Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 6/21/2016adccW11411 Mayor Suzette Cooke Council President Bill Boyce Councilmembers Jim Berrios Tina Budell Brenda Fincher Dennis Higgins Dana Ralph Les Thomas City of Kent Council MeetingAgenda June 21, 2016 This page intentionally left blank. KENT CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS June 21, 2016 Council Chambers Mayor Suzette Cooke Council President Bill Boyce Councilmember Jim Berrios Councilmember Tina Budell Councilmember Brenda Fincher Councilmember Dennis Higgins Councilmember Dana Ralph Councilmember Les Thomas ******************************************************************** COUNCIL WORKSHOP AGENDA 5 p.m. Subject Speaker Time Kent Creates Website Demo Ronda Billerbeck 15 min Mill Creek & Springbrook Creek Rehabilitation Project Matt Knox 30 min James Street Closure Eric Connor 15 min COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA 7 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2. ROLL CALL 3. CHANGES TO AGENDA FROM COUNCIL, ADMINISTRATION, OR STAFF 4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A. Public Recognition B. 2016 Employee of the Year - Bryan Reil C. Appointment to Kent Arts Commission D. Community Events E. Public Safety Report F. Intergovernmental Reports G. Financial Sustainability Task Force 5. PUBLIC HEARING A. 2017 -2022 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) - Resolution – Adopt B. Surplus of Utility Equipment and Materials – Public Hearing 6. PUBLIC COMMENT - Please state your name and address for the record. You will have up to three (3) minutes to provide comment. Please address all comments to the Mayor or the Council as a whole. The Mayor and Council may not be in a position to answer questions during the meeting. For more details regarding the public comment process, please refer to the section titled, “Public Comments,” on the reverse side. 7. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Minutes of Previous Meetings and Workshops – Approve (Continued) COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA CONTINUED B. Payment of Bills – Approve C. Appointment to Kent Arts Commission – Confirm D. Amendment to Consultant Services Agreement with KBA, Inc. for Central Ave S. Construction Management Project – Authorize E. Change Order with Peterson Brothers, Inc. for 2016 Guardrail Repairs – Authorize F. Amendment to the Consultant Services Agreement with AECOM for Upper Mill Creek Dam Improvements – Authorize G. King County Flood Control District Sub-Regional Opportunity Fund for Upper Mill Creek Dam Improvements Project – Authorize H. Connecting WA Grant for S. 228th Street Union Pacific Grade Separation Project - Authorize I. Interlocal Agreement with King County Flood Control District for the Milwaukee II Levee Project – Authorize J. Primary Data Center Assessment and Improvement Project – Authorize K. Agreement with Community Connectivity Consortium for C3 High Speed Fiber Optic Ring Extension Project – Authorize L. Naden Avenue Properties Surplus Consideration – Authorize 8. OTHER BUSINESS A. Zoning Code Amendment – Medical Marijuana Patient Cooperatives – Ordinance – Adopt 9. BIDS 10. REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES, COUNCIL, AND STAFF 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION AND ACTION AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION 12. ADJOURNMENT NOTE: A copy of the full agenda packet is available for perusal in the City Clerk's Office. The Agenda Summary page and complete packet are on the website at KentWA.gov An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of this page. Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City Clerk's Office in advance at 253.856.5725. For TDD relay service, call the Washington Telecommunications Relay Service at 1.800.833.6388. COUNCIL WORKSHOP 1) Kent Creates Website Demo, Ronda Billerbeck 2) Mill Creek & Springbrook Creek Rehabilitation Project, Matt Knox 3) James Street Closure, Eric Connor This page intentionally left blank. CHANGES TO THE AGENDA FROM COUNCIL, ADMINISTRATION, OR STAFF This page intentionally left blank. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A) Public Recognition B) 2016 Employee of the Year – Bryan Reil C) Appointment to Kent Arts Commission D) Community Events E) Public Safety Report F) Intergovernmental Reports G) Financial Sustainability Task Force Agenda Item: Public Hearing – 5A_ TO: City Council DATE: June 21, 2016 SUBJECT: 2017 -2022 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) - Resolution – Adopt SUMMARY: The 2017-2022 Six-Year TIP represents the City’s proposed transportation improvement work program for the next six years. Per RCW 35.77.010, the six-year plan for each city shall specifically set forth those projects and programs of regional significance for inclusion in the transportation improvement program within that region. The program is also required to be consistent with the Kent Comprehensive Plan. Including these projects in the Six-Year TIP allows the City to search for funding partners and apply for grants. Most state and federal agencies require that projects being submitted for grants be included in the City’s adopted Six-Year TIP. Since the May 2, 2016, Public Works Committee meeting, the following revisions have been made to the TIP: 1. An introduction, project list, and map were added; 2. Funding sources and projected sources were listed with greater specificity; and 3. Edits were made to correct grammatical or typographical errors, including an error on page 25, which was corrected from $54,000,000 to $5,400,000. EXHIBITS: 1) Resolution; and 2) 2017-2022 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee YEA: Fincher, Ralph, Higgins NAY: BUDGET IMPACTS: Each project or program within the TIP has a different budget impact as noted in the narrative. MOTION: Adopt Resolution No. approving the 2017-2022 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program. This page intentionally left blank. RESOLUTION NO. ___________ A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, adopting the 2017 through 2022 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program. RECITALS A. After proper notice, the City Council of the City of Kent held a public hearing at the regular meeting of the City Council at 7:00 p.m. on June 21, 2016, to consider public testimony on the City’s proposed 2017 through 2022 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program. B. Having considered public testimony to the plan, the Council would like to adopt the 2017 through 2022 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: RESOLUTION SECTION 1. – Adoption. The 2017 through 2022 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program, set forth in Exhibit “A,” which is attached and filed with City Clerk, is hereby adopted. 1 2017-2022 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program PASSED at a regular open public meeting by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, this 21st day of June 2016. CONCURRED in by the Mayor of the City of Kent this _____ day of __________, 2016. SUZETTE COOKE, MAYOR ATTEST: SUE HANSON, INTERIM CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. ______ passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, June 21, 2016. SUE HANSON, INTERIM CITY CLERK P:\Civil\Resolution\SixYearTIP2017.docx 2 2017-2022 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program CITY OF KENT WASHINGTON SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2017 – 2022 Mayor Suzette Cooke Timothy J. LaPorte, PE, Director of Public Works Table of Contents: Resolution ............................................................................................ i Introduction ........................................................................................ iii Project List ......................................................................................... vi 2017 – 2022 Six-Year TIP Cost Estimates .............................................. viii Map of Projects ................................................................................... ix Project Descriptions .............................................................................. 1 Contact Information ............................................................................ 27 On the Cover: Central Avenue South Improvements iii Introduction Overview The Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a short-range planning document that is updated annually based on needs and policies identified in the City’s adopted Comprehensive Plan and Transportation Master Plan. The TIP represents Kent’s current list of needed projects that are anticipated to begin preliminary engineering, right of way acquisition or construction within the next six years. The TIP also includes ongoing citywide transportation programs. Projects and programs included in the plan are those that are considered to be regionally significant. The document identifies secured or reasonably expected revenue sources for each project or program. The TIP serves as a draft work plan for the development of the local transportation network. Once adopted, the TIP will guide funding and implementation priorities during the development of the transportation portion of the Six -Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The CIP shows the City-funded portion of projects and is constrained by current budget forecasts, whereas the TIP shows a complete project list with the variety of funding sources and partners involved. Historically, the largest sources of funding for TIP capital projects have been grants. Funding for transportation projects is available from federal, state and local resources. Each funding source has specific rules and guidelines about what types of projects they will fund, how much of a project will be funded and timelines for expenditure of funds. Additionally, most grant programs require a funding match, which means that the City must also contribute funding to the cost of a project. The City of Kent funds transportation capital projects using the General Fund, Street Fund, Local Improvement Districts, Transportation Impact Fees, Business and Occupation Tax, Solid Waste Utility tax, and grant revenue from local, state and federal governments. One of the reasons the TIP is updated annually is because many of these revenue sources are so closely tied to the health of the economy they can be somewhat unpredictable. Document structure Each project or program listed in the TIP includes an estimated cost, the amount of funding secured or unsecured and the funding source(s). If grant funding has been secured from a specific source, it is identified. Projects listed that are necessary to accommodate growth and allow the City to maintain its adopted Levels of Service may be funded in part by transportation impact fees. The costs for projects programmed in the first three years of the TIP have been developed with a higher level of certainty whereas those in the latter three years have been developed with less specificity, as those projects are generally less defined. iv Requirements State law requires that each city develop a local TIP and that it be updated annually (RCW 35.77.010). It represents an important planning component under the State’s Growth Management Act. The TIP may be revised at any time during the year by a majority of the Council, after a Public Hearing. In order to compete for transportation funding grants from Federal and State sources, granting agencies require that projects be included in the TIP. The State’s Safe Routes to School (SRTS) program, for example, requires that potential projects be included in the TIP in order to be eligible for funding. The Six Year TIP is also required to be consistent with the transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan pursuant to RCW 35.77.010. Changes to the TIP The City updated its Comprehensive Plan in 2015. The first six years of the Comprehensive Plan are financially constrained, meaning that secured funding is demonstrated within an approved budget or similarly approved funding action. Subsequently, the 2017-2022 TIP has been revised to reflect projects that will likely be constructed using existing funding sources as well as the City’s historical record of average grant disbursements. Capital Streets Projects that do not have any identified funding sources have been removed from the plan. Projects and programs were reclassified where appropriate. Table 1 Projects Added PROJECT NAME PROJECT TYPE Transportation Master Plan Planning Railroad Quiet Zone for Downtown Urban Center Economic Development 132nd Avenue Walking Path Non-Motorized Meeker Complete Street Redesign Economic Development Willis Street Roundabout Economic Development v Table 2 Projects Removed PROJECT NAME PROJECT TYPE COMMENTS Safe Routes to Schools Improvements at Neely O’Brien Elementary Safety Unfunded Safe Routes to Schools Improvements at Daniel Elementary Safety Unfunded James Street Bicycle Lanes Non-Motorized Unfunded Safe Routes to Schools Improvements at Meadow Ridge Elementary Safety Unfunded Safe Routes to Schools Improvements at Horizon Elementary Safety Unfunded South 212th Street and 72nd Avenue South Intersection Improvement Operations Project reclassified within Street Preservation Program Bicycle System Improvements Program Non-Motorized Program reclassified as projects Community Based Circulating Shuttles Program Transit Program moved to operations budget Quiet Zone for Downtown Urban Center Program Economic Development Program reclassified as project vi Project List Project Project Name Number Project Location and Extent 1. Kent Kangley Road Pedestrian Safety Improvements 104th Avenue Southeast to 124th Avenue Southeast 2. 1st Avenue North Street Improvements Smith Street to James Street 3. South 228th Street/Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation Grade separation crossing at Union Pacific Railroad 4. 72nd Avenue South Extension South 200th Street to South 196th Street 5. Traffic Control Signal System Citywide Project 6. Kent Regional Trails Connector Green River Trail to Interurban Trail at S 218th Street 7. Southeast 208th Street and 108th Avenue Southeast Intersection Improvement Intersection Operations Enhancement 8. Central Avenue South Improvements Green River Bridge to East Willis Street (SR 516) 9. South 224th Street Extension 84th Avenue South to 104th Avenue Southeast (SR 515/Benson Highway) 10. Transportation Master Plan 11. Railroad Quiet Zone for Downtown Urban Center Burlington Northern Santa Fe and Union Pacific Railroads 12. 132nd Avenue Pedestrian Improvements Kent-Kangley Road to Southeast 248th Street 13. Meeker Complete Street Redesign vii Project Project Name Number Project Location and Extent 14. Safe Routes to Schools Improvements at Meridian Elementary Southeast 256th Street and 140th Avenue Southeast 15. 80th Avenue South Improvements South 196th Street to South 188th Street 16. Willis Street and Central Avenue Intersection Improvements Intersection Operations Enhancement 17. 76th Avenue South South 222nd Street to the 22200 block 18. Panther Lake Signal System Integration 19. Willis Street Roundabout Willis Street at 4th Avenue South ONGOING CITYWIDE PROGRAMS 20. Street Preservation Program 21. Traffic Signal Management Program 22. Channelization Improvement Program 23. Sidewalks, Sidewalk Repair and the Americans with Disabilities Act Compliance Program 24. Guardrail and Safety Improvements CITY OF KENT 2017 - 2022 SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COST ESTIMATES No. DESCRIPTION STATUS Project Costs Total Past Future Funded Future Unfunded Phases Total Preliminary Engineering Right of Way Construction Years Total 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 PROJECT TYPE 1 Kent Kangley Pedestrian Safety Improvements Project will be substantially complete in 2016. $ 845,000 840,000$ 5,000$ -$ 845,000$ 154,000$ -$ 691,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Non-Motorized 2 1st Avenue North Street Improvements Project will be substantially complete in 2016. $ 565,000 550,000$ 15,000$ -$ 565,000$ 70,000$ -$ 495,000$ 15,000$ 15,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Mobility 3 South 228th Street/Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation Construction to begin in 2016. $ 25,000,000 1,154,000$ 23,846,000$ -$ 25,000,000$ 3,600,000$ 5,000,000$ 16,400,000$ 23,846,000$ 9,000,000$ 8,000,000$ 6,846,000$ -$ -$ -$ Safety 4 72nd Avenue South Extension Project will be substantially complete in 2016. $ 3,452,500 2,952,500$ 500,000$ -$ 3,452,500$ 417,500$ 35,000$ 3,000,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Capacity 5 Traffic Control Signal System Project will be substantially complete in 2016. $ 397,000 392,000$ 5,000$ -$ 397,000$ 5,000$ -$ 392,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Operations 6 Kent Regional Trails Connector Project will be substantially complete in 2016. $ 1,815,000 1,736,000$ 5,000$ 74,000$ 1,815,000$ 365,000$ 4,000$ 1,446,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Non-Motorized 7 Southeast 208th Street and 108th Avenue Southeast Intersection Improvement Project will be substantially complete in 2016. $ 1,046,000 56,000$ 640,000$ 350,000$ 1,046,000$ 225,000$ 21,000$ 800,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Capacity 8 Central Avenue South Improvements Project will be substantially complete in 2016. $ 6,919,628 6,914,628$ 5,000$ -$ 6,919,628$ 261,885$ -$ 6,657,743$ 5,000$ 5,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Capacity 9 South 224th Street Extension Construction to begin in 2016. $ 29,000,000 3,352,000$ 16,648,000$ 9,000,000$ 29,000,000$ 3,000,000$ 4,000,000$ 22,000,000$ 16,648,000$ 4,162,000$ 4,162,000$ 4,162,000$ 4,162,000$ -$ -$ Capacity 10 Transportation Master Plan Project not yet funded. $ 900,000 -$ -$ 1,100,000$ 900,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,100,000$ 370,000$ 370,000$ 360,000$ -$ -$ -$ Planning 11 Railroad Quiet Zone for Downtown Urban Center Project not yet funded. $ 1,500,000 150,000$ -$ 1,350,000$ 1,500,000$ 220,000$ 80,000$ 1,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Econ Dev 12 132nd Avenue Pedestrian Improvements Contstruction to begin in 2017. $ 1,118,340 -$ 1,118,340$ -$ 1,118,340$ 218,340$ 100,000$ 800,000$ 1,118,340$ 1,118,340$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Non-Motorized 13 Meeker Complete Street Redesign Phase I will be substantially complete in 2016. $ 90,000 90,000$ -$ -$ 90,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Econ Dev 14 Safe Routes to Schools Improvements at Meridian Elementary Project not yet funded. $ 448,000 -$ 50,000$ 398,000$ 448,000$ 65,000$ 83,000$ 300,000$ 50,000$ -$ -$ 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ Safety 15 80th Avenue South Improvements Project not yet funded. $ 7,500,000 -$ -$ 7,500,000$ 7,500,000$ 600,000$ 800,000$ 6,100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Capacity 16 Willis Street and Central Avenue Intersection Improvements Project not yet funded. $ 500,000 -$ 168,000$ 332,000$ 500,000$ 44,000$ 166,000$ 290,000$ 168,000$ -$ -$ 168,000$ -$ -$ -$ Capacity 17 76th Avenue South Project not yet funded. $ 5,000,000 -$ -$ 5,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 500,000$ -$ 4,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Econ Dev 18 Panther Lake Signal System Integration Project not yet funded. $ 342,000 -$ -$ 342,000$ 342,000$ -$ -$ 342,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Operations 19 Willis Street Roundabout Project not yet funded. $ 2,500,000 -$ -$ 2,500,000$ 2,500,000$ 350,000$ -$ 2,150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Econ Dev $ 89,138,468 $ 18,187,128 $ 43,005,340 $ 27,946,000 87,948,468$ 10,095,725$ 10,289,000$ 67,563,743$ 43,515,340$ 15,235,340$ 12,532,000$ 11,586,000$ 4,162,000$ -$ -$ 20 Street Preservation Program N/A $ 74,000,000 N/A $ 36,128,000 $ 37,872,000 74,000,000$ 7,000,000$ -$ 67,000,000$ 36,128,000$ 5,945,000$ 5,971,000$ 5,996,000$ 6,022,000$ 6,022,000$ 6,172,000$ Preservation 21 Traffic Signal Management Program N/A $ 4,200,000 N/A $ - $ 4,200,000 4,200,000$ 600,000$ -$ 3,600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Operations 22 Channelization Improvement Program N/A $ 2,400,000 N/A $ 2,400,000 $ - 2,400,000$ 250,000$ -$ 2,150,000$ 2,400,000$ 400,000$ 400,000$ 400,000$ 400,000$ 400,000$ 400,000$ Operations 23 Sidewalks, Sidewalk Repair and the ADA Compliance Program N/A $ 12,000,000 N/A $ 5,400,000 $ 6,600,000 12,000,000$ 500,000$ 1,000,000$ 10,500,000$ 5,400,000$ 900,000$ 900,000$ 900,000$ 900,000$ 900,000$ 900,000$ Non-Motorized 24 Guardrail and Safety Improvements N/A $ 600,000 N/A $ - $ 600,000 600,000$ 60,000$ -$ 540,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Safety N/A $ 93,200,000 N/A $ 43,928,000 $ 49,272,000 93,200,000$ 8,410,000$ 1,000,000$ 83,790,000$ 43,928,000$ 7,245,000$ 7,271,000$ 7,296,000$ 7,322,000$ 7,322,000$ 7,472,000$ FUTURE FUNDED ELEMENTS BROKEN OUT BY YEAR Total Projects Total Programs PR O G R A M S PHASESPROJECT COSTS PR O J E C T S COST ESTIMATES viii &( &( &( &( &( &( &( &( &( &( &( §¨¦ §¨¦ Covington RentonTukwila Des Moines 18 Auburn FederalWay SeaTac 2 Panther LakeAnnexation 11 14 17 7 Burlington Northern Railroad Union Pacific Railroad B N S F R ailr o a d 4 AVE N 64 AVE S S 212 ST JAMES ST S 2 5 9 P L ORILLIARDS KENT BLACK DIAM OND RD S 188 WAY SE 256 ST 80 AVE S 94 AVE S S 260 ST C O V I N G T O N W A Y S E RUSSELLRD 4 AVE S 37 ST NE S 2 0 8 S TS 208 ST 83 AVE S S 228 ST S 212 WAY W SMITH ST S E 2 4 4 W A Y S 246 ST S 200 ST S 1 9 2 S T S E 281 S T SE 248 ST S 240 ST BENSON RD SE C A N Y O N D R CENTRAL AVE SE 183 ST R EITH RD S 27 2 W A Y SE 200 ST 24 AVE S 83 AVE S SE 27 4 WAY S 223 ST 116 AVE SE S E 2 0 4 W A Y S 200 ST W M E E K E R S T 104 AVE SE SW 43 ST SSTAR LA K E R D EAST VALLEY HWY W O OD M ONT BEACH DR S P E T E R G R U B B R D S E S 196 ST 124 AVE SE 152 AVE SE S 180 ST SE 288 ST 8 0 P L S EAST VALLEY HWY S E C A R R RD S 212 ST 55 AVE S REDONDOBEACHDRS 180 AVE SE 37 ST NW S 2 3 1 Wy S 288 ST S 188 ST SE 208 ST S 272 ST 76 AVE S 148 AVE SE SE 240 ST SE 192 ST 132 AVE SE 124 AVE SE SE 256 ST 164 AVE SE 144 AVE SE MILIT A R Y R D S 116 AVE SE 108 AVE SE SE 240 ST 184 AVE SE D E S MOINESMEMORIAL D R RED ON D O W A Y SE 1 4 8 AVE SE S 200 ST S 216 ST MILITARY RD S S E W A X R D S 277 ST SE 224 ST 108 AVE SE TALBOT RD S 16 AVE S 116 AVE SE 132 AVE SE T H O M A S R D SE COVINGTON-SAWYERRD M A R I NE VIEWDRS SEPETROVITSKYRD 6 4 6 1 9 13 128 11 3 16 30 19 15 STARLAKE LAKEMERIDIAN LAKEFENWICK CLARKLAKE HAM LAKE LAKEJOLIE SHADOWLAKE PANTHERLAKE SHADYLAKE LAKEYOUNGS ANGLELAKE SPRINGLAKE BOW LAKE LAKEDESIRE 5 5 167 99 99 181 515 99 516 516 516 0 0.5 10.25 Mile F Printed May 2016Data Source: City Of Kent GIS, King County GIS City Of KentSix YearTransportation ImprovementProgram Kent Year 2017 Projects Are Shown In Red Year 2018 - 2022 ProjectsAre Shown In Green tran14-1b3.mxd 18 5, 10 20 - 24 Citywide Projects 2017-2022 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1 PROJECT #1: Kent Kangley Pedestrian Safety Improvements 104th Avenue Southeast to 124th Avenue Southeast PROJECT TYPE: Non-Motorized YEAR: 2017 expected completion DESCRIPTION: Improve safety through the construction of engineering improvements combined with education and enforcement. Add a new mid-block pedestrian crossing of Kent Kangley Road with median refuge island and Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons. Restripe crosswalks and stop bars, upgrade pedestrian crossings to countdown message modules and Americans with Disability Accessible (ADA) standard pedestrian push buttons. A total of 24 sidewalk ramps at seven intersections on Kent Kangley between SE 256th Street and 124th Avenue Southeast will be improved by this project and signage consistent with the Manual on Urban Traffic Control Devices will be installed along the entire project length. The project is nearing completion. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering ...... $154,000 Right of Way Acquisition ............... $0 Construction .................... $691,000 TOTAL ............................ $845,000 Funded ............................. $845,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent (General Fund), Transportation Improvement Board, Washington State Department of Transportation Local Programs PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Kent Kangley Road (SR 516) is one of the most densely populated corridors in the City. The section from 104th Ave SE to 124th Ave SE is a congested Principal Arterial with a surrounding mixed-use context. It is also a designated truck route and currently operates at a Level of Service (LOS) E during the PM Peak. The majority of housing along this portion of SR 516 is high-density multifamily that generates a substantial amount of pedestrian traffic. This section of Kent Kangley is a high boarding area for transit and a popular destination for senior citizens due to the high concentration of shopping facilities, banks, medical offices and senior housing. The project area includes two of the highest collision incident 2017-2022 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2 locations in the City (104th Avenue SE at 256th Street and 116th Avenue SE at Kent Kangley Road). The majority of collisions reported in the project area from 2006-2008 occurred during the daylight hours with pedestrians over the age of 18. 2017-2022 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 3 PROJECT #2: 1st Avenue North Street Improvements Smith Street to James Street PROJECT TYPE: Mobility YEAR: 2017 expected completion DESCRIPTION: Complete pedestrian improvements, increase parking and provide electric vehicle charging stations for commuters. Sidewalk, curb, gutter, lighting, street trees, drainage, and parking along the west side of 1st Avenue N between Smith Street and Temperance Street and added parking along the west side of 1st Avenue N between Temperance Street and James Street for a total of 36 added parking spaces in addition to two new electric vehicle charging stations. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering ......... $70,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $0 Construction ..................... $495,000 TOTAL ............................. $565,000 Funded .............................. $565,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent (Business and Occupation Tax), State Regional Mobility Grant PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project will provide additional transit access to support the high parking demand at the Kent Transit Center. The existing surface and structured parking is full by 7AM on weekdays. With the current Sounder schedule, half of the AM northbound commuter trains arrive after 7AM. Commuters that would otherwise choose to ride the bus or train to access other regional centers have to drive instead. This area is heavily used by commuters walking and biking to and from the Sounder Platform, Metro and Sound Transit bus station pullouts. 2017-2022 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 4 PROJECT #3: South 228th Street/Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation Grade Separated crossing at Union Pacific Railroad PROJECT TYPE: Safety YEAR: 2017 - 2019 DESCRIPTION: Construct grade separation of the Union Pacific Railroad mainline tracks at South 228th Street. The project will include the construction of a bridge; four-lane vehicle crossing; full- width paving; concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks; bicycle facilities; street lighting; utilities and appurtenances. Construction is underway, utilities are being relocated. This project has also been added to the Washington State Freight Plan. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering .... $3,600,000 Right of Way Acquisition ... $5,000,000 Construction ................. $16,400,000 TOTAL ........................ $25,000,000 Funded .......................... $25,000,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent (Business and Occupation Tax, Drainage Fund, Local Improvement District, Street Fund, and Water Fund), Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor, Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board, Port of Seattle, Union Pacific Railroad PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The project will lead to a seamless connection between major freight handlers and their primary destinations. It will support freight moving through Kent to the Ports of Seattle and Tacoma, SeaTac Airport and the freeway system. Grade separating this arterial will increase roadway capacity, decrease congestion, enhance safety and improve freight mobility in this corridor and throughout the region. This project will provide regional connections for thousands of businesses, employers, and the 40 million square feet of warehouse/industrial space in the valley. Construction is underway. 2017-2022 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 5 PROJECT #4: 72nd Avenue South Extension South 200th Street to South 196th Street PROJECT TYPE: Capacity YEAR: 2017 expected completion DESCRIPTION: Complete a missing link by constructing a new three-lane roadway from South 200th Street to South 196th Street. The project will include the crossing of Mill Creek and construction of full-width paving; concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, storm drainage, landscaping, utilities and appurtenances. This project is nearing completion. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering ....... $417,500 Right of Way Acquisition ........ $35,000 Construction .................. $3,000,000 TOTAL .......................... $3,452,500 Funded ........................... $3,452,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent (Drainage Fund, Transportation Impact Fee) Regional Fire Authority, Transportation Improvement Board PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Continued development in the northern Kent industrial area, and high levels of congestion along West Valley Highway between the South 180th Street and South 196th Street corridors, mandate additional north-south arterial capacity. This project provides some relief for South 180th Street, South 196th Street, and South 212th Street intersections along West Valley Highway. It also provides improved access to the South 196th Street corridor from industrial development along 72nd Avenue South by constructing the missing link between South 200th Street and South 196th Street. This roadway connection provides a direct link from the existing Fire Station on 72nd Avenue South to the 196th Street grade separated corridor over both the BNSF and UPRR mainline railroad tracks, dramatically improving emergency response times to a large area of the Kent Manufacturing/Industrial Center and warehouse land uses. 2017-2022 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 6 PROJECT #5: Traffic Control Signal System Citywide Project PROJECT TYPE: Operations YEAR: 2017 expected completion DESCRIPTION: Purchase and install a master signal controller unit capable of supporting flashing yellow left turn arrow (FYLTA) displays for permitted left turns. This project will also purchase and install traffic signal controllers for up to 29 individual intersections. Traffic signals will be modified at up to 14 intersections to display FYLTA signal indications for permissive left turn movements. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering ........... $5,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $0 Construction ..................... $392,000 TOTAL ............................. $397,000 Funded .............................. $397,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): Federal Highway Safety Improvement Program PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The current central traffic signal control system is not compatible with flashing yellow left turn arrow displays for permissive left turn movements. This type of signal display has been demonstrated to be much more readily understood by motorists and has resulted in reduced collision rates involving vehicles turning left during permissive left turn signal phases. The upgrade to the legacy central control system and more advanced intersection traffic signal controllers will allow greater operation flexibility and improved transportation system efficiency. 2017-2022 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 7 PROJECT #6: Kent Regional Trails Connector Green River Trail to Interurban Trail at South 218th Street PROJECT TYPE: Non-Motorized YEAR: 2017 expected completion DESCRIPTION: Construct 4,400 foot multi-use trail connecting the Green River and Interurban Regional Trails at a point approximately mid-way between the South 212th Street and South 228th Street Corridors at about South 218th Street in the heart of the Kent Valley. This 12-foot wide multi-use trail for non-motorized users will include trail lighting, in some locations, to enhance visibility and encourage year-round usage. Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons and marked crosswalks will be installed where the new trail crosses midblock at 64th Avenue South and 72nd Avenue South. A traffic signal for pedestrians and bicyclists crossing mid-block will be installed on 68th Avenue South (West Valley HWY). A mechanism for performance monitoring (counting) will be installed at or near the new traffic signal. The project will install a steel pedestrian/bicycle bridge over the Mill Creek between 72nd Avenue South and the Interurban Trail. The project is nearing completion. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering ....... $365,000 Right of Way Acquisition .......... $4,000 Construction .................. $1,446,000 TOTAL .......................... $1,815,000 Funded ........................... $1,741,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent (Drainage Fund, Parks Fund), Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program, Washington State Department of Transportation Local Programs PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This new trail would fill a missing east/west link in the City’s and the region’s bicycle network. It would connect two of the most heavily used regional trails and provide access for tens of thousands of people to a concentrated employment center. It would provide alternative mode access to the Kent Manufacturing/Industrial Center’s 1,800 employers, to recreational activities along the Green River and the Green River Natural Resources Area and improve safety for all users crossing 2017-2022 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 8 three major arterial streets in an area with a heavy mix of truck traffic. 2017-2022 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 9 PROJECT #7: Southeast 208th Street and 108th Avenue Southeast (SR 515/Benson Highway) Intersection Improvement Intersection Operations Enhancements PROJECT TYPE: Capacity YEAR: 2017 expected completion DESCRIPTION: Add a second southbound left storage lane on 108th Avenue SE, widen the receiving lane on SE 208th St, and modify the signal phasing. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering ....... $225,000 Right of Way Acquisition ........ $21,000 Construction ..................... $800,000 TOTAL .......................... $1,046,000 Funded .............................. $696,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): Washington State Department of Transportation (Federal Highway Safety Improvement Program) PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: State Route 515, also known as The Benson Highway or 108th Avenue SE, is the primary north/south route on the East Hill and serves as a major transit route. With four to five lanes in its current configuration, this roadway has been widened to its practical limits. Improvements to intersections along the corridor can have positive effects on corridor congestion and improve efficiency. This project would add queuing capacity for the southbound left turn movement while continuing to provide two lanes of through travel. 2017-2022 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 10 PROJECT #8: Central Avenue South Improvements Green River Bridge to East Willis Street (SR 516) PROJECT TYPE: Capacity YEAR: 2017 expected completion DESCRIPTION: Remove and rehabilitate the existing roadway pavement to add service life to the roadway, between the Green River Bridge and East Willis Street (SR 516). This project will include the removal and replacement of failing pavement sections and a full-width asphalt concrete overlay of the entire roadway. Also included in this project is the selective replacement of curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street trees, as well as minor storm drainage improvements. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering ....... $261,885 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $0 Construction .................. $6,657,743 TOTAL .......................... $6,919,628 Funded ........................... $6,919,628 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent (Business and Occupation Tax, Drainage Fund, Water Fund), Washington Station Department of Transportation (Surface Transportation Program) PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The existing pavement along this section of Central Avenue South is exhibiting signs of distress, as demonstrated by “alligatoring”, longitudinal cracking, and cracking of the curbs and gutters. The service life of this roadway has been reached, necessitating reconstruction of the roadway. The sidewalk system is sub-standard in many locations and in need of replacement. 2017-2022 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 11 PROJECT #9: South 224th Street Extension 84th Avenue South to 104th Avenue Southeast (SR 515/Benson Highway) PROJECT TYPE: Capacity YEAR: 2017 - 2020 DESCRIPTION: Construct a three-lane road from 84th Avenue South to 104th Avenue Southeast (Benson Road) (SR 515), including new bridges over SR 167 and Garrison Creek. The project will include full-width paving; concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks; five foot paved shoulders; street lighting; storm drainage; landscaping; utilities and appurtenances. Construction will begin in 2016. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering .... $3,000,000 Right of Way Acquisition ... $4,000,000 Construction ................. $22,000,000 TOTAL ........................ $29,000,000 Funded .......................... $20,000,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent (Drainage Fund, Local Improvement District, Special Assessments), Developer Mitigation, Transportation Improvement Board PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The existing roadway system cannot accommodate the current or forecast east-west traffic volumes between Kent’s East Hill and the Green River Valley floor. In order to meet transportation concurrency requirements of the Growth Management Act, additional east-west vehicle capacity is required. Intersections along South 208th/212th Street and James/Southeast 240th Streets are also at or over capacity. Because of existing development and topographic constraints, it is not feasible to widen the James/Southeast 240th Street and South 208th/212th Street ‘corridors’ enough to accommodate forecast traffic volumes without additional east-west capacity. 2017-2022 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 12 PROJECT #10: Transportation Master Plan PROJECT TYPE: Planning YEAR: 2017-2019 DESCRIPTION: Major update to the Transportation Master Plan (TMP) including near-term and long range planning of the City’s transportation system needs. Project elements will include consultant contracts for transportation planning, concurrency management, public involvement, travel demand and traffic operations modeling and analysis of potential financing strategies to construct, operate and maintain the City’s transportation network. The current TMP was completed in 2008 and needs to be revised. PROJECT COST: Contractor ........................ $900,000 TOTAL ............................ $900,000 Funded ....................................... $0 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent (General Fund) PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The Kent Transportation Master Plan (TMP), as incorporated into the City’s Comprehensive Plan, is the City’s blueprint for long- range transportation planning in Kent. When the City’s Comprehensive Plan was approved by the Puget Sound Regional Council in 2015, the City deferred an update to the Transportation Master Plan to 2017. This update will include a multi-year transportation financing plan. The plan will also consider subarea and functional plans adopted since 2008 and newly-funded major corridors serving Kent: • Midway Subarea Plan • Downtown Subarea Plan • Federal Way Link Extension • State Route 509 • State Route 167 • Let’s Go Kent • Parks Plan 2017-2022 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 13 PROJECT #11: Railroad Quiet Zone for Downtown Urban Center Burlington Northern Santa Fe and Union Pacific Railroads PROJECT TYPE: Economic Development YEAR: 2017 - 2022 DESCRIPTION: Establish a railroad quiet zone for the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway (BNSF) tracks and the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) tracks through the City of Kent. The grade crossings to be included in the quiet zone on the BNSF railroad mainline are: S 259th Street, Willis Street, Titus Street, Gowe Street, Meeker Street, Smith Street, James Street, and S 212th Street. The grade crossings included in the quiet zone for the UPRR mainline tracks are: Willis Street (SR 516), W Smith Street, W Meeker Street, W James Street, S 228th Street, and S 212th Street. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering ....... $220,000 Right of Way Acquisition ........ $80,000 Construction .................. $1,200,000 TOTAL .......................... $1,500,000 Funded .............................. $150,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent (Business and Occupation Tax), Washington Utilities and Trade Commission PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Locomotive engineers begin sounding the train-mounted horn approximately ¼ mile from the intersection of a highway/railroad crossing. This warning device is an effective deterrent to accidents at grade crossings but exposes the local community to significant levels of noise that affects the quality of life for those living and working closest to the railroad facilities, and can be a barrier to attracting new businesses and residents. 2017-2022 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 14 PROJECT #12: 132nd Avenue Pedestrian Improvements Kent-Kangley Road to Southeast 248th Street PROJECT TYPE: Non-Motorized YEAR: 2017-2022 DESCRIPTION: Construct an asphalt walking path along the west side of 132nd Avenue SE where sidewalk does not currently exist. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering ...... $218,340 Right of Way Acquisition ..... $100,000 Construction .................... $800,000 TOTAL ......................... $1,118,340 Funded .......................... $1,118,340 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent (Street Fund) PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: 132nd Avenue SE is designated as a minor arterial roadway, with 5 vehicle lanes, bicycle lanes, sidewalks and landscaping planned at build-out. This roadway has been widened at various locations based on development of adjacent parcels. Due to budgetary constraints this roadway will not be completed in the near term; however, the desire to improve pedestrian access necessitates moving ahead with the walking path. 2017-2022 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 15 PROJECT #13: Meeker Complete Street Redesign PROJECT TYPE: Economic Development YEAR: 2017-2022 DESCRIPTION: Redesign Meeker Street to improve pedestrian, bicycle and transit user experience, as well as capitalize on visibility through beautification. Phase I of project includes planning and preliminary design, and is already underway. Future phases include advanced design and construction for missing bike connections, reduction in lanes between 6th Avenue and 4th Avenue, reduction in lanes west of Washington Avenue to 64th Avenue, new traffic signal at 6th Avenue, and other street improvements such as pedestrian-scale lighting, planter strips, street trees, and the addition of on-street parking. PROJECT COST: Phase I ............................... $90,000 TOTAL .............................. $90,000 Funded ............................... $90,000 Future Phases ........ To be determined FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent (Placemaking Fund), Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program, Transportation Improvement Board PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project is intended to reimagine the corridor to make it inviting and safe for all users, including pedestrians, bicyclists and transit users (including future bus rapid transit line). The project supports economic and community development goals to strengthen the identity of downtown Kent and to encourage commercial investment. 2017-2022 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 16 PROJECT #14: Safe Routes to Schools Improvements at Meridian Elementary Southeast 256th Street and 140th Avenue Southeast PROJECT TYPE: Safety YEAR: 2018 DESCRIPTION: Install a traffic signal at the intersection of SE 256th Street and 140th Avenue SE and construct an asphalt pavement walkway with an extruded curb along SE 256th Street from approximately 134th Avenue SE to 140th Avenue SE. The traffic signal includes a traffic surveillance camera and interconnect cable to connect this signal to the rest of the City’s traffic control system. This project also includes education and enforcement elements including the purchase of an additional Lidar Radar Unit for the police enforcement. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering ......... $65,000 Education/Enforcement ......... $83,000 Construction ..................... $300,000 TOTAL ............................. $448,000 Funded ................................ $50,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent (School Zone Camera Fund), Washington State Department of Transportation’s Safe Routes to Schools Program PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Meridian Elementary School is located near the intersection of SE 256th Street and 140th Avenue SE. The school provides adult crossing guards to help students cross SE 256th Street. The level of development in the area has increased to the point that local traffic in the neighborhood and in the communities to the east of the school has become especially heavy at the afternoon bell times. A full traffic signal would assist the crossing guards, the school children, the parents and teachers arriving/leaving the school and all the local motorists to maneuver in an orderly way during times of heavy conflict. Currently students must walk or bike along a wide shoulder on SE 256th Street. 2017-2022 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 17 PROJECT #15: 80th Avenue South Improvements South 196th Street to South 188th Street PROJECT TYPE: Capacity YEAR: 2017-2018 DESCRIPTION: Improve 80th Avenue South from South 196th Street to South 188th Street to include sidewalks. The project will include the construction of full width paving; concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; street lighting; and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering ....... $600,000 Right of Way Acquisition ...... $800,000 Construction .................. $6,100,000 TOTAL .......................... $7,500,000 Funded ........................................ $0 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent (Business and Occupation Tax, Storm Utilities Fund), Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Improvement Program, Freight Mobility Systems Improvement Board, Transportation Improvement Board, Surface Transportation Program PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The opening of the 196th Street corridor on the south end of the project and Renton’s completion of Oaksdale Avenue South results in 80th Avenue South being a significant north-south corridor serving the industrial area. Concrete curbs and gutters are required to provide control of roadway drainage and to prevent impacts to adjacent property owners. Sidewalks and street lighting will provide safe access for pedestrians. 2017-2022 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 18 PROJECT #16: Willis Street and Central Avenue Intersection Improvements Intersection Operations Enhancement PROJECT TYPE: Capacity YEAR: 2019 DESCRIPTION: Improve the intersection of Willis Street and Central Avenue to provide a right turn lane from southbound on Central Avenue to westbound Willis Street. Project includes sidewalk, curb and gutter replacement and improvements to traffic signal system. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering ......... $44,000 Right of Way Acquisition ...... $166,000 Construction ..................... $290,000 TOTAL ............................. $500,000 Funded .............................. $168,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent (Transportation Impact Fee), Kent Station Developer Mitigation ($168,000) PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project is a traffic mitigation requirement for additional trips generated by the Kent Station Development. The City of Kent will be implementing this project that was required of and money contributed to it by the developer. The transportation analysis prepared for the ShoWare project assumed construction of this project would be complete. 2017-2022 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 19 PROJECT #17: 76th Avenue South South 222nd Street to the 22200 block PROJECT TYPE: Economic Development YEAR: 2019 DESCRIPTION: Construct drainage and road improvements on 76th Avenue South from South 212th Street to approximately the 22200 block. The project will include raising the existing road; a full width overlay, concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, storm drainage, and channelization. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering ...... $500,000 Right of Way Acquisition ............... $0 Construction ................. $4,500,000 TOTAL ......................... $5,000,000 Funded ....................................... $0 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent (Business and Occupation Tax, Storm Drainage Utility Fund), Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program, Developer Mitigation, Surface Transportation Program, Transportation Improvement Board PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: 76th Avenue South floods several times per year resulting in road closures. The roadway is located in the heart of the City’s Industrial zoned area, which results in heavy truck traffic. Large industrial and manufacturing companies and a large solid waste company that serves several adjacent jurisdictions are located in the immediate vicinity of the project. Road closures negatively impact these businesses and create congestion in other parts of the city as a result of traffic detours around the closure. Improving the road to current standards will also improve traffic flow on 76th Avenue South. 2017-2022 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 20 PROJECT #18: Panther Lake Signal System Integration PROJECT TYPE: Operations YEAR: 2020-2022 DESCRIPTION: This project includes extension of communication cable to traffic signals in the recently annexed area of Panther Lake to allow remote monitoring and management of the traffic signals, replacement of the existing traffic signal controllers to be capable of displaying flashing yellow left turn arrow for permissive left turn movements and allow flexible coordination of the traffic signals along arterial corridors. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering ................. $0 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $0 Construction ..................... $342,000 TOTAL ............................. $342,000 Funded ........................................ $0 FUNDING SOURCE(S): Federal Highway Safety Improvement Program PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The traffic signals in the recently annexed area of Panther Lake are not connected to the City’s central traffic signal control system; hence, they cannot be remotely monitored or managed from the City’s Traffic Management Center. The intersection controllers are not capable of displaying flashing yellow left turn arrow for permissive left turn movements. This type of signal display has been demonstrated to be much more readily understood by motorists and has resulted in reduced collision rates involving vehicles turning left during permissive left turn signal phases. The integration of these signals into the City’s signal system will allow operation flexibility and improved transportation system efficiency. 2017-2022 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 21 PROJECT #19: Willis Street Roundabout Willis Street at 4th Avenue South PROJECT TYPE: Economic Development YEAR: 2021 DESCRIPTION: Construct a roundabout on Willis Street at 4th Avenue South. The project will include the construction of the roundabout, concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, storm drainage, landscaping, utilities and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering ...... $350,000 Right of Way Acquisition ............... $0 Construction ................. $2,150,000 TOTAL ......................... $2,500,000 Funded ....................................... $0 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent (Business and Occupation Tax, Transportation Impact Fees), Washington State Department of Transportation Local Programs PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This gateway project will provide an aesthetically pleasing welcome to commuters into the heart of Kent and provide the typical benefits of a roundabout including: improved safety, improved traffic flow and decreased maintenance costs over the long run. 2017-2022 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 22 PROJECT #20: Street Preservation Program Ongoing Citywide Program PROJECT TYPE: Preservation YEAR: 2017 - 2022 DESCRIPTION: Maintain the existing transportation system by overlaying, rehabilitating, and reconstructing the existing asphalt and concrete streets throughout the City. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering .... $7,000,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $0 Construction ................. $67,000,000 TOTAL ........................ $74,000,000 Funded .......................... $36,128,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent (Business and Occupation Tax, Solid Waste Utility Tax) PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The City assessed the condition of its street network in 2011. It was found that many of the streets exhibit deficiencies that reflect they are beyond their expected performance life and in need of a maintenance or rehabilitation overlay, or some amount of reconstruction. Moreover, historically, the amount of pavement resurfacing, rehabilitation, and reconstruction monies the City has budgeted each year has been insufficient to address the deficiencies of its street network. Insufficient budgets to perform this necessary work results in more expensive maintenance and rehabilitation options. 2017-2022 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 23 PROJECT #21: Traffic Signal Management Program Ongoing Citywide Program PROJECT TYPE: Operations YEAR: 2017 - 2022 DESCRIPTION: Analyze intersections for potential replacement of traffic signals or other traffic control systems to ensure safe and efficient use of the existing and planned transportation network. Analysis of turn movements and collision history will be used to prioritize new traffic signal installations. This program budgets for projects needed to meet the increasing demand for signalized intersection control and the constant need for traffic counts to monitor vehicle volumes and behavior. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering ....... $600,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $0 Construction .................. $3,600,000 TOTAL .......................... $4,200,000 Funded ........................................ $0 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent (Business and Occupation Tax) PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This program also helps the City maintain level of service standards necessary to maintain concurrency as required by the Growth Management Act. 2017-2022 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 24 PROJECT #22: Channelization (Street Markings) Improvement Program Ongoing Citywide Program PROJECT TYPE: Operations YEAR: 2017 - 2022 DESCRIPTION: Provide street marking including striping, thermoplastic pavement marking, and raised pavement markers throughout the City to separate and regulate conflicting movements, define paths of travel, and facilitate safe and orderly movement on City Streets. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering ....... $250,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $0 Construction .................. $2,150,000 TOTAL .......................... $2,400,000 Funded ........................... $2,400,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent (Business and Occupation Tax) PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This ongoing program maintains and updates the channelization throughout the City. The City has 1,648,863 linear feet (LF) of channelization striping, 445,300 raised pavement markings, 22,012 LF of C curb and 7,179 LF of painted C curb. Channelization helps to limit conflict points and directs motorists through areas of complexity. These markings are also used to delineate left turn storage queue areas and deceleration areas for right turning vehicles. This project preserves the capacity and efficiency of the existing roadway system. 2017-2022 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 25 PROJECT #23: Sidewalks, Sidewalk Repair and the Americans with Disabilities Act Compliance Program Ongoing Citywide Program PROJECT TYPE: Non-Motorized YEAR: 2017 - 2022 DESCRIPTION: Systematically construct new sidewalks throughout the City as identified by prioritized project lists in the most recently adopted Transportation Master Plan. Reconstruct and repair existing sidewalks and curb ramps and install new truncated domes and hard-surfaced sidewalks to implement the requirements of the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) consistent with the findings of the Non-motorized Chapter (Chapter 6) of the 2008 Transportation Master Plan. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering ....... $500,000 Right of Way Acquisition ... $1,000,000 Construction ................. $10,500,000 TOTAL ........................ $12,000,000 Funded .......................... $5,400,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent (General Fund), Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project is mandated by Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Title II requires that a public entity must evaluate its services, programs, policies, and practices to determine whether they are in compliance with the nondiscrimination requirements of the ADA. The ADA requires that an ADA Transition Plan be prepared to describe any structural or physical changes required to make programs accessible. The City has conducted a self-evaluation and prepared a Transition Plan including a prioritized list of projects to bring itself into compliance with the Federal ADA regulations. The self-evaluation was conducted in 2005 and needs to be reviewed and updated. This program begins working on that list of projects to construct and repair the City’s sidewalk and street/sidewalk transition zones for accessibility for all users and begins to address the pedestrian improvements identified in the Transportation Master Plan. This project can help achieve 2017-2022 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 26 the City’s goals for improving mobility, reducing vehicle trips, increasing physical activity, and improving transportation connectedness. 2017-2022 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 27 PROJECT #24: Guardrail and Safety Improvements Ongoing Citywide Program PROJECT TYPE: Safety YEAR: 2017 - 2022 DESCRIPTION: Make miscellaneous guardrail improvements each year to enhance motorist safety. Candidate projects include Frager Road, SE 240th/148th Avenue Southeast hillside, Lake Fenwick Road north or S 272nd Street, S 208th/212th and 100th Avenue Southeast. Upgrade existing guardrail end-treatments as mandated by State and Federal regulations. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering ......... $60,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $0 Construction ..................... $540,000 TOTAL ............................. $600,000 Funded ........................................ $0 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent (Business and Occupation Tax), Highway Safety Improvement Program and Hazard Elimination Program PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project is mandated for compliance with Federal and State regulations and the requirement to eliminate potentially hazardous roadway conditions. 28 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2017 – 2022 For more information or additional copies of this document contact: Lacey Jane Wolfe Senior Transportation Planner City of Kent, Public Works, Engineering 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032-5895 253-856-5564 lwolfe@kentwa.gov This page intentionally left blank. Agenda Item: Public Hearing – 5B_ TO: City Council DATE: June 21, 2016 SUBJECT: Surplus of Utility Equipment and Materials – Public Hearing SUMMARY: Through daily operations, the utility maintenance crews accumulate used copper and brass fittings, pipe, wiring, and water meters. Of these accumulations, approximately 4,000 pounds of copper and brass have a monetary value when recycled. Many of the water components have lead levels that no longer meet federal safety standards. Staff proposes that these surplus materials be sold to local scrap metal vendors. In addition, our SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) system has been upgraded over the last few years and the back-up generators have been replaced with diesel powered units that are more reliable and maintain a longer running time than the obsolete propane generators. Staff proposes that the surplus generators and ancillary equipment (propane tanks & transfer switch) be sent to an auction house for sale. RCW 35.94.040 requires that the city council hold a public hearing and adopt a resolution to declare public utility equipment as surplus and to establish the condition for disposition of the equipment that is in the best public interest. The public hearing will be held this evening. A resolution affirming the sale of the property will be submitted for council consideration at a future council meeting. EXHIBITS: 1) 4/28/16 Letter from Steve Craigue 2) 5/10/16 Email from Steve Craigue 3) List of Surplus Items RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee YEA: Ralph, Fincher, Higgins NAY: BUDGET IMPACTS: MOTION: No action required. A Resolution will be presented to council at a future council meeting. This page intentionally left blank. Utility Materials Surplus -2016 April 28, 2016 To all concerned, The following is a brief explanation as to why we are disposing of the attached list of materials. The items that are marked “lead,” are brass Water department fittings that contain lead. The Reduction of Lead in Drinking Water Act, enacted on January 4th, 2011, became effective on January 4th, 2014. This Act bans the use of any brass fittings that contain lead, since 1/4/2014. To be in compliance, we had to remove these items from the inventory. These items have been replaced with no lead, (or low lead) fittings that meet the requirements of the Act. The items that are marked “obsolete”, are no longer being used, or have been replaced with less costly, more usable inventory. Some items are missing parts, that are no longer available. The large diameter ductile iron pipe, (damaged) is out-of-round, from being stacked on itself for thirty- plus years, and is no longer usable. The generators, propane tanks, and transfer switch, have been replaced with newer diesel powered units that have longer run times. There has also been some damage to the wiring (by rodents), making repairs not economical. As in the past, these items will be disposed of in the best interest of the City. This may be by auction, or through the bid process with the scrap dealers. Steve Craigue Warehouse Supervisor This page intentionally left blank. This page intentionally left blank. ITEMS TO SURPLUS 2015 PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS No.QUANTITY PART NUMBER DESCRIPTION VALUE REASON 1 13 SEN/SR411 1" Water Meter $122.17 Lead 2 9 SEN/SR7 2" Water Meter $470.74 Lead 3 3 CAL/CIT1 4" CIT Calder Coupling $7.76 Obsolete 4 1 CAL/AC1 4" AC Calder Coupling $6.91 Obsolete 5 1 CAL/AC2 6" AC Calder Coupling $5.31 Obsolete 6 1 CAL/AC3 8" AC Calder Coupling $21.31 Obsolete 7 7 CAL/CLAY1 4" Clay Calder Coupling $7.70 Obsolete 8 2 CAL/CLAY2 6" Clay Calder Coupling $17.76 Obsolete 9 1 CAL/CLAY 21 6" x 4" Clay Calder Coupling $10.12 Obsolete 10 1 CAL/CLAY3 8" Clay Calder Coupling $24.26 Obsolete 11 2 CAL/D1 4" AC x PVC Bushing $3.95 Obsolete 12 6 CAL/J1 4" Clay x PVC Bushing $4.66 Obsolete 13 2 CAL/J2 6" Clay x PVC Bushing $12.59 Obsolete 14 2 FER/C09 4" x 3" PVC x PVC Fernco Coupling $7.75 Obsolete 15 2 FER/CLBSP2 6" Clay Bell x PVC Bushing $7.42 Obsolete 16 1 FER/COBP3 8" Concrete Bell x PVC Bushing $11.27 Obsolete 17 1 RO/TGMSDR351 4" MJ x 3034 PVC Transition Gasket $7.03 Obsolete 18 1 RI/940LS 940 Valve Box Lid (Sewer)$5.96 Obsolete 19 3 ROC/4311392 Flex Coupling ACX AC [13.92]$140.26 Obsolete 20 1 ROC/4311421 Flex Coupling ACX AC [14.21]$140.26 Obsolete 21 3 RO/SS2145112 Repair Band FC Romac [13.71-14.51 x 12"]$116.47 Obsolete 22 2 RO/SS2145116 Repair Band FC Romac [13.71-14.51 x 16"]$116.47 Obsolete 23 7 SBF/169C62 Elbow, Male [3/8" x 1/8"]$0.92 Lead 24 5 SBF/169C64 Elbow, Male [3/8" x 1/4"]$1.90 Lead 25 7 SBF/169C66 Elbow, Male [3/8" x 3/8 "]$2.40 Lead 26 14 SBF/169C86 Elbow, Male [1/2" x 3/8"]$3.34 Lead 27 9 SBF/68C42 Connector, Male [1/4" x 1/8"]$0.92 Lead 28 6 SBF/68C62 Connector, Male [3/8" x 1/8"]$0.71 Lead 29 16 SBF/68C64 Connector, Male [3/8" x 1/4"]$1.27 Lead 30 20 SBF/68C66 Connector, Male [3/8" x 3/8"]$1.56 Lead 31 18 SBF/68C44 Connector, Male [1/4" x 1/4"]$1.22 Lead 32 9 SBF/60C4 Sleeve, Brass [1/4"]$0.04 Lead 33 17 SBF/60C8 Sleeve, Brass [1/2"]$0.25 Lead 34 14 SBF/60C6 Sleeve, Brass [3/8"]$0.10 Lead ITEMS TO SURPLUS 2015 PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS No.QUANTITY PART NUMBER DESCRIPTION VALUE REASON 35 8 SBF/68C68 Connector, Male [3/8" x 1/2"]$2.45 Lead 36 18 SBF/68C86 Connector, Male [1/2" x 3/8"]$2.13 Lead 37 6 SBF/68C88 Connector, Male [1/2" x 1/2"]$2.79 Lead 38 20 SBF/61C4 Tube Nut [1/4"]$0.14 Lead 39 9 SBF/164C6 Tee, Union [3/8"]$3.76 Lead 40 7 SBF/164C8 Tee, Union [1/2"]$2.64 Lead 41 6 SBF/164C4 Tee, Union [1/4"]$2.00 Lead 42 20 SBF/61C8 Tee Nut [1/2"]$0.87 Lead 43 16 SBF/61C6 Tube Nut [3/8"]$0.22 Lead 44 12 SBF/165C4 Elbow, Union [1/4"]$0.97 Lead 45 8 SBF/165C8 Elbow, Union [1/2"]$5.50 Lead 46 12 SBF/165C6 Elbow, Union [3/8"]$2.93 Lead 47 11 SBF/62C6 Comp Union [3/8"]$1.86 Lead 48 9 SBF/62C4 Comp Union [1/4"]$1.33 Lead 49 9 SBF/62C8 Comp Union [1/2"]$3.53 Lead 50 6 SBV/BV1 Ball Valve, Brass FIPT [1/2"]$12.20 Lead 51 6 SBV/BVQ Ball Valve, Brass FIPT [1/4"]$10.12 Lead 52 15 SBF/169C42 Elbow, Male [1/4" x 1/8"]$1.24 Lead 53 11 SBF/169C46 Elbow, Male [1/4" x 3/8"]$3.15 Lead 54 19 SBF/169C44 Elbow, Male [1/4" x 1/4"]$1.55 Lead 55 10 SBF/66C44 Connector, Female [1/4" x 1/4"]$0.82 Lead 56 9 SBF/66C66 Connector, Female [3/8" x 3/8"]$2.81 Lead 57 5 SBF/66C64 Connector, Female [3/8" x 1/4"]$1.30 Lead 58 9 SBF/66C42 Connector, Female [1/4" x 1/8"]$1.04 Lead 59 1 ROC/226745X7 Repair Band $53.92 Obsolete 60 1 ROC/SS21434X15 Repair Band $210.17 Obsolete 61 1 DR/3601142X10 Repair Band $74.91 Obsolete 62 3 MU/220600X3 Repair Band $10.60 Obsolete 63 2 CA/3110540X3 Repair Band $10.69 Obsolete 64 1 RO/1010450X3 Saddle $24.26 Obsolete 65 1 CA/CSC10365X3 Repair Band $14.50 Obsolete 66 1 CA/CSC10365X4 Repair Band $14.50 Obsolete 67 1 GF/RR0250 24" x 1/4" 250# Gasket $29.95 Damaged 68 1 IP/5236 36" x 18' Ductile Iron Pipe $1,116.00 Damaged 69 1 IP/5236RJ 36" x 18' Ductile Iron Pipe - Restrained Joint $755.28 Damaged ITEMS TO SURPLUS 2015 PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS No.QUANTITY PART NUMBER DESCRIPTION VALUE REASON 70 2 IP/5230 30" x 18' Ductile Iron Pipe $736.20 Damaged 71 1 IP/520RJ 24" x 20' Ductile Iron Pipe - Restrained Joint $400.00 Damaged 72 8 SBF/211P2 1/8" Brass Plug $0.50 Lead 73 4 SBF/211P4 1/4" Brass Plug $1.36 Lead 74 6 SBF/211P6 3/8" Brass Plug $2.00 Lead 75 3 SBF/211P8 1/2" Brass Plug $2.99 Lead 76 11 SBF/48F44 1/4" Flare x MIPT Adapter $1.24 Lead 77 9 SBF/48F64 3/8" x 1/4" Flare x MIPT Adapter $1.37 Lead 78 18 SBF/48F66 3/8" Flare x MIPT Adapter $1.80 Lead 79 11 SBF/48F86 1/2" x 3/8" Flare x MIPT Adapter $2.51 Lead 80 12 SBF/48F88 1/2" Flare x MIPT Adapter $2.76 Lead 81 12 SBF/41FS4 1/4" Flare Nut $0.90 Lead 82 12 SBF/41FS6 3/8" Flare Nut $1.56 Lead 83 10 SBF/41FS8 1/2" Flare Nut $2.13 Lead 84 6 SBF/209P42 1/4" x 1/8" Bushing $1.32 Lead 85 6 SBF/209P62 3/8" x 1/8" Bushing $2.18 Lead 86 3 SBF/209P82 1/2" x 1/8" Bushing $2.01 Lead 87 3 SBF/209P86 1/2" x 3/8" Bushing $2.20 Lead 88 8 SBF/209P124 3/4" x 1/4" Bushing $3.72 Lead 89 10 SBF/209P126 3/4" x 3/8" Bushing $3.65 Lead 90 8 SBF/209P128 3/4" x 1/2" Bushing $4.08 Lead 91 15 SBF/249F44 1/4" Flare x MIPT 90 $0.85 Lead 92 7 SBF/249F66 3/8" Flare x MIPT 90 $2.90 Lead 93 4 SBF/UQ 1/4" Union $9.80 Lead 94 3 SBF/UT 3/8" Union $9.87 Lead 95 2 SBF/U1 1/2" Union $13.10 Lead 96 10 SBF/LQ 1/4" 90 Bend $3.09 Lead 97 8 SBF/LT 3/8" 90 Bend $4.49 Lead 98 6 SBF/L1 1/2" 90 Bend $4.44 Lead 99 6 SBF/XQ 1/4" Cross $7.57 Lead 100 6 SBF/XT 3/8" Cross $7.47 Lead 101 8 SBF/X1 1/2" Cross $6.58 Lead 102 5 SBF/TQ 1/4" Tee $5.74 Lead 103 4 SBF/TT 3/8" Tee $5.07 Lead 104 2 SBF/T1 1/2" Tee $7.03 Lead ITEMS TO SURPLUS 2015 PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS No.QUANTITY PART NUMBER DESCRIPTION VALUE REASON 105 4 SBF/R31 3/4" x 1/2" Bell Reducer $6.81 Lead 106 4 SBF/R3T 3/4" x 3/8" Bell Reducer $5.42 Lead 107 2 SBF/R3Q 3/4" x 1/4" Bell Reducer $7.29 Lead 108 2 SBF/R1T 1/2" x 3/8" Bell Reducer $5.45 Lead 109 1 SBF/R1Q 1/2" x 1/4" Bell Reducer $4.78 Lead 110 4 SBF/RTQ 3/8" x 1/4" Bell Reducer $3.39 Lead 111 5 SB/5211 1/2" Galv. Compression Cplg.$1.00 Obsolete 112 4 RO/7023 3/4" Galv. Compression Cplg.$10.18 Obsolete 113 11 SB/5214 1" Galv. Compression Cplg.$4.55 Obsolete 114 4 SB/5224 1" Galv. Compression Cplg.$4.55 Obsolete 115 4 RO/7024 1" Galv. Compression Cplg.$14.37 Obsolete 116 7 RO/7026 1-1/2" Galv. Compression Cplg.$20.76 Obsolete 117 7 SB/411105 3/4" Repair Coupling $3.00 Obsolete 118 5 SB/411132 1" Repair Coupling $3.05 Obsolete 119 4 RO/SC17X3 1-1/4" x 3" Repair Band $4.03 Obsolete 120 5 RO/SC19X3 1-1/2" x 3" Repair Band $8.40 Obsolete 121 1 MH/IVBG9 3" Valve Body Gasket $3.00 Obsolete 122 2 MH/IVBG7 16" Valve Body Gasket $4.50 Obsolete 123 1 GF/T000 4" Galvanized Tee $1.60 Obsolete 124 3 FO/C1466 1-1/2" CTS PJ x FIPT Coupling $17.67 Lead 125 4 FO/C1477 2" CTS PJ x FIPT Coupling $25.00 Lead 126 1 FO/C4466 1-1/2" CTS PJ x CTS PJ Coupling $17.62 Lead 127 3 FO/C4477 2" CTS PJ x CTS PJ Coupling $23.84 Lead 128 1 GF/RR0 24" x 1/8" Flange Gasket $15.35 Damaged 129 3 MIL/IVSC2 6" Spring Check Valve $378.00 Obsolete 130 4 FT/B10DBCRL Concrete Meter Box $37.00 Damaged 131 2 FO/C1666 1-1/2" PE PJ x FIPT Cplg $52.08 Lead 132 1 FO/C1677 2" PE PJ x FIPT Cplg.$99.97 Lead 133 5 FO/C4433 3/4" CTS PJ x CTS PJ Cplg.$16.84 Lead 134 1 FO/C4444 1" CTS PJ x CTS PJ Cplg.$19.81 Lead 135 24 FO/C4533 3/4" CTS PJ x CTS GALV. PJ Cplg.$10.48 Lead 136 7 FO/C4544 1" CTS PJ x Galv. PJ Cplg.$17.85 Lead 137 3 FO/C4633 3/4" CTS PJ x PE PJ Cplg.$18.66 Lead 138 6 FO/C4644 1" CTS PJ x PE PJ Cplg.$24.48 Lead 139 6 FO/C6633 3/4" PE PJ x PE PJ Cplg.$19.41 Lead ITEMS TO SURPLUS 2015 PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS No.QUANTITY PART NUMBER DESCRIPTION VALUE REASON 140 2 FO/C6644 1" PE PJ x PE PJ Cplg.$43.30 Lead 141 9 FO/C6666 1-1/2" PE PJ x PE PJ Cplg.$50.64 Lead 142 2 FO/C6677 2" PE PJ x PE PJ Cplg.$84.33 Lead 143 6 FO/C8434 1" x 3/4" CTS PJ x MIPT Cplg.$12.14 Lead 144 7 FO/C8444 1" CTS PJ x MIPT Cplg.$13.87 Lead 145 6 FO/C8633 3/4" PE PJ x MIPT Cplg.$17.59 Lead 146 5 FO/C8466 1-1/2" CTS PJ x MIPT Cplg.$13.57 Lead 147 1 FO/C8477 2" CTS PJ x MIPT Cplg.$22.75 Lead 148 2 FO/C8644 1" PE PJ x MIPT Cplg.$28.64 Lead 149 4 FO/C8666 1-1/2" PE PJ x MIPT Cplg.$52.84 Lead 150 7 FO/B11444 1" FIPT x FIPT Ball Valve $58.06 Lead 151 7 FO/F4003 3/4" CC x MIPT Corp. Stop $21.23 Lead 152 3 FO/F4004 1" CC x MIPT Corp. Stop $36.38 Lead 153 9 FO/F5003 3/4" MIPT x MIPT Corp. Stop $21.97 Lead 154 3 FO/F5004 1" MIPT x MIPT Corp. Stop $47.78 Lead 155 8 FO/FB5004 1" MIPT x MIPT Corp. Stop $43.19 Lead 156 4 FO/FB5006 1-1/2" MIPT X MIPT Ball Corp. Stop $90.93 Lead 157 2 FO/FB5007 2" MIPT x MIPT Ball Corp. Stop $198.37 Lead 158 7 FO/C0133 3/4" Flair x FIPT Cplg.$8.71 Lead 159 8 FO/C0144 1" Flair x FIPT Cplg.$12.98 Lead 160 10 FO/C0433 3/4" Flair x CTS PJ Cplg.$13.64 Lead 161 4 FO/C0444 1" Flair x CTS PJ Cplg.$22.47 Lead 162 7 FO/C1433 3/4" CTS PJ x FIPT Cplg.$15.18 Lead 163 5 FO/C1444 1" CTS PJ x FIPT Cplg.$17.16 Lead 164 11 FO/C1633 3/4" PE PJ x FIPT Cplg.$12.99 Lead 165 5 FO/A24 Meter Adapter $23.24 Lead 166 2 FO/A46 Meter Adapter $139.53 Lead 167 2 FO/A47 Meter Adapter $125.16 Lead 168 5 FO/C38232 Meter Adapter $8.29 Lead 169 6 FO/C38442625 Meter Adapter $12.18 Lead 170 6 FO/HA31323 Meter Check Valve $29.72 Lead 171 8 FO/HA31444 Meter Check Valve $30.04 Lead 172 4 FO/HFA31777 Meter Check Valve $179.00 Lead 173 8 FO/HA34323 Meter Check Valve $35.16 Lead 174 7 FO/HA34444 Meter Check Valve $35.04 Lead ITEMS TO SURPLUS 2015 PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS No.QUANTITY PART NUMBER DESCRIPTION VALUE REASON 175 2 FO/VH427W Meter Resetter $102.12 Lead 176 3 FO/VH429W Meter Resetter $109.23 Lead 177 2 FO/VH4410W Meter Resetter $162.49 Lead 178 3 FO/VH4412W Meter Resetter $139.22 Lead 179 1 FO/VH7215W Meter Setter $110.60 Lead 180 7 FO/VH7415W Meter Setter $161.11 Lead 181 4 FO/KV13444W Meter Stop $36.86 Lead 182 1 FO/FV13777W Meter Stop $203.09 Lead 183 7 FO/KV43444W Meter Stop $41.42 Lead 184 2 WIL/600LU3 3/4" Pressure Reducing Valve $118.24 Lead 185 4 WIL/600LU4 1" Pressure Reducing Valve $123.06 Lead 186 4 BF/C3 3/4" Brass Cplg.$10.23 Lead 187 6 BF/C4 1" Brass Cplg.$14.61 Lead 188 2 BF/C6 1-1/2" Brass Cplg.$34.10 Lead 189 4 BF/C7 2" Brass Cplg.$62.34 Lead 190 6 BF/P3 3/4" Brass Plug $5.48 Lead 191 6 BF/P4 1" Brass Plug $9.79 Lead 192 4 BF/P6 1-1/2" Brass Plug $19.14 Lead 193 8 BF/P7 2" Brass Plug $29.15 Lead 194 13 MU/P3 3/4" Mueller Plug $13.32 Lead 195 9 MU/P4 1" Mueller Plug $0.26 Lead 196 6 BF/T444 1" Brass Tee $23.03 Lead 197 2 BF/T555 1-1/4" Brass Tee $23.85 Lead 198 2 BF/T666 1-1/2" Brass Tee $52.52 Lead 199 3 BF/T777 2" Brass Tee $79.51 Lead 200 4 BF/U33 3/4" Brass Union $26.78 Lead 201 4 BF/U44 1" Brass Union $54.53 Lead 202 6 BF/U77 2" Brass Union $129.03 Lead 203 2 BF/R76 2" x 1-1/2" Brass Bell Reducer $72.22 Lead 204 4 BF/R65 1-1/2" x 1-1/4" Brass Bell Reducer $35.55 Lead 205 5 BF/R64 1-1/2" x 1" Brass Bell Reducer $44.41 Lead 206 2 BF/R43 1" x 3/4" Brass Bell Reducer $20.76 Lead 207 2 BF/K66 1-1/2" Brass 45 Bend $45.29 Lead 208 2 BF/L77 2" Brass 45 Bend $51.49 Lead 209 8 BF/L33 3/4" Brass 90 Bend $11.08 Lead ITEMS TO SURPLUS 2015 PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS No.QUANTITY PART NUMBER DESCRIPTION VALUE REASON 210 8 BF/L44 1" Brass 90 Bend $17.34 Lead 211 8 BF/L55 1-1/4" Brass 90 Bend $8.47 Lead 212 5 BF/L66 1-1/2" Brass 90 Bend $34.09 Lead 213 4 BF/L77 2" Brass Bend $51.49 Lead 214 5 BF/S44 1" Brass 90 Street Bend $26.57 Lead 215 4 BF/S66 1-1/2" Brass 90 Street Bend $46.33 Lead 216 3 BF/S77 2" Brass 90 Street Bend $70.36 Lead 217 6 BF/B76 2" x 1-1/2" Brass Bushing $27.98 Lead 218 3 BF/B74 2" x 1" Brass Bushing $31.70 Lead 219 4 BF/B73 2" x 3/4" Brass Bushing $28.95 Lead 220 4 BF/B64 1-1/2" x 1" Brass Bushing $22.78 Lead 221 3 BF/B63 1-1/2" x 3/4" Brass Bushing $24.51 Lead 222 8 BF/B54 1-1/4" x 4" Brass Bushing $18.17 Lead 223 7 BF/B43 1" x 3/4" Brass Bushing $8.87 Lead 224 2 250 gallon propane tanks $200.00 Replaced 225 1 RS12000 Onan Generator S/N:B068892272 164.3 hours $700.00 Replaced 226 1 RS12000 Onan Generator S/N:A068870206 117.7 hours $700.00 Replaced 227 1 Onan 60 Onan Generator S/N: A910366269 no hour meter $1,500.00 Replaced 228 1 Onan 7.5 Onan Generator S/N: D870883555 no hour meter $150.00 Replaced 229 1 Onan Transfer Switch S/N:G860829937 1185.5 hours $200.00 Replaced 230 2 crates Scrap (used) water meters, 5/8" thru 4"$2,500.00 Replaced 231 1 crate Scrap (used) copper tube, brass fittings $1,500.00 Replaced 232 2 crates Scrap (used) wire and cable $500.00 Replaced 233 4 ea Scrap (used) 8" Hersey Meters $800.00 Replaced This page intentionally left blank. PUBLIC COMMENT This page intentionally left blank. Agenda Item: Consent Calendar 7A & 7B_ CONSENT CALENDAR 7. City Council Action: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds to approve Consent Calendar Items A through L. Discussion Action 7A. Approval of Minutes. Approval of the minutes of the regular council meeting of April 5, 2016. 7B. Approval of Bills: Approval of payment of the bills received through May 15 and paid on May 15 after auditing by the Operations Committee on June 7, 2016. Approval of checks issued for vouchers: Date Check Numbers Amount 5/15/2016 Wire Transfers 6662 - 6684 $2,262,141.26 5/15/2016 Regular Checks 703477 - 703822 $1,551,137.61 Void Checks 5/15/2016 Use Tax Payable $3,105.91 $3,816,384.78 Approval of checks issued for payroll for May 1 through May 15 and paid on May 20, 2016: Date Check Numbers Amount 5/20/2016 Checks $0.00 Voids and Reissues 5/20/2016 Advices 366782 - 367686 $1,503,340.20 $1,503,340.20 This page intentionally left blank. Kent City Council Meeting Minutes April 5, 2016 The regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Cooke. Councilmembers present: Boyce, Berrios, Budell, Fincher, Higgins, Ralph, and Thomas. CHANGES TO THE AGENDA FROM COUNCIL ADMINISTRATION OR STAFF. Remove 9B Kent Regional Trails Connector PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A. Historical Note from Kent’s 125th Anniversary – Shari Sayre, longtime member of Kent Historical society gave a presentation on the early days of mail delivery to Kent. The first federally funded post office was located in 1940 on W. Gowe and 1st; the post office was expanded in 1964. In 1975 the current post office was built on 2nd and Gowe, which was sold in the last couple of years, however, the post office; will continue to lease part of the building. B. Public Recognition – Councilmember Ralph gave a shout out to Kentridge High School’s Robotics Team.. Mayor Cooke wanted to give a shout out to the T-birds for the great job they are doing. C. Appointments to the Human Services Commission – Council confirmed the appointment of Shatha Abbas and Zenovia Harris to the Human Services Commission for three year terms. D. Reappointment of Pauline Thomas to the Civil Service Commission – Council confirmed reappointment of Pauline Thomas to the Civil Service Commission for an additional six-year term. Pauline has served on the Civil Service Commission for 12 years. E. Proclamation for Sexual Assault Awareness Month – No one present at meeting to accept proclamation. Mayor commented that this is not a routine matter like other crimes that can happen anywhere. Police detectives are so well trained to apprehend sex predators, no one in Kent should have tolerance for sexual assault. F. Earth Day Proclamation – Jeff Watling, Parks Director accepted the proclamation and noted that Saturday April 16th will be the 18th year celebrating Earth Day. G. Sikh Heritage Day Proclamation – Ms. Sautwinder accepted the proclamation on behalf of the Sikh community, beginning of Harvest Season on April 14, 2016. There will be a parade and prayer at the ShoWare Center on May 21, 2016. Ms. Sautwinder said there are 500,000 members of the Sikh religion in the United States, with 25,000 members in the State of Washington, it is the fifth largest religion in the world. Kent City Council Meeting Minutes April 5, 2016 H. Community Events – Council President Boyce congratulated the T-Birds for their first division title on Friday against the Silvertips. Saturday the Seattle Mist will play arena football at 8:00 p.m. at the ShoWare Center. Kent Chamber of Commerce Leadership Awards will be May 6th, May 9th and May 13th ; May 28th will be ladies night out. On June 4th the International Festival will take place at the ShoWare Center. I. Economic and Community Development Report – Ben Wolters, Director of Economic and Community Development said REI who has been in Kent for 18 years is moving to the Spring District in Bellevue, they have run out of room at their current location at 228th and West Valley Highway. Key factors for the move REI is looking for better transportation and connectivity. Last quarter increase up 22% from last years activity in permits, many commercial, some single family homes, builders buying buildable lots 6-8 months ahead of time. I. Intergovernmental Reports – Council President Boyce serves on SCA and PIC and attended a networking dinner with Senator Hobbs. Larry Springer participated in round table talks about the process, Mayor Bacus starting a mentoring program. Marina Hanson also attended the dinner to get better start for kids, gather input how we can connect to community; provide list of agencies for help, gathering input and feedback April 7th Highline Community Center and April 27th at Kent Community Center; May 3rd Northgate Community Center. PUBLIC HEARING – None. PUBLIC COMMENT Jacob Dreifus - Pine Tree Park is sale is withdrawn another offer might come along and buy $800,000 property save parks Idea to have citizens defend park from development would be willing to keep park maintained by citizen committee. Logan Evans– Spent $87.23 for 32 gallon trash can and lock on the eastside and did trash pickup. He is willing to do maintenance to save the city money. Improve infrastructure for who lives here now. Amanda Elmer – Pine Tree Park is where she grew up. The park is important to the kids, and is extremely important to the people willing to help. CONSENT CALENDAR Council President Boyce moved to approve Consent Calendar items A through S, seconded by Councilmember Thomas. Motion carried 7-0. A. Approval of Minutes – Approve. Minutes of the regular council meeting of February 16, 2016 were approved. B. Approval of Bills – Approve. Bills received through February 29 and paid on February 29 after auditing by the Operations Committee on March 15, 2016. Approval of checks issued for vouchers: 2 Kent City Council Meeting Minutes April 5, 2016 Date Check Numbers Amount 2/29/2016 Wire Transfers 6569 - 6585 $1,792,061.99 2/29/2016 Regular Checks 701113 - 701525 $2,987,646.36 Void Checks ($2,125.60) 2/29/2016 Use Tax Payable $10,182.07 $4,787,764.82 Approval of checks issued for payroll for February 16 through February 29 and paid on March 4, 2016: Date Check Numbers Amount 3/4/2016 Checks $0.00 Voids and Reissues 3/4/2016 Advices 362500 - 363312 $1,415,928.28 $1,415,928.28 C. Appointments to the Human Services Commission – Confirm. Council confirmed the Mayor’s appointment of Shatha Abbas and Zenovia Harris to the Kent Human Services Commission for three year terms. D. Reappointment of Pauline Thomas to the Civil Service Commission – Confirm. Council confirmed the Mayor’s reappointment of Pauline Thomas to the Civil Service Commission for an additional six-year term. E. Construction Agreement with Puget Sound Energy for S. 228th Street Grade Separation Transmission Relocation – Authorize. The Mayor was authorized to sign a Facility Relocation/Modification Agreement with Puget Sound Energy in an amount not to exceed $1,579,286.00 to raise their transmission facilities for the 228th Street Union Pacific Grade Separation project, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public Works Director. F. Consultant Services Agreement with Tierra Right of Way Services, Ltd. For S. 228th St. UPRR Grade Separation Project – Authorize. The Mayor was authorized to sign a Consultant Services Agreement with Tierra Right of Way Services, Ltd. in an amount not to exceed $71,200.00 to provide Property Negotiation Services for the South 228th Street Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation project, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public Works Director. G. Schedule 74 Design Agreement with Puget Sound Energy for the 228th Street Railroad Grade Separation Project – Authorize. The Mayor was authorized to sign the Puget Sound Energy Schedule 74 Design Agreement for the South 228th Street/Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation Project in the amount of $36,300 subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public Works Director. H. 2015 Asphalt Overlays – Accept as Complete. The Mayor was authorized to accept the 2015 Asphalt Overlay project as complete and release retainage to ICON Materials Inc., upon receipt of standard releases from the state and the release of any liens. 3 Kent City Council Meeting Minutes April 5, 2016 I. Guiberson Reservoir Joint Sealing Project – Accept as Complete. The Mayor was authorized to accept the Guiberson Reservoir Joint Sealing project as complete and release retainage to Northwest Linings & Geotextile Products, Inc. upon receipt of standard releases from the state and the release of any liens. J. 2016 City Art Plan and Five Year City Art Plan 2016-2020 – Approve. Council approved the 2016 City Art Plan and Five year Plan. K. First Amendment to 2015 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan – Approve. Council approved the First Amendment to the 2015 Annual Action Plan and authorized the Mayor to submit the amendment to HUD. L. First Amendment to the 2016 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan – Approve. Council approved the First Amendment to the 2016 Annual Action Plan and authorized the Mayor to submit the amendment to HUD. M. Kent Senior Center Lunch Program Food Services Agreement – Authorize. The Mayor was authorized to sign the Dietary Management Services Agreement with Consolidated Food Management, Inc. in the amount of $119,170 for the Kent Senior Activity Center lunch program, subject to terms and conditions acceptable to the Parks Director and City Attorney. N. Consultant Services Agreement with ARC Architects for the City Hall Space Efficiency Plan Phase II – Authorize. The Mayor was authorized to sign all documents necessary to enter into an AIA Agreement with ARC Architects in an amount not to exceed $168,364.00 for the City Hall Space Efficiency Plan - Phase II, subject to terms and conditions acceptable to the Parks Director and the City Attorney. O. Genesis Marketing Agreement – Authorize. The Mayor was authorized to sign a consultant services agreement with Genesis Marketing not to exceed $70,000, for a term of 6 months, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney. P. Garrison Glen Bill of Sale – Accept. Council accepted the Bill of Sale for Garrison Glen Plat. For: sanitary sewers, including 10 manholes and 948 linear feet of 8-inch PVC pipe; new streets, including 2,280 linear feet of curb, gutter, sidewalk and paving; frontage improvements including 425 linear feet of lights, trees and landscaping; storm sewers including 1,575 linear feet of 12-24 inch CPEP storm pipe, along with 5 manholes and 30 catch basins. Q. Kent Auburn Water Conveyance System Bill of Sale – Accept. Council accepted the Bill of Sale for Kent/Auburn Conveyance System for 3 watermains and 185 linear feet of Class 52 8-inch diameter ductile iron pipe waterline. R. Parriott Final Plat – Approve. Council approved the final plat map for the Parriot Plat and authorized the Mayor to sign the final plat map. S. Briscoe-Desimone Levee Improvements Reach I – Accept as Complete. The Mayor was authorized to accept the Briscoe-Desimone Levee Improvements Reach I 4 Kent City Council Meeting Minutes April 5, 2016 project as complete and release retainage to Tapani, Inc., upon receipt of standard releases from the state and the release of any liens. OTHER BUSINESS – None. BIDS – None. A. Riverbend Well – Award. Councilmember Fincher moved to award the Riverbend Irrigation Well Project to Charon Drilling, Inc. in the amount of $135,106.00 and authorized the Mayor to sign all necessary documents, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Parks Director, seconded by Councilmember Higgins. Motion carried 7-0. B. Kent Regional Trails Connector – Award. - Removed from the agenda. C. 2016 Asphalt Overlay Project – Award. Councilmember Higgins moved to award the 2016 Asphalt Grinding Project to Puget Paving & Construction Inc. in the amount of $ 62,790.00 and authorized the Mayor to sign all necessary documents, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public Works Director, seconded by Councilmember Ralph. Motion carried 7-0. REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES, STAFF AND SPECIAL COMMITTEES A. Council President. – Council President Boyce commented on the presentation by Lacey Jane Wolfe on crosswalk safety during the council workshop. He wants to see Kent as a safe place and is looking at other cities to see what they are doing. Public Works is working on crosswalk safety policies within the city. At our February retreat we set a goal to make enhancements to the 2012 Strategic Plan, the plan is working well however, the council would like to make improvements and enhancements. A. Mayor. – Mayor Cooke reiterated regarding this initiative passed by the King County Voters last November the initiative is to work on the Best Starts for Kids, asking the public to be involved in the community conversation. The first conversation will be at Birch Street Park community center on April 27th, beginning at 6:30 p.m. These conversations will determine how the dollars should be spent. The Mayor spoke about attending the Puget Sound Regional Council annual meeting (PSRC) where they recognized State Representative Judy Clibborn for her years of service working on and finessing a transportation package which was adopted. Kudos out to our April Employee of the Month, Melanie Robinson. Melanie works as a Detective and Public Information Officer to protect life and property in Kent. She enforces our laws and Ordinances of Kent. She was recognized by her peers for all the amazing work she does. 5 Kent City Council Meeting Minutes April 5, 2016 Met with King County Accessor John Wilson have information I have asked for this to be sent to me by email so it can be forwarded to you. The medium value in Kent residential tax changes for 2015-2016 went up 7.7%. The tax rate went down 1.7%, but the taxes increased due to voter improved initiatives for both Best Starts for Kids and the new emergency communication radio program. Mayor Cooke spoke about working with King County Board of Supervisors for the flood control as it relates to the Milwaukee II Levy. The County rejected the (ILA) Interlocal Agreement I had a real problem with the terminology at the heading of Exhibit A. this Levy is located at the south part of the city recognized by the green river south of 259 between the tracks. Very thankful Board of Supervisors Dunn and Upthegrove removed from the agenda, it was ready to be passed on June 6th, that is the Milwaukee II Levy. B. Chief Administrative Officer. – Chief Administrative Officer, Derek Matheson communicated that his report is in the packet and there will be an executive session to discuss potential litigation lasting about 30 minutes. C. Economic & Community Development Committee. – Council President Boyce commented that Ben Wolters did a good job. D. Operations Committee. – Councilmember Ralph mentioned the three items on Operations Committee agenda. The first item was the use of drug forfeiture funds of to support education outreach and enforcement especially working with our youths. Committee was supportive of this however the vote was deferred to the next meeting as more information was requested. The second item was the Regional Fire Authority agreement working with the city on the completion of 72nd street connect to allow access to business in the industrial area, help businesses more direct access to middle of the valley they are contributing one million dollars to this project, which will repaid over a number of years. The third item was the 2016 bond refunding that should save the City $7-7.5 million dollars. The committee agreed to move forward. F. Parks and Human Services Committee. – Councilmember Fincher spoke about the five year Art Plan. This included the discussion of expenditures such as caring for the art we have, purchasing artwork and the Do it Yourself (DIY) website. Human Services grant applications are well underway; Earth Day at Morrow Meadow Parks Saturday 9to noon. Parks Commission update, may move the meeting to the third Thursday. G. Public Safety Committee. – No report. H. Public Works Committee. – Councilmember Higgins spoke about taking a deeper dive into our sewers, including the rates and the capital needs of our sewer system. Looking at what the rates support, lift station reports, have work to do need to figure out the proper maintenance of our sewer systems, will keep you posted. 6 Kent City Council Meeting Minutes April 5, 2016 I. Regional Fire Authority. – Councilmember Thomas spoke about the longevity awards ceremony of firefighters and said he was truly amazed at the longevity of firefighters. The next meeting will be on May 20 at 5:30 p.m. at station 78. EXECUTIVE SESSION A. Potential Litigation, as per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) Executive Session 8:30 P.M.; Return after Executive 9:38 P.M. ACTION AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION Councilmember Ralph spoke about the vote and said it will likely make people angry. She will be voting against $800,000 for mistakes that were made by staff, she believes the Council acted on their opinions. Councilmember Barrios – Everyone on March 1st did not want to sell park other issues concerning not supporting sale of park. Accountability of fund of $800,000 has turned out to be a lack of trust. Looking at right now conversation with people Oakpointe did everything right when buying property appreciate working with us, Public has done a good job supporting this. Commend council going through this process many issues council needed to work through not happy to use B&O money. Councilmember Thomas spoke about spending months to come to possible resolutions. He read a fortune from a fortune cookie, saying “don’t let others stop you from doing what’s right”. He spoke about how difficult it was to make a decision. Council President Boyce moved to authorize the Mayor to sign a settlement agreement and all necessary related documents between the City of Kent and Oakpointe LLC, Oakpointe Holdings LLC, and Pine Tree Park, providing for the return of $150,000 earnest money, payment of $759,968.50, authorization for a contingent right of first refusal for the property commonly referred to as the East Hill Shops property, and release of all claims by the parties, subject to approval of final terms and conditions by the City Attorney. Seconded by Councilmember Fincher. Motion carried 5-2. Roll call vote: Councilmember Berrios; Fincher; Budell and Higgins, yay. Councilmembers Ralph and Thomas, nay. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:56 p.m. Sue Hanson Acting City Clerk 7 This page intentionally left blank. Agenda Item: Consent Calendar – 7C_ TO: City Council DATE: June 21, 2016 SUBJECT: Appointment to Kent Arts Commission – Confirm SUMMARY: Confirm appointment of Christina Caravaglio to the Kent Arts Commission to fill a vacant position - term expiring October 1, 2017. Christina is a Panther Lake area resident who is a community arts advocate. She serves as chair of the Kent Downtown Partnership’s art committee that provides us with Kent’s Third Thursday Art Walk and also serves on the South King County Cultural Coalition (SoCo). Christina has served as the art docent coordinator for Glenridge Elementary School and was president of the Glenridge PTA. Christina has a Bachelor of Fine Arts from Alfred University in New York. I am pleased she chooses to apply her passion for the arts in serving the public through the Kent Arts Commission. RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor Suzette Cooke BUDGET IMPACTS: None MOTION: Confirm appointment of Christina Caravaglio to the Kent Arts Commission filling a vacant position - term expiring October 1, 2017. This page intentionally left blank. Agenda Item: Consent Calendar – 7D_ TO: City Council DATE: June 21, 2016 SUBJECT: Amendment to Consultant Services Agreement with KBA, Inc. for Central Ave S. Construction Management Project – Authorize SUMMARY: The Central Avenue South Pavement Preservation and Utility Improvements Project is located on Central Avenue South between Willis Street and the Green River Bridge. This federally funded project will be completed soon. In the summer of 2015, the City entered into an agreement with KBA, Inc. to manage the project’s construction. This contract amendment will provide KBA with funding to cover additional costs incurred for subconsultants and to manage the balance of the construction project. In addition, this amendment will provide KBA with the funding needed to prepare for, and successfully pass, the Project Management Review (PMR) Audit that is forthcoming from WSDOT’s Local Programs Office and required by the project’s Federal Funding. EXHIBITS: WSDOT Supplemental Agreement No. 3 RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee YEA: Ralph, Fincher, Higgins NAY: BUDGET IMPACTS: Funding for this contract amendment will come from existing project funds. MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to sign an amendment to the agreement with KBA Inc., in an amount not to exceed $77,000, to provide additional construction management services for the Central Avenue S. Project, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public Works Director. This page intentionally left blank. Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the number of calendar days for completion of the work to read: Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read: DOT Form 140-063 EF Revised 9/2005 If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the appropriate spaces below and return to this office for final action. By: Consultant Signature By: I Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows: Suzette Cooke, Mayor Supplemental Agreement Number Organization and Address Project Number Description of Work KBA, Inc. 11201 SE 8th St., Suite 160 Bellevue, WA 98004 Additional budget needed to continue to provide Construction Management services for the project. For a description, see Exhibit A which is attached and incorporated by this reference. All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement. and executed on The Local Agency of desires to supplement the agreement entered into with No change. No change. Increase of $77,000 to cover an overrun in cost. 666,836.00 as set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and by this reference made a part of this supplement. Central Ave. S. Pavement Preservation & Utility Project Title New Maximum Amount Payable Original Agreement Number LA 8224 (425) 455-9720Phone: the City of Kent KBA, Inc. 8/10/2015 LA 8224and identified as Agreement No. $ The changes to the agreement are described as follows: II III Approving Authority Signature 3 Date 8/10/2015 9/1/2016 Execution Date Completion Date EXHIBIT A    As we discussed at our May 5 meeting at your office, our request for additional budget is based on the  following bulleted items:    When we originally estimated the project duration we anticipated being on the project for roughly 9  months.  Additionally, our estimate did not include any contingency, salary increases, or added time for  weather days or days added by change order.  Our average anticipated monthly burn rate was just over  $60K.    It now looks like the project will take approximately 11 months to complete.  Based on calculations we  made at our May 5 meeting, we agreed that it looked like roughly $105K is needed to account for the  additional time.  It is also noted that the majority of the waterline inspection was done by a City  inspector.  This resulted in a decrease to KBA invoices for approximately two months and resulted in a  savings in consultant costs to the City of approximately $25K ($105K ‐ $80K) – the amount of the  increase we originally requested).     Other things to consider that resulted in our request:  Staheli overran their inspection budget for the  CIPP liner and Terracon has a minor overrun in materials testing.    In conclusion, a summary of our request boils down to:     Weather days   11 change order days added   Suspension of work while we wait for a paving weather window   Additional suspension of work anticipated for the roadway cure time before channelization can  be applied    I also note that our request allows for very little slippage in the remaining work.    I appreciate the opportunity to provide additional support for our request.  If you need any additional  information please let me know.    Regards,    Sam      Sam Schuyler   D 425.214.5076  |  C 425.772‐9729     KBA, Inc.     This page intentionally left blank. Agenda Item: Consent Calendar – 7E_ TO: City Council DATE: June 21, 2016 SUBJECT: Change Order with Peterson Brothers, Inc. for 2016 Guardrail Repairs – Authorize SUMMARY: Since awarding the guardrail repair contract to Peterson Brothers, Inc. on April 19, 2016, guardrails have been damaged by errant vehicles at three additional locations. It is imperative to have repairs made as soon as possible. Peterson Brothers is willing to perform the additional work at the unit bid prices. Additional Locations: • 72nd Ave @ S 262nd St (outside curve); • SE 240th St about 500 ft. east of 144th Ave SE; and • Frager Rd S @ Meeker St (southeast corner) Staff is pursuing restitution at two of these locations. The original contract amount with Peterson Brothers is $80,689.22 and the additional work completed through this Change Order will increase the overall contract amount to $117,787.95. EXHIBITS: None RECOMMENDED BY: The Public Works Committee YEA: Fincher, Ralph, Higgins NAY: BUDGET IMPACTS: Additional work will exceed the awarded contract amount by more than 10%. The additional funds will come from currently budgeted Business & Occupation tax revenue. MOTION: Authorize Mayor to sign a construction Change Order with Peterson Brothers, Inc., in the amount of $37,098.73, to repair recently damaged guardrail, subject to the final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public Works Director. This page intentionally left blank. Agenda Item: Consent Calendar – 7F_ TO: City Council DATE: June 21, 2016 SUBJECT: Amendment to the Consultant Services Agreement with AECOM for Upper Mill Creek Dam Improvements – Authorize SUMMARY: The Upper Mill Creek Dam Improvements Project will provide flood risk reduction to the Kent Valley. When complete, the improvements will significantly reduce flood risk to the Downtown Business District, including Kent Station, James Street, Smith Street, and Central Avenue areas. The improvements to the dam’s diversion structure will also open Upper Mill Creek to re-habitation by salmon. The City previously entered into an agreement with the URS Corporation (URS) to design these improvements. The URS Corporation has since merged with the AECOM Technology Corporation (AECOM). A new contract with AECOM advanced the design to the point that permit applications could be finalized and submitted. This contract amendment with AECOM will complete the project’s design, with construction scheduled to start in 2017. EXHIBITS: 1) AECOM Amendment 2) Scope of Work 3) Fee Proposal RECOMMENDED BY: The Public Works Committee YEA: Ralph, Fincher, Higgins NAY: BUDGET IMPACTS: Funding for this contract amendment will come from already budgeted drainage utility funds and grants from the King County Flood Control District. MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to sign an Amendment to the Consultant Services Agreement with AECOM Technology Corporation in an amount not to exceed $159,966.98, for additional design services related to the Upper Mill Creek Dam Project, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public Works Director. This page intentionally left blank. AMENDMENT - 1 OF 2 AMENDMENT NO. 1 NAME OF CONSULTANT OR VENDOR: AECOM CONTRACT NAME & PROJECT NUMBER: Upper Mill Creek Dam ORIGINAL AGREEMENT DATE: September 11, 2015 This Amendment is made between the City and the above-referenced Consultant or Vendor and amends the original Agreement and all prior Amendments. All other provisions of the original Agreement or prior Amendments not inconsistent with this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect. For valuable consideration and by mutual consent of the parties, Consultant or Vendor’s work is modified as follows: 1. Section I of the Agreement, entitled “Description of Work,” is hereby modified to add additional work or revise existing work as follows: In addition to work required under the original Agreement and any prior Amendments, the Consultant or Vendor shall: Provide final design, preparation of contract documents, respond to regulatory comments and continued permit support for the project. 2. The contract amount and time for performance provisions of Section II “Time of Completion,” and Section III, “Compensation,” are modified as follows: Original Contract Sum, including applicable WSST $64,127.36 Net Change by Previous Amendments including applicable WSST $0 Current Contract Amount including all previous amendments $64,127.36 Current Amendment Sum $159,966.98 Applicable WSST Tax on this Amendment $0 Revised Contract Sum $224,094.54 AMENDMENT - 2 OF 2 Original Time for Completion (insert date) 12/31/16 Revised Time for Completion under prior Amendments (insert date) n/a Add’l Days Required (±) for this Amendment 365 calendar days Revised Time for Completion (insert date) 12/31/17 The Consultant or Vendor accepts all requirements of this Amendment by signing below, by its signature waives any protest or claim it may have regarding this Amendment, and acknowledges and accepts that this Amendment constitutes full payment and final settlement of all claims of any kind or nature arising from or connected with any work either covered or affected by this Amendment, including, without limitation, claims related to contract time, contract acceleration, onsite or home office overhead, or lost profits. This Amendment, unless otherwise provided, does not relieve the Consultant or Vendor from strict compliance with the guarantee and warranty provisions of the original Agreement. All acts consistent with the authority of the Agreement, previous Amendments (if any), and this Amendment, prior to the effective date of this Amendment, are hereby ratified and affirmed, and the terms of the Agreement, previous Amendments (if any), and this Amendment shall be deemed to have applied. The parties whose names appear below swear under penalty of perjury that they are authorized to enter into this Amendment, which is binding on the parties of this contract. IN WITNESS, the parties below have executed this Amendment, which will become effective on the last date written below. CONSULTANT/VENDOR: By: (signature) Print Name: Its (title) DATE: CITY OF KENT: By: (signature) Print Name: Suzette Cooke Its Mayor (title) DATE: APPROVED AS TO FORM: (applicable if Mayor’s signature required) Kent Law Department AECOM - Upper Mill Creek Dam Amd 1/Lincoln EXHIBIT A Agenda Item: Consent Calendar – 7G_ TO: City Council DATE: June 21, 2016 SUBJECT: King County Flood Control District Sub-Regional Opportunity Fund for Upper Mill Creek Dam Improvements Project – Authorize SUMMARY: The King County Flood Control District (District) collects an annual levy from properties within King County. Through the District’s Sub-Regional Opportunity Fund, ten percent of the levy collected within each jurisdiction is granted back to the jurisdiction to be used for stormwater or habitat projects. The City has requested its portion of the Opportunity Fund be directed to the Upper Mill Creek Dam Project in the amount of $191,079. Approval is needed by our City Council to accept these funds for the project and establish a budget. The Upper Mill Creek Dam Project is scheduled for construction in 2017. EXHIBITS: 2016 Sub-Regional Opportunity Fund Application Packet RECOMMENDED BY: The Public Works Committee YEA: Fincher, Ralph, Higgins NAY: BUDGET IMPACTS: The Opportunity Fund will be used to reimburse previous design expenses on the project. MOTION: Accept $191,079 from the King County Flood Control District Sub- Regional Opportunity Fund for the Upper Mill Creek Dam Project, establish a budget for the funds to be spent within this project, and authorize the Mayor to sign all documents necessary for the City to receive these funds, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public Works Director. This page intentionally left blank. Agenda Item: Consent Calendar – 7H_ TO: City Council DATE: June 21, 2016 SUBJECT: Connecting WA Grant for S. 228th Street Union Pacific Grade Separation Project - Authorize SUMMARY: This project will provide a roadway overpass over the top of the Union Pacific Railroad tracks and Interurban Trail on the Puget Sound Energy right- of-way. In October of 2015, the City received notice that this project received funding through the Connect Washington Program authorized by the legislature, in the amount of $15 million. $13 million is available in the 2015–2017 biennium. The additional $2 million will be available in the 2017– 2019, biennium pending enacting legislation. The funds will be administered through WSDOT Local Programs who also administer the federal funding. Acceptance and obligation of state funds will be authorized using Supplements to a Local Agency Agreement currently in place with WSDOT. EXHIBITS: Funding Letter dated October 9, 2015 from WSDOT RECOMMENDED BY: The Public Works Committee YEA: Ralph, Fincher, Higgins NAY: BUDGET IMPACTS: Provides full funding for the project. MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary agreements with the Washington State Department of Transportation to obligate $15 million of Connect Washington funds for expenditure on the South 228th Street Union Pacific Grade Separation Project, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public Works Director. This page intentionally left blank. Agenda Item: Consent Calendar – 7I_ TO: City Council DATE: June 21, 2016 SUBJECT: Interlocal Agreement with King County Flood Control District for the Milwaukee II Levee Project – Authorize SUMMARY: The Milwaukee II levee is a part of the Horseshoe Bend Levee that spans between 3rd Avenue South and the Union Pacific railroad embankment. The area is above the 100 year flood elevation but needs additional freeboard in order to accredit the adjacent levee and the levees downstream along the right bank of the Green River. The Flood Control District has allocated funding to Kent for this project to make offers to purchase property and construct levee improvements. This Interlocal Agreement (ILA) will allow the City to proceed with an Alternatives Analysis and acquire property for the levee project. A future ILA will be required to design and construct levee improvements. The ILA was approved by the King County Flood Control District Board of Supervisors on May 23, 2016. EXHIBITS: Interlocal Agreement RECOMMENDED BY: The Public Works Committee YEA: Fincher, Ralph, Higgins NAY: BUDGET IMPACTS: The City will be reimbursed by the Flood Control District in accordance with the ILA. MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to sign an Interlocal Agreement with the King County Flood Control District for the Milwaukee II Levee project, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public Works Director. This page intentionally left blank. 482198.5 | 361395 | 0001 -1- AGREEMENT REGARDING ALTERNATIVES AND PROPERTY ACQUISITION Milwaukee II Levee Improvement Project River Mile 24.04 to 24.25, Right Bank THIS AGREEMENT REGARDING ALTERNATIVES AND PROPERTY ACQUISITION (“Agreement”) relating to the Milwaukee II Levee, River Mile 24.04 to 24.25, Right Bank, is entered into on the last date signed below by and between the CITY OF KENT, a Washington municipal corporation (“City”), and KING COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL ZONE DISTRICT, a quasi-municipal corporation of the State of Washington (“District”) (collectively, the "Parties"). RECITALS A. King County, Washington, through the Water and Land Resources Division of the King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks, as service provider to the District pursuant to an interlocal agreement with the District, operates and maintains a major portion of the Green River levee system. B. The Milwaukee II Levee (“Levee”) is a key part of the Green River levee system. The District desires to improve the Levee to provide improved flood protection and scour protection, to enable certification and secure necessary land rights (the Levee improvement will hereafter be referred to as the “Project”). The area of the Project is the right bank of the Green River from River Mile 24.04 to 24.25. C. The District has included the Project in its CIP and budget, in a total amount of $8,500,000. The Parties believe that the estimated cost and expense of planning, design, property acquisition and construction of the Project will not exceed this total amount. The City has agreed to construct the Project, in order to provide for the safety of residents and businesses that are protected by the Levee. The Parties desire to construct the Project as soon as possible, with a goal of construction in 2017. D. The preliminary plan for the Project is to increase the height of the Levee to achieve the Lower Green River System-Wide Improvement Framework’s provisional flood protection goal of 500-year or 18,800 cfs, plus three feet of freeboard. Before determining the final plan for the Project, the Parties desire to prepare an analysis and study of design and construction alternatives for the Project, and select a preferred alternative for recommendation to the District. The Parties further intend that after the District selects a design for the Project, the Parties will negotiate and enter into an Agreement regarding design and construction of the Project. 482198.5 | 361395 | 0001 -2- E. By Resolution No. FCD2015-07.2, adopted on July 13, 2015, the District determined that the flood control improvements included in the Resolution generally contribute to the objectives of the District’s comprehensive plan of development. In that Resolution, the District also approved funding for the Project. AGREEMENT The Parties agree as follows: 1. Incorporation of Recitals—Scope of Agreement. All recitals above are hereby incorporated in and ratified as part of this Agreement. This Agreement establishes the terms and conditions for preparation of an analysis and study of design and construction alternatives for the Project, selection of a preferred alternative, selection of a final design, and acquisition of necessary property interests for the Project . 2. Preparation of Study of Alternatives--Selection of Preferred Alternative. a. After consultation with the District, the City shall select a consultant to prepare an analysis and study of alternatives for the Project (“Study”), as described below. Prior to entering into an agreement with the consultant, the City shall provide the proposed agreement to the District, including the scope of work. The City shall pay the consultant, and the District shall reimburse the City for such payments pursuant to section 4 below. b. Prior to commencement of the Study, the City shall provide to the District a schedule for preparation and completion of the Study. The Study shall include, but not be limited to, the following: i. A charter (project goals, objectives and process) for the Project substantially similar to the charter provided for in the King County Water and Land Resources Division Project Management Manual. ii. An analysis of at least two and perhaps three design and construction alternatives for the Project, which consider flood protection, toe/scour protection and certification, and which include, but not be limited to, alignment and location of any floodwall and a comparison of the cost, benefits and impacts of an earthen levee versus a floodwall. iii. Criteria for analyzing, comparing and ranking each Alternative. iv. A conceptual level cost estimate to relocate South 259th Street landward from the riverbank, and to install salmon habitat structures and features in the Project. c. The Study shall assume that the maximum Project cost is $8,500,000. 482198.5 | 361395 | 0001 -3- d. Upon completion of a draft Study, the City shall provide a copy of the draft Study to the District for review and comment. After District approval of the draft Study, either as prepared by the City or as amended after review and comment by the District, the City shall prepare the final Study. Based on the final Study, the Parties shall rank the Alternatives using the criteria, and recommend a preferred Alternative to the District. The District shall select the Alternative that will be used in the design of the Project. The City shall not commence design of the Project until the District has selected a design and has authorized the City to proceed. 3. Acquisition and Transfer of Property Interests. a. During this Agreement, the City is authorized to acquire property interests that are necessary for the Project under the preliminary plan for the Project, in accordance with the terms and conditions of this section. These property interests are set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein. b. The property interests acquired by the City shall provide for ownership, construction, installation, operation, maintenance, repair, replacement and removal of the Project. If the property interest is an easement, the City shall use either the form of the standard River Protection Easement in Reference 8P to the King County Surface Water Design Manual, or a different form of River Protection Easement approved by the District. If the property interest is other than an easement, the City shall use a form of property interest document approved by the District. c. Prior to execution or acceptance of any property interest document, the City shall consult with the District Executive Director or designee. d. In acquiring the real property interests, the City shall comply with all applicable state and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to the following: i. Washington State Department of Transportation Right of Way Manual (M26.01.06). ii. Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations. iii. Chapters 8.04 and 8.25 RCW. iv. Chapter 8.26 RCW and Chapter 365-24 WAC. v. Chapter 8.140 RCW and Chapter 308-125 WAC. e. The District shall reimburse the City for its costs and expenses of acquiring the property interests pursuant to section 4 below. f. The City shall take title to the right-of-way of South 259 Street between the Union Pacific railroad and the east right-of-way edge of South 3rd Avenue. 482198.5 | 361395 | 0001 -4- 4. Reimbursement of City Expenditures. a. The maximum reimbursement for costs and expenses incurred by the City for the Study and property interest acquisitions pursuant to this Agreement shall be $3,650,000. b. No more than once a month, the City shall submit requests for reimbursement of City costs and expenses incurred on or after the effective date of this Agreement pursuant to sections 2 and 3 above; provided, that for costs and expenses incurred pursuant to section 3 above (property interests), the City shall not submit, and the District shall not consider, any requests for reimbursement until the City has executed or accepted a property interest document in accordance with section 3 above. The requests shall be in a form and shall contain information and data as required by the District. In connection with submittal of requests for reimbursement, the District may require the City to provide a status or progress report concerning the Study or the acquisition of property interests. c. The District shall review the requests to confirm that they are reimbursable and payable under this Agreement. The District shall endeavor to complete such review within thirty (30) days of receipt of a request in order to determine whether they are reimbursable and payable under this Agreement. The District shall forward the approved reimbursement to the City within forty-five (45) days of the City’s request. d. The District may postpone review of a City request for reimbursement where all or any part of the request is inaccurate or incomplete. The District shall notify the City of any inaccuracies or incompleteness within thirty (30) days of receipt of the request. The City shall provide all additional information or data within thirty (30) days of the District’s request for such additional information or data. If the request is still inaccurate or incomplete in the opinion of the District, the dispute shall be resolved in accordance with section 6 below. After resolution of the dispute, the District shall provide reimbursement as provided in this section 4. e. The District may postpone payment of any request for reimbursement, up to a maximum of five percent (5%) of the request, where the City is delinquent in submittal, preparation or completion of any document or work required by this Agreement. 5. Duration—Effective Date. This Agreement shall take effect on the date on which the second party signs this Agreement, and shall remain in effect until the District selects a preferred Alternative or the Parties execute a design and construction Agreement, whichever occurs first. 482198.5 | 361395 | 0001 -5- 6. Dispute Resolution. The Parties will seek to resolve any disputes under this Agreement as follows: a. For disputes involving cost and expense reimbursements or payments, as provided for in section 4 above, submittal of all relevant information and data to an independent Certified Public Accountant or a Construction Claims Consultant, if agreed upon by the Parties, for a non-binding opinion as to the responsibility. b. If the foregoing does not result in resolution and for all other disputes, the Parties may mutually select any informal means of resolution and resort will otherwise be had to the Superior Court for King County, Washington. c. Each Party will be responsible for its own costs and attorney’s fees in connection with the dispute resolution provisions of this section 6. 7. Third Parties. This Agreement and any activities authorized hereunder shall not be construed as granting any rights or privileges to any third person or entity, or as a guarantee or warranty of protection from flooding or flood damage to any person, entity or property, and nothing contained herein shall be construed as waiving any immunity to liability to the City, the District or King County, granted under state statute, including Chapters 86.12 and 86.15 RCW, or as otherwise granted or provided for by law. 8. Liens and Encumbrances. The City acknowledges and agrees that it will not cause or allow any lien or encumbrance arising from or related to this Agreement to be placed upon the real property interests of King County or the District. If such lien or encumbrance is so placed, King County or the District shall have the right to remove such lien and charge back the costs of such removal to the City. 9. Indemnification. To the maximum extent permitted by law, the City shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the District and King County, and all of their officials, employees, principals and agents, from any and all claims, demands, suits, actions, losses, costs, reasonable attorney fees and expenses, fines, penalties and liability of any kind, including injuries to persons or damages to property, arising out of, or as a consequence of, the Project, the Study or this Agreement. As to all other obligations under this Agreement, to the maximum extent permitted by law, each Party shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other Party, and all of its officials, employees, principals and agents, from any and all claims, demands, suits, actions, fines, penalties and liability of any kind, including injuries to persons or damages to property, arising out of or relating to any negligent acts, errors or omissions of the indemnifying Party and its contractors, agents, employees and representatives in performing these obligations under this Agreement. However, if any such damages and injuries to persons or property are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of the District or its contractors, employees, agents, or representatives, and the City or its contractor or employees, agents, or representatives, each Party’s obligation hereunder applies only to the extent of the negligence of such Party or its 482198.5 | 361395 | 0001 -6- contractor or employees, agents, or representatives. This indemnification provision shall not be construed as waiving any immunity granted to the City, the District, or King County, under state statute, including chapters 86.12 and 86.15 RCW, as to any other entity. The foregoing indemnity is specifically and expressly intended to constitute a waiver of each Party’s immunity under industrial insurance, Title 51 RCW, as respects the other Party only, and only to the extent necessary to provide the indemnified Party with a full and complete indemnity of claims made by the indemnitor’s employees. This waiver has been mutually negotiated. 10. Insurance. Each Party recognizes that the other is self-insured and accepts such coverage for liability arising under this Agreement. Should any Party choose not to self-insure, that Party shall maintain and keep in full force and effect a policy of general liability insurance in an amount not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence with an additional excess liability policy of not less than Ten Million Dollars ($10,000,000) and will provide the other Party with a certificate of insurance and additional insured endorsement that will name the other Party as an additional insured. 11. Entire Agreement; Amendment. This Agreement, together with Exhibit A, represents a full recitation of the rights and responsibilities of the Parties and may be modified only in writing and upon the consent of both Parties. Should any conflict exist between the terms of this Agreement and the terms of Exhibit A, this Agreement shall control. 12. Binding Nature. The rights and duties contained in this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and are binding upon the Parties and their respective successors in interest and assigns. 13. Notices, Communications and Documents. Unless applicable law requires a different method of giving notice, any and all notices, demands or other communications required or desired to be given hereunder by either Party (collectively, "notices") shall be in writing and shall be validly given or made to the other Party if delivered either personally or by Federal Express or other overnight delivery service of recognized standing, or if deposited in the United States Mail, certified, registered, or express mail with postage prepaid, or if sent by electronic mail. If such notice is personally delivered, it shall be conclusively deemed given at the time of such delivery. If such notice is delivered by Federal Express or other overnight delivery service of recognized standing, it shall be deemed given one business day after the deposit thereof with such delivery service. If such notice is mailed as provided herein, such shall be deemed given three business days after the deposit thereof in the United States Mail. If such notice is sent by electronic mail, it shall be deemed given at the time of the sender's transmission of the electronic mail communication, unless the sender receives a response that the electronic mail message was undeliverable. Each such notice shall be deemed given only if properly addressed to the Party to whom such notice is to be given as follows: 482198.5 | 361395 | 0001 -7- To City: Tim LaPorte, Public Works Director 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 Phone: (253)856-5500 Email: tlaporte@KentWA.gov To District: Kjristine Lund, Executive Director 516 Third Avenue, Room 1200, W-1201 Seattle, WA 98104 Phone: (206) 477-2985 Email: Kjris.Lund@kingcounty.gov Any Party may change its address for the purpose of receiving notices as herein provided by a written notice given in the manner aforesaid to the other Party. 14. Authority. The undersigned warrant that they have the authority duly granted by their respective legislative bodies to make and execute this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement, which shall become effective on the last date signed below. CITY OF KENT KING COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL ZONE DISTRICT By: By: Suzette Cooke Reagan Dunn Its: Mayor Its: Board Chair DATE:__________________________ DATE:_________________________ APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: By: Assistant City Attorney Legal Counsel 482198.5 | 361395 | 0001 -8- EXHIBIT A Property Interests that May be Acquired by City of Kent V&S Properties and Investment Tax Parcel Number: 000660-0017 Parcel A: Beginning at a point on the east line of the Cavanaugh Tract and the south line of county road which is 810.48 feet, more or less, east and 2,914.56 feet, more or less, south of the northwest corner of Samuel W. Russell Donation Claim Number 41, Section 24, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; Thence south to the White River; Thence westerly along the north bank of the White River to the easterly line of Chicago Milwaukee St. Paul and Pacific Railroad; Thence northerly along said easterly line to the southerly line of said county road; Thence easterly along said road line to point of beginning. Parcel B: Beginning 810.48 feet east and 2,914.56 feet south of the northwest corner of Samuel W. Russell Donation Claim Number 41, Section 24, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; Thence south 82.5 feet, more or less, to White River; Thence northeasterly along river, 198 feet to the south line of county road; Thence westerly to the Point of Beginning. Amrik Commercial Rentals LLC Tax Parcel Number: 000660-0082 That portion of the S.W. Russell Donation Land Claim No. 41, in King County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of Waterman’s Acre Tracts to the Town of Kent, according to the Plat recorded in Volume 12 of plats, page 11, in King County, Washington; Thence south 88°02’30” west along the south line of said Plat 713.08 feet to the southerly production of the west line of South Third Avenue, as conveyed to the City of Kent by Deed Dated July 11, 1955, and recorded under Recording Number 4599830; Thence south 1°55’37” East along said west line, and said west line produced, 1179.70 feet to an angle point in the southerly line of that Tract of land conveyed to C.L. Knudsen, W.H. 482198.5 | 361395 | 0001 -9- Meadowcroft and Fred E. Meadowcroft by Deed dated January 27, 1956, and recorded under Recording Number 4659959 and the True Point of Beginning; Thence south 88°02’30” west to the east line of the Tract of land conveyed to James A. Cavanaugh by Deed dated December 8, 1885, and recorded under Recording Number 8870; Thence south 1°58’00” east along said east line 283.80 feet, more or less, to the north line of a County Road, being also the south boundary of a tract of land conveyed to Ralph E. Leber and La Vern June Leber his wife, by Deed dated February 4, 1955, and recorded under Recording Number 4543722; Thence in an easterly direction along the north line of said County Road south 89°17’00” east 242.10 feet, north 78°06’00” east 239.10 feet north and 87°14’00” east 330.61 feet, more or less, to said southerly production of the west line of said south Third Avenue; Thence north 1°55’37” west along said produced west line 249.16 feet, more or less, to the True Point of Beginning. T. L . 0 0 0 6 6 0 - 0 0 8 3 HE A V Y E Q U I P M E N T VE N T U R E S I N C . T. L . 0 0 0 6 6 0 - 0 1 0 2 AL L A N F A M I L Y L L C . T. L . 0 0 0 6 6 0 - 0 0 2 8 PU G E T S O U N D EN E R G Y / E L E C T. L . 0 0 0 6 6 0 - 0 0 2 9 UN I O N P A C I F I C RA I L R O A D T. L . 0 0 0 6 6 0 - 0 0 8 2 AM R I K C O M M E R C I A L RE N T A L S L L C T. L . 0 0 0 6 6 0 - 0 1 0 2 AL L A N F A M I L Y L L C . PA R T I A L T A K E T. L . 0 0 0 6 6 0 - 0 0 1 7 V& S P R O P E R T I E S A N D IN V E S T M E N T IM P O R T A N T : T h i s i s n o t a S u r v e y . I t i s f u r n i s h e d a s a co n v e n i e n c e t o l o c a t e t h e l a n d i n d i c a t e d h e r e o n w i t h re f e r e n c e t o s t r e e t s a n d o t h e r l a n d . N o l i a b i l i t y i s as s u m e d b y r e a s o n o f r e l i a n c e h e r e o n . G: \ D e s i g n \ 0 9 - 3 0 0 5 M I L W A U K E E L E V E E \ D W G \ F I G U R A F O R I L A 2 . d w g , 3 / 1 7 / 2 0 1 6 1 : 1 2 : 2 2 P M Agenda Item: Consent Calendar – 7J _ TO: City Council DATE: June 21, 2016 SUBJECT: Primary Data Center Assessment and Improvement Project – Authorize SUMMARY: The City’s primary data center is currently located at Fire Station 74 in Kent, WA. The IT Department has secured the Administration Office’s support to have the King County Institutional Network (iNet) host our primary data center operations at the Sabey Data Center/DC facility in Tukwila, Washington. The Sabey facility has positioned itself as one of the premier data center co-location and turnkey infrastructure providers on the West Coast. In the event of a natural or manmade disaster, moving the data center to Sabey allows IT to concentrate its efforts on restoration of business systems, applications, and data. This would remove the additional burden IT and Facilities face by also needing to address restoration of data center infrastructure, hardware, and equipment. Moving to this new location provides the City with increased infrastructure redundancy and a stronger Disaster Recover Business Continuity capability. The Sabey move significantly improves our reliability and security posture and provides for efficient future expansion and scalability. Exhibits: 1) Position Paper – Executive Overview – Primary Data Center A & I Project 2) Project Profile - Primary IT Data Center Assessment & Improvement Project Budget Impact: • 2016 Expenditures o Implementation Cost - $37,750 *Reallocation of 2016 budget approved for Network Expansion o Recurring Monthly Charges - $5,600 *Covered by budget savings realized through the MDC/Mobile Data Computer project. • 2017 - 2018 Expenditures Recurring Monthly Charges - $5,600 *Proposed biennial budget increase to the ‘17-‘18 IT Operating Budget MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to execute all documents necessary to enter into a three-year contract with King County to establish the Sabey Data Center in Tukwila, Washington as the City’s new primary data center facility. This page intentionally left blank. IT Department – Position Paper Executive Overview Date: 04/07/16 TOPIC TITLE: Primary Data Center Assessment & Improvement Project SITUATION/POSITION The City’s Primary Data Center is currently located at Fire Station 74 in Kent, Washington. The Information Technology Department is evaluating moving the City’s Primary Data Center to Sabey in Tukwila, Washington. Moving to this new location provides the City with increased infrastructure redundancy and a stronger Disaster Recover Business Continuity Strategy (DRBC)* along with security and reliability improvements. Having a separate site for infrastructure and data will enable IT to fully implement our DRBC strategy. Since Sabey is a Tier 3 data center, it has numerous redundancies built into their data center, from multiple generators to multiple Internet Service Provider (ISP) options, and earthquake retrofitting. In a disaster recovery situation, this allows IT to concentrate their efforts on restoration of business systems, applications and data rather than applying IT resources to restoring the data center infrastructure, hardware and equipment. This will allow for the continued operations of the City of Kent during an event. In a natural disaster, a commercial data center will have more resources to restore infrastructure quicker should damage occur to equipment or hardware. Sabey is also in the process of building a data center in Eastern Washington allowing off site backups which aligns with the City of Kent’s DRBC strategy. *A Disaster Recovery Business Continuity strategy (DRBC) is a documented process and set of procedures to recover and protect business IT infrastructure in the event of a disaster. Pro/Con Analysis: Fire Station 74 Data Center Sabey Data Center # Pros Cons Pros Cons 1 Lack of Data Center Redundancies • Single Power source (utility) • Single UPS • Single Climate Control - HVAC • Single Generator Data Center Redundancies • Redundant Power sources (utility) • Redundant UPS • Redundant Climate Controls – HVAC (active and passive) • Redundant Generators 2 No co-location for DRBC available Building a data center in central Washington for DRBC (possible future co-location with fiber connection) 3 Site less secure • Access is not restricted to only those who are CJIS Compliant • No auditing for room access (keypad) Site more secure • Access restricted • Auditing of Entry access • Security patrols 24/7 • Physical security audits and assessments • State of the art controls and Page 1 of 8 IT Department – Position Paper Executive Overview Date: 04/07/16 monitoring 4 Less data center resources available to IT King County uses as their Primary Data Center • Shows that they have confidence in approach • Due diligence done on their end as well 5 Limited fiber choices • Comcast Franchise Agreement (Fiber) Abundant fiber choices with carrier neutrality (C3) 6 Facilities incurs operational expenses to maintain data center infrastructure Operational expenses for the city reduced (resource management time to maintain equipment - power, AC, facilities space footprint) 7 IT has Consultation role in construction and upgrade designs • Sabey Resources Available via King County for Construction and Upgrade Designs • Highly experienced mission critical in-house design build team available • Award-winning operations staff • Expert design and construction team Fire Station 74 Data Center Sabey Data Center # Pros Cons Pros Cons 8 Kent INET Fiber distribution point (Comcast Franchise Fiber) King County INET Fiber distribution point 9 City owned equipment • Allows us the ability to control the layout and design of the equipment on our rack City owned equipment • Allows us the ability to control the layout and design of the equipment on our rack 10 Lower tier data center (tier 1) Second Highest tier data center (tier 3) 11 Expense of Modernizing Data Center Modern infrastructure exists (i.e. Racks, Page 2 of 8 IT Department – Position Paper Executive Overview Date: 04/07/16 (i.e. racks, power, PDU, construction, HVAC, alerting, staffing, security) power, PDU, construction, HVAC, alerting, staffing, security, etc.) 12 HVAC Issues • HVAC Undersized - Unexpected outages due to component failure • Power cycles with generator tests HVAC Reliability • HVAC engineered for space • No power cycles 13 Unable to quantify cost for doing business Budgeting is predictable – fixed monthly cost 14 Redundant connections back to City Hall – No Diverse Paths for last mile • Commercially Supported 10gig Point to Point • High Capacity Network (equivalent to existing) connection b/w Sabey and City Hall Fire Station 74 Data Center Sabey Data Center # Pros Cons Pros Cons 15 Lack of space for growth Room for future expansion • The East campus comprises approximately 1,200,000 square feet of data center space including powered shell and turnkey (subletting from King County) Page 3 of 8 IT Department – Position Paper Executive Overview Date: 04/07/16 • The campus accommodates a wide variety of tenants, including some of the world’s largest and most innovative enterprises, mid- sized operators and colocation providers • Designed for flexibility and customization. Easily scalable 16 Aging infrastructure • Unexpected expenses • Infrastructure Investments – Generator/Alternate Generator Required Professional Grade Data Center (established in 1974) • One of the largest and oldest privately owned multi-tenant data center owner/developers/operators in the world. • Established history in the data center industry (40+ years) 17 Ease of physical access • Physically getting to this data center is easy • 24/7 365 access • Proximity to IT No ease of physical access • Data Center not in Kent, WA (Leveraging our relationship with King County) • Drive time • Coordination for access required 18 One power feed into FS74 building Electricity coming from multiple grids (best practice) Page 4 of 8 IT Department – Position Paper Executive Overview Date: 04/07/16 Fire Station 74 Data Center Sabey Data Center # Pros Cons Pros Cons 19 Local utility power is not designed for industrial use Local utility power designed for industrial use 20 City owned facility IT does not own the facility and is dependent on King County/Sabey contract (KC in the process of signing 30 year lease) 21 • Equipment already in place at this location • It is our own equipment which allows us the ability to control the layout and design of the equipment on our rack Initial cost of equipment (Initial cost of investment) 22 No re-occurring space expense Cost for space lease- Additional operating expense $80K/year 23 Quasi Redundant connections back to City Hall • Phase 1 connection to Sabey is a single point of failure on fiber • IT working on redundant path (Phase 2) Page 5 of 8 IT Department – Position Paper Executive Overview Date: 04/07/16 RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Information Technology Department to move our Primary Data Center from Fire Station 74 in Kent, WA to Sabey located in Tukwila, WA. The main drivers for this project request are listed below (reflected in Pro/Con section): • Aligns with the City of Kent’s long term DRBC strategy • The Sabey location is more reliable than our current location • Security will be improved as part of this move • Availability and performance will be improved as a part of this move If approved, this move of our Primary Data Center to Sabey will result in the following improvements (reflected in Pro/Con section): • Disaster Recovery Improvements • Business Continuity Improvements • System Availability Improvements • Security Improvements Page 6 of 8 IT Department – Position Paper Executive Overview Date: 04/07/16 Schedule: Phase Task Start Date End Date Plan Project Profile 3/1/16 3/18/16 Schedule – Assessment phase ONLY 3/15/16 3/18/16 RASIC Diagram 3/21/16 3/29/16 Pro/Con Doc (Position Paper) 3/22/16 4/6/16 IT Approval 4/07/16 4/07/16 MLT Approval 5/17/16 5/17/16 Operations Committee Approval Submit paperwork by 5/25/16 6/07/16 Council Approval NA 6/21/16 Plan Deployment 7/1/16 8/1/16 Execute Procurement 7/1/16 12/30/16 Confirm Sabey Lease in Place with King County (*If Sabey can’t meet connectivity then the contract is null and void) 5/1/16 5/1/16 Deploy 8/1/16 12/30/16 Stabilize Test 7/1/16 12/30/16 Close Wrap Up Meeting 1/15/17 1/15/17 Supporting Documents: • Sabey Data Center - Website • Sabey Data Center – News Articles • King County Brochure – Services • Uptime Institute - Website • Primary Data Center Assessment & Improvement Project - Project Profile Page 7 of 8 IT Department – Position Paper Executive Overview Date: 04/07/16 Assumptions (If approved): - The proposed ammendment between King County and the City of Kent will be accepted. - The City of Kent network will be extended to the new data center. - Equipment located in current (and old) Data Center (74 and City Hall) will be moved to the new Data Center within an approved project schedule. - We will minimize down time of business systems during planned outages related to data center migration. - Comprehensive communication plan during the data center migration. - User experience will not change following the data center migration. - Equipment procurement may impact the schedule. - Connection redundancy to Sabey will be a separate IT initiative outside of the scope of this project. - Internet Redundancy to Sabey will be a separate IT initiative outside of the scope of this project. Page 8 of 8 IT Department: Project Profile Project Name: Primary Data Center Assessment & Improvement Project Prepared by: Tricia Callahan Date Drafted: March 1, 2016 Service Area (SA): 16 Executive Stakeholder: Mike Carrington IT Management Sponsor: James Endicott Project Manger/ Business Analyst: Tricia Callahan Technical Lead: Galen Hirschi Project Objective: • Assessment o Budget estimates – move or not move o Schedule estimates - move or not move o Pro/Con Assessment – move or not move • Stay – recommend infrastructure updates, roles/responsibilities (RASIC) • Move – Sabey o Infrastructure verification – move or not move  What is/isn’t needed/possible o Decision – Data center location • Stay Implementation o Infrastructure Upgrade o Roles/responsibilities – doc, process, etc (RASIC) o Complete existing data center upgrade • Move Implementation o Coordinate project/sub-projects required to build out and move data center o Procure resources to assist with meeting project goals and objectives o Procure new equipment o Maximize efficiency and quality , while minimizing costs and risks through the use of repeatable processes o Oversee and facilitate the creation of service/application plans to move the equipment o Remove obsolete equipment from the current data center that will not be required in the new space Brief Overview: • Project will be managed in 2 phases – Assessment and Implementation • Make decision – Approval from the Mayor/CAO and Council [potentially] • Implementation - move o Equipment located in current (and old) Data Center (74 and City Hall) be moved to the new Data Center within an approved project schedule o Unplanned service disruptions will be minimized as best as possible during the migration • Implementation – stay o Business as usual Drivers: • Security will be improved as part of this move • Availability and performance will be improved as a part of this move • Operational expenses for the city (power, AC, facilities space footprint) reduced…resource management time to maintain equipment Justification Summary: • Disaster recovery improvements • Business continuity improvements • System availability improvements • Security improvements Page 1 of 3 IT Department: Project Profile Program Goals Supported: Support the city mission and related program initiatives through technologies and equipment that support the City information systems and data stores. Deliverables: • Project Management documents o Pro/Con o Plan/Profile – includes all sub-projects and dependencies o Schedule o Budget o RASIC o Systems Migration Plan o Inventory (equipment, systems, applications) o Implementation Plan for moving systems  Standard strategies and migration plan for moving systems, applications, functions and equipment  Standard templates and repeatable processes for moving equipment and systems o Validation report – successful migration of systems o Decommision Plan  List of items to remove • STAY AND MOVE Lease Development • STAY Design (Tenant Improvement) TI o Data Center Floor Plans • STAY Permits o Reviewed o Issued • STAY Construction TI • STAY AND MOVE Data Center Infrastructure • STAY AND MOVE Network Engineering o Internet redundancy o Wireless --- if we stay, it stays the same • Server Build Area – move: existing data center//stay: construction of TI • Telephony --- if we stay, it stays the same….evaluate what of telephony moves or does it stay local? • Fiber --- move: evaluated///stay:no change • System Engineering …move:evaluate //stay: no change • Business Applications …move:evaluate// stay: no change • Physical Move o Negotiate SOW o Phase 1 – Analysis & Strategy o Phase 2 – Architect & Validate o Phase 3 – Detailed Design o Phase 4 – Implementation  Install Servers, network infrastructure, telephony • Decommissioning – move and stay Assumptions: • Issue, risk, and change management will follow a best practice process to be described in separate project documents. • The sub-projects schedules, budgets, and dependencies are coordinated and monitored by the Project Manager. • Sub-projects o Tbd after decision made • IP Addresses will significantly change when cutting over to the new Data Center • The City of Kent network will be extended to the new data center • In-flight technology modifications will be avoided where possible to reduce risk Page 2 of 3 IT Department: Project Profile Assumptions (Continued): • Implementation will be done inside and outside of the maintenance windows with potential downtime to business systems if move occurs • Look into leasing 74 space to RFA for their data center (potential sub project) • Equipment purchases will need to be considered in the schedule and budget • Move- telephony reconfiguration (primary, secondary sites, DR) Resources: *RASIC – Responsible, Approval, Support, Informed, Consulted • TS - All • SS – All • Stay – facilities • Both - RFA • Mike, Derek Risks/Issues: • Redundant path ---plan and timing of things will be critical • Someone on the project will be assigned to fulfill the Quality Assurance role. This role will continually evaluate and assess project risks. The project will manage risks using best practice risk management practices and take actions to mitigate against these risks. Risks will be logged and managed through the project SharePoint site. Sub-project risks will be escalated to the Project Manager If they potentially impact the overall project scope, schedule or budget. • When moving equipment there is always the possibly of damage/malfunction. Will be included in the risk mitigation plans. • The Pro/Con document will outline risk and issues associated with each of the options (move vs stay) Recommendations: • Move systems, equipment, applications move in a staged approach Exclusions: • Transforming existing systems to a new technology during migration. • Cloud hosted services (storage and compute) – budget constraints Start/End Dates: • March 1, 2016 • January 1, 2017 –in new space and running • Schedule Estimated Development and/or Deployment Costs: • The cost projections include costs for the related sub-projects. This includes hardware refresh of end-of- life equipment where applicable. The costs also cover the new infrastructure including: • Server racks, power and security • Network core • Security items (firewalls) • Storage devices to allow the migration of data • Multiple Vendor services Operational Impact: • Potentially moving entire data center. Applications, systems will be put offline and there will be network outtages. • If data center moves, then resources will be allocated after hours and over the weekend. Overtime may be required and operations workload (tickets) may be impacted during parts of this project. Page 3 of 3 This page intentionally left blank. Agenda Item: Consent Calendar – 7K_ TO: City Council DATE: June 21, 2016 SUBJECT: Agreement with Community Connectivity Consortium for C3 High Speed Fiber Optic Ring Extension Project – Authorize SUMMARY: This agreement is between the C3/Community Connectivity Consortium, the University of Washington, and contributing project members, such as Kent, for C3 to design, provision, and deliver a high speed optical network around and beyond Lake Washington. The project includes pathway, conduit, fiber, and electronics to build and operate a high speed Dense Wave Division Multiplex (DWDM) optical network connecting the Westen-Seattle, UW-Bothell Campus, the City of Bellevue, the King County Regional Communications and Emergency Coordination Center/RCECC, Renton, Valley Communications Center, Kent, and the King County Data Center/KDCD at Sabey Campus in Tukwila. In conjunction with the other participating members of C3, for its part, the City of Kent is making an in-kind asset contribution of shared network equipment costs estimated to be approximately $3,500 - $4,500, right-of-way/conduit system access, and spare fiber optic cable use of approximately 59,300 feet. *See In-Kind Asset Contribution table on the next page Current project schedules forecast completion of the ring in mid-to-late Q4 2016 due in large part to the highly collaborative effort by impacted C3 members. It should be noted that Kent’s participation and contribution would not be possible if it weren’t for foresight and follow-through of our current and past City Councils, Tom Brubaker—Kent City Attorney, Tim LaPorte—Kent Public Works Director, and the IT Department for showing the initiative to have spare conduit and dark fiber placed in the City’s right-of-way whenever public works projects were being planned and executed on non-fiber specific projects. MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to execute all documents necessary to enter into an agreement with the Community Connectivity Consortium to design, provision, and deliver a high speed optical network extension that includes the City of Kent, subject to terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Information Technology Director. Contribution Type and Agency Value (est.) City of Auburn right of way/conduit system access, fiber optic cable (31,000 feet) $1,550,000 City of Bellevue right of way/conduit system access, fiber optic cable (45,100 feet) and data center node location $2,255,000 City of Federal Way right of way/conduit system access, fiber optic cable (90,500 feet) $4,525,000 City of Kent right of way/conduit system access, fiber optic cable (59,300 feet) $2,965,000 City of Kirkland right of way/conduit system access, fiber optic cable (29,300 feet) $1,465,000 City of Renton right of way/conduit system access, fiber optic cable (42,000 feet) $2,100,000 King County right of way/conduit system access, fiber optic cable (44,033 feet) $2,201,660 King County RCECC Node location** $215,760 King County Data Center Node location** $215,760 City of Bellevue Data Center Node location** $215,760 King County GIS Services $7,000 King County Data Center to PNW Gigapop POP fiber interconnect (Sabey Bldg. 5 to Bldg. 2) $120,000 University of Washington, fiber optic cable (total of 324,441 feet in the following segments): • UW Bothell to Kirkland City Hall (86,286 feet) • Westin to UW Bothell (128,116 feet) • Sabey to Westin (110,039 feet) $16,222,050 Valley Communications Center data center node location** $215,760 Total In-Kind Contributions $34,273,750 Project Funding (see section IV.A, above) $383,900 Estimated Total Project Valuation* $34,657,650 *In-kind fiber optic strand contributions valued at approximately $33,283,710, have been accounted for in previous projects and will not be included in the total project valuation. Lengths of fiber segments are estimated and include service loops. **Node location contribution based on King County’s rate card. Exhibits: C3/Community Connectivity Consortium Project Agreement #70 & Appendices Budget Impact: Estimated at between $3,500 - $4,500 for Kent’s share of applicable network equipment at the Kent Valley Communications Node Site. *All other in-kind contributions are by way of existing infrastructure and utilization of dark fiber being “lit-up” as our contribution to this regional collaborative effort. Consortium Project Agreement 70 Parties: Provide for a high speed optical network ringing Lake Washington with optical nodes located at the Westin Building, UW-Bothell campus, Bellevue City Hall, King County Regional Communications and Emergency Coordination Center, Valley Communications Center and the King County Data Center at Sabey Campus. An Addendum to the Community Connectivity Consortium’s Project Agreement Template Policy 1 Table of Contents I. Project Summary ..................................................................................................... 4 A. Project Number 70 ............................................................................................... 4 B. Project Name ........................................................................................................ 4 C. Project Description ............................................................................................... 4 D. Lead Agency/Project Manager ............................................................................. 4 E. Participating Agencies.......................................................................................... 4 II. Description of Project ............................................................................................. 4 A. Fiber Segments ..................................................................................................... 4 B. Active Electronics ................................................................................................ 6 C. Project Specifications and Scope of Work ........................................................... 6 III. Responsibilities ....................................................................................................... 7 A. University of Washington .................................................................................... 7 B. Node Site Hosts .................................................................................................... 8 C. City of Bellevue ................................................................................................... 9 D. King County ......................................................................................................... 9 E. Valley Communications Center ........................................................................... 9 F. Fiber Optic Segment Contributors ....................................................................... 9 G. System Changes ................................................................................................. 11 IV. Project Budget/Payments ...................................................................................... 11 A. Budget ................................................................................................................ 11 B. Optional Services Costs ..................................................................................... 11 C. In -Kind Asset Contributions .............................................................................. 12 D. Payments ............................................................................................................ 13 E. Completion and Acceptance............................................................................... 13 V. Optical System Equipment Refreshes ...................................................................... 13 VI. Agreement Term ................................................................................................... 14 VII. Apportionment of Liability ................................................................................... 14 VIII. Disclaimer, Third Party Components, and Exclusion of Damages ...................... 15 IX. Project Schedule .................................................................................................... 16 X. Changes or Addenda to Project Agreement Template Policy ............................... 16 XI. Miscellaneous ........................................................................................................ 16 2 XII. Approvals .............................................................................................................. 17 3 I. Project Summary A. Project Number 70 B. Project Name C3 Optical Network System around Lake Washington C. Project Description This Consortium Project Agreement #70 (“Agreement”), consisting of this agreement, its appendices A-F, attached hereto and incorporated herein, and the Template Policy, is entered between the Community Connectivity Consortium (“C3”), the University of Washington (“UW”), and contributing project members as noted in Section E below for design, provisioning, and delivery of a high speed optical network around Lake Washington (“the System”). The System may only be used for the purpose of supporting public, not-for-profit, and governmental institutions unless explicitly agreed otherwise in writing by all parties. This project includes pathway, conduit, fiber and electronics to build and operate a high speed dense wave division multiplex (“DWDM”) optical network around Lake Washington connecting The Westin, Seattle; UW-Bothell Campus; the City of Bellevue; the King County Regional Communications and Emergency Coordination Center (“RCECC”), Renton; Valley Communications Center, Kent; and King County Data Center (“KCDC”) at Sabey Campus. Tukwila. D. Lead Agency/Project Manager University of Washington E. Participating Agencies City of Auburn City of Bellevue City of Federal Way City of Kent City of Kirkland City of Renton King County Valley Communications Center II. Description of Project A. Fiber Segments 1. Route Segment Descriptions • Fiber used in this project shall include existing fiber in 11 segments. - Segment 1 – The Westin, Seattle to UW-Bothell Campus, Bothell. Segment contributor: UW 4 - Segment 2 – UW-Bothell to City of Kirkland City Hall, Kirkland. Segment contributor: UW - Segment 3 – Kirkland City Hall to Bellevue City Hall, Bellevue Segment contributor: City of Kirkland - Segment 4 – Bellevue City Hall to King County RCECC, Renton. Segment contributor: City of Bellevue - Segment 5 – King County RCECC to Benson Hill Elementary, Renton. Segment contributor: City of Renton - Segment 6 – Benson Hill Elementary to Comcast Kent Vista Hub, Renton. Segment Contributor: King County - Segment 7 – Comcast Kent Vista Hub to Valley Communications Center, Kent. Segment Contributor: City of Kent - Segment 8 – Valley Communications Center to City of Auburn data center, Auburn. Segment contributor: City of Auburn - Segment 9 – City of Auburn data center to City of Federal Way data center, Federal Way. Segment contributor: King County - Segment 10 – City of Federal Way data center to KCDC at Sabey Campus, Tukwila. Segment Contributor: City of Federal Way - Segment 11 – KCDC at Sabey Campus to the Westin Building, Seattle. Segment contributor: UW • Specific fiber routing is shown on Appendix D to this Agreement. Some splicing of existing fiber will be required to complete the loop. 2. Points of Demarcation/Node Sites: • The Westin Building Node Site Host: UW Address: Suite 804, 2001 6th Ave, Seattle, WA • UW-Bothell Campus, Bothell Node Site Host: UW Address: Physical Plant Bldg., 18115 Campus Way NE, Bothell, WA • City of Bellevue City Hall 5 Node Site Host: City of Bellevue Address: Room MEC01, 450 110th Ave NE, Bellevue, WA • King County RCECC Node Site Host: King County Address: Room 142, 3511 NE 2nd St, Renton, WA • Valley Communications Center Node Site Host: Valley Communications Center Address: Room 153, 27519 108 Avenue SE, Kent, WA • KCDC at Sabey Campus Node Site Host: King County Address: KCDC, 3655 S 120th Place, Bldg. 5, Tukwila, WA B. Active Electronics 1. Base System Description. The base system hardware includes chassis, system management hardware and software, amplifiers, and filters. The base system will provide the following capabilities: • A DWDM system with 80 wave capacity. • Each wave is capable of supporting Ethernet services ranging in speed from 1 to 100 Gigabit per second (“Gbps”), depending on the equipment purchased. • 40 waves will be allocated to UW. • 40 waves will be allocated to C3. 2. Ethernet Services Description. The initial C3 investment includes one Ethernet service switch at each Node site as follows: • Sixteen 1 Gigabit Ethernet (“GE”) services will be available to C3 members from any Node Site to any Node Site on the ring. • Six of the C3 waves will be used for the 16x1GE services. • Four of the C3 waves will be made available to King County in exchange for funding of a node site to be installed and operated at the Valley Communications Center as detailed in the Project Budget Table below, leaving 30 waves available for C3’s future allocation. All services on the network will be path protected at layer 1 to survive fiber breaks. This protection is provided by an Optical Path Protection Module, which protects services at the per-wave level. The services are demarked at the client port on the node. All base system and optional services will be provisioned with path protection as a standard. There will be no option to have unprotected services on the backbone. C. Project Specifications and Scope of Work This project shall meet all Node Site specifications, as outlined in Appendix A, and shall follow manufacturer recommendations for equipment installation and operations. Any 6 deviations from Node Site specifications are clearly documented in Appendix B and shall be remedied by the Node Site Host prior to the Acceptance Date unless deemed an acceptable risk by the Lead Agency. III. Responsibilities The following responsibilities of the organizations listed below shall exist for the term of this Agreement as specified in section V below, and for any subsequent extensions as allowed by this Agreement: A. University of Washington 1. Lead Agency. UW shall act as the project manager, system architect, equipment, operations and maintenance supplier for a high speed optical network ringing Lake Washington (see Appendix D, Route Map). 2. Operations/Maintenance. Although jointly funded, all the C3 equipment will be procured, owned, operated, and maintained exclusively by UW except as described in the remainder of this section (Section III). C3 members, including future members, may use the fiber ring in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. All scheduled maintenance shall be performed during agreed upon maintenance windows. UW Network Operations Center (“NOC”) will make reasonable efforts to ensure that optical network services are available and monitored 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, with the exception of upgrades, maintenance, and outages. In the event of a C3 equipment failure, the UW NOC will dispatch UW engineers to the applicable node site as required at the discretion of the UW NOC. UW NOC shall report, via web page and email distribution lists, all network outages and network incidents to C3 as they occur. C3 may report any known service outages to UW NOC by calling 206-221-6000 or sending an email to netops@uw.edu. 3. Maintenance Agreements. UW will maintain all C3 equipment vendor maintenance agreements, which will require a C3 maintenance commitment for the life of the equipment. 4. Spares. UW will also maintain spares for all of the base system hardware as identified in Appendix C. 5. Change Management. UW shall notify C3 of any system changes materially affecting the C3 service. UW shall use industry standard change management procedures for system changes as follows: • Routine - The standard process: 7-10 business days • Urgent - For change requests that address time-critical and significant network outages, security threats, or business risks • Recurring - Lower-risk, lower-impact network changes that occur on a regular, scheduled basis. 6. Westin and UW Bothell sites. In addition to Node Site responsibilities listed in section III.B below, UW will provide rack and cabinet space in the Westin and UW Bothell Node Sites, as described in Appendix B. 7 B. Node Site Hosts 1. “Node Site Hosts” means the parties listed in the following table: Project Member Contact Email Business Hour* Contact After hours Contact City of Bellevue IS Help Desk 425.452.2886 425.452.2886 King County (RCECC and Sabey Campus) KC NOC 206.263.7000 206.263.7000 Valley Communications Center Help Desk 253.372.1575 253.372.1575 University of Washington NOC 206.221.6000 206.221.6000 *Business hours shall be considered 7 a.m.–5 p.m. for purposes of this Agreement. 2. Node Site Operations. Each Node Site Host shall be responsible for the operation of the Node Site facility at the specific locations outlined above, in accordance with the C3 Node Site Specifications listed in Appendix A. Each Node Site Host shall operate the Node Site on a 24x7x365 basis. UW NOC is responsible for the 24x7x365 monitoring of the network. Should an interruption in service occur, UW NOC will initiate immediate restoration and notification procedures. As required, Node Site Hosts and Fiber Optic Segment Contributors shall: a. Respond (Mean time to Respond) acknowledging the service disruption within 30 minutes of initial contact. b. Arrive on site within 2 hours of initial contact. Reasonable efforts will be made to commence work immediately and work until complete. c. Node Site Hosts shall make reasonable efforts to provide hourly updates to the UW NOC. d. UW NOC will make reasonable efforts to provide subsequent updates via web page and email distribution lists to C3 members until the outage is resolved. Members may use staff, support vendor or in the instance of a fiber break, C3 contracted firms to resolve the issue. 3. Node Site Maintenance. Each Node host shall be responsible for the maintenance of its Node Site facility, and shall maintain, for the duration of this Agreement, a parts replacement and technical support contract as applicable in order to meet Node Site support requirements as identified in Appendix A. Said contract shall operate 24x7x365. Should a Node Site facility maintenance issue arise that is not specifically listed, those costs shall be the responsibility of the Node Site host. Any Node Site facility maintenance shall be performed during agreed upon maintenance windows and low traffic periods for public safety. A schedule for Node Site maintenance activities will be established by the each Node Site host, and notifications will be sent to C3 at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled maintenance. 8 4. Site/System Security. Node Site host will ensure that site and access security to the electronics meet the minimum Criminal Justice Information Services (“CJIS”) Security Policy Ver. 5.3 or any subsequent revision thereof. 5. Change Management. Node Site hosts shall notify UW and other C3 members of any system changes materially affecting the C3 service. Node Site hosts shall use industry standard change management procedures for Node Site changes as follows: • Routine - The standard process: 7-10 business days • Urgent - For change requests that address time-critical and significant network outages, security threats, or business risks • Recurring - Lower-risk, lower-impact, network changes that occur on a regular, scheduled basis. C. City of Bellevue In addition to Node Site responsibilities listed in section III.B above, The City of Bellevue will provide rack and cabinet space in its data center as described in Appendix B. D. King County 1. King County Data Center at Sabey Campus. In addition to Node site responsibilities listed in section III.B above, King County will provide rack and cabinet space in its data center located at the Sabey Data Center Campus as described Appendix B, and provide a pair of fiber between the King County Data Center in Building 5 and the UW point of presence (“POP”) in Building 2 of the Sabey Complex. King County will also provide transport fiber between the Building 5 Meet-Me-Room and the King County Data Center to extend the City of Federal Way segment to the data center. 2. King County Regional Communications and Emergency Coordination Center (RCECC). In addition to Node Site responsibilities listed in Section III.B above, King County will provide rack and cabinet space in its data center located at the RCECC as described in Appendix B. E. Valley Communications Center In addition to Node Site responsibilities listed in section III.B above, Valley Communications Center will provide rack and cabinet space in its data center as described in Appendix B. F. Fiber Optic Segment Contributors Expected future maintenance of the fiber optic cable contributed (Note fiber segment contributors above) to this project is outlined below: 1. “Fiber Optic Segment Contributors” means the project members listed in the following table: Project Member Contact** Email Business After hours 9 Hour* Contact Contact City of Auburn Melissa Medisch Colin Schmalz Brian Garbarino 253.804.5078 253.261.1601 253.261.2476 City of Federal Way Brian Pearson Thomas Fichtner 253.835.2552 253.835.2547 206.755.8548 253.835.2552 206.755.8548 City of Kent Galen Hirschi James Endicott 253.856.4616 253.856.4620 253.266.2299 253.561.1998 City of Kirkland IT Help Desk 425.587.4357 425.313.2132 City of Renton IT Help Desk 425.430.6870 206.300.0571 UW UW NOC City of Bellevue IS Help Desk 425.452.2886 425.452.2886 King County KC NOC 206.263.7000 206.263.7000 *Business hours shall be considered 7 a.m.–5 p.m. for purposes of this Agreement. **Contact shall be made in the order listed in the table. 2. Route Preparation. All work shall be done during normal working hours. The fiber optic route utilizes existing City of Kirkland, City of Bellevue, City of Renton, City of Kent, Valley Communications Center, City of Auburn, King County, City of Federal Way, and UW fiber. If any construction, remediation, or relocation is required, it will be funded and completed by the Fiber Optic Segment Contributor in consultation with the Lead Agency. 3. Fiber Terminations, Splicing and Testing. All work shall be done during normal working hours. Segment contributors will confirm all splice details prior to undertaking any work under this section. The cost of any splicing required under this Agreement shall be borne by the applicable C3 member requesting the splice. Fiber pairs shall be tested prior to implementation of Active Electronics. 4. Locates/Fiber Relocation. Member fiber optic strands contributed to this project were constructed under other project agreements that contain provisions for locates and relocation of fiber. Any fiber locate or fiber relocation shall be managed by the Fiber Optic Segment Contributor. 5. Repairs/Breaks. The C3 fiber segment contributor shall be responsible for immediate detection and coordination of timely repair of all breaks or outages of fiber in fiber segments identified in this Agreement. The underlying fiber optic agreements shall determine the cost allocation of the repair. C3 and/or the project participants shall contract with a competent and qualified vendor to provide 7x24x365, four-hour response to any fiber breaks/outages that happen on the fiber segments in the agreement. 6. Notification and Response Process: In the event of a fiber optic disruption or cable break, notification and response procedures shall be those defined above in section III.B.2 or as defined in any applicable subsequent operations document. 10 G. System Changes The parties acknowledge that the optical network design, location of node sites, use of fiber optic cable through a franchise agreement, or other matters relating to the System may need to change during the term of this Agreement. Accordingly, the parties agree to cooperate in good faith to resolve any such need for changes, to jointly determine how the associated costs should be allocated between the parties, and, if necessary, to modify this Agreement in accordance with the requirements of section XI.A herein. IV. Project Budget/Payments The base configuration includes 4 node sites funded jointly by UW and C3. Two additional node sites will be funded as follows: • Valley Communications Center, Kent: funded by King County. • Sabey Data Center Campus, Tukwila: funded by UW. A. Budget Project Budget Detail *Sale s tax is inclu ded in the quote d equip ment costs. B . O p t i o n a l S e Organization Item Description Non-Recurring Cost UW Operations Recurring Cost Vendor Maintenance Recurring Cost Total Monthly Recurring Cost UW Core Optical System Equipment with Installation $90,000 N/A N/A N/A Network Service Equipment with $60,000 N/A N/A N/A Sabey Optical Node Equipment with Installation $50,000 N/A N/A N/A UW Subtotal $200,000 N/A N/A N/A C3 Core Optical System Equipment with Installation $90,000 $760 $880 $1,640 Network Service Equipment with Installation $40,000 $300 N/A $300 ValleyCom Locking $2,400 N/A N/A N/A Miscellaneous Fiber $1,500 N/A N/A N/A Sabey Optical Node N/A $190 $220 $410 ValleyCom Optical Node N/A $190 $220 $410 C3 Subtotal $133,900 $1,440 $1,320 $2,760 King County ValleyCom Optical Node Equipment with $50,000 N/A N/A N/A King County Subtotal $50,000 N/A N/A N/A COSTS $383,900 $1,440 $1,320 $2,760 11 rvices Costs Optional services will be made available by C3 to C3 members using a business model and pricing to be defined by the C3 Board. The cost, both one-time and recurring, of any additional slots or chassis required for any C3 services will be added to the cost of the proposed service, and invoiced by UW to C3. C. In-Kind Asset Contributions In-Kind Asset Contribution Table* Contribution Type and Agency Value (est.) City of Auburn right of way/conduit system access, fiber optic cable (31,000 feet) $1,550,000 City of Bellevue right of way/conduit system access, fiber optic cable (45,100 feet) and data center node location $2,255,000 City of Federal Way right of way/conduit system access, fiber optic cable (90,500 feet) $4,525,000 City of Kent right of way/conduit system access, fiber optic cable (59,300 feet) $2,965,000 City of Kirkland right of way/conduit system access, fiber optic cable (29,300 feet) $1,465,000 City of Renton right of way/conduit system access, fiber optic cable (42,000 feet) $2,100,000 King County right of way/conduit system access, fiber optic cable (44,033 feet) $2,201,660 King County RCECC Node location** $215,760 King County Data Center Node location** $215,760 City of Bellevue Data Center Node location** $215,760 King County GIS Services $7,000 King County Data Center to PNW Gigapop POP fiber interconnect (Sabey Bldg. 5 to Bldg. 2) $120,000 University of Washington, fiber optic cable (total of 324,441 feet in the following segments): • UW Bothell to Kirkland City Hall (86,286 feet) • Westin to UW Bothell (128,116 feet) • Sabey to Westin (110,039 feet) $16,222,050 Valley Communications Center data center node location** $215,760 Total In-Kind Contributions $34,273,750 Project Funding (see section IV.A, above) $383,900 Estimated Total Project Valuation* $34,657,650 *In-kind fiber optic strand contributions valued at approximately $33,283,710, have been accounted for in previous projects and will not be included in the total project valuation. Lengths of fiber segments are estimated and include service loops. **Node location contribution based on King County’s rate card. 12 D. Payments C3 and King County will provide funding to UW for project nonrecurring costs as outlined above in the Project Budget Detail table. • C3 will pay to UW a one-time fee of $133,900 within 30 days of the Effective Date. • King County will pay to UW a one-time fee of $50,000 within 30 days of the Effective Date. Regarding recurring maintenance and operations fees to be paid by C3, payment shall be as follows. Subsequent to the Acceptance Date, and on the annual anniversary of the Acceptance Date thereafter, an annual recurring maintenance and operations fee of $29,520 ($2,460 x 12 months) as outlined above in the Project Budget Detail Table, plus any additional recurring fees as identified in section IV.B, will be invoiced by UW to C3. Payment for the entire annual amount is due within 30 days of invoice. If C3 fails to make timely payment, UW may charge one percent (1%) per month on the amount due until paid in full. Should the payments of recurring fees to UW become more than 360 days past due, UW may choose to discontinue any services provided on the C3 Optical Network System without affecting any other rights or obligations of the parties to this Project. E. Completion and Acceptance UW will make reasonable efforts to provide all functionality contemplated in this agreement within 120 days of receipt of equipment from the manufacturer. Testing and acceptance will be considered complete as of the Acceptance Date, as defined in Appendix F. V. Optical System Equipment Refreshes The initial C3 optical system equipment (to include the optical system equipment at additional Node Sites) will have an expected life of 7 years. This expected life period will begin on the Acceptance Date and end 7 years after the Acceptance Date (“the Initial Optical System Equipment Term”). In conjunction with the completion of the Initial Optical System Equipment Term, and thereafter on each anniversary of that date, UW will evaluate the optical system equipment to determine if its useful life can be extended an additional year. Upon UW’s determination that the useful life of the optical system equipment can no longer be extended, UW will consult with C3 to develop a new system design and quote for a technical refresh of the optical system equipment. Such costs for the technical refresh of the core equipment, and the available capacity of the resulting system, shall be apportioned 50% to UW, 50% to C3. As with this Agreement for the original system, any additional costs associated with network services provisioned on the resulting core system shall accrue to the party (UW, C3, or the Participating Agency) requesting the network services. These provisions shall also apply to any subsequent technical refreshes. In the event C3 or UW decides not to fund its percentage of the core equipment, the remaining party (C3 or UW) may choose to fund the entire technical refresh, and as a result retain 100% of the available capacity of the resulting system. If C3 declines to fund its percentage of the core equipment refresh, UW will retain rights of use and access to all fiber segments and node site use in accordance with the overall terms and conditions of this Agreement. If UW declines to fund its 13 percentage of the core equipment refresh, C3 will retain rights of use and access to fiber segments under the control of UW, and all UW Lead Agency responsibilities as defined in section III.A (1- 5) will end. VI. Agreement Term A. Term. This Agreement shall be effective as of the date when it has been executed by all parties (“Effective Date”) and continue in full force and effect for twenty years from the Effective Date (“Initial Agreement Term”), and will be automatically renewed in 5 year increments (“Renewal Periods”) unless terminated in accordance with the provisions below. B. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated at any time upon the unanimous written agreement of all of the parties to this Agreement. In addition, any party may terminate this Agreement at the end of the Initial Agreement Term or at the end of any 5-year Renewal Period. To terminate the Agreement as allowed by this paragraph, a party must provide a written notice of termination to all other parties at least 180 days in advance of the end of the Initial Agreement Term or applicable Renewal Period. C. Disposition of Equipment. In the event this Agreement is terminated prior to the end of the Initial Agreement Term or any Renewal Period, UW shall redeliver the portion of optical equipment funded by C3 and King County and cancel all manufacturer’s maintenance contracts. Whereas C3 funding supports a portion of the core equipment and may support a portion of the technical equipment refresh, UW will work in partnership with C3 to determine the most equitable redistribution of equipment. Costs for transporting or shipping will be paid by C3 and King County respectively. UW will incur no liability on account of any such termination. VII. Apportionment of Liability A. Liability 1. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, each party shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the other parties, including their officers, officials, employees, agents, and regents, from and against any claim alleging harm, damage, injury, or loss to any person or property to the extent such claim arises out of or results from its own, or its employees’ or agents’, negligent acts or omissions, whether during construction or after completion of the project. 2. If a party uses contractors or subcontractors for work pursuant to this Agreement, then either (a) the party agrees that its obligations in section VII.A above will include responsibility for claims arising from the performance of such contractors and subcontractors, or (b) the party will include in its contract with any such contractor or subcontractor a provision requiring the contractor or subcontractor to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the other parties, including their officers, officials, employees, agents, and regents from and against any claim arising from the contractor’s or subcontractor’s performance. 3. The indemnity in section VII.A above is specifically and expressly intended to constitute a waiver of each party’s immunity under the Washington Industrial Insurance Act, RCW Title 51, (a) only between and with regard to the parties, (b) only for work done by a party, and (c) only to the extent necessary to provide the indemnified party or parties with a full and complete indemnity 14 of claims made by the indemnitor’s employees. The parties acknowledge that these provisions were specifically negotiated and agreed upon by them. B. Worker Insurance Each party to this Agreement shall ensure that it and all persons performing work on its behalf, including without limitation project suppliers and subcontractors, maintain in effect at all times during the Work, coverage or insurance in accordance with the applicable laws relating to worker’s compensation and employer’s liability insurance (including, but not limited to, the Washington Industrial Insurance Act and the laws of the state in which any such person was hired), regardless of whether such coverage or insurance is mandatory or merely elective under the law. Each party shall furnish such assurance and evidence of such coverage or insurance (such as copies of insurance policies and Certificates of Compliance issued by the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries) as Participating Agencies may request. C. General Liability Insurance. Each party to this Agreement shall maintain in full force and effect throughout the term of this Agreement, a minimum of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) liability insurance for property damage and bodily injury, and shall cause its agents, contractors, and subcontractors to maintain the same with regard to work under this Agreement. In satisfying the insurance requirements set forth in this section, a party may self-insure against such risks in such amounts as are reasonable for a municipality or agency of its size or shall obtain a coverage agreement through a Risk Pool authorized by Chapter 48.62 RCW which shall provide liability coverage to the party for the liabilities contractually assumed by the party in this Agreement. At the time of execution of this Agreement, and prior to commencement of performance of any of the Work, each party shall furnish, upon request, a Certificates of Insurance as evidence that policies providing insurance (or self-insurance) with such provisions, coverages and limits are in full force and effect. VIII. Disclaimer, Third Party Components, and Exclusion of Damages A. DISCLAIMER. ALL SERVICES AND ACTIVITIES PROVIDED BY A PARTY UNDER THIS AGREEMENT, INCLUDING SERVICES AND ACTIVITIES PERFORMED BY THE UW AND THE NODE SITE HOSTS, AND NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT, THE PARTIES ACCEPT SUCH ACTIVITIES, SERVICES AND THE SERVICE EQUIPMENT “AS IS,” WITH NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY ARISING FROM STATUTE, COURSE OF DEALING, COURSE OF PERFORMANCE, OR USAGE OF TRADE. WITHOUT LIMITING THE GENERALITY OF THE FOREGOING, NO PARTY HAS ANY OBLIGATION TO INDEMNIFY OR DEFEND ANY OTHER PARTY AGAINST CLAIMS RELATED TO INFRINGEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS. 15 B. Third Party Components. UW shall (a) pass through to the non-UW parties any warranty right UW receives from a third party provider of Third Party Components, and (b) reasonably cooperate with the non-UW party, at that party’s expense, in enforcing such rights. UW PROVIDES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, WITH REGARD TO THIRD PARTY COMPONENTS, AND UW WILL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY FAILURE OF ANY THIRD PARTY COMPONENT TO FUNCTION AS EXPECTED OR INTENDED. C. EXCLUSION OF DAMAGES. TO THE EXTENT ALLOWED BY LAW, AND NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT, IN NO EVENT WILL ANY PARTY BE LIABLE TO ANY OTHER PARTY OR TO ANY THIRD PARTY FOR ANY LOST PROFITS (WHETHER DIRECT OR INDIRECT) OR LOSS OF DATA, COVER, SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES, OR FOR INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE, SPECIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES (INCLUDING DAMAGE TO BUSINESS, REPUTATION, OR GOODWILL), OR INDIRECT DAMAGES OF ANY TYPE HOWEVER CAUSED, WHETHER BY BREACH OF CONTRACT, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE), OR ANY OTHER LEGAL OR EQUITABLE CAUSE OF ACTION, EVEN IF THE PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF SUCH DAMAGES IN ADVANCE OR IF SUCH DAMAGES WERE FORESEEABLE. IX. Project Schedule Task Target Completion Date Circulate and sign copies of the project PA June 2016 Complete fiber optic splicing/testing June 2016 Issue Purchase Orders June 2016 Installation of rack/cabinet equipment June 2016 Installation, configuration, testing of equipment December 2016 Go-Live January 2017 X. Changes or Addenda to Project Agreement Template Policy This Agreement shall be interpreted in conjunction with the Project Agreement Template Policy document, which is incorporated into this Agreement by reference. This Agreement shall supersede the Project Agreement Template Policy document to the extent it contains terms and conditions which change, modify, delete, add to, supplement or otherwise amend the terms and conditions of the Project Agreement Template Policy document. XI. Miscellaneous A. Modifications or Amendments No modification to or amendment of the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by authorized representatives of the parties to this Agreement. The parties expressly reserve the right to modify this Agreement, from time to time, by mutual agreement as called for in the Project Agreement Template Policy. B. Counterparts This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which so executed will be deemed to be an original and such counterparts together will constitute on and the same agreement. 16 C. Authority Each party hereby represents and warrants to the other parties that it has the right, powers, and authority to enter into this Agreement and to fully perform all of its obligations hereunder. XII. Approvals IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Project Agreement on the respective dates indicated below. _________________________ ________ __________________ Nancy Backus Date City Attorney Mayor City of Auburn _________________________ ________ __________________ Toni Cramer Date City Attorney Chief Information Officer City of Bellevue ________________________ ________ __________________ Jim Ferrell Date City Attorney Mayor City of Federal Way _________________________ ________ __________________ Suzette Cooke Date City Attorney 17 Mayor City of Kent _________________________ ________ __________________ Brenda Cooper Date City Attorney Chief Information Officer City of Kirkland Approved as to Legal Form: _________________________ ________ __________________ Denis Law Date City Attorney Mayor City of Renton _________________________ ________ Bill Kehoe Date Chief Technology Officer King County _________________________ ________ Dan Jordt Date Associate Vice President University of Washington Information Technology 18 _________________________ ________ Lora Ueland Date Executive Director Valley Communications Center _________________________ ________ Chelo Picardal Date Chief Technology Officer Community Connectivity Consortium 19 Appendix A C3 Node Site Specifications 20 Appendix B C3 Site Preparedness 21 Appendix C Spares List Part Number Description 1040700041 Power Supply Module DC for 9HU Shelf, 1000W, PSU/9HU-DC, HW Rel 2.00 1040700042-01 Power Supply Module AC for 9HU Shelf, 1000W, PSU/9HU-AC, HW Rel 1.02 1063708416 Common Equipment Module for 9HU Shelf, CEM/9HU, HW Rel 2.00 1042700011 Fan Module for 9HU Shelf, FAN/9HU, HW Rel 2.00 1063708423-01 Shelf Control Unit II with High-Availability Functionality, 2.5 HU high for small slots, SCU-II, HW Rel 1.01 0061705844-03 SFP IF, 850nm, Intra-Office Reach, for 1G FC, 2G FC, and GigE, SFP/2G1/850I/MM/LC, HW Rel 3.01 1063708412 Network Element Control Unit with high performance processor, 2.5 HU high, 2 RJ45 Ethernet ports and 1 serial port, NCU-II, HW Rel 2.01 1063708463-03 Optical Supervisory Channel Module with 2 pluggable network ports, OSCM-PN, HW Rel 3.01 1061706193 SFP IF, 1510nm, Very Long Reach, 125Mbit/s only, for use with OSCM-PN and OSFM+#1510, SFP/FE/C1510V/SM/LC, HW Rel 2.00 1063701000-01 Dual Terminal 10G Core XPDR with 2x XFP client IFs and 2x XFP network IFs, 2WCC-PCN-10G, HW Rel 1.01 1063703210-01 5-Terminal Access XPDR with 5x SFP+ client IFs and 5x SFP+ network IFs, 5WCA-PCN-16GU, HW Rel 1.01 1063703200 Dual Terminal 10G Access XPDR with 2x XFP client IFs and 2x XFP network IFs, 2WCA-PCN-10G, HW Rel 2.00 1078974400-01 SH1PCS, 1HU Packet Connectivity Shelf for Packet Optical Carrier Ethernet with Full 11G OTN Line Interface, EFEC, & GCC Communication, Includes 2x Slots for Client Cards (Kit, including Fan Module, 1x PSU filler, and 1x Client Interface filler), SH1PCS&FAN 1040974039 SH1PCS, 200W AC Power Supply Module, S/PSU/AC-200, HW Rel 1.01 1078974424-01 SH1PCS, 8-Port GigE Client Interface Module with SFP Pluggable Ports, PCS/PM/GE/8/SFP, HW Rel 1.01 0061701811-03 11G XFP IF, 1310nm, Standard Reach, 9.953 Gbit/s-11.400 Gbit/s, XFP/11G/1310S/SM/LC, HW Rel 3.01 1061701850-02 10G/11G SFP+ IF, 1310 nm, Short Reach, SFP+/11GU/1310S/SM/LC, HW Rel 2.01 1061705850-02 SFP IF, 1310 nm, Standard Reach, Gigabit Ethernet (FSP 3000/FSP150) and Fast Ethernet (FSP 150 only), with Industrial Temperature Range, SFP/GBE/1310S/SM/LC/TIN, HW Rel 2.01 1061701400-01 Up to 11G XFP DWDM IF, Very Long Reach, C-Band Tunable, 81 Wavelengths, XFP/11G/DCTV/SM/LC, HW Rel 1.01 1061702000-01 Up to 11G SFP+ DWDM IF, Very Long Reach, C-Band Tunable, 96 Wavelengths, SFP+/11GU/DCTV/SM/LC, HW Rel 1.01 1063708449-01 Optical Path Protection Module, OPPM, HW Rel 1.01 1063708320 ROADM Module, 8-Degree, WSS-Based, 40 C-Band Wavelengths, 100 GHz, with WSS, 1x8 Power Splitter, and Integrated OPM, 8ROADM-C40/0/OPM, HW Rel 2.02 1063709052 Optical Amplifier, Double Stage, 20 dBm maximum output power, variable gain for low-gain applications, gain controlled (C-Band), Dual Monitoring Ports, EDFA-C-D20-VLGC-DM, HW Rel 2.01 22 Appendix D Ring Map 23 Appendix E Fiber Segment Detail Spreadsheet 24 Appendix F Definitions Acceptance Date The date after 72 continuous hours of network operation within acceptable parameters agreed to by the C3 and UW jointly. Active Electronics Switches, routers, hubs that move data across a network. Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing Dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) is a technology that puts data from different sources together on an optical fiber, with each signal carried at the same time on its own separate light wavelength.* Fiber Segment A length of fiber optic cable between known points. Lead Agency Lead agency is the project member responsible for the successful completion of the project. NOC Network operations center. Node Site Facility location, usually a data center, of the optical network gear. Optical Path Protection Module Provides protection to the network so that a service disruption to the network, reverses traffic in the opposite direction around the disruption (No loss of service.). Response Time Acknowledgement of receipt of an incident call. Wave A band of colored light used to transmit data. 24x7x365 Denotes industry standard language where service is provided 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days per year. *Source: http://searchtelecom.techtarget.com/definition/dense-wavelength-division-multiplexing 25 This page intentionally left blank. APPENDIX E FIBER SEGMENT DETAILS Date: 02/19/16 SIX C3 High Speed Ring Nodes at Westin, UW Bothell, Bellevue City Hall, KC RCECC, VCOM, and Sabey Tukwila For data Compilation - King County GIS Contact: Cheryl Wilder (206) 477-4421, Cheryl.Wilder@kingcounty.gov Fiber Link No.Description UWDLR Fiber Contributor Fiber Owner Bldg Strands Panel Ports Building Strands Panel Ports Tested Length Fiber Line Status Name Email Phone Name Email Phone Fiber Route Details for GIS Mapping (Digital Spatial data set; ESRI, AC, text descriptor, or hardcopy) Segment #1 Westin To UW Bothell DLR003375 1.1 Westin To UW Bothell UW UW Westin 804.01.08 P1 9/10 UW Bothell B1-2 11/12 Assigned by UW Brenda Jones brendaj@uw.edu 206-221-4523 Brenda Jones brendaj@uw.edu 206-221-4523 Segment #2 UW Bothell To Bellevue City Hall 2.1 UW Bothell To Kirkland City Hall UW UW UW Bothell B1-2 23/24 Kirkland City Hall A1-2 9/10 Assigned by UW Xiaoning Jiang, CoK XJiang@kirklandwa.gov 425.587.3070 Donna Gaw dgaw@kirklandwa.gov (425) 587-3080 2.2 Kirkland City Hall To Bellevue City Hall CoK CoK/CoB Kirkland City Hall 93/94 Bellevue City Hall 93/94 Complete Xiaoning Jiang, CoK XJiang@kirklandwa.gov 425.587.3070 Donna Gaw dgaw@kirklandwa.gov (425) 587-3080 Segment #3 Bellevue City Hall To RCECC 3.1 Bellevue City Hall To NE 4th Street & Monroe Ave. in Renton (via Factoria Blvd. & Coal Creek PKWY)CoBV CoB Bellevue City Hall 71/72 NE 4th St & Monroe Ave 71/72 Splice needed Smitha Vijayan, CoB svijayan@bellevuewa.gov 425.452.6053 Jim Rawley JRawley@bellevuewa.gov 425.452.7197 3.2 NE 4th Street & Monroe Ave. in Renton To RCECC CoBV CoB NE 4th St & Monroe Ave 71/72 RCECC 127/128 Splice needed Smitha Vijayan, CoB svijayan@bellevuewa.gov 425.452.6053 Jim Rawley JRawley@bellevuewa.gov 425.452.7197 Segment #4 RCECC To ValleyCom 4.1 RCECC To NE 4th and Monroe, Renton CoRenton CoR RCECC 71/72 NE 4th & Monroe, Renton 71/72 Splice needed Tim Moore TMoore@Rentonwa.gov 425.430.6881 Ron Hansen rhansen@rentonwa.gov (425) 430-6873 4.2 NE 4th Street & Monroe Ave. to Grady and Wells, Renton CoRenton CoB NE 4th & Monroe, Renton 71/72 Grady & Wells, Renton 77/78 Splice needed 4.3 Grady and Wells To Renton City Hall CoRenton CoR Grady & Wells, Renton 77/78 Splice needed 4.4 Renton City Hall To 116th CoRenton CoR Renton City Hall 273/274 116th 32/33 Splice needed 4.5 116th To Benson Hill Elementary CoRenton CoR 116th 32/33 Benson Hill Elementary 32/33 Splice needed 4.6 Benson Hill Elementary to Kent Vista Hub (Comcast Hub)CoRenton Benson Hill Elementary 32/33 Kent Vista Hub 32/33 Splice needed Galen Hirschi ghirschi@ci.kent.wa.us 253-856-4614 Galen Hirschi ghirschi@ci.kent.wa.us 253-856-4614 4.7 Kent Vista Hub to Kent City Hall CoK Comcast Kent Vista Hub 3/4 Kent City Hall 3/4 Galen Hirschi ghirschi@ci.kent.wa.us 253-856-4614 Galen Hirschi ghirschi@ci.kent.wa.us 253-856-4614 4.8 Kent City Hall to Kent EOC CoK Comcast Kent City Hall 47/48 Kent EOC 47/48 4.9 Kent EOC to Valley Com CoK Comcast Kent EOC 5/6 ValleyCom 5/6 Segment #5 Valley Com to Sabey 5.1 VCOM To Auburn City Hall CoAuburn CoA VCOM 11/12 Auburn City Hall 11/12 To Be Assigned by CoAuburn Ashley Riggs, CoA ariggs@auburnwa.gov (253) 288-3149 5.2 Auburn City Hall To KC-Inet Federal Way Hub KC INET Comcast Auburn City Hall KC-Inet Federal Way Hub To Be Assigned by KC Cheryl Wilder Cheryl.Wilder@kingcounty.gov 206.477.4421 Hanker Su Hanker.Su@kingcounty.gov (206) 263-7986 5.3 KC-Inet Federal Wayt Hub To Federal Way City Hall KC INET Comcast KC-Inet Federal Way Hub Federal Way City Hall Ports 53/54 To Be Assigned by KC 5.4 Federal Way City Hall To Sabey Tukwila Building 5, Room 133A CoFW Zayo Federal Way City Hall Ports 1/2 Sabey Bldg 5 Rm 133A Ports 37/38 To Be Assigned by CoFW Erik Earle Erik.Earle@cityoffederalway.com 5.5 Sabey Tukwila Building 5, Room 133A to King County Data Center KC-INET KC-INET Sabey Bldg 5 Rm 133A Sabey KCDC To Be Assigned by KC 5.6 King County Data Center to Building 2, Sabey Data Center KC-INET KC-INET To Be Assigned by KC Segment 6 Sabey Tukwila To Westin DLR003044 6.1 King County Data Center to Building 2, Sabey Data Center KC-INET KC-INET Sabey KCDC Sabey Bldg 5 Rm 133A To Be Assigned by KC 6.2 Sabey Tukwila Building 5, Room 133A to King County Data Center KC-INET KC-INET To Be Assigned by KC 6.3 Sabey Tukwila Building 2 To Westin UW UW Sabey Bldg 2/or 5-133A SDC P3 135/136 Westin WT-10.1 75/76 Assigned by UW Brenda Jones brendaj@uw.edu 206-221-4523 Brenda Jones brendaj@uw.edu 206-221-4523 C3 South Loop For data Compilation - King County GIS Contact: Cheryl Wilder (206) 477-4421, Cheryl.Wilder@kingcounty.gov Fiber Link No.Description Fiber Contributor Point A Point Z Fiber Line Status Contacts (name, phone & email) Fiber Route Details for GIS Mapping (Digital Spatial data set; ESRI, AC, text descriptor, or hardcopy) Fiber Link 1: Renton City Hall to Kent EOC Renton City Hall Kent EOC Fiber Link Segment 1-1 Renton City Hall To Kent EOC C3 (South End Members) To be designed by C3 South End Members Fiber Link 2: Kent EOC To VCOM Kent EOC VCOM Fiber Link Segment 2-1 Kent EOC To VCOM CoKent To Be Assigned by CoKent Fiber Link 3: VCOM To Auburn City Hall VCOM Auburn City Hall Fiber Link Segment 3-1 VCOM To Auburn City Hall CoAuburn To Be Assigned by CoAuburn Fiber Link 4: Auburn City Hall To Federal City Hall VCOM Federal City Hall Fiber Link Segment 4-1 Auburn City Hall to Federal City Hall C3 (South End Members) To be designed by C3 South End Members Fiber Link 5:Federal City Hall Sabey Tukwila Fiber Link Segment 5-1 Federal Way City Hall To Sabey Tukwila Building 5 CoFW via Zayo To Be Assigned by CoFW Fiber Link 6: Sabey Tukwila To Tukwila City Hall Sabey Tukwila Tukwila City Hall Fiber Link Segment 6-1 Sabey Tukwila Building 5 To Tukwila City Hall C3 (South End Members) To be designed by C3 South End Members Fiber Link 7: Tukwila City Hall To Renton City Hall Tukwila City Hall Renton City Hall Fiber Link Segment 7-1 Tukwila City Hall To Renton City Hall C3 (South End Members) To be designed by C3 South End Members GIS Contacts Technical ContactsPoint A Point Z Fiber Connection Options for C3 High Speed Ring and C3 South Loop C3 High Speed Ring This page intentionally left blank. Agenda Item: Consent Calendar – 7L_ TO: City Council DATE: June 21, 2016 SUBJECT: Naden Avenue Properties Surplus Consideration – Authorize SUMMARY: In 2006, the City began purchasing properties generally bordered by West Meeker Street, Highway 167, Willis Street, and the Interurban Trail. These properties are generally known as the Naden Properties. These properties were purchased in an effort to assemble a campus for a future Kent Aquatics Center. Following the completion of the aquatic center concept design process in July 2008, the City Council determined the project would not move forward due in part to the onset of the recession. As the region began to recover from the recession, the City began to seek alternative ways to provide a community aquatic facility. Currently, the City is in partnership with the YMCA to construct a facility that will include a community aquatic center. The Naden Properties (as identified by parcel number and on the map in the exhibits) are no longer needed for their originally intended purpose. An informational public meeting held in accordance with Chapter 3.12 of the Kent City Code will allow the Council to determine whether it wants to surplus these properties. EXHIBITS: List of parcel numbers and map attached RECOMMENDED BY: Parks and Human Services Committee 6/16/2016 YAY: Fincher, Budell NAY: BUDGET IMPACT: N/A MOTION: In accordance with Chapter 3.12 of the Kent City Code, schedule an informational public meeting in order to receive public comment to allow Council to determine whether the Naden Properties (collectively, and with some exceptions, the properties generally bordered by West Meeker Street, Highway 167, Willis Street, and the Interurban Trail) will be surplused. This page intentionally left blank. This page intentionally left blank. Agenda Item: Other Business – 8A_ TO: City Council DATE: June 21, 2016 SUBJECT: Zoning Code Amendment – Medical Marijuana Patient Cooperatives – Ordinance – Adopt SUMMARY: Recent changes in state law will introduce a new category of medical marijuana growing operation called a “patient cooperative,” replacing the existing category of “medical cannabis collective garden” beginning July 1, 2016. The new category will allow up to four qualifying patients and/or designated providers to form a “cooperative” in which marijuana can be collectively grown for personal, medical use of only the members of the cooperative. The Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board will have regulatory oversight of these cooperatives; however, the Board cannot register a cooperative where prohibited by a local zoning provision. A patient cooperative must be located within the domicile of one of its members; ergo, cooperatives may only exist in residential areas. The law does not specify that the domicile be owned by the member, meaning there is the potential for greater impacts to rental properties. Kent’s zoning code does not currently address this new category of patient cooperatives. The draft ordinance attached rectifies this by repealing the regulations related to collective gardens and adding a definition and similar zoning regulations for patient cooperatives as the Council has previously adopted for collective gardens. Given the potential impacts (particularly with respect to rental properties), as well as the administrative nature of this change (repealing one type of collective medical marijuana growing operation and replacing it with another), Planning staff recommended that this general category of land use remain prohibited in all zoning districts to the Land Use and Planning Board (“LUPB”), although staff did mention the availability of other possible options, if the LUPB wished to explore those. The LUPB declined to vote on other options, and recommended approval of staff’s recommendation after holding a public hearing on May 23, 2016. EXHIBITS: 1) Draft Ordinance 2) SEPA checklist 3) SEPA Decision Document 4) SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance RECOMMENDED BY: Economic and Community Development Committee YEA: Boyce, Budell NAY: BUDGET IMPACTS: None MOTION: Adopt Ordinance No. , amending Title 15 of the Kent City Code, related to medical marijuana patient cooperatives. This page intentionally left blank. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending Title 15 of the Kent City Code by repealing all sections pertaining to medical cannabis collective gardens, and adopting new regulations pertaining to medical marijuana patient cooperatives. RECITALS A. Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 5052, known as the “Cannabis Patient Protection Act,” was signed into law by Governor Inslee on April 24, 2015. This Act allows qualifying patients and/or designated providers who hold valid recognition cards to form a “cooperative” in which marijuana can be collectively grown for personal, medical use, beginning July 1, 2016. The Act also repeals the existing category of “collective gardens,” as defined in RCW 69.51A.085, effective as of July 1, 2016. B. Medical marijuana patient cooperatives are limited to four or fewer members; must be registered with the state Liquor and Cannabis Board; and must be located within the domicile of one of the members of the cooperative. C. Second Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill 2136, signed by Governor Inslee on June 30, 2015, further clarified that the Liquor and Cannabis Board must deny the registration of a proposed patient cooperative if the location is prohibited by local zoning ordinance. 1 Amend KCC 15.02 and 15.08 - Re: Patient Cooperatives D. Kent’s zoning code does not currently address this new category of patient cooperatives, requiring an amendment to the city code. E. On May 5, 2016, the City requested expedited review under RCW 36.70A.106 from the Washington State Department of Commerce regarding the City’s proposed code amendments. The Washington State Department of Commerce granted the request for expedited review on _______. No comments were received from State agencies. F. On May 9, 2016, staff gave an overview of these proposed amendments before the Economic and Community Development Committee. G. On May 9, 2016, during a workshop meeting, staff received authorization from the Land Use and Planning Board (“LUPB”) to draft an ordinance amending Kent’s zoning code to address collective gardens and patient cooperatives. H. On May 20, 2016, the City conducted and completed environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The City’s SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Nonsignficance for the proposed code amendments. I. On May 23, 2016, the LUPB held a public hearing to consider the recommendation of Planning staff. Staff did include additional information to the LUPB regarding the availability of options other than total prohibition, if the LUPB wished to explore those. The LUPB declined to vote on these other options, and at the close of the public hearing the LUPB moved by unanimous vote to recommend to the full City Council the adoption of the draft amendments, as presented by staff. 2 Amend KCC 15.02 and 15.08 - Re: Patient Cooperatives J. On June 13, 2016, the Economic and Community Development Committee considered the ordinance repealing the sections of city code pertaining to medical cannabis collective gardens and addressing the new category of patient cooperatives, and recommended approval of the ordinance, as proposed by staff and approved by the LUPB, but directed that matter be placed under “other business” on the Council agenda so that all Councilmembers would have a chance to discuss the matter prior to voting on it. The matter was subsequently considered by the full City Council at its June 21, 2016, meeting. K. While collective marijuana growing has never been authorized in Kent, the Kent Police Department (“KPD”) has investigated numerous illegal marijuana grow operations in housing units all over the City. KPD has noted that residential “grow houses” often pose multiple environmental concerns, including, but not limited to: excessive power consumption; increased mold and mildew; pervasive odors; and structural damage. L. Furthermore, these impacts are magnified by the fact that these grow houses are often rental units that are rendered uninhabitable after being used for the indoor growing and cultivation of marijuana. M. The City Council recognizes that approved medical uses of marijuana may provide relief to patients suffering from debilitating or terminal conditions, but because of the potential secondary impacts, the establishment of facilities for the collective growth, production, and processing of medical marijuana in residential units is not appropriate for any zoning district within the City. N. The City Council further understands that while the medical benefits of marijuana have been recognized by the state legislature, 3 Amend KCC 15.02 and 15.08 - Re: Patient Cooperatives marijuana remains a Schedule I controlled substance under both the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and the Washington State Uniform Controlled Substances Act (Chapter 69.50 RCW), and any possession and use of marijuana is still a violation of federal law. O. The City Council has determined that the passage of a permanent zoning code amendment that shall prohibit the establishment of residential medical marijuana patient cooperatives in all zoning districts of the City will serve the public health, safety and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE SECTION 1. – Findings of Fact. The recitals and findings of fact set forth above are adopted as the City Council’s findings supporting the passage of this ordinance. SECTION 2. - Repealer. Section 15.02.074 of the Kent City Code is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION 3. - Repealer. Section 15.08.290 of the Kent City Code is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION 4. - Amendment. Chapter 15.02 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended by adding a new section 15.02.326 to read as follows: Sec. 15.02.326 Patient cooperative, medical marijuana. Medical marijuana patient cooperative means a group of four or fewer qualifying patients and/or designated providers who share responsibility for producing and processing marijuana only for the medical 4 Amend KCC 15.02 and 15.08 - Re: Patient Cooperatives use of the members of the cooperative, pursuant to, and in accordance with, all the terms and conditions of RCW 69.51A.250, as now enacted or as subsequently amended. SECTION 5. - Amendment. Chapter 15.08 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended by adding a new section 15.08.295 to read as follows: Sec. 15.08.295 Patient cooperatives. A. Medical marijuana patient cooperatives, as defined in KCC 15.02.326, are prohibited in the following zoning districts: 1. All agricultural districts, including A-10 and AG; 2. All residential districts, including SR-1, SR-3, SR-4.5, SR-6, SR-8, MR-D, MR-T12, MR-T16, MR-G, MR-M, MR-H, MHP, PUD, MTC-1, MTC-2, and MCR; 3. All commercial districts, including NCC, CC, CC-MU, DC, DCE, DCE-T, CM-1, CM-2, GC, and GC-MU; 4. All industrial districts, including M1, M1-C, M2, and M3; and 5. Any new district established on or after July 1, 2016. B. Any violation of this section is declared to be a public nuisance per se, and shall be abated by the city attorney under applicable provisions of this code or state law, including, but not limited to, Chapter 1.04 KCC. 5 Amend KCC 15.02 and 15.08 - Re: Patient Cooperatives C. Nothing in this section is intended to authorize, legalize or permit the establishment or operation of a use that violates any city, county, state or federal law or statute. SECTION 6. – Severability. If any one or more section, subsection, or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 7. – Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering; or references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations. SECTION 8. – Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force on July 1, 2016, which is more than five days from and after its publication, as provided by law. SUZETTE COOKE, MAYOR ATTEST: SUE HANSON, INTERIM CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY 6 Amend KCC 15.02 and 15.08 - Re: Patient Cooperatives PASSED: day of , 2016. APPROVED: day of , 2016. PUBLISHED: day of , 2016. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. (SEAL) SUE HANSON, INTERIM CITY CLERK P:\Civil\Ordinance\Patient Cooperatives Ordinance.docx 7 Amend KCC 15.02 and 15.08 - Re: Patient Cooperatives This page intentionally left blank. This page intentionally left blank. This page intentionally left blank. BIDS This page intentionally left blank. REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES, COUNCIL, AND STAFF A. Council President B. Mayor C. Administration D. Economic & Community Development E. Operations F. Parks & Human Services G. Public Safety H. Public Works I. Regional Fire Authority J. Other K. Other This page intentionally left blank. Page 1 of 10 OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Derek Matheson, Chief Administrative Officer Phone: 253-856-5700 Fax: 253-856-6700 Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, WA. 98032-5895 DATE: 06/21/16 TO: Mayor Cooke Councilmembers FROM: Derek Matheson, Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: CAO Report for Tuesday, June 21, 2016 The Chief Administrative Officer’s report is intended to provide Council, staff and community an update on the activities of the City of Kent. ADMINISTRATION • Sue Hanson has taken the reins as interim city clerk following Ronald Moore’s resignation earlier this month. • The Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) met with the King County Flood Control District’s (KCFCD) facilitator for the Lower Russell Road Levee project to discuss design issues and a memorandum of understanding between the KCFCD. • The CAO continues to work with Parks Director Jeff Watling and Fire Chief Jim Schneider on the transition of fire facility maintenance responsibilities from the city to the regional fire authority. • The June 21 Public Safety Report to the city council will feature fireworks enforcement. This is the last year consumer fireworks are lawful in Kent. • New street name signs and poles are being installed in the Mill Creek historic district to stay in compliance with the United State Department of Transportation standard manual on uniform traffic control devices. The Mill Creek logo, created by the City of Kent Multimedia Department, will be displayed at the tip of each sign within the boundaries to help identify King County’s first historic neighborhood district outside the city of Seattle. ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • Economic Development o Staff attended the annual Center for Advanced Manufacturing in Puget Sound (CAMPS) meeting at the Emerald Downs in Auburn on June 9. The City of Kent was a sponsor and Mayor Cooke introduced Alaska Airlines CEO Brad Tilden and addressed attendees. o Staff attended a King County meeting of economic development managers where they were updated on PSRC’s progress on the regional economic strategy and king county metro. Staff is working with a peer group of other municipal economic development managers and King County’s economic development manager on a King Page 2 of 10 County specific data dashboard to monitor progress on key elements of regional economic competitiveness including: innovation, talent, an inclusive economy, transportation, and global trade. o Staff accompanied Mayor Cooke on a meeting with Chancellor Jean Floten of WGU Washington, which is now headquartered at Kent’s Creekside at Centerpoint office campus. o Staff is working with multimedia staff on an advertisement congratulating Boeing’s 100th anniversary, and celebrating the more than 50 years of outer space vehicle innovation which has taken place in Kent. o Green River College IT and web development students presented Economic Development with a beta version of a “Made in Kent” mapping website with the capability of showcasing Kent manufacturing companies as an intuitive business directory format. o Staff will attend a Port of Seattle Food Accelerator Exchange meeting June 16, 2016, where the Port will explore how it may work with the Food Innovation Network in their economic development goals. Meanwhile, the non-profit Project Feast has signed a lease in the former Perk-Up location in downtown Kent to create a commercial kitchen. The organization’s mission is to provide pathways of sustainable employment to refugees and immigrants through training and its catering business. o Staff met with a Californian-based real estate investment team interested in Kent east hill shopping centers, and supplied customized Buxton data to several end users interested in expanding their operations in Kent. • Permit Center o New Buildings, Commercial Alterations, and Inspections May/June 2016  New Commercial Building permits Issued • Star Rentals - valued at $106,680 • Grandview – valued at $1,044,441  From May 15 and June 15, between 46 and 49 inspections were performed a day.  Pre-Applications for proposed projects • Phillips Plat – Subdivide 9 SFR • Panther Lake Shopping Center for revitalization • Han Phan – Subdivide 1 lot to 4 • Kent Self-Storage to add additional units • Kent Midway for new multi-family apartment building with 246 units • Subdivide two parcels (5.85 acres) into 32 SFR lots. Property is located at 27115 and 27037 124th Ave SE • Tracy Subdivision – divide four parcels into 35 SFR lots. Property is located at 20815, 20822 and 20837 96th Pl S and 9631 S 208th. • Sahota Development - demolish the existing house and garage to develop the southern portion of the parcel to construct a gas station with other commercial space. The remaining half of the property is to remain undeveloped at this time. Property located at 2526 S 272nd St.  New Alterations • Way to Salvation – exterior work, canopies - $50,000 • Fred Meyer – upgrade space for new online grocery - $62,179 Page 3 of 10  New Resident construction – 22 homes valued at approx. $300,000 – 450,000 each; $18-24,000 will be collected in fees. FINANCE • The City’s 2016 Bond Refunding process has successfully come to a close. The final delivery, settlement, and closing procedures took place as scheduled on Wednesday morning, June 15. The City refunded two separate bonds, the City’s 2008 General Obligation bond and the City of Kent Public Facilities District’s 2008 Sales Tax bond. The savings generated from this refunding generated nearly $10.7 million over the life of the bonds. As required by City of Kent Ordinance, the City’s finance director will provide a final bond refunding update to the Operations Committee on June 21. • The State Auditor’s Office (SAO) has nearly completed their audit of the City’s 2015 financial statements. We are expecting SAO to issue the audit letter, required for submission of our Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) to the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) award program, on June 27. GFOA awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City of Kent for its CAFR for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. That was the 14th year the City had achieved this prestigious award. Prior to 2014, the city had received the GFOA award for the years ended 1994 through 2007, but had not applied since 2007. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a governmental unit must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized comprehensive annual financial report. This report must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe our current Comprehensive Annual Financial Report will meet the Certificate of Achievement requirements. HUMAN RESOURCES • Recruitment • Stephanie King will be proctoring the written exam for the Office Technician III position in the Permit Center Tuesday morning; 40 applicants were invited to test and there is a test session at 8:30 a.m. and another one at 11:00 a.m. • Natalie Winecka will be facilitating oral boards for Entry Level and Lateral PD June 14-16 at the police and fire training facility. • Interviews for the Business Strategy and Performance Analyst were Wednesday, June 15- four applicants have been invited to continue. • Interviews for the Program Manager/Business Analyst position in Information Technology (IT) were held last Thursday and Friday, so staff is working with IT on next steps for those positions. • Agenda items for the Civil Service Commission are due by 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday. Natalie will be preparing the agenda packet for the June 22 meeting and those will go out by Friday. • We have a number of new hires/promotions that are beginning June 16: Sabrina Littleton, Street/Storm Vegetation-Maintenance Worker II; Jake Sallee, Signal Tech In-Training; Drew Holcomb, Design Engineer II; and Tammy Gablehouse, Custodian. • Benefits o Leoff1 Disability Board will be offering respite care services to caregivers of Leoff1 retirees. Page 4 of 10 • Labor, Compensation & Classification o June 16 was the kick-off for AFSCME negotiations, participating in an Public Employment Relations Committee (PERC) led training on interest based bargaining and laying ground rules/selecting dates for negotiations. o June 18 was the kick-off for Teamster negotiations, laying ground rules, selecting comparable cities and setting up dates for bargaining. • Risk Management o Staff is meeting with our Alliant Insurance Services broker to review the July 1 property insurance renewal. o We expect the initial draft of liability and worker comp actuarial reports soon. These are based on results through 12/31/2015 and these reports will be updated after July 1 to reflect additional six months of loss data. MUNICIPAL COURT • School Zone Ticket update: Since adding 2 new schools in October 2015, the average number of ticket filed per month was 844. In May, 2016 alone, the court received 1,229 tickets. PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY SERVICES • Recreation o The USSSA Major Softball tournament was held June 9-12 at Hogan Park. Thirty-four teams from all over the country participated. Over 500 participants and 2,000 spectators stayed in Kent for the four day event. City of Kent Lodging Tax helped support the event. o Kent Parks Spring Youth Dance Recital was held this past weekend. This exciting event featured 212 teen, elementary, and pre-elementary aged dancers who performed in front of three sold out audiences of over 1,000 spectators at the Kent Meridian Performing Arts Center. The recital represents months of practice and preparation as students participate in this inclusive, healthy, and self-esteem building activity. As with all programs, financial aid is available for all youth residing within the City limits so that everyone may participate regardless of their family income or ability to pay. o Adaptive recreation athletes representing track and field and cycling competed this past week-end at the Special Olympics Summer Games. Kent’s athletes made us proud by earning numerous medals and ribbons in their events. o Registration opened for adaptive recreation summer classes on June 8. In less than four hours, 259 registrations were taken. During that period, half of the classes filled with waitlists and the remainder of the programs were at least 90% full. This is a clear demonstration of the significant need for these kinds of programs in our community. o This past quarter, Youth and Teen staff attended a variety of outreach events from elementary school family nights to hosting a booth at the International Festival. o The 2016 Summer Art Exhibit opened on Wednesday, June 8 with a reception in the Centennial Center Gallery from 6:30-8:00 p.m. Guests enjoyed light refreshments, compliments of sponsor Osborn/Machler, as well as a performance by Voices 4, a Page 5 of 10 vocal jazz quartet, and the opportunity to meet the exhibiting artists. Fifty-seven pieces by 20 artists will be on display through August 29. o A purchase jury met on the afternoon of June 8 to select artwork to purchase from the show for the City’s permanent collection, as well as artists to invite to have solo or shared exhibitions in the Centennial Gallery 2017-2018 season. The purchase jury consisted of professional artists Joseph Steininger and Humaira Abid who juried the show, Kent Arts Commissioner Susan Machler, City Councilmember Dana Ralph, and city staff person Tony Donati of the Senior Center. o Human Services staff attended a community reception hosted by the City of Seattle Mayor’s Office and the Office of Immigrant and Refugee Affairs to celebrate the White House’s efforts to support new Americans and Seattle’s immigrant and refugee communities. The reception was held after the White House Regional Convening on New Americans event. o Human Services staff was asked to join the Wisdom Council, a group of thought- leaders that advises Kent School District (KSD) on how to improve the academic outcomes for young men of color. These high school aged young men are predominantly of African American and Latino descent. One of the strategies that KSD is using to improve outcomes is through Men on the Move (MOTM), a mentoring group. The Wisdom Council will help steer the mentoring program by identifying speakers to talk to MOTM, supporting their leadership development and student voice, and helping them develop a stronger sense of self and belonging. A mentoring program will also be developed for young women. o Human Services staff attended the monthly meeting for Living Well Kent (LWK), a community driven coalition of residents, non-profits, businesses and government leaders who are committed to shared leadership and collaboratively working, learning and risking together for the common good of the Kent community. Staff will meet with the consultant on a monthly basis for co-mentoring and helping connect LWK to Kent resources, organizational cultural, and services. POLICE • Staff Changes - Hiring/Retirement/Recruitment/ Leaves/Promotions o Nine candidates have moved forward from oral boards to background checks for the Records positions. o Oral boards for lateral and entry level officers were held June 14-16. o Two final offers were extended to entry level officers. o Accounting Assistant Josh Jones is resigning, effective July 8. • Significant crime activities/arrests/investigations o On June 3, there was an attempted vehicle theft from the Kent Chamber of Commerce. A suspect was observed by alert Chamber employees, trying to steal a vehicle belonging to one of them. She was confronted by employees and fled south on Fourth Avenue South. The suspect was later located near the old Kent Elementary, across from the station, by a Sound Transit officer who was flagged down by a citizen. She was identified by a witnesses and it was later determined that she had dumped a key ring full of shaved keys, including the one she used during this incident, just in front of Mexico Lindo restaurant. Additionally, the backpack she had secreted in an alley off of Fourth Avenue contained several credit cards not Page 6 of 10 belonging to her and the shirt she had changed out of after fleeing. She was booked for vehicle trespass and possession of vehicle theft tools. o On June 4, officers responded to a reported stabbing at the Dollar Tree on Pacific Hwy South. The 54 year old male claimed that he had come out of the store when a male approached him and stabbed him in the neck. Fire responded, bandaged him up, and transported him to Harborview. Detectives responded to assist. Patrol located the 34 year old suspect who claimed that he had been praying to Jesus, when the victim shouted at him to stop praying. An argument ensued and the suspect cut the victim. The suspect was arrested and the victim was stitched up at the Hospital. The injury was not life threatening. o On June 4, at approximately 10:39 p.m., patrol was dispatched to the El Habanero Bar located on West Meeker Street in reference to a welfare check on a male who was requesting aid. Upon arrival, the door Security Guard approached responding officers and gave them a knife that was used by the suspect to stab two victims inside the bar. All parties were gone on arrival. Three involved parties showed up at Valley Medical Center with stab wounds to the torso. Video evidence showed two of those stabbed were victims, while the third was actually an accomplice to the main suspect. It appears this accomplice was hit by “friendly fire” during the altercation and was also stabbed. o On June 4, there was a vehicle theft from 112th and 269th. This incident created two calls for service as police and fire originally responded for a vehicle in Lake Meridian near the boat launch. The officer secured the boat and assisted fire in determining the vehicle was unoccupied and was about 75’ out in the lake. Around the same time a vehicle theft report was called in from the location listed above. The owner of the vehicle was in Las Vegas at the time of the theft, which was sometime the night prior to being found in the lake. Fire attached a cable to the vehicle and it was removed from the lake without incident by the responding tow company. o On June 6, around 2 a.m., officers were dispatched to the report of a physical assault occurring in the 22400 block of Benson Rd SE. While in route to the scene, officers learned the suspect was threatening to kill his girlfriend and himself and was possibly high on drugs. Once officers arrived, it was discovered that there was a no contact order between the suspect and victim. Officers also learned that the suspect may be armed with a pistol, but no pistol was seen. He also had a DOC warrant for escape. Both the suspect and victim did not have their cellphones on. We surrounded the residence and at one point the suspect walked out the front door. We called out to him and he closed the door on us. We attempted to call him out via PA and used a patrol NFDD (Noise Flash Distraction Device), but he did not respond. Based on his criminal history, unknown if the victim was injured inside and the possibility of a weapon being involved, SWAT was called out to the scene. The suspect’s criminal history showed convictions for order violation against the same victim, robbery and firearms violations. Once SWAT arrived, the suspect and victim decided to come out. Suspect was arrested and transported to King County Jail. The victim was uncooperative. A firearm was recovered inside the apartment. o On June 8, during a routine traffic stop on a vehicle for a non-operational stop lamp the driver fled from the vehicle, leaving his passenger behind. The officer saw a gun in the car and after removing the passenger he secured the vehicle. Through the investigation the officer was able to identify the driver and obtain a search warrant Page 7 of 10 on the car. The search yielded a loaded 9mm handgun. This case was referred to SIU (Special Investigations Unit) for follow-up. o On June 8, officers were dispatched to a suspicious subject in a vehicle parked in a city park. When the officer frisked the driver he located a stolen handgun in his waistband. The subject was arrested for violation of the Uniform Firearms Act (VUFA). o On June 10, a suspect was speeding down 104th Ave SE, when patrol attempted to pull him over. The 35 year old suspect fled as the officer pursued. A couple of Pursuit Immobilization Technique maneuvers were attempted and the suspect was ultimately apprehended. The suspect had two prior convictions for Driving Under the Influence and he was Driving While License Suspended, 1st degree. There were no reported injuries, but the patrol cars involved received minor damages. o On June 12, an inmate who is a maximum security high violent inmate was told to get out of the shower so he could be returned to his cell. He claimed that he could not get his pants on, due to being handcuffed. Correctional Sergeant told him that he could put his pants on when he returned to his cell. The inmate opened the door to the shower, stared at the Sergeant and then tried to hit him with his elbow. The Sergeant ducked the blow by his elbow and the inmate had to be contained. He was then returned to his cell. The inmate has already assaulted several inmates and that is why he is in max-status. o A suicide subject texted several friends and family members mid-day on Monday, June 13 stating his intention to kill himself. He was said to be alone inside and had access to a rifle. He was the focus of a recent child molestation case with Kent. As police set up containment on the house a muffled bang noise was heard from the direction of the house in question. Detectives responded to further investigate possible harassment and VUFA on the subject in an attempt to get a warrant for residence. PA and phone contact went unanswered and a NFDD was deployed without effect. Patrol ended up doing recon of house exterior and could observe feet of a male subject who appeared to be lying on living room floor. Patrol units made entry to check on subject and found him obviously deceased from a self-inflicted shot gun wound to the head. • Major emphasis patrol o From May 23 - June 5, patrol participated in the National Click it or Ticket seat belt enforcement campaign. o On June 4, Kent hosted a multi-agency Auto Theft Emphasis. The cities of Auburn, Tukwila, Des Moines, Auburn and the WA Auto Theft Task Force all met in Kent to locate and arrest the High Impact Offender Auto Thieves in Kent and Des Moines. Several stolen vehicles were recovered and several arrests were made. o The Special Operations Unit (SOU) spent a lot of time on the water the past few weekends. We replaced and reset about 18 buoys, and set up the swim area at Lake Meridian. We began weekend boat patrols Memorial Day weekend. Numerous vessel inspections were completed and there were no incidents on the water. o SOU worked with the Parks Dept. and Corrections to clean up a large transient camp along Naden Ave, as well as another camp on South Central Ave, where one subject was arrested for illegal camping, trespassing and failing to register as a Sex Offender. SOU also conducted extra patrols along the Kent Valley Loop Trail and all Page 8 of 10 the way up to 180th. We made several contacts and received many ‘Thanks” for being on the trail from citizens. o SOU worked with the Parks Department in regards to numerous vehicle break-ins near Kent Memorial Park. SOU spent a lot of extra time there and we will continue to monitor the area. Page 9 of 10 • Events and awards o On June 3, several members of the department participated in the Law Enforcement Torch Run (5.1 miles) in support of the Special Olympics. o On June 3, Officers Bigler and Birkhofer participated in the Relay For Life event. o Citizens Academy Graduation was June 8. o On June 11, KPD supported Kent School District with traffic control and security for high school graduation ceremonies and there were no issues. o On June 12, Commander O’Reilly, Commander Durham, and Sergeant Schanbacher were honored at the Sikh Temple in Renton for their assistance at the Khalsa Day Festival at the Showare Center on May 21. o Our next community meeting is scheduled for June 22 at Kent Elementary. Guardian One will be presenting. o Officers Ferguson and Birkhofer attended a Cub Scout bike rodeo, where they assisted in teaching the kids proper bicycle hand signals and basic riding skills. They also attended the Neely O’Brien school carnival. Both these events went well and they were well received and made a positive impact on the kids. PUBLIC WORKS • Street concrete crews are paving 3rd Ave S, doing sidewalk repairs on Reiten Road, replacing a sidewalk in front of 413 W Titus St. and grinding in residential areas in the northeast section of the City at SE 212th, SE 204th, SE 202nd. • The Signs and Markings crews will be power brooming edge lines for painting citywide, installing banners and setting out notice signs for Cornucopia Days and cleaning traffic circles at multiple locations throughout the City. • Vegetation crews will be working on streetscapes at 4th and Willis, Hawley Rd and West Valley, Reith Road, the Armory and the SE 277th corridor from 108th Ave SE to 116th Ave SE. Side-arm mowers are out throughout the City. • The water department is doing an emergency repair at the Mill Creek (Auburn) Bridge. This crossing houses a 12-inch water main that supplies the southern portion of our water system. Crews are also performing chlorine injections and purities for the water main at James Street followed by water service installations. • Storm crews will be assessing and cleaning catch basins in multiple locations of the City and will be digging and re-establishing a ditch along Military Road. • Sewer crews are cleaning storm lines from James St. to E Walnut and Scenic Way/Kennebeck to 100th and another crew will be raising manholes in various locations that have been discovered buried throughout city easements. • Fleet and Warehouse crews are working on setting up new equipment, police vehicles, Traffic Dept. Interceptor, Water truck F450, Water locate rig (parts in transit), two Parks Maintenance Flatbed F450’s and sending 4 Police Patrol cars to collision repair vendors from PIT maneuver damages. • Design o 224th St. Phase 2 – 30% design and right-of-way plans for the roadway are being prepared. Page 10 of 10 o 228th/Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation – Environmental Justice Memo has been approved and NEPA is current. Appraisals have been completed on 3 parcels. Relocation plan is approved. Preparing to make offer to AMB. SEPA documents were submitted to the planning dept. on May 2. ICF prepared a Conceptual Mitigation Plan sent to planning. A Cert 3 request has been sent to WSDOT for phase 1 work. Working with utility companies on relocations, and working with Union Pacific railroad on agreement/licenses. VE Study was conducted June 14-16. o Briscoe-Desimone Levee – Otak submitted draft design of Reach 1 plantings. Coordinating with City of Tukwila on planting plan. o 277th St. Auburn Project – The City of Auburn opened bids and Scarsella Brothers Constuction was low bidder at $5,492,099.50. Auburn plans to award the project on June 20 and start construction around July 18. Auburn will need to obtain permits for traffic control and lane revisions within Kent city limits. • Land Survey o Construction Surveying: James St., Central Ave., Kent Regional Trails o Topographic Mapping: South Reach Levee, Downtown Sidewalks, Morrill Meadows, 208th St. o Right of Way: 228th/224th E. Leg, Mill Creek Rehabilitation, 228th St./Union Pacific Railroad • Construction o Central Ave S. Pavement Preservation and Utility Improvements: The regrinding and paving in the intersection of 259th and Central is scheduled for the week of June 13 during the day. o Armstrong Springs Generator: Shelter installation is complete but waiting upon receipt of some outstanding electrical materials. o James St. Pump Station: The contract’s required closure of James Street is scheduled to begin on the night of Friday, June 24 at 7 p.m. During this period, the contractor will work 12-hr days with multiple crews with the expectation to have the work completed and the road opened on Friday, July 1. o 2016 Asphalt Overlays: Concrete flatwork is complete at the Lakeside neighborhood Paving for this area is currently scheduled for the week of June 17 after school is out for the summer. o James Street Improvements – Water main and Landscaping: Water main installation between Alvord Ave N and 94th Ave S is complete; Planter strip work (including the irrigation system) on the North side of James street is ongoing; A 24-hr curb lane closure is being implemented during weekdays on the North side of James Street between 98th Ave S and Summit Ave N to accommodate this work and enhance public safety. o Kent Regional Trails Connector: The contract for this project has been fully executed with Pivetta Brothers Construction, Inc. from Sumner, WA. The Preconstruction Meeting took place Wednesday, June 8. o 2016 Guardrail Repairs: Contract work will proceed on Monday, June 20. o Mill Creek Side Channel / Leber Homestead Property: Excavation and soil mixing activities have begun. Contaminated soil excavation and export will begin by the end of this week. Page 11 of 10 o Pacific Highway Median Planting Project: Excavation and export of the exiting planter material began on Monday, June 13. o 2016 Crack Sealing: This contract has been executed to BCV, Inc from Burbank, WA. The Preconstruction Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, June 23. o West Valley Highway Bridge Repair: We have an “urgent” bridge repair on West Valley HWY at S 261st St. Sheet piles were installed on Monday, June 13 to shore up the structure and contain migrating soils. Backfilling all voids left by the failure that resulted in this effort will take place followed by replacing the existing water main that crosses the bridge followed by repairing the existing guardrail and paving. • Transportation o The SR509 Steering Committee met this week to discuss potential scenarios for the layout of the project. The remaining scenarios all have full access to Veteran’s Drive. Staff emphasized the desire to retain Poulsbo RV in Kent after the project is complete. o Staff presented a draft Complete Streets ordinance to Public Works Committee and Economic and Community Development Committee, and held a public hearing with the Land Use and Planning Board. If adopted, the ordinance will require staff to consider all users of the transportation system (pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicle drivers, etc.) in the planning and design of road projects. o Staff met with King County Metro Transit to review potential Route 150 traffic signal operational improvements. o Staff investigated the school zone equipment on 124th Ave SE to determine that it is not causing false triggers to the photo enforcement devices. • Environmental o Staff is participating in the Flood Control District Technical Committee meeting where the proposed 2017 budget will be presented. o Staff is participating in the FEMA webinar on remapping of Green River flood hazard areas not protected by levees. o Staff is working with construction engineering on the disposal of contaminated materials from the Leber Backchannel. o Staff is coordinating the review of 90% plans on North Fork of Garrison Ck/S. 212th St. Erosion Repair Project. # # # This page intentionally left blank. EXECUTIVE SESSION ACTION AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION