Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
4447
ORDINANCE NO. 4447 AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the Kent Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities Element to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts (CPZ-2022-1). RECITALS A. The City of Kent has adopted a school impact fee program as authorized by the State Growth Management Act (GMA) and RCW 82.02.050. Impact fees may be collected and spent only for the public facilities which are addressed by the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the City's comprehensive plan. In order to collect school impact fees to be spent by the school districts, the City must adopt the schools' Capital Facilities Plans into the City's Capital Facilities Plan Element. B. The State of Washington Growth Management Act (GMA) requires internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements and the plans from other jurisdictions. To assure that comprehensive plans remain relevant and up to date, the GMA allows amendments to the capital facilities element of comprehensive plans concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a city budget. RCW 36.70A.130(2)(a)(iv). 1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2021-2022 - 2026-2027 School Dist. School District Capital Facilities Plans C. The City of Kent has established procedures for amending the Comprehensive Plan in Chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code (KCC), allowing amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the City budget and allowing the City Council to hold the public hearing instead of the Land Use and Planning Board, as laid out in KCC 12.02.010. D. The Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts have submitted proposed amendments to their Capital Facilities Plans to be included in an amendment of the City's Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. E. After providing appropriate public notice, the City Council of the City of Kent considered the requested Comprehensive Plan amendment and held a public hearing on the same on October 18, 2022. F. On September 15, 2022, the City provided the required 60 day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 to the State of Washington of the City's proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities E►ement of the Comprehensive Plan, The 60 day notice period has passed, and by operation of law, it is deemed approved. G. On November 15, 2022, the City Council of the City of Kent approved the Capital Facilities Element amendment CPZ-2022-1 to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached and incorporated by this reference. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2021-2022 - 2026-2027 School Dist. School District Capital Facilities Plans ORDINANCE SECTION 1. - Amendment. The Kent Comprehensive Plan, and its Capital Facilities Element, are amended to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached and incorporated by this reference (CPZ-2022-1). SECTION 2. - Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering; or references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations. SECTION 3. - Severability. If any one or more section, subsection, or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, that decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. - Effective Date. This ordinance will take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law. Dai-�,a:Ra(�rin November 15, 2022 DANA RALPH, MAY R N Date Approved ATTEST: MAA WAY November 15, 2022 KIMBERLEY . KOMOTO, CI CLERK Date Adopted November 18, 2022 Date Published 3 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2021-2022 - 2026-2027 School Dist. School District Capital Facilities Plans I Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2021-2022 - 2026-2027 School :hool District Capital Facilities Plans Exhibit A 4& KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT VM EQUITY EXCELLENCE COMMUNITY Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan 2021-2022 through 2027-2028 June 2022 Kent School District No. 415 12033 SE 2561h Street Kent, Washington 98030-6643 (253) 373-7526 BOARD of DIRECTORS Ms. Leslie Hamada, President Mr. Joe Bento, Vice President Mr. Awale Farah, Legislative Representative Ms. Michele Bettinger, Director Mr. Tim Clark, Director ADMINISTRATION Israel Vela Superintendent of Schools Dr. Wade Barringer, Senior Executive Director Strategic Initiatives & Operations Dave Bussard, Executive Director Operations & Facilities Sara Dumlao, Interim Assistant Director of Procurement Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table of Contents I- Executive Summary...................................................................................................1 II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection...............................................................................3 III - Current Kent School District "Standard of Service".................................................7 Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students .................................................. 7 Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students ....................................... 8 IV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools.............................................................9 V - Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan................................................................14 VI- Portable Classrooms.............................................................................................19 VII - Projected Six -Year Classroom Capacity................................................................20 VIII- Finance Plan.......................................................................................................26 IX - Summary of Changes to June 2021 Capital Facilities Plan......................................36 X- Appendices............................................................................................................37 I - Executive Summary This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan has been prepared by the Kent School District as the organization's capital facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual Plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2022 for the 2022-2023 school year. This annual update of the Plan reflects no new major capital projects, a zero -dollar impact fee rate due to declining enrollment and new capacity study. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all the district's needs. The district may prepare interim and periodic Long -Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, considering a longer or shorter period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the district as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, and Renton and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. This Plan has also been submitted to the cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac for their information and inclusion in their Comprehensive Plans. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee- implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Program capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Portables in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District's standard of service and the existing inventory of permanent facilities. The District's program capacity of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the state's mandated reduction of class size to meet the standard of service for Kent School District. Portables provide additional interim capacity. Kent School District is the fifth largest (FTE basis) district in the state. Enrollment is electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction ("OSPI") on Form P-223. Although funding apportionment is based on Annual Average Full Time Equivalent (AAFTE), enrollment on October 1 is a widely recognized "snapshot in time" that is used to report the District's enrollment for the year as reported to OSPI. The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of interim facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the interim use of portables. This Plan currently represents projects in process funded primarily by the Kent School District's 2016 Bond, as well as the 2018 Capital Construction Levy. Additional information about these projects can be found on the district's capital projects homepage (tin-U. Additionally, project updates sent to our community of stakeholders can be accessed on the KSD website link . Based on revised student generation rates, and district enrollment projects, the district has updated the proposed student impact fee rate for the coming year. For a short overview, see Section IX (Summary of Changes to the June 2021 Capital Facilities Plan). II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, enrollment growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years (See Table 2). For this Plan, the district relied substantially on the results from Dr. Les Kendrick's study of long-range enrollment forecasts for the Kent School District in the Winter of 2021. King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system (See Table 1). 8.26% of 25,273 King County live births in 2017 is projected for 2,087 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2022. This is a decrease of 738 live births in King County over the previous year (See Table 2). Early Childhood Education students (also identified as "ECE"), "Early Childhood Special Education ("ECSE") students are forecast and reported to OSPI separately on Form P-223H for Special Education Enrollment. Capacity is reserved to serve students in the ECE programs at elementary schools. In addition to live birth data, enrollment projections for October 1, 2022 going forward rely upon the results of the enrollment study by Dr. Kendrick, utilizing the "medium growth" methodology. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions will be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. The Kent School District serves eight permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, and Auburn and smaller portions of the cities of SeaTac, Black Diamond, and Maple Valley. STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last ten years. Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary .270 Middle School .105 Senior High .075 Total .450 Multi -Family Elementary .082 Middle School .035 Senior High .029 Total .146 The student generation factor is based on 2,967 SFD (Single Family Detached) units built between 2012 and 2022. There are 801 K-6 students geocoded to those homes. Therefore, the SFD student yield for students in grades K thru 6 is 0.270, translating to 0.27 student for every new SFD unit built or 27 students for every 100. Apartments and Condos were calculated independently, then combined for the Multi -Family attached student yields. In preparing the 2021-2022 to 2026-2027 Capital Facilities Plan the District contracted with Davis Demographics, a noted expert in demographic studies for school districts, to analyze and prepare the student generation factor. EDC included both "garden" and "urban style" apartments in the calculation for multi -family residences. Within the district's borders there are several income -based and multi -family housing projects coming on-line in 2022/2023. Once developed with occupancy occurring the District does recognize that the student generation for multi -family housing may impact future Capital Facilities Plan updates. 4 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 OCTOBER REPORT 1251 H (HEADCOUNT) ENROLLMENT HISTORY For 2022 CFP - Headcount Enrollment History LB = Live Births LB in 2008 LB in 2009 LB in 2010 LB in 2011 LB in 2012 LB in 2013 LB in 2014 LB in 2015 LB in 2016 October HC Enrollment 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 King County Live Births' 25,222 25,057 24,514 24,630 25,032 24,910 25,348 25,487 26,011 Increase / Decrease 323 -165 -543 116 402 280 316 139 524 Kindergarten / Birth %' 8.40% 8.34% 8.34% 8.17% 8.14% 7.98% 7.93% 6.68% 7.06% Kindergarten 2,119 2,090 2,045 2,013 2,037 1,989 2,010 1,703 1,836 Grade 1 2,186 2,127 2,131 2,067 2,056 2,061 2,036 1,882 1,768 Grade 2 2,055 2,190 2,163 2,163 2,077 2,008 2,091 1,980 1,817 Grade 3 1,922 2,070 2,176 2,195 2,143 2,043 1,995 2,001 1,938 Grade 4 2,087 1,956 2,089 2,195 2,218 2,118 2,038 1,912 1,924 Grade 5 2,008 2,116 1,958 21103 2,189 2,169 2,120 1,937 1,872 Grade 6 2,079 2,023 2,058 1,952 2,120 2,184 2,164 2,024 1,894 Grade 7 Middle School 2,046 2,104 1,974 2,021 1,922 2,044 2,166 2,010 1,925 Grade 8 " 2,121 2,091 2,100 2,021 2,043 1,882 2,073 2,086 1,937 Grade 9 Senior High 2,483 2,428 2,093 2,105 2,006 2,004 1,888 2,006 2,042 Grade 10 2,046 2,151 2,165 2,099 2,080 1,946 2,035 1,813 1,959 Grade 11 1,873 1,802 1,818 1,865 1,823 1,732 1,663 1,744 1,583 Grade 12 1,539 1,576 1,742 1,730 1,810 1,654 1,634 1,484 1,655 Total Enrollment 2 26,564 26,724 26,512 26,529 26,524 25,834 25,913 24,582 24,150 Yearly Headcount Increase / Decrease -48 160 -212 17 -5 -690 79 -1,331 -432 Cumulative Increase -267 -107 -319 1 -302 1 -307 -997 -918 -2,249 -2,681 Change to Full Day Kindergarten for all schools 1 This number indicates actual births in King County 5 years prior to enrollment year as updated by Washington State Department of Health, Center for Health Statistics. Kent School District percentage based on actual Kindergarten enrollment 5 years later. 2 Enrollment reported to OSPI on Form P-223 generates basic education funding and excludes Early Childhood Special Education "ECSE" & "B2" or Birth to 2 Preschool Inclusive Education and excludes College -only Running Start students. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 1 May 2022 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX -YEAR ENROLLMENT PROJECTION 2021 - 2027 Enrollment Projections Full Day Kindergarten at all Elem LB in 2016 LB in 2017 LB in 2018 1 LB in 2019 1 LB in 2020 Est LB in 2021 1 Est. LB in 2022 ACTUAL ENROLLMENT PROJECTED ENROLLMENT October 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 King County Live Births 26,011 25,273 24,337 24,090 24,031 24,344 24,669 Increase / Decrease 524 -738 -936 -247 -59 313 325 Kindergarten / Birth % 7.06% 8.26% 8.19% 8.22% 8.23% 8.13% 8.13% FD Kindergarten 1,836 2,087 1,993 1,979 1,978 1,980 2,006 Grade 1 1,768 2,096 2,143 2,041 2,027 2,024 2,026 Grade 2 1,817 2,079 2,103 2,146 2,044 2,028 2,025 Grade 3 1,938 2,008 2,088 2,107 2,150 2,046 2,030 Grade 4 1,924 2,003 2,020 2,096 2,115 2,156 2,052 Grade 5 1,872 2,033 2,000 2,013 2,089 2,106 2,146 Grade 6 1,894 1,964 2,060 2,021 2,035 2,109 2,126 Grade 7 Middle School 1,925 2,007 1,976 2,068 2,029 2,041 2,115 Grade 8 1,937 2,072 2,032 1,997 2,090 2,049 2,060 Grade 9 Senior High 2,042 2,274 2,263 2,216 2,178 2,276 2,232 Grade 10 " " 1,959 2,138 2,116 2,102 2,058 2,021 2,112 Grade 11 " " 1,583 1,669 1,859 1,836 1,824 1,784 1,751 Grade 12 " " 1,655 1,320 1,465 1,628 1,608 1,596 1,561 Total Enrollment Projection 24,150 25,750 26,118 26,250 26,225 26,216 26,242 Yearly Increase/Decrease -432 1,600 368 132 -25 -9 26 Yearly Increase/Decrease % -1.76% 6.63% 1.43% 0.51% -0.10% -0.03% 0.10% Total Enrollment Projection* 24,150 25,750 26,118 26,250 26,226 26,216 26,242 *Does not include iGrad, RS Live births for King County are estimates for year 2021 & 2022 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study 2021 ("Medium Growth Model" Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 May 2022 III - Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County Code 21A.06.1225 references a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the district which would best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as "impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower-class size at those facilities. Portables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanentfacilities. The standard of service defined herein will continue to evolve in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service. This process will affect various aspects of the District's standard of service and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students Class size ratio for grades K - 3 is planned for an average of 23 students per class, not to exceed 26. • Class size ratio for grades 4 - 6 is planned for an average of 27 students per class, not to exceed 29. Some special programs require specialized classroom space and the program capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in special programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs. Students may also be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Some identified students will also be provided educational opportunities in classrooms for special programs such as those designated as follows: English Learners (EL) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title 1) — Federal Program Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) — State Program Highly Capable Students — State Program Reading, math or science Labs Dual Language Programs in four elementary schools and one middle school Inclusive Education Service for Elementary and Secondary students with disabilities may be provided in a separate or self-contained classroom sometimes with a capacity of 10-15 students, depending on the program. Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings per the negotiated collective bargaining agreement with KEA. • The average class size ratio for grades 7-8 is 30 students per class and 143 students per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 150 based on five class periods per day. • The average class size ratio for grades 9-12 is 32 students per class and 153 students per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 160 based on five class periods per day. Like Inclusive Education Programs listed above, many other secondary programs require specialized classroom space which can reduce the functional capacity of the permanent school buildings, such as technology labs, performing arts activities, a variety of career and technical education programs, and other specialized programs. Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a workspace during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the Kent School District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 95%for secondary schools. Functional capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level. 8 IV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent functional capacity to house 39,946 students and interim (portable) capacity to house 4,360. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section III. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity (See Table 3). The ratio between permanent capacity and portable capacity is 89.1%-10.9%. The functional capacity is periodically updated for changes in the programs, additional classrooms, and new schools. Functional capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes implemented in the Fall of 2021. Calculation of Elementary, Middle School and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B, and C. Maps of existing schools are included. For clarification, the following is a brief description of some of the non-traditional programs for students in Kent School District: The 2021-2022 school year began with our newly branded Academy Program within the district, housed at our new Kent Laboratory Academy. The project was approved by the Kent Board of Directors in 2019 by utilizing funding from the 2016 Bond Project "20 Classrooms". The new facility has 24 classrooms and will now be utilized for many types of Academy related programs. The previous facility of this program (Kent Phoenix Academy Campus) will have the voter approved 2018 Levy Projects completed and has added to our current capacity for our District at the secondary level in the future. iGrad - Kent School District has developed the Individualized Graduation and Degree Program or "iGrad". iGrad is an Open Door (Drop -out Reengagement) School that offers a second plus chance to students aged 16-21 who have dropped out of high school or are at risk of not earning a high school diploma by age 21. iGrad is not included in this Capital Facilities Plan, because it is served as a leased space at the Kent Hill Plaza Shopping Center. Over the past three years, enrollment in the iGrad program has averaged over 300 students. 9 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS 2021 - 2022 Functional SCHOOL L Year I ABR ADDRESS Opened Capacity Carriage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235 - 140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 626 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042 568 Covington Elementary 2018 CO 25811 156th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 744 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225 - 180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 629 East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 779 Emerald Park 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 653 Fairwood Elementary 1969 FW 16600 - 148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 528 George T. Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 640 Glenridge Elementary 1996 GR 19405 - 120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 591 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700 - 191st Place SE, Kent 98042 595 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641 - 144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 634 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915 - 186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 668 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700 - 64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 760 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660 - 142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 725 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 768 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710 - 108th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 706 Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621 - 140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 820 Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98030 688 Neely -O'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 864 Panther Lake Elementary 2009 PL 12022 SE 216th Street, Kent, 98031 813 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 728 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825 - 118th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 732 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030 - 162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 661 River Ridge Elementary 2021 RR 00000 - 22420 Military Rd S SeaTac, WA 886 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135 - 228th Ave SE, Black Diamond 98010 549 Scenic Hill Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030 837 Soos Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 591 Springbrook Elementary 1969 SB 20035 - 100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 730 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300 - 132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 719 Elementary TOTAL 20,232 Cedar Heights Middle School 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 Street, Covington 98042 1,170 Mattson Middle School 1981 MA 16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042 1,020 Meeker Middle School 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 1170 Meridian Middle School 1958 MM 23480 - 120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 1,110 Mill Creek Middle School 2005 MC 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 1,200 Northwood Middle School 1996 NW 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 1,140 Kent Phoenix Acedamy 1966 KPA 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98030 1,140 Middle School TOTAL 7,950 Kent -Meridian High School 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98030 2,595 Kentlake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042 2,714 Kentridge Senior High School 1968 KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 2,996 Kentwood Senior High School 1981 KW 25800 - 164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 2,917 Senior High TOTAL 11,222 Kent Laboratory Academy 2021 KLA 00000 - 208th St Kent, WA 98030 542 DISTRICT TOTAL 39,946 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan 10 Table 3 May 2022 W1PNT SCT4c)m- DISTRICT EQUITY i EXCELLENCE COMMUNITY Tukwila Seatde-Tacoma International Airport S 18 Des Moines z S 2� 509 nl ke 1 S 320th St N A ral WaY 0 5 1 L I I I I Miles rlomonfnrii gr-hnnl Rni mrInriPc 1� L V I 1■ V I I �. V� /� V �... I• V V � � v v �� �� Elliott Mirrorm y Henrys Middle Issaquah Cre Natural Are Black Diamond VDAVIS DEMOGRAPHICS KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Middle School Boundaries EQUITY! EXCELLENCE !COMMUNITY 518 Tukwila Maplewood Elliott uwa w Mirrormont McMicken = Pal J' Heights a Middle kdy g _ an Mountain Ceaat Issaquah satuahCral reak S 180th S[ [I 7 Ho <nwoodMs Cedar Grove s 188th St SeaTaC S09 Meeker MS dr- q Des Moines ( Green River 7 1` Narura! . h - Resources Area SE '[4th S 228,1) St Merid(an MS � Maple Valley -Mill [reek MS \ Midway s I }, Kent $ �J MEM It on MS { 1 o &_ights L a Mili. tree SE 25r, tip St s I; f Earthxorks Cedar Cherokee Bay Star Lake. - Lr1 gton s1e? Park Ravens Henrys 169i � r ,� a � ;, t ke jl a Sa yer a...w,... r Lake � � I' � � �, 552 v1 ' Lea Hill Auburn Washington Black Diamond Auburn decal Way ;�F� "'^' Narrows National Golf - r/ " Natural,Area Club D"IC V 0 0.5 1 2 _ • w ,. vt I ^^I�c I Millill DEMOGRAPHICS 4& KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT High School Boundaries EQUITY I EXCELLENCE I COMMUNITY 518 - Maplewood Elliott Tukwila � Mirrormont v � McMicken = Fai ood�Golf Q and Heights an Country Cedar z Middle k y('IDh Mountain rlto Issaquah Creek ce�a Natural Area S I80th St �6' Cedar Grove s -sstn s SeaTac} 5[5 509 �t a + Kent ge s Des Moines Green River Natural Resources Area ? S 228th St s Maple Valley Midway t8 l Kent �tO Kent Meridian HS L Mill Aek Kentwood HS s %{ Earthworks f Park 2 Cherokee Bay Star Lake gton 576) Park c Ravens Henrys 009 pl" vi m KenWk'HS So er r Lake a x _ A y a 552fr a Lea Hill S 320th Stl' J N Auburn y Washington Black Diamond _ Auburn National Golf deral Way %" "' � Narrows Natural Area ClubDAV 1 S o os 13t 2 A N 13 I I I IIII&V DEMOGRAPHICS V - Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan In November 2016, the voters of the Kent School District approved a bond measure for $252 million. This new bonding authority provided for the replacement for Covington Elementary school, which opened in August of 2018. The new River Ridge Elementary school and our new Kent Laboratory Academy opened August 2021. As a critical component of capital facilities planning, county and city planners and decision - makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety to and from school and bus stops as well as bus pull-outs and turn- arounds. Included in this Plan is an inventoryof potential projects and sites identified bythe District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future (See Table 4 & Sitemap). Voter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is secured for purchase of additional sites, but some may be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements, and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. The Board will continue an annual review of standards of service and those decisions will be reflected in each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. Our District is in the initial stages of a future Capital Measure which is aligned to Strategic Plan and continues to make a priority to revitalize, rejuvenate and rebuild our aging schools as well as begin a process to remove interim classroom portables and find room or create permanent structures to reduce and eventually eliminate the more than 172 portable classrooms in our district. We will continue to determine capacity versus enrollment as well as programs to ensure this goal to reduce and or eliminate all portables in our district is obtained in the next several years. As a part of the planning process, the District has been tracking a few major development projects which have affected enrollment and will continue to increase students' forecasts. On Meeker Street in Kent we have seen several major apartment complexes, ETHOS and Midtown 64 Apartments. These continue to have an impact on enrollment as they fill up their newly built facilities. Alexian Gateway Project is located on the corner of Military Road and Veterans Drive in Kent and will start occupancy in school year 2023-2024, with 283 planned units. In Covington, we are tracking a multi -family house development which has been approved and construction has begun. The 1700-unit Lakepointe Urban Community will fall within our enrollment boundary and proposed completion of Phase 4 is shown to be 2027. 14 Construction in the Kent School District boundaries have been steadily rising over the last three years and planned communities are now being recognized through the planning teams in multiple city and county jurisdictions we serve. 15 v KATERRA' C - - -- - -� * TCR ol we]: f 11 t � ' GATEWAY _ JAPARTMENTS PA AiN LEGEND ONE BEDROOM UNITS TWO BEDROOM UNITS THREE BEDROOM UNITS --� TYPE UNITS I U --- NO UNIT -GARAGE ONLY BUILDING BIGNAGE NUMBERING/ 1. UNIT NUMBERS READ TOP TO ADDRESSING BOTTOM(FLOOR I4)AS SHEET11,2,3) I UNIT NUMBERING PLAN i INDICATED ON THEUNIT STACK G.00.014 Phasing Legend II ®Phase IA -Maple Hills Division 5 Preliminary Plat approval in third Quarter 2021. Construction and Final Plat Recording 2022. NOTE: THE LOCATION OF DEVELOPMENT. INCLUDINGS ROADWAYS AND TRAILS, IS APPROXIMATE AND DOES NOT VEST TO THIER SPECIFIC LOCATION. THE LOCATION OF ALL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION AND THE TERMS OF THE PLANNED ACTION, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, AND APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE. AND FEDERAL LAWS. Lakepointe Urban Village Phasing Map C9AI�POINTD +7 Updat lanuaty 30, 2017 ed September 15, 2021 Legend .M<Jmm-1,-dential ill-fi) ' Foal Poim/I'utliciahedng5px Fko -so Pc-tial lR, Ill '*' G ar Uercznt ® ,Hued —mizI IMRI Pr°PmcJ ParkarJ lSJe Fadlly Uu/Commercial I—) © T-1 stop Mu of.\tJtiTaMhanJ lommcrsialb f oura¢cJ nilhln Peninsula Nea IY9B®!B Pnpued Tr�xk and lrus V.vun Raule wmc srceu swp u¢ht `' 0ke Roue JigiaCenval PoM Future ® WetUmi © Ropoaed TIA Pmkng _ _ W'etland lLlfer ^'-"® len4lverak ' PuMic� Accecsidc Barka and H— O 1Wana/NVJYJe UnJeromain¢� LanJaapc Neac �. ® DlIWt µi."Open Spam _ UnJutudN open space _ _von Foghlamk TA " .. lmaa osam rr.Bl cnnnanona - seep sbpe and Pullers...+ _ r ^ E^ I61. /�fillrr��/i ------------ •� z.z s "{ y Lakepointe Urban Village CYiA1,P0INTE NOTE: THE LOCATION OF DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDINGS ROADWAYS AND TRAILS. IS APPROXIMATE AND DOES NOT VEST TO THIER SPECIFIC LOCATION. THE LOCATION OF ALL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION AND THE TERMS OF THE PLANNED ACTION. THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. AND APPLICABLE LOCAL. STATE, AND FEDERAL LAWS. COMBINED OPEN SPATE TABLE %ONE aR-MU GROSS AIRL\ciE `11 .25 Al PARRS "I Al DPLNSF%CF.- 1,19 \l MIND I A TO— rN1FNITIES .2I NEFA WS- )R038..Atil MR 3JIX . 25,2) R6 53.51- 557 0AAl 41.23A1 5.2]Al R-12 35.34:\l 53 4l 141)AC T67r\l 23.37A,- 11.9R T1 iO fAl 21410 AC 0.5 Al 6i.3fi Al 18.51 AC 93.55 Al 120.55 r\l F VI - Portable Classrooms The Plan references use of portables as interim capacity for facilities. Currently, the District utilizes portables to house students more than functional capacity and for program purposes at some school locations (Please see Appendices A, B, Q. Based on enrollment projections, implementation of full day kindergarten programs, lower state mandated class sizes, functional capacity, and no need for additional interim capacity, the District anticipates no need to purchase or lease additional portables during the next six - year period to ensure capacity requirement (Noted in section V. Six Yr. Planning Construction). During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District's portables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the portables, the school -age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these portables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables may be used as interim facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the times of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Portables currently in the District's inventory are continually evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced or when possible, be removed due to life expectancy. The Districts goal is to reduce and or eliminate all portables so we may provide an equitable learning environment for all. The Plan projects that the District will use portables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of portables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between portables, emerging technologies, and educational restructuring will continue to be examined. 19 VII - Projected Six -Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section IV, the functional capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size requirements, class size fluctuations etc. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3, the functional capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts (See Tables 5 & 5a-b-c). Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment "snapshot in time" to report enrollment for the year. Kent School District continues to be the fifth largest district (both FTE and headcount basis) in the state of Washington. The P-223 Headcount for October 2021 was 24,150 with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECSE and college -only Running Start students. In October 2021, there were an additional 1,397 students in 11th and 12th grade participating in the Running Start program at different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. Of these students, 517 attended classes only at the college ("college - only") and are excluded from FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District has one of the highest Running Start program participation rates in the state. Based on the enrollment forecasts, permanent facility inventory and capacity, current standard of service, portable capacity, and future additional classroom space, the District plans to continue to satisfy required capacity through the interim use of portables (See Table 5 and Tables 5 a-b-c). While the district currently shows available capacity to address projected need on a purely statistical basis, there are variety of extenuating factors that need to be considered. First, the district is currently undertaking a study to understand how much of our existing physical space capacity is occupied by program needs, present and future. Our current capacity estimate is an accurate depiction of total available space; however, we are aware that it potentially overstates our ability to accommodate actual classroom growth. Our analysis of this program use will not be complete until the completion of this year's plan, but we expect actual available classroom space to be significantly less. Secondly, the Kent School District currently makes significant use of portables, which we do not consider as part of our permanent standard of service. We have included portable space in our capacity figures, but long-term we do not consider that a permanent space solution. Thirdly, Kent is unusual in that is incorporates neighborhoods intersecting with at least 6 municipalities, including Kent, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, Renton, and SeaTac. The district covers 73 square miles and includes over 40 schools. Within this large geographic area, we expect to have pockets of localized capacity need that are not necessarily reflected in the aggregate figures. As one example, the 20 Lakepointe Urban Village development in Covington may require new classroom capacity even as space may exist in schools on the far other end of the district's boundaries. Finally, COVID- 19 has created significant enrollment loss in our community which we believe is temporary; a status shared by most of our neighboring districts. The district is not discontinuing its plans to accommodate for the return of those students, and future normal growth on top of that. 21 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT SCHOOL YEAR 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 1 2024-25 1 2025-26 1 2026-27 1 2027-28 Actual P R O J E C T E D 35,586 0 35,586 0 I 35,586 0 I 35,586 0 I 35,586 0 I 35,586 0 I 35,586 0 Permanent Functional Capacity 1 Changes to Permanent Capacity ' Capacity Increase (F) Additional Permanent Classrooms Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 35,586 35,586 35,586 35,586 35,586 35,586 35,586 "Elementary Portable Capacity Required 3,405 3,405 3,405 3,405 3,405 3,405 3,405 Middle School Portable Capacity Required 315 315 315 315 315 315 315 Senior High School Portable Capacity Required 640 640 640 640 640 640 640 Interim Portable Capacity Total 4,360 4,360 4,360 4,360 4,360 41360 4,360 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 39,946 1 39,946 1 39,946 1 39,946 1 39,946 1 39,946 1 39,946 TOTAL ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 2 1 24,150 1 25,750 1 26,118 26,250 26,225 26,216 1 26,242 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 1 15,796 1 14,196 1 13,828 1 13,696 1 13,721 1 13,730 I 13,704 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2021 ("Medium Growth Model") Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 May 2022 22 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY - Grades K - 6 SCHOOL YEAR 2021-22 2022-23 1 2023-24 1 2024-25 1 2025-26 1 2026-27 1 2027-28 Actual P R O J E C T E D Elementary Permanent Ca acit ' 16,827 16,827 16,827 16,827 16,827 16,827 16,827 Additional Permanent Classrooms 2 0 0 0 0 Subtotal 16,827 16,827 16,827 16,827 0 0 0 16,827 16,827 16,827 Interim Portable Capacity 3,405 3,405 3,405 3,405 3,405 3,405 3,405 TOTAL CAPACITY 112 20,232 20,232 20,232 20,232 20,232 20,232 20,232 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION a 13,049 14,270 14,407 1 14,403 1 14,438 1 14,449 1 14,411 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 7,183 5,962 5,825 1 5,829 1 5,794 1 5,783 1 5,821 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Additional classrooms will be placed at schools with the greatest need for aleve overcrowding 3 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2021 ("Medium Growth Model") Enrollment & Projections reflect FULL Day Kindergarten at ALL Elementary schools @ 1.0 & exclude ECSE Preschoolers. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A May 2022 23 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY MIDDLE SCHOOL - Grades 7 - 8 SCHOOL YEAR 1 2021-22 2022-23 1 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 r 2026-27 1 2027-2028 Actual I P R O J E C T E D Middle School Permanent Capacity 7,635 Chan es to Middle School Capacit7] 0 7,635 7,635 7,635 7,635 7,635 7,635 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal 7,635 7,635 7,635 7,635 7,635 7,635 7,635 Portable Interim Capacity 1 TOTAL CAPACITY ' a s 7,635 7,635 7,635 1 7,635 1 7,635 1 7,635 1 7,635 ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 2 1 3,862 4,079 4,008 1 4,065 1 4,119 1 4,090 1 4,175 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 3,773 3,556 3,627 3,570 3,516 3,545 3,460 No Classroom Portables required at middle schools at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2021 ("Medium Growth Model") 3 Surplus capacity due to grade level reconfiguration - All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B May 2022 24 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH - Grades 9 - 12 SCHOOL YEAR 2021-22 2022-23 1 2023-24 1 2024-25 1 2025-2026 1 2026-27 2027-28 Actual I P R O J E C T E D Senior High Permanent Ca acit 10,582 10,582 10,582 10,582 10,582 10,582 10,582 Chan es to High School Capa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal 10,582 10,582 10,582 10,582 10,582 10,582 10,582 Portables Interim Capacity 1 TOTAL CAPACITY 10,582 10,582 10,582 10,582 1 10,582 10,582 1 10,582 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 7,239 7,401 7,703 7,782 1 71668 1 7,677 1 7,656 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 3,343 3,181 2,879 2,800 2,914 2,905 2,926 No Classroom Portables required at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 3 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2021 ("Medium Growth Model") Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C May 2022 25 VIII - Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2021-2022 through 2027-2028. The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on future bond issues, state school construction assistance, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. In November 2016, the District held a special election to approve the authorization of $252,000,000 in bonding authority. The projects described below are part of this authorization. The first series of bonds ($80 million) were issued in February 2017, which funded the Covington Elementary Replacement School, as well as other infrastructure projects. Impact fees were used at both River Ridge Elementary School and Kent Laboratory Academy projects due to escalation in construction pricing across the Pacific Northwest. According to RCW 82.02.090, the definition of an impact fee is "... a payment of money imposed upon development as a condition of development approval to pay for public facilities needed to serve new growth and development, and that is reasonably related to the new development that creates additional demand and need for public facilities, that is a proportionate share of the cost of the public facilities, and that is used for facilities that reasonably benefit the new development. Impact fee' does not include a reasonable permit or application fee." Mitigation or impact fees can be calculated on the basis of "unhoused student need" or "the maintenance of a district's level of service" as related to new residential development. A mitigation/impact fee may be imposed based upon a determination of insufficient existing permanent and/or interim portable school space or to pay for permanent and/or newly acquired interim portable school space previously constructed as a result of growth in the district. A district's School Board must first approve the application of the mitigation or impact fees and, in turn, approval must then be granted by the other genera► government jurisdictions having responsibility within the district, counties, cities and towns. (Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac) Though the current enrollment projections increase for both elementary and secondary schools are relatively flat, the ongoing need to provide permanent instructional facilities to house students is a driving need as the shifts in our family populations continue, due to ongoing development. Previously collected Impact fees may be used to support and address the challenges related to the number of interim instructional facilities currently in use, the replacement of some of these aged facilities, the maintenance of the district's level of services, and the potential expansions to existing facilities in future years. The Kent School District 2021-2022 CFP update includes continued execution of the 2016 Capital Bond Projects and anticipation of the data collection and review of our Facility Assessment Reports within the coming months. With the opening of our River Ridge Elementary School and the Kent Laboratory Academy, we are advancing opportunities to add capacity for our programs and student - based needs. The District Facilities and Capital Planning Teams have been preparing to complete an initial plan (Spring 2022) as we move the next steps of creating a Capital Bond Planning Task Force (CBPTF) — which will include District personnel, design professionals, teaching staff, student voice as well as community members to being well collaborated discussions to this platform. Our initial plan has revealed priorities including school replacement due to age, and the need for added permanent facilities to (1) reduce and eliminate our need for portables and (2) accommodate future growth as housing in the Kent region continues to expand. Once the CBPTF has it will be brought before the District's Board of Directors for comments, discussion, and approval. A Capital Bond Measure would follow soon after approval. Future updates to this Capital Facilities Plan will include details of any adopted planning. For the Six -Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Capital Planning Team. Please see pages 13-14 for a summary of the cost basis. Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction estimated costs are based on the last elementary school built in Kent, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost future elementary school, as well as average pricing of nearby school districts recently built new middle and new high school projects. Project Projected Cost New Elementary School $68,000,000 New Middle School $155,000,000 New High School $220,000,000 Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. District Adjustment The impact fee calculations on Appendix B & C result in a zero -dollar impact fee total for this year but may be adjusted if needed per RCW 36.70A.130(2)(b) provision. KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 SIX_VPAP PINANCF PI AN Secured Local & State Unsecured State Z or Local 3 Impact Fees 5 SCHOOL FACILITIES 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 TOTAL Estimated Estimated PERMANENT FACILITIES so so No School Projects at this time. TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional portables 3"0 OTHER N/A Totals $0 $0 $o $0 $0 so $0 so $o $0 so ' F = Funded U = Unfunded NOTES: 2 The District anticipates receiving some State Funding Construction Assistance for some projects. 3 Facility needs are pending review. Some of these projects may be funded with impact fees. 4 Cost of portables based on current cost and adjusted for inflation for future years. s Fees in this column are based on amount of fees collected to dale and estimated fees on future units. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 6 May 2022 Type & # on Map Elementary KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.416 Site Acquisitions & Costs Average of Sites Purchased, Sold or Built on within last 10 Years 12 / Urban Properly Sale-29.7 acres of Plemons-Yeh site 7 / Rural Property Sale - Scarsella site 3 / Rural Property Sale - Old Covington Parcel A. #362206-9001 3 / Rural Property Sale - Old Covington Parcel, #362206-9081 6 / Rural Property purchased for new elementary Middle School Senior High No Acquisitions for Middle School No Acquisitions for Senior Highs Note: All rural sites were purchased prior to adoption of Urban Growth Area Numbers wrresocnd to locations on Site Bank & Acquisitions Map on Page 17. 1 / Urban Site - Covington area North (So of Mattson MS) 2 / Rural Site - Ham Lake east (Pollard) 4 / Urban Site - Shady Lake (Sowers-Blaine-Drahota-Parolins) 5 / Rural Site - SE of Lake Morton area (West properly) 10 / Urban Site -Yeh-Williams (W of 132 Ave BE at BE 288) 12 / Urban Site - BE 256th Covington (Helleson) 12. / Urban Site - 156th Ave. BE Covington (Wikstrom) Year Open / Purchased R:ff9f7" 2016 SSE 124th Ave and 284th ST BE 29.70 $947,536 $31,904 2015 2900 Kent Black Diamond RD BE 13.25 $330,000 $24,906 2019 17070 BE Wax Rd, Covington 8.00 $3,869,697 $483,712 2021 17070 SE Wax Rd. Covington 8.00 $4,230,082 $528,760 2019 s lots purchased Military Road South SeaTac WA 10.00 $1,770,355 $177,036 Elementary Site Subtotal 68.95 $11.147,670 $161,678 Elam i. average 0.00 $0 Middle School Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 Middle schl site Avg. 0.00 $0 $0 Senior High Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 Sr HI Site Aver e 1984 1992 Total Acreage 8 Cosl Total Average Cost / Acre 1995 68.95 $11,147,670 $161,678 1993 1999 2000 2004 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 7 May 2022 30 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors - Single Family Student Generation Factors - Multi -Family Elementary (Grades K - 6) 0.270 Elementary 0.082 Middle School (Grades 7 - 8) 0.105 Middle School 0.035 Senior High (Grades 9 - 12) 0.075 Senior High 0.029 Total 0.450 Total 0.146 Projected Increased Student Capacity Elementary 0 Middle School 850 Senior High (Academy) 0 Required Site Acreage per Facility Elementary (required) 12 Middle School (required) 25 Senior High (required) 40 New Facility Construction Cost Elementary $68,000,000 Middle School $155,000,000 Senior High $220,000,000 Temporary Facility Square Footage Elementary 123,702 Middle School 10,256 Senior High 21,296 Total 4.4% 155,254 Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary 1,567,594 Middle School 760,483 Senior High/Other 1,077,315 Total 95.6% 3,405,392 Total Facilities Square Footage Elementary 1,691,296 Middle School 770,739 Senior High/Other 1,098,611 Total 3,560,646 Developer Provided Sites / Facilities Value 0 Dwelling Units 0 OSPI - Square Footage per Student, see side cha Elementary 115 Middle School 148 Senior High 173 Special Education ?? Average Site Cost / Acre Elementary $161,678 Middle School $0 Senior High $0 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost Elementary @ 24 $315,000 Middle School @ 29 $315,000 Senior High @ 31 $315,000 State Funding Assistance Credit District Funding Assistance Percentage 51.86% Construction Cost Allocation CCA - Cost/Sq, Ft. $246.83 District Average Assessed Value Single Family Residence $574,784 District Average Assessed Value Multi -Family Residence $360,790 Bond Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 $0.93 Current Rate / 1,000 Tax Rate 0.0009 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Current Bond Interest Rate 2.45% CPI Inflation Factor 4.70% Per OSPI Website Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX A) May 2022 31 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage Average Site CostlAcre I Facility Capacity I Student Factor A 1 (Elementary) 12 $161,678 0 0,270 A 2 (Middle School) 25 $0 850 0.105 $0.00 A 3 (Senior High) 40 $0 0 0.075 Total 77 $161,678 850 0.450 A $0.00 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent(Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary) $68,000,000 0 0.270 0.903 B 2 (Middle School) $155,000,000 850 0.105 0.984 $18,840.71 B 3 (Senior High) $220 000 000 0 0.075 0.998 Total $443,000,000 850 0.450 B {' $18,840.71 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence (Portables) Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $315,000 24 0.270 0.097 $343.74 C 2 (Middle School) $315,000 29 0.105 0.016 $18.25 C 3 (Senior High) $315,000 31 0.075 0.020 $15.24 Total $945,000 84 0.450 C $377.23 State Funding Assistance Credit per Single Family Residence (formerly "State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor Construction cost Allocation SPI Sq. Ft. / Student Assistance % Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $246.83 115 0.5186 0.270 $3,974.59 D 2 (Middle School) $246.83 148 0.5186 0.105 $1,989.21 D 3 (Senior High) $246.83 173 0.5186 0.075 $1,660.88 D $7,624.68 Tax Credit per Single Famil Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value (AAV) $574,784 Net Present Value (per EQ) (NPV) 8.77 Current Debt Service Rate / 1,000 ( r) 0.09% TC b $4,675.64 (Below used to calculate NPV) Current Bond Interest Rate 2.45% Years Amortized (10 Years)- Used in NPV Calculation 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility/ Site Value Dwellin Units 0 0 FC -0 0 Fee Recap ** A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence Subtotal D = State Match Credit per Residence TC = Tax Credit per Residence Subtotal Total Unfunded Need 50% Developer Fee Obligation FC = Facility Credit (if applicable) District Adjustment Net Fee Obligation per Residence - Single Family $0.00 $18,840.71 $377.23 $19,217.94 $7,624.68 $4,675.64 $12,300.32 $6,917.62 $3,459 $0 ($3,459 $0.00 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX B) Revised —June 2022 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre I Facility Capacity I Student Factor A 1 (Elementary) 12 $161,678 0 0.082 A 2 (Middle School) 25 $0 850 0.035 $0.00 A 3 (Senior High) 40 $0 0 0.029 Total 77 $161,678 850 0,146 A $0.00 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent / Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary) $68,000,000 0 0.082 0.903 B 2 (Middle School) $155,000,000 850 0.035 0.984 $6,280.24 B 3 (Senior High) $220,000,000 0 0.029 0.998 Total $443,000,000 850 0.146 B { $6,280.24 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $315,000 24 0.082 0.097 $104.40 C 2 (Middle School) $315,000 29 0.035 0.016 $6.08 C 3 (Senior High) $315,000 31 0.029 0.020 $5.89 Total $945,000 84 0,146 C K $116.37 State Funding Assistance Credit per Multi -Family Residence (formerly "State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance SPI Sq. Ft. / Student Equalization % Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $246.83 115 0.5186 0.082 $1,207.10 D 2 (Middle School) $246.83 148 0,5186 0.035 $663.07 D 3 (Senior High) $246.83 173 0.5186 0.029 $642.21 D b $2,512.37 Tax Credit per Multi Famil f Residence Average MF Residential Assessed Value (AAV) $360,790 Net Present Value (per EQ) (NPV) 8.77 Current Debt Service Rate / 1,000 ( r) 0.09 % TC b $2,934,88 (Below used to calculate NPV) Current Bond Interest Rate 2.45% Years Amortized (10 Years)- Used in NPV Calculation 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC b 0 Fee Recap ** A = Site Acquisition per Multi -Family Unit B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit D = State Match Credit per MF Unit TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit Subtotal Subtotal $0.00 $6,280.24 $116.37 $6,396.61 $2, 512.37 $2, 934.88 $5,447.26 Total Unfunded Need $949.35 50% Developer Fee Obligation FC = Facility Credit (if applicable) District Adjustment Net Fee Obligation per Residential Unit- Multi -family $475 ($475) $0.00 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX C) Revised —June 2022 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity Projected SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE LOCATION Type Status Completion Date Projected % for Program new Capacity Growth Approximate I Approximate ELEMENTARY Map Map MIDDLE SCHOOL & SENIOR HIGH Additional TEMPORARY FACILITIES71 Capacity Portables' #on Land Use 2 OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Designation Type Land Use Jurisdiction Map 12 256th - Covington (Halleson) 25435 SE 256th, Covington 98042 Rural To be sold King County 12a 156th - Covington (Wikstrom) 25847 156th Ave. SE, Covington 98042 Rural To be sold King County Notes: ' TBD - To be determined - Some sites are identified but placement, timing and/or configuration of portables has not been determined. Z Numbers correspond to sites on Site Bank Map on Page 19. Other Map site locations are parcels identified in Table 7 on Page 29. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 May 2022 34 Fairwood ■ Elementary - Fairwood' McMICKENNTS j � - C rriage Crest - Ridgewood Cedar Mountain I h- SEATAC .. A �Orliila ■Elementary- ■Elementary f • j - Northwood Middle School - Cedar GroveMeeker - - ■ Middle School Lake Youngs 147 " P A N T ILE R Elementary Glenridg. ■ �\ Springbroo Elementary A AC ■ Elementa - ' LAN! \ - - Kent Laboratory A chaol ch - HiEmerald ode Y ®� -- ! ■a O'Brien Panther Lake gar ■ Elementaryj KF T ElementarySoos Creek Elementary�19fL■River ■ ptti■6 r1l, Ridge i.■ Eementary Sunrise Elementary Ij Park Orchard i Elementary Elementary Meridian - _ �� ■ `— '. East Hill Middle School ■ MIII Creek 1 ■' 1 }_ Middle School'. Elementary Kent - _ t \ - elementary - y( Valley j• ■1_, _ - ■ Earl Ken "' Center Meridian Daniel Martin - 2 Mattson Middle School ■Elementary Sor[un ❑ an ■Elementary Cres ood - , �- \ �/ High \East School Hill ■Elementary Kent School District __ - �.�_-- Administration Wilderness - Center _ Ill ra - ■ - ■ Center . ■ MCYidian The Outreach Elementa g 1ief�ts n ton ood a tary High School Scenic Hill ■:Program (TOP) 2� -Cedar Valle Y Elementary Jenkins Creek Elementary _ Elementary, I mentary ■ Millen lam / ■ Cedar Heights School STAR ElehSent — JMiddle LAKE - ■ Pine Tree Horizon - -- - -- - Meadow Ridge, Thomas Elementary Elementary .Elementary ■ - ■- Covington . - � - - - 6 - Berrydale Grass Lake ■ Elementary 1 O (Sons) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT - Kentlake High School - SITE ACQUISITIONS - ■ lee Hill 5 eY Woods Elementary- ■ Elementary Wynaeo JO ®copyright KROLL MAP COMPANY, INC. Ants map nos peen moatttea oy nay.Iic, IX - Summary of Changes to June 2021 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the June 2021 Plan are summarized here. Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in class size ratio as well as program changes. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect use, lease or purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement between facilities. The district worked with contractor Davis Demographics, LLC to update student generation factors. The updated rates are included in the body of the Plan. The student headcount enrollment forecast is updated annually. All Elementary schools now have Full Day Kindergarten so six -year Kindergarten projections were previously modified to meet the requirements for Full Day Kindergarten programs at all elementary schools. The district expects to receive some State Funding Assistance (formerly called "state matching funds") for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded site and facility needs will be reviewed in the future. The impact fees for 2022 calendar year will result in a zero -dollar impact fee for both Single - Family and Multi -Family due to reduced enrollment and the new capacity study completed in 2021. X - Appendices Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors Include: ITEM Grade/ Type FROM TO Increase/ Comments Decrease Student Generation Factor Elem 0.277 0.270 -0.007 Single Family (SF) MS 0.071 0.105 0.034 SH 0.086 0.075 -0.011 Total 0.434 0.450 0.016 Increase Student Generation Factor Elem 0.258 0.082 -0.176 Multi -Family (MF) MS 0.058 0.035 -0.023 SH 0.100 0.029 -0.071 Total 0.416 0.146 -0.270 Decrease State Funding Assistance Ratios ("State Match") 53.79% 52.49% -1.30% Per OSPI Website Area Cost Allowance $242.26 $246.83 4.570 Per OSPI Website Link Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SF $268,271 $574,784 306,513 Per King County AV - Average of Condominiums & Apts. MF $226,726 $360,790 134,064 Per King County bt Service Capital Levy Rate / $1000 $1.41 $0.93 ($0.48) Per King Co. Assessor Report General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 2.44% Impact Fee - Single Family SF $5,818.06 Impact Fee - Multi -Family MF $2,457.53 2.45% 0.01% Bond Buyers 20 year GO Index Removed due to $0.00 ($5,818.06) Capacity/Enrollment Factors Removed due to $0.00 ($2,457.53) Capacity/Enrollment Factors FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Each Scholar: A voice. A dream. A BRIGHT future. Lake Grove Elementary Thomas Jefferson High School Olympic View K-8 School Mirror Lake Elementary Wildwood Elementary Memorial Field Renovation CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2023 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN May 24, 2022 BOARD OF EDUCATION Hiroshi Eto, President Trudy Davis, Vice President and WIAA Representative Luckisha Phillips, Legislative Representative Dr. Jennifer Jones Quentin Morris SUPERINTENDENT Dr. Dani Pfeiffer Prepared by: Jeri Carlson, Chief Finance & Operations Officer, Interim Sally McLean, Facilitator Jennifer Thomas, Student & Demographic Forecaster FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS I INTRODUCTION 2-3 SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction 4 Inventory of Educational Facilities 5 Inventory of Non -Instructional Facilities 6 Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities 7 Needs Forecast - New Facilities 8 Six Year Finance Plan 9 SECTION 2 MAPS Introduction 10 Map — City and County Jurisdictions 11 SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction 12 Building Capacities 13-15 Portable Locations 16-17 Student Forecast 18-20 SECTION 4 KING COUNTY, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, AND CITY OF KENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Introduction 21 Capacity Summaries 22-26 Impact Fee Calculations 27 Six Year Finance Plan 28-29 Student Generation Rates 30 Impact Fee Changes from 2022 to 2023 31 1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB) 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, City of Kent Ordinance No.4278 effective June 2018, revised December 2021, and the City of Auburn Ordinance No. 5078 effective 1998, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2022. This plan is scheduled to be submitted for consideration to each of the jurisdictions located with the Federal Way Public Schools' service area: King County, the City of Kent, City of Federal Way and the City of Auburn and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is requested to be included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The City of Des Moines collects school impact fees as part of the SEPA process. Discussions with the City of Milton to adopt an ordinance for school impact fees for parcels located within the Federal Way School District's service area is in process. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council for Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing, jobs, services, culture, and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies or management need. During the 2016-17 school year the District formed a 100 member Facilities Planning Committee consisting of parents, community members and staff. The Committee was tasked with developing a recommendation to the Superintendent regarding Phase 2 of the District's plan for school construction, remodeling, and/or modernization for voter consideration in November 2017. The voters passed this $450M bond authorization with a 62% YES vote reflecting a commitment to invest in the modernization of our infrastructure. Through the committee's work a determination was made to rebuild Thomas Jefferson High School, Illahee Middle School, Evergreen Middle School, Lake Grove Elementary, Mirror Lake Elementary, Olympic View Elementary, Star Lake Elementary, and Wildwood Elementary. In addition to the school projects, the committee included a plan to modernize Memorial Stadium, which currently supports athletic activities for all schools. The rebuilding of the schools will create additional capacity for students at the elementary and high school levels. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION, continued The District continues to monitor factors that may have an impact on enrollment and capacity at our schools, including new single-family and multi -family residential developments and any impacts due to the COVID-19 stay home order. In accordance with the McCleary decision, the State has provided funding to reduce K-3 class size to 17 and 4-12 class size to 25. Beginning in 2019-20 the legislature expects compliance with this funding adding pressure to the need for elementary capacity. In response to this need the district has acquired a commercial building to renovate into classrooms to provide permanent additional capacity. As a result of the combination of recently added new capacity in the District and lower enrollment due to COVID-19 (and associated lower enrollment projections), the 2023 Capital Facilities Plan reflects no unhoused scholars by the end of the six year planning period. As such, this year's CFP does not include a school impact fee request. However, it is important to note that the Fall 2022 kindergarten registrations at the time of this writing is on track to be the highest it has ever been. The District plans to closely monitor enrollment and associated needs and reserves the right to amend the 2023 CFP and impact fee calculation as appropriate. House Bill 1356 prompted school districts across the state, including Federal Way Public Schools, to reflect and consider the appropriateness of their school mascots. We recognized the importance of partnership in this process and were fortunate to engage with local tribal leaders to help us determine what changes needed to happen in our district for schools with names and mascots connected to Native American identities as a result, several of our schools now have new mascots: • Illahee Middle School Royals • Sacajawea Middle School Nighthawks • Woodmont K-8 Snow Leopards • Evergreen Middle School Grizzlies In June 2021, the decision was made to rename Totem Middle School, and we began the process of identifying the new name of the school. In November 2021, that process concluded when the FWPS Board of Directors approved the scholar -recommended name Evergreen Middle School. This process incorporated the voices of scholars, teachers, community members, and local tribal leaders. We are proud to move forward with this new name to help undo the disrespectful use and cultural appropriation of Native American identity in our community. 3 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. A Financial Plan that shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization listed follows this. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (K-5) Adelaide 1635 SW 3041" St Federal Way 98023 Brigadoon 3601 SW 3361" St Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 2981" St Auburn 98001 Enterprise 35101 51" Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Green Gables 32607 47"' Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308"' St Auburn 98001 Lake Grove 303 SW 308t" St Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35827 32°d Ave S Auburn 98001 Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Rd Federal Way 98003 Meredith Hill 5830 S 300"' St Auburn 98001 Mirror Lake 625 S 314"' St Federal Way 98003 Nautilus (K-8) 1000 S 289t" St Federal Way 98003 Olympic View 2626 SW 3271" St Federal Way 98023 Panther Lake 34424 1" Ave S Federal Way 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368"' St Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 34600 12"' Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Silver Lake 1310 SW 3251" Pl Federal Way 98023 Star Lake 4014 S 270"' St Kent 98032 Sunnycrest 24629 42" d Ave S Kent 98032 Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320"' St Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42°d Ave S Auburn 98001 Wildwood 2405 S 300t" St Federal Way 98003 Woodmont (K-8) 26454 16t" Ave S Des Moines 98198 MIDDLE SCHOOLS (6-8) Federal Way Public Academy (6-10) 34620 9`h Ave S Federal Way 98003 Illahee 36001 1"Ave S Federal Way 98003 Kilo 4400 S 308`h St Auburn 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 314"' St Federal Way 98023 Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Rd Federal Way 98003 Sequoyah 3450 S 360''' ST Auburn 98001 Evergreen 26630 401" Ave S Kent 98032 TAF cr Saghalie (6-12) 33914 19"' Ave SW Federal Way 98023 HIGH SCHOOLS (9-12) Decatur 2800 SW 320"' St Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 30611 16' Ave S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288" St Auburn 98001 Todd Beamer 35999 16' Ave S Federal Way 98003 Career Academy at Truman 31455 28"' Ave S Federal Way 98003 ADDITIONAL SCHOOLS Internet Academy (K-12) 31455 28t' Ave S Federal Way 98003 Employment Transition Program (12+) 33250 21" Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Federal Way Open Doors 31455 28' Ave S Federal Way 98003 Former DeVry Property (K-5) 3600 S 344th Way, Federal Way 98001 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CURRENT INVENTORY NON -INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Developed Property Central Kitchen 1214 S 332" d Federal Way 98003 Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308t1i St Federal Way 98003 Educational Services Center 33330 8th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Support Services Center 1211 S 332" d St Federal Way 98003 Leased Property Early Learning Center at Uptown 1066 S 320th St Federal Way 98003 Square Undeveloped Property Site Location 75 SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW — 9.2 Acres 65 S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S — 8.8 Acres 60 E of IOth Avenue SW - SW 334th & SW 335th Streets - 10.04 Acres 73 N of SW 320th and east of 451h PL SW — 23.45 Acres 71 S 344th Street & 46th Avenue S - 17.47 Acres 82 1" Way S and S 342°d St — Minimal acreage 96 S 308th St and 141h Ave S — .36 Acres Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. I FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES PHASE EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS As Purchase and Relocate Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is needed Portables Impact Fees. Thomas Jefferson High Replace Existing Building, Voter Approved Capital bond II School Increase Capacity II Illahee Middle School Replace Existing Building Voter Approved Capital bond II Evergreen Middle School Replace Existing Building Voter Approved Capital bond Lake Grove Elementary Replace Existing Building, Voter Approved Capital bond II Increase Capacity Mark Twain Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD, pending SCAP funding II Increase Capacity Mirror Lake Elementary Replace Existing Building, Voter Approved Capital bond II Increase Capacity Olympic View K-8 School Replace Existing Building, Voter Approved Capital bond II Increase Capacity Star Lake Elementary Replace Existing Building, Voter Approved Capital bond II Increase Capacity Wildwood Elementary Replace Existing Building, Voter Approved Capital bond II Increase Capacity II Memorial Stadium Replace Existing Facility Voter Approved Capital bond DeVry Property Temp Swing School SCAP and K-3 Class size II Increase Capacity reduction funding Decatur High School Replace Existing Building, TBD 1[[ Increase Capacity III Kilo Middle School Replace Existing Building TBD Ill Saca'awea Middle School Replace Existing Building TBD Adelaide Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD III Increase Capacity Brigadoon Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD 111 Increase Capacity Camelot Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD III Increase Capacity Lake Dolloff Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD III Increase Capacity Nautilus K-8 School Replace Existing Building, TBD III Increase Capacity Twin Lakes Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD III Increase Capacity Woodmont K-8 School Replace Existing Building, TBD [II Increase Capacity As part of the multi -phase modernization and replacement plan, the District intends to increase capacity for elementary and high school students with expansion at the Thomas Jefferson, Lake Grove, Mirror Lake, Olympic View, Star Lake, and Wildwood sites. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST - ADDITIONAL FACILITIES NEW FACILITY I LOCATION I ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS No current plans for additional facilities. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Six Year Finance Plan Secured Funding Sources Im t Fees 1 $144 848 Land Sale Fonda 2 $481 774 Bond or Le - Fuade 3 S125,973,394 K3-CSR & TAFA anclaimed ex ditwes 4 S12,106,119 School Conatnxtion Assistance Pro am SCAP 5 S33.980 652 TOTAL. 5171723'34 Projected Revenue Sources School Construction A isistance Program, SCAP 6 S79 213.000 K-3 Class Size Reduction 7 S486.000 Bond Funds 8 so Laced Fund Sates 9 SO 1m ct Fees 10 SO TOTAL S79,699,000 Actual and Planned Expenditures Total Secured Funding and Projected Revenue IS231,422,1234 NEW SCHOOLS 64iidW:oud Budget 2023 3024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Total i:60C: ::pa')pry29i$: 2022--23 2023-24 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-20'.8 2028-2029 2022-2029 NIODERN17AITON AND FINTANSION 5::::::':-i Lake Groce Element - I I :;: SiS. Iijlp SO 500 000 5-- hlirror Lake Elemaotary 11 : ; $4i M $5S4100,000 Star Lake Element 11.E ::: g39f 300 SO660500 Wildsood Element 11' :: �tD OQ n SO 00 000OI c Vies K-8 School 11 ::... 74 0{!p S24 376 000 S1 7 30 000 S31.126 000'00 000`a homas lefferaoa Hi School 11 ::Sl1i735S ij6U S17743000 S1774],OQO 12' 000 Ever sea Mdddla School 11 :.:SW?13 3p0 $0 S66 711 " Illahee NEMe School 11 :: 4.'M OUO S9.035 000 Sig 843 000 $10 870 000 S'• 9.798 c00 S82 000 000 hlemorial Stadium 11- ::::5:904D0 S29610000 S29.610000 $29 D00 so S0 SO so SI71 AC ULSMON Former DeG :ES 24 12 :tE ?76;3D0 Si 421 31M S1,421,0001 SI 423 000 51,422.250 Sl 423 750 S1,422,2D 0 Sl 422,750 S9 95fi 500 $30 733 000 TENEPORARY FACB,I'1'1PS Portables 13 SO TOTAL :S37Cr 269 '00 587'37 +00 S63 014 O110 S12 '93 000 Sl 422'S0 Sl 423 750 Sl 422 250 Sl 422,7601 S168 235 : $'e-13 505"040 NOTES_ 1. These fees are currently being held in a King County, City of Federal Way, City of Auburn, and City of Kent impact fee account, and will be available for use by the District for system improvements. This is year end balance on 12131121. 2. This is year end balance on 12131121. 3. This is the 12131121 balance of bond funds and capital levy funds, This figure includes interest earnings. 4. This represents the K3-CSR revnue received but not spent as of 1213112021. 5. This represents the balance of SCAP funding as of 1213112021 S. This is anticipated SCAP for the future projects authorized by the voters in 2017. 7. This is a secured K-3 Class size reduction grant. 8. In November 2017, the District passed a$450M bond measure. The amount included in the finance plan is for projects that will create additional capacity. Only the costs associated with increasing capacity are included in school impact fee calculations. Seepage- 9. There are no projected sale of surplus properties. 10. In this current plan, there are no projected impact fees. 11. Project budgets are updated as of December 2021. Budgets for Illahee Middle School, Olympic View K-6, and Memorial Stadium budgets are still being updated. Evergreen middle School, Illahee Middle School, Olympic View K-8, Memorial Stadium, and DeVry 12. A former private university campus located in Federal Way was purchased in 2018 to provide up to 43 additional permanent elementary classrooms. Prior to creating new permanent capcity this location will be used as a temporary housing. These costs are excluded from impact fee calculations. 13. These fees represent the cost of purchasing and installing new portables. The portable expenditure in future years may replace existing portables that are not functional. These may not increase capacity and are not included in the capacity summary. ri FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 2 - MAPS Federal Way Public Schools has twenty-one elementary schools (grades K-5), two schools with a K-8 grade configuration, six middle school schools (grades 6-8), four high schools (grades 9-12) and four small secondary schools. The Federal Way Public Academy serves students in grades 6-10. The programs at Open Doors and Career Academy at Truman High School serves students in grades 9-12. In addition to these programs, TAF@Saghalie serves students in grades 6-12 who reside within the service area and the Employment and Transition Program (ETP) at the Norman Center serves 18-21-year-old scholars. The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School districts are different. If the district does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single development. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the district and is not taken lightly. It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. The final map included represents the city and county boundaries which overlap with the district's service areas. • City of Algona • City of Auburn • City of Des Moines • City of Federal Way • City of Kent • City of Milton • Unincorporated King County 10 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN MAP — CITY AND COUNTY JURISDICTIONS fEDE"L WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Each Scholar: A voice, A dream. A BRIGHT future. Puget Sound i o 0.5 � a Miles 11 MOM Des Moines i i i :r yr Auburn r e Federal Wa_yr 1 ,F King County il, � 6 City and County Jurisdictions FWPS boundaries is 100% Urban Growth Area FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities - The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast — 2023 through 2029 12 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING CAPACITIES This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. In general, the District's current target class size provides that the average class size for a standard classroom for grades K through 3 should be 17 students to comply with current legislation. In grades 4-5 the target is 25 students. For grades 6 to 12 the target class size is 26 students. Classrooms for students with Individualized Education Program (Special Education) needs are calculated at 12 seats per classroom. Historically, the District has used the OSPI square footage calculation as a baseline for capacity calculation and made adjustments for specific program needs. The District will continue to use this calculation for determining capacity at our middle and high schools. However, for elementary school capacity will be calculated based on the number of classroom spaces and the number of students assigned to each classroom. Class Size Guidelines FWPS Historical "Standard of Service" HB2661/SHB2776 Enacted Law Square Footage Guideline Kindergarten 18.9 17 25-28 Grades 1-2 18.9 17 25-28 Grade 3 18.9 17 28 Grades 4-5 25 25 28 For the purposes of determining student capacity at individual schools, the following list clarifies adjustments to classroom spaces and the OSPI calculation. Special Education Resource Rooms: Each middle school requires the use of a standard classroom(s) for special education students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. English as a Second Language Programs: Each middle school and high school requires the use of a standard classroom for students learning English as a second language. Middle School Computer Labs: Each middle school has computer labs, except Evergreen Middle School. Wireless access has been installed at all secondary schools. If additional classroom space is needed, these computer labs may be converted to mobile carts. 13 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING CAPACITIES, continued High School Career Development and Learning Center (Resource) Room: Each high school provides special education resource room and career development classrooms for students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. Preschool/ECEAP: Our district currently offers preschool programs for both special needs & typically developing students at 9 elementary schools. We also have the ECEAP program at 10 sites (6 elementary schools, 3 high schools, and 1 commercial sites). These programs decrease capacity at those schools. Alternative Learning Experience: Federal Way offers students the opportunity to participate in an Alternative Learning Experience through our Internet Academy. These students have never been included in the capacity calculation of unhoused students. Due to COVID 19 implementing school closures the District has had a sharp increase in IA enrollment. 1418 Youth Reengagement: Federal Way offers students the opportunity to participate in 1418 Youth Reengagement Open Doors program. These students are housed at the Truman campus but are not currently included in the capacity calculation of unhoused students. 14 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING CAPACITIES, continued ELEAUNTARY BUILDING IVIiDDLE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY PROGR4hI CAPACITY School Name Headcount 'Preschool Adelaide 353 30 Bri adoon 299 30 Camelot 277 30 Enterprise 345 15 Green Gables 401 Lake Dolloff 400 3Lake Grove 600 Lakeland 371 Mark Twain 430 Meredith ill 37S 30 3l4firror Lake 600 Nautilus -8 466 Olympic View 353 Panther Lake 347 Rainier View 405 30 Sherwood Forest 390 6 Silver Lake 400 Star Lake 337 Sunn •crest 405 Twin Lakes 341 30 Valhalla 406 'Wildwood 600 30 Woodmont -S 357 TOTAL 9,258 231 School Name Headcount Illahee 855 Kilo 779 Lakota 786 Sacaawea 694 Se uo ah M5 Evergreen 795 T-1F @ Saghalie 598 Fedet-d Way Public Academy 183 TOTAL 5,275 *Yiiddle School A`era a 727 HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING PROGILAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount Decatur 1243 Federal Way 1684 Thomas Jefferson 1224 Todd Beamer 1085 TAF Q; Saghalie 155 Career Academy at Truman 159 Federal Way Public Academy 116 Employment Transition Program 48 TOT.1I 5,714 Elementary Afera a 40-1 High School Average 1,309 Notes: 'Preschool enrollment reduces capacity for K-5 students. 15 preschool students in one classroom. 'Federal Way Public Academy; Career Academy at Truman High School, and Employment Transition Program and T.AF / Saghalie for the high school school grade span (9-12) are non -boundary schools. These schools are not used in the calculated averages. ' Lake Grove and Wildwood opened January 2021; Minor Lake is opened September 2021 15 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not an efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as interim measures to house students when increasing population impacts a school attendance area. Portables may also be required to house students when new or changing programs require additional capacity. They also provide housing for students until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. With the launch of construction of new schools, a number of portables will be relocated, decommissioned, or sold. These numbers are not available at this time. Since 2018, the District has reduced the number of instructional portables by 33 classrooms. The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. 16 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS, continued PORTABLES LOCATED PORTABLES LOCATED AT FT.FATFYf.ARV SCHOOLS AT HIGH SCHOOLS ENTRECnruL ... IMSil NCTIONhU Adelaide 2 1 Brigadoon 1 Camelot 1 Enterprise Green Gables 1 Lake Dolloff 4 1 Lake Grove Lakeland Sark Train 3 Nferedith Hill 3 Mirror Lake Nautilus. 3 01ym is view 2 Panther Lake 4 Paimer V tear 5 Shen-ood Forest i t Silver Lake 1 3 Star Lake Sunnycrest 6 Tv,-m Lakes 1 2 'Valhalla a Wildwood WoDdmont PORTABLES LOCATED AT ATIT)DLF SCHOOLS uSTRECTiuu mom usr REcnruL Itlahea 2 1 Kito 1 6 Lakota Sacajawea 5 Sequoyah 1 1 Evergreen T ,g Saghatle 4 TOTAL. 13 3 17 mom Decatur 8 1 Federal NVay Thomas Jefferson Todd Beamer 9 TOTAL 16 1 PORT ABLE S LOCATED AT SUPPORT FACILITIES MOT TDC 9 Former _ - TOTAL 9 DISTRICT PORTABLES IN USE FOR ECEAP INDIOR HEADSTART Shenvwd Forest Totem Total FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN STUDENT FORECAST Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school -building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students. The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on birth rates within the district's census tracts and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. In January 2022, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District. The model used to forecast next year's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county -wide average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections. The long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes in the 5-19 age group for King County. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN STUDENT FORECAST, continued Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of something else (e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend for the school -age population over time. The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2029. This model produces a projection that is between 20,000 and 19,500 when applied to the low, medium, and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models. Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington. Near term projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by current local economic conditions. The District tracks new development from five permitting jurisdictions. Long range planning assumes a student yield from proposed new housing consistent with historical growth patterns. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school district community in the future. As a result of COVID-19, the District has experienced a significant increase in Internet Academy scholars: IA Headcount Elementary School Middle School High School Total Nov-19 12 59 205 276 Nov-20 159 147 250 556 Nov-21 349 227 342 918 Temp Increase 337 168 137 642 The District's six year enrollment projections show an overall decline in enrollment, and a decline at each grade level. The COVID-19 pandemic affected enrollment in recent years, as well as increased enrollment in the Internet Academy. The District plans to monitor actual enrollment growth in the 2022-23 school year to assess the validity of the projections, particularly post -pandemic. Any changes will be reflected in future updates to this CFP. 19 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN STUDENT FORECAST, continued October 1 Head Count Enrollment Histolj- and Projections Calendar Yr School Year Elementary Middle School High School Total K -12 reJ cof Oia► 2017 2016-17 10,472 5,165 6;992 22,629 2018 2017-18 10,4-t9 5,229 6,841 22,519 -05% 2019 2018-19 10;191 5,181 6,966 22,338 -0.8% 2020 2019-20 91965 5,366 6,780 22,111 -1.0% 2021 2020-21 9,357 5,326 6,680 21,363 -3_5% 2022 2021-22 9,412 5,097 6,755 217264 -0.5 % 2023 B2022-23 9,051 4,630 6,463 20,144 -5.6% 202-4 P2023-24 9,015 4,611 6,437 20,063 -0.4% 2025 P2024-2S 8,961 4,584 6,399 19,943 -06% 2026 P2025-26 8,907 4,556 6,360 19,823 -0.6% 2027 P2026-2' 8,84S 4,524 C316 19,685 -0_7% 2028 P2027 28 8,8S3 4,S29 6,322 19,704 0.1 % 2029. P2028-29 3,907 4,SS6 6,360 19,823 0.6% Elementaq K--S Middle School 6-8 High SchM 9-12 Irdm*s Open Dears a,0Inter wi Aca&im Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast 23,000 22,50D 22,000 21,500 21,000 20,500 20,000 19,500 19,000 School Year 20 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 4 — KING COUNTY, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, AND CITY OF KENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Capacity Summaries Site & Construction Costs Allocations Student Generation Rates Impact Fee Calculations Reference to Impact Fee Calculations 21 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARIES All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information, Portable Capacity information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The District has recently adjusted its capacity calculation method for Elementary schools to better show capacity needed to comply with the K-3 Class Size Reduction. This adjustment is also shown in the portable capacity calculation. In order to allow for flexibility in portable usage the District will use an average class size calculation of 21 for each Elementary portable and an average class size of 25 for each Middle and High School portable. The information is organized with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, middle school, and high school levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year. 22 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued Capacity Summary -All Grades CAPACITY Budget - - Pro ected - - Calendar Year 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 School Year 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 BUILDING PROGR.AU'41 HEADCOUNT CAPACITY Add Capacity 20,242 207370 20370 20,370 ... .:: 20,992 i ... 20,982 i i 20,982 d::: : Adjusted Proam Headcount Capacity 20370 20,370 20.370 20,982 20,982 20,982 20,982 i AMNT Basic Headcount Enrollment 20,144 20,063 19,943 19,823 19,695 19,704 19,823 Internet Academy Headcount Enrollment (2155) (255) (255) (255) (255) (255) (255) Basic FIE Enrollment writhout Internet Academy 19,889 1%808 19,688 19,568 19,430 19,449 19,569 ISURPLUS OR HOUSED) PROGRAM FIECAAPACIIY 481 562 1 682 1 1,414 11,552 1 1,533 1 1,414' RELOCAT BLF CAPACITY W Current Portable Capacity AddiSubtract Portable Capacity 1,685 !:;:i:`:: 1.685 1,685 i(}; ; 1,643 1.643 :.:f.-rtfl:; 1,593 1,593 is :$::::: 1,593 1,593 i�:::: 1,593 1,593 :6:'::ill 1,593 1.59; 1.593 Adjusted Portable Capacity SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGR,-"1 AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 2,166 _"Os 2,2715 3,007 3.145 3,126 NOTES: 1 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. This represents historic enrollment. 23 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY BUD DING PROOPLU •i HEAD COUNT CAPACITY CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued Capacity Summary - Elementary Schools 2023 1 2024 1 2025 1 2026 1 2027 2029 2029 2022-23 1 2023-24 1 2024-25 1 2025-26 1 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 9,016 1 9,144 1 9,144 1 9,144 1 9,756 1 9,756 1 9,756 Add/Subtract capacity total 128 0 0 612 0 0 0 . Add capacity aci att. Star Lake De Vie :: ? Ohynp is View K-8 � i i i i i i i i i i i i t AdiustedProeramHeadcount Cavacity 9.141 9,144 9,144 9,756 9,756 9,756 91756 Basic Headcount Enrollment 91051 9,015 8,961 8,907 8,845 8,853 8,907 Internet Academy Headcount (20) (20) (20) (20) (20) (20) (20) Basic Headcount Enrollment without Internet Academy 9,031 8,995 8,941 8,887 9,825 8,833 8,887 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM C.APAC1TY 113 149 1 203 1 869 1 931 923 1 869 RFLOCATARLE cAPAcrrY3 Current Portable Capacity 931 931 889 889 889 889 889 AddSubtract portable capacity 0 (42) 0 0 0 0 0 Add portable capacity aci at: Subtract portable capacity at: P P tS' Lake Grove .lfirrar Lake Stay Lake I{ cAiwod �- Olympic View ::::::::::::....... t.. .............. .:.:..:.:.:.:.:.:: .................... Adjusted Portable Capacity 931 889 889 889 889 889 889 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRIM AND RELOCAT.ABLE CAEkcrrY 1,044 1,038 1,092 I,758 1,820 1,812 1,758 NOTES: 1 Capacity increases are projected based on a design to accommodate 525 students. Increased capacity is currently stated as the difference between current calculated capacity and the projected design. In order to reduce elementary class size, Decry capacity is calculated at 17 scholars per classroom. 2 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. This represents historic enrollment. 3 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only based on class size capacity of 2l. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. 24 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY Add+Subtract capacity Add capacity at: Totem r Illahee Adiusted ProHram Headcount AT T 1T N—r CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued Capacity Summary — Middle Schools t3ua et i - - ri o t:U - - Calendar Ye 2423 2424 2025 2426 1 2027 1 2028 School Year 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-2 5,275 5,275 5-275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 5,275 5275 5275 5,275 5,275 5275 v Basic Headcount Enrollment 4,630 4,611 4,584 4,556 4,524 4,529 4,556 Internet Academy` (55) (55) (55) (55) (55) (55) (55) Basic Enrollment without Internet Academy 4,575 4,556 4,529 4,501 4,469 4,474 4,501 SURPLUS OR (UNHOt SED) PROGRAM CAPACITY 1 700 1 719 1 746 1 774 1 806 1 801 1 774 RFT.nrATART.V C APArTTV Current Portable Capacity 338 338 338 288 288 288 _'88 Add./Subtract portable capacity 0 4 50 0 0 0 0 Evergreen (formerly Totent) 1Vftddle School Sacajmnea Middle School Illahee Muddle School 5<<i Adjusted Portable Capacity 338 338 288 288 288 288 288 SURPLUS OR (UtNTHOUSED) PROGRAM ,UN'D RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 1,038 1,057 1,034 1,062 1,094 1,089 1,062 MOTES: 1 Totem and Mabee Middle Schools currently have capacity for 800 & 850 students respectively, so no new capacity is anticipated with the rebuild of these older buildings. 2 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. This represents historic enrollment. 3 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only based on class size capacity- of 25. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. 25 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY BUILDING PROGR4ht HEADCOUNT CAPACITY Add/Subtract capacity Thomas Jefferson High School Headcount WN-17rur T 1:rrx-r CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued Capacity Summary — High Schools Budget I - - Pr 'ected - - Calendar Ye 2023 1 2024 2025 2026 1 2027 1 2028 1 2029 School Year 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-2'. 5,951 5,951 5,951 5,951 5,951 5,951 5,951 a o 0 0 0 a 0 5351 5.951 5,951 5,951 5,951 .. �-9,1...5.95. 1.. , Basic Headcount Enrollment 6,463 6,437 6,399 6,360 6,310 6 322 0,360 Internet Academy' (180) (180) 1 (180) (180) (180) (180) (180) Basic Ed without Internet Academy 6,283 6,257 6,219 6,180 6,136 6,142 6,180 SURPLUS OR (U-N-HOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY (332) 1 (306) 1 (268) 1 (229) 1 (185) 1 (191) (229) RFT,nr ATART.F rAPACTT 2 Current Portable Capacity Add Subtract portable capacity r r i h r School" Thomas Jefferson 416 0 416 0 416 0 416 0 416 0 416 0 411 0 Adjusted Portable Capacity 416 1 416 416 1 416 416 416 1 416 SURPLUS OR (U HOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACTTY3 84 110 148 187 231 225 187 NOTES: I Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require M time use of school facilities. This represents historic enrollment. 2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent faclides are available. This is a calculated number only based on class size capacity of 25_ The actual number of portables that ws71 be used will be based on actual student population needs- 3 Capacity for unhoused students wall be accommodated with traveling teachers and no planning time in some classrooms. 26 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Single and Multi -Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substantially adopted by the City of Auburn, Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi -family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that district. Impact Fee Calculation When applicable, the CFP includes variables for the calculation of the Impact Fee for single family and multi -family units based on King County Code 2 1 A and the Growth Management Act. As noted above, due to declining enrollment, the CFP does not include an impact fee calculation or recommendation. Future updates to the CFP may include impact fees. Plan Year 2022 Plan Year 2023 Single Family Units $3,243 $0 Multi -Family Units $16,003 $0 Mixed -Use Residential' $8,001 $0 Impact Fee Calculation - King County Code 21 A ' In accordance with the City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249. 27 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SIX YEAR FINANCE PLAN SCHOOL ACQUISITION COST The district purchased the former Devey Technical School building to house displaced scholars during school construction then will provide permanent capacity for Early Childhood Education programs. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COST With voter approval of the $450,000,000 bond package, design work is underway for six of the approved projects. Anticipated construction budgets (based on the Guaranteed Maximum Price or GMP) have been updated to reflect the final construction contracts, plus amendments. In addition, a credit for the cost of new construction is incorporated to recognize the K-3 Class Size Reduction Grant obtained by Federal Way Public Schools. The following table outlines the facility cost included in the impact fee calculation: Elementary Lake Mirror Elementary Schools Grove Lake Star Lake Wildwood TOTAL Permanent 353 404 387 472 1616 Capacity New Capacity 600 600 525 600 2325 Increased 43.9% Capacity as % GMP $31.475,730 $33,007,391 $30,163,111 $32,609,529 $127,255,761 Proportionate $ 55,865,279 Share K-3 Class Size ($ 11,598,151) Credit Net Proportionate $ 44,267,128 Share Two additional projects are within this horizon, but not yet included — Olympic View K-8 and Mark Twain Elementary. These costs will be incorporated into future Capital Facilities Plans. Current Middle School capacity calculations do not reflect unhoused students, so no costs associated with Illahee Middle School or Evergreen Middle School are included. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Consistent with the capacity calculations described earlier, the District uses the OSPI square footage calculation for determining capacity at our secondary schools. Based on this methodology, the following construction costs for Thomas Jefferson High School are allocated as the proportionate share: Square Footage Capacity at approx. 131 s . ft. Current: 179,119 1378 Planned: 210,000 1600 Increased Capacity 237 Increase as % 16.11 % GMP $94,176,828 Proportionate Share $15,171,887 The District will use the above formulas created as a base for future Capital Facilities Plans during the life of the current bond authorization. The capacity of these schools may vary from year to year as programs are added or changed and construction cost may increase over time. FACILITIES CAPACITY Permanent Facility Capacity: Changes to the Building Program Capacities calculation are found on page 15. Capacity Summaries: The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 22-26. Student Generation Factor Analysis: Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single-family units and multi -family units. The factors used in the 2023 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single-family units and multi -family units that were constructed in the District in the last five (5) years and can be found on the next page Temporary Facility Cost: The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on pages 16 and 17. 29 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN STUDENT GENERATION RATES New Construction in Prior 5 Years Single Family Student Generatian Number of Number of Number of Number of Elementary Middle School High School Total Single Family Elementary Middle School High School Student Student Student Student DEVELOPMENT Dwellings Students Students Students factor Factor Factor Factor 19-Pacific Heights 63 11 3 3 0.0476 0.0000 0.0000 0.0476 19-Havenwood Park 71 11 3 4 0.0635 0.0159 0.0317 0.0986 18-Retreat Meadows 56 4 1 5 0.1270 0.1429 0.1746 0.5000 18-W ncresl it 41 15 0 1 0.0952 0.0000 0.0159 0.1707 18-Soundview Manor 21 0 0 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 252 41 7 13 Student Generation' i 0.1627 1 0.0278 1 0.0516 O.Z421 Nfutti-Family Student Generation- City of Federal Way Number of Number of Number of Number of Elementsry iddle School Hi h School Total Multi Family Elementary Middle School Hi h School Student Student Student Student DEVELOPMENT Dwellings Students Students Students Factor Factor Factor Factor 21-Watermark 221 114 70 46 0.5158 0.3167 0.2081 1.0407 Total 221 114 70 46 Student Generation' 0.5158 0.3167 0,2081 1.0401 ' Student Generation rate is based on totals. 30 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Item From. -,To Comment Percent of Permanent Facilities 95.86% to 96.95° m Report #3 OSPI Percent Temporary Facilities 4.24% to 3.05% Updated portable inventory Average Cost of Portable $169,579 to $128,646 Updated 5-yr rolling average of Classrooms portables purchased and placed by 2018. Construction Cost Allocation $238.22 to $246.83 Change effective July 2021 State Nfatch 65.59% to 62.95% Change effective July 2021 Average Assessed Value Per king County Assessor's Office SFR- $378,910 to $443,835 Single -fancily residences TNIFR- $193.630 to $412,362 Apartments Capital Bond Interest Rate 2.44% to 2.45% Market Rate Property Tax Levy Rate $1.84 to $1.95 king County Treasury Division Student Generation Factors Updated Housing Inventory Single-Farra„r-nly Nole: Strideni geriperarionjacyora for ow Elementary 7 1385 to .1627 single famia , units are based on noi- _ dle6•elopments constrrzered tt•rtlran Me Dasmet Middle School _0579 to .0278 os•er the last fwe (5) tears prior to the date of High School _0605 to .0516 thefee ealerdatlon_ Xfulti-FatIlily ,Sreident generation fdactors for are muln- Elementary 3946 to .5158 family units are based on Half &-velop nents conxtrucled lfatlnn 11te iniianct over the last iliiddle SChoo1 2161 to .3167 fnv (5) tsars prior to the mate of dwjee High School _2067 to .2091 Calculation Impact Fee SFR- $1, 845 to $0 SFR based on the updated calculation IMM - $15,073 to $0 MFR based on the updated calculation City of Federal Way NIFR: 4= Bedroom Unit 0° fl Discount NIFRR: 3 - Bedroom Unit 12.5% Discount hfFR: 2 Bedroom Unit 31.2% Disccount Nf R. 1-r Bedroom Unit 50% Discount NEFR. Studio Unit 62.5% Discount City of Kent, per Ordinance No 4278, rev 12i21 SFR- $1,845 to $0 SFR based on the updated calculation INIFR - $9,450 to $0 NER maximum per City of Kent Ordinance No. 4278, rev 112.1 31 Auburn School District No., 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2022 through 2028 Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors June 27, 2022 .us VRN SCHOOL DISTRICT ENGAGE • EDUCATE • EMPOWER p4%j 8 U R )V 1%t SCHOOL DISTRICT ENGAGE • EDUCATE • EMPOWER 915 Fourth Street SE Auburn, Washington 98002 (253) 931-4900 Serving Students in: City of Auburn City of Algona City of Kent City of Pacific City of Black Diamond Unincorporated King County Board of Directors Tracy Arnold Arlista Holman Sheilia McLaughlin Laura Theimer Dr. Alan Spicciati, Superintendent Capital Facilities Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I Executive Summary SECTION II Enrollment Projections and Student Generation Factors SECTION III Standard of Service SECTION IV Inventory of Facilities SECTION V Pupil Capacity SECTION VI Capital Construction Plan SECTION VII Impact Fees Page 3 Page 8 Page 18 Page 2S Page 29 Page 33 Page 3S Capital Facilities Plan SECTION I - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This six -year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Auburn School District (the "District") as the District's principal planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This Plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2022. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic long-range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period; other factors and trends in the use of facilities; and other needs of the District as may be required. However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this six -year Capital Facilities Plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and within the Cities of Auburn, Black Diamond and Kent; the King County Council, the City of Auburn, the City of Black Diamond, and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction's respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of Algona and Pacific, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act and the local ordinances, this Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. The Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the District's specific needs. Capital Facilities Plan In general, the District's current standard provides that class size for grades K-3 should not exceed 17 students and class size for grades 4-5 should not exceed 27 students. When averaged over the six elementary school grades, this computes to 20.33 students per classroom. Class size for grade 6 should not exceed 27 students and class size for grades 7 and 8 should not exceed 28.53 students. When averaged over the three middle school grades, this computes to 28.02 students per classroom. Class size for 9-12 should not exceed 28.74 students, with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers. Decisions by current legislative actions may create the need for additional classrooms. (See Section III for more specific information.) The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The District's 2021-22 capacity was 17,082. The actual number of individual students was 16,880 as of October 1, 2021. (See Section V for more specific information.) The Capital Construction Plan shown in Section VI addresses the additions and proposed modernization to the District's existing facilities. The plan includes the ongoing replacement of five elementary schools and one middle school, construction of two new elementary schools and one new middle school, and acquisition of future school sites to accommodate growth. The new facilities are required to meet the projected elementary school class size reductions mandated by the State of Washington and student population increases generated by the large development areas within the Auburn School District. Three areas that have significant impact on the school district are the Lakeland South, Lea Hill, and the north valley areas of the district. There are also other development pockets that impact the District. In the spring of 2016, the Board determined to move forward with the replacement of six schools and the construction of two new elementary schools. The project was placed before the voters in November 2016 and the bond passed at 62.83%. The first of the projects, the replacement of Olympic Middle School, started construction in May 2018 and opened in Fall 2019. The district's new elementary, Bowman Creek Elementary, started construction in May 2019 and opened in August 2020. Construction for replacement of Dick Capital Facilities Plan Scobee Elementary School started in June 2019 and the school opened in August 2020. Construction of Willow Crest Elementary School and construction of the replacement Pioneer Elementary School started May 2020 and both opened in August 2021. For the 2021-22 school year, Willow Crest Elementary served as the temporary home for Lea Hill Elementary School which started the replacement construction process in May 2021 and will open in August 2022. Construction for replacement of Chinook Elementary School started in May 2021 and will open in August 2022 as well. Construction for replacement of Terminal Park Elementary School will begin I in May 2022 and is scheduled to open in August 2023. The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn, City of Black Diamond and City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the fiscal impacts incurred by a district experiencing growth and development. Section VII sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multi -family dwelling units. The student generation factors have been developed using the students who actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and multi -family developments constructed in the last five years. The method of collecting the data is with the use of GIS mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County GIS, data from Davis Demographics and integration of the mapping with student data from the District's student data system. This method gives the District actual student generation numbers for each grade span for identified developments. Capital Facilities Plan Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2021 Capital Facilities Plan that are a part of the 2022 Plan. The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference. SECTION I Executive Summary A. Updated to reflect new information within the Plan. B. Summary level list of changes from previous year. SECTION II Enrollment Projections and Student Generation Factors A. Updated projections. See Section II & Appendices A.I. SECTION III Standard of Service A. Updated to reflect the current number of classrooms allocated to non-standard classroom uses. SECTION IV Inventory of Facilities A. Add 2 portables at Auburn High School B. Add 2 portables at Auburn Mountainview High School C. Add 2 portables at Auburn Riverside High School D. Add 1 portable at Washington Elementary School E. Remove 7 portables from Terminal Park Elementary School Section V Pupil Capacity A. The 7 portables to be relocated in July 2022 are needed to accommodate enrollment increases. Capital Facilities Plan Impact Fees CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2027 TO 2022 DATA ELEMENTS CFP 2021 CFP 2022 EXPLANATION Student Generation Consistent with King County Ordinance Factors 11621, Student Generation Factors are Single Family calculated by the school district based on Elementary 0.2500 0.3010 district records of average actual student Middle School 0.1310 0.1460 generation rates for new developments High School 0.1520 0.1550 constructed over the last five years. Multi -Family Elementary 0.4330 0.3920 Middle School 0.1850 0.1350 High School 0.1750 0.1530 School Construction Costs Middle School $112,000,000 $134,320,000 From new school construction cost estimates in April 2022. Site Acquisition Costs Updated estimate based on 10% annual Cost per Acre $444,771 $489,248 inflation. Area Cost Allowance Updated to current OSPI schedule. (May Boeckh Index $238.22 $246.83 2022) Updated to current OSPI schedule (May Match % - State 62.87% 63.83% 2022) Match % - District 37.13% 36.17% Computed District Average AV Single Family $402,640 $458,409 Updated from March 2022 King County Dept. of Assessments data. Multi -Family $197,141 $223,737 Updated from March 2022 King County Dept. of Assessments data using average V for apartments and condominiums. Debt Sery Tax Rate $2.21 $2.13 Current Fiscal Year GO Bond Int Rate 2.44% 2.45% Current Rate (Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-14) Capital Facilities Plan SECTION II - ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS AND STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Student Enrollment Projections Projection techniques give consideration to historical and current data as a basis for forecasting the future. In addition, certain assumptions must be made about the variables in the data being used. Forecasting can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future or from the known to the unknown. The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, psychological, economic, and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection. An example of this is with the COVID-19 pandemic. The logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today and will be in the future. It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over time. The basis of enrollment projections in the Auburn School District has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group of students in a grade level as it progresses through time. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. If all students in one grade level progress to the next, the cohort number would be 1.00. If fewer students from the group progress the number will be less than 1. The district has used this method with varying years of history (3 years, 6 years,10 years and 13 years) as well as weighted factors to study several projections. The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact. This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections. Monitoring deviation is critical to the viability and creditably of the projections derived by these techniques. Capital Facilities Plan Overview of 2022-23 Enrollment Projections Table 1 shows historical enrollment for the October 1 count in the Auburn School District over the past 20 years. The data shows overall average growth over the recent 10 years is 1.59%. It is important to note this average includes a 4.22% decrease in October 2020 enrollment due to the COVID pandemic. TABLE 1 Historical Enrollment: October 1 Actuals, K-12 (No RS/OD/GA) Source: OSPI 1251H GRADE 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 KDG 905 921 892 95S 940 995 998 1032 1010 1029 1098 1170 1232 1198 1237 1261 1271 1291 1038 1227 1 900 982 960 963 1012 995 1014 1033 1066 1068 1089 1188 1219 1279 1210 1276 1290 1314 1236 1185 2 961 909 992 963 1001 1019 1024 998 1016 1097 1083 1124 1196 1289 1300 1251 1311 1295 1243 1249 3 940 996 918 1002 1031 997 1048 993 1013 996 1111 1125 1136 1232 1317 1328 1275 1320 1243 1264 4 973 947 1016 939 1049 1057 1045 1073 1024 1022 1038 1123 1156 1170 1237 1328 1378 1316 1257 1255 5 1062 1018 956 1065 998 1077 1070 1030 1079 1017 1070 1075 1122 1172 1199 1269 1345 1361 1294 1251 6 1104 1111 1020 1004 1061 1008 1096 1040 1041 1063 1041 1076 1059 1116 1152 1207 1275 1337 1306 1233 7 1021 1131 1124 1028 1014 1057 1034 1125 1060 1032 1086 1072 1091 1099 1132 1194 1232 129S 1319 1304 8 1026 1052 1130 1137 1069 1033 1076 1031 1112 1046 1018 1116 1088 1136 1108 1183 1213 1236 1264 1312 8 1432 1464 1459 1379 1372 1337 1257 1245 1221 1273 1200 1159 1275 1229 1261 1257 1372 1399 1351 1386 10 1233 1246 1260 1383 1400 1367 1341 1277 1238 1168 1278 1229 1169 1316 1248 1300 1313 1410 1376 1388 11 902 991 1019 1153 1294 1305 1304 1269 1212 1177 1116 1187 1169 1111 1248 1188 1198 1218 1174 1299 12 888 841 833 989 1068 1176 1259 1319 1251 1220 1231 1186 1218 1175 1104 1266 1126 1113 1090 1248 TOTALS 13,347 13,609 13,579 13,960 14,309 14,423 14,566 14,465 14,343 14,208 14,459 14,830 15,130 15,522 15,753 16,308 16,599 16,905 16,191 16,601 Student Gain/Loss 30 381 349 114 143 101 122 135 251 371 300 392 231 555 291 306 714 412 Average Student Gain/Loss for 10 years 240 Average Percent Gain/Loss for Recent 10 years 1.59% Capital Facilities Plan While still in the pandemic, it was important to consider the impact the pandemic will have on future projections. Using the Cohort Survival method, the decrease in enrollment of 4.22% in October 2020 will skew enrollment projections for 2021 and beyond. Some of the assumptions made in calculating projections for the 2022-23 school year are: 1. Kindergarten enrollment will continue to beat pre -pandemic levels. a. ASD Kindergarten enrollment is almost 5% of births in King County. However, in 2017, King County live births were at the lowest number since 2005 at 25,487 which would project an October 2022 kindergarten class of approximately 1,215 students. 2. The number of students generated from housing growth in the district will slow. a. Currently there are no large multi -family housing active within the district boundaries. b. Although there is a long list of single-family developments, only 22 are scheduled to be occupied in the near future. Calculations were made to create cohort scenarios based upon the following survival ratios: 3-year average, 3-year weighted average, 6-year average, 6-year median, and the 10-year average. Two of the scenarios (3-year weighted average and 3-year average) were not considered because of the impact October 2020 had on the calculation. The decision was made to use the 6-year average scenario which is found in Table 2 below. Although the Auburn School District tracks single- and multi -family housing developments, the District currently does not have estimated dates of completion and occupancy. Therefore, the projections shown below do not include the student generation numbers calculated in the next section. Capital Facilities Plan 10-Year Average Projection Actual Births Projected Births 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 25,274 24,337 24,090 24,567 24,567 24,567 24,448 24,537 24,530 24,520 4.79% 4.79% 4.79°A 4.79,% 4.79% 4.79% 4.79% 4.79% 4.79% 4.79% GRADE 22-23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-.30 30-31 31-32 KDG 1,211 1,166 1,154 1,177 1,176.93 1,177 1,171.12 1,175.40 1,175.05 1,174.60 1 1,278 1,261 1,215 1,202 1,225.99 1,226 1,225.99 1,220.04 1,224.50 1,224.13 2 1,203 1,297 1,280 1,233 1,220.03 1.244 1,24419 1,244.19 1,238.15 1,242.68 3 1,266 1,219 1,315 1,298 1,249.59 1,237 1,261.40 1,261.40 1,261.40 1,255.28 4 1,234 1,286 1,238 1,336 1,317.77 1,269 1,256.03 1,280.90 1, 280.90 1,280.90 5 1,271 1,300 1,302 1,254 1,352.23 1,334 1,284.90 1,271.76 1,296.94 1,296.94 6 1,240 1,259 1,288 1,290 1, 242.27 1,340 1,322.23 1,273.21 1,260.29 1,285.24 7 1,255 1,261 1,281 1,310 1,312.84 1,264 1,363.53 1,345.41 1,295.53 1,282.39 8 1,319 1,269 1,276 1,296 1,325.33 1,328 1,,278.39 1,378.99 1,360.67 1,310.22 9 1,493 1,491 1,434 1,442 1,464.96 1,498 1,500.99 1,445.21 1.558.94 1,538.23 10 1,414 1,513 1,520 1,463 1,470.96 1,494 1,529.02 1,530.78 1,473.99 1,589.89 11 1,292 1,316 1,409 1,416 1,362.24 1,370 1,391.24 1,422.39 1,425.45 1,372.49 12 1,297 1,290 1,314 1,406 1,413. 30 1,360 1,367.19 1,399.73 1,420. 31 1,422.99 TOTALS 16,911 16,929 17,026 17,122 17,134 17,141 17,195 17,239 17,272 17,276 210 117 99 96 12 6 54 44 33 4 1.27% 0.70r% 0.581% 0.56% 0.07`'% 0.04% 0.32% 0.25% 0.19'% 0.02% TOTALS BY LEVEL K-5 7,512 7,529 7,504 7,498 7,542 7,487 7,444 7,454 7,477 7,475 648 3,813 3,790 3,845 3,897 3,880 3,932 3,964 3,998 3,916 3,878 9-12 5,496 5,610 5,677 5,727 5,711 5,722 5,787 5,788 5,979 5,923 LTRS 304 311 315 317 316 317 321 321 326 329 GRAND TOTAL 17,115 17,239 17,341 17,439 17,451 17,458 17,516 17,560 17,598 17,604 0.73% 0.59% 0.571% 0.075fi 0.04% 0.33% 0.25% 0.22% 0.04'% Student Generation Factors Planned residential development data is collected to determine the number of new residential units that may be built in the near future. The projected units will have the appropriate Student Generation Factor applied to determine the number of new students that planned residential development might yield. This data was obtained through discussions with the major developers within the District boundaries, the City of Algona, Auburn, Kent, Pacific, King County, and District officials. The student population by residence includes all Capital Facilities Plan approved and tentative tract maps in addition to any planned or proposed development that possibly will occur within the project timeframe. The planned residential development information and phasing estimates are a snapshot of the District as of this time. The information may change and is updated annually. Closely related to the planned residential development units are Student Generation Factors. When applied to planned residential development units, the Student Generation Factors determine how many additional students will be generated from new construction within the District. Two sets of data are used to calculate Student Generation Factors: current student enrollment and current housing data. This information associates each student with a housing unit. Two general housing categories are analyzed: Single Family and Multi -Family. Data showing the number of students generated from previous single- and multi -family developments generates the Student Generation Factor to be applied to future developments. The tables on the next two pages show the information for both single -and multi -family developments. The components include: • "Development Name" is a list of developments in various stages of occupancy. • "Year of Full Occupancy" is important because fully -occupied developments stay on the list for five years contributing to the Student Generation Factor. Once the five years is up, the development is removed from the list. • Also included for each development listed is the number of units, the amount of current units occupancy and the remaining units to be occupied. • "Feeder Pattern" shows the elementary school associated with each development. • "Actual Students" is the data of actual students generated from the units already occupied. • "Student Generation Factors" is the calculation of actual students divided by the number of occupied units. • "Single Family--2022 and beyond" lists the developments that are in process, but have not yet sta rted to occu py u n its. Capital Facilities Plan • The units for these developments are multiplied by the Student Generation Factor for each to determine the "Estimated Students Based on Student Generation Factors" The table at the bottom of the page shows an estimated timeline of when the unoccupied units are scheduled to be occupied. Table 3 shows the single- and multiple -family units to be occupied, the estimated number of students generated and a timeline by year of when those students would potentially be enrolled. The bottom table reflects a cumulative number over a period of 7 school years. SINGLE DEVELOPMENT MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENT Table 3 BUILDOUT SCHEDULE Auburn School District Development Growth Including the Previous 5 Years May 2022 (Based on Current Year Enrollment) SINGLE FAMILY Development Name Year of Full Occupancy Units/ Parcels Current Occupancy To Be Occupied Alicia Glenn 2016 28 28 0 Anthem former) Me an's Meadows 2018 13 13 0 Bridges 2021 380 380 0 Canyon Creek 2018 151 151 0 Dulcinea 2018 6 6 0 Hastings 2020 10 10 0 Hazel View 2018 22 22 0 Forest Glen at Lakland 2021 30 30 0 Lakeland Hills Estates 2017 66 66 0 Lakeland: Pinnacle Estates 2018 99 99 0 Lozier Ranch 18 7 11 Monterey Park 2016 238 238 0 Mountain View 2018 55 55 0 Omnia Palisades Plate 16 14 2 River Rock 14 5 9 Seremounte 2019 30 30 0 Sonata Hills 2017 69 69 0 Spencer Place 2017 13 13 0 Vasiliy 2021 8 8 0 Willow Place 2021 11 11 0 Totals 1277 1255 22 Actual Students Elem I Middle I HS Total 11 11 8 30 7 4 0 11 105 43 48 196 32 16 15 63 1 2 1 4 51 01 0 5 101 21 17 81 51 3 16 20 19 11 50 49 22 21 92 1 0 0 1 60 23 271 110 9 3 8 20 3 1 4 8 4 0 0 4 23 11 17 51 21 8 17 46 7 10 7 24 0 3 0 3 2 0 3 5 378 183 195 756 Student Generation Factors Elem Middle HS Total 0.393 0.393 0.286 1.071 0.538 0.308 0.000 0.846 0.276 0.113 0.126 0.516 0.212 0.106 0.099 0.417 0.167 0.333 0.1671 0.667 0.500 0.000 0.0001 0.500 0.455 0.091 0.2271 0.773 0.267 0.167 0.100 0.533 0.303 0.288 0.167 0.758 0.495 0.222 0.212 0.929 0.143 0.000 0.000 0.143 0.252 0.0971 0.113 0.462 0.164 0.055 0.145 0.364 0.214 0.071 0.571 0.800 0.000 _0186t 0.0001 0.800 0.767 0.367 0.5671 1.700 0.304 0.116 0.246 0.667 0.538 0.769 0.538 1.846 0.000 0.375 0.000 0.375 0.182 0.000 0.2731 0.455 0.3011 0.146 0.1551 0.602 Auburn School District Development Growth Including the Previous 5 Years May 2022 (Based on Current Year Enrollment) SINGLE FAMILY-- 2022 and beyond Development Name Units/ Parcels Current Occupancy To Be Occupied Ashton Park 20-Lot Prelim Plat 20 0 20 Carbon Trails 44 0 44 Greenvale* 17 0 17 Knudson 17-Lot Prelim Plat 17 0 17 River Glen 12-Lot Plat 12 0 12 Robbins Prelim Plat 31-Lot SFR Lots 31 0 31 Summit at Kendall Ridge Plat 17 0 17 The Alicias 56-Lot Plat 56 0 56 Current Partially Occupied Developments 1277 1255 22 1491 236 Totals * currently under construction Estimated Students Based on Student Generation Factors Elem Middle HS Total 6 3 3 12 13 6 7 27 5 2 3 10 5 2 3 10 4 2 2 7 9 5 5 19 5 1 21 31 10 17 8 9 34 7 3 3 13 71 1 341 37 142 Auburn School District Development Growth Including the Previous 5 Years May 2022 (Based on Current Year Enrollment) MULTI FAMILY Development Name Year of Full Occupancy Units/ Parcels Current Occupancy To Be Occupied Feeder Elementary Actual Students Student Generation Factors Elem Middle HS I Total Elam Middle HS Total Promenade A is 2018 294 294 0 Lea Hill 172 86 98 356 0.585 0.293 0.333 1.211 The Villas at Auburn 2018 295 295 0 Washington 53 10 21 84 0.180 0.034 0.071 0.285 Copper Gate Apartments 2021 500 500 0 Evergreen Hts. 288 79 81 448 0.576 0.158 0.162 0.896 The Verge Auburn 2022 226 226 0 Terminal Park 3 2 1 6 0.013 0.009 0.004 0.027 Totals 1315 1315 0 516 177 201 894 0.392 0.136 0.153 0.680 ,)ngq nnri h. —i Units) Parcels Current I Occupancy To Be Occupied Lexi1 190 0 190 Current Partially Occupied Developments 13151 1315 0 1505 190 Estimated Students Based on Student Generation Factors 75 26 29 129 01 01 01 0 751 261 291 129 BASE DATA - BUILDOUT SCHEDULE ASSUMPTIONS: 1. Build out estimates are received from developers. 2. Some development data received from Davis Demographics. 3. Dates of potential occupancy are unavailable so student projections by year could not be calculated. TABLE 3: Units to be Occupied Single Family Units 236 Projected Students Elementary (K-S) 71 Middle (6-8) 34 High (9-12) 37 Total K-12 142 Multi -Family Units 190 Projected Students Elementary (K-S) 74 Middle (6-8) 26 High (9-12) 29 Total K-12 129 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS 2022 Single Family Multi -Family Elementary 0.301 0.392 Middle 0.146 0.135 High 0.155 0.153 Total 0.602 0.680 Capital Facilities Plan SECTION III - STANDARD OF SERVICE The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn, City of Black Diamond and the City of Kent indicate that each school district must establish a "Standard of Service" in order to ascertain the overall capacity to house its projected student population. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage "capacity" guidelines for computing state funding support. The fundamental purpose of the OSPI guidelines is to provide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching funds for school construction projects. By default these guidelines have been used to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population. The OSPI guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, facility configurations, emerging educational reform, or the dynamics of each student's educational program. The Auburn School District Standard of Service addresses those local considerations that require space in excess of the OSPI guidelines. The effect on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation pattern. Conditions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without accompanying computations. OVERVIEW As reflected in enrollment numbers for the 2021-22 school year, the Auburn School District operates 15 elementary schools housing 7,431 students in grades K through S. The four middle schools house 3,849 students in grades 6 through 8. The District operates three comprehensive senior high schools and one alternate high school, housing 5,595 students in grades 9 through 12. (Source: October 1, 2021 Enrollment) CLASS SIZE The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the student population. Specialists create additional space Capital Facilities Plan needs. Class sizes are subject to collective bargaining agreements. Changes to class size agreements can have significant impact on available space. The current pupil/teacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 20.33 students per teacher. Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 20.33 students per room at grades K - S. At grades 6 - 8 the limit is set at 28.02 students per room. At grades 9 - 12 the limit is set at 28.74 students per room. The OSPI space allocation for each grade articulation level, less the computed reduction for the Auburn School District Standard of Service, determines the District's capacity to house projected pupil populations. These reductions are shown in the following documents by grade articulation level. ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STANDARD OF SERVICE MIDDLE SCHOOL STANDARD OF SERVICE HIGH SCHOOL STANDARD OF SERVICE STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate to severe disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses 15 classrooms to provide for 135 students. The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. No loss of capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to total elementary population. PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates an adaptive behavior program for students with behavior disabilities at the elementary school level. The program uses three classrooms to provide for 24 students. The housing requirements for this program exceed the OSPI space allocations. (Three classrooms @ 20.33 - 8 = 12.33) Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 12.33 each = (37) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 12.33 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (37) SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities. Twenty standard classrooms are required to house this program. The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the OSPI space guidelines at Lakeland Hills, Dick Scobee, and Bowman Creek Elementary Schools. Continued loss of capacity is expected as growth in program is larger than the total elementary population. Loss of Permanent Capacity 17 (20-3) rooms @ 20.33 each = (346) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (346) STUDENT TEACHER ENRICHMENT PROGRAM (STEP) The Auburn School District operates an elementary program for highly capable and high achieving students at Grade 4 and Grade 5. This program is housed in three classrooms at Terminal Park Elementary School. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 20.33 each = (61) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @20.33 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (61) EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a pre-school program for young children below age five with disabilities. This program is housed at eleven different elementary schools and currently uses 13 standard classrooms. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 13 rooms @ 20.33 each = (264) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (264) READING LABS The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional language arts instruction. These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces if available in each elementary school. Five elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available, thus they are housed in a standard classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 20.33 each = (102) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (102) MUSIC ROOMS The Auburn School District elementary music programs require one acoustically -modified classroom at each school for music instruction. The housing requirements are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @ 20.33 each = (305) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (305) ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates pullout programs at the elementary school level for students learning English as a second language. This program requires 30 standard classrooms that are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 30 rooms @ 20.33 each = (610) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (610) SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for eight highly -impacted elementary schools. This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade level and do not receive other services. This program requires eight standard classrooms that are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 20.33 each = Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = Total Capacity Loss = ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a learning specialist program to increase literacy skills for first and second graders. This program model was originally created from the 1-728 funds and currently has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms, as well as pulling out students into designated classrooms. The district is utilizing classrooms at all fifteen elementary schools. Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @ 20.33 each = Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = Total Capacity Loss = EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates an ECEAP program for 236 pre-school aged children in twelve sections of half -day length and one full -day program. The program is housed at seven elementary schools and utilizes seven standard elementary classrooms and one additional classroom space and seven auxiliary office spaces. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 20.33 each = Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = Total Capacity Loss = (163) 0 (163) (305) 0 (305) (142) 0 (142) MIDDLE SCHOOLS SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level. This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific disabilities. Eleven classrooms are required at the middle school level to provide for approximately 330 students. The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior disabilities. The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses two classrooms. One of the two classrooms for this program are provided for in the OSPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 rooms @ 28.02 each = (28) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (28) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates seven structured learning classrooms at the middle school level for students with moderate to severe disabilities. Two of the seven classrooms for this program are provided for in the OSPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 28.02 each = (140) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (140) ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for English Language Learner students. This program requires eleven standard classrooms that are not provide for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 11 rooms @ 28.02 each = (308) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (308) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. OSPI Report #3 dated 12/14/11 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the mid -level facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 28.02 each = (224) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (224) HIGH SCHOOLS NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the high school level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 28.74 each = (29) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (29) ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at three comprehensive high schools for English Language Learner students. This program requires fourteen standard classrooms that are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 28.74 each = (402) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (402) PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior diabilities. The program is housed at one of the high schools and uses two classrooms. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 28.74 each = (57) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (57) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates twelve structured learning center classrooms for students with moderate to severe disabilities. This program is housed at three high schools requiring standard classrooms that are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 12 rooms @ 28.74 each = (345) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (345) SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities. The current high school program requires 15 classrooms to provide program to meet educational needs of the students. The OSPI space guidelines provide for one of the 15 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 28.74 each = (402) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (402) PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center. The OSPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity. This space was not intended for, nor is it usable for, classroom instruction. It was constructed to provide a community center for the performing arts. Using OSPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet computes to 208 unhoused students or 7.25 classrooms. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7.25 rooms @ 28.74 each = (208) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. There are 185 teaching stations available in the senior high facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 10 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 28.74 each = (287) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (287) STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS ELEMENTARY Loss of Permanent Capacity (2,334) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (2,334) MIDDLE SCHOOL Loss of Permanent Capacity (701) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (701) SENIOR HIGH Loss of Permanent Capacity (1,732) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,732) TOTAL Loss of Permanent Capacity (4,766) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (4,766) Capital Facilities Plan SECTION IV - INVENTORY OF FACILITIES Table IVA shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OSPI rated capacities. Table IV.2 shows the number and location of each portable by school. The district uses relocatable facilities to: 1. provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting, 2. make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique students needs, and 3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on existing physical plants. Core facilities (i.e. gymnasiums, restrooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc.) are not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable classrooms. TABLE IV.1 PERMANENT DISTRICT SCHOOL FACILITIES TABLE IV.2 PORTABLE FACILITIES INVENTORY DISTRICT SCHOOL FACILITIES MAP Capital Facilities Plan Table Permanent Facilities District School Facilities IV,1 @ OSPI Rated Capacity (March 2022) Building Capacity Acres Address Elementa Schools AI ac Elementary 505 10.68 310 Milwaukee Boulevard North, Pacific WA, 98047 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 614 10.02 29205 132"d Street SE, Auburn WA, 98092 Bowman Creek Elementary 812 22.03 5701 Kersey Way SE, Auburn, WA 98092 Chinook Elementary 461 13.09 3502 Auburn Way South, Auburn WA, 98092 Dick Scobee Elementary 819 9.13 1031 14th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Evergreen Heights Elem. 463 10.10 5602 South 316th, Auburn WA, 98001 Gildo Rey Elementary 566 10.05 1005 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Hazelwood Elementary 594 13.08 11815 Southeast 304th Street, Auburn WA, 98092 Ilalko Elementary 592 14.23 301 Oravetz Place Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Lake View Elementary 581 16.44 16401 Southeast 318th Street, Auburn WA, 98092 Lakeland Hills Elementary 594 12.00 1020 Evergreen Way SE, Auburn WA, 98092 Lea Hill Elementary 450 20.24 30908 124th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Pioneer Elementary 837 11.13 2301 M Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Terminal Park Elementary 415 6.09 1101 D Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Washington Elementary 494 5.33 20 E Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 ELEMENTARY CAPACITY 8,797 Middle Schools Cascade Middle School 837 16.94 1015 24th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Mt. Baker Middle School 837 30.00 620 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Olympic Middle School 974 17.45 839 215' Street SE, Auburn WA, 98002 Rainier Middle School 843 25.54 30620 116th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3,491 Senior High Schools Auburn HS 2,127 23.74 711 East Main Street, Auburn WA, 98002 Auburn Mountainview HS 1,443 39.42 28900 124'h Ave SE, Auburn WA, 98092 Auburn Riverside HS 1,387 35.32 501 Oravetz Road, Auburn WA, 98092 West Auburn HS 233 5.26 401 West Main Street, Auburn WA, 98001 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5,190 TOTAL CAPACITY 17,478 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES TABLE TEMPORARY/RELOCATABLE IV.2 FACILITIES INVENTORY June 2022 Elementary Location 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 2028-2029 Alpac 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Arthur Jacobsen 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Bowman Creek 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Chinook 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dick Scobee 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evergreen Heights 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Gildo Rey 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Hazelwood 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Ilalko 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Lake View 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Lakeland Hills 7 5 5 5 5 5 5 Lea Hill 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pioneer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Terminal Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Washington 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Willow Crest 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 45 43 43 43 43 43 43 TOTAL CAPACITY 915 874 874 874 874 874 874 Middle School Location 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 2028-2029 Cascade 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Mt. Baker 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Olympic 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Rainier 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 11 1 11 TOTAL UNITS 35 35 1 35 35 1 35 35 35 TOTAL CAPACITY 981 981 981 981 981 981 9817 Sr. High School Location 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 2028-2029 Auburn High School 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Auburn High School - `TAP 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Auburn Mountainview 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Auburn Riverside 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 West Auburn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 TOTAL CAPACITY 862 862 862 862 862 862 862 "TAP - Transition Assistance Program for 18-21 year old students with special needs. COMBINED TOTAL UNITS 110 108 108 108 108 108 108 COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY 2,758 2,717 2,717 2,717 2,717 2,717 2,717 Auburn Mountainview HS Arthur Jacobsen ES e ° 'L., Hazelwood ES n Willoi "Crest -ES (.Cascade MS ,, 4 3� Rainier MS s • 9!' Ever ee e�ah ick Scobee ES Lea Hill ES c r r Lake View ES •�,i Administration Build!Ad urn His a hington ES �► ark ES . Y ildo Rey E Baker M$ , Ap _ i'Auburn Riverside H5 lialko ES , ilift-. ;.Bowman Creek ES t Lakeland Hills ES •, SY r; ` r A.�'•' . o ° �Ikt of vC x 7 f;15& CMG 7G t ��,UM& UM,c—QM a 0 �49eco h ma Capital Facilities Plan SECTION V - PUPIL CAPACITY While the Auburn School District uses the OSPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from which to determine space needs, the District's educational program requires more space than that provided for under the formula. This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in Section III, Standard of Service. The District's capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional space to house its programs. Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new funded facilities. The combined effect of these adjustments is shown on Line B in Tables V.1 and V.2. Table V.l shows the District's capacity with relocatable units included and Table V.2 without these units. TABLE V.1 CAPACITY WITH RELOCATABLES TABLE V.2 CAPACITY WITHOUT RELOCATABLES PERMANENT FACILITIES (a) SPI RATED CAPACITY 2/ Table V.1 Capacity 21-22 22-23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 WITH relocatables A. SPI Capacity 17,478 17,478 18,517 18,752 18,752 18,752 18,752 19,552 A.1 SPI Capacity -New Elem 650 A.2 SPI Capacity -Replacements 389 235 A.3 SPI Capacity -New MS 800 B. Capacity Adjustments 2,059 2,008 2,042 2,042 2,042 2,042 2,042 2,042 15,419 16,509 16,710 16,710 16,710 16,710. 17,510. 17,510. C. Net Capacity D. ASD Enrollment 16,880 17,115 17,239 17,341 17,439 17,451 17,458 17,516 E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (1,461) (606) (529) (631) (729) (741) 52 (6) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Include Relocatable 2,707 2,758 2,724 2,724 2,724 2,724 2,724 2,724 Exclude SOS 17 4,766 4,766 4,766 4,766 4,766 4,766 4,766 4,766 Total Adjustments (2,059) (2,008) (2,042) (2,042) (2,042) (2,042) (2,042) (2,042) Table V.2 Capacity 21-22 22-23 23-24 1 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 WITHOUT relocatables A. SPI Capacity 17,478 17,478 18,517 18,752 18,752 18,752 18,752 19,552 A.1 SPI Capacity -New Elem 650 A.2 SPI Capacity -Replacements 389 235 A.3 SPI Capacity -New MS 800 B. Capacity Adjustments 4,766 4,766 4,766 4,766 4,766 4,766 4,766 4,766 C. Net Capacity 12,712 13,751 13,986 13,986 13,986 13,986 14,786 14,786 D. ASD Enrollment 16,880 17,115 17,239 17,341 17,439 17,451 17,458 17,516 E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (4,168) (3,364) (3,253) (3,355) (3,453) (3,465) (2,672) (2,730) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Exclude SOS 17 4,766 4,766 4,766 4,756 4,766 4,766 4,766 4,766 Total Adjustments (4,766) (4,766) (4,766) (4,766) (4,766) (4,766) (4,766) (4,766) New facilities shown in 2019-20 through 2023-24 are funded by the 2016 School Bond Issue. The Standard of Service represents 27.26% of OSPI capacity. When new facilities are added the Standard of Service computations are decreased to 25.42 % of SPI capacity. Students beyond the capacity are accommodated in other spaces (commons, library, theater, shared teaching space). PERMANENT FACILITIES SPI Rated Capacity March 2022 ` `a, Building 21-22 22-23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 Washingtoi 494 494 494 494 494 494 494 494 Terminal Park 415 415 650 650 650 650 650 650 Dick Scobee 819 819 819 819 819 819 819 819 Pioneer 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 Chinook 461 650 650 650 650 650 650 650 Lea Hill 450 650 650 650 650 650 650 650 Gildo Rey 566 566 566 566 566 566 566 566 Evergreen Heights 463 463 463 463 463 463 463 463 Alpac 505 505 505 505 505 505 505 505 Lake View 581 581 581 581 581 581 581 581 Hazelwood 594 594 594 594 594 594 594 594 Ilalko 592 592 592 592 592 592 592 592 Lakeland Hills 594 594 594 594 594 594 594 594 Arthur Jacobsen 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 Bowman Creek 812 812 812 812 812 812 812 812 Willow Crest - 650 650 650 650 650 650 650 ELEMENTARY CAPACITY 8797 9,836 10,071 10071 10,071 10071 10,071 10071 Building 21-22 22-23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 Cascade 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 Olympic 974 974 974 974 974 974 974 974 Rainier 843 843 843 843 843 843 843 843 Mt. Baker 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 Middle School #5 -- -- - - - - 800 800 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3491 3,491 3,491 3,491 3,491 3,491 4291 4,291 JBuilding" ' 21-22 22-23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 West Auburn 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 Auburn 2,127 2,127 2,127 2,127 2,127 2,127 2,127 2,127 Auburn Riverside 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 Auburn Mountainview 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5,190 5,190 5,190 5,190 5,190 5190 5,190 5,190 COMBINED CAPACITY 17,478 18,517 18,752 18752 18752 18,7521 19,552 19,552 Capital Facilities Plan SECTION VI - CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN The formal process used by the Auburn School Board to address current and future facility needs began almost 50 years ago in 1974. The process includes a formation of a community -wide citizen's committee and throughout the years, these Ad Hoc Committees have conducted work and made recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and facilities. In October of 2008, after two years of review and study, a Steering Committee made recommendations to the Board regarding the capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities as recommended by the 2004-05 Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee. These recommendations, based on specific criteria, led to the Board placing a school improvement bond and capital improvements levy on the ballot in March 2009. Voters did not approve either measure that would have updated 24 facilities and replaced three aging schools. The Board decided to place only a six -year Capital Levy on the ballot in November of 2009, which passed at S5.17%. The levy funded $46.4 million of needed improvement projects at 24 sites over the following seven school years. Planning for the replacement of aging schools was started with educational specifications and schematic design process for the replacement of Auburn High School. The District acquired a site for a future high school in 2008 and a second site for a future middle school in 2009. The District also continued efforts to acquire property around Auburn High School. The Special Education Transitional Assistance Program (TAP) opened in February of 2010. This facility is designed for students with disabilities that are 18 to 21 years old. In the November 2012 election, the community supported the $110 million bond issue for the Auburn High School Modernization and Reconstruction Project at 62%. Construction began in February 2013. The entire new building was occupied by Auburn High School students and staff in the fall of 2015, with site improvements being completed during the 201S-16 school year. In January 2015, a citizen's ad hoc committee was convened by direction of the Board to address growth and facilities. The major recommendations were to construct two new elementary schools in the next four years and to acquire 3 new elementary school sites as soon as possible. 1/ 1/ 2/ 1/ Capital Facilities Plan In the November 2016 election, the community supported the $4S6 million bond issue for the replacement of six schools and the construction of two new elementary schools at 62.83%. Construction for the replacement of Olympic Middle School began in May 2018 and was completed in Fall 2019. Construction for Bowman Creek Elementary School began in May 2019 and was completed in Fall 2020. Construction for the replacement of Dick Scobee Elementary School began in June 2019 and was completed in Fall 2020. Construction for Willow Crest Elementary School and replacement of Pioneer Elementary School began in May 2020 and was completed in Fall 2021. Construction for replacement of Chinook and Lea HIII Elementary Schools began in June 2021 and will be completed in Fall of 2022. Construction for replacement of Terminal Park Elementary School will begin in June 2022 and will be completed in Fall of 2023. We anticipate running a Capital Bond Measure in 2026. Funds will be used to construct a new middle school on property currently owned by the District, and may include funds to replace one or more existing schools. The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years. The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population. 2022-28 Capital Construction Plan (May 2022 Projected Fund Project Timelines Project Funded Cost Source 21-22 22-23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 2020 Technology Yes $35,000,000 6 Year XX Xx XX XX XX XX Modernization Cap. Levy Portable Relocation Yes $1,400,000 Impact Fees xx xx Bond Property Purchase Yes $7,500,000 Impact xx - 1 New Elementary Fee Bond XX XX XX XX XX Middle School #5 Yes $112,000,000 Impact plan plan const const open Fee Replacement of XX xx xx five Elementary Yes $242,500,000 Bond const const open Schools 1/ 1 nese tunas may oe securea rnrougn a cornouiauuii ui uie cv 10 oviiu iaauo, Nlul-'Y, „Nu state matching funds. 2/ These funds may be secured through a combination of a bond issue, impact fees, and state matching funds. Capital Facilities Plan SECTION VII - IMPACT FEES IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION (SPRING 2022) TABLES I - IV TABLES V - VI IMPACT FEE ELEMENTS IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION (Spring 2022) I. SITE COST PER RESIDENCE Formula: ((Acres x Cost erAcre)/Facilit Size) x Student Factor Site Cost/ Facility Student Generation Factor Cost/ Cost/ A rr- arra r:anarity Single Familv Multi Familv Single Family Multi Family Elem Sch (K - 5) 15 $489,248 650 0.3010 0.3920 $3,398.39 $4,425.81 Middle Sch (6 - 8) 25 $0 800 0.1460 0.1350 $0.00 $0.00 Sr High 9 - 12 40 $0 1500 0,1550 0.1530 $0.00 $0.00 1 $3,398.39 1 $4,425.81 1 II. PERMANENT FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCE Formula: ((Facilit Cost/Facility Size x Student Factor x Permanent to Total Square Footage Percentage) Facility Facility %Perm Sq Ft/ Student Generation Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total Sn Ft Sinole Familv Multi Familv I Sinole Familv I Multi Familv Elem (K - 5) $0 650 0.9485 0.3010 0.3920 $0.00 $0.00 Mid Sch (6 - 8) $134,320,000 800 0.9485 0,1460 0.1350 $23,251.96 $21,500.10 Sr Hi h 9 - 12 $0 1500 0.9485 0.1550 0.1530 $0.00 $0.00 1 $23,251.96 1 $21,500.10 1 III. TEMPORARY FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCE Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Size) x Student Factor) x (Temporary to Total Square Footage Ratio Facility Facility % Temp Sq Ft/ Student Generation Factor Cost/ Cost/ Q;--1- �.,.,,��„ r-+ si>A Total Rn Ft Sinnla Familv Multi Familv Sinole Familv I Multi Familv Elem (K' 5) $250,000 20.33 0.0515 0,3010 0.3920 $190.47 $248.06 Mid Sch (6 - 8) $250,000 28.02 0.0515 0.1460 0.1350 $67.03 $61.98 Sr High 9 - 12 $250,000 28.74 0.0515 0,1550 0.1530 $69.38 $68.49 1 $326.88 1 $378.53 1 IV. STATE MATCH CREDIT PER RESIDENCE Formula: (Boeckh Index x SPI Footage x District Match x Student Factor Boeckh SPI State Student Generation Factor Cost/ Cost/ Index Footage Match Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Family Elem (K - 5) $0.00 90 63.83% 0.3010 0.3920 $0.00 $0.00 Mid Sch (6 - 8) $246.83 108 63.83% 0.1460 0.1350 $2,484.27 $2,297.10 Sr High 9 - 12 $0.00 130 63.83% 0.1550 0.1530 $0.00 $0.00 $2,484.27 $2,297.11 IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION (Spring 2022) V. TAX CREDIT PER RESIDENCE Formula: Expressed as the present value of an annuity TC = PV(interest rate,discount period,average assd value x tax rate) Ave Resid Curr Dbt Sery Bnd Byr Indx Number of Tax Credit Tax Credit Assd Value Tax Rate Ann Int Rate Years Single Family Multi Family Single Family $458,409 $2.13 2.45% 10 $8,567.73 Multi Familv $223.737 $2.13 2.45% 10 $4,181.68 VI. DEVELOPER PROVIDED FACILITY CREDIT Formula: (Value of Site or Facility/Number of dwelling units) Value No. of Units Facility Credit rgle Family $0.00 1 $0.00 ltiF.Mlv $0.00 1 FEE PER UNIT IMPACT FEES Single Multiple RECAP SUMMARY Family Family Site Costs $3,398.39 $4,425.81 Permanent Facility Const Costs $23,251.96 $21,500.10 Temporary Facility Costs $326.88 $378.53 State Match Credit ($2,484.27) ($2,297.11) Tax Credit $8,567.73 $4,181.68 FEE (No Discount) $15,925.22 $19,825.65 FEE (50% Discount) $7,962.61 $9,912.82 Less ASD Discount $0.00 $0.00 Facility Credit $0.00 Net Fee Obligation $7,962.61 $9,912.82 IMPACT FEE ELEMENTS SINGLE FAMILY MULTI FAMILY Elem Mid Sch Sr High Elem Mid Sch Sr High K-5 6-8 9-12 K-5 6-8 9-12 Student Factor Single Family - Auburn actual count April 2022 0.301 0.146 0.156 0.392 0.135 0.153 New Fac Capacity 650 800 1500 650 800 1500 New Facility Cost Middle School Cost Estimate May 2022 $134,320,000 $134,320,000 Temp Rm Capacity ASD District Standard of Service. 20.33 28.02 28,74 20.33 28.02 28.74 Grades K - 5 @ 20.33, 6 - 8 Q 28,02, & 9 - 12 Q 28,74. Temp Facility Cost Relocatables, including site work, set up, and furnishing. $250,000 $260,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 Site Acreage ASD District Standard or SPI Minimum 12 25 40 12 25 40 Site Cost/Acre See below $489,248 $489,248 $489,248 $489,248 $489,248 $489,248 Perm Sq Footage 16 Elementary, 4 Middle, and 4 High Schools 1,835,123 1,835,123 1,835,123 1,835,123 1,835,123 1,835,123 Temp Sq Footage 24 x 864 SF + 85 x 896 SF + TAP 2661 99,557 99,557 99,557 99,557 99,557 99,557 Total Sq Footage Sum of Permanent and Temporary above 1,934,680 1,934,680 1,934,680 1,934,680 1,934,680 1,934,680 -Perm Facilities Permanent Sq. Footage divided by Total Sq. Footage 94.85% 94.85% 94,85% 94.85% 94.85% 94.85% -Temp Facilities Temporary Sq. Footage divided by Total Sq. Footage 5.15% 5.15% 5.15% 5.15% 5.15% 5.15% SPI Sq Ft/Student From OSPI Regulations (WAC 392-343-035) 90 108 130 90 108 130 Boeckh Index From OSPI in May 2022 $246.83 $246.83 $246.83 $246.83 $246.83 $246.83 Match% - State From OSPI May 2022 63.83% 63.83% 63.83% 63.83% 63.83% 63.83% Match% -District Computed 36.17% 36.17% 36.17% 36.17% 36.17% 36.17% Dist Aver AV King County Department of Assessments March 2022 $458,409 $458.409 $458,409 $223,737 $223,737 $223,737 Debt Sery Tax Rate Current Fiscal Year $2.13 $2.13 $2.13 $2.13 $2.13 $2.13 G. O Bond Int Rate Current Rate - (Bond Buyer 20 Index Feb. 2022 avg) 2.45% 2.45% 2.45 % 2.45% 2.45% 2.45% Site Cost Proiections Recent Property Acquisitions Acrea a Purchase Year Purchase Price Purchase Cost/Acre Adjusted Present Day Projected Annual Inflation Factor Sites Required Latest Date ofAc uisition Projected Cost/Acre Elem. #16 Parcel 1 Elem.#16 Parcel Elem. #16 Parcel 3 1.26 8.19 0.80 2019 2019 2018 $480,000 $2,959,561 $460,000 $382,166 $361,363 $575,000 $485,541 $459,111 $803 591 10.00% Elements 2023 $538,173 2019Annual Inflation Factor 10.00% 2020 Annual Inflation Factor 5% 2021 Annual Inflation Factor 10.00% 2022 Annual Inflation Factor 10.00% Total 10.25 $3 899,561 $380,593 $489,248