HomeMy WebLinkAbout4433ORDINANCE NO. 4433
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, amending the Parks and
Recreation Element of the city's Comprehensive Plan
related to the adoption of the 2022-2027 Park and
Open Space Plan. (CPA-2021-8).
RECITALS
A. Pursuant to the Growth Management Act (GMA), the city's
comprehensive plan provides for planning activities and capital budget
decisions that are consistent with the comprehensive plan' RCW
36.70A.120. The Parks and Recreation Element provides the foundation and
guidance for the park system within the city. The Parks and Recreation
Element includes an inventory of existing parks and open spaces, level of
service standards, a summary of public participation, goals and policies, and
opportunities for regional coordination'
B. The city council's strategic aoals include the creation of
neighborhood urban centers, connections for people and places, fostering
inclusiveness, and beautifying Kent.
The purpose of the 2022-2027 Park and Open Space Plan is to
L Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Park and Open SPace Plan
cPA-2027-8
c
develop a long-range vision to guide the continued planning and
development of the overall park system to better, and more equitably, serve
current and future residents of Kent. The document serves as a roadmap
for the prioritization of capital funds and a decision-making tool for city staff
to carry out day-to-day operations.
D. This update focuses on development of level of service metrics
for land acquisition, updates to recreational value scores, racial and social
equity planning and engagement, GIS data and analysis, sustainable
funding plan, and an update to project priorities. When the Park and Open
Space Plan is integrated into the Parks and Recreation Element of the city's
Comprehensive Plan, it will direct future development, acquisition and
renovation of parks and open spaces for the short and long-term future.
E. The city is required to update the Park and open space Plan
every six years to be eligible for grant funding through the state Recreation
and Conservation Office (RCO), which is a significant source of funding for
city-funded capital projects. Adoption of this updated plan in July 2022 will
allow the city to apply for grants in the upcoming grant cycle'
F. The Park and open space Plan has undergone an extensive
public process. In 202L, Kent Parks put together a city-wide engagement
plan by sending 65,000 postcards, placing 100 signs in parks and along
trails, held 6 on-site events, conducted a social media campaign, and posted
in city newsletters and on reader boards. Community members were asked
to participate in a statically valid or/and a general survey, between these
surveys there were 817 responses, During the entire engagement process
there were 2,993 touch points made throughout the community'
Com prehensive Pla n Amend ment
Park and Open SPace Plan
cPA-2027-8
2
G. On April 25, 2022, the city provided the State of Washington
the required 60-day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 of the city's
proposed amendments. No comments were received'
H. On May 2I, 2022, the city's State Environmental Policy Act
(SEPA) Responsible Official issued an Addendum to the City of Kent
Comprehensive Plan Review and Midway Subarea Planned Action
Environmental Impact Statement and City of Kent Downtown Subarea
Action Plan Planned Action Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement.
The Addendum did not identify any additional significant adverse
environmental impacts associated with the proposed Comprehensive Plan
amendment.
I. On April 25, 2022, the Land Use and Planning Board (*LUPB")
held a workshop to discuss the update to the Park and Open Space Plan as
well as the associated amendment to the Parks and Recreation Element of
the Kent Comprehensive Plan, On May 23,2022, the LUPB held a public
hearing to consider the matter. At the close of the public hearing, the LUPB
voted to recommend adoption of the Comprehensive Plan amendment and
2022-2027 Park and Open Space Plan.
J. The City Council's Economic and Community Development
Committee considered the LUPB's recommendation at its regularly
scheduled meeting on June 13, 2022, and forwarded its own
recommendation to the full City Council. The Park and Open Space Plan
update was also considered by the City Council's Parks and Human Services
Committee on June 2,2022.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT,
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Park and Open Space PIan
cPA-2021-8
3
ORDINANCE
SECTION 7. - Incorporation of Recitals. The preceding recitals are
incorporated herein,
SECTION 2. - Amendment The 2022-2027 Park and open space
Plan, attached as Exhibit "Ar" is hereby incorporated into the Parks and
Recreation Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan'
ECTION 3, - Severability. If any one or more sections, sub-
sections, or sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or
invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of
this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect.
SEoTION 4, - Corrections bv citv clerk or code Reviser. upon
approval of the City Attorney, the City Clerk and the code reviser are
authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the
correction of clerical errors; references to other local, state or federal laws,
codes, rules, or regulations; or ordinance numbering and section/subsection
numbering.
SECTION 5, - Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be
in force 30 days from and after the date of passage as provided by law.
Comprehensive Plan Amend ment
Park and Open SPace Plan
cPA-2027-8
4
TAM
DANA RALPH,
ATTEST:
KIMBERLEY A
A
MOTO,Iry LERK
D AS TO FORM
ITE, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
ir.+ :, it "'
June 21. 2022
Date Approved
June 2L. 2022
Date Adopted
June 24, 2022
Date Published
Com p reh ensive PI a n Amen d ment
Park and Open Space Plan
cPA-2027-8
5
Exhibit A
Fmmks & ffipffiffi Spmtrffi PAffiwr 2ffi2ffi
TE
,J tj r6319::i...1r,";^..,
Contents
Porks ond Open Spoce Plon I City of Kenl2022
Acknowledgments
Executive Summory
Glossory of Terms
3
5
7
01
02 fii":.,f#]H"".,
Demogrophics of Kent
Notionol Recreotionol Trends
Porks Plon Engogement
How Do Porks Respond
03 ffiffi#,i*"
Pork Clossificolions
Geospotiol Doto ond Heot MoPPing
Noture Score
Athletic Copocity Study
Studying the System
Whot ls q Porks ond Open Spoce Plqn?
the Role of Porks ond Open Spoce in the City
The Role of Porks Plonning in the City
A Brief History of the Pork System
Why Do We Need o Plon?
I
t2
t5
t6
r9
2l
)'1
28
29
34
37
3B
45
47
53
55
62
04
05
Where We Are Going
Vsion ond Gools
Project Outcomes
Skotegic Proiects
Systemwide lnitiotives
Systemwide Operotionol ond Mointenonce Needs
Cilywide Conneclions
Proiects by Region
Strotegic Proiecls Summory
How We Will Get There
Funding
O&M Versus Copiiol Funding
The Problem with Reoctive Moinlenonce
Funding Stotus
Our Funding Bucket
Portnerships with Alternote Providers
Gools ond Policies
Appendices
Focus Group lnlerview Summories A
Kent PRCS Communiiy lnterest & Opinion Survey Report B
Stotisticolly Volid Survey Priorily lnveslment Roling by Roce C
Stotisticolly Volid Survey by Plonning Region D
Generol Survey Tobulor Results E
Websile lnput F
Similor Providers G
Technicol Memo: Heot Mopping Mehods H
Kent Porks Property lnventory I
MojorAssef lnventory J
Athletic Field Copocity Study K
Exponded RV Methodology Explonotion L
Cover Photo Credits
1: View olong ihe Kent
Volley loop Troil,
creditTom Groy
2: Loke Meridion Pork
3:Arbor Hoights 360
climbing pinnocle
4: loke Meridion Pork
5:Wilson Ployfields
6: Clork Loke Pork
Z Eorfiworks Pork
8:Wilson Ployfields
65
66
o/
6B
69
71
73
90
o5
96
96
97
t0t
114
I5
12306
conclusion
Acknowledgments
This plan is the end result of many community conversations, stakeholder interviews, and
input gathered from a broad representation of residents in Kent. The city of Kent Parks,
Recreation and Community Services Department wishes to acknowledge and thank the
many individuals who participated in the surveys and various engagement opportunities that
helped shape this plan. Truly, it is this collaboration that gives this plan validity as we seek to
preserve and protect public land in Kent.
ln this process, we want to acknowledge that the City of Kent and all its parks sit on the lands
of the Duwamish, Muckleshoot, and Coast Salish peoples, whose ancestors have lived here
since time immemorial. We are grateful to their stewardship of this land, and we give respect
to the many indigenous people who continue to flourish here.
We also wish to thank the Parks and Recreation Commission for their commitment to
understanding the complex issues and challenges associated with addressing the parks and
recreational priorities and needs ofthe residents ofKent.Their involvement and support of
the plan continues to profoundly influence the direction of the department.
Additional thanks go to the numerous staff in multiple departments who reviewed and
commented on the document in its various drafts, and who collaborated in building a
common understanding of diversity, equity, inclusion, and key metrics for promoting social
equity.Their input was indispensable in this effort.
The department extends our gratitude to the firms of Berger Partnership, PROS Consulting,
and Herrera Environmental Consultants, whose professional collaboration was crucialto the
development ofthe document and the continued evolution ofa performance-based Level of
Service.
Our recognition and thanks are also extended to the Mayor and City Council for their interest
and support in this important effort.
"Sweel Suile" Elizobelh Conner sculplure, Town Squore Plozo
Kent Moyor
Dana Ralph
Kent City Council
Bill Boyce
Brenda Fincher
Satwinder Kaur
Marli Larimer
Zandria Michaud
Les Thomas
Toni Troutner
Council President
Councilmember
Councilmember
Councilmember
Councilmember
Councilmember
Councilmember
C h i e f Ad m i n i strat ive Offi ce r
I nterim Chief Ad mi n istrative Offi cer
Parks, Recreation and Community Services Directot
Deputy Director
Pa rk O pe rot io n s S u pe ri n te n de nt
Re cre at io n a nd Cu lt u ra I S e rvice s S u pe r i nte nde nt
Accounting Manager
Parks Planning and Development Manager
Parks Planner
Parks Planning and Development Specialist
Parks Copital Project Manager
Parks Capital Project Manager
GIS Anolyst
Race and Equity Monager
Senior Long Ronge Planner
Tra n sport ot i on En g i ne e r i ng M a n ag e r
C ity Tra n s p o r tat io n M a n ag e r
C ity Tra n s po rtat io n P I an n e r
Long Range Planning Manager
Human Services Coordinator
N e ig hbo r ho od P ro g ro m Co o rd i n ato r
S e n io r CD BG Co ord i n ato r
Kent Porks ond Recreotion Commission
Jennifer Ritchie Chah
KristieDuggan ViceChair
Edith Gonzalez
Elizabeth Carter
Kathleen Meehan
Matthew Morgan
Michael J. Javelli
Richard Minutoli
Roberto Arellano, Jr.
Sarah Veele
Scott R. Taylor
Stuart Chapman
Taek Kim
Berger Portnership, Consultonts
Greg Brower
Andy Mitton
Stephanie Woirol
Christine Abbott
Ann Salerno
Laura Laney
Christine Gannon
Pros Consulting
Leon Younger
ScottVollmer
Austin Hochstetler
Herrero Environmentol Consultonts
Jennifer Schmidt
ciry sroff
Derek Matheson
Pat Fitzpatrick
Julie Parascondola
Brian Levenhagen
Garin Lee
Lori Hogan
Phung Huynh
Terry Jungman
Kerry O'Connor
Lynn Osborn
Bryan Higgins
Michael Espenan
Cassidy Sawyer
Uriel Varela
Kaelene Nobis
Rob Brown
April Delchamps
David Paine
HB Harper
Lori Guilfoyle
Maria Tizoc
Dinah Wilson
Executive Summory
Parks are part of what makes a place special. Kent is fortunate to have a rich diversity of
both people and parks, making our city an attractive place to live, work, and play' Kent is
growing both in terms of population and diversity, creating increased demand for parks and
open space and changes in how residents use the park system'The 2022 Parks and Open
Space Plan (2O22Plan) establishes goals and identifies strategic projects to meet the needs
of our community through earnest community engagement and tracks outcomes with
performance-based metrics.
First and foremost, the 2022Plan centers diversity, equity and inclusion (DEl) as core principles
that guide all other components of the plan. Kent Parks is committed to providing a high-
quality recreational experience for all residents and visitors. Understanding what this means
for a growing and changing population can only be achieved through authentic community
engagement and transparent decision-making. With thousands of community touchpoints
through our engagement efforts and focused conversations with community-based
organizations, we feel that this is truly a shared vision formed by Kent residents and reflective
of the rich diversitythat makes Kent unique.
The 2O22 Plan furthers concepts established in the 201 6 Parks and Open Space Plan (201 6
Plan) with updates to the performance-based Level of Service (LOS). After a full six-year cycle
of implementing work under this methodology, there is clear and project-based evidence of
how focusing on both the quality and quantity of recreational amenities in each park results
in high-performing parks. with performance-based Los concepts well established, this plan
also layers in more traditional LOS metrics, which focus on quantity of parkland to identify
areas of the city that are parkland deficient and inform a land acquisition strategy.
The LOS analysis gains a degree of precision in the 2022 Plan with the introduction of
geospatial mapping and analysis. Layering data related to park access, walkability, transit,
population density, and racial and social equity provides a clear view of park needs across the
city, proving certain recommendations that were previously known but also revealing and
informing new recommendations. Making this data publicly available and easy to interpret
serves the need for transparency, one ofthe primary goals ofthis plan.
Wilson Ployfields
The 201 6 Plan told the story of a park system laden with failing assets without the resources
to replace them. This powerful story led to new funding sources and reinvestment into the
system. Kent parks are more resilient today than they were in 2016, but there is more work to
be done. As Kent continues to grow and with the global pandemic shining a renewed light
on the importance ofeasy access to quality parks, trails, and open spaces in urban settings,
continued investment is more important than ever. This increased demand for parks can
only be met with increased funding for: 1) capital development to meet the demand for new
and expanded facilities and 2) operations and maintenance (O&M) to keep our parks system
performing at a high level. Funding one without a proportionate increase in the other knocks
the park system out of balance, leading to either a backlog of capital redevelopment or a park
system that is less inviting and less safe with assets with reduced lifecycles due to reactive
maintenance.
The findings and recommendations of the 2022 Plan are summarized under four goals. These
four goals inform nine project outcomes, which are the basis for prioritization of individual
strategic projects:
While the 2022 plan is both ambitious and
achievable, the results of the 201 6 plan prove
that the City of Kent will benefit from finding
a way to meet these objectives. This plan lays
out a clear framework for how to reach the
high bar that it sets, and the Kent community
deserves nothing less. The result will be a park
system that helps define the character of our
city and makes our residents proud to call
Kent home.
r&"''., ltg :
1'fffft'"t'"-'t"t G
G"Poftnelshi>
,@
AthrGrics s Maintenoncy
Operotions &
Access
Noturol
Resoutces
G3G@Guu
:!.i:
Cquiry Slrotogic
Amenities Troils
PHYSICATACCESS
FOR AtL
TRANSPARENCY &
COMMUNICATION
DIVERSITY OF HIGH-
AUALITY AMENITY
SYSTEM
RESILIENCY
Glosssry of Terms
Access Point
A place where a park user can enter a park by
walking, biking, rolling, or driving.
Acquisition
Purchase of new property, increasing overall
park acreage. The goal of most acquisitions is
to provide open space and Recreational Value
in areas ofthe city that are deficient.
Ameniiy
See'Recreational Amenity.'
Asset
Any built component in the park system
valued at over S 1 0,000.
Asset Grode
A number assigned to each asset that
reflects the asset's physical condition. The
scale ranges from 1 to 5, with a grade of 1
reflecting an asset that is near or at the end
of its useful life. A grade of 5 reflects an asset
that is new or like new.
Copocity or Corrying Copocity
The maximum use an asset, park, or system
can handle before it is either too full of
people or the use causes difficult-to-repair
damage.
Copitol Developmeni
Construction projects that develop previously
undeveloped parkland into a new formal park
space or expand the use of an existing park
space, including the addition of major new
amenities.
Copitol Repoir/ Redevelopment
Construction projects that repair or replace
failing infrastructure or otherwise aging
amenities in kind. Examples are repaving a
parking lot, replacing worn-out athletic field
syntheticturf, or improving drainage of an
existing grass field.
Community Pork
A useful traditional classification of parks'
Community parks serve the city with unique
activities and are generally expected to have
a high enough level of Recreational Value to
draw users from around the city. People are
anticipated to access these parks by foot, car,
bike, and transit.
Equolity
Equality means providing everyone with
the same amount of resources regardless
of whether everyone needs them. ln other
words, each person receives an equal share of
resources despite what they already have or
don't have.
Equity
Equity is when resources are shared based
on what each person needs in order to
adequately level the playing field.
Heot Mop
A tool that overlays various metrics onto
a map. Metrics can include a wide variety
of information; for this effort the metrics
included access points, equity, Recreational
Value, a 10-minute walk, and a 1 o-minute
drive. The metrics add together to create an
understanding ofwhere highest needs for
new parks or new amenities exist in the park
system.
Level of Service {LOS)
A measure of how well a public agency is
providing for (or serving) the public. The
traditional measure of LOS for park systems
in the U.S.A. has been acres per thousand of
population. The 20'l 6 Kent Parks and Open
Space Plan introduced a new approach to
LOS that evaluates the quality of amenities
and how they are distributed within the
city. The 2022Plan continues refining the
approach introduced in 2016; refi nements
include assessments of physical access and
demographic equity.
Neighborhood Pork
A useful traditional classification of parks.
Neigh borhood parks provide convenient
access to active and passive recreational
opportunities for a neighborhood. Most
users are anticipated to walk or bike to these
parks. Recreational Value is generally lower
than community parks.
Overoll Pork Condition
A grade calculated for each park that reflects
the park's physical condition. lt is derived
by averaging the Park Property Grade and
average Asset Grade of that park. This score
is converted to the Park Condition Multiplier.
Pork ,Asset lnventory
An inventory of every capital asset in the
Kent park system valued at over 510,000.
This is a planning tool that tracks year built,
condition, size, life-cycle, and replacement
cost of park assets. This tool is used to
understand the yearly capital costs and
maintenance costs that will be needed to
preserve the system.
Pork Condition Multiplier
A number determined by the overall
park condition. The resulting number is
multiplied by number of amenities in a park
to determine the park's RecreationalValue.
Pork Performonce Tier
lmplemented in the 2016 Plan, tiers are used
to categorize parks by their Recreational
Value. The lowest tier for a functional park is
Tier 1 ; pa rks assessed below 1 a re considered
to not provide significant Recreational
Value. The highest performing park is a Tier
6, but higher tiers are possible.Tiers have
loose associations with more traditional
parks categories such as community and
neighborhood parks.
Pork Property Grode
A grade given to each park capturing its
general condition.This is independent ofthe
condition of its inventoried assets. The grades
range from t (failing) to 5 (functionally new).
Recreolionol Amenity
Any feature in a park that provides
opportunities to recreate or that makes
recreation more comfortable, attractive, or
accessible. lt may be a built feature, such as
a restroom, or a naturally occurring amenity,
such as a view of Mount Rainier. The number
of recreational amenities in a given park is
used in the RecreationalValue formula to
assess the park's current Recreational Value,
A conceptual level estimate of possible
complementary recreational amenities
is used to assess the park's potential
Recreational Value.
Recreolionol Volue (RV)
A type of Level of Service calculation that
measures the performance of an individual
park or an entire park system. The formula
takes into account how age and condition
of a park and its assets impact the quality
and quantity of recreational opportunities
provided. Newer parks and assets function at
a higher level (and provide a higher RV) than
deteriorated parks and assets.
Current Recreotionol Volue (CRV)
An assessment of a park system's or park's
individual performance, A park's CRV is
found by counting the park's existing
recreational amenities and multiplying by
the Park Condition Multiplier.
Potentiol Recreotionol Volue (PRV)
An assessment of how much Recreational
Value a park or property can provide at its
ultimate build-out, assuming the overall
park condition is a 5 (functionally new).
The assessment is done park by park by
determining how each park or property
would be developed/renovated, given
reasonable constraints and funding.That
expected development is then assessed
by adding up the number of recreational
amenities for each park or property.
Sustoinoble Funding
Perpetual and reliable sources of money.
F"
�Ilqllpllp "w-
pop
J1. Pt,
Id
Whatis a Parks and
Open Space Plan?
The Role of Parks and Open Space in the City
The Role of Parks Planning in the City
A Brief History of the Park System
Why Do We Need a Plan?
1•
1
l
i il•r.���
chapter
01
K E N T
>> P&O S
,2 PLAN
2022
15
]b
r �
� rl
•, t a
1+ itit 1 r/ i
.. l J
Whot is o PErks ond
Open Spoce Ffon?
Parks make cities livable by infusing play, nature,
and gathering into publicly accessible space. A
Parks and Open Space (P&OS) Plan maintains
the health of a park system. lt presents a
coherent plan for implementing the next phase
of acquisition, development and maintenance
for a park system, incorporating research, public
input, and financial and logistical factors.
Every six years Kent Parks, Recreation and
Community Services (PRCS), or Kent Parks,
updates their Park and Open Space Plan,
evaluating how the park system is serving
the public and identifuing strategic projects,
partnerships, and funding needed to better
serve the public. The 201 6 P&OS Plan created
a new way to measure the quality of the park
system and made clear the need for sustainable
funding to maintain high quality. Using the
2016 Plan as a tool, the city has dedicated a
sustainable source of capital funding. This 2022
P&OS Plan seek to build on the work and
accomplishments of the 2016 Plan to reassess
the quality ofthe system and continue building
it to respond to the diversity and population
growth of Kent today and in the future.
The focus ofthe 2022 P&OS Plan is to create a
resilient system that provides physical access
and a diversity of high-quality amenities
prioritized by need and using a transparent
process to identiry strategic projectt
partnerships, and funding.
The Role of Porks ond Open Spoce in the City
People value parks and open spaces for
so many reasons: the opportunity to walk
a dog, learn to ride a bike, play organized
sports, explore a trail, or engage in a wide
variety of other recreational activities.
These activities lead to heolth benefits
by providing contact with nature,
opportunities for physical activity, and social
interaction. Well-designed and maintained
parks also contribute to the economic
development of a community by
providing popular amenities that people look
for when deciding where they want to live
and work. Healthy open spaces offer hobitot
for urbqn urildlife. cleon lhe oir, and
obsorb stormwoter runoff. Parks and
open spaces contribute to a community's
aesthetics and serve as landmarks that
people associate with a community's identity.
The city is not the only provider of
recreational opportunities in Kent. school
playgrounds and sports fields, private gyms,
and other recreational sites owned by other
organizations also provide space to play. All
these facilities are valued components of
Kent's recreational"menu,"and they all play
important roles in the community.They're
largely not discussed here because the city
has no authority to plan, manage, or improve
private, outside agency, and school-owned
facilities. Kent Parks has initiated partnership
conversations with other recreation providers
in the city to find mutually beneficial
opportunities to provide high-quality
recreation. These partnerships are discussed
throughout the report and include enhanced
athletic field partnerships with the Kent School
District.
@[r
The Role of Porks
Plonning in the Cifr
Many city planning efforts are complementary
to park planning and together build the
blueprint for an evolving Kent. A Parks and
Open Space Plan fits into requirements and
guidance from the state of Washington's
Growth Management Act (GMA).The GMA
requires the city to complete and regularly
update a Comprehensive Plan (Comp Plan).
Last updated in 2015, Kent's Comp Plan
provides a vision through 2035. lt creates a
framework for how the city will accommodate
growth through land-use regulations and
infrastructure planning, including parks and
recreation, and guides future legally binding
regulations.
The P&OS Plan is a complementary document
that feeds into the Parks Strategic Framework,
which then feeds into the Comp Plan.
The Parks Strategic Framework outlines a
clear, accessible path for implementing the
foundation laid in the Comp PIan.
There are many city programs and plans that
look at various aspects ofthe city and inform
each other, working together to create a
vibrant and equitable Kent.
Wilson Ployfields
Rolly the Volley Suboreo Pion provides
a 20-year vision for the industrial valley
including amenities and trail connections.
Why It's lmportont: The industrialvalley
is where many people spend theirdays
working, and it has an interconnected
network of park and trails for them to
enjoy during daytime hours.The majority of
land in the valley is already developed and
unavailable to the park system, so privately
owned amenities and connections to park
and trails are to be celebrated and built upon.
Tronsporfofion Moster P/on provides a
20-year vision for the city's holistic bike/
ped/vehicu la r/transit experience.
Why lt's lmportonf: Multimodal (bike/ped/
transit/other) corridors create ease of access
for high numbers of residents and other park
users. Understanding how people access
park and trails and providing transportation
options is an important consideration when
planning park projects.
Community Deve/opmenl Block Gronl
Consolrdofed Plon for Housing ond
Communily Deve/opmenf is updated
every five years and provides objectives
and outcomes for investment in the
development of urban communities.
Why lt's Imporlonf: The plan and grants
focus on providing decent housing, living
environment, and economic opportunities
to create a healthy, thriving, and inclusive
community for all Kent residents.
Cily of Ke nt Downlown Suboreo Action Plo n
pursues a dense, mixed-use urban centerthat
complements transit.
Why lt's imporlonl:The DSAP emphasizes
pedestrian and bicycle connections,
particularly to park and transit, as part
of an integrated transportation system.
Developing, maintaining. and operating
high-quality park in downtown is a key
action within the plan.
GOLF BUSINESS PIAN
HUMAN SERVICES
STRATEGIC PIAN
CDBG CONSOTIDATED PLAN
FOR HOUSING & CD
O&MPIAN
COMP REC
PROGRAM PIAN
FACILITIES MASTER, PLAN
PARKS STRATEGIC
FRAMEWORK
P&OS PLAN
COMP PIAN
TRANSPORTATION
MASTER PLAN
KENT HOUSING OPTIONS PIAN
VALLEY
IN D!!r8la!!!ca&EAilall
CITY OF KENT DOWNTOWN
SUBAREA ACTION PIAN
2o1o Zo15 Zo2O
KEY:
CDBG = COMMUNIlY DEVELoPMENT BTOCK GRANT
COMP = COMPREHENSIVE
KVIT = KENT VATLEY LOOP lRAltS PIAN
P&OS - PARKS & OPEN SPACE
REC = RECREATION
ooooo PUBTICATION DATE
OF CURRENT PIAN
)-/I
I 7
-r
-L-7
,lITY
-.\ -a-
rr
i-\r
-d.
Y
.d.-,\
,N
-/\'!r
-a-
.A
rr
A -tr
-A-
!7 \r
-/V
Y
A-A-\r
PtAN
,\v -r/- -v
-r.AA
-6-lr \r
rr
-&.lr
-6.
-t\-7
-Lrr
GREEN KENTA-tr
./l'v
Porks Slrofegic Fromework is updated every five years and consolidates the individual plans
that provide visions for the various divisions of the Parks, Recreation and Community Services
(PRCS) department, link to city strategic planning, and overall vision for the department.
Why lt's lmporfonf: This is the guiding light of values, framework, and goals for the PRCS
department, driving work plans for each division of the department and connecting actions
to community outcomes.
Comprehensive Recreofion Progrom
Plon provides an eight-year vision for
programming of interior and outdoor
facilities in the park system.
Why lt's Importonl: Planning a system
includes looking at the spread of recreation
across a city. While interior facilities tend to
provide different sorts of amenities than
exterior parks, interior and exterior amenities
can complement and balance each other.
Go/f Business Plon is updated every
six years and provides a plan for the golf
complex.
Why lt's lmportont: The plan provides a
golf experience for all levels of play ability
and aligns core, essential, and discretionary
services.
Facilities Moster Plon provides a
condition assessment and 20-year vision for
city-owned interior facilities and strategic
projects for those facilities.
Why It's lmporfont; This assessment is
closely tied to the Recreation Program Plan
and the system of amenities and services
the city can provide residents, visitors, and
employees. Many park properties have
facilities within or adjacent to them that are
important considerations in identifying park
amenities.
Kent Volley Loop Troils Plon looks at
linking together various park and trail
segments (Green River, lnterurban, Frager Rd.)
in the Downtown, Green River, and West Hill
regions.
Why lt's lmportont:
Parks and links between them already
existed but not in formal or intuitive ways.
Some connections only needed signage;
others needed inf rastructu re improvements.
Together the improvements create a
system of short and long trails for users of
all abilities and comfort levels connecting
workers, residents, and visitors to a large
urban and natural area.
Green Kenl Plon lools at vegetation
management in Kent',s green Spaces.
Why lt's lmportont:
Kent Parks has a unique opportunity to
protect and enhance habitat areas and
provide education about nature. Removing
invasive plant species and supporting native
species is a key part of this mission.
Humon Services Slrotegic Plon is
updated every five years and creates a vision
for high-quality service for all residents.
Why lt's lmporfonl: This plan creates a
healthy, thriving, and inclusive community
by ensuring access to opportunity and
services that respect each person! unique
experiences.Kenf Housing Oplions P/on provides a
20-year vision for housing in Kent.
Why lt's lmporfonf: Kent has a growing
demand for housing. The Housing Options
Plan establishes policy for how Kent can
meet this demand, influencing areas of
housing and business density. This in turn
influences the number of people in an area
of the city, which is a key factor in locating
and allocating funding to parks.
14
O&M Plon is continuously updated and
focuses on preventative maintenance,
urban forestry, natural resources, fleet
management, and asset management.
Why lt's lmporfonf: This work supports
the health of the park system and ensures
high-quality recreation for Kent's residents.
A Brief History of the Pork System
Completed over decades, Kent's park system
was forged through thoughtful planning
and community commitment. This planning
has been acknowledged in various venues,
including being the 1988 NRPA Gold Medal
Grand Award Winner for Parks and Recreation
and the recipient ofthe 1 991 NRPA Gold
Medal for Adaptive Recreation.The Gold
Medal Award honors communities throughout
the United States that demonstrate
excellence in long+ange planning, resource
management, and innovative approaches to
delivering superb parkand recreation services
with fiscally sound business practices.
The late 90's and early 2000's saw a number
of significant parks built or annexed into the
city, including Lake Meridian Park (annexed
from King County), Wilson Playfields, Arbor
Heights 360, Town Square Plaza and Service
Club Ballfields. These gains were paired with
the loss of 2 soccer fields at Hogan Park, 3
youth ballfields at Borden Playfields and
a combination of soccer/baseball fields at
Commons Playfields. These tradeoffs shifted
parks from downtown to the new population
center on East Hill, but additional plans to add
parks to meet demand from Kent's growing
population were put on hold due to reduced
capital and operating budgets. This ultimately
resulted in a net loss of 3 ballfields, 6 soccer
fields and a number of needed new parks not
getting built.
Leading up to the 201 6 plan, the lack of funding. going back a decade, had allowed many
park amenities to fall into disrepair and failure. Around that time, Kent was emerging from
a period of economic recovery and the Parks Department where the parks department had
to use its already limited operating budget to supplement its capital budget resulting in a
series of small playground renovations but did not keep up with bigger system needs for
reinvestment. Park amenities were deteriorating faster than they could be replaced and a
growing maintenance backlog resulted in a parks system that was falling further behind each
year. The 201 6 Plan called for sustainable funding to allow reinvestment into and renovation
ofthe existing park system to begin to catch-up on this deficit.
ln response to that plan, sustainable capital funding (business and occupation taxes) have
been allocated to parks, allowing for significant and sustainable progress in replacing failing
amenities and developing new amenities. That funding supported recently completed and
ongoing projects, some of which are reflected in the below list.
Recently Completed ond Ongoing Proiects
\ Hogan ParkatRussell Road Field l Turf conversion \ LakeMeridian DockReplacement
\ Lake Meridian Restroom Renovation/Restoration \ West Fenwick Park Renovation
\ Lake Fenwick Floating Walkway Replacement \ Riverbend Driving Range lmprovements
\ MillCreekCanyonCleanupandTrailRepair \ KiwanisTotLot3Renovation
\ service Club Ballfields Drainage lmprovements \ Meridian Glen Park Renovation
\ WiffCo Field/New Playground at Kent Memorial Park \ Wilson Playfields Shelter lnstallation
\ Parkland Acquisition:
\ Clark Lake
\ Upper Mill Creek
\ Morrill Meadows
\ Kherson Park Playground and Green Space (construction in 2022)
\ Monill Meadows Phase 2lmprovements (construction in 2022)
\ Springwood Park Renovation (design in 2022)
\ Van Doren! Landing Park Replacement (construction in 2022)
\ Salt AirVista Renovation (construction in 2022)
\ Chestnut Ridge Renovation (construction in 2022)
\ 4th and Willis Greenways Trail and Landscape (construction in 2022)
The sustainable capital funding achieved
since the 2016 Plan is a major step forward for
the park system, and when combined with a
recent surge in real estate excise tax revenues
it has allowed for a significant first wave of
reinvestment that has saved parkamenities
from having to be closed or removed due to
failure. The park department also passed the
city's first ever park impact fee to ensure that
growth in the city helps pay for the increased
demand it will put on the park system.
These additional capital funding sources
are only the first step toward addressing
the needs of Kent's growing and diverse
population. As discussed in later chapters,
existing funding only partially addresses
the repair and renovation need ofexisting
amenities. leaving very little for the
acquisition, expansion and development
needed to equitably provide for Kent's
growing population. Additionally, increased
daily operations and maintenance budget is
needed to responsibly ensure each old and
new asset is maintained consistently and at a
high quality to keep it performing for a long
lifespan.
fhe2022 Plan looks to continue the
momentum of reinvestment of the 2016 Plan,
with the additional focus of providing a more
equitable spread of amenities, developing
new parks, and ensuring funding for
adequate maintenance.
Why Do We Need q Plqn?
Creating a P&OS Plan and keeping it current
ensures the city is managing park responsibly
and that they qualifiT for key funding. For
example a city is only eligible for certain
state-funded capital grants if they maintain a
current Parks and Open Space Plan.The plan
ensures that the city can receive glant funding
through theWashington State Recreation and
Conservation Office (RCO), a program that has
provided millions of dollars to Kent over the
years to acquire, develop, and redevelop parks'
Arguably more important is the vital need for
the city to regularly take a critical look at its
services and ask hard questions about how it is
performing those services. Are they still relevant?
Are they meeting the needs and priorities of the
community? ls the city investing an appropriate
level of resources into them? Addressing these
questions is part of the city's responsibility to its
residents to do a prudent and responsiblejob of
stewarding the resources entrusted to it.
Kent is an evolving city, with an increasingly
dense and diverse population of people from
different backgrounds and countries. As density
increaset use demands increase on the park
system, and options to meet that demand
decrease.The 2022 Plan look to determine if the
system adequately provides for Kent's diversity
and density and to identifi/ how to equitably
and thoughtfully apply its resources to provide
quality park access for the most residents
possible.
How can an existing park system adequately
respond to the recreational needs of
an increasingly diverse and urbanizing
community? This plan will attempt to answer
the question by focusing on four key goals
and nine project outcomes:
Gools
\ Physical AccessforAll
\ Diversity of High-Quality Amenity
\ System Resiliency
\ Transparency and Communication
Proiecl Outcomes
\ Access
\ Strategic Amenities
\ Partnerships
\ Equity
\ Trails
\ Athletics
\ Programming
\ Operations and Maintenance
\ Natural Resources
With these goals and outcomes, the city can
help ensure that this park system-more than
1OO years old-can provide vibrant, relevant,
safe, and attractive recreational opportunities
for residents today and into the future.
• • a
r
4 ���, r �. •�•�+`. �� ��.■ , �� � �� � ■ ice• • � • ,��
r � j •
I! t
� f f
a
chopter
Our Community
Role of o Porks Deportment
Ihe City of Kent
Demogrophics of Kent
N otionol Recreotionol Trends
Porks Plon Engogement
How Do Porks Respond
19
21
23
2B
29
34
KENT
P&OS
PLAN
2022
I
I
t
_--\_- \-\ '\
Role of o Porks Deporlment
Thejob of Kent's Parks, Recreation. and
Community Services, or Kent Parks, is to
enhance community health by providing a
range of services to the people who live in,
work in, and visit Kent. Kent Park's mission,
"Dedicated to Enriching Lives;" commits
to providing safe and inviting parks and
facilities, meaningful, inclusive, and diverse
recreational programs, cultural activities, and
human services.
Kent's park system includes 55 parks that
cover more than 1,070 acres, 54.7 miles
of trails, and programs and events that
serve over 1 .4 million people annually. The
importance of public services and green
space has become starkly apparent during
the recent COVID-l9 Pandemic and social
justice movements as people search for
physically and emotionally safe places to
recreate and connect.
To continue growing and enhancing
the system and communit, Kent Parks
approaches decision making in a way that
emphasizes social, environmental, and
economic benefits with ten areas of focus:
\ Social Equityand lnclusion
\ Basic Needs and Self-Reliance
\ Health and CommunityWellness
\ Economic Development
\ Youth Development/Out-of-School Time
\ Healthy Aging
\ Land and Facilities Stewardship
\ Arts and Culture
\ Environmental Sustainability
\ ActiveTransportation
ln support ofthose ten areas, Kent Parks:
\ Designs, builds, and maintains parks and
trails with guidance from the Parks and
Recreation Commission.
\ Provides recreational programs.
\ oversees cultural arts programs with
guidance from the Arts Commission.
\ Maintains city recreational facilities.
athletic facilities. and golf.
\ Funds human services programs with
direction from the Human Services
Commission.
lnformed decisions that build this mission
are based on an understanding ofthe city,
community, and national and localtrends.
KiwonisTot Lol #3
lne cifv of K:"1
The City of Kent is in a prime economic
location within Washington State's most
populous county, King County. Within
20 miles of Kent City Hall there are two
interstate freeways, three highways, two
national railroad lines, three regional transit
commuter rail stations, one light rail station,
an international airport, and two international
deep-water seaports. These connections have
made Kent the fourth largest manufacturing
and distribution center in the country,
home to companies like Amazon, Boeing,
Blue Origin, and many other businesses
that populate the industrial valley. Kent's
vibrant and diverse economy is the economic
barometer for the region; home to 10,000
businesses and 63,000jobs, Kent is the
eighth most ethnically diverse city in the
United States with a diverse population of
approximately 137,000 people who speak 138
different languages.
^ Regionol Proximity
Situated as a suburb directly between Seattle and Tacoma, the City of Kent's position in the
regional landscape lends itself to many connections with metropolitan and environmental
opportunities.
ln many ways, Kent is defined bY the
diversity of its community and the rich mix of
industrial, residential, and natural areas within
its borders. The city is roughly bisected by
the Green River and its associated flat valley
bordered by steep steps up to the West Hill
and East Hill. The valley is further bisected
by Highway 167 and zoning boundaries,
creating areas thought of as Downtown
and the industrial valley. Creeks that feed
into the Green River cut through East Hill,
creating ravines and natural areas that restrict
movement. East Hill is a large area, mostly
residential with some retail, that is further
crisscrossed by major streets like Highway
515 and E James Street. West Hill is separated
from the rest ofthe city by the Green River,
Highway5l6,and is bisected byl-5.
r CiDr Regions
Natural and man-made edges create functional regions of Kent. Region edges are defined by
busy streets or highways, steep topography, rivers, and transitions between industrial and
residential development.These regions aie useful forthinking about how people use and
move through the city, and they create a way of understanding where a certain type of park
development might be needed.
D9m-os1ophj11of renf
Any discussion about system planning must be based on an understanding of the community
that the system serves.This section describes the current and future population of Kent,
including key characteristics such as age segment, race ethnicity, and income levels. Future
projections and trends are based on historical patterns. Note that unforeseen circumstances
that diverge from these patterns may have significant impacts on these figures. All data were
acquired in July 2021 and reflect numbers as reported by the 2020 Census as well as estimates
for 2026,2031, and 2036 as obtained by Environmental Systems Research lnstitute, lnc. (ESRI).
Greenview Pork
Wilson
2021 Medion Age
35.8
Totol Households
47,650
Totol Populoiion
136,766
Roce
4t6o/owhi,te 24o/o etion
l27o Blotl orlfricon
37o Americon lndion, Aloskc
or Pociftc lslqnder
Notive,
Medion Household lncome
573,691
Populoiion )
The city's population has grown 1.30olo per
year from 2010 to 2021, with a similar increase
in households. ln 2021, the population
was estimated at136,766 individuals living
within 47,650 households. Projecting ahead,
the total population and total number of
households are both expected to continue
growing at an above-average rate over the
next 15 years. Based on 2033 predictions,the
city is expected to have 161,101 residents
living within 54,551 households,
Age )
Nearly half the population of Kent is below
the age of 35, with a median age of 35.8
years old. ln the coming years, Kent's senior
population is anticipated to grow and the
youth and child segments decline.
Populction & Households
152,935
144,658
47,650 49,975
t6r,r0l
|8,589
42,626
201 0
2010
Census
t36,766
203r
Proiection
54,551
" :'I:,
t;" :1: :
ii,idlt
52,257
,i',' .
.', .'. i
'fLr-'.
1.1't, il:kai+'
'sli' '",1:''!.1'..;
$;1,,
zlr . rl
2021 2026 203',|
Populotion by Age Segment
ao-17 J tB-34 135-54 s5-7a 475*
20%
2021
Eslimote
2036
20"/"
2026
Prolection
2036
Proiection
'r Household lncome
The city,s median household income (s73,691) is moderately lower than the state medium
income (578,697) and considerable higher than the national average (565,2t 2).The average
per person (also known as per capita) income of Kent (535,753) is lower than the state of
Washington (S41,523), and is nearly the same as the national average (535,672).
INCOME CHARACTERISTICS
Medion Household Income
s73,691
Per Copilo Income
$3S,753
Medion Household lncome
528,692
Per Copito lncome
s41,523
Medion Household Income
$6s,7tz
Per Copito lncome
Sgs,6zz
Uniled Stotes of Americo
Roce ond Ethnicity
This report uses race and ethnicity to
understand and address inequity. Our
working understanding of race is similar to
what is defined in the 201 0 and 2020 Census:
"Racial categories generally reflect a social
definition of race recognized in this country
and not an attempt to define race biologically,
anthropologically, or genetically. ln addition,
it is recognized that the categories ofthe
race item include racial and national origin or
sociocultural groups. People may choose to
report more than one race to indicate their
racial mixture, such asAmerican lndian'and
'White"' (hnps://wwwcensus.gov/topics/
population/race/about.html).
The 2020 Census defined race as a person's
self-identification with one or more of the
following social groups:White, Black or
African American, Asian, American lndian
and Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian and
Other Pacific lslander, some other race, or
a combination of these. ldentification as
Hispanic or Latino Ethnicity was viewed
independentlyfrom race. Ethnicity is not
directly tied to race but rather is about
cultural expression and origin. For example,
people who identify as Hispanic, Latino, or
Spanish may be ofany race. Hispanic and
Latino are understood here to be ethnic
categories and not racial ones.
City of Kenl Stote of Woshington
2021
Mediqn Household lncome & Per Copito lncome
$118,967
$ 103,825
$88,783
$73,6e)
2021
Eslimote
I965IIIr,3s9
2026
Proiection
2031
Projection
2036
Projection
The 2020 Census data on race are not directly
comparable with data from the 2000 and
earlier censuses, so caution must be used
when interpreting changes in the racial
composition of the U.5. population over time.
The 201 0 Census and 2020 Census definitions
and nomenclature are used in this plan.
Americon lndion: This includes a person
having origins in any of the original peoples
of North and South America (including
Central America), and who maintains tribal
affi liation or community attachment.
Asion: This includes a person having origins
in any ofthe original peoples ofthe Far East,
Southeast Asia, or the lndian subcontinent
including, for example, Cambodia, China,
lndia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the
Philippine lslands, Thailand, and Vietnam.
Block or Africon Americon: This includes
a person having origins in any ofthe black
racial groups of Africa.
Nofive Howoiian or Other Pocific ls/onder:
This includes a person having origins in any of
the original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa,
or other Pacific lslands.
Whiie: This includes a person having origins
in any of the original peoples of Europe, the
Middle East, or North Africa.
Hisponic or lofino: This is an ethnic
distinction, a subset of a race as defined by the
Federal Government; this includes a person of
Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, South or Central
American. or other Spanish culture or origin,
regardless of race.
ShoWore Cenler Event
Roce )
Kent is a racially diverse city.The 2026
population estimate shows the largest
percentage is the White Alone category at
43olo of the population, and the Asian Alone
category is the second largest percentage
at27o/o. The racial diversification of the city
is much more than the national population,
which is approximately 70olo White Alone,
13olo Black Alone, andTo/o Some Other Race.
The predictions for 2036 expect the city's
population to continue a slow diversification.
WhiteAlone I
Black or African American Alone I
American lndian and Alaska Native Alone !
Asian Alone J
Native American and Other Pacific lslander Alone I
5omeotherRace I
TwoorMoreRaces I
Ethnicity )
The city's population was also assessed
based on Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. which
by the Census Bureau definition is viewed
independently from race. lndividuals who are
Hispanic/Latino in ethnicity can also identiflt
with any of the racial categories. Based on the
2010 Census, those of Hispanic/Latino origin
represented 1 5olo ofthe service area's current
population, which is slightly lower than the
national average (1 8olo Hispanic/Latino). The
Hispanic/Latino population is expected to
grow marginally over the next 15 years.
Populotion by Roce
Hisponic Populotion
I Hispanic/LatinoOrigin(anyrace) AllOthers
85% 84"/o 837o 92% B27o
p-,
20r0
Census
J'-,
2021
Estimote
!. !,9
2024 2029 2036
Proiection Proiection Proiection
20lo
Census
2021
Estimole
2026
Proiection
20,31
Proieclion
2036
Proiection
Notionol Recreqtionol Trends
The Sports & Fitness lndustry Association's
(SFIA) 2021 Sports, Fitness, and Leisure
Activities Topline Participation Report
provides a reference for national recreational
trends. One important influence on trends
has been the impact of COVID-l 9. Active
lifestyles and participation in socially
distanced sports and activities such as tennis,
pickleball, golf, trail running, skateboardin g,
surfing, day hiking, and recreational kayaking
has increased. Generallyteam sports have
shown consistent drops in participation, with
the exception of basketball and soccer, which
can be attributed to informal play.
Porticipotion by the Numbers
'::-:l :-
The top five sports with most participation
were basketball (27.9 million), golf (24.8
million), tennis (21.6 million), baseball (15.7
million). and outdoor soccer (12.4 million).
Between 201 5 and 202 1, the five sports with
largest growth in participation were golf
entertainment vsnues (72.3%), pickleball
(67 .60/o), le n ni s (20.5o/o), fl a g f o ot b a I I (20.1 o/o),
and basketball (1 8.6%). The five sports with
most rapid decline in partlcipation were
Ultimate Frisbee (-47.3o/o), squash C32olo),
fa st- p i tch sof lball (-26.40/o), to u ch footba I I
t25.3olo), and roller hockey C21.3olo).
The top outdoor recreation activities with
most participation were walking (1 14.0
million), day hiking (57.8 million), running/
jogging (50.7 million), road bicycling (44.5
million), and freshwater fishing (42.6 million).
Frcm 2O15-2O2O, day hiking (55.3olo), trail
running (45.60/o), BMX bicycling (44.2o/o),
skateboarding (37.8o/o), and fly fishing (27.3olo)
have undergone the largest increases in
participation.
Top water activities with most participation
were swimming (25.7 million), recreational
kayaking (13.0 million), and canoeing (9.6
million). Over the last five years, of activities
applicable to Kent, recreational kayaking
(3 6.90/o) and sta n d -u p pa d d I i n g (21 .7 o/o) w er e
the fastest growing water activities.
6@
€EED
@E@
@@
ND
€ED
@D
@D@
GE
@
@
.l14.0 million
Porks Plon Engogement
Engogement Process
Engagement is an ongoing effort rooted in
authentic communication. The engagement
process in Kent's park projects emphasizes
the importance of feedback representative
of all segments of Kent's population: all
ages, genders, ethnicities, first and second
generations of immigrants, all economic
statuses, home renters and owners, workers,
and people who don't generally have time
or interest in responding to requests for
participation in government projects and
activities.
To ensure that high-quality engagement
from the entire population is being received,
Kent Parks is using DEI (Diversity, Equity,
and lnclusion) principles.This practice
acknowledges all the ways people differ: race,
sex, gender, age. sexual orientation, physical
ability, socioeconomic status, religious beliefs.
and more (Diversity). The intent is that all
feel welcomed, supported, respected, and
valued including those who have historically
had less access or limited voice in the process
(lnclusion). To ensure that all voices are heard,
Kent Parks strives to provide fair treatment,
access, and opportunity for all by identifying
and eliminating barriers that have prevented
full participation of some groups in the past
(Equity).
Traditional outreach methods do not
reach enough people generally, but more
importantly, they typically do not reach
a wide d iversity of people. Traditional
outreach methods result in responses from
white, middle-income homeowners. As
demonstrated in the demographics section
ofthis report, this is not representative
of the average Kent resident.Traditional
outreach consists ofin-person town hall style
meetings held after working hours in a single
location. This limits the opportunities for the
community to participate. To build equity
into this engagement process, non-traditional
methods were used to ensure more of the
population was given the opportunity to
participate.
These non-traditional engagement
methods included working with internal city
committees and commissions and external
community-based organizations (CBOs) to
build community relationships and provide
more opportunities for a wider array of
residents to participate in the engagement
process. The COVID-19 pandemic made
non-traditional and in-person engagement
techniques more challenging to facilitate,
although some events were able to occur
between waves of the virus.
WEWANT
TO KNOW
WHATYOUR
FAVORITE
KENT PARK IS!
I Placeapinonthemapat
EngageKentFarks.com
.i,i j
t.!
.1"+.f'.J'i'i
9',
The project page on Kent Park's engagement
platform EngageKentParks.com provided
a central point for information access and
input. Concurrent efforts to reach and engage
as many communities as possible included:
\ Stakeholderlnterviews
\ lnternal City Personnel and
Committees/Commissions
\ Community-Based Organization
(CBO) lnterviews
\ EngageKentParks.com Online Activities
\ Map and Stories
\ Pop-Up Events
\ After-school Student Engagement
\ Surveys
\ StatisticallyValid Survey
\ General Survey
lnformation and awareness about the
planning process was spread through:
\ 65,000 postcards mailed to Kent residents
\ 100 signs in parks and along trails
\ Peachjar Flyer to all 42 schools
\ Recreation and Mayor's Newsletters
\ Recreation Program Guide
\ City readerboards at the Commons and
4th and Willis Street
\ Facebookevents and social media posts
1,799 817 304
V SITS PEO PLE PEO PL E
2,992 TOUCHPOINTS
The emphasis on authentic engagement and the strategies employed to that end allowed Kent Parks
to successfully engage a large part of Kent's population. 2,992 total touchpoints were made during
this project. T2 people individually or in CBO groups were interviewed; website interactions included
1,799 visits making275 contributions/stories; in-person pop-up events engaged 304 people with
input documented on the online platform; and 81 7 people took the survey,These numbers prove
that, given the opportunity, Kent residents want to engage.
tt
,r.i ),,
WEESIIE tlVE: llItPPlNe AND INPUI
YYPotuPEfNrs
GENERAI.
SURVEYUVE
SIAIISilCA[lY
VAIIDST'RVEYIIVE
AII{LETIC
SURVTYUVE
sTAKgHgtDERS
20.PEOPTE
COMI\f,UHITY.BA'ED
OREANIZATIONS
53 PEOILE
INTIRVIEWS
69 CONTRIBUTIONS
206 STORIES
I,593 AWARE
777 INFORMED
70} ENGAGED
WEBSITE SURVEYS
GENERAT
383 PEOPTE
STATISTICAt[Y VALID
434 PEOPIE
YMCA 13]
KENT COMMONS 69
WEST FEhIWCK PARK27
TEEN CENTER 19
IIGHT FESTIVAI,58
POP-UPS
Engogement Results
lnformation gathered during the engagement
process will help Kent Parks take a resident
driven approach to making decisions that
will guide the future ofthe system and better
serve all segments of the population.
Stakeholder interviews informed emerging
trends and guided the community survey
that was distributed in the fall of 2021.Two
methods of surveying were conducted:
\ The StatisticallyValid Survey and the
outreach surrounding it was structured to
reflect the demographic makeup of Kent.
The goal of this survey is to understand
how the park system can better serve all
segments of the population including
people who do not currently use it.
Segments ofthe population that
historically do not respond to surveys
were oversampled to achieve a response
that matches the demographics of Kent.
\ The General Survey, asking identical
questions, provided all residents of Kent
with another opportunity to give input
online. The General Survey was largely
taken by people who use Kent's parks and
trails multiple times per month.
Both surveys combined represent around
2o/o of Kent's population and provide distinct
insights into how people perceive the current
and future park system.
Survey Respondenis by Roce/Ethnicity
a 2O2O Census Breokdown: I Stotisticolly Volid Survey: Generol Survey Breokdown:
Populotion of 136,766 434 Respondonts 383 Respondonts
2l%-
Asion 20%
)5%
Hisponic, [olino,
or Sponish
t3%-
Block 12%.
B%
Pocific lslonder
47%
a9%
68%
white
16%
l5%
7%
2%
1%
-
Americon lndion
or Alosko Notive
t%D
2%,
The results ofthe StatisticallyValid Survey
showed that, overall, the level of satisfaction
with city parks is high, with more respondents
'very satisfi ed' or'satisfi ed' than'dissatisfi ed'
or'very dissatisfiedl Current maintenance of
parks had the highest level of satisfaction.
with 670lo of respondents'very satisfied' or
'satisfi edjan encouraging response. While
generally satisfied with current maintenance,
respondents emphasized that maintenance
should continue to be a priority over the next
five-year period. These sentiments about park
maintenance were reflected by those who
responded to the General Survey as well,
indicating that park maintenance now and in
the future is important to all Kent residents.
L Feeling of Sofely in Porks
2. Mointenonce of Porks
3. Adequocy of lighting ol Porks
4. Adequocy o[ Porking ot Porks
5. Number ond Voriety of Porks Oflered
6. Quolity o[ Youth Recreotion Progroms
7. Quolity of Adult Recreolion Progroms
8. Quolity of Outdoor Athletic Fields
9. Eose of Registering for Pork Progromy'Rentols
Level of Sotisfcclion with Ciry of Kent Porks
by percentoge o[ respondents using o 5-poinl scole, where 5 meons very mthfied o-nd 1 meons very disofislied (excluding don t lnow responses)
lVerySolisfied sSoilsfied -Neulrol Dissolisffsd lVeryDisrotisffed
F*
F*
Mointenonce of Porks
Number & Vorieiy
o[ Porks Olfered
Quoltiy of Ouldoor
Afiletic Fields
Adequocy of
Porking ol Porks
Feeling o[ Sofety in Porks
Adequocy of
Lighting ot Porks
Quolity of Youth
Recreolion Progroms
Eose of Registering lor
Pork Progroms/Reniols
Quolity of Adult
Recreotign Progroms
56.5%
rcv"'lzz
Items Thol Respondents Think Should Receive the Most Emphosis Over the Next Five Yeors
bythe sum percentoge of respondeMho choselhe ilem os one of fieirlop threechoices
aS
37.5v.
28.4%
G@ruffiHru4s6789
- ThirdChoice
ni S€cond Choice
- Fh, Choic€23
50
Amenity Top Priority lnveslmenls
t00 r50 200
ln addition to park maintenance, the
StatisticallyValid Survey and General Survey
respondents indicated many overlaps in
priorities, needs, and amenities. lnvestment
priorities were studied acknowledging that
certain city areas or demographic groups may
have a higher need for particular amenities.
Priorities were studied by city region where
respondents lived, race or ethnicity, and
owner/renter to inform appropriate locations
and equitable amenities for implementation.
Top priorities across all regions and
demographics focused on maintenance and
safety of parks. Additional priorities included
provision of a variety of amenities including
restrooms, nature trails, preservation of and
access to natural areas and habitat, farmer's
market event spaces, local and regional paved
trails, gardens, shelters and gathering spaces.
off-leash dog areas, amenities for all ages and
abilities, access to water, and playgrounds.
Specialized sports and active-use facilities
were indicated to be a lower priority.This is
likely due to these amenities serving a more
specific segment ofthe population than, say,
a playground or shelter which have a broader
user base. Specialized sports amenities are
still considered important offerings in the
park system, supporting active lifestyles in
the city; some may be offered as one-offs in
the system while some may be deprioritized
for the next six-year cycle.
ood
rt
I
a
\oN
q
oo
oo
6
aoG
I
@@
oN
NN
Key:
$ aff Respondents
Loch colegory rep'eserrs o vo'iety of etnnic ond c,llu'ol bockgrounds.
'g|oa1' 16ajp5 rl"ose who oentify os Bloc< or Afr'con Americor.
'As on' .cludes ll"ose who ,denlfy os lndior, Ch 1s5s, frlipino, "qpqnese, Ko'eor,
V -6 nonese. or os ood 9l s:hg' As qn 9' Sor'heost Asion cuhures
'lotino o'Hisporic'rncludes rhose who identfy os lo'ino, Pispolic, or of Spolish oagin
'W]":e' rclucjes rhose wro ident\7 os whrte, rrcd I onolv unde'slood os tl'ose descend'ng
f.om Coucosion communities.
'Other' includes lhose who identi[r os Americon lndion or Alosko Nolve or Pocific lslonder
including Nolive Howoiion, Guomonion ot Chomoro, Somoon, or other Pocific lslqnder
Overoll Priority Score
out of 200
Respondents' ldentified Roce:
-
Block
-
[otinoorHisponic
I Asiqn
r White
-
Other
NATURE TRAITS
NA]URAL AREAS /
BOTANICAT
GARDENS
ACCESS TO WATER
PTAYGROUNDS
How Do Pqrks Respond
The challenges and expectations for a park system are wide ranging. Demographic trends
have shown a growing and diversifiing Kent community, and COVID-19 has impacted
priorities, with national and engagement-indicated trends of decreased close contact team
sports and increased socially distanced activities. Major priorities noted through this planning
process include the need for increased access to nature and trails, access to safe and clean
parks, access to information, and continued involvement in planning. The engagement effort
of this plan has shown that people want to shape their park system, and they want their park
system to work for them. Kent Parks commits to continuing and growing the conversation
with the community and making information as transparent and readily available as possible
for this and future park projects.
Careful study and investment into the system must be done to prioritize projects with
acknowledgment of capital, maintenance, and operations budget constraints. Guided by
public engagement and observed trends. four goals are identified to meet the demands on
the park system, built around nine project outcomes (see Chapter 4 for more information):
Loke Fenwick Pork
Access
\/s \/a
q]pTnroerommins (3
\ /..', oo.rotion" i
t"
iointenoncy.!,Tf:)@ Athro'|ic3
\\G(rF Portnerrhips ,@Guu
\
Equity Slrotegic
Amenitiee Troilg
TRANSPARENCY &
COMMUNICATION
PHYSICAL ACCESS
FOR ALL
DIVERSITY OF HIGH-
OUALITY AMENITY
SYSTEM
RESILIENCY
rot
.
.
. . . . . . .....
M I I
4-1
Clark take Pbrk
I �
►—�` --
Where We Are
Benchmarking 37
Level of Setvice 3B
Pork Classifications 45
Geospatial Data and Heat Mopping 47
Nature Score 53
Athletic Capacity Study 55
Studying The System 62
chapter
03
K E N T
P&OS
PLAN
2022
The purpose ofthe park system is to serve
the residents of Kent with high quality
amenities and access to outdoor recreation.
To meet this purpose, this plan strives to
make informed and transparent decisions by
creating and utilizing a variety of metrics and
tools, including:
\ Benchmarking comparisons
to comparably sized cities
\ Traditional and Performance-Based
Level of Service
\ Park Classifications
\ Heat Mapping
\ Citywide Connections MaPPing
\ Nature Score
\ AthleticCapacityStudy
Benchmolking
While each park system is unique with individual challenges. it is useful to compare the Kent
system to peer cities. This data is a useful metric when considering the optimal size of Kent's
park system.The National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) collects data on cities of
various sizes. Data reflects 500 to 600 unique park and recreation agencies across the United
states, as reported between 201 8 and 2020, and includes information on amenities and
budgets.
Kent's population is around 137,000 which matches the NRPA'5 2021 National Agency
Performance Review upper quartile population of cities (populations of 100,000-250,000).
Evaluating Kent parks against NRPA data for amenities in similarly sized cities, Kent is largely
matched for softball fields and is exceeding expectations for miles of trails, but is underserved
in terms of parkland, soccer fields, baseball fields, and cricket fields.This information is a
useful starting point and can be weighed with engagement, Level of Service calculations.
heat mapping, and capacity studies to inform strategic projects for the system. NRPA data also
provides critical funding comparisons which are further discussed in chapter 5.
Benchmork Comporisons
City of Kent Metric NRPA (2021 ) Recommendotions for Kent
7,81 Acres / 1000 Reridents
0., Miles
I
3 Fields
I
Acres of Pork lond
Troil Miles
Soccer Fields
Boseboll Fields
Softboll Fields
Cricket Field
15.9 Acres / 1000 Residenls
.08 1000 Residents
Fields
r' field. {l Field,/ 38,889 Residenrs)
I Field ( I Field / 10,936 Residents)
fnI1000
lt Fted / 45,944
€ffiffiffiFffiffiiffiW
2 Fields { I Field / 68,850 Res;denrsl
Residents)
0 Fields
ffiieffi
Level of Service
Two important task ofa park and open space
plan include measuring a city's Level of Service
(LOS) for their park system and providing
recommendations for maintaining or adjusting
that LOS. Level of Service is a measure meant
to describe to a community how much of a
particular service residents are getting for their
tax dollars, For example the LOS for emergency
services usually tells people how many minutes
they can typically expect to wait for emergency
responses to a 91 1 call, or how long they will
usually wait to get through a given intersection
during rush hour. Cities strive to set LOS goals
that reflect the overall priorities and resources of
the community.
Measuring LOS for a park system can be trickier
than doing so for other municipal services
because the benefits of parks, while numerous,
are difficultto quantifi/.lt has been widely shown
that park and recreational facilities provide
immense value to a community. Organizations
like the American Planning Association, the Trust
for Public Land, and the Urban Land lnstitute
tell us that well-used and well-maintained park
tend to spur economic development in their
neighborhoods. The Centers for Disease Control
and the National Center for Biotechnology have
produced research demonstrating that parls
have positive impacts on physical and mental
health. Surveys consistently show that people
consider local park an important public amenity.
Wiffco Field ot Kenl Memoriol Pork
Traditional Level ofService for a park system is
entirely quantity based, calculated by taking
the acreage of parks and open spaces divided
by the population of the city. This metric
focuses on quantity and does not consider
quality, location, or distribution ofthe parks
or trails. Despite its shortcomings, it is easy to
understand why park systems would rely on
this method, as quantity is generally easier to
measure than quality. When applied to the five
functionally distinct regions of Kent it provides
an estimate of how easily people can access
park space.
The 2016 Plan provided a new performance
based Level of Service that took into account
the current and potential quality of parks or
trails. Quality was calculated by identiling the
Recreational Value of each asset, the overall
condition of a parkor trail, and then the total
Recreational Value provided by each park or
trail.This new metric provided a quality grade.
When applied to the five functionally distinct
regions of the city it identified the quality of
the park space serving each region.
Comparing and mapping the traditional LOS,
Current Recreational Value, and Potential
Recreational Value of current and yet-to-be
developed parks demonstrates the city's
potential for improving the performance of
its park system for both current and projected
populations.
TYPE OF LOS
Meridion Glen Pork
DEFINITION ---------------- RESUtTINGEMPHASIS
qcqurre
reinvesl
mointoin
developTRADITIONAL
ros
the # oIACRES
dtuded Ll the
POPUTATION
reinvest
oqurre
mointoin
develop
zo
cUrc
fhis is synonymous
with condition.
fhisisinherenilv lied -tolhesizaofa'oork. -
Exomples of oienities:
o orois 6ald.
p!1yground equipment.
o povedpoth.
-
divided by the POPUI.ATION -
utloJdAXA<o
rh" OUALITY
# OF AMENITIES
PERFORMANCE
BASED TO5
This comparison shows that East Hill North
has both the lowest performance-based and
traditional LOS, which indicates an area of the
city that needs both capital reinvestment and
acquisition of additional parkland.
East Hill South and West Hill are the next
lowest-served regions, both in need of
reinvestment to serve their relatively large
populations. West Hill has a high traditional
LOS, or high acres per resident, but due to
freeways and highways bisecting the region, it
lacks easily accessible parks.
Downtown is relatively well served. lts existing
parks are largely older and in need of renewal,
as can be seen in the difference between the
current and potential performance-based
LOS, an area of focus that will be important as
the region continues to densify.
The Green River region is the highest performing region in the city, being
home to a significant trail system, a few large parks, and relatively few
residents. This region serves the entire city with trails and community parks, as
well as serving those who work in the region, population numbers that are not
accounted for in these LOS metrics.
These metrics are a good starting point to identify areas of the city in need of
growth and reinvestment, and they are useful for tracking how LOS has changed
over time. The adjacent chart shows that while traditional LOS has gone down
since 2016 due to population growth with minimal system expansion, the
performance-based LOS has gone up due primarily to capital reinvestment
in the system. lt should be acknowledged that some of the increase to
performance-based LOS can be attributed to fine-tuning the Recreational Value
calculation. Heat mapping, discussed later in this chapter, uses these LOS metrics
to further hone areas in the city that can address access and equity.
LOS by City Region
* Note that city region populations depicted in this chart are roughly based on census Tract data and
do not total to the citywide population number.
Citywide
20t6 202t 2026 203r 2036
Residentio/
Populolion
122,900 136,766 144,658 152,935 161.101
RV --2s9.50 281.28 306.28 331 .28 356.28
Acres *1,095.04 1,072.76 1,072.76 1,072.76 1,072.76
Troditionol LOS:
ocres per 1,000
Residents
8.91 7.84 7.42 7.01 6.66
Performonce-
Bosed IOS:
RV per l,OOa
Residenls
1.62 2.06 2.12 2.17 2.21
ro5
over Time
* Assumes no property acquisition or sal€s
** Assumes st6ady sysiem reinvestment leading to RV increase of 25 points
every 5 years
Citywide By Region
Eost Hill
North
West Hill Eost Hill
South
Down-
lown
Green
River
Iroditiono/ IOS:
Acres per 1,000
7.84 2,52 1',].61 6.13 16.s8 16.35
Current Performonce-8osed LOS:
CRV per 1,000
2,06 0.60 1.71 1,99 4.23 7.98
Polenilol Performonce -8osed IO5;
PRV per 1,000
4.91 2.16 4.68 3.92 11.02 13.42
Acres of Porklond 1,072.76 99.90 252.41 274.90 370.65 74.90
CRV 281,28 23.58 37.15 89.40 94.58 36.58
PRV 671.25 85.50 101.75 't76.00 246.50 61.50
Re si de nliol Po p ulolio n 136,766 39,604 21,737 44,841 22,3s9 4,582
Colculoting the Performonce-Bosed LOS
Current recreational amenities in the system
were counted and assessed for condition, then
each amenity in the system was inventoried in
a geospatial database. Amenities inventoried
included opportunities to play (both
organized sports and unstructured play),
individual support amenities (park shelter,
parking lots or restrooms), opportunities for
walking or biking, significant views, access to
natural landscapes, art, and other more varied
recreational opportun ities (off-leash do9
areas, skate parks, climbing pinnacles, etc.).
Each asset was assessed and given an Asset
Grade that reflected its condition. A grade of 5
represented a new or like-new condition, and
a grade of 1 represented an asset at or very
near the end of its useful life. Each park was
given a Park Property Grade based on a set of
criteria to account for the property's overall
condition, separate from the condition of its
amenities. The Asset Grades for every asset
in a park were averaged, and the resulting
grade averaged with the Park Property Grade
determined the Overall Park Condition grade.
The Overall Park Condition was converted to
a Park Condition Multiplier that was applied
to the park's number of amenities.The result
of this calculation became the park's Current
Recreational Value. Dividing the Current
Recreational Value per 1.000 residents
provides a current LOS for Kent's park system.
STEP I
STEP 2
STEP 3
STEP 4
Arbor Heighrs 360
Wesl Fenwick Pork
AVERAGE ASSET GRADE +
PARK PROPERTY GRADE
divided by2
OVERAtt
PARK CONDITION
PARK CONDITION
MULTIPLIER
X
RECREATIONAT
AMENITIES
CURRENT
RECREATIONAT
VATUE
x
KENT'S POPUTATION
divided by
1000
z
a
z
(J
ooz
!!ozi
LEVEt OF
SERVICE
Current Recreotionol Volue {CRV) ond
Potentiol Recreotionol Volue (PRV)
A measurement ofCurrent Recreational Value
(CRV) was determined for each park and
property in the city's inventory.The resulting
list of 81 parks. trails, and properties can be
sorted and ranked to show the CRV each
contributes to the park system. The CRV of
a park can now be compared to the current
recreational amenities to show how much
Recreational Value (RV) has been lost due
to aging and failing assets and poor park
condition.
The CRV of Kent's park system does not
include the potential of undeveloped
properties, planned park concepts, under-
developed parks, or renovations that
could be made to existing but tired parks.
ln developing Kent's new approach to
measuring LOS, planners understood
that the approach needed to be able to
compare the RecreationalValue of Kent's
existing park system with its Potential
RecreationalValue. Such a comparison could
demonstrate the degree to which existing
parks could be restored or redeveloped to
provide additional Recreational Value to
accommodate population growth. ln this
way, LOS measurements could reflect the
potential value to the system of proposed
improvements to existing properties.
A Potential Recreational Value (PRV)
measurement was created to evaluate
potential amenities that could be built at a
park or property, the natural opportunities
of a park, the feasibility of developing park
amenities, and the potential character ofeach
park site. lt was determined that the best
way to measure PRV was to look at each park
or property and assess typical recreational
amenities that could reasonably be built
there using the same point system used to
calculate current recreational amenities. This
method factors in size, critical areas, location,
and natural features, while also allowing
reasonably accurate comparisons of CRV and
PRV for each park, property, or concept. Kent
Park staffassessed each park, property, and
concept and determined potential recreational
amenities.The resulting list ranked the
city's parks, trails, properties, and concepts
according to their recreational potential.
The comparison of CRV to PRV provides an
indication of the degree to which current
parks are performing to their potential.
Looking at the PRV of undeveloped properties
shows how much the development of these
properties will add to the park system's LOS.
Dividing the CRV per 1,000 residents provides
a current LOS measurement for the park
system, while dividing the PRV per 1,000
residents illustrates its potential LOS.
West Fenwick Pork 2O16 ond 2022 RV
Clork Loke Pork 2016 qnd 2022 RV
2022 CRV
17'55 2022 P
22.50
20'16 RV
7.44
c--2016 RV
2.3
+ 2022 CRY
3.40
2022 PRV
26.00
Understanding what the Recreational Value (RV) score is and how the concept is used is
critical to understanding the performance-based LOS.This discussion centers around the
basis for the formula.
To understand the concept of Recreational Value it is helpful to understand the boundaries
of its use.The most significant boundary is that RV does not attempt to define the complete
value of any given park property or the park system. ln addition to a property's Recreational
Value, park and open space properties provide a wide range of benefits, including
economic value, health value, habitat value, and aesthetic value, as well as a location-based
opportunity to serve populations with highest need.
Recreational Value focuses on recreation. From a recreational perspective, how well a
park serves the community is strongly related to the number and quality of recreational
opportunities it offers.
ln determining Potential Recreational Value, it is implied although not calculated that there
is a recreational'tarrying capacity"for every park that should not be exceeded. For this
planning effort, the appropriate carrying capacity for a park is bound to traditional park
classifications (see discussion later in this chapter) and known limitations to development
such as park size or presence ofsteep slopes, wetlands, or floodplains. As Kent's park5 reach
their development limits and Kent's population increases demands on the system, a formula
to estimate Recreational Carrying Capacity may be needed to inform acquisition strategies.
The inherent carrying capacity or potential score for a large community park is higher
than for a small neighborhood park or open space just because large community parks
have more space to contain more amenities. This diversity in sizes and types of spaces has
been identified as an important aspect ofthe system by the public.To reflect this priority, a
park tier system was created. lf a small neighborhood park or open space property scores
from the mid to hlgh range of its tier, this indicates it is performing its role in an acceptable
fashion. Using this scoring system, small parks or open space properties dont need to
compete with large parks to demonstrate their value to the community.
The formulas presented here are tools to help with resource allocation decisions.The
goal of RV is to help the city make reliable, data-driven decisions when prioritizing capital
investments and other resource allocations'
About Recreotionol Volue
Wesl Fenwick Pork
Pork Orchord Pork
Pork Clossificotions
The system of park classifications is an
important tool park planners and designers
use to help plan, design, and evaluate parks.
Parks are classified based on their size, their
recreational opportunities, and their carrying
capacity. Evaluating a park system by looking
at the number, location, and categories of its
parks helps planners analyze how the system
is serving its community. For example, few
would want a park system made up entirely
of athletic fields or pocket parks. One of the
challenges in parks planning comes from
trying to determine the mix of amenities,
locations, and park sizes to best serve a
community. Using park classifications helps
in the planning process.The traditional
approach to classifying parks utilizes eight
primary categories.
Troditionol Clossifi cotions
Communily Porks: Serves the needs of
the city with unique activities and free or
fee-based programming.These parks have
infrastructure to support all-day use and can
support large gatherings. While these parks
might be walked, biked, or bused to, most
users drive to these parks. These parks draw
people from around the city and beyond and
are typically 10 acres or larger.
Neighborhood Porks; Provides convenient
access to active and passive recreation
opportunities for a neighborhood.These parks
are not intended for all-day use or for large
gatherings. Most users walk or bike to these
parks. These parks are 5-1 0 acres in size.
Specio/ Use: Parks, usually smaller, that don't
fit neatly into other categories. Examples
include urban parks, pocket parks, skate parks,
and tot lots.
O utdoor Recreofiono/ Focilily : Provides
programmed recreational opportunities,
including athletic facilities. Most users drive to
these parks.
Noluro/ Resource/Open Spoce; Largely
undeveloped properties that include open
space, environmentally sensitive areas, and/or
wildlife habitat.
lndoor Recreolionol Focility: Provides social,
cultural and programmed indoor recreation for
the city.
Undeveloped: Properties acquired for park
purposes that have not yet been developed.
Pork Performonce Tier Clossificotions
Traditional park classifi cations provide
effective shorthand for describing each park's
basicjob. To reflect how well they perform
theirjob, an additional categorization tool
called "Park Performance Tiers" is used. These
tiers group parks based on ranges ofCurrent
and Potential Recreational Value scores.
Park PerformanceTiers acknowledge that not
all parks in the system are expected to provide
the same level ofRecreational Value. A high-
functioning neighborhood park, even though it
plays a valued role in the park system, will never
have and is not expected to have the RV of
even a moderately well-functioning community
park. To evaluate how well a given park is
functioning, one must consider its Recreational
Value in the context of its designated tier.
The tier system does not include a
performance cap. Currently Kent's highest
performing parks rank as Tier 6. Depending on
long-range assemblage and redevelopment
opportunities, some of Kent's parks could
eventually achieve even higher rankings.
Trails, undeveloped properties, indoor facilities,
and properties not owned by the city are not
included in the park tier classifications. Each of
these categories can add value to the system
and are considered when analyzing system
connectivity.
"*N ^C...f .""*(.t qo'
-o,3
t--
rJo
{o-
q.@o
€
4lI|
These porks will be the iewels of the Kent pork system.
They ore likely to be port of o pork corridor ond hove
good bike /pedestrion conneclivily.
>17 213
taJ
oo-
.tg
f
E
Eo(,
q)
ti
D
s
o
CLtt|
od
l,lo
f
oood
o
l
oz
lo
&ll|tr
these porks ore high-performing porks, generolly
Community Porks ond Ouidoor Rec Focilities
such os olhlelic fields.
12io<17' 2 I
.:
.U
o
o
e,
o
o?
fo
rt
c,ut
Ihese porks ore performing well ond con include porks of oll
of lhe clossificotions seen in Tiers 5 ond 6. lhis tier will olso
include some high-performing Neighborhood Porks thof fill
service sreo gops, os well os Outdoor Rec Focilities.
7 to <12 919
laJ
oa.
'o
oo
o3
E)'6
z
ct4lrt
Tier 3 porks ore well-functioning Neighborhood Porks,
low-perlorming Community Porks, low-performing
Outdoor Rec Focilities, high-performing undeveloped
porcels, or speciol-use porks like skote or bike porks.
t2 lI>4lo <7
J
L
o
CL
o
-ol-
l
c{
4ul
Tier 2 porks include smoll tot lots, troilheods,
lower-performing Neighborhood Porks, low-performing
Outdoor Rec Focilities, ond high-performing open spoce-
>2lo 4 15 tt
t,lJ
o
o-
oJ\,
oo-
4ul
Tier I porks ore the sysfem's lowest-scoring porks.
They moy include well-performing open spoce or poorly
performing porks in other cotegories.
32 195
Geospotiol Doto ond Heot Mopping
Recognizing that Kent Parks has limited access to geospatial data historically, the Park Planning
and Development (PPD) team made a concerted effort over the last two years to map all park
properties, recreational amenities, and access points into a geodatabase to be utilized during
the current system planning process. Having this data available in GIS has allowed for a deeper
understanding of our system of assets and how they work together as a system.
Geospatial mapping is a tool used by many planners to visualize and analyze geographical
data through Geographic lnformation Systems (GlS).This includes data such as population
density, demographics, topography, transit service, and so on. when combined with metrics
like the performance-based Level ofService, geospatial mapping becomes a powerful tool for
park system planning.
One powerful geospatial mapping tool is called heat mapping. Heat mapping is a way of
layering information on a map to reveal patterns that can guide planning and priorities.The
resulting data is called a "heat map" because a gradient of color indicates priorities which are
often interpreted as "hot" to'told."
The goal of heat maps is to identify high-priority areas for future investments. For this
planning effort there are four heat maps that guide project investments: All Existing Park
Accessn, Existing Community Park Access, Equity, and Park Need maps. Each map is created
using two sets of information: Current RecreationalValue (CRV) and Potential Recreational
Value (PRV). The CRV maps show how the current system is working. The PRV maps show how
the system could work if each park meets its full potentialfor recreation and access, showing
the system functioning at a higher level for the community. The PRV maps also highlight
where access and need cannot be met using only current parkland and where additional
acquisition might be necessary.
x park Access includes all Kent Park properties and trails and the Soos Creek Trail and Green River Natural Resource
Area. These parks were included because they represent significant recreation within the Kent City limits.
Loyers of lnformotion
Various layers of information were used to
create these maps. The collaboration and
input of many city departments was critically
important in building these datasets, and the
datasets are intended to be a living, evolving
resource for all city planning departments
to use in the future. Detailed information on
each dataset used to create the heat maps
can be found in the appendix. An online
resource further explaining and mapping as
data updates are available will be on the Kent
Parks website: mykentparks.com.
Loyers of lnformotion:
Populofion
Areas zoned with multifamily residential land were given the highest
scores, and commercial/industrial were given the lowest scores.
Zoning is as indicated on the City of Kent Zoning Map. lt is anticipated
that the city population will continue to grow, and zoning is a way of
anticipating where densification will occur. Assigning different scores
to areas based on zoning places helps to show more "heat"where the
most people live.
f__l oth",
I Manufacturing or lndustrial
I Commercial/Urban Center
I Single Family Residential
I Multifamily Residential
I Parks
f water
1 mile
N
Rociol ond Sociol Equity
One ofthe four primary functions of parks that make them essential
services to the city and community is that they help to create social
equity and connection. Equity mapping identifies areas of the city
with vulnerable or traditionally underserved populations'This map
includes:
\ Race and ethnicitycharacteristics
\ Socioeconomiccharacteristics
\ Health factors
These datasets were added together to create an overall Racial and
Social Equity lndex map. Areas with higher scores and brighter colors
indicate areas of higher vulnerability and potential opportunities for
equitable investments.
I lo*
I Low-Moderate
I Moderate
f Moderate-High
High
Tronsit Service
Public transit routes and service frequency along those routes
were mapped, acknowledging that frequent transit allows a higher
number of people to easily access parks along transit routes'
** Metro Transit Routes
@Non-Fr.qu"nt Service Areas
Frequent Service Areas
learks
!water
Wolksheds
Park"service areas"were created by mapping the areas that can be
reached within both a 10-minute and 15-minute distance of each park'
Walksheds were created based on the street grid, pedestrian access
points to each park, topography. and other physical barriers that a
person might encounter while walking to their park'
.' :.. J 1o-minute walk
I 1s-minutewalk
I Partt
I w"t"t
1 mile
N
Pork Access Mops
Park Access Maps study existing walking and transit access to
all parks and trails, and the quality ofthe recreation provided
bythose parks and trails.These maps help identify if each
household or worker is within easy access of a park or trail and
within easy access of high-quality amenities. This map includes:
\ ParkAccess:servicearea defined bya 15-minutewalkshedto
pedestrian access points and frequency oftransit service
\ ParkRecreationValue
I Low
I Low-Moderate
I tvtoderate
J Moder"t"-High
Pork Access
Cu rrent Recreotionol Volue
Pork Access
Potentiol Recreoliono/ Volue
I riet'
I Very uish
f, earks
il w.,",
(D
N
1 mile
Reoding the Pork Access Mops:
lf on oreo is dork purple in color, fhe occess io
high-quolity onenity is low.
lf an oreo is yellow in color, ffie occess to high'
quolity omenity is very high.
lond fhot does nol need fo be served by parks
(like city-owned property, weflonds, ond streomsj
is shown in groy.
Pork Need Mops
Park Need mapping was done to study which areas of the city
need park investments the most based on existing park access,
equity, and population density. This map is useful for identifying
if high-need households are within easy access of a park or trail
These maps included:
\ Park Access: Service area defined by a 1 5-minute walkshed to
pedestrian access points and frequency oftransit service
\ ParkRecreationValue
\ Population Density (estimated using Comprehensive Plan data)
\ RacialandSocialEquitylndex
! Low
! Low-Moderate
! tvtoderate
I Mod"r"t"-High
Pork Need
Current Recreofiono/ Volue
Pork Need
P ote nli ol Recreoti o n a I V ol ue
! risi'
ffil very Hish
I earks
I w.,"t
1 mile
N
Reoding the Pqrk Need Mops:
If an oreo is yellow in color, lhe oreo hos lower existing pork
access, higher population density, andr/or serves populolions
with higher vulnerobility. fhese oreos provide the greotesl
opportunity br equitable invesfmenls.
lf the oreo is dork pvrple in color, the areo hos higher existing
park occess, Iower populotion density, and/or serves
populolions with lower vulnerobility.
Heot Mopping Conclusions
The data in these maps was used to inform
a ranked list ofexisting park properties that
have the highest potential impact on access
and equity.These projects are integrated
into the strategic project list. ln addition to
helping identify areas of the city with the
highest need for investments in existing
parks, the Park Access, Park Need, and Racial
and Social Equity heat maps can also be used
to help identify potential areas for property
acquisitions. For example, areas that are
completely outside of the existing walksheds
for a park can be overlaid with the Racial and
Social Equity mapping to identify areas where
acquisition investments might have the
most benefit.
The adjacent diagram shows four areas
in the city that have been identified as
potentials for acquisition investment.
'I
,lt'
_.t.
i.167;
I
jL
ql'--
I
I
\.t'
Eost Hill North
{
!
i'l
, ---i" - ,--'
I:j
., aa
West Hill
l mile
L-I Eost Hill South
N $
Noturol Resources ond Susloinobility
As leaders in building community resilience. Kent Parks connects community members
to environmental programming, ensures healthy ecosystems, advocates for the benefits
of nature, and implements sustainability practices. These priorities have been confirmed
consistently in public engagement, as seen in both the 2020 Comprehensive Recreation
Program Plan and this2022 Park & open space Plan. All departmental strategic planning
efforts look to incorporate environmental sustainability goals wherever possible and
practicah these practices are inherent and intuitive for a parks department and can be further
strengthened through comprehensive planning. ln the next 6-year cycle, Kent Parks will be
creating a departmental sustainability plan to address accreditation expectations and aims
to further reduce our collective impacts on the environment.The plan will establish realistic
goals and metrics for sustainability and resiliency and setup proper systems for tracking
progress and alignment with City and County goals.
Below is a list of major initiatives (not comprehensive) and best practices that Kent Parks is
currently implementing and will continue to grow into the future:
\ Natural Resource Management \
\ Urban Forestry Plan
\ Water conservation \
\ lntegrated Pest Management
\ Sustainable Building/FacilityManagement
\ Composting and recycling at facilities
\ LED lighting conversions
\ Energy consumption audits
\ Centralized HVAC controls
\
Renewable Energy Sources for O&M
Equipment and Vehicles
System Resiliency in Planning, Design and
Construction
\ Reduce stormwater runoffthrough
Green lnfrastructure
\ Natural Resource Preservation
\ Reducing overall O&M demand using
high-quality materials
\ Promotenon-motorized
transportation options through trails
Public Education and Engagement
Wesl
Huse Properly
Noture Score
Much like the active areas of our parks, our
natural areas require maintenance to ensure
they provide opportunities to connect
people to nature, provide quality habitat
for wildlife, keep our water clean, and fight
climate change. Nature Score is the natural
area equivalent of the performance-based
Level of Service for Recreational Value. Using
qualitative data from the 201 0 Green Kent
plan such as acreage, habitat potential. and
presence of sensitive areas like lakes. streams,
or rivers, each of our natural areas was given
a score.Those scores showed that our natural
areas fall into three tiers.
Clork Loke Pork
(,
C'
o
ln
C'
f
oz
These porks hove the highest noturol resource ond hobitot polenliol with
lorge contiguous noturol oreos. Ihese porks tend to include ponds, lokes,
streoms, or rivers, hove the polentiol for solmon or bird hobitot, ond be
contiguous to green corridors. Some city properlies in Tier I include Clork
Loke Pork, Loke Fenwick Pork, Mill Creek Conyon, ond the GRNRA.
'lhese porks hove smoller noturol oreos, lend to hove some
polentiol for hobitot, ond tend to connect lo green corridors.$l
these porks hove some to little noturol oreos ond lower potentiol for hobitot. these porks
tend to noi be contiguous lo green corridors. These siles still hove volue ond mointenonce
needs for our Urbon Forest. Kent Porks is finolizing o Porks Urbon Forest Monogemeni
Plon to foctor this inio worklood plonning for the proposed Noturol Resource group.
o
Nolure Score next steps:
Secure funding: High-quality naturalareas can provide opportunities for people to
experience all ofthe natural benefits of spending time in nature. The ability for people to
spend time in our natural areas depends on two factors:
\ FundingforaNaturalResourcegroupinParkOperationstoensurethatournaturalareas
are safe, free of garbage, and ecologically high functioning. Critical O&M work includes
removing invasive species of plants, planting natives, and maintaining a safe, inviting
network of trails.This funding may allow reinstitution of the volunteer stewards program
and more hands-on community engagement.
\ Capital funding to add amenities that add Recreational Value and protect our natural areas'
Boardwalks and bridges are needed to keep trail users from negatively impacting water
quality where a trail crosses a stream. Trailheads need to have adequate supporting amenities
like parking, restrooms, and shelters to make nature more easily accessible and inviting. Small
outdoor classroom spaces are needed for groups to gather and learn about nature.
lJpdole scoring ond tte to mopping: The Green Kent Plan is 1 2 years old. While it provides
a good jumping-off point for Nature score metrics, reassessment of each site is needed.
Similar to the ongoing asset inventory for park amenities, natural area amenities need to
be inventoried.This will allow for easier management, as well as allow for heat mapping to
ensure equitable access to natural areas is being provided'
Athletic Copocity Study
Kent has long been known as a destination
for sports and athletic programming in the
region and even across the nation, with sports
organizations traveling from every state and
even Canada to use facilities. Historically,
Kent's history of park development focused
on athletic programming, causing some
parks to be limited to this singular use. The
late 90's and early 2000's saw a number
of significant parks built including Wilson
Playfields and Service Club Ballfields. These
gains were paired with the loss of 2 soccer
fields at Hogan Park,3 youth ballfields at
Borden Playfields and a combination of
soccer/baseball fields at Commons Playfields.
Additional plans to add parks to meet
demand from Kent's growing population
were put on hold due to reduced capital and
operating budgets. This ultimately resulted in
a net loss of 3 ballfields and 6 soccer fields.
Although the statisticallyvalid survey results generally show a deemphasis on specialized sports
facilities, Kent Park also recognizes that Athletics are an important amenity in the system and are
a critical part of having a rich diversity ofassets, providing revenue to the budget, and drawing
people from the region to spend time in Kent. Rather than disinvestment in athletics, the survey
suggests a strategic approach to how the department manages these facilities and improved
efficiency with current assets. In an effort to better match athletic field demand with supply, an
Athletic Field Capacity Studywas done as part of the 2022 Kent P&OS Plan.The primary purpose of
this study was to analyze service demands for athletic programming and compare it to the existing
inventory of use hours within the system to determine what strategic improvements can be made
to the existing system and/or ifnew developments are necessary.
Methodology
The Athletic Field Capacity Study includes a detailed analysis of existing reserved athletic field
use over a five-year period. The analysis presents use hours by field. park, and activity/sport.
This provides a comprehensive understanding of existing reserved (known) athleticfield use.
To understand potential unmet needs and demand, an athletic field user survey was deployed
to gather feedback from existing athletic field user groups. Respondents provided insight for
existing demand, typical use patterns, ideas for improvements, and where they travel outside
of Kent to use facilities (if applicable).
Wilson
lnventory
Before examining unmet needs, a more complete understanding of the Kent athletic field
landscape is necessary. Kent PRCS is not the only provider for these services as the school
district manages a large inventory of athletic fields.
Kent Porks
Kent Parks primarily utilizes seven park locations that offer athletic fields. Fields include large
and small soccer fields, football fields. softball fields, and baseball fields. Additionally, some
fields are natural turfwhereas others are synthetic turf; however, synthetic turffields tend to
be lined/designed for multiple purposes, but multiple activities occurring at once at the same
location may be limited due to field layout. Kent Parks also has some lit fields while others
are unlit. The turf type (natural or synthetic), playability (the ability to play multiple sports at
the same time), and field lighting all have a profound effect on Kent Parks'ability to provide
athletic fi eld programming.
Kenf Schoo/ Disfricf
The Kent School District (KSD) comprises 29 elementary schools, six middle schools, and four
high schools.The majority offer some type of athletic field facility(s). Moving forward, KSD will
be offering synthetic fields at high schools, and is examining that same feasibility at middle
schools. There is an upcoming KSD bond (2023/24) that may focus on enhancing all high
school facilities to minimum standards of play which should assist with this direction.Wilson PIoyfields
Wilson
Generol Trends
From 201 5-201 9, the greatest number
of reservations are attributed to Wilson
Playfields (43olo). The second most are
attributed to Hogan Park (28olo), followed
by Service Club (12o/o), and Kent Memorial
Park (1 0olo). lnterestingly, Hogan Park has
almost the same number of reserved hours
on average as Wilson Playfields, mostly
attributed to a longer average number of
hours per reservation (5.4 vs. 3.6). Wilson
Playfields, Kent Memorial Park, and Hogan
Park have all experienced positive trends in
reservations and hours used from 2015-2019.
Glenn Nelson Park has received the strongest
decline over the same time period.
The individual fields within the park system
receiving the greatest number of reservations
and hours used on average are Rectangular
Field #1 and #2 located atWilson Playfields.
Field #1 at Hogan Park ranked third in
reservations and hours used on average.
These three fields are synthetic turf.
Hogon Pork
2018 20192At5201620t7Locdlon
10 2 ri t4 -sar6 7i562
2A%511 990 904 7to 4a94610s35
72%7091771175329399261232
s3 -81%4%140 96 57 63 70 €7291319301257v93oo i 3os
55 -10ct6 2%75 66 54 87
1.372 1.098 5?'%43%902 963 1,058 1,193
Use Trends by Spori
With the Kent Parks field reservation
nomenclature used between 2O1 5-201 9,
adult soccer (1 7olo), parks adult softball (160lo),
youth soccer (1 0olo), and parks youth baseball
(10olo) represent a little over half of all athletic
field reservations on average each year.
Positivelytrending sports field reservations
from 201 5-201 9 include Kent School District
sports (baseball, soccer, and softball), Kent
Parks sports (youth flag football, youth soccer,
and youth baseball), youth soccer, and adult
baseball. Negatively trending sports field
reservations over the same time period
include parks adult softball, parks youth
baseball, youth baseball, and youth softball
tournaments.
When combining all like sport activities
together (regardless of organization), adult
softball has the most reserved hours from
201 5-2019 with 1 3,490. The least number
of hours are attributed to lacrosse (561 ) and
rugby (83). When looking at the field use by
hours, prime time (weekdays 5-1 1 p.m. and
weekends 9 a.m.-9 p.m.) is utilized the most
by all sports. Adult softball, youth baseball,
and youth soccer have the most prime time
use in general.
2o'a 2019m1520162017Acdvlty
6t483246206AAt29M90114
-1oo%e103310
M10
@1Ili 0
7 trt4
5 I EA
71%414 480 400 4t5 7%375 404
7g%1943,1 39 16 249,o
-109i 2!l404t50554961
26 t9186261
64i s9 s%291:61 63 52 56
-$84 el38
62 732 47 6500%2042to
81 114 tzti s vt
tx24259222850%2 3
397 -29x t6X396417413315443
7 367j{,a9(3 2 13 4 14
21 2t ,t%t%24 2l 21 18
291 262 2?9 42r^1@l297207138
16 qsi 22 t6s%Iq171814
91%79t139156275177
'44
140
60%49(7a 58 r06 134 92u
0 0.oft1
-71%691321t2a9210193 i 147
160 93 4911284150
14 1a t4 20X tgl15l1t4ri o ot
2%7a 15 41 -100x5260
0'x137106
t22%IMl't 752 332 412 252186
7%3%74 75 118 791 u74
?7 53 -2314 zo48566560
Summory ond Conclusions
Studying athletic capacity in the park system
is a balance offour things:
\ lnitial and cyclical redevelopment
costs of fi elds/amenities
\ Ongoing costs ofoperations
and maintenance
\ Amount of use
\ Revenuefrom reservations +
community economic benefi ts
Servlce Ciub Bo/ifields
Examples of this balance include:
\ lf the amount of use on a site is too high, operations and maintenance will not be able to
keep pace to sustain the site. The site may become too damaged and need to shut down
to renovate, interrupting the schedule of athletic programming and losing revenue costs
and community economic benefits.
\ Time and money invested into a site needs to be reflected by the number of reservation
hours. For example, the number of hours spent preparing a natural turf and skinned
infield for a game are more than the number of hours to prepare a synthetic turf field for
a game. The amount of operational time devoted to a field is only justified by optimal use
and revenue.
\ This is a system-wide balance. Not all sites bring in revenue, but these sites can be
important for drop-in use. The costs of these sites need to be factored into this balance.
Wesl Fenwick Pqrk Multi-Use Court
North Meddion Pork
A high-level look at balancing cyclical
development and operations and
maintenance costs indicates a rough similarity
in 16-year costs between natural turfand
synthetic fields that can be further balanced
by the six month per year increase of use and
revenue that a synthetic field would bring in
Kent's rainy climate.
An in-depth look at the amount of reservation
use each site receives can be deceiving since
the system currently does not provide an
equal number of playfields for all sports,
some of which are overlays of diamond and
rectangular. lncluding overlapping fi elds, the
park system provides six full-sized softball
fields, three full-sized soccer fields, and two
full-sized baseball fields. ln general, rectangular
fields are underrepresented in the system.
The user group survey indicates that more
rectangular field users have been turned away
due to lack of playing fields than diamond
field users.The user group survey identified
youth soccerwith a high representation,
which can be accommodated on a variety of
fields, and adult soccer represents the highest
percentage of reservations in the system, but
is accommodated on only three fields.This
rectangular field trend is also supported by
benchmarking against NRPA for similarly sized
cities, which recommends seven full-sized
soccer fields, five full-sized softball fields, and
four full-sized baseball fields for a city the size
of Kent.
Cricket is currently not represented in the
system and is a challengingly large field
to accommodate that does not fit into the
rectangular and diamond field categories. lt
is recommended to launch a practice pitch
trial run on existing lawn spaces that can
accommodate use with minor improvements;
if use demand proves to exist, sites have
been identified that can be used for formal
improvements.
Easeball (adult)
Baseball (youth)
cricket
Fastpitch (youth)
Flag tootball (youth)
Lacrosse
Rugby
5occer (adult)
Soccer (Youth)
softball (adult)
other (camps or tournaments)
Arhletic Field Survey:
Sport/Acriviry Represented by Respondent
n=90
Athleric Field Survey:
Primory Field Type Urilized by Respondent
n=86
Diamond fields Rectangular fields
ae/o
7tr/o
6Wo
sff/o
4Vo
3ea
2e/"
1e/.
o%
oo/" 1tr6 2VA 3e/o Ae/o 5e/o 6v4
w
M
YII
There are a few ways of adding lacking amenities while supporting important existing
reservation use and emphasizing operations and maintenance:
\ Convert natural grass fields to synthetic where possible to increase reservations and
decrease O&M burden
\ Alter existing field layouts and use:
\ Strategically schedule youth sports (soccer, baseball, etc.) on smaller fields to free up
larger fields.
\ change fields from one use type to multi-use with field overlay to accommodate shifts
in sports trends (example: baseball and soccer overlay)
\ conduct pilot projects to test demand for emerging athletic trends like cricket, rugby
and lacrosse.
\ Explore marketing drop-in use and pick-up games to attract users who may have
barriers that prevent them from participating in league play.
\ Extend daily and yearround use time on existing fields:
\ Add or upgrade lighting, including automated timers to reduce O&M costs
\ Upgrade natural turf to syntheticturf
\ Add fields to the system:
\ Partner with school district for use hours, maintenance efficiency, and joint-
development of new facilities, especially at locations that can accommodate weekend
tournament use
Strategic projects include adding year-round use to already popular sites, shiftlng use
away from sites that are not cost feasible to develop, continuing to actively pursue school
partnerships for field use in non-school hours and joint-developed facilities, and transitioning
fields to more universal uses. There are projects that should be tackled in the near term, and
larger projects that should be assessed in the next six-year cycle dependent on usage trends
and partnerships.
Art Wilght Field al Kenl Memoriol Pork
Studying the System
Viewing the park system through a variety of
metrics creates a picture of how the system
is functioning and where improvements are
needed:
\ National standards provide a high-level
understanding oftrends in the country;
engagement and the Athletic Capacity
Study balance the national metrics with
city-specific information to verify and
identify amenities for investment.
\ Performance-based Level ofService
measurements indicate how well
existing parks are serving their area of
the city, while traditional Level of Service
shows where access to parkland maY
be deficient. Heat mapping adds a level
of precision to both of these metrics,
targeting areas of the city where new
projects and access are most needed.
\ lmplementing Park Classifications and
Nature Scoring ensures a diverse system
that provides a variety of space types.
Each metric is a data-driven tool for viewing
different aspects of the system, helping
planners measure and more accurately
describe the current performance of the
city's park system and provide a reference
point for decision making. These tools inform
a list ofstrategic projects that respond to a
diversifying and densifying Kent.Lake Meridion Pork
y1 w i�i'� •,� _
or
-wr
90
- .., '•., f:� ,r ;,• o',. ode � t �,
f. `..�4 Fri P i S ! rl ��
Ar
rAlt
+ r
ri 1
00,
Ile If
"ON
��•/"� i Jam' ��% fr '_f^'
aw �' �I ;�►'� !•/fir: �. �
�� �r ,/��� J, f/` :+ f' •Y %�%!�—e,R�by:!Cs'i� i A •,r .\ •:�� � •j1r��r,°,Y.h
..,� '-�rJfL •iS7V�I����7�iT�i 7 _ L r..s � 'sf .yr�y��,
_ .F w. - _ - _ - - - = 1. �\�. E-`7•
Where We Are Going
Vision and Goals
Project Outcomes
Strategic Projects
Systemwide inificWves
Systemwide Operational and Maimenance Needs
Citywide Connections
Downtown
West H10
Green River
1=asi Hilf South
rrast '!-lilf North
Strote.gic Projects 5urninory
chapter
04
K E N T
P&4S
PLAN
2022
65
67
68
69
71
73
77
81
83
87
90
The vision ofthe 2022 P&OS Plan is to create a system that responds to the needs ofthe diverse population
of Kent today and in the future, building community trust and ownership in the process. To achieve that
vision, the plan is built around four goals, which inform nine project outcomes.
Gools
Tronsporency ond
Communicotion
We aim to create easily
accessible information about the
park system, build constituent
trust, and be transparent in our
decision-making process to share
how projects are identified.
Strategies:
\ Enhanceaccessto
information about the
park and trail system and
individual properties
using virtual and physical
platforms
\ Build upon the 2016
performa nce-based
approach
\ Use mapped data and
analysis to identii/ projects
\ Engage the public and
partner with communitY-
based organizations
PhysicolAccess
for All
we aim to create a system that
has easy access to parks from
home and work. To do this,
studies of street infrastructure,
density, racial and social indices,
park access points, and transit
routes were incorporated into
data-based mapping.
Strateg ies:
\ Provide access to parks
throughout the city using
both existing parks and new
facilities
\ Promote access to parks
by non-motorized means
looking toward citywide
infrastructure planning
\ lntegrate densitY and social
indices into data-based
mapping and analysis
Diversity of High-
Quolity Amenity
we aim to create a system that
provides high-quality amenities
that reflect the diversity of Kent.
Public engagement identifi ed
which amenities are needed and
not needed in the system, and
provided guidance on where
these amenities are needed.
Strategies:
\ Provide an equitable sPread
of high-quality amenities.
including natural resources
and athletics throughout the
city using existing Parks, new
facilities, and partnerships
\ Create a park system that
reflects Kent's diversity
with parks that are special,
unique, and authentic
System
Relif iencr
We aim to create a resilient,
sustainable park system.
Funding, partnerships.
operations, and maintenance
are key components to ensuring
the system provides high-
functioning amenities within a
budget that can be sustained.
Strateg ies:
\ Add Recreational Value to
transform existing low-
performing parks and
existing parks where high-
quality amenities are lacking
\ Transition Recreational
Value data into an asset
management system for
long-term management
\ Focus on sustainable O&M
funding for new and existing
park development
\ Partner with external
organizations to Provide
high-quality amenities
The 2022 P&OS Plan is organized around nine project outcomes that together achieve the vision for Kent's park
system. These outcomes were identified through public engagement and park system evaluation, support the four
goals, and provide a structure to prioritize strategic projects as funding becomes available.
Proiect Outcomes
Access
A project that
increases the service
area ofthe park
system. Projects might
include improving
access to an existing
park or adding an
entirely new park.
Strotegic
Amenities
A project that adds
diversity of amenity
to Kent and amenities
identified as important
through engagement.
Portnerships
A project that
leverages agreements
with other city
departments, projects,
or entities outside of
Kent Parks to mutual
benefit.
Equity
A project identified
as important through
heat mapping that has
opportunity to serve
priority populations.
Troils
A project that
increases or enhances
trails and connectivity.
Athletics
A project that
addresses capacity
needs for various
sports, including
organized,
programmed, and
drop-in use.
Progromming
A project that brings more
activation to a space.
Projects incorporate arts,
culture, and outdoor
programming and
may include spaces for
movies, music, or mobile
furnishings.
Operotions &
Mointenonce
A project that makes
maintaining or operating
the park system more
efficient. Projects might
include replacing
infrastructure that needs
constant upkeep.
Nqturol
Resources
A project that
increases access to
nature and enhances
environmental
sustainability.
T
o
0
N
Sfrotegic Froiecls
This plan proposes a list of strategic
projects to achieve Kent's Parks and Open
Space vision. Projects are guided by public
engagement, data-based system studies,
and realistic system opportunities for
partnerships, maintenance, and fund ing.
ln this report, projects are organized by city
region and categorized by outcome. Studying
projects by outcome shows how projects
work together to create a cohesive, d iverse
system; studying projects by region shows
how to create a city-wide balance of high-
quality amenity.
Citywide, projects are sorted into three
priority buckets: near term, mid term, and
long term. Projects are scored for priority
based on potential of the project to enhance
the system and ease of implementation.
Scoring includes the number of outcomes
the project achieves, the LOS ofthe region
they reside in, and ease of implementation
or associated costs.These priority buckets
establish a guide for implementation and
are not intended to be a rigid schedule or
order for projects to be completed. Project
prioritization will be revisited annually
through the capital budgeting process and is
subject to change based on available funding,
asset deterioration, leveraging opportunities,
and staff resources.
Prioritizotion ond Complexity
neor: Near-term projects are either currently
underway or targets for the next six year
budget cycle.
mid: Mid-term projects are not currently
funded but are good candidates for future
funding.
long: Long-term projects are not currently
funded and have barriers to implementation
such as O&M funding and property acquisition.
Mid and long-term projects may become
more feasible as appropriate funding becomes
available and partnerships progress, or may
have aspects that can be accomplished in the
near term.
S-$$S, Level of complexity and effort
associated with a particular scope of work is
tied to anticipated project costs, indicated for
each project as a range from $ to $$$.
. ,*..*.,,*,"*-,{E}{ ur ),',
Systemwide I nif iotives
Some strategic projects have been identified that do not yet have a site or are systemwide projects.
These might include specific amenities, partnerships, or signage projects that would help achieve
the vision ofthe Parks and Open Space Plan.
Updote Portnership with
Kent School District
Update formal agreement with Kent School
District for use and management of facilities.
Develop after-hours partnerships with
schools for athletic facility use, playgrounds,
and other amenities. Partnership
opportunities might include: North Meridian
Park/Meridian Middle School, Campus Park/
Kent-Meridian High School, and Kentridge
High School.ooooo o*
Enhonce Access to lnformotion
Provide park and trail maps at strategic
locations throughout the city to spread
understanding of nearby available amenities
and connections, and continue enhancements
of online updates and interactive mapping.oo
Off-leosh Dog Areos
Test various locations for off-leash dog areas
that are separated from active or residential
use and have natural features that do not need
long runs of fence. Public input will identify
the best long-term location for this use. Sites
to explore include Briscoe, Riverview Russell
Woods, and Foster Parks.oo
lnstoll o Sploshpod
ldentify a favorable operating location for
above-ground water play in the park system,
a unique amenity in the system.
o
Pickleboll
Add pickleball court lines to existing tennis
courts, and install new pickleball-specific courts.ooo
Mountoin Bike Porkr/Pump Trock
Provide a high-quality bike park/pump track
in the park system, potentially partnering
with Evergreen Mountain Bike Alliance.oo
Noture Troil Access & Mqintenonce Plon
Develop and implement a plan to enhance
trail experience for users, with emphasis on
maintenance, safety, and access to nature.ooo
Cricket Pitch
Designate a location for a practice pitch and
identify if there is a need for a permanent
formal pitch. Sites to explore for a practice
pitch include city-owned sites such as
Riverview Parkand North Meridian Park,
and non-city-owned sites such as Pea Patch
Playfields and Kentridge High School. Sites to
explore for a formal pitch include Valley Floor
Community Park and new land acquisitions.oo
Sysfemwide Operotionql ond Mointenqnce Needs
Capital reinvestment into Kent's park system as outlined in this plan will require a consistent increase in park's operating budget to meet
systemwide O&M needs. Additional staff will be needed to keep up with an increase in park use, operational need and preventative maintenance.
A number of operational and maintenance needs have never been funded at the necessary level. Others are emerging needs due to added
complexities of managing a park system that did not exist in the past, and opportunities to leverage partnerships, volunteers or modernization.
@@@@@66@#
Modernize Porks Wqsle Monogement Noturol Resource MonogemenlSustoinoble Replocement
for Seosonol Stoff
Seasonal staff have long been a cornerstone
of responding to the increase in park use
and expanding service and support during
the spring and summer. These positions are
increasingly harder to hire, train and retain
as park use continues to increase demand
for evening and weekend staff presence. A
sustainable change in strategy is necessary.
This requires either additional resources
or a reduction in park operating hours,
locking/unlocking of parking lot gates, and
the number of restrooms that are opened
and closed daily. Other park amenities or
programs with high operating costs should
be considered for reduction to preserve core
park operations.oooooooo€3
Waste management is a crucial part of
providing inviting, attractive public spaces
and as the amount of garbage in our public
spaces continues to increase sustaining
service levels is challenging. Currently the
Parks Department is responsible for emptying
almost 400 garbage cans across the 34 square
miles of Kent every week. Some of these cans
must be emptied multiple times a day while
some require emptying only every week or
two. A variety of strategic investments are
available to manage the amount of staff time
required to collect garbage in our parks.
These could include a direct-to-dump pickup,
higher volume receptacles, smart cans, on-
site dumpsters at high volume parks, at-grade
dumpsters at East/West Shops and carry-
inlcarry-out litter policies and marketing
campaigns.ooooooooap
Fund a natural resource group in Park
Operations to manage public use of open
space, nature trails and support environmental
community engagement/education. lnitial
focus on Kent's urban forest and natural areas
prioritizing tier 1 natural areas including
natural areas along the Green River, Lake
Fenwick, Clark Lake and Mill Creek Canyon.OOOO OOO{:.:
Volunleer Progrom Coordinotor
Hire volunteer program coordinator to
leverage volunteers and partnerships to help
maintain Kent's publicly accessible natural
areas. Restart Adopt-A-Park program that
was canceled due to budget cuts several
years ago. Hold regular cleanup events
to help keep Kent clean and build a sense
of community pride in our public spaces.
Update Green Kent Management Plan and
explore restarting the park steward program
if resources allow.OOOOaOOOS;
Business Developmen t / Gront Writer
Hire business development/grant writer
to increase the department's leveraging of
existing funding. Consolidate department
grant writing and responsibility tracking. Reach
out to city businesses to encourage investment
in attracting people to work/live in Kent.oooaooooo
lncreosed Public Access to School
Grounds
ln collaboration with local school districts, find
ways to increase access to school grounds for
recreation and recreational programming in
high need areas of Kent. Joint use agreement
could look at adding staff to manage after school
hours/school year access to school grounds,
address garbage or provide programming.
Could expedite increasing recreational value in
underserved areas ofthe city.aoooo oo
Pork Rongers
Create Park Ranger program to improve park
code enforcement, red uce enforcement
burden on Police Department, improve
public understanding of park rules and
increase public perception of park safety.
A ranger program would improve the
department's ability to react to park use
issues outside of regular working hours and
reduce reliance on seasonal staff.oaooooooa
1 mile
Citywide Connections
On- and off-street trails or multimodal routes
create important connections between people
and their destinations, including parks. Often
the combined value ofan interconnected set
of trails, parks, and amenities creates synergies
for a corridor that is greater than the sum
of its parts. Understanding these strategic
connections, both on and off street, can be
an important consideration when identifuing
projects that have multiple components-
pa rks, trails, transportation, stormwater
drainage or utilities.
Kent has 50+ miles of trail ranging in character
and design type from paved regional trails to
soft -surface nature trails. When considered
individually, these trails have limited impact
in connecting people to places. But when
these trails are intertwined into an active
transportation system, they become an
important part of citywide connections.To
this end, a multi-departmental effort (Parks,
PublicWorks, Economic and Community
Development) was initiated during the recently
adopted Transportation Master Plan (TMP) and
resulted in the identification of many important
bicycle and pedestrian improvements. The
Citywide Connections map is intended to be
a continuation ofthe efforts started during
the TMP to leverage linkages between trails
and on-street infrastructure that can serve as
opportunities to serve multiple goals.
{
Cifywide Connections Mop
Looking toward next steps in this planning
effort, Kent Park is proposing developing
an Urban Trails Master Plan that looks at
regional trails, park trails, and on-street
trails"as part of an interconnected network
of urban trails that provide an expansion
of the non-motorized options for people
to navigate the city. This effort will be led
by Kent Park but will follow the tone of
collaboration established during the TMP
K"y
-
On-Sheet Troils: Jhese lroils ore pori of the sheet- - - n"i*ork ond con be sidewolks, bike lones, shored-
use polhs, cycle kock, or some other lronsportolion
solulion thot cenlers on bicyclists ond pedeslrions.
Doshed lines ore in progress or in plonning; solid
lines ore complete.
(* Pork Troils: fiese troils con be poved or soft surfoce
(grovel or dirt) ond typicolly move through o pork seiling
(neighborhood, communify, or nolurol resource).
(J Regionol Troils:'lhese lroils ore typicolly poved,
l2 feet wide, ond ore considered port of the King
County/Leofl ine regionol koils network.
I
ff
l.r
Federol Woy Link Exfension Troil: Sound Transit is currently under
construction on the FederalWay Link Extension, which will bring Light
Rail connections south of Angle Lake into Kent, Des Moines, Federal
Way, and eventually into Fife and Tacoma.The result will be major
improvements in access to transit for the West Hill and an expected shift
toward transit-oriented development and greater population density that
comes with it. To improve neighborhood access to these transit stations,
a trail that generally foltows the light rail alignment is proposed.
Citywide: Bike/Ped. Corridors Around the city, there are segments
of sidewalk and bike lanes missinq. These gaps and inconsistencies in
the system make it unattractive and difflcult for users and can result
in unsafe conditions. As urbanization and traffic levels increase, street
improvements need to provide comfort and safety for pedestrians and
cyclists. Filling these gaps would provide pedestrian and bicyclist access
to transit and destinations such as schools, parks, and neighborhood
shopping. Conidors that have been identified for improvements include:
\ East Hill: 1 16th Ave.5E, 132nd Ave. SE, 100th Ave. SE
\ East Hill South and Downtown: SE 256th St., SE 248th St.
\ West Hill: Reith Rd., Veterans Drive, Military Rd.
\ Downtown:CentralAve.
\ Green River: S 228th St., S 21 2th St., S 1 96th st.
[)<:wnfown ond Eost Hil/ Soufhr
Mill Creek Cctnyon Pork Corridor ond Downtown Connecfions
Nearly 40 years ago, Kent took a bold step by combining stormwater
infrastructure, a park, and art to create Earthworks Park at the base of Mill
Creek Canyon. This bold step was part of a vision to transform Miil Creek
Canyon into the jewel of Kent's park system with trails, bridges, and other
recreational amenities throuqhout. lt was an ambitious goal for what
was at that time a small city. After all these years, Kent has grown into
this vision and is ready for Mill Creek to meet its enormous recreational
potential. Doing so will make Mill Creek Canyon a top-tier park and form
a vital linkage between the East Hill and downtown.
Citywide lnitiotive: Neighborhood Greenwoys Progrom
There are many very low traffic neighborhood streets with no sidewalks
in Kent.This program looks at making those streets pedestrian-centric
experiences. Focus would be on streets that connect to parks or other
amenities for the surrounding neighborhood.
Downtown, Green River, and West Hill: Kent Vctlley Loop Trail
Decades ago, city leaders laid out a vision for a network of parks along
both sides of the Green River that were to be connected by separated bike/
pedestrian trails. Today this vision has been adapted into the Kent Valley
LoopTrail system, which is mostly complete and is a regional draw for park
users, bikers, runners, and walkers. Ensuring that the Green RiverTrail, Frager
Road, lnterurban Trail, and the parks throughout the conidor are maintained
and updated is critical for a key component of Kent's park system.
Downtown ond Green River: Meel Me on Meeker
Public Works, Economic and Community Development, and the Parks
Department are collaborating to implement a new vision for Meeker
Street. This project is transforming a key commercial corridor and
gateway to downtown into a multimodal, urban complete street with
a strong sense of place. Meeker Street will also serve as an east west
bike/pedestrian connection between downtown, the lnterurban Trail,
and the Green RiverTrail. ln conjunction with the Central Park, Uplands,
lnterurban, and Earthworks improvements, this connection will increase
Kent's downtown as an area attraction.Eost Hill: Lake Meridion Pork, Huse Property, ond Soos CreekTroil Corridor
Lake Meridian Park is currently Kent's most popular park. The Huse
Property is in planning to become a top-tier community park in the
underserved Panther Lake region. These two parks are located along King
County's Reqional Soos CreekTrail. When improvements are completed,
Kent will have two top-tier parks connected by a comfortable bike ride on
the Soos CreekTrail.
Wesf Hill and Downfown: Fenwick Park Corridor
Enhancing and providing formal connections between West Fenwick and
Lake Fenwick Parks will create a dynamic park corridor with numerous
passive and active recreational opportunities with trail access to the West
Hill, Green River, Kent Valley Loop Trails, Meeker Street, and downtown.
72
Downfown SlloteSic Profectl
The Downtown Region is the commercial center of Kent.
Its current population is relatively small but is expected to
grow significantly over the next decade in the form of more
urban, multifamily housing. Downtown is an important
intersection between the Green River valley, East Hill, and
West Hill and is vital to Kentt strategic vision for the future,
becoming a thriving mix of retail, business, and residential.
A destination itself, the center connects all Kent residents
and workers to transit (Sounder) and active transportation
(lnterurban Trail). Woven through downtown are a number
of parks that were created to serve a small town and, later, a
suburban Kent. Most ofthe downtown parks are some ofthe
system's oldest. Reinvestment is needed to replace failing
assett provide quality recreational experiences, serve a high
weekday population. and play a key role in supporting the
development of a livable, urban downtown core.
Proiect Outcome Key
@
@
Access
Equiry
Strotegic Amenities
Progromming
Athletics
Troils
Noturol Resources
Operotions & Moinlenonce
Portnersh ips
J cotl"g"
i t-tigt's.hoot
i miadt" s.troot
i Elementaryschool
I KentParks
Downtown Mop
'i niile
N
Eorthworks ond Mill Creek Conyon
Middle Mill Creek Pork
\ Createa newTier4park,including resting point
at the halfi^/ay point ofthe canyon.
Soufh Mtll Creek Pork
\ Renovate to become a Tier 4 park. lmprove gateway/trailhead to the
upper canyon utilizing recent property acquisition.
Mill Creek Canyon Troils
\ Continue work on pedestrian connection between downtown and East
Hill on both sides ofthe canyon.
\ Create crossings to connect Scenic Hill and East Hill. Crossings to include
bridges at strategic locations for connectivity and views of the canyon'
\ Continue work on restoration of canyon and working with Earthcorps on
trail maintenance and improvement.
Mill Creek Conyon to 249th
\ Create a safe off-street connection between 248th, Campus Park, and
Mill Creek Canyon.
Mill Creek Pork to 277th Streel Iroil
\ lmplement the planned connection to 277th, eventually connecting Mill
Creekto the Green RiverTrail.
A.4th ond Willis Greenwoy n".. $f
Redevelop the two greenways along
SR 51 6 with enhanced landscape and
multimodal connection between the
lnterurban Trail and downtown.oa o o o
B. Commons Neighborhood Pork n.'o,. $$
Move the current Community Garden
program to this site. Update the
playground and improve the trail
experience in the park.ooo o
C. Kherson Pqrk ,.e.'r $$
Construction is planned for 2022,
including installation of the lunar rover
replica in the space-themed playground
and improved urban green space.ooo o
D. Eorthworks n.e" $$$
ond Mill Creek Conyon
Celebrate this natural resource and gateway
between downtown and East Hill. Update
the master plan for Earthworks Park and Mill
Creek Canyon with a major emphasis on trail
and neighborhood connectivity, building
upon the recent work to cleanup and restore
existing nature trails within the canyon.aaoo oo Eorlhworks Pork
Kenl Volley loop lroils:
Connecling lhe Downlown, Green
River, ond Wesl Hill regions, ihis
hoil system utilizes on- ond o{f-
streel koils lo connect porks ond
creole recreoiionol loops.
Complete ond Continue Enhqncements lo
the Kent Volley Loop Troil (KVLT) System
Frooer Rd froi/ Restinq Areo oko BMX Pork -
WJst Uill
\ Enhance the existing amenities and add new
at this resting point along the trail system.
64th Ave lroi/ Repoir ond Fxfension - Downtown
\ Repair and extend this existing trail to enhance
the KentValley Loop Trail.
lnterurbon Troil lmprovemenis - Downfown ond
Green River
\ Enhance connection at Naden Avenue.
\ Enhance lighting at all Downtown connections.
\ Add art installations, improve crossings, and
coordinate repair work with King County.
Neoly/ Soomes - Downfown
\ Develop amenities and enhance recreational
opportunities in this area along the loop trail
system.
Green River lroil South Missing Link to Auburn -
Downtown
\ Fill the missing link of the Green RiverTrail south
in partnership with King County.This trail will
eventually connect south to Auburn.
Froger Rd - West Hill ond Downtown
\ lmprove this currently mixed-use roadway to be
welcoming to bicycle and pedestrian users. The
segment from Cottonwood Park to Washington
Avenue is an area of priority along this road.
I
I
0
N
E. Fosfer Pork 'r'r'i li
lmprove trailhead and trailside amenities.
lmplement pilot off-leash dog area
program.oao
F. Russell Woods Pork ','i':j lr
lmprove trailheads and amenities at this
property along the loop system.oo
G. Old Fishing Hole 1l
lmprove trailheads and amenities at this
property along the loop system.oo o o
H. Uplonds Ployfield ond 'r;r'l i:r
Uplonds Exlension Renovotion
\ Convert two natural grass baseball fields
into an active park space.
\ Expand Lions Skate Park.
\ Add a new lnterurban Trailhead and trail
amenities.oo oo a
l. Downtown Pork lmprovements r":'r :; ,;.1
Update downtown parkamenities and
look for potentials to add recreational
value where appropriate. Potential parks
include Kaibara Park, Burlington Green,
Titus Railroad Park, Rosebed Park, and First
Ave Plaza.oooo o
J. Riverview Pork 'i,r,i l;i;
Create a new Tier 5 park that serves as
downtown's Green River trailhead and southern
anchor for the Green River corridor of parks.o oo oo t
K. Signoture Pointe 'rri':i ::':':,
Finish this last segment of the Green River
Trail that needs improvement to be off-
street, separated trail.o o oo I
L. Scenic Hill Pork
Renovate and expand children's play area
and add additional features to improve
recreational value.o ao
M. Downtown Centrol Pork 'r":'1 r''; J
Development
Locate and create a high Recreation Value
downtown central park.oaoo
N. Hogon Pork ot Russell Rood ;,-,r1 .,ti.i
Add supporting recreational amenities that
will make the park a dawn-to-dusk, year-round
recreational destination. Convert Field #2 to
synthetic turfand assess trends to determine
if additional synthetic fields are needed. Add
automated lighting controls. lmprove trail
connections from the Park.o oo oo
O. Kenf Memoriol Pork i':"',:: ;j :':
lmprove connections to neighborhoods
and embrace the bordering creek as an
amenity. Add automated lighting controls.
Reassess use after school partnerships and
other sports facility improvements have
been achieved and consider options for
general park use and open space in lieu of
athletic programming.ooo ooo
P. Town Squore Plozo :", j
Renovate Town Square Plaza to provide
improved access to green space and
programmable space downtown.oo o
west Hift strolesfl P1"!":l:
West Hill is primarily residential with ribbons
of commercial development along Pacific
Highway and portions of Military Road. lt is
bisected by lnterstate 5. Development near
the in-progress FederalWay Link Extension
and future light rail station continues to
significantly increase the population and
development of this region with available
parkland becoming scarcer. Freeways,
highways, topography, and the Green River
create challenges for connectivity within this
region and to other areas ofthe city. The West
Hill of Kent has the fewest number of parks
but has more acres of parkland per person
than every region except downtown.
Proiect Outcome Key
Access
Equiry
Slrolegic Amenities
Progromming
Athletics
Troils
Nqlurol Resources
Operotions & Moinlenonce
Portnerships
^:":I Higl's.l,oot
I miaat"s.hoot
J Elementaryschool
I KentParks
West Hill Mop
l mile
N
A. Lindo Heights Pork ir':r' ir"j
lmprove RecreationalValue by adding open lawn
area, loop trail, and multi-use sports court.o o o*
B. Solt Air Visto Pork ,,,,,,, i'.
Renovate and expand children's play area and
add additional features to improve recreational
value. Add nature-play and nature trail
connections to multifamily housing.oao ooo
C, Connect West Fenwick ond i L
Loke Fenwick Porks
Provide formal connections between these parks
to create a dynamic park corridor with numerous
active and passive recreational opportunities
with trail access to the West Hill, Green River, and
Downtown. Work with Evergreen Mountain Bike
Alliance to create Kent's first mountain bike park.o oo
D. Connect West Fenwick Pork t't ':' ,
to the Green River Troil
lmprove pedestrian connection from West
Hill to the Green RiverTrail and downtown.
Collaborate with Public Works to address
crossing SR 51 6, as identified in the
Transportation Master Plan, and update
signage to reinforce connection.o oo o
Fenwick Community Pork
West Fenwick Pork ond Loke Fenwick Pork
Explore combining the contiguous Fenwick Properties into one
combined management area known as Fenwick Community Park.
RE\1H
: 1/4 mile
'i i
!
'.!
@@@@@e6@+,
E. Fvergreerr Middle Seherol
Portnership
Explore opportunities for partnership with the
FederalWay School District to utilize newly
constructed fields at Evergreen Middle School for
general park use during non-school hours.aoto
F. Glenn Nelson Psrk
Renovate the playground to add
nature play elements; improve the park
connections to the neighborhood. Explore
diversifying athletic programming.ool
G. West Fenwick Pcrrk
Renovate the existing tennis courts,
including adding pickleball striping, and
renovate the trails on the west and north
edges of the park.oo a
1-1. West Hill l-ernd Aequisition
Land acquisition on theWest Hill for replacement
ofthe Kronisch property sale.oa
l. Leil<e Fenwick Pork
lmprove the park to a Tier 6 Park. lmprove
access, parking, gathering, seating, play,
and water access opportunities.
\ Connect to Green River Trail via a trail
under SR 5 1 6 and through King County
Mullen Slough Natural Area.
\ Update the disc golf course.o ooo
Loke Fenwick Pork
ffi('n-],
J. West Hill Neighborhood Pork -id $5$
Create a newTier4 neighborhood park. Consider
installing a splash pad here or elsewhere in the
park system.aoo a
K. Midwoy Neighborhood Pork lone $$$
Acquire land to fulfill need for park recreation,
and trail connection opportunities along the west
edge ofWest Hill, providing access to park in an
underserved area that will likely continue growing
as Link Light Rail Stations are completed.ooo o o
[. Volley Floor Community Pork lons $$$
Develop a community park, including large-
scale community garden space, parking,
restroom, and play area. Explore additional
amenities that would be appropriate for a
site constricted by wetlands and floodplains.
Celebrate connections to the KVLT.a ao o
L. West Hill Sports Focilily t"ns $5$
Developmenl
Develop a new sports facility as land
opportunities arise. Facility will likely focus on
rectangulal fields and overlays, with emphasis
on providing fields that can be used for
tournament play.oo Midwoy Neighb orhood Pork
o
N
1 mile
Green River Sl1ofegic Proiects
This region is characterized by industry,
megablocks, few residences, and the Green
River, which is one of Kent's most significant
recreational amenities.The Green RiverTrail,
Frager Road, and the parks along them serve
the 70,000 people who work in the valley, the
entire population of Kent, and all of South
King County. Over the past decades, the city
has acquired a significant amount of property
along the Green River to realize the vision of
riverside trails. open space, and recreational
opportunities on both sides of the river.
Reinvesting in these park and trails will ensure
that the Green River corridor continues to be a
regional draw and recreational treasure.
Proiect Outcome Key
Access
Equify
Strotegic Amenities
Progromming
Arhletics
Troils
Noturol Resources
Operotions & Moinlenonce
Portnerships
I cott"n.
I Higr's.hoot
J uiadt" s.t ool
I Elementaryschool
I KentParks
:
Green River Mop i mile
N
!
i
I
--llc
,,:
4
I
..'l
T
-\:
,t
l_
l
l-
_,I
l
t,
I
I
@@@@@46@#
A. Boeing Rock
Develop amenities and enhance recreational
opportunities in this area along the Kent Valley
Loop Trail system.O O aO +P-i
B. Von Doren's Londing Pork ii l
Construction of park relocation is scheduled
to be completed in 2022, including flood
protection, habitat improvements, and
Recreation Value enhancements.O aOO n'i
C. Briscoe Pork , ,,l r'''
Activate the park along the Kent Valley Loop Trail
system with additional recreational amenities.oo
D. Three Friends Fishing Hole ' ' :
Broaden the recreational opportunities at
this park along the Kent Valley Loop Trail.
O O dt:*
E, Green River Noturol
Resource Areo
Partner with Public Works to enhance the
Recreational Value and access to this natural
resource.O O OO #*
Kenf Volley loop froi/ signoge
/hree lriends lrshlng Hoie
:;'!r t. .:t-11 -;.::,.', ..:rjl
Eost Hill South Strotegic Proiects
The East Hill South region includes the Lake
Meridian annexation area. This region is
largely residential with both single-family
and multifamily homes, and small pockets
of retail.The key parks in this region include
Lake Meridian Parlc Monill Meadows Park,
Wilson Playfields, Service Club Ballfields,
Clark Lake, and Arbor Heights 360. East Hill
South has a good distribution of parkland but
requires further reinvestment to reach the full
potential of this recreational offering.
Proiect Outcome Key
Access
Equity
Strolegic Amenities
Progromming
Aihletics
Troils
Noturol Resources
Operolions & Moinlenonce
Porinersh ips
ij
l
.;"1:
J Highs.hoot
I miadtus.t'ool
I Elementaryschool
I KentParks
Eost Hill South Mop 1 mile
N
li, r'l-r i'l .
-,+,):,
\
(e)X
.. sEq.q
.-l iJr_!
A, Compus Pork ;11'a;:;i.i
Design work is scheduled to begin in2022,
emphasizing the following elements:
\ Play area to serve multifamily residential
surrounding the park.
\ Explore feasibility of developing a short
1 8-hole disc golf course.
\ Explore partnership with Kent School District
on the development of a joint-use facility.
\ Connect to 1 00th Ave for bikes/pedestrians.ooo ooor
B. Morrill Meodows Pork ,'r,i.,' r!-:
Construct phase 2 of park improvements,
including expansion of playground, stage for
summer concerts, and nature play area.aa o t
C. Springwood Pqrk
Continue design and construction to
transform this neighborhood park from a
Tier 3 to a Tier 4, including an expanded
children's play area, community gathering
space. and trail connectivity.ooa o o
D. Loke Meridion Pork ond ,"'.i i ;
Soos Creek Trqil Conneciion
Continue coordination with Public Works on
enhanced bike/pedestrian connection.oot
-?lr -+*
Springwood Pork, pholo credif Poul Johnslon
E.Sun Meerdows Fork
Expand the recreational value by adding loop
trail, additional sport courts, and enhanced lawn
space.
F. Clork Loke Pork i ; '
Enhance trail system, update master plan, and
develop amenities including restroom, park
shelter, nature play, and expanded parking.
Acquire land as available to complete park
assemblage. Explore addition of indoor
programmable space and unique system
amenities.oooo aoo,.
G. Eost Hill Southwest Pork
Development
Explore providing access to a diversity of
amenity in this area. This might include a
combination of acquisition and developing
existing properties, such as 272nd Park and
Seven Oaks Park, to their maximum potentials.ooo o
@@@@@&6@q.";'
@
o
C/ork loke Pork
I
ip
t4
rry
;I .i
#l*.. l
'
#
-l
1 mile
Eost Hi// Southwesl Pork Developmenl
N
I85
H. l32nd Ave pork to,r,t 95.i,
Develop into a Tier 4 Neighborhood Park.oao
l.272ndpork tcrc; .{iji"l
Develop a newTier 3 neighborhood park.aoo
J. Eostridge Pork l,:irg li-;i
Renovate and expand children's play area and
add additional features to improve Recreational
Value.
o
K. Service Club Bollfield5 l,rn.1 1!9;l
ln the near term, add automated lighted controls,
explore potential scheduling partnerships
with the Auburn School District, and reach out
to organizations that currently schedule the
fields for input. ln the long term. assess if trends
indicate need to convert to other use types.o
L. Wilson Ployfields l,:,,,.1 lii ''
Acquire adjacent property as available and
expand field space. Transition to LED lighting
and implement automated lighting controls.
Expand recreational opportunities with
additional amenities.oo
Service Club 8o//fie/ds
Wil so n Ployfiel d s Ploygroun d
Eost Hill North Strofegic Prolects
East Hill North largely includes the Panther
Lake Annexation Area and is the city's most
underserved park region under both the
traditional Level ofService (LOS) and the new
performance-based LOS. There are fewer
existing park in this region than in the rest
of Kent, and because of this, it is necessary to
add Recreational Value in this region both by
redeveloping existing parks and building new
ones. To fully meet the need of this growing
area ofthe city, new parkland shall consist of
at least one top-tier park and several smaller
neighborhood parks.
Proiecf Outcome Key
LEGEND
I cott"s"
I uigns.noot
I uiaat"s.tool
l Elementaryschool
I KentParks
Access
Equity
Strotegic Amenilies
Progromming
Athlelics
Troils
Noturol Resources
Operolions & Moinlenonce
Portnerships Eost Hill North Mop 1 mile
N
A. Chestnut Ridge Pork n*,rr $5
Renovate and expand children's play area and add
additional features to improve Recreational Value.ao
B. Gorrison Creek Pork nu.,t 5$
Continue renovation and replacement of
closed amenities. Priorities include:
\ Replace the playground in2O22.
\ Expand the use/play opportunities to
include amenities like soccer, pickleball, etc.
\ lmprove the trail connection down to
Garrison Creek to create a nature-play
experience.
\ Consider restoring lighting.ooo oo
Gorrison Creek Pork
C. Eost Hill North Community n.,.', $$$
Pork oko Huse Properly
\ Develop Huse Park into a Tier 6
community park. lnclude a trailhead for
Soos CreekTrail and improve connection
to Lake Meridian Park and Lake Youngs
Loop Trail.
\ Scope of workto include parking, restroom,
children's play area, loop nature trail, and
adaptive reuse of existi ng structure.
\ Formalize north side access point along
21 6th.
\ Explore possibility of easement with
current property owners to provide
formal trail access off 224th separate from
equestrian trail.
\ Explore possibility of partnership with
utility corridor for trail easement.ooo oo a
D. North Meridion Pork neo'$$5
\ lmprove the park from Tier 2 to Tier 5.
\ Add pedestrian access point to east side of
North Meridian Park off 125th Ave SE street
end; develop trail network.
\ Explore creating space for informal cricket
pitch; develop further if well received,
\ Explore potential partnership with lool disc golf
advocates to activateforested area ofparkThis may
require a partnering agreement with King County
as they own some ofthe adjacent property.
\ Explore partnership with the Kent School District.oao o o o
E. Pork Orchord Pork mid $
lmprove the park from Tier 1 to Tier 4. Explore
partnerships with Kent School District.oao oooo
F. Turnkey Pork mid $$
Renovate and expand children's play area and add
additional features to improve recreational value.oo
G. Eost Hill North Neighborhood mid $$$
Pork okq Motinlussi Property
Develop the Matinjussi property into a Tier
3 or 4 neighborhood park that includes
public access to Panther Lake. Explore
west access to SE 203 Pl, south access to
SE 204th 5t, and north access to private
playground. Consider restoring lighting.ooa o
H. Eosr Hill Norrh pork t",s $$$
Development
Continue exploring access to parkland
in this area, particularly in the areas
surrounding the ravines that cut
diagonally across the region. This might
include a combination of acquisition
and securing partnerships with schools
for after-use hours oftheir sporting and
playground facilities.oo
Eosl Hirl North Pork Development o
N
'I mlle
L
il
ti
,l
.t\
t
Slrofeg ic Ploiecf s Summofy_
Strategic projects are sorted into three priority buckets: near term, mid term, and long term. As discussed earlier in this chapter,
projects are scored for priority based on potential of the project to enhance the system and ease of implementation' These priority
buckets establish a guide for implementation and are not intended to be a rigid schedule or order for projects to be completed.
Near-term projects are currently underway or targets for the next capital
improvement cycle. Mid-term and long-term projects may become more -ce
feasible as appropriate funding becomes available and partnerships progress, *."
or they have aspects that can be accomplished in the near term. Level of -, " i.s* .*{
complexityandeffortassociatedwithaparticularscopeofworkistiedto ,c$* ^ J'*S
^"f"
;:,ff,."::'ndcatedroreachprojectas"'"t"t'"'u'";i'.$$i*""5';';::"1;:r
'.:,':: .,..)'.:|,|i @@@@@46@#*
4th ond Willis Greenwoy
Commons Neighborhood Pork
Kherson Pork
Eorthworks ond Mill Creek Conyon
F;;r"i p;ik
Russell Woods Pork
Old Fishing Hole
Uplonds Ployfield ond Uplonds Extension Renovotion
Downtown Pork lmprovements
Riverview Pork
9igrelYl: l:itle
Scenic Hill Pork
Downtown Centrol Pork Development
Hogon Pork ot Russell Rood
Kent Memoriol Pork
Town Squore Plozo
oo o o {isooo oooo soooo ooooooooo a ooo ao ooaoo oO OO OO #']3o- o o-o s*o ooooooo ao oreooo ooooo o
E
(,
o)
o
E
o
o
C)
E
C)
lC
')a'l
Frd+id:t{t*ii#t! -:. ;4.,':+ r{.{ai 4.Q41('BAj:trfi\#llgds*6f;3;'u.rG-'r.r!
'./c
.o
.rooo
.-""",::;$"J
"..".'':'-.'
E
o
p
E
Priority Proiect Nome
,'i..filJ rl i;lll; r:].i.11:ii,;:i;1:1ir+::.;r,?:5*:ii..,it;;l::*:::*n",,;'o't.;$i ,.
Lindo Heights Pork
Solt Air Visto Pork
C;;;;atW;;i rJnwiii.nd Lot" renwicii poltii
Connect West Fenwick Pork to the Green River Troil
Evergreen Middle School Portnership
Glenn Nelson Pork
West Fenwick Pork
West Hill Lond Acquisition
Loke Fenwick Pork
West Hil I Neighborhood Pork
N;ish6ih;d Po;kE
c,Volley Floor Community Pork
Mid;;t
oloooalao
oao
ooa
o
tt
oaoooloo oo oo
oEggE
ooo
o_
oooeoo
aa
Io
'., 'l
iIi... .. .
':. 1:
:ll
.,,..
.1 l
'r.:
]1,
i1i i.....
i.:i'
,) l::.)
ooooooaaoo
oE
_9 West Hill Sports Focility Development
'ii:lct,i;j;lit.',i,'ii1:i:i:;i: :-:i,.:i:i;'i.:,lffiitiijii::iijir"+l:',,!.j*,;":'.i'
Boeing Rock
Von Doren's Londing Pork
Briscoe Pork
Jhree Friends Hole
G;; Hili N;il;;rce Areo
ooooo
oo
o- o-oooo
ti ;,
.....i.,:i:
....,ti..
..:l:,.1,
*-".-$".."""'5".'Priority Proiect Nome *.s""c
Compus Pork
Morrill Meodows Pork
Springwood Pork
i;6 M;;idi.; P;,li;;J $;; d;;k i;.il a;nnJ.iion
oo
o
Sun Meodows Pork
Clork Loke Pork
Eost Hill Southwest Pork Development
oo
iii;e A;Po,[
272ndPork
Eostridge Pork
Service Club Bollfields
Wilson Ployfields
oaoooo
':{:11,i:iliijifili;$-ij{.,:.*ti'.*i.';dS{:Ji"$fiir,iii'i;'n',,r:rr;iii;i<';i+t
Chestnut Ridge Pork
Gorrison Creek Pork
Eost Hill North Community Pork oko Huse Property O a
North Meridion Pork
P.iii 6iih"ia p.;k
Turnkey Pork
Eost Hill No*h Neighborhood Pork oko
oo
..Melinie$i.l':qPeltv... .......ilri*ili No;ih loi't o"'"1"p'..i oo
ooarao
to
o
o
.
oooo
ooooooo
a
-o
':i 1.'
E
o
o(,
..F.
EL
0,
p
E
E
{)
o
o
ooooo ooo oo aooooo ooolaooo
oa
a
E
o
L
o(,
E
{,)
p
E
orF
oo
ooot
oo
5
:;$
$$
li;
.; {;
.:) !
.J :r
.,+ l,
:l.i'.:'l
.J'.'
1., i
.;' ,1 ,;
•� � •���. 1, ` � r
•
Wesr Fenwick Park
Y• f
chapter
How We Will
Get There 05
K E N T
Funding 95 P & 0 S
OSM Versus Capilai Funding 96 P L A N
The Problem wily Reactive Maintenance 96 2022
Funding Status 97
Our Funding Bucket 101
Curren) Funding Sources 103
Polonnal'Funding Sources 109
Partnerships with Alternate Providers -1.14
Goals and Policies 115 11
ti
............
...........
This plan creates a vibrant, constituent-led
roadmap for Kent's park and open space
system.To make this system a reality.
strategies are needed to build the proposed
strategic projects and then maintain them
at the level necessary to achieve the desired
positive outcomes for Kent.
Funding is the foundation ofthe solution; a
city's priorities are found in its budget, not
in planning documents. Kent Parks must
continue to find creative ways to partner
with other agencies to leverage funding even
further. As available land becomes scarcer. use
and maintenance partnerships with alternate
providers of assets in the city is another key.
Used strategically, funding and partnerships
can work together to provide a sustained high
quality of service to the Kent community.
When deciding how resources are allocated,
tough decisions are needed.The strategic
projects in this plan provide a roadmap for
decisions, but other projects and opportunities
arise. When this happens. goals and policies
provide guidance for decision making.
Based on the data-centric and engagement-
led conclusions, goals and policies lay out
priorities for the continuing development and
stewardship of the city's park and open space
system.The goals and policies outlined in this
report are a continuation ofthose presented in
the 2016 Plan, but they will continue to evolve
based on community engagement, analysis of
data, and the changing needs of Kent.
Funding
Kent Parks funding is divided into two
separate categories that cannot be
intermingled: capital funding for new
or replaced assets, and operations and
maintenance (O&M) funding for maintaining
and repairing assets. The 201 6 P&OS Plan
provided a vision for a vibrant urban park
system and made the case for substantial
financial commitment to support that vision.
Kent Parks was facing a significant capital
maintenance backlog without a dedicated
capital funding source. New revenue options
were needed to support the capital needs of a
system organized, renovated, and maintained
according to performance standards and
expectations.
Morrill Meodows Pork
Since the 201 6 Plan. sustainable capital
funding has been obtained, allowing Kent
Park to replace many failing assets in the
system with new assets. Parallel funding
increases for O&M have not been obtained,
setting up the system for a similar situation
as the 201 6 Plan discussed: a system again
filled with defened reactive maintenance
and failing assets instead of proactive
investment into long-term repairs to keep
the system functioning at a consistently high
level. To obtain the positive benefits that a
park system provides, it is necessary to have
Capital Funding for Repair, Replacement, and
Development, and O&M Funding that keeps
up with the increased demand of a growing
and urbanizing city.
O&M versus Copitol Funding
Kent has a Park Operations division tasked with daily operations and maintenance of all
parks, trails, open space, athletic complexes, gateways, and facility grounds. These employees
are generally responsible for routine maintenance tasks such as mowing grass, cleaning
restrooms, and emptying trash cans. They also complete minor construction projects such as
repairing plumbing and roofs and filling in potholes in parking lots and along paths. This work
is considered routine maintenance and is funded through the city's general fund.
Larger projects are contracted out to construction firms and paid for as part ofthe Parks
capital budget. These projects fall into two categories: capital repair. replacement, and
redevelopment and capital development. Projects such as constructing a new restroom
building to replace an old one, repaving a park's parking lot, or replacing an athletic field's
worn-out synthetic turf are considered capital repair and replacement projects' New
development and acquisition projects, which aim to add amenities in areas of the city that are
underserved, are considered capital development projects.
All new and existing assets need routine maintenance and eventual capital reinvestment.
Each category of park asset has a typical expected lifespan, along with its own typical
amount of routine maintenance and typical amount of capital repair. The expected lifespan
of a restroom building and the amount of maintenance required to keep it functioning
are entirely different from those of a playground, which are different from those of a grass
athletic field. What they all have in common are finite life expectancies, req uiring continual
investment throughout the course of their lifespans. Not surprisingly, routine maintenance
and capital repair costs increase as assets age, with older assets requiring more frequent and
more extensive maintenance and repair than their newer counterparts. For example, at Kent
Memorial Park, the restroom building is in near-constant need of repair, be it from a new leak
in the aged roof or problems with the failing plumbing system'
The Problem with Reoctive Mointenonce
A high level of routine O&M ensures assets do
not degrade before the end oftheir expected
lifespan. Forexample, if a naturalturf field
is overprogrammed or undermaintained it
can take years for the field to regrow to a
healthy stand ofturf.Those are years of play
lost, where that field is basically unusable.
The impact of not investing in appropriate
O&M is a vicious cycle that can reduce the
quantity and quality of recreational amenities
provided by a park system.The best-case
scenario is a funding system where O&M
funding is paired with capital funding,
ensuring that each old and new asset is
maintained consistently and at a high quality
to keep it highly functioning for a long
lifespan.
Preventolive
5i, rrri.!,,1t<j: Moinlenonce
Morole
Declines
Heod /
Budget
Reduction
is Misse d
Temporory
Repcr irs
More
Preventoble
Foilu res
Resources
Token By
Breokdowns
i tr,,it
More Repeot
Work
Funding Stotus
Copitc Repoir cnd Replocement
For this 2022 Plan, the city updated its Park
Major Asset lnventory, which inventoried and
assessed the condition ofevery existing park
asset valued at over 51 0,000. The analysis
looked at 500 assets, a more comprehensive
review than previous planning efforts, and
identified that the major assets in the system
are worth 5125 million in 2022 dollars. Based
on each asset's assessment and expected
lifetime, the average yearly capital investment
for replacing or renovating assets in the
current system is identified as 57 million in
2022 dollars.The current capital maintenance
backlog, or items that need to be replaced
in the next two years, is about $21 million or
510.5 million peryear.
The yearly capital investment average of 57
million is calculated for the next 20 years and
includes the capital maintenance backlog and
large spending years, such as when a synthetic
turf field may need replacement.This average
does not account for addition of new assets to
the park system. This average also assumes a
reasonably high level of routine O&M, some of
which is likely not happening now because of
reduced O&M budgets.
Current spending for capital reinvestment
averages around 56 million per year, 5500,000
of which comes from a fund dedicated to
major maintenance, and 55.5 million of which
is estimated based on standalone work and
addresses capital reinvestment as part ofa
more holistic project (example:West Fenwick
Park Renovation replaced several failing assets
in addition to expanded recreational value). An
additional 51 million per year is needed to keep
pace with the rate ofsystem deterioration and
accommodate for:
\ Repair/replacementbacklog
\ Saving for large expenditure replacements
such as synthetic turf resurfacing, which
is not accommodated with the current
major maintenance budget.
\ Conservative estimates of lifespan
dictated by current O&M funding. Longer
lifecycle estimates would be appropriate
if sustainable O&M funding were
available to extend longevity of assets via
preventative mai ntena nce.
Copirol Reinveslmenl Spending
to moinloin whot is olreody owned
Many ofthe projects in the Strategic Project
list are capital repair and teplacement projects,
revamping existing amenities. Recently
obtained park impact fees do not help with
capital repair and replacement as that funding
source is dedicated to new or expanded park
amenities. Recent capital gains through B&O
tax revenue has provided additional funding
for capital needs but is still not enough to
cover the existing repair and replacement
costs, much less costs of new capital
development.
City of Keni
Current spending Spending needed
os identified by
Asset lnventory
56,000,000 / yr 56,s00,000 to
57,00O000 / yr
Copitol Developmenl o&M
Community engagement has stated loud and clear that maintenance is a top priority for the
future of Kent's parks. Engagement indicated general satisfaction with the current level of
maintenance but emphasized the need for continued focus in the next five years. This is an
important statistic to recall as the city grapples with future budget cycles and the potential
for further budget reductions. As funding for O&M declines, recreational value and the level of
satisfaction will drop proportionally.
Community engagement has also shown an increase in people who dont feel as safe using the
park system. As parks are increasingly pressured by widespread societal issues, it is placing more
burden on O&M staff. On top of this, the responsibility for enforcing park rules through city code
falls to the police department, which is also stretched thin by budget and societal issues. When
prioritizing police response, park rules enforcement is often a lower priority. However. much like
other code enforcement responsibilities in the city being a lower priority, this does not mean
that enforcing the park code isn't vital to ensuring that the investment in park assets and annual
operating expense achieves the positive benefits of parks and recreation for the community.
Other cities of Kent's size have turned to park rangers to enforce park rules, which removes some
pressure from the police department to help regulate park use, something that Kent should
consider.
The Strategic Project list in this 2022 Plan also
includes targeted projects that add amenities
and acquiring properties not currently in
the system. Some of these projects take
undeveloped parcels and create brand new
Community or Neighborhood Parks in areas
that are underserved.
These project costs are additional to capital
repair and replacement costs and will increase
the capital repair/replacement and O&M
funding needed to keep the system operating
at a high level.
The new development costs outlined in this
plan are 560 million over 20 years, or around
$3 million per year.
Loke Meridion
The 2016 P&OS Plan created an opportunity to align maintenance practices with the adopted
performance-based Level of Service.Typically maintenance levels of service are driven by
a traditional park classification system. but in Kent this failed to account for the significant
variance of RecreationalValue between parks within the Community or Neighborhood Park
classifications. Since RecreationalValue drives park use RV is a useful determinant of LOS
standards and helps to inform where to expend maintenance resources.
Mointenonce LOS Tiers
Seven Maintenance LOS Tiers were created based on park Recreational Value and park type'
Each Maintenance LOS Tier is associated with maintenance standards at peak and non-peak
times of year; this accommodates for higher maintenance needed at popular (high RV) parks
and the inherent maintenance of more complicated sites.
The majority of the operations budget is spent on Maintenance LOSTiers A, B. C and Athletic
Complexes. Maintenance of Athletic Complexes is discussed !n chapter 3, and associated costs
moving forward will be largely contingent on feasibility of partnerships with the school district.
Loke Meridian
Moinlenonce level of Service liers:
LOS A: Tier 5 Parks, Urban Park, and
lndoor Facilities
LOS B: Tier 3 and 4 Park, Athletic
Complexes, and Citywide GatewaYs
LOS C: Tier 2 Parks and Minor Gateways
LOS E: Open Space and Undeveloped
Park Properties
Troils: Regional Trails and Nature Trails
LOS D: Tier 1 Parks
Moinlenonce Seosons:
Peok Seoson: April-september
\ Resources are mainlyfocused on
routine services
\ High dependency on availability of
seasonal labor
\ Focus is keeping up with public
demand for use of park system
Non- Peok Seoson: october-March
\ Less demand from public use and
seasonal vegetation growth
\ Resources are focused on preventative
maintenance, larger projects,
inventory, inspections, and audits
Average costs and O&M hours spent at Maintenance LOSTier A, B, and C parks during 201 9
created a baseline of costs and hours spent at each park in a tier (the year 201 9 was used to
represent pre-covid "normal" use). As seen in the chart below, from these baseline metrics an
approximate O&M hours and cost per year is calculated for the strategic projects proposed in
this 2022 Plan.
Assuming the projects in this plan are anticipated to be completed over 20 to 30 years, the O&M
hours are approximately equivalent to a little more than one new staff member everytwo years.
This new staff member would account for increased demand for O&M due to increased use of
the park system as Kent's population grows. the Recreational Value of the system grows to meet
the new demand, and preventative maintenance ofassets to extend life ofcapital investments.
This does not take into account program areas like urban forestry and natural areas that
are underfunded already and not directly linked to the need to maintain the developed
park system. Nor does it take into account the need for a park ranger program to increase
perceptions of safety in our park system and enforce park code.
lf the strategic projects are implemented but these associated additional o&M funds and
hours are not obtained, operations staff will be forced to take a more reactive approach to
maintenance, which will likely lead to an active maintenance backlog with assets stretched
beyond their lifespan. Potential solutions to these problems will need to come from available
funding options.
* Based on 201 9 data
** Does not include proposed land acquisitions
Gorrison Creek
Mointenonce
LOS
Averoge
o&M
cosl/ yeor
per pork*
Averoge
o&M
hours/ yeor
per pork*
2019 Pork System 2O22 Strotegic Proiects
including development of
undeveloped porcels* *
O&M increose/
yeor ior 2O22
Strotegic Proiects * *
Number
of Porks
Cost Hours Number
of Porks
Cost Hours Cost Hours
A 5182,s96 1640 6 51,O9s,576 9,838 23 54,199,707 37,712 53,104132 27,874
B 570,8s0 776 21 51 ,487,8s1 16304 26 51,842,101 20,1 85 5354,2s0 3,882
c 526,s17 238 24 s636,398 5,720 10 526s,166 2,383 -5371,232 3,337
53.087,1 s0 28,419
Our Funding Bucket
Not all funding options are equal. Many
municipal revenues come with restrictions
that do not allow their use for capital or
operating programs. Other potential revenue
categories such as private grants and
donations tend to be smaller in scale and
provide one-off opportunities that do not
supply reliable funding for ongoing concerns
like public capital programs or consistent
maintenance.
Another consideration in seeking funding is
the comparison of the level of effort involved
in obtaining the resource with the size of the
resource obtained. For example, it generally
requires more staff time to plan, organize,
and hold a volunteer event to install a small
playground than it does to apply for and
administer a half-million-dollar state grant.
Staffrng levels are a necessary consideration
when weighing resource options.
This chapter will organize revenue options
according to size, reliability, and efficiency of
effort to obtain. lt will rely on the metaphor of
two buckets holding three types of materials:
rocks, pebbles, and sand.
The types of materials stand for the
categories of funding options to address
the prioritized need. lmagine you can fill
your bucket one piece at a time with rocks,
pebbles, and/or sand. You can mostly fill the
bucket quickly with a few rocks. However.
rocks alone leave many voids, and your goal
is to fillthe bucket as completely as you can.
Those voids are best filled with a combination
of pebbles and sand.
You can also try to fill your buckets using only
pebbles, but this will take a greater effort, as
you have to gather a great number of pebbles
to fill the bucket. Trying to fill the bucket with
only sand, one grain at a time, amounts to a
monumental challenge.
Rocks are generally the largest and most
reliable funding sources. Without rocks, a
capital plan becomes more of an exercise in
wishful thinking. There are a few large sources
of municipal revenue that are allowed to be
used on parks capital projects.
Pebbles can range from moderate gifts (most
often from service clubs or corporations)
to sizable state grants. Pebbles can help fill
in large gaps, so it is smart to pursue them
aggressively. However, pebbles are also
unpredictable and sporadically available,
which makes it imprudent to rely on them
as a primary source for filling the funding
bucket.
Sand is primarily useful for filling in
remaining gaps not addressed by rocks and
pebbles. Since every source in this funding
bucket must be pursued, managed, and
administered individually, trying to fill an
entire bucket ofany substantive size one
grain at a time would be futile. Sand, such as
volunteering, can still play a valuable role in
building community support and ownership
of the system.
LJ
on empty
Funding
Buckel
w
+ ROCKS
l"n;::l"o'"
\--/ LJ Wr
+PEBBLES +SAND = oFl:ed
less sustoining ,"t'" ,, [::iff
Our system has two buckets. One bucket represents capital funding and the other represents
operations and maintenancefunding.The buckets are the size of the resource commitment,
and the size of the buckets is the first decision the community must make. lf the parks capital
need or maintenance need is not addressed in its entirety, strategic decisions will be needed
to address how assets and, potentially, entire parks are allowed to fail. The community has
indicated that high levels of maintenance are top priority, which supports increased funding
in this area. The community has also provided guidance on priority assets in the system; if
capital need is not fully addressed, medium- and low-priority existing assets, which represent
significant historic investment, may need to be closed.
- r Preveniolive mointenonce exlends ossel lile
. Porks ore sofe, cleon ond inviting
. Porks ore used by more residents ond workers
. lncreose in othlelic field use ond revenue
. Assels ore reploced before they foil
. Recreoiionol volue keeps up with need
. Positive use in porks drives out negolive use
For a long-lived highly functioning system
that provides recreation for a growing
population, the capital funding bucket and
O&M funding bucket need to be balanced
and grow in tandem with population. lf capital
investment matches population growth but
O&M investment does no! RV will increase in
the short term but eventually assets will fall
into disrepair and RV will plummet. lf O&M
investment matches population growth but
capital investment does not, RV will follow
the capital investment trend and not meet
recreational need for the growing population.
. Asseis foil
. Recreotionol volue drops
. Negotive use outweighs
posiiive use
time
Copilol Reinveslmenl
thol foils lo meel need ond demond
r Preventolive mointenonce doesn'l hoppen
. Restrooms close, gorboge ond groffiti occumulole
. Porks ore less sofe, cleon ond inviiing
. Athlelic field condifions drive owoy use
ond revenue
time lime
Copirol Reinveslment ond Operoling Budget Operoting Budget
lhol meets need ond demond thqt foils lo meel need and demond
Current Funding Sources
The City has primarily funded its parks and
recreation services through the General
Fund and capital needs from grants, real
estate excise tax (REET) and starting in
2019 Business &OccupationTax (B&O). For
the next biennial budget and beyond, the
City expects spending in the general fund
to outpace collected revenues which will
increase competition for resources and likely
reduce the amount of funding available for
parks capital along with maintenance and
operations. The City has already addressed
the City's fiscal cliff and the first rounds of
COVID-I9 impacts in the 2019/2020 budget
and the City is moving into the next biennial
budget planning cycle uncertain ofthe
impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on its
permanent fi scal outlook.
To continue investment in parks, the City
will need to identifl/ and pursue additional
revenue enhancements. The following
list of rocks, pebbles, and sand is not an
exhaustive list but notes the primary types
of opportunities for filling Kent's O&M and
capital funding buckets.
O&M Funding Bucket
ln Kent and the surrounding cities, one-time capital funding is outstripping ongoing O&M
funding and creating an imbalance in the system. Additional o&M funding is needed to keep
pace with the size and quality of park system that is needed to serve Kent.
ROCK: Generol Fund
operations & Maintenance (o&M) is funded primarily by the city's General Fund which is
the principal operating fund ofthe city. The primary expenditures in the General Fund are
for general City administration, public safety, economic development, planning services,
operations and maintenance, cultural programs, and recreation services. ln 2022, the adopted
budget for the General Fund was S 1 1 1,1 72,050; of which Operations and Maintenance
accounted for less than 7%.
The City's General Fund is tax and general revenue supported which includes but is not
limited to property tax, sales tax, utility & other taxes, licenses and permits. state shared
revenues, and charges for services.
Ever since the Great Recession (2007-2009), the City has continued to face budgetary
challenges within the City's General Fund because expenditures continue to outpace revenues
due to inflation, medical increases, legal mandates, increase demand in use of City services,
and Streamline SalesTax implementation. Propertytaxes are one of the major revenue
sources in the general fund and accounts for 28olo ofthe general fund funding source but only
growsatarateof 1oloplusnewconstructionperyear. lnflationhasgrown360/osince2OO7.
Generol Fund Chollenges:
Washington State Constitution limits the annual rate of property taxes that may be
imposed on an individual parcel of property to 1olo of its true and fair value. Property
tax funding makes up 28olo ofthe General Fund. A 1olo annual increase does not cover
inflation (CPl) increases that have ranged fromO.29o/oto 4.28olo between 2OO7-2O21.
lnflation has and will continue to outpace property taxes.
Due to revenue limitation of growth in the general fund, the City has faced two major
budgetary reductions in the last biennial budget:
City Fiscol Cliff : The loss of state-shared Streamlined Sales Tax mitigation revenues beginning
in 2019, coupled with the expiration of the Panther Lake Annexation Sales tax credit in June
2020, resulted in a negative impact of over 510,000,000 or roughly 10olo of the City's General
Fund revenues. As part of the 2019/2020 adopted budget, the City reduced over 52,000,000
in ongoing expenditure by non-public safety General Fund departments. ln addition,
5470,000 in sales tax collections from shifted from capitalto fund ongoing operations in the
General Fund. The remainder of the gap was filled by over 5 1,000,000 annual increase in
permit and plans review revenues, increase in interest revenue as a result of new investment
strategy, new revenue from water and sewer franchise fees, and beginning in 2020 the budget
included an increase in City B&O tax rates which filled an additional 53,400,000 of this gap.
COVTD-lgReductlon;The COVID-19 pandemic has been an unprecedented disruption to
Washington's economy. Governor lnslee on March 23, 2020 issued a "Stay Home, Stay
Healthy" order to help slow the spread of COVID-1 9 which allowed only essential businesses
to remain open to the public and restaurants were only allowed to offer take-out. ln 2020,
prior to the 2O19/2020 Mid-Biennium Budget Adjustment, the City proactively started to
determine what the impacts of the pandemic were to the General Fund. The estimated
shortfall ofthe General Fund was an estimated S14,200,000. To address this shortfall the City
reduced 53,200,000 in capital transfers (eliminated or reduced capital projects funded by the
General Fund), 55,000,000 ongoing department reductions,51,500,000 one-time department
reductions. transfer of 5 1,OOO,O00 fund balance from the City's Wellness Fund and the use of
55,000,000 General Fund fund balance.
The City s General Fund will continue to have challenges as expenditures continue to outpace
revenueS.
Copitol Funding Buckei
The 2016 Plan made the case for consistent rock-based capital funding sources. Partially due to the argument made in that plan, the new rock
of B&O Tax has been implemented, which has hugely helped capital funding for the system, and the recent implementation of Park lmpact
Fees is contributing towa rd a more sustainable capita I budget for development projects. This plan builds on the work of the 201 6 Pla n and
continues the search for consistent funding sources to ensure an equitable park system today and in the future.
ROCK: Reol Eslofe Excise Tax (REET2), $0 - $4,500,000 per yeor
Any city or town that is fully planning under the Growth Management
Act (GMA) may impose an additional 0.25olo excise tax (REET 2 or second
quarter percent) authorized under RCW 82.46.035 upon all real estate
sale, in addition to the tax imposed under REET1. REET2 revenues are
restricted and may only be used for financing "capital projects" specified
in the capital facilities plan element of the city's comprehensive land use
plan. RCW 82.46.03(5) defines "capital project"as:
\ Planning, acquisition, construction, reconstruction, repair,
replacement, rehabilitation, or improvement of streets, roads,
highways, sidewalks, street and road lighting systems, traffic signals,
bridges, domestic water systems, storm and sanitary sewer systems.
\ Planning, construction, reconstruction, repair, rehabilitation, or
improvements of parks; and
\ Until January 1, 2026, planning, acquisition, construction,
reconstruction, repair, replacement, rehabilitation, or improvements
of facilities of those experience homelessness and affordable housing
projects.
The City has further restricted the use of REET2 for park related capital
improvements.
REET Chollenges:
Because REET is based on the total value of real estate
transactions each year, the amount of REET revenues
the City receives can vary substantially from year-to-year
based on the normal ebb and flow of the real estate
market. During the Great Recession (December 2017 -
June 201 9), REET2 revenues available to fund parks capital/
lifecycle dipped below 50.
REET2 Funding Avoiloble for Copitol / Lilecycle
5 m,ico
4.5{{ ffil
4 &rc.il0
3,5C0SC
3.tri}m
2.5CC. mO
z,C{O,CCO
t.500mo
r.000.{cs
5& OO
:fr7 :m8 20lt 2Ol3 2Ci I ;-01:2013:Ol4 2Ol5 ?OlC 2Cl7 20lE 2Ol9 lo?C 2021
t
ROCK: Business & Occupoiion Tox (B&O), $0 to $3,000,000 per yeor
ln 2013, the City of Kent implemented a business & occupation tax (B&O tax) which is
comprised of two components: gross receipts tax and square foot tax. Taxpayers with a
business location located within the City limits must report both components, while taxpayers
with a business location located entirely outside City limits is required to only report gross
receiptstax. Fortaxpayersreportingbothgrossreceiptstaxandsquarefoottax,thetaxdueis
based on the greater amount ofthe two.
Square foot tax was implemented in 2019 which applies to taxpayers that lease, own, occupy
or otherwise maintain business warehouse space, outdoor warehouse space, or other
business floor space in excess of the threshold amounts within the City.
Square footage revenues equivalent to 0.03 quarterly on business warehouse floor space and
0.01 quarterly on other business floor space are allocated to the city's capital resource fund.
The City allocated a portion ofthe square foot tax revenues to Park's capital starting in 201 9.
lnlerurbon
2021 Kenl Cornucopio Doys 5k
B&O Chollenges:
The City has seen a decrease in overall payment of square foot tax due to businesses
reporting higher gross revenues. The original estimates of S3.0M/year has decreased to
$2.5M/year in available capital funding.
Additionally, B&O tax allocated to the City's Capital Resources Fund are reviewed each
year by Council during the City's adopted budget process to determine how much
funding will be allocated to city projects. This is a competitive process and Park's capital
may or may not receive business and occupation tax per Council's directions.
ROCK: King County Porks Levy, $0 - $400,000 per yeor
ln 2007, King County voters approved two property tax levy lid lifts to support park
operations and open space and trails from 2008-2013. This levy was renewed in 2013 for
2014-2019 and then again in 2019 fot 2020-2025. lt's important to note that the city of Kent
does not have any King county Parks within it's geographic boundary, except a portion ofthe
lnterurban Trail.
On August 6. 201 9, King County voters approved a measure to renew the property tax levy
supporting parks, trails, and open space in King county. The measure replaced the levy that
expired at the end of 201 9 and will generate an estimated $810 million over six years, costing
approximately 57.60 per month for the owner of a home with an assessed property value of
S5OO,OOO. King County will be going out for a renewal levy in 2025, which could impact any
voter initiatives the City of Kent may pursue.
The revenue generated by this levy is invested county-wide in parks. trails, recreation, and
open space protection for the benefit ofall King County residents. King County allocates a
portion of their levyfunds to cities.
King County Ordinance 18890, establishes a new formula for distributing each city's levy
allocation:
\ 525,000 shall be distributed annual to each town and city;
\ an additional 575,000 shall be distributed annually to cities with a population greater than
four thousand; and
\ of the remainder, 50% shall be distributed in proportion to each town or city's population
and 500/o shall be distributed in proportion to the assessed value of parcels within each
town or city.
ROCK/PEBBLE?: Pork lmpocl Fees, $ vories
The City implemented park impact fees in 2021. This is a one-time fee paid at the time of new development
by the developers and it represents a share of the facilities needed for g rowth. The City's consultant
estimated that the fee can raise up to S 1 2.1 OO,0OO over the next six years for the city to help pay toward
a city parks project list that will cost 543,000,000. Due to COVID 19 pandemic. there was a lag in issuing
permits. Although this fee was implemented in 2021, the city has not yet seen a significant amount of park
impact fee revenue due to grandfathered permits that were applied prior to the implementation. Parks did
not start receiving park impact fees until early 2022. Through May 2022, Parks has received 5124,500.
ln 2021, King County Parks./Open Space
Levy generated 54.5M from the City of
Kent. The City received $377K.
King County transitioned Lake Meridian,
Springwood, Pine Tree, Turnkey. Meridian
Glen, Sun Meadows, Eastridge North
Meridian, Park Orchard and Green Tree
Parks to the City between 1993-2410.
The City did not receive levy funding
until 201 7.
King County Porks Levy
Chollenges:
King County Parks Levy must be
renewed every six years; if this levy is
not renewed then these revenues will
no longer be available.
107
PEBBLE: Motor Vehicle FuelTox (MVFT), $9,000 - $\O,OOO per Yeor
The city is required by RCW 47.30.050 to spend a minimum of o.42o/o ol MVFT receipts on
paths and trails (unless that amount is 5500 or less).
PE BBLE: Locol/ Stote,/ Fe de rol G ronls, $ vories
State and federal grant programs provide one-time capital funding. The City has utilized
these grant opportunities for capital reinvestments along with property acquisitions. The
City has a history of successfully pursuing grants from the Washington State Recreation
and Conservation Office along with King County Conservations Futures grants (funded by
Conservation Futures Tax).
SAND: Sponsorshrps/Noming Rrghis, $ vories
The City can seek additional revenues by pursuing corporate partnerships, naming rights, and
advertisement opportunities at City of Kent parks and facilities; however that would require
adding new staffto be able to pursue this funding source.
SAND: Other Funding Sourceq $ vories
The department has looked at creative techniques to infuse additional capital dollars into the
system by way of the Pa rks Fou ndation (501 C3), use of volunteers, implementation of fee-in-
lieu of, and various other avenues.
Chollenges wilh Gronls:
Grants typically include restrictions on future use of the properties acquired or improved.
Grants for maintenance support are relatively few, as compared to capital grants. They
are typically awarded on a year-to-year basis, making it unsustainable to rely on their
availability over time.
Chollenges with Noming Righrs:
The public could react negatively to the concept of advertising in, and naming rights
to, community facilities such as public parks. ln addition, corporate partnerships could
cause potential conflicts with sponsorships of prospective special events, which is why a
strategic and intentional approach to this type of funding must occur.
Potenliol Funding Sources
ROCK: Voter-Approved levies
Voter-approved levies can be for short-term (6 years) or long-term (up to 1 2 years). Both levies
would count towards the City3 property tax levy cap. For short-term levies, revenue is not
Iimited to 1olo annual growth rate and can keep up with inflation, but long-term levies can only
grow by 1olo annual which may be less than the rate of inflation. Funds can be used for operating
and/or capital and can be bonded (borrowed) against as long as the levy is 9 years or less.
ROCK: Merropoliton Pork District (MPD)
Metropolitan park districts (MPD) is authorized by RCW 35.61. MPDs are quasi-municipal
corporations and independent taxing districts. This means that MPDs have separate governing
boards. however a district wholly located with the City can define the City Council to be the ex
offi cio governing board.
Metropolitan park districts generally offer more fiscal capacity and flexibility than park and
recreation districts or park and recreation service areas. ln particular, metropolitan park districts
only require approval by a simple majority of voters (5oo/o + 1o/o), afler which MPD's legislative
body may impose permanent property taxes, whereas park and recreation districvservice areas
may only impose property tax levies for six years at a time, subject to 60%0 voter approval.
Metropolitan park districts would provide long-term stable funding that would alleviate reliance
on the general fund for parks capital and additional operations and maintenance funding to
meetindustrylevel ofservicestandards. Revenueisnotlimitedtolo/oannual growthandcan
keep pace with inflation.
State law limits Metropolitan Park District funds to parks and recreation purposes only.
Levies raise a specific amount of money
for specific identified park project and tax
is eollected for a specific amount of time.
Levy Chollenges:
lf the levies expire, the program it funded will no longer have a revenue source and must
be cut or funded in another way. This makes term-limited levies an uncertain source for
ongoing maintenance, operations, and programing, which need stable, secure funding.
lf levies were used to fund one-time capital improvements or expansion, ongoing
maintenance/operations will need to be funded within the City's existing funding or the
level of service for all other parks will need to be reduced to accommodate.
As of 2021, there are 23 metropolitan patk
districts within the State of Washington.
The oldest being, Metro ParkTacorna
('1 907) and the new€st being Stevenson
Community Pool District (2021).
109
ROCK: Utility lox
Per RCW 35 - any city or town can impose
these taxes on businesses doing business
within their boundaries. The utility tax may
be levied upon Cable TV Electricity. Gas,
Sewer/Stormwater, Solid Waste, Steam,
Telephone, and Water. Utility tax may not
be levied upon broadcast satellite TV and
lnternet Services.
There are no restrictions on how cities
use utility taxes revenues. Most cities use
these revenues for general fund purposes.
However, when voter approval is asked for
rates higher than 60lo (for electric, natural gas.
telephone; there is no limit prescribed in state
or federal law for sewer, solid waste/garbage,
stormwater/drainage and/or water uti lity),
cities often dedicate the additional revenue
to specific uses.
The adjacent chart reflects City-placed
restricted use of utility tax collections.
Utility tax makes up nearly 18olo of the
General Fund revenues. ln 201 5, an
additional 10.60lo was authorized for garbage
utility tax allocated to the maintenance and
repair of residential streets.
* lnternal UtilityTax
For each 1olo increase, thir would generate S2.OMlyear'
Utility
Tvpe
City of
Kent Role
Generol
Fund
Street
Fund
Youth &
Teen Fund
lT Fund Copitol
Resources
Cable 6.Oo/o 6.Oo/o
Electric 6.Oo/o 4.7o/o 1.Oo/o O.3o/o
Garbage 18,4o/o 6.5o/o 11.60/o O.3o/o
Gas 6.0o/o 4.7o/o 1.Oo/o 0.3o/o
Telephone 6.Oo/o 4.7o/o 1 .Oo/o 0.3o/o
Water *'13.0o/o 7.7o/o 1.Oo/o O.3o/o 4.Oo/o
Sewer n 9.5o/o 5.60/o 0.7o/o O.2o/o 2.9o/o
Drainage *19.5o/o 11.60/o '1.5o/o O.4o/o 6.0o/o
Utiliry Tox Chollenges:
Comparing the City of Kent utility tax
rate to neighboring cities, the City is
already on the high end of some of the
utility tax rates.
Urility Tox Rote Comporison
'oooo',1)," fili ftli
I Kent rBellevue I Renton ,'Auburn
h
,:i
9\
.u
.o$o "".. o,*rtr
25.OOo/o
20.00o/o
1s.00%
10.000/o
af" t".t
"a."-
Hi lllr
^o("& .""",(o-
ROCK: Porks Benefits District (HB 1025/SB 5006)
The State legislator finds that Washington state will continue to see significant population
growth, with the offce of financial management (OFM) forecasts estimating nearly 2,000,000
more people by the year of 2040. ln the face of this dramatic growth, the legislator finds that
it is more important than ever to help preserve, maintain, and enhance local parks, trails, and
open spaces that are key contributors to the state's quality of life.
House Bill (HB) 1025 and Senate Bill (SB) 5006 proposes to add the following section to
Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 82.14 - Local retail sales and use taxes:
\ The legislative authority of a city or a county, the government body of a metropolitan park
district under chapter 35.61 RCW or the governing body of a park and recreation district
under chapter 36.69 RCW may submit an authorizing proposition to voters at a special
or general election, and if the proposition is approved by a majority of persons voting,
impose a sales and use tax in accordance with the terms of this chapter. The title of the
ballot measure must clearly state the purposes for which the proposed sales tax will be
used.
\ Thetaxauthorizedinthissectionisinadditiontoanyothertaxesauthorizedbylawand
must be collected from those persons who are taxable by the state under chapters 82.08
and82.'12RCWupontheoccurrenceofanytaxableeventwithinthetaxingarea. Therate
of tax equals one-tenth (0.1 %o) of one percent of the selling price in the case of a sales
tax, or the value of the article used, in the case of a use tax. The tax may be imposed only
within an existing city, county, metropolitan park district. or park and recreation district
boundary.
The moneys collected under this section must be used for the purpose ofacquiring,
constructing, improving, providing, and funding park maintenance and improvement within
the taxing area.
Ciry of Kent Scleg TEx = IO.l7o
6.507o StateofWashington
0.10olo Criminal Justice Sales Tax
O.10olo King County Mental Health
0.90olo King County MetroTransit
1.400/0 SoundTransit
0.84olo City of Kent
0.107o King Countyhousing and
related services
0,01olo State of Washington - admin fee
0.15olo King County
Porks Benefits Districl Chollenges:
The tax imposed under this proposed
section may not be imposed for a period
ofexceeding 1 0 years; this maY be
extended if the tax imposed underthis
section was imposed alter July 1,2021
and the funds are used for repayment
of indebtedness incurred in accordance
with the requirements of this section or
there is an affirmative vote of the voters
to extend the tax imposed under this
section.
PEBBLE: Tox lncrement Finoncing (TIF)
Tax increment financing (TlF) is a financing tool that local governments in Washington State -
defined as cities, towns, counties, port districts, or any combination thereof - can use to fund
public infrastructure in targeted areas to encourage private development and investment
(RCW 39.1 14).
A local government wishing to utilize TlF, will designate an "increment area"surrounding
the site of the public improvements. The property tax portion of increases in assessed
value of the properties within the increment area is allocated towards paying for the public
improvement costs.
"Locol governrnenl revenues must odequolely tund the public services
thol o communily desires wilhout creoting excess;ve inefficiencies or
unfoirness in lhe revenue roising sysfem. However, locol governmenl
revenue sfrucfures ore lorgely bosed on ossurnpfions thot no longer hold
today due to digitization, globolizalion, demogrophy, politicol chonges,
ond other frends. Fvrthermore, foirness is becoming on increosingly
imporlonl concern for public finance. Locol governmenls should roise
revenues fairly ond in o woy fhot is consistent with communily volues"
Government Finonce Officer Associotion
TIF revenues are not subje€t to the 1 01 0,6
levy lid lirnh and may increase more
than 1'7o in any given year andTlF may
stimulate redevelopment of blighted
areas years before such activity might
occur naturally if ever.
TIF Chollenges:
TIF may set different urban areas and different level of government in competition with
one another over funding. Cities can obtain revenues that would otherwise flow to
overlying government levels or school districts in addition is can be difficult to assess
precisely how much incremental gain in tax revenues relates to theTlF project.
112
Loke Meridion
Pqrtnerships with Alternqfe Providers
This plan will need support and commitment
from many entities including the community,
city staff, and public and private groups.
The projects and strategic actions ofthis
plan will require ongoing coordination and
collaboration to achieve success.
School District Portnerships
The schools within the Kent School District
(KSD) offer a wide variety of interior and
exterior athletic facilities and other amenities.
An existing interlocal agreement between
the school district and Kent Parks has been
in place for decades to share the use and
maintenance of school and park facilities to
mutual benefit. When considering access to
amenities in the park system, certain areas
in the city are lacking (see conversation on
Access and Equity Heat Mapping in chapter
3). Partnerships with KSD schools could help
fill those amenity gaps, especially on the East
Hill, and achieve strategic O&M efficiencies.
Amenities might include but are not limited
to playgrounds, gyms, and athletic facilities.
Partnerships with other school districts or
colleges including the FederalWay School
District, a portion of which is within Kent city
limits, could also fill the need for indoor and
outdoor recreational facilities.
Public Agency Portnerships
King County Parks are an important provider of amenity in the region. Maintenance and use
agreements are mutually beneficial to both entities and need to be revisited and updated in
the near term. specifically related to the Green River and lnterurban Trails. Additionally, there
are opportunities to partner with King County Parks near the city's fringe as the residents
served in this area reside both within Kent city limits and in unincorporated King County.
Additionally, Kent Parks should work toward improved collaboration and partnership with
neighboring cities (Renton, Auburn. Tukwila, Des Moines, Federal Way, and Covington) to
better plan regional trail connections and look more closely at service area gaps. Providing
high quality parks and recreation need not be limited to lines on a map, and residents will
benefit from improved coordination between municipal government.
lnterdeportmentol Porinerships
Many city departments are focused on improving the quality of life within the city, and
many departmental plans are working simultaneously toward that goal. Working in tandem,
the various city entities can provide a strength that no department can do alone, ensuring
an equitable city that provides for all its citizens. Key city partnerships for Kent Parks are
Economic and Community Development and Public Works, but all city departments are
critical to delivering high-quality services to our residents.
Olher Providers
There are a variety of private entities in the area that provide outdoor park-like space that
are not identified as potential for partnerships, but do provide important amenity. These are
organizations like farmers markets, farms, outdoor adventure providers, and homeowner
associations that provide recreational opportunities for their own residents.
Gools ond Policies
The following P&OS goals and policies
provide guidance for decision making, laying
out priorities related to the continuing
development and stewardship of the city's
park and open space system. The goals and
policies outlined in this report are those
presented in the 2016 Plan and will be
revisited and updated in the upcoming years.
Overoll Gool
Encourage and provide local public
opportunities for physical activity, connecting
to nature, community engagement, and
life-enrichment through the strategic
development and thoughtful stewardship
of parkland and recreational facilities,
professional programming, preservation of
natural areas, and the optimal utilization of
available community resources.
l. Pork ond Recreotion Focilities Gools
ond Policies
Maintain and steward a high-quality park and
recreation system designed to appeal to a
diverse range ofabilities, ages, and interests.
GOAL P&OS-I:
Promote the provision of quality recreational
opportunities throughout the city.
\ POLICY P&OS-1 .1 : Work with other
departments to encourage new single-
family and multifamily residential and
commercial developments to provide
recreation elements.
\ POLICY P&OS-1.2: When acquiring,
planning, developing, or redeveloping
park properties, recognize that the
different areas ofthe city have different
recreational needs (e.9., the parks needs
for the downtown area are different from
those on, say, East Hill) and establish a
protocol for incorporating consideration
ofthose different needs into the various
decision-making processes.
\ POLICY P&OS-1.3: Where appropriate,
initiate with other private and public
interests joint development ventures that
meet recreational needs and achieve City
of Kent strategic goals.
GOAI P&OS.2:
Develop, maintain, and operate a high-quality
system of indoor facilities designed to appeal
to a diverse range of abilities, ages, and
i nterests.
\ POLICY P&OS-2.1:Manage existing
multiple-use indoor community centers
that provide indoor recreational and
gathering opportunities for a wide range
of ages, abilities. and interests on a year-
round basis.
\ POLICY P&OS-2.2: Continue to seek
strategic partnerships with other public
and private agencies to provide indoor
recreational opportunities, particularly in
underserved areas ofthe city.
GOAT P&OS-3:
Where appropriate. possibly in conjunction
with other public and/or private
organizations, develop and operate
specialized park and recreational enterprises
that meet the interest of populations who are
able and willing to finance, maintain, andlor
operate them.
\ POLICY P&OS-3.1:Where appropriate and
economically feasible (i.e., self-supporting),
develop and operate specialized and
special interest recreational facilities like
golf, ice skating, disc golf, mountain biking,
and offJeash parks.
GOAL P&OS-4:
Further develop the performance-based
approach to stewarding park and recreation
facilities as outlined in the 2016 Parks and
Open Space Plan.
\ POLICY P&OS-4.1: Prior to acquiring
and/or developing a potential park or
recreationa I facility, ca reful ly eval uate its
potential contribution to the system, and
only proceed if the potential investment
is considered to be complementary to the
system and can contribute to the system's
overall performance.
\ POLICY P&OS-4.2: Prior to renovating
a park asset or redeveloping a Park,
carefully evaluate its current and
potential contribution to the system, and
only proceed if the potential investment
is considered to be complementary to the
system and can contribute to the system's
overall performance.
\ POLICY P&OS-4.3: Periodically evaluate
the entire system in terms of each park
and facility's performance. Consider
recommending the repurposing of
any asset or property whose current
and potential Recreational Value is not
expected to contribute to the system's
overall performance.
GOAL P&OS.S:
Despite having multiple water bodies in its
jurisdiction, the city has limited public water
access. Work with other public and private
entities to preserve and increase waterfront
access and facilities.
\ POLICY P&OS-5.1 :Work with other
public and private agencies to acquire,
develop, and preserve additional
shoreline access for waterfront fishing,
wading, swimming, scenic viewing, and
other related recreational activities and
pursuits, especially on the Green River,
Lake Fenwick, Clark Lake, Lake Meridian,
and Panther Lake.
\ POLICY P&OS-5.2: For any public or private
waterfront projects, work with the property
owner or project representative to find
ways to include public access, including
access to scenic views of the water.
ll. Open Spoce Gools ond Policies
The City of Kent contains significant public
open spaces and greenways.Through
careful and thoughtful stewardship ofthese
properties, the city can improve urban habitat
and pedestrian connectivity and increase the
public's appreciation and understanding of
the importance ofthese spaces in the urban
setti ng.
GOAL P&OS-6:
Thoughtfully and strategically acquire and
manage public open space to improve wildlife
habitat and other environmental benefits, as
well as non-motorized connectivity and other
complementa ry recreational benefi ts.
\ POLICY P&OS-6.1 : Seek to improve
greenway corridors within the Kent area.
\ POLICY P&OS-6.2: lncrease linkages
oftrails and other existing or planned
connections with greenways and open
space, particularly along the Green River,
Mill Creek, Garrison Creek, and Soos
Creek corridors; around Lake Fenwick,
Clark Lake, Lake Meridian, Panther Lake,
and LakeYoungs; and around significant
wetland and floodways such as the Green
River Natural Resource Area (GRNRA).
GOAL P&OS.Z:
Continue to develop an urban forestry
management program that balances
environmental benefits with recreation and
public safety priorities.
POLICY P&OS-7..I:Connect People to
nature and improve the quality of life
in Kent by restoring and enhancing the
urban ecosystem.
POLICY P&O5-7.2: Galvanize the
community around urban ecosystem
restoration and stewardship through a
volunteer restoration program.
\
\
116
lll. Troil ond Corridor System Gools ond
Policies
Develop a high-quality system of
multipurpose park trails and corridors that
create important linkages and/or provide
access to desirable destinations, including
signifi cant environmental features, public
facilities, developed neighborhoods,
employment centers, and commercial areas.
GOAL P&OS.8:
Continue to work with other departments
and agencies to develop and improve a
comprehensive system of multipurpose off-
road and on-road trails that link park and
recreational resources with residential areas,
public facilities, commercial, and employment
centers both within Kent and within the region.
\ POLICY P&OS-8.1 : Seek opportunities to
develop trail "missing links" along existing
routes, including the Puget Power rights-
of-way, Soos CreekTrail, Mill CreekTrail,
Lake FenwickTrail, Green River Trail,
Frager Road, and the lnterurban Trail.
\ POLICY P&OS-8.2:Work with other city
departments to create a comprehensive
system of on-road trails to improve
connectivity for the bicycle commuter,
recreational, and touring enthusiasts
using scenic, collector, and local road
rig hts-of-way and alignments. Special
emphasis should be placed on increasing
east-west connectivity.
\ POLICY P&O5-8.3: Work with neighboring
cities, King County, and other appropriate
jurisdictions to connect Kent trails to
other community and regional trail
facilities like the Green River, lnterurban,
Frager Road, and Soos CreekTrails
\ POLICY P&OS-8.4: Extend trails through
natural area corridors like the Green River,
Mill Creek, Garrison Creek, and Soos
Creek, and around natural features like
Lake Fenwick, Clark Lake, Lake Meridian
and Panther Lake in order to provide a
high-quality, diverse public access to
Kent's environmental resources.
GOAL P&OS-9:
Furnish trail corridors, trailheads, and other
supporting sites with amenities to improve
comfort, safety, and overall user experience.
\ POLICY P&OS-9.1: lmprove accessibility to
trails by siting trailheads and appropriate
improvements in high-visibility locations.
\ POLICY P&OS-9.3: Design and develop
trail improvements that are easy
to maintain and easy to access by
maintenance, security, and other
appropriate personnel, equipment, and
vehicles.
lV. Historic ond Culturol Resources
Gools ond Policies
Through sensitive design, preservation and
interpretation, the park system can help
educate the public regarding Kentt rich
cultural and historical legacy.
GOAL P&OS-r0:
Preserve, enhance, and incorporate historic
and cultural resources and multicultural
interests into the park and recreational
system.
\ POLICY P&OS-10.1: ldentifyand
incorporate signifi cant historic and
cultural resource lands, sites, artifacts,
and facilities into the park system, when
feasible.
\ POLICY P&OS-10.2:Workwith the
Kent Historical Society and other
cultural resource groups to incorporate
community activities at and
interpretation of historic homes and sites
into the park and recreation system.
V. Culturol Arts Progroms ond Resources
Gools ond Policies
Develop high-q uality, diversifi ed cultural
arts facilities and programs that increase
community awareness, attendance, and other
opportunities for participation.
117
Vl. Focility Design Gools ond Policies
Design and develop facilities that are welcoming
to Kent's diverse communit, are attractive, safe
and easy to maintain, with life-cycle features
that account for long-term costs and benefits.
\ POLICY P&OS-1 1 .1: Support successful
collaborations among the Arts Commission, GOAL P&OS- l3:
business community, service groups, Design park and recreational indoor and
cultural organizations, schools, arts patrons, outdoor facilities to be accessible to a wide
and artists to utilize artistic resources and range of physical capabilities, skill levels, age
talents to the optimum degree possible. groups, income levels, and activity interests.
\ POLICY P&OS-1 1.2: Develop strategies that
will support and assist local altists and art
organizations. Where appropriate, develop
and support policies and programs that
encourage or provide incentives to attract
and retain artists and artworkwithin the
Kent community.
GOA|_ P&OS-11 :
Work with the arts community to utilize local
resources and talents to increase public access
to artwork and programs.
GOA|. P&OS-12:
Acquire and d isplay public artwork to furnish
public facilities and other areas and thereby
increase public access and appreciation.
\ POLICY P&OS-12.1: Acquire public artwork
including paintings, sculptures, exhibits,
and other media for indoor and outdoor
display in order to expand access by
residents and to furnish public places in an
appropriate manner.
\ POLICY P&OS-12.2: Develop strategies
that will support capital and operations
funding for public artworkwithin parks and
facilities.
\ POLICY P&OS-1 3.1 : Look for opportunities
to incorporate the principles of inclusive
design in any new construction.
\ POLICY P&OS-13.2:When designing new
recreational facilities, reach out to the
public to learn their priorities, needs, and
desires for the improvements; and use
public input to inform the design.
GOAL P&OS-14:
Design and develop park and recreational
facilities to be of low-maintenance materials.
\ POLICY P&OS-I4.1 : Design and develop
facilities that are of low-maintenance and
high-quality materials to reduce overall
facility maintenance and operation
requirements and costs.
\ POLICY P&OS-i4.2: lncorporate
maintenance considerations early in
the process in all designs for parks and
recreational facilities.
GOAr P&OS-15:
Design for a safe and welcoming park
environment.
\ POLICY P&OS-I5.1 : Using the Crime
Prevention through Environmental
Design (CPTED) and other design and
development standards and practices,
seek opportunities to improve park
safety and security features for users,
department personnel, and the public at
large.
Vl. Focility Design Gools ond Policies
Adhere to cost-effective, sustainable, and
efficient methods of acquiring, developing,
renovating, operating, and maintaining
facilities and programs that provide high-
quality and relevant recreational benefits
to the public. Provide options for long-
term financial sustainability to help ensure
an enduring, vibrant, and viable park and
recreation system.
GOAL P&OS-16: Investigate proven and
practical methods offinancing park and
recreational requirements, including joint
ventures with other public agencies and
private organizations, and private donations.
\ POLICY P&OS-16.1: lnvestigate various
public financing options that may
contribute to a long-term, sustainable
approach to finance a vibrant, relevant,
safe, and attractive parkand recreation
system.
\ POLICY P&OS-16.2: Where feasible and
desirable, consider joint ventures with
King County, Kent, Highline, and Federal
Way School Districts, regional, state,
federal, and other public agencies, and
private organizations to acquire, develop
and manage recreational facilities (i.e.,
swimming pool, off-leash park, etc.).
\ POLICY P&OS-16.3: Maintain and work
with foundations and non-profits to
investigate grants and solicit donations
to provide secondary support for facility
development, acquisition, maintenance,
programs, services, and operating needs.
Earthworks Pork
119
Old Fishing Hole
120
�
2"Hild
Old fishing Hole
chapter
Conclusion 06
K E N T
P&OS
PLAN
2022
conctulion o1d Ne-xf Sfep-s
Considering all the data and analysis in these pages, the 2022 Parks
and Open Space Plan (2022Plan) comes down to one fundamental
objective: equitable access to high-quality parks and recreation for
all. This plan covers a lot of ground as it describes who we are as a
community and attempts to answer where we ore, where we ore
going, and how we will get fiere. While Kent's park system has
improved significantly over the last six years, what we choose to
do from here will have a lasting impact on how our parks meet the
growing and changing demand into the future.
ln our community engagement efforts, the survey showed that
residents are generally satisfied with the maintenance and the variety
and quality of offerings in our park system. While satisfaction with
parks is high, responses also emphasized a need for improved safety
and maintenance, which indicates that the standards for maintenance
we have set should be supported into the future. Top priority
amenities across all regions and demographics showed a focus on
restrooms, access to nature, trails, and community gathering space.
The park system's properties and assets are set up well to achieve
these objects with the right strategic investments'
Whereas previous plans looked at data snapshots to make decisions,
the 2022 Plan seeks to integrate Level of Service (LOS) data as a layer
ofour geospatial data and analysis. Mapping LOS with park access,
transit, population density, and racial and social equity created
a platform for dynamic and ongoing analysis of our system that
responds to the evolving needs of Kent residents. Proper staffing
is needed to realize continued benefit from this mapping effort to
ensure the department can use the data for real time decision making
between park plan updates. GlS will be a core business function
within our department into the future.
Pork Need
Cu rre nt Recreofionol Volue
Pork Need
Potentiol Re creoti o nol V ol u e
The Athletic Field Capacity study outlines the limitations of our
current inventory of athletic facilities, system improvements that
can add capacity in key areas, and the need for partnership with the
Kent School Distr;ct to meet the growing demand. This multifaceted
approach will ensure that athletic programming continues the trend
of excellence and that operational efficiency for both entities is
maximized.
Each ofthese efforts is rolled into a detailed prioritization of projects
based on four goals and nine project outcomes:
rfr f-
,*.rJB72P'osrommi"n -F Maintenonc17fsJG
G"Partnership2#3@
Noturol
Resources
Operotions &
These projects are geographically comprehensive and delicately
balance the need for capital reinvestment. acquisition, and new
development. Funding and completing these capital projects is only
half of the narrative, as we must also adequately fund operations
and maintenance (O&M) to prevent system failure.The maintenance
backlog needs to be cleared and proportional O&M funding must be
allocated as needed reinvestment adds Recreational Value, LOS gaps are
filled, and user demand grows as Kent's population continues to grow.
Athletics
Trqils
The recommendations described above and the strategic project list
become integrated into other city planning efforts including but not
limited to the City Comprehensive Plan and the bi-annual budget
process. This will not be a plan that sits on a shelf; rather, staff will use
this plan routinely to implement work and will be a reference for other
departments to better understand park-related work.
Access
(sq,s
L---Equity Strolegic
Amenities
TRANSPARENCY &
COMMUNICATION
DIVERS]TY OF HIGH.
OUATITYAMENITY
SYSTEM
RESILIENCY
The real work begins after adoption of this plan. ln addition to the list
of strategic projects, some logical next steps have surfaced from our
engagement and analysis:
\ Asset Monogement Softwore
With a comprehensive inventory of GIS data related to park assets,
Kent Parks will proceed with acquisition and implementation of
an asset management software to create better data around O&M
needs and articulate those funding needs more clearly in future
budget cycles.
\ Additionol Funding for Operoting ond Copitol Budgets
To keep pace with the needs for capital reinvestment/
development and ongoing maintenance, Kent Parks needs a
boost to both capital and operating budgets. Sustainable funding
will require a combination of funding strategies.
\ Noture Score Methodology
The public survey showed access to nature as one ofthe most
highly sought-after park amenities in our system. Equipped with
GlS layers, next steps involve a more sophisticated inventory of
our natural assets and an analysis ofequitable distribution.
\ Gools ond Policies Updote
We acknowledge that the goals and policies published in this plan
need updating.To avoid redundant work, Kent Parks is planning
a holistic update to all goals, policies, and procedures across all
divisions ofthe department in the next 2-3 years, using this and
other departmental planning efforts to inform the process.
\ Hire Full-Time GIS Position
The GIS data gathered through this plan has proven its worth.
Without dedicated resources to manage and update this data,
we risk the loss of this important work and will be forced to defer
some of the initiatives started here. A full-time GIS position is a
critical need.
\ Kent School District Portnership
Kent Parks will pursue an updated partnership agreement with
Kent School District. This agreement may initially focus on athletic
field use and O&M efficiency. but hopefully extend to ideas like
school parks, public-use hours, and more.
\ Porks Strotegic Fromework
As referenced in the planning section, Kent Parks will conduct
a planning effort to roll-up each of our divisional planning
documents into an overall strategic framework for parks to
achieve the plans we set.
\ CAPRA Accrediiotion
For the first time in its history, Kent Parks will seek accreditation
through the Commission for Accreditation of Park and Recreation
Agencies under the National Recreation and Park Association. The
goal is to achieve this by 2025.
This is not intended to be an exhaustive list of next steps but lays out
the major milestones we hope to achieve before the next P&OS Plan
update in 2028.
125
ln closing, Kent Parks offers our sincere thanks to all residents
who offered their time and perspective on how to improve the
park system. This plan is for you; without your input, it would lose
significance. This plan sets us up with the tools to achieve the vision
for parks that all Kent residents deserve. Over the next six years, Kent
Parks will work with the community to put these tools to use to help
make Kent a healthier, happier, and safer place to live, work, and play.
Russell Rood, credit: Tom Groy
126
KENT
WASHINGToN
sTAl'ri oF WASI{INGTON, COUNTY OF KING }
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
PUBLIC NOTICE
Rudi Alcott, being first duly sworn on oath that he is the
Vice President of Advertising for Sound Publishing,
which publishes the
Kent Reporter
a weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal ncwspaper of gcneral
circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to thc date
of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the llnglish language
continuously as a weekly newspaper in King County, Washington, 'I'he
Kent- Covington Reporter has been approved as a l,egal Newspaper by ordcr o[
the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County.
The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues o1'
the Kent- Covington l{eporter (and not in supplcment" form) which was rcgularly
disuibuted to its subscribers during the below statcd pcriod.'fhc anncxed
notice, a:
Public Notice #K8N9s7040
was published on June 24r 2022
The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the
sumof $217 69
l{udi A}cott
Vice President, Advert ising
Subscribed and sworn to me this 8'h day of September,2022 .
'tiibbett, Notary Public for thc Statc of Washington, Residing in
ng, Washington ttlllt
DER
gsT,ARr
PUg.LIC
WA
;;.ri.'-'a&-.t*.:r*l :ii,:'.:r+o.'i+1ffii#g.:
CITY OF KENT
NOTICE OF ORDI.
NANCES
PASSED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL
The following are 6um-
maries of otdinances
passed by the Kent Cilv
Council on June 21.anna
ORDINANCE NO. 4430
- AN ORDINANCE of lhe
City Council of lhs Cityof Kent, Washington,
amending Chapter 2.34
of the Kent Ciiy Code.entitle.' "Municipal
Court". to adjust the
salarie$ for Judges. JUdg-es pro lem. and courl
conrmissioners. This or-
dinance shall take etfect
and be in force 30 days
from and after it5 pas-
sage, as provided by
law. Oncs this ordinanceis effective. llle salary
provisiqns shall apply
retroactively to July 1.
2022. All other provi-
sions. it any, shall applv
prospectively.
ORDINANCE NO. 4431
- AN ORDINANCE of the
Crty Council of lhe City
of Kenl. Washrnlrlon. va-
cating a portion ol Na-
don Slreet. also knowi)
as Naden A.venue. and
reserving an easenrent-
Thrs ordinanc€ shall take
effect and be in full force
five days after the date
of publicalion, as provid-
€d by law.
ORDINANCE NO.4432
- AN ORDINANCE of lhe
City Council of the Cily
of Kent. Washinglon. va-
cating a portion of right-
of-way consisting of an
alleyway situated be-
tw6en propertiss located
between Railroad Ave-
nue S. to the west and
Bridges Avenue S. to the
east, and E. Russell St.
lo the no(h and E. Mor-
Classified Proof
I ..'e "5r,.: .. . ' .
Proofbd by Jennifer Tribbett, 09108/7022 I l:12:28 arn Pagc: 2
Classified Proof
d*€iii *ffii;si'riY' ':l':i;;
ton Streel to the $outh.
and reseruing an ease-
ment and lhe right to
grant easements. This
ordinanco shall take ef-
fect and be in force 30
days konr and afler its
passage. as p,ovded by
law.
oRoINANCE NO. 4433
- AN OROINANCE of the
Ciiy Council of the City
of Kent. Washington,
amendrng the Parks and
Recrealion Elomant of
the city's Comprehen-
sve Plan related io th€
adoption oI lhe 2Q22-
2027 Pa'ir. and Open
Space Plan.
(CPA-2021-8). Thrs ordi-
narfce shall lake eftect
and be in force 3O days
from and after the date
of passage as provided
bv law
ORDINANCE NO. 4434
- AN ORDINANC€ of the
City Council ol lhe Cily
of Kent. Washington. re-
pealing Section 2 of Or
dinence No. 4234 thalhad adopted Kent's
2017 Surface Water De-
sign Manual. and adopt-ing Kenl's new 2O22
SurtacB Wat6r Design
Manual. This ordinance
shall take effect and be
in force 30 days from
and after its passage. as
provKled by law.
ORDINANCE NO. 4435
- AN OROINANCE of the
Cily Council o{ the City
ol Kent, Washinglon. re-
lalng to land us6 and
zonrng. speclfically the
rezorring ol a 2.23-acreparcel located al
24032 116th Ave SE.
Kent. Washinglon from
NCC (Neighborhood
Convenience Commer-
cial) to MRT-16 (Multi-
family Residential Town-
house Dislrict) Thrs
ordinanco shall take ef-
{€6t and be in force 30
days from and atter its
passage.
A copy ot th6 conrplete
lext of any ordrnance will
be mailed upon teqtrest
af the Crq/ Clerk
Kimbedey A. Komolo,
Crty Clerk
Kkonloto@KenlWA gov
?53-856-5725
#957040
06t24t22
Prooi'ed by Jennifer Tribbett, 09/08/2022 I l: l2:28 am Page: 3