MS 89,117 28 812 Q Big Picture MS (at Manhattan) 2 58 Choice (at Woodside) 2 58 w TOTAL 491,052 153 4,437 *Teaching Station Definition:A space designated as a general classroom. Other stations include spaces designated for special education and pull-out programs. w **Regular classrooms. coo ***Does not include alternative programs: CHOICE MS capacity at Woodside site. a V c Table 4 a High School Level Inventory*** .y C N Building Area Teaching Permanent High School (sq.ft.) Stations* Capacity** 0 Raisbeck Aviation HS 87,934 14 406 0 Big Picture HS (at Manhattan) 29,141 10 290 W c Evergreen HS 161,456 48 1392 0 a� Highline HS 291,009 53 1537 S Mount Rainier HS 207,159 55 1595 0 d x Tyee HS 129,017 38 1102 2 TOTALS 905,716 218 6,322 a *Teaching Station definition:A space designated as a general classroom. Other stations include spaces N designated for special education and pull-out programs. M **Regular classrooms. ***Does not include alternative programs: CHOICE HS capacity at Woodside site;New Start HS at Salmon Creek site;Puget Sound Skills Center;Maritime High School and a� Highline Virtual Academy,which are located at the Olympic Interim site currently. I t� r z K w r-� C E t c� r� Q -8- Packet Pg. 163 6.D.f a E Table 5 Relocatable Classrooms (Portable)Inventory o 0 Elementary School Relocatable** Other*** Interim Capacity a Beverly Park at Glendale 0 2 0 Bow Lake 3 1 61 Cedarhurst 4 0 81 E Des Moines 0 0 0 Gregory Heights 0 2 0 E Hazel Valley 3 1 61 Q Hilltop 5 1 102 Madrona 2 0 41 m Marvista 2 0 41 w N 2 McMicken Heights 0 0 0 Midway 4 0 81 0 Mount View 4 0 81 a_ North Hill 0 0 0 a Parkside 0 0 0 ti Seahurst 2 2 41 Shorewood 2 2 41 a m Southern Heights 2 1 41 y White Center 4 0 81 TOTAL 37 12 751.1 E Middle School Relocatable** Other *** Interim Capacity 0 Cascade 3 0 87 4) Z Chinook 5 1 145 r_ 0 Glacier 0 0 0 a) c Pacific 4 0 116 d Sylvester 4 0 116 = Big Picture MS 4 7 116 •2 TOTAL 20 8 580 a o� High School Relocatable** Other*** Interim Capacity cm M Raisbeck Aviation HS 0 0 0 m Big Picture HS 0 0 0 Evergreen HS 0 4 0 a� Highline HS 0 0 0 =i Mount Rainier HS 0 0 0 v r Tyee HS 0 2 0 z TOTALS 0 6 0 w c **Used for regular classroom capacity. ***The relocatable referenced under"other relocatable"are used for special pull-out programs,storage, community use,etc. ° Q -9- Packet Pg. 164 6.D.f a E SECTION FOUR: STUDENT ENROLLMENT TRENDS AND PROJECTIONS 0 Generally, enrollment projections using historical calculations are most accurate for the initial a years of the forecast period. Moving further into the future, more assumptions about economic conditions, land use, and demographic trends in the area affect the projection. Monitoring birth rates in the County and population growth for the area are essential yearly activities in the ongoing management of the CFP. In the event that enrollment growth slows,plans for new facilities can be E delayed. It is much more difficult, however, to initiate new projects or expedite projects in the event enrollment growth exceeds the projections. E c In October 2020, the District's enrollment was 17,745 (headcount). By October 2021, headcount enrollment declined by 269 students to 17,476 and declined further in October 2022 to 17,341. as This decline reflects the trend in other King County school districts and also, with regard to the y District, includes lower kindergarten enrollment than expected as some parents decided to wait through the pandemic prior to enrolling students in school. Like other school districts, the global pandemic impacted enrollment. New housing growth also slowed in the District after the U_ completion of several major projects. Some, but not all, of the enrollment decline was previously ° projected. v c With the assistance of a professional demographer,the District has developed its own methodology a for forecasting future enrollments. This methodology, a modified cohort survival method, considers a variety of factors to evaluate the potential student population growth for the years 2023 through 2032. These factors include projected births,projected growth in the K-12 population,and a model that considers growth in population and housing within the District's boundaries. The a methodology also considers the impacts on enrollment related to charter school enrollment within c the District's boundaries with certain assumptions related to recent trends. Therefore, the v methodology and the resulting projections are considered conservative. c 0 District enrollment increased by 5.2% between 2010 and 2016, with enrollment declining thereafter through the current year. December 2022 projections show a continuing K-12 decline over the five-year planning period with increases occurring thereafter. Using the modified cohort = survival projections, the District expects a total enrollment of 17,054 students in 2028 and a total enrollment of 17,461 by 2032. See Appendix B. The District will closely monitor enrollment and a make adjustments as necessary. Future updates to this CFP will identify any adjustments or changes. cm M Table 6 Projected Student Enrollment z 2022-2028 c.� i r Actual Percent Projection 2022* 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Change Change w 17,341 17,223 17,139 16926 16,835 16,904 17,054 (287) -1.66% }; c *Actual October 2022 enrollment. E t C� Q -10- Packet Pg. 165 6.D.f a E SECTION FIVE: CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECTIONS FOR FUTURE NEEDS .! 0 Projected future capacity needs, shown in Table 7, are derived by applying the projected number a of students to the projected permanent capacity. It is not the District's policy to include relocatable classrooms when determining future capital facility needs;therefore,the interim capacity provided ° by relocatable classrooms is not included in this analysis. The District will utilize relocatable classrooms as necessary to address interim capacity needs. Information on relocatable classrooms by grade level and interim capacity can be found in Table 5. Information on planned construction projects can be found in the Financing Plan, Table 8. Q c as E a� w N a+ LL V C a m .y C N t L Q E 0 V 0 L d V a o� N ti M C t 2 I t� r z K W r-� C E M 0 r� Q -11- Packet Pg. 166 6.D.f a Table 7 E Projected Student Capacity-2023 through 2028 0 LEMENTARY SCHOOL Actual Oct. 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Q ACILITIES 2022 ennanent Capacity 8,628 8,628 8,628 8,628 9,628 8,628 8,628 C .apacity Additions E otal Pennauent Capacity 8,628 9,628 8,628 8,628 9,628 8,628 8,628 injected Enrollment 7,759 7,664 7,539 7,496 7,632 7,690 7,726 Q C d E d ennanent Capacity W 169 964 1089 1132 996 938 902 w mplus/(Deficit) LL IDDLE SCHOOL Actual Oct. V ACILITIES 2022 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 ennanent Capacity 4,437 4.43' 4.43' 4,437 4.43- 4.43' 4,691 d apacity Additions '54 us c d otal Permanent Capacity 4,437 4.437 4.4 - 4.437 4.4 - 4,691 4.6)1 L Q rojectedEmollment 3,688 3.�3_ _.(�_�� 3,610 3.6�1 3,639 3.665 C V t ennanent Capacity }' - o 1026 0�, 9D4 501 O Swplus/(Deficit) c Pacific Middle School will be replaced with added capacity for a total capacity of 950 d 2 v GH SCHOOL Actual Oct. 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 21124-26 2026-27 2027-28 ACILITIES 2021 FTE a ennanent Capacity 6,322 6,322 6. '� 6,322 6,420 6,420 6,420 o� cm apacity Additions 98 M otal Pennauent Capacity 6,3" 6,322 6,322 6,420 6,420 6,420 6,420 z fojected Enrollment 5,894 6,026 5,965 5,821 5,562 5,575 5,663 2 I t� r ennanent Capacity 4'c 39r� 357 5111 859 45 z Sin-plus/(Deficit) W Tyee High School will be replaced with added capacity for a total capacity of 1,200 E t c� Q -12- Packet Pg. 167 6.D.f SECTION SIX: FINANCING PLAN Q. E Planned Improvements The Finance Plan includes the 2022 Bond projects, with some preplanning costs funded by the 2016 Bond. a c Under the 2016 bond, the District: (1) added the new Des Moines Elementary School, (2) c constructed new elementary school classrooms at various sites, and (3) constructed a the New Glacier Middle School on land owned by the District. These projects accommodated recent growth within the District. The 2016 Bond also funded "non-capacity" capital needs at existing schools including the replacement of Highline High School and safety/security improvements at various a schools. as E a� The 2022 Bond funds the replacement of both Evergreen and Tyee High Schools, as well as the w replacement of Pacific Middle School. The bond also includes District-wide critical capital needs improvements including, but not limited to (1) making emergency repairs; (2) constructing a new building to replace Transportation Building L; (3)providing sites, facilities, and spaces for virtual Ui programs; (4) providing capital contributions for Maritime High School; (5) making roof restoration and remedial repairs; (6) acquiring and installing Sylvester Middle School Synthetic Field; (7) making exterior and interior finish improvements; and (8) making other health, safety, v security, and capital improvements, all as determined necessary and advisable by the Board. a m Financing for Planned Improvements y c as Funding for planned improvements is typically secured from several sources including voter- 0- CL approved bonds, State match funds, and impact fees. E 0 0 General Obligation Bonds: Bonds are typically used to fund the construction of new schools and other capital improvement projects and require a 60%voter approval. The District's voters in November 2022 approved by 68.84% a $518 million school construction bond, which °a, included funding for completion planning and construction of the Pacific Middle School, L Evergreen High School, and Tyee High School projects. The 2022 Bond also includes funding for District-wide critical capital improvements determined necessary and advisable by the Board. c, State School Construction Assistance Program Funds: State School Construction a Assistance funds come from the Common School Construction Fund. The State deposits revenue N from the sale of renewable resources from State school lands set aside by the Enabling Act of 1889 M into the Common School Account. If these sources are insufficient to meet needs, the Legislature can appropriate General Obligation Bond funds, or the Superintendent of Public Instruction can prioritize projects for funding. School districts may qualify for State School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) funds for specific capital projects based on a prioritization system. VI The District anticipates receiving$32 million in SCAP funding for the Evergreen High School and r Tyee High School projects. x w Impact Fees: Impact fees are a means of supplementing traditional funding sources for the construction of public facilities needed to accommodate new development. See Section 7 School E Impact Fees. a -13- Packet Pg. 168 6.D.f Other Funding: The District received funding toward school construction from the Port E of Seattle/Federal Aviation Administration for Highline High School and Des Moines Elementary School replacement projects and will receive funding for the Pacific Middle School replacement o project. o Q The Six-Year Financing Plan shown in Table 8 demonstrates how the District intends to fund new 3 construction capacity and improvements to school facilities for the years 2023-2028. The financing components include current and future planned bond funding, SCAP funds, and Port/FAA funds. E c as Table 8 E Q Capital Facilities Financing Plan (Costs in Millions) m w N O a+ Bonds/ Ior3l pact state Im C� Project 2822 2U23 2U24 205 21}'26 21}'27 2028 PnrUFAAA ea Cos Local t Funds Fees LL Funds i0 Various Sites r� Building L Replacement 0.1 0.5 2.4 3 V Virtual-kcadems- New 2.5 0.5 3 Start Sylvester Field 1.9 1.9 d O Critical Needs Bond 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 21 2016&Bond 2022 y C Middle Schools t O Pacific Middle School 3.5 5.7 8.2 76.6 46 1.2 141.2 L tZ High Schools E O Evergreen High School 29.1 100 79.1 5 0.3 213.5 x X V O Tyee High School 21.8 99.2 66.4 2.3 189.7 x X C O Z31 C L d V IL o� N ti M O C t 2 I t� r z X W r-� C O E t c� r� Q -14- Packet Pg. 169 6.D.f SECTION SEVEN: SCHOOL IMPACT FEES Q. E as The GMA authorizes jurisdictions to collect impact fees to supplement funding of additional public facilities needed to accommodate new development. Impact fees cannot be used for the operation, N maintenance, repair, alteration, or replacement of existing capital facilities used to meet existing Q service demands. c c To be eligible to collect school impact fees for new capacity projects, a district must demonstrate expected grade level enrollment growth over the six-year planning period and a related need for new capacity. As discussed in Section 4 above, after several years of increasing enrollment the District's recent enrollment has declined and current enrollment projections show no additional Q need for growth related projects over the six-year planning period. The District plans to monitor actual enrollment in future years and will include updated information in future updates to this E CFP. w N a+ When the District is eligible for impact fees to fund growth-related capacity needs, impact fees are calculated utilizing the formula in the King County Code. The resulting figures are based on the Ui District's cost per dwelling unit to purchase land for school sites, make site improvements, construct schools, and purchase/install relocatable classrooms (portables). As required under the GMA, credits are applied in the formula to account for State Match Funds to be reimbursed to the v District and projected future property taxes to be paid by the dwelling unit. a m When impact fees are calculated,the District's cost per dwelling unit is derived by multiplying the y cost per student by the applicable student generation rate per dwelling unit. The student generation rate is the average number of students generated by each housing type; in this case, single family CL dwellings and multi-family dwellings.Where applicable,the District uses a student generation rate E data based on actual permit data from local jurisdictions. See Appendix C. v a� When fees are calculated, the District applies a 50% discount rate required by the King County c School Impact Fee Ordinance to the fee calculated using the variables and formula described °a, above. L as King County and the City of Kent currently have adopted school impact fee ordinances and collect cz, school impact fees on behalf of the District when requested. The District has asked the other cities that it serves to consider adoption of a school impact fee ordinance. These requests are necessary a as the District anticipates once again establishing eligibility to request school impact fees in the N future. M m c z Table 9 School Impact Fees VI 2023 r z x Housing Type Impact Fee Per Dwelling Unit W Single Family N/A Multi-Family N/A t Q -15- Packet Pg. 170 6.D.f R Q. E m c� O N N a E E a E w as m u_ r .Q m U APPENDIX A a DISTRICT ATTENDANCE c BOUNDARY MAPS Q. E O U a� t r c O of C R N 2 v 3 d C4 N ti M N C t U r t x w c as E c� A-1 Q Packet Pg. 171 6.D.f ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ATTENDANCE BOUNDARIES (2023) s'x 631'..'SI WE41LY841.F�&f% � Y ¢l' KLItkTe •O q- ran[Pr. - .r. Gorden fn 3 ■I,�t Ee i�rg� ��' IqA[N1ER REACH 1 Er M. s :.VIEa 5holey+aad ol++mNnr,ry" f I � J '-Y�: q N Ekn e•.lalti' 1. 5o11frtArf ' k�"� ._F'kghC3 y Br C M1RnAffe Park :cl¢mEf«tta N�ITIi SE [n•. 'r� r°� � '8hu :j: a"r PI [fit Bell Fii�lds � '.lilyh�rnc +� tA�yy�r�q'tarllcal SariE Tukwila N 4ero ¢ISnKn[nry a U LL 147 x sx'1EOIrisr. '0 R .r E:errtrRary � Se ttle•Tao I.._�.en d Internatiarr E. i :. -!m � d Airport , >,[1�YNCE.rr*Fu_ _ C su ra �� m I- rf.,.t,..:,. - �nf{ Park riia 1CTerialY f ' - U ' f s:ovrl.I Fl�ri i'r l.yYl S, , C. O I `L �,;I' rF7.rbon� pT I.L T �Ir Tr 1•.'r�f N IOQ14r 'rl bm Pj Pon, - el LLI Parkvde � r VI C N t V fC A-2 Q Packet Pg. 172 6.D.f R a MIDDLE SCHOOL ATTENDANCE BOUNDARIES (2023) O yn,usn ss Ktitio[a N Garden N a RAINIER 9EACH .a ce, Jdhi7e;:cntcr .F 4"dL .n'- t CHI.NE DiVERTON-BOULEV'A C PACK M1 Br d M aWr- ;t m `IGdrierLu Md�k N -_ .ors. ._ SCflflO• - Tukwire LL Q m } Q Ahv0 � d .' Sest le-TIC a -m Inlig M18ti071 . Artporl HUTHCFNrERY •N 5pp MaS09r 41t1dY6 S'.7: d SCAraor b ;�r�noA4 � Q- rdprm8l7dy h' µ� Qark SdtaW i O k ! .�Ir i•r — t IknSl�' J 1�•.ili' L.,kc Park' O 2 d Se' 7v181frPS � N SCI►stR J4Sj PBrk + � Pac�7 r. ${riypl h aUry Island Fki:r rlinrd V -Ml.ne PArk K Lu N t V fC A-3 a Packet Pg. 173 HIGH SCHOOL ATTENDANCE BOUNDARIES (2023) as "4A zt Gwd— RMWERBEACH WHM-Center sa.;xaL ligh Schobi .93ULEVA ril Creuk Park $w,'wiar morthiS.0.2c Raik,R auJlhedds a) Se3hur,i Pgrk Pla4gin nd Iiip 1�ne Seal a Lu Do ,71 Garde -u:K M94- Tukwos HUN sukov LL Borim ——hs- (L Intn Airportmal'bun 913U'rHCENTFR 11 CL E 0 0 WO JIL A (L Dog Park C%4 Rath- wury 1W&Rd A. III R14Sifflll�ll 15FFI,E of Vi- x Lu as A-4 Packet Pg. 174 6.D.f Q. E Name of School Address Year built d .r Beverly Park at Glendale ES 1201 S 104th St,Seattle,WA 98168 1963 Bow Lake ES 18237 42nd Ave S,Seattle,WA 98188 2007 G rn Cedarhurst ES 11 S 132nd St,Burien,WA 98168 2008 rn Q Des Moines ES 23801 16th Ave S,Des Moines,WA 2020 98198 ca Gregory Heights ES 16201 16th Ave SW,Burien,WA 98166 2004 Hazel Valley ES 402 SW 132nd St,Burien,WA 98146 2004 E Hilltop ES 12250 24th Ave S,Seattle,WA 98168 1957 o � 0 Madrona ES 20301 32nd Ave S,SeaTac,WA 98198 2004 V L Marvista ES 19800 Marine View Dr SW,Normandy 2009 Q Park,WA 98166 v McMicken Heights ES 3708 S 168th St,SeaTac,WA 98188 2011 E 22447 24th Ave S,Des Moines,WA y w Midway ES 98198 2008 W Mount View ES 10811 12th Ave SW,Seattle,WA 98146 2005 y North Hill ES 19835 8th Ave S,Des Moines,WA 98148 2005 Parkside ES 2104 S 247th St,Des Moines,WA 98198 2010 v ca Seahurst ES 14603 14th Ave SW,Burien,WA 98166 1992 W i0 Shorewood ES 2725 SW 116th St,Burien,WA 98146 2008 Southern Heights ES^ 11249 14th Ave S,Seattle,WA 98168 1955 V White Center ES 10015 6th Ave SW,Seattle,WA 98146 2004 Cascade MS 11212 loth Ave SW,Seattle,WA 98146 1957 a o Chinook MS 18650 42nd Ave S,Seatac,WA 98188 1956 s Glacier MS 2450 S 142nd St,Seatac,WA 98168 2020 y a, Pacific MS 22705 24th Ave S,Des Moines,WA 1959 98198 Sylvester MS 16222 Sylvester Rd SW,Burien,WA 1953 Q- 98166 E Big Picture MS 440 S 186th St,Burien,WA 98148 1960 C V Raisbeck Aviation HS 9229 E Marginal Way S,Tukwila,WA 2012 98108 Big Picture HS 440 S 186th St,Burien,WA 98148 1960 o G r Evergreen HS 830 SW 116th St,Seattle,WA 98146 1955 a1 Ln s Highline HS 225 S 152nd St,Burien,WA 98148 2021 i ao c0 'E Mount Rainier HS 22450 19th Ave S,Des Moines,WA 2007 2 Tyee HS 4424 S 188th St,Seatac,WA 98188 1962 tt New Star/Salmon Creek 614 SW 120th St,Burien,WA 98146 1955 7 Olympic Interim site 615 South 200th Street,Des Moines 1954/2019 IL ai cn Puget Sound High School 18010 8th Ave S,Burien,WA 98148 1972/2019 O) s cm mE Valley View Early Learning 17622 46th Ave S,Seatac,WA 98188 1968 O Choice Academy 18367 8th Ave S,Des Moines,WA 98148 1958 CI 4) C z i� 2 I t� r z K W r-� C E t c� A-5 a Packet Pg. 175 6.D.f R Q. E m c� O N N a E E a E w as m u- r .Q m U c APPENDIX B 1° a as POPULATION AND ENROLLMENT DATA N c as as L Q E O U a� t r c O of C R N 2 v 3 d C4 N ti M N C t U r t x w c as E c� B-1 a Packet Pg. 176 6.D.f a� r Highline Enrollment Projection Preferred Forecast LL Actual Births Proixled Births Births 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 a 16ngCounl 25,190 25,057 24,514 24,630 25032 24,910 25,348 25,487 26,011 25,273 24,337 24,090 23,686 23,428 23,563 23,973 24428 24632 24899 25178 ci KEnrdlas% 6.72% 6,46% 6,34% 6,16% 5,96% 5.85% 5,44% 4.88%a 4,89% 5,03% 5.09% 5,17% 5,32% 5,37% 5,37% 5.40% 5,40% 5,40% 5,40% 5,40% M a Oct13 Oct14 Oct15 0016 Oct17 0018 009 Oc120 Oct21 NO 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 K 1694 1618 1553 1516 1492 1456 1378 1244 1271 1271 K 1240 1245 1260 1259 1267 1294 1318 1329 1344 1359 C 1 1564 1723 1643 1515 1518 1447 1478 1380 1250 1319 1 1288 1256 1237 1283 1288 1296 1317 1342 1354 1368 a L 2 1491 1594 1683 1622 1506 1449 1429 1435 1309 1239 2 1304 1280 1248 1253 1300 1292 1301 1322 1347 1359 E 3 1429 1498 1580 1676 1583 1455 1419 1364 1405 1294 3 1232 1303 1278 1271 1276 1312 1303 1312 1334 1359 0 4 1385 1436 1490 1540 1630 1548 1389 1393 1331 1375 4 1275 1220 1291 1291 1284 1277 1312 1304 1312 1334 0 5 1319 1391 1369 1439 1464 1525 1501 1319 1288 1261 5 1325 1235 1181 1274 1275 1255 1248 1283 1275 1283 r c 6 1420 1307 1262 1363 1390 1384 1409 1406 1205 1190 6 1184 1282 1195 1166 1257 1246 1227 1220 1254 1246 0 7 1241 1369 1271 1234 1289 1270 1331 1405 1359 1179 7 1185 1151 1247 1185 1155 1234 1223 1204 1198 1231 L 8 1319 1270 1377 1284 1253 1247 1285 1301 1367 1319 8 1165 1203 1168 1291 1227 1185 1266 1254 1235 1228 9 1665 1643 1604 1457 1337 1332 1384 1368 1438 1551 9 1467 1278 1320 1307 1444 1359 1312 1402 1389 1368 M 10 1456 1510 1510 1420 1445 1318 1309 1394 1361 1474 10 1581 1449 1262 1329 1316 1439 1355 1309 1398 1385 Z 11 1408 1446 1356 1527 1375 1412 1361 1307 1408 1368 11 1496 1612 1478 1313 1382 1355 1482 1396 1348 1440 a 12 1506 1517 1360 1594 1501 1430 1516 1429 1484 15011 12 1483 1626 1761 1614 1434 1509 1510 1651 1555 1501 Total 18,89719,32219,05819.18716,78318,27318,113917,74517,47617,341 Tota117,22317,13916,92616.83516,90417,05417,17617,32917,34217,461 M a� c t a� Charge 413 425 -264 129 -404 -510 -84 444 -a -135 -118 -84 -213 -91 69 150 122 153 13 120 _ I Charge 2.2% 22% -1.41A 0,7% -ZJ% •27% -0.5% -2,4% •1,5% •0,8% •0.na •0,5% -1.2% •0,5% 0.4% 09% 0.7% C.9% 0.1% 0.7% L) Totals by Level t K-5 8,882 9,260 9,318 90 9,193 BAD 8,694 8,135 TW 7,759 7,654 7,539 7,496 7,632 7,690 7,725 7,801 7,893 7,965 8,062 L j 6-8 3,9B0 3,946 3,910 3,881 3,932 3,901 4,025 4,112 3,931 3,668 3,533 3,636 3,610 3,641 3,639 3,665 3,716 3,679 3,%5 3,705 c a) P2 61035 6,116 5,830 5,998 51658 5,492 5,570 5,498 5,691 5,894 61026 5,965 5,821 5,562 5,575 5,663 5,659 5,758 5,690 5,695 E r r a Packet Pg. 177 6.D.f Preferred Forecast N Highline Comparison of FTE and Headcount Enrollment from October October October Numbers FTE as a Percent FTE Forecast " HeadCount FTE of Headcount AAvv Grade Oct20 OcQI NO 00 Oct21 NO OcQO NMI Oc122 % 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 K 1244 1271 1271 1244.0 1270.2 1270.4 100.0% 99.9% 100.0% 100.0% 1239.5 1244.7 1259.8 1257.9 1266.2 1293.3 1317.8 1328.8 1343.2 1358.3 a ° 1 1380 1250 1319 1380.0 1250.0 1315.0 100.0% 100.0% 99.7% 99.9% 1287.8 1254.6 1235.6 1282.0 1286.4 1294.9 1316.1 1341.0 1352.3 1366.9 2 1435 1309 1239 1435.0 1309.0 1251.5 100.0% 100.0% 101.0% 100.3% 1304.5 1284.2 1252.4 1257,6 1304.8 1296.6 1305.2 1326.6 1351.8 1363.1 3 1364 1405 1294 1363.1 1404.1 1286.4 99.9% 99.9% 99A 99.8% 1231.5 1299.9 1275.3 1268J 1273.4 1308.5 1300.3 1308.9 1330.4 1355.6 4 1393 1331 1375 1393.0 1330.1 1376.1 100.0% 99.9% 100.1% 100.0% 1275.5 1219.9 1290.7 12K2 1283.9 1276.8 1312.0 1303.8 1312.5 1334.0 c0� 5 1319 1288 1261 1317.1 1287.1 1259.2 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% 1324.8 1233.5 1179.7 1272.6 1273.1 1253.7 1246.8 1281.2 1273.2 1281.6 r 6 1406 1205 1190 1406.0 1203.2 1185.2 100.0% 99.9% 99.6% 99.8% 1181.5 1279.9 1193.1 1163.4 1255.1 1243.5 1224.6 1217.8 1251.4 1243.6 0 7 1405 1359 1179 1404.3 1358.3 1177.7 100.0% 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% 1185.1 1149.8 1245.7 1183.9 1154.5 1233.5 1222.1 1203.5 1196.9 1229.9 ° 8 1301 1367 1319 1299.8 1365.5 1303.6 99.9% 99.9% 98,8% 99.5% 1162.3 1197.4 1163.1 1284.7 1221.1 1179.3 1260.0 1248.3 1229.4 1222.6 9 1368 1438 1551 1368.0 1437.0 1547.1 100.0% 99.9% 99.7% 99.8% 1469.2 1276.2 1317.5 1304.8 1441.3 1356.7 1310.3 1399.9 1387.0 1365.9 3 a 10 1394 1361 1474 1393.9 1356.6 1462.3 100A%o 99.7% 99.2% 99.4% 1580.0 1440,9 1255.1 1321.2 1308.5 1431.5 1347.5 1301.3 1390.4 1377.5 N 11 1307 1408 1368 1223.2 1270.8 1217.1 916% 90.3% 89.0% 89.6% 1339.8 1444.6 1324,3 1176.2 1238.0 1214.4 1328.5 1250.5 1207.7 1290.4 M 12 1429 1484 1501 1301.4 1304.9 1327.0 91_1%0 87_9% 88_4% 88.2% 1303.6 1433.2 1552.6 1423.3 1264.1 1330.6 1331.0 1456.1 1370.6 1323.7 Total 17,745 17,476 17,341 17,529 17,147 16,978 98.8% 98.1%v 97.9% 98.3% 16885.1 16758.7 16544.816487.0 16570.4 16713.3 16822,2 16968.0 16996.717113.0 U Change -381.9 -168.3 -93.36 -126.46 -213.87 -57.82 83.44 142.88 108.90 145.82 28.65 116.36 Pet -2.2% •1.0%a 45% 47% •1.3%0 -0.3% 0.5% 0.9% 0.7% 0.9% 0.2% 0.7% w Note;FTE Numbers include Satellite.Percentages for Satellite were based on this years October numbers. Numbers may not add to exact totals due to rounding E r r a B-2 Packet Pg. 178 6.D.f Q. APPENDIX C E m STUDENT GENERATION RATE DATA o Q c c� The District did not prepare updated student generation rate data for the 2023 Capital Facilities Plan as the District is not requesting the collection of school impact fees. Future CFP updates may E include updated student generation rates to support impact fee calculations. c as E Q c as E as w N a+ LL V C a m .y C N t L Q E O V O �L d V IL o� N ti M C t 2 I t� r z K W r-� C E t c� r� Q C-l Packet Pg. 179 6.D.g 4' KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT �. EQUITY EXCELLENCE COMMUNITY 0 N N a Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 2022-2023 through 2028-2029 E a June 2023 E w Kent School District No. 415 12033 SE 2561h Street Kent, Washington 98030-6643 (253) 373-7526 r .Q 0 U c BOARD of DIRECTORS a m Mr. Joe Bento, President Ms. Meghan Margel, Vice Director z as Ms. Leslie Hamada, Legislative Representative a Mr. Awale Farah, Director 0 0 Mr. Tim Clark, Director v as r c 0 ADMINISTRATION L Israel Vela = 2 Superintendent of Schools IL Dr. Wade Barringer, Associate Superintendent Strategic Initiatives & Operations N Dave Bussard, Executive Director Operations & Facilities Sara Dumlao, Assistant Director of Business Services a� Y I U r t K W C N E t ca a Packet Pg. 180 6.D.g a Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan N N a Table of Contents E I Executive Summary 1 Q c m II Six Year Enrollment Projection 3 w III - Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" ............................................ 7 as Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students............................................... 7 Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students.................................... 8 r .Q IV- Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools........................................................ 9 U c a. V- Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan.......................................................... 14 c a� VI Portable Classrooms 19 L Q I_ VII - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity 20 ) as r VIII Finance Plan 26 0 a� c �L IX —Summary of Changes to June 2022 Capital Facilities Plan.............................. 34 a x 2 XAppendices..................................................................................................... 35 a rn N ti M a+ C N Y I U r t K W C N E t ca Q Packet Pg. 181 6.D.g - Executive Summary E This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan has been prepared by the Kent School District as the organization's capital facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of y Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Q Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual Plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2023 for the 2023-2024 school c year.This annual update of the Plan reflects no new major capital projects. c This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent E School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all the Q district's needs. The district may prepare interim and periodic Long-Range Capital Facilities E Plans consistent with Board Policies, considering a longer or shorter period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the district as may be required. N as Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, and Renton and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each a jurisdiction. This Plan has also been submitted to the cities of Black Diamond, Maple L) Valley, and SeaTac for their information and inclusion in their Comprehensive Plans. a as In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee- implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and E their own school impact fee ordinances. ci as r This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current c and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and = ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based .2 on specific needs for students of the District. a a� This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. M Functional capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Portables in the interim capacity calculation use Y the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. r x w c a� E ca a 1 Packet Pg. 182 6.D.g The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District's standard of �- E service and the existing inventory of permanent facilities. The District's program capacity of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the state's mandated reduction of class c size to meet the standard of service for Kent School District. Portables provide additional o interim capacity. a Kent School District is the fifth largest (FTE basis) district in the state. Enrollment is electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction ("OSPI")on Form P-223.Although funding apportionment is based on Annual Average Full Time Equivalent (AAFTE), enrollment on October 1 is a widely recognized "snapshot in time"that is used to report the District's enrollment for the year as reported to OSPI. Q c as The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of interim aEi facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The District plans to continue N to satisfy concurrency requirements through the interim use of portables. 2 This Plan currently represents projects in process funded primarily bythe Kent School District's 2016 Bond, as well as the 2018 Capital Levy. Additional information about these projects can a be found on the District's capital projects homepage (link . Additionally, project updates sent v to our community of stakeholders can be accessed on the KSD website link . r_ a Based on revised student generation rates, our capacity and enrollment projections, the District will stay current with non-collection of student impact fee rate for the coming year. For a short overview, see Section IX (Summary of Changes to the June 2022 Capital Facilities Plan). E 0 U as r c 0 a� c L V N ti M a+ C N Y I U r t K W C N E t ca Q 2 Packet Pg. 183 6.D.g II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, enrollment growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years (See E Table 2). For this Plan, the district relied substantially on the results from Dr. Les Kendrick's W study of long-range enrollment forecasts for the Kent School District in the Winter of 2022. o N N King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system (See Table 2). 7.49% of 24,337 King County a live births in 2018 is projected for 1,824 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2023. This is a decrease of 937 live births in King County over the previous year. c a� Early Childhood Education students (also identified as "ECE"), "Early Childhood Special Q Education ("ECSE") students are forecast and reported to OSPI separately on Form P-223H for Special Education Enrollment. Capacity is reserved to serve students in the ECE programs at E m elementary schools. w as In addition to live birth data, enrollment projections for October 1, 2023 going forward rely upon the results of the enrollment study by Dr. Kendrick, utilizing the "medium growth" methodology. r ii Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The District c will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools. Information a on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all > jurisdictions will be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. c a� as The Kent School District serves eight permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County,the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, and Auburn and smaller portions of the cities of SeaTac, 0 Black Diamond, and Maple Valley. r c 0 a� c L V N ti M a+ C N Y I U r t K W C N E t ca Q 3 Packet Pg. 184 6.D.g STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR cv a E "Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments 0 completed within the last ten years. Q c Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School District is as follows: a� E Single Family Elementary .248 Middle School .085 E a Senior High .107 Total .440 E m w as Multi-Family Elementary .130 Middle School .049 Senior High .056 Total .235 a U c a. tv The student generation factor is based on 1,728 new SFD (Single Family Detached) units built between 2017 and 2021. The student generation factor is based on 1,526 new MF (Multi- N c Family) units built during the same period. The multi-family units consisted of 1,222 apartment units and 340 townhome units. a E 0 The District sees an average of 44 students for every 100 single family units that are built and an average of 24 students for every 100 multi-family units that are built. The rate for apartment units is higher than for townhome units. The District sees an average of 29 students 0 a� for every 100 apartment units. 0 m x The student generation rate also varies among apartment developments, based on the .2 B number of bedrooms in the unit. Units with three plus bedrooms have much higher student a generation rates than units that have two or fewer bedrooms. Noting these differences can help the District when planning for future growth from housing. M In preparing the 2022-2023 to 2028-2029 Capital Facilities Plan the District contracted with Y Educational Data Solutions, LLC led by Dr. Les Kendricks, a noted expert in demographic v� studies for school districts, to analyze and prepare the student generation factor. x Within the district's borders there are several income-based and multi-family housing projects w coming on-line in 2022/2023. Once developed with occupancy occurring the District does aa) recognize that the student generation for multi-family housing may impact future Capital Facilities Plan updates. One multi-family project worth noting, Covington Commons which appears to have many units with three-plus bedrooms and is likely to show better student a growth than the medium project once completed. 4 Packet Pg. 185 6.D.g KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 OCTOBER REPORT 1251 H (HEADCOUNT) ENROLLMENT HISTORY a E For 2023 UP - Headcount Enrollment History o fn LB=Live Births LB in 2008 LB in 2009 LB in 2010 LB in 2011 LB in 2012 LB in 2013 LB in 2014 LB in 2015 LB in 2016 LB in 201 i fn a October HC Enrollment 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 King County Live Births' 25,222 25,057 24,514 24,630 25,032 24,910 25,348 25,487 26,011 25,274 C a) Incr/(Decr) 323 (165) (543) 116 402 (122) 438 139 524 (737) E Kindergarten/Birth% 1 8.40% 8.34% 8.34% 8.17% 8.14% 7.98% 7.93% 6.68% 7.06% 7.42% C N Kindergarten 2,119 2,090 2,045 2,013 2,037 1,989 2,010 1,703 1,837 1,875 Q Grade 1 2,186 2,127 2,131 2,067 2,056 2,061 2,036 1,882 1,768 1,945 Grade 2 2,055 2,190 2,163 2,163 2,077 2,008 2,091 1,980 1,817 1,840 Grade 3 1,922 2,070 2,176 2,195 2,143 2,043 1,995 2,001 1,938 1,887 m Grade 4 2,087 1,956 2,089 2,195 2,218 2,118 2,038 1,912 1,924 1,953 w Grade 5 2,008 2,116 1,958 2,103 2,189 2,169 2,120 1,937 1,872 1,953 m Grade 6 2,079 2,023 2,058 1,952 2,120 2,184 2,164 2,024 1,894 1,962 Grade 7 Middle School 2,046 2,104 1,974 2,021 1,922 2,044 2,166 2,010 1,925 1,906 LL Grade 8 2,121 2,091 2,100 2,021 2,043 1,882 2,073 2,086 1,937 1,956 Grade 9 Senior High 2,483 2,428 2,093 2,105 2,006 2,004 1,888 2,006 2,043 21011 Q. Grade 10 " 2,046 2,151 2,165 2,099 2,080 1,946 2,035 1,813 1,959 2,050 v Grade 11 " 1,873 17802 1,818 17865 1,823 17732 1,663 17744 1,583 17677 c Grade 12 " 1,539 1,576 1,742 1,730 1,810 1,654 1,634 1,484 1,656 1,467 a Total Enrollment 2 26,564 26,724 26,512 26,529 26,524 25,834 25,913 24,582 24,153 24,482 > y C Yearly Headcount (48) 160 (212) 17 (5) (690) 79 (1,331) (429) 329 t Incr/(Decr) L Cumulative Incr/(Decr) (267) (107) (319) (302) (307) (997) (918) (2,249) (2,678) (2,349) Q E Change to Full Day Kindergarten for all schools �j This number indicates actual births in King County 5 years prior to enrollment year as updated by Washington State Department of Health,Center for Health Statistics.Kent School District percentage based on actual Kindergarten enrollment 5 years later. C 2 Enrollment reported to OSPI on Form P-223 generates basic education funding and excludes Early Childhood Special Education 00Y ("ECSE"&"B2"or Birth to 2 Preschool Inclusive Education)and excludes College-only Running Start students. L d V a o� N ti M C N I t� z K W r-� C d E t c� R r Q Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 1 May 2023 5 Packet Pg. 186 6.D.g KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX - YEAR ENROLLMENT PROJECTION a E 2022 - 2028 Enrollment Projections 0 Full Day Kindergarten at all Elem LB in 2017 LB in 2018 LB in 2019 LB in 2020 1 LB in 2021 Est LB in 2022 Est.LB in 2023 N ACTUAL Q ENROLLMENT PROJECTED ENROLLMENT R October 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 c m King County Live Births 25,274 24,337 24,090 23,686 23,428 23,583 23,973 E Incr/(Decr) (213) (937) (247) (404) (258) 155 390 Kindergarten/Birth % 7.42% 7.49% 7.53% 7.60% 7.60% 7.75% 7.75% E FD Kindergarten 1,875 1,824 1,814 1,801 1,781 1,827 1,858 Q Grade 1 1,945 1,937 1,893 1,902 1,888 1,849 1,897 Grade 2 1,840 1,967 1,960 1,945 1,954 1,930 1,890 E m Grade 3 1,887 1,871 2,003 2,016 2,000 2,009 1,985 w Grade 4 1,953 1,874 1,861 2,012 2,025 2,009 2,018 0 m Grade 5 1,953 1,964 1,887 1,893 2,047 2,060 2,044 =_ Grade 6 1,962 1,995 2,008 1,949 1,955 2,114 2,128 0 c� Grade 7 Middle School 1,906 1,939 1,975 2,007 1,948 1,954 2,113 W Grade 8 1,956 1,903 1,936 1,991 2,024 1,964 1,970 +° Grade 9 Senior High 2,011 1,993 1,941 1,995 2,051 2,085 2,024 Grade 10 " 2,050 2,009 1,991 1,959 2,013 2,070 2,104 V c Grade 11 " 1,677 1,798 1,763 1,765 1,736 1,784 1,834 Grade 12 " 1,467 1,585 1,691 1,675 1,677 1,649 1,695 a) m Total Enrollment Projection 1, 24,482 1 24,659 1 24,723 24,910 25,099 25,304 25,560 > .y C Yearly Incr/(Deer) (100) 177 64 187 189 205 256 t a� Yearly Incr/(Decr)% -0.41% 0.72% 0.26% 0.76% 0.76% 0.82% 1.01% Q E Total Enrollment Projection* 24,482 24,659 24,723 24,910 25,099 25,304 25,560 0 *Does not include iGrad,RS t C Live births for King County are estimates for year 2022&2023 0 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study Dec'22("Medium Growth Model") L d V a o� N ti M C N I t� z K W r-� C d E t c� R r Q Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 May 2023 6 Packet Pg. 187 6.D.g III - Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County c Code 21A.06.1225 references a "standard of service" that each school district o N must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service Q identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the District which would best serve the student population. c This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as Q "impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower-class size at those facilities. Portables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard a) of service as the permanent facilities. N A) The standard of service defined herein will continue to evolve in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service. This a process will affect various aspects of the District's standard of service and future U changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. a as Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students N • Class size ratio for grades K - 3 is planned for an average of 23 students CL per class, not to exceed 26. E 0 • Class size ratio for grades 4- 6 is planned for an average of 27 students U per class, not to exceed 29. r c 0 Some special programs require specialized classroom space and the program capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time = to receive instruction in special programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs. a- rn Students may also be provided with music instruction and physical education M in a separate classroom or facility. , a� Y Some identified students will also be provided educational opportunities in U classrooms for special programs such as those designated as follows: x Multilingual Learner Education (MLE) w Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title 1) —Federal Program Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) —State Program E ca a Packet Pg. 188 6.D.g Highly Capable Students—State Program E Reading, math or science Labs Dual Language Programs in four elementary schools and one middle school c 0 N N a Inclusive Education Service for Elementary and Secondary students with disabilities may be provided in a separate or self-contained classroom sometimes with a capacity of 10-15 students, depending on the program. c a� E Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students a E The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and w educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect a the capacity of the school buildings per the negotiated collective bargaining agreement with KEA. U_ r • The average class size ratio for grades 7-8 is 30 students per class and 143 students per day,with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 150 based on five class periods per day. a • The average class size ratio for grades 9-12 is 32 students per class and 153 students per day,with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 160 based on five class periods per day. L Q E Like Inclusive Education Programs listed above, many other secondary programs v require specialized classroom space which can reduce the functional capacity of r the permanent school buildings, such as technology labs, performing arts c activities, a variety of career and technical education programs, and other specialized programs. as x Space or Classroom Utilization a a� Asa result of scheduling conflicts for student programs,the need for specialized ti rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a workspace during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the Kent School District has determined that the standard utilization r rate is 95%for secondary schools. Functional capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level. w c a� E �a a 8 Packet Pg. 189 6.D.g IV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent functional capacity to house 33,847 students and Q. interim (portable) capacity to house 4,161. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of E Service as set forth in Section III. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity (See Table 3). The ratio between permanent capacity o and portable capacity is 87.8% - 12.2%. y a The functional capacity is periodically updated for changes in the programs, additional classrooms, and new schools. Functional capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect E program changes implemented in the Fall of 2022. E a Calculation of Elementary, Middle School and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B, and C. Maps of existing schools are included. E as w For clarification, the following is a brief description of some of the non-traditional programs for students in Kent School District: U_ iGrad - Kent School District has developed the Individualized Graduation and Degree Program r or "iGrad". iGrad is an Open Door (Drop-out Reengagement) School that offers a second plus chance to students aged 16-21 who have dropped out of high school or are at risk of not c earning a high school diploma by age 21. iGrad is not included in this Capital Facilities Plan, a because it is served as a leased space at the Kent Hill Plaza Shopping Center. Over the past three years, enrollment in the iGrad program has averaged over 250 students. a� as Kent Virtual Academy - The Kent Virtual Academy is open to grades 6-12 and is currently a serving 171 students. The virtual school offers a flexible learning experience designed to E engage students when and where they work best. Each school day will include a combination of live(synchronous)virtual instruction and on-demand (asynchronous) learning opportunities r outside of a traditional bell schedule. Students can attend live virtual lessons with their c teachers and classmates, participate in live virtual class or small group discussions, check-in or L meet with teachers, watch recorded video lessons, work independently on projects and lessons, participate in learning experiences outside the school setting for credit or to meet X competencies.Virtual school students may also attend their boundary school for select classes and services. a- a� N ti M a+ C N Y I U r t K W C N E t ca Q 9 Packet Pg. 190 6.D.g 2022-2023 cc SCHOOL Year ABR ADDRESS Functional Capacity C Opened _ 13 d 2 Carriage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235-140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 550 V Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042 576 G to Covington Elementary 2018 CO 25811 156th Avenue SE,Covington 98042 620 Q Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225-180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 504 East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 626 = Emerald Park 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 602 M Fairwood Elementary 1969 FW 16600-148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 490 C George T.Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 446 tv E Glenridge Elementary 1996 GR 19405-120th Avenue SE,Renton 98058 602 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700-191 st Place SE, Kent 98042 564 y Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641-144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 578 E Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915-186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 596 Q r Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700-64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 550 C Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660-142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 658 0) Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 580 d Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710-108th Avenue SE,Kent 98030 522 W Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621-140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 608 d Millennium Elementary 2000 MIL 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98030 580 Neely-O'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 522 V Panther Lake Elementary 2009 PL 12022 SE 216th Street,Kent, 98031 546 li Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 642 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825-118th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 648 to Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030-162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 578 0. River Ridge Elementary 2021 RR 00000-22420 Military Rd S SeaTac,WA 858 U Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135-228th Ave SE,Black Diamond 98010 554 Scenic Hill Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030 600 Soos Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 508 d d Springbrook Elementary 1969 SB 20035-100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 564 > Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300-132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 578 C 0) Elementary TOTAL 16,850 L Q Cedar Heights Middle School 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 Street,Covington 98042 1,112 E Mattson Middle School 1981 MA 16400 SE 251 st Street, Covington 98042 922 G U Meeker Middle School 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 1,154 d Meridian Middle School 1958 MM 23480-120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 884 Mill Creek Middle School 2005 MC 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 1,058 = Northwood Middle School 1996 NW 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 1,090 G Canyon Ridge Middle School 1966 CR 11000 SE 264th Street,Kent 98030 0 C Middle School TOTAL 6,220 N 2 Kent-Meridian High School 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98030 2,211 V Kentlake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street,Kent 98042 2,516 Kentridge Senior High School 1968 KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 2,940 d Kentwood Senior High School 1981 KW 25800-164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 2,608 O! N Senior High TOTAL 10,275 ti M Kent Laboratory Academy 2021 KA 00000-208th St Kent,WA 98030 502 Kent Virtual Academy KVA No hard Building N Y i-Grad Program IG Not a KSD Building I U DISTRICT TOTAL 33,847 t K W r-� C d E s Q 10 Packet Pg. 191 6.D.g Kent School District 2022/ 23 School Year High School Boundaries 00. E N Tukwila ca L �C� O Q SeaTac E C N Kentridge Q High School d m LU to O Maple cc Valley LL cc Q. Kent Kent-Meridian U High School r_ Kentwood M • High School• m .y C N Co ngton t N Q O U d Kentlake High School O c �L Lea Hill to N 2 tt Auburn a o� 0 2 4 8 Miles N I I I I I I I I I King County,WA State Parks GIS,Esri,HERE,Garmin,SafeGraph,METI/NASA, .~M. USGS,Bureau of Land Management, EPA,NPS,USDA +, C N Legend High School 0 Kentridge High W Buildings School C Kent-Meridian C Kentwood High High School School �. a 0 Kentlake High School Packet Pg. 192 Kent School District 2022/ 23 School Ye 6K Middle School Boundaries M E 1 uk'vlla m N0 a Northwood R Middle SeaTac •School c d E Meeker Q Middle d School m • W J N Mill Creek Maple v Middle Meridian Mattson Valley LL School Middle Middle • School Schoolcc a Kent • U c cc IL a) .y C N Co ngton a� CL E O Cedar Heights U Middle School O a� c �L Lea Hill = tt IL Auburn cm N ti 2 4 8 MIIeS King County,WA State Parks GIS,Esri,HERE,Ga min SafeGraph METI N SA, I i i i I i i i I USGS,Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS,USDA N Legend 0 Cedar Heights Meeker Middle Mill Creek W Middle School School Middle School 0 Mattson Middle Meridian Northwood E School Middle School Middle School Middle Schools a 12 Packet Pg. 193 Kent School District 2022/ 23 School Ye 6.D.g Elementary School Boundaries Iz E Tukwila m Fairwood +' Elementar/ A' 0 IV O to Q Ridgewood � Carriage •Elementar) Crest • +- SeaTac Elementary Springbrook Glenr*dge • Elementary Elementary • Q C E eral Park •EI me tary LakeYoungs E Panthertak • Elementary W River Ridge Elementary Soos Cre k N Elementary lement • O Sunrise a k Orcha d Elementar Maple v rElementary El(mentar p ast Hill Valley Li Elementa • ar in Q Sortun c0 Kent Daniel• Elementa y Crestwood Element ry Meridian Elementar Scenic Hill Elementary d Elementary Ceda Iley a)• Millenni m Covington ins k•Elem ntary •y Elementary y Elementar N eadow Ri g% Covingt n • lementar Horizon ` Q • *Pine Tree Elementary E Elementa y Grass Lake O •Elementary t C O i31 C •L Sawyer Woods N Lea Hill Elementary • _ tt IL Auburn cm N ti 2 4 8 MileS King County,WA State Parks GIS,Esri,HERE,Ga min SafeGraph METI N SA, I I I I I I I I I USGS,Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS,USDA N Legend U 0 Carriage Crest 0 East Hill 0 Horizon 0 Meadow Ridge 0 Park Orchard Scenic Hill Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary z 0 Cedar Valley 0 Emerald Park 0 Jenkins Creek 0 Meridian 0 Pine Tree Soos Creek W Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary 0 Covington Fairwood 0 Kent Millennium 0 Ridgewood 0 Springbrook Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary 0 Crestwood 0 Glenridge 0 Lake Youngs C�Neely 0 Brien 0 River Ridge 0 Sunrise v Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Ip r 0 Daniel 0 Grass Lake 0 Martin Sortun 0 Panther Lake 0 Sawyer Woods • Elementary Q Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Schools 13 Packet Pg. 194 6.D.g V - Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan In November 2016, the voters of the Kent School District approved a bond measure for c $252 million. This bonding authority provided for the replacement of Covington Elementary o school,which opened in August of 2018, the new River Ridge Elementary school, and our new Q Kent Laboratory Academy, which both opened in August 2021. c As a critical component of capital facilities planning, county and city planners and decision- makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks E for pedestrian safety to and from school and bus stops as well as bus pull-outs and turn- Q arounds. a E as Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified bythe District which N are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future (See Table 4&Sitemap). U_ Voter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is a secured for the purchase of additional sites, but some may be funded with impact fees as L) needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements, and M a. some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. c The Board will continue an annual review of standards of service and those decisions will be reflected in each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. a E 0 Our District went out for a Bond Measure in April of 2023 and did not receive enough votes v as for approval. We are currently re-evaluating district needs and looking at next steps that align r with the Strategic Plan which continues to make a priority to revitalize, rejuvenate and rebuild 0 our aging schools as well as begin a process to remove interim classroom portables and find room or create permanent structures to reduce and eventually eliminate the more than 166 portable classrooms in our district. We will continue to determine capacity versus enrollment = as well as programs to ensure this goal to reduce and or eliminate all portables in our district is obtained in the next several years. a- a� N As a part of the planning process, the District has been tracking a few major development M projects which have affected enrollment and will continue to increase students' forecasts. On Meeker Street in Kent we have seen several major apartment complexes, ETHOS and Midtown Y 64 Apartments. These continue to have an impact on enrollment as they fill up their newly built facilities. Alexian Gateway Project is located on the corner of Military Road and Veterans Drive in Kent and will begin occupying its 283 planned units in 2023-2024. x w In Covington,we are tracking a multi-family house development which has been approved and construction has begun. The 1700-unit Lakepointe Urban Community will fall within our �a a 14 Packet Pg. 195 6.D.g enrollment boundary and proposed completion of Phase 4 is shown to be 2027. Construction in the Kent School District boundaries have been steadily rising over the last four E years and planned communities are now being recognized through the planning teams in multiple city and county jurisdictions we serve. o N Q C R r-+ C d E C O E Q C O E d W w .0 R LL R .r .Q R U c R d d c O t a� L Q E O U a� t r c O C �L V N ti M C Y I U r t x w r c a� E R Q 15 Packet Pg. 196 6.D.g APARTMENT PROJECTS WITH MULTIPLE BUILDINGS SHALL HAVE MONUMENT SIGNS------- SHOWING THE STREET ADDRESSES OF EACH BUILDING AT EACH VEHICLE ENTRANCE TO THE SITE. EACH ETHICAL ENTRANCE SHALL ALSO HAVE AN ILLUMINATED SITE PLAN AND/OR DIRECTLY SIGNS. THE SIGNS SHALL SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE SIGN (THE VIEWER'S I /< CURRENT LOCATION)AND ALL BUILDING ADDRESSES. DWELLING NUMBERS SHALL BE \ INCLUDED. THE MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL HAVE A CONTRASTING BACKGROUND COLOR. ALL SITE SIGNAGE TO BE PER OWNERS SPECIFICATION AND DESIGN AND UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. KATERRA " INDICATE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF ILLUMINATED BUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE. SIGNAGE FOR BUILDINGS MUST INCLUDE THE ENTIRE BUILDING ADDRESS AND STREET NAME. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE NO LESS THAN SIX(6) INCHES IN HEIGHT. THE BUILDING SIGN SHALL HAVE A CONTRASTING BACKGROUND COLOR. I I 542 1 st AVE. SOUTH, FLOOR 4 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 ALL DRAWINGS,SPECIFICATIONS,PLANS,IDEAS, ARRANGEMENTS AND DESIGNS REPRESENTED OR REFERRED TO ARE THE PROPERTY OF AND ARE OWNED BY KATERRA INC.WHETHER THE PROJECT FOR WHICH THEY ARE MADE IS EXECUTED OR NOT.THEY WERE CREATED, EVOLVED,DEVELOPED AND PRODUCED FOR THE SOLE USE ON AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT AND NONE OF THE ABOVE MAY BE DISCLOSED OR GIVEN TO OR USED BY ANY PERSON,FIRM OR CORPORATION FOR ANY USE OR PURPOSE WHATSOEVER INCLUDING ANY OTHER PROJECT,EXCEPT UPON WRITTEN PERMISSION AND / — ——— — _ _ — — — DIRECTION OF KATERRA INC. _ _ _ ©2019 KATERRA ARCHITECTURE LLC ©2019 KATERRA ARCHITECTURE II LLC ©2019 KATERRA ARCHITECTURE III PLLC ©2019 KATERRA ARCHITECTURE IV LLC I 1 ______� -- I I Consultant3102 ------- 3202 310']�� 30 31116 &3101 i �� 3302 3203 i 3206 3207 3210 3211 1 3201� 3402 3303 ; 3306 3307 3310 3311 3301 U TRASH ENCLOSURES 3403 I 3406 3407 3410 3411 3401 0 - ' � I Ild 1�3a ----------- --------------------- ------------- ----------------J-L---------------- 3 ---- 1�3$ TRASH EN OS RES ---- ------------------------- 311 3214 I Owner -"',�3'1 v 3314 l \ 1 3� * \ 3101 3104 3105 3108 3109 3112 3414 12 \ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' I ' � \ 3204 3205 3208 3209 3212 I TCR \ g3� 3201 1p3 \ 3301 3304 3305 3308 3309 312 l \ \ \ \ 3401 3404 3405 3408 3409 3412 I TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL - -- - - - ---z � -- - OEM 0-- --- -- ------------------- �33 °� 3116 �3115 I \ \ \ D 3216 &3215 3316 3315 3416 3415 - ------------- --I v ------ 3118 3217 3218 3317 3318 iI ML v �A\,Lg3 '�Zg1 °3' 3417 3418 I C `r--m ,�33FY1 1 ENCLOSURES +, v \`, TRASH - I r9 0 G 0 G 0 0 G 0 G 0 2 \\ \ ------ -------- r--- -- - 3119 g3 ,�33 3 p i c 0 0 0 3220 3219 I� A - 3320 3319 c 3420 3419 I� E ` ------ --- �3ZO --�I 3122 I = 3221 j 3222 I E \ t -�22� 2 205 22° 3321 3322 I °� 132�'1 / 230 23� 3421 3422 - I y \ ��2 / 2p0 2 I a± y \ AMENITY SPACE I v \ IL CL �A\32$ t� v �� �p2 v v 2� n r------------------ l 2 6 v v v 22� 0 l 3123 I a 3223 I > 3323 _ v 25 23 y v c' 3224 3423 d \ ` 1 325 12 23 \ = -- 3324 L- \ 1��26 109 , 0 3424 Key plan CL O9 22 a 0 \ , Q \ 2 3°9 r' 25N'\ v TRASH ENCLOSUR o 1,�32 2 - ?0 W — — _ \ ,-- �2 ' Professional Seal 3 1 19 v C� a \ 11 11N 9 TRASH ENC URES \\ ,�A\3 \ n O N .- v ,Z213 \ 0 � E I �c _,.E 8 V Y {+ No 1000, LIS STA - 1 s \\ 1 11 1131 5 \\ 2450, \, ALEXAN a 116 o GATEWAY 11216 APARTMENTS A 23000 MILITARY RD S, 6 O 0 O G I<ENT, WA 98032 '11 \ 11 1 O G Drawn By RM Project Manager RIM / Job Number 075-18001 Date Of Original 12/13/19 / Revisions \ 1° n�0 �\ \ ✓ ��A,�O ` ,�06 \ ��vobt vv / Mark Date Description 1�2° t` "' � \ / / 0 06/12/2019 PERMIT SET 2 01/09/2020 REV.3 ITCD ��0 9 \ 1 "v, / UPDATES -� , ---- ,-� - � � � 6 05/22/2020 PC1 CORRECTIONS 1209 / LEGEND 3 / ONE BEDROOM UNITS 000, --------------- \ 1 06 � ;--------------� TWO BEDROOM UNITS 03 11�06 �. / 2° THREE BEDROOM UNITS I FC SET o 11�0'1 / 10/30/2020 / TYPE A UNITS \ \ 00, \ / ' ----- NO UNIT - GARAGE ONLY \ UNIT BUILDING SIGNAGE NUMBERING/ NORTH ADDRESSING i 1 . UNIT NUMBERS READ TOP TO SHEET(1 ,2,3) BOTTOM (FLOOR 1 -4) AS INDICATED ON THE UNIT STACK UNIT NUMBERING PLAN G - 00 - 014 1 SCALE: 3/64"= V-0" 16 Packet Pg. 197 Phasin Le end NOTE: 6.D.g g g I I THE LOCATION OF DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDINGS ROADWA TRAILS, IS APPROXIMATE AND DOES NOT VEST TO THIER SPECIFIC WILL Phase 1 A - Maple Hills Division 5 LOCATION. THE LOCATION OF ALL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE BASED Preliminary Plat approval in third Quarter 2021. Construction and Final ON EXISTING CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION AND THE Plat Recording 2022. TERMS OF THE PLANNED ACTION, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE,AND FEDERAL LAWS. E Phase I B - Approximate Years 2019-2024 0 Establishment of final grade, construction of Covington Connector to a Southeast boundary, construction of first phase of commercial p development. N Q Phase 2 - Approximate Years 2020-202S Establishment of final lake perimeter, construction of 191 st Place SE f° extension and associated R-12 residential development, construction of second phase of commercial development on peninsula. E Phase 3 - Approximate Years 2023-2028 Construction of third phase of commercial development. Q Phase 4 - Approximate Years 2020-2027 Completion of gravel it reclamation, construction of MR and Phase 3 m P g P W �R-12 residential development � w U M LL f0 O � f6 U Phase 1 B a. SF Phase I A y Zs6th St O ' o Phase 4 E a O U O m m t r c O O L Phase 2 a. FT .. die N O M C N O YI SE 260th St U O h O X Q e- W O != Lakepointe Urban Village Phasing Map N ° �0 200Q AI,POI NTE SCALE: 400 �� lanuar Updated Septembi Packet Pg. 198 Legend NOTE: Medium Density Residential(R-6) ' Focal Point/Public Gathering Spot THE LOCATION OF DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDINGS ROADWAY,-) High Density Residential(R-12) Gateway Element TRAILS, IS APPROXIMATE AND DOES NOT VEST TO THIER SPECIFIC LOCATION. THE LOCATION OF ALL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE BASED Mixed Residential(MR) Proposed Park and Ride Facility \ ON EXISTING CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION AND THE TERMS OF THE PLANNED ACTION, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CL Mixed Use/Commercial(RCMU) © Transit Stop AND APPLICABLE LOCAL,STATE,AND FEDERAL LAWS. E - Mix of Multi-Family and Commercial is Proposed Truck and Bus Return Route Encouraged within Peninsula Area _-- _ Public Streets Stop Light O © Central Pond Feature cab Bike Route . Proposed Trail Parking Wetland O Ir-c"� - / M Wetland Buffer Jenkins Creek Pedestrian/Wildlife Undercrossing � � � � . .. .W ..W' �',;,�...✓ ..� .� W..f'. . . � C Publicly Accessible Parks and Plazas �� "� E Landscape Areas .. .. .W . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . _ E Disturbed(Graded)Open Space . � R E Undisturbed Open Space . . . . . . . W W W W W . Q .. 1 CDCovington Highlands Trail W W W �- E � R-6 OPEN SPACE � ... / 1,880,037SF ... �, I - •.- Trails/Offsite Trail Connections 0 43.16 AC . 1 LU r Steep Slope and Buffer I\-------� R24,956 SF PARKS MR OPEN SPACE tt O.S7 AC 20.52 7 SF MR PARKS \ R-6 OPEN SPACE O 12.799 SF 57,182 SF � B 0.29 AC OPEN SPACE 1 1.31 AC cwo& 5,687 SF I Q AC `o�0e .. / C fC . ► o / J V do R-12 PARK ♦ 32,553 SF 0.75 AC R-6 PARKS 00 ♦•� 9,908 SF d SPECIAL PAVEMENT R-6 PARKS I ID I I 0.23 AC d ♦ 14,112 SF l I 1� - ♦�,,� 0.32 AC 1 V FUTURE CONNECTION •N BEYOND PROPERTY BY j OTHERS ..a. MR PARKS •;;.'`"• R-6 OPEN SPACE t © 110,686 SF /,� 139.837 SF 3.21 AC L. � MR PARKS - 128.425 SF G O 2.95AC U R-12 OPEN SPACE -12 PARKS /.✓". .kp / G1 y, 4,549 SF 12,500 SF \! 47--r/ t 0.10 AC 0.29 AC RCMU OPEN ® C SPACE i' ,y, �� O 86,894 SF 1.9 1 , 1.99 AC CENTRAL POND FEATURE \ 1 RCMU PARKS � � � � •L w R-12 PARKS 97,621 SF - R-12 PARKS 7,2S4 SF 2.24 AC .,...., 14,185 SF IN 9 fi 0.17 AC R 12 OPEN SPACE 0.33 AC / COMBINED OPEN SPACE TABLE v '• "., 13.14AC / , � ,�r ZONE GROSS PARKS OPEN SPACE* POND TOTAL NET ACRES** .0 4 IL s ( ' / ACREAGE AMENITIES _ a R-12 OPEN SPACE \� ., � ~ /�`� RCMU 91.25 AC 2.81 AC 1.99 AC 8.41 AC 13.21 AC 78.03 AC 34,788 SF ` " I MR 34.00 AC 5.78 AC 0.52 AC 2.43 AC 8.73 AC 25.27 AC N / ti �' _ �` r R-6 53.51 AC 0.55 AC 47.68 AC 0.00 AC 48.23 AC 5.27 AC R-12 35.34 AC 1.53 AC 14.17 AC 7.67 AC 23.37 AC 11.98 AC ++ C sue« t,q � x� �y �� •= TOTAL 214.I0 AC 10.67 AC 64.36 AC 18.51 AC 93.55 AC 120.55 AC d �1 *OPEN SPACE INCLUDES CRITICAL AREAS,BUFFERS,AND OTHER GREEN SPACES "I\ +Pe V •�1 NET ACRES EQUALS GROSS ACREAGE MINUS TOTAL AMENITIES z i• r 3. ** .t _ _ . PARKS TABLE OPEN SPACE TABLE POND TABLE ' �.; .�:.r, �"' `���� "� - �.° 1 y� - ` J ... "y ,� :� �\, ZONE SQFOOTAGE ACREAGE ZONE SQFOOTAGE ACREAGE ZONE SQFOOTAGE ACREAGEAWL s ° - ~- _ - -! � - RCMU 122,577 SF 2.81 AC RCMU 86,984 SF 1.99 AC RCMU 366,128 SF 8.41 AC K It, �_ -r;. IL••# 'R_'-" '�'� _ � i w�s°t•. „jam,_ MR 251,910 SF 5.78 AC MR 22,507 SF 0.52 AC MR 106,040 SF 2.43 AC W - ` '9 R 6 24,020 SF 0.55 AC R 6 2,077,056 SF 47.68 AC R 6 0 SF 0.00 AC fi Syr- �„� � s. * � #�,, ,•`� �,fy.� R 12 66,492 SF 1.53 AC R 12 617,234 SF 14.17 AC R 12 334,094 SF 7.67 AC TOTAL 464,999 SF 10.67 AC TOTAL 2,803,691 SF 64.36 AC TOTAL 806,262 SF 18.51 AC ' -^ � 1� #'►�'����:��y ��-'�--'�- `��✓Jt� '/j� jam" ',sue. �. � s V Lakepointe Urban Village Master Development Plan -/N ° °° Z°° �f) SCALE. I`= 400 OAKPOINTE 18 Ian Updated Septe Packet Pg. 199 6.D.g VI - Portable Classrooms The Plan references use of portables as interim capacity for facilities. ! 0 N Currently,the District utilizes portables to house students more than functional capacity and for Q program purposes at some school locations (Please see Appendices A, B,Q. c Based on enrollment projections, implementation of full day kindergarten programs, lower state mandated class sizes, functional capacity, and no need for additional interim capacity, the District anticipates no need to purchase or lease additional portables during the next six- E year period to ensure capacity requirement(Noted in section V. Six Yr. Planning Construction). Q c a� During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the a) District's portables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of N the portables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in 2 others, and these portables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. r .Q Portables may be used as interim facilities: U c 0 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. IL as 2. To cover the gap between the times of demand for increased capacity and '— completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. a 3. To meet unique program requirements. a E Portables currently in the District's inventory are continually evaluated resulting in some being v improved and some replaced or when possible, be removed due to life expectancy. The r Districts goal is to reduce and or eliminate all portables so we may provide an equitable c learning environment for all. L The Plan projects that the District will use portables to accommodate interim housing needs = for the next six years and beyond. The use of portables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between portables, emerging a technologies, and educational restructuring will continue to be examined. N ti M a+ C N Y I U r t K W C N E t ca Q 19 Packet Pg. 200 6.D.g VII - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity E As stated in Section IV, the functional capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size requirements, class size fluctuations etc. As shown in y the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3, the functional capacity is also reflected in the Q capacity and enrollment comparison charts (See Tables 5& 5a-b-c). c c Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding E apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment "snapshot in time" to report enrollment for the year. E a Kent School District continues to be the fifth largest district (both FTE and headcount basis) E in the state of Washington. The P-223 Headcount for October 2022 was 24,482 with w kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECSE and college-only Running Start students. In October 2022, there were an additional 877 students in 11th and 12th grade participating in the Running Start program at different colleges and receiving credits toward both high a school and college graduation. Of these students, 486 attended classes only at the college L) ("college-only") and are excluded from FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment M a. comparisons. Kent School District has one of the highest Running Start program participation rates in the state. c as Based on the enrollment forecasts, permanent facility inventory and capacity, a current standard of service, portable capacity, and future additional classroom space, the o District plans to continue to satisfy required capacity through the interim use of portables v (See Table 5 and Tables 5 a-b-c). r While the district currently shows available capacity to address projected need on a purely c statistical basis, there are variety of extenuating factors that need to be considered. The Kent c L School District currently makes significant use of portables, which we do not consider as part of our permanent standard of service. We have included portable space in our interim capacity figures, and we do not count that as a permanent space solution. Kent is unusual in that it incorporates neighborhoods intersecting with at least 6 municipalities, including Kent, a Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, Renton, and SeaTac. The district covers 73 square miles and includes over 40 schools. Within this large geographic area, we expect to have pockets of localized capacity need that are not necessarily reflected in the aggregate figures. As one example,the Lakepointe Urban Village development in Covington may require new classroom UI capacity even as space may exist in schools on the far other end of the district's boundaries. r x w c a� E ca a 20 Packet Pg. 201 6.D.g KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY Q TOTAL DISTRICT E 0 N N a SCHOOL YEAR 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 E Actual P R O J E C T E D 4) a) E a Permanent Functional Capacity 1 33,847 I 34,529 I 34,529 I 34,529 I 34,529 I 34,529 I 34,529 C d E Changes to Permanent Capacity W Capacity Increase(F) N a� :r R LL r .Q Additional Permanent Classrooms 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 U U c tv d m Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 33,847 34,529 34,529 34,529 34,529 34,529 34,529 c W t Interim Portable Capacity Q Elementary Portable Capacity Required 3,240 3,192 3,192 3,192 3,192 3,192 3,192 E Middle School Portable Capacity Required 336 308 308 308 308 308 308 0 U Senior High School Portable Capacity Required 654 540 540 540 540 540 540 a+ Interim Portable Capacity Total 4,230 4,040 4,040 4,040 4,040 4,040 4,040 0 Im c TOTAL CAPACITY 38,077 38,569 38,569 38,569 38,569 38,569 38,569 M m 2 TOTAL ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 2 24,482 24,659 24,723 24,910 25,099 25,304 25,560 2 d DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 13,595 13,910 13,846 13,659 13,470 13,265 13,009 N ti M 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. +- C N 2 Projection Source:Les Kendrick Demographic Study,2022("Medium Growth Model") Y I U r t K LLI C N E t ca r Q Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 May 2023 21 Packet Pg. 202 6.D.g KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY E SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS: Grades 9 - 12 0 N N a SCHOOL YEAR 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 1 2025-26 1 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 N E Actual P R O J E C T E D W E a Senior High Permanent Capacity' 10,275 I 10,097 I 10,097 I 10,097 I 10,097 I 10,097 I 10,097 E m w as :r u_ Changes to High School Capacity 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I coo U c tv Subtotal 10,275 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 a m c W z a� Portables Interim Capacity 1 654 540 540 540 540 540 540 a E 0 U W TOTAL CAPACITY ' 10,929 10,637 10,637 1 10,637 1 10,637 1 10,637 1 10,637 r c 0 am c ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 3 7,205 7,385 7,386 1 7,394 1 7,477 1 7,588 7,657 x 2 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 3,724 3,252 3,251 3,243 3,160 3,049 2,980 a rn N ti M No Classroom Portables required at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. a� 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. YI 3 Projection Source:Les Kendrick Demographic Study,2022("Medium Growth Model") U r t K W C N E t ca Q Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C May 2023 22 Packet Pg. 203 6.D.g KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY E MIDDLE SCHOOL: Grades 7 - 8 2022-23 O "Middle School: Grades 6-8 2023-24 and Beyond" a 7-8 Middle School Grade 6-8 E E SCHOOL YEAR 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 a� Actual P R O J E C T E D E a G � r d a E d d Middle School Permanent Capacity' 6,220 e 7,216 I 7,216 I 7,216 I 7,216 I 7,216 I 7,216 I N 2 6 8 LL L R 2 0 Q' R Changes to Middle School Capacity 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 3 Subtotal 6,220 2 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 a. m 4 >_ C a N t Portable Interim Capacity 1 336 d 308 I 308 I 308 I 308 I 308 I 308 I C b O TOTAL CAPACITY 1&3 6,556 e 7,524 7,524 7,524 7,524 7,524 7,524 y r o O ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION z 3,862 d 5,837 5,919 5,947 5,927 6,032 6,211 L SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 2,694 1,687 1,605 1,577 1,597 1,492 1,313 = 2 a No Classroom Portables required at middle schools at this time.Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. N ti M 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. ++ C N 2 Projection Source:Les Kendrick Demographic Study,2022("Medium Growth Model") Y I U r t K W C N E t ca Q Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B May 2023 23 Packet Pg. 204 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY 0. E ELEMENTARY: Grades K - 6 Thru 2022-23 "ELEMENTARY.- Grades K- 5 2023-24 and Beyond" 0 0 Q K-6 Elementary Grade K-5 R SCHOOL YEAR 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 1 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Actual P R O J E C T E D m E G r N a E Elementary Permanent Capacity' 16,850 e 16,696 I 16,696 16,696 I 16,696 16,696 I 16,696 K E 5 W N Additional Permanent Classrooms z 0 0 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 2 cc LL Subtotal 16,850 3 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 2 Q- 4 U c Interim Portable Capacity `° 3,240 3,192 3,192 3,192 3,192 3,192 3,192 a m TOTAL CAPACITY112 20,090 19,888 19,888 19,888 19,888 19,888 19,888 c d e t y o � ENROLLMENT PROJECTION 13,415 n 11,437 11,418 11,569 11,695 11,684 11,692 0 0 d U m SURPLUS (DEFICIT)CAPACITY 6,675 8,451 8,470 8,319 8,193 8,204 8,196 c a� c •L Enrollment&Projections reflect FULL Day Kindergarten at ALL Elementary schools @ 1.0&exclude ECSE Preschoolers. 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. _ t,1 2 Additional classrooms will be placed at schools with the greatest need for aleve overcrowding 7 3 Projection Source:Les Kendrick Demographic Study,2022("Medium Growth Model") d O! N ti M C N I U z K W r-� C d E t c� R r Q Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A May 2023 24 Packet Pg. 205 6.D.g VIII - Finance Plan Q E The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2022-2023 through 2028-2029.The financing components include o secured and unsecured funding and impact fees.The plan is based on future bond issues,state y school construction assistance, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Q Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. c a� In November 2016, the District held a special election to approve the authorization of E $252,000,000 in bonding authority. The projects described below are part of this authorization. The first series of bonds ($80 million) were issued in February 2017, which E a funded the Covington Elementary Replacement School, as well as other infrastructure c projects. Impact fees were used at both River Ridge Elementary School and Kent Laboratory E Academy projects due to escalation in construction pricing across the Pacific Northwest. w as According to RCW 82.02.090, the definition of an impact fee is ". . . a payment of money imposed upon development as a condition of development approval to pay for public facilities needed to serve new growth and development, and that is reasonably related to the new r development that creates additional demand and need for public facilities, that is a proportionate share of the cost of the public facilities, and that is used for facilities that ) reasonably benefit the new development. 'Impact fee' does not include a reasonable permit ii or application fee." Mitigation or impact fees can be calculated on the basis of "unhoused student need" or "the maintenance of a district's level of service" as related to new residential development. L Q A mitigation/impact fee may be imposed based upon a determination of insufficient existing o permanent and/or interim portable school space or to pay for permanent and/or newly acquired interim portable school space previously constructed as a result of growth in the r c district. A district's School Board must first approve the application of the mitigation or impact G fees and, in turn, approval must then be granted by the other general government jurisdictions a� L having responsibility within the district, counties, cities and towns. (Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, SeaTac, and Unincorporated King County) U Though the current enrollment projections increase for both elementary and secondary a- schools are relatively flat, the ongoing need to provide permanent instructional facilities to N house students is a driving need as the shifts in our family populations continue, due to ongoing development. Previously collected Impact fees may be used to support and address the challenges related to the number of interim instructional facilities currently in use, the Yi replacement of some of these aged facilities,the maintenance of the district's level of services, r and the potential expansions to existing facilities in future years. x w The Kent School District 2022-2023 CFP update includes continued execution of the 2016 Capital Bond Projects, the 2018 Levy Projects, and the data collection and review of our Facility Assessment E Reports. The District Facilities and Capital Planning Teams have come together and joined the Capital �a a 25 Packet Pg. 206 6.D.g Bond Planning Task Force (CBPTF) which included District personnel, design professionals, teaching -ii, staff, student voices, as well as community members who collaborated and discussed district needs. O Our initial plan revealed priorities including school replacement due to age, and the need for added a permanent facilities to (1) reduce and eliminate our need for portables and (2) accommodate future 5 growth as housing in the Kent region continues to expand. We started with a list of 2 billion in needs y and through itemizing and prioritizing, we brought the list of essential projects to 495 million. This Q list was brought before the District's Board of Directors for comments, discussion, and approval. A Capital Bond Measure followed and went out to vote in April 2023 and did not pass with voter approval. We are now re-evaluating needs and figuring out next steps. Future updates to this Capital Facilities Plan will include details of any adopted planning. With the opening of Canyon Ridge Middle School, our sixth grade moving from elementary to middle school, and our boundary change, we are advancing opportunities to even out capacity at each site to accommodate our programs and Q student-based needs. as For the Six-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School N District Capital Planning Team. Please see pages 13-14 for a summary of the cost basis. Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction estimated costs are based on the last elementary a school built in Kent, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost future elementary school, as L) well as average pricing of nearby school districts recently built new middle and new high 0 school projects. c a� Project Projected Cost a E 0 New Elementary School $68,000,000 v a� r New Middle School $155,000,000 0 a� c New High School $220,000,000 x Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the a- last ten years. Please see Table 7 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. N ti M District Adjustment The impact fee calculations on Appendix B & C result in a zero-dollar impact fee total for this Yi year but may be adjusted if needed per RCW 36.70A.130(2)(b) provision. r x w c a� E ca a 26 Packet Pg. 207 6.D.g KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN E Secured Unsecured Impact E SCHOOL FACILITIES 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 TOTAL Local&State State 2 or Local 3 Fees 5 Q C Estimated Estimated G� E PERMANENT FACILITIES 2 W N d No School Projects at this time. $0 ' ILL R 6. TEMPORARY FACILITIES U Additional portables 3 ° $0 a. a� OTHER N c N/A t d L Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 E E 0 U F = Funded U = Unfunded y t NOTES: 2 The District anticipates receiving some State Funding Construction Assistance for some projects. C L s Facility needs are pending review.Some of these projects may be funded with impact fees. y 2 4 Cost of portables based on current cost and adjusted for inflation for future years. v 5 Fees in this column are based on amount of fees collected to date and estimated fees on future units. a rn N M C d Y I V s X W C d E t v r Q Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 6 May 2023 27 Packet Pg. 208 6.D.g KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions & Costs Average of Sites Purchased, Sold or Built on within last 10 Years a E Year Open/ Type& Purchased #on Map School / Site Sold Location Acreage Cost/Price Avg cost-price/acre Total Average Cost/Acre v O Elementary N N Q No Acquisitions for Elemenary Schools 0.00 $0 �a c E c d E Q r d E Elementary Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 m W Elem site average w m Middle School v co li No Acquisitions for Middle Schools 0.00 $0 0- M U Middle School Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 C Middle Schl Site Avg. 2d d Senior High = d No Acquisitions for Senior Highs 0.00 $0 $0 m a Senior High Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 E O Sr Hi Site Average V m Note:All rural sites were purchased prior to adoption of Urban Growth Area. c Numbers correspond to locations on Site Bank&Acquisitions Map on Page 35. O Properties purchased prior to 2010 L R 1 /Urban Site-Covington area North (So of Mattson MS) 1984 = 2/Rural Site-Ham Lake east (Pollard) 1992 Total Acreage&Cost Total Average Cost/Acre 2 3 4/Urban Site-Shady Lake(Sowers-Blaine-Drahota-Paroline) 1995 0-08 $0 #DIV40! a 5/Rural Site-SE of Lake Morton area (West property) 1993 0 0 0 N r` 9/Rural Site-McMillan Assemblage(South of MC) 98-04 10/Urban Site-Yeh-Williams(W of 132 Ave SE at SE 288) 1999 12/Urban Site-SE 256th Covington(Halleson) 2000 YI U 12a/Urban Site-156th Ave. SE Covington(Wikstrom) 2004 ' 12b/Urban Site-SE 256th St.Covington(West of CO) 2004 X W C d E t t� w r Q Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 7 May 2022 28 Packet Pg. 209 6.D.g KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors -Single Family Student Generation Factors -Multi-Family Q- E Elementary (Grades K-6) 0.248 Elementary 0.130 Middle School (Grades 7-8) 0.085 Middle School 0.049 Senior High (Grades 9- 12) 0.107 Senior High 0.056 0 Total 0.440 Total 0.235 w N a Projected Increased Student Capacity OSPI -Square Footage per Student, see side char Elementary 0 Elementary 115 Middle School 850 Middle School 148 E Senior High (Academy) 0 Senior High 173 = W Special Education ?? E a Required Site Acreage per Facility Elementary (required) 12 Average Site Cost/Acre E Middle School (required) 25 Elementary $161,678 T w Senior High (required) 40 Middle School $0 Senior High $0 New Facility Construction Cost R Elementary $68,000,000 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost IL Middle School $155,000,000 Elementary @ 24 $315,000 a Senior High $220,000,000 Middle School @ 29 $315,000 U Senior High @ 31 $315,000 0 a Temporary Facility Square Footage State Funding Assistance Credit > Elementary 123,702 District Funding Assistance Percentage 51.86% W Middle School 10,256 Senior High 21,296 a Total 4.4% 155,254 Construction Cost Allocation E 0 CCA-Cost/Sq,Ft. $246.83 v a� Permanent Facility Square Footage r Elementary 1,567,594 0 Middle School 760,483 District Average Assessed Value Senior High/Other 1,077,315 Single Family Residence $653,485 .0 Total 95.6% 3,405,392 = 2 Total Facilities Square Footage District Average Assessed Value a Elementary 1,691,296 Multi-Family Residence $220,293 Middle School 770,739 N Senior High/Other 1,098,611 Total 3,560,646 Bond Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 $1.02 Current Rate /1,000 Tax Rate 0.0010 Y I U Developer Provided Sites/Facilities Value 0 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate x Dwelling Units 0 Current Bond Interest Rate 3.58% W c a� CPI Inflation Factor 5.20% E Budget Preparations I OSPI (www.k12.wa.us) Q Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX A) May 2023 29 Packet Pg. 210 6.D.g KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE c� a E Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence 13 Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Capacity)x Student Generation Factor +CD Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre Facility Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary) 12 $161,678 0 0.248 N A 2 (Middle School) 25 $0 850 0.085 $0.00 Q A 3 (Senior High) 40 $0 0 0.107 Total 77 $161,678 850 0.440 A $0.00 +. C Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) .a Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio N B 1 (Elementary) $68,000,000 0 0.248 0.903 E B 2 (Middle School) $155,000,000 850 0.085 0.984 $15,252.00 Q B 3 (Senior High) $220,000,000 0 0.107 0.998 C Total $443,000,000 850 0.440 B $15,252.00 E E Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence(Portables) d W Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Temporary/Total Square Footage Ratio) N Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $315,000 24 0.248 0.097 $315.74 =_ C 2 (Middle School) $315,000 29 0.085 0.016 $14.77 V cv C 3 (Senior High) $315,000 31 0.107 0.020 $21.75 IL Total $945,000 84 0.440 C b $352.25 +OrL State Funding Assistance Credit per Single Family Residence (formerly"State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance% x Student Factor U C Construction cost Allocation SPI Sq.Ft./Student Assistance% Student Factor M D 1 (Elementary) $246.83 115 0.5186 0.248 $3,650.73 IL D 2 (Middle School) $246.83 148 0.5186 0.085 $1,610.32 D 3 (Senior High) $246.83 173 0.5186 0.107 $2,369.52 Z D $7,630.57 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value(AAV) $653,485 Q Net Present Value(per EQ)(NPV) 8.77 E O Current Debt Service Rate/1,000 ( r) 0.10% TC $5,848.83 V d (Below used to calculate NPV) t Current Bond Interest Rate 3.58% _ Years Amortized (10 Years)-Used in NPV Calculation 10 O C Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility/Site Value Dwelling Units M 0 0 FC 0 4) t� Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $0.00 d B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $15,252.00 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $352.25 N Subtotal $15,604.25 M D = State Match Credit per Residence $7,630.57 N TC=Tax Credit per Residence $5,848.83 YI Subtotal $13,479.40 () Total Unfunded Need $2,124.85 s 50%Developer Fee Obligation $1,062 lJxl FC=Facility Credit(if applicable) $0 District Adjustment ($1,062) d E Net Fee Obligation per Residence-Single Family O r Q Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX B) May 2023 30 Packet Pg. 211 6.D.g KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Q. Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Capacity)x Student Generation Factor E Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre Facility Capacity Student Factor 13 A 1 (Elementary) 12 $161,678 0 0.13 CD A 2 (Middle School) 25 $0 850 0.049 $0.00 V A 3 (Senior High) 40 $0 0 0.056 N Total 77 $161,678 850 0.235 Q A $0.00 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit C Formula: Facilit Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor x Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio O (( Y Y P Y) ) ( q 9 ) ++ Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio 4) d B 1 (Elementary) $68,000,000 0 0.13 0.903 E B 2 (Middle School) $155,000,000 850 0.049 0.984 $8,792.33 B 3 (Senior High) $220,000,000 0 0.056 0.998 N Total $443,000,000 850 0.235 B $8,792.33 Q Temporary Facility Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Temporary/Total Square Footage Ratio) d E Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio 41 C 1 (Elementary) $315,000 24 0.13 0.097 $165.51 M C 2 (Middle School) $315,000 29 0.049 0.016 $8.52 N d C 3 (Senior High) $315,000 31 0.056 0.020 $11.38 Total $945,000 84 0.235 C $185.40 C1 tv State Funding Assistance Credit per Multi-Family Residence (formerly"State Match") IL Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance% x Student Factor cC Area Cost Allowance SPI Sq.Ft./Student Equalization% Student Factor •Q D 1 (Elementary) $246.83 115 0.5186 0.13 $1,913.69 ca U D 2 (Middle School) $246.83 148 0.5186 0.049 $928.30 O D 3 (Senior High) $246.83 173 0.5186 0.056 $1,240.12 D 4, $4,082.11 ll d Tax Credit per Multi Family Residence > Average MF Residential Assessed Value(AAV) $220,293 Net Present Value(per EQ)(NPV) 8.77 N t Current Debt Service Rate/1,000 ( r) 0.10% TC b $1,971.67 CL (Below used to calculate NPV) E Current Bond Interest Rate 3.58% O Years Amortized (10 Years)-Used in NPV Calculation 10 d t Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility/Site Value Dwelling Units = 0 0 FC b 0 O ZA C tC Fee Recap** d 2 A = Site Acquisition per Multi-Family Unit $0.00 V B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $8,792.33 C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $185.40 d Subtotal $8,977.73 D = State Match Credit per MF Unit $4,082.11 N TC=Tax Credit per MF Unit $1,971.67 M Subtotal $6,053.78 C Total Unfunded Need $2,923.95 N Y 50%Developer Fee Obligation $1,462 UI FC=Facility Credit(if applicable) 0 District Adjustment ($1,462) �_ s Net Fee Obligation per Residential Unit-Multi-family ($0.00) lJxl C d E s Q Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX C) May 2023 31 Packet Pg. 212 6.D.g KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity Projected Projected %for SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE LOCATION Type Status Completion Program new Date Capacity Growth Approximate TApproximate Map ELEMENTARY E m ca O N MIDDLE SCHOOL&SENIOR HIGH rn a E Additional E TEMPORARY FACILITIES Q Capacity d E d W to N #on 2 OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Land use Land Use v Map Designation Type Jurisdiction u_ 12 256th-Covington(Halleson) 25435 SE 256th,Covington 98042 Rural To be sold King County r .Q 12a 156th-Covington(Wikstrom) 25847 156th Ave.SE,Covington 98042 Rural To be sold King County tU c ca Notes: 1L a� None N c d t N L Q E 0 U a� t c O Cl C L V a an N ti M a+ C d Y I U r t K Lu CD E t v r Q Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 May 2022 32 Packet Pg. 213 6.D.g JINANU 3 eLvO O ( a1ePork W SE 168 ST ¢ �l��r,WeoN Fq��� ElemertaryV ud Golf LOlf2 nerghlsPork > CedorCiovdAirporl� 3 > ¢ ,1 ■ E n pie valle 4 S <170 ST "' S d a > Y "� O ++ MCMIC EN HUB 172 PL p 2 .�, Cedar Mountai _ sT .a� ' J w N sE(7s sT+ SE P rROV sE`Irs+srJ .� + o SE/K + a Q GROJO w o P k ii& Country Club aF s+ 7s o g E ! ITSK ¢ sr-. < SEA�TA +s w a < + % C rri Crest Pefrovrtsky Ridg_ od . ` SE o } OP0 J r wS \8 -ST Or Ilia SW 43 ST R0 a SE 180 sT Eementa HC Park'. Ele on ryDo�lre, ioR 6s sR) W BOW r°llerRidge = _ S GARR v, \u, ■o ■ --Y mSE -.- P� /] �� RP��\ x N -- LOke P0'k Loke Yotingsrroll 5E 18415 �� Lake f BE 184 ST 3 > > �c!�aulevord Sr 00 P S 88 STD a t-tZonePork Mid�TeStff - Cedar Grove Q� Cady SE 188ST — Angle LA M der — — Mee r Q. DR ,N� o` v + + Pork m SE 192 ST 92 ST + 3 +SE 192 ST } 6 +F + + e c po eYoun s �LOke� s W n b O S o 196 IS ST O o o b ' P N T E R cp o O EI enta b 4�"�Q ` o o�N o 09 o R 10 v- N O gb N O ■ of cD eF N 1O > N O 00 (C a cx,sz h h O .o co o O in SE 96GIeTi- W rh co as a 9F, N N ST - - S 200 S$ 120� r-`� eta N S 200 ST A TAC ■Wlementa O �olake a> ry BE 200 ST LOkE SE Pefe�son N 6�0� o a n SE 204 ST of m P N O— E n o� Youngs / W Lake AFT y o, V J V / �:_ Kent -- - 111 `r 7�7t ratory.Q ` A� E High ��'..\`� ST + v' 9oG/T +, fix^ SE 208+ST + ¢xl,isOi + d In+� + oade �, + i� LAKE GS WA rERSHED > 00o tn� Shy .- J- S 212 ST S 212 ST J a`Ather>key ST ■ ElementaryConnencf r a SNP¢ w 5 Q Emerald Par -, ------------ CITY F SEAT E O'Brien 216 q< ST ¢ Q Ele>N1e��Ilj�cree?rb - �T � N �i lone 21e sr Soos reef; �, 'p- I70dOW O N Q ,Pork 0 a I— �, N Elem nt a ___�� C W m K E JN T w s222 ST cSE 222,ST w • \� `-- c�G w Lake MA E " V ry 1 �ffb a \ Ise SE + 224 \+ ST + 66 + + SF Q + +> + o (NorthnjdRr�'ry,. p L , ST 228 QT zs2s8ao \„� orcnor Elegy ntary rldio o ?� --. S� ¢ sezzas ., > ,-...� Park ;Park Orch rd I a 5 Neel Bri n > Pork N SE 232 ST '<se z32 G Wes canyon Ele ant�'y{ ,( \'� N j� > e Pk/- w ■ rn T i'iKenf �' Meridian '� �1 d a a i�,��F, V 900 c aos j „fie or,ai Middle School ' o Nam orrWd P ■ W oke R; > s AZT RGSJ W JAMES ST M E eeR T +Eas Hill _ -+ N.. SE } /r `,' T240 +� i ST + + Loke + C ST+ O m + eo,e ■ N Mork lVer dion > > 0 a N Wildel nes1sPk Russ\N M EKI R r\.� ¢ E m C�Lake t,R;ry, `v ¢ Middeye l_,Cr OOd o °' I...IhC/,�__ O cxl,Ns \ (b G° Rd' �iST z g.> nlel¢ I 0/le�,. Matt onln,�. P o C oJ5 z >S Lela6y l�flc4i 5248 ST ■E �KtS W Y°117at,1� SE 248 STD '�I •L e o�?09 Hir School C/ub i-r Q E entary Lo6o/fCouGkeWl e Course P e, s,■s en Coun r ■ W'lldern ss d Perk t �' Ke Meridian ■ , > C(G/� socC n e� 1 0 P 'n ' �'■East Hill SE Kent Sch. gpistrict wi >! ST Meridian ■ NR,wER pfgRRY o\ -- + S254 Sr +P k{U 900 w+ MAPLE ST o\ ?} + Ad - + + $ O�P� + V S 259 PL �, Woodp r�E /// s' 2s sr a�'.�Cen er Center `'� ■ liehts Lake Lucerne •— T of Lgke h 9i©o ■j�j a SekF ®ran C vington twood - SE a Loke Lake'r Fenwick 's z6z sT ro e Outreach =Ele E ern `k°1i h School 3 Lake s ill 26' a��� g 6E26 dar Valle = Wilde Fenwick �enwlCk a 1> N m R E se zs ST >� p ahi(TOP) �L l�rrd�on q mn ns as Elementaryy a I� ;� P� sEzsrTi sT Q SE2 n IleSm 26 S�OkE Pork(Co.J `� �O nie ■ .. �� N m 4c s 6 Jei Pork Pnrk > EI a Cedar Heights N a w k■ Q g �C STA R SE 272 ST a EI ht SE 272= + Middle School SE � 72 ST d` Q+North �o + + * + 516 + + LAKE y+ G�� s T� 5� SE- 274 ST J'- Merl ion w �� (SE�KENT - KANGLEY a I.IT �`'R'r S 277 III T Green S\ 2 M ��� - rr o■ Pipe Tr _ orizon > SE 276 ST m ow Rid Ri S LAKE w Vffierft ry•I lementa 4 JP� l - }STAR StorLake homes Rid' ntary �z84 sr -- FFl Ro T � $ � ,Elk Pork \CounfyJE za1 s o > _ 1�o", OYin ton Grass Lake Golf Cou YI O/sorL'onyon SE` �� ` a �5 Elementary SE 288 Q N W m \ Pork W -I Berrydale Q s+ +SAwrER _ S 288 ST + 3+ + T + N + + `°' COVI NGZON RD + p + Comeloi Park s 292ST> Meredith 1137 ST Nw= AuburnMuQiclpa'f _ _ '"� QQS) Crest X GOIf .-- �!SE292 ST Airpork w es yer a course .-- °J' a ! vl GraSS L okE $E 96 ST Park(CoJ W S 296 ST¢ m y p - cr 298 ST ` glI hrlStO her = �� " 'a Kentlake >� �•' N 29 ST'NW 30 T NE ' F' ma ;� --y) �' High School 0 rk 5 'O ¢ BPo k;an -+ !caanf SE 304 ST' + + z+ B + ro + g - ■ m i 00�eL > �� �� 2� AV NE B ! �9� ro PKELake _ �28 ST t + + ! +1 3 �� Park 'a a 2 a SE 312 ST s y 0O Z �p5 �m Sawyer ,o t) "I Lee Hill '� Seoifle lnt�l Wynaco i9 Elementar +�•, Q_ O n `--N NWei pis ST NE o 05 -.._.. �,�^xti5`� Racewa m 9i� � Fsr Or On' ■ Q eke Pork `o m y9P� �-,Auburndale G .T S 316 ST JOO,s 33 ©copyright KROLL MAP COMPANY,INC. This map has been modifi Packet Pg. 214 6.D.g IX - Summary of Changes to June 2022 Capital Facilities Plan E The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect 5 0 since 1993. The primary changes from the June 2022 Plan are summarized here. 0 N a Capacity changes continue to reflect fluctuations in class size ratio and program changes. c Changes in portables ortransitional capacity reflect use, lease or purchase,sale, surplus and/or movement between facilities. E c The District will be moving to a K-5 Elementary and 6-8 Middle School model beginning the E 2023-2024 school year. Capacity has been added at the middle school level by reopening the former Sequoia Junior High (now Canyon Ride Middle School). E as w The district worked with Educational Data Solutions, LLC to update student generation factors. The updated rates are included in the body of the Plan. The student headcount enrollment forecast is updated annually. All Elementary schools now U_ have Full Day Kindergarten so six-year Kindergarten projections were previously modified to a meet the requirements for Full Day Kindergarten programs at all elementary schools. L) c a. The district expects to receive some State Funding Assistance (formerly called "state matching funds")for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded site and facility need will be reviewed in the future. W as L Q The impact fees for 2024 calendar year will result in no collection of impact fees for both o Single-Family and Multi-Family due to the capacity study completed in Spring 2023. v as r c 0 a� c L V N ti M a+ C N Y I U r t K W C N E t ca Q 34 Packet Pg. 215 6.D.g X - Appendices E Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors Include: �a 0 Grade Increase/ N ITEM FROM TO Comments /Type Decrease Q Student Generation Factor Elem 0.27 0.248 -0.022 c c� Single Family(SF) MS 0.105 0.085 -0.020 c SH 0.075 0.107 0.032 E Total 0.45 0.440 -0.010 Decrease a� E Student Generation Factor Elem 0.082 0.130 0.048 Q Multi-Family(MF) MS 0.035 0.049 0.014 m SH 0.029 0.056 0.027 E Total 0.146 0.235 0.089 Increase w a� State Funding Assistance Ratios("State Match") 52.49% 51.86% -0.63% Per OSPI Website M LL Area Cost Allowance $242.26 $246.83 4.570 Per OSPI Website Link r Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SF $574,784 $653,485 78,701 Per King County AV-Average of Condominiums&Apts. MF $360,790 $220,293 (140,497) Per King county U c �a d Debt Service Capital Levy Rate/$1000 $0.93 $1.02 $0.09 Per King Co.Assessor Report m c a� General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 2.45% 3.58% 1.13% Bond Buyers 20 year GO Index d L Q E 0 Impact Fee-Single Family SF $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 No Change U a� t r Impact Fee-Multi-Family MF $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 No Change 0 a� c L V N ti M C Y I U r t K W C E t ca Q 35 Packet Pg. 216 6.D.h a� r School District Capital Facilities Plans 0 General Statistics a c School District: Kent Federal Way Auburn r Student Generation Rates c Elementary .248( ) 0.1705 ( ) 0.303( ) E a Middle .085( ) 0.0682( ) 0.133( ) a, Senior High .107( ) 0.0958 ( ) 0.151( ) E c a� cn w E Elementary .130( ) 0.7104 ( ) 0.440( ) �i Middle .049( ) 0.3665( ) 0.150( ) Senior High .056( ) 0.3665( ) 0.172( ) a v c Enrollment 2022-2023 24,482( ) 20,568( ) 17,059( ) a as .y C N L d L Q E 0 U m t c 0 a� c L V Q. N ti M d H N V N r R r U) R L V E V yr a Packet Pg. 217 6.E KENT WASH IN G T O N DATE: October 17, 2023 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Public Hearing on Kent City Code Amendments for School Impact Fees and Fire Impact Fees MOTION: I move to close the public hearing. SUMMARY: This is the public hearing to amend school and fire impact fee sections of Kent City Code. Below is a summary of the substantive changes: • KCC 12.13.040: Adds language to school impact fee exemptions section; the first accessory dwelling unit (ADU) under KCC.15.08.350 is considered part of the single-family use associated with this fee. Subsequent (second) ADU permits shall be charged 50% of the single-family unit impact fee. This change is for consistency with Ordinance No. 4464, which revised ADU regulations and updated impact fees for consistency with new state legislation (HB 1337). • KCC 12.13.130: Allows the use of school impact fees to recoup costs for system improvements incurred to the extent that new growth and development will be served by the previously constructed improvements. Impact fees may be utilized to pay debt service on bonds or similar debt instruments provided that the system improvements are consistent with the requirements of this chapter and are used to serve the new development. • KCC 12.13.160: Adjusts the school district base fee schedule to reflect the updated school capital facilities plans. • KCC 12.13.170: Uses the Engineering News-Record Seattle Area Construction Cost Index values to amend the maximum allowable school impact fees for 2024. • KCC 12.15.040: Adds language to fire impact fees exemptions section; the first accessory dwelling unit (ADU) under KCC.15.08.350 is considered part of the single-family use associated with this fee. Subsequent (second) ADU permits shall be charged 50% of the single-family unit impact fee. This change is for consistency with Ordinance No. 4464, which revised ADU regulations and updated impact fees for consistency with new state legislation (HB 1337). Packet Pg. 218 6.E • KCC 12.15.130 (New Section): Adds a new section to the Kent City Code, entitled "Base fee schedule," which reflects the updated Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). BUDGET IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1. DRAFT KCC Imp Fees Amend Ord (PDF) 2. School Impact Fees History 2005-Present (PDF) Packet Pg. 219 6.E.a r Q. E aD L_ U- U- ORDINANCE NO. a E 6 0 AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the cn City of Kent, Washington, amending Sections .° 12.13.040, 12.13.130, 12.13.160, and 12.13.170, and adding new section 12.15.130 of the Kent City a Code to adjust the school and fire impact fee schedules. E a aD 0 RECITALS U r U A. The City of Kent has adopted a fire and school impact fee Y program as authorized by the State Growth Management Act (GMA) and o RCW 82.02.050 and RCW 82.02.060. Impact fees may be collected and c CU spent only for the public facilities which are addressed by the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. .2 B. In order to collect fire impact fees to be spent by the Puget a Sound Regional Fire Authority (RFA), the City must adopt the RFA's Capital M Improvement Plan into the City's Capital Facilities Plan Element. L C. In order to collect school impact fees to be spent by the school 0 c districts, the City must adopt the schools' Capital Facilities Plans into the E City's Capital Facilities Plan Element. y aD D. Chapters 12.13 and 12.15 of the Kent City Code (KCC) require Ui a that plans be submitted to the City of Kent on an annual basis for City E U Council review, and that this review must occur in conjunction with any Y update of the Capital Facilities Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. a The City Council has reviewed the Capital Facilities Plans submitted by the o r c 1 Kent City Code Amendment E School and Fire Impact Fees U a Packet Pg. 220 6.E.a r Q. school districts and the Capital Improvement Plan submitted by the Puget E aD L Sound Regional Fire Authority. i- E. The Kent, Federal Way, Highline, and Auburn School Districts have requested amendments to the text of Kent City Code to reflect r proposed changes to impact fees. a F. The Kent School District has requested an amendment to the E 6 text of the Kent City Code to allow impact fees to be imposed on and used 0 for previously incurred system improvement costs made for the benefit of U' L new growth and development, all as consistent with RCW 82.02.060(9). G. On May 16, 2023, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 4464, E relating to the regulation of accessory dwelling units. This ordinance E amended transportation and parks impact fees for consistency with new a aD state laws and to incentivize construction of accessory dwelling units. 0 U H. This ordinance amends fire and school district impact fees to align with Ordinance No. 4464. Y I. On September 22, 2023, the City provided the required 60-day o notification under RCW 36.70A.106 to the State of Washington of the City's c CU proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan and Chapter 12.13 of the KCC. The 60-day notice period passed on .2 November 21, 2023. 04 a J. After a public hearing before the City Council on October 17, M 2023, the City Council on November 21, 2023, approved Comprehensive L Plan Amendments to include: (1) the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, 0 c Federal Way, Auburn, and Highline School Districts, and (2) the Capital Improvement Plan for Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority. y a� K. In order to implement the plans referenced above, it is Ui a necessary to amend the impact fee sections of KCC. E U U Y NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: o r c 2 Kent City Code Amendment E School and Fire Impact Fees a Packet Pg. 221 6.E.a r R Q. E a� L ORDINANCE U_ c SECTION 1. - Amendment. Section 12.13.040 of the Kent City as Code, entitled "Exemptions", is hereby amended as follows: U_ a Sec. 12.13.040. Exemptions. E 6 A. The following development activities are exempt from the 0 requirements of this chapter: q 1. Low-income housing as follows: a. Low-income housing projects that are constructed by E public housing agencies or private nonprofit housing developments. E b. Low-income residential units, rented or purchased, that Q a� are dedicated and constructed by private developers. 0 U 2. Shelters or dwelling units for temporary placement, which r provide housing to persons on a temporary basis for not more than two (2) Y weeks. o 3. Construction or remodeling of transitional housing facilities or c •L dwelling units that provide housing to persons on a temporary basis for not more than twenty-four (24) months, in connection with job training, self- .2 sufficiency training and human services counseling, the purpose of which is a. to help persons make the transition from homelessness to placement in M permanent housing. L 4. Any form of housing for the elderly, including nursing homes, 0 retirement centers, and any type of housing units for persons age fifty-five (55) and over, which have recorded covenants or recorded declaration of y a� restrictions precluding school-aged children as residents in those units. LL a 5. Rebuilding of legally established dwelling unit(s) destroyed or E U damaged by fire, flood, explosion, act of God or other accident or Y catastrophe, or remodeling of existing legally established dwelling unit(s), ~ Q provided that such rebuilding takes place within a period of one (1) year o c 3 Kent City Code Amendment E School and Fire Impact Fees c� r Q Packet Pg. 222 6.E.a r R Q. after destruction, and so long as no additional dwelling units are created. E a� L 6. Condominium projects in which existing dwelling units are i_ converted into condominium ownership and where no new dwelling units are created. a� U_ 7. Any development activity that is exempt from the payment of a an impact fee pursuant to RCW 82.02.100, due to mitigation of the same E 6 system improvement under the State Environmental Policy Act. 0 8. Any development activity for which school impacts have been `2 q mitigated pursuant to a condition of plat or PUD approval to pay fees, dedicate land or construct or improve school facilities, unless the condition E of the plat or PUD approval provides otherwise: provided that the condition E of the plat or PUD approval predates the effective date of fee imposition. Q a� 9. Any development activity for which school impacts have been 0 U mitigated pursuant to a voluntary agreement entered into with the district r to pay fees, dedicate land or construct or improve school facilities, unless Y the terms of the voluntary agreement provide otherwise provided that the o agreement predates the effective date of fee imposition. c •L 10. Construction of an accessory residential structure, including the first accessory dwelling unit (ADU) under KCC 15.08.350, as it is considered .2 part of the single-family use associated with this fee. Subsequent ADU a permits shall be charged 50% of the single-family unit impact fee. M L B. For purposes of this section, a low-income housing project unit or a 0 low-income residential rental unit is one that has a maximum rent and a maximum income level for tenants equal to or less than fifty (50) percent y a� of the countywide median household income, adjusted for household size. LL a A low-income residential purchased unit is one that has a sales price of one E U hundred thirty thousand dollars ($130,000) or less for single-family houses, Y and ninety-five thousand dollars ~y- ($95,000) or less for multifamily units. a These maximum sale prices shall be adjusted by the Seattle CPI-U consumer o c 4 Kent City Code Amendment E School and Fire Impact Fees c� r Q Packet Pg. 223 6.E.a r Q. price index each year, with 1992 being the base year. The purchaser's family E aD L income cannot exceed eighty (80) percent of the countywide median iI household income, adjusted for household size. a� (D U_ r C. When a low-income purchased unit has received a building permit, a the director of the finance department shall record a notice of the exemption E 6 and the income qualification requirements for such unit with the King County 0 auditor. U) 0 c D. When a low-income purchased unit is sold or rented to a person who E does not qualify as a low-income purchaser or tenant, an amount equal to E the impact fee on the date of the sale or rental shall be paid by the seller or a aD the property owner to the city. 0 U A r U E. The director of the planning department shall review requests for Y exemptions from impact fees under subsection (A) of this section pursuant o to criteria and procedures adopted by administrative rule, and shall advise CU the developer in writing of the granted or denial of the request. In addition, the director shall notify the school district of all applications for exemption .2 when they are received and shall notify the school district when such a requests are granted or denied. M L F. Impact fees for low-income housing and other development activities 0 c with broad public purposes pursuant to RCW 82.02.060(2) shall be paid E from public funds. The impact fees for these units shall be considered paid y aD for by the school district through its other funding sources, without the Ui a district actually transferring funds from its other funding sources into the E U impact fee account. Y a_ Q SECTION 2, - Amendment. Section 12.13.130 of the Kent City o r c 5 Kent City Code Amendment E School and Fire Impact Fees U 0 a Packet Pg. 224 6.E.a r R Q. Code, entitled "Impact fee accounts and refunds", is hereby amended as E a� L follows: i_ c Sec. 12.13.130. Impact fee accounts and refunds. A. Impact fee receipts shall be earmarked specifically and retained in a a special interest-bearing account established by the district solely for the E 6 district's school impact fees. All interest shall be retained in the account and 0 expended for the purpose or purposes for which impact fees were imposed. `" L q Annually, the district, based in part on its report prepared pursuant to KCC 12.13.060, shall prepare a report on the impact fee account showing the E source and amount of all monies collected, earned, or received, and capital E or system improvements that were financed in whole or in part by impact Q a� fees. The district shall submit a copy of this report to the city council. The 0 U city shall maintain separate school impact fee and administration fee r accounts pursuant to KCC 12.13.110, and shall prepare a report on the Y source, and amount of all school impact fees collected and transferred to 0 the district. c •L a� x B. Impact fees for the district's system improvements shall be expended .2 by the district only in conformance with the capital facilities plan element of a the comprehensive plan. Subject to the foregoing, impact fees may be used M to recoup costs for system improvements previously incurred to the extent L that new growth and development will be served by the previously o constructed system improvements. In the event that bonds or similar debt instruments are or have been issued for the advanced provision of system y a� improvements, impact fees may be used to pay debt service on such bonds LL 0- or similar debt instruments to the extent that system improvements E U provided are consistent with the requirements of this chapter and are used Y to serve the new development. ~ W 0 c 6 Kent City Code Amendment E School and Fire Impact Fees c� r Q Packet Pg. 225 6.E.a r R Q. C. Impact fees shall be expended or encumbered by the district for a E a� L permissible use within six (6) years of receipt by the district, unless there i- exists an extraordinary or compelling reason for fees to be held longer than six (6) years. Such extraordinary or compelling reasons shall be identified to the city by the district in a written report. The city council shall identify a the district's extraordinary and compelling reasons for the fees to be held E 6 longer than six (6) years in the council's own written findings. 0 L q D. The current owner of property on which an impact fee has been paid may receive a refund of such fees if the impact fees have not been expended E or encumbered within six (6) years of receipt of the funds by the district on E school facilities intended to benefit the development activity for which the Q a� impact fees were paid. In determining whether impact fees have been 0 U encumbered, impact fees shall be considered encumbered on a first in, first r V out basis. The district shall notify potential claimants by first class mail C Y deposited with the United States postal service addressed to the owner of o the property as shown in the county tax records. c •L �a a� x E. An owner's request for a refund must be submitted to the district in .2 writing within one (1) year of the date the right to claim the refund arises a or the date that notice is given, whichever date is later. Any impact fees M that are not expended or encumbered by the district in conformance with L the capital facilities plan within these time limitations, and for which no 0 application for a refund has been made within this one (1) year period, shall be retained and expended consistent with the provisions of this section. y a� Refunds of impact fees shall include any interest earned on the impact fees. LL a E U F. Should the city seek to terminate any or all school impact fee Y requirements, all unexpended or unencumbered funds, including interest ~ Q earned, shall be refunded to the current owner of the property for which a o c 7 Kent City Code Amendment E School and Fire Impact Fees c� r Q Packet Pg. 226 6.E.a r Q. school impact fee was paid. Upon the finding that any or all fee requirements E aD L are to be terminated, the city shall place notice of such termination and the i- availability of the refunds in a newspaper of general circulation at least two (2) times and shall notify all potential claimants by first class mail addressed �i r to the owner of the property as shown in the county tax records. All funds a available for refund shall be retained for a period of one (1) year. At the end E 0 of one (1) year, any remaining funds shall be retained by the district, but 0 must be expended by the district, consistent with the provisions of this U) 0 section. The notice requirement set forth above shall not apply if there are no unexpended or unencumbered balances with the account or accounts E being terminated. E a aD G. A developer may request and shall receive a refund, including interest 0 U earned on the impact fees, when: r U 1. The developer does not proceed to finalize the development Y activity as required by statute or city code including the International o Building Code, the International Residential Code, or other applicable c CU building codes, as adopted and amended in Ch. 14.01 KCC; and 2. No impact on the district has resulted. "Impact" shall be .2 deemed to include cases where the district has expended or encumbered a the impact fees in good faith prior to the application for a refund. In the M event that the district has expended or encumbered the fees in good faith, L no refund shall be forthcoming. However, if within a period of three (3) 0 c years, the same or subsequent owner of the property proceeds with the E same or substantially similar development activity, the owner shall be y aD eligible for a credit. The owner must petition the district and provide receipts Ui a of impact fees paid by the owner for a development of the same or E U substantially similar nature on the same property or some portion thereof. Y The district shall determine whether to grant a credit, and such ~ Q determinations may be appealed by following the procedures set forth in o r c 8 Kent City Code Amendment E School and Fire Impact Fees 0 0 a Packet Pg. 227 6.E.a r R Q. KCC 12.13.120 above. E as L_ U_ H. Interest due upon the refund of impact fees required by this section shall be calculated according to the average amount received by the district on invested funds throughout the period during which the fees were a retained. E 0 0 SECTION 3. - Amendment. Section 12.13.160 of the Kent City `2 0 Code, entitled "Base fee schedule", is hereby amended as follows: a� E Sec. 12.13.160. Base fee schedule. The following fee shall be a� assessed for the indicated types of development: E a� 0 U School Single-Family Multifamily Multifamily r District Studio Y Kent, $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 No. 415 •L �a Federal $0.00 $9.99 $6,998.00 $0.00 = Way, No. .2 210 a. Auburn ^�Q N $ $5,957.02 $ 9,913.00 $0.00 � No. 408 L Highline, $0 $0 $0.00 No. 401 a N N SECTION 4. - Amendment. Section 12.13.170 of the Kent City U_ 0- Code, entitled "Maximum allowable fees", is hereby amended as follows: E U U Sec. 12.13.170. Maximum allowable fees. School impact fees provided by this chapter shall be assessed based on the calculation set forth 0 c 9 Kent City Code Amendment E School and Fire Impact Fees c� r Q Packet Pg. 228 6.E.a r Q. in KCC 12.13.140, unless they exceed a maximum allowable fee as set forth E aD L in this section. There shall be an increase in the maximum allowable fee iI each year by the same percentage as the percentage change in the previous calendar year's average monthly Engineering News Record (ENR) Seattle �i r Area Construction Cost Index values, relative to the corresponding average a monthly ENR Construction Cost Index values for the preceding year, as E 6 calculated from August 1st through July 31st. 0 L The maximum allowable fee is set at $10,446 $10,759 for single-family dwelling units and a maximum of $1 98 $11,637 for multifamily dwelling E units for 20232024. E a aD SECTION 5. - Amendment. Section 12.15.040 of the Kent City 0 Code, entitled "Exemptions", is hereby amended as follows: r c Sec. 12.15.040. Exemptions. Y c A. The following development activities are exempt from the 0, c requirements of this chapter: CU 1. Shelters or dwelling units for temporary placement, which provide housing to persons on a temporary basis not exceeding two weeks; a 2. Rebuilding or remodeling of a legally established structure M ti destroyed or damaged by fire, flood, explosion, act of nature or other accident or catastrophe; provided, that a building permit for the rebuilding p a or remodeling is issued within one year after the damage or destruction a occurs. The exemption shall not apply to any additional structure or Q N expansion of the original square footage that is proposed to be built on the a same tax parcel on which the structure that was damaged or destroyed is E being rebuilt or remodeled; Y 3. Projects in which existing dwelling units are converted into condominium ownership and where no new dwelling units are created; o r c 10 Kent City Code Amendment E School and Fire Impact Fees U a Packet Pg. 229 6.E.a r Q. 4. Any development activity that is exempt from the payment of E aD L an impact fee pursuant to RCW 82.02.100(1), as amended; iI 5. Any development activity for which fire impacts have been mitigated pursuant to a voluntary agreement entered into with the RFA to �i r pay fees, dedicate land or construct or improve fire protection facilities; a provided, that the agreement predates the effective date of fee imposition; E 6 6. Any development of 200 square feet or less that does not use 0 or store hazardous materials that would create a life safety risk; U) 0 7. Alteration of an existing nonresidential structure that does not expand the useable space and that does not involve a change in use; E 8. Demolition of or moving an existing structure within the city E from one site to another; a aD 9. Miscellaneous improvements that do not create additional 0 U demands and need for fire protection facilities, including, but not limited to, construction of accessory structures, as defined in KCC 15.02.005, fences, Y walls, swimming pools and signs; o 10. Alteration, expansion or remodeling of an existing dwelling or c L accessory residential structure where the use is not changed; 11. Construction of an accessory dwelling unit en a paFeel with arf .2 existing single family dwelling uniti provided, hewever, that this shall Only a N M fee that weuld otherwise ti M ;residential structure including the first L accessory dwelling unit (ADU) under 15.08.350, as it is considered part of 0 c the single-family use associated with this fee. Subsequent ADU permits shall E be charged 50% of the single-family unit impact fee; and y aD 12. A development permit for a city project. Ui a E U B. Pursuant to RCW 82.02.100(2), where automatic fire sprinklers are Y installed in single-family residential occupancies, a reduced fee equal to 70 Q percent of the impact fee shall serve to mitigate the costs of needed EMS o r c 11 Kent City Code Amendment E School and Fire Impact Fees 0 0 a Packet Pg. 230 6.E.a r Q. and rescue resources. E aD L_ U_ C. The director shall be authorized to determine whether a particular development activity falls within an exemption identified in this chapter, or �i r is exempt pursuant to other applicable law. Determinations of the director a shall be subject to the appeals procedures set forth in KCC 12.15.110. E 6 0 SECTION 6. - New Section. A new Section 12.15.130 of the Kent U) 0 City Code, entitled "Base fee schedule", is hereby enacted as follows: aD E Sec. 12.15.130. Base fee schedule. The following fee shall be a� assessed for the indicated types of development: E aD 0 U Land Use Type Impact Fee r Single Family $1,713.96 per unit c a� Multi-Family $2,279.89 per unit Y c 0 Commercial Industrial $2.14 per square foot Assisted Care $2.06 per square foot x Hospital 2 Medical Facility a Education $0.61 per square foot M ti Assembly $1.15 per square foot L Other Facilities $1.85 per square foot 0 Common Space E Q N SECTION 7. - Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon Ui 0- approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are E U authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the Y correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering; or Q references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations. o r c 12 Kent City Code Amendment E School and Fire Impact Fees a Packet Pg. 231 6.E.a r Q. E SECTION S. - Severability. If any one or more section, subsection, i- or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, that decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance U- and the same shall remain in full force and effect. a E SECTION 9. - Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be 0 0 in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law. cn L O E DANA RALPH, MAYOR Date Approved E a a� 0 ATTEST: r U r c a� Y KIMBERLEY A. KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted o a� c L Date Published a x APPROVED AS TO FORM: a N M ti M TAMMY WHITE, CITY ATTORNEY p c aD E Q N d LL Q E U U Y H U- Q r c 13 Kent City Code Amendment E School and Fire Impact Fees U a Packet Pg. 232 6.E.b School Impact Fees History 2005 - Present 0 Single-Family Multifamily Kent* Federal Way Auburn 7 Kent Federal Way Auburn c� 2024 $0 $0 $5,957.02 2024 $0 $6,998.00 $9,913 a� 2023 $0 $0 $7,963 2023 $0 $0 $9,913 Y c 2022 $5,818 $1,845 $3,652 2022 $2,458 $9,450 $8,938 0 2021 $5,693 $3,243 $6,456 2021 $2,405 $16,003 $16,326 L 2020 $5,554 $5,035 $6,905 2020 $2,345 $20,768 $14,667 2019 $5,397 $7,221 $5,716 2019 $2,279 $19,454 $4,488 2018 $5,235 $6,842 $3,322 2018 $2,267 $20,086 $2,081 2017 $5,100 $3,198 $5,469 2017 $2,210 $8,386 $1,640 a 2016 $4,990 $2,899 $5,331 2016 $2,163 $506 $2,625 M 2015 $5,486 $5,171 $4,137 2015 $3,378 $1,834 $3,518 M 2014 $5,486 $5,363 $5,399 2014 $3,378 $1,924 $3,388 2013 $5,486 $4,014 $5,512 2013 $3,378 $1,381 $3,380 a 2012 $5,486 $4,014 $5,557 2012 $3,378 $1,253 $2,305 2011 $5,486 $4,014 $5,266 2011 $3,378 $2,172 $1,518 2010 $5,394 $3,832 $5,433 2010 $3,322 $2,114 $1,185 N 2009 $5,304 $4,017 $5,375 2009 $3,266 $1,733 $877 �% 2008 $5,110 $3,883 $5,361 2008 $3,146 $1,647 $466 2007 $4,928 $3,018 $5,657 2007 $3,034 $856 $1,228 x 2006 $4,775 $3,393 $5,681 2006 $2,940 $895 $1,536 a 2005 $4,056 $2,868 $5,297 2005 $1,762 $905 $1,832 a_ CU Note: The maximum allowable fee this year is set at $10,759 for single-family dwelling units and a maximum of E $11,637 for multifamily dwelling units. This number is updated annually to match the change in construction cost 0 index in the Seattle area (which was 2.0% this year). 0 Cn aD E 0 r r Q Packet Pg. 233 8.A.1 Pending Approval City Council Workshop • Workshop Regular Meeting KENT Minutes WAS HINGT0N October 3, 2023 Date: October 3, 2023 Time: 5:15 p.m. Place: Chambers I. CALL TO ORDER Attendee Name Title Status Arrived as Bill Boyce Council President Present Brenda Fincher Councilmember Present Satwinder Kaur Councilmember Present o Marli Larimer Councilmember Present Zandria Michaud Councilmember Present ° Toni Troutner Councilmember Present a Les Thomas Councilmember Present Dana Ralph Mayor Present a Ln T II. PRESENTATIONS M A 2024 Mid Biennium Budget Paula Painter 75 MIN. o N M Finance Director, Paula Painter kicked-off the workshop to provide responses o to 2024 mid-biennium budget questions submitted by the councilmembers. c as Painter provided the list of questions #1-#29 to the Council and provided responses as follows: a� Q#1. Reference is made to a $1M transfer to ARPA TBD project, but I don't c see this in the ARPA summary page on page 126? cc Answer: Removes a transfer that was budgeted in 2023 that is not going to happen. Painter provided additional details. a a� Q#2 and #12. What do we do with the $150k marked for Voter Registration? Answer: Not an increase. This is budgeted in anticipation of costs associated with a possible public safety levy. Q#4. Using only $1M of fund balance (instead of $3.1M) due to higher revenues, does that mean we have a $2.M excess? Answer: The City has less of a structural imbalance for 2024. See Page 105, various other pages and Mayor's message. Painter walked through how the City has reduced its reliance on fund balance. Q#6. What is the $445 changes to lifecycle expenses intended for? Answer: accessoShoWare Center - In 2023, there were budgeted projects Packet Pg. 234 8.A.1 City Council Workshop Workshop Regular October 3, 2023 Meeting Kent, Washington Minutes ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._............................................................................................................................................................................................................... that were put on hold due to other emergency repairs. The City is now rebudgeting those project for 2024. Q#13. Can we get a breakdown of the "red-light camera fund" like we do for the funds in the budget book? Answer: Red Light Camera revenues and expenses are included in the Criminal Justice Fund. Painter reviewed revenues and expenditures related to the red light cameras and advised new cameras are coming online. Q#14. What will happen to the ongoing positions currently funded by ARPA? r Answer: When no longer funded by ARPA, they will be funded by the General Fund. 4- 0 Q#15. There will be a lot of money left from ARPA after 2024. Will the o remainder be used in 2025? a Answer: All $28M needs to be obligated by the end of 2024. The City has Q until the end of 2026 to expend the funds. a LO Q#28. Is there a plan to update the finance software so that utility customers can set up autopay online? `O M Answer: A kickoff meeting was held last week to begin the process of o replacing our current utility billing system. Auto-pay online and paperlesscli N billing are a priority for this project. 0 Q#29. Is there a plan to update software so that customers can pay permit fees online? w Answer: Economic and Community Development Director, Kurt Hanson responded as follows: Currently, all permits within the Amanda system can be paid online with credit cards and by the end of this month with eChecks (lower cost for customers). All of the City's residential permits, over-the- counter permits and other remedial permit types are in the Amanda System. Permit types still in the old KIVA System can be paid by credit card over the N phone to our Customer Service Division in Finance (or in person via checks or credit cards). Q#5 part 1. How does Parks and Police spending qualify under the Affordable Housing Tax? What operating expenditures are being funded? Q#27 - What are the Affordable Housing Operational Expenses for PD. $1,098,380? Answer: Chief Padilla responded as follows: HB 1590 specifies that sale tax can be used towards affordable housing and mental health services - Kent uses funds to support its Co-Responder model, expenses for the City's contract with PSRFA and sergeant staffing. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Page 2 of 6 Packet Pg. 235 8.A.1 City Council Workshop Workshop Regular October 3, 2023 Meeting Kent, Washington Minutes ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._............................................................................................................................................................................................................... Q#5 part 2. Where is SKHHP funding show? Answer: On page 122 you can see the 2024 anticipated transfer out to the project holding SKHHP funding. Parks Director, Julie Parascondola provided details on the use of 1590 funds. Q#10. Please remind me of our drone and cameras policies. Is it true that we capture license plates and accident scenes, but we do not capture faces? Answer: Chief Padilla advised the City's Drone policy and state law prohibited the City from capturing those images. N r Q#19. Capital Additions - Canterbury Park Improvements are removed from the budget. Why? Answer: Parascondola advised it is not identified as a high priority project in o the 2022 Parks and Open Space Plan, therefore funding for this project is ; being moved out to 2026 to create space for higher-priority projects in the Q near-term. Q Q#20. KVLT Old Fishing Hole improvements project is removed from the a budget. Why has it been removed? LO Answer: Parascondola advised it is identified as a mid-term project in the LO 2022 P&OS Plan and is currently planned for project initiation later in the 6- o year planning cycle. This project has been delayed to create space for highercli N priority projects in the near-term. Additionally, the department is looking for long-term solutions to ongoing issues along Frager Rd before significant o investments are made here. o a� w Q#21. Why is the budget reduced by $250,000 for Mill Creek Canyon/Earthworks Park Improvements? Answer: Parascondola advised it's a timing issue. Funding for Mill Creek Canyon and Earthworks Park Phase 1 Improvements was reduced by $250K as part of a realignment of near-term funding for ongoing projects that need additional funding for design and construction. Examples of these projects a include (but are not limited to): Uplands Splash Park, Campus Park, North Cn Meridian Park. This funding is not needed at Mill Creek Canyon imminently and will be added back to the budget for Mill Creek Canyon in future funding years. Q#22. Some mid-term parks projects, as defined in the Parks and Open Space Plan, are not included in this list, projects like West Hill Neighborhood community Park and East Hill North Neighborhood Park aka Matinjussi Property. Why is that? Answer: Parascondola advised Parks Planning and Development has reached capacity for creation of new projects due to limited staffing resources. The updated 6-year capital plan includes funding for projects identified as mid- term, including the East Hill North Neighborhood Park Development project ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Page 3 of 6 Packet Pg. 236 8.A.1 City Council Workshop Workshop Regular October 3, 2023 Meeting Kent, Washington Minutes ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._............................................................................................................................................................................................................... (aka Matinjussi property). West Hill will be considered for funding in future 6- year capital cycles as staffing resources allowed. Q#23. How will KBAC use the organization development funds of $47,850? Answer: These are part of the $1,750,000 Building Resiliency funding that Human Services received as part of ARPA. This funding was "awarded" as part of the 2023 application process. This contract is effective 1/1/2024. The funds awarded to KBAC will be used to develop new programs and expand on existing one, hire additional staff, purchase necessary equipment and supplies, invest in CBO trainings and development workshops, increase their r outreach and awareness via more marketing materials and media campaigns, hosting more social and networking events, and attend more education 4- workshops and/or conferences. ° Q#24. Why is Access Control Budget removed? Q Answer: The "access control" budget was reduced due to a new budget Q request for $200K for Security Camera updates. Please see page 93 for the 6-year update that includes $10K per year starting in 2025. We did not needLO a the funding in 2024 because we are performing all the actual updates as a capital project. We have an already established $500K project within the M Facilities Internal Service Fund for access control but needed an additional o $200K for expanded access control and security cameras. N M r Q#25. What is the 2024 Police Department Facility Upgrade? o Answer: The Police Department Facility Upgrade is for Fire Station 74 Improvements, which includes: w • Replace the flooring up at the training center. offices and classrooms • Replace podiums in both classrooms and update the audio visual equipment • Men's and Women's bathroom upgrades (these restrooms include showers) The "kitchen equipment upgrade" is related to non-City Hall facilities such as Senior Center, Riverbend (Half Lion) and Corrections, which includes (where applicable): • Corrections convection ovens, oven / range, laundry equipment N • Senior Center ice machine, deep fryer • Riverbend/Half Lion freezer (the City owns the infrastructure, Half Lion leases to use) • Misc. older equipment that fails each year like the garbage disposals, coffee machine, mixers, steam kettles. Q#26. CIP Projects - Why is there no funding listed for KEHOC beyond 2024? Answer: City Council Allocated $24.5 Million in the 2023-2024 Adopted Budget to advance KEHOC Design and Phase Construction. As we got deeper in design, we realized there were a lot of efficiencies and needs that warranted a larger facility, which were presented to City Council on May 16, 2023, where staff received verbal authorization of funding up to $50 million, ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Page 4 of 6 Packet Pg. 237 8.A.1 City Council Workshop Workshop Regular October 3, 2023 Meeting Kent, Washington Minutes ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._............................................................................................................................................................................................................... utilizing bond or other funding, as presented. We have just recently finalized the design and received the cost estimate and are now beginning meetings with Finance to begin funding strategy discussions and will be bringing recommendations to Council soon. Once/if Council approves the full funding approach for KEHOC, the full budget will be modified accordingly, at that time. Q#3. There is $250k for hazardous tree removal from ARPA funds. Does this include replacement of trees? Answer: Parascondola advised the $250K for Hazardous Tree Removal is Park a Operations and specifically for Park trees, not street trees, which is noted on page 127. As part of the information gathered while developing the Park 4- Urban Forestry Plan development, a tree assessment and inventory was 0 completed, and 441 trees of concern/risk have been identified in the current ; tree inventory to be addressed over a 20-year span. The annual removal plan Q will be evaluated annually with updated tree assessment/evaluation Q information as it is developed. The ARPA funding received will help Parks address around 110 +/- trees or roughly 1/4 and will be completed by the end a of 2026. Parks recently hired it's new Urban Forester in June, 2023 and are LO now beginning to advance Urban Forestry goals, including tree removals, per LO plan. o N cli N Q#3. Funding for new maintenance positions are coming from the Street Tree Program and contractor services. Please provide more information o regarding the Street Tree program. How it is funded and what we do with the o budget. w Answer: Public Works Director, Chad Bieren advised the program is funded at roughly $300K/year out of the street fund to remove and replace street trees. c Bieren advised the James Street trees were removed and replaced with the current landscaping after an extensive public process. Residents opted for a landscaping rather than street trees. Cn a� Q#8 and #11. Are the 5 Ford Escape/Bronco Sport vehicles slated for replacement hybrid, electric or gas fueled? Answer: Bieren talked about the City's intent to purchase more of an electrified fleet, but there are barriers, such as installing charging stations. Once KEHOC is done, the City will purchase more hybrids. There are supply chain issues with electric vehicles that further limit purchases. Q#16. Drainage Capital - GRNRA Pump Station North is removed from the budget while the Mill Creek Rehabilitation budget is increased. Why is that? Answer: Bieren advised the funds were moved into the Mill Creek rehabilitation project because the City may get a permit faster for the ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Page 5 of 6 Packet Pg. 238 8.A.1 City Council Workshop Workshop Regular October 3, 2023 Meeting Kent, Washington Minutes ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._............................................................................................................................................................................................................... reestablishment for Mill Creek. Q#17. What does the GRNRA security and maintenance project entail? Answer: Bieren advised pumps, catwalks and control equipment will be updated/installed in addition to securing the area to protect against vandalism. Q#18. Why are the following Water Fund Capital Projects no longer funded? 228t" - Central-88t" Waterline SR 516 Covington/Way-CSTM & KSTM Were the funds reallocated to other projects? 'c Bieren advised the transmission main - 228t" project will take a lot of 0 pavement rehabilitation and the City has decided it's more efficient to time c the project with the overlay. a a a SR 516 - This is a City of Covington project and their timeframe has been extended. a Ln T Painter walked the Council through the budget meeting timeline up through LO adoption on November 21, 2023. o N M Meeting ended at 6:13 p.m. o U , 0 Ki4�ley A. Kot otcr � City Clerk a� c Q. a� a a� c ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Page 6 of 6 Packet Pg. 239 8.A.2 Pending Approval Kent City Council • City Council Regular Meeting KENT Minutes WAS HINGT0N October 3, 2023 Date: October 3, 2023 Time: 7:00 p.m. Place: Chambers 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE Mayor Ralph called the meeting to order. c 2. ROLL CALL Attendee Name AMT Status Arrived o Dana Ralph mayor Present Bill Boyce Council President Present ° Brenda Fincher Councilmember Present a Satwinder Kaur Councilmember Present Marli Larimer Councilmember PresentCD a Toni Troutner Councilmember Present Les Thomas Councilmember Present M Zandria Michaud Councilmember Present N M 3. AGENDA APPROVAL A. I move to approve the agenda as amended. o Chief Administrative Officer, Pat Fitzpatrick added Other Business item "9.A W Resolution relating to the utilization of opioid funds - adopt" RESULT: MOTION PASSES [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Bill Boyce, Council President Q. SECONDER: Les Thomas, Councilmember AYES: Boyce, Fincher, Kaur, Larimer, Troutner, Thomas, Michaud a a� 4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A. Public Recognition i. Employee of the Month Mayor Ralph recognized Quentin Palmer as the City's October employee of the month. ii. Proclamation for Domestic Violence Awareness Month Mayor Ralph presented the Proclamation for Domestic Violence Awareness Month to Jenn Gladish, Board President at DAWN and Gladish expressed Packet Pg. 240 8.A.2 Kent City Council City Council Regular Meeting October 3, 2023 Minutes Kent, Washington appreciation of the proclamation. iii. Proclamation for National Disability Employment Awareness Month Mayor Ralph presented the Proclamation to Debbie Meyers, staff and supported employees from SKCAC. Meyers expressed appreciation of the proclamation and presented the Mayor with the 2023 Employer Award recognizing the City of Kent for Advancing Access & Equity through Supported Employment. iv. Proclamation for Breast Cancer Awareness Month N Mayor Ralph presented the Proclamation for Breast cancer Awareness Month r to Councilmember Larimer. Councilmember Larimer accepted the proclamation and asked everyone to use this month to spread awareness. 4- 0 V. Recognition of Teachers Trained w/Council Funding- UW Space Program 0 L Economic Development Officer, Bill Ellis recognized staff from the University Q of Washington, Green River College, the Kent School District, and teachers that recently completed the STEM training that was funded by the City a Council. o ti B. Community Events N 0 Council President Boyce advised of upcoming events at the accessoShoWare N Center. "' 0 Councilmember Fincher advised of upcoming Spotlilght Series events, the fall o recycling events and fall clean up event. w Councilmember Michaud advised of the ReLEAF Volunteer Conservation Event on October 7t" at Van Doren's Park and the October 14t" Orca Recovery Day - Volunteer Conservation Event at Riverview Park. a C. Economic and Community Development Report Chief Economic Development Officer, Bill Ellis presented the quarterly N Economic and Community Development Report. Ellis provided details on the value of aerospace business and jobs in Kent and reviewed the King County Economic Overview that details King County's $332 billion economy that is becoming increasingly concentrated in information and service-base sectors. Southern King County is a hub for manufacturing, but the sector is shifting as new space grows and traditional aerospace manufacturing declines. Ellis talked about the impact of aerospace manufacturing in King County and Kent. Manufacturing users in Kent directly generate two-thirds the amount of sales tax revenue as all of the City's retail operations, and three times as much as all of Kent's eatery/hospitality combined. In Kent's industrial area, ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Page 2 of 8 Packet Pg. 241 8.A.2 Kent City Council City Council Regular Meeting October 3, 2023 Minutes Kent, Washington manufacturing provides the highest returns per worker in B&O taxes collected. Income distribution in King County is concentrated in middle- and high- income jobs, with fewer low-income jobs. King county's aerospace sector employment reflects the economy-wide concentration in middle and high- income jobs. The report documents challenges to aerospace - "Site Readiness" and Business Readiness." aD r Ellis provided an update on the Naden site and reviewed milestones and provided an update on industrial development. 4- 0 Ellis talked about the new business programs and indicated small businesses 0 in Kent for the next three years will have access to: a • Tailored Assistance g • Acceleration Programs • Loan Readiness a 0 • Finance Coaching ti • Community N • Network N • Convenient, in-person and online delivery options M r Ellis talked about the Commercial Affordability Grants, who can apply and how to apply. Ellis provided an overview of the timeline that included a community outreach, pre-application through the end of the grant cycle. 3 S. REPORTS FROM COUNCIL AND STAFF a� A. Mayor Ralph's Report Mayor Ralph serves as the Chair of the King County Flood Control Advisory Board that recently presented their advisory letter to the Board of a Supervisors. Their recommendation is to keep looking for funding to continue building out projects. Additionally, making sure the KCFCD continues to stay true to their mission as they build out their budget and fund projects. Mayor Ralph serves on the Puget Sound Regional Council's Executive Board and Operations Committee. The Exeutive Board reviewed the Regional Safety Plan and they received a presentation from the Washington State Ferry System that are facing issues with staffing. B. Chief Administrative Officer's Report Chief Administrative Officer, Pat Fitzpatrick advised his report is in today's agenda packet. C. Councilmembers' Reports ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Page 3 of 8 Packet Pg. 242 8.A.2 Kent City Council City Council Regular Meeting October 3, 2023 Minutes Kent, Washington Council President Boyce serves as the Chair of the Council Workshop and provided a recap to today's agenda item. Councilmember Michaud thanked those that participated in the recent TeamUp2CleanUp event. Michaud serves as the subject matter chair for Parks items on the Committee of the Whole agenda and provided a recap of today's agenda items. Michaud serves on the Regional Law, Safety and Justice Committee that 4 received a presentation from the cities of Burien and Shoreline on their Co- responder programs in addition to receiving a briefing from a student at UW that assessed the youth behavior workforce in King County. 4- 0 Michaud serves on the Washington Community Forestry Council and has 0 been assigned to serve on Washington's Tree Equity Collaborative. The 0. recent meeting had discussion on goals and roles for the Tree Equity Pledge. Q Michaud advised the public can access the Tree Equity Score map online. a 0 Councilmember Kaur serves on the King County Growth Management Planning Board that recently voted on the Urban Growth Area Policies and N the Four-to-One Program. The Board also received a presentation from the N Puget Sound Regional Council for their certificcation of 2021 Countywide M Planning Policies. There was also a presentation on school sitting in urban o growth areas. o Councilmember Troutner serves on the Regional Transit Committee that 3 recently participated in celebrating King County Metro's 50t" birthday celebration. a� c Councilmember Thomas serves as the Chair of the Puget Sound Regional Fire a Authority October 19th @ 5:30 at station 78. a Councilmember Fincher serves as the subject matter chair for the Public Works items on the Committee of the Whole agenda and provided a recap of today's agenda item. Fincher serves on the King Conservation District that recently toured projects. Fincher serves on the Mental Illness and Dependency Council that received a briefing on the Crisis Care Levy. 6. PUBLIC HEARING A. First Public Hearing on the 2024 - 2029 Capital Improvement Program ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Page 4 of 8 Packet Pg. 243 8.A.2 Kent City Council City Council Regular Meeting October 3, 2023 Minutes Kent, Washington Mayor Ralph provided an overview of the public hearing process and opened the public hearing. Finance Director, Paula Painter provided an overview of the 2024 - 2029 Capital Improvement Plan. There was no discussion. There were no persons signed up to provide comment. No written public comments were received. I move to close the public hearing. r c RESULT: MOTION PASSES [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Bill Boyce, Council President o SECONDER: Les Thomas, Councilmember o AYES: Boyce, Fincher, Kaur, Larimer, Troutner, Thomas, Michaud a Q 7. PUBLIC COMMENT a Darryl Jones, a Kent resident provided public comment relating the o homeless. M N O S. CONSENT CALENDAR N M r RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] O MOVER: Bill Boyce, Council President SECONDER: Les Thomas, Councilmember 3 AYES: Boyce, Fincher, Kaur, Larimer, Troutner, Thomas, Michaud a� A. Payment of the Bills - Authorize MOTION: I move to approve the payment of bills received through 8/31/23 and paid on 8/31/23 and approve the checks a issued for payroll 8/16/23 - 8/31/23 and paid on 9/5/23, all audited by the Committee of the Whole on 9/19/23. c B. Approval of Minutes i. Council Workshop - Workshop Regular Meeting - Sep 19, 2023 5:15 PM ii. City Council Meeting - City Council Regular Meeting - Sep 19, 2023 7:00 PM iii. City Council Meeting - City Council Special Meeting - Sep 26, 2023 5:00 PM iv. Council Workshop - Workshop Special Meeting - Sep 26, 2023 5:30 PM C. Resolution Ratifying 2021 Countywide Planning Policy Amendments - Adopt ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Page 5 of 8 Packet Pg. 244 8.A.2 Kent City Council City Council Regular Meeting October 3, 2023 Minutes Kent, Washington MOTION: I move to adopt Resolution No. 2066, ratifying an amendment to the 2021 King County Countywide Planning Policies adopted by King County. D. Interlocal Agreement for the Purpose of Pooling Capital Funds with other SKHHP Cities - Authorize MOTION: I move to authorize the Mayor to sign an interlocal agreement with other "South King County Housing and Homelessness Partner" cities to pool sales and use tax receipts, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the Parks Director and City Attorney. E. Mother Africa Building Economic Empowerment Program Agreement - Authorize o MOTION: I move to authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement o with Mother Africa for the Economic Empowerment Program, �. providing up to $200,000 in ARPA funds, subject to final terms Q and conditions acceptable to the Parks Director and City Attorney. a 0 IR F. Washington Traffic Safety Commission Interagency Agreement for the Walker and Roller Safety Grant Program - Authorize N 0 MOTION: I move to accept grant funds in the amount of M $614,000 from the Washington Traffic Safety Commission for the Walker and Roller Safety Grant Program, amend the o budget, authorize expenditure of funds, and authorize the ° Mayor to sign all necessary agreements and other documents, 3 subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the Police Chief and City Attorney. a� G. Consultant Services Agreement with KBA, Inc. for East Valley c Highway - Authorize a aD MOTION: Move to authorize the Mayor to sign the Consultant a Services Agreement with KBA, Inc. in the amount of $401,453, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the Public Works Director and City Attorney. H. Lake Fenwick Alum Treatment - Award MOTION: I move to award the Lake Fenwick Alum Treatment Project to SOLitude Lake Management in the amount of $114,255.17 and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary documents, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public Works Director. I. 2022 Paint Line Striping and Raised Pavement Marking Project - Accept as Complete ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Page 6 of 8 Packet Pg. 245 8.A.2 Kent City Council City Council Regular Meeting October 3, 2023 Minutes Kent, Washington MOTION: I move to accept the 2022 Paint Line Striping and Raised Pavement Marking Replacement Project as complete and authorize the Mayor to release retainage to Apply-A-Line, LLC. upon receipt of standard releases from the State and the release of any liens. J. South 224th Street Improvements, Phase 2 Project - Accept as Complete MOTION: I move to accept as complete the South 224t" Street Improvements Phase 2 Project, and authorize the Mayor to release retainage upon receipt of standard releases from the State and the release of any liens. K. 2023 Asphalt Grinding Project - Accept as Complete - Authorize o MOTION: I move to accept as complete, the 2023 Asphalt o Grinding Project, and authorize the Mayor to release retainage �. to AAA Contractors, Inc. upon receipt of standard releases from Q the State and the release of any liens. L. Excused Absence for Councilmember Thomas - Approve o MOTION: I move to approve an excused absence for M Councilmember Thomas for the meeting of September 26, o 2023. N M r 9. OTHER BUSINESS O A. Resolution Relating to the Utilization of Opioid Funds - Adopt w City Attorney, Tammy White presented details on the Resolution relating to the utilization of opioid litigation and settlement funds. a� White reviewed the history of the opioid lawsuit, settlement funds, and agreements the City entered into with the state and municipalities that related to the use of funds. a The funds can be used to remediate, respond, and abate the opioid crisis. However, in determining how to use opioid settlement funds, each municipality agreed to provide an opportunity for community-based input on priorities for programs and services to be funded using those funds. This resolution outlines the community input process. The draft resolution would provide that proposals related to the City's use of opioid settlement funds be evaluated during the budget or mid-biennial budget development process, and that the community be provided an opportunity to provide input and comment during the budget process on any proposed opioid remediation and abatement effort proposed to be funded. This resolution defines the process that will apply to the submission of staff proposals for use of opioid settlement funds and the community input that is ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Page 7 of 8 Packet Pg. 246 8.A.2 Kent City Council City Council Regular Meeting October 3, 2023 Minutes Kent, Washington required as part of Council's consideration of those proposals. This resolution passed unanimously out of today's Committee of the Whole meeting. MOTION: I move to adopt Resolution No. 2067 that establishes a process for the submission of community input on priorities for allocation strategies in the City's use of its opioid settlement funds. RESULT MOTION PASSES [UNANIMOUS] a r MOVER: Les Thomas, Councilmember SECONDER: Toni Troutner, Councilmember 4- AYES: Boyce, Fincher, Kaur, Larimer, Troutner, Thomas, Michaud o 0 L 10. BIDS Q None. a 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION AND ACTION AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION c ti None. N O N 12. ADJOURNMENT M r Mayor Ralph adjourned the meeting. o 0 m Meeting ended at 8:18 p.m. 3 Ki, Ley A. Kovwtcr City Clerk a a� Q a� ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Page 8 of 8 Packet Pg. 247 8.B KENT WASH IN G T O N DATE: October 17, 2023 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Payment of Bills - Authorize MOTION: I move to approve the payment of bills received through 9/15/23 and paid on 9/15/23 and approve the checks issued for payroll 9/1/23 - 9/15/23 and paid on 9/20/23, all audited by the Committee of the Whole on 10/3/2023. SUMMARY: Approval of payment of the bills received through: 09/15/23 and paid 09/15/23 Approval of checks issued for Vouchers: Date Document Numbers Amount 09/15/23 Wire Transfers 9847 9867 $2,901,528.74 09/15/23 Regular Checks 772879 773160 $4,901,732.65 09/15/23 Payment Plus 105336 105359 $100,081.61 Void Checks $0.00 Void Payment Plus $0.00 09/15/23 Use Tax Payable $2,578.68 Total Accounts Payable: $7,905,921.68 Approval of checks issued for Payroll: 09/01/23-09/15/23 and paid 09/20/23 Date Document Numbers Amount 09/20/23 Checks $2,391,081.83 Voids and Reissues $0.00 09/20/23 Advices FR&P 463618 463624 $4,370.65 Total Payroll: $2,395,452.48 SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Thriving City - Creating safe neighborhoods, healthy people, vibrant commercial districts, and inviting parks and recreation. 10/03/23 Committee of the Whole MOTION PASSES Packet Pg. 248 8.B RESULT: MOTION PASSES [UNANIMOUS]Next: 10/17/2023 7:00 PM MOVER: Les Thomas, Councilmember SECONDER: Toni Troutner, Councilmember AYES: Boyce, Fincher, Kaur, Larimer, Michaud, Thomas, Troutner Packet Pg. 249 8.0 KENT WASH IN G T O N DATE: October 17, 2023 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Agreement with Evergreen Technologies, Inc for Access Control and Security Camera Upgrades at the City Shops - Authorize MOTION: I move to authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement with Evergreen Technologies, Inc. in the amount of $153,936.32, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the Parks Director and City Attorney. SUMMARY: This project consists of replacing the existing 21 access control readers and 22 security cameras with new Verkada Systems equipment. Additionally, there will be four new cameras added to the system. We will also be accepting Alternate #1 to add two additional Verkada cameras to an existing light standard at the site bringing the total cameras at the site to 28. All cameras include 5-year cloud licensing as noted in the proposal. This project was bid through the small works roster, and Evergreen Technologies was the successful bidder. BUDGET IMPACT: The $153,936.32 cost is being funding by the Facilities Card Access Budget. SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Innovative Government - Delivering outstanding customer service, developing leaders, and fostering innovation. Evolving Infrastructure - Connecting people and places through strategic investments in physical and technological infrastructure. ATTACHMENTS: 1. FAC-Shops Access Contral and Security Cameras Upgrade-Exhibit (PDF) 10/03/23 Committee of the Whole MOTION PASSES Packet Pg. 250 8.0 RESULT: MOTION PASSES [UNANIMOUS]Next: 10/17/2023 7:00 PM MOVER: Zandria Michaud, Councilmember SECONDER: Satwinder Kaur, Councilmember AYES: Boyce, Fincher, Kaur, Larimer, Michaud, Thomas, Troutner Packet Pg. 251 8.C.a • KENT PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT E E between City of Kent and L Evergreen Technologies, Inc. THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the City of Kent, a Washington municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City"), and Evergreen Technologies, Inc. , organized under the laws of the State of c Washington, located and doing business at 3623 East Marginal Way S, Seattle, WA 98134, (hereinafter the "Contractor"). 0 U AGREEMENT aNi U The parties agree as follows: Q 0 I. DESCRIPTION OF WORK. E Contractor shall perform the following services for the City in accordance with the following a described plans and/or specifications: a rn 0 ti M As described in attached Exhibit A, incorporated herein, the Contractor shall replace the existing 21 access control readers and 22 security cameras with new Verkada Systems equipment. Additionally, there will be a total of six new cameras added to the system. All x w cameras include 5-year Cloud Licensing as noted in the proposal. a, c� L Q N The Contractor further represents that the services furnished under this Agreement will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices within the Puget Sound region in E effect at the time such services are performed. v II. TIME OF COMPLETION. The parties agree that work will begin on the tasks described in Section I above within 10 working days after the City issues its Notice to Proceed. Upon the effective date of this Agreement, all physical work shall thereafter be completed by 12/31/2023. The term of this N Agreement shall continue until all work has been completed, final acceptance has occurred, and all c Contractor obligations have been fulfilled. L Y III. COMPENSATION. The City shall pay the Contractor a total amount not to exceed o $153,936.32, including any applicable Washington State Sales Tax, for the work and services v contemplated in this Agreement. The Contractor shall invoice the City monthly. The City will pay for the portion of the work described in the invoice that has been completed by the Contractor and approved by the City. The City's payment shall not constitute a waiver of the City's right to final inspection and Q acceptance of the project. o Card Payment Program. The Contractor may elect to participate in automated credit card payments provided for by the City and its financial institution. This Program is provided as an alternative to payment by check and is available for the convenience of the Contractor. If the Contractor voluntarily participates r in this Program, the Contractor will be solely responsible for any fees imposed by financial institutions or credit card companies. The Contractor shall not charge those fees back to the City. E a PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 1 (Over$20K with Performance Bond) Packet Pg. 252 8.C.a A. Payment and Performance Bond. Pursuant to Chapter 39.08 RCW, the Contractor, shall provide the City a payment and performance bond for the full contract amount. M B. Retainage. The City shall hold back a retainage in the amount of five percent (5%) a� of any and all payments made to the Contractor for a period of sixty (60) days after E the date of final acceptance, or until receipt of all necessary releases from the State L) Department of Revenue, the State Department of Labor & Industries, and the State r L Employment Security Department, and until settlement of any liens filed under Chapter 60.28 RCW, whichever is later. The amount retained shall be placed in a fund by the City pursuant to RCW 60.28.011(4)(a), unless otherwise instructed by -0 the Contractor within fourteen (14) calendar days of the Contractor's signature on to the Agreement. o c C. Defective or Unauthorized Work. The City reserves its right to withhold payment Lj from the Contractor for any defective or unauthorized work. Defective or N unauthorized work includes, without limitation: work and materials that do not °; conform to the requirements of this Agreement; and extra work and materials Q furnished without the City's written approval. If the Contractor is unable, for any o reason, to satisfactorily complete any portion of the work, the City may complete the work by contract or otherwise, and the Contractor shall be liable to the City for any as additional costs incurred by the City. "Additional costs" shall mean all reasonable E costs, including legal costs and attorney fees, incurred by the City beyond the maximum Contract price specified above. The City further reserves its right to a deduct the cost to complete the Contract work, including any Additional Costs, from " any and all amounts due or to become due the Contractor. o M D. Final Payment: Waiver of Claims. THE CONTRACTOR'S ACCEPTANCE OF FINAL PAYMENT (EXCLUDING WITHHELD RETAINAGE) SHALL CONSTITUTE A WAIVER OF CONTRACTOR'S CLAIMS, EXCEPT THOSE PREVIOUSLY AND PROPERLY MADE AND w IDENTIFIED BY CONTRACTOR AS UNSETTLED AT THE TIME FINAL PAYMENT IS MADE .a AND ACCEPTED. a� a IV. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The parties intend that an Independent Contractor- Employer Relationship will be created by this Agreement. By their execution of this Agreement, and in i accordance with Ch. 51.08 RCW, the parties make the following representations: A. The Contractor has the ability to control and direct the performance and details of its ', work, the City being interested only in the results obtained under this Agreement. B. The Contractor maintains and pays for its own place of business from which the in Contractor's services under this Agreement will be performed. C. The Contractor has an established and independent business that is eligible for a business deduction for federal income tax purposes that existed before the City o retained the Contractor's services and is a service other than that furnished by the N City, or the Contractor is engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession, or business of the same nature as that involved under this Agreement. U a D. The Contractor is responsible for filing as they become due all necessary tax o documents with appropriate federal and state agencies, including the Internal � Revenue Service and the state Department of Revenue. Cn a E. The Contractor has registered its business and established an account with the state U- r Department of Revenue and other state agencies as may be required by the Contractor's business, and has obtained a Unified Business Identifier (UBI) number E from the State of Washington. a PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 2 (Over$20K with Performance Bond) Packet Pg. 253 8.C.a F. The Contractor has a valid contractor registration pursuant to Ch. 18.27 RCW or an electrical contractor license pursuant to Ch. 19.28 RCW. c� G. The Contractor maintains a set of books dedicated to the expenses and earnings of its business. E U V. TERMINATION. The City may terminate this Agreement for good cause. "Good cause" L shall include, without limitation, any one or more of the following events: m U) A. The Contractor's refusal or failure to supply a sufficient number of properly skilled c workers or proper materials for completion of the Contract work. ca 0 L B. The Contractor's failure to complete the work within the time specified in this c Agreement. v C. The Contractor's failure to make full and prompt payment to subcontractors or for °; material or labor. Q L O D. The Contractor's persistent disregard of federal, state or local laws, rules or regulations. m E. The Contractor's filing for bankruptcy or becoming adjudged bankrupt. a� a F. The Contractor's breach of any portion of this Agreement. 0 ti If the City terminates this Agreement for good cause, the Contractor shall not receive any further money due under this Agreement until the Contract work is completed. After termination, the City may take possession of all records and data within the Contractor's possession pertaining to this project which may be used by the City without restriction. w m VI. PREVAILING WAGES. The Contractor shall file a "Statement of Intent to Pay Prevailing Wages," with the State of Washington Department of Labor & Industries prior to commencing the Contract a work. The Contractor shall pay prevailing wages in effect on the date the bid is accepted or executed by the Contractor, and comply with Chapter 39.12 of the Revised Code of Washington, as well as any other i applicable prevailing wage rate provisions. The latest prevailing wage rate revision issued by the Department of Labor and Industries is attached. M U VII. CHANGES. The City may issue a written change order for any change in the Contract work during the performance of this Agreement. If the Contractor determines, for any reason, that a change order is necessary, the Contractor must submit a written change order request to the person listed in the N notice provision section of this Agreement, Section XVI(D), within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date the Contractor knew or should have known of the facts and events giving rise to the requested change. If the City determines that the change increases or decreases the Contractor's costs or time for performance, the City will make an equitable adjustment. The City will attempt, in good faith, to reach o agreement with the Contractor on all equitable adjustments. However, if the parties are unable to agree, N the City will determine the equitable adjustment as it deems appropriate. The Contractor shall proceed with the change order work upon receiving either a written change order from the City or an oral order from the City before actually receiving the written change order. If the Contractor fails to require a Q change order within the time specified in this paragraph, the Contractor waives its right to make any claim o or submit subsequent change order requests for that portion of the contract work. If the Contractor = disagrees with the equitable adjustment, the Contractor must complete the change order work; however, Cn the Contractor may elect to protest the adjustment as provided in subsections A through E of Section IX, < Claims, below. .. r c m The Contractor accepts all requirements of a change order by: (1) endorsing it, (2) writing a E separate acceptance, or (3) not protesting in the way this section provides. A change order that is o accepted by the Contractor as provided in this section shall constitute full payment and final settlement of Q PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 3 (Over$20K with Performance Bond) Packet Pg. 254 8.C.a all claims for contract time and for direct, indirect and consequential costs, including costs of delays related to any work, either covered or affected by the change. ca VIII. FORCE MAJEURE. Neither party shall be liable to the other for breach due to delay or failure in performance resulting from acts of God, acts of war or of the public enemy, riots, pandemic, fire, 0 flood, or other natural disaster or acts of government ('force majeure event"). Performance that is U prevented or delayed due to a force majeure event shall not result in liability to the delayed party. Both r L parties represent to the other that at the time of signing this Agreement, they are able to perform as = required and their performance will not be prevented, hindered, or delayed by the current COVID-19 in pandemic, any existing state or national declarations of emergency, or any current social distancing a restrictions or personal protective equipment requirements that may be required under federal, state, or ca local law in response to the current pandemic. o c If any future performance is prevented or delayed by a force majeure event, the party whose v performance is prevented or delayed shall promptly notify the other party of the existence and nature of N the force majeure event causing the prevention or delay in performance. Any excuse from liability shall be effective only to the extent and duration of the force majeure event causing the prevention or delay in Q performance and, provided, that the party prevented or delayed has not caused such event to occur and o continues to use diligent, good faith efforts to avoid the effects of such event and to perform the 0 obligation. E Notwithstanding other provisions of this section, the Contractor shall not be entitled to, and the City shall not be liable for, the payment of any part of the contract price during a force majeure event, or a any costs, losses, expenses, damages, or delay costs incurred by the Contractor due to a force majeure event. Performance that is more costly due to a force majeure event is not included within the scope of o this Force Majeure provision. r If a force majeure event occurs, the City may direct the Contractor to restart any work or performance that may have ceased, to change the work, or to take other action to secure the work or the x project site during the force majeure event. The cost to restart, change, or secure the work or project site LY arising from a direction by the City under this clause will be dealt with as a change order, except to the extent that the loss or damage has been caused or exacerbated by the failure of the Contractor to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement. Except as expressly contemplated by this section, all other costs will be borne by the Contractor, L d IX. CLAIMS. If the Contractor disagrees with anything required by a change order, another E written order, or an oral order from the City, including any direction, instruction, interpretation, or U determination by the City, the Contractor may file a claim as provided in this section. The Contractor shall give written notice to the City of all claims within fourteen (14) calendar days of the occurrence of the events giving rise to the claims, or within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date the Contractor knew or in should have known of the facts or events giving rise to the claim, whichever occurs first . Any claim for damages, additional payment for any reason, or extension of time, whether under this Agreement or otherwise, shall be conclusively deemed to have been waived by the Contractor unless a timely written claim is made in strict accordance with the applicable provisions of this Agreement. 0 U At a minimum, a Contractor's written claim shall include the information set forth in subsections A, N items 1 through 5 below. a FAILURE TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE, WRITTEN NOTIFICATION OF CLAIM WITHIN cn THE TIME ALLOWED SHALL BE AN ABSOLUTE WAIVER OF ANY CLAIMS ARISING IN o ANY WAY FROM THE FACTS OR EVENTS SURROUNDING THAT CLAIM OR CAUSED Cn BY THAT DELAY. a U- A. Notice of Claim. Provide a signed written notice of claim that provides the following information: m E 1. The date of the Contractor's claim; c 2. The nature and circumstances that caused the claim; Q PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 4 (Over$20K with Performance Bond) Packet Pg. 255 8.C.a 3. The provisions in this Agreement that support the claim; 4. The estimated dollar cost, if any, of the claimed work and how that estimate was determined; and M 5. An analysis of the progress schedule showing the schedule change or disruption if the Contractor is asserting a schedule change or disruption. 0 U B. Records. The Contractor shall keep complete records of extra costs and time incurred as a r L result of the asserted events giving rise to the claim. The City shall have access to any of the Contractor's records needed for evaluating the protest. The City will evaluate all claims, provided the procedures in this section are followed. If the cm City determines that a claim is valid, the City will adjust payment for work or time by an o equitable adjustment. No adjustment will be made for an invalid protest. c U C. Contractor's Duty to Complete Protested Work. In spite of any claim, the Contractor shall N proceed promptly to provide the goods, materials and services required by the City under °; this Agreement. Q L 0 D. Failure to Protest Constitutes Waiver. By not protesting as this section provides, the Contractor also waives any additional entitlement and accepts from the City any written or oral order (including directions, instructions, interpretations, and determination). E as L E. Failure to Follow Procedures Constitutes Waiver. By failing to follow the procedures of this a section, the Contractor completely waives any claims for protested work and accepts from the City any written or oral order (including directions, instructions, interpretations, and o determination). r X. LIMITATION OF ACTIONS. CONTRACTOR MUST, IN ANY EVENT, FILE ANY LAWSUIT ARISING FROM OR CONNECTED WITH THIS AGREEMENT WITHIN 120 CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE DATE w THE CONTRACT WORK IS COMPLETE OR CONTRACTOR'S ABILITY TO FILE THAT CLAIM OR SUIT SHALL BE .a FOREVER BARRED. THIS SECTION FURTHER LIMITS ANY APPLICABLE STATUTORY LIMITATIONS PERIOD. a� a XI. WARRANTY. The Contractor warrants that it will faithfully and satisfactorily perform all work provided under this Agreement in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. The Contractor i shall promptly correct all defects in workmanship and materials: (1) when the Contractor knows or should have known of the defect, or (2) upon the Contractor's receipt of notification from the City of the v existence or discovery of the defect. In the event any parts are repaired or replaced, only original ', replacement parts shall be used—rebuilt or used parts will not be acceptable. When defects are corrected, the warranty for that portion of the work shall extend for an additional year beyond the original warranty period applicable to the overall work. The Contractor shall begin to correct any defects within seven (7) N calendar days of its receipt of notice from the City of the defect. If the Contractor does not accomplish the corrections within a reasonable time as determined by the City, the City may complete the corrections and the Contractor shall pay all costs incurred by the City in order to accomplish the correction. c 0 XII. DISCRIMINATION. In the hiring of employees for the performance of work under this N Agreement or any sub-contract, the Contractor, its sub-contractors, or any person acting on behalf of the Contractor or sub-contractor shall not, by reason of race, religion, color, sex, age, sexual orientation, national origin, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability, discriminate against any Q person who is qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates. The o Contractor shall execute the attached City of Kent Non-Discrimination Policy Declaration and comply with = City Administrative Policy 1.2. v a XIII. INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, u- r officials, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the Contractor's E performance of this Agreement, except for that portion of the injuries and damages caused by the City's negligence. Q PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 5 (Over$20K with Performance Bond) Packet Pg. 256 8.C.a The City's inspection or acceptance of any of the Contractor's work when completed shall not be grounds to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification. c� Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW as 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to E property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Contractor and the City, its officers, U officials, employees, agents and volunteers, the Contractor's duty to defend, indemnify, and hold the City L harmless, and the Contractor's liability accruing from that obligation shall be only to the extent of the Contractor's negligence. IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE INDEMNIFICATION PROVIDED HEREIN CONSTITUTES THE CONTRACTOR'S WAIVER OF IMMUNITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL o INSURANCE, TITLE 51 RCW, SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS INDEMNIFICATION. THE PARTIES c FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED THIS WAIVER. U In the event the Contractor refuses tender of defense in any suit or any claim, if that tender was °; made pursuant to this indemnification clause, and if that refusal is subsequently determined by a court Q having jurisdiction (or other agreed tribunal) to have been a wrongful refusal on the Contractor's part, o then the Contractor shall pay all the City's costs for defense, including all reasonable expert witness fees and reasonable attorneys' fees, plus the City's legal costs and fees incurred because there was a wrongful refusal on the Contractor's part. E as L The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. a rn XIV. INSURANCE. The Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance of the types and in the amounts described in Exhibit B attached and incorporated by this reference. J- XV. WORK PERFORMED AT CONTRACTOR'S RISK. The Contractor shall take all necessary w precautions and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and subcontractors in the .� performance of the contract work and shall utilize all protection necessary for that purpose. All work shall be done at the Contractor's own risk, and the Contractor shall be responsible for any loss of or damage to a materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in connection with the work. N R L XVI. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. cc A. Recyclable Materials. Pursuant to Chapter 3.80 of the Kent City Code, the City requires its L, contractors and consultants to use recycled and recyclable products whenever practicable. A price preference may be available for any designated recycled product. B. Non-Waiver of Breach. The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, or to exercise any option conferred by this `° Agreement in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of those covenants, agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect. c U C. Resolution of Disputes and Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. If the parties are unable to settle any dispute, difference or claim arising from the parties' performance of this Agreement, the exclusive means Q of resolving that dispute, difference or claim, shall only be by filing suit exclusively under the venue, rules o and jurisdiction of the King County Superior Court, King County, Washington, unless the parties agree in writing to an alternative dispute resolution process. In any claim or lawsuit for damages arising from the parties' performance of this Agreement, each party shall pay all its legal costs and attorney's fees incurred < in defending or bringing such claim or lawsuit, including all appeals, in addition to any other recovery or .. r award provided by law; provided, however, nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit the City's right to indemnification under Section XIII of this Agreement. E D. Written Notice. All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the parties at V the addresses listed on the signature page of the Agreement, unless notified to the contrary. Any written PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 6 (Over$20K with Performance Bond) Packet Pg. 257 8.C.a notice hereunder shall become effective three (3) business days after the date of mailing by registered or certified mail, and shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing. L E. Assignment. Any assignment of this Agreement by either party without the written consent E of the non-assigning party shall be void. If the non-assigning party gives its consent to any assignment, the terms of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and no further assignment shall be r L made without additional written consent. m U) F. Modification. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions of this c Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the City ca and the Contractor. o c G. Entire Agreement. The written provisions and terms of this Agreement, together with any Lj Exhibits attached hereto, shall supersede all prior verbal statements of any officer or other representative N of the City, and such statements shall not be effective or be construed as entering into or forming a part °; of or altering in any manner this Agreement. All of the above documents are hereby made a part of this Q Agreement. However, should any language in any of the Exhibits to this Agreement conflict with any o language contained in this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. c m H. Compliance with Laws. The Contractor agrees to comply with all federal, state, and E municipal laws, rules, and regulations that are now effective or in the future become applicable to the 0 Contractor's business, equipment, and personnel engaged in operations covered by this Agreement or a accruing out of the performance of those operations. 0 ti I. Public Records Act. The Contractor acknowledges that the City is a public agency subject to the Public Records Act codified in Chapter 42.56 of the Revised Code of Washington and documents, notes, emails, and other records prepared or gathered by the Contractor in its performance of this Agreement may be subject to public review and disclosure, even if those records are not produced to or w possessed by the City of Kent. As such, the Contractor agrees to cooperate fully with the City in satisfying .� the City's duties and obligations under the Public Records Act. a� a J. City Business License Required. Prior to commencing the tasks described in Section I, the Contractor agrees to provide proof of a current city of Kent business license pursuant to Chapter 5.01 of i the Kent City Code. U L V N L Y O U a� v a N Q O t Cn U a U_ r E a PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 7 (Over$20K with Performance Bond) Packet Pg. 258 8.C.a K. Counterparts and Signatures by Fax or Email. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, and all of which will together constitute this one Agreement. Further, upon executing this Agreement, either party may deliver the signature page to the other by fax or email and that signature shall have the same force and effect as if the Agreement bearing the original signature was received in person. E U IN WITNESS, the parties below execute this Agreement, which shall become effective on L the last date entered below. All acts consistent with the authority of this Agreement and prior to its effective date are ratified and affirmed, and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed cn to have applied. CONTRACTOR: CITY OF KENT: o c 0 U By: By: N Print Name: Print Name: Dana Ralph Q L 0 Its Its Mayor (title) DATE: DATE: m a� L a� a NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: o� 0 ti M CONTRACTOR: CITY OF KENT: r Brad King Will Moore x Evergreen Technologies, Inc w 3623 E. Marginal Way So. City of Kent 'aa CU Seattle, WA 98134 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 (206) 774-1369(telephone) bking@evergreentec.com(email) (253) 856-5081(telephone) wmoore@kentwa.gov(email) E U r APPROVED AS TO FORM: a� c 0 Kent Law Department c ATTEST: 0 U Cn N a� Q Kent City Clerk a 0 U Q U- r c d E t R r w Q PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 8 (Over$20K with Performance Bond) Packet Pg. 259 8.C.a DECLARATION CITY OF KENT NON-DISCRIMINATION POLICY as E U The City of Kent (City) is committed to conform to Federal and State laws regarding equal opportunity. As such all contractors, subcontractors, consultants, vendors, and suppliers who perform work with relation to this Agreement shall comply with the regulations of the City's in equal employment opportunity policies. c The City of Kent and its contractors are subject to and will comply with the following: o 0 • Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin); U • 49 C.F.R. Part 21 (entitled Non-discrimination In Federally-Assisted Programs Q L Of The Department Of Transportation-Effectuation Of Title VI Of The Civil 0 Rights Act Of 1964); E a� • 28 C.F.R. section 50.3 (U.S. Department of Justice Guidelines for Enforcement of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964). a • Ch. 49.60 RCW (Washington Law Against Discrimination) M The preceding statutory and regulatory cites hereinafter are referred to as "the Acts and x Regulations". a The following statements specifically identify the requirements the City deems necessary for any a contractor, subcontractor, or supplier on this specific Agreement to adhere to. An affirmation of all of the following is required for this Agreement to be valid and binding. If any contractor, i subcontractor, or supplier willfully misrepresents themselves with regard to the directives E outlined below, it will be considered a breach of contract and it will be at the City's sole M determination regarding suspension or termination for all or part of the Agreement. L The statements are as follows: in 1. I have read the attached City of Kent administrative policy number 1.2. L Y 2. During the time of this Agreement I will not discriminate in employment on the basis of c sex, race, color, national origin, age, or the presence of all sensory, mental or physical N disability. U 3. During the time of this Agreement I, the prime contractor, will provide a written y statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal 0 opportunity employer. v U 4. During the time of the Agreement I, the prime contractor, will actively consider hiring and U_ promotion of women and minorities. E 5. During the performance of this contract, the contractor, for itself, its assignees, and successors in interest (hereinafter referred to as the "contractor") agrees as follows: Q EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 1 Packet Pg. 260 8.C.a A. Compliance with Regulations: The contractor, subcontractor, consultant, vendor, and supplier (hereinafter "Contractor") will comply with all Acts and the Regulations relative to non-discrimination, including those applicable to Federally- 2 assisted programs of the U.S. Department of Transportation, State-assisted E programs through the Washington State Department of Transportation, and generally under Washington's Law Against Discrimination, Ch. 49.60 RCW, as they r may be amended from time to time, which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract. B. Non-discrimination: The contractor, with regard to the work performed by it during the contract, will not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurements of c materials and leases of equipment. The contractor will not participate directly or U indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by the Acts and the Regulations, including employment practices when the contract covers any activity, project, or program Q set forth in Appendix B of 49 CFR Part 21. 0 C. Solicitations for Subcontracts, Including Procurements of Materials and Equipment: In all solicitations, either by competitive bidding, or negotiation made by the contractor for work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurements of materials, or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor or a supplier will be notified by the contractor of the contractor's obligations under this o contract and the Acts and the Regulations relative to non-discrimination on the M grounds of race, color, or national origin. D. Information and Reports: The contractor will provide all information and reports w required by the Acts and Regulations and directives issued pursuant thereto and will .� permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and its 2 facilities as may be determined applicable to contractor's contract by the City or the Washington State Department of Transportation to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Acts and Regulations and instructions. Where any information required of a contractor is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or E refuses to furnish the information, the contractor will so certify to the City or the U Washington State Department of Transportation, as appropriate, and will set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information. a� E. Sanctions for Noncompliance: In the event of a contractor's noncompliance with the non-discrimination provisions of this contract, the City will impose such contract sanctions as it or the Washington State Department of Transportation may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to: U a. withholding payments to the contractor under the contract until the U contractor complies; and/or a b. cancelling, terminating, or suspending a contract, in whole or in part. o F. Incorporation of Provisions: The contractor will include the provisions of L) paragraphs (A) through (F) above in every subcontract, including procurements of < materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Acts and Regulations and directives issued pursuant thereto. The contractor will take action with respect to any subcontract or procurement as the City or the Washington State Department of Transportation may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for noncompliance. Provided, that if the contractor becomes involved in, Q EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 2 Packet Pg. 261 8.C.a or is threatened with litigation by a subcontractor, or supplier because of such direction, the contractor may request the City to enter into any litigation to protect the interests of the City. In addition, the contractor may request the United States to enter into the litigation to protect the interests of the United States. 0 U 6. During the performance of this contract, the contractor, for itself, its assignees, and successors in interest agrees to comply with the following non-discrimination statutes and authorities; including but not limited to: cn c Pertinent Non-Discrimination Authorities: o c 0 i. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin); and 49 CFR Part 21. Q ii. The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of o 1970, (42 U.S.C. § 4601), (prohibits unfair treatment of persons displaced or whose property has been acquired because of Federal or Federal-aid programs and E projects); iii. Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973, (23 U.S.C. § 324 et seq.), (prohibits a discrimination on the basis of sex); o iv. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq.), as amended, (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability); and 49 CFR Part 27; V. The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, (42 U.S.C. § 6101 et seq.), x (prohibits discrimination on the basis of age); w a� vi. Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, (49 USC § 471, Section 47123), as amended, (prohibits discrimination based on race, creed, color, national origin, or a sex); vii. The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, (PL 100-209), (Broadened the scope, coverage and applicability of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by > expanding the definition of the terms "programs or activities" to include all of the programs or activities of the Federal-aid recipients, sub-recipients and contractors, whether such programs or activities are Federally funded or not); viii. Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability in the operation of public entities, public and private transportation systems, places of public accommodation, and certain testing entities ci (42 U.S.C. §§ 12131-12189) as implemented by Department of Transportation regulations at 49 C.F.R. parts 37 and 38; ix. The Federal Aviation Administration's Non-discrimination statute (49 U.S.C. § y a 47123) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, and 0 sex); L? U X. Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, which ensures Non- discrimination against minority populations by discouraging programs, policies, and E activities with disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority and low-income populations; Q EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 3 Packet Pg. 262 8.C.a xi. Executive Order 13166, Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency, and resulting agency guidance, national origin discrimination includes discrimination because of Limited English proficiency (LEP). To ensure compliance with Title VI, you must take reasonable steps to ensure that LEP E ° persons have meaningful access to your programs (70 Fed. Reg. at 74087 to 74100); E xii. Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, which prohibits you a Cn from discriminating because of sex in education programs or activities (20 U.S.C. c 1681 et seq). xiii. Washington Law Against Discrimination (Ch. 49.60 RCW) ° c ° 7. The submission of the final invoice for this contract will constitute a reaffirmation that the N preceding statements were complied with during the course of the contract's performance. By signing below, I agree to fulfill the five requirements referenced above. o 4- a� By: For: Q 0 Title: M r Date: -2 x w aY CU L Q L c� E U r v a� c R L ° U Cn N a� Q Q ° t U Q U- r c d E t R r w Q EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 4 Packet Pg. 263 8.C.a CITY OF KENT ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY L E U NUMBER: 1.2 EFFECTIVE DATE: October 20, 2022 r L V d U) SUBJECT: INCLUSIVE CONTRACTING SUPERSEDES: January 1, 1998 c 0 APPROVED BY Dana Ralph, Mayor U as POLICY: a L Equal employment opportunity and non-discrimination in contracting requirements for the City of Kent will conform to federal and state laws. All contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and a suppliers of the City must guarantee equal employment opportunity within their organization E and, if holding Agreements with the City amounting to $10,000 or more within any given year, must take the following affirmative steps: a 0 1. Provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating M commitment as an equal opportunity employer. 2. Actively consider for promotion and advancement available minorities and women. w a� Further, all contractors, subcontractors, consultants, suppliers, grantees, or subgrantees of the City, regardless of the value of the Agreement, are required to sign the City's Non-Discrimination a Policy Declaration, prior to commencing performance. y 0 L Any contractor, subcontractor, consultant or supplier who willfully disregards the City's E nondiscrimination and equal opportunity requirements shall be considered in breach of contract U and subject to suspension or termination for all or part of the Agreement. L V Contract Compliance Officers will be appointed by the Directors of Planning, Parks, and Public in Works Departments to coordinate with the City's Title VI coordinator, and perform the following duties for their respective departments. L Y 1. Ensuring that contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and suppliers subject to these o regulations are familiar with the regulations and the City's equal employment opportunity N policy. a 2. Monitoring to assure adherence to federal, state and local laws, policies and guidelines. a 0 Cn U a U_ r E a EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 5 Packet Pg. 264 8.C.a BIDDER RESPONSIBILITY CRITERIA Certification of Compliance with Wage Payment Statutes E U This certification is required by state law (RCW 39.04.350(2)) to be submitted to the City before the contract can be awarded. U) c The bidder hereby certifies that, within the three-year period immediately preceding the bid E. solicitation date (9/19/2023), the bidder is not a "willful" violator, as defined in RCW 49.48.082, or- of of any provision of chapters 49.46, 49.48, or 49.52 RCW, as determined by a final and binding N citation and notice of assessment issued by the Department of Labor and Industries or through a civil judgment entered by a court of limited or general jurisdiction. Q L O Y I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. E L Evergreen Technologies, Inc. a 0 ti M r By: _2 Signature of Authorized Official* w as Printed Name: L Q Title: N R L Date: E M U City and State: L *If a corporation, proposal must be executed in the corporate name by the president or vice- in president (or any other corporate officer accompanied by evidence of authority to sign). If a co- partnership, proposal must be executed by a partner. L Y O U a� v a N Q O M U a U_ r E a BIDDER RESPONSIBILITY CRITERIA - 1 Packet Pg. 265 8.C.a EVERGREEN Exhibit A TECHNOLOGIES INC. Communication Consulting and Contracting E September 19, 2023 U r City of Kent- Shops Verkada Upgrade 5821 S 240th St. Kent, WA 98032. c Attn: Will Moore o P: 206-445-3761 c E: WMoore(a)-kentwa.gov c0 Scope of Work— 5 Vear solution N • Provide a 30% discount off MSRP on all Verkada hardware and software licenses. U • Provide and install (1) AC62 16 door controller and (2) AC 42 door controllers to tenants existing Q communications rooms wall field . Quote assumes sufficient electrical outlets space to support ,0 unit. • Provide and install (1) 18 hour back up battery to (1) AC 62 unit and (1)4 hour back up battery E to (2) AC 42 units. • Provide and install (1) cat 6 connection to (3) Access control head end units unit to get units on a existing network. • Provide (1) 5 year licenses for (21) doors and gate card readers. CD • Provide (1) Multi format Verkada card reader to (21) door/gate locations and remove existing card readers. r • Provide customer platform set up and enrollment of Verkada products before completion of install. w • Terminate and label all cables from existing access control units and power supplies to new -6 Verkada head end units. • Provide and install (1) cat 6 OSP cable from existing communications room rack to (5) cameras utilizing existing pathways for poles and new pathways for rear shed. • Provide and install (21) cameras in a like for like swap and utilized existing cabling for these locations. E • Provide pole mounts, angle mounts, arm and pendent mounts based on camera types as v needed. .L • Provide and install (26) cameras according to layout detailed in document titled "Updated Kent Shops Verkada Camera Layout (2)" • Provide and install POE ++ injectors for multisensory camera locations. 120 volt outlet is assumed existing for injectors and not included in this quote. • Mount and aim (26) cameras with customers final say in image positioning. • Provide (26) 5 year software camera license for all cameras. o • Provide (1) 5 year alarms 24/7 live monitoring license for building. N • All work to be completed on normal day shift hours. • Provide project bond and file certified payroll for the project. Q • All networking and POE equipment to be existing or customer provided. Any networking port a configurations to be completed by customer IT group. 0 • All employee access cards and employee card enrollment to be completed by customer. vn U a tL r ,r List of Materials and Services Below: E a 3623 East Marginal Way S,Seattle,WA 98134•T(206)774-1400•F(206)774-1401 Packet Pg. 266 8.C.a EVERGREEN TECHNOLOGIES INC. Communication Consulting and Contracting Date: 9/19/2023 E U r Manf. Item Description Qty. Unit Verkada AD33 Multi-format Card Reader 21 ea Verkada AC62 16 Door Controller 1 ea Verkada Hardware and: are Verkada 18AH Backup Battery 1 ea $93,295.70 Verkada AC42 4 Door Controller 2 ea o L Verkada 4AH Backup Battery 2 ea c Verkada 5-Year Camera License 24 ea 0 U Verkada 5-Year Door License 21 ea rn Verkada 5-Year Standard Alarm License 1 ea U Verkada CF81-E Outdoor Fisheye Camera, 512GB, 30 Days Max 22 ea a Verkada CH52-E Outdoor Multisensor Camera, 1TB,30 Days Max 2 ea o 0 Verkada CB62-TE Outdoor Bullet Camera, 512GB, 30 Days Max 2 ea Verkada 5-Year CH52 Multisensor Camera License 2 ea Verkada PoE++ 802.3bt-2018 Injector, Gi E 2 ea m a� Verkada Angle Mount 20 ea Verkada Arm Mount 2 ea Q Verkada Pendant Cap Mount 2 ea rn 0 Verkada Square Junction Box Mount 2 ea M Verkada Pole Mount, 2nd Generation 10 ea r Verkada Shipping and Handling 1 ea berk tek Cat 6 OSP 1 M K berk tek RJ 45 male connectors 1 ea w m Belden 18/2 control wire 0.25 m labor and material for in: Belden 22/4 control wire 0.25 m $40,654.30 Panduit latch ducting 1 ea Evergreen Tech Cable supports 1 ea Evergreen Tech ID and decom existing AC cables 1 ea Evergreen Tech terminations of cabling to AC 41 s 21 ea E Evergreen Tech remove/Mount card readers 21 ea U Evergreen Tech Mount AC headend 3 ea L Evergreen Tech remove existing cameras 1 ea Evergreen Tech Mount and aim cameras 24 ea Evergreen Tech platform set up/enrollment 1 ea c Evergreen Tech building penetration 1 ea Evergreen Tech boom lift rental 1 ea Evergreen Tech Labeling of cables 1 ea 0 Evergreen Tech Misc Cabling Consumables 1 ea U Evergreen Tech Project Management 1 ea ui a� Evergreen Tech Administration 1 ea U Evergreen Tech Project performance bond 1 ea Q Evergreen Tech intent and affidavit 1 ea a Project Total: $ 133,950.00 Cn (Price does not include Washington State Sales Tax) < r c as E 0 a 3623 East Marginal Way S,Seattle,WA 98134•T(206)774-1400•F(206)774-1401 Packet Pg. 267 8.C.a EVERGREEN TECHNOLOGIES INC. Communication Consulting and Contracting Scope of Work— 5 near solution Alternate #1 E U • Provide and install (2) CF-81 fisheye cameras with (1) angle mount each to mainshops building. r L • Provide and install (1) cat 6 cable to each camera and route back to nearest POE switch. • Provide penetration of building for cable pathways. in • All work to be completed on normal day shift hours. • All networking and POE equipment to be existing or customer provided. Any networking port f° configurations to be completed by customer IT group. c O U List of Materials and Services Below: Date: 911912023 a L O Manf. Item Description Qty. Unit Verkada E Verkada 5-Year Camera License 2 ea hardware Verkada CF81-E Outdoor Fisheye Camera, 512GB, 30 Days Max 2 ea and software: Verkada Angle Mount 2 ea 4,320.80 Q Verkada Shipping and Handling 1 ea c berk tek Cat 6 0.5 M M Labor and berk tek RJ 45 male connectors 1 ea material Evergreen Tech Cable supports 1 ea for install: K Evergreen Tech Mount and aim cameras 2 ea 1,544.20 w Evergreen Tech platform set up/enrollment 1 ea Evergreen Tech Labeling of cables 2 ea f° Evergreen Tech Misc Cabling Consumables 1 ea °- Evergreen Tech Project Management 1 ea rn Evergreen Tech Administration 1 ea i m Project Total: $5,865.00 E U (Price does not include Washington State Sales Tax) L V N L Y O U rn a� v a N Q O t Cn U a tL r ,r E a 3623 East Marginal Way S,Seattle,WA 98134•T(206)774-1400•F(206)774-1401 Packet Pg. 268 8.C.a EVERGREEN TECHNOLOGIES INC. Communication Consulting and Contracting Terms and Conditions: E Evergreen Technologies Inc. requires a signed copy of this quotation before the work can begin. U This quotation is valid for a period of 30-days. r The quotation is based on normal working hours 6:00am to 4:00pm Monday-Friday (Excluding Holidays) Evergreen Technologies Inc. guarantees the completed project for a period of 1 year; Manufactures extended product warranty is available upon request. Evergreen Technologies Inc. reserves the right to make any modifications necessary to meet any code o requirements needed to complete the project. c U Customer Billing Information: N as U Purchase Order Number: Q L O Contact Person for Payment Questions: as Contact Person Telephone Number: as L Company Name: a a� 0 Billing Address: r City, State and Zip Code: x Resale Certificate#: w as (Non-Taxable only- Supply copy of Re-sale certificate) a Signature for acceptance of proposal: N R L d E U L V N L Y O U rn a� v a N Q O t Thank you, Q Adam Nolting U_ Project Manager Evergreen Technologies, Inc. E (206) 900-2560 anoltingCc)evergreentec.com a 3623 East Marginal Way S,Seattle,WA 98134•T(206)774-1400•F(206)774-1401 Packet Pg. 269 8.D KENT WASH IN G T O N DATE: October 17, 2023 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Agreement with Convergint Technologies, LLC for Fire Alarm Upgrades at the Centennial Center - Authorize MOTION: I move to authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement with Convergint Technologies, LLC in the amount of $153,263.60, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the Parks Director and City Attorney. SUMMARY: This project consists of replacing the existing fire alarm panel in Centennial Center with a new panel providing a new full coverage fire alarm system. The new full system will consist of horn/strobe notification devices placed throughout the building, new pull station devices at required exits, and a new alarm annunciator panel. This project was bid through the small works roster, and Convergint Technologies was the successful bidder. BUDGET IMPACT: The $153,263.60 cost is being funded by the Fire Alarm Upgrades budget. SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Evolving Infrastructure - Connecting people and places through strategic investments in physical and technological infrastructure. Sustainable Services - Providing quality services through responsible financial management, economic growth, and partnerships. ATTACHMENTS: 1. FAC-Centennial Center Fire Alarm Upgrades-Exhibit (PDF) 10/03/23 Committee of the Whole MOTION PASSES Packet Pg. 270 8.D RESULT: MOTION PASSES [UNANIMOUS]Next: 10/17/2023 7:00 PM MOVER: Zandria Michaud, Councilmember SECONDER: Satwinder Kaur, Councilmember AYES: Boyce, Fincher, Kaur, Larimer, Michaud, Thomas, Troutner Packet Pg. 271 8.D.a KENT PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT L between City of Kent and U Convergint Technologies, LLC THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the City of Kent, a Washington municipal corporation a (hereinafter the "City"), and Convergint Technologies, LLC , organized under the laws of the State of Washington, located and doing business at 450 Shattuck Ave. S, Suite 100, Renton, WA 98057, (hereinafter the "Contractor"). o a� AGREEMENT L The parties agree as follows: E L I. DESCRIPTION OF WORK. f° Q m Contractor shall perform the following services for the City in accordance with the following described plans and/or specifications: `o 0 r c m E a) As described in attached Exhibit A, incorporated herein, the Contractor shall replace the existing fire alarm panel with a new panel providing a new full coverage fire alarm system. Q New full system consists of horn/strobe notification devices placed throughout the building, c new pull station devices at required exits, and a new alarm annunciator panel. M a+ t K The Contractor further represents that the services furnished under this Agreement will be w performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices within the Puget Sound region in effect at the time such services are performed. v a II. TIME OF COMPLETION. The parties agree that work will begin on the tasks described in :3 Section I above within 10 working days after the City issues its Notice to Proceed. Upon the effective date E of this Agreement, all physical work shall thereafter be completed by 2/28/2024. The term of this Q Agreement shall continue until all work has been completed, final acceptance has occurred, and all Contractor obligations have been fulfilled. ii L III. COMPENSATION. The City shall pay the Contractor a total amount not to exceed m $153,263.60, including any applicable Washington State Sales Tax, for the work and services U contemplated in this Agreement. The Contractor shall invoice the City monthly. The City will pay for the portion of the work described in the invoice that has been completed by the Contractor and approved by the City. The City's payment shall not constitute a waiver of the City's right to final inspection and c acceptance of the project. Card Payment Program. The Contractor may elect to participate in automated credit card payments provided for by the City and its financial institution. This Program is provided as an alternative to payment .. r by check and is available for the convenience of the Contractor. If the Contractor voluntarily participates in this Program, the Contractor will be solely responsible for any fees imposed by financial institutions or E credit card companies. The Contractor shall not charge those fees back to the City. Q PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 1 (Over$20K with Performance Bond) Packet Pg. 272 8.D.a A. Payment and Performance Bond. Pursuant to Chapter 39.08 RCW, the Contractor, shall provide the City a payment and performance bond for the full contract amount. B. Retainage. The City shall hold back a retainage in the amount of five percent (5%) of any and all payments made to the Contractor for a period of sixty (60) days after °r the date of final acceptance, or until receipt of all necessary releases from the State Department of Revenue, the State Department of Labor & Industries, and the State v Employment Security Department, and until settlement of any liens filed under .E Chapter 60.28 RCW, whichever is later. The amount retained shall be placed in a E- fund by the City pursuant to RCW 60.28.011(4)(a), unless otherwise instructed by the Contractor within fourteen (14) calendar days of the Contractor's signature on v the Agreement. r C. Defective or Unauthorized Work. The City reserves its right to withhold payment from the Contractor for any defective or unauthorized work. Defective or unauthorized work includes, without limitation: work and materials that do not LM conform to the requirements of this Agreement; and extra work and materials a furnished without the City's written approval. If the Contractor is unable, for any reason, to satisfactorily complete any portion of the work, the City may complete the L- work by contract or otherwise, and the Contractor shall be liable to the City for any a additional costs incurred by the City. "Additional costs" shall mean all reasonable m costs, including legal costs and attorney fees, incurred by the City beyond the ii maximum Contract price specified above. The City further reserves its right to ° deduct the cost to complete the Contract work, including any Additional Costs, from any and all amounts due or to become due the Contractor. a' � D. Final Payment: Waiver of Claims. THE CONTRACTOR'S ACCEPTANCE OF FINAL � a� PAYMENT (EXCLUDING WITHHELD RETAINAGE) SHALL CONSTITUTE A WAIVER OF Q CONTRACTOR'S CLAIMS, EXCEPT THOSE PREVIOUSLY AND PROPERLY MADE AND c IDENTIFIED BY CONTRACTOR AS UNSETTLED AT THE TIME FINAL PAYMENT IS MADE i AND ACCEPTED. IV. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The parties intend that an Independent Contractor- x Employer Relationship will be created by this Agreement. By their execution of this Agreement, and in w accordance with Ch. 51.08 RCW, the parties make the following representations: A. The Contractor has the ability to control and direct the performance and details of its a work, the City being interested only in the results obtained under this Agreement. :3 E L B. The Contractor maintains and pays for its own place of business from which the Q Contractor's services under this Agreement will be performed. L U- C. The Contractor has an established and independent business that is eligible for a business deduction for federal income tax purposes that existed before the City c retained the Contractor's services and is a service other than that furnished by the v City, or the Contractor is engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession, or business of the same nature as that involved under this Agreement. m D. The Contractor is responsible for filing as they become due all necessary tax a documents with appropriate federal and state agencies, including the Internal v Revenue Service and the state Department of Revenue. r E. The Contractor has registered its business and established an account with the state Department of Revenue and other state agencies as may be required by the E Contractor's business, and has obtained a Unified Business Identifier (UBI) number 0 from the State of Washington. a PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 2 (Over$20K with Performance Bond) Packet Pg. 273 8.D.a F. The Contractor has a valid contractor registration pursuant to Ch. 18.27 RCW or an electrical contractor license pursuant to Ch. 19.28 RCW. G. The Contractor maintains a set of books dedicated to the expenses and earnings of , its business. r c as V. TERMINATION. The City may terminate this Agreement for good cause. "Good cause" U shall include, without limitation, any one or more of the following events: c A. The Contractor's refusal or failure to supply a sufficient number of properly skilled workers or proper materials for completion of the Contract work. U B. The Contractor's failure to complete the work within the time specified in this r Agreement. a� C. The Contractor's failure to make full and prompt payment to subcontractors or for material or labor. a D. The Contractor's persistent disregard of federal, state or local laws, rules or E regulations. a m L E. The Contractor's filing for bankruptcy or becoming adjudged bankrupt. ii L O F. The Contractor's breach of any portion of this Agreement. m If the City terminates this Agreement for good cause, the Contractor shall not receive any further money due under this Agreement until the Contract work is completed. After termination, the City may take possession of all records and data within the Contractor's possession pertaining to this project which a may be used by the City without restriction. o r ti VI. PREVAILING WAGES. The Contractor shall file a "Statement of Intent to Pay Prevailing Wages," with the State of Washington Department of Labor & Industries prior to commencing the Contract work. The Contractor shall pay prevailing wages in effect on the date the bid is accepted or executed by x the Contractor, and comply with Chapter 39.12 of the Revised Code of Washington, as well as any other w applicable prevailing wage rate provisions. The latest prevailing wage rate revision issued by the Department of Labor and Industries is attached. VII. CHANGES. The City may issue a written change order for any change in the Contract work :3 during the performance of this Agreement. If the Contractor determines, for any reason, that a change E order is necessary, the Contractor must submit a written change order request to the person listed in the notice provision section of this Agreement, Section XVI(D), within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date the Contractor knew or should have known of the facts and events giving rise to the requested change. If the City determines that the change increases or decreases the Contractor's costs or time for performance, the City will make an equitable adjustment. The City will attempt, in good faith, to reach c agreement with the Contractor on all equitable adjustments. However, if the parties are unable to agree, v the City will determine the equitable adjustment as it deems appropriate. The Contractor shall proceed @ with the change order work upon receiving either a written change order from the City or an oral order 'E from the City before actually receiving the written change order. If the Contractor fails to require a change order within the time specified in this paragraph, the Contractor waives its right to make any claim a. or submit subsequent change order requests for that portion of the contract work. If the Contractor 9 disagrees with the equitable adjustment, the Contractor must complete the change order work; however, the Contractor may elect to protest the adjustment as provided in subsections A through E of Section IX, .. r Claims, below. E The Contractor accepts all requirements of a change order by: (1) endorsing it, (2) writing a u separate acceptance, or (3) not protesting in the way this section provides. A change order that is a accepted by the Contractor as provided in this section shall constitute full payment and final settlement of PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 3 (Over$20K with Performance Bond) Packet Pg. 274 8.D.a all claims for contract time and for direct, indirect and consequential costs, including costs of delays related to any work, either covered or affected by the change. VIII. FORCE MA7EURE. Neither party shall be liable to the other for breach due to delay or failure in performance resulting from acts of God, acts of war or of the public enemy, riots, pandemic, fire, °r flood, or other natural disaster or acts of government ('force majeure event"). Performance that is prevented or delayed due to a force majeure event shall not result in liability to the delayed party. Both v parties represent to the other that at the time of signing this Agreement, they are able to perform as required and their performance will not be prevented, hindered, or delayed by the current COVID-19 pandemic, any existing state or national declarations of emergency, or any current social distancing restrictions or personal protective equipment requirements that may be required under federal, state, or v local law in response to the current pandemic. If any future performance is prevented or delayed by a force majeure event, the party whose o performance is prevented or delayed shall promptly notify the other party of the existence and nature of a the force majeure event causing the prevention or delay in performance. Any excuse from liability shall be mo effective only to the extent and duration of the force majeure event causing the prevention or delay in a performance and, provided, that the party prevented or delayed has not caused such event to occur and continues to use diligent, good faith efforts to avoid the effects of such event and to perform the E obligation. f° a m Notwithstanding other provisions of this section, the Contractor shall not be entitled to, and the City shall not be liable for, the payment of any part of the contract price during a force majeure event, or `o any costs, losses, expenses, damages, or delay costs incurred by the Contractor due to a force majeure r event. Performance that is more costly due to a force majeure event is not included within the scope of this Force Majeure provision. aEi a� L If a force majeure event occurs, the City may direct the Contractor to restart any work or a performance that may have ceased, to change the work, or to take other action to secure the work or the project site during the force majeure event. The cost to restart, change, or secure the work or project site arising from a direction by the City under this clause will be dealt with as a change order, except to the extent that the loss or damage has been caused or exacerbated by the failure of the Contractor to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement. Except as expressly contemplated by this section, all other costs will be borne by the Contractor, w uy IX. CLAIMS. If the Contractor disagrees with anything required by a change order, another written order, or an oral order from the City, including any direction, instruction, interpretation, or determination by the City, the Contractor may file a claim as provided in this section. The Contractor shall give written notice to the City of all claims within fourteen (14) calendar days of the occurrence of the E events giving rise to the claims, or within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date the Contractor knew or - should have known of the facts or events giving rise to the claim, whichever occurs first . Any claim for Q damages, additional payment for any reason, or extension of time, whether under this Agreement or ;v otherwise, shall be conclusively deemed to have been waived by the Contractor unless a timely written L claim is made in strict accordance with the applicable provisions of this Agreement. c m At a minimum, a Contractor's written claim shall include the information set forth in subsections A, v items 1 through 5 below. c m FAILURE TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE, WRITTEN NOTIFICATION OF CLAIM WITHIN c THE TIME ALLOWED SHALL BE AN ABSOLUTE WAIVER OF ANY CLAIMS ARISING IN ANY WAY FROM THE FACTS OR EVENTS SURROUNDING THAT CLAIM OR CAUSED BY THAT DELAY. U- r c A. Notice of Claim. Provide a signed written notice of claim that provides the following information: 1. The date of the Contractor's claim; a 2. The nature and circumstances that caused the claim; PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 4 (Over$20K with Performance Bond) Packet Pg. 275 8.D.a 3. The provisions in this Agreement that support the claim; 4. The estimated dollar cost, if any, of the claimed work and how that estimate was determined; and 5. An analysis of the progress schedule showing the schedule change or , disruption if the Contractor is asserting a schedule change or disruption. °r c m B. Records. The Contractor shall keep complete records of extra costs and time incurred as a v result of the asserted events giving rise to the claim. The City shall have access to any of .� the Contractor's records needed for evaluating the protest. c The City will evaluate all claims, provided the procedures in this section are followed. If the v City determines that a claim is valid, the City will adjust payment for work or time by an equitable adjustment. No adjustment will be made for an invalid protest. r C. Contractor's Duty to Complete Protested Work. In spite of any claim, the Contractor shall proceed promptly to provide the goods, materials and services required by the City under LM this Agreement. a D. Failure to Protest Constitutes Waiver. By not protesting as this section provides, the L_ Contractor also waives any additional entitlement and accepts from the City any written or a oral order (including directions, instructions, interpretations, and determination). m ii E. Failure to Follow Procedures Constitutes Waiver. By failing to follow the procedures of this ° section, the Contractor completely waives any claims for protested work and accepts from the City any written or oral order (including directions, instructions, interpretations, and determination). a, a� L X. LIMITATION OF ACTIONS. CONTRACTOR MUST, IN ANY EVENT, FILE ANY LAWSUIT Q ARISING FROM OR CONNECTED WITH THIS AGREEMENT WITHIN 120 CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE DATE o THE CONTRACT WORK IS COMPLETE OR CONTRACTOR'S ABILITY TO FILE THAT CLAIM OR SUIT SHALL BE i FOREVER BARRED. THIS SECTION FURTHER LIMITS ANY APPLICABLE STATUTORY LIMITATIONS PERIOD. XI. WARRANTY. The Contractor warrants that it will faithfully and satisfactorily perform all x work provided under this Agreement in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. The Contractor w shall promptly correct all defects in workmanship and materials: (1) when the Contractor knows or should have known of the defect, or (2) upon the Contractor's receipt of notification from the City of the existence or discovery of the defect. In the event any parts are repaired or replaced, only original a replacement parts shall be used—rebuilt or used parts will not be acceptable. When defects are corrected, � the warranty for that portion of the work shall extend for an additional year beyond the original warranty E period applicable to the overall work. The Contractor shall begin to correct any defects within seven (7) Q calendar days of its receipt of notice from the City of the defect. If the Contractor does not accomplish the corrections within a reasonable time as determined by the City, the City may complete the corrections and the Contractor shall pay all costs incurred by the City in order to accomplish the correction. r c XII. DISCRIMINATION. In the hiring of employees for the performance of work under this v Agreement or any sub-contract, the Contractor, its sub-contractors, or any person acting on behalf of the Contractor or sub-contractor shall not, by reason of race, religion, color, sex, age, sexual orientation, national origin, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability, discriminate against any c person who is qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates. The Contractor shall execute the attached City of Kent Non-Discrimination Policy Declaration and comply with v City Administrative Policy 1.2. r XIII. INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or E suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the Contractor's 5 performance of this Agreement, except for that portion of the injuries and damages caused by the City's a negligence. PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 5 (Over$20K with Performance Bond) Packet Pg. 276 8.D.a The City's inspection or acceptance of any of the Contractor's work when completed shall not be grounds to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to °r property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Contractor and the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers, the Contractor's duty to defend, indemnify, and hold the City v harmless, and the Contractor's liability accruing from that obligation shall be only to the extent of the Contractor's negligence. c IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE INDEMNIFICATION L) PROVIDED HEREIN CONSTITUTES THE CONTRACTOR'S WAIVER OF IMMUNITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL a� INSURANCE, TITLE 51 RCW, SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS INDEMNIFICATION. THE PARTIES r FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED THIS WAIVER. a� In the event the Contractor refuses tender of defense in any suit or any claim, if that tender was made pursuant to this indemnification clause, and if that refusal is subsequently determined by a court a having jurisdiction (or other agreed tribunal) to have been a wrongful refusal on the Contractor's part, then the Contractor shall pay all the City's costs for defense, including all reasonable expert witness fees E and reasonable attorneys' fees, plus the City's legal costs and fees incurred because there was a wrongful a refusal on the Contractor's part. m ii The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. ° r c XIV. INSURANCE. The Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance of the types and in the amounts described in Exhibit B attached and incorporated by this reference. L a� Q XV. WORK PERFORMED AT CONTRACTOR'S RISK. The Contractor shall take all necessary o precautions and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and subcontractors in the M performance of the contract work and shall utilize all protection necessary for that purpose. All work shall be done at the Contractor's own risk, and the Contractor shall be responsible for any loss of or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in connection with the work. x w XVI. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. R A. Recyclable Materials. Pursuant to Chapter 3.80 of the Kent City Code, the City requires its a contractors and consultants to use recycled and recyclable products whenever practicable. A price � preference may be available for any designated recycled product. E B. Non-Waiver of Breach. The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, or to exercise any option conferred by this Agreement in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of those covenants, agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect. c m U C. Resolution of Disputes and Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. If the parties are unable to settle any dispute, difference or claim arising from the parties' performance of this Agreement, the exclusive means c of resolving that dispute, difference or claim, shall only be by filing suit exclusively under the venue, rules � and jurisdiction of the King County Superior Court, King County, Washington, unless the parties agree in writing to an alternative dispute resolution process. In any claim or lawsuit for damages arising from the Q parties' performance of this Agreement, each party shall pay all its legal costs and attorney's fees incurred U- r in defending or bringing such claim or lawsuit, including all appeals, in addition to any other recovery or award provided by law; provided, however, nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit the City's E right to indemnification under Section XIII of this Agreement. D. Written Notice. All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the parties at Q the addresses listed on the signature page of the Agreement, unless notified to the contrary. Any written PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 6 (Over$20K with Performance Bond) Packet Pg. 277 8.D.a notice hereunder shall become effective three (3) business days after the date of mailing by registered or certified mail, and shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing. E. Assignment. Any assignment of this Agreement by either party without the written consent °r of the non-assigning party shall be void. If the non-assigning party gives its consent to any assignment, the terms of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and no further assignment shall be U made without additional written consent. c F. Modification. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions of this a) Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the City v and the Contractor. r G. Entire Agreement. The written provisions and terms of this Agreement, together with any Exhibits attached hereto, shall supersede all prior verbal statements of any officer or other representative of the City, and such statements shall not be effective or be construed as entering into or forming a part of or altering in any manner this Agreement. All of the above documents are hereby made a part of this a Agreement. However, should any language in any of the Exhibits to this Agreement conflict with any language contained in this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. E a a H. Compliance with Laws. The Contractor agrees to comply with all federal, state, and m municipal laws, rules, and regulations that are now effective or in the future become applicable to the ii Contractor's business, equipment, and personnel engaged in operations covered by this Agreement or ° accruing out of the performance of those operations. m I. Public Records Act. The Contractor acknowledges that the City is a public agency subject to the Public Records Act codified in Chapter 42.56 of the Revised Code of Washington and documents, notes, emails, and other records prepared or gathered by the Contractor in its performance of this a Agreement may be subject to public review and disclosure, even if those records are not produced to or o possessed by the City of Kent. As such, the Contractor agrees to cooperate fully with the City in satisfying i the City's duties and obligations under the Public Records Act. J. City Business License Required. Prior to commencing the tasks described in Section I, the x Contractor agrees to provide proof of a current city of Kent business license pursuant to Chapter 5.01 of w the Kent City Code. L Q E L a L L r U c c d U U a U_ E a PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 7 (Over$20K with Performance Bond) Packet Pg. 278 8.D.a K. Counterparts and Signatures by Fax or Email. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, and all of which will together constitute this one Agreement. Further, upon executing this Agreement, either party may deliver the signature page to the other by fax or email and that signature shall have the same force and effect as if the Agreement bearing the original signature was received in person. , c m IN WITNESS, the parties below execute this Agreement, which shall become effective on U the last date entered below. All acts consistent with the authority of this Agreement and prior to its effective date are ratified and affirmed, and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to have applied. aD U CONTRACTOR: CITY OF KENT: a� r r By: By: L Print Name: Print Name: Dana Ralph a Its Its Mayor E CU (title) Q DATE: DATE: a� L_ U- L O 4- NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: m E CONTRACTOR: CITY OF KENT: L Pete Cavaliere Will Moore Q Convergint Technologies, LLC 450 Shattuck Ave. So, Suite 100 City of Kent M Renton, WA 98057 220 Fourth Avenue South y Kent, WA 98032 (425) 272-2250(telephone) x pete.cavaliere@convergint.com(email) (253) 856-5081(telephone) w wmoore@kentwa.gov(email) L Q APPROVED AS TO FORM: E L M Q d L Kent Law Department U- L a� r ATTEST: U �a .F c m Kent City Clerk U U a U- r E r a PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 8 (Over$20K with Performance Bond) Packet Pg. 279 8.D.a DECLARATION CITY OF KENT NON-DISCRIMINATION POLICY c The City of Kent (City) is committed to conform to Federal and State laws regarding equal opportunity. As such all contractors, subcontractors, consultants, vendors, and suppliers who perform work with relation to this Agreement shall comply with the regulations of the City's equal employment opportunity policies. a� U The City of Kent and its contractors are subject to and will comply with the following: • Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., 78 stat. N 252), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin); L • 49 C.F.R. Part 21 (entitled Non-discrimination In Federally-Assisted Programs Of The Department Of Transportation-Effectuation Of Title VI Of The Civil E Rights Act Of 1964); f° a a� • 28 C.F.R. section 50.3 (U.S. Department of Justice Guidelines for U_ Enforcement of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964). ,o c • Ch. 49.60 RCW (Washington Law Against Discrimination) E a� a� L The preceding statutory and regulatory cites hereinafter are referred to as "the Acts and a Regulations". M The following statements specifically identify the requirements the City deems necessary for any contractor, subcontractor, or supplier on this specific Agreement to adhere to. An affirmation of E all of the following is required for this Agreement to be valid and binding. If any contractor, w subcontractor, or supplier willfully misrepresents themselves with regard to the directives a outlined below, it will be considered a breach of contract and it will be at the City's sole 2 determination regarding suspension or termination for all or part of the Agreement. a The statements are as follows: E a 1. I have read the attached City of Kent administrative policy number 1.2. i_ L 2. During the time of this Agreement I will not discriminate in employment on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, age, or the presence of all sensory, mental or physical disability. .E c 3. During the time of this Agreement I, the prime contractor, will provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer. Q U_ 4. During the time of the Agreement I, the prime contractor, will actively consider hiring and promotion of women and minorities. E 5. During the performance of this contract, the contractor, for itself, its assignees, and successors in interest (hereinafter referred to as the "contractor") agrees as follows: a EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 1 Packet Pg. 280 8.D.a A. Compliance with Regulations: The contractor, subcontractor, consultant, vendor, and supplier (hereinafter "Contractor") will comply with all Acts and the Regulations relative to non-discrimination, including those applicable to Federally- assisted programs of the U.S. Department of Transportation, State-assisted L programs through the Washington State Department of Transportation, and generally under Washington's Law Against Discrimination, Ch. 49.60 RCW, as they may be amended from time to time, which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract. B. Non-discrimination: The contractor, with regard to the work performed by it during the contract, will not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment. The contractor will not participate directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by the Acts and the Regulations, including employment practices when the contract covers any activity, project, or program set forth in Appendix B of 49 CFR Part 21. E L C. Solicitations for Subcontracts, Including Procurements of Materials and a Equipment: In all solicitations, either by competitive bidding, or negotiation made ;v by the contractor for work to be performed under a subcontract, including i_ L procurements of materials, or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor or 0 supplier will be notified by the contractor of the contractor's obligations under this contract and the Acts and the Regulations relative to non-discrimination on the E grounds of race, color, or national origin. a� a D. Information and Reports: The contractor will provide all information and reports o required by the Acts and Regulations and directives issued pursuant thereto and will M permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined applicable to contractor's contract by the City or the Washington State Department of Transportation to be pertinent to ascertain w compliance with such Acts and Regulations and instructions. Where any information � required of a contractor is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish the information, the contractor will so certify to the City or the Washington State Department of Transportation, as appropriate, and will set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information. E L E. Sanctions for Noncompliance: In the event of a contractor's noncompliance with the non-discrimination provisions of this contract, the City will impose such contract sanctions as it or the Washington State Department of Transportation may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to: U a. withholding payments to the contractor under the contract until the contractor complies; and/or a b. cancelling, terminating, or suspending a contract, in whole or in part. U F. Incorporation of Provisions: The contractor will include the provisions of paragraphs (A) through (F) above in every subcontract, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Acts and Regulations and directives issued pursuant thereto. The contractor will take action with respect to any subcontract or procurement as the City or the Washington State Department of Transportation may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including a sanctions for noncompliance. Provided, that if the contractor becomes involved in, EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 2 Packet Pg. 281 8.D.a or is threatened with litigation by a subcontractor, or supplier because of such direction, the contractor may request the City to enter into any litigation to protect the interests of the City. In addition, the contractor may request the United States to enter into the litigation to protect the interests of the United States. a� c 6. During the performance of this contract, the contractor, for itself, its assignees, and successors in interest agrees to comply with the following non-discrimination statutes and authorities; including but not limited to: a� U Pertinent Non-Discrimination Authorities: a� r i. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252), N (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin); and 49 CFR L Part 21. a ii. The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, (42 U.S.C. § 4601), (prohibits unfair treatment of persons displaced or whose property has been acquired because of Federal or Federal-aid programs and projects); U_ iii. Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973, (23 U.S.C. § 324 et seq.), (prohibits ,o discrimination on the basis of sex); iv. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq.), as E amended, (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability); and 49 CFR Part 27; V. The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, (42 U.S.C. § 6101 et seq.), a (prohibits discrimination on the basis of age); ti vi. Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, (49 USC § 471, Section 47123), as amended, (prohibits discrimination based on race, creed, color, national origin, or sex); x vii. The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, (PL 100-209), (Broadened the scope, N a� coverage and applicability of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by a expanding the definition of the terms "programs or activities" to include all of the programs or activities of the Federal-aid recipients, sub-recipients and contractors, a whether such programs or activities are Federally funded or not); Q viii. Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibit discrimination U_ on the basis of disability in the operation of public entities, public and private transportation systems, places of public accommodation, and certain testing entities (42 U.S.C. §§ 12131-12189) as implemented by Department of Transportation m regulations at 49 C.F.R. parts 37 and 38; a� ix. The Federal Aviation Administration's Non-discrimination statute (49 U.S.C. § c (D 47123) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, and U sex); Q U_ X. Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in c Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, which ensures Non- discrimination against minority populations by discouraging programs, policies, and activities with disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental Q effects on minority and low-income populations; EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 3 Packet Pg. 282 8.D.a xi. Executive Order 13166, Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency, and resulting agency guidance, national origin discrimination includes discrimination because of Limited English proficiency (LEP). To ensure compliance with Title VI, you must take reasonable steps to ensure that LEP (D persons have meaningful access to your programs (70 Fed. Reg. at 74087 to U 74100); xii. Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, which prohibits you from discriminating because of sex in education programs or activities (20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq). ci xiii. Washington Law Against Discrimination (Ch. 49.60 RCW) r 7. The submission of the final invoice for this contract will constitute a reaffirmation that the preceding statements were complied with during the course of the contract's performance. L Q By signing below, I agree to fulfill the five requirements referenced above. E L R a By: L U- L For: .° r c as Title: E a� a� L Date: a 0 r ti M r t X W N d R L Q E L M Q d L U- L U �a c m c a� U U a U- r E r a EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 4 Packet Pg. 283 8.D.a CITY OF KENT ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY as NUMBER: 1.2 EFFECTIVE DATE: October 20, 2022 U .E c as c as U SUBJECT: INCLUSIVE CONTRACTING SUPERSEDES: January 1, 1998 r APPROVED BY Dana Ralph, Mayor POLICY: a� Q. Equal employment opportunity and non-discrimination in contracting requirements for the City of E Kent will conform to federal and state laws. All contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and a suppliers of the City must guarantee equal employment opportunity within their organization ;v and, if holding Agreements with the City amounting to $10,000 or more within any given year, i_ must take the following affirmative steps: ,0 c 1. Provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating E commitment as an equal opportunity employer. a a� a 2. Actively consider for promotion and advancement available minorities and women. o r ti Further, all contractors, subcontractors, consultants, suppliers, grantees, or subgrantees of the City, regardless of the value of the Agreement, are required to sign the City's Non-Discrimination Policy Declaration, prior to commencing performance. x w Any contractor, subcontractor, consultant or supplier who willfully disregards the City's nondiscrimination and equal opportunity requirements shall be considered in breach of contract a� and subject to suspension or termination for all or part of the Agreement. E Contract Compliance Officers will be appointed by the Directors of Planning, Parks, and Public c Works Departments to coordinate with the City's Title VI coordinator, and perform the following duties for their respective departments. L 1. Ensuring that contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and suppliers subject to these regulations are familiar with the regulations and the City's equal employment opportunity L) policy. .E c a� 2. Monitoring to assure adherence to federal, state and local laws, policies and guidelines. U U a U_ E a EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 5 Packet Pg. 284 8.D.a BIDDER RESPONSIBILITY CRITERIA Certification of Compliance with Wage Payment Statutes as c This certification is required by state law (RCW 39.04.350(2)) to be submitted to the City U before the contract can be awarded. a� U The bidder hereby certifies that, within the three-year period immediately preceding the bid solicitation date (9/14/2023), the bidder is not a "willful" violator, as defined in RCW 49.48.082, of any provision of chapters 49.46, 49.48, or 49.52 RCW, as determined by a final and binding citation and notice of assessment issued by the Department of Labor and Industries or through a 2 civil judgment entered by a court of limited or general jurisdiction. E L I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is a true and correct. L_ U_ Convergint Technologies, LLC ,o c a� E a� a� L By. Signature of Authorized Official* a 0 r ti Printed Name: Title: x w Date: a L City and State: a *If a corporation, proposal must be executed in the corporate name by the president or vice- E president (or any other corporate officer accompanied by evidence of authority to sign). If a co- Q partnership, proposal must be executed by a partner. i_ L r U c c d U U a E a BIDDER RESPONSIBILITY CRITERIA - 1 Packet Pg. 285 Exhibit A convergint Convergint , 450 Shattuck Avenue S, Suite 100 r Renton, Washington 98057 Phone (425)272-2250 U www.convergint.com c FIRE ALARM PROPOSAL Date: September 14, 2023 Quotation #: PC04605293P o as To: City of Kent Project: City of Kent 2 Nathan Harper Centennial Center a O: 206.472.2299 EST2-EST4 E: nharper(a)kentwa.gov Panel & Building FA Upgrade E a From: Pete Cavaliere L pete.cavaliere@convergint.com U- 206.483.5490 ,o r c We are pleased to provide this proposal for your consideration. All equipment is warranted for ONE (1) E year unless otherwise specified, against all defects in material and workmanship. This quotation is firm for SIXTY (60) days, and the price is based upon a material order date for equipment delivery within Q THREE (3) months of the acceptance of this proposal. Equipment delivery is subject to current inventory levels and supply chain encumbrances outside of our control. Our terms are net-30 based on monthly o progress billings unless specifically negotiated otherwise. M *Quote is subject to future price increases that fall outside this time frame. All efforts will be made to update the quote to current pricing levels once a price increase is pending.A new quote must be obtained after the sixty(60) day time period. w m R L SCOPE OF WORK � E Convergint Technologies has prepared this proposal to upgrade an existing Edwards EST-2 c fire alarm panel to an Edwards EST-4 fire alarm panel. Q as L This proposal is to replace the existing addressable Edwards EST-2 fire alarm panel and remote annunciator with an addressable Edwards EST-4 fire alarm panel and remote annunciator. With the fire panel upgrade the building fire alarm system will also be upgraded to meet current code. The City of Kent has designed and approved the spec build of the fire alarm system for the Centennial Building. Convergint's price is derived from the bid package/drawings supplied by the City of Kent. With the fire alarm building upgrade Convergint will upgrade notification and pull station coverage throughout the building. With the notification upgrade we will need to install two (2) new booster power supplies, one (1) in the first floor electrical room and one (1) in the fourth floor electrical room. The intent is for the booster power supply on the first floor to control notification on floors one and two. The booster power r supply on the fourth floor will control notification on floors three and four. The existing smoke a detectors, waterflow modules, tamper modules, elevator recall, and any duct detector, AHU E control interface will remain as is and will tie into the new EST-4 fire panel. a Packet Pg. 286 8.D.a convergint Convergint will work with our electrical partner to remove the existing fire alarm panel/remote annunciator and install the new fire alarm panel/remote annunciator along with all device upgrades throughout the building. All field wiring and specified field devices will remain as they are compatible with the EST-4 fire panel. Our proposal will include material, electrical, installation, programming, drawings, engineering, 100% pre-testing, and 100% testing with Kent Fire. All work and testing are to be during normal business hours, this includes panel replacement, field devices, annunciator replacement, programming, pre-testing devices & notification, and final testing with Kent Fire. The City of Kent will cover the cost of permitting fees and testing with Kent Fire fees. r as L Q E L Q d L_ U_ L O r E L Q 0 r ti M t K W uY d R L Q E L M a L L r U c c d U U a E a Packet Pg. 287 8.D.a converg1 nt PERFORMANCE MATRIX The following checklist is intended to describe the major performance items being provided by Convergint for this project. This checklist is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all c° performance items. c YES NO PERFORMANCE ITEM YES NO PERFORMANCE ITEM ci N ❑ Material (listed in the BOM) N ❑ Wire N ❑ Freight (prepaid) N ❑ Installation of Wire M N ❑ FA Permit and Plan N ❑ Installation of Conduit, Boxes Review. Fees covered by and Fittings the City of Kent a ❑ N Sales Tax ❑ N Installation of Bridal Rings n ® ❑ Electrical Installation Permit N E] Mounting/Termination of E Proposed Devices ' a N ❑ System Engineering N ❑ Terminal Cabinets N El Drawings N El Installation of Terminal Cabinets c N ❑ System Programming N ❑ Installation of Power Supplies c N ❑ Testing of all Proposed Devices N ❑ Termination of Power Supplies E N ❑ One Year Warranty on Parts N ❑ Specialty Backboxes i ❑X ❑ One Year Warranty on Labor ❑ N Installation of Specialty Q Backboxes N ❑ Owner Training N ❑ Control Equipment Enclosures N ❑ Record (as-built) Documentation N ❑ Installation of Control Equipment Enclosures N ❑ O&M Manuals N ❑ Termination of Control Equipment Enclosures 2 w N ❑ System is Code Compliant ❑ N Patch and Paint N ElSystem is Spec-Build El Fire Watch ;° a� N ❑ Work Completed M-F 7am to ❑ N Firestopping (excluding existing 4pm penetrations) E ❑ N Correction of Wiring Faults ❑ N 120VAC Power and Fused a Caused by Others Disconnect Switch Q Notes: Proposed devices include all notification, detection, modules, and UIO motherboards. Control equipment enclosures are any cabinet containing a CPU. t� .E c as c as c.� U Q c E t c� .r Q Packet Pg. 288 8.D.a converg1 nt BILL OF MATERIALS L The following bill of materials is intended to describe the scope of work & equipment provided by Convergint for this project by identifying major device and panel quantities. This bill of material is c° not intended to be a comprehensive list of all fire alarm system parts, components, or accessories. c Fire Alarm 0 Line# Quantity Part Number Description 1 EST4 FACP #1 0 2 1.00 3-CAB14B Backbox, 2 Chassis Space 3 1.00 4-CAB24DR Door Assembly, 24 Space, Red, Edwards 2 4 1.00 3-CHAS7 Chassis Assembly 0. 5 1.00 4-CPU Central Processor Module, Edwards -- Fire panel E network node count: 1 v 6 1.00 4-LCDLE Display, Main LCD Module for 4-8ANNMT, 4- a 16ANNMT, 4-24ANNMT and 3-CABxB, Edwards U. 7 1.00 4-241-12S Control Display Module, 24 LED/12 Switch, Edwards `o 8 1.00 4-PPS/M Primary Power Supply c 9 1.00 3-MODCOM Modem Communicator 10 1.00 3-SSDC2 Single Data Circuit Module L 11 1.00 4-NET-TP SFP Network Controller, 2Mbps Shared TX/RX, Twisted PairCD Q 12 2.00 PW-PS12180F2 12V 18AH SLA BATTERY F2 ti 13 OTHER ANNUNCIATORS AND EQUIPMENT 14 1.00 4-2ANN LCD Annunciator, Bronze, Edwards 15 1.00 4-2ANNMT Annunciator Backbox, 2 Space, Black, Edwards 16 1.00 4-NET-TP SFP Network Controller, 2Mbps Shared TX/RX, y Twisted Pair 17 1.00 SS000625 ACERBOX DSB DRAWING STORAGE BOX, 36, (SIZE 6X37), 4 DIA, RED 18 POWER SUPPLIES 19 2.00 BPS6A 6.5 Amp Booster Power Supply a 20 4.00 PW-PS1270F2 12V 7AH SLA BATTERY F2 a as 21 FIELD DEVICES 22 10.00 SIGA-278 Double Action Pull Station 23 10.00 STI-1100 STPPR II W/HRN FLUSH MOUNT RED STOPPER a I I v 24 1.00 SIGA-OSD Photo Smoke Detector, Optica c 25 1.00 SIGA-SB4 Standard Base w/Trim Skirt 26 FIELD MODULES v 27 2.00 SIGA-CC1 S SIGA-CC1 w/Strobe Sync 28 4.00 SIGA-IM2 Isolator Module U- 29 8.00 EOL-15 15K EOL Resistor (P260003) 30 2.00 EOL-47 EOL RESISTOR, 47K, 1/2 W E 31 NOTIFICATION 32 19.00 G4AVWN Wall, Temporal H/S MCd, White a Packet Pg. 289 8.D.a converg1 nt 33 104.00 GCAVWN Ceiling Temporal H/S MCd, White , 34 13.00 GRSW-10 Room Side Wiring Plate, 10 Pack r c a� U BASIS This proposal is based upon the information provided to Convergint. Therefore, please carefully review this "Bid Qualification" section and verify any additional service and equipment related to this proposal and the provision of a complete and operating system. a� r Spec Section: Section Name(s): Drawing Date: NA Drawing Sheets: 28 Addendums: Schedule- Other/ General: E Project is design-build based upon City of Kent - Spec Build a L GENERAL CLARIFICATIONS L 1. Electronic ACAD files shall be provided to Convergint for use in creating submittal drawings E at no additional cost. 2. Proposal includes an Edwards System Technologies (EST) EST4 addressable fire alarm Q system including panels, devices, engineering, programming, startup, and testing as defined in the scope of work. 3. Proposal is provided in accordance with the attached Terms & Conditions. Project-specific M Terms & Conditions are subject to mutually agreeable negotiations. r 4. All existing devices are assumed in good working order and compatible with the EST4 Z upgrade. w 5. Please note a minimum 15% project implementation invoice will be sent upon project booking. This covers admin contract execution, PM booking process, contract drawings submitted to design. This invoice may be adjusted if equipment is released at booking. Mobilization will be invoice separately as project progresses. E L STANDARD EXCLUSIONS a L 1. Provision or installation of conduit,wire, boxes,fittings, or other electrical installation materials unless listed explicitly under Inclusions or Bill of Materials. 2. Provision and/or installation of combination fire-smoke dampers, smoke dampers, fire v dampers, door holders, door hardware, elevator shunt trip, fire sprinkler systems, sprinkler monitoring switches and/or pre-action systems. 3. Provision or installation of telephone lines for monitoring of the fire alarm system. 4. Monthly fire alarm monitoring fees. W 5. Sales Tax. U a U_ r E r a Packet Pg. 290 8.D.a convergint COVID-19 IMPACTS U The impacts of COVID-19 cannot be reasonably determined at this time. Accordingly, this quote/proposal does not account for any potential adverse effects COVID-19 may have on Convergint's performance or obligations herein. In the event of any delays or negative impacts, Convergint reserves the right for equitable adjustment(s) of the delivery schedule and prices U herein to offset the effects of COVID-19 delays, without fault or penalty of any kind. r Customer acknowledges that supply-chain and shipping difficulties may result in unanticipated increases to Convergint in the cost of products covered by this quote or any resulting agreement and that such increases may occur between the time this quote is provided or any resulting contract is a executed and the time when Convergint actually purchases the products covered by this quote or a resulting agreement. Customer agrees that it will pay any such increase in Convergint's actual cost of E obtaining the products above the cost upon which the quote or agreement was based, by change order a or otherwise, and Convergint agrees that it shall make commercially reasonable efforts to minimize any such increase. U_ L O r E L Q 0 r ti M t K W uY d R L Q E L a L LL L r U c c d U U a E V a Packet Pg. 291 8.D.a convergint PROJECT INVESTMENT L r CONVERGINT BASE FIRE ALARM: $ 139,204.00 Thank you for considering our proposal. If you have any questions or would like additional ' c information, please don't hesitate to contact me immediately via phone at 206.483.5490 or email U as at pete.cavaliere@convergint.com. Furthermore, if you would like us to proceed with the scope of r work as outlined in this proposal, please sign below, scan and email. L Sincerely, a E L Pete Cavaliere a as Fire Alarm & Life Safety U- L By signing below, I accept this proposal and agree to the Terms and Conditions Version 1.13 ,0 r dated July 2021. as as L Q 0 r ti M CUSTOMER NAME DATE x w u� m AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME /TITLE L Q E L a L L r U c c d U U a E a Packet Pg. 292 8.D.a converg1 nt C nvergint Technologies'Install Terms&Conditions Version 1.13 July 2021 L Througho t this Installation Proposal,the term,"Convergent"refers to the Convergint Technologies affiliate operating in the state/province in which the work is being performed. 0) ++ SECTION 1.THE WORK C This Installation Proposal takes precedence over and supersedes any and all prior proposals,correspondence,and oral agreements or representations relating to the work set forth in the attached scope of work("Work").This Installation Proposal commences on the Start Date as specked in the attached scope of work and represents the entire agreement between Convergint and Customer(the"Agreement"). V In the event any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable,the remaining provisions of this Agreementshall remain in full force. Convergint agrees in accordance with the mutually agreed project schedule: a. To submitshop drawings,productdata,samplesand similar submittals if required in perforningthe Work; b. To pay for all labor,materials,equipment,tools,supervision,programming,testing,startup and documentation required to perform the Work in accordance with the Agreement; r C. Secure and pay for permits and governmental fees,licenses and inspections necessary for proper execution and completion of the Work,unless local regulations provide otherwise;and d. Hire subcontractors and order material to perform part of the Work,if necessary,while remaining responsible for the completion of theWork. V Customer agrees in accordance with the mutually agreed project schedule,and at no cost to Convergint: a. To promptly approve submittals provided byConvergint; b. To provide access to all areas of the facility which are necessary to complete the Work; +S+ C. To supply suitable electrical service as required by Convergint;and d. That in the event of any emergency or systems failure,reasonable safety precautions will be taken by Customer to protect fife and property during the period of time from when Convergint is first M notified of the emergency or failure and until such time that Convergint notifies the Customerthat the systems are operational or that the emergency has cleared. fn d No monitoring services are included in the Work.Any such services shall be governed by a separate agreement. f. L. Title to the Work,including any materials comprising the Work,shall pass to Customer as the Work is completed and the materials are incorporated into the Work at Customer's site.If materials tM are earlier stored on Customer's site pursuant to agreement between Customer and Convergint,title with respect to such materials shall pass to Customer upon delivery to Customer site. Q' SECTION 2.PRICING Pricing and amounts proposed shall remain valid for 30 days unless otherwise specified.Price includes only the material listed based on Convergint's interpretation of plans and specifications unless noted E otherwise.Additional equipment,unless negotiated prior to order placement,will be billed accordingly.Sales taxes,(and in Canada GST/PST) and any other taxes assessed on Customer shall be added to L the price upon invoicetoCustomer. SECTION 3.INVOICE REMITTANCE AND PAYMENT Q Customer agrees to pay Convergint twenty-five(25%)percent of the total price as a mobilization fee at the time of executing this Agreement. i If the Work is performed over more than a month,Convergint will invoice Customer each month for the Work performed during the previous month.Customer agrees to pay the amount due to Convergint as j L invoiced,within thirty(30)days of the date of such invoice.If the Work is completed in less than one month,Customer agrees to pay Convergint in full after the Work has been performed within thirty(30)days L of the date of being invoiced.Invoices shall not include or be subject to a project retention percentage.If Customer is overdue in any payment to Convergint,Convergint shall be entitled to suspend the Work �O unfil paid,and charge Customer an interest rate 1 and 1/2%percent per month,(or the maximum rate permitted by law,whichever is less),and may avail itself of any other legal or equitable remedy.Customer r+ shall reimburse Convergint costs incurred in collecting any amounts that become overdue,including attorney fees,court costs and any other reasonable expenditure. SECTION 4.WARRANTY Convergint provides the following SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE warranty to the Customer: E For the period of one(1)year,commencing at the earlier of substantial completion of the Work,or first beneficial use,("Warranty Period"): 4) a. That Work performed under this Agreementwill be ofgood quality; i b. That allequipment will be new unless otherwise required or permitted by this Agreement; C. That the Work will be free from defects not inherent in the quality required or permitted;and Q d. That the Work will conform tothe requirements ofthisAgreement. The Customers sole remedy for any breach of this warranty is that Convergint shall remove,replace and/or repair at its own expense any defective or improper Work,discovered within the Warranty Period, CD provided Convergint is notified in writing of any defect within the Warranty Period. ti Any equipment or products installed by Convergint in the course of performing the Work hereunder shall only carry such warranty as is provided by the manufacturer thereof,which Convergint hereby assigns v to Customer without recourse to Convergint.Upon request of Customer,Convergint will use commercially reasonable efforts to assist Customer in enforcing any such third-party warranties.This warranty excludes remedy for damage or defect caused by abuse,modifications not executed by Convergint,improper or insufficient maintenance,improper operation,or normal wear and tear under normal usage. NO FURTHER WARRANTIES OR GUARANTIES,EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,ARE MADE WITH RESPECT TO ANY GOODS OR SERVICES PROVIDED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT,AND ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSEARE ECPRESSLYDISCLAIMED. t SECTION 5.CHANGES K LLJ Without invalidating this Agreement or any bond given hereunder,Customer or Convergint may request changes in the Work.Any changes to the Agreement shall be in writing signed by both Customer and Convergint.If Customer orders any additional work or causes any material interference with Convergint's performance of the Work,Convergint shall be entitled to an equitable adjustment in the time for W performance and in the Agreement Price,including a reasonable allowance for overhead and profit. -a SECTION 6.FORCE MAJEURE <Q L Neither Customer nor Convergent shall be responsible or liable for,shall incur expense for,or be deemed to be in breach of this Agreement because of any delay in the performance of their respective 0) obligations pursuant to this Agreement due solely to circumstances beyond their reasonable control("Force Majeure")and without the fault or negligence of the party experiencing such delay.A Force Majeure CL event shall include,but not be limited to:accident,fire,storm,water,flooding,negligence,vandalism,power failure,installation of incompatible equipment,improper operating procedures,source current M fluctuations or lighting.If performance by either party is delayed due to Force Majeure,the time for that performance shall be extended for a period of time reasonably necessary to overcome the effect of the delay.Any Services required by Convergint due to reasons set forth in this Force Majeure Section shall be charged to Customer in addition to any amounts due under this Agreement. L SECTION 7.INSURANCE Convergint shall have the following insurance coverage during the term of this Agreement,and shall provide certificates of insurance to the Customer prior to beginning work hereunder: Q Workers Compensation Statutory Limits Employer's Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence/aggregate Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 peroccurrence/aggregate L $2,000,000 general aggregate LL Automobile Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence/aggregate Excess/Umbrella Liability $10,000,000 peroccurrence/aggregate L Commercial General Liability,Automobile Liability,and Excess/Umbrella Liability policies shall name the Customer as"additional insured"on a pdmary/noncontributory basis,with respect to liability arising out of work performed by Convergint,as applicable,but only to the extent of liabilities falling within the indemnity obligations of Convergint,pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.Convergint shall provide to the C Customer no less than thirty(30)days'notice priorto the termination or cancellation of any such insurance policy. 41 SECTION 8.INDEMNIFICATION V Convergint shall indemnify and hold Customer harmless from and against claims,damages,losses and expenses,attributable to bodily injury,sickness,disease or death,or to destruction of tangible property, M but only to the extent caused by:a)the negligent or willful acts or omissions of Convergint or Convergints employees or subcontractors while on Customer's site,or b)the malfunction of the equipment supplied by Convergint,or c)Convergints breach of this Agreement. IN NO EVENT SHALL EITHER CONVERGINT OR CUSTOMER BE LIABLE TO THE OTHER PARTY HERETO FOR SPECIAL,INDIRECT,INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES,INCLUDING COMMERCIAL LOSS,LOSS OF USE OR LOST PROFITS,EVEN IF THAT PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.IN NO EVENT WILL CONVERGINT BE LIABLE TO CUSTOMER FOR ANY AMOUNTS IN EXCESS OF THE AMOUNTS PAID BY CUSTOMER TO CONVERGINT. N It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that Convergint is or may be providing intrusion products which are designs d to provide notification of certain events but are not intended to be V guarantees or insurers against any acts for which they are supposed to monitor or inform.Convergint's indemnification obliga tion pursuant to Section 8 herein,does not apply to the extent the loss V indemnified against is caused by any intrusion product or software provided by but not manufactured by Convergint.Convergint shall have no liability to Customer for any losses to the extent such losses are caused by the intrusion product or software.Customer shall indemnify,defend,and hold harmless Convergint,from and against all claims,lawsuits,damages,losses and expenses by persons not a party to this Agreement,but only to the extent caused by such intrusion product or software provided by but not manufactured by Convergint. LIL SECTION 9.COMPLIANCE WITH LAW,SAFETY,&HAZARDOUS MATERIALS This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the state/province in which the Work is being performed.Convergint agrees to comply with all laws and regulations relating to or governing its provision of the Work.Convergint shall comply with all safety related laws and regulations and with the safety program of the Customer,provided such program is supplied to Convergint prior to beginningwork. C� In the event that Convergint discovers or suspects the presence of hazardous materials,or unsafe working conditions at Customers facility where the Work is to be performed,Convergint is entitled to stop tC the Work at that facility if such hazardous materials,or unsafe working conditions were not provided by or caused by Convergint.Convergint in its sole discretion shall determine when it is"safe"to return to ram+ perform the Work at Customer's facility.Convergint shall have no responsibility for the discovery,presence,handling,removing or disposal of or exposure of persons to hazardous materials in any form at Q Packet Pg. 293 8.D.a converg1 nt Convergin agree aLiabilities su ere y a it pa y o er an an a i is e o onvergin Other pay ere o. onvergin may assign is greemen o any o is parer s,su idiaries or which are an element of loss subject to indemnification under this paragraph shall be deemed affiliated companies or any entity majority owned by Convergint. direct da ages. Notices shall be in writing and addressed to the other party,in accordance w th the ames and SECTION ie.DISPUTES to 61F to ++ In the event of any dispute between Convergint and Customer,Convergint and Customer shall first whom the notice was sent. attempt to resolve the dispute in the field,but if that is not successful,then in a meeting between A waiver of the terms hereunder by one party to the other party shall not be effective unless in writing V authorized officers of each company.If settlement attempts are not successful,then the dispute and signed by a person with authority to commit the Customer or Convergint and delivered to the shall be decided exclusively by arbitration.Such arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with non-waiving party according to the notice provision herein.No waiver by Customer or Convergint the Construction Industry Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association currently in shall operate as a continuous waiver, unless the written waiver specifically states that it is a effect and shall be a final binding resolution of the issues presented between the parties.The continuous waiver of the terms stated inthatwaiver. prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attomeys'fees and costs. The Sections regarding invoicing,warranty,and indemnity,and disputes shall survive the termination r SECTION 11.MISCELLANEOUS of this Agreement. Neither party to this Agreement shall assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of the V sS N s c� m m L �C G L Q d L_ L O C� G lv CD d L Q r ti M t K W to d R L CL L a L_ L d V ♦d♦ V U Q c t c� .r Q Packet Pg. 294 8.D.a d c m U c a� c m U t r N L KENT E WASHINGTON Q N L_ u- CENTENNIAL CENTER FIRE ALARM UPGRADE ,0 KENT, WA E L CONTRACT # CAG2-23-174 a 0 r ti M t K W u� d R L Q E L a L L r U c c d U U a a Packet Pg. 295 8.D.a 210 VELTRE ENGINEERING, INC. 300 Deschutes mwater,Wash gton1te 98501 1257 VAEFIRE PROTECTION LIFE SAFETY Office:(509)859-2709 Mobile:(509)859-2709 N C d U ELEVATOR AND FIRE SYSTEM KENT, WA Contract # CAG2-23-174 L Q SUBMITTED: E a L_ U- L O r Veltre Engineering, Inc. For E Project No. W2279 a� 400 Q 0 r s• M KENT .� WASH I N G T O N X W City of Kent, WA Facilities I Parks, Recreation and Community Services 400 West Gowe St. Kent, WA 98032 E a L L r U c c d U U a U- E a Packet Pg. 296 8.D.a 210 VELTRE ENGINEERING, INC. 300 D rn ater,Washi gtonhutes Way SW, 1te 98501 1257 VAEFIRE PROTECTION LIFE SAFETY Office:(509)859-2709 Cell:(509)859-2709 N C d U c a� c m U t SECTION A: DESIGN DRAWINGS 4 ------------------------------------------------------------- L Q E L SECTION B: SPECIFICATIONS ---------------------------------------------------------------- 18 a L_ U- L O r E L Q 0 r ti M t K W u� d R L Q E L M a L L r U c c d U U a U- E a Packet Pg. 297 8.D.a 210 VELTRE ENGINEERING, INC. 300 D rn ater,Washi gtonhutes Way SW, 1te 98501 1257 VAEFIRE PROTECTION LIFE SAFETY Office:(509)859-2709 Cell:(509)859-2709 N C d U c a� c m U SECTION A: DESIGN DRAWINGS L Q E L Q d L_ U- L O r E L Q 0 r ti M t K W uy d R L Q E L M a L L r U c c d U U a U- E a Packet Pg. 298 8.D.a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ABBREVIATIONS APPLICABLE CRITERIA GENERAL NOTES PERMIT APPLICATION 4^0*04*0. CENTERLINE KENT & AND WHERE SPECIFIC EDITIONS OF CRITERIA ARE REFERENCED, THESE 1 . ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO REFERENCED NFPA CODES AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS WASMINOTON G @ AT EDITIONS WILL BE UTILIZED UNLESS APPROVED OTHERWISE. WHERE STANDARDS. 0 DIAMETER SPECIFIC EDITIONS OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA ARE NOT REFERENCED, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS MUST BE DESIGNED BY A NICET LEVEL III FIRE f PLUS OR MINUS THE MOST RECENTLY PUBLISHED EDITIONS AVAILABLE AT THE TIME 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL SITE CONDITIONS AND ALARM DESIGNER OR A WASHINGTON STATE LICENSED ENGINEER AND AFF ABOVE FINISH FLOOR OF THE GOVERNMENT'S SOLICITATION FOR PROPOSAL APPLY. DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO MATERIAL FABRICATION, ORDERING, INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ��� WAS X G� DEMO DEMOLISH EXISTING AND/OR CONSTRUCTION. ASSOCIATION STANDARD (NFPA) 72. A CITY OF KENT FIRE ALARM e „ DWG DRAWING SOME KEY CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE DESIGN ARE REFERENCED SYSTEM PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED. EA EACH BELOW: 3. THE BUILDING IS EXISTING, ALL WORK SHOWN IS NEW UNLESS �0 4I 68 w .C> kEISTERR� F FAHRENHEIT NOTED OTHERWISE. A MINIMUM OF THREE SETS OF PLANS AND CUTS SHEETS ARE �ssIONAL FA FIRE ALARM REQUIRED FOR SUBMITTAL. ag22202- FACU FIRE ALARM CONTROL UNIT INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL (ICC) 4. REFER TO EXISTING PLANS FOR A SUMMARY OF EXISTING FP FIRE PROTECTION CONDITIONS. EXISTING CONDITIONS WERE TAKEN FROM RECORD WORKING DRAWINGS - FLOOR PLANS: 0 HR HOUR 0 2018 IBC WITH WA AND KENT AMENDMENTS DRAWINGS AND SELECTIVE FIELD MEASUREMENTS. ACTUAL IBC INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 0 2018 IFC WITH WA AMENDMENTS CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BY THE 1 . IF SMOKE DETECTION IS REQUIRED, PROVIDE REFLECTED IFC INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE 0 2018 IEBC WITH WA AND KENT AMENDMENTS CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO STARTING ANY DEMOLITION OR NEW CEILING PLAN AND FULL-HEIGHT CROSS SECTIONS (NOT LF LINEAR FOOT CONSTRUCTION WORK. ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE MADE BY THE PROVIDED DUE TO HAVING NO NEW SMOKE DETECTORS). F MAX MAXIMUM NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION (NFPA) CONTRACTOR AS REQUIRED BASED ON CONTRACTOR FIELD 2. LOCATION OF ANY FIRE BARRIERS, FIRE WALLS AND STAIRWAY MECH MECHANICAL VERIFICATION. ENCLOSURES. MISC MISCELLANEOUS 0 2018 NFPA 70, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE 3. OCCUPANCY TYPE OF EACH ROOM OR AREA (NOT PROVIDED: MIN MINIMUM 0 2018 NFPA 70E, STANDARD FOR ELECTRICAL SAFETY IN THE 5. THESE DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC IN NATURE AND SHOWN FOR PRIMARY OCCUPANCY FOR BUILDING PROVIDED). NAC NOTIFICATION APPLIANCE CIRCUIT WORKPLACE REFERENCE ONLY. DRAWINGS SHOW APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS. NFPA NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION 0 2016 NFPA 72, NATIONAL FIRE ALARM CODE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE SHOP DRAWINGS AND AS-BUILT SYSTEM INFORMATION: N NR NOT RATED 2013 NFPA 241 , STANDARD FOR SAFEGUARDING RECORD DRAWINGS WHICH ARE ADJUSTED BASED UPON THE z 0 NTS NOT TO SCALE CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION, AND DEMOLITION OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT SELECTED AS FIELD CONDITIONS APPLY. SYSTEM 1 . LEGEND SHOWING ALL SYMBOLS, DEVICE DESCRIPTIONS, SIZE, a OC ON CENTER COMPONENTS NOT SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE THE AND TYPE OF OUTLET BOX AND MOUNTING HEIGHT. PSI POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH RESPONSIBILITY OF THE INSTALLING CONTRACTOR SUCH THAT A 2. MAKE, MODEL, TYPE, AND LOCATION OF ALL FIRE ALARM QTY QUANTITY COMPLETE INSTALLATION IS PROVIDED. o CONTROL PANELS. REQD REQUIRED 3. MAKE MODEL, TYPE AND LOCATION OF ALL INITIATING DEVICES. r_ SF SQUARE FEET 6. REFER TO NEW WORK PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 4. MAKE' MODELCAL , TYPE, AND LOCATION OF ALL NOTIFICATION TYP E NO UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE SCOPE OF WORK 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL IDENTIFY AND LABEL ALL EXISTING CIRCUITS. DEVICES. VAC VOLTS, ALTERNATING CURRENT 5. MAKE, MODEL, TYPE, AND LOCATION OF ALL DOOR CLOSURES, SMOKE DAMPERS, HVAC SHUT-DOWN DEVICES, ELEVATOR VDC VOLTS, DIRECT CURRENT 8. THE 120 VAC POWER SUPPLY AND EXISTING CIRCUITS SHALL BE RECALL DEVICES, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM MONITORING W WIDE/WIDTH THE EXISTING FIRE ALARM PANEL IS BEING REPLACED WITH A NEW RECONNECTED TO THE NEW FACU SO AS TO MAINTAIN THE PANEL PROVIDING A FULL COVERAGE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM. DEVICES OR SIMILAR DEVICES OR EQUIPMENT THAT AFFECT o o ZONES AND FUNCTIONS OF THE EXISTING FACU. REUSE THE z W/ WITH HORN STROBE APPLIANCES SHALL BE PLACED THROUGHOUT EACH BUILDINGS OF FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT SERVICES. z z Q Q WP WEATHERPROOF / EXISTING AES INTELLINET RADIO TO COMMUNICATE WITH THE 6. WIRING DIAGRAM FOR ALL CIRCUITS. DIAGRAM TO IDENTIFY ° o FLOOR IN THE BUILDING WITHIN PUBLIC AND COMMON USE AREAS MONITORING STATION. Q Q AS DEFINED IN THE IBC. THE EXISTING DEVICES SHALL BE LOADS, WIRE SIZE AND LENGTH INCLUDING BATTERY o o of o TRANSFERRED TO THE NEW PANEL USING THE EXISTING CIRCUITS CALCULATIONS. D N `-' z 9. AN EDWARDS EST4 FACU SHALL BE PROVIDED THAT USES co� 0 0 Q AND THE ASSOCIATED FUNCTIONS AND ZONES SHALL BE BOOSTER SUPPLY BOARDS INTEGRAL TO THE PANEL. IT SHALL 7. THE SOURCES OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER. U)co U) U U- MAINTAINED. NEW MANUAL PULL STATIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALSO BE MODULAR AND CAPABLE OF BEING EXPANDED TO 8. LOCATION OF END-OF-LINE RESISTORS. o NEAR THE BUILDING EXITS ON THE FIRST FLOOR AND NEXT TO PROVIDE A NOTIFICATION SYSTEM FOR ALL OCCUPIABLE AREAS OF BOTH STAIRWELLS ON THE SECOND THIRD AND FOURTH FLOOR. FIRE PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIRES THE NAME AND CONTACT E > THE BUILDING. INFORMATION OF THE BUILDING OWNER, CONTRACTOR, AND PROJECT NEW HORNS/STROBES SHALL BE PROVIDED AS A FULL COVERAGE m m o CONTACT AS WELL A DESCRIPTION OF THE SCOPE OF WORK WITH o } w a NOTIFICATION SYSTEM. 10. CONTRACTOR TO IDENTIFY ALL FUNCTIONS PERFORMED BY THE ui z 00 0 AN ESTIMATED VALUATION. z z Y o D EXISTING FACU AND VERIFY THAT ALL OPERATE PROPERLY 9 w BEFORE RELOCATING CIRCUITS TO NEW FACU. w (D 0 0 _ Of U) � N ocD 00 0 Of cnQ� co r 11 . BATTERY CALCULATION SHALL BE BASED ON 24 HRS STAND-BY x W BUILDING DESCRIPTION AND 5 MINUTES FOR ALARM. o N � fC 12. CLASS B SLC AND NOTIFICATION CIRCUITS SHALL BE USED. z � z �' � o Zoo THE CENTENNIAL CENTER, LOCATED AT 400 W. GOWE ST., KENT, Z ; z z o z E WA, IS PART OF THE CITY HALL CAMPUS. THE BUILDING IS 13. SLC FOR EACH FLOOR SHALL BE SEPARATED WITH AN ISOLATION W W R 0 _ MODULE. EACH FLOOR SHALL HAVE SEPARATE NOTIFICATION " w } a a 4-STORIES WITH A TOTAL AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 74,000 SF AND Q o z z Q L EACH STORY APPROXIMATELY 18,500 SF. THE PRIMARY OCCUPANCY CIRCUITS. Z _ � z � Q Www }, CLASSIFICATION IS A GROUP B - BUSINESS. SPRINKLER 14. CABLING INSTALLED IN PLENUM MUST BE LISTED FOR PLENUMS z � w = Q PROTECTION IS PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING. THE W z J EXISTING FIRE ALARM SYSTEM MONITORS THE BUILDING SPRINKLER OR LEAVE TO NFPA 72. SHEET INDEX Y W w `� > o � C WATERFLOW AND TAMPER SWITCHES, WATERFLOW AND TAMPER 15. EXPOSED CABLING CAN BE INSTALLED WHEN ABOVE 7 FT AFF co SWITCH FOR THE SPRINKLERS TO THE ADJACENT BUILDING, SMOKE EXCEPT CABLING TO DEVICES AND APPLIANCES BELOW DROP NUMBER NAME DETECTORS ON ALL FLOORS (ONLY PARTIAL PROTECTION), A SINGLE CEILINGS SHALL BE IN CONDUIT. a MANUAL PULL STATION ON THE FIRST FLOOR (BY THE NORTH F-001 COVER SHEET ENTRANCE), TAMPER SWITCHES ON SPRINKLER VALVES AT THE TOP 16. THE UPDATED COPY OF THE RECORD OF COMPLETION AND OF THE ELEVATOR AND AT THE ELEVATOR PIT, AND TAMPER OTHER DOCUMENTS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A DOCUMENTATION F-101 EXISTING - 1ST FLOOR PLAN SWITCHES ON THE STANDPIPE VALVES ON ALL FLOORS. THE CABINET ADJACENT TO THE FACU IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA EXISTING NOTIFICATION SYSTEM CONSISTS OF A SINGLE 7 7 2 a AUDIBLE/VISUAL APPLIANCE ON THE FIRST FLOOR (BY THE NORTH F-102 EXISTING - 2ND FLOOR PLAN ENTRANCE). 17. SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS, CALCULATIONS, AND PRODUCT DATA SHEETS TO THE DESIGNER OF RECORD (VELTRE ENGINEERING, F-103 EXISTING - 3RD FLOOR PLAN LLJ INC.) FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO SUBMITTING FOR PERMIT. LLJ F-104 EXISTING - 4TH FLOOR PLAN = B C) F-105 FIRE ALARM - 1 ST FLOOR PLAN 0� W F-106 FIRE ALARM - 2ND FLOOR PLAN 0 U F-107 FIRE ALARM - 3RD FLOOR PLAN CIRCUIT LABELS AND DESIGNATORS EXAMPLE: MANUAL PULL STATION F-108 FIRE ALARM -4TH FLOOR PLAN ADDRESSABLE M 001 DEVICE � DESIGNATES DEVICE NUMBER F LABELS T"M" DESIGNATES MODULE F-501 FIRE ALARM DETAILS A CABLE AND WIRE LEGEND F-502 PANEL ELEVATIONS EXAMPLE: STROBE SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SHEET ID DESIGNATES NAC CIRCUIT F-601 RISER DIAGRAM F-001 LABELS NAC CIRCUIT DESIGNATES NUMBER IN CIRCUIT V NAC CIRCUIT N1.02 75cd INDICATES TAPPED CANDELA SETTING A SIGNALING LINE CIRCUIT - SLC LOOP F-602 SCHEDULE AND CALCULATIONS Packet Pg. 299 8.D.a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SHEET NOTES NO. NOTE � �'"'wr•l�s 1 REFER TO F-001 FOR GENERAL NOTES. KENT WASNENOTON G 2 ALL EXISTING DEVICES TO REMAIN AND RECONNECTED TO NEW FACU VIA EXISTING WIRING. SMOKE DETECTORS ARE LOCATED ABOVE CEILING IN HVAC PLENUM ����F WASyt$CG/ 3 AND ON CEILING AT ELEVATORS. � 43 � 4 SHADED DEVICES ARE RETAINED. �� �ACIST 6868 SS'ON AL oeia2aoas W KEYNOTES Q 0 NO. NOTE F 1 BACKFLOW PREVENTER TAMPER#1 MANAGERS OFFICE 2 BACKFLOW PREVENTER TAMPER#2 s 3 MAIN WATER FLOW N O 4 STANDPIPE TAMPER o a L 5 ELEVATOR PIT TAMPER w CD RECEPTION S � U SPRINKLER RISER, TAMPER SWITCH, AND WATERFLOW SWITCH FOR ry s 6 ADJACENT GENERATOR BUILDING. ®®'® ®®® E Ll Lj 7 RISER TO SECOND FLOOR ED O STAIRS s 8 POST INDICATOR VALVE O CONFERENCE i Fn ROOM FL) z 0 Q W(I of JB S �N Q 0 W� U Q DEVICE LEGEND D,� :3z C �� w o LL SYMBOL NAME ABM ADDRESSABLE INPUT MONITOR } 0 MODULE m Co co o m uj o � a p STAIRS HORN/STROBE -WALL - DEMO _z z � Q W = Co = M COMPUTER ROOM W O = � z � N JB JUNCTION BOX U t VS AIM W O ED s ❑F MANUAL PULL STATION CD N '8 4 h A N � _ t U � z I'lld z 0 MOTORIZED BELL - EX. L s Z � ° � � � 6' � � � E z z z cv w 0 RISER Q o CD o z Q Cn VS AIM W o CD Q Co W W d 0 SMOKE DETECTOR F- o w z Q 5 LU � � U Y W w R C US TAMPER SWITCH > o CD CD ri Cn NEI WATERFLOW SWITCH 7 u- 0 • 5y WALL CD MEWS ® O WOMEN'S t S $ a Gz 9 L) (D J Z B F � � O V$ AIM O 2 vs AIM � X WF AIM ui ILL 3 VS AIM &Vs WF '^ O AIM AIM V J L ❑ 8 N A EXISTING - 1ST FLOOR PLAN Al I SHEET ID 8 0 8 16 F-101 1/8' = 1'-0' scale feet Packet Pg. 300 8.D.a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SHEET NOTES NO. NOTE 1 REFER TO F-001 FOR GENERAL NOTES. KENT WASHINOTON G 2 ALL EXISTING DEVICES TO REMAIN AND RECONNECTED TO NEW FACU VIA EXISTING WIRING. SMOKE DETECTORS ARE LOCATED ABOVE CEILING IN HVAC ���°F WASyt$CG/ 3 PLENUM AND ON CEILING AT ELEVATORS. ' 4 W 4 SHADED DEVICES ARE RETAINED. �� 3 68 I3 68 SSZONAL W KEYNOTES Q 0 N0. NOTE IF 5 1 MOVE AS NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE THE NEW FACU YP 2 RISER TO THIRD FLOOR 3 RISER TO FIRST FLOOR N L 4 STANDPIPE TAMPER o CONFERENCE ROOM 3 d Q ADMIN 5 PARTIAL PARTITION; DOES NOT EXTEND TO WITHIN 1 FT OF THE r s CEILING I I o U Y � Q +' E DEVICE LEGEND S U t w STAIRS SYMBOL NAME d DESIGN ENGINEERING Z s AIM ADDRESSABLE INPUT MONITOR o z a MODULE w o w s FIRE ALARM CONTROL UNIT- DEMO o N � ° Z Y Q cn y U) p Q >r U)oo Co U H u- WORK ROOM FACILITIES O RISER o CLOSET KITCHEN MAIL C 0 SMOKE DETECTOR E vs AIM LAND SURVEY m } no L m Q vs TAMPER SWITCH m o a z z 4 U) < LLI m = N M FILE ROOM STAIRS W � � � _ � D ENVINRONMENTAL 0 (D 0 (7 („) Q' Co Q' co ENGINEERING I.T. EQUIPMENT t X 7 Cl o_ to d CV S w L Q CONFERENCE CONFERENCE u Z Q = ROOM 2B ROOM 2A _ Hi - Z Z z W MEN' m C9 U MEN' W W Z - _ w >- U) Q Q O Z Z Q:zX d s (D _ ii nK i4 I -7/V I.T. 2 z U) ZLoW L Q W � � o � W � Q i V Z � U U C w WwD Y > H C 3 1 C o CONSTRUCTION U U GATE L MAIN LOBBY C d CONFERENCE SPECIAL ROOM 1 S V PROJECTS r r.+ SIGNAL s TECHS s Gz/' ENVINRONMENT GINEERING In� J S S V s z B LAND SURVEY O �j L) (I� p w LL 0 z ❑ N N A Al EXISTING - 2ND FLOOR PLAN SHEET ID 8 0 8 16 F-102 1/88 = 1'-00 scale feet Packet Pg. 301 8.D.a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SHEET NOTES NO. NOTE 1 REFER TO F-001 FOR GENERAL NOTES. KENT WASHINGTON G 2 ALL EXISTING DEVICES TO REMAIN AND RECONNECTED TO NEW FACU VIA EXISTING WIRING. SMOKE DETECTORS ARE LOCATED ABOVE CEILING IN HVAC WASyt$CG/ 3 PLENUM AND ON CEILING AT ELEVATORS. �0 43 68 W 4 SHADED DEVICES ARE RETAINED. �� �E�ISTS?- SSZONAL �lyG W KEYNOTES Q 0 NO. NOTE F OFFICE OFFICE 1 RISER TO SECOND AND FOURTH FLOOR 2 STANDPIPE TAMPER OFFICE 3 PARTIAL PARTIITION; DOES NOT EXTEND TO WITHIN 1 FT OF THE CEILING N �L OPEN OFFICE Z O a a COMBINED OFFICE AREA �+ s s DEVICE LEGEND w POLYGRAPH OBSERV. 0 d U SYMBOL NAME Y ADDRESSABLE INPUT MONITOR 4) E OFFICE MODULE 0) ❑ DETECTIVE OFFICE OFFICE WORKSTATIONS STAIRS JUNCTION BOX NTERV. O INSPECTOR Z 0 L L S WORKSTATIONS 0 RISER z0 z° z Q� W U 0 $ sToaaG Q 0 0 N � SMOKE DETECTOR W v °°CO Q Z r� :i Z Cl) a� CONFERENCE ROOM O O < LL WAREAG Vs TAMPER SWITCH o r- C OFFICE d MW C VEND. G vs AIM ❑ in o m i a W m Lu BREAKROOM /1 Z z Y O D L U STAIRS STORAGE W � _ -) LLJ N .M.. OOFU U � U) � U w o X W o_ to d N � fC • :01 N C3 Z lIm OFFICE STORAGE BREAK W Q MENS WOMEN'S cm) Z � O W rn (� C C� ~ ~ Z E 0 ® s Ww0 ERcU) 2 m - � (D Lu< a O Z_ z_ >r PLANNER/DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER Z 0 = 0Co W WORKSTATIONS z > Q W W W y 1 z C W Q> 3 30FFICES, CHENETiE W 0 U > U Lxl WORKROOM &OPEN 0 ICE AREA U W J C FCI. YP o Cl ID s U U Q W r c L E d s s sEj Ej i r Q CONFERENCE z ROOM OPEN OFFICE S RECEPTION CONFERENCE C•^/ ROOM V S B 1--- 0 `o 0 OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE W IF] , 0 , N A Al EXISTING - 3RD FLOOR PLAN I SHEET ID 8 0 8 16 F-103 1/8' = 1'-0' scale feet Packet Pg. 302 8.D.a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SHEET NOTES NO. NOTE 1 REFER TO F-001 FOR GENERAL NOTES. KENT WASHINOTON G 2 ALL EXISTING DEVICES TO REMAIN AND RECONNECTED TO NEW FACU VIA EXISTING WIRING. SMOKE DETECTORS ARE LOCATED ABOVE CEILING IN HVAC ���°F WASyt$CG/ 3 PLENUM AND ON CEILING AT ELEVATORS. ' 4 W 4 SHADED DEVICES ARE RETAINED. �� 3 68 IS 68 SSZONAL W KEYNOTES Q 0 NO. NOTE F PLAN CHECK OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE 1 RISER TO THIRD FLOOR 2 TOP OF ELEVATOR TAMPER (N)EMERGENCY 3 STANDPIPE TAMPER MANAGMENTI d PUBLIC EDU. PARTIAL PARTITION; DOES NOT EXTEND TO WITHIN 1 FT OF THE z 0 4 CEILING o a a INSPECTORS s POWER&DATA U S W C U DEVICE LEGEND Y Q E 4 SYMBOL NAME YP KITCHEN ADDRESSABLE INPUT MONITOR STAIRS MODULE o OFFICE OFFICE STOR. Z ° L WORKSTATIONS JUNCTION BOX O ° W 0 U � 0 RISER o N ° �r� Z Y Q U� O O Cl) CONFERENCE S S O �_°0 (� („) ~ LL ROOM RECEPTION S SMOKE DETECTOR 0 C d vs TAMPER SWITCH } VS AIM m } m d ARSON 0 m 0 00 � Q D (E)CORRIDOR Lu z z Y O < U � LLI � W m ti W � 2 � Z � N 0 (D 0 (D U � Cow co ., t X W o_ to CONFERENCEA O N LUNCHROOM 0 0 Co (� L Z aY Q � � Z Z Q � MEN WOMEN — LLI m a - (D Z Z Z OFFICE'A' 0 0 O W w O � >- _R Lu EMP.FILE ` Q QOZ ZQ � STORAGE Z ( _ 0co LL OPEN OFFICE VS AIM t—F. Z "t = Q U z J U U WELLNESS/ W LV LU 0 R C Y > o � c c o y o r r C U U Q WORKSTATIONS LL wi ORIENTATION s` COPY/SUPPLY d ROOM RECEPTION E S s CONFERENCE r r.+ Q S L) CLZ LIT- Q J LOBBY n OPEN OFFICE 0 r B CONFERENCE O ROOM K'] c` ) 0 J OFFICE'B' OFFICE'C' OFFICE'D' OFFICE'E' X W J F, `2 1 N A Al EXISTING - 4TH FLOOR PLAN -(i) SHEET ID 8 0 8 16 F-104 1/8' = 1'-0' scale feet Packet Pg. 303 8.D.a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SHEET NOTES NO. NOTE 1 REFER TO F-001 FOR GENERAL NOTES. KENT WASHINGTON G 2 ALL EXISTING DEVICES TO REMAIN AND RECONNECTED TO NEW FACU VIA EXISTING WIRING. lye H UG HORN/STROBE NOTIFICATION APPLIANCES SHALL BE EDWARDS GC FOR WASytNC�✓ 3 THE CEILINGS (CANDELA SETTING OF 115) AND EDWARDS G1 FOR THE � °� WALLS (CANDELA SETTING OF 75). ' �0 43 68 ISTF ALL APPLIANCES ARE SET AT MAXIMUM CANDELA RATING, AT HIGH DB �ssIONaL 4 OUTPUT, AND A T3 AUDIO PATTERN. OR222023 SMOKE DETECTORS ARE LOCATED ABOVE CEILING IN HVAC PLENUM 5 AND ON CEILING AT ELEVATORS. o ❑ ❑ ❑ F KEYNOTES MANAGERS OFFICE NO. NOTE 1 1V 1 1 ��EST4•N1.14 1 RECONNECT C EXISTING PULL STATION TO NEW NOTIFICATION 115cd m N •L EST4•N1.15 z 115cd � a DEVICE LEGEND L w � RECEPTION O V SYMBOL NAME T O Y = E 1 1 11'1\/-- ® EST4•N2.13 AIM ADDRESSABLE INPUT MODULE - EX. 30cd v w STAIRS 1v 1 HORN/STROBE, CEILING ' O EST4•N2.18 EST4•N2.14 � ,n EST4• •12 15cd 115cd O O CONFERENCE ROOM 1 F 1 1 1 HORN/STROBE, WALL w z z w 1 M 128 OS a r, Q 0 EST4•N2.15 HORN/STROBE, WALL - EX. N o Z a EST4•N1.13 c n w L O O CO < LL EST4•N1.11 30cd EST4•N1.16 ❑F MANUAL PULL STATION 16- o ❑ 15cd 15cd EST4 N2.17 15cd 1 d EST4•N2.16 ❑ MANUAL PULL STATION - EX. E 15cd } Co,�? o Co o Q ' I MOTORIZED BELL - EX. LLI Go 0 z zLLI STAIRS Y O COMPUTER ROOM D (D � Q � w = w w m = M � � N� _ � O � 0 RISER- EX. 0 (D 0 (D Uof CO � � - EST4•N2.12 � VS AIM 71 EST4•N2.19 EOL 47k 115cd W EST4•N1.10 ❑ 75cd ❑ SMOKE DETECTOR - EX. o 15cd O S N c� M (j � Z Cl EST4•N1.17 L rn o EOL z Z § Z cn z � Q 47k J � 0 w < < a) 75cd a O z Z >_ EST4•N1.09 1 VS AIM Z Z U) 0 LL >Q> www 15cd 1h 1 1 1 1 1 1 1R 1 1 1 HO > W DQ r- 1 1 1 1 w U Z J = C EST4•N1.08 1 E5Td w 4•N2.11 w 0 0 EST4•N1.04 > c 15cd 75cd o °r 1 cM C EST4•N2.10 1 1 1 1 1A-- -1A 1A 1 1A IV 15cd v EST4•N1.05 IM Q 15cd w r < MEN'S 0 0 WOMEN'S Cd C M129 ` ® O EST4•N2.08 csi F O O 15cd r EST4•N2.09 a 15cd EST4•N2.06 1 1 1V 1 1 1 1 15cd Z EST4•N1.06 EST4•N1.03 EST4•N1.02 EST4•N1.01 EST4•N2.05 Q 75cd 75cd 75cd 75cd 1 75cd J EST4•N2.07 , 1 1 15cd Q EST4•N2.01 J n/ B 15cd O VS AIM O VS AIM -1 , M126 F 1 �WF AIM EST4•N2.02 EST4•N2.03 LL VS AIM 15cd 15cd LL 1 M127 1 EST4•N2.04 VS WF 1 F 15cd O AIM AIM EST4•N1.07 N A Al FIRE ALARM - 1 ST FLOOR PLAN SHEET ID 8 0 8 16 F-105 1/8N = 1'-0" scale f eet Packet Pg. 304 8.D.a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SHEET NOTES NO. NOTE 1 REFER TO F-001 FOR GENERAL NOTES. KENT WASHINGTON G 2 ALL EXISTING DEVICES TO REMAIN AND RECONNECTED TO NEW FACU VIA EXISTING WIRING. lye H UG HORN/STROBE NOTIFICATION APPLIANCES SHALL BE EDWARDS GC FOR y��OF WASytNC�✓ 3 THE CEILINGS (CANDELA SETTING OF 115) AND EDWARDS G1 FOR THE WALLS (CANDELA SETTING OF 75). , �0 43 68 ISTV ALL APPLIANCES ARE SET AT MAXIMUM CANDELA RATING, AT HIGH DB �ssIONAL �� 4 OUTPUT, AND A T3 AUDIO PATTERN. 5 SMOKE DETECTORS ARE LOCATED ABOVE CEILING IN HVAC PLENUM AND ON CEILING AT ELEVATORS. o ❑ ❑ F —i E57sps, L L KEYNOTES NO. NOTE EST4•N4.08 1v PARTIAL PARTITION; DOES NOT EXTEND TO WITHIN 1 FT OF THE 75cd 1 CEILING CONFERI NCE ROOM d N II� Z C EST4•N4.10 OL 47k r 75cd a a ADMIN E5 15cd DEVICE LEGEND o SYMBOL NAME T LLL<2 +' EST4•N4•07 AIM ADDRESSABLE INPUT MODULE - EX. E: O 15cd V w ❑ FACU FIRE ALARM CONTROL UNIT STAIRS Vl EST4•N4.06 115cd 1 ' iv ' EST4•N3.04 0 O R 1 EST4•N4•0 S DESIGN ENGINEERING HORN/STROBE, CEILING z o z an KITCHEN 115cd z z Of Q 115cd w O � w D U HORN/STROBE, WALL o Co - � 0 WORKROOM N U ~ Y Q ' EST4•N4.04 15cd �M ISOLATION MODULE o o LL L 1 O EST4•N4.05 MAIL ' EST4•N4.02 30cd EST4•N4.03 15cd 30cd FACILITIES 1 1 , , ❑ MANUAL PULL STATION E 1 1 1 1rt 1 1 1 1 1 1 d VS AIM LAND SURVEY m } Co d m ❑ 0) F O RISER- EX. w m ❑ � a D T. 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 STAIRS EQUIPMENT Lu z Y H_ ----AU 2 iu ti LL ENVINRONMENTAL FILE ROOM LU 0 � 0 (D U � U) of U) cn � Q � w = m = EST4•N3.05 0 SMOKE DETECTOR- EX. ENGINEERING 15cd CONFERENCE CONFERENCE L ROOM 2B ROOM 2A �( EST4•N3.06 1 w 30cd 1 _o N O EST4•N3.03 co 1 EST4•N3.17 EOL 47k S M �j H z 1 1 ' EST4•N3.15 EST4•N3.16 30cdOcd 'Co) CL z 5 0 EST4•N3.13 woMENs MENs '< w 15cd 1 1 30cd 30cd Z Co Z z z Eo 01ww0 WU) X: EST4•N3.14 0 3 W Q Q 30cd Q O Z z O U> 2 C9 ii I.T. Z > (n Z w w L Q w BPS1 EST4 F- o � w Q NAC FACU V It z � U 2 U EST4•N3.08 EST4•N3.01 C 15cd 1 F M130 L 15cd Y j o EST4•N3.09 !A M � 15cd CONSTRUCTION SPEC AL U PROJECTS CONFERENCE > LLL ROOM 1 GATE L MAIN LOBBY C 1 EST4.1 •11 1 E 1 1 1 1 1 115cd EST4•N3.10 s EST4•N3.02 L) EST4•N3.12 ST4 SIGNAL 15cd 115cd O TECHS EST4•N3.071 O Q ENVINRONMENTAL ENGINEERING 115cd J O O O Q B LAND SURVEY 0 Q 0 W J LL LL C) Z ❑ ❑ N N A A 1 FIRE ALARM - 2ND FLOOR PLAN SHEET ID 8 0 8 16 F-106 1/8" = 1'-0" scale f eet Packet Pg. 305 8.D.a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SHEET NOTES NO. NOTE 1 REFER TO F-001 FOR GENERAL NOTES. �s KENT WASHIN©TON G 2 ALL EXISTING DEVICES TO REMAIN AND RECONNECTED TO NEW FACU VIA EXISTING WIRING. HORN/STROBE NOTIFICATION APPLIANCES SHALL BE EDWARDS GC of WASH 3 FOR THE CEILINGS (CANDELA SETTING OF 115)AND EDWARDS G1 FOR THE WALLS (CANDELA SETTING OF 75). �0 43 68 W ALL APPLIANCES ARE SET AT MAXIMUM CANDELA RATING, AT HIGH �SS101 T 4 DB OUTPUT, AND A T3 AUDIO PATTERN. SMOKE DETECTORS ARE LOCATED ABOVE CEILING IN HVAC w 5 PLENUM AND ON CEILING AT ELEVATORS. a 0 IF KEYNOTES OFFICE OFFICE NO. NOTE OFFICE PARTIAL PARTITION; DOES NOT EXTEND TO WITHIN 1 FT OF THE 1 1 CEILING BPS1•N1.13 N L 15cd OPEN OFFICE Z 0 O BPS1•N1.14 EOL 15k a Q COMBINED OFFICE AREA POLYGRAPH 75cd DEVICE LEGEND O OBSERV. O w C 1V 1 1 V SYMBOL NAME BPS 1•N 1.12 OFFICE 115cd AIM ADDRESSABLE INPUT MODULE - EX. : E DETECTIVE El OFFICE OFFICE WORKSTATIONS ram... INTERV HORN/STROBE, CEILING STAIRS fn BPS1•N1.08ff A c 15cd S HORN/STROBE, WALL o o ° c, z � a 1 1 1 1 BPS1•N1.03 ~ o U o Lu CONFERENCE ROOM STORAGE Q M Q of L BPS1•N1.06 S BPS1•N1.04 IM o N U � O 115cd ISOLATION MODULE C\jO _ < o 115cd INSPECTOR 15cd NORKSTATIONS Y Zr = Z � 1v v/j; o o Q >_ 1 BPS1•N1.07 BPS1•N1.02 F❑ MANUAL PULL STATION —�° �' " ~ 30cd 15cd r MW MW WAITING BPS1•N1 09 OFFICE 0 RISER- EX. E xl VEND. AREA 15cd VS AIM m m ❑ m BREAKROOM 1 1 A 1 A 1 A 1 A 1 1 A 1 A 1 SMOKE DETECTOR - EX. z z w � BPS1•N1.11 F OS � m o w Q 1 1A 1A 1A 1A 1 1A 1A 1 .. >> Y o p 30c 1 M133 STAIRS LD > U STORAGE W V BPS1•N1.10 1 1 1 1 w � _ N 15cd o c7 o (3.0 � cn cn w BPS1•N 1•o BPS1•N1.01 30cd OFFICE 15cd x STORAGE W • O fn 1 1 1 Lu 1 1 N � BREAK EST4•N5.09 ® O N 15cd MEWS WOMEN'S CMD z 5 z Q 1V 1 1 � � O 0 O E EST4•N5.08 EST4•N5.07 U O w cn zz K = L EST4•N5.10 30cd ® 0 30cd 75cd 1 � � � wQQ Q ST4•N5.01 Q 0 z Z >_ PLANNER I DEVELOPMENT ENGINEEnJ-D Z = 0 LL WORKSTATIONS 15cd Z � Q W w w y � o w D Q 1 30FFICES,KITCHENETTE W U —F 1A F IM &OPENOFTCHENEA w W W C YP WORKROOM EST4•N5.1 M132 30cd EST4•N5.02 O o 15cd U • U Q u- r c d O s Or EST4•N5.13 EOL 47k 1 1 Q 1 1 iv- 115cd EST4•N5.03 z 1 1 1 1 1 EST4•N5.1 EST4•N5.06 CONFERENCE O 115cd ROOM 115cd 115cd ADMw OPEN OFFICE RECEPTIO` CONFERENCE 1 C ROOM G EST4•N5.04 n/ 75cd LL N B �j L) L) EST4•N5.05 Q 0 30cd w 0 OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE ILL C) OFFICE CYM ) N A Al FIRE ALARM - 3RD FLOOR PLAN SHEET ID 1/80 it-of 8 0 8 16 F-107 scale f eet Packet Pg. 306 8.D.a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SHEET NOTES NO. NOTE 1 REFER TO F-001 FOR GENERAL NOTES. KENT WASHIN©TON G 2 ALL EXISTING DEVICES TO REMAIN AND RECONNECTED TO NEW FACU VIA EXISTING WIRING. HORN/STROBE NOTIFICATION APPLIANCES SHALL BE EDWARDS GC of WASH 3 FOR THE CEILINGS (CANDELA SETTING OF 115)AND EDWARDS G1 FOR THE WALLS (CANDELA SETTING OF 75). �0 43 68 W ALL APPLIANCES ARE SET AT MAXIMUM CANDELA RATING, AT HIGH �ss E 'STER°��� 4 IONAL E DB OUTPUT, AND A T3 AUDIO PATTERN. SMOKE DETECTORS ARE LOCATED ABOVE CEILING IN HVAC Lu 5 PLENUM AND ON CEILING AT ELEVATORS. a 0 F PLAN CHE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE KEYNOTES BPS1•N4.12 NO. NOTE 75cd (I �� [-� (I � [-� 1 PARTIAL PARTITION; DOES NOT EXTEND TO WITHIN 1 FT OF THE 1v BPS1•N4.11 CEILING �-ToRs BPS1•N4.10 30cd m 15cd N •L Z O (N)EMERGENCY O MANAGMENT/ a-• PUBLIC EDU. a POWER&DATA DEVICE LEGEND 0 BPS1•N4.13 EOL 15k S Lu L U 30cd BPS1•N4.09 SYMBOL NAME ' 30cd Y BPS1•N4.08 a� 15cd BPS1•N4.07 Q 15cd ADDRESSABLE INPUT MODULE - EX. E 1 BPS1•N4.03 15cd YP HORN/STROBE, CEILING STAIRS N KITCHEN d OFFICE OFFICE STOR ' ' ' ' 1„ 1 HORN/STROBE, WALL Oz 0 OZ an WORKSTATIONS Z BPS1•N4.01 Lu 0 z w D CONFERENCE r 4 ROOM BPS1•N4.05 BPS1•N4.02 w , U 1 1 115cd ISOLATION MODULE a o ¢ � o 75cd 75cd - O Q O Q O U)BPS1•N3.09 EOL 15k U) aL 15cd �\ LL ARSON RECEPTION 1v S ❑F MANUAL PULL STATION -�° �' ~ - BPS1•N4.06 15cd BPS1•N4.04 15cd 0 RISER- EX. E 00 m 0 � F - 1v ' O SMOKE DETECTOR- EX. o CID zLu c BPS1•N2.18 EOL 15k M135 Y 30cd 1 (E)CORRIDOR (D U LLI ti BPS1•N3.08 STAIRS LL1 � Of � = D N cn � � w = CD BPS1•N3.01 0 (D 0 (D 0 U) Of U) , 15cd 15cd > X W • _o to d CONFERENCEA O N L LUNCHROOM Cl) (� � Z Q1 CD z 0137 1 1 1 1 MEN WOMEN W U) 0 EMP.FILE Z cn Z Z Z L OFFICE'A' BPS1•N2.17 BPS1•N3.07 BPS1•N3.06 STORAGE BPS1•N3.04 0 0 O w w O U) = 75cd 15cd 15cd 15cd 1v v w } Q Q 1 BPS1•N3.03 BPS1•N3.02 z CD O = LL BPS1•N3.05 w o ¢ w � 1 STORAGE 30cd 30cd z ov < w � Q OPEN OFFICEL4 30cd VS AIM Lu A 1A 1 1 1 1A 1 F 1 �M V W W U) D C Y > c WELLNESS/ M134 1 0 � STORAGE BPS1•N2.01 0 AO � BPS1•N2.15 BPS1•N2.16 15cd U 15cd ' 15cd BPS1•N2.05 BPS1•N2.02A L Q BPS 1•N2.08 COPY/SUPPLY 30cd W 15cd ROOM 115cd r O ORIENTATION iv C RECEPTION C 1 WORKSTATIONS S BPS1•N2.14 S BPS1•N2.07 ' 15cd BPS1•N2.10 15cd r 15cd a CONFERENCE O O Z 1 CC ri A :::) 1V 1 BPS1•N2.06 Liv G J 15cd LOBBY BPS1•N2.04 1 1 1 BPS1•N2.13 BPS1•N2.12 DPEN OFFICE 75cd �y 30cd 15cd BPS1•N2.11 1 1 J L.L B 115cd 1 BPS1•N2.03 0 BPS1•N2•09 CONFERENCE 30cd 0 15cd OFFICE'E' ROOM OFFICE'B' OFFICE'C' OFFICE'D' LL F1 11 LL A FIRE ALARM - 4TH FLOOR PLAN Al I SHEET ID 8 0 8 16 F-108 1i8• = 1,_0, scale feet Packet Pg. 307 8.D.a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SHEET NOTES NO. NOTE 1 REFER TO F-001 FOR GENERAL NOTES. KENT WAS Fit NOTON G 2 WIRING DETAILS SHOWN ARE INDICATIVE OF TYPICAL CONDITIONS AND MAY NOT REFLECT HOW THE BPS10A WILL ACTUALLY BE CONNECTED. �� of waS Gr 43 68 W ISTERE9 SS'ON AL �lyG w H Q N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 F ID � a Ej e ® IIIIAC1 T NA QM •L z C ® C2 UT O a NAC IN E 2 0 Ma AL X C ❑U o r; 0 0 .... I Q E • S NSE C❑M 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 T6 15 14 13 12 II 10 9 rgnal 12 11 10 9 6 IS 14 13 12 I1 10 9 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 W Signal Module CC Signal Module CC CCI Signal Module CCl Signal Module CC a .. N II II O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z L gnomes b z 6 5 4 2 7 6 5 4 3 2 4 3 6 5 4 3 2 7 6 5 4 2 0 z N 77 w 0 ww • _ ® • �N Q LU o 0 a a N TR❑UBLE C❑M �� p p Q L L 0 C� G o m w a w m z z Y L p DATA OUT � Q w = m = w M LU � � = , _ � N 0 (D 10 (D UQ� cn0� U) w SYSTEM OUTPUTS x w _o N N � fC zCn aY o zip a DAT IN ��1 Z � z z �z `� GJ w w 0 wcn = Cn z z 3: 3 z �: w w w H o w Q +� O� w � � C \O �\p�\p�OGP�� w > w D 5�P 5 P GPI -lam o °r 70 C �pG PLO O pQ� p�� LL LL a c A� J J s SYSTEM INPUTS � � � �JQ ��G ��G J A B C D E F Q 1 PULL STATION • • 1 2 SMOKE DETECTOR • • 2 w 4 GROUND LEVEL ELEVATOR LOBBY SMOKE DETECTOR • • • 4 0 B 5 SECOND FLOOR ELEVATOR LOBBY SMOKE DETECTOR • • 1 • 5 6 THIRD FLOOR ELEVATOR LOBBY SMOKE DETECTOR • • 1 • 6 7 FOURTH FLOOR ELEVATOR LOBBY SMOKE DETECTOR • • • 7 Q 8 SPRINKLER WATERFLOW • • 8 J 9 SPRINKLER WATERFLOW FOR ADJACENT STRUCTURE • • 9 Q POSITIVE C RESISTOR 10 SPRINKLER TAMPER SWITCH • 10 LIJ 11 FIRE ALARM AC POWER FAILURE • 11 121� NEGATIVE 12 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM LOW BATTERY • 12 LL 13 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FAIL • 13 14 OPEN CIRCUIT • 14 15 GROUND CIRCUIT • 15 A Al PPS/M WIRING DETAILS A5 SEQUENCE OF OPERATIONS SHEET ID 4 0 4 8 F-501 1/4' = 1'-0' scale feet Packet Pg. 308 8.D.a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SHEET NOTES NO. NOTE 1 REFER TO F-001 FOR GENERAL NOTES. KENT WASNINOTON G 2 ALL EXISTING DEVICES TO REMAIN AND RECONNECTED TO NEW FACU VIA EXISTING WIRING. lye H(jG OF WASy G 3 NAC POWER SUPPLIES SHALL BE INTEGRAL TO THE FACU. o���� , t�C�0 e � U) 4 FIELD VERIFY COMPONENTS REQUIRED TO INTERFACE WITH RADIO. 0 43 68 �EGISTVg 11 sSIONAL EXPOSED CABLE w KEYNOTES Q p NO. NOTE EXISTING FIRE ALARM CONTROL UNIT (EST2) IS DEPICTED USING AN F 1 EST4 CABINET AND EST3 DISPLAY MODULE, DUE TO LACK OF EST2 CAD DRAWINGS SINCE THE PRODUCT WAS DISCONTINUED. O 0 N L • • • • 0 mas U a m c INm p U • Y c E 0 O O O a JUNCTION JUNCTION z1 0 O L BOX EST4 BOX z w z EST2 0 w (FACU) 0 O (FACU) O O o Co v U < o LU Z)iz:i z Y Q �� O O LL L O O 0 C� G RADIO � RADIO]���l m Co p al TRANSFORMER o m p a D TRANSFORMER 3 2 w • • W 0 23 CoCop -) N • t x w N � • BPS10A z o 0. � � a, 0 (D E z L ww0 z � U) -j w a Q QOz z cD = � � � u- z3: Q Www uj CD zCD w � Q U Z U U w ww � is �. Y > p � o o +r N N M C r0 r� U O O O r7 Q I N I I I N I I I w Ln I in c s r Q U) z 0 B Lu J W J W z Q Al EXISTING PANEL ELEVATION A5 NEW PANEL ELEVATION p` 1'-0" SHEET ID 1-1/2' = 8 0 8 16 8 0 8 16 F-502 scale inches scale inches Packet Pg. 309