HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Committees - Operations Committee - 12/04/2018 (2)
Unless otherwise noted, the Operations Committee meets at 4 p.m. on the first and third
Tuesday of each month in Kent City Hall, Council Chambers East, 220 Fourth Avenue South,
Kent, WA 98032.
For additional information please contact Cathie Everett at 253-856-5705, or via email at
CEverett@KentWA.gov.
Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City Clerk’s Office at
253-856-5725 in advance. For TDD relay service call Washington Telecommunications Relay
Service at 7-1-1.
Operations Committee
Agenda
Chair - Les Thomas
Bill Boyce– Dennis Higgins
Tuesday, December 4, 2018
4:00 p.m.
Item Description Action Speaker Time
1. Call to Order Chair 01 MIN.
2. Roll Call Chair 01 MIN.
3. Changes to the Agenda Chair 01 MIN.
4. Approval of November 20, 2018
Minutes
YES Chair 05 MIN.
5. Approval of Check Summary
Report Dated 11/1/2018 to
11/15/2018
YES Chair 05 MIN.
6. Stoplight Traffic Safety Camera
Ordinance
YES Todd Durham and
Ifeoma Canfield
05 MIN.
7. School Speed Zone YES Todd Durham and
Ifeoma Canfield
05 MIN.
8. Investment Report NO Joe Bartlemay & Lavina
Brennecke
05 MIN.
9. October Financial Report NO Aaron BeMiller 05 MIN.
10. Adjournment Chair 01 MIN.
Page 1 of 5
Pending Approval
Operations Committee
CC Ops Regular Meeting
Minutes
November 20, 2018
Date: November 20, 2018
Time: 4:00 PM
Place: Chambers East
Attending: Les Thomas, Committee Chair
Bill Boyce, Councilmember
Dennis Higgins, Councilmember
Toni Troutner, Councilmember
Agenda:
1. Call to Order 4:00 PM
2. Roll Call
Attendee Name Title Status Arrived
Les Thomas Committee Chair Excused
Bill Boyce Councilmember Present
Dennis Higgins Councilmember Present
Toni Troutner Councilmember Present
3. Changes to the Agenda
There were no changes to the agenda.
4. Approval of Minutes dated November 6, 2018
MOTION: Move to approve the Minutes dated November 6, 2018
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Toni Troutner, Councilmember
SECONDER: Dennis Higgins, Councilmember
AYES: Boyce, Higgins, Troutner
EXCUSED: Thomas
5. Approval of Check Summary
MOTION: Move to approve check summary report dated October 16,
2018 to October 31, 2018.
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Dennis Higgins, Councilmember
SECONDER: Toni Troutner, Councilmember
AYES: Boyce, Higgins, Troutner
EXCUSED: Thomas
6. Emergency Management Performance Grant
4
Packet Pg. 2
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
N
o
v
2
0
,
2
0
1
8
4
:
0
0
P
M
(
O
P
E
N
S
E
S
S
I
O
N
)
Operations Committee CC Ops Regular Meeting
Minutes
November 20, 2018
Kent, Washington
Page 2 of 5
Emergency Manager John Madson and Program Coordinator Kimberly
Behymer presented the annual Emergency Management Performance Grant
in the amount of $71,321 for approval. A couple of highlights included in the
work plan are the new emergency employee notification system to notify City
employees of emergency situations on campus. This will include the cost of
the software, training and roll-out of the system. Also included will be some
hardening devices for ShoWare to be installed primarily in the plaza area.
MOTION: Recommend council authorize the Mayor to accept and sign the
Emergency Management Performance Grant from the Washington Military
Department/Emergency Management Division and the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security, in the amount of $71,321, sign all necessary grant
documents and authorize expenditure of the funds in accordance with final
grant terms and conditions acceptable to the city attorney.
RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Toni Troutner, Councilmember
SECONDER: Dennis Higgins, Councilmember
AYES: Boyce, Higgins, Troutner
EXCUSED: Thomas
7. Legislative Agenda
Communications Manager Dana Neuts and Lobbyist Briahna Murray
presented the City of Kent's proposed legislative agenda and priorities for
2019. The process used to arrive at the legislative priorities identified
included Neuts and Murray meeting with department leadership to discuss
hot topics and hot issues and determine the priorities of each department.
These priorities were then presented to CAO Derek Matheson and Mayor
Dana Ralph and boiled down to the two documents included in the agenda
packet. Ms. Murray has been, and will continue working with legislators to
bring to their attention the positions that are most important to the City of
Kent.
MOTION: Move to recommend Council approve Kent’s 2019 State
Legislative Agenda.
RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Dennis Higgins, Councilmember
SECONDER: Toni Troutner, Councilmember
AYES: Boyce, Higgins, Troutner
EXCUSED: Thomas
8. Stoplight Traffic Safety Camera Ordinance
Chief Rafael Padilla, Commander Todd Durham and Assistant City Attorney
Ifeoma Canfield presented an ordinance to amend Kent City Code to
authorize use of automated traffic cameras to detect stoplight violations,
adopt standards and restrictions regarding use of automated traffic safety
4
Packet Pg. 3
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
N
o
v
2
0
,
2
0
1
8
4
:
0
0
P
M
(
O
P
E
N
S
E
S
S
I
O
N
)
Operations Committee CC Ops Regular Meeting
Minutes
November 20, 2018
Kent, Washington
Page 3 of 5
cameras and set monetary penalties for infractions detected by automatic
safety cameras. Chief Padilla informed the committee that each violation
recorded will be reviewed by an officer who will use processes consistent with
tickets that would be given out in person when deciding whether a ticket will
be issued. Council President Boyce asked what the implementation timeline
would be. Chief Padilla indicated it will be roughly 6 to 8 months. Once
cameras are in place there will be a communications campaign followed by a
"warning" period prior to tickets being issued.
MOTION: Recommend Council adopt an ordinance amending Chapter 9.36
of the Kent City Code by adding the new section 9.36.150 entitled, “Stoplight
traffic safety cameras.”
RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Toni Troutner, Councilmember
SECONDER: Dennis Higgins, Councilmember
AYES: Boyce, Higgins, Troutner
EXCUSED: Thomas
9. Stoplight Traffice Safety Camera Contract
Chief Rafael Padilla, Commander Todd Durham and Assistant City Attorney
Ifeoma Canfield presented the Stoplight Safety Camera contract for approval.
This contract modifies the existing contract with American Traffic Solutions,
the vendor currently being used for the school zone cameras, to include stop
light cameras at 11 approaches at six intersections identified following a
traffic study.
MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to enter into a contract or contract
amendment with American Traffic Solutions for stoplight traffic safety
cameras, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the city attorney
and police chief.
RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Dennis Higgins, Councilmember
SECONDER: Toni Troutner, Councilmember
AYES: Boyce, Higgins, Troutner
EXCUSED: Thomas
10. Highline Water District Franchise
Chief Administrative Officer Derek Matheson presented a draft franchise
agreement with Highline Water District. The agreement provides for a 6%
franchise fee in exchange for the city's commitment not to attempt to collect
our utility tax from the district and not to take over the district during the
term of the agreement. The term of the agreement is 15 years plus an
automatic extension for five years plus recurring automatic extensions of one
year each after that unless/until either party terminates the agreement. The
Highline Water District franchise also resolves a system of overlapping and
4
Packet Pg. 4
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
N
o
v
2
0
,
2
0
1
8
4
:
0
0
P
M
(
O
P
E
N
S
E
S
S
I
O
N
)
Operations Committee CC Ops Regular Meeting
Minutes
November 20, 2018
Kent, Washington
Page 4 of 5
confusing boundaries between the city and the district's respective water
service areas. These changes were made collaboratively and through a lens
of which entity can best serve a particular parcel.
MOTION: Recommend the City Council approve an ordinance
establishing a 15-year franchise agreement with Highline Water
District, and adjust the general fund budget accordingly.
RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Dennis Higgins, Councilmember
SECONDER: Toni Troutner, Councilmember
AYES: Boyce, Higgins, Troutner
EXCUSED: Thomas
11. Midway Sewer District Franchise
Chief Administrative Officer Derek Matheson presented a draft franchise
agreement with Midway Sewer District. The agreement provides for a 6%
franchise fee in exchange for the city's commitment not to attempt to collect
our utility tax from the district and not to take over the district during the
term of the agreement. The term of the agreement is 15 years plus an
automatic extension for five years plus recurring automatic extensions of one
year each after that unless/until either party terminates the agreement.
MOTION: Recommend the City Council approve an ordinance
establishing a 15-year franchise agreement with Midway Sewer
District, and adjust the general fund budget accordingly.
RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Toni Troutner, Councilmember
SECONDER: Dennis Higgins, Councilmember
AYES: Boyce, Higgins, Troutner
EXCUSED: Thomas
12. Consolidating Budget Adjustment Ordinance for Adjustments
between 7/1/18 and 11/14/18
Deputy Finance Director Barbara Lopez recommended adoption of a
consolidating budget adjustment ordinance for adjustments made between
July 1, 2018 and November 14, 2018, reflecting an overall budget increase of
$22,989,456. Adjustments totaling $11,440,194 have previously been
approved by Council. Adjustments totaling $11,549,262 have not been
previously approved by Council and include: transfer of general fund reserves
in excess of 18% to augment fund balances of several funds, transfer of
general fund reserves in excess of 18% to provide funding for projects,
targeted increases to ensure sufficient budget authority for several funds,
along with other projects and transfers. These expenditures are funded by
grants, existing fund balance, or other revenues. Ms. Lopez distributed copies
of the ordinance to be approved as it was not included in the agenda packet.
4
Packet Pg. 5
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
N
o
v
2
0
,
2
0
1
8
4
:
0
0
P
M
(
O
P
E
N
S
E
S
S
I
O
N
)
Operations Committee CC Ops Regular Meeting
Minutes
November 20, 2018
Kent, Washington
Page 5 of 5
MOTION: Recommend Council adopt a consolidating budget
adjustment ordinance for adjustments made between July 1, 2018
and November 14, 2018, reflecting an overall budget increase of
$22,989,456.
RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Dennis Higgins, Councilmember
SECONDER: Toni Troutner, Councilmember
AYES: Boyce, Higgins, Troutner
EXCUSED: Thomas
13. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 4:59.
Cathie Everett
Committee Secretary
4
Packet Pg. 6
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
N
o
v
2
0
,
2
0
1
8
4
:
0
0
P
M
(
O
P
E
N
S
E
S
S
I
O
N
)
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
Derek Matheson, Chief Administrative Officer
220 Fourth Ave S
Kent, WA 98032
256-856-5712
DATE: December 4, 2018
TO: Operations Committee
SUBJECT: Approval of Check Summary Report Dated 11/1/2018 to
11/15/2018
MOTION: Move to approve the check summary report dated 11/1/2018 to
11/15/2018.
SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL:
Sustainable Services
5
Packet Pg. 7
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
Derek Matheson, Chief Administrative Officer
220 Fourth Ave S
Kent, WA 98032
256-856-5712
DATE: December 4, 2018
TO: Operations Committee
SUBJECT: Stoplight Traffic Safety Camera Ordinance
MOTION: Recommend Council adopt an ordinance amending Chapter 9.36 of the
Kent City Code by adding the new section 9.36.150 entitled, “Stoplight traffic safety
cameras."
SUMMARY: The Police Department consistently receives calls about various traffic-
related safety issues including but not limited to speeding, near-misses in
crosswalks, and congestion. However, the Police Department Traffic Unit does not
have the staffing levels necessary to provide a constant presence in areas with a
high occurrence of traffic violations while also performing daily functions such as
responding to emergency calls, collisions, and violations viewed directly by officers.
RCW 46.63.170 authorizes local jurisdictions to use automated traffic safety
cameras to enforce traffic laws within its jurisdiction. Pursuant to RCW 46.63.170,
this ordinance establishes the City’s use of stoplight traffic safety cameras, and sets
forth the restrictions, public notice, and signage requirements, as well as the
processing and procedural requirements for use of the cameras. The ordinance also
establishes the fine for stoplight violations that are detected with cameras.
As required by RCW 46.63.170, the City’s Police Department and American Traffic
Solutions performed an analysis of the following locations:
104th Ave SE and SE 240th St: E/B and W/B approaches
104th Ave SE and SE 256th St: N/B and E/B approaches
84th Ave S and S 212th St: N/B and S/B approaches
Central Ave N and E James St: N/B and E/B approaches
Central Ave N and E Smith St: N/B and S/B approaches
S Kent Des Moines Rd and Pacific Hwy S: E/B approach
A summary of the analysis of these locations is attached to the ordinance as Exhibit
A. Staff is recommending that cameras be located at these locations.
At its November 20, 2018, meeting, the Operations Committee unanimously
recommended Council adopt the proposed ordinance. After the Committee
recommended adoption, the Police Department discovered a change that is needed
to section KCC 9.36.150(D) of the ordinance. This section of the ordinance
6
Packet Pg. 8
approved by the Committee on November 20, 2018, provides for a fine amount of
$124. The Department intended the fine for a violation of this new ordinance match
the base fine for similar infractions not captured by automated traffic safety
cameras, which is $136. Therefore, staff has returned the ordinance to Committee
for approval with the corrected fine amount. All of the other sections of the
ordinance remain the same.
Per the ordinance, all funds derived from the use of the cameras will be used to
cover the costs of administering the program. Excess funds will be used for criminal
justice-related purposes.
BUDGET IMPACT: General fund revenue.
SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL:
Innovative Government, Sustainable Services
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Stoplight Traffic Safety Cameras REVISED 113018 (PDF)
2. Exhibit A. Stop Light Camera Analysis - All Sites July 10 2018 (PDF)
3. 2018 Collision Locations (PDF)
6
Packet Pg. 9
1 KCC 9.36.150
Stoplight Traffic Safety Cameras Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, amending Chapter 9.36
of the Kent City Code, entitled "Traffic Code" by
adding a new section 9.36.150, entitled "Stoplight
traffic safety cameras," authorizing use of
automated traffic cameras to detect stoplight
violations; adopting the statutory standards and
restrictions regarding use of automated traffic
safety cameras; and setting the monetary penalty
for infractions detected by an automated traffic
safety camera.
RECITALS
A. Traffic accidents involving right-angle collisions at high rates
of speed are often the result of stoplight violations, and studies have
shown that these accidents involve more serious injury than other kinds of
accidents at signalized intersections.
B. The strategic placement of automated traffic safety cameras
at traffic control signal intersections has been shown to reduce the
frequency of violations, thereby reducing the risks to the public.
C. The City of Kent has numerous intersections that would
benefit from the placement of automated traffic safety cameras.
D. RCW 46.63.170 authorizes local jurisdictions to use
automated traffic safety cameras to enforce stoplight violations at
6.a
Packet Pg. 10
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
S
t
o
p
l
i
g
h
t
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
C
a
m
e
r
a
s
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
1
1
3
0
1
8
(
1
4
8
5
:
S
t
o
p
l
i
g
h
t
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
C
a
m
e
r
a
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
)
2 KCC 9.36.150
Stoplight Traffic Safety Cameras Ordinance
intersections of two arterials with traffic control signals that have yellow
change interval durations in accordance with RCW 47.36.022.
E. Consistent with the requirements of RCW 47.36.022, the
duration of the yellow change intervals at the City’s signalized intersections
are at least as long as the minimum yellow change interval identified in the
Department of Transportation’s manual on uniform traffic control devices
for streets and highways.
F. Pursuant to RCW 46.63.170, this ordinance establishes the
City’s use of automated traffic safety cameras at intersections where two
arterial roadways intersect, and sets forth the restrictions, public notice,
and signage requirements, as well as the processing and procedural
requirements for use of the automated traffic safety cameras.
G. As required by RCW 46.63.170, the Kent Police Department
and American Traffic Solutions performed an analysis of the following
intersections of two arterials: 104th Ave SE and SE 240th St – Eastbound
and Westbound approaches; 104th Ave SE and SE 256th St – Northbound
and Eastbound approaches; 84th Ave S and S 212th St – Northbound and
Southbound approaches; Central Ave N and E James St – Northbound and
Eastbound approaches; Central Ave N and E Smith St – Northbound and
Southbound approaches; and S Kent Des Moines Rd and Pacific Hwy S –
Eastbound approach. A summary of the analysis of these locations is
attached hereto as Exhibit A.
H. Funds derived from the use of automated traffic safety
cameras will be used to cover the costs of administering the program.
Funds in excess of those used to cover the costs of administering the
program will be utilized for enforcement and processing of traffic and
criminal laws in the city.
6.a
Packet Pg. 11
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
S
t
o
p
l
i
g
h
t
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
C
a
m
e
r
a
s
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
1
1
3
0
1
8
(
1
4
8
5
:
S
t
o
p
l
i
g
h
t
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
C
a
m
e
r
a
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
)
3 KCC 9.36.150
Stoplight Traffic Safety Cameras Ordinance
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT,
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE
SECTION 1. - Amendment. Chapter 9.36 of the Kent City Code,
entitled “Traffic Code,” is amended by adding a new section 9.36.150
entitled, “Stoplight traffic safety cameras,” as follows:
Sec. 9.36.150. Stoplight traffic safety cameras.
A. Authorized Use of Automated Traffic Safety Cameras. Pursuant to
the authority of RCW 46.63.170, the city is authorized to use automated
traffic safety cameras and related automated systems in order to detect,
record, and enforce and prosecute stoplight violations.
B. Limitation on Photos – Use of Photos.
1. Limitation on Photos. Automated traffic safety cameras may
only take pictures of the vehicle and vehicle license plate and only while an
infraction is occurring. The picture must not reveal the face of the driver or
of passengers in the vehicle.
2. Use of Photos. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, all
photographs, microphotographs, or electronic images prepared under this
section are for the exclusive use of law enforcement in the discharge of
duties under this section and are not open to the public and may not be
used in a court in a pending action or proceeding unless the action or
proceeding relates to a violation under this section. No photograph,
microphotograph, or electronic image may be used for any purpose other
than enforcement of violations under this section nor retained longer than
necessary to enforce this section.
C. Infraction Processing – Responsibilities - Presumption.
6.a
Packet Pg. 12
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
S
t
o
p
l
i
g
h
t
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
C
a
m
e
r
a
s
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
1
1
3
0
1
8
(
1
4
8
5
:
S
t
o
p
l
i
g
h
t
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
C
a
m
e
r
a
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
)
4 KCC 9.36.150
Stoplight Traffic Safety Cameras Ordinance
1. In General. Infractions detected through the use of
automated traffic safety cameras are not part of the registered owner's
driving record under RCW 46.52.101 and 46.52.120. Additionally,
infractions generated by the use of automated traffic safety cameras shall
be processed in the same manner as parking infractions, including for the
purposes of RCW 3.50.100, 35.20.220, 46.16A.120, and 46.20.270(3).
2. Notice of Infraction. A notice of infraction must be mailed to
the registered owner of the vehicle within fourteen days of the violation, or
to the renter of a vehicle within fourteen days of establishing the renter's
name and address under subsection C.4 of this section. The law
enforcement officer issuing the notice of infraction shall include with it a
certificate or facsimile thereof, based upon inspection of photographs,
microphotographs, or electronic images produced by an automated traffic
safety camera, stating the facts supporting the notice of infraction. This
certificate or facsimile is prima facie evidence of the facts contained in it
and is admissible in a proceeding charging a violation under this section.
Any citation or notice of infraction issued pursuant to this section may be
initiated by electronic signature of the issuing police officer. The
photographs, microphotographs, or electronic images evidencing the
violation must be available for inspection and admission into evidence in a
proceeding to adjudicate the liability for the infraction. A person receiving
a notice of infraction based on evidence detected by an automated traffic
safety camera may respond to the notice by mail.
3. Registered Owner Responsible – Rental Car Business. The
registered owner of a vehicle is responsible for an infraction issued
pursuant to this section unless the registered owner overcomes the
presumption in subsection C.5 of this section, or, in the case of a rental car
business, satisfies the conditions under subsection C.4 of this section. If
appropriate under the circumstances, a renter identified under subsection
C.4 of this section is responsible for an infraction.
6.a
Packet Pg. 13
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
S
t
o
p
l
i
g
h
t
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
C
a
m
e
r
a
s
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
1
1
3
0
1
8
(
1
4
8
5
:
S
t
o
p
l
i
g
h
t
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
C
a
m
e
r
a
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
)
5 KCC 9.36.150
Stoplight Traffic Safety Cameras Ordinance
4. Rental Cars. If the registered owner of the vehicle is a rental
car business, the law enforcement agency shall, before a notice of
infraction is issued under this section, provide a written notice to the rental
car business that a notice of infraction may be issued to the rental car
business if the rental car business does not, within eighteen days of
receiving the written notice, provide to the issuing agency by return mail:
a. A statement under oath stating the name and known
mailing address of the individual driving or renting the vehicle when the
infraction occurred; or
b. A statement under oath that the business is unable to
determine who was driving or renting the vehicle at the time the infraction
occurred because the vehicle was stolen at the time of the infraction. A
statement provided under this subsection must be accompanied by a copy
of a filed police report regarding the vehicle theft; or
c. In lieu of identifying the vehicle operator, the rental car
business may pay the applicable penalty.
Timely mailing of the statements described in subsections C.4.a and C.4.b
to the issuing law enforcement agency relieves a rental car business of any
liability under this section for the notice of infraction.
5. Presumption. Pursuant to RCW 46.63.075, in a traffic
infraction case involving an infraction detected through the use of an
automated traffic safety camera under this section, proof that the
particular vehicle described in the notice of traffic infraction was in
violation of a law enforced through the use of the automated traffic safety
camera, together with proof that the person named in the notice of traffic
infraction was at the time of the violation the registered owner of the
vehicle, constitutes in evidence a prima facie presumption that the
registered owner of the vehicle was the person in control of the vehicle at
6.a
Packet Pg. 14
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
S
t
o
p
l
i
g
h
t
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
C
a
m
e
r
a
s
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
1
1
3
0
1
8
(
1
4
8
5
:
S
t
o
p
l
i
g
h
t
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
C
a
m
e
r
a
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
)
6 KCC 9.36.150
Stoplight Traffic Safety Cameras Ordinance
the point where, and for the time during which, the violation occurred.
This presumption may be overcome only if the registered owner states,
under oath, in a written statement to the court or in testimony before the
court that the vehicle involved was, at the time, stolen or in the care,
custody, or control of some person other than the registered owner.
D. Infraction - Penalty. A driver facing a steady red traffic control signal
shall stop and shall remain stopped until an indication to proceed is shown.
It shall be an infraction to proceed through a stoplight at the intersections
of two arterials enforced through the use of an automated traffic safety
camera. The penalty for a stoplight infraction detected through the use of
an automated traffic safety camera shall be one hundred thirty-six dollars
($136). In addition to the fine provided herein, a violator may be assessed
any costs and assessments as required or permitted by state law or court
rule.
E. Signs – Payment to vendor – Alternative enforcement.
1. Stoplight locations must be signed. All locations where an
automated traffic safety camera is used must be clearly marked at least
thirty days prior to activation of the camera by placing signs in locations
that clearly indicate to a driver that he or she is entering a zone where
traffic laws are enforced by an automated traffic safety camera.
2. Payment made to vendor. The compensation paid by the city
to the manufacturer or vendor of the automated traffic safety camera
equipment must be based only upon the value of the equipment and
services provided or rendered in support of the system, and may not be
based upon a portion of the fine or civil penalty imposed or the revenue
generated by the equipment.
3. Alternative enforcement. Nothing in this section prohibits a
law enforcement officer from issuing a notice of traffic infraction to a
6.a
Packet Pg. 15
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
S
t
o
p
l
i
g
h
t
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
C
a
m
e
r
a
s
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
1
1
3
0
1
8
(
1
4
8
5
:
S
t
o
p
l
i
g
h
t
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
C
a
m
e
r
a
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
)
7 KCC 9.36.150
Stoplight Traffic Safety Cameras Ordinance
person in control of a vehicle at the time a violation occurs pursuant to
RCW 46.63.030(1)(a), (b), or (c).
F. Use of funds. Funds derived from the use of automated traffic
safety cameras shall be used to pay the costs of administering the
automated traffic safety camera program, including, but not limited to
personnel costs, vendor costs, and equipment costs. Funds in excess of
these costs may be used to fund personnel, programs, services and
equipment related to the enforcement and processing of traffic and
criminal laws within the city.
G. Definition. For the purposes of this section, "automated traffic safety
camera" means a device that uses a vehicle sensor installed to work in
conjunction with an intersection traffic control system, a railroad grade
crossing control system, or a speed measuring device, and a camera
synchronized to automatically record one or more sequenced photographs,
microphotographs, or electronic images of the rear of a motor vehicle at the
time the vehicle fails to stop when facing a steady red traffic control signal or
an activated railroad grade crossing control signal, or exceeds a speed limit in
a school speed zone as detected by a speed measuring device.
SECTION 2. – Severability. If any one or more section, subsection,
or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this
ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 3. – Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon
approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are
authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the
correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering; or
references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations.
6.a
Packet Pg. 16
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
S
t
o
p
l
i
g
h
t
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
C
a
m
e
r
a
s
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
1
1
3
0
1
8
(
1
4
8
5
:
S
t
o
p
l
i
g
h
t
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
C
a
m
e
r
a
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
)
8 KCC 9.36.150
Stoplight Traffic Safety Cameras Ordinance
SECTION 4. – Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and
be in force thirty days from and after its passage, as provided by law.
DANA RALPH, MAYOR Date Approved
ATTEST:
KIMBERLEY A. KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted
Date Published
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ARTHUR “PAT” FITZPATRICK, CITY ATTORNEY
6.a
Packet Pg. 17
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
S
t
o
p
l
i
g
h
t
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
C
a
m
e
r
a
s
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
1
1
3
0
1
8
(
1
4
8
5
:
S
t
o
p
l
i
g
h
t
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
C
a
m
e
r
a
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
)
Site Location System
Kent, WA
Direction Street Cross Street OptionsPredicted Violations
after Maturity
Internally
Approved
Conditions
Kent WA-2018-3-22; ;
* WA = States that Require Justification Reports (JRs) - state roads only
SR391 SP4; 1x;
SR391 SP4; 1x;
NB 104th Ave SE / SR 515 SE 240th St *
3.4
N/A1
-1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 -1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 4.5
-1
-1
0SLS
SR391 SP4; 1x;
SB 104th Ave SE / SR 515 SE 240th St *
4.4
N/A2
-1 -1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 -1 0SLS
SR391 SP4; 1x;
EB SE 240th St 104th Ave SE / SR 515 *
7.0
N/A3
-1 -1 -1 -1 0 0 0 0 -1 0SLS
SR391 SP4; 1x;
WB SE 240th St 104th Ave SE / SR 515 *
7.0
N/A4
-1 -1 -1 -1 0 0 0 0 -1 0SLS
Sunday, July 08, 2018 Page 1 of 6
The information provided in this report is an estimate and shall not be considered as binding. The actual numbers may be different.
Internally Approved: Yes = Site given internal approval by ATS; No = Site rejected by ATS; Green Arrow = Monitored Lane, Red Arrow = Not
Monitored Lane, Gray Arrow = TBD; Highlight = ATS Preferred Option
6.b
Packet Pg. 18
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
.
S
t
o
p
L
i
g
h
t
C
a
m
e
r
a
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
-
A
l
l
S
i
t
e
s
J
u
l
y
1
0
2
0
1
8
(
1
4
8
5
:
S
t
o
p
l
i
g
h
t
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
Site Location System
Kent, WA
Direction Street Cross Street OptionsPredicted Violations
after Maturity
Internally
Approved
Conditions
Kent WA-2018-3-22; ;
* WA = States that Require Justification Reports (JRs) - state roads only
SR391 SP4; 1x;
NB 104th Ave SE / SR 515 SE 256th St / SR 516 *
4.9
N/A5
-1 -1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 -1 0SLS
SB 104th Ave SE / SR 515 SE 256th St / SR 516 Not
Constructable
6
Not
Constructable
SR391 SP4; 1x;
EB SE 256th St / SR 516 104th Ave SE / SR 515 *
4.9
N/A7
-1 -1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 -1 0SLS
SR391 SP4; 11’ to 20’ mast
arm; 1x;
WB SE 256th St / SR 516 104th Ave SE / SR 515 *
4.0
N/A8
-1 -1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 -1 0SLS
Sunday, July 08, 2018 Page 2 of 6
The information provided in this report is an estimate and shall not be considered as binding. The actual numbers may be different.
Internally Approved: Yes = Site given internal approval by ATS; No = Site rejected by ATS; Green Arrow = Monitored Lane, Red Arrow = Not
Monitored Lane, Gray Arrow = TBD; Highlight = ATS Preferred Option
6.b
Packet Pg. 19
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
.
S
t
o
p
L
i
g
h
t
C
a
m
e
r
a
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
-
A
l
l
S
i
t
e
s
J
u
l
y
1
0
2
0
1
8
(
1
4
8
5
:
S
t
o
p
l
i
g
h
t
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
Site Location System
Kent, WA
Direction Street Cross Street OptionsPredicted Violations
after Maturity
Internally
Approved
Conditions
Kent WA-2018-3-22; ;
* WA = States that Require Justification Reports (JRs) - state roads only
SR391 SP4; 1x;
NB 84th Ave S S 212th St
5.4
N/A9
0 0 -1 -1 0 0 0 0 -1 0SLS
SR391 SP4; 1x;
SB 84th Ave S S 212th St
6.4
N/A10
-1 -1 -1 -1 0 0 0 0 -1 0SLS
SR391 SP4; 1x;
EB S 212th St 84th Ave S
5.2
N/A11
-1 -1 -1 -1 0 0 0 0 -1 0SLS
SR391 SP4; 1x;
WB S 212th St 84th Ave S
5.2
N/A12
0 -1 -1 -1 0 0 0 0 -1 0SLS
Sunday, July 08, 2018 Page 3 of 6
The information provided in this report is an estimate and shall not be considered as binding. The actual numbers may be different.
Internally Approved: Yes = Site given internal approval by ATS; No = Site rejected by ATS; Green Arrow = Monitored Lane, Red Arrow = Not
Monitored Lane, Gray Arrow = TBD; Highlight = ATS Preferred Option
6.b
Packet Pg. 20
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
.
S
t
o
p
L
i
g
h
t
C
a
m
e
r
a
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
-
A
l
l
S
i
t
e
s
J
u
l
y
1
0
2
0
1
8
(
1
4
8
5
:
S
t
o
p
l
i
g
h
t
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
Site Location System
Kent, WA
Direction Street Cross Street OptionsPredicted Violations
after Maturity
Internally
Approved
Conditions
Kent WA-2018-3-22; ;
* WA = States that Require Justification Reports (JRs) - state roads only
SR391 SP4; 1x;
SR391 SP4; 2x;
NB Central Ave N E James St
7.0
N/A13
0 -1 -1 -1 0 0 0 0
-1 -1 -1 -1 0 0 0 0 7.0
-1
-1
0SLS
SR391 SP4; 1x;
SR391 SP4; 11’ to 20’ mast
arm; 2x;
SB Central Ave N E James St
4.5
N/A14
0 0 -1 -1 0 0 0 0
-1 -1 -1 -1 0 0 0 0 4.9
-1
-1
0SLS
SR391 SP4; 1x;
SR391 SP4; 2x;
EB E James St Central Ave N
3.8
N/A15
-1 -1 -1 0 0 0 0 0
-1 -1 -1 -1 0 0 0 0 7.0
-1
-1
0SLS
WB E James St Central Ave N Not
Constructable
16
Not
Constructable
Sunday, July 08, 2018 Page 4 of 6
The information provided in this report is an estimate and shall not be considered as binding. The actual numbers may be different.
Internally Approved: Yes = Site given internal approval by ATS; No = Site rejected by ATS; Green Arrow = Monitored Lane, Red Arrow = Not
Monitored Lane, Gray Arrow = TBD; Highlight = ATS Preferred Option
6.b
Packet Pg. 21
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
.
S
t
o
p
L
i
g
h
t
C
a
m
e
r
a
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
-
A
l
l
S
i
t
e
s
J
u
l
y
1
0
2
0
1
8
(
1
4
8
5
:
S
t
o
p
l
i
g
h
t
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
Site Location System
Kent, WA
Direction Street Cross Street OptionsPredicted Violations
after Maturity
Internally
Approved
Conditions
Kent WA-2018-3-22; ;
* WA = States that Require Justification Reports (JRs) - state roads only
SR391 SP4; 1x;
NB Central Ave N E Smith St / SR 516 *
4.9
N/A17
-1 -1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 -1 0SLS
SR391 SP4; 1x;
SB Central Ave N E Smith St / SR 516 *
4.8
N/A18
-1 -1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 -1 0SLS
EB E Smith St / SR 516 Central Ave N *Not
Constructable
19
Not
Constructable
SR391 SP4; 1x;
WB E Smith St / SR 516 Central Ave N *
4.7
N/A20
0 -1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 -1 0SLS
SR391 SP4; 1x;
NB Kent Kangley Rd / SR 516 SE 256th St *
1.8
N/A21
-1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 0SLS
SR391 SP4; 1x;
WB SE 256th St Kent Kangley Rd / SR 516 *
Major tree
trim;
3.7
N/A22
-1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 0SLS
Sunday, July 08, 2018 Page 5 of 6
The information provided in this report is an estimate and shall not be considered as binding. The actual numbers may be different.
Internally Approved: Yes = Site given internal approval by ATS; No = Site rejected by ATS; Green Arrow = Monitored Lane, Red Arrow = Not
Monitored Lane, Gray Arrow = TBD; Highlight = ATS Preferred Option
6.b
Packet Pg. 22
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
.
S
t
o
p
L
i
g
h
t
C
a
m
e
r
a
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
-
A
l
l
S
i
t
e
s
J
u
l
y
1
0
2
0
1
8
(
1
4
8
5
:
S
t
o
p
l
i
g
h
t
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
Kent, WA
Direction Street Cross Street Overall Comments
* WA = States that Require Justification Reports (JRs) - state roads only
1 option 1: drop L3 and monitor L1-2 only w/ radar after driveawy, angle will cause us to
loose L3;
option 2: drop L1 and monitor L2-3 only w/ radar;
NB 104th Ave SE / SR 515 SE 240th St *
2 single pole rear radar in range on shoulder after driveway;SB 104th Ave SE / SR 515 SE 240th St *
3 single pole rear radar in range before driveway;EB SE 240th St 104th Ave SE / SR 515 *
4 single pole rear radar in range before driveway;WB SE 240th St 104th Ave SE / SR 515 *
5 single pole rear radar in range before driveway;NB 104th Ave SE / SR 515 SE 256th St / SR 516 *
6 not recommended due to large driveway on shoulder in pole area;SB 104th Ave SE / SR 515 SE 256th St / SR 516
7 single pole rear radar in range after driveway;EB SE 256th St / SR 516 104th Ave SE / SR 515 *
8 single pole rear radar in range on shoulder before driveway, mast arm required
shooting over L4;
WB SE 256th St / SR 516 104th Ave SE / SR 515 *
9 driveway limits rear pole placement, radar recommended on shoulder before driveway
for L3-4 only;
NB 84th Ave S S 212th St
10 single pole rear radar in range on shoulder for all lanes;SB 84th Ave S S 212th St
11 single pole rear radar in range on shoulder before driveway;EB S 212th St 84th Ave S
12 LT not recommended due to distance from rear pole to signal head, rear radar in
range on shoulder for L2-4;
WB S 212th St 84th Ave S
13 low hanging overhead wires;
limited rear pole offset due to fence up against sidewalk, pole required in sidewalk;
overlapping RT signal requires 2nd system;
option 1: drop L1 and monitor L2-4;
option 2: monitor all lanes w/ 2nd system required for the LT lane;
NB Central Ave N E James St
14 option 1: single pole rear radar in range between driveways for L3-4 only;
option 2: montor all lanes on shoulder before driveway w/ mast arm required and 2nd
system to get to LT lanes;
SB Central Ave N E James St
15 overlapping RT signal requires 2nd system;
option 1: drop L4 and monitor L1-3 on shoulder after driveway;
option 2: monitor all lanes w/ 2nd pole before driveway for RTs;
EB E James St Central Ave N
16 not recommended due to driveway on shoulder;WB E James St Central Ave N
17 single pole rear radar in range on shoulder after driveway;NB Central Ave N E Smith St / SR 516 *
18 single pole rear radar in range on shoulder after driveway;SB Central Ave N E Smith St / SR 516 *
19 not recommended due to driveways on shoulder;EB E Smith St / SR 516 Central Ave N *
20 single pole rear radar in range on shoulder before driveway for L2-3;WB E Smith St / SR 516 Central Ave N *
21 single pole rear radar in range on shoulder after RT connection;NB Kent Kangley Rd / SR 516 SE 256th St *
22 single pole rear radar in range on shoulder after driveway and before bust stop;WB SE 256th St Kent Kangley Rd / SR 516 *
Sunday, July 08, 2018 Page 6 of 6
The information provided in this report is an estimate and shall not be considered as binding. The actual numbers may be different.
Internally Approved: Yes = Site given internal approval by ATS; No = Site rejected by ATS; Green Arrow = Monitored Lane, Red Arrow = Not
Monitored Lane, Gray Arrow = TBD; Highlight = ATS Preferred Option
6.b
Packet Pg. 23
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
.
S
t
o
p
L
i
g
h
t
C
a
m
e
r
a
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
-
A
l
l
S
i
t
e
s
J
u
l
y
1
0
2
0
1
8
(
1
4
8
5
:
S
t
o
p
l
i
g
h
t
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
2018 Collisions: Busiest Intersections
Each dot on the map represents one or more collisions at a location. Therefore, using the Density feature, you can
visually see how many collisions occurred in a specific area. The darker the density “blob”, the more collisions in close
proximity to each other in a specific area. The yellow on the density map shows the highest concentrated area, again
based upon the number of collisions in proximity to each other. The yellow area, centered upon Kent Station,
encompassing the area from 4th to Central, James to Smith, has had a total of 94 collions.
So far in 2018, the city has had a total of 2,084 Collisions. The Top 7 intersections for collisions have been:
I gave three different counts above: the actual intersection, within a block of the intersection, and within the density
“blob”, which is about an 8 block (½ mile) radius around the intersection.
With 39 collisions, the most so far in 2008, 108th/208th accounted for only 1.8% of all collisions in the city. But if you take
the ½ mile radius around the 104/240 intersection, that area, with 104 collisions, accounted for 5% of all collisions city-
wide.
Intersection Count Count within 1 block Density blob
108/208 39 44 74
104/240 27 46 104
James/Cental 20 23 70
Smith/Central 20 22 87
104/256 18 33 85
84/212 15 27 57
Meeker/Washington 13 24 57
Density Map Collision locations overlaid
on top of Density Map
6.c
Packet Pg. 24
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
1
8
C
o
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
1
4
8
5
:
S
t
o
p
l
i
g
h
t
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
C
a
m
e
r
a
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
)
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
Derek Matheson, Chief Administrative Officer
220 Fourth Ave S
Kent, WA 98032
256-856-5712
DATE: December 4, 2018
TO: Operations Committee
SUBJECT: School Speed Zone
MOTION: Recommend Council adopt the proposed ordinance which amends Kent
City Code section 9.36.140 to increase the base fine for an infraction committed in
a school speed zone from $124 to $136.
SUMMARY: School speed zones are located in areas occupied by a high number of
pedestrians, especially before, during and after school, where driver inattention and
speeding can have devastating consequences. The strategic placement of
automated traffic safety cameras at school zones has been shown to reduce vehicle
speeds, thereby reducing the risks to pedestrians.
RCW 46.63.170 authorizes local jurisdictions to use cameras to enforce speed limits
in school speed zones. Pursuant to RCW 46.63.170, on May 21, 2013, Ordinance
No. 4080 was adopted by the Council setting forth the restrictions, public notice,
and signage requirements, as well as the processing and procedural requirements
for use of the cameras. The ordinance also established the fines for violations of
school speed zones that are detected with cameras.
Since enacting Ordinance No. 4080, and in accordance with RCW 46.63.170,
Camera systems were installed at the school speed zones for Sunrise Elementary,
Neeley O’Brien Elementary, Meridian Elementary and Millennium Elementary.
These cameras have proven successful at reducing the speeds of vehicles in these
school zones, thus creating a safer environment for pedestrians. More recently,
Meadow Ridge Elementary and Springbrook Elementary were added to the school
speed zone traffic safety camera program, with an expected roll-out in January,
2019.
Currently, an infraction committed in a school speed zone that is detected through
the use of an automated traffic safety camera is subject to a $124 penalty. The
Police Department recommends increasing the monetary penalty assessed to $136.
The penalty established by the ordinance has not been adjusted since 2013. The
proposed amount of $136 is consistent with the amount currently imposed for
many other similar traffic infractions in Kent.
BUDGET IMPACT: General fund revenue.
7
Packet Pg. 25
SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL:
Innovative Government, Sustainable Services
ATTACHMENTS:
1. School Zone Traffic Safety Camera Ordinance.Amendment-120418-REVISED
(PDF)
7
Packet Pg. 26
1 Amend KCC 9.36.140
School Speed Zone
Traffic Safety Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, amending Section
9.36.140 of the Kent City Code, entitled “School
Speed Zone Traffic Safety Cameras,” to increase
the monetary penalty for an infraction committed
in a school speed zone detected by an automated
traffic safety camera.
RECITALS
A. School speed zones are located in areas occupied by a high
number of pedestrians, especially before, during and after school, and
driver inattention and speeding can have devastating consequences.
B. On May 21, 2013, pursuant to RCW 46.63.170, the Kent City
Council adopted Ordinance No. 4080, which set forth the restrictions,
public notice, and signage requirements, as well as the processing and
procedural requirements for use of school speed zone cameras. The
ordinance also established the monetary penalty for an infraction
committed in a school speed zone that is detected through the use of an
automated traffic safety camera.
C. Currently, an infraction committed in a school speed zone that
is detected through the use of an automated traffic safety camera is
subject to a $124 penalty.
7.a
Packet Pg. 27
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
S
c
h
o
o
l
Z
o
n
e
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
C
a
m
e
r
a
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
.
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
-
1
2
0
4
1
8
-
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
(
1
4
8
6
:
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
p
e
e
d
Z
o
n
e
)
2 Amend KCC 9.36.140
School Speed Zone
Traffic Safety Ordinance
D. The monetary penalty established by the ordinance has not
been increase since 2013.
E. This ordinance amends Section 9.36.140 of the Kent City
Code, increasing the infraction penalty from $124 to $136.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT,
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE
SECTION 1. - Amendment. Section 9.36.140 of the Kent City
Code, entitled “School Speed Zone Traffic Safety Cameras,” is hereby
amended as follows:
Sec. 9.36.140 School speed zone traffic safety cameras.
A. Authorized use of automated traffic safety cameras. Pursuant to the
authority of RCW 46.63.170, the city is authorized to use automated traffic
safety cameras and related automated systems in order to detect, record,
and enforce and prosecute school speed zone violations.
B. Limitation on photos – Use of photos.
1. Limitation on photos. Automated traffic safety cameras may
only take pictures of the vehicle and vehicle license plate and only while an
infraction is occurring. The picture must not reveal the face of the driver or
of passengers in the vehicle.
2. Use of photos. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, all
photographs, microphotographs, or electronic images prepared under this
section are for the exclusive use of law enforcement in the discharge of
duties under this section and are not open to the public and may not be
7.a
Packet Pg. 28
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
S
c
h
o
o
l
Z
o
n
e
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
C
a
m
e
r
a
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
.
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
-
1
2
0
4
1
8
-
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
(
1
4
8
6
:
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
p
e
e
d
Z
o
n
e
)
3 Amend KCC 9.36.140
School Speed Zone
Traffic Safety Ordinance
used in a court in a pending action or proceeding unless the action or
proceeding relates to a violation under this section. No photograph,
microphotograph, or electronic image may be used for any purpose other
than enforcement of violations under this section nor retained longer than
necessary to enforce this section.
C. Infraction processing – Responsibilities – Presumption.
1. In general. Infractions detected through the use of automated
traffic safety cameras are not part of the registered owner’s driving record
under RCW 46.52.101 and 46.52.120. Additionally, infractions generated
by the use of automated traffic safety cameras shall be processed in the
same manner as parking infractions, including for the purposes of RCW
3.50.100, 35.20.220, 46.16A.120, and 46.20.270(3).
2. Notice of infraction. A notice of infraction must be mailed to
the registered owner of the vehicle within fourteen (14) days of the
violation, or to the renter of a vehicle within fourteen (14) days of
establishing the renter’s name and address under subsection (C)(4) of this
section. The law enforcement officer issuing the notice of infraction shall
include with it a certificate or facsimile thereof, based upon inspection of
photographs, microphotographs, or electronic images produced by an
automated traffic safety camera, stating the facts supporting the notice of
infraction. This certificate or facsimile is prima facie evidence of the facts
contained in it and is admissible in a proceeding charging a violation under
this section. Any citation or notice of infraction issued pursuant to this
section may be initiated by electronic signature of the issuing police officer.
The photographs, microphotographs, or electronic images evidencing the
violation must be available for inspection and admission into evidence in a
proceeding to adjudicate the liability for the infraction. A person receiving
a notice of infraction based on evidence detected by an automated traffic
safety camera may respond to the notice by mail.
7.a
Packet Pg. 29
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
S
c
h
o
o
l
Z
o
n
e
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
C
a
m
e
r
a
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
.
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
-
1
2
0
4
1
8
-
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
(
1
4
8
6
:
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
p
e
e
d
Z
o
n
e
)
4 Amend KCC 9.36.140
School Speed Zone
Traffic Safety Ordinance
3. Registered owner responsible – Rental car business. The
registered owner of a vehicle is responsible for an infraction issued
pursuant to this section unless the registered owner overcomes the
presumption in subsection (C)(5) of this section, or, in the case of a rental
car business, satisfies the conditions under subsection (C)(4) of this
section. If appropriate under the circumstances, a renter identified under
subsection (C)(4) of this section is responsible for an infraction.
4. Rental cars. If the registered owner of the vehicle is a rental
car business, the law enforcement agency shall, before a notice of
infraction is issued under this section, provide a written notice to the rental
car business that a notice of infraction may be issued to the rental car
business if the rental car business does not, within eighteen (18) days of
receiving the written notice, provide to the issuing agency by return mail:
a. A statement under oath stating the name and known
mailing address of the individual driving or renting the vehicle when the
infraction occurred; or
b. A statement under oath that the business is unable to
determine who was driving or renting the vehicle at the time the infraction
occurred because the vehicle was stolen at the time of the infraction. A
statement provided under this subsection must be accompanied by a copy
of a filed police report regarding the vehicle theft; or
c. In lieu of identifying the vehicle operator, the rental car
business may pay the applicable penalty.
Timely mailing of the statements described in subsections (C)(4)(a) and
(b) of this section to the issuing law enforcement agency relieves a rental
car business of any liability under this section for the notice of infraction.
7.a
Packet Pg. 30
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
S
c
h
o
o
l
Z
o
n
e
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
C
a
m
e
r
a
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
.
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
-
1
2
0
4
1
8
-
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
(
1
4
8
6
:
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
p
e
e
d
Z
o
n
e
)
5 Amend KCC 9.36.140
School Speed Zone
Traffic Safety Ordinance
5. Presumption. Pursuant to RCW 46.63.075, in a traffic
infraction case involving an infraction detected through the use of an
automated traffic safety camera under this section, proof that the
particular vehicle described in the notice of traffic infraction was in
violation of a law enforced through the use of the automated traffic safety
camera, together with proof that the person named in the notice of traffic
infraction was at the time of the violation the registered owner of the
vehicle, constitutes in evidence a prima facie presumption that the
registered owner of the vehicle was the person in control of the vehicle at
the point where, and for the time during which, the violation occurred. This
presumption may be overcome only if the registered owner states, under
oath, in a written statement to the court or in testimony before the court
that the vehicle involved was, at the time, stolen or in the care, custody,
or control of some person other than the registered owner.
D. Infraction – Penalty. It shall be an infraction to exceed the posted
speed limit in a school speed zone enforced through the use of an
automated traffic safety camera. The penalty for an infraction committed
in a school speed zone which is detected through the use of an automated
traffic safety camera shall be one hundred twenty-fourthirty-six dollars
($124136); provided, the penalty shall be two hundred forty-eight dollars
($248) for a violation in which the vehicle was operated at a speed of
thirty (30) miles per hour or more. In addition to the fines provided herein,
a violator may be assessed any costs and assessments as required or
permitted by state law or court rule.
E. Signs – Payment to vendor – Alternative enforcement.
1. School zones must be signed. All locations where an
automated traffic safety camera is used must be clearly marked at least
thirty (30) days prior to activation of the camera by placing signs in
7.a
Packet Pg. 31
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
S
c
h
o
o
l
Z
o
n
e
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
C
a
m
e
r
a
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
.
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
-
1
2
0
4
1
8
-
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
(
1
4
8
6
:
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
p
e
e
d
Z
o
n
e
)
6 Amend KCC 9.36.140
School Speed Zone
Traffic Safety Ordinance
locations that clearly indicate to a driver that he or she is entering a zone
where traffic laws are enforced by an automated traffic safety camera.
2. Payment made to vendor. The compensation paid by the city
to the manufacturer or vendor of the automated traffic safety camera
equipment must be based only upon the value of the equipment and
services provided or rendered in support of the system, and may not be
based upon a portion of the fine or civil penalty imposed or the revenue
generated by the equipment.
3. Alternative enforcement. Nothing in this section prohibits a
law enforcement officer from issuing a notice of traffic infraction to a
person in control of a vehicle at the time a violation occurs pursuant to
RCW 46.63.030(1)(a), (b), or (c).
F. Use of funds. Funds derived from the use of automated traffic safety
cameras shall be used to pay the costs of administering the automated
traffic safety camera program, including but not limited to personnel costs,
vendor costs, and equipment costs. Funds in excess of these costs may be
used to fund personnel, programs, services, and equipment related to the
enforcement and processing of traffic and criminal laws within the city.
G. Definition. For the purposes of this section, automated traffic safety
camera means a device that uses a vehicle sensor installed to work in
conjunction with an intersection traffic control system, a railroad grade
crossing control system, or a speed measuring device, and a camera
synchronized to automatically record one or more sequenced photographs,
microphotographs, or electronic images of the rear of a motor vehicle at
the time the vehicle fails to stop when facing a steady red traffic control
signal or an activated railroad grade crossing control signal, or exceeds a
speed limit in a school speed zone as detected by a speed measuring
device.
7.a
Packet Pg. 32
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
S
c
h
o
o
l
Z
o
n
e
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
C
a
m
e
r
a
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
.
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
-
1
2
0
4
1
8
-
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
(
1
4
8
6
:
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
p
e
e
d
Z
o
n
e
)
7 Amend KCC 9.36.140
School Speed Zone
Traffic Safety Ordinance
SECTION 2. – Severability. If any one or more section, subsection,
or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this
ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 3. – Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon
approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are
authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the
correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering;
or references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or
regulations.
SECTION 4. – Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and
be in force thirty days from and after its passage, as provided by law.
DANA RALPH, MAYOR Date Approved
ATTEST:
KIMBERLEY A. KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted
Date Published
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ARTHUR “PAT” FITZPATRICK, CITY ATTORNEY
7.a
Packet Pg. 33
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
S
c
h
o
o
l
Z
o
n
e
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
C
a
m
e
r
a
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
.
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
-
1
2
0
4
1
8
-
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
(
1
4
8
6
:
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
p
e
e
d
Z
o
n
e
)
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
Derek Matheson, Chief Administrative Officer
220 Fourth Ave S
Kent, WA 98032
256-856-5712
DATE: December 4, 2018
TO: Operations Committee
SUBJECT: Investment Report
SUMMARY: Per City policy, once a quarter the finance director shall submit a
report to the Operations Committee that summarizes the City’s investment
portfolio.
SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL:
Sustainable Services
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Q3 2018 Investment Reports (PDF)
8
Packet Pg. 34
CITY OF KENT
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
September 30, 2018
Market ValuePurchase Investment
II Cash - US Bank
WA State LGIP
2.OOOo/o
2.0620/o
Overnight
Overnight
19,005,341
60,TOL,7LL
Portfolio
1
60,101,711
t17
Kent Portfolio
r Cash
r WA StAtE LGIP
r U.S. Treasuries
r Supra National Bonds
r Municipal Bonds
r Gov't. Agencies
¡ Corporate Notes
r Commercial Paper
- Bank Notes
PFM initiated 19 investment trades in the 3rd quarter of 2018.
The PFM managed portfolio held 100 investments at O9/3O/2OIB.
In August 2018 the City added an additional $40 million to the PFM managed portfolio.
The treasury yield curve is steeper in the 0-3 year and has flattened in the longer term.
The City is currently carrying a more than adequate balance in cash and the LGIP.
Portfolio allocations at09/30/2018 were in compliance with the City's investment policy.
Q3-2018 investment interest revenue: $896,626.85.
YTD -2018 investment interest revenue: 92,L67,O24.04.
8.a
Packet Pg. 35
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
Q
3
2
0
1
8
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
(
1
4
8
0
:
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
)
CITY OF KENT
CASH AND INVESTMENTS BY TYPE
QUARTER ENDING BALANCES
2017 Q3-Q4 AND 2018 Ql-Q3
250,000,000
200,000,000
150,000,000
100,000,000
50,000,000
---aþ,- Totatc&t
+LGIP
.'...,"@ cash
Other ¡nvestments
.........---?
-----------a""
ù----------'
3rd Quarter 2017 4th Quarter 2017 1st Quarter 2018 2nd Quarter 2018 3rd Quarter 2018
8.a
Packet Pg. 36
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
Q
3
2
0
1
8
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
(
1
4
8
0
:
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
)
CASH AND INVESTMENTS
MONTH ENDING BALANCES
2016t2017t2018
250,000,000
200,000,000
150,000,000
---a--- æ16
100,000,000
50,000,000
\
"'o_-a--'---a"'
-
4
---+--
-#
---t--'
-T
-o-
'--a---
¿JÉ
,---(>----'j'-
-<r
--+'-'
4
---a--'
ts
o-
a--'
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
8.a
Packet Pg. 37
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
Q
3
2
0
1
8
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
(
1
4
8
0
:
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
)
Quarterly Interest Earnings
Q3, 2OL7 - Qq' 2O1g
800,000
737,979
700,000
633,600
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
93,LLL
100,000
Q320L7 Q420L7 Ql2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018
r General Fund r Other Funds
I l)ðrb4ö
r2L,O73
78.225
II
485,650
93,643
8.a
Packet Pg. 38
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
Q
3
2
0
1
8
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
(
1
4
8
0
:
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
)
Total Cash and Investments By Fund
September 3O, 2018
1 000
I 100
1200
1 300
1400
1 500
1 600
1 800
1 900
1950
2200
2500
3100
3200
3300
3400
3500
41 00
4400
4700
4800
5100
5200
5400
5600
5900
6200
6400
6500
6600
6700
6800
7100
General Fund
Street Fund
PS Retiree Healthcare Fund
Lodging Tax Fund
Youth/Teen Fund
Capital Resources Fund
Criminal Justice Fund
Housing & Comm Dev Fund
Other Operating Projects Fund
Kent Events Center Operating Fund
Non-Voted Debt Service Fund
Spec Assess Debt Service Fund
Street Capital Projects Fund
Parks Capital Projects Fund
Other Capital Projects Fund
Technology Capital Projects Fund
Facilities Capital Projects Fund
Water Fund
Drainage Fund
Solid Waste Fund
Golf Fund
Fleet Service Fund
Central Services Fund
Facilities Management Fund
Insurance Fund
Deferred Compensation Fund
Firefighters Pension Fund
Deferred Comp Fund
Payroll Clearing Fund
Subsystem Clearing Fund
Utility Clearing Fund
Agency Clearing Fund
Special Events Center-PFD
Total:
24,905,514
6,613,066
1 ,873,913
372,978
747,215
25,413,156
7,439,794
(379,086)
662,392
1 ,916,963
986,220
1,145,601
7,562,692
4,648,151
965,038
6,192,674
18,944
36,990,900
37,355,600
520,144
4,235,274
5,953,455
4,031,658
4,593,916
7,999,226
66,330
2,222,574
(75)
80,819
(5,272)
687,605
1,390,606
587 794
197 1
8.a
Packet Pg. 39
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
Q
3
2
0
1
8
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
(
1
4
8
0
:
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
)
pfm
CITY OF KENT. 4882OOOO
Description
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
Supra-National Agency Bond / Note
Municipal Bond / Note
Federal Agency Bond / Note
Corporate Note
Commercial Paper
Bank Note
Managed Account Sub-Total
Accrued Interest
Total Portfolio
Unsettled Trades
Portfolio Summaly and Statistics
ParValue MarketValue Percent
69,610,000.00
5,285,000.00
455,000.00
20,264,000.00
22,915,000.00
1,500,000.00
79.640/o
67,421,229.95
5,189,690.43
453,489.40
L9,728,995.89
22,639,I28.81
1,489,102.50
75.260/o
57.43
4.42
0.39
16.80
19.28
1.27
0.4r
US TSY Bond /
57.43o/o
Yield to Maturity at Cost
Yield to Maturity at Market
Duration to Worst
Weighted Average Days to Maturity
For the Month Ending September 30, 2018
Note
0.4Lo/o
Paper
L.27o/o
Note
!9.28o/o
Fed Agy Bond /
Note
16.80o/o
Bond / Note
O.39o/o
Supra-National
Bond / Note
4.42o/o
2.45o/o
2.90o/o
2.42
924
08
120,524,000.00 LL7,4O3.957.06 10O.OOo/o
551.608.73
120,524,000.00 1L7,955,565'79
o.oo 0.00
27.94o/"
27.O2o/o
I
8.760/o
7-38o/o
0.00o/o
0-6Months 6-12Months 1-2Years 2-3Years 3-4Years 4-5Years Over5Years
Account Summary Sector Allocation
Maturity Distribution Characteristics
PFM Asset Management LLC Account 48820000 Page 2
8.a
Packet Pg. 40
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
Q
3
2
0
1
8
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
(
1
4
8
0
:
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
)
@
Short'Term Yield lncreases Outpace Longer-Term yields
U.S. Treasury Yield Gurve
3.5o/o
3.0o/o
2.5o/o
2.0o/o
1.5o/o
e
6
+
óet6eo'6ot6OtÓea"ô'ècê'
^6-
-c9"
!t
o
1.0o/o
0.5%
0.0o/o
-$spfsmber
28,2018
ooôc6December30,2017
December 29, 2016
3
M
5
Y
4
Y
3
Y
2
Y
1
Y
Maturity
10
Y
Source: Bioomberg, as of 9/28/2018.
0.45o/o
0.610/o
0.82%
1.21o/o
1.47o/o
1.95o/o
2.48o/o
1.38o/o
1.53o/o
1.73o/o
1.88o/o
1.97o/o
2.21o/o
2.41o/o
2.20o/o
2.360/"
2.56%
2.82o/o
2.88o/o
2.95Yo
3.06%
3 month
6 month
I year
2year
3 year
5 year
l0 year
Current
9t28t18
Year-End
12t31nA17
Year-End
12t31t16
Tenor
@ PFM 31
8.a
Packet Pg. 41
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
Q
3
2
0
1
8
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
(
1
4
8
0
:
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
)
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
Derek Matheson, Chief Administrative Officer
220 Fourth Ave S
Kent, WA 98032
256-856-5712
DATE: December 4, 2018
TO: Operations Committee
SUBJECT: October Financial Report
SUMMARY: The Finance Director will report out the October 2018 financial report.
SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL:
Sustainable Services
ATTACHMENTS:
1. October Monthly Report (PDF)
9
Packet Pg. 42
2018
Adj Budget
2018
YTD
2018
Est Actual
Variance
Favorable
(Unfavorable)
%Variance
Favorable
(Unfavorable)
Revenues 103,130,990 92,610,831 108,980,890 5,849,900 5.7%
Expenditures 109,470,667 84,694,308 108,902,299 568,368 0.5%
Net Revenues Less Expenditures (6,339,677) 7,916,523 78,591 6,418,268
Beginning Fund Balance 21,595,175 21,595,175
Ending Fund Balance 15,255,498 21,673,766
Ending Fund Balance Detail:
General Fund Reserves 14,665,328 20,282,816
13.4%18.6%
Restricted for Annexation 590,170 1,390,950
Revenue Overview
Expenditures Overview
Required Ending Fund Balance Calculation
Estimated Expenditures for 2018 (from above)108,902,299
18.0%
18% GF Ending Fund Balance 19,602,414
Through October, all departments are remaining fairly close to budget with an overall budget variance of $568
thousand or 0.5%.
October 2018 Monthly Financial Report
City of Kent, Washington
General Fund Overview
Summary
Analysis through October shows an overall positive budget variance of $6.4 million.
The budgeted use of fund balance is offset by the positive budget variance of $6.4 million, creating a net surplus of
$0.1m.
General Fund Reserves are estimated to end the year at $20.3 million, or 18.6% of estimated 2018 expenditures.
Revenues are estimated to end the year approximately $5.8 million (5.7%) higher than budgeted.
6.93
2.06 0.83 0.64
4.13
7.65
9.46 11.91
18.92
20.65 20.28
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Est. 2018
General Fund Ending Fund Balance 10-year History (excluding Annexation)$ in
millions
Page 1 of 14
9.a
Packet Pg. 43
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
M
o
n
t
h
l
y
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
1
4
8
1
:
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
)
Revenue Categories 2018
Adj Budget
2018
YTD
2018
Est Actual
Variance
Favorable
(Unfavorable)
%Variance
Favorable
(Unfavorable)
Taxes:
Property 29,532,710 28,332,144 29,546,710 14,000 0.0%
Sales & Use 21,100,310 19,586,670 23,188,200 2,087,890 9.9%
Utility 19,150,880 16,252,499 19,122,890 (27,990) -0.1%
Business & Occupation 8,890,480 6,146,879 9,235,880 345,400 3.9%
Other 879,260 719,074 1,030,470 151,210 17.2%
Licenses and Permits 5,695,870 6,446,445 7,561,640 1,865,770 32.8%
Intergovernmental Revenue 7,946,370 6,180,466 7,771,780 (174,590) -2.2%
Charges for Services 5,844,610 5,747,278 6,834,280 989,670 16.9%
Fines and Forfeitures 1,565,970 998,838 1,201,830 (364,140) -23.3%
Miscellaneous Revenue 1,574,530 2,200,538 2,537,210 962,680 61.1%
Transfers In 950,000 - 950,000 -
Total Revenues 103,130,990 92,610,831 108,980,890 5,849,900 5.7%
Miscellaneous Revenue: $943k increase due to interest income ($293k), rents & royaties ($210k), and
miscellaneous revenue ($403k - due mostly to PD reimbursements).
October 2018 Monthly Financial Report
City of Kent, Washington
General Fund Overview - Revenues
Variance analysis for revenues is provided for particular line items or those in which the estimated actual amount
differs from the budgeted amount by at least 10% or minimum of $500,000.
Variance Notes
Fines & Forfeitures: $364k under budget due to under performance of Court Holdings ($285k) & Civil Penalties
($355k), offset by increases in Criminal Penalties ($162k) and B&O Penalties ($153k)
Licenses and Permits: $1.9m increase due to $1.2m of bldg/struc permits, $320k in higher street/curb permits,
$187k in fire permits, & $202k in business licenses & franchise fees.
Other Taxs: $151k increase due to higher than anticipated admission taxes ($59k) & gambling taxes ($92k)
Sales & Use Tax: $2.1m increase due to higher than anticipated sales tax revenues in May-Oct.
Charges & Services: $990k increase over budget due to higher planning development service charges of $1.3m
than budgeted, offset by decreases in public safety charges of ($167k), Culture & Rec ($47k), & Gen Govt ($47k).
2018 Estimated
General Fund
Revenues
Property Taxes
27%
Sales Taxes
21%
Utility Taxes
18%
B&O Taxes
9%
Other Taxes
1%Licenses and
Permits
7%
Intergovernmental
7%
Charges for
Services
6%
Fines and Forfeits
Misc & Transfers In
3%
Other
17%
Page 2 of 14
9.a
Packet Pg. 44
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
M
o
n
t
h
l
y
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
1
4
8
1
:
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
)
Prior Year
Revenues
Budgeted
Revenues
Actual
Revenues
January 5,578 6,021 5,721
February 5,024 5,516 5,542
March 7,586 8,148 7,432
April 17,008 16,729 18,343
May 6,492 7,431 8,891
June 6,175 6,633 6,778
July 7,351 6,916 8,084
August 5,581 5,633 5,496
September 6,738 7,301 6,935
October 15,494 16,964 19,388
November 6,875 6,659 0
December 11,017 9,180 0
Total 100,919 103,131 92,611
Prior Year
Revenues
Budgeted
Revenues
Actual
Revenues
January 0 11 0
February 197 224 213
March 711 966 736
April 9,768 11,775 12,768
May 1,324 2,345 1,860
June 109 160 121
July 26 56 269
August 85 107 104
September 561 665 327
October 8,610 11,300 11,934
November 1,361 1,668 0
December 249 256 0
Total 23,000 29,533 28,332
Prior Year
Revenues
Budgeted
Revenues
Actual
Revenues
January 1,686 1,610 1,761
February 1,986 2,056 2,045
March 1,550 1,560 1,810
April 1,547 1,553 1,604
May 1,836 1,781 2,074
June 1,587 1,456 2,019
July 1,739 1,724 2,000
August 1,964 1,918 2,152
September 1,693 1,771 2,066
October 1,783 1,765 2,056
November 1,841 1,916 0
December 1,898 1,992 0
Total 21,109 21,100 19,587
October 2018 Monthly Financial Report
City of Kent, Washington
General Fund Revenues ($ in Thousands)
All Revenues Sources
Property Tax
Sales Tax
$0
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
$120,000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
18 Bud 17 Act 18 Act
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
18 Bud 17 Act 18 Act
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
18 Bud 17 Act 18 Act
Page 3 of 14
9.a
Packet Pg. 45
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
M
o
n
t
h
l
y
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
1
4
8
1
:
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
)
October 2018 Monthly Financial Report
City of Kent, Washington
General Fund Revenues ($ in Thousands)
Prior Year
Revenues
Budgeted
Revenues
Actual
Revenues
January 1,842 2,052 1,860
February 1,829 1,675 1,771
March 1,739 1,606 1,719
April 1,873 1,817 1,737
May 1,566 1,486 1,602
June 1,505 1,363 1,447
July 1,631 1,707 1,647
August 1,479 1,434 1,482
September 1,574 1,674 1,560
October 1,536 1,498 1,427
November 1,535 1,443 0
December 1,540 1,396 0
Total 19,648 19,151 16,252
Prior Year
Revenues
Budgeted
Revenues
Actual
Revenues
January 1 6 1
February 4 24 3
March 494 265 33
April 1,945 1,888 322
May 232 338 1,688
June 153 123 223
July 1,984 1,753 2,011
August 185 364 340
September 8 92 145
October 1,950 1,965 2,100
November 578 358 0
December 2,509 2,595 0
Total 10,042 9,770 6,866
Prior Year
Revenues
Budgeted
Revenues
Actual
Revenues
January 2,049 1,697 2,099
February 1,008 948 1,510
March 3,092 2,765 3,135
April 1,876 1,597 1,912
May 1,534 1,519 1,667
June 2,820 2,980 2,968
July 1,969 1,610 2,157
August 1,868 1,467 1,419
September 2,902 2,758 2,836
October 1,615 1,931 1,870
November 1,561 1,195 0
December 4,821 3,110 0
Total 27,119 23,577 21,574
Utility Tax
Other Taxes
Other Revenues
(Intergovernmental, Licenses & Permits, Charges for Service, Fines & Forfeits, and Misc Revenues)
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
18 Bud 17 Act 18 Act
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
18 Bud 17 Act 18 Act
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
18 Bud 17 Act 18 Act
Page 4 of 14
9.a
Packet Pg. 46
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
M
o
n
t
h
l
y
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
1
4
8
1
:
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
)
Department 2018
Adj Budget
2018
YTD
2018
Est Actual
Variance
Favorable
(Unfavorable)
%Variance
Favorable
(Unfavorable)
City Council 409,150 302,131 368,900 40,250 9.8%
Mayor's Office/City Clerk 3,063,990 2,154,057 2,858,500 205,490 6.7%
Economic & Community Dev 7,305,340 5,548,523 6,898,300 407,040 5.6%
Finance 3,007,710 2,547,524 3,086,200 (78,490) -2.6%
Fire Contracted Services 3,657,530 2,887,297 3,984,633 (327,103) -8.9%
Human Resources 2,213,030 1,715,641 2,134,400 78,630 3.6%
Information Technology 519,450 420,485 507,686 11,764 2.3%
Law 1,777,920 1,384,364 1,746,000 31,920 1.8%
Municipal Court 3,405,030 2,771,474 3,374,100 30,930 0.9%
Parks, Recreation & Comm Svcs 18,588,507 14,623,273 18,184,200 404,307 2.2%
Police 38,863,160 32,008,568 39,222,500 (359,340) -0.9%
Public Works 1,318,470 939,252 1,195,500 122,970 9.3%
Non-Departmental 25,341,380 17,391,721 25,341,380
Total Expenditures 109,470,667 84,694,308 108,902,299 568,368 0.5%
October 2018 Monthly Financial Report
City of Kent, Washington
General Fund Overview - Expenditures
Variance analysis for expenditures is provided for particular departments or those in which the estimated actual
amount differs from the budgeted amount by at least 10% or a minimum of $500,000.
Variance Notes
None.
City Council
Mayor's Office/City
Clerk
3%
ECD
6%
Finance
3%
Fire Contracted
Services
4%
Human Resources
2%
I.T.
Law
2%
Municipal Court
3%
Parks, Recreation &
Comm Svcs
17%
Police
36%
Public Works
1%
Non-Departmental
23%
Other
8%
2018 Estimated General Fund Expenditures
Page 5 of 14
9.a
Packet Pg. 47
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
M
o
n
t
h
l
y
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
1
4
8
1
:
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
)
2016 2017 2018 2018 2018
Actual Actual Adj Budget YTD Est Actual
Beginning Fund Balance 15,372,499 19,987,828 21,595,175 21,595,175 21,595,175
Revenues
Taxes:
Property 22,534,441 22,999,864 29,532,710 28,332,144 29,546,710
Sales & Use 19,814,047 21,109,277 21,100,310 19,586,670 23,188,200
Utility 18,490,458 19,648,349 19,150,880 16,252,499 19,122,890
Business & Occupation 9,311,445 9,141,800 8,890,480 6,146,879 9,235,880
Other 961,833 900,663 879,260 719,074 1,030,470
Licenses and Permits 6,269,525 6,962,130 5,695,870 6,446,445 7,561,640
Intergovernmental Revenue 8,072,343 8,102,414 7,946,370 6,180,466 7,771,780
Charges for Services 5,363,205 7,328,567 5,844,610 5,747,278 6,834,280
Fines and Forfeitures 1,551,720 1,549,964 1,565,970 998,838 1,201,830
Miscellaneous Revenue 2,302,027 2,241,585 1,574,530 2,200,538 2,537,210
Transfers In 962,261 934,128 950,000 - 950,000
Total Revenues 95,633,303 100,918,740 103,130,990 92,610,831 108,980,890
Expenditures
City Council 337,355 349,577 409,150 302,131 368,900
Mayor's Office/City Clerk 2,339,581 2,745,792 3,063,990 2,154,057 2,858,500
Economic & Community Dev 5,521,764 5,841,098 7,305,340 5,548,523 6,898,300
Finance 2,751,128 2,522,554 3,007,710 2,547,524 3,086,200
Fire Contracted Services 3,556,484 3,668,180 3,657,530 2,887,297 3,984,633
Human Resources 1,733,010 1,835,276 2,213,030 1,715,641 2,134,400
Information Technology 509,617 521,151 519,450 420,485 507,686
Law 1,458,153 1,600,451 1,777,920 1,384,364 1,746,000
Municipal Court 3,079,215 3,128,652 3,405,030 2,771,474 3,374,100
Parks, Recreation & Comm Svcs 16,027,802 16,655,356 18,588,507 14,623,273 18,184,200
Police 35,155,894 37,167,622 38,863,160 32,008,568 39,222,500
Public Works 1,273,864 1,111,563 1,318,470 939,252 1,195,500
Non-Departmental 17,274,106 22,164,122 25,341,380 17,391,721 25,341,380
Total Expenditures 91,017,974 99,311,394 109,470,667 84,694,308 108,902,299
Net Revenues less Expenditures 4,615,329 1,607,347 (6,339,677) 7,916,523 78,591
Ending Fund Balance 19,987,828 21,595,175 15,255,498 29,511,698 21,673,766
Ending Fund Balance Detail:
General Fund Reserves 18,921,258 20,654,417 14,665,328 20,282,816
based on same year actuals/budget 20.8% 20.8% 13.4% 18.6%
Restricted for Annexation 1,066,570 940,759 590,170 1,390,950
October 2018 Monthly Financial Report
City of Kent, Washington
General Fund
Page 6 of 14
9.a
Packet Pg. 48
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
M
o
n
t
h
l
y
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
1
4
8
1
:
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
)
2016 2017 2018 % of
thru October thru October thru October Budget
Revenues
Taxes:
Property 20,966,065 21,390,522 28,332,144 6,941,622 32.5%95.9%
Sales & Use 16,199,025 17,370,268 19,586,670 2,216,402 12.8%92.8%
Utility 15,884,739 16,574,000 16,252,499 (321,500) -1.9%84.9%
Business & Occupation 6,594,028 6,376,999 6,146,879 (230,120) -3.6%69.1%
Other 679,016 578,955 719,074 140,119 24.2%81.8%
Licenses and Permits 4,912,867 5,539,604 6,446,445 906,841 16.4%113.2%
Intergovernmental Revenue 6,314,241 6,306,614 6,180,466 (126,148) -2.0%77.8%
Charges for Services 4,613,754 5,832,009 5,747,278 (84,731) -1.5%98.3%
Fines and Forfeitures 1,283,407 1,274,430 998,838 (275,592) -21.6%63.8%
Miscellaneous Revenue 1,568,633 1,783,004 2,200,538 417,534 23.4%139.8%
Transfers In 714,440 942 - (942) -100.0%
Total Revenues 79,730,214 83,027,347 92,610,831 9,583,484 11.5%89.8%
Expenditures
City Council 281,059 290,785 302,131 11,346 3.9%73.8%
Mayor's Office/City Clerk 1,802,381 1,850,254 2,154,057 303,802 16.4%70.3%
Economic & Community Dev 4,403,329 4,726,075 5,548,523 822,448 17.4%76.0%
Finance 2,242,315 2,058,921 2,547,524 488,604 23.7%84.7%
Fire Contracted Services 2,810,454 3,000,008 2,887,297 (112,710) -3.8%78.9%
Human Resources 1,329,643 1,464,936 1,715,641 250,705 17.1%77.5%
Information Technology 418,640 433,755 420,485 (13,270) -3.1%80.9%
Law 1,204,761 1,309,889 1,384,364 74,475 5.7%77.9%
Municipal Court 2,534,680 2,601,461 2,771,474 170,012 6.5%81.4%
Parks, Recreation & Comm Svcs 13,175,193 13,739,788 14,623,273 883,485 6.4%78.7%
Police 28,558,194 30,118,120 32,008,568 1,890,448 6.3%82.4%
Public Works 2,313,346 926,639 939,252 12,613 1.4%71.2%
Non-Departmental 11,642,387 14,155,707 17,391,721 3,236,015 22.9%68.6%
Total Expenditures 72,716,382 76,676,338 84,694,308 8,017,971 10.5%77.4%
*General Govt. includes City Council, Mayor/Clerk, HR, IT, & Finance
Variance
October 2018 Monthly Financial Report
City of Kent, Washington
General Fund
Year-to-Year Month Comparison
2018-17
0
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
Property
Taxes
Sales &
Use Taxes
Utility
Taxes
Other
Revenues
GF Revenues thru October
2016
2017
2018
0
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
35,000,000
Police Parks *General
Govt.
ECD Non-Dept
& Other
GF Expenditures thru October
2016
2017
2018
Page 7 of 14
9.a
Packet Pg. 49
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
M
o
n
t
h
l
y
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
1
4
8
1
:
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
)
2018 2018 2018 2018
Beginning
Fund Balance
Estimated
Revenues
Estimated
Expenditures
Ending Fund
Balance
Operating revenues and expenditures only; capital and non-capital projects are excluded.
General Fund 21,595,174 108,980,890 108,902,299 21,673,765
Street Fund 5,873,486 13,754,190 15,506,790 4,120,886
LEOFF 1 Retiree Benefits 1,296,372 2,083,600 1,400,000 1,979,972
Lodging Tax 457,557 292,360 452,750 297,167
Youth/Teen Programs 104,887 936,220 942,000 99,107
Capital Resources 15,646,334 21,914,930 23,280,430 14,280,834
Criminal Justice 7,197,004 4,650,000 4,806,560 7,040,444
ShoWare Operating 2,518,894 1,359,430 1,102,020 2,776,304
Other Operating 526,158 120,650 80,000 566,808
Councilmanic Debt Service 986,220 11,031,820 10,066,990 1,951,050
Special Assessments Debt Service 582,661 1,504,460 1,563,470 523,651
Water Utility 20,803,436 27,302,500 28,943,430 19,162,506
Sewer/Drainage Utility 24,390,396 55,822,350 54,000,000 26,212,746
Solid Waste Utility 479,431 757,900 807,330 430,001
Golf Complex (3,816,932) 9,269,630 6,939,040 (1,486,342)
Fleet Services 5,869,149 4,761,160 7,000,000 3,630,309
Central Services (3,113) 396,000 390,000 2,887
Information Technology 3,593,294 8,293,620 8,504,260 3,382,654
Facilities 2,316,961 5,472,660 5,300,000 2,489,621
Unemployment 1,424,508 123,900 176,730 1,371,678
Workers Compensation 2,374,326 1,135,000 2,532,430 976,896
Employee Health & Wellness 2,960,567 14,245,000 14,000,000 3,205,567
Liability Insurance 1,661,132 1,610,000 2,175,930 1,095,202
Property Insurance 652,035 575,600 526,490 701,145
General Fund
Special Revenue Funds
Debt Service Funds
Enterprise Funds
Internal Service Funds
Fund Balances
October 2018 Monthly Financial Report
City of Kent, Washington
Page 8 of 14
9.a
Packet Pg. 50
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
M
o
n
t
h
l
y
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
1
4
8
1
:
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
)
2016 2017 2018 2018 2018
Actual Actual Budget YTD Est Actual
Operating revenues and expenditures only; capital and non-capital projects are excluded.
In instances where expenditures exceed revenues, fund balance is being utilized.
Street Fund
Revenues 14,254,751 14,407,771 11,921,560 9,839,826 13,754,190
Expenditures 14,369,693 12,511,397 15,848,840 13,134,252 15,506,790
Net Revenues Less Expenditures (114,942)1,896,373 (3,927,280)(3,294,426)(1,752,600)
LEOFF 1 Retiree Benefits
Revenues 1,035,289 1,285,285 2,193,480 1,613,719 2,083,600
Expenditures 954,561 1,163,174 1,596,550 1,141,487 1,400,000
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 80,728 122,111 596,930 472,232 683,600
Lodging Tax
Revenues 294,859 316,975 286,610 269,573 292,360
Expenditures 219,989 328,804 452,750 338,786 452,750
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 74,870 (11,830)(166,140)(69,213)(160,390)
Youth/Teen Programs
Revenues 911,855 955,757 936,220 783,066 936,220
Expenditures 942,000 942,000 942,000 942,000
Net Revenues Less Expenditures (30,145)13,757 (5,780)783,066 (5,780)
Capital Resources
Revenues 20,751,646 19,948,247 18,806,830 16,107,652 21,914,930
Expenditures 15,248,984 15,579,639 23,280,430 14,012,482 23,280,430
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 5,502,662 4,368,607 (4,473,600)2,095,170 (1,365,500)
Criminal Justice
Revenues 4,873,770 6,032,589 4,200,900 4,148,038 4,650,000
Expenditures 3,157,680 4,533,302 4,306,560 3,785,088 4,806,560
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 1,716,090 1,499,287 (105,660)362,950 (156,560)
Budget change will be made in November to add a $500k transfer to facilities.
ShoWare Operating
Revenues 1,647,988 1,355,226 1,234,430 494,363 1,359,430
Expenditures 1,097,457 1,067,836 1,102,020 905,171 1,102,020
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 550,531 287,390 132,410 (410,808)257,410
Other Operating
Revenues 135,731 129,338 120,650 5,000 120,650
Expenditures 63,059 40,094 120,650 55,093 80,000
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 72,672 89,244 (50,093)40,650
Councilmanic Debt Service
Revenues 86,581,322 10,781,229 10,531,820 2,620,517 11,031,820
Expenditures 85,720,181 10,316,403 10,066,990 2,620,517 10,066,990
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 861,141 464,826 464,830 964,830
Special Assessment Debt Service
Revenues 2,151,133 1,979,573 1,504,460 876,348 1,504,460
Expenditures 3,032,661 2,585,818 1,563,470 937,117 1,563,470
Net Revenues Less Expenditures (881,528)(606,245)(59,010)(60,769)(59,010)
Debt Service Funds
October 2018 Monthly Financial Report
City of Kent, Washington
Other Funds Overview (Revenues and Expenditures)
Special Revenue Funds
2018 estimated expenditures higher due to increased long-term care costs.
Page 9 of 14
9.a
Packet Pg. 51
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
M
o
n
t
h
l
y
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
1
4
8
1
:
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
)
2016 2017 2018 2018 2018
Actual Actual Budget YTD Est Actual
Operating revenues and expenditures only; capital and non-capital projects are excluded.
In instances where expenditures exceed revenues, fund balance is being utilized.
October 2018 Monthly Financial Report
City of Kent, Washington
Other Funds Overview (Revenues and Expenditures)
Water Utility
Revenues 24,526,000 28,209,235 25,718,320 23,257,215 27,302,500
Expenditures 21,654,832 26,577,932 28,943,430 22,416,767 28,943,430
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 2,871,168 1,631,303 (3,225,110)840,448 (1,640,930)
Sewer/Drainage Utility
Revenues 53,289,642 54,240,288 53,455,350 46,661,100 55,822,350
Expenditures 50,599,649 49,060,469 57,617,920 47,119,193 54,000,000
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 2,689,993 5,179,819 (4,162,570)(458,093)1,822,350
Solid Waste Utility
Revenues 774,072 754,868 749,500 609,698 757,900
Expenditures 471,180 577,964 807,330 634,771 807,330
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 302,892 176,904 (57,830)(25,073)(49,430)
Golf Complex
Revenues 2,475,682 3,027,079 9,788,390 9,048,385 9,269,630
Expenditures 3,188,762 3,081,308 6,939,044 6,069,564 6,939,040
Net Revenues Less Expenditures (713,080)(54,229)2,849,346 2,978,821 2,330,590
Fleet Services
Revenues 4,769,001 5,480,210 4,761,160 4,187,812 4,761,160
Expenditures 3,974,431 4,164,630 9,119,000 5,971,992 7,000,000
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 794,570 1,315,580 (4,357,840)(1,784,180)(2,238,840)
Central Services
Revenues 382,444 350,602 449,310 317,743 396,000
Expenditures 399,786 290,147 421,150 316,146 390,000
Net Revenues Less Expenditures (17,342)60,455 28,160 1,597 6,000
Information Technology
Revenues 7,717,834 8,173,478 8,137,635 6,939,970 8,293,620
Expenditures 6,905,076 8,175,302 8,706,380 7,144,464 8,504,260
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 812,757 (1,824)(568,745)(204,494)(210,640)
Facilities
Revenues 5,556,854 4,737,520 4,904,580 4,115,369 5,472,660
Expenditures 4,881,741 4,761,950 5,142,110 4,055,968 5,300,000
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 675,113 (24,429)(237,530)59,401 172,660
Budget change will be made in November to add $500k for corrections plumbing repairs.
Unemployment
Revenues 420,226 167,215 121,700 130,490 123,900
Expenditures 126,718 75,154 171,990 176,727 176,730
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 293,508 92,061 (50,290)(46,237)(52,830)
Workers Compensation
Revenues 1,200,476 1,082,091 1,664,800 959,980 1,135,000
Expenditures 1,436,775 1,013,278 2,532,430 1,973,393 2,532,430
Net Revenues Less Expenditures (236,299)68,813 (867,630)(1,013,413)(1,397,430)
Enterprise Funds
Internal Service Funds
Note: Golf revenues include proceeds from the sale of land of $500k in 2017 and $6m in 2018. 2018 Exp include
$3.2m transfer to Capital Projects
Page 10 of 14
9.a
Packet Pg. 52
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
M
o
n
t
h
l
y
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
1
4
8
1
:
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
)
2016 2017 2018 2018 2018
Actual Actual Budget YTD Est Actual
Operating revenues and expenditures only; capital and non-capital projects are excluded.
In instances where expenditures exceed revenues, fund balance is being utilized.
October 2018 Monthly Financial Report
City of Kent, Washington
Other Funds Overview (Revenues and Expenditures)
Employee Health & Wellness
Revenues 10,688,926 11,707,967 13,995,990 11,638,709 14,245,000
Expenditures 12,130,696 13,428,552 14,629,950 10,886,946 14,000,000
Net Revenues Less Expenditures (1,441,770)(1,720,584)(633,960)751,763 245,000
Liability Insurance
Revenues 1,447,027 2,087,755 1,810,060 1,682,383 1,610,000
Expenditures 2,145,627 2,180,680 2,175,930 1,853,765 2,175,930
Net Revenues Less Expenditures (698,600)(92,925)(365,870)(171,382)(565,930)
Property Insurance
Revenues 628,105 556,770 565,920 491,184 575,600
Expenditures 445,135 436,283 526,490 609,395 526,490
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 182,970 120,487 39,430 (118,210)49,110
0
10,000,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
40,000,000
50,000,000
60,000,000
70,000,000
80,000,000
90,000,000
100,000,000
2016
Actuals
2017
Actuals
2018
Budget
2018
Est.
Actuals
Other Fund Revenues
Special
Revenue
Funds
Enterprise
Funds
Internal
Service
Funds
0
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
35,000,000
40,000,000
45,000,000
50,000,000
General Fund Special Revenue
Funds
Enterprise Funds Internal Service
Funds
2018 Estimated Fund Balances
Beginning
Balance
Estimated
Ending Balance
0
10,000,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
40,000,000
50,000,000
60,000,000
70,000,000
80,000,000
90,000,000
100,000,000
2016
Actuals
2017
Actuals
2018
Budget
2018
Est.
Actuals
Other Fund Expenditures
Special
Revenue
Funds
Enterprise
Funds
Internal
Service Funds
Page 11 of 14
9.a
Packet Pg. 53
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
M
o
n
t
h
l
y
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
1
4
8
1
:
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
)
2016 2017 2018
thru October thru October thru October
Operating revenues and expenditures only; capital and non-capital projects are excluded.
Street Fund
Revenues 12,177,713 9,380,309 9,839,826 459,517 4.9%
Expenditures 10,952,025 9,914,583 13,134,252 3,219,669 32.5%
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 1,225,688 (534,274)(3,294,426)
LEOFF 1 Retiree Benefits
Revenues 893,614 823,508 1,613,719 790,212 96.0%
Expenditures 789,439 967,531 1,141,487 173,956 18.0%
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 104,175 (144,023)472,232
2016 revenues reflect a timing difference because of revenues that were not booked until June.
Lodging Tax
Revenues 242,297 260,444 269,573 9,128 3.5%
Expenditures 194,462 261,741 338,786 77,044 29.4%
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 47,835 (1,297)(69,213)
Youth/Teen Programs
Revenues 762,805 806,214 783,066 (23,149)-2.9%
Expenditures 714,440
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 48,365 806,214 783,066
Capital Resources
Revenues 13,409,539 14,162,090 16,107,652 1,945,562 13.7%
Expenditures 6,833,125 6,395,514 14,012,482 7,616,967
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 6,576,415 7,766,576 2,095,170
Criminal Justice
Revenues 4,140,479 5,122,839 4,148,038 (974,801)-19.0%
Expenditures 2,561,408 3,520,911 3,785,088 264,176 7.5%
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 1,579,071 1,601,928 362,950
ShoWare Operating
Revenues 1,485,913 214,460 494,363 279,902 130.5%
Expenditures 663,755 1,065,632 905,171 (160,461)-15.1%
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 822,158 (851,171)(410,808)
Admissions Tax revenues received quarterly (April, July, September, January)
Other Operating
Revenues 5,000 5,000
Expenditures 62,949 27,765 55,093 27,328 98.4%
Net Revenues Less Expenditures (62,949)(27,765)(50,093)
Combines several small programs, including City Art Program and Neighborhood Matching Grants
Special Revenue Funds
Variance
October 2018 Monthly Financial Report
City of Kent, Washington
Other Funds Overview (Revenues and Expenditures)
Year-to-Year Month Comparison
2018-17
Page 12 of 14
9.a
Packet Pg. 54
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
M
o
n
t
h
l
y
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
1
4
8
1
:
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
)
2016 2017 2018
thru October thru October thru October
Operating revenues and expenditures only; capital and non-capital projects are excluded.
Variance
October 2018 Monthly Financial Report
City of Kent, Washington
Other Funds Overview (Revenues and Expenditures)
Year-to-Year Month Comparison
2018-17
Councilmanic Debt Service
Revenues 78,737,078 2,721,443 2,620,517 (100,926)-3.7%
Expenditures 78,679,169 2,721,443 2,620,517 (100,926)-3.7%
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 57,909
Debt service payments are generally due in June and December.
Special Assessments Debt Service
Revenues 1,464,100 1,298,035 876,348 (421,687)-32.5%
Expenditures 428,767 1,962,758 937,117 (1,025,642)-52.3%
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 1,035,333 (664,724)(60,769)
Water Utility
Revenues 20,069,834 22,606,396 23,257,215 650,819 2.9%
Expenditures 16,819,830 21,639,171 22,416,767 777,596 3.6%
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 3,250,004 967,225 840,448
Sewer/Drainage Utility
Revenues 41,836,083 43,786,109 46,661,100 2,874,992 6.6%
Expenditures 42,126,578 39,628,801 47,119,193 7,490,392 18.9%
Net Revenues Less Expenditures (290,496)4,157,308 (458,093)
Solid Waste Utility
Revenues 593,687 592,980 609,698 16,718 2.8%
Expenditures 388,264 437,454 634,771 197,316 45.1%
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 205,423 155,525 (25,073)
Golf Complex
Revenues 2,264,734 2,723,593 9,048,385 6,324,792 232.2%
Expenditures 2,697,088 2,363,730 6,069,564 3,705,834 156.8%
Net Revenues Less Expenditures (432,355)359,863 2,978,821
2017 revenues down due to inclement weather conditions in Q1. 2018 includes $6m sale of land.
Fleet Services
Revenues 3,987,732 4,104,584 4,187,812 83,228 2.0%
Expenditures 3,194,000 2,972,222 5,971,992 2,999,770 100.9%
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 793,732 1,132,362 (1,784,180)
Central Services
Revenues 323,366 288,325 317,743 29,417 10.2%
Expenditures 310,160 235,739 316,146 80,407 34.1%
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 13,206 52,586 1,597
Debt Service Funds
Enterprise Funds
Internal Service Funds
Page 13 of 14
9.a
Packet Pg. 55
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
M
o
n
t
h
l
y
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
1
4
8
1
:
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
)
2016 2017 2018
thru October thru October thru October
Operating revenues and expenditures only; capital and non-capital projects are excluded.
Variance
October 2018 Monthly Financial Report
City of Kent, Washington
Other Funds Overview (Revenues and Expenditures)
Year-to-Year Month Comparison
2018-17
Information Technology
Revenues 6,379,036 6,732,124 6,939,970 207,845 3.1%
Expenditures 4,714,931 6,781,445 7,144,464 363,019 5.4%
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 1,664,105 (49,321)(204,494)
Facilities
Revenues 4,481,243 3,928,388 4,115,369 186,981 4.8%
Expenditures 4,047,295 3,977,017 4,055,968 78,951 2.0%
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 433,948 (48,629)59,401
Unemployment
Revenues 347,915 142,451 130,490 (11,960)-8.4%
Expenditures 119,965 54,278 176,727 122,449 225.6%
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 227,950 88,173 (46,237)
Workers Compensation
Revenues 1,029,864 899,210 959,980 60,770 6.8%
Expenditures 737,681 823,271 1,973,393 1,150,122 139.7%
Net Revenues Less Expenditures 292,184 75,938 (1,013,413)
Employee Health & Wellness
Revenues 8,589,801 9,899,034 11,638,709 1,739,675 17.6%
Expenditures 9,754,941 10,713,806 10,886,946 173,140 1.6%
Net Revenues Less Expenditures (1,165,140)(814,772)751,763
Liability Insurance
Revenues 1,002,945 1,874,517 1,682,383 (192,134)-10.2%
Expenditures 1,823,168 2,565,028 1,853,765 (711,263)-27.7%
Net Revenues Less Expenditures (820,222)(690,511)(171,382)
Property Insurance
Revenues 510,675 466,587 491,184 24,597 5.3%
Expenditures 650,142 609,454 609,395 (59)0.0%
Net Revenues Less Expenditures (139,467)(142,866)(118,210)
0
10,000,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
40,000,000
50,000,000
60,000,000
70,000,000
80,000,000
90,000,000
Special Revenue FundsEnterprise FundsInternal Service Funds
Other Fund Revenues thru
October
2016
2017
2018
0
10,000,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
40,000,000
50,000,000
60,000,000
70,000,000
80,000,000
90,000,000
Special
Revenue Funds
Enterprise
Funds
Internal Service
Funds
Other Fund Expenditures thru
October
2016
2017
2018
Page 14 of 14
9.a
Packet Pg. 56
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
M
o
n
t
h
l
y
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
1
4
8
1
:
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
)