HomeMy WebLinkAbout4415ORDINANCE NO. 44L5
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, amending the Kent
Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities
Element to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the
Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts
(cPA-202L-4).
RECITALS
A. The State of Washington Growth Management Act (GMA)
requires internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements and the
plans from other jurisdictions.
B. To assure that comprehensive plans remain relevant and up to
date, the GMA allows amendments to the capital facilities element of
comprehensive plans concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a city
budget. RCW 36.70A, 130(2)(a)(iv).
C. The City of Kent has established procedures for amending the
Comprehensive Plan in Chapter L2.02 of the Kent City Code (KCC), allowing
amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan
concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the City budget and
allowing the City Council to hold the public hearing instead of the Land Use
and Planning Board, as laid out in KCC 12.02.010.
I Comprehensive PIan Amendment
2027-2022 - 2026-2027 School
Dist. Capital Facilities Plans
D. The Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts have
submitted proposed amendments to their Capital Facilities Plans to be
included in an amendment of the City's Capital Facilities Element of the
Comprehensive Plan.
E. After providing appropriate public notice, the City Council of
the City of Kent considered the requested Comprehensive Plan amendment
and held a public hearing on the same on October 19,2O2L.
F. On September 13, 202I, the City provided the required 60 day
notification under RCW 36.70A.106 to the State of Washington of the City's
proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive
Plan. The 60 day notice period has passed, and by operation of law, it is
deemed approved.
G. On November 16, 202L, the City Council of the City of Kent
approved the Capital Facilities Element amendment CPA-2020-1 to include
the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School
Districts, as set forth in Exhibit "A" dttached and incorporated by this
reference.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT,
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE
SECTION 7. - Amendment. The Kent Comprehensive Plan, and its
Capital Facilities Element, are amended to include the Capital Facilities Plans
of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts, as setforth in Exhibit
"A" attached and incorporated by this reference (CPA-202L-4).
Corrections by Citv Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon
2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
2O27-2022 - 2026-2027 School
Dist. Capital Facilities Plans
SECTION 2.
9ECTION 2, - Corrections by city clerk or code Reviser. upon
approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are
authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the
correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering; or
references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations.
SECTION 3, - Severability. If any one or more section, subsection,
or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, that
decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance
and the same shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 4. - Effective Date. This ordinance will take effect and be
in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law.
DANA RALPH, MAYO
November 16, 2021
Date Approved
ATTEST:
KIMBERLEY A.OTO, CITY LERK
APPROVED AS TO
R "PAT' FITZPATRICK, CITY ATTORN
November 16. 2021
Date Adopted
November 19. 2021
Date
EY
Publ
3 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
2O27-2022 - 2026-2027 School
Dist. Capital Facilities PIans
EXHIBIT A
.L
J&KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
EQUITY I EXCELLENCE i COMMUNITY
Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan
2020-2021 th rough 2026-2027
June 2O2l
Kent School District No. 415
r2o33 sE 256* street
Kent, Washington 98030-6643
(2s31373-729s
BOARD of DIRECTORS
Ms. Denise Daniels, President
Ms. Michele Bettinger, Vice President
Ms. Maya Vengadasalam, Legislative Representative
Ms. Leslie Hamada, Director
Mr. Joe Bento, Director
ADMINISTRATION
Dr. Calvin J. Watts
Superintendent of Schools
lsrael Vela, Chief School Operations and Academic Support Officer
Dr. Jewelle Harmon, Chief Accountability Officer
Mr. Benjamin Rarick, Executive Director of Fiscal Services Mr.
Dave Bussard, Director of Capital Planning & Facilities
Table of Contents
l- Executive Summary ............3
ll - Six - Year Enrollment Projection .........5
lll - Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" ...............6
Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan
Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students....
Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students....
7
7
lV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools .9
V - Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan .......... ....................10
Vl - Portable Classrooms ............12
Vll - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity 13
14Vlll- Finance Plan
lX - Summary of Changes to June 2020 Capital Facilities Plan .......... ..........15
16
| - Executive Summary
This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan has been prepared by the Kent School District as the
organization's capital facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of
Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C.27A.43 and Cities of Kent,
Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual Plan
update was prepared using data available in the spring of 202Lfor the 202L-2O22 school year'
This annual update of the Plan reflects no new major capital projects, and an inflation-based
adjustment to prior year impact fee rates.
This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School
District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's
needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long-Range Capital Facilities Plans
consistent with Board Policies, taking into accou nt a longer or shorter time period, other factors
and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required.
Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan
King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and Renton and included in the
Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. This Plan has
also been submitted to cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac for their information
and inclusion in their Comprehensive Plans.
ln order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District,
the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee- implementing ordinance
for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the
cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school
impact fee ordinances.
This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current and
future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public lnstruction establishes square
footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for local program needs in the
District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize
the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for
students of the District,
This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Program
capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs
served in each building. Portables in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service
as the permanent facilities.
The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District's standard of
service and the existing inventory of permanent facilities. The District's program capacity
3
of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the state's mandated reduction of class
size to meet the standard of service for Kent School District. Portables provide additional
tra nsitional capacity.
Kent School District is the fifth largest (FTE basis) district in the state. Enrollment is
electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public lnstruction
('OSPl")on Form P-223.Although funding apportionment is based on AnnualAverage Full Time
Equivalent (AAFTE), enrollment on October f. is a widely recognized "snapshot in time" that is
used to report the District's enrollment for the year as reported to OSPI.
The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of transitional
facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The District plans to continue
to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of portables.
This Plan currently represents projects in process funded primarily by the Kent School District's
2016 Bond, as well as the 2018 Capital Construction Levy. Additional information about these
projects can be found on the district's capital projects homepage (link). Additionally, project
updates sent to our community of stakeholders can be accessed on the KSD website (link).
Based on revised student generation rates, and district enrollment projects, the district has
updated the proposed student impact fee rate for the coming year. For a short overview, see
Section lX (Summary of Changes to the June 2020 Capital Facilities Plan).
4
ll - Six - Year Enrollment Projection
For capital facilities planning, enrollment growth projections are based on cohort survival and
student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years (See
Tabte 2). For this Plan, the district relied substantially on the results from Dr. Les Kendrick's study
of long-range enrollment forecasts for the Kent School District in the Fall of 2020.
King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine
the number of kindergartners entering the system (See Table Ll.6.85% of 26,OLL King County live
births in 2016 is projected for 1,,789 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2021. This
is an increase of 524live births in King County over the previous year (See Toble 2).
Early Childhood Education students (also identified as "ECE"), "Early Childhood Special Education
('ECSE") students are forecast and reported to OSPI separately on Form P-223H for Special
Education Enrollment. Capacity is reserved to serve students in the ECE programs at elementary
schools.
ln addition to live birth data, enrollment projections for October I,zlztgoing forward rely upon
the results of the enrollment study by Dr. Kendrick, utilizing the "medium growth" methodology.
Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The District will
continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools. lnformation on new
residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions
will be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections.
The Kent School District serves eight permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the
cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, and Auburn and smaller portions of the cities of SeaTac, Black
Diamond, and Maple Valley.
5
STUDENT GEN ERATION FACTOR
"Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how
many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records
of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last ten years.
Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School District is as follows:
Single Family
Multi-Family
Elementary
Middle School
Senior High
Total
Elementary
Middle School
Senior High
Total
.277
.o7L
.086
.435
.258
.058
.100
.4t6
The student generation factor is based on a survey of l-,399 single-family dwelling units and 1,020 multi-
family dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy rates'
tn preparing the2O2t-2O22to2O26-2027 Capitd Facilities Plan the District contracted with Dr. Les Kendrick
of Educational Data Solutions LLC, a noted expert in demographic studies for school districts, to analyze and
prepare the student generation factor. EDC included both "garden" and "urban style" apartments in the
calculation for multi-family residences.
Within the district's borders there are several low-income and multi-family housing projects coming
on-line in2O2L.Once developed with occupancy occurring the District does recognize that the student
generation for multi-family housing may impact future Capital Facilities Plan updates.
6
For 2021 GFP - Headcount Enrollment History
LB = Live Births LB in 2007 LB in 2008 LB in 2009 LB in 2010 LB in 2011 LB in 2012 LB in 20'13 LB in 2014 LB in 2015
October HC Enrollment
King County Live Births
2012
24.899
2013
25,222
2014
25,057
2015
24,514
2016
24,630
2017
25,032
2018
24,910
2019
25,348
2020
25.487
lncrease / Decreas€655 323 -1 65 -543 116 402 280 316 139
Kindergarten / Birth o/o 1 8.57%8.40o/o 8.34%8.34%8.170/.8.14o/o 7.98Yo 7.930/"6.68%
Kindergarten 2,134 2,119 2,090 2.045 2,013 2,037 1,989 2,010 1,703
Grade 'l 2,017 2,186 2,127 2,131 2,067 2,056 2,061 2,036 1,882
Grade 2 1,905 2,055 2,190 2,163 2j63 2,O77 2,008 2,091 1,980
Grade 3 2,082 1,922 2,070 2,176 2,195 2,143 2,043 1,995 2,001
Grade 4 2,000 2.087 1,956 2,089 2,195 2,218 2,118 2,038 1,912
Grade 5 2,044 2,008 2,116 1,958 2,103 2,189 2,169 2,120 1,937
Grade 6 2,026 2,079 2,023 2,058 1,952 2120 2,184 2,164 2,024
Grade 7 Middre schoor 2,139 2,046 2,104 1,974 2.021 1,922 2,O44 2.166 2,010
Grade 8 2,139 2,121 2,091 2,100 2,021 2,043 1.882 2,073 2,086
Grade 9 Senior High 2,455 2.483 2,428 2,093 2,105 2,006 2,004 1,888 2,006
Grade 10 2.O92 2,046 2,151 2,165 2,099 2,080 1,946 2,035 1,813
Grade 11 1,933 1,873 1.802 1 ,818 1,865 1,823 1,732 1,663 1,744
Grade 12 1.646 1,539 1,576 1,742 1,730 1,810 1,654 '1,634 1,484
Total Enrollment 2 26,612 26,564 26,724 26,512 26,529 26,524 25,834 25,913 24,582
Yearly Headcount
lncrease / Decrease -o
-219
-48 160 -212 17 q -bvu 79 -'1,331
Cumulative lncrease -267 107 -3,1 I -302 -307 -997 -918 -2,249
to Full Day Kindergaften for all schools
This number indicates actual births in King County 5 years prior to enrollment year as updated by Washington State Department of
Health, Center for Health Statistics. Keni School Distrlct percentage based on actual Kindergarten enrollment 5 years later
2 Enrollment reported to OSPI on Form P-223 generates basic education fundinq and excludes Early Childhood Special Education
("ECSE'& "B2" or Birth to 2 Preschool lnclusive Education) and excludes College-only Running Start students.
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415
ocToBER REPORT 1251H (HEADCOUNT) ENROLLMENT HISTORY
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 1 May 2021
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415
SIX-YEAR ENROLLMENT PROJECTION
2020 - 2026 Enrollment Projections
Full Day Kindergarten at all Elem LB in 2015 LB in 2016 LB in 2017 LB in 2018 LB in 2019 LB in 2020 Est LB in 2021
ACTUAL
ENROLLMENT
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT
October 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
King County Live Births 25,487 26,01',|25,274 24,337 24,090 23,849 23,611
lncrease / Decreas€139 524 -737 -937 1,184 -1.425 -726
Kinderqarten I Birlh o/o 6.68o/o 6.88o/o 6.88o/o 6.940k 6.80%6.65%6.51o/o
FD Kindergarten 1,703 t,789 1,739 1,688 7,637 1,587 1,536
Grade 1 1,882 7,787 L,945 1,950 r,95t r,944 r,937
Grade 2 1,980 1,968 7,845 2,000 2,002 1,998 L,992
Grade 3 2,001 2,052 2,0r4 1,880 2,O35 2,033 2,O27
Grade 4 1,912 2,083 2,110 2,062 7,922 2,O76 2,074
Grade 5 1,937 L,979 2,130 2,148 2,097 1_,949 2,705
Grade 6 2,O24 2,013 2,O32 2,r77 2,r93 2,L35 1,98s
Grade 7 rriddre schoor 2,O10 2,060 2,024 2,033 2,176 2,t88 2,r30
Grade 8 2,086 2,705 2,r30 2,085 2,09L 2,233 2,245
Grade 9 Senior High 2,006 2,163 2,1.57 2,r73 2,t25 2,126 2,270
Grade 10 1,813 2,078 2,2L3 2,t97 2,2r0 2,t57 2,157
Grade 11 1,744 1,625 7,84r 1,951 1,934 7,942 1,894
Grade 12 1,484 r,707 r,57t r,772 r,877 1,855 1,853
Total Enrollment Projection 24,582 25,470 25,751 26,117 26,250 26,224 26,215
Yearly lncrease/Decrease -1,331 824 341 366 133 -26 -9
Yearly lncrease/Decrease %-5.14o/o 3.37o/o 1.34o/o 1.42o/o O.51o/o -O.1Oo/o -0.03o/o
Total Enrollment Projection 24,582 25,410 25,751 26,117 26,250 26,224 26,215
Live births for Krng County are estimates lot yeat 2021
Sourcei Les Kendrick 2021 um Grolvth Model")
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 May 2021
lll- Current Kent School District "standard of Service"
ln order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County Code 214.06
references a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain
its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the
number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined
by the district which would best serve the student population.
This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District
has identified schools with significant special needs programs as "impact" schools and the
standard of service targets a lower-class size at those facilities. Portables included in the
capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanentfacilities.
The standard of service defined herein will continue to evolve in the future. Kent School
District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes
to capacity and standard of service. This process will affect various aspects of the District's
standard of service and future changes will be reflected in future capitalfacilities plans.
6
Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students
Class size ratio for grades K - 3 is planned for an average of 23 students per class, not
to exceed 26.
Class size ratio for grades 4 - 6 is planned for an average of 27 students per class, not
to exceed 29.
Some special programs require specialized classroom space and the program capacity of some
of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their
regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in special programs and
space must be allocated to serve these programs'
Students may also be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate
classroom or facility.
Some identified students will also be provided educational opportunities in classrooms for
special programs such as those designated as follows:
English Learners (EL)
Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title l)- Federal Program
Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) - State Program
Highly Capable Students - State Program
Reading, math or science Labs
Dual Language Programs in four elementary schools
lnclusive Education Service for Elementary and Secondary students with disabilities may be
provided in a separate or self-contained classroom sometimes with a capacity of 1-0- 1-5
depending on the program.
Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students
The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational
opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school
buildings per the negotiated collective bargaining agreement with KEA'
. The average class size ratio for grades 7-8 is 30 students per class and 143 students
per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of L50 based on five class periods
per day.
a
a
7
The average class size ratio for grades 9-t2is 32 students per class and 153 students
per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 160 based on five class periods
per day.
Like lnclusive Education Programs listed above, many other secondary programs require
specialized classroom space which can reduce the program capacity of the permanent school
buildings, such as technology labs, performing arts activities, a variety of career and technical
education programs, and other specialized programs.
Space or Class m Utilization
As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for
certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a workspace during their planning periods,
it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools.
Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the Kent School District has
determined that the standard utilization rate is 95%for secondary schools. Program capacity
at elementary schools reflects LOO% utilization at the elementary level.
8
lV - lnventory and Capacity of Existing Schools
Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 28,564 students and
transitional (portable) capacity to house 2,085. This capacity is based on the District's Standard
of Service as set forth in Section lll. lncluded in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools
by type, address and current capacity (SeeTobte 3). The ratio between permanent capacity and
porta ble capacity is 94.9%-5.\%.
The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs, additional classrooms
and new schools. Program capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes
implemented in the Fall of 2O2O.
Calculation of Elementary, Middle School and Senior High School capacities are set forth in
Appendices A, B, and C. Maps of existing schools are included.
For clarification, the following is a brief description of some of the non-traditional programs
for students in Kent School District:
The 2O2L-2022 school year will have two academy programs within the district housed at our
new Kent Laboratory Academy. The project was approved by the Kent Board of Directors in
2019 by utilizing funding from the 2016 Bond Project "20 Classrooms". The new facility has
24 classrooms and will now be utilized for many types of Academy related programs. The
previous facility of these two programs (Kent Phoenix Academy Campus) will have the voter
approved 2018 Levy Projects completed and will be available for additional capacity for our
District at the secondary level.
iGrad - Kent School District has developed the lndividualized Graduation and Degree Program
or "iGrad" . iGrad offers a second chance to students aged L6-2'1, who have dropped out of high
school and want to earn a high school diploma. iGrad is not included in this Capital Facilities
Plan because it is served in leased space at the Kent Hill Plaza Shopping Center. Over the past
three years, enrollment in the iGrad program has averaged over 300 students.
I
KENT SCHOOL DISTRIGT No.415
INVENTORY and CAPAGITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS
SCHOOL Year
Opened ABR ADDRESS
2021 - 2022
Program
Capacity
Carriage Crest Elementary
CedarValley Elementary
Covington Elementary
Crestwood Elementary
1 990
197 1
2018
1 980
CC 18235 - 140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058
CV 26500 Timbedane Way SE, Covington 98042
CO 2581 1 156th Avenue SE, Covington 98042
CW 25225 - lSlthAvenue SE, Covington 98042
428
360
630
408
East Hill Elementary
Emerald Park
Fairwood Elementary
1 953
1 999
1 969
1992
464
477
386
432
EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031
EP 1'1800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031
FW 16600 - 148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058
DE I 1310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030GeorgeT. Daniel Elementary
Glenridge Elementary
Grass Lake Elementary
Horizon Elementary
1 996
197 I
'r990
1 987
431
428
477
384
GR 19405 -'l20th Avenue SE, Renton 98058
GL 28700 -'l91st Place SE, Kent 98042
HE 27641 - 144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042
JC 26915 - 186th Avenue SE, Covinston 98042Jenkins Creek Elementarv
Kent Elementary
Kent Valley Early Learning Center
Lake Youngs Elementary
Martin Sortun Elementary
KE 24700-64thAvenueSouth, Kent 98032
KV 317 ---4lh Ave S, Kent, WA 98032
LY '19660-142ndAvenue SE, Kent 98042
MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030
MR 27710 - 1081h Avenue SE, Kent 98030Meadow Ridse Elementarv
1 999
2014
1 965
1987
1 994
454
318
497
455
454
Meridian Elementary
Millennium Elementary
Neely-O'Brien Elementary
1 939
2000
1 990
2009
ME 25621 - 140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042
ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98030
NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032
PL 120225E 216th Street, Kent, 98031
497
478
454
552PantherLake Elementarv
Park Orchard Elementary
Pine Tree Elementary
Ridgewood Elementary
River Ridge Elementary
I 963
'1967
1987
2021
1 994
PO
PT
RW
RR
SW
11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031
27825 - 1181h Avenue SE, Kent 98030
18030 - 162nd Place SE, Renton 98058
00000 - 22420 Military Rd S SeaTac, WA
463
487
477
758
477Sawyer Woods E 31 135 - 228th Ave SE. Black Diamond 9B010
Scenic Hill Elementary
Soos Creek Elementary
Springbrook Elementary
Sunrise Elementary
Elementary TOTAL
Cedar Heights Middle School
Mattson Middle School
Meeker Middle School
Meridian Middle School
Mill Creek Middle School
Northwood Middle School
Middle School TOTAL
Kent-Meridian High School
Kentlake Senior High School
Kentridge Senior High School
Kentwood Senior High School
Senior High TOTAL
Kent Laboratory Academy
Kent Phoenix Academy
DISTRICT TOTAL
1 960
1971
1 969
1992
1 951
I 997
1 968
1 981
2021
2007
SH
SC
SB
SR
KLA
PH
26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030
'12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031
20035 - 100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031
22300 - 132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042
00000 - 208th St Kent, WA 98030
11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98030
454
360
396
477
1 993
1 981
I 970
1 958
2005
I 996
895
787
832
792
916
926
CH 19640 SE 272 Sfieel, Covington 98042
MA 16400 SE 251st Slreet, Covington 98042
MK '12600 SE 'l92nd Street, Renton 98058
MM 23480-120th AvenueSE, Kent 98031
MC 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032
NW 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058
KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98030
KL 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042
KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031
KW 25800 - 164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042
13,813
5,'148
1,904
1,957
2,277
2,159
8,297
456
850
28,564
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Tabh 3 May 2021
Kent School District Demographic Report
t *r.y. n.t, , . l. t,:{.
S[ 30,1rfi St
Loa Hill
5L I12lh Sr
8ifi $ r
st
6
(rr
'4
d
3E
s
:4
D
:
hq
"qA,"c- |
. "t'*
nto" N
ES
-!
t
d
€I
*
&
tn
ry
*rf ,'r
SE ?!lnd gt e Valley
flk Rrn
ilolf C I ub
sA!\ryER
w00D9
5E
HBn
Ril
OFen i
'6+
tJ\
F
t
h
l?nd $ t
!,
IA
'd..
E5
t
E
5t 2E
E
F
$
'
r
I
:
I
I
l
I
I
I
-ja
I
aq
rn
FirI
h!t
E51:
:j
;
Elementary Current
CarriageCrest-458, CedarValley-231, Covington-594 Crestwood-429, Daniel -437, EastHill -463, EmeraldPark-466, Fairwood-321'
Glenridge-467, Grasslake-361, Horizon-406, JenkinsCreek-391, Kent-612,KentMt.View-102, LakeYoungs-465,
Martin Sortun - 601, Meadow Ridge-455, Meridian -477, Millennium -600, NeelyO'Brien - 715, PantherLake- 628, ParkOrchard -402'
PineTree-3B0,Ridgewood-484,SawyerWoods-420, ScenicHill -560, SoosCreek-354, Springbrook-508, Sunrise-632
Map provided by David Demographics May 2021
Kent School District Demographic Report - Middle Schools
I
i d
I
t
s
1
M9
ta tllaoir.-.
a
*
Iq
iIgl)
Sound
llohedyefrx
'io
rssts
Cedar Heights -63s,
Mill
Mattson - 643, Meeker - 697,
Creek - 850, Northwood - 590Meridian - 607
0 2.75 5.5 11 km
Sou@s: €sri, HERE. tuLorft, USGS. ld.tn6r, INCREMEM g
NRC.[ EsriJ.p.n. METI. EstiChin. (hns Ko@), Es.iKors!.Es,
(bihnd). Mapmtndb. NGCC, @ OFnst..lMap .ortdbuto.s,
ildrhe Grs usrcdmq.ry
1:144,444
1 75 3.5 7mi
hvt3 o6nog.phk.ePhnni€
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilitles Plan May 2021
Kent School District Demographic Repoft - High Schools
t
cq
t1t
I
."'
L
I
3
a
Pug6l Sound
I
3
h*
t
I
6t
,9 tri*!.
!
xhst
[.. Hll
HS
a
l
frffi.u.t t
High Schools and Current Enr0llment
Kent Meridian - 1858-Kentlake - 1309,
Kentridge - 1697 Kentwood - 1560
1:144,444
175 35 7mi
Kent School District Slx-Year Capital Facilitjes Plan
o 275 5.5 11 h
So[@5: Esri, HERE, &Lor@, USGS. ld.tm!p. INCREM€M e
NRCar €snJrp.n, METI. €silchin. (h.e Kons). E*iKoro6, E3ti
Obibnd), Mrpny'ndia. NGCC, o oFnsrs.rM.p .onttullors,
ild tieGls Us.rCdmlnily
May 2021 &p by: Schoost. !o.!ror
&vi5D6mosapnbs& Ph.ni4
V - Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan
ln Novembe r 20'J,6, the voters of the Kent School District approved a bond measure for
SZSZ million. This new bonding authority provided for the replacement for Covington
Elementary school, which opened in August of 2018, a new elementary school in the Kent Valley
(Currently being built at the former location of Kent Mountain View Academy - River Ridge
Elementary), and the twenty additional classrooms project redirected by the Kent School
Board to build a 20 classroom Kent Academy Facility housing multiple academy programs in
our district, which is currently underway at the site of the Old Panther Lake ElementarySchool
(The Laboratory Academy).
At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring 202L, the following projects to increase
capacity will be a part of our student capacity in the Kent School District.
'Construction is more than 80% completed for the New Valley Elementary School (River
Ridge) on West Hill within the City Limits of SeaTac, WA. The 89,000 square foot K-6
school project is being funded with bond funds and impact fees from King County. lt will
open for the 2021,-2022 school year.
a
a
a
Construction is more than 95% complete for our new Kent Laboratory Academy at the
Old Panther Lake Elementary Site in Kent in order to free up space at the current Kent
Phoenix Academy location (formerly Sequoia Junior High) for additional classroom
space if needed and/or to open another middle school soon. The new 59,000 square
foot facility will accommodate a variety of Academy Programs within the Kent School
District.
Some funding for lease or purchase of additional portables may be provided by
impact fees as needed. Sites are based on need for additionalcapacity.
As a critical component of capital facilities planning, county and city planners and decision-
makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing
applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks
for pedestrian safety to and from school and bus stops as well as bus pull-outs and turn-
arounds.
lncluded in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which
are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future (See Toble 4 & Sitemap).
10
Voter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for some of these
and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is
secured for purchase of additional sites, but some may be funded with impact fees as needed.
Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements, and some
property may be traded or sold to meet futu re facility needs. The Boa rd of Directors has started
the process to sell surplus property over the last school year.
The Board will continue an annual review of standards of service and those decisions will be
reflected in each update of the Capital Facilities Plan.
11
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.415
Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity
T StatusLOCATIONSCHOOL/FACILIry/SITE
o/o lor
new
Growth
Projected
Complelion
Date
Projected
Program
on
NIap ELEMENTARY
Land Use
Designation
Land Use
Jurisdiction2 orHER strEs AceutRED#on
Map
6 New Valley Elementary School (River Ridge) Old Kent Mountain View Academy Site Elementary
Addition
Under
Construction 2021-2022 758 1000h
MIDDLE SCHOOL & SENIOR HIGH
3 New Academy Site (Kent Laboratory Academy) old Panther Lake Elementary site Academy
TEMPORARY FACILITIES
Portablesl TBD - For placement as needed New
1 164th SE (Across from Maftson) 25230-25050 164th SE, Covington 98042
2 HamLakearea (Pollard) 16820SE240, Kent 98042
4 Shady Lk area (Sowers, Blaine, Drahota, Paroline) 174265E 192 Street' Renton 98058
5 SE of Lake Morton area (West property) SE 332 & 204 SE, Kent 98042
10 SouthCentralsite(Yeh) SE286thSt&124thAveSE,Auburn98092
12 2561n- Covington (Halleson) 25435 SE 256th, Covington 98042
12a 156th - Covington (Wikstrom) 25847 156th Ave SE, Covington 98042
Notes:
Under
Construction 2021-2022 456 lOQo/o
Additional
Capacity
Planning 2020+ 24 - 31 each llook
Rural
Rural
Urban
Rural
Urban
Rural
Rural
TBD
Elementary
Elementary
Secondary
TBD
To be sold
To be sold
King County
King County
King County
King County
King County
King County
King County
t TBD - To be determined - Some sites are identified but placement, timing and/or configuration of portables has not been determined
2 Numbers correspond to sites on Site Bank Map on Page 19. Other Map site locations are parcels identified in Table 7 on Page 29
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 May 2021
:
t.
AC
,.1,l
ct{fli
s ',/.:'
::1
Hwy
2!!!r'
212th
EI
l
K
::P
..
r'{,
z.v
't
l-5
a:i r.;
t:::., .
ool District
Site Acquisitions
& Projects
Kent
.. t-5 i
:/'
,,/ :., :!1,
:,!.: ':)
rSTAR
i
I
,;l
;lI
;i;l
rAt(t
[le
copyright KROLL MAP COMPANY, lNC. This map has been modlfied by KSo 08/01
| - Portable Classrooms
The Plan references use of portables as interim or transitional capacity and facilities.
Currently, the District utilizes portables to house students in excess of permanent capacity and
for program purposes at some school locations (Please see Appendices A, B,C).
Based on enrollment projections, implementation of full day kindergarten programs, lower
state mandated class sizes, program capacity, and the need for additional permanent capacity,
the District anticipates the need to purchase or lease additional portables during the next six-
year period to ensure capacity (Noted in section V. Six Yr. Planning Construction).
During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the
District's portableswill be replaced by permanentfacilities. Duringthe useful life of some of
the portables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in
others, and these portables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of
the community.
Portables may be used as interim or transitional facilities
1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent schoolfacilities.
2. To cover the gap between the times of demand for increased capacity and
completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand.
3. To meet unique program requirements.
Portables currently in the District's inventory are continually evaluated resulting in some being
improved and some replaced.
The Plan projects that the District will use portables to accommodate interim housing needs
for the next six years and beyond. The use of portables, their impacts on permanent facilities,
life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between portables, emerging
technologies, and educational restructuring will continue to beexamined.
12
Vll - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity
As stated in Section lV, the program capacity study is periodically updated for changes in
special programs and reflects class size requirements, class size fluctuations etc. As shown in
the lnventory and Capacity chart in Table 3, the program capacity is also reflected in the
capacity and enrollment comparison charts (See Tables 5 & 5a-b-c)'
Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding
apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is
widely recognized as the enrollment "snapshot in time" to report enrollment for the year.
Kent School District continues to be the fifth largest district (both FTE and headcount basis) in
the state of Washington. The P-223 Headcount for October 2020 was 24,587 with kindergarten
students counted at L.0 and excluding ECSE and college-only Running Start students.
ln October 2020, there were an additional 1-,L02 students in 11th and 12th grade participating
in the Running Start program at different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school
and college graduation. Of these students, 686 attended classes only at the college ("college-
only") and are excluded from FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons.
Kent School District has one of the highest Running Start program participation rates in the
state.
Based on the enrollment forecasts, permanent facility inventory and capacity, current
standard of service, portable capacity, and future additional classroom space, the District plans
to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of portables (See
Tsble 5 ond Tobles 5 o-b-c).
This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There may be a need
for additional portables and/or new schools to accommodate growth and additional programs
within the District. New schools may be designed to accommodate placement of future
portables. School attendance area changes, limited and costly movement of portables, zoning
changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in
addressing overcrowding and underutilization as well as possible overcrowding of facilities in
different parts of the District.
13
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
TOTAL DISTRICT
SCHOOL YEAR 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27
Actual PROJECTED
27,255
0
28,564 28,564 28,564 28,564 28,564 28564
0 0 0 0 0 0
Permanent Program Capacity I
Changes to Permanent Capacity 1
Capacity lncrease (F)
Additional Permanent Classrooms
Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 27.255 28.564 28.564 28,564 28,564 28,564 28,594
lnterim Portable Caoacitv
EIementary Portable Capacity Required
Middle School Portable Capacity Required
Senior High School Portable Capacity Required
1,248
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
00
lnterim Portable Capacity Total 1.248 0 0 0 0 0 0
564'l
TOTAL ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 2 24.582 24,410 25.751 26.117 26,250 26,224 26.215
DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 3,921 4,154 2,813 2,447 2,314 2,340 2,349
l Capacityisbasedonstandardofserviceforprogramsprovidedandisupdatedperiodicallytoreflectprogramchanges.
2 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2021 ("Medium Growth Model")
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 May 2021
Elementary Permanent Capacity 1
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
ELEMENTARY Grades K - 6
13,000 13,000 13,758 13,758 13,758 13,758 13,758
New Elementary School - Kent ValleY
Additional Permanent Classrooms z
758
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
subtotar 13,000 13,758 13,758 13,758 13,758 13,758 '13'758
Portable Capacity Required 1 1248 456 336 336 336 336 336
SCHOOL YEAR 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27
Actual PROJECTED
1 094111094 1214 1TOTAL CAPACITY
ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 3 13,439 13,671 13,815 13,905 13,837 13.723 13,657
SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 809 543 279 189 257 371 437
Number of Portables Required 52 19 14 14 14 14 14
'1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes.
2 Additional classrooms will be placed at schools with the greatest need for aleve overcrowding
3 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2021 ("Medium Growth Model")
Enrollment & Projections reflect FULL Day Kindergarten at ALL Elementary schools @ 1.0 & exclude ECSE Preschoolers.
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A May 2021
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
MIDDLE SCHOOL Grades 7 - 8
Middle School Permanent 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148
Changes to Middle School CapacitY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Subtotal 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148
0 0 0 0 0 0 0Portableired
SCHOOL YEAR 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-2027
Actual P ROJECTED
TOTAL CAPACITY 1&3 5,148 5,148 5,148 5.148 5,148 5,148 5,148
ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION ,4,096 4,164 4,154 4,118 4,267 4,421 4,374
1 984 994 1 881 727 774CAPACITYSURPLUSDEFI
NumberofPortablesRequired 0 0 0 0 0 0
No Classroom portables required at middle schools at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes.
1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to refleci program changes.
2 Projection source: Les Kendrick Demographic study, 2021 ("Medium Growth Model")
3 Surplus capacity due to grade level reconfiguration - All gth grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004
0
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B May 2021
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
SENIOR HIGH Grades I - 12
Senior High Permanent Capacity '8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297
Chanqes to Hiqh School Capacity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Subtotal 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297
Portables Ca uired 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SCHOOL YEAR 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-2025 2025-26 2026-27
Actual PROJECTED
TOTAL CAPACITY 1 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,297
ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 3 7,047 7,574 7,782 8,094 8,146 8,080 8,184
TY 217 113515 2031250SURPLUSEFI
NumberofPortablesRequired 0 0 0 0 0 0
No Classroom Portables required at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes.
1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes
3 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2021 ("Medium Growth Model")
0
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C May 2021
Vlll - Finance Plan
The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance
improvements for the years 2O2L-2O22 through 2026-2027. The financing components include
secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on future bond issues, state
school construction assistance, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management
Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act.
With River Ridge Elementary School (New Valley School Project) and Kent Laboratory Academy
(New Academy Project) coming on-line for school year 202L-2022, this will help support the
capacity issue that has been an issue for our district. The building rate within the City of Kent
and surrounding areas within our boundary continue to be robust. The district is likely to see
growth in enrollment due to these conditions.
ln Novembe r 2O16, the District held a special election to approve the authorization of
S252,OO0,0OO in bonding authority. The projects described above are part of this
authorization. The first series of bonds (S8O million) were issued in February 2017, which
funded the Covington Elementary Replacement School, as well as other infrastructure
projects. lmpact fees will be used at both the New Valley and Academy projects due to
escalation in construction pricing across the Pacific Northwest.
According to RCW 82.02.O9O, the definition of an impact fee is ". . . a payment of money
imposed upon development as a condition of development approval to pay for public facilities
needed to serve new growth and development, and that is reasonably related to the new
development that creates additional demand and need for public facilities, that is a
proportionate share of the cost of the public facilities, and that is used for facilities that
reasonably benefit the new development. 'lmpact fee' does not include a reasonable permit
or application fee." Mitigation or impact fees can be calculated on the basis of "unhoused
student need" or "the maintenance of a district's level of service" as related to new residential
development.
A mitigation/impact fee may be imposed based upon a determination of insufficient existing
permanent and/or portable school space or to pay for permanent and/or portable school
space previously constructed as a result of growth in the district. A district's School Board must
first approve the application of the mitigation or impact fees and, in turn, approval must then
be granted by the other general government jurisdictions having responsibility within the
district, counties, cities and towns. (Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley,
and SeaTac)
Though the current enrollment projections increase for both elementary and secondary
schools are relatively flat, the ongoing need to provide permanent instructional facilities to
house students is a driving need as the shifts in our family populations continue, due to
ongoing development. lmpact fees will be used to support and address the challenges related
to the number of temporary instructional facilities currently in use, the replacement of some
of these aged facilities, the maintenance of the district's level of services, and the potential
expansions to existing facilities in future years.
14
The Kent School District 2021, CFP update includes continued execution of the 2016 Capital Bond
Projects and anticipation of the data collection and review of our Facility Assessment Reports within
the coming months. With the opening of our River Ridge Elementary School and the Kent Laboratory
Academy, we are advancing opportunity to add capacity for our programs and student-based needs.
The District Facilities and Capital Planning Teams have been preparing to complete an initial plan
(Fall2O2ll as we move the next steps of creating a Capital Bond Planning Task Force (CBPTF) - which
will include District personnel, design professionals, teaching staff, student voice as well as
community members to being well collaborated discussions to this platform. Our initial plan has
revealed priorities including school replacement due to age, and the need for added permanent
facilities to (1-) reduce and eliminate our need for portables and (2) accommodate future growth as
housing in the Kent region continues to expand. Once the CBPTF has it will be brought before the
District's Board of Directors for comments, discussion, and approval. A Capital Bond Measure would
follow soon after approval. Portable purchases may be required before the Bond Measure passes as
it takes approximately three years from design to open for most large-scale projects such as schools
or added permanent capacity. Future updates to this Capital Facilities Plan will include detail of any
adopted planning.
For the Six-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School
District Capital Planning Team. Please see pages 73-14 for a summary of the cost basis.
Cost Basis Summary
For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last elementary school,
adjusted for inflation, and projected cost of the future elementary schools and additional
classrooms.
Project Projected Cost
New Elementary School
Kent Valley (To open Fall202L) - Board Approved Name
- River Ridge Elementary
s55,000,000
New Academy Facility (To open Fall2A2\ - Board
Approved Name - Kent Laboratory Academy
536,ooo,ooo
Site Acquisition Cost
The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the
last ten years. Please see Table 7 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages.
District Adjustment
The impact fee calculations on Appendix B & C include a "District Adjustment" which is equal
to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas total for this year and adjusted for the
decrease in the 2022 CY Consumer Price lndex (2.2%) for the Seattle metropolitan area
(Previously 2.5%for the 2021CY).
15
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.415
SIX-YEAR FII\IANCE PLAN
Table 6Kent school District Six-YearCapital Facilities Plan
secured
Local & Slale
lJnsecured
slate 2 or Local 3
lmpacl
_5Fees
Fstimeid Estimald
School Prcjects atthis lime.
TEMPORARY FACILITIES
Additional portables r-a
OTHER
N,/A
$0
$o
s0 $0 $o $o
F=Funded U=unfunded
NOTES:
'? The District anticipates .eceiving some state Funding Construction Assistance for some projecls.
3 Facility needs are pending review- Some of these prcjects may be funded with impact fees-
4 Cost of portables based on curent cosl and adjusted for inflation forfuture years.
s Fees in lhis column arc based on amount of fees collecled to date and estimated tees on future units
May 2021
Iype &
School / Site Torel Averaoe Cost / Acr€
Elemenlary
12 / urban Property Sale-29.7 acres of Plemons-Yeh site
7 / Rural Propedy Sale - ScaFella sile
3 / Rural Property Sale - Old Covington Parcel A, *362206-3081
3/ Rural Property Sale - Old Covington Parcel, #362206-9081
6 / Rural Propeny purchased for new elemenlary
2016
2015
2019
2021
201 I
SSE 124h Ave and 2841h ST SE
2900 Kent Black Diamond RD sE
17070 SE Wd Rd, Coving{on
17070 SE Wil Rd, Covinglon
29.70
13.25
8.00
8.00
10.00
$947,536
$330,000
$3,869,697
0,000,000
$1,770,355
$31,904
$24,906
$443,712
s0
s177,036
Eremenrary site sublotal 68.95 $6,917,588 $100,328
No Acquisitions for l\4iddle School 0.00 so
Middle School sile subtolal 0.00 $0 s0
Senaor High
No Ac4uisitions for Senior Highs 0.00 $0 $0
Senior Hish site sublotal 0.00 $0 $0
Note: All rural sitesw€re purchased piorlo adoption ol Urban GrM Area
17
Tobl Ac..add e Cost Tobl Averaqe cost/Acre
68.S5 56.917.588 i100,328
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.415
Site Acquisitions & costs
Avenge of Sites Purchased, Sold or Built on within last 10 YeaF
Table 7 May 2021Keot School Distdct Six-Year Capilal Faciliftes Plan
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
Student Generation Factors - Single Family
Elementary (Grades K - 6) 0.277
Middle School (Grades 7 - 8) 0.071
Senior High (Grades I - 12) _q9!9_
Total 0.435
Projected Increased Student Capacity
Elementary
Middle School
Senior High (Academy)
Required Site Acreage per Facility
Elementary (required)
Middle School (required)
Senior High (required)
Senior High
Total
OSPI - Square Footage Per Student
758 Elementary
Middle School
Senior High
Special Education
0
456
12 Average Site Cost / Acre
Elementary
Middle School
Senior High
25
38
$55,000,000 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost
Student Generation Factors - Multi-Family
Elementary 0.258
Middle School 0.058
0.1 00
0.416
115
148
173
??
$100.328
0
$o
Elementary @ 24
Middle School @ 29
Senior High @ 31
$o
$o
$o
New Facility Construction Cost
Elementary *
Middle School
Senior High * (Academy)
$o
$36,000,000
Temporary Facility Square Footage
Elementary
Middle School
Senior High
Total 4.3o/o
Permanent Facility Square Footage
Elementary
Middle School
Senior High/Other
Total 95.7%
Total Facilities Square Footage
Elementary
Middle School
Senior High/Other
Total
Developer Provided Sites / Facilities
Value
Dwelling Units
State Funding Assistance Gredit
District Funding Assistance Percentage
Construction Cost Allocation
CCA - CosUSq, Ft.
District Average Assessed Value
Single Family Residence
District Average Assessed Value
Multi-Family Residence
Bond Levy Tax Rate/$1,000
Current Rate / 1,000 Tax Rate
General Obligation Bond lnterest Rate
Current Bond lnterest Rate
CPI lnflation Factor
Per OSPI Website
125,204
10,256
21,296
156,756
1 621 688
660
1,223,349
3,505,941
1 746 892
671 160
1,244,645
3,662,697
53.79Yo
$238.22
$268,271
726
1.41
0.0014
0
2.44%
2.20%
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan
0
(APPENDTX A)May 2021
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION fOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
Site Acquisition Gost per Single Family Residence
Formula: ((Acres x Cost x Student
Student Factor
A 1 (Elementary)
A 2 (Middle School)
A 3 (Senior Hioh)
12
25
38
$1 00,328
$0
$0
0.27734
0.07076
0.08649
$440.50
$0.00
s0 00
758
0
456
Site CosuAcre
Total 75
Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence
Formula: ((Facility Cost /x Siudent
$1 00,328 1,214 0.435
A4 $440.50
X
Ratio
B 1 (Elementary)
B 2 (Middle School)
$55,000,000
$0
0.27734
0.07076
$'18,171 .62758
0
456
0.903
0.984
0.998B3
Total $91,000,000
Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence (Portables)
Formula: ((Facility Cost /x Student
C'1 (Elementary)
C 2 (Middle School)
24
29
31
0.097
0.016
0.02
H
1,214 0.435 $24,986.1 3
/ Total
$0
$0
o 27734
0.07076
0.08649
$0.00
$0.00
Student FactorFacilitv Cost Facilitv Capacity
Total $0 84
State Funding Assistance Credit per Single Family Residence (formerly "State Match")
0.435
Assistance 7o x Student Factor
Student Factor
0.27734
0.07076
0.08649
$0.00
$4,086.86
$1,342
Fomula: AreaCostAllowance x SPI Feet x
D 1 (Elementary)
D 2 (Middle School)
$238.22
$238.22
0.5379
0.5379
0.5379
115
148
173D3H 9't7
$7,346.10
Tax credit per Single Fami Residence
Developer Provided Facility Credit
(Below used to calculate NPV)
Current Bond lnterest Rate
Years Amortized (10 Years)- Used in NPV Calculation
2.44o/o
10
TC+
FC+000
$268,271
8.90
0.
SF Residential Assessed Value (AAV)
Net Present Value (per EO) (NPV)
urrent Debt Service Rate / 1 (
Facilitv / Site Value Units
Fee Recap **
A = SiteAcquisition perSF Residence
B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence
C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence
Subtotal
D = State Match Credit per Residence
TC = Tax Credit per Residence
Subtotal
$440.50
$24,986.1 3
$0 00
$7,346.1 0
$3,366.53
$25,426.63
712.63
Total Unfunded Need
500/o Developer Fee Obligation
FC = Facility Credit (if applicable)
District Adjustment
Net Fee Obligation per Residence - Single Family
$14,7'13.99
$7,357
$0
538.
$5,818.09
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDTX B)May 2021
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE
Site Acquisition Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit
Formula: ((Acres x Cosl x Student Generation
A 1 (Elementary)
A 2 (Middle School)
A 3 (Senior Hioh)
00,328$12
25
38
$0
$0
0.25784
0.05784
0.1 00
758
0
456
$409.53
$0.00
Total
Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit
Formula: ((Facility Cost i x Student X
Construction Cost Facilitv Capacity Student Factor Footaqe Ratio
758
0
456
0.25784
0.05784
0.903
0.984
0.998
$75 1 00,328 1,214 0.416A + ----l;oes3'
$ 16,893.96B 1 (Elementary)
B 2 (Middle School)
$55,000,000
$o
B3
Total $91,000,000
Temporary Facility Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit
Formula: ((Facilily Cost /
C 1 (Elementary)
C 2 (Middle School)
.95
$24,772.911,214
x Student
Facilitv Cost Facilitv Capacitv Student Factor Footaqe Ratio
x
0.416
0.25784
0.05784
$0.00
$o
$0
24
29
31
$0
$o
0.097
0.016
o.o2c3
Total $0 84
State Funding Assistance Gredit per Multi-Family Residence (formerly "State Match")
$0.00
Formula: Area CostAllowance x SPI Feet studenl x o/o x Sludent Factor
D l (Elementary)
D 2 (liliddle School)
D 3 (Senior High)
Tax Credit per Multi Residence
Developer Provided Facility Credit
0.5379
0.5379
o.25784
0.05784
0.1
$238.22
$238.22
115
148
173
$3,799.51
$1,097
7
$7,113.22
845.'18
(Below used to calculate NPV)
Current Bond lnterest Rate
Years Amortized (10 Years)- Used in NPV Calculation
2.44o/o
10
TC+
FC+00 0
MF Residential Assessed Value (AAV)$226,726
8.90
0.14o/o
Net Presenl Value (per Ea) (NPV)
rrent Debt Service Rate / 1
/ Site Value Dwelli Units
Fee Recap **
A = Site Acqulsilion per Multi-Family Unit
B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit
C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit
D = State Match Credit per MF Unit
TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit
$409.53
$24,772.91
$0.00
Subtotal
$7,113.22
$2,845.18
$25,182.44
$9,958.40Subtotal
Total Unfunded Need
50% Developer Fee Obligation
FC = Facility Credit (if applicable)
District Adjustment
Net Fee Obligation per Residential Unit - Multi-family
$15,224.04
$7,612
0
53
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDTX C)May 2021
lX - Summary of Changes to June 2O2O Capital Facilities Plan
The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect
since L993. The primary changes from the June 2020 Plan are summarized here.
Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in class size ratio as well as program
changes. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect use, lease or purchase, sale,
surplus and/or movement between facilities.
The district worked with contractor Educational Data Solutions, LLC out of Seattle Washington
to update student generation factors. The updated rates are included in the body of the Plan.
The student headcount enrollment forecast is updated annually. All Elementary schools now
have Full Day Kindergarten so six-year Kindergarten projections were previously modified to
meet the requirements for Full Day Kindergarten programs at all elementary schools.
The district expects to receive some State Funding Assistance (formerly called "state matching
funds") for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded site and
facility needs will be reviewed in the future.
The impact fees for 2O22 calendar year will change based on the percentage increase of the
consumer price index for the Seattle metropolitan area. The increase for 2Q22 calendar year
is 22% (Based on the OSPI Applied to LEA & Levy per pupil inflators CPI as of March 2O2L).
For single-family residences, the fee will increase bV 5L25.2a to 55818.06. The impact fee
for multi-family units will increase by 552.90 to 52,457.53.
16
X - Appendices
Changes to lmpact Fee Calculation Factors lnclude
ITEM Gradel
Tvpe
FROM TO lncrease/
Decrease
Comments
Student Generation Factor
Single Family (SF)
Elem
MS
SH
Total
0.334
0.078
O.II7
0.277
0.071
0.086
0.529 0.435 -0.094 Decrease
Student Generation Factor
Multi-Family (MF)
Elem
MS
SH
Total
0.r87
0.043
0.070
0,258
0.058
0.100
0.300 0.416 0.116 lncrease
State Funding Assistance Ratios ("State
Match")
Area Cost Allowance
Average Assessed Valuation (AV)
AV - Average of Condominiums &
Apts.
SF
56s6%
s22s.97
5423,247
s3.79%
5238.22
s268,271,
-3.17%
12.250
(1.s4,9761
Per OSPI Website
Per OSPI Website
Puget Sound ESD
MF 5!64,546 5226,726 62,180 Puget Sound ESD
Debt Service Capital Levy Rate / 51000 s1.41 Sf .+f 0.0 Per King Co. Assessor Report
General Obligation Bond lnterest Rate 2.16%2.44% O.28% Bond Buyers 20 year GO lndex
lmpact Fee - Single Family
lmpact Fee - Multi-Family
SF
MF
ss,692.8s
s2,403.63
s5,818.09
s2,457.53
s12s.24
Ss3.so
2.20%
2.20%
FEDERAL WAY
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Each Scholar: A voice. A dream. A BRIGIIT future.
Lake Grove Elementary School Mirror Lake Elementary School
Wildwood Elementary School Thomas Jefferson High School
Star Lake Elementary School Totem Middle School
CAPITAL FACI LITI ES PLAN
2022
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
2022
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
June29,202l
BOARD OF EDUCATION
Trudy Davis
HiroshiEto
Dr. Jennifer Jones
Geoffery McAnalloy
Luckisha Phillips
SUPERINTENDENT
Dr. Tammy Campbell
Prepared by: Sally D. Mclean, Chief Finance & Operations Officer
Jennifer Thomas, Student & Demographic Forecaster
FED ERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
SECTION I THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Introduction
Inventory of Educational Faci lities
Inventory of Non-lnstructional Facilities
Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities
Needs Forecast - New Facilities
Six Year Finance Plan
SECTION 2 MAPS
Introduction
Map - City and County Jurisdictions
SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
Introduction
Building Capacities
Portable Locations
Student Forecast
1
/.-J
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
ll
SECTION 4 KING COUNTY, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, AND
CITY OF KENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
lntroduction
Capacity Summaries
Impact Fee Calculations
Reference to Impact Fee Calculations
Student Generation Rates
Impact Fee Changes from 2021 to 2022
l2
t3-l5
t6-t7
l8-20
21
22-26
27-28
29-30
3l
JL
1
FE DERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
INTRODUCTION
In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB)
2g2g (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King
County Code 2l A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995
as amended, City of Kent Ordinance No.4278 effective June 201 8, revised January 2020, and
the City of Auburn OrdinanceNo.5078 effective 1998, Federal Way Public Schools has
updated its Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2021.
This plan is scheduled to be submitted for consideration to each of the jurisdictions located
with the Federal Way Public Schools' service area: King County, the City of Kent, City of
Federal Way and the City of Auburn and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each
jurisdiction by reference. This plan is requested to be included in the Facilities Plan element
of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not
adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The City of Des Moines collects school impact fees as
partof the SEPA process. The District has plans for beginning discussions with the City of
Milton to adopt an ordinance for school impact fees for parcels located within the Federal
Way School District's service area is in process.
The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within
which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted
and recommended to the King County Council for Urban Growth Area Line Maps with
designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planningatea,
which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County willencourage and
actively ruppott the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing, jobs,
services, .ultur", and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this
underlying assumption.
This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which
requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended
to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim
plans consistent with Board policies or management need.
During the 2016-17 school year the District formed a 100 member Facilities Planning
Committee consisting of parents, community members and staff. The Committee was tasked
with developing a recommendation to the Superintendent regarding Phase 2 of the District's
plan for school construction, remodelin g, andlor modernization for voter consideration in
November 2017. The voters passed this $450M bond authorization with a 62YoYES vote
reflecting a commitment to invest in the modernization of our infrastructure. Through the
committee's work a determination was made to rebuild Thomas Jefferson High School,
Illahee Middle School, Totem Middle School, Lake Grove Elementary, Mirror Lake
Elementary, Olympic View Elem entary, Star Lake Elementary, and Wildwood Elementary.
In addition to the school projects, the committee included a plan to modernize Memorial
Stadium, which currently supports athletic activities for all schools. The rebuilding of the
schools will create additional capacity for students at the elementary and high school levels.
2
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
INTRODU ON- continued
The District continues to monitor factors that may have an impact on enrollment and capacity
at our schools, including new single-family and multi-family residential developments and
any impacts due to the COVID-19 stay home order. In accordance with the McCleary
decision, the State has provided funding to reduce K-3 class size to 17 and 4-12 class size to
25. Beginning in 2019-20 the legislature expects compliance with this funding adding
p...ru.- to the need for elementary capacity. In response to this need the district has acquired
the former Devry building renovating it into 42 elementary classrooms to provide permanent
additional capacity.
3
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION 1 - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to
determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community.
This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and
expected future facitity requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. A Financial Plan that
shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization listed follows
this.
4
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILTTIES
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (K-5)
Adelaide
Brigadoon
Camelot
Enterprise
Green Gables
Lake Dolloff
Lake Grove
Lakeland
Mark Twain
Meredirh Hill
Mirror Lake
Nautilus (K-8)
Olympic View
Panther Lake
Rainier View
Sherwood Forest
Silver Lake
Star Lake
Sunnycrest
Twin Lakes
Valhalla
Wildwood
Woodmont (K-8)
1635 sw 304'h st
3601 sw 336th St
4o4l S 298'h st
35101 5'h Ave SW
32607 47'h Ave SW
4200 s 308th st
303 SW 308'h St
35827 32"d Ave S
2450 S Star Lake Rd
5830 S 300'h St
625 S 314'h St
1000 s 289'h St
2626 SW 327th St
34424 l't Ave S
3015 S 368th St
3460012'h Ave SW
l3 l0 sw 325'r' Pl
4014 s 270'h St
24629 42"d Ave S
4400 sw 320'h st
27847 42"d Ave S
2405 s 300'h st
2645416'r'Ave S
Federal Way
Federal Way
Auburn
Federal Way
Federal Way
Auburn
Federal Way
Auburn
FederalWay
Auburn
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
Kent
Kent
Federal Way
Auburn
Federal Way
Des Moines
98023
98023
98001
98023
98023
98001
98023
98001
98003
9800 I
98003
98003
98023
98003
98003
98023
98023
98032
98032
98023
9800 I
98003
98198
MIDDLE r,s (6-8)
Federal Way Public Academy (6-10)
Illahee
Kilo
Lakota
Sacajawea
Sequoyah
Totem
TAF @ Saghalie (6-12)
HIGH SCHOOLS (9-12)
Decatur
Federal Way
Thomas Jefferson
Todd Beamer
Career Academy at Truman
ADDITIONAL SCHOOLS
Internet Academy (K- I 2)
Employment Transition Program (12+)
Federal Way Open Doors
Former DeVry Property (K-5)
34620 9'h Ave S
36001 I't Ave S
44oo s 308'h st
1415 SW 314'h St
1l0l S Dash Point Rd
3450 S 360'h ST
26630 40th Ave S
3391419'r'Ave SW
2g00 sw 320th st
30611 l6th Ave S
4248 S 288th St
3599916tr'Ave S
31455 28'r'Ave S
31455 28'r' Ave S
33250 2l't Ave SW
31455 28th Ave S
3600 S 344thWay,
Federal Way
Federal Way
Auburn
Federal Way
Federal Way
Auburn
Kent
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
Auburn
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
98003
98003
9800 I
98023
98003
9800 r
98032
98023
98023
98003
9800 l
98003
98003
98003
98023
98003
9800 I
5
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CURRENT INVENTORY NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES
Developed Propertv
Central Kitchen
Federal Way Memorial Field
Educational Services Center
Support Services Center
75
65
60
IJ
7l
82
96
l2l4 s 332"d
1300 s 308th st
33330 8th Ave S
l211s332ndSt
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
FederalWay
98003
98003
98003
98003
Leased Property
Early Learning Center at Uptown 1066 S 320th St
Square
Federal Way 98003
Undeveloped Propertv
Site
#
Location
SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW - 9.2 Acres
S 35lst Street & 52nd Avenue S - 8.8 Acres
E of 1Oth Avenue SW - SW 334th & SW 335th Streets
N of SW 320t1' and east of 45th PL SW - 23.45 Acres
S 344th Street & 46th Avenue S - 17.47 Acres
l't Way S and S 342nd St- Minimal acreage
S 308th St and l4th Ave S - .36 Acres
- 10.04 Acres
Notes:
Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements.
Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in
the District.
6
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES
As part of the multi-phase modernization and replacement plan, the District intends to
increase capacity for elementary and high school students with expansion at the Thomas
Jefferson, Lake Grove, Mirror Lake, Olympic View, Star Lake, and Wildwood sites. Only
projects in Phase II with plans to increase capacity are included in the impact fee calculation
for this plan.
'7
PHASE EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF
FUNDS
As
needed
Purchase and Relocate
Portables
lnterim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is
Impact Fees.
II Thomas Jefferson High
School
Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
Voter Approved Capital bond
II Illahee Middle School Replace Existing Building Voter Approved Capital bond
II Totem Middle School Reolace Existins Buildine Voter Approved Capital bond
II Lake Grove Elementary Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
Voter Approved Capital bond
II Mark Twain Elementary Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
TBD, pending SCAP funding
II Mirror Lake Elementary Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
Voter Approved Capital bond
II Olympic View K-8 School Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
Voter Approved Capital bond
II Star Lake E,lementary Replace Existing Br"rilding,
Increase Capacity
Voter Approved Capital bond
II Wildwood Elementary Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
Voter Approved Capital bond
II Memorial Stadium Replace Existing Facility Voter Approved Capital bond
II DeVry Properfy Temp Swing School
Increase Capacity
SCAP and K-3 Class stze
reduction funding
III Decatur High School Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
TBD
III Kilo Middle School Replace Existing Building TBD
III Sacaiawea Middle School Replace Existing Building TBD
III Adelaide Elementary Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
TBD
III Brigadoon E,lementary Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
TBD
III Camelot Elementary Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
TBD
III Lake Dolloff Elementary Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
TBD
III Nautilus K-8 School Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
TBD
III Twin Lakes Elementary Replace Existing Building,
lncrease Capacity
TBD
III Woodmont K-8 School Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
TBD
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
NEEDS FORECAST - ADDITIONAL FACILITIES
NEW FACILITY LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS
No current plans for additional facilities.
B
Six Year Finance Plan
Secured Funding Soutces
ImFct Fecs (l:$ t.066.0 t6
Lmd Salc Funds (
Bond or Lcq Funds (
($597_82il
qt38 160768
KI-CSR & TAFAunchnncd cxp.nditurcs (4 $9.921.?30
School Construcuon Assislarcc PrcFm (SCAP) (5
TOTAI,
{$5.291.(tE I
s1i3t62.005
Projected Revenue
Actual and Planned Expenditures
2021 2022 2n26 2021NEW SCHOOLS
2021-22 2022-23 ao2s-2026 2026,2127 2n21'2[24
MODf,RNIATION AND EXPANSION
uimr Lalc Elemcnlaw (l l)sJl-190.00t
rcrr rL. Fl.m.nl,ru ll ll s28.920.00(sll 180.00(
ildwnod Fl.ncnlrN (l l)
sl6 362 0m $27.500.00r sJ6100.00t
ft.ma. I.m.Rdn Hirh S.i.ol ll ll sr t9.s3.m{s17.617.0m 317 617.00(s1J7.600.00t
Middle School {5 200 0m s30.900.00(s73-000-00f
sto2.txl s26902.00(
$(
SITE ACOUTST'TTUN
sl.{2,1.?5c st.+22.25C s29J10.25{
Tf,MPORARY FACILITIES
s200 0m $200.00({ro0 000 s200 00c $200.000 $t Joo 00(s l.{00.00t
sJ50.0E0.750 s26.723.00{l s201.15750(
NOTES:
I Thcsc fccs lre cutrcntty bcinB h€ld in a King Coutrly, ciry olFcdcral Way. Cily olAubum, dnd C'ly ofKcnl impacl fcc accounl, and Nill bc
availablcforusebylhcl)kricllorsy{cmimprovcnctrb thisisycarcnd Mhnccon IZlll20.
2 This is ycar cnd b.lancc otr l2ll l/20
lThisisdrcl2/ll/20balanccolbondfundsandcapilallcrytutds Thhfisurcincludcsirlcrcslc.minBs
4 This rcprcscnb lhc K3-CSR & Wi unclaimdcxPcndndrcs
5 This rcprcscnF lfrc balanccolSCAP londinS.
6 This is rhc balancc ofaulhoircd and anlicipalcd SCAI'fo. thc prcjccs aurhDri^d bv lhc vole6 in 2017
7 Thisisa sccurcd K-3 CIas sirc.cducton granl.
in school idFct lcc calculations
9 lherc are no projNted elc ofsurylus ProPdlics
to lhcsc drc prcjcclcd fccs bascd upon anticipilcd..sidcnrial delclopmcnb in thc l)isldct,S25,0m pcr monih ovcr the nexl 6 lcars
1cmpo6ryhoDsing lhcsccossarctcludcd fiomimPactfcccalculations
I 3 Thcsc fccs rcprcscnt rhc co$ of p!rchasi ng and i nil6l IinB ncw poddblcs. Thc potblc c{pcndilurc in lulur yc.rs may rplacc .tisliig podablcs lhal arc nol lunctional
Thcsc
'nay
not incrcascapacity lnd arc not inctudcd in lhccapacitv slnmary
9
$
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION 2 - MAPS
Federal Way Public Schools has twenty-one elementary schools (grades K-5), two schools
with a K-8 grade configuration, six middle school schools (grades 6-8), four high schools
(grades 9-12) and four small secondary schools. The Federal Way Public Academy serves
students in grades 6-10. The programs at Open Doors and Career Academy at Truman High
School serves students in grades 9-12. ln addition to these programs, TAF@Saghalie serves
students in grades 6- l2 who reside within the service area and the Employment and Transition
Program (ETP) at the Norman Center serves 18-21 yeat old scholars.
The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility
infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public
facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that
development. School districts are different. If the district does not have permanent facilities
available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries
can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities.
It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction
of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the
district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around
a single development.
Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the district and is not taken lightly. It
is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools.
Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school'
The final map included represents the city and county boundaries which overlap with the
district's service areas.
. City of Algona
. City of Auburn
. City of Des Moines
. City of Federal Way
. City of Kent
. City of Milton
. Unincorporated King County
10
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL F'ACILITIES PLAN
MAP _ CITY AND COUNTY JURISDICTIONS
fr FEDERAL WAY
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Erch Schslr.: A volce- A dresm. A iFIGHT future-
"+--'City and County
.lu risd ictionsfl0.5 I
Des
Auburn
Kent
1
Ft
I'-
Federal
Algona
Milton
2 Miles
11
FWPS boundaries is 100%o Urban Growth Area
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION 3 . SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
Building Capacities - The Education Program
Portable Locations
Student Forecast -2022 through 2028
1,2
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
BUILDING CAPACITIES
This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to
asceftain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction
establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into
consideration the education program needs.
In general, the District's current target class size provides that the average class size for a
standard classroom for grades K through 3 should be 17 students to comply with current
legislation. In grades 4-5 the target is 25 students. For grades 6 to 12 the target class size is 26
students. Classrooms for students with Individualized Education Program (Special Education)
needs are calculated at l2 seats per classroom.
Historically, the District has used the OSPI square footage calculation as a baseline for
capacity calculation and made adjustments for specific program needs. The District will
continue to use this calculation for determining capacity at our middle and high schools.
However, for elementary schools capacity will be calculated based on the number of
classroom spaces and the number of students assigned to each classroom.
Class Size
Guidelines
FWPS Historical
"Standard of Service'"
H8266tlSH82776
Enacted Law
Square Footage
Guideline
Kindergarten 18.9 t7 25-28
Grades I -2 18.9 t7 25-28
Grade 3 18.9 t7 28
Grades 4-5 25 25 28
For the purposes of determining student capacity at individual schools, the following list
clarifies adjustments to classroom spaces and the OSPI calculation.
Special Education Resource Rooms:
Each middle school requires the use of a standard classroom(s) for special education students
requiring instruction to address specific disabilities.
English as a Second Language Programs:
Each middle school and high school requires the use of a standard classroom for students
learning English as a second language.
Middle School Computer Labs:
Each middle school has computer labs, except Totem Middle School. Wireless access has
been installed at all secondary schools. If additional classroom space is needed, these
computer labs may be converted to mobile carts.
13
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
BUILDING CAPACITIES' continued
High School Career Development and Learning Center (Resource) Room:
Each high school provides special education resource room and career
development classrooms for students requiring instruction to address specific
disabilities.
Preschool/ECEAP/Headstart
Our district currently offers preschool programs at multiple locations across the
district. These programs decrease K-12 capacity. Early Childhood Education is
an expanding need.
Alternative Learning Experience:
Federal Way offers students the opportunity to participate in an Alternative
Learning Experience through our Internet Academy. These students have never
been included in the capacity calculation of unhoused students. Due to COVID l9
and school closures many families elected to enroll in IA. We believe this is a
temporary increase. This plan was prepared using historical IA data.
lA Headcount Elem MS HS Total
Nov-19 12 59 205 276
Nov-20 159 147 25CI 556
Temp lncrease 147 88 45 280
1418 Youth Reengagement:
Federal Way offers students the opportunity to participate in l4l8 Youth
Reengagement Open Doors program. These students are housed at the Truman
campus and have not been previously included in the capacity calculation of
unhoused students. However, we have prepared this plan including approximately
25Vo of Open Doors enrollment.
I4
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
BUILDING CAPACITIBS, continued
H.EIvIII'{TARY B UILDING
PROGRAMCAPACITY
MIDDLE SCHOOL BI.NLDING
PROGRAMCAPACITY
f tzt*Middle School Averase
HIGHSCHOOL BUILDING
PROGRAMCAPACITY
Flementarv Averase 403
Notes:
rPreschool enrollment reduces capacity for K-5 students. l5 preschool students in one classroom.
2Federal Way Public Academy, Career Acaclemy at Truman High School, and Employment Transition
Program ancl TAF @ Saghalie for the high school school grade span (9-12) are non-boundary schools
These schools are not used in the calculated averages.
'Luk. Grou. and Wildrvood opened January 202 l; Mirror Lake and TJHS are scheduled to open
September 202 I
School Name Headcount lPreschool
Adelaide 353 30
Brisadoon 299 30
Camelot 277 30
Enterprise 345 t5
Green Cnbles 40t
I-ake Dolloff 400
lLake Groue 600
I akeland 371
Mark Twain 430
Meredith Hill 375 30
sMiror take 600
Nautilus (K-8)466
Olympic View 353
Panther l,ake 347
Rainier Mew 405 30
Sherwood Forest 390 6
Silver lake 400
Star lake 337
Sunnvcrest 405
Twin lakes 341 30
Valhalla 406
3wildwood 600 30
Woodmont (K-8)357
TOTAL 9,258 231
SchoolNanre Headcount
Illahee 855
Kilo 779
Lakota 786
Sacaiawea 694
Sequoyah 585
Totem 795
TAF @ Saghalie s98
Federal Way Public Academy 183
TOTAL 5,275
School Name Headcount
Decatur 1243
Federal Way 1684
Thomas Jefferson 1224
Todd Beamer 1085
TAF @ Saehalie 155
Truman Campus (Career Academy and Open Doors)r59
Federal Way Public Academy il6
Employmenl Transil ion Program 48
TOTAL 5-714
lJ09h School
15
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
PORTABLE LOCATIONS
The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education.
It is not an efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students
due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from
year to year.
Portables are used as interim measures to house students when increasing population impacts
a school attendance area. Portables may also be required to house students when new or
changing programs require additional capacity. They also provide housing for students until
permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. When permanent facilities become
available, the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or child care
programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables may not be
fit to move due to age or physicat condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy
new portables and surplus these unfit portables.
With the launch of construction of new schools, a number of portables will be relocated,
decommissioned, or sold.
The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for
educationalfacilities by Federal Way Public Schools'
I6
INSTRUCTIONAL
NON
INSTRUCTIONAL'
Adelaide 2 1
Brigadoon 1
Camelot 1
Enterprise 3
Green Gables I
Lake Dolloff 5
Lake Grove
Lakeland
Mark Twain 3
Meredith Hill 3
Min'or Lake
Nautilus 5
Olympic View 2
Panther Lake 4
Rainier View 5
Sherwood Forest 4
Silver Lake 4
Star l.ake
Sunnycrest 6
Twin Lakes 3
Valhalla 4
Wildwood
Woodmont 3
TOTAL 50 It
PORTABLES LOCATED
AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
PORTABLES LOCATED
AT MIDDLE SCHOOLS
PORTABLE LOCATIONS
PORTABLES LOCATED
AT HIGH SCHOOLS
INSTRUCTIONAL
NON
TNSTRUCTIONAL
Decatur 8 I
Federal Way
Thomas Jefferson
Todd Beamer 8
l()tAL l6 I
PORTABLES LOCATED
AT ST]PPORT FACILITIES
MOT
IDC 9
Former'l AIA
TOTAL 9
DISTRICT PORTABLES IN USE FOR ECEAP
AND/OR HEADSTART
Sherwood Forest 2
Totem
I otal a
INSTRUCTIONAL
NON
INSTRUCTIONAL
tllahee 2 1
Kilo 1 6
Lakota
Sacaiawea 5
Sequoyah ,,
Totem
TAF@ Sashalie 4
TOTAL t4 7
I1
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
STUDENT FORECAST
Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment
projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The
majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students.
Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected
enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to
enrollment proj ections.
Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department.
Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals, grade level
and program level to include vocational and special education students.
The basis of projections has been cohort survivalanalysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of
a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a
stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical
information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not
trace individual students; it is concemed with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The
district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study
several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student
migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades
(kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on
birth rates within the district's census tracts and treats these statistics as a cohort for
kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years.
The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student
enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below.
The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are
forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years
of historical information and how they are weighted.
A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows
the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections
for the district level. The Enrollment MasterrM software provides statistical methods
including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods.
This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment.
In February 2018, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the
Federal Way School District. The report was complete in March 2018. The model used to
forecast next year's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth,
assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county-wide average),
assumes groMh from new housing or losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast
was provided as a range of three projections. The long-range forecast provided with this
report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes
in the 5- l9 age group for King County.
1B
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
STUDENT FORECAST, continued
Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a
constant percent of something else (e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some
projected trend for the school-age population over time. The report included 5 different
calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2026. This
model produces a projection that is between 21,500 and 25,000 when applied to the low,
medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning
and is consistent with estimates from various models.
Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort
survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the
projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied
annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they
project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by
Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the
projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington.
Near term projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by current
local economic conditions. The District tracks new development from five permitting
jurisdictions. Long range planning assumes a student yield from proposed new housing
consistent with historical growth patterns.
Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The
Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions
comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school
district community in the future.
Federal Way like many districts experienced a decline in enrollment particularly atthe early
elementary grades due to COVID-19. We anticipate our student forecast about a 50oh
recovery in the comin gyear. The balance of the forecast is based on previous groMh
indicators.
I9
Calendar Yr
October I Head Count Enrollment History and Projections
School Year Middle School School Total K -12
20t6
20t7
201 8
2019
2020
202r
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2015-16
2016-1'7
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
202A-21
82021-22
P2022-23
P2023-24
P2024-25
P202s-26
P2026-27
P2027-28
t0,206
10,424
10,418
10,233
10,046
9,324
9,450
9,507
9,602
9,679
9,756
9,873
9,952
Elementary K-5
5,094
5,033
5,159
5,t24
5,413
5,173
5,191
5,222
5,274
5,317
5,359
s,423
5,467
Middle School GB
6,695
6,476
6,338
6,386
5,836
5,786
6,197
6,234
6,297
6,347
6,398
6,474
6,526
High School 9-12
21,995
2t,933
21,9r5
2t,743
21,295
20,283
20,838
20,963
21,173
21,342
2l,513
21,771
21,945
1%
1%
0%
,o/
0.6%
1.0%
0.8%
0.8%
L2%
0.8%
Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast
22,500
22,000
21,500
21,000
20,500
20,000
19.500
19,000
18,500
18.000
Br,
>o
t,
>J
v"%,o %
B
g_vI
d-
"9t'
g
'ai,-
b
ug bu u\ uB, u*,
6
School Year
20
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION 4 _ KING COUNTY. CITY OF FEDEITAL WAY. AND CITY OF KENT
IMPACT FEE I,CIII,ATIONS
Capacity Summaries
Site & Construction Costs Allocations
Student Generation Rates
Impact Fee Calculations
Reference to Impact Fee Calculations
2L
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACITY SUMMARIES
All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and High Schools
The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information, Portable Capacity
information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements
for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary
facilities or interim measures.
The District has recently adjusted its capacity calculation method for Elementary schools to
better show capacity needed to comply with the K-3 Class Size Reduction. This adjustment is
also shown in the portable capacity calculation. In order to allow for flexibility in portable
usage the District will use an average class size calculation of 2l for each Elementary portable
and an average class size of 25 for each Middle and High School portable.
The information is organized with a page summ arizingthe entire District, and then evaluating
capacity vs. number of students at elementary, middle school, and high school levels
individually.
The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in
place each year.
22
CAPACITY SUMMARY - ALL GRADES
CAPACITY
ENROLLMENT
Budget -- Proiected--
Calendar Year 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028
School Year 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
BUILDING PROGRAM
HEADCOI.NNT CAPACITY
Add Capacity
20,005
237
20,242
138
20,380
612
20,992
0
20,992
0
20,992
0
20,992
0
Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 20,242 20,380 20,992 20,992 20,992 20,992 20,992
Basic Headcount Enrollment
Internet Academy Headcount Enrollmentl
Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy
20,838
(255)
20,583
20,963
(2ss)
20,708
21,173
(2ss\
20,918
21,342
(2ss)
2t,087
21,513
(2ss)
21,258
21,771
(2ss)
21,516
21,945
(2ss)
21,690
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM FTE CAPACITY (341)(328)74 (es)(266)(s24)(6e8)
RELOCATABLE CAPACITY
Current Portable Capacity
Add/Subtract Portable Capacity
2,050
(2s0)
l,800
I,800
0
1,800
I,800
(42)
I,758
I,758
(s0)
I,708
t,708
0
1,708
1,708
0
I,708
I,708
0
1,708Adiusted Portable Capacity
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE
CAPACITY 1,459 1,472 1,832 1,613 10442 1,184 1,010
,/. -1
CAPACITY SUMMARY - ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
CAPACITY
ENROLLMENT
Budget -- Proiected--
Calendar Year 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028
School Year 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
BUILDING PROGRAM
HEAD COUNT CAPACITY
Add/Subtract capacity total
Add capacity atr:
Star Lake
De Vry
Olympic View K-8
9,016
0
9,016
138
138
9,154
612
612
0
9,766
0
9,766
0
9,766
0
9,766
0
Adiusted Program Headcount Capacity 9,0r6 9"154 9,766 9,766 9,766 9,766 9,766
Basic Headcount Enrollment
Internet Academy Headcount2
Basic Headcount Enrollment without Internet Academy
9,4s0
(20)
9,430
9,507
(20)
9,487
9,602
(20)
9,s82
9,679
(20)
9,659
9,756
(20)
9,736
9,873
(20)
9,853
9,952
(20)
q q]?
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM CAPACITY (414)(333)184 t07 30 (87)(r66)
RELOCATABLE CAPACITYT
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE
CAPACITY 636 717 1,192 I,l l5 1,038 921 842
NOTES:
I Capacity increases are projected based on a design to accommodate 525 students. Increased capacity is currently stated as the dilference
between current calculated capacity and the projected design. In order to reduce elementary class size, Devry capacity is calculated at 17
scholars per classroom.
2
Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use ofschool facilities. This represents historic enrollment.
3 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house
students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only based on class size capacity of 2 I . The actual number of
portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs.
Current Portable Capacity
Add/Subtract portable capacity
Add portable capacity at:
Subtract portable capacity at
Lake Grove
Mirror Lake
Star Lake
Iilildwood
Olympic View K-8
I,050
0
r,050
0
r,050
(42)
(t21
I,008
0
1,008
0
l,008
0
1,008
0
Adiusted Portable Capacity r,050 1,050 1,008 I,008 1,008 I,008 I,008
24
CAPACITY SUMMARY. MIDDLE SCHOOLS
CAPACITY
ENROLLMENT
Budget -- Pro.iected--
Calendar Year 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028
School Year 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
BUILDING PROGRAM
HEADCOUNT CAPACITY
Add/Subtract capacity
Add capacity at:
I olem
Illahee
\ )7\
0
5,275
0
\ )7\
0
\ )7\
0
\ )1\
0
5,275
0
5 )75
0
5,27 5 5,275 \ )1\\ )7\\ )7\\ )7\5,275Adiusted Program Headcount Capacity
Basic Headcount Enrollment
Internet Academy2
Basic Enrollment without Internet Academy
5,191
(5s)
5,136
<'r))
(55)
s,t67
5,274
(s5)
s,219
5,317
(55)
5,262
5,359
(55)
5,304
5,423
(55 )
5,368
5,467
(ss)
5,412
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM CAPACITY 139 108 50 13 (2e)(e3)(r37)
RELOCATABLE CAPACITY3
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE
CAPACITY 489 4s8 406 313 271 207 163
NOTES:
I Totem and Illahee Middle Schools currently have capacity for 800 & 850 students respectively, so no new capacity is anticipated
with the rebuild of these older buildings.
2 Intemet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. This represents historic
enrollment.
3 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to
temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only based on class size capacity of 25
The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs.
Current Portable Capacity
Add/Subtract portable capacity
Totem Middle School
Sacaj aw ea Middle School
Illahee Middle School
Adiusted Portable Capacity
350
0
350
0
350
0
350
(s0)
300
0
300
0
300
0
350 350 3s0
(50)
300 300 300 300
25
CAPACITY SUMMARY - HIGH SCHOOLS
CAPACITY
ENROLLMENT
Budget -- Projected--
Calendar Year 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028
School Year 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
BUILDING PROGRAM
HEADCOUNT CAPACITY
Add/Subtract capacity
Thomas Jefferson High School a
5,714
231
5,95 I
0
5,951
0
5,951
0
5,951
0
5,95 I
0
5,951
0
237
5,951 5,951 5,95 I 5,95 I 5,951 5,951 5,95 IAdiusted Program Headcount Capacity
Basic Headcount Enrollment
Intemet Academyr
Basic Ed without Internet Academy
6,197
(r80)
6,017
6,234
(r80)
6,0s4
6,297
(r80)
6,n7
6,347
(r80)
6,167
6,398
(r80)
6,218
6,474
(r80)
6,294
6,526
(r80)
6,346
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM CAPACITY (66)(103)(r 66)(216)(267)(343)(3es)
RELOCATABLE CAPACITY2
Current Portab le Capacity
Add/Subtract portable capacity
Thomas Jefferson High Schoota
Adiusted Portable Capacity
650
(2s0)
400
0
400
0
400
0
400
0
400
0
400
0
(2s0)
400 400 400 400 400 400 400
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE
CAPACITY3 334 297 234 184 133 5/5
NOTES:
1 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. This represents historic
enrollment.
2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to
temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only based on class size capacity of 25.
The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs.
3 Capacity for unhoused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and no planning time in some classrooms.
26
STUDENT GENERATION
Single Family Student Generation
Number of Number of Num ter of Number of Elementary Middle School Hiqh School Total
ramilv Elementaru Middle School chool Student Student Student Student
DEVELOPMENT Stut !nts Students Students Faclor Factor Factor Faclor
19-Pacific Heiohts 63 3 0 0.0476 0 0000 0.0000 o.o476
g-HaveMood Park 4 'l 0.0635 0.0159 00317 0.0986
18-Rekeat Meadows 56 I 11 o.'t270 o.'t429 0.1746 o 5000
18-Wvncrest ll 4'l 6 1 0.0952 0.0000 0.0'159 o.1707
18-Soundviil Manor 2'l 0 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
17-Eaqle Manor 12 4 1 0.0635 0.0317 0.0159 0.5833
17-Lakehaven Estates 13 0 1 0 0.0000 0,0159 0.0000 0.0769
17-Hibbford Glm 4 6 0.0635 0.0952 o 0635 0.9333
l7-Msta Pointe 105 26 4 5 o.4127 o 0635 0.0794 0.3333
Total 397 55 23 24
Student Generation'0.1385 0.0579 0.0505 0.2569
Multi-Family Student Generation - City of Fedeml Way
Number of Number of Number of Number of Elementaru Middle School Hiqh School Total
Multi Familv Elementary Hiqh School s1 udenl Student Student Student
DEVELOPMENT Dwellinqs Students Students Factor Factor Factor Factor
1-Watemark 135 18 7 5 1333 0.0519 0.0370 o.2222
17-Uptovrn Square 308 't22 89 0.396'1 o 2435 0.2890 0.9286
'17-Kitts Corner z',t6 154 79 60 0.7130 0.3657 o 2774 1 .3565
Total 659 294 161 154
Student Generation*0.4461 0.2443 o.2337 o.9241
* Sludent Generdtion rate is based on totals.
21
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
Single and Multi-Family Residences
Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to
help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities.
To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was
established. This formula can be found in King County Code 2lA and was substantially
adopted by the City of Auburn, Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to
establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to
a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard
construction costs, which are unique to that district.
Impact Fee Calculation
On page 30, the 2021 variables for the calculation of the Impact Fee for single family and
multi-family units based on King County Code 2lA and the Growth Management Act,
generate the results below:
Plan Year 2021 PlanYear 2022
Single Family Units
Multi-Family Units
Mixed-Use Residential'
$3,243
$ 16,003
$s 001
$ I ,845
$ 15,073
$7,536
Impact Fee Calculation - King County Code 2lA
The Impact Fees have changed as a result of changes in several factors. The updates made to
the variables in the Impact Fee calculation, generate a change in the lmpact Fee between
the 2021 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2022 Capital Facilities Plan. A summary of these
changes can be found on page 32 and a year over year comparison of formula variables can
be found on page 33.
I In accordance with the City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249
2B
2022IMPACT FEE
School Site Acquisition Cost:
Facility
Elementary
Middle School
High School
School Construction Cost:
o/oPermFac.l
Total Ft
Elementary
Middle School
High School
Temporary Facility Cost:
YoTemP Fac.
Cost /
Acre
Facility
Cost
Facility
Cost
Facility
Facility
Student
Factor
SFR
Student
Factor
SFR
Student
Factor
SFR
Student
Factor
SFR
Student
Factor
MFR
Student
Factor
MFR
TOTAL
TOTAL
Cost/
SFR
CosV
SFR
CosV
SFR
Cost/
SFR
SFR
Mixed-Use
Residential'
Cost/
MFR
Cost/
MFR
Cost/
MFR
Cost/
MFR
MFR
Facility
Total Ft
Elementary
Middle School
High School
School Construction Assistance Program Credit Calculation
Construction Cost Sq. Ft. State
Ft Student Match
Elementary
Middle School
High School
Tax Payment Credit Calculation
Average Assessed Value (April 2020)
Capital Bond Interest Rate (February 2021)
Net Present Value of Average Dwelling
Years Amortized
Property Tax Levy Rate
Present Value of Revenue Stream
Mitigation Fee Summary
Site Acquisition Cost
Permanent Facility Cost
Temporary Facility Cost
State Match Credit
Tax Payment Credit
Sub-Total
507o Local Share
rln accordance with the City of Federal Way Ordinance No, 95-249
2In accordance with the City of Kent Ordinance No. 4278, rev lll20
CFP 2022 - Working Excel Documents.xlsx 29
TOTAL
Student
Factor
MFR
Student
Factor
MFR
Total
Single Family Multi-Family
Residences Residences
$
$
$
s
$
914
12,073
(3,
$
$
$
$
$
2,942
41,351
76)(l 1,020)
3- I 28)
s
$
s
$
$
2,942
4 1,35 1
(6.2
(l 1,020)
(3.128)
$
$
3,690 $
1,845 s
30,145 $
15,073 $
30,145
15,073
lt.97 $384,077 697 0. I 385 0.4461 $914 s2,942
0.0579 0.2443 $0 s0
0.0605 0.2337 $0 $0
$914 $2,942
95.40%s44,267,t28 709 0.1 385 0.4461 $8.250 s26,57t
97.25o/o 0.0579 0.2443 $0 $0
98.79o/o $15,171,887 237 0.0605 0.2337 $3,823 $14,780
$12,073 $41,351
4.60%l 0.1 385 0.4461 $0 s0
2.75%l 0.0579 0.2443 $0 $0
t.zt%l 0.0605 0.2337 $0 $0
$0 $0
s238.22 90 65.59Y"0. I 385 0.4461 $ 1,948 $6,273
$238.22 0.0579 0.2443 $0 $0
s238.22 130 65.59Yo 0.0605 0.2337 sl,228 s4,747
$3,176 $l l,020
$378,9 I 0 $ l 93,630
2.44%2.44Yo
$3,326,55 I $1,699,92s
l0 l0
$l.84 $ 1.84
$6,121 $3.128
$lated Fee $7$1
of Kent $$
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Consistent with the capacity calculations described earlier, the District uses the OSPI square
footage calculation for determining capacity at our secondary schools. Based on this
methodology, the following construction costs for Thomas Jefferson High School are
allocated as the proportionate share:
REFERENCES TO IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS, continued
Square Footage Capacity at approx. l3l sq. ft.
Current: 179,l19 1378
Planned:210,000 I 600
Increased Capacity 237
lncrease as o/o t6.ll%
GMP s94,176,828
Proportionate Share $15,171,887
The District will use the above formulas created as a base for future Capital Facilities Plans
during the life of the current bond authorization. The capacity of these schools may vary
from year to year as programs are added or changed and construction cost may increase over
time.
FACILITIES CAPACITY
Permanent Facility CapacitY:
Changes to the Building Program Capacities calculation are found on page 15.
Capacity Summaries:
The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the
capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current
buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found
on pages 22-26.
Student Generation Factor Analysis:
Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined
separately for single-family units and multi-family units. The factors used in
the 2021 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors
from single-family units and multi-family units that were constructed in the
District in the last five (5) years and can be found on the next page
Temporary Facility Cost:
The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or
new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on pages l6 and
t7.
30
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
REFERENCES TO IMPACT FEB CALCULATIONS
SCHOOL ACOUISITION COST
The district purchased the former Devry Technical School building to house displaced
scholars during school construction then will provide permanent capacity for Early
Childhood Education programs.
SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COST
With voter approv al of the $450,000,000 bond package, design work is underway for six of
the approved projects.Anticipated construction budgets (based on the Guaranteed
Maximum Price or GMP)have been updated to reflect the final construction contracts' p lus
amendments. In addition, a credit for the cost of new construction is incorporated to
recognize the K-3 Class Size Reduction Grant obtained by Federal Way Public Schools.
The iollowing table outlines the facility cost included in the irnpact fee calculation:
Two additional projects are within this horizon, but not yet included - Olympic View K-8
and Mark Twain Elementary. These costs will be incorporated into future Capital Facilities
Plans. Current Middle School capacity calculations do not reflect unhoused students, so no
costs associated with Illahee Middle School or Totem Middle School are included.
Elementary
Schools
Lake
Grove
Mirror
Lake Star Lake Wildwood
Blementary
TOTAL
Permanent
Capacity 353 404 387 472 1616
New Capacity 600 600 525 600 2325
Increased
Capacity as %o
43.9%
GMP $31.475.730 $33,007,391 $30.163.1 I I $32,609,529 $127.2ss.76t
Proportionate
Share
$ 55,865,279
K-3 Class Size
Credit
($ I t,598,151)
Net
Proportionate
Share
s 44,267,128
31
Changes from2O27-22
Item
Percent of Permanent Facilities
Percent Temporary Facilities
Average Cost of Portable
Classrooms
Average Assessed Value
From/To
96.llYoto 95.86Y"
3.89%lo 4.24o/o
SFR- $383,189 to $378,910
MFR- $156,304 to $193'630
SFR- $3,243 to $1'845
MFR - $16,003 to $15,073
SFR- $3,243 to $1'845
MFR - $9,193 to $9'450
$189,941 to $169,579 Updated 5-yr rolling average of
portables purchased and placed
by 2016.
Comment
Report #3 OSPI
Updated portable inventory
Per King County Assessor's Office
SFR: Single-family residences and Mobile Homes
MFR: Apartments and Condos
Updated Housing Inventory
N ote : Student ge ne ration factors for our s ingle
family units are based on new developments
constructed within the District over the last five
(5) years prior to the date ofthefee calculalion.
S tude nt ge ne r a t i o n fa c to r s for ar e mu I t i -fa m i ly
units are based on new developments
constructedwithin the District over the last.five
(5) years prior to the date ofthe fee calculation'
SFR based on the updated calculation
MFR based on the updated calculation
SFR based on the updated calculation
MFR maximum per City of Kent
Ordinance No. 4278, rev lll20
Construction Cost Allocation 5238.22 to 5238.22 Change effective luly 2020
State Match 64.71%to 65.59Y" Change effective July 2020
Capital Bond Interest Rate
Property Tax Levy Rate
Student Generation Factors
Single-Family
Elementary
Middle School
High School
Multi-Family
2.44Yoto 2.44o/o Market Rate
$1.86 to $1.84 King County Treasury Division
.1809 to.1385
.0691 to.0579
.0987 to .0605
Elementary .5064 to ,3946
Middle School .2523 to.216l
High School .2523 to .2067
Impact Fee
City of Kent
5Z
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FAGILITI ES PLAN
2021 through 2027
"{*h
Adopted by the Auburn School
District Board of Directors
June 14,2021
SCHOOL DISTRICT
ENGAGE . EDUCATE . EMPOWER
SCHOOL DISTRICT
ENGAGE . EDUCATE . EMPO\N ER
915 Fourth Street NE
Auburn, Washington 98002
(253) 931-4900
Serving Students in:
Unincorporated King CountY
City of Auburn
City of Algona
City of Kent
City of Pacific
City of Black Diamond
BOARD of DIRECTORS
Tracy Arnold
Laurie Bishop
Arlista Holman
Sheilia Mclaughlin
Laura Theimer
Dr. Alan Spicciati, Superintendent
Table of Contents
Section I Executive Summary
Section ll Enrollment Projections and Student Generation Factors
Section lll Standard of Service
Section lV lnventory of Facilities
Section V Pupil Capacity
Section Vl Capital Construction Plan
Section Vll lmpact Fees
Page 1
Page 7
Page 18
Page 26
Page 30
Page 33
Page 37
Aubum Se-ho,ol Distrlet No. q08
Capital Facilities PIan
2021thrangh2027
Section t
Exeoutive Summary
Auburn School District No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2021 through 2027
l. Executive Summary
This six-year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Auburn
School District (the "District") as the District's principal planning document, in compliance
with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and the adopted
ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This Plan was prepared
using data available in the spring of 2021.
This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capitalfacilities plans adopted by the District.
However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District's needs. The
District may prepare interim and periodic long-range Capital Facilities Plans consistent
with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period;
other factors and trends in the use of facilities; and other needs of the District as may be
required. However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this six-year Capital
Facilities Plan.
To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and
within the Cities of Auburn, Black Diamond and Kent; the King County Council, the City
of Auburn, the City of Black Diamond, and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by
reference as part of each jurisdiction's respective comprehensive plan. To enable the
collection of impact fees in the Cities of Algona and Pacific, these municipalities must
also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act and the local ordinances,
this Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s)
adjusted accordingly.
The Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's
current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public lnstruction
establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for
the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school
impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the
District's specific needs. ln general, the District's current standard provides that class
size for grades K-3 should not exceed 17 students and class size for grades 4-5 should
not exceed 27 students. When averaged over the six elementary school grades, this
computes to 20.33 students per classroom. Class size for grade 6 should not exceed 27
students and class size for grades 7 and 8 should not exceed 28.53 students. When
averaged over the three middle school grades, this computes to 28.02 students per
classroom. Class size for 9-12 should not exceed 28.74 students, with some subject
areas restricted to lesser numbers. Decisions by current legislative actions may create
the need for additional classrooms. (See Section lll for more specific information.)
The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service
and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The District's
2
2O2O-2l capacity was 17,082. The actual number of individual students was 16,702 as
of October 1, 2020. (See Section V for more specific information.)
The Capital Construction Plan shown in Section Vl addresses the additions and
proposed modernization to the District's existing facilities. The plan includes the ongoing
replacement of five elementary schools and one middle school, construction of two new
elementary schools, and acquisition of future school sites to accommodate growth. The
new facilities are required to meet the projected elementary school class size reductions
mandated by the State of Washington and student population increases generated by
the large development areas within the Auburn School District. Three areas that have
significant impact on the school district are the Lakeland South, Lea Hill, and the valley
areas of the district. There are also other development pockets that impact the District.
The District completed a comprehensive review of all district facilities in October 2008.
A Steering Committee made recommendations to the Board for capital improvements to
existing facilities and replacement of seven schools over the next ten years. These
recommendations led to a capital improvements levy and a bond issue that was placed
on the ballot in March 2009. Both ballot measures were unsuccessful in March. The
Board determined to rerun only the capital improvements levy in November 2009, which
the voters approved.
ln the fall of 2011, the Board determined to move forward with the Auburn High School
Modernization and Reconstruction Project and placed the project before the voters in
February of 2012. The bond issue was supported by the community at nearly 57o/o
approval rate, but was short of the super majority requirement of 60%. ln March of
2012, the Board determined to rerun the bond in November of 2012. ln November 2012,
the bond passed at62%. The project was completed during the summer of 2016.
ln the spring of 2016, the Board determined to move fonryard with the replacement of six
schools and the construction of two new elementary schools. The project was placed
before the voters in November 2016 and the bond passed at62.83%. The first of the
projects, the replacement of Olympic Middle School, started construction in May 2018
and opened in Fall 2019. The district's new elementary, Bowman Creek Elementary,
started construction in May 2019 and opened in August 202O.Construction for
replacement of Dick Scobee Elementary School started in June 2019 and the school
opened in August 2020. Construction of new Elementary School #16 and construction
of the replacement Pioneer Elementary School started May 2020. Both are scheduled to
open in the Fall of 2021. Construction for the replacement of both Lea Hill Elementary
School and Chinook Elementary School started in June 2021.
The School lmpact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn, City of
Black Diamond and City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in
meeting some of the fiscal impacts incurred by a district experiencing growth and
development. Section Vll sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family
and multi-family dwelling units. The student generation factors have been developed
using the students who actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single
family and multi-family developments constructed in the last five years. There have
beendramatic changes in the student generation factors for single and multi-family in
the past five years. The District plans to carefully monitor the numbers over the next
several years to determine if this is a trend or an anomaly. The method of collecting the
data is with the use of GIS mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County
3
GlS, data from Davis Demographics and integration of the mapping with student data
from the District's student data system. This method gives the District actual student
generation numbers for each grade span for identified developments. This data is
contained in Appendix A.3.
For purposes of this 2021 update, the District is choosing to continue to use the 2O2O
Student Generation Factor data given that remote learning and COVID-related
enrollment disruption likely presents an inaccurate data set of the students generated
from recent new development. The District will obtain updated data to calculate Student
Generation Factors for the 2022 update to this Plan.
4
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2021 lhrough2027
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2O2O Capital Facilities Plan that
are a part of the 2021 Plan. The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference.
Section I
Executive Summary
A. Updated to reflect new information within the Plan.
B. Summary level list of changes from previous year'
Section ll
Enrollment ProjectionsA. Updated projections. See Section ll & Appendices A.1
Section lll
Standard of ServiceA. Updated to reflect current number of classrooms allocated to non-standard classroom uses.
Section lV
lnventory of FacilitiesA. Add 2 portables at Mt. Baker Middle School
B. Add 3 portables at Cascade Middle School.
C. Add 4 portables at Olympic Middle School.
D. Add 2 portables at Rainier Middle School.
E. Add 2 portables at Auburn High School.
F. Add 2 portables at Auburn Mountainveiw High School'
G. Add 2 portables at Auburn Riverside High School.
H. Remove 13 portables from Lea Hill Elementary School.*
l. Remove 6 portables from Chinook Elementary School.**
J. Remove 1 portable from Gildo Rey Elementary School.
K. Remove 1 portable from Terminal Park Elementary School.
"Note: Two portable classrooms at Lea Hill Elementary School will move to JPt Admininstration Bldq.
**Not,e: Two portable classrooms at Chinook Elementarv Schoolwill be demolished.
Section V
Pupil Capacity
The 19 portables to be relocated in July 2021 are needed to accommodate enrollment increases.
5
lmpact Fees
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2021 lhtough2027
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2020 to 2021
DATA ELEMENTS
CPF
2020
CPF
2021 EXPLANATION
Student Generation Factors
Single Family
Elementary
Middle School
Sr. High
Multi-Family
Elementary
Middle School
Sr. High
School Construction Costs
Elementary
Middle
Site Acquisition Costs
Cost per acre
Area Cost Allowance Boeckh lndex
Match % - State
Match % - District
District Average AV
Single Family
Multi-Family
Debt Serv Tax Rate
GO Bond lnt Rate
$374,661
$160,501
0.2500
0.1 31 0
0.1520
0.4330
0.1 850
0.1 750
$60,200,000
$404,377
$225.97
66.32%
33.68%
$2.41
2.44o/o
$402,640
$197,141
0.2500
0.1310
0.1520
0.4330
0.1 850
0.1750
$112,000,000
$444,771
$238.22
62.87%
37.13%
$2.31
2.44o/o
Consistent with King County Ordinance 11621,
Student Generation Factors are calculated
by the school district based on district
records of average actual student generation
rates for new developments constructed
over the last five years.
For the purposes of this 2021 update, the
District is choosing to continue to use the
2020 Student Generation Factor data given
that remote learning and COVID-related
enrollment disruption likely presents an
inaccurate data set of the students generated
from recent new development. The District
willobtain updated data to calculate Student
Generation Factors for the 2022 update to
this Plan.
From new school construction cost estimate in
April2021.
Updated estimate based on 10% annual inflation.
Updated to current OSPI schedule. (July 2020)
Updated to current OSPI schedule (May 2020)
Computed
Updated from March 2021 King County
Dept of Assessments data.
Updated from March 2021King County
Dept of Assessments data using average
AV for apartments and condominiums.
Current FiscalYear
Current Rate (Bond Buyers 20 lndex 3-14)
6
Au,burn ;S.ohool District hls, 4oa
Sapitai Faeilities PIan
2021throughll27
$eetion ll
Enrsllment F=ieetions
and
Student Generation Factors
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2021 through2027
Student Enrollment Projections
Projection techniques give consideration to historical and current data as a basis for forecasting
the future. ln addition, certain assumptions must be made about the variables in the data being
used. Forecasting can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the
future or from the known to the unknown.
The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, psychological,
economic, and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection. An
example of this is with the COVID-19 pandemic. The logic embraces the assumptions that
whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today and will be in the
future. lt further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over time.
The basis of enrollment projections in the Auburn School District has been cohort survival
analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group of students in a grade level as it progresses
through time. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the
averages fonrvard. lf all students in one grade level progress to the next, the cohort number
would be 1.00. lf fewer students from the group progress the number will be less than 1. The
district has used this method with varying years of history (3 years, 6 years, 10 years and 13
years) as well as weighted factors to study several projections.
The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the
fact. This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the
assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections. Monitoring deviation is critical
to the viability and creditably of the projections derived by these techniques.
Summary of 2021-22 Enrollment Projections
Table 1 shows historical enrollment for the October 1 count in the Auburn School District over
the past 20 years. The data shows overall average growth over the recent 10 years is 1.24%.
This average, however, includes the -4.22% decrease in October 2020 enrollment due to the
COVID pandemic. Without this anomaly year, the average growth is at 1.58%. Enrollment
growth between 2012 and 2019 averaged over 2%.
7
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2021 thtough 2027
T16{€ t
GAAOI
XDG
I
2
J
I
5
6
1
3
9
ID
1l
t2
toT/tls
I,loE
1,o18
1,OL?
1,6
1.{O4
t,o7t
ton}s
rratus
r&N
It37
lJr9
tJll
l,ttt
10t
LOn
1.qt'
t o:i7
lort
Lr17
!"16',
LilT5
al't
!a{5
9$
'.BIAt.@4
1ra8
!,o45
!.Ero
Lq5
1.64
r,ot5
t2t?
lJar
tJt4
t ztig
0!Ftt
torr
leB
lBl
99t
t or:,
t.oto
r.oac
r,ut
lorr
r,t{5
Ltn
t"tft
tnt
tFlt
10to
1066
1dl5
1.0tl
102t
r.ot3
r.o4t
1,00
lllr
tr:r
Lzil
r"rll
t lSl
tl-{l
l.ap9
Lln
l,Bf
9lt5
tm
unt
1,6
t otz
1,all6
l":7,
1.1S
tt7'f
lJtO
f,t-lt
t"ott
r"6!t
tct
tlrt
lort
r,gfr
loar
1-fl6
lolrrJil
Lrtl
arl5
artl
l:-ta
117o
1183
Lt:IuE
l,t?:t
ldJS
Lgro
to72
Lllf
t"154
t"ut
,.XET
t-ts
1+t5
IJ'I
rJtt
r.t96
t.lt6
!.156
tJrz
t,8t
l,€t
l.!B
t27t
1.1&
Llat
rJrl
t+rf
Llrt
,.TE
t]8
t 2:p,
tI70
Lt7'j
txf
t o99
aIa
t"tA,
t31a
l'rtr
tl75
1At7
r8t
1:10
1,!&
1177
rJ't
l,lrt
1,!5r
1.ljt
t"tc
l"2ft
LZ'a
l,:at
L!ff
lt-lt
t16l
rJlf,
t.rs1
tJtt
t31t
r.z5a
rilt
tJgr
tJ&l
r'r't
f.il
Itt€
l'tf6
lt-l9
t,271
rJ$
t.ttt
tJ75
tSrt
t3t5
t275
l:3}
IJI'
!.rtl
lJrr
I,t9E
l.t16
rF:t
Ll9t
ta16
Llc5
1120
t11a
Lt6l
L1l?
t"tt5ts
t!r9
rjlg
r,ztt
Lrl'
tGll
|'tte
1.135
t 2{t
1,1{3
,,rt7
r,il4
tlfi
Itlg
1l6a
1t51
r3t5
t t71
ts
6RADT
tm
I
2
t
a
5
5
7
a
9
lo
1l
TI
rffff
*liorir-l Enrsl@ff: octobq r ffi15. x-!2 lk n5, 6, GAI sre: osPl D5s
oL42 tl{a 6-Oa Oa{t F{a fr4, 0r.s
ua *5 tll al 951 gao
qs m 9a2 s ,tt lott
qe fir !E 34 96t LCn
965 !q0 95 9rl rfiI loll
t,$77 97t C47 1.015 tlt loa!,
gg:t
ltt'
l,ott
tt7
Itt 9t9
l,fiI t olt t55
l,tor
rrzr
LO26
'r:trt.233
It11
Lltl
r.6lt&\w
r'oto
t.t24
l,tto
I,t$
1'180
L0r9
$t
tfil
t"ott
t"6t
ttIl
r,atp
u3.
r.6r
gcr Itl
188 l4l
194 -*311 4 xt LJ -lor .E -rtt 151 ttl ilo :IU EI 155 u ffi -7tI
t4dG.idls!t t5r 4ilX zaLl LfrX D.tE o-99 4ffi ffi atalJ L77Z 2.JE tiza 2W tffi 3.Jt*l-H L8'I -4.:!*
trFG uFft 116
ktf.Fdte'rAeb.n.dttls
'..l,a*
Aubum School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2021 lhrough2027
Due to the pandemic, it was important to consider the impact the current enrollment will have on
future projections. Using the Cohort Survival method, the decrease in enrollment of 4.22o/o in
October 2020 will skew enrollment projections for 2021 and beyond.
Some of the assumptions made in calculating projections for the 2021-22 school year are:
1. Kindergarten enrollment will return to pre-pandemic levels.
a. ASD Kindergarten classes are approximately 5% of births in King County. ln the
year 2016, there were 26,011live births in King County projecting approximately
1,300 students will be in Kindergarten in October 2021.
2. 2O2O-21 Kindergarteners who will be first graders in 2021 will return to "normal" pre-
COVID levels.
3. ASD will realize the enrollment growth due to new housing in 2021.
Calculations were made to create cohort scenarios based upon the following survival ratios: 3-
year average, 3-year weighted average, 6-year average, 6-year median, and the 1O-year
average. Two of the scenarios (3-year weighted average and 3-year average) were not
considered because of the impact October 2020 had on the calculation. The decision was made
to use the 6-year median scenario which is found in Table 2 below.
9
Auburn School District No. 408
GAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2021 l!,tough2027
10
TAEIE
t toided airtlF [bot d upft t+4r bitth flQtogct
?4,706
TOTATS BY LEVEL
ho:l0irth!
2t 2120lE
24,65724,337
5_O3?o5.O3%5,O3%
'22-216RAtr
TOTAtS
8l 861515A34224
o 46y"a_4v"0.86%a39%2-Jr%l.3t%
104s7
I(DG
L
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
xt
r-5
FA
9-12
FTRS
459 1aa
to25
24,617
5.03Io
2021
24,543
5.t3%
2019
24,490
5_Gl%
1020
24,924
5.03%
,o22
24,657
5.O3%
m$
26,01r.
5-43%
lo17
25,274
5-A3Yo
2+.to
'J.,242.72
r,270.23
L,301.99
1,328_50
1,368.8t)
'1,3i10.40
1,346_50
7.423.79
'L,48.2.97
r.,331.89
1,589.12
1.466.85
1,395.54
17,849
zG27
L,244
7,244
'l tat
1.311
1,388
a.447
L,142
1,348
L,342
1,489
1,521
1.449
ry24
17,ffis
2f,-24
r,224
1,306
r373
1,ru
1,313
1,3r0
I,275
L,290
1,325
1,523
1,555
1,382
r,26
!7,257
2&E
L,236.52
L,274.06
1,301.99
1,343.09
1.322.74
1,354.:15
1,398.34
1,465-31
t,t76.y
1,543-86
L,563.83
1,1137.58
L344.75
17,803
25-26
1,253_6
L,244.7t
1.285.O8
L,361.73
L42A.16
\144..24
1,323.47
1.326-1L
r.,315.31
1377.47
L,544.91;
r,470.90
1316.3t
17,5t,5
I,27I
L,34
1,09t)
1,289
L,293
L,2s
7,267
1,310
7,3$
1,511
1,,173
1,304
1,253
i,avt
7,A33
4,W
5,930
387
7,853
4,253
5,793
377
7,84
4,L45
5,964
3tfl
v.722
3.965
5,910
386
794t
3,€rill
5,887
384
7,471
3,!165
5,885
384
7,574
3,922
5,541
362
7 639
3,892
5,727
374
7,669
3.907
5,869
383
7,447
1,951
5,252
343
lG31
1,239.93
1,276.60
1,298.08
1,328.50
1,353.93
1,3A7.03
1.,332.83
1,371.m
r,440.95
'L,67A.t7
1.3?0"93
1,490.57
r.,423.96
1?,993
27-24
L,744.25
L,274.46
1,316.19
1,297.9
1,336.34
L,406.24
L.439.1.2
1,762.54
t,363.79
1.5L9.3t)
L,5t2.62
L.426.47
't,ffi.77
17,7X2
2L1:2
1,308
1,O66
,,263
1,268
1,267
I"274
L7a7
1,330
1.335
1,431
1,391
!,29L
1,,t4
16,6fi
24-25
r,2L2
1,258
1.335
1.401
1.133
1,331
1,302
1,300
1.305
1,501
1,558
7159
1.341
17$46
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2021 lhrough2027
Student Generation Factors
Planned residential development data is collected to determine the number of new residential
units that may be built in the near future. The projected units will have the appropriate Student
Generation Factor applied to determine the number of new students that planned residential
development might yield.
This data was obtained through discussions with the major developers within the District
boundaries, the City of Algona, Auburn, Kent, Pacific, King County, and District otficials. The
student population by residence includes all approved and tentative tract maps in addition to
any planned or proposed development that possibly will occur within the project timeframe. The
planned residential development information and phasing estimates are a snapshot of the
District as of this time. The information may change and is updated annually.
Closely related to the planned residential development units are Student Generation Factors.
When applied to planned residential development units, the Student Generation Factors
determine how many additional students will be generated from new construction within the
District.
Two sets of data are used to calculate Student Generation Factors: current student enrollment
and current housing data. This information associates each student with a housing unit. Two
general housing categories are analyzed: Single Family and Multi-Family. Data showing the
number of students generated from previous single- and multi-family developments generates
the Student Generation Factor to be applied to future developments.
The tables on the next two pages show the information for both single-and multi-family
developments. The components include:
o "Development Name" is a list of developments in process of filling occupancy. Fully
occupied developments stay on the list for five years contributing to the Student
Generation Factor. Once the five years is up, the development is removed from the list.
This component includes the name of the development, year of full occupancy (if
applicable), the number of units, the amount of current units occupancy and the
remaining units to be occuPied
o "Feeder Pattern" shows the elementary, middle and high schoolfeeder pattern
associated with the develoPment.
o "Actual Students" is the data of actual students generated from the units already
occupied.
o "student Generation Factors" is the calculation of actual students divided by the number
of occupied units.
o "single Family*2021 and beyond" lists the developments that are in process, but have
not yet started to occuPY units.
o The units for these developments are multiplied by the Student Generation Factor for
each to determine the "Estimated Students Based on Student Generation Factors"
tt
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2021 lhrough2027
The table at the bottom of the page shows an estimated timeline of when the unoccupied units
are scheduled to be occupied.
Table 3 shows the single- and multiple-family units to be occupied, the estimated number of
students generated and a timeline by year of when those students would potentially be enrolled
The bottom table reflects a cumulative number over a period of 7 school years.
The final page repeats enrollment projections by grade and summarized into grade bands.
Table 5 takes the projected enrollment by school year and added the projected students
generated for each school year to get an updated total projected enrollment.
L2
SINGLE FAMILY
Auburn School District
Development Growth since 1/1/'15
May 2020 (Based on Oct 1 , 201 I Enrollment)
reeucl
Elementary
Elementary 16
llalko
Aurthur Jacobsen
Fveroreen Hts.
Lea Hill
Fverdreen Hts.
Lea Hill
Elementarv 16
Bowman Creek
Bowman Creek
Bowman Creek
Bowman Creek
Bowman Creek
Chinook
Fveroreen Hts.
Everoreen Hts.
Aloac
Aurthur Jacobsen
Lea Hill
Hazelwood
Terminal Park
Elementary 16
Actual Students
Etem Mtoote H5 I Orat
6 10 13 29
14 4 1 19
69 JI 57 157
29 I I 47
1 2 0
0 0 0 0
8 8 4 20
28 13 14 55
43 26 101
21 I 11 40
81 4A 5U 171
51 JZ 24 107
30 15 7 52
0 0 0
50 30 29 109
6 0 7 13
0 1 1 2
7 q 8 2A
10 2 d 20
10 7 J 20
0 0 0
0 0 4 4
464 243 282 989Totals
purposes of this 2021 update, the District is choosing to continue to use the
remote learning and COVID-related enrollment disruption likely presents an
2020 Student Generation Factor data given
inaccurate data set of the students
generated from recent new development. The District will obtain updated data to calculate Student Generation Factors for
the 2022
13
Development Name Year of Full
Occuoancv
viltt5,
Parcels
uuttgrtL
Occuoancy Occupied
AIicie Glenn 2016 zo 28 0
Anthem
(formerlv Meqan's Meadows)2018 13 0
Bridqes 380 25
Canvon Creek 2018 151 151 0
Dulcinea 2018 6 6 0
Hastinos 10 7
Hazel View 20'18 22 aa 0
Kendall Ridoe 2015 106 106 0
Lakeland East Portola 2015 130 130 0
Lakeland Hills Estates 2017 oo 66 0
Edoeview at Lakeland Hills 2015 368 368 0
Lakeland: Pinnacle Estates 2018 99 99 0
Villas at Lakeland Hills 2015 81 81 0
Lozier Ranch 18 4 14
lvlonterev Park 2016 238 238 0
l\/ountain View 2018 55 0
Omnia Palisades Plate 16 3 IJ
Seremounte 2019 30 JU 0
Sonata Hills 2017 69 69 0
Soencer Place 2017 13 IJ 0
Vasiliv I 1 7
Willow Place 11 10
1918 1 855 63
student Generafl on Faclors
Elem Mroole H5 I Orat
0.214 0 357 0.464 1.036
1.077 0.308 o o77 I 462
0.'1 94 0.087 0'161 0.442
o 1s2 0.060 0.060 0.311
0.167 U-JJJ 0 000 0 500
0 000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.364 0.364 o 142 0.909
o 264 o.123 0.132 0 519
0 331 0.200 0.246 0.777
0.318 0.121 o'167 0 606
o 224 0.1 09 0.136 0.465
0 515 o.323 o.242 1.081
0.370 0.1 85 0.086 0.642
0 000 0.000 0.000 0.000
o 214 o.126 0.122 0.458
0.'1 09 0.000 o 127 0 236
0 000 0.333 0.333 0.667
o 233 o'167 0.267 0.667
0.'t45 0.029 0.1 16 0 290
0.769 0.538 0.231 1 538
0.000 0.000 0.000 0 000
0 000 0 000 0.400 0.400
0.250 0.131 0.152 0.533
Auburn School District
Development Growth since 1/1/15
May 2o2o (Based on Oct 1 , 201 I Enrollment)
SINGLE FAMILY-- 2020 and beyond
* currently under construction
For purposes of this 2021 update, the District is choosing to continue to use the 2020 Student Generation Factor data given
that remote learning and CovlD.related enrollment disruption likely presents an inaccurate data set of the students
generated from tecent new development. The District will obtain updated data to calculate Student Generation Factors for
to this Plan.
't4
Estimated Students Based on
Student Generation Factors
Middle HS TotalElem
742
1 1 42
5 2 e 10
2 53
4 2 e
5 1684
64 34 39 136
742
1 2 63
26 14 16 55
1
,|J2
19 10 11 39
211'l
'l 0 0 2
22105
4A 47 16377
't6 I 10 34
149 521245't28
Development Name units/
Parcels
Current
Occupancy
To Be
Occupied
Anderson ,cres 14 14
Backbone Ridoe 7 0 7
Bridle Estates '18 0 18
10 0 10
Greenvale 17 0 17
AT 30 0 30
Lakeland: Park Ridoe 256 0 256
Lakeland:?iver Rock*14 0 14
Pacific Lane 11 0 11
Ridoe At Tall T mhers '104 0 104
Richardson BLA/Plat 6 0 6
Huntionton Woods 74 0 74
4 0 4
Oxbow Acres 3 3
\A/vncresl 41 41
Wesoort Caoital 306 0 306
Current Partiall u Occrrnied DeveloDments 1918 63
2833 976
MULTI FAMILY
2020 and beyond
Totals
Auburn SchoolDistrict
Development Growth since 1/1/15
May 2020 (Based on Oct 1 , 201 9 Enrollment)
Feeder
Elementary
Lea Hill
Washington
15
Total
Estimated Students Based on
Student Generation Factors
21 I B 3B
98 42 40 179
216 o'l 87 396
0 0 0 0
335 143 135 514
Development Name Year of Full
Occupancy
Units/
Parcels
Current
Occupancy
To Be
Occupied
Promenade Apts 2018 294 294 0
The Villas at Auburn 2018 295 295 0
589 589 0
Actual Students
Elem Middle HS Total
205 98 90 393
50 11 13 74
255 109 103 467
Student Generation Factors
Elem Middle HS Total
0.697 0.333 0.306 1.337
0.1 69 0.037 0.044 0.251
0.433 0.185 0.175 0.793
Units/
Parcels
Current
Occupancy
To Be
Occupied
Sundallen Condos 4B 0 48
Auburn Town Center Apt 226 0 226
Copper Gate Apt.500 0 500
Current Partially Occupied Development 589 589 0
1363 774
For purposes of this 2021 update, the District is choosing to continue to use the 2020 Student Generation
Factor data s tven that remote learning and COVID-related enrollment disruption likely presents an inaccurate
set of the students generated from recent new development,The District will obtain updated data to
Generation Factors for the this Plan.
BASE DATA. BUILDOUT SCHEDULE
ASSUMPTIONS:
1. Build out estimates are received from developers.
2. Some development data received from Davis Demographics'
TABLE 3 Units to be ed
STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS
202L Single Family Multi-Family
Elementary 0.25 0.433
Middle 0.1 31 0.185
Hieh 0.152 o.'175
Total 0.533 0.793
Total202520262027202t202220232024
1 224824491Single Family Units 22 65
Projected Students
0 0 561.6 21 71.2Elementary (K-5)6
0 29TI510Middle (6-8)3 9
1 0 0 343L0\2 7Hieh (e-12)
t 11944235LTotal K-12 12 35
Multi-Family Units 350 126 0 0 0 0 0 476
Projected Students
Elementary (K-5)152 55 0 0 0 0 0 206
Middle (6-8)65 23 0 0 0 0 0 88
Hieh (e-12)5L 22 0 0 0 0 0 83
Total K-12 278 100 0 0 0 0 0 377
Total Housing Units 372 191 82 44 9 ,l ,l 700
Projected Students
Elementary (K-5)157 71 2t tT 2 0 0 262
Middle (6-8)68 32 1I 6 L 0 0 1L7
Hieh (e-12)55 32 12 7 L 0 0 'J_17
Total K-12 289 135 44 23 5 1 t 497
Cumulative Projection 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
Elementary (K-5)157 228 248 259 262 262 262
Middle (5-8)68 99 L10 tt6 tr7 .J.L7 1.17
Hieh (e-121 65 97 109 176 1.17 117 I\7
Total K-12 289 424 458 49L 496 496 497
16
TABIE 4 Enrollment Projections by Grade
GRADE 2020-21 2021-22 2d22-2t 202t-24 202+25 2025-25 2D26-2t
Klnder 1 034 1.308 1,2/r 7,224 7,212 7.254 t.240
1 1.236 1.055 1,144 1,306 1 )SA 7.245 1.288
2 7,243 1,263 1,090 1 ?73 1.335 7.28s t,272
3 7.243 r,264 1 7ag 1.112 1.401 1,362 t,37t
4 7,257 1 )67 1.793 1,313 I,I33 1,428 1.388
5 1,294 1.214 1.244 1,310 1,331 1 144 7.447
5 1.306 1.247 L,267 1,276 1.302 1.323 r.u2
7 1.319 1.330 1,310 1,290 1.300 1,326 1,348
8 1,2@ 1,33s 1 ?46 1.326 1,305 1,315 1,342
9r 1,351 7,431 1_511 t.523 1,501 1,4J1 1 449
10 1 ?76 1.391 \,413 1,555 1,568 1.545 t.s2l
11 7.174 1.291 1.304 r3a2 1 459 1.471 7,449
a2 1.090 1,140 1,253 1 )66 1.Ur 1.416 7,424
Totals 15.191 16650 77,034 17.257 L7,W L7,596 17,655
re€des912 include Fulflim. RunninE Sb4 Opsn Doore and GadAliance prog€m enrolhnt
TABLE 4a Enrollment Projectlons by Grade Band
2020-27 202r-22 2022-2t 2023-24 202+25 2025-26 202t27
K-5 7,317 7,446 7 571 7.638 7.670 7,-122 J,946
6-8 3.889 3.952 3,923 3 8q?3.907 3.965 3,a32
9.12 4.997 5,253 5,541 5,726 5.869 5.910 5.887
Totals 16,191 16.6s1 17.035 !7,256 9,46 17-596 17.565
TABLE 5 Enrollment Estimated Students
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 202+25 2025-26
2020-2!proiection
proiected
students
senerated
total
projection
prolection
proiected
students
senerated
total
proiection proiectlon
proi4ted
students
ren€rated
total
projection
projection
proiected
students
ren€rated
total
projection
proiectlon
proiected
students
renerated
total
projection
K-5 7,3lr 7 446 157 1.603 7,571 71 7.642 7,634 21 1,659 7.6'70 11 '1,681 1,722 2 7.724
6-8 3,889 3,952 6a 4,O20 3,923 32 3 955 3.492 11 3,903 ? 907 6 3,913 3,965 1 3.966
9,12 4,991 s,2s3 65 5.318 5.54 r 32 5,573 \ 7)6 12 5.734 5,869 7 5.476 5.910 1 5.911
Tolals 16.191 16.651 289 16 q40 17.035 135 77,770 17 7\6 44 17,300 t7,M6 )1 77.469 17,596 5
17
Auburn Sehool DMriet No. 408
Capiital F'acilities Plan
2041 thrcxugh ?0?7
$ection lll
Slandard of Ser"vjce
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2Q21 through2027
STANDARD OF SERVICE
The Schoot Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn, City of Black Diamond and the
City of Kent indicatethat each schoot district musf esfab/ish a "standard of Service" in order to asceftain the overall
capacity to houseits projected student poputation. The Superintendent of Public lnstruction esfab/ishes square footage
"capacity" guidetines for computing state funding support. The fundamental purpose of the OSPI guidelines
is to prwide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching funds for school construction proiects. By default
these guidelines have been used to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population. The OSPI
guidetines do not make adequate provision for tocat district program needs, facility configurations, emerging
educationat reform, or the dynamics of each student's educationat program. The Auburn School District Standard
of Seruice addresses those tocat considerations that require space in excess of the OSPI guidelines. The effect
on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatabte facilities is shown below for each grade articulation
pattern. Conditions that may resutt in potentiat space needs are provided for information pu4poses without
acco mp a ny i ng co m p utatio n s.
OVERVIEW
As reflected in enrollment numbers for the 2020-21school year, the Auburn School District operates
fifteen elementary schools housing 7,31 1 students in grades K through 5. The four middle schools house
3,889 students in grades 6 through 8. The District operates three comprehensive senior high schools and one
alternative high school, housing 4,991 students in grades 9 through 12. (Source: October 1,2020 Enrollment)
crAss srzE
The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the
student population. Specialists create additional space needs. Class sizes are subject to collective
bargaining agreements. Changes to class size agreements can have significant impact on available space
The current pupil/teacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 20.33 students per
teacher. Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 20.33 students per room at grades
K - S. At grades 6 - 8 the limit is set at 28.02 students per room. At grades 9 - 12 the limit is set at
28.74 students per room. The OSPI space allocation for each grade articulation level, less the computed
reduction for the Auburn School District Standard of Service, determines the District's capacity to house
projected pupil populations. These reductions are shown below by grade articulation level.
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
STRUCTIJRED LEARNING FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION
The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate to severe
disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses 15 classrooms to provide for 135 students.
The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. No loss of
capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to
total elementary population.
PATHWAYS SPECI AL EDUCATION
The Auburn School District operates an adaptive behavior program for students with behavior
disabilities at the elementary school level. The program uses three classrooms to provide for 24 students.
The housing requirements for this program exceed the OSPI space allocations.
(Three classrooms @20.33 - 8 ='12.33)
Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 12.33 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 12.33 each =
Total Capacity Loss =
(37)
0
19
(37)
Auburn School District No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2021 lhrough 2027
STANDARD OF SERVICE
S P ECI AL E DU CATI O N RESOURCE ROOMS
The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special
education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities. Twenty standard
classrooms are required to house this program. The housing requirements for this program are
provided for in the OSPI space guidelines at Lakeland Hills, Dick Scobee, and Bowman Creek
Elementary Schools. Continued loss of capacity is expected as growth in program is larger
than the total elementary population.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 17 (20-3) rooms @ 20.33 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @20.33 each =
Total CaPacitY Loss =
(346)
(346)
NATIVE AMER'CA'V RESOURCE ROOM
The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American
students at the elementary level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students'
Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @20.33 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @20.33 each =
Total Capacity Loss =
EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION
The Auburn School District operates a pre-school program for young children below age five with
disabilities. This program is housed at eleven different elementary schools and currently uses '13
standard classrooms. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI
space guidelines.
(264)
0
(264)
READING IABS
The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional
language arts instruction. These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces if available in
each elementary school. Four elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available, thus
theyare housed in a standard classroom. The housing requirementsforthis program are not
provided for in the OSPI space guidelines.
(102)
0
(102)
MUSIC ROOMS
The Auburn School District elementary music programs require one acoustically-modified classroom at each
school for music instruction. The housing requirements are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines.
0
(20)
0
(20)
Loss of Permanent Capacity'13 rooms @20.33 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @20.33 each =
Total CapacitY Loss =
Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 20.33 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each =
Total CapacitY Loss =
Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @20.33 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @20.33 each =
Total CaPacitY Loss =
(305)
0(msr
20
Auburn School District No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2021 through2O2T
STANDARD OF SERVICE
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARA'ERS PROGRAM
The Auburn School District operates pullout programs at the elementary school level for students
learning English as a second language. This program requires 30 standard classrooms that are not
provided for in the OSPI space guidelines.
SECOTVD GRADE TOSA PROGRAM
The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for eight highly-impacted
elementary schools. This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade
level and do not receive other services. This program requires eight standard classrooms that are
not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines.
(163)
0
(163)
ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM
The Auburn School District provides a learning specialist program to increase literacy skills for
first and second graders. This program model was originally created from the l-728 funds and currently
has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms, as well as pulling out students into
designated classrooms. The district is utilizing classrooms at all fourteen elementary schools.
(305)
0
(305)
EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION ASS'STANCE PROGRAM
The Auburn School District operates an ECEAP program for 236 pre-school aged children in twelve sections
of half-day length and one full-day program. The program is housed at seven elementary schools
and utilizes seven standard elementary classrooms and one additional classroom space
and seven auxiliary office spaces. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI
space guidelines.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 30 rooms @20.33 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each =
Total Capacity Loss =
Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 20.33 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @20.33 each =
Total Capacity Loss =
Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @20.33 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each =
Total Capacity Loss =
Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 20.33 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each =
Total Capacity Loss =
(610)
0Tiof
(142)
0
(142)
21
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2021 lhrough2O2T
STANDARD OF SERVICE
MIDDLE SCHOOLS
S P EC I AL ED UCATI O N RESOURCE ROOMS
The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level.
This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific
disabilities. Eleven classrooms are required at the middle school level to provide for approximately 330 students.
The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the OSPI space guidelines.
PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION
The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior
disabilities. The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses two classrooms. One of the
two classrooms for this program are provided for in the OSPI space allocations'
(28)
0
(28)
STRIJCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION
The Auburn School District operates seven structured learning classrooms at the middle school level for
students with moderate to severe disabilities. Two of the seven classrooms for this program are provided for
in the OSPI space allocations.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 rooms @28.02 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each =
Total CapacitY Loss
Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @28.02 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @28.02 each =
Total CapacitY Loss
Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @28.02 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @28.02 each =
Total CaPacitY Loss
(140)
0
(140)
NATIVE AMERICAAI RESOURCE ROOM
The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American
students at the middle school level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @28.02 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each =
Total Capacity Loss
EN G LI S H LAN G U AGE TEARTVERS PRO G RAM
The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for English Language
Learner students. This program requires ten standard classrooms that are not provide for in the OSPI
space guidelines.
(28)
0
(28)
(280)
0
(280)
22
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2021 lhtough2027
STANDARD OF SERVICE
ROOM UTILIATION
The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes
elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are
not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available
teaching stations. OSPI Report #3 dated 12114111 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the
mid-level facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @28.02 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @28.02 each =
Total Capacity Loss
(224)
0
(224)
23
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2021 lhrough2O2T
STANDARD OF SERVICE
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
N ATIVE AMER'CAA' RESO U RCE ROOM
The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American
students at the high school level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @28.74 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @28.74 each =
Total Capacity Loss
Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @28.74 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @28.74 each =
Total Capacity Loss
Loss of Permanent Capacity 12 rooms @28.74 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.7 4 each =
Total Capacity Loss
Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @28.74 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @28.74 each =
Total Capacity Loss
Loss of Permanent Capacity 12 rooms @28.74 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each =
Total Capacity Loss
(2e)
0
SEru'OR HIGH COMPUTER LABS
The Auburn School District support standard allows for one open computer lab at each of the senior high
schools. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines.
(2e)
(345)
0
(57)
0
(115)
0
(115)
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM
The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at three comprehensive high schools for English
Language Learner students. This program requires twelve standard classrooms that are not provided
for in the OSPI space guidelines.
PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION
The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior
diabilities. The program is housed at one of the high schools and uses two classrooms. The housing
requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI space allocations.
(345)
(57)
STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM
The Auburn School District operates twelve structured learning center classrooms for students with
moderate to severe disabilities. This program is housed at three high schools requiring standard
classrooms that are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines.
(345)
0
(345)
24
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2021 lhtough2O2T
STANDARD OF SERVICE
S PECI A L EDU CATI O N RESOURCE ROOMS
The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special
education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities. The current
high school program requires 15 classrooms to provide program to meet educational needs of
the students. The OSPI space guidelines provide for one of the 15 teaching stations.
(402)
0
(402)
P E RFO RMI NG AR TS CENTERS
Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center. The
OSPI lnventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity. This space was
not intended for, nor is it usable for, classroom instruction. lt was constructed to provide a
community center for the performing arts. Using OSPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet
computes to 208 unhoused students or 7 .25 classrooms.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 7.25 rooms @28.74 each = (208)
ROOM UTILIZATION
The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous
elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are
not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available
teaching stations. There are 185 teaching stations available in the senior high facilities. The utilization
pattern results in a loss of approximately 10 teaching stations.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @28.74 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @28.74 each =
Total Capacity Loss
Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 28.74 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @28.74 each =
Total Capacity Loss
STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS
ELEMENTARY
Loss of Permanent Capacity (2,294)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0
TotalCapacity Loss (2,294)
MIDDLE SCHOOL
Loss of Permanent Capacity (701)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0
Total Capacity Loss (701)
SENIOR HIGH
Loss of Permanent Capacity (1,789)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0
Total Capacity Loss (1,789)
TOTAL
Loss of Permanent Capacity (4,783)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0
Total Capacity Loss (4,783)
(287)
0
(287)
25
Au,burn Sehool Distrief No" 4OS
Gap.ital Facilitiee Plan
2021 thrs,ugh E'027
Sedipn lV
Inventory of FaeiIities
Aubum School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2021 through2027
INVENTORY OF FACILITIES
Table lV.1 shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OSPI rated capacities
Table lV.2 shows the number and location of each portable by school. The district uses relocatable facilities to:
1. provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school
populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting,
2. make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique
student needs, and
3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed.
Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on
existing physical plants. Core facilities (i.e. gymnasiums, restrooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc.) are
not of iufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable
classrooms.
Table
tv1
Permanent Facilities
@ OSPI Rated Capacity
(March 2021)
District School Facilities
Buildinq Capacity Acres Address
Schools
Washinoton Elementary 494 5.33 20 E Street Northeast Auburn
Terminal Park Elementary 415 6.09 1 101 D Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002
Dick Scobee Elementary 819 8.90 1031 14th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002
Pioneer Elementarv 441 8.40 2301 M Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002
Chinook Elementary 461 10.99 3502 Auburn Wav South, Auburn WA, 98092
Lea Hill Elementary 450 20.24 30908 124th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092
Gildo Rev Elementary 566 10.05 1005 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002
Everqreen Heiqhts Elem.463 10.10 5602 South 316th. Auburn WA, 98001
Aloac Elementarv 505 10.68 310 Milwaukee Boulevard North, Pacific WA, 98047
Lake View Elementary 581 16.44 16401 Southeast 318th Street, Auburn WA, 98092
Hazelwood Elementary 594 13.08 11815 Southeast 304th Street, Auburn WA, 98092
llalko Elementary 592 14.23 301 Oravetz Place Southeast, Auburn WA 98092
Lakeland Hills Elementary 594 12.00 1020 Evergreen Way SE, Auburn WA, 98092
Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 614 10.02 29205 132nd Street SE, Auburn WA, 98092
Bowman Creek Elementary 812 22.03 5701 Kersey Way SE, Auburn, WA 98092
ELEMENTARY CAPACITY 8401
Middle Schools
Cascade Middle School 837 16.94 1015241h Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002
Olvmpic Middle School 974 17.45 839 21"t Street SE. Auburn WA, 98002
Rainier Middle School 843 25.54 30620 1 16th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092
Mt. Baker Middle School 837 30.00 620 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002
MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3491
Senior High Schools
West Auburn HS 233 5.26 401 West Main Street, Auburn WA, 98001
Auburn HS 2.127 23.74 71'l East Main Street, Auburn WA, 98002
Auburn Riverside HS 1,387 35.32 501 Oravetz Road, Auburn WA, 98092
Auburn Mountainview HS 1,443 39.42 289Q0124th Ave SE, Auburn WA, 98092
HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5,190
27
Urban Growth Boundary
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2021 lhrough2027
INVENTORY OF FACILITIES
"TAP - Transition Assistance Program for 18-21 year old students with special needs
TABLE
w.2
TEM PORARY/RELOCATABLE
FACILITIES INVENTORY
(June 20211
Elementary Location 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027
Washington
Terminal Park
Dick Scobee
Pioneer
Chinook
Lea Hill
Gildo Rey
Evergreen Heights
Alpac
Lake View
Hazelwood
llalko
Lakeland Hills
Arthur Jacobsen
Bowman Creek
Elementary #16
7
8
0
0
b
13
4
4
8
2
2
7
7
4
0
0
7
7
0
0
0
0
3
4
I
2
2
7
7
4
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
3
4
8
2
2
7
7
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
4
8
2
2
7
7
4
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
3
4
8
2
2
7
7
4
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
3
4
I
2
2
7
7
4
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
3
4
8
2
2
7
7
4
0
0
TOTAL UNITS
TOTAL CAPACIry
72
1,464
5'l
1,037
44
895
44
895
44
895
44
895
44
895
Middle School Location 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027
Cascade
Olympic
Rainier
Mt. Baker
1
4
9
10
4
I
11
12
6
8
11
12
o
8
11
12
6
I
11
12
6
8
11
12
6
8
11
12
TOTAL UNITS
TOTAL CAPACITY
24
672
35
981
37
1,037
37
1,037
37
1,037
37
1,037
37
1,037
Sr. Hiqh School Location 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027
West Auburn
Auburn High School
Auburn High School - *TAP
Auburn Riverside
Auburn Mountainview
0
0
1
13
4
0
2
1
15
6
0
4
1
16
8
0
4
1
16
I
0
4
1
16
I
0
4
I
16
I
0
4
1
16
I
TOTAL UNITS
TOTAL CAPACIry
18
517
24
690
29
833
29
833
29
833
29
833
29
833
COMBINED TOTAL UNITS
COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY
114
2,654
110
2.707
110
2,765
110
2,765
110
2.765
110
2,765
110
2,765
29
Auburn €ahool Disffict No-408
Capital Faeilities Flan
2021 rhrol.igh2037
,Seetion V
Pupil Capacity
3t
Auburn School District No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2021 lhtough 2027
PUPIL CAPACITY
While the Auburn School District uses the OSPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from which to determine
space needs, the District's educational program requires more space than that provided for under the formula.
This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in Section lll, Standard of Service. The District's
capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional space to house its programs. Changes in the capacity of the
district iecognize new funded facilities" The combined effect of these adjustments is shown on Line B in Tables V.1
and V.2 below. Table V.1 shows the Distict's capacity with relocatable units included and Table V.2 without these units
'll New facilities shown in2019-20 through 2023-24 are funded by the 2016 School Bond lssue.
2/ The Standard of Service represents 27.69% of OSPI capacity. When new facilities are added the Standard of Service
computations are decreased to 24.16a/o of SPI capacity.
3/ Students beyond the capacity are accommodated in other spaces (commons, library, theater, shared teaching space).
25-26 26-27 27-2821-22 22-23 23-24 24-2520-21
Table V.1
Capacity
WITH relocatables
18,565
(2,018)
17,347.
17,665
(318)
2,765
@.783\
800
18,330
235
(2,018)
16,547
17,257
(710)
2,765
u.783\
18,565
(2,018)
16,547
17,446
(8ee)
2,765
(4,783)
18,565
(2,018)
16,547
17,596
(1,049)
2,765
(4,783)
18,565
(2,018)
16,547.
17,665
(1,1 18)
2,765
(4,783)
17,082
209
(2,018)
15,273
16,650
(1,377)
2,765
G.783\
(2,018)
16,312
17,034
(722)
2,765
(4,783)
291
650
389
1 7
(2,018)(2,018)(2,018)(2,018)(2,018)(2,018)(2,018)
SPI Capacity
SPI Capacity-New Elem
CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS
17,082A.
A.1
4.2
4.3
1
1
B.
c.
D.
E.
SP
Exclude SOS 1
D Enrollment
D Surplus/Deficit
2,654
(2,129)
78
SPI Capacity-New MS
lnclude Relocatable
16,702
(1,74e)
Capacity Adjustments
Net Capacity
26-27 27-2822-23 23-24 24-25 25-2620-21 21-22
Table V.2
Capacity
WITHOUT relocatables
18,565
(4,783)
13,782
17,596
(3,814)
(4.783)
18,565
(4,783)
28,364
17,665
10,699
(4.783\
18,565
800
(4,783)
14,582
17,665
(3,083)
(4,783)
17,082
209
(4,783)
12,508
16,650
(4,142)
4.783\
17,291
650
389
(4,783)
13,547
17,034
(3,487)
@.783\
18,330
235
(4,783)
13,782
17,257
(3,475)
(4,783)
18,565
(4,783)
13,782
17,446
(3,664)
(4,783\
17,082
0
(4,783)
12,299
16,702
(4,403)
(4,783)
(4,783)(4,783)(4,783)(4,783)(4,783)(4,783)(4,783)Total Adjustments (4,783)
SPI Capacity
SPI Capacity-New Elem
SPI Capacity-New MS
Capacity Adjustments
Net Capacity
CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS
1
B.
c.
D.
E-D Surplus/Deficit
Exclude SOS
D Enrollment
SPI
A.
A.1
4.2
A.3
31
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2021 lhtougn2o2T
PUPIL CAPACITY
PERMANENT FACILITIES
@ SPI Rated Capacity
(March 2021)
A,Schools
B. Middle Schools
C. Senior h Schools
Building 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28
Washington
Terminal Park
Dick Scobee
Pioneer
Chinook
Lea Hill
Gildo Rey
Evergreen Heights
Alpac
Lake View
Hazelwood
llalko
Lakeland Hills
Arthur Jacobsen
Bowman Creek
Elementarv #16
494
415
819
441
461
450
566
463
505
581
594
592
594
614
812
494
415
819
650
461
450
566
463
505
581
594
592
594
614
812
494
415
819
650
650
650
566
463
505
581
594
592
594
614
812
650
494
650
819
650
650
650
566
463
505
581
594
592
594
614
812
650
494
650
819
650
650
650
566
463
505
581
594
592
594
614
812
650
494
650
819
650
650
650
566
463
505
581
594
592
594
614
812
650
494
650
819
650
650
650
566
463
505
581
594
592
594
614
812
650
494
650
819
650
650
650
566
463
505
581
594
592
594
614
812
650
ELEMENTARY CAPACITY 8,401 8,610 9.649 9,884 9,884 9,884 9,884 9,884
Buildinq 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28
Cascade
Olympic
Rainier
Mt. Baker
Middle School #5
837
974
843
837
837
974
843
837
837
974
843
837
837
974
843
837
837
974
843
837
837
974
843
837
837
974
843
837
837
974
843
837
800
MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3,491 3,491 3,491 3,491 3,491 3,491 3,491 4,291
Buildinq 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28
West Auburn
Auburn
Auburn Riverside
Auburn Mountainview
233
2,127
1,387
1,443
233
2,127
1,387
1,443
233
2,127
1,387
1.443
233
2,127
1,387
1.443
233
2,127
1,387
1,443
233
2,127
1,387
1.443
233
2,127
1,387
1,443
233
2,127
1,387
1,443
HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5.1 90 5,1 90 5,190 5,1 90 5,1 90 5,1 90 5,1 90 5,1 90
COMBINED CAPACITY 17,082 17,291 18,330 18,565 18,565 18,565 18,565 19,365
32
Auburn Sehool DJstrict No-408
Capital Facillties' Plan
2021 through2A2T
Secti0n Vl
Gapital Construction Plan
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2021 lhrough2027
CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN
The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974
with the formation of a community wide citizens committee. The result of this committee's work was
published in the document titled 'Guidelines for Development.' ln 1985 the Board formed a second
AO noc citizens committee to further the work of the first and address the needs of the District for
subsequent years. The work of this committee was published in the document litled 'Directions for
the Nineties.' ln 1995 the Board commissioned a third Ad Hoc citizens committee to make
recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and physical facilities. The committee
recommendations are published in the document titled'Education lnto The Twenty-First Century - -
A Community lnvolved.'
The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop plans for the implementation,
funding, and deployment of technology throughout the District's programs. The 1996 Bond
proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate technological
applications. The 1998 Capital Levy provided funding to further deploy technology at a level
sufficient to support program requirements in every classroom and department. ln 2005,2014, and
2020, replacement technology levies were approved to continue to support technology across all
facets of the District's teaching, learning and operations.
ln addition to the technology needs of the District, the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District
must prepare for continued student enrollment growth. As stated in their report, "the District must
pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible." The Ad Hoc recommendation included
commentary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent rates of tax assessments.
A proposition was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that provided $8,000,000 over six years
to'address some of the technology needs of the District; and $5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire
school sites.
During the 1997-98 school yeat, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the
Auburn and Dieringer School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school
population from an area that includes a large development known as Lakeland South. Lakeland
South at that time was immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the Auburn School District.
On June 16, 1998, the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the
Auburn and Dieringer Boards of Directors. On June 22,1998, the Auburn School Board adopted
Resolution No. 933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District
in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 23, 1998, the Dieringer
School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 24-97-98 authorizing the process to initiate the
adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These
aciions resulted in the transfer of an area from Dieringer to Auburn containing most of the Lakeland
South development and certain other undeveloped properties.
Property for the third comprehensive high schoolwas acquired in 1999. The Board placed the
proposiiion to construct a new high school on the ballot four times. Each election was extremely
close to passing. After the fourth failure a community meeting was held and from that meeting the
Board determined need for further community study.
ln April of 2002, the Board formed a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two
items and make recommendations to the Board in the Fall of 20O2:
a. A review of the conclusion and recommendations of 1985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees
related to accommodating high school enrollment growth. This included the review of
possible financing plans for new facilities.
b. bevelop recommendations for accommodating high school enrollment growth for the next 10
years if a new senior high school is not built.
34
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2021 through2027
CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN
This committee recommended the Board place the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in
February 2003. The February election approved the new high school at 68.71% yes votes. The
school opened in the fall of 2005.
ln the fall of 2003, the Board directed the administration to begin the planning and design for
Elementary #13 and Elementary #14. ln the fall of 2004, the Board passed Resolution No. 1054 to
place two elementary schools on the ballot in February 2005. The voters approved the ballot
measure in February of 2005 a|64.72o/o. Lakeland Hills Elementary (Elemenlary #13) opened in the
fall of 2006. Arthur Jacobsen Elementary (Elementary #14) is located in the Lea Hill area and
opened in the fall of 2007. These two elementary schools were built to accommodate the housing
groMh in Lakeland Hills and Lea Hill areas of the school district.
ln the 2004-05 school year, the Board convened a sixth Citizen's Ad Hoc committee to again study
and make recommendations about the future impacts in the District. One of the areas of study was
the need for New Facilities and Modernization. The committee made a number of recommendations
including school size, the need for a new middle school, and to begin a capital improvements
program to modernize or replace facilities based upon criterion.
During the 2005-06 school yeat, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the
Auburn and Kent School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school
population that will come from an area that includes a number of projected developments in the
north Auburn valley. On May 17,2006, the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a
joint meeting of the Auburn and Kent Boards of Directors. On June 14,2006, the Kent School Board-adopted
Resolution No. 1225 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of
the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 26, 2006, the
Auburn School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 1073 authorizing the process to initiate
the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation.
Thessactions resulted in the transfer of an area from the Kent School District to the Auburn School
District effective September 29, 2006.
ln October of 2008, after two years of review and study, a Steering Committee made
recommendations to the Board regarding the capital improvements program to modernize or replace
facilities as recommended by the 2004-05 Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee. These recommendations,
based on specific criteria, led to the Board placing a school improvement bond and capital
improvements levy on the ballot in March 2009. Voters did not approve either measure that would
have updated 24 facilities and replaced three aging schools. The Board decided to place only a six-
year Capital Levy on the ballot in November of 2009, which passed at 55.17o/o. The levy funded
$46.4 million of needed improvement projects at 24 sites over the following seven school years.
Planning for the replacement of aging schools was started with educational specifications and
schematic design process for the replacement of Auburn High School.
The District acquired a site for a future high school in 2008 and a second site for a future middle
school in 2009. The District also continued efforts to acquire property around Auburn High School.
The Special Education Transition Facility opened in February of 2010. This facility is designed for
students with disabilities that are 18 to 21 years old.
ln the November 2012 election, the community supported the $1 10 million bond issue for the Auburn
High School Modernization and Reconstruction Project at620/o. Construction began in February
ZOt g. f ne entire new building was occupied by Auburn High School students and staff in the fall of
2015, with site improvements being completed during the 2015-16 school year.
35
!
1t
4
1t
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
202'l lhrough 2027
CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN
ln January 2015, a citizen's ad hoc committee was convened by direction of the Board to address
growth and facilities. The major recommendations were to construct two new elementary schools in
the next four years and to acquire 3 new elementary school sites as soon as possible.
ln the November 2016 election, the community supported the $456 million bond issue for the
replacement of six schools and the construction of two new elementary schools a|62.83o/o.
Construction for the replacement of Olympic Middle School began in May 2018 and was completed
in Fall 2019. Construction for New Elementary School #15 began in May 2019 and was completed
in Fall 2020. Construction for the replacement of Dick Scobee Elementary School began in June
2019 and was completed in Fall2020. Construction for New Elementary School#16 and
replacement of Pioneer Elementary School began in May 2020 and will be completed in Fall2O21.
Construction for replacement of Chinook and Lea Hlll Elementary Schools began in June 2021 and
will be completed in Fall of 2022. Construction for replacement of Terminal Park Elementary School
will begin in June 2022 and will be completed in Fall of 2023.
We anticipate running a Capital Bond Measurein2026. Funds will be used to construct a new
middle school on property currently owned by the District, and may include funds to replace one or
more existing schools.
The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years. The exact
timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population.
may be secured through a 2016 Bond lssue, sale fees, and state
matching funds.
I Thes-e funds may be secured through a combination of a bond issue, impact fees, and state matching funds.
2021-27 Capital Gonstruction Plan
(Mav 20211
Proiect Funded
Projected
Cost
Fund
Source
Proiect Timelines
21-221 22-x I ;n-24 I z4-2s I 2s-20 | 26-27 | 27-28
Technology
Modernization Yes $35,000,000
2020
6 Year
Cap. LeW
XX XX XX XX XX XX
Portable Relocation Yes $1,400,000 lmpact
Fees XX
Property Purchase -
'1 New Elementarv Yes $7,500,000 Bond
lmpact Fee XX
Middle School#5 Yes $1 12,000,000 Bond
lmpact Fee
XX
plan
XX
const
XX
const
XX
open
Replacement of five
Elementary Schools Yes $242,500,000 Bond XX
const
XX
const
XX
open
36
Auburn School District No.408
Capital Facilities Plan
2021 through2027
Section Vll
lmpact Fees
IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION (Spfing 2021)
I. SITE COST PER RESIDENCE
Formula: ((Acres x Cost x Student Factor
U. PERMANENT FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCE
Formula: ((Facility x Student
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2021 lhtough2O2T
to Totalx
III. TEMPORARY FACIUTY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RES'DENCE
Formular ((Facility x to Total
IV.W
Formula: (Boeckh lndex xSPl x Match x Student
38
Site
Acreaoe
CosV
Acre
Facility
Capacitv
Student Generation Factor
Sinole Familv Mulii Familv
CosU
Sinqle Family
CosU
Multi Family
Elem (K - 5)
Middle Sch (6 - 8)
Sr Hioh (9 - 12)
15
25
40
$0
$0
s0
650
800
1500
0.2500
0.'t310
0.1520
0.4330
0.1850
0.1 750
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$o.N $o.oo
Facility
Cost
Facilrty
S ize
% Perm Sq FU
Total Sq Ft
Student Generation Factor
Sinqle Family Multi Family
cosu
Sinole Familv
CosU
Multi Family
Elem (K - 5)
Vlid Sch (6 - 8)
Sr Hioh (9 - 12)
$0
$1 12,000,000
$0
650
800
1500
0.9459
0.9459
0.9459
0.2500
0.1310
0.1 520
0.4330
0.1850
0.1 750
$0.00
$17,348.09
s0.00
$0.00
$24,499.22
$0.00
$17,348.09 s24.499.22
cosu
Sinole Familv
CosU
Multi Family
Facjlity
Size
% Temp Sq FV
Total Sq Ft
Student Generation Factor
Sinqle Family Multi Family
Facility
Cost
$230.38
$71.42
$65.86
0.0541
0.0541
0.0541
o.2500
0.1310
0.1520
0.4330
0.1850
0.1750
$1 33.02
$50.57
$57.21
Sch (6 - 8)
$200,000
$200,000
$200.000
20.33
24.O2
28.74
Cosu
Sinole Familv
CosV
Multi Familv
State
Match
Student Generation Factor
Sinole Familv Multi Family
Boeckh
lndex
SPI
Footage
$0.00
$2,992.38
so o0
0.2500
0.1 31 0
o.1520
0.4330
0.1850
o.1750
$0.00
$2,1 18.93
$0.00
$0.00
$23A.22
$0.00
90
108
130
62.4t%
62.87Vo
62.87VoSr
Sch (6 - 8)
$2.118.93 $2,992.39
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2021 lhtough2O2T
V. TAXCREDITPERRESIDENCE
Formula: Expressed as the present value of an annuity
TC = PV(interest rate,discount period,average assd value x tax rate)
VI. DEVELOPER PROVIDED FACIUTV CREDIT
Formula: (Value of Sito or Facility/Number of dwelling units)
39
Tax Credit
Multi Familv
Number ot
Years
Tax Credit
Sinole Familv
Ave Resid
Assd Value
Curr Dbt Seru
Ta Rate
Bnd Byr lndx
Ann lnt Rate
$8.r65.58
2 440/69197't41
Single Family
Multi
No. of Units
Family
Multi $0.00
FEESPE
Multiple
Family
Single
Family
FEE
RECAP
SUMMARY
$1 7,348.09
$240.79
($2,1 1 8.93)
$0.00
$24,499.22
$367.67
00
165.
Permanent Facility Const Costs
Facility Costs
State Match Credit
Credit
FEE (No Discount)
FEE (50% Discount)
Less ASD Discount
Facility Credit
$7,304.37
$3,652.19
$0.00
$0.00
$1 /,8/6.45
$8,938.23
s0.00
$0.00
$3.852.19Net Fee Oblidation
Cosf
Auburn School oiskict No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2O2'l lhrcugh2027
40
IMPACT FEE ELEMENTS
SINGLE FAMILY MULTI FAMILY
Elem
K-5
Mid Sch
6-8
Sr High
9-12
Elem
K-5
[/id Sch
6-8
Sr High
9-12
Student Factor
New Fac Capacity
New Facility Cost
Temp Rm Capaclty
T6mp Facility Cost
Site Acreage
Site Cost/Acre
Perm Sq Footage
Temp Sq Footage
Total Sq Footage
% - Pem Facilities
o/o - Temp Facilities
SPI Sq Ft/Student
Boeckh lndex
N4atch % - State
Match % - District
Dist Aver AV
Debt Seru Tax Rate
G. O Bond lnt Rate
Single Family - Auburn actual count April 2020
Mliddle School Cost Estimate May 2021
ASD District Standard of Service.
Grades K - 5 @ 20.33, 6 - I @ 28.02, & 9 - 12 @ 28.74.
Relocatables, including site work, set up, and furnishing.
ASD District Standard or SPI Minimum
See below
15 Elementary, 4 lvliddle, and 4 High Schools
2 x 768 SF + 24 x864 SF + 87 x896 SF + TAP 2661
Sum of Permanent and Temporary above
Permanent Sq. Footage divided by Total Sq. Footage
Iemporary Sq. Footag€ divided by Total Sq. Footage
From OSPI Regulations (WAC 392-343-035)
From OSPI projection for July 2020
From OSPI May 2O2o
Computed
King County Department of Assessments March 2020
Current Fiscal Year
Current Rate - (Bond Buyer 20 lndex Feb. 2O2O aug\
0.250
650
20.33
$200,000
12
$444,771
1,799/23
102,885
1,902,308
94.59o/o
5.41%
90
$238.22
62.a7lo
3713%
$402,640
$2.31
2.44yo
0.131
800
$1 1 2,000,000
28.O2
$200,000
25
$444,771
1,799,423
102,885
1,902,308
94.59o/o
5.41o/o
'108
8238.22
62.87Vo
37.13o/o
$402,640
$2.31
2.44o/o
o.152
I 500
24.74
$200,000
40
$444,771
1,799,423
'102,885
1,902,308
94.590/o
5.41o/o
130
$238.22
62.87Vo
37.13o/o
s402,640
$2.31
2.44%
0.433
650
$0
20.33
$200,000
12
$444,771
1,799,423
1 02,885
1,902,308
94.59o/o
5.41o/o
90
$238.22
62.a7o/o
37.13o/o
$197,141
$2.31
2 440/0
0.185
800
$112,000,000
28.02
$200,000
25
s444,771
1,799,423
1 02,885
1,902,308
94.59%
5.410/o
108
$238.22
62.A7%
37 .13o/o
$197,141
$2.31
2A4%
o.175
1 500
28.74
$200,000
40
$444,771
1,799,423
102,885
1,902,308
94.59Vo
s.410/0
130
$23a.22
62.87V.
37.130/"
$1 97,141
$2.31
2.44V.
Recent Property
Acouisitions Acreaqe
Purchase
Year
Purchase
Price
Purchase
CosUAcre
Adjusted
Present Day
Projected Annua
lnflation Factor
Srtes
Required
Latest Date
of Acquisition
Projected
CosUAcre
Elem. #16 Parcel 1
Elem. #16 Parcel 2
Elem. #16 Parcel 3
'1.26
8.1 9
080
2019
2019
20'18
$480,000
$2,959,561
$460,000
$382,166
$361,363
s575.000
$441,401
$417,374
$730.538
10.00%Elementary 2022 $489,248
2019 Annual
lnflation Factor
'to ooo/.
2O2O Annual
lnflation Factor
5o/o
2021 Annual
lnflation Factor
1 0.00%Total 10.25 $3.899.561 $380.593 $444,771
School District Capital Facilities Plans
General Statistics
School District:Kent Federal Wav Auburn
Student Generation Rates
=Eo
LL
I
OJ
cT)ca
Elementary
Middle
Senior High
.277(v)
.071(v)
.086(v)
0.138s(v)
0.0s7e(v)
o.o60s (v)
0.2s0(-)
0.131(-)
0.1s2(-)
=E
|otL
I'r=
f
=
Elementary
Middle
Senior High
.2s8(4)
.o8B(f )
.100(f )
0.3e46 (v)
0.2161(v)
0,2067 (v)
0.433(-)
0.18s(-)
0.17s(-)
Enrollment 2020-202L 24,582(v)20,283(v)16,191(v)
STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING }
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
PUBLIC NOTICE
Rudi Alcott, being first duly sworn on oath that he is the
Vice President of Advertising for Sound Publishing,
which publishes the
Kent Reporter
a weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general
circulation and is now and has beln for more than six months prior to the date
of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language
continuousiy as a weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The
Kent- Covington Reporter tras been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of
the superior courr of the state of washington for King county.
The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of
the Kent- Covington Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was reguiarly
distributed to its subsuiters during the below stated period' The annexed
notice, a:
Public Notice #KENe42Bs3
was published on November L9'202L
The iull amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the
sum of
Rudi Alcott
Vice President, Advertising
Subscribed and sworn to me this 19th day of November, 1AZL.
Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in
Washington
w{frA,?,r
$r*u'f' tr.L Li FJ
Classified Proof
CITY OF KENT
NOTICE OF
OROINANCES
PASSED BY THE CITY
couilctL
The following are sum-
maries of ordinanms
passed by the Kent City
Council on November
16,20?1.
ORDINANCE NO. 4413
-AN ORDINANCE ofthe
City Council of the City
of Kent, Washingion, aF
proving the consolidalingbudget adjustments
made between July 1,
2021 and Septomber 30,
2021, refrecling an over-
all budget increase ol
$13,102.218.
This ordinance shall take
effect and be in force
five days after publica-
tion, as provided by law.
ORDINANCE NO, 4414
- AN ORDINANCE ofthe
City Council of the Cityof Kent. Washington,
amending the Kent
Comprehensive Plan
and its Capilal Facilities
Element to reflect a six-
year Capital lmprove-
ment Program for capital
improvement projects
(2022 -?O27l. (CPA-202 1 -
3). This ordinance shall
take effuct and be in
force 30 days from and
after its passage, as pro-
vided by law.
ORDINANCE NO, 4415
- AN ORDINANCE of the
City Council ot the Cityof Kent, Washington,
amending the Kent
Comprehensive Plan
and ils Capital Facilities
Element to include the
Capital Facilities Plansof the Kent, Federal
Way, and Auburn School
Districts (CPA-2021-4).
This ordinance will take
effect and be in force 30
days from and after its
passage. as provided by
Proofed by Jennifer Tribbett, 11110/2021 12:43:14 pm Page:2
Classified Proof
law.
ORDINANCE NO. 4416
- AN ORDINANCE of the
Citv Council of the CitY
of ' Kent, Washington,amendino Section
12.13.160 of the Kent
Gitv Code to adiust the
scliool impact fee sched-
ules {CPA-2020-4) This
ordinince shall take ef-
feot and be in force 30
davs from and after its
paisage, as Provkled bY
law.
ORDINANCE NO, 4/17
- AN ORDI NANCE of the
Citv Council of the CitY
of ' Kent, Washington,
amending th€ Kent
Coniorehensive Plan
and its Capital Facilities
Element to include ihe
Six-Year Capital lr+'
orovement Plan of the
iruqei Sound RegionalFir; AuthoritY
(CPA-2021-1 ). This ordi-
nance wili take effect
and be in force 30 daYs
from and after its Pas-
sage, as Provided b1i
law.
ORDINANCE NO. 4418
-AN ORDINANCE ofthe
CiW Council of the CitY
of - Kent, Washington,
levying 2021 Property
taxes for the second
vear of the ?021-2022
biennial budg€t for the
Citv of Kent. This ordi-
nance shall tako effect
and be in force five daYs
after the date of its Publi-
cation as provided for bY
RCW 35A-11.090 and
RCW 35A.12.130; how-
ever, the Property tax
levied ihrough this ordi-
nance shall not be as-
sessed for collect-ton un-
til JanuaN 1, 2022.
ORDINANCE NO. 4419
- AN ORDINANCE of the
Citv Council of the CitY
of kent, Washington, re-
latino to the mid-biennial
revidw and modification
ot lhe 2021-2022 biennt-
al budget as required bY
RCW 354.34.'i30 and
Ordinance No' 4381;
adootino certain modifi-
cati6nsio the 2022 bud-
oet: and establishing an
iffective date. This ordi-
nanoe shall take effect
and be in force five daYs
afler the date of its Publi-
cation as orovided for bY
RCW 35A.11.090 and
RCW 35A.12'130; how-
ever, the budget author-
ized through this ordi-
nance shall be €ffective
Januaw 1,?Q22.
oRDIN1NCE NO. 4420
- AN ORDINANCE ofthe
Citv Council of the CitY
of kent, Washington, re-
latilro to land use and
zoniig, specificallY the
rezonino of a 448-acre
parcel l-ocated at 23703
Militarv Road Soulh,
Kent. 'Washington from
CC (Communiiy Com-
mercial) to GC (General
Commercial). This ordF
nance shall take effect
and be in force 30 daYs
from and after its Pas-
Proofed by Jennifer Tribbett, 1111012021 12:43:14 pm Page:3
Classified Proof
sage.
A copy cf the complete
text of any ordinance 'lillbe mailed upon request
of the City Clerk.
l(irnberley A- KomDlo,
City Clerk
Kkomoto@KeniWA.gov
253-456-5725
11i19!21
Proofed by Jennifer Tribbett, 11/10/2021 12:43:14 pm Page:4