Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Regular Agenda - 10/19/2021 KENT CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Tuesday, October 19, 2021 7:00 PM Chambers Masks are required regardless of vaccination status. A live broadcast is available on Kent TV21, www.facebook.com/CityofKent, and www.youtube.com/user/KentTV21 To listen to this meeting, call 1-888-475-4499 or 1-877-853-5257 and enter Meeting ID 842 7535 7107 Mayor Dana Ralph Council President Toni Troutner Councilmember Bill Boyce Councilmember Marli Larimer Councilmember Brenda Fincher Councilmember Zandria Michaud Councilmember Satwinder Kaur Councilmember Les Thomas ************************************************************** COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 7 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2. ROLL CALL 3. AGENDA APPROVAL Changes from Council, Administration, or Staff. 4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A. Public Recognition 1. Proclamation Declaring October Domestic Violence Awareness Month 2. Reappointments to Kent Parks and Recreation Commission B. Community Events C. Public Safety Report 5. REPORTS FROM COUNCIL AND STAFF A. Mayor Ralph's Report B. Chief Administrative Officer's Report City Council Meeting City Council Regular Meeting October 19, 2021 C. Councilmembers' Reports 6. PUBLIC HEARING A. Second Public Hearing on the 2022 Mid-Biennium Budget Adjustment B. Second Public Hearing on the Capital Improvement Program C. Public Hearing on the 2021 Tax Levy for the 2022 Budget D. Public Hearing on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Incorporate School District Capital Facilities Plans into the Capital Facilities Element E. Public Hearing on the Comprehensive Plan Amendement to Incorporate the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Plan into the Capital Facilities Element 7. PUBLIC COMMENT The Public Comment period is your opportunity to speak to the Council and Mayor on issues that relate to the business of the city of Kent or to agenda items Council will consider at this meeting. Comments that do not relate to the business of the city of Kent are not permitted. Additionally, the state of Washington prohibits people from using this Public Comment period to support or oppose a ballot measure or candidate for office. If you wish to provide comment to the Mayor and Council at this meeting, please contact the City Clerk by 4 p.m. on the day of the meeting at 253-856-5725 or CityClerk@KentWA.gov. If you intend to speak in person, please see the Clerk at the beginning of the meeting to sign up. When called to speak during the meeting, please state your name and city of residence for the record. You will have up to three minutes to provide comment. Please address all comments to the Mayor and Council as a whole. The Mayor and Council may not be in a position to answer questions during the meeting. Alternatively, you may email the Mayor and Council at Mayor@KentWA.gov and CityCouncil@KentWA.gov. Emails are not read into the record. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of Minutes 1. Council Workshop - Workshop Regular Meeting - Oct 5, 2021 5:00 PM 2. City Council Meeting - City Council Regular Meeting - Oct 5, 2021 7:00 PM B. Payment of Bills - Authorize C. Accept the South 192nd Street Sanitary Sewer Project as Complete - Authorize D. 2022 South King Housing and Homelessness Partners Work Plan - Approve E. 2022 South King Housing and Homelessness Partners Budget - Approve F. Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award G. Reappointments to the Kent Parks and Recreation Commission - Confirm 9. OTHER BUSINESS City Council Meeting City Council Regular Meeting October 19, 2021 10. BIDS 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION AND ACTION AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION 12. ADJOURNMENT NOTE: A copy of the full agenda is available in the City Clerk's Office and at KentWA.gov. Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City Clerk's Office in advance at 253-856-5725. For TDD relay service, call the Washington Telecommunications Relay Service 7-1-1. wHEREAS, wHEREAS, WHEREAS, wHEREAS, wHEREAS, PROCLAMATION National Domestic Violence Awareness Month was established in October 1987 to acknowledge and provide a voice for domestic violence victims and survivors, to advocate for legislation and protections for victims, to educate leaders and to encourage public awareness and action against abuse; and domestic violence is prevalent in every community and, on average, nearly 20 people per minute are physically abused by an intimate partner in the United States; and domestic violence is a pattern of physical, emotional, verbal and/or sexual abuse that affects millions, regardless of race, gender, religion, occupation, educational level, socio-economic status or sexual orientation; and the City of Kent remains committed to a professional response to incidents of domestic violence and strives to change belief systems and practices that support violence and abuse that disproportionately affects women and other marginalized people; and becoming a place where all people embrace the spirit of non-violence, and where people develop healthy relationships based on mutual respect requires the participation and commitment of the entire community; NOW, THEREFORE I, DANA RALPH, MAYOR OF KENT, DO HEREBY PROCLAIM OCTOBER 2021 TO BE Domestic Violence Awareness Month In Kent Washington and encourage all residents to join us in raising awareness of domestic violence by wearing purple on Thursday, October 21 and sharing your photo on social media. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand this 19th day of October,2O2L. KENTWasHrNcrox Mayor Ralph 4.A.1 Packet Pg. 4 Communication: Proclamation Declaring October Domestic Violence Awareness Month (Public Recognition) Page 1 of 8 Administration • The City Council’s mid-biennium budget process continues with a workshop October 19, followed by budget related agenda items at the November 2 Operations & Public Safety Committee meeting, and then final adoption November 16. This year’s process is more complex than a typical mid-biennium budget process due to federal American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) dollars and additional capital dollars. • Contract lobbyist Briahna Murray will present a proposed 2022 legislative agenda to the Operations & Public Safety Committee November 2. • The Sound Cities Association is accepting applications through November 4 for appointment/reappointment to most regional forums. Executive Assistant Cathie Everett will assist with the application process for Kent’s mayor and councilmembers. Communications • More awards! The team won 13 awards from NATOA (National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors)! The Government Programming Awards (GPAs) are annual awards that recognize excellence in broadcast, cable, multimedia and electronic programming produced by local government agencies. Congratulations to the team on these national awards! • Website refresh update: the final design and site map for the website are approved and off to the development and implementation phase. Thank you to each department for making the website makeover a priority! Stay-tuned for the official launch date. Upcoming events: • Hops with Cops, Half Lion at Riverbend, Thurs., Oct. 14, 5:30–7:30 p.m. • Turkey Challenge: Accepting food and monetary donations to benefit the Kent Food Bank. Drop-off box in the lobby of City Hall starting Nov. 1. • Dining with Derek featuring Municipal Court Judge, Anthony Gipe, online via TEAMS, Wed., Nov. 17, 12-1 p.m. Race and Equity • The CORE team decided on the five areas of focus for the strategic plan. The decision was made by using a data driven approach. The five areas will be Communication, Equitable Representation, Training, Community Engagement, and In-Language resources. • Seven employees were able to participate in the “From Home to Home” exhibit that was put together by World Relief Seattle. The exhibit provided participants with an interactive experience that mirrored the refugee resettlement process that many of our Kent residents have gone through. Economic Development • Along with King County’s Local Food Economy Manager, staff reviewed preliminary survey feedback with New Venture Advisors, the consultants retained to develop a workplan, and conduct research to determine viability of a Kent ADMINISTRATION ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT October 19, 2021 5.B Packet Pg. 5 Communication: Chief Administrative Officer's Report (Reports from Council and Staff) Page 2 of 8 Valley Food Entrepreneurship Center, a multi-functional, shared-use facility that would serve the region through skill and wage progression, job training, entrepreneurial support, and community development. Staff is promoting continual survey work and encouraging local food industry stakeholders’ participation in a series of design charettes taking place the week of October 18. • In partnership with the National Development Council, development of a directory of South King County small business technical assistance providers is nearly complete. Anticipated by the end of October, this new directory will include a description of the specific types of technical support provided by the numerous providers in the region, guidance on how to access their services, as well as their language capabilities. The directory will be translated into Kent’s top 10 languages, and provided to a network of community- based organizations, community leaders and service providers to assist in service delivery and referral making, with a particular focus on BIPOC business entrepreneurs/owners. • Staff met with the leadership of the Washington Alliance for Better Schools, a collaborative of school districts and industry leaders aiming to leverage resources, talent, and intellectual capital to help students graduate career and college ready. Discussions primarily covered strategies to connect Kent’s students to the regions’ many high-tech advanced- manufacturing career opportunities. • After an introduction by Washington State Senator Lisa Wellman, Chair of the Senate Education Committee, staff met with leadership of the Seattle Universal Math Museum, a non-profit organization aiming to provide an opportunity for children to experience math hands-on in ways that feel like play. The group is interested in the opportunity provided by a potential advanced technology learning center at the Naden property. • Staff connected leadership at Farestart, a non-profit focused on disrupting poverty through life skills and job training in the food industry, to the kitchen and catering team at accesso ShoWare Center in an effort to assist with their labor shortage. • After a year-long hiatus, Kent’s Lodging Tax Advisory Committee met for the first time since the pandemic began. With business travel driving most of the revenues making up the Lodging Tax Fund, the group has been unable to offer business or tourism grants. Besides reviewing the still significantly reduced budget and the financial outlook, staff provided an overview of the changes to the City’s Boards and Commissions ordinance and its impact on committee membership. • Outreach continues to Kent’s business community to ensure all are aware of the October 25 effective date for King County’s vaccination mandate. This Health Order applies to: o Outdoor events with 500 people or more – such as professional and collegiate sports and entertainment events o Indoor entertainment and recreational events or establishments – such as professional and collegiate sports, entertainment, performing arts, museums, theatre, live music, gyms, and conferences/conventions. o Restaurants and bars (including indoor dining) – this does not apply to outdoor dining, take-out customers, and places that aren't primarily used as a restaurant, such as grocery stores. Rental Housing Inspection Program • RHIP unfortunately lost its sole staff member Katie Whaley in September, who moved to Denver, Colorado to be near family. Katie did an excellent job getting RHIP off the ground in its first three years and will be sorely missed. Recruiting is underway, and Current Planning Manager Erin George will present a program update to ECDC in November. • Despite Katie’s departure, RHIP inspections continue. Pandemic related financial challenges slowed down program compliance, and due dates were extended for properties which have demonstrated progress. As of October 12, 71% of properties in the West Hill & Valley have 5.B Packet Pg. 6 Communication: Chief Administrative Officer's Report (Reports from Council and Staff) Page 3 of 8 completed inspections and all required repairs. The remaining properties are working through repairs, and only a handful are non-responsive and thus receiving code enforcement notices. The SE Hill sector of the city (its largest, with the most properties and units) has started inspections, but only 8% have been completed to date. • After learning that other cities were not requiring expansion tanks on water heaters, a change to the City of Kent policy was implemented recently. While expansion tanks are required by current code when individual water heaters are replaced, they are not a life safety item and requiring landlords to install these on all inspected units at once is financially burdensome. The goal of RHIP is not to bring all complexes up to current code (which would be impossibly expensive), but to improve the health and safety of rental units. Accordingly, RHIP inspectors will only be required to check existing tanks for temperature & pressure valves which do relate to health and safety. Current Planning • The Current Planning Division welcomes Nate Schildmeyer as its new Senior Planner. Nate worked most recently for the City of Bonney Lake and was with Bainbridge Island before that. Nate brings years of land use permitting experience to serve Kent’s residents and developers. • The Current Planners are hard at work reviewing a high volume of land use, design review, building, and construction permits. Planners also respond to daily zoning and development related questions from Kent residents and investors. Customer inquiry volumes currently average around 150 questions per week, shared among four planners. • The third and final workshop for the Mayor’s proposed 2022 mid-biennium budget adjustment will be on October 19 at 5 pm. The first public hearing for the 2022 property tax levy and second public hearing for the 2022 budget adjustment and 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) will be held on October 19 at the 7 pm Council meeting. • The Financial Planning Division is working on 3rd quarter reports, monthly reports, third quarter supplemental budget adjustment, phase three of performance measures, final adjustments for 2022 budget amendment, and grant audits, applications, and reimbursements. Workday • Continue design and configuration to streamline processes and procedures for the LEAN temporary hiring project. • Setup, testing and training on the I-9 eVerify process for department liaisons. • Configuration and testing of year-end processes, i.e. open enrollment, ACA reporting, W2 reporting. • We’ve had 189 items logged on the issue tracker: 118 closed, 21 in progress and 50 are open. • Monthly statistics: o 7808 business process events initiated o 99 business processes completed including new hires, terminations and job changes o 510 employee benefits business processes completed, including retirement savings changes, addition of dependents to an enrollment, new enrollments, and changes to eligibility o 316 business process events that were initiated by a manager during the selected month Benefits • Open enrollment for City benefits will begin October 29 and run through November 12. • LEOFF1 Board will be recruiting for a member-at-large position. • Washington Cares Act exemption window opened October 1. Please log on to the state’s site if you have a private plan to request an exemption. Information Technology Projects • MySeniorCenter.com deployment– to provide a means by which the Parks and FINANCE HR IT 5.B Packet Pg. 7 Communication: Chief Administrative Officer's Report (Reports from Council and Staff) Page 4 of 8 Recreation Department can capture usage data at the Kent Senior Center to include critical demographic characteristics. This usage data will allow the Parks and Recreation Department to support the application for the King County Veterans Seniors Human Service (VSHS) Levy and track both participation and volunteer hours. • Multi-Factor authentication implementation - to implement Microsoft Azure’s multi- factor authentication (MFA) to improve the security posture for enterprise users, applications, and data. Information Technology operational support for October 03, 2021 to October 12, 2021 • Number of tickets opened – 121 • Number of tickets closed – 128 Enterprise GIS General: • Continued normalization of address database • Data normalization for Amanda deployment including creation of an embedded webmap • EGIS Intern working on updating outward facing Kent GeoPortal data and maps • Assisting with GIS needs for CMS refresh project including various rest endpoints • Rearchitected plan for GIS system citywide kick-off meeting being setup • Working with PW GIS on impervious surface workflow citywide • Meeting with Police for training on SafeCam application management and use Weekly Customer Service Requests: • Monthly GIS data update • Providing customer support to help staff connect to GIS data • Managing AutoCAD license renewal • Managing ArcGIS Esri license requests • EGIS participating in citywide software implementations and providing GIS support • Continue to advise the Police Department regarding the impacts and implementation of various police reform bills. • The Prosecution team is busy working through the backlog of jury trials that resulted from the COVID crisis. The team anticipates the backlog will be substantially cleared by the end of October. Kent will likely be in a better position from a case backlog perspective than any other agency in Washington. During the pandemic, while most other agencies in Washington curtailed the prosecution of cases, Kent prosecutors (in partnership with the Kent Municipal Court and Kent public defenders) continued to file and process cases. Involved Kent departments and partners did this with existing staff. This is in comparison to the county where thousands of cases are backlogged, and tens of millions of dollars are being allocated to resolve the backlog. • Continued to provide legal support for issues arising in the remediation and mitigation of wetlands. • Assisted staff in drafting the contract to paint the mural on the new West Hill Reservoir. • Continued to assist the Clerk’s office with public records requests as needed, and Public Works, ECD, IT and Parks with a number of high priority contracts and development projects, including property rights and access issues involving Naden Avenue. • Assisted the Clerk’s Office in preparing the agenda for the City Council meetings and committee meetings. • Assisted the HR Department in a number of sensitive employment and labor related matters. Recreation and Cultural Services • 2021-2022 Spotlight Series tickets are on sale. Collision of Rhythm kicked off the season on Saturday, October 9 with a performance featuring drumming, juggling, tap dancing, and music. As of October 8, 115 tickets had been sold. With socially distant seating rules in place for this performance, only a handful of tickets remain. Collision of Rhythm also conducted a class for intermediate and advanced tap dance students at Allegro Performing Arts Academy on the morning of October 9. LAW PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY SERVICES 5.B Packet Pg. 8 Communication: Chief Administrative Officer's Report (Reports from Council and Staff) Page 5 of 8 • Kent Creates is hosting an online exhibit around the theme “Free to Roam.” The exhibit is accepting submissions in all mediums through November 30. • Centennial Gallery is featuring paintings by Ian Shearer and Tsehaye Hadish through October 29. • Staff is recruiting for new Arts Commissioners to fill four positions that will be vacated in October by members who are ineligible to serve additional terms according to the new Boards and Commissions policy. Staff and the current Commission Vice Chair are interviewing the seven candidates who submitted applications and hope to have recommendations to the Mayor by October 15. • Fall Quarter Adaptive Recreation programs are off to a great start. Studio 315, a social club for adults with disabilities is back after a nearly two-year COVID hiatus. Participants are excited to be together again while engaging in meaningful and fun activities. Staff are creatively and patiently helping everyone remember to socially distance and keep masks on. • Youth and Teen staff returned to hands on programs in several elementary schools and middle schools October 11. Recruiting part-time staff has been challenging due to limited qualified applicants and made further challenging by vaccination mandates. Full-time staff have worked creatively to conduct recruitment outreach to job fairs, face to face contact at local high schools and colleges, promoting job opportunities on the new reader board at Kent Meridian High School’s French Field and volunteering to work with local Key Clubs running the concession stand during the Thursday and Friday night football games at French Field in hopes of recruiting more staff. This ongoing recruitment outreach is carried out along with their regular work including planning, organizing, and engaging with school administration and other community partners to restore recreation programming and services for youth, teens, and families in Kent. Staff Changes - Hiring/Retirement/ Recruitment/Leaves/Promotions • Officer Jacob Reed’s last day was Oct. 1. • We have extended three conditional offers to entry level officers. Significant crime activities/arrests /investigations • On October 1, at 10:00 am, a 75-year-old male victim confronts suspects prowling vehicles at Scenic Vista Senior Apts. Another suspect gets out of the car with what appeared to be a rifle without a buttstock. He threatened to shoot the victim. The victim, fearing he will get shot, closes the distance and punches suspect in the face. The suspect backs off and the suspects leave in the suspect vehicle. • On October 6, at 4:49 am, officers were dispatched to a suspicious vehicle at McChevron. The description of the vehicle was on a recent bulletin about a series of armed robberies and thefts/attempted thefts, including trying to steal an ATM, in Kent and surrounding agencies. Officers detained the suspects and impounded the vehicle. Detectives interviewed one of the suspects and eventually both were booked for several charges related to the string of crimes. • FOLLOW-UP from September 22, at 2:08 pm, a male suspect entered the Catholic Store at 1st and Gowe, then proceeded to assault the 70-year-old female employee by knocking her down then punching and kicking her in the head. He also was groping her during the assault, all of which lasted almost two minutes. He quickly ran out of the store in an unknown direction. On October 8, the suspect was brought in by family and surrendered after the photo and video was shown on Crime Stoppers. • On October 8, at 11:37 pm, Officers responded to an alarm at the 76 Station, 21208 68 AVE S. The glass front door was smashed out and a suspect inside the building was loading tobacco products inside a small garbage can. The suspect then exited the store with product in hand and was confronted by Officers. The POLICE 5.B Packet Pg. 9 Communication: Chief Administrative Officer's Report (Reports from Council and Staff) Page 6 of 8 suspect set the garbage can down and attempted to flee on foot. Officers tased the suspect and he was taken into custody and booked into King County Jail. Land Survey/PW GIS • Land Survey field staff have completed design topography mapping for the following projects: 2022 watermain, 3rd Ave. pump station and Hytek grading quantities. Field crews provided construction staking for the 2021 watermain projects. Land Survey office staff completed right of way calculations, reviewed future Capital Improvement Project design plans and drafted legal descriptions for easements. • Public Works GIS staff have performed regular data editing and maintenance as required on city utility infrastructure; fulfilled Cityworks work orders; supported ArcGIS collector use for storm water inspections, SCADA and storm hotspots; completed assigned public records requests and updated the LID viewer app. Design • Sanitary sewer comp plan: gathering information to prepare an RFP. Reviewed grant opportunities to prepare for future grants. • 144th Ave Southeast improvements: stream gauge to be placed to monitor depth(s) over the wet season. Team seeking topo data. Investigating options for roadway materials. • 2022 watermain upgrades: 90% for State and 60% for Benson locations is underway and expected to be distributed end of October. • EVH 212th to 196th overlay: 90% review distributed Oct 11. Review comments due Friday Oct 31. • Downey Farmstead Restoration – final phase: floodplains by design agreement returned to Ecology. Preparing to bring the agreement to an upcoming PW Committee. Continued design on habitat structures, and coordination with Parks on road/trail separation. Further coordination with King County about release of easements. • Mill Creek at 76th Ave flood protection improvements: 60% review package distributed. Comments due Oct 15th. Submitted regional sub-opportunity grant application to King County Flood Control District. • 81st pumpstation and force main: discussed layout options with Ops and identified preferred footprint of pumpstation. Developing updated estimate. • Kent Springs transmission main repair: met with lining contractor to evaluate feasibility of lining the segment. Determined not a good candidate for lining. Chem grout option may be option if the location of the leak is known. • Meeker Street at 64th and Kent Elementary: 30% design review distributed Oct 11. Comments due Friday Oct 31. Construction • Clark Springs generator and electrical upgrades: pulled wire in underground electrical. Erection of the generator shelter and catwalk is ongoing. Light pole installation took place on Monday and Tuesday (10/11 & 10/12). Monday (10/18), the project will be suspended for procurement of long lead materials related to the power source and controls. • West Hill reservoir: contractor welding the 2nd of 18 wall steel sheet courses. 38th Ave S is closed between S 248th St and S 247th St for the duration of the project. Pedestrian access through this closure will be maintained. • Lake Fenwick hypolimnetic aerator improvements: Monday (10/17) the contractor started placement of new walls and roof. • 2021 watermain replacement: Titus Ave curbing and pressure testing complete, chlorine injection happened on 10/11, and purities came back on 10/12 and 10/13. Connection to the existing main on Central Ave at Titus scheduled for Saturday, 10/16. The Railroad Ave connection was scheduled for the following Saturday (10/23). Installation of the new watermain on Saar will began on Wednesday (10/13). • 2021 asphalt overlays: demo ramps on 256th, utility raising on Woodland, concrete flatwork on 208th completed. Due PUBLIC WORKS 5.B Packet Pg. 10 Communication: Chief Administrative Officer's Report (Reports from Council and Staff) Page 7 of 8 to a shortage of MMA materials temporary pain striping to be placed in lieu of MMA expected to occur later this week or early next…weather dependent. Work occurring at multiple locations. MMA placement will be schedule upon receipt of materials (weather permitting). • S 224th Street projects wetland mitigation and remediation: material sample testing results for contaminants is resulting in expanded excavation zones. Excavation of the expanded zones is ongoing and will continue. The south section of the property is expected to test clean this week. The effort will move to the North property once the South is determined to be clean of contaminants. Drainage system cleaning and storm bypass system installation scheduled for 10/13/2021. Topsoil placement began 10/12/2021 on the South section of the property. Spraying for mitigation in the South has begun. Environmental • October recycle event – the final recycle event of 2021 was scheduled for Saturday, October 16th at Hogan Park from 9 am to 3 pm. This is a free event open to all King County residents. Brochures have been mailed to 64,000 residents. • Winter season flood prep – the Corps of Engineers held their annual Green River Watershed Winter Coordination meeting on October 6 and the dam is operating normally. King County is holding their Winter season prep meeting on October 19 • Cross connection control program – customer coordination/on-site meetings/permit review this week – Signature Pte Apts, All Freight Solutions, Bridge Point, St. James Episcopal, Puget Sound Energy, Rich’s Place, Flow International, Earl Jorgensen, O’Brien Commerce, Prologis, Pozzi Bros, Woodland Estates, 76th Ave S. CIP Streets • Street maintenance is finishing up paving season with crack sealing for 2021 inhouse paving locations Citywide. They have performed a hot patch repair on Kennebeck between Ward St and Gowe St, prepped for sidewalk pour on S 259th Pl, sidewalk repairs on Reith Rd, 104th Ave SE and SE 256th St, Joe Jackson Bridge cleanup and graffiti removal, installed pylons on E James St and installed curb separators on SE 240th St and on 104th Ave SE • Signs and Markings completed sign maintenance on the East and West Hills, replaced c-curb markers Citywide, sign repair on Jason Ave and set bases for sign repairs on Frager Rd, S 196th St, 216th St, Riverview Blvd, 72nd Ave S and 68th Ave S • Solid Waste removed debris on 80th Pl and on S 196th St • Water vegetation line trimmed and picked up litter at the Clark Springs fence line, Kent POD #3, 640 Zone Tank, Kent Springs, 212th Treatment Plant, 208th Well, Summit Reservoir, 108th Well, O’Brien Well, Guiberson facility and the Woodland Way PRV • Street vegetation weeded and removed debris on 218th and on Orillia Rd. The sidearms mowed on the 212th hill, Meeker St, 204th, Orillia Rd, 192nd, 196th, 72nd, 80th and on Frager Rd. They also installed a fence and gate along Kent Kangley Rd for the sewer station. Wetland mitigation winterized irrigation at mitigation sites, performed barn road mitigation planting and collected seeds Wetland maintenance mowed and line trimmed Maplewood Grove on 108th Ave SE, Redondo on 27th Ave S, Signal Electric on 3rd Ave S, 72nd Ave diversion channel on 68th Ave S, ShoWare Center on 4th Ave N , at Horseshoe Bend on 80th Ave S, Glenmar on 124th Ave SE and Kingstone South on 114th Ave SE. Holding Pond crew mowed and line trimmed at Muth on S 212th St, the Pac Hwy Ponds off of S 260th St, KDM Midway, 3rd Ave S, Sophia Glen on 90th Pl S, Briarmount on S 202nd St, Punjab on 35th Pl, Boeing on 68th Ave S, S 196th Corridor, E Valley Hwy BS on S 192nd St, Whitney Heights on 92nd Ave S, Brenna’s Vista on S 200th Pl, S 203rd Short Plat, Wildwood on SE 233rd St, Meagan’s Meadow on 132nd Ave SE and Birchwood Acres on SE 235th St Water • Staff have completed the water main installation on 5th Ave S at Rachel Place and have been installing the new water 5.B Packet Pg. 11 Communication: Chief Administrative Officer's Report (Reports from Council and Staff) Page 8 of 8 service lines for the customers. Staff continue work on Kennebeck Ave at E Ward St and E Meeker St to increase fire flow availability across the valley water system. 12-inch connections to a 16-inch water main will be made and tied into the water mains on E Ward St and E Meeker St and will be used for future water main improvements, tie-ins were being performed the week of October 11th. Chlorine injections and purities for the Titus St water main contractor have begun and the 2022 water treatment chemical bids have gone out. Summer water demands are decreasing, and staff are beginning to perform maintenance activities on water source meters Storm/Sewer • Storm crews installed a culvert at 923 3rd Ave, installed a berm at 1121 E Smith St, performed a sawcut and line repair at 132nd Ave SE, vault inspections Citywide and storm line cleaning for the 2022 overlays on SE 200th St and on 124th Ave SE. Crews also performed National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) assessing on SE 259th Pl, on SE 269th St and on 116th Ave SE and NPDES pumping on 102nd Pl SE and on 121st Ave SE • Sewer crews performed a manhole installation at 18425 68th Ave S, a change out on SE 244th and also on 100th Ave, performed painting at Lindental, cleared and graded the access road and worked on upgrades. They also worked on the GRNRA shelf plan and contract work, cleaned the wash rack in the Shops yard, cleaned the Golf catch basin, TV’d for 2022 overlays on 112th Ave SE and on SE 256th St and cleaned the sewer lines on 112th Ave SE. Fleet/Warehouse • The Warehouse crew continued to assist with CDL training and perform forklift trainings, maintained the shops yard, keeping it clean and free of litter and debris, cleaned and maintained the wash rack, washed and vacuumed motor pool vehicles, issued Personal Protection Equipment (PPE’s) and motor pool vehicles to staff and hydrant meters and public notice boards to contractors, repaired small equipment as needed, received parts and inventory orders, continued to manually open and close the broken East Gate daily as well as set out and remove the Type 3 barricades in the employee south parking lot at the beginning and close of the work day and worked at the recycle event held at Hogan’s Park on October 16th. • Fleet crews worked on scheduled and non- scheduled maintenance, new vehicle set ups, ordering and parts ordering for the new vehicles and performed snow equipment inspections. • The Radio Shop performed regular radio maintenance, new vehicle set ups and prepped equipment to go to SPS (PD Upfitter) ### 5.B Packet Pg. 12 Communication: Chief Administrative Officer's Report (Reports from Council and Staff) DATE: October 19, 2021 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Second Public Hearing on the 2022 Mid-Biennium Budget Adjustment SUMMARY: This is the second public hearing on the 2022 Mid-Biennium Budget Adjustment at the regular City Council meeting. Public input is welcome as the City prepares the 2022 Mid-Biennium Budget Adjustment. 6.A Packet Pg. 13 DATE: October 19, 2021 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Second Public Hearing on the Capital Improvement Program SUMMARY: This date has been set for the second public hearing on the 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program. The Capital Improvement Program is incorporated into the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan. Public input is welcome. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance CompPlanAmend-CapitalImproveProgram (PDF) 2. 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (PDF) 6.B Packet Pg. 14 1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Capital Facilities Element for 2022-2027 Capital Improvements ORDINANCE NO.________ AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the Kent Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities Element to reflect a six-year plan for capital improvement projects (2022-2027) (CPA-2021-3). RECITALS A. The State of Washington Growth Management Act (GMA) requires internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements and the plans from other jurisdictions. B. To assure that comprehensive plans remain relevant and up to date, the GMA allows amendments to the capital facilities element of comprehensive plans concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a city budget. C. The City of Kent has established procedures for amending the Comprehensive Plan in Chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code (KCC), allowing amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the City’s budget. As part of these procedures the City Council may hold the public hearing instead of 6.B.a Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: Ordinance CompPlanAmend-CapitalImproveProgram (2884 : Second Public Hearing on the Capital Improvement Program) 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Capital Facilities Element for 2022-2027 Capital Improvements the Land Use and Planning Board as laid out in KCC 12.02.010. D. The City of Kent Finance Department has submitted proposed amendments to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to identify a six-year plan for capital improvement projects, including costs and revenue sources. E. On September 16, 2021, the City provided the State of Washington the required 60 day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 of the City’s proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The 60 day notice period has passed. F. On October 13, 2021, the City’s SEPA responsible official issued a SEPA Addendum to existing environmental documents consisting of the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan Review and Midway Subarea Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Draft and Final (ENV-2010-3) and the Downtown Subarea Action Plan Supplemental EIS Draft and Final (ENV-2012-30). The SEPA Addendum explained that the proposed amendment would not create unavoidable impacts beyond those previously identified in the EIS. G. After providing appropriate public notice, the City Council of the City of Kent conducted a public hearing on October 19, 2021 to consider the six-year plan for capital improvements and the requested amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities Element. H. On November 16, 2021, the City Council for the City of Kent approved the Capital Facilities Element amendment to the Kent 6.B.a Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: Ordinance CompPlanAmend-CapitalImproveProgram (2884 : Second Public Hearing on the Capital Improvement Program) 3 Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Capital Facilities Element for 2022-2027 Capital Improvements Comprehensive Plan (CPA-2021-3) to reflect a six-year plan for capital improvement projects (2022-2027). NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE SECTION 1. - Amendment. The City of Kent Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities Element are hereby amended to reflect a six-year plan for capital improvement projects (2022-2027), as set forth in Exhibit “A” attached and incorporated by this reference (CPA-2021-3). SECTION 2. – Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering; or references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations. SECTION 3. – Severability. If any one or more section, subsection, or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. – Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law. DANA RALPH, MAYOR Date Approved 6.B.a Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: Ordinance CompPlanAmend-CapitalImproveProgram (2884 : Second Public Hearing on the Capital Improvement Program) 4 Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Capital Facilities Element for 2022-2027 Capital Improvements ATTEST: KIMBERLEY A. KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted Date Published APPROVED AS TO FORM: PAT FITZPATRICK, CITY ATTORNEY S:\Permit\Plan\COMP_PLAN_AMENDMENTS\2021\City CIP\Compplanamend-Capitalimproveplan.Docx 6.B.a Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: Ordinance CompPlanAmend-CapitalImproveProgram (2884 : Second Public Hearing on the Capital Improvement Program) 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program September 1, 2021 EXHIBIT A 6.B.b Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (2884 : Second Public Hearing on the Capital Improvement Program) 6.B.b Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (2884 : Second Public Hearing on the Capital Improvement Program) City Resources 44% Utility Resources 51% Other Resources 5% Sources of Funds General Government 11% Parks, Rec & Comm Services 15% Transportation 23% Utilities 51% Projects by Category 6.B.b Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (2884 : Second Public Hearing on the Capital Improvement Program) 6.B.b Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (2884 : Second Public Hearing on the Capital Improvement Program) 6.B.b Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (2884 : Second Public Hearing on the Capital Improvement Program) 6.B.b Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (2884 : Second Public Hearing on the Capital Improvement Program) 6.B.b Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (2884 : Second Public Hearing on the Capital Improvement Program) 6.B.b Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (2884 : Second Public Hearing on the Capital Improvement Program) 6.B.b Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (2884 : Second Public Hearing on the Capital Improvement Program) 6.B.b Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (2884 : Second Public Hearing on the Capital Improvement Program) 6.B.b Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (2884 : Second Public Hearing on the Capital Improvement Program) 6.B.b Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (2884 : Second Public Hearing on the Capital Improvement Program) 6.B.b Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (2884 : Second Public Hearing on the Capital Improvement Program) DATE: October 19, 2021 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Public Hearing on the 2021 Tax Levy for the 2022 Budget SUMMARY: This is the public hearing on the 2021 tax levy for the 2022 budget. Public input is welcome. 6.C Packet Pg. 32 DATE: October 19, 2021 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Public Hearing on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Incorporate School District Capital Facilities Plans into the Capital Facilities Element SUMMARY: This is the public hearing on the yearly incorporation of the Kent, Auburn, and Federal Way School Districts’ Capital Facilities Plans into the Kent Comprehensive Plan Capital Facilities Element. Public input is welcome. Impact fee information is included as informational only and is not part of the public hearing. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance Amending Comprehensive Plan - Capital Facilities Element for Auburn-Kent-federal Way School Districts (PDF) 2. Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (PDF) 6.D Packet Pg. 33 1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2021-2022 – 2026-2027 School Dist. Capital Facilities Plans ORDINANCE NO.________ AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the Kent Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities Element to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts (CPA-2021-4). RECITALS A. The State of Washington Growth Management Act (GMA) requires internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements and the plans from other jurisdictions. B. To assure that comprehensive plans remain relevant and up to date, the GMA allows amendments to the capital facilities element of comprehensive plans concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a city budget. RCW 36.70A.130(2)(a)(iv). C. The City of Kent has established procedures for amending the Comprehensive Plan in Chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code (KCC), allowing amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the City budget and allowing the City Council to hold the public hearing instead of the Land Use and Planning Board, as laid out in KCC 12.02.010. 6.D.a Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: Ordinance Amending Comprehensive Plan - Capital Facilities Element for Auburn-Kent-federal Way School Districts (2885 : 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2021-2022 – 2026-2027 School Dist. Capital Facilities Plans D. The Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts have submitted proposed amendments to their Capital Facilities Plans to be included in an amendment of the City’s Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. E. After providing appropriate public notice, the City Council of the City of Kent considered the requested Comprehensive Plan amendment and held a public hearing on the same on October 19, 2021. F. On September 13, 2021, the City provided the required 60 day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 to the State of Washington of the City’s proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The 60 day notice period has passed, and by operation of law, it is deemed approved. G. On November 16, 2021, the City Council of the City of Kent approved the Capital Facilities Element amendment CPA-2020-1 to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit “A” attached and incorporated by this reference. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE SECTION 1. - Amendment. The Kent Comprehensive Plan, and its Capital Facilities Element, are amended to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit “A” attached and incorporated by this reference (CPA-2021-4). 6.D.a Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: Ordinance Amending Comprehensive Plan - Capital Facilities Element for Auburn-Kent-federal Way School Districts (2885 : 3 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2021-2022 – 2026-2027 School Dist. Capital Facilities Plans SECTION 2. – Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering; or references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations. SECTION 3. – Severability. If any one or more section, subsection, or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, that decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. – Effective Date. This ordinance will take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law. DANA RALPH, MAYOR Date Approved ATTEST: KIMBERLEY A. KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted Date Published APPROVED AS TO FORM: PAT FITZPATRICK, CITY ATTORNEY 6.D.a Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: Ordinance Amending Comprehensive Plan - Capital Facilities Element for Auburn-Kent-federal Way School Districts (2885 : Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 2020-2021 through 2026-2027 June 2021 Kent School District No. 415 12033 SE 256th Street Kent, Washington 98030-6643 (253) 373-7295 BOARD of DIRECTORS Ms. Denise Daniels, President Ms. Michele Bettinger, Vice President Ms. Maya Vengadasalam, Legislative Representative Ms. Leslie Hamada, Director Mr. Joe Bento, Director ADMINISTRATION Dr. Calvin J. Watts Superintendent of Schools Israel Vela, Chief School Operations and Academic Support Officer Dr. Jewelle Harmon, Chief Accountability Officer Mr. Benjamin Rarick, Executive Director of Fiscal Services Mr. Dave Bussard, Director of Capital Planning & Facilities EXHIBIT A 6.D.b Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table of Contents I - Executive Summary ................................................................................................. 3 II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection ............................................................................. 4 III - Current Kent School District “Standard of Service" ................................................. 6 Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students ................................................... 7 Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students ........................................ 7 IV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools ............................................................ 8 V - Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan ................................................................ 9 VI - Portable Classrooms ........................................................................................... 10 VII - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity ............................................................... 11 VIII - Finance Plan ..................................................................................................... 12 IX - Summary of Changes to June 2020 Capital Facilities Plan ..................................... 14 X - Appendices .......................................................................................................... 15 12 2 22 6.D.b Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan I - Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan has been prepared by the Kent School District as the organization's capital facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual Plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2021 for the 2021-2022 school year. This annual update of the Plan reflects no new major capital projects, and an inflation-based adjustment to prior year impact fee rates. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long-Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and Renton and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. This Plan has also been submitted to cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac for their information and inclusion in their Comprehensive Plans. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee- implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Program capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Portables in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District’s standard of service and the existing inventory of permanent facilities. The District's program capacity 23 3 33 6.D.b Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the state’s mandated reduction of class size to meet the standard of service for Kent School District. Portables provide additional transitional capacity. Kent School District is the fifth largest (FTE basis) district in the state. Enrollment is electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (“OSPI”) on Form P-223. Although funding apportionment is based on Annual Average Full Time Equivalent (AAFTE), enrollment on October 1 is a widely recognized “snapshot in time” that is used to report the District’s enrollment for the year as reported to OSPI. The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of transitional facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of portables. This Plan currently represents projects in process funded primarily by the Kent School District’s 2016 Bond, as well as the 2018 Capital Construction Levy. Additional information about these projects can be found on the district’s capital projects homepage (link). Additionally, project updates sent to our community of stakeholders can be accessed on the KSD website (link). Based on revised student generation rates, and district enrollment projects, the district has updated the proposed student impact fee rate for the coming year. For a short overview, see Section IX (Summary of Changes to the June 2020 Capital Facilities Plan). 34 4 44 6.D.b Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, enrollment growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years (See Table 2). For this Plan, the district relied substantially on the results from Dr. Les Kendrick’s study of long-range enrollment forecasts for the Kent School District in the Fall of 2020. King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system (See Table 1). 6.88% of 26,011 King County live births in 2016 is projected for 1,789 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2021. This is an increase of 524 live births in King County over the previous year (See Table 2). Early Childhood Education students (also identified as “ECE”), “Early Childhood Special Education (“ECSE”) students are forecast and reported to OSPI separately on Form P-223H for Special Education Enrollment. Capacity is reserved to serve students in the ECE programs at elementary schools. In addition to live birth data, enrollment projections for October 1, 2021 going forward rely upon the results of the enrollment study by Dr. Kendrick, utilizing the “medium growth” methodology. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions will be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. The Kent School District serves eight permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, and Auburn and smaller portions of the cities of SeaTac, Black Diamond, and Maple Valley. 45 5 55 6.D.b Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last ten years. Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary .277 Middle School .071 Senior High .086 Total .435 Multi-Family Elementary .258 Middle School .058 Senior High .100 Total .416 The student generation factor is based on a survey of 1,399 single-family dwelling units and 1,020 multi- family dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy rates. In preparing the 2021-2022 to 2026-2027 Capital Facilities Plan the District contracted with Dr. Les Kendrick of Educational Data Solutions LLC, a noted expert in demographic studies for school districts, to analyze and prepare the student generation factor. EDC included both “garden” and “urban style” apartments in the calculation for multi-family residences. Within the district’s borders there are several low-income and multi-family housing projects coming on-line in 2021. Once developed with occupancy occurring the District does recognize that the student generation for multi-family housing may impact future Capital Facilities Plan updates. 56 6 66 6.D.b Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 OCTOBER REPORT 1251H (HEADCOUNT) ENROLLMENT HISTORY LB = Live Births LB in 2007 LB in 2008 LB in 2009 LB in 2010 LB in 2011 LB in 2012 LB in 2013 LB in 2014 LB in 2015 October HC Enrollment 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 King County Live Births 1 24,899 25,222 25,057 24,514 24,630 25,032 24,910 25,348 25,487 Increase / Decrease 655 323 -165 -543 116 402 280 316 139 Kindergarten / Birth % 1 8.57%8.40%8.34%8.34%8.17%8.14%7.98%7.93%6.68% Kindergarten 2,134 2,119 2,090 2,045 2,013 2,037 1,989 2,010 1,703 Grade 1 2,017 2,186 2,127 2,131 2,067 2,056 2,061 2,036 1,882 Grade 2 1,905 2,055 2,190 2,163 2,163 2,077 2,008 2,091 1,980 Grade 3 2,082 1,922 2,070 2,176 2,195 2,143 2,043 1,995 2,001 Grade 4 2,000 2,087 1,956 2,089 2,195 2,218 2,118 2,038 1,912 Grade 5 2,044 2,008 2,116 1,958 2,103 2,189 2,169 2,120 1,937 Grade 6 2,026 2,079 2,023 2,058 1,952 2,120 2,184 2,164 2,024 Grade 7 Middle School 2,139 2,046 2,104 1,974 2,021 1,922 2,044 2,166 2,010 Grade 8 " "2,139 2,121 2,091 2,100 2,021 2,043 1,882 2,073 2,086 Grade 9 Senior High 2,455 2,483 2,428 2,093 2,105 2,006 2,004 1,888 2,006 Grade 10 " "2,092 2,046 2,151 2,165 2,099 2,080 1,946 2,035 1,813 Grade 11 " "1,933 1,873 1,802 1,818 1,865 1,823 1,732 1,663 1,744 Grade 12 " "1,646 1,539 1,576 1,742 1,730 1,810 1,654 1,634 1,484 Total Enrollment 2 26,612 26,564 26,724 26,512 26,529 26,524 25,834 25,913 24,582 Yearly Headcount Increase / Decrease -3 -48 160 -212 17 -5 -690 79 -1,331 Cumulative Increase -219 -267 -107 -319 -302 -307 -997 -918 -2,249 1 This number indicates actual births in King County 5 years prior to enrollment year as updated by Washington State Department of Health, Center for Health Statistics. Kent School District percentage based on actual Kindergarten enrollment 5 years later. 2 Enrollment reported to OSPI on Form P-223 generates basic education funding and excludes Early Childhood Special Education ("ECSE" & "B2" or Birth to 2 Preschool Inclusive Education) and excludes College-only Running Start students. Change to Full Day Kindergarten for all schools For 2021 CFP - Headcount Enrollment History Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 1 May 2021 67 7 77 6.D.b Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX - YEAR ENROLLMENT PROJECTION Full Day Kindergarten at all Elem LB in 2015 LB in 2016 LB in 2017 LB in 2018 LB in 2019 LB in 2020 Est LB in 2021 ACTUAL ENROLLMENT October 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 King County Live Births 25,487 26,011 25,274 24,337 24,090 23,849 23,611 Increase / Decrease 139 524 -737 -937 -1,184 -1,425 -726 Kindergarten / Birth % 6.68%6.88%6.88%6.94%6.80%6.65%6.51% FD Kindergarten 1,703 1,789 1,739 1,688 1,637 1,587 1,536 Grade 1 1,882 1,787 1,945 1,950 1,951 1,944 1,937 Grade 2 1,980 1,968 1,845 2,000 2,002 1,998 1,992 Grade 3 2,001 2,052 2,014 1,880 2,035 2,033 2,027 Grade 4 1,912 2,083 2,110 2,062 1,922 2,076 2,074 Grade 5 1,937 1,979 2,130 2,148 2,097 1,949 2,105 Grade 6 2,024 2,013 2,032 2,177 2,193 2,135 1,985 Grade 7 Middle School 2,010 2,060 2,024 2,033 2,176 2,188 2,130 Grade 8 " "2,086 2,105 2,130 2,085 2,091 2,233 2,245 Grade 9 Senior High 2,006 2,163 2,157 2,173 2,125 2,126 2,270 Grade 10 " "1,813 2,078 2,213 2,197 2,210 2,157 2,157 Grade 11 " "1,744 1,625 1,841 1,951 1,934 1,942 1,894 Grade 12 " "1,484 1,707 1,571 1,772 1,877 1,855 1,863 Total Enrollment Projection 24,582 25,410 25,751 26,117 26,250 26,224 26,215 Yearly Increase/Decrease -1,331 828 341 366 133 -26 -9 Yearly Increase/Decrease %-5.14%3.37%1.34%1.42%0.51%-0.10%-0.03% Total Enrollment Projection 24,582 25,410 25,751 26,117 26,250 26,224 26,215 Live births for King County are estimates for year 2021 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2021 ("Medium Growth Model") 2020 - 2026 Enrollment Projections PROJECTED ENROLLMENT Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 May 2021 78 8 88 6.D.b Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan III- Current Kent School District “Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County Code 21A.06 references a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the district which would best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as “impact” schools and the standard of service targets a lower-class size at those facilities. Portables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. The standard of service defined herein will continue to evolve in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service. This process will affect various aspects of the District's standard of service and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. 89 9 99 6.D.b Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students • Class size ratio for grades K - 3 is planned for an average of 23 students per class, not to exceed 26. • Class size ratio for grades 4 - 6 is planned for an average of 27 students per class, not to exceed 29. Some special programs require specialized classroom space and the program capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in special programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs. Students may also be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Some identified students will also be provided educational opportunities in classrooms for special programs such as those designated as follows: English Learners (EL) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) – Federal Program Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) – State Program Highly Capable Students – State Program Reading, math or science Labs Dual Language Programs in four elementary schools Inclusive Education Service for Elementary and Secondary students with disabilities may be provided in a separate or self-contained classroom sometimes with a capacity of 10- 15 depending on the program. Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings per the negotiated collective bargaining agreement with KEA. • The average class size ratio for grades 7–8 is 30 students per class and 143 students per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 150 based on five class periods per day. 910 10 1010 6.D.b Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan • The average class size ratio for grades 9-12 is 32 students per class and 153 students per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 160 based on five class periods per day. Like Inclusive Education Programs listed above, many other secondary programs require specialized classroom space which can reduce the program capacity of the permanent school buildings, such as technology labs, performing arts activities, a variety of career and technical education programs, and other specialized programs. Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a workspace during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the Kent School District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 95% for secondary schools. Program capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level. 1011 11 1111 6.D.b Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan IV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 28,564 students and transitional (portable) capacity to house 2,085. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section III. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity (See Table 3). The ratio between permanent capacity and portable capacity is 94.9%-5.1%. The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs, additional classrooms and new schools. Program capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes implemented in the Fall of 2020. Calculation of Elementary, Middle School and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B, and C. Maps of existing schools are included. For clarification, the following is a brief description of some of the non-traditional programs for students in Kent School District: The 2021-2022 school year will have two academy programs within the district housed at our new Kent Laboratory Academy. The project was approved by the Kent Board of Directors in 2019 by utilizing funding from the 2016 Bond Project “20 Classrooms”. The new facility has 24 classrooms and will now be utilized for many types of Academy related programs. The previous facility of these two programs (Kent Phoenix Academy Campus) will have the voter approved 2018 Levy Projects completed and will be available for additional capacity for our District at the secondary level. iGrad - Kent School District has developed the Individualized Graduation and Degree Program or “iGrad”. iGrad offers a second chance to students aged 16-21 who have dropped out of high school and want to earn a high school diploma. iGrad is not included in this Capital Facilities Plan because it is served in leased space at the Kent Hill Plaza Shopping Center. Over the past three years, enrollment in the iGrad program has averaged over 300 students. 1112 12 1212 6.D.b Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS 2021 - 2022 SCHOOL Year Opened ABR ADDRESS Program Capacity Carriage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235 - 140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 428 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042 360 Covington Elementary 2018 CO 25811 156th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 630 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225 - 180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 408 East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 464 Emerald Park 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 477 Fairwood Elementary 1969 FW 16600 - 148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 386 George T. Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 432 Glenridge Elementary 1996 GR 19405 - 120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 431 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700 - 191st Place SE, Kent 98042 428 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641 - 144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 477 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915 - 186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 384 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700 - 64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 454 Kent Valley Early Learning Center 2014 KV 317 ---4th Ave S, Kent, WA 98032 318 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660 - 142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 497 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 455 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710 - 108th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 454 Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621 - 140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 497 Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98030 478 Neely-O'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 454 Panther Lake Elementary 2009 PL 12022 SE 216th Street, Kent, 98031 552 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 463 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825 - 118th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 487 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030 - 162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 477 River Ridge Elementary 2021 RR 00000 - 22420 Military Rd S SeaTac, WA 758 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135 - 228th Ave SE, Black Diamond 98010 477 Scenic Hill Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030 454 Soos Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 360 Springbrook Elementary 1969 SB 20035 - 100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 396 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300 - 132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 477 Elementary TOTAL 13,813 Cedar Heights Middle School 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 Street, Covington 98042 895 Mattson Middle School 1981 MA 16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042 787 Meeker Middle School 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 832 Meridian Middle School 1958 MM 23480 - 120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 792 Mill Creek Middle School 2005 MC 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 916 Northwood Middle School 1996 NW 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 926 Middle School TOTAL 5,148 Kent-Meridian High School 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98030 1,904 Kentlake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042 1,957 Kentridge Senior High School 1968 KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 2,277 Kentwood Senior High School 1981 KW 25800 - 164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 2,159 Senior High TOTAL 8,297 Kent Laboratory Academy 2021 KLA 00000 - 208th St Kent, WA 98030 456 Kent Phoenix Academy 2007 PH 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98030 850 DISTRICT TOTAL 28,564 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 May 20211213 13 1313 6.D.b Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Amendment 1314 14 1414 6.D.b Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Kent School District Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P,NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri(Thailand), MapmyIndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors,and the GIS User Community May 22, 2017 0 3.5 71.75 mi 0 5.5 112.75 km 1:144,448 Davis Demographics & PlanningMap by: SchoolSite Locator1415 15 1515 6.D.b Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Kent School District Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P,NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri(Thailand), MapmyIndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors,and the GIS User Community May 22, 2017 0 3.5 71.75 mi 0 5.5 112.75 km 1:144,448 Davis Demographics & PlanningMap by: SchoolSite Locator1516 16 1616 6.D.b Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan V - Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan In November 2016, the voters of the Kent School District approved a bond measure for $252 million. This new bonding authority provided for the replacement for Covington Elementary school, which opened in August of 2018, a new elementary school in the Kent Valley (Currently being built at the former location of Kent Mountain View Academy – River Ridge Elementary), and the twenty additional classrooms project redirected by the Kent School Board to build a 20 classroom Kent Academy Facility housing multiple academy programs in our district, which is currently underway at the site of the Old Panther Lake Elementary School (The Laboratory Academy). At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring 2021, the following projects to increase capacity will be a part of our student capacity in the Kent School District. • `Construction is more than 80% completed for the New Valley Elementary School (River Ridge) on West Hill within the City Limits of SeaTac, WA. The 89,000 square foot K-6 school project is being funded with bond funds and impact fees from King County. It will open for the 2021-2022 school year. • Construction is more than 95% complete for our new Kent Laboratory Academy at the Old Panther Lake Elementary Site in Kent in order to free up space at the current Kent Phoenix Academy location (formerly Sequoia Junior High) for additional classroom space if needed and/or to open another middle school soon. The new 59,000 square foot facility will accommodate a variety of Academy Programs within the Kent School District. • Some funding for lease or purchase of additional portables may be provided by impact fees as needed. Sites are based on need for additional capacity. As a critical component of capital facilities planning, county and city planners and decision- makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety to and from school and bus stops as well as bus pull-outs and turn- arounds. Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future (See Table 4 & Sitemap). 1617 17 1717 6.D.b Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Voter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is secured for purchase of additional sites, but some may be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements, and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. The Board of Directors has started the process to sell surplus property over the last school year. The Board will continue an annual review of standards of service and those decisions will be reflected in each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. 1718 18 1818 6.D.b Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity Projected Projected % for SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE LOCATION Type Status Completion Program new Date Capacity Growth Approximate Approximate # on Map ELEMENTARY 6 New Valley Elementary School (River Ridge) Old Kent Mountain View Academy Site Elementary Addition Under Construction 2021-2022 758 100% MIDDLE SCHOOL & SENIOR HIGH 3 New Academy Site (Kent Laboratory Academy)Old Panther Lake Elementary Site Academy Under Construction 2021-2022 456 100% TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional Capacity Portables 1 TBD - For placement as needed New Planning 2020+24 - 31 each 100% # on Map 2 OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Land Use Designation Type 1 164th SE (Across from Mattson)25230-25050 164th SE, Covington 98042 Rural TBD 2 Ham Lake area (Pollard)16820 SE 240, Kent 98042 Rural Elementary 4 Shady Lk area (Sowers, Blaine, Drahota, Paroline)17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98058 Urban Elementary 5 SE of Lake Morton area (West property)SE 332 & 204 SE, Kent 98042 Rural Secondary 10 South Central Site (Yeh)SE 286th St & 124th Ave SE, Auburn 98092 Urban TBD 12 256th - Covington (Halleson)25435 SE 256th, Covington 98042 Rural To be sold 12a 156th - Covington (Wikstrom)25847 156th Ave. SE, Covington 98042 Rural To be sold Notes: 1 TBD - To be determined - Some sites are identified but placement, timing and/or configuration of portables has not been determined. 2 Numbers correspond to sites on Site Bank Map on Page 19. Other Map site locations are parcels identified in Table 7 on Page 29. King County King County Land Use Jurisdiction King County King County King County King County King County Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 May 2021 1819 19 1919 6.D.b Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Incorporate copyright KROLL MAP COMPANY, INC. This map has been modified by KSD 08/01 Fairwood Elementary Ridgewood Elementary Northwood Middle School Lake Youngs Elementary Glenridge Elementary Kentridge High School Kent Laboratory Academy Springbrook Elementary Soos Creek Elementary Sunrise Elementary Meridian Middle School Park Orchard Elementary Martin Sortun Elementary Daniel Elementary East Hill Elementary Kent Elementary Kent-Meridian High School Scenic Hill Elementary Kent School District Administration Center Meadow Ridge Elementary Pine Tree Elementary Horizon Elementary Covington Elementary Cedar Heights Middle School Cedar Valley Elementary Jenkins Creek Elementary Kentwood High School Crestwood Elementary Mattson Middle School Sawyer Woods Elementary Kentlake High School River Ridge Elementary Neely O’Brien Elementary Carriage Crest Elementary Meridian Elementary Meeker Middle School Grass Lake Elementary Emerald Park Elementary Kent Phoenix Academy Millennium Elementary Mill Creek Middle School 1920 20 2020 6.D.b Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft I - Portable Classrooms The Plan references use of portables as interim or transitional capacity and facilities. Currently, the District utilizes portables to house students in excess of permanent capacity and for program purposes at some school locations (Please see Appendices A, B, C). Based on enrollment projections, implementation of full day kindergarten programs, lower state mandated class sizes, program capacity, and the need for additional permanent capacity, the District anticipates the need to purchase or lease additional portables during the next six- year period to ensure capacity (Noted in section V. Six Yr. Planning Construction). During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District’s portables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the portables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these portables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the times of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Portables currently in the District’s inventory are continually evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced. The Plan projects that the District will use portables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of portables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between portables, emerging technologies, and educational restructuring will continue to be examined. 2021 21 2121 6.D.b Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan VII - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section IV, the program capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size requirements, class size fluctuations etc. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3, the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts (See Tables 5 & 5 a-b-c). Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment “snapshot in time” to report enrollment for the year. Kent School District continues to be the fifth largest district (both FTE and headcount basis) in the state of Washington. The P-223 Headcount for October 2020 was 24,587 with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECSE and college-only Running Start students. In October 2020, there were an additional 1,102 students in 11th and 12th grade participating in the Running Start program at different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. Of these students, 686 attended classes only at the college (“college- only”) and are excluded from FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District has one of the highest Running Start program participation rates in the state. Based on the enrollment forecasts, permanent facility inventory and capacity, current standard of service, portable capacity, and future additional classroom space, the District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of portables (See Table 5 and Tables 5 a-b-c). This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There may be a need for additional portables and/or new schools to accommodate growth and additional programs within the District. New schools may be designed to accommodate placement of future portables. School attendance area changes, limited and costly movement of portables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and underutilization as well as possible overcrowding of facilities in different parts of the District. 2122 22 2222 6.D.b Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT SCHOOL YEAR 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Actual Permanent Program Capacity 1 27,255 28,564 28,564 28,564 28,564 28,564 28564 Changes to Permanent Capacity 1 Capacity Increase (F) Additional Permanent Classrooms 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 27,255 28,564 28,564 28,564 28,564 28,564 28,564 Interim Portable Capacity Elementary Portable Capacity Required 1,248 0 0 0 0 0 0 Middle School Portable Capacity Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Senior High School Portable Capacity Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Interim Portable Capacity Total 1,248 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 28,503 28,564 28,564 28,564 28,564 28,564 28,564 TOTAL ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 2 24,582 24,410 25,751 26,117 26,250 26,224 26,215 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 3,921 4,154 2,813 2,447 2,314 2,340 2,349 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2021 ("Medium Growth Model") P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 May 2021 2223 23 2323 6.D.b Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY - Grades K - 6 SCHOOL YEAR 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Actual Elementary Permanent Capacity 1 13,000 13,000 13,758 13,758 13,758 13,758 13,758 New Elementary School - Kent Valley 758 Additional Permanent Classrooms 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal 13,000 13,758 13,758 13,758 13,758 13,758 13,758 Portable Capacity Required 1 1248 456 336 336 336 336 336 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 / 2 14,248 14,214 14,094 14,094 14,094 14,094 14,094 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 3 13,439 13,671 13,815 13,905 13,837 13,723 13,657 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 809 543 279 189 257 371 437 Number of Portables Required 52 19 14 14 14 14 14 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Additional classrooms will be placed at schools with the greatest need for aleve overcrowding 3 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2021 ("Medium Growth Model") Enrollment & Projections reflect FULL Day Kindergarten at ALL Elementary schools @ 1.0 & exclude ECSE Preschoolers. P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A May 2021 2324 24 2424 6.D.b Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Amendment to KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY MIDDLE SCHOOL - Grades 7 - 8 SCHOOL YEAR 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-2027 Actual Middle School Permanent Capacity 1 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 Changes to Middle School Capacity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 Portable Capacity Required 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 & 3 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 2 4,096 4,164 4,154 4,118 4,267 4,421 4,374 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1,052 984 994 1,030 881 727 774 Number of Portables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Classroom Portables required at middle schools at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2021 ("Medium Growth Model") 3 Surplus capacity due to grade level reconfiguration - All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004. P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B May 2021 2425 25 2525 6.D.b Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH - Grades 9 - 12 SCHOOL YEAR 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-2025 2025-26 2026-27 Actual Senior High Permanent Capacity 1 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 Changes to High School Capacity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 Portables Capacity Required 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 3 7,047 7,574 7,782 8,094 8,146 8,080 8,184 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1,250 723 515 203 151 217 113 Number of Portables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Classroom Portables required at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 3 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2021 ("Medium Growth Model") P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C May 2021 2526 26 2626 6.D.b Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan VIII - Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2021-2022 through 2026-2027. The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on future bond issues, state school construction assistance, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. With River Ridge Elementary School (New Valley School Project) and Kent Laboratory Academy (New Academy Project) coming on-line for school year 2021-2022, this will help support the capacity issue that has been an issue for our district. The building rate within the City of Kent and surrounding areas within our boundary continue to be robust. The district is likely to see growth in enrollment due to these conditions. In November 2016, the District held a special election to approve the authorization of $252,000,000 in bonding authority. The projects described above are part of this authorization. The first series of bonds ($80 million) were issued in February 2017, which funded the Covington Elementary Replacement School, as well as other infrastructure projects. Impact fees will be used at both the New Valley and Academy projects due to escalation in construction pricing across the Pacific Northwest. According to RCW 82.02.090, the definition of an impact fee is ". . . a payment of money imposed upon development as a condition of development approval to pay for public facilities needed to serve new growth and development, and that is reasonably related to the new development that creates additional demand and need for public facilities, that is a proportionate share of the cost of the public facilities, and that is used for facilities that reasonably benefit the new development. `Impact fee' does not include a reasonable permit or application fee." Mitigation or impact fees can be calculated on the basis of "unhoused student need" or "the maintenance of a district's level of service" as related to new residential development. A mitigation/impact fee may be imposed based upon a determination of insufficient existing permanent and/or portable school space or to pay for permanent and/or portable school space previously constructed as a result of growth in the district. A district's School Board must first approve the application of the mitigation or impact fees and, in turn, approval must then be granted by the other general government jurisdictions having responsibility within the district, counties, cities and towns. (Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac) Though the current enrollment projections increase for both elementary and secondary schools are relatively flat, the ongoing need to provide permanent instructional facilities to house students is a driving need as the shifts in our family populations continue, due to ongoing development. Impact fees will be used to support and address the challenges related to the number of temporary instructional facilities currently in use, the replacement of some of these aged facilities, the maintenance of the district's level of services, and the potential expansions to existing facilities in future years. 2627 27 2727 6.D.b Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan The Kent School District 2021 CFP update includes continued execution of the 2016 Capital Bond Projects and anticipation of the data collection and review of our Facility Assessment Reports within the coming months. With the opening of our River Ridge Elementary School and the Kent Laboratory Academy, we are advancing opportunity to add capacity for our programs and student-based needs. The District Facilities and Capital Planning Teams have been preparing to complete an initial plan (Fall 2021) as we move the next steps of creating a Capital Bond Planning Task Force (CBPTF) – which will include District personnel, design professionals, teaching staff, student voice as well as community members to being well collaborated discussions to this platform. Our initial plan has revealed priorities including school replacement due to age, and the need for added permanent facilities to (1) reduce and eliminate our need for portables and (2) accommodate future growth as housing in the Kent region continues to expand. Once the CBPTF has it will be brought before the District’s Board of Directors for comments, discussion, and approval. A Capital Bond Measure would follow soon after approval. Portable purchases may be required before the Bond Measure passes as it takes approximately three years from design to open for most large-scale projects such as schools or added permanent capacity. Future updates to this Capital Facilities Plan will include detail of any adopted planning. For the Six-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Capital Planning Team. Please see pages 13-14 for a summary of the cost basis. Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last elementary school, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost of the future elementary schools and additional classrooms. Project Projected Cost New Elementary School Kent Valley (To open Fall 2021) - Board Approved Name – River Ridge Elementary $55,000,000 New Academy Facility (To open Fall 2021) - Board Approved Name – Kent Laboratory Academy $36,000,000 Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. District Adjustment The impact fee calculations on Appendix B & C include a “District Adjustment” which is equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas total for this year and adjusted for the decrease in the 2022 CY Consumer Price Index (2.2%) for the Seattle metropolitan area (Previously 2.5% for the 2021 CY). 2728 28 2828 6.D.b Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN Secured Unsecured Impact SCHOOL FACILITIES *2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 TOTAL Local & State State 2 or Local 3 Fees 5 Estimated Estimated PERMANENT FACILITIES No School Projects at this time.$0 TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional portables 3 - 4 $0 OTHER N / A Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 * F = Funded U = Unfunded NOTES: 2 The District anticipates receiving some State Funding Construction Assistance for some projects. 3 Facility needs are pending review. Some of these projects may be funded with impact fees. 4 Cost of portables based on current cost and adjusted for inflation for future years. 5 Fees in this column are based on amount of fees collected to date and estimated fees on future units. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 6 May 2021 2829 29 2929 6.D.b Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions & Costs Average of Sites Purchased, Sold or Built on within last 10 Years Type & # on Map School / Site Year Open / Purchased Sold Location Acreage Cost/Price Avg cost-price/acre Total Average Cost / Acre Elementary 12 / Urban Property Sale-29.7 acres of Plemons-Yeh site 2016 SSE 124th Ave and 284th ST SE 29.70 $947,536 $31,904 7 / Rural Property Sale - Scarsella site 2015 2900 Kent Black Diamond RD SE 13.25 $330,000 $24,906 3 / Rural Property Sale - Old Covington Parcel A, #362206-9081 2019 17070 SE Wax Rd, Covington 8.00 $3,869,697 $483,712 3 / Rural Property Sale - Old Covington Parcel , #362206-9081 2021 17070 SE Wax Rd, Covington 8.00 0,000,000 $0 6 / Rural Property purchased for new elementary 2019 5 lots purchased Military Road South SeaTac WA 10.00 $1,770,355 $177,036 Elementary Site Subtotal 68.95 $6,917,588 $100,328 Elem site average Middle School No Acquisitions for Middle School 0.00 $0 Middle School Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 Middle Schl Site Avg. Senior High No Acquisitions for Senior Highs 0.00 $0 $0 Senior High Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 Sr Hi Site Average Note: All rural sites were purchased prior to adoption of Urban Growth Area. Numbers correspond to locations on Site Bank & Acquisitions Map on Page 17. Properties purchased prior to 2010 1 / Urban Site - Covington area North (So of Mattson MS)1984 2 / Rural Site - Ham Lake east (Pollard)1992 4 / Urban Site - Shady Lake (Sowers-Blaine-Drahota-Paroline)1995 68.95 $6,917,588 5 / Rural Site - SE of Lake Morton area (West property)1993 10 / Urban Site - Yeh-Williams (W of 132 Ave SE at SE 288)1999 12 / Urban Site - SE 256th Covington (Halleson)2000 12a / Urban Site - 156th Ave. SE Covington (Wikstrom)2004 Total Acreage & Cost Total Average Cost / Acre $100,328 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 7 May 2021 2930 30 3030 6.D.b Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Amendment to KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors - Single Family Student Generation Factors - Multi-Family Elementary (Grades K - 6)0.277 Elementary 0.258 Middle School (Grades 7 - 8)0.071 Middle School 0.058 Senior High (Grades 9 - 12)0.086 Senior High 0.100 Total 0.435 Total 0.416 Projected Increased Student Capacity OSPI - Square Footage per Student Elementary 758 Elementary 115 Middle School 0 Middle School 148 Senior High (Academy)456 Senior High 173 Special Education ?? Required Site Acreage per Facility Elementary (required)12 Average Site Cost / Acre Middle School (required)25 Elementary $100,328 Senior High (required)38 Middle School $0 Senior High $0 New Facility Construction Cost Elementary *$55,000,000 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost Middle School $0 Elementary @ 24 $0 Senior High * (Academy)$36,000,000 Middle School @ 29 $0 Senior High @ 31 $0 Temporary Facility Square Footage State Funding Assistance Credit Elementary 125,204 District Funding Assistance Percentage 53.79% Middle School 10,256 Senior High 21,296 Total 4.3%156,756 Construction Cost Allocation CCA - Cost/Sq, Ft. $238.22 Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary 1,621,688 Middle School 660,904 District Average Assessed Value Senior High/Other 1,223,349 Single Family Residence $268,271 Total 95.7%3,505,941 Total Facilities Square Footage District Average Assessed Value Elementary 1,746,892 Multi-Family Residence $226,726 Middle School 671,160 Senior High/Other 1,244,645 Total 3,662,697 Bond Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 1.41 Current Rate / 1,000 Tax Rate 0.0014 Developer Provided Sites / Facilities Value 0 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Dwelling Units 0 Current Bond Interest Rate 2.44% CPI Inflation Factor 2.20% Per OSPI Website Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX A)May 2021 3031 31 3131 6.D.b Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre Facility Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary)12 $100,328 758 0.27734 $440.50 A 2 (Middle School)25 $0 0 0.07076 $0.00 A 3 (Senior High)38 $0 456 0.08649 $0.00 Total 75 $100,328 1,214 0.435A $440.50 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary)$55,000,000 758 0.27734 0.903 $18,171.62 B 2 (Middle School)$0 0 0.07076 0.984 B 3 (Senior High)$36,000,000 456 0.08649 0.998 $6,814.50 Total $91,000,000 1,214 0.435 B $24,986.13 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence (Portables) Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary)$0 24 0.27734 0.097 $0.00 C 2 (Middle School)$0 29 0.07076 0.016 $0.00 C 3 (Senior High)$0 31 0.08649 0.02 $0.00 Total $0 84 0.435 C $0.00 State Funding Assistance Credit per Single Family Residence (formerly "State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor Construction Cost Allocation SPI Sq. Ft. / Student Assistance %Student Factor D 1 (Elementary)$238.22 115 0.5379 0.27734 $4,086.86 D 2 (Middle School)$238.22 148 0.5379 0.07076 $1,342 D 3 (Senior High)$238.22 173 0.5379 0.08649 $1,917D $7,346.10 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value (AAV)$268,271 Net Present Value (per EQ) (NPV)8.90 Current Debt Service Rate / 1,000 ( r )0.14%TC $3,366.53 (Below used to calculate NPV) Current Bond Interest Rate 2.44% Years Amortized (10 Years)- Used in NPV Calculation 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC 0 Fee Recap ** A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $440.50 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $24,986.13 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $0.00 Subtotal $25,426.63 D = State Match Credit per Residence $7,346.10 TC = Tax Credit per Residence $3,366.53 Subtotal $10,712.63 Total Unfunded Need $14,713.99 50% Developer Fee Obligation $7,357 FC = Facility Credit (if applicable)$0 District Adjustment (1538.90) Net Fee Obligation per Residence - Single Family $5,818.09 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX B)June 2020 3132 32 3232 6.D.b Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre Facility Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary)12 $100,328 758 0.25784 $409.53 A 2 (Middle School)25 $0 0 0.05784 A 3 (Senior High)38 $0 456 0.100 $0.00 Total $75 100,328 1,214 0.416A $409.53 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent / Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary)$55,000,000 758 0.25784 0.903 $16,893.96 B 2 (Middle School)$0 0 0.05784 0.984 B 3 (Senior High)$36,000,000 456 0.100 0.998 $7,878.95 Total $91,000,000 1,214 0.416 B $24,772.91 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary)$0 24 0.25784 0.097 $0.00 C 2 (Middle School)$0 29 0.05784 0.016 $0 C 3 (Senior High)$0 31 0.100 0.02 $0 Total $0 84 C $0.00 State Funding Assistance Credit per Multi-Family Residence (formerly "State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance SPI Sq. Ft. / Student Equalization %Student Factor D 1 (Elementary)$238.22 115 0.5379 0.25784 $3,799.51 D 2 (Middle School)$238.22 148 0.5379 0.05784 $1,097 D 3 (Senior High)$238.22 173 0.5379 0.1 $2,217D $7,113.22 Tax Credit per Multi Family Residence Average MF Residential Assessed Value (AAV)$226,726 Net Present Value (per EQ) (NPV)8.90 Current Debt Service Rate / 1,000 ( r )0.14%TC $2,845.18 (Below used to calculate NPV) Current Bond Interest Rate 2.44% Years Amortized (10 Years)- Used in NPV Calculation 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC 0 Fee Recap ** A = Site Acquisition per Multi-Family Unit $409.53 B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $24,772.91 C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $0.00 Subtotal $25,182.44 D = State Match Credit per MF Unit $7,113.22 TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit $2,845.18 Subtotal -$9,958.40 Total Unfunded Need $15,224.04 50% Developer Fee Obligation $7,612 FC = Facility Credit (if applicable)0 District Adjustment ($5,154) Net Fee Obligation per Residential Unit - Multi-family $2,457.53 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX C)June 2020 3233 33 3333 6.D.b Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan IX - Summary of Changes to June 2020 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the June 2020 Plan are summarized here. Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in class size ratio as well as program changes. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect use, lease or purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement between facilities. The district worked with contractor Educational Data Solutions, LLC out of Seattle Washington to update student generation factors. The updated rates are included in the body of the Plan. The student headcount enrollment forecast is updated annually. All Elementary schools now have Full Day Kindergarten so six-year Kindergarten projections were previously modified to meet the requirements for Full Day Kindergarten programs at all elementary schools. The district expects to receive some State Funding Assistance (formerly called “state matching funds”) for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded site and facility needs will be reviewed in the future. The impact fees for 2022 calendar year will change based on the percentage increase of the consumer price index for the Seattle metropolitan area. The increase for 2022 calendar year is 2.2% (Based on the OSPI Applied to LEA & Levy per pupil inflators CPI as of March 2021). For single-family residences, the fee will increase by $125.24 to $5818.06. The impact fee for multi-family units will increase by $52.90 to $2,457.53. 3334 34 3434 6.D.b Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan ITEM Grade/ Type FROM TO Increase/ Decrease Comments Student Generation Factor Elem 0.334 0.277 Single Family (SF)MS 0.078 0.071 SH 0.117 0.086 Total 0.529 0.435 -0.094 Decrease Student Generation Factor Elem 0.187 0.258 Multi-Family (MF)MS 0.043 0.058 SH 0.070 0.100 Total 0.300 0.416 0.116 Increase State Funding Assistance Ratios (“State Match”) 56.96%53.79%-3.17%Per OSPI Website Area Cost Allowance $225.97 $238.22 12.250 Per OSPI Website Average Assessed Valuation (AV)SF $423,247 $268,271 (154,976)Puget Sound ESD AV - Average of Condominiums & Apts.MF $164,546 $226,726 62,180 Puget Sound ESD Debt Service Capital Levy Rate / $1000 $1.41 $1.41 0.0 Per King Co. Assessor Report General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 2.16%2.44%0.28%Bond Buyers 20 year GO Index Impact Fee - Single Family SF $5,692.85 $5,818.09 $125.24 2.20% Impact Fee - Multi-Family MF $2,403.63 $2,457.53 $53.90 2.20% X - Appendices Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors Include: 3435 35 3535 6.D.b Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2022 Mirror Lake Elementary School Lake Grove Elementary School Wildwood Elementary School Totem Middle School Star Lake Elementary School Thomas Jefferson High School 6.D.b Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN June 29, 2021 BOARD OF EDUCATION Trudy Davis Hiroshi Eto Dr. Jennifer Jones Geoffery McAnalloy Luckisha Phillips SUPERINTENDENT Dr. Tammy Campbell Prepared by: Sally D. McLean, Chief Finance & Operations Officer Jennifer Thomas, Student & Demographic Forecaster 6.D.b Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 2-3 SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction 4 Inventory of Educational Facilities 5 Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities 6 Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities 7 Needs Forecast - New Facilities 8 Six Year Finance Plan 9 SECTION 2 MAPS Introduction 10 Map – City and County Jurisdictions 11 SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction 12 Building Capacities 13-15 Portable Locations 16-17 Student Forecast 18-20 SECTION 4 KING COUNTY, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, AND CITY OF KENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Introduction 21 Capacity Summaries 22-26 Impact Fee Calculations 27-28 Reference to Impact Fee Calculations 29-30 Student Generation Rates 31 Impact Fee Changes from 2021 to 2022 32 6.D.b Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2 INTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB) 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, City of Kent Ordinance No.4278 effective June 2018, revised January 2020, and the City of Auburn Ordinance No. 5078 effective 1998, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2021. This plan is scheduled to be submitted for consideration to each of the jurisdictions located with the Federal Way Public Schools’ service area: King County, the City of Kent, City of Federal Way and the City of Auburn and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is requested to be included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The City of Des Moines collects school impact fees as part of the SEPA process. The District has plans for beginning discussions with the City of Milton to adopt an ordinance for school impact fees for parcels located within the Federal Way School District’s service area is in process. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council for Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region’s need for housing, jobs, services, culture, and recreation. This Plan’s estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies or management need. During the 2016-17 school year the District formed a 100 member Facilities Planning Committee consisting of parents, community members and staff. The Committee was tasked with developing a recommendation to the Superintendent regarding Phase 2 of the District’s plan for school construction, remodeling, and/or modernization for voter consideration in November 2017. The voters passed this $450M bond authorization with a 62% YES vote reflecting a commitment to invest in the modernization of our infrastructure. Through the committee’s work a determination was made to rebuild Thomas Jefferson High School, Illahee Middle School, Totem Middle School, Lake Grove Elementary, Mirror Lake Elementary, Olympic View Elementary, Star Lake Elementary, and Wildwood Elementary. In addition to the school projects, the committee included a plan to modernize Memorial Stadium, which currently supports athletic activities for all schools. The rebuilding of the schools will create additional capacity for students at the elementary and high school levels. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 3 INTRODUCTION, continued The District continues to monitor factors that may have an impact on enrollment and capacity at our schools, including new single-family and multi-family residential developments and any impacts due to the COVID-19 stay home order. In accordance with the McCleary decision, the State has provided funding to reduce K-3 class size to 17 and 4-12 class size to 25.Beginning in 2019-20 the legislature expects compliance with this funding adding pressure to the need for elementary capacity. In response to this need the district has acquired the former Devry building renovating it into 42 elementary classrooms to provide permanent additional capacity. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 4 SECTION 1 - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. A Financial Plan that shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization listed follows this. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 5 INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (K-5) Adelaide 1635 SW 304th St Federal Way 98023 Brigadoon 3601 SW 336th St Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 298th St Auburn 98001 Enterprise 35101 5th Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Green Gables 32607 47th Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308th St Auburn 98001 Lake Grove 303 SW 308th St Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35827 32nd Ave S Auburn 98001 Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Rd Federal Way 98003 Meredith Hill 5830 S 300th St Auburn 98001 Mirror Lake 625 S 314th St Federal Way 98003 Nautilus (K-8) 1000 S 289th St Federal Way 98003 Olympic View 2626 SW 327th St Federal Way 98023 Panther Lake 34424 1st Ave S Federal Way 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368th St Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 34600 12th Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Silver Lake 1310 SW 325th Pl Federal Way 98023 Star Lake 4014 S 270th St Kent 98032 Sunnycrest 24629 42nd Ave S Kent 98032 Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320th St Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42nd Ave S Auburn 98001 Wildwood 2405 S 300th St Federal Way 98003 Woodmont (K-8) 26454 16th Ave S Des Moines 98198 MIDDLE SCHOOLS (6-8) Federal Way Public Academy (6-10) 34620 9th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Illahee 36001 1st Ave S Federal Way 98003 Kilo 4400 S 308th St Auburn 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 314th St Federal Way 98023 Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Rd Federal Way 98003 Sequoyah 3450 S 360th ST Auburn 98001 Totem 26630 40th Ave S Kent 98032 TAF @ Saghalie (6-12) 33914 19th Ave SW Federal Way 98023 HIGH SCHOOLS (9-12) Decatur 2800 SW 320th St Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 30611 16th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288th St Auburn 98001 Todd Beamer 35999 16th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Career Academy at Truman 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 ADDITIONAL SCHOOLS Internet Academy (K-12) 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Employment Transition Program (12+) 33250 21st Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Federal Way Open Doors 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Former DeVry Property (K-5) 3600 S 344th Way, Federal Way 98001 6.D.b Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 6 CURRENT INVENTORY NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Developed Property Central Kitchen 1214 S 332nd Federal Way 98003 Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308th St Federal Way 98003 Educational Services Center 33330 8th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Support Services Center 1211 S 332nd St Federal Way 98003 Leased Property Early Learning Center at Uptown Square 1066 S 320th St Federal Way 98003 Undeveloped Property Site # Location 75 SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW – 9.2 Acres 65 S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S – 8.8 Acres 60 E of 10th Avenue SW - SW 334th & SW 335th Streets - 10.04 Acres 73 N of SW 320th and east of 45th PL SW – 23.45 Acres 71 S 344th Street & 46th Avenue S - 17.47 Acres 82 1st Way S and S 342nd St – Minimal acreage 96 S 308th St and 14th Ave S – .36 Acres Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 7 NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES PHASE EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS As needed Purchase and Relocate Portables Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is Impact Fees. II Thomas Jefferson High School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Voter Approved Capital bond II Illahee Middle School Replace Existing Building Voter Approved Capital bond II Totem Middle School Replace Existing Building Voter Approved Capital bond II Lake Grove Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Voter Approved Capital bond II Mark Twain Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD, pending SCAP funding II Mirror Lake Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Voter Approved Capital bond II Olympic View K-8 School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Voter Approved Capital bond II Star Lake Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Voter Approved Capital bond II Wildwood Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Voter Approved Capital bond II Memorial Stadium Replace Existing Facility Voter Approved Capital bond II DeVry Property Temp Swing School Increase Capacity SCAP and K-3 Class size reduction funding III Decatur High School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Kilo Middle School Replace Existing Building TBD III Sacajawea Middle School Replace Existing Building TBD III Adelaide Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Brigadoon Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Camelot Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Lake Dolloff Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Nautilus K-8 School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Twin Lakes Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Woodmont K-8 School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD As part of the multi-phase modernization and replacement plan, the District intends to increase capacity for elementary and high school students with expansion at the Thomas Jefferson, Lake Grove, Mirror Lake, Olympic View, Star Lake, and Wildwood sites. Only projects in Phase II with plans to increase capacity are included in the impact fee calculation for this plan. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 8 NEEDS FORECAST - ADDITIONAL FACILITIES NEW FACILITY LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS No current plans for additional facilities. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Six Year Finance PlanSecured FundingSourcesImpact Fees (1) $1,066,016Land Sale Funds (2)($597,828)Bond or Levy Funds (3) $138,160,768K3-CSR & TAFA unclaimed expenditures (4) $9,924,730School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) (5)($5,291,681)TOTAL$143,262,005Projected RevenueSourcesSchool Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) (6) $94,839,867K-3 Class Size Reduction (7) $2,879,870Bond Funds (8) $115,000,000Land Fund Sales (9)$0Impact Fees (10) $1,800,000TOTAL$214,519,737Actual and Planned ExpendituresTotal Secured Funding and Projected Revenue$357,781,742NEW SCHOOLSEstimated and Budget 2021 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 Total Total CostPrior Years 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 2021-2028MODERNIZATION AND EXPANSIONLake Grove Elementary (11)$42,858,000$0$42,858,000Mirror Lake Elementary (11)$44,490,000$0$44,490,000Star Lake Elementary (11)$28,920,000$11,180,000$11,180,000$40,100,000Wildwood Elementary (11)$42,778,000$0$42,778,000Olympic View K-8 School (11)$2,338,000$16,362,000 $27,500,000$43,862,000$46,200,000Thomas Jefferson High School (11)$119,983,000$17,617,000$17,617,000$137,600,000Totem Middle School (11)$49,060,000$17,840,000$17,840,000$66,900,000Illahee Middle School (11)$0$5,200,000 $30,900,000 $36,900,000$73,000,000$73,000,000Memorial Stadium (11)$302,000$1,500,000 $25,100,000$26,600,000$26,902,000$0$0$0$0SITE ACQUISITIONFormer DeVry/ES 24 (12)$19,351,750$1,424,750 $1,421,500 $1,421,000 $1,423,000 $1,422,250 $1,423,750 $1,422,250 $9,958,500$29,310,250TEMPORARY FACILITIESPortables (13)$200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,400,000$1,400,000TOTAL$350,080,750 $69,823,750 $60,021,500 $40,021,000 $26,723,000 $1,622,250 $1,623,750 $1,622,250 $201,457,500 $551,538,250NOTES:`1 These fees are currently being held in a King County, City of Federal Way, City of Auburn, and City of Kent impact fee account, and will be available for use by the District for system improvements. This is year end balance on 12/31/20. 2 This is year end balance on 12/31/20.3 This is the 12/31/20 balance of bond funds and capital levy funds. This figure includes interest earnings.4 This represents the K3-CSR & TAFA unclaimed expenditures5 This represents the balance of SCAP funding.6 This is the balance of authorized and anticipated SCAP for the projects authorized by the voters in 2017.7 This is a secured K-3 Class size reduction grant.8 In November 2017, the District passed a $450M bond measure. The amount included in the finance plan is for projects that will create additional capacity. Only the costs associated with increasing capacity are included in school impact fee calculations. 9 There are no projected sale of surplus properties.10 These are projected fees based upon anticipated residential developments in the District, $25,000 per month over the next 6 years.11 Project budgets are updated as of April 2021 and reflective of actual Guaranteed Price Maximums and total project budgets for Lake Grove, Mirror Lake, Wildwood, Thomas Jeffereson, Star Lake, Totem, and DeVry.12 A former private university campus located in Federal Way was purchased in 2019 to provide up to 43 additional permanent elementary classrooms. Prior to creating new permanent capcity this location will be used as a temporary housing. These costs are excluded from impact fee calculations.13 These fees represent the cost of purchasing and installing new portables. The portable expenditure in future years may replace existing portables that are not functional.These may not increase capacity and are not included in the capacity summary.96.D.bPacket Pg. 82Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 10 SECTION 2 - MAPS Federal Way Public Schools has twenty-one elementary schools (grades K-5), two schools with a K-8 grade configuration, six middle school schools (grades 6-8), four high schools (grades 9-12) and four small secondary schools. The Federal Way Public Academy serves students in grades 6-10. The programs at Open Doors and Career Academy at Truman High School serves students in grades 9-12. In addition to these programs, TAF@Saghalie serves students in grades 6-12 who reside within the service area and the Employment and Transition Program (ETP) at the Norman Center serves 18-21 year old scholars. The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School districts are different. If the district does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single development. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the district and is not taken lightly. It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. The final map included represents the city and county boundaries which overlap with the district’s service areas. •City of Algona •City of Auburn •City of Des Moines •City of Federal Way •City of Kent •City of Milton •Unincorporated King County 6.D.b Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 11 MAP – CITY AND COUNTY JURISDICTIONS FWPS boundaries is 100% Urban Growth Area 6.D.b Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 12 SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities - The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast – 2022 through 2028 6.D.b Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 13 BUILDING CAPACITIES This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District’s “standard of service” in order to ascertain the District’s current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. In general, the District’s current target class size provides that the average class size for a standard classroom for grades K through 3 should be 17 students to comply with current legislation. In grades 4-5 the target is 25 students. For grades 6 to 12 the target class size is 26 students. Classrooms for students with Individualized Education Program (Special Education) needs are calculated at 12 seats per classroom. Historically, the District has used the OSPI square footage calculation as a baseline for capacity calculation and made adjustments for specific program needs. The District will continue to use this calculation for determining capacity at our middle and high schools. However, for elementary schools capacity will be calculated based on the number of classroom spaces and the number of students assigned to each classroom. Class Size Guidelines FWPS Historical “Standard of Service” HB2661/SHB2776 Enacted Law Square Footage Guideline Kindergarten 18.9 17 25-28 Grades 1-2 18.9 17 25-28 Grade 3 18.9 17 28 Grades 4-5 25 25 28 For the purposes of determining student capacity at individual schools, the following list clarifies adjustments to classroom spaces and the OSPI calculation. Special Education Resource Rooms: Each middle school requires the use of a standard classroom(s) for special education students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. English as a Second Language Programs: Each middle school and high school requires the use of a standard classroom for students learning English as a second language. Middle School Computer Labs: Each middle school has computer labs, except Totem Middle School. Wireless access has been installed at all secondary schools. If additional classroom space is needed, these computer labs may be converted to mobile carts. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 14 BUILDING CAPACITIES, continued High School Career Development and Learning Center (Resource) Room: Each high school provides special education resource room and career development classrooms for students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. Preschool/ECEAP/Headstart Our district currently offers preschool programs at multiple locations across the district. These programs decrease K-12 capacity. Early Childhood Education is an expanding need. Alternative Learning Experience: Federal Way offers students the opportunity to participate in an Alternative Learning Experience through our Internet Academy. These students have never been included in the capacity calculation of unhoused students. Due to COVID 19 and school closures many families elected to enroll in IA. We believe this is a temporary increase. This plan was prepared using historical IA data. 1418 Youth Reengagement: Federal Way offers students the opportunity to participate in 1418 Youth Reengagement Open Doors program. These students are housed at the Truman campus and have not been previously included in the capacity calculation of unhoused students. However, we have prepared this plan including approximately 25% of Open Doors enrollment. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 15 BUILDING CAPACITIES, continued ELEMENTARY BUILDING MIDDLE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount 1 Preschool School Name Headcount Adelaide 353 30 Illahee 855 Brigadoon 299 30 Kilo 779 Camelot 277 30 Lakota 786 Enterprise 345 15 Sacajawea 694 Green Gables 401 Sequoyah 585 Lake Dolloff 400 Totem 795 3 Lake Grove 600 TAF @ Saghalie 598 Lakeland 371 Federal Way Public Academy 183 Mark Twain 430 TOTAL 5,275 Meredith Hill 375 30 3 Mirror Lake 600 *Middle School Average 727 Nautilus (K-8)466 Olympic View 353 HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING Panther Lake 347 PROGRAM CAPACITY Rainier View 405 30 Sherwood Forest 390 6 School Name Headcount Silver Lake 400 Decatur 1243 Star Lake 337 Federal Way 1684 Sunnycrest 405 Thomas Jefferson 1224 Twin Lakes 341 30 Todd Beamer 1085 Valhalla 406 TAF @ Saghalie 155 3 Wildwood 600 30 Truman Campus (Career Academy and Open Doors)159 Woodmont (K-8)357 Federal Way Public Academy 116 TOTAL 9,258 231 Employment Transition Program 48 TOTAL 5,714 Elementary Average 403 2 High School Average 1,309 Notes: 1Preschool enrollment reduces capacity for K-5 students. 15 preschool students in one classroom. 2Federal Way Public Academy, Career Academy at Truman High School, and Employment Transition Program and TAF @ Saghalie for the high school school grade span (9-12) are non-boundary schools. These schools are not used in the calculated averages. 3Lake Grove and Wildwood opened January 2021; Mirror Lake and TJHS are scheduled to open September 2021 6.D.b Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 16 PORTABLE LOCATIONS The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not an efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as interim measures to house students when increasing population impacts a school attendance area. Portables may also be required to house students when new or changing programs require additional capacity. They also provide housing for students until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. With the launch of construction of new schools, a number of portables will be relocated, decommissioned, or sold. The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan PORTABLES LOCATED PORTABLES LOCATED AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS AT HIGH SCHOOLS NON NON INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL* INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL Adelaide 21Decatur 81 Brigadoon 1 Federal Way Camelot 1 Thomas Jefferson Enterprise 3 Todd Beamer 8 Green Gables 1 TOTAL 16 1 Lake Dolloff 5 Lake Grove Lakeland Mark Twain 3 Meredith Hill 3 PORTABLES LOCATED Mirror Lake AT SUPPORT FACILITIES Nautilus 5 Olympic View 2 MOT Panther Lake 4 TDC 9 Rainier View 5 Former TAFA Sherwood Forest 4 TOTAL 9 Silver Lake 4 Star Lake Sunnycrest 6 DISTRICT PORTABLES IN USE FOR ECEAP Twin Lakes 3 AND/OR HEADSTART Valhalla 4 Sherwood Forest 2 Wildwood Totem Woodmont 3 Total 2 TOTAL 50 10 PORTABLES LOCATED AT MIDDLE SCHOOLS NON INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL Illahee 21 Kilo 16 Lakota Sacajawea 5 Sequoyah 2 Totem TAF@ Saghalie 4 TOTAL 14 7 PORTABLE LOCATIONS 17 6.D.b Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 18 STUDENT FORECAST Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students. The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on birth rates within the district’s census tracts and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted. A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level. The Enrollment MasterTM software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment. In February 2018, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District. The report was complete in March 2018. The model used to forecast next year’s enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county-wide average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections. The long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes in the 5-19 age group for King County. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 19 STUDENT FORECAST, continued Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of something else (e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend for the school-age population over time. The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2026. This model produces a projection that is between 21,500 and 25,000 when applied to the low, medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models. Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington. Near term projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by current local economic conditions. The District tracks new development from five permitting jurisdictions. Long range planning assumes a student yield from proposed new housing consistent with historical growth patterns. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school district community in the future. Federal Way like many districts experienced a decline in enrollment particularly at the early elementary grades due to COVID-19. We anticipate our student forecast about a 50% recovery in the coming year. The balance of the forecast is based on previous growth indicators. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Percent Calendar Yr School Year Elementary Middle School High School Total K -12 Change 2016 2015-16 10,206 5,094 6,695 21,995 2017 2016-17 10,424 5,033 6,476 21,933 -0.3% 2018 2017-18 10,418 5,159 6,338 21,915 -0.1% 2019 2018-19 10,233 5,124 6,386 21,743 -0.8% 2020 2019-20 10,046 5,413 5,836 21,295 -2.1% 2021 2020-21 9,324 5,173 5,786 20,283 -5.0% 2022 B2021-22 9,450 5,191 6,197 20,838 2.7% 2023 P2022-23 9,507 5,222 6,234 20,963 0.6% 2024 P2023-24 9,602 5,274 6,297 21,173 1.0% 2025 P2024-25 9,679 5,317 6,347 21,342 0.8% 2026 P2025-26 9,756 5,359 6,398 21,513 0.8% 2027 P2026-27 9,873 5,423 6,474 21,771 1.2% 2028 P2027-28 9,952 5,467 6,526 21,945 0.8% Elementary K-5 Middle School 6-8 High School 9-12 October 1 Head Count Enrollment History and Projections 18,000 18,500 19,000 19,500 20,000 20,500 21,000 21,500 22,000 22,500 School Year Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast 20 6.D.b Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 21 SECTION 4 – KING COUNTY, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, AND CITY OF KENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Capacity Summaries Site & Construction Costs Allocations Student Generation Rates Impact Fee Calculations Reference to Impact Fee Calculations 6.D.b Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 22 CAPACITY SUMMARIES All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information, Portable Capacity information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The District has recently adjusted its capacity calculation method for Elementary schools to better show capacity needed to comply with the K-3 Class Size Reduction. This adjustment is also shown in the portable capacity calculation. In order to allow for flexibility in portable usage the District will use an average class size calculation of 21 for each Elementary portable and an average class size of 25 for each Middle and High School portable. The information is organized with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, middle school, and high school levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan CAPACITY SUMMARY - ALL GRADES Budget Calendar Year 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 CAPACITY School Year 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 20,005 20,242 20,380 20,992 20,992 20,992 20,992 Add Capacity 237 138 612 0000 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 20,242 20,380 20,992 20,992 20,992 20,992 20,992 ENROLLMENT Basic Headcount Enrollment 20,838 20,963 21,173 21,342 21,513 21,771 21,945 Internet Academy Headcount Enrollment1 (255) (255) (255) (255) (255) (255) (255) Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 20,583 20,708 20,918 21,087 21,258 21,516 21,690 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM FTE CAPACITY (341) (328)74 (95) (266) (524) (698) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY Current Portable Capacity 2,050 1,800 1,800 1,758 1,708 1,708 1,708 Add/Subtract Portable Capacity (250)0 (42) (50)000 Adjusted Portable Capacity 1,800 1,800 1,758 1,708 1,708 1,708 1,708 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 1,459 1,472 1,832 1,613 1,442 1,184 1,010 - - Projected - - 23 6.D.b Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan CAPACITY SUMMARY - ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Budget Calendar Year 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 CAPACITY School Year 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 BUILDING PROGRAM HEAD COUNT CAPACITY 9,016 9,016 9,154 9,766 9,766 9,766 9,766 Add/Subtract capacity total 01386120000 Add capacity at1: Star Lake 138 De Vry 612 Olympic View K-8 0 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 9,016 9,154 9,766 9,766 9,766 9,766 9,766 ENROLLMENT Basic Headcount Enrollment 9,450 9,507 9,602 9,679 9,756 9,873 9,952 Internet Academy Headcount2 (20) (20) (20) (20) (20) (20) (20) Basic Headcount Enrollment without Internet Academy 9,430 9,487 9,582 9,659 9,736 9,853 9,932 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY (414) (333)184 107 30 (87) (166) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY3 Current Portable Capacity 1,050 1,050 1,050 1,008 1,008 1,008 1,008 Add/Subtract portable capacity 00(42)0000 Add portable capacity at: Subtract portable capacity at: Lake Grove Mirror Lake Star Lake Wildwood Olympic View K-8 (42) Adjusted Portable Capacity 1,050 1,050 1,008 1,008 1,008 1,008 1,008 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 636 717 1,192 1,115 1,038 921 842 NOTES: 1 2 3 - - Projected - - Capacity increases are projected based on a design to accommodate 525 students. Increased capacity is currently stated as the difference between current calculated capacity and the projected design. In order to reduce elementary class size, Devry capacity is calculated at 17 scholars per classroom. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. This represents historic enrollment. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only based on class size capacity of 21. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. 24 6.D.b Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan CAPACITY SUMMARY - MIDDLE SCHOOLS Budget Calendar Year 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 CAPACITY School Year 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 Add/Subtract capacity 0000000 Add capacity at: Totem 1 Illahee Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 ENROLLMENT Basic Headcount Enrollment 5,191 5,222 5,274 5,317 5,359 5,423 5,467 Internet Academy2 (55) (55) (55) (55) (55) (55) (55) Basic Enrollment without Internet Academy 5,136 5,167 5,219 5,262 5,304 5,368 5,412 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY 139 108 56 13 (29) (93) (137) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY3 Current Portable Capacity 350 350 350 350 300 300 300 Add/Subtract portable capacity 000(50)000 Totem Middle School Sacajawea Middle School Illahee Middle School (50) Adjusted Portable Capacity 350 350 350 300 300 300 300 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 489 458 406 313 271 207 163 NOTES: 1 2 3 - - Projected - - Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only based on class size capacity of 25. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. This represents historic enrollment. Totem and Illahee Middle Schools currently have capacity for 800 & 850 students respectively, so no new capacity is anticipated with the rebuild of these older buildings. 25 6.D.b Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan CAPACITY SUMMARY - HIGH SCHOOLS Budget Calendar Year 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 CAPACITY School Year 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 5,714 5,951 5,951 5,951 5,951 5,951 5,951 Add/Subtract capacity 237000000 Thomas Jefferson High School 4 237 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5,951 5,951 5,951 5,951 5,951 5,951 5,951 ENROLLMENT Basic Headcount Enrollment 6,197 6,234 6,297 6,347 6,398 6,474 6,526 Internet Academy1 (180) (180) (180) (180) (180) (180) (180) Basic Ed without Internet Academy 6,017 6,054 6,117 6,167 6,218 6,294 6,346 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY (66) (103) (166) (216) (267) (343) (395) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY2 Current Portable Capacity 650 400 400 400 400 400 400 Add/Subtract portable capacity (250)000000 Thomas Jefferson High School 4 (250) Adjusted Portable Capacity 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY3 334 297 234 184 133 57 5 NOTES: 1 2 3 - - Projected - - Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only based on class size capacity of 25. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. This represents historic enrollment. Capacity for unhoused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and no planning time in some classrooms. 26 6.D.b Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan STUDENT GENERATIONSingle Family Student GenerationNumber of Number of Number of Number of Elementary Middle School High School TotalSingle Family Elementary Middle School High School Student StudentStudent StudentDEVELOPMENTDwellingsStudentsStudents Students FactorFactorFactorFactor19-Pacific Heights633000.04760.00000.00000.047619-Havenwood Park714120.06350.01590.03170.098618-Retreat Meadows5689110.12700.14290.17460.500018-Wyncrest II416010.09520.00000.01590.170718-Soundview Manor210000.00000.00000.00000.000017-Eagle Manor124210.06350.03170.01590.583317-Lakehaven Estates130100.00000.01590.00000.076917-Hibbford Glen154640.06350.09520.06350.933317-Vista Pointe10526450.41270.06350.07940.3333Total397552324Student Generation*0.13850.05790.06050.2569Multi-Family Student Generation - City of Federal WayNumber of Number of Number of Number of Elementary Middle School High School TotalMulti Family Elementary Middle School High School Student StudentStudent StudentDEVELOPMENTDwellingsStudentsStudents Students FactorFactorFactorFactor21-Watermark13518750.13330.05190.03700.222217-Uptown Square30812275890.39610.24350.28900.928617-Kitt's Corner21615479600.71300.36570.27781.3565Total659294161154Student Generation*0.44610.24430.23370.9241* Student Generation rate is based on totals.276.D.bPacket Pg. 100Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 28 IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Single and Multi-Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substantially adopted by the City of Auburn, Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that district. Impact Fee Calculation On page 30, the 2021 variables for the calculation of the Impact Fee for single family and multi-family units based on King County Code 21A and the Growth Management Act, generate the results below: Plan Year 2021 Plan Year 2022 Single Family Units $3,243 Multi-Family Units $16,003 Mixed-Use Residential1 $8,001 Impact Fee Calculation - King County Code 21A The Impact Fees have changed as a result of changes in several factors. The updates made to the variables in the Impact Fee calculation, generate a change in the Impact Fee between the 2021 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2022 Capital Facilities Plan. A summary of these changes can be found on page 32 and a year over year comparison of formula variables can be found on page 33. 1 In accordance with the City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249. $1,845 $15,073 $7,536 6.D.b Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan 2022 IMPACT FEE School Site Acquisition Cost:Student Student Facility Cost / Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 11.97 $384,077 697 0.1385 0.4461 $914 $2,942 Middle School 0.0579 0.2443 $0 $0 High School 0.0605 0.2337 $0 $0 TOTAL $914 $2,942 School Construction Cost:Student Student % Perm Fac./ Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total Sq Ft Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 95.40% $44,267,128 709 0.1385 0.4461 $8,250 $26,571 Middle School 97.25% 0.0579 0.2443 $0 $0 High School 98.79% $15,171,887 237 0.0605 0.2337 $3,823 $14,780 TOTAL $12,073 $41,351 Temporary Facility Cost:Student Student % Temp Fac. Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total Sq Ft Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 4.60% 0.1385 0.4461 $0 $0 Middle School 2.75% 0.0579 0.2443 $0 $0 High School 1.21% 0.0605 0.2337 $0 $0 TOTAL $0 $0 School Construction Assistance Program Credit Calculation:Student Student Construction Cost Sq. Ft. State Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Allocation/Sq Ft Student Match SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary $238.22 90 65.59% 0.1385 0.4461 $1,948 $6,273 Middle School $238.22 0.0579 0.2443 $0 $0 High School $238.22 130 65.59% 0.0605 0.2337 $1,228 $4,747 Total $3,176 $11,020 Tax Payment Credit Calculation SFR MFR Average Assessed Value (April 2020) $378,910 $193,630 Capital Bond Interest Rate (February 2021) 2.44% 2.44% Net Present Value of Average Dwelling $3,326,551 $1,699,925 Years Amortized 10 10 Property Tax Levy Rate $1.84 $1.84 Present Value of Revenue Stream $6,121 $3,128 Single Family Multi-Family Mixed-Use Residences Residences Residential1 Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost 914$ 2,942$ 2,942$ Permanent Facility Cost 12,073$ 41,351$ 41,351$ Temporary Facility Cost -$ -$ -$ State Match Credit (3,176)$ (11,020)$ (11,020)$ Tax Payment Credit (6,121)$ (3,128)$ (3,128)$ Sub-Total 3,690$ 30,145$ 30,145$ 50% Local Share 1,845$ 15,073$ 15,073$ Calculated Impact Fee 1,845$ 15,073$ 7,536$ City of Kent Impact Fee2 1,845$ 9,450$ 1In accordance with the City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 2In accordance with the City of Kent Ordinance No. 4278, rev 11/20 CFP 2022 ‐ Working Excel Documents.xlsx 29 6.D.b Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 30 Consistent with the capacity calculations described earlier, the District uses the OSPI square footage calculation for determining capacity at our secondary schools. Based on this methodology, the following construction costs for Thomas Jefferson High School are allocated as the proportionate share: REFERENCES TO IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS, continued Square Footage Capacity at approx. 131 sq. ft. Current: 179,119 1378 Planned: 210,000 1600 Increased Capacity 237 Increase as % 16.11% GMP $94,176,828 Proportionate Share $15,171,887 The District will use the above formulas created as a base for future Capital Facilities Plans during the life of the current bond authorization. The capacity of these schools may vary from year to year as programs are added or changed and construction cost may increase over time. FACILITIES CAPACITY Permanent Facility Capacity: Changes to the Building Program Capacities calculation are found on page 15. Capacity Summaries: The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 22-26. Student Generation Factor Analysis: Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single-family units and multi-family units. The factors used in the 2021 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single-family units and multi-family units that were constructed in the District in the last five (5) years and can be found on the next page Temporary Facility Cost: The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on pages 16 and 17. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 31 REFERENCES TO IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS SCHOOL ACQUISITION COST The district purchased the former Devry Technical School building to house displaced scholars during school construction then will provide permanent capacity for Early Childhood Education programs. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COST With voter approval of the $450,000,000 bond package, design work is underway for six of the approved projects. Anticipated construction budgets (based on the Guaranteed Maximum Price or GMP) have been updated to reflect the final construction contracts, plus amendments. In addition, a credit for the cost of new construction is incorporated to recognize the K-3 Class Size Reduction Grant obtained by Federal Way Public Schools. The following table outlines the facility cost included in the impact fee calculation: Elementary Schools Lake Grove Mirror Lake Star Lake Wildwood Elementary TOTAL Permanent Capacity 353 404 387 472 1616 New Capacity 600 600 525 600 2325 Increased Capacity as % 43.9% GMP $31.475,730 $33,007,391 $30,163,111 $32,609,529 $127,255,761 Proportionate Share $ 55,865,279 K-3 Class Size Credit ($ 11,598,151) Net Proportionate Share $ 44,267,128 Two additional projects are within this horizon, but not yet included – Olympic View K-8 and Mark Twain Elementary. These costs will be incorporated into future Capital Facilities Plans. Current Middle School capacity calculations do not reflect unhoused students, so no costs associated with Illahee Middle School or Totem Middle School are included. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Changes from 2021‐22 Item From/To Comment Percent of Permanent Facilities 96.11% to 95.86%Report #3 OSPI Percent Temporary Facilities 3.89% to 4.24%Updated portable inventory Average Cost of Portable $189,941 to $169,579 Updated 5-yr rolling average of Classrooms portables purchased and placed by 2016. Construction Cost Allocation $238.22 to $238.22 Change effective July 2020 State Match 64.71% to 65.59%Change effective July 2020 Average Assessed Value Per King County Assessor's Office SFR- $383,189 to $378,910 SFR: Single-family residences and Mobile Homes MFR- $156,304 to $193,630 MFR: Apartments and Condos Capital Bond Interest Rate 2.44% to 2.44%Market Rate Property Tax Levy Rate $1.86 to $1.84 King County Treasury Division Student Generation Factors Updated Housing Inventory Single-Family Elementary .1809 to .1385 Middle School .0691 to .0579 High School .0987 to .0605 Multi-Family Elementary .5064 to .3946 Middle School .2523 to .2161 High School .2523 to .2067 Impact Fee SFR- $3,243 to $1,845 SFR based on the updated calculation MFR -$16,003 to $15,073 MFR based on the updated calculation City of Kent SFR- $3,243 to $1,845 SFR based on the updated calculation MFR -$9,193 to $9,450 MFR maximum per City of Kent Ordinance No. 4278, rev 11/20 Note: Student generation factors for our single family units are based on new developments constructed within the District over the last five (5) years prior to the date of the fee calculation. Student generation factors for are multi-family units are based on new developments constructed within the District over the last five (5) years prior to the date of the fee calculation. 32 6.D.b Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2021 through 2027 Auburn School District No. 408 Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors June 14, 2021 6.D.b Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Dr. Alan Spicciati, Superintendent City of Algona City of Kent City of Pacific City of Black Diamond BOARD of DIRECTORS Tracy Arnold Laurie Bishop Unincorporated King County City of Auburn Arlista Holman Sheilia McLaughlin Laura Theimer 915 Fourth Street NE Auburn, Washington 98002 (253) 931-4900 Serving Students in: 6.D.b Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Section I Executive Summary........................................................................Page 1 Section II Enrollment Projections and Student Generation Factors................Page 7 Section III Standard of Service........................................................................Page 18 Section IV Inventory of Facilities......................................................................Page 26 Section V Pupil Capacity.................................................................................Page 30 Section VI Capital Construction Plan...............................................................Page 33 Section VII Impact Fees....................................................................................Page 37 Table of Contents 6.D.b Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2021 through 2027 Section I Executive Summary 6.D.b Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan 2 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2021 through 2027 I. Executive Summary This six-year Capital Facilities Plan (the “Plan”) has been prepared by the Auburn School District (the “District”) as the District’s principal planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington’s Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This Plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2021. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District’s needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic long-range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period; other factors and trends in the use of facilities; and other needs of the District as may be required. However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this six-year Capital Facilities Plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and within the Cities of Auburn, Black Diamond and Kent; the King County Council, the City of Auburn, the City of Black Diamond, and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction’s respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of Algona and Pacific, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act and the local ordinances, this Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. The Plan establishes the District’s “standard of service” in order to ascertain the District’s current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the District’s specific needs. In general, the District’s current standard provides that class size for grades K-3 should not exceed 17 students and class size for grades 4-5 should not exceed 27 students. When averaged over the six elementary school grades, this computes to 20.33 students per classroom. Class size for grade 6 should not exceed 27 students and class size for grades 7 and 8 should not exceed 28.53 students. When averaged over the three middle school grades, this computes to 28.02 students per classroom. Class size for 9-12 should not exceed 28.74 students, with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers. Decisions by current legislative actions may create the need for additional classrooms. (See Section III for more specific information.) The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The District’s 6.D.b Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan 3 2020-21 capacity was 17,082. The actual number of individual students was 16,702 as of October 1, 2020. (See Section V for more specific information.) The Capital Construction Plan shown in Section VI addresses the additions and proposed modernization to the District’s existing facilities. The plan includes the ongoing replacement of five elementary schools and one middle school, construction of two new elementary schools, and acquisition of future school sites to accommodate growth. The new facilities are required to meet the projected elementary school class size reductions mandated by the State of Washington and student population increases generated by the large development areas within the Auburn School District. Three areas that have significant impact on the school district are the Lakeland South, Lea Hill, and the valley areas of the district. There are also other development pockets that impact the District. The District completed a comprehensive review of all district facilities in October 2008. A Steering Committee made recommendations to the Board for capital improvements to existing facilities and replacement of seven schools over the next ten years. These recommendations led to a capital improvements levy and a bond issue that was placed on the ballot in March 2009. Both ballot measures were unsuccessful in March. The Board determined to rerun only the capital improvements levy in November 2009, which the voters approved. In the fall of 2011, the Board determined to move forward with the Auburn High School Modernization and Reconstruction Project and placed the project before the voters in February of 2012. The bond issue was supported by the community at nearly 57% approval rate, but was short of the super majority requirement of 60%. In March of 2012, the Board determined to rerun the bond in November of 2012. In November 2012, the bond passed at 62%. The project was completed during the summer of 2016. In the spring of 2016, the Board determined to move forward with the replacement of six schools and the construction of two new elementary schools. The project was placed before the voters in November 2016 and the bond passed at 62.83%. The first of the projects, the replacement of Olympic Middle School, started construction in May 2018 and opened in Fall 2019. The district’s new elementary, Bowman Creek Elementary, started construction in May 2019 and opened in August 2020.Construction for replacement of Dick Scobee Elementary School started in June 2019 and the school opened in August 2020. Construction of new Elementary School #16 and construction of the replacement Pioneer Elementary School started May 2020. Both are scheduled to open in the Fall of 2021. Construction for the replacement of both Lea Hill Elementary School and Chinook Elementary School started in June 2021. The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn, City of Black Diamond and City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the fiscal impacts incurred by a district experiencing growth and development. Section VII sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multi-family dwelling units. The student generation factors have been developed using the students who actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and multi-family developments constructed in the last five years. There have been dramatic changes in the student generation factors for single and multi-family in the past five years. The District plans to carefully monitor the numbers over the next several years to determine if this is a trend or an anomaly. The method of collecting the data is with the use of GIS mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County 6.D.b Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan 4 GIS, data from Davis Demographics and integration of the mapping with student data from the District’s student data system. This method gives the District actual student generation numbers for each grade span for identified developments. This data is contained in Appendix A.3. For purposes of this 2021 update, the District is choosing to continue to use the 2020 Student Generation Factor data given that remote learning and COVID-related enrollment disruption likely presents an inaccurate data set of the students generated from recent new development. The District will obtain updated data to calculate Student Generation Factors for the 2022 update to this Plan. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2021 through 2027 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2020 Capital Facilities Plan that are a part of the 2021 Plan. The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference. Section I Executive Summary A. Updated to reflect new information within the Plan. B. Summary level list of changes from previous year. Section II Enrollment Projections A. Updated projections. See Section II & Appendices A.1. Section III Standard of Service A. Updated to reflect current number of classrooms allocated to non-standard classroom uses. Section IV Inventory of Facilities A.Add 2 portables at Mt. Baker Middle School B.Add 3 portables at Cascade Middle School. C.Add 4 portables at Olympic Middle School. D.Add 2 portables at Rainier Middle School. E.Add 2 portables at Auburn High School. F.Add 2 portables at Auburn Mountainveiw High School. G.Add 2 portables at Auburn Riverside High School. H.Remove 13 portables from Lea Hill Elementary School.* I.Remove 6 portables from Chinook Elementary School.** J.Remove 1 portable from Gildo Rey Elementary School. K.Remove 1 portable from Terminal Park Elementary School. *Note; Two portable classrooms at Lea Hill Elementary School will move to JPF Admininstration Bldg. **Note: Two portable classrooms at Chinook Elementary School will be demolished. Section V Pupil Capacity The 19 portables to be relocated in July 2021 are needed to accommodate enrollment increases. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2021 through 2027 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 Impact Fees CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2020 to 2021 CPF CPF 2020 2021 EXPLANATION Student Generation Factors Single Family Consistent with King County Ordinance 11621, Elementary 0.2500 0.2500 Student Generation Factors are calculated Middle School 0.1310 0.1310 by the school district based on district Sr. High 0.1520 0.1520 records of average actual student generation Multi-Family rates for new developments constructed Elementary 0.4330 0.4330 over the last five years. Middle School 0.1850 0.1850 Sr. High 0.1750 0.1750 For the purposes of this 2021 update, the District is choosing to continue to use the 2020 Student Generation Factor data given that remote learning and COVID-related enrollment disruption likely presents an inaccurate data set of the students generated from recent new development. The District will obtain updated data to calculate Student Generation Factors for the 2022 update to this Plan. School Construction Costs Elementary $60,200,000 Middle $112,000,000 Site Acquisition Costs Cost per acre $404,377 $444,771 Updated estimate based on 10% annual inflation. Area Cost Allowance Boeckh Index $225.97 $238.22 Updated to current OSPI schedule. (July 2020) Match % - State 66.32%62.87%Updated to current OSPI schedule (May 2020) Match % - District 33.68%37.13%Computed District Average AV Single Family $374,661 $402,640 Updated from March 2021 King County Dept of Assessments data. Multi-Family $160,501 $197,141 Updated from March 2021 King County Dept of Assessments data using average AV for apartments and condominiums. Debt Serv Tax Rate $2.41 $2.31 Current Fiscal Year GO Bond Int Rate 2.44%2.44%Current Rate (Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-14) DATA ELEMENTS From new school construction cost estimate in April 2021. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2021 through 2027 Section II Enrollment Projections and Student Generation Factors 6.D.b Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2021 through 2027 7 Student Enrollment Projections Projection techniques give consideration to historical and current data as a basis for forecasting the future. In addition, certain assumptions must be made about the variables in the data being used. Forecasting can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future or from the known to the unknown. The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, psychological, economic, and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection. An example of this is with the COVID-19 pandemic. The logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today and will be in the future. It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over time. The basis of enrollment projections in the Auburn School District has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group of students in a grade level as it progresses through time. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. If all students in one grade level progress to the next, the cohort number would be 1.00. If fewer students from the group progress the number will be less than 1. The district has used this method with varying years of history (3 years, 6 years, 10 years and 13 years) as well as weighted factors to study several projections. The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact. This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections. Monitoring deviation is critical to the viability and creditably of the projections derived by these techniques. Summary of 2021-22 Enrollment Projections Table 1 shows historical enrollment for the October 1 count in the Auburn School District over the past 20 years. The data shows overall average growth over the recent 10 years is 1.24%. This average, however, includes the -4.22% decrease in October 2020 enrollment due to the COVID pandemic. Without this anomaly year, the average growth is at 1.58%. Enrollment growth between 2012 and 2019 averaged over 2%. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2021 through 2027 8 6.D.b Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2021 through 2027 9 Due to the pandemic, it was important to consider the impact the current enrollment will have on future projections. Using the Cohort Survival method, the decrease in enrollment of 4.22% in October 2020 will skew enrollment projections for 2021 and beyond. Some of the assumptions made in calculating projections for the 2021-22 school year are: 1. Kindergarten enrollment will return to pre-pandemic levels. a. ASD Kindergarten classes are approximately 5% of births in King County. In the year 2016, there were 26,011 live births in King County projecting approximately 1,300 students will be in Kindergarten in October 2021. 2. 2020-21 Kindergarteners who will be first graders in 2021 will return to “normal” pre- COVID levels. 3. ASD will realize the enrollment growth due to new housing in 2021. Calculations were made to create cohort scenarios based upon the following survival ratios: 3- year average, 3-year weighted average, 6-year average, 6-year median, and the 10-year average. Two of the scenarios (3-year weighted average and 3-year average) were not considered because of the impact October 2020 had on the calculation. The decision was made to use the 6-year median scenario which is found in Table 2 below. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2021 through 2027 10 6.D.b Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2021 through 2027 11 Student Generation Factors Planned residential development data is collected to determine the number of new residential units that may be built in the near future. The projected units will have the appropriate Student Generation Factor applied to determine the number of new students that planned residential development might yield. This data was obtained through discussions with the major developers within the District boundaries, the City of Algona, Auburn, Kent, Pacific, King County, and District officials. The student population by residence includes all approved and tentative tract maps in addition to any planned or proposed development that possibly will occur within the project timeframe. The planned residential development information and phasing estimates are a snapshot of the District as of this time. The information may change and is updated annually. Closely related to the planned residential development units are Student Generation Factors. When applied to planned residential development units, the Student Generation Factors determine how many additional students will be generated from new construction within the District. Two sets of data are used to calculate Student Generation Factors: current student enrollment and current housing data. This information associates each student with a housing unit. Two general housing categories are analyzed: Single Family and Multi-Family. Data showing the number of students generated from previous single- and multi-family developments generates the Student Generation Factor to be applied to future developments. The tables on the next two pages show the information for both single-and multi-family developments. The components include: ● “Development Name” is a list of developments in process of filling occupancy. Fully occupied developments stay on the list for five years contributing to the Student Generation Factor. Once the five years is up, the development is removed from the list. This component includes the name of the development, year of full occupancy (if applicable), the number of units, the amount of current units occupancy and the remaining units to be occupied. ● “Feeder Pattern” shows the elementary, middle and high school feeder pattern associated with the development. ● “Actual Students” is the data of actual students generated from the units already occupied. ● “Student Generation Factors” is the calculation of actual students divided by the number of occupied units. ● “Single Family--2021 and beyond” lists the developments that are in process, but have not yet started to occupy units. ● The units for these developments are multiplied by the Student Generation Factor for each to determine the “Estimated Students Based on Student Generation Factors” 6.D.b Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2021 through 2027 12 The table at the bottom of the page shows an estimated timeline of when the unoccupied units are scheduled to be occupied. Table 3 shows the single- and multiple-family units to be occupied, the estimated number of students generated and a timeline by year of when those students would potentially be enrolled. The bottom table reflects a cumulative number over a period of 7 school years. The final page repeats enrollment projections by grade and summarized into grade bands. Table 5 takes the projected enrollment by school year and added the projected students generated for each school year to get an updated total projected enrollment. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan 13 SINGLE FAMILY Elem Middle HS Total Elem Middle HS Total Alicia Glenn 2016 28 28 0 Elementary 16 6 10 13 29 0.214 0.357 0.464 1.036 Anthem (formerly Megan's Meadows)2018 13 13 0 Ilalko 14 4 1 19 1.077 0.308 0.077 1.462 Bridges 380 355 25 Aurthur Jacobsen 69 31 57 157 0.194 0.087 0.161 0.442 Canyon Creek 2018 151 151 0 Evergreen Hts.29 9 9 47 0.192 0.060 0.060 0.311 Dulcinea 2018 6 6 0 Lea Hill 1 2 0 3 0.167 0.333 0.000 0.500 Hastings 10 7 3 Evergreen Hts.0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Hazel View 2018 22 22 0 Lea Hill 8 8 4 20 0.364 0.364 0.182 0.909 Kendall Ridge 2015 106 106 0 Elementary 16 28 13 14 55 0.264 0.123 0.132 0.519 Lakeland East Portola 2015 130 130 0 Bowman Creek 43 26 32 101 0.331 0.200 0.246 0.777 Lakeland Hills Estates 2017 66 66 0 Bowman Creek 21 8 11 40 0.318 0.121 0.167 0.606 Edgeview at Lakeland Hills 2015 368 368 0 Bowman Creek 81 40 50 171 0.220 0.109 0.136 0.465 Lakeland: Pinnacle Estates 2018 99 99 0 Bowman Creek 51 32 24 107 0.515 0.323 0.242 1.081 Villas at Lakeland Hills 2015 81 81 0 Bowman Creek 30 15 7 52 0.370 0.185 0.086 0.642 Lozier Ranch 18 4 14 Chinook 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Monterey Park 2016 238 238 0 Evergreen Hts.50 30 29 109 0.210 0.126 0.122 0.458 Mountain View 2018 55 55 0 Evergreen Hts.6 0 7 13 0.109 0.000 0.127 0.236 Omnia Palisades Plate 16 3 13 Alpac 0 1 1 2 0.000 0.333 0.333 0.667 Seremounte 2019 30 30 0 Aurthur Jacobsen 7 5 8 20 0.233 0.167 0.267 0.667 Sonata Hills 2017 69 69 0 Lea Hill 10 2 8 20 0.145 0.029 0.116 0.290 Spencer Place 2017 13 13 0 Hazelwood 10 7 3 20 0.769 0.538 0.231 1.538 Vasiliy 8 1 7 Terminal Park 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Willow Place 11 10 1 Elementary 16 0 0 4 4 0.000 0.000 0.400 0.400 Totals 1918 1855 63 464 243 282 989 0.250 0.131 0.152 0.533 Auburn School District Development Growth since 1/1/15 May 2020 (Based on Oct 1, 2019 Enrollment) Development Name Year of Full Occupancy Units/ Parcels Current Occupancy To Be Occupied Feeder Elementary Actual Students Student Generation Factors For purposes of this 2021 update, the District is choosing to continue to use the 2020 Student Generation Factor data given that remote learning and COVID-related enrollment disruption likely presents an inaccurate data set of the students generated from recent new development. The District will obtain updated data to calculate Student Generation Factors for the 2022 update to this Plan. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft 14 SINGLE FAMILY--2020 and beyond Middle HS Total Anderson Acres 14 0 14 2 2 7 Backbone Ridge 7 0 7 1 1 4 Bridle Estates 18 0 18 2 3 10 Hastings 10 *10 0 10 1 2 5 Greenvale 17 0 17 2 3 Lakeland: Forest Glen At ..30 0 30 4 5 16 Lakeland: Park Ridge 256 0 256 34 39 136 Lakeland: River Rock*14 0 14 2 2 7 Pacific Lane 11 0 11 1 2 6 Ridge At Tall Timbers 104 0 104 14 16 55 Richardson BLA/Plat 6 0 6 1 1 3 Huntionton Woods 74 0 74 10 11 39 Topaz Short Plat 4 0 4 1 1 2 Oxbow Acres 3 0 3 0 0 2 Wyncrest II 41 0 41 5 6 22 Wesport Capital 306 0 306 40 47 163 Current Partially Occupied Developments 1918 1855 63 8 10 34 2833 978 Totals 128 149 521 * currently under construction 8 64 4 For purposes of this 2021 update, the District is choosing to continue to use the 2020 Student Generation Factor data given that remote learning and COVID-related enrollment disruption likely presents an inaccurate data set of the students generated from recent new development. The District will obtain updated data to calculate Student Generation Factors for the 2022 update to this Plan. 19 1 1 26 2 3 10 77 16 245 Current Occupancy To Be Occupied 3 4 4 2 5 Student Generation Factors Elem Auburn School District Development Growth since 1/1/15 May 2020 (Based on Oct 1, 2019 Enrollment) Estimated Students Based on Development Name Units/ Parcels 6.D.b Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft 15 MULTI FAMILY Elem Middle HS Total Elem Middle HS Total Promenade Apts 2018 294 294 0 Lea Hill 205 98 90 393 0.697 0.333 0.306 1.337 The Villas at Auburn 2018 295 295 0 Washington 50 11 13 74 0.169 0.037 0.044 0.251 Totals 589 589 0 255 109 103 467 0.433 0.185 0.175 0.793 2020 and beyond Sundallen Condos 48 0 48 21 9 8 38 Auburn Town Center Apt 226 0 226 98 42 40 179 Copper Gate Apt.500 0 500 216 93 87 396 Current Partially Occupied Developments 589 589 0 0 0 0 0 1363 774 Total 335 143 135 614 Feeder Elementary Actual Students Student Generation Factors Auburn School District Development Growth since 1/1/15 May 2020 (Based on Oct 1, 2019 Enrollment) For purposes of this 2021 update, the District is choosing to continue to use the 2020 Student Generation Factor data given that remote learning and COVID-related enrollment disruption likely presents an inaccurate data set of the students generated from recent new development. The District will obtain updated data to calculate Student Generation Factors for the 2022 update to this Plan. Units/ Parcels Units/ Parcels Current Occupancy To Be Occupied Estimated Students Based on Student Generation Factors Development Name Year of Full Occupancy Current Occupancy To Be Occupied 6.D.b Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft 16 BASE DATA - BUILDOUT SCHEDULE ASSUMPTIONS:2021 Single Family Multi-Family Elementary 0.25 0.433 2. Some development data received from Davis Demographics. Middle 0.131 0.185 High 0.152 0.175 Total 0.533 0.793 TABLE 3 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total Single Family Units 22 65 82 44 9 1 1 224 Elementary (K-5)6 16 21 11 2 0 0 56 Middle (6-8)3 9 11 6 1 0 0 29 High (9-12)3 10 12 7 1 0 0 34 Total K-12 12 35 44 23 5 1 1 119 Multi-Family Units 350 126 0 0 0 0 0 476 Elementary (K-5)152 55 0 0 0 0 0 206 Middle (6-8)65 23 0 0 0 0 0 88 High (9-12)61 22 0 0 0 0 0 83 Total K-12 278 100 0 0 0 0 0 377 Total Housing Units 372 191 82 44 9 1 1 700 Projected Students Elementary (K-5)157 71 21 11 2 0 0 262 Middle (6-8)68 32 11 6 1 0 0 117 High (9-12)65 32 12 7 1 0 0 117 Total K-12 289 135 44 23 5 1 1 497 Cumulative Projection 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Elementary (K-5)157 228 248 259 262 262 262 Middle (6-8)68 99 110 116 117 117 117 High (9-12)65 97 109 116 117 117 117 Total K-12 289 424 468 491 496 496 497 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS 1. Build out estimates are received from developers. Units to be Occupied Projected Students Projected Students 6.D.b Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan 17 TABLE 4 Enrollment Projections by Grade GRADE 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Kinder 1,038 1,308 1,271 1,224 1,212 1,254 1,240 1 1,236 1,066 1,344 1,306 1,258 1,245 1,288 2 1,243 1,263 1,090 1,373 1,335 1,285 1,272 3 1,243 1,268 1,289 1,112 1,401 1,362 1,311 4 1,257 1,267 1,293 1,313 1,133 1,428 1,388 5 1,294 1,274 1,284 1,310 1,331 1,148 1,447 6 1,306 1,287 1,267 1,276 1,302 1,323 1,142 7 1,319 1,330 1,310 1,290 1,300 1,326 1,348 8 1,264 1,335 1,346 1,326 1,305 1,315 1,342 9*1,351 1,431 1,511 1,523 1,501 1,477 1,489 10 1,376 1,391 1,473 1,555 1,568 1,545 1,521 11 1,174 1,291 1,304 1,382 1,459 1,471 1,449 12 1,090 1,140 1,253 1,266 1,341 1,416 1,428 Totals 16,191 16,650 17,034 17,257 17,446 17,596 17,665 *Grades 9-12 include Full-Time Running Start, Open Doors and Grad Alliance program enrollment. TABLE 4a Enrollment Projections by Grade Band 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 K-5 7,311 7,446 7,571 7,638 7,670 7,722 7,946 6-8 3,889 3,952 3,923 3,892 3,907 3,965 3,832 9-12 4,991 5,253 5,541 5,726 5,869 5,910 5,887 Totals 16,191 16,651 17,035 17,256 17,446 17,596 17,665 TABLE 5 Enrollment Projections by Grade Band plus Estimated Students Generated Based upon Developments 2020-21 projection projected students generated total projection projection projected students generated total projection projection projected students generated total projection projection projected students generated total projection projection projected students generated total projection K-5 7,311 7,446 157 7,603 7,571 71 7,642 7,638 21 7,659 7,670 11 7,681 7,722 2 7,724 6-8 3,889 3,952 68 4,020 3,923 32 3,955 3,892 11 3,903 3,907 6 3,913 3,965 1 3,966 9-12 4,991 5,253 65 5,318 5,541 32 5,573 5,726 12 5,738 5,869 7 5,876 5,910 1 5,911 Totals 16,191 16,651 289 16,940 17,035 135 17,170 17,256 44 17,300 17,446 23 17,469 17,596 5 17,601 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 6.D.b Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2021 through 2027 Section III Standard of Service 6.D.b Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan 19 The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn, City of Black Diamond and the City of Kent indicatethat each school district must establish a "Standard of Service" in order to ascertain the overall capacity to houseits projected student population. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage "capacity" guidelines for computing state funding support. The fundamental purpose of the OSPI guidelines is to provide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching funds for school construction projects. By default these guidelines have been used to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population. The OSPI guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, facility configurations, emerging educational reform, or the dynamics of each student's educational program. The Auburn School District Standard of Service addresses those local considerations that require space in excess of the OSPI guidelines. The effect on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation pattern. Conditions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without accompanying computations. OVERVIEW As reflected in enrollment numbers for the 2020-21 school year, the Auburn School District operates fifteen elementary schools housing 7,311 students in grades K through 5. The four middle schools house 3,889 students in grades 6 through 8. The District operates three comprehensive senior high schools and one alternative high school, housing 4,991 students in grades 9 through 12. (Source: October 1, 2020 Enrollment) CLASS SIZE The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the student population. Specialists create additional space needs. Class sizes are subject to collective bargaining agreements. Changes to class size agreements can have significant impact on available space. The current pupil/teacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 20.33 students per teacher. Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 20.33 students per room at grades K - 5. At grades 6 - 8 the limit is set at 28.02 students per room. At grades 9 - 12 the limit is set at 28.74 students per room. The OSPI space allocation for each grade articulation level, less the computed reduction for the Auburn School District Standard of Service, determines the District's capacity to house projected pupil populations. These reductions are shown below by grade articulation level. STRUCTURED LEARNING FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate to severe disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses 15 classrooms to provide for 135 students. The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. No loss of capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to total elementary population. PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates an adaptive behavior program for students with behavior disabilities at the elementary school level. The program uses three classrooms to provide for 24 students. The housing requirements for this program exceed the OSPI space allocations. (Three classrooms @ 20.33 - 8 = 12.33) Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 12.33 each =(37) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 12.33 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(37) Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2021 through 2027 STANDARD OF SERVICE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS 6.D.b Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan 20 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2021 through 2027 STANDARD OF SERVICE SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities. Twenty standard classrooms are required to house this program. The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the OSPI space guidelines at Lakeland Hills, Dick Scobee, and Bowman Creek Elementary Schools. Continued loss of capacity is expected as growth in program is larger than the total elementary population. Loss of Permanent Capacity 17 (20-3) rooms @ 20.33 each =(346) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(346) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the elementary level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 20.33 each =(20) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(20) EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a pre-school program for young children below age five with disabilities. This program is housed at eleven different elementary schools and currently uses 13 standard classrooms. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 13 rooms @ 20.33 each =(264) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(264) READING LABS The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional language arts instruction. These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces if available in each elementary school. Four elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available, thus they are housed in a standard classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 20.33 each =(102) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(102) MUSIC ROOMS The Auburn School District elementary music programs require one acoustically-modified classroom at each school for music instruction. The housing requirements are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @ 20.33 each =(305) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(305) 6.D.b Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan 21 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2021 through 2027 STANDARD OF SERVICE ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates pullout programs at the elementary school level for students learning English as a second language. This program requires 30 standard classrooms that are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 30 rooms @ 20.33 each =(610) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(610) SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for eight highly-impacted elementary schools. This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade level and do not receive other services. This program requires eight standard classrooms that are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 20.33 each =(163) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(163) ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a learning specialist program to increase literacy skills for first and second graders. This program model was originally created from the I-728 funds and currently has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms, as well as pulling out students into designated classrooms. The district is utilizing classrooms at all fourteen elementary schools. Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @ 20.33 each =(305) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(305) EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates an ECEAP program for 236 pre-school aged children in twelve sections of half-day length and one full-day program. The program is housed at seven elementary schools and utilizes seven standard elementary classrooms and one additional classroom space and seven auxiliary office spaces. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 20.33 each =(142) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(142) 6.D.b Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan 22 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2021 through 2027 STANDARD OF SERVICE SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level. This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific disabilities. Eleven classrooms are required at the middle school level to provide for approximately 330 students. The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior disabilities. The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses two classrooms. One of the two classrooms for this program are provided for in the OSPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 rooms @ 28.02 each =(28) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (28) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates seven structured learning classrooms at the middle school level for students with moderate to severe disabilities. Two of the seven classrooms for this program are provided for in the OSPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 28.02 each =(140) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (140) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the middle school level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 28.02 each =(28) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (28) ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for English Language Learner students. This program requires ten standard classrooms that are not provide for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 28.02 each =(280) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (280) MIDDLE SCHOOLS 6.D.b Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan 23 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2021 through 2027 STANDARD OF SERVICE ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. OSPI Report #3 dated 12/14/11 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the mid-level facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 28.02 each =(224) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (224) 6.D.b Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan 24 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2021 through 2027 STANDARD OF SERVICE NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the high school level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 28.74 each =(29) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (29) SENIOR HIGH COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District support standard allows for one open computer lab at each of the senior high schools. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 28.74 each =(115) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (115) ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at three comprehensive high schools for English Language Learner students. This program requires twelve standard classrooms that are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 12 rooms @ 28.74 each =(345) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (345) PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior diabilities. The program is housed at one of the high schools and uses two classrooms. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 28.74 each =(57) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (57) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates twelve structured learning center classrooms for students with moderate to severe disabilities. This program is housed at three high schools requiring standard classrooms that are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 12 rooms @ 28.74 each =(345) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (345) SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 6.D.b Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan 25 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2021 through 2027 STANDARD OF SERVICE SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities. The current high school program requires 15 classrooms to provide program to meet educational needs of the students. The OSPI space guidelines provide for one of the 15 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 28.74 each =(402) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (402) PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center. The OSPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity. This space was not intended for, nor is it usable for, classroom instruction. It was constructed to provide a community center for the performing arts. Using OSPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet computes to 208 unhoused students or 7.25 classrooms. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7.25 rooms @ 28.74 each =(208) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. There are 185 teaching stations available in the senior high facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 10 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 28.74 each =(287) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (287) STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS ELEMENTARY Loss of Permanent Capacity (2,294) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (2,294) MIDDLE SCHOOL Loss of Permanent Capacity (701) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (701) SENIOR HIGH Loss of Permanent Capacity (1,789) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,789) TOTAL Loss of Permanent Capacity (4,783) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (4,783) 6.D.b Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2021 through 2027 Section IV Inventory of Facilities 6.D.b Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2021 through 2027 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES 27 Table IV.1 shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OSPI rated capacities. Table IV.2 shows the number and location of each portable by school. The district uses relocatable facilities to: 1. provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting, 2. make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique student needs, and 3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on existing physical plants. Core facilities (i.e. gymnasiums, restrooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc.) are not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable classrooms. District School Facilities Building Capacity Acres Address Elementary Schools Washington Elementary 494 5.33 20 E Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Terminal Park Elementary 415 6.09 1101 D Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Dick Scobee Elementary 819 8.90 1031 14th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Pioneer Elementary 441 8.40 2301 M Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Chinook Elementary 461 10.99 3502 Auburn Way South, Auburn WA, 98092 Lea Hill Elementary 450 20.24 30908 124th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Gildo Rey Elementary 566 10.05 1005 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Evergreen Heights Elem. 463 10.10 5602 South 316th, Auburn WA, 98001 Alpac Elementary 505 10.68 310 Milwaukee Boulevard North, Pacific WA, 98047 Lake View Elementary 581 16.44 16401 Southeast 318th Street, Auburn WA, 98092 Hazelwood Elementary 594 13.08 11815 Southeast 304th Street, Auburn WA, 98092 Ilalko Elementary 592 14.23 301 Oravetz Place Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Lakeland Hills Elementary 594 12.00 1020 Evergreen Way SE, Auburn WA, 98092 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 614 10.02 29205 132nd Street SE, Auburn WA, 98092 Bowman Creek Elementary 812 22.03 5701 Kersey Way SE, Auburn, WA 98092 ELEMENTARY CAPACITY 8401 Middle Schools Cascade Middle School 837 16.94 1015 24th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Olympic Middle School 974 17.45 839 21st Street SE, Auburn WA, 98002 Rainier Middle School 843 25.54 30620 116th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Mt. Baker Middle School 837 30.00 620 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3491 Senior High Schools West Auburn HS 233 5.26 401 West Main Street, Auburn WA, 98001 Auburn HS 2,127 23.74 711 East Main Street, Auburn WA, 98002 Auburn Riverside HS 1,387 35.32 501 Oravetz Road, Auburn WA, 98092 Auburn Mountainview HS 1,443 39.42 28900 124th Ave SE, Auburn WA, 98092 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5,190 TOTAL CAPACITY 17082 Table Permanent Facilities IV.1 @ OSPI Rated Capacity (March 2021) 6.D.b Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan nmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmnmknmnmAdministration BuildingAlpac ESArthur Jacobsen ESAuburn HSAuburn Mountainview HSAuburn Riverside HSBowman Creek ESCascade MSChinook ESDick Scobee ESElementary 16Evergreen Heights ESGildo Rey ESHazelwood ESIlalko ESLake View ESLakeland Hills ESLea Hill ESMt Baker MSOlympic MSPioneer ESRainier MSTerminal Park ESWashington ESWest Auburn HSS T A T E R O U T E 1 6 7AUBURN WAY NAUBURN WAY SA U B U R N -E N U M C L A W R D S E SR 167SR 167SR 18SR 18Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID,IGN, and the GIS User CommunityAUrban Growth BoundarySSSnlE6.D.bPacket Pg. 137Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2021 through 2027 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES 29 TABLE TEMPORARY/RELOCATABLE IV.2 FACILITIES INVENTORY (June 2021) Elementary Location 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027 Washington 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Terminal Park 8 7 0 0 0 0 0 Dick Scobee 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pioneer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Chinook 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lea Hill 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gildo Rey 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 Evergreen Heights 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Alpac 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Lake View 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Hazelwood 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Ilalko 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Lakeland Hills 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Arthur Jacobsen 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Bowman Creek 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Elementary #16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 72 51 44 44 44 44 44 TOTAL CAPACITY 1,464 1,037 895 895 895 895 895 Middle School Location 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027 Cascade 1 4 6 6 6 6 6 Olympic 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 Rainier 9 11 11 11 11 11 11 Mt. Baker 10 12 12 12 12 12 12 TOTAL UNITS 24 35 37 37 37 37 37 TOTAL CAPACITY 672 981 1,037 1,037 1,037 1,037 1,037 Sr. High School Location 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027 West Auburn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Auburn High School 0 2 4 4 4 4 4 Auburn High School - *TAP 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Auburn Riverside 13 15 16 16 16 16 16 Auburn Mountainview 4 6 8 8 8 8 8 TOTAL UNITS 18 24 29 29 29 29 29 TOTAL CAPACITY 517 690 833 833 833 833 833 *TAP - Transition Assistance Program for 18-21 year old students with special needs. COMBINED TOTAL UNITS 114 110 110 110 110 110 110 COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY 2,654 2,707 2,765 2,765 2,765 2,765 2,765 6.D.b Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2021 through 2027 Section V Pupil Capacity 6.D.b Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2021 through 2027 PUPIL CAPACITY 31 While the Auburn School District uses the OSPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from which to determine space needs, the District's educational program requires more space than that provided for under the formula. This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in Section III, Standard of Service. The District's capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional space to house its programs. Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new funded facilities. The combined effect of these adjustments is shown on Line B in Tables V.1 and V.2 below. Table V.1 shows the Distict's capacity with relocatable units included and Table V.2 without these units. Table V.1 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 A.SPI Capacity 17,082 17,082 17,291 18,330 18,565 18,565 18,565 18,565 A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 650 A.2 SPI Capacity-Replacements 209 389 235 A.3 SPI Capacity-New MS 800 B.Capacity Adjustments (2,129)(2,018)(2,018)(2,018)(2,018)(2,018)(2,018)(2,018) C.Net Capacity 14,953 15,273 16,312 16,547 16,547 16,547 16,547.17,347. D.ASD Enrollment 16,702 16,650 17,034 17,257 17,446 17,596 17,665 17,665 3/E.ASD Surplus/Deficit (1,749)(1,377)(722)(710)(899)(1,049)(1,118)(318) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Include Relocatable 2,654 2,765 2,765 2,765 2,765 2,765 2,765 2,765 2/Exclude SOS (pg 17)(4,783)(4,783)(4,783)(4,783)(4,783)(4,783)(4,783)(4,783) Total Adjustments (2,129)(2,018)(2,018)(2,018)(2,018)(2,018)(2,018)(2,018) Table V.2 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 A.SPI Capacity 17,082 17,082 17,291 18,330 18,565 18,565 18,565 18,565 A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 650 A.2 SPI Capacity-Replacements 0 209 389 235 A.3 SPI Capacity-New MS 800 B.Capacity Adjustments (4,783)(4,783)(4,783)(4,783)(4,783)(4,783)(4,783)(4,783) C.Net Capacity 12,299 12,508 13,547 13,782 13,782 13,782 28,364 14,582 D.ASD Enrollment 16,702 16,650 17,034 17,257 17,446 17,596 17,665 17,665 3/E.ASD Surplus/Deficit (4,403)(4,142)(3,487)(3,475)(3,664)(3,814)10,699 (3,083) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS 2/Exclude SOS (pg 17)(4,783)(4,783)(4,783)(4,783)(4,783)(4,783)(4,783)(4,783) Total Adjustments (4,783)(4,783)(4,783)(4,783)(4,783)(4,783)(4,783)(4,783) 1/New facilities shown in 2019-20 through 2023-24 are funded by the 2016 School Bond Issue. 2/The Standard of Service represents 27.69% of OSPI capacity. When new facilities are added the Standard of Service computations are decreased to 24.16% of SPI capacity. 3/Students beyond the capacity are accommodated in other spaces (commons, library, theater, shared teaching space). Capacity WITH relocatables Capacity WITHOUT relocatables 6.D.b Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2021 through 2027 PUPIL CAPACITY 32 A.Elementary Schools Building 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 Washington 494 494 494 494 494 494 494 494 Terminal Park 415 415 415 650 650 650 650 650 Dick Scobee 819 819 819 819 819 819 819 819 Pioneer 441 650 650 650 650 650 650 650 Chinook 461 461 650 650 650 650 650 650 Lea Hill 450 450 650 650 650 650 650 650 Gildo Rey 566 566 566 566 566 566 566 566 Evergreen Heights 463 463 463 463 463 463 463 463 Alpac 505 505 505 505 505 505 505 505 Lake View 581 581 581 581 581 581 581 581 Hazelwood 594 594 594 594 594 594 594 594 Ilalko 592 592 592 592 592 592 592 592 Lakeland Hills 594 594 594 594 594 594 594 594 Arthur Jacobsen 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 Bowman Creek 812 812 812 812 812 812 812 812 Elementary #16 ----650 650 650 650 650 650 ELEMENTARY CAPACITY 8,401 8,610 9,649 9,884 9,884 9,884 9,884 9,884 B.Middle Schools Building 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 Cascade 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 Olympic 974 974 974 974 974 974 974 974 Rainier 843 843 843 843 843 843 843 843 Mt. Baker 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 Middle School #5 --------------800 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3,491 3,491 3,491 3,491 3,491 3,491 3,491 4,291 C.Senior High Schools Building 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 West Auburn 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 Auburn 2,127 2,127 2,127 2,127 2,127 2,127 2,127 2,127 Auburn Riverside 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 Auburn Mountainview 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5,190 5,190 5,190 5,190 5,190 5,190 5,190 5,190 COMBINED CAPACITY 17,082 17,291 18,330 18,565 18,565 18,565 18,565 19,365 @ SPI Rated Capacity (March 2021) PERMANENT FACILITIES 6.D.b Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2021 through 2027 Section VI Capital Construction Plan 6.D.b Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2021 through 2027 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN 34 The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974 with the formation of a community wide citizens committee. The result of this committee's work was published in the document titled 'Guidelines for Development.' In 1985 the Board formed a second Ad Hoc citizens committee to further the work of the first and address the needs of the District for subsequent years. The work of this committee was published in the document titled 'Directions for the Nineties.' In 1995 the Board commissioned a third Ad Hoc citizens committee to make recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and physical facilities. The committee recommendations are published in the document titled 'Education Into The Twenty-First Century - - A Community Involved.' The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop plans for the implementation, funding, and deployment of technology throughout the District's programs. The 1996 Bond proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate technological applications. The 1998 Capital Levy provided funding to further deploy technology at a level sufficient to support program requirements in every classroom and department. In 2005, 2014, and 2020, replacement technology levies were approved to continue to support technology across all facets of the District’s teaching, learning and operations. In addition to the technology needs of the District, the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District must prepare for continued student enrollment growth. As stated in their report, "the District must pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible." The Ad Hoc recommendation included commentary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent rates of tax assessments. A proposition was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that provided $8,000,000 over six years to address some of the technology needs of the District; and $5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire school sites. During the 1997-98 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Dieringer School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population from an area that includes a large development known as Lakeland South. Lakeland South at that time was immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the Auburn School District. On June 16, 1998, the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Dieringer Boards of Directors. On June 22, 1998, the Auburn School Board adopted Resolution No. 933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 23, 1998, the Dieringer School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 24-97-98 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from Dieringer to Auburn containing most of the Lakeland South development and certain other undeveloped properties. Property for the third comprehensive high school was acquired in 1999. The Board placed the proposition to construct a new high school on the ballot four times. Each election was extremely close to passing. After the fourth failure a community meeting was held and from that meeting the Board determined need for further community study. In April of 2002, the Board formed a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two items and make recommendations to the Board in the Fall of 2002: a. A review of the conclusion and recommendations of 1985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees related to accommodating high school enrollment growth. This included the review of possible financing plans for new facilities. b. Develop recommendations for accommodating high school enrollment growth for the next 10 years if a new senior high school is not built. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2021 through 2027 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN 35 This committee recommended the Board place the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in February 2003. The February election approved the new high school at 68.71% yes votes. The school opened in the fall of 2005. In the fall of 2003, the Board directed the administration to begin the planning and design for Elementary #13 and Elementary #14. In the fall of 2004, the Board passed Resolution No. 1054 to place two elementary schools on the ballot in February 2005. The voters approved the ballot measure in February of 2005 at 64.72%. Lakeland Hills Elementary (Elementary #13) opened in the fall of 2006. Arthur Jacobsen Elementary (Elementary #14) is located in the Lea Hill area and opened in the fall of 2007. These two elementary schools were built to accommodate the housing growth in Lakeland Hills and Lea Hill areas of the school district. In the 2004-05 school year, the Board convened a sixth Citizen’s Ad Hoc committee to again study and make recommendations about the future impacts in the District. One of the areas of study was the need for New Facilities and Modernization. The committee made a number of recommendations including school size, the need for a new middle school, and to begin a capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities based upon criterion. During the 2005-06 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Kent School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population that will come from an area that includes a number of projected developments in the north Auburn valley. On May 17, 2006, the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Kent Boards of Directors. On June 14, 2006, the Kent School Board adopted Resolution No. 1225 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 26, 2006, the Auburn School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 1073 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from the Kent School District to the Auburn School District effective September 29, 2006. In October of 2008, after two years of review and study, a Steering Committee made recommendations to the Board regarding the capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities as recommended by the 2004-05 Citizen’s Ad Hoc Committee. These recommendations, based on specific criteria, led to the Board placing a school improvement bond and capital improvements levy on the ballot in March 2009. Voters did not approve either measure that would have updated 24 facilities and replaced three aging schools. The Board decided to place only a six- year Capital Levy on the ballot in November of 2009, which passed at 55.17%. The levy funded $46.4 million of needed improvement projects at 24 sites over the following seven school years. Planning for the replacement of aging schools was started with educational specifications and schematic design process for the replacement of Auburn High School. The District acquired a site for a future high school in 2008 and a second site for a future middle school in 2009. The District also continued efforts to acquire property around Auburn High School. The Special Education Transition Facility opened in February of 2010. This facility is designed for students with disabilities that are 18 to 21 years old. In the November 2012 election, the community supported the $110 million bond issue for the Auburn High School Modernization and Reconstruction Project at 62%. Construction began in February 2013. The entire new building was occupied by Auburn High School students and staff in the fall of 2015, with site improvements being completed during the 2015-16 school year. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2021 through 2027 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN 36 In January 2015, a citizen’s ad hoc committee was convened by direction of the Board to address growth and facilities. The major recommendations were to construct two new elementary schools in the next four years and to acquire 3 new elementary school sites as soon as possible. In the November 2016 election, the community supported the $456 million bond issue for the replacement of six schools and the construction of two new elementary schools at 62.83%. Construction for the replacement of Olympic Middle School began in May 2018 and was completed in Fall 2019. Construction for New Elementary School #15 began in May 2019 and was completed in Fall 2020. Construction for the replacement of Dick Scobee Elementary School began in June 2019 and was completed in Fall 2020. Construction for New Elementary School #16 and replacement of Pioneer Elementary School began in May 2020 and will be completed in Fall 2021. Construction for replacement of Chinook and Lea HIll Elementary Schools began in June 2021 and will be completed in Fall of 2022. Construction for replacement of Terminal Park Elementary School will begin in June 2022 and will be completed in Fall of 2023. We anticipate running a Capital Bond Measure in 2026. Funds will be used to construct a new middle school on property currently owned by the District, and may include funds to replace one or more existing schools. The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years. The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population. 2021-27 Capital Construction Plan (May 2021) Projected Fund Project Timelines Project Funded Cost Source 21-22 22-23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 Technology Modernization 2020 Yes $35,000,000 6 Year XX XX XX XX XX XX Cap. Levy 1/ Portable Relocation Yes $1,400,000 Impact Fees XX 1/ Property Purchase - 1 New Elementary Yes $7,500,000 Bond Impact Fee XX 2/ Middle School #5 Yes $112,000,000 Bond Impact Fee XX plan XX const XX const XX open 1/ Replacement of five Elementary Schools Yes $242,500,000 Bond XX const XX const XX open 1/ These funds may be secured through a combination of the 2016 Bond Issue, sale of real property, impact fees, and state matching funds. 2/ These funds may be secured through a combination of a bond issue, impact fees, and state matching funds. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2021 through 2027 Section VII Impact Fees 6.D.b Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2021 through 2027 38 IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION (Spring 2021) I. SITE COST PER RESIDENCE Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Size) x Student Factor Site Cost/ Facility Student Generation Factor Cost/Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Family Elem (K - 5)15 $0 650 0.2500 0.4330 $0.00 $0.00 Middle Sch (6 - 8)25 $0 800 0.1310 0.1850 $0.00 $0.00 Sr High (9 - 12)40 $0 1500 0.1520 0.1750 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 II. PERMANENT FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCE Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Size) x Student Factor) x (Permanent to Total Square Footage Percentage) Facility Facility % Perm Sq Ft/Student Generation Factor Cost/Cost/ Single Family Cost Size Total Sq Ft Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Family Elem (K - 5)$0 650 0.9459 0.2500 0.4330 $0.00 $0.00 Mid Sch (6 - 8)$112,000,000 800 0.9459 0.1310 0.1850 $17,348.09 $24,499.22 Sr High (9 - 12)$0 1500 0.9459 0.1520 0.1750 $0.00 $0.00 $17,348.09 $24,499.22 III. TEMPORARY FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCE Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Size) x Student Factor) x (Temporary to Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Facility % Temp Sq Ft/Student Generation Factor Cost/Cost/ Single Family Cost Size Total Sq Ft Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Family Elem (K - 5)$200,000 20.33 0.0541 0.2500 0.4330 $133.02 $230.38 Mid Sch (6 - 8)$200,000 28.02 0.0541 0.1310 0.1850 $50.57 $71.42 Sr High (9 - 12)$200,000 28.74 0.0541 0.1520 0.1750 $57.21 $65.86 $240.79 $367.67 IV. STATE MATCH CREDIT PER RESIDENCE Formula: (Boeckh Index x SPI Footage x District Match x Student Factor) Boeckh SPI State Cost/Cost/ Index Footage Match Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Family Elem (K - 5)$0.00 90 62.87%0.2500 0.4330 $0.00 $0.00 Mid Sch (6 - 8)$238.22 108 62.87%0.1310 0.1850 $2,118.93 $2,992.38 Sr High (9 - 12)$0.00 130 62.87%0.1520 0.1750 $0.00 $0.00 $2,118.93 $2,992.39 Student Generation Factor 6.D.b Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2021 through 2027 39 V. TAX CREDIT PER RESIDENCE Formula: Expressed as the present value of an annuity TC = PV(interest rate,discount period,average assd value x tax rate) Ave Resid Curr Dbt Serv Bnd Byr Indx Number of Tax Credit Tax Credit Assd Value Tax Rate Ann Int Rate Years Single Family Multi Family Single Family $402,640 $2.31 2.44%10 $8,165.58 Multi Family $197,141 $2.31 2.44%10 $3,998.04 VI. DEVELOPER PROVIDED FACILITY CREDIT Formula: (Value of Site or Facility/Number of dwelling units) Value No. of Units Facility Credit Single Family $0.00 1 $0.00 Multi Family $0.00 1 $0.00 FEE PER UNIT IMPACT FEES RECAP Single Multiple SUMMARY Family Family Site Costs $0.00 $0.00 Permanent Facility Const Costs $17,348.09 $24,499.22 Temporary Facility Costs $240.79 $367.67 State Match Credit ($2,118.93)($2,992.39) Tax Credit ($8,165.58)($3,998.04) FEE (No Discount)$7,304.37 $17,876.45 FEE (50% Discount)$3,652.19 $8,938.23 Less ASD Discount $0.00 $0.00 Facility Credit $0.00 $0.00 Net Fee Obligation $3,652.19 $8,938.23 6.D.b Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2021 through 2027 40 SINGLE FAMILY MULTI FAMILY IMPACT FEE ELEMENTS Elem Mid Sch Sr High Elem Mid Sch Sr High K - 5 6 - 8 9 - 12 K - 5 6 - 8 9 - 12 Student Factor Single Family - Auburn actual count April 2020 0.250 0.131 0.152 0.433 0.185 0.175 New Fac Capacity 650 800 1500 650 800 1500 New Facility Cost Middle School Cost Estimate May 2021 $112,000,000 $0 $112,000,000 Temp Rm Capacity ASD District Standard of Service.20.33 28.02 28.74 20.33 28.02 28.74 Grades K - 5 @ 20.33, 6 - 8 @ 28.02, & 9 - 12 @ 28.74. Temp Facility Cost Relocatables, including site work, set up, and furnishing.$200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 Site Acreage ASD District Standard or SPI Minimum 12 25 40 12 25 40 Site Cost/Acre See below $444,771 $444,771 $444,771 $444,771 $444,771 $444,771 Perm Sq Footage 15 Elementary, 4 Middle, and 4 High Schools 1,799,423 1,799,423 1,799,423 1,799,423 1,799,423 1,799,423 Temp Sq Footage 2 x 768 SF + 24 x 864 SF + 87 x 896 SF + TAP 2661 102,885 102,885 102,885 102,885 102,885 102,885 Total Sq Footage Sum of Permanent and Temporary above 1,902,308 1,902,308 1,902,308 1,902,308 1,902,308 1,902,308 % - Perm Facilities Permanent Sq. Footage divided by Total Sq. Footage 94.59%94.59%94.59%94.59%94.59%94.59% % - Temp Facilities Temporary Sq. Footage divided by Total Sq. Footage 5.41%5.41%5.41%5.41%5.41%5.41% SPI Sq Ft/Student From OSPI Regulations (WAC 392-343-035)90 108 130 90 108 130 Boeckh Index From OSPI projection for July 2020 $238.22 $238.22 $238.22 $238.22 $238.22 $238.22 Match % - State From OSPI May 2020 62.87%62.87%62.87%62.87%62.87%62.87% Match % - District Computed 37.13%37.13%37.13%37.13%37.13%37.13% Dist Aver AV King County Department of Assessments March 2020 $402,640 $402,640 $402,640 $197,141 $197,141 $197,141 Debt Serv Tax Rate Current Fiscal Year $2.31 $2.31 $2.31 $2.31 $2.31 $2.31 G. O Bond Int Rate Current Rate - (Bond Buyer 20 Index Feb. 2020 avg)2.44%2.44%2.44%2.44%2.44%2.44%e Site Cost Projections Recent Property Purchase Purchase Purchase Adjusted Projected Annual Sites Latest Date Projected Acquisitions Acreage Year Price Cost/Acre Present Day Inflation Factor Required of Acquisition Cost/Acre Elem. #16 Parcel 1 1.26 2019 $480,000 $382,166 $441,401 10.00%Elementary 2022 $489,248 Elem. #16 Parcel 2 8.19 2019 $2,959,561 $361,363 $417,374 2019 Annual 2020 Annual 2021 Annual Elem. #16 Parcel 3 0.80 2018 $460,000 $575,000 $730,538 Inflation Factor Inflation Factor Inflation Factor Total 10.25 $3,899,561 $380,593 $444,771 10.00%5%10.00% 6.D.b Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft School District Capital Facilities Plans General Statistics School District: Kent Federal Way Auburn Student Generation Rates Single-Family Elementary Middle Senior High .277() .071() .086() 0.1385() 0.0579() 0.0605 () 0.250(-) 0.131(-) 0.152(-) Multi-Family Elementary Middle Senior High .258() .088() .100() 0.3946 () 0.2161() 0.2067 () 0.433(-) 0.185(-) 0.175(-) Enrollment 2020-2021 24,582() 20,283() 16,191() 6.D.b Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan 1 School Impact Fees – 2021-2022 ORDINANCE NO. ________ AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending Section 12.13.160 of the Kent City Code to adjust the school impact fee schedules (CPA-2020-4). RECITALS A. The City of Kent has adopted a school impact fee program as authorized by the State Growth Management Act (GMA) and RCW 82.02.050. B. Chapter 12.13 of the Kent City Code (KCC) requires that the Capital Facilities Plans of school districts be submitted to the City of Kent on an annual basis for City Council review, and that this review must occur in conjunction with any update of the Capital Facilities Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City Council has reviewed the Capital Facilities Plans submitted by the school districts. C. The Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts have requested amendments to the text of Kent City Code to reflect proposed changes to impact fees. Highline School District has not requested an impact fee for this year. D. On September 13, 2021, the City provided the required 60 6.D.b Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan 2 School Impact Fees – 2021-2022 day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 to the State of Washington of the City’s proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan and Chapter 12.13 of the KCC. The 60 day notice period has passed and by operation of law is deemed approved. E. After a public hearing before the City Council on October 19, 2021, the City Council on November 16, 2021, approved Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-2020-4 to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts, and changes to the Kent City Code to reflect impact fees as follows: (1) for the Kent School District, increasing the school impact fee for single-family units to $5,818, and for multifamily units to $2,458; (2) for the Federal Way School District, decreasing the school impact fee for single-family units to $1,845, and for multifamily units to $9,450; and (3) for the Auburn School District, decreasing the school impact fee for single-family units to $3,652, and increasing the school impact fee for multifamily units to $8,938. F. In order to implement the new impact fee schedules referenced above, it is necessary to amend section 12.13.160 KCC. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE SECTION 1. – Amendment. Section 12.13.160 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 12.13.160. Base fee schedule. The following fee shall be assessed for the indicated types of development: 6.D.b Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan 3 School Impact Fees – 2021-2022 School District Single-Family Multifamily Multifamily Studio Kent, No. 415 $5,693 5,818 $2,405 2,458 $0.00 Federal Way, No. 210 $3,243 1,845 $9,450 0.00 Auburn, No. 408 $6,456 3,652 $9,450 8,938 0.00 Highline, No. 401 $0 $0 0.00 SECTION 2. – Amendment. Section 12.13.170 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 12.13.170. Maximum allowable fees. School impact fees provided by this chapter shall be assessed based on the calculation set forth in KCC 12.13.140, unless they exceed a maximum allowable fee as set forth in this section. There shall be an increase in the maximum allowable fee each year by the same percentage as the percentage change in the previous calendar year’s average monthly Engineering News Record (ENR) Seattle Area Construction Cost Index values, relative to the corresponding average monthly ENR Construction Cost Index values for the preceding year, as calculated from August 1st through July 30th. The maximum allowable fee is set at $10,044 9,274 for single-family dwelling units and a maximum of $10,234 9,450 for multifamily dwelling units for 2022. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan 4 School Impact Fees – 2021-2022 SECTION 3. - Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering; or references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations. SECTION 4. – Severability. If any one or more section, subsection, or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, that decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5. – Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law. DANA RALPH, MAYOR Date Approved ATTEST: KIMBERLEY A. KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted Date Published APPROVED AS TO FORM: PAT FITZPATRICK, CITY ATTORNEY S:\Permit\Plan\COMP_PLAN_AMENDMENTS\2018\School District Cap Fac Plans\Schoolimpact Fees-2019 Ord.Docx 6.D.b Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft Ordinance (2885 : Comprehensive Plan Impact Fees History 2005 – Present Single-Family Multifamily Kent* Federal Way Auburn Kent Federal Way Auburn 2022 $5,818 $1,845 $3,652 2022 $2,458 $9,450 $8,938 2021 $5,693 $3,243 $6,456 2021 $2,405 $16,003*** $16,326*** 2020 $5,554 $5,035 $6,905 2020 $2,345 $20,768*** $14,667*** 2019 $5,397 $7,221 $5,716 2019 $2,279 $19,454*** $4,488 2018 $5,235 $6,842 $3,322 2018 $2,267 $20,086*** $2,081 2017 $5,100 $3,198 $5,469 2017 $2,210 $8,386 $1,640 2016 $4,990 $2,899 $5,331 2016 $2,163 $506 $2,625 2015 $5,486 $5,171 $4,137 2015 $3,378 $1,834 $3,518 2014 $5,486 $5,363 $5,399 2014 $3,378 $1,924 $3,388 2013 $5,486 $4,014 $5,512 2013 $3,378 $1,381 $3,380 2012 $5,486 $4,014 $5,557 2012 $3,378 $1,253 $2,305 2011 $5,486 $4,014 $5,266 2011 $3,378 $2,172 $1,518 2010 $5,394 $3,832 $5,433 2010 $3,322 $2,114 $1,185 2009 $5,304 $4,017 $5,375 2009 $3,266 $1,733 $877 2008 $5,110 $3,883 $5,361 2008 $3,146 $1,647 $466 2007 $4,928 $3,018 $5,657 2007 $3,034 $856 $1,228 2006 $4,775 $3,393 $5,681 2006 $2,940 $895 $1,536 2005 $4,056 $2,868 $5,297 2005 $1,762 $905 $1,832 *Kent School District has for several years been utilizing an inflation-adjusted rate instead of a formula-driven rate. This year, for instance, the actual rate would have been $7,357 for single-family and $7,612 for multifamily. The maximum allowable fee this year is set at $10,044 for single-family dwelling units and a maximum of $10,234 for multifamily dwelling units.This number is updated annually to match the change in construction cost index in the Seattle area (which was 8.3% this year). 6.D.b Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Kent-Federal Way-Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fee Draft DATE: October 19, 2021 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Public Hearing on the Comprehensive Plan Amendement to Incorporate the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority 2022- 2027 Capital Improvement Plan into the Capital Facilities Element SUMMARY: This is the public hearing to incorporate the 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Plan adopted by the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority into the Comprehensive Plan Capital Facilities Element. Public input is welcome. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance - Comp Plan Amendment - PSRFA Capital Facilities Plan (PDF) 2. Exhibit to Ordinance (PDF) 6.E Packet Pg. 156 1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment— Capital Facilities Element and Six-Year Capital Improvement Plan for RFA ORDINANCE NO.________ AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the Kent Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities Element to include the Six-Year Capital Improvement Plan of the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority (CPA-2021-1). RECITALS A. Pursuant to RCW 82.02.050, impact fees may be collected and spent only for the public facilities which are addressed by the City’s Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. B. During the development permitting process, Fire Impact Fees are assessed and collected pursuant to Chapter 12.15 of the Kent City Code, and the amount of the fees are determined through the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority’s Six-Year Capital Improvement Plan. C. For the purpose of continuing to benefit from the City’s assessment of Fire Impact Fees, and to update the impact fee amounts, the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority submitted a proposed amendment to their Six-Year Capital Improvement Plan for the years 2022 through 2027 to be included in an amendment of the City’s Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. 6.E.a Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: Ordinance - Comp Plan Amendment - PSRFA Capital Facilities Plan (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment— Capital Facilities Element and Six-Year Capital Improvement Plan for RFA D. To assure that comprehensive plans remain relevant and up to date, the GMA allows amendments to the capital facilities element of comprehensive plans concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a city budget. RCW 36.70A.130(2)(a)(iv). E. The City of Kent has established procedures for amending its Comprehensive Plan in Chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code (KCC). KCC 12.02.010(A)(5) allows amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the City budget. In that circumstance, the City Council holds the public hearing on the Comprehensive Plan amendment rather than the Land Use and Planning Board. F. On October 6, 2021, the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Governance Board voted to adopt Resolution 178 approving the Puget Sound RFA 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Plan and Resolution 179 approving the Puget Sound RFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy. G. After providing appropriate public notice, the City Council of the City of Kent considered the requested Comprehensive Plan amendment and held a public hearing on October 19, 2021. H. On October 13, 2021, the City’s SEPA responsible official issued a SEPA Addendum to existing environmental documents consisting of the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan Review and Midway Subarea Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Draft and Final (ENV-2010-3) and the Downtown Subarea Action Plan Supplemental EIS Draft and Final (ENV-2012-30). The SEPA Addendum explained that the proposed amendment would not create unavoidable impacts beyond those 6.E.a Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Ordinance - Comp Plan Amendment - PSRFA Capital Facilities Plan (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound 3 Comprehensive Plan Amendment— Capital Facilities Element and Six-Year Capital Improvement Plan for RFA previously identified in the EIS. I. On September 16, 2021, the City provided the required 60-day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 to the Department of Commerce for the State of Washington of the City’s proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The 60-day notice period passed on November 15, 2021. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE SECTION 1. - Amendment. The Kent Comprehensive Plan, and its Capital Facilities Element, are amended to include the Six-Year Capital Improvement Plan of the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority for the years 2022 through 2027, as set forth in Exhibit “A” attached and incorporated by this reference. SECTION 2. – Fire Impact Fee Schedule. Pursuant to KCC 12.15.070 and 12.15.100, the updated Fire Impact Fee schedule provided in Attachment A to the Six-Year Capital Improvement Plan of the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority for years 2022-2027 is hereby adopted, and Fire Impact Fees shall be collected in accordance with Chapter 12.12 KCC. SECTION 3. – Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering; or references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations. 6.E.a Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Ordinance - Comp Plan Amendment - PSRFA Capital Facilities Plan (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound 4 Comprehensive Plan Amendment— Capital Facilities Element and Six-Year Capital Improvement Plan for RFA SECTION 4. – Severability. If any one or more section, subsection, or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, that decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5. – Effective Date. This ordinance will take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law. DANA RALPH, MAYOR Date Approved ATTEST: KIMBERLEY A. KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted Date Published APPROVED AS TO FORM: PAT FITZPATRICK, CITY ATTORNEY 6.E.a Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Ordinance - Comp Plan Amendment - PSRFA Capital Facilities Plan (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound PUGET SOUND REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Plan Six-Year Update to the 2014-2033 Capital Facilities & Equipment Plan EXHIBIT A 6.E.b Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) Intentionally left blank 6.E.b Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) i | Page PSRFA 2022 – 2027 Capital Improvement Plan Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority 2022-2027 Six-Year Update to the 2014-2033 Capital Facilities & Equipment Plan This Plan was prepared and implemented through the collaboration and work of the following leadership personnel, key staff members and their associates: Fire Chief Matthew Morris Assistant Chief Brian Carson Deputy Chief Mark Jones Division Chiefs Pat Pawlak-Facilities Sean Penwell-Business Information and Technology Services GIS Analyst Savanna Nagorski Planning Engineer Kelley Jensen Budget and Accounting Manager Lavina Brennecke Business Analyst Sameer Ahmed 6.E.b Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) ii | Page PSRFA 2022 – 2027 Capital Improvement Plan This plan has been implemented through the following Resolution and the Board Members Identified below. Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Governance Board Members City of Covington City of Kent City of Seatac KCFD#37 KCFD#43 (Advisory Member) (Advisory Member) (Advisory Member) Toni Troutner Allan Barrie Sean Smith Bill Boyce Erin Sitterly Margaret Harto Craig Hooper Les Thomas Jim Scott 6.E.b Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) iii | Page PSRFA 2022 – 2027 Capital Improvement Plan Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Background and Demographics .................................................................................................................. 2 2.1 SeaTac Service Area ......................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 King County Fire District #43 / Maple Valley Service Area ............................................ 3 3 Community Growth and Impacts of Growth 2022 – 2027 ............................................................... 4 3.1 Growth Remains Consistent with the 2014-2033 Master CFEP .................................... 5 4 PSF Service Level Performance ................................................................................................................... 6 4.1 Response Performance Findings ................................................................................................ 6 5 Capital Facilities ................................................................................................................................................ 8 5.1 Fixed Facilities.................................................................................................................................... 8 Fire Stations – Kent/District 37 Service Area......................................................... 8 Future Station Properties ............................................................................................... 9 Support Facilities ................................................................................................................ 9 6 2022-2027 Need for Capital Resources and Effects on Impact Fees ........................................ 11 6.1 Planned Capital Funding 2014 – 2033 .................................................................................. 11 Planned Capital Expenses 2022 – 2027 ................................................................. 11 6.2 Progress toward Planned Capital Purchases ...................................................................... 12 6.3 Capital Improvement Plan Effects on Impact Fees .......................................................... 12 6.4 Impact Fees Applied ..................................................................................................................... 12 ATTACHMENT A ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 6.E.b Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) Intentionally left blank 6.E.b Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 1 | Page PSRFA 2022 – 2027 Capital Improvement Plan 1 Executive Summary This Capital Improvement Plan (the "Plan") is a periodic 6-year update and extension of the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority (the “RFA”) 2014 – 2033 Master Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan (CFEP) in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act (GMA) Chapter 36.70A RCW, City of Kent Code 12.15.060, and Covington City Code Chapter 19.50 “Fire Impact Fees”. The funding plan as part of this report has been updated and balanced through 2027. The underlying premise of this document is as the community within the Puget Sound RFA service area continues to grow, additional resources will be required to adequately serve the growing demand for fire & life safety services. The goal of this Plan is to identify the next six years of community growth, determine the need for additional facilities, determine their cost and prioritize those resources into a 6-year funding plan (2022 – 2027) to ensure adequate service delivery prior to, or concurrently with, the impacts of development within the service area. This Plan update uses data available through 2021 to evaluate level of service performance and the progress toward implementation of the 2014 - 2033 CFEP. The RFA reviews and considers land use patterns and determinations provided by jurisdictions within Puget Sound Fire’s service area. The RFA uses historical growth data provided by the Office of Financial Management to determine current population estimates and projections to 2027. This approach is reliable for fire service planning since it looks toward actual growth. However, as data is available from the Puget Sound Regional Council and updated Comprehensive Plans are provided by the Cities of Kent and Covington, the RFA will reevaluate its approach to determine future growth. The greatest impacts for the RFA and its community in 2020-2021 are undoubtedly from the historic, worldwide COVID-19 pandemic. As cases of COVID increased within the community, the RFA reprioritized its resources and efforts and joined forces with other regional EMS agencies to help ensure a healthy and safe community. Emergency personal responded to sick residents and provided COVID testing and vaccinations, while the RFA also provided program administration, logistical solutions and staffing in the regional effort to overcome the pandemic. Consequently, the cost of goods and materials that the RFA depends on for construction, continued use, replacement and expansion have increased exponentially due to the pandemic. As a result, baseline impact fees have increased in line with updated 2021 costs associated with funding the capital resources required to maintain fire service concurrency. For purposes of this plan, capital improvements are defined as real estate, structures or collective equipment purchases anticipated to have a cost of $5,000 or more and an expected useful life of at least 3 years. The need for resources is best outlined in the Master CFEP, and the RFA’s Mitigation and Level of Service Policy (LOS Policy), of which Attachment A of this update amends Appendices A, B and C to demonstrate updated impact fees for 2022-2027. This document also includes an updated capacity analysis in Table 4 and 5 which show average daily resource availability. 6.E.b Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 2 | Page PSRFA 2022 – 2027 Capital Improvement Plan 2 Background and Demographics The Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority, also known as Puget Sound Fire (PSF), is an independent special purpose district legally formed under Chapter 52 of the Revised Code of Washington providing fire and rescue services to nearly 109 square miles of urban and rural area. Services provided are delivered 24 hours per day, 365 days per year through career firefighters and support staff. Services delivered by the RFA include fire suppression, fire prevention/code enforcement, fire investigations, emergency medical services (EMS), non-emergent medical services through the FD CARES program, hazardous materials response, specialized rescue services, emergency management services, and public education in fire prevention and life safety. The current service area includes the cities of Covington, Kent, Maple Valley and SeaTac, as well as unincorporated areas of King County within Fire Districts 37 and 43. Generally, the RFA’s service area borders Renton and Tukwila to the north, the Cascade foothills to the east, Auburn to the south and Burien, Des Moines and Federal Way to the west. Current 2021 population of the RFA service area is estimated at 234,541.1 This update utilizes the service standards adopted by Puget Sound Fire in its 2019 Standard of Cover (SOC). These standards are used to identify gaps in service compared to adopted standards and guide capital resource planning to help close this gap and sustain and/or improve current services while concurrently absorbing the service impacts of new development and community growth. The resources identified in this 6-year plan work toward implementing the deployment strategies identified in the RFA’s 2014 – 2035 Master CFEP, 2019 Standard of Cover and LOS Policy. Fire service capacity is evaluated upon the ability of current deployed resources to meet established levels of service. For example, a fire station with three apparatus bays and the infrastructure required to support three or more emergency response units has reserve capacity when only one or two units are staffed and deployed from that station. Additionally, a specific response resource that meets its level of service objectives and is reliably available for service at least as often as it is expected to meet its level of service objective, has reserve capacity. The RFA’s goal is to deliver service at adopted levels, nine times out of 10, or a service expectation that meets adopted standards 90% of the time. Fire service capacity is also measured with consideration of future growth and the fire service capacity that future growth will erode when built. This Plan identifies: • The current and projected demographics of the Puget Sound RFA service area. • The inventory of existing capital facilities. • The recent historical performance to the adopted standards. • The need for additional resources over the next six years. • The funding plan to implement the needed resources through 2027. 1 Washington State Office of Financial Management April 2021 with estimates of fire district 37’s unincorporated area based upon housing counts and 3 persons per dwelling 6.E.b Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 3 | Page PSRFA 2022 – 2027 Capital Improvement Plan 2.1 SeaTac Service Area The RFA provides fire-based services to the City of SeaTac through a contract for service that began January 1, 2014. SeaTac’s area covers approximately 10 square miles surrounding the Port of Seattle Airport and has a 2021 population of 29,890. Two fire stations owned by SeaTac are leased and operated by the RFA under the service contract. All other capital resources previously owned by SeaTac prior to 2014 have been transferred to the ownership of the RFA. As a condition of the service contract, SeaTac provides an annual capital payment to the RFA for funding the equipment that was transferred but has retained responsibility for the capital costs of fire stations. Consequently, this plan does not address capital fire station needs in the SeaTac service area. 2.2 King County Fire District #43 / Maple Valley Service Area PSF provides fire-based services to King County Fire District #43 (FD43) through a contract for service that began October 1, 2018. The FD43 area covers approximately 51 square miles and includes the City of Maple Valley, the areas of Hobart and Ravensdale, as well as a large unincorporated area of rural land. The 2021 population of the FD43 and Maple Valley area is 44,891 2. Six (6) fire stations are owned by FD43. Three stations are currently unstaffed volunteer stations that remain part of FD43. The other three stations are operated by the RFA under the service contract. Most other capital resources previously owned by Maple Valley prior to 2018 have been transferred to the ownership of the RFA. As a condition of the service contract, FD43 continues to fund fire stations and provides an annual capital payment to the RFA to assist funding other resource needs. 2 Based upon the Office of Financial Management and 2010 census housing occupancy counts in unincorporated areas. See also Table 2. 6.E.b Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 4 | Page PSRFA 2022 – 2027 Capital Improvement Plan 3 Community Growth and Impacts of Growth 2022 – 2027 In the post-Great Recession years from 2010 to 2016, Puget Sound Fire’s population grew at its slowest 6-year rate in more than 30 years. Despite the recession, population growth within the legacy (Kent & Fire District 37) service area grew on average 1.43% per year from 2011 to 2021 with Covington experiencing a slightly higher growth rate than Kent. Alternatively, the unincorporated areas grew by less than a half percent per year (See Table 2). Over the past five years (2016 – 2020) annual service demand grew in all urban areas as shown in Table 1 below. Some areas experienced a minor decline in incident count in 2020 due to reduced traffic volumes and other anomalies during the COVID pandemic. Table 1: Incident Growth - 2016 - 2020 5-Year Service Growth - Annual Incident Count Service Area 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 5 Yr. Growth Yearly Growth Covington 1,479 1,580 1,618 1,635 1,644 11% 2.23% Kent 17,586 17,719 17,844 18,244 17,720 1% 0.15% King Co Dist 37 435 507 498 511 516 19% 3.72% Maple Valley 1,474 1,559 1,508 1,572 1,561 6% 1.18% King Co Dist. 43 1,053 1,239 1,096 1,203 1,281 22% 4.33% SeaTac 4,425 4,612 4,658 4,840 4,690 6% 1.20% Total 26,452 27,216 27,222 28,005 27,412 4% 0.73% Table 2: Housing and Population Growth Projections3 Housing and Population Growth Projections Service Area 2021 Estimate 2027 Projection Housing Units Population Housing Units Population Covington 7,228 20,890 9,662 23,135 Kent 48,795 132,400 50,114 141,734 King Co Dist 37 2,230 6,560 2315 6,988 Maple Valley 9,648 27,570 11,438 30,803 King Co Dist. 43 Unincorporated 5,558 17,231 5,633 17,404 SeaTac 10,943 29,890 11,075 31,705 Total 84,402 234,541 90,237 251,769 3 Figures for 2021 are counts from the Office of Financial Management; 2027 is based upon an average growth rate from 10-year historic data provided by OFM. 6.E.b Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 5 | Page PSRFA 2022 – 2027 Capital Improvement Plan The Puget Sound Regional Council’s regional plan “Vision 2040,” identifies Kent as both a residential and commercial/industrial growth center, making it likely that growth rates in Kent will exceed the past 20-year rate of 1.35% per year. When PSRC releases their projected population rates, the RFA will reevaluate the service area growth rate methodology and projections. Looking forward, an additional unpopulated area of approximately 80 acres was annexed into the City of Covington in 2016, now known as the soon-be-developed 214-acre LakePoint Urban Village on the far east edge of the RFA’s service area, with an anticipated 1,500 housing units and over 850,000 SF of commercial space to be developed within the next six years. Table 3 below provides both a low and high range estimate of commercial growth. Continued growth at the 2013 to 2016 rate of 1.35% per year is the “Low” estimate for 2023 and 2035, and the “High” estimate uses a growth rate of 1.98% per year and more closely relates to market growth prior to the Great Recession and current growth rates. Both estimates are dependent upon buildable lands and future market rates. These rates do not include the LakePoint development in Covington, which will be assessed at time of development approval and completion. Table 3: Commercial Growth Rates 2015 & 2018 with estimates for 2023 & 2035 3.1 Growth Remains Consistent with the 2014-2033 Master CFEP The pattern of growth and estimates of future impacts on service demand remain consistent with the 2014 - 2033 Master Capital Facilities & Equipment Plan for the legacy Puget Sound Fire service area. As a result of this evaluation, the formula for projected new dwelling units and commercial square footage estimates used in calculating impact fees shown in Table 9 remain as used in previous versions. 2015 2018 Actual Actual Low Estimate High Estimate Low Estimate High Estimate 64,995 66,706 69,689 76,830 77,289 104,178 Commercial Growth Projections Square Feet in Thousands 2023 2035 6.E.b Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 6 | Page PSRFA 2022 – 2027 Capital Improvement Plan 4 PSF Service Level Performance 4.1 Response Performance Findings Reliability is typically used as an indicator to monitor the need for additional resources. Reliability at or above 95% indicates reserve capacity. This is shown in Table 4 below as “Green.” As reliability falls below 95% (displayed as light green to yellow) it is time to begin planning for the deployment of additional resources to handle the increasing workload. Reliability below 90% (displayed as red) prevents achievement of response standards. Stations with reliability displayed in red have high unit hour utilization and are considered in resource exhaustion at those times. Resource exhaustion begins to impact surrounding fire station response units. As neighboring response units are drawn in to cover for areas in resource exhaustion, a ripple effect spreads outward with the consequence of longer response times as units must travel out of their home area to cover the deficient area. This ripple continues to spread during peak demand hours moving out to other fire stations and often to other jurisdictions. Station 71 reliability improved from 2018 to 2019. The improvement is due to deployment and staffing of an additional aid car (A370) beginning in 2019. This illustrates how system improvements can impact the communities PSF serves. Table 4: Resource Exhausted Stations in 2018 - 2020 Puget Sound RFA - Resource Exhausted Stations Station SeaTac - Station 45 Kent-West - Station 73 Kent-Central - Station 71 Kent-East - Station 77 Year 2018 2019 2020 2018 2019 2020 2018 2019 2020 2018 2019 2020 Hour 00:00 95.83% 95.32% 94.33% 95.55% 94.56% 95.78% 95.10% 96.59% 96.20% 95.40% 94.99% 94.38% 01:00 94.08% 94.23% 95.52% 95.02% 96.06% 94.07% 95.09% 96.28% 97.06% 95.08% 95.37% 95.59% 02:00 95.12% 94.70% 96.73% 95.68% 95.71% 93.45% 95.37% 96.39% 96.48% 95.02% 96.82% 96.17% 03:00 94.67% 95.73% 95.89% 95.17% 94.96% 95.68% 95.86% 96.64% 96.84% 95.05% 97.43% 94.80% 04:00 96.48% 96.48% 95.67% 95.99% 96.37% 96.09% 96.58% 97.26% 97.42% 96.02% 97.17% 96.00% 05:00 96.33% 95.31% 94.38% 95.34% 94.27% 94.64% 95.88% 96.88% 96.80% 95.50% 96.44% 96.32% 06:00 93.71% 93.50% 95.48% 94.41% 94.14% 95.08% 94.23% 95.50% 96.57% 95.94% 96.75% 96.07% 07:00 93.86% 92.35% 93.22% 93.08% 94.66% 95.82% 92.70% 95.37% 95.75% 96.06% 96.83% 93.91% 08:00 91.41% 91.97% 92.21% 93.56% 94.24% 92.62% 91.05% 94.76% 95.47% 94.68% 94.84% 92.75% 09:00 92.70% 87.83% 93.06% 92.21% 92.55% 92.46% 91.77% 94.52% 94.46% 94.35% 93.27% 92.04% 10:00 90.48% 88.47% 91.53% 92.21% 92.15% 92.68% 91.14% 94.07% 93.20% 95.11% 94.00% 92.06% 11:00 90.07% 89.60% 91.40% 89.89% 91.10% 93.19% 91.56% 93.62% 93.47% 89.85% 91.58% 92.74% 12:00 89.50% 89.08% 91.35% 90.87% 90.74% 91.63% 90.58% 93.18% 93.69% 90.88% 92.07% 92.82% 13:00 88.85% 89.69% 91.73% 93.05% 91.27% 87.60% 90.61% 93.20% 93.03% 91.11% 90.72% 93.07% 14:00 89.17% 89.10% 90.50% 91.01% 91.45% 88.23% 91.36% 92.71% 92.74% 92.68% 91.86% 93.26% 15:00 89.53% 90.12% 87.46% 91.91% 90.63% 89.89% 89.87% 92.31% 92.59% 90.30% 91.31% 92.56% 16:00 87.73% 90.01% 87.90% 89.92% 90.65% 88.07% 89.13% 92.04% 91.97% 90.26% 91.83% 92.64% 17:00 87.65% 86.84% 89.11% 89.61% 91.14% 90.74% 88.15% 93.39% 93.06% 91.54% 91.02% 90.02% 18:00 86.52% 88.03% 88.60% 89.34% 91.16% 89.65% 89.15% 92.74% 92.59% 91.88% 91.79% 91.92% 19:00 91.26% 90.56% 87.43% 90.49% 91.59% 89.57% 90.22% 93.04% 93.65% 93.05% 94.67% 91.09% 20:00 90.92% 91.52% 91.01% 92.05% 91.50% 92.18% 91.41% 94.60% 93.71% 92.83% 94.53% 91.85% 21:00 90.92% 91.52% 91.01% 92.05% 91.50% 92.18% 91.41% 94.60% 93.71% 92.83% 94.53% 91.85% 22:00 92.47% 92.95% 92.99% 92.25% 95.29% 93.88% 93.95% 95.27% 94.84% 93.14% 94.59% 92.74% 23:00 96.21% 96.09% 95.41% 97.37% 96.23% 96.71% 95.72% 97.70% 97.14% 95.64% 96.04% 97.05% Daily Avg. 91.90% 91.71% 92.25% 92.84% 93.08% 92.58% 92.41% 94.69% 94.68% 93.51% 94.19% 93.49% 6.E.b Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 7 | Page PSRFA 2022 – 2027 Capital Improvement Plan Table 5: Hourly Area Station Reliability for 2018 – 2020 YearAreaSeaTacKentCovingtonMaple ValleySystem WideSeaTacKentCovingtonMaple ValleySystem WideSeaTacKentCovingtonMaple ValleySystem WideHour00:0095.99%96.04%97.67%98.09%96.70%96.01%95.91%97.27%97.61%96.52%94.94%96.18%97.09%97.75%96.45%01:0095.88%95.97%97.57%97.95%96.60%95.56%96.41%97.32%97.97%96.72%95.46%96.28%96.87%97.78%96.55%02:0095.87%96.20%97.50%98.06%96.71%96.06%96.59%96.71%98.07%96.84%96.43%95.96%96.76%97.48%96.58%03:0096.03%96.42%97.61%98.01%96.85%96.84%96.46%97.19%98.08%97.03%96.38%96.31%97.12%97.84%96.83%04:0096.96%96.52%97.23%98.61%97.16%96.47%97.19%97.63%98.31%97.35%96.35%97.03%97.65%98.37%97.29%05:0096.72%96.12%97.44%98.03%96.85%96.18%96.50%97.04%97.66%96.76%95.55%96.58%96.95%97.69%96.68%06:0095.23%95.28%97.78%97.53%96.11%94.83%96.09%96.80%97.49%96.31%96.08%96.59%96.57%97.39%96.70%07:0095.18%94.44%96.44%97.28%95.49%94.26%95.46%94.97%96.80%95.45%95.17%95.62%96.16%97.36%96.02%08:0093.01%93.93%95.80%96.61%94.57%93.93%94.87%93.93%97.11%95.07%94.11%94.18%94.70%96.40%94.77%09:0092.85%93.48%95.11%96.12%94.14%91.93%94.22%95.32%96.44%94.39%93.76%94.05%94.03%95.96%94.42%10:0092.11%93.13%93.76%95.18%93.44%91.63%93.53%94.55%96.02%93.84%92.11%93.39%94.53%95.69%93.84%11:0092.19%92.13%94.34%95.32%93.14%91.65%92.89%94.29%94.80%93.30%92.39%93.22%93.91%95.82%93.79%12:0091.39%92.27%93.52%95.77%93.01%91.35%93.18%94.44%95.16%93.39%91.94%92.98%93.51%94.95%93.29%13:0092.31%92.61%94.53%95.76%93.49%91.71%92.92%95.45%95.57%93.62%92.14%92.35%92.33%95.22%93.06%14:0091.03%92.31%93.14%94.74%92.67%92.40%93.01%95.16%94.66%93.60%92.16%91.98%92.62%94.66%92.82%15:0091.61%91.63%94.17%95.16%92.74%91.76%92.28%92.89%94.81%92.84%91.17%92.66%94.18%95.80%93.31%16:0091.38%91.27%94.26%95.22%92.57%91.10%93.00%92.60%95.48%93.15%91.28%91.64%92.91%94.63%92.47%17:0090.63%91.25%94.00%95.25%92.36%90.08%92.92%92.90%94.55%92.67%91.79%91.94%92.00%94.86%92.61%18:0089.71%91.89%93.83%95.75%92.53%90.24%92.79%94.22%95.46%93.11%91.39%92.07%93.14%94.68%92.74%19:0092.93%92.45%94.12%96.20%93.60%91.94%93.68%94.53%96.22%94.02%90.06%92.44%93.43%95.10%92.70%20:0092.27%93.25%94.90%96.30%93.93%93.48%94.58%94.96%96.32%94.83%92.58%93.31%95.12%95.98%94.07%21:0092.27%93.25%94.90%96.30%93.93%93.48%94.58%94.96%96.32%94.83%92.58%93.31%95.12%95.98%94.07%22:0094.06%94.16%95.75%97.16%95.01%94.02%95.66%95.66%97.34%95.72%93.71%94.24%95.58%96.25%94.83%23:0096.69%96.57%97.21%98.35%97.07%96.87%96.92%97.63%98.57%97.38%97.29%96.91%97.83%97.77%97.32%Daily Avg.93.51%93.86%95.52%96.61%94.61%93.49%94.65%95.35%96.53%94.95%93.62%94.22%95.00%96.31%94.72%201820192020Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Area Station Reliability6.E.b Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 8 | Page PSRFA 2022 – 2027 Capital Improvement Plan 5 Capital Facilities PSF capital resources consist of fire stations and facilities, fire apparatus (vehicles used for fire and rescue work), staff vehicles and related equipment, tools and personal protection equipment needed to provide fire and rescue services safely and legally. 5.1 Fixed Facilities Fire Stations – Kent/District 37 Service Area Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority owns and maintains eight fire stations (Stations 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, and 78) located throughout the service area (not including Maple Valley or SeaTac) as identified in Table 6 and the map in Figure 1 shown below. The average fire station is over 30 years old with the capacity for three emergency response apparatus. Currently, only stations 71 and 74 maintain more than one front line response apparatus with minimum staffing levels. Seven of eight stations have some reserve capacity in the form of apparatus bays and dorm rooms. However, to utilize this capacity, additional climate-controlled space is required to house reserve apparatus, alternative response vehicles, and other associated equipment that is currently stored in existing apparatus bays. Table 6: Facility / Station Inventory – Existing Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Stations Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Stations Facility Location Property Acres Building SF Age (Average) Acquired Condition Kent and District 37 Fire Stations-All owned and/or maintained by PSF Station 71 504 West Crow St 1.05 10,858 57 2010 Fair Station 72 25620 140th Ave SE 0.91 7,772 39 2010 Fair Station 73 26512 Military Road S 4.69 13,000 31 2010 Good Station 74 24611 116th Ave SE 8.66 26,653 31 Lease 2010 Good Station 75 15635 SE 272nd St 4.18 12,425 31 Lease 2010 Good Station 76 20676 72nd Ave S 2.80 13,104 32 2010 Good Station 77 20717 132nd Ave SE 1.98 15,900 20 2010 Good Station 78 17820 SE 256th St 3.10 17,685 12 2010 Good Sub-Total 27.37 117,397 32 SeaTac Fire Stations-All owned or maintained by City of SeaTac Station 45 3011 S 200th St 0.81 6,766 6 Lease 2015 Good Station 46 3521 S 170th St 1.23 24,600 12 Lease 2014 Good Sub-Total 2.04 31,366 9 Maple Valley Fire Stations and Facilities-All owned by District 43, maintained by PSF under contract Career Stations-Staffed and operated by PSF under contract Station 80 23775 SE 264th St 0.87 8,985 20 N/A Fair Station 81 22225 SE 231st St 1.78 10,821 34 N/A Fair Station 83 27250 216th Ave SE 0.91 2,852 56 N/A Fair Sub-Total 3.56 22,658 36 Volunteer Stations-Staffed and operated by District 43 Volunteers Station 82 27519 SE Kent Kangley Rd 1.49 2,656 39 N/A Fair Station 84 16855 194th Ave SE 0.42 3,000 56 N/A Fair Station 85 27605 SE 208th St 4.32 2,112 38 N/A Low Sub-Total 6.23 7,768 44 Total 39.20 179,189 32 6.E.b Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 9 | Page PSRFA 2022 – 2027 Capital Improvement Plan Future Station Properties Puget Sound RFA currently owns two undeveloped properties within the City of Kent that will both house new fire stations (proposed stations 70 and 79). Station 70 is currently in the design phase. Additional land acquisition is required to continue Station 79 development. District 43 owns an unincorporated, undeveloped property within the Atkinson neighborhood as a potential new station site. Table 7: Facility / Station Inventory – Existing PSRFA Property for Future Station Development Puget Sound RFA Property Inventory for Future Stations Facility Location Property Acres Acquired Condition Future Fire Station Sites Owned by PSF Benson Station (79) 21600 108th Ave SE 0.29 2010 Land Valley Station (70) 407 Washington Ave S 1.23 2008 Land Sub-Total 1.52 Future Fire Station Sites Owned by District 43 Hobart Station (86) 24416 SE 216th St 4.32 2006 Land Sub-Total 4.32 Total 5.84 Land Support Facilities Support facilities include space for emergency management functions, training, apparatus & vehicle maintenance, facilities maintenance, planning, information technology, CARES, logistics, and a roadway. An inventory of these facilities is found in Table 8 below. Table 8: Facility / Station Inventory – Existing Puget Sound RFA Support Facilities Puget Sound RFA Support Facility Inventory Facility Location Property Acres Building SF Age (Average) Acquired Condition Accessory Structures Owned, Maintained or Funded by PSF Hose Tower 504 West Crow St Station 71 300 50 2010 Fair PSRFA Headquarters 24611 / 24523 116th Ave Station 74 Police/Fire Training Center 3,920 31 Drill Tower 4,652 31 Lease 2010 Good Recruit Classroom 1,152 16 2005 Good Facilities Workshop 15635 SE 272nd St Station 75 Fire Garage 20678 72nd Ave S Station 76 10,865 32 2010 Good Academy Instructor Office 24425 116th Ave SE 0.23 2,860 58 2010 Good Office Annex 20811 84th Ave S 5.82 78,320 53 2012 Good Finance/EMS Suite 110 B.I.T.S. Suite 112 & 114 Wellness Center Suite 116 King County E-911 Suite 103 & 105 SKCFTC/KCM1 Suite 102 & 106 SKCFTC Classroom Suite 108 SKCFTC Multi Purpose Room Suite 111 Logistics 8320 S 208th St, N/A 24,000 55 2013 Good Community Risk Reduction 400 West Gowe St, N/A 5,000 40 2000 Good District 43 Fire Garage (St 81) 22225 SE 231st St N/A 2,000 34 N/A Low Total 6.05 133,069 39 6.E.b Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 10 | Page PSRFA 2022 – 2027 Capital Improvement Plan Figure 1: PSF Service Area Map 6.E.b Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 11 | Page PSRFA 2022 – 2027 Capital Improvement Plan 6 2022-2027 Need for Capital Resources and Effects on Impact Fees Resource exhaustion to PSF’s response standards occurs daily in most areas of Kent and some areas of Covington and SeaTac. As growth occurs, future reliability is expected to continue its decline. This will lead to steadily increasing response times unless strategies for additional resources and the staffing they require can be funded and deployed. 6.1 Planned Capital Funding 2014 – 2033 The 2014 – 2033 PSRFA Master Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan identified the need for more than $87 million in capital investments to maintain fire service concurrency through 2033. However, escalating construction costs and inflationary increases have outpaced those savings and increased the overall capital funding need. The current cost of the total 2014 Master Plan has increased from $87.14 million in 2014 to $114.7 million in 2021. The largest portion of this increase comes from hard construction costs for needed fire stations and the effects of inflation. Planned Capital Expenses 2022 – 2027 Table 9 identifies the capital expenses to be incurred between 2022 and 2027 based upon current priorities and levels of service. This table will be updated to reflect current priorities and level of service needs as an accompaniment to each 6-Year CIP update. Table 9: Six Year (2022-2027) Capital Expenses and Revenues 6 - Year Cost/Funding Sources for Capital Needs Costs in thousands based on 2021 dollars Cost/Funding Source 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Totals Expense Sources Station Construction & Land Purchase $1,262 $1,000 $2,000 $5,750 $5,000 $5,000 $20,012 Apparatus $2,883 $2,951 $1,200 $0 $440 $2,715 $10,189 Equipment $529 $466 $306 $351 $291 $291 $2,234 Asset Preservation $106 $182 $50 $50 $50 $50 $488 I.T. Capital $1,012 $806 $698 $610 $605 $610 $4,341 72nd Ave S Extension and Benson Station Debt $472 $172 $172 $1,674 $2,490 Revenue Sources Annual Revenue to Capital $2,055 $2,108 $645 $4,860 $2,728 $4,924 $17,320 Sale of Surplus Property/Equipment $98 $50 $284 $0 $0 $0 $432 Covington Impact/LOS Fees $1,056 $1,098 $1,142 $1,187 $1,235 $1,285 $7,003 Kent Impact Fees $2,280 $2,313 $2,346 $2,379 $2,414 $2,448 $14,180 King County Radio Program $767 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $767 Apparatus Shop Overhead Fees $8 $8 $9 $9 $9 $9 $52 Summary of revenue less expenses Expense $6,264 $5,577 $4,426 $8,435 $6,386 $8,666 $39,754 Revenue $6,264 $5,577 $4,426 $8,435 $6,386 $8,666 $39,754 Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 6.E.b Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 12 | Page PSRFA 2022 – 2027 Capital Improvement Plan 6.2 Progress toward Planned Capital Purchases As a result of the Great Recession and the uncertainty of the economy during that time, PSF delayed some planned equipment purchases between 2014 and 2016 and placed funding toward the new Valley and Benson stations on hold. In 2018, an additional property was purchased for the Benson Station and The Valley Station is now scheduled for completion in 2025. The Benson station is projected to be operational in 2028. All asset preservation projects, equipment needs, and apparatus are now scheduled for funding and replacement through 2027. 6.3 Capital Improvement Plan Effects on Impact Fees Impact fees are established in the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Mitigation and Level of Service Policy in Appendix A, using a formula based upon the cost of capital needs and service demand by property type. An addendum to the Policy’s Appendices A, B and C is included in this CIP update as Attachment A. Total funding needs have increased in this update resulting in a slight increase (less than 13% for new residential development since 2018, which is less than the projected CPI increase from 2017-2022) in impact fees displayed in Appendix A. The formula has also been updated to reflect more recent response data. 6.4 Impact Fees Applied Fire Impact fees have been collected as part of the Master Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan in the Cities of Kent and Covington for the benefit of the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority community since 2014. Since 2014, PSF has utilized over $1.2M in impact fees to fund capital purchases that enhances the health and safety of the community. Collected Impact Fees/LOS fees have been allocated to: • Asset Preservation • Apparatus purchase • Capital Equipment purchases • 72nd Ave S. Extension • Land acquisition for new Fire Station sites 6.E.b Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) ATTACHMENT A APPENDIX A LEVEL OF SERVICE & IMPACT FEE FORMULAS LOS Formula Calculation Land Use Type System wide C&E Res/Com Split Usage Factor ERF Factor New Dev Share Projected New Units 2014 - 2035 Impact Fee Residential Single-Family $114,707,712 60% 54% 1.13 80% 16,884 Units $1,989.90 / Unit Multi-Family 46% 1.4 $2,100.12 Commercial Commercia/Industrial $114,707,712 40% 23% 2.75 85% 12,500,000 SF $1.97 / SF Hospital/Medical Clinic/ Civic/School/Church 26% 2 95% $1.81 Senior Living/Assisted Care 21% 3 95% $2.20 Service - Hotel/Restaurant/Etc 20% 2 95% $1.39 LOS Formula Definitions • Land Use Type: Land use types and structure uses that impact fees are assessed on. • System wide C&E: The construction and equipment costs for the 20-year time span of the Puget Sound RFA’s Master Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan. This cost is updated based on a combination of updated 6-year capital need changes and consumer price index (CPI) increases. • Res/Com Split: Percentage of annual emergency responses by property type; Residential = 60%, Commercial = 40%. • Usage Factor: The portion of Res/Com Split that emergency response resources are used by a specific property type. • ERF Factor: The ERF or effective response force factor represents the size of the first alarm emergency response in numbers of firefighters and equipment that is needed to effectively handle the risk posed by that property type. • New Dev Share: Represents the portion of C&E costs assigned to new development. The remaining portion is to be paid for by the RFA through annual tax collections. • Projected New Units: Defines the number of new units projected to be constructed within Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority service area between 2014 and 2035. • Impact Fee Amount: Represents the maximum fee to be paid by new development for each specific property type. This fee amount may be reduced by 30% for single-family homes only if an automatic sprinkler system is installed voluntarily. 6.E.b Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) Project Permit # _______________ APPENDIX B Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Impact Fee Calculation for New Residential Development Date of Analysis: ______________________ Project Address: __________________________________________ Project City: _______________________________ Land Parcel # __________________________________________ Impact Fee category (check one) and rate: Single-Family _______ Impact fee rate: $1,989.90/ Unit Multi-Family _______ Impact fee rate: $2,100.12 / Unit Optional Fee Credit for Single-Family Only: Sprinklers installed voluntarily (circle one): YES: 30% NO: 0% Total Fee Calculation: Impact Fee Rate = ______________ Residential units in development x ______________ Total impact fee amount $ ______________ New Residential Impact Fee to be assessed: Total impact fee amount $ ______________ – optional fee credit for SFR ______% = $______________ Use for Multi-Family Only Multi-Family Common Space Calculation: Total Common Space in development ______________SF – Credit for Residential units in development (# _________ units x 50 SF) Common Space area to be assessed = ______________SF Commercial/Industrial Impact fee rate: x $1.97 /SF Common Space Impact Fee amount $ ______________ Total New Multi-Family Impact Fee to be assessed: New Residential IF amount $ ______________ + Common Space IF amount $ ______________ = $______________ 6.E.b Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) Project Permit # _______________ APPENDIX C Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Impact Fee Calculation for New Commercial Development Date of Analysis: ______________________ Project Address: __________________________________________ Project City: _______________________________ Land Parcel # __________________________________________ Impact fee category and rate: Commercial/Industrial ______ Impact fee rate: $1.97/ SF Hospital/Medical/Civic/ School/Church ______ Impact fee rate: $1.81 / SF Senior Living/Assisted Care ______ Impact fee rate: $2.20 / SF Service–Hotel/Restaurant/Etc. ______ Impact fee rate: $1.39 / SF Total fee calculation: Impact fee rate = _____________ Square footage of development x _____________ Impact fee to be assessed: Total impact fee amount = $____________ 6.E.b Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) Blessing of the Fire Engines New Engine 77 (above) and New Engine 47 (below) Blessed and placed into service October 13, 2019 6.E.b Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY Mitigation and Level of Service Policy for Fire Service Concurrency Updated October 6, 2021 6.E.b Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) Intentionally left blank 6.E.b Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) i | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Mitigation and Level of Service Policy This document was prepared and implemented through the collaboration and work of the following leadership personnel, key staff members and their associates: Fire Chief Matthew Morris Assistant Chief Brian Carson Deputy Chief Mark Jones Division Chiefs Pat Pawlak – Facilities Sean Penwell – Business Information and Technology Services GIS Analyst Savanna Nagorski 6.E.b Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) ii | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy This plan has been implemented through the following Resolution and the Board Members identified below: 6.E.b Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) iii | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Governance Board Members City of Covington City of Kent City of Seatac KCFD#37 KCFD#43 (Advisory Member) (Advisory Member) (Advisory Member) Toni Troutner Allan Barrie Sean Smith Bill Boyce Erin Sitterly Margaret Harto Craig Hooper Les Thomas Jim Scott 6.E.b Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) iv | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy This policy has been designed with two distinct purposes in mind, first to inform the lay reader regarding issues critical to maintaining fire service concurrency and second, to provide guidance to Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority’s staff in implementing mitigations necessary for maintaining fire service concurrency within the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority service area. The basis for impact and level of service contribution fees is derived from the revenues needed to maintain fire service concurrency and are identified in Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority’s 2014–2033 Master Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan. NEW DEVELOPMENT IN COVINGTON, SEATAC, AND KENT 6.E.b Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) v | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy Table of Contents 1.1. Accreditation: ........................................................................................................ 1 1.2. Accredited Agency: ............................................................................................... 1 1.3. Adopted: ................................................................................................................. 1 1.4. Alarm: ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.5. Alarm Processing Time: ........................................................................................ 1 1.6. Authority Having Jurisdiction: ............................................................................. 1 1.7. Apparatus: ............................................................................................................. 1 1.8. Call Stacking/Cascading Failure: ......................................................................... 1 1.9. Chief: Refers to the Fire Chief of Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority. .......... 1 1.10. Concentration: ....................................................................................................... 1 1.11. Concurrency: ......................................................................................................... 2 1.12. Deployment: .......................................................................................................... 2 1.13. Dispatch Time: See Section 6.2 ............................................................................ 2 1.14. Distribution: .......................................................................................................... 2 1.15. Drive Time: ............................................................................................................ 2 1.16. Effective Response Force: .................................................................................... 2 1.17. F-Box/Fire Box: ..................................................................................................... 2 1.18. Fire Flow ................................................................................................................ 2 1.19. Fire Impact Fee: ..................................................................................................... 2 1.20. Fire Level of Service Fee: ...................................................................................... 3 1.21. Fire Service Concurrency: .................................................................................... 3 1.22. First Due: See First-in (1.24) .............................................................................. 3 1.23. First Due Area:....................................................................................................... 3 1.24. First-in: .................................................................................................................. 3 1.25. Fractile Performance: ........................................................................................... 3 1.26. First Full Alarm: .................................................................................................... 3 1.27. Impact: ................................................................................................................... 3 1.28. Level of Service: .................................................................................................... 3 1.29. NFPA Standards: ................................................................................................... 3 1.30. Reliability: .............................................................................................................. 4 1.31. Resource Exhaustion: ........................................................................................... 4 1.32. Response ................................................................................................................ 4 6.E.b Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) vi | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 1.33. Response District: ................................................................................................. 4 1.34. Risk: ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.35. Standard(s) of Cover: ............................................................................................ 4 1.36. Total Response Time ............................................................................................ 5 2. Policy Statement .......................................................................................................... 6 3. Purpose Statement ...................................................................................................... 7 4. Consistency with other Plans and Policies ................................................................ 7 5. Primary Responsibility of Puget Sound Fire ............................................................. 7 6.1 Time and Emergencies.................................................................................................. 7 6.2 Measured Components of Emergency Response ....................................................... 8 6.3 Flashover........................................................................................................................ 9 6.4 Brain Death in a Non-Breathing Patient .................................................................... 12 7.1 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 1710 ................................. 14 7.2 Center for Public Safety Excellence (CPSE) Standard of Cover ............................... 15 8.1 Washington State Law ................................................................................................ 19 8.2. King County Standards .............................................................................................. 19 8.3. City of Covington and Kent Response Standards ..................................................... 19 8.4. Fire District 43 (Maple Valley Fire & Life Safety) City of SeaTac ........................... 19 10.1 Substandard performance ........................................................................................ 24 11.1. Concepts of Fire Service Capacity and Cascading Failure: .................................... 25 11.2 Components of Response: ........................................................................................ 27 11.5. Mitigation Options: Residential, Commercial and Regional Commercial ............ 28 12.1. Developer agreements ............................................................................................. 30 12.2. Basis for Calculating Impact and Level of Service Fees (Appendix A): ................ 30 13.1.1. Impact Fees & Mitigations .................................................................................... 32 13.1.3. Impact and Level of Service Fee Reduction: ....................................................... 32 13.1.4. Determination of fee – Adjustments – Exception – Appeals .............................. 33 13.1.5. Fee Collection Policy ............................................................................................. 34 13.1.6. Multi-Family common space credit ..................................................................... 34 13.1.7. Fee Exempt Properties ......................................................................................... 35 13.1.8. Agreements ............................................................................................................ 36 14.1. PSF Funding Participation: ...................................................................................... 37 15.1. The safety and welfare of current and future residents ....................................... 38 15.2. It is not the intent of this policy to limit PSF’s staff ............................................... 38 6.E.b Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) vii | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy Table of Figures: Figure 1: Flashover ....................................................................................................................... 9 Figure 2: Time vs. Products of Combustion .............................................................................. 11 Figure 3: Cardiac Survival Rate ................................................................................................. 12 Figure 4: Cardiac Survival with CPR and Defibrillation .......................................................... 13 Figure 5: NFPA’s Total Response Time Standards (minutes & seconds) ............................... 14 Figure 6: PSFA First Unit Arrival Service Standard-Urban Areas ........................................... 20 Figure 7: PSFA First Unit Arrival Service Standard-Rural Areas ............................................. 21 Figure 8: PSFA Minimum Effective Response Force Standard ................................................ 21 Figure 9: PSFA Full First Alarm Response Force Standard ...................................................... 22 Figure 10: PSF Reliability Objectives ......................................................................................... 23 Figure 11: Reliability Charts ....................................................................................................... 26 Acronyms ALS: Advanced Life Support BLS: Basic Life Support C&E: Capital and Equipment CFAI: Commission on Fire Accreditation International CPSE: Center for Public Safety Excellence EMS: Emergency Medical Services ERF: Effective Response Force GPM: Gallons Per Minute (relates to fire flow) IAFC: International Association of Fire Chiefs ICMA: International City/County Management Association ISO: Insurance Services Office PSF: Puget Sound Fire Authority LOS: Level of Service MERF: Minimum Effective Response Force NFPA: National Fire Protection Association PSAP: Public Safety Answering Point RCW: Revised Code of Washington SEPA: State Environmental Protection Act SOC: Standard of Cover 6.E.b Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 1 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 1. Definitions 1.1. Accreditation: Refers to the process of obtaining certification of competency and credibility under the guidelines established by the Center for Public Safety Excellence (CPSE). 1.2. Accredited Agency: Refers to a fire agency that has undergone an independent, peer review and been recommended for Accredited Agency Status by a team of assessors certified by the Center for Public Safety Excellence. Then, because of that review, their case is presented to CPSE’s Accreditation Commission, and if found credible by a vote of the Commission, are awarded Accredited Agency status. 1.3. Adopted: Refers to the formal action taken by a governing body to accept and put into effect an idea, method, or course of action. 1.4. Alarm: A signal or message from a person or system indicating the existence of an emergency or other situation requiring an action by an emergency response agency. 1.5. Alarm Processing Time: See Section 6.2. 1.6. Authority Having Jurisdiction: Refers to the municipal entity having jurisdiction for the enforcement of land-use and related building codes. 1.7. Apparatus: Refers to various specialized vehicles such as fire engines, fire trucks, ambulances, etc. that firefighters utilize during emergency responses. 1.8. Call Stacking/Cascading Failure: Refers to the occurrence of simultaneous emergency calls. Call stacking occurs when more than one request for emergency assistance occurs within the same fire station service area. When this occurs, the primary response unit cannot answer the second emergency and a second fire unit from the same station must respond or, a fire unit from a fire station farther away responds. See 1.27 – Reliability 1.9. Chief: Refers to the Fire Chief of Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority. 1.10. Concentration: Refers to the deployment or spacing of multiple fire and rescue resources from within a fire service jurisdiction so that the proper number of resources needed for an effective response force for all types of emergency incidents can arrive at the scene of an emergency within the defined level of service time. 6.E.b Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 2 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 1.11. Concurrency: Concurrency refers to the twelfth goal of the Washington State Growth Management Act 1 which requires public facilities and services necessary for public safety to be adequate to serve new development without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards. WAC 365-196-210(7) "Concurrency" means that adequate public facilities are available when the impacts of development occur, or within a specified time thereafter. 1.12. Deployment: The strategic assignment and placement of fire agency resources such as fire and EMS companies, fire stations and specific staffing levels for those companies to mitigate community emergency events. 1.13. Dispatch Time: See Section 6.2 1.14. Distribution: The deployment or “distribution” of fire stations and resources across a fire service jurisdiction so that the adopted first-in drive time standard for fire and rescue resources can be achieved. 1.15. Drive Time: The elapsed time needed for an emergency vehicle to travel to a dispatched address. Drive time begins when the wheels of a fire apparatus begin to roll in response to a dispatch and ends when the apparatus is parked at the scene of the dispatched address. 1.16. Effective Response Force: Refers to the number of resources and personnel needed to effectively provide fire or emergency medical services capable of mitigating the known risk(s) in the community. The number of resources making up an effective response force varies by type of emergency and level of risk. 1.17. F-Box/Fire Box: A geographic area usually a quarter section of land (1/4 - mile square) that is used to define the types, numbers and locations of fire and rescue resources to be dispatched to an emergency. See 1.30 – Response District. 1.18. Fire Flow: The quantity of water available for fire protection purposes more than that required for other purposes. 1.19. Fire Impact Fee: A fee authorized under Chapter 82.02 RCW that is assessed on new development to pay a proportionate share of the costs associated with maintaining fire service concurrency. Fire Impact fees must be adopted and authorized by the local land use authority. 1 Found in RCW 36.70A.020 and defined in WAC 365-196-210(7) 6.E.b Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 3 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 1.20. Fire Level of Service Fee: A fee that is used to mitigate the direct impacts new development has upon fire services inside of a jurisdiction that has not adopted fire impact fees. Fire level of service fees are consistent with the Growth Management Act and applied through the SEPA process or in cooperation with the authority having permitting jurisdiction under RCW 54.18.110 and 82.02.020. 1.21. Fire Service Concurrency: See 1.9 – Concurrency. 1.22. First Due: See First-in (1.24) 1.23. First Due Area: The response area of a jurisdiction that has been assigned to a specific fire station and its emergency response units, generally because of its ability to arrive at the scene of an emergency first compared to other areas of the jurisdiction. 1.24. First-in: Refers to the first fire and rescue apparatus to arrive at the scene of an emergency. Distribution performance is a measure of first-in drive time. 1.25. Fractile Performance: Refers to the percentile of time a specified performance expectation is achieved. If an emergency response drive time of 5 minutes is the standard, and it is achieved on 82 of 100 responses, the fractile or percentile performance would be 82%. 1.26. First Full Alarm: Refers to the number of fire resources and personnel assigned to a specific alarm type that can assemble an effective response force to mitigate the alarm. 1.27. Impact: Refers to the drain on the capacity of emergency response resources and their ability to maintain levels of service standards. 1.28. Level of Service: Level of service (LOS) refers to PSF’s adopted response time and performance expectations. Level of service expectations are established in PSF’s Standards of Cover document. 1.29. NFPA Standards: Codes, standards, recommended practices, and guides developed by the National Fire Protection Association through a consensus development process of the American National Standards Institute for fire protection agencies. 6.E.b Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 4 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 1.30. Reliability: Refers to the use of fire resource capacity. For a resource to be reliable, it must be available to answer emergency calls as least as often as the service expectation placed upon that resource. For instance, if a fire resource is expected to deliver service at the adopted standard 90% of the time, then that resource should be available to respond to an emergency incident from its assigned fire station at least 90% of the time. Reliability levels below the adopted performance expectation indicate resource exhaustion. 1.31. Resource Exhaustion: Resource exhaustion occurs when the demand for service placed upon a fire service resource is so great, that its fractile reliability begins to fall below the adopted level of service for that resource resulting in the need for resources from fire stations farther away to respond in place of the resource experiencing exhaustion. Resource exhaustion results in longer and longer response times unless additional resources are added to the fire station serving that area to create more capacity. 1.32. Response: Response refers to the movement of firefighters and fully equipped fire apparatus to the scene of an emergency request for fire or emergency medical services. The request for response is generally issued through Valley Communications Center, the 9-1-1 answering point for PSF. 1.33. Response District: Refers to the defined geographic area, generally a quarter mile square, used to determine the closest response resources to be assigned to an emergency within that response district. See 1.14 F-Box or Fire Box. 1.34. Risk: Refers to the exposure or probability of injury or loss. 1.34.1. Low Risk: A risk category where a low level and consequence of injury or loss is probable to occur. 1.34.2. Moderate Risk: A risk category where a moderate level and consequence of injury or loss is probable to occur. 1.34.3. High Risk: A risk category where a high level and consequence of injury or loss is probable 1.35. Standard(s) of Cover: Refers to the in-depth process developed by the Center for Public Safety Excellence for the strategic planning of fire resource deployment capable of meeting community risks. Standard of Cover is the “Standard” to which the fire department will deliver service based upon community descriptions and the risks within those community types. See Section 7.2. 6.E.b Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 5 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 1.36. Total Response Time: The time interval from the receipt of a 911 call at a public safety answering point to when response unit(s) arrive at the scene of an emergency. Total response time is made up of three components, alarm processing time plus turnout time plus drive time. 1.37. Turnout Time: See Section 6.2 6.E.b Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 6 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 2. Policy Statement 2.1. It is the policy of Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority (PSF) to participate in the orderly growth of the community and to maintain concurrency 2 of fire and life safety services as the community grows. Concurrency describes the goal of service capacity of PSF growing with or staying concurrent with the impacts of development occurring within the service area. PSF recognizes that regional economic vitality depends upon orderly growth and supports community growth through development and is not opposed to new development. 2.2. However, new development and the population increase that comes with new development has a direct impact on the ability of PSF to maintain adopted levels of service and adequate public safety concurrently with development. Consequently, PSF opposes the negative impacts development imposes upon fire service capacity and level of service performance and directs the Fire Chief to utilize the mitigation strategies found within this document to mitigate all negative impacts of development that threaten concurrency by reducing service capacity below the benchmark level of service standards adopted herein. 2.2.1. Levels of service standards and service capacity are adopted and defined in PSF’s Standard of Cover document. 2.3. The Fire Chief or their designee, shall cause the evaluation of each development proposed to occur within the service area. The Chief’s evaluation shall identify any adverse impacts that may affect PSF’s ability to maintain adopted benchmark levels of service and the mitigation strategies necessary to maintain concurrency with development. It is the intent of PSF to recognize when adequate service capacity exists and to only impose mitigations that are rational and relational to the impacts of new development upon service capacity. 2 See Section 1, Concurrency defined 6.E.b Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 7 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 3. Purpose Statement 3.1. The purpose of this policy is to establish guidelines for the implementation of monetary and non-monetary mitigations appropriate to maintaining fire service concurrency within PSF’s emergency response area. It is the intent to utilize the guidelines herein to mitigate the direct impacts of new development upon PSF’s ability to deliver fire and life safety services in accordance with its adopted level of service standards. Further, this policy as prepared shall constitute Growth Management, Impact Fee, SEPA, land subdivision, and building permit policy as adopted by the Governance Board of Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority. 4. Consistency with other Plans and Policies 4.1. To ensure that Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority (PSF) will be able to meet the increasing demand for fire protection services resulting from future development and population growth, this policy utilizes the findings and conclusions of a number of plans and policies including but not limited to; Covington, Kent, King County, Maple Valley and SeaTac Comprehensive Plans and, PSF’s; Capital Facilities Plan, Station Location Analysis, Standard of Cover and annual reports required by Chapter 52.33 RCW. 5. Primary Responsibility of Puget Sound Fire 5.1. The primary responsibility of PSF is the delivery of emergency fire and rescue services. The delivery of these services ideally originates from fire stations located throughout the service area. To provide effective emergency service, firefighters must respond in a minimum amount of time after the incident has been reported and with sufficient resources to initiate meaningful fire, rescue, or emergency medical services. 6. The Importance of Time and Fire Service Performance Measures 6.1 Time and Emergencies 6.1.1 Time and Fire Loss Time is the critical issue when an emergency is reported. Fire can expand at a rate many times its volume per minute and as a result, quick response is critical for the rescue of occupants and the application of extinguishing agents to minimize loss prior to flashover. The time segment between fire ignition and the start of fire suppression activities has a direct relationship to fire loss. 6.E.b Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 8 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 6.1.2 Time and Patient Survival The delivery of emergency medical services is also time critical. Survival rates for some types of medical emergencies are dependent upon rapid intervention by trained emergency medical personnel. In most cases, the sooner trained fire or emergency medical rescue personnel arrive, the greater the chance for survival and conservation of property. The importance of time and the critical factors affected by time are discussed in section 6.3. 6.2 Measured Components of Emergency Response 6.2.1. Alarm processing time: Amount of time that it takes to receive and process an emergency call. This includes (1) receiving the call, (2) determining what the emergency is, (3) verifying where the emergency is located, (4) determining what resources and fire department units are required to handle the call, and (5) notifying the fire department units that are to respond. 6.2.2. Turnout time: The time from when fire department units are first notified of an emergency to the beginning point of response time. This includes discontinuing and securing the activity firefighters were involved in at time of dispatch, traveling by foot to their apparatus, donning appropriate personal protective equipment and taking a seat-belted position on the apparatus to respond. 6.2.3. Response/Drive time: The time that begins when the wheels of a response apparatus/vehicle begin to roll in route to an emergency incident and ends when wheels of the response vehicle stop rolling upon arrival at the address of the emergency scene. 6.2.4. Access time: Amount of time required for the crew to move from where the apparatus stops at the address of an emergency incident, to where the actual emergency exists. This can include moving to the interior or upper stories of a large building and dealing with any barriers such as locked gates, stairways, elevators, doors, or other restrictions that may slow access to the area of the emergency. 6.E.b Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 9 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 6.2.5. Setup time 6.2.5.1. Setup time Fire: The amount of time required for fire department units to set up, connect hose lines, position ladders, and prepare to extinguish the fire. Setup time includes disembarking the fire apparatus, pulling, and placing hose lines, charging hose lines, donning self-contained breathing apparatus, making access or entry into the building, and applying water. The opportunity for saving time during setup is minimal, even for trained personnel. 6.2.5.2. Setup time EMS: Setup time also includes the time required for firefighters to deploy lifesaving equipment such as defibrillators, oxygen masks, and/or other rescue tools. 6.3 Flashover 6.3.1. The term flashover: Refers to the most dangerous time in fire growth. As a fire grows within a room, its radiant heat is absorbed by the contents of the room heating up the combustible gases and furnishings to their ignition point until finally the entire room bursts into flame, spreading outside of the room involved. Figure 1: Flashover 6.E.b Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 10 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 6.3.3. Factors that determine when flashover may occur: These include the type of fuel, the arrangement of the fuels in the room, room size, and so on. Because these factors vary, the exact time to flashover cannot be predicted, making quick response and rapid-fire attack the best way to control fire, protect life and reduce fire loss. 6.3.4. Flashover’s modern living influence: Over the past 50 years, fire engineers agree that the replacement of wood and other natural products with plastics and synthetic materials for interior furnishings has resulted in increased fuel loads, higher fire temperatures and decreasing time to flashover, making quick response more important than ever. Flashover can typically occur from less than four 4 to beyond 10 minutes after free burning starts depending upon the air or oxygen supply available to the fire. 6.3.5. Flashover and fire spread can be mitigated. Figure 2 shows the progression of fire and how some timeframes can be managed by the fire department and some cannot. The elapsed time from fire ignition to fire reporting varies but can be indirectly managed using remotely monitored fire alarm and suppression systems to help mitigate the growth of fire. These systems can automatically report the presence of a fire to a public safety answering point (PSAP) or 9-1-1 center. In a perfect world, all structures would be equipped with a monitored fire alarm and automatic fire sprinkler system to help reduce dispatch time and speed the arrival of fire department resources allowing firefighters to arrive at the scene when fires are smaller and more controllable. 6.E.b Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 11 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy Figure 2: Time vs. Products of Combustion 6.3.6. Significance of automatic fire sprinklers: As the above exhibit illustrates, properly maintained and functioning fire sprinkler systems in both residential, and commercial occupancies will activate to help control a fire long before the arrival of firefighting resources. Automatic fire sprinklers can control fire and buy firefighters significant time toward saving lives and minimizing loss from fire. In PSF’s case, there are often too few resources available to supply a full first alarm and the effective response force resources required for a structure fire. As a result, it is typical for structure fire responses to be supplemented with mutual aid companies from other jurisdictions or volunteer resources that take much longer to arrive, limiting PSF’s overall ability to control larger fires. This diagram illustrates fire growth over time and the sequence of events that may occur from ignition to suppression. Depending on the size of room, contents of the room and available oxygen, flashover can occur in less than 2 or more than 10 minutes. Flashover occurs most frequently between 4 and 10 minutes. 6.E.b Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 12 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 6.3.7. Flashover is deadly: Once flashover occurs, it is no longer possible for survival in the room of flashover. Not even firefighters in complete protective gear can survive the intense heat of flashover. A post-flashover fire burns hotter and moves faster, making search and rescue more difficult and riskier in the remainder of the structure. Once flashover occurs more firefighters are needed to deal with the much larger and growing fire problem. 6.3.8. Firefighting resources should arrive prior to flashover: Because of the dramatic change in fire conditions post flashover (see Figure 1) all fire based performance standards attempt to place fire resources on scene of a fire prior to flashover. 6.4 Brain Death in a Non-Breathing Patient 6.4.1. Timely treatment and a non-breathing patient is critical for survival: The delivery of emergency medical services (EMS) by first responders is also time critical for many types of injuries and events. If a person has a heart attack and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is started within four minutes, that person’s chances of leaving the hospital alive are almost four times greater than if they did not receive CPR until after four minutes. Exhibit 3 shows the survival rate for heart attack victims when CPR is available. Figure 3: Cardiac Survival Rate 3 6.4.2. Automatic defibrillation increases survival further: Chances of survival are increased with the intervention of a cardiac defibrillator. All PSF units 3 Source: National Fire Protection Association Handbook Volume 19 6.E.b Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 13 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy carry defibrillators. Exhibit 4 shows the survival rate of a heart attack victim with CPR and defibrillation. 6.4.3. Puget Sound Fire’s “Deadline:” Between 2000 and 2014, no patient has survived cardiac arrest where the total response time to arrival has exceeded 7 minutes and 34 seconds. Figure 4: Cardiac Survival with CPR and Defibrillation4 4 Data Source: King County Emergency Medical Services Response Time / Intervention vs. Survival 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 % Survival Unmanageable Time Time Varies Some Manageable Time Detection of Collapse 9-1-1 Dispatch Units Respond toRespond to SceneScene BLS/ALSBLS/ALS InterventionIntervention EMS Response Time 6.E.b Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 14 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 7. Recognized Standards for Fire Service Response Performance: 7.1 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 1710 7.1.1 NFPA 1710: establishes Standards for the Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, Emergency Medical Operations, and Special Operations to the Public by Career Fire Departments and contains the following time objectives to be performed 90% of the time: 7.1.1.1 Dispatch time: "All communications facilities, equipment, staffing, and operating procedures shall comply with NFPA 1221." NFPA 1221 sets the performance standard for alarm processing to dispatch time at 1-minute (60 seconds) 90 percent of the time. 7.1.1.2 Turnout time: Fire based response: 1 minute 20 seconds (80 seconds) Medical based response: 1 minute 00 seconds (60 seconds) 7.1.1.3. Fire response/drive time: Four minutes (240 seconds) or less for the arrival of the first arriving engine company at a fire suppression incident and/or eight minutes (480 seconds) or less for the deployment of a full first alarm assignment at a fire suppression incident. 7.1.1.4. Basic life support (BLS) response/drive time: Four minutes (240 seconds) or less for the arrival of a unit with first responder or higher-medical certification capability at an emergency medical incident. 7.1.1.5. Advanced life support (ALS) response/drive time: Eight minutes (480 seconds) or less for the arrival of an advanced life support unit at an emergency medical incident, where the service is provided by the fire department. 7.1.1.6. Total response time: Adding the three separate time segments together, the NFPA expects the following temporal benchmarks to be performed at least 9 out of every 10 times from receipt of a 9-1-1 call to the arrival of fire and EMS resources. Figure 5: NFPA’s Total Response Time Standards (minutes & seconds) • Fire call o First-in: = (Dispatch =1:00 + Turnout = 1:20 + Drive = 4:00) = 6:20 o Full alarm: (Dispatch = 1:00 + Turnout = 1:20 + Drive = 8:00) = 10:20 • EMS – Basic & Advanced Life Support Services o First-in:= (Dispatch =1:00 + Turnout = 1:00 + Drive = 4:00) = 6:00 o Full Alarm: = (Dispatch =1:00 + Turnout = 1:00 + Drive = 8:00) = 10:00 6.E.b Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 15 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 7.2 Center for Public Safety Excellence (CPSE) Standard of Cover 7.2.1. The Center of Public Safety Excellence is a consortium of the International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC), International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) the International City/County Management Association (ICMA), the International Code Council (ICC), the Insurance Services Office (ISO) the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and the U.S. Fire Administration (USFA). Together this group maintains the Commission on Fire Accreditation International (CFAI) and the criteria for fire departments to achieve Accredited Agency Status. Critical to achieving Accredited Agency Status is an assessment of the fire department’s ability to effectively deliver service. To make this assessment, the CFAI has established a methodology for; determining the fire and non-fire risks of a community, assessing the fire department’s capability compared to that risk, measuring fire department resource capacity and guidelines for performance standards to assess overall performance of a fire department. The CFAI publishes this methodology in its Standards of Cover manual. 7.2.2 The term standard of cover: Refers to the “standard(s)” to which a fire department runs daily operations in order to “cover” the service area of the fire department. The CFAI process for establishing a Standard of Cover has nine parts that are described below with relevant information to PSF: 7.2.2.1. Existing deployment assessment: Identifies current inventory of fire stations, apparatus, and staffing. PSF’s stations apparatus and staffing are found in PSF’s Capital Improvement and Equipment Plan. 7.2.2.2. Review of community expectations: Ultimately, level of service is driven by the community. PSF’s standards have been adopted herein and by the Cities of Kent and Covington in their Comprehensive Plans, both have undergone a public review and hearing process. Additionally, Fire District 43 and SeaTac have adopted minimum standards in their contracts for response services with PSF. 6.E.b Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 16 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 7.2.2.3. Community risk assessment: The CPSE requires adoption of benchmark response times for each component (alarm processing, turnout, drive) of response as well as separate benchmarks for both urban and rural deployment. Additionally, benchmarks must be established by type of incident, and category (low, moderate, and high) of risk associated the event. PSF has conducted this risk assessment across the 109 square miles of urban and rural areas in its 2019 Standard of Cover document. 7.2.2.4. Critical task analysis and staffing comparison: The CFAI requires staffing standards that can respond and providing adequate personnel to address the risks identified in the community risk assessment. 7.2.2.4.1 PSF’s current staffing and resources alone, are incapable of providing adequate staffing necessary to mitigate the potential response needs of high-risk occupancies. 7.2.2.5. Distribution of Resources: Fire stations should be distributed so that resources deployed from them can provide coverage to the response area within the level of service (LOS) standard established for first-in fire and rescue units. PSF’s Standard of Cover has revealed service areas where current fire station deployment cannot meet adopted service levels. 7.2.2.6. Concentration of Resources: Fire resources should be concentrated near high demand areas and in large enough numbers of equipment and personnel to provide an effective response force with the full first alarm assignment. Because of a lack of resources, PSF often relies on resources from neighboring fire departments to assemble an effective response force. Because of a lack of resources, PSF often relies on resources from neighboring fire departments to assemble an effective response force. 6.E.b Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 17 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 7.2.2.7. Capacity Analysis/Reliability: To achieve adopted performance standards, resources must be available or “reliable” at least as often as their adopted performance expectation. Historic reliability below the adopted performance standard places the service area in “Resource Exhaustion” and creates call stacking and simultaneous calls within a specific service area. PSF is currently experiencing resource exhaustion at Stations 45, 73, where reliability is below 90% during peak demand hours. 7.2.2.8. Historical response effectiveness studies: The percentage of compliance the existing response system delivers based on current LOS. 7.2.2.9. Overall Evaluation and Plan: Identifies performance issues, and strategies toward sustaining service levels and achieving benchmark performance. 7.2.3. Prevention and mitigation: CPSE recognizes the cost of providing fire services needs to be balanced to individual communities and therefore they emphasize the need for mitigation. Fire prevention, risk reduction, education, and code enforcement along with mitigation policies are encouraged. Prevention and mitigation efforts directly impact the level of safety for responding firefighters and the public. Using analysis of risk and looking at what strategic mitigations can be implemented may not only prevent the incident from occurring but may also minimize the severity when and if the incident occurs. 6.E.b Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 18 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 7.2.4. CPSE Standard: CPSE requires both temporal and staffing capability standards to assure timely arrival with adequate capability to address existing risk. Following is an example of the CPSE standard requirement: "For 90 percent of all moderate and high-risk structure fires the departments total benchmark response time, from the receipt of the 911 call in the secondary public safety answering point (PSAP) to the arrival of the first-due unit, staffed with at least two firefighters arriving on an aid car or three firefighters arriving on an engine or ladder truck shall be: 7 minutes 40 seconds in urban areas and 9 minutes 35 seconds in rural areas. The first-due unit for all risk levels shall be capable of: providing incident size up, initiating command, and requesting additional resources. If arriving on a fire engine, the first-due unit shall be capable of providing 500 gallons of water and 1,500 gallons per minute (gpm) pumping capacity; establishing and advancing an attack hose-line flowing a minimum of 150 gpm; or rescuing at-risk victims. These operations are done in accordance with the Department’s standard operating procedures while providing for the safety of responders and the public. (PSF is not currently capable of achieving this standard.) 6.E.b Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 19 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 8. State and Local Standards 8.1 Washington State Law 8.1.1. Chapter 52.33 RCW requires fire departments with paid staff to establish Level of Service (LOS) policies and performance objectives based on the arrival of first responders with defibrillation equipment prior to brain death and the arrival of adequate fire suppression resources prior to flashover. This law recognizes the NFPA’s Standard 1710 and the Commission on Fire Accreditation International’s (CFAI) Standard of Cover as bases for this statute and requires a 90% performance expectation of the established LOS. 8.2. King County Standards 8.2.1. The King County Comprehensive Plan and Countywide Planning Policies are based on the concept of concurrency and require that adequate facilities and services be available or be made available to serve development as it occurs. The County Comprehensive Plan recognizes the validity of using a response time analysis in determining appropriate service levels and recognizes the central role of fire protection districts and regional fire authorities in providing those services. However, King County has not adopted any fire service response standards. 8.3. City of Covington and Kent Response Standards 8.3.1. The Covington and Kent Comprehensive Plans have adopted the fire service response standards of the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority. 8.4. Fire District 43 (Maple Valley Fire & Life Safety) City of SeaTac 8.4.1. Fire District 43 and the City of SeaTac have established their own standards through a contract for services with PSF. District 43 and SeaTac response time standards exceed those adopted by PSF in its Standard of Cover. 8.5. PSF’s Standard of Cover 8.5.1. PSF maintains a “Standard of Cover” document as part of their accreditation process through the Center for Public Safety. The Standard of Cover is the “Standard” or Level of Service (LOS) to which the fire department will deliver services to the community. Performance below benchmark standards can contribute to unnecessary property and life loss. The continuum of time of fire service performance to adopted level of service standard 6.E.b Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 20 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy includes three main components measured at the 90th percentile (9 out of 10 times) of performance: 8.5.1.1. Dispatch time: The time interval from when a 9-1-1 call is answered, and appropriate resources dispatched through alerts to firefighters. 8.5.1.2. Turnout time: The time interval that begins when audible or visual notification is received by firefighters from the 9-1-1 center and ends when firefighters have donned appropriate protective equipment and safely seat-belted themselves in their response vehicle ready to drive. 8.5.1.3. Travel time: The time interval that begins when a response unit begins to move in route to the emergency incident location and ends when the unit arrives at the addressed location or, at the entryway to the addressed complex. 8.5.1.3.1. First unit arrival objectives: 90% performance expectation. Figure 6: PSFA First Unit Arrival Service Standard-Urban Areas • Urban Service Area: o Low Risk o Fire Dispatch (1:10) + Turnout (1:55) + Drive Time (5:35) = 8:40 o EMS Dispatch (1:30) + Turnout (1:45) + Drive Time (10:15) = 13:30 o Moderate Risk o Fire Dispatch (1:10) + Turnout (1:55) + Drive Time (4:35) = 7:40 o EMS Dispatch (1:10) + Turnout (1:45) + Drive Time (4:35) = 7:30 o High Risk o Fire Dispatch (1:10) + Turnout (1:55) + Drive Time (4:35) = 7:40 o EMS Dispatch (1:10) + Turnout (1:45) + Drive Time (4:35) = 7:30 6.E.b Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 21 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy Figure 7: PSFA First Unit Arrival Service Standard-Rural Areas • Rural Service Area: o Low Risk o Fire Dispatch (1:10) + Turnout (1:55) + Drive Time (7:35) = 10:00 o EMS Dispatch (1:30) + Turnout (1:45) + Drive Time (13:15) = 16:30 o Moderate and High Risk o Fire Dispatch (1:10) + Turnout (1:55) + Drive Time (6:30) = 9:35 o EMS Dispatch (1:10) + Turnout (1:45) + Drive Time (6:30) = 9:25 8.5.1.3.2. Fire minimum effective response force arrival objectives: (First three units) 90% performance expectation. Figure 8: PSFA Minimum Effective Response Force Standard • Urban Service Area: o Moderate and High Risk o Fire Dispatch (1:10) + Turnout (1:55) + Drive Time (6:45) = 9:50 • Rural Service Area: o Moderate and High Risk o Fire Dispatch (1:10) + Turnout (1:55) + Drive Time (8:40) = 11:45 6.E.b Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 22 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 8.5.1.3.3. Full first alarm arrival objectives: 90% performance Figure 9: PSFA Full First Alarm Response Force Standard • Urban Service Area: o Low Risk o Fire Dispatch (1:10) + Turnout (1:55) + Drive Time (7:55) = 10:00 o EMS Dispatch (1:30) + Turnout (1:45) + Drive Time (8:35) = 11:50 o Moderate Risk o Fire Dispatch (1:10) + Turnout (1:55) + Drive Time (12:55) = 16:00 o EMS Dispatch (1:10) + Turnout (1:45) + Drive Time (6:20) = 9:15 o High Risk o Fire Dispatch (1:10) + Turnout (1:55) + Drive Time (17:35) = 20:40 o EMS Dispatch (1:10) + Turnout (1:45) + Drive Time (6:20) = 9:15 • Rural Service Area: o Low Risk o Fire Dispatch (1:10) + Turnout (1:55) + Drive Time (9:55) = 12:00 o EMS Dispatch (1:30) + Turnout (1:45) + Drive Time (13:05) = 16:20 o Moderate Risk o Fire – Hydrant Supply Dispatch (1:10) + Turnout (1:55) + Drive Time (14:55) = 18:00 o Fire – Tender Supply Dispatch (1:10) + Turnout (1:55) + Drive Time (15:55) = 19:00 o EMS Dispatch (1:10) + Turnout (1:45) + Drive Time (8:20) = 11:15 o High Risk o EMS Dispatch (1:10) + Turnout (1:45) + Drive Time (8:20) = 11:15 6.E.b Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 23 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 8.5.2 Reliability is a measure of resource capacity. For a resource to be reliable, it must be available to answer emergency calls as least as often as the service expectation placed upon that resource. For instance, if a fire resource is expected to deliver service at the adopted standard 90% of the time, then that resource should be available to respond to an emergency incident from its assigned fire station at least 90% of the time. Reliability levels below the adopted performance expectation indicate resource exhaustion. Figure 10: PSF Reliability Objectives Performance Type Urban Rural Minimum Peak Hour Unit Reliability 90% 90% 9. Local Restriction on Level of Service 9.1. PSF Standards Assessment: PSF has assessed its ability to deliver service in compliance with established national standards finding that current deployment will not allow the department to meet recognized standards. As a result of the level of service analysis, PSF has completed a fire station deployment study with a focus on determining the optimum station location and resource deployment necessary to achieve effective response times. This study has considered the National Fire Protection Association’s Standard 1710, the Center for Public Safety Excellence’s (CPSE) Standard of Coverage recommendations and Chapter 52.33 RCW in establishing standards for emergency response. Resources required to close the gap between current performance and adopted benchmark levels of service are identified in the 2014-2033 Master Capital Facility and Equipment Plan and its subsequent annual 6-year updates. 9.2. Because of resource limitations and budget restrictions, PSF has adopted level of service standards that exceed the benchmark standards established by NFPA 1710, the CPSE and the guidelines of Chapter 52.33 by as much as 6 minutes. 6.E.b Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 24 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 10. Need for Mitigation of Development Impacts 10.1 Substandard performance: PSF’s current fire system performance falls short of national standards. Any additional impacts posed by new development will further erode PSF’s ability to deliver service at adopted standards. 10.1.1. Auto Aid: PSF must rely on resources from neighboring fire departments to assemble an effective response force. 10.1.2. Resource exhaustion: PSF is currently experiencing resource exhaustion at Stations 45 and 73 where reliability is below 90% during peak demand hours. 10.1.3. Service Standards: PSF has had to adopt level of service standards that exceed benchmark standards established by NFPA 1710, and the guidelines of Chapter 52.33 by as much as 6 minutes. 10.2. Revenue restrictions: Washington’s limit on annual tax collections (101% of the previous year) has eroded PSF’s ability to keep up with growth and inflation. An annual levy rate which began at $1.00 per thousand dollars of assessed value will quickly be devalued. This declining levy rate and, greater than one percent inflation has compounded recovery from the lingering effects of the great recession and the current impacts of the COVID pandemic. This has resulted in reductions in purchasing power, delays in hiring, and delays in equipment replacements within PSF. Since 2011 funding of capital replacement programs was reduced in favor of meeting increasing operating expense due to new community growth and inflation. This has led to underfunding the 2014 to 2033 capital plan timeline for additional resources. In August of 2019 voters approved PSF’s request to restore its tax levy to $1.00 per thousand of assessed value beginning in the 2020 tax year. Restoration of the levy should assist in better funding the capital needs of PSF. 10.3. Conclusion: Unless new development can mitigate their impacts on the fire service system in accordance with this policy, PSF must oppose all development occurring within PSF service area. 6.E.b Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 25 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 11. Determining Development Impacts 11.1. Concepts of Fire Service Capacity and Cascading Failure: 11.1.1 The deployment of fire and life safety resources such as fire engines and emergency medical vehicles is geographically based through planned selection of fire station locations. Fire station locations must be carefully chosen to allow the resource(s) deployed from these locations to reach all portions of the assigned service area within a time frame capable of providing successful outcomes for critically injured or non-breathing patients and, to prevent flashover and minimize life and property loss during a structure fire. 11.1.2. This type of geographic deployment depends on the availability of the resources assigned to that fire station location. System failure begins to occur when the demand for these resources is increased to a point where simultaneous requests for a resource begins to commonly occur because of exceeding the capacity of that resource. When service demand exceeds a fire station’s capacity, a resource from a fire station further away must respond in its place. The result of this situation is often referred to as cascading failure. The failure of one resource to be available to answer emergency calls cascades to the next closest fire station resource, leaving two service areas unprotected when the covering resource vacates its assigned area to make up for lack of capacity of the failing resource area. This effect continues to cascade out with a ripple effect to yet other fire stations and jurisdictions. 11.1.3. Cascading failure causes longer drive times to reach emergency scenes and as a result, it is less likely that those resources can positively affect the negative outcomes of flashover and brain death. 11.1.4. The solution to cascading failure is the addition of service capacity to the area experiencing substandard reliability. The deployment of additional fire resources results in considerable expense to a community; therefore, a delicate balance must be maintained to use but not exceed the service capacity of resources. 11.1.5. The Center for Public Safety Excellence refers to a fire resource’s capacity in their Standards of Cover guidelines, in terms of level of “reliability” of a fire resource. If a resource is available at least as often as the expected performance expectation, it is considered reliable. 11.1.6. PSF’s ability to meet its response time standards is directly affected by resource reliability. 6.E.b Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 26 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy Figure 11: Reliability Charts 6.E.b Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 27 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 11.2 Components of Response: 11.2.1. PSF tracks two primary performance measures. These measure the time required for the system to provide resources against the Level of Service goals established by PSF. 11.2.1.1. First is the arrival time of the initial arriving “first-in” or distribution resource. 11.2.1.2. Second is the arrival of the full first alarm assignment which provides the resources needed to effectively mitigate the emergency incident. This is referred to as the “Effective Response Force” (ERF) or concentration resources. An initial arriving resource can begin to render aid or perform other necessary tasks as a component of the ERF but cannot resolve the incident alone. The ERF for life threatening medical calls requires two or more resources. The ERF for a structure fire requires five or more resources. The additional resources of the ERF must respond from greater distances than the first-in resource therefore the first-in and ERF have separate performance expectations. 11.3 Effect of Development on Fire System Performance: 11.3.1. New development uses service capacity eroding the reliability and the temporal performance of fire service resources. 11.3.2. It is important to understand whether a new development is placed nearer to, or farther from a fire station, its use of service capacity will have a negative effect on the fire service systems performance. Therefore, the mitigation necessary to maintain fire service concurrency is not dependent on geographical location within a fire stations service area, but on the fact that each development consumes service capacity negatively affecting reliability and response performance. Those developing property away from existing fire stations directly impact the system because they are using capacity that would otherwise serve development close to existing fire stations. As close-in properties develop, they in turn, directly impact the system by reducing resource reliability for those developments that are more distant. 11.4. Mitigation Actions Required: 11.4.1. PSF’s limited funding and resources has caused the need to adopt standards that establish levels of service below nationally recognized benchmark standards. As a result, all new development has a direct impact on PSF’s service capacity. 6.E.b Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 28 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 11.5. Mitigation Options: Residential, Commercial and Regional Commercial 11.5.1. PSF staff may utilize the options listed below and/or any state or locally adopted building code set, and any NFPA or other recognized standard to mitigate the impacts of new development upon the ability of PSF to deliver adopted levels of service. 11.5.2. Acceptable mitigations shall appropriately address risk of the residential, commercial, or regional commercial development and may include, but not be limited to one or more of the following options to achieve concurrency: 11.5.2.1. Installation of automatic fire sprinkler systems to provide onsite fire control until PSF response units can arrive on scene. All automatic fire sprinkler systems shall comply with NFPA 13. 11.5.2.1.1. Exception: Partial flow through or multi-purpose or, water mist fire protection systems may be allowed in one and two-family structures upon approval of the Fire Marshal representing the authority having jurisdiction. 11.5.2.2. Installation of monitored alarm and alerting systems to provide early alerting to PSF. 11.5.2.3. Installation of fire walls or other building separations to reduce fire flow and/or firefighting resource requirements. 11.5.2.4. Use of alternate construction materials or design to reduce chance of fire spread between structures and aid in rescue operations. 11.5.2.5. Installation of systems or features that assist evacuation and sheltering in place. 11.5.2.5.1. Design and installation of areas of refuge in multi-story stairwells. 11.5.2.5.2. Installation of a central fire department lobby control with intercom systems in taller high-risk (multi-family housing) buildings to assist evacuation and sheltering in place. 11.5.2.6. Addition of access enhancements such as secondary access points, fire lanes, ambulance parking spaces etc. 6.E.b Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 29 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 11.5.2.7. Installation of incident reduction features such as grab bars in senior and disabled housing units. 11.5.2.8. Installation of monitored medical alarms. 11.5.2.9. Installation of alarm monitored defibrillators in public areas of multi-family housing, places of assembly, and public buildings. 11.5.2.10. Impact Fees. 11.5.2.11. Level of Service Fees. 11.5.3. Selected mitigation measures should be relational to the risk imposed by the development and its use. Time is the critical issue in the delivery of emergency fire and medical services. Mitigation measures should be appropriate and adequate to achieve a level of public safety that would be equivalent to PSF’s achievement of response time standards within a reasonable, six-year period. 6.E.b Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 30 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 12. Developer Agreements 12.1. Developer agreements may be required for all developments occurring within PSF service area when impact or level of service fees alone, do not adequately mitigate the risk of the new development or ensure concurrency. When determined by the Chief or his designee, PSF and the development applicant shall enter into a mitigation agreement that clearly identifies all mitigation necessary to maintain fire service concurrency. 12.2. Basis for Calculating Impact and Level of Service Fees (Appendix A): 12.2.1. Boundaries: As a point of reference, PSF boundaries and resources deployed within those boundaries shall be used to determine the service capacity according to PSF’s adopted response time standards. This policy shall be applied to all or administratively defined areas within the boundaries of PSF. 12.2.2. Property Categories: Properties are grouped by three basic categories, residential, commercial, and regional commercial. 12.2.2.1. Residential properties shall include both single family and multifamily units. 12.2.2.2. Commercial property shall be those property uses that would otherwise be classified as industrial, business, retail sales and services, wholesale sales, storage, assisted care facilities, churches and medical facilities. 12.2.2.3. A “regional commercial” designation may be applied to commercial properties when by design, location, and business plan is intended to serve a regional largely non-resident population. Regional commercial designations are likely to occur near regional transportation, shopping and entertainment centers, places of assembly, and will produce fire service impacts that are much higher than like properties in other areas serving resident populations. 12.2.3. Capital Improvements: PSF’s Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan identifies the resources and revenue needed to provide adequate service and maintain public health and safety over a 20-year planning cycle. Each year an updated Six Year Capital Improvement Plan shall be adopted to provide current levels of service and provide the basis for updating construction and equipment costs and impact and level of service fees. 12.2.4. Fire Department Service Demand: Past demand for fire department services to property categories identified above, shall be used to predict future service level demand to those proposed property types. The percentage of service use by new development and its impact on PSF Service Levels shall be used to determine 6.E.b Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 31 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy appropriate and relational contributions for each property type (see Appendix A, Res/Com Split). Needed expenditures for capital improvements identified in PSF’s Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan will be the basis for determining the construction and equipment costs (C&E) which are used in calculating impact fees and level of service contributions. 12.2.5. Usage Factor: The specific use of fire services by land use category. Use factors are based on actual incident rates. (See appendix A) 12.2.6. ERF (Effective Response Force) Factor: The minimum amount of staffing and equipment that must reach a specific emergency location within the maximum adopted level of service time capable of fire suppression, EMS and/or another incident mitigation. 12.2.7. New Development Share: That portion of C&E to be paid for by new development. New Development share is used to assure that new development pays only for improvements related to growth and maintenance of fire service concurrency. 12.2.8. Projected Development: The 20-year growth projections found in PSF’s Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan will be the basis for PSF calculations of future dwelling units and future square-footage of commercially developed properties. 6.E.b Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 32 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 13. Mitigation Methodology and Fee Application: 13.1. New Development Assessment: PSF shall pursue all appropriate mitigations necessary to maintain public safety and fire service concurrency through the provisions provided by the Growth Management Act (GMA), State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA), Washington State subdivision codes, and the adopted land use regulations in the authority having jurisdiction. 13.1.1. Impact Fees & Mitigations 13.1.1.1. In the PSF response area, where fire service impact fees have been adopted by the Authority Having Jurisdiction, will be assessed based on established fees found in Appendix A. Total fees will be calculated based on worksheets found in Appendix B or C. 13.1.1.2. PSF staff will determine appropriate non-fee mitigations that may be necessary in addition to impact fees to provide for adequate built-in protection or mitigations necessary for fire service concurrency to the proposed development. 13.1.1.3. PSF staff shall consider developer submitted alternate mitigations and fee amounts presented in a study that provides acceptable alternatives to the mitigations found in this policy. 13.1.2. Level of Service Fees & Mitigations 13.1.2.1. In areas where fire service impact fees have not been adopted in support of PSF by the authority having jurisdiction to permit building and land uses, each new development when proposed, and upon notice of application, shall have their direct impacts assessed and their appropriate mitigation options determined by PSF staff. 13.1.2.2. Appropriate Level of Service Contribution fees will be calculated and determined by applying the formula found in Appendix A. 13.1.3. Impact and Level of Service Fee Reduction: 13.1.3.1. Where automatic fire sprinklers are voluntarily installed in single family residential occupancies in compliance with RCW 82.02.100 a reduced fee equal to 70% of the impact or level of service fee shall serve to mitigate the costs of needed EMS and rescue resources. 6.E.b Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 33 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 13.1.4. Determination of fee – Adjustments – Exception – Appeals 13.1.4.1. The developer may be entitled to a credit for the value of any dedication of land for, improvements to, or new construction of any system improvement provided by the developer to fire protection facilities identified in the PSF Capital Plan. 13.1.4.2. The standard impact or level of service fee may be adjusted in one of the following circumstances: 13.1.4.2.1 The developer demonstrates that the impact fee was improperly calculated; or, 13.1.4.2.2. Where unusual circumstances are identified by the land use authority having jurisdiction, the developer or PSF staff, the fee may be adjusted in specific cases to ensure that impact fees are imposed fairly. Adjustments will be determined jointly by the director for the land use authority having jurisdiction and PSF’s designee. 13.1.4.3. In cases where a developer requests an independent fee calculation, adjustment exception or a credit pursuant to RCW 82.02.060(6), PSF’s designee will consult with the director for the land use authority having jurisdiction prior to making the final fee determination. 13.1.4.4. A developer may provide studies and data to demonstrate that any factor used by PSF may not be appropriately applied to the development proposal. 13.1.4.5. Any appeal about fee amounts shall follow the process for the appeal of the development application in the authority having jurisdiction for land use approval. 13.1.4.6. Impact fees may be paid under protest to obtain a building permit or a manufactured home permit. 6.E.b Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 34 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 13.1.5. Fee Collection Policy 13.1.5.1. Payment of impact fees shall comply with the guidelines of chapter 82.02 RCW, applicable implementing city/county codes, and will be collected by the jurisdiction having authority at time of permitting, or as defined by a required development agreement. Impact or level of service fees shall be based on the most recently adopted formula and fees. Any fees paid later than required shall be subject to interest at a rate of one (1) percent per month. 13.1.5.2. All impact fees collected by the authority having jurisdiction shall be held in separate account, transferred to PSF with interest, where they shall be held in a reserve account used to fund PSF’s Capital Improvement Plan. If impact fees are not utilized within ten years of receipt, a refund will be issued to the developer with interest. 13.1.5.3. All level of service fees collected, shall be held by PSF in a reserve account used to fund PSF’s Capital Improvement Plan. If a level of service fees is not utilized within five years of receipt, a refund will be issued to the developer with interest. 13.1.6. Multi-Family common space credit 13.1.6.1. Each MF dwelling unit shall be credited 50 square feet toward common spaces (not including commercial spaces) in other parts of residential portions of the structure. Total common spaces within the residential portion of the structure exceeding the sum of 50 square feet times the number of total dwelling units shall be assessed the per square foot fee identified in Appendix A for Commercial/Industrial properties for each square foot of common space exceeding the credited amount. 13.1.6.2. Common space credits per dwelling unit shall not apply to mixed use developments where separate commercial and parking spaces are not part of the common living areas of the multi-family space. 6.E.b Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 35 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 13.1.7. Fee Exempt Properties 13.1.7.1. Shelters or dwelling units for temporary placement, which provide housing to persons on a temporary basis not exceeding two weeks. 13.1.7.2. Rebuilding or remodeling of a legally established structure destroyed or damaged by fire, flood, explosion, act of nature or other accident or catastrophe; provided, that a building permit for the rebuilding or remodeling is issued within one year after such damage or destruction occurs. The exemption shall not apply to any additional structure or expansion of the original square footage that is proposed to be built on the same tax parcel on which the structure that was damaged or destroyed is being rebuilt or remodeled. 13.1.7.3. Projects in which existing dwelling units are converted into condominium ownership and where no new dwelling units are created. 13.1.7.4. Any development activity that is exempt from the payment of an impact fee pursuant to RCW 82.02.100(1), as amended. 13.1.7.5. Any development activity for which fire impacts have been mitigated pursuant to a voluntary agreement entered into with PSF to pay fees, dedicate land or construct or improve fire facilities; provided, that the agreement predates the effective date of impact fee imposition. 13.1.7.6. Any development of 200 square feet or less that does not use or store hazardous materials that would create a life safety risk. 13.1.7.7. Alterations of an existing nonresidential structure that does not expand the useable space and that does not involve a change in use. 13.1.7.8. Demolition of or moving an existing structure within PSF from one site to another. 13.1.7.9. Miscellaneous improvements that do not create additional demands and need for fire protection facilities, including, but not limited to, fences, walls, swimming pools, and signs. 13.1.7.10. Alteration or expansion of or remodeling of an existing dwelling or structure where the use is not changed. 6.E.b Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 36 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 13.1.7.11. Construction of an accessory dwelling unit on a parcel with an existing single-family dwelling unit; provided however, that this shall only exempt the construction from two-thirds of the normal residential impact fee that would otherwise apply. 13.1.7.12. Pursuant to RCW 82.02.100(2), where automatic fire sprinklers are voluntarily installed in single family residential occupancies, a reduced fee equal to 70% of the impact or level of service fee shall serve to mitigate the costs of needed EMS and rescue resources. 13.1.7.13. Existing structures retained and incorporated into a new subdivision of land. 13.1.8. Agreements 13.1.8.1. All mitigation agreements between PSF and developers shall be recorded as a lien against the property of the proposed development. Upon receipt of payment, PSF will promptly notify the appropriate authority having jurisdiction and remove any encumbrances recorded against the appropriate property. 6.E.b Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 37 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 14. PSF Funding Share 14.1. PSF Funding Participation: There is currently an identified need for additional fire facilities and equipment in PSF related to growth that occurred prior to this policy. Total funding of PSF’s Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan is split between PSF and new development. New development through impact fees or level of service fees shall only be required to fund that share related to new growth. PSF will share in the expense of needed resources as outlined below: 14.1.1. PSF will be directly responsible for the percentage of construction and equipment costs beyond the growth share determined for new development. 14.1.2. PSF will contribute shortages because of loss of, or default on collections of impact and level of service fees. 14.1.3. Estimated revenues are never fully realized from development and PSF will need to supplement shortages. 14.1.4. PSF will contribute the actual construction and equipment costs exceeding original estimates. 14.1.5. Payment of unanticipated costs associated with implementing PSF Capital Improvement Plan. 14.1.6. Advancing funds for capital expenses before total collection of impact fee or level of service contributions. 14.1.7. Management of this policy, and the Capital Improvement Plan. 6.E.b Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) 38 | Page PSRFA 2022 Mitigation and Level of Service Policy 15. Adequate Provisions for Public Safety, Limitations, Intent of Concurrency: 15.1. The safety and welfare of current and future residents of PSF is of paramount concern. It is recognized that this policy may have limitations and may not provide definitive guidance for effective mitigation of direct development impacts on PSF’s service capacity in all cases. 15.2. It is not the intent of this policy to limit PSF’s staff in making decisions outside of this policy where those decisions and mitigation options serve the intent of maintaining concurrency with development and protecting PSF’s service capacity, making rational and relational mitigation requests appropriate to the level of risk, and protecting the safety of the public and firefighters in a fair and consistent manner. 16. Policy Review and Adjustment: 16.1. At least annually, this Policy will be reviewed and amended as necessary. This review will include updates to reflect current level of service capacity. Amendments will be made consistent with the annual revision of the six (6) year Capital Improvement Plan and shall be approved through a resolution of PSF’s Governance Board. 6.E.b Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) ATTACHMENT A Appendix A LEVEL OF SERVICE & IMPACT FEE FORMULAS LOS Formula Calculation Land Use Type System wide C&E Res/Com Split Usage Factor ERF Factor New Dev Share Projected New Units 2014 - 2035 Impact Fee Residential Single-Family $114,707,712 60% 54% 1.13 80% 16,884 Units $1,989.90 / Unit Multi-Family 46% 1.4 $2,100.12 Commercial Commercia/Industrial $114,707,712 40% 23% 2.75 85% 12,500,000 SF $1.97 / SF Hospital/Medical Clinic/ Civic/School/Church 26% 2 95% $1.81 Senior Living/Assisted Care 21% 3 95% $2.20 Service - Hotel/Restaurant/Etc 20% 2 95% $1.39 LOS Formula Definitions • Land Use Type: Defines the land use types and structure uses that impact fees are assessed on. • System wide C&E: The construction and equipment costs for the 20-year time span of the Puget Sound RFA’s Master Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan. This cost is updated based on a combination of updated 6-year capital need changes and consumer price index (CPI) increases. • Res/Com Split: Percentage of annual emergency responses by property type; Residential = 60%, Commercial = 40%. • Usage Factor: The portion of Res/Com Split that emergency response resources are used by a specific property type. • ERF Factor: The ERF or effective response force factor represents the size of the first alarm emergency response in numbers of firefighters and equipment that is needed to effectively handle the risk posed by that property type. • New Dev Share: Represents the portion of C&E costs assigned to new development. The remaining portion is to be paid for by the RFA through annual tax collections. • Projected New Units: Defines the number of new units projected to be constructed within Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority service area between 2014 and 2035 • Impact Fee Amount: Represents the maximum fee to be paid by new development for each specific property type. This fee amount may be reduced by 30% for single-family homes only if an automatic sprinkler system is installed voluntarily. 6.E.b Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) Project Permit # _______________ Appendix B Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Impact Fee Calculation for New Residential Development Date of Analysis: ______________________ Project Address: __________________________________________ Project City: _______________________________ Land Parcel # __________________________________________ Impact Fee category (check one) and rate: Single-Family _______ Impact fee rate: $1,989.90/ Unit Multi-Family _______ Impact fee rate: $2,100.12 / Unit Optional Fee Credit for Single-Family Only: Sprinklers installed voluntarily (circle one): YES: 30% NO: 0% Total Fee Calculation: Impact Fee Rate = ______________ Residential units in development x ______________ Total impact fee amount $ ______________ New Residential Impact Fee to be assessed: Total impact fee amount $ ______________ – optional fee credit for SFR ______% = $______________ Use for Multi-Family Only Multi-Family Common Space Calculation: Total Common Space in development ______________SF – Credit for Residential units in development (# _________ units x 50 SF) Common Space area to be assessed = ______________SF Commercial/Industrial Impact fee rate: x $1.97 /SF Common Space Impact Fee amount $ ______________ Total New Multi-Family Impact Fee to be assessed: New Residential IF amount $ ______________ + Common Space IF amount $ ______________ = $______________ 6.E.b Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) Project Permit # _______________ Appendix C Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Impact Fee Calculation for New Commercial Development Date of Analysis: ______________________ Project Address: __________________________________________ Project City: _______________________________ Land Parcel # __________________________________________ Impact fee category (check one) and rate: Commercial/Industrial ______ Impact fee rate: $1.97/ SF Hospital/Medical/Civic/ School/Church ______ Impact fee rate: $1.81 / SF Senior Living/Assisted Care ______ Impact fee rate: $2.20 / SF Service–Hotel/Restaurant/Etc ______ Impact fee rate: $1.39 / SF Total fee calculation: Impact fee rate = _____________ Square footage of development x _____________ Impact Fee to be assessed: Total impact fee amount = $_________ 6.E.b Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Exhibit to Ordinance (2886 : Comprehensive Plan Amendement for the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan) Pending Approval City Council Workshop Workshop Regular Meeting Minutes October 5, 2021 Date: October 5, 2021 Time: 5:02 p.m. Place: Chambers I. CALL TO ORDER Attendee Name Title Status Arrived Toni Troutner Council President Present Bill Boyce Councilmember Present Brenda Fincher Councilmember Present Satwinder Kaur Councilmember Remote Marli Larimer Councilmember Present Zandria Michaud Councilmember Present Les Thomas Councilmember Present Dana Ralph Mayor Present II. PRESENTATIONS 1 Mid-Biennium Budget Adjustments Paula Painter 90 MIN. Finance Director Paula Painter walked the council through the questions that have been submitted by the councilmembers. Questions are appended to these minutes. Response to Q#4: Painter advised that the City has 165 budgeted police officer positions, 5 are frozen, 15 are vacant, but two offers have been accepted. Response to Q#26 and 27: Painter advised that Merina Hanson will provide a response during today's workshop. Q#28-31: Painter will send a follow-up email with responses. Q#32 - Painter advised there was an error on page 30 of the budget book and a corrected page was distributed to the Council. Q#33 - Painter will send a follow-up email with details. Q#34 - The Council considered discussing this question during an upcoming Operations and Public Safety Committee meeting. Q#35 - Painter will provide the chart without including ARPA funds. Q#36 - Parks committee will discuss this during the October 7th meeting. Q#37 - Painter indicated she will discuss this with Chief Padilla and will send a follow-up email to the Council. 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 233 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Oct 5, 2021 5:00 PM (Approval of Minutes) City Council Workshop Workshop Regular Meeting Minutes October 5, 2021 Kent, Washington Page 2 of 4 Q#38 & Q#39 - Painter will discuss with Chief and send a follow-up email. Q#40 - Councilmember Larimer spoke to her question. Public Works Director Chad Bieren provided responses to questions regarding placemaking at Naden, Military Road and Veterans Drive. Boyce and Thomas spoke in support of utilizing ARPA funds for placemaking. Bieren provided information on sidewalk improvement projects and related grants. Chief Administrative Officer Derek Matheson advised the proposed budget leaves approximately $7.3 million in ARPA funds that can be used through 2026, and the Council can consider utilizing those funds for additional sidewalk improvement projects. Q#41 - Chief Economic Development Officer Bill Ellis provided the Council with information on what the City has done in the past and continue to do with respect to reaching out to at-risk youth. Q#42 & Q#43 - Painter advised she will send a follow-up email with a response. Q#44 - Painter advised this was an error. Q#45 & Q#46 - Painter advised she will send a follow-up email with a response. Q#47 - Painter advised this will be discussed at a future Public Works committee meeting. Q#48 - Painter advised she will send a follow-up email with a response. Q#49 - Painter will check with Parks and send a follow-up email with a response. Q#50 - Painter advised this will be a collaborative discussion between the Mayor's Office, City Council, Human Services Commission and the Parks Department. Q#51 - Council discussed how to address graffiti. Matheson indicated there are a lot of logistical concerns, but there is a majority of the Council interested in this program, so staff will put together a rough proposal for the Council to consider. Human Service Manager Merina Hanson provided the Council with an overview of rental assistance. The current state bridge moratorium will end at the end of this month. So, until that time landlords cannot evict for past due rent during the course of the pandemic. In terms of available rent assistance - the vast majority of households in King County will get that assistance via the County’s EPRAP program. It’s a two pronged approach that includes both Eviction Prevention via the Housing Justice Project and Rent Assistance. EPRAP pays rent directly to landlords, on behalf of tenants. EPRAP will pay up to 9 months of current and past due rent, but the landlord would have to waive any additional past due owed. It can also pay up to 3 months of future 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 234 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Oct 5, 2021 5:00 PM (Approval of Minutes) City Council Workshop Workshop Regular Meeting Minutes October 5, 2021 Kent, Washington Page 3 of 4 rent . King County will contract with community-based organizations to coordinate the application and registration process for both tenants and landlords. Outreach & Assistance will include equity-based strategies and deploy critical resources such as language support services to households identified with higher risk of housing instability. What we know about EPRAP 2020 When we look at the data from 2020 in terms of households served, South King County cities were more likely to be served per capita. 2,523 Kent households to date have applied for rental assistance from King County 351 landlords in King County have applied for the property pool, representing 25,000 properties (including many in Kent). Hanson reviewed the local resources - Kent providers with rental assistance funds. Hanson provided the organizations receiving city-funded rental assistance. These are the programs the City funds just on a regular basis with our General Fund Human Services dollars. Hanson reviewed the programs the City is supporting with CARES Act funding. Building Resiliency Fund (ARPA). Right now, our emphasis is on flexibility. Recognizing that some of the funds will need to help fill gaps in that category of basic needs, crisis response. But also - hopeful that we can lean into the build back better concept and invest in some concepts that will help our residents be more resilient going forward so we aren’t so disparately impacted by the next crisis. After the moratorium, there are new protections in place that are designed to help. The Washington State Legislature recently adopted significant changes to landlord/tenant law: · Reasonable repayment plans · HB 1236 (Just Cause Eviction) · SB 1560 (Right to Counsel) · Eviction Resolution Pilot Program Council requested statistics on how many Kent residents received funding through King County. 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 235 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Oct 5, 2021 5:00 PM (Approval of Minutes) City Council Workshop Workshop Regular Meeting Minutes October 5, 2021 Kent, Washington Page 4 of 4 Matheson provided information on the City’s outreach regarding available resources. Meeting ended at 6:15 p.m. Kimberley A. Komoto City Clerk 8.A.1 Packet Pg. 236 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Oct 5, 2021 5:00 PM (Approval of Minutes) Pending Approval Kent City Council City Council Regular Meeting Minutes October 5, 2021 Date: October 5, 2021 Time: 7:03 p.m. Place: Chambers 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2. ROLL CALL Attendee Name Title Status Arrived Dana Ralph Mayor Present Toni Troutner Council President Present Bill Boyce Councilmember Present Brenda Fincher Councilmember Present Satwinder Kaur Councilmember Remote Marli Larimer Councilmember Present Les Thomas Councilmember Present Zandria Michaud Councilmember Present 3. AGENDA APPROVAL A. I move to approve the agenda as presented. RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Toni Troutner, Council President SECONDER: Les Thomas, Councilmember AYES: Troutner, Boyce, Fincher, Kaur, Larimer, Thomas, Michaud 4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Ralph provided details on the Battle of the Badges event that was held today in Auburn. Kent walked away with the trophy and Mayor Ralph expressed appreciation for the City of Auburn, Grocery Outlet, all participants and Joel Makings for his work organizing the event. A. King County Councilmember Reagan Dunn's State of the County King County Councilmember Reagan Dunn presented his State of the County that included an update on COVID-19 cases and vaccinations. Dunn touched on King County's approval of its 8th emergency COVID-19 budget, eviction prevention and rental assistance, the King County Regional Homelessness Authority, homelessness legislation, support of addiction recovery and mental health, public safety and King County's investments in Kent. B. Public Recognition I. Employee of the Month 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 237 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Oct 5, 2021 7:00 PM (Approval of Minutes) Kent City Council City Council Regular Meeting Minutes October 5, 2021 Kent, Washington Page 2 of 7 Mayor Ralph recognized Julie Stangle as the October employee of the month. II. Proclamation for Eleventh Annual Kent Turkey Challenge Mayor Ralph presented Tyler Morrison from Torklift Northwest with the Proclamation for the Eleventh Annyual Kent Turkey Challenge. Morrison provided details regarding the upcoming event. III. Proclamation for Celebrate Community Day Mayor presented the Proclamation for Celebrate Community Day. IV. Communications Division Awards Mayor Ralph announced the following awards received by the City's Communications Division: five 3CMA Savvy awards recognizing outstanding local government achievements in communications, public-sector marketing and citizen-government relations and multiple NATOA awards recognizing excellence in broadcast, cable, multimedia and electronic programming produced by local government agencies. C. Community Events Council President Troutner advised of upcoming events at the accesso ShoWare Center and also of the "Hops & Cops" event that will be held on October 15th starting at 5:30 p.m. at Half Lion Public House. Councilmember Fincher advised of upcoming Spotlight Series events. D. Economic and Community Development Report Chief Economic Development Officer Bill Ellis presented the Council with the Economic and Community Development Report. Ellis provided details on consumer spending trends and employment rate recovery. Boeing and Sysco are testing new transport vehicles that will lower emissions and PACCAR is re-retooling for electric, automation. Ellis talked about work being done to retool workforce development and education for the next generation. 5. REPORTS FROM COUNCIL AND STAFF A. Mayor Ralph's Report Mayor Ralph serves on the Puget Sound Regional Council Operations Committee that recently passed proposal to recognize Juneteenth. Mayor Ralph serves on the Puget Sound Regional Council Executive 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 238 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Oct 5, 2021 7:00 PM (Approval of Minutes) Kent City Council City Council Regular Meeting Minutes October 5, 2021 Kent, Washington Page 3 of 7 Committee that recently discussed ARPA funding for regional transit. The equity advisory committee increased membership from 15-20 in hopes of increasing participation from the Asian Pacific Islander community. Mayor Ralph provided information on her recent tour of the Demonstrator Farm in Redmond that focuses on farming with compost. Mayor Ralph attended the Kentridge Key Club meeting and is excited over their recent letter-writing campaign to seniors. Mayor Ralph dropped the puck on Saturday at the pre-season Kraken game at the accesso ShoWare Center. B. Chief Administrative Officer's Report Chief Administrative Officer Derek Matheson advised his written report is included in today's agenda packet and there is no executive session tonight. C. Councilmembers' Reports Councilmember Troutner provided a recap of today's Operations and Public Safety Committee agenda items and today's workshop topics. Troutner serves on the Regional Law, Safety and Justice Committee that recently heard presentations on ending mass incarnation and justice for the Girl's Coalition of Washington. Councilmember Troutner serves as the Vice-Chair of the Regional Transit committee that has been discussing updating Metro's policies. Troutner serves as the Chair on WRIA 9 that improves watershed health in the Puget Sound area. The group recently toured the Downey Farmstead and Nelson side channel to see how funds are being used. Councilmember Larimer serves on the King County Affordable Housing Committee that heard a presentation from the Master Builders Association on building affordable housing. Councilmember Thomas serves on the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Governance Board that will meet on October 7th at 5:30. Call 253-856-4300 for information. Councilmember Fincher serves on the King Conservation District that has been reviewing food grants. Councilmember Fincher serves on the Mental Illness and Drug Dependency Advisory Committee that recently received a presentation on peer 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 239 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Oct 5, 2021 7:00 PM (Approval of Minutes) Kent City Council City Council Regular Meeting Minutes October 5, 2021 Kent, Washington Page 4 of 7 counseling. Fincher serves on the Kent Arts Commission that is currently holding an art contest entitled "Free to Roam." Visit KentWA.gov for details on how to submit art. Fincher chairs the Public Works Committee and provided a recap of the agenda items from the last meeting. 6. PUBLIC HEARING A. First Public Hearing on the 2022 Mid-Biennium Budget Adjustments Mayor Ralph provided an introduction of the public hearing process. Mayor Ralph opened the first public hearing on the 2022 Mid-Biennium budget adjustments. Finance Director, Paula Painter provided an overview of the 2022 mid- biennium budget adjustments, including income, expenses and provided an overview of the ARPA framework. No public comment was received. 1. I move to close the public hearing on the first public hearing on the 2022 Mid-Biennium Budget Adjustments. RESULT: MOTION PASSES [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Toni Troutner, Council President SECONDER: Les Thomas, Councilmember AYES: Troutner, Boyce, Fincher, Kaur, Larimer, Thomas, Michaud B. First Public Hearing on the 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program Mayor Ralph provided a brief introduction of the public hearing process. Mayor Ralph opened the first public hearing on the 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program. Finance Director Paula Painter provided details on the 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program and reviewed revenues and expenses for each of the six years. Public Comment: Andrew Dinsmore, a Kent resident, provided comment and requested additional allocations for sidewalk improvements at S.E. 256th Street and 132nd Avenue S.E. 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 240 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Oct 5, 2021 7:00 PM (Approval of Minutes) Kent City Council City Council Regular Meeting Minutes October 5, 2021 Kent, Washington Page 5 of 7 Don Dinsmore, a Kent resident, provided public comment and requested additional allocations for sidewalk improvements West on S.E. 256th Street and 132nd Avenue S.E. 1. I move to close the first public hearing on the 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program. RESULT: MOTION PASSES [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Toni Troutner, Council President SECONDER: Les Thomas, Councilmember AYES: Troutner, Boyce, Fincher, Kaur, Larimer, Thomas, Michaud 7. PUBLIC COMMENT T.J. Peterson, a Kent resident, provided public comment on the Strategic Homelessness Plan of Kent and requested additional housing for the homeless community. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR I move to approve Consent items A - G. RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Toni Troutner, Council President SECONDER: Les Thomas, Councilmember AYES: Troutner, Boyce, Fincher, Kaur, Larimer, Thomas, Michaud A. Approval of Minutes 1. Council Workshop - Workshop Regular Meeting - Sep 21, 2021 5:00 PM 2. City Council Meeting - City Council Regular Meeting - Sep 21, 2021 7:00 PM 3. City Council Meeting - City Council Special Meeting - Sep 28, 2021 4:00 PM 4. Council Workshop - Workshop Special Meeting - Sep 28, 2021 4:30 PM B. Payment of Bills - Authorize MOTION: I move to authorize the payment of bills received through 9/15/21 and paid on 9/15/21 and authorize the checks issued for payroll 9/1/21-9/15/21 and paid on 9/20/21, all audited by the Operations and Public Safety Committee on 9/21/21. C. Accept the 2021 Crack Sealing Project as Complete - Authorize 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 241 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Oct 5, 2021 7:00 PM (Approval of Minutes) Kent City Council City Council Regular Meeting Minutes October 5, 2021 Kent, Washington Page 6 of 7 MOTION: I move to authorize the Mayor to accept the 2021 Crack Sealing Project as complete and release retainage to Huizenga Enterprises, LLC upon receipt of standard releases from the State and the release of any liens. D. Media Forensic Software Contract - Authorize MOTION: I move to authorize the Mayor to sign a contract with Gladiator Forensics, LLC to purchase software, equipment, licenses, and maintenance fees for a total cost of $139,298.52 for an initial five-year term, with options to extend the contract annually thereafter up to a maximum contract term of ten years, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the Police Chief and City Attorney. E. Lease Agreement with T-Mobile West Tower LLC by and through CCTMO LLC - Authorize MOTION: I move to authorize the Mayor to execute a lease agreement with T-Mobile West Tower LLC, by and through CCTMO LLC to operate and maintain a wireless communication facility at Pump Station No. 5, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the Public Works Director and City Attorney. F. Termination of Drainage Easements and Sidewalk Easement on Bridge Point Kent 300 LLC Property - Authorize MOTION: I move to authorize the Mayor to sign terminations of two drainage easements and a sidewalk easement on property owned by Bridge Point Kent 300, LLC subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the Public Works Director and City Attorney. G. Environmental Covenant with State of Washington, Pollution Liability Insurance Agency and G/R Meeker Street LLC - Authorize MOTION: I move to authorize the Mayor to execute an environmental covenant with the State of Washington, Pollution Liability Insurance Agency and G/R Meeker Street LLC, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the Public Works Director and City Attorney. 9. OTHER BUSINESS None. 10. BIDS A. Kent Police Headquarters Renovation Project Bid - Award 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 242 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Oct 5, 2021 7:00 PM (Approval of Minutes) Kent City Council City Council Regular Meeting Minutes October 5, 2021 Kent, Washington Page 7 of 7 Facilities Superintendent Will Moore presented the bid results for the Kent Police Headquarters Renovation Project and recommending awarding the bid to Christensen Inc., General Contractor. MOTION: I move to award the Kent Police Headquarters Renovation Project to Christensen Inc., General Contractor in an amount not to exceed $700,236.00 and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary documents, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the Parks Director and City Attorney. RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Bill Boyce, Councilmember SECONDER: Zandria Michaud, Councilmember AYES: Troutner, Boyce, Fincher, Kaur, Larimer, Thomas, Michaud 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION AND ACTION AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION None. 12. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Ralph adjourned the meeting. Meeting ended at 8:34 p.m. Kimberley A. Komoto City Clerk 8.A.2 Packet Pg. 243 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Oct 5, 2021 7:00 PM (Approval of Minutes) DATE: October 19, 2021 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Payment of Bills - Authorize MOTION: I move to authorize the payment of bills received through 9/30/21 and paid on 9/30/21 and approve the checks issued for payroll 9/16/21-9/30/21 and paid on 10/5/21, all audited by the Operations and Public Safety Committee on 10/5/21. SUMMARY: Approval of payment of the bills received through-----09/30/21 and paid 09/30/21 Approval of checks issued for Vouchers: Date Amount 09/30/21 Wire Transfers 8914 8929 $1,980,505.00 09/30/21 Regular Checks 755798 756279 $7,557,903.44 09/30/21 Payment Plus 103560 103617 $259,185.43 Void Checks $0.00 09/30/21 Use Tax Payable $3,285.44 $9,800,879.31 Approval of checks issued for Payroll:9/16/21-9/30/21 and paid 10/5/2021 Date Amount 10/5/2021 Checks $1,861,597.65 Voids and Reissues 10/5/2021 Advices FR&P 463234 463242 $7,074.04 Total Payroll $1,868,671.69 Document Numbers Document Numbers 10/05/21 Operations and Public Safety Committee MOTION PASSES 8.B Packet Pg. 244 RESULT: MOTION PASSES [UNANIMOUS] Next: 10/19/2021 7:00 PM MOVER: Les Thomas, Councilmember SECONDER: Bill Boyce, Councilmember AYES: Troutner, Boyce, Fincher, Kaur, Larimer, Michaud, Thomas 8.B Packet Pg. 245 DATE: October 19, 2021 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Accept the South 192nd Street Sanitary Sewer Project as Complete - Authorize MOTION: I move to authorize the Mayor to accept the South 192nd Street Sanitary Sewer Repair Project as complete and release retainage to Scarsella Bros., Inc. upon receipt of standard releases from the State and the release of any liens. SUMMARY: This project replaced approximately 150 feet of sanitary sewer pipe along South 192nd Street immediately west of East Valley Highway (84th Avenue South). A side sewer pipe failed and caused the sewer main, sidewalk and a portion of the roadway to settle. This project included replacement of pipe and the repair of affected sidewalk and roadway. The final contract total paid was $261,393.48 which is $29,791.89 over the original contract amount of $231,601.59. BUDGET IMPACT: The project was budgeted and paid for using Sanitary Sewer Utility funds. SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Evolving Infrastructure - Connecting people and places through strategic investments in physical and technological infrastructure. 8.C Packet Pg. 246 DATE: October 19, 2021 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: 2022 South King Housing and Homelessness Partners Work Plan - Approve MOTION: I move to approve the 2022 South King Housing and Homelessness Partners Work Plan as adopted by the SKHHP Executive Board on July 23, 2021. SUMMARY: In accordance with the Interlocal Agreement the annual South King Housing and Homelessness Partners (SKHHP) work plan must be approved by the legislative body of each member jurisdiction in addition to the SKHHP Executive Board. Each SKHHP jurisdiction had an opportunity to review and provide feedback on the work plan and budget prior to Executive Board adoption. Kent City Council reviewed the 2022 SKHHP work plan and budget priorities at the City Council workshop on May 18, 2021. The feedback from member jurisdictions was used to draft the 2022 SKHHP budget adopted by the SKHHP Executive Board on July 23, 2021. BACKGROUND: The South King Housing and Homelessness Partners (SKHHP) was established through an interlocal agreement to work together and share resources to increase the available options for South King County residents to access affordable housing and preserve the existing affordable housing stock. The SKHHP 2022 work plan and budget operationalizes the SKHHP mission and goals and provides an itemization of all categories of budgeted expenses and itemization of each Party’s contribution, including in-kind services. Consistent with the SKHHP Interlocal Agreement, the SKHHP 2022 work plan and budget must be approved by each legislative body and adopted by the SKHHP Executive Board. The 2022 work plan includes three major areas of work that will facilitate implementation of the SKHHP Interlocal Agreement: governance and administration; policy and planning; and education and outreach. The 2022 work plan builds on work done in 2020 and 2021 to establish the SKHHP Housing Capital Fund through pooled public resources, increase philanthropic and corporate investment through creation of a SKHHP 501(c)(3) fundraising branch, and establish a SKHHP Advisory Board made up of community members that will help to ground SKHHP decision in community needs and interests. 8.D Packet Pg. 247 The governance and administration work area includes strategic planning to set 3-5 year goals for the organization, annual work plan and budget process, quarterly progress and budget reports, and annual reporting to stakeholders and non-SKHHP South King County cities. The policy and planning work area includes: administering and allocating funds from the SKHHP Housing Capital Fund and coordinating with partner jurisdictions to enhance and develop new local housing policies and programs. The outreach and education work area includes: representing South King County at local and regional decision tables and further strengthening regional stakeholders’ understanding of housing needs and opportunities in South King County. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Innovative Government - Delivering outstanding customer service, developing leaders, and fostering innovation. Sustainable Services - Providing quality services through responsible financial management, economic growth, and partnerships. Inclusive Community - Embracing our diversity and advancing equity through genuine community engagement. ATTACHMENTS: 1. SKHHP Work Plan Exhibit (PDF) 10/07/21 Parks and Human Services Committee MOTION PASSES RESULT: MOTION PASSES [UNANIMOUS] Next: 10/19/2021 7:00 PM MOVER: Toni Troutner, Councilmember SECONDER: Satwinder Kaur, Councilmember AYES: Zandria Michaud, Satwinder Kaur, Toni Troutner 8.D Packet Pg. 248 8.D.a Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: SKHHP Work Plan Exhibit (2868 : 2022 SKHH Partners Work Plan - Approve) Section 2. The Executive Board adopts the SKHHP 2022 Budget as shown in Attachment B. Section 3. Each party's contribution to SKHHP's operating budget will be transmitted on an annual basis during the first quarter of the calendar year. Section 4. This Resolution will take effect and be in full force upon approval by the legislative body of each participating jurisdiction. Dated and Signed this _28_ day of ___July____ , 2021. SOUTH KING COUNTY HOUSING AND HOMELESSNESS PARTNERS Resolution No. 2021-03 July 23, 2021 Page 2 of 8 Rev. 2019 8.D.a Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: SKHHP Work Plan Exhibit (2868 : 2022 SKHH Partners Work Plan - Approve) 8.D.a Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: SKHHP Work Plan Exhibit (2868 : 2022 SKHH Partners Work Plan - Approve) 8.D.a Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: SKHHP Work Plan Exhibit (2868 : 2022 SKHH Partners Work Plan - Approve) 8.D.a Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: SKHHP Work Plan Exhibit (2868 : 2022 SKHH Partners Work Plan - Approve) 8.D.a Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: SKHHP Work Plan Exhibit (2868 : 2022 SKHH Partners Work Plan - Approve) 8.D.a Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: SKHHP Work Plan Exhibit (2868 : 2022 SKHH Partners Work Plan - Approve) DATE: October 19, 2021 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: 2022 South King Housing and Homelessness Partners Budget - Approve MOTION: I move to approve the 2022 South King Housing and Homelessness Partners Budget as adopted by the SKHHP Executive Board on July 23, 2021. SUMMARY: The South King Housing and Homelessness Partners (SKHHP) 2022 Budget provides an itemization of all categories of budgted expenses and each partner's contribution, including in-kind services. In accordance with the Interlocal Agreement, the annual South King Housing and Homelessness Partners (SKHHP) budget must be approved by the legislative body of each member jurisdiction in addition to the SKHHP Executive Board. Each SKHHP jurisdiction had an opportunity to review and provide feedback on the work plan and budget prior to Executive Board adoption. The Kent City Council reviewed the 2022 SKHHP work plan and budget priorities at the City Council workshop on May 18, 2021. The feedback from member jurisdictions was used to draft the budget adopted by the SKHHP Executive Board on July 23, 2021. BACKGROUND: The South King Housing and Homelessness Partners (SKHHP) was established through an interlocal agreement to work together and share resources to increase the available options for South King County residents to access affordable housing and preserve the existing affordable housing stock. Attributable to the Interlocal Agreement, including an adopted budget before staff was hired and before the City of Auburn became the administering agency, the adopted budget for 2019 and 2020 was a projection of operating costs that did not cover the full SKHHP operating costs. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting revenue shortfalls and budget uncertainties, the original jurisdictions’ contributions were maintained in 2021. This was made possible by personnel cost savings from 2019 and 2020. This decision intentionally spent down some of the cost savings from the previous two years to cover operating costs and deferred consideration of increasing member contributions to the 2022 operating budget. During the development of the 2022 SKHHP operating budget, feedback from 8.E Packet Pg. 256 SKHHP partner jurisdictions and the SKHHP staff workgroup identified the following budget priorities for 2022: · Work towards a balanced budget · Increase staff capacity to two full-time positions · Consider a compensation structure for SKHHP Advisory Board members The 2022 SKHHP operating budget operationalizes these priorities by increasing jurisdiction contributions by 15%. The SKHHP budget contributions are based on population size, as shown in the attachment to the resolution. Kent's 2022 SKHHP contribution is $39,100. If there are any additional contributions to SKHHP's operating budget from sources such as: existing SKHHP partners, additional partners that become part of SKHHP, or contributions or donations from outside sources, each SKHHP partner contribution could be reduced through an amended budget. BUDGET IMPACT: None - Kent’s $39,100 contribution is currently within the Human Services budget. SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Innovative Government - Delivering outstanding customer service, developing leaders, and fostering innovation. Sustainable Services - Providing quality services through responsible financial management, economic growth, and partnerships. Inclusive Community - Embracing our diversity and advancing equity through genuine community engagement. ATTACHMENTS: 1. SKHHP Budget Exhibit (PDF) 10/07/21 Parks and Human Services Committee MOTION PASSES RESULT: MOTION PASSES [UNANIMOUS] Next: 10/19/2021 7:00 PM MOVER: Satwinder Kaur, Councilmember SECONDER: Toni Troutner, Councilmember AYES: Zandria Michaud, Satwinder Kaur, Toni Troutner 8.E Packet Pg. 257 8.E.a Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: SKHHP Budget Exhibit (2869 : 2022 SKHHP Budget - Approve) DATE: October 19, 2021 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award MOTION: I move to award the Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project to Christensen Inc., General Contractor in an amount not to exceed $134,211.90 and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary documents, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the Parks Director and City Attorney. SUMMARY: This project involves expanding the existing detectives area and relocating the existing 3rd-floor lunchroom at the Centennial Center. The scope of work includes demolition of designated walls and flooring, construction of a new wall, new flooring, paint, and electrical modifications. The Bid Opening for the Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement project was held on October 01, 2021, with six bids received. The lowest responsible and responsive bid was submitted by Christensen Inc., General Contractor, in the amount of $121,900, which does not include Washington State Sales Tax. Bid Tab Summary 01. Christensen Inc., General Contractor $121,900.00 02. Regency Northwest Construction, LLC $129,700.00 03. CFC Construction $142,800.00 04. MAD Construction $160,359.76 05. Alegis Construction $184,100.00 06. Westmark Construction $205,600.00 Engineers Estimate $130,000 BUDGET IMPACT: Project funded through the City’s Capital Resources Fund. 8.F Packet Pg. 259 SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Evolving Infrastructure - Connecting people and places through strategic investments in physical and technological infrastructure. Sustainable Services - Providing quality services through responsible financial management, economic growth, and partnerships. ATTACHMENTS: 1. DTI Contract (PDF) 2. Christensen Inc Bid (PDF) 10/07/21 Parks and Human Services Committee MOTION PASSES RESULT: MOTION PASSES [UNANIMOUS] Next: 10/19/2021 7:00 PM MOVER: Toni Troutner, Councilmember SECONDER: Satwinder Kaur, Councilmember AYES: Zandria Michaud, Satwinder Kaur, Toni Troutner 8.F Packet Pg. 260 PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 1 (Over $20K with Performance Bond) PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT between City of Kent and Christensen, Inc., General Contractor THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the City of Kent, a Washington municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City"), and Christensen, Inc., General Contractor, organized under the laws of the State of Washington, located, and doing business at 2840 Crites St. SW, Suite 100, Tumwater, WA 98512, (360) 709-0330, Kevin Christensen , (hereinafter the "Contractor"). AGREEMENT The parties agree as follows: I. DESCRIPTION OF WORK. Contractor shall perform the following services for the City in accordance with the following described plans and/or specifications: Christensen, Inc., General Contractor, shall provide all labor and materials to expand existing detective’s area and relocate 3 rd floor lunchroom at the Centennial Center. The scope of work includes demolition of designated walls and flooring, construction of a new wall, new flooring, paint, and electrical modifications, in accordance with the contractor's bid, which is attached and incorporated as Exhibit A. The Contractor further represents that the services furnished under this Agreement will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices within the Puget Sound region in effect at the time such services are performed. II. TIME OF COMPLETION. The parties agree that work will begin on the tasks described in Section I above within five (5) calendar days after the City issues its Notice to Proceed . Upon the effective date of this Agreement , all physical work shall thereafter be completed within (90) working days. The term of this Agreement shall continue until all work has been completed, final acceptance has occurred, and all Contractor obligations have been fulfilled. III. COMPENSATION. The City shall pay the Contractor a total amo unt not to exceed $134,211.90, including any applicable Washington State Sales Tax, for the work and services contemplated in this Agreement. The Contractor shall invoice the City monthly. The City will pay for the portion of the work described in the invoice that has been completed by the Con tractor and approved by the City. The City’s payment shall not constitute a waiver of the City’s right to final inspection and acceptance of the project. Card Payment Program . The Contractor may elect to participate in automated credit card payments provided for by the City and its financial institution. This Program is provided as an alternative to payment by check and is available for the convenience of the Contractor. If the Contractor voluntarily participates in this Program, the Contractor will be solely responsible for any fees imposed by financial institutions or credit card companies. The Contractor shall not charge those fees back to the City. 8.F.a Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: DTI Contract (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 2 (Over $20K with Performance Bond) A. Payment and Performance Bond. Pursuant to Chapter 39.08 RCW, the Contractor, shall provide the City a payment and performance bond for the full contract amount . B. Retainage. The City shall hold back a retainage in the amount of five percent (5%) of any and all payments made t o the Contractor for a period of sixty (60) days after the date of final acceptance, or until receipt of all necessary releases from the State Department of Revenue, the State Department of Labor & Industries , and the State Employment Security Department, and until settlement of any liens filed under Chapter 60.28 RCW, whichever is later. The amount retained shall be placed in a fund by the City pursuant to RCW 60.28.011(4)(a), unless otherwise instructed by the Contractor within fourteen (14) calendar days of the Contractor’s signature on the Agreement . C. Defective or Unauthorized Work. The City reserves its right to withhold payment from the Contractor for any defective or unauthorized work. Defective or unauthorized work includes, without limitation: work and materials that do not conform to the requirements of this Agreement; and extra work and materials furnished without the City’s written approval. If the Contractor is unable, for any reason, to satisfactorily complete any portion of the work, th e City may complete the work by contract or otherwise, and the Contractor shall be liable to the City for any additional costs incurred by the City. “Additional costs” shall mean all reasonable costs, including legal costs and attorney fees, incurred by t he City beyond the maximum Contract price specified above. The City further reserves its right to deduct the cost to complete the Contract work, including any Additional Costs, from any and all amounts due or to become due the Contractor. D. Final Payment: Waiver of Claims. THE CONTRACTOR’S ACCEPTANCE OF FINAL PAYMENT (EXCLUDING WITHHELD RETAINAGE) SHALL CONSTITUTE A WAIVER OF CONTRACTOR’S CLAIMS, EXCEPT THOSE PREVIOUSLY AND PROPERLY MADE AND IDENTIFIED BY CONTRACTOR AS UNSETTLED AT THE TIME FINAL PAYMENT IS MADE AND ACCEPTED. IV. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The parties intend that an Independent Contractor- Employer Relationship will be created by this Agreement. By their execution of this Agreement, and in accordance with Ch. 51.08 RCW, the parties make the following representations: A. The Contractor has the ability to control and direct the performance and details of its work, the City being interested only in the results obtained under this Agreement. B. The Contractor maintains and pays for it s own place of business from which the Contractor’s services under this Agreement will be performed. C. The Contractor has an established and independent business that is eligible for a business deduction for federal income tax purposes that existed befor e the City retained the Contractor’s services and is a service other than that furnished by the City, or the Contractor is engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession, or business of the same nature as that involved under this Agr eement. D. The Contractor is responsible for filing as they become due all necessary tax documents with appropriate federal and state agencies, including the Internal Revenue Service and the state Department of Revenue. E. The Contractor has registered i ts business and established an account with the state Department of Revenue and other state agencies as may be required by the Contractor’s business, and has obtained a Unified Business Identifier (UBI) number from the State of Washington. 8.F.a Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: DTI Contract (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 3 (Over $20K with Performance Bond) F. The Contractor has a valid contractor registration pursuant to Ch. 18.27 RCW or an electrical contractor license pursuant to Ch. 19.28 RCW. G. The Contractor maintains a set of books dedicated to the expenses and earnings of its business. V. TERMINATION. The City may terminate this Agreement for good cause. “Good cause” shall include, without limitation, any one or more of the following events: A. The Contractor’s refusal or failure to supply a sufficient number of properly skilled workers or proper materials for completion of the Contract work. B. The Contractor’s failure to complete the work within the time specified in this Agreement. C. The Contractor’s failure to make full and prompt payment to subcontractors or for material or labor. D. The Contractor’s persistent disregard of federal, state or local laws, rules or regulations. E. The Contractor’s filing for bankruptcy or becoming adjudged bankrupt. F. The Contractor’s breach of any portion of this Agreement. If the City terminates this Agreemen t for good cause, the Contractor shall not receive any further money due under this Agreement until the Contract work is completed. After termination, the City may take possession of all records and data within the Contractor’s possession pertaining to th is project which may be used by the City without restriction. VI. PREVAILING WAGES. The Contractor shall file a “Statement of Intent to Pay Prevailing Wages,” with the State of Washington Department of Labor & Industries prior to commencing the Contract work. The Contractor shall pay prevailing wages in effect on the date the bid is accepted or executed by the Contractor, and comply with Chapter 39.12 of the Revised Code of Washington, as well as any other applicable prevailing wage rate provisions. The latest prevailing wage rate revision issued by the Department of Labor and Industries is attached. VII. CHANGES. The City may issue a written change order for any change in the Contract work during the performance of this Agreement. If the Contractor determines, for any reason, that a change order is necessary, the Contractor must submit a written change order request to the person listed in the notice provision section of this Agreement, Section XV I(D), within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date the Contractor knew or should have known of the facts and events giving rise to the requested change. If the City determines that the change increases or decreases the Contractor's costs or time for perf ormance, the City will make an equitable adjustment. The City will attempt, in good faith, to reach agreement with the Contractor on all equitable adjustments. However, if the parties are unable to agree, the City will determine the equitable adjustment as it deems appropriate. The Contractor shall proceed with the change order work upon receiving either a written change order from the City or an oral order from the City before actually receiving the written change order. If the Contractor fails to requ ire a change order within the time specified in this paragraph, the Contractor waives its right to make any claim or submit subsequent change order requests for that portion of the contract work. If the Contractor disagrees with the equitable adjustment, the Contractor must complete the change order work; however, the Contractor may elect to protest the adjustment as provided in subsections A through E of Section IX, Claims, below. The Contractor accepts all requirements of a change order by: (1) endorsing it, (2) writing a separate acceptance, or (3) not protesting in the way this section provides. A change order that is accepted by the Contractor as provided in this section shall constitute full payment and final settlement of all claims for contract time and for direct, indirect and consequential costs, including costs of delays related to any work, either covered or affected by the change. 8.F.a Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: DTI Contract (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 4 (Over $20K with Performance Bond) VIII. FORCE MAJEURE . Neither party shall be liable to the other for breach due to delay or failure in performance resulting from acts of God, acts of war or of the public enemy, riots, pandemic, fire, flood, or other natural disaster or acts of government (“force majeure event”). Performance that is prevented or delayed due to a force majeure event shall not result in liability to the delayed party. Both parties represent to the other that at the time of signing this Agreement, they are able to perform as required and their performance will no t be prevented, hindered, or delayed by the current COVID -19 pandemic, any existing state or national declarations of emergency, or any current social distancing restrictions or personal protective equipment requirements that may be required under federal, state, or local law in response to the current pandemic. If any future performance is prevented or delayed by a force majeure event, the party whose performance is prevented or delayed shall promptly notify the other party of the existence and nature of the force majeure event causing the prevention or delay in performance. Any excuse from liability shall be effective only to the extent and duration of the force majeure event causing the prevention or delay in performance and, provided, that the party prevented or delayed has not caused such event to occur and continues to use diligent, good faith efforts to avoid the effects of such event and to perform the obligation. Notwithstanding other provisions of this section, the Contractor shall not be entitled t o, and the City shall not be liable for, the payment of any part of the contract price during a force majeure event , or any costs, losses, expenses, damages, or delay costs incurred by the Contractor due to a force majeure event. Performance that is more costly due to a force majeure event is not included within the scope of this Force Majeure provision. If a force majeure event occurs, the City may direct the Contractor to restart any work or performance that may have ceased, to change the work, or to take other action to secure the work or the project site during the force majeure event. The cost to restart, change, or secure the work or project site arising from a direction by the City under this clause will be dealt with as a change order, except to the extent that the loss or damage has been caused or exacerbated by the failure of the Contractor to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement. Except as expressly contemplated by this section, all other costs will be borne by the Contractor, IX. CLAIMS. If the Contractor disagrees with anything required by a change order, another written order, or an oral order from the City, including any direction, instruction, interpretation, or determination by the City, the Contractor m ay file a claim as provided in this section. The Contractor shall give written notice to the City of all claims within fourteen (14) calendar days of the occurrence of the events giving rise to the claims, or within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date the Contractor knew or should have known of the facts or events giving rise to the claim, whichever occurs first . Any claim for damages, additional payment for any reason, or extension of time, whether under this Agreement or otherwise, shall be conclusively deemed to have been waived by the Contractor unless a timely written claim is made in strict accordance with the applicable provisions of this Agreement. At a minimum, a Contractor's written claim shall include the information set forth in subsecti ons A, items 1 through 5 below. FAILURE TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE, WRITTEN NOTIFICATION OF CLAIM WITHIN THE TIME ALLOWED SHALL BE AN ABSOLUTE WAIVER OF ANY CLAIMS ARISING IN ANY WAY FROM THE FACTS OR EVENTS SURROUNDING THAT CLAIM OR CAUSED BY THAT DELAY. A. Notice of Claim . Provide a signed written notice of claim that provides the following information: 1. The date of the Contractor's claim; 2. The nature and circumstances that caused the claim; 3. The provisions in this Agreement that support the claim; 4. The estimated dollar cost, if any, of the claimed work and how that estimate was determined; and 8.F.a Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: DTI Contract (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 5 (Over $20K with Performance Bond) 5. An analysis of the progress schedule showing the schedule change or disruption if the Contractor is asserting a schedule change or disruption. B. Records. The Contractor shall keep complete records of extra costs and time incurred as a result of the asserted events giving rise to the claim. The City shall have access to any of the Contractor's records needed for evaluating the protest. The City will evaluate all claims, provided the procedures in this section are followed. If the City determines that a claim is valid, the City will adjust payment for work or time by an equitable adjustment. No adjustment will be made for an invalid protest. C. Contractor's Duty to Complete Protested Work. In spite of any claim, the Contractor shall proceed promptly to provide the goods, materials and services required by the City under this Agreement. D. Failure to Protest Constitutes Waiver. By not protestin g as this section provides, the Contractor also waives any additional entitlement and accepts from the City any written or oral order (including directions, instructions, interpretations, and determination). E. Failure to Follow Procedures Constitutes Wai ver. By failing to follow the procedures of this section, the Contractor completely waives any claims for protested work and accepts from the City any written or oral order (including directions, instructions, interpretations, and determination). X. LIMI TATION OF ACTIONS. CONTRACTOR MUST, IN ANY EVENT, FILE ANY LAWSUIT ARISING FROM OR CONNECTED WITH THIS AGREEMENT WITHIN 120 CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE DATE THE CONTRACT WORK IS COMPLETE OR CONTRACTOR’S ABILITY TO FILE THAT CLAIM OR SUIT SHALL BE FOREVER BARRED. THIS SECTION FURTHER LIMITS ANY APPLICABLE STATUTORY LIMITATIONS PERIOD. XI. WARRANTY. The Contractor warrants that it will faithfully and satisfactorily perform all work provided under this Agreement in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. The Contractor shall promptly correct all defects in workmanship and materials: (1) when the Contractor knows or should have known of the defect, or (2) upon the Contractor’s receipt of notification from the City of the existence or discovery of the defect. In the event any parts are repaired or replaced, only original replacement parts shall be used —rebuilt or used parts will not be acceptable. When defects are corrected, the warranty for that portion of the work shall extend for an additional year beyond the original warranty period applicable to the overall work. The Contractor shall begin to correct any defects within seven (7) calendar days of its receipt of notice from the City of the defect. If the Contractor does not accomplish the corrections within a reasonable time as determined by the City, the City may complete the corrections and the Contra ctor shall pay all costs incurred by the City in order to accomplish the correction. XII. DISCRIMINATION. In the hiring of employees for the performance of work under this Agreement or any sub -contract, the Contractor, its sub -contractors, or any person acting on behalf of the Contractor or sub -contractor shall not, by reason of race, religion, color, sex, age, sexual orientation, national origin, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability, discriminate against any person who is qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates. The Contractor shall execute the attached City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Policy Declaration, Comply with City Administrative Policy 1.2, and upon completion of the contr act work, file the attached Compliance Statement. XII I. INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the Contractor's performance of this Agreement, except for that portion of the injuries and damages caused by the City's negligence. 8.F.a Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: DTI Contract (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 6 (Over $20K with Performance Bond) The City's inspection or acceptance of any of the Contractor's work when completed shall not be grounds to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Contractor and the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers, the Contractor's duty to defend, indemnify, and hold the City harmless, and the Contractor’s liability accruing from that obligation shall be only to the extent of the Contractor's negligence. IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE INDEMNIFICATION PROVIDED HEREIN CONSTITUTES THE CONTRACTOR'S WAIVER OF IMMUNITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE, TITLE 51 RCW, SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS INDEMNIFICATION. THE PARTIES FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED THIS WAIVER. In the event the Contractor refuses tender of defense in any suit or any claim, if that tender was made pursuant to this indemnification clause, and if that refusal is subsequently determined by a court having jurisdiction (or other agreed tribunal) to have been a wrongful refusal on the Contractor’s part, then the Contractor shall pay all the City’s costs for defense, including all reasonable expert witness fees and reasonable attorneys’ fees, plus the City’s legal costs and fees incurred because there was a wrongful refusal on the Contractor’s part. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. XIV. INSURANCE. The Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance of the types and in the amounts described in Exhibit B attached and incorporated by this reference. XV. WORK PERFORMED AT CONTRACTOR'S RISK. The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and subcontractors in the performance of the contract work and shall utilize all protection necessary for that purpose. All work shall be done at the Contractor's own risk, and the Contractor shall be responsible for any loss of or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in connection with the work. XVI. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. A. Recyclable Materials. Pursuant to Chapter 3.80 of the Kent City Code, the City requires its contractors and consultants to use recycled and recyclable products when ever practicable. A price preference may be available for any designated recycled product. B. Non-Waiver of Breach. The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, or to ex ercise any option conferred by this Agreement in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of those covenants, agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect. C. Resolution of Disputes and Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. If the parties are unable to settle any dispute, difference or claim arising from the parties’ performance of this Agree ment, the exclusive means of resolving that dispute, difference or claim, shall only be by filing suit exclusively under the venue, rules and jurisdiction of the King County Superior Court, King County, Washington, unless the parties agree in writing to an alternative dispute resolution process. In any claim or lawsuit for damages arising from the parties' performance of this Agreement, each party shall pay all its legal costs and attorney's fees incurred in defending or bringing such claim or lawsuit, including all appeals, in addition to any other recovery or award provided by law; provided , however, nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit the City's right to indemnification under Section X III of this Agreement. D. Written Notice. All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the parties at the addresses listed on the signature page of the Agreement, unless notified to the contrary. Any written notice hereunder shall become effective three (3) business days after the date of mailing by registered or 8.F.a Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: DTI Contract (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 7 (Over $20K with Performance Bond) certified mail, and shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing. E. Assignment . Any assignment of this Agreement by either party without the written consent of the non-assigning party shall be void. If the non -assigning party gives its consent to any assignment, the terms of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and no further assignm ent shall be made without additional written consent. F. Modification. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the City and the Contractor. G. Entire Agreement . The written provisions and terms of this Agreement, together with any Exhibits attached hereto, shall supersede all prior verbal statements of any officer or other representative of the City, and such statements shall no t be effective or be construed as entering into or forming a part of or altering in any manner this Agreement. All of the above documents are hereby made a part of this Agreement. However, should any language in any of the Exhibits to this Agreement conf lict with any language contained in this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. H. Compliance with Laws. The Contractor agrees to comply with all federal, state, and municipal laws, rules, and regulations that are now effective or in the future become applicable to the Contractor's business, equipment, and personnel engaged in operations covered by this Agreement or accruing out of the performance of those operations. I. Public Records Act . The Contractor acknowledges that the City is a public agency subject to the Public Records Act codified in Chapter 42.56 of the Revised Code of Washington and documents, notes, emails, and other records prepared or gathered by the Contractor in its performance of this Agreement may be subject to public review and disclosure, even if those records are not produced to or possessed by the City of Kent . As such, the Contractor agrees to cooperate fully with the City in satisfying the City’s duties and obligations under the Public Records Act. J. City Business License Required . Prior to commencing the tasks described in Section I, the Contractor agrees to provide proof of a current city of Kent business license pursuant to Chapter 5.01 of the Kent City Code. K. Counterparts and Signatures by Fax or Emai l. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, and all of which will together constitute this one Agreement. Further, upon executing this Agreement, either party may deliver the signature page to the other by fax or email and that signature shall have the same force and effect as if the Agreement bearing the original signature was received in person. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / IN WITNESS, the parties below execute this Agreement, which shall become effective on the last date entered below. All acts consistent with the authority of this Agreement and prior to 8.F.a Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: DTI Contract (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 8 (Over $20K with Performance Bond) its effective date are ratified and affirmed, and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to have applied. CONTRACTOR : By: _______________________________ Print Name: ________________________ Its: _______________________________ DATE: _____________________________ CITY OF KENT: By: ______________________________ Print Name: Dana Ralph _____________ Its: Mayor _________________ DATE: ____________________________ NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: CONTRACTOR: Kevin Christensen Christensen, Inc., General Contractor 2840 Crites St SW, Suite 100 Tumwater, WA 98512 (360) 709-0330 (telephone) (360) 709-0220 (facsimile) NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: CITY OF KENT: Diana Lazouski City of Kent 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 (253) 856-5083 (telephone) (253) 856-6080 (facsimile) APPROVED AS TO FORM: _______________________________________ Kent Law Department ATTEST: _______________________________________ Kent City Clerk [In this field, you may enter the electronic filepath where the contract has been saved] 8.F.a Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: DTI Contract (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 1 DECLARATION CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY The City of Kent is committed to conform to Federal and State laws regarding equal opportunity. As such all contractors, subcontractors and suppliers who perform work with relation to this Agreement shall comply with the regulations of the City’s equal employment opportunity policies. The following questions specifically identify the requirements the City deems necessary for any contractor, subcontractor or supplier on this specific Agreement to adhere to. An affirmative response is required on all of the following questions for this Agreement to be valid and binding. If any contractor, subcontractor or supplier willfully misrepresents themselves with regard to the directives outlines, it will be considered a breach of contract and it will be at the City’s sole determination regarding suspension or termination for all or part of the Ag reement; The questions are as follows: 1. I have read the attached City of Kent administrative policy number 1.2. 2. During the time of this Agreement I will not discriminate in employment on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, age, or the presence of all sensory, mental or physical disability. 3. During the time of this Agreement the prime contractor will provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer. 4. During the time of the Agreement I, the prime contractor, will actively consider hiring and promotion of women and minorities. 5. Before acceptance of this Agreement, an adherence statement will be signed by me, the Prime Contractor, that the Prime Contractor complied wit h the requirements as set forth above. By signing below, I agree to fulfill the five requirements referenced above. By: _________________________________________ For:_________________________________________ Title: ________________________________________ Date: _______________________________________ 8.F.a Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: DTI Contract (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 2 CITY OF KENT ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY NUMBER: 1.2 EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 1998 SUBJECT: MINORITY AND WOMEN SUPERSEDES: April 1, 1996 CONTRACTORS APPROVED BY Jim White, Mayor POLICY: Equal employment opportunity requirements for the City of Kent will conform to federal and state laws. All contractors, subcontractors, consu ltants and suppliers of the City must guarantee equal employment opportunity within their organization and, if holding Agreements with the City amounting to $10,000 or more within any given year, must take the following affirmative steps: 1. Provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer. 2. Actively consider for promotion and advancement available minorities and women. Any contractor, subcontractor, consultant or supplier who willfully disregards the City’s nondiscrimination and equal opportunity requirements shall be considered in breach of contract and subject to suspension or termination for all or part of the Agreement. Contract Compliance Officers will be appointed by the Directors of Planning, Parks, and Public Works Departments to assume the following duties for their respective departments. 1. Ensuring that contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and suppliers subject to these regulations are familiar with the regulations and the City’s equal employment opportunity policy. 2. Monitoring to assure adherence to federal, state and local laws, policies and guidelines. 8.F.a Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: DTI Contract (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 3 CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMPLIANCE STATEMENT This form shall be filled out AFTER COMPLETION of this project by the Contractor awarded the Agreement. I, the undersigned, a duly represented agent of Company, hereby acknowledge and declare that the before -mentioned company was the prime contractor for the Agreement known as that was entered into on the (date), between the firm I represent and the City of Kent. I declare that I complied fully with all of the requirements and obligations as outlined in the City of Kent Administrative Policy 1.2 and the Declaration City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Policy that was part of the before -mentioned Agreement. By: _________________________________________ For:_________________________________________ Title: ________________________________________ Date: _______________________________________ 8.F.a Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: DTI Contract (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) BIDDER RESPONSIBILITY CRITERIA - 1 BIDDER RESPONSIBILITY CRITERIA Certification of Compliance with Wage Payment Statutes This certification is required by state law (RCW 39.04.350(2)) to be submitted to the City before the contract can be awarded. The bidder hereby certifies that, within the three-year period immediately preceding the bid solicitation date (Insert Date), the bidder is not a “willful” violator, as defined in RCW 49.48.082, of any provision of chapters 49.46, 49.48, or 49.52 RCW, as determined by a final and binding citation and notice of assessment issued by the Department of Labor and Industries or through a civil judgment entered by a court of limited or general jurisdiction. I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. Insert Bidder's Business Name By: _________________________________________ Signature of Authorized Official* Printed Name: _________________________________ Title: ________________________________________ Date: _______________________________________ City and State: ________________________________ *If a corporation, proposal must be executed in the corporate name by the president or vice - president (or any other corporate officer accompanied by evidence of authority to sign). If a co - partnership, proposal must be executed by a partner. 8.F.a Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: DTI Contract (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) CITY OF KENT KING COUNTY, WASHTNGTON City of Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement CENTENNIAL CENTER - THIRD FLOOR 4OO WEST GOWE STREET, KENT WA BIDS ACCEPTED UNTIL October L,2O2L 2:OO P.M. DELIVER TO Nathen HarPer Project Coordinator City of Kent Facilities / Parks Recreation & Community Services 4OO West Gowe Street, Kent, WA 98032 KENT WasxrNcroN BIDDER'S NAMEChristensen lnc. General Contractor 8.F.b Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) . t t+.,? u Ctrristensen Inc. GENERAL CONTRACTOR z84o crites st. sw, suite roo llllHXlil#*,iBr"l2n".r"."?loe-o33o FAX 36o-7oe-ozzo Order of Contents - City of Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement . Bid Cover Sheet . Order of Contents . Invitation to Bid . Information for Bidders . Contractors Qualification Statement . Bidder's Checklist . Proposal . Subcontractor List . Contractor Compliance Statement . Declaration - City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Policy . AdministrativePolicy . Statement that Bidder Has Not Been Disqualified . Certification of Compliance with Wage Payment Statutes r Proposal Signature Page . Combined Declaration Form . Change Order Form (Example) . Payment and Performance Bond . Contract o References . Bid Bond 8.F.b Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) INVITATION TO BID Notice is hereby given that the City of Kent, Washington, will receive sealed bids at the City of Kent's Facility office,400 West Gowe Street, Kent Washington through October 1,2021up to 2:00 p.m.. All bids must be properly marked and sealed in accordance with the "Invitation to Bid." Bids must be delivered and received at the City of Kent's Facility office by the above-stated time, regardless of delivery method, including U.S. Mail. Bidders shall call Nate Harper at (253) 856-5082 to drop off bids. This project involves an interior remodel on the 3'd floor of the existing Centennial Center. The scope of work selective demolition of designated walls and flooring. Construction of a new wall, new flooring (carpet tile and VCT), paint, and electrical modifications The Engineer's estimated range for this project is approximately ($130,000). Bid documents may be obtained by contacting Kevin Broderick at Broderick Architects, (206) 682-7525 I kevin@broderickarchitects.com. For technical questions, please call Kevin Broderick at Broderick Architects, (206) 682-7 525. Each bid shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications and other contract documents now on file in City of Kent Parks Facilities. Copies of the plans and Special Provisions may be purchases at a non-refundable cost of $45.00 for each set. Plans and specifications can also be downloaded at no charge by contacting the Architect. There will be a walk-through at 10 AJVI. on Thursday, September 16,2021for General Contractors and Sub-Contractors, at the Centennial Centerr 400 West Gowe Street, Kent 98032. biil, The City of Kent reserves the right to reject any and all bids on any or all schedules or alternates or to waive any informalities in the bidding and shall determine which bid or bidders is the most responsive, satisfactory, and responsible bidder and shall be the sole judge thereof. No bidder may withdraw hislher bid for a period of sixty (60) days after the day of bid opening. 8.F.b Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) 1 INFORMATION FOR BIDDERS Bidders shall be qualified by ability, experience, financing, equipment, and organization to do the work called for in the Contract Documents, The City reserves the right to take whatever action it deems necessary to ascertain the ability of the Bidder to perform the work satisfactorily. This action includes the City's review of the qualification information in the bid documents. The City will use this qualification data in its decision to determine whether the lowest responsive bidder is also responsible and able to perform the contract work. If the City determines that the lowest bidder is not the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, the City reserves its unqualified right to reject that bid and award the contract to the next lowest bidder that the City, in its soled judgment, determines is also responsible and able to perform the contract work (the "lowest responsive and responsible bidder"). All blanks in the proposal forms must be appropriately filled in. Proposal must contain original signature pages. Facsimiles are not acceptable and are considered non-responsive submittals. All bids must be sealed and delivered in accordance with the "Invitation to Bid." Bids must be received at the City of Kent Facilities office by the stated time, regardless of delivery method, including U.S. Mail' The City also reserves the right to include or omit any or all schedules or alternates of the Proposal and will award the contract to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder based on the total bid amount, including schedules or alternates selected by the City. A bidder who wished to claim error after the Bids have been opened and tabulated shall submit a notarized affidavit signed by the Bidder, accompanied by original work sheets used in the preparation of the Bid, requesting relief from the responsibilities of Award. The affidavit shall describe the specific error(s) and certify that the work sheets are the originals used in the preparation of the Bid. The affidavit and the work sheets shall be submitted to the Project Manager no later than 5:00 p.m. on the first business day after Bid opening, or the claim will not be considered. The Architect will review the certified work sheets to determine validity of the claimed error, and make a recommendation to the City. If the City concurs in the claim of error, the Bidder will be relieved of responsibility, and the Bid Deposit of the Bidder will be returned. Thereafter, at the discretion of the City, all Bids may be rejected or award made to the next lowest responsive, responsible Bidder. The form of contract that the successful bidder, as the Contractor, will be required to execute, and the forms and the amount of surety bonds that it will 2 3 4 5 8.F.b Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) be required to furnish at the time of execution of the contract are included in the bid documents and should be carefully examined, The contract and the Surety Bonds will be executed in two (2) original counterparts. Within 1O calendar days after the award date, the successful bidder shall return the signed City prepared contract, insurance certification as required by the contract, and a satisfactory bond as required by law. If the successful bidder fails to provide these documents within the l0-day period, the City ffidy, at its sole discretion, reduce the time for completion of the contract work by one calendar day for each calendar day after this l0-day period that the successful bidder fails to provide all required documents' Until the City executes a contract, no proposal shall bind the City nor shall any work begin within the project limits or within City-furnished sites. The Contractor shall bear all risks for any work begun outside such areas and for any materials ordered before the contract is executed by the City. No claim for delay shall be granted to the contractor due to his failure to submit the required documents to the City in accordance with this schedule. The "Payment and Performance Bond" shall remain in force for one year following the Kent City Council "Final Acceptance Date" of the project to ensure defects are corrected during the one-year guarantee period in compliance with WSDOT Section 1-05.10 (Guarantees), and the Performance Bond language of the contract, Any decision made by the City regarding the award and execution of the contract or bid rejection shall be conclusive subject to the scope of judicial review permitted under Washington State Law, Such review, if any, shall be timely filed in the Superior Court of King County, located in Kent, Washington. The Contractor shall include all costs of doing the work within the bid item prices. In the contract plans, contract provisions, addenda, or any other part of the contract require work that has no bid item price in the proposal form, the entire cost of labor and material required to perform the work shall be incidental and included with the bid item prices in the contract. Refer to the insurance requirements in the project contract, which constitute the Contractor's Insurance requirements for this project. 6 7 8 9 8.F.b Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) CoNTRACTOR'S QUALTFTCATTON STATEM ENT (RCW 39.04.350) THE CITY WILL REVIEW THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPON.SES TO THTS FORM TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE BIDDING CONTRACTOR 's; RESPONSIBLE TO PERFORM THE CONTRACT WORK. THIS FORM INCLUDES CRITERIA ESTABLISHED BY STATE LAW THAT MUST BE MET TO BE CONSIDERED A RESPOA'SIBLE BIDDER AND QUALIFIED TO BE AWARDED THIS PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT AS WELL AS S'IPPLEMENTAL CRITERIA ESTABLISHED BY THE CITY THAT ARE APPLICABLE TO THIS PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT. THE BIDDER SHOI'LD READ AND RESPOND TO THTS FORM CAREFULLY. Indicia of contractor's responsibility inherently involve subjective determinations as to the contractor's ability to perform and complete the contract work responsibly and to the owner city's satisfaction. The city has an obligation and a duty to its citizens and its taxpayers to administer its budgets and complete its projects in a businesslike manner. Accordingly, it has a duty to exercise the type of inquiry and discretion a business would conduct when selecting a contractor who will be responsible to perform the contract work. The city's supplemental criteria are based, in large part, on the qualification statement form used by the American Institute of Architects, The city provides these criteria so as to provide the most objective framework possible within which the city will make its decision regarding the bidder's ability to be responsible to perform the contract work. These criteria, taken together, will form the basis for the city's decision that a bidder is or is not responsible to perform the contract work. Any bidder may make a formal written request to the city to modify the criteria set forth in this qualification statement, but that request may only be made within 48 hours of the date and time that the bidder first obtains the bid documents or three (3) business days prior to the scheduled bid opening date, whichever occurs first. If the city receives a modification request, it will consider any information submitted in the request and will respond before the bid submittal deadline, If the city's evaluation results in changed criteria, the city will issue an addendum establishing the new or modified criteria. If the city determines that, based on the criteria established in this statement, a bidder is not responsible to perform the contract work, the city will provide written notice of its determination that will include the city's reason for its decision. The bidder has 24 hours from the time the city delivers written notice to the bidder that the bidder is not responsible to perform the contract work to appeal the city's determination. No appeals will be received after the expiration of this 24 hour appeal period. The city may deliver this notice by hand delivery, email, facsimile, or regular mail. In the event the city uses regular mail, the delivery will be deemed complete three days after being placed in the U.S. Mail. The bidder's right to appeal is limited to the single remedy of providing the city with additional information to be considered before the city issues a final determination. Bidder acknowledges and understands that, as provided by RCW 39.04.350, no other appeal is allowed and no other remedy of any kind or nature is available to the bidding contractor if the City determines that the bidder is not responsible to perform the contract work. 8.F.b Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) If the bidder fails to request a modification within the time allowed, or fails to appeal a determination that the bidder is not responsible within the time allowed, the city will make its determination of bidder responsibility based on the information submitted. COMPLETE AND STGfl THIS FORM AS PART OF YOUR BID. FAILURE TO PROPERLY COMPLETE THIS FORM MAY ALSO RESULT IN A DETERMINATION THAT YOUR BID IS NON.RESPONSIVE AND THEREFORE VOID. THIS DOCUMENT HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES: CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEY IS ENCOURAGED WITH RESPECT TO ITS COMPLETION OR MODIFICATION. The undersigned certifies under oath that the information provided herein is true and sufficiently complete so as not to be misleading. SUBMITTED BY:Christensen lne Genera I (lnnfrantnr NAME:.loe Presto ADDRESS:2840 Crites St SW Suite 100 Trrmwater WA 98512 PRINCIPAL OFFICE: ADDRESS: Tr rmwater WA 2840 Crites St SW Su lno Tr rmwater WA 98512 PHONE: FAX: (360) 709-O330 (360) 709-0330 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS - Per state law a bidder must meet the fol lowi ng responsi bi lity criteria 1. Required Responsibility Criteria 1.1 Provide a copy of your Department of Labor and Industries certificate of registration in compliance with chapter 18.27 RCW. AttachedL.2 Provide your current state unified business identifier number. 601-546-7651.3 Provide proof of applicable industrial insurance coverage for your employees working in Washington as required in Title 51 RCW, together with an employment security department number as required in Title 50 RCW, and a state excise tax registration number as required in Title 82 RCW, Providing a copy of a state of Washington "Master License Service Registration and Licenses" form is typically sufficient evidence of the requirements of this subsection. 1.4 Provide a statement, signed by a person with authority to act and speak for your company, that your company, including any subsidiary companies or affiliated companies under majority ownership or under control by the owners of the bidder's company, are not and have not 8.F.b Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) If the bidder fails to request a modification within the time allowed, or fails to appeal a determination that the bidder is not responsible within the time allowed, the city will make its determination of bidder responsibility based on the information submitted. COMPLETE AND STG'V THIS FORM AS PART OF YOUR BID. FAILURE TO PROPERLY COMPLETE THIS FORM MAY ALSO RESULT IN A DETERMINATION THAT YOUR BID IS 'VOAI.RESPONSIVE AND THEREFORE VOID. THIS DOCUMENT HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES: CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEY IS ENCOURAGED WITH RESPECT TO ITS COMPLETION OR MODIFICATION. The undersigned certifies under oath that the information provided herein is true and sufficiently complete so as not to be misleading, SUBMITTED BY: NAME: ADDRESS: Joe Presto - Christensen lnc. General Contractor 2840 Crites St SW Suite 100 Tumwater- WA 98512 PRINCIPAL OFFICE: ADDRESS: Tumwater, WA PHONE FAX: 2840 Crites St SW Suite 100 Tumwater. WA 98512 (360) 709-0330 (360) 709-0330 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS - Per state law a bidder must meet the following responsibility criteria 1. Required Responsibility Criteria 1.1 Provide a copy of your Department of Labor and Industries certificate of registration in compliance with chapter 18.27 RCW. AttachedL.2 Provide your current state unified business identifier number. 601-546-7651.3 Provide proof of applicable industrial insurance coverage for your employees working in Washington as required in Title 51 RCW, together with an employment security department number as required in Title 50 RCW, and a state excise tax registration number as required in Title 82 RCW, Providing a copy of a state of Washington "Master License Service Registration and Licenses" form is typically sufficient evidence of the requirements of this subsection, L.4 Provide a statement, signed by a person with authority to act and speak for your company, that your company, including any subsidiary companies or affiliated companies under majority ownership or under control by the owners of the bidder's company, are not and have not 8.F.b Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) been in the past three (3) years, disqualified from bidding on any public works contract under RCW 39.06,010 or 39.12.065 (3). Attached1.5 Provide a signed statement, signed under penalty of perjury by a person with authority to act and speak for your company, that within the three- year period immediately preceding the bid solicitation date, your company is not a "willful" violator as defined in RCW 49.48.082, of any provisions of chapters 49.46, 49.48, or 49.52 RCW, as determined by a final and binding citation and notice of assessment issued by the Department of Labor and Industries or through a civil judgment entered by a court of limited or general jurisdiction. Attached1.6 Provide proof that a designated person or persons with your company has either received training from the department of labor and industries or an approved training provider on the requirements related to public works and prevailing wages under chapter 39.04 RCW and 39.12 RCW or provide proof that your company has completed three or more public works projects and have had a valid business license in Washington for three or more years and are exempt from this training requirement. suppLEMENrAL cRrrERi[a:hE3t"oli"hed by the city to determine bidder responsibility ORGANIZATION 2.L How many years has your organization been in business as a Contractor? 27 2.2 How many years has your organization been in business under its present business name? 272.2.L Under what other or former names has your organization operated? N/A 2.3 If your organization is a corporation, answer the following: 2 2.4 If your organization is a partnership, answer the following: 2.3.1 2,3.2 2.3.3 2.3.4 2.3.s 2.3.6 2.4.L 2.4.2 2.4.3 Date of incorporation: 61211994 State of incorporation: WA President's name: KevinChristensen Vice-president's name(s): Reid Christensen and Colin Christensen Secretary'S name: BarbaraChritensen Treasurer's name: Date of organization: Type of partnership (if applicable): Name(s) of general partner(s): 2.5 If your organization is individually owned, answer the following: 2.5.1 Date of organization: 2.5.2 Name of owner: 8.F.b Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) 2.6 If the form of your organization is other than those listed above, describe it and name the principals: 3. LICENSING 3.1 List jurisdictions and trade categories in which your organization is legally qualified to do business, and indicate license numbers, if applicable, Construction - CH RlSlG066LB 3.2 List jurisdictions in which your organization's partnership or trade name is filed. Construction 4, EXPERIENCE 4.1 List the cateoories of work that your orqanization normally performs with its own force-s. D"Tg,framing, siding, roofing, concrete, finish Work, and- metal buidling erection. 4.2 Claims and Suits. (If the answer to any of the questions below is yes, please attach details.) 4.2.L Has your organization ever failed to complete any work awarded to it? No4.2.2 Are there any judgments, claims, arbitration proceedings or suits pending or outstanding against your organization or its officers? p6 4.2.3 Has your organization filed any law suits or requested arbitration with regard to construction contracts within the last five years? No 4.3 Within the last five years, has any officer or principal of your organization ever been an officer or principal of another organization when it failed to complete a construction contract? (If the answer is yes, please attach details.) No 4.4 On a separate sheet, list major construction projects your organization has in progress, giving the name of project, owner, architect or design engineer, contract amount, percent complete and scheduled completion date, 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.4.L State total worth of work in progress and under contract: 31.3 Mil On a separate sheet, list the major projects your organization has completed in the past five years, giving the name of project, owner, architect or design engineer, contract amount, date of completion and percentage of the cost of the work performed with your own forces. Attached4.5.1 State average annual amount of construction work performed during the past five years: 17 Mil On a separate sheet, list the construction experience and present commitments of the key individuals of your organization. Attached On a separate sheet, list your major equipment. Manlift and Forklift 5. REFERENCES 8.F.b Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) 6. 5.1 Trade References; Ketola/Targus Painting - 360-456-1224 5.2 Bank References: TwinStar Credit Union - Alexis Alverson 360-923-4450 5.3 Surety: 5,3.1 Name of bonding company: Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America 5.3.2 Name and address of agent:Tiffany Karpavicius 1802 Black Lake Blvd SW, Suite 301 FINANCING OlymPia, WA 98512 6.1 FinancialStatement. After bid opening, the City may require the following financial information from any of the three apparent low bidders. If so required, the selected bidder(s) must respond with this financial information within 24 hours of the City's request for that information. The City's request for this information shall not be construed as an award or as an intent to award the contract, A bidder's failure or refusal to provide this information may result in rejection of that bidder's bid. 6.1.1 Attach a financial statement, preferably audited, including your organization's latest balance sheet and income statement showing the following items: Current Assets (e.9., cash, joint venture accounts, accounts receivable, notes receivable, accrued income, deposits, materials inventory and prepaid expenses); Net Fixed Assets; Other Assets; Current Liabilities (e.9., accounts payable, notes payable, accrued expenses, provision for income taxes, advances, accrued salaries and accrued payroll taxes); Other Liabilities (e.9., capital, capital stock, authorized and outstanding shares par values, earned surplus and retained earnings). 6.1,.2 Name and address of firm preparing attached financial statement, and date thereof: 6.1.3 Is the attached financial statement for the identical organization named on page one? 6.1.4 If not, explain the relationship and financial responsibility of the organization whose financial statement is provided (e.9., parent- subsidiary). 6.2 Will the organization whose financial statement is attached act as guarantor of the contract for construction? 8.F.b Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) 7. SIGNATURE 7.L Dated at this 1 day of October ,202L. Name of Organization : Christensen lnc. G eral Contractor By: Title: 5oe, \rrsc g duly sworn, deposes and says that the. bein information provided herein is true and sufficiently complete so as not to be misleading. 7.2 Subscribed and sworn before e this l_day of 1 tll 202 a ilt HNotary Public: My Commission Expires: a. r$rllll IttyComrn. Exires June 5, 20b3 t'to20O4A L o 8.F.b Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) BIDDER'S CHECKLIST The following checklist is a guideline to help the Contractor make sure all forms are complete. The bidder's attention is especially called to the following forms. Failure to execute these forms as required may result in rejection of any bid. Bidder's Package should include the followingl Bid Document Cover Sheet filled out with Bidder's Name..... Order of Contents........... Invitation to Bid Information for Bidders.. Contractor's Qual ification Statement............. Complete and notarized Bidder's Checklist Proposal First line of proposal - filled in........... Unit prices are correct... Subcontractor List (contracts over $IOOK)... Subcontractors listed properly Signature ............ Contractor Compliance Statement Date Have/have not participated acknowledgment.........'. Signature and address Declaration - City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Policy........ Date and signature......,. Administrative Policy Statement that Bidder Has Not Been Disqualified......... Certification of Compliance with Wage Payment Statutes Proposal Signature Page All Addenda acknowledged Date, signature and address......... Combined Declaration Form Signature ........... Change Order Form (Example) ............ Payment and Performance Bond Contract The following forms are to be executed after the Contract is awarded:A) CONTMCT This agreement is to be executed by the successful bidder. B) PAYMENTAND PERFORMANCE BOND To be executed by the successful bidder and its surety company. The following form is to be executed after the Contract is completed:A) CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMPLIANCE STATEMENT To be executed by the successful bidder AFTER COMPLETION of this contract. tr tr t] tr tr tr tr tr tr tr tr tr tr tr tr tr tr tr tr tr tr tr E] tr tr tr tr tr tr tr To be executed by the successful bidder AFTER COMPLETION of this contract. 8.F.b Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) * BID PROPOSAL City of Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Centennial Center - Third Floor 4OO West Gowe Street, Kent WA Proposal of (hereinafter called the "Bidder"), organized and existing under the laws of the State of Washington and doing business as n aco n a paftners p or "an individual") To the OWNER (City of Kent): In compliance with your Invitation to Bid, the Bidder hereby proposes to furnish all labor and materials specified herein necessary for and incidental to the completion of the work in strict accordance with the Contract Documents, within the time set forth herein, and at the lump sum price stated below (not including WSST). LUMP SUM BASE BID: Provide all labor and materials required for the CITY OF KENT POLICE DETECTIVES TENANT IMPROVEMENT, AS ShOWN ON thc drawings and as specified in the project manual for the lump sum price (which does not include Washington State Sales Taxes (WSST)). Provide an accompanying Schedule of Values broken down by CSI Division oN{ l/*nJnuJ *X*ra") Dorars $DI oo Il"Ilt^.e, Flur,r "c, u^A (Amount in numbers)un- B WITHDRAWAL OF BID: No bidder may withdraw his/her bid for a period of sixty (60) calendar days after the day of bid opening, C. STATE SALES TAXI The undersigned agrees that the above named Lump Sum and Bid Alternate do not include Washington State and local sales taxes (WSST). WSST will be paid to the Contractor with each pay application. OVERHEAD AND PROFIT: The undersigned agrees that the above Bids do include overhead, profit, and all other expenses involved. COMMENCEMENT OF WORK: The bidder hereby agrees to commence work under this contract within five (5) calendar days after the Notice to Proceed and to fully complete the work within the time established in paragraph C of this proposal. BID SECURITY: Bid security is required for this project. A Performance and Payment bond will be required of the successful bidder. A D E F 8.F.b Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) G H ADDRESS: Notice of acceptance of this bid or request for additional information shall be addressed to the undersigned at the address stated below. SELECTION CRITERIA: This bid is being made in accordance with the Owner's procedures and shall be evaluated as follows: L Responsiveness. The Owner will consider all material submitted by the contractor to determine whether the Contractor's proposal is in compliance with the invitation to bid, 2. Responsibility, The Owner will consider all material submitted by the contractor, and other evidence it may obtain otherwise, to determine whether the contractor is capable of and has a history of successful ly completing contracts of this type. The following elements may be given consideration by the Owner in determining whether a contractor is a responsible contractor: a) The ability, capacity and skill of the contractorto perform the contract and/or provide the service required; b) The character, integrity, reputation, judgment, experience and efficiency of the bidder; c) Whether the contractor can perform the contract and do so within the time specified; d) the quality of performance by the contractor on previous and similar contracts; e) The previous and existing compliance by the bidder with laws relating to the contract or services; and f) such other information as may be secured having bearing on the decision to award the contracts. When requested by the Owner, contractors shall furnish acceptable evidence of the contractor's ability to perform, such as firm commitments by subcontractors, equipment, supplies and facilities, and the contractor's ability to obtain the necessary personnel. Refusal to provide such information upon request may causethe bid to be rejected. 3. Lowest Bid: The lowest bid K SIGNATURE: By signing this Bid Proposal, the undersigned bidder agrees to submit all insurance documents, performance bonds, and signed contracts within ten (10) calendar days after City awards the Contract and be bound by allterms, requirements and representations listed in the bid documents whether set forth by the City or by the Bidder. The Bidder acknowledges the receipt of Addenda to the contract documents as follows: Addendum No. 1 o9l?11?o?1 2 10to1t?o21 Christensen lnc. General Contractor Bid Date Compa ny Name 2840 Crites St SW Suite 100 Address 1 bmitted By (Signature) 8.F.b Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) Address 2 (360) 709-0330 Joe Presto Submitted By (Printed Name) General Manaqer Title oroiadmin@cin eom E-mail address END OF BID PROPOSAL Telephone Number (360\709-0220 Fax Number 8.F.b Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) CITY OF KENT SUBCONTRACTOR LIST (Contracts over $ 100,000) List each subcontractor, from any tier of subcontractors, that shall perform subcontract work amounting to more than 10olo of the total bid contract price, List each bid item to be performed by each designated subcontractor in numerical sequence, If no subcontractors will be performing LOo/o or more of the work, indicate this by writing "None" and signing this form at the bottom of the page. Failure to submit a fully completed and signed subcontractor list after the time set for bid opening may disqualify your bid, Project Name: Citv of Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Number: Subcontractor Name Item Numbers %eS Eu"AY;c^ Subcontractor Name Item Numbers Subcontractor Name Item Numbers Subcontractor Name Item Numbers Subcontractor Name Item Numbers Subcontractor Name Item Numbers Subcontractor Name Item Numbers CONTRACTOR'S SIGNATURE 8.F.b Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) CONTRACTOR COM PLIANCE STATEM ENT (President's Executive Order #11246) Da te 4nln4 l)19'l This statement relates to a proposed contract with the City of Kent named City of Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Number: I am the undersigned bidder or prospective contractor. I represent that - 1.IXX have,have not, participated in a previous contract or subcontract subject to the President's Executive Order #LL246 (regarding equal employment opportunity) or a preceding similar Executive Order. Christensen lnc. Genera I Contractor NAME OF BIDDER BY RE/TITLE .loe Presto. General na..ter 2840 Crites St SW Su 100 Tumwater. WA 98512 ADDRESS (Note to Bidders: The information required in this Compliance Statement is informational only) 8.F.b Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) DECLARATION CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY The City of Kent is committed to conform to Federal and State laws regarding equal opportunity. As such, all contractors, subcontractors and suppliers who perform work with relation to this contract shall comply with the regulations of the City's equal employment opportunity policies, The following questions specifically identify the requirements the City deems necessary for any contractor, subcontractor or supplier on this specific contract to adhere to, An affirmative response is required on all of the following questions for this contract to be valid and binding. If any contractor, subcontractor or supplier willfully misrepresents themselves with regard to the directives outlined, it will be considered a breach of contract and it will be at the City's sole determination regarding suspension or termination for all or part of the contract; The questions are as follows: 1. I have read the attached City of Kent administrative policy number 1,2, 2. During the time of this contract, I will not discriminate in employment on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, age, or the presence of all sensory, mental or physical disability. 3. During the time of this contract, the prime contractor will provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer, 4. During the time of the contract I, the prime contractor, will actively consider hiring and promotion of women and minorities. 5. Before acceptance of this contract, an adherence statement will be signed by me, the Prime Contractor, that the Prime Contractor complied with the requirements as set forth above, By signing below, I agree to fulfill the five requirements referenced above. Joe PrestoBy: For christensen nA"r^t ctor Title:General Manaoer Date 10to1t2021 8.F.b Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) DECLARATION CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY The City of Kent is committed to conform to Federal and State laws regarding equal opportunity. As such all contractors, subcontractors and suppliers who perform work with relation to this Agreement shall comply with the regulations of the City's equal employment opportunity policies. The following questions specifically identify the requirements the City deems necessary for any contractor, subcontractor or supplier on this specific Agreement to adhere to. An affirmative response is required on all of the following questions for this Agreement to be valid and binding, If any contractor, subcontractor or supplier willfully misrepresents themselves with regard to the directives outlines, it will be considered a breach of contract and it will be at the City's sole determination regarding suspension or termination for all or part of the Agreement; The questions are as follows: 1. I have read the attached City of Kent administrative policy number 1.2, 2 During the time of this Agreement I will not discriminate in employment on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, age, or the presence of all sensory, mental or physical disability. During the time of this Agreement the prime contractor will provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer. During the time of the Agreement I, the prime contractor, will actively consider hiring and promotion of women and minorities. Before acceptance of this Agreement, an adherence statement will be signed by me, the Prime Contractor, that the Prime Contractor complied with the requirements as set forth above. By signing below, I agree to fulfill the five requirements referenced above By: For: Title:General Manaoer Date : 1OlO1l2O21 3 4 5 EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 1 8.F.b Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) CITY OF KENT ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY NUMBER: L.2 EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 1998 SUBJECT:MINORITY AND WOMEN CONTRACTORS SUPERSEDES: April 1, t996 APPROVED BY Jim White, Mayor POLICY: Equal employment opportunity requirements for the City of Kent will conform to federal and state laws. All contractors, subcontractors, consultants and suppliers of the City must guarantee equal employment opportunity within their organization and, if holding contracts with the City amounting to $10,000 or more within any given year, must take the following affirmative steps: 1. Provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer. 2. Actively consider for promotion and advancement available minorities and women. Any contractor, subcontractor, consultant or supplier who willfully disregards the City's nondiscrimination and equal opportunity requirements shall be considered in breach of contract and subject to suspension or termination for all or paft of the contract. Contract Compliance Officers will be appointed by the Directors of Planning, Parks, and Public Works Departments to assume the following duties for their respective departments. 1. Ensuring that contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and suppliers subject to these regulations are familiar with the regulations and the City's equal employment opportunity policy, 2. Monitoring to assure adherence to federal, state and local laws, policies and guidelines. 8.F.b Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMPLIANCE STATEMENT This form shall be filled out AFTER COMPLETION of this project by the Contractor awarded the contract. I, the undersigned, a duly represented agent of Company, hereby acknowledge and declare that the before- mentioned company was the prime contractor for the contract known as g!$Lof Ken! Police Detectives Tenant Improvement, that was entered into on the (Da between the firm I represent and the City of Kent I declare that I complied fully with all of the requirements and obligations as outlined in the City of Kent Administrative Policy 1.2 and the Declaration City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Policy that was part of the before-mentioned contract. By: For: Title: Date ) 8.F.b Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) CITY OF KENT ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY NUMBER: L,2 EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 1998 SUBJECT MINORITY AND WOMEN CONTRACTORS SUPERSEDEST April 1, 1996 APPROVED BY Jim White, Mayor POLICY: Equal employment opportunity requirements for the City of Kent will conform to federal and state laws. All contractors, subcontractors, consultants and suppliers of the City must guarantee equal employment opportunity within their organization and, if holding Agreements with the City amounting to $10,000 or more within any given year, must take the following affirmative steps: 1. Provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer. 2. Actively consider for promotion and advancement available minorities and women. Any contractor, subcontractor, consultant or supplier who willfully disregards the City's nondiscrimination and equal opportunity requirements shall be considered in breach of contract and subject to suspension or termination for all or part of the Agreement, Contract Compliance Officers will be appointed by the Directors of Planning, Parks, and Public Works Departments to assume the following duties for their respective departments. 1. Ensuring that contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and suppliers subject to these regulations are familiar with the regulations and the City's equal employment oppoftunity policy. 2. Monitoring to assure adherence to federal, state and local laws, policies and guidelines' EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 2 8.F.b Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMPLIANCE STATEMENT This form shall be filled out AFTER COMPLETION of this project by the Contractor awarded the Agreement. I, the undersigned, a duly represented agent of Company, hereby acknowledge and declare that the before-mentioned company was the prime contractor for the Agreement known as that was entered into on the (date), between the firm I represent and the City of Kent I declare that I complied fully with all of the requirements and obligations as outlined in the City of Kent Administrative Policy 1.2 and the Declaration City of Kent Equal Employment Oppoftunity Policy that was part of the before-mentioned Agreement. Date: By: For Title: EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 3 8.F.b Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) BIDDER RESPONSIBILITY CRITERIA Statement that Bidder Has Not Been Disqualified This statement is required by state law (RCW 39.04.350(1)(f)) to be submitted to the City before the contract can be awarded. The bidder hereby certifies that, within the three-year period immediately preceding the bid solicitation date (October 1, 202L), the bidder has not been disqualified from bidding on any public works contract under RCW 39.06.010 or 39.12.065(3). Christensen lnc. General Contractor Bidder's iness Name ure of Authorized Officialx Joe Presto Printed Name General Manaoer Title 1010112021 Tumwater WA Date City State x If a corporationt proposal must be executed in the corporate name by the president or vice-president (or any other corporate officer accompanied by evidence of authority to sign). If a co-partnership, proposal must be executed by a partner. 8.F.b Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) BIDDER RESPONSIBILITY CRITERIA Certification of Compliance with Wage Payment Statutes This certification is required by state law (RCW 39.04.350(2)) to be submitted to the City before the contract can be awarded. The bidder hereby certifies that, within the three-year period immediately preceding the bid solicitation date October 1, ZOZL, the bidder is not a "willful" violator, as defined in RCW 49.48.082, of any provision of chapters 49.46, 49.48, or 49.52 RCW, as determined by a final and binding citation and notice of assessment issued by the Department of Labor and Industries or through a civil judgment entered by a court of limited or general jurisdiction. I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. Chriefencen lnn General nfnr Bidder's Business Name sig re of Authorized Officialx Joe Presto Printed Name General Manaqer Title WATumwater10t01t2021 Date City State * If a corporation, proposal must be executed in the corporate name by the president or vice-president (or any other corporate officer accompanied by evidence of authority to sign). If a co-partnership, proposal must be executed by a partner. 8.F.b Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) BIDDER RESPONSIBILITY CRITERIA Certification of Compliance with Wage Payment Statutes This certification is required by sfafe law (RCW 39.04.350(2)) to be submitted to the City before the contract can be awarded. The bidder hereby certifies that, within the three-year period immediately preceding the bid solicitation date (Insert Date), the bidder is not a "willful" violator, as defined in RCW 49'48.082' of any provision of chapters 49.46, 49.48, or 49.52 RCW, as determined by a final and binding citation and notice of assessment issued by the Department of Labor and Industries or through a civil judgment entered by a court of limited or general jurisdiction. I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct, Insert Bidder's Business Name By Si re Authorized Officialx Printed Name:Joe Presto Tifle : General Manaoer Date: 1010112021 City and State Tumwater, WA xlf a corporation, proposal must be executed in the corporate name by the president or vice- president (or any other corporate officer accompanied by evidence of authority to sign). If a co- partnership, proposal must be executed by a partner. BIDDER RESPONSIBILIry CRiTERIA - 1 8.F.b Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) PROPOSAL SIGNATURE PAGE The undersigned bidder hereby proposes and agrees to start construction work on the Contract, if awarded to him/her, on or before five (5) calendar days from the date of the Notice to Proceed, and agrees to complete the Contract within (9O) working days after issuance of the City's Notice to Proceed. The undersigned bidder hereby agrees to submit all insurance documents, performance bonds and signed contracts within ten (10) calendar days after City awards the Contract, The City anticipates issuance of the Notice to Proceed on the day of the preconstruction meeting. No bidder may withdraw his/her bid for a period of sixty (60) calendar days after the day of bid opening. Notice of acceptance of this bid or request for additional information shall be addressed to the undersigned at the address stated below. Receipt of Addendum No.'s 1 , -t -t to the plans and/or specifications is hereby acknowledged. Failure to acknowledge receipt of the addenda may be considered an irregularity in this proposal, By signing this Proposal Signature Page, the undersigned bidder agrees to accept all contract forms and documents included within the bid packet and to be bound by all terms, requirements and representations listed in the bid documents whether set forth by the City or by the Bidder. DATE: 1010112021 Christensen lnc G I Cnnfranfor NAME BI R re of Authorized Representative .loe Presto- General znzrlcf (Print Name and Title) 284O Crites St SW Su 1nn Address Tumwater. WA 98512 8.F.b Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) CITY OF KENT COMBINED DECLARATION FORM : NON-COLLUSTON, MTNTMUM WAGE NON.COLLUSION DECLARATION I, by signing the proposal, hereby declare, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the following statements are true and correct: That the undersigned person(s), firm, association or corporation has (have) not, either directly or indirectly, entered into any agreement' participated in any collusion, or otherwise taken any action in restraint of free competitive bidding in connection with the project for which this proposal is submitted. 2, That by signing the signature page of this proposal, I am deemed to have signed and to have agreed to the provisions of this declaration. AND MINIMUM WAGE AFFIDAVIT FORM I, the undersigned, having duly sworn, deposed, say and certify that in connection with the performance of the work of this project, I will pay each classification of laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the perlormance of such work not less than the prevailing rate of wage or not less than the minimum rate of wage as specified in the principal contract; that I have read the above and foregoing statement and certificate, know the contents thereof and the substance as set forth therein is true to my knowledge and belief. City of Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Number: 1 NAME OF PROJECT Christensen lnc. General Contractor NAME OF BIDDER'S FTRM TIVE OF BIDDERGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTA 8.F.b Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) CHANGE ORDER NO. IEnter # L, 2,3, etc.] NAME OF CONTRACTOR: ("Contractor") llnsert Company Name] CONTRACT NAME & PROJECT NUMBER: [Insert Name of Original Contract & Project #. if aoplicablel ORIGINAL CONTRACT DATE :llnsert Date Original Contract was Signedl This Change Order amends the above-referenced contract; all other provisions of the contract that are not inconsistent with this Change Order shall remain in effect. For valuable consideration and by mutual consent of the parties, the project contract is modified as follows: L section I of the Agreement, entitled "Description of Work," is hereby modified to add additional work or revise existing work as follows: In addition to work required under the original Agreement and any prior Amendments, Contractor shall provide all labor, materials, and equipment necessary to : flnsert detailed description of additional materials, services, etc., that are needed which necessitate this change order - Be as detailed as possible. You may also refer to an attached exhibit, but clearly identify the exhibit by title and datel 2. The contract amount and time for performance provisions of Section II "Time of Completion," and Section [II, "Compensation," are hereby modified as follows: Original Contract Sum, (including applicable alternates and WSST) $ Net Change by Previous Change Orders (incl. applicable WSST) $ Current Contract Amount (incl. Previous Change Orders) $ 8.F.b Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) Current Change Order $ Applicable WSST Tax on this Change Order $ Revised Contract Sum $ Original Time for Completion (insert date) Revised Time for Completion under prior Change Orders (insert date) Days Required (+) for this Change Order calendar days Revised Time for Completion (insert date) In accordance with Sections L-O4.4 and 1-04.5 of the Kent and WSDOT Standard Specifications, and Section VII of the Agreement, the Contractor accepts all requirements of this Change Order by signing below. Also, pursuant to the above- referenced contract, Contractor agrees to waive any protest it may have regarding this Change Order and acknowledges and accepts that this Change Order constitutes final settlement of all claims of any kind or nature arising from or connected with any work either covered or affected by this Change Order, including, without limitation, claims related to contract time, contract acceleration, onsite or home office overhead, or lost profits. This Change Order, unless otherwise provided, does not relieve the Contractor from strict compliance with the guarantee and warranty provisions of the original contract, particularly those pertaining to substantial completion date. All acts consistent with the authority of the Agreement, previous Change Orders (if any), and this Change Order, prior to the effective date of this Change Order, are hereby ratified and affirmed, and the terms of the Agreement, previous Change Orders (if any), and this Change Order shall be deemed to have applied. The parties whose names appear below swear under penalty of perjury that they are authorized to enter into this contract modification, which is binding on the pafties of this contract, 3. The Contractor will adjust the amount of its performance bond (if any) for this project to be consistent with the revised contract sum shown in section 2, above. 8.F.b Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) IN WITNESS, the parties below have executed this Agreement, which will become effective on the last date written below. CITY OF KENT: (signature) Print Name: (title) DATE: APPROVED AS TO FORM: (applicable if Mayor's signature required) Kent Law Department IIn this field, you may enter the electronic filepath where the contract has been saved] By I CONTRACTOR: Print Name: Its By (signature) (tide) DATE ATTEST: Kent City Clerk 8.F.b Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) KENT PAYMENT AND PERFORMANCE BOND TO CITY OF KENTWasHtNcrox KNOW ALL MEN BYTHESE PRESENTS: That we, the undersigned, as Principal, and a Corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Washington, as a Surety Corporation, and qualified under the laws of the State of Washington to become Surety upon bonds of Contractors with Municipal Corporations, as Surety, are jointly and severally held and firmly bound to the CITY OF KENT in the penal sum of , together with any adjustments, up or down, in the total contract price because of changes in the contract work, for the payment of which sum on demand we bind ourselves and our successors, heirs, administrators or personal representatives, as the case may be, This obligation is entered into in pursuance of the statutes of the State of Washington, and the Codes and Ordinances of the CITY OF KENT. Nevertheless, the conditions of the above obligation are such that: WHEREAS, under and pursuant to a motion, duly made, seconded and passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, King County, Washington, the Mayor of the City of Kent has let or is about to let to the above bounden Principal, a certain contract, the said contract providing for construction of City of Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement /Project Number: (which contract is referred to herein and is made a part hereof as though attached hereto), and WHEREAS, the Principal has accepted, or is about to accept, the contract, and undertake to perform the work therein provided for in the manner and within the time set forth: NOW, THEREFORE, for non-FHWA projects only, if the Principal shall faithfully perform all the'provisions of said contract in the manner and within the time herein set forth, or within such extensions of time as may be granted under the said contract, and shall pay all laborers, mechanics, subcontractors and material men, and all persons who shall supply the Principal or subcontractors with provisions and supplies for the carrying on of said work and shall indemnify and hold the CITY OF KENT harmless from any damage or expense by reason of failure of performance as specified in said contract or from defects appearing or developing in the material or workmanship provided or performed under said contract, then and in that event this obligation shall be void; but otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above bounden parties have executed this instrument under their separate seals. The name and corporate seal (if required by law) of each corporate party is hereto affixed and duly signed by its undersigned representatives pursuant to authority of its governing body, 8.F.b Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) TWO WITNESSES PRINCIPAL (enter principal's name above) TITLE DATE:DATE: CORPORATE SEAL: PRINT NAME DATE: SURETY CORPORATE SEAL: DATE: TITLE ADDRESS: CERTIFICATE AS TO CORPORATE SEAL I hereby certify that I am the (Assistant) Secretary of the Corporation named as Principal in the within Bond; that Who signed the said bond on behalf of the Principal of the said Corporation; that I know his signature thereto is genuine, and that said Bond was duly signed, sealed, and attested for and in behalf of said Corporation by authority of its governing body. SECRETARY OR ASSISTANT SECRETARY BY BY 8.F.b Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) KENT WASHI!6TOT PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT between City of Kent and IInsert Contractor's Company Name] THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the City of Kent, a Washington municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City"), and [Insert Contractor's Co. Name], organized under the laws of the State of [Insert State Company formed underl, located and doing business at flnsert Contractor's Address, Phone Number, and Contact Person], (hereinafter the "Contractor"). AGREEMENT The parties agree as follows: I. DESCRIPTION OF WORK. Contractor shall perform the following services for the City in accordance with the following described plans and/or specifications: [Insert detailed description of services contractor is providing. Be as detailed as possible. You may attach an exhibit so long as the exhibit is clearly referenced and identified by title and datel. The Contractor further represents that the services furnished under this Agreement will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices within the Puget Sound region in effect at the time such services are performed. II. TIME OF COMPLETION. The parties agree that work will begin on the tasks described in Section I above within [Insert # of days] [calendar or working] days after the City issues its Notice to Proceed. Upon the effective date of this Agreement, all physical work shall thereafter be completed fType either "within" or "by" depending on deadline in next form fieldl flnsert either a date specific or enter # of days, weeks, months, years, etc.l. The term of this Agreement shall continue until all work has been completed, final acceptance has occurred, and all Contractor obligations have been fulfilled. III. COMPENSATION. The City shall pay the Contractor a total amount not to exceed [Insert maximum dollar amount to be paid for services - Must be over $20K to use this form. You may type out the dollar amount and enter the numerical dollar amount in parentheses or you may just enter the numerical dollar amountl, including any applicable Washington State Sales Tax, for the work and services contemplated in this Agreement. The Contractor shall invoice the City monthly, The City will pay for the portion of the work described in the invoice that has been completed by the Contractor and approved by the City. The City's payment shall not constitute a waiver of the City's right to final inspection and acceptance of the project. Card Payment Program. The Contractor may elect to participate in automated credit card payments provided for by the City and its financial institution. This Program is provided as an alternative to payment by check and is available for the convenience of the Contractor. If the Contractor voluntarily participates PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT. 1 (Over $20K with Performance Bond) 8.F.b Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) in this Program, the Contractor will be solely responsible for any fees imposed by financial institutions or credit card companies. The Contractor shall not charge those fees back to the City. A B Payment and Performance Bond. Pursuant to Chapter 39.08 RCW, the Contractor, shall provide the City a payment and performance bond for the full contract amount. Retainage. The City shall hold back a retainage in the amount of five percent (5olo) of any and all payments made to the Contractor for a period of sixty (60) days after the date of final acceptance, or until receipt of all necessary releases from the State Department of Revenue, the State Department of Labor & Industries, and the State Employment Security Department, and until settlement of any liens filed under Chapter 60.28 RCW, whichever is later. The amount retained shall be placed in a fund by the City pursuant to RCW 60.28.011(4)(a), unless otherwise instructed by the Contractor within fourteen (14) calendar days of the Contractor's signature on the Agreement, Defective or Unauthorized Work. The City reserves its right to withhold payment from the Contractor for any defective or unauthorized work. Defective or unauthorized work includes, without limitation: work and materials that do not conform to the requirements of this Agreement; and extra work and materials furnished without the City's written approval. If the Contractor is unable, for any reason, to satisfactorily complete any portion of the work, the City may complete the work by contract or otherwise, and the Contractor shall be liable to the City for any additional costs incurred by the City, "Additional costs" shall mean all reasonable costs, including legal costs and attorney fees, incurred by the City beyond the maximum Contract price specified above. The City further reserves its right to deduct the cost to complete the Contract work, including any Additional Costs, from any and all amounts due or to become due the Contractor. c. Final Payment: Waiver of Claims. THE CONTRACTOR'S ACCEPTANCE OF FINAL PAYMENT (EXCLUDING WITHHELD RETAINAGE) SHALL CONSTITUTE A WAIVER OF CONTRACTOR'S CLAIMS, EXCEPT THOSE PREVIOUSLY AND PROPERLY MADE AND IDENTIFIED BY CONTRACTOR AS UNSETTLED AT THE TIME FINAL PAYMENT IS MADE AND ACCEPTED. IV. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The parties intend that an Independent Contractor- Employer Relationship will be created by this Agreement. By their execution of this Agreement, and in accordance with Ch. 51.08 RCW, the parties make the following representations: A. The Contractor has the ability to control and direct the performance and details of its work, the City being interested only in the results obtained under this Agreement, B. The Contractor maintains and pays for its own place of business from which the Contractor's services under this Agreement will be performed' The Contractor has an established and independent business that is eligible for a business deduction for federal income tax purposes that existed before the City retained the Contractor's services and is a service other than that furnished by the City, or the Contractor is engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession, or business of the same nature as that involved under this Agreement. The Contractor is responsible for filing as they become due all necessary tax documents with appropriate federal and state agencies, including the Internal Revenue Service and the state Department of Revenue. The Contractor has registered its business and established an account with the state Department of Revenue and other state agencies as may be required by the PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 2 (Over $20K with Performance Bond) D c D E 8.F.b Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) Contractor's business, and has obtained a Unified Business Identifier (UBI) number from the State of Washington, The Contractor has a valid contractor registration pursuant to Ch. L8.27 RCW or an electrical contractor license pursuant to Ch. 19.28 RCW. The Contractor maintains a set of books dedicated to the expenses and earnings of its business. V. TERMINATION. The City may terminate this Agreement for good cause. "Good cause" shall include, without limitation, any one or more of the following events: A. The Contractor's refusal or failure to supply a sufficient number of properly skilled workers or proper materials for completion of the Contract work' The Contractor's failure to complete the work within the time specified in this Agreement. The Contractor's failure to make full and prompt payment to subcontractors or for material or labor. D The Contractor's persistent disregard of federal, state or local laws, rules or regulations. E. The Contractor's filing for bankruptcy or becoming adjudged bankrupt' F. The Contractor's breach of any portion of this Agreement' If the City terminates this Agreement for good cause, the Contractor shall not receive any further money due under this Agreement until the Contract work is completed. After termination, the City may take possession of all records and data within the Contractor's possession pertaining to this project which may be used by the City without restriction. VI. PREVAILING WAGES. The Contractor shall file a "statement of Intent to Pay Prevailing Wages," with the State of Washington Department of Labor & Industries prior to commencing the Contract work. The Contractor shall pay prevailing wages in effect on the date the bid is accepted or executed by the Contractor, and comply with Chapter 39.12 of the Revised Code of Washington, as well as any other applicable prevailing wage rate provisions. The latest prevailing wage rate revision issued by the Department of Labor and Industries is attached. VII. CHANGES. The City may issue a written change order for any change in the Contract work during the performance of this Agreement, If the Contractor determines, for any reason, that a change order is necessary, the Contractor must submit a written change order request to the person listed in the notice provision section of this Agreement, Section XVI(D), within foufteen (14) calendar days of the date the Contractor knew or should have known of the facts and events giving rise to the requested change' If the City determines that the change increases or decreases the Contractor's costs or time for performance, the City will make an equitable adjustment. The City will attempt, in good faith, to reach agreement with the Contractor on all equitable adjustments. However, if the parties are unable to agree, the City will determine the equitable adjustment as it deems appropriate, The Contractor shall proceed with the change order work upon receiving either a written change order from the City or an oral order from the City before actually receiving the written change order. If the Contractorfailsto require a change orderwithin thetime specified in this paragraph, the Contractor waives its right to make any claim or submit subsequent change order requests for that portion of the contract work. If the Contractor disagrees with the equitable adjustment, the Contractor must complete the change order work; however, the Contractor may elect to protest the adjustment as provided in subsections A through E of Section IX, Claims, below' The Contractor accepts all requirements of a change order by: (1) endorsing it, (2) writing a separate acceptance, or (3) not protesting in the way this section provides. A change order that is accepted by the PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 3 (Over $20K with Performance Bond) F G B. c. 8.F.b Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) Contractor as provided in this section shall constitute full payment and final settlement of all claims for contract time and for direct, indirect and consequential costs, including costs of delays related to any work, either covered or affected by the change. VIII. FORCE MAJEURE, Neither party shall be liable to the other for breach due to delay or failure in peformance resulting from acts of God, acts of war or of the public enemy, riots, pandemic, fire, flood, or other natural disaster or acts of government ("force majeure event"). Performance that is prevented or delayed due to a force majeure event shall not result in liability to the delayed pafty. Both parties represent to the other that at the time of signing this Agreement, they are able to perform as required and their performance will not be prevented, hindered, or delayed by the current COVID-19 pandemic, any existing state or national declarations of emergency, or any current social distancing restrictions or personal protective equipment requirements that may be required under federal, state, or local law in response to the current pandemic. If any future performance is prevented or delayed by a force majeure event, the party whose performance is prevented or delayed shall promptly notify the other party of the existence and nature of the force majeure event causing the prevention or delay in performance. Any excuse from liability shall be effective only to the extent and duration of the force majeure event causing the prevention or delay in performance and, provided, that the party prevented or delayed has not caused such event to occur and continues to use diligent, good faith efforts to avoid the effects of such event and to perform the obligation' Notwithstanding other provisions of this section, the Contractor shall not be entitled to, and the City shall not be liable for, the payment of any part of the contract price during a force majeure event, or any costs, losses, expenses, damages, or delay costs incurred by the Contractor due to a force majeure event' Performance that is more costly due to a force majeure event is not included within the scope of this Force Majeure provision. if a force majeure event occurs, the City may direct the Contractor to restart any work or performance that may have ceased, to change the work, or to take other action to secure the work or the project site during the force majeure event. The cost to restart, change, or secure the work or project site arising from a direction by the City under this clause will be dealt with as a change order, except to the extent that the loss or damage has been caused or exacerbated by the failure of the Contractor to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement. Except as expressly contemplated by this section, all other costs will be borne by the Contractor, IX. CLAIMS. If the Contractor disagrees with anything required by a change order, another written order, or an oral order from the City, including any direction, instruction, interpretation, or determination by the City, the Contractor may file a claim as provided in this section. The Contractor shall give written notice to the City of allclaims within fourteen (14) calendardays of the occurrence of the events giving rise to the claims, or within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date the Contractor knew or should have known of the facts or events giving rise to the claim, whichever occurs first . Any claim for damages, additional payment for any reason, or extension of time, whether under this Agreement or otherwise, shall be conclusively deemed to have been waived by the Contractor unless a timely written claim is made in strict accordance with the applicable provisions of this Agreement. At a minimum, a Contractor's written claim shall include the information set forth in subsections A, itemslthrough5below. FATLURE TO PROVTDE A COMPLETE, WRTTTEN NOTIFICATTON OF CLAIM WTTHIN THE TIME ALLOWED SHALL BE AN ABSOLUTE WAIVER OF ANY CLAIMS ARISING IN ANY WAY FROM THE FACTS OR EVENTS SURROUNDING THAT CLAIM OR CAUSED BY THAT DELAY. Notice of Claim information: Provide a signed written notice of claim that provides the following The date of the Contractor's claim; The nature and circumstances that caused the claim; PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 4 (Over $20K with Performance Bond) A 1, 2. 8.F.b Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) B. 3. The provisions in this Agreement that support the claim; 4. The estimated dollar cost, if any, of the claimed work and how that estimate was determined; and5. An analysis of the progress schedule showing the schedule change or disruption if the Contractor is asserting a schedule change or disruption. Records. The Contractor shall keep complete records of extra costs and time incurred as a result of the asserted events giving rise to the claim. The City shall have access to any of the Contractor's records needed for evaluating the protest. The City will evaluate all claims, provided the procedures in this section are followed. If the City determines that a claim is valid, the City will adjust payment for work or time by an equitable adjustment. No adjustment will be made for an invalid protest. Contractor's Dutv to Complete Protested Work. In spite of any claim, the Contractor shall proceed promptly to provide the goods, materials and services required by the City under this Agreement, Failure to Protest Constitutes Waiver. By not protesting as this section provides, the Contractor also waives any additional entitlement and accepts from the City any written or oral order (including directions, instructions, interpretations, and determination). E. Failure to Follow Procedures Constitutes Waiver. By failing to follow the procedures of this section, the Contractor completely waives any claims for protested work and accepts from the City any written or oral order (including directions, instructions, interpretations, and determination). X. LIMITATION OF ACTIONS. CONTRACTOR MUST, IN ANY EVENT, FILE ANY LAWSUIT ARISING FROM OR CONNECTED WITH THIS AGREEMENT WITHIN 120 CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE DATE THE CONTRACT WORK IS COMPLETE OR CONTRACTOR'S ABILIry TO FILE THAT CLAIM OR SUIT SHALL BE FOREVER BARRED. THIS SECTION FURTHER LIMITS ANY APPLICABLE STATUTORY LIMITATIONS PERIOD. XI. WARRANTY. The Contractor warrants that it will faithfully and satisfactorily perform all work provided under this Agreement in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. The Contractor shall promptly correct all defects in workmanship and materials: (1) when the Contractor knows or should have known of the defect, or (2) upon the Contractor's receipt of notification from the City of the existence or discovery of the defect. In the event any parts are repaired or replaced, only original replacement parts shall be used-rebuilt or used parts will not be acceptable. When defects are corrected, the warranty for that portion of the work shall extend for an additional year beyond the original warranty period applicable to the overall work. The Contractor shall begin to correct any defects within seven (7) calendar days of its receipt of notice from the City of the defect. If the Contractor does not accomplish the corrections within a reasonable time as determined by the City, the City may complete the corrections and the Contractor shall pay all costs incurred by the City in orderto accomplish the correction, XII. DISCRIMINATION. In the hiring of employees for the performance of work under this Agreement or any sub-contract, the Contractor, its sub-contractors, or any person acting on behalf of the Contractor or sub-contractor shall not, by reason of race, religion, color, sex/ age, sexual orientation, national origin, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability, discriminate against any person who is qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates. The Contractor shall execute the attached City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Policy Declaration, Comply with City Administrative Policy !.2, and upon completion of the contract work, file the attached Compliance Statement. XIII. INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the Contractor's PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 5 (Over $20K with Performance Bond) c D 8.F.b Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) performance of this Agreement, except for that portion of the injuries and damages caused by the City's negligence. The City's inspection or acceptance of any of the Contractor's work when completed shall not be grounds to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Contractor and the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers, the Contractor's duty to defend, indemnify, and hold the City harmless, and the Contractor's liability accruing from that obligation shall be only to the extent of the Contractor's negligence. IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE INDEMNIFICATION PROVIDED HEREIN CONSTITUTES THE CONTRACTOR'S WAIVER OF IMMUNIry UNDER INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE, TITLE 51 RCW, SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS INDEMNIFICATION. THE PARTIES FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED THIS WAIVER. In the event the Contractor refuses tender of defense in any suit or any claim, if that tender was made pursuant to this indemnification clause, and if that refusal is subsequently determined by a court having jurisdiction (or other agreed tribunal) to have been a wrongful refusal on the Contractor's part, then the Contractor shall pay all the City's costs for defense, including all reasonable expert witness fees and reasonable attorneys'fees, plus the City's legal costs and fees incurred because there was a wrongful refusal on the Contractor's part. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. XIV. INSURANCE. The Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance of the types and in the amounts described in Exhibit [Insert Exhibit #] attached and incorporated by this reference. XV. WORK PERFORMED AT CONTRACTOR'S RISK. The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and subcontractors in the performance of the contract work and shall utilize all protection necessary for that purpose. All work shall be done at the Contractor's own risk, and the Contractor shall be responsible for any loss of or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in connection with the work. XVI. MISCELLANEOUSPROVISIONS A. Recvclable Materials. Pursuant to Chapter 3.80 of the Kent City Code, the City requires its contractors and consultants to use recycled and recyclable products whenever practicable. A price preference may be available for any designated recycled product. B. Non-Waiver of Breach. The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, or to exercise any option conferred by this Agreement in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of those covenants, agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect. C. Resolution of Disputes and Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. If the parties are unable to settle any dispute, difference or claim arising from the parties' performance of this Agreement, the exclusive means of resolving that dispute, difference or claim, shall only be by filing suit exclusively under the venue, rules and jurisdiction of the King County Superior Court, King County, Washington, unless the parties agree in writing to an alternative dispute resolution process. In any claim or lawsuit for damages arising from the parties' performance of this Agreement, each party shall pay all its legal costs and attorney's fees incurred in defending or bringing such claim or lawsuit, including all appeals, in addition to any other recovery or award provided by law; provided, however, nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit the City's right to indemnification under Section XIII of this Agreement. PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 6 (Over $20K with Performance Bond) 8.F.b Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) D. Written Notice. All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the parties at the addresses listed on the signature page of the Agreement, unless notified to the contrary. Any written notice hereunder shall become effective three (3) business days after the date of mailing by registered or certified mail, and shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing. E. Assignment, Any assignment of this Agreement by either party without the written consent of the non-assigning party shall be void. If the non-assigning party gives its consent to any assignment, the terms of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and no further assignment shall be made without additional written consent. F, Modification. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the City and the Contractor. G. Entire Aqreement. The written provisions and terms of this Agreement, together with any Exhibits attached hereto, shall supersede all prior verbal statements of any officer or other representative of the City, and such statements shall not be effective or be construed as entering into or forming a part of or altering in any manner this Agreement. All of the above documents are hereby made a part of this Agreement. However, should any language in any of the Exhibits to this Agreement conflict with any language contained in this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. H. Compliance with Laws. The Contractor agrees to comply with all federal, state, and municipal laws, rules, and regulations that are now effective or in the future become applicable to the Contractor's business, equipment, and personnel engaged in operations covered by this Agreement or accruing out of the performance of those operations. L Public Records Act. The Contractor acknowledges that the City is a public agency subject to the Public Records Act codified in Chapter 42.56 of the Revised Code of Washington and documents, notes, emails, and other records prepared or gathered by the Contractor in its performance of this Agreement may be subject to public review and disclosure, even if those records are not produced to or possessed by the City of Kent. As such, the Contractor agrees to cooperate fully with the City in satisfying the City's duties and obligations under the Public Records Act. J. City Business License Required. Prior to commencing the tasks described in Section I, the Contractor agrees to provide proof of a current city of Kent business license pursuant to Chapter 5'01 of the Kent City Code. K. Counterparts and Siqnatures by Fax or Email. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, and all of which will together constitute this one Agreement. Fufther, upon executing this Agreement, either party may deliver the signature page to the other by fax or email and that signature shall have the same force and effect as if the Agreement bearing the original signature was received in person. // // // // // // PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT. 7 (Over $20K with Performance Bond) 8.F.b Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) CONTRACTOR: By Print Name: Its DATE: CITY OF KENT: By Print Name:Dana Raloh Its Mavor DATE: IN WITNESS, the parties below execute this Agreement, which shall become effective on the last date entered below. All acts consistent with the authority of this Agreement and prior to its effective date are ratified and affirmed, and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to have applied. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kent Law Depaftment ATTEST: Kent C Clerk IIn this field, you may enter the electronic filepath where the cont.act has been saved] PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 8 (Over $20K with Performance Bond) NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: CONTRACTOR: [Insert Contact Name] [Insert Company Name] IInsert Address] [Address - Continued] [Insert Telephone Number] (telephone) flnsert Fax Number] (facsimile) NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: CITY OF KENT: [Insert Name of City Rep. to Receive Notice] City of Kent 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 (253) flnsert Phone Number] (telephone) (253) [Insert Fax Number] (facsimile) 8.F.b Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) 9124121 ,2:22 PM CHRISTENSEN INC GENERAL CONTR CHRISTENSEN INC GENERAL CONTR gvtc t -9 { !!:ig-9,s P-e rsg n- Principals CHRISTENSEN, KEVIN PHILLIq PRESIDENT r PRESTO, JOSEPH lll, VICE PRESIDENT r CHRISTENSEN, BARBARA ANN. SECRETARY Doing business as CHRISTENSEN INC GENERAL CONTR WA UBI No. 601 546 765 2840 CR|TES ST SW #100 OLYMPIA, WA 98512 360.709.0330 THURSTON Gounty Business type Corporation Governing persons KEVIN P CHRISTENSEN COLIN CHRISTENSEN; REID CHRISTENSEN; License Verify the contractor's active registration / license / certification (depending on trade) and any past violations. Construction Contractor Active Meets current requirements. License specialties GENERAL License no. CHRISIG066LB Effective - expiration 06/02/1 994- 06 I 11 12022 Bond Ohio Cas lns Go Bond account no. 673409C Received by L&l 10t06t2020 Bond history !.ni!tr?t'9-e- West American lns Co Policy no. BKW57232670 Received by L&l 0610912021 lnsurance history Savings Nb Savings accounts during the previous 6 year period $12,000.00 Effective date 08t2612019 Expiration date Until Canceled $1,000,000.00 Effective date o6t't6t2019 Expiration date 061't612022 Lawsuits aqainst the bond or savinqs https://secure.lni.wa.gov/verifi//Detail.aspx?UBl=601546765&LlC=CHRlSlG066LB&SAW=1t3 8.F.b Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) 9124121 ,2:22 PM Cause no. 17-242343-34 Complaint filed by CRESCENT MECHANICAL INC Complaint date o4t2612017 CHRISTENSEN INC GENERAL CONTR 9p-"-n Complaint against bond(s) or savings 46W8075719 Complaint amount $76,154.49 Cause no. 17-242343-34 Complaint filed by CRESCENT MECHANICAL INC Complaint date o511612017 Dismissed Complaint against bond(s) or savings 46W8075719 Complaint amount $76,154.49 L&l Tax debts No Llii tiii iiCbts are recorded for this contractor license during the previous 6 year period, but some debts may be recorded by other agencies. License Violations No iicitriait-VloiCti6ns during the previous 6 year period. Gertifications & Endorsements OMWBE Certifications Nci dclivii Ceiiiiiicaiiiins.iixist for this business. 4pPRn-!i-q-e- f-Eiil ns A'g-e,nl N6;Ctii;e Wai;liiiigtitii iSgiiterea apprentices exist for this business. Washington allows the use of apprentices _ . registered with Orlgon oi Montana. Contact the Oregon Bureau of Labor & lndustries or Montana Department of Labor & lndustry to verify if this business has apprentices. Workers'Gomp Do you know if the business has employees? lf so, verify the business is up-to-date on workers' comp premiums. L&l Account ID Account is current' gqz,_e2,3-{-0 Doing business as CHRISTENSEN INC GENERAL CON Estimated workers reported Quarter 2 of Yeat 2021 "31 to 50 Workers" L&l account contact T0 / KARLA BOWMAN (360)902-5535. Email: BOWK235@lni.wa.gov Public Works Requirements Verify the contractor is eligible to perform work on public works projects Re-q! jlgd-rt9j1i!-s:F.J.f _e-9!iv-*e._J,11ltt:1.-z-Q!.9 Exempt from this requirement. Contractor Strikes Nd-dtiikea haV; 66en issued against this contractor. Contractors not allowed to bid Nit-ii;tteiriieiiG-hii:G bceii-i$ned against this contractor Workplace Safety & Health Check for any past safety and health violations found on jobsites this business was responsible for. lnspection results date 07t08t202'l lnspeclion no. 317963838 Location 2020 W Meeker St Kent, WA 98032 Violations https://secure.lni.wa.gov/verify/Detail.aspx?UBl=601546765&LlC=CHRlSlG066LB&SAW=2t3 8.F.b Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) 9124121,2'.22PM lnspection results date , 0111112021 lnspection no. 317961118 Location CHRISTENSEN INC GENERAL CONTR Violations 98506 Rd. WA 206 Lilly Olympia, lnsp€ction results date 08t1012020 lnspection no. 317959736 Location 422Lllly Road SE Olympia, WA 98506 Violations lnspection results date 01tost2020 lnspection no. 317957372 Location 221 College ST NE Olympia, WA 98516 No violations lnspection results dat€ o6t27t2019 lnspection no. 317954832 Location 3505 Paciflc Ave Olympia, WA 98501 Violations lnspection results date 03/01/2016 lnspection no, 317939166 Location 408 Cleveland St. SW Tumwater, WA 98501 Molations https://secure.lni.wa.gov/verifi//Detail.aspx?UBl=601546765&LlC=CHRlSlG066LB&SAW=3t3 8.F.b Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) $ nor$$Hll{cloN Department of Labor & lndustries Certificate of Workers' Compensation Coverage September 24,2021 WA UBI No. L&lAccount lD Legal Business Name Doing Business As Workers' Comp Premium Status Estimated Workers Reported (See Description Below) Account Representative 601 546 765 867,973-00 CHRISTENSEN INC GENERAL CONTRACTOR CHRISTENSEN INC GENERAL CON Account is current. Quarter 2 of Year 2021 "31to 50 Workers" Licensed Contractor? License No. , License Expiration Employer Services Help Line, (360) 902-4817 Yes CHRISIG066LB 06t1112022 What does "Estimated Workers Reported" mean? Estimated workers reported represents the number of full time position requiring at least 480 hours of work per calendar quarter. A single 480 hour position may be filled by one person, or several part time workers. lnd ustrial lnsurance Information Employers report and pay premiums each quarter based on hours of employee work already performed, and are liable for premiums found later to be due' lndustrial insurance accounts have no policy periods, cancellation dates, limitations of coverage or waiver of subrogation (See RCW 51.12.050 and sr.r6.r90). 9124121,2:23 PM CHRISTENSEN INC GENERAL CONTRACTOR https://secure.lni.wa.gov/verifyiDetails/liabilityCertificate.aspx?UBl=601546765&LlC=CHRlSlG066LB&VlO=&SAW=false&ACCT=86797300 1t1 8.F.b Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) Ctrristensen Inc. GINERAL CONTRN CTOR z84o Crites St. SW, Suite loo Tumwater, WA 98Srz 36o-7o9-o330 FAX 36o-7o9-ozzo e-mail proiadmin(ocincgc.com October I,202I RE: City of Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvements - Centennial Center - Third Floor To Whom It May Concern: This letter is to confirm the following: Christensen Inc. General Contractor, including any subsidiary companies or affiliated companies under majority ownership or under control by the owners of the bidder's company, are not and have not been in the past three (3) years, disqualified from bidding on any public works contract under RCW 39.06.010 or 39.12.065 (3). That within the three-year period immediately preceding the bid solicitation date, Christensen Inc. General Contractor, is not a "willful" violator as defined in RCW 49.48.082, of any provisions of chapters 49.46,49.48, or 49.52 RCW, as determined by a final and biding citation and notice of assessment issued by the Department of Labor and Industries or through a civil judgement entered by a court of limited or general jurisdiction' Respectfully, Joe Presto General Manager cc: File 8.F.b Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) n*#f;fFh* Ctrristensen Inc. GENgRAL CONTI{r\CTOIt 2840 Crites Street SW Suite #100 Tumwater, WA 98512 360-709-0330 FAX 360-709-0220 E-mail projadmin@cincgc.com Current Jobs in Progress Project Name: Chief Leschi School Auditorium 5625 52"d StE Puyallup, WA 98371 Architect: NAC Architecture 2025I't Ave Suite 300 Seattle, WA 98121-3131 Percent Completed: 5% Project Name: Kenyan Community Church 26820 Pacific Hwy S Kent, WA 98032 Architect: Osbom Architects Inc. 101 I SW Klickitat Way #208 Seattle, WA 98134 Percent Completed: 7s% Project Name: Riverbend Driving Range P3 2020W Meeker St Kent, WA Architect: Broderick Architects 55 S Atlantic St #301 Seattle, WA 98134 Erik de los Reyes Percent Completed: t00% Owner: Puyallup Tribe of Indians 3009 East Portland Ave Tacoma, WA 98404 Contract Amount: $3,588,000 Estimated completion date: March2022 Owner: Kenyan Community Church 9656 Waters Ave S Seattle, WA 98118 Contract Amount: Approx. $8 Million Estimated completion date: November 2021 Owner: City of Kent 220 4th Ave S Kent, WA 98032-5895 Nathen Harper Contract Amount: $1,700,600 Estimated completion date: September 2021 I 8.F.b Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) **ffi* Christensen Inc. CENERAL CONTI{ACTOIT 2840 Crites Street SW Suite #100 Tumwater, WA 98512 360-709-0330 FAX 360-709-0220 E-mail projadmin@cincgc.com Project Name: Kentwood HS PAC Center 25800 164th Ave SE Kent, WA 98042 Architect: SCR Architects 1916 Pike Place Suite 12 Seattle, WA 98101 Percent Completed: 80% Project Name: Meridian Elem. MP Room 25621 140th Ave SE Kent, WA 98042 Architect: SCR Architects 1916 Pike Place Suite 12 Seattle, WA 98101 Chris Reinhart (206) 8s2-5re2 Percent Completed: r00% Owner: Kent School District No. 415 12033 SE 256ft Street Kent, WA 98030 Contract Amount: $798,000 Estimated completion date: November 2021 Owner: Kent School District No. 415 12033 SE 256ft Street Kent, WA 98030 David Bussard Contract Amount: $3,463,000 Estimated completion date: August 2021 2 8.F.b Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) *a'ffif,,:4l+ Christensen Inc. (; E NE tl i\ L C ON T It AClTOlt 2840 Crites Street SW Suite #100 Tumwater, WA 98512 360-709-0330 FAX 360-709-0220 E-mail projadmin@cincgc.com References Architect:Contract Amount: $4,107,744DLR Group 33017 134ft Ave SE Auburn, WA 98092 *New construction of 80119 Sf'Iligh School including classrooms, admin offices, and student commons. 25Vo completed with Christensen forces. Completed 2020. Project Name: Challenger HS 18020 B St E Spanaway, WA Project Name: WSSDA 225 College St NE Olympia, WA 98516 Project Name: SKHS Stem Improvements 425 Mitchell Ave Port Orchard, WA 98366 Owner: Bethel School District 5410 184th St E, Bldg C Puyallup, WA 98375 Owner: Dept. of Enterprises PO Box 41476 Olympia, WA Jonathan Martin Owner: S. Kitsap School District No. 402 2689 Hoover Ave SE Port Orchard, WA 98366 Architect:Contract Amount: $3,195,000MSGS Architects 510 Capitol Way S Olympia, WA **Demo of single story building, sitework TI, new construction of 7 1925 SF wood framed single story building.2Soh completed with Christensen forces. Completed 2020. Architect:Contract Amount: $1,388,000BLRB Architects, P.S. 1250 Pacific Ave, Suite 700 Tacoma, WA 98402 *Tenant improvements to STEM classrooms at existing school. 157o completed with Christensen forces. Completed 2020. 1 8.F.b Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: Christensen Inc Bid (2871 : Kent Police Detectives Tenant Improvement Project Bid - Award) DATE: October 19, 2021 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Reappointments to the Kent Parks and Recreation Commission - Confirm MOTION: I move to confirm the Mayor’s reappointment of Scott Taylor and Kristie Duggan to their second three-year terms on the Kent Parks and Recreation Commission that will begin on October 16, 2021 and end on October 15, 2024. SUMMARY: The Kent Parks and Recreation Committee was created to foster local input on the strategic planning efforts that influence Kent’s parks and recreation system and provide guidance on the following: • Ways to advocate public support, involvement, and funding of Kent parks, facilities, and programs; • Opportunities to engage the public in decisions affecting Kent parks, facilities, and programs; • Budget recommendations for the acquisition, development, and operation of parks, facilities, and programs; • Policy recommendations; • Comprehensive parks and trails planning; • Priorities for the acquisition of land and/or facilities; • Development, design, and operation of parks, facilities, and programs; • Capital improvements planning; • Rules, regulations, or other restrictions applicable to parks, facilities, and programs; • Concessions at park facilities; • Contracts, interlocal agreements, and lease agreements regarding parks and recreation activities. • Other matters that the mayor or city council, or parks director, may refer to the parks and recreation commission for its consideration and recommendation. After an extensive recruitment process, in September of 2018, both Scott Taylor and Kristie Duggan were interviewed by the Director of Parks, Julie Parascondola, and then Parks Commission Chair and Co-Chair and were selected for appointed for a term of October 16, 2018 through October 15, 2021 Both Kristie Duggan and Scott Taylor, who also serves as the Commission Chair, 8.G Packet Pg. 323 have requested reappointment and are eligible to serve a second and final three- year term. I am pleased to recommend reappointment for Scott Taylor and Kristie Duggan to the Kent Parks and Recreation Commission BUDGET IMPACT: None. SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Inclusive Community - Embracing our diversity and advancing equity through genuine community engagement. 8.G Packet Pg. 324