The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 10/16/2018adccW20686_9_18 CITY OF KENT Council MeetingAgenda Mayor Dana Ralph Council President Bill Boyce Councilmembers Brenda Fincher Dennis Higgins Satwinder Kaur Marli Larimer Les Thomas Toni Troutner October 16, 2018 This page intentionally left blank. KENT CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS October 16, 2018 Council Chambers Mayor Dana Ralph Council President Bill Boyce Councilmember Brenda Fincher Councilmember Dennis Higgins Councilmember Satwinder Kaur Councilmember Marli Larimer Councilmember Les Thomas Councilmember Toni Troutner ******************************************************************** WORKSHOP AGENDA 5 p.m. Subject Speaker Time 2019-2020 Biennial Budget Process Aaron BeMiller 90 min Barbara Lopez COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA 7 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2. ROLL CALL 3. AGENDA APPROVAL Changes from Council, Administration, or Staff 4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A. Public Recognition i. Proclamation for Fire Prevention Month ii. Introduction of New Parks and Recreation Commission Board Members B. Community Events C. Public Safety Report 5. REPORTS FROM COUNCIL AND STAFF 6. PUBLIC HEARING A. Second Public Hearing on the 2019-2020 Biennial Budget B. Second Public Hearing on the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Plan C. Public Hearing on the 2018 Property Tax Levy for the 2019 Budget D. Public Hearing on the Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Capital Facilities Element to Adopt School District Capital Facilities Plans 7. PUBLIC COMMENT - The Public Comment period is your opportunity to speak to the Council and Mayor on issues that relate to the business of the city of Kent. Comments that do not relate to the business of the city of Kent are not permitted. Additionally, the state of Washington prohibits people from using this Public Comment period to support or oppose a ballot measurement or candidate for office. If you wish to speak to the Mayor or Council, please sign up at the City Clerk’s table adjacent to the podium. When called to speak, please state your name and address for the record. You will have up to three minutes to provide comment. Please address all comments to the Mayor or the Council as a whole. The Mayor and Council may not be in a position to answer questions during the meeting. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Minutes of October 2, 2018 City Council Meeting; October 6, 2018 Special Workshop; and October 9, 2018 Special Workshop – Approve B. Payment of Bills – Approve C. Set Public Hearing Date on the Development Agreement with Sound Transit - Approve D. Appointments to the Parks and Recreation Commission - Confirm E. Downey and Naden Clearing and Grading Change Order – Authorize F. 2018 Annual Docket – Approve 9. OTHER BUSINESS 10. BIDS 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION AND ACTION AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION 12. ADJOURNMENT NOTE: A copy of the full agenda is available in the City Clerk's Office and at KentWA.gov. Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City Clerk's Office in advance at 253-856-5725. For TDD relay service, call the Washington Telecommunications Relay Service at 7-1-1. WORKSHOP A) 2019-2020 Biennial Budget Process/Aaron BeMiller This page intentionally left blank. AGENDA APPROVAL Changes from Council, Administration, or Staff This page intentionally left blank. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A) Public Recognition i. Proclamation for Fire Prevention Month ii. Introduction of New Parks and Recreation Commission Members B) Community Events C) Public Safety Report This page intentionally left blank. PROCLAMATTON WHEREAI the city of Kent is committed to ensuring the safety and security of all those living in and visiting Kent; and WHEREAS, home fires killed 2,735 people in the United States in 2016, according to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), and fire departments in the United States responded to 352,000 home fires; and WHEREAS, the majority of U,S. fire deaths (4 out of 5) occur at home each year - the fire death rate per 1000 home fires reported to U,S. fire departments was 10 percent higher in 2016 than in 1980; and WHEREA$ Kent residents should identify places in their home where fires can start and eliminate those hazards and ensure working smoke alarms are in every sleeping room, outside each separate sleeping area, and on every level of the home; and WHEREAfl Kent residents who have planned and practiced a home fire escape plan are more prepared and will therefore be more likely to survive a fire; and WHEREAS, the Regional Fire Authority's first responders are dedicated to reducing the occurrence of home fires and home fire injuries through prevention and protection education; and WHEREAS, the 2018 Fire Prevention Month theme, "Look, Listen. Learn. Be aware - fire can happen anywhere"" effectively serves to remind us that we need to take personal steps to increase our safety from fire. NOW, THEREFORE, I, DANA RALPH, Mayor of the city of Kent, do hereby proclaim October 2018 as Fire Prevention Month and urge all Kent residents to be aware of their surroundings, look for available ways out in the event of a fire or other emergency, respond when the smoke alarm sounds by exiting the building immediately and to support the many public safety activities and efforts of the Regional Fire Authority's fire and emergency services during Fire Prevention Month 2018. Dated this 16th day of October, 2018 KENT WasHrNclox ana Ralph, M This page intentionally left blank. REPORTS FROM COUNCIL AND STAFF Mayor Ralph: Derek Matheson/Administration: Council President Boyce: Councilmember Fincher: Councilmember Higgins: Councilmember Kaur: Councilmember Larimer: Councilmember Thomas: Councilmember Troutner: This page intentionally left blank. Page 1 of 11 OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Derek Matheson, Chief Administrative Officer Phone: 253-856-5700 Fax: 253-856-6700 Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, WA. 98032-5895 DATE: 10/16/18 TO: Mayor Ralph Councilmembers FROM: Derek Matheson, Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: CAO Report for Tuesday, October 16, 2018 The Chief Administrative Officer’s report is intended to provide Council, staff and community an update on the activities of the City of Kent. ADMINISTRATION • The Saturday, October 6, all-day budget workshop was a big success. The council remains on track to adopt a budget on November 20. • Puget Sound Energy has expressed interest in new franchise agreements for power and natural gas. The power franchise expired in March and the gas franchise in 2006 though both technically remain in effect because both parties continue to honor their provisions. • The CAO, fire chief, and attorneys have begun to put pencil to paper to update the interlocal agreement between the City of Kent and Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority. Communications • Lobbyist Briahna Murry and communications manager Dana Neuts met with departments to discuss 2019 legislative priorities. They are preparing a draft to present to the mayor and CAO for consideration, before submitting to the Operations Committee and City Council for adoption. We continue to support KDP in its bid to win $150,000 for partial restoration of the Morrill Bank building. Vote daily at VoteYourMainStreet.org/Kent. Other communications activities include outreach for the resident survey, PIO training and attendance at an AWC communicators roundtable. Please tune into Q13 the week of October 15 for a series of stories on Kent. Community Engagement • Community engagement coordinator Uriel Varela worked with Q13 Fox to highlight the diversity in Kent. Two Cultural Communities Board members were interviewed for the piece, which will air next week. Uriel will be leading a field session into the City of Kent during the National Main Street conference in Seattle next March. The focus will be on how nonprofits, schools, and city government work together to transform the lives of refugees and immigrants by providing pathways to sustainable employment through the food industries. Ubuntu Street Café will be one of the stops along the four-stop tour. Uriel is also working with a Latino group from Holy Spirit Page 2 of 11 Church to coordinate the first Día de los Muertos (Day of the Dead) celebration in the area. The community event is scheduled for Saturday, November 3 and will feature temporary Altares (Shrines), which are offerings to loved ones who have passed on. Neighborhood Program • At the October 2 Kent City Council meeting, the Kent Neighborhood Program formally recognized the West Hill Cambridge neighborhood as the 40th neighborhood council. • The Neighborhood Program received seven Matching Grant applications. Staff is in the process of reviewing and preparing the grant agreements. Announcements of neighborhoods and projects are coming soon. ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Economic Development • Staff attended the Aerospace Futures Alliance 13th Annual Aerospace Summit in Lynnwood Washington, and the first such summit of employers and interested aerospace industry stakeholders since their merger with the Washington State Space Coalition. • Staff is talking with Green River College and Aerospace Futures Alliance about hosting a jobs fair in downtown Kent in early 2019. • Economic Development staff accompanied Mayor Ralph and Auburn Mayor Nancy Backus on a tour of Delta Air Lines TechOps Hangar to learn more about their hiring capabilities and discuss opportunities to promote careers in aerospace maintenance. • The first application periods for tourism promotion grants has now closed. The Lodging Tax Advisory Committee will have 30+ proposals with a total $ ask of over 1.5 million to consider funding in the interest of drawing visitors and their dollars to Kent. The first LTAC meeting to review the applications is scheduled for Oct. 29, at 4pm. Economic development is assisting the committee with cataloguing and evaluation criteria. Code Enforcement • Code Enforcement staff recently worked with the property owner of a perpetually non- compliant commercial property on 108th Ave. SE to clean up a large amount of junk and debris. • Code Enforcement staff received training from the Police Department on use of the Tiburon system to support filing civil infractions with the Municipal Court. Long Range Planning • The City of Kent hosted the King County Cities Climate Collaboration (K4C) Elected Officials Summit. Elected officials from cities throughout King County - K4C members and non-members - convened to discuss shared priorities on climate change issues. ECD staff attended the summit. • Staff attended the two-day APA Washington conference in Spokane, Washington. Conference topics included reinventing auto-centric neighborhoods, planning for Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), best practices for code-writing, and the ethics of street design. • Staff worked with Kent Downtown Partnership to finalize a contract with SJM Cultural Resource Services to prepare a historical report and King County landmark designation application for the lunar rovers currently on the surface of the moon, which were built in Kent and launched during NASA’s Apollo missions. The final report and application will be presented in the summer of 2019. Page 3 of 11 HUMAN RESOURCES Administration • On Oct. 18 at 10:18 a.m., the City will participate in the annual “Great Shake Out” exercise, joining millions of people on the West Coast to practice earthquake safety actions: Drop, Cover, and Hold On. This year we will be testing a new alert and notification system for city employees, using the ShoreTel phone system to alert city staff of an emergency situation. The employee alert/notification system is a key component to provide for ongoing employee safety. Benefits • Preparations and system testing for Benefits Open Enrollment continue. • Planning for the new onboarding process for temporary employees continue. • Implementation of the requirements for the new state Paid Family Medical Leave process continues. • Contract terms and implementation plans for ACA Tracking and Reporting are being developed. • Focus groups and finalist interviews will be held in early November as part of the Request for Proposals (RFP) process to select a new provider for the City’s Wellness Program. • Interviews are being scheduled as part of the RFP process to select a 457 Plan Administrator. Recruitment • Paralegal & Policy Analyst finalist interviews were held on Oct. 10. • Entry Level Corrections Officer and Entry Level Police Officer testing was conducted on Oct. 12. • Code Enforcement Officer testing was held on Oct. 11. • New Hires for Oct. 16: Aaron Hodgins (Customer Service Representative), Rose Dolan (Judicial Specialist), and Stephanie Gurr (Permit Technician). • Promotions effective Oct. 16: Jacob Wallace (Maintenance Worker II in Utilities) and Matt Watson (Maintenance Worker II in Utilities). Labor • KPOA collective bargaining negotiations will continue on Oct. 23. • New and updated policies from Finance are under review. • Research on reclassification requests from Finance continue. • Teamsters vote on MOU for upfitting police vehicles passed on Sept. 25. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY • Merchant Bank Card Service Fees - The City of Kent pays a 2.07% Merchant Service Fee on current CC/Debit Card transactions. The Merchant Fees are paid to US Bank at an average sum of $450,000. These monies are paid out of the City’s General fund. The project objective will be to identify a solution to recoup sunk costs. • Crystal Report Server 2012 Replacement -Upgrade Enterprise Crystal Report Server and migration reports of old server that is at end of life. • Information Technology operational support for Sept. 25 to Oct. 9 o Number of tickets opened – 401; number of tickets closed - 405 Page 4 of 11 LAW • Continued to assist the Clerk’s office with public records requests, HR with a number of complicated and sensitive employment issues, and Public Works, ECD, and Parks with a number of high priority development projects, including various Sound Transit matters. • Three code enforcement hearings were conducted on Oct. 3, which resulted in the following: o 23221 Pacific Hwy S – Vacant Burger King building covered in graffiti. At the hearing, the owner testified a new tenant should be occupying the location soon and future demolition is currently anticipated. To allow time for the new tenant’s occupancy and the necessary permit process, the City and the property owner agreed the graffiti would be painted over in 30 days, a fence installed in 60 days, and a trespass agreement would be signed with KPD in 3 days. A $500 fine imposed, with $400 of that fine suspended pending full compliance within 60 days. If full compliance is obtained, the maximum fine due will be $100. If full compliance is not obtained, the full $500 will be due. o 28015 153rd Ave SE – Inoperable vehicle and shed built too close to property line. Both violations remain and the violator failed to appear after having requested the hearing. A default order was entered, the full fine of $1,000 was imposed and the violator was ordered to reimburse the City for its costs. City staff will pursue additional code enforcement remedies to gain compliance, including filing a civil infraction through Kent Municipal Court. o 26452 104th Ave SE – three inoperable vehicles, parking on the lawn, tall weeds and grass, no garbage service, accumulation of litter, trash and refuse. Prior to the hearing, the violator remedied the tall weeds and grass violation. At the hearing, the violator stated medical issues kept him from complying in time and he asked for more time to comply. The parties agreed the violator would obtain garbage service within one week and would have an additional six weeks to correct the other violations. The full $3,500 fine was imposed, with $2800 of that fine suspended pending full compliance within six weeks. If full compliance is obtained, the maximum fine is $700. If full compliance is not obtained the full fine of $3,500 will be due. • Successfully negotiated a settlement with a telecommunications company that installed unauthorized facilities within the City’s rights-of-way. The company agreed to pay the City a monetary fee and to provide the City with dark fiber strands. • During the October Jury term, the prosecution team had 89 cases set for trial. Of those cases, six were confirmed for trial, and 61 cases resulted in pleas of guilty. • Negotiated policies relating to body worn and in car cameras for the Police Department. • Responded to council regarding an incident at Wilson Playfields regarding a dispute between two individuals, the display of a handgun, and whether criminal charges were warranted against the person who displayed the handgun. • Began the legal analysis of the impact of the King County Executives order regarding inquest proceedings. • Analyzed the legal impact of the FCC’s new rules surrounding small cell deployment. • Conducted interviews of candidates to fill the open civil paralegal and policy analyst position. • Assisted HR and Administration in the legal process and available options for employees impacted by a reduction in force. • Worked with the Clerk’s Office to generate budget notices of hearing. • Assisted PW in refuting a claim regarding the vacation of City right-of-way at the corner of W Smith Street and N Lincoln Ave. Page 5 of 11 • Assisted ECD/PW in negotiations with Sound Transit regarding the Federal Way Link Extension development agreement and transit way agreement. • Assisted Parks in drafting the Riverbend Golf Complex restaurant lease. PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY SERVICES Human Services • Staff attended the Northwest Association of Community Development Managers (NWACDM) conference in SeaTac. The Association is a membership organization comprised of CDBG and HOME entitlement communities from Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. The primary goal of the Association is to share information between members to allow each community to better implement is community development and housing programs. The conference includes a valuable Q & A with HUD representatives on issues and challenges related to administering programs, as well as an open forum between members. • Staff attended the 25th annual affordable housing conference in Tacoma. Housing Washington is a nationally recognized annual conference on affordable housing that includes learning, discussion, networking and collaboration. Keynote speakers included Former US Secretary of HUD, Henry Cisneros, Chris Herbert, Managing Director of the Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University, and Mauricio Miller, Author of “The Alternative, Most of What You Believe About Poverty is Wrong.” Topics included: Meeting the Needs of an Aging Population, Fixing Housing Gaps for the Most Vulnerable Populations, Rising Homelessness, Suburbanization of Poverty, and a State Legislative Roundtable. Recreation • Hogan Park @ Russell Road hosted the United States Specialty Sports Association Men’s ‘D’ Western World Softball Tournament September 27-30, 2018. This four-day, 147 game event, included 75 teams from Washington, Oregon, California, Idaho, Nevada, Arizona, Colorado, Utah, New Mexico, Texas, Indiana. Over 1,100 participants and an estimated 5,000 spectators, filled hotels, ate in local restaurants and shopped daily. These events place a very positive spotlight on our city while providing a significant economic impact to the Kent community. • Staff dealt with a challenging and threatening issue during the youth soccer program at Wilson Playfield on Sept. 29. It started out as a personal issue between a legal document server and the person being served and became very public when a firearm was drawn in the presence of hundreds of kids and spectators. The situation was resolved without incident thanks to the quick actions of an off-duty Auburn Police officer and Kent PD. Parks Staff managed communications throughout the week in order to accurately share what had occurred while dispelling rumors and fear. Senior Activity Center • The Kent Senior Activity Center was selected by the Washington Secretary of State’s office to host a Consumer Protection Washington Senior Fraud Expo on Sept. 28. Informational booths were hosted by State government workers from the following agencies: Attorney General’s Office, Corporations and Charities Division, Department of Financial Services, Federal Trade Commission, Dept. of Labor and Industries, Office of the Insurance Commissioner, US Postal Inspection Services and the Utilities and Transportation Commission. Six workshops were also presented free of charge to inform participants how to protect themselves from frauds, scams and identity theft. • The Kent Senior Center hosts the only weekly ongoing senior dance program in the region. This very popular program has met every Tuesday afternoon and evening for the past 13 years. It features swing dance music provided be the 17-piece authentic Page 6 of 11 “Big Band” appropriately named “The Kings of Swing” along with other popular dance music provided by Randy Litch, Charlie Brown and Ron Bolin, the Dancin’ DJ. All ages are welcome. • The Kent Senior Activity Center, along with the Kent Regional Library, hosted their second Seattle Theatre Group Dance Workshop on Oct. 5. These highly regarded workshops feature routines based on Paramount Theatre Musical Productions. The most recent STG Broadway workshop featured “On Your Feet,” a musical about Gloria Estefan’s career. Popular instructor, Nikki Long, is a nationally known professional Broadway dancer and former member of the Radio City Rockettes, who now resides in Seattle. Over 80 dancers have participated in these dance workshops. Youth-Teen-Adaptive • The “World Wide Day of Play,” was held at the Kent Parks & Recreation Teen Center on Sept. 29. The purpose of this “Nickelodeon” sponsored event was to get families to turn off computers, televisions and video games and go outside to play. Over 80 youth, teens and parents participated throughout the evening. Families played, laughed, moved, and engaged with one another during basketball, soccer, beach ball volleyball, a unique hula hoop game of “team” rock, paper, scissors, parachute popcorn and more. Staff even managed to introduce participants to some healthy and nutritious snacks. • Adaptive Recreation continues to expand classes that support fitness, self-esteem and balance of life. This past week a new Yoga and Relaxation class was added to enhance already popular classes such as Flexi Fit, Pole Walking and Special Olympic sports. This particular yoga class has been adapted to fit the individual needs of the participants. POLICE Significant crime activities/arrests/investigations • On Sept. 27, members of SOU responded to a welfare check at the Kent Senior center regarding a young couple with a baby living in their car. SOU was able to immediately get them off the streets and into a shelter that day. The family was transferred to long-term housing the next day. • On Sept. 30, officers responded to a shooting that occurred at the Waterford at the Lakes Apartments. A 14-year-old female was shot in the lower abdomen. We learned the suspect had opened the door (which is kept unlocked) and fired a single shot into the apartment, striking the female. Officers located one .22 casing on the landing of the apartment. Officers also learned her brother had been shot in Auburn about three weeks ago. (Possible gang ties) No suspect description currently. The female was transported via Medics to Harborview Hospital with non-life-threatening injuries. • On Oct. 6, officers were dispatched to the report of a vehicle vs. pedestrian collision that occurred in the 21200 block of 108th Av SE. A bystander started CPR on the pedestrian, but the female did not make it. The driver was arrested for DUI. Investigation revealed the incident started as a DV. One of the witnesses was the boyfriend of the deceased. She accused him of cheating on her at their residence. The boyfriend left the residence since he didn't want to get in an argument. The victim followed him outside and stood behind his vehicle. He decided to walk away. The victim repeatedly hit him with a meat tenderizer hammer on the arm. The boyfriend walked away down 108th and the victim followed him. He looked back and saw that she was lying in the middle of the road. He walked back to get her out of the road but was unable to so he stood in front of her and waved at the oncoming car to stop. The car did not stop and struck and killed her. Traffic investigation revealed it appeared she had been lying flat on the road when she was struck. Page 7 of 11 • On Oct. 8, officers responded to a robbery at the Arco Station on West Meeker Street. Two male suspects entered business with handguns demanding money and credit cards. These suspects might be associated with five other robberies that have occurred in Federal Way over the last month. Detectives are looking into it. Major emphasis patrol • The Special Operations Unit spent nearly two weeks cleaning up a large homeless encampment at Salt Air Park. They also posted instructions to vacate premises within 48 hours at a transient camp at Pine Tree Elementary 20 yards from the playground and three camps at Riverview park and arrested a subject for trespassing. SOU has worked with this subject before and even obtained him his own apartment but he was kicked out for his behavior and is back on the streets in Kent. Events and awards • SOU participated in a Bicycle rodeo at Emerald Park elementary. SOU Officers explained the importance of bicycle safety and gave a demonstration on advanced bicycle skills. • Letters of Commendation: o Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Herschkowitz relayed high praises about Officer Erin Bratlien in regard to a carjacking case from July 7, 2018. DPA Herschkowtz’s compliment of Ofc Bratlien’s case is considered a very high compliment. Officer Bratlien was commended for a professional investigation that brought a suspect to justice and positive credit to the Kent Police Department. o On August 8, 2018, Officer Sean Goforth was dispatched to an order violation at Kent Shires. During his investigation he learned that the suspect had placed a GPS tracking device on the victim’s vehicle. Officer Goforth got three search warrants; one for the data card located inside the tracking, one to obtain digital records from the device’s manufacturing company and another for the suspect’s cell phone. The digital records proved the tracking device was paid for and owned by the suspect. The suspect was arrested. o On August 14, 2018, Officer Jonathan Johnson responded to a domestic assault in progress at the Riverwood Apartments. The suspect, armed with a sledgehammer, had chased his wife and inflicted significant facial injuries. The suspect attempted to breach the front door of the victim's apartment, where the victim's numerous young children were present inside, while stating that he would kill his wife. Seeing the immediate risk to life, Officer Johnson did not delay and confronted the suspect prior to other officers arriving. The suspect indicated he wanted Officer Johnson to kill him. Officer Blake arrived shortly thereafter. Officers Johnson and Blake remained calm and collected. They were able to successfully convince the suspect to drop the hammer and surrender. The suspect was booked on multiple felony charges. o On September 1, 2018, Officers Peter Stewart, Tom Riener and Cory Eaton were dispatched to a suspicious male who was running into traffic, removing his clothing and behaving in a way that appeared as though was high on drugs or suffering from a mental health condition. Officer Stewart calmly and tactfully verbally confronted him from a distance. When back up arrived, Officer Stewart challenged him, and the subject refused to obey commands. The subject turned aggressively toward the officers. Officer Stewart didn't hesitate and deployed the TASER. As soon as the suspect fell to the ground, Officers Stewart, Riener, and Eaton began to swarm him. This suspect had eyes bulging out of his head and was clearly in a state of Excited De lirium. The subject was taken to the hospital. Page 8 of 11 o On September 11, 2018, Officer Brian Cortinas handled a lost property call at McDonald's on SE 256th St. Employees called 911 due to a customer leaving a loaded 9mm pistol magazine inside the restaurant. Officer Cortinas went to the suspect’s work site, a convicted felon who had active warrants, and arrested him. The suspect admitted to possession of both the pistol and a rifle at his apartment in Renton. Officer Cortinas wrote, got approved, and executed a search warrant for his residence and recovered the pistol and rifle. Consequently, the suspect was booked for two counts of unlawful possession of a firearm and his outstanding warrants. • Diversity Task Force meeting on Body Worn Cameras is scheduled for October 17. • Community Meeting on Homelessness is scheduled for October 18. PUBLIC WORKS Design • 228th UP Grade Separation - Extended Bid Opening to Oct. 23. • S 224th St Project Phase II - CORPS permit received Sept. 11. Moving forward to secure Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA). Met with King County Wastewater Oct. 2 to discuss design and permitting progress. • GRNRA South Pump Station – Hogan Park to James St Force Main - SEPA components shared with Pump Station project. Coordinating with utilities for potholes and began work on 30% design. • S 212th St Bridge Deck Resurfacing - Anticipate re-advertising this winter. • Underpass Lighting at James Street - Preparing contract plans to send to WSDOT for final review and approval. • Willis Street Roundabout – Willis and 4th Ave S - Met with Parks to discuss consultant selection criteria. Looking into Right-of-Way needs. Construction • LID 363: S 224th St Improvements – 84th Ave S to 88th Ave S (Ph 1): o 84th to SR 167 – Roadway excavation/grading on 224th St began on Oct. 9 from Central to the bottom of the ramp. Intermittent lane closures on 84th will be taking place as this work progresses. o SR 167 Bridge – Deck rebar placement is ongoing in Span 1 and 2. Span 3 deck form placement will conclude the week of Oct. 15 and rebar placement will begin. o SR 167 to 88th – Roadway excavation/grading will begin after completion of the above noted work on the west side of the project. Installation of precast concrete facia wall panels on the bridge approach began on Wed., Oct. 10. • East Valley Highway Pavement Preservation - The contractor has submitted a formal request to suspend the entire project until the Spring of 2019. • 2018 Asphalt Overlays - The contractor is working on curb ramp improvements in the Meridian Glen neighborhood; asphalt grinding, and paving activities are currently scheduled to proceed on Oct. 19. Grinding and paving on 103rd Pl SE will take place in conjunction with the work at Meridian Glen. ADA curb ramp and sidewalk replacements began in the Hycroft and Fox Creek communities last week. • Lake Meridian Estates Storm Drainage Improvements, Ph 2 - Storm pipe installation has been delayed due to conflicts with existing utilities that must be relocated. • Downey and Naden Clearing and Grading - Excavation and haul from Downey to Naden is underway. The Contractor is hauling approximately 3000 cubic yards per day. If the weather holds the contract could reach contract excavation/haul quantity late this week or early next week. Page 9 of 11 • 4th Ave. and Meeker St. Complete Street Project - The contractor is proceeding with work on the West side of 4th Ave. Thru traffic in all directions will be impacted daily until the completion of the contract work at the end of November. • Green River Shoreline Soil Preparation Project - City Council has authorized the award of this project to Olson Brothers Excavating and work will proceed on Mon., Oct. 29. • Marquee on Meeker – Utility installation is continuing on site with multiple crews and the site is being prepped for winter weather. The contractor has completed construction of the elevated concrete pedestrian crossing on Meeker. This new section of Meeker St. is scheduled to be opened to traffic on Thurs., Oct. 18. • Dick’s Drive-in –The new Dick’s Drive-in sign has been installed. The project team is expecting to open the restaurant on Dec. 1. • Morrill Meadows Park / East Hill Park Renovation and YMCA – On-site work continues with storm pipe installation and parking lot grading. Off-site work on 248th is scheduled to begin the last week in October. • Saratoga – Prepping for sidewalk in the right of way and grading for frontage improvements on 272nd St. The contractor has submitted plans for a full road closure to perform this work. • Arco – AM/PM – Final paving on 116th and 240th is scheduled to take place on Sat., Oct. 13. All directions of travel will be impacted during this paving. Environmental • Winter Flood Preparation - King County held their annual flood preparation meeting last Thurs., Oct. 4, and the Corps is held their annual flood preparation meeting Wed., Oct. 10. The city is holding its annual Flood Safety and Levee Patrol training on Tues., Oct. 16. • King County Flood Control District - The first meeting of the Lower Green River Corridor Plan Advisory Committee is scheduled for Fri., Oct. 12. We will be supporting Mayor Ralph in her role as the City’s representative on this committee. The 30-day scoping period for the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for this Corridor Plan is expected to begin around that date. • Lower Russell Road Levee - We are working with various groups of stakeholders on several critical paths, so this project can go to construction in 2019. We are working on property acquisitions and transfers between the city, the King County Flood Control District and a private property owner, the relocation of several private utilities, a historic barn, reviewing 100% designs and a long-term site management plan. We are also negotiating a draft ILA for construction management, ownership and maintenance on the project. The barn relocation is scheduled to be completed prior to the end of the year and bid documents are being prepared. • Signature Pointe Levee - On Fri., Oct. 5, we hosted the King County Flood Control District in a review of the Signature Pointe Levee Alternative Analysis. We are now proceeding with more detailed analysis of the alternatives that were narrowed down at the meeting. • Milwaukee II Levee - On Tues., Oct. 2, the Flood Control District Executive Committee gave approval to the City’s preferred alternative alignment. The city is proceeding ahead. • Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) 9 - On Mon., Oct. 1, we met with WRIA 9 staff to discuss potential future habitat projects in the Lower Green River Watershed. They are preparing a revised map with tentative habitat locations for the City Parks and Public Works groups to review. • Cross Connection Control (CCC) Program - City staff submitted an amending ordinance for the CCC Code to the State Department of Commerce for review. City staff will provide a presentation of this material to Public Works Committee in early November. Page 10 of 11 • Fall Recycling Event - The City’s final recycling event of 2018 will be held on Sat., Oct. 20 at Hogan Park. The participation at the two other events in 2018 has been great and we are expecting another good turnout to enable tons of materials to be reused or recycled. Land Survey and GIS • Working on the last of three Gateway site topography maps for Parks along West Valley Highway and a site topography for a proposed new Fuel Island at PW Operations. • Construction staking for 4th and Meeker and the Naden fill site. • Members of GIS team attended the King County GIS User Meeting in Seattle to participate in regional GIS discussions and advancement of the ArcGIS Pro software product. • Continuing work with ESRI Solutions Architect to enhance internal server architecture. • GIS has begun leading efforts to review and update the utility data models in order to conform to new asset management standards. Transportation • Transportation Master Plan, Non-Motorized: Staff are finalizing the potential bicycle projects map. The potential bicycle projects are the result of input from police, ECD, parks, public works, the Kent Bicycle Advisory Board, the Cultural Communities Board and neighborhood councils. Next, staff will apply feasibility criteria to assist in the development of the draft bicycle projects. Prioritization criteria is also being developed by staff to identify high/medium/low priority bicycle projects. • Future Metro RapidRide “I” Line: Staff met with King County Metro to discuss next steps for RapidRide I, connecting Auburn to Renton via Kent Station. Staff will be meeting biweekly for this project. • Future Metro Route 1514: Staff met with King County Metro to continue coordination to implement Route 1514 connecting Covington to SeaTac Airport and Burien via Kent Station. • Meeker Street: Completed a speed study on West Meeker Street to support the upcoming speed limit change from 40 mph to 30 mph between Kent-Des Moines Rd and the existing 30 mph zone west of Washington Ave. • Rotating Radar Speed Signs: Staff are investigating the feasibility of developing a program to rotate radar speed signs throughout the city. This would allow us to cover more of the city with a lower investment and also add a dynamic element, so signs do not become part of the background. We met with the Kent Police Department, signal crew, and sign crew to discuss the idea and determined it is feasible. Next steps will be selecting candidate locations and estimating costs. • Kent Station Electric Vehicle Charging Stations: We have a video camera recording the vehicle chargers. Signage will be installed by Oct. 23 notifying people that video surveillance is being used. Replacement vehicle charge station parts from vendor Charge Point that will ship on Oct. 10. Once we receive the parts we will arrange with the installation contractor (covered by our extended maintenance contract) to install new chargers after the signs have been installed. • School Zone Flashing Beacons: The southbound school zone flasher cabinet for Sunrise Elementary was vandalized again. This school zone flasher cabinet is connected to the photo enforcement equipment. Repairs were completed on Fri., Oct. 5 and the system is back up and running. Streets o Street maintenance crews are scheduled to sawcut the roadway along SE 276th St. just east of 132nd Ave. SE and grind the lifted asphalt areas on the drainage ditch trail that is just of south 236th St. Concrete crew have planned to repair the hand rails on Willis Page 11 of 11 Street between Railroad Ave. S and 1st Ave. S. Crews will also be removing the street trees on Central Ave. between W Gowe St. and W Titus St., as well as on W Gowe St. between Central Ave and Railroad Ave. S. Water • Water staff members are focusing on leak detection for the East Hill within the 590 Pressure Zone. Crews are also beginning their dead end main flushing in various neighborhoods throughout Kent. Water Source and Supply staff members will be focusing on cleaning and inspecting the 640 Reservoir. Utilities o Storm Crews plan to perform a manhole changeout on 212th St. at Riverview Blvd S and pumping and cleaning the Clark Springs Waste Tank. o Sewer crews have arranged to install a device that is used to prevent blockages called an X-Peller at the Skyline Pump Station. Crews will also be cleaning up and weed- eating at the decant site on 46th Ave S and Reiten Rd. # # # This page intentionally left blank. Agenda Item: Public Hearing – 6A_ TO: City Council DATE: October 16, 2018 SUBJECT: Second Public Hearing on the 2019-2020 Biennial Budget SUMMARY: This is the second public hearing on the 2019-2020 Biennial Budget at the regular City Council meeting. EXHIBITS: The 2019-2020 Mayor’s Proposed Budget is available at the City Clerk’s Office or online at https://www.kentwa.gov/government/budget-finance. RECOMMENDED BY: Finance Director MOTION: (No action required) This page intentionally left blank. Agenda Item: Public Hearing – 6B_ TO: City Council DATE: October 16, 2018 SUBJECT: Second Public Hearing on the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Plan SUMMARY: This is the second public hearing on the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Plan. EXHIBITS: The 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Plan is located within the 2019-2020 Mayor’s Proposed Budget and is available at the City Clerk’s Office or online at https://www.kentwa.gov/government/budget-finance. RECOMMENDED BY: Finance Director MOTION: (No action required) This page intentionally left blank. Agenda Item: Public Hearing – 6C_ TO: City Council DATE: October 16, 2018 SUBJECT: Public Hearing on the 2018 Property Tax Levy for the 2019 Budget SUMMARY: This is the public hearing on the 2018 Property Tax Levy for the 2019 Budget. EXHIBITS: The 2018 Property Tax Levy for the 2019 Budget is located within the 2019- 2020 Mayor’s Proposed Budget and is available at the City Clerk’s Office or online at https://www.kentwa.gov/government/budget-finance. RECOMMENDED BY: Finance Director MOTION: (No action required) This page intentionally left blank. Agenda Item: Public Hearing – 6D_ TO: City Council DATE: October 16, 2018 SUBJECT: Public Hearing on the Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Capital Facilities Element to Adopt School District Capital Facilities Plans SUMMARY: This is the public hearing on amending the Comprehensive Plan’s Capital Facilities Element to adopt the Capital Facilities Plans for the Highline, Auburn, Federal Way and Kent School Districts. The school impact fee adjustment ordinance is included for informational purposes only. EXHIBITS: Draft Ordinance to Amend the Comprehensive Plan Draft Ordinance to Adjust School Impact Fees (information only) MOTION: (No action required) This page intentionally left blank. 1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2018/19 – 2023/24 School Dist. Capital Facilities Plans ORDINANCE NO.________ AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the Kent Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities Element to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School Districts (CPA-2018-5). RECITALS A. The State of Washington Growth Management Act (GMA) requires internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements and the plans from other jurisdictions. B. To assure that comprehensive plans remain relevant and up to date, the GMA allows amendments to the capital facilities element of comprehensive plans concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a city budget. RCW 36.70A.130(2)(a)(iv). C. The City of Kent has established procedures for amending the Comprehensive Plan in Chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code (KCC), allowing amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the City budget and allowing the City Council to hold the public hearing instead of the Land Use and Planning Board. KCC 12.02.010. 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2018/19 – 2023/24 School Dist. Capital Facilities Plans D. The Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School Districts have submitted proposed amendments to their Capital Facilities Plans to be included in an amendment of the City’s Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. E. After providing appropriate public notice, the City Council of the City of Kent considered the requested Comprehensive Plan amendment and held a public hearing on the same on October 16, 2018. F. On September 18, 2018, the City provided the required 60 day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 to the State of Washington of the City’s proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The 60 day notice period has passed, and by operation of law, it is deemed approved. G. On November 20, 2018, the City Council of the City of Kent approved the Capital Facilities Element amendment CPA-2018-5 to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit “A” attached and incorporated by this reference. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE SECTION 1. - Amendment. The Kent Comprehensive Plan, and its Capital Facilities Element, are amended to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit “A” attached and incorporated by this reference (CPA- 2018-5). 3 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2018/19 – 2023/24 School Dist. Capital Facilities Plans SECTION 2. – Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering; or references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations. SECTION 3. – Severability. If any one or more section, subsection, or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, that decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. – Effective Date. This ordinance will take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law. DANA RALPH, MAYOR Date Approved ATTEST: KIMBERLEY A. KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted Date Published APPROVED AS TO FORM: PAT FITZPATRICK, CITY ATTORNEY 2018-2019 - 2023-2024 April 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 ) FEDERAL WAY, PUBLIC SCHOOLS Each Scholar: A voice. A dream. A BRIGHT future. CAPITAL FACI LITIES PLAN Thomas Jefferson High School Mirror Lake Elementary School Wildwood Elementary School Lake Grove Elementary School 20L9 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FÄCILITIES PLAN I.!l[ay 29,2018 BOARD OF EDUCATION Hiroshi Eto Carol Gregory Geoffery McAnalloy Mildred Ollée Claire Wilson SUPERINTENDENT Dr. TammyCampbell Prepared by: Sally D. Mclean, Chief Finance & Operations Officer Jennifer Wojciechowski, Student & Demo graphic Forecaster FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION SECTION I THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction Inventory of Educational Facilities Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities Needs Forecast - New Facilities Six Year Finance Plan SECTION 2 MAPS Introduction Map - Elementary Boundaries Map - Middle School Boundaries Map - High School Boundaries Map - City and County Jurisdictions SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction Building Capacities Portable Locations Student Forecast SECTION 4 I 2-3 4 5 6 7 8 9 15 16-1 8 19-20 2I-23 10 11 I2 13 t4 24 25-29 30-3 1 32-33 34 35 KING COLINTY, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, AND CITY OF KENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Introduction Capacity Summaries Impact Fee Calculations Reference to Impact Fee Calculations Student Generation Rates Impact Fee Changes from 2018 to 2019 1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODU CTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB) 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 2I, 1995 as amended, City of Kent Ordinance No.3260 effective March 7996, and the City of Aubum Ordinance No. 5078 effective 1998, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 2019 Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2018. This Plan is scheduled for adoption by King County, the City of Kent, City of Federal Way and the City of Aubum and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fcc ordinance. Tho City of Des Moines collects school impact fees as part of the SEPA process. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and aetively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing, jobs, services, culture, and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any juriscliction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies or management need. During the 2016-17 school year the District formed a 100 member Facilities Planning Committee consisting of parents, community members and staff. The Committee was tasked with developing a recommendation to the Superintendent regarding Phase 2 of the District's plan for school construction, remodeling, andlor modernization for voter consideration in November 2017. The voters passed this $450M bond authorization with a 620/o YES vote reflecting a commitment to invest in the modernization of our infrastructure. Through the committee's work a determination was made to rebuild Thomas Jefferson High School, Illahee Middle School, Totem Middle School, Lake Grove Elementary, Mirror Lake Elementary, Olympic View Elementary, Star Lake Elementary, and Wildwood Elementary. In addition to the school projects, the committee included a plan to modernize Memorial Stadium, which currently supports athletic activities for all schools. The rebuilding of the aforementioned schools will create additional capacity for sfudents at the elementary and high school levels. The expanded capacity supplants the need for additional elementary schools. 2 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION. continued As we are in the planning stages for the newly approved bond projects, we are entering the final phase of the $106 million project replacing Federal Way High School. The new facility will increased capacity by approximately 200 students and is expected to be completed by winter 2018. The costs of this additional capacity is excluded from the 2019 school impact fee calculations. The District continues to monitor factors that may have an impact on enrollment and capacity at our schools. In accordance with the McCleary decision, the State has provided funding to reduce K-3 class size to 17 and 4-12 class size to 25. Initiative Measure No. 1351 would fuither reduce these class sizes in schools where more than 50% of students were eligible for free and reduced-price meals in the prior year. Under this measure, class sizes in those schools would be reduced to 15 in grades K-3,22 in grade 4, and 23 in grades 5-12. The additional class size reductions required by Initiative 1351 would increase our classroom need from 60 to 120 at our Elementary & K-8 schools and add a need for an additional 26 classrooms at our Secondary schools. We will also continue to study school boundaries as new housing and fluctuating populations impact specific schools. Some shifts in boundaries may be required in the coming years. At this time with more than 1,000 unhoused elementary students, boundary adjustments cannot resolve the need for additional capacity. The maps included in this Plan reflect the boundaries for the 2018-19 school year. )J FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 1- THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. A Financial Plan that shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization listed follows this. 4 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 20I9 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (K-5I Adelaide Brigadoon Camelot Enterprise Green Gables Lake Dolloff Lake Grove Lakeland Mark Twain Meredith Hill Mirror Lake Nautilus (K-8) Olympic View Panther Lake Rainier View Sherwood Forest Silver Lake Star Lake Sunnycrest Twin Lakes Valhalla V/ildwood Woodrnont (K-8) MIDDLE SCHOOLS 16-8I Federal Way Public Acaderny (6-10) Illahee Kilo Lakota Sacajawea Sequoyah Totem TAF @ Saghalie (6-12) HIGH SCHOOLS (9-12) Decatur Federal Way Thomas Jefferson Todd Bearner Career Academy at Trurnan ADDITIONAL SCHOOLS Internet Acaderny (K- I 2) Employment Transition Prograrn ( I 2+) Federal Way Open Doors 1635 SV/ 304th St 3601 sw 336th Sr 4041 S 298th St 35101 5t" Ave SW 32607 47tt' Ave SW 4200 s 308tr'st 303 SW 30gth St 35827 32"d Ave S 2450 S Star Lake Rd 5830 S 300,h Sr 625 S 314t" Sr 1000 s 28gtr' sr 2626 SW 327thSt 34424 I'r Ave S 3015 S 368'h St 3460012tt' Ave SW 1310 sw 325tr'Pl 4014 S 270th St 24629 42d Ave S 4400 Sw 320th St 27847 42ú Ave S 2405 S 300th Sr 2645416t1' Ave S Federal Way Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Federal Way Aubum Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Kent Kent Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Des Moines 98023 98023 98001 98023 98023 98001 98023 98001 98003 98001 98003 98003 98023 98003 98003 98023 98023 98032 98032 98023 98001 98003 98198 98003 98003 9800 I 98023 98003 98001 98032 98023 34620 9rt' Ave S 36001 l't Ave S 4400 S 308th Sr 14l5 sw 3l4th st I l0l S Dash Point Rd 3450 S 360tr'ST 26630 40rt' Ave S 3391419tt' Ave SW 2800 sw 320th st 30611 l6tr'Ave S 4249 S 2ggtr' St 3599916tt' Ave S 31455 28t" Ave S 31455 28t" Ave S 33250 21't Ave SW 31455 28tr'Ave S Federal Way Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Federal Way Aubum Kent Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Federal V/ay Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way 98023 98003 98001 98003 98003 98003 98023 98003 5 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CURRENT INVENTORY NON.INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Developed Propertv Central Kitchen Federal Way Memorial Field Educational Services Center Support Services Center 1214 S 332"d 1300 s 308th st 33330 8th Ave S 1211 S 332nd St Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way 98003 98003 98003 98003 Leased Propertv Early Learning Center at Uptown 1066 S 320th St Square Federal Way 98003 Undeveloped Propertv Site # Location 75 SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW - 9.2 Acres 65 S 35lst Street &,52nd Avenue S - 8.8 Acres 60 E of 10th Avenue SW - SW 334th & SW 335th Streets - 10.04 Acres 73 N of SW 320th and east of 45th PL SW - 23.45 Acres 7l S 344th Street &.46th Avenue S - 17.47 Acres 82 l't Way S and S 342nd St - Minimal acreage 96 S 308th St and 14th Ave S - .36 Acres Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. 6 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2OI9 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST. EXISTING FACILITIES As parl of the multi-phase plan, the District intends to increase capacity for elementary and high school students with expansion at the Thomas Jefferson, Lake Grove, Mirror Lake, Olympic View, Star Lake, and Wildwood sites. Increased capacity at the five elementary schools listed and additional elementary schools in later phases, supplant the need for construction of a twenty-fourth elementary school. Only projects in Phase II with plans to increase capacity are included in the impact fee calculation for this plan. 1 PHASE EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS On- golng Purchase and Relocate Portables Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is Impact Fees. Thomas Jefferson High School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Voter Approved Capital bond II Illahee Middle School Replace Existing Buildine Voter Approved Capital bond T Totem Middle School Replace Existins Buildrne Voter Approved Capital bond II Lake Grove Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Voter Approved Capital bond II Mark Twain Elernentary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD, pending SCAP funding II Mirror Lake Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Voter Approved Capital bond Olynpic View K-8 School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Voter Approved Capital bond II Star Lake Elernentary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Voter Approved Capital bond II Wildwood Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Voter Approved Capital bond il Memorial Stadium Replace Existing Facility Voter Approved Capital bond III Decatur High School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Kilo Middle School Replace Existing Buildine TBD III Sacajawea Middle School Replace Existing Buildine TBD ilI Adelaide Elernentary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Brigadoon Elernentary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Camelot Elernentarv Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Lake Dolloff Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Nautilus K-8 School Replace Existing Building, lncrease Capacity TBD III Twin Lakes Elernentary Replace Existing Building, lncrease Capacity TBD III Woodrnont K-8 School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2CI19 CAPITAL FACILITIES PT,AN NEEDS FORECAST . ADDITIONAL F'ACILITIES PATED URCE OF FUNDSNEW F No current plans for additional facilities B FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 6-YEAR FINANCE PLAN Secured Fmding lss:o *1J' s8 550 89? 1? ¡51m5 stl-660-*t9 Sørcc haod Fs 11' Iãd Sd. Ëhd< t, B6dorl*rFeds f]ì Scùool Cømeim.,\ssisæ Proffi fSCAl{ f¿, TOTÂL Projected Revenue Achul and Plmned Expenditurcs I-OTES: L Tbæ.fBæqffit¡/bêiúglE{cbåKirgc@ty,Ci!.vofFêdåal$'4,.C4vof,{]¡hrqedCr}.ofKdirFeÌfÈffir-adsi¡be æihtÞ f6e by úÈDÈüêt åd Ðst@iûçx@. ThisislEðd bøbðëq t).3t11?. ?. Tbb b Je ed h€}úE 6 lL/i lr 7. 3. Thi¡ is t!¡ ll3lr17 bshê of bod fr¡¡s dd €pit¿l1ey ñE&. Thb &re tufr.þs iûffi ffii¡S9 1¡¿ kl'.€ æ ¡eU fú rhe @pþrie of F$T'S. J. Thbr.pleBúëbåbúæofS.ti,P*.hich*illb+r¡dtoroc@pl*eÌl¿r*ül¿i¡gofFêds¡lç.¿l,IliÉS{hol" Tlis þ úê b6læ ø 11,31/1?. 5. Tti3 È úttipsr¿d SC"{P f6 t¡È f¡@ projs dtøized by t¡È vom b }01?. 6. TtÈ ii a Hred K-j Clas sizerôr:tiø g!d. I t!Nov@¡620!t.ttÊÐisüidpß*dâ5a50Mbøéæ. Theætiacl¡d¿diatlcfreæpbûisfüprojdsl!ãrwi11@t.ldditiñálspacù. OltyúêGr3eidedFit!reiøgøFocit'æbha"d ia scùôol iEpsct f* dbE rtiß. Sæ pøg¿ m S. Tbae æ m pro¡øcd eleoi$ç*ß prop6m 9. Th* æ projded f6 bsêd ùpod atäp{tèd r$idetiel daetof@b i! t}e Disi¡r, SlJ,000 pü@r! ñ l¡Ê d 6 }w. t0. kojd bodCds b6êd e {:ffiæt *rids s of¡øl20lg. tl.N@CãtãqmpEch¿sdi¡:010totosúeÊdpt¡yffitTæitiúhott@ fteSl.l\lpü{ûæbásbÈ¿fGrcedl¡ro€La#e¡e,pre?dlocjtpco?r@t¡ro¡+hl0l0. 12, Thxe fæ ¡¿øËar t!¿ d of Ptrúsirs ðd i$E¡i!€ w p.{tzbhs- The pür¡bþ ryãdiæ à Ëtue }e3 øy ¡epf* qistiry pon¿öIEs tlât æ d Þdi@I.T¡seyrcri@cqËityedæ$¡itrlûd.dirtt øper!.slú@y. g TOT.{¡ sð9pú0939Bsuu¿ s:6rmml¡i- SgS-47O-lXI¡ll !:1 It:lTdl 20lg1lY!5 ll:, $ó.5m.0001Ì . $ãrmmll- $10,lm.0ool[i çtmmlll]l sfii-dmmltl---wmmltlìr SSIó(m&l0ll¡: :ì uilmll: i:! t¿r::: sol!:1,: solf..i ll::. : il' : 34?0 OtxltÌ: : ----------18= lf, i smmlÌ: 2@,{ 1ro1m< s¿3mm 12? {fB ffi s?m m î21 9{n fim 2ù23 2ùtL2/ lXmm s2ûû m wmm 1Ma AO2'':23 51-500.00{ t6ffim 52ûO ün stt-rmffi 2l¡1t 282rn sE2 {m û0ú Î1t ?mm sa00-000 s167,?ôo-msl37-a00-fi|0 20?o tmLlt \?¡ffim (qlmm ü1 gfiXXX) s40-00{¡(m 9??mm 9mm 2019 ?ot9-10 st! lmm 1ìmm s6rm(n s2ji.m{ $mm 3ùded 20t&tc s1 lmm ll ?mm s?]J.0ü sffim sl1935.û00 TIiIPOR{RYFACA,ÍIIIS PorBb¡es 112'ì FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2OI9 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 2. MAPS Federal Way Public Schools has twenty-one elementary schools (grades K-5), two schools with a K-8 grade configuration, six middle school schools (grades 6-8), four high schools (grades 9-12) andtwo small secondary schools. The Federal Way Public Academy serves students in grades 6-10. The programs at Career Academy at Truman High School serves students in grades 9-12. In addition to these programs, TAF@Saghalie serves students in grades 6-12 who reside within the service area. The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school, by school type. (Career Academy at Truman High School, Open Doors and Federal Way Public Academy serve students from throughout the District). The identified boundaries are reviewed annually. Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs that affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas. The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastruchrre is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School Districts are different. If the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. It is important to rcalize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single development. The final map included represents the city and county boundaries which overlap with the district's service areas. r City of Algona r City of Auburn r City of Des Moines . City of Federal Way . City of Kent . CityofMilton ¡ Unincorporated King County 10 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN MAP _ ELEMENTARY BOUNDARIBS k FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS I e,-c,ve¡.r¿ny sorooLs T ADCLAIDE !LEMENTARY 2 BRIGADOONTTTMTNTIIRY 3 CAMETOT ETEMENTI\RY ¡¡ TNÏERPRISË€I"ËMËNTÂRY 5 GREEN 6ABI€S ÊLEMENTÂRY 6 IAKÊ DOLTOFF EI-EMENTÁRY 7 TÂ(E GROVT II.IMENTARY I LilKtlltNDtttMlNTÂRYg MARK TWAIN IIIMTNTÂRV 10 MIRTDIT}I IIIIL TLTMTNTARY r1 MIRRORIAKEELEMINIARY l2 NAUT|IUS t(,8 SCl100t 1-3 OTYMPIC VIEW ETÊMENTARY 14 PANTHER I"AKE EI.ÊMENfARY 15 RAINIER VITW TTEMENTARY ¡6 SIIERWOOD FOREST ETTMENTARY 17 SII.VER tÂKÊ EI.ËMENTARY 18 SÏÁR TAKI ELEMENÍA.RY tg SUNNYCRESTTTTMENTARY 20 TWIN TAI(ES EI.EMËNIARY 21 V Lll^LLA tLErvlCNT^RY 22 WIDWOOD ELEMTN]ARY 23 WOODMONTK-8SCIOOL I nrrps pRopERw ELEMENTARY BOUNDARIES - MDDIE scHooLs 3Ti FWPUBUCACADEIVIY 30 ILIAHÊE MIOÞLE SCHOOL 31 K|LO MrDDtf SCHOOL 32 IAKOTA MIDDIE SCHOOI 33 SACAJAWEA MIDDTE sCH(X)I 37 SEQUOYAHMTODITSCHOOL 35 TOTEMMIDDTESCHOOL 38 ÍAr @sAcHALrE : , HIGH SCHOOL5¡tO DECÂTUR HIGH 4L FtDtRÂt" W^Y ü6il 421 TilOM^SJEFTERSONiltGil 45 TODD 8€AMER HIGH 490 CARETRACÄIJEMY úùTRUMAN 5l ITP/NORMAN CIMTIR I eoN¡¡¡¡srn¡r¡vE srrEs :t¡:¡,lr. I 11 N v m.16.3 0.6 0.9 1.2E-rÞl¡les Þate:7.1.17 FEDER\L WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN MAP _ MIDDLE SCHOOL BOUNDARIBS fir FEDERAL WAY PUBLTC SCHOOLS I u.etrururonv scuools r ADELAIDE ELEMENTARY 2 BRIGADOON ELTMINTARY 3 CJ\METOT ÉIEMENT/\RY 4 ËNTERPRISEETfMTNIARY 5 6RÉEN GAEIES ETEMENTARY 6 IÁKT DOTIOFT EIIMENIARY 7 I-AKT GROVE TTEMENIARY 8 TAI(IIÂND ETEMENTARY 9 MARKTWAIN ËIEMCNTARY 1O MERÊDIIH HIIt ËI€MENTÂRY I1 MIRROR LAKT ETEMINTARY 12 NAUTil.U5 K€ SCHOOI 1.3 OLYMPIC VIËW EI[MENTARY 14 PANTHER TAI(€ ÊLÊMÊNÌAf,Y 15 ßAINIER VIEW [IIMINTABY 16 SIIERWOOD FORESTETIMENTARY 17 SITVER IAI(E EITM€NTARV r8 STAÊ IAI(E ÊtEMÊNTÂRY 19 SUNNYCRESÍ ELEMENTARY 20 TWIN LAKES EI.EMENTARY 21 VATHAI"TAELEMENTARV 22 Wil"DWOO0 ÊtÊMËNTARY 23 WOODMONT("8SCHOOt MtÞÞl"E scHooLs rW PUBUCACADETúY ITI¡HEE MIDDTE SCHOOt Klto MtDDt_É scHoot tAKOÍA NIDDU SCHOOT SACAJAW€A MIDDI-E SCHOOL gEQUOYAH MIDDIE SCHOOT TOIEM MIODLE SCHOOI TÀF €' SAGHATIE Ht6il SCilOOIS OECÂTUR HIGH F[DCn^r W Y iltGil TIIOMAS JEFFERSON IIIGII TODD EEAMER }IIGTI CARTER ACAOEMY @ TRUMAN ETP/NORMAN CËNTER ! nor"illttsrnmvc sITES . 36 30 31 33 l7 35 38 wÊß {1 421 45 490 51 I rwps PRoPERTY MIDDLE SCHOOL BOUNDARIES & 1i, æ.10.3 0.5 0.9 r.2r-tlMlles Dåtê:7-1-17 I2 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2OI9 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN MAP - HIGH SCHOOL BOUNDARIES fï FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ! eteurrurnnvsclrooLs 1 AÞEI-AIDÊ ELEM€NTARY 2 BRIGADOONEI.EMENTARY 3 CÀMEIÕT ELÊMÊNÎARY 4 EÑTERPRISEIIEMENTÂRY S Gf,EEN GAÊTËS ÉI.EMÊNTAßY 6 TAKE DOII.OFF EIEMENTÂRY 7 LAI(E GROVE EIËMTNTARY 8 IAKEIAND ELEMENTARY S MARß ÍWAIN ÊTEMENTARV 10 MIRIOIÏII IIITI ETEMENTARY 1T MIRROR !AI(É ËIEMENÍARV 12 NAUTTIUS K.8 SCilOOt 13 OIYMPIC VIEW EI.EMCNIARY 14 PANTHER LAKE ETEMENTARY 15 RAINIÊR VIEW ÊIEMENIARY 16 9HÊRWOOD FORESTEIÊMENÍARY 17 SILVER TÂKE ELEMTNTARY 18 SIAR IA(Ë ÊTEMÊNTÂRY 19 SUNNYCR€SÍ ETEMENTARY 2O TWIN IAKËS ÊTEMENIARY ?1 VATTIAII.AEI.EMSNTARY 22 WIIDWOôD EIEMËNTÂRV 23 WOODMONTX-sSCHOOL - MrDÞl€sclrools36 FWPUBUCACADEIVTÍ 30 ILIAHEE MIDPLE SCHOOT 31 Kt[O MtDOt¡ SCHOOL 32 TAKOTA MIDDIE SCHOOL 33 SACAJAWEA MIDOTE SCHOÓI 37 SEQUOYAH MIDOI.E SCHOOL 35 TOTEMMIDÞLESCHOOL 38 TAF €} SAG¡IALIE HtGH SCHOOTS OEC/\TUR HIGH FED[RAL Wl\Y }IIGlI THOM/15 JEFFERSON HIGH TODÞ BEÂMIR IIIGII CÁFEER ACADEMY @ TRUMAN ETP/NORMAN CENTER I nomrNrsrnmve srïEs * 40 4t 421 45 490 51 I rwpsPRoPERry HIGH SCHOOL BOUNDARIES #æ.ts.3 0.6 0.9 1.2EMIIQS Dätè:9.2.16 \i, 13 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN FEE}ERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Ê.¡.h s{hÉlsr: A ,/úl(Ê. A dffãdi. ^ lnI€HT future. Ðes Algona Aul¡um ûes lrloiries Federal Way | | xent I onn Milton t Auburn King Algona Xent Federal Way I ¡ û ,-J I .)j'-(i0i! Õû I r' -.i {i aôa t*''r' ó t. ll 'r.t ''ô ta' Õ a ,,1 {r,i t*rt t' Õ t, f,lilton City and County Jurisdictions? lTdtesgÐ.5 I I I MAP _ CITY AND COUNTY JURISDICTIONS I4 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities - The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast - 2019 through 2025 15 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING CAPACITIES This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of seryice" in order to ascertain the District's cument and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. In general, the District's current target class size provides that the average class size for a standard classroom for grades K through 3 should be 17 students to comply with current legislation, however compliance is currently suspended so we are using current average class sizes. ln grades 4-5 the target is 25 students. For grades 6 to 12 the target class size is 26 students. Classrooms for students with Individualized Education Program (Special Education) needs are calculated aT 12 seats per classroom. Historically, the District has used the OSPI square footage calculation as a baseline for capacity calculation and made adjustments for specific program needs. The District will continue to use this calculation for determining capacity at our middle and high schools. However, with the implementation of smaller K-3 class sizes which requires a significant reduction in K-3 class sizes, elementary capacity, in this Plan, will be calculated based on the number of classroom spaces, the number of students assigned to each classroom and the extent of support facilities available for students, staff, parents, and the community. Class Size Guidelines FWPS Historical "Standard of Service" H82661/SH82776 Enacted Law Square Footage Guideline Kindergarten 18.9 t7 25-28 Grades 1-2 18.9 t7 25-28 Grade 3 18.9 l7 28 Grades 4-5 25 25 28 For the pulposes of determining student capacity at individual schools, the following list clarifies adjustments to classroom spaces and the OSPI calculation. Special Education Resource Rooms: Each middle school requires the use of a standard classroom(s) for special education students requiring instruction to address specific clisabilities. English as a Second Language Programs: Each middle school and high school requires the use of a standard classroom for students leaming English as a second language. Middle School Computer Labs: Each middle school has computer labs, except Totem Middle School. Wireless access has been installed at all secondary schools. Ifadditional classroom space is needed, these computer labs may be converted to mobile carts. 76 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 20I9 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING CAPACITIES, continued High School Career Development and Learning Center (Resource) Room: Each high school provides special education resource room and carcer development classrooms for students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. PreschoolÆCEAP/Headstart: Our district currently offers preschool programs for both special needs & typically developing students at l0 elementary schools. We also have ECEAP and Headstart program at 10 sites (4 elementary, 1 middle, 3 high schools, and 2 off-site locations). These programs decrease capacity at those schools. The District has recently opened a leased space and relocated several programs to this location and to the recently vacated TAFA portables. This has also allowed us to expand the number of ECEAP programs offered. Alternative Learning Experience: Federal Way offers students the opportunity to participate in an Alternative Learning Experience through our Internet Academy. These students have never been included in the capacity calculation of unhoused students. I1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ELEMINTARY BUÍLDING PROGRAIVI CAPACITY BUILDING CAPACITIES, continued MIDDLESCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAMCAPACITY HICHSC}IOOL BTJILDING PROGRAMCAPACITY Notes * Federal Way Public Acaderny, Career Acadenry at Trulran High School, and Ernployrrent Transition Progrzrn andTAF@Saghaliefbrthehighschool schoolgradespan(9-12)arenon-boundaryschools. Theseschoolsarenotusedinthe calculated avelages. School Name Headcount Adelaide 3s3 Brioadoon 299 Carnelot 271 Entemrise 34s G'een C¿bles 401 Lake Dolloff 400 [¿ke Crove 353 t¿keland 171 Mar* Twain 430 Meredith Hill 37s Min¡r l¡ke Nautilus (K-8) 262 466 Olvmnic Mew 353 Panther L¿ke 347 Rainier View 405 Sheruood Forest 390 Silver t¿ke 400 Star t¿ke 337 Srrnnvcrcst 405 Twin Lakes 34t Valhalla 406 Wildwood 372 Woodlnont (K-8)357 TOTAL 8.445 School Nalre Headcount FTE tllahee 855 864 Kilo 779 781 l¿kota 786 794 Sacaiawea 694 701 Seo uoyah 585 591 Totern 795 803 TAF @ Sachalie 598 604 Fedeml Wav Public Acadelnv r83 185 TOTAI,5.275 5329 * Mirklle School Awraqe 727 735 School Narne Headcount FTE Decatur 1243 lJ29 Federal Way r 684 1.801 Thor¡as Jellemon t224 t 309 Todd Beamer r 085 l.l 60 TAF â Saphalie 155 l6ó Career Acade¡nv at Tnlrmn ls9 170 Federal Wav Public Acadernv l16 124 Elnployrrent Trans ition Pro grarn 48 5l TOTAL 5-714 6.rIt [lementûrv A\€rage 367 I*High School Alerage 1B FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not an efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of spac e for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as interim measures to house students when increasing population impacts a school attendance area. Portables may also be required to house students when new or changing programs require additional capacity. They also provide housing for students until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. I9 FEDERAL WAY PLTBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS' Continued PORTABLES LOCATED AT F,I-ENTE\TARY S CHOO LS PORTABLES LOCATED ,A,T NiIIDDLESCHOOLS PORTABLES LOCATU) AT HICHSCHOOLS INSTRUCTIONAL NON INSTRUCTIONAL Decatur I I Federal Wav Thornas Jefferson l0 Todd Bearner I 't'(-)'t'AL 26 I PORTABLES LOCATÐ AT SUPPORT FACILITIES MOT TDC 9 Fonner TAFA ll TOTAL 20 DISTRICT PORTABLES IN USE FOR ECEAP AND/OR TART ¡NSTRUCTIONAL NON INSIRUCfIONAL Adelaide I , Brisadoon I Cauælot I Entemrise 3 Geen Gables I¿ke Dolloff 2 l¿ke C¡rove 2 [¿keland MalkTwain 3 Meredith Hill 3 Minor l¿ke l0 t Nautilus Olvrnpic View 2 Panther [¿ke 4 RainielMew 5 Sherwood Forest 4 Silver l¿ke 4 Star L¿ke 3 I Sunnycrest 6 Twin l¿kes -t Valhalla 4 Wildwood 4 Woodrnont 3 TOT,A.L 67 l2 Sherwood Forest , Totern , Total 4 INSIRUCfIONAL NON INSTRUCTIONAL IIIahee ,l Kilo I 6 t¿kota Sacaiawea 5 Seouovah t Totern 4 TAF@ Sashalie 4 TOTAL l8 7 20 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 20I9 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN STUDENT FORECAST Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed arurually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students. The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not trace individual students; it is concemed with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out ofthe school system are commoq student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted. A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level. The En¡ollment MasterrM software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment. In February 2018, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District. The report was complete in March 2018. The model used to forecast next year's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county-wide average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections. The long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes in the 5-19 age group for King County. Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of 2I FEDERAL WAY PT.IRT,TC SCHOOT.S 20I9 CAPTTAT. FACTT,ITTES PT,AN STUDENT FOR-ECAST' continued something else (e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend fbr the school-age population over time. The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2025. This model produces a projection that is between 21,500 and 25,000 when applied to the low, medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models. Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional clemographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington. Near term projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by current local economic conditions. The District tracks new development from five permitting jurisdictions. Long range planning assumes a student yield from proposed new housing consistent with historical growth patterns. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school district community in the future. aa FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2OI9 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN STUDENT FORECAST, continued Headcount Enrollment History and Projections (Excludes Full-Time Running Start) S chool Ye¿r Ele M¡ddlêCalendâr Yr 2013 2014 201 5 20t6 2017 201 8 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2012-13 2013-14 2014-1 5 2015-16 2016-t7 2017-18 820 I 8-t I P20t9-20 n020-2t P202t-22 P2022-23 P2023-24 P2024-25 Totà¡ K-12 HC 21.562 2 1.808 2l .7 54 2l .995 2l .933 21.915 2l,9 t 7 22,t 85 22,243 22,347 22,489 22,713 22,967 Percenl I.I% 9.731 5.014 6.817 I 0.1 42 4.84s ó.82 I 9.998 4.93 I 6.825 10.20ó 5.094 6.695 10.424 5,031 6.476 10.418 5.159 6.338 10,292 5,247 6,378 r0,29t 5,470 6,424 10,288 5,462 6,493 10,336 5,357 6,654 10,441 5,259 6,786 r0,s93 s,2s3 6,867 10,796 5,28s 6,886 Elenenttry K-5 MitldleSchool 6-8 High School 9-12 I,I% -0.3% -0.r% 0.0% 1.2% 0.3% 0.5% 0.6% L0% 1. I 0/6 24,000 23,000 22,000 21,000 20,000 19,000 18,000 17,000 16,000 15,000 Enrollment Hisiory and Six Year Forecast È"\ù,.Ènù,.ù,^qqqqqq)o 2o Þr 2, ), 2e 9" g ou, 'i *B 'g School Year ¡LlC 23 FEDERAL WAY PLTBLIC SCHOOLS 20I9 CAPITAL FACII,TTIF.S PT,AN SECTION 4 - KING COUNTY. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY. AND CITY OF KENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Capacity Summaries Site & Construction Costs Allocations Student Generation Rates Impact Fee Calculations Reference to Impact Fee Calculations 24 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2OI9 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARIES All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information, Portable Capacity information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The District has recently adjusted its capacity calculation method for Elementary schools to better show capacity needed to comply with the K-3 Class Size Reduction. This adjustment is also shown in the portable capacity calculation. In order to allow for flexibility in portable usage the District will use an average class size calculation of 2l for each Elementary portable and an average class size of 25 for each Middle and High School portable. The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, middle school, and high school levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year. 25 FEDERAL WAY PI_IBLIC SCHOOLS 20Iq CAPITAT FACIT,TTTF.S PI.AN CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued Capacity Summary - All Grades CAPACITY m.{ROLLMm{T Budset -- Proiected-- Calendar Year 20t8 20t9 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 School Year 20t8-19 2019-20 2020-21 202t-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 BUILDINC PROCRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY FTECAPACITY t9,434 19.885 19,434 I 9.88s 19,434 r9,885 19,434 I 9.885 20,005 20,456 20,455 20,922 20,455 )o q)) Add Capacity Adiusted Prosrarn Headcount Capacitv 1,9.434 t9.434 19.434 20.005 20.4ss 20.455 20,455 Adiusted Prosrarn FTE Capacitv 19.885 19.885 19.885 20.456 20.906 20.922 2Q,922 Bas ic Headcount Enlolllnent lntemet Acaderny Headcount Enrolhnentl Basic FTE Enrolhnent without Intemet Academv 2t,9t7 (208) 2t.709 22,185 (208) 21,977 )) )A'l (208) 22.035 22,347 (208) 22.r39 22,489 (208) 22,28t )) 1 l'\ (208) 22.s0s 22,967 (208) 22.759 S URPLUS OR (TJI\HOUS FD) ACTTY RELOCÄTABLECAPACITY SURPLUS OR(LINHOUSFD) PROGRAM AND RELOCATAB LE CAPACITY 473 205 r23l)236 544 336 82 NOTES: I Intemet Acaderny students are included in projections but do not require full titne use olscliool fàcilities Curent Portable Capacity Add New Porlable Capacity Subtract Portable Capacity 2,t7 t ') )q'l ) )q7 t,919 t,919 t,9 t9 1,9 t9 Adiusted Portable Caoacilv ) )o1 ) )Q'7 1,9 t9 t,9t9 1.919 1.919 1"919 26 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued Capacity Summary - Elementary Schools Budget -- Proiected-- Calendar Year 20r 8 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 School Year 2018-r9 2019-20 2020-21 2071-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 BUILDING PROGRAM HEAD COUNT CAPACITY F-IECAPACITY 8A4s 8.445 8.445 8.44s 8,445 8.445 8.44s 8.44s 9,0r6 s.0 r6 o tro o rro o )to q )?o Add/Subtract capacity total Aclcl capacity atl L¿ke Crove Mirror l¡ke Stal L¿ke Wildwood Adiusted Prograrn Fleadcount Capacitv 8.44s 8.M5 8.445 9.016 9.229 9.229 9.229 Adiusted Pto grarn FTE Capacitv 8.445 8.445 8.445 9.016 9,229 q ))a q ??o ENROLLMüll'[ Bas io Fleaclcount Enrolhrpnt Internet Acaderny Heaclcount" Basic Fleadcount Enrollrrcnt without Intelnet Acaderw 10.277 t0,292 (ls) 10,291 ( l5) t0.276 10,288 (15) t0.273 10,336 (15) 10.32 l 10,444 ( l5) 10.49 10,593 ( ls) 10.s78 10,796 ( l5) 10.78 I SURPLUS OR(UNHOUS[I)) PROGRANICAPACITY 11.832)ú.8311 ll -828ì û.30s)ú.200)(1"349)tr.s52ì RTLOCATABLECAPAC|TY1 s LJRPLUS OR (LrN HOUS !D) PROGR-A,M AND RE-OC¡\TABLE CAPACITY (635)(634\ú.009)t486)l38l )t530)(733\ NOTES: I Capacity increases are pt'ojected based on a design to accornmdate 600 stuclents - as design is corr4rletecl these uny be adjusted in firttne itetations olthis plan. lncreased capacity ìs currently stated as the dillerence between cunent calculated capacity and the projeoted design. 2lnternetAcadenrystudentsareincludedinprojectionsbutdonotrequirefulltirneuseofschoolfacilities. 3 Relocatable C'apacity is basecl on the nurrtrel of portables available and othel adrninistrative techniques which can be used to teuporarily house students until perrrunent fàcilities are available. This is a calculated nurnberonly The actual nutrùer ofporlables that will be usecl will be based on actual student population needs. The District rmy begin to pull portables fì'otnthe instructional inventory. Age and condition of the porlables will detennine fèasibility ttrl continued instructional use. Cunent Portable Capacity Acld/Subtract porlable capacity Add portable capacity at: Lake Dolloff Meredith Ftill Sunnyclest Subtract portable capacity at: L¡ke Gove Minor L¡ke Star L¿ke Wildwood 1,071 t.t97 1.191 819 819 819 8t9 Adíusted Potable Caoacitv r.t97 1.197 8t9 819 8t9 819 819 21 FEDERAL WAY PLTBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PI,AN CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued Capacity Summary - Middle Schools ITY 8.{ROLLùI${T Budset -- Proiected-- Calendar Year 20r 8 201 9 2020 202r 2022 2023 2024 School Year 201 8- t9 20t9-20 2020-2t 202t-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 BUILDING PROCRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY FTECAPACITY < t?< s.329 5,275 s329 5 ?75 5.329 < )1\ 5329 < t7s 5 1r0 \ )75 5.129 5,275 5.329 Add/Subtract capacity Add capacity at: Totetnl Adiusted Prosraln Headcount Capacitv s )'1\5.275 5 t75 \ )1\s t75 5.275 5.215 Adiusted Prosrarn FTE Capacity 5.329 5.329 5.329 s.329 s.329 5.329 5.329 Bas ic Headco unt Enrolln--nt Intemet Acatleury2 Basic Enrolhnent without lntemet Acadernv 5,247 (47) 5,200 5,470 (41) 5.423 5,462 (47) 5,415 5.357 (47) s,310 5.259 (47) s,212 s )51 5.206 (47) 5,285 (4'7) s.238 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAMCAPACITY t29 o4\186)L9 ll7 t23 9t RELOCATABLECAPACITYT Cunent Porlable Capacity Acldi Subtract portable capacity Totern Middle School Adiusted Portable Caoacitv 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 (100) 3s0 350 350 3s0 3s0 SURPLUS OR(LINHOUSF¡) PROGRAIVI AND Rfl-OCATABLE CAPACITY s79 356 364 469 461 413 441 NOTES: I ToternMiddteschoolcumentlyhasacapacitytbr'800studentsandisbeingdesignecltoaccomrrodateacornparable student population. 2 lnternet Acaclerny students are includecl in projections but do not require ñrll titne use of school facititics. 3 RelocatableCapacityisbasedonthenur¡berofportablesavailableandotheradrninistrativetechniqueswhich can be used to ternporadly house students until pennanent lacilities are available. This is a calculated nutnber only. The actual nurnber ofpofiables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The Distrjct uray begin to pull portables liomtlie instnrctional inventory. Age and condition of the portables wìll detennine fbas ibility for continued ins tructio nal us e. 2B FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2OI9 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY S UMMARIES' Continued Capacity Summary - High Schools CAPACITY n{ROLLMm{T Budeet - - Prolected - Calendar Year 20 t8 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 School Year 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY FTE CAPACITY 5,714 6.r I I 5,714 6.1 il 5,114 ó.1I I 5,7 t4 6.llt 5,714 6.1 il 5,951 6-164 5,951 63& Add/Subtract capacity Tlrornas Jeffenon High Schoola Adius ted Progmrn Headcount Capacitv 5.7 14 5.-/14 5.7t4 5;il4 5,951 5,95 I 5,951 Adiusted Prograln FTE Capacity ó.llt 6"il1 6.n l 6.1ll 6.3&6,364 639 Basic Headcount Enrolhnent lntemet Academyl Basic Ed without Intemet Acadernv 6,378 (t46) 6.232 6,424 (146) 6.278 6,493 (146) 6,347 6,654 (146) 6,508 6,786 (146) 6,U0 6,867 (t46) 6,72t 6,886 ( 146) 6"740 s URPLUS OR (TJNHOUS ED) PROGRAMCAPACITY (121\$67\Q36\ß97\Q76\1357)ß761 RELOCATABLECAPACNY2 Curent Porlable Capacity Add/Subtract porable capacity 650 650 650 650 650 650 650 Adjusted Ponable Capacity 650 650 650 650 650 650 650 S URPLUS OR (I.JNHO US [D) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPAClTY3 529 483 4t4 253 374 293 274 NOTES: l. InternetAcadetnystudentsareincludedinprojectionsbutdonotrequirefull tirneuseofschool fàcilities 2 RelocatableCapacityisbasedonthenumberofportablesavailableanclothetadrninistrativeteclrniqueswhich can be used to telnporarily house students until pennanent lacilities are available. This is a calculated number only The actual nurnberolportables that will be used will be based on actual student popr.rlation needs. The District rnay begin to pull porlables fiorn the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the porlables will detennine fèasibility fbr continued ins tructional us e. 3. Capacity lol unhoused students will be accorrurpdated with traveling teachers and no planning tirne in sorne classroolm. 4 CurrentprojecttirnelinesestiratethecornpletionofThornasJetlèrsonHSopeninginthelall of2022. 29 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FBE CALCULATIONS Single and Multi-Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County Code 214 and was substantially adopted by the City of Aubum, Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that district. Impact Fee Calculation On page 30, the 2018 variables for the calculation of the Impact Fee for single family and multi-family units based on King County Code 2lA and the Growth Management Act, generate the results below: Plan Year 20I B Plan Year 2019 Single Family Units Multi-Family Units Mixed-Use Residential I s6,842 820,086 810,043 s7,221 $19,454 727 Impact Fee Calculation - King County Code 214 The Impact Fees have changed as a result of changes in several factors. The updates made to the variables in the Impact Fee calculation, generate a change in the Impact Fee between the 2018 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2019 Capital Facilities Plan. A summary of these changes can be found on page 32 and a year over year comparison of formula variables can be found on page 33. I In accordance with the City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 30 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS' continued Impact Fee Calculations School Site Acquisition Cost: Faciliry Cost / Acre Facilitv Student Factor Student Factor' SFR Student FactoÍ Cost/ MFR Cost/ MFR Cost/ MFR Cost/ MFR MFR Cost/ SFR Cost/ SFR Elernentary Middle School High School School Construction Cost: o/o Penn Fac.i Facility Facility TOTAI, Student Factor MFRTotalFt Eler.nentary Middle School High School Temporary Facility Cost: o/o Terrp Fac.Facility Facility Total Ft Cost Elernentary Middle School High School State Matching Credt Calculation: Construction Cost Sq. Ft State A Ft Student Elernentary Middle School High School Tax Payment Credit Calculation Average Assessed Value (March 2018) Capital Bond Interest Rate (March 2018) Net Present Value of Average Dwelling Yeats Atprlized Prcpefty Taxlevy Rate Present Value of Rere¡rue Stream Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost Penrnnent Facility Cost Terrpomry Facility Cost State Match Credit Tax Payurent Credit SubTotal 507n Local Share lln accordance with the City of Federal Way Or'dinance No. 95-249 2ln accor'dance with the City of Kent Ordinance No.4278 Total SFR Single Family Multi-Family MixeGUse Residences Residences Residentiall Student Factor FR TOTAI, Student Factor Cost/ Cost/ SFR SFR TOTAL Student Factor Studsnt Factor MFR $ $ $ $ $ 2,862 $ 20,408 $ 2t$ (5,633) $ (3.214) S 5,781 $ 47,388 $ 5s$ (13,145) $ (l,l7l) $ 5,781 47,388 55 ( r3,145) (l,l7l) $ t 4,443 $ $ 7,221 $ 38,908 $ 19,454 $ 38,908 t9.454 Calculated lmBct Fee $ 7.221 S t9.454 S 9.727 City of Kent tmpact Fee2 s 7.22r $ 8.386 $0 $0.9,??y 0.1073 SO s00.2701 4.85 $216.718 5l 0.13m 0.2808 $2.8ó2 $5.78 r s2.862 $s,781 927.134 $0 784$3S,701,150 I l $r7.óó1.7r3 I 0.1073 0.270t $ $0 $920.2s4 $20,408 $47.388 $s5 $0 3.2t% t88 0.1073 0.1390 t26 0.2244 0.5865 $21 0.2701 0.2808 $0 $21 |tt55 s2.973 s7.771 s0 $0 s225.97 ,..._...-_.-ï??1,?L $225.97 65. I 65.15%0.1 0.5865 .$2.6({l $5.374 $5.633 sl -1.1 45 ...$i?7,.q91.... 3.8s% ...$J.t?t?.1... 3.8s% ..v,q1,q,7!1..__ l0 $ r.20 __.$97.i,?_qÞ.._. l0 $ 1.20 $3,214 $ 1.171 31 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2OI9 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN REFBRENCES TO IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS SCHOOL ACQUISITION COST The district purchased the Norman Center to house the Employment Transition Program and to allow for the expansion of the ECEAP program. The purchase and use of this site increased our high school permanent capacity by 51 students. Total Cost Cost per Acre $2,100,000 / 2: $1,0500000 81,050,000 / 4.85 : 821 6,718 SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COST With voter approval of the $450,000,000 bond package, design work is underway for six of the approved projects. Anticipated construction budgets (based on the Maximum Allowable Construction Cost or MACC) have been updated to reflect the current construction market, and capacity has been line-tuned. In addition, a credit for the cost of new construction is incorporated to recognize the K-3 Class Size Reduction Grant obtained by Federal Way Public Schools. It is estimated this $23 million grant will be reimbursed in six equal payments - a portion for each of the six schools serving K-3 students. The following table outlines the facility cost included in the impact fee calculation: Two additional projects are within this horizon, but not yet included - Olympic View K-8 and Mark Twain Elementary. These costs will be incorporated into future Capital Facilities Plans. Current Middle School capacity calculations do not reflect unhoused students, so no costs associated with lllahee Middle School or Totem Middle School are included. Consistent with the capacity calculations described earlier, the District uses the OSPI square footage calculation for determining capacity at our secondary schools. Based on this methodology, the following construction costs for Thomas Jefferson High School are allocated as the proportionate share: Elementary Schools Lake Grove Mirror Lake Star Lake Wildwood Elementary TOTAL Permanent Capacity 353 404 387 472 t6t6 New Capacity 600 600 600 600 2400 Increased Capacity as o/o 48.5o/o MACC 827,r74,2s0 s27,174,250 s29,854,450 s27.174.250 $ 1 1 1,377,200 Proportionate Share $ 54,034,483 K-3 Class Size Credit ($ 15,333,333) Net Proportionate Share $ 38,701,150 32 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 20I9 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN REFERENCES TO IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS, continued Square Footage Capacity at 130 sq. ft. Current: l79,ll9 1378 Planned: 210,000 l6 15 Increased Capacity 237 Increase as o/o 17.24% MACC $102.443.200 Proportionate Share $ 17.661.713 The District will use the above formulas created as a base for future Capital Facilities Plans during the life of the current bond authorization. The capacity of these schools may vary from year to year as programs are added or changed and construction cost may increase over time. FACILITIES CAPACITY Permanent Facility Capacity: Changes to the Building Program Capacities calculation are found on page 17. Capacity Summaries: The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 25-28. Student Generation Factor Analysis: Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single-family units and multi-family units. The factors used in the 2019 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single-family units and multi-family units that were constructed in the District in the last five (5) years and can be found on the next page Temporary Facility Cost: The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on pages 18 and t9. 33 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN STUDENT GENERATION RATES New Construction in Prior 5 Years Single Fanib' Student Generation Multi-Fauriþ' Student Generation - Cit¡' of Federal Wa¡' Total SüJClent Factor 0 2ô67 0.3334 0 8667 0.2381 0.63ö3 û.40{n 0.4138 0 6755 o.3243 0 5910 o-4707 lligh School Student Facbr 0 000û 0 2000 0.008/ 0.0667 0.tlsog û.166/ 0 1034 0 2281 0.1081 0 159't 0.1390 Middle School Student Factor û 0667 0 0667 0. r 333 0 0190 0.0909 0 1333 0 m90 0.1 842 0 1081 0.13ô4 0,1073 Elementary Sù¡dent Factor 0 2000 0.0667 0 6667 o 1524 o 4545 0.1000 o 2414 o.2632 0 1081 0 2955 o-''244 Number of High School Sü¡denb 0 3 1 7 1 5 3 26 4 7 57 Number of lliddle School St¡dents 1 1 2 1 4 2 21 4 ô 44 Number of Elementary St¡de nts 3 10 16 3 7 30 4 13 92 Number of S¡ngle Family Dwellings 1a 13 15 105 tt 30 29 114 37 44 41Ð DEVELOPMENT (1 7) Eagle Manor (17) Lakehaven Estates (1 7) Hrbbford Glen (17) Vista Pointe {16) Jefierson Placê (1 6) Star Lake East (1 5) Swan Song (1 5) Wynstone East (14) North Lake Rim {14) Wynstone Total Sù¡dent Generation" Total Strdent Factor 0 8669 1 .3194 0.2963 "t 3tìã2 1-1374 High School Student Facbr 0 1851 o.2ft8 0.0741 o 4427 0,2808 ll¡ddle School Student Fâctor 0 2110 0.2778 0 0741 o 3447 o.2701 Elementary Sû¡dent Facbr 0 4708 0.7639 0 1481 0 6177 0.5865 I'lum be r of High Sehool St¡de nts 57 60 2 118 23t Num be r of Middle School St¡dents 65 ôo 2 10't 228 Number of Elementary Students 145 165 4 181 495 Number of Mulfi Family Dwellings 308 216 27 2S3 844 DEVELOPMENT (1 7) Uptown Square (17) Kittb Corner (1 6) Kand¡la Toìrvnhomes (1 5) Park 16 Total Strdent Generation" 'Student Generatron rate rs based tn totals 1A FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 20I9 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2OI8 TO 2019 Item From/To Comment Percent of Pennanent Facilities 95.86% to 95.llo/o Report #3 OSPI Percent Temporary Facilities 4)4% to 4.89o/o Updated portable inventory Average C ost of Portable Classroors C onstruction C ost Allocation State Match Average Assessed Vafue Capital Bond Interest Rate Properly Tax Ler,y Rate Student Generation F actors Single-Family SFR- 5294,328 to $327,803 MFR- $109,489 to $119,431 5172,993 to $189,188 Updated 5-yr rolling average of portables purchased and placed by 2016. 5213.23 to 5225.97 Change effective J,úy 2017 65.59% to 65.150/o Change effective J,úy 2017 Per Puget Sound Educational Service District (ESD 121) Elementary Middle School High School 3.95% to 3.85%Market Rate $ l.3l to $1.20 .2200 to .2244 .1202 to .1073 .1429 to .1390 5970 to.5865 2369 to .2701 3228 to .2808 King Corurty Treasury Division Updated Horsing Inventory No te : Stu d e n t gene ra t i on fa cto rs þ r a re single fanily units are based on neu, developments constrlrcted withín the District over the lustfve (5) years prior to the date of the fee calculation. Stttdent generation factorsþr arc multi- family units are based on new developments constntcted within the District over the lust fve (5) years prior to the dote ofthe fee cet lcttlation. SFR based on the updated calculation MFR based on the updated calculation SFR based on the updated calculation MFR maximum per City of Kent Ordinance No. 4278 Multi-Farnily Elementary Middle School High School Irpact Fee City ofKent SFR- 56,842 toS7,22l MFR- $20,086 ro $19,454 SFR- 56f42to57,221 MFR - $20,086 to $8,386 35 Each Scholar: A Voice. A Dream. A BRIGHT Future. In an environment of high expectations, high support, and no excuses, the staff of Federal Way Public Schools will continually learn, lead, utilize data, and collaborate to ensure our scholars have a voice, a dreaffi, ând a bright future. 6lA,C, THE EARTY YEARS: BUILDING ÏHE FOUNDATION lwo WHOTE CHITD: THRIVIN6, RESPONSIBIE CONIIDENf, rNDtvtDuAts Êvsry rtudint slìolår will ede. kandcrqå{cr r@dy to h¿rß with tht $o¡ll em0tion¿l 5lill9 tlÊt will propcl eåô ilod$t to neét ü q(e€d gr¡& leval starúrù i0 tnglieh l¿n9uåge Aß (El¡) ¡[d Maùwâti€ by úe end of ]d gråde Eq srùdont trhol¿r üll bê Mp@sed ald prapd€d 10 ddêfop pêeül Ë¡nartility ¡¡ ords b be pG¡tivs produ.livê mmbss ol $dett, ACTIVE LËARNERS: twrte ENGAGED, EMPOWERED CRITICAL THINKERS t€y ftdeôt dþh¡ üll b€ eûp@er€d sfth Menltp of thek ed@tff ðnd be ñlly s!¡ged ¡û le(mìrg úiliÕl and oÍôtive thi¡lsr I GoNTENÏ-AREA towr:trtrËüåï I tlery íodflt (holar lr¡r¡ Kth quit¿bh opPonúilY 's:::å*#Iffil peddmåne ñ âl¡ 3újs bt tôe 6d ot 6ó gróde. ntll ¡l," Jåffi',il+,H,:I t v v HrGHscHooLI cRaounrtoNTHRouGlt succEsSFUt TRANSlll0NS fuary stodent rhole wilf r((sJfult üvigþlê úe (r¡ti(¿l lrânr¡tlqtr h ÙteÎ, st6[ngr dd sll gradu¡ls frm high st{ol Èãrly fd oü¡gq (aH, ald po3¡t(ond¡ry dp!ilffq FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Each Scholar: A voice. A dream. A BRIGHT future. , This document is published by the Business Services Department of the Federal Way Public Schools. May 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors June 11, 2018 Auburn School District No. 408 915 Fourth Street NE Auburn, Washington 98002 Unincorporated King County City of Auburn Serving Students in: Ray Vefik Robyn Mulenga Anne Baunach (253) 931-4900 City of Pacific City of Algona City of Kent City of Black Diamond Dr. Alan Spicciati, Superintendent BOARD of DIRECTORS Ryan Van Quill Laurie Bishop Section I Executive Summary ……………………Page 1 Section II Enrollment Projections…………………Page 6 Section III Standard of Service……………………Page 8 Section IV Inventory of Facilities……………………Page 16 Section V Pupil Capacity……………………………Page 20 Section VI Capital Construction Plan………………Page 23 Section VII Impact Fees………………………………Page 27 Section VIII Appendices…………………………..…Page 31 Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Page 32 Appendix A.2 - Capital Facilities Plan Projections Page 45 Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey Page 50 Table of Contents Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2018 through 2024 Section I Executive Summary 2 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 I. Executive Summary This six-year Capital Facilities Plan (the “Plan”) has been prepared by the Auburn School District (the “District”) as the District’s principal planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington’s Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This Plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2018. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District’s needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic long-range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period; other factors and trends in the use of facilities; and other needs of the District as may be required. However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this six-year Capital Facilities Plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and within the City of Auburn and City of Kent; the King County Council, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction’s respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of Algona, Pacific, and Black Diamond, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act and the local ordinances, this Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. The Plan establishes the District’s “standard of service” in order to ascertain the District’s current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the District’s specific needs. In general, the District’s current standard provides that class size for grades K-3 should not exceed 17 students and class size for grades 4-5 should not exceed 25 students. When averaged over the six elementary grades, this computes to 19.67 students per classroom. Class size for grades 6-12 should not exceed 30 students, with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers. Decisions by current legislative actions may create the need for additional classrooms. (See Section III for more specific information.) The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The District’s 2017-18 capacity was 14,717. The actual number of individual students was 16,525 as of October 1, 2017. (See Section V for more specific information.) 3 The Capital Construction Plan shown in Section VI addresses the additions and proposed modernization to the District’s existing facilities. The plan includes the replacement of five elementary schools and one middle school, construction of two new elementary schools, and acquisition of future school sites to accommodate growth. The new facilities are required to meet the projected elementary school class size reductions mandated by the State of Washington and student population increases generated by the large development areas within the Auburn School District. Three areas that have significant impact on the school district are the Lakeland South, Lea Hill, and the Auburn west hill and valley areas of the district. There are other pockets of development that impact the District as well. The District completed a comprehensive review of all district facilities in October 2008. A Steering Committee made recommendations to the Board for capital improvements to existing facilities and replacement of seven schools over the next ten years. These recommendations led to a capital improvements levy and a bond issue that was placed on the ballot in March 2009. Both ballot measures were unsuccessful in March. The Board determined to rerun only the capital improvements levy in November 2009, which the voters approved. In the fall of 2011, the Board determined to move forward with the Auburn High School Modernization and Reconstruction Project and placed the project before the voters in February of 2012. The bond issue was supported by the community at nearly 57% approval rate, but was short of the super majority requirement of 60%. In March of 2012, the Board determined to rerun the bond in November of 2012. In November 2012, the bond passed at 62%. The project was completed during the summer of 2016. In the spring of 2016, the Board determined to move forward with the replacement of six schools and the construction of two new elementary schools. The project was placed before the voters in November 2016 and the bond passed at 62.83%. The first of the projects, the replacement of Olympic Middle School, started construction in May 2018. The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the fiscal impacts incurred by a district experiencing growth and development. Section VII sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multi-family dwelling units. The student generation factors have been developed using the students who actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and multi-family developments constructed in the last five years. There have been dramatic changes in the student generation factors for single and multi-family in the past five years. The District plans to carefully monitor the numbers over the next several years to determine if this is a trend or an anomaly. The method of collecting the data is with the use of GIS mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County GIS, data from Davis Demographics and integration of the mapping with student data from the District’s student data system. This method gives the District actual student generation numbers for each grade span for identified developments. This data is contained in Appendix A.3. Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2017 Capital Facilities Plan that are a part of the 2018 Plan. The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference. Section I Executive Summary A. Updated to reflect new information within the Plan. B. Summary level list of changes from previous year. Section II Enrollment Projections Updated projections. See Appendices A.1 & A.2. Section III Standard of Service A. Reduction of maximum K-3 class size from between 18.23 and 24 students to 17 students at elementary schools. B. Reduction of maximum fourth grade class size from 26 students to 25 students. C. Reduction of maximum 5th grade class size from 29 students to 25 students. Section IV Inventory of Facilities A. Add 2 portables at Alpac Elementary School. B. Add 3 portables at Lea Hill Elementary School. C. Add 1 portable at Terminal Park Elementary School. D. Add 1 portable at Washington Elementary School. E. Remove 1 portable from Pioneer Elementary School. Section V Pupil Capacity The six portables to be placed and the one portable to be relocated in August 2018 are needed to accommodate enrollment increases. Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 Impact Fees CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2017 to 2018 CPF CPF 2017 2018 EXPLANATION Student Generation Factors Single Family Consistent with King County Ordinance 11621, Elementary 0.1930 0.2340 Student Generation Factors are calculated Middle School 0.0770 0.0970 by the school district based on district Sr. High 0.0730 0.1230 records of average actual student generation Multi-Family rates for new developments constructed Elementary 0.1030 0.2190 over the last five years. Middle School 0.0310 0.1070 Sr. High 0.0440 0.1060 School Construction Costs Elementary $48,500,000 $60,200,000 Site Acquisition Costs Cost per acre $434,136 $344,240 Updated estimate based on 2.5% annual inflation Area Cost Allowance Boeckh Index $213.23 $225.97 Updated to projected SPI schedule. (July 2018) Match % - State 63.29%64.99%Updated to current SPI schedule (May 2017) Match % - District 36.71%35.01%Computed District Average AV Single Family $292,035 $373,974 Updated from March 2018 King County Dept of Assessments data. Multi-Family $127,147 $139,135 Updated from March 2018 King County Dept of Assessments data using average AV for apartments and condominiums. Debt Serv Tax Rate $2.65 $2.41 Current Fiscal Year GO Bond Int Rate 3.95%3.27%Current Rate (Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-14) Section VIII Appendices Appendix A.1 - Updated enrollment projections from October 1, 2017 Appendix A.2 - Updated enrollment projections with anticipated buildout schedule from April 2018 Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey April 2018 DATA ELEMENTS From new school construction cost estimate in April 2018. Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2018 through 2024 Section II Enrollment Projections Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 7 The Auburn School District uses a modified cohort survival model to project future enrollment for all of the District's operations. Table II.1 is an extract from the comprehensive projection model found in Appendix A.2 titled "CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections". This Table shows the anticipated enrollment for the next six years based on the previous six year history of the District under the assumptions set forth in the comprehensive projections, Appendix A.1, and the projection for additional students generated from new developments in the district as shown in Appendix A.2. TABLE ASD ENROLLMENT II.1 PROJECTIONS (April 2018) 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-2024 GRADE Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected KDG 1261 1294 1326 1359 1391 1424 1457 1 1276 1320 1353 1386 1418 1451 1483 2 1252 1314 1359 1391 1424 1456 1489 3 1328 1284 1346 1391 1423 1456 1488 4 1329 1355 1311 1373 1418 1450 1483 5 1269 1361 1387 1343 1406 1450 1483 K - 5 7715 7928 8082 8243 8480 8687 8883 6 1207 1268 1360 1386 1342 1405 1449 7 1194 1240 1301 1394 1420 1376 1438 8 1183 1221 1268 1329 1421 1447 1403 6 - 8 3584 3729 3929 4109 4183 4228 4290 9 1258 1357 1395 1442 1503 1595 1621 10 1300 1287 1386 1424 1470 1531 1624 11 1249 1288 1274 1374 1412 1458 1519 12 1419 1347 1386 1372 1472 1510 1556 9 - 12 5226 5279 5441 5612 5857 6094 6320 TOTALS 16,525 16,936 17,452 17,964 18,520 19,009 19,493 GRADES K-12 Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected K-5 7715 7928 8082 8243 8480 8687 8883 6-8 3584 3729 3929 4109 4183 4228 4290 9-12 5226 5279 5441 5612 5857 6094 6320 K-12 16,525 16,936 17,452 17,964 18,520 19,009 19,493 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2018 through 2024 Section III Standard of Service Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 STANDARD OF SERVICE 9 The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent indicate that each school district must establish a "Standard of Service" in order to ascertain the overall capacity to house its projected student population. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage "capacity" guidelines for computing state funding support. The fundamental purpose of the SPI guidelines is to provide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching funds for school construction projects. By default these guidelines have been used to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population. The SPI guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, facility configurations, emerging educational reform, or the dynamics of each student's educational program. The Auburn School District Standard of Service addresses those local considerations that require space in excess of the SPI guidelines. The effect on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation pattern. Conditions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without accompanying computations. OVERVIEW The Auburn School District operates fourteen elementary schools housing 7,715 students in grades K through 5. The four middle schools house 3,884 students in grades 6 through 8. The District operates three comprehensive senior high schools and one alternative high school, housing 5,226 students in grades 9 through 12. CLASS SIZE The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the student population. Specialists create additional space needs. Class sizes are subject to collective bargaining agreements. Changes to class size agreements can have significant impact on available space. The current pupil/teacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 19.67 students per teacher. Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 19.67 students per room at grades K - 5. At grades 6 - 12 the limit is set at 30 pupils per room. The SPI space allocation for each grade articulation level, less the computed reduction for the Auburn School District Standard of Service, determines the District's capacity to house projected pupil populations. These reductions are shown below by grade articulation level. STRUCTURED LEARNING FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate to severe disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses 14 classrooms to provide for 115 students. The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPI space guidelines. No loss of capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to total elementary population. PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates an adaptive behavior program for students with behavior disabilities at the elementary school level. The program uses two classrooms to provide for 22 students. The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space allocations. (Two classrooms @ 19.67 - 11 = 8.67) Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 8.67 each =(17) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 8.67 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(17) ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 STANDARD OF SERVICE 10 SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities. Sixteen standard classrooms are required to house this program. The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space guidelines. Continued loss of capacity is expected as growth in program is larger than the total elementary population. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 (16-8) rooms @ 19.67 each =(157) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(157) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the elementary level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 19.67 each =(20) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(20) HEAD START The Auburn School District operates a Head Start program for approximately 114 pre-school aged children in six sections of 1/2 day in length. The program is housed at three elementary schools and utilizes three standard elementary classrooms and auxiliary office spaces. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 19.67 each =(59) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(59) EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a pre-school program for young children below age five with disabilities. This program is housed at eight different elementary schools and currently uses 12 standard classrooms. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 12 rooms @ 19.67 each =(236) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(236) READING LABS The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional language arts instruction. These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces if available in each elementary school. Four elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available, thus they are housed in a standard classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 19.67 each =(79) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(79) Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 STANDARD OF SERVICE 11 MUSIC ROOMS The Auburn School District elementary music programs require one acoustically modified classroom at each school for music instruction. The housing requirements are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 19.67 each =(275) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(275) ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates pullout programs at the elementary school level for students learning English as a second language. This program requires 21 standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 21 rooms @ 19.67 each =(413) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(413) SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for eight highly impacted elementary schools. This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade level and do not receive other services. This program requires eight standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 19.67 each =(157) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(157) ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a learning specialist program to increase literacy skills for first and second graders. This program model was originally created from the I-728 funds and currently has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms, as well as pulling out students into designated classrooms. The district is utilizing classrooms at all fourteen elementary schools. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 19.67 each =(275) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(275) EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates an ECEAP program for 132 pre-school aged children in six sections of half-day length and one full-day program. The program is housed at one elementary school and two off-site locations and utilizes one standard elementary classroom and three additional classroom spaces and auxiliary office spaces. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 19.67 each =(79) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(79) Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 STANDARD OF SERVICE 12 SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level. This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific disabilities. Eleven classrooms are required at the middle school level to provide for approximately 282 students. The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the SPI space guidelines. PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior disabilities. The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses two classrooms. One of the two classrooms for this program are provided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 rooms @ 30 each =(30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (30) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates five structured learning classrooms at the middle school level for students with moderate to severe disabilities and one developmentally disabled classroom for students with profound disabilities. Two of the five classrooms for this program are provided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 30 each =(90) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (90) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the middle school level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 30 each =(30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (30) MIDDLE SCHOOL COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates a minimum of one computer lab at each of the four middle schools. This program utilizes a standard classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each =(120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for English Language Learner students. This program requires seven standard classrooms that are not provide for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 30 each =(210) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (210) MIDDLE SCHOOLS Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 STANDARD OF SERVICE 13 ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. SPI Report #3 dated 12/14/11 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the mid-level facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each =(240) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (240) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the high school level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 30 each =(30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (30) SENIOR HIGH COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates two computer labs at each of the senior high schools. This program utilizes two standard classrooms at comprehensive high schools and one at West Auburn. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 30 each =(210) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (210) ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at three comprehensive high schools for English Language Learner students. This program requires five standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 30 each =(150) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (150) PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior diabilities. The program is housed at one of the high schools and uses two classrooms. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 30 each =(60) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (60) SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 STANDARD OF SERVICE 14 STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates nine structured learning center classrooms for students with moderate to severe disabilities. This program is housed at two high schools requiring eight standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each =(240) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (240) SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities. The current high school program requires 14 classrooms to provide program to meet educational needs of the students. The SPI space guidelines provide for one of the 14 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 13 rooms @ 30 each =(390) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (390) PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center. The SPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity. This space was not intended for, nor is it usable for, classroom instruction. It was constructed to provide a community center for the performing arts. Using SPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet computes to 208 unhoused students or 8.33 classrooms. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8.33 rooms @ 30 each =(250) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. There are 185 teaching stations available in the senior high facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 10 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 30 each =(300) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (300) Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 STANDARD OF SERVICE 15 STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS ELEMENTARY Loss of Permanent Capacity (1,768) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,768) MIDDLE SCHOOL Loss of Permanent Capacity (720) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (720) SENIOR HIGH Loss of Permanent Capacity (1,630) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,630) TOTAL Loss of Permanent Capacity (4,118) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (4,118) Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2018 through 2024 Section IV Inventory of Facilities Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES 17 Table IV.1 shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OSPI rated capacities. Table IV.2 shows the number and location of each portable unit by school. The district uses relocatable facilities to: 1. provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting, 2. make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique student needs, and 3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on existing physical plants. Core facilities (i.e. gymnasiums, restrooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc.) are not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable classrooms. District School Facilities Building Capacity Acres Address Elementary Schools Washington Elementary 486 5.40 20 E Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Terminal Park Elementary 408 6.70 1101 D Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Dick Scobee Elementary 477 10.50 1031 14th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Pioneer Elementary 441 8.30 2301 M Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Chinook Elementary 440 8.75 3502 Auburn Way South, Auburn WA, 98092 Lea Hill Elementary 450 10.00 30908 124th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Gildo Rey Elementary 551 10.00 1005 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Evergreen Heights Elem. 456 8.09 5602 South 316th, Auburn WA, 98001 Alpac Elementary 497 10.60 310 Milwaukee Boulevard North, Pacific WA, 98047 Lake View Elementary 559 16.40 16401 Southeast 318th Street, Auburn WA, 98092 Hazelwood Elementary 580 12.67 11815 Southeast 304th Street, Auburn WA, 98092 Ilalko Elementary 585 12.00 301 Oravetz Place Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Lakeland Hills Elementary 594 12.00 1020 Evergreen Way SE, Auburn WA, 98092 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 614 10.00 29205 132nd Street SE, Auburn WA, 98092 ELEMENTARY CAPACITY 7,138 Middle Schools Cascade Middle School 829 17.30 1015 24th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Olympic Middle School 921 17.40 1825 K Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Rainier Middle School 843 26.33 30620 116th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Mt. Baker Middle School 837 30.88 620 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3,430 Senior High Schools West Auburn HS 233 5.10 401 West Main Street, Auburn WA, 98001 Auburn HS 2,100 20.50 711 East Main Street, Auburn WA, 98002 Auburn Riverside HS 1,387 33.00 501 Oravetz Road, Auburn WA, 98092 Auburn Mountainview HS 1,443 40.00 28900 124th Ave SE, Auburn WA, 98092 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5,164 TOTAL CAPACITY 15,732 Table Permanent Facilities IV.1 @ OSPI Rated Capacity (March 2018) Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES 19 TABLE TEMPORARY/RELOCATABLE IV.2 FACILITIES INVENTORY (June 2018) Elementary Location 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 Washington 6 6 6 6 7 8 8 Terminal Park 7 7 7 7 7 0 0 Dick Scobee 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pioneer 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 Chinook 6 6 6 0 0 0 0 Lea Hill 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 Gildo Rey 7 7 8 8 8 9 9 Evergreen Heights 4 4 6 6 6 6 6 Alpac 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 Lake View 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 Hazelwood 2 3 4 4 5 6 6 Ilalko 6 7 7 7 8 9 9 Lakeland Hills Elementary 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 4 5 6 6 6 6 6 TOTAL UNITS 81 77 77 72 66 64 64 TOTAL CAPACITY 1,593 1,515 1,515 1,416 1,298 1,259 1,259 Middle School Location 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 Cascade 0 0 0 2 4 5 5 Olympic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rainier 5 7 7 8 9 10 10 Mt. Baker 9 10 10 10 11 11 11 TOTAL UNITS 14 17 17 20 24 26 26 TOTAL CAPACITY 420 510 510 600 720 780 780 Sr. High School Location 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 West Auburn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Auburn High School 0 0 0 1 2 2 2 Auburn High School - *TAP 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Auburn Riverside 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 Auburn Mountainview 4 5 5 6 7 7 7 TOTAL UNITS 18 19 19 21 23 23 23 TOTAL CAPACITY 540 570 570 630 690 690 690 *TAP - Transition Assistance Program for 18-21 year old students with special needs. COMBINED TOTAL UNITS 113 113 113 113 113 113 113 COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY 2,553 2,595 2,595 2,646 2,708 2,729 2,729 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2018 through 2024 Section V Pupil Capacity Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 PUPIL CAPACITY 21 While the Auburn School District uses the SPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from which to determine space needs, the District's educational program requires more space than that provided for under the formula. This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in Section III, Standard of Service. The District's capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional space to house its programs. Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new funded facilities. The combined effect of these adjustments is shown on Line B in Tables V.1 and V.2 below. Table V.1 shows the Distict's capacity with relocatable units included and Table V.2 without these units. Table V.1 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-2025 A.SPI Capacity 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,382 17,032 17,032 17,032 A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 650 650 B.Capacity Adjustments (1,565)(1,523)(1,523)(1,472)(1,410)(1,389)(1,389) C.Net Capacity 14,167 14,209 14,859 15,560 15,622 15,643 15,643 D.ASD Enrollment 16,937 17,453 17,963 18,520 19,009 19,493 19,963 3/E.ASD Surplus/Deficit (2,770)(3,244)(3,104)(2,960)(3,387)(3,850)(4,320) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Include Relocatable 2,553 2,595 2,595 2,646 2,708 2,729 2,729 2/Exclude SOS (pg 14)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118) Total Adjustments (1,565)(1,523)(1,523)(1,472)(1,410)(1,389)(1,389) Table V.2 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-2025 A.SPI Capacity 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,382 17,032 17,032 17,032 A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 650 650 B.Capacity Adjustments (4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118) C.Net Capacity 11,614 11,614 12,264 12,914 12,914 12,914 12,914 D.ASD Enrollment 16,937 17,453 17,963 18,520 19,009 19,493 19,963 3/E.ASD Surplus/Deficit (5,323)(5,839)(5,699)(5,606)(6,095)(6,579)(7,049) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS 2/Exclude SOS (pg 14)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118) Total Adjustments (4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118)(4,118) 1/New facilities shown in 2019-20 through 2023-24 are funded by the 2016 School Bond Issue. 2/The Standard of Service represents 26.18% of SPI capacity. When new facilities are added the Standard of Service computations are decreased to 24.18% of SPI capacity. 3/Students beyond the capacity are accommodated in other spaces (commons, library, theater, shared teaching space). Capacity WITH relocatables Capacity WITHOUT relocatables Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 PUPIL CAPACITY 22 A.Elementary Schools Building 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 Washington 486 486 486 486 486 486 486 Terminal Park 408 408 408 408 408 408 408 Dick Scobee 477 477 477 477 477 477 477 Pioneer 441 441 441 441 441 441 441 Chinook 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 Lea Hill 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 Gildo Rey 551 551 551 551 551 551 551 Evergreen Heights 456 456 456 456 456 456 456 Alpac 497 497 497 497 497 497 497 Lake View 559 559 559 559 559 559 559 Hazelwood 580 580 580 580 580 580 580 Ilalko 585 585 585 585 585 585 585 Lakeland Hills 594 594 594 594 594 594 594 Arthur Jacobsen 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 Elementary #15 650 650 650 650 650 Elementary #16 650 650 650 650 ELEMENTARY CAPACITY 7,138 7,138 7,788 8,438 8,438 8,438 8,438 B.Middle Schools Building 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 Cascade 829 829 829 829 829 829 829 Olympic 921 921 921 921 921 921 921 Rainier 843 843 843 843 843 843 843 Mt. Baker 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 C.Senior High Schools Building 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 West Auburn 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 Auburn 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 Auburn Riverside 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 Auburn Mountainview 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 COMBINED CAPACITY 15,732 15,732 16,382 17,032 17,032 17,032 17,032 PERMANENT FACILITIES @ SPI Rated Capacity (March 2018) Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2018 through 2024 Section VI Capital Construction Plan Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN 24 The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974 with the formation of a community wide citizens committee. The result of this committee's work was published in the document titled 'Guidelines for Development.' In 1985 the Board formed a second Ad Hoc citizens committee to further the work of the first and address the needs of the District for subsequent years. The work of this committee was published in the document titled 'Directions for the Nineties.' In 1995 the Board commissioned a third Ad Hoc citizens committee to make recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and physical facilities. The committee recommendations are published in the document titled 'Education Into The Twenty-First Century - - A Community Involved.' The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop plans for the implementation, funding, and deployment of technology throughout the District's programs. The 1996 Bond proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate technological applications. The 1998 Capital Levy provided funding to further deploy technology at a level sufficient to support program requirements in every classroom and department. In 2005 and 2014, replacement technology levies were approved to continue to support technology across all facets of the District’s teaching, learning and operations. In addition to the technology needs of the District, the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District must prepare for continued student enrollment growth. As stated in their report, "the District must pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible." The Ad Hoc recommendation included commentary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent rates of tax assessments. A proposition was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that provided $8,000,000 over six years to address some of the technology needs of the District; and $5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire school sites. During the 1997-98 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Dieringer School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population from an area that includes a large development known as Lakeland South. Lakeland South at that time was immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the Auburn School District. On June 16, 1998, the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Dieringer Boards of Directors. On June 22, 1998, the Auburn School Board adopted Resolution No. 933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 23, 1998, the Dieringer School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 24-97-98 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from Dieringer to Auburn containing most of the Lakeland South development and certain other undeveloped properties. Property for the third comprehensive high school was acquired in 1999. The Board placed the proposition to construction a new high school on the ballot four times. Each election was extremely close to passing. After the fourth failure a community meeting was held and from that meeting the Board determined need for further community study. In April of 2002, the Board formed a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two items and make recommendations to the Board in the Fall of 2002: a. A review of the conclusion and recommendations of 1985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees related to accommodating high school enrollment growth. This included the review of possible financing plans for new facilities. b. Develop recommendations for accommodating high school enrollment growth for the next 10 years if a new senior high school is not built. Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN 25 This committee recommended the Board place the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in February 2003. The February election approved the new high school at 68.71% yes votes. The school opened in the fall of 2005. In the fall of 2003, the Board directed the administration to begin the planning and design for Elementary #13 and Elementary #14. In the fall of 2004, the Board passed Resolution No. 1054 to place two elementary schools on the ballot in February 2005. The voters approved the ballot measure in February of 2005 at 64.72%. Lakeland Hills Elementary (Elementary #13) opened in the fall of 2006. Arthur Jacobsen Elementary (Elementary #14) is located in the Lea Hill area and opened in the fall of 2007. These two elementary schools were built to accommodate the housing growth in Lakeland Hills and Lea Hill areas of the school district. In the 2004-05 school year, the Board convened a sixth Citizen’s Ad Hoc committee to again study and make recommendations about the future impacts in the District. One of the areas of study was the need for New Facilities and Modernization. The committee made a number of recommendations including school size, the need for a new middle school, and to begin a capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities based upon criterion. During the 2005-06 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Kent School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population that will come from an area that includes a number of projected developments in the north Auburn valley. On May 17, 2006, the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Kent Boards of Directors. On June 14, 2006, the Kent School Board adopted Resolution No. 1225 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 26, 2006, the Auburn School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 1073 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from the Kent School District to the Auburn School District effective September 29, 2006. In October of 2008, after two years of review and study, a Steering Committee made recommendations to the Board regarding the capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities as recommended by the 2004-05 Citizen’s Ad Hoc Committee. These recommendations, based on specific criteria, led to the Board placing a school improvement bond and capital improvements levy on the ballot in March 2009. Voters did not approve either measure that would have updated 24 facilities and replaced three aging schools. The Board decided to place only a six- year Capital Levy on the ballot in November of 2009, which passed at 55.17%. The levy funded $46.4 million of needed improvement projects at 24 sites over the following seven school years. Planning for the replacement of aging schools was started with educational specifications and schematic design process for the replacement of Auburn High School. The District acquired a site for a future high school in 2008 and a second site for a future middle school in 2009. The District also continued efforts to acquire property around Auburn High School. The Special Education Transition Facility opened in February of 2010. This facility is designed for students with disabilities that are 18 to 21 years old. In the November 2012 election, the community supported the $110 million bond issue for the Auburn High School Modernization and Reconstruction Project at 62%. Construction began in February 2013. The entire new building was occupied by Auburn High School students and staff in the fall of 2015, with site improvements being completed during the 2015-16 school year. Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN 26 In January 2015, a citizen’s ad hoc committee was convened by direction of the Board to address growth and facilities. The major recommendations were to construct two new elementary schools in the next four years and to acquire 3 new elementary school sites as soon as possible. In the November 2016 election, the community supported the $456 million bond issue for the replacement of six schools and the construction of two new elementary schools at 62.83%. Construction for the replacement of Olympic Middle School began in May 2018. Within the six-year period, the District is projecting 3,710 additional students. This increase in student population along with anticipated class-size reductions, will require the construction of two new elementary schools and acquiring three new elementary school sites during the six-year window. In addition to new and replacement school construction, this District needs to address several major construction projects to accommodate enrollment growth and continued District use. These projects include replacement of or improvements to the roof at Auburn Memorial Stadium, boiler replacement at Auburn Mountainview High School, and energy management system replacement at Auburn Riverside High School that are funded by Capital Levy dollars. The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years. The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population. 2018-24 Capital Construction Plan (May 2018) Projected Fund Project Timelines Project Funded Cost Source 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 24-25 All Facilities - Technology 2013 Yes $22,000,000 6 Year XX XX Modernization Cap. Levy 1/ Portables Yes $2,500,000 Impact Fees XX XX XX XX 1/ Property Purchase - 3 New Elementaries Yes $14,900,000 Bond Impact Fee XX XX XX XX XX XX Multiple Facility Improvements Yes $46,400,000 Capital Levy XX XX 1/ Elementary #15 Yes $48,500,000 Bond Impact Fee XX plan XX const XX open 1/ Elementary #16 Yes $48,500,000 Bond Impact Fee XX plan XX const XX open 1/ Replacement of five Elementary Schools Yes $242,500,000 Bond XX plan XX const XX const XX const XX const XX open 1/ Replacement of one Middle School Yes $78,000,000 Bond XX const XX open 1/ These funds may be secured through a combination of the 2016 Bond Issue, sale of real property, impact fees, and state matching funds. The District currently is eligible for state matching funds for new construction at the elementary school level and for modernization at the elementary and middle school levels. Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2018 through 2024 Section VII Impact Fees Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 28 IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION (Spring 2018) Elementary #15 within 2 year period Elementary #16 within 3 year period I. SITE COST PER RESIDENCE Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Size) x Student Factor Site Cost/ Facility Student Generation Factor Cost/Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Family Elem (K - 5)12 $344,240 650 0.2340 0.2190 $1,487.12 $1,391.79 Middle Sch (6 - 8)25 $0 800 0.0970 0.1070 $0.00 $0.00 Sr High (9 - 12)40 $0 1500 0.1230 0.1060 $0.00 $0.00 $1,487.12 $1,391.79 II. PERMANENT FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCE Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Size) x Student Factor) x (Permanent to Total Square Footage Percentage) Facility Facility % Perm Sq Ft/Student Generation Factor Cost/Cost/ Single Family Cost Size Total Sq Ft Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Family Elem (K - 5)$60,200,000 650 0.9422 0.2340 0.2190 $20,420.40 $19,111.40 Mid Sch (6 - 8)$0 800 0.9422 0.0970 0.1070 $0.00 $0.00 Sr High (9 - 12)$0 1500 0.9422 0.1230 0.1060 $0.00 $0.00 $20,420.40 $19,111.40 III. TEMPORARY FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCE Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Size) x Student Factor) x (Temporary to Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Facility % Temp Sq Ft/Student Generation Factor Cost/Cost/ Single Family Cost Size Total Sq Ft Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Family Elem (K - 5)$180,000 19.67 0.0578 0.2340 0.2190 $123.67 $115.74 Mid Sch (6 - 8)$180,000 30 0.0578 0.0970 0.1070 $33.61 $37.08 Sr High (9 - 12)$180,000 30 0.0578 0.1230 0.1060 $42.62 $36.73 $199.89 $189.55 IV. STATE MATCH CREDIT PER RESIDENCE Formula: (Boeckh Index x SPI Footage x District Match x Student Factor) Boeckh SPI State Cost/Cost/ Index Footage Match Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Family Elem (K - 5)$225.97 90 64.99%0.2340 0.2190 $3,092.83 $2,894.57 Mid Sch (6 - 8)$0.00 108 64.99%0.0970 0.1070 $0.00 $0.00 Sr High (9 - 12)$0.00 130 64.99%0.1230 0.1060 $0.00 $0.00 $3,092.83 $2,894.58 Student Generation Factor Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 29 V. TAX CREDIT PER RESIDENCE Formula: Expressed as the present value of an annuity TC = PV(interest rate,discount period,average assd value x tax rate) Ave Resid Curr Dbt Serv Bnd Byr Indx Number of Tax Credit Tax Credit Assd Value Tax Rate Ann Int Rate Years Single Family Multi Family Single Family $373,974 $2.41 3.27%10 $7,583.22 Multi Family $139,135 $2.41 3.27%10 $2,821.30 VI. DEVELOPER PROVIDED FACILITY CREDIT Formula: (Value of Site or Facility/Number of dwelling units) Value No. of Units Facility Credit Single Family $0.00 1 $0.00 Multi Family $0.00 1 $0.00 FEE PER UNIT IMPACT FEES RECAP Single Multi SUMMARY Family Family Site Costs $1,487.12 $1,391.79 Permanent Facility Const Costs $20,420.40 $19,111.40 Temporary Facility Costs $199.89 $189.55 State Match Credit ($3,092.83)($2,894.58) Tax Credit ($7,583.22)($2,821.30) FEE (No Discount)$11,431.36 $14,976.86 FEE (50% Discount)$5,715.68 $7,488.43 Less ASD Discount ($3,000.00) Facility Credit $0.00 $0.00 Net Fee Obligation $5,715.68 $4,488.43 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 30 SINGLE FAMILY MULTI FAMILY IMPACT FEE ELEMENTS Elem Mid Sch Sr High Elem Mid Sch Sr High K - 5 6 - 8 9 - 12 K - 5 6 - 8 9 - 12 Student Factor Single Family - Auburn actual count April 2017 0.234 0.097 0.123 0.219 0.107 0.106 New Fac Capacity 650 800 1500 650 800 1500 New Facility Cost Elementary Cost Estimates April 2017 $60,200,000 $60,200,000 Temp Rm Capacity ASD District Standard of Service.19.67 30 30 19.67 30 30 Grades K - 5 @ 19.67 and 6 - 12 @ 30. Temp Facility Cost Relocatables, including site work, set up, and furnishing $180,000 $180,000 $180,000 $180,000 $180,000 $180,000 Site Acreage ASD District Standard or SPI Minimum 12 25 40 12 25 40 Site Cost/Acre See below $344,240 $344,240 $344,240 $344,240 $344,240 $344,240 Perm Sq Footage 14 Elementary, 4 Middle, and 4 High Schools 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,695,317 Temp Sq Footage 113 portables at 896 sq. ft. each + TAP 2661 103,909 103,909 103,909 103,909 103,909 103,909 Total Sq Footage Sum of Permanent and Temporary above 1,799,226 1,799,226 1,799,226 1,799,226 1,799,226 1,799,226 % - Perm Facilities Permanent Sq. Footage divided by Total Sq. Footage 94.22%94.22%94.22%94.22%94.22%94.22% % - Temp Facilities Temporary Sq. Footage divided by Total Sq. Footage 5.78%5.78%5.78%5.78%5.78%5.78% SPI Sq Ft/Student From SPI Regulations 90 108 130 90 108 130 Boeckh Index From SPI projection for July 2018 $225.97 $225.97 $225.97 $225.97 $225.97 $225.97 Match % - State From OSPI May 2018 64.99%64.99%64.99%64.99%64.99%64.99% Match % - District Computed 35.01%35.01%35.01%35.01%35.01%35.01% Dist Aver AV King County Department of Assessments March 2015 $292,035 $292,035 $292,035 $127,147 $127,147 $127,147 Debt Serv Tax Rate Current Fiscal Year $2.41 $2.41 $2.41 $2.41 $2.41 $2.41 G. O Bond Int Rate Current Rate - (Bond Buyer 20 Index March 2017)3.27%3.27%3.27%3.27%3.27%3.27% Site Cost Projections Recent Property Purchase Purchase Purchase Adjusted Projected Annual Sites Latest Date Projected Acquisitions Acreage Year Price Cost/Acre Present Day Inflation Factor Required of Acquisition Cost/Acre Lakeland 12.00 2002 $2,701,043 $225,087 $334,143 2.50%Elementary 2018 $344,240 Labrador 35.00 2008 $7,601,799 $217,194 $278,027 2.50%Elementary 2018 $344,240 Lakeland East 27.00 2009 $9,092,160 $336,747 $420,550 2.50%Elementary 2022 $379,977 Total 74.00 $19,395,002 $262,095 $344,240 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2018 through 2024 Section VIII Appendix Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections 1 Auburn School District #408 Student Enrollment Projections October 2017 Introduction The projective techniques give some consideration to historical and current data as a basis for forecasting the future. In addition, the ‘projector’ must make certain assumptions about the operant variables within the data being used. These assumptions are “judgmental” by definition. Forecasting can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future, or from the known to the unknown. The attached tabular data reviews the history of student enrollment, sets out some quantitative assumptions, and provides projections based on these numerical factors. The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, psychological, economic, and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection. The logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today, and will be in the future. It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over thirteen years and six years respectively. The results provide a trend, which reflects a long (13-year) and a short (6-year) base from which to extrapolate. Two methods of estimating the number of kindergarten students have been used. The first uses the average increase or decrease over the past 13 and 6-year time frame and adds it to each succeeding year. The second derives what the average percentage Auburn kindergartners have been of live births in King County for the past 5 years and uses this to project the subsequent four years. The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact. This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections. Monitoring deviation is critical to the viability and credibility of the projections derived by these techniques. Tables Table 1 – Thirteen Year History of October 1 Enrollments – page 3 The data shown in this table is the baseline information used to project future enrollment. This data shows the past record of enrollment in the district on October 1 of each year. Table 2 – Historical Factors Used in Projections - page 4 This table shows the three basic factors derived from the data in Table 1. These factors have been used in the subsequent projections. The three factors are: • Factor 1 – Average Pupil Change Between Grade Levels This factor is sometimes referred to as the “holding power” or “cohort survival.” It is a measure of the number of pupils gained or lost as they move from one grade level to the next. • Factor 2 – Average Pupil Change by Grade Level This factor is the average change at each grade level over the 13 or 6-year period. • Factor 3 – Auburn School District Kindergarten Enrollment as a Function of King County Live Births. This factor calculates what percent each kindergarten class was of the King County live births in the five previous years. From this information has been extrapolated the kindergarten pupils expected for the next four years. 2 Table 3 – Projection Models – pages 5-13 This set of tables utilizes the above mentioned variables and generates several projections. The models are explained briefly below.  Table 3.13 (pg 5) – shows a projection based on the 13-year average gain in kindergarten (Factor 2) and the 13-year average change between grade levels (Factor 1). The data is shown for the district as a whole.  Table 3.6 (pg 5) – shows a projection using the same scheme as Table 3.13 except it shortens the historical data to only the most recent 6 years.  Table 3.13A and 3.6A (pg 6) – uses the same factors above except Factor 3 is substituted for Factor 2. The kindergarten rates are derived from the King County live births instead of the average gain.  Tables 3E.13, 3E.6, 3E.13A, 3E.6A (pg 7) – breaks out the K-5 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation.  Tables 3MS.13, 3MS.6, 3MS.13A, 3MS.6A (pg 8) – breaks out the 6-8 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation.  Tables 3SH.13, 3SH.6, 3SH.13A, 3SH.6A (pg 9) – breaks out the 9-12 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation.  Table 4 (pg 10) – Collects the four projection models by grade group for ease of comparison.  Table 5 (pgs 11-13) – shows how well each projection model performed when compared with actual enrollments. Data is provided in both number and percent formats for the past 13 years. Summary This year is the sixth consecutive year of an increase in enrollment after three consecutive years of declining enrollment. The increase of 580 students changes our historical average gain/loss in students. Over the past 6 years the average gain is now 2.37% annually, which equates to an average annual gain of 360 students. Using the cohort survival models, the data below is a summary of the range of variation between the four models. This data can be used for planning for future needs of the district. The models show changes in the next six years:  Elementary level show increases ranging from 833 to 1,168. (page 7)  Middle School level show increases ranging from 542 to 706. (page 8)  High School level show increases ranging from 855 to 1,094. (page 9) The models show these changes looking forward thirteen years:  Elementary level show increases ranging from 1,904 to 2,537. (page 7)  Middle School level show increases ranging from 1,110 to 1,444. (page 8)  High School level show increases ranging from 1,485 to 1,995. (page 9) This data does not factor new developments that are currently under construction or in the planning stages. AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2017 prj17-18 Page 3 TABLE 1 Thirteen Year History of October 1 Enrollments Actual GRADE 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 GRADE KDG 955 941 996 998 1032 1010 1029 1098 1170 1232 1198 1237 1261 KDG 1 963 1012 995 1015 1033 1066 1068 1089 1188 1219 1279 1210 1276 1 2 963 1002 1019 1024 998 1016 1097 1083 1124 1196 1289 1300 1252 2 3 1002 1031 997 1048 993 1013 996 1111 1125 1136 1232 1317 1328 3 4 939 1049 1057 1044 1073 1024 1022 1038 1123 1156 1170 1237 1329 4 5 1065 998 1078 1069 1030 1079 1018 1070 1075 1122 1172 1199 1269 5 6 1004 1058 1007 1096 1040 1041 1063 1041 1076 1059 1116 1152 1207 6 7 1028 1014 1057 1034 1125 1060 1032 1086 1072 1091 1099 1132 1194 7 8 1137 1072 1033 1076 1031 1112 1046 1017 1116 1088 1136 1108 1183 8 9 1379 1372 1337 1256 1244 1221 1273 1200 1159 1275 1229 1261 1258 9 10 1383 1400 1368 1341 1277 1238 1170 1278 1229 1169 1316 1248 1300 10 11 1182 1322 1352 1350 1303 1258 1233 1164 1240 1211 1167 1318 1249 11 12 1088 1147 1263 1352 1410 1344 1316 1321 1274 1323 1260 1226 1419 12 TOTALS 14,088 14,418 14,559 14,703 14,589 14,482 14,363 14,596 14,971 15,277 15,663 15,945 16,525 Percent of Gain 2.34%0.98%0.99%(0.78)%(0.73)%(0.82)%1.62%2.57%2.04%2.53%1.80%3.64% Student Gain 330 141 144 (114)(107)(119)233 375 306 386 282 580 Average % Gain for 1st 6 years.0.33%Average % Gain for last 6 years 2.37% Average Student Gain for 1st 6 years.46 Average Student Gain for last 6 years 360 Average % Gain for 13 years.1.35% Average Student Gain for 13 years.203 TABLE 1A Grade Group Combinations 17-18 KDG 955 941 996 998 1032 1010 1029 1098 1170 1232 1198 1237 1261 K,1,2 2881 2955 3010 3037 3063 3092 3194 3270 3482 3647 3766 3747 3789 K - 5 5887 6033 6142 6198 6159 6208 6230 6489 6805 7061 7340 7500 7715 K - 6 6891 7091 7149 7294 7199 7249 7293 7530 7881 8120 8456 8652 8922 1 - 3 2928 3045 3011 3087 3024 3095 3161 3283 3437 3551 3800 3827 3856 1 - 5 4932 5092 5146 5200 5127 5198 5201 5391 5635 5829 6142 6263 6454 1 - 6 5936 6150 6153 6296 6167 6239 6264 6432 6711 6888 7258 7415 7661 6 - 8 3169 3144 3097 3206 3196 3213 3141 3144 3264 3238 3351 3392 3584 7 - 8 2165 2086 2090 2110 2156 2172 2078 2103 2188 2179 2235 2240 2377 7 - 9 3544 3458 3427 3366 3400 3393 3351 3303 3347 3454 3464 3501 3635 9 - 12 5032 5241 5320 5299 5234 5061 4992 4963 4902 4978 4972 5053 5226 10 - 12 3653 3869 3983 4043 3990 3840 3719 3763 3743 3703 3743 3792 3968 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2017 prj17-18 Page 4 Factor Average Student Change Between Factor 1 Grade Levels 3 CALENDAR YEAR TOTAL LIVE BIRTHS 2/3 RD BIRTHS 1/3RD BIRTHS YEAR OF ENROLL ADJ LIVE BIRTHS KDG ENROLL 1979 16,524 11,016 5,508 1985-86 16,708 792 4.740% K to 1 46.17 K to 1 59.40 1980 16,800 11,200 5,600 1986-87 17,955 829 4.617% 1 to 2 21.92 1 to 2 38.20 1981 17,100 11,400 5,700 1987-88 18,241 769 4.216% 2 to 3 18.00 2 to 3 32.00 1982 18,811 12,541 6,270 1988-89 18,626 817 4.386% 3 to 4 26.75 3 to 4 27.20 1983 18,533 12,355 6,178 1989-90 18,827 871 4.626% 4 to 5 20.58 4 to 5 32.20 1984 18,974 12,649 6,325 1990-91 19,510 858 4.398% 5 to 6 (1.58)5 to 6 (1.00)1985 19,778 13,185 6,593 1991-92 19,893 909 4.569% 6 to 7 20.25 6 to 7 33.40 1986 19,951 13,301 6,650 1992-93 21,852 920 4.210% 7 to 8 15.67 7 to 8 27.20 1987 22,803 15,202 7,601 1993-94 21,624 930 4.301% 8 to 9 176.08 8 to 9 174.20 1988 21,034 14,023 7,011 1994-95 24,062 927 3.853% 9 to 10 10.67 9 to 10 28.60 1989 25,576 17,051 8,525 1995-96 26,358 954 3.619% 10 to 11 (20.83)10 to 11 (12.20)1990 26,749 17,833 8,916 1996-97 24,116 963 3.993% 11 to 12 46.25 11 to 12 98.00 1991 22,799 15,199 7,600 1997-98 20,973 978 4.663% total 379.92 total 537.20 1992 20,060 13,373 6,687 1998-99 21,573 854 3.959% 1993 22,330 14,887 7,443 1999-00 22,129 849 3.837% Factor Average Student Change By 1994 22,029 14,686 7,343 2000-01 24,013 912 3.798% 2 Grade Level 1995 25,005 16,670 8,335 2001-02 22,717 846 3.724% 1996 21,573 14,382 7,191 2002-03 21,622 905 4.186% 1997 21,646 14,431 7,215 2003-04 22,023 922 4.186% K 25.50 K 32.60 1998 22,212 14,808 7,404 2004-05 22,075 892 4.041% 1 26.08 1 37.40 1999 22,007 14,671 7,336 2005-06 22,327 955 4.277% 2 24.08 2 33.80 2000 22,487 14,991 7,496 2006-07 22,014 941 4.274% 3 27.17 3 43.40 2001 21,778 14,519 7,259 2007-08 21,835 996 4.562% 4 32.50 4 58.20 2002 21,863 14,575 7,288 2008-09 22,242 998 4.487% 5 17.00 5 39.80 2003 22,431 14,954 7,477 2009-10 22,726 1032 4.541% 6 16.92 6 33.20 2004 22,874 15,249 7,625 2010-11 22,745 1010 4.441% 7 13.83 7 21.60 2005 22,680 15,120 7,560 2011-12 23,723 1029 4.338% 8 3.83 8 33.20 2006 24,244 16,163 8,081 2012-13 24,683 1098 4.448% 9 (10.08)9 11.60 2007 24,902 16,601 8,301 2013-14 25,094 1162 4.631%Last 5 10 (6.92)10 4.40 2008 25,190 16,793 8,397 2014-15 25,101 1232 4.908%year 11 5.58 11 17.00 2009 25,057 16,705 8,352 2015-16 24,695 1198 4.851%Average 12 27.58 12 19.60 2010 24,514 16,343 8,171 2016-17 24,591 1237 5.030%4.897% 2011 24,630 16,420 8,210 2017-18 24,898 1261 Actual 5.065% 2012 25,032 16,688 8,344 2018-19 24,951 1222 <--Prjctd 2013 24,910 16,607 8,303 2019-20 25,202 1234 <--Prjctd 2014 25,348 16,899 8,449 2020-21 25,441 1246 <--Prjctd 2015 25,487 16,991 8,496 2021-22 25,836 1265 <--Prjctd 2016 26,011 17,341 8,670 2022-23 *number from DOH Source: Center for Health Statistics, Washington State Department of Health Factor 2 is the average change in grade level size. 13 YEAR BASE 6 YEAR BASE TABLE 2 Factors Used in Projections 13 YEAR BASE 6 YEAR BASE Factor 1 is the average gain or loss of students as they move from one grade level to the next. Factor 1 uses the past 12 or 6 years of changes. AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT KINDERGARTEN ENROLLMENTS AS A FUNCTION OF KING COUNTY BIRTH RATES AUBURN KINDERGARTEN ENROLLMENT AS A % OF ADJUSTED LIVE BIRTHS AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2017 prj17-18 Page 5 TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS 3.13 Based on 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 KDG 1261 1287 1312 1338 1363 1389 1414 1440 1465 1491 1516 1542 1567 1593 1 1276 1307 1333 1358 1384 1409 1435 1460 1486 1511 1537 1562 1588 1613 2 1252 1298 1329 1355 1380 1406 1431 1457 1482 1508 1533 1559 1584 1610 3 1328 1270 1316 1347 1373 1398 1424 1449 1475 1500 1526 1551 1577 1602 4 1329 1355 1297 1343 1374 1399 1425 1450 1476 1501 1527 1552 1578 1603 5 1269 1350 1375 1317 1363 1394 1420 1445 1471 1496 1522 1547 1573 1598 6 1207 1267 1348 1374 1316 1362 1393 1418 1444 1469 1495 1520 1546 1571 7 1194 1227 1288 1368 1394 1336 1382 1413 1439 1464 1490 1515 1541 1566 8 1183 1210 1243 1303 1384 1410 1352 1398 1429 1454 1480 1505 1531 1556 9 1258 1359 1386 1419 1479 1560 1586 1528 1574 1605 1630 1656 1681 1707 10 1300 1269 1370 1396 1430 1490 1571 1596 1538 1584 1616 1641 1667 1692 11 1249 1279 1248 1349 1376 1409 1469 1550 1576 1518 1564 1595 1620 1646 12 1419 1295 1325 1294 1395 1422 1455 1516 1596 1622 1564 1610 1641 1666 TOTALS 16,525 16,772 17,169 17,561 18,010 18,383 18,755 19,120 19,449 19,723 19,997 20,355 20,692 21,024 Percent of Gain 1.50%2.36%2.28%2.56%2.07%2.02%1.94%1.72%1.41%1.39%1.79%1.66%1.60% Student Gain 247 397 392 449 373 372 364 329 274 274 358 337 332 TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS 3.6 Based on 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 KDG 1261 1294 1326 1359 1391 1424 1457 1489 1522 1554 1587 1620 1652 1685 1 1276 1320 1353 1386 1418 1451 1483 1516 1549 1581 1614 1646 1679 1712 2 1252 1314 1359 1391 1424 1456 1489 1522 1554 1587 1619 1652 1685 1717 3 1328 1284 1346 1391 1423 1456 1488 1521 1554 1586 1619 1651 1684 1717 4 1329 1355 1311 1373 1418 1450 1483 1516 1548 1581 1613 1646 1679 1711 5 1269 1361 1387 1343 1406 1450 1483 1515 1548 1580 1613 1646 1678 1711 6 1207 1268 1360 1386 1342 1405 1449 1482 1514 1547 1579 1612 1645 1677 7 1194 1240 1301 1394 1420 1376 1438 1482 1515 1548 1580 1613 1645 1678 8 1183 1221 1268 1329 1421 1447 1403 1465 1510 1542 1575 1607 1640 1673 9 1258 1357 1395 1442 1503 1595 1621 1577 1639 1684 1716 1749 1782 1814 10 1300 1287 1386 1424 1470 1531 1624 1650 1606 1668 1712 1745 1778 1810 11 1249 1288 1274 1374 1412 1458 1519 1611 1638 1594 1656 1700 1733 1765 12 1419 1347 1386 1372 1472 1510 1556 1617 1709 1736 1692 1754 1798 1831 TOTALS 16,525 16,937 17,453 17,963 18,520 19,009 19,493 19,963 20,405 20,787 21,176 21,641 22,077 22,501 Percent of Gain 2.49%3.05%2.92%3.10%2.64%2.55%2.41%2.21%1.87%1.87%2.20%2.01%1.92% Student Gain 412 516 510 556 490 484 470 442 382 389 465 436 424 GRADE GRADE AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2017 prj17-18 Page 6 TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS 3.13A Based on Birth Rates & 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 K 1261 1222 1234 1246 1265 1 1276 1307 1268 1280 1292 1311 2 1252 1298 1329 1290 1302 1314 1333 3 1328 1270 1316 1347 1308 1320 1332 1351 4 1329 1355 1297 1343 1374 1335 1347 1359 1378 5 1269 1350 1375 1317 1363 1394 1355 1368 1379 1399 6 1207 1267 1348 1374 1316 1362 1393 1354 1366 1378 1397 7 1194 1227 1288 1368 1394 1336 1382 1413 1374 1386 1398 1417 8 1183 1210 1243 1303 1384 1410 1352 1398 1429 1390 1402 1414 1433 9 1258 1359 1386 1419 1479 1560 1586 1528 1574 1605 1566 1578 1590 1609 10 1300 1269 1370 1396 1430 1490 1571 1596 1538 1584 1616 1576 1589 1600 11 1249 1279 1248 1349 1376 1409 1469 1550 1576 1518 1564 1595 1555 1568 12 1419 1295 1325 1294 1395 1422 1455 1516 1596 1622 1564 1610 1641 1602 TOTALS 16,525 16,708 17,027 17,327 17,678 Percent of Gain 1.11%1.91%1.76%2.03% Student Gain 183 319 300 351 TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS 3.6A Based on Birth Rates & 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 KDG 1261 1222 1234 1246 1265 1 1276 1320 1281 1294 1305 1325 2 1252 1314 1359 1319 1332 1343 1363 3 1328 1284 1346 1391 1351 1364 1375 1395 4 1329 1355 1311 1373 1418 1379 1391 1403 1422 5 1269 1361 1387 1343 1406 1450 1411 1423 1435 1454 6 1207 1268 1360 1386 1342 1405 1449 1410 1422 1434 1453 7 1194 1240 1301 1394 1420 1376 1438 1482 1443 1456 1467 1487 8 1183 1221 1268 1329 1421 1447 1403 1465 1510 1470 1483 1494 1514 9 1258 1357 1395 1442 1503 1595 1621 1577 1639 1684 1645 1657 1669 1688 10 1300 1287 1386 1424 1470 1531 1624 1650 1606 1668 1712 1673 1686 1697 11 1249 1288 1274 1374 1412 1458 1519 1611 1638 1594 1656 1700 1661 1673 12 1419 1347 1386 1372 1472 1510 1556 1617 1709 1736 1692 1754 1798 1759 TOTALS 16,525 16,865 17,289 17,687 18,117 Percent of Gain 2.06%2.52%2.30%2.43% Student Gain 340 424 397 430 GRADE GRADE AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2017 prj17-18 Page 7 TABLE 3E.13 K-5 PROJECTIONS - Based on 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 KDG 1261 1287 1312 1338 1363 1389 1414 1440 1465 1491 1516 1542 1567 1593 1 1276 1307 1333 1358 1384 1409 1435 1460 1486 1511 1537 1562 1588 1613 2 1252 1298 1329 1355 1380 1406 1431 1457 1482 1508 1533 1559 1584 1610 3 1328 1270 1316 1347 1373 1398 1424 1449 1475 1500 1526 1551 1577 1602 4 1329 1355 1297 1343 1374 1399 1425 1450 1476 1501 1527 1552 1578 1603 5 1269 1350 1375 1317 1363 1394 1420 1445 1471 1496 1522 1547 1573 1598 6 year 13 year K - 5 TOT 7715 7866 7962 8057 8236 8395 8548 8701 8854 9007 9160 9313 9466 9619 833 1904 Percent of Gain 1.96%1.22%1.20%2.22%1.93%1.82%1.79%1.76%1.73%1.70%1.67%1.64%1.62% Student Gain 151 96 96 179 159 153 153 153 153 153 153 153 153 TABLE 3E.6 K-5 PROJECTIONS - Based on 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 KDG 1261 1294 1326 1359 1391 1424 1457 1489 1522 1554 1587 1620 1652 1685 1 1276 1320 1353 1386 1418 1451 1483 1516 1549 1581 1614 1646 1679 1712 2 1252 1314 1359 1391 1424 1456 1489 1522 1554 1587 1619 1652 1685 1717 3 1328 1284 1346 1391 1423 1456 1488 1521 1554 1586 1619 1651 1684 1717 4 1329 1355 1311 1373 1418 1450 1483 1516 1548 1581 1613 1646 1679 1711 5 1269 1361 1387 1343 1406 1450 1483 1515 1548 1580 1613 1646 1678 1711 6 year 13 year K - 5 TOT 7715 7929 8083 8243 8480 8687 8883 9079 9274 9470 9665 9861 10057 10252 1168 2537 Percent of Gain 2.77%1.94%1.98%2.88%2.45%2.25%2.20%2.15%2.11%2.07%2.02%1.98%1.94% Student Gain 214 154 160 237 207 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 TABLE 3E.13A K-5 PROJECTIONS - Based on Birth Rates and 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 K 1261 1222 1234 1246 1265 1 1276 1307 1268 1280 1292 1311 2 1252 1298 1329 1290 1302 1314 1333 3 1328 1270 1316 1347 1308 1320 1332 1351 4 1329 1355 1297 1343 1374 1335 1347 1359 1378 5 1269 1350 1375 1317 1363 1394 1355 1368 1379 1399 4 year K - 5 TOT 7715 7801 7819 7823 7904 189 Percent of Gain 1.12%0.23%0.05%1.04% Student Gain 86 18 4 81 TABLE 3E.6A K-5 PROJECTIONS - Based on Birth Rates and 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 KDG 1261 1222 1234 1246 1265 1 1276 1320 1281 1294 1305 1325 2 1252 1314 1359 1319 1332 1343 1363 3 1328 1284 1346 1391 1351 1364 1375 1395 4 1329 1355 1311 1373 1418 1379 1391 1403 1422 5 1269 1361 1387 1343 1406 1450 1411 1423 1435 1454 4 year K - 5 TOT 7715 7857 7919 7966 8077 362 Percent of Gain 1.84%0.79%0.60%1.39% Student Gain 142 62 47 111 GRADE GRADE GRADE GRADE AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2017 prj17-18 Page 8 TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3MS.13 Based on 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 6 1207 1267 1348 1374 1316 1362 1393 1418 1444 1469 1495 1520 1546 1571 7 1194 1227 1288 1368 1394 1336 1382 1413 1439 1464 1490 1515 1541 1566 8 1183 1210 1243 1303 1384 1410 1352 1398 1429 1454 1480 1505 1531 1556 6 year 13 year 6 - 8 TOT 3584 3704 3879 4045 4094 4107 4126 4229 4311 4388 4464 4541 4617 4694 542 1110 Percent of Gain 3.36%4.70%4.30%1.19%0.33%0.46%2.49%1.94%1.77%1.74%1.71%1.68%1.66% Student Gain 120 174 167 48 14 19 103 82 77 77 77 77 77 TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3MS.6 Based on 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 6 1207 1268 1360 1386 1342 1405 1449 1482 1514 1547 1579 1612 1645 1677 7 1194 1240 1301 1394 1420 1376 1438 1482 1515 1548 1580 1613 1645 1678 8 1183 1221 1268 1329 1421 1447 1403 1465 1510 1542 1575 1607 1640 1673 6 year 13 year 6 - 8 TOT 3584 3730 3929 4109 4183 4227 4290 4429 4539 4637 4734 4832 4930 5028 706 1444 Percent of Gain 4.06%5.35%4.57%1.81%1.06%1.48%3.24%2.47%2.15%2.11%2.07%2.02%1.98% Student Gain 146 200 179 74 44 63 139 110 98 98 98 98 98 TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3MS.13A Based on Birth Rates & 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 6 1207 1267 1348 1374 1316 1362 1393 1354 1366 1378 1397 7 1194 1227 1288 1368 1394 1336 1382 1413 1374 1386 1398 1417 8 1183 1210 1243 1303 1384 1410 1352 1398 1429 1390 1402 1414 1433 6 year 10 year 6 - 8 TOT 3584 3704 3879 4045 4094 4107 4126 4164 4169 4153 4197 542 613 Percent of Gain 3.36%4.70%4.30%1.19%0.33%0.46%0.92%0.10%(0.36)%1.04% Student Gain 120 174 167 48 14 19 38 4 (15)43 TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3MS.6A Based on Birth Rates & 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 6 1207 1268 1360 1386 1342 1405 1449 1410 1422 1434 1453 7 1194 1240 1301 1394 1420 1376 1438 1482 1443 1456 1467 1487 8 1183 1221 1268 1329 1421 1447 1403 1465 1510 1470 1483 1494 1514 6 year 10 year 6 - 8 TOT 3584 3730 3929 4109 4183 4227 4290 4357 4375 4360 4403 706 819 Percent of Gain 4.06%5.35%4.57%1.81%1.06%1.48%1.57%0.40%(0.35)%0.99% Student Gain 146 200 179 74 44 63 67 18 (15)43 GRADE GRADE GRADE GRADE AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2017 prj17-18 Page 9 TABLE HIGH SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3HS.13 Based on 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 9 1258 1359 1386 1419 1479 1560 1586 1528 1574 1605 1630 1656 1681 1707 10 1300 1269 1370 1396 1430 1490 1571 1596 1538 1584 1616 1641 1667 1692 11 1249 1279 1248 1349 1376 1409 1469 1550 1576 1518 1564 1595 1620 1646 12 1419 1295 1325 1294 1395 1422 1455 1516 1596 1622 1564 1610 1641 1666 6 year 13 year 9-12 TOT 5226 5202 5329 5458 5680 5881 6081 6190 6284 6329 6373 6501 6609 6711 855 1485 Percent of Gain (0.46)%2.43%2.43%4.06%3.54%3.40%1.79%1.52%0.71%0.70%2.01%1.66%1.54% Student Gain (24)127 130 221 201 200 109 94 45 45 128 108 102 TABLE HIGH SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3HS.6 Based on 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 9 1258 1357 1395 1442 1503 1595 1621 1577 1639 1684 1716 1749 1782 1814 10 1300 1287 1386 1424 1470 1531 1624 1650 1606 1668 1712 1745 1778 1810 11 1249 1288 1274 1374 1412 1458 1519 1611 1638 1594 1656 1700 1733 1765 12 1419 1347 1386 1372 1472 1510 1556 1617 1709 1736 1692 1754 1798 1831 6 year 13 year 9-12 TOT 5226 5279 5441 5612 5857 6094 6320 6456 6592 6681 6776 6948 7090 7221 1094 1995 Percent of Gain 1.01%3.08%3.13%4.36%4.06%3.71%2.14%2.12%1.35%1.42%2.54%2.05%1.84% Student Gain 53 163 170 245 238 226 135 137 89 95 172 142 130 TABLE HIGH SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3HS.13A Based on Birth Rates & 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 9 1258 1359 1386 1419 1479 1560 1586 1528 1574 1605 1566 1578 1590 1609 10 1300 1269 1370 1396 1430 1490 1571 1596 1538 1584 1616 1576 1589 1600 11 1249 1279 1248 1349 1376 1409 1469 1550 1576 1518 1564 1595 1555 1568 12 1419 1295 1325 1294 1395 1422 1455 1516 1596 1622 1564 1610 1641 1602 6 year 13 year 9-12 TOT 5226 5202 5329 5458 5680 5881 6081 6190 6284 6329 6308 6359 6375 6379 855 1153 Percent of Gain (0.46)%2.43%2.43%4.06%3.54%3.40%1.79%1.52%0.71%(0.32)%0.80%0.25%0.07% Student Gain (24)127 130 221 201 200 109 94 45 (20)50 16 4 TABLE SR. HIGH PROJECTIONS 3SH.6A Based on Birth Rates & 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 9 1258 1357 1395 1442 1503 1595 1621 1577 1639 1684 1645 1657 1669 1688 10 1300 1287 1386 1424 1470 1531 1624 1650 1606 1668 1712 1673 1686 1697 11 1249 1288 1274 1374 1412 1458 1519 1611 1638 1594 1656 1700 1661 1673 12 1419 1347 1386 1372 1472 1510 1556 1617 1709 1736 1692 1754 1798 1759 6 year 13 year 9-12 TOT 5226 5279 5441 5612 5857 6094 6320 6456 6592 6681 6704 6784 6813 6818 1094 1592 Percent of Gain 1.01%3.08%3.13%4.36%4.06%3.71%2.14%2.12%1.35%0.35%1.19%0.43%0.06% Student Gain 53 163 170 245 238 226 135 137 89 23 80 29 4 GRADE GRADE GRADE GRADE AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2017 prj17-18 Page 10 TABLE PROJECTION COMPARISONS 4 BY GRADE GROUP ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 6 year 13 year E.13 1261 1287 1312 1338 1363 1389 1414 1440 1465 1491 1516 1542 1567 1593 153 332 E.6 1261 1294 1326 1359 1391 1424 1457 1489 1522 1554 1587 1620 1652 1685 196 424 E.13A 1261 1222 1234 1246 1265 E.6A 1261 1222 1234 1246 1265 ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 6 year 13 year E.13 6454 6579 6650 6720 6873 7007 7134 7262 7389 7517 7644 7772 7899 8027 680 1573 E.6 6454 6635 6756 6884 7089 7263 7426 7589 7752 7915 8078 8241 8404 8567 972 2113 E.13A 6454 6579 6585 6577 6639 E.6A 6454 6635 6685 6720 6812 ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 6 year 13 year MS.13 3584 3704 3879 4045 4094 4107 4126 4229 4311 4388 4464 4541 4617 4694 542 1110 MS.6 3584 3730 3929 4109 4183 4227 4290 4429 4539 4637 4734 4832 4930 5028 706 1444 MS.13A 3584 3704 3879 4045 4094 4107 4126 4164 4169 4153 4197 542 MS.6A 3584 3730 3929 4109 4183 4227 4290 4357 4375 4360 4403 706 GRADES ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 9-12 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 6 year 13 year HS.13 5226 5202 5329 5458 5680 5881 6081 6190 6284 6329 6373 6501 6609 6711 855 1485 HS.6 5226 5279 5441 5612 5857 6094 6320 6456 6592 6681 6776 6948 7090 7221 1094 1995 HS.13A 5226 5202 5329 5458 5680 5881 6081 6190 6284 6329 6308 6359 6375 6379 855 1153 HS.6A 5226 5279 5441 5612 5857 6094 6320 6456 6592 6681 6704 6784 6813 6818 1094 1592 DISTRICT TOTALS ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 6 year 13 year 3.13 16,525 16,772 17,169 17,561 18,010 18,383 18,755 19,120 19,449 19,723 19,997 20,355 20,692 21,024 2230 4499 3.6 16,525 16,937 17,453 17,963 18,520 19,009 19,493 19,963 20,405 20,787 21,176 21,641 22,077 22,501 2968 5976 3.13A 16,525 16,708 17,027 17,327 17,678 3.6A 16,525 16,865 17,289 17,687 18,117 K-12 KNDG GRADES 1-5 GRADES 6-8 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2017 prj17-18 Page 11 TABLE 5 Total =October 1 Actual Count AND Projected Counts Prj 3.13 -13 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase Diff =Number Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase % =Percent Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Prj 3.6A - 6 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Grades 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 K - 5 Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff % ACTUAL 5774 xxx xxx 5735 xxx xxx 5887 xxx xxx 6033 xxx xxx 6159 xxx xxx Prj 3E.13 5655 (119)(2.06)%5761 26 0.45%5750 (137)(2.33)%5871 (162)(2.69)%6085 (74)(1.20)% Prj 3E.6 5662 (112)(1.94)%5821 86 1.50%5795 (92)(1.56)%5921 (112)(1.86)%6138 (21)(0.34)% Prj 3E.13A 5605 (169)(2.93)%5709 (26)(0.45)%5750 (137)(2.33)%5869 (164)(2.72)%6059 (100)(1.62)% Prj 3E.6A 5631 (143)(2.48)%5756 21 0.37%5784 (103)(1.75)%5912 (121)(2.01)%6094 (65)(1.06)% Grades 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 6 - 8 Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff % ACTUAL 3169 xxx xxx 3144 xxx xxx 3097 xxx xxx 3206 xxx xxx 3196 xxx xxx Prj 3MS.13 3185 (80)0.50%3214 70 2.23%3295 198 6.39%3131 (75)(2.34)%3107 (89)(2.78)% Prj 3MS.6 3192 (75)0.73%3216 72 2.29%3311 214 6.91%3146 (60)(1.87)%3116 (80)(2.50)% Prj 3MS.13A 3185 (80)0.50%3214 70 2.23%3295 198 6.39%3131 (75)(2.34)%3107 (89)(2.78)% Prj 3MS.6A 3192 (75)0.73%3216 72 2.29%3311 214 6.91%3146 (60)(1.87)%3116 (80)(2.50)% Grades 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 9 - 12 Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff % ACTUAL 5032 xxx xxx 5241 xxx xxx 5320 xxx xxx 5299 xxx xxx 5234 xxx xxx Prj 3SH.13 4577 (455)(9.04)%4630 (611)(11.66)%4783 (537)(10.09)%5085 (214)(4.04)%5190 (44)(0.84)% Prj 3SH.6 4594 (438)(8.70)%4639 (602)(11.49)%4769 (551)(10.36)%5086 (213)(4.02)%5192 (42)(0.80)% Prj 3SH.13A 4577 (455)(9.04)%4630 (611)(11.66)%4783 (537)(10.09)%5085 (214)(4.04)%5190 (44)(0.84)% Prj 3SH.6A 4594 (438)(8.70)%4639 (602)(11.49)%4769 (551)(10.36)%5086 (213)(4.02)%5192 (42)(0.80)% All 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 Grades Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff % ACTUAL 13,975 xxx xxx 14,120 xxx xxx 14,304 xxx xxx 14,538 xxx xxx 14,589 xxx xxx Prj 3.13 13,417 (558)(3.99)%13,605 (515)(3.65)%13,828 (476)(3.33)%14,087 (451)(3.10)%14,382 (207)(1.42)% Prj 3.6 13,448 (527)(3.77)%13,676 (444)(3.14)%13,875 (429)(3.00)%14,153 (385)(2.65)%14,446 (143)(0.98)% Prj 3.13A 13,367 (608)(4.35)%13,553 (567)(4.02)%13,828 (476)(3.33)%14,085 (453)(3.12)%14,356 (233)(1.60)% Prj 3.6A 13,417 (558)(3.99)%13,611 (509)(3.60)%13,864 (440)(3.08)%14,144 (394)(2.71)%14,402 (187)(1.28)% PROJECTION COMPARISONS BY GRADE GROUP AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2017 prj17-18 Page 12 TABLE 5 Total =October 1 Actual Count AND Projected Counts Prj 3.13 -13 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase Diff =Number Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase % =Percent Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Prj 3.6A - 6 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Grades 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 K - 5 Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff % ACTUAL 6208 xxx xxx 6230 xxx xxx 6489 xxx xxx 6805 xxx xxx 7061 xxx xxx Prj 3E.13 6179 (29)(0.47)%6254 24 0.39%6282 (207)(3.19)%6275 (530)(7.79)%6372 (689)(9.76)% Prj 3E.6 6237 29 0.47%6294 64 1.03%6323 (166)(2.56)%6267 (538)(7.91)%6368 (693)(9.81)% Prj 3E.13A 6129 (79)(1.27)%6237 7 0.11%6252 (237)(3.65)%6266 (539)(7.92)%6346 (715)(10.13)% Prj 3E.6A 6172 (36)(0.58)%6264 34 0.55%6269 (220)(3.39)%6260 (545)(8.01)%6339 (722)(10.23)% Grades 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 6 - 8 Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff % ACTUAL 3213 xxx xxx 3141 xxx xxx 3144 xxx xxx 3264 xxx xxx 3238 xxx xxx Prj 3MS.13 3179 (34)(1.06)%3242 101 3.22%3234 90 2.86%3221 (43)(1.32)%3143 (95)(2.93)% Prj 3MS.6 3195 (18)(0.56)%3243 102 3.25%3236 92 2.93%3211 (53)(1.62)%3132 (106)(3.27)% Prj 3MS.13A 3179 (34)(1.06)%3242 101 3.22%3234 90 2.86%3221 (43)(1.32)%3143 (95)(2.93)% Prj 3MS.6A 3195 (18)(0.56)%3243 102 3.25%3236 92 2.93%3211 (53)(1.62)%3132 (106)(3.27)% Grades 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 9 - 12 Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff % ACTUAL 5061 xxx xxx 4992 xxx xxx 4963 xxx xxx 4902 xxx xxx 4978 xxx xxx Prj 3SH.13 5129 68 1.34%5074 82 1.64%4921 (42)(0.85)%4901 (1)(0.02)%4813 (165)(3.31)% Prj 3SH.6 5155 94 1.86%5128 136 2.72%5027 64 1.29%5017 115 2.35%4906 (72)(1.45)% Prj 3SH.13A 5129 68 1.34%5074 82 1.64%4921 (42)(0.85)%4901 (1)(0.02)%4813 (165)(3.31)% Prj 3SH.6A 5155 94 1.86%5129 137 2.74%5027 64 1.29%5017 115 2.35%4906 (72)(1.45)% All 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 Grades Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff % ACTUAL 14,482 xxx xxx 13,672 xxx xxx 14,596 xxx xxx 14,971 xxx xxx 15,277 xxx xxx Prj 3.13 13,499 (173)(6.79)%14,570 898 6.57%14,437 (159)(1.09)%14,397 (574)(3.83)%14,328 (949)(6.21)% Prj 3.6 13,542 (130)(6.49)%14,665 993 7.26%14,586 (10)(0.07)%14,495 (476)(3.18)%14,406 (871)(5.70)% Prj 3.13A 13,447 (225)(7.15)%14,553 881 6.44%14,407 (189)(1.29)%14,388 (583)(3.89)%14,302 (975)(6.38)% Prj 3.6A 13,510 (162)(6.71)%14,636 964 7.05%14,532 (64)(0.44)%14,488 (483)(3.23)%14,377 (900)(5.89)% BY GRADE GROUP (Continued) PROJECTION COMPARISONS AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2017 prj17-18 Page 13 TABLE 5 Total =October 1 Actual Count AND Projected Counts Prj 3.13 -13 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase Diff =Number Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase % =Percent Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Prj 3.6A - 6 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Grades 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Average Average Historical Data is grouped by K - 5 Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Diff %K - 5, 6-8, 9-12 articulation ACTUAL 7340 xxx xxx 7500 xxx xxx 7715 xxx xxx xxx xxx pattern. Prj 3E.13 6659 (681)(9.28)%7052 (448)(5.97)%7329 (386)-5.00%(255)(3.76)% Prj 3E.6 6632 (708)(9.65)%7046 (454)(6.05)%7317 (398)-5.16%(232)(3.37)%Articulation pattern has no Prj 3E.13A 6643 (697)(9.50)%6979 (521)(6.95)%7194 (521)-6.75%(292)(4.32)%numeric impact on efficacy Prj 3E.6A 6611 (729)(9.93)%6966 (534)(7.12)%7169 (546)-7.08%(278)(4.05)%of projection models. Grades 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Average Average 6 - 8 Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Diff % ACTUAL 3351 xxx xxx 3392 xxx xxx 3584 xxx xxx xxx xxx Prj 3MS.13 3230 (121)(3.61)%3256 (136)(4.01)%3307 (277)-7.73%(38)(0.81)% Prj 3MS.6 3213 (138)(4.12)%3246 (146)(4.30)%3287 (297)-8.29%(38)(0.80)% Prj 3MS.13A 3230 (121)(3.61)%3256 (136)(4.01)%3307 (277)-7.73%(38)(0.81)% Prj 3MS.6A 3213 (138)(4.12)%3246 (146)(4.30)%3287 (297)-8.29%(38)(0.80)% Grades 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Average Average 9 - 12 Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Diff % ACTUAL 4972 xxx xxx 5053 xxx xxx 5226 xxx xxx xxx xxx Prj 3SH.13 4773 (199)(4.00)%4874 (179)(3.54)%4896 (330)-6.31%(202)(3.90)% Prj 3SH.6 4856 (116)(2.33)%4956 (97)(1.92)%4959 (267)-5.11%(153)(2.92)% Prj 3SH.13A 4773 (199)(4.00)%4874 (179)(3.54)%4896 (330)-6.31%(202)(3.90)% Prj 3SH.6A 4856 (116)(2.33)%4956 (97)(1.92)%4959 (267)-5.11%(153)(2.92)% All 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Average Average Grades Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Diff % ACTUAL 15,663 xxx xxx 15,945 xxx xxx 16525 xxx xxx xxx xxx Prj 3.13 14,662 (1,001)(6.39)%15,182 (763)(4.79)%15531 (994)-6.02%(456)(3.39)% Prj 3.6 14,701 (962)(6.14)%15,248 (697)(4.37)%15563 (962)-5.82%(388)(2.93)% Prj 3.13A 14,646 (1,017)(6.49)%15,109 (836)(5.24)%15396 (1129)-6.83%(493)(3.63)% Prj 3.6A 14,680 (983)(6.28)%15,168 (777)(4.87)%15415 (1110)-6.72%(431)(3.21)% PROJECTION COMPARISONS BY GRADE GROUP (Continued) Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-April 2018 46 BASE DATA - BUILDOUT SCHEDULE Student Generation Factors ASSUMPTIONS:Single Multi- 1 Uses Build Out estimates received from developers. 2018 SF 2018 MF Family Family 2 Student Generation Factors are updated Auburn data for 2018 as allowed per King County Ordinance Elementary 0.2340 0.2190 3 Takes area labeled Lakeland and Kersey Projects projects across 2018-2024 Middle School 0.0970 0.1070 4 Takes area labeled Bridges and other Lea Hill area developments and projects across 2018-2024 Senior High 0.1230 0.1060 5 Includes known developments in N. Auburn and other non-Lea Hill and non-Lakeland developments Total 0.4540 0.4320 Table Auburn S.D. 1 Development 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total Lakeland/Kersey Single Family 50 150 100 23 0 0 323 Lea Hill Area Single Family 75 60 30 22 0 0 0 187 Other Single Family Units 40 100 170 180 170 120 100 880 Total Single Family Units 165 310 300 225 170 120 100 1390 Projected Pupils: K-5 39 73 70 53 40 28 23 325 6-8 16 30 29 22 16 12 10 135 9-12 20 38 37 28 21 15 12 171 K-12 75 141 136 102 77 54 45 631 Multi Family Units 200 120 35 8 0 0 0 363 Total Multi Family Units 200 120 35 8 0 0 0 363 Projected Pupils: K-5 44 26 8 2 0 0 0 79 6-8 21 13 4 1 0 0 0 39 9-12 21 13 4 1 0 0 0 38 K-12 86 52 15 3 0 0 0 157 Total Housing Units 365 430 335 233 170 120 100 1753 K-5 82 99 78 54 40 28 23 405 6-8 37 43 33 23 16 12 10 174 9-12 41 51 41 29 21 15 12 209 K-12 161 193 151 106 77 54 45 788 Cumulative Projection 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 82 181 259 313 353 381 405 37 80 113 136 152 164 174 41 92 133 161 182 197 209 161 354 505 611 688 742 788 Total Total Sr. High Pupils Elementary - Grades K -5 Mid School - Grades 6 - 8 Senior High - Grades 9 - 12 Total Auburn Factors Elementary Pupils Mid School Pupils Sr. High Pupils Elementary Pupils Total Mid School Pupils Sr. High Pupils Elementary Pupils Mid School Pupils Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-April 2018 47 TABLE New Projects - Annual New Pupils Added & Distributed 2 by Grade Level 6 Year Percent of average GRADE Average Pupils by Grade 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2024-25 2025-26 Enroll.& Level KDG 1199 7.74%1261 12 27 39 47 53 57 61 1 1210 7.81%1276 13 28 39 48 54 58 62 2 1207 7.79%46.15%1252 13 28 39 48 54 58 61 3 1208 7.80%1328 13 28 39 48 54 58 61 4 1176 7.59%1329 12 27 38 46 52 56 60 5 1151 7.43%1269 12 26 38 45 51 55 59 6 1109 7.15%1207 12 25 36 44 49 53 56 7 1112 7.18%21.48%1194 12 25 36 44 49 53 57 8 1108 7.15%1183 12 25 36 44 49 53 56 9 1230 7.94%1258 13 28 40 48 55 59 63 10 1257 8.11%32.37%1300 13 29 41 50 56 60 64 11 1225 7.90%1249 13 28 40 48 54 59 62 12 1304 8.41%1419 14 30 43 51 58 62 66 Totals 15496 100.00%Total 16525 161 354 505 611 688 742 788 TABLE 6 year Historical Data 3 Average Enrollment and Percentage Distributed by Grade Level Grade 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 6yr Ave % KDG 1098 1170 1232 1198 1237 1261 1199.33 7.74% 1 1089 1188 1219 1279 1210 1276 1210.17 7.81% 2 1083 1124 1196 1289 1300 1252 1207.33 7.79% 3 1111 1125 1136 1232 1317 1328 1208.17 7.80% 4 1038 1123 1156 1170 1237 1329 1175.50 7.59% 5 1070 1075 1122 1172 1199 1269 1151.17 7.43% 6 1041 1076 1059 1116 1152 1207 1108.50 7.15% 7 1086 1072 1091 1099 1132 1194 1112.33 7.18% 8 1017 1116 1088 1136 1108 1183 1108.00 7.15% 9 1200 1159 1275 1229 1261 1258 1230.33 7.94% 10 1278 1229 1169 1316 1248 1300 1256.67 8.11% 11 1164 1240 1211 1167 1318 1249 1224.83 7.90% 12 1321 1274 1323 1260 1226 1419 1303.83 8.41% Totals 14596 14971 15277 15663 15945 16525 15496.17 100.00% % of change 2.57%2.04%2.53%1.80%3.64% change +/- 375 306 386 282 580 Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-April 2018 48 TABLE 4 New Projects - Pupil Projection Cumulative ND 3.13 by Grade Level Updated April 2018 Uses a 'cohort survival'GRADE 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2024-25 2025-26 model assuming 100% of Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected previous year new KDG 1261 1299 1339 1377 1410 1442 1471 1501 enrollees move to the next 1 1276 1320 1361 1397 1432 1463 1493 1522 grade level.2 1252 1311 1357 1394 1428 1460 1489 1518 3 1328 1283 1344 1386 1421 1452 1482 1510 Kindergarten calculates 4 1329 1367 1324 1381 1420 1451 1481 1510 previous years number plus 5 1269 1362 1401 1355 1408 1445 1475 1504 K-5 7715 7941 8125 8291 8519 8713 8892 9065 Current generation based on 6 1207 1279 1373 1410 1360 1411 1446 1474 % of total enrollment. Other 7 1194 1239 1313 1404 1438 1385 1435 1470 factor uses 100% cohort 8 1183 1222 1268 1339 1428 1459 1405 1454 survival, based on 6 year GR 6-8 3584 3739 3955 4154 4225 4256 4286 4398 history.9 1258 1372 1414 1459 1527 1615 1645 1591 10 1300 1282 1399 1437 1480 1546 1631 1660 11 1249 13 28 40 48 54 59 62 12 1419 1293 1278 1392 1427 1467 1531 1616 GR 9-12 5226 3959 4119 4328 4483 4682 4866 4929 Total 16525 15639 16199 16772 17227 17650 18044 18392 % of change -5.36%3.58%3.54%2.71%2.46%2.24%1.93% change +/- -886 560 573 455 423 394 347 TABLE 5 New Projects - Pupil Projection Cumulative ND 3.6 by Grade Level Updated April 2018 Uses a 'cohort survival'GRADE 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2024-25 2025-26 2022-23 2023-24 model assuming 100% of Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected previous year new KDG 1261 1306 1353 1398 1438 1477 1514 1550 1568 1585 enrollees move to the next 1 1276 1333 1381 1425 1466 1505 1541 1578 1595 1614 grade level.2 1252 1327 1387 1430 1472 1510 1547 1583 1601 1620 3 1328 1297 1374 1430 1471 1510 1546 1582 1600 1619 Kindergarten calculates 4 1329 1367 1338 1411 1464 1502 1539 1576 1594 1612 previous years number plus 5 1269 1373 1413 1381 1451 1501 1538 1574 1591 1609 K-5 7715 8002 8245 8476 8762 9005 9226 9443 9550 9658 Current generation based on 6 1207 1280 1385 1422 1386 1454 1502 1538 1556 1573 % of total enrollment. Other 7 1194 1252 1326 1430 1464 1425 1491 1539 1556 1574 factor uses 100% cohort 8 1183 1233 1293 1365 1465 1496 1456 1521 1539 1556 survival, based on 6 year GR 6-8 3584 3764 4005 4218 4314 4376 4449 4598 4650 4703 history.9 1258 1370 1423 1482 1551 1650 1680 1640 1658 1677 10 1300 1300 1415 1465 1520 1587 1684 1714 1733 1753 11 1249 1301 1302 1414 1460 1512 1578 1673 1692 1711 12 1419 1361 1416 1415 1523 1568 1618 1683 1702 1722 GR 9-12 5226 5331 5556 5776 6055 6317 6560 6710 6786 6863 Total 16525 17097 17806 18469 19131 19697 20235 20751 20986 21225 % of change 3.46%4.14%3.73%3.58%2.96%2.73%2.55%1.14%1.14% change +/- 572 709 663 662 566 538 515 236 238 Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-April 2018 49 TABLE 6 New Developments - Pupil Projection Cumulative 3.31%1.14% ND3.13A by Grade Level Updated April 2018 Uses a 'cohort survival'GRADE 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2024-25 2025-26 model assuming 100% of Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected previous year new KDG 1261 1234 1261 1285 1312 enrollees move to the next 1 1276 1320 1296 1319 1340 1365 grade level.2 1252 1311 1357 1329 1350 1368 1391 3 1328 1283 1344 1386 1356 1374 1390 1412 Kindergarten calculates 4 1329 1367 1324 1381 1420 1387 1403 1419 birth rate average plus 5 1269 1362 1401 1355 1408 1445 1410 1427 7715 7876 7982 8056 8186 6938 5594 4258 Current generation based on 6 1207 1279 1373 1410 1360 1411 1446 1410 % of total enrollment. Other 7 1194 1239 1313 1404 1438 1385 1435 1470 factor uses 100% cohort 8 1183 1222 1268 1339 1428 1459 1405 1454 survival, based on 6 year 3584 3739 3955 4154 4225 4256 4286 4334 history.9 1258 1372 1414 1459 1527 1615 1645 1591 10 1300 1282 1399 1437 1480 1546 1631 1660 11 1249 1292 1276 1389 1424 1463 1528 1612 12 1419 1309 1355 1337 1446 1480 1517 1582 5226 5254 5444 5622 5878 6104 6321 6445 Total 16525 16869 17381 17831 18289 % of change 2.08%3.03%2.59%2.57% change +/- 344 512 450 458 TABLE 7 New Projects - Pupil Projection Cumulative ND 3.6A by Grade Level Updated April 2018 Uses a 'cohort survival'GRADE 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2024-25 2025-26 model assuming 100% of Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected previous year new KDG 1261 1234 1261 1285 1312 enrollees move to the next 1 1276 1333 1309 1333 1353 1379 grade level.2 1252 1327 1387 1358 1380 1397 1421 3 1328 1297 1374 1430 1399 1418 1433 1456 Kindergarten calculates 4 1329 1367 1338 1411 1464 1431 1447 1463 birth rate average plus 5 1269 1373 1413 1381 1451 1501 1466 1482 7715 7930 8081 8199 8359 Current generation based on 6 1207 1280 1385 1422 1386 1454 1502 1466 % of total enrollment. Other 7 1194 1252 1326 1430 1464 1425 1491 1539 factor uses 100% cohort 8 1183 1233 1293 1365 1465 1496 1456 1521 survival, based on 6 year 3584 3764 4005 4218 4314 4376 4449 4526 history.9 1258 1370 1423 1482 1551 1650 1680 1640 10 1300 1300 1415 1465 1520 1587 1684 1714 11 1249 1301 1302 1414 1460 1512 1578 1673 12 1419 1361 1416 1415 1523 1568 1618 1683 5226 5331 5556 5776 6055 6317 6560 6710 Total 16525 17025 17642 18192 18728 % of change 3.03%3.62%3.12%2.94% change +/- 500 617 550 536 Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey Auburn School District Development Growth since 1/1/13 April 2018 (Based on November 1, 2017 Enrollment) 51 SINGLE FAMILY Elem Middle HS Total Elem Middle HS Total Alicia Glenn 2016 28 28 0 Arthur Jacobsen 9 3 9 21 0.321 0.107 0.321 0.750 Anthem (formerly Megan's Meadows)2018 13 9 0 Ilalko 6 1 1 8 0.667 0.111 0.111 0.889 Bridges 386 291 95 Lea Hill 57 23 31 111 0.366 0.268 0.347 0.981 Canyon Creek 154 152 2 Evergreen Hts.25 3 8 36 0.164 0.020 0.053 0.237 Kendall Ridge 2015 104 104 0 Arthur Jacobsen 23 11 13 47 0.221 0.106 0.125 0.452 Lakeland East: Portola 2015 130 130 0 Ilalko 45 21 33 99 0.346 0.162 0.254 0.762 Lakeland: Edgeview 2015 368 368 0 Gildo Rey 63 29 28 120 0.171 0.079 0.076 0.326 Lakeland Hills Estates 2017 66 66 0 Gildo Rey 18 8 14 40 0.273 0.121 0.212 0.606 Lakeland: Pinnacle Estates 99 76 23 Lakeland Hills 49 18 18 85 0.645 0.237 0.237 1.118 Lakeland: Villas at…2015 81 81 0 Ilalko 26 8 7 41 0.321 0.099 0.086 0.506 Monterey Park 2016 235 235 0 Evergreen Hts.42 21 32 95 0.179 0.089 0.136 0.404 Mountain View 2018 55 55 0 Evergreen Hts.9 2 3 14 0.164 0.036 0.055 0.255 Sonata Hills 2017 71 71 0 Lea Hill 9 5 5 19 0.127 0.070 0.070 0.268 Spencer Place 13 5 8 Arthur Jacobsen 8 6 0 14 1.600 1.200 0.000 2.800 Sterling Court 2013 8 8 0 Hazelwood 2 2 2 6 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.750 Vintage Place 2014 26 26 0 Lea Hill 8 4 6 18 0.308 0.154 0.231 0.692 Totals 1837 1705 128 399 165 210 774 0.234 0.097 0.123 0.454 Student Generation FactorsFeeder Elementary Units/ Parcels Current Occupancy To Be Occupied Actual StudentsYear of Full OccupancyDevelopment Name Auburn School District Development Growth since 1/1/13 April 2018 (Based on November 1, 2017 Enrollment) 52 SINGLE FAMILY--2018 and beyond Middle HS Total Anderson Acres 14 0 14 1 2 6 Backbone Ridge 7 0 7 1 1 3 Bridle Estates 18 0 18 2 2 8 Hastings 10 *10 0 10 1 1 5 Hazel Heights 22 0 22 2 3 10 Hazel View 20 0 20 2 2 9 Lakeland: Forest Glen At ..30 0 30 3 4 14 Lakeland: Park Ridge 256 0 256 25 32 116 Lakeland: River Rock*14 0 14 1 2 6 Pacific Lane 11 0 11 1 1 5 Ridge At Tall Timbers 104 0 104 10 13 47 Willow Place*18 0 18 2 2 8 Yates Plat*16 0 16 2 2 7 Auburn Gateway 500 0 500 48 62 227 Dulcinea 6 0 6 1 1 3 Richardson BLA/Plat 6 0 6 1 1 3 Vasiliy 8 0 8 1 1 4 Wesport Capital 306 0 306 30 38 139 1366 1366 Totals 132 168 620 * currently under construction Estimated Students Based on Student Generation FactorsUnits/ Parcels Current OccupancyDevelopment Name To Be Occupied Elem 3 2 4 2 5 5 7 60 3 3 24 4 4 320 117 72 1 1 2 Auburn School District Development Growth since 1/1/13 April 2018 (Based on November 1, 2017 Enrollment) 53 MULTI FAMILY Elem Middle HS Total Elem Middle HS Total Lakeland: Four Lakes Apts 2014 234 234 0 Ilalko 15 11 16 42 0.064 0.047 0.068 0.179 Promenade Apts * (formerly Auburn Hills)294 211 109 Lea Hill 75 29 23 127 0.355 0.137 0.109 0.602 Trail Run Townhomes 2014 115 115 0 Evergreen Hts.15 5 6 26 0.130 0.043 0.052 0.226 The Villas at Auburn *295 74 206 Washington 34 23 22 79 0.680 0.460 0.440 1.580 Totals 938 634 315 139 68 67 274 0.219 0.107 0.106 0.432 2018 and beyond Sundallen Condos 48 0 48 11 5 5 21 Total 11 5 5 21 Estimated Students Based on Student Generation Factors Student Generation FactorsUnits/ Parcels Current Occupancy Units/ Parcels Current Occupancy To Be Occupied * Current May 2018 Enrollment used for these two complexes. Development Name To Be Occupied Actual Students Feeder Elementary Year of Full Occupancy This page intentionally left blank. HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 401 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018-2023 Board Introduction: June 27, 2018 Adoption: July 18, 2018 HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 401 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018-2023 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Joe Van, President Bernie Dorsey, Vice President Angelica Alvarez Fa’izah Bradford Tyrone Curry, Sr. SUPERINTENDENT Dr. Susan Enfield Table of Contents Page Introduction ......................................................................................................................................1 Educational Program Standard ........................................................................................................3 Capital Facilities Inventory ..............................................................................................................5 Student Enrollment Trends and Projections ....................................................................................9 Capital Facilities Projections for Future Needs .............................................................................10 Financing Plan ...............................................................................................................................12 School Impact Fees ........................................................................................................................13 Appendix A: District Map .......................................................................................................... A-1 Appendix B: Population and Enrollment Data ............................................................................B-1 Appendix C: School Impact Fee Calculations .............................................................................C-1 Appendix D: Student Generation Rates ...................................................................................... D-1 For information regarding the Highline School District’s 2018-2023 Capital Facilities Plan, contact Rodney Sheffer, Interim Executive Director, Capital Planning and Construction, Highline School District No. 401, 17810 8th Avenue South, Building A, Burien, Washington 98148. Telephone: (206) 631-7500 - 1 - Purpose of the Capital Facilities Plan This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan has been prepared by the Highline School District (the “District”) as the District’s primary facility planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington’s Growth Management Act (the “GMA”) and King County Council Code Title 21A. The Plan was prepared using data available in May 2018. The GMA outlines 13 broad goals including adequate provision of necessary public facilities and services. Schools are among these necessary facilities and services. School districts have adopted capital facilities plans to satisfy the requirements of RCW 36.70A.070 and to identify additional school facilities necessary to meet the educational needs of the growing student populations anticipated in their districts. The Highline School District (the “District”) has prepared this Capital Facilities Plan (the “CFP”) to provide King County (the “County”) and the cities of Burien, Des Moines, Kent, Normandy Park, SeaTac, and Tukwila with a schedule and financing program for capital improvements over the next six years (2018-2023). This Plan will be updated annually with any changes to the impact fee schedule adjusted accordingly. Executive Summary After a period of low enrollment growth, the District has experienced steady enrollment increases since 2010 and projects continued enrollment increases following a slight dip in 2017. The District currently serves an approximate student population of 18,983 (October 1, 2017 enrollment) with 18 elementary schools (grades K-6), five middle level schools (grades 7-8), and five high schools (grades 9-12). In addition, the District has alternative programs: Big Picture (MS and HS) at the Manhattan site; CHOICE Academy (MS and HS) at the Woodside site; New Start (9-12) at the Salmon Creek Site; and Puget Sound Skills Center (“PSSC”). Over the last 14 years the District has embarked on a major capital improvement effort to enhance its facilities to meet current educational and life-safety standards. Since 2002 the District has passed three major capital bonds: one in 2002 for approximately $189,000,000, one in 2006 for approximately $148,000,000, and one in 2016 for approximately $299,850,000. The 2002 and 2006 bonds were used for replacement of existing facilities and not to accommodate increased enrollment. The 2016 bonds are earmarked for a combination of improvements to/replacement of existing facilities and the provision of new capacity. With the approved capital bond funds and reimbursements from the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, the State of Washington, the Port of Seattle, the Federal Aviation Administration and private donations for a new Raisbeck Aviation High School, the District has designed, permitted and constructed 13 new elementary schools, 1 new high school, renovated 3 SECTION ONE: INTRODUCTION - 2 - schools as interim facilities, and renovated portions of Memorial Field and Camp Waskowitz. All of this work has been done since March 2002. The District’s 2016 bond proposal was based on the recommendations of a Capital Facilities Advisory Committee (“CFAC”), a citizens’ committee representing every part the District. The committee met for a year to study the District's facilities needs, review data, such as enrollment projections and building conditions, and analyze various solutions. CFAC developed a long- term facilities plan, which includes the 2016 bond as the first phase of a four-phase plan to meet students’ needs over the next 20 years. As the District looks ahead it recognizes that anticipated enrollment growth, some of which will be caused by new development, and implementation of recent legislation will require the District either to add new facilities, add additions to existing facilities, renovate existing facilities, or add portables to existing facilities. This CFP identifies the current enrollment, the current capacity of each educational facility, the projected enrollment over the six-year planning period and how the District plans to accommodate this growth. It also includes a schedule of impact fees that should be charged to new development. Based on current projections, the District needs to add capacity at the elementary and middle school levels to accommodate projected enrollment and implementation of recent legislation. To address these needs, the District plans to build a new elementary to replace Des Moines Elementary School to increase its student capacity, add classrooms at existing elementary schools, and build one new middle school. In addition, new modular or portables may need to be added at individual elementary schools and middle schools to accommodate future enrollment. At this time it has been assumed that additional land will not be needed to accommodate the new schools; however, land will be necessary in the future to support the District’s long range facilities plan and the Educational Strategic Plan. - 3 - King County Code 21A.06 refers to a “Standard of Service” that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. School facility and student capacity needs are dictated by the types and amounts of space required to accommodate the District’s adopted educational program. The educational program standards which typically drive facility space needs include grade configuration, optimum facility size, class size, educational program offerings, classroom utilization and scheduling requirements, and use of relocatable classrooms (portables). District educational program standards may change in the future as a result of changes in the education program, special programs class sizes, grade span configurations, and use of new technology, as well as other physical aspects of the school facilities. In addition, the State Legislature’s implementation of requirements for reduced K-3 class size will also impact school capacity and educational program standards. (The District currently offers full-day kindergarten.) The school capacity inventory will be reviewed periodically and adjusted for any changes to the educational program standards. These changes will also be reflected in future updates of this CFP. The Standard of Service outlined below reflects only those programs and educational opportunities provided to students that directly affect the capacity of school buildings. The special programs listed below require classroom space, thus the permanent capacity of some buildings housing these programs has been reduced. Table 1 Class Size – Standard of Service Grade Level Average Class Size Based on Standard of Service Kindergarten 24* Grades 1 – 3 25* Grades 4 – 6 27 Grades 7 – 8 30 Grades 9 – 12 32 *The District standard for K-3 will change to 17:1 in 2019 (see Table 7). It is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of all regular teaching stations throughout the day. Therefore, classroom capacity is adjusted using a utilization factor of available teaching stations depending on the physical characteristics of the facility and educational program needs. SECTION 2 – STANDARD OF SERVICE - 4 - Elementary School Standard of Service Models • Special education for students with disabilities may be provided in self- contained classrooms. • All students are provided music instruction in a separate classroom. • All students will have scheduled time in a special classroom. • Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms designated as follows: • Resource Rooms • English Language Learners (ELL) • Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) • Gifted Education • Learning Assisted Programs • Severely Behavior Disorder • Transition Rooms • Mild, Moderate, and Severe Disabilities • Developmental Kindergarten • Extended Daycare Programs and Preschool Programs Secondary School Standard of Service Models • Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms designated as follows: • Resource Rooms • English Language Learners (ELL) • Computer Labs • Science Labs • Career and Vocational Rooms • Daycare Programs • Alternative Program Spaces -5- This section provides an inventory of capital facilities owned and operated by the District including schools and relocatable classrooms (modulars or portables). School facility capacity was inventoried based on the space required to accommodate the District’s adopted educational program standards. See Section Two: Standard of Service. A map showing locations of District facilities is provided in Appendix A. Schools See Section One for a description of the District’s schools and programs. School capacity was determined based on the number of teaching stations (or general classrooms) within each building and the space requirements of the District’s currently adopted current educational program and internal targets as reported in ICOS with the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction. It is this capacity calculation that is used to establish the District’s baseline capacity, and to determine future capacity needs based on projected student enrollment. The school capacity inventory is summarized in Tables 2, 3, and 4. As the District implements reduced K-3 class size requirements and grade reconfiguration, the inventory will reflect adjustments in the Standard of Service (see Tables 7-B and 7-C). Relocatable Classrooms (Portables) Relocatable classrooms (portables) are used as interim classroom space to house students until funding can be secured to construct permanent classrooms. The District currently uses 27 relocatable classrooms at various school sites throughout the District to provide additional interim general classroom capacity. A typical relocatable classroom can provide capacity for a full-size class of students. Current use of relocatable classrooms throughout the District is summarized in Table 5. SECTION THREE: CAPITAL FACILITIES INVENTORY -6- Table 2 Elementary School Level Inventory Elementary School Building Area (sq. ft.) Teaching Stations* Permanent Capacity** Beverly Park at Glendale ES 58,145 22 514 Bow Lake ES 76,108 30 666 Cedarhurst ES 68,916 26 619 Des Moines ES 41,766 19 471 Gregory Heights ES 65,978 27 585 Hazel Valley ES 65,346 26 452 Hilltop ES 51,532 24 594 Madrona ES 69,240 25 598 Marvista ES 68,462 27 621 McMicken Heights ES 69,979 25 582 Midway ES 66,096 25 610 Mount View ES 67,783 26 628 North Hill ES 65,665 27 636 Parkside ES 68,857 26 622 Seahurst ES 59,967 27 585 Shorewood ES 60,326 22 483 Southern Heights ES 32,942 15 336 White Center ES 65,654 26 622 TOTAL 1,122,762 445 10,231 * Teaching Station definition: A space designated as a classroom. Other stations include spaces designated for special education and pull-out programs. ** General classrooms -7- Table 3 Middle School Level Inventory*** Middle School Building Area (sq. ft.) Teaching Stations* Permanent Capacity** Cascade MS 90,582 34 986 Chinook MS 87,476 27 783 Pacific MS 73,941 24 696 Sylvester MS 92,617 30 870 Big Picture MS (at Manhattan)^ 2 58 Choice (at Woodside) ^ 2 58 TOTAL 344,616 119 3,451 * Teaching Station Definition: A space designated as a general classroom. Other stations include spaces designated for special education and pull-out programs. ** General classrooms. ***Does not include alternative programs: CHOICE Academy MS/HS at Woodside site. ^The District anticipates that the Big Picture and Choice programs will be relocated in the 2019-20 school year to another District facility or leased space. Inventory adjustments will be reflected in future updates to this Capital Facilities Plan. Table 4 High School Level Inventory*** High School Building Area (sq. ft.) Teaching Stations* Permanent Capacity** Raisbeck Aviation HS 87,934 14 448 Big Picture HS (at Manhattan)^ 29,141 10 320 Evergreen HS 161,456 48 1,536 Highline HS 214,919 59 1,500 Mount Rainier HS 205,159 47 1,504 Tyee HS 143,101 38 1,216 TOTALS 841,710 227 6,524^^ * Teaching Station definition: A space designated as a general classroom. Other stations include spaces designated for special education and pull-out programs. ** Regular classrooms. ***Does not include alternative programs: CHOICE Academy MS/HS at Woodside site; New Start HS at Salmon Creek site; and Puget Sound Skills Center. ^ The District anticipates that the Big Picture program will be relocated in the 2019-20 school year to another District facility or leased space. Inventory adjustments will be reflected in future updates to this Capital Facilities Plan. ^^Total capacity at the high school level may be affected as the District makes programmatic changes in its small school high schools: Tyee HS and Evergreen HS. For example, spaces currently identified as teaching stations may be needed to serve special programs. -8- Table 5 Relocatable Classrooms (Portable) Inventory Elementary School Relocatables** Other*** Interim Capacity Beverly Park at Glendale 0 2 0 Bow Lake 0 4 0 Cedarhurst 1 3 25 Des Moines 0 1 0 Gregory Heights 0 0 0 Hazel Valley 3 1 75 Hilltop 5 1 125 Madrona 2 0 50 Marvista 2 0 50 McMicken Heights 0 0 0 Midway 4 0 100 Mount View 4 0 100 North Hill 0 0 0 Parkside 0 0 0 Seahurst 2 2 50 Shorewood 1 3 25 Southern Heights 2 1 50 White Center 1 3 25 TOTAL 27 21 675 Middle School Relocatables** Other *** Interim Capacity Cascade 0 3 0 Chinook 5 1 145 Pacific 4 0 116 Sylvester 2 2 58 Big Picture MS 4 7 116 TOTAL 15 13 435 High School Relocatable** Other*** Interim Capacity Raisbeck Aviation HS 0 0 0 Big Picture HS 0 0 0 Evergreen HS 3 2 96 Highline HS 0 0 0 Mount Rainier HS 0 0 0 Tyee HS 0 1 0 TOTALS 3 3 96 **Used for regular classroom capacity. ***The relocatables referenced under “other relocatables” are used for special pull-out programs, storage, community use, etc. -9- Generally, enrollment projections using historical calculations are most accurate for the initial years of the forecast period. Moving further into the future, more assumptions about economic conditions, land use, and demographic trends in the area affect the projection. Monitoring birth rates in the County and population growth for the area are essential yearly activities in the ongoing management of the CFP. In the event that enrollment growth slows, plans for new facilities can be delayed. It is much more difficult, however, to initiate new projects or expedite projects in the event enrollment growth exceeds the projections. With the assistance of a professional demographer, the District has developed its own methodology for forecasting future enrollments. This methodology, a modified cohort survival method, considers a variety of factors to evaluate the potential student population growth for the years 2018 through 2023. These factors include: projected births, projected growth in the K-12 population, and a model which considers growth in population and housing within the District’s boundaries. The methodology also considers the potential impacts on enrollment due to the recent opening of a charter school within the District’s boundaries. Certain assumptions are made regarding the continued enrollment at the charter school. Therefore, the methodology and the resulting projections should be considered conservative. District enrollment has increased in recent years, including a 5.87% increase since 2009. Using the modified cohort survival projections, a total enrollment of 19,703 students is expected in 2023. In other words, the District projects an increase of 3.79% in student enrollment (or 720 students) between 2017 and 2023. See Appendix B (Enrollment projections from Les Kendrick, December 2017.) Table 6 Projected Student Enrollment 2018-2023 Projection 2017* 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Actual Change Percent Change 18,983 18,932 18,941 18,974 19,132 19,436 19,703 720 3.79% *Actual October 2017 enrollment. SECTION FOUR: STUDENT ENROLLMENT TRENDS AND PROJECTIONS -10- Projected future capacity needs, shown in Tables 7-A through 7-C, are derived by applying the projected number of students to the projected permanent capacity. It is not the District’s policy to include relocatable classrooms when determining future capital facility needs; therefore, interim capacity provided by relocatable classrooms is not included in this analysis. The District will utilize relocatables as necessary to address interim capacity needs. Information on relocatable classrooms by grade level and interim capacity can be found in Table 5. Information on planned construction projects can be found in the Financing Plan, Table 8. Recent state-level policy decisions impact the District’s capacity analysis. Engrossed Senate House Bill 2261, adopted in 2009, requires school districts to implement full-day kindergarten by 2018. SHB 2776, passed in 2010, requires school districts to reduce K-3 class sizes to 17 students per teacher. Finally, in November 2014, the voters passed Initiative 1351, which requires reduced class sizes across all grades (K-12). The District has proactively implemented full day kindergarten, which reduced the number of available regular classrooms in elementary schools districtwide. Table 7 assumes that K-3 class size reduction is implemented by 2019 and that grade levels are reconfigured to K-5, 6-8, and 9-12 in 2019. All scenarios include the capacity related projects the District is planning during the six-year planning period. Future updates to this Plan will incorporate any funded implementation of Initiative 1351. SECTION FIVE: CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECTIONS FOR FUTURE NEEDS -11- *Actual October 2017 enrollment **Does not include portable capacity ^Implementation of reduced K-3 class size and adjusted Standard of Service; Movement of 6th grade to middle school level. ’’Addition of new classrooms at existing elementary schools and New Des Moines Elementary School opens at the Zenith site with added capacity Middle School Level -- Surplus/Deficiency *Actual October 2017 enrollment **Does not include portable capacity ^Movement of 6th grade to middle school level ’New middle school capacity added High School Level -- Surplus/Deficiency Table 7 Projected Student Capacity – 2018 through 2023 Elementary School Level -- Surplus/Deficiency 2017* 2018 2019^ 2020 2021 2022 2023 Existing Permanent Capacity 10,231 10,231 9,034 9,576 9,576 9,576 9,576 Added Permanent Capacity 0 0 542’’ 0 0 0 Total Permanent Capacity** 10,231 10,231 9,576 9,576 9,576 9,576 9,576 Enrollment 10,583 10,550 9,074 9,131 9,278 9,439 9,625 Surplus (Deficiency)** Permanent Capacity (352) (319) 502 445 298 137 (49) 2017* 2018 2019^ 2020 2021 2022 2023 Existing Permanent Capacity 3,451 3,451 3,451 4,401 4,401 4,401 4,401 Added Permanent Capacity 0 0 950’ 0 0 0 0 Total Permanent Capacity** 3,451 3,451 4,401 4,401 4,401 4,401 4,401 Enrollment 2,542 2,644 4,232 4,276 4,255 4,153 4,095 Surplus (Deficiency)** Permanent Capacity 909 807 169 125 146 248 306 2017* 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Existing Permanent Capacity 6,524 6,524 6,524 6,524 6,524” 6,524 6,524 Added Permanent Capacity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Permanent Capacity** 6,524 6,524 6,524 6,524 6,524 6,524 6,524 Enrollment 5,858 5,738 5,635 5,566 5,599 5,844 5,983 Surplus (Deficiency)** Permanent Capacity 666 786 889 958 925 680 541 *Actual October 2017 enrollment **Does not include portable capacity. ”Highline High School re-opens with at current site. -12- Planned Improvements The Finance Plan focuses on capacity related projects needed to accommodate recent and projected growth in the District. Based upon the scenario presented in Table 3, the District will need to add permanent classroom capacity at both the elementary school and middle school grade levels. Pursuant to the Board’s approval of the Capital Facilities Advisory Committee’s final recommendations and the voters’ approval of the 2016 bond, the District will: (1) add space to the new Des Moines Elementary School (replacement school at the Zenith site); (2) construct new elementary school classrooms at various sites, and (3) construct a new middle school. All new schools will be located on land currently owned by the District. In addition, new relocatable classrooms (portables) may need to be added at individual elementary schools and middle schools to accommodate future enrollment or to provide interim classrooms until permanent classroom capacity is built. The District has identified “non-capacity” capital needs at existing schools including the replacement of Highline High School and safety/security improvements at various schools. Financing for Planned Improvements Funding for planned improvements is typically secured from a number of sources including voter- approved bonds, State match funds, and impact fees. General Obligation Bonds: Bonds are typically used to fund construction of new schools and other capital improvement projects, and require a 60% voter approval. The District’s voters in November 2016 approved by 66.99% a $299.85 million school construction bond to fund the projects identified in this Plan. State School Construction Assistance Program Funds: State School Construction Assistance funds come from the Common School Construction Fund. The State deposits revenue from the sale of renewable resources from State school lands set aside by the Enabling Act of 1889 into the Common School Account. If these sources are insufficient to meet needs, the Legislature can appropriate General Obligation Bond funds or the Superintendent of Public Instruction can prioritize projects for funding. School districts may qualify for State School Construction Assistance funds for specific capital projects based on a prioritization system. The District received funding in the amount of $6.27 million from Senate Bill 6080 to address a portion of the classrooms needed for implementation of reduced K-3 class sizes. SECTION SIX: FINANCING PLAN -13- Impact Fees: Impact fees are a means of supplementing traditional funding sources for construction of public facilities needed to accommodate new development. See Section 7 School Impact Fees. The District also receives some funding toward school construction from the Port of Seattle/Federal Aviation Administration. This funding applies to the Des Moines Elementary Replacement and Addition project and the Highline High School replacement project. The Six-Year Financing Plan shown on Table 8 demonstrates how the District intends to fund new construction capacity and improvements to school facilities for the years 2018-2023. The financing components include bonds, SCAP funds, Port/FAA funds, and impact fees. The Financing Plan separates projects and portions of projects which add capacity from those which do not, since the latter are generally not appropriate for impact fee funding. Table 8 Capital Facilities Financing Plan (Costs in Millions)** Project 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total Cost Bonds/ Local Funds State Funds Impact Fees Port/FAA *** Elementary Schools Des Moines Elementary Replacement and Addition 30.000 27.782 $57.782 X X X X Elementary School Classrooms – various sites 3.00 5.00 $8.000 X SB 6080 Funds X Middle Schools New Middle School (950 capacity) 45.70 45.70 $91.401 X X Portables Portables at Various Sites .200 .200 .200 X X High Schools Highline High School 29.000 29.000 90.409 $148.409 X X X Land Purchase (elementary site for future growth) $20.000 X X **All projects are growth-related except Highline High School replacement. ***Construction costs used in impact fee formula are adjusted to recognize Port/FAA funding. -14- The GMA authorizes jurisdictions to collect impact fees to supplement funding of additional public facilities needed to accommodate new development. Impact fees cannot be used for the operation, maintenance, repair, alteration, or replacement of existing capital facilities used to meet existing service demands. Impact fees in Appendix C have been calculated utilizing the formula in the King County Code. The resulting figures are based on the District’s cost per dwelling unit to purchase land for school sites, make site improvements, construct schools, and purchase/install relocatable classrooms (portables). As required under the GMA, credits have also been applied in the formula to account for State Match Funds to be reimbursed to the District and projected future property taxes to be paid by the dwelling unit. The District’s cost per dwelling unit is derived by multiplying the cost per student by the applicable student generation rate per dwelling unit. The student generation rate is the average number of students generated by each housing type; in this case, single family dwellings and multi-family dwellings. Multi-family dwellings were broken out into one-bedroom and two-plus bedroom units. The District has developed its own student generation rate data based on actual permit data from local jurisdictions. For purposes of the 2018 CFP, the District is using the student generation rates developed in 2017. See Appendix D. Using the variables and formula described, and applying the 50% discount rate required by the King County School Impact Fee Ordinance, impact fees proposed as a part of this CFP, are summarized in Table 9 below. See also Appendix C. King County and the City of Kent currently have adopted school impact fee ordinances and collect school impact fees on behalf of the District. The District has requested that the other cities that it serves consider adoption of a school impact fee ordinance. Table 9 School Impact Fees 2018 Housing Type Impact Fee Per Dwelling Unit Single Family $2,573 Multi-Family $3,646 SECTION SEVEN: SCHOOL IMPACT FEES A-1 APPENDIX A DISTRICT MAP A-2 A-3 B-1 APPENDIX B POPULATION AND ENROLLMENT DATA B-2 C-1 APPENDIX C SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS C-2 D-1 APPENDIX D STUDENT GENERATION RATE DATA D-2 Highline School District Student Generation Rates In 2017, the District developed student generation rates based upon new residential development occurring within the District’s boundaries within the preceding five year period. The District compared student enrollment addresses to the addresses on permits for new dwelling units. Future updates to the Capital Facilities Plan will include updated information. Single Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years = 382 Elementary School Students occupying Single Family Residences = 58 Elementary Students Single Family Student Generation Rate = .1518 Single Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years = 382 Junior High School Students occupying Single Family Residences = 10 Junior High School Students Single Family Student Generation Rate = .0262 Single Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years = 382 High School Students occupying Single Family Residences = 25 High School Students Single Family Student Generation Rate = .0654 Multi-Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years = 43 Elementary School Students occupying Multi-Family Residences = 4 Elementary Students Multi-Family Student Generation Rate = .0930 Multi-Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years = 43 Junior High School Students occupying Multi-Family Residences = 2 Junior High School Students Multi-Family Student Generation Rate = .0465 Multi-Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years = 43 High School Students occupying Multi-Family Residences = 3 High School Students Multi-Family Student Generation Rate = .0698 1 School Impact Fees – 2018-2019 ORDINANCE NO. ________ AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending Section 12.13.160 of the Kent City Code to adjust the school impact fee schedules (CPA-2018-4). RECITALS A. The City of Kent has adopted a school impact fee program as authorized by the State Growth Management Act (GMA) and RCW 82.02.050. B. Chapter 12.13 of the Kent City Code (KCC) requires that the Capital Facilities Plans of school districts be submitted to the City of Kent on an annual basis for City Council review, and that this review must occur in conjunction with any update of the Capital Facilities Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City Council has reviewed the Capital Facilities Plans submitted by the school districts. C. The Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School Districts have requested amendments to the text of Kent City Code to reflect proposed changes to impact fees. D. On September 18, 2018, the City provided the required 60 day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 to the State of Washington of the 2 School Impact Fees – 2018-2019 City’s proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan and Chapter 12.13 of the KCC. The 60 day notice period has passed and by operation of law is deemed approved. E. After a public hearing before the City Council on November 6, 2018, the City Council on December 11, 2018, approved Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-2018-4 to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School Districts, and changes to the Kent City Code to reflect impact fees as follows: (1) for the Kent School District, increasing the school impact fee for single-family units to $5,397, and for multifamily units to $2,279; (2) for the Federal Way School District, increasing the school impact fee for single-family units to $7,221, and for multifamily units to $_____[BH1]; (3) for the Auburn School District, increasing the school impact fee for single-family units to $5,716, and increasing the school impact fee for multifamily units to $4,488; and (4) for the Highline School District, increasing the school impact fee for single-family units to $2,573 and for multifamily units to $3,646. F. In order to implement the new impact fee schedules referenced above, it is necessary to amend section 12.13.160 KCC. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE SECTION 1. – Amendment. Section 12.13.160 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 12.13.160. Base fee schedule. The following fee shall be assessed for the indicated types of development: 3 School Impact Fees – 2018-2019 School District Single-Family Multifamily Multifamily Studio Kent, No. 415 $5,3975,235.00 $2,2792,267.00 $0.00 Federal Way, No. 210 $7,2213,198.00 $8,386.00[BH2] 0.00 Auburn, No. 408 $5,7163,321.86 $4,4882,081.29 0.00 Highline, No. 401 $2,5732,290.00 $3,6463,162.00 0.00 SECTION 2. – Amendment. Section 12.13.170 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 12.13.170. Maximum allowable fees. School impact fees provided by this chapter shall be assessed based on the calculation set forth in KCC 12.13.140, unless they exceed a maximum allowable fee as set forth in this section. There shall be an increase in the maximum allowable fee each year by the same percentage as the percentage change in the previous calendar year’s average monthly Engineering News Record (ENR) Seattle Area Construction Cost Index values, relative to the corresponding average monthly ENR Construction Cost Index values for the preceding year, as calculated from October 1st through September 30th. The maximum allowable fee is set at $________ for single-family dwelling units and a maximum of $_______ for multifamily dwelling units for 2019.[BH3] 4 School Impact Fees – 2018-2019 SECTION 3. - Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering; or references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations. SECTION 4. – Severability. If any one or more section, subsection, or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, that decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. – Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law. DANA RALPH, MAYOR Date Approved ATTEST: KIMBERLEY A. KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted Date Published APPROVED AS TO FORM: PAT FITZPATRICK, CITY ATTORNEY PUBLIC COMMENT This page intentionally left blank. Agenda Item: Consent Calendar 8 CONSENT CALENDAR 8. City Council Action: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds to approve Consent Calendar Items A through F. Discussion Action 8A. Approval of Minutes. Minutes of October 2, 2018 City Council Meeting; October 6, 2018 Special Workshop; and October 9, 2018 Special Workshop – Approve This page intentionally left blank. Kent City Council Regular Meeting October 2, 2018 Minutes Kent, Washington Pending Approval Page 1 of 7 Date: October 2, 2018 Time: 7 p.m. Place: Council Chambers East/West Agenda: 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 7 p.m. with Mayor Ralph presiding. 2. Roll Call Mayor Ralph – Present Council President Boyce - Present Brenda Fincher, Councilmember – Present Dennis Higgins, Councilmember – Present Satwinder Kaur, Councilmember – Present Marli Larimer, Councilmember – Present Les Thomas, Councilmember – Excused Absence Toni Troutner, Councilmember – Present 3. Changes to the Agenda Derek Matheson, Chief Administrative Officer, added the “Proclamation for National Cyber Security Awareness Month,” after item 4A iii, and item 8M. “Excused Absence for Councilmember Thomas.” Council President Boyce moved to approve the agenda as amended, seconded by Councilmember Higgins. The motion passed unanimously with a vote of 6-0. 4. Public Communications A. Public Recognition Higgins, advised of a recent article in the Puget Sound Business Journal relating to the 100 best elementary schools in the Puget Sound region. The Kent School District had six elementary schools in the top 100. Four schools are inside the city limits of Kent, including Sunrise Elementary, Millennium Elementary, Martin Sortun Elementary, and Glenridge Elementary. Council President Boyce presented Mayor Ralph with the AWC Advanced Certificate of Municipal Leadership. Boyce provided details on the requirements to obtain the certification. i. Employee of the Month Mayor Ralph recognized Luke Brandeberry as the City’s October Employee of the Month. ii. Proclamation for Torklift’s Eight Annual Turkey Challenge Kirsten Stokes, Content Coordinator with Torklift Central, accepted the proclamation and provided details regarding the 8th Annual Kent Turkey Kent City Council Regular Meeting October 2, 2018 Minutes Kent, Washington Pending Approval Page 2 of 7 Challenge. Visit Torkliftcentral.com/turkey for information and to sign up to participate in the event. iii. Proclamation for Girl Scout Founder’s Day Mayor Ralph presented Holly Bork with the proclamation. Bork advised that additional information can be found online at Girl Scouts of Western Washington. iv. Proclamation for Cyber Security Awareness Month Mayor Ralph presented Mike Carrington, Information Technology Director with the City of Kent, with the proclamation. Carrington provided information regarding Cyber Security Awareness Month and initiatives for online safety best practices. Visit Staysafeonline.org/ncsam for more information. v. West Hill Cambridge Neighborhood Council Toni Azzola, Neighborhood Program Coordinator, introduced the West Hill Cambridge Neighborhood Council and provided information on the City’s Neighborhood Council program. B. Community Events Council President Boyce advised of past and upcoming games and events for the Thunderbirds and upcoming events at the accesso ShoWare Center. Councilmember Troutner welcomed the public to attend the police community meeting on October 18, 2018 at 7 pm at Neely-O’Brien Elementary. There will be a presentation on homelessness and information will be provided regarding crime-fighting activities. Councilmember Fincher invited the public to participate in upcoming Green Kent Events that will be held at Lake Fenwick park on October 6 and Clark Lake Park on October 13. Visit KentWA.gov/Parks for additional information. Fincher provided details on the upcoming Spotlight Series events and indicated additional information can be found at KentWA.gov/Arts. 5. Reports from Council and Staff Mayor Ralph Mayor Ralph provided information on her September 25, 2018 budget presentation to the Council. Mayor Ralph attended the awards ceremony for King County Executive Dow Constantine’s awards celebration. Reber Ranch won the Rural Small Business of the Year award and the Sidetrack Distillery was a finalist. Mayor Ralph attended the September 27, 2018, meeting of the Puget Sound Regional Council’s executive board. The board discussed the study done by the Puget Sound Kent City Council Regular Meeting October 2, 2018 Minutes Kent, Washington Pending Approval Page 3 of 7 Regional Council analyzing the space economy in Washington state that identifies the region’s competitive strengths and the actions needed to help grow the space sector, including Kent’s role in strengthening the space economy. Mayor Ralph advised of the Kent Police Department’s promotions of Andrew Grove and Robert Hollis to Commanders. Mayor Ralph advised that the City of Kent recently joined the King County Cities Climate Collaborative (K4C). The group is working together to directly respond to climate change and reduce global and local sources of climate pollution. Part of the plan includes planting one million trees and Kent is planting 30,000 trees on the Downey Farmstead. Derek Matheson, Chief Administrative Officer Matheson congratulated Kelly Peterson, the current Public Works Department Transportation Manager, on his appointment as the Sound Transit project liaison. He will coordinate the City’s interaction with Sound Transit on the west hill project. His salary will be 100% reimbursed by Sound Transit. Matheson indicated the City and Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority (PSRFA) have reached a conceptual agreement for services. Matheson indicated the City will buy one fewer firefighter in the Emergency Management division and will leave fire investigation with the PSRFA. The City will hire additional police officers with the funds saved by these changes. Matheson advised his written report is in today’s agenda packet and there is no executive session. Council President Boyce Boyce indicated there was no workshop or Operations Committee meetings today. Boyce advised of the upcoming City Council budget workshop to be held on October 6, 2018 from 8 a.m. – 3 p.m. Councilmember Kaur Councilmember Kaur serves on the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Advisory Council, Chair Committee. No report Councilmember Kaur serves on the Sound Cities Association Growth Management Planning Council. No report Councilmember Higgins Councilmember Higgins is the Chair of the Public Works Committee. The minutes are available online. Councilmember Higgins serves on the Sound Cities Association King County Regional Transit Committee. During the September 19, 2018 meeting, the committee received Kent City Council Regular Meeting October 2, 2018 Minutes Kent, Washington Pending Approval Page 4 of 7 a briefing on Metro Bus Base Capacity. The presentation described how operating base capacity affects Metro plans to expand bus service and that Metro is panning for a South King County base - four of five proposed locations are in the city of Kent. Kent staff will be reaching out to Metro for additional details. Councilmember Troutner Councilmember Troutner is the chair of the Public Safety Committee. No report. Councilmember Troutner serves on the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Board that will meet October 3, 2018. Councilmember Troutner serves on the Sound Cities Association Regional Law, Safety, and Justice Committee. Troutner indicated Chief Padilla spoke during the recent meeting regarding challenges his department is facing. Councilmember Fincher Councilmember Fincher serves on the Arts Commission and advised of upcoming Spotlight Series events and indicated the program is available online at KentWA.gov. Fincher advised of the new Kent Creates contest “Fall Colors,” and indicated the deadline to submit your entry is November 30, 2018. Fincher indicated that human service providers are invited to apply for grant funding that must be used to support under-represented/resourced populations. Applications are due October 5, 2018. Visit KentWA.gov to download and print the application materials. Fincher invited everyone to take the Kent Parks, Recreation and Community Services survey available at KentWa.gov. The deadline to submit your survey responses is October 4, 2018. Fincher advised of the teen youth and adaptive recreation programs that are open for registration at KentWA.gov. Fincher serves on the King Conservation District Advisory Committee and indicated during the last meeting there were discussions on urban forestry, the food program, and the Living Well Kent program. Fincher serves on the Sound Cities Association Mental Illness and Drug Dependency Oversight Committee and during the last meeting assisted enforcement was discussed. 6. Public Hearing None. Kent City Council Regular Meeting October 2, 2018 Minutes Kent, Washington Pending Approval Page 5 of 7 7. Public Comment Barbara Smith, Executive Director of the Downtown Kent Partnership, provided details regarding the Morrill Bank Building and the Vote Your Main Street contest. Smith requested everyone visit Voteyourmainstreet.org/Kent to vote five times per day for the Morrill Bank Building. Joe Miles, representing Friends of Soos Creek Park, expressed his appreciation of Danielle Butsick’s outstanding work regarding the urban separator item on today’s consent calendar. Miles complimented the Land Use and Planning Board for their review of the urban separator, and the Economic and Community Development Committee for their review. Miles indicated there was a fair process that was predictable and open to suggestions. 8. Consent Calendar Council President Boyce moved to approve the Consent Calendar Items A through M, seconded by Councilmember Troutner. The motion passed unanimously with a 6-0 vote. A. Minutes of September 18, 2018 Workshop and City Council Meeting and September 25, 2018, Special City Council Meeting and Special Workshop – Approve Minutes of the September 18, 2018 Workshop and City Council Meeting, and September 25, 2018 Special City Council Meeting and Special Workshop were approved. B. Set October 16, 2018 as the date for the Second Public Hearing on the 2019-2020 Biennial Budget – Approve Council approved setting October 16, 2018 as the second public hearing on the 2019- 2020 Biennial Budget at the regular City Council meeting. C. Set October 16, 2018 as the date for the Second Public Hearing on the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Plan – Approve Council approved setting October 16, 2018 as the date for the Second Public Hearing on the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Plan. D. Set October 16, 2018 as the date for the Public Hearing on the 2018 Property Tax Levy for the 2019 Budget – Approve Council approved setting October 16, 2018 as the Date for the Public Hearing on the 2018 Property Tax Levy for the 2019 Budget. E. Set October 16, 2018 as the date for the Public Hearing on the Comprehensive Plan Capital Facilities Element Amendment for School District Capital Facilities Plans – Approve Council approved setting October 16, 2018 as the date for the Public Hearing on the Comprehensive Plan Capital Facilities Element Amendment for School District Capital Facilities Plans. Kent City Council Regular Meeting October 2, 2018 Minutes Kent, Washington Pending Approval Page 6 of 7 F. 2018 Asphalt Grinding Project – Accept as Complete The Mayor was authorized to accept the 2018 Asphalt Grinding Project as complete and release retainage to Statewide Parking Lot Services, Inc., upon receipt of standard releases from the state and the release of any liens. G. Lake Fenwick Floating Walkway Replacement Project – Accept as Complete The Mayor was authorized to accept the Lake Fenwick Floating Walkway Replacement Project as complete and release $29,487.50 in retainage to Massana Construction, upon receipt of standard releases from the state and the release of any liens. H. Resolution Recognizing the West Hill Cambridge Neighborhood Council – Adopt Council adopted Resolution No. 1976, recognizing the West Hill Cambridge Neighborhood Council, supporting its community building efforts, and conferring on it all opportunities offered by the City’s neighborhood program. I. Write-offs of Uncollectable Accounts – Authorize The Mayor was authorized to write off uncollectable accounts owed to the City in the amount of $181,686.86 subject to final approval of the Finance Director and City Attorney. J. Agreement with Skycorp, Ltd for Walla and Lake Property Demolitions – Authorize The Mayor was authorized to sign the Public Works Agreement with Skycorp, Ltd., in the amount of $80,245, for the demolition of houses and outbuildings on the Lake and Walla properties at Clark Lake Park, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the Parks Director and City Attorney. K. Urban Separators – Adopt No-Action Alternative The Council adopted the no-action alternative regarding Urban Separators as recommended by the Economic and Community Development Committee and the Land Use and Planning Board, as presented by staff, and deny comprehensive plan amendment requests DKT-2014-2 and DKT-2015-1 for not satisfying the review criteria or standards for comprehensive plan amendments in Chapter 12.02 KCC. L. Water Service Area Boundary Adjustment Agreement with Water District #111 – Authorize The Mayor was authorized to sign the Water Service Area Boundary Adjustment Agreement between the City of Kent and King County Water District No 111, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public Works Director. 9. Other Business None. Kent City Council Regular Meeting October 2, 2018 Minutes Kent, Washington Pending Approval Page 7 of 7 10. Bids None. 11. Executive Session and Action after Executive Session None. 12. Adjournment Mayor Ralph adjourned the meeting at 7:56 pm. Kimberley A. Komoto City Clerk October 2, 2018 This page intentionally left blank. Kent City Council Special Workshop October 6, 2018 Minutes Kent, Washington Pending Approval Page 1 of 5 Date: October 6, 2018 Time: 8 a.m. Place: Council Chambers East/West Attending: Dana Ralph, Mayor Bill Boyce, Council President Brenda Fincher, Councilmember Dennis Higgins, Councilmember Satwinder Kaur, Councilmember Marli Larimer, Councilmember Toni Troutner, Councilmember Council President Boyce opened the meeting at 8:04 a.m. Agenda: 2019-2020 Biennial Budget Process Aaron BeMiller, Finance Director, provided an overview of the Mayor’s Proposed 2019- 20 Biennial Budget and distributed replacement pages (updates) to the 2019-20 Mayor’s Proposed Budget. Replacement pages include 11-15, 61, 51, 52, 119, and 120. BeMiller provided a brief overview of the workshop agenda, the list of Councilmember Larimer’s questions, responses to those questions, and department presentation materials. PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Julie Parascondola, Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Director, provided details regarding the Parks, Recreation & Community Services Department 2019- 2020 budget, including accomplishments, base operating budget, funding sources, base operating services, shifts and reductions, unfunded needs. Parascondola advised that there are no new appropriations that are requested for the 2019-2020 budget. Councilmembers expressed their appreciation of Parascondola’s detailed and thorough presentation. Parascondola responded to council’s questions and will return to a future workshop to provide information regarding the Green Kent Events and the role of volunteers in those events, and information on the Green River Trail/Van Doren’s project, including the scope of project and why the City is contributing a large amount of funding towards the project. ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT (Mayor’s Office, including a Communications Department, and the Clerk’s Office) Derek Matheson, Chief Administrative Officer, provided details regarding the Administration Department’s 2019-20 budget, including accomplishments, base Kent City Council Special Workshop October 6, 2018 Minutes Kent, Washington Pending Approval Page 2 of 5 operating budget, funding sources, base operating services, reductions, new appropriations, and unfunded needs. Boyce suggested the City evaluate all membership fees. Higgins advised he is proud of the Administration Department for the outstanding improvements to communications. Larimer received confirmation that the communications team is open to taking on interns. Matheson provided details regarding the timeline for the testing and implementation of the body worn camera program. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Tim LaPorte, Public Works Director, provided details regarding the Public Works Department’s 2019-20 budget, including accomplishments, base operating budget, funding sources, base operating services, reductions, new appropriations, and unfunded needs. BREAK 9:30 a.m. – 9:50 a.m. MUNICIPAL COURT Margaret Yetter, Court Administrator, provided details regarding the Municipal Court’s 2019-20 budget, including accomplishments, base operating budget, funding sources, base operating services, reductions, new appropriations, and unfunded needs. Yetter advised that prior to the implementation of the red-light camera program, the court will request and additional full-time employee to meet the staffing needs of both the red-light and school zone traffic safety camera programs. POLICE DEPARTMENT Assistant Chief Hemmen provided details regarding the Police Department’s 2019-20 budget, including accomplishments, base operating budget, funding sources, base operating services, reductions, new appropriations, and unfunded needs. Hemmen will return to a future workshop to provide information on the parking enforcement full time employee and how much of the employment costs the City expects to be recovered through parking fees. LAW DEPARTMENT Pat Fitzpatrick, City Attorney, provided details regarding the Law Department’s 2019- 20 budget, including accomplishments, base operating budget, funding sources, base operating services, reductions, new appropriations, and unfunded needs. Kent City Council Special Workshop October 6, 2018 Minutes Kent, Washington Pending Approval Page 3 of 5 BeMiller provided information to Councilmember Higgins regarding the volatility of shifting costs to the criminal justice fund. Councilmember Higgins expressed a desire to obtain more information on vacating pre-existing marijuana convictions that would not be charged under current law. Fitzpatrick provided information and responded to council’s questions regarding the prosecutor’s role in providing assistance and resources to victims of domestic violence. Fitzpatrick indicated that the new full-time employee appropriation, that will come out of the body worn camera fund, will not be filled until the need arises. ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Kurt Hanson, Economic and Community Development Department Director, provided details regarding the 2019-20 budget, including accomplishments, base operating budget, funding sources, base operating services, reductions, new appropriations, and unfunded needs. Hanson provided responses to council’s questions regarding code enforcement. HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Marty Fisher, Human Resources Department Director, provided details regarding the 2019-20 budget, including accomplishments, base operating budget, funding sources, base operating services, reductions, new appropriations, and unfunded needs. BeMiller provided information on Kent’s medical benefits and indicated they are similar to surrounding jurisdictions. BeMiller advised that Kent is self-insured and does not benefit from the Association of Washington Cities benefit trust. Fisher responded to Troutner’s questions regarding the budgeted amount of funds for supported employment and the current use of those funds. Fincher suggested the city extend cultural community training to residents of Kent. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT Mike Carrington, Information Technology Director, provided details regarding the 2019-20 budget, including accomplishments, base operating budget, funding sources, base operating services, reductions, new appropriations, and unfunded needs. Kent City Council Special Workshop October 6, 2018 Minutes Kent, Washington Pending Approval Page 4 of 5 FINANCE DEPARTMENT Aaron BeMiller, Finance Director, provided details regarding the 2019-20 budget, including accomplishments, base operating budget, funding sources, base operating services, reductions, new appropriations, and unfunded needs. BeMiller advised that the current staff member in the full-time employee position that is being reduced has already accepted a position and will move to the Public Works Department next week. LUNCH BREAK FROM 11:44 A.M. – 12:23 P.M. DEPARTMENT QUESTIONS Q & A None SIGNIFICANT REVENUE/EXPENSE CHANGES BeMiller walked the Council through the significant revenue and expense changes as follows: Page 39 and 107 – Details regarding redirecting where the funds are coming from to pay for the fuel item upgrade. Originally from the Fleet Fund and is changing to the Capital Resources fund. Page 86 – Capital Improvement Program. Parks projects in 2020 include an allocation of 1.5 million from the Capital Resources Fund. Pages 124 & 126 – Sewerage Utility Fund is being separated from the Drainage Utility Fund. Page 34 – Details regarding the estimate impact of the Central Cost Allocation Plan on the 2020 budget. Revenue Changes: Page 25 – Major revenue changes for the General Fund reserves – The increase in the permit and plans review revenue is not a fee increase, it reflects an increase in volume. BeMiller will provide a pie chart of all the components that went into balancing the general fund in 2020 in addition to how the tax percentages are expected to shift over the next 5-10 years. B&O change Page 22 - In 2017 Council approved an increase to the square footage tax that was dedicated to capital purposes. The 2019-20 Mayor’s Proposed Budget allocates these monies to parks capital projects. Another square footage tax increase is proposed for 2020, with the additional revenues dedicated to general operations. Kent City Council Special Workshop October 6, 2018 Minutes Kent, Washington Pending Approval Page 5 of 5 Matheson confirmed that a change to allow for increases to property tax in line with inflation are being included in the City’s legislative agenda. BeMiller provided details regarding changes to the allocations of B&O taxes and the elimination of the sunset provision. CAPITAL PROGRAM BeMiller reviewed capital projects, capital investments over the past decade; capital additions for utilities, transportation, including B&O funded. Capital additions for parks and accesso ShoWare Center, facilities, fleet, and information technology. BeMiller advised that the six-year view for the Capital Improvement Program begins on page 74. BeMiller advised that if the City receives county funds for the accesso ShoWare Center, there will be a supplemental budget adjustment ordinance brought before the Operations Committee and onto the full council. OTHER ITEMS/WRAP UP Council President Boyce indicated there will be a special workshop on October 9, 2018 at 5 p.m. and October 16, 2018 will be reserved for a possible workshop. Boyce expressed his appreciation for the tremendous amount of work done by department directors, staff, the Mayor and Council. Boyce requested the council members continue reviewing the budget and to be prepared to bring any questions, concerns, or proposed changes to the October 9, 2018, special workshop. The meeting concluded at 12:59 p.m. Kimberley A. Komoto City Clerk October 6, 2018 This page intentionally left blank. Kent City Council Special Workshop October 9, 2018 Minutes Kent, Washington Pending Approval Page 1 of 3 Date: October 9, 2018 Time: 5 p.m. Place: Council Chambers East/West Attending: Dana Ralph, Mayor Bill Boyce, Council President Brenda Fincher, Councilmember Dennis Higgins, Councilmember Satwinder Kaur, Councilmember Marli Larimer, Councilmember Toni Troutner, Councilmember Council President Boyce opened the meeting at 5:04 p.m. Agenda: 2019-2020 Biennial Budget Process Aaron BeMiller, Finance Director, provided a review of today’s agenda in addition to providing the Council with materials relating to the Questions and answers from the October 6, 2018 workshop. BeMiller provided further details in response to: Question #28 – Provide a pie chart of all the components that went into balancing the General Fund for 2020; and Question #29 – Looking at the General Fund revenue graph on page 25, how are the tax percentages expected to shift over the next 5-10 years? BeMiller provided additional details on the expected percentage changes over the next 10 years, based on the 15-year forecast. BeMiller responded to question #30 – If an additional parking enforcement FTE is authorized, how much of those costs could be expected to be recovered through parking fees? Chief Padilla provided further information regarding the duties of the current parking enforcement officer. BeMiller advised of the financial impact of increasing the FTE to a full-time employee. Council requested the Finance Department research industry standards and what parking enforcement officers are compensated in addition to their duties. Marty Fisher, Human Resources Director, responded to Question #31 – Request to add $30,000 in the HR budget for outside training. Councilmembers supported the idea of community conversations and sought further information regarding how the funds will be spent and where it comes from. Reducing the budget and utilizing Uriel Varela, the City’s Cultural Community Coordinator to bring in speakers was suggested. BeMiller will return to the next workshop with additional information. Kent City Council Special Workshop October 9, 2018 Minutes Kent, Washington Pending Approval Page 2 of 3 Fisher responded to Question #32 – Related to new temporary employees hiring in and then moving to another department within a short space of time, do we or can we say that they can’t move to another department for X number of months? Fisher responded to Question #33 – Clarify the supported employment budget of $40,000 and using about $30,000. Is there currently a surplus for that line item? Julie Parascondola, Parks, Recreation and Community Services Director and Tim LaPorte, Public Works Director responded to Question #34 – Provide additional information on the Green River Trail/Van Doren’s project, including scope of project and why the City is contributing a large amount of funding towards the project. Parascondola responded to Question #35 – Is there an opportunity to use volunteer inters to begin addressing Parks GIS needs? Parascondola responded to Question #36 – Is there an option to have an Adopt-A- Park program for groups to organize themselves for clean-ups? Is there a limit of volunteer hours the department can log per year? Fisher provided confirmation that the City’s union contract contains standard language regarding the use of volunteers. Higgins suggested revising the union contract to include language for volunteers to be able to work on Green Kent events. Additional follow up BeMiller responded to Kaur’s question regarding the 13.6% increase in the General Fund for the Finance Department as follows: (1) Recent reclassifications; and (2) because of the Cost Allocation Plan, expenditures that were sent out to other funds are now being reduced. BeMiller responded to Kaur’s question regarding the 3 million increase in police are due to salaries, increase in number of positions, recruitment division, increases for body worn cameras, in car cameras, and red-light cameras. Additionally, since police has a large FTE count, the 20% medical increase that everyone is sharing amounts to a larger amount in the police department. Chief Padilla responded to Kaur’s question regarding the policy on how far an officer can take their assigned police car home. Padilla advised that the policy is not finalized, but he anticipates the distance will be 40-45 miles. Next steps BeMiller advised that during the October 16, 2018 final Council workshop final requests and decisions will need to be made. Kent City Council Special Workshop October 9, 2018 Minutes Kent, Washington Pending Approval Page 3 of 3 On October 16, 2018, the 7 p.m. Council meeting will include the public hearing for the property tax levy and second public hearings for the budget and Capital Improvement Plan. Budget items will go before the Operations Committee on November 6, 2018. The budget items will go before the full Council for adoption on November 20, 2018. The meeting concluded at 6:09 p.m. Kimberley A. Komoto City Clerk October 9, 2018 This page intentionally left blank. Agenda Item: Consent Calendar – 8B 8B. Approval of Bills: Approval of payment of the bills received through August 31, 2018 and paid on August 31, 2018. The Operations Committee audited the payment of bills on September 18, 2018. Approval of checks issued for vouchers: Date Check Numbers Amount 08/31/18 Wire Transfers 7627 - 7641 $1,915,662.64 08/31/18 Regular Checks 727239 - 727943 $5,788,238.37 08/31/18 Payment Plus 101041 - 101074 $94,379.82 Void Checks ($32.88) 08/31/18 Use Tax Payable $4,389.91 $7,802,637.86 Approval of checks issued for payroll for August 16, 2018, and paid on August 31, 2018: Date Check Numbers Amount 8/3/18 Checks $0.00 Voids and Reissues 8/3/18 Advices 413040 - 413917 $1,858,943.88 $1,858,943.88 This page intentionally left blank. Agenda Item: Consent Calendar – 8C TO: City Council DATE: October 16, 2018 SUBJECT: Set Public Hearing Date on the Development Agreement with Sound Transit - Approve SUMMARY: Staff has been negotiating a Development Agreement and a Transit Way Agreement with Sound Transit for the Federal Way Link Extension Light Rail project. These two agreements set out the roles and responsibilities for both agencies with regards to the construction and operation of light rail transit in the City of Kent, including two light rail stations and guideway track. The agreements include design standards, review procedures, vesting, and dispute resolution, and include a commitment to mutually resolve any issues that arise to ensure that the Federal Way Link Extension project begins operations by 2024. State law requires that a public hearing be held prior to Council’s approval of a development agreement. Staff recommends Council conduct the public hearing on November 6, 2018, at its regular meeting. EXHIBITS: None STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL(S): ☒ Innovative Government – Delivering outstanding customer service, developing leaders, and fostering innovation. ☒ Evolving Infrastructure – Connecting people and places through strategic investments in physical and technological infrastructure. ☒ Thriving City - Creating safe neighborhoods, healthy people, vibrant commercial districts, and inviting parks and recreation. ☒ Sustainable Services – Providing quality services through responsible financial management, economic growth, and partnerships. ☒ Inclusive Community - Embracing our diversity and advancing equity through genuine community engagement. MOTION: Set November 6, 2018 as the date for the public hearing on the Development Agreement with Sound Transit. This page intentionally left blank. Agenda Item: Consent Calendar – 8D TO: City Council DATE: October 16, 2018 SUBJECT: Appointments to Parks & Recreation Commission - Confirm SUMMARY: The Mayor requests Council confirm her appointment of Todd Minor, Kristie Duggan, Ed Keeley, Scott R Taylor, and Tim Wilson (as an alternate) to fill vacant positions on the Kent Parks & Recreation Commission for three-year terms that will expire December 31, 2021. Todd Minor has called the East Hill neighborhood of Kent home since 2012. Todd, his wife Tanieka, and their five children consider Kent to be beautiful, warm and welcoming. Their family has grown accustomed to leveraging the vast number of city parks and recreation programming to create lasting family memories. Todd, who leads a business unit for Microsoft, is known as a servant leader, a collaborator and common-sense thinker. Strong appreciation and gratitude have driven Todd to serve on the Parks and Recreation Commission for this amazing city! Kristie Duggan is a long time Kent resident. She works as a Human Resources Manager for a local company. Her three children graduated from Kent schools, and as a family, they spent many hours at the various Kent parks while watching basketball, baseball, softball, and soccer games. She saw the opportunity of joining the Parks and Recreation Commission as an opportunity to give back to the community and making sure that future Kent generations can enjoy the park system as her kids did growing up. Ed Keeley has lived in Kent next to Springwood park since early 2001. Ed holds a degree in business management and had enjoyed a 19-year continuing career in the event management industry working for some of the largest names in the technical field. Utilizing the city’s parks year-round with his wife of 21 years, he was very excited to hear a spot on the commission had opened and presented an opportunity for him to become involved to help make Kent a better place for its residents. Scott R Taylor is a long-term resident of Kent having lived 30 years next to Pine Tree Elementary (southern Kent East Hill) and now lives at Kent Station. He and his wife Debbie met playing volleyball at Kent Commons and raised three children in Kent. They have long utilized many facets of the Parks and Recreation facilities including sports, dance, adaptive recreation and especially the parks and trails around town. He coached both daughters in Parks Volleyball and Soccer Leagues. His adult son continues to heavily use the Adaptive Recreation classes and is currently taking swimming, computing, and bowling. He is President of an international computer software developer with offices in Kent and Stockholm. He previously served on the Kent Bicycle MOTION: Confirm the Mayor’s appointment of Todd Minor, Kristie Duggan, Ed Keeley, Scott R Taylor, and Tim Wilson to the Kent Parks & Recreation Commission. Advisory Board as well as many state and national offices with the Sierra Club. Tim Wilson and his wife have lived in Kent for three years and in a short time have seen improvements to the City and feel there is much more work to be done and wants to be a part of that progression. Having a background in parks as a Summer Camp and Outdoor Education Director, representing his community as a Parks and Recreation Commissioner is a natural fit for him to contribute and give back. EXHIBITS: None RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor Ralph BUDGET IMPACT: N/A STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL(S): ☒ Innovative Government – Delivering outstanding customer service, developing leaders, and fostering innovation. ☒ Evolving Infrastructure – Connecting people and places through strategic investments in physical and technological infrastructure. ☒ Inclusive Community - Embracing our diversity and advancing equity through genuine community engagement. 0. Agenda Item: Consent Calendar – 8E TO: City Council DATE: October 16, 2018 SUBJECT: Downey and Naden Clearing and Grading Change Order - Authorize SUMMARY: The latest phase of the Downey and Naden Clearing and Grading Project is currently under construction with clearing of the Downey site and excavation of material paid for with grant funds. The contract for this work was awarded to Scarsella Brothers, Inc. in July. King County has approved another $780,000 in grant funds for the Downey Farmstead. Staff is recommending a change order to the existing contract that would allow the City to move more material from the Downey Farmstead site and advance the project further towards completion. The excavated material will be exported to the City owned Naden Avenue property in preparation for selling that site for future development. There is some additional site preparation activity that is required at the Naden site to accommodate the larger amount of fill material. EXHIBITS: Change Order RECOMMENDED BY: This is going before the Public Works Committee on October 15, 2018. BUDGET IMPACTS: Additional work on the Downey site will be completed using the $780,000 Cooperative Watershed Management Grant. Work on the Naden site will be completed using other City funds. STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL(S): ☒ Innovative Government – Delivering outstanding customer service, developing leaders, and fostering innovation. ☒ Evolving Infrastructure – Connecting people and places through strategic investments in physical and technological infrastructure. ☒ Thriving City - Creating safe neighborhoods, healthy people, vibrant commercial districts, and inviting parks and recreation. ☒ Sustainable Services – Providing quality services through responsible financial management, economic growth, and partnerships. MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to sign a change order in the amount of $792,369 for the Downey and Naden Clearing and Grading Project, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public Works Director. This page intentionally left blank. KENT WÂsHrNcrôñ CHANGE ORDER NO, # 2 NAME OF CONTRACTOR: Scarsella Bros. Inc. ("Contractor,,) CONTRACT NAME & PROJECT NUMBER: Downey and Naden Clearing and Grad¡ng ORIGINAL CONTRACT DATE: August 1. 2018 This Change Order amends the above-referenced contract; all other provisions of thecontract that are not inconsistent with this Change Order shall remain in effect. For valuableconsideration and by mutual consent of the parties, the project contract is modified as follows: 1. Section I of the Agreement, entitled "Description of Work," is hereby modified to addadditional work or revise existing work as follows: In addition to work required under the original Agreement and any prior Amendments, Contractor shall provide all labor, materials, and equipment necessary to : This change order removes an additional 36,000 cubic yards of soil fromthe Downey Farmstead site and places it at Naden site. King CountyFlood Control District has made available addítional King County Cooperative Watershed Management grant in the amount of $Z3O,OO0to perform this additional work. 2. Completion, The contract amount and time for performance provisions of Section II .'Time of" and section III, "compensation," are hereby modified as follows: Original Contract Sum, (including applicable alternates and wssr) $857,754.81 Net Change by Previous Change Orders ( incl. applicable WSST) $21,030.68 Current Contract Amount (incl. Previous Change Orders) $878,785.49 Current Change Order $220,335.00 Applicable WSST Tax on this Change Order $72,033.50 Revised Contract Sum $1,671,153.99 CHANGE ORDER - 1 OF 3 Oríginal Time for Completion (insert date) 35 working days Revised Time for Completion under prior Change Orders (insert date) 0 Days Required (+) for this Change Order 20 calendar days Revised Time for Completion (insert date) 55 working days In accordance with Sections L-04.4 and 1-04.5 of the Kent and WSDOT Standard Specifications, and Section VII of the Agreement, the Contractor accepts all requirements of this Change Order by signing below. Also, pursuant to the above-referenced contract, Contractor agrees to waive any protest it may have regarding this Change Order and acknowledges and accepts that this Change Order constitutes final settlement of all claims of any kind or nature arising from or connected with any work either covered or affected by this Change Order, including, without limitation, claims related to contract time, contract acceleration, onsite or home office overhead, or lost profits. This Change Order, unless otherwise provided, does not relieve the Contractor from strict compliance with the guarantee and warranty provisions of the original contract, particularly those pertaining to substantial completion date. All acts consistent with the authority of the Agreement, previous Change Orders (if any), and this Change Order, prior to the effective date of this Change Order, are hereby ratified and affirmed, and the terms of the Agreement, previous Change Orders (if any), and this Change Order shall be deemed to have applied. The parties whose names appear below swear under penalty of perjury that they are authorized to enter into this contract modification, which is binding on the parties of this contract. 3. The Contractor will adjust the amount of its performance bond (if any) for this project to be consistent with the revised contract sum shown in section 2, above, IN WITNESS, the parties below have executed this Agreement, which will become effective on the last date written below. CONTRACTOR: By (signature) Print Name:âtnn 9n IIrt- I tç,t.l ir¿ , fu"1i åer* (t¡ile) DATE CITY OF KENT: By (signature) Print Name: Dana RalphIts Mayor (title) DATE: CHANGE ORDER - 2 OF 3 APPROVED AS TO FORM: (applicable ¡f Mayor's signature required) Kent Law Department Mayor[In th¡s field, you may enter the e¡ectronic f¡lepatb where the @ntract has been saved] CHANGE ORDER - 3 OF 3 FILE NO: 2OO.2KENT CHANGE ORDER WORKSHEET NO. 2 Construction Engineering Division - Fublic Works Project: Downey/Naden Clearing&Grading Project Engineer: Thomas Leyrer Capital Projects Paul Kuehne Manager: Project No.l 18-3007,1 Fed-Aid No.l Contractor: Scarsella Bros Date: 9/25120t8 I. PROPOSED CHANGE This and ch a n g e re m OV es a n a d d t to n a 3 6 ,000 c u b c ya rd S of soi fro m the D o WN ey F a r m stea d s ite aces it at t h e N aden site The Dow ney excavation is part of a habitat enhancement project to create a new Green River side channel. King County Flood Control District has made available additional King County Cooperative Watershed Management Grant in the amount of $780,000 to performing thís additional work. Naden roves to be a less ex ensive alternative to other soil dum sites. II. REASON AND BACKGROUND FOR CHANGE III. METHOD OF PAYMENT All Costs For This Change Are Paid Via Increases To Bid Item Quantities. See Attached Revised Bid Tab Quantities Spreadsheet. TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF CHANGE ORDER * *Total of the Cost of ftem Columns THIS PAY ESTIMATE IV. WORKING DAYS TOTAL WORKING DAYS*55 *This Change Order + Prev¡ous Total All work, materials and measurements to be in accordance with the Standard Specifications and Contract Special Provisions for the type of work described. t 79 o Original Contract 35 Due This Change Order*2A Previous Total 35 3/27/L8 REV. DATE FILE NO: 2OO.2T<ENT Capital Projects Manager: Construction Engineering Supervisor: Construction Manager:'-'4¿-' '4,-/ ".-¿í*7t4 e-- c/-zs-_bt{ ol .zI-b)y î''./ Date: Date Date: 2 3/271L8 REV. DATE: Dewncy and Naden Clearing and crad¡ng SCHEDULE B (ALTERÍ{ATE): EARTHWORK - DowNEY 2000 Mobillzat¡on 2005 Clearing & Grading 2007 Salvage Trees 2009 Remove & Ch¡p Trees 2011 Excavation, Including Haul & Compact¡on 2012 Excavation & Haul of Unsuitaþle Mater¡al 2013 Aeration 2015 Removal of Debr¡s & Garbage 2018 Remove & Relcoate Cement Concrete Jersey Barr¡er 2025 Water 2055 Minor Changes 2060 Health & Safety plan 2065 Traffic Control Labor 2070 Construct¡on Signs Class A 2075 Trcîfic Control Supervisor 2080 Temporary Traffic Control Devices 2095 Seed¡ng, Fert¡l¡z¡ng, & Mutching 2100 F¡lter Fabr¡c Fence 2115 ESC Lead 2120 Street Clean¡ng 2125 Stab¡lized Construct¡on Entrance 2130 SPCC Plan 2135 Erosion/Water Pollutoin Control SCHEDULE 8 TOTAL SCHEDULE C (ALTERNAIE): NADEN SIIE IMPRoVEMENTS 3000 Mobil¡zation 3005 Naden S¡te Clearing & crubbing 3008 Salvâge Evergreen Trees w¡th Rootwads from Naden 3015 Removal of Debr¡s & Garbage 3020 Remove Cement Concrete Sidewalk 3025 Water 3055 Minor Changes 3060 Naden Heath & Safety ptan 3065 Traffic Control Labor 3070 Construction Signs Class A 3075 Traffic Control Supervlsor 3080 Temporary Traffic Control Devices 3095 Seeding, Fert¡llzin9, & Mulchinq 3100 Filter Fðbr¡c Fence 3115 ESC Lead 3120 Street Clean¡ng 3125 Stabilized Construction Entrance 3130 SPCC Plan 3135 Erosion/water Pollut¡on Control 3200 lnlet Protection 3205 Sediment Pond 3210 Storm Sewer Pipe, 12 Inch D.I. 3215 Foundation Material, Class I & II 3220 Crushed Surfacing Top Course, 5/8 Inch Minus 3230 Cement Concrete S¡dewalk SC}IEDULE C TOTAL iUMMARY SCHEDULE I (ALTERNATE)r EARTHWORK - DOWNEy #REFI TOTAL SCHEDULES SALES TÃX. 7O,OO/O CHANGE ORDERS Downey Increase I 759,467 Naden Increase 3 32.902 Scarsclla Brothcrs, Inc. 28,500.00 44,000.00 100. 100. 17. 23. 40,000. 100.00 125.00 0.01 1 5,000.00 I,) 59. 20. 67. 500. 5.00 75_00 0.01 10,000.00 20,000.00 100. 20. 0, 10,000. 1,750.00 59.75 20.00 67.7 500, 7,570. 5. 75. 0.01 18.00 500.00 500. 15,000. 100. 75. 75. 100.00 CONTRACI SUMMARY DEsCRIPTTON rTEH NO. UNÍf PRICE ORTGINAL CONIRÀCT QUANTITY Al.rOUNt CHANGE ORDER I T'VCRE¡SF OUANTTTV AI.,OUNT NEW CONÍPACÍ TOTALS QUANTIW A''OUNT $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ st $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ I $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $t LS LS EA CY SY MGAL CALC L5 HR SF HR LS AC LF HR HR SY LS FA ËA L5 LF TON TON SY r20 260 29,9r1 $ $ $ $ 36,000 1 69O,424 500 10,000 $s $$ L5 LS EA EA BCY BCY FA CY EA MGAL CALC, 1 100 50 30 28,500 44,000 20,000 25,000 334,400 23,300 40,000 30,000 3,125 5 15,000 I,750 1 1,950 2,000 6,775 500 23,O79 13,000 4,500 3 7,200 500 15,000 64r.58t 633,600 40,000 3,388 260 LS 1OO HR SF 50 HR 0.52 LS AC LF HR 160 HR 400 sY LS FA 1LS fL> 2OO EA 250 EA 19,000 BcY 1,000 BcY 1FA 300 cY 25 EA 5OO MGAL 1 CALC 1LS 2OO HR 1OO SF 1OO HR 115 r4.7 AC 2,600 LF 60 HR 320 HR 4OO SY 1LS 1FA 10,000 20,000 6,000 10,000 200 5 10,000 1,750 5,975 2,000 3,388 s00 7,065 8,500 4,500 2 4,680 500 15,000 r,250 10,000 6,000 375 1,500 1,000 130/1oO 115 1LS 12 EA 100 cY 10 SY 5OO MGAL 1 CALC 1LS 1OO HR 1OO SF 50 HR 1LS 4.5 AC 7,700 LF 60 HR 240 HR 260 SY 1LS 1FA 10 EA 1LS 60 LF . 5TON 20 TON 10 SY 649,587 130,190 690,424 29,grL 779,777 77,978 720,335 72,O34 2 7,200 2,988 2,033 4,7tO 5,000 1 4,680 1,000 28,500 44,000 20,000 25,000 968,000 23,300 80,000 30,000 3,125 5 15,000 r,750 77,925 2,000 10,163 760 23,O79 13,000 4,500 5 74,400 500 15,000 r,34O,0rt 1LS 1LS 13 EA 200 cY 10 SY 5OO MGAL 1 CALC 1LS 150 HR 1OO SF 80 HR 1LS 7.5 AC 2,700 LF 60 HR 360 HR 520 SY rLS 1FA 10 EA 1LS 60 LF 5 TON 20 TON 10 sY $ $ s $ I 1 200 250 55,000 1,000 2 300 25 500 1 1LS 3OO HR 100 sF 150 HR 1.52 LS L4.1 AC 2,600 LF 60 HR 480 HR 8OO SY 1LS 1FA 10,000 20,000 6,500 20,000 200 5 10,000 r,7 50 8,963 2,000 5,420 500 tr,775 13,500 4,500 4 9,360 500 15,000 1,250 10,000 6,000 315 1,500 1,000 ¡óo,101 1,340,01 1 160,101 1,500,1 12 150,011 LS L5 EA EA BCY BCY FA CY EA MGAL CALC r55 PAGE 1 18-3007.1 alotlzota - al3tl20ß 0. Agenda Item: Consent Calendar – 8F TO: City Council DATE: October 16, 2018 SUBJECT: 2018 Annual Docket - Approve SUMMARY: In accordance with 12.02.025 Kent City Code, Planning staff coordinates on an annual basis a list (“docket”) of changes suggested by the public or staff to the comprehensive plan and development regulations. The 2018 Annual Docket lists three site-specific requests that will be forwarded to the City Council for action in 2019 and provides a list of other code amendment projects that ECD staff propose to pursue in 2019. EXHIBITS: 2018 Annual Docket RECOMMENDED BY: Economic and Community Development Committee YEA: Boyce, Kaur, Larimer NAY: BUDGET IMPACTS: N/A STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL(S): ☒ Evolving Infrastructure – Connecting people and places through strategic investments in physical and technological infrastructure. ☒ Thriving City - Creating safe neighborhoods, healthy people, vibrant commercial districts, and inviting parks and recreation. ☒ Sustainable Services – Providing quality services through responsible financial management, economic growth, and partnerships. ☒ Inclusive Community - Embracing our diversity and advancing equity through genuine community engagement. MOTION: Approve the 2018 Annual Docket Report as presented by staff. This page intentionally left blank. 2018 Annual Docket Proposal Project Type Comment Zoning Code Amendments Sign Ordinance Compliance (Reed v Gilbert 2015) ECD staff - 2019 Noise Ordinance and Code Enforcement Code Cleanup Housekeeping and clarifying related to violation charges, noise measurement and junk vehicles ECD staff - 2019 Accessory Building Heights/Accessory Dwelling Unit Regulations (includes one request from the public) Code reform to allow taller/larger accessory buildings Regulations were updated in 2015; propose no action at this time (reconsider in 2020 or as part of next Comp Plan update) Residential Building Height Clarify how height is measured ECD staff - 2019 Residential Building Height in SR-8 Zone Code reform to standardize height in single-family zones ECD staff - 2019 Recreation Facilities Standards for Subdivisions Code reform to improve quality of neighborhood park equipment ECD and Parks staff - 2019 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendments 104th Ave SE at 245th St – two parcels, SF-8 to MU Public Request ECD staff – 2019 (addressed concurrently) 12218 SE 288th Pl – four parcels, US to MU Public Request 24700 Military Road (36th Ave S) – one parcel, C to MU Public Request Resolve split designation at 10860 SE 196th St (currently MU, LDMF and MDMF) Housekeeping to resolve ambiguous land use designation Economic Development Amendments (Zoning Code, Land Use Map) Naden Ave Assemblage Explore possible uses ECD staff (with Econ Dev) Highlands Property Explore possible uses OTHER BUSINESS This page intentionally left blank. BIDS This page intentionally left blank. EXECUTIVE SESSION ACTION AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION ADJOURNMENT