Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Council Committees - Operations and Public Safety Committee - 11/01/2022 (2)
4^* Operations and Public Safety • Committee KEN T Tuesday, November 1, 2022 WASH I NGTON 4:0 0 PM Chambers To listen to this meeting, call 1-888-475-4499 or 1-877-853-5257 and enter Meeting ID 850 5066 9214, Passcode: 837371 Chair Bill Boyce Councilmember Brenda Fincher Councilmember Satwinder Kaur Councilmember Marli Larimer Councilmember Zandria Michaud Councilmember Les Thomas Councilmember Toni Troutner ************************************************************** Item Description Action Speaker Time 1. Call to Order Chair 2. Roll Call Chair 3. Agenda Approval Chair 4. Business Chair A. Approval of Minutes Approval of October 18, YES Chair 01 MIN. 2022 Minutes B. Payment of Bills - Authorize YES Paula Painter 01 MIN. C. Ordinance to Amend Section YES Christina Schuck 05 MIN. 8.09.030 of the Kent City Code, entitled "Unlawful camping on public property" - Adopt D. Comprehensive Plan YES Paula Painter 05 MIN. Amendment - 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Program - Ordinance - Adopt E. Comprehensive Plan YES Kristen Holdsworth 05 MIN. Amendment and Updated Impact Fees - Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority's Operations and Public Safety Committee CC Ops and November 1, 2022 PS Regular Meeting 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Plan - Ordinance - Adopt F. Comprehensive Plan YES Kristen Holdsworth 05 MIN. Amendment - Kent, Auburn, and Federal Way School Districts' 2023-2028 Capital Facilities Plans - Ordinance - Adopt G. Updated School Impact Fees YES Kristen Holdsworth 05 MIN. - Ordinance - Adopt H. Tax Code Amendments - YES Paula Painter 05 MIN. Ordinance - Adopt I. Property Tax Levy YES Paula Painter 05 MIN. Ordinance - Adopt J. Ordinance Adopting the YES Paula Painter 05 MIN. 2023-2024 Biennial Budget - Adopt 5. Adjournment Chair The public may submit written public comments that relate to a committee agenda item by emailing: cityclerk@kentwa.gov by 3:30 p.m. on the day of this committee meeting. After 3:30 p.m., written public comments may only be submitted in person by presenting them to the committee secretary at the public meeting. Written public comments that do not relate to a committee agenda item are not permitted. Written public comments are not read into the record. Unless otherwise noted, the Operations and Public Safety Committee meets at 4 p.m. on the first and third Tuesday of each month in the Kent City Hall, Council Chambers, 220 Fourth Avenue South, Kent, WA 98032 For additional information please contact Kim Komoto at 253-856-5728, or email Kkomoto@kentwa.gov. Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City Clerk's Office at 253-856- 5725 in advance. For TDD relay service call Washington Telecommunications Relay Service at 7-1-1. Pending Approval Operations and Public Safety KENT Committee WA9H... CC Ops and PS Regular Meeting Minutes October 18, 2022 Date: October 18, 2022 Time: 4:00 p.m. Place: Chambers Members: Bill Boyce, Chair Brenda Fincher, Councilmember Satwinder Kaur, Councilmember Marli Larimer, Councilmember Zandria Michaud, Councilmember Les Thomas, Councilmember o Toni Troutner Councilmember 0 L Agenda: a 1. Call to Order 4:00 p.m. a 0 Council President Boyce called the meeting to order. 2. Roll Call N N O N Attendee Name Title Status Arrived Bill Boyce Chair Present p Brenda Fincher Councilmember Present o Satwinder Kaur Councilmember Present a Marli Larimer Councilmember Present 'c Zandria Michaud Councilmember Present Les Thomas Councilmember Excused Toni Troutner Councilmember Present a d 3. Agenda Approval a 1. I move to approve the agenda as presented. c RESULT: MOTION PASSES [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Toni Troutner, Councilmember SECONDER: Marli Larimer, Councilmember AYES: Boyce, Fincher, Kaur, Larimer, Michaud, Troutner 4. Business A. Approval of Minutes Approval of Minutes dated October 4, 2022 MOTION: Move to approve the Minutes dated October 4, 2022 ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Page I of 3 Packet Pg. 3 Operations and Public Safety Committee CC Ops October 18, 2022 and PS Regular Meeting Kent, Washington Minutes ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._............................................................................................................................................................................................................... RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Toni Troutner, Councilmember SECONDER: Zandria Michaud, Councilmember AYES: Boyce, Fincher, Kaur, Larimer, Michaud, Troutner B. Payment of Bills - Approve MOTION: I move to approve the payment of bills. RESULT: MOTION PASSES [UNANIMOUS] Next: 11/1/2022 5:00 PM MOVER: Marli Larimer, Councilmember SECONDER: Zandria Michaud, Councilmember AYES: Boyce, Fincher, Kaur, Larimer, Michaud, Troutner — C. Write-offs of Uncollectable Accounts - Authorize c L Finance Director, Paula Painter, explained the requested write-offs. a a Of the $116,161.00: $72,445.66 represents unpaid violations and fines; a $20,804.68 is for miscellaneous permits, taxes and fees; $723.77 is o comprised of miscellaneous program fees; and $22,186.89 is miscellaneous Public Works service & repairs. All write-offs are from 2018 and one N bankruptcy from 2019. N MOTION: I move to authorize the Mayor to write-off uncollectable accounts owed to the City in the amount of $116,161.00, subject to 0 final approval of the Finance Director. o a� RESULT: MOTION PASSES [UNANIMOUS] Next: 11/1/2022 5:00 PM MOVER: Zandria Michaud, Councilmember SECONDER: Satwinder Kaur, Councilmember AYES: Boyce, Fincher, Kaur, Larimer, Michaud, Troutner r D. INFO ONLY: August 2022 Financial Report Financial Planning Manager, Michelle Ferguson provided the August 2022 Q Monthly Financial Report. r c Ferguson advised that sales tax revenues continue to come in strong and if they continue at this same pace, there will be an additional $1M over 2021 revenues. Ferguson advised the General Fund Revenues are lower due to lower revenues from fines and forfeitures. Ferguson went over the General Fund year-to-year comparisons and explained the variances. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 4 Operations and Public Safety Committee CC Ops October 18, 2022 and PS Regular Meeting Kent, Washington Minutes ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._............................................................................................................................................................................................................... Ferguson indicated the workers' compensation; liability insurance and property insurance funds will end the year over budget. S. Adjournment 4:10 p.m. Council President Boyce adjourned the meeting. K�f�ley Kcmoto- Committee Secretary as c O O L Q CQ G a 0 0 N N O N t� O O N d r 7 C ui c� C co r� O. d tt V Q N d r� 7 C ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 5 4.B FINANCE DEPARTMENT Paula Painter, CPA 220 Fourth Avenue South \117KENT Kent, WA 98032 WASHINGTON 253-856-5264 DATE: November 1, 2022 TO: Operations and Public Safety Committee SUBJECT: Payment of Bills - Authorize MOTION: I move to authorize the payment of bills. SUMMARY: BUDGET IMPACT: Packet Pg. 6 4.0 ADMINISTRATION Arthur "Pat" Fitzpatrick - Chief Administrative Officer 220 Fourth Avenue South \117KENT Kent, WA 98032 W A S ENT N G T O N 253-856-5700 DATE: November 1, 2022 TO: Operations and Public Safety Committee SUBJECT: Ordinance to Amend Section 8.09.030 of the Kent City Code, entitled ""Unlawful camping on public property" - Adopt MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4444, amending section 8.09.030 of the Kent City Code, entitled "Unlawful camping on public property," to make a non-substantive clarification to the language within this section. SUMMARY: This ordinance makes a minor, technical change to the language within KCC 8.09.030(B). This change is non-substantive and simply clarifies the application of the provisions to public property with sensitive or incompatible uses. If approved by the Committee, this ordinance will proceed to Council at its meeting tonight on the Consent Calendar. BUDGET IMPACT: None. SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Thriving City - Creating safe neighborhoods, healthy people, vibrant commercial districts, and inviting parks and recreation. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Camping Ordinance (PDF) Packet Pg. 7 4.C.a 3 Q C O a'l C .Q E v ORDINANCE NO. 4444 4- c -a AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the r City of Kent, Washington, amending section 8.09.030 of the Kent City Code, entitled "Unlawful camping on public property," to make a technical o clarification to language within this section. r U c RECITALS Y a� A. Ordinance No. 4443, which repealed Chapter 8.09 of the Kent - City Code, entitled "Camping", and replaced it with a new Chapter 8.09, M 0 entitled "Camping on Public Property", was adopted on October 18, 2022. o co 0 r B. This ordinance makes a non-substantive change to the N language within one subsection—KCC 8.09.030(B)—in order to clarify the application of the provisions to public property with sensitive or incompatible M 0 w uses. c CU NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, p WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: N Cl) M ORDINANCE c c SECTION 1. - Amendment - KCC 8.09.030. Section 8.09.030 of the L Kent City Code, entitled "Unlawful camping on public property," is amended a, as follows: E �a U r c 1 Amend KCC 8.09.030 - Re. Camping w r Q Packet Pg. 8 4.C.a Sec. 8.09.030. Unlawful camping on public property. °- 0 a� c A. Unlawful Camping. It shall be unlawful for any person to camp on 0 public property, except as allowed in KCC 4.01.090 of the Kent City Code. 4- B. Public Property with Sensitive or Incompatible Uses. The prohibition on camping shall apply at all times on a public property with the uses listed in this subsection and may be enfei=eed at all times: 1. Portions of parks that are developed, improved, or maintained ;, for a specified purpose, such as but not limited to recreational structures, picnic shelters, play fields, areas designated or maintained for spectators of Y a� events, open fields or maintained grassy areas, designated off-leash dog 4- 0 areas, restrooms, sidewalks, golf courses, designated trails, and parking M 0 lots. CO c 2. Critical areas and water supply properties that are owned by 0 the City for the purposes of producing, pumping, storing, treating, and protecting domestic drinking water sources. a� 3. City-owned buildings, parking lots, and appurtenances used to E conduct the business of the city, including, but not limited to City Hall, the ° a Centennial Center, and the Annex Building located to the east of the c Centennial Center; Kent Police Station and police substations; Kent 0 Municipal Court, Kent Corrections Facility, and its Program Annex Building; M N Kent Senior Center; Kent Commons; Riverbend Golf Complex; public works and parks shops properties; the police and fire station and training center c located at 24611 116t" Ave. SE, Kent, WA 98030; and the accesso Showare E L Center. 0 c .Q E 0 U r c 2 Amend KCC 8.09.030 - Re: Camping 0 r a Packet Pg. 9 4.C.a 4. Streets and sidewalks. 2 ° 5. Properties owned by the city that are not open to the public °- and which are posted with signs prohibiting trespass. 0, .Q E M C. Enforcement Suspended. The authority to arrest and file charges for a violation of this section shall be suspended any time there is no available overnight shelter for the individual camping; provided, any person camping on any of the properties set forth in subsection B of this section shall be a required to immediately remove the camp and its associated camp facilities upon request of a peace officer or other public officer. 0 U SECTION 2. - Severability. If any one or more section, subsection, or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such Y a� decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance 4- 0 and the same shall remain in full force and effect. o M O O O 00 SECTION 3. - Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon 0 approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the a� correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering; or E references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations. ° a c c SECTION 4. - Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be 0 in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law. M N M M N V C fC C November 1, 2022 0 DANA RALPH, MAYOR Date Approved a, c .Q E U r c 3 Amend KCC 8.09.030 - Re: Camping r a Packet Pg. 10 4.C.a a ATTEST: c O a� c .Q E November 1, 2022 KIMBERLEY A. KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted - ca November 4, 2022 Date Published =� a� a� a� APPROVED AS TO FORM: o U U O Y TAMMY WHITE, CITY ATTORNEY 4- 0 0 M O O O co C O r v N N C N E R O N V C cc C L O M N M M N V C cc C E L 0 .Q E cc U r c 4 Amend KCC 8.09.030 - Re: Camping r a Packet Pg. 11 4.D FINANCE DEPARTMENT Paula Painter, CPA 220 Fourth Avenue South \117KENT Kent, WA 98032 W A S ENT N G T O N 253-856-5264 DATE: November 1, 2022 TO: Operations and Public Safety Committee SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Amendment - 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Program — Ordinance - Adopt MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4445, amending the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan to include the 2023- 2028 Capital Improvement Program. SUMMARY: Per procedures established in KCC 12.02, the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan is amended concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the City's budget to reflect the updated 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Program. This process assures that the Comprehensive Plan remains relevant and up to date. The 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Program of the Capital Facilities Element identifies a six-year plan for capital improvement projects, including costs and revenue sources. Council has held two public hearings for this item on October 4, 2022 and October 19, 2022. BUDGET IMPACT: As described. SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Sustainable Services - Providing quality services through responsible financial management, economic growth, and partnerships. ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Program Ordinance (PDF) Packet Pg. 12 4.D.a L 0 L 0 E 0 0 L Q E ORDINANCE NO. 4445 .Q U 00 N AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the N City of Kent, Washington, amending the Kent N Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities N Element to reflect a six-year plan for capital improvement projects (2023-2028) (CPA-2022-1). a 0 Q a� RECITALS c L A. The State of Washington Growth Management Act (GMA) 00 requires the City to have a Capital Facilities Element within its M Comprehensive Plan. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.070(3), the Capital Facilities Element must include a six-year plan that shows how the City will finance such capital facilities within projected funding capacities and identifies o sources of funding for such purposes. 2 a� 0 L B. To assure that comprehensive plans remain relevant and up to date, the GMA allows amendments to the capital facilities element of 0 comprehensive plans concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a a E city budget, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130. r .Q U C. The City of Kent has established procedures for amending the N 0 Comprehensive Plan in Chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code (KCC), allowing Cl) N O N r-+ C 1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Capital Facilities Element for 2023-2028 Capital Improvements CU a Packet Pg. 13 4.D.a amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan E L concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the City's budget. As part 0 L of these procedures the City Council may hold the public hearing instead of a c aD the Land Use and Planning Board as laid out in KCC 12.02.010. E 0 L Q D. The City of Kent Finance Department has submitted proposed E amendments to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to a identify a six-year plan for capital improvement projects, including costs co N and revenue sources. N M N O N E. On September 15, 2022, the City provided the State of Washington the required 60-day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 of the a City's proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the a Comprehensive Plan. The 60-day notice period passed on November 14, 2022. c E L 0 F. On September 27, 2022, the City's SEPA responsible official co M issued a SEPA Addendum to existing environmental documents consisting M a� of the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan Review and Midway Subarea c Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Draft and Final 0 (ENV-2010-3) and the Downtown Subarea Action Plan Supplemental EIS E 0 L Draft and Final (ENV-2012-30). The SEPA Addendum explained that the o L proposed amendment would not create unavoidable impacts beyond those a previously identified in the EIS. E 0 L Q G. After providing appropriate public notice, the City Council of E the City of Kent conducted public hearings on October 4, 2022, and October a 18, 2022, to consider the six-year plan for capital improvements and the co N requested amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities N Cl) Element. o N r-+ C 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Capital Facilities Element for 2023-2028 Capital Improvements CU a Packet Pg. 14 4.D.a L H. On November 15, 2022, the City Council for the City of Kent o L approved the Capital Facilities Element amendment to the Kent a a� Comprehensive Plan (CPA-2022-1) to reflect a six-year plan for capital E improvement projects (2023-2028). a E NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, a WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: co N O N M ORDINANCE o N L Q1 SECTION 1. - Amendment. The City of Kent Comprehensive Plan a and its Capital Facilities Element are hereby amended to reflect a six-year a plan for capital improvement projects (2023-2028), as set forth in Exhibit c "A" attached and incorporated by this reference (CPA-2022-1). � E L 0 SECTION 2. - Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon co M approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are M a� authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the c correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering; or 0 references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations. E L 0 L SECTION 3. - Severability. If any one or more section, subsection, a c or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such E decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance P a and the same shall remain in full force and effect. E r .Q SECTION 4. - Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be co N in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law. N M N O N r-+ C 3 Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Capital Facilities Element for 2023-2028 Capital Improvements cc a Packet Pg. 15 4.D.a November 15, 2022 E DANA RALPH, MAYOR Date Approved 0 L ATTEST: 0 E a� 0 0. November 15, 2022 E KIMBERLEY A. KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted .Q November 18, 2022 U Date Published N 0 N M N APPROVED AS TO FORM: N as a� c a TAMMY WHITE, CITY ATTORNEY -°a Q as U c 0 c =a S:\Permit\Plan\COMP_PLAN_AMEN DMENTS\2022\City CIP\Ord_CompPlanAmend-CapitalImprovePlan.docx O 00 N M M d V C C L O E L 0 L ♦2 d E > 0 L Q E .Q U 00 N O N M N O N 4 Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Capital Facilities Element for 2023-2028 Capital Improvements a Packet Pg. 16 4.D.a M am O L a c a� 2023 � 2028 E 0 0. �a Capital .Q �a U N O M N O N d t r O) C O Im rovement M _ o 00 Program N v O t� C O C L 0 E cc November 1, 2022 a m E m O L O. E r M 4j U O N%mo0o"` KE T cm O N M WAS H ING T 0 K N O N C d E t 0 O r r+ Q Packet Pg. 17 4.D.a L O L E O L Q E .Q U 00 N O N CO) N O N N t aI C a+ • Q O Q N v C C L O Co N • KENT V A H I N TON r_ c :a L O E L O L d E a) 7 O L • Q E .Q U Co N O N M N O N C N E t V Q 2 Packet Pg. 18 4.D.a CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2023-2028 SUMMARY PROJECTS AND FUNDING o L Capital project costs for the City's 2023-2028 capital planning period total $215.1 million and are funded with a� City,utility and other resources, as illustrated in the following tables. Additional details follow. E m O L • cQ C Summary Resources 2023 20241 1 City Resources $ 37,087 $ 33,011 $ 66,269 $ 136,367 Q Utility Resources 20,023 16,795 67,285 104,103 U Other Resources 1,092 1,111 370 2,573 00 N Total-in thousands $ 58,202 $ 50,917 $ 133,924 $ 243,043 c N CO) N O N Summary Costs 2023 20241 1 t General Government $ 24,405 $ 20,724 $ 13,623 $ 58,752 Parks,Rec&Comm Services 5,466 4,983 21,411 31,860 r Transportation 8,295 8,415 31,605 48,315 p Utilities 20,036 16,795 67,285 104,116 Q Total-in thousands $ 58,202 S 50,917 $ 133,924 $ 243,043 v C la C :a L O Sources of Funds - N M M Utility v Resources • O 43% C E Other 0 Resources 1% R L • 0 City Resources 0_ 56% C d E > O Proiects by Category a General • Government Q' R Utilities 24% U 43% 00 N O N M N O N Parks, Rec & • N Comm Services E Transportation 13% 20% Q ■ Packet Pg. 19 4.D.a CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM _ l L OPERATING IMPACT OF MAJOR CIP PROJECTS o a The impact of a capital project on the operating budget is a key factor in considering the inclusion of a project in the six-year plan. The operating costs of a project,and any savings resulting from the project,are captured m in the Operating Budget. a E SOURCES OF FUNDS-in thousands .Q U 2023 i i i o N O Sources of Funds N CO) City Resources $ 37,087 $ 33,011 $ 16,457 $ 16,296 $ 16,637 $ 16,879 $ 136,367 N 0 Utility Resources 20,023 16,795 17,100 16,965 16,585 16,635 104,103 N Other Resources 1,092 1,111 370 - - - 2,573 t Total Sources of Funds $ 58,202 $ 50,917 $ 33,927 $ 33,261 $ 33,222 $ 33,514 $ 243,043 C • O 2023 Q 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 TotalN v C City Resources C Business&Occupation Tax $ 6,975 $ 7,125 $ 7,267 $ 7,163 $ 7,311 $ 7,712 $ 43,553 'a CRF General 12,319 13,440 1,745 1,750 1,750 1,750 32,754 O CRF REET2 1,486 1,673 1,787 2,184 2,483 2,235 11,848 ap Golf Admissions Tax 815 135 130 120 135 175 1,510 M IT HLC/SLC Reserves 200 45 245 accesso ShoWare Funds 2,500 325 615 300 300 300 4,340 U C Criminal Justice Fund 1,144 1,144 Streets Lifecycle 1,000 1,000 '13 L Faciltities Lifecycle 1,194 1,114 837 653 482 481 4,761 O IT Operating Fund 258 363 590 640 690 740 3,281 E R Utility Funding 5,512 5,087 10,599 0) Streets-Solid Waste Utility Tax 3,684 3,704 3,486 3,486 3,486 3,486 21,332 OL IL Total City Resources 37,087 33,011 16,457 16,296 16,637 16,879 136,367 r C d Utility Resources Drainage Revenues 9,688 6,730 6,050 6,050 6,050 6,050 40,618 i Sewer Revenues 3,059 1,765 3,550 3,550 3,550 3,550 19,024 Q- E Water Revenues 7,277 8,300 7,500 7,365 6,985 7,035 44,462 -_ Total Utility Resources 20,023 16,795 17,100 16,965 16,585 16,635 104,103 R U Other Resources ao American Rescue Plan Act(ARPA) 520 550 1,070 N 0 LID Funded 202 191 393 N M King County Levy 370 370 370 1,110 p Total Other Resources 1,092 1,111 370 2,573 N C Total Sources of Funds $ 58,202 $ 50,917 $ 33,927 $ 33,261 $ 33,222 $ 33,514 $ 243,043 E E t v ca Q 4 Packet Pg. 20 4.D.a CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY BY SOURCE 2023-2028 o . a $in Thousands d 70,000 O Q. 60,000 E 50,000 W Q- ca U 40,000 O N O N 30,000 N O 20,000 N N t 10,000 r _ Q- O 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Q H City Resources 0 Utility Resources ! Other Resources — v C CID ca C 2023 SOURCES BY TYPE 0 N M M Sewer Revenues Drainage Revenues 5% • O 17% 1 rn Water Revenues -✓3 L 13% rn 0 Streets CRF REET 2 R Solid Waste 3% Utility Tax 0 0 6% Golf Admissions Tax IZ IT HLC/SLC Reserves 0.3% 0) Criminal Justice Fund Other 2% >O Utility 12% Q Funding Streets Lifecycle 2% — 9% Faciltities Lifecycle I • ��-6' 2% Q" R ShoWare \ L IT Operating Fund0.4°/ 00 Funds Funds ARPA 1% N O 4% Kin Count Lev 1% M Business&Occupation Tax N O 12% N CRF General • N 21% z E t V cC Q ■ Packet Pg. 21 4.D.a CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM L PROJECTS-in thousands o a E 2023 20241 126 2027 2028 , d O L Projects Q- General Government $ 24,405 $ 20,724 $ 3,787 $ 3,343 $ 3,222 $ 3,271 $ 58,752 E Parks,Rec&Comm Services 5,466 4,983 5,148 5,222 5,595 5,446 31,860 4D Transportation 8,295 8,415 7,892 7,731 7,820 8,162 48,315 Utilities 20,036 16,795 17,100 16,965 16,585 16,635 104,116 V ao Total Projects $ 58,202 $ 50,917 $ 33,927 $ 33,261 $ 33,222 $ 33,514 $ 243,043 c N CO) N O N a) 2023 20241 126 2027 2028 +�+ aI C General Government Q accesso ShoWare Center $ 2,430 $ 325 $ 615 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 4,270 O Facilities 17,424 17,098 837 653 482 481 36,975 Q a� Technology 4,551 3,301 2,335 2,390 2,440 2,490 17,507 U c Total General Government 24,405 20,724 3,787 3,343 3,222 3,271 58,752 to c :a Parks,Rec&Comm Services O Golf 815 135 130 120 135 175 1,510 00 Parks and Recreation 4,651 4,848 5,018 5,102 5,460 5,271 30,350 N M Total Parks,Rec&Comm Svcs 5,466 4,983 5,148 5,222 5,595 5,446 31,860 M a) U Transportation Site Improvements 8,295 8,415 7,892 7,731 7,820 8,162 48,315 E Total Transportation 8,295 8,415 7,892 7,731 7,820 8,162 48,315 O Utilities Iv L Water 7,258 8,300 7,500 7,365 6,985 7,035 44,443 0) O L. Sewer 3,050 1,765 3,550 3,550 3,550 3,550 19,015 (L r Drainage 9,674 6,730 6,050 6,050 6,050 6,050 40,604 Combined Utility Projects 54 - - - - - 54 E a) Total Utilities 20,036 16,795 17,100 16,965 16,585 16,635 104,116 > O L Q Total Projects $ 58,202 $ 50,917 $ 33,927 $ 33,261 $ 33,222 $ 33,514 $ 243,043 E r .Q O U Ib N O N M N O N C N E t V tQ Q 6 Packet Pg. 22 4.D.a CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM L SUMMARY BY CATEGORY 2023-2028 a $in Thousands E m 70,000 O L Q 60,000 E 50,000 • Q- ca . U 00 40,000 N 0 N CO) 30,000 N 0 N N 20,000 aI C 10,000 O Q 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 v C ca W General Government o Parks,Rec&Comm Services 6d Transportation o Utilities E L O 00 2023 BY CATEGORY FUNCTION Cl M d V Water _ Sewer — cc 14% x 4% Combined Utility :a Projects L � O Drainage "'% E L Transportation 15% � 15% I • 0- Other m 0.92% aa) -------___ Golf 0.87% p - -- --- accesso -- a Parks and Recreation ShoWare E 9% Center ; • 2.5% !i O Technology U 00 7% N C N M N O N Facilities 32% • O E t ca Q ■ Packet Pg. 23 4.D.a CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM GENERAL GOVERNMENT-in thousands o L TotalW E Sources of Funds o CRF Genera I Ca pita 1 $ 12,261 $ 13,440 $ 1,745 $ 1,750 $ 1,750 $ 1,750 $ 32,696 Q. American Rescue Plan Act(ARPA) 336 350 686 E accesso ShoWare Funds 2,500 325 615 300 300 300 4,340 IT Operating Fund 258 363 590 640 690 740 3,281 Q Criminal Justice Fund 1,144 1,144 U Streets Lifecycle 1,000 1,000 00 Utility Funding 5,512 5,087 10,599 0 Facilities Fund Balance 629 533 238 36 1,436 N CO) Faciltities Lifecycle 565 581 599 617 482 481 3,325 0 HLC/SLC Reserves 200 45 245 N W Total Sources of Funds $ 24,405 $20,724 $ 3,787 $ 3,343 $ 3,222 $ 3,271 $ 58,752 Projects Facilities 0 Facilities Reinvestment Fund 5,000 5,000 10,000 Q Kent East Hill Operations Center Phase 10,512 10,285 20,797 U Siemens HVAC Controls Upgrades 230 230 Police Headquarters Cooling Tower Upgrade 224 224 :a Senior Center SolarPanel(GrantMatch) 120 120 O Kent Police Department Facility Upgrade 350 350 00 Police Firing Range Upgrades 350 350 M Corrections Annex Fence 144 144 M City Buildings-Exterior Painting 255 202 50 50 50 50 657 m Public Building Major Maintenance 59 60 62 64 66 68 379 c HVAC Replacements 150 400 300 100 950 Emergency Repairs 215 123 120 125 125 125 833 'a Access Control 25 25 25 25 25 25 150 O Furniture,Fixtures,and Equipment 100 100 100 100 100 100 600 E Fire Alarm Upgrades 50 50 50 50 50 50 300 Kitchen Equipment 25 25 25 25 25 25 150 0 Roof Repairs 300 50 60 410 d r Floor Covering Replacements 120 120 m Parking Lots Repair 15 8 55 54 41 38 211 aEi Total Facilities 17,424 17,098 837 653 482 481 36,975 L Q accesso ShoWare(enter E Audio System Replacement 300 300cu Suite and Club Rebranding 75 75 Q Television Monitors 60 60 U Half House Curtain and Vom Drapes 120 120 00 Upgrade and add Security Cameras 80 80 0 N Chairs and Tables 50 50 75 50 225 M _ Mural Replacement 15 15 15 15 60 0 Flooring Replacement Elevators/Production Room 17 17 N Locker Room/Dressing Room Upgrade 40 40 c a� Building for Storage 150 150 E Basket Ball Court Refurbish 39 39 Concession Stand Rebranding 184 184 Marquee 200 200 Q Self Checkout Technology 300 300 8 Packet Pg. 24 4.D.a CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM GENERAL GOVERNMENT CONTINUED—in thousands o L (L •F+ 2023 20241 126 2027 2028 N Lighting Control System 125 125 • Additional Rigging Steel 100 100 0 Additional Fall Protection 75 75 E j_ Ribbon Board 500 500 Stadium Seating Replacement 50 50 Zamboni Replacement 110 110 ca Roof Repair 100 100 V Floor Covering in Skate Areas 75 75 N Chiller Replacement 450 450 N Unallocated - - 235 300 300 835 M N Total accesso ShoWare Center 2,430 325 615 300 300 300 4,270 N N t Technology +' HLC-Server Replacement 60 60 60 60 60 60 360 c HLC-Telephony 60 60 60 60 60 60 360 _ HLC-Wireless Infrastructure Refresh 30 30 30 30 30 30 180 HLC-Data Center 100 100 100 100 100 100 600 Q HLC-Network Refresh 70 70 70 70 70 70 420 v C HLC-Security 130 153 130 130 130 130 803 HLC-Storage Expansion 30 30 30 30 30 30 180 :a HLC-UPS 30 30 30 30 30 30 180 - 0 HLC-Virtualization Infrastructure Refresh 100 100 100 100 100 100 600 SLC-Administration System Replacement Reserves 170 170 170 170 170 170 1,020 N SLC-IT System Replacement Reserves 150 150 150 150 150 150 900 SLC-Law System Replacement Reserves 50 50 50 50 50 50 300 SLC-Police System Replacement Reserves 170 130 130 130 130 130 820 v C SLC-Human Resources System Replacement Reserves 70 70 70 70 70 70 420 C SLC-Finance System Replacement Reserves 100 100 100 100 100 100 600 SLC-PRCS System Replacement Reserves 100 100 100 100 100 100 600 0 SLC-Public Works System Replacement Reserves 100 150 150 150 150 150 850 j_ SLC-Court System Replacement Reserves 50 50 50 50 50 50 300 SLC-Economic Development System Replacement Reserves 80 80 80 80 80 80 480 p L MDC Refresh 100 110 120 130 140 600 IL Computer Refresh 258 263 480 520 560 600 2,681 Aerial Imagery Data Refresh 165 85 85 90 90 90 605 E Airgap Backup Implementation&Commvault Replacement 660 660 ZTAProgram-Identify&Access Management Solution 300 300 0 ZTAProgram-ShoWare Center 70 70 Q- InternetlnfrastructureAssessmentandUpgrade 275 275 E AV/Virtual Court Room Technology Refresh 100 100 • �° B&0 and Business License Enhancements 480 175 655 Q- R JDE Replacement 250 250 500 C) Laserfiche Stabilization 45 45 90 00 N UPS Battery Replacement(Fire Station 74) 80 80 N ZTA Program-Privileged Access Management Solution 250 250 N PD MDC Refresh 250 250 0 N AS Replacement 75 75 ; Unallocated IT Projects 168 175 343 y Total Technology Projects 4,551 3,301 2,335 2,390 2,440 2,490 17,507 t Total General Government Projects 24,405 20,724 3,787 3,343 3,222 3,271 58,752 Q ■ Packet Pg. 25 4.D.a CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PARKS, RECREATION &COMMUNITY SERVICES—in thousands o L E Sources of Funds 0 0 L CRFREET2 $ 1,486 $ 1,673 $ 1,787 $ 2,184 $ 2,483 $ 2,235 $ 11,848 0. E CRF-General Capital 45 45 — B&O Tax 2,750 2,805 2,861 2,918 2,977 3,036 17,347 Golf Admissions Tax 100 100 100 100 100 100 600 Q' co Golf Fund Balance 715 35 30 20 35 75 910 V 00 King County Levy 370 370 370 - 1,110 c Total Sources of Funds 5,466 4,983 5,148 5,222 5,595 5,446 31,860 N CO) N Projects N Golf Projects m t Benches 25 25 Bunker Sand 30 10 10 50 Cart Path Repairs and Repaving 125 25 25 25 200 p Driving Range Stall Heaters 35 35 Q Driving Range West Side Improvements 100 100 U Driving Range Net Replacement 35 50 50 50 185 Garbage Cans 30 30 :a Golf Cart Storage Doors 20 40 60 Irrigation Central Controller 40 40 80 Irrigation Satellite Controllers 125 25 25 25 200 M Irrigation Pump Replacement 50 50 Maintenance Equipment Replacement 175 175 0) On-Course Restrooms 40 40 Parking Lot Landscaping 30 35 65 Sprinkler Heads 70 20 20 20 20 150 Tee Signs 38 38 0 0 Miscellaneous Golf Projects 22 5 - 27 L Total Golf Projects 815 135 130 120 135 175 1,510 p L d E 7 0 L E .Q U 00 N O N M N O N C E t V Q 10 Packet Pg. 26 4.D.a CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM I PARKS, RECREATION &COMMUNITY SERVICES—in thousands o L 2025 2026 2027 2028 TotalE Parks and Recreation Projects a Campus Park Improvements 150 150 E Canterbury Park improvements 100 200 300 Clark Lake Park Phase 1 Development 250 500 1,000 750 750 1,000 4,250 Q Commercial Onsite Dumpsters 45 45 U Commons Neighborhood Park Improvements 100 100 00 N Downtown Parks Improvements 250 400 200 186 1,036 N East Hill North Neighborhood Park Development 250 750 1,000 CO) N Eastridge Park Renovation 100 150 250 N Garrison Park Improvements 350 250 600 t Hogan Park at Russell Road Phase 2 Renovation 250 350 250 750 1,600 Kent School District Parternship 100 100 r Kiwanis Tot Lot#4 Renovation 36 36 0 Q- o KLVT-Old Fishing Hole Improvements 250 500 750 Q KVLT-Boeing Rock Improvements 177 250 427 _ KVLT-Interurban Trail at Naden 420 420 N r_ KVLT-Meeker Parking Lot 355 355 M S Lake Fenwick Park Phase 2Improvements 350 250 600 -0 Mill Creek Canyon/Earthworks Park Improvements 500 750 750 750 750 1,000 4,500 Mill Creek Canyon Trail Renovation 250 250 250 750 N North Meridian Park Redevelopment 200 211 318 500 1,229 3 .MM. Park Land Acquisition Account 250 250 250 250 250 250 1,500 m Park Operations Lifecycle 500 500 500 500 500 500 3,000 0 c Park Orchard Park Improvements 50 150 250 450 rnc Park Planning and Design(Masterplan/Architect) 50 50 50 150 0 Park Planning and Development Operating 850 893 937 984 1,033 1,085 5,782 Parks and Open Space Plan 250 250 L Scenic Hill Park Renovation 150 200 350 0 Sun Meadows Park Improvements 170 170 2, a West Fenwick Park Phase 2 Renovation 200 - - 200 c m Total Parks and Recreation Projects 4,651 4,848 5,018 5,102 5,460 5,271 30,350 E a� Total Projects 5,466 4,983 5,148 5,222 5,595 5,446 31,860 L E • +° Q 71 U N O N M N O N C • E t V Q ■ Packet Pg. 27 4.D.a CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM L TRANSPORTATION-in thousands o L E Sources of Funds 0 Business&Occupation Tax $ 4,225 $ 4,320 $ 4,406 $ 4,245 $ 4,334 $ 4,676 $ 26,206 E American Rescue Plan Act(ARPA) 184 200 384 LID Funded Projects 202 191 393 to CL Solid Waste Utility Tax 3,684 3,704 3,486 3,486 3,486 3,486 21,332 M Total Sources of Funds $ 8,295 $ 8,415 $ 7,892 $ 7,731 $ 7,820 $ 8,162 $ 48,315 V 00 N Projects o N B&OIn-house Overlays 250 250 250 250 250 250 1,500 CO) B&O Street Contracted 655 750 1,891 3,425 3,214 3,806 13,741 0 B&O Unallocated 200 200 200 200 500 500 1,800 N N LID 362-84th Avenue Rehabilitation 176 167 343 LID 363-224th-228th(EVH-88th) 26 24 50 Residential Street Contracted 3,684 3,704 3,486 3,486 3,486 3,486 21,332 Q EVH(212th-196th) 1,445 1,445 O Litter Strike Team 184 200 384 Q Meet Me on Meeker 64th Avenue 1,000 1,000 a) Mill Creek at 76th Avenue Flood Prevention 3,000 1,500 4,500 SR509-Stage lb-SR 516 Interchange Auxiliary Lane 250 250 500 SR 509-Stage 2-Southbound Auxilia ry Lane 250 250 250 250 1,000 O City Safety Transportation Program 120 120 120 120 120 120 720 .. 00 N M M d V C C L O E L O L d E 7 O • Q E .Q U 00 N O N M N O N C N E t V Q 12 Packet Pg. 28 4.D.a CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM L UTILITIES-in thousands o a 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Totalc a� E Sources of Funds Water Revenues $ 7,277 $ 8,300 $ 7,500 $ 7,365 $ 6,985 $ 7,035 $ 44,462 0 Sewer Revenues 3,059 1,765 3,550 3,550 3,550 3,550 19,024 E E Drainage Revenues 9,688 6,730 6,050 6,050 6,050 6,050 40,617 Capital Resource Fund 13 13 a Total Sources of Funds $ 20,036 $ 16,795 $ 17,100 $ 16,965 $ 16,585 $ 16,635 $ 104,115 V 00 Projects N Water Supply&Distribution CO) 2023 Watermain 300 300 0 N 228th-Central-88thWaterline 1,000 1,000 y 590 Zone Transmission(EH 640 PZ) 980 980 640 Pressure Zone 2,000 2,500 4,500 640 Transmission Main Improvements(EH 640 PZ) 1,115 1,115 2,230 _ a 640 Zone BPS#2 (EH 640 PZ) 1,300 400 1,700 Q 76th North 525 525 Caustic Tank Replacement EH Well&PS 5 250 250 c 00 Clark&Kent Springs Chlorination Improvements 350 350 c CSTM/590PZ Intertie 200 200 Garrison/0'BrienTreatment Plant 1,300 1,300 O 11 Generator Improvement Program 1,000 1,000 3:1 00 N Hwy 169 Black Diamond-TACOMA 500 500 M Miscellaneous Water 500 500 500 500 500 500 3,000 PLC Upgrades 35 35 35 35 35 35 210 Reservoir Recoating 500 500 500 500 500 500 3,000 • c Rock Creek Mitigation Projects 500 500 1,000 Security I mprovements per VA 50 50 50 50 50 50 300 SR516/Covington Way-CSTM&KSTM 500 500 500 500 2,000 R L Tacomalntertie-Ongoing Capital 50 50 50 50 50 500 750 0 Transmission Easements 50 50 50 50 50 50 300 M a Wapato Creek 509 AlexanderAvenue-TACOMA 400 400 Water Meter Replacement Program 3,000 2,000 5,000 E Watermain Replacements/Repairs 698 535 450 2,465 500 500 5,148 Well Rehabilitation 200 200 400 400 300 400 1,900 Q West Hill Booster Pump Station 1,000 1,400 400 2,800 0E West Hill Transmission Main 2,150 1,650 - - - - 3,800 • Total Water Supply&Distribution 7,258 8,300 7,500 7,365 6,985 7,035 44,443 nQ U Sewer N Derbyshire 1,000 1,000 N Frager Rd Pump Station-Grinder 100 100 ' �"� N Horseshoe Acres Pump Station 1,000 2,500 1,000 1,000 5,500 N Linda Heights Pump Station 2,500 2,500 c Miscellaneous Pump Station Rehab 75 75 75 250 500 500 1,475 • Miscellaneous Sewer - 500 500 500 1,000 1,000 3,500 t Sewer Main Replacements/Relining 325 140 425 750 1,000 2,000 4,640 J Sewer Root Maintenance 50 50 50 50 50 50 300 Q Total Sewer 3,050 1,765 3,550 3,550 3,550 3,550 19,015 ■ Packet Pg. 29 4.D.a CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM L UTILITIES CONTINUED-in thousands a E > 0 L Q Stormwater Management E 267th Culvert $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000 $ - $ 1,000 81stAvenue Pump Station 1,000 600 250 1,900 250 4,000 Q Drainage Property Maintenance 200 200 200 200 200 200 1,200 U East Tacoma/Kennsington - 00 N GRNRA Pump Station North 430 2,575 2,350 2,050 2,350 9,755 N GRNRA Security&Maintenance 50 50 500 500 500 500 2,100 CO) N Kent Airport Levee 500 100 600 N Lake Meridian Estate Outfall 1,000 1,000 m t Lower Russell Road Levee 250 250 Mill Creek at 76th Avenue Flood Protection 4,000 4,000 Mill Creek Culvert Maintenance 250 250 250 250 250 250 1,500 Q- 0 Mill Creek Rehabilitation 2,500 1,705 4,205 Q Misc Environmental Projects 50 50 50 50 50 50 300 a) Miscellaneous Drainage 300 300 600 North Fork Meridian Valley Culvert 500 500 1,000 =a Pipe Replacements/Relining 644 1,000 950 500 950 5,050 9,094 O Total Stormwater Management 9,674 6,730 6,050 6,050 6,050 6,050 40,604 00 M Combined Utility Projects Automate Shops Parking Gate 54 54 Total Combined Utility Projects 54 54 c�c c =a L Total Utilities Projects $ 20,036 $ 16,795 $ 17,100 $ 16,965 $ 16,585 $ 16,635 $ 104,116 0 E R L 0 L. d E 7 0 • Q E .Q U 00 N O N M N O N C E t V Q 14 Packet Pg. 30 4.E ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Kurt Hanson, AICP, EDFP 220 Fourth Avenue South KENT Kent, WA 98032 WASHINGTON 253-856-5454 DATE: November 1, 2022 TO: Operations and Public Safety Committee SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Updated Impact Fees — Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority's 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Plan — Ordinance - Adopt MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4446, amending the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan by adopting the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority's 2023- 2028 Capital Improvement Plan, including updating the Fire Impact Fees. SUMMARY: The Kent City Code authorizes fire impact fees in Chapter 12.15, pursuant to Chapter 82.02 RCW. The impact fee is based on the capital facilities and equipment plan developed by the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority (PSRFA) and approved by the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority governing board. This ordinance incorporates the 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Plan adopted by the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority into the Comprehensive Plan Capital Facilities Element, and updates Fire Impact Fees per Attachment "A" to the Ordinance. City Council held a public hearing on this item on October 18, 2022. BUDGET IMPACT: As described. SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Innovative Government - Delivering outstanding customer service, developing leaders, and fostering innovation. Thriving City - Creating safe neighborhoods, healthy people, vibrant commercial districts, and inviting parks and recreation. Sustainable Services - Providing quality services through responsible financial management, economic growth, and partnerships. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority's 2023-2028 CIP - Ordinance (PDF) Packet Pg. 31 4.E.a c FL m ORDINANCE NO. 4446 as as L Q E 0 AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the ) City of Kent, Washington, amending the Kent Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities Element to include the Six-Year Capital o Improvement Plan of the Puget Sound Regional Fire a Authority (CPA-2022-2). c c RECITALS o A. Pursuant to RCW 82.02.050, impact fees may be collected and cm spent only for the public facilities which are addressed by the City's Capital c Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. In order to collect fire impact fees to be spent by the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority (RFA), the City o must adopt the RFA's Capital Improvement Plan into the City's Capital a U Facilities Plan Element. N 0 N O B. During the development permitting process, Fire Impact Fees N N are assessed and collected pursuant to Chapter 12.15 of the Kent City Code, 0 and the amount of the fees are determined through the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority's Six-Year Capital Improvement Plan. a U_ C. For the purpose of continuing to benefit from the City's 0 a� assessment of Fire Impact Fees, and to update the impact fee amounts, the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority submitted a proposed amendment to 0 U) their Six-Year Capital Improvement Plan for the years 2023 through 2028 to be included in an amendment of the City's Capital Facilities Element of a a� E 1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment— U Capital Facilities Element and Six-Year r Capital Improvement Plan for RFA a Packet Pg. 32 4.E.a the Comprehensive Plan. c a D. To assure that comprehensive plans remain relevant and up to date, the GMA allows amendments to the capital facilities element of comprehensive plans concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a city a budget. RCW 36.70A.130(2)(a)(iv). o U a� t E. The City of Kent has established procedures for amending its c Comprehensive Plan in Chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code (KCC). KCC o 12.02.010(A)(5) allows amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the a aD Comprehensive Plan concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the c City budget. In that circumstance, the City Council holds the public hearing Ea 0 on the Comprehensive Plan amendment rather than the Land Use and v Planning Board. cm (D c F. On September 7, 2022, the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Governance Board voted to adopt Resolution 186 approving the 0 Puget Sound RFA 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Plan and Resolution 187 a U approving the Puget Sound RFA 2023 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy. N 0 N O G. On September 15, 2022, the City provided the required 60-day N N notification under RCW 36.70A.106 to the Department of Commerce for the r L 0 State of Washington of the City's proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The 60-day notice period a passed on November 14, 2022. c 0 m H. After providing appropriate public notice, the City Council of the City of Kent considered the requested Comprehensive Plan amendment o U) and held a public hearing on October 18, 2022. a� a c aD E 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment— 0 Capital Facilities Element and Six-Year r Capital Improvement Plan for RFA Q Packet Pg. 33 4.E.a I. On September 27, 2022, the City's SEPA responsible official c issued a SEPA Addendum to existing environmental documents consisting a of the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan Review and Midway Subarea Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Draft and Final a� (ENV-2010-3) and the Downtown Subarea Action Plan Supplemental EIS Draft and Final (ENV-2012-30). The SEPA Addendum explained that the L) a) proposed amendment would not create unavoidable impacts beyond those r a� previously identified in the EIS. r a 0 a NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: o v N ORDINANCE M (D SECTION 1. - Amendment. The Kent Comprehensive Plan, and its Capital Facilities Element, are amended to include the Six-Year Capital L Improvement Plan of the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority for the years a 2023 through 2028, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached and incorporated by U 00 this reference. o N M N SECTION 2. - Fire Impact Fee Schedule. Pursuant to KCC 12.15.070 y r and 12.15.100, the updated Fire Impact Fee schedule provided in o Attachment A to the Six-Year Capital Improvement Plan of the Puget Sound Q Regional Fire Authority for years 2023-2028 is hereby adopted, and Fire ;v U_ Impact Fees shall be collected in accordance with Chapter 12.12 KCC. 0 m SECTION 3, - Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are o U) authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the a� correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering; or a 4J r_ aD E 3 Comprehensive Plan Amendment— 0 Capital Facilities Element and Six-Year r Capital Improvement Plan for RFA Q Packet Pg. 34 4.E.a references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations. c a SECTION 4. - Severability. If any one or more section, subsection, or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, that decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance a and the same shall remain in full force and effect. o U a� t SECTION 5, - Effective Date. This ordinance will take effect and be c in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law. o a November 15, 2022 = DANA RALPH, MAYOR Date Approved o ATTEST: M M V November 15, 2022 KIMBERLEY A. KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted L O November 18, 2022 a Date Published U 00 N APPROVED AS TO FORM: N M N Co N N r TAMMY WHITE, CITY ATTORNEY o t Q a� L U_ 0 NNQ� I.b r a c aD E 4 Comprehensive Plan Amendment— 0 Capital Facilities Element and Six-Year r Capital Improvement Plan for RFA Q Packet Pg. 35 4.E.a • a m N c as as L Fire Authority Capital Improvement Plan Q Puget Sound Regional 0 U a� t r c r O Q d v C R C _ --- - N M N = .. C� C - - C L O Q. U 00 N O N M N O N N r �L v a 0 z 0 T a� c 0 2023 2028 a c m E z U 0 r r Q Packet Pg. 36 4.E.a Intentionally left blank a L Q E 0 U a� t r c r O Q d v C R C 'a L O N M M N V C fC C L O U 00 N O N M N O N N A r �L O Y a L LL O IIO^ V! a c N E z U r r Q 2 ge Puget Sound Fire 2023—2028 Capital Plan Packet Pg. 37 4.E.a Six-Year Update to the 2014-2033 Capital Facilities & Equipment Plan 2023-2028 Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority 0 U a� t This Plan was prepared and implemented through the collaboration and work of the following leadership, key staff members and their associates: o a Fire Chief " Matthew Morris Ea 0 Assistant Chief cm Brian Carson Finance Director 0 Lavina Brennecke a U 00 N Deputy Chiefs N M Mark Jones-Fleet and Facilities N Dan Conroy-Strategic Resource Management L 0 Division Chiefs a Pat Pawlak-Facilities U_ Sean Penwell-Performance Measurement 0 GIS and Data Analysts Savanna Nagorski, Kelley Jensen, and Sameer Ahmed 0 r IL c a� E t r r Q 3 � Puget Sound Fire 2023—2028 Capital Plan Packet Pg. 38 4.E.a Intentionally left blank a L Q E 0 U a� t r c r O Q d v C R C 'a L O N M M N V C fC C L O U 00 N O N M N O N N A r �L O Y a L LL O IIO^ V! a c N E z U r r Q 4 Page Puget Sound Fire 2023—2028 Capital Plan Packet Pg. 39 4.E.a This plan has been implemented through the following Resolution and the Board Members Identified below. REO WAILLEr RFIIRE AUTNORRY d Professicnvllyond Carnposs, iot*hefpin9 neap+- a)^rT=RNp.T:GN+�II".4CCRFDITED r PC aGFNuY >_ Mat Meffis fire Chie= .N N RESOLUTION NO-1U t ADOPTING THE PBGET SOU ND REGIONAL FIRE ALITHORITY d 2M3-2026 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Q- E Background: 0 1. The Puget Sound Regaoral Fire Authority"Puget Sound Fire"has aetermined, U consistent wfth the State Growth Management Act.that uncoordinated and � t unplanned grawth poses a threat to the hadth,safety,and high quality of life enjoyed by residents of F'uget Sound Fire;and 2, Puget Sound Fire is committed io enSL'ing focllltles and equipment neceSsry to r Support deyetopmant and growth within PS=ore adequate to serve Q development when development occurs Wthoul decreasing currant service 0 levels;and 3. Puget Sound Fire is committed to o"concurreno"philosophy to service delivery: meaning fire and emergency service capacity must grow concurrently vvfth V development:and d. Puget Sound Fire recognbes that as the community continues to grow, C additional resources will be required to adequately meet the growing demand for services,-and i 6. Pug el Sound Fire recoglrzws that to achieve its commitment to concurrency in a O manner consistent with the Slate and Local ordinances that Puget Sound Ffre is required to update the Six Year Copitol Improvement Plan annually. N M NOW THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,that the Governance Board of tha Puget Sound Regfonal Fire Autho&y hereby adapts and appraves the 2023-2028 Capital 4) Improvement Plan,attached he'eta,as an update to the 2014-2033 Puget Sound 0 Regional Fare AuthorifyCapital FacTrties and Equipment Plan. C ADOPTED by the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Governing Board,at an Open public meeting of such Board on the 71h day of September 2D22.the following Board OL Members being present and voting: GOVERNING BOARD d Board Chair Barrie Board vice Choir lhamos N rra�eny xenao- G N Board Member Harto Board Member Boyce M r .� N �auald J[ACLo¢y7} C N Board Membet Saatl Board Member Troutner N A r 'L Y card e e ry toward 3 a L LL 0 Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Governance Board bers City of Covington City of Kent City of Seatac KCFD#37 KCFD#43 0, Advisory Member Advisory Member Advisory Membe Les Thomas Allan Barrie a (Vice-Chair) (Chairperson) Sean Smith Bill Boyce Jake Simpson Margaret Harto Camille Walls E Toni Troutner Jim Scott a 51 ge Puget Sound Fire 2023—2028 Capital Plan Packet Pg. 40 4.E.a Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary............................................................................................................. 7 2 Background and Demographics.................................................................................... 8 2.1 SeaTac Service Area ............................................................................................. 9 a as 2.2 King County Fire District #43 Service Area....................................................... 9 N c 3 Community Growth and Impacts of Growth 2023 -2028 ..................................... 10 3.1.1 Growth Remains Consistent with the 2014-2033 Master CFEP . 12 0. 4 Capital Facilities................................................................................................................. 12 0 4.1.1 Limitations of Deployed Resources to Preserve PPC..................... 12 4.2 Fixed Facilities ........................................................................................................ 13 4.2.1 Fire Stations - Puget Sound RFA Service Area ................................. 13 r a 4.2.2 Support Facilities....................................................................................... 13 -°a 4.2.3 Roadways 72nd Ave South 13 4.2.4 System Capacity...................................................................................... 13 5 Standards of Service......................................................................................................... 16 L 5.1 Time and Origin of Standards............................................................................ 16 0 5.2 Emergency response........................................................................................... 16 N M 5.3 Benchmark / Baseline Gap Performance and Relation to Staffing....... 16 5.4 Components of Response Performance....................................................... 17 c 5.4.1 Alarm Handling Time............................................................................... 17 5.4.2 Turnout Time............................................................................................... 17 0 5.4.3 Drive Time................................................................................................... 17 a 5.4.4 At Patient Side or Water on Fire........................................................... 17 U 5.5 Deployment and Performance Measurement of Response Resources 17 0 N 5.5.1 Distribution.................................................................................................. 17 M N 5.5.2 Distribution / First unit to arrive - Service Capabilities .................... 17 N 5.5.3 Concentration.......................................................................................... 18 >, r 5.6 Benchmark and Baseline Level of Service Objectives............................... 18 0 5.6.1 Community Risk Types ............................................................................ 18 5.6.2 Performance Measured......................................................................... 18 Q a� L 5.6.3 Performance Expectations ................................................................... 18 U- 6 PSF Service Level Performance...................................................................................... 20 0 6.1 Response Performance Findings...................................................................... 20 6.1.1 Availability Measure................................................................................ 20 7 Conclusion of Need for Capital Resources 2023 -2028......................................... 22 0 Planned Capital Funding 2014.................................................................... 22 U) as 7.1.1 - 2033........................................................................................................... 22 a� 7.1.2 Planned Capital Purchases 2023 - 2028............................................ 22 a 7.2 Progress toward Planned Capital Purchases................................................ 29 8 2023- 2028 Capital Plan Effects on Impact Fees..................................................... 30 r r a 6 Page Puget Sound Fire 2023—2028 Capital Plan Packet Pg. 41 4.E.a I Executive Summary a This Capital Improvement Plan ("Plan") is an annual six-year update and extension of the Puget Sound N Regional Fire Authority ("PSF") 2014 - 2033 Master Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan (CFEP) in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act (GMA) Chapter 36.70A a RCW, City of Kent Code 12.15.060, and Covington City Code Chapter 19.50 "Fire Impact Fees". The o funding plan as part of this report has been updated and balanced through 2028. U as r The underlying premise of this document is that as the community continues to grow, additional c r resources will be required to adequately serve the growing demand for fire and life safety services. o The goal of this Plan is to identify the next six years of community growth, determine the need for a additional facilities and equipment, determine their cost, and prioritize those resources into a six-year funding plan (2023 - 2028) to ensure adequate service delivery prior to, or concurrently with the c impacts of development within the service area. This Plan update uses data available through 2022 to 0 evaluate level of service performance and the progress toward implementation of the 2014 - 2033 CFEP. cm M N PSF reviews and considers land use patterns and determinations provided by jurisdictions within Puget c Sound Fire's service area. PSF uses historical growth data provided by the Office of Financial S Management to determine current population estimates and projections to 2028. This approach is o reliable for fire service planning since it looks toward actual growth. However, as data is available from a the Puget Sound Regional Council and updated Comprehensive Plans are provided by the Cities of 00 Kent and Covington, PSF will reevaluate its approach to determine future growth. c N N The greatest recent impact to PSF and the communities it serves is the historic, worldwide COVID-19 N pandemic.As cases of COVID increased within the community, PSF reprioritized its resources and efforts and joined forces with other regional EMS agencies to help ensure a healthy and safe community. .o Emergency personal responded to sick residents and provided COVID testing and vaccinations, while PSF also provided program administration, logistical solutions, and staffing in the regional effort to L overcome the pandemic. Consequently, the cost of goods and materials that PSF depends on for i_ continued use, replacement and expansion has increased due to the pandemic. 0 m The need for resources is best outlined in the capacity analysis in Table 7 which shows daily resource exhaustion occurring several hours of each day in Kent, SeaTac and portions of Covington. The goal is to maintain hourly availability of 90%so response units have a chance of achieving their response time vo) goals 90% of the time. Reference PSF's Mitigation & Level of Service Policy for additional background information regarding PSF's capital needs. a a� E U a 7 Page Puget Sound Fire 2023—2028 Capital Plan Packet Pg. 42 4.E.a 2 Background and Demographics The Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority, also known as Puget Sound Fire (PSF), is an independent special purpose district legally formed under Chapter 52 of the Revised Code of Washington providing a fire and rescue services to nearly 109 square miles of urban and rural area. Services are delivered 24 hours per day, 365 days per year by career firefighters and support staff. Services delivered by PSF include fire suppression, fire prevention and code enforcement, fire investigations, emergency medical services (EMS), non-emergent medical services, hazardous materials response, specialized rescue, a E emergency management, and public education in fire prevention and life safety. U as r PSF's service area includes the cities of Covington, Kent, Maple Valley, and SeaTac, as well as unincorporated areas of King County within Fire Districts 37 and 43. Generally, PSF's service area o borders Renton and Tukwila to the north, the Cascade foothills to the east, Auburn to the south and a Burien, Des Moines and Federal Way to the west. The population of PSF service area is estimated at 245,227. a L For purposes of this plan, capital improvements are defined as real estate, structures or collective equipment purchases anticipated to have a cost of $5,000 or more and an expected useful life of at M least 3 years. a� This update utilizes the service standards adopted by Puget Sound Fire in its 2019 Standard of Cover r (SOC). The SOC is required by the Center for Public Safety Excellence (CPSE) as part of the Accreditation process. These standards are used to identify gaps in service and guide capital resource planning to close identified gaps and sustain and/or improve current services while absorbing the service impacts of new development and community growth. The resources identified in this 6-year co plan work toward implementing the deployment strategies identified in PSF's 2014 - 2033 Master N Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan, 2019 Standard of Cover and 2019 Mitigation and Level of Service o Policy. A r L Diminishing service capacity is the primary service risk identified in this plan'. Fire service capacity is 0 evaluated upon the ability of current deployed resources to meet established levels of service. For Q example, a fire station with three apparatus bays and the infrastructure required to support three or more emergency response units has reserve capacity when only one or two units are staffed and deployed from that station. Additionally, a specific response resource that meets its level of service o objectives and is reliably available for service at least as often as it is expected to meet its level of service objective, has reserve capacity. PSF's goal is to deliver service at adopted levels, nine times out of 10, or a service expectation that meets adopted standards 90% of the time. o U) Fire service capacity is also measured with consideration of future growth and the fire service capacity O that future growth will erode when built. This Plan identifies: a • The current demographics of the PSF E U r 1 See Table 13 Q 8 Page Puget Sound Fire 2023—2028 Capital Plan Packet Pg. 43 4.E.a • The inventory of existing capital resources • The recent historical performance to the adopted standards • The need for additional resources over the next six years • The funding plan to implement the needed resources through 2028. a as 2.1 SeaTac Service Area PSF provides fire-based services to the City of SeaTac through a contract for service that began L January 1, 2014. SeaTac covers approximately 10 square miles surrounding the Port of Seattle Airport and has a 2022 population of 32,543. c0 as r Two fire stations owned by SeaTac are leased and operated by PSF under the service contract. All c other capital resources previously owned by SeaTac prior to 2014 have been transferred to the a ownership of PSF. As a condition of the service contract, SeaTac provides an annual capital payment a to PSF for funding the equipment that was transferred but has retained responsibility for the capital a) costs of fire stations. Consequently, this plan does not address capital fire station needs in the SeaTac service area. L 0 2.2 King County Fire District #43 Service Area N PSF provides fire-based services to King County Fire District #43 (FD43) area through a contract for service that began October 1, 2018. The FD43 area covers approximately 51 square miles. It includes the City of Maple Valley, the areas of Hobart and Ravensdale, as well as a large unincorporated area of rural land. The 2022 population of the FD43 area is 45,227. 0 Six (6) fire stations are owned by FD43. Three stations are currently unstaffed volunteer stations that a U remain part of FD43. The other three stations are operated by PSF under the service contract. Most N other capital resources previously owned by Maple Valley prior to 2018 have been transferred to the N ownership of PSF. As a condition of the service contract, FD43 continues to fund fire stations and o provides an annual capital payment to PSF to assist funding other resource needs. y L 0 Y a L LL 1.I IIO^ V! a c m E z U r r Q 9 Page Puget Sound Fire 2023—2028 Capital Plan Packet Pg. 44 EM 3 Community Growth and Impacts of Growth 2023 - 2028 In the post-Great Recession years from 2010 to 2016, Puget Sound Fire's population grew at its slowest r six-year rate in more than 30 years. Despite the recession, population growth within the legacy (Kent & Fire District 37) service area grew on average 1.43% per year from 2011 to 2021 with Covington experiencing a slightly higher growth rate than Kent.An additional unpopulated area of approximately a 80 acres was annexed into the City of Covington in 2016, now known as the soon-be-developed 214- i acre Lake Point Urban Village on the far east edge of PSF's service area. Alternatively, the unincorporated areas grew by less than a half percent per year (See Table 2). as Over the past five years (2017 - 2021) annual service demand grew across all urban areas except for the rural part of KCFD#43 as shown in Table 1 below. o a Table 1 Five Year Incident Growth c 5-Year Annual Incident Count L Service Area 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 5 Yr. Annual Change Change N Covington 1,580 1,618 1,635 1,644 1,848 17% 3.39% as Kent 17,719 17,844 18,244 1 17,720 19,402 9% 1 .90% c King Co Dist. T 37 507 498 511 516 579 14�0 2.84�o O Maple a Valley 1,559 1,508 1,572 1,561 1,859 19% 3.85% 00 N King Co Dist. N 43 1,239 1,096 1,203 1,281 1,229 -1% -0.16% N SeaTac 4,612 4,658 4,840 4,690 5,452 18% 3.64% N Total 27,216 27,222 28,005 27,412 30,369 127. 2.32% L O a d L_ O O Cn d a c a� E z c� a 10 Page Puget Sound Fire 2023—2028 Capital Plan Packet Pg. 45 4.E.a Housing and Population Projections Service Area 2022 Estimate 2028 Projection Housing Units Population Housing Units Population Covington 7,233 21,248 9,414 23,532 Kent 50,013 139,832 51,082 153,333 King Co Dist. 37 2,173 6,377 2190 6,448 `° a Maple Valley 9,870 29,289 11,452 33,506 0 Unincorporated King Co Dist. 43 6,012 15,938 6,060 16,115 SeaTac 11,997 32,543 12,210 36,000 Total 87,298 245,227 92,408 268,934 0 U a� Table 2 Population and Housing Projections r c r a 0 The Puget Sound Regional Council's plan "Vision 2050," identifies Kent as one of 16 Core Cities. Core a Cities are targeted to accommodate 28% of the regional population growth and 35% of employment growth.2 It is likely that growth rates in Kent will meet or exceed the past 20-year rate of 1.35% per year. c a L "Vision 2050," identifies Covington as one of 42 Cities and Towns. Cities and Towns are targeted to accommodate 6% of the regional population growth and 4% of employment growth.3 M M Table 3 below provides both a low and high range estimate of commercial growth. A growth rate of c 1.35% per year reflects the 20-year rate is the "Low" estimate for 2027 and 2035. The "High" estimate uses a growth rate of 1 .50% per year more closely mirroring market growth rates. The 2019 to 2022 rate o was 1.43%. a U 00 Table 3 Commercial Growth Rates 2019 & 2022 with estimates for 2027 & 2035 N Commercial Growth Projections N Square Feet in Thousands JA 2019 2022 2023 2035 0 Actual Actual Low Estimate High Estimate Low Estimate High Estimate a 61,947,870 62,832,531 63,680,770 63,775,019 74,798,578 77,279,954 ii 0 m c 0 0 U) m 0 a c m E M U z(Puget Sound Regional Council, 2020) r s(Puget Sound Regional Council, 2020) Q 11 Page Puget Sound Fire 2023—2028 Capital Plan Packet Pg. 46 4.E.a 3.1.1 Growth Remains Consistent with the 2014 -2033 Master CFEP The pattern of growth and estimates of future impacts on service demand remain consistent with the 2014 - 2033 Master Capital Facilities & Equipment Plan for the legacy Puget Sound Fire service area. As �a a result of this evaluation, the projected new dwelling units and commercial square footage estimates a are used in calculating impact fees. c as 4 Capital Facilities C. E 0 Capital resources for PSF consist of fire stations, fire apparatus (vehicles used for fire and rescue work), U a' staff vehicles and the related equipment, tools and personal protection equipment needed to provide r fire and rescue services safely and legally. c r a 0 A community's PPC rating depends on: a • Emergency Communications Systems: A review of the fire alarm/91 1 system accounts for 9% of the total classification. The review c focuses on the community's facilities and support for handling and dispatching fire alarms. o • Fire operations & deployment: A review of the fire department accounts for 40% of the total classification. The focus is on a cm fire agency's first-alarm response and initial attack to minimize potential loss. Here, WSRB a� reviews the adequacies of such items as engine companies, ladder or service companies, c n: distribution of fire stations and fire companies, equipment carried on apparatus, pumping capacity, reserve apparatus, department personnel, and training. o • Fire Safety Control: a A review of the community having jurisdiction's (Covington, Kent, King County, SeaTac, Maple U Valley) ability to adopt and enforce effective building codes makes up 16% of the total PPC o N scoring. This is based upon the jurisdiction's practices to adopt codes, train and staff personnel N to enforce these codes, and public awareness programs to their adopted building codes. N Further evaluation looks at the process in place to review plans of new buildings to ensure ;, r structures are code compliant and ongoing inspections of existing buildings for code 0 compliance. ; • Jurisdictional water supply: W L The jurisdiction's water-supply system accounts for 35% of the total classification. WSRB reviews 6- the water supply a community uses to determine the adequacy for fire-suppression purposes. They also consider hydrant size, type, and installation, as well as the inspection frequency and condition of fire hydrants. In rural areas that lack hydrants, a "tender credit" can be applied when the Department maintains the ability to supply an adequate water supply using water tenders. This credit applies in the Fire District 43 rural areas due to their existing water tender v0) infrastructure. 0 a 4.1.1 Limitations of Deployed Resources to Preserve PPC Because the PPC rating criteria that most affects overall rating is the deployment of resources for fire protection, PSF must maintain the fire protection equipment, staffing and deployment that supports its 3 current PPC rating. PSF recognizes the cost savings that could be realized by deploying lighter, a 121Page Puget Sound Fire 2023—2028 Capital Plan Packet Pg. 47 4.E.a cheaper, more maneuverable response vehicles to respond to EMS emergencies. However, such a move would negatively impact PSF's current PPC rating which currently saves the citizens of PSF more than $30 Million in insurance premiums. To deploy both types of vehicles, additional staffing would be required. Currently, PSF does not have the funding to accomplish this type of deployment and will a continue to maintain its firefighting resources first to preserve or improve PPC ratings. c 4.2 Fixed Facilities L Q 4.2.1 Fire Stations - Puget Sound RFA Service Area (excluding contract cities) 0 Emergency services for capital planning purposes, originate from eight fire stations (Stations 71, 72, ) 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, and 78) located throughout the service area (not including Maple Valley or SeaTac) as identified in Table 9 and the map in Figure 1 shown below. The average PSF fire station is over 30 a years old with the capacity for three emergency response apparatus and is 14,675 square feet in size. -°a Individual stations range in size from just under 8,000 to more than 26,000 square feet where training facilities are included. Currently, only stations 71 and 74 maintain more than one front line response apparatus with minimum staffing levels. L O 4.2.2 Support Facilities Support facilities include space and equipment for emergency management functions, fire-training, cm M apparatus & vehicle maintenance, facilities maintenance, planning, information technology, CARES, a� logistics, and a roadway. An inventory of these facilities is found in Table 4 below. c 4.2.3 Roadways - 72nd Ave South An unfinished segment of 72nd Ave South, immediately north of Station 76, was completed on June 28, 2017, as part of a cost saving partnership between PSF and the City of Kent. Puget Sound Fire contributed a total of $1 .2 million to complete the project. As a result of the improved accessibility N and resulting reduced drive times, PSF's performance in the Station 76 response area improved, N M eliminating the need for a future fire station to address long response times. PSF's total contribution to 0 the project was equivalent to less than one year's cost of wages and benefits to staff a new fire station. n 4.2.4 System Capacity 0 System capacity is measured by bay space for response apparatus and firefighter dorm rooms. PSF is Q constantly assessing the response needs of the system. To address changing needs in the community PSF can redeploy assets or add new apparatus and crews (concentration). In some cases, a new U_ station is required to provide bay and dorm space in a strategic location to increase system capacity o and increase or preserve performance (distribution). Capacity directly affects deployment. Units cannot be deployed to address a response need if the nearest station has no dorm or bay capacity. W c 0 Currently, bay space is the main limiting factor. 70% of bay space is occupied by response U) apparatus. Open bays are available in stations with lower call volume growth. Stations in the higher call volume growth areas have no additional bay space. The only solutions to increase capacity are a to remodel existing facilities or build new facilities to provide needed capacity. E U 0 r r a 13 Page Puget Sound Fire 2023—2028 Capital Plan Packet Pg. 48 4.E.a Table 4 Puget Sound Fire, Station & Support Facility Inventory Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Facilities c Facility Address City State Zip C Station 45 3011 South 200th Street SeaTac WA 981 Station 46 3521 South 17th Street SeaTac WA 981 Station 70 407 North Washington Avenue Kent WA 980 L Station 71 504 West Crow Street Kent WA 980 Station 72 25620 140th Avenue SE Kent WA 980 0 Station 73 26512 Military Road South Kent WA 980 a) Station 74 24611 1 16th Avenue SE Kent WA 980 Station 75 15635 SE 272 Street Kent WA 980 a Station 76 20676 72nd Avenue South Kent WA 980 -°a Station 77 20717 132nd Avenue SE Kent WA 980 Station 78 17820 SE 256th Street Covington WA 980 Station 79 Vacant Land 21600 108th Avenue SE Kent WA 980 4 Station 80 23775 SE 264th Street Maple Valley WA 980 oL Station 81 22225 SE 231 st Street Maple Valley WA 980 N Station 82 25509 SE Kent-Kan ley Road Ravensdale WA 980 21 Station 83 27250 216th Avenue SE Maple Valley WA 980 w Station 84 16855 194th Avenue SE Renton WA 980 Station 85 27605 SE 208th Street Maple Valley WA 980 L Station 86 Vacant Land 24600 SE 216th Street Maple Valley WA 980 0 Fire Garage - 76 20678 72nd Avenue South Kent WA 980 a Fire Garage - 81 22225 SE 231 st Street Maple Valley WA 980 0 Facilities Workshop 15635 SE 272 Street Kent WA 980 N Hose Tower- 71 504 West Crow Street Kent WA 980 N Police/Fire Training Center 24523 1 16th Avenue SE Kent WA 980 N JA Drill Tower- 74 24523 1 16th Avenue SE Kent WA 980 r Recruit Classroom 24523 1 16th Avenue SE Kent WA 980 0 Amateur Radio Building 24523 1 16th Avenue SE Kent WA 980 Recruit Academy Instructor Office 24425 1 16th Avenue SE Kent WA 980 Community Risk Reduction 400 West Gowe Street, Suite 414 Kent WA 980 Logistics 8320 South 208th Street, Suite H-1 10 Kent WA 980 2- SKCFTC/KCM1 20811 84th Avenue South, Suite 102 & 106 Kent WA 980 'a, as King County E-91 1 20811 84th Avenue South, Suite 103 & 105 Kent WA 980 SKCFTC Classroom 20811 84th Avenue South, Suite 108 Kent WA 980 PSF/SKCFTC Breakout Room 20811 84th Avenue South, Suite 109 Kent WA 980 rn Finance/EMS 20811 84th Avenue South, Suite 110 Kent WA 980 PSF/SKCFTC Mulfi-Purpose Room 20811 84th Avenue South, Suite Ill Kent WA 980 a B.I.T.S. 20811 84th Avenue South, Suite 112 & 114 Kent WA 980 Wellness Center 20811 84th Avenue South, Suite 116 Kent WA 980 E U a 141Page Puget Sound Fire 2023—2028 Capital Plan Packet Pg. 49 4.E.a Figure 1 PSF Service Area Map c _ a m d N -tsr-avE.s cn (D 01 m > �-Na wt• in mN� ➢�Nm�O, t^ I 3 fD C N^ z ml m tR [ m t WWg7�M CD Oi CDQ. H Av I .t _ m n sup Q N —H+:!�)66TWAVE-S�'FST.yq Q y• 3_�, - raI'rl�";.�-�p—h-w U ILC�I4HNN 5 - C 0 _ A a�W� - m s V o£c z S V,iJte-It. C.VE S man N ��81TH•AVE-S•EAS Lai - o 6 m L' cn sr G ■ N# 1 -tNTH VESE O t ti ti rn n IORTH AVE SE X7 /�" •a O S r 116THAS N a U a to m :y N 140TH•AVESE N = -i `� 968THAVE 5 z - j 0 T • gi ��W �_, Iy 'i /�� O L D3 N6 O N m V` D a mm� �m� ❑ I _ -n N n 00 t! fn m 196TH AVE SE m m w O�1.3 '�'� 1SOls13k , N mom �. y ri ,�^•d� o <" mCAr cp r = O to os x- N w OC y- O o / LL z I a-0yy` q4 E S r 0 x °y.Y ~� Y 276TH-IVE SE, m 292NDrAVE•6 r-% i J-r Q 0 Q w R41 d E V 0 a 15 age Puget Sound Fire 2023—2028 Capital Plan Packet Pg. 50 4.E.a 5 Standards of Service 5.1 Time and Origin of Standards a Time to arrival at the scene of an emergency is critical in the survival of a non-breathing patient and the control of fire growth. The longer it takes trained fire personnel to arrive at the scene of an emergency, the greater the chance of poor outcomes regarding fire and life loss4. As a result, the L standards identified and adopted herein are based upon industry best practices. Industry standards have been established by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and the Center for Public 0 Safety Excellence (CPSE). r 5.2 Emergency response r Achievement of drive time standards are influenced by the location of fire service resources. If a �0 service area is located too far from a fire station (poor distribution), it is unlikely that travel time objectives will be met. If distributed resources are over-used because of high demand, the resource becomes "unreliable" and cannot meet additional demand at adopted levels of service. When units become unreliable, units from farther away must respond in place of the busy home area unit, causing oL increases in arrival times. If too few resources exist, and fire resources from other fire departments are N needed to backfill for busy units, the consequence is extended drive times resulting in increased total response times and higher levels of risk for life and property loss. c 5.3 Benchmark / Baseline Gap Performance and Relation to Staffing L PSF uses adopted Benchmarks to establish level of service goals. Capital facilities and resources are o funded, deployed, and staffed to meet established Benchmarks. Baseline levels of service represent a the actual performance achieved over the previous 5-years. PSF's capital planning goal is to close00 the gap between baseline and benchmark performance. The CPSE reviews PSF's baseline N performance annually to measure progress toward achieving benchmark expectations. Failure to N progressively improve toward benchmark expectations can lead to loss of accredited agency status. N N A r The gap between the benchmark goals and baseline performance should close as funding becomes o available to implement the capital needs identified in the 2014-2033 PSF Master Capital Plan and this Q 2023 - 2028 six-year update of that Plan. Operational funding of additional staff is also required to close the resource gap. Where additional response stations and apparatus are required, PSF must fund the annual operating costs. These costs include staff salaries/benefits, facility operating costs, and o equipment maintenance. c 0 rn m 0 a c m E z U 0 r r a See section 5 and of the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Mitigation and Level of Service Policy for additional detail and consequences of long response times. Q 161Page Puget Sound Fire 2023—2028 Capital Plan Packet Pg. 51 4.E.a 5.4 Components of Response Performance There are three measured components of "Total Response Time" and one currently unmeasured component as described below: a 5.4.1 Alarm Handling Time PSF contracts with Valley Communications Center for alarm handling. Alarm handling is the total time elapsed from the pick-up of a 911 call until enough information is collected to L dispatch appropriate resources. a E 0 5.4.2 Turnout Time 0 as Turnout is the total time it takes firefighters to discontinue their current task, assess dispatch information, don appropriate personal protective gear, and become safely seat-belted in the a response apparatus and ready to begin their response. Turnout time ends when the response -°a vehicle begins to move. a a� 5.4.3 Drive Time Drive time begins when the response vehicle's wheels begin to roll and ends once the response o vehicle arrives at the curbside address of the dispatched incident. When added together, •- alarm handling plus turnout plus drive time equals total response time. cm M 5.4.4 At Patient Side or Water on Fire Currently, the time it takes to move from curbside at the given address to the location of the patient requiring assistance, or the time it takes to setup for firefighting operations until first water is applied to a fire is not tracked. The ability to reliably track this critical time is being developed. a 5.5 Deployment and Performance Measurement of Response Resources N The performance measure directly in PSF's control is the "Dispatch to Arrival Interval" and consists of N "Turnout time+ Drive time". This measure assesses response time performance against two deployment o practices, distribution, and concentration. y 5.5.1 Distribution o Distribution refers to how fire stations and resources are distributed around a service area to achieve first unit arrival levels of service goals. Distribution can be referred to as the "speed of L attack" or the first unit to arrive. Achievements of first unit arrival time objectives indicate that fire stations are properly distributed throughout the service area. 0 5.5.2 Distribution / First unit to arrive - Service Capabilities The first unit arriving at the scene of an emergency staffed with a minimum of 2 firefighters on an Aid Car, or 3 firefighters on an Engine or Ladder. The first arriving unit shall be capable of: establishing command, calling for additional resources, extending appropriate hose line(s), and/or beginning delivery of basic life support and/or rescue services. These operations are a done in accordance with PSF standard operating procedures ensuring the safety of the public and responders. U 0 a 171Page Puget Sound Fire 2023—2028 Capital Plan Packet Pg. 52 4.E.a 5.5.3 Concentration Concentration refers to the number of resources that can be assembled or "concentrated" at the emergency scene. Concentration can be referred to as the "force of attack" or full first �a alarm assignment. Concentration resources need to provide the quantity of resources a necessary to stop the escalation of an emergency. If an agency cannot distribute and concentrate adequate resources, fire and life loss will be higher when compared to the timely arrival of adequate resources. Q. E The full first alarm consists of all the dispatched resources arriving at the scene of an emergency. ci This number can range from 5 personnel for a routine alarm to 28 personnel for a commercial r fire. The full first alarm resources shall be capable of: establishing command, providing an uninterrupted water supply, deploying hose lines for fire control and suppression, complying with c the two-in/two-out law for firefighter rescue, completing forcible entry, ventilating smoke, a controlling utilities, and/or rescuing and treating sick, injured, or at-risk victims. These operations are done in accordance with PSF standard operating procedures while providing for the safety of the public and responders. E 0 5.6 Benchmark and Baseline Level of Service Objectives N M Table and 11 establish the Benchmark service level objectives for Alarm Handling, Firefighter Turnout, Drive Time expectations of distribution (first unit) to arrive. Objectives for additional unit arrival standards 8 c are found in PSF's Standard of Cover Section 6. Benchmark levels of service are targeted for achievement as additional resources identified in this Plan and the Master CFEP are funded, -2 implemented, and staffed. Baseline performance is the level of service PSF is currently capable of a achieving and must be maintained or improved to retain status as an "Accredited Agency" through the Center for Public Safety Excellence. N 0 N 5.6.1 Community Risk Types N a Performance expectations have been established for two community risk types: urban and rural.s y Benchmark and baseline objectives are shown in Table and Table . Urban and rural areas are defined >L by the Urban Growth Boundary established by King County as shown in Figure 1. 0 5.6.2 Performance Measured Q a� L Washington State's Chapter 52.33 RCW requires response performance goals be set relevant to time i� to flashover or brain death. Performance is reported at the 90fh percentile. If response times of 100 incidents were stacked from quickest to slowest, the time of the 90th incident is the time used to •2, measure service delivery at 90%. c 5.6.3 Performance Expectations o The following tables outline the standards for the first arriving unit as adopted by PSF for fire and EMS incidents in the "Urban" and "Rural" service areas by risk level. Urban standards are shown in Table O IL below, and Rural standards are shown in Table below. Full performance standards for all incident types c as E U r r S See section 4.2.1.7 of the 2014-2033 PSF Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan. Q 181Page Puget Sound Fire 2023—2028 Capital Plan Packet Pg. 53 4.E.a and risk categories are found in PSF's 2019 Standard of Cover, Section 6 - "Standards, Goals, and Objectives." Table 5 Benchmark Level of Service Objectives- Urban Areas a • Urban Service Area: a� o Low Risk o Fire Q. Dispatch (1:10) + Turnout (1 :55) + Drive Time (5:35) = 8:40 0 o EMS v as Dispatch (1:30) + Turnout (1:45) + Drive Time (10:15) = 13:30 r c r o Moderate Risk Q- 0 o Fire Q Dispatch (1:10) + Turnout (1 :55) + Drive Time (4:35) = 7:40 o EMS c Dispatch (1:10) + Turnout (1:45) + Drive Time (4:35) = 7:30 =a 0 o High Risk N o Fire Dispatch (1:10) + Turnout (1 :55) + Drive Time (4:35) = 7:40 o EMS Dispatch (1:10) + Turnout (1 :45) + Drive Time (4:35) = 7:30 L 0 Table 6 Benchmark Level of Service Objectives-Rural Service Area a U • Rural Service Area: N 0 N o Low Risk o N o Fire 0 Dispatch (1:10) + Turnout (1 :55) + Drive Time (7:35) = 10:00 r L o EMS 0 Dispatch (1:30) + Turnout (1 :45) + Drive Time (13:15) = 16:30 Q as L o Moderate and High Risk o Fire 0 Dispatch (1:10) + Turnout (1 :55) + Drive Time (6:30) = 9:35 o EMS a: Dispatch (1:10) + Turnout (1 :45) + Drive Time (6:30) = 9:25 0 U) m a c m E z U r r Q 19 Page Puget Sound Fire 2023—2028 Capital Plan Packet Pg. 54 4.E.a 6 PSF Service Level Performance a 6.1 Response Performance Findings Analysis of PSF's historical response data reveals sub-standard performance compared to benchmark L expectations'. Several factors contribute to this current sub-standard performance. First, performance cannot be met during peak hours where workload and unit hour utilization is high and unit availability 0 or reliability to its expected standard is low. Second, some areas of PSF simply cannot be reached r within the adopted time standards because of excess distance from a fire station or increasing traffic c congestion. Finally, latencies in current communications and alerting systems extend firefighter turnout a times beyond benchmark standards. a a� 6.1.1 Availability Measure The fire service refers to this measure as "availability" and is measured through "unit hour utilization" and the reserve availability of specific response units. If an emergency response unit were in its o assigned location 24 hours a day and never called upon for service, it would have a unit hour utilization of 0.00%and reliability of 100%. If an emergency response unit is expected to provide a level of service M performance at 90%, or nine times out of every ten requests, that unit must be "available" to provide service when called upon at least 90% of the time or it will likely fail in its performance expectation. As workload or unit hour utilization increases, availability decreases. L O Availability is typically used as an indicator to monitor the need for additional resources. Availability a at or above 95% is reliable with reserve capacity. This is shown in Table below as "Green." As 00 availability falls below 95% (displayed as yellow) it is time to begin planning for the deployment of N additional resources to handle the increasing workload. availability below 90% (displayed as red) N often prevents reliable achievement of response standards. Those units with availability displayed in N N red have high unit hour utilization and are considered in resource exhaustion. Resource exhaustion begins to impact surrounding fire station response units when they are unavailable to cover the 0 needs of their home area. As neighboring response units are drawn in to cover for areas in resource Q exhaustion, a ripple effect spreads outward with the consequence of longer response times as units must travel out of their home area to cover the deficient area. This ripple continues to spread during u- peak demand hours moving out to other fire stations and often to other jurisdictions. o as c 0 U) m 0 a c m E z U s See PSF's 2019 Standard of Cover,Section 6—Standards,Goals, and Objectives,Tables 35—40 for fire and EMS r performance from 2014-2018 Q 201Page Puget Sound Fire 2023—2028 Capital Plan Packet Pg. 55 4.E.a Table 7 Hourly Unit Availability during 2021 (L m 2021 Station Reliability t SeaTac Kent Covington Maple Valle System Wide 0) L. CL Hour Sta.45 Sta.46 Sta.47 Sta.73 Sta.71 Sta.76 Sta.72 Sta.74 Sta.77 Sta.75 Sta.78 Sta.80 Sta.81 Sta.83 Avg. E Incident Count 2611 1663 1673 2651 6649 1717 1962 5399 2114 1817 1218 1051 1249 1140 O V 00:00 92.74% 92.93% 89.767 91.01% 93.44% 91.44% 91.04% 94.14% 96.59% 95.96% 95.01% 96.21% 92.76% t 01:00 92.01% 95.72% 89.4 92.62% 94.46% 92.11% 88.70 92.62% 93.56% 96.93% 96.907. 93.81% 96.34% 93.12% Im C 02:00 90.17% 93.27% 96.07% 92.33% 93.96% 93.22% 91.41% 92.20% 94.29% 96.87% 97.40% 95.73% 96.89% 93.79% 4' CL O 03:00 92.32% 94.22% 95.18% 91.42% 93.78% 94.85% 96.22% 91.63% 93.85% 95.51% 98.47% 98.27% 95.95% 98.05% 94.98% 'a Q 04:00 92.91% 94.52% 96.07% 91.17% 92.45% 94.41% 95.06% 91.82% 93.87% 97.15% 98.13% 99.00% 96.59% 96.99% 95.01% 0) C� 05:00 91.42% 94.21% 95.28% 89.497. 92.213. 94.727. 94.053. 91.72% 91.647. 96.233. 97.407 96.963. 95.077 96.83% 94.09% R C 06:00 91.74% 93.06% 95.80% 88.21% 92.70% 92.84% 93.06% 90.90% 91.73% 94.92% 96.63% 96.95% 94.59% 95.19% 93.45% :a L 07:00 92.79% 93.92% 94.69% 89.75% 92.13% 92.42% 91.62% 89.34% 89.45% 91.96% 94.19% 95.89% 91.99% 94.18% 92.45% O 08:00 91.98% 92.88% 93.71% 85.75% 90.25% 1 91.14% 90.697. 89.547. 89.74% 92.03% 94.60% 94.52% 92.48% 94.78% 91.72% le N 09:00 91.85% 94.61% 91.08% 87.47% 90.11% 92.60% 90.02% 9% 89.61% 90.14% 90.78% 92.77% 93.16% 92.51% 91.01% M M 10:00 86.93% 93.90% 87.32% 86.90% 88.77 91.62% 88.77% 85.967. 89.077. 88.43 90.88% 93.15% 92.96% 91.84% 89.75% y 11:00 86.02% 93.27% 90.14% 85.52% 87.36% 0 87.84% 84.24% 86.50% 89.70 90.95% 91.57% 92.85% 92.13% .12% 12:00 88.03% 93.06% 90.48% 87.17% 87.99% 90.57% 189.79% 86.47% 86.52% 88.83 91.14% 93.60% 94.34% 93.85% 90.13% is L. 13:00 84.79% 92.12% 85.26% 88.56 91.14% 89.28% 83.84% 88.27% 88.04 92.51% 92.68% 94.56% 92.95% O 14:00 84.79% 92.12% 89.78% 85.26% 88.56i 91.14% 89.28% 83.84% 88.27% 88.04 92.51% 92.68% 94.56% 92.95% 89.56% d 15:00 86.98% 93.18% 90.18% 84.79% 87.44% 90.69% 86.43% 84.43% 87.81% 86.48 90.57% 94.70% 90.69% 88.82% 00 16:00 85.21% 91.58% 90.03% 82.53% 87.52% 89.55% 89.25% 84.41% 87.13% 88.19% 92.52% 90.93% 94.00% 92.20% 88.93% O 17:00 84.38% 92.18% 90.78% 85.227. 87.21% 91.70% 87.71% 82.64% 86.93% 87.11% 92.78% 92.00% 90.88% 92.83% 88.88% M 18:00 86.737. 91.34% 90.30% 84.06% 88.28% 90.92% 88.97% 83.45% 85.19% 85.91% 93.10% 91.88% r-".0171. 92.25% 88.677 N 191.00 86.18% 90.82% 91.08% 84.49% 88.60% 90.77% 88.15% 83.76% 85.06% 87.58% 91.85% 92.49% 88.98% 92.47% 88.73% ) 20:00 85.56% 91.32% 83.33% 87.48% 91.32% 189.67% 82.51% 86.75% 89.20% 94.07% 92.847. 89.347 94.83% 89.15% C 21:00 88.22% 90.29% 91.01% 82.71% 88.06% 91.40% 89.82% 83.76% 87.61% 89.71% 93.07% 93.907 88.717. 93.92% 22:00 L877.28% 91.38% 91.88% 86.37% 88.46% 93.76% 91.25% 88.17% 89.98% 92.22% 95.65% 95.74% 92.68% 95.46% 91.45%23:00 7. 93.77% 93.64% 91.687 93.057. 93.93% 93.17% 92.187 95.14% 94.47% 97.49% 97.19% 93.38% 96.76% 94.047. Daily Av- 92.687, 92.267 92.20% 90.70% 90.99% 94.09% 94.41% 93.14% 94.30% 91.19% M a O B W C 7 O N r� d 7 a c a� E z c� a 21 age Puget Sound Fire 2023-2028 Capital Plan Packet Pg. 56 4.E.a 7 Conclusion of Need for Capital Resources 2023 - 2028 Table 13 identifies the need for additional resource capacity where unit availability is below 90%. Resource exhaustion to PSF's response standards occurs daily in most areas of Kent and some areas of Covington and SeaTac. As growth occurs, future availability is expected to continue its decline for the foreseeable future. This will lead to steadily increasing response times unless strategies for additional resources and the staffing they require can be funded and deployed. Q. 7.1.1 Planned Capital Funding 2014-2033 0 The 2014-2033 PSF Capital Facilities and Equipment Master Plan identified the need for more than $92 million in capital investments to maintain fire service concurrency through 2033. The 2016 six-year plan explored two options to reduce the near-term cost of capital. First, less expensive alternatives to some a resources identified in the Master Plan have been chosen. Next, life cycles of apparatus have been modified providing additional re-sale value to apparatus when they are finished serving PSF. These funds can assist in funding new capital reducing the need for new funding. In total, these changes reduced the cost of some of the resources needed in the next six years. However, escalating construction costs and inflationary increases have outpaced those savings and increased the overall oL capital funding need. N M M The additional cost associated with PSF's portion of funding construction of 72nd Ave South, and the w cost of maintaining the apparatus and equipment transferred from SeaTac and Maple Valley has been c added into the total capital costs established in the Master Plan. Combined with the cost saving -0 measures associated with the new apparatus life cycle plan, the current cost of the total 2014 Master o Plan has increased from $92.4 million to $108.6 million in 2022. The largest portion of this increase comes a U from hard construction costs of needed fire stations. 00 N O N 7.1.2 Planned Capital Purchases 2023-2028 N Table 8 below identifies the capital expenses to be incurred between 2023 and 2028 based upon the N current priorities and levels of service. This table has been updated to reflect current priorities and ;, r level of service needs as an accompaniment to each 6-Year CIP update. Additional supporting o tables follow. a L U_ 1.I IIO^ V! a c m E z U r r Q 22 Page Puget Sound Fire 2023—2028 Capital Plan Packet Pg. 57 4.E.a Table 8 Six Year(2023-2028) Capital Costing c 6 - Year Cost/Funding Sources for Capital Needsup Cost/Funding Source 2023 1 2024 1 2025 1 2026 1 2027 1 2028 Totals d t Expense Sources a Station Construction&Land Purchase $10,450 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,450 c Apparatus $4,189 $2,431 $3,800 $3,380 $2,997 $1,971 $18,768 V Equipment $958 $348 $355 $396 $403 $393 $2,853 s� Asset Preservation $3,004 $1,250 $1,275 $1,046 $586 $498 $7,659 CL I.T.Capital $449 $148 $115 $169 $44 $279 $1,204 -oa 72nd Ave S Extension and Benson Station Debt $120 $120 $0 $0 $0 $0 $240 a m Revenue Sources c Annual Revenue to Capital $6,000 $4,240 $5,544 $5,321 $4,249 $3,404 $28,758 Sale of Surplus Property/Equipment $50 $284 $0 $0 $0 $0 $334 O Covington Impact $1,098 $1,142 $1,187 $1,235 $1,285 $1,000 $6,947 N Kent Impact Fees $2,313 1 $2,346 1 $2,379 $2,414 $2,448 $2,040 $13,940 King County Radio Program $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 v Apparatus Shop Overhead Fees $8 $9 $9 $9 $9 $9 $53 c Summary of revenue less expenses Expense $19,170 $9,297 $5,545 $4,991 $4,030 $3,141 $46,174 Revenue $9,469 $8,021 $9,119 $8,979 $7,991 $6,453 $50,032 d t� Balance -$9,701 -$1,276 $3,574 $3,988 $3,961 $3,312 $3,858 co 0 N M Table 9 Six Year(2023-2028) Facility Construction Costs c N N Facility Construction E 0 Project r2028 72nd Ave E. Extension $120,000 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 a d Station 70 (5800 S. 228 St.) $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 U- Drill Field Conversion (20811 84 Ave S.) $5,450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 c Station 79 (21600 Benson Rd S.) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 .2 Station 75 Move $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 Proposed Riverview Station $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Proposed Covington Station $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 c Cn as a c a� E z c� a 23 Page Puget Sound Fire 2023-2028 Capital Plan Packet Pg. 58 4.E.a Table 10 Six Year(2023-2028) IT Costs IT Capital D- a a� Nutanix EOL upgrades $164,250 $0 $0 $0 $0 $164,25C N Networking Switching $38,325 $38,325 $38,325 $38,325 $38,325 $43,80C ERP Replacement $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $C i Microsoft Licenses $136,875 $0 $71,175 $71,175 $0 $71,175 E Timekeeping replacement $109,500 $109,500 $0 $0 $0 $C c0 Helpdesk replacement $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $C Phone system $0 $0 $5,475 $60,225 $5,475 $C c 0. Table 11 Six Year(2023-2028) Equipment Costs 0 Q m Equipment Description 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 20281 ` * PPE Ensemble/Ballistic Vests- o PSF,SeaTac,MV $428,145 $328,500 $335,070 $300,030 $328,500 $328,50 TIC's- (Bullard-20) (SEEK-20) $154,395 $0 $0 $54,750 $54,750 $44,89 M Defib units (Operations) $312,075 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Fire Hose $19,710 $19,710 $19,710 $19,710 $19,710 $19,71 c Forklift $0 $0 $0 $21,900 $0 $ c AED's (26) $43,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ o Portable/Mobile/Station Radios (740 , units) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ a SCBA Packs/Masks bought in 2018 $0 $0 $0 $219,000 $219,000 $219,00 w Mobile Air Compressor $43,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ o Bauer Compressor 46 $0 $0 $0 $43,800 $0 $ A Bauer Compressor 74 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $43,80 N Bauer Compressor 75 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ !� Bauer Compressor 81 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ L FIT Testing Machines (4) $0 $0 $0 $65,700 $0 $ HURST Tools 30k/apparatus (18) $591,300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Q HazMat $65,700 $62,415 $0 $0 $0 $ m U- c 0 m c 0 Cn m a c a� E z c� a 24 Page Puget Sound Fire 2023-2028 Capital Plan Packet Pg. 59 4.E.a Table 12 Six Year(2023-2028) Apparatus Costs Apparatus co 1999 H &W $ 240,900 $ 240,900 $ 229,950 $ - $ - $ d 2003 Ford F350 XL $ 219,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2007 TRAIL BLAZER (WMD) $ - $ - $ - $ 54,750 $ 54,750 $ N 2006 TOP HAT $ - $ - $ 54,750 $ 54,750 $ - $ c 2011 Ford F350 $ 164,250 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ t 1990 LAWNMOWER TRAILER $ 21,900 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1994 SPIRIT TRAILER $ 21,900 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Q• 1995 Ford F350 XL $ 82,125 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - E O 2014 PIERCE ARROW XT $ - $ 273,750 $ 273,750 $ 273,750 $ 273,750 $ 273,750 V 2016 PIERCE QUANTUM $ 273,750 $ 273,750 $ 273,750 $ 273,750 $ - $ - O 2016 PIERCE QUANTUM $ 273,750 $ 273,750 $ 273,750 $ 273,750 $ - $ 2017 PIERCE Enforcer $ - $ 273,750 $ 273,750 $ 273,750 $ 273,750 $ c 2017 PIERCE Enforcer $ - $ 273,750 $ 273,750 $ 273,750 $ 273,750 $ Q 2016 HAULMARK TRAILER $ - $ - $ - $ 54,750 $ - $ O 2007 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 $ 71,175 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Q 2017 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 54,750 2018 PIERCE Enforcer $ - $ - $ 273,750 $ 273,750 $ 273,750 $ 273,750 2018 PIERCE Enforcer $ - $ - $ 273,750 $ 273,750 $ 273,750 $ 273,750 to 2008 Ford F350 $ 109,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 2007 HAULMARK TRAILER $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 54,750 $ 2007 Ford Expedition $ 54,750 $ - $ $ - $ - $ O 2012 Ford TRANSIT CONNECT XLT $ - $ 54,750 $ $ - $ - $ •• 2005 Genie Scissor Lift $ - $ 54,750 $ 54,750 $ - $ - $ M 2012 Ford F350 $ 54,750 $ 54,750 $ - $ - $ - $ m 2015 Ford K 1 C $ - $ - $ $ 41,063 $ 41,063 $ 2015 Ford E 1 C $ - $ - $ $ 41,063 $ 41,063 $ v 2015 Nissan NV200 $ - $ - $ $ 41,063 $ 41,063 $ 2014 CET FIRE PUMP READY PAC $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ c 2015 Nissan NV200 $ - $ - $ - $ 41,063 $ 41,063 $ 2015 Ford Transit 350 $ - $ - $ - $ 41,063 $ 41,063 $ O 2003 HAULMARK TRAILER $ 54,750 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ d 2008 Ford F250 XL $ 82,125 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ V 2008 Ford F250 XL $ 82,125 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2007 Freightliner BUSINESS CLASS M2 $ - $ - $ - $ 54,750 $ 54,750 $ N 2006 Ford F450 $ - $ - $ - $ 54,750 $ 54,750 $ N 2006 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 $ 54,750 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ M 2000 Ford E450 $ 82,125 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ c 2008 Ford F250 XL $ 82,125 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ N 1995 Ford F250 XL $ 54,750 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1997 Chevrolet ASTRO VAN $ 54,750 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ +r 2018 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 54,750 $ 54,750 `O 2006 Ford Expedition $ 54,750 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 2005 WELLS UTILITY TRAILER $ - $ - $ 32,850 $ - $ - $ Q 1995 FORKLIFT $ - $ - $ 54,750 $ - $ - $ d 2008 Ford Escape $ 54,750 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - LL L 2018 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 54,750 $ 54,750 2008 Ford F350 $ 82,125 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 2016 INTERNATIONAL TERRASTAR $ - $ 109,500 $ 109,500 $ 109,500 $ 109,500 $ 109,500 O_ 2012 Sutphen $ 109,500 $ 109,500 $ 109,500 $ 109,500 $ 109,500 $ - 2016 Freightliner $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 109,500 $ 109,500 1996 INTERNATIONAL WILDFIRE $ 383,250 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 2005 Chevrolet Suburban $ 54,750 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2005 Polaris $ - $ - $ 16,425 $ - $ - $ `O 2005 Iron Eagle $ - $ - $ 16,425 $ - $ - $ +, 2013 INTERNATIONAL TERRASTAR $ 164,250 $ 164,250 $ 219,000 $ - $ - $ d 2013 INTERNATIONAL TERRASTAR $ 164,250 $ 164,250 $ 219,000 $ - $ - $ 3 2016 Freightliner $ - $ 109,500 $ 109,500 $ 109,500 $ 109,500 $ 109,500 0- 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe $ 54,750 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2008 Ford Escape $ 54,750 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2019 PIERCE Enforcer $ - $ - $ 219,000 $ 219,000 $ 219,000 $ 219,000 2019 PIERCE Enforcer $ - $ - $ 219,000 $ 219,000 $ 219,000 $ 219,000 0 2019 PIERCE Enforcer $ - $ - $ 219,000 $ 219,000 $ 219,000 $ 219,000 r 0 $ 438,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Q 25 Page Puget Sound Fire 2023-2028 Capital Plan Packet Pg. 60 4.E.a 0 $ 438,000 $ - $ - $ - $ $ c Table 13 Six Year(2023-2028) Asset Preservation Costing a m Asset Perservation C Description0. O L Station 45 Interior Painting $ $ $ $ 13,140 $ $ Q' E Station 45 Exterior Painting $ $ $ $ 10,950 $ $ U Station 45 Parking Lot Repair&Sealcoating $ $ $ 10,950 $ - $ $ O t Station 46 Interior Painting $ $ $ $ 21,900 $ $ 4' 1M Station 46 Exterior Painting $ $ $ $ 16,425 $ $ C a+ Station 46 Flooring Replacement $ $ $ 27,375 $ - $ $ Q' O Station 46 Parking Lot Repair&Sealcoating $ $ $ $ $ 16,425 $ Q Station 71 Apparatus Bay Door Replacement $ 54,750 $ 54,750 $ $ $ - $ V Station 71 Interior Painting $ $ $ $ 26,280 $ $ C Station 71 Exterior Painting $ $ - $ $ 16,425 $ $ :a L Station 71 Flooring Replacement $ $ 21,900 $ $ - $ $ Q Station 71 HVAC Replacement $ $ - $ 109,500 $ $ $ N Station 71 Parking Lot Repair&Sealcoating $ $ 24,090 $ - $ $ $ `M Station 72 Apparatus Bay Door Replacement $ $ - $ - $ $ 191,625 $ N Station 72 Interior Painting $ $ $ 24,090 $ $ - $ Station 72 Exterior Painting $ $ $ $ $ $ 1 Station 72 Parking Lot Repair&Sealcoating $ $ 21,900 $ $ $ $ Station 73 Apparatus Bay Door Replacement $ $ - $ $ 235,425 $ $ Station 73 Interior Painting $ $ $ 24,090 $ - $ $ d t� Station 73 Exterior Painting $ $ $ - $ 54,750 $ $ pp N Station 73 HVAC Replacement $ 91,980 $ $ $ - $ $ N Station 73 Parking Lot Repair&Sealcoating $ $ $ $ 21,900 $ $ ri N Station 74 Apparatus Bay Door Replacement $ $ $ 229,950 $ - $ $ N Station 74 Interior Painting $ $ $ 24,090 $ - $ $ A Station 74 Exterior Painting $ $ $ - $ 54,750 $ $ Station 74 Flooring Replacement $ $ 21,900 $ $ - $ $ t r Station 74 HVAC Replacement $ $ - $ $ 87,600 $ $ Q Station 74 Parking Lot Repair&Sealcoating $ $ $ $ - $ $ 6( i Station 75 Apparatus Bay Door Replacement $ $ $ 229,950 $ $ $ ILL. Station 75 Interior Painting $ $ $ 24,090 $ $ $ O Station 75 Exterior Painting $ $ $ - $ 54,750 $ $ Station 75 Flooring Replacement $ $ $ 16,425 $ - $ $ Station 76 Apparatus Bay Door Replacement $ $ 219,000 $ - $ - $ $ C Station 76 Interior Painting $ $ - $ $ 24,090 $ $ O Station 76 Exterior Painting $ $ $ - $ - $ $ 5, d Station 76 Flooring Replacement $ $ $ 16,425 $ - $ $ I Station 76 Parking Lot Repair&Sealcoating $ $ $ - $ 27,375 $ $ d Station 77 Interior Painting $ $ $ 21,900 $ - $ - $ C d Station 77 Exterior Painting $ $ $ - $ $ 54,750 $ E t Station 77 Flooring Replacement $ $ $ $ $ - $ 1( Station 77 HVAC Replacement $ $ $ $ $ 109,500 $ Q 26 age Puget Sound Fire 2023-2028 Capital Plan Packet Pg. 61 4.E.a Station 77 Parking Lot Repair&Sealcoating $ $ $ $ 18,615 $ $ Station 77 Decon Washer&Dryer Replacement $ $ - $ 54,750 $ - $ $ Station 78 Interior Painting $ $ 21,900 $ $ $ $ C Station 78 Exterior Painting $ 43,800 $ - $ $ $ $ 2 a Station 78 Flooring Replacement $ - $ 54,750 $ $ $ $ ; Station 78 Parking Lot Repair&Sealcoating $ $ - $ $ 16,425 $ $ Station 80 Interior Painting $ $ 21,900 $ $ - $ $ N M Station 80 Exterior Painting $ $ $ 38,325 $ $ $ Q. Station 80 Flooring Replacement $ 16,425 $ 8,760 $ - $ $ $ E O Station 80 Parking Lot Repair&Sealcoating $ 10,950 $ - $ $ $ $ (� Station 81 Apparatus Bay Door Replacement (2063) $ 131,400 $ $ $ $ $ Station 81 Interior Painting $ - $ - $ 24,090 $ $ $ IM C Station 81 Exterior Painting $ $ 54,750 $ $ $ $ a CL Station 81 Flooring Replacement $ $ 21,900 $ $ $ $ O Station 81 HVAC Replacement $ $ - $ $ $ $ 16• Q d Station 81 Parking Lot Repair&Sealcoating $ 125,925 $ $ $ $ $ Station 81 Roof Replacement $ - $ $ $ $ 164,250 $ C Station 81 Decon Washer&Dryer Replacement $ $ $ $ 54,750 $ $ Station 82 Apparatus Bay Door Replacement $ $ $ 43,800 $ - $ $ Station 82 Interior Painting $ $ 21,900 $ $ $ $ N M Station 82 Exterior Painting $ 16,425 $ - $ $ $ $ M Station 82 Flooring Replacement $ 8,760 $ $ $ $ $ N V Station 82 Parking Lot Repair&Sealcoating $ - $ $ $ 27,375 $ $ M Station 82 Bay Floor Repair $ 21,900 $ $ $ - $ $ C Station 83 Apparatus Bay Door Replacement $ 43,800 $ $ $ $ $ 0 Station 83 Interior Painting $ - $ 21,900 $ $ $ $ d Station 83 Exterior Painting $ - $ 16,425 $ $ $ $ () Station 83 Flooring Replacement $ 32,850 $ - $ $ $ $ O N O Station 83 HVAC Replacement $ - $ $ $ 16,425 $ $ N Station 83 Parking Lot Repair&Sealcoating $ 8,760 $ $ $ - $ $ N O Station 83 Roof Replacement $ - $ 43,800 $ $ $ $ N to Station 84 Interior Painting $ 16,425 $ $ $ $ $ Station 84 Exterior Painting $ 16,425 $ $ $ $ $ C Station 84 Flooring Replacement $ 16,425 $ $ $ $ $ Station 84 HVAC Replacement $ - $ $ $ 54,750 $ $ Q d Station 84 Parking Lot Repair&Sealcoating $ 10,950 $ $ $ - $ $ i ILL. Station 85 Interior Painting $ 21,900 $ $ $ $ $ Station 85 Exterior Painting $ 43,800 $ $ $ $ $ 0 O Station 85 Flooring Replacement $ 10,950 $ $ $ $ $ Station 85 Parking Lot Repair&Sealcoating $ 16,425 $ $ $ $ $ Station 85 Parking Lot Drain Repair $ 10,950 $ $ $ $ $ C 7 Fire Garage-76 Interior Painting $ - $ 32,850 $ $ $ $ O N Fire Garage-76 Exterior Painting $ $ - $ $ $ $ 5, +' d 1M Fire Garage-76 Flooring Replacement $ $ $ $ $ 27,375 $ 7 a Fire Garage-76 Parking Lot Repair&Sealcoating $ $ $ - $ 27,375 $ - $ r Fire Garage-81 Apparatus Bay Door Replacement $ $ $ 32,850 $ - $ $ y Fire Garage-81 Interior Painting $ $ 21,900 $ - $ $ $ t) Fire Garage-81 Exterior Painting $ $ - $ $ $ $ 2; M r Fire Garage-81 Flooring Replacement $ $ - $ $ $ 5,475 $ Q 27 age Puget Sound Fire 2023-2028 Capital Plan Packet Pg. 62 4.E.a Fire Garage-81 Air Compressor Replacement $ 6,570 $ $ $ $ $ Recruit Classroom Interior Painting $ - $ 5,475 $ $ $ $ Recruit Classroom Exterior Painting $ $ 9,855 $ $ $ $ Recruit Classroom Flooring Replacement $ $ - $ $ $ 16,425 $ a Recruit Classroom HVAC Replacement $ $ - $ $ $ - $ 2 Recruit Academy Instructor Office Interior Painting $ $ 10,950 $ $ $ $ Recruit Academy Instructor Office Exterior Painting $ $ 20,805 $ $ $ $ N t Recruit Academy Instructor Office Roof Replacement $ 43,800 $ $ $ $ $ i sZ Logistics Interior Painting $ - $ 27,375 $ $ $ $ E O SKCFTC/KCMI Office Space Interior Painting $ $ 43,800 $ $ $ $ (� Finance&Conference Rooms Interior Painting $ $ - $ $ $ $ 4: 4) BITS Office Space Interior Painting $ $ $ $ $ $ 4: tM C Engine 345 Extrication Tool $ 32,850 $ $ $ $ $ a CIL Ladder 346 Extrication Tool $ 32,850 $ $ $ $ $ O Engine 347 Extrication Tool $ 32,850 $ $ $ $ $ Q d Engine 371 Extrication Tool $ 32,850 $ $ $ $ $ Engine 471 Extrication Tool $ 32,850 $ $ $ $ $ Engine 372 Extrication Tool $ - $ 32,850 $ $ $ $ Engine 373 Extrication Tool $ $ 32,850 $ $ $ $ Ladder 374 Extrication Tool $ $ 32,850 $ $ $ $ N M Engine 374 Extrication Tool $ $ 32,850 $ $ $ $ M Engine 375 Extrication Tool $ $ - $ 32,850 $ $ $ G1 V Engine 376 Extrication Tool $ $ $ 32,850 $ $ $ M Engine 377 Extrication Tool $ $ $ 32,850 $ $ $ C 16- Engine 378 Extrication Tool $ $ $ 32,850 $ - $ $ 0 Engine 380 Extrication Tool $ $ $ - $ 32,850 $ $ d Engine 381 Extrication Tool $ $ $ $ 32,850 $ $ O Engine 383 Extrication Tool $ $ $ $ 32,850 $ $ O N O Rescue 7 Extrication Tool $ $ $ $ 32,850 $ $ N Extracation Tool Spares $ - $ $ $ 32,850 $ $ N O PSF Space-Recruit Academy Training Area $ 328,500 $ $ $ - $ $ N to PSF Office Space Tenant Improvement $ 219,000 $ $ $ $ $ SKCFTC/KCM1/KCEMS Joint Training Area $ 219,000 $ $ $ $ $ C t Logistics Office Space Tenant Improvement $ 219,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ ++ Station 46 Exhaust Extraction System Buildout $ - $ $ 54,750 $ $ $ Q d Station 80 Exhaust Extraction System Buildout $ 43,800 $ 21,900 $ - $ $ $ i ILL. Station 81 Exhaust Extraction System Buildout $ 43,800 $ - $ $ $ $ Station 82 Exhaust Extraction System Buildout $ - $ 21,900 $ $ $ $ 0 O Station 83 Exhaust Extraction System Buildout $ 10,950 $ - $ $ $ $ 4) Station 84 Exhaust Extraction System Buildout $ - $ 21,900 $ $ $ $ Station 85 Exhaust Extraction System Buildout $ $ 21,900 $ $ $ $ 7 Station 45 Card Access System Installation $ $ 27,375 $ $ $ $ O N Station 46 Card Access System Installation $ $ 43,800 $ $ $ $ 13) d Station 71 Card Access System Installation $ 27,375 $ - $ $ $ $ d Station 72 Card Access System Installation $ 21,900 $ $ $ $ $ r Station 73 Card Access System Installation $ 32,850 $ $ $ $ $ d Station 74 Card Access System Installation $ 32,850 $ $ $ $ $ t� Station 75 Card Access System Installation $ 32,850 $ $ $ $ $ r Station 76 Card Access System Installation $ 32,850 $ $ $ $ $ Q 28 age Puget Sound Fire 2023-2028 Capital Plan Packet Pg. 63 4.E.a Station 77 Card Access System Installation $ 32,850 $ $ $ $ $ Station 78 Card Access System Installation $ 32,850 $ $ $ $ $ Station 80 Card Access System Installation $ 27,375 $ $ $ $ $ Station 81 Card Access System Installation $ 27,375 $ $ $ $ $ t4 d Station 82 Card Access System Installation $ 21,900 $ $ $ $ $ Station 83 Card Access System Installation $ 21,900 $ $ $ $ $ N C Station 84 Card Access System Installation $ 21,900 $ $ $ $ $ N t Station 85 Card Access System Installation $ 21,900 $ $ $ $ $ Q Logistics Card Access System Installation $ 27,375 $ $ $ $ $ E O Fire Garage-76 Card Access System Installation $ 32,850 $ $ $ $ $ () Fire Garage-81 Card Access System Installation $ 16,425 $ $ $ $ $ r Station 72 GearGrid Installation $ 10,950 $ $ $ $ $ C Station 80 GearGrid Installation $ 9,855 $ $ $ $ $ Q Station 81 GearGrid Installation $ 9,855 $ $ $ $ $ O Station 82 GearGrid Installation $ 5,475 $ $ $ $ $ Q d Station 84 GearGrid Installation $ 5,475 $ $ $ $ $ Station 85 GearGrid Installation $ 5,475 $ $ $ $ $ Station 72 Security Fence and Gate $ - $ 54,750 $ 54,750 $ $ $ 'a Station 45 Fuel Dispensing/Tracking System $ - $ 26,280 $ 26,280 $ $ $ Station 71 Fuel Dispensing/Tracking System $ 27,375 $ $ $ $ $ N M Station 72 Fuel Dispensing/Tracking System $ 27,375 $ $ $ $ $ M Station 73 Fuel Dispensing/Tracking System $ 27,375 $ $ $ $ $ y v Station 74 Fuel Dispensing/Tracking System $ 27,375 $ $ $ $ $ Station 80 Fuel Dispensing/Tracking System $ - $ 27,375 $ 27,375 $ $ $ Station 81 Fuel Dispensing/Tracking System $ - $ 27,375 $ 27,375 $ $ $ 0 Station 80 Kitchen Countertop Replacment $ 6,570 $ - $ - $ $ $ d Station 80 Sound Wall/Window Upgrades $ 14,235 $ $ $ $ $ () Station 77 Kitchen Countertop Replacment $ 14,235 $ $ $ $ $ N O Station 81 Concrete Aprons $ 87,600 $ $ $ $ $ N Station 81 Kitchen Countertop Replacment $ 10,950 $ $ $ $ $ N O Station 81 Security Fence and Gate $ 43,800 $ $ $ $ $ N to Station 81 Carport $ 21,900 $ $ $ $ $ r Station 81 Air Compressor Installation $ 6,570 $ $ $ $ $ L O Station 81 Concrete Aprons $ 32,850 $ $ $ $ $ Station 83 Kitchen Countertop Replacment $ 6,570 $ $ $ $ $ Q N Station 83 Security Fence and Gate $ 27,375 $ $ $ $ $ = ILL Station 84 Concrete Aprons $ 32,850 $ $ $ $ $ Station 84 Kitchen Countertop Replacment $ 6,570 $ $ $ $ $ 0 O d C 7 7.2 Progress toward Planned Capital Purchases Un PSF's unprecedented response to, and the lingering financial and social impacts of the COVID-19 crisis & have delayed some planned equipment purchases between 2019 and 2022. In 2022 PSF entered the a design phase for Station 70 in the Kent Valley. Construction cost estimates came back at approximately $20 million. This prompted a search for alternatives. PSF is in the process of acquiring E and upgrading an existing structure. This location provides better distribution and will save o r approximately $10 million. Station 70 is scheduled for completion in late 2025 or early 2026. The land a 291Page Puget Sound Fire 2023-2028 Capital Plan Packet Pg. 64 4.E.a acquisition for the Benson station has been paid off. The Benson Station 79 timeline is on hold until construction costs stabilize. Developing an additional Drill Field to support training needs has been planned for an area adjacent to the 84'" Avenue Business Center. This location will support recruit academy and other training. All asset preservation projects, equipment needs, and apparatus a replacements are funded throughout the life of this plan. The 2014- 2033 Master Capital Plan is funded through 2033 with the following assumptions: • Annual tax revenue to capital between 2020- 2033 averages $3.9 million per year • Impact fee revenue between 2020-2033 averages $1 .8 million per year E 0 U a� 8 2023 - 2028 Capital Plan Effects on Impact Fees r Impact fees are established in the PSF Mitigation and Level of Service Policy in Appendix A, using a o formula based upon the cost of capital needs and service demand by property type. This policy as a well as the annual capital plan cost estimates require annual updates. Total funding needs have c increased in this update resulting in an increase in some impact fees displayed in Table below. a L Table 13 2023 Impact Fees N M M Impact Fee Formula Calculation W Residential/ New Projected New r_ System wide Usage ERF ca ca Land Use Type C&E Commercial Factor Factor Dev Units 2014 - Impact Fee a Split Share 2035 Residential a Single-Family 62% 1.08 $2,377.75 PE U $108,673,000 58% 80% 14,200 Units Multi-Family 38% 1.4 $1,889.13 Ur N 0 Commercial N M Commercial/Industrial 33% 2 85% $2.08 N Hospital/Medical Clinic/ w 26% 2 95% $1.83 PE r Civic/School/Church $108,673,000 42% 12,312,100 SF Senior Living/Assisted Care 21% 3 95% $2.22 Sq t Service- Hotel/Restaurant/Etc. 20% 2 95% $1.41 Q a� L U_ 0 1.I 1I0^ V! a c m E z U 0 r r Q 30 Page Puget Sound Fire 2023—2028 Capital Plan Packet Pg. 65 4.F ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Kurt Hanson, AICP, EDFP 220 Fourth Avenue South KENT Kent, WA 98032 WASHINGTON 253-856-5454 DATE: November 1, 2022 TO: Operations and Public Safety Committee SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Amendment — Kent, Auburn, and Federal Way School Districts' 2023-2028 Capital Facilities Plans — Ordinance - Adopt MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4447, amending the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan by adopting the Kent, Auburn, and Federal Way School Districts' 2023-2028 Capital Facilities Plans. SUMMARY: The Kent City Code provides for imposition of school impact fees on behalf of any school district which provides to the City annual updates of their capital facilities plan; the plans are adopted by reference as part of the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan. This ordinance is the yearly incorporation of the Kent, Auburn, and Federal Way School Districts' Capital Facilities Plans into the Kent Comprehensive Plan Capital Facilities Element. The City Council held a public hearing on this item on October 18, 2022. BUDGET IMPACT: As described. SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Innovative Government - Delivering outstanding customer service, developing leaders, and fostering innovation. Thriving City - Creating safe neighborhoods, healthy people, vibrant commercial districts, and inviting parks and recreation. Sustainable Services - Providing quality services through responsible financial management, economic growth, and partnerships. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Comp Plan Amendment - Kent, Auburn and Federal Way School Districts' 2023-2028 CFP - Ordinance (PDF) Packet Pg. 66 4.F.a a� c :r Q. 0 Q m c 0 c L ORDINANCE NO. 4447 N M M N AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the c 0 City of Kent, Washington, amending the Kent Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities o Element to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the a Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts U- (CPZ-2022-1). 00 N O N M N O RECITALS v, r U L Y A. The City of Kent has adopted a school impact fee program as o authorized by the State Growth Management Act (GMA) and RCW 0 82.02.050. Impact fees may be collected and spent only for the public facilities which are addressed by the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the City's comprehensive plan. In order to collect school impact fees to be spent by the school districts, the City must adopt the schools' Capital Facilities U- Plans into the City's Capital Facilities Plan Element. a c L B. The State of Washington Growth Management Act (GMA) a requires internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements and the Y plans from other jurisdictions. To assure that comprehensive plans remain c relevant and up to date, the GMA allows amendments to the capital facilities element of comprehensive plans concurrently with the adoption or E amendment of a city budget. RCW 36.70A.130(2)(a)(iv). Q 0 a. C. The City of Kent has established procedures for amending the E Comprehensive Plan in Chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code (KCC), allowing L) 1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2021-2022 - 2026-2027 School E Dist. School District Capital Facilities Plans U 0 r Q Packet Pg. 67 4.F.a c amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan a 0 concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the City budget and Q a� allowing the City Council to hold the public hearing instead of the Land Use and Planning Board, as laid out in KCC 12.02.010. 0 D. The Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts have N M submitted proposed amendments to their Capital Facilities Plans to be a� included in an amendment of the City's Capital Facilities Element of the c Comprehensive Plan. 0 E. After providing appropriate public notice, the City Council of U- the City of Kent considered the requested Comprehensive Plan amendment o N and held a public hearing on the same on October 18, 2022. M Co04 N F. On September 15, 2022, the City provided the required 60 day L notification under RCW 36.70A.106 to the State of Washington of the City's N 0 proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive 6 Plan. The 60 day notice period has passed, and by operation of law, it is n deemed approved. L G. On November 15, 2022, the City Council of the City of Kent approved the Capital Facilities Element amendment CPZ-2022-1 to include c the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School L Districts, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached and incorporated by this � a reference. c a� Y NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, a� WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: E c a� E Q c a a E 0 U 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2021-2022 - 2026-2027 School E Dist. School District Capital Facilities Plans r Q Packet Pg. 68 4.F.a a� c ORDINANCE a 0 SECTION 1. - Amendment. The Kent Comprehensive Plan, and its Q as Capital Facilities Element, are amended to include the Capital Facilities Plans c of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit 0 "A" attached and incorporated by this reference (CPZ-2022-1). N M M SECTION 2. - Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon 0 approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are L authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the 0 correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering; or U- references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations. o N O SECTION 3. - Severability. If any one or more section, subsection, N N r or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, that i decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance o and the same shall remain in full force and effect. 00 SECTION 4. - Effective Date. This ordinance will take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law. a� U- c �a c L November 15, 2022 DANA RALPH, MAYOR Date Approved Q a� Y ATTEST: r c as E c November 15, 2022 KIMBERLEY A. KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted Q c 0 November 18, 2022 a. 0. Date Published E 0 U 3 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2021-2022 - 2026-2027 School E Dist. School District Capital Facilities Plans U 0 r Q Packet Pg. 69 4.F.a c w Q. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Q a� c c TAMMY WHITE, CITY ATTORNEY 0 N M M V C fC C L 0 U- U 00 N O N M N Co N y r V �L 0 0 V U) L Q� U- R L a Y c a� c d E Q r- M d om E 0 U 4 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2021-2022 - 2026-2027 School E Dist. School District Capital Facilities Plans r Q Packet Pg. 70 4.F.a 4' KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT EQUITY EXCELLENCE , COMMUNITY a L O Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan M M 2021-2022 through 2027-2028 L June 2022 0 a U_ U Kent School District No. 415 N 12033 SE 2561h Street N Kent, Washington 98030-6643 N 0 (253) 373-7526 N N r V L Y N BOARD of DIRECTORS °o Ms. Leslie Hamada, President to Mr. Joe Bento, Vice President � Mr. Awale Farah, Legislative Representativecc Ms. Michele Bettinger, Director Mr. Tim Clark, Director c ca c L ADMINISTRATION a a� Israel Vela Y Superintendent of Schools E Dr. Wade Barringer, Senior Executive Director Strategic Initiatives & Operations E Dave Bussard, Executive Director Operations & Facilities Q Sara Dumlao, Interim Assistant Director of Procurement a a E 0 U c m E t U r Q Packet Pg. 71 4.F.a a� c :r Q. Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan L O Table of Contents N M M - Executive Summary...................................................................................................1 c c II -Six-Year Enrollment Projection...............................................................................3 =a 0 III - Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" .................................................7 a Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students.................................................. 7 v 00 Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students 8 N N M N IV- Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools 9 CN c N r V �L V-Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan................................................................14 w 0 6 VI - Portable Classrooms.............................................................................................19 VII - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity 20 f° cc L w VIII Finance Plan 26 U_ c IX -Summary of Changes to June 2021 Capital Facilities Plan......................................36 f° c L X-Appendices............................................................................................................37 a as Y c a� c a� E Q c a. 0. E 0 U c m E M U 0 r Q Packet Pg. 72 4.F.a a� c - Executive Summary o a This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan has been prepared by the Kent School District as the organization's capital facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual Plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2022 for the 2022-2023 school year. N This annual update of the Plan reflects no new major capital projects, a zero-dollar impact fee rate due to declining enrollment and new capacity study. c c This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all the district's needs. 0 The district may prepare interim and periodic Long-Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent a with Board Policies, considering a longer or shorter period, other factors and trends in the use U 00 of facilities, and other needs of the district as may be required. o N N Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan N King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, and Renton and included in the r Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. This Plan has also been submitted to the cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac for their o information and inclusion in their Comprehensive Plans. o 0 In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, U) the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee-implementing ordinance f° for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District,the L cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. ii c �a This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current and i future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity,those guidelines do not account for local program needs in the a District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize a� the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for Y students of the District. as E This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Program capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs Q served in each building. Portables in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. a a E 0 U c m E t U r Q Packet Pg. 73 4.F.a a� c The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District's standard of . service and the existing inventory of permanent facilities. The District's program capacity a of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the state's mandated reduction of class size to meet the standard of service for Kent School District. Portables provide additional interim capacity. O Kent School District is the fifth largest (FTE basis) district in the state. Enrollment is N electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction ("OSPI")on Form P-223.Although funding apportionment is based on Annual Average Full Time Equivalent (AAFTE), enrollment on October 1 is a widely recognized "snapshot in time"that is used to report the District's enrollment for the year as reported to OSPI. L O The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of interim facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The District plans to continue U to satisfy concurrency requirements through the interim use of portables. o N This Plan currently represents projects in process funded primarily bythe Kent School District's N 2016 Bond, as well as the 2018 Capital Construction Levy. Additional information about these r projects can be found on the district's capital projects homepage (link . Additionally, project updates sent to our community of stakeholders can be accessed on the KSD website link . 0 0 Based on revised student generation rates, and district enrollment projects, the district has updated the proposed student impact fee rate for the coming year. For a short overview, see Section IX (Summary of Changes to the June 2021 Capital Facilities Plan). L U- L Q Y c a� c a� E Q c d 0. E 0 U c m E t U 0 r Q Packet Pg. 74 4.F.a II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, enrollment growth projections are based on cohort survival and a student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years (See a Table 2). For this Plan, the district relied substantially on the results from Dr. Les Kendrick's study of long-range enrollment forecasts for the Kent School District in the Winter of 2021. c c �a King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine p the number of kindergartners entering the system (See Table 1). 8.26% of 25,273 King County live births in 2017 is projected for 2,087 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, M 2022. This is a decrease of 738 live births in King County over the previous year (See Table 2). c Early Childhood Education students (also identified as "ECE"), "Early Childhood Special Education ("ECSE") students are forecast and reported to OSPI separately on Form P-223H for 0 Special Education Enrollment. Capacity is reserved to serve students in the ECE programs at a elementary schools. v 00 N In addition to live birth data, enrollment projections for October 1, 2022 going forward rely N upon the results of the enrollment study by Dr. Kendrick, utilizing the "medium growth" N methodology. N N r V L Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The District w will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all 0 jurisdictions will be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. The Kent School District serves eight permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County,the cc cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, and Auburn and smaller portions of the cities of SeaTac, Black Diamond, and Maple Valley. c �a c L Q Y c a� c a� E Q c d 0. E 0 U c m E t U 0 r Q 3 Packet Pg. 75 4.F.a a� c STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR a 0 "Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last ten years. p m Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School District is as follows: M as c 0 Single Family Elementary .270 Middle School .105 0 Senior High .075 a Total .450 v 00 N O N Multi-Family Elementary .082 N Middle School .035 `" N Senior High .029 U Total .146 w 0 6 0 The student generation factor is based on 2,967 SFD (Single Family Detached) units built between 2012 and 2022. There are 801 K-6 students geocoded to those homes. Therefore, the SFD student yield for students in grades K thru 6 is 0.270, translating to 0.27 student for every new SFD unit built or 27 students for every 100. Apartments and Condos were calculated independently, then combined for the Multi-Family attached student yields. U_ In preparing the 2021-2022 to 2026-2027 Capital Facilities Plan the District contracted with Davis Demographics, a noted expert in demographic studies for school districts, to analyze and prepare the 3 student generation factor. EDC included both "garden" and "urban style" apartments in the calculation a for multi-family residences. a� Y Within the district's borders there are several income-based and multi-family housing projects coming on-line in 2022/2023. Once developed with occupancy occurring the District does recognize that the student generation for multi-family housing may impact future Capital Facilities Plan updates. Q c 0 a a E 0 U c m E t U r Q 4 Packet Pg. 76 4.F.a KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 OCTOBER REPORT 1251 H (HEADCOUNT) ENROLLMENT HISTORY Im C W 0. 0 Q For 2022 UP - Headcount Enrollment History LB=Live Births LB in 2008 LB in 2009 LB in 2010 LB in 2011 LB in 2012 LB in 2013 LB in 2014 LB in 2015 LB in 2016 O October HC Enrollment 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 w King County Live Births' 25,222 25,057 24,514 24,630 25,032 24,910 25,348 25,487 26,011 M Increase/Decrease 323 -165 -543 116 402 280 316 139 524 Kindergarten/Birth%' 8.40% 8.34% 8.34% 8.17% 8.14% 7.98% 7.93% 6.68% 7.06% V C Kinder arten 2,119 2,090 2,045 2,013 2,037 1,989 2,010 1,703 1,836 Grade 1 2,186 2,127 2,131 2,067 2,056 2,061 2,036 1,882 1,768 L Grade 2 2,055 2,190 2,163 2,163 2,077 2,008 2,091 1,980 1,817 O Grade 3 1,922 2,070 2,176 2,195 2,143 2,043 1,995 2,001 1,938 a Grade 4 2,087 1,956 2,089 2,195 2,218 2,118 2,038 1,912 1,924 LL V Grade 5 2,008 2,116 1,958 2,103 2,189 2,169 2,120 1,937 1,872 N Grade 6 2,079 2,023 2,058 1,952 2,120 2,184 2,164 2,024 1,894 c N Grade 7 Middle School 2,046 2,104 1,974 2,021 1,922 2,044 2,166 2,010 1,925 N Grade 8 2,121 2,091 2,100 2,021 2,043 1,882 2,073 2,086 1,937 N Grade 9 Senior High 2,483 2,428 2,093 2,105 2,006 2,004 1,888 2,006 2,042 in Grade 10 " 2,046 2,151 2,165 2,099 2,080 1,946 2,035 1,813 1,959 2 �L Grade 11 " 1,873 1,802 1,818 1,865 1,823 1,732 1,663 1,744 1,583 y_ Grade 12 " 1,539 1,576 1,742 1,730 1,810 1,654 1,634 1,484 1,655 8 Total Enrollment z 26,564 26,724 26,512 26,529 26,524 25,834 25,913 24,582 24,150 0 z v Yearly Headcount N Increase/Decrease -48 160 -212 17 -5 -690 79 -1,331 -432 Cumulative Increase -267 -107 -319 -302 -307 -997 -918 -2,249 -2,681 Change to Full Day Kindergarten for all schools 1 This number indicates actual births in King County 5 years prior to enrollment year as updated by Washington State Department of 4) LL Health,Center for Health Statistics.Kent School District percentage based on actual Kindergarten enrollment 5 years later. z Enrollment reported to OSPI on Form P-223 generates basic education funding and excludes Early Childhood Special Education "ECSE"&"132"or Birth to 2 Preschool Inclusive Education and excludes College-only Running Start students. C L 3 3 Q C N Y c c E a a a E 0 U c d E t c� co Q Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 1 May 2022 5 Packet Pg. 77 4.F.a KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX - YEAR ENROLLMENT PROJECTION a 0 Q 2021 - 2027 Enrollment Projections Full Day Kindergarten at all Elem LB in 2016 LB in 2017 LB in 2018 1 LB in 2019 1 LB in 2020 Est LB in 2021 Est.LB in 2022 C ACTUAL1.2 ENROLLMENT PROJECTED ENROLLMENT O October 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 M King County Live Births 26,011 25,273 24,337 24,090 24,031 24,344 24,669 Increase/Decrease 524 -738 -936 -247 -59 313 325 a) c� Kindergarten/Birth % 7.06% 8.26% 8.19% 8.22% 8.23% 8.13% 8.13% FD Kindergarten 1,836 2,087 1,993 1,979 1,978 1,980 2,006 c Grade 1 1,768 2,096 2,143 2,041 2,027 2,024 2,026 0 Grade 2 1,817 2,079 2,103 2,146 2,044 2,028 2,025 r Grade 3 1,938 2,008 2,088 2,107 2,150 2,046 2,030 LLLL Grade 4 1,924 2,003 2,020 2,096 2,115 2,156 2,052 U o Grade 5 1,872 2,033 2,000 2,013 2,089 2,106 2,146 N 0 Grade 6 1,894 1,964 2,060 2,021 2,035 2,109 2,126 N Grade 7 Middle School 1,925 2,007 1,976 2,068 2,029 2,041 2,115 c Grade 8 1,937 2,072 2,032 1,997 2,090 2,049 2,060 N Grade 9 Senior High 2,042 2,274 2,263 2,216 2,178 2,276 2,232 +y, Grade 10 " 1,959 2,138 2,116 2,102 2,058 2,021 2,112 Grade 11 " 1,583 1,669 1,859 1,836 1,824 1,784 1,751 y Grade 12 " 1,655 1,320 1,465 1,628 1,608 1,596 1,561 Total Enrollment Projection 24,150 25,750 26,118 26,250 26,225 26,216 26,242 0 z v Yearly Increase/Decrease 432 1,600 368 132 -25 -9 26 Yearly Increase/Decrease% -1.76% 6.63% 1.43% 0.51% -0.10% -0.03% 0.10% Total Enrollment Projection* 24,150 25,750 26,118 26,250 26,225 26,216 26,242 2 d *Does not include iGrad,RS LL Live births for King County are estimates for year 2021 &2022 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study 2021 "Medium Growth Model" c L 3 3 Q d Y c c E a to a a E 0 U c d E t c� co Q Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 May 2022 6 Packet Pg. 78 4.F.a III - Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County Code a 21A.06.1225 references a "standard of service"that each school district must establish in order -°a to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the district which would best serve the student population. L 0 This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as "impact" schools and the M standard of service targets a lower-class size at those facilities. Portables included in the as capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanentfacilities. c The standard of service defined herein will continue to evolve in the future. Kent School 0 District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes a to capacity and standard of service. This process will affect various aspects of the District's v standard of service and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. N 0 N Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students o N N • Class size ratio for grades K - 3 is planned for an average of 23 students per class, not U L to exceed 26. y • Class size ratio for grades 4 - 6 is planned for an average of 27 students per class, not to exceed 29. °o Some special programs require specialized classroom space and the program capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their cc regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in special programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs. c Students may also be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate c classroom or facility. Q Some identified students will also be provided educational opportunities in classrooms for special programs such as those designated as follows: Y English Learners (EL) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title 1)— Federal Program Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) —State Program Highly Capable Students—State Program Q c Reading, math or science Labs Dual Language Programs in four elementary schools and one middle school 0. E 0 U Inclusive Education Service for Elementary and Secondary students with disabilities may be provided in a separate or self-contained classroom sometimes with a capacity of 10-15 E students, depending on the program. M 0 r Q Packet Pg. 79 4.F.a Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational a opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school a buildings per the negotiated collective bargaining agreement with KEA. c • The average class size ratio for grades 7-8 is 30 students per class and 143 students per day,with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 150 based on five class periods o per day. N • The average class size ratio for grades 9-12 is 32 students per class and 153 students per day,with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 160 based on five class periods per day. c �a L Like Inclusive Education Programs listed above, many other secondary programs require o specialized classroom space which can reduce the functional capacity of the permanent school buildings, such as technology labs, performing arts activities, a variety of career and technical U education programs, and other specialized programs. o N M N Space or Classroom Utilization r U L Y As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for 0 certain programs,and the need for teachers to have a workspace during their planning periods, o it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the Kent School District has (n determined that the standard utilization rate is 95%for secondary schools. Functional capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level. 3.1 cc L M U- L Q Y c a� c a� E Q c d 0. E 0 U c m E M U 0 r Q 8 Packet Pg. 80 4.F.a IV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently,the District has permanent functional capacity to house 39,946 students and interim a (portable) capacity to house 4,360. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service -oa as set forth in Section III. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, Q as address and current capacity(See Table 3).The ratio between permanent capacity and portable capacity is 89.1%-10.9%. L 0 The functional capacity is periodically updated for changes in the programs, additional classrooms, and new schools. Functional capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect M program changes implemented in the Fall of 2021. m c Calculation of Elementary, Middle School and Senior High School capacities are set forth in c Appendices A, B, and C. Maps of existing schools are included. 0 a- For clarification, the following is a brief description of some of the non-traditional programs v for students in Kent School District: N 0 N The 2021-2022 school year began with our newly branded Academy Program within the N 0 district, housed at our new Kent Laboratory Academy. The project was approved by the Kent N Board of Directors in 2019 by utilizing funding from the 2016 Bond Project "20 Classrooms". The new facility has 24 classrooms and will now be utilized for many types of Academy related y programs. The previous facility of this program (Kent Phoenix Academy Campus) will have the o voter approved 2018 Levy Projects completed and has added to our current capacity for our °o District at the secondary level in the future. iGrad - Kent School District has developed the Individualized Graduation and Degree Program or "iGrad". iGrad is an Open Door (Drop-out Reengagement) School that offers a second plus chance to students aged 16-21 who have dropped out of high school or are at risk of not earning a high school diploma by age 21. iGrad is not included in this Capital Facilities Plan, because it is served as a leased space at the Kent Hill Plaza Shopping Center. Over the past a three years, enrollment in the iGrad program has averaged over 300 students. 3 Q a� Y c a� c a� E Q c d 0. E 0 U c m E t U 0 r Q 9 Packet Pg. 81 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS 2021 -2022 m SCHOOL Year opened ABR ADDRESS Functional r a� Capacity r a 0 Carriage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235- 140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 626 Q Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042 568 v Covington Elementary 2018 CO 25811 156th Avenue SE,Covington 98042 744 c Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225-180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 629 L East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 779 O Emerald Park 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 653 co N Fairwood Elementary 1969 FW 16600-148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 528 Cl) M George T. Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 640 Glenridge Elementary 1996 GR 19405-120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 591 to Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700-191st Place SE, Kent 98042 595 C Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641 -144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 634 O Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915-186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 668 1 IL Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700-64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 760 ILL V Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660-142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 725 ap Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 768 N Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710-108th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 706 CO) N Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621 -140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 820 N Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98030 688 Neely-O'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 864 C Panther Lake Elementary 2009 PL 12022 SE 216th Street, Kent, 98031 813 N 0 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 728 G Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825-118th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 732 0 t Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030-162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 661 j River Ridge Elementary 2021 RR 00000-22420 Military Rd S SeaTac,WA 886 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135-228th Ave SE, Black Diamond 98010 549 Scenic Hill Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030 837 Soos Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 591LL y Springbrook Elementary 1969 SB 20035-100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 730 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300-132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 719 c Elementary TOTAL 20,232 Cedar Heights Middle School 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 Street, Covington 98042 1,170 Q Mattson Middle School 1981 MA 16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042 1,020 = Meeker Middle School 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 1170 Y Meridian Middle School 1958 MM 23480-120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 1,110 ' Mill Creek Middle School 2005 MC 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 1,200 Northwood Middle School 1996 NW 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 1,140 c Kent Phoenix Acedamy 1966 KPA 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98030 1,140 Middle School TOTAL 7,950 Q c R Kent-Meridian High School 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98030 2,595 d Kentlake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042 2,714 E Kentridge Senior High School 1968 KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 2,996 V Kentwood Senior High School 1981 KW 25800-164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 2,917 r c d Senior High TOTAL 11,222 E t v Kent Laboratory Academy 2021 KLA 00000-208th St Kent,WA 98030 542 DISTRICT TOTAL 39,946 Q Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 10 Table 3 Packet Pg. 82 '& KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT ElementarySchoo1 8oundOLn hEQUITY I EXCELLENCE I COMMUNITY Tukwila Ell lott G -6 Mir r 1 Seattle-Tacoma McMlcken �FairwoodES a LL . International Heights M Fai ood If U Airport w an Country Cedar �� Mi N Club Mountain c Gt Issaqu c e S 180th 5t Ce��a Natul CV e Carriage Ridgewood ES t1) 167 Crest ES Ell SeaTac C 5 188th St 515 Ill Cedar Grove CD pring 09 181 L ke/Lake Glenridge,ES ire Park Lake Ilk Youngs_ES �� yL.r Springbrook ES Lake 5 A > O °0 Youngs O L � Panther Emerald - V Lake'El Park ES 18 (n Des Moines # Q Soos Creek ES River I Su Ridge ES � 'ise ES !� Ilk Park S 24th St i Ne Orchard ES II Brien ES N 4 ® 1 Maple Valley u_ Midway 1 East Hill ES c SE 2 Kenf ES 5 5 Daniel ES Martin L rp :y a nt � Sortun ES 3 � Ir Meridian � O Ln # Heights Crestwood ES 3 ' 41 99 Regional Al. Q �' Q Scenic Justice Meridian ES Covington ES E Hill ES The Outreach Jk AL Program' in Elk Cedar Valley ES Jenkins 1l r Millennium ES Creek ES Cherokee Bay Star Lake , d Coving Park Meadow � Ridge ES Horizon ES U Pinedree.ES ® � J 5 288th St Grass Lake ES Henrys Q z d 509 Q m / L ke E ke N _ So yerLn V T � � �552 ft " Q ~ .,Lea Hill wowods ES C a� E E 5 320th St v N a Auburn Auburn Washington Black Diamond ral Way Narrows National Golf i5 I i I Natural Area club Packet Pg. 83 w Miles Ln 4& KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT -w EQUITY EXCELLENCE COMMUNITY Middle School Boun&�� VVVV VVVV 518 Maplewood w Tukwila Elliott > 4` Mirrorr Il LL uj McMicken w Ll U Fai ood Golf 00 andy Heights > an Country Cedar Middle c k Club tQ Issaquah C N Mountain Cedar�' Natural A N s 180th St 1fi7 G S 188th St SeaTac s15 �ivorthwood MS Cedar Grove 4 So9 181 Meeke MS V 618 ft .. - 1 rn f7 Lake O Youngs ^� /� t v Des Moines Natural ?� Resources Area L SE 224th S 228th St Meri LL Maple Valley Midway 181 Mill Creek MS S_ L L MeM,'.Rms p eights 3 L m Q 99 Mill Crec SE 256th St Q < Earthworks Park Lu v Y Q Cedar Cherokee Ba +' Star Lake gton 516 Heights Park y a) s o � Ra d , Henrys Q z ca a m L ke CL r Lake T Q ier p (U 552 ft a Lea Hill > a� S 320th st E t V N +, Auburn ton Washing Q Auburn Black Diamonc deral Way Narrows National Golf Natural Area Club 0 0.5 1 2 w 12 I I I I I 1,. Packet Pg. 84 Miles "� 4& KEIVT SCHOOL DISTRICT High School 8oundIm EQUITY EXCELLENCE COMMUNITY VVVV VVVV 518 Maplewood w Tukwila Elliott >> Mirrorr d LL uj McMicken w Ll U Fai ood Golf �a 00 andy Heights > an Country Cedar Middle c k Club tQ Issaquah C N Mountain Cedar�' Natural A N S 180th St G E7 N S 188th St SeaTac 515 Cedar Grave N So9 181 V 1 w �618 ft .7 rn a usa Kentridge HS Lake L Youngs v Des Moines i 1s >, Green River Natural Resources Area L SE 224th St � c,228th St N Maple Valley LL Midway 181 SE 2 515 L Kent Kent Meridia o Meridian_HS Hei ht L > 99 Mill C&k tw HS Q < Earthworks SE 256th St Ken ood Park Star Lake < Cherokee Bay Park am N s E M V� O � Ra d , Henrys Q z ca a z a Kentlake HS Q" r Lake T Q So yer V �552ft a a Lea Hill > a� S 320th st E t V N +, Auburn ton Washing Q Auburn Black Diamonc deral Way Narrows National Golf Natural Area Club 0 0.5 1 2 w 13 I I I I I I Packet Pg. 85 Miles "� 4.F.a a� c V - Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan o a In November 2016, the voters of the Kent School District approved a bond measure for $252 million. This new bonding authority provided for the replacement for Covington Elementary school, which opened in August of 2018. The new River Ridge Elementary school and our new Kent Laboratory Academy opened August 2021. 0 m N As a critical component of capital facilities planning, county and city planners and decision- makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety to and from school and bus stops as well as bus pull-outs and turn- arounds. 0 a- Included inthis Plan isan inventoryof potential projectsand sites identified bythe District which v 00 are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future (See Table 4&Sitemap). N 0 N N Voter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for some of these N and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is secured for purchase of additional sites, but some may be funded with impact fees as needed. N Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements, and some o property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. c The Board will continue an annual review of standards of service and those decisions will be `n to reflected in each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. L Our District is in the initial stages of a future Capital Measure which is aligned to Strategic Plan and continues to make a priority to revitalize, rejuvenate and rebuild our aging schools as well U_ as begin a process to remove interim classroom portables and find room or create permanent structures to reduce and eventually eliminate the more than 172 portable classrooms in our district. We will continue to determine capacity versus enrollment as well as programs to ensure this goal to reduce and or eliminate all portables in our district is obtained in the next a several years. Y As a part of the planning process, the District has been tracking a few major development projects which have affected enrollment and will continue to increase students' forecasts. On E Meeker Street in Kent we have seen several major apartment complexes, ETHOS and Midtown 64 Apartments. These continue to have an impact on enrollment as they fill up their newly Q built facilities. Alexian Gateway Project is located on the corner of Military Road and Veterans Drive in Kent and will start occupancy in school year 2023-2024, with 283 planned units. a a E 0 In Covington,we are tracking a multi-family house development which has been approved and L) construction has begun. The 1700-unit Lakepointe Urban Community will fall within our enrollment boundary and proposed completion of Phase 4 is shown to be 2027. E U 0 r a 14 Packet Pg. 86 4.F.a c Construction in the Kent School District boundaries have been steadily rising over the last a three years and planned communities are now being recognized through the planning teams Q in multiple city and county jurisdictions we serve. c c L 0 N M M V C fC C L 0 U 00 N O N M N CO N y r V �L 0 0 V U) L Q� U- R L a Y c a� c d E Q c d 0. E 0 U c E t c.� r Q 15 Packet Pg. 87 4.F.a APARTMENT PROJECTS WITH MULTIPLE BUILDINGS SHALL HAVE MONUMENT SIGNS------- SHOWING THE STREET ADDRESSES OF EACH BUILDING AT EACH VEHICLE ENTRANCE TO THE SITE. EACH ETHICAL ENTRANCE SHALL ALSO HAVE AN ILLUMINATED SITE PLAN AND/OR DIRECTLY SIGNS. THE SIGNS SHALL SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE SIGN (THE VIEWER'S I /< CURRENT LOCATION)AND ALL BUILDING ADDRESSES. DWELLING NUMBERS SHALL BE \ INCLUDED. THE MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL HAVE A CONTRASTING BACKGROUND COLOR. ALL SITE SIGNAGE TO BE PER OWNERS SPECIFICATION AND DESIGN AND UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. KATERRA " INDICATE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF ILLUMINATED BUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE. SIGNAGE FOR BUILDINGS MUST INCLUDE THE ENTIRE BUILDING ADDRESS AND STREET NAME. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE NO LESS THAN SIX(6) INCHES IN HEIGHT. THE BUILDING SIGN SHALL HAVE A CONTRASTING BACKGROUND COLOR. I I 542 1 st AVE. SOUTH, FLOOR 4 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 ALL DRAWINGS,SPECIFICATIONS,PLANS,IDEAS, ARRANGEMENTS AND DESIGNS REPRESENTED OR REFERRED TO ARE THE PROPERTY OF AND ARE OWNED BY KATERRA INC.WHETHER THE PROJECT FOR WHICH THEY ARE MADE IS EXECUTED OR NOT.THEY WERE CREATED, EVOLVED,DEVELOPED AND PRODUCED FOR THE SOLE USE ON AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT AND NONE OF THE ABOVE MAY BE DISCLOSED OR GIVEN TO OR USED BY ANY PERSON,FIRM OR CORPORATION FOR ANY USE OR PURPOSE WHATSOEVER INCLUDING ANY OTHER PROJECT,EXCEPT UPON WRITTEN PERMISSION AND / - --- - _ _ - - - DIRECTION OF KATERRA INC. _ _ _ ©2019 KATERRA ARCHITECTURE LLC ©2019 KATERRA ARCHITECTURE II LLC ©2019 KATERRA ARCHITECTURE III PLLC ©2019 KATERRA ARCHITECTURE IV LLC I ` - -- 3106']�� 3107 � I 3102� � 3103 1 I ® L�______� I Consultant 3202 -------J 3110 3111 &3101 i �� 3302 3203 i 3206 3207 3210 3211 1 3201� 3402 3303 ; 3306 3307 3310 3311 3301 - ' U TRASH ENCLOSURES 3403 I 3406 3407 3410 3411 3401 v I 20 i 1�3a �� ----------- --------------------- ------------- ----------------J-L---------------- 3 db---- 1�3$ TRASH EN OS RES ---- ------------------------- 311 3214 I Owner -"',�g'1 v 3314 l 1 3� * \ 3101 3104 3105 3108 3109 3112 3414 12 \ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' I ' 3201 3204 3205 3208 3209 3212 I = A3 3301 3304 3305 rn " 3308 I 3309 312 I I TCR \ \ \ 1 \ 3401 3404 3405 3408 3409 3412 I TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL a v --- \ -� -------- I LL \ \\ \ D 2 3116 3115 +c \ \ \ 3216 &3215 a \ \ \ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �� 3316 3315 �9 3416 3415 I ) v v 236 ,\ ------------- - I o a v 23 ------ 3118 I o 3217 3218 33 = � 3317 3318 I c 1 - - 0 -- ML v ,Lg3 23� v �� 03 3417 3418 11331 I ab- \ \ FYI TRASH ENCLOSURES - I m � Q I ea �Z3 2 A\23 'Z ---------------- r--- -- - 3119 I a g3 ,�33 3 p ------ I � 3220 3219 I > v \ 3320 3319 II 3420 3419 II d d I o 9 2 � 2 9 y ------ \ 3122 II d 1 5 3221 3222 � 22� 05 2 3321 3322 II c \ -- A3`Z / 230 2 0� 3421 3422 111 II a v ���� Zt�05 Q v AMENITY SPACE II �132a O 2N°ar-------------------' $ 2 \ 1 co 22 231° � i� 3123 I M \ \ \ \ � 2�1 ------ � 3223 I ...- \ 3323 4) v 25 3224 3423 _ 3324 = 3424 Key plan � 230p9 2�1 LL ` \ 2� TRASH ENCLOSUR V 00 o N N �_ 1�221 Professional Seal w TRASH ENCLOSURES v rL13 o n o RECIS y -2�8 A R CI-1 T E 1�3�a \ O 000, 1000, d d LL STAIE 15 6� \ 13 � ,L"16 \ ` 1 / AL EXAN o GATEWAY ell\ 11216 121°� o APARTMENTS E E 23000 MILITARY RD S, 6 O 0 O G I<ENT, WA 98032 a G a 'a 15 G 11 11 O \ 0 Drawn By RM r \ �1 1'\1 -1201 o Project Manager RIM a / Job Number 075-18001 1 Date Of Original 12/13/19 Av�1° 0� v / ��, v / Revisions \ 1p n�0 ���OD vv / Mark Date Description / / 0 06/12/2019 PERMIT SET 2 01/09/2020 REV.3ITCD A�0 9 \ 1 "v" / UPDATES 6 05/22/2020 PC1 CORRECTIONS 1209 / LEGEND --------------- 3 / ONE BEDROOM UNITS / / / \ 1 06 �2p6 ;--------------� TWO BEDROOM UNITS / 2° THREE BEDROOM UNITS / / / I FC SET 3" 0 11N0'1 � / / 10/30/2020 / & TYPE A UNITS \ / / ----- NO UNIT - GARAGE ONLY \ UNIT BUILDING SIGNAGE NUMBERING/ NORTH ADDRESSING LV/ i 1 . UNIT NUMBERS READ TOP TO SHEET(1 ,2,3) BOTTOM (FLOOR 1 -4) AS INDICATED ON THE UNIT STACK UNIT NUMBERING PLAN G - 00 - 014 1 SCALE: 3/64"= 1'-0" 16 Packet Pg. 88 Phasin Le end NOTE: 4.F.a g g I I THE LOCATION OF DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDINGS ROADWA TRAILS, IS APPROXIMATE AND DOES NOT VEST TO THIER SPECIFIC WILL Phase 1 A - Maple Hills Division 5 LOCATION. THE LOCATION OF ALL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE BASED Preliminary Plat approval in third Quarter 2021. Construction and Final ON EXISTING CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION AND THE Plat Recording 2022. TERMS OF THE PLANNED ACTION, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Q AND APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE,AND FEDERAL LAWS. O Phase I B - Approximate Years 2019-2024 a Establishment of final grade, construction of Covington Connector to Southeast boundary, construction of first phase of commercial development. Phase 2 - Approximate Years 2020-202S ° Establishment of final lake perimeter, construction of 191 st Place SE N extension and associated R-12 residential development, construction of M second phase of commercial development on peninsula. Phase 3 - Approximate Years 2023-2028 _ Construction of third phase of commercial development. L Phase 4 - Approximate Years 2020-2027 ° Phase 3 Completion of gravel pit reclamation, construction of MR and U- �R-12 residential development V 00 Ste\$ N O N M N O N in O L Phase 1 B 6 SFz Phase 1 A Vol Phase 4 0 O m LL O f0 a Phase 2 t Y n �6P ao - � O PejGO E E O Q SE 260th St a O h C. O E Q O e- U O _ O Lake ointe Urban Villa a Phasing Map N ° °° 200 P S AI,POINTE SCALE: 4°° �� lanuar Updated SepteZl Packet Pg. 89 Legend NOTE: Medium Density Residential(R-6) ' Focal Point/Public Gathering Spot THE LOCATION OF DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDINGS ROADWAY,-) High Density Residential(R-12) Gateway Element TRAILS, IS APPROXIMATE AND DOES NOT VEST TO THIER SPECIFIC LOCATION. THE LOCATION OF ALL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE BASED Mixed Residential(MR) Proposed Park and Ride Facility \ ON EXISTING CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION AND THE Mixed Use/Commercial(RCMU) © Transit Stop TERMS OF THE PLANNED ACTION, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Q AND APPLICABLE LOCAL,STATE,AND FEDERAL LAWS. o Mix of Multi-Family and Commercial is Proposed Truck and Bus Return Route Q Encouraged within Peninsula Area _-- Public Streets Stop Light © Central Pond Feature cab Bike Route w p Wetland O Proposed Trail Parking / 7 L Ir- Jenkins Creek \ /. Wetland BufferCID Pedestrian/Wildlife Undercrossin9 �� .. .. ... .. .. . .W W' �'✓'� W... ...f . . . . . . . . . . M Publicly Accessible Parks and Plazas �� c . W . . . (D Landscape Areas Disturbed(Graded)Open Space C Undisturbed Open Space W W . . . . . W W W W W . � C O Covington Highlands Trail goR-6 OPEN SPACE W W W a ....... Trails/Offsite Trail Connections / 1,880,037SF 43.16 AC ••� . . ��� V ---��\ go 00 Steep Slope and Buffer © . / •f G 15\ I RCMU PARKS MR OPEN SPACE N /� ...�.rl, ---- 24,956 SF _ 0.57 AC 20.52 AC 2,507 F MR PARKS \ R-6 OPEN SPACE N O 12,799 SF J� 57,182 SF O 0.29 AC 1.31 AC N R-12 OPEN SPACE ® M 51687 SF `o�0e 0.13 AC .. 7 C 2P J i R-12 PARK I ♦�� oSc$ 32,553 SF r 0.75 AC S\ i R-6 PARKS ♦� ♦���, 8 SF SPECIAL PAVEMENT R-6 PARKS i <i 1 o.z�AC ID♦ 14,112 SF J I y _ G ♦���,, 0.32 AC FUTURE CONNECTION BEYOND PROPERTY BY OTHERS ..a. MR PARKS R-6OPEN SPACE - ❑ 139,8375E 12.54ACF �'' ' 3.21AC MR PARKS f 128.425 SF - - O 2.95 AC d ♦ R-12 OPEN SPACEPA 12 .✓� r. 4,549 SF 12,500 SF / \�. y*J� LL RCMU OPEN SPACE ® 86,894 SF .' 1.99 AC CENTRAL POND FEATURE ! RCMU PARKS w R-12 PARKS 97,621 SF - R-12 PARKS 7,2S4 SF 2.24 AC 14,185 SF 0.17 AC R 12 OPEN SPACE 0.33 AC fie. r COMBINED OPEN SPACE TABLE 572,210SF i 13.14AC ZONE GROSS PARKS OPEN SPACE* POND TOTAL NET ACRES** a)2 ACREAGE AMENITIES � R-12 OPEN SPACE / / RCMU 91.25 AC 2.81 AC 1.99 AC 8.41 AC 13.21 AC 78.03 AC e 34,788 SF ` �; � "�� ` `� MR 34.00 AC 5.78 AC 0.52 AC 2.43 AC 8.73 AC 25.27 AC 4) R-6 53.51 AC 0.55 AC 47.68 AC 0.00 AC 48.23 AC 5.27 AC 'a R-12 35.34AC 1.53AC 14.17AC 7.67AC 23.37AC 11.98AC d s/ ..,q � x�` �y •= TOTAL 214.10 AC 10.67 AC 64.36 AC 18.51 AC 1 93.55 AC 120.55 AC E *OPEN SPACE INCLUDES CRITICAL AREAS,BUFFERS,AND OTHER GREEN SPACES = **NET ACRES EQUALS GROSS ACREAGE MINUS TOTAL AMENITIES s: a PARKS TABLE OPEN SPACE TABLE POND TABLE ° y� - ''"y `` :� /,.. ZONE SQFOOTAGE ACREAGE ZONE SQFOOTAGE ACREAGE ZONE SQFOOTAGE ACREAGE Q' ~- '� e _ �., - •.� '��t�`^ RCMU 122,577SF 2.81 AC RCMU 86,984SF 1.99 AC RCMU 366,128SF 8.41 AC Q � - y .�_ -�-'` J`•-# _� R � i* ° MR 251,9105F 5.78 AC MR 22,507 SF 0.52 AC MR 106,040 SF 2.43 AC U ^l� - V , R-6 24,020 SF 0.55 AC R-6 2,077,056 SF 47.68 AC R-6 0 SF 0.00 AC w f a J ',f•- R-12 66,492 SF 1.53 AC R-12 617,234 SF 14.17AC R-12 334,094 SF 7.67 AC = TOTAL 464,999 SF 10.677 TOTAL 2,803,691 SF 64.36 AC TOTAL 806,2625E 18.51 AC d _ ► _ ::1�"�r--y �-�-, - � <- a= ,ter ��. Lakepointe Urban Village Master Development Plan N ° °° Z°° 2� SCALL. I"= 400 OAKPOINTE 18 Ian Updated Septe Packet Pg. 90 4.F.a a� c VI - Portable Classrooms o a The Plan references use of portables as interim capacity for facilities. c c Currently,the District utilizes portables to house students more than functional capacity and for program purposes at some school locations (Please see Appendices A, B,Q. 0 N Based on enrollment projections, implementation of full day kindergarten programs, lower FIL state mandated class sizes, functional capacity, and no need for additional interim capacity, the District anticipates no need to purchase or lease additional portables during the next six- year period to ensure capacity requirement(Noted in section V. Six Yr. Planning Construction). O During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the a District's portables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of U 00 the portables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in o others, and these portables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of M the community. N N r Portables may be used as interim facilities: N 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. o 2. To cover the gap between the times of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. L Portables currently in the District's inventory are continually evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced or when possible, be removed due to life expectancy. The Ui Districts goal is to reduce and or eliminate all portables so we may provide an equitable c learning environment for all. c The Plan projects that the District will use portables to accommodate interim housing needs a for the next six years and beyond.The use of portables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between portables, emerging Y technologies, and educational restructuring will continue to beexamined. as E c a� E Q c a a E 0 U c m E t U r Q 19 Packet Pg. 91 4.F.a a� c VII - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity o a As stated in Section IV, the functional capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size requirements, class size fluctuations etc. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3, the functional capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts (See Tables 5& 5a-b-c). N M Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment "snapshot in time" to report enrollment for the year. �a L Kent School District continues to be the fifth largest district (both FTE and headcount basis) in the state of Washington.The P-223 Headcount for October 2021 was 24,150 with kindergarten U_ students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECSE and college-only Running Start students. 00 N O N In October 2021,there were an additional 1,397 students in 11th and 12th grade participating N in the Running Start program at different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school N and college graduation. Of these students, 517 attended classes only at the college ("college- only") and are excluded from FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District has one of the highest Running Start program participation rates in the o state. o 0 Based on the enrollment forecasts, permanent facility inventory and capacity, current ;, standard of service, portable capacity,and future additional classroom space,the District plans 3.1 f° to continue to satisfy required capacity through the interim use of portables (See Table 5 and Tables 5 a-b-c). U_ While the district currently shows available capacity to address projected need on a purely statistical basis, there are variety of extenuating factors that need to be considered. First,the 3 district is currently undertaking a study to understand how much of our existing physical space 3 capacity is occupied by program needs, present and future. Our current capacity estimate is a an accurate depiction of total available space; however, we are aware that it potentially Y overstates our ability to accommodate actual classroom growth. Our analysis of this program use will not be complete until the completion of this year's plan, but we expect actual available classroom space to be significantly less. Secondly, the Kent School District currently makes significant use of portables, which we do not consider as part of our permanent standard of E service. We have included portable space in our capacity figures, but long-term we do not consider that a permanent space solution. Thirdly, Kent is unusual in that is incorporates a neighborhoods intersecting with at least 6 municipalities, including Kent, Auburn, Black E Diamond, Maple Valley, Renton, and SeaTac. The district covers 73 square miles and includes U over 40 schools. Within this large geographic area, we expect to have pockets of localized c as capacity need that are not necessarily reflected in the aggregate figures. As one example, the E U 0 r a 20 Packet Pg. 92 4.F.a a� c Lakepointe Urban Village development in Covington may require new classroom capacity even a as space may exist in schools on the far other end of the district's boundaries. Finally, COVID- a 19 has created significant enrollment loss in our community which we believe is temporary; a status shared by most of our neighboring districts. The district is not discontinuing its plans to accommodate for the return of those students, and future normal growth on top of that. 0 N M M N V C R C L 0 a- U- U 00 N O N M N O N N r V �L Y N O O M V U) M fC L U- L Q Y c a� c a� E Q c d 0. E O U c m E M U O r Q 21 Packet Pg. 93 4.F.a KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT a a� .y c a� s a� Q. E O U a� t .r c r O. O Q SCHOOL YEAR 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 0 c Actual P R O J E C T E D c Permanent Functional Capacity 1 35,586 35,586 35,586 35,586 35,586 I 35,586 I 35,586 O W N M Changes to Permanent Capacity ' Capacity Increase (F) c m c O a LL U Additional Permanent Classrooms 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 N O N M N O N Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 35,586 35,586 35,586 35,586 35,586 35,586 35,586 r N Interim Portable Capacityo Elementary Portable Capacity Required 3,405 3,405 3,405 3,405 3,405 3,405 3,405 c Middle School Portable Capacity Required 315 315 315 315 315 315 315 N Senior High School Portable Capacity Required 640 640 640 640 640 640 640 Interim Portable Capacity Total 4,360 4,360 4,360 4,360 4,360 4,360 4,360 J M" N d LL TOTAL CAPACITY ' 39,946 39,946 1 39,946 1 39,946 1 39,946 1 39,946 1 39,946 c M c TOTAL ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 2 1 24,150 1 25,750 1 26,118 1 26,250 1 26,225 1 26,216 1 26,242 Q c DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 15,796 14,196 13,828 13,696 13,721 13,730 13,704 Y c 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. m E 2 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study,2021("Medium Growth Model") c a� E Q c co a Q. E O U c O E s c� m r Q Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 May 2022 22 Packet Pg. 94 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY - Grades K - 6 SCHOOL YEAR 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 1 2024-25 1 2025-26 1 2026-27 fD 8 a 0 Actual P R O J E C T E a a� U c 0 c =a Elementary Permanent Capacity' 16,827 16,827 16,827 16,827 16,827 16,827 16,827 co N Cl) M d V C Additional Permanent Classrooms 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 =a L Subtotal 16,827 16,827 16,827 16,827 16,827 16,827 16,827 O a u_ U 00 N Interim Portable Capacity N 3,405 31405 3,405 3,405 3,405 3,405 3,405 CO) N O TOTAL CAPACITY '1 z 20,232 20,232 20,232 20,232 20,232 20,232 20,232 N L a.+ ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION a 13,049 14,270 14,407 14,403 14,438 14,449 14,411 0 0 0 to SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 7,183 5,962 5,825 5,829 5,794 5,783 5,821 Ta L U_ 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. c 2 Additional classrooms will be placed at schools with the greatest need for aleve overcrowding 3 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study,2021 ("Medium Growth Model") Q Enrollment&Projections reflect FULL Day Kindergarten at ALL Elementary schools @ 1.0&exclude ECSE Preschoolers. m Y m c m E a a a E 0 U r c m E t v �a a Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A May 2022 23 Packet Pg. 95 4.F.a KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY a) c :r MIDDLE SCHOOL - Grades 7 - 8 0 Q SCHOOL YEAR 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 1 2025-26 2026-27 2027-2028 Actual P R O J E C T E D O m N M M N Middle School Permanent Ca acit ' 7,635 7,635 7,635 7,635 7,635 7,635 7,635 0 c c L lChanges to Middle School Capacity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a- U_ U 00 N O N Subtotal 7,635 7,635 7,635 7,635 7,635 7,635 7,635 N 0 N N r Portable Interim Capacity1 L Y N TOTAL CAPACITY 1&3 7,635 7,635 7,635 7,635 7,635 7,635 7,635 6 0 U) ENROLLMENT PROJECTION 2 3,862 4,079 4,008 4,065 4,119 4,090 4,17E L u- SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 3,773 3,556 3,627 3,570 3,516 3,545 3,460 -0 c ca c L Q No Classroom Portables required at middle schools at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. +; N 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. Y 2 Projection Source:Les Kendrick Demographic Study,2021 ("Medium Growth Model") C a� 3 Surplus capacity due to grade level reconfiguration-All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004. C N E Q c cv d 0. E O U c m E t U O r Q Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B May 2022 24 Packet Pg. 96 4.F.a KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY a) c :r SENIOR HIGH - Grades 9 - 12 0 Q SCHOOL YEAR 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-2026 2026-27 2027-28 Actual P R O J E C T E D m N M M N Senior High Permanent Ca acit 10,582 10,582 10,582 10,582 10,582 10,582 10,582 V c c EL O Changes to High School Cap acit 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LL U 00 N O N M N O Subtotal 10,582 10,582 10,582 10,582 10,582 10,582 10,582 N N r V L Y Portables Interim Capacity 1 (n In 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 1 10,582 10,582 10,582 10,582 1 10,582 1 10,582 1 10,582 U) ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION s 7,239 7,401 7,703 7,782 7,668 7,677 7,656 W m U_ SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 3,343 3,181 2,879 2,800 2,914 2,905 2,926 0 c L No Classroom Portables required at this time.Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. Q Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 3 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study,2021 ("Medium Growth Model") Y C a� C N E Q c cv d 0. E O U c m E t U O r Q Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C May 2022 25 Packet Pg. 97 4.F.a a� VIII - Finance Plan 0 The finance plan shown on Tab/e 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance a as improvements for the years 2021-2022 through 2027-2028.The financing components include c secured and unsecured funding and impact fees.The plan is based on future bond issues, state school construction assistance, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management 0 Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. N M M In November 2016, the District held a special election to approve the authorization of as $252,000,000 in bonding authority. The projects described below are part of this authorization. The first series of bonds ($80 million) were issued in February 2017, which c funded the Covington Elementary Replacement School, as well as other infrastructure -a 0 projects. Impact fees were used at both River Ridge Elementary School and Kent Laboratory a Academy projects due to escalation in construction pricing across the Pacific Northwest. v 00 N According to RCW 82.02.090, the definition of an impact fee is ". . . a payment of money N imposed upon development as a condition of development approval to pay for public facilities N needed to serve new growth and development, and that is reasonably related to the new N development that creates additional demand and need for public facilities, that is a proportionate share of the cost of the public facilities, and that is used for facilities that y reasonably benefit the new development. 'Impact fee' does not include a reasonable permit o or application fee." Mitigation or impact fees can be calculated on the basis of "unhoused °o student need" or"the maintenance of a district's level of service" as related to new residential development. to 3.1 A mitigation/impact fee may be imposed based upon a determination of insufficient existingcc permanent and/or interim portable school space or to pay for permanent and/or newly acquired interim portable school space previously constructed as a result of growth in the district. A district's School Board must first approve the application of the mitigation or impact fees and, in turn,approval must then be granted by the other general government jurisdictions 3 having responsibility within the district, counties, cities and towns. (Kent, Covington, Renton, a Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac) as Y Though the current enrollment projections increase for both elementary and secondary r schools are relatively flat, the ongoing need to provide permanent instructional facilities to house students is a driving need as the shifts in our family populations continue, due to ongoing development. Previously collected Impact fees may be used to support and address the challenges related to the number of interim instructional facilities currently in use, the Q replacement of some of these aged facilities,the maintenance of the district's level of services, v and the potential expansions to existing facilities in future years. a. Q. E 0 The Kent School District 2021-2022 CFP update includes continued execution of the 2016 Capital U Bond Projects and anticipation of the data collection and review of our Facility Assessment Reports within the coming months. With the opening of our River Ridge Elementary School and the Kent E U r a Packet Pg. 98 4.F.a Laboratory Academy, we are advancing opportunities to add capacity for our programs and student- c based needs. The District Facilities and Capital Planning Teams have been preparing to complete an o initial plan (Spring 2022) as we move the next steps of creating a Capital Bond Planning Task Force a (CBPTF) —which will include District personnel, design professionals, teaching staff, student voice as well as community members to being well collaborated discussions to this platform. Our initial plan has revealed priorities including school replacement due to age, and the need for added permanent facilities to (1) reduce and eliminate our need for portables and (2) accommodate future growth as housing in the Kent region continues to expand. Once the CBPTF has it will be brought before the N District's Board of Directors for comments, discussion, and approval. A Capital Bond Measure would RI follow soon after approval. Future updates to this Capital Facilities Plan will include details of any W adopted planning. L For the Six-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School O District Capital Planning Team. Please see pages 13-14 for a summary of the cost basis. U 00 Cost Basis Summary o M N O For impact fee calculations, construction estimated costs are based on the last elementary "' school built in Kent, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost future elementary school, as U well as average pricing of nearby school districts recently built new middle and new high y school projects. 0 0 Project Projected Cost New Elementary School $68,000,000 a m U_ c ca c New Middle School $155,000,000 0 Q New High School $220,000,000 Y c as c a� Site Acquisition Cost E Q c The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the a last ten years. Please see Table 7 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. 0. E 0 U c W E t U r Q Packet Pg. 99 4.F.a District Adjustment c :r Q. O The impact fee calculations on Appendix B & C result in a zero-dollar impact fee total for this a year but may be adjusted if needed per RCW 36.70A.130(2)(b) provision. C c L O N M M N V C R C L 0 a- LL U 00 N O N M N O N N r V �L Y N O O M V M fC L LL L Q Y c a� c a� E Q C d 0. E O U C m E M U O r Q Packet Pg. 100 4.F.a KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN N M M Secured Unsecured Impact d SCHOOL FACILITIES * 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 TOTAL Local&State State 2 or Local 3 Fees 5 v C Estimated Estimated C PERMANENT FACILITIES O (L No School Projects at this time. $0 U 00 N O N M N TEMPORARY FACILITIES C N Additional portables 3 ' $0 v L OTHER O N/A 0 U Totals r_$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0) �a F = Funded U = Unfunded M L NOTES: d 2 The District anticipates receiving some State Funding Construction Assistance for some projects. LL c s Facility needs are pending review.Some of these projects may be funded with impact fees. to c 4 Cost of portables based on current cost and adjusted for inflation for future years. 5 Fees in this column are based on amount of fees collected to date and estimated fees on future units. Q C d Y c m c m E Q c �a a. a E 0 U s= a� E t v �a Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 6 May 2022 Q 29 Packet Pg. 101 4.F.a KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions & Costs Average of Sites Purchased, Sold or Built on within last 10 Years a Year Open/ 0 Type& Purchased Q #on Map School / Site Sold Location Acreage Cost/Price Avg cost-price/acre Total Average Cost/Acre v Elementary c=o _ L O 12/Urban Property Sale-29.7 acres of Plemons-Yeh site 2016 SSE 124th Ave and 284th ST SE 29.70 $947,536 $31,904 to N 7/Rural Property Sale-Scarsella site 2015 2900 Kent Black Diamond RD SE 13.25 $330,000 $24,906 d 3/Rural Property Sale-Old Covington Parcel A, #362206-9081 2019 17070 SE Wax Rd,Covington 8.00 $3,869,697 $483,712 = 3/Rural Property Sale-Old Covington Parcel , #362206-9081 2021 17070 SE Wax Rd,Covington 8.00 $4,230,082 $528,760 =c O 6/Rural Property purchased for new elementary 2019 5 lots purchased Military Road South SeaTac WA 10.00 $1,770,355 $177,036 d LL Elementary Site Subtotal 68.95 $11,147,670 $161,678 V 00 Elem site average c N M Middle School o N N V No Acquisitions for Middle School 0.00 $0 y Middle School Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 Middle Schl Site Avg. 0 t C> to Senior High No Acquisitions for Senior Highs 0.00 $0 $0 3: Senior High Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 a) d Sr Hi Site Average LL Note:All rural sites were purchased prior to adoption of Urban Growth Area. _ Numbers correspond to locations on Site Bank&Acquisitions Map on Page 17. 7 Properties purchased prior to 2010 3 Q 1 /Urban Site-Covington area North (So of Mattson MS) 1984 d 2/Rural Site-Ham Lake east (Pollard) 1992 Total Acreage&Cost Total Average Cost/Acre Y 4/Urban Site-Shady Lake(Sowers-Blaine-Drahota-Paroline) 1995 68.95 $11,147,670 $161,678 c d 5/Rural Site-SE of Lake Morton area (West property) 1993 E 10/Urban Site-Yeh-Williams(W of 132 Ave SE at SE 288) 1999 _ 12/Urban Site-SE 256th Covington(Halleson) 2000 Q _ 12a/Urban Site-156th Ave. SE Covington(Wikstrom) 2004 a a E 0 U r _ d E t t� w Q Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 7 May 2022 30 Packet Pg. 102 4.F.a KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS a� c Student Generation Factors -Single Family Student Generation Factors -Multi-Family a Elementary (Grades K-6) 0.270 Elementary 0.082 a Middle School (Grades 7-8) 0.105 Middle School 0.035 Senior High (Grades 9- 12) 0.075 Senior High 0.029 c Total 0.450 Total 0.146 L O Projected Increased Student Capacity OSPI -Square Footage per Student, see side cha Elementary 0 Elementary 115 c�i M Middle School 850 Middle School 148 m Senior High (Academy) 0 Senior High 173 Special Education ?? Required Site Acreage per Facility Elementary (required) 12 Average Site Cost/Acre Middle School (required) 25 Elementary $161,678 U_ Senior High (required) 40 Middle School $0 v 00 Senior High $0 0 New Facility Construction Cost M Elementary $68,000,000 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost N Middle School $155,000,000 Elementary @ 24 $315,000 y r Senior High $220,000,000 Middle School @ 29 $315,000 U L Senior High @ 31 $315,000 w a 6 Temporary Facility Square Footage State Funding Assistance Credit G t Elementary 123,702 District Funding Assistance Percentage 51.86% U j Middle School 10,256 Senior High 21,296 Total 4.4% 155,254 Construction Cost Allocation CCA-Cost/Sq,Ft. $246.83 Permanent Facility Square Footage v_ Elementary 1,567,594 Middle School 760,483 District Average Assessed Value i Senior High/Other 1,077,315 Single Family Residence $574,784 Total 95.6% 3,405,392 Q Total Facilities Square Footage District Average Assessed Value Y Elementary 1,691,296 Multi-Family Residence $360,790 Middle School 770,739 Senior High/Other 1,098,611 c Total 3,560,646 Bond Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 $0.93 E Current Rate /1,000 Tax Rate 0.0009 Q C R Developer Provided Sites/ Facilities a 0. Value 0 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate E Dwelling Units 0 Current Bond Interest Rate 2.45% L) c CPI Inflation Factor 4.70% E Per OSPI Website v R r Q Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX A) May 2022 31 Packet Pg. 103 4.F.a KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 1M c CL Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Capacity)x Student Generation Factor a Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre Facility Capacity Student Factor V A 1 (Elementary) 12 $161,678 0 0.270 O O A 2 (Middle School) 25 $0 850 0.105 $0.00 A 3 (Senior High) 40 $0 0 0.075 Total 77 $161,678 850 0.450 O A $0.00 tp N Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence M Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x Permanent/Total Square Foota a Ratio Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary) $68,000,000 0 0.270 0.903 C B 2 (Middle School) $155,000,000 850 0.105 0.984 $18,840.71 = B 3 (Senior High) $220,000,000 0 0.075 0.998 Total $443,000,000 850 0.450 B b $18,840.71 Q Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence(Portables) a Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Temporary/Total Square Footage Ratio) LL Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio V C 1 (Elementary) $315,000 24 0.270 0.097 $343.74 C C 2 (Middle School) $315,000 29 0.105 0.016 $18.25 N C 3 (Senior High) $315,000 31 0.075 0.020 $15.24 N Total $945,000 84 0.450 C b $377.23 N State Funding Assistance Credit per Single Family Residence (formerly"State Match") N Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance% x Student Factor j Construction Cost Allocation SPI Sq.Ft./Student Assistance% Student Factor r D 1 (Elementary) $246.83 115 0.5186 0.270 $3,974.59 N D 2 (Middle School) $246.83 148 0.5186 0.105 $1,989.21 D 3 (Senior High) $246.83 173 0.5186 0.075 $1,660.88 O O D b $7,624.68 V Tax Credit per Single Fa mil Residence co Average SF Residential Assessed Value(AAV) $574,784 M Net Present Value(per EQ)(NPV) 8.77 Current Debt Service Rate/1,000 ( r) 0.09% TC $4,675.64 i (Below used to calculate NPV) N 13 Current Bond Interest Rate 2.45% 4) Years Amortized (10 Years)-Used in NPV Calculation 10 LL 13 C Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility/Site Value Dwelling Units O C 0 0 FC 0 7 3 Fee Recap** Q A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $0.00 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $18,840.71 N C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $377.23 Y Subtotal $19,217.94 d D = State Match Credit per Residence $7,624.68 E TC=Tax Credit per Residence $4,675.64 C Subtotal $12,300.32 d E a Total Unfunded Need $6,917.62 50%Developer Fee Obligation $3,459 d FC=Facility Credit(if applicable) $0 Q District Adjustment $3,459 E O Net Fee Obligation per Residence-Single Family $0.00 V r C d E s t� cC r a Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX B) Revised—June 2022 Packet Pg. 104 4.F.a KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE c Site Acquisition Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit 4+ Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facilit Ca acit x Student Generation Factor 0 Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre Facility Capacity Student Factor Q A 1 (Elementary) 12 $161,678 0 0.082 0) A 2 (Middle School) 25 $0 850 0.035 $0.00 0 A 3 (Senior High) 40 $0 0 0.029 Total 77 $161,678 850 0.146 A $0.00 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit 0 Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) c0 Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio M B 1 (Elementary) $68,000,000 0 0.082 0.903 B 2 (Middle School) $155,000,000 850 0.035 0.984 $6,280.24 d B 3 (Senior High) $220,000,000 0 0.029 0.998 V C Total $443,000,000 850 0.146 B $6,280.24 C Temporary Facility Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor x(Temporary/Total Square Footage Ratio Q Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $315,000 24 0.082 0.097 $104.40 d ILL C 2 (Middle School) $315,000 29 0.035 0.016 $6.08 0 C 3 (Senior High) $315,000 31 0.029 0.020 $5.89 N Total $945,000 84 0.146 C $116.37 N State Funding Assistance Credit per Multi-Family Residence (formerly"State Match") M Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance% x Student Factor G Area Cost Allowance SPI Sq.Ft./Student Equalization% Student Factor N D 1 (Elementary) $246.83 115 0.5186 0.082 $1,207.10 r D 2 (Middle School) $246.83 148 0.5186 0.035 $663.07 V D 3 (Senior High) $246.83 173 0.5186 0.029 $642.21 N D $2,512.37 Q Tax Credit per Multi Famil f Residence p Average MF Residential Assessed Value(AAV) $360,790 0 t Net Present Value(per EQ)(NPV) 8.77 co Debt Service Rate/1,000 ( r) 0.09% TC $2,934.88 (Below used to calculate NPV) Current Bond Interest Rate 2.45% Years Amortized (10 Years)-Used in NPV Calculation 10 i N 13 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility/Site Value Dwelling Units )l 0 0 FC p C LL C Fee Recap i 7 A = Site Acquisition per Multi-Family Unit $0.00 B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $6,280.24 Q C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $116.37 +; Subtotal $6,396.61 N D = State Match Credit per MF Unit $2,512.37 Y TC=Tax Credit per MF Unit $2,934.88 +�+ Subtotal $5,447.26 d E Total Unfunded Need $949.35 50%Developer Fee Obligation $475 d FC=Facility Credit(if applicable) 0 Q District Adjustment ($475) C Net Fee Obligation per Residential Unit-Multi-family $0.00 � a a E 0 0 d E s c� Q Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX C) Revised—June 2022 Packet Pg. 105 4.F.a KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity c Projected Projected %for a SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE LOCATION Type Status Completion Program new Date Capacity Growth y c d t Approximate Approximate y Map ELEMENTARY 0 U O t c MIDDLE SCHOOL&SENIOR HIGH Q- 0 Q m U c M c =a L O TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional W Capacity N M M Portables' c tv C :a #on 2 OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Land Use Land Use O Map Designation Type Jurisdiction a 12 256th-Covington(Halleson) 25435 SE 256th,Covington 98042 Rural To be sold King County V 12a 156th-Covington(Wikstrom) 25847 156th Ave.SE,Covington 98042 Rural To be sold King County N 0 N CO) Notes: N 0 N TBD-To be determined-Some sites are identified but placement,timing and/or configuration of portables has not been determined. 0 r z Numbers correspond to sites on Site Bank Map on Page 19.Other Map site locations are parcels identified in Table 7 on Page 29. r N in O 0 t 0 R fC L LL L 3 7 Q C N Y c a� E c a� E a M a 0. E 0 U c m E t v O r r Q Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 May 2022 34 Packet Pg. 106 4.F.a JINANU 3 eLvO O I a1ePork w SE 168 ST ¢ ���r,. od Fq��� ElemertaryVrJud Golf Lake NerghlsPork > Ceder CiovdAirporl� 3 < > ¢ ,1 ` ■ E n pie valle s MIMIC ENHTS51,2 PL . IPo ;' J ,`& Country Club S�tKo Cedar oun o w 3':` m Pork, C F ¢ = Ced M taiga%' �E '� -PE TSK o Fssr_. GRG d s+M Iis ST a g o �� w sE irs sT SE rROV sE Irs sr o S E A N TA +S w ¢ + + + + ly Rid od + PO + LL r�s '..> o C rri Crest Pe f ro v rf sky g_ 5E O , r w sQ\a 'S7 Or I I i a F"/, ST R� a sE iao sT E ementa HO Park' Ele on ry De f Ire, -1 GS ao U 00 BOW Valley Rrd9e GARB ¢ ¢ 'C"�a!//CVnrd ■o _ ■ SE ST PsE ,-.;�P� 'CI �`� RP�G\S x N -- LOke Pork _ �.`¢ J �� �� 7`^ Loke Youngsrr oil______ 8415 00 �� Lake f SE 1 4 ST S 88 STD �� ) kZonePork ScMid�TeFt - CQdBrGrQyQ Bsl el'~ I'x ■ jSE 188ST 9c N Angle Lk M eer - - Mee r 2 --':N\ SE 192 ST 6 °F o u 1 + + Q Pork + ,.,. m }.., _� + SE 192 ST 192 ST + ' __ + + + e c o eYoun s akC� ; s N Pk �� P N T E R b O g EI enta C, 0 0 o�N o Q) oFR 0 o S o 96 o ST o 0 0 0 c o 0 4 _ ` o 0 0 0 0 cv O N� � d- N O N O ■ °J eF N �O > N O ca (n a O in SE 96GI@h rh O ¢ 9F, N N *+ ST - �� - S 200 S$ 17mo T'` eta S 200 ST A TAC ■wlementa o +ake ¢' ry BE 200 ST Lake SE Pefe�son o ¢ n SE 204 ST of _ P N o— E g A Youngs / W Lake AFT y o- '� 8❑ Kent V InUiS t ratory a o L �`" High bo''..\`O ST + In lP �OLy lF` SE 208 ST f' + ¢x.isoi + d In+� + �, + GS WA rERSHED > o00�tr� 0 ST O i > aAther ke ■ Emeralda ¢ sNP e F� n �� O � ST _ ST > "' ry I o --------A-- clrr F sEnr E S 212 S > 5 ¢ Emerald Par w w 216 q 0 Brien ¢ j ElE�melita E�STD Soos Yee Connencf r FTFP Pp 90 S �sE N .> S 218 ST o,CreekPark l;."------rrail>-------- hadOW ,Park 5� a I- �i__�m ■Elem ntary', a r---J� ` /{ M V �+ K E J N T w s 222 sr eSE 222,ST w 'n `--- c�G w L a e A O S o �ffb � a + + �+ _ pr e SE + 224 + ST + O6 + + F QF SPA ,228 QT z32s8a orcnor E nta`---- ridio � --. S� Q 1 sezzas i -Park Orchard Q ,►� S ,. Pork_-:. Park 'a SE 232 d Neel Bri n ry - N SE 232 ST 'a Wes Canyon Ele �tO'y{ ,( ✓ �' N jam" > >¢ Pk/- w ■ rn T P'iKent >� �' _ Meridian d ¢ r�q'�F'`" LL 900 c ins j taemorio/ Middle School O ' o� H��o�m lornela o opt P _ \,... ■ w - �,.. \ 4204 - � i C 2T. RCS o E'( eek' T Eas Hill _ v .. SE r 240 ST + + �P Loke + > i s W JAMES ST + tSS + + N w ST+ O m + + eo,e ■ p meb > > Wilderness Pk SSA l Russell Py Merldl n ¢ - d Rd SMITH si ¢ �y vw 2 Matt on M EK' RS�sT > Le1dFfck 5�48 si ■ESN en` J �CO(ln r ■ Cr OOd N SE 248 STD r�A P Hi School �� �C/u� Mid e5c E e tary ood k 5 G°°ty socC n e� �� Ke Meridian ■' ry o e y P LokeWiIderness II Q Po o� � , ■ 6ol fCourse P 'n East Hill SE Kent Sch..Q�eistrict v' >'� T an ���vER �ggR4-ildernpss S254 Sr +P k{U 900 w+ MAPLE ST o^ + + Ad + + S 259 PI .. �, Woodp r�E /// 5' 25 ST °'y$O`..�,Cen er. ■Center' � � l ■ lie ht$ �$ h Lake Lucerne �\ Y T at Loke h 9i© o ■jy a Sek RkTn' ngton t!S d LokC c L pkeFenwick s zsz sT rS ilf eW a Outreach =Elegy�p� enta `high School Loke Fenwick N z `q E >■ P N� SE 266 ST `-.o e EI m aE zs dar Valley Wilder +-� sE 2s ST afn rop) _ �EnW%Ck N kq je n�Cq@ekes Elementary N Park r d 0z > ;Pork ¢ P SE zsT ST a -,,¢ l�rrdi on F O ea rk■ Q ■ Cedar Heights in E STAR SE2 11e m Middle School 72 ST �� N c a+VOr�n fO +SE 272 ST a EI hL Lake +-'Pork(Co(Co.J * gE + 272_ +� 516 + SE + s v+ G� S T� S� 5E- 274 ST J' '. /{�ert Inn (SE�KENT - KANGLEY Q y " L A K E �'�yy S 277 I� TN Green S\, 2 0■ nP�'i,t�eP Tr; - orizon > ��0 SE 276 ST - E S LAKE w ti Ri ow Ridge LPi XAerif ry., (ementa F �e Q STAR Rom J Trleln8s Pork ntaryP R �F; t SIG l oke �1 Couni sE yaI s ��, �o ,' - ovington N } ,r I Grass Lake Go If I Cou ca I Olson/on on SE` 284 ST 'a GO is SF s Elementary a Q Q work n Ed BerrydalC,e + �!+SAWYER + SE +gas a S Tr + + + fiv F I COVINGZO RD o AuburnMunlCipoi 4 /'� oos) Crest ' KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT GDL`a sE292 ST Air°°rk W ks°yer `;Course � Grass L ake sE ss sT ParklCoJ a - -�L N W ¢ Kentlake v O ST SITE ACQUISITIONS T High o rk %CauntyJSE 304 ST' + + z+ B + g ■;' m o° T E Park l9� ro PKEd,Lake Sawyer o _ Elementar' Lee '� Seolf/e Int N Hil l .�■ Q y �\ os SE 312 ST a2 Rocewoy�yyynaco oke Pork NWSI � m 9P� � ,Auburndote w f �SOOS1, -T 35 ©copyright KROLL MAP COMPANY,INC. This map has been modifi Packet Pg. 107 4.F.a c IX - Summary of Changes to June 2021 Capital Facilities Plan o Q The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the June 2021 Plan are summarized here. Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in class size ratio as well as program changes. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect use, lease or purchase, sale, M surplus and/or movement between facilities. aD The district worked with contractor Davis Demographics, LLC to update student generation factors. The updated rates are included in the body of the Plan. 0 The student headcount enrollment forecast is updated annually. All Elementary schools now U_ have Full Day Kindergarten so six-year Kindergarten projections were previously modified to 00 meet the requirements for Full Day Kindergarten programs at all elementary schools. o M N The district expects to receive some State Funding Assistance (formerly called "state matching N funds") for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded site and r facility needs will be reviewed in the future. 0 The impact fees for 2022 calendar year will result in a zero-dollar impact fee for both Single- c Family and Multi-Family due to reduced enrollment and the new capacity study completed in 2021. L Q� U_ R L a Y c a� c d E Q c d 0. E 0 U c W E t c.� r Q Packet Pg. 108 4.F.a X - Appendices 0 Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors Include: Q m c 0 Grade/ Increase/ ITEM FROM TO Comments T 'a YPe Decrease O Student Generation Factor Elem 0.277 0.270 -0.007 m Single Family(SF) MS 0.071 0.105 0.034 N M SH 0.086 0.075 -0.011 Total 0.434 0.450 0.016 Increase d c Student Generation Factor Elem 0.258 0.082 -0.176 S a L Multi-Family(MF) MS 0.058 0.035 -0.023 O SH 0.100 0.029 -0.071 d Total 0.416 0.146 -0.270 Decrease LL U 00 State Funding Assistance Ratios("State o Match") 53.79% 52.49% -1.30% Per OSPI Website NM N Area Cost Allowance $242.26 $246.83 4.570 Per OSPI Website Link c N Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SF $268,271 $574,784 306,513 Per King County r v AV-Average of Condominiums&Apts. MF $226,726 $360,790 134,064 Per King County N Debt Service Capital Levy Rate/$1000 $1.41 $0.93 ($0.48) Per King Co.Assessor Report c t General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 2.44% 2.45% 0.01% Bond Buyers 20 year GO Index co Removed due to L Impact Fee-Single Family SF $5,818.06 $0.00 ($5,818.06) Capacity/Enrollment Factors W Removed due to m LL Impact Fee-Multi-Family MF $2,457.53 $0.00 ($2,457.53) Capacity/Enrollment Factors 0 c� c L Q Y c d c a� E Q c d 0. E 0 U c d E t U co r Q Packet Pg. 109 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS o Each Scholar:A voice.A dream.A BRIGHT future. a d C� C C O M Lake Grove Elementary Mirror Lake Elementary Wildwood Elementary O a U. 00 N - O 6 O cc Thomas Jefferson High School Star Lake Elementary/ Evergreen Middle School L d LL s L Ta Olympic View K-8 School Memorial Field Renovation E a to a a E CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 0C E 2023 a Packet Pg. 110 4.F.a c Q. 0 Q FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN O May 24, 2022 c� N M M d C� C R C BOARD OF EDUCATION O a U. Hiroshi Eto, President V 00 Trudy Davis, Vice President and WIAA Representative N Luckisha Phillips, Legislative Representative M Dr. Jennifer Jones o N Quentin Morris r •L 0 0 V SUPERINTENDENT Dr. Dani Pfeiffer 2- as as a_ c 0 Prepared by: Jeri Carlson, Chief Finance & Operations Officer, Interim E Sally McLean, Facilitator Jennifer Thomas, Student& Demographic Forecaster a c as Y c c E a cc a a E 0 U c d E t c� to Q Packet Pg. 111 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS W Q. 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Q INTRODUCTION 2-3 c ° SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN L O Introduction 4 co N Inventory of Educational Facilities 5 Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities 6 Needs Forecast-Existing Facilities 7 c Needs Forecast-New Facilities 8 Six Year Finance Plan 9 O SECTION 2 MAPS U. V 00 Introduction 10 N Map—City and County Jurisdictions 11 N 0 N SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION r L Introduction 12 0 Building Capacities 13-15 c Portable Locations 16-17 ° Student Forecast 18-20 in ° SECTION 4 KING COUNTY, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, AND CITY OF KENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Introduction 21 Capacity Summaries 22-26 Impact Fee Calculations 27 cc Six Year Finance Plan 28-29 3 Student Generation Rates 30 3 Impact Fee Changes from 2022 to 2023 31 a c as Y c c E a cc a a E 0 U c d E t c� to Q 1 Packet Pg. 112 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION Q. 0 Q In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act(SHB) 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, City of Kent Ordinance No.4278 effective June 2018, revised December 2021, O and the City of Auburn Ordinance No. 5078 effective 1998, Federal Way Public Schools has N updated its Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2022. M as This plan is scheduled to be submitted for consideration to each of the jurisdictions located c with the Federal Way Public Schools' service area: King County, the City of Kent, City of Federal Way and the City of Auburn and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each 0 O jurisdiction by reference. This plan is requested to be included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not v adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The City of Des Moines collects school impact fees as 00 part of the SEPA process. Discussions with the City of Milton to adopt an ordinance for school N impact fees for parcels located within the Federal Way School District's service area is in N process. 0N �n r The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted o and recommended to the King County Council for Urban Growth Area Line Maps with c designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and in actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing,jobs, services, culture, and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. as This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended cc to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim 3 plans consistent with Board policies or management need. 3 Q During the 2016-17 school year the District formed a 100 member Facilities Planning Committee consisting of parents, community members and staff. The Committee was tasked Y with developing a recommendation to the Superintendent regarding Phase 2 of the District's plan for school construction, remodeling, and/or modernization for voter consideration in E November 2017. The voters passed this $450M bond authorization with a 62%YES vote reflecting a commitment to invest in the modernization of our infrastructure. Through the E committee's work a determination was made to rebuild Thomas Jefferson High School, Illahee Middle School, Evergreen Middle School, Lake Grove Elementary, Mirror Lake a Elementary, Olympic View Elementary, Star Lake Elementary, and Wildwood Elementary. 0 In addition to the school projects, the committee included a plan to modernize Memorial 0 Stadium, which currently supports athletic activities for all schools. The rebuilding of the schools will create additional capacity for students at the elementary and high school levels. E 0 Q 2 Packet Pg. 113 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION, continued W 0. 0 The District continues to monitor factors that may have an impact on enrollment and capacity Q at our schools, including new single-family and multi-family residential developments and any impacts due to the COVID-19 stay home order. In accordance with the McCleary decision, the State has provided funding to reduce K-3 class size to 17 and 4-12 class size to 25. Beginning in 2019-20 the legislature expects compliance with this funding adding O pressure to the need for elementary capacity. In response to this need the district has N acquired a commercial building to renovate into classrooms to provide permanent additional capacity. as c As a result of the combination of recently added new capacity in the District and lower enrollment due to COVID-19 (and associated lower enrollment projections), the 2023 Capital 0 O Facilities Plan reflects no unhoused scholars by the end of the six year planning period. As such, this year's CFP does not include a school impact fee request. However, it is important v to note that the Fall 2022 kindergarten registrations at the time of this writing is on track to 00 be the highest it has ever been. The District plans to closely monitor enrollment and N associated needs and reserves the right to amend the 2023 CFP and impact fee calculation as N appropriate. N �n r House Bill 1356 prompted school districts across the state, including Federal Way Public Schools, to reflect and consider the appropriateness of their school mascots. We recognized o the importance of partnership in this process and were fortunate to engage with local tribal c leaders to help us determine what changes needed to happen in our district for schools with names and mascots connected to Native American identities as a result, several of our in schools now have new mascots: • Illahee Middle School Royals • Sacajawea Middle School Nighthawks • Woodmont K-8 Snow Leopards • Evergreen Middle School Grizzlies c L 3 In June 2021, the decision was made to rename Totem Middle School, and we began the a process of identifying the new name of the school. In November 2021, that process concluded when the FWPS Board of Directors approved the scholar-recommended name Y Evergreen Middle School. This process incorporated the voices of scholars, teachers, community members, and local tribal leaders. We are proud to move forward with this new name to help undo the disrespectful use and cultural appropriation of Native American E identity in our community. E a cc a. a E 0 U c d E t c� to Q 3 Packet Pg. 114 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 1 - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN W 0. 0 The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to Q determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. c This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and a expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. A Financial Plan that o shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization listed follows N this. M d C� C R C L Q a U. 0 00 N O N M N O N N r t,1 �L A a 0 0 V cc L d 13 4) U- cc L 3 3 Q C N Y c c E a a a E 0 U c d t c� to Q 4 Packet Pg. 115 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES Q. 0 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (K-5) Adelaide 1635 SW 304t1i St Federal Way 98023 m Brigadoon 3601 SW 336th St Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 298th St Auburn 98001 Enterprise 35101 5'Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Green Gables 32607 47th Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308'h St Auburn 98001 N Lake Grove 303 SW 308" St Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35827 32'Ave S Auburn 98001 Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Rd Federal Way 98003 c Meredith Hill 5830 S 300t1i St Auburn 98001 c Mirror Lake 625 S 314t1i St Federal Way 98003 Nautilus(K-8) 1000 S 289th St Federal Way 98003 Olympic View 2626 SW 327th St Federal Way 98023 U. Panther Lake 34424 1st Ave S Federal Way 98003 V Rainier View 3015 S 368th St Federal Way 98003 0 Sherwood Forest 34600 12th Ave SW Federal Way 98023 N Silver Lake 1310 SW 325th PI Federal Way 98023 c Star Lake 4014 S 270th St Kent 98032 N Sunnycrest 24629 42nd Ave S Kent 98032 r Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320th St Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42'Ave S Auburn 98001 0 Wildwood 2405 S 300th St Federal Way 98003 c Woodmont(K-8) 26454 16th Ave S Des Moines 98198 0 z MIDDLE SCHOOLS (6-8) y Federal Way Public Academy(6-10) 34620 9th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Illahee 36001 1"Ave S Federal Way 98003 ?� Kilo 4400 S 308th St Auburn 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 314th St Federal Way 98023 Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Rd Federal Way 98003 Sequoyah 3450 S 360th ST Auburn 98001 Evergreen 26630 40th Ave S Kent 98032 0 TAF @ Saghalie(6-12) 33914 19th Ave SW Federal Way 98023 3 L HIGH SCHOOLS(9-12) Decatur 2800 SW 320th St Federal Way 98023 Q Federal Way 30611 16th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288th St Auburn 98001 `1 Todd Beamer 35999 16th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Career Academy at Truman 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 ADDITIONAL SCHOOLS Internet Academy(K-12) 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Employment Transition Program(12+) 33250 2l't Ave SW Federal Way 98023 E Federal Way Open Doors 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Former DeVry Property(K-5) 3600 S 344th Way, Federal Way 98001 a a E 0 U c d E t c� to Q 5 Packet Pg. 116 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CURRENT INVENTORY NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Q. 0 Developed Property Q a� Central Kitchen 1214 S 332nd Federal Way 98003 Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308th St Federal Way 98003 Educational Services Center 33330 8th Ave S Federal Way 98003 0 Support Services Center 1211 S 332nd St Federal Way 98003 N M M d Leased Property c c Early Learning Center at Uptown 1066 S 320th St Federal Way 98003 E Square a U. 0 00 N O N Undeveloped Property N O N Site Location r # L 75 SW 360th Street& 3rd Avenue SW—9.2 Acres o 65 S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S—8.8 Acres 60 E of loth Avenue SW - SW 334th& SW 335th Streets - 10.04 Acres y 73 N of SW 320th and east of 451h PL SW—23.45 Acres 71 S 344th Street& 46th Avenue S - 17.47 Acres 82 I st Way S and S 342nd St—Minimal acreage 96 S 308th St and 14th Ave S— .36 Acres c Notes: 0 c L 3 Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. a Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. Y c c E a a a E 0 U c d E t c� to Q 6 Packet Pg. 117 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST -EXISTING FACILITIES Q. 0 < PHASE EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF Q FUNDS As Purchase and Relocate Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is needed Portables Impact Fees. 11 Thomas Jefferson High Replace Existing Building, Voter Approved Capital bond 0` School Increase Capacity co 11 Illahee Middle School Replace Existing Building Voter Approved Capital bond N M 11 Evergreen Middle School Replace Existing Building Voter Approved Capital bond II Lake Grove Elementary Replace Existing Building, Voter Approved Capital bond Increase Capacitycv c II Mark Twain Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD,pending SCAP funding Increase Capacity 0` II Mirror Lake Elementary Replace Existing Building, Voter Approved Capital bond a Increase Capacity U. t� II Olympic View K-8 School Replace Existing Building, Voter Approved Capital bond N Increase Capity N II Star Lake Elementary Replace Existing Building, Voter Approved Capital bond N Increase Capacity G N II Wildwood Elementary Replace Existing Building, Voter Approved Capital bond r Increase Capity •L II Memorial Stadium Replace Existing Facility Voter Approved Capital bond y II DeVry Property Temp Swing School SCAP and K-3 Class size o Increase Ca aci reduction fundin 0 z III Decatur High School Replace Existing Building, TBD y Increase Capacity III Kilo Middle School Replace Existing Building TBD III Sacajawea Middle School Replace Existing Building TBD d Adelaide Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD III m Increase Capacity a_ III Brigadoon Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD r_ Increase Cap ityc L Camelot Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD UI Increase Capacity ' Q III Lake Dolloff Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD Increase Cap ityY III Nautilus K-8 School Replace Existing Building, TBD Increase Capacity m III Twin Lakes Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD E Increase Capacity m III Woodmont K-8 School Replace Existing Building, TBD a Increase Capacity0 0 a As part of the multi-phase modernization and replacement plan, the District intends to E increase capacity for elementary and high school students with expansion at the Thomas c0 Jefferson, Lake Grove, Mirror Lake, Olympic View, Star Lake, and Wildwood sites. c as E 0 Q 7 Packet Pg. 118 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN a� NEEDS FORECAST -ADDITIONAL FACILITIES Q. O Q NEW FACILITY LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS c c No current plans for additional facilities. p N M M N V C R C E L 0 LL U 00 N O N M N O N N r V �L Y N O O t v U) m fC L LL L Q Y c a� c a� E Q c d 0. E O U c m E t U O r Q 8 Packet Pg. 119 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Six Year Finance Plan C) C Secured Funding Sources +. Im F Fees 1 $144&49 CL Load Sale F—& 2 481.779 0 Bond nc -Fvods 3 S125973,394 IC3-M&TAFA nn�l�imo,1 Mures 4 SI2,106,119 School Constructian Aasistamx Pro 5 S33980,652 V TOTAL Projected Rffvelue Sources C Sehaol C—truction Asaistaaoe bra am 6) S79.213.000 'a K-3 Class Size Reductinm 7 S436.000 L Bond Funds 3; SC Q Laced Fund Sales 9 S C Im t Fees 10 S C N TOTAL $79,699,000 M M Actual and Planned Expenditures 11T.t.1 S—ed Funding aced Pmj erted Rerenue $61,a33 3a d NLFI•SCHOOLS T bli6W: Budget 20'1 20'A 2028 20M 2027 20'18 Total j:T4ta1:G of V :wwr$i�an 2022-23 2023-24 20'k20'S 2026-2026 20245r2027 2027-2GZS 2O2S-20.9 2022-2029 R MUDYR*nZ.nTION AND EXPANSION Lake Grove Element 11) SS39 000 htirror Lake Elemen 11) S41 000 Skar Lake Elemeuk 11 :::$39 3p0 so 539 660 500 O LVildmaod Element - 11 :::$44 "OaCt SC S40 000 � 41— , Viem K-8 School11 I::$lk 74:1W S29,376,"I S1750000 $31126.000 I S47200000 d Thomas Jefferson ii School 11 :50144"OD:Ct S17745000 $17745.000 S125'00000 LPL Ever —h'fiddle School 11 :::96f 71]3Q0 S C S66 711 (� EI.A—hSdd School 11) 39.CS--.000 S59843000 S14874044 S79.793,CCC S&2000000 O h3emorial3kadium 11 ;:;:`'9?]4]jq j29.610.000 529.61C.000 S29 00000 N SC S0 O 0 so N M S1T1 AC UISMON N O Former DV -IFS 24 12 $1 421-40 $1 421 000 Sl 423 040 Sl 4 54 Sl 423 750 si,422,2joisi,42TTor 39,97355 500 N fn TLMPORARF FACII.ITILS t� Portahl- 13 SO TOTAL 3376^69 587'37 S0,014,000 SL'93 000 $1 23^ $1 23 750 $1 32^ $1 22 750 S168135 . y NOTES- Q 1.These fees are currently being held in a King County,City of Federal Way,City of Auburn,and City of Kent impact fee account,and will be _ available for use by the District for system improvements.This is year end balance on 12131121. 0 2.This is year end balance on 12131121. 0 3.This is the 12131121 balance of bond Funds and capital levy funds.This figure includes interest earnings. V 4.This represents the K3-CSR revnue received but not spent as of 1213V2021. 5.This represents the balance of SCAP Funding as of 1213V2021 6.This is anticipated SCAP for the future projects authorized by the voters in 2017. 7.This is a secured K-3 Class size reduction grant. 8.In November 2017,the District passed a$450M bond measure.The amount included in the Finance plan is For projects that will create additional capacity.Only the costs associated with increasing capacity are included in school impact fee calculations. Seepagexxx L N 9.There are no projected sale of surplus properties. 'a 10.In this current plan,there are no projected impact fees. 11.Project budgets are updated as of December 2021.Budgets For Illahee Middle School,Olympic View K-8,and Memorial Stadium budgets are still being updated. LIL Evergreen middle School,Illahee Middle School,Olympic View K-8,Memorial Stadium,and DeVry 12.A former private university campus located in Federal Way was purchased in 2019 to provide up to 43 additional permanent elementary classrooms.Prior to creating new permanent capcity this location will be used (� as a temporary housing.These costs are excluded from impact fee calculations. 0 13.These Fees represent the cost of purchasing and installing new portables.The portable expenditure in future years may replace existing portables that are not functional. L These may not increase capacity and are not included in the capacity summary. 0 7 a C N Y c c E a FL a E 0 U c d E t c� co r Q 9 Packet Pg. 120 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN c SECTION 2 -MAPS a 0 Federal Way Public Schools has twenty-one elementary schools (grades K-5), two schools with a K-8 grade configuration, six middle school schools (grades 6-8), four high schools c (grades 9-12) and four small secondary schools. The Federal Way Public Academy serves students in grades 6-10. The programs at Open Doors and Career Academy at Truman High 0 School serves students in grades 9-12. In addition to these programs, TAF@Saghalie serves students in grades 6-12 who reside within the service area and the Employment and Transition N Program (ETP) at the Norman Center serves 18-2 1-year-old scholars. as The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that 0 development. School districts are different. If the district does not have permanent facilities a available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries 0 can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. N N It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction N of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the N district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single development. y 0 Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the district and is not taken lightly. It °o is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. y Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. The final map included represents the city and county boundaries which overlap with the district's service areas. a� • City of Algona a_ • City of Auburn cc • City of Des Moines E • City of Federal Way • City of Kent a • City of Milton • Unincorporated King County Y c as c as E a a a E 0 U c d E t c� to Q 10 Packet Pg. 121 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN MAP—CITY AND COUNTY JURISDICTIONS sa. 0 Q m FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 0 Each 5cholar A voice-A dream.A BRIGHT iubure- O N M k• DOS IJ mAoines ;_-- O LL 00 N O Puget Sound M N N 'L � r O ALJL)4111-11 0 L k V rr � L i k 4) i N _ Federal VVay ) LL 3 Algona a) Y King Count E Mi ikon 0. 0 U City and County 0 0.5 1 2 Miles Jurisdictions E FWPS boundaries is 100%Urban Growth Area Q 11 Packet Pg. 122 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN a� c Q. O SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Q as c c Building Capacities - The Education Program O Portable Locations M M Student Forecast—2023 through 2029 c c �a L O U- U 00 N O N M N O N N r V �L Y N O O t v cc L U- L Q Y c a� c a� E Q c d om E O U c m E M U O r Q 12 Packet Pg. 123 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN c BUILDING CAPACITIES a 0 This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity,but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. 0 In general, the District's current target class size provides that the average class size for a N standard classroom for grades K through 3 should be 17 students to comply with current legislation. In grades 4-5 the target is 25 students. For grades 6 to 12 the target class size is 26 students. Classrooms for students with Individualized Education Program(Special Education) needs are calculated at 12 seats per classroom. L 0 Historically, the District has used the OSPI square footage calculation as a baseline for a capacity calculation and made adjustments for specific program needs. The District will U. c� continue to use this calculation for determining capacity at our middle and high schools. N However, for elementary school capacity will be calculated based on the number of N classroom spaces and the number of students assigned to each classroom. N 0 N N r t,1 Class Size FWPS Historical HB2661/SHB2776 Square Footage Guidelines "Standard of Service" Enacted Law Guideline o Kindergarten 18.9 17 25-28 6 Grades 1-2 18.9 17 25-28 0 Grade 3 18.9 17 28 y Grades 4-5 25 25 28 L d For the purposes of determining student capacity at individual schools, the following list clarifies adjustments to classroom spaces and the OSPI calculation. 0 c Special Education Resource Rooms: Each middle school requires the use of a standard classroom(s) for special education students a requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. as Y English as a Second Language Programs: Each middle school and high school requires the use of a standard classroom for students learning English as a second language. E c as Middle School Computer Labs: a Each middle school has computer labs, except Evergreen Middle School. Wireless access has been installed at all secondary schools. If additional classroom space is needed, these a. 0. computer labs may be converted to mobile carts. E 0 U c d E t c� to Q 13 Packet Pg. 124 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN c BUILDING CAPACITIES, continued a 0 High School Career Development and Learning Center (Resource) Room: Q as Each high school provides special education resource room and career c development classrooms for students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. O Preschool/ECEAP: N Our district currently offers preschool programs for both special needs & typically developing students at 9 elementary schools. We also have the ECEAP program at 10 sites (6 elementary schools, 3 high schools, and 1 commercial sites). These programs decrease capacity at those schools. O Alternative Learning Experience: a Federal Way offers students the opportunity to participate in an Alternative v Learning Experience through our Internet Academy. These students have never been N included in the capacity calculation of unhoused students. Due to COVID 19 N implementing school closures the District has had a sharp increase in IA enrollment. c N 1418 Youth Reengagement: Federal Way offers students the opportunity to participate in 1418 Youth y Reengagement Open Doors program. These students are housed at the Truman o campus but are not currently included in the capacity calculation of unhoused 0 students. co L d L 3 3 Q C N Y c c E a a a E 0 U c d E t c� to Q 14 Packet Pg. 125 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN c BUILDING CAPACITIES, continued a 0 ELEMENTARY BUILDING SIIDDLE SCHOOL BUILDING Q PROGRAM CAPACITY PROGR.LM CAPACITY C� C School Name Headcount 'Preschool School Name Headcount Adelaide 353 30 I1lahee 955 Bri adoon 299 30 Kilo 779 O Camelot 277 30 Lakota 786 �p Enterprise 345 15 Saca'awea 694 N M Green Gables 401 Se uo ah 585 Lake Dolloff 400 Evergreen 795 3Lake Grove 600 TAF'Saghalie 598 V C Lakeland 371 Federal Way Public Academy 183 cv Mark Twain 4_10 TOT. L 5,275 Meredith Hill -175 30 O 3MitrorLake 600 *Middle School vera a 727 Nautilus -8 466 d LL Olympic View 353 HIGH SCHOOL BUILDLIG () Panther Lake 347 PROGRAM CAPACITY 00 liauuer'v'iew 405 30 N O Sherwood Forest 390 6 School Name Headcount N Silver Lake 400 Decatur 1243 M N Star Lake 337 Federal Way- 1684 N Sunnycrest 405 Thomas Jefferson 1224 M Twin Lakes 341 30 ToddBeamer 1085 V Vallialla 406 TAF Sa a 155 r 3Wildwood 600 M23 Career Academy at Truman 159 y Woo dmont -8 357Federal Way Public Academy 116 TOTAL 9,258Employment Transition Program 48 G TOTAL 5,714 t V I le ru e-um 17 Ai—era ge 403 2High SchoolArerage 1,309 � L Notes: 'Preschool enrollment reduces capacity for -5 students. 15 preschool students in one classroom. LP r IC L "Federal Way Public Academy,Career Academy at Truman High School and Emplo�r meet Transition Program 'a and TAF A Saghalie for the high school school grade span(9-12)are non-boundary schools_ These schools are not used in the calculate d averages. i Lake Grove and Wlldwood opened January 2021;Mirror Lake is opened September2021 3 3 Q C N Y c c E a a a E 0 U c d E t c� co Q 15 Packet Pg. 126 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN c Q. PORTABLE LOCATIONS -°a Q as The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. c It is not an efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from o year to year. c� N M Portables are used as interim measures to house students when increasing population impacts a school attendance area. Portables may also be required to house students when new or changing programs require additional capacity. They also provide housing for students until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or child care 0 programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables may not be a fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy 0 new portables and surplus these unfit portables. N N With the launch of construction of new schools, a number of portables will be relocated, N decommissioned, or sold. These numbers are not available at this time. Since 2018, the N District has reduced the number of instructional portables by 33 classrooms. •L The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities,used for educational o facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. 0 L d cc L 3 3 Q C N Y c c E a a a E 0 U c d E t c� to Q 16 Packet Pg. 127 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN c PORTABLE LOCATIONS, continued a 0 Q a) PORTABLES LOCATED PORTABLES LOCATED � AT ELEIIENI?iRY SCHOOLS AT HIGH SCHOOLS � mom mom I.ST..{TIOMML I.ST..;TIOMMU I.ST..;TIOMML I.ST..{TIOMML O Adelaide ? 1 Decatur 8 1 M Bri doon 1 Federal Way Camelot 1 Thomas Jefferson Enterprise Todd Beamer 8 ca Greco Cal}leS 1 TOTAL 16 1 Lake Dolloff a 1 Lake Grove ' Lakeland U. a Mark T�T',am � V 00 N Meredith Hill P ORTABLF-S LOCATED N M=.Df Lake T SUPPORT FACUITIES �"� N 'Nautilus N %r-m1mc View. MOT in Panther Lake a TDC 9 Ra=ef view ofmorTAYA M Stiff ood Forest _ _ TOTAL 9 p Silver Lake 1 —p Star Lake 0 z Sunnycrest 6 DISTRICT PORTABLES IN USE FOR ECEAP v T,z�,in Lakes 1 _ ANDIOR HEAD TART y Vallmila a Lh,rns- orest gild;rood M woodmont a. -tea m IMAL al - c PORI iiBLES LOCATED c ATX IIMLE SCHOOLS 3 mom I.ST..{TIOMML I.ST..CTIOMML Q Illahee 1 c Kilo 1 6 Y LakotaCD ' SatA and"ea CD Se uovah 1 1 E EvwEreen � t3:f Sa 'e a E TOTAL 13 6 Q c a a E 0 U c d E t c� to Q 17 Packet Pg. 128 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN c STUDENT FORECAST a 0 Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment Q as projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. c Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected o enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. M M Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students. L Q The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a v stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical N information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not N trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The N district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study N several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades y (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on o birth rates within the district's census tracts and treats these statistics as a cohort for c kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. co The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student � enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. L d In January 2022, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District. The model used to forecast next year's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, assumes market share losses to private schools 0 c (consistent with county-wide average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to 3 net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections. The a long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes in the 5-19 age group for King County. Y c as c as E a a a E 0 U c d E t c� to Q 18 Packet Pg. 129 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN c STUDENT FORECAST, continued a 0 Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of something else (e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some c projected trend for the school-age population over time. The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2029. This o model produces a projection that is between 20,000 and 19,500 when applied to the low, medium, and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning N and is consistent with estimates from various models. as Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied 0 annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they U. project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by 0 Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the N projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington. M N O Near term projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by current N local economic conditions. The District tracks new development from five permitting jurisdictions. Long range planning assumes a student yield from proposed new housing y consistent with historical growth patterns. o 0 0 Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The y Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school district community in the future. as As a result of COVID-19, the District has experienced a significant increase in Internet Ui Academy scholars: c 0 c Elementary Middle High IA Headcount School School School Total Nov-19 12 59 205 276 Q Novm20 159 147 250 556 Nov-21 349 227 342 918 Y Temp Increase 337 168 137 642 c m E c The District's six year enrollment projections show an overall decline in enrollment, and a E decline at each grade level. The COVID-19 pandemic affected enrollment in recent years, as well as increased enrollment in the Internet Academy. The District plans to monitor actual a enrollment growth in the 2022-23 school year to assess the validity of the projections, E particularly post-pandemic. Any changes will be reflected in future updates to this CFP. c0 c as E 0 a 19 Packet Pg. 130 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN c STUDENT FORECAST, continued a O October I Head ['aunt Enrollment History and Projections Q as c lvalendar l r School Year Fl-- Middle School High School Total K-12 CYjdjW 0 201647 10,472 5,165 6,992 22,629 INS 201745 10,449 5,229 6_S41 22,519 N 1--019 2019-19 10,191 5,151 6.966 22,335 -02% M 1--020 2019-20 9,965 5,366 63S0 22,111 -1.046 d 1-021 2020-21 9,357 5,326 6,690 21,363 -3_S% -022 2021-22 9,412 5,097 6,755 21,2" -0_Si6 ''-023 P3632-23 9,0S1 4,630 6,46? 20,199 -S_6% L 1-024 P2023-39 9,01S 4,611 6,?{- 20,063 49¢6 0 -025 P3039-3S 3,961 4,584 6,Vv 19,943 46% 1 1--026 P303S-36 8,907 9,SS6 6,360 19,323 -0.6% LL -027 P2026-27 8,845 4,S24 6,316 19,685 -0.736 V 00 1--028 P202728 6,8S3 9,S29 6,322 19,704 03% c 1--029 P3028-_: 8,907 9,SS6 6,360 19,323 0.6% N E?emeiubrrK-S lfi&bSchool 6-8 High Schad9-12 N lmlwk Opan Doors andIrnerm Aca&?,. N N r Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast L 23:444 y 22:544 p O t 22.444 V 21'.500 21.000 N 13 O LL 20.544 R 20:000 i 3 19,500 Q c 19,000 N Y 5chod Year C O E a a a E O U c d E t c� to Q 20 Packet Pg. 131 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN a� c Q. SECTION 4 — KING COUNTY, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, AND CITY OF KENT -°a IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Q as c c Capacity Summaries 0 Site & Construction Costs Allocations M M Student Generation Rates c c Impact Fee Calculations =a 0 Reference to Impact Fee Calculations U 00 N O N M N O N N r V �L Y N O O t v fC L U- L Q Y c a� c a� E Q c d om E O U c m E M U O r Q 21 Packet Pg. 132 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN c CAPACITY SUMMARIES a 0 All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and High Schools c The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information, Portable Capacity information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements 0 for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary W facilities or interim measures. N M M The District has recently adjusted its capacity calculation method for Elementary schools to better show capacity needed to comply with the K-3 Class Size Reduction. This adjustment is also shown in the portable capacity calculation. In order to allow for flexibility in portable usage the District will use an average class size calculation of 21 for each Elementary portable 0 and an average class size of 25 for each Middle and High School portable. a 0 The information is organized with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating N capacity vs. number of students at elementary, middle school, and high school levels M individually. N N The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year. y 0 0 0 z L d cc L 3 3 Q C N Y c c E a a a E 0 U c d E t c� to Q 22 Packet Pg. 133 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued W a O Capacity Summary-All Grades Q as c c Budget -- Projected-- Calendar Year 2023 2024 2025 20M 2027 2028 20D O C.4PACrrY School Year 2022r23 2023-24 2023-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2029-29 cp BUILDING PROGRAM M HEADCOUNTCAPACM 20.y42 20.370 2%370 20,370 20,982 20,982 20,982 d . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . c� Add Capacity .:: :l2$. . . .#k. . . . . b: : : : :bt : : : : : :41: : : : : cv C Adjusted Program Headcount Ca achy 1 20,370 120,370 120,370 20,Q82 20,982 20,982 20,982 E O FNROLLWNTLL d Basic Headcount Enrollment 20,144 2.0,063 19,943 19,823 19,685 19,704 19,823 V Internet Academy Headcount Enrollment) (255) P55) (255) (255) (255) (255) (255) N Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 19,999 19,808 19,688 19,568 19,430 19,"9 19,568 N M N SLIZFLUS OR 015MOUSEII) N PROGRAM FIE CAPACITY 481 562 682 1,414 1,552 1,533 1,4 44 y r tt L RELOCATABLE CAPACITY y Current Portable Cap acit. 1,6S 5 1,695 1,643 1,593 1,593 1,593 1,593 C O Add'Subtract Portable Cap acity. : :: f). . . . :: :: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Adjusted Portable Capachy 1_685 1_6-3 1 1,J93 1 1,593 1,593 1,J93 -3_ SLRFLUS OR(UNHOt1 SED) PROGRAM AND REL OCATAME C.4PACTIY 2,166 2,2U5 2,275 3,007 3.115 3.126 3.007 li C NOTT S: to C L l Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities.This represents historic enrollment. O a C N Y c c E a a a E O U c d E t c� to Q 23 Packet Pg. 134 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued a, c Capacity Summary Elementary Schools -0a0 Q as Budget -- eded-- Calendarlear 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2029 2029 CAPACITY Scho01 Yeaf 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-29 2029-29 BUILDING PROGRAM O HEAD COUNT CAPACTFY 9,016 9.144 9,144 9,1d4 9,756 9,156 9,756 N AdcUSubtract capacity total 128 0 0 612 0 0 0 Add capacity aci at': d S'trn-L<aku C� c c Ohm riex,K-8 : :x�: : : : : : : : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .:. . . . . .: :. L Adjusted Pm Headcount Capacity 9,144 9,144 9,144 9,756 9,756 9,756 9,756 O ENROLLMENT LL LL Ba--icHeadcountEnrollment 9.051 9,015 5961 5907 8.945 S_853 8-907 V 00 sitemetAcadem5 Headcount 121 (2A) (2)0} (20) N Basic Headcount Enrollment without Internet Academ 9,031 S 995 S 941 S,S87 3.325 S7S33 S.S37 N M N SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) N PROGRAMCAPACTTY 113 149 203 969 931 923 569 N r t� RELOCATABLE CAPACITY'- L r Current Portable Capacity 931 931 889 889 889 889 889 y Add'Subtract portable capacity- 0 (42) 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Add portable capacity at: O Subtract portable capacity at: t V Lake Graw _1lir7 nr Lake S:m Lemke Ii rlriwnnrl — } L �iy4'rrr�fC &44`�i ::: d3s�: d . . . . . . . . . Adjusted Portable Capacity 931 889 I 889 889 I EL9 S89 I S89 LL SGRPLCS OR(UNHOUSED) C PROGRA--1 iiNDRELOCATABLE R C4PACTTY 1,#" 1,038 1,092 1,758 1,820 1,812 1,759 3 NOTES: Q I Capacity increases are projected based on a design to accommodate 525 students-IncrYasedcapacityiscurrentiv stated asthe difference between current calculated capacity and the projected design.In order to reduce elementary class size,Devey capacity is N calculated at 17 scholars per classroom. Y 2 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities.This represents historic O enrollment. E 3 Relocatable Capacirvis based on the number ofportables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily O house students until permanent facilities are available.This is a calculated number only based on class sue capacity of 2l.The actual E number of p ortable s that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. Q C cc a M E O U c d E t c� co Q 24 Packet Pg. 135 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN c a CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued -°a Q as Capacity Summary—Middle Schools c L Budget -- Projected-- 0 Calendar Yeaj 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 CAPACITY School Year 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 M BUILDING PROGRAM HEAD COLT'T CAPACITY 5275 5275 5275 5275 5,275 5,275 5,275 d .add Subtract capacity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Add capacity at: Totem L Illahee 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . .. .. . . . . ... ... . . . . ..... . . . . .. .. . . . . ... ... . . . . .. .. . . . . .. Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5275 5275 5,275 5,275 1 5275 5275 5275 fL LL 0 E-NROLI-% ENT 00 Basic Headcount Enrollment 4,630 4,611 4,584 4,556 4,524 4,529 4,556 N Internet Academy' (55) (55) (=Sj (55) (55) (55) (55) M Basic Enrollment zrithout Internet Academy 4,575 4,556 4,529 4,501 4,469 4,474 4,501 p N to SURPLUS OR(UN-HOUSED) v PROGRAM CAPACITY 700 719 746 774 SM SDI 774 r rn t] RELOCATABLE CAPACITY' O t Current Portable Capacity ==S ==S 338 288 288 288 288 v Add-Subtract portable capacity 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 Everga'-een Yormerly Totem)Mddle,Schaal Sacajawea Middle School Illahee fiddle School f Gl d Adjusted Portable Capacity 1 338 338 288 1 288 288 288 288 LL SURPLUS OR(U-NHOtiSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATA_BLE � CAPACITY 1,038 1,057 1,034 1,062 1,094 1,089 1,062 3 3 NOTES: Q 1 Totem and Illahee Nliddle Schools currently have ca achy°for 800& 850 students respectively, _ p _ p ely,so no new capacity is � anticipated with the rebuild of these older buildings- 2 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. This represents historic enrollment_ E 3 Relocatable Capacity-is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to � temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available.This is a calculated number only based on class size Q capacity of 25_ The actual number of portables that wM be used v4�M be based on actual student population needs_ a M E 0 U c d E t c� co Q 25 Packet Pg. 136 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN c a CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued -0 Q Capacity Summary—High Schools c �a L Budget -- Projected-- O Calendar Yem 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 �p CAPACITY School Year 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 N M BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOLNrT CAPACTIY 5�951 5.951 5.951 5,951 5,951 5,951 5,951 v Add-Subtract capacity 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 C cv C 4 Thomas.Ie e1 son� h School � g L 0 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5.951 5,951 5,951 5�51 5�51 5�51 5,951 d LL 0 ENROLLMENT 00 Basic Headcount Enrollment 6,463 6,437 6,399 6,360 6,316 6,322 360 N 6t Internet Academvl (180) (180) (180) (180) (180) (180) (180) A Basic Ed without Internet Academi 6,283 6,257 6,219 6,180 6,136 6,142 6,180 cm 0 N to SURPLUS OR(UNHOti SED) j PROGRAM CAPACITY (332) (306) (268) (229) (185) (191) RELOCATABLE CAPACTTYl O t Current Portable Capacity 416 416 416 416 416 416 416 y Add.-Subtract portable capacity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cv Thomas Je er son High School 4 L . . . . d Adjusted Portable Capacity 416 416 416 416 416 416 416 13 LL SURPLUS OR(UN-HOUSED) � PROGRAM A2�D RELOCATABLE C CAPACTTYa 84 110 148 187 231 225 187 3 3 NOTES: Q 1 Internet Academ% students are included in projections but do not require 5L time use of school facilities.This represents Y historic enrollment. 2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrati4 a techniques which can be used to temporarily-house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only based on class size E capacity of 25.The actual number of portables that z nll be used-�i-M be based on actual student population needs. 3 Capacity for unhoused students well be accommodated sAith traveling teachers and no planning time in some classrooms. E - a cc a M E 0 U c d E t c� co Q 26 Packet Pg. 137 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN c IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS a 0 Single and Multi-Family Residences c Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. o To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substantially M adopted by the City of Auburn, Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that district. O Impact Fee Calculation LL When applicable, the CFP includes variables for the calculation of the Impact Fee for single o family and multi-family units based on King County Code 2 1 A and the Growth Management N Act. As noted above, due to declining enrollment, the CFP does not include an impact fee c calculation or recommendation. Future updates to the CFP may include impact fees. N �n r •L Plan Year 2022 Plan Year 2023 6 0 Single Family Units $3,243 $0 0 Multi-Family Units $16,003 $0 Mixed-Use Residential $8,001 $0 L Impact Fee Calculation-King County Code 2 1 A a_ c 0 c L 3 3 a d Y c c E a a a E 0 U c d E 'In accordance with the City of Federal Way Ordinance No.95-249. c� Q 27 Packet Pg. 138 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN c SIX YEAR FINANCE PLAN a 0 SCHOOL ACQUISITION COST a a� The district purchased the former Devey Technical School building to house displaced scholars during school construction then will provide permanent capacity for Early Childhood Education programs. o c� N SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COST M With voter approval of the $450,000,000 bond package, design work is underway for six of the approved projects. Anticipated construction budgets (based on the Guaranteed Maximum Price or GMP)have been updated to reflect the final construction contracts,plus amendments. In addition, a credit for the cost of new construction is incorporated to 0` recognize the K-3 Class Size Reduction Grant obtained by Federal Way Public Schools. a The following table outlines the facility cost included in the impact fee calculation: 0 00 N Elementary Lake Mirror Elementary N Schools Grove Lake Star Lake Wildwood TOTAL N 0 Permanent 353 404 387 472 1616 Capacityr New Capacity 600 600 525 600 2325 y Increased o Ca acit as % 43.9% 6 0 GMP $31.475,730 $33,007,391 $30,163,111 $32,609,529 $127,255,761 y Proportionate >, Share $ 55,865,279 cc K-3 Class Size Credit ($ 11,598,151) Net a- u_ Proportionate $ 44,267,128 cc Share c L 3 Two additional projects are within this horizon, but not yet included—Olympic View K-8 a and Mark Twain Elementary. These costs will be incorporated into future Capital Facilities Plans. Current Middle School capacity calculations do not reflect unhoused students, so no Y costs associated with Illahee Middle School or Evergreen Middle School are included. c a� E c a� E a a a E 0 U c d E t c� to a 28 Packet Pg. 139 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN c Consistent with the capacity calculations described earlier, the District uses the OSPI square a footage calculation for determining capacity at our secondary schools. Based on this -°a methodology, the following construction costs for Thomas Jefferson High School are allocated as the proportionate share: c c �a L 0 N M Square Footage Capacity at approx. 131 s . ft. Current: 179,119 1378 Planned: 210,000 1600 Increased Capacity 237 Increase as % 16.11% GMP $94,176,828 U. Proportionate Share $15,171,887 V 00 N O The District will use the above formulas created as a base for future Capital Facilities Plans M during the life of the current bond authorization. The capacity of these schools may vary N from year to year as programs are added or changed and construction cost may increase over time. r L FACILITIES CAPACITY Permanent Facility Capacity: 0 Changes to the Building Program Capacities calculation are found on page 15. y Capacity Summaries: The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current M_ buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 22-26. Student Generation Factor Analysis: cc Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single-family units and multi-family units. The factors used in the 2023 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors a from single-family units and multi-family units that were constructed in the c District in the last five (5)years and can be found on the next page Y Temporary Facility Cost: c The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on pages 16 and 17. a cc a. a E 0 U c d E t c� to Q 29 Packet Pg. 140 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN U- STUDENT GENERATION RATES U New Construction in Prior 5 Years N O N M N O N N V Single Family Student Generation N Number of Number of Number of Number of Elementary Middle School High School Total Single Family Elementary Middle School High School Student Student Student Student O O DEVELOPMENT Dwellings Students Students Students Factor Factor Factor Factor t 19-Pacific Hei hts 63 11 3 3 0.0476 0.0000 0.0000 0.0476 v 19-Havenwood Park 71 11 3 4 0.0635 0.0159 0.0317 0.0986 18-Retreat Meadows 56 4 1 5 0.1270 0.1429 0.1746 0.5000 to 18-W ncrest11 41 15 0 1 0.0952 0.0000 0.0159 0.1707 18-Soun&ew Manor 21 0 0 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i Tota 1 252 41 7 13 Student Generation" 0.1627 0.0278 0.0516 0.2421 O LL Multi-Family Student Generation-City of Federal Way C Number of Number of Number of Number of Elementary Middle School High School Total L 3 Multi Family Elementary Middle School High School Student Student Student Student 3 DEVELOPMENT Dwellings Students Students Students Factor Factor Factor Factor Q 21-Watermark 221 114 70 46 0.5158 0.3167 02081 1.0407 Total 221 114 70 46 a� Student Generation" 0.5158 0.3167 0.2081 1.0407 Y *Student Generation rate is based on totals. d E c d E Q C R a a E 0 U r c a� E t c� R r a 30 Packet Pg. 141 4.F.a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN c Item From/To Comment Q. 0 Q Percent of Permanent Facilities 95.860/6 to 96_95% Report#3 OSPI c Percent Temporary Facilities 4241%to 3.05% Updated portable inventory :a L O Average Cost of Portable &169579 to 128,646 Updated 5-yr rolling average of Classrooms portables purchased and placed NN, by 2018_ d Construction Cost Allocation S23822 to$246.83 Change effective July 2021 L State Match 65.59/D to 62.95% Change effective July 2021 O a LL 0 Average Assessed Value Per Ding County Assessor's Office cOO.i SFR- 378,910 to$4d3,835 Single-family residences N N FR- 143,630 to$412,362 Apartments c N Capital Bond Interest Rate 2.441%to 2.45% Market Rate L Property- Tax Levy Rate Sim84 to$145 King Count, Treasury Division p 0 0 Student Generation Factors Updated Housing Inventory Ingle-Family Nofa:.Sirrdenr ganarnrion fisfors jor-our- y singla fnm b-rrreils ma b wad ore new Elementary 138 to .1b27 dwa?opmanfs comMTwfad irrrlern flea Drsfrrcf Middle School to an 6r flea hwyAw(s).�aws prim-ro flea dma of to High School 060 to . Slb flea J6aa cta?cwat"n_ 0 Multi-Fancily Sfrrdanf ganaradonfxaeim-ifoa nre mrdh- �y .S15S . f�.rinds mw bm-ad tmni'&nw?opmanfs Elementary 3946 to consrrvcfad ii'iAM flea Disrricr orw ilea I= � Middle School _2161 to 1167 ffl-a(5)3'aws prior I*flea dnfa of fha fte i High School 1067 to .2i181 calcv��ion_ 3 Impact Fee Q SFR- $1,845 to$0 SFR based on the updated calculation MFR $15,073 to$0 MER based on the updated calculation Y City-of Federal W-ay NHT-4+Bedroom Unit 0°D Discount ,YiF'R 3+Bedroom Unit 12.5%Discount � NHT-2+Bedroom Uril31.2°D Disccount NiFR 1+Bedroom Unil 50°a Discount Q NiFR: Studio Unit 62.5%Discount � a 0. City of Dent, per Ordinance-No 4278, rev 12121 E SFR- 1,845 to" UT based m the updated calculation U X FR - 9,450 to 1 FR ma=um per City of Kent Ordinance No.4279,rev 12.'21 E t c� Q 31 Packet Pg. 142 4.F.a c Auburn School District No. 408 0 0 Q L 0 N M • O V C O 0 d • • • U N 00 Pt n N M N O N w r V �L 2022 through 2028 N 0 0 O U) L Q� LL Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors L June 27, 2022 a Y c a� c d SCHOOL DISTRICT d a ENGAGE EDUCATE EMPOWER E O U c E t c.� r Q Packet Pg. 143 4.F.a a� c :r Q. 0 V A B U R At SCHOOL DISTRICT o ENGAGE - EDUCATE - EMPOWER M M N V 915 Fourth Street SE 0 c Auburn, Washington 98002 0 U- (253) 931-4900 N 0 N M Serving Students in: N N r City of Auburn N City of Algona o 0 City of Kent U) City of Pacif c City of Black Diamond L Unincorporated King County c 0 Board of Directors Tracy Arnold Q Arlista Holman Y Sheilia McLaughlin Laura Theimer E a a Dr. Alan Spicciati, Superintendent 0 0 U c m E t U r Q Packet Pg. 144 4.F.a Capital Facilities Plan c Q. 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I 0 Executive Summary Page 3 N M M SECTION 11 Enrollment Projections and Student Generation Factors Page 8 L 0 SECTION III a Standard of Service Page 18 U 00 N O SECTION IV M N Inventory of Facilities Page 25 N N r V SECTION V y Pupil Capacity Page 29 0 0 SECTION VI n, Capital Construction Plan Page 33 3.1 SECTION VI a a� Impact Fees Page 35 U- c 0 c L Q Y c a� E c a� E Q c d 0. E 0 U c m E M U r Q Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 145 4.F.a Capital Facilities Plan c Q. 0 a m SECTION I - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY L 0 This six-year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Auburn School District (the "District") as the District's principal planning M document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities c served by the District. This Plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2022. ° a U_ This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by N the District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of N the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic long-range o Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into y account a longer or a shorter time period; other factors and trends in the use •2 of facilities; and other needs of the District as may be required. However, any o such plan or plans will be consistent with this six-year Capital Facilities Plan. c To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and within the Cities of Auburn, Black Diamond and Kent; the King County Council, the City of Auburn, the City of Black Diamond, and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction's respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of 0 Algona and Pacif c, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt i school impact fee ordinances. 3 a Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act and the local Y ordinances, this Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in Z the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. The Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain E the District's current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of ca Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those a a guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the District. The E Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the District to clef ne its standard of service based on the District's specif c needs. E U a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 146 4.F.a Capital Facilities Plan c Q. 0 In general, the District's current standard provides that class size for grades K-3 should not exceed 17 students and class size for grades 4-5 should not exceed 27 students. When averaged over the six elementary school grades, this computes to 20.33 students per classroom. Class size for grade 6 should not exceed 27 students and class size for grades 7 and 8 should not exceed N 28.53 students. When averaged over the three middle school grades, this computes to 28.02 students per classroom. Class size for 9-12 should not exceed 28.74 students, with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers. Decisions by current legislative actions may create the need for additional o classrooms. (See Section III for more specif c information.) a U- U 00 The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard o N of service and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional N classrooms. The District's 2021-22 capacity was 17,082. The actual number of N individual students was 16,880 as of October 1, 2021. (See Section V for more U specif c information.) y 0 0 The Capital Construction Plan shown in Section VI addresses the additions 0 and proposed modernization to the District's existing facilities. The plan includes the ongoing replacement offve elementary schools and one middle school, construction of two new elementary schools and one new middle school, and acquisition of future school sites to accommodate growth. The new facilities are required to meet the projected elementary school class size reductions mandated by the State of Washington and student population increases generated by the large development areas within the Auburn School District. Three areas that have signif cant impact on the school district a are the Lakeland South, Lea Hill, and the north valley areas of the district. There are also other development pockets that impact the District. Y In the spring of 2016, the Board determined to move forward with the E replacement of six schools and the construction of two new elementary schools. The project was placed before the voters in November 2016 and the a bond passed at 62.83%. The f rst of the projects, the replacement of Olympic a Middle School, started construction in May 2018 and opened in Fall 2019. The 0. district's new elementary, Bowman Creek Elementary, started construction in 0 May 2019 and opened in August 2020. Construction for replacement of Dick E U a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 147 4.F.a Capital Facilities Plan c Q. 0 Scobee Elementary School started in June 2019 and the school opened in August 2020. Construction of Willow Crest Elementary School and construction of the replacement Pioneer Elementary School started May 2020 and both opened in August 2021. For the 2021-22 school year, Willow Crest Elementary served as the temporary home for Lea Hill Elementary M School which started the replacement construction process in May 2021 and will open in August 2022. Construction for replacement of Chinook Elementary School started in May 2021 and will open in August 2022 as well. Construction for replacement of Terminal Park Elementary School will begin o in May 2022 and is scheduled to open in August 2023. a U_ U 00 The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of o N Auburn, City of Black Diamond and City of Kent provide for the assessment of N impact fees to assist in meeting some of the f scal impacts incurred by a N district experiencing growth and development. Section VII sets forth the U proposed school impact fees for single family and multi-family dwelling units. y The student generation factors have been developed using the students who 0 actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and 0 multi-family developments constructed in the last f ve years. The method of collecting the data is with the use of GIS mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County GIS, data from Davis Demographics and integration of the mapping with student data from the District's student data system. This method gives the District actual student generation numbers for each grade span for identif ed developments. L Q Y c a� E c a� E Q c d 0. E 0 U c m E t U r Q Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 148 4.F.a Capital Facilities Plan c Q. 0 Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2021 Capital Facilities Plan that are a part of the 2022 Plan. The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference. L O SECTION I Executive Summary M A. Updated to reflect new information within the Plan. B. Summary level list of changes from previous year. 0 c SECTION II L Enrollment Projections and Student Generation Factors ° A. Updated projections. See Section II &Appendices A.1. U_ U 00 SECTION III N 0 Standard of Service M A. Updated to reflect the current number of classrooms allocated to N non-standard classroom uses. U L SECTION IV n Inventory of Facilities A. Add 2 portables at Auburn High School 0 B. Add 2 portables at Auburn Mountainview High School U) C. Add 2 portables at Auburn Riverside High School D. Add 1 portable at Washington Elementary School E. Remove 7 portables from Terminal Park Elementary School a� Section V Pupil Capacity A. The 7 portables to be relocated in July 2022 are needed to accommodate enrollment increases. 3 a Y c a� E c a� E Q c d 0. E 0 U c m E t U r Q Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 149 4.F.a Capital Facilities Plan c sa. 0 Impact Fees CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2027 TO 2022 c 0 DATA ELEMENTS CFP 2021 CFP 2022 EXPLANATION Student Generation Consistent with King County Ordinance Factors 11621, Student Generation Factors are Single Family calculated by the school district based on N Elementar 0.2500 0.3010 district records of average actual student Middle School 0.1310 0.1460 generation rates for new developments m High School 0.1520 0.1550 constructed over the last f ve years. Multi-Family c Elementary 0.4330 0.3920 `a Middle School 0.1850 0.1350 O High School 0.1750 0.1530 a LL U School Construction 00 N Costs G N Middle School $112,000,000 $134,320,000 From new school construction cost N estimates in April 2022. c N N Site Acquisition Costs Updated estimate based on 10% annual Cost per Acre $444,771 $489,248 inflation. w Area Cost Allowance Updated to current OSPI schedule. (May Boeckh Index $238.22 $246.83 022) °o t Updated to current OSPI schedule (May (j Match % - State 62.87% 63.83% 2022) Match % - District 37.13% 36.17% Computed cc District Average AV W Single Family $402,640 $458,409 Updated from March 2022 King County 0 Dept. of Assessments data. LL c Multi-Famil $197,141 $223,737 Updated from March 2022 King County c Dept. of Assessments data using average V for apartments and condominiums. a Debt Sery Tax Rate $2.21 $2.13 Current Fiscal Year Y GO Bond Int Rate 2.44% 2.45% Current Rate c (Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-14) E c a� E Q c 0 a a E 0 U c m E t U r Q Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 150 4.F.a Capital Facilities Plan c Q. 0 Q m SECTION II - ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS AND STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS L 0 N M Student Enrollment Projections Projection techniques give consideration to historical and current data as a basis for forecasting the future. In addition, certain assumptions must be made about the variables in the data being used. Forecasting can be clef ned as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future or from the � known to the unknown. N 0 N The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, N psychological, economic, and political factors that are present in any N demographic analysis and projection. An example of this is with the COVID-19 U L pandemic. The logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today and will be in the 0 future. It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data 0 over time. The basis of enrollment projections in the Auburn School District has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group of students in a grade level as it progresses through time. This analysis uses historical U- information to develop averages and project the averages forward. If all students in one grade level progress to the next, the cohort number would be 1.00. If fewer students from the group progress the number will be less than 1. ; The district has used this method with varying years of history (3 years, 6 Q years, 10 years and 13 years) as well as weighted factors to study several Y projections. c The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact. This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic being used to Q calculate future projections. Monitoring deviation is critical to the viability and a creditably of the projections derived by these techniques. 0. 0 U c m E t U r Q Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 151 4.F.a Capital Facilities Plan a u- U 00 Overview of 2022-23 Enrollment Projections N M N 40 Table 1 shows historical enrollment for the October 1 count in the Auburn School District over the past 20 N years. The data shows overall average growth over the recent 10 years is 1.59%. It is important to note this average includes a 4.22% decrease in October 2020 enrollment due to the COVID pandemic. y 'c TABLE 1 Historical Enrollment:October 1 Actuals, K-12 (No PS/OD/GA) Source:OSPI 1251H t GRADE 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 to KDG 905 921 892 955 940 995 998 1032 1010 1029 1098 1170 1232 1198 1237 1261 1271 1291 1038 1227 1 900 982 960 963 1012 995 1014 1033 1066 1068 1089 1188 1219 1279 1210 1276 1290 1314 1236 1185 �: 76 2 961 909 992 963 1001 1019 1024 998 1016 1097 1083 1124 1196 1289 1300 1251 1311 1295 1243 1249 m 3 940 996 918 1002 1031 997 1048 993 1013 996 1111 1125 1136 1232 1317 1328 1275 1320 1243 1264 LL 4 � 973 947 1016 939 1049 1057 1045 1073 1024 1022 1038 1123 1156 1170 1237 1328 1378 1316 1257 1255 M c 5 1062 1018 956 1065 998 1077 1070 1030 1079 1017 1070 1075 1122 1172 1199 1269 1345 1361 1294 1251 6 � 1104 1111 1020 1004 1061 1008 1096 1040 1041 1063 1041 1076 1059 1116 1152 1207 1275 1337 1306 1233 Q r 7 1021 1131 1124 1028 1014 1057 1034 1125 1060 1032 1086 1072 1091 1099 1132 1194 1232 1295 1319 1304 Y 8 1026 1052 1130 1137 1069 1033 1076 1031 1112 1046 1018 1116 1088 1136 1108 1183 1213 1236 1264 1312 +, c 8 1432 1464 1459 1379 1372 1337 1257 1245 1221 1273 1200 1159 1275 1229 1261 1257 1372 1399 1351 1386 E 10 1233 1246 1260 1383 1400 1367 1341 1277 1238 1168 1278 1229 1169 1316 1248 1300 1313 1410 1376 1388 y 11 902 991 1019 1153 1294 1305 1304 1269 1212 1177 1116 1187 1169 1111 1248 1188 1198 1218 1174 1299 Q c 12 888 841 833 989 1068 1176 1259 1319 1251 1220 1231 1186 1218 1175 1104 1266 1126 1113 1090 1248 d TOTALS 13,347 13,609 13,579 13,960 14,309 14,423 14,566 14,465 14,343 14,208 14,459 14,830 15,130 15,522 15,753 16,308 16,599 16,905 16,191 16,601 0- Student Gain/Loss -30 381 349 114 143 -101 -122 -135 251 371 300 392 231 555 291 306 -714 412 0 0 Percent Gain/Loss -0.22% 2.81% 2.50% 0.80% 0.99% -0.69%-0.84%-0.94% 1.77% 12.57% 12.02%12.59% 11.49% 13.52% 1.78% 11.84% -4.22% 2.54% U Average Student Gain/Loss for 10 years 240 Average Percent Gain/Loss for Recent 10 years 1.59% t v c� Q Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 152 4.F.a Capital Facilities Plan c Q. 0 While still in the pandemic, it was important to consider the impact the pandemic will have on future projections. Using the Cohort Survival method, the decrease in enrollment of 4.22% in October 2020 will skew enrollment L projections for 2021 and beyond. N Some of the assumptions made in calculating projections for the 2022-23 M school year are: 1. Kindergarten enrollment will continue to beat pre-pandemic levels. a. ASD Kindergarten enrollment is almost 5% of births in King o County. However, in 2017, King County live births were at the a U_ lowest number since 2005 at 25,487 which would project an U 00 October 2022 kindergarten class of approximately 1,215 students. o N 2. The number of students generated from housing growth in the district N will slow. N N a. Currently there are no large multi-family housing active within U L the district boundaries. y 0 b. Although there is a long list of single-family developments, only 00 22 are scheduled to be occupied in the near future. Calculations were made to create cohort scenarios based upon the following survival ratios: 3-year average, 3-year weighted average, 6-year average, 6-year median, and the 10-year average. Two of the scenarios (3-year weighted average and 3-year average) were not considered because of the impact October 2020 had on the calculation. The decision was made to use the L 6-year average scenario which is found in Table 2 below. 0 Although the Auburn School District tracks single- and multi-family housing a developments, the District currently does not have estimated dates of Y completion and occupancy. Therefore, the projections shown below do not z include the student generation numbers calculated in the next section. E E a a 0. E 0 U c m E t U r Q Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 153 4.F.a Capital Facilities Plan c Q. O Q 10-Year Average Projection Actual Births FrofectedArths R 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 25,274 24,337 24,090 24,567 24,567 24,567 24,44E 24,537 24,550 24,520 O 4.79% 4.79% 4.79% 4.79% 4.7936 4.7936 4.79% 4.7936 4.79% 4.79% tO N M M 10-Ye a r N Average GRADE zz-z3 23-24 24-25 25-25 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30 3431 31-?I 4.79;b ISDG 1,211 1,165 1,154 1,177 1,176.93 1,177 1,171.12 1,175.40 1,175.D5 1,174.6D R C 1.041E 1 1,27E 1,261 1,215 1,202 1,225.99 1,226 1,225.99 1,220.04 1,224.50 1,224.13 L 1.014E 2 1,2D3 1,297 1,280 1,233 1,22D.D3 1,244 1,244.19 1,244.19 1,239.15 1,242.6E Q 1.0138 3 2,266 1,21g 1,315 1,29E 1,249.59 1,237 1,261.40 1,261.40 1,261.40 1,255.2E d 1.0155 4 2,294 1,2E6 1,23E 1,336 1,327.77 1,26R 1,256.0 1,280.90 1,280.90 1,2ED.RD V 1.0125 5 2,271 1,3DD 1,302 1,254 1,352.23 1,334 1,294.90 1,271.76 1,296.94 1,296.R4 00 0.9910 6 1,24D 1,259 1,28E 1,290 1,242.27 1,540 1,322.23 1,273.21 1,260.29 1,2E5.24 N 0 1.0175 7 2,255 1,261 1,292 1,310 1,312.84 1,264 1,363.53 1,345.41 1,295.53 1,292.3E N M 2.0113 8 1,319 1,269 1,276 1,296 1,325.33 1,32E 1,278.39 1,379.99 1,35D.67 1,31D.22 No 2.2305 9 1,493 1,491 1,434 1,442 1,464.96 1,49E 1,500.99 1,445.21 1,559.94 1,539.23 N 1.019E 10 2,414 1,513 1,52D 1,465 1,47D.E6 1,494 1,52B.02 1,53D.7E 1,473.99 1,599.9E to r D.9312 11 2,292 1,316 1,4DR 1,416 1,362.24 1,37D 1,391.24 1,422.9E 1,425.45 1,372.4E .L V Y D.R992 12 1,2g7 1,29D 1,314 1,4D6 1,413.3D 1,36D 1,367.19 1,3E2,33 1,42D.31 1,422.9E to TOTALS 16,911 16,929 17,026 17,122 17,134 17,141 17,195 17,239 17,272 17,276 O O 21.0 117 98 96 12 G 5- 44 33 4 V 1.2?3b D.7D36 D.5936 D.5630 D.D736 ".".r.3b v.32% D.2536 D.1936 D.D236 U) TOTALS BY LEVEL L K-5 7,512 7,52R 7,5D4 7,49E 7,542 7,497 7,444 7,454 7,477 7,475 N 6-8 3,813 3,79D 3,E45 3,207 3,EED 3,g3z 3,964 3,ggE 3,g16 3,97E LL 9-12 5,486 5,61D 5,677 5,727 5,711 5,722 5,797 5,799 5,979 5,925 -0 C FTRS 304 511 315 317 316 317 321 321 326 32E C L GRANDTDTAL 17,115 17,239 17,341 17,434 17,451 17,45E 17,516 17,550 17,54E 17,504 D.7336 D.5936 D.5736 D.D736 D.D436 D.333b D.25% D.2236 D.D436 O Q C N Y Student Generation Factors Planned residential development data is collected to determine the number of new residential units that may be built in the near future. The projected units will have the appropriate Student Generation Factor applied to Q determine the number of new students that planned residential a development might yield. 0. O This data was obtained through discussions with the major developers within r the District boundaries, the City of Algona, Auburn, Kent, Pacif c, King County, and District off cials. The student population by residence includes all M Q Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 154 4.F.a Capital Facilities Plan c Q. 0 approved and tentative tract maps in addition to any planned or proposed development that possibly will occur within the project timeframe. The planned residential development information and phasing estimates are a snapshot of the District as of this time. The information may change and is updated annually. M M Closely related to the planned residential development units are Student Generation Factors. When applied to planned residential development units, the Student Generation Factors determine how many additional students will be generated from new construction within the District. ° a Two sets of data are used to calculate Student Generation Factors: current U 00 student enrollment and current housing data. This information associates o N each student with a housing unit. Two general housing categories are N analyzed: Single Family and Multi-Family. Data showing the number of N students generated from previous single- and multi-family developments U generates the Student Generation Factor to be applied to future y developments. 0 0 The tables on the next two pages show the information for both single-and multi-family developments. The components include: to 3.1 • "Development Name" is a list of developments in various stages of occupancy. • "Year of Full Occupancy" is important because fully-occupied U_ developments stay on the list for f ve years contributing to the Student Generation Factor. Once the f ve years is up, the development is removed from the list. a • Also included for each development listed is the number of units, the amount of current units occupancy and the remaining units to be Y occupied. • "Feeder Pattern" shows the elementary school associated with each E development. • "Actual Students" is the data of actual students generated from the a units already occupied. a • "Student Generation Factors" is the calculation of actual students 0. divided by the number of occupied units. 0 U • "Single Family--2022 and beyond" lists the developments that are in process, but have not yet started to occupy units. E U 0 a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 155 4.F.a Capital Facilities Plan c Q. O • The units for these developments are multiplied by the Student Generation Factor for each to determine the "Estimated Students Based on Student Generation Factors" a L O The table at the bottom of the page shows an estimated timeline of when the N unoccupied units are scheduled to be occupied. M Table 3 shows the single- and multiple-family units to be occupied, the estimated number of students generated and a timeline by year of when those students would potentially be enrolled. The bottom table reflects a o cumulative number over a period of 7 school years. a U_ U SINGLE DEVELOPMENT N 0 N MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENT M N O Table 3 BUILDOUT SCHEDULE y U L Y N O O t v fC L LL L Q Y c a� E c a� E Q c d 0. E O U c m E t U O r Q Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 156 4.F.a Auburn School District Development Growth Including the Previous 5 Years May 2022(Based on Current Year Enrollment) ' d u_ U SINGLE FAMILY N 0 N Year of Full Units/ Current To Be Feeder Actual Students Student Generation Factors A Development Name Occupancy Parcels OccupancyOccupied ElementaryElem Middle HS Total Elem Middle HS Total o N Alicia Glenn 2016 28 28 0 Arthur Jacobsen 11 11 8 30 0.393 0.393 0.286 1.071 u) Anthem 2018 13 13 Ilalko 7 4 0 U former) Me an's Meadows 0 11 0.538 0.308 0.000 0.846 A Bridges 2021 380 380 0 Aurthur Jacobsen 105 43 48 196 0.276 0.113 0.126 0.516 0 Canyon Creek 2018 151 151 0 Evergreen Hts. 32 16 15 63 0.212 0.106 0.099 0.417 0 Dulcinea 2018 6 6 0 Lea Hill 1 2 1 4 0.167 0.333 0.167 0.667 u Hastings 2020 10 10 0 Evergreen Hts. 5 0 0 5 0.500 0.000 0.000 0.500 N Hazel View 2018 22 22 0 Lea Hill 10 2 5 17 0.455 0.091 0.227 0.773 f° Forest Glen at Lakland 2021 30 30 0 Gildo Rey 8 5 3 16 0.267 0.167 0.100 0.533 Lakeland Hills Estates 2017 66 66 01 Bowman Creek 201 19 111 501 0.3031 0.288 0.1671 0.758 Lakeland: Pinnacle Estates 2018 99 99 0 Bowman Creek 49 22 21 92 0.495 0.222 0.212 0.929 Li Lozier Ranch 18 7 11 Chinook 1 0 0 1 0.143 0.000 0.000 0.143 c Monterey Park 2016 238 238 0 Evergreen Hts. 60 23 27 110 0.252 0.097 0.113 0.462 c Mountain View 2018 55 55 0 Evergreen Hts. 9 3 8 20 0.164 0.055 0.145 0.364 Omnia Palisades Plate 16 14 2 AI ac 31 1 4 8 0.2141 0.071 0.2861 0.571 Q River Rock 14 5 9 Aurthur Jacobsen 4 0 0 4 0.800 0.000 0.000 0.800 r c Seremounte 2019 30 30 0 Aurthur Jacobsen 23 11 17 51 0.767 0.367 0.567 1.700 Y Sonata Hills 2017 69 69 0 Lea Hill 21 8 17 46 0.304 0.116 0.246 0.667 ' Spencer Place 2017 13 13 0 Hazelwood 7 10 7 24 0.538 0.769 0.538 1.846 m Vasiliy 2021 8 8 0 Terminal Park 0 3 0 3 0.000 0.375 0.000 0.375 Willow Place 2021 11 11 0 Lea Hill 2 0 1 0.1821 0.0001 0.2731 0.455 E Totals 1277 1255 22 378 183 1 0.301 0.146 0.155 0.602 Q c c� a a E 0 U r c a� E t v c� Q Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 157 4.F.a a LL Auburn School District U 00 Development Growth Including the Previous 5 Years c May 2022(Based on Current Year Enrollment) cD M N O N SINGLE FAMILY-- 2022 and beyond Estimated Students Based on U L Development Name Units/ Current To Be Student Generation Factors G Parcels Occupancy Occupied Elem Middle HS Total _ Ashton Park 20-Lot Prelim Plat 20 0 20 6 3 3 12 0 0 Carbon Trails 44 0 44 13 6 7 27 U Greenvale* 17 0 17 5 2 3 10 ', Knudson 17-Lot Prelim Plat 17 0 17 5 2 3 10 River Glen 12-Lot Plat 12 0 12 4 2 2 7 76 Robbins Prelim Plat 31-Lot SFR Lots 31 0 31 9 5 5 19 `m Summit at Kendall Ridge Plat 17 0 17 5 2 3 10 W The Alicias 56-Lot Plat 56 0 56 17 8 9 34 Current Partially Occupied Developments 1277 1255 22 7 3 3 13 M 1491 1 1 236 Totals 71 1 34 37 142 L Q currently under construction a� _ Y c m E c m E Q c ca a a E 0 U r c a� E t v c� Q Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 158 4.F.a a Auburn School District LL L) Development Growth Including the Previous 5 Years 00 May 2022(Based on Current Year Enrollment) c N M MULTI FAMILY o N N Year of Full Units/ Current To Be Feeder Actual Students Student Generation Factors Development Name Occupancy Parcels Occupancy Occupied Elementary u Elem Middle HS Total Elem Middle HS Total p Promenade A is 2018 294 294 0 Lea Hill 172 86 98 356 0.585 0.293 0.333 1.211 c The Villas at Auburn 2018 295 295 0 Washington 53 10 21 84 0.180 0.034 0.071 0.285 t Copper Gate Apartments 2021 500 500 0 Evergreen Hts. 288 79 81 448 0.576 0.158 0.162 0.896 in The Verge Auburn 2022 226 226 0 Terminal Park 3 2 1 6 0.013 0.009 0.004 0.027 '' Totals 1315 1315 0 516 177 201 894 0.392 0.135 0.153 0.680 L d d 2022 and beyond u_ Units/ Current To Be Estimated Students Based on 'a Parcels Occupancy Occupied p Y p� Student Generation Factors � L Lexi 1 190 0 190 75 26 29 129 Current Partially Occupied Developments 1315 1315 0 0 0 0 0 ' Q 1505 190 75 26 29 129 r c a� Y c m E c m E Q c c� a a E 0 U r c a� E t v c� Q Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 159 Capital Facilities Plan BASE DATA-BUILDOUT SCHEDULE STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS ASSUMPTIONS: 2022 Single Family Multi-Family d u_ 1. Build out estimates are received from developers. Elementary 0.301 0.392 U 00 2. Some development data received from Davis Demographics. Middle 0.146 0.135 0 N 3. Dates of potential occupancy are unavailable so student projections by year could not be calculated. High 0.155 0.153 N 0 Total 0.602 0.680 N •L TABLE 3: Units to be Occupied N 0 Single Family Units 236 Multi-Family Units 190 t Projected Students Projected Students cn Elementary(K-5) 71 Elementary(K-5) 74 Middle(6-8) 34 Middle(6-8) 26 L High (9-12) 37 High(9-12) 29 a� Total K-12 142 Total K-12 129 u_ c c L 3 Q r Y c m E c m E Q c R a 0- E 0 U r c a� E t R r a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 660 4.F.a Capital Facilities Plan c Q. 0 a m SECTION III - STANDARD OF SERVICE L 0 The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of N Auburn, City of Black Diamond and the City of Kent indicate that each school district must establish a "Standard of Service" in order to ascertain the overall c capacity to house its projected student population. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage "capacity" guidelines for o computing state funding support. The fundamental purpose of the OSPI a guidelines is to provide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching funds U for school construction projects. By default these guidelines have been used o to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population. The M OSPI guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program N needs, facility conf gurations, emerging educational reform, or the dynamics U of each student's educational program. The Auburn School District Standard N of Service addresses those local considerations that require space in excess of o the OSPI guidelines. The effect on the space requirements for both 00 permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation pattern. Conditions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without accompanying computations. L OVERVIEW L As reflected in enrollment numbers for the 2021-22 school year, the Auburn School District operates 15 elementary schools housing 7,431 students in a grades K through S. The four middle schools house 3,849 students in grades 6 Y through 8. The District operates three comprehensive senior high schools and one alternate high school, housing 5,595 students in grades 9 through 12. (Source: October 1, 2021 Enrollment) a� E a. 0 CLASS SIZE 0. E 0 U The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the student population. Specialists create additional space E M U 0 a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 161 4.F.a Capital Facilities Plan c Q. 0 needs. Class sizes are subject to collective bargaining agreements. Changes to class size agreements can have signif cant impact on available space. c L The current pupil/teacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 20.33 students per teacher. Consistent with this staff ng limit, room M capacities are set at 20.33 students per room at grades K - S. At grades 6 - 8 the limit is set at 28.02 students per room. At grades 9 - 12 the limit is set at 28.74 students per room. The OSPI space allocation for each grade articulation level, less the computed reduction for the Auburn School District o Standard of Service, determines the District's capacity to house projected a U- pupil populations. These reductions are shown in the following documents U 00 by grade articulation level. o N M N ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STANDARD OF SERVICE N N r V L MIDDLE SCHOOL STANDARD OF SERVICE y 0 0 HIGH SCHOOL STANDARD OF SERVICE STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS L LL L Q Y c a� E c a� E Q c d 0. E 0 U c m E M U r Q Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 162 4.F.a ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS C STRUCTURED LEARNING FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION Q. The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate to severe O disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses 15 classrooms to provide for 135 students. Q The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. No loss of m capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to cv total elementary population. c :a L PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION 0 The Auburn School District operates an adaptive behavior program for students with behavior disabilities at the elementary school level.The program uses three classrooms to provide for 24 students. M The housing requirements for this program exceed the OSPI space allocations. (Three classrooms @ 20.33-8= 12.33) y c Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 12.33 each = (37) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 12.33 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (37) p SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS d <L The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special V education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities. Twenty standard N classrooms are required to house this program.The housing requirements for this program are N provided for in the OSPI space guidelines at Lakeland Hills, Dick Scobee,and Bowman Creek N Elementary Schools. Continued loss of capacity is expected as growth in program is larger o than the total elementary population. N N r V Loss of Permanent Capacity 17(20-3)rooms @ 20.33 each = (346) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = 0 N Total Capacity Loss = (346) 0 O STUDENT TEACHER ENRICHMENT PROGRAM(STEP) v The Auburn School District operates an elementary program for highly capable and high achieving u) students at Grade 4 and Grade 5. This program is housed in three classrooms at Terminal Park Elementary School. 0 Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 20.33 each= (61) y Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @20.33 each= 0 m Total Capacity Loss= (61) LL c EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a pre-school program for young children below age five with 3 disabilities. This program is housed at eleven different elementary schools and currently uses 13 standard classrooms.The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI Q space guidelines. +; O Loss of Permanent Capacity 13 rooms @ 20.33 each = (264) Y Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = 0 r Total Capacity Loss = (264) E READING LABS C The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional E language arts instruction. These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces if available in Q each elementary school. Five elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available,thus cv they are housed in a standard classroom.The housing requirements for this program are not (L provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. O. E Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 20.33 each = (102) L) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = 0 +: Total Capacity Loss = (102) y E t U O r Q Packet Pg. 163 4.F.a MUSIC ROOMS c The Auburn School District elementary music programs require one acoustically-modified classroom at each Q. school for music instruction. The housing requirements are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. O Q Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @ 20.33 each = (305) m Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = 0 cv Total Capacity Loss = (305) c :a L ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM O The Auburn School District operates pullout programs at the elementary school level for students learning English as a second language. This program requires 30 standard classrooms that are not M provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. m Loss of Permanent Capacity 30 rooms @ 20.33 each = (610) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (610) L O SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM ' The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for eight highly-impacted LL elementary schools. This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade V level and do not receive other services. This program requires eight standard classrooms that are N not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. N M Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 20.33 each = (163) o Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = 0 N Total Capacity Loss = (163) N U 'L Y ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM N The Auburn School District provides a learning specialist program to increase literacy skills for first and second graders. This program model was originally created from the 1-728 funds and currently O O has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms,as well as pulling out students into designated classrooms. The district is utilizing classrooms at all fifteen elementary schools. U) Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @ 20.33 each = (305) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (305) y m EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM LL The Auburn School District operates an ECEAP program for 236 pre-school aged children in twelve sections of half-day length and one full-day program. The program is housed at seven elementary schools and utilizes seven standard elementary classrooms and one additional classroom space and seven auxiliary office spaces. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. 3 Q Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 20.33 each = (142) y Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each = 0 Y Total Capacity Loss = (142) r c a� E c a� E Q c cv d O. E O L) c m E t U O r Q Packet Pg. 164 4.F.a MIDDLE SCHOOLS c SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS a The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level. 0 This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific Q disabilities. Eleven classrooms are required at the middle school level to provide for approximately 330 students. The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. c PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior disabilities. The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses two classrooms. One of the N two classrooms for this program are provided for in the OSPI space allocations. M Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 rooms @ 28.02 each = (28) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (28) L O STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates seven structured learning classrooms at the middle school level for U_ students with moderate to severe disabilities. Two of the seven classrooms for this program are provided for V in the OSPI space allocations. c N Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 28.02 each = (140) N Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each = 0 N Total Capacity Loss (140) r U L ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM N The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for English Language Learner students. This program requires eleven standard classrooms that are not provide for in the OSPI c space guidelines. t Loss of Permanent Capacity 11 rooms @ 28.02 each = (308) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (308) L ROOM UTILIZATION LL The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available i teaching stations. OSPI Report#3 dated 12/14/11 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the mid-level facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations. Q Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 28.02 each = (224) a� Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each = 0 `1 Total Capacity Loss (224) a� E c a� E Q c d 0. E 0 U c m E t U 0 r Q Packet Pg. 165 4.F.a HIGH SCHOOLS C NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM ;. The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American p students at the high school level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Q d Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 28.74 each = (29) v c Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (29) :a L ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at three comprehensive high schools for English N Language Learner students. This program requires fourteen standard classrooms that are not provided M for in the OSPI space guidelines. N Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 28.74 each= (402) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each= 0 C Total Capacity Loss (402) "a O PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION ' The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior LL diabilities. The program is housed at one of the high schools and uses two classrooms. The housing V requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI space allocations. N 0 N Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 28.74 each= (57) A Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each= 0 0 Total Capacity Loss (57) N N r STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates twelve structured learning center classrooms for students with N_ moderate to severe disabilities. This program is housed at three high schools requiring standard classrooms that are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. O O t Loss of Permanent Capacity 12 rooms @ 28.74 each= (345) v U) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (345) 3.1 SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities. The current LL high school program requires 15 classrooms to provide program to meet educational needs of -O the students. The OSPI space guidelines provide for one of the 15 teaching stations. C L Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 28.74 each= (402) 3 Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (402) Q PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS O Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center.The Y OSPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity. This space was not intended for,nor is it usable for,classroom instruction. It was constructed to provide a community center for the performing arts. Using OSPI capacity guidelines,25,000 square feet E computes to 208 unhoused students or 7.25 classrooms. N E Loss of Permanent Capacity 7.25 rooms @ 28.74 each= (208) Q c cv ROOM UTILIZATION d The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous O. elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are E not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95%utilization of all available U teaching stations.There are 185 teaching stations available in the senior high facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 10 teaching stations. y E Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 28.74 each= (287) v Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each= 0 R Total Capacity Loss (287) Q Packet Pg. 166 4.F.a a� c :r Q. STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS O ELEMENTARY Q Loss of Permanent Capacity (2,334) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 c Total Capacity Loss (2,334) =a MIDDLE SCHOOL O Loss of Permanent Capacity (701) co Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 M Total Capacity Loss (701) SENIOR HIGH c Loss of Permanent Capacity (1,732) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 =a Total Capacity Loss (1,732) O TOTAL a Loss of Permanent Capacity (4,766) v Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 N Total Capacity Loss (4,766) N M N O N N r V L Y N O O t v U) fC L u- L Q Y c a� c a� E Q c d 0. E O U c m E t u O r Q Packet Pg. 167 4.F.a Capital Facilities Plan c Q. 0 Q m SECTION IV - INVENTORY OF FACILITIES L Table IV.1 shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their O OSPI rated capacities. N M M Table IV.2 shows the number and location of each portable by school. The district uses relocatable facilities to: 1. provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted o by increasing school populations that would otherwise require a continual redistricting, U 2. make space available for changing program requirements and offerings o determined by unique students needs, and M 3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be N f nanced and constructed. U L Y N Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often o place undesirable stress on existing physical plants. Core facilities (i.e. 0 gymnasiums, restrooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc.) are not of suff cient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable classrooms. L TABLE IV.1 PERMANENT DISTRICT SCHOOL FACILITIES U- c 0 TABLE IV.2 PORTABLE FACILITIES INVENTORY i 0 DISTRICT SCHOOL FACILITIES MAP a a� Y c a� E c a� E Q c d 0. E 0 U c m E M U r Q Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 168 4.F.a Capital Facilities Plan c Q. 0 Q Table Permanent Facilities District School Facilities IV,1 OSPI Rated Capacity c (March 2022) L O Building Capacity Acres Address N M M Elementa Schools AI ac Elementary 505 10.68 310 Milwaukee Boulevard North, Pacific WA, 98047 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 614 10.02 29205 132"d Street SE,Auburn WA, 98092 m Bowman Creek Elementary 812 22.03 5701 Kersey Way SE,Auburn, WA 98092 Chinook Elementary 461 13.09 3502 Auburn Way South,Auburn WA, 98092 Dick Scobee Elementary 819 9.13 1031 14th Street Northeast,Auburn WA, 98002 Evergreen Heights Elem. 463 10.10 5602 South 316th,Auburn WA, 98001 LL Gildo Rey Elementary 566 10.05 1005 37th Street Southeast,Auburn WA, 98002 V 00 Hazelwood Elementary594 13.08 11815 Southeast 304th Street,Auburn WA, 98092 c Ilalko Elementary 592 14.23 301 Oravetz Place Southeast,Auburn WA, 98092 N M Lake View Elementary581 16.44 16401 Southeast 318th Street,Auburn WA, 98092 c Lakeland Hills Elementary 594 12.00 1020 Evergreen Way SE,Auburn WA, 98092 N N Lea Hill Elementary 450 20.24 30908 124th Avenue Southeast,Auburn WA, 98092 Pioneer Elementary 837 11.13 2301 M Street Southeast,Auburn WA, 98002 N Terminal Park Elementary 415 6.09 1101 D Street Southeast,Auburn WA, 98002 p Washington Elementary 494 5.33 20 E Street Northeast,Auburn WA, 98002 c ELEMENTARY CAPACITY 8,797 rn Middle Schools >+ Cascade Middle School 837 16.94 1015 24th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Mt. Baker Middle School 837 30.00 620 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 cLa Olympic Middle School 974 17.45 839 2151 Street SE, Auburn WA, 98002 -0a Rainier Middle School 843 25.54 30620 116th Avenue Southeast,Auburn WA, 98092 Li MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3,491 C ca Senior High Schools L Auburn HS 2,127 23.74 711 East Main Street,Auburn WA, 98002 Auburn Mountainview HS 1,443 39.42 28900 124th Ave SE,Auburn WA, 98092 Q Auburn Riverside HS 1,387 35.32 501 Oravetz Road,Auburn WA, 98092 West Auburn HS 233 5.26 401 West Main Street, Auburn WA, 98001 Y HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5,190 c a� TOTAL CAPACITY 17,478 E c a� E Q c d 0. E 0 U c m E t U r Q Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 169 Capital Facilities Pla, INVENTORY OF FACILITIES a� c :r Q. 0 TABLE TEMPORARY/RELOCATABLE Q m IV.2 FACILITIES INVENTORY U c June 2022 c Elementary Location 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 2028-2029 'a Alpac 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 O Arthur Jacobsen 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 m N Bowman Creek 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M Chinook 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m Dick Scobee 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c Evergreen Heights 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Gildo Rey 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 'a Hazelwood 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 Ilalko 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 d Lake View 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 u_ U Lakeland Hills 7 5 5 5 5 5 5 00 N Lea Hill 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c N Pioneer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M N Terminal Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c N Washington 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 r Willow Crest 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L TOTAL UNITS 45 43 43 43 43 43 43 N TOTAL CAPACITY 915 874 874 874 874 874 874 0 0 Middle School Location 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 2028-2029 0 Cascade 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Mt. Baker 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 f° Olympic 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Rainier 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 a� TOTAL UNITS 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 LL TOTAL CAPACITY 981 981 981 981 981 981 981 -0 c ca c L Sr. High School Location 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 2028-2029 Auburn High School 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Q Auburn High School-*TAP 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Auburn Mountainview 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Y Auburn Riverside 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 West Auburn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 E TOTAL CAPACITY 862 862 862 862 862 862 862 a� "TAP-Transition Assistance Program for 18-21 year old students with special needs. E Q c COMBINED TOTAL UNITS 110 108 108 108 108 108 108 . COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY 2,758 2,717 2,717 2,717 2,717 2,717 2,717 0. 0 U c m E t U r Q Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 170 .-.� .1 .�=Y ,'� � _.� _-f! �' �+`;,-�,?�+. }��ak r�s^ •'•rp � a. ..ate. - + ` . Auburn Mountainview HS. �. , • „ter rthur Jacobsen ES Hazelwood E ,. `v Crest ES �` ` ION," arcade MS Rainier M ick Scobee E Y J T fti. Administration Buildin Auburn HS y, '`" _ :": "J • 'S! ashingtor ES st Park ES T F r Ympic PA k ES A IN ioneer ES IP Gildo Rey ES Mt Baker MS r=�.#• Ipac ES Auburn Riversi r V,,,,-P Ilalko ES r w wman Creek ES eland Hills ES tar IN f o D o o 0 0 v�o[S ]p -o o .o �QMW�o �DMo U&D�` 9'/—'"o'(s�M (RE�Comm* 4.F.a Capital Facilities Plan c Q. 0 Q SECTION V - PUPIL CAPACITY L 0 While the Auburn School District uses the OSPI inventory of permanent N facilities as the data from which to determine space needs, the District's FIL educational program requires more space than that provided for under the c formula. This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in Section III, Standard of Service. The District's capacity is adjusted to reflect o the need for additional space to house its programs. Changes in the capacity a of the district recognize new funded facilities. The combined effect of these U adjustments is shown on Line B in Tables V.l and V.2. Table V.l shows the o District's capacity with relocatable units included and Table V.2 without these M u n its. Na N N r V TABLE V.l CAPACITY WITH RELOCATABLES N TABLE V.2 CAPACITY WITHOUT RELOCATABLES 00 PERMANENT FACILITIES (a SPI RATED CAPACITY L U- L Q Y c a� E c a� E Q c 0 d 0. E 0 U c m E t U r Q Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 172 Capital Facilities Pla, a� c :r Q. 0 Q m c Table V.1 c Capacity WITH relocatables 21-22 22-23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 0 A. SPI Capacity 17,478 17,478 18,517 18,752 18,752 18,752 18,752 19,552 N A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 650 A.2 SPI Capacity-Replacements 389 235 A.3 SPI Capacity-New MS 800 c 0 B. Capacity Adjustments 2,059 2,008 2,042 2,042 2,042 2,042 2,042 2,042 E P Y 1 -0 C. Net Capacity 15,419 16,509 16,710 16,710 16,710 16,710. 17,510. 17,510. pL D. ASD Enrollment 16,880 17,115 17,239 17,341 17,439 17,451 17,458 17,516 LLLL U 00 3/ E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (1,461) (606) (529) (631) (729) (741) 52 (6) c N CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS N 0 N Include Relocatable 2,707 2,758 2,724 2,724 2,724 2,724 2,724 2,724 r 2/ Exclude SOS 17 4,766 4,766 4,766 4,766 4,766 4,766 4,766 4,766 •2 Total Adjustments (2,059) (2,008) (2,042) (2,042) (2,042) (2,042) (2,042) (2,042) 2 0 0 U) 0 L LL L Q Y c a� E c a� E Q c d E 0 U c m E t U r Q Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 173 Capital Facilities Plan d LL U Table V.2 0 N Capacity N WITHOUT relocatables 21-22 22-23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 M A. SPI Capacity 17,478 17,478 18,517 18,752 18,752 18,752 18,752 19,552 0 A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 650 N A.2 SPI Capacity-Replacements 389 235 cn A.3 SPI Capacity-New MS 800 .L V (n B. Capacity Adjustments 4,766 4,766 4,766 4,766 4,766 4,766 4,766 4,766 p C. Net Capacity 12,712 13,751 13,986 13,986 13,986 13,986 14,786 14,786 0 O D. ASD Enrollment 16,880 17,115 17,239 17,341 17,439 17,451 17,458 17,516 v N 3/ E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (4,168) (3,364) (3,253) (3,355) (3,453) (3,465) (2,672) (2,730) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS R L d 2/ Exclude SOS 17 4,766 4,766 4,766 4,766 4,766 4,766 4,766 4,766 N Total Adjustments (4,766) (4,766) (4,766) (4,766) (4,766) (4,766) (4,766) (4,766) LL C 1/ New facilities shown in 2019-20 through 2023-24 are funded by the 2016 School Bond Issue. 2/ The Standard of Service represents 27.26%of OSPI capacity. When new facilities are added the Standard of Service i computations are decreased to 25.42%of SPI capacity. 3/ Students beyond the capacity are accommodated in other spaces(commons,library,theater,shared teaching space). Q r C N Y C d E C d E Q C cC a 0- E 0 U r c a� E t v crs Q Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 174 Capital Facilities Plan PERMANENT FACILITIES d LL @ SPI Rated Capacity U March 2022 00 N O N A. Elementary Schools Cl) Building 21-22 22-23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 N O Washingtoi 494 494 494 494 494 494 494 494 N Terminal Park 415 415 650 650 650 650 650 650 Dick Scobee 819 819 819 819 819 819 819 819 •L Pioneer 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 n Chinook 461 650 650 650 650 650 650 650 0 Lea Hill 450 650 650 650 650 650 650 650 C Gildo Rey 566 566 566 566 566 566 566 566 t Evergreen Heights 463 463 463 463 463 463 463 463 U) Alpac 505 505 505 505 505 505 505 505 Lake View 581 581 581 581 581 581 581 581 Hazelwood 594 594 594 594 594 594 594 594 Ilalko 592 592 592 592 592 592 592 592 d Lakeland Hills 594 594 594 594 594 594 594 594 Arthur Jacobsen 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 LL Bowman Creek 812 812 812 812 812 812 812 812 C Willow Crest -- 650 650 650 650 650 650 650 C ELEMENTARY CAPACITY 8,797 9,836 10,071 10,071 10,071 10,071 10,071 10,071 B. Middle Schools Q Building 21-22 22-23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 Cascade 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 Olympic 974 974 974 974 974 974 974 974 Y Rainier 843 843 843 843 843 843 843 843 +� C Mt.Baker 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 G� Middle School#5 -- -- -- -- -- - 800 800 E MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3,491 3,491 3,491 3,491 3,491 3,491 4,291 4,291 E C. Senior High Schools Q Building 21-22 22-23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 r- R West Auburn 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 d Auburn 2,127 2,127 2,127 2,127 2,127 2,127 2,127 2,127 C Auburn Riverside 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 C Auburn Mountainview 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 U HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5,190 5,190 5,190 5,190 5,190 5,190 5,190 5,190 E t COMBINED CAPACITY 17,478 18,517 18,752 18,752 18,752 18,752 19,552 19,552 V R r a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 175 4.F.a Capital Facilities Plan c Q. 0 SECTION VI - CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN L The formal process used by the Auburn School Board to address current and future facility needs began almost 50 years ago in 1974. The process includes a M formation of a community-wide citizen's committee and throughout the FIL years, these Ad Hoc Committees have conducted work and made recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and facilities. L In October of 2008, after two years of review and study, a Steering Committee ° made recommendations to the Board regarding the capital improvements U_ program to modernize or replace facilities as recommended by the 2004-05 U Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee. These recommendations, based on specif c N criteria, led to the Board placing a school improvement bond and capital M improvements levy on the ballot in March 2009. Voters did not approve either N measure that would have updated 24 facilities and replaced three aging schools. The Board decided to place only a six-year Capital Levy on the ballot in November of 2009, which passed at 55.17%. The levy funded $46.4 million o of needed improvement projects at 24 sites over the following seven school o years. Planning for the replacement of aging schools was started with educational specif cations and schematic design process for the replacement cn of Auburn High School. cc The District acquired a site for a future high school in 2008 and a second site for a future middle school in 2009. The District also continued efforts to U_ acquire property around Auburn High School. The Special Education Transitional Assistance Program (TAP) opened in February of 2010. This facility is designed for students with disabilities that are 18 to 21 years old. In the November 2012 election, the community supported the $110 million a bond issue for the Auburn High School Modernization and Reconstruction Y Project at 62%. Construction began in February 2013. The entire new building Z was occupied by Auburn High School students and staff in the fall of 2015, a) with site improvements being completed during the 2015-16 school year. In January 2015, a citizen's ad hoc committee was convened by direction of the Board to address growth and facilities. The major recommendations were Q to construct two new elementary schools in the next four years and to acquire 3 new elementary school sites as soon as possible. a. Q. E 0 U c m E t U r Q Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 176 4.F.a Capital Facilities Plan c Q. O In the November 2016 election, the community supported the $456 million bond issue for the replacement of six schools and the construction of two new elementary schools at 62.83%. Construction for the replacement of Olympic Middle School began in May 2018 and was completed in Fall 2019. o Construction for Bowman Creek Elementary School began in May 2019 and was completed in Fall 2020. Construction for the replacement of Dick Scobee M Elementary School began in June 2019 and was completed in Fall 2020. Construction for Willow Crest Elementary School and replacement of Pioneer Elementary School began in May 2020 and was completed in Fall 2021. Construction for replacement of Chinook and Lea HIII Elementary Schools o began in June 2021 and will be completed in Fall of 2022. Construction for replacement of Terminal Park Elementary School will begin in June 2022 and u- will be completed in Fall of 2023. N 0 N We anticipate running a Capital Bond Measure in 2026. Funds will be used to N construct a new middle school on property currently owned by the District, N and may include funds to replace one or more existing schools. 'L Y The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next o six years. The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in c the school age population. 2022-28 Capital Construction Plan (May 2022 Projected Fund Project Timelines Project Funded Cost Source 21-22 22-23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 u_ 2020 C Technology f° Modernization Yes $35,000,000 6 Year XX XX XX XX XX XX i Cap. Levy Impact Q 1/ Portable Relocation Yes $1,400,000 Fees XX XX � Property Purchase Bond Yes $7,500,000 Impact XX Y 1/ - 1 New Elementary Fee ' — r Bond Middle School#5 Yes $112,000,000 Impact XX XX E 2/ Fee pllaa n plan const con st open -a — C Replacement of XX XX XX E five Elementary Yes $242,500,000 Bond const const open Q 1/ Schools 1/ These funds may be secured through a combination of the 2016 Bond Issue,sale of real property,impact fees,and state matching funds. d 2/ These funds may be secured through a combination of a bond issue,impact fees,and state matching funds. Q' E O U c m E t U O r Q Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 177 4.F.a Capital Facilities Plan c Q. O SECTION VII - IMPACT FEES L IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION (SPRING 2022) O N TABLES I - IV M a� TABLES V - VI c IMPACT FEE ELEMENTS o a LL U 00 N O N M N O N N r V �L Y N O O t v U) m fC L LL L Q Y c a� E c a� E Q c d E O U c m E t U O r Q Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 178 Capital Facilities Plan c IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION(Spring 2022) a O Q m I. SITE COST PER RESIDENCE V C Formula: ((Acres x Cost perAcre)/ acilit Size)x Student Factor O C Site Cost/ Facility Student Generation Factor Cost/ E$4,425.81 L Acreage Acre Capacity Single FamilyMulti FamilySingle Family Q Elem Sch(K-5) 15 $489,248 650 0.3010 0.3920 $3,398.39 Middle Sch(6-8) 25 $0 800 0.1460 0.1350 $0.00 NSr Hi h 9-12 40 $0 1500 0.1550 0.1530 $0.00 M M $3,398.39 $4,425.81 d c� H. PERMANENT FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCE O cC Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Size x Student Factor) Permanent to Total Square Footage Percentage) Facility Facility %Perm Sq Ft/ Student Generation Factor Cost/ Cost/ O Single Family Cost Size Total Scl Ft Single Family Multi Familv Single Family Multi Family Elem (K-5) $0 650 0.9485 0.3010 0.3920 $0.00 $0.00 d Mid Sch(6-8) $134,320,000 800 0.9485 0.1460 0.1350 $23,251.96 $21,500.10 ILL t� Sr High 9-12 $0 1500 0.9485 0.1550 0.1530 $0.00 $0.00 ap $23,251.96 $21,500.10 N 0 N M. TEMPORARY FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCE N Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Size x Student Factor x(Temporary to Total Square Footage Ratio N Facility Facility %Temp Sq Ft1 Student Generation Factor Cost/ Cost/ r Single Family Cost Size Total Scl Ft Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Family v Elem(K-5) $250,000 20.33 0.0515 0.3010 0.3920 $190.47 $248.06 y Mid Sch(6-8) $250,000 28.02 0.0515 0.1460 0.1350 $67.03 $61.98 Sr High 9-12 $250,000 28.74 0.0515 0.1550 0.1530 $69.38 $68.49 C $326.88 $378.53 O t V IV. STATE MATCH CREDIT PER RESIDENCE y Formula: (Boeckh Index x SPI Footage x District Match x Student Factor icC Boeckh SPI State Student Generation Factor Cost/ Cost/ Index Footage Match Single Famil Multi Family Single Family Multi Family Elem(K-5) $0.00 90 63.83% 0.3010 0.3920 $0.00 $0.00 � Mid Sch(6-8) $246.83 108 63.83% 0.1460 0.1350 $2,484.27 $2,297.10 li Sr High 9-12 $0.00 130 63.83% 0.1550 0.1530 $0.00 $0.00 13 $2,484.27 $2,297.11 R C L 3 3 Q d Y c O E c O E a a a E O C) c d E t c� to Q Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 179 Capital Facilities Pla, am c IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION(Spring 2022) :r a 0 Q m c V. TAX CREDIT PER RESIDENCE cC C Formula: Expressed as the present value of an annuity :a TC=PV(interest rate,discount period,average assd value x tax rate) O Ave Resid Curr Dbt Sery Bnd Byr Indx Number of Tax Credit Tax Credit N Assd Value Tax Rate Ann Int Rate Years Single Family Multi Family M Single Family $458,409 $2.13 2.45% 10 $8,567.73 m C Multi FamilY $223,737 $2.13 2.45% 10 $4,181.68 'a L O Vl. DEVELOPER PROVIDED FACILITY CREDIT Formula: (Value of Site or Facility/Number of dwelling units) LL U Value No.of Units Facility Credit N Single Family $0.00 1 $0.00 N M N Multi Family $0.00 1 $0.00 c N N r V FEE PER UNIT IMPACT FEES N RECAP Single Multiple SUMMARY Family Family 0 Site Costs $3,398.39 $4,425.81 0 Permanent Facility Const Costs $23,251.96 $21,500.10 Temporary Facility Costs $326.88 $378.53 State Match Credit ($2,484.27) ($2,297.11) Tax Credit $8,567.73 $4,181.68 FEE(No Discount) $15,925.22 $19,825.65 FEE(50%Discount) $7,962.61 $9,912.82 d LL Less ASD Discount $0.00 $0.00 -a C Facility Credit $0.00 $0.00 C Net Fee Obli ation $7,962.61 $9,912.82 3 Q N Y c a� c a� E Q c d D. E 0 U c m E t U r Q Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 180 Capital Facilities Plan SINGLE FAMILY MULTI FAMILY d ILL IMPACT FEE ELEMENTS Elem Mid Sch Sr High Elem Mid Sch Sr High U K-5 6-8 9-12 K-5 6-8 9-12 eo N Student Factor Single Family-Auburn actual count April 2022 0.301 0.146 0.155 0.392 0.135 0.153 N New Fac Capacity 650 800 1500 650 800 1500 Cl) New Facility Cost Middle School Cost Estimate May 2022 $134,320,000 $134,320,000 c N N Temp Rim Capacity ASD District Standard of Service. 20.33 28.02 28.74 20.33 28.02 28.74 v Grades K-5 @ 20.33,6-8 @ 28.02,&9-12 @ 28.74. N Temp Facility Cost Relocatables,including site work,set up,and furnishing. $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 O Site Acreage ASD District Standard or SPI Minimum 12 25 40 12 25 40 t Site Cost/Acre See below $489,248 $489,248 $489,248 $489,248 $489,248 $489,248 v Perm Sq Footage 16 Elementary,4 Middle,and 4 High Schools 1,835,123 1,835,123 1,835,123 1,835,123 1,835,123 1,835,123 f3 Temp Sq Footage 24 x 864 SF+85 x 896 SF+TAP 2661 99,557 99,557 99,557 99,557 99,557 99,557 Total Sq Footage Sum of Permanent and Temporary above 1,934,680 1,934,680 1,934,680 1,934,680 1,934,680 1,934,680 -Perm Facilities Permanent Sq.Footage divided by Total Sq.Footage 94.85% 94.85% 94.85% 94.85% 94.85% 94.85% G> -Temp Facilities Temporary Sq.Footage divided by Total Sq.Footage 5.15% 5.15% 5.15% 5.15% 5.15% 5.15% y ILL SPI Sq Ft/Student From OSPI Regulations(WAC 392-343-035) 90 108 130 90 108 130 Boeckh Index From OSPI in May 2022 $246.83 $246.83 $246.83 $246.83 $246.83 $246.83 fC Match%-State From OSPI May 2022 63.83% 63.83% 63.83% 63.83% 63.83% 63.83% i Match%-District Computed 36.17% 36.17% 36.17% 36.17% 36.17% 36.17% 3 Dist Aver AV King County Department of Assessments March 2022 $458,409 $458,409 $458,409 $223,737 $223,737 $223,737 Q r C Debt Sery Tax Rate Current Fiscal Year $2.13 $2.13 $2.13 $2.13 $2.13 $2.13 G.O Bond Int Rate Current Rate-(Bond Buyer 20 Index Feb.2022 avg) 2.45% 2.45% 2.45% 2.45% 2.45% 2.45% Y Site Cost Projections m Recent Property Purchase Purchase Purchase Adjusted Projected Annual Sites Latest Date Projected Acquisitions Acreage Year Price Cost/Acre Present Day Inflation Factor Required ofAc uisition Cost/Acre C Elem.#16 Parcel 1 1.26 2019 $480,000 $382,166 $485,541 10.00% Elements 2023 $538,173 4) Elem.#16 Parcel 2 8.19 2019 $2,959,561 $361,363 $459,111 2019 Annual 2020Annual 2021Annual 2022 Annual E Elem.#16 Parcel 3 0.80 2018 $460,000 $575,000 $803,591 Inflation Factor Inflation Factor Inflation Factor Inflation Factor O Total 10.25 $3,899,561 $380,593 $489,248 10.00% 5% 10.00% 10.00% R IL a E O U r c a� E t R r a Auburn School District No.408 Packet Pg. 181 4.G ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Kurt Hanson, AICP, EDFP 220 Fourth Avenue South KENT Kent, WA 98032 WASHINGTON 253-856-5454 DATE: November 1, 2022 TO: Operations and Public Safety Committee SUBJECT: Updated School Impact Fees — Ordinance - Adopt MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4448, amending Sections 12.13.160 and 12.13.170 of the Kent City Code to adjust the school impact fee schedules for the Kent, Auburn, and Federal Way School Districts. SUMMARY: The Kent City Code provides for imposition of school impact fees on behalf of any school district which provides to the City annual updates of their capital facilities plan. The City of Kent incorporates Capital Facilities Plans for area school districts into the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan. Timely submittal of a Capital Facilities Plan is a prerequisite to assessment of a school impact fee on residential construction. This year, Kent, Auburn, and the Federal Way School Districts submitted plans, including impact fee calculation updates. The Highline School District did not submit any information and the Renton School District does not have an interlocal agreement with the City. Impact fees for the Kent, Auburn, and Federal Way School Districts are proposed to be updated in accordance with these most recent calculations, and the proposed ordinance imposes those revised impact fee calculations. BUDGET IMPACT: As described. SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Innovative Government - Delivering outstanding customer service, developing leaders, and fostering innovation. Thriving City - Creating safe neighborhoods, healthy people, vibrant commercial districts, and inviting parks and recreation. Sustainable Services - Providing quality services through responsible financial management, economic growth, and partnerships. ATTACHMENTS: 1. School Impact Fees 2023 (PDF) Packet Pg. 182 4.G.a ORDINANCE NO. 4448 , a 0 a AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending Sections 12.13.160 and 12,13.170 of the Kent City Code to adjust the school impact fee schedules (CPZ-2022- 1). U- U 0 Q. RECITALS E 6 0 z A. The City of Kent has adopted a school impact fee program as in 13 authorized by the State Growth Management Act (GMA) and RCW 2 W 82.02.050. a LO N B. Chapter 12.13 of the Kent City Code (KCC) requires that the M Capital Facilities Plans of school districts be submitted to the City of Kent on N 0 an annual basis for City Council review, and that this review must occur in y as conjunction with any update of the Capital Facilities Element of the City's U- Comprehensive Plan. The City Council has reviewed the Capital Facilities a E Plans submitted by the school districts. 6 0 C. The Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts have Cn requested amendments to the text of Kent City Code to reflect proposed changes to impact fees. Highline School District has not requested an impact U fee for this year. a D. On September 15, 2022, the City provided the required 60-day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 to the State of Washington of the City's 1 School Impact Fees — 2023 Packet Pg. 183 4.G.a proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan and Chapter 12.13 of the KCC. The 60-day notice period passed on November 14, 2022. E. After a public hearing before the City Council on October 19, 2022, the City Council on November 15, 2022, approved Comprehensive 0 Plan Amendment CPZ-2022-1 to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Q a� Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts, and changes to the Kent City Code to reflect impact fees as follows: (1) for the Kent School District, decreasing the school impact fee for single-family units to $0.00, and for multifamily units to $0.00; (2) for the Federal Way School District, decreasing the school impact fee for single-family units to $0.00, and for Q. multifamily units to $0.00; and (3) for the Auburn School District, increasing E 0 the school impact fee for single-family units to $7,963.00, and increasing 0 U the school impact fee for multifamily units to $9,913.00. a� F. In order to implement the new impact fee schedules referenced above, it is necessary to amend sections 12.13.160 and 12.13.170 of the N M KCC. M N O NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, y as WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Ui a E ORDINANCE 0 0 SECTION 1. - Amendment. Section 12.13.160 of the Kent City Code in is hereby amended as follows: E M U Sec. 12.13.160. Base fee schedule. The following fee shall be 2 a assessed for the indicated types of development: 2 School Impact Fees - 2023 Packet Pg. 184 4.G.a School Single-Family Multifamily Multifamily District Studio Kent, $5,818 -$0 $2,458 $0 $0 No. 415 Federal $1,845 -$0 $9,450 $0 $0 0 Way, No. Q 210 a� Auburn, $3,652 $7,963 $8,938 $9,913 $0 No. 408 0 Highline, $0 $0 $0 No. 401 U Q. E SECTION 2. - Amendment. Section 12.13.170 of the Kent City Code 6 0 is hereby amended as follows: n a� Sec. 12.13.170. Maximum allowable fees. School impact fees provided by this chapter shall be assessed based on the calculation set forth LO in KCC 12.13.140, unless they exceed a maximum allowable fee as set forth M M in this section. There shall be an increase in the maximum allowable fee M N each year by the same percentage as the percentage change in the previous N N N calendar year's average monthly Engineering News Record (ENR) Seattle U_ Area Construction Cost Index values, relative to the corresponding average a monthly ENR Construction Cost Index values for the preceding year, as E 0 calculated from August 1st through July 30th. The maximum allowable fee is set at $10,044 $10,446 for single-family as dwelling units and a maximum of $10,234 $11,298 for multifamily dwelling E U units for 2022 2023. a 3 School Impact Fees - 2023 Packet Pg. 185 4.G.a SECTION 3. - Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering; or references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations. , a 0 SECTION 4. - Severability. If any one or more section, subsection, Q a� or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, that decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. a� U- SECTION 5. - Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be Q. in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law. E 0 0 z U November 15, 2022 DANA RALPH, MAYOR Date Approved LO ATTEST: N M M M N November 15, 2022 N KIMBERLEY A. KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted U- November 18, 2022 Date Published 0 0 APPROVED AS TO FORM: c as E U TAMMY WHITE, CITY ATTORNEY r a 4 School Impact Fees - 2023 Packet Pg. 186 4.H FINANCE DEPARTMENT Paula Painter, CPA 220 Fourth Avenue South KENT Kent, WA 98032 WASHINGTON 253-856-5264 DATE: November 1, 2022 TO: Operations and Public Safety Committee SUBJECT: Tax Code Amendments - Ordinance - Adopt MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4449, amending sections 3.18.020, 3.28.010, and 3.28.130 of the Kent City Code to revise the fund allocations for tax revenue generated from the City's tax on water, sewer, and drainage utilities, and to remove limitations on the allocation of revenue generated from the City's B&O tax and square footage tax. SUMMARY: Pursuant to Chapter 3.28 of the Kent City Code, the City imposes a business and occupation (B&O) tax, and pursuant to Chapter 3.18 of the Kent City Code, the City imposes utility taxes on the following utility services: Electricity • Manufactured and Natural Gas Telephone, including Cellular Phone 0 Cable Television • Solid Waste Collection • Water, Sewer, and Drainage The proposed ordinance reallocates revenue from the tax on water, sewer, and drainage utilities, and revenue from the B&O gross receipts and square footage tax. These allocation revisions are intended to better align the City's General Fund revenue sources with the City's ongoing operational expenses. Property tax revenue is limited to 1% annual growth, plus new construction. As such, this revenue source does not keep pace with the City's ongoing operational expenses within the General Fund. Revenue allocation revisions seek a revenue neutral exchange of a portion of property tax revenue currently allocated to the General Fund, for Capital Resource Fund dedicated revenue sources, inclusive of the utility and B&O tax revenue allocation changes in this ordinance. While the exchange is revenue neutral in total to the City, it betters aligns ongoing General Fund operating costs that are impacted by inflation, with revenue sources that reflect a historical pattern of also responding to market conditions. The reallocation of revenue sources includes shifting 100 percent of sales tax in the City's Capital Resources Fund to support General Fund operations. Ordinances relating to property tax and sales tax changes are separately proposed. Packet Pg. 187 4.H This proposed ordinance does not result in an increased tax obligation or reporting requirement for any business; however, this ordinance does change the allocation of certain B&O tax and utility tax revenues between City funds as follows: 1. Chapter 3.18 Utility Tax on Water, Sewer, and Drainage Utilities: a. Increases the percentage to the General Fund from 43.85% to 90.00% b. Eliminates the allocation to the Capital Resources Fund (30.77%) and for the repayment and elimination of debt in the Other Projects Fund (15.38%) c. Does not change the allocation for City Street Improvement programs (7.69%) or Youth/Teen programs (2.31%) 2. Chapter 3.28 Business and Occupation Tax: a. All revenues dedicated to the General Fund b. Eliminates the allocation for the design, construction, maintenance, improvement, operation, and repair of the City's infrastructure and appurtenant improvements including without limitation, streets, gutters, sidewalks, bicycle and pedestrian lanes and paths, street trees, lighting, and signalization. BUDGET IMPACT: There are no expected budget impacts as a result of this motion. SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Sustainable Services - Providing quality services through responsible financial management, economic growth, and partnerships. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Tax Ordinance - Amend KCC 3.18.020 3.28.010 3.28.130 (PDF) Packet Pg. 188 4.H.a Q. 0 Q a� ORDINANCE NO. 4449 c c L O N AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending sections E 3.18.020, 3.28.010 and 3.28.130 of the Kent City Code to revise the fund allocations for tax revenue E generated from the City's tax on water, sewer, and drainage utilities, and to remove limitations on the 0 allocation of revenue generated from the City's B&O X gross receipts and square footage tax. o� N M M RECITALS M 00 N A. From time to time, the City Council reallocates tax revenues M 0 among various funds established in the City budget. o co N M B. The purpose of this ordinance is to address the General Fund's N R 00 reliance on property taxes. Because property tax revenue is limited to 1% M annual growth, plus new construction, such revenue does not keep pace with L) the City's ongoing operational expenses within the General Fund. c a� E C. This ordinance reallocates revenue from the tax on water, Q a� sewer, and drainage utilities, and revenue from the B&O gross receipts and 0 square footage tax. These allocation revisions will better align the City's S L General Fund revenue sources with the City's ongoing operational expenses. o 0 c a� E 1 Amend KCC 3.18.020, KCC 3.28.010 r and KCC 3.28.130 Q re Fund Allocations for Tax Revenue Packet Pg. 189 4.H.a NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Q. ORDINANCE -°a a SECTION 1. - Amendment - KCC 3.18.020. Section 3.18.020 of the c Kent City Code, entitled "Certain utilities subject to tax," is amended as � follows: 0` c Sec. 3.18.020. Certain utilities subject to tax. c a� A. In addition to the other business and license fees required by the a a� ordinances of the city, the city levies upon all persons, firms, or corporations 0 (including the city) engaged in certain business activities a utilities tax to be collected as follows: N 1. Upon every person, firm, or corporation engaging in or carrying M on any telephone business within the city, an annual tax equal to six percent M of the total gross income, including revenues from intrastate toll, derived N M from the operation of such business within the city. This six percent tax will R be allocated as follows: 4.7 percent to the general fund, 0.3 percent to co M youth/teen programs, and one percent to street improvement programs. N R 00 2. Upon every person, firm, or corporation engaging in or carrying M on a business of selling, wheeling, furnishing, distributing, or producing gas, L) whether manufactured or natural, for commercial or domestic use or c purposes, a fee or tax equal to six percent of the total gross income from E Q such business in the city during the tax year for which the license is required. CD This six percent tax will be allocated as follows: 4.7 percent to the general c fund, 0.3 percent to youth/teen programs, and one percent to street 0 improvement programs. X c a� E 2 Amend KCC 3.18.020, KCC 3.28.010 r and KCC 3.28.130 Q re Fund Allocations for Tax Revenue Packet Pg. 190 4.H.a 3. Upon every person, firm, or corporation engaged in or carrying on the business of selling, wheeling, furnishing, or distributing electricity for light and power, a fee or tax equal to six percent of the total gross income a 0 from such business in the city during the tax year for which a license is a required. This six percent tax will be allocated as follows: 4.7 percent to the c general fund, 0.3 percent to youth/teen programs, and one percent to street improvement programs. 0 4. Upon every person, firm, or corporation engaged in or carrying a� on the business of providing cable television services, a tax equal to six E c percent of the total gross income from that business in the city during the E tax year for which the license is required. All revenue received from this tax must be applied only to funding the city's information technology L) x department operations and capital projects budgets in the proportion determined by the city council in its biennial budget, including all M M amendments. 0 M 5. Upon every person, firm, or corporation engaging in or carrying CO N on a business providing solid waste collection services, a tax equal to 18.4 M 0 percent of the total gross income from such business in the city during the o 00 tax year for which the license is required. This 18.4 percent tax will be M CM allocated as follows: 6.5 percent to the general fund, 0.3 percent to R 00 youth/teen programs, one percent to street improvement programs, and 10.6 percent to maintain and repair residential streets, including related Y impacts to curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and other road amenities, including c a) crosswalks along with necessary appurtenances, and improvements related E a to residential traffic calming, but this 10.6 percent portion of the solid waste c utility tax shall not be used to expand, extend, or widen existing residential c streets or to build new residential streets. The amount used from this fund o x for neighborhood traffic calming devices and crosswalks shall not exceed $150,000 in any year. a E 3 Amend KCC 3.18.020, KCC 3.28.010 r and KCC 3.28.130 Q re Fund Allocations for Tax Revenue Packet Pg. 191 4.H.a 6. Upon every person (including the city) engaging in or carrying on the business of selling, furnishing, or distributing water services, a tax equal to 13 percent of the total gross income from that business in the city a 0 during the tax year; upon every person (including the city) engaging in or Q carrying on the business of selling, furnishing, or distributing sewer services, c Cu a tax equal to 9.5 percent of the total gross income from that business in the city during the tax year; and upon every person (including the city) o engaging in or carrying on the business of selling, furnishing, or distributing a� drainage services, a tax equal to 19.5 percent of the total gross income from E c such business in the city during the tax year. Unless otherwise directed by E the city council in its budget process, the total of these tax revenues will be allocated as follows: 90.0043.85 percent to the general fund for the use as U x allocated in the city's budget; section;subject to the limitations provided On subsection (A)(6)(a) of this N M M • O M the / "ethercapital projects" fund subject to the ons ded t CO N 7.69 percent to street improvement M O programs; and 2.31 percent to youth/teen programs. o CO a. Unless otherwise allecated by N council, these funds mustM O N O O replacement,funding long and sheFt term haFdwaFe and seftwaFe M U U Y / / and signage only. c d E Q dedmeated to the / eapital i=eseurces fund feF the sele pui=pese ef Fetiripgy 0 c a" debt On the / prejeets fund; ng 3anuaFy �a L / 2023, er the fiFSt day of the year fellewing the date the debt an the etheF 0 K capital prejects fund fUlly whichever eccurs LL� / / r c� G V 4 Amend KCC 3.18.020, KCC 3.28.010 r and KCC 3.28.130 Q re Fund Allocations for Tax Revenue Packet Pg. 192 4.H.a 0. 0 B. In computing the tax provided in subsection (A) of this section, the Q taxpayer may deduct from total gross income the following items: c 1. The actual amount of credit losses and uncollectible receivables sustained by the taxpayer. o` 2. Amounts derived from transactions in interstate and foreign a� commerce which the city is prohibited from taxing under the laws and E c Constitution of the United States. 0 E Q a� SECTION 2. - Amendment - KCC 3.28.010. Section 3.28.010 of the 0 U Kent City Code, entitled "Purpose" is amended as follows: o� Sec. 3.28.010. Purpose. This chapter implements Washington M Constitution Article XI, Section 12 and RCW 35A.82.020 and 35A.11.020, M r which give municipalities the authority to license for revenue. In the absence N of a legal or constitutional prohibition, municipalities have the power to 0 define taxation categories as they see fit in order to respond to the unique o concerns and responsibilities of local government. The city ef Kent h o N O 7 M , U U Y c a� E the Q reity ne lengeF genei=ates N v this business c base, and te n9aintain and epeFate its eensidei=able pastS L O K / / and eperate r E V 5 Amend KCC 3.18.020, KCC 3.28.010 2 and KCC 3.28.130 Q re Fund Allocations for Tax Revenue Packet Pg. 193 4.H.a Q. SECTION 3. - Repeal - KCC 3.28.130. Section 3.28.130 of the Kent a City Code, entitled "Limitation of revenue received" is hereby repealed in its entirety. L SECTION 4. - Severability. If any one or more section, subsection, N or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance a� and the same shall remain in full force and effect. E a� SECTION 5. - Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon U x approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the M correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering; or M O M references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations. 00 N M SECTION 6. - Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be O in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law. co M O N O O M U November 15, 2022 Y DANA RALPH, MAYOR Date Approved13 a� E Q as ATTEST: c L O November 15, 2022 X KIMBERLEY A. KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted r c as E 6 Amend KCC 3.18.020, KCC 3.28.010 r and KCC 3.28.130 Q re Fund Allocations for Tax Revenue Packet Pg. 194 4.H.a November 18, 2022 Date Published r APPROVED AS TO FORM: -°a Q a� c CU TAMMY WHITE, CITY ATTORNEY L 0 N C d E C d E Q d O U x cc N M M O M r O N M O O O N M O N O O M U U Y c d E Q a� v c �a c L 0 K r E V 7 Amend KCC 3.18.020, KCC 3.28.010 r and KCC 3.28.130 Q re Fund Allocations for Tax Revenue Packet Pg. 195 4.1 FINANCE DEPARTMENT Paula Painter, CPA 220 Fourth Avenue South KENT Kent, WA 98032 WASHINGTON 253-856-5264 DATE: November 1, 2022 TO: Operations and Public Safety Committee SUBJECT: Property Tax Levy Ordinance - Adopt MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 44S0, approving the property tax levy ordinance for the 2023 budget. SUMMARY: This ordinance levies a property tax increase of 1.0 percent, which includes an increase of 1.0 percent on property, new construction and adjustments over the prior year. Property tax is limited to the growth of one percent plus new construction, which has been a major contributor to the structural imbalance in the General Fund. In order to assist in mitigating the structural imbalance, a shift of the City's reliance on property tax is needed. Currently, property tax only supports ongoing operating expenditures in the General Fund and makes up roughly 25 percent of the General Fund's total revenue. A portion of property tax revenues will be shifted to support the capital program, while all sales and B&O taxes and the majority of utility taxes will shift to only support the General Fund. These revenue streams most often reflect what is going on within the economy and should align more closely to inflation. Although it will not solve the entire structural imbalance, it will lessen its impact. This shift also allows the City to continue to honor our long-standing commitment to the business community and residents by providing dedicated funding for investment in our transportation and parks systems. The B&O tax and Utility tax ordinances will also be updated. BUDGET IMPACT: As described. SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Sustainable Services - Providing quality services through responsible financial management, economic growth, and partnerships. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Property Tax Levied 2023 (PDF) Packet Pg. 196 4.I.a r a 0 Q m ORDINANCE NO. 4450 m M N O N AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the w City of Kent, Washington, levying 2022 property o taxes for the first year of the 2023-2024 biennial budget for the City of Kent. J x R H N N O RECITALS a� A. Pursuant to RCW 84.55.120 and after providing all appropriate notice, the City Council held public hearings on October 4, 2022, and 0 October 18, 2022, to consider the City of Kent's proposed operating and capital biennial budget for the 2023 and 2024 calendar years, to address the City's property tax levy to be imposed in 2022 for collection in 2023, o and to review revenues and limit factors. ti N M M B. In accordance with RCW 84.55.120, any increase in property N O tax revenue other than that resulting from the addition of new construction aD and improvements to property; newly constructed wind turbines, solar, bio J mass, and geothermal facilities; annexations; and any increase in the value X of state-assessed property and the refund fund levy, requires the adoption i a� of an ordinance or resolution specifically authorizing the increase in terms o 0 of both dollars and percentage. a r c a� E C. Pursuant to RCW 84.52.010 and WAC 458-19-020, taxes shall be levied in specific dollar amounts. a 1 Property Tax Levied (1%) 2023 Budget Ordinance Packet Pg. 197 4.I.a NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: r a 0 ORDINANCE a a SECTION 1, - Recitals Incorporated. The foregoing recitals are incorporated into this ordinance. N O N SECTION 2, - Property Tax Levied. There is hereby levied against w L the assessed value of the property in the City of Kent, Washington, a tax to 0 be collected during the first year of the City's 2023-2024 biennial budget in J the following amount for the General Fund and the Capital Resources Fund, for the purpose of paying the general expenses of municipal government: o N t a1 Levy per $1,000 of assessed valuation 0 Q Fund (estimated) Dollar Amount General Fund $1.0608 $33,945,344 This property tax levy represents a 1.0% increase over last year as shown 0 below. N M M 2023 Regular Property Tax Levy $33,945,344 N 0 Less 2022 Regular Property Tax Levy ($33,042,361) N Less New Construction Levy ($487,514) °' Less Refund Levy ($85,045) (D Property Tax Increase $ 330,424 X % Change 1.0% a 0 L Unless otherwise directed by the City Council in its budget process, the total a c property tax revenues levied shall be allocated as follows: 47.5 percent to E the General Fund for the purpose of paying the general expenses of municipal government and 52.5 percent to the City's Capital Resources Fund a 2 Property Tax Levied (1%) 2023 Budget Ordinance Packet Pg. 198 4.I.a for use in one-time capital projects and debt repayment subject to the following three exceptions: A. Revenues shall be allocated to the City's Parks Department for 0. 0 the design, development, construction, maintenance, improvement and a renovation of City parks. Beginning in 2023, the amount shall total $2.75 million and increase by two percent each year thereafter. m M N O B. Revenues shall be allocated to the City's Public Works Department for the design, construction, maintenance, improvement, c 0 operation, and repair of the City's transportation infrastructure and a� appurtenant improvements. Beginning in 2023, the amount shall total J M $8.25 million and increase by two percent each year thereafter. N N O N C. Revenues shall be allocated to the City's Information a) Technology Capital Program directed at funding long- and short-term a hardware and software replacement. Beginning in 2023, the amount shall Q total $1.65 million and increase by two percent each year thereafter. 0 SECTION 3. - Limitation on Levy. The application of the General o Fund and Capital Resources Fund levy shall be consistent with and shall not N M result in tax revenue in excess of the limitation imposed by RCW sections M 84.55.010 and 84.55.0101. o N d SECTION 4. - Severability. If any one or more section, subsection, J or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance V_ a� and the same shall remain in full force and effect. o L SECTION 5. - Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the a 3 Property Tax Levied (1%) 2023 Budget Ordinance Packet Pg. 199 4.I.a correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering; or references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations. SECTION 6. - Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be a O in force five days after the date of its publication as provided for by RCW a 35A.11.090 and RCW 35A.12.130; however, the property tax levied through a� this ordinance shall not be assessed for collection until January 1, 2023. m M N O N N November 15, 2022 i DANA RALPH, MAYOR Date Approved .° as J ATTEST: N N O N November 15, 2022 0 KIMBERLEY A. KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted c November 18, 2022 0 Date Published Q U APPROVED AS TO FORM: 0 r� N M M TAMMY WHITE, CITY ATTORNEY N N d d J K cC H N O L E V Y Q 4 Property Tax Levied (I%) 2023 Budget Ordinance Packet Pg. 200 4.J FINANCE DEPARTMENT Paula Painter, CPA 220 Fourth Avenue South KENT Kent, WA 98032 WASHINGTON 253-856-5264 DATE: November 1, 2022 TO: Operations and Public Safety Committee SUBJECT: Ordinance Adopting the 2023-2024 Biennial Budget - Adopt MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4451, adopting the 2023-2024 biennial budget. SUMMARY: This ordinance adopts the final 2023-2024 biennial budget. The total gross expenditure budget for 2023 is $427,403,380 and 2024 is $424,660,100. A crosswalk from the Mayor's Proposed Budget to Council Adopted Budget is provided in Exhibits A & B to the ordinance. BUDGET IMPACT: As described. SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Evolving Infrastructure - Connecting people and places through strategic investments in physical and technological infrastructure. Thriving City - Creating safe neighborhoods, healthy people, vibrant commercial districts, and inviting parks and recreation. Sustainable Services - Providing quality services through responsible financial management, economic growth, and partnerships. Inclusive Community - Embracing our diversity and advancing equity through genuine community engagement. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Budget Adoption-2023-24 Ordinance (PDF) Packet Pg. 201 4.J.a a O Q r ORDINANCE NO. 4451 m AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, relating to budgets and finance and adopting the final 2023-2024 biennial o budget. M N O N N RECITALS r c r A. Tax estimates and the preliminary budget for the City of Kent, o Washington, for the 2023-2024 biennial years have been prepared and filed a a� as provided by law, and the budget has been printed and distributed. c L B. Notice has been published in the official paper of the City of Kent setting the time and place for public hearings on the budget. The M notice also stated that all taxpayers calling at the Office of the City Clerk would be furnished a copy of the 2023-2024 biennial budget. CU L O C. Public hearings were held on October 4, 2022, and N October 18, 2022. o N O NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, c WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: a a a� m ORDINANCE as E SECTION 1. - Budget Adoption. Pursuant to RCW 35A.34.120, the M budget for the 2023-2024 biennium, as summarized in Exhibit "A" and as a 1 2023-2024 Biennial Budget Adoption Ordinance Packet Pg. 202 4.J.a set forth in the 2023-2024 biennial Preliminary Comprehensive Budget, which is on file with the city clerk and which is amended by Exhibit "B", all of which are incorporated into this ordinance by this reference, is hereby a adopted in the amounts and for the purposes established in that budget as .°a a the final budget for the City's 2023-2024 biennium. a� SECTION 2. - Transmittal. The finance director shall transmit a 00 complete copy of the final adopted budget to the Division of Municipal Corporations in the Office of the State Auditor and to the Association of N Washington Cities. N M N O N SECTION 3. - Bud-get Administration. City administration shall administer the biennial budget and may authorize expenditures, Q. appropriations, and transfers pursuant to RCW 35A.34.200 and as otherwise a provided by law. c c SECTION 4. - Severability. If any one or more section, subsection, o or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such M M decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this a� ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. cc L O SECTION 5. - Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon N approval of the city attorney, the clerk and the code reviser are authorized N N to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of o clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering or lettering; or c references to other local, state, or federal laws, code, or regulations. Q SECTION 6. - Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be 00 c in force January 1, 2023, which is more than five days after its publication, as provided by law. U a 2 2023-2024 Biennial Budget Adoption Ordinance Packet Pg. 203 4.J.a November 15, 2022 DANA RALPH, MAYOR Date Approved a O ATTEST: Q a� November 15, 2022 m KIMBERLEY A. KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted November 18, 2022 Date Published 00 N O N M APPROVED AS TO FORM: o N d t r a1 C r TAMMY WHITE, CITY ATTORNEY o a L 0 r M M M V C R C L 0 N M N O N C O Q O Q d a1 3 m C O E L v R r Q 3 2023-2024 Biennial Budget Adoption Ordinance Packet Pg. 204 4.J.a 2023-24 Biennial Budget Exhibit A 2023 Proposed 2024 Proposed Expenditures Expenditures +, Governmental Funds Q- 0 General Fund 115,783,520 119,336,150 Q Special Revenue Funds Street Operating Fund 21,142,650 21,112,910 LEOFF1 Retiree Benefits Fund 1,581,160 1,612,800 m Lodging Tax Fund 268,880 274,520 f° .0 Youth/Teen Fund 1,049,920 1,076,330 0 Capital Resources Fund 33,710,900 35,106,530 pp Criminal Justice Fund 13,191,700 12,271,270 N Human Services Fund 7,797,930 7,836,840 G N City Arts Program Fund 112,700 107,930 M ShoWare Operating Fund 3,429,620 1,300,350 N Debt Service Funds r Non-Voted Debt Service Fund 8,259,280 7,813,060 a) Special Assessments Fund 207,840 198,030 0 r Q. Capital Projects Funds Q Street Capital Projects Fund 8,083,650 8,188,550 0 Parks Capital Projects Fund 5,105,010 5,297,530 0 c Other Capital Projects Fund 1,300,730 1,000,180 c Technology Capital Projects Fund 4,437,760 3,388,760 'a Facilities Capital Projects Fund 16,373,730 15,844,720 O Proprietary Funds M M M Enterprise Funds Water Fund 39,685,770 43,327,600 c0i Sewer Fund 41,987,000 40,236,960 CU Drainage Fund 40,819,430 35,396,630 S Solid Waste Fund 836,970 874,800 p Golf Complex Fund 3,793,160 3,238,660 N Internal Service Funds N Fleet Services Fund 8,184,380 7,255,600 N Central Services Fund 0 Central Stores 375,610 383,670 a Multimedia 1,069,090 1,119,250 0 Information Technology 11,828,630 12,472,820 Q Facilities Fund 8,436,730 8,468,970 a� Insurance Fund Unemployment 205,260 207,250 m Workers Compensation 2,380,640 2,670,670 Health and Employee Wellness 15,893,380 16,530,970 0 Liability Insurance 4,610,190 5,058,720 Property Insurance 914,090 1,001,100 r Fiduciary Funds Q Firefighters Pension Fund 395,230 395,360 Impact Fee Trust Fund 4,150,840 4,254,610 Total Gross Budget 427,403,380 424,660,100 Packet Pg. 205 4.J.a 2023-24 Biennial Budget Exhibit B 2023 2023 2024 2024 Revenues Expenditures Revenues Expenditures Governmental Funds General Fund 115,388,650 115,783,520 116,249,370 119,336,150 O Special Revenue Funds Q Street Operating Fund 20,935,310 21,142,650 21,255,480 21,112,910 r LEOFFI Retiree Benefits Fund 1,289,890 1,581,160 1,310,470 1,612,800 Lodging Tax Fund 280,260 268,880 285,830 274,520 7 Youth/Teen Fund 1,049,920 1,049,920 1,076,330 1,076,330 m Capital Resources Fund 27,447,170 33,710,900 26,828,450 35,106,530 Criminal Justice Fund 10,298,340 13,191,700 12,078,290 12,271,270 Human Services Fund 7,797,930 7,797,930 7,836,840 7,836,840 m City Arts Program Fund 112,700 112,700 107,930 107,930 N ShoWare Operating Fund 1,150,000 3,429,620 1,150,000 1,300,350 O N Debt Service Funds M N Non-Voted Debt Service Fund 7,558,440 8,259,280 7,401,000 7,813,060 N Special Assessments Fund 215,940 207,840 205,250 198,030 t Capital Projects Funds Street Capital Projects Fund 8,091,880 8,083,650 8,196,790 8,188,550 Parks Capital Projects Fund 5,162,310 5,105,010 5,359,060 5,297,530 rL Other Capital Projects Fund 1,309,250 1,300,730 1,009,250 1,000,180 -0 Technology Capital Projects Fund 4,410,750 4,437,760 3,361,070 3,388,760 Facilities Capital Projects Fund 16,398,580 16,373,730 15,870,850 15,844,720 v C Proprietary Funds C Enterprise Funds Water Fund 38,832,630 39,685,770 41,385,930 43,327,600 O Sewer Fund 40,468,820 41,987,000 40,277,700 40,236,960 Drainage Fund 36,436,680 40,819,430 34,339,640 35,396,630 CO) M Solid Waste Fund 726,670 836,970 744,780 874,800 Golf Complex Fund 4,186,720 3,793,160 3,609,396 3,238,660 v C Internal Service Funds cC Fleet Services Fund 8,206,270 8,184,380 7,118,200 7,255,600 S Central Services Fund L Central Stores 370,960 375,610 378,820 383,670 Iq Multimedia 1,065,680 1,069,090 1,114,770 1,119,250 N CO) Information Technology 11,828,630 11,828,630 12,472,820 12,472,820 N O Facilities Fund 7,766,370 8,436,730 7,877,020 8,468,970 N C Insurance Fund O Unemployment 168,370 205,260 168,370 207,250 Q Workers Compensation 1,761,030 2,380,640 2,105,970 2,670,670 G Health and Employee Wellness 16,286,430 15,893,380 16,726,410 16,530,970 Q Liability Insurance 4,007,230 4,610,190 5,201,850 5,058,720 Property Insurance 940,320 914,090 1,033,850 1,001,100 3 m Fiduciary Funds Firefighters Pension Fund 378,380 395,230 387,250 395,360 N Impact Fee Trust Fund 4,150,840 4,150,840 4,254,610 4,254,610 E t Total Gross Budget 406,479,350 427,403,380 408,779,646 424,660,100 v M r r Q Packet Pg. 206