HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Committees - Operations Committee - 11/06/2018
Unless otherwise noted, the Operations Committee meets at 4 p.m. on the first and third
Tuesday of each month in Kent City Hall, Council Chambers East, 220 Fourth Avenue South,
Kent, WA 98032.
For additional information please contact Cathie Everett at 253-856-5705, or via email at
CEverett@KentWA.gov.
Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City Clerk’s Office at
253-856-5725 in advance. For TDD relay service call Washington Telecommunications Relay
Service at 7-1-1.
Operations Committee
Agenda
Chair - Les Thomas
Bill Boyce– Dennis Higgins
Cathie Everett, Committee Secretary
Tuesday, November 6, 2018
3:30 p.m.
Item Description Action Speaker Time
1. Call to Order Chair 01 MIN.
2. Roll Call Chair 01 MIN.
3. Changes to the Agenda Chair 01 MIN.
4. Approval of October 16, 2018
Minutes
YES Chair 05 MIN.
5. Approval of Check Summary
Report Dated 10/1/2018 to
10/15/2018
YES Chair 05 MIN.
6. Interagency Agreement to Fund
DUI Court
YES Sara Watson 05 MIN.
7. Public Hearing on Regional Fire
Authority CIP Update
YES Hayley Bonsteel and
Larry Rabel
05 MIN.
8. Ordinance to update Regional
Fire Authority Capital
Improvement Plan & Fire Impact
Fees
YES Hayley Bonsteel and
Larry Rabel
05 MIN.
9. Ordinances Amend Comp Plan &
City Code for School Dist Capital
Facilities Plans & School Impact
Fees
YES Hayley Bonsteel 05 MIN.
10. Utility Tax Sunset & Allocation
Ordinance - Recommend
YES Aaron BeMiller 15 MIN.
11. B & O Tax Amendment
Ordinance - Recommend
YES Aaron BeMiller 10 MIN.
Operations Committee CC Ops Special Meeting November 6, 2018
12. Comprehensive Plan Amendment
for 2019-2024 CIP Ordinance
YES Aaron BeMiller 05 MIN.
13. Property Tax Levy Ordinance -
Recommend
YES Aaron BeMiller 05 MIN.
14. 2019-2020 Budget Adoption
Ordinance - Recomment
YES Aaron BeMiller 10 MIN.
15. Adjournment Chair 01 MIN.
Page 1 of 4
Pending Approval
Operations Committee
CC Ops Regular Meeting
Minutes
October 16, 2018
Date: October 16, 2018
Time: 4:00 PM
Place: Chambers East
Attending: Les Thomas, Committee Chair
Bill Boyce, Councilmember
Dennis Higgins, Councilmember
Cathie Everett, Committee
Secretary
Agenda:
1. Call to Order 4:04 PM
2. Roll Call
Attendee Name Title Status Arrived
Les Thomas Committee Chair Present
Bill Boyce Councilmember Present
Dennis Higgins Councilmember Present
Cathie Everett Committee Secretary Present
3. Changes to the Agenda
Added check summary report dated 9/1/18 to 9/15/18 to be approved with
item 5 on the agenda.
4. Approval of Minutes dated September 18, 2018
MOTION: Move to approve the Minutes dated September 18, 2018
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Dennis Higgins, Councilmember
SECONDER: Bill Boyce, Councilmember
AYES: Thomas, Boyce, Higgins
5. Approval of Check Summary Reports dated 9/1/18 to 9/15/18 and
9/16/2018 to 9/30/2018
Motion: Move to approve check summary reports dated 9/1/18 to 9/15/18
and 9/16/18 to 9/30/18.
4
Packet Pg. 3
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
O
c
t
1
6
,
2
0
1
8
4
:
0
0
P
M
(
O
P
E
N
S
E
S
S
I
O
N
)
Operations Committee CC Ops Regular Meeting
Minutes
October 16, 2018
Kent, Washington
Page 2 of 4
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Bill Boyce, Councilmember
SECONDER: Dennis Higgins, Councilmember
AYES: Thomas, Boyce, Higgins
6. 2018 Court Commissioner - Temporary Limited Term Position
Judge Glenn Phillips and Court Administrator Margaret Yetter requested
authorization to establish a temporary, limited-term position of Court
Commissioner for Mike Franz for November and December 2018 to help with
his transition to judge. The position will be funded out of the Municipal
Court's current budget.
MOTION: Establish a temporary limited term position of Court
Commissioner, to be funded out of the Municipal Court budget, with
an end date of December 31, 2018.
RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Dennis Higgins, Councilmember
SECONDER: Bill Boyce, Councilmember
AYES: Thomas, Boyce, Higgins
7. Asset Management System Contract with Azteca Systems & Woolpert
- Recommend
IT Project Manager Melissa Jansen, Public Works Systems Analyst Levin
Conway and Systems Integration Development Manager Somen Palit
presented a request to approve the contracts for the asset management
replacement project. The new platform replaces the current platform which is
at its useful end of life and is no longer supported by the vendor. The new
system will automate many manual processes and streamline workflow
processes.
Council President Boyce asked how many systems this will replace. It will
currently only replace the one system but has the ability to replace others as
they reach end of life. There will be about an 18 month configuration and
testing process prior to final roll-out. Chair Thomas asked about the
$200,000 difference in the previously approved budget amount. The
additional $200,000 is a contingency budget due to the need for two phased
"go-lives" as well as for the replacement of hardware that has seen an
increase in cost since the original budget was approved in 2015.
Councilmember Higgins requested that updates be presented as major
milestones are reached during the 18 month replacement process.
MOTION: Recommend Council authorize the Mayor to sign all
necessary documents to enter into agreements with Azteca Systems,
LLC and Woolpert Consultants Inc. to purchase, install, and configure
the Cityworks software in a total amount not to exceed $883,000,
4
Packet Pg. 4
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
O
c
t
1
6
,
2
0
1
8
4
:
0
0
P
M
(
O
P
E
N
S
E
S
S
I
O
N
)
Operations Committee CC Ops Regular Meeting
Minutes
October 16, 2018
Kent, Washington
Page 3 of 4
subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the Information
Technology Director and the City Attorney.
RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Bill Boyce, Councilmember
SECONDER: Dennis Higgins, Councilmember
AYES: Thomas, Boyce, Higgins
8. Ordinance Amending Kent City Code 5.01 Relating to Business
Licenses – Recommend
Customer Service Manager Patty Roseto presented an ordinance to amend
city code 5.01 relating to business licenses in order to comply with state
legislation passed in 2017. These ordinance provisions must be adopted by
the end of 2018.
MOTION: Recommend Council adopt an ordinance amending
Section 5.01.020 of the Kent City Code, entitled “Definitions” to
add a definition of “engaging in business,” and amending Section
5.01.040, entitled “General business license required,” to add a
new section, “Threshold exemption,” to exempt certain persons
and businesses from general business registration and licensing
requirements as presented by staff.
RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Dennis Higgins, Councilmember
SECONDER: Bill Boyce, Councilmember
AYES: Thomas, Boyce, Higgins
9. Director's Report
Finance Director Aaron BeMiller reported that the formal exit conference with
SAO has been held, which ended the 2017 audit. We had a very successful
audit with no findings or management letter items. There were four
housekeeping items identified that have already been addressed.
BeMiller also presented the August 2018 financial report. We currently have
$22.6 million in unreserved general fund balance. Over the next month
Finance will be looking closely at the revenue and expenditure numbers
compared to 2017 to determine if there are reasons for the variances that
are currently showing or whether it is just a matter of timing with
expenditures and revenues coming in at different times than in the previous
year. Next month we plan to have stronger projections of where we will end
the year as well as answers to the questions regarding the yearly revenue
and expenditure variances.
10. Adjournment 4:30 PM
Committee Chair Thomas adjourned the meeting at 4:30 PM.
4
Packet Pg. 5
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
O
c
t
1
6
,
2
0
1
8
4
:
0
0
P
M
(
O
P
E
N
S
E
S
S
I
O
N
)
Operations Committee CC Ops Regular Meeting
Minutes
October 16, 2018
Kent, Washington
Page 4 of 4
Cathie Everett
Committee Secretary
4
Packet Pg. 6
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
O
c
t
1
6
,
2
0
1
8
4
:
0
0
P
M
(
O
P
E
N
S
E
S
S
I
O
N
)
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
Derek Matheson, Chief Administrative Officer
220 Fourth Ave S
Kent, WA 98032
256-856-5712
DATE: November 6, 2018
TO: Operations Committee
SUBJECT: Approval of Check Summary Report Dated 10/1/2018 to
10/15/2018
MOTION: Move to approve the check summary report dated 10/1/2018 to
10/15/2018.
SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL:
Sustainable Services
RECOMMENDED BY: Aaron BeMiller
5
Packet Pg. 7
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
Derek Matheson, Chief Administrative Officer
220 Fourth Ave S
Kent, WA 98032
256-856-5712
DATE: November 6, 2018
TO: Operations Committee
SUBJECT: Interagency Agreement to Fund DUI Court
MOTION: Move to recommend council authorize the Mayor to sign an
interagency agreement to fund a DUI court, signed by the Presiding Judge,
between the Washington Traffic Safety Commission and Kent Municipal
Court, subject to final contract terms and conditions acceptable to the city
attorney and Kent Municipal Court.
SUMMARY: On June 21, 2016, the Operations Committee indicated its support
for the establishment of a DUI court at the Kent Municipal Court (KMC). The
KMC wishes to enter into an interagency agreement with the Washington Traffic
Safety Commission for grant funding for the DUI court. The grant funds will be
used to cover operational costs of the DUI court for the period of October 1,
2018 through September 30, 2019, and will reimburse expenses of Kent
Municipal Court, city prosecutors and probation officers.
The current grant fund request is for $91,500 and will cover the following items:
$10,000.00: Alcohol and Drug Assessments
$36,520.00: Urinalysis Testing equipment and sample testing
$2000.00: Bus passes and transportation costs; DUI Victim’s
Impact Panel; MRT Therapy; and other life skill services
$15,480.00: Interpreter costs
$27,500.00: Non-benefited 24hr per week employee to assist with
UA collection and case management
BUDGET IMPACT: None for 2018-2019.
SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL:
Thriving City
RECOMMENDED BY: Pat Fitzpatrick
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Interagency_Agreement_18440007_ (PDF)
6
Packet Pg. 8
6.a
Packet Pg. 9
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
_
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
_
1
8
4
4
0
0
0
7
_
(
1
4
4
0
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
F
u
n
d
D
U
I
C
o
u
r
t
)
6.a
Packet Pg. 10
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
_
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
_
1
8
4
4
0
0
0
7
_
(
1
4
4
0
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
F
u
n
d
D
U
I
C
o
u
r
t
)
6.a
Packet Pg. 11
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
_
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
_
1
8
4
4
0
0
0
7
_
(
1
4
4
0
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
F
u
n
d
D
U
I
C
o
u
r
t
)
6.a
Packet Pg. 12
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
_
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
_
1
8
4
4
0
0
0
7
_
(
1
4
4
0
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
F
u
n
d
D
U
I
C
o
u
r
t
)
6.a
Packet Pg. 13
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
_
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
_
1
8
4
4
0
0
0
7
_
(
1
4
4
0
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
F
u
n
d
D
U
I
C
o
u
r
t
)
6.a
Packet Pg. 14
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
_
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
_
1
8
4
4
0
0
0
7
_
(
1
4
4
0
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
F
u
n
d
D
U
I
C
o
u
r
t
)
6.a
Packet Pg. 15
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
_
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
_
1
8
4
4
0
0
0
7
_
(
1
4
4
0
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
F
u
n
d
D
U
I
C
o
u
r
t
)
6.a
Packet Pg. 16
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
_
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
_
1
8
4
4
0
0
0
7
_
(
1
4
4
0
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
F
u
n
d
D
U
I
C
o
u
r
t
)
6.a
Packet Pg. 17
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
_
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
_
1
8
4
4
0
0
0
7
_
(
1
4
4
0
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
F
u
n
d
D
U
I
C
o
u
r
t
)
6.a
Packet Pg. 18
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
_
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
_
1
8
4
4
0
0
0
7
_
(
1
4
4
0
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
F
u
n
d
D
U
I
C
o
u
r
t
)
6.a
Packet Pg. 19
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
_
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
_
1
8
4
4
0
0
0
7
_
(
1
4
4
0
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
F
u
n
d
D
U
I
C
o
u
r
t
)
6.a
Packet Pg. 20
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
_
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
_
1
8
4
4
0
0
0
7
_
(
1
4
4
0
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
F
u
n
d
D
U
I
C
o
u
r
t
)
6.a
Packet Pg. 21
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
_
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
_
1
8
4
4
0
0
0
7
_
(
1
4
4
0
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
F
u
n
d
D
U
I
C
o
u
r
t
)
6.a
Packet Pg. 22
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
_
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
_
1
8
4
4
0
0
0
7
_
(
1
4
4
0
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
F
u
n
d
D
U
I
C
o
u
r
t
)
6.a
Packet Pg. 23
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
_
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
_
1
8
4
4
0
0
0
7
_
(
1
4
4
0
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
F
u
n
d
D
U
I
C
o
u
r
t
)
6.a
Packet Pg. 24
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
_
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
_
1
8
4
4
0
0
0
7
_
(
1
4
4
0
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
F
u
n
d
D
U
I
C
o
u
r
t
)
6.a
Packet Pg. 25
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
_
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
_
1
8
4
4
0
0
0
7
_
(
1
4
4
0
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
F
u
n
d
D
U
I
C
o
u
r
t
)
6.a
Packet Pg. 26
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
_
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
_
1
8
4
4
0
0
0
7
_
(
1
4
4
0
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
F
u
n
d
D
U
I
C
o
u
r
t
)
6.a
Packet Pg. 27
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
_
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
_
1
8
4
4
0
0
0
7
_
(
1
4
4
0
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
F
u
n
d
D
U
I
C
o
u
r
t
)
6.a
Packet Pg. 28
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
_
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
_
1
8
4
4
0
0
0
7
_
(
1
4
4
0
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
F
u
n
d
D
U
I
C
o
u
r
t
)
SIGNER(S)
www.signority.com
Au dit Trail
6.a
Packet Pg. 29
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
_
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
_
1
8
4
4
0
0
0
7
_
(
1
4
4
0
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
F
u
n
d
D
U
I
C
o
u
r
t
)
HISTORY
This audit trail report provides a detailed
recorded for this contract.
www.signority.com
Audit Trail
6.a
Packet Pg. 30
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
_
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
_
1
8
4
4
0
0
0
7
_
(
1
4
4
0
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
F
u
n
d
D
U
I
C
o
u
r
t
)
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
Derek Matheson, Chief Administrative Officer
220 Fourth Ave S
Kent, WA 98032
256-856-5712
DATE: November 6, 2018
TO: Operations Committee
SUBJECT: Public Hearing on Regional Fire Authority CIP Update
Hayley Bonsteel and Larry Rabel will provide a brief staff report. The committee will
then accept public comments of up to three minutes per person.
SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL:
Inclusive Community
7
Packet Pg. 31
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
Derek Matheson, Chief Administrative Officer
220 Fourth Ave S
Kent, WA 98032
256-856-5712
DATE: November 6, 2018
TO: Operations Committee
SUBJECT: Ordinance to update Regional Fire Authority Capital
Improvement Plan & Fire Impact Fees
MOTION: Recommend City Council adopt an ordinance updating the Capital
Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan and to incorporate the
Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority’s Capital Improvement Plan with
updated Fire Impact Fees.
SUMMARY: Kent City Code authorizes fire impact fees in Chapter 12.15, pursuant
to Chapter 82.02 RCW. The impact fee shall be based on the capital facilities and
equipment plan developed by RFA and approved by the RFA governing board; the
plan is adopted by reference as part of the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent
Comprehensive Plan. The Committee is asked to move on this item at the public
hearing on November 6, 2018.
BUDGET IMPACT: N/A
SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL:
Inclusive Community, Thriving City
RECOMMENDED BY: Kurt Hanson
ATTACHMENTS:
1. CompPlanAmend-Fire Impact Fees2018 with Exhibit (PDF)
8
Packet Pg. 32
1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority
Fire Impact Fees
1
ORDINANCE NO.________
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, amending the Kent
Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities
Element to include the Capital Facilities Plan of the
Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority (CPA-2018-6).
RECITALS
A. The State of Washington Growth Management Act (GMA)
requires internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements and the
plans from other jurisdictions.
B. Chapter 82.02 RCW authorizes the collection of impact fees
only for public facilities included in the capital facilities element of a city’s
adopted comprehensive land use plan.
C. The City of Kent has established procedures for amending the
Comprehensive Plan in Chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code (KCC), and the
City Council may hold any required public hearings instead of the Land Use
and Planning Board. KCC 2.57.040.
8.a
Packet Pg. 33
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority
Fire Impact Fees
2
D. The City Council recognizes that the Kent Fire Department
Regional Fire Authority has recently been renamed as the “Puget Sound
Regional Fire Authority.” The Council understands that the entity itself
remains the same and intends that the Kent City Code referring to the Kent
Fire Department Regional Fire Authority remain applicable to the entity
despite the name change until such time as the Code may be amended.
E. The Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority adopted amendments
to its Capital Facilities Plan, and has proposed that this be included in the
current amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the City’s
Comprehensive Land Use Plan.
F. On ____________, 2018, the City Council of the City of Kent
approved the Capital Facilities Element amendment CPA-2018-6 to include
the Capital Facilities Plan of the Kent Fire Department Regional Fire
Authority, as set forth in Exhibit “A” attached and incorporated by this
reference.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT,
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE
SECTION 1. - Amendment. The Kent Comprehensive Plan, and its
Capital Facilities Element, are hereby amended to include the Capital
Facilities Plan of the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority and its impact fees
as provided therein, as set forth in Exhibit “A” attached and incorporated by
this reference (CPA-2018-6).
8.a
Packet Pg. 34
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
3 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority
Fire Impact Fees
3
SECTION 2. – Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon
approval of the City Attorney, the City Clerk and the code reviser are
authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the
correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering; or
references to other local, state or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations.
SECTION 3. – Severability. If any one or more section, subsection,
or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, that
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance
and that remaining portion shall maintain its full force and effect.
SECTION 4. – Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be
in force thirty days from and after its passage, as provided by law.
DANA RALPH, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KIMBERLEY KOMOTO, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________
ARTHUR “PAT” FITZPATRICK, CITY ATTORNEY
8.a
Packet Pg. 35
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
4 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority
Fire Impact Fees
4
PASSED: day of , 2018.
APPROVED: day of , 2018.
PUBLISHED: day of , 2018.
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No.
passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and
approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated.
_____ (SEAL)
KIMBERLEY KOMOTO, CITY CLERK
P:\Civil\Ordinance\CompPlanAmend-Fire Impact Fees.docx
8.a
Packet Pg. 36
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
Puget Sound Regional
Fire Authority
Capital Improvement Plan Update
2018 - 2023
EXHIBIT A 8.a
Packet Pg. 37
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
2 | P a g e
EXHIBIT A 8.a
Packet Pg. 38
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
3 | P a g e
Six-Year Capital Facilities & Equipment Plan
2018-2023
Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority
This Plan was prepared and implemented through the collaboration and work of the following and
their associates:
Fire Chief
Mathew Morris
Finance Manager
Margaret Martin
Deputy Chief
Eric Tomlinson
Deputy Chief
Brian Wiwel
Division Chief
Mark Jones, Pat Pawlak, Larry Rabel
District Chief
Kevin Garling, Jeff Richardson, Roger Kacmarcik, Kraig Peiguss
Battalion Chief
Ed Johnson, Sean Penwell
Business Analyst
Sameer Ahmed
Deployment Dynamics Group LLC
Governance Board Members
Fire District 37
Allan Barrie
Harry George
Margaret Harto
City of Kent
Bill Boyce
Dennis Higgins
Les Thomas
City of Covington
Sean Smith
City of SeaTac
Erin Sitterley
EXHIBIT A 8.a
Packet Pg. 39
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
4 | P a g e
Table of Contents
1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 7
2 Background and Demographics ............................................................................................. 9
2.1 SeaTac Service Area ................................................................................................... 10
3 Community Growth and Impacts of Growth 2018 – 2023 ................................................. 10
3.1 Impacts of Future Growth.......................................................................................... 11
3.1.1 Growth Remains Consistent with the 2014 – 2033 Master CFEP .................. 11
4 Current Capital Resources .................................................................................................... 11
4.1 Influence of Public Protection Class Rating (PPC) ................................................. 11
4.1.1 Limitations of Deployed Resources to Preserve PPC ................................ 12
4.2 Fixed Facilities ............................................................................................................ 13
4.2.1 Fire Stations ................................................................................................... 13
4.2.2 Support Facilities ......................................................................................... 13
4.2.3 Roadways - 72nd Ave South ......................................................................... 13
4.3 Mobile Resources....................................................................................................... 15
4.3.1 Apparatus Life Cycle Policy ......................................................................... 15
4.3.2 Fire Engines .................................................................................................. 15
4.3.3 Quints ............................................................................................................ 15
4.3.4 Ladder Trucks ............................................................................................... 15
4.3.5 Aid Cars ......................................................................................................... 16
4.3.6 Command and Staff Vehicles ....................................................................... 16
4.4 Equipment................................................................................................................. 16
5 Standards of Service .............................................................................................................. 16
5.1 Time and Origin of Standards.................................................................................. 16
5.2 Emergency response ................................................................................................ 16
5.3 Benchmark / Baseline Gap Performance and Relation to Staffing ....................... 17
5.4 Components of Response Performance .................................................................. 17
5.4.1 Alarm Handling Time ................................................................................... 17
5.4.2 Turnout Time ................................................................................................ 17
5.4.3 Drive Time .................................................................................................... 17
5.4.4 At Patient Side or Water on Fire ................................................................. 17
5.5 Deployment and Measures of Response Resources .............................................. 18
5.5.1 Distribution ................................................................................................... 18
5.5.2 Concentration ............................................................................................... 18
5.6 Benchmark and Baseline Level of Service Objectives: .......................................... 19
5.6.1 Community Risk Types ................................................................................ 19
5.6.2 Performance Measured ................................................................................ 19
5.6.3 Performance Expectations........................................................................... 19
5.6.4 Resource Capacity .......................................................................................... 21
6 PSF Service Level Performance ............................................................................................ 21
6.1 Response Performance Findings ................................................................................ 21
6.1.1 Reliability Measure ...................................................................................... 21
EXHIBIT A 8.a
Packet Pg. 40
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
5 | P a g e
6.1.2 Reliability & Mutual Aid ............................................................................... 22
7 Conclusion of Need for Capital Resources 2018 – 2023 ..................................................... 22
7.1 Planned Capital Funding 2014 – 2033 ........................................................................ 23
7.1.1 Planned Capital Purchases 2018 – 2023 ..................................................... 23
7.2 Progress toward Planned Capital Purchases .............................................................. 25
8 2018 – 2023 Capital Plan Effects on Impact Fees ............................................................... 25
9 Capital Cost Summaries ......................................................................................................... 26
9.1 Equipment Inventory, Life Cycle and Cost ................................................................. 26
9.2 Asset Preservation Costs ............................................................................................ 26
9.3 IT Capital Costs ........................................................................................................... 27
9.4 Fixed Facility Construction Projects ........................................................................... 27
9.5 Apparatus Funding Schedule ...................................................................................... 28
10 Inventories ............................................................................................................................. 29
10.1 Apparatus Inventory & Funding Schedule.................................................................. 29
EXHIBIT A 8.a
Packet Pg. 41
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
6 | P a g e
Table 1 2018 Fire Impact Fees.................................................................................................................................... 8
Table 2 Six-Year Funding Plan .................................................................................................................................... 8
Table 3 Population and Housing Growth Projections without SeaTac ................................................... 10
Table 4 Commercial Growth Rates 2013 & 2016 with estimates for 2021 & 2035 .......................... 11
Table 5 Incident Growth Projections .................................................................................................................... 11
Table 6 Fire Station & Support Facility Inventory ........................................................................................... 14
Table 7 Benchmark & Baseline Level of Service Objectives – Non-Medical Related ......................... 20
Table 8 Benchmark & Baseline Level of Service Objectives – EMS Related .......................................... 20
Table 9 Response Unit Reliability Objectives .................................................................................................... 21
Table 10 Hourly Unit Reliability for the Year 2016 ........................................................................................ 22
Table 11 Six Year (2016-2021) Capital Costing................................................................................................ 24
Table 12 2015 Impact Fees ....................................................................................................................................... 25
EXHIBIT A 8.a
Packet Pg. 42
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
7 | P a g e
1 Executive Summary
This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is an update and extension of the Puget Sound
Regional Fire Authority (PSF) 2014 – 2033 Master Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan (CFEP)
in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act (GMA) Chapter
36.70A RCW, City of Kent Code 12.15.060, and Covington City Code Chapter 19.50 “Fire Impact
Fees”.
This Plan update uses data available through the first quarter of 2017 to evaluate level of service
performance, and the progress toward implementation of the 2014 - 2033 CFEP. The goal of this
Plan is to identify the next six years of community growth, determine the need for additional
facilities and their cost and prioritize those resource into a 6-year funding plan (2018 – 2023) to
ensure adequate service delivery prior to, or concurrently with the impacts of development
within the service area.
The underlying premise of this document is that as the community continues to grow, additional
resources will be required to adequately serve the growing demand for fire & life safety services.
It is assumed that a direct relationship exists between populations within a community and
demand for service, which, directly links to a need to maintain and expand resources.
Since adoption and publication of the Master CFEP in 2014, the post-recession economy
continues its recovery with community growth and cost of construction returned to or exceeding
pre-recession rates. The City of Kent published a 2015 updated Comprehensive Plan that
continues a similar land use and community growth pattern. The City of Covington also
completed a Comprehensive Plan update in 2015 and has increased projected growth targets to
more closely reflect past market rates but, the combined rate of growth for Covington, Kent, and
unincorporated areas of PSF’s response area remain consistent with the projections of the 2014
CFEP. As a result, baseline impact fees in Table 2, have increased based upon the updated costs
associated with funding the capital resources required to maintain fire service concurrency.
A new property type, “Regional Commercial” has been added to the impact fee schedule. Regional
commercial is defined as a commercial use intended to serve a regional largely non-resident
population. These property types are likely to occur near regional transportation, shopping and
entertainment centers and produce much higher fire service impacts than similar properties
serving local resident populations. Because of the service demand of these properties, the impact
fee formula places a higher cost share on the developer (80% to 98%) to help offset the higher
impact of these properties.
Increasing service demand of assisted care facilities continues to rise as operators of these
facilities rely more and more on PSF staff for support. As a result, the de veloper cost share of
impact and level of service fees has been increased from 80% to 95%.
Compliance with the GMA requires a six-year funding plan, the funding plan in Table 2 has been
balanced through 2023 with a $235,000 surplus using increased projected revenue from both
EXHIBIT A 8.a
Packet Pg. 43
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
8 | P a g e
taxes and impact fees to cover the $4.16 million in increased costs over the 6-year projection.
However, the timing of some resources funded in this plan have been pushed back in time from
the Master 2014 CFEP because of these increasing costs and limits on available capital funding.
Table 1 2018 Fire Impact Fees
Land Use Type System wide
C&E
Res/Com
Split
New Dev
Share
Impact & LOS
Contribution Fee
Single Family $95,468,923 65%80%$1,860.61
Multi Family $95,468,923 65%80%$1,772.41
COMM/IND $95,468,923 35%80%$1.88
HOSP/MED/CIV/SCH/CHUR $95,468,923 35%80%$1.28
ASSISTED CARE $95,468,923 35%95%$2.89
COMM/IND $95,468,923 35%98%$2.31
HOSP/MED/CIV/SCH/CHUR $95,468,923 35%98%$1.57
56%1.13 16,884 living units
LOS Formula Calculation
Usage Factor ERF Factor Projected New
Units 2014 - 2035
Residential
44%1.37 16,884 living units
Commercial
32%2.75 12,500,000 sq ft
30%2 12,500,000 sq ft
38%3 12,500,000 sq ft
Regional Commercial
32%2.75 12,500,000 sq ft
30%2 12,500,000 sq ft
Table 2 Six-Year Funding Plan
Cost/Funding Source 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Totals
Station Construction & Land Purchase $40 $919 $923 $1,286 $4,540 $843 $8,552
Apparatus $1,283 $1,321 $1,872 $1,462 $1,017 $1,737 $8,692
Equipment $1,858 $642 $730 $470 $356 $378 $4,434
Asset Preservation $351 $363 $205 $195 $242 $100 $1,455
I.T. Capital $672 $86 $144 $146 $15 $15 $1,078
I.T Independence Capital $425 $40 $125 $218 $22 $2 $832
72nd Ave S Extension $120 $120 $120 $120 $120 $120 $720
Station debt expense $13 $13 $12 $11 $10 $9 $68
Annual Revenue to Capital $1,890 $1,947 $1,986 $2,050 $2,100 $2,130 $12,103
Taxpayer Bond Funds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Sale of Surplus Property/Equipment $253 $32 $98 $50 $284 $50 $767
Covington Impact/LOS Fees $600 $315 $515 $600 $750 $250 $3,030
Kent Impact Fees $850 $600 $850 $952 $960 $313 $4,525
Councilmatic Bonds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
King County Radio Program $0 $0 $767 $0 $0 $0 $767
Apparatus Shop Overhead Fees $8 $8 $8 $8 $9 $9 $50
Decrease in Kent ILA for IT $0 $25 $75 $130 $130 $130 $490
SCBA Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Apparatus Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Burn Prop Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
City of Kent - Land Swap-Partnership $0 $100 $100 $100 $200 $0 $500
SeaTac ILA Capital $1,168 $510 $522 $533 $544 $557 $3,834
Expense $4,761 $3,504 $4,131 $3,908 $6,322 $3,204 $25,830
Revenue $4,769 $3,537 $4,921 $4,423 $4,977 $3,438 $26,065
Balance $8 $40 $831 $1,346 $1 $235 $235
6 - Year Cost/Funding Sources for Capital Needs
Costs in thousands based on 2017 dollars
Summary of revenue less expenses
Expense Sources
Revenue Sources
EXHIBIT A 8.a
Packet Pg. 44
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
9 | P a g e
2 Background and Demographics
PSF is an independent special purpose district legally formed under Chapter 52 of the Revised
Code of Washington providing fire and rescue services to more than 60 square miles of urban,
suburban and rural area. Services provided are delivered 24 hours per day, 365 days per year
through career firefighters and support staff. Services delivered by the PSF include; fire
suppression, fire prevention and code enforcement, fire investigations, emergency medical
services (EMS), non-emergent medical services, hazardous materials response, specialized
rescue services, emergency management services, and public education in fire prevention and
life safety.
The current service area includes all of the cities of Covington, Kent, and SeaTac, as well as
unincorporated areas of King County within King County Fire District 37. Generally, PSF’s service
area borders Renton and Tukwila to the north, Maple Valley to the east, Auburn to the south and
Burien, Des Moines and Federal Way to the west. Current 2017 population of PSF service area is
182,145.1
For purposes of this plan, capital improvements are defined as real estate, structures or collective
equipment purchases anticipated to have a cost of $5,000 or more and an expected useful life of
at least 3 years.
This update re-establishes the service level standards adopted by the PSF in its 2014 Standard of
Cover (SOC) and evaluates existing and future service capacity. Fire service capacity is evaluated
upon the ability of current deployed resources to meet established levels of service. Fire stations
and their apparatus are evaluated to determine capacity. A fire station with three apparatus bays
and the infrastructure required to support three or more emergency response units, has reserve
capacity when only one unit and crew is deployed from that station. Also, a fire resource that
meets its level of service objectives and is reliably available for service at least as often as it is
expected to meet its level of service objective, has reserve capacity. The PSF’s goal is to deliver
service at the adopted level of service (LOS) 9 times out of 10 or a service expectation that meets
adopted standards 90% of the time.
Fire service capacity is also measured with consideration of future growth and the fire service
capacity that future growth will erode when built. This Plan identifies:
• The current demographics of the PSF
• The inventory of existing capital resources
• The capital needs that have been implemented since adoption of the CFEP in 2014
• The recent historical performance to the adopted standards
• The need for additional resources over the next six years
• The funding plan to implement the needed resources through 2023.
1 Washington State Office of Financial Management April 2017 with estimates of fire district 37’s
unincorporated area based upon housing counts and 3 persons per dwelling
EXHIBIT A 8.a
Packet Pg. 45
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
10 | P a g e
2.1 SeaTac Service Area
PSF provides fire based services to the City of SeaTac through a contract for service that began
January 1, 2014. SeaTac’s area covers approximately 10 square miles surrounding the Port of
Seattle Airport and has a 2017 population of 28,850.
Three fire stations (two in 2018) owned by SeaTac are leased and operated by the PSF under the
service contract. All other capital resources previously owned by SeaTac prior to 2014 have been
transferred to the ownership of the PSF. As a condition of the service contract, SeaTac provides
an annual capital payment to the PSF for funding the equipment that was transferred but has
retained responsibility for the capital costs of fire stations. Consequently, this plan does not
address capital fire station needs in the SeaTac service area.
3 Community Growth and Impacts of Growth 2018 – 2023
In the post-Great Recession years from 2010 to 2016, PSF’s population grew at its slowest 6-year
rate in more than 30 years. Growth from new development during 2010 through 2015 averaged
less than ¾ of 1 percent per year. Now in 2017, the Office of Financial Management reports the
greatest year over year population growth since 2007 in Washington State resulting in a 2.62%
population increase within the PSF service area.
While growth seemed to be limited during the post-Great Recession years, the rate of emergency
service demand over the same 6-year period grew from 15,626 service requests in 2010 to
19,765 (not including the City of SeaTac) in 2015. This is an annual incident growth rate of 3.5%.
Incident growth with SeaTac; 2014 through 2016 was more than 15%. The total 7-year increase
in service demand from formation of the RFA in 2010 through August 2017 is more than 72%
with overall population growth of just 24%.
Table 3 Population and Housing Growth Projections without SeaTac2
Service Area
Housing
Units Population Housing
Units Population Housing
Units Population Housing
Units Population Housing
Units Population
Covington 4,203 13,783 6,368 18,480 6,964 19,850 8,074 21,679 10,294 29,342
Kent 32,488 79,524 46,417 121,400 47,294 127,100 50,551 135,853 57,275 153,923
King Co 9,950 27,362 2,015 5,542 2,203 6,345 2,406 6,414 2,711 7,226
Sub-Total 46,641 120,669 54,800 145,422 56,461 153,295 61,031 163,946 70,280 190,491
SeaTac 10,176 25,496 10,404 27,110 10,505 28,850 10,884 28,298 11,808 30,112
Total 56,817 146,165 65,204 172,532 66,966 182,145 71,915 192,244 82,088 220,603
2000 Actuals 2014 Actuals 2023 Estimates 2035 Estimates2017 Actuals
The Puget Sound Regional Council’s regional plan “Vision 2040,” identifies Kent as both a
residential and commercial/industrial growth center, making it likely that growth rates will
continue at approximately 3% per year for the next 20 years.
The table below provides both a low and high range estimate of commercial growth. Continued
growth at the 2013 to 2017 rate is the “Low” estimate for 2023 and 2035, and the “High” estimate
2 Figures for 2000 to 2016 are actual counts from the Office of Financial Management, 2021 and
2035 are based upon OFM and Comprehensive Plan estimates of Covington and Kent
EXHIBIT A 8.a
Packet Pg. 46
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
11 | P a g e
more closely relates to market growth prior to the Great Recession and better represents current
2017 growth rates. Both of these estimates are dependent upon buildable lands and future
market rates.
Table 4 Commercial Growth Rates 2013 & 2016 with estimates for 2021 & 2035
Year 2013 2016 2021 2035
Low / High Commercial
Growth in Square Feet 64,415,115 64,995,002 66,734,918 / 72,794,723 70,793,856 / 77,344,052
3.1 Impacts of Future Growth
Two methods of growth projections have been used in Table 4 to determine the impacts of
projected growth through 2035, the first utilizes the projected new units of the Covington and
Kent Comprehensive Plans and the second utilizes the incident growth rates from 2010 through
2015 of 3.5% per year. The average of these two methods has been used to predict the future
service demand as a result of growth. This method predicts service demand from the 2016 total
incident count (excluding the SeaTac area) of 19,226, to an estimated growth of 22% or 23,464
incidents in 2021 and a 64% incident growth rate to 31,532 by 2035.
3.1.1 Growth Remains Consistent with the 2014 – 2033 Master CFEP
The pattern of growth and estimates of future impacts on service demand are consistent with the
2014 Master plan and the resource needs projected in that plan.
Table 5 Incident Growth Projections
Type 2,015
2015
Total
Incidents
2015
Incident
Rate Per
Unit
2021 Low
Housing
Commercial
Unit Count
2021 High
Housing
Commercial
Unit Count
Average
Projected
Incident Count
2021
2035 Low
Housing
Commercial
Unit Count
2035 High
Housing
Commercial
Unit Count
Average
Projected
Incident
Count 2035
Housing Units 55,579 14,420 0.259 58,440 58,440 15,136 72,686 72,686 18,826
Commercial Space 64,995,002 4,807 0.074 66,734,918 72,794,724 5,159 70,793,856 90,993,003 5,982
Total Incidents 2015
Rates 19,227 20,295 24,808
Total Incidents -3.5%
Growth Factor 19,277 26,633 38,256
Average of Both
Methods 19,277 23,464 31,532
4 Current Capital Resources
Capital resources for PSF consist of fire stations, fire apparatus (vehicles used for fire and rescue
work), staff vehicles and the related equipment, tools and personal protection equipment needed
to safely and legally provide fire and rescue services.
4.1 Influence of Public Protection Class Rating (PPC)
In the early 1900s, major U.S. cities suffered disastrous fires that destroyed billions of dollars'
worth of property. In the aftermath, insurance companies realized that they needed advance
information on the fire-loss characteristics of individual communities.
EXHIBIT A 8.a
Packet Pg. 47
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
12 | P a g e
Since 1909, the Municipal Inspection and Grading System and its successors have been an
important part of the underwriting and rating process for insurers writing personal and
commercial fire policies. Washington State’s Survey and Rating Bureau (WSRB) service is a direct
descendent of the earlier grading systems and is derived from the Insurance Services Office (ISO)
rating system. The PPC program gives insurers credible data to help them develop premiums
that fairly reflect the risk of loss in a particular location.
In each Washington community, WSRB analyzes relevant data and then assigns a Public
Protection Classification from 1 to 10. Class 1 represents exemplary public protection, and Class
10 indicates an area without fire protection. Insurance companies use PPC information to help
establish fair premiums for fire insurance, generally offering lower premiums in communities
with better protection. It is estimated that property owners in the PSF service area, save more
than $30 million each year in reduced premiums compared to not meeting the ISO/WSRB’s
minimum criteria.
A community's PPC rating depends on:
• Emergency Communications Systems:
A review of the fire alarm/911 system accounts for 9% of the total classification. The
review focuses on the community's facilities and support for handling and dispatching
fire alarms.
• Fire operations & deployment:
A review of the fire department accounts for 40% of the total classification. The focus is
on a fire agencies first-alarm response and initial attack to minimize potential loss.
Here, WSRB reviews the adequacies of such items as engine companies, ladder or
service companies, distribution of fire stations and fire companies, equipment carried
on apparatus, pumping capacity, reserve apparatus, department personnel, and
training.
• Fire Safety Control:
A review of the community having jurisdiction’s (Covington, Kent, King County SeaTac)
ability to adopt and enforce effective building codes makes up 16% of the total PPC
scoring. This is based upon the jurisdictions practices to adopt codes, train and staff
personnel to enforce these codes and public awareness programs to their adopted
building codes. Further evaluation looks at the process in place to review plans of new
buildings to ensure structures are code compliant and ongoing inspections of existing
buildings for code compliance.
• Jurisdictional water supply:
The jurisdictions water-supply system accounts for 35% of the total classification.
WSRB reviews the water supply a community uses to determine the adequacy for fire-
suppression purposes. They also consider hydrant size, type, and installation, as well as
the inspection frequency and condition of fire hydrants.
4.1.1 Limitations of Deployed Resources to Preserve PPC
Because one of the PPC rating criteria is the deployment of resource for fire protection, PSF must
maintain the fire protection equipment staffing and deployment that supports its current PPC
rating. PSF recognizes the cost savings that could be realized by deploying lighter, cheaper, more
maneuverable response vehicles to respond to EMS emergencies but must first maintain the fire
EXHIBIT A 8.a
Packet Pg. 48
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
13 | P a g e
equipment that supports the PPC rating which provides more than $30 million annually in
decreased insurance costs to the service area. To deploy both types of vehicles, additional staffing
is required and currently, PSF does not have the funding to accomplish this type of deployment
and will continue to maintain its firefighting resources first, to preserve or improve PPC ratings.
4.2 Fixed Facilities
4.2.1 Fire Stations
Emergency services originate from eight fire stations located throughout the service area (not
including SeaTac) as identified in the Table and map shown below. The average fire station is 28
years old with ages ranging from 9 to 53 years old with the capacity for three emergency response
apparatus and is 14,675 square feet in size. Individual stations range in size from just under 8,000
to more than 26,000 square feet where training facilities are included. Currently only stations 71,
and 74, maintain more than one front line response apparatus with minimum staffing levels.
Seven of eight stations have some reserve capacity in the form of apparatus bays and dorm rooms.
However, to utilize this capacity, additional climate controlled space is required to house reserve
apparatus, alternative response vehicles, and equipment that is currently stored in existing
apparatus bays now.
4.2.2 Support Facilities
Support facilities include space and equipment for emergency management functions, fire-
training, apparatus & vehicle maintenance, facilities maintenance, planning, information
technology, CARES, logistics, and a roadway. An inventory of these facilities is found in Table 4
below.
4.2.3 Roadways - 72nd Ave South
An unfinished segment of 72nd Ave S in the Kent valley was completed on June 28, 2017 and is a
support facility to the PSF because previous analysis determined funding and building the
roadway was more cost effective than building and staffing a fire station. This new route, avoids
chronic response delays caused by traffic congestion associated with S 212th Street and SR 167
traffic at the East Valley Highway. PSF’s part in completing this section of roadway is funding
$1.2 million of the project’s cost through a partnership with the City of Kent. PSF’s total cost is
less than a single year’s cost of wages and benefits for personnel to staff a new fire station.
EXHIBIT A 8.a
Packet Pg. 49
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
14 | P a g e
Table 6: Fire Station & Support Facility Inventory
Fire
Station/Facility Location Size Built
Yrs in
Srvc Acquired Capacity Cond Acres
Dorm
Beds
Station 71 504 West Crow Street 10,858 1964 53 2010 3.5 bays Fair 1.05 10
Station 72 25620 140th Ave SE 7,772 1982 35 2010 3 bays Fair 0.91 6
Station 73 26512 Military Road South 13,000 1990 27 2010 3 bays Good 4.69 9
Station 74 24611 116th Ave SE 26,653 1990 27 Lease 2010 3 Bays Good 8.66 17
Station 75 15635 SE 272nd Street 12,425 1990 27 Lease 2010 3 bays Good 4.18 14
Station 76 20676 72nd Ave S 13,104 1989 28 2010 3 bays Good 2.80 9
Station 77 20717 132nd Ave SE 15,900 2001 16 2010 3 bays Good 1.98 8
Station 78 17820 SE 256th Street 17,685 2009 8 2010 4 bays Good 3.10 10
Totals 117,397 221 27.37 83
Benson Station 21599 108th Ave SE 0 0 2010 0 Land 0.29
Valley Station 407 Washington Ave S 0 0 2008 0 Land 1.23
Totals 0.29
EM 24425 116th Ave SE 2,860 1963 54 2010 Good 0.23
Training Tower 24523 116th Ave SE 4,652 1990 27 Lease 2010 Good N/A
Training Annex 24524 116th Ave SE 1,152 2005 12 2005 Poor N/A
Apparatus Shop 20678 72nd Ave S 10,865 1989 28 2010 4 Bays Good N/A
Logistics Center 8320 S 208th Street 20,000 1979 6 2013 Good N/A
Sub-Total Totals 39,529 127 0.23
Total 156,926 27.89 83
Future Fire Station Sites Owned by KFDRFA
Accesory Structures Owned, Maintained or Funded by KFDRFA
Exhibit 1: PSF Service Area Map
EXHIBIT A 8.a
Packet Pg. 50
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
15 | P a g e
4.3 Mobile Resources
Specific inventories of mobile resources are found in the Appendices of this Plan.
4.3.1 Apparatus Life Cycle Policy
Agencies with workload similar to the PSF utilize a life cycle for heavy apparatus of 10
years front line and 5 or 10 years in reserve status for a total in-service life of 15 or 20
years. Recent studies have shown that the maintenance cost and decreased residual value
of 20 year old fire engines is less cost effective than shorter life cycles of 15 years. Because
of this, PSF’s long-term policy will be to continue with a 10 year front line life cycle but
shorten the reserve life cycle from 10 to 5 years. This shorter time in service, allows for
significantly higher surplus values when apparatus are sold following their time in
service. Studies show this also reduces overall maintenance costs, downtime, and
provides greater savings than longer life cycles.
4.3.2 Fire Engines
PSF fire engines are specialized apparatus equipped with pumps capable of up to 2,000
gallons per minute or more of fire flow when connected to a hydrant. They carry onboard
water supplies of 500 gallons or more and a compliment of hoses, nozzles and firefighting
equipment necessary to the extinguishment of fires. The current inventory of 8 front line
fire engines has an average age of 12 years and average miles of 84,340. The six reserve
engines have an average age of 20 years with average miles of 141,709. According to the
National Fire Protection Association’s 2016 US fire needs assessment, only 43% of the
nation’s fire engines are 15 years of age or older.
4.3.3 Quints
A Quint is a multi-purpose apparatus or cross between a fire engine and a ladder truck.
They are capable of pumping fire flows like a fire engine and are equipped with shorter
ladders of 50 to 70 feet in length compared to the typical ladder trucks reach of 100 feet
or greater. Ladder trucks do not carry or pump water. PSF has two Quint units with 65
foot ladders, one located at Station 76 in the industrial north end of the Kent Valley, and
one at Station 75 near Covington. These two units are capable of delivering elevated
master streams of water like a ladder truck and cost effectively augment PSF’s ladder
trucks located at Stations 46 and 74.
4.3.4 Ladder Trucks
Both front line ladder trucks are tillered, meaning they are built on a tractor-trailer
platform. The trailer portion has steerable rear wheels that allow these units to
maneuver into very tight locations with their more than 100 foot ladders. One is located
at Station 74 and the other at Station 46. Apparatus 713, (Ladder 74) is 10 years old with
over 68,000 miles, and 800 ladder hours. Apparatus 768 (Ladder 46) is two years old
with 18,000 miles, making the average age of the two front line ladders 6 years old with
average mileage of 43,000. Reserve apparatus 715 is 20 years old with over 93,000 miles
and 1,214 ladder hours.
EXHIBIT A 8.a
Packet Pg. 51
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
16 | P a g e
4.3.5 Aid Cars
Aid Cars are licensed ambulances with extra equipment necessary to support the ir two-
person staffing with basic firefighting tools and protective equipment.. These vehicles
primarily respond to medical emergencies and augment fire staffing required to maintain
the PSF’s Public Protection Class ratings.
4.3.6 Command and Staff Vehicles
Command and staff vehicles are utilized to support both emergency and non-emergency
operations of PSF. Command and staff vehicles are specially outfitted with equipment and
communications equipment necessary to support the mission they are assigned to.
4.4 Equipment
A full complement of special equipment is necessary for the delivery of fire and rescue services.
Special equipment includes all of the equipment within fire stations or carried on fire engines
and other apparatus that allow firefighters to safely and effectively deliver services. Table 9.1
provides a listing of the equipment maintained by PSF.
5 Standards of Service
5.1 Time and Origin of Standards
Time to arrival at the scene of an emergency is critical in the survival of a non -breathing patient
and the control of fire growth. The longer it takes trained fire personnel to arrive at the scene of
an emergency, the greater the chance of poor outcomes regarding fire and life loss3. As a result,
the standards identified herein adopted by PSF and are based upon industry best practices.
Industry standards have been established by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and
the Center for Public Safety Excellence (CPSE). PSF’s level of service standards exceed the
expectations established by these groups largely because of limited funding to deliver service.
Compared to the NFPA, PSF’s level of service standards exceeds those of the NFPA in some cases
by 1 minute and 40 seconds.
5.2 Emergency response
Achievement of drive time standards are influenced by the location of fire service resources. If a
service area is located too far from a fire station (poor distribution), it is unlikely that travel time
objectives will be met. If distributed resources are over-used because of high demand, their
capacity becomes “unreliable” to meet additional demand at adopted levels of service. Because
of units becoming unreliable, units from farther away must respond in place of the busy home
area unit, causing increases in arrival times. If too few resources exist, and fire resources from
other fire departments are needed to backfill for busy units, the consequence is extended drive
times, resulting in increased total response times and higher levels of risk for life and property
loss.
3 See section 5 and of the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Mitigation and Level of Service Policy for additional detail and
consequences of long response times.
EXHIBIT A 8.a
Packet Pg. 52
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
17 | P a g e
5.3 Benchmark / Baseline Gap Performance and Relation to Staffing
PSF uses adopted Benchmark performance levels as those levels of service to be achieved as
capital facilities and resources are funded, deployed, and staffed. Baseline levels of service
represent the actual performance achieved over the previous 5-years. PSF’s goal of capital
planning is to close the gap between baseline and benchmark performance. The CPSE annually
reviews PSF’s baseline performance to assure progress toward achieving benchmark
expectations. Failure to progressively improve toward benchmark expectations can lead to loss
of accredited agency status.
The gap between the two performance standards (benchmark and baseline) should close as
funding becomes available to implement the capital needs identified in the 2014 – 2033 PSF
Master Capital Plan and this 2018 – 2023 six-year update of that Plan. Operational funding of
additional staff is also required to close the resource gap. Where additional response stations
and apparatus are required, PSF must also fund the annual operational cost of additional
firefighters and support staff.
5.4 Components of Response Performance
There are three measured components of “Total Response Time” and one currently unmeasured
component as described below:
5.4.1 Alarm Handling Time
Alarm handling is completed at Valley Communications Center, the public safety
answering point (PSAP) agency available to PSF. Alarm handling is the total time elapsed
from the pick-up of a 911 call until enough information is collected to dispatch
appropriate resources.
5.4.2 Turnout Time
Turnout refers to the total time it takes firefighters to discontinue their current task,
assess dispatch information, don appropriate personal protective gear, and become
safely seat-belted in the response apparatus and ready to begin their response. Turnout
time ends and drive time begins when the response vehicle begins to move.
5.4.3 Drive Time
Drive time begins when the response vehicle’s wheels begin to roll and ends once the
response vehicle arrives at the curbside address of the dispatched incident. When added
together, alarm handling plus turnout plus drive time equals total response time.
5.4.4 At Patient Side or Water on Fire
Currently, the time it takes to move from curbside address to the location of the patient
requiring assistance, or the time it takes to setup for firefighting operations until first
water is applied to a fire is not tracked. Technology to track this critical time is just now
becoming available.
EXHIBIT A 8.a
Packet Pg. 53
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
18 | P a g e
5.5 Deployment and Measures of Response Resources
The performance measure directly in PSF’s control is the “Dispatch to Arrival Interval” and
consists of turnout + drive time. This measure assesses response time performance against two
deployment practices, distribution and concentration.
5.5.1 Distribution
Distribution refers to how fire stations and resources are distributed around a service
area to achieve defined levels of service goals for first units to arrive. Distribution can be
referred to as the “speed of attack” or the first unit to arrive. Achievements of first unit
arrival time objectives indicate that fire stations are properly distributed throughout the
service area.
5.5.1.1 Distribution / First unit to arrive - Service Capabilities:
The first unit arriving at the scene of an emergency staffed with a minimum of 2
firefighters on an Aid Car, or 3 firefighters on an Engine, shall be capable of; establishing
command; calling for additional resources; extending appropriate hose line(s); and/or
beginning delivery of basic life support and/or rescue services. These operations are
done in accordance with Department standard operating procedures while providing for
the safety of the general public and responders.
5.5.2 Concentration
Concentration refers to the number of resources that can be assembled or “concentrated”
at the scene of an emergency. Concentration can be referred to as the “force of attack” or
full first alarm assignment. Concentration resources need to provide the quantity of
resources necessary to stop the escalation of an emergency. If an agency cannot
distribute and concentrate adequate resources, fire and life loss will be higher when
compared to the timely arrival of adequate resources.
5.5.2.1 Concentration / Minimum Effective Response Force
The minimum effective response force (MERF) consists of the arrival of at least 3
apparatus with a minimum of 8 firefighters. The MERF is capable of: establishing
command; providing an uninterrupted water supply; advancing an attack line and a
backup line for fire control; complying with the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) requirements of two-in and two-out; completing forcible entry;
and searching and rescuing at-risk victims. These operations shall be done in accordance
with the Department’s standard operating procedures while providing for the safety of
responders and the general public.
5.5.2.2 Concentration / Full first alarm – Service Capabilities:
The full first alarm resources arriving at the scene of an emergency staffed with between
5 to 28 firefighters depending upon the incident type. These resources shall be capable
of; establishing command, providing an uninterrupted water supply, deploying hose lines
for fire control and suppression, complying with the two in-two out law for firefighter
rescue, completing forcible entry, ventilating smoke, controlling utilities, and/or rescuing
and treating sick, injured, or at-risk victims. These operations are done in accordance
EXHIBIT A 8.a
Packet Pg. 54
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
19 | P a g e
with departmental standard operating procedures while providing for the safety of the
general public and responders.
5.6 Benchmark and Baseline Level of Service Objectives:
Table 7 establishes the service level objectives for; Alarm Handling, Firefighter Turnout, and
drive times expectations of distribution (first unit) and concentration (MERF and ERF)
performance. Benchmark levels of service are targeted for achievement as additional resources
identified in this Plan and the Master CFEP are funded, implemented and staffed. Baseline
performance objectives are the minimum levels of service PSF is currently capable of achieving
and must be maintained or improved to retain status as an “Accredited Agency” through the
Center for Public Safety Excellence.
5.6.1 Community Risk Types
Performance expectations have been established for three community risk types, urban,
suburban, and rural,4 with both benchmark and baseline objectives as shown in Table 5.
5.6.2 Performance Measured
Washington State’s Chapter 52.33 RCW requires performance measures meaningful to flashover
and brain death to be established, performed, and reported at the 90th percentile. If response
times of 100 incidents were stacked from quickest to slowest, the time of the 90th incident is the
time used to measure service delivery at 90%.
5.6.3 Performance Expectations
The following two tables outline the standards adopted by the PSF for the two main categories of
emergency incidents; those requiring donning of full firefighting “personal protective
equipment” (PPE) shown in Table 7 below, and those emergency medical incidents that do not
require full firefighting gear shown in Table 8 below. Donning firefighting gear is time
consuming, and consequently longer turnout times are applied to Table 7.
4 See section 4.2.1.7 of the 2014-2033 PSF Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan.
EXHIBIT A 8.a
Packet Pg. 55
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
20 | P a g e
Table 7: Benchmark & Baseline Level of Service Objectives – Non-Medical Related
1st Unit 2nd Unit 3rd Unit MERF Balance of 1st Alarm Performance
Benchmark Call Processing 1 min 10 sec 1 min 10 sec 1 min 10 sec 1 min 10 sec 90%
Base Call Processing 1 min 25 sec 1 min 25 sec 1 min 25 sec 1 min 25 sec 90%
Overall Benchmark Turnout 1 min 55 sec 1 min 55 sec 1 min 55 sec 1 min 55 sec 90%
Base Turnout 2 min 30 sec 2 min 30 sec 2 min 30 sec 2 min 30 sec 90%
Benchmark drive time 4 min 15 sec 5 min 55 sec 6 min 30 sec 8 min 55 sec 90%
Base Drive Time 6 min 08 sec 6 min 54 sec 7 min 44 sec 16 min 21 sec 90%
Total Benchmark Reflex 7 min 20 sec 9 min 00 sec 9 min 35 sec 12 min 00 sec 90%
Total Baseline Reflex 9 min 03 sec 9 min 49 sec 11 min 39 sec 20 min 16 sec 90%
1st Unit 2nd Unit 3rd Unit MERF Balance of 1st Alarm Performance
Benchmark Call Processing 1 min 10 sec 1 min 10 sec 1 min 10 sec 1 min 10 sec 90%
Base Call Processing 1 min 25 sec 1 min 25 sec 1 min 25 sec 1 min 25 sec 90%
Benchmark Turnout 1 min 55 sec 1 min 55 sec 1 min 55 sec 1 min 55 sec 90%
Base Turnout 2 min 30 sec 2 min 30 sec 2 min 30 sec 2 min 30 sec 90%
Benchmark Drive Time 4 min 35 sec 6 min 10 sec 6 min 45 sec 8 min 55 sec 90%
Base Drive Time 4 min 40 sec 5 min 32 sec 7 min 00 sec 10 min 22 sec 90%
Total Benchmark Reflex 7 min 40 sec 9 min 15 sec 9 min 50 sec 12 min 00 sec 90%
Total Baseline Reflex 8 min 35 sec 9 min 27 sec 10 min 55 sec 14 min 17 sec 90%
1st Unit 2nd Unit 3rd Unit MERF Balance of 1st Alarm Performance
Benchmark Call Processing 1 min 10 sec 1 min 10 sec 1 min 10 sec 1 min 10 sec 90%
Base Call Processing 1 min 25 sec 1 min 25 sec 1 min 25 sec 1 min 25 sec 90%
Benchmark Turnout 1 min 55 sec 1 min 55 sec 1 min 55 sec 1 min 55 sec 90%
Base Turnout 2 min 30 sec 2 min 30 sec 2 min 30 sec 2 min 30 sec 90%
Benchmark Drive Time 5 min 30 sec 6 min 10 sec 7 min 00 sec 9 min 55 sec 90%
Base Drive Time 5 min 04 sec No Data No Data No Data 90%
Total Benchmark Reflex 8 min 35 sec 9 min 15 sec 10 min 05 sec 13 min 00 sec 90%
Total Baseline Reflex 8 min 59 sec No Data No Data No Data 90%
Urban-an incorporated or un-incorporated area with a population of over 30,000 people and/or a population
density of 2,000 people per square mile
Suburban-an incorporated or un-incorporated area with a population of 10,000-29,999 and/or any area with a
Rural –an incorporated or un-incorporated area with a population less than 10,000 people, or with a population
Response Standards - PPE Required
Includes all priority 100, 200, 400, 600, and 700 Incident types
Table 8 Benchmark & Baseline Level of Service Objectives – Emergency Medical Service (EMS) Related
1st Unit Balance of 1st Alarm Performance
Benchmark Call Processing 1 min 10 sec 1 min 10 sec 90%
Base Call Processing 1 min 25 sec 1 min 25 sec 90%
Overall Benchmark Turnout 1 min 45 sec 1 min 45 sec 90%
Base Turnout 2 min 00 sec 2 min 00 sec 90%
Benchmark drive time 4 min 15 sec 4 min 35 sec 90%
Base Drive Time 5 min 02 sec 3 min 56 sec 90%
Total Benchmark Reflex 7 min 10 sec 7 min 30 sec 90%
Total Baseline Reflex 8 min 27 sec 7 min 21 sec 90%
1st Unit Balance of 1st Alarm Performance
Benchmark Call Processing 1 min 10 sec 1 min 10 sec 90%
Base Call Processing 1 min 25 sec 1 min 25 sec 90%
Benchmark Turnout 1 min 45 sec 1 min 45 sec 90%
Base Turnout 2 min 00 sec 2 min 00 sec 90%
Benchmark Drive Time 4 min 35 sec 4 min 55 sec 90%
Base Drive Time 4 min 50 sec 4 min 14 sec 90%
Total Benchmark Reflex 7 min 30 sec 7 min 50 sec 90%
Total Baseline Reflex 8 min 15 sec 7 min 39 sec 90%
1st Unit Balance of 1st Alarm Performance
Benchmark Call Processing 1 min 10 sec 1 min 10 sec 90%
Base Call Processing 1 min 25 sec 1 min 25 sec 90%
Benchmark Turnout 1 min 45 sec 1 min 45 sec 90%
Base Turnout 2 min 00 sec 2 min 00 sec 90%
Benchmark Drive Time 5 min 30 sec 5 min 55 sec 90%
Base Drive Time 6 min 38 sec 4 min 23 sec 90%
Total Benchmark Reflex 8 min 30 sec 8 min 50 sec 90%
Total Baseline Reflex 10 min 03 sec 7 min 48 sec 90%
Response Standards - No PPE Required
Urban-an incorporated or un-incorporated area with a population of over 30,000
Suburban-an incorporated or un-incorporated area with a population of 10,000-
Rural –an incorporated or un-incorporated area with a population less than 10,000
EXHIBIT A 8.a
Packet Pg. 56
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
21 | P a g e
5.6.4 Resource Capacity
Finally, resource capacity is evaluated. The fire service refers to this measure as “reliability” and
is measured through “unit hour utilization” and the reserve availability of specific response units.
If an emergency response unit was in its assigned location 24 hours a day and never called upon
for service, it would have a unit hour utilization of 0.00% and reliability of 100%. But, if an
emergency response unit is expected to provide a level of service performance at 90% or 9 times
out of every ten requests, that unit must be available or “reliable” for providing service when
called upon at least 90% of the time or it will likely fail in its performance expectation. Unit
reliability is the best predictor of service capacity of deployed units. As workload or unit hour
utilization increases, reliability decreases.
Table 9: Response Unit Reliability Objectives
6 PSF Service Level Performance
6.1 Response Performance Findings
Analysis of PSF’s historical response data reveals sub-standard performance compared to
benchmark expectations. See Tables 7 & 8 Baseline Drive Time compared to Benchmark Drive
Time. Several factors contribute to this current sub-standard performance. First, performance
cannot be met during peak hours where workload and unit hour utilization is high and unit
reliability is low. Second, some areas of PSF simply cannot be reached within the adopted time
standards because of excess distance from a fire station or increasing traffic congestion. Finally,
latencies in current communications and alerting systems extend firefighter turnout times
beyond benchmark standards.
6.1.1 Reliability Measure
Reliability is typically used as an indicator to monitor the need for additional resources.
Reliability at or above 95% is considered to be reliable with reserve capacity. This is shown in
Table 10 below as “Green.” As reliability falls below 95% (displayed as yellow) it is time to begin
planning for the deployment of additional resources to handle the increasing workload.
Reliability below 90% (displayed as red) often prevents reliable achievement of response
standards. Those units with reliability displayed in red have high unit hour utilization and are
considered in resource exhaustion and begin to impact surrounding fire station reliability by
drawing in surrounding resources to cover for high unit hour utilization or resource exhaustion
occurring during peak demand hours. This ripple effect of deficient reliability spreads outward
with the consequence of longer response times because units must travel out of their home area
to cover the deficient area. This ripple continues to spread during peak demand hours moving
out to other fire stations and often to other jurisdictions.
Minimum RELIABILITY Objectives
Performance Type Urban Suburban Rural
Minimum Peak Hour Unit Reliability 90% 90% 90%
EXHIBIT A 8.a
Packet Pg. 57
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
22 | P a g e
6.1.2 Reliability & Mutual Aid
The measure to which reliability impacts other jurisdictions is seen in automatic mutual aid
balances. Currently PSF maintains a deficit in mutual aid with all but one of its surrounding
neighbors because of the need to use more outside resources than can be repaid through services
given back to these mutual aid neighbors.
Table 10 Hourly Unit Reliability for the Year 20165
St 45 St 46 St 47 St 72 St 73 St 75 St 76 St 77 St 78
Hour E-45 L-46 E-47 A-70 A-71 E-71 E-72 E-73 A-74 E-74 L-74 Q-75 Q-76 E-77 E-78
0:00 92.33% 93.65% 97.82% 99.53% 89.19% 95.73% 95.63% 91.65% 97.80% 87.87% 98.64% 96.76% 95.29% 94.21% 96.91%
1:00 92.89% 93.47% 98.51% 99.81% 87.85% 94.49% 96.77% 91.99% 97.57% 89.01% 98.82% 96.83% 95.41% 95.45% 96.66%
2:00 91.22% 94.41% 98.88% 99.65% 88.19% 95.47% 98.09% 93.93% 96.92% 90.36% 97.95% 95.81% 95.85% 95.23% 96.77%
3:00 91.25% 95.03% 99.16% 99.59% 89.30% 96.49% 97.04% 92.59% 98.39% 91.15% 99.01% 96.96% 95.04% 94.04% 98.25%
4:00 92.96% 94.29% 98.27% 99.25% 91.37% 96.72% 96.63% 94.28% 97.93% 90.78% 98.90% 96.48% 95.50% 94.82% 97.81%
5:00 93.07% 94.88% 98.40% 99.83% 92.63% 96.12% 97.07% 94.84% 98.07% 89.48% 98.66% 96.00% 95.22% 93.83% 96.94%
6:00 92.19% 94.96% 98.93% 99.15% 90.26% 96.16% 96.86% 94.51% 98.10% 88.02% 98.08% 95.62% 92.15% 94.34% 97.72%
7:00 89.77% 95.01% 98.90% 99.38% 86.81% 93.14% 96.05% 92.26% 97.55% 87.18% 96.94% 95.55% 92.25% 92.62% 97.17%
8:00 90.20% 94.88% 98.92% 100.00% 85.92% 91.53% 94.20% 93.71% 98.03% 85.47% 97.04% 93.36% 92.06% 90.94% 94.81%
9:00 89.62% 94.33% 97.77% 99.76% 86.32% 89.82% 95.72% 92.93% 96.91% 85.68% 96.30% 94.17% 91.62% 91.22% 94.79%
10:00 89.89% 95.30% 97.55% 99.80% 83.83% 89.95% 94.91% 91.84% 96.49% 83.86% 96.29% 93.13% 90.49% 91.96% 96.11%
11:00 90.81% 93.42% 97.77% 99.88% 83.90% 91.18% 95.53% 91.28% 96.94% 82.97% 94.86% 93.68% 92.15% 92.47% 95.14%
12:00 89.49% 94.09% 96.96% 99.90% 83.13% 91.02% 95.07% 90.49% 97.35% 80.72% 94.62% 92.07% 91.04% 88.33% 94.00%
13:00 90.15% 94.56% 96.55% 99.25% 83.63% 91.23% 94.87% 91.34% 96.16% 80.07% 93.64% 91.53% 90.77% 91.69% 94.87%
14:00 89.77% 93.84% 97.57% 99.54% 81.34% 89.95% 93.33% 91.04% 97.66% 84.06% 93.53% 92.01% 90.02% 90.57% 96.10%
15:00 89.26% 94.23% 97.14% 99.76% 82.51% 88.70% 93.81% 89.53% 97.71% 81.92% 93.46% 92.41% 92.99% 90.75% 95.02%
16:00 88.57% 92.38% 97.14% 99.86% 82.87% 89.62% 91.94% 89.87% 97.30% 80.73% 94.61% 91.08% 92.08% 90.12% 95.18%
17:00 87.64% 92.70% 97.14% 99.54% 82.79% 91.15% 92.89% 88.65% 97.40% 81.12% 94.55% 89.56% 91.83% 88.18% 95.78%
18:00 88.31% 92.34% 95.77% 99.92% 81.66% 89.85% 93.21% 90.78% 96.47% 80.90% 93.08% 91.78% 92.71% 90.13% 93.54%
19:00 88.76% 92.24% 96.28% 99.60% 83.69% 90.89% 94.30% 89.96% 95.38% 81.84% 94.03% 92.12% 91.59% 89.28% 95.42%
20:00 87.62% 92.70% 96.86% 99.06% 83.87% 92.76% 92.56% 90.45% 95.42% 82.07% 95.46% 90.72% 93.02% 91.83% 96.71%
21:00 88.81% 91.28% 95.61% 99.03% 84.03% 92.61% 93.20% 89.30% 95.13% 82.97% 95.50% 94.25% 94.16% 90.74% 95.69%
22:00 89.29% 92.39% 96.25% 99.10% 84.00% 92.66% 94.69% 89.60% 96.48% 85.42% 97.60% 94.34% 94.53% 91.25% 95.82%
23:00 92.29% 95.74% 97.59% 99.38% 88.95% 96.24% 96.46% 94.10% 97.89% 89.78% 97.53% 96.03% 95.72% 94.33% 97.92%
Total 90.26% 93.84% 97.57%95.03% 91.70%93.84% 93.06% 92.01% 96.05%
Station 71 St 74
2016 Reliability of Existing Stations & Resources with Minimum Staffing
92.65%92.83%
7 Conclusion of Need for Capital Resources 2018 – 2023
The most concerning evidence of the need for capital resources is the overall reliability of all
emergency response units displayed in Table 11 above. The only hour where PSF has unit
reliability above 95% occurs at 5:00 am. All other hours of the day are yellow and red. From
noon until 9:00 pm each day, resource exhaustion occurs with reliability below 90 percent. It is
expected that in the current year 2017, reliability will further erode increasing resource
exhaustion three additional hours each day with units unable to meet level of service
expectations from 10:00 am until 10:00 pm, all of the peak demand hours for emergency
response.
5 A reliability update will be provided in June of 2017 with the annual performance report.
EXHIBIT A 8.a
Packet Pg. 58
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
23 | P a g e
Nearly 1,000 new apartment units and 300 single family homes are currently permitted and
under construction in 2017. Growth within the PSF service area is expected to continue at or
close to the rates experienced prior to the Great Recession resulting in further declines in unit
reliability and erosion of service capacity. This in turn, will lead to steady increasing total
response times unless additional resources and the staffing they require can be funded and deployed.
7.1 Planned Capital Funding 2014 – 2033
The 2014 – 2033 PSF Capital Facilities and Equipment Master Plan identified the need for more
than $87 million in capital investments to maintain fire service concurrency through 2033. The
2016 6 year plan explored two options to reduce the near term cost of capital. First, less
expensive alternatives to some resources identified in the Master Plan have been chosen, next,
modified life cycles of fire apparatus are expected to provide additional value to surplussed
equipment that can assist in funding new capital. In total, this reduced the cost of some resources
needed in the next 6 years but escalating construction costs and inflation have increased the total
need for capital funding.
The additional cost associated with PSF’s portion of funding construction of 72nd Ave South, and
the cost of maintaining the apparatus and equipment transferred from SeaTac has been added
into the total capital costs established in the Master Plan. Combined with the cost saving
measures associated with the new apparatus life cycle plan the current cost of the total 2014
Master Plan has increased from $87.14 million to $95.47 million.
7.1.1 Planned Capital Purchases 2018 – 2023
The table below identifies the capital expenses to be incurred between 2018 and 2023 based
upon the current known priorities and levels of service. Each year this table will be updated to
reflect current known priorities and levels of service.
EXHIBIT A 8.a
Packet Pg. 59
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
24 | P a g e
Table 11: Six Year (2018-2023) Capital Costing
Cost/Funding Source 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Totals
Station Construction & Land Purchase $40 $919 $923 $1,286 $4,540 $843 $8,552
Apparatus $1,283 $1,321 $1,872 $1,462 $1,017 $1,737 $8,692
Equipment $1,858 $642 $730 $470 $356 $378 $4,434
Asset Preservation $351 $363 $205 $195 $242 $100 $1,455
I.T. Capital $672 $86 $144 $146 $15 $15 $1,078
I.T Independence Capital $425 $40 $125 $218 $22 $2 $832
72nd Ave S Extension $120 $120 $120 $120 $120 $120 $720
Station debt expense $13 $13 $12 $11 $10 $9 $68
Annual Revenue to Capital $1,890 $1,947 $1,986 $2,050 $2,100 $2,130 $12,103
Taxpayer Bond Funds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Sale of Surplus Property/Equipment $253 $32 $98 $50 $284 $50 $767
Covington Impact/LOS Fees $600 $315 $515 $600 $750 $250 $3,030
Kent Impact Fees $850 $600 $850 $952 $960 $313 $4,525
Councilmatic Bonds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
King County Radio Program $0 $0 $767 $0 $0 $0 $767
Apparatus Shop Overhead Fees $8 $8 $8 $8 $9 $9 $50
Decrease in Kent ILA for IT $0 $25 $75 $130 $130 $130 $490
SCBA Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Apparatus Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Burn Prop Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
City of Kent - Land Swap-Partnership $0 $100 $100 $100 $200 $0 $500
SeaTac ILA Capital $1,168 $510 $522 $533 $544 $557 $3,834
Expense $4,761 $3,504 $4,131 $3,908 $6,322 $3,204 $25,830
Revenue $4,769 $3,537 $4,921 $4,423 $4,977 $3,438 $26,065
Balance $8 $40 $831 $1,346 $1 $235 $235
6 - Year Cost/Funding Sources for Capital Needs
Costs in thousands based on 2017 dollars
Summary of revenue less expenses
Expense Sources
Revenue Sources
EXHIBIT A 8.a
Packet Pg. 60
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
25 | P a g e
7.2 Progress toward Planned Capital Purchases6
As a result of the Great Recession and the uncertainty of the economy during that time, PSF
delayed some planned equipment purchases between 2014 and 2016 and placed funding toward
the new Valley and Benson stations on hold. The Valley Station is now predicted to be completed
in 2023 and the Benson station scheduled for opening in 2028. All asset preservation projects,
equipment needs, and apparatus are now scheduled for funding and replacement through 2023.
The 2014 – 2033 Master Capital Plan is funded through 2033 with the following assumptions:
• Annual tax revenue to capital between 2023 – 2033 averages $2.46 million per year
• Impact fee revenue between 2033 – 2033 averages $1.9 million per year
8 2018 – 2023 Capital Plan Effects on Impact Fees
Impact fees are established in the PSF Mitigation and Level of Service Policy in Appendix A, using
a formula based upon the cost of capital needs and service demand by property type. The policy
requires updating along with the costs of annual capital plan updates. Total funding needs have
increased because of this update, resulting in an increase in impact fees displayed in Table 12 below.
Table 12: 2015 Impact Fees7
6 This plan will be supplemented with a capital summary including impact fee reports for both
Covington and Kent, August 2018
7 C&E costs adjusted down in 2015 reflecting reduced size of proposed Station 80
Land Use Type System wide
C&E
Res/Com
Split
New Dev
Share
Impact & LOS
Contribution Fee
Single Family $95,468,923 73%90%$1,907.88
Multi Family $95,468,923 73%90%$1,796.04
COMM/IND $95,468,923 27%80%$1.55
HOSP/MED/CIV/SCH/CHUR $95,468,923 27%80%$1.03
ASSISTED CARE $95,468,923 27%80%$2.06
Usage Factor ERF Factor Projected New
Units 2011 - 2035
LOS Formula Calculation
Residential
58%1
42%1.3
19,068 living units
19,068 living units
Commercial
30%3 12,000,000 sq ft
30%2 12,000,000 sq ft
40%3 12,000,000 sq ft
EXHIBIT A 8.a
Packet Pg. 61
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
26 | P a g e
9 Capital Cost Summaries
9.1 Equipment Inventory, Life Cycle and Cost
Total
Equipment Type Quantity Avg Cost LifeCycle 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Fire Hose 1249 $208 20-Yrs $10,831 $5,213 $19,348 $43,751 $3,093 $1,186 $83,422
Fire Hose Nozzles 160 $1,150 15-Yrs $13,400 $13,400 $13,400 $0 $0 $0 $40,200
Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA)137 $3,895 10-Yrs $586,977 $0 $0 $0 $586,977
SCBA Air Bottles 292 $870 10-Yrs $249,523 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $249,523
SCBA Misc -Masks, SABA Fill Stations NA NA 10-Yrs $310,392 $0 $0 $0 $310,392
Ballistic Vests 160 $525 5-Yrs $50,000 $13,125 $13,125 $5,250 $0 $5,250 $86,750
Ops Mobile Radios 55 $5,200 10-Yrs $0 $0 $5,200 $5,200 $5,200 $5,200 $20,800
Ops Portable Radios 168 $3,900 10-Yrs $23,400 $7,800 $7,800 $7,800 $7,800 $7,800 $62,400
Personal Protective Gear - Fire 350 $3,100 10-Yrs $244,420 $211,633 $249,076 $125,721 $149,938 $201,471 $1,182,259
Personal Protective Gear - Haz-Mat 20 $3,400 8-Yrs $20,000 $0 $20,000 $0 $20,000 $0 $60,000
Haz-Mat Equipment 76 $5,808 3+Yrs $97,350 $101,200 $100,430 $63,470 $46,640 $32,340 $441,430
Small Equipment 188 NA 3+Yrs $71,753 $96,843 $106,043 $91,343 $100,353 $59,990 $526,325
Defibrillators 20 $11,000 10-Yrs $0 $0 $60,000 $60,000 $0 $0 $120,000
Fuel Pumps 8 $25,000 25-Yrs $0 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $0 $25,000 $100,000
Above Ground Fuel Tanks 4 $15,000 25-Yrs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Steri Lifts 2 $17,000 20-Yrs $17,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $17,000 $34,000
Forklifts 3 $35,200 15-Yrs $0 $35,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,200
Steam Cleaner 1 $17,325 20-Yrs $0 $17,325 $0 $0 $0 $0 $17,325
Whole Shop Compressor 1 $14,053 20-Yrs $14,053 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,053
Thermal Imaging Cameras 12 $9,837 10-Yrs $20,000 $30,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $10,000 $120,000
Fire Training Burn Props 2 NA 10-Yrs $48,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $48,000
Ground Ladders $0
Water Rescue Equipment $0
Emergency Mgt/ECC Coms & Computer Equip 38 NA 5+$13,200 $18,480 $13,200 $13,200 $13,200 $13,200 $84,480
Technical Rescue Equipment $0
Hydrant Retrofit (storz connections)5000 $235 40-yrs $67,253 $67,253 $67,253 $8,772 $0 $0 $210,531
$1,857,552 $642,472 $729,875 $469,507 $356,224 $378,437 $4,434,067
$4,434,067
6 - Year (2018 - 2023) Special Equipment Costs
6 - Year Total
9.2 Asset Preservation Costs
Station 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total
71 $12 $15 $54 $40 $40 $15 $176
72 $0 $94 $33 $0 $15 $0 $142
73 $40 $80 $40 $63 $40 $15 $278
74 $15 $12 $0 $0 $0 $0 $27
75 $53 $73 $40 $40 $40 $15 $261
76 $80 $33 $12 $40 $40 $40 $245
77 $50 $31 $8 $12 $67 $15 $183
78 $101 $25 $18 $0 $0 $0 $144
Emer Mgmt $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
App Shop $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Training $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Admin $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total $351 $363 $205 $195 $242 $100 $1,455
Capital Improvements Neccesary to Maintain Existing Assets
EXHIBIT A 8.a
Packet Pg. 62
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
27 | P a g e
9.3 IT Capital Costs
Fire Equipment Quantity Avg Cost LifeCycle 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Totals
Mobile Data Computers 40 $3,000 5-Yrs $28 $45 $45 $30 $30 $30 $208
Desktop PC's 200 $1,000 5-Yrs $40 $40 $40 $40 $40 $40 $240
Laptops/Tablets 60 $1,400 4-Yrs $21 $21 $21 $21 $21 $21 $126
ESO Field Tablets 25 $2,500 4-Yrs $63 $0 $0 $0 $63 $0 $125
iPads for Tablet Command 20 $1,200 3-Yrs $1 $1 $1 $24 $1 $1 $30
Wensoft-Sales Pad 1 $0 $75 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75
Command Unit Mods 2 $0 $15 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15
IT Life Cycle Capital $153 $197 $107 $115 $155 $92 $819
IT Independence Project NA Variable $0 $595 $100 $0 $40 $110 $845
$153 $792 $207 $115 $195 $202 $1,6646 Year Total
6 - Year (2016 - 2021) Special Equipment Costs in Thousands of 2016 Dollars
Equipment Description Quantity Avg Cost LifeCycle 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Totals
Mobile Data Computers 50 $6,000 5-Yrs $50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50
Desktop PC's 200 $1,000 5-Yrs $40 $40 $40 $40 $0 $0 $160
Laptops/Tablets 60 $1,400 4-Yrs $15 $21 $21 $21 $0 $0 $78
ESO Field Tablets 25 $1,500 4-Yrs $15 $0 $62 $0 $63 $0 $140
iPads for Tablet Command 30 $1,200 3-Yrs $36 $0 $0 $40 $0 $0 $76
ESO Enhancements System 4-Yrs $0 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $25
ValleyCom SQL Project for Tablet Command 7-Yrs $0 $70 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70
Dedicated wifi for SKCFTC 5-Yrs $0 $5 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5
Mobile Device Management 5-Yrs $0 $15 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15
Telestaff upgrade to SQL Server 5-Yrs $0 $11 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11
Regionalization Support 5-Yrs $0 $30 $20 $15 $10 $10 $85
FDCARES-Planning data management and analysis 5-Yrs $0 $350 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350
IT Independence Project NA Variable $425 $40 $125 $218 $22 $2 $832
6 Year Total $581 $587 $273 $339 $100 $17 $1,897
6 - Year (2018 - 2023) Special Equipment Costs in Thousands of 2017 Dollars
9.4 Fixed Facility Construction Projects
Station Project 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Totals
64th Ave $0 $43 $1,088 $86 $1,473 $2,876 $5,566
Benson $50 $12 $12 $12 $12 $227 $325
Riverview $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Covington $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
75 Move $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Yearly Totals $50 $55 $1,100 $98 $1,485 $3,103 $5,891
6-Year Contstruction Cost Summary and Timline in Thousands of Dollars
Station Project 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Totals
64th Ave $0 $875 $838 $1,072 $3,638 $699 $7,122
Benson $40 $44 $44 $44 $344 $44 $561
Riverview $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Covington $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
75 Move $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Yearly Totals $40 $919 $882 $1,116 $3,983 $744 $7,683
6-Year Contstruction Cost Summary and Timline in Thousands of Dollars
EXHIBIT A 8.a
Packet Pg. 63
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
28 | P a g e
9.5 Apparatus Funding Schedule
Unit Type 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Totals
Aid Car/Ambulances $0 $123 $261 $0 $123 $0 $507
Fire Engines $672 $868 $838 $996 $824 $1,030 $5,228
Has-Mat Vehicles $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Flood / Water Rescue $42 $0 $0 $0 $3 $0 $45
Ladder Trucks $0 $0 $0 $319 $319 $319 $957
Light Trucks $0 $52 $0 $0 $181 $0 $233
Pump Test/Generator $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Command/Staff Cars $0 $171 $47 $165 $47 $146 $576
Staff Support Cars $0 $117 $28 $38 $148 $114 $445
Utility Trailers $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Ops Support Units $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Tender $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Skyboom - Quint $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$714 $1,331 $1,174 $1,518 $1,645 $1,609 $7,991
6 Year (2016 - 2021) Apparatus Costs
EXHIBIT A 8.a
Packet Pg. 64
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
29 | P a g e
10 Inventories
10.1 Apparatus Inventory & Funding Schedule
Unit # Year Unit Type 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Totals
21 2000 SUV $0 $0 $48 $0 $0 $0 $48
22 2003 SUV $0 $75 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75
24 2006 SUV $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $33 $33
115 1997 Engine $227 $227 $227 $227 $0 $0 $908
116 1998 Aid $134 $134 $0 $0 $0 $0 $268
117 2000 Engine $227 $227 $227 $227 $0 $0 $908
702 2003
Aid $0 $268 $0 $0 $0 $0 $268
703 2003
Aid $0 $0 $268 $0 $0 $0 $268
704 2005
Aid $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $268 $268
705 2007
Aid $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
706 2001
Engine $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $279 $279
707 2003
PU $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $59 $59
708 2001
Engine $0 $0 $0 $0 $279 $279 $558
715 1996
Ladder $0 $0 $352 $352 $352 $352 $1,408
738 2011
PU $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45 $45
763 1994
Utility Tr $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3 $3
764 1995
PU $0 $0 $40 $0 $0 $0 $40
765 2000
Boat Tr $0 $0 $3 $0 $0 $0 $3
766 2001
Engine $0 $0 $193 $193 $193 $193 $772
767 2001
Engine $0 $0 $193 $193 $193 $193 $772
768 2014 Ladder $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
769 2016
Engine $127 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $127
770 2016
Engine $127 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $127
771 2016
Engine $172 $172 $0 $0 $0 $0 $344
777 Rescue Boat $43 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $43
778 2017
SUV Bat $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
7100 2008
PU $0 $0 $44 $0 $0 $0 $44
7101 2007
Shelter Tr $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
7102 2006
SUV $48 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $48
7104 2006
SUV $0 $0 $0 $72 $0 $0 $72
7106 2007
SUV $0 $0 $0 $33 $0 $0 $33
7107 2012
Cross $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $33 $33
7122 2006
SUV $48 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $48
7202 2008
Cross $0 $0 $33 $0 $0 $0 $33
7204 2008
PU $0 $0 $0 $41 $0 $0 $41
7205 2008
PU $0 $0 $44 $0 $0 $0 $44
7206 2008
Cross $0 $0 $0 $32 $0 $0 $32
7608 1998
Cross $0 $40 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40
7610 2000
Car $0 $0 $32 $0 $0 $0 $32
7619 2001
Mini Van $0 $0 $0 $30 $0 $0 $30
7620 2001
Car $0 $0 $0 $32 $0 $0 $32
7625 2000
Mini Van $0 $0 $0 $30 $0 $0 $30
7628 1997
Mini Van $0 $0 $33 $0 $0 $0 $33
7630 1999
Cross $0 $0 $41 $0 $0 $0 $41
7633 2000
PU $0 $0 $32 $0 $0 $0 $32
7634 2000
PU $0 $0 $32 $0 $0 $0 $32
7636 2000
Mini Van $0 $0 $30 $0 $0 $0 $30
9904 2006
SUV $0 $48 $0 $0 $0 $0 $48
TBD 2018 Brush Truck $130 $130 $0 $0 $0 $0 $260
$1,283 $1,321 $1,872 $1,462 $1,017 $1,737 $8,692
6 Year Replacement Schedule
Total Annual Cost
EXHIBIT A 8.a
Packet Pg. 65
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
F
i
r
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
2
0
1
8
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
(
1
4
3
7
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
F
i
r
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
Derek Matheson, Chief Administrative Officer
220 Fourth Ave S
Kent, WA 98032
256-856-5712
DATE: November 6, 2018
TO: Operations Committee
SUBJECT: Ordinances Amending Comp Plan & City Code to Incorporate
School District Capital Facilities Plans and Update School
Impact Fees
MOTION: Recommend to the City Council adoption of two ordinances
updating the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan and
Chapter 12.13 Kent City Code to incorporate the 2018/19 - 2023/24
Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline
School Districts with updated School Impact Fees.
SUMMARY: Kent City Code authorizes school impact fees on behalf of any school
district which provides to the City a capital facilities plan; the plan is adopted by
reference as part of the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan.
The Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School Districts submitted the annual
update to their capital facilities plans, and on October 16, 2018, the City Council
held a public hearing on the plans. Any Council action on the comprehensive plan
amendment pertaining to the school district capital facilities plans and associated
impact fees is taken concurrently with adoption of the budget.
BUDGET IMPACT: N/A
SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL:
Inclusive Community, Thriving City
RECOMMENDED BY: Kurt Hanson
ATTACHMENTS:
1. SchoolImpact Fees-2019 Ord_withnewmax (PDF)
2. CompPlanAmend-SchoolDistCapitalFacilitiesPlans-2019-2024- (PDF)
3. Fed Way Cap Facilities Plan (PDF)
4. Highline CAPFIP 2018-2023_PLAN-DOC_06-27-18 (PDF)
5. ASD Cap Facilities Plan 2018-2024 FINAL (PDF)
6. KSD_2018 Capital Facilities Plan (PDF)
9
Packet Pg. 66
1 School Impact Fees – 2018-2019
ORDINANCE NO. ________
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, amending Section
12.13.160 of the Kent City Code to adjust the
school impact fee schedules (CPA-2018-4).
RECITALS
A. The City of Kent has adopted a school impact fee program as
authorized by the State Growth Management Act (GMA) and RCW
82.02.050.
B. Chapter 12.13 of the Kent City Code (KCC) requires that the
Capital Facilities Plans of school districts be submitted to the City of Kent
on an annual basis for City Council review, and that this review must occur
in conjunction with any update of the Capital Facilities Element of the
City's Comprehensive Plan. The City Council has reviewed the Capital
Facilities Plans submitted by the school districts.
C. The Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School Districts
have requested amendments to the text of Kent City Code to reflect
proposed changes to impact fees.
D. On September 18, 2018, the City provided the required 60
day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 to the State of Washington of the
9.a
Packet Pg. 67
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
S
c
h
o
o
l
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
-
2
0
1
9
O
r
d
_
w
i
t
h
n
e
w
m
a
x
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2 School Impact Fees – 2018-2019
City’s proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the
Comprehensive Plan and Chapter 12.13 of the KCC. The 60 day notice
period has passed and by operation of law is deemed approved.
E. After a public hearing before the City Council on November 6,
2018, the City Council on December 11, 2018, approved Comprehensive
Plan Amendment CPA-2018-4 to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the
Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School Districts, and changes to
the Kent City Code to reflect impact fees as follows: (1) for the Kent
School District, increasing the school impact fee for single-family units to
$5,397, and for multifamily units to $2,279; (2) for the Federal Way
School District, increasing the school impact fee for single-family units to
$7,221, and for multifamily units to $8,755; (3) for the Auburn School
District, increasing the school impact fee for single-family units to $5,716,
and increasing the school impact fee for multifamily units to $4,488; and
(4) for the Highline School District, increasing the school impact fee for
single-family units to $2,573 and for multifamily units to $3,646.
F. In order to implement the new impact fee schedules
referenced above, it is necessary to amend section 12.13.160 KCC.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT,
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE
SECTION 1. – Amendment. Section 12.13.160 of the Kent City
Code is hereby amended as follows:
Sec. 12.13.160. Base fee schedule.
The following fee shall be assessed for the indicated types of
development:
9.a
Packet Pg. 68
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
S
c
h
o
o
l
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
-
2
0
1
9
O
r
d
_
w
i
t
h
n
e
w
m
a
x
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
3 School Impact Fees – 2018-2019
School
District
Single-Family Multifamily Multifamily
Studio
Kent,
No. 415
$5,3975,235.00 $2,2792,267.00 $0.00
Federal
Way, No.
210
$7,2213,198.00 $8,7558,386.00 0.00
Auburn,
No. 408
$5,7163,321.86 $4,4882,081.29 0.00
Highline,
No. 401
$2,5732,290.00 $3,6463,162.00 0.00
SECTION 2. – Amendment. Section 12.13.170 of the Kent City
Code is hereby amended as follows:
Sec. 12.13.170. Maximum allowable fees. School impact fees
provided by this chapter shall be assessed based on the calculation set
forth in KCC 12.13.140, unless they exceed a maximum allowable fee as
set forth in this section. There shall be an increase in the maximum
allowable fee each year by the same percentage as the percentage change
in the previous calendar year’s average monthly Engineering News Record
(ENR) Seattle Area Construction Cost Index values, relative to the
corresponding average monthly ENR Construction Cost Index values for
the preceding year, as calculated from October 1st through September
30th.
The maximum allowable fee is set at $8,591 for single-family dwelling
units and a maximum of $8,755 for multifamily dwelling units for 2019.
9.a
Packet Pg. 69
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
S
c
h
o
o
l
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
-
2
0
1
9
O
r
d
_
w
i
t
h
n
e
w
m
a
x
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
4 School Impact Fees – 2018-2019
SECTION 3. - Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon
approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are
authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the
correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering;
or references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or
regulations.
SECTION 4. – Severability. If any one or more section, subsection,
or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, that
decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this
ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 4. – Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and
be in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law.
DANA RALPH, MAYOR Date Approved
ATTEST:
KIMBERLEY A. KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted
Date Published
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
PAT FITZPATRICK, CITY ATTORNEY
S:\Permit\Plan\COMP_PLAN_AMENDMENTS\2018\School District Cap Fac Plans\Schoolimpact Fees-2019 Ord.Docx
9.a
Packet Pg. 70
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
S
c
h
o
o
l
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
-
2
0
1
9
O
r
d
_
w
i
t
h
n
e
w
m
a
x
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
2018/19 – 2023/24 School Dist. Capital
Facilities Plans
1
ORDINANCE NO.________
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, amending the Kent
Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities
Element to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the
Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School
Districts (CPA-2018-5).
RECITALS
A. The State of Washington Growth Management Act (GMA)
requires internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements and the
plans from other jurisdictions.
B. To assure that comprehensive plans remain relevant and up
to date, the GMA allows amendments to the capital facilities element of
comprehensive plans concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a
city budget. RCW 36.70A.130(2)(a)(iv).
C. The City of Kent has established procedures for amending the
Comprehensive Plan in Chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code (KCC),
allowing amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the
Comprehensive Plan concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the
City budget and allowing the City Council to hold the public hearing
instead of the Land Use and Planning Board. KCC 12.02.010.
9.b
Packet Pg. 71
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
-
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
-
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
2018/19 – 2023/24 School Dist. Capital
Facilities Plans
2
D. The Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School Districts
have submitted proposed amendments to their Capital Facilities Plans to
be included in an amendment of the City’s Capital Facilities Element of the
Comprehensive Plan.
E. After providing appropriate public notice, the City Council of
the City of Kent considered the requested Comprehensive Plan
amendment and held a public hearing on the same on October 16, 2018.
F. On September 18, 2018, the City provided the required 60
day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 to the State of Washington of the
City’s proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the
Comprehensive Plan. The 60 day notice period has passed, and by
operation of law, it is deemed approved.
G. On November 20, 2018, the City Council of the City of Kent
approved the Capital Facilities Element amendment CPA-2018-5 to include
the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline
School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit “A” attached and incorporated by
this reference.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT,
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE
SECTION 1. - Amendment. The Kent Comprehensive Plan, and its
Capital Facilities Element, are amended to include the Capital Facilities
Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School Districts, as
set forth in Exhibit “A” attached and incorporated by this reference (CPA-
2018-5).
9.b
Packet Pg. 72
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
-
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
-
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
3 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
2018/19 – 2023/24 School Dist. Capital
Facilities Plans
3
SECTION 2. – Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon
approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are
authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the
correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering;
or references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or
regulations.
SECTION 3. – Severability. If any one or more section, subsection,
or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, that
decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this
ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 4. – Effective Date. This ordinance will take effect and be
in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law.
DANA RALPH, MAYOR Date Approved
ATTEST:
KIMBERLEY A. KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted
Date Published
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
PAT FITZPATRICK, CITY ATTORNEY
9.b
Packet Pg. 73
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
-
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
-
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
4 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
2018/19 – 2023/24 School Dist. Capital
Facilities Plans
4
9.b
Packet Pg. 74
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
-
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
-
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
)
FEDERAL WAY,
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Each Scholar: A voice. A dream. A BRIGHT future.
CAPITAL FACI LITIES PLAN
Thomas Jefferson High School Mirror Lake Elementary School
Wildwood Elementary School Lake Grove Elementary School
20L9
9.c
Packet Pg. 75
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
2019
CAPITAL FÄCILITIES PLAN
I.!l[ay 29,2018
BOARD OF EDUCATION
Hiroshi Eto
Carol Gregory
Geoffery McAnalloy
Mildred Ollée
Claire Wilson
SUPERINTENDENT
Dr. TammyCampbell
Prepared by: Sally D. Mclean, Chief Finance & Operations Officer
Jennifer Wojciechowski, Student & Demo graphic Forecaster
9.c
Packet Pg. 76
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
SECTION I THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Introduction
Inventory of Educational Facilities
Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities
Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities
Needs Forecast - New Facilities
Six Year Finance Plan
SECTION 2 MAPS
Introduction
Map - Elementary Boundaries
Map - Middle School Boundaries
Map - High School Boundaries
Map - City and County Jurisdictions
SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
Introduction
Building Capacities
Portable Locations
Student Forecast
SECTION 4
I
2-3
4
5
6
7
8
9
15
16-1 8
19-20
2I-23
10
11
I2
13
t4
24
25-29
30-3 1
32-33
34
35
KING COLINTY, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, AND
CITY OF KENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
Introduction
Capacity Summaries
Impact Fee Calculations
Reference to Impact Fee Calculations
Student Generation Rates
Impact Fee Changes from 2018 to 2019
1
9.c
Packet Pg. 77
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
INTRODU CTION
In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act
(SHB) 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee
Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249
effective December 2I, 1995 as amended, City of Kent Ordinance No.3260 effective
March 7996, and the City of Aubum Ordinance No. 5078 effective 1998, Federal Way
Public Schools has updated its 2019 Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2018.
This Plan is scheduled for adoption by King County, the City of Kent, City of Federal Way
and the City of Aubum and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction
by reference. This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive
Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact
fcc ordinance. Tho City of Des Moines collects school impact fees as part of the SEPA
process.
The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within
which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council
adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line
Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way
planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County
will encourage and aetively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's
need for housing, jobs, services, culture, and recreation. This Plan's estimated population
growth is prepared with this underlying assumption.
This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any juriscliction, which
requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not
intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may
prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies or management need.
During the 2016-17 school year the District formed a 100 member Facilities Planning
Committee consisting of parents, community members and staff. The Committee was
tasked with developing a recommendation to the Superintendent regarding Phase 2 of the
District's plan for school construction, remodeling, andlor modernization for voter
consideration in November 2017. The voters passed this $450M bond authorization with
a 620/o YES vote reflecting a commitment to invest in the modernization of our
infrastructure. Through the committee's work a determination was made to rebuild
Thomas Jefferson High School, Illahee Middle School, Totem Middle School, Lake
Grove Elementary, Mirror Lake Elementary, Olympic View Elementary, Star Lake
Elementary, and Wildwood Elementary. In addition to the school projects, the committee
included a plan to modernize Memorial Stadium, which currently supports athletic
activities for all schools. The rebuilding of the aforementioned schools will create
additional capacity for sfudents at the elementary and high school levels. The expanded
capacity supplants the need for additional elementary schools.
2
9.c
Packet Pg. 78
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
INTRODUCTION. continued
As we are in the planning stages for the newly approved bond projects, we are entering
the final phase of the $106 million project replacing Federal Way High School. The new
facility will increased capacity by approximately 200 students and is expected to be
completed by winter 2018. The costs of this additional capacity is excluded from the
2019 school impact fee calculations.
The District continues to monitor factors that may have an impact on enrollment and
capacity at our schools. In accordance with the McCleary decision, the State has
provided funding to reduce K-3 class size to 17 and 4-12 class size to 25. Initiative
Measure No. 1351 would fuither reduce these class sizes in schools where more than
50% of students were eligible for free and reduced-price meals in the prior year. Under
this measure, class sizes in those schools would be reduced to 15 in grades K-3,22 in
grade 4, and 23 in grades 5-12. The additional class size reductions required by Initiative
1351 would increase our classroom need from 60 to 120 at our Elementary & K-8
schools and add a need for an additional 26 classrooms at our Secondary schools.
We will also continue to study school boundaries as new housing and fluctuating
populations impact specific schools. Some shifts in boundaries may be required in the
coming years. At this time with more than 1,000 unhoused elementary students,
boundary adjustments cannot resolve the need for additional capacity. The maps
included in this Plan reflect the boundaries for the 2018-19 school year.
)J
9.c
Packet Pg. 79
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION 1- THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be
gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing
community.
This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and
expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. A Financial Plan
that shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization listed
follows this.
4
9.c
Packet Pg. 80
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 20I9 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (K-5I
Adelaide
Brigadoon
Camelot
Enterprise
Green Gables
Lake Dolloff
Lake Grove
Lakeland
Mark Twain
Meredith Hill
Mirror Lake
Nautilus (K-8)
Olympic View
Panther Lake
Rainier View
Sherwood Forest
Silver Lake
Star Lake
Sunnycrest
Twin Lakes
Valhalla
V/ildwood
Woodrnont (K-8)
MIDDLE SCHOOLS 16-8I
Federal Way Public Acaderny (6-10)
Illahee
Kilo
Lakota
Sacajawea
Sequoyah
Totem
TAF @ Saghalie (6-12)
HIGH SCHOOLS (9-12)
Decatur
Federal Way
Thomas Jefferson
Todd Bearner
Career Academy at Trurnan
ADDITIONAL SCHOOLS
Internet Acaderny (K- I 2)
Employment Transition Prograrn ( I 2+)
Federal Way Open Doors
1635 SV/ 304th St
3601 sw 336th Sr
4041 S 298th St
35101 5t" Ave SW
32607 47tt' Ave SW
4200 s 308tr'st
303 SW 30gth St
35827 32"d Ave S
2450 S Star Lake Rd
5830 S 300,h Sr
625 S 314t" Sr
1000 s 28gtr' sr
2626 SW 327thSt
34424 I'r Ave S
3015 S 368'h St
3460012tt' Ave SW
1310 sw 325tr'Pl
4014 S 270th St
24629 42d Ave S
4400 Sw 320th St
27847 42ú Ave S
2405 S 300th Sr
2645416t1' Ave S
Federal Way
Federal Way
Auburn
Federal Way
Federal Way
Aubum
Federal Way
Auburn
Federal Way
Auburn
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
Kent
Kent
Federal Way
Auburn
Federal Way
Des Moines
98023
98023
98001
98023
98023
98001
98023
98001
98003
98001
98003
98003
98023
98003
98003
98023
98023
98032
98032
98023
98001
98003
98198
98003
98003
9800 I
98023
98003
98001
98032
98023
34620 9rt' Ave S
36001 l't Ave S
4400 S 308th Sr
14l5 sw 3l4th st
I l0l S Dash Point Rd
3450 S 360tr'ST
26630 40rt' Ave S
3391419tt' Ave SW
2800 sw 320th st
30611 l6tr'Ave S
4249 S 2ggtr' St
3599916tt' Ave S
31455 28t" Ave S
31455 28t" Ave S
33250 21't Ave SW
31455 28tr'Ave S
Federal Way
Federal Way
Auburn
Federal Way
Federal Way
Aubum
Kent
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
Auburn
Federal Way
Federal V/ay
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
98023
98003
98001
98003
98003
98003
98023
98003
5
9.c
Packet Pg. 81
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CURRENT INVENTORY NON.INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES
Developed Propertv
Central Kitchen
Federal Way Memorial Field
Educational Services Center
Support Services Center
1214 S 332"d
1300 s 308th st
33330 8th Ave S
1211 S 332nd St
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
98003
98003
98003
98003
Leased Propertv
Early Learning Center at Uptown 1066 S 320th St
Square
Federal Way 98003
Undeveloped Propertv
Site
#
Location
75 SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW - 9.2 Acres
65 S 35lst Street &,52nd Avenue S - 8.8 Acres
60 E of 10th Avenue SW - SW 334th & SW 335th Streets - 10.04 Acres
73 N of SW 320th and east of 45th PL SW - 23.45 Acres
7l S 344th Street &.46th Avenue S - 17.47 Acres
82 l't Way S and S 342nd St - Minimal acreage
96 S 308th St and 14th Ave S - .36 Acres
Notes:
Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction
requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed
to house students in the District.
6
9.c
Packet Pg. 82
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2OI9 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
NEEDS FORECAST. EXISTING FACILITIES
As parl of the multi-phase plan, the District intends to increase capacity for elementary
and high school students with expansion at the Thomas Jefferson, Lake Grove, Mirror
Lake, Olympic View, Star Lake, and Wildwood sites. Increased capacity at the five
elementary schools listed and additional elementary schools in later phases, supplant the
need for construction of a twenty-fourth elementary school. Only projects in Phase II
with plans to increase capacity are included in the impact fee calculation for this plan.
1
PHASE EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF
FUNDS
On-
golng
Purchase and Relocate
Portables
Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is
Impact Fees.
Thomas Jefferson High
School
Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
Voter Approved Capital bond
II Illahee Middle School Replace Existing Buildine Voter Approved Capital bond
T Totem Middle School Replace Existins Buildrne Voter Approved Capital bond
II Lake Grove Elementary Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
Voter Approved Capital bond
II Mark Twain Elernentary Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
TBD, pending SCAP funding
II Mirror Lake Elementary Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
Voter Approved Capital bond
Olynpic View K-8 School Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
Voter Approved Capital bond
II Star Lake Elernentary Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
Voter Approved Capital bond
II Wildwood Elementary Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
Voter Approved Capital bond
il Memorial Stadium Replace Existing Facility Voter Approved Capital bond
III Decatur High School Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
TBD
III Kilo Middle School Replace Existing Buildine TBD
III Sacajawea Middle School Replace Existing Buildine TBD
ilI Adelaide Elernentary Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
TBD
III Brigadoon Elernentary Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
TBD
III Camelot Elernentarv Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
TBD
III Lake Dolloff Elementary Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
TBD
III Nautilus K-8 School Replace Existing Building,
lncrease Capacity
TBD
III Twin Lakes Elernentary Replace Existing Building,
lncrease Capacity
TBD
III Woodrnont K-8 School Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
TBD
9.c
Packet Pg. 83
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2CI19 CAPITAL FACILITIES PT,AN
NEEDS FORECAST . ADDITIONAL F'ACILITIES
PATED URCE OF FUNDSNEW F
No current plans for additional facilities
B
9.c
Packet Pg. 84
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
6-YEAR FINANCE PLAN
Secured Fmding
lss:o *1J'
s8 550 89?
1? ¡51m5
stl-660-*t9
Sørcc
haod Fs 11'
Iãd Sd. Ëhd< t,
B6dorl*rFeds f]ì
Scùool Cømeim.,\ssisæ Proffi fSCAl{ f¿,
TOTÂL
Projected Revenue
Achul and Plmned Expenditurcs
I-OTES:
L Tbæ.fBæqffit¡/bêiúglE{cbåKirgc@ty,Ci!.vofFêdåal$'4,.C4vof,{]¡hrqedCr}.ofKdirFeÌfÈffir-adsi¡be
æihtÞ f6e by úÈDÈüêt åd Ðst@iûçx@. ThisislEðd bøbðëq t).3t11?.
?. Tbb b Je ed h€}úE 6 lL/i lr 7.
3. Thi¡ is t!¡ ll3lr17 bshê of bod fr¡¡s dd €pit¿l1ey ñE&. Thb &re tufr.þs iûffi ffii¡S9 1¡¿ kl'.€ æ ¡eU fú rhe @pþrie of F$T'S.
J. Thbr.pleBúëbåbúæofS.ti,P*.hich*illb+r¡dtoroc@pl*eÌl¿r*ül¿i¡gofFêds¡lç.¿l,IliÉS{hol"
Tlis þ úê b6læ ø 11,31/1?.
5. Tti3 È úttipsr¿d SC"{P f6 t¡È f¡@ projs dtøized by t¡È vom b }01?.
6. TtÈ ii a Hred K-j Clas sizerôr:tiø g!d.
I t!Nov@¡620!t.ttÊÐisüidpß*dâ5a50Mbøéæ. Theætiacl¡d¿diatlcfreæpbûisfüprojdsl!ãrwi11@t.ldditiñálspacù. OltyúêGr3eidedFit!reiøgøFocit'æbha"d
ia scùôol iEpsct f* dbE rtiß. Sæ pøg¿ m
S. Tbae æ m pro¡øcd eleoi$ç*ß prop6m
9. Th* æ projded f6 bsêd ùpod atäp{tèd r$idetiel daetof@b i! t}e Disi¡r, SlJ,000 pü@r! ñ l¡Ê d 6 }w.
t0. kojd bodCds b6êd e {:ffiæt *rids s of¡øl20lg.
tl.N@CãtãqmpEch¿sdi¡:010totosúeÊdpt¡yffitTæitiúhott@ fteSl.l\lpü{ûæbásbÈ¿fGrcedl¡ro€La#e¡e,pre?dlocjtpco?r@t¡ro¡+hl0l0.
12, Thxe fæ ¡¿øËar t!¿ d of Ptrúsirs ðd i$E¡i!€ w p.{tzbhs- The pür¡bþ ryãdiæ à Ëtue }e3 øy ¡epf* qistiry pon¿öIEs tlât æ d Þdi@I.T¡seyrcri@cqËityedæ$¡itrlûd.dirtt øper!.slú@y. g
TOT.{¡
sð9pú0939Bsuu¿
s:6rmml¡i-
SgS-47O-lXI¡ll !:1
It:lTdl
20lg1lY!5 ll:,
$ó.5m.0001Ì .
$ãrmmll-
$10,lm.0ool[i
çtmmlll]l
sfii-dmmltl---wmmltlìr
SSIó(m&l0ll¡: :ì
uilmll: i:!
t¿r:::
sol!:1,:
solf..i
ll::. :
il' :
34?0 OtxltÌ: :
----------18=
lf, i
smmlÌ:
2@,{
1ro1m<
s¿3mm
12? {fB ffi
s?m m
î21 9{n fim
2ù23
2ùtL2/
lXmm
s2ûû m
wmm
1Ma
AO2'':23
51-500.00{
t6ffim
52ûO ün
stt-rmffi
2l¡1t
282rn
sE2 {m û0ú
Î1t ?mm
sa00-000
s167,?ôo-msl37-a00-fi|0
20?o
tmLlt
\?¡ffim
(qlmm
ü1 gfiXXX)
s40-00{¡(m
9??mm
9mm
2019
?ot9-10
st! lmm
1ìmm
s6rm(n
s2ji.m{
$mm
3ùded
20t&tc
s1 lmm
ll ?mm
s?]J.0ü
sffim
sl1935.û00
TIiIPOR{RYFACA,ÍIIIS
PorBb¡es 112'ì
9.c
Packet Pg. 85
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2OI9 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION 2. MAPS
Federal Way Public Schools has twenty-one elementary schools (grades K-5), two schools
with a K-8 grade configuration, six middle school schools (grades 6-8), four high schools
(grades 9-12) andtwo small secondary schools. The Federal Way Public Academy serves
students in grades 6-10. The programs at Career Academy at Truman High School serves
students in grades 9-12. In addition to these programs, TAF@Saghalie serves students in
grades 6-12 who reside within the service area.
The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school, by school type.
(Career Academy at Truman High School, Open Doors and Federal Way Public Academy
serve students from throughout the District). The identified boundaries are reviewed
annually. Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs that affect school
populations may necessitate a change in school service areas.
The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility
infrastruchrre is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public
facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to
that development. School Districts are different. If the District does not have permanent
facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or
until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding
facilities.
Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly.
It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change
schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school.
It is important to rcalize that a single housing development does not require the
construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth
throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the
district, not just around a single development.
The final map included represents the city and county boundaries which overlap with the
district's service areas.
r City of Algona
r City of Auburn
r City of Des Moines
. City of Federal Way
. City of Kent
. CityofMilton
¡ Unincorporated King County
10
9.c
Packet Pg. 86
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
MAP _ ELEMENTARY BOUNDARIBS
k FEDERAL WAY
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
I e,-c,ve¡.r¿ny sorooLs
T ADCLAIDE !LEMENTARY
2 BRIGADOONTTTMTNTIIRY
3 CAMETOT ETEMENTI\RY
¡¡ TNÏERPRISË€I"ËMËNTÂRY
5 GREEN 6ABI€S ÊLEMENTÂRY
6 IAKÊ DOLTOFF EI-EMENTÁRY
7 TÂ(E GROVT II.IMENTARY
I LilKtlltNDtttMlNTÂRYg MARK TWAIN IIIMTNTÂRV
10 MIRTDIT}I IIIIL TLTMTNTARY
r1 MIRRORIAKEELEMINIARY
l2 NAUT|IUS t(,8 SCl100t
1-3 OTYMPIC VIEW ETÊMENTARY
14 PANTHER I"AKE EI.ÊMENfARY
15 RAINIER VITW TTEMENTARY
¡6 SIIERWOOD FOREST ETTMENTARY
17 SII.VER tÂKÊ EI.ËMENTARY
18 SÏÁR TAKI ELEMENÍA.RY
tg SUNNYCRESTTTTMENTARY
20 TWIN TAI(ES EI.EMËNIARY
21 V Lll^LLA tLErvlCNT^RY
22 WIDWOOD ELEMTN]ARY
23 WOODMONTK-8SCIOOL
I nrrps pRopERw
ELEMENTARY
BOUNDARIES
- MDDIE scHooLs
3Ti FWPUBUCACADEIVIY
30 ILIAHÊE MIOÞLE SCHOOL
31 K|LO MrDDtf SCHOOL
32 IAKOTA MIDDIE SCHOOI
33 SACAJAWEA MIDDTE sCH(X)I
37 SEQUOYAHMTODITSCHOOL
35 TOTEMMIDDTESCHOOL
38 ÍAr @sAcHALrE
: , HIGH SCHOOL5¡tO DECÂTUR HIGH
4L FtDtRÂt" W^Y ü6il
421 TilOM^SJEFTERSONiltGil
45 TODD 8€AMER HIGH
490 CARETRACÄIJEMY úùTRUMAN
5l ITP/NORMAN CIMTIR
I eoN¡¡¡¡srn¡r¡vE srrEs
:t¡:¡,lr.
I
11
N
v m.16.3 0.6 0.9 1.2E-rÞl¡les
Þate:7.1.17
9.c
Packet Pg. 87
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDER\L WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
MAP _ MIDDLE SCHOOL BOUNDARIBS
fir FEDERAL WAY
PUBLTC SCHOOLS
I u.etrururonv scuools
r ADELAIDE ELEMENTARY
2 BRIGADOON ELTMINTARY
3 CJ\METOT ÉIEMENT/\RY
4 ËNTERPRISEETfMTNIARY
5 6RÉEN GAEIES ETEMENTARY
6 IÁKT DOTIOFT EIIMENIARY
7 I-AKT GROVE TTEMENIARY
8 TAI(IIÂND ETEMENTARY
9 MARKTWAIN ËIEMCNTARY
1O MERÊDIIH HIIt ËI€MENTÂRY
I1 MIRROR LAKT ETEMINTARY
12 NAUTil.U5 K€ SCHOOI
1.3 OLYMPIC VIËW EI[MENTARY
14 PANTHER TAI(€ ÊLÊMÊNÌAf,Y
15 ßAINIER VIEW [IIMINTABY
16 SIIERWOOD FORESTETIMENTARY
17 SITVER IAI(E EITM€NTARV
r8 STAÊ IAI(E ÊtEMÊNTÂRY
19 SUNNYCRESÍ ELEMENTARY
20 TWIN LAKES EI.EMENTARY
21 VATHAI"TAELEMENTARV
22 Wil"DWOO0 ÊtÊMËNTARY
23 WOODMONT("8SCHOOt
MtÞÞl"E scHooLs
rW PUBUCACADETúY
ITI¡HEE MIDDTE SCHOOt
Klto MtDDt_É scHoot
tAKOÍA NIDDU SCHOOT
SACAJAW€A MIDDI-E SCHOOL
gEQUOYAH MIDDIE SCHOOT
TOIEM MIODLE SCHOOI
TÀF €' SAGHATIE
Ht6il SCilOOIS
OECÂTUR HIGH
F[DCn^r W Y iltGil
TIIOMAS JEFFERSON IIIGII
TODD EEAMER }IIGTI
CARTER ACAOEMY @ TRUMAN
ETP/NORMAN CËNTER
! nor"illttsrnmvc sITES
.
36
30
31
33
l7
35
38
wÊß
{1
421
45
490
51
I rwps PRoPERTY
MIDDLE SCHOOL
BOUNDARIES
&
1i,
æ.10.3 0.5 0.9 r.2r-tlMlles
Dåtê:7-1-17
I2
9.c
Packet Pg. 88
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2OI9 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
MAP - HIGH SCHOOL BOUNDARIES
fï FEDERAL WAY
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
! eteurrurnnvsclrooLs
1 AÞEI-AIDÊ ELEM€NTARY
2 BRIGADOONEI.EMENTARY
3 CÀMEIÕT ELÊMÊNÎARY
4 EÑTERPRISEIIEMENTÂRY
S Gf,EEN GAÊTËS ÉI.EMÊNTAßY
6 TAKE DOII.OFF EIEMENTÂRY
7 LAI(E GROVE EIËMTNTARY
8 IAKEIAND ELEMENTARY
S MARß ÍWAIN ÊTEMENTARV
10 MIRIOIÏII IIITI ETEMENTARY
1T MIRROR !AI(É ËIEMENÍARV
12 NAUTTIUS K.8 SCilOOt
13 OIYMPIC VIEW EI.EMCNIARY
14 PANTHER LAKE ETEMENTARY
15 RAINIÊR VIEW ÊIEMENIARY
16 9HÊRWOOD FORESTEIÊMENÍARY
17 SILVER TÂKE ELEMTNTARY
18 SIAR IA(Ë ÊTEMÊNTÂRY
19 SUNNYCR€SÍ ETEMENTARY
2O TWIN IAKËS ÊTEMENIARY
?1 VATTIAII.AEI.EMSNTARY
22 WIIDWOôD EIEMËNTÂRV
23 WOODMONTX-sSCHOOL
- MrDÞl€sclrools36 FWPUBUCACADEIVTÍ
30 ILIAHEE MIDPLE SCHOOT
31 Kt[O MtDOt¡ SCHOOL
32 TAKOTA MIDDIE SCHOOL
33 SACAJAWEA MIDOTE SCHOÓI
37 SEQUOYAH MIDOI.E SCHOOL
35 TOTEMMIDÞLESCHOOL
38 TAF €} SAG¡IALIE
HtGH SCHOOTS
OEC/\TUR HIGH
FED[RAL Wl\Y }IIGlI
THOM/15 JEFFERSON HIGH
TODÞ BEÂMIR IIIGII
CÁFEER ACADEMY @ TRUMAN
ETP/NORMAN CENTER
I nomrNrsrnmve srïEs
*
40
4t
421
45
490
51
I rwpsPRoPERry
HIGH SCHOOL
BOUNDARIES
#æ.ts.3 0.6 0.9 1.2EMIIQS
Dätè:9.2.16
\i,
13
9.c
Packet Pg. 89
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
FEE}ERAL WAY
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Ê.¡.h s{hÉlsr: A ,/úl(Ê. A dffãdi.
^
lnI€HT future.
Ðes
Algona
Aul¡um
ûes lrloiries
Federal Way
| | xent
I onn
Milton
t
Auburn
King
Algona
Xent
Federal Way
I
¡
û
,-J I
.)j'-(i0i!
Õû
I r' -.i
{i aôa
t*''r' ó
t. ll 'r.t ''ô ta'
Õ
a
,,1
{r,i t*rt
t'
Õ t,
f,lilton
City and County
Jurisdictions? lTdtesgÐ.5 I
I
I
MAP _ CITY AND COUNTY JURISDICTIONS
I4
9.c
Packet Pg. 90
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
Building Capacities - The Education Program
Portable Locations
Student Forecast - 2019 through 2025
15
9.c
Packet Pg. 91
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
BUILDING CAPACITIES
This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of seryice" in order to
ascertain the District's cument and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public
Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not
take into consideration the education program needs.
In general, the District's current target class size provides that the average class size for a
standard classroom for grades K through 3 should be 17 students to comply with current
legislation, however compliance is currently suspended so we are using current average
class sizes. ln grades 4-5 the target is 25 students. For grades 6 to 12 the target class size
is 26 students. Classrooms for students with Individualized Education Program (Special
Education) needs are calculated aT 12 seats per classroom.
Historically, the District has used the OSPI square footage calculation as a baseline for
capacity calculation and made adjustments for specific program needs. The District will
continue to use this calculation for determining capacity at our middle and high schools.
However, with the implementation of smaller K-3 class sizes which requires a significant
reduction in K-3 class sizes, elementary capacity, in this Plan, will be calculated based on
the number of classroom spaces, the number of students assigned to each classroom and
the extent of support facilities available for students, staff, parents, and the community.
Class Size
Guidelines
FWPS Historical
"Standard of Service"
H82661/SH82776
Enacted Law
Square Footage
Guideline
Kindergarten 18.9 t7 25-28
Grades 1-2 18.9 t7 25-28
Grade 3 18.9 l7 28
Grades 4-5 25 25 28
For the pulposes of determining student capacity at individual schools, the following list
clarifies adjustments to classroom spaces and the OSPI calculation.
Special Education Resource Rooms:
Each middle school requires the use of a standard classroom(s) for special education
students requiring instruction to address specific clisabilities.
English as a Second Language Programs:
Each middle school and high school requires the use of a standard classroom for students
leaming English as a second language.
Middle School Computer Labs:
Each middle school has computer labs, except Totem Middle School. Wireless access
has been installed at all secondary schools. Ifadditional classroom space is needed, these
computer labs may be converted to mobile carts.
76
9.c
Packet Pg. 92
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 20I9 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
BUILDING CAPACITIES, continued
High School Career Development and Learning Center (Resource) Room:
Each high school provides special education resource room and carcer development
classrooms for students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities.
PreschoolÆCEAP/Headstart:
Our district currently offers preschool programs for both special needs & typically
developing students at l0 elementary schools. We also have ECEAP and Headstart
program at 10 sites (4 elementary, 1 middle, 3 high schools, and 2 off-site locations).
These programs decrease capacity at those schools. The District has recently opened a
leased space and relocated several programs to this location and to the recently vacated
TAFA portables. This has also allowed us to expand the number of ECEAP programs
offered.
Alternative Learning Experience:
Federal Way offers students the opportunity to participate in an Alternative Learning
Experience through our Internet Academy. These students have never been included in
the capacity calculation of unhoused students.
I1
9.c
Packet Pg. 93
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
ELEMINTARY BUÍLDING
PROGRAIVI CAPACITY
BUILDING CAPACITIES, continued
MIDDLESCHOOL BUILDING
PROGRAMCAPACITY
HICHSC}IOOL BTJILDING
PROGRAMCAPACITY
Notes
* Federal Way Public Acaderny, Career Acadenry at Trulran High School, and Ernployrrent Transition Progrzrn
andTAF@Saghaliefbrthehighschool schoolgradespan(9-12)arenon-boundaryschools. Theseschoolsarenotusedinthe
calculated avelages.
School Name Headcount
Adelaide 3s3
Brioadoon 299
Carnelot 271
Entemrise 34s
G'een C¿bles 401
Lake Dolloff 400
[¿ke Crove 353
t¿keland 171
Mar* Twain 430
Meredith Hill 37s
Min¡r l¡ke
Nautilus (K-8)
262
466
Olvmnic Mew 353
Panther L¿ke 347
Rainier View 405
Sheruood Forest 390
Silver t¿ke 400
Star t¿ke 337
Srrnnvcrcst 405
Twin Lakes 34t
Valhalla 406
Wildwood 372
Woodlnont (K-8)357
TOTAL 8.445
School Nalre Headcount FTE
tllahee 855 864
Kilo 779 781
l¿kota 786 794
Sacaiawea 694 701
Seo uoyah 585 591
Totern 795 803
TAF @ Sachalie 598 604
Fedeml Wav Public Acadelnv r83 185
TOTAI,5.275 5329
* Mirklle School Awraqe 727 735
School Narne Headcount FTE
Decatur 1243 lJ29
Federal Way r 684 1.801
Thor¡as Jellemon t224 t 309
Todd Beamer r 085 l.l 60
TAF â Saphalie 155 l6ó
Career Acade¡nv at Tnlrmn ls9 170
Federal Wav Public Acadernv l16 124
Elnployrrent Trans ition Pro grarn 48 5l
TOTAL 5-714 6.rIt
[lementûrv A\€rage 367 I*High School Alerage
1B
9.c
Packet Pg. 94
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
PORTABLE LOCATIONS
The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic
education. It is not an efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity
for 500 students due to lack of spac e for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout
the year and from year to year.
Portables are used as interim measures to house students when increasing population
impacts a school attendance area. Portables may also be required to house students when
new or changing programs require additional capacity. They also provide housing for
students until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. When permanent
facilities become available, the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage
or child care programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some
portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the
District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables.
The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for
educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools.
I9
9.c
Packet Pg. 95
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PLTBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
PORTABLE LOCATIONS' Continued
PORTABLES LOCATED
AT F,I-ENTE\TARY S CHOO LS
PORTABLES LOCATED
,A,T NiIIDDLESCHOOLS
PORTABLES LOCATU)
AT HICHSCHOOLS
INSTRUCTIONAL
NON
INSTRUCTIONAL
Decatur I I
Federal Wav
Thornas Jefferson l0
Todd Bearner I
't'(-)'t'AL 26 I
PORTABLES LOCATÐ
AT SUPPORT FACILITIES
MOT
TDC 9
Fonner TAFA ll
TOTAL 20
DISTRICT PORTABLES IN USE FOR ECEAP
AND/OR TART
¡NSTRUCTIONAL
NON
INSIRUCfIONAL
Adelaide I ,
Brisadoon I
Cauælot I
Entemrise 3
Geen Gables
I¿ke Dolloff 2
l¿ke C¡rove 2
[¿keland
MalkTwain 3
Meredith Hill 3
Minor l¿ke l0 t
Nautilus
Olvrnpic View 2
Panther [¿ke 4
RainielMew 5
Sherwood Forest 4
Silver l¿ke 4
Star L¿ke 3 I
Sunnycrest 6
Twin l¿kes -t
Valhalla 4
Wildwood 4
Woodrnont 3
TOT,A.L 67 l2
Sherwood Forest ,
Totern ,
Total 4
INSIRUCfIONAL
NON
INSTRUCTIONAL
IIIahee ,l
Kilo I 6
t¿kota
Sacaiawea 5
Seouovah t
Totern 4
TAF@ Sashalie 4
TOTAL l8 7
20
9.c
Packet Pg. 96
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 20I9 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
STUDENT FORECAST
Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development.
Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget
preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the
forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are
also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue
projections are directly related to enrollment projections.
Enrollment projections are completed arurually in the Business Services Department.
Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals, grade
level and program level to include vocational and special education students.
The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis
of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time.
In a stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses
historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This
method does not trace individual students; it is concemed with aggregate numbers in each
grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted
factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out ofthe school system are
commoq student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases
survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The
district collects information on birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats
these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years.
The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting
student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below.
The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These
are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of
years of historical information and how they are weighted.
A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that
allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these
projections for the district level. The En¡ollment MasterrM software provides statistical
methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of
these methods. This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment.
In February 2018, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the
Federal Way School District. The report was complete in March 2018. The model used
to forecast next year's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade
growth, assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county-wide
average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migration.
This forecast was provided as a range of three projections. The long-range forecast
provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based
on projected changes in the 5-19 age group for King County. Most of the methods used
for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of
2I
9.c
Packet Pg. 97
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PT.IRT,TC SCHOOT.S 20I9 CAPTTAT. FACTT,ITTES PT,AN
STUDENT FOR-ECAST' continued
something else (e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend fbr
the school-age population over time. The report included 5 different calculations to
provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2025. This model
produces a projection that is between 21,500 and 25,000 when applied to the low,
medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning
and is consistent with estimates from various models.
Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the
cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther
out the projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections
are studied annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional
clemographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range
projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student
populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the
State of Washington.
Near term projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by current
local economic conditions. The District tracks new development from five permitting
jurisdictions. Long range planning assumes a student yield from proposed new housing
consistent with historical growth patterns.
Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The
Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions
comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school
district community in the future.
aa
9.c
Packet Pg. 98
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2OI9 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
STUDENT FORECAST, continued
Headcount Enrollment History and Projections
(Excludes Full-Time Running Start)
S chool Ye¿r Ele M¡ddlêCalendâr Yr
2013
2014
201 5
20t6
2017
201 8
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2012-13
2013-14
2014-1 5
2015-16
2016-t7
2017-18
820 I 8-t I
P20t9-20
n020-2t
P202t-22
P2022-23
P2023-24
P2024-25
Totà¡ K-12
HC
21.562
2 1.808
2l .7 54
2l .995
2l .933
21.915
2l,9 t 7
22,t 85
22,243
22,347
22,489
22,713
22,967
Percenl
I.I%
9.731 5.014 6.817
I 0.1 42 4.84s ó.82 I
9.998 4.93 I 6.825
10.20ó 5.094 6.695
10.424 5,031 6.476
10.418 5.159 6.338
10,292 5,247 6,378
r0,29t 5,470 6,424
10,288 5,462 6,493
10,336 5,357 6,654
10,441 5,259 6,786
r0,s93 s,2s3 6,867
10,796 5,28s 6,886
Elenenttry K-5 MitldleSchool 6-8 High School 9-12
I,I%
-0.3%
-0.r%
0.0%
1.2%
0.3%
0.5%
0.6%
L0%
1. I 0/6
24,000
23,000
22,000
21,000
20,000
19,000
18,000
17,000
16,000
15,000
Enrollment Hisiory and Six Year Forecast
È"\ù,.Ènù,.ù,^qqqqqq)o 2o Þr 2, ), 2e 9" g ou, 'i *B 'g
School Year
¡LlC
23
9.c
Packet Pg. 99
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PLTBLIC SCHOOLS 20I9 CAPITAL FACII,TTIF.S PT,AN
SECTION 4 - KING COUNTY. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY. AND CITY OF
KENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
Capacity Summaries
Site & Construction Costs Allocations
Student Generation Rates
Impact Fee Calculations
Reference to Impact Fee Calculations
24
9.c
Packet Pg. 100
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2OI9 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACITY SUMMARIES
All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and High Schools
The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information, Portable Capacity
information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the
requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use
temporary facilities or interim measures.
The District has recently adjusted its capacity calculation method for Elementary schools
to better show capacity needed to comply with the K-3 Class Size Reduction. This
adjustment is also shown in the portable capacity calculation. In order to allow for
flexibility in portable usage the District will use an average class size calculation of 2l for
each Elementary portable and an average class size of 25 for each Middle and High School
portable.
The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire
District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, middle school,
and high school levels individually.
The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are
in place each year.
25
9.c
Packet Pg. 101
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PI_IBLIC SCHOOLS 20Iq CAPITAT FACIT,TTTF.S PI.AN
CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued
Capacity Summary - All Grades
CAPACITY
m.{ROLLMm{T
Budset -- Proiected--
Calendar Year 20t8 20t9 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
School Year 20t8-19 2019-20 2020-21 202t-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25
BUILDINC PROCRAM
HEADCOUNT CAPACITY
FTECAPACITY
t9,434
19.885
19,434
I 9.88s
19,434
r9,885
19,434
I 9.885
20,005
20,456
20,455
20,922
20,455
)o q))
Add Capacity
Adiusted Prosrarn Headcount Capacitv 1,9.434 t9.434 19.434 20.005 20.4ss 20.455 20,455
Adiusted Prosrarn FTE Capacitv 19.885 19.885 19.885 20.456 20.906 20.922 2Q,922
Bas ic Headcount Enlolllnent
lntemet Acaderny Headcount Enrolhnentl
Basic FTE Enrolhnent without Intemet Academv
2t,9t7
(208)
2t.709
22,185
(208)
21,977
)) )A'l
(208)
22.035
22,347
(208)
22.r39
22,489
(208)
22,28t
)) 1 l'\
(208)
22.s0s
22,967
(208)
22.759
S URPLUS OR (TJI\HOUS FD)
ACTTY
RELOCÄTABLECAPACITY
SURPLUS OR(LINHOUSFD)
PROGRAM AND RELOCATAB LE
CAPACITY 473 205 r23l)236 544 336 82
NOTES:
I Intemet Acaderny students are included in projections but do not require full titne use olscliool fàcilities
Curent Portable Capacity
Add New Porlable Capacity
Subtract Portable Capacity
2,t7 t ') )q'l ) )q7 t,919 t,919 t,9 t9 1,9 t9
Adiusted Portable Caoacilv ) )o1 ) )Q'7 1,9 t9 t,9t9 1.919 1.919 1"919
26
9.c
Packet Pg. 102
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued
Capacity Summary - Elementary Schools
Budget -- Proiected--
Calendar Year 20r 8 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
School Year 2018-r9 2019-20 2020-21 2071-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25
BUILDING PROGRAM
HEAD COUNT CAPACITY
F-IECAPACITY
8A4s
8.445
8.445
8.44s
8,445
8.445
8.44s
8.44s
9,0r6
s.0 r6
o tro
o rro
o )to
q )?o
Add/Subtract capacity total
Aclcl capacity atl
L¿ke Crove
Mirror l¡ke
Stal L¿ke
Wildwood
Adiusted Prograrn Fleadcount Capacitv 8.44s 8.M5 8.445 9.016 9.229 9.229 9.229
Adiusted Pto grarn FTE Capacitv 8.445 8.445 8.445 9.016 9,229 q ))a q ??o
ENROLLMüll'[
Bas io Fleaclcount Enrolhrpnt
Internet Acaderny Heaclcount"
Basic Fleadcount Enrollrrcnt without Intelnet Acaderw 10.277
t0,292
(ls)
10,291
( l5)
t0.276
10,288
(15)
t0.273
10,336
(15)
10.32 l
10,444
( l5)
10.49
10,593
( ls)
10.s78
10,796
( l5)
10.78 I
SURPLUS OR(UNHOUS[I))
PROGRANICAPACITY 11.832)ú.8311 ll -828ì û.30s)ú.200)(1"349)tr.s52ì
RTLOCATABLECAPAC|TY1
s LJRPLUS OR (LrN HOUS !D)
PROGR-A,M AND RE-OC¡\TABLE
CAPACITY (635)(634\ú.009)t486)l38l )t530)(733\
NOTES:
I Capacity increases are pt'ojected based on a design to accornmdate 600 stuclents - as design is corr4rletecl these uny be
adjusted in firttne itetations olthis plan. lncreased capacity ìs currently stated as the dillerence between cunent calculated
capacity and the projeoted design.
2lnternetAcadenrystudentsareincludedinprojectionsbutdonotrequirefulltirneuseofschoolfacilities.
3 Relocatable C'apacity is basecl on the nurrtrel of portables available and othel adrninistrative techniques which
can be used to teuporarily house students until perrrunent fàcilities are available. This is a calculated nurnberonly
The actual nutrùer ofporlables that will be usecl will be based on actual student population needs.
The District rmy begin to pull portables fì'otnthe instructional inventory. Age and condition of the porlables
will detennine fèasibility ttrl continued instructional use.
Cunent Portable Capacity
Acld/Subtract porlable capacity
Add portable capacity at:
Lake Dolloff
Meredith Ftill
Sunnyclest
Subtract portable capacity at:
L¡ke Gove
Minor L¡ke
Star L¿ke
Wildwood
1,071 t.t97 1.191 819 819 819 8t9
Adíusted Potable Caoacitv r.t97 1.197 8t9 819 8t9 819 819
21
9.c
Packet Pg. 103
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PLTBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PI,AN
CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued
Capacity Summary - Middle Schools
ITY
8.{ROLLùI${T
Budset -- Proiected--
Calendar Year 20r 8 201 9 2020 202r 2022 2023 2024
School Year 201 8- t9 20t9-20 2020-2t 202t-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25
BUILDING PROCRAM
HEADCOUNT CAPACITY
FTECAPACITY
< t?<
s.329
5,275
s329
5 ?75
5.329
< )1\
5329
< t7s
5 1r0
\ )75
5.129
5,275
5.329
Add/Subtract capacity
Add capacity at:
Totetnl
Adiusted Prosraln Headcount Capacitv s )'1\5.275 5 t75 \ )1\s t75 5.275 5.215
Adiusted Prosrarn FTE Capacity 5.329 5.329 5.329 s.329 s.329 5.329 5.329
Bas ic Headco unt Enrolln--nt
Intemet Acatleury2
Basic Enrolhnent without lntemet Acadernv
5,247
(47)
5,200
5,470
(41)
5.423
5,462
(47)
5,415
5.357
(47)
s,310
5.259
(47)
s,212
s )51
5.206
(47)
5,285
(4'7)
s.238
SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED)
PROGRAMCAPACITY t29 o4\186)L9 ll7 t23 9t
RELOCATABLECAPACITYT
Cunent Porlable Capacity
Acldi Subtract portable capacity
Totern Middle School
Adiusted Portable Caoacitv
450
450
450
450
450
450
450
450
450
(100)
3s0
350
350
3s0
3s0
SURPLUS OR(LINHOUSF¡)
PROGRAIVI AND Rfl-OCATABLE
CAPACITY s79 356 364 469 461 413 441
NOTES:
I ToternMiddteschoolcumentlyhasacapacitytbr'800studentsandisbeingdesignecltoaccomrrodateacornparable
student population.
2 lnternet Acaclerny students are includecl in projections but do not require ñrll titne use of school facititics.
3 RelocatableCapacityisbasedonthenur¡berofportablesavailableandotheradrninistrativetechniqueswhich
can be used to ternporadly house students until pennanent lacilities are available. This is a calculated nutnber only.
The actual nurnber ofpofiables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs.
The Distrjct uray begin to pull portables liomtlie instnrctional inventory. Age and condition of the portables
wìll detennine fbas ibility for continued ins tructio nal us e.
2B
9.c
Packet Pg. 104
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2OI9 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACITY S UMMARIES' Continued
Capacity Summary - High Schools
CAPACITY
n{ROLLMm{T
Budeet - - Prolected -
Calendar Year 20 t8 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
School Year 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25
BUILDING PROGRAM
HEADCOUNT CAPACITY
FTE CAPACITY
5,714
6.r I I
5,714
6.1 il
5,114
ó.1I I
5,7 t4
6.llt
5,714
6.1 il
5,951
6-164
5,951
63&
Add/Subtract capacity
Tlrornas Jeffenon High Schoola
Adius ted Progmrn Headcount Capacitv 5.7 14 5.-/14 5.7t4 5;il4 5,951 5,95 I 5,951
Adiusted Prograln FTE Capacity ó.llt 6"il1 6.n l 6.1ll 6.3&6,364 639
Basic Headcount Enrolhnent
lntemet Academyl
Basic Ed without Intemet Acadernv
6,378
(t46)
6.232
6,424
(146)
6.278
6,493
(146)
6,347
6,654
(146)
6,508
6,786
(146)
6,U0
6,867
(t46)
6,72t
6,886
( 146)
6"740
s URPLUS OR (TJNHOUS ED)
PROGRAMCAPACITY (121\$67\Q36\ß97\Q76\1357)ß761
RELOCATABLECAPACNY2
Curent Porlable Capacity
Add/Subtract porable capacity
650 650 650 650 650 650 650
Adjusted Ponable Capacity 650 650 650 650 650 650 650
S URPLUS OR (I.JNHO US [D)
PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE
CAPAClTY3 529 483 4t4 253 374 293 274
NOTES:
l. InternetAcadetnystudentsareincludedinprojectionsbutdonotrequirefull tirneuseofschool fàcilities
2 RelocatableCapacityisbasedonthenumberofportablesavailableanclothetadrninistrativeteclrniqueswhich
can be used to telnporarily house students until pennanent lacilities are available. This is a calculated number only
The actual nurnberolportables that will be used will be based on actual student popr.rlation needs.
The District rnay begin to pull porlables fiorn the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the porlables
will detennine fèasibility fbr continued ins tructional us e.
3. Capacity lol unhoused students will be accorrurpdated with traveling teachers and
no planning tirne in sorne classroolm.
4 CurrentprojecttirnelinesestiratethecornpletionofThornasJetlèrsonHSopeninginthelall of2022.
29
9.c
Packet Pg. 105
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
IMPACT FBE CALCULATIONS
Single and Multi-Family Residences
Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees
to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities.
To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was
established. This formula can be found in King County Code 214 and was substantially
adopted by the City of Aubum, Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District
to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be
added to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some
standard construction costs, which are unique to that district.
Impact Fee Calculation
On page 30, the 2018 variables for the calculation of the Impact Fee for single family and
multi-family units based on King County Code 2lA and the Growth Management Act,
generate the results below:
Plan Year 20I B Plan Year 2019
Single Family Units
Multi-Family Units
Mixed-Use Residential I
s6,842
820,086
810,043
s7,221
$19,454
727
Impact Fee Calculation - King County Code 214
The Impact Fees have changed as a result of changes in several factors. The updates made
to the variables in the Impact Fee calculation, generate a change in the Impact Fee between
the 2018 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2019 Capital Facilities Plan. A summary of these
changes can be found on page 32 and a year over year comparison of formula variables can
be found on page 33.
I In accordance with the City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249
30
9.c
Packet Pg. 106
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS' continued
Impact Fee Calculations
School Site Acquisition Cost:
Faciliry Cost /
Acre
Facilitv
Student
Factor
Student
Factor'
SFR
Student
FactoÍ Cost/
MFR
Cost/
MFR
Cost/
MFR
Cost/
MFR
MFR
Cost/
SFR
Cost/
SFR
Elernentary
Middle School
High School
School Construction Cost:
o/o Penn Fac.i Facility Facility
TOTAI,
Student
Factor
MFRTotalFt
Eler.nentary
Middle School
High School
Temporary Facility Cost:
o/o Terrp Fac.Facility Facility
Total Ft Cost
Elernentary
Middle School
High School
State Matching Credt Calculation:
Construction Cost Sq. Ft State
A Ft Student
Elernentary
Middle School
High School
Tax Payment Credit Calculation
Average Assessed Value (March 2018)
Capital Bond Interest Rate (March 2018)
Net Present Value of Average Dwelling
Yeats Atprlized
Prcpefty Taxlevy Rate
Present Value of Rere¡rue Stream
Mitigation Fee Summary
Site Acquisition Cost
Penrnnent Facility Cost
Terrpomry Facility Cost
State Match Credit
Tax Payurent Credit
SubTotal
507n Local Share
lln accordance with the City of Federal Way Or'dinance No. 95-249
2ln accor'dance with the City of Kent Ordinance No.4278
Total
SFR
Single Family Multi-Family MixeGUse
Residences Residences Residentiall
Student
Factor
FR
TOTAI,
Student
Factor Cost/
Cost/
SFR
SFR
TOTAL
Student
Factor
Studsnt
Factor
MFR
$
$
$
$
$
2,862 $
20,408 $
2t$
(5,633) $
(3.214) S
5,781 $
47,388 $
5s$
(13,145) $
(l,l7l) $
5,781
47,388
55
( r3,145)
(l,l7l)
$ t 4,443 $
$ 7,221 $
38,908 $
19,454 $
38,908
t9.454
Calculated lmBct Fee $ 7.221 S t9.454 S 9.727
City of Kent tmpact Fee2 s 7.22r $ 8.386
$0 $0.9,??y
0.1073 SO s00.2701
4.85 $216.718 5l 0.13m 0.2808 $2.8ó2 $5.78 r
s2.862 $s,781
927.134
$0
784$3S,701,150 I
l
$r7.óó1.7r3 I
0.1073 0.270t
$
$0
$920.2s4
$20,408 $47.388
$s5
$0
3.2t%
t88
0.1073
0.1390
t26 0.2244 0.5865 $21
0.2701
0.2808 $0
$21 |tt55
s2.973 s7.771
s0 $0
s225.97
,..._...-_.-ï??1,?L
$225.97
65. I
65.15%0.1
0.5865
.$2.6({l $5.374
$5.633 sl -1.1 45
...$i?7,.q91....
3.8s%
...$J.t?t?.1...
3.8s%
..v,q1,q,7!1..__
l0
$ r.20
__.$97.i,?_qÞ.._.
l0
$ 1.20
$3,214 $ 1.171
31
9.c
Packet Pg. 107
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2OI9 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
REFBRENCES TO IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
SCHOOL ACQUISITION COST
The district purchased the Norman Center to house the Employment Transition Program and
to allow for the expansion of the ECEAP program. The purchase and use of this site
increased our high school permanent capacity by 51 students.
Total Cost
Cost per Acre
$2,100,000 / 2: $1,0500000
81,050,000 / 4.85 : 821 6,718
SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COST
With voter approval of the $450,000,000 bond package, design work is underway for six of
the approved projects. Anticipated construction budgets (based on the Maximum
Allowable Construction Cost or MACC) have been updated to reflect the current
construction market, and capacity has been line-tuned. In addition, a credit for the cost of
new construction is incorporated to recognize the K-3 Class Size Reduction Grant obtained
by Federal Way Public Schools. It is estimated this $23 million grant will be reimbursed in
six equal payments - a portion for each of the six schools serving K-3 students. The
following table outlines the facility cost included in the impact fee calculation:
Two additional projects are within this horizon, but not yet included - Olympic View K-8
and Mark Twain Elementary. These costs will be incorporated into future Capital Facilities
Plans. Current Middle School capacity calculations do not reflect unhoused students, so no
costs associated with lllahee Middle School or Totem Middle School are included.
Consistent with the capacity calculations described earlier, the District uses the OSPI square
footage calculation for determining capacity at our secondary schools. Based on this
methodology, the following construction costs for Thomas Jefferson High School are
allocated as the proportionate share:
Elementary
Schools Lake Grove Mirror Lake Star Lake Wildwood
Elementary
TOTAL
Permanent
Capacity 353 404 387 472 t6t6
New Capacity 600 600 600 600 2400
Increased
Capacity as o/o 48.5o/o
MACC 827,r74,2s0 s27,174,250 s29,854,450 s27.174.250 $ 1 1 1,377,200
Proportionate
Share
$ 54,034,483
K-3 Class Size
Credit
($ 15,333,333)
Net
Proportionate
Share
$ 38,701,150
32
9.c
Packet Pg. 108
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 20I9 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
REFERENCES TO IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS, continued
Square Footage Capacity at 130 sq. ft.
Current: l79,ll9 1378
Planned: 210,000 l6 15
Increased Capacity 237
Increase as o/o 17.24%
MACC $102.443.200
Proportionate Share $ 17.661.713
The District will use the above formulas created as a base for future Capital Facilities Plans
during the life of the current bond authorization. The capacity of these schools may vary
from year to year as programs are added or changed and construction cost may increase over
time.
FACILITIES CAPACITY
Permanent Facility Capacity:
Changes to the Building Program Capacities calculation are found on page 17.
Capacity Summaries:
The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the
capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current
buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found
on pages 25-28.
Student Generation Factor Analysis:
Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined
separately for single-family units and multi-family units. The factors used in
the 2019 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors
from single-family units and multi-family units that were constructed in the
District in the last five (5) years and can be found on the next page
Temporary Facility Cost:
The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or
new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on pages 18 and
t9.
33
9.c
Packet Pg. 109
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
STUDENT GENERATION RATES
New Construction in Prior 5 Years
Single Fanib' Student Generation
Multi-Fauriþ' Student Generation - Cit¡' of Federal Wa¡'
Total
SüJClent
Factor
0 2ô67
0.3334
0 8667
0.2381
0.63ö3
û.40{n
0.4138
0 6755
o.3243
0 5910
o-4707
lligh School
Student
Facbr
0 000û
0 2000
0.008/
0.0667
0.tlsog
û.166/
0 1034
0 2281
0.1081
0 159't
0.1390
Middle School
Student
Factor
û 0667
0 0667
0. r 333
0 0190
0.0909
0 1333
0 m90
0.1 842
0 1081
0.13ô4
0,1073
Elementary
Sù¡dent
Factor
0 2000
0.0667
0 6667
o 1524
o 4545
0.1000
o 2414
o.2632
0 1081
0 2955
o-''244
Number of
High School
Sü¡denb
0
3
1
7
1
5
3
26
4
7
57
Number of
lliddle School
St¡dents
1
1
2
1
4
2
21
4
ô
44
Number of
Elementary
St¡de nts
3
10
16
3
7
30
4
13
92
Number of
S¡ngle Family
Dwellings
1a
13
15
105
tt
30
29
114
37
44
41Ð
DEVELOPMENT
(1 7) Eagle Manor
(17) Lakehaven Estates
(1 7) Hrbbford Glen
(17) Vista Pointe
{16) Jefierson Placê
(1 6) Star Lake East
(1 5) Swan Song
(1 5) Wynstone East
(14) North Lake Rim
{14) Wynstone
Total
Sù¡dent Generation"
Total
Strdent
Factor
0 8669
1 .3194
0.2963
"t 3tìã2
1-1374
High School
Student
Facbr
0 1851
o.2ft8
0.0741
o 4427
0,2808
ll¡ddle School
Student
Fâctor
0 2110
0.2778
0 0741
o 3447
o.2701
Elementary
Sû¡dent
Facbr
0 4708
0.7639
0 1481
0 6177
0.5865
I'lum be r of
High Sehool
St¡de nts
57
60
2
118
23t
Num be r of
Middle School
St¡dents
65
ôo
2
10't
228
Number of
Elementary
Students
145
165
4
181
495
Number of
Mulfi Family
Dwellings
308
216
27
2S3
844
DEVELOPMENT
(1 7) Uptown Square
(17) Kittb Corner
(1 6) Kand¡la Toìrvnhomes
(1 5) Park 16
Total
Strdent Generation"
'Student Generatron rate rs based tn totals
1A
9.c
Packet Pg. 110
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 20I9 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2OI8 TO 2019
Item From/To Comment
Percent of Pennanent Facilities 95.86% to 95.llo/o Report #3 OSPI
Percent Temporary Facilities 4)4% to 4.89o/o Updated portable inventory
Average C ost of Portable
Classroors
C onstruction C ost Allocation
State Match
Average Assessed Vafue
Capital Bond Interest Rate
Properly Tax Ler,y Rate
Student Generation F actors
Single-Family
SFR- 5294,328 to $327,803
MFR- $109,489 to $119,431
5172,993 to $189,188 Updated 5-yr rolling average of
portables purchased and placed
by 2016.
5213.23 to 5225.97 Change effective J,úy 2017
65.59% to 65.150/o Change effective J,úy 2017
Per Puget Sound Educational
Service District (ESD 121)
Elementary
Middle School
High School
3.95% to 3.85%Market Rate
$ l.3l to $1.20
.2200 to .2244
.1202 to .1073
.1429 to .1390
5970 to.5865
2369 to .2701
3228 to .2808
King Corurty Treasury Division
Updated Horsing Inventory
No te : Stu d e n t gene ra t i on fa cto rs þ r a re
single fanily units are based on neu,
developments constrlrcted withín the District
over the lustfve (5) years prior to the date of
the fee calculation.
Stttdent generation factorsþr arc multi-
family units are based on new developments
constntcted within the District over the lust
fve (5) years prior to the dote ofthe fee
cet lcttlation.
SFR based on the updated calculation
MFR based on the updated calculation
SFR based on the updated calculation
MFR maximum per City of Kent Ordinance No. 4278
Multi-Farnily
Elementary
Middle School
High School
Irpact Fee
City ofKent
SFR- 56,842 toS7,22l
MFR- $20,086 ro $19,454
SFR- 56f42to57,221
MFR - $20,086 to $8,386
35
9.c
Packet Pg. 111
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
Each Scholar: A Voice. A Dream. A BRIGHT Future.
In an environment of high expectations, high support, and no
excuses, the staff of Federal Way Public Schools will continually
learn, lead, utilize data, and collaborate to ensure our scholars
have a voice, a dreaffi, ând a bright future.
6lA,C,
THE EARTY YEARS:
BUILDING ÏHE
FOUNDATION lwo WHOTE CHITD:
THRIVIN6,
RESPONSIBIE
CONIIDENf,
rNDtvtDuAts
Êvsry rtudint slìolår will ede.
kandcrqå{cr r@dy to h¿rß with tht $o¡ll
em0tion¿l 5lill9 tlÊt will propcl eåô
ilod$t to neét ü q(e€d gr¡& leval
starúrù i0 tnglieh l¿n9uåge Aß (El¡)
¡[d Maùwâti€ by úe end of ]d gråde
Eq srùdont trhol¿r üll bê
Mp@sed ald prapd€d 10
ddêfop pêeül Ë¡nartility ¡¡
ords b be pG¡tivs produ.livê
mmbss ol $dett,
ACTIVE LËARNERS:
twrte
ENGAGED,
EMPOWERED
CRITICAL
THINKERS
t€y ftdeôt dþh¡ üll b€
eûp@er€d sfth Menltp
of thek ed@tff ðnd be ñlly
s!¡ged ¡û le(mìrg úiliÕl and
oÍôtive thi¡lsr
I GoNTENÏ-AREA
towr:trtrËüåï
I tlery íodflt (holar lr¡r¡
Kth quit¿bh opPonúilY
's:::å*#Iffil
peddmåne ñ âl¡ 3újs bt
tôe 6d ot 6ó gróde.
ntll ¡l," Jåffi',il+,H,:I t v v HrGHscHooLI cRaounrtoNTHRouGlt
succEsSFUt TRANSlll0NS
fuary stodent rhole wilf r((sJfult
üvigþlê úe (r¡ti(¿l lrânr¡tlqtr h ÙteÎ,
st6[ngr dd sll gradu¡ls frm high
st{ol Èãrly fd oü¡gq (aH, ald
po3¡t(ond¡ry dp!ilffq
FEDERAL WAY
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Each Scholar: A voice. A dream. A BRIGHT future.
,
This document is published by the Business Services Department of the Federal Way Public Schools. May 2018
9.c
Packet Pg. 112
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
e
d
W
a
y
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
S
c
h
o
o
l
HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 401
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2018-2023
Board Introduction: June 27, 2018
Adoption: July 18, 2018
9.d
Packet Pg. 113
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
H
i
g
h
l
i
n
e
C
A
P
F
I
P
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
3
_
P
L
A
N
-
D
O
C
_
0
6
-
2
7
-
1
8
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 401
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2018-2023
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Joe Van, President
Bernie Dorsey, Vice President
Angelica Alvarez
Fa’izah Bradford
Tyrone Curry, Sr.
SUPERINTENDENT
Dr. Susan Enfield
9.d
Packet Pg. 114
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
H
i
g
h
l
i
n
e
C
A
P
F
I
P
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
3
_
P
L
A
N
-
D
O
C
_
0
6
-
2
7
-
1
8
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
Table of Contents
Page
Introduction ......................................................................................................................................1
Educational Program Standard ........................................................................................................3
Capital Facilities Inventory ..............................................................................................................5
Student Enrollment Trends and Projections ....................................................................................9
Capital Facilities Projections for Future Needs .............................................................................10
Financing Plan ...............................................................................................................................12
School Impact Fees ........................................................................................................................13
Appendix A: District Map .......................................................................................................... A-1
Appendix B: Population and Enrollment Data ............................................................................B-1
Appendix C: School Impact Fee Calculations .............................................................................C-1
Appendix D: Student Generation Rates ...................................................................................... D-1
For information regarding the Highline School District’s 2018-2023 Capital Facilities Plan,
contact Rodney Sheffer, Interim Executive Director, Capital Planning and Construction,
Highline School District No. 401, 17810 8th Avenue South, Building A, Burien, Washington
98148. Telephone: (206) 631-7500
9.d
Packet Pg. 115
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
H
i
g
h
l
i
n
e
C
A
P
F
I
P
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
3
_
P
L
A
N
-
D
O
C
_
0
6
-
2
7
-
1
8
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
- 1 -
Purpose of the Capital Facilities Plan
This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan has been prepared by the Highline School District (the
“District”) as the District’s primary facility planning document, in compliance with the
requirements of Washington’s Growth Management Act (the “GMA”) and King County Council
Code Title 21A. The Plan was prepared using data available in May 2018. The GMA outlines
13 broad goals including adequate provision of necessary public facilities and services. Schools
are among these necessary facilities and services. School districts have adopted capital facilities
plans to satisfy the requirements of RCW 36.70A.070 and to identify additional school facilities
necessary to meet the educational needs of the growing student populations anticipated in their
districts.
The Highline School District (the “District”) has prepared this Capital Facilities Plan (the
“CFP”) to provide King County (the “County”) and the cities of Burien, Des Moines, Kent,
Normandy Park, SeaTac, and Tukwila with a schedule and financing program for capital
improvements over the next six years (2018-2023).
This Plan will be updated annually with any changes to the impact fee schedule adjusted
accordingly.
Executive Summary
After a period of low enrollment growth, the District has experienced steady enrollment
increases since 2010 and projects continued enrollment increases following a slight dip in 2017.
The District currently serves an approximate student population of 18,983 (October 1, 2017
enrollment) with 18 elementary schools (grades K-6), five middle level schools (grades 7-8), and
five high schools (grades 9-12). In addition, the District has alternative programs: Big Picture
(MS and HS) at the Manhattan site; CHOICE Academy (MS and HS) at the Woodside site; New
Start (9-12) at the Salmon Creek Site; and Puget Sound Skills Center (“PSSC”).
Over the last 14 years the District has embarked on a major capital improvement effort to
enhance its facilities to meet current educational and life-safety standards. Since 2002 the
District has passed three major capital bonds: one in 2002 for approximately $189,000,000, one
in 2006 for approximately $148,000,000, and one in 2016 for approximately $299,850,000. The
2002 and 2006 bonds were used for replacement of existing facilities and not to accommodate
increased enrollment. The 2016 bonds are earmarked for a combination of improvements
to/replacement of existing facilities and the provision of new capacity.
With the approved capital bond funds and reimbursements from the Office of the Superintendent
of Public Instruction, the State of Washington, the Port of Seattle, the Federal Aviation
Administration and private donations for a new Raisbeck Aviation High School , the District has
designed, permitted and constructed 13 new elementary schools, 1 new high school, renovated 3
SECTION ONE: INTRODUCTION
9.d
Packet Pg. 116
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
H
i
g
h
l
i
n
e
C
A
P
F
I
P
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
3
_
P
L
A
N
-
D
O
C
_
0
6
-
2
7
-
1
8
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
- 2 -
schools as interim facilities, and renovated portions of Memorial Field and Camp Waskowitz.
All of this work has been done since March 2002.
The District’s 2016 bond proposal was based on the recommendations of a Capital Facilities
Advisory Committee (“CFAC”), a citizens’ committee representing every part the District. The
committee met for a year to study the District's facilities needs, review data, such as enrollment
projections and building conditions, and analyze various solutions. CFAC developed a long-
term facilities plan, which includes the 2016 bond as the first phase of a four-phase plan to meet
students’ needs over the next 20 years.
As the District looks ahead it recognizes that anticipated enrollment growth, some of which will
be caused by new development, and implementation of recent legislation will require the District
either to add new facilities, add additions to existing facilities, renovate existing facilities, or add
portables to existing facilities.
This CFP identifies the current enrollment, the current capacity of each educational facility, the
projected enrollment over the six-year planning period and how the District plans to
accommodate this growth. It also includes a schedule of impact fees that should be charged to
new development.
Based on current projections, the District needs to add capacity at the elementary and middle
school levels to accommodate projected enrollment and implementation of recent legislation. To
address these needs, the District plans to build a new elementary to replace Des Moines
Elementary School to increase its student capacity, add classrooms at existing elementary
schools, and build one new middle school. In addition, new modular or portables may need to be
added at individual elementary schools and middle schools to accommodate future enrollment.
At this time it has been assumed that additional land will not be needed to accommodate the new
schools; however, land will be necessary in the future to support the District’s long range
facilities plan and the Educational Strategic Plan.
9.d
Packet Pg. 117
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
H
i
g
h
l
i
n
e
C
A
P
F
I
P
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
3
_
P
L
A
N
-
D
O
C
_
0
6
-
2
7
-
1
8
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
- 3 -
King County Code 21A.06 refers to a “Standard of Service” that each school district must
establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. School facility and student capacity needs are
dictated by the types and amounts of space required to accommodate the District’s adopted
educational program. The educational program standards which typically drive facility space
needs include grade configuration, optimum facility size, class size, educational program
offerings, classroom utilization and scheduling requirements, and use of relocatable classrooms
(portables).
District educational program standards may change in the future as a result of changes in the
education program, special programs class sizes, grade span configurations, and use of new
technology, as well as other physical aspects of the school facilities. In addition, the State
Legislature’s implementation of requirements for reduced K-3 class size will also impact school
capacity and educational program standards. (The District currently offers full-day
kindergarten.) The school capacity inventory will be reviewed periodically and adjusted for any
changes to the educational program standards. These changes will also be reflected in future
updates of this CFP.
The Standard of Service outlined below reflects only those programs and educational
opportunities provided to students that directly affect the capacity of school buildings. The
special programs listed below require classroom space, thus the permanent capacity of some
buildings housing these programs has been reduced.
Table 1
Class Size – Standard of Service
Grade Level Average Class Size Based on
Standard of Service
Kindergarten 24*
Grades 1 – 3 25*
Grades 4 – 6 27
Grades 7 – 8 30
Grades 9 – 12 32
*The District standard for K-3 will change to 17:1 in 2019 (see Table 7).
It is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of all regular teaching stations throughout
the day. Therefore, classroom capacity is adjusted using a utilization factor of available
teaching stations depending on the physical characteristics of the facility and educational
program needs.
SECTION 2 – STANDARD OF SERVICE
9.d
Packet Pg. 118
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
H
i
g
h
l
i
n
e
C
A
P
F
I
P
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
3
_
P
L
A
N
-
D
O
C
_
0
6
-
2
7
-
1
8
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
- 4 -
Elementary School Standard of Service Models
Special education for students with disabilities may be provided in self-
contained classrooms.
All students are provided music instruction in a separate classroom.
All students will have scheduled time in a special classroom.
Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in
classrooms designated as follows:
Resource Rooms
English Language Learners (ELL)
Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I)
Gifted Education
Learning Assisted Programs
Severely Behavior Disorder
Transition Rooms
Mild, Moderate, and Severe Disabilities
Developmental Kindergarten
Extended Daycare Programs and Preschool Programs
Secondary School Standard of Service Models
Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in
classrooms designated as follows:
Resource Rooms
English Language Learners (ELL)
Computer Labs
Science Labs
Career and Vocational Rooms
Daycare Programs
Alternative Program Spaces
9.d
Packet Pg. 119
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
H
i
g
h
l
i
n
e
C
A
P
F
I
P
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
3
_
P
L
A
N
-
D
O
C
_
0
6
-
2
7
-
1
8
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
-5-
This section provides an inventory of capital facilities owned and operated by the District
including schools and relocatable classrooms (modulars or portables). School facility capacity
was inventoried based on the space required to accommodate the District’s adopted educational
program standards. See Section Two: Standard of Service. A map showing locations of District
facilities is provided in Appendix A.
Schools
See Section One for a description of the District’s schools and programs.
School capacity was determined based on the number of teaching stations (or general
classrooms) within each building and the space requirements of the District’s currently adopted
current educational program and internal targets as reported in ICOS with the Office of the
Superintendent of Public Instruction. It is this capacity calculation that is used to establish the
District’s baseline capacity, and to determine future capacity needs based on projected student
enrollment. The school capacity inventory is summarized in Tables 2, 3, and 4.
As the District implements reduced K-3 class size requirements and grade reconfiguration, the
inventory will reflect adjustments in the Standard of Service (see Tables 7-B and 7-C).
Relocatable Classrooms (Portables)
Relocatable classrooms (portables) are used as interim classroom space to house stud ents until
funding can be secured to construct permanent classrooms. The District currently uses 27
relocatable classrooms at various school sites throughout the District to provide additional
interim general classroom capacity. A typical relocatable classroom can provide capacity for a
full-size class of students. Current use of relocatable classrooms throughout the District is
summarized in Table 5.
SECTION THREE: CAPITAL FACILITIES INVENTORY
9.d
Packet Pg. 120
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
H
i
g
h
l
i
n
e
C
A
P
F
I
P
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
3
_
P
L
A
N
-
D
O
C
_
0
6
-
2
7
-
1
8
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
-6-
Table 2
Elementary School Level Inventory
Elementary School
Building Area
(sq. ft.)
Teaching
Stations*
Permanent
Capacity**
Beverly Park at Glendale ES 58,145 22 514
Bow Lake ES 76,108 30 666
Cedarhurst ES 68,916 26 619
Des Moines ES 41,766 19 471
Gregory Heights ES 65,978 27 585
Hazel Valley ES 65,346 26 452
Hilltop ES 51,532 24 594
Madrona ES 69,240 25 598
Marvista ES 68,462 27 621
McMicken Heights ES 69,979 25 582
Midway ES 66,096 25 610
Mount View ES 67,783 26 628
North Hill ES 65,665 27 636
Parkside ES 68,857 26 622
Seahurst ES 59,967 27 585
Shorewood ES 60,326 22 483
Southern Heights ES 32,942 15 336
White Center ES 65,654 26 622
TOTAL
1,122,762
445
10,231
* Teaching Station definition: A space designated as a classroom. Other stations include spaces designated for
special education and pull-out programs.
** General classrooms
9.d
Packet Pg. 121
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
H
i
g
h
l
i
n
e
C
A
P
F
I
P
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
3
_
P
L
A
N
-
D
O
C
_
0
6
-
2
7
-
1
8
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
-7-
Table 3
Middle School Level Inventory***
Middle School Building Area
(sq. ft.)
Teaching Stations* Permanent
Capacity**
Cascade MS 90,582 34 986
Chinook MS 87,476 27 783
Pacific MS 73,941 24 696
Sylvester MS 92,617 30 870
Big Picture MS (at Manhattan)^ 2 58
Choice (at Woodside) ^ 2 58
TOTAL
344,616
119
3,451
* Teaching Station Definition: A space designated as a general classroom. Other stations include spaces
designated for special education and pull-out programs.
** General classrooms.
***Does not include alternative programs: CHOICE Academy MS/HS at Woodside site.
^The District anticipates that the Big Picture and Choice programs will be relocated in the 2019 -20 school year
to another District facility or leased space. Inventory adjustments will be reflected in future updates to this
Capital Facilities Plan.
Table 4
High School Level Inventory***
High School
Building Area
(sq. ft.)
Teaching
Stations*
Permanent
Capacity**
Raisbeck Aviation HS 87,934 14 448
Big Picture HS (at Manhattan)^ 29,141 10 320
Evergreen HS 161,456 48 1,536
Highline HS 214,919 59 1,500
Mount Rainier HS 205,159 47 1,504
Tyee HS 143,101 38 1,216
TOTALS
841,710
227
6,524^^
* Teaching Station definition: A space designated as a general classroom. Other stations include spaces
designated for special education and pull-out programs.
** Regular classrooms.
***Does not include alternative programs: CHOICE Academy MS/HS at Woodside site;
New Start HS at Salmon Creek site; and Puget Sound Skills Center.
^ The District anticipates that the Big Picture program will be relocated in the 2019 -20 school year to another
District facility or leased space. Inventory adjustments will be reflected in future updates to this Capital
Facilities Plan.
^^Total capacity at the high school level may be affected as the District makes programmatic changes in its
small school high schools: Tyee HS and Evergreen HS. For example, spaces currently identified as teaching
stations may be needed to serve special programs.
9.d
Packet Pg. 122
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
H
i
g
h
l
i
n
e
C
A
P
F
I
P
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
3
_
P
L
A
N
-
D
O
C
_
0
6
-
2
7
-
1
8
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
-8-
Table 5
Relocatable Classrooms (Portable) Inventory
Elementary School Relocatables** Other*** Interim Capacity
Beverly Park at Glendale 0 2 0
Bow Lake 0 4 0
Cedarhurst 1 3 25
Des Moines 0 1 0
Gregory Heights 0 0 0
Hazel Valley 3 1 75
Hilltop 5 1 125
Madrona 2 0 50
Marvista 2 0 50
McMicken Heights 0 0 0
Midway 4 0 100
Mount View 4 0 100
North Hill 0 0 0
Parkside 0 0 0
Seahurst 2 2 50
Shorewood 1 3 25
Southern Heights 2 1 50
White Center 1 3 25
TOTAL 27 21 675
Middle School Relocatables** Other *** Interim Capacity
Cascade 0 3 0
Chinook 5 1 145
Pacific 4 0 116
Sylvester 2 2 58
Big Picture MS 4 7 116
TOTAL 15 13 435
High School Relocatable** Other*** Interim Capacity
Raisbeck Aviation HS 0 0 0
Big Picture HS 0 0 0
Evergreen HS 3 2 96
Highline HS 0 0 0
Mount Rainier HS 0 0 0
Tyee HS 0 1 0
TOTALS 3 3 96
**Used for regular classroom capacity.
***The relocatables referenced under “other relocatables” are used for special pull-out programs, storage,
community use, etc.
9.d
Packet Pg. 123
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
H
i
g
h
l
i
n
e
C
A
P
F
I
P
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
3
_
P
L
A
N
-
D
O
C
_
0
6
-
2
7
-
1
8
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
-9-
Generally, enrollment projections using historical calculations are most accurate for the initial
years of the forecast period. Moving further into the future, more assumptions about economic
conditions, land use, and demographic trends in the area affect the projection. Monitoring birth
rates in the County and population growth for the area are essential yearly activities in the
ongoing management of the CFP. In the event that enrollment growth slows, plans for new
facilities can be delayed. It is much more difficult, however, to initiate new projects or expedite
projects in the event enrollment growth exceeds the projections.
With the assistance of a professional demographer, the District has developed its own
methodology for forecasting future enrollments. This methodology, a modified cohort survival
method, considers a variety of factors to evaluate the potential student population growth for the
years 2018 through 2023. These factors include: projected births, projected growth in the K-12
population, and a model which considers growth in population and housing within the District’s
boundaries. The methodology also considers the potential impacts on enrollment due to the
recent opening of a charter school within the District’s boundaries. Certain assumptions are made
regarding the continued enrollment at the charter school. Therefore, the methodology and the
resulting projections should be considered conservative.
District enrollment has increased in recent years, including a 5.87% increase since 2009. Using
the modified cohort survival projections, a total enrollment of 19,703 students is expected in
2023. In other words, the District projects an increase of 3.79% in student enrollment (or 720
students) between 2017 and 2023. See Appendix B (Enrollment projections from Les Kendrick,
December 2017.)
Table 6
Projected Student Enrollment
2018-2023
Projection
2017*
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Actual
Change
Percent
Change
18,983 18,932 18,941 18,974 19,132 19,436 19,703 720 3.79%
*Actual October 2017 enrollment.
SECTION FOUR: STUDENT ENROLLMENT TRENDS AND PROJECTIONS
9.d
Packet Pg. 124
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
H
i
g
h
l
i
n
e
C
A
P
F
I
P
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
3
_
P
L
A
N
-
D
O
C
_
0
6
-
2
7
-
1
8
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
-10-
Projected future capacity needs, shown in Tables 7-A through 7-C, are derived by applying the
projected number of students to the projected permanent capacity. It is not the District’s policy
to include relocatable classrooms when determining future capital facility needs; therefore,
interim capacity provided by relocatable classrooms is not included in this analysis. The District
will utilize relocatables as necessary to address interim capacity needs. Information on
relocatable classrooms by grade level and interim capacity can be found in Table 5. Information
on planned construction projects can be found in the Financing Plan, Table 8.
Recent state-level policy decisions impact the District’s capacity analysis. Engrossed Senate
House Bill 2261, adopted in 2009, requires school districts to implement full-day kindergarten
by 2018. SHB 2776, passed in 2010, requires school districts to reduce K-3 class sizes to 17
students per teacher. Finally, in November 2014, the voters passed Initiative 1351, which
requires reduced class sizes across all grades (K-12). The District has proactively implemented
full day kindergarten, which reduced the number of available regular classrooms in elementary
schools districtwide.
Table 7 assumes that K-3 class size reduction is implemented by 2019 and that grade levels are
reconfigured to K-5, 6-8, and 9-12 in 2019. All scenarios include the capacity related projects the
District is planning during the six-year planning period.
Future updates to this Plan will incorporate any funded implementation of Initiative 1351.
SECTION FIVE: CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECTIONS FOR FUTURE NEEDS
9.d
Packet Pg. 125
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
H
i
g
h
l
i
n
e
C
A
P
F
I
P
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
3
_
P
L
A
N
-
D
O
C
_
0
6
-
2
7
-
1
8
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
-11-
*Actual October 2017 enrollment
**Does not include portable capacity
^Implementation of reduced K -3 class size and adjusted Standard of Service;
Movement of 6th grade to middle school level.
’’Addition of new classrooms at existing elementary schools and New Des Moines
Elementary School opens at the Zenith site with added capacity
Middle School Level -- Surplus/Deficiency
*Actual October 2017 enrollment
**Does not include portable capacity
^Movement of 6th grade to middle school level
’New middle school capacity added
High School Level -- Surplus/Deficiency
Table 7
Projected Student Capacity – 2018 through 2023
Elementary School Level -- Surplus/Deficiency
2017* 2018 2019^ 2020 2021 2022 2023
Existing Permanent Capacity 10,231 10,231 9,034 9,576 9,576 9,576 9,576
Added Permanent Capacity 0 0 542’’ 0 0 0
Total Permanent Capacity** 10,231 10,231 9,576 9,576 9,576 9,576 9,576
Enrollment 10,583 10,550 9,074 9,131 9,278 9,439 9,625
Surplus (Deficiency)**
Permanent Capacity
(352) (319) 502 445 298 137 (49)
2017* 2018 2019^ 2020 2021 2022 2023
Existing Permanent Capacity 3,451 3,451 3,451 4,401 4,401 4,401 4,401
Added Permanent Capacity 0 0 950’ 0 0 0 0
Total Permanent Capacity** 3,451 3,451 4,401 4,401 4,401 4,401 4,401
Enrollment 2,542 2,644 4,232 4,276 4,255 4,153 4,095
Surplus (Deficiency)**
Permanent Capacity
909 807 169 125 146 248 306
2017* 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Existing Permanent Capacity 6,524 6,524 6,524 6,524 6,524” 6,524 6,524
Added Permanent Capacity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Permanent Capacity** 6,524 6,524 6,524 6,524 6,524 6,524 6,524
Enrollment 5,858 5,738 5,635 5,566 5,599 5,844 5,983
Surplus (Deficiency)**
Permanent Capacity
666 786 889 958 925 680 541
*Actual October 2017 enrollment
**Does not include portable capacity.
”Highline High School re-opens with at current site.
9.d
Packet Pg. 126
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
H
i
g
h
l
i
n
e
C
A
P
F
I
P
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
3
_
P
L
A
N
-
D
O
C
_
0
6
-
2
7
-
1
8
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
-12-
Planned Improvements
The Finance Plan focuses on capacity related projects needed to accommodate recent and
projected growth in the District.
Based upon the scenario presented in Table 3, the District will need to add permanent classroom
capacity at both the elementary school and middle school grade levels. Pursuant to the Board’s
approval of the Capital Facilities Advisory Committee’s final recommendations and the voters’
approval of the 2016 bond, the District will: (1) add space to the new Des Moines Elementary
School (replacement school at the Zenith site); (2) construct new elementary school classrooms
at various sites, and (3) construct a new middle school. All new schools will be located on land
currently owned by the District.
In addition, new relocatable classrooms (portables) may need to be added at individual
elementary schools and middle schools to accommodate future enrollment or to provide interim
classrooms until permanent classroom capacity is built.
The District has identified “non-capacity” capital needs at existing schools including the
replacement of Highline High School and safety/security improvements at various schools.
Financing for Planned Improvements
Funding for planned improvements is typically secured from a number of sources including
voter-approved bonds, State match funds, and impact fees.
General Obligation Bonds: Bonds are typically used to fund construction of new
schools and other capital improvement projects, and require a 60% voter approval. The
District’s voters in November 2016 approved by 66.99% a $299.85 million school construction
bond to fund the projects identified in this Plan.
State School Construction Assistance Program Funds: State School Construction
Assistance funds come from the Common School Construction Fund. The State deposits
revenue from the sale of renewable resources from State school lands set aside by the Enabling
Act of 1889 into the Common School Account. If these sources are insufficient to meet needs,
the Legislature can appropriate General Obligation Bond funds or the Superintendent of Public
Instruction can prioritize projects for funding. School districts may qualify for State School
Construction Assistance funds for specific capital projects based on a prioritization system.
The District received funding in the amount of $6.27 million from Senate Bill 6080 to
address a portion of the classrooms needed for implementation of reduced K-3 class sizes.
SECTION SIX: FINANCING PLAN
9.d
Packet Pg. 127
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
H
i
g
h
l
i
n
e
C
A
P
F
I
P
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
3
_
P
L
A
N
-
D
O
C
_
0
6
-
2
7
-
1
8
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
-13-
Impact Fees: Impact fees are a means of supplementing traditional funding sources for
construction of public facilities needed to accommodate new development. See Section 7 School
Impact Fees.
The District also receives some funding toward school construction from the Port of
Seattle/Federal Aviation Administration. This funding applies to the Des Moines Elementary
Replacement and Addition project and the Highline High School replacement project.
The Six-Year Financing Plan shown on Table 8 demonstrates how the District intends to fund
new construction capacity and improvements to school facilities for the years 2018-2023. The
financing components include bonds, SCAP funds, Port/FAA funds, and impact fees. The
Financing Plan separates projects and portions of projects which add capacity from those which
do not, since the latter are generally not appropriate for impact fee funding.
Table 8
Capital Facilities Financing Plan
(Costs in Millions)**
Project 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total
Cost
Bonds/
Local
Funds
State
Funds
Impact
Fees
Port/FAA
***
Elementary Schools Des Moines Elementary
Replacement and Addition
30.000 27.782 $57.782 X X X X
Elementary School
Classrooms – various sites
3.00 5.00 $8.000 X SB
6080
Funds
X
Middle Schools
New Middle School (950
capacity)
45.70 45.70 $91.401 X X
Portables
Portables at Various Sites .200 .200 .200 X X
High Schools
Highline High School 29.000 29.000 90.409 $148.409 X X X
Land Purchase
(elementary site for future
growth)
$20.000 X X
**All projects are growth-related except Highline High School replacement.
***Construction costs used in impact fee formula are adjusted to recognize Port/FAA funding.
9.d
Packet Pg. 128
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
H
i
g
h
l
i
n
e
C
A
P
F
I
P
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
3
_
P
L
A
N
-
D
O
C
_
0
6
-
2
7
-
1
8
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
-14-
The GMA authorizes jurisdictions to collect impact fees to supplement funding of additional
public facilities needed to accommodate new development. Impact fees cannot be used for the
operation, maintenance, repair, alteration, or replacement of existing capital facilities used to
meet existing service demands.
Impact fees in Appendix C have been calculated utilizing the formula in the King County Code.
The resulting figures are based on the District’s cost per dwelling unit to purchase land for
school sites, make site improvements, construct schools, and purchase/install relocatable
classrooms (portables). As required under the GMA, credits have also been applied in the
formula to account for State Match Funds to be reimbursed to the District and projected future
property taxes to be paid by the dwelling unit.
The District’s cost per dwelling unit is derived by multiplying the cost per student by the
applicable student generation rate per dwelling unit. The student generation rate is the average
number of students generated by each housing type; in this case, single family dwellings and
multi-family dwellings. Multi-family dwellings were broken out into one-bedroom and two-plus
bedroom units. The District has developed its own student generation rate data based on actual
permit data from local jurisdictions. For purposes of the 2018 CFP, the District is using the
student generation rates developed in 2017. See Appendix D.
Using the variables and formula described, and applying the 50% discount rate required by the
King County School Impact Fee Ordinance, impact fees proposed as a part of this CFP, are
summarized in Table 9 below. See also Appendix C.
King County and the City of Kent currently have adopted school impact fee ordinances and
collect school impact fees on behalf of the District. The District has requested that the other
cities that it serves consider adoption of a school impact fee ordinance.
Table 9
School Impact Fees
2018
Housing Type Impact Fee Per Dwelling Unit
Single Family $2,573
Multi-Family $3,646
SECTION SEVEN: SCHOOL IMPACT FEES
9.d
Packet Pg. 129
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
H
i
g
h
l
i
n
e
C
A
P
F
I
P
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
3
_
P
L
A
N
-
D
O
C
_
0
6
-
2
7
-
1
8
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
A-1
APPENDIX A
DISTRICT MAP
9.d
Packet Pg. 130
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
H
i
g
h
l
i
n
e
C
A
P
F
I
P
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
3
_
P
L
A
N
-
D
O
C
_
0
6
-
2
7
-
1
8
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
A-2
9.d
Packet Pg. 131
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
H
i
g
h
l
i
n
e
C
A
P
F
I
P
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
3
_
P
L
A
N
-
D
O
C
_
0
6
-
2
7
-
1
8
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
A-3
9.d
Packet Pg. 132
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
H
i
g
h
l
i
n
e
C
A
P
F
I
P
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
3
_
P
L
A
N
-
D
O
C
_
0
6
-
2
7
-
1
8
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
B-1
APPENDIX B
POPULATION AND ENROLLMENT DATA
9.d
Packet Pg. 133
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
H
i
g
h
l
i
n
e
C
A
P
F
I
P
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
3
_
P
L
A
N
-
D
O
C
_
0
6
-
2
7
-
1
8
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
B-2
9.d
Packet Pg. 134
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
H
i
g
h
l
i
n
e
C
A
P
F
I
P
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
3
_
P
L
A
N
-
D
O
C
_
0
6
-
2
7
-
1
8
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C-1
APPENDIX C
SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
9.d
Packet Pg. 135
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
H
i
g
h
l
i
n
e
C
A
P
F
I
P
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
3
_
P
L
A
N
-
D
O
C
_
0
6
-
2
7
-
1
8
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
C-2
9.d
Packet Pg. 136
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
H
i
g
h
l
i
n
e
C
A
P
F
I
P
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
3
_
P
L
A
N
-
D
O
C
_
0
6
-
2
7
-
1
8
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
D-1
APPENDIX D
STUDENT GENERATION RATE DATA
9.d
Packet Pg. 137
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
H
i
g
h
l
i
n
e
C
A
P
F
I
P
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
3
_
P
L
A
N
-
D
O
C
_
0
6
-
2
7
-
1
8
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
D-2
Highline School District
Student Generation Rates
In 2017, the District developed student generation rates based upon new residential development
occurring within the District’s boundaries within the preceding five year period. The District
compared student enrollment addresses to the addresses on permits for new dwelling units.
Future updates to the Capital Facilities Plan will include updated information.
Single Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years = 382
Elementary School Students occupying Single Family Residences = 58
Elementary Students Single Family Student Generation Rate = .1518
Single Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years = 382
Junior High School Students occupying Single Family Residences = 10
Junior High School Students Single Family Student Generation Rate = .0262
Single Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years = 382
High School Students occupying Single Family Residences = 25
High School Students Single Family Student Generation Rate = .0654
Multi-Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years = 43
Elementary School Students occupying Multi-Family Residences = 4
Elementary Students Multi-Family Student Generation Rate = .0930
Multi-Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years = 43
Junior High School Students occupying Multi-Family Residences = 2
Junior High School Students Multi-Family Student Generation Rate = .0465
Multi-Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years = 43
High School Students occupying Multi-Family Residences = 3
High School Students Multi-Family Student Generation Rate = .0698
9.d
Packet Pg. 138
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
H
i
g
h
l
i
n
e
C
A
P
F
I
P
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
3
_
P
L
A
N
-
D
O
C
_
0
6
-
2
7
-
1
8
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
CAPITAL FACILITIES
PLAN
2018 through 2024
Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors
June 11, 2018
Auburn School District No. 408
9.e
Packet Pg. 139
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
915 Fourth Street NE
Auburn, Washington 98002
Unincorporated King County
City of Auburn
Serving Students in:
Ray Vefik
Robyn Mulenga
Anne Baunach
(253) 931-4900
City of Pacific
City of Algona
City of Kent
City of Black Diamond
Dr. Alan Spicciati, Superintendent
BOARD of DIRECTORS
Ryan Van Quill
Laurie Bishop
9.e
Packet Pg. 140
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Section I Executive Summary ……………………Page 1
Section II Enrollment Projections…………………Page 6
Section III Standard of Service……………………Page 8
Section IV Inventory of Facilities……………………Page 16
Section V Pupil Capacity……………………………Page 20
Section VI Capital Construction Plan………………Page 23
Section VII Impact Fees………………………………Page 27
Section VIII Appendices…………………………..…Page 31
Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Page 32
Appendix A.2 - Capital Facilities Plan Projections Page 45
Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey Page 50
Table of Contents
9.e
Packet Pg. 141
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Auburn School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2018 through 2024
Section I
Executive Summary
9.e
Packet Pg. 142
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2018 through 2024
I. Executive Summary
This six-year Capital Facilities Plan (the “Plan”) has been prepared by the Auburn
School District (the “District”) as the District’s principal planning document, in compliance
with the requirements of Washington’s Growth Management Act and the adopted
ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This Plan was prepared
using data available in the spring of 2018.
This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District.
However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District’s needs. The
District may prepare interim and periodic long-range Capital Facilities Plans consistent
with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period;
other factors and trends in the use of facilities; and other needs of the District as may be
required. However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this six-year Capital
Facilities Plan.
To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and
within the City of Auburn and City of Kent; the King County Council, the City of Auburn
and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction’s
respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of
Algona, Pacific, and Black Diamond, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and
adopt school impact fee ordinances.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act and the local ordinances,
this Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s)
adjusted accordingly.
The Plan establishes the District’s “standard of service” in order to ascertain the District’s
current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction
establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for
the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school
impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the
District’s specific needs. In general, the District’s current standard provides that class
size for grades K-3 should not exceed 17 students and class size for grades 4-5 should
not exceed 25 students. When averaged over the six elementary grades, this computes
to 19.67 students per classroom. Class size for grades 6-12 should not exceed 30
students, with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers. Decisions by current
legislative actions may create the need for additional classrooms. (See Section III for
more specific information.)
The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service
and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The District’s
2017-18 capacity was 14,717. The actual number of individual students was 16,525 as
of October 1, 2017. (See Section V for more specific information.)
9.e
Packet Pg. 143
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
3
The Capital Construction Plan shown in Section VI addresses the additions and
proposed modernization to the District’s existing facilities. The plan includes the
replacement of five elementary schools and one middle school, construction of two new
elementary schools, and acquisition of future school sites to accommodate growth. The
new facilities are required to meet the projected elementary school class size reductions
mandated by the State of Washington and student population increases generated by
the large development areas within the Auburn School District. Three areas that have
significant impact on the school district are the Lakeland South, Lea Hill, and the Auburn
west hill and valley areas of the district. There are other pockets of development that
impact the District as well.
The District completed a comprehensive review of all district facilities in October 2008.
A Steering Committee made recommendations to the Board for capital improvements to
existing facilities and replacement of seven schools over the next ten years. These
recommendations led to a capital improvements levy and a bond issue that was placed
on the ballot in March 2009. Both ballot measures were unsuccessful in March. The
Board determined to rerun only the capital improvements levy in November 2009, which
the voters approved.
In the fall of 2011, the Board determined to move forward with the Auburn High School
Modernization and Reconstruction Project and placed the project before the voters in
February of 2012. The bond issue was supported by the community at nearly 57%
approval rate, but was short of the super majority requirement of 60%. In March of
2012, the Board determined to rerun the bond in November of 2012. In November 2012,
the bond passed at 62%. The project was completed during the summer of 2016.
In the spring of 2016, the Board determined to move forward with the replacement of six
schools and the construction of two new elementary schools. The project was placed
before the voters in November 2016 and the bond passed at 62.83%. The first of the
projects, the replacement of Olympic Middle School, started construction in May 2018.
The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the
City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the
fiscal impacts incurred by a district experiencing growth and development. Section VII
sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multi-family dwelling
units. The student generation factors have been developed using the students who
actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and multi-family
developments constructed in the last five years. There have been dramatic changes in
the student generation factors for single and multi-family in the past five years. The
District plans to carefully monitor the numbers over the next several years to determine if
this is a trend or an anomaly. The method of collecting the data is with the use of GIS
mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County GIS, data from Davis
Demographics and integration of the mapping with student data from the District’s
student data system. This method gives the District actual student generation numbers
for each grade span for identified developments. This data is contained in Appendix A.3.
9.e
Packet Pg. 144
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2018 through 2024
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
4
Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2017 Capital Facilities Plan that
are a part of the 2018 Plan. The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference.
Section I
Executive Summary
A. Updated to reflect new information within the Plan.
B. Summary level list of changes from previous year.
Section II
Enrollment Projections
Updated projections. See Appendices A.1 & A.2.
Section III
Standard of Service
A. Reduction of maximum K-3 class size from between 18.23 and 24 students to 17 students at
elementary schools.
B. Reduction of maximum fourth grade class size from 26 students to 25 students.
C. Reduction of maximum 5th grade class size from 29 students to 25 students.
Section IV
Inventory of Facilities
A. Add 2 portables at Alpac Elementary School.
B. Add 3 portables at Lea Hill Elementary School.
C. Add 1 portable at Terminal Park Elementary School.
D. Add 1 portable at Washington Elementary School.
E. Remove 1 portable from Pioneer Elementary School.
Section V
Pupil Capacity
The six portables to be placed and the one portable to be relocated in August 2018 are
needed to accommodate enrollment increases.
9.e
Packet Pg. 145
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2018 through 2024
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
5
Impact Fees CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2017 to 2018
CPF CPF
2017 2018 EXPLANATION
Student Generation Factors
Single Family Consistent with King County Ordinance 11621,
Elementary 0.1930 0.2340 Student Generation Factors are calculated
Middle School 0.0770 0.0970 by the school district based on district
Sr. High 0.0730 0.1230 records of average actual student generation
Multi-Family rates for new developments constructed
Elementary 0.1030 0.2190 over the last five years.
Middle School 0.0310 0.1070
Sr. High 0.0440 0.1060
School Construction Costs
Elementary $48,500,000 $60,200,000
Site Acquisition Costs
Cost per acre $434,136 $344,240 Updated estimate based on 2.5% annual inflation
Area Cost Allowance Boeckh Index $213.23 $225.97 Updated to projected SPI schedule. (July 2018)
Match % - State 63.29%64.99%Updated to current SPI schedule (May 2017)
Match % - District 36.71%35.01%Computed
District Average AV
Single Family $292,035 $373,974 Updated from March 2018 King County
Dept of Assessments data.
Multi-Family $127,147 $139,135 Updated from March 2018 King County
Dept of Assessments data using average
AV for apartments and condominiums.
Debt Serv Tax Rate $2.65 $2.41 Current Fiscal Year
GO Bond Int Rate 3.95%3.27%Current Rate (Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-14)
Section VIII
Appendices
Appendix A.1 - Updated enrollment projections from October 1, 2017
Appendix A.2 - Updated enrollment projections with anticipated buildout schedule from April 2018
Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey April 2018
DATA ELEMENTS
From new school construction cost estimate in
April 2018.
9.e
Packet Pg. 146
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Auburn School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2018 through 2024
Section II
Enrollment Projections
9.e
Packet Pg. 147
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2018 through 2024
ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS
7
The Auburn School District uses a modified cohort survival model to project future enrollment for all
of the District's operations. Table II.1 is an extract from the comprehensive projection model found in
Appendix A.2 titled "CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections". This Table shows the
anticipated enrollment for the next six years based on the previous six year history of the District under the
assumptions set forth in the comprehensive projections, Appendix A.1, and the projection for additional
students generated from new developments in the district as shown in Appendix A.2.
TABLE ASD ENROLLMENT
II.1 PROJECTIONS (April 2018)
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-2024
GRADE Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected
KDG 1261 1294 1326 1359 1391 1424 1457
1 1276 1320 1353 1386 1418 1451 1483
2 1252 1314 1359 1391 1424 1456 1489
3 1328 1284 1346 1391 1423 1456 1488
4 1329 1355 1311 1373 1418 1450 1483
5 1269 1361 1387 1343 1406 1450 1483
K - 5 7715 7928 8082 8243 8480 8687 8883
6 1207 1268 1360 1386 1342 1405 1449
7 1194 1240 1301 1394 1420 1376 1438
8 1183 1221 1268 1329 1421 1447 1403
6 - 8 3584 3729 3929 4109 4183 4228 4290
9 1258 1357 1395 1442 1503 1595 1621
10 1300 1287 1386 1424 1470 1531 1624
11 1249 1288 1274 1374 1412 1458 1519
12 1419 1347 1386 1372 1472 1510 1556
9 - 12 5226 5279 5441 5612 5857 6094 6320
TOTALS 16,525 16,936 17,452 17,964 18,520 19,009 19,493
GRADES K-12 Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected
K-5 7715 7928 8082 8243 8480 8687 8883
6-8 3584 3729 3929 4109 4183 4228 4290
9-12 5226 5279 5441 5612 5857 6094 6320
K-12 16,525 16,936 17,452 17,964 18,520 19,009 19,493
9.e
Packet Pg. 148
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Auburn School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2018 through 2024
Section III
Standard of Service
9.e
Packet Pg. 149
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2018 through 2024
STANDARD OF SERVICE
9
The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent indicate
that each school district must establish a "Standard of Service" in order to ascertain the overall capacity to house
its projected student population. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage
"capacity" guidelines for computing state funding support. The fundamental purpose of the SPI guidelines
is to provide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching funds for school construction projects. By default
these guidelines have been used to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population. The SPI
guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, facility configurations, emerging
educational reform, or the dynamics of each student's educational program. The Auburn School District Standard
of Service addresses those local considerations that require space in excess of the SPI guidelines. The effect
on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation
pattern. Conditions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without
accompanying computations.
OVERVIEW
The Auburn School District operates fourteen elementary schools housing 7,715 students in grades
K through 5. The four middle schools house 3,884 students in grades 6 through 8. The District operates
three comprehensive senior high schools and one alternative high school, housing 5,226 students in
grades 9 through 12.
CLASS SIZE
The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the
student population. Specialists create additional space needs. Class sizes are subject to collective
bargaining agreements. Changes to class size agreements can have significant impact on available space.
The current pupil/teacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 19.67 students per
teacher. Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 19.67 students per room at grades
K - 5. At grades 6 - 12 the limit is set at 30 pupils per room. The SPI space allocation for each grade
articulation level, less the computed reduction for the Auburn School District Standard of Service,
determines the District's capacity to house projected pupil populations. These reductions are shown
below by grade articulation level.
STRUCTURED LEARNING FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION
The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate to severe
disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses 14 classrooms to provide for 115 students.
The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPI space guidelines. No loss of
capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to
total elementary population.
PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION
The Auburn School District operates an adaptive behavior program for students with behavior
disabilities at the elementary school level. The program uses two classrooms to provide for 22 students.
The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space allocations.
(Two classrooms @ 19.67 - 11 = 8.67)
Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 8.67 each =(17)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 8.67 each =0
Total Capacity Loss =(17)
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
9.e
Packet Pg. 150
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2018 through 2024
STANDARD OF SERVICE
10
SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS
The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special
education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities. Sixteen standard
classrooms are required to house this program. The housing requirements for this program exceed
the SPI space guidelines. Continued loss of capacity is expected as growth in program is larger
than the total elementary population.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 (16-8) rooms @ 19.67 each =(157)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each =0
Total Capacity Loss =(157)
NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM
The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American
students at the elementary level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 19.67 each =(20)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each =0
Total Capacity Loss =(20)
HEAD START
The Auburn School District operates a Head Start program for approximately 114 pre-school aged children
in six sections of 1/2 day in length. The program is housed at three elementary schools and utilizes
three standard elementary classrooms and auxiliary office spaces. The housing requirements for this
program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 19.67 each =(59)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each =0
Total Capacity Loss =(59)
EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION
The Auburn School District operates a pre-school program for young children below age five with
disabilities. This program is housed at eight different elementary schools and currently uses 12
standard classrooms. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI
space guidelines.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 12 rooms @ 19.67 each =(236)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each =0
Total Capacity Loss =(236)
READING LABS
The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional
language arts instruction. These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces if available in
each elementary school. Four elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available, thus
they are housed in a standard classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not
provided for in the SPI space guidelines.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 19.67 each =(79)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each =0
Total Capacity Loss =(79)
9.e
Packet Pg. 151
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2018 through 2024
STANDARD OF SERVICE
11
MUSIC ROOMS
The Auburn School District elementary music programs require one acoustically modified classroom at each
school for music instruction. The housing requirements are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 19.67 each =(275)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each =0
Total Capacity Loss =(275)
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM
The Auburn School District operates pullout programs at the elementary school level for students
learning English as a second language. This program requires 21 standard classrooms that are not
provided for in the SPI space guidelines.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 21 rooms @ 19.67 each =(413)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each =0
Total Capacity Loss =(413)
SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM
The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for eight highly impacted
elementary schools. This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade
level and do not receive other services. This program requires eight standard classrooms that are
not provided for in the SPI space guidelines.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 19.67 each =(157)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each =0
Total Capacity Loss =(157)
ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM
The Auburn School District provides a learning specialist program to increase literacy skills for
first and second graders. This program model was originally created from the I-728 funds and currently
has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms, as well as pulling out students into
designated classrooms. The district is utilizing classrooms at all fourteen elementary schools.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 19.67 each =(275)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each =0
Total Capacity Loss =(275)
EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
The Auburn School District operates an ECEAP program for 132 pre-school aged children in six sections
of half-day length and one full-day program. The program is housed at one elementary school and two
off-site locations and utilizes one standard elementary classroom and three additional classroom spaces
and auxiliary office spaces. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI
space guidelines.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 19.67 each =(79)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each =0
Total Capacity Loss =(79)
9.e
Packet Pg. 152
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2018 through 2024
STANDARD OF SERVICE
12
SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS
The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level.
This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific
disabilities. Eleven classrooms are required at the middle school level to provide for approximately 282 students.
The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the SPI space guidelines.
PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION
The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior
disabilities. The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses two classrooms. One of the
two classrooms for this program are provided for in the SPI space allocations.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 rooms @ 30 each =(30)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0
Total Capacity Loss (30)
STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION
The Auburn School District operates five structured learning classrooms at the middle school level for
students with moderate to severe disabilities and one developmentally disabled classroom for students with
profound disabilities. Two of the five classrooms for this program are provided for in the SPI space allocations.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 30 each =(90)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0
Total Capacity Loss (90)
NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM
The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American
students at the middle school level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 30 each =(30)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0
Total Capacity Loss (30)
MIDDLE SCHOOL COMPUTER LABS
The Auburn School District operates a minimum of one computer lab at each of the four middle schools.
This program utilizes a standard classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided
for in the SPI space guidelines.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each =(120)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0
Total Capacity Loss (120)
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM
The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for English Language
Learner students. This program requires seven standard classrooms that are not provide for in the SPI
space guidelines.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 30 each =(210)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0
Total Capacity Loss (210)
MIDDLE SCHOOLS
9.e
Packet Pg. 153
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2018 through 2024
STANDARD OF SERVICE
13
ROOM UTILIZATION
The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes
elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are
not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available
teaching stations. SPI Report #3 dated 12/14/11 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the
mid-level facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each =(240)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0
Total Capacity Loss (240)
NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM
The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American
students at the high school level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 30 each =(30)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0
Total Capacity Loss (30)
SENIOR HIGH COMPUTER LABS
The Auburn School District operates two computer labs at each of the senior high schools. This
program utilizes two standard classrooms at comprehensive high schools and one at West Auburn.
The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 30 each =(210)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0
Total Capacity Loss (210)
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM
The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at three comprehensive high schools for English
Language Learner students. This program requires five standard classrooms that are not provided
for in the SPI space guidelines.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 30 each =(150)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0
Total Capacity Loss (150)
PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION
The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior
diabilities. The program is housed at one of the high schools and uses two classrooms. The housing
requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space allocations.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 30 each =(60)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0
Total Capacity Loss (60)
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
9.e
Packet Pg. 154
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2018 through 2024
STANDARD OF SERVICE
14
STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM
The Auburn School District operates nine structured learning center classrooms for students with
moderate to severe disabilities. This program is housed at two high schools requiring eight
standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each =(240)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0
Total Capacity Loss (240)
SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS
The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special
education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities. The current
high school program requires 14 classrooms to provide program to meet educational needs of
the students. The SPI space guidelines provide for one of the 14 teaching stations.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 13 rooms @ 30 each =(390)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0
Total Capacity Loss (390)
PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS
Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center. The
SPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity. This space was
not intended for, nor is it usable for, classroom instruction. It was constructed to provide a
community center for the performing arts. Using SPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet
computes to 208 unhoused students or 8.33 classrooms.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 8.33 rooms @ 30 each =(250)
ROOM UTILIZATION
The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous
elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are
not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available
teaching stations. There are 185 teaching stations available in the senior high facilities. The utilization
pattern results in a loss of approximately 10 teaching stations.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 30 each =(300)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0
Total Capacity Loss (300)
9.e
Packet Pg. 155
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2018 through 2024
STANDARD OF SERVICE
15
STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS
ELEMENTARY
Loss of Permanent Capacity (1,768)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0
Total Capacity Loss (1,768)
MIDDLE SCHOOL
Loss of Permanent Capacity (720)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0
Total Capacity Loss (720)
SENIOR HIGH
Loss of Permanent Capacity (1,630)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0
Total Capacity Loss (1,630)
TOTAL
Loss of Permanent Capacity (4,118)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0
Total Capacity Loss (4,118)
9.e
Packet Pg. 156
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Auburn School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2018 through 2024
Section IV
Inventory of Facilities
9.e
Packet Pg. 157
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2018 through 2024
INVENTORY OF FACILITIES
17
Table IV.1 shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OSPI rated capacities.
Table IV.2 shows the number and location of each portable unit by school. The district uses relocatable
facilities to:
1. provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school
populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting,
2. make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique
student needs, and
3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed.
Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on
existing physical plants. Core facilities (i.e. gymnasiums, restrooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc.) are
not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable
classrooms.
District School Facilities
Building Capacity Acres Address
Elementary Schools
Washington Elementary 486 5.40 20 E Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002
Terminal Park Elementary 408 6.70 1101 D Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002
Dick Scobee Elementary 477 10.50 1031 14th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002
Pioneer Elementary 441 8.30 2301 M Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002
Chinook Elementary 440 8.75 3502 Auburn Way South, Auburn WA, 98092
Lea Hill Elementary 450 10.00 30908 124th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092
Gildo Rey Elementary 551 10.00 1005 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002
Evergreen Heights Elem. 456 8.09 5602 South 316th, Auburn WA, 98001
Alpac Elementary 497 10.60 310 Milwaukee Boulevard North, Pacific WA, 98047
Lake View Elementary 559 16.40 16401 Southeast 318th Street, Auburn WA, 98092
Hazelwood Elementary 580 12.67 11815 Southeast 304th Street, Auburn WA, 98092
Ilalko Elementary 585 12.00 301 Oravetz Place Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092
Lakeland Hills Elementary 594 12.00 1020 Evergreen Way SE, Auburn WA, 98092
Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 614 10.00 29205 132nd Street SE, Auburn WA, 98092
ELEMENTARY CAPACITY 7,138
Middle Schools
Cascade Middle School 829 17.30 1015 24th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002
Olympic Middle School 921 17.40 1825 K Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002
Rainier Middle School 843 26.33 30620 116th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092
Mt. Baker Middle School 837 30.88 620 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002
MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3,430
Senior High Schools
West Auburn HS 233 5.10 401 West Main Street, Auburn WA, 98001
Auburn HS 2,100 20.50 711 East Main Street, Auburn WA, 98002
Auburn Riverside HS 1,387 33.00 501 Oravetz Road, Auburn WA, 98092
Auburn Mountainview HS 1,443 40.00 28900 124th Ave SE, Auburn WA, 98092
HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5,164
TOTAL CAPACITY 15,732
Table Permanent Facilities
IV.1 @ OSPI Rated Capacity
(March 2018)
9.e
Packet Pg. 158
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
9.e
Packet Pg. 159
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2018 through 2024
INVENTORY OF FACILITIES
19
TABLE TEMPORARY/RELOCATABLE
IV.2 FACILITIES INVENTORY
(June 2018)
Elementary Location 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025
Washington 6 6 6 6 7 8 8
Terminal Park 7 7 7 7 7 0 0
Dick Scobee 7 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pioneer 6 6 0 0 0 0 0
Chinook 6 6 6 0 0 0 0
Lea Hill 9 9 9 9 0 0 0
Gildo Rey 7 7 8 8 8 9 9
Evergreen Heights 4 4 6 6 6 6 6
Alpac 8 8 8 8 8 9 9
Lake View 2 2 3 3 3 3 3
Hazelwood 2 3 4 4 5 6 6
Ilalko 6 7 7 7 8 9 9
Lakeland Hills Elementary 7 7 7 8 8 8 8
Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 4 5 6 6 6 6 6
TOTAL UNITS 81 77 77 72 66 64 64
TOTAL CAPACITY 1,593 1,515 1,515 1,416 1,298 1,259 1,259
Middle School Location 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025
Cascade 0 0 0 2 4 5 5
Olympic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rainier 5 7 7 8 9 10 10
Mt. Baker 9 10 10 10 11 11 11
TOTAL UNITS 14 17 17 20 24 26 26
TOTAL CAPACITY 420 510 510 600 720 780 780
Sr. High School Location 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025
West Auburn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Auburn High School 0 0 0 1 2 2 2
Auburn High School - *TAP 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Auburn Riverside 13 13 13 13 13 13 13
Auburn Mountainview 4 5 5 6 7 7 7
TOTAL UNITS 18 19 19 21 23 23 23
TOTAL CAPACITY 540 570 570 630 690 690 690
*TAP - Transition Assistance Program for 18-21 year old students with special needs.
COMBINED TOTAL UNITS 113 113 113 113 113 113 113
COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY 2,553 2,595 2,595 2,646 2,708 2,729 2,729
9.e
Packet Pg. 160
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Auburn School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2018 through 2024
Section V
Pupil Capacity
9.e
Packet Pg. 161
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2018 through 2024
PUPIL CAPACITY
21
While the Auburn School District uses the SPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from
which to determine space needs, the District's educational program requires more space than that
provided for under the formula. This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in
Section III, Standard of Service. The District's capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional
space to house its programs. Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new funded
facilities. The combined effect of these adjustments is shown on Line B in Tables V.1 and V.2 below.
Table V.1 shows the Distict's capacity with relocatable units included and Table V.2 without these units.
Table V.1
2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-2025
A.SPI Capacity 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,382 17,032 17,032 17,032
A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 650 650
B.Capacity Adjustments (1,565)(1,523)(1,523)(1,472)(1,410)(1,389)(1,389)
C.Net Capacity 14,167 14,209 14,859 15,560 15,622 15,643 15,643
D.ASD Enrollment 16,937 17,453 17,963 18,520 19,009 19,493 19,963
3/E.ASD Surplus/Deficit (2,770)(3,244)(3,104)(2,960)(3,387)(3,850)(4,320)
CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS
Include Relocatable 2,553 2,595 2,595 2,646 2,708 2,729 2,729
2/Exclude SOS (pg 14)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)
Total Adjustments (1,565)(1,523)(1,523)(1,472)(1,410)(1,389)(1,389)
Table V.2
2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-2025
A.SPI Capacity 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,382 17,032 17,032 17,032
A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 650 650
B.Capacity Adjustments (4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)
C.Net Capacity 11,614 11,614 12,264 12,914 12,914 12,914 12,914
D.ASD Enrollment 16,937 17,453 17,963 18,520 19,009 19,493 19,963
3/E.ASD Surplus/Deficit (5,323)(5,839)(5,699)(5,606)(6,095)(6,579)(7,049)
CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS
2/Exclude SOS (pg 14)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)
Total Adjustments (4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)
1/New facilities shown in 2019-20 through 2023-24 are funded by the 2016 School Bond Issue.
2/The Standard of Service represents 26.18% of SPI capacity. When new facilities are added the Standard
of Service computations are decreased to 24.18% of SPI capacity.
3/Students beyond the capacity are accommodated in other spaces (commons, library, theater, shared teaching space).
Capacity
WITH relocatables
Capacity
WITHOUT relocatables
9.e
Packet Pg. 162
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2018 through 2024
PUPIL CAPACITY
22
A.Elementary Schools
Building 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25
Washington 486 486 486 486 486 486 486
Terminal Park 408 408 408 408 408 408 408
Dick Scobee 477 477 477 477 477 477 477
Pioneer 441 441 441 441 441 441 441
Chinook 440 440 440 440 440 440 440
Lea Hill 450 450 450 450 450 450 450
Gildo Rey 551 551 551 551 551 551 551
Evergreen Heights 456 456 456 456 456 456 456
Alpac 497 497 497 497 497 497 497
Lake View 559 559 559 559 559 559 559
Hazelwood 580 580 580 580 580 580 580
Ilalko 585 585 585 585 585 585 585
Lakeland Hills 594 594 594 594 594 594 594
Arthur Jacobsen 614 614 614 614 614 614 614
Elementary #15 650 650 650 650 650
Elementary #16 650 650 650 650
ELEMENTARY CAPACITY 7,138 7,138 7,788 8,438 8,438 8,438 8,438
B.Middle Schools
Building 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25
Cascade 829 829 829 829 829 829 829
Olympic 921 921 921 921 921 921 921
Rainier 843 843 843 843 843 843 843
Mt. Baker 837 837 837 837 837 837 837
MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430
C.Senior High Schools
Building 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25
West Auburn 233 233 233 233 233 233 233
Auburn 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101
Auburn Riverside 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387
Auburn Mountainview 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443
HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164
COMBINED CAPACITY 15,732 15,732 16,382 17,032 17,032 17,032 17,032
PERMANENT FACILITIES
@ SPI Rated Capacity
(March 2018)
9.e
Packet Pg. 163
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Auburn School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2018 through 2024
Section VI
Capital Construction Plan
9.e
Packet Pg. 164
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2018 through 2024
CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN
24
The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974
with the formation of a community wide citizens committee. The result of this committee's work was
published in the document titled 'Guidelines for Development.' In 1985 the Board formed a second
Ad Hoc citizens committee to further the work of the first and address the needs of the District for
subsequent years. The work of this committee was published in the document titled 'Directions for
the Nineties.' In 1995 the Board commissioned a third Ad Hoc citizens committee to make
recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and physical facilities. The committee
recommendations are published in the document titled 'Education Into The Twenty-First Century - -
A Community Involved.'
The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop plans for the implementation,
funding, and deployment of technology throughout the District's programs. The 1996 Bond
proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate technological
applications. The 1998 Capital Levy provided funding to further deploy technology at a level
sufficient to support program requirements in every classroom and department. In 2005 and 2014,
replacement technology levies were approved to continue to support technology across all facets of
the District’s teaching, learning and operations.
In addition to the technology needs of the District, the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District
must prepare for continued student enrollment growth. As stated in their report, "the District must
pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible." The Ad Hoc recommendation included
commentary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent rates of tax assessments.
A proposition was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that provided $8,000,000 over six years
to address some of the technology needs of the District; and $5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire
school sites.
During the 1997-98 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the
Auburn and Dieringer School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school
population from an area that includes a large development known as Lakeland South. Lakeland
South at that time was immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the Auburn School District.
On June 16, 1998, the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the
Auburn and Dieringer Boards of Directors. On June 22, 1998, the Auburn School Board adopted
Resolution No. 933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District
in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 23, 1998, the Dieringer
School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 24-97-98 authorizing the process to initiate the
adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These
actions resulted in the transfer of an area from Dieringer to Auburn containing most of the Lakeland
South development and certain other undeveloped properties.
Property for the third comprehensive high school was acquired in 1999. The Board placed the
proposition to construction a new high school on the ballot four times. Each election was extremely
close to passing. After the fourth failure a community meeting was held and from that meeting the
Board determined need for further community study.
In April of 2002, the Board formed a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two
items and make recommendations to the Board in the Fall of 2002:
a. A review of the conclusion and recommendations of 1985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees
related to accommodating high school enrollment growth. This included the review of
possible financing plans for new facilities.
b. Develop recommendations for accommodating high school enrollment growth for the next 10
years if a new senior high school is not built.
9.e
Packet Pg. 165
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2018 through 2024
CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN
25
This committee recommended the Board place the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in
February 2003. The February election approved the new high school at 68.71% yes votes. The
school opened in the fall of 2005.
In the fall of 2003, the Board directed the administration to begin the planning and design for
Elementary #13 and Elementary #14. In the fall of 2004, the Board passed Resolution No. 1054 to
place two elementary schools on the ballot in February 2005. The voters approved the ballot
measure in February of 2005 at 64.72%. Lakeland Hills Elementary (Elementary #13) opened in the
fall of 2006. Arthur Jacobsen Elementary (Elementary #14) is located in the Lea Hill area and
opened in the fall of 2007. These two elementary schools were built to accommodate the housing
growth in Lakeland Hills and Lea Hill areas of the school district.
In the 2004-05 school year, the Board convened a sixth Citizen’s Ad Hoc committee to again study
and make recommendations about the future impacts in the District. One of the areas of study was
the need for New Facilities and Modernization. The committee made a number of recommendations
including school size, the need for a new middle school, and to begin a capital improvements
program to modernize or replace facilities based upon criterion.
During the 2005-06 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the
Auburn and Kent School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school
population that will come from an area that includes a number of projected developments in the
north Auburn valley. On May 17, 2006, the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a
joint meeting of the Auburn and Kent Boards of Directors. On June 14, 2006, the Kent School Board
adopted Resolution No. 1225 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of
the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 26, 2006, the
Auburn School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 1073 authorizing the process to initiate
the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation.
These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from the Kent School District to the Auburn School
District effective September 29, 2006.
In October of 2008, after two years of review and study, a Steering Committee made
recommendations to the Board regarding the capital improvements program to modernize or replace
facilities as recommended by the 2004-05 Citizen’s Ad Hoc Committee. These recommendations,
based on specific criteria, led to the Board placing a school improvement bond and capital
improvements levy on the ballot in March 2009. Voters did not approve either measure that would
have updated 24 facilities and replaced three aging schools. The Board decided to place only a six-
year Capital Levy on the ballot in November of 2009, which passed at 55.17%. The levy funded
$46.4 million of needed improvement projects at 24 sites over the following seven school years.
Planning for the replacement of aging schools was started with educational specifications and
schematic design process for the replacement of Auburn High School.
The District acquired a site for a future high school in 2008 and a second site for a future middle
school in 2009. The District also continued efforts to acquire property around Auburn High School.
The Special Education Transition Facility opened in February of 2010. This facility is designed for
students with disabilities that are 18 to 21 years old.
In the November 2012 election, the community supported the $110 million bond issue for the Auburn
High School Modernization and Reconstruction Project at 62%. Construction began in February
2013. The entire new building was occupied by Auburn High School students and staff in the fall of
2015, with site improvements being completed during the 2015-16 school year.
9.e
Packet Pg. 166
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2018 through 2024
CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN
26
In January 2015, a citizen’s ad hoc committee was convened by direction of the Board to address
growth and facilities. The major recommendations were to construct two new elementary schools in
the next four years and to acquire 3 new elementary school sites as soon as possible.
In the November 2016 election, the community supported the $456 million bond issue for the
replacement of six schools and the construction of two new elementary schools at 62.83%.
Construction for the replacement of Olympic Middle School began in May 2018.
Within the six-year period, the District is projecting 3,710 additional students. This increase in
student population along with anticipated class-size reductions, will require the construction of two
new elementary schools and acquiring three new elementary school sites during the six-year
window.
In addition to new and replacement school construction, this District needs to address several major
construction projects to accommodate enrollment growth and continued District use. These projects
include replacement of or improvements to the roof at Auburn Memorial Stadium, boiler replacement
at Auburn Mountainview High School, and energy management system replacement at Auburn
Riverside High School that are funded by Capital Levy dollars.
The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years. The exact
timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population.
2018-24 Capital Construction Plan
(May 2018)
Projected Fund Project Timelines
Project Funded Cost Source 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 24-25
All Facilities -
Technology
2013
Yes $22,000,000 6 Year XX XX
Modernization Cap. Levy
1/ Portables Yes $2,500,000 Impact
Fees XX XX XX XX
1/
Property Purchase -
3 New Elementaries Yes $14,900,000 Bond
Impact Fee XX XX XX XX XX XX
Multiple Facility
Improvements Yes $46,400,000 Capital
Levy XX XX
1/ Elementary #15 Yes $48,500,000 Bond
Impact Fee
XX
plan
XX
const
XX
open
1/ Elementary #16 Yes $48,500,000 Bond
Impact Fee XX
plan
XX
const
XX
open
1/
Replacement of five
Elementary Schools Yes $242,500,000 Bond XX
plan
XX
const
XX
const
XX
const
XX
const
XX
open
1/
Replacement of one
Middle School Yes $78,000,000 Bond XX
const
XX
open
1/ These funds may be secured through a combination of the 2016 Bond Issue, sale of real property, impact fees, and state
matching funds. The District currently is eligible for state matching funds for new construction at the elementary school level and for
modernization at the elementary and middle school levels.
9.e
Packet Pg. 167
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Auburn School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2018 through 2024
Section VII
Impact Fees
9.e
Packet Pg. 168
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2018 through 2024
28
IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION (Spring 2018)
Elementary #15 within 2 year period
Elementary #16 within 3 year period
I. SITE COST PER RESIDENCE
Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Size) x Student Factor
Site Cost/ Facility Student Generation Factor Cost/Cost/
Acreage Acre Capacity Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Family
Elem (K - 5)12 $344,240 650 0.2340 0.2190 $1,487.12 $1,391.79
Middle Sch (6 - 8)25 $0 800 0.0970 0.1070 $0.00 $0.00
Sr High (9 - 12)40 $0 1500 0.1230 0.1060 $0.00 $0.00
$1,487.12 $1,391.79
II. PERMANENT FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCE
Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Size) x Student Factor) x (Permanent to Total Square Footage Percentage)
Facility Facility % Perm Sq Ft/Student Generation Factor Cost/Cost/
Single Family Cost Size Total Sq Ft Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Family
Elem (K - 5)$60,200,000 650 0.9422 0.2340 0.2190 $20,420.40 $19,111.40
Mid Sch (6 - 8)$0 800 0.9422 0.0970 0.1070 $0.00 $0.00
Sr High (9 - 12)$0 1500 0.9422 0.1230 0.1060 $0.00 $0.00
$20,420.40 $19,111.40
III. TEMPORARY FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCE
Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Size) x Student Factor) x (Temporary to Total Square Footage Ratio)
Facility Facility % Temp Sq Ft/Student Generation Factor Cost/Cost/
Single Family Cost Size Total Sq Ft Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Family
Elem (K - 5)$180,000 19.67 0.0578 0.2340 0.2190 $123.67 $115.74
Mid Sch (6 - 8)$180,000 30 0.0578 0.0970 0.1070 $33.61 $37.08
Sr High (9 - 12)$180,000 30 0.0578 0.1230 0.1060 $42.62 $36.73
$199.89 $189.55
IV. STATE MATCH CREDIT PER RESIDENCE
Formula: (Boeckh Index x SPI Footage x District Match x Student Factor)
Boeckh SPI State Cost/Cost/
Index Footage Match Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Family
Elem (K - 5)$225.97 90 64.99%0.2340 0.2190 $3,092.83 $2,894.57
Mid Sch (6 - 8)$0.00 108 64.99%0.0970 0.1070 $0.00 $0.00
Sr High (9 - 12)$0.00 130 64.99%0.1230 0.1060 $0.00 $0.00
$3,092.83 $2,894.58
Student Generation Factor
9.e
Packet Pg. 169
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2018 through 2024
29
V. TAX CREDIT PER RESIDENCE
Formula: Expressed as the present value of an annuity
TC = PV(interest rate,discount period,average assd value x tax rate)
Ave Resid Curr Dbt Serv Bnd Byr Indx Number of Tax Credit Tax Credit
Assd Value Tax Rate Ann Int Rate Years Single Family Multi Family
Single Family $373,974 $2.41 3.27%10 $7,583.22
Multi Family $139,135 $2.41 3.27%10 $2,821.30
VI. DEVELOPER PROVIDED FACILITY CREDIT
Formula: (Value of Site or Facility/Number of dwelling units)
Value No. of Units Facility Credit
Single Family $0.00 1 $0.00
Multi Family $0.00 1 $0.00
FEE PER UNIT IMPACT FEES
RECAP Single Multi
SUMMARY Family Family
Site Costs $1,487.12 $1,391.79
Permanent Facility Const Costs $20,420.40 $19,111.40
Temporary Facility Costs $199.89 $189.55
State Match Credit ($3,092.83)($2,894.58)
Tax Credit ($7,583.22)($2,821.30)
FEE (No Discount)$11,431.36 $14,976.86
FEE (50% Discount)$5,715.68 $7,488.43
Less ASD Discount ($3,000.00)
Facility Credit $0.00 $0.00
Net Fee Obligation $5,715.68 $4,488.43
9.e
Packet Pg. 170
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2018 through 2024
30
SINGLE FAMILY MULTI FAMILY
IMPACT FEE ELEMENTS Elem Mid Sch Sr High Elem Mid Sch Sr High
K - 5 6 - 8 9 - 12 K - 5 6 - 8 9 - 12
Student Factor Single Family - Auburn actual count April 2017 0.234 0.097 0.123 0.219 0.107 0.106
New Fac Capacity 650 800 1500 650 800 1500
New Facility Cost Elementary Cost Estimates April 2017 $60,200,000 $60,200,000
Temp Rm Capacity ASD District Standard of Service.19.67 30 30 19.67 30 30
Grades K - 5 @ 19.67 and 6 - 12 @ 30.
Temp Facility Cost Relocatables, including site work, set up, and furnishing $180,000 $180,000 $180,000 $180,000 $180,000 $180,000
Site Acreage ASD District Standard or SPI Minimum 12 25 40 12 25 40
Site Cost/Acre See below $344,240 $344,240 $344,240 $344,240 $344,240 $344,240
Perm Sq Footage 14 Elementary, 4 Middle, and 4 High Schools 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,695,317
Temp Sq Footage 113 portables at 896 sq. ft. each + TAP 2661 103,909 103,909 103,909 103,909 103,909 103,909
Total Sq Footage Sum of Permanent and Temporary above 1,799,226 1,799,226 1,799,226 1,799,226 1,799,226 1,799,226
% - Perm Facilities Permanent Sq. Footage divided by Total Sq. Footage 94.22%94.22%94.22%94.22%94.22%94.22%
% - Temp Facilities Temporary Sq. Footage divided by Total Sq. Footage 5.78%5.78%5.78%5.78%5.78%5.78%
SPI Sq Ft/Student From SPI Regulations 90 108 130 90 108 130
Boeckh Index From SPI projection for July 2018 $225.97 $225.97 $225.97 $225.97 $225.97 $225.97
Match % - State From OSPI May 2018 64.99%64.99%64.99%64.99%64.99%64.99%
Match % - District Computed 35.01%35.01%35.01%35.01%35.01%35.01%
Dist Aver AV King County Department of Assessments March 2015 $292,035 $292,035 $292,035 $127,147 $127,147 $127,147
Debt Serv Tax Rate Current Fiscal Year $2.41 $2.41 $2.41 $2.41 $2.41 $2.41
G. O Bond Int Rate Current Rate - (Bond Buyer 20 Index March 2017)3.27%3.27%3.27%3.27%3.27%3.27%
Site Cost Projections
Recent Property Purchase Purchase Purchase Adjusted Projected Annual Sites Latest Date Projected
Acquisitions Acreage Year Price Cost/Acre Present Day Inflation Factor Required of Acquisition Cost/Acre
Lakeland 12.00 2002 $2,701,043 $225,087 $334,143 2.50%Elementary 2018 $344,240
Labrador 35.00 2008 $7,601,799 $217,194 $278,027 2.50%Elementary 2018 $344,240
Lakeland East 27.00 2009 $9,092,160 $336,747 $420,550 2.50%Elementary 2022 $379,977
Total 74.00 $19,395,002 $262,095 $344,240
9.e
Packet Pg. 171
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
Auburn School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2018 through 2024
Section VIII
Appendix
Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections
Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections
Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey
9.e
Packet Pg. 172
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections
9.e
Packet Pg. 173
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
1
Auburn School District #408
Student Enrollment Projections
October 2017
Introduction
The projective techniques give some consideration to historical and current data as a basis for
forecasting the future. In addition, the ‘projector’ must make certain assumptions about the operant
variables within the data being used. These assumptions are “judgmental” by definition. Forecasting
can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future, or from the known
to the unknown. The attached tabular data reviews the history of student enrollment, sets out some
quantitative assumptions, and provides projections based on these numerical factors.
The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, psychological, economic,
and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection. The logic embraces
the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today, and will
be in the future. It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over thirteen
years and six years respectively. The results provide a trend, which reflects a long (13-year) and a short
(6-year) base from which to extrapolate.
Two methods of estimating the number of kindergarten students have been used. The first uses the
average increase or decrease over the past 13 and 6-year time frame and adds it to each succeeding
year. The second derives what the average percentage Auburn kindergartners have been of live births
in King County for the past 5 years and uses this to project the subsequent four years.
The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact.
This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic
being used to calculate future projections. Monitoring deviation is critical to the viability and
credibility of the projections derived by these techniques.
Tables
Table 1 – Thirteen Year History of October 1 Enrollments – page 3
The data shown in this table is the baseline information used to project future enrollment. This data
shows the past record of enrollment in the district on October 1 of each year.
Table 2 – Historical Factors Used in Projections - page 4
This table shows the three basic factors derived from the data in Table 1. These factors have been
used in the subsequent projections. The three factors are:
• Factor 1 – Average Pupil Change Between Grade Levels
This factor is sometimes referred to as the “holding power” or “cohort survival.” It is a
measure of the number of pupils gained or lost as they move from one grade level to the
next.
• Factor 2 – Average Pupil Change by Grade Level
This factor is the average change at each grade level over the 13 or 6-year period.
• Factor 3 – Auburn School District Kindergarten Enrollment as a Function of King
County Live Births.
This factor calculates what percent each kindergarten class was of the King County live
births in the five previous years. From this information has been extrapolated the
kindergarten pupils expected for the next four years.
9.e
Packet Pg. 174
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
Table 3 – Projection Models – pages 5-13
This set of tables utilizes the above mentioned variables and generates several projections. The
models are explained briefly below.
Table 3.13 (pg 5) – shows a projection based on the 13-year average gain in kindergarten
(Factor 2) and the 13-year average change between grade levels (Factor 1). The data is
shown for the district as a whole.
Table 3.6 (pg 5) – shows a projection using the same scheme as Table 3.13 except it
shortens the historical data to only the most recent 6 years.
Table 3.13A and 3.6A (pg 6) – uses the same factors above except Factor 3 is substituted
for Factor 2. The kindergarten rates are derived from the King County live births instead
of the average gain.
Tables 3E.13, 3E.6, 3E.13A, 3E.6A (pg 7) – breaks out the K-5 grades from the district
projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade
articulation.
Tables 3MS.13, 3MS.6, 3MS.13A, 3MS.6A (pg 8) – breaks out the 6-8 grades from the
district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by
grade articulation.
Tables 3SH.13, 3SH.6, 3SH.13A, 3SH.6A (pg 9) – breaks out the 9-12 grades from the
district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by
grade articulation.
Table 4 (pg 10) – Collects the four projection models by grade group for ease of
comparison.
Table 5 (pgs 11-13) – shows how well each projection model performed when compared
with actual enrollments. Data is provided in both number and percent formats for the
past 13 years.
Summary
This year is the sixth consecutive year of an increase in enrollment after three consecutive years of
declining enrollment. The increase of 580 students changes our historical average gain/loss in
students. Over the past 6 years the average gain is now 2.37% annually, which equates to an average
annual gain of 360 students.
Using the cohort survival models, the data below is a summary of the range of variation between the
four models. This data can be used for planning for future needs of the district.
The models show changes in the next six years:
Elementary level show increases ranging from 833 to 1,168. (page 7)
Middle School level show increases ranging from 542 to 706. (page 8)
High School level show increases ranging from 855 to 1,094. (page 9)
The models show these changes looking forward thirteen years:
Elementary level show increases ranging from 1,904 to 2,537. (page 7)
Middle School level show increases ranging from 1,110 to 1,444. (page 8)
High School level show increases ranging from 1,485 to 1,995. (page 9)
This data does not factor new developments that are currently under construction or in the planning
stages.
9.e
Packet Pg. 175
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2017
prj17-18 Page 3
TABLE 1 Thirteen Year History of October 1 Enrollments Actual
GRADE 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 GRADE
KDG 955 941 996 998 1032 1010 1029 1098 1170 1232 1198 1237 1261 KDG
1 963 1012 995 1015 1033 1066 1068 1089 1188 1219 1279 1210 1276 1
2 963 1002 1019 1024 998 1016 1097 1083 1124 1196 1289 1300 1252 2
3 1002 1031 997 1048 993 1013 996 1111 1125 1136 1232 1317 1328 3
4 939 1049 1057 1044 1073 1024 1022 1038 1123 1156 1170 1237 1329 4
5 1065 998 1078 1069 1030 1079 1018 1070 1075 1122 1172 1199 1269 5
6 1004 1058 1007 1096 1040 1041 1063 1041 1076 1059 1116 1152 1207 6
7 1028 1014 1057 1034 1125 1060 1032 1086 1072 1091 1099 1132 1194 7
8 1137 1072 1033 1076 1031 1112 1046 1017 1116 1088 1136 1108 1183 8
9 1379 1372 1337 1256 1244 1221 1273 1200 1159 1275 1229 1261 1258 9
10 1383 1400 1368 1341 1277 1238 1170 1278 1229 1169 1316 1248 1300 10
11 1182 1322 1352 1350 1303 1258 1233 1164 1240 1211 1167 1318 1249 11
12 1088 1147 1263 1352 1410 1344 1316 1321 1274 1323 1260 1226 1419 12
TOTALS 14,088 14,418 14,559 14,703 14,589 14,482 14,363 14,596 14,971 15,277 15,663 15,945 16,525
Percent of Gain 2.34%0.98%0.99%(0.78)%(0.73)%(0.82)%1.62%2.57%2.04%2.53%1.80%3.64%
Student Gain 330 141 144 (114)(107)(119)233 375 306 386 282 580
Average % Gain for 1st 6 years.0.33%Average % Gain for last 6 years 2.37%
Average Student Gain for 1st 6 years.46 Average Student Gain for last 6 years 360
Average % Gain for 13 years.1.35%
Average Student Gain for 13 years.203
TABLE 1A Grade Group Combinations 17-18
KDG 955 941 996 998 1032 1010 1029 1098 1170 1232 1198 1237 1261
K,1,2 2881 2955 3010 3037 3063 3092 3194 3270 3482 3647 3766 3747 3789
K - 5 5887 6033 6142 6198 6159 6208 6230 6489 6805 7061 7340 7500 7715
K - 6 6891 7091 7149 7294 7199 7249 7293 7530 7881 8120 8456 8652 8922
1 - 3 2928 3045 3011 3087 3024 3095 3161 3283 3437 3551 3800 3827 3856
1 - 5 4932 5092 5146 5200 5127 5198 5201 5391 5635 5829 6142 6263 6454
1 - 6 5936 6150 6153 6296 6167 6239 6264 6432 6711 6888 7258 7415 7661
6 - 8 3169 3144 3097 3206 3196 3213 3141 3144 3264 3238 3351 3392 3584
7 - 8 2165 2086 2090 2110 2156 2172 2078 2103 2188 2179 2235 2240 2377
7 - 9 3544 3458 3427 3366 3400 3393 3351 3303 3347 3454 3464 3501 3635
9 - 12 5032 5241 5320 5299 5234 5061 4992 4963 4902 4978 4972 5053 5226
10 - 12 3653 3869 3983 4043 3990 3840 3719 3763 3743 3703 3743 3792 3968
9.e
Packet Pg. 176
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2017
prj17-18 Page 4
Factor Average Student Change Between Factor
1 Grade Levels 3
CALENDAR
YEAR
TOTAL
LIVE
BIRTHS
2/3 RD
BIRTHS
1/3RD
BIRTHS
YEAR OF
ENROLL
ADJ
LIVE
BIRTHS
KDG
ENROLL
1979 16,524 11,016 5,508 1985-86 16,708 792 4.740%
K to 1 46.17 K to 1 59.40 1980 16,800 11,200 5,600 1986-87 17,955 829 4.617%
1 to 2 21.92 1 to 2 38.20 1981 17,100 11,400 5,700 1987-88 18,241 769 4.216%
2 to 3 18.00 2 to 3 32.00 1982 18,811 12,541 6,270 1988-89 18,626 817 4.386%
3 to 4 26.75 3 to 4 27.20 1983 18,533 12,355 6,178 1989-90 18,827 871 4.626%
4 to 5 20.58 4 to 5 32.20 1984 18,974 12,649 6,325 1990-91 19,510 858 4.398%
5 to 6 (1.58)5 to 6 (1.00)1985 19,778 13,185 6,593 1991-92 19,893 909 4.569%
6 to 7 20.25 6 to 7 33.40 1986 19,951 13,301 6,650 1992-93 21,852 920 4.210%
7 to 8 15.67 7 to 8 27.20 1987 22,803 15,202 7,601 1993-94 21,624 930 4.301%
8 to 9 176.08 8 to 9 174.20 1988 21,034 14,023 7,011 1994-95 24,062 927 3.853%
9 to 10 10.67 9 to 10 28.60 1989 25,576 17,051 8,525 1995-96 26,358 954 3.619%
10 to 11 (20.83)10 to 11 (12.20)1990 26,749 17,833 8,916 1996-97 24,116 963 3.993%
11 to 12 46.25 11 to 12 98.00 1991 22,799 15,199 7,600 1997-98 20,973 978 4.663%
total 379.92 total 537.20 1992 20,060 13,373 6,687 1998-99 21,573 854 3.959%
1993 22,330 14,887 7,443 1999-00 22,129 849 3.837%
Factor Average Student Change By 1994 22,029 14,686 7,343 2000-01 24,013 912 3.798%
2 Grade Level 1995 25,005 16,670 8,335 2001-02 22,717 846 3.724%
1996 21,573 14,382 7,191 2002-03 21,622 905 4.186%
1997 21,646 14,431 7,215 2003-04 22,023 922 4.186%
K 25.50 K 32.60 1998 22,212 14,808 7,404 2004-05 22,075 892 4.041%
1 26.08 1 37.40 1999 22,007 14,671 7,336 2005-06 22,327 955 4.277%
2 24.08 2 33.80 2000 22,487 14,991 7,496 2006-07 22,014 941 4.274%
3 27.17 3 43.40 2001 21,778 14,519 7,259 2007-08 21,835 996 4.562%
4 32.50 4 58.20 2002 21,863 14,575 7,288 2008-09 22,242 998 4.487%
5 17.00 5 39.80 2003 22,431 14,954 7,477 2009-10 22,726 1032 4.541%
6 16.92 6 33.20 2004 22,874 15,249 7,625 2010-11 22,745 1010 4.441%
7 13.83 7 21.60 2005 22,680 15,120 7,560 2011-12 23,723 1029 4.338%
8 3.83 8 33.20 2006 24,244 16,163 8,081 2012-13 24,683 1098 4.448%
9 (10.08)9 11.60 2007 24,902 16,601 8,301 2013-14 25,094 1162 4.631%Last 5
10 (6.92)10 4.40 2008 25,190 16,793 8,397 2014-15 25,101 1232 4.908%year
11 5.58 11 17.00 2009 25,057 16,705 8,352 2015-16 24,695 1198 4.851%Average
12 27.58 12 19.60 2010 24,514 16,343 8,171 2016-17 24,591 1237 5.030%4.897%
2011 24,630 16,420 8,210 2017-18 24,898 1261 Actual 5.065%
2012 25,032 16,688 8,344 2018-19 24,951 1222 <--Prjctd
2013 24,910 16,607 8,303 2019-20 25,202 1234 <--Prjctd
2014 25,348 16,899 8,449 2020-21 25,441 1246 <--Prjctd
2015 25,487 16,991 8,496 2021-22 25,836 1265 <--Prjctd
2016 26,011 17,341 8,670 2022-23 *number from DOH
Source: Center for Health Statistics, Washington State Department of Health
Factor 2 is the average change in grade level size.
13 YEAR BASE 6 YEAR BASE
TABLE 2 Factors Used in Projections
13 YEAR BASE 6 YEAR BASE
Factor 1 is the average gain or loss of students as they move
from one grade level to the next. Factor 1 uses the past 12 or
6 years of changes.
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT KINDERGARTEN ENROLLMENTS AS A FUNCTION OF KING
COUNTY BIRTH RATES
AUBURN KINDERGARTEN
ENROLLMENT AS A % OF
ADJUSTED LIVE BIRTHS
9.e
Packet Pg. 177
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2017
prj17-18 Page 5
TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS
3.13 Based on 13 Year History
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
KDG 1261 1287 1312 1338 1363 1389 1414 1440 1465 1491 1516 1542 1567 1593
1 1276 1307 1333 1358 1384 1409 1435 1460 1486 1511 1537 1562 1588 1613
2 1252 1298 1329 1355 1380 1406 1431 1457 1482 1508 1533 1559 1584 1610
3 1328 1270 1316 1347 1373 1398 1424 1449 1475 1500 1526 1551 1577 1602
4 1329 1355 1297 1343 1374 1399 1425 1450 1476 1501 1527 1552 1578 1603
5 1269 1350 1375 1317 1363 1394 1420 1445 1471 1496 1522 1547 1573 1598
6 1207 1267 1348 1374 1316 1362 1393 1418 1444 1469 1495 1520 1546 1571
7 1194 1227 1288 1368 1394 1336 1382 1413 1439 1464 1490 1515 1541 1566
8 1183 1210 1243 1303 1384 1410 1352 1398 1429 1454 1480 1505 1531 1556
9 1258 1359 1386 1419 1479 1560 1586 1528 1574 1605 1630 1656 1681 1707
10 1300 1269 1370 1396 1430 1490 1571 1596 1538 1584 1616 1641 1667 1692
11 1249 1279 1248 1349 1376 1409 1469 1550 1576 1518 1564 1595 1620 1646
12 1419 1295 1325 1294 1395 1422 1455 1516 1596 1622 1564 1610 1641 1666
TOTALS 16,525 16,772 17,169 17,561 18,010 18,383 18,755 19,120 19,449 19,723 19,997 20,355 20,692 21,024
Percent of Gain 1.50%2.36%2.28%2.56%2.07%2.02%1.94%1.72%1.41%1.39%1.79%1.66%1.60%
Student Gain 247 397 392 449 373 372 364 329 274 274 358 337 332
TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS
3.6 Based on 6 Year History
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
KDG 1261 1294 1326 1359 1391 1424 1457 1489 1522 1554 1587 1620 1652 1685
1 1276 1320 1353 1386 1418 1451 1483 1516 1549 1581 1614 1646 1679 1712
2 1252 1314 1359 1391 1424 1456 1489 1522 1554 1587 1619 1652 1685 1717
3 1328 1284 1346 1391 1423 1456 1488 1521 1554 1586 1619 1651 1684 1717
4 1329 1355 1311 1373 1418 1450 1483 1516 1548 1581 1613 1646 1679 1711
5 1269 1361 1387 1343 1406 1450 1483 1515 1548 1580 1613 1646 1678 1711
6 1207 1268 1360 1386 1342 1405 1449 1482 1514 1547 1579 1612 1645 1677
7 1194 1240 1301 1394 1420 1376 1438 1482 1515 1548 1580 1613 1645 1678
8 1183 1221 1268 1329 1421 1447 1403 1465 1510 1542 1575 1607 1640 1673
9 1258 1357 1395 1442 1503 1595 1621 1577 1639 1684 1716 1749 1782 1814
10 1300 1287 1386 1424 1470 1531 1624 1650 1606 1668 1712 1745 1778 1810
11 1249 1288 1274 1374 1412 1458 1519 1611 1638 1594 1656 1700 1733 1765
12 1419 1347 1386 1372 1472 1510 1556 1617 1709 1736 1692 1754 1798 1831
TOTALS 16,525 16,937 17,453 17,963 18,520 19,009 19,493 19,963 20,405 20,787 21,176 21,641 22,077 22,501
Percent of Gain 2.49%3.05%2.92%3.10%2.64%2.55%2.41%2.21%1.87%1.87%2.20%2.01%1.92%
Student Gain 412 516 510 556 490 484 470 442 382 389 465 436 424
GRADE
GRADE
9.e
Packet Pg. 178
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2017
prj17-18 Page 6
TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS
3.13A Based on Birth Rates & 13 Year History
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
K 1261 1222 1234 1246 1265
1 1276 1307 1268 1280 1292 1311
2 1252 1298 1329 1290 1302 1314 1333
3 1328 1270 1316 1347 1308 1320 1332 1351
4 1329 1355 1297 1343 1374 1335 1347 1359 1378
5 1269 1350 1375 1317 1363 1394 1355 1368 1379 1399
6 1207 1267 1348 1374 1316 1362 1393 1354 1366 1378 1397
7 1194 1227 1288 1368 1394 1336 1382 1413 1374 1386 1398 1417
8 1183 1210 1243 1303 1384 1410 1352 1398 1429 1390 1402 1414 1433
9 1258 1359 1386 1419 1479 1560 1586 1528 1574 1605 1566 1578 1590 1609
10 1300 1269 1370 1396 1430 1490 1571 1596 1538 1584 1616 1576 1589 1600
11 1249 1279 1248 1349 1376 1409 1469 1550 1576 1518 1564 1595 1555 1568
12 1419 1295 1325 1294 1395 1422 1455 1516 1596 1622 1564 1610 1641 1602
TOTALS 16,525 16,708 17,027 17,327 17,678
Percent of Gain 1.11%1.91%1.76%2.03%
Student Gain 183 319 300 351
TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS
3.6A Based on Birth Rates & 6 Year History
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
KDG 1261 1222 1234 1246 1265
1 1276 1320 1281 1294 1305 1325
2 1252 1314 1359 1319 1332 1343 1363
3 1328 1284 1346 1391 1351 1364 1375 1395
4 1329 1355 1311 1373 1418 1379 1391 1403 1422
5 1269 1361 1387 1343 1406 1450 1411 1423 1435 1454
6 1207 1268 1360 1386 1342 1405 1449 1410 1422 1434 1453
7 1194 1240 1301 1394 1420 1376 1438 1482 1443 1456 1467 1487
8 1183 1221 1268 1329 1421 1447 1403 1465 1510 1470 1483 1494 1514
9 1258 1357 1395 1442 1503 1595 1621 1577 1639 1684 1645 1657 1669 1688
10 1300 1287 1386 1424 1470 1531 1624 1650 1606 1668 1712 1673 1686 1697
11 1249 1288 1274 1374 1412 1458 1519 1611 1638 1594 1656 1700 1661 1673
12 1419 1347 1386 1372 1472 1510 1556 1617 1709 1736 1692 1754 1798 1759
TOTALS 16,525 16,865 17,289 17,687 18,117
Percent of Gain 2.06%2.52%2.30%2.43%
Student Gain 340 424 397 430
GRADE
GRADE
9.e
Packet Pg. 179
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2017
prj17-18 Page 7
TABLE 3E.13 K-5 PROJECTIONS - Based on 13 Year History
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
KDG 1261 1287 1312 1338 1363 1389 1414 1440 1465 1491 1516 1542 1567 1593
1 1276 1307 1333 1358 1384 1409 1435 1460 1486 1511 1537 1562 1588 1613
2 1252 1298 1329 1355 1380 1406 1431 1457 1482 1508 1533 1559 1584 1610
3 1328 1270 1316 1347 1373 1398 1424 1449 1475 1500 1526 1551 1577 1602
4 1329 1355 1297 1343 1374 1399 1425 1450 1476 1501 1527 1552 1578 1603
5 1269 1350 1375 1317 1363 1394 1420 1445 1471 1496 1522 1547 1573 1598 6 year 13 year
K - 5 TOT 7715 7866 7962 8057 8236 8395 8548 8701 8854 9007 9160 9313 9466 9619 833 1904
Percent of Gain 1.96%1.22%1.20%2.22%1.93%1.82%1.79%1.76%1.73%1.70%1.67%1.64%1.62%
Student Gain 151 96 96 179 159 153 153 153 153 153 153 153 153
TABLE 3E.6 K-5 PROJECTIONS - Based on 6 Year History
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
KDG 1261 1294 1326 1359 1391 1424 1457 1489 1522 1554 1587 1620 1652 1685
1 1276 1320 1353 1386 1418 1451 1483 1516 1549 1581 1614 1646 1679 1712
2 1252 1314 1359 1391 1424 1456 1489 1522 1554 1587 1619 1652 1685 1717
3 1328 1284 1346 1391 1423 1456 1488 1521 1554 1586 1619 1651 1684 1717
4 1329 1355 1311 1373 1418 1450 1483 1516 1548 1581 1613 1646 1679 1711
5 1269 1361 1387 1343 1406 1450 1483 1515 1548 1580 1613 1646 1678 1711 6 year 13 year
K - 5 TOT 7715 7929 8083 8243 8480 8687 8883 9079 9274 9470 9665 9861 10057 10252 1168 2537
Percent of Gain 2.77%1.94%1.98%2.88%2.45%2.25%2.20%2.15%2.11%2.07%2.02%1.98%1.94%
Student Gain 214 154 160 237 207 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196
TABLE 3E.13A K-5 PROJECTIONS - Based on Birth Rates and 13 Year History
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
K 1261 1222 1234 1246 1265
1 1276 1307 1268 1280 1292 1311
2 1252 1298 1329 1290 1302 1314 1333
3 1328 1270 1316 1347 1308 1320 1332 1351
4 1329 1355 1297 1343 1374 1335 1347 1359 1378
5 1269 1350 1375 1317 1363 1394 1355 1368 1379 1399 4 year
K - 5 TOT 7715 7801 7819 7823 7904 189
Percent of Gain 1.12%0.23%0.05%1.04%
Student Gain 86 18 4 81
TABLE 3E.6A K-5 PROJECTIONS - Based on Birth Rates and 6 Year History
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
KDG 1261 1222 1234 1246 1265
1 1276 1320 1281 1294 1305 1325
2 1252 1314 1359 1319 1332 1343 1363
3 1328 1284 1346 1391 1351 1364 1375 1395
4 1329 1355 1311 1373 1418 1379 1391 1403 1422
5 1269 1361 1387 1343 1406 1450 1411 1423 1435 1454 4 year
K - 5 TOT 7715 7857 7919 7966 8077 362
Percent of Gain 1.84%0.79%0.60%1.39%
Student Gain 142 62 47 111
GRADE
GRADE
GRADE
GRADE
9.e
Packet Pg. 180
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2017
prj17-18 Page 8
TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS
3MS.13 Based on 13 Year History
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
6 1207 1267 1348 1374 1316 1362 1393 1418 1444 1469 1495 1520 1546 1571
7 1194 1227 1288 1368 1394 1336 1382 1413 1439 1464 1490 1515 1541 1566
8 1183 1210 1243 1303 1384 1410 1352 1398 1429 1454 1480 1505 1531 1556 6 year 13 year
6 - 8 TOT 3584 3704 3879 4045 4094 4107 4126 4229 4311 4388 4464 4541 4617 4694 542 1110
Percent of Gain 3.36%4.70%4.30%1.19%0.33%0.46%2.49%1.94%1.77%1.74%1.71%1.68%1.66%
Student Gain 120 174 167 48 14 19 103 82 77 77 77 77 77
TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS
3MS.6 Based on 6 Year History
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
6 1207 1268 1360 1386 1342 1405 1449 1482 1514 1547 1579 1612 1645 1677
7 1194 1240 1301 1394 1420 1376 1438 1482 1515 1548 1580 1613 1645 1678
8 1183 1221 1268 1329 1421 1447 1403 1465 1510 1542 1575 1607 1640 1673 6 year 13 year
6 - 8 TOT 3584 3730 3929 4109 4183 4227 4290 4429 4539 4637 4734 4832 4930 5028 706 1444
Percent of Gain 4.06%5.35%4.57%1.81%1.06%1.48%3.24%2.47%2.15%2.11%2.07%2.02%1.98%
Student Gain 146 200 179 74 44 63 139 110 98 98 98 98 98
TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS
3MS.13A Based on Birth Rates & 13 Year History
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
6 1207 1267 1348 1374 1316 1362 1393 1354 1366 1378 1397
7 1194 1227 1288 1368 1394 1336 1382 1413 1374 1386 1398 1417
8 1183 1210 1243 1303 1384 1410 1352 1398 1429 1390 1402 1414 1433 6 year 10 year
6 - 8 TOT 3584 3704 3879 4045 4094 4107 4126 4164 4169 4153 4197 542 613
Percent of Gain 3.36%4.70%4.30%1.19%0.33%0.46%0.92%0.10%(0.36)%1.04%
Student Gain 120 174 167 48 14 19 38 4 (15)43
TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS
3MS.6A Based on Birth Rates & 6 Year History
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
6 1207 1268 1360 1386 1342 1405 1449 1410 1422 1434 1453
7 1194 1240 1301 1394 1420 1376 1438 1482 1443 1456 1467 1487
8 1183 1221 1268 1329 1421 1447 1403 1465 1510 1470 1483 1494 1514 6 year 10 year
6 - 8 TOT 3584 3730 3929 4109 4183 4227 4290 4357 4375 4360 4403 706 819
Percent of Gain 4.06%5.35%4.57%1.81%1.06%1.48%1.57%0.40%(0.35)%0.99%
Student Gain 146 200 179 74 44 63 67 18 (15)43
GRADE
GRADE
GRADE
GRADE
9.e
Packet Pg. 181
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2017
prj17-18 Page 9
TABLE HIGH SCHOOL PROJECTIONS
3HS.13 Based on 13 Year History
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
9 1258 1359 1386 1419 1479 1560 1586 1528 1574 1605 1630 1656 1681 1707
10 1300 1269 1370 1396 1430 1490 1571 1596 1538 1584 1616 1641 1667 1692
11 1249 1279 1248 1349 1376 1409 1469 1550 1576 1518 1564 1595 1620 1646
12 1419 1295 1325 1294 1395 1422 1455 1516 1596 1622 1564 1610 1641 1666 6 year 13 year
9-12 TOT 5226 5202 5329 5458 5680 5881 6081 6190 6284 6329 6373 6501 6609 6711 855 1485
Percent of Gain (0.46)%2.43%2.43%4.06%3.54%3.40%1.79%1.52%0.71%0.70%2.01%1.66%1.54%
Student Gain (24)127 130 221 201 200 109 94 45 45 128 108 102
TABLE HIGH SCHOOL PROJECTIONS
3HS.6 Based on 6 Year History
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
9 1258 1357 1395 1442 1503 1595 1621 1577 1639 1684 1716 1749 1782 1814
10 1300 1287 1386 1424 1470 1531 1624 1650 1606 1668 1712 1745 1778 1810
11 1249 1288 1274 1374 1412 1458 1519 1611 1638 1594 1656 1700 1733 1765
12 1419 1347 1386 1372 1472 1510 1556 1617 1709 1736 1692 1754 1798 1831 6 year 13 year
9-12 TOT 5226 5279 5441 5612 5857 6094 6320 6456 6592 6681 6776 6948 7090 7221 1094 1995
Percent of Gain 1.01%3.08%3.13%4.36%4.06%3.71%2.14%2.12%1.35%1.42%2.54%2.05%1.84%
Student Gain 53 163 170 245 238 226 135 137 89 95 172 142 130
TABLE HIGH SCHOOL PROJECTIONS
3HS.13A Based on Birth Rates & 13 Year History
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
9 1258 1359 1386 1419 1479 1560 1586 1528 1574 1605 1566 1578 1590 1609
10 1300 1269 1370 1396 1430 1490 1571 1596 1538 1584 1616 1576 1589 1600
11 1249 1279 1248 1349 1376 1409 1469 1550 1576 1518 1564 1595 1555 1568
12 1419 1295 1325 1294 1395 1422 1455 1516 1596 1622 1564 1610 1641 1602 6 year 13 year
9-12 TOT 5226 5202 5329 5458 5680 5881 6081 6190 6284 6329 6308 6359 6375 6379 855 1153
Percent of Gain (0.46)%2.43%2.43%4.06%3.54%3.40%1.79%1.52%0.71%(0.32)%0.80%0.25%0.07%
Student Gain (24)127 130 221 201 200 109 94 45 (20)50 16 4
TABLE SR. HIGH PROJECTIONS
3SH.6A Based on Birth Rates & 6 Year History
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
9 1258 1357 1395 1442 1503 1595 1621 1577 1639 1684 1645 1657 1669 1688
10 1300 1287 1386 1424 1470 1531 1624 1650 1606 1668 1712 1673 1686 1697
11 1249 1288 1274 1374 1412 1458 1519 1611 1638 1594 1656 1700 1661 1673
12 1419 1347 1386 1372 1472 1510 1556 1617 1709 1736 1692 1754 1798 1759 6 year 13 year
9-12 TOT 5226 5279 5441 5612 5857 6094 6320 6456 6592 6681 6704 6784 6813 6818 1094 1592
Percent of Gain 1.01%3.08%3.13%4.36%4.06%3.71%2.14%2.12%1.35%0.35%1.19%0.43%0.06%
Student Gain 53 163 170 245 238 226 135 137 89 23 80 29 4
GRADE
GRADE
GRADE
GRADE
9.e
Packet Pg. 182
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2017
prj17-18 Page 10
TABLE PROJECTION COMPARISONS
4 BY GRADE GROUP
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 6 year 13 year
E.13 1261 1287 1312 1338 1363 1389 1414 1440 1465 1491 1516 1542 1567 1593 153 332
E.6 1261 1294 1326 1359 1391 1424 1457 1489 1522 1554 1587 1620 1652 1685 196 424
E.13A 1261 1222 1234 1246 1265
E.6A 1261 1222 1234 1246 1265
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 6 year 13 year
E.13 6454 6579 6650 6720 6873 7007 7134 7262 7389 7517 7644 7772 7899 8027 680 1573
E.6 6454 6635 6756 6884 7089 7263 7426 7589 7752 7915 8078 8241 8404 8567 972 2113
E.13A 6454 6579 6585 6577 6639
E.6A 6454 6635 6685 6720 6812
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 6 year 13 year
MS.13 3584 3704 3879 4045 4094 4107 4126 4229 4311 4388 4464 4541 4617 4694 542 1110
MS.6 3584 3730 3929 4109 4183 4227 4290 4429 4539 4637 4734 4832 4930 5028 706 1444
MS.13A 3584 3704 3879 4045 4094 4107 4126 4164 4169 4153 4197 542
MS.6A 3584 3730 3929 4109 4183 4227 4290 4357 4375 4360 4403 706
GRADES ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
9-12 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 6 year 13 year
HS.13 5226 5202 5329 5458 5680 5881 6081 6190 6284 6329 6373 6501 6609 6711 855 1485
HS.6 5226 5279 5441 5612 5857 6094 6320 6456 6592 6681 6776 6948 7090 7221 1094 1995
HS.13A 5226 5202 5329 5458 5680 5881 6081 6190 6284 6329 6308 6359 6375 6379 855 1153
HS.6A 5226 5279 5441 5612 5857 6094 6320 6456 6592 6681 6704 6784 6813 6818 1094 1592
DISTRICT TOTALS
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 6 year 13 year
3.13 16,525 16,772 17,169 17,561 18,010 18,383 18,755 19,120 19,449 19,723 19,997 20,355 20,692 21,024 2230 4499
3.6 16,525 16,937 17,453 17,963 18,520 19,009 19,493 19,963 20,405 20,787 21,176 21,641 22,077 22,501 2968 5976
3.13A 16,525 16,708 17,027 17,327 17,678
3.6A 16,525 16,865 17,289 17,687 18,117
K-12
KNDG
GRADES 1-5
GRADES 6-8
9.e
Packet Pg. 183
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2017
prj17-18 Page 11
TABLE
5
Total =October 1 Actual Count AND Projected Counts Prj 3.13 -13 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase
Diff =Number Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase
% =Percent Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates
Prj 3.6A - 6 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates
Grades 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
K - 5 Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %
ACTUAL 5774 xxx xxx 5735 xxx xxx 5887 xxx xxx 6033 xxx xxx 6159 xxx xxx
Prj 3E.13 5655 (119)(2.06)%5761 26 0.45%5750 (137)(2.33)%5871 (162)(2.69)%6085 (74)(1.20)%
Prj 3E.6 5662 (112)(1.94)%5821 86 1.50%5795 (92)(1.56)%5921 (112)(1.86)%6138 (21)(0.34)%
Prj 3E.13A 5605 (169)(2.93)%5709 (26)(0.45)%5750 (137)(2.33)%5869 (164)(2.72)%6059 (100)(1.62)%
Prj 3E.6A 5631 (143)(2.48)%5756 21 0.37%5784 (103)(1.75)%5912 (121)(2.01)%6094 (65)(1.06)%
Grades 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
6 - 8 Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %
ACTUAL 3169 xxx xxx 3144 xxx xxx 3097 xxx xxx 3206 xxx xxx 3196 xxx xxx
Prj 3MS.13 3185 (80)0.50%3214 70 2.23%3295 198 6.39%3131 (75)(2.34)%3107 (89)(2.78)%
Prj 3MS.6 3192 (75)0.73%3216 72 2.29%3311 214 6.91%3146 (60)(1.87)%3116 (80)(2.50)%
Prj 3MS.13A 3185 (80)0.50%3214 70 2.23%3295 198 6.39%3131 (75)(2.34)%3107 (89)(2.78)%
Prj 3MS.6A 3192 (75)0.73%3216 72 2.29%3311 214 6.91%3146 (60)(1.87)%3116 (80)(2.50)%
Grades 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
9 - 12 Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %
ACTUAL 5032 xxx xxx 5241 xxx xxx 5320 xxx xxx 5299 xxx xxx 5234 xxx xxx
Prj 3SH.13 4577 (455)(9.04)%4630 (611)(11.66)%4783 (537)(10.09)%5085 (214)(4.04)%5190 (44)(0.84)%
Prj 3SH.6 4594 (438)(8.70)%4639 (602)(11.49)%4769 (551)(10.36)%5086 (213)(4.02)%5192 (42)(0.80)%
Prj 3SH.13A 4577 (455)(9.04)%4630 (611)(11.66)%4783 (537)(10.09)%5085 (214)(4.04)%5190 (44)(0.84)%
Prj 3SH.6A 4594 (438)(8.70)%4639 (602)(11.49)%4769 (551)(10.36)%5086 (213)(4.02)%5192 (42)(0.80)%
All 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Grades Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %
ACTUAL 13,975 xxx xxx 14,120 xxx xxx 14,304 xxx xxx 14,538 xxx xxx 14,589 xxx xxx
Prj 3.13 13,417 (558)(3.99)%13,605 (515)(3.65)%13,828 (476)(3.33)%14,087 (451)(3.10)%14,382 (207)(1.42)%
Prj 3.6 13,448 (527)(3.77)%13,676 (444)(3.14)%13,875 (429)(3.00)%14,153 (385)(2.65)%14,446 (143)(0.98)%
Prj 3.13A 13,367 (608)(4.35)%13,553 (567)(4.02)%13,828 (476)(3.33)%14,085 (453)(3.12)%14,356 (233)(1.60)%
Prj 3.6A 13,417 (558)(3.99)%13,611 (509)(3.60)%13,864 (440)(3.08)%14,144 (394)(2.71)%14,402 (187)(1.28)%
PROJECTION COMPARISONS
BY GRADE GROUP
9.e
Packet Pg. 184
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2017
prj17-18 Page 12
TABLE
5
Total =October 1 Actual Count AND Projected Counts Prj 3.13 -13 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase
Diff =Number Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase
% =Percent Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates
Prj 3.6A - 6 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates
Grades 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
K - 5 Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %
ACTUAL 6208 xxx xxx 6230 xxx xxx 6489 xxx xxx 6805 xxx xxx 7061 xxx xxx
Prj 3E.13 6179 (29)(0.47)%6254 24 0.39%6282 (207)(3.19)%6275 (530)(7.79)%6372 (689)(9.76)%
Prj 3E.6 6237 29 0.47%6294 64 1.03%6323 (166)(2.56)%6267 (538)(7.91)%6368 (693)(9.81)%
Prj 3E.13A 6129 (79)(1.27)%6237 7 0.11%6252 (237)(3.65)%6266 (539)(7.92)%6346 (715)(10.13)%
Prj 3E.6A 6172 (36)(0.58)%6264 34 0.55%6269 (220)(3.39)%6260 (545)(8.01)%6339 (722)(10.23)%
Grades 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
6 - 8 Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %
ACTUAL 3213 xxx xxx 3141 xxx xxx 3144 xxx xxx 3264 xxx xxx 3238 xxx xxx
Prj 3MS.13 3179 (34)(1.06)%3242 101 3.22%3234 90 2.86%3221 (43)(1.32)%3143 (95)(2.93)%
Prj 3MS.6 3195 (18)(0.56)%3243 102 3.25%3236 92 2.93%3211 (53)(1.62)%3132 (106)(3.27)%
Prj 3MS.13A 3179 (34)(1.06)%3242 101 3.22%3234 90 2.86%3221 (43)(1.32)%3143 (95)(2.93)%
Prj 3MS.6A 3195 (18)(0.56)%3243 102 3.25%3236 92 2.93%3211 (53)(1.62)%3132 (106)(3.27)%
Grades 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
9 - 12 Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %
ACTUAL 5061 xxx xxx 4992 xxx xxx 4963 xxx xxx 4902 xxx xxx 4978 xxx xxx
Prj 3SH.13 5129 68 1.34%5074 82 1.64%4921 (42)(0.85)%4901 (1)(0.02)%4813 (165)(3.31)%
Prj 3SH.6 5155 94 1.86%5128 136 2.72%5027 64 1.29%5017 115 2.35%4906 (72)(1.45)%
Prj 3SH.13A 5129 68 1.34%5074 82 1.64%4921 (42)(0.85)%4901 (1)(0.02)%4813 (165)(3.31)%
Prj 3SH.6A 5155 94 1.86%5129 137 2.74%5027 64 1.29%5017 115 2.35%4906 (72)(1.45)%
All 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Grades Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %
ACTUAL 14,482 xxx xxx 13,672 xxx xxx 14,596 xxx xxx 14,971 xxx xxx 15,277 xxx xxx
Prj 3.13 13,499 (173)(6.79)%14,570 898 6.57%14,437 (159)(1.09)%14,397 (574)(3.83)%14,328 (949)(6.21)%
Prj 3.6 13,542 (130)(6.49)%14,665 993 7.26%14,586 (10)(0.07)%14,495 (476)(3.18)%14,406 (871)(5.70)%
Prj 3.13A 13,447 (225)(7.15)%14,553 881 6.44%14,407 (189)(1.29)%14,388 (583)(3.89)%14,302 (975)(6.38)%
Prj 3.6A 13,510 (162)(6.71)%14,636 964 7.05%14,532 (64)(0.44)%14,488 (483)(3.23)%14,377 (900)(5.89)%
BY GRADE GROUP (Continued)
PROJECTION COMPARISONS
9.e
Packet Pg. 185
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2017
prj17-18 Page 13
TABLE
5
Total =October 1 Actual Count AND Projected Counts Prj 3.13 -13 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase
Diff =Number Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase
% =Percent Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates
Prj 3.6A - 6 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates
Grades 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Average Average Historical Data is grouped by
K - 5 Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Diff %K - 5, 6-8, 9-12 articulation
ACTUAL 7340 xxx xxx 7500 xxx xxx 7715 xxx xxx xxx xxx pattern.
Prj 3E.13 6659 (681)(9.28)%7052 (448)(5.97)%7329 (386)-5.00%(255)(3.76)%
Prj 3E.6 6632 (708)(9.65)%7046 (454)(6.05)%7317 (398)-5.16%(232)(3.37)%Articulation pattern has no
Prj 3E.13A 6643 (697)(9.50)%6979 (521)(6.95)%7194 (521)-6.75%(292)(4.32)%numeric impact on efficacy
Prj 3E.6A 6611 (729)(9.93)%6966 (534)(7.12)%7169 (546)-7.08%(278)(4.05)%of projection models.
Grades 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Average Average
6 - 8 Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Diff %
ACTUAL 3351 xxx xxx 3392 xxx xxx 3584 xxx xxx xxx xxx
Prj 3MS.13 3230 (121)(3.61)%3256 (136)(4.01)%3307 (277)-7.73%(38)(0.81)%
Prj 3MS.6 3213 (138)(4.12)%3246 (146)(4.30)%3287 (297)-8.29%(38)(0.80)%
Prj 3MS.13A 3230 (121)(3.61)%3256 (136)(4.01)%3307 (277)-7.73%(38)(0.81)%
Prj 3MS.6A 3213 (138)(4.12)%3246 (146)(4.30)%3287 (297)-8.29%(38)(0.80)%
Grades 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Average Average
9 - 12 Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Diff %
ACTUAL 4972 xxx xxx 5053 xxx xxx 5226 xxx xxx xxx xxx
Prj 3SH.13 4773 (199)(4.00)%4874 (179)(3.54)%4896 (330)-6.31%(202)(3.90)%
Prj 3SH.6 4856 (116)(2.33)%4956 (97)(1.92)%4959 (267)-5.11%(153)(2.92)%
Prj 3SH.13A 4773 (199)(4.00)%4874 (179)(3.54)%4896 (330)-6.31%(202)(3.90)%
Prj 3SH.6A 4856 (116)(2.33)%4956 (97)(1.92)%4959 (267)-5.11%(153)(2.92)%
All 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Average Average
Grades Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Diff %
ACTUAL 15,663 xxx xxx 15,945 xxx xxx 16525 xxx xxx xxx xxx
Prj 3.13 14,662 (1,001)(6.39)%15,182 (763)(4.79)%15531 (994)-6.02%(456)(3.39)%
Prj 3.6 14,701 (962)(6.14)%15,248 (697)(4.37)%15563 (962)-5.82%(388)(2.93)%
Prj 3.13A 14,646 (1,017)(6.49)%15,109 (836)(5.24)%15396 (1129)-6.83%(493)(3.63)%
Prj 3.6A 14,680 (983)(6.28)%15,168 (777)(4.87)%15415 (1110)-6.72%(431)(3.21)%
PROJECTION COMPARISONS
BY GRADE GROUP (Continued)
9.e
Packet Pg. 186
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Enrollment Projections
9.e
Packet Pg. 187
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-April 2018
46
BASE DATA - BUILDOUT SCHEDULE Student Generation Factors
ASSUMPTIONS:Single Multi-
1 Uses Build Out estimates received from developers. 2018 SF 2018 MF Family Family
2 Student Generation Factors are updated Auburn data for 2018 as allowed per King County Ordinance Elementary 0.2340 0.2190
3 Takes area labeled Lakeland and Kersey Projects projects across 2018-2024 Middle School 0.0970 0.1070
4 Takes area labeled Bridges and other Lea Hill area developments and projects across 2018-2024 Senior High 0.1230 0.1060
5 Includes known developments in N. Auburn and other non-Lea Hill and non-Lakeland developments Total 0.4540 0.4320
Table Auburn S.D.
1 Development 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total
Lakeland/Kersey Single Family 50 150 100 23 0 0 323
Lea Hill Area Single Family 75 60 30 22 0 0 0 187
Other Single Family Units 40 100 170 180 170 120 100 880
Total Single Family Units 165 310 300 225 170 120 100 1390
Projected Pupils:
K-5 39 73 70 53 40 28 23 325
6-8 16 30 29 22 16 12 10 135
9-12 20 38 37 28 21 15 12 171
K-12 75 141 136 102 77 54 45 631
Multi Family Units 200 120 35 8 0 0 0 363
Total Multi Family Units 200 120 35 8 0 0 0 363
Projected Pupils:
K-5 44 26 8 2 0 0 0 79
6-8 21 13 4 1 0 0 0 39
9-12 21 13 4 1 0 0 0 38
K-12 86 52 15 3 0 0 0 157
Total Housing Units 365 430 335 233 170 120 100 1753
K-5 82 99 78 54 40 28 23 405
6-8 37 43 33 23 16 12 10 174
9-12 41 51 41 29 21 15 12 209
K-12 161 193 151 106 77 54 45 788
Cumulative Projection 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25
82 181 259 313 353 381 405
37 80 113 136 152 164 174
41 92 133 161 182 197 209
161 354 505 611 688 742 788
Total
Total
Sr. High Pupils
Elementary - Grades K -5
Mid School - Grades 6 - 8
Senior High - Grades 9 - 12
Total
Auburn Factors
Elementary Pupils
Mid School Pupils
Sr. High Pupils
Elementary Pupils
Total
Mid School Pupils
Sr. High Pupils
Elementary Pupils
Mid School Pupils
9.e
Packet Pg. 188
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-April 2018
47
TABLE New Projects - Annual New Pupils Added & Distributed
2 by Grade Level
6 Year Percent of average
GRADE Average Pupils by Grade 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2024-25 2025-26
Enroll.& Level
KDG 1199 7.74%1261 12 27 39 47 53 57 61
1 1210 7.81%1276 13 28 39 48 54 58 62
2 1207 7.79%46.15%1252 13 28 39 48 54 58 61
3 1208 7.80%1328 13 28 39 48 54 58 61
4 1176 7.59%1329 12 27 38 46 52 56 60
5 1151 7.43%1269 12 26 38 45 51 55 59
6 1109 7.15%1207 12 25 36 44 49 53 56
7 1112 7.18%21.48%1194 12 25 36 44 49 53 57
8 1108 7.15%1183 12 25 36 44 49 53 56
9 1230 7.94%1258 13 28 40 48 55 59 63
10 1257 8.11%32.37%1300 13 29 41 50 56 60 64
11 1225 7.90%1249 13 28 40 48 54 59 62
12 1304 8.41%1419 14 30 43 51 58 62 66
Totals 15496 100.00%Total 16525 161 354 505 611 688 742 788
TABLE 6 year Historical Data
3 Average Enrollment and Percentage Distributed by Grade Level
Grade 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 6yr Ave %
KDG 1098 1170 1232 1198 1237 1261 1199.33 7.74%
1 1089 1188 1219 1279 1210 1276 1210.17 7.81%
2 1083 1124 1196 1289 1300 1252 1207.33 7.79%
3 1111 1125 1136 1232 1317 1328 1208.17 7.80%
4 1038 1123 1156 1170 1237 1329 1175.50 7.59%
5 1070 1075 1122 1172 1199 1269 1151.17 7.43%
6 1041 1076 1059 1116 1152 1207 1108.50 7.15%
7 1086 1072 1091 1099 1132 1194 1112.33 7.18%
8 1017 1116 1088 1136 1108 1183 1108.00 7.15%
9 1200 1159 1275 1229 1261 1258 1230.33 7.94%
10 1278 1229 1169 1316 1248 1300 1256.67 8.11%
11 1164 1240 1211 1167 1318 1249 1224.83 7.90%
12 1321 1274 1323 1260 1226 1419 1303.83 8.41%
Totals 14596 14971 15277 15663 15945 16525 15496.17 100.00%
% of change 2.57%2.04%2.53%1.80%3.64%
change +/- 375 306 386 282 580
9.e
Packet Pg. 189
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-April 2018
48
TABLE 4 New Projects - Pupil Projection Cumulative
ND 3.13 by Grade Level Updated April 2018
Uses a 'cohort survival'GRADE 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2024-25 2025-26
model assuming 100% of Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected
previous year new KDG 1261 1299 1339 1377 1410 1442 1471 1501
enrollees move to the next 1 1276 1320 1361 1397 1432 1463 1493 1522
grade level.2 1252 1311 1357 1394 1428 1460 1489 1518
3 1328 1283 1344 1386 1421 1452 1482 1510
Kindergarten calculates 4 1329 1367 1324 1381 1420 1451 1481 1510
previous years number plus 5 1269 1362 1401 1355 1408 1445 1475 1504
K-5 7715 7941 8125 8291 8519 8713 8892 9065
Current generation based on 6 1207 1279 1373 1410 1360 1411 1446 1474
% of total enrollment. Other 7 1194 1239 1313 1404 1438 1385 1435 1470
factor uses 100% cohort 8 1183 1222 1268 1339 1428 1459 1405 1454
survival, based on 6 year GR 6-8 3584 3739 3955 4154 4225 4256 4286 4398
history.9 1258 1372 1414 1459 1527 1615 1645 1591
10 1300 1282 1399 1437 1480 1546 1631 1660
11 1249 13 28 40 48 54 59 62
12 1419 1293 1278 1392 1427 1467 1531 1616
GR 9-12 5226 3959 4119 4328 4483 4682 4866 4929
Total 16525 15639 16199 16772 17227 17650 18044 18392
% of change -5.36%3.58%3.54%2.71%2.46%2.24%1.93%
change +/- -886 560 573 455 423 394 347
TABLE 5 New Projects - Pupil Projection Cumulative
ND 3.6 by Grade Level Updated April 2018
Uses a 'cohort survival'GRADE 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2024-25 2025-26 2022-23 2023-24
model assuming 100% of Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected
previous year new KDG 1261 1306 1353 1398 1438 1477 1514 1550 1568 1585
enrollees move to the next 1 1276 1333 1381 1425 1466 1505 1541 1578 1595 1614
grade level.2 1252 1327 1387 1430 1472 1510 1547 1583 1601 1620
3 1328 1297 1374 1430 1471 1510 1546 1582 1600 1619
Kindergarten calculates 4 1329 1367 1338 1411 1464 1502 1539 1576 1594 1612
previous years number plus 5 1269 1373 1413 1381 1451 1501 1538 1574 1591 1609
K-5 7715 8002 8245 8476 8762 9005 9226 9443 9550 9658
Current generation based on 6 1207 1280 1385 1422 1386 1454 1502 1538 1556 1573
% of total enrollment. Other 7 1194 1252 1326 1430 1464 1425 1491 1539 1556 1574
factor uses 100% cohort 8 1183 1233 1293 1365 1465 1496 1456 1521 1539 1556
survival, based on 6 year GR 6-8 3584 3764 4005 4218 4314 4376 4449 4598 4650 4703
history.9 1258 1370 1423 1482 1551 1650 1680 1640 1658 1677
10 1300 1300 1415 1465 1520 1587 1684 1714 1733 1753
11 1249 1301 1302 1414 1460 1512 1578 1673 1692 1711
12 1419 1361 1416 1415 1523 1568 1618 1683 1702 1722
GR 9-12 5226 5331 5556 5776 6055 6317 6560 6710 6786 6863
Total 16525 17097 17806 18469 19131 19697 20235 20751 20986 21225
% of change 3.46%4.14%3.73%3.58%2.96%2.73%2.55%1.14%1.14%
change +/- 572 709 663 662 566 538 515 236 238
9.e
Packet Pg. 190
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-April 2018
49
TABLE 6 New Developments - Pupil Projection Cumulative 3.31%1.14%
ND3.13A by Grade Level Updated April 2018
Uses a 'cohort survival'GRADE 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2024-25 2025-26
model assuming 100% of Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected
previous year new KDG 1261 1234 1261 1285 1312
enrollees move to the next 1 1276 1320 1296 1319 1340 1365
grade level.2 1252 1311 1357 1329 1350 1368 1391
3 1328 1283 1344 1386 1356 1374 1390 1412
Kindergarten calculates 4 1329 1367 1324 1381 1420 1387 1403 1419
birth rate average plus 5 1269 1362 1401 1355 1408 1445 1410 1427
7715 7876 7982 8056 8186 6938 5594 4258
Current generation based on 6 1207 1279 1373 1410 1360 1411 1446 1410
% of total enrollment. Other 7 1194 1239 1313 1404 1438 1385 1435 1470
factor uses 100% cohort 8 1183 1222 1268 1339 1428 1459 1405 1454
survival, based on 6 year 3584 3739 3955 4154 4225 4256 4286 4334
history.9 1258 1372 1414 1459 1527 1615 1645 1591
10 1300 1282 1399 1437 1480 1546 1631 1660
11 1249 1292 1276 1389 1424 1463 1528 1612
12 1419 1309 1355 1337 1446 1480 1517 1582
5226 5254 5444 5622 5878 6104 6321 6445
Total 16525 16869 17381 17831 18289
% of change 2.08%3.03%2.59%2.57%
change +/- 344 512 450 458
TABLE 7 New Projects - Pupil Projection Cumulative
ND 3.6A by Grade Level Updated April 2018
Uses a 'cohort survival'GRADE 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2024-25 2025-26
model assuming 100% of Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected
previous year new KDG 1261 1234 1261 1285 1312
enrollees move to the next 1 1276 1333 1309 1333 1353 1379
grade level.2 1252 1327 1387 1358 1380 1397 1421
3 1328 1297 1374 1430 1399 1418 1433 1456
Kindergarten calculates 4 1329 1367 1338 1411 1464 1431 1447 1463
birth rate average plus 5 1269 1373 1413 1381 1451 1501 1466 1482
7715 7930 8081 8199 8359
Current generation based on 6 1207 1280 1385 1422 1386 1454 1502 1466
% of total enrollment. Other 7 1194 1252 1326 1430 1464 1425 1491 1539
factor uses 100% cohort 8 1183 1233 1293 1365 1465 1496 1456 1521
survival, based on 6 year 3584 3764 4005 4218 4314 4376 4449 4526
history.9 1258 1370 1423 1482 1551 1650 1680 1640
10 1300 1300 1415 1465 1520 1587 1684 1714
11 1249 1301 1302 1414 1460 1512 1578 1673
12 1419 1361 1416 1415 1523 1568 1618 1683
5226 5331 5556 5776 6055 6317 6560 6710
Total 16525 17025 17642 18192 18728
% of change 3.03%3.62%3.12%2.94%
change +/- 500 617 550 536
9.e
Packet Pg. 191
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey
9.e
Packet Pg. 192
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Auburn School District
Development Growth since 1/1/13
April 2018 (Based on November 1, 2017 Enrollment)
51
SINGLE FAMILY
Elem Middle HS Total Elem Middle HS Total
Alicia Glenn 2016 28 28 0 Arthur Jacobsen 9 3 9 21 0.321 0.107 0.321 0.750
Anthem
(formerly Megan's Meadows)2018 13 9 0 Ilalko 6 1 1 8 0.667 0.111 0.111 0.889
Bridges 386 291 95 Lea Hill 57 23 31 111 0.366 0.268 0.347 0.981
Canyon Creek 154 152 2 Evergreen Hts.25 3 8 36 0.164 0.020 0.053 0.237
Kendall Ridge 2015 104 104 0 Arthur Jacobsen 23 11 13 47 0.221 0.106 0.125 0.452
Lakeland East: Portola 2015 130 130 0 Ilalko 45 21 33 99 0.346 0.162 0.254 0.762
Lakeland: Edgeview 2015 368 368 0 Gildo Rey 63 29 28 120 0.171 0.079 0.076 0.326
Lakeland Hills Estates 2017 66 66 0 Gildo Rey 18 8 14 40 0.273 0.121 0.212 0.606
Lakeland: Pinnacle Estates 99 76 23 Lakeland Hills 49 18 18 85 0.645 0.237 0.237 1.118
Lakeland: Villas at…2015 81 81 0 Ilalko 26 8 7 41 0.321 0.099 0.086 0.506
Monterey Park 2016 235 235 0 Evergreen Hts.42 21 32 95 0.179 0.089 0.136 0.404
Mountain View 2018 55 55 0 Evergreen Hts.9 2 3 14 0.164 0.036 0.055 0.255
Sonata Hills 2017 71 71 0 Lea Hill 9 5 5 19 0.127 0.070 0.070 0.268
Spencer Place 13 5 8 Arthur Jacobsen 8 6 0 14 1.600 1.200 0.000 2.800
Sterling Court 2013 8 8 0 Hazelwood 2 2 2 6 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.750
Vintage Place 2014 26 26 0 Lea Hill 8 4 6 18 0.308 0.154 0.231 0.692
Totals 1837 1705 128 399 165 210 774 0.234 0.097 0.123 0.454
Student Generation FactorsFeeder
Elementary
Units/
Parcels
Current
Occupancy
To Be
Occupied
Actual StudentsYear of Full
OccupancyDevelopment Name
9.e
Packet Pg. 193
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
Auburn School District
Development Growth since 1/1/13
April 2018 (Based on November 1, 2017 Enrollment)
52
SINGLE FAMILY--2018 and beyond
Middle HS Total
Anderson Acres 14 0 14 1 2 6
Backbone Ridge 7 0 7 1 1 3
Bridle Estates 18 0 18 2 2 8
Hastings 10 *10 0 10 1 1 5
Hazel Heights 22 0 22 2 3 10
Hazel View 20 0 20 2 2 9
Lakeland: Forest Glen At ..30 0 30 3 4 14
Lakeland: Park Ridge 256 0 256 25 32 116
Lakeland: River Rock*14 0 14 1 2 6
Pacific Lane 11 0 11 1 1 5
Ridge At Tall Timbers 104 0 104 10 13 47
Willow Place*18 0 18 2 2 8
Yates Plat*16 0 16 2 2 7
Auburn Gateway 500 0 500 48 62 227
Dulcinea 6 0 6 1 1 3
Richardson BLA/Plat 6 0 6 1 1 3
Vasiliy 8 0 8 1 1 4
Wesport Capital 306 0 306 30 38 139
1366 1366 Totals 132 168 620
* currently under construction
Estimated Students Based on
Student Generation FactorsUnits/
Parcels
Current
OccupancyDevelopment Name To Be
Occupied Elem
3
2
4
2
5
5
7
60
3
3
24
4
4
320
117
72
1
1
2
9.e
Packet Pg. 194
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
Auburn School District
Development Growth since 1/1/13
April 2018 (Based on November 1, 2017 Enrollment)
53
MULTI FAMILY
Elem Middle HS Total Elem Middle HS Total
Lakeland: Four Lakes Apts 2014 234 234 0 Ilalko 15 11 16 42 0.064 0.047 0.068 0.179
Promenade Apts *
(formerly Auburn Hills)294 211 109 Lea Hill 75 29 23 127 0.355 0.137 0.109 0.602
Trail Run Townhomes 2014 115 115 0 Evergreen Hts.15 5 6 26 0.130 0.043 0.052 0.226
The Villas at Auburn *295 74 206 Washington 34 23 22 79 0.680 0.460 0.440 1.580
Totals 938 634 315 139 68 67 274 0.219 0.107 0.106 0.432
2018 and beyond
Sundallen Condos 48 0 48 11 5 5 21
Total 11 5 5 21
Estimated Students Based on
Student Generation Factors
Student Generation FactorsUnits/
Parcels
Current
Occupancy
Units/
Parcels
Current
Occupancy
To Be
Occupied
* Current May 2018 Enrollment used for these two complexes.
Development Name To Be
Occupied
Actual Students Feeder
Elementary
Year of Full
Occupancy
9.e
Packet Pg. 195
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
S
D
C
a
p
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
4
F
I
N
A
L
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
2018-2019 - 2023-2024
April 2018
9.f
Packet Pg. 196
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
9.f
Packet Pg. 197
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
1
9.f
Packet Pg. 198
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
2
9.f
Packet Pg. 199
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
3
9.f
Packet Pg. 200
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
4
9.f
Packet Pg. 201
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
5
9.f
Packet Pg. 202
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
6
9.f
Packet Pg. 203
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
7
9.f
Packet Pg. 204
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
8
9.f
Packet Pg. 205
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
9
9.f
Packet Pg. 206
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
10
9.f
Packet Pg. 207
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
11
9.f
Packet Pg. 208
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
12
9.f
Packet Pg. 209
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
13
9.f
Packet Pg. 210
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
14
9.f
Packet Pg. 211
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
15
9.f
Packet Pg. 212
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
16
9.f
Packet Pg. 213
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
17
9.f
Packet Pg. 214
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
18
9.f
Packet Pg. 215
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
19
9.f
Packet Pg. 216
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
20
9.f
Packet Pg. 217
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
21
9.f
Packet Pg. 218
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
22
9.f
Packet Pg. 219
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
23
9.f
Packet Pg. 220
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
24
9.f
Packet Pg. 221
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
25
9.f
Packet Pg. 222
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
26
9.f
Packet Pg. 223
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
27
9.f
Packet Pg. 224
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
28
9.f
Packet Pg. 225
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
29
9.f
Packet Pg. 226
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
30
9.f
Packet Pg. 227
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
31
9.f
Packet Pg. 228
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
32
9.f
Packet Pg. 229
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
33
9.f
Packet Pg. 230
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
34
9.f
Packet Pg. 231
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
35
9.f
Packet Pg. 232
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
36
9.f
Packet Pg. 233
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
37
9.f
Packet Pg. 234
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
K
S
D
_
2
0
1
8
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
1
4
3
9
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
A
m
e
n
d
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
&
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
&
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
Derek Matheson, Chief Administrative Officer
220 Fourth Ave S
Kent, WA 98032
256-856-5712
DATE: November 6, 2018
TO: Operations Committee
SUBJECT: Utility Tax Sunset & Allocation Ordinance - Recommend
MOTION: Recommend Council adopt an ordinance relating to internal
utility taxes amending Kent City Code 3.18.020 to remove the sunset of
15.38% of the internal utility tax collected, and to reallocate the funds
generated from the 15.38% internal utility tax to the general fund once the
other capital projects fund debt is retired.
SUMMARY: Currently, 15.38% of the City’s internal utility tax is allocated to the
payment of debt in the other capital projects fund (previously known as the 2%
internal utility tax). This portion is scheduled to sunset on January 1, 2023, or on
the first day of the year following the date the debt in this fund is fully retired,
whichever occurs first.
The current estimated date to fully retire the debt is December 2020, which would
sunset the tax on January 1, 2021.
The 15-year General Fund forecasts presented at Council retreats and budget road
show meetings included the continuance and re-allocation of this portion of the
internal utility tax. It is one piece of the overall strategy to mitigate the upcoming
reduction in revenues, commonly referred to as the City’s “fiscal cliff”.
BUDGET IMPACT: As described
SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL:
Sustainable Services
ATTACHMENTS:
1. 3.18.020 Internal Utility Tax Sunset and Allocation - October 2018 Draft
(PDF)
10
Packet Pg. 235
1 Utility Tax Eliminate Sunset
Allocate to General Operations
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, amending Section
3.18.020, entitled “Certain utilities subject to tax,”
to eliminate the sunset of the allocation of certain
internal utility taxes to the payment of debt in the
City’s other capital projects fund, and to reallocate
the these internal utility taxes to the general fund
once the debt in the other capital projects fund is
retired.
RECITALS
A. KCC 3.18.020(A)(6)(b) allocates 15.38 percent of the City’s
internal utility tax to the payment of debt in the City’s other capital
projects fund. This portion of the internal utility tax is scheduled to sunset
on January 1, 2023, or on the first day of the year following the date the
debt in this fund is fully retired, whichever occurs first.
B. The current estimated date to fully retire the debt in this fund
is December 2020, which would sunset the tax on January 1, 2021.
10.a
Packet Pg. 236
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
1
8
.
0
2
0
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
T
a
x
S
u
n
s
e
t
a
n
d
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
-
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
2
0
1
8
D
r
a
f
t
(
1
4
4
1
:
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
T
a
x
S
u
n
s
e
t
&
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
-
2 Utility Tax Eliminate Sunset
Allocate to General Operations
C. The city has a demonstrated need to increase funds available
for general operations in 2021. The City is facing a significant reduction in
revenue, commonly referred to as the City’s “fiscal cliff,” when, in October
of 2019, it will no longer receive approximately $5 million of streamlined
sales tax mitigation, and in June of 2020, it will no longer receive $4.7
million of annexation sales tax credit. Coupled with an ongoing structural
imbalance of $2 million, the expected impact is a loss of $11.7 million to
the City.
D. To partially offset this reduction in revenues, this ordinance
eliminates the sunset of this internal utility tax, and, when the other
capital projects fund debt is retired, reallocates those monies to the City’s
general fund.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT,
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE
SECTION 1. – Amendment. Section 3.18.020 of the Kent City
Code, entitled “Certain utilities subject to tax,” is hereby amended as
follows:
Sec. 3.18.020. Certain utilities subject to tax.
A. In addition to the other business and license fees required by the
ordinances of the city, the city levies upon all persons, firms, or
corporations (including the city) engaged in certain business activities a
utilities tax to be collected as follows:
1. Upon every person, firm, or corporation engaging in or carrying
on any telephone business within the city, an annual tax equal to six
percent of the total gross income, including revenues from intrastate toll,
10.a
Packet Pg. 237
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
1
8
.
0
2
0
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
T
a
x
S
u
n
s
e
t
a
n
d
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
-
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
2
0
1
8
D
r
a
f
t
(
1
4
4
1
:
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
T
a
x
S
u
n
s
e
t
&
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
-
3 Utility Tax Eliminate Sunset
Allocate to General Operations
derived from the operation of such business within the city. This six
percent tax will be allocated as follows: 4.7 percent to the general fund,
0.3 percent to youth/teen programs, and one percent to street
improvement programs.
2. Upon every person, firm, or corporation engaging in or carrying
on a business of selling, wheeling, furnishing, distributing, or producing
gas, whether manufactured or natural, for commercial or domestic use or
purposes, a fee or tax equal to six percent of the total gross income from
such business in the city during the tax year for which the license is
required. This six percent tax will be allocated as follows: 4.7 percent to
the general fund, 0.3 percent to youth/teen programs, and one percent to
street improvement programs.
3. Upon every person, firm, or corporation engaged in or carrying on
the business of selling, wheeling, furnishing, or distributing electricity for
light and power, a fee or tax equal to six percent of the total gross income
from such business in the city during the tax year for which a license is
required. This six percent tax will be allocated as follows: 4.7 percent to
the general fund, 0.3 percent to youth/teen programs, and one percent to
street improvement programs.
4. Upon every person, firm, or corporation engaged in or carrying on
the business of providing cable television services, a tax equal to six
percent of the total gross income from that business in the city during the
tax year for which the license is required. All revenue received from this
tax must be applied only to funding the city’s information technology
department operations and capital projects budgets in the proportion
determined by the city council in its biennial budget, including all
amendments.
10.a
Packet Pg. 238
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
1
8
.
0
2
0
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
T
a
x
S
u
n
s
e
t
a
n
d
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
-
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
2
0
1
8
D
r
a
f
t
(
1
4
4
1
:
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
T
a
x
S
u
n
s
e
t
&
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
-
4 Utility Tax Eliminate Sunset
Allocate to General Operations
5. Upon every person, firm, or corporation engaging in or carrying
on a business providing solid waste collection services, a tax equal to 18.4
percent of the total gross income from such business in the city during the
tax year for which the license is required. This 18.4 percent tax will be
allocated as follows: 6.5 percent to the general fund, 0.3 percent to
youth/teen programs, one percent to street improvement programs, and
10.6 percent to maintain and repair residential streets, including related
impacts to curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and other road amenities, including
crosswalks along with necessary appurtenances, and improvements related
to residential traffic calming, but this 10.6 percent portion of the solid
waste utility tax shall not be used to expand, extend, or widen existing
residential streets or to build new residential streets. The amount used
from this fund for neighborhood traffic calming devices and crosswalks
shall not exceed $150,000 in any year.
6. Upon every person (including the city) engaging in or carrying on
the business of selling, furnishing, or distributing water services, a tax
equal to 13 percent of the total gross income from that business in the city
during the tax year; upon every person (including the city) engaging in or
carrying on the business of selling, furnishing, or distributing sewer
services, a tax equal to 9.5 percent of the total gross income from that
business in the city during the tax year; and upon every person (including
the city) engaging in or carrying on the business of selling, furnishing, or
distributing drainage services, a tax equal to 19.5 percent of the total
gross income from such business in the city during the tax year. Unless
otherwise directed by the city council in its budget process, the total of
these tax revenues will be allocated as follows: 43.85 percent to the
general fund for the use as allocated in the city’s budget; 30.77 percent to
the capital resources fund, subject to the limitations provided in subsection
(A)(6)(a) of this section; 15.38 percent dedicated solely to the repayment
and elimination of debt in the city’s “other capital projects” fund subject to
10.a
Packet Pg. 239
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
1
8
.
0
2
0
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
T
a
x
S
u
n
s
e
t
a
n
d
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
-
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
2
0
1
8
D
r
a
f
t
(
1
4
4
1
:
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
T
a
x
S
u
n
s
e
t
&
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
-
5 Utility Tax Eliminate Sunset
Allocate to General Operations
the limitations provided in subsection (A)(6)(b) of this section; 7.69
percent to street improvement programs; and 2.31 percent to youth/teen
programs.
a. Unless otherwise allocated by council, these funds must be
applied equally to (i) information technology capital programs directed at
funding long- and short-term hardware and software replacement, and (ii)
street capital programs, but further restricted to funding street
maintenance, repair, and signage only.
b. The 15.38 percent internal tax allocation will be dedicated
to the city’s capital resources fund for the sole purpose of retiring all debt
in the city’s other capital projects fund; however, in any event this portion
of the tax shall be eliminated onprovided, starting January 1, 2023, or on
the first day of the year following the date the debt in this the other capital
projects fund is fully retired, whichever occurs first, this internal tax
allocation will be dedicated to the general fund for use as provided for in
the city’s budget.
B. In computing the tax provided in subsection (A) of this section,
the taxpayer may deduct from total gross income the following items:
1. The actual amount of credit losses and uncollectible
receivables sustained by the taxpayer.
2. Amounts derived from transactions in interstate and
foreign commerce which the city is prohibited from taxing under the laws
and Constitution of the United States.
SECTION 2. – Severability. If any one or more section, subsection,
or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this
ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect.
10.a
Packet Pg. 240
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
1
8
.
0
2
0
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
T
a
x
S
u
n
s
e
t
a
n
d
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
-
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
2
0
1
8
D
r
a
f
t
(
1
4
4
1
:
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
T
a
x
S
u
n
s
e
t
&
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
-
6 Utility Tax Eliminate Sunset
Allocate to General Operations
SECTION 3. – Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon
approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are
authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the
correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering;
or references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or
regulations.
SECTION 4. – Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and
be in force 30 days from the time of passage, as provided by law.
DANA RALPH, MAYOR Date Approved
ATTEST:
KIMBERLEY A. KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted
Date Published
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ARTHUR “PAT” FITZPATRICK, CITY ATTORNEY
10.a
Packet Pg. 241
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
1
8
.
0
2
0
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
T
a
x
S
u
n
s
e
t
a
n
d
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
-
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
2
0
1
8
D
r
a
f
t
(
1
4
4
1
:
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
T
a
x
S
u
n
s
e
t
&
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
-
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
Derek Matheson, Chief Administrative Officer
220 Fourth Ave S
Kent, WA 98032
256-856-5712
DATE: November 6, 2018
TO: Operations Committee
SUBJECT: B & O Tax Amendment Ordinance - Recommend
MOTION: Recommend Council adopt an ordinance relating to business and
occupation taxes amending Kent City Code 3.28.050 to increase gross
receipt and square footage taxes starting in 2020, and amending section
3.28.130 to clarify the allocation of revenues derived from business and
occupation taxes.
SUMMARY: The City is facing a significant reduction in revenue, commonly
referred to as the City’s “fiscal cliff,” when, in October of 2019, it will no longer
receive approximately $5 million of streamlined sales tax mitigation, and in June of
2020, it will no longer receive $4.7 million of annexation sales tax credit. Coupled
with an ongoing structural imbalance of $2 million, the expected impact is a loss of
$11.7 million to the City.
The Mayor and City Council have held numerous public meetings in an effort to
engage the public regarding the issues facing the City budget as well as the
potential for an increase to the City’s business and occupation tax. The 15-year
General Fund forecasts presented at those meetings included a series of business
and occupation and square footage tax rate increases beginning January 1, 2020.
The series of increases is one piece of the overall strategy to mitigate the upcoming
reduction in revenues and address an ongoing structural imbalance.
BUDGET IMPACT: As described
SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL:
Sustainable Services
ATTACHMENTS:
1. B&O Tax Rate Amendment - KCC 3.28 - October 2018 DRAFT (PDF)
11
Packet Pg. 242
1 Amend Ch. 3.28 KCC -
B&O Rates and Allocations
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, amending Section
3.28.050 of the Kent City Code, entitled
“Imposition of the tax – Tax or fee levied,” to
increase gross receipts rates and square footage
tax and establish a gross receipts cap on retailing,
and Section 3.28.130 of the Kent City Code,
entitled “Limitation of revenue received,” to clarify
the allocation of revenues derived by Chapter 3.28
of the Kent City Code.
RECITALS
A. In 2012, the City enacted a business and occupation tax and
a square footage tax.
B. In 2017, the City increased its square footage tax effective
January 1, 2019, and dedicated the increase in revenue to capital needs.
C. The City is facing a significant reduction in revenue,
commonly referred to as the City’s “fiscal cliff,” when, in October of 2019,
it will no longer receive approximately $5 million of streamlined sales tax
mitigation, and in June of 2020, it will no longer receive $4.7 million of
annexation sales tax credit. Coupled with an ongoing structural imbalance
of $2 million, the expected impact is a loss of $11.7 million to the City. In
the event the legislature reallocates streamlined sales tax mitigation funds
to the City, the amount of those funds will be unknown and will be subject
11.a
Packet Pg. 243
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
B
&
O
T
a
x
R
a
t
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
-
K
C
C
3
.
2
8
-
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
2
0
1
8
D
R
A
F
T
(
1
4
4
2
:
B
&
O
T
a
x
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
-
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
)
2 Amend Ch. 3.28 KCC -
B&O Rates and Allocations
to modification or termination at the will of the legislature. As a result,
even if the legislature restores some amount of streamlined mitigation
funding, the City will be unable to reliably depend on this funding source.
D. The Mayor and City Council have held numerous public
meetings in an effort to engage the public regarding the issues facing the
City budget as well as the potential for an increase to the City’s business
and occupation tax. Meetings where the budget and/or the business and
occupation tax as well as other revenue issues have been discussed
occurred as follows: February 2-3, 2018, Council retreat; March 9, 2018,
Council retreat; March 27, 2018, Budget Road Show; April 21, 2018,
Budget Road Show; May 17, 2018, Budget Road Show; July 13, 2018,
special Council workshop; September 18, 2018, budget hearing;
September 25, 2018, special Council meeting/Mayor’s budget
presentation; September 25, 2018, special Council workshop; October 6,
2018, special Council workshop; October 9, 2018, special Council
workshop; October 16, 2018, Council workshop; and the October 16,
2018, budget hearing.
E. In her 2019-2020 budget instructions, the Mayor directed
non-public safety departments funded by general revenues to identify
expense reductions totaling at least $2.1 million for 2020. Even with these
reductions and $2.2 million of other sustainable revenue increases, the
City’s general fund revenues are insufficient to cover expected expenses.
F. After extensive consideration, the Council has determined
that the business and occupation tax and square footage tax rate should
be increased beginning January 1, 2020, in order to help fund the general
operations of the City and that funds derived from the increases should be
dedicated for that purpose.
11.a
Packet Pg. 244
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
B
&
O
T
a
x
R
a
t
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
-
K
C
C
3
.
2
8
-
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
2
0
1
8
D
R
A
F
T
(
1
4
4
2
:
B
&
O
T
a
x
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
-
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
)
3 Amend Ch. 3.28 KCC -
B&O Rates and Allocations
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT,
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE
SECTION 1. – Amendment. Section 3.28.050 of the Kent City
Code, entitled “Imposition of the tax – Tax or fee levied,” as amended by
Ordinance 4242 and later amended by Section 1 of Ordinance 4260, is
hereby amended effective January 1, 2019, as follows:
3.28.050 Imposition of the tax – Tax or fee levied. (Effective
January 1, 2019)
Except as provided in subsection (C) of this section, there is hereby levied
upon and shall be collected from every person a tax for the act or privilege
of engaging in business activities within the city, whether the person’s
office or place of business be within or without the city. The tax shall be in
amounts to be determined by application of rates against the gross
proceeds of sale, gross income of business, or value of products, including
byproducts, and by application of rates against the square footage of
business office or facility space within the city, as the case may be, as
follows:
A. Gross receipts tax.
1. Upon every person engaging within the city in business as an
extractor; as to such persons the amount of the tax with respect to such
business shall be equal to the value of the products, including byproducts,
extracted within the city for sale or for commercial or industrial use,
multiplied by the rate of 0.152 hundredths of one percent (0.00152)
through December 31, 2021, and multiplied by the rate of 0.200
11.a
Packet Pg. 245
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
B
&
O
T
a
x
R
a
t
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
-
K
C
C
3
.
2
8
-
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
2
0
1
8
D
R
A
F
T
(
1
4
4
2
:
B
&
O
T
a
x
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
-
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
)
4 Amend Ch. 3.28 KCC -
B&O Rates and Allocations
hundredths of one percent (0.002) effective January 1, 2022. The measure
of the tax is the value of the products, including byproducts, so extracted,
regardless of the place of sale or the fact that deliveries may be made to
points outside the city.
2. Upon every person engaging within the city in business as a
manufacturer, as to such persons the amount of the tax with respect to
such business shall be equal to the value of the products, including
byproducts, manufactured within the city, multiplied by the rate of 0.046
hundredths of one percent (0.00046) through December 31, 2021, and
multiplied by the rate of 0.100 hundredths of one percent (.001) effective
January 1, 2022. The measure of the tax is the value of the products,
including byproducts, so manufactured, regardless of the place of sale or
the fact that deliveries may be made to points outside the city.
3. Upon every person engaging within the city in the business of
making sales at wholesale, as to such persons, the amount of tax with
respect to such business shall be equal to the gross proceeds of such sales
of the business without regard to the place of delivery of articles,
commodities or merchandise sold, multiplied by the rate of 0.152
hundredths of one percent (0.00152) through December 31, 2019, and
multiplied by the rate of 0.200 hundredths of one percent (0.002) effective
January 1, 2020.
4. Upon every person engaging within the city in the business of
making sales at retail, as to such persons, the amount of tax with respect
to such business shall be equal to the gross proceeds of such sales of the
business, without regard to the place of delivery of articles, commodities
or merchandise sold, multiplied by the rate of 0.046 hundredths of one
percent (0.00046) through December 31, 2021, and multiplied by the rate
of 0.100 hundredths of one percent (.001) effective January 1, 2022.
11.a
Packet Pg. 246
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
B
&
O
T
a
x
R
a
t
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
-
K
C
C
3
.
2
8
-
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
2
0
1
8
D
R
A
F
T
(
1
4
4
2
:
B
&
O
T
a
x
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
-
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
)
5 Amend Ch. 3.28 KCC -
B&O Rates and Allocations
5. Upon every person engaging within the city in the business of
(a) printing, (b) both printing and publishing newspapers, magazines,
periodicals, books, music, and other printed items, (c) publishing
newspapers, magazines and periodicals, (d) extracting for hire, and (e)
processing for hire; as to such persons, the amount of tax on such
business shall be equal to the gross income of the business multiplied by
the rate of 0.046 hundredths of one percent (0.00046) through December
31, 2021, and multiplied by the rate of 0.100 hundredths of one percent
(.001) effective January 1, 2022.
6. Upon every person engaging within the city in the business of
making sales of retail services; as to such persons, the amount of tax with
respect to such business shall be equal to the gross proceeds of sales
multiplied by the rate of 0.152 hundredths of one percent (0.00152)
through December 31, 2021, and multiplied by the rate of 0.200
hundredths of one percent (0.002) effective January 1, 2022.
7. Upon every other person engaging within the city in any
business activity other than or in addition to those enumerated in the
above subsections; as to such persons, the amount of tax on account of
such activities shall be equal to the gross income of the business multiplied
by the rate of 0.152 hundredths of one percent (0.00152) through
December 31, 2021, and multiplied by the rate of 0.200 hundredths of one
percent (0.002) effective January 1, 2022. This subsection includes,
among others, and without limiting the scope hereof (whether or not title
to material used in the performance of such business passes to another by
accession, merger, or other than by outright sale), persons engaged in the
business of developing or producing custom software or of customizing
canned software, producing royalties or commissions, and persons
11.a
Packet Pg. 247
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
B
&
O
T
a
x
R
a
t
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
-
K
C
C
3
.
2
8
-
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
2
0
1
8
D
R
A
F
T
(
1
4
4
2
:
B
&
O
T
a
x
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
-
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
)
6 Amend Ch. 3.28 KCC -
B&O Rates and Allocations
engaged in the business of rendering any type of service which does not
constitute a sale at retail, a sale at wholesale, or a retail service.
B. Square footage tax. Upon every person who leases, owns, occupies,
or otherwise maintains an office, warehouse, or other place of business
within the city for purposes of engaging in business activities in the city,
the tax shall be measured by the number of square feet of warehouse
business floor space or other business floor space for each office,
warehouse, or other place of business leased, owned, occupied, or
otherwise maintained within the city during the reporting period, calculated
to the nearest square foot.
1. Subject to the reductions established in subsection (B)(6) of
this section, the amount of the tax due shall be equal to the sum of the
number of square feet of business warehouse floor space for each business
warehouse leased, owned, occupied, or otherwise maintained within the
city multiplied by the rate of $0.06 quarterlyrate for each calendar year
listed below, and the number of square feet of other business floor space
for each office or other place of business leased, owned, occupied, or
otherwise maintained within the city multiplied by the rate of $0.02
quarterlyrate for each calendar year list below.
Effective Date Business Warehouse
Floor Space
Other Business Floor
Space
1/1/2019 0.06 quarterly rate
0.24 annual rate
0.02 quarterly rate
0.08 annual rate
1/1/2020 0.09 quarterly rate
0.36 annual rate
0.02 quarterly rate
0.08 annual rate
1/1/2025 0.12 quarterly rate
0.48 annual rate
0.02 quarterly rate
0.08 annual rate
11.a
Packet Pg. 248
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
B
&
O
T
a
x
R
a
t
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
-
K
C
C
3
.
2
8
-
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
2
0
1
8
D
R
A
F
T
(
1
4
4
2
:
B
&
O
T
a
x
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
-
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
)
7 Amend Ch. 3.28 KCC -
B&O Rates and Allocations
1/1/2028 0.15 quarterly rate
0.60 annual rate
0.03 quarterly rate
0.12 annual rate
2. For purposes of this section, business warehouse means a
building or structure, or any part thereof, in which goods, wares,
merchandise, or commodities are received or stored, whether or not for
compensation, in furtherance of engaging in business.
3. For purposes of this section, other business floor space means
the floor space of an office or place of business, other than a business
warehouse.
4. For purposes of this section, the square footage shall be
computed by measuring to the inside finish of permanent outer building
walls and shall include space used by columns and projections necessary to
the building. Square footage shall not include stairs, elevator shafts, flues,
pipe shafts, vertical ducts, heating or ventilation shafts, janitor closets,
and electrical or utility closets.
5. Persons with more than one office, warehouse, or other place
of business within the city must include all business warehouse floor space
and other business floor space for all locations within the city. When a
person rents space to another person, the person occupying the rental
space is responsible for the square footage business tax on that rental
space only if the renter has exclusive right of possession in the space as
against the landlord. Space rented for the storage of goods in a warehouse
where no walls separate the goods, and where the exclusive right of
possession in the space is not held by the person to whom the space is
rented, shall be included in the warehouse business floor space of the
person that operates the warehouse business, and not by the person
renting the warehouse space.
11.a
Packet Pg. 249
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
B
&
O
T
a
x
R
a
t
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
-
K
C
C
3
.
2
8
-
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
2
0
1
8
D
R
A
F
T
(
1
4
4
2
:
B
&
O
T
a
x
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
-
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
)
8 Amend Ch. 3.28 KCC -
B&O Rates and Allocations
6. If the square footage tax imposed in this subsection (B) is
less than or equal to the gross receipts tax imposed in subsection (A) of
this section, no square footage tax will be due; if the square footage tax
imposed in this subsection (B) exceeds the gross receipts tax imposed in
subsection (A) of this section, the taxpayer shall also remit the excess over
the gross receipts tax payable under subsection (A) of this section.
C. Gross receipts and square footage threshold.
1. Gross receipts threshold. The gross receipts tax imposed in
subsection (A) of this section shall not apply to any person engaging in any
one or more business activities which are otherwise taxable pursuant to
this section, whose value of products, including byproducts, gross proceeds
of sales, and gross income of the business, as the case may be, from all
activities conducted within the city during any calendar year does not
exceed the threshold amount of $250,000.
2. Square footage threshold. The square footage tax imposed in
subsection (B) of this section shall not apply to any person unless that
person’s total floor area of business space within the city exceeds the
following threshold:
a. Four thousand taxable square feet of business
warehouse space; or
b. Twelve thousand taxable square feet of other business
floor space.
11.a
Packet Pg. 250
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
B
&
O
T
a
x
R
a
t
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
-
K
C
C
3
.
2
8
-
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
2
0
1
8
D
R
A
F
T
(
1
4
4
2
:
B
&
O
T
a
x
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
-
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
)
9 Amend Ch. 3.28 KCC -
B&O Rates and Allocations
If the square footage tax applies, it applies to all business space leased,
owned, occupied, or otherwise maintained by the taxpayer during the
applicable reporting period.
D. Gross Receipts Maximum – Retailing Activities. Effective January 1,
2022, the gross receipts tax imposed in subsection (A) of this section shall
not apply to retailing activities exceeding $20,000,000 in any calendar
year which are otherwise taxable pursuant to this section.
DE. Rules. The director may promulgate rules and regulations regarding
the manner, means, and method of calculating any tax imposed under this
section.
SECTION 2. – Amendment. Section 3.28.130 of the Kent City
Code, entitled “Limitation of revenue received,” as amended by Ordinance
4147 and later amended by Section 2 of Ordinance 4260 is hereby
amended effective January 1, 2019, as follows:
3.28.130 Limitation of revenue received. (Effective January
1, 2019) One-half of the revenue received from the square footage tax
shall be allocated to the city’s capital resources fund. Remaining revenue
Revenue received from the taxes imposed by this chapter shall then be
dedicated to the general operations of the city subject to the following two
exceptions:
A. Revenues equivalent to the original gross receipts and square
footage rates in effect from 2013 through 2018 shall first be applied to the
actual cost to staff and operate the business and occupation tax division,
including one information technology position dedicated to supporting that
division, but not to exceed the amount budgeted for that division by the
city council. After the above allocations, 100 percent of any
residualRemaining revenue shall be allocated to the design, construction,
11.a
Packet Pg. 251
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
B
&
O
T
a
x
R
a
t
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
-
K
C
C
3
.
2
8
-
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
2
0
1
8
D
R
A
F
T
(
1
4
4
2
:
B
&
O
T
a
x
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
-
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
)
10 Amend Ch. 3.28 KCC -
B&O Rates and Allocations
maintenance, improvement, operation, and repair of the city’s
transportation infrastructure and appurtenant improvements including,
without limitation, streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, bicycle and
pedestrian lanes and paths, street trees, drainage, lighting, and
signalization.
B. Square footage revenues equivalent to 0.03 quarterly on business
warehouse floor space and 0.01 quarterly on other business floor space
shall be allocated to the city’s capital resource fund.
SECTION 3. – Severability. If any one or more section, subsection,
or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this
ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 4. – Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon
approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are
authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the
correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering;
or references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or
regulations.
SECTION 5. – Petition for Referendum. Pursuant to RCW
35.21.706, the city shall provide for a referendum procedure to apply to
this ordinance increasing the rate of the city’s business and occupation tax.
A referendum petition may be filed with the city clerk within seven days of
passage of this ordinance. Within 10 days, the city clerk shall confer with
the petitioner concerning the form and style of the petition, issue the
petition an identification number, and secure an accurate, concise, and
positive ballot title from the city attorney. The petitioner shall have 30
days in which to secure the signatures of not less than 15 percent of the
registered voters of the city, as of the last municipal general election, upon
11.a
Packet Pg. 252
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
B
&
O
T
a
x
R
a
t
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
-
K
C
C
3
.
2
8
-
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
2
0
1
8
D
R
A
F
T
(
1
4
4
2
:
B
&
O
T
a
x
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
-
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
)
11 Amend Ch. 3.28 KCC -
B&O Rates and Allocations
petition forms which contain the ballot title and the full text of the measure
to be referred. The city clerk shall verify the sufficiency of the signatures
on the petition and, if sufficient valid signatures are properly submitted,
shall certify the referendum measure to the next election ballot within the
city or at a special election ballot as provided pursuant to RCW
35.17.260(2). This referendum procedure shall be the exclusive method of
referendum for this ordinance, and shall supersede all other statutory
initiative or referendum procedures that may apply.
SECTION 6. – Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and
be in force thirty days from and after its passage, as provided by law.
DANA RALPH, MAYOR Date Approved
ATTEST:
KIMBERLEY A. KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted
Date Published
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ARTHUR “PAT” FITZPATRICK, CITY ATTORNEY
11.a
Packet Pg. 253
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
B
&
O
T
a
x
R
a
t
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
-
K
C
C
3
.
2
8
-
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
2
0
1
8
D
R
A
F
T
(
1
4
4
2
:
B
&
O
T
a
x
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
-
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
)
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
Derek Matheson, Chief Administrative Officer
220 Fourth Ave S
Kent, WA 98032
256-856-5712
DATE: November 6, 2018
TO: Operations Committee
SUBJECT: Amend Capital Facilities Element of Comprehensive Plan for
2019-2024 Capital Improvement Plan
MOTION: Recommend Council approve the ordinance amending the Capital
Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan to reflect the 2019-2024
Capital Improvement Plan.
SUMMARY: Per procedures established in KCC 12.02, the Capital Facilities
Element of the Comprehensive Plan is amended concurrently with the adoption or
amendment of the City’s budget to reflect the updated 2019-2024 Capital
Improvement Plan. This process assures that the comprehensive plan remains
relevant and up-to-date.
The 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Plan identifies a six-year plan for capital
improvement projects, including costs and revenue sources.
BUDGET IMPACT: As described
SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL:
Sustainable Services
ATTACHMENTS:
1. CompPlanAmend-CapitalImprovePlan 2019 Ordinance (PDF)
2. 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (PDF)
3. CompPlanAmend-CapitalImprovePlan EIS_Comp Plan Addendum (PDF)
12
Packet Pg. 254
1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
to the Capital Facilities Element for
2019-2024 Capital Improvements
ORDINANCE NO.________
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, amending the Kent
Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities
Element to reflect a six-year plan for capital
improvement projects (2019-2024) (CPA-2017-7).
RECITALS
A. The State of Washington Growth Management Act (GMA)
requires internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements and
the plans from other jurisdictions.
B. To assure that comprehensive plans remain relevant and up
to date, the GMA allows amendments to the capital facilities element of
comprehensive plans concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a
city budget.
C. The City of Kent has established procedures for amending the
Comprehensive Plan in Chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code (KCC),
allowing amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the
Comprehensive Plan concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the
City’s budget. As part of these procedures the City Council may hold the
12.a
Packet Pg. 255
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
9
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
1
4
4
3
:
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
I
P
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
)
2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
to the Capital Facilities Element for
2019-2024 Capital Improvements
public hearing instead of the Land Use and Planning Board. KCC
12.02.010.
D. The City of Kent Finance Department has submitted proposed
amendments to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan
to identify a six-year plan for capital improvement projects, including
costs and revenue sources.
E. On September 18, 2018, the City provided the State of
Washington the required 60 day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 of the
City’s proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the
Comprehensive Plan. The 60 day notice period has passed.
F. On September 19, 2018, the City’s SEPA responsible official
issued a SEPA Addendum to existing environmental documents consisting
of the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan Review and Midway Subarea
Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Draft and Final
(ENV-2010-3) and the Downtown Subarea Action Plan Supplemental EIS
Draft and Final (ENV-2012-30). The SEPA Addendum explained that the
proposed amendment would not create unavoidable impacts beyond those
previously identified in the EIS.
G. After providing appropriate public notice, the City Council of
the City of Kent conducted a public hearing on October 16, 2018, to
consider the six-year plan for capital improvements and the requested
amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities Element.
H. On November 20, 2018, the City Council for the City of Kent
approved the Capital Facilities Element amendment to the Kent
12.a
Packet Pg. 256
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
9
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
1
4
4
3
:
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
I
P
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
)
3 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
to the Capital Facilities Element for
2019-2024 Capital Improvements
Comprehensive Plan (CPA-2017-7) to reflect a six-year plan for capital
improvement projects (2019-2024).
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT,
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE
SECTION 1. - Amendment. The City of Kent Comprehensive Plan
and its Capital Facilities Element are hereby amended to reflect a six-year
plan for capital improvement projects (2019-2024), as set forth in Exhibit
“A” attached and incorporated by this reference (CPA-2017-7).
SECTION 2. – Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon
approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are
authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the
correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering;
or references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or
regulations.
SECTION 3. – Severability. If any one or more section, subsection,
or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this
ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 4. – Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and
be in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law.
12.a
Packet Pg. 257
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
9
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
1
4
4
3
:
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
I
P
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
)
4 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
to the Capital Facilities Element for
2019-2024 Capital Improvements
DANA RALPH, MAYOR Date Approved
ATTEST:
KIMBERLEY A. KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted
Date Published
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ARTHUR “PAT” FITZPATRICK, CITY ATTORNEY
12.a
Packet Pg. 258
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
9
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
1
4
4
3
:
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
I
P
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
)
2019-2024
Pg
October 23, 2018
12.b
Packet Pg. 259
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
1
4
4
3
:
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
I
P
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
)
2
20
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
|
CI
T
Y
O
F
K
E
N
T
,
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
12.b
Packet Pg. 260
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
1
4
4
3
:
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
I
P
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
)
20
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
|
CI
T
Y
O
F
K
E
N
T
,
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
3
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
2019-2024 SUMMARY PROJECTS AND FUNDING
Capital project costs for the City’s 2019-2024 capital planning period total $185.7 million and are funded with
City, utility and other resources, as illustrated in the following tables. Additional details follow.
Summary Sources 2019 2020 2021-2024 Total
City Resources 15,873 16,251 49,545 81,669
Utility Resources 27,315 14,185 62,266 103,766
Other Resources 250 0 0 250
Total - in thousands 43,438 30,436 111,811 185,685
Summary Costs 2019 2020 2021-2024 Total
General Government 5,385 4,550 6,200 16,135
Parks, Rec & Comm Services 3,671 4,663 13,531 21,865
Transportation 7,067 7,038 29,814 43,919
Utilities 27,315 14,185 62,266 103,766
Total - in thousands 43,438 30,436 111,811 185,685
City Resources
44%
Utility
Resources
56%
Sources of Funds
General
Government
9%
Parks, Rec &
Comm Services
15%
Transportation
23%
Utilities
56%
Projects by Category
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
12.b
Packet Pg. 261
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
1
4
4
3
:
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
I
P
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
)
4
20
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
|
CI
T
Y
O
F
K
E
N
T
,
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
OPERATING IMPACT OF MAJOR CIP PROJECTS
The impact of a capital project on the operating budget is a key factor in considering the inclusion of a project
in the six-year plan. The operating costs of a project, and any savings resulting from the project, are captured
in the Operating Budget.
SOURCES OF FUNDS—in thousands
SO
U
R
C
E
S
O
F
F
U
N
D
S
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total
Sources of Funds
City Resources 15,873 16,251 12,549 12,331 12,380 12,285 81,669
Utility Resources 27,315 14,185 14,715 15,669 16,245 15,637 103,766
Other Resources 250 - - - - - 250
Total Sources of Funds 43,438 30,436 27,264 28,000 28,625 27,922 185,685
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total
City Resources
accesso ShoWare Fund 299 - - - - - 299
Business & Occupation Tax 7,041 6,994 7,445 7,415 7,385 7,355 43,635
CRF General 5,086 6,050 1,750 1,650 1,650 1,550 17,736
CRF REET 2 341 369 319 218 286 308 1,841
Golf Fund 80 1,294 - - - - 1,374
Sale of Land (1,500) (1,500)
Solid Waste Utility Tax 3,026 3,044 3,035 3,048 3,059 3,072 18,284
Total City Resources 15,873 16,251 12,549 12,331 12,380 12,285 81,669
Utility Resources
Drainage Revenues 5,491 5,371 5,605 5,957 5,944 5,925 34,293
Drainage Fund Balance 6,000 - - - - - 6,000
Sewer Revenues 2,705 3,187 3,177 3,169 3,153 3,140 18,531
Water Revenues 5,619 5,627 5,933 6,543 7,148 6,572 37,442
Water Fund Balance 7,500 - - - - - 7,500
Total Utility Resources 27,315 14,185 14,715 15,669 16,245 15,637 103,766
Other Resources
KC Levy 250 - - - - - 250
Total Other Resources 250 - - - - - 250
Total Sources of Funds 43,438 30,436 27,264 28,000 28,625 27,922 185,685
12.b
Packet Pg. 262
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
1
4
4
3
:
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
I
P
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
)
20
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
|
CI
T
Y
O
F
K
E
N
T
,
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
5
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SUMMARY BY SOURCE 2019-2024
2019-20 SOURCES BY TYPE
accesso ShoWare
0.4%
Business &
Occupation Tax
18%
CRF General
14%
CRF REET 2
0.9%
Golf Fund
1.8%
Sale of Land
2%
Solid Waste Utility
Tax
8%
Drainage
Revenues
14%
Drainage Fund
Balance
8%
Sewer Revenues
8%
Water Revenues
15%
Water Fund
Balance
10%
Other
5%
-
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
$ in Thousands
City Resources Utility Resources Other Resources
SO
U
R
C
E
S
O
F
F
U
N
D
S
12.b
Packet Pg. 263
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
1
4
4
3
:
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
I
P
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
)
6
20
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
|
CI
T
Y
O
F
K
E
N
T
,
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECTS—in thousands
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
B
Y
C
A
T
E
G
O
R
Y
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total
Projects
General Government 5,385 4,550 1,550 1,550 1,550 1,550 16,135
Parks, Rec & Comm Services 3,671 4,663 3,519 3,318 3,386 3,308 21,865
Transportation 7,067 7,038 7,480 7,463 7,444 7,427 43,919
Utilities 27,315 14,185 14,715 15,669 16,245 15,637 103,766
Total Projects 43,438 30,436 27,264 28,000 28,625 27,922 185,685
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total
General Government
accesso ShoWare Center 599$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 2,099$
Facilities 2,350 2,000 - - - - 4,350
Fleet 186 - - - - - 186
Technology 2,250 2,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 9,500
Total General Government 5,385 4,550 1,550 1,550 1,550 1,550 16,135
Parks, Rec & Comm Services
Golf 80 1,294 200 100 100 - 1,774
Parks and Recreation 3,591 3,369 3,319 3,218 3,286 3,308 20,091
Total Parks, Rec & Comm Svcs 3,671 4,663 3,519 3,318 3,386 3,308 21,865
Transportation
Site Improvements 7,067 7,038 7,480 7,463 7,444 7,427 43,919
Total Transportation 7,067 7,038 7,480 7,463 7,444 7,427 43,919
Utilities
Water Supply & Distribution 2,705 3,187 3,177 3,169 3,153 3,140 18,531
Sewer 11,491 5,371 5,605 5,957 5,944 5,925 40,293
Stormwater Management 13,119 5,627 5,933 6,543 7,148 6,572 44,942
Total Utilities 27,315 14,185 14,715 15,669 16,245 15,637 103,766
Total Projects 43,438$ 30,436$ 27,264$ 28,000$ 28,625$ 27,922$ 185,685$
12.b
Packet Pg. 264
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
1
4
4
3
:
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
I
P
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
)
20
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
|
CI
T
Y
O
F
K
E
N
T
,
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
7
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SUMMARY BY CATEGORY 2019-2024
2019-20 BY CATEGORY FUNCTION
-
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
$ in Thousands
General Government Parks, Rec & Comm Services Transportation Utilities
accesso ShoWare
Center
1%
Facilities
6%
Fleet
0%
Technology
6%
Golf
2%
Parks and
Recreation
10%
Site Improvements
19%
Water Supply &
Distribution
8%
Sewer
23%
Stormwater
Management
25%
Other
3%
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
B
Y
C
A
T
E
G
O
R
Y
12.b
Packet Pg. 265
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
1
4
4
3
:
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
I
P
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
)
8
20
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
|
CI
T
Y
O
F
K
E
N
T
,
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
GENERAL GOVERNMENT—in thousands
GE
N
E
R
A
L
G
O
V
E
R
N
M
E
N
T
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total
Sources of Funds
CRF General 5,086$ 4,550$ 1,550$ 1,550$ 1,550$ 1,550$ 15,836$
accesso ShoWare Fund Balance 299 299
Total Sources of Funds 5,385 4,550 1,550 1,550 1,550 1,550 16,135
Projects
Facilities
City Buildings 2,000 2,000 4,000
City Hall Patio Repairs 200 200
Security Fence at Corrections/Court 150 - - - - - 150
Total Facilities Projects 2,350 2,000 - - - - 4,350
Fleet
Fleet Vehicle Lifts 186 - - - - - 186
Total Fleet 186 - - - - - 186
accesso ShoWare Center
Building Extension for Storage 100 100
Carpet (Admin) 23 23
Carpet (Suite Level) 110 110
Carpet (T-Birds) 35 35
Club Tables 40 40
Concession Stand Rebranding 75 75
Dehumidification Unit 2 Repair 60 60
Interior/Exterior Trash Cans & Recycle Bins 50 50
Magnetometer Walk through Metal Detectors 90 90
Plaza Audio 10 10
Refrigerator Freezer for Kitchen 50 50
Roof Door 6 6
Scorebord Front End Control Equipment 80 80
Show Power Step Down Transformer 30 30
Utility Cart Repair 20 20
Wi Fi 120 120
Unallocated - - 300 300 300 300 1,200
Total accesso ShoWare Center 599$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 2,099$
12.b
Packet Pg. 266
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
1
4
4
3
:
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
I
P
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
)
20
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
|
CI
T
Y
O
F
K
E
N
T
,
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
9
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
GENERAL GOVERNMENT CONTINUED—in thousands
GE
N
E
R
A
L
G
O
V
E
R
N
M
E
N
T
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total
Technology
HLC 17-18 Mobile Router Replacement -$ -$ 20$ 22$ 24$ 27$ 93$
HLC 17-18 Server Replacement 50 50 60 60 67 73 360
HLC 17-18 Telephony 75 100 50 53 58 64 400
HLC 17-18 Wireless Infrastructure Refresh 20 22 24 27 93
HLC 21-24 Connected Conference Room 25 28 30 33 116
HLC16-18 Data Center 75 75 80 90 100 110 530
HLC16-18 Network Refresh 400 50 60 63 69 642
HLC16-18 Security 100 200 110 120 130 150 810
HLC16-18 Storage Expansion 30 33 36 40 139
HLC16-18 UPS 25 30 30 33 37 155
HLC16-18 Virtualization Infrastructure Refresh 75 82 91 100 348
SLC18-20 Admin Sys Repl Rsrvs 28 84 40 30 30 30 241
SLC18-21 PD Sys Repl Reserves 110 334 130 130 130 100 934
SLC18-21 Law Sys Repl Reserves 28 84 40 30 30 30 241
SLC18-22 HR Sys Repl Reserves 55 167 70 70 64 50 476
SLC18-23 Fin Sys Repl Reserves 83 251 90 90 70 70 653
SLC18-26 PW Sys Repl Reserves 55 84 70 70 60 50 389
SLC18-26 PRCS Sys Repl Resrvs 28 167 40 30 30 30 325
SLC18-27 Court Sys Repl Resrvs 28 84 40 30 30 30 241
SLC18-27 ECD Sys Repl Reserves 55 167 70 70 60 50 472
SLC18-28 Clerk Sys Repl Resrvs 55 167 70 70 60 50 472
SLC18-29 IT Sys Repl Reserves 28 84 40 30 30 30 241
ALPR/Automated License Plate Reader 95 95
Jail Camera Replacement 242 242
Multimedia Asset Management (MAM) 75 75
Traffic Network Upgrade 400 400
Intrusion Detection/Prevention System 150 150
Collaboration Tool Procurement 50 50
Network Pen Testing 80 80
City Services Kiosk (pilot) 36 - - - - - 36
Total Technology Projects 2,250 2,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 9,500
Total General Government Projects 5,385$ 4,550$ 1,550$ 1,550$ 1,550$ 1,550$ 16,135$
12.b
Packet Pg. 267
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
1
4
4
3
:
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
I
P
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
)
10
20
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
|
CI
T
Y
O
F
K
E
N
T
,
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES—in thousands
PA
R
K
S
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total
Sources of Funds
CRF REET2 341$ 369$ 319$ 218$ 286$ 308$ 1,841$
B&O Square Footage 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 18,000
King County Levy 250 250
Golf Fund Balance 80 1,294 1,374
CRF General 1,500 200 100 100 1,900
Sale of Land (1,500) (1,500)
Total Sources of Funds 3,671 4,663 3,519 3,318 3,386 3,308 21,865
Projects
Golf Projects
Golf Clubhouse Renovations 40 34 74
Golf Course Accessories 100 100
Golf Course Renovations/Improvements 510 100 100 100 810
Golf Driving Range Renovations 40 40
Golf Irrigation System Upgrades - 650 100 - - - 750
Total Golf Projects 80 1,294 200 100 100 - 1,774
Parks and Recreation Projects
Clark Lake Park Development 240th 200 1,768 1,968
Place Making - Burlington/Kaibara 300 300
Place-Making - Kherson Urban Play 250 250
Place-Making - Meeker /Town Square Plaza 300 300
Garrison Creek Park Renovation 400 400
Gateways 50 50
GR Trail/Van Doren's Park Design 900 900
Hogan Park at Russell Road Reno. Ph II 500 500
Huse/Panther Lake Community Park 200 200
KLVT - Old Fishing Hole Improvements 300 300
KVLT - Boeing Rock Improvements 300 300
KVLT - Downey 250 250
KVLT - Interurban Trail, 3 Friends Fishing Hole 500 500
KVLT - Milwaukee 2 279 279
Lake Fenwick Park Renovation - Phase II 2,000 2,000
Masterplans 40 40 40 40 40 40 240
Mill Creek Earthworks Renovation 1,100 2,000 3,100
Mill Creek Trail Renovation 678 500 1,178
Morrill Meadows Expansion Phase 2 1,150 1,150
NPRP - Chestnut Ridge Playground 166 166
NPRP - Salt Air Vista 201 201
NPRP - Scenic Hill Park Renovation 246 246
Parks Land Acquisition 500 500 500 500 2,000
Service Club Park Loop Trail 250 250
Springwood Park Renovation - 2,063 1,000 - - - 3,063
Total Parks and Recreation Projects 3,591 3,369 3,319 3,218 3,286 3,308 20,091
Total Projects 3,671$ 4,663$ 3,519$ 3,318$ 3,386$ 3,308$ 21,865$
12.b
Packet Pg. 268
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
1
4
4
3
:
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
I
P
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
)
20
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
|
CI
T
Y
O
F
K
E
N
T
,
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
11
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
TR
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
TRANSPORTATION—in thousands
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total
Sources of Funds
Solid Waste Utility Tax 3,026$ 3,044$ 3,035$ 3,048$ 3,059$ 3,072$ 18,284$
Business & Occupation Tax 4,041 3,994 4,445 4,415 4,385 4,355 25,635
Total Sources of Funds 7,067 7,038 7,480 7,463 7,444 7,427 43,919
Projects
B&O In-house Overlays 250 250 250 250 250 250 1,500
B&O Street Contracted 1,284 2,944 3,505 3,598 3,560 3,523 18,414
Panther Lake Signal System Integration 400 400
Residential Street Contracted 2,776 2,794 3,145 3,165 3,184 3,204 18,268
Residential Street Capital 250 250 250 250 250 250 1,500
Safe Route to School Meridian Elementary 100 100
Street Lights - New 200 200 200 200 200 200 1,200
Traffic Cameras - New (Capital)130 130
Transportation Master Plan 300 200 500
Willis Street and 4th Roundabout 1,907 1,907
Total Projects 7,067$ 7,038$ 7,480$ 7,463$ 7,444$ 7,427$ 43,919$
12.b
Packet Pg. 269
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
1
4
4
3
:
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
I
P
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
)
12
20
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
|
CI
T
Y
O
F
K
E
N
T
,
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
UTILITIES—in thousands
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total
Sources of Funds
Water Revenues 5,619$ 5,627$ 5,933$ 6,543$ 7,148$ 6,572$ 37,442$
Use of Water Fund Balance 7,500 7,500
Sewer Revenues 2,705 3,187 3,177 3,169 3,153 3,140 18,531
Drainage Revenues 5,491 5,371 5,605 5,957 5,944 5,925 34,293
Use of Drainage Fund Balance 6,000 6,000
Total Sources of Funds 27,315 14,185 14,715 15,669 16,245 15,637 103,766
Projects
Water Supply & Distribution
224th St Phase II (224th-228th (88th-94th) 450 450
Clark Springs Transmission Main Evaluation 10 10
Clark Springs Well 12 12
E. Hill Pressure Zone 1,500 1,000 2,000 4,500
Emergency Power 212th 200 200
Garrison O'Brien Treatment Plant 1,000 1,000
Guiberson Reservior Repair 1,500 1,000 3,000 4,500 10,000
Habitat Conservation Plan Implementation 1,222 413 420 242 250 256 2,803
Kent Springs Well Rehab 75 75
Landsburg Mine 790 804 466 1,063 3,123
Misc Water Improvements 500 500 500 500 500 500 3,000
Pump Station #3 Replacement 400 400
Pump Station #4 Upgrade 500 500
Reservoir Maintenance & Improvements 100 100
Security Improvements on Water Sites 150 50 28 50 50 31 359
Tacoma Pipeline 50 50 50 50 50 50 300
Water Generators 1,000 1,000
Water Main Repairs/Replacements 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6,000
Water System PLC Upgrades 35 35 35 35 35 35 210
Wellhead Protection 200 200 200 200 200 200 1,200
West Hill Reservoir 8,200 - - 500 1,000 - 9,700
Total Water Supply & Distribution 13,119 5,627 5,933 6,543 7,148 6,572 44,942
Sewer
Comprehensive Sewer Plan 500 500
Derbyshire 500 2,677 3,177
Linda Heights Pump Station 1,205 1,205
Misc. Pump Station Replacements 1,000 1,000 1,000 3,000
Misc. Sewer 500 500 500 500 500 500 3,000
Sewer Main Replacements/Relining 1,669 1,653 1,640 4,962
Skyline Sewer Interceptor 500 2,187 - - - - 2,687
Total Sewer 2,705$ 3,187$ 3,177$ 3,169$ 3,153$ 3,140$ 18,531$
12.b
Packet Pg. 270
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
1
4
4
3
:
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
I
P
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
)
20
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
|
CI
T
Y
O
F
K
E
N
T
,
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
13
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
UTILITIES CONTINUED—in thousands
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total
Stormwater Management
132nd Ave Drainage 100$ 100$
144th Ave Drainage Improvements - 250 250 2,000 2,500
224th Street Phase I 300 300
228th Joint Utility Trench 1,000 1,000
BNSF Grade Separation - Drainage 500 500
County Road 8 600 200 800
Downey Farmstead 400 250 650
Drainage Master Plan 500 500 300 1,300
Frager Rd Levee 300 200 200 700
GRNRA Maint. Improvements 250 1,000 2,000 3,250
GRNRA Pump Station 250 1,000 1,000 1,000 4,375 7,625
GRNRA S Pump Station 3,000 3,000
Kent Airport Levee 200 100 100 400
Lake Fenwick Aeration 300 300
Lower Russell Road Levee 250 250 500
Mill Creek @ 76th Ave Flood Protection 191 1,000 1,191
Mill/Garrison/Spring/Grn. River & Tribs 250 250
Milwaukee II Levee 200 100 300
Misc Drainage 1,000 300 300 300 300 300 2,500
Misc. Environmental 1,000 1,000
N Fork Meridian Valley Culvert 100 300 1,000 1,400
Pipe replacements/roadway improvements - 821 500 907 644 1,000 3,872
S 224th St. Phase 2 500 500
Upper MIll Creek Dam 500 500
Vactor Site Improvements 150 150
Valley Channel Rehabilitation 500 500 1,705 2,500 5,205
Valley Creek System CLOMR 400 100 - - - - 500
Total Stormwater Management 11,491 5,371 5,605 5,957 5,944 5,925 40,293
Total Utilities Projects 27,315$ 14,185$ 14,715$ 15,669$ 16,245$ 15,637$ 103,766$
12.b
Packet Pg. 271
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
1
4
4
3
:
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
I
P
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
)
ECONOMIC and COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Kurt Hanson, Director
PTANNING SERVICES
Erin George, AICP, Current Planning Manager
Phone:253-856-5454
Fax: 253-856-6454KENT
WASHTNGToN Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S
Kent, WA 98032-5895
CITY OF KENT
ADDENDUM TO THE KENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
ENVIRON M ENTAL IM PACT STATEM ENT
Responsible Official: Erin George, AICP Staff Contact: Hayley Bonsteel, AICP
SCOPE
The City of Kent has completed environmental analysis, pursuant to the State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), for an amendment of the Capital Facilities
Element of the Comprehensive Plan to include the City's 2Ot8-2024 Capital
Improvement Program (CIP). This amendment to the Capital Facilities
Element is occurring concurrently with the adoption of the City's 20L9-20
biennial budget as provided by RCW 36.704.130.
The GMA requires cities and counties to approve and maintain a six (6) year
capital facilities plan that will finance such capital facilities within projected
funding capacities and clearly identifies sources of public money for such
purposes. Kent's biennial budget document and six-year CIP fulfill the GMA
requirement for facilities planning. In addition, these documents serve as a
foundation for the city's fiscal management and eligibility for grants and
loans. The CIP, biennial budget and Capital Facilities Element of the
Comprehensive Plan provide coordination among the city's many plans for
capital improvements and guide and implement the provisions for adequate
public services and facilities.
The six-year CIP is a funding mechanism to implement projects and
programs identified in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the Capital
Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan contains goals and policies
related to the provision and maintenance of public services and capital
facilities which are necessary to support the projected growth over the next
twenty (20) years. The goals and policies of the Capital Facilities Element are
consistent with the Land Use, Transportation and Parks and Recreation
Elements.
The City of Kent Comprehensive Plan Review and Midway Subarea Planned
Action Environmental Impact Statement EIS, draft and final, as well as the
Downtown Subarea Action Plan Planned Action Supplemental EIS, draft and
final, evaluated the growth potential as identified in the City's Comprehensive
Plan. The adoption of the six-year CIP concurrently with the city's biennial
budget is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan EIS and Downtown
Subarea Action Plan Supplemental EIS analyses as the types of projects and
12.c
Packet Pg. 272
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
P
l
a
n
E
I
S
_
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
d
d
e
n
d
u
m
(
1
4
4
3
:
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
I
P
Comprehensive Plan EIS - Addendum
Capital Improvement Program 2079-2024
programs identified in the CIP are spec¡fically related to the growth
projections in the Comprehensive Plan, EIS and SEIS,
SEPA Colvpr-rRrucr
On February L3,2OtO, the City of Kent issued a Determination of
Significance (DS) and Notice of Scoping for the Midway Subarea Plan and
Planned Action Ordinance as well as different concepts for growth elsewhere
in the Kent Planning Area (ENV-2010-3). The City solicited public comment
on the scope of the DEIS during the comment period as well as through a
February 22, 2010 open house meeting. A Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (DEIS) was issued on October 22, 2OL0 for the Draft Midway
Subarea Plan and Draft Planned Action Ordinance, as well as a Proposal for
alternative growth strategies at a programmatic level for the Kent Planning
Area. The DEIS was distributed to City Council and Land Use & Planning
Board members, adjacent jurisdictions, affected agencies and other parties of
interest. After comments on the DEIS were solicited and reviewed, a Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) was issued and distributed on
Scptcmbcr 1, 2011.
On October 9, 20t2, the City of Kent issued a Determination of Significance
(DS) and Notice of Scoping for the Downtown Subarea Action Plan Update
(ENV-2012-30). The City solicited public comment on the scope of the DEIS
during the comment period, as well as through an open house meeting. A
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (DSEIS) was issued on
June 21, 2OL3 for the Draft Downtown Subarea Action Plan, amendments of
Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Zoning Districts maps, development
regulations, Planned Action and Infill Exemption Ordinances, as well as
alternative growth strategies at a programmatic level for the Kent Planning
Area and Midway Subarea. The DSEIS was distributed to City Council and
Land Use & Planning Board members, adjacent jurisdictions, affected
agencies and other parties of interest. After comments on the DSEIS were
solicited and reviewed, a Final Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement (FSEIS) was issued and distributed on October 4,2013.
This Addendum to the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan Review and Midway
Subarea Planned Action EIS and Downtown Subarea Action Plan Planned
Action Supplemental EIS evaluates the adoption of the six-year CIP. No
additional impacts are identified since the CIP implements projects and
programs within the scope of impacts evaluated in the EIS and SEIS.
SrRI¡I',I erur oF CoNSISTENcY
Future projects associated with the CIP will be subject to and shall be
consistent with the following: City of Kent Comprehensive Plan, the Kent City
Code, International Fire Code, International Building Code, Public Works
Standards and all other applicable laws and ordinances in effect at the time a
complete project permit application is filed.
Page 2 of 5
12.c
Packet Pg. 273
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
P
l
a
n
E
I
S
_
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
d
d
e
n
d
u
m
(
1
4
4
3
:
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
I
P
Comprehensive Plan EIS - Addendum
Capital Improvement Program 2019-2024
EIT¡vIROru¡¡eNTAL REVIEW - BAcKGRoUND
The City of Kent has followed the process of phased environmental review asit undertakes actions to implement the Comprehensive Plan. The State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and rules established for the act, WAC 197-
11, outline procedures for the use of existing environmental documents and
preparing addenda to environmental decisions.
Nonproject Documents An EIS prepared for a comprehensive plan,
development regulation , or other broad based policy documents are
considered "non-project," or programmatic in nature (see WAC t97-tL-704).
These are distinguished from EISs or environmental documents prepared for
specific project actions, such as a building permit or a road construction
project. The purpose of a non-project EIS is to analyze proposed alternatives
and to provide environmental consideration and mitígation prior to adoption
of an alternative. It is also a document that discloses the process used in
evaluating alternatives to decision-makers and citizens.
Phased Review - SEPA rules allow environmental review to be phased so that
review coincides with meaningful points in the planning and decision-making
process (WAC L97-L1-060(5)). Broader environmental documents may be
followed by narrower documents that incorporate general discussion by
reference and concentrate solely on issues specific to that proposal. SEPA
rules also clearly state that agencies shall use a variety of mechanisms,
including addenda, adoption and incorporation by reference, to avoid
duplication and excess paperwork. Future projects identified and associated
with the implementation of the Capital Improvement Program may require
individual and separate environmental review, pursuant to SEPA. Such
review will occur when a specific project is identified.
Prior Environmental Documents The City of Kent issued a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the City of Kent Comprehensive
Plan Review and Midway Subarea Planned Action on October 22, 2010
(#ENV-2010-3). The DEIS analyzed alternative growth strategies at a
programmatic level for the Kent Planning Area, as well as adoption of the
Midway Subarea Plan and a planned action ordinance to cover a portion of
the Midway Subarea, and recommended mitigation measures, which were
used in preparing subarea plan policies. A Final Environmental Impact
Statement (FEIS) was issued on September 1, ZOLL, and the Midway
Subarea Plan, Land Use Plan and Zoning Districts Map amendments, and
development regulations were adopted by the City Council on December 13,
20tt.
The City of Kent issued a Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement (DSEIS) for the City of Kent Downtown Subarea Action Plan
Planned Action on June 21, 20L3 (#ENV-2012-30). The DSEIS analyzed
alternative growth strategies for the Downtown Subarea, adoption of the
Downtown Subarea Action Plan, amendments of Comprehensive Plan Land
Use and Zoning District maps, development regulations, Planned Action and
Infill Exemption Ordinances, as well as alternative growth strategies at a
Page 3 of 5
12.c
Packet Pg. 274
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
P
l
a
n
E
I
S
_
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
d
d
e
n
d
u
m
(
1
4
4
3
:
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
I
P
Comprehensive Plan EIS - Addendum
Capital Improvement Program 2Ot9-2024
programmatic level for the Kent Planning Area and Midway Subarea. The
DSEIS also recommended mitigation measures, which were used in preparing
subarea plan policies. A Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement
(FSEIS) was issued on October 4, 2OL3, and the Downtown Subarea Action
Plan, amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Zoning Districts
maps, and amendments to development regulations within the General
Commercial-Mixed Use zoning district were adopted by the City Council on
November L9, 2OL3. The City Council adopted the Downtown Subarea
Planned Action and Infill Exemption Ordinances on December 10, 2013.
Scope of Addendum - As outlined in the SEPA rules, the purpose of an
addendum is to provide environmental analysis with respect to the described
actions. This analysis builds upon the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan
Review and Midway Subarea Planned Action EIS and the City of Kent
Downtown Subarea Action Plan Planned Action SEIS but does not
substantially change the identified impacts and analyses; therefore it is
prudent to utilize the addendum process as outlined in WAC-197-11-
600(a)(c).
EruvrRorrrv rNTAL ELEMENTS
All environmental elements were adequately addressed within the
parameters of the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan Review and Midway
Subarea Planned Action EIS, draft and final, and the Downtown Subarea
Action Plan Planned Action SEIS, draft and final. Further, subsequent
"project" actions would require the submittal of separate environmental
checklists, pursuant to SEPA, which will be analyzed for consistency with the
original mitigating conditions and may require new mitigation based upon
site-specific cond itions.
The adoption of the six-year CIP implements goals and policies identified in
the City's Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically,
the CIP implements the following:
Goal CF-7 - As the City of Kent continues to grow and develop, ensure that
an adequate supply and range of public services and capital facilities are
available to provide satisfactory standards of public health, safety, and
quality of life.
Policy CF-7.2 - Ensure that public services and capital facilities needs are
addressed in updates to Capital Facilities Plans and Capital Improvement
Programs, and development regulations as appropriate.
Policy CF-7.3 To ensure financial feasibility, provide needed public
services and facilities that the City has the ability to fund, or that the City
has the authority to require others to provide.
Goal CF-10 Ensure that appropriate funding sources are available to
acquire or bond for the provision of needed public services and facilities.
Page 4 of 5
12.c
Packet Pg. 275
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
P
l
a
n
E
I
S
_
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
d
d
e
n
d
u
m
(
1
4
4
3
:
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
I
P
Comprehensive Plan EIS - Addendum
Capital Improvement Program 2079-2024
SuvvRRv AND RECoMMENDATToN
Suu¡rRRv
Kent City Code section 11.03.510 identifies plans and policies from which the
City may draw substant¡ve mitigation under the State Environmental Policy
Act. This nonproject act¡on has been evaluated in light of those substantive
plans and policies as well as within the overall analysis completed for the
City's Comprehensive Plan Review and Midway Subarea Planned Action EIS
and Downtown Subarea Action Plan Planned Action SEIS.
Drctstorrr
The City of Kent Comprehensive Plan Review and Midway Subarea Planned
Action EIS, draft and final, and the City of Kent Downtown Subarea Action
Plan Planned Action SEIS, draft and final, provided analyses with regard to
the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan elements, goals and policies.
This includes the implementation of the Capital Facilities Element and Capital
Improvement Programs. The City has reviewed the 2019-2024 CIP and has
found it to be consistent with the range, types and magnitude of impacts and
corresponding mitigation outlined in the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan
Review and Midway Subarea Planned Action EIS and the City of Kent
Downtown Subarea Action Plan Planned Action SEIS. The adoption of the six-
year CIP does not substantially change any identified related impacts in the
EIS or SEIS.
This analysis and subsequent addendum did not identify any new significant
impacts associated with the adoption of the 2OL9-2024 CIP. Therefore, this
addendum, combined with the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan Review and
Midway Subarea Planned Action EIS and the City of Kent Downtown Subarea
Action Plan Planned Action SEIS adequately evaluate potential adverse
environmental impacts and provide appropriate mitigation for this nonproject
action. Based upon this analysis, a separate threshold determination is not
required. This document and corresponding environmental record may be
utilized in the future in conjunction with environmental review for future
projects identified in the CIP in accordance with the guidelines provided by
WAC T97-LL.
Dated: September 19, 2018 Signature:
Erin George, AICP, Respo ible Official
HB:sm S:\Perm¡t\Plan\COMP_PLAN_AMENDMENTS\2018\City 6-Year CIP\CIP_SEPA_Addendum2OL9-2024.doc
Page 5 of 5
12.c
Packet Pg. 276
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
P
l
a
n
E
I
S
_
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
d
d
e
n
d
u
m
(
1
4
4
3
:
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
I
P
12.c
Packet Pg. 277
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
-
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
P
l
a
n
E
I
S
_
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
A
d
d
e
n
d
u
m
(
1
4
4
3
:
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
4
C
I
P
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
Derek Matheson, Chief Administrative Officer
220 Fourth Ave S
Kent, WA 98032
256-856-5712
DATE: November 6, 2018
TO: Operations Committee
SUBJECT: Property Tax Levy Ordinance - Recommend
MOTION: Recommend Council adopt the property tax levy ordinance for
the year 2019 of the 2019-2020 biennial budget.
SUMMARY: This ordinance levies a property tax increase of 1.0%, which includes
an increase of 1 percent on property, new construction and adjustments over the
prior year.
BUDGET IMPACT: As described
SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL:
Sustainable Services
ATTACHMENTS:
1. DRAFT ORDINANCE Tax Levied-2019 (PDF)
13
Packet Pg. 278
1 Property Tax Levied (1%)
2019 Budget Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO. ____
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, levying 2018 property
taxes for the 2019 biennial budget for the City of
Kent.
RECITALS
A. Pursuant to RCW 84.55.120 and after providing all
appropriate notice, the City Council held public hearings on September 18,
2018, and October 16, 2018, to consider the City of Kent's budget for
2019, to address the City’s property tax levy to be imposed in 2018 for
collection in 2019, and to review revenues and limit factors.
B. In accordance with RCW 84.55.120, any increase in property
tax revenue other than that resulting from the addition of new
construction and improvements to property, annexations, and any
increase in the value of state-assessed property and the refund fund levy,
requires the adoption of a separate ordinance specifically authorizing the
increase in terms of both dollars and percentage.
C. Pursuant to RCW 84.52.010 and WAC 458-19-020, taxes
shall be levied in specific dollar amounts.
13.a
Packet Pg. 279
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
D
R
A
F
T
O
R
D
I
N
A
N
C
E
T
a
x
L
e
v
i
e
d
-
2
0
1
9
(
1
4
4
4
:
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
T
a
x
L
e
v
y
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
-
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
)
2 Property Tax Levied (1%)
2019 Budget Ordinance
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT,
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE
SECTION 1. – Recitals Incorporated. The foregoing recitals are
incorporated into this ordinance.
SECTION 2. – Property Tax Levied. There is hereby levied against
the assessed value of the property in the City of Kent, Washington, a tax
for the City's 2019 budget in the following amount for the General Fund,
for the purpose of paying the general expenses of municipal government:
Levy per $1,000 of
assessed valuation
Fund (estimated) Dollar Amount
General Fund $1.5006 $30,755,540
This property tax levy represents a 1.0% increase over last year as shown
below.
2019 Regular Property Tax Levy $30,755,540
Less 2018 Regular Property Tax Levy (30,067,316)
Less New Construction Levy (342,560)
Less Refund Levy (44,991)
Property Tax Increase $ 300,673
% Change 1.0%
13.a
Packet Pg. 280
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
D
R
A
F
T
O
R
D
I
N
A
N
C
E
T
a
x
L
e
v
i
e
d
-
2
0
1
9
(
1
4
4
4
:
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
T
a
x
L
e
v
y
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
-
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
)
3 Property Tax Levied (1%)
2019 Budget Ordinance
SECTION 3. - Limitation on Levy. The application of the General
Fund levy shall be consistent with and shall not result in tax revenue in
excess of the limitation imposed by RCW sections 84.55.010 and
84.55.0101.
SECTION 4. - Severability. If any one or more section, subsection,
or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this
ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 5. – Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon
approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are
authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the
correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering;
or references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or
regulations.
SECTION 6. - Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and
be in force January 1, 2019, which is more than five days after its
publication, as provided by law.
DANA RALPH, MAYOR Date Approved
ATTEST:
KIMBERLEY A. KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted
Date Published
13.a
Packet Pg. 281
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
D
R
A
F
T
O
R
D
I
N
A
N
C
E
T
a
x
L
e
v
i
e
d
-
2
0
1
9
(
1
4
4
4
:
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
T
a
x
L
e
v
y
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
-
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
)
4 Property Tax Levied (1%)
2019 Budget Ordinance
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ARTHUR “PAT” FITZPATRICK, CITY ATTORNEY
13.a
Packet Pg. 282
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
D
R
A
F
T
O
R
D
I
N
A
N
C
E
T
a
x
L
e
v
i
e
d
-
2
0
1
9
(
1
4
4
4
:
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
T
a
x
L
e
v
y
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
-
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
)
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
Derek Matheson, Chief Administrative Officer
220 Fourth Ave S
Kent, WA 98032
256-856-5712
DATE: November 6, 2018
TO: Operations Committee
SUBJECT: 2019-2020 Budget Adoption Ordinance - Recomment
MOTION: Recommend Council adopt the 2019-2020 Budget Ordinance.
SUMMARY: This ordinance adopts the final 2019-2020 biennial budget. The total
gross expenditure budget for 2019 is $354,056,300 and 2020 is $322,797,600.
A crosswalk from the Mayor’s Proposed Budget to Council Adopted Budget is
provided in Exhibits A & B attached.
BUDGET IMPACT: As described
SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL:
Sustainable Services
ATTACHMENTS:
1. DRAFT ORDINANCE Budget Adoption-2019-20 (PDF)
2. Budget Adoption Exhibit A (PDF)
3. Budget Adoption Exhibit B (PDF)
14
Packet Pg. 283
1 2019-2020
Biennial Budget Adoption
Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO. ______
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, relating to budgets and
finance and adopting the final 2019-2020 biennial
budget.
RECITALS
A. Tax estimates and the preliminary budget for the City of
Kent, Washington, for the 2019-2020 biennial years have been prepared
and filed as provided by law, and the budget has been printed and
distributed.
B. Notice has been published in the official paper of the City of
Kent setting the time and place for public hearings on the budget. The
notice also stated that all taxpayers calling at the Office of the City Clerk
would be furnished a copy of the 2019-2020 biennial budget.
C. Public hearings were held on September 18, 2018, and
October 16, 2018.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT,
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
14.a
Packet Pg. 284
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
D
R
A
F
T
O
R
D
I
N
A
N
C
E
B
u
d
g
e
t
A
d
o
p
t
i
o
n
-
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
(
1
4
4
5
:
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
0
B
u
d
g
e
t
A
d
o
p
t
i
o
n
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
-
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
)
2 2019-2020
Biennial Budget Adoption
Ordinance
ORDINANCE
SECTION 1. – Budget Adoption. Pursuant to RCW 35A.34.120, the
budget for the 2019-2020 biennium, as summarized in Exhibit “A” and as
set forth in the 2019-2020 biennial Preliminary Comprehensive Budget,
which is on file with the city clerk and which is amended by Exhibit “B,” all
of which are incorporated into this ordinance by this reference, is hereby
adopted in the amounts and for the purposes established in that budget as
the final budget for the City’s 2019-2020 biennium.
SECTION 2. - Transmittal. The finance director shall transmit a
complete copy of the final adopted budget to the Division of Municipal
Corporations in the Office of the State Auditor and to the Association of
Washington Cities.
SECTION 3. – Budget Administration. City administration shall
administer the biennial budget and may authorize expenditures,
appropriations, and transfers pursuant to RCW 35A.34.200 and as
otherwise provided by law.
SECTION 4. - Severability. If any one or more section, subsection,
or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this
ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 5. – Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon
approval of the city attorney, the clerk and the code reviser are authorized
to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction
of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering or lettering;
or references to other local, state, or federal laws, code, or regulations.
14.a
Packet Pg. 285
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
D
R
A
F
T
O
R
D
I
N
A
N
C
E
B
u
d
g
e
t
A
d
o
p
t
i
o
n
-
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
(
1
4
4
5
:
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
0
B
u
d
g
e
t
A
d
o
p
t
i
o
n
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
-
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
)
3 2019-2020
Biennial Budget Adoption
Ordinance
SECTION 6. - Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and
be in force January 1, 2019, which is more than five days after its
publication, as provided by law.
DANA RALPH, MAYOR Date Approved
ATTEST:
KIMBERLEY A. KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted
Date Published
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ARTHUR “PAT” FITZPATRICK, CITY ATTORNEY
14.a
Packet Pg. 286
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
D
R
A
F
T
O
R
D
I
N
A
N
C
E
B
u
d
g
e
t
A
d
o
p
t
i
o
n
-
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
(
1
4
4
5
:
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
0
B
u
d
g
e
t
A
d
o
p
t
i
o
n
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
-
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
)
2019 Proposed 2020 Proposed
Expenditures Expenditures
Governmental Funds
General Fund 107,690,250 106,361,540
Special Revenue Funds
Street Operating Fund 17,645,420 18,025,920
LEOFF1 Retiree Benefits Fund 1,423,000 1,449,710
Lodging Tax Fund 291,190 294,400
Youth / Teen Fund 957,730 956,010
Capital Resources Fund 20,591,850 18,152,000
Criminal Justice Fund 5,869,960 6,057,350
Housing and Community Dev Fund 1,175,190 1,175,190
City Arts Program Fund 112,670 108,100
ShoWare Operating Fund 1,423,790 1,124,830
Debt Service Funds
Non-Voted Debt Service Fund 9,764,390 8,641,810
Special Assessments Fund 1,119,460 784,160
Capital Projects Funds
Street Capital Projects Fund 7,103,340 6,869,980
Parks Capital Projects Fund 3,341,000 3,369,000
Other Capital Projects Fund 56,610 42,780
Technology Capital Projects Fund 2,250,000 2,250,000
Facilities Capital Projects Fund 2,350,000 2,000,000
Proprietary Funds
Enterprise Funds
Water Fund 49,342,500 33,601,390
Sewer Fund 32,168,150 32,411,620
Drainage Fund 43,380,150 31,366,120
Solid Waste Fund 600,350 622,420
Golf Complex Fund 3,050,790 5,532,110
Internal Service Funds
Fleet Services Fund 7,930,660 6,088,490
Central Services Fund
Central Stores 387,290 395,040
Information Technology 9,079,150 9,658,590
Facilities Fund 5,838,450 5,867,350
Insurance Fund
Unemployment 173,610 174,510
Workers Compensation 1,456,980 1,469,450
Health and Employee Wellness 14,898,160 15,345,100
Liability Insurance 2,017,600 2,036,120
Property Insurance 566,610 566,510
Total Gross Budget 354,056,300 322,797,600
2019-20 Biennial Budget
Exhibit A
14.b
Packet Pg. 287
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
B
u
d
g
e
t
A
d
o
p
t
i
o
n
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
(
1
4
4
5
:
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
0
B
u
d
g
e
t
A
d
o
p
t
i
o
n
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
-
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
)
2019 2019 2020 2020
Revenues Expenditures Revenues Expenditures
Governmental Funds
General Fund 107,718,120 107,718,120 106,315,370 106,315,370
Parking Enf Officer .75FTE to 1.0FTE 14,000 15,730 16,170 16,170
Finance Admin Asst 2 (1.0)FTE (41,870)(73,600)
Communications Training 30,000 30,000 30,000
107,690,250 107,690,250 106,361,540 106,361,540
Special Revenue Funds
Street Operating Fund 17,645,420 17,645,420 18,025,920 18,025,920
LEOFF1 Retiree Benefits Fund 1,179,590 1,423,000 1,202,950 1,449,710
Lodging Tax Fund 294,830 291,190 300,670 294,400
Youth / Teen Fund 957,730 957,730 956,010 956,010
Capital Resources Fund 16,194,310 20,591,850 15,529,980 18,152,000
Criminal Justice Fund 6,300,130 5,869,960 6,500,700 6,057,350
Housing and Community Dev Fund 1,175,190 1,175,190 1,175,190 1,175,190
City Arts Program Fund 112,670 112,670 108,100 108,100
ShoWare Operating Fund 1,150,000 1,423,790 1,150,000 1,124,830
Debt Service Funds
Non-Voted Debt Service Fund 10,227,890 9,764,390 9,105,570 8,641,810
Special Assessments Fund 1,305,380 1,119,460 793,180 784,160
Capital Projects Funds
Street Capital Projects Fund 7,103,340 7,103,340 6,869,980 6,869,980
Parks Capital Projects Fund 3,341,000 3,341,000 3,369,000 3,369,000
Other Capital Projects Fund 1,534,060 56,610 1,570,870 42,780
Technology Capital Projects Fund 2,250,000 2,250,000 2,250,000 2,250,000
Facilities Capital Projects Fund 2,350,000 2,350,000 2,000,000 2,000,000
Proprietary Funds
Enterprise Funds
Water Fund 42,708,060 49,342,500 35,284,880 33,601,390
Sewer Fund 32,320,310 32,168,150 32,579,660 32,411,620
Drainage Fund 37,045,700 43,380,150 32,083,870 31,366,120
Solid Waste Fund 618,810 600,350 631,190 622,420
Golf Complex Fund 2,899,210 3,050,790 5,584,990 5,532,110
Internal Service Funds
Fleet Services Fund 8,643,070 7,930,660 5,115,460 6,088,490
Central Services Fund
Central Stores 447,090 387,290 456,010 395,040
Information Technology 9,138,700 9,079,150 8,657,300 9,658,590
Facilities Fund 5,754,880 5,838,450 5,775,070 5,867,350
Insurance Fund
Unemployment 121,700 173,610 121,700 174,510
Workers Compensation 1,094,000 1,456,980 1,094,000 1,469,450
Health and Employee Wellness 15,052,030 14,898,160 15,789,180 15,345,100
Liability Insurance 1,810,690 2,017,600 2,171,640 2,036,120
Property Insurance 565,920 566,610 565,920 566,510
Total Gross Budget 339,031,960 354,056,300 323,180,530 322,797,600
2019-20 Biennial Budget
Exhibit B
14.c
Packet Pg. 288
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
B
u
d
g
e
t
A
d
o
p
t
i
o
n
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
B
(
1
4
4
5
:
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
0
B
u
d
g
e
t
A
d
o
p
t
i
o
n
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
-
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
)