Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 10/15/2019
KENT CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS Tuesday, October 15, 2019 7:00 PM Chambers Mayor, Dana Ralph Council President, Bill Boyce Councilmember Brenda Fincher Councilmember Dennis Higgins Councilmember Satwinder Kaur Councilmember Marli Larimer Councilmember Les Thomas Councilmember Toni Troutner ************************************************************** COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 7 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER / FLAG SALUTE 2. ROLL CALL 3. AGENDA APPROVAL Changes from Council, Administration, or Staff. 4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A. Public Recognition 1. Introduction of Incoming Municipal Judge Anthony Gipe 2. Proclamation for TorkLift Central's Ninth Annual Turkey Challenge B. Community Events 1. Team Up 2 Clean Up C. 4th and Willis Roundabout D. Public Safety Report 5. REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES, COUNCIL, AND STAFF A. Mayor's Report B. Chief Administrative Officer's Report C. Councilmember's Reports 6. PUBLIC HEARING A. Second Public Hearing on the 2020 Mid Biennium Budget Adjustment B. Public Hearing on the 2019 Property Tax Levy for the 2020 Budget C. Public Hearing on the 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Plan City Council Meeting City Council Regular Meeting October 15, 2019 D. Public Hearing on the Comprehensive Plan/Capital Facilities Element Amendment and Update to Kent City Code Chapter 12.13, School Impact Fees E. Public Hearing to Consider Declaring Certain Public Utility Equipment and Materials Surplus – Resolution - Adopt 7. PUBLIC COMMENT The Public Comment period is your opportunity to speak to the Council and Mayor on issues that relate to the business of the city of Kent. Comments that do not relate to the business of the city of Kent are not permitted. Additionally, the state of Washington prohibits people from using this Public Comment period to support or oppose a ballot measurement or candidate for office. If you wish to speak to the Mayor or Council, please sign up at the City Clerk’s table adjacent to the podium. When called to speak, please state your name and address for the record. You will have up to three minutes to provide comment. Please address all comments to the Mayor or the Council as a whole. The Mayor and Council may not be in a position to answer questions during the meeting. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Payment of Bills - Approve B. Approval of Minutes 1. City Council Meeting - City Council Special Meeting - Oct 1, 2019 5:00 PM 2. Council Workshop - Workshop Special Meeting - Oct 1, 2019 5:30 PM 3. City Council Meeting - City Council Regular Meeting - Oct 1, 2019 7:00 PM C. Ordinance Eliminating References to Council Committees from the Kent City Code - Adopt D. Bill of Sale to Clear Title at 303 West Meeker Street - Authorize E. 2019 Court Commissioner - Temporary Limited Term Position F. Interlocal Agreement with WSDOT for SR 509 Gateway Project - Authorize G. Veterans Drive Extension PSRC Grant Acceptance - Authorize H. WSDOT Reimbursement Agreement for South 224th - Authorize I. Lake Meridian Park Boathouse Project – Accept as Complete J. Accept the 2019 Crack Sealing Project as Complete - Authorize 9. OTHER BUSINESS 10. BIDS A. Fuel Tank Replacement Project Bid - Award City Council Meeting City Council Regular Meeting October 15, 2019 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION AND ACTION AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION 12. ADJOURNMENT NOTE: A copy of the full agenda is available in the City Clerk's Office and at KentWA.gov. Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City Clerk's Office in advance at 253-856-5725. For TDD relay service, call the Washington Telecommunications Relay Service 7-1-1. PROCLAMATION Whereas, the city of Kent recognizes the importance of proper nutrition for every citizen and that many families in our community are faced with food shoftages; and Whereas, the Kent Food Bank distributes between L,2O0 and 1,500 Thanksgiving baskets to Kent families and the need for donated food is greater than ever; and Whereas,through the generosity of Torklift Central employees, October 7, 2019 marks the kick-off of the Ninth Annual Kent Turkey Challenge that will run through November 18, 2O19; and Whereas,employees of the Torklift Central in Kent, challenge all local businesses to join them in collecting canned goods and frozen turkeys that will be distributed by the Kent Food Bank this holiday season; and Whereas, Whereas, said Thanksgiving baskets will ensure families here in Kent that are dependent upon the Kent Food Bank will receive enough food for their holiday dinner; and t through said generosity of our community, the Kent Food Bank will be able to increase the number of families receiving holiday baskets and ensure the quantities of food are adequate; KENT NOW THEREFORE,I, Dana Ralph, Mayor of Kent, do hereby proclaim October 7 through November t8, 2OL9 as the Ninth Annual Kent Turkey Challenge In the city of Kent, Washington, and encourage all citizens and local businesses to accept the challenge from Torklift Central employees by collecting frozen turkeys and canned goods for the ever-increasing number of families in need here in our community. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of Kent to be affixed this 15th day of October 2019. -t,.'-,' [ /-: ,. t t-t. " " ' I WAsHrNcrox Dana Ralph, M 4.A.2 Packet Pg. 4 Co m m u n i c a t i o n : P r o c l a m a t i o n f o r T o r k L i f t C e n t r a l ' s N i n t h A n n u a l T u r k e y C h a l l e n g e ( P u b l i c R e c o g n i t i o n ) Page 1 of 7 Administration • Thank you for everyone’s patience and flexibility during our offsite city council meetings the last few weeks – especially Facilities, Multimedia, and City Clerk’s Office. We’re excited to be “home”. • We’re putting the finishing touches on the Mayor’s proposed 2020 Legislative Agenda for the City Council’s consideration. As in past years, it will feature a mix of state budget requests and policy ideas. Communications • Dana Neuts is working with our lobbyist, City staff and leadership to finalize the 2020 legislative priorities and policy document for consideration by Kent City Council. She also helped host the employee Town Hall. Nearly 100 employees shared their ideas for what Kent should look like in 10, 20 and 30 years. The next two events will be October 19 and 24. • Kent’s Neighborhood Program received a grant from 4Culture to hire another GIS intern to continue mapping the historical aspects of the City. The intern will work with the GIS supervisor Catherine Crook and City of Kent Landmarks Commissioner Nancy Simpson to choose the next intern in the Mayor’s Office though 2020. Toni Azzola has been selected to sit on the 4Culture Landmarks Capital Grant Panel to review 36 proposed preservation projects throughout King County. • In addition to representing the City of Kent in census outreach for South King County, Uriel Varela has participated in or led a number of different organizations and initiatives including the GARE cohort and the Kent Community Institute (United Parents and Students). Having secured civil rights activist and Presidential Medal of Freedom winner Sylvia Mendez as our first speaker, Uriel is launching the City’s Equity and Inclusion Speaker Series. Mendez will share her amazing story at Green River College on November 14. Rental Housing Inspection Program • 46 of the 68 rental properties in NE Hill have been inspected and 8 more inspections are scheduled, which means 80% of that sector’s properties have taken steps toward compliance. September saw a significant increase in this response rate from 60% to 80%, thanks to diligent outreach by Katie Whaley, RHIP Coordinator. Current Planning • Jonathan Kesler joined the Current Planning team on October 1, filling the position recently vacated by Sara Ullman. Jonathan has 13 years of planning experience from the City of Ellensburg, WA and Dona Ana County, New Mexico. • Current Planning staff have created a new training program composed of multiple 30- minute sessions with various ECD staff members during the first two weeks on the job. So far, this program is working well and providing a structured way to teach ADMINISTRATION ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 5.B Packet Pg. 5 Co m m u n i c a t i o n : C h i e f A d m i n i s t r a t i v e O f f i c e r ' s R e p o r t ( R e p o r t s f r o m S t a n d i n g C o m m i t t e e s , C o u n c i l , a n d S t a f f ) Page 2 of 7 new planners the ins and outs of the complex work we do. Economic Development/Long Range Planning • ECD staff attended a Transit-Oriented Development event in relation to Bus Rapid Transit. Given the Rapid Ride I line project timeline, Kent’s land use designations along the future rapid transit corridor are ripe for a rethink. This event brought together developers, policymakers, and city staff from around the region, and staff came away with many ideas that will likely be a part of the upcoming Comprehensive Plan update. • The final Rally the Valley advisory panel meeting took place September 25, at which staff presented preliminary recommendations for Rally the Valley policy changes, actions, and zoning alternatives. Advisory panel members provided feedback which staff will use in crafting their final recommendations. Development Engineering • The 60% complete FWLE plans from Sound Transit and Kiewit are trickling in and are under review by DE and Planning staff. • DE staff are currently reviewing multiple permits for Boeing’s Kent Space Center project. • Review of the 76th Ave S frontage improvement plans for the Blue Origin project is nearly finished. Improvements include two new mid-block crosswalks to facilitate and increase pedestrian traffic across 76th. • DE staff, Public Works and Parks are collaborating on the Riverbend driving range site and frontage improvements. • DE Staff are continuing to work actively with the Amanda implementation team on the pilot phase of implementation. • Revenues through the 3rd Quarter: ▪ $2,152,005 for Traffic Impact Fees ▪ $1,521,732 for Drainage System Development Charges ▪ $2,100,134 for Water System Development Charges Labor, Class & Compensation • Negotiations with AFSCME and AFSCME Corrections • Class and Comp HCMA track meeting(s) Recruitment • Interviews for the Records Administrator in the City Clerk’s Office October 15-16 • Second interviews for the Administrative Assistant I in Public Works Operations on October 15-16 • Updated Continuous Testing Eligibility Lists for the positions of Corrections Officer and Police Officer • New hires/promotions for October 16: Mai- Khanh Huynh (Records Specialist- PD), Rowena Valencia-Gica (Environmental Supervisor- PW), Samuel Alcorn (TLT Planner- ECD), Jennifer Lund (Records Supervisor- PD) • ECC Technology Update - Ensure updated technology for the City of Kent OEM and test the responsiveness of the ShoreTel emergency notification system. • Fuel Management System Replacement - The City's current Fuel Management System tank has been mandated by the Department of Ecology to be replaced by the end of the year. This would in turn affect Fuel Management Software that is past its useful life expectancy. This project will require the support of IT Infrastructure, Software and custom development integration support and upgrades related to the Public Works Project to implement a fuel management system to replace the City's existing system. • Information Technology operational support for September 24, 2019 to October 08, 2019 ▪ Number of tickets opened – 306 ▪ Number of tickets closed – 294 • Assisted the Police Department in resolving an issue with an individual filming patrons at various locations in the City, including at post offices. • Reviewed the Kent School District School Resource Officer contracts for the Police Department. HUMAN RESOURCES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LAW 5.B Packet Pg. 6 Co m m u n i c a t i o n : C h i e f A d m i n i s t r a t i v e O f f i c e r ' s R e p o r t ( R e p o r t s f r o m S t a n d i n g C o m m i t t e e s , C o u n c i l , a n d S t a f f ) Page 3 of 7 • Prepared a housekeeping ordinance for Administration to eliminate references in the Kent City Code to committees in order to implement the Committee of the Whole process. • Worked with the City of Des Moines to strategize the process for adding Des Moines as a member of the Valley SWAT interlocal group. • Advised the Mayor and Administration regarding an issue related to the Kent Station parking garage. • Prepared an amendment for Administration with regards to the contract for lobbying services with Briahna Murray. • Continued to assist the Clerk’s office with public records requests, and Public Works, ECD, IT and Parks with a number of high priority contracts and development projects, including property rights and access issues involving Naden Avenue. • Assisted the HR Department in a number of sensitive employment and labor related matters. September Update • School Zone Camera tickets: 1,512 filed, $63,092 revenue received • Red Light Camera tickets: 3,814 filed, $98,849 revenue received Recreation • Hogan Park Softball Complex was the venue for the USSSA Men’s & Women’s Western World Softball Tournament held Thursday, September 25 through Sunday, September 29. Over 750 participants on 75 teams from seven states participated in the event. The downtown corridor was filled with participants and spectators enjoying City of Kent area parks, restaurants, and hotels. These events have a significant economic impact on our community. • The Senior Center hosted its annual wellness fair with over 40 vendors providing information about senior related programs and services. FD Cares was on site to provide health screenings and flu shots. Attendees learned about fitness opportunities offered at the senior center. Hundreds of seniors attended. Staff Changes Hiring/Retirement/Recruitment/Leaves/ Promotions • Entry Level Officer Jonathan Jarman started on October 1. • Records Specialist Mai-Khanh Vo Huynh starts on October 16. • Lateral Police Officer Maxwell Neumann from Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office starts on November 1. Significant crime activities/arrests/ investigations • On September 28 officers ultimately arrested a suspect for Assault 4 DV after he fled from the house in a truck. The suspect fled from a traffic stop in his vehicle around the block and back to the victim’s residence then on foot to the back yard. The suspect had cautions for threats to law enforcement including commanding his dog to attack. The suspect was located via K9 track and taken into custody. • On September 28, officers arrested the driver of an occupied stolen vehicle in front of the 7-11 store on Willis St. It was discovered that the driver was bartering arranged prostitution services of females for a $1000 discount on the vehicle’s price. Officers and detectives were able to connect the prostitute named in this exchange as possibly being involved in a previous theft of a motor vehicle at the Crossland apartments. • On October 1, officers were dispatched to the reports of shots fired at 3921 271st Place. The occupants there have a history of anti-police behavior and mental health issues. SWAT was called out and the suspect eventually exited and was taken into custody without incident. • On October 2, dispatch advised of a motorcycle v truck collision in the area of Willis and Washington or 167. Numerous traffic units arrived within two minutes and found a motorcyclist had struck a truck as MUNICIPAL COURT PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY SERVICES POLICE 5.B Packet Pg. 7 Co m m u n i c a t i o n : C h i e f A d m i n i s t r a t i v e O f f i c e r ' s R e p o r t ( R e p o r t s f r o m S t a n d i n g C o m m i t t e e s , C o u n c i l , a n d S t a f f ) Page 4 of 7 the truck was turning to get onto SB 167 from Willis. Life-saving efforts undertaken on the motorcyclist were unsuccessful. The driver of the truck did not appear to be under the influence of any substance. The driver of the truck reported having a flashing yellow arrow, but it is believed the motorcyclist was traveling at an excessive speed. • On October 5, in the Circle K parking lot at 102nd and 240th, a white vehicle pulled in and the passenger pointed a gun at a victim and told him to drop his backpack and walk away, which he did. The suspect got out and took the backpack. Then officers found the vehicle at 116th and 240th and detained four suspects. Two suspects were positively ID’ d. A gun could be seen in the vehicle as well as the victim’s backpack. • On October 6, the traffic unit was called out for a collision which occurred at 116th and Kent Kangley. Unit 1 made a left hand turn on a green, turning in front of unit 2. The two units collided in an off-set head on fashion and a motorcyclist, unit 3, collided with the rear of unit 2. A nine-year-old in unit 2 received a large laceration to his forehead and was transported to Harborview. The driver of unit 1 was intoxicated and provided a portable breath test which yielded a .332 and was also taken to the hospital due to injuries. Major emphasis patrol • Operation Clear Track (Railroad Emphasis) data from September 24th: ▪ 27 Citations ▪ 4 Verbal Warnings ▪ 1 Arrest Letters of Commendation • Commander Mike O’Reilly and Officer Joe Mello were given Letters of Commendation for their excellent testimony at the House Civil Rights and Judiciary Committee meeting in Olympia on April 2, 2019. They only had three days to prepare but they willingly agreed to attend the meeting and testify. The meeting was in regard to a bill dealing with the homeless. Steve Strachan, WASPC Director, stated “We are deeply appreciative of your willingness to provide your knowledge and insight.” • Officer Adam Ferguson was commended for his investigation on a burglary that occurred at the Riverwood Apartments. Officer Ferguson was successful in getting most of the property back for the victim in Renton as well as in Kent. Officer Ferguson's ability to talk with people, gain their trust and to get confessions has shown to be exemplary. Officer Ferguson continues to represent the values the City of Kent and the Kent Police Department are looking for. • Officers Morris and Berry were commended for their outstanding work to find and arrest three suspects that were wanted on a string of armed robberies. Their dedication to their job by reading crime bulletins and retaining the information for when they hit the street allowed for this arrest. • Assistant Chief Kasner, Commander Rob Scholl, Sergeant Jason Bishop, Officers Chris Bigler, Dave Ghaderi, Jeremiah Johnson, Doug Westcott and Multimedia’s Josh Gonzalez were commended for volunteering to be part of a committee to design a new patch. A couple of meetings were held, multiple designs were worked on and many emails reviewing patch designs occurred over the next year. The department now has a patch that incorporates both the present and past of Kent and will be proudly displayed by all officers on their uniforms and vehicles. • Records Specialists Jennifer Arnold & Kristina Wortman were commended for exceptional work and initiative in their assignment in the Records Unit. Recently a firearm purchase was denied to what turned out to be a potentially dangerous person who was threatening, among others, the President of the United States. This same subject was later arrested by the FBI, for threats. Land Survey & GIS • Survey field staff are busy with construction staking needed for 224th Phase II, the 228th Grade Separation and the Upper Mill Creek Dam projects. Survey PUBLIC WORKS 5.B Packet Pg. 8 Co m m u n i c a t i o n : C h i e f A d m i n i s t r a t i v e O f f i c e r ' s R e p o r t ( R e p o r t s f r o m S t a n d i n g C o m m i t t e e s , C o u n c i l , a n d S t a f f ) Page 5 of 7 field staff are extremely busy with completing numerous requests for design topography and construction staking. Survey Party Chiefs and the Assistant City Surveyor have been extremely busy with resolving engineering inconsistencies and lack of information on certain project design plans currently under construction. The GIS/Survey technician is updating Water Meter, Water Valve and Backflow assembly locations in the field and related databases. • GIS staff continue with transferring data to layer files for easy accessibility on various web applications as well as entering infrastructure as-built data. The GIS intern for PW Signs department has collected 9,051 signs city wide so far this year. Senior GIS Analyst is working to complete 2020 Census Addressing for the October deadline and providing data for public records requests as needed. The GIS Supervisor and Manager have met with PSRFA, Utility Billing, Police and IT regarding updating addressing work flow communications and GIS road centerline data sharing processes. Up-to-date addressing and centerline data is necessary for supporting multiple departmental functions including Fire, Life & Safety. Construction • LID 363: S 224th St Improvements – 88th Ave S / S 218th St Improvements – S 222nd St to 94th Pl S (Ph 2): Cast-in-place (CIP) concrete retaining wall construction on 218th St is scheduled for the next pour on Thursday this week. Installation of the headwalls has been delayed due to a manufacturing issue. Partial backfill of the culvert has been completed. S 218th St from 93rd to 94th Pl closed in July and is expected to reopen this Fall. • 228th St. Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation Ground Improvements and Embankments (Ph 4 of 5): West side fill for vertical walls is now underway on the East side of the project. Water main installation on the East side of the UPRR tracks is ongoing. The full closure of S 228th St from 72nd Ave S to 76th Ave S (4th Ave N) with detour will be in place for approximately 2 years. The Interurban trail is temporarily open for use, and will remain open for the next 2-3 months. There is no access to either direction of S 228th St. from the trail outside of the fenced pathway as this is an active construction site. • 228th St. Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation Bridge and Roadway (Ph 5 of 5): Sewer pipe installation in the intersection of 228th and 76th is scheduled to take place next week. A traffic alert will be posted for this work. • East Valley Highway Pavement Preservation – S 180th St to S 190th St: The replacement of several sewer manhole lids has been added to this contract. The contractor is procuring the materials and this work will proceed within the next couple of weeks. • Upper Mill Creek Dam Improvements and Diversion Structure Replacement: The 104th Ave S closure will remain in place for the next several weeks. PSE is on site this week reinstalling their gas main that has been relocated to facilitate our construction in 104th Ave. • Green River Natural Resource Area (GRNRA) Storm Water Force Main: Large diameter storm pipe installation is complete with the exception of the connection to the existing catch basin on Russell Rd. This connection is scheduled to take place in late October. • Willis St & 4th Ave S Roundabout Joint Utility Trench: Contract work is proceeding this week. Message boards are in place for notification. Transportation • As part of our outreach for the Transportation Master Plan, a web map for interested stakeholders and residents to request transportation projects went live on October 1. Interested parties can propose transportation projects. These proposed projects will then be added to the project list. Projects will then be screened, evaluated against the transportation goals, and possibly advance to become TMP projects. ▪ Transportation worked with the Signs and Markings group in PW Operations to change signing on Jason Ave at James St to provide more notification that trucks are not allowed on Jason Ave. The majority of the trucks driving 5.B Packet Pg. 9 Co m m u n i c a t i o n : C h i e f A d m i n i s t r a t i v e O f f i c e r ' s R e p o r t ( R e p o r t s f r o m S t a n d i n g C o m m i t t e e s , C o u n c i l , a n d S t a f f ) Page 6 of 7 on Jason Ave between James St and Smith St are traveling southbound. ▪ Transportation worked with Streets group in PW Operations to pour new foundations for two street lights at Reith Rd/Lk Fenwick Rd. The street lights should be completed in the next two weeks. • The Mayor, the City Engineer, and Transportation staff met with WSDOT to talk about the possibility of a new traffic signal on Washington Ave at K-Mart and Safeway. Washington Ave is State Route 181 and WSDOT has sole approval authority for all traffic signals and roadway modifications. The meeting was productive. Our next step is to meet with staff from the local WSDOT region to discuss traffic analysis needs. • Staff modified the traffic signal timing on the East Hill in preparation of implementing a new traffic signal subgroup. The new subgroup will include the signalized intersections between 111th Ave SE & Kent- Kangley Rd and 101st Ave SE & SE 256th St. New signal timing will be implemented in the group to facilitate KC Metro Route 1514 transit project. An additional benefit to this change is improved traffic flow outside of commute hours. Design • 212th East Valley Highway to 72nd: Preparing outreach information to share with emergency services and nearby businesses. Received permits from both UPRR and BNSF. • 4th and Willis Roundabout and Joint Utility Relocation projects: Preparing final channelization plans to submit to WSDOT. WSDOT not in favor of concept for emergency signals. Preparing information for Public Open House on Nov 7 and coordinating with Communications team for messaging. WSDOT processing documents to revise Limited Access to Manage Access. • Meet Me on Meeker Projects: ▪ Complete Street (TIB funded), Frontage and site improvements at Parks driving range – team defined schedule to meet ‘opening’ day for driving range means that the project must be advertised Nov 12. 60% review will be sent out this week, comments due Oct 18. ▪ Meeker Frontage improvements from Russell to GRE development (PSRC funds) design concurrent to above project. • 76th Street Projects: ▪ Road Raising – complete streets memo prepared and in review. Working with Right-of-Way team in securing Temporary Construction Permits for work on private properties. Coordinating with adjacent 212th Overlay project to interconnect City utilities (water). Design in progress. ▪ Flood Protection – working through permitting process. ▪ Road Raising/Flood Protection – request utilities to pothole conflict locations. Over 100 identified between the two projects on the corridor. Streets • Street Maintenance crews are doing hot patch repairs on 84th Ave S, E Meeker St, and on Garfield Ave S, performing sidewalk inspections in the downtown core area and filling potholes at various locations throughout the City. They are also preparing for winter by equipping trucks with sanders and plows. The Concrete crew will be preparing and pouring concrete for a new street light base on Reith Rd and for an ADA ramp, curb, gutter, strip form and sidewalk on E Meeker St. • The Street Signs and Markings team are maintaining signs on the East and West Hill, removing signs on 129th Ave SE and S 249th St, installing bases at SE 211th St, 42nd Ave SE, and on 30th Ave S, doing sign inventory for Geographic Information Systems (GIS) on 114th Ave SE and turning the “Watch for Ice” signs at various locations throughout the City. The Retro Reflectivity crew is locating signs on SE 241st St and on SE 264th St, and installing bases and signs on SE 269th St, 114th Ave SE and on SE 271st St. The Solid Waste crews will be removing debris and illegal signs on Hwy 99, S 277th St, 132nd Ave SE and on Kent Kangley Rd, painting the sound wall on S 228th St and installing a garbage can for Downtown Partnership on 1st Ave S. 5.B Packet Pg. 10 Co m m u n i c a t i o n : C h i e f A d m i n i s t r a t i v e O f f i c e r ' s R e p o r t ( R e p o r t s f r o m S t a n d i n g C o m m i t t e e s , C o u n c i l , a n d S t a f f ) Page 7 of 7 • Vegetation crews will be performing maintenance at Kent water sites and drainage areas City wide. Street Vegetation is working on maintenance in the alleys between 2nd Ave N and 3rd Ave N, along the road of SE 256th St and on the people paths on 119th Ave SE in the Panther Lake area and in the East Hill area near SE 264th St. Our sidearm mowers will be working on SE 192nd St and adjacent roadways in the Panther Lake area, on S 272nd St and adjacent roadways in the West Hill area and on SE Kent Kangley Rd and adjacent roadways in the East Hill area. Wetland Maintenance crews will be performing maintenance at various wetland and drainage locations and Wetland Mitigation crews are doing some planting and weeding at Alvin’s Pond, staging plants at the Green River Natural Resource Area nursery, line trim and prepare for planting at the Leber and weeding and line trim around plants on Frager Rd. The spray truck will be spraying on SE 256th St to finish off the season. Water • Staff have completed a water main installation on the West Hill at S 252nd Pl and are now installing the new water services for the customers. Our leak detection program for 2019 kicks off the week of October 7th. This year we will survey the West Hill water system and project it will take two weeks to complete. Dead end water main flushing is also under way. Annually we move water through portions of the system that are not looped to maintain water quality. Storm • Storm crews will be installing catch basins and then putting asphalt around them, digging and reinforcing ditches and installing pipe on E Chicago St, extending the Lake Meridian outfall on SE 266th St, performing a manhole frame and lid change out on 108th Ave SE and cleaning lines in advance of the TV Truck on SE 212th Pl, 104th Ave SE and on Benson Rd SE removing debris from the pipe so that clear video can be taken of the structure’s interior. Additionally, crews will be pumping sediment from sumps in storm structures at SE 272nd Pl and at 108th Ave SE, then assessing at 114th Ave SE and at Maple Ln for structural and water quality integrity as well as making repairs and installing Rip Rap around culvert ends on SE 218th Pl per the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) federal guidelines. Sewer • Sewer crews are cleaning the Frager sewer basin on Veterans Dr N, cleaning the check valve at Horseshoe Sanitary, performing a manhole frame and lid change out on 104th Ave SE and on SE 270th St and taking inventory of easements on East Hill and West Hill. They are also TV inspecting the storm and sewer systems on 68th Ave S and on W James St by camera and cleaning existing sewer lines that are 10 years or older at various locations throughout the City. Fleet/Warehouse • Fleet is repairing the rear brakes on a Vactor, repairing the Side Arm mower heads, rebuilding the spare heads as needed and ordering new vehicles. They are also preparing snow equipment for the winter and repairing seasonal equipment such as mowers, pavers, backhoes, vactors, trailers and dump trucks; along with normal equipment repairs. The Radio Shop will be testing for signal loss after moving the antenna at Tank 5. • Warehouse staff continue with CDL training, fulfilling work orders, maintaining supply levels and repairing small equipment. # # # 5.B Packet Pg. 11 Co m m u n i c a t i o n : C h i e f A d m i n i s t r a t i v e O f f i c e r ' s R e p o r t ( R e p o r t s f r o m S t a n d i n g C o m m i t t e e s , C o u n c i l , a n d S t a f f ) DATE: October 15, 2019 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Second Public Hearing on the 2020 Mid Biennium Budget Adjustment SUMMARY: This is the second public hearing on the Mid Biennium Budget Adjustment. The proposed budget can be found at <https://www.kentwa.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=12664> and is also available in the City Clerk’s Office. SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Inclusive Community, Thriving City, Evolving Infrastructure, Innovative Government, Sustainable Services 6.A Packet Pg. 12 DATE: October 15, 2019 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Public Hearing on the 2019 Property Tax Levy for the 2020 Budget SUMMARY: This is the public hearing on the 2019 Property Tax Levy for the 2020 budget. Estimated property tax levied against the assessed value of the property in the City of Kent, Washington, a tax for the City's 2020 budget in the following amount for the General Fund, for the purpose of paying the general expenses of municipal government: Levy per $1,000 of assessed valuation Fund (estimated) Dollar Amount General Fund $1.3882 $31,408,457 This property tax levy represents a 1.0% increase over last year as shown below. 2020 Regular Property Tax Levy $31,408,457 Less 2019 Regular Property Tax Levy (30,786,276) Less New Construction Levy (314,318) Less Refund Levy 0 Property Tax Increase $ 307,863 % Change 1.0% 6.B Packet Pg. 13 Property Tax AV & Rates City of Kent Share Only 2018 2019 2020 Est Assessed Valuation in thousands (A) $ 18,528,081 $ 20,495,751 $ 22,625,773 General Levy Rate ($2.325 max) (B) 1.62704 1.49065 1.38820 Estimated Cost On: Median Home Value (C) $527 $541 $529 (A) Assessed valuation for 2020 is estimated to increase by 5% from 2019. (B) 2018 & 2019 Levy Rates per King County Assessor's Office. (C) 2018 and 2019 median home values are $324,000 and $363,000, respectively, per King County Assessor's Office. 2020 is estimated to increase by 5 percent. SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Inclusive Community, Thriving City, Evolving Infrastructure, Innovative Government, Sustainable Services 6.B Packet Pg. 14 DATE: October 15, 2019 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Public Hearing on the 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Plan SUMMARY: This is the public hearing on the 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Plan. SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Inclusive Community, Thriving City, Evolving Infrastructure, Innovative Government, Sustainable Services ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program (PDF) 6.C Packet Pg. 15 2020-2025 Pg October 1, 2019 6.C.a Packet Pg. 16 At t a c h m e n t : 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( 2 0 1 1 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n ) 2 20 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C A P I T A L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O G R A M | CI T Y O F K E N T , W A S H I N G T O N 6.C.a Packet Pg. 17 At t a c h m e n t : 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( 2 0 1 1 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n ) 20 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C A P I T A L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O G R A M | CI T Y O F K E N T , W A S H I N G T O N 3 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2020-2025 SUMMARY PROJECTS AND FUNDING Capital project costs for the City’s 2020-2025 capital planning period total $181.2 million and are funded with City, utility and other resources, as illustrated in the following tables. Additional details follow. SU M M A R Y City Resources 49% Utility Resources 51% Sources of Funds General Government 7% Parks, Rec & Comm Services 15% Transportation 25% Utilities 51% Projects by Category Summary Sources 2020 2021 2022-2025 Total City Resources 24,367$ 13,880$ 50,570$ 88,817$ Utility Resources 14,135 14,715 63,301 92,151 Other Resources 257 257 Total - in thousands 38,759$ 28,595$ 113,871$ 181,225$ Summary Costs 2020 2021 2022-2025 Total General Government 5,912$ 1,550$ 6,200$ 13,662$ Parks, Rec & Comm Services 10,974 4,850 14,609 30,433 Public Safety 100 100 Transportation 7,638 7,480 29,761 44,879 Utilities 14,135 14,715 63,301 92,151 Total - in thousands 38,759$ 28,595$ 113,871$ 181,225$ 6.C.a Packet Pg. 18 At t a c h m e n t : 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( 2 0 1 1 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n ) 4 20 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C A P I T A L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O G R A M | CI T Y O F K E N T , W A S H I N G T O N CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OPERATING IMPACT OF MAJOR CIP PROJECTS The impact of a capital project on the operating budget is a key factor in considering the inclusion of a project in the six-year plan. The operating costs of a project, and any savings resulting from the project, are captured in the Operating Budget. SOURCES OF FUNDS—in thousands SO U R C E S O F F U N D S 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total Sources of Funds City Resources 24,367$ 13,880$ 12,580$ 12,629$ 12,634$ 12,727$ 88,817$ Utility Resources 14,135 14,715 15,669 16,245 15,637 15,750 92,151 Other Resources 257 257 Total Sources of Funds 38,759$ 28,595$ 28,249$ 28,874$ 28,271$ 28,477$ 181,225$ 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total City Resources Criminal Justice Fund 545$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 545$ Business & Occupation Tax 6,994 7,445 7,415 7,385 7,355 7,355 43,949 CRF General 12,010 1,750 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 20,160 CRF REET 2 380 620 517 585 607 700 3,409 CRF REET 2 Fund Balance 1,600 1,030 2,630 Golf Fund 1,294 1,294 Sale of Land (1,500) (1,500) Solid Waste Utility Tax 3,044 3,035 3,048 3,059 3,072 3,072 18,330 Total City Resources 24,367 13,880 12,580 12,629 12,634 12,727 88,817 Utility Resources Drainage Revenues 5,371 5,605 5,957 5,944 5,925 5,968 34,770 Sewer Revenues 3,187 3,177 3,169 3,153 3,140 3,163 18,989 Water Revenues 5,577 5,933 6,543 7,148 6,572 6,619 38,392 Total Utility Resources 14,135 14,715 15,669 16,245 15,637 15,750 92,151 Other Resources PEG Fees 57 57 KC Levy 200 - - - - - 200 Total Other Resources 257 - - - - - 257 Total Sources of Funds 38,759$ 28,595$ 28,249$ 28,874$ 28,271$ 28,477$ 181,225$ 6.C.a Packet Pg. 19 At t a c h m e n t : 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( 2 0 1 1 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n ) 20 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C A P I T A L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O G R A M | CI T Y O F K E N T , W A S H I N G T O N 5 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY BY SOURCE 2020-2025 2020-21 SOURCES BY TYPE SO U R C E S O F F U N D S $- $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 $ in Thousands City Resources Utility Resources Other Resources Criminal Justice Fund - 1% Business & Occupation Tax 18% CRF General 30% CRF REET 2 - 1% CRF REET 2 Fund Balance 4% Golf Fund 3% Solid Waste Utility Tax 9% Drainage Revenues 13% Sewer Revenues 8% Water Revenues 14% Other 9% 6.C.a Packet Pg. 20 At t a c h m e n t : 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( 2 0 1 1 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n ) 6 20 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C A P I T A L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O G R A M | CI T Y O F K E N T , W A S H I N G T O N CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECTS—in thousands PR O J E C T S B Y C A T E G O R Y 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total Projects General Government 5,912$ 1,550$ 1,550$ 1,550$ 1,550$ 1,550$ 13,662$ Parks, Rec & Comm Services 10,974 4,850 3,567 3,635 3,657 3,750 30,433 Public Safety 100 100 Transportation 7,638 7,480 7,463 7,444 7,427 7,427 44,879 Utilities 14,135 14,715 15,669 16,245 15,637 15,750 92,151 Total Projects 38,759$ 28,595$ 28,249$ 28,874$ 28,271$ 28,477$ 181,225$ 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total General Government accesso ShoWare Center 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 1,800$ Facilities 2,620 2,620 Technology 2,992 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 9,242 Total General Government 5,912 1,550 1,550 1,550 1,550 1,550 13,662 Parks, Rec & Comm Services Golf 1,294 200 50 50 50 50 1,694 Parks and Recreation 9,680 4,650 3,517 3,585 3,607 3,700 28,739 Total Parks, Rec & Comm Svcs 10,974 4,850 3,567 3,635 3,657 3,750 30,433 Transportation Site Improvements 7,638 7,480 7,463 7,444 7,427 7,427 44,879 Total Transportation 7,638 7,480 7,463 7,444 7,427 7,427 44,879 Public Safety Crime Scene Van Ugrade/Storage 100 - - - - - 100 Total Public Safety 100 - - - - - 100 Utilities Water Supply & Distribution 3,187 3,177 3,169 3,153 3,140 3,750 19,576 Sewer 5,371 5,605 5,957 5,944 5,925 6,000 34,802 Stormwater Management 5,577 5,933 6,543 7,148 6,572 6,000 37,773 Total Utilities 14,135 14,715 15,669 16,245 15,637 15,750 92,151 Total Projects 38,759$ 28,595$ 28,249$ 28,874$ 28,271$ 28,477$ 181,225$ 6.C.a Packet Pg. 21 At t a c h m e n t : 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( 2 0 1 1 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n ) 20 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C A P I T A L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O G R A M | CI T Y O F K E N T , W A S H I N G T O N 7 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY BY CATEGORY 2020-2025 2020-2021 BY CATEGORY FUNCTION PR O J E C T S B Y C A T E G O R Y $- $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 $ in Thousands General Government Parks, Rec & Comm Services Transportation Utilities accesso ShoWare Center - 1% Facilities 7% Technology 8% Golf 3% Parks and Recreation 25% Public Safety < 1% Transportation 20% Water Supply & Distribution 8% Sewer 14% Stormwater Management 14% Other 4% 6.C.a Packet Pg. 22 At t a c h m e n t : 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( 2 0 1 1 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n ) 8 20 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C A P I T A L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O G R A M | CI T Y O F K E N T , W A S H I N G T O N CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM GENERAL GOVERNMENT—in thousands GE N E R A L G O V E R N M E N T 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total Sources of Funds CRF General 5,310$ 1,550$ 1,550$ 1,550$ 1,550$ 1,550$ 13,060$ Criminal Justice Fund 545 545 PEG Fees 57 57 Total Sources of Funds 5,912 1,550 1,550 1,550 1,550 1,550 13,662 Projects Facilities City Buildings 2,000 2,000 Law Office Cubical Conversion 50 50 Corrections Emergency Backup Generator 350 350 Police Workspace Reconfiguration 150 150 Security Fence at Corrections/Court 70 - - - - - 70 Total Facilities Projects 2,620 - - - - - 2,620 accesso ShoWare Center Building Extension for Storage 100 100 Carpet (Admin) 20 20 Carpet (T-Birds) 31 31 Ice Deck 13 13 Magnetometer Walk through Metal Detectors 16 16 Wi Fi 120 120 Unallocated - 300 300 300 300 300 1,500 Total accesso ShoWare Center 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 1,800$ 6.C.a Packet Pg. 23 At t a c h m e n t : 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( 2 0 1 1 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n ) 20 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C A P I T A L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O G R A M | CI T Y O F K E N T , W A S H I N G T O N 9 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM GENERAL GOVERNMENT CONTINUED—in thousands GE N E R A L G O V E R N M E N T 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total Technology HLC 17-18 Mobile Router Replacement - 20$ 22$ 24$ 27$ 27$ 120$ HLC 17-18 Server Replacement 50 50 60 67 73 73 373 HLC 17-18 Telephony 100 30 30 35 35 35 265 HLC 17-18 Wireless Infrastructure Refresh 20 22 24 27 27 120 HLC 21-24 Connected Conference Room 25 28 30 62 62 207 HLC16-18 Data Center 75 80 90 100 110 110 565 HLC16-18 Network Refresh 50 60 63 69 69 311 HLC16-18 Security 200 140 143 153 150 150 936 HLC16-18 Storage Expansion 30 33 36 40 40 179 HLC16-18 UPS 25 30 30 33 37 37 192 HLC16-18 Virtualization Infrastructure Refresh 75 82 91 100 100 448 SLC18-20 Admin System Replacement Reserves 88 20 20 20 20 20 188 SLC18-21 Law System Replacement Reserves 104 100 30 30 30 30 324 SLC18-21 PD System Replacement Reserves 1,135 250 150 144 140 140 1,959 SLC18-22 HR System Replacement Reserves 53 20 20 20 20 20 153 SLC18-23 Fin System Replacement Reserves 200 70 130 120 70 70 660 SLC18-26 PRCS System Replacement Reserves 67 30 30 30 30 30 217 SLC18-26 PW System Replacement Reserves 113 50 110 70 50 50 443 SLC18-27 Court System Replacement Reserves 37 30 30 30 30 30 187 SLC18-27 ECD System Replacement Reserves 243 50 50 50 50 50 493 SLC18-28 Clerk System Replacement Reserves 113 60 60 60 60 60 413 SLC18-29 IT System Replacement Reserves 67 20 20 20 20 20 167 PEG Projects 57 57 Collaboration Tool Procurement 50 50 Jail Camera Infrastructure Update 75 75 Network Resiliency 60 60 Network Pen Testing 80 - - - - - 80 Total Technology Projects 2,992 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 9,242 Total General Government Projects 5,912$ 1,550$ 1,550$ 1,550$ 1,550$ 1,550$ 13,662$ 6.C.a Packet Pg. 24 At t a c h m e n t : 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( 2 0 1 1 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n ) 10 20 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C A P I T A L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O G R A M | CI T Y O F K E N T , W A S H I N G T O N CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES—in thousands PA R K S 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total Sources of Funds CRF REET2 380$ 620$ 517$ 585$ 607$ 700$ 3,409$ REET2 Fund Balance 1,600 1,030 2,630 B&O Square Footage 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 18,000 Grants 200 200 Golf Fund Balance 1,294 1,294 CRF General 6,000 200 50 50 50 50 6,400 Sale of Land (1,500) (1,500) Total Sources of Funds 10,974 4,850 3,567 3,635 3,657 3,750 30,433 Projects Golf Projects Golf Clubhouse Renovations 34 34 Golf Course Accessories 100 100 Golf Course Renovations/Improvements 510 100 50 50 50 50 810 Golf Irrigation System Upgrades 650 100 - - - - 750 Total Golf Projects 1,294 200 50 50 50 50 1,694 6.C.a Packet Pg. 25 At t a c h m e n t : 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( 2 0 1 1 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n ) 20 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C A P I T A L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O G R A M | CI T Y O F K E N T , W A S H I N G T O N 11 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES CONTINUED—in thousands PA R K S 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total Parks and Recreation Projects Campus Park Improvements 200 300 500 Chestnut Ridge Park Renovation 100 200 300 Clark Lake Park Development 240th 150 250 500 800 1,000 2,700 Downtown Parks Master Plan 350 350 Downtown Parks Phase 1 500 500 500 1,500 Eastridge Park Renovation 100 350 450 Gateways 250 250 Hogan Park at Russell Road Reno. Ph 2 150 500 650 Kherson Park Redevelopment 500 500 KVLT - Old Fishing Hole Improvements 50 300 350 KVLT - Boeing Rock Improvements 50 300 350 KVLT - Phase 2 Improvements 250 250 250 250 250 200 1,450 KVLT - Riverview Park Phase 2 200 500 700 Kent Memorial Park Turf Conversion 2,000 2,000 Lake Fenwick Park Renovation - Phase 2 130 150 1,000 1,000 2,280 Meet Me on Meeker Riverbend (Driving Range) 500 500 Mill Creek Earthworks Renovation 100 250 850 1,000 2,200 Mill Creek Trail Renovation 250 250 850 500 1,850 Mill Creek Canyon Cleanup 400 400 Panther Lake Park Phase 1 150 150 Parks Land Acquisition 500 500 500 250 500 500 2,750 Park Orchard Park Improvements 50 450 500 Parks Planning and Design 50 50 67 50 57 50 324 Riverview Park Development 1,000 1,000 Salt Air Vista Park Renovation 250 250 Scenic Hill Park Renovation 100 350 450 Springwood Park Renovation 1,700 1,000 2,700 Sun Meadows Park Improvements 35 450 485 West Fenwick Park Phase 2 200 200 4th & Willis Greenway Design 400 400 Willis Greenways Improvements 250 - - - - - 250 Total Parks and Recreation Projects 9,680 4,650 3,517 3,585 3,607 3,700 28,739 Total Projects 10,974$ 4,850$ 3,567$ 3,635$ 3,657$ 3,750$ 30,433$ 6.C.a Packet Pg. 26 At t a c h m e n t : 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( 2 0 1 1 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n ) 12 20 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C A P I T A L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O G R A M | CI T Y O F K E N T , W A S H I N G T O N CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TR A N S P O R T A T I O N TRANSPORTATION—in thousands 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total Sources of Funds Solid Waste Utility Tax 3,044$ 3,035$ 3,048$ 3,059$ 3,072$ 3,072$ 18,330$ Business & Occupation Tax 3,994 4,445 4,415 4,385 4,355 4,355 25,949 CRF 600 600 Total Sources of Funds 7,638 7,480 7,463 7,444 7,427 7,427 44,879 Projects B&O In-house Overlays 250 250 250 250 250 250 1,500 B&O Street Contracted 2,944 3,505 3,598 3,560 3,523 3,523 20,653 Meet Me on Meeker Promenade - 64th to Kent Elem.600 600 Panther Lake Signal System Integration 400 400 Residential Street Contracted 2,794 3,145 3,165 3,184 3,204 3,204 18,696 Residential Street Capital 250 250 250 250 250 250 1,500 Street Lights - New 200 200 200 200 200 200 1,200 Traffic Cameras - New (Capital) 130 130 Transportation Master Plan 200 200 Total Projects 7,638$ 7,480$ 7,463$ 7,444$ 7,427$ 7,427$ 44,879$ 6.C.a Packet Pg. 27 At t a c h m e n t : 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( 2 0 1 1 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n ) 20 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C A P I T A L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O G R A M | CI T Y O F K E N T , W A S H I N G T O N 13 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM UT I L I T I E S UTILITIES—in thousands 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total Sources of Funds Water Revenues 5,577$ 5,933$ 6,543$ 7,148$ 6,572$ 6,619$ 38,392$ Sewer Revenues 3,187 3,177 3,169 3,153 3,140 3,163 18,989 Drainage Revenues 5,371 5,605 5,957 5,944 5,925 5,968 34,770 Total Sources of Funds 14,135 14,715 15,669 16,245 15,637 15,750 92,151 Projects Water Supply & Distribution E. Hill Pressure Zone 1,500 1,000 2,000 4,500 Emergency Power 212th 200 200 Garrison O'Brien Treatment Plant 1,000 1,000 Guiberson Reservior Repair 1,500 1,000 3,000 4,500 10,000 Habitat Conservation Plan Implementation 413 420 242 250 256 1,581 Kent Springs Well Rehab 75 75 Landsburg Mine 804 466 1,063 2,333 Misc Water Improvements 500 500 500 500 500 2,500 Pump Station #4 Upgrade 500 500 Reservoir Maintenance & Improvements 500 500 Security Improvements on Water Sites - 28 50 50 31 50 209 Tacoma Pipeline 50 50 50 50 50 50 300 Water Generators 1,000 1,000 2,000 Water Main Repairs/Replacements 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 3,365 8,365 Water System PLC Upgrades 35 35 35 35 35 35 210 Wellhead Protection 200 200 200 200 200 200 1,200 West Hill Reservoir - - 500 1,000 - 800 2,300 Total Water Supply & Distribution 5,577 5,933 6,543 7,148 6,572 6,000 37,773 Sewer Derbyshire 500 2,677 3,177 Misc. Pump Station Replacements 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 4,000 Misc. Sewer 500 500 500 500 500 750 3,250 Sewer Main Replacements/Relining 1,669 1,653 1,640 2,000 6,962 Skyline Sewer Interceptor 2,187 - - - - - 2,187 Total Sewer 3,187$ 3,177$ 3,169$ 3,153$ 3,140$ 3,750$ 19,576$ 6.C.a Packet Pg. 28 At t a c h m e n t : 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( 2 0 1 1 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n ) 14 20 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C A P I T A L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O G R A M | CI T Y O F K E N T , W A S H I N G T O N CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM UT I L I T I E S UTILITIES CONTINUED—in thousands 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total Stormwater Management 144th Ave Drainage Improvements -$ 250$ 250$ 2,000$ -$ -$ 2,500$ County Road 8 200 200 Downey Farmstead 250 250 Drainage Master Plan 500 300 800 Frager Rd Levee 200 200 400 GRNRA Maint. Improvements 250 1,000 2,000 3,250 GRNRA Pump Station 250 1,000 1,000 1,000 4,375 2,500 10,125 GRNRA S Pump Station - Kent Airport Levee 100 100 200 Lower Russell Road Levee 250 250 Mill Creek @ 76th Ave Flood Protection 1,000 1,000 Mill/Garrison/Spring/Green River & Tributaries 250 500 750 Milwaukee II Levee 100 100 Misc Drainage 300 300 300 300 300 500 2,000 N Fork Meridian Valley Culvert 300 1,000 1,300 Pipe Replacements/Roadway Improvements 821 500 907 644 1,000 2,500 6,372 Upper MIll Creek Dam 500 500 Valley Channel Rehabilitation 500 1,705 2,500 4,705 Valley Crk System Condition Letter of Map Revision 100 - - - - - 100 Total Stormwater Management 5,371 5,605 5,957 5,944 5,925 6,000 34,802 Total Utilities Projects 14,135$ 14,715$ 15,669$ 16,245$ 15,637$ 15,750$ 92,151$ PUBLIC SAFETY 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total Sources of Funds CRF 100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100$ Total Sources of Funds 100 - - - - - 100 Projects Requested Crime Scene Van Ugrade/Storage 100 - - - - - 100 Total Public Safety Projects 100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100$ 6.C.a Packet Pg. 29 At t a c h m e n t : 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( 2 0 1 1 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 2 5 C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n ) DATE: October 15, 2019 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Public Hearing on the Comprehensive Plan/Capital Facilities Element Amendment and Update to Kent City Code Chapter 12.13, School Impact Fees SUMMARY: This is the public hearing on the Comprehensive Plan/Capital Facilities Element Amendment and Update to Kent City code Chapter 12.13, School Impact Fees. SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Inclusive Community, Thriving City, Evolving Infrastructure, Innovative Government, Sustainable Services ATTACHMENTS: 1. School District Capital Facilities Plans _ General Statistics Table (PDF) 2. Ordinance Amending Comp Plan Amend-School District Capital Facilities Plans (PDF) 3. Impact Fees History 2000 (PDF) 4. Ordinance School Impact Fees 2019-2020 Final (PDF) 6.D Packet Pg. 30 School District Capital Facilities Plans General Statistics School District: Kent Federal Way Auburn Highline Student Generation Rates Si n g l e -Fa m i l y Elementary Middle Senior High .398* .096* .185* 0.1793() 0.0897() 0.1386() 0.237() 0.096() 0.128() 0.145() 0.070() 0.104() Mu l t i -Fam i l y Elementary Middle Senior High .117* .028* .029* 0.5853() 0.2938() 0.3116() 0.382() 0.153() 0.151() 0.116() 0.048() 0.038() Enrollment 2018-2019 25,832() 21,743() 16,949() 18,273() *Kent School District did not update student generation rates from 2018. Issues • All school districts: o McCleary decision to reduce K-3 class size to 17 and 4-12 class size to 25; legislature expects compliance in 2019/2020. o Enrollment declined for most districts and King County. • Auburn: o Continuing progress on projects approved as part of $456 million bond (approved by voters in 2016). Projects include replacement of six schools and construction of two new elementary schools. • Highline: o Not recommending impact fees due to declining enrollment. • Federal Way: o Design work underway for six projects approved as part of $450 million bond (approved by voters in 2017); includes Star Lake Elementary in Kent. o Elementary capacity pressure (1,000 unhoused elementary students); acquired commercial building to renovate for additional capacity. • Kent: o This CFP update was minor due to no significant changes in capital project planning/financing; KSD anticipates a more significant update next year including reconsideration of impact fee approach. 6.D.a Packet Pg. 31 At t a c h m e n t : S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s _ G e n e r a l S t a t i s t i c s T a b l e ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n / C a p i t a l 1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2019/20 – 2024/25 School Dist. Capital Facilities Plans ORDINANCE NO.________ AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the Kent Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities Element to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School Districts (CPA-2019-1). RECITALS A. The State of Washington Growth Management Act (GMA) requires internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements and the plans from other jurisdictions. B. To assure that comprehensive plans remain relevant and up to date, the GMA allows amendments to the capital facilities element of comprehensive plans concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a city budget. RCW 36.70A.130(2)(a)(iv). C. The City of Kent has established procedures for amending the Comprehensive Plan in Chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code (KCC), allowing amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the City budget and allowing the City Council to hold the public hearing instead of the Land Use and Planning Board. KCC 12.02.010. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 32 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2019/20 – 2024/25 School Dist. Capital Facilities Plans D. The Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School Districts have submitted proposed amendments to their Capital Facilities Plans to be included in an amendment of the City’s Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. E. After providing appropriate public notice, the City Council of the City of Kent considered the requested Comprehensive Plan amendment and held a public hearing on the same on October 15, 2019. F. On September 20, 2019, the City provided the required 60 day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 to the State of Washington of the City’s proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The 60 day notice period has passed, and by operation of law, it is deemed approved. G. On November 19, 2019, the City Council of the City of Kent approved the Capital Facilities Element amendment CPA-2019-1 to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit “A” attached and incorporated by this reference. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE SECTION 1. - Amendment. The Kent Comprehensive Plan, and its Capital Facilities Element, are amended to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit “A” attached and incorporated by this reference (CPA- 2019-1). SECTION 2. – Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon 6.D.b Packet Pg. 33 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e 3 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2019/20 – 2024/25 School Dist. Capital Facilities Plans approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering; or references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations. SECTION 3. – Severability. If any one or more section, subsection, or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, that decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. – Effective Date. This ordinance will take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law. DANA RALPH, MAYOR Date Approved ATTEST: KIMBERLEY A. KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted Date Published APPROVED AS TO FORM: PAT FITZPATRICK, CITY ATTORNEY 6.D.b Packet Pg. 34 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 2018-19 through 2024-25 May 2019 Kent School District No. 415 12033 SE 256th Street Kent, Washington 98030-6643 (253) 373-7295 BOARD of DIRECTORS Ms. Maya Vengadasalam, President Ms. Deborah Straus, Vice President Mr. Ross Hardy, Legislative Representative Ms. Karen DeBruler, Director Ms. Denise Daniels, Director ADMINISTRATION Dr. Calvin J. Watts Superintendent of Schools Israel Vela, Chief School Operations and Academic Support Officer Dr. Jewelle Harmon, Chief Accountability Officer Mr. Benjamin Rarick, Executive Director of Fiscal Services 6.D.b Packet Pg. 35 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan May 2019 Page 2 of 17 Mr. Dave Bussard, Director of Facilities Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table of Contents I - Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 3 II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection .................................................................................... 4 III - Current Kent School District “Standard of Service" ...................................................... 6 Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students ................................................... 7 Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students ........................................ 8 IV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools .................................................................. 9 V - Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan ..................................................................... 10 VI - Portable Classrooms ................................................................................................... 12 VII - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity ..................................................................... 13 VIII - Finance Plan .............................................................................................................. 13 IX - Summary of Changes to June 2017 Capital Facilities Plan ......................................... 16 X - Appendices................................................................................................................... 17 6.D.b Packet Pg. 36 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan May 2019 Page 3 of 17 I - Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Kent School District (the "District") as the organization's capital facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual Plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2019 for the 2019-2020 school year. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long-Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and Renton and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. This Plan has also been submitted to cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac for their information and inclusion in their Comprehensive Plans. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee- implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Program capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Portables in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 37 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan May 2019 Page 4 of 17 The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District’s standard of service and the existing inventory of permanent facilities. The District's program capacity of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the state’s mandated reduction of class size to meet the standard of service for Kent School District. Portables provide additional transitional capacity. Kent School District is the fifth largest (FTE basis) district in the state. Enrollment is electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (“OSPI”) on Form P-223. Although funding apportionment is based on Annual Average Full Time Equivalent (AAFTE), enrollment on October 1 is a widely recognized “snapshot in time” that is used to report the District’s enrollment for the year as reported to OSPI. The District received authorization from the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction to temporarily re-open the former Kent Elementary School at 317 Fourth Avenue South in Kent. This facility is used to house the kindergarten and early child education classes for both Kent and Neely-O’Brien Elementary Schools to alleviate overcrowding at those schools. This building re-opened in fall 2014 as the Kent Valley Early Learning Center. The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of transitional facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of portables. A financing plan is included in Section VIII which demonstrates the District's ability to implement this Plan. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated annually with changes in the impact fee schedules adjusted accordingly. II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, enrollment growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years. (See Table 2, page7 and map page 37). The student generation factor is the basis for the growth projections from new developments. (See Page 5) King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system. (See Table 1, page 6) 8.19% of 25,032 King County live births in 2014 is projected for 1,965 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2019. This is an increase of 402 live births in King County over the previous year. (See Table 2, page 7) 6.D.b Packet Pg. 38 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan May 2019 Page 5 of 17 Early Childhood Education students (also identified as “ECE”), “Early Childhood Special Education (“ECSE”) students are forecast and reported to OSPI separately on Form P-223H for Special Education Enrollment. Capacity is reserved to serve students in the ECE programs at elementary schools. The first grade population of Kent School District is traditionally 1-3% larger than the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District. Cohort survival method uses historical enrollment data to forecast the number of students projected for the following year. Projections for October 1, 2019-2024 are from OSPI Report 1049 – Determination of Projected Enrollments. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions will be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. (see map page 36) The Kent School District serves eight permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, and Auburn and smaller portions of the cities of SeaTac, Black Diamond, and Maple Valley. STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last ten years. Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary .398 Middle School .096 Senior High .185 Total .679 Multi-Family Elementary .117 Middle School .028 Senior High .029 Total .174 6.D.b Packet Pg. 39 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan May 2019 Page 6 of 17 The student generation factor is based on a survey of 2,757 single-family dwelling units and 1,831 multi-family dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy rates. Please refer to Appendix D on Page 34 of the Capital Facilities Plan for details of the Student Generation Factor survey. In preparing the 2018-2019 to 2024-2025 Capital Facilities Plan the District contracted with Davis Demographics and Planning (DDP) of Riverside California, a noted expert in demographic studies for school districts, to analyze and prepare the student generation factor. DDP used a larger sample of single family residences than the district did in previous plans and included both “garden” and “urban style” apartments in the calculation for multi-family residences. Urban style apartments typically have four stories, a central lobby and entrance, elevator access to all floors and have a central corridor with apartments on each side. These apartments have little or no surface street parking, with parking located beneath the building; retail may or may not be included with the building. If there is retail it will generally be located on the first floor. These apartments seldom have swimming pools and do not have playgrounds for children. Garden style apartments will have very little studio apartments and will have more three bedroom apartments then the urban style and in theory generate more students enrolled in school. These apartments will also have lawns, club houses, swimming pools and places for children to play. The District felt that it is important to include both styles of apartments for the student generation factor. Though it is anticipated that few students will come from the urban style, they are now part of the mix in Kent and thus should be included in mix of multi- family housing units. Within the district’s borders there are several low-income and multi-family housing projects coming on-line during 2019-2020. Once developed with occupancy occurring the District does recognize that the student generation for multi-family housing will likely increase for future Capital Facilities Plan updates. III - Current Kent School District “Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County Code 21A.06 references a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the district which would best serve the student population. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 40 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 OCTOBER REPORT 1251H (HEADCOUNT) ENROLLMENT HISTORY LB = Live Births LB in 2004 LB in 2005 LB in 2006 LB in 2007 LB in 2008 LB in 2009 LB in 2010 LB in 2011 LB in 2012 LB in 2013 October HC Enrollment 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 King County Live Births 1 22,874 22,680 24,244 24,899 25,222 25,057 24,514 24,630 25,032 24,910 Increase / Decrease 443 -194 1,564 655 323 -165 -543 116 402 -122 Kindergarten / Birth % 1 8.33%8.13%8.18%8.57%8.40%8.34%8.34%8.17%8.14%7.98% Kindergarten 1905 1845 1983 2134 2119 2090 2045 2,013 2,037 1,989 Grade 1 1961 1996 1888 2017 2186 2127 2131 2,067 2,056 2,061 Grade 2 1966 1942 2016 1905 2055 2190 2163 2,163 2,077 2,008 Grade 3 1977 2002 1983 2082 1922 2070 2176 2,195 2,143 2,043 Grade 4 2052 1956 2024 2000 2087 1956 2089 2,195 2,218 2,118 Grade 5 2091 2086 1974 2044 2008 2116 1958 2,103 2,189 2,170 Grade 6 2075 2135 2135 2026 2079 2023 2058 1,952 2,119 2,184 Grade 7 Middle School 2117 2095 2105 2139 2046 2104 1974 2,021 1,922 2,043 Grade 8 " "2173 2153 2111 2139 2121 2091 2100 2,021 2,043 1,882 Grade 9 Senior High 2472 2440 2471 2455 2483 2428 2093 2,105 2,006 2,003 Grade 10 " "2217 2238 2272 2092 2046 2151 2165 2,099 2,080 1,946 Grade 11 " "2046 2048 1995 1933 1873 1802 1818 1,865 1,823 1,732 Grade 12 " "1712 1694 1658 1646 1539 1576 1742 1,730 1,810 1,653 Total Enrollment 2 26,764 26,630 26,615 26,612 26,564 26,724 26,512 26,529 26,523 25,832 Yearly Headcount Increase / Decrease -67 -134 -15 -3 -48 160 -212 17 -6 -691 Cumulative Increase -67 -201 -216 -219 -267 -107 -319 -302 -308 -999 Change to Full Day Kindergarten for all schools For 2019 CFP - Headcount Enrollment History Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 1 May 2019 6.D.b Packet Pg. 41 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX - YEAR ENROLLMENT PROJECTION Full Day Kindergarten at all Elem LB in 2012 LB in 2013 LB in 2014 LB in 2015 LB in 2016 Est LB in 2017 Est LB in 2018 Est LB in 2019 A C T U A L ACTUAL P R O J E C T I O N October 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 King County Live Births 25,032 24,910 25,348 25,487 26,011 26,011 26,011 26,011 Increase / Decrease 402 -122 438 139 524 0 0 0 Kindergarten / Birth % 8.14%7.98%7.75%7.62%7.37%7.28%7.19%7.10% FD Kindergarten 2,037 1,989 1,965 1,941 1,917 1,893 1,869 1,846 Grade 1 2,056 2,061 2,016 1,991 1,967 1,943 1,918 1,894 Grade 2 2,077 2,008 2,067 2,022 1,997 1,973 1,949 1,924 Grade 3 2,143 2,043 2,004 2,063 2,018 1,993 1,969 1,945 Grade 4 2,218 2,118 2,057 2,017 2,077 2,032 2,006 1,982 Grade 5 2,189 2,170 2,116 2,055 2,015 2,075 2,030 2,004 Grade 6 2,119 2,184 2,162 2,109 2,048 2,008 2,068 2,023 Grade 7 1,922 2,043 2,148 2,127 2,074 2,014 1,975 2,034 Grade 8 2,043 1,882 2,058 2,163 2,141 2,088 2,028 1,988 Grade 9 2,006 2,003 1,928 2,108 2,215 2,193 2,139 2,077 Grade 10 2,080 1,946 1,891 1,819 1,989 2,090 2,069 2,018 Grade 11 1,823 1,732 1,669 1,622 1,560 1,706 1,792 1,774 Grade 12 1,810 1,653 1,607 1,548 1,505 1,447 1,583 1,662 Total Enrollment Projection 26,523 25,832 25,688 25,585 25,523 25,455 25,395 25,171 Yearly Increase/Decrease -6 -691 -144 -103 -62 -68 -60 -224 Yearly Increase/Decrease %-2.61%-0.56%-0.40%-0.24%-0.27%-0.24%-0.88% Total Enrollment Projection 26,523 25,832 25,688 25,585 25,523 25,455 25,395 25,171 2019 - 2024 Projections from OSPI Report 1049 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 May 2019 6.D.b Packet Pg. 42 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan May 2019 Page 7 of 17 This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as “impact” schools and the standard of service targets a lower class size at those facilities. Portables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (See Appendix A, B & C) The standard of service defined herein will continue to evolve in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service. This process will affect various aspects of the District's standard of service and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students Class size for Kindergarten is planned for an average of 17 or fewer students. Class size for grades 1 - 3 is planned for an average of 23 or fewer students. Class size for grades 4 - 6 is planned for an average of 27 or fewer students. The class size ratio for Kindergarten-3rd grade is 23 students with a class cap of 26, per the negotiated collective bargaining agreement with KEA. Beginning in 19-20, K-3 class size is calculated for a ratio of 1:17, after considering all allowable FTE per the RCW. Beginning in the 2015-2016, the state has a funded a lower class size in 14 elementary schools that were classified as high poverty. Currently, the state now funds a class size of 17 to 1 in all schools for grades K – 3. Compliance with this new state class size funding requirement has been delayed to the 2019-20 school year, the district is exploring options to staff grades K – 3 at or near the 17 to 1 level. Some special programs require specialized classroom space and the program capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in special programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs. Students may also be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Some identified students will also be provided educational opportunities in classrooms for special programs such as those designated as follows: English Learners (EL) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) – Federal Program Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) – State Program Highly Capable Students – State Program 6.D.b Packet Pg. 43 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan May 2019 Page 8 of 17 Reading, math or science Labs Dual Language Programs in three elementary schools Inclusive Education Service for Elementary and Secondary students with disabilities may be provided in a separate or self-contained classroom sometimes with a capacity of 10- 15 depending on the program: • Early Childhood Special Education (ECSE) -3-4 yr. old students with disabilities • Tiered Intervention in Inclusive Education Support Center Programs • Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) • Self-contained Inclusive Education Support Center Programs (SC) • School Adjustment Programs for students with behavioral disorders (SA) • Adaptive Support Center for Mild, Moderate & Severe Disabilities (ASCDD) • Speech & Language Therapy & Programs for Hearing Impaired students • Occupational & Physical Therapy Programs (OT/PT) • The Outreach Program (TOP) for 18-21 year old secondary students Some newer buildings have been constructed to accommodate most of these programs; some older buildings have been modified, and in some circumstances, these modifications reduce the classroom capacity of the buildings. When programs change, program capacity is updated to reflect the change in program and capacity. Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings. The average class size for grades 7–8 is 30 students per class with a cap per teacher of 150 students. The average class size for grades 9-12 is 32 students per class with a cap per teacher of 160 students. Similar to Inclusive Education Programs listed above, many other secondary programs require specialized classroom space which can reduce the program capacity of the permanent school buildings. Identified secondary students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows: • Computer, Multi-Media & Technology Labs & Programs • Technology Academy at Kent-Meridian High School & Mill Creek Middle School 6.D.b Packet Pg. 44 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan May 2019 Page 9 of 17 • Science Programs & Labs – Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Oceanography, Astronomy, Meteorology, Marine Biology, General Science, etc. • English Learners (EL) • Music Programs – Band, Orchestra, Chorus, Jazz Band, etc. • Art Programs – Painting, Design, Drawing, Ceramics, Pottery, Photography, etc. • Theater Arts – Drama, Stage Tech, etc. • Journalism and Yearbook Classes • Highly Capable (Honors or Gifted) and Advanced Placement Programs • International Baccalaureate (“IB”) Program • JROTC - Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps • Career & Technical Education Programs (CTE - Vocational Education) • Family & Consumer Science – Culinary Arts, Sewing, Careers with/Children/Education, etc. • Child Development Preschool and Daycare Programs • Health & Human Services – Sports Medicine, Sign Language, Cosmetology, etc. • Business Education – Word Processing, Accounting, Business Law & Math, Marketing, Economics, Web Design, DECA, FBLA (Future Business Leaders). • Technical & Industry – Woodworking, Cabinet Making, Building Trades, Metals, Automotive & Manufacturing Technology, Welding, Drafting, Drawing, CAD (Computer-aided Design), Electronics, Engineering & Design, Aviation, ASL, etc. • Graphic & Commercial Arts, Media, Photography, Theater & Stage, Agriculture & Horticulture. • Kent Phoenix Academy – Performance Learning Center, Gateway, Virtual High School, and Kent Success programs Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 85% for secondary schools. Program capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level. IV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 27,255 students and transitional (portable) capacity to house 2,085. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section III. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity. (See Table 3 on Page 11). The ratio between permanent capacity and portable capacity is 94.9%-5.1%. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 45 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS 2018-19 SCHOOL Year Opened ABR ADDRESS Program Capacity Carriage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235 - 140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 428 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042 360 Covington Elementary 2018 CO 25811 156th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 630 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225 - 180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 408 East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 464 Emerald Park 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 477 Fairwood Elementary 1969 FW 16600 - 148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 386 George T. Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 432 Glenridge Elementary 1996 GR 19405 - 120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 431 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700 - 191st Place SE, Kent 98042 428 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641 - 144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 477 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915 - 186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 384 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700 - 64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 454 Kent Valley Early Learning Center 2014 KV 317 ---4th Ave S, Kent, WA 98032 318 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660 - 142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 497 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 455 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710 - 108th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 454 Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621 - 140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 497 Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98030 478 Neely-O'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 454 Panther Lake Elementary 2009 PL 20831 - 108th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 497 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 463 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825 - 118th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 487 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030 - 162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 477 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135 - 228th Ave SE, Black Diamond 98010 477 Scenic Hill Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030 454 Soos Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 360 Springbrook Elementary 1969 SB 20035 - 100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 396 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300 - 132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 477 Elementary TOTAL 13,000 Cedar Heights Middle School 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 Street, Covington 98042 895 Mattson Middle School 1981 MA 16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042 787 Meeker Middle School 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 832 Meridian Middle School 1958 MM 23480 - 120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 792 Mill Creek Middle School 2005 MC 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 916 Northwood Middle School 1996 NW 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 926 Middle School TOTAL 5,148 Kent-Meridian High School 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98030 1,904 Kentlake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042 1,957 Kentridge Senior High School 1968 KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 2,277 Kentwood Senior High School 1981 KW 25800 - 164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 2,159 Senior High TOTAL 8,297 Kent Mountain View Academy 1997 MV/LC 22420 Military Road, Des Moines 98198 396 Kent Phoenix Academy 2007 PH 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98030 414 DISTRICT TOTAL 27,255 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 May 2019 6.D.b Packet Pg. 46 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Kent School D istrict So ur ces : Esr i, H ERE , DeLo r me, U SGS , Inte r m ap , INC R EM ENT P,NR C a n, Esr i Japa n, M ET I, Esr i C h in a (Ho ng Kong ), Esr i Kor ea, Esr i(T ha i lan d ), M ap m yIn dia, N GC C , © O penStr eetM ap c ontrib u to r s,and th e GIS U se r C om m unity May 22, 2017 0 3.5 71.75 mi 0 5.5 112.75 km 1:144,448 Davi s D e m o gr aphic s & Plan ni ngMap by: Sc hoolSite L oca to r 6.D.b Packet Pg. 47 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Kent School D istrict So ur ces : Esr i, H ERE , DeLo r me, U SGS , Inte r m ap , INC R EM ENT P,NR C a n, Esr i Japa n, M ET I, Esr i C h in a (Ho ng Kong ), Esr i Kor ea, Esr i(T ha i lan d ), M ap m yIn dia, N GC C , © O penStr eetM ap c ontrib u to r s,and th e GIS U se r C om m unity May 22, 2017 0 3.5 71.75 mi 0 5.5 112.75 km 1:144,448 Davi s D e m o gr aphic s & Plan ni ngMap by: Sc hoolSite L oca to r 6.D.b Packet Pg. 48 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Kent School D istrict So ur ces : Esr i, H ERE , DeLo r me, U SGS , Inte r m ap , INC R EM ENT P,NR C a n, Esr i Japa n, M ET I, Esr i C h in a (Ho ng Kong ), Esr i Kor ea, Esr i(T ha i lan d ), M ap m yIn dia, N GC C , © O penStr eetM ap c ontrib u to r s,and th e GIS U se r C om m unity May 22, 2017 0 3.5 71.75 mi 0 5.5 112.75 km 1:144,448 Davi s D e m o gr aphic s & Plan ni ngMap by: Sc hoolSite L oca to r 6.D.b Packet Pg. 49 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan May 2019 Page 10 of 17 The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs, additional classrooms and new schools. Program capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes implemented in the Fall of 2018. Calculation of Elementary, Middle School and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B, and C. Maps of existing schools are included on Pages 12-14. For clarification, the following is a brief description of some of the non-traditional programs for students in Kent School District: Kent Mountain View Academy serves Grades 3 – 12 with transition, choice, and home school assistance programs. This school was originally designed as an elementary school and is included in the elementary capacity for this Plan. Kent Phoenix Academy is a non-traditional high school opened in fall 2007. Kent Phoenix Academy has four special programs including the Performance Learning Center, Gateway, Virtual High School, and Kent Success. Both the Kent Mountain View Academy and the Kent Phoenix Academy will be sharing the building that formerly served Sequoia Middle School beginning the school year 2019- 2020. The Kent Mountain View Academy site will be the location of the New Valley Elementary School. iGrad - Kent School District has pioneered the Individualized Graduation and Degree Program or “iGrad”. iGrad offers a second chance to students age 16-21 who have dropped out of high school and want to earn a high school diploma. iGrad is not included in this Capital Facilities Plan because it is served in leased space at the Kent Hill Plaza Shopping Center. Over the past three years, enrollment in the iGrad program has averaged over 300 students. V - Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan In November 2017, the voters of the Kent School District approved a bond measure for $252 million. This new bonding authority provides for a replacement for Covington Elementary school, which opened in August of 2018, a new elementary school in the Kent Valley (site will be the current Kent Mountain View Academy), and the twenty additional classrooms project redirected by the Kent School Board to build a Kent Academy Facility housing multiple academy programs in our district. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 50 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity Projected Projected % for SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE LOCATION Type Status Completion Program new Date Capacity Growth Approximate Approximate # on Map ELEMENTARY New Elementary School Kent Valley Elementary Addition Planning 2020-2021 700 100% 20 Additional Classrooms/New Academy Site Old Panther Lake Elementary Site Elementary Addition Planning 2019-2022 480 100% MIDDLE SCHOOL & SENIOR HIGH No new projects required for Secondary Schools at this time & Secondary Schools are excluded from Impact Fee formula. TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional Capacity Portables 1 TBD - For placement as needed New Planning 2019+24 - 31 each 100% # on Map 2 OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Land Use Designation Type 3 Ham Lake area (Pollard)16820 SE 240, Kent 98042 Rural Elementary 8 SE of Lake Morton area (West property)SE 332 & 204 SE, Kent 98042 Rural Secondary 2 Shady Lk area (Sowers, Blaine, Drahota, Paroline)17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98058 Urban Elementary 12 South Central Site (Yeh)SE 286th St & 124th Ave SE, Auburn 98092 Urban TBD Notes: 1 TBD - To be determined - Some sites are identified but placement, timing and/or configuration of portables has not been determined. 2 Numbers correspond to sites on Site Bank Map on Page 19. Other Map site locations are parcels identified in Table 7 on Page 29. Land Use Jurisdiction King County King County King County King County Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 May 2019 6.D.b Packet Pg. 51 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e copyright KROLL MAP COMPANY, INC. This map has been modified by KSD 08/01 Fairwood Elementary Ridgewood Elementary Northwood Middle School Lake Youngs Elementary Glenridge Elementary Kentridge High School Panther Lake Elementary Springbrook Elementary Soos Creek Elementary Sunrise Elementary Meridian Middle School Park Orchard Elementary Martin Sortun Elementary Daniel Elementary East Hill Elementary Kent Elementary Kent-Meridian High School Scenic Hill Elementary Kent School District Administration Center Meadow Ridge Elementary Pine Tree Elementary Horizon Elementary Covington Elementary Cedar Heights Middle School Cedar Valley Elementary Jenkins Creek Elementary Kentwood High School Crestwood Elementary Mattson Middle School Sawyer Woods Elementary Kentlake High School Kent Mountain View Academy Neely O’Brien Elementary Carriage Crest Elementary Meridian Elementary Meeker Middle School Grass Lake Elementary Emerald Park Elementary Kent Phoenix Academy Millennium Elementary Mill Creek Middle School 6.D.b Packet Pg. 52 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring 2019, the following projects to increase capacity are either in the planning phase or will start in spring 2019. •Planning is in progress for an additional elementary school in the Kent Valley in 2020 or beyond. The project will be funded with bond funds and impact fees. •Planning is in progress to add an Academy Facility at the Old Panther Lake Elementary Site in Kent in order to free up space at the former Sequoyah Middle School for additional classroom space if needed and/or to bring another middle school online in the near future. •Some funding for lease or purchase of additional portables may be provided by impact fees as needed. Sites are based on need for additional capacity. As a critical component of capital facilities planning, county and city planners and decision-makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety to and from school and bus stops as well as bus pull-outs and turn-arounds. Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future. (See Table 4 on Page 16 & Site map on Page 17). Voter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is secured for purchase of additional sites but some may be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. The Board of Directors has started the process to sell surplus property in the spring of 2015. The Board will continue an annual review of standards of service and those decisions will be reflected in each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. Anticipated 2019 – 2020 plan revisions The 2019 Capital Facilities Plan as submitted represents the final year of a series of one- year technical updates to the original Plan. However, the 2019-2020 school year represents a turning point for capital facilities planning in the district, and an opportunity to establish a fundamentally new four-year plan moving forward. This is necessitated by a few factors. The district will bring another school on-line (at the site of the former Kent Mountainview Academy) as early as the Fall of 2021 and will simultaneously initiate the process of exploring a redrawing of its district boundary map. The district will also Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan May 2019 Page 11 of 17 6.D.b Packet Pg. 53 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan May 2019 Page 12 of 17 initiate an in-depth study of long-range enrollment projections, and contract for a new analysis of student generation rates. The intent of this process will be to do a new “level- set” of the district’s Capital Facilities Plan, and to engage our community in anticipating the associated needs for the next 4-6 years moving forward. This process will culminate with an opportunity to rethink our district philosophy on impact fees, which for the last several years have been updated annually for inflation. VI - Portable Classrooms The Plan references use of portables as interim or transitional capacity and facilities. Currently, the District utilizes portables to house students in excess of permanent capacity and for program purposes at some school locations. (Please see Appendices A, B, C) Based on enrollment projections, implementation of full day kindergarten programs, lower state mandated class sizes, program capacity, and the need for additional permanent capacity, the District anticipates the need to purchase or lease additional portables during the next six-year period. During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District’s portables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the portables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these portables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the times of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Portables currently in the District’s inventory are continually evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced. The Plan projects that the District will use portables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of portables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between portables, emerging technologies, and educational restructuring will continue to be examined. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 54 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT SCHOOL YEAR 2018-2019 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 Actual Permanent Program Capacity 1 27,255 28,163 28,283 28,883 28,883 28,883 Changes to Permanent Capacity 1 Capacity Increase (F) New Elementary School in Kent Valley2 600 Additional Permanent Classrooms 120 120 120 120 120 120 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 27,375 28,283 29,003 29,003 29,003 29,003 Interim Portable Capacity 3 Elementary Portable Capacity Required 1,728 1,440 1,248 456 336 336 Middle School Portable Capacity Required 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 Senior High School Portable Capacity Required 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,728 1,440 1,248 456 336 336 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 29,103 29,723 30,251 29,459 29,339 29,339 TOTAL ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 4 25,832 25,688 25,585 25,523 25,455 25,395 25,171 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 5 3,271 4,035 4,666 3,936 3,884 3,944 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 New Elementary school will increase capacity and will be built on the existing site of Kent Mountain View Academy. 3 2019-2020 total classroom portable capacity is 1440. Some additional relocatable used for program purposes. 4 Actual October Headcount Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments. 5 School capacity meets concurrency requirements and no impact fees are proposed for secondary schools. P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 May 2019 6.D.b Packet Pg. 55 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY - Grades K - 6 SCHOOL YEAR 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 Actual Elementary Permanent Capacity 1 13,244 13,244 13,516 13,636 14,356 14,476 14,596 Kent Mountain View Academy 2 No Changes to Elementary Capacity New Elementary School in Kent Valley 600 Additional Permanent Classrooms 3 120 120 120 120 120 120 Subtotal 13,244 13,516 13,636 14,356 14,476 14,596 14,716 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 / 2 14,972 14,956 14,884 14,812 14,812 14,932 15,052 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 4 14,573 14,387 14,198 14,039 13,917 13,809 13,618 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 399 569 686 773 895 1,123 1,434 Number of Portables Required 72 60 52 19 14 14 14 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Kent Mountain View Academy is a special program serving students in Grades 3 - 12. The school building (formerly Kent Learning Center & Grandview Elem.) was designed as an elementary school. 3 Additional classrooms will be placed at schools with the greatest need for aleve overcrowding 4 Actual October Headcount Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments. Enrollment & Projections reflect FULL Day Kindergarten at ALL Elementary schools @ 1.0 & exclude ECSE Preschoolers P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A May 2019 6.D.b Packet Pg. 56 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY MIDDLE SCHOOL - Grades 7 - 8 SCHOOL YEAR 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 Actual Middle School Permanent Capacity 1 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 No Changes to Middle School Capacity Subtotal 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 Portable Capacity Required 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 & 3 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 2 3,925 4,206 4,290 4,215 4,102 4,003 4,022 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1,223 942 858 933 1,046 1,145 1,126 Number of Portables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Classroom Portables required at middle schools at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Actual October Headcount Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments. 3 Surplus capacity due to grade level reconfiguration - All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004. P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B May 2019 6.D.b Packet Pg. 57 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH - Grades 9 - 12 SCHOOL YEAR 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 Actual Senior High Permanent Capacity 1 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 Includes Kent Phoenix Academy 2 No Changes to High School Capacity Subtotal 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 Portables Capacity Required 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 3 7,334 7,095 7,097 7,269 7,436 7,583 7,531 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1,377 1,616 1,614 1,442 1,275 1,128 1,180 Number of Portables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Classroom Portables required at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Kent Phoenix Academy opened in Fall 2007 serving grades 9 - 12 with four special programs. 3 Actual October Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments. Set print area here P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C May 2019 6.D.b Packet Pg. 58 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan May 2019 Page 13 of 17 VII - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section IV, the program capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size requirements, class size fluctuations etc. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3 on Page 13, the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts. (See Tables 5 & 5 A-B-C on pages 20-23). Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment “snapshot in time” to report enrollment for the year. Kent School District continues to be the fifth largest district (both FTE and headcount basis) in the state of Washington. Kent School District continues to be the fifth largest district (both FTE and headcount basis) in the state of Washington. The P-223 Headcount for October 2017 was 26,523 with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECSE and college-only Running Start students. A full headcount of all students enrolled in October 2017 totals 28,192, which included ECSE and college-only Running Start students. In October 2018, there were 1,118 students in 11th and 12th grade participating in the Running Start program at different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. Of these students, 593 attended classes only at the college (“college-only”) and are excluded from FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District has one of the highest Running Start program participation rates in the state. Based on the enrollment forecasts, permanent facility inventory and capacity, current standard of service, portable capacity, and future additional classroom space, the District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of portables. (See Table 5 and Tables 5 A-B-C on Pages 20-23). This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There may be a need for additional portables and/or new schools to accommodate growth within the District. New schools may be designed to accommodate placement of future portables. School attendance area changes, limited and costly movement of portables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and underutilization of facilities in different parts of the District. VIII - Finance Plan 6.D.b Packet Pg. 59 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan May 2019 Page 14 of 17 The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2019-2020 through 2023-2024. The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on future bond issues, state school construction assistance, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. The plan also includes an additional elementary school in the Kent Valley which has been determined to be located at the current site of the Kent Mountain View Academy on Military Road in SeaTac. Kent Mountain View Academy will share space at the current Kent Phoenix Academy (located at the former Sequoyah Middle School) starting the 2019- 2020 school year. This new school will increase the capacity at the elementary level by 700 students. Some impact fees are scheduled to be part of the overall finance plan. In November 2016, the District held a special election to approve the authorization of $252,000,000 in bonding authority. The projects described above are part of this authorization. The first series of bonds ($80 million) were issued in February 2017, which will fund the New Valley Elementary School and the New Academy Facility, as well as other infrastructure projects. Impact fees will be used at both projects due to escalation in construction pricing across the pacific northwest. The Finance Plan includes new portables to be purchased or leased to provide additional capacity and some may be funded from impact fees. Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary level and unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future and reported in annual updates of the Capital Facilities Plan. No impact fees are requested for secondary schools in this Plan. For the Six-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Facilities Department. Please see pages 27-28 for a summary of the cost basis. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 60 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan May 2019 Page 15 of 17 Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last elementary school, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost of the future elementary schools and additional classrooms. Elementary School Cost Projected Cost Projected cost - Covington Elementary Replacement (Project opened Fall 2018) $46,077,470 Projected cost of New Elementary School Kent Valley (Projected to open Fall 2021) $40,000,000 Projected cost of New Academy Facility (projected to open Fall 2021) $18,000,000 Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 on page 28 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. District Adjustment The impact fee calculations on pages 30 and 31 include a “District Adjustment” which is equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas total for this year and adjusted for the increase in the Consumer Price Index (2.9%) for the Seattle metropolitan area. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 61 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN Secured Unsecured Impact SCHOOL FACILITIES *2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 TOTAL Local & State State 2 or Local 3 Fees 5 Estimated Estimated PERMANENT FACILITIES Covington Elementary Replacement 1 F $46,077,470 $46,077,470 $37,777,470 $8,300,000 New Elementary School - Kent Valley F $40,000,000 $40,000,000 $40,000,000 $1,840,000 Elementary Site Acquisition (10 acres)$1,100,000 $1,100,000 $1,056,000 $44,000 20 Classrooms / New Academy Site F $4,207,250 $4,207,250 $4,207,250 $4,207,250 $16,829,000 $15,146,100 $605,000 NO Secondary School Projects at this time. TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional portables 3 - 4 U $1,125,000 $393,750 $1,518,750 $1,518,750 9 portables 3 portables OTHER N / A Totals $51,409,720 $5,701,000 $44,207,250 $4,207,250 $0 $105,525,220 $53,979,570 $40,000,000 $12,307,750 * F = Funded U = Unfunded NOTES: 1 Based on estimates of actual or future construction costs from Facilities Department. (See Page 26 for Cost Basis Summary) 2 The District anticipates receiving some State Funding Construction Assistance for some projects. 3 Facility needs are pending review. Some of these projects may be funded with impact fees. 4 Cost of portables based on current cost and adjusted for inflation for future years. 5 Fees in this column are based on amount of fees collected to date and estimated fees on future units. Notes & Comments from 06 Bond Issue for Portables (& Prev 2002 Bond Issue) 2011 - Per Ralph, $79K balance was transferred ("returned") to Bond Contingency - Reconciled with $0 in balance for Portables 2010 - 2009 - Per Fred & Ralph - $221K spent for NEW Portable at NO - Neely-O'Brien leaving a Balance of $79K in 06 Bond Issue 2008 - Per Ralph $300K from 06 bond Issue - $221K to be utilized for New Portable at NO 2008 - Previous balance of $145,211 from 2002 Bond has been expended (probably for replacement of double-wide Portable at FW 2007 - Per Ralph, Balance in Project 530 is now $145,211 2005 - Per Shelley - Added $166,040 to $144,390 = $310,430 $166,040 is from 2002 Bond funds to replace the double-wide Portable at FW 2004 - Same $144,390 carried forward from last year - Comes from Capital Projects to Date Report for Program 9430 & Project 530 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 6 May 2019 6.D.b Packet Pg. 62 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions & Costs Average of Sites Purchased, Sold or Built on within last 15 Years Type & # on Map School / Site Purchased Sold Location Acreage Cost/Price Avg cost-price/acre Total Average Cost / Acre Elementary 13 / Urban Panther Lake Elementary Replacement Site 2008 10200 SE 216 St, Kent 98031 9.40 $4,485,013 $477,129 12 / Urban Property Sale-29.7 acres of Plemons-Yeh site 2016 SSE 124th Ave and 284th ST SE 29.70 $947,536 $31,904 5 / Urban Elementary Site (Halleson & Wikstrom) 2004 15435 SE 256 St, Covington 98042 10.00 $1,093,910 $109,391 7 / Rural Property Sale - Scarsella site 2015 2900 Kent Black Diamond RD SE 13.25 $330,000 $24,906 Elementary Site Subtotal 62.35 $6,856,459 $109,967 Elem site average Middle School 10 / Urban Mill Creek MS (Kent JH) / McMillan St. assemblage 2002 411-432 McMillan St., Kent 98032 1.23 $844,866 $686,883 Middle School Site Subtotal 1.23 $844,866 $686,883 Middle Schl Site Avg. Senior High 11 / Urban K-M High School Addition (Kent 6 & Britt Smith)2002 & 2003 10002 SE 256th Street 6.31 $3,310,000 $524,564 Senior High Site Subtotal 6.31 $3,310,000 $524,564 Sr Hi Site Average Note: All rural sites were purchased prior to adoption of Urban Growth Area. Numbers correspond to locations on Site Bank & Acquisitions Map on Page 17. Properties purchased prior to 2000 4 / Urban Site - Covington area North (So of Mattson MS)1984 3 / Rural Site - Ham Lake east (Pollard)1992 69.89 $11,011,325 8 / Rural Site - SE of Lake Morton area (West property)1993 2 / Urban Site - Shady Lake (Sowers-Blaine-Drahota-Paroline)1995 12 / Urban Site - Yeh-Williams (W of 132 Ave SE at SE 288)1999 Total Acreage & Cost Total Average Cost / Acre $157,552 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 7 May 2019 6.D.b Packet Pg. 63 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors - Single Family Student Generation Factors - Multi-Family Elementary (Grades K - 6)0.398 Elementary 0.117 Middle School (Grades 7 - 8)0.096 Middle School 0.028 Senior High (Grades 9 - 12)0.185 Senior High 0.029 Total 0.679 Total 0.174 Projected Increased Student Capacity OSPI - Square Footage per Student Elementary 2,516 Elementary 90 Middle School 0 Middle School 117 Senior High Addition 0 Senior High 130 Special Education 144 Required Site Acreage per Facility Elementary (required)11 Average Site Cost / Acre Middle School (required)21 Elementary $109,967 Senior High (required)32 Middle School $686,883 Senior High $524,564 New Facility Construction Cost Elementary *$46,077,470 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost Middle School $0 Elementary @ 24 $125,000 Senior High *$0 Middle School @ 29 $0 * See cost basis on Pg. 26 Senior High @ 31 $0 Temporary Facility Square Footage State Funding Assistance Credit Elementary 142,980 District Funding Assistance Percentage 56.96% Middle School 10,736 Senior High 22,192 Total 5.1%175,908 Construction Cost Allocation CCA - Cost/Sq, Ft. (Effective July 2018)$225.97 Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary (Includes KMVA)1,470,543 Middle School 660,904 District Average Assessed Value Senior High 1,110,415 Single Family Residence $407,255 Total 94.9%3,241,862 Total Facilities Square Footage District Average Assessed Value Elementary 1,613,523 Multi-Family Residence $151,126 Middle School 671,640 Senior High 1,132,607 Total 3,417,770 Bond Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 Current / $1,000 Tax Rate $1.04 Developer Provided Sites / Facilities Value 0 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Dwelling Units 0 Current Bond Interest Rate 3.95% CPI Inflation Factor 2.90% Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX A)May 2019 6.D.b Packet Pg. 64 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre Facility Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary)11 $407,255 630 0.398 $2,830.10 A 2 (Middle School)21 $0 1,065 0.096 $0 A 3 (Senior High)32 $0 1,000 0.138 $0 0.632 A $2,830.10 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary)$46,077,470 630 0.398 0.903 $26,285.66 B 2 (Middle School)$0 900 0.096 0.984 $0 B 3 (Senior High)$0 1,600 0.185 0.998 $0 0.679 B $26,285.66 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary)$125,000 24 0.398 0.097 $201.07 C 2 (Middle School)$0 29 0.096 0.016 $0 C 3 (Senior High)$0 31 0.138 0.02 $0 0.632 C $201.07 State Funding Assistance Credit per Single Family Residence (formerly "State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor Construction Cost Allocation SPI Sq. Ft. / Student Assistance %Student Factor D 1 (Elementary)$225.97 90 0.5696 0.398 $4,610.48 D 2 (Middle School)$225.97 117 0 0.096 $0 D 3 (Senior High)$225.97 130 0 0.185 $0 D $4,610.48 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value $407,255 Current Debt Service Rate / $1,000 $1.04 Current Bond Interest Rate 3.95% Years Amortized (10 Years)10 TC $2,468.35 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $2,830.10 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $26,285.66 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $201.07 Subtotal $29,316.83 D = State Match Credit per Residence $4,610.48 TC = Tax Credit per Residence $2,468.35 Subtotal -$7,078.83 Total Unfunded Need $22,238.00 50% Developer Fee Obligation $11,119 FC = Facility Credit (if applicable)0 District Adjustment (see page 28 for explanation)(5,732) Net Fee Obligation per Residence - Single Family $5,554 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX B)May 2019 6.D.b Packet Pg. 65 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre Facility Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary)11 $151,126 630 0.117 $308.73 A 2 (Middle School)21 $0 1,065 0.028 $0 A 3 (Senior High)32 $0 1,000 0.029 $0 0.174 A $308.73 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent / Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary)$46,077,470 630 0.117 0.903 $7,727.19 B 2 (Middle School)$0 1,065 0.028 0.984 $0 B 3 (Senior High)$0 1,600 0.029 0.998 $0 0.174 B $7,727.19 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary)$125,000 24 0.117 0.097 $59.11 C 2 (Middle School)$0 29 0.028 0.016 $0 C 3 (Senior High)$0 31 0.029 0.02 $0 0.174 C $59.11 State Funding Assistance Credit per Multi-Family Residence (formerly "State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance SPI Sq. Ft. / Student Equalization %Student Factor D 1 (Elementary)$225.97 90 0.5696 0.117 $1,355.34 D 2 (Middle School)$225.97 117 0 0.028 $0 D 3 (Senior High)$225.97 130 0 0.029 $0 D $1,355.34 Tax Credit per Multi-Family Residence Unit Average MF Residential Assessed Value $151,126 Current Debt Service Rate / $1,000 $1.04 Current Bond Interest Rate 3.95% Years Amortized (10 Years)10 TC $1,219.76 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per Multi-Family Unit $308.73 B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $7,727.19 C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $59.11 Subtotal $8,095.03 D = State Match Credit per MF Unit $1,355.34 TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit $1,219.76 Subtotal -$2,575.10 Total Unfunded Need $5,519.93 50% Developer Fee Obligation $2,760 FC = Facility Credit (if applicable)0 District Adjustment (see page 28 for explanation)($415) Net Fee Obligation per Residential Unit - Multi-family $2,345 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX C)May 2019 6.D.b Packet Pg. 66 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan May 2019 Page 16 of 17 IX - Summary of Changes to June 2018 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the May 2018 Plan are summarized here. Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in class size as well as program changes. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect use, lease or purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement between facilities. The student headcount enrollment forecast is updated annually. All Elementary schools now have Full Day Kindergarten so six-year Kindergarten projections were previously modified to meet the requirements for Full Day Kindergarten programs at all elementary schools. The district expects to receive some State Funding Assistance (formerly called “state matching funds”) for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded site and facility needs will be reviewed in the future. The impact fees for 2019 will increase by the percentage increase of the consumer price index for the Seattle metropolitan area in. For 2018, the increase was 2.9%. For single- family residences, the fee will increase by $157 to $5,554. The impact fee for multi- family units will increase by $66 to $2,345. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 67 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan May 2019 Page 17 of 17 X - Appendices Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors include: ITEM Grade/Type FROM TO Comments Student Generation Factor Elem 0.257 0.398 Single Family (SF) MS 0.070 0.096 SH 0.138 0.185 Total 0.465 0.679 0.214 Increase Student Generation Factor Elem 0.111 0.117 Multi-Family (MF) MS 0.022 0.028 SH 0.039 0.029 Total 0.172 0.174 0.002 Increase State Funding Assistance Ratios (“State Match”) 56.96% 56.96% Per OSPI Website Area Cost Allowance $225.97 $225.97 Per OSPI Website Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SF $366,437 $407,255 Puget Sound ESD AV - Average of Condominiums & Apts. MF $143,332 $151,126 Puget Sound ESD Debt Service Capital Levy Rate / $1000 $1.0269 $1.04 Per King Co. Assessor Report General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 3.95% 3.95% Bond Buyers 20 year GO Index Impact Fee - Single Family SF $5,397 $5,554 Increase of $162 or 3.1% Impact Fee - Multi-Family MF $2,279 $2,345 Increase of $69 or 3.1% 6.D.b Packet Pg. 68 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 STANDARD of SERVICE - PROGRAM CAPACITY - INVENTORY of PORTABLES - FTE and HEADCOUNT ENROLLMENT (APPENDIX D) K S D Number of Std/High Cap 2 SE / IP 2 Special 2018-19 Program Classroom Relocatable 10/1/2018 10/1/2018 HI ELEMENTARY ABR Std or High Cap Capacity Program Program Use Use Capacity P223 FTE 3 P223 Hdcount POV 5 SCHOOL Classrooms at 22.69 average 1 CR Capacity Capacity 2 Portables Portables at 24 average 1 Enrollment Enrollment Carriage Crest CC 18 409 5 20 429 0 0 0 473.54 474 N Cedar Valley CV 15 340 6 20 360 2 1 24 268.00 268 Y Covington CO 20 454 5 24 630 2 1 24 606.20 607 N Crestwood CW 18 409 4 0 409 3 2 48 519.02 520 N East Hill EH 20 454 5 10 464 4 3 72 491.00 491 Y Emerald Park EP 21 477 2 0 477 2 1 24 525.00 525 Y Fairwood FW 17 386 3 0 386 2 1 24 369.00 369 N George T. Daniel Elem DE 18 409 5 24 433 3 2 48 485.00 485 Y Glenridge GR 19 431 4 0 431 1 1 24 473.03 474 Y Grass Lake GL 18 409 4 20 429 2 0 0 423.02 424 N Horizon HE 21 477 2 0 477 1 1 24 458.00 458 N Jenkins Creek JC 15 340 7 44 384 3 2 48 446.89 449 N Kent Elementary KE 20 454 3 0 454 4 2 48 646.00 646 Y Kent Valley Early Learn. CTR KV 14 318 0 0 318 0 0 0 Y Lake Youngs LY 21 477 7 20 497 2 0 0 482.05 484 N Martin Sortun MS 19 431 3 24 455 3 4 96 655.00 655 Y Meadow Ridge MR 17 386 6 68 454 4 2 48 529.00 529 Y Meridian Elementary ME 21 477 3 20 497 4 3 72 548.07 549 N Millennium Elementary ML 20 454 3 24 478 2 1 24 572.00 572 Y Neely-O'Brien NO 20 454 5 0 454 4 6 144 805.00 805 Y Panther Lake PL 21 477 5 20 552 2 9 264 652.00 652 Y Park Orchard PO 18 409 7 54 463 3 2 48 461.00 461 Y Pine Tree PT 21 477 4 10 487 1 3 72 440.59 441 Y Ridgewood RW 21 477 1 0 477 1 2 48 517.00 517 N Sawyer Woods SW 21 477 2 0 477 0 0 0 432.00 432 N Scenic Hill SH 17 386 6 68 454 5 7 168 601.03 602 Y Soos Creek SC 15 340 4 20 360 2 2 48 372.05 373 Y Springbrook SB 17 386 4 10 396 3 4 96 512.00 512 Y Sunrise SR 21 477 2 0 477 3 2 48 676.90 677 N Kent Mtn. View Academy MV 14 336 3 60 396 0 0 0 121.00 121 N Elementary TOTAL 1/2 558 12,684 120 560 13,451 68 64 1,584 14,560.39 14,572 1 Elementary classroom capacity is based on average of 22.69: 17 in K-3 & 25 in Grades 4-6. Includes adjustments for class size reduction or special program changes. 2 Kent School District Standard of Service reserves some rooms for pull-out programs. ie. 20 Total = 16 Standard + 1 Computer Lab + 1 Music +1 Integrated Program classroom. 3 All elementary schools have Full Day Kindergarten 4 Elementary schools have 100% space utilization rate with no adjustments for part-time use of classrooms. Counts exclude ECSE Preschoolers & space is reserved for ECE classrooms. 5 Elementary Schools in bold type are classified as High Poverty and class size in grades K-3 is 17:1 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan APPENDIX D May 2019 6.D.b Packet Pg. 69 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 STANDARD of SERVICE - PROGRAM CAPACITY - INVENTORY of PORTABLES - FTE and HEADCOUNT ENROLLMENT (APPENDIX E) K S D # of Standard SE / IP Special Ed Spec Special 1 2018-19 Program Classroom Relocatable 10/1/2018 10/1/2018 MIDDLE ABR Std Capacity 2 ELL Prgm Program Program Use Use Capacity P223 FTE 3 Headcount 3 SCHOOL Clsrms at 25-29 Cls Capacity Clsrms Capacity Capacity 2 Portables Portables at 29 ea.Enrollment Enrollment @ 85% Utilization @ 85% Utilization @ 85% Utilizatio @ 85% Utilization Cedar Heights Middle School CH 30 740 8 84 3 71 895 2 0 0 649.00 649 Mattson Middle School MA 24 592 6 76 5 119 787 4 0 0 610.18 612 Meeker Middle School MK 29 715 8 93 1 24 832 0 0 0 634.00 634 Meridian Middle School MJ 26 641 5 56 4 95 792 4 1 29 561.02 562 Mill Creek Middle School MC 33 813 5 55 2 48 916 0 2 58 834.54 835 Northwood Middle School NW 33 813 2 18 4 95 926 0 0 0 557.90 558 Kent Mountain View Academy (Grades 3 - 12) Middle School Grade 7 - 8 Enrollment See Elem 76.00 76 Middle School TOTAL 175 4,314 34 382 19 452 5,148 10 3 87 3,922.64 3,926 K S D # of Standard SE / IP Special Ed Spec Special 1 2018-19 Program Classroom Relocatable 10/1/2018 10/1/2018 SENIOR HIGH ABR Std Capacity ELL ELL Prgm Program Program Use Use Capacity P223 FTE 3 Headcount 3 SCHOOL Clsrms at 25-31 Cls Capacity Clsrms Capacity Capacity 2 Portables Portables at 31 ea.Enrollment Enrollment @ 85% Utilization @ 85% Utilization @ 85% Utilizatio @ 85% Utilization Kent-Meridian Senior High KM 56 1,476 12 157 12 271 1,904 1 10 310 1,797.94 1,861 Kentlake Senior High KL 58 1,423 13 153 16 381 1,957 0 0 0 1,287.89 1,372 Kentridge Senior High KR 65 1,713 13 136 18 428 2,277 1 2 62 1,781.76 1,864 Kentwood Senior High KW 60 1,581 9 102 20 476 2,159 2 6 186 1,687.96 1,827 Kent Mountain View Academy (Grades 3 - 12) Senior High Grade 9 - 12 Enrollment See Elem 52.49 55 Kent Phoenix Academy PH 414 414 237.18 245 Regional Justice Center 4 RJ N/A N/A 22.00 22 TOP The Outreach Program TOP 0.00 0 0 90.00 90 Senior High TOTAL 239 6,607 47 548 66 1,556 8,711 4 18 558 6,957.22 7,336 Excludes Running Start & Early Childhood Ed students DISTRICT TOTAL 431 11,307 87 998 85 2,008 14,313 19 28 813 25,440.25 25,834 1 Special Program capacity includes classrooms requiring specialized use such as Special Education, Career & Technical Education Programs, Computer Labs, etc. 2 Secondary school capacity is adjusted for 85% utilization rate. Facility Use Study was updated for program changes in 2015-16 3 Enrollment is reported on FTE & Headcount basis. P223 Headcount excludes ECSE & College-only Running Start students. Full headcount including ECE & RS = 28,090. Some totals may be slightly different due to rounding. 4 12 Juveniles served at King County Regional Justice Center are reported separately for Institutional Funding on Form E-672. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan APPENDIX E May 2019 6.D.b Packet Pg. 70 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : 37 6.D.b Packet Pg. 71 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2020 6.D.b Packet Pg. 72 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN June 6, 2019 BOARD OF EDUCATION Trudy Davis Hiroshi Eto Dr. Jennifer Jones Geoffery McAnalloy Luckisha Phillips SUPERINTENDENT Dr. Tammy Campbell Prepared by: Sally D. McLean, Chief Finance & Operations Officer Jennifer Wojciechowski, Student & Demographic Forecaster 6.D.b Packet Pg. 73 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 2-3 SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction 4 Inventory of Educational Facilities 5 Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities 6 Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities 7 Needs Forecast - New Facilities 8 Six Year Finance Plan 9 SECTION 2 MAPS Introduction 10 Map – City and County Jurisdictions 11 SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction 12 Building Capacities 13-15 Portable Locations 16-17 Student Forecast 18-20 SECTION 4 KING COUNTY, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, AND CITY OF KENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Introduction 21 Capacity Summaries 22-26 Impact Fee Calculations 27-28 Reference to Impact Fee Calculations 29-30 Student Generation Rates 31 Impact Fee Changes from 2018 to 2019 32 6.D.b Packet Pg. 74 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2 INTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB) 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, City of Kent Ordinance No.4278 effective June 2018, and the City of Auburn Ordinance No. 5078 effective 1998, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 2020 Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2019. This plan is scheduled to be submitted for consideration to each of the jurisdictions located with the Federal Way Public Schools’ service area: King County, the City of Kent, City of Federal Way and the City of Auburn and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is requested to be included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The City of Des Moines collects school impact fees as part of the SEPA process. Discussions with the City of Milton to adopt an ordinance for school impact fees for parcels located within the Federal Way School District’s service area is in process. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region’s need for housing, jobs, services, culture, and recreation. This Plan’s estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies or management need. During the 2016-17 school year the District formed a 100 member Facilities Planning Committee consisting of parents, community members and staff. The Committee was tasked with developing a recommendation to the Superintendent regarding Phase 2 of the District’s plan for school construction, remodeling, and/or modernization for voter consideration in November 2017. The voters passed this $450M bond authorization with a 62% YES vote reflecting a commitment to invest in the modernization of our infrastructure. Through the committee’s work a determination was made to rebuild Thomas Jefferson High School, Illahee Middle School, Totem Middle School, Lake Grove Elementary, Mirror Lake Elementary, Olympic View Elementary, Star Lake Elementary, and Wildwood Elementary. In addition to the school projects, the committee included a plan to modernize Memorial Stadium, which currently supports athletic activities for all schools. The rebuilding of the schools will create additional capacity for students at the elementary and high school levels. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 75 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 3 INTRODUCTION, continued The District continues to monitor factors that may have an impact on enrollment and capacity at our schools. In accordance with the McCleary decision, the State has provided funding to reduce K-3 class size to 17 and 4-12 class size to 25. Beginning in 2019-20 the legislature expects compliance with this funding adding pressure to the need for elementary capacity. In response to this need the district has acquired a commercial building to renovate into classrooms to provide permanent additional capacity. We will also continue to study school boundaries as new housing and fluctuating populations impact specific schools. Some shifts in boundaries may be required in the coming years. At this time with more than 1,000 unhoused elementary students, boundary adjustments cannot resolve the need for additional capacity. The maps included in this Plan reflect the boundaries for the 2018-19 school year. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 76 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 4 SECTION 1 - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. A Financial Plan that shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization listed follows this. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 77 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 5 INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (K-5) Adelaide 1635 SW 304th St Federal Way 98023 Brigadoon 3601 SW 336th St Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 298th St Auburn 98001 Enterprise 35101 5th Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Green Gables 32607 47th Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308th St Auburn 98001 Lake Grove 303 SW 308th St Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35827 32nd Ave S Auburn 98001 Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Rd Federal Way 98003 Meredith Hill 5830 S 300th St Auburn 98001 Mirror Lake 625 S 314th St Federal Way 98003 Nautilus (K-8) 1000 S 289th St Federal Way 98003 Olympic View 2626 SW 327th St Federal Way 98023 Panther Lake 34424 1st Ave S Federal Way 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368th St Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 34600 12th Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Silver Lake 1310 SW 325th Pl Federal Way 98023 Star Lake 4014 S 270th St Kent 98032 Sunnycrest 24629 42nd Ave S Kent 98032 Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320th St Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42nd Ave S Auburn 98001 Wildwood 2405 S 300th St Federal Way 98003 Woodmont (K-8) 26454 16th Ave S Des Moines 98198 MIDDLE SCHOOLS (6-8) Federal Way Public Academy (6-10) 34620 9th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Illahee 36001 1st Ave S Federal Way 98003 Kilo 4400 S 308th St Auburn 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 314th St Federal Way 98023 Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Rd Federal Way 98003 Sequoyah 3450 S 360th ST Auburn 98001 Totem 26630 40th Ave S Kent 98032 TAF @ Saghalie (6-12) 33914 19th Ave SW Federal Way 98023 HIGH SCHOOLS (9-12) Decatur 2800 SW 320th St Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 30611 16th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288th St Auburn 98001 Todd Beamer 35999 16th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Career Academy at Truman 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 ADDITIONAL SCHOOLS Internet Academy (K-12) 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Employment Transition Program (12+) 33250 21st Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Federal Way Open Doors 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Former DeVry Property (K-5) 3600 S 344th Way, Federal Way 98001 6.D.b Packet Pg. 78 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 6 CURRENT INVENTORY NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Developed Property Central Kitchen 1214 S 332nd Federal Way 98003 Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308th St Federal Way 98003 Educational Services Center 33330 8th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Support Services Center 1211 S 332nd St Federal Way 98003 Leased Property Early Learning Center at Uptown Square 1066 S 320th St Federal Way 98003 Undeveloped Property Site # Location 75 SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW – 9.2 Acres 65 S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S – 8.8 Acres 60 E of 10th Avenue SW - SW 334th & SW 335th Streets - 10.04 Acres 73 N of SW 320th and east of 45th PL SW – 23.45 Acres 71 S 344th Street & 46th Avenue S - 17.47 Acres 82 1st Way S and S 342nd St – Minimal acreage 96 S 308th St and 14th Ave S – .36 Acres Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 79 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 7 NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES PHASE EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS On- going Purchase and Relocate Portables Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is Impact Fees. II Thomas Jefferson High School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Voter Approved Capital bond II Illahee Middle School Replace Existing Building Voter Approved Capital bond II Totem Middle School Replace Existing Building Voter Approved Capital bond II Lake Grove Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Voter Approved Capital bond II Mark Twain Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD, pending SCAP funding II Mirror Lake Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Voter Approved Capital bond II Olympic View K-8 School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Voter Approved Capital bond II Star Lake Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Voter Approved Capital bond II Wildwood Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Voter Approved Capital bond II Memorial Stadium Replace Existing Facility Voter Approved Capital bond II DeVry Property Temp Swing School Increase Capacity SCAP and K-3 Class size reduction funding III Decatur High School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Kilo Middle School Replace Existing Building TBD III Sacajawea Middle School Replace Existing Building TBD III Adelaide Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Brigadoon Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Camelot Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Lake Dolloff Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Nautilus K-8 School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Twin Lakes Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Woodmont K-8 School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD As part of the multi-phase modernization and replacement plan, the District intends to increase capacity for elementary and high school students with expansion at the Thomas Jefferson, Lake Grove, Mirror Lake, Olympic View, Star Lake, and Wildwood sites. Only projects in Phase II with plans to increase capacity are included in the impact fee calculation for this plan. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 80 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 8 NEEDS FORECAST - ADDITIONAL FACILITIES NEW FACILITY LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS No current plans for additional facilities. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 81 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 9 Six Year Finance Plan Secured Funding Sources Impact Fees (1)($25,452) Land Sale Funds (2)($2,740,437) Bond or Levy Funds (3)$151,122,032 School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) (4)$3,463,273 TOTAL $151,819,416 Projected Revenue Sources School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) (5)$122,500,000 K-3 Class Size Reduction (6)$23,000,000 Bond Funds (7)$300,000,000 Land Fund Sales (8)$0 Impact Fees (9)$1,800,000 TOTAL $447,300,000 Actual and Planned Expenditures Total Secured Funding and Projected Revenue $599,119,416 NEW SCHOOLS Estimated and Budget 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2026 Total Total Cost Prior Years 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-2025 2025-2026 2019-2025 MODERNIZATION AND EXPANSION Lake Grove Elementary (10)$6,400,000 $26,300,000 $6,900,000 $33,200,000 $39,600,000 Mirror Lake Elementary (10)$7,400,000 $26,300,000 $6,900,000 $33,200,000 $40,600,000 Star Lake Elementary (10)$2,000,000 $3,600,000 $9,200,000 $25,300,000 $38,100,000 $40,100,000 Wildwood Elementary (10)$6,200,000 $26,300,000 $6,900,000 $33,200,000 $39,400,000 Olympic View K-8 School (10)$2,500,000 $25,900,000 $41,700,000 $70,100,000 $70,100,000 Thomas Jefferson High School (10)$1,200,000 $4,400,000 $40,000,000 $92,000,000 $136,400,000 $137,600,000 Totem Middle School (10)$2,000,000 $6,000,000 $22,700,000 $36,200,000 $64,900,000 $66,900,000 Illahee Middle School (10)$6,600,000 $28,900,000 $47,100,000 $82,600,000 $82,600,000 Former DeVry/ES 24 (11)$13,000,000 $23,000,000 $23,000,000 $36,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SITE ACQUISITION Norman Center $1,885,000 $240,000 $240,000 $2,125,000 (Employment Transtion Program) (12) TEMPORARY FACILITIES Portables (13)$600,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,800,000 $1,800,000 TOTAL $40,085,000 $116,740,000 $92,800,000 $153,700,000 $9,300,000 $55,000,000 $89,000,000 $200,000 $516,740,000 $556,825,000 NOTES:` 1. These fees are currently being held in a King County, City of Federal Way, City of Auburn, and City of Kent impact fee account, and will be available for use by the District for system improvements. This is year end balance on 12/31/18. 2. This is year end balance on 12/31/18. 3. This is the 12/31/18 balance of bond funds and capital levy funds. This figure includes interest earnings. 4. This represents the balance of SCAP funding from FWHS. Expected to be fully spent by the time of final close-out. 5. This is anticipated SCAP for the future projects authorized by the voters in 2017. 6. This is a secured K-3 Class size reduction grant. 7. In November 2017, the District passed a $450M bond measure. The amount included in the finance plan is for projects that will create additional capacity. Only the costs associated with increasing capacity are included in school impact fee calculations. See page 28 8. There are no projected sale of surplus properties. 9. These are projected fees based upon anticipated residential developments in the District, $25,000 per month over the next 6 years. 10. Project budgets are updated as of April 2019 and reflective of actual Guaranteed Price Maximums and total project budgets for Lake Grove, Mirror Lake, Wildwood and DeVry 11. A former private university campus located in Federal Way was purchased this year to provide up to 43 additional permanent elementary classrooms. Prior to creating new permanent capcity this location will be used as a temporary housing. These costs are excluded from impact fee calculations. 12. Norman Center was purchased in 2010 to house the Employment Transition Program. The $2.1 M purchase has been financed through a state approved LOCAL program through 2020. Please note the costs for this added capacity have been removed from the fee calculation as of 2020. 13. These fees represent the cost of purchasing and installing new portables. The portable expenditure in future years may replace existing portables that are not functional. These may not increase capacity and are not included in the capacity summary. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 82 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 10 SECTION 2 - MAPS Federal Way Public Schools has twenty-one elementary schools (grades K-5), two schools with a K-8 grade configuration, six middle school schools (grades 6-8), four high schools (grades 9-12) and four small secondary schools. The Federal Way Public Academy serves students in grades 6-10. The programs at Open Doors and Career Academy at Truman High School serves students in grades 9-12. In addition to these programs, TAF@Saghalie serves students in grades 6-12 who reside within the service area and the Employment and Transition Program (ETP) at the Norman Center serves 18-21 year old scholars. The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School districts are different. If the district does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single development. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the district and is not taken lightly. It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. The final map included represents the city and county boundaries which overlap with the district’s service areas. • City of Algona • City of Auburn • City of Des Moines • City of Federal Way • City of Kent • City of Milton • Unincorporated King County 6.D.b Packet Pg. 83 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 11 MAP – CITY AND COUNTY JURISDICTIONS 6.D.b Packet Pg. 84 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 12 SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities - The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast – 2020 through 2026 6.D.b Packet Pg. 85 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 13 BUILDING CAPACITIES This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District’s “standard of service” in order to ascertain the District’s current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. In general, the District’s current target class size provides that the average class size for a standard classroom for grades K through 3 should be 17 students to comply with current legislation. In grades 4-5 the target is 25 students. For grades 6 to 12 the target class size is 26 students. Classrooms for students with Individualized Education Program (Special Education) needs are calculated at 12 seats per classroom. Historically, the District has used the OSPI square footage calculation as a baseline for capacity calculation and made adjustments for specific program needs. The District will continue to use this calculation for determining capacity at our middle and high schools. However, for elementary schools capacity will be calculated based on the number of classroom spaces and the number of students assigned to each classroom. Class Size Guidelines FWPS Historical “Standard of Service” HB2661/SHB2776 Enacted Law Square Footage Guideline Kindergarten 18.9 17 25-28 Grades 1-2 18.9 17 25-28 Grade 3 18.9 17 28 Grades 4-5 25 25 28 For the purposes of determining student capacity at individual schools, the following list clarifies adjustments to classroom spaces and the OSPI calculation. Special Education Resource Rooms: Each middle school requires the use of a standard classroom(s) for special education students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. English as a Second Language Programs: Each middle school and high school requires the use of a standard classroom for students learning English as a second language. Middle School Computer Labs: Each middle school has computer labs, except Totem Middle School. Wireless access has been installed at all secondary schools. If additional classroom space is needed, these computer labs may be converted to mobile carts. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 86 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 14 BUILDING CAPACITIES, continued High School Career Development and Learning Center (Resource) Room: Each high school provides special education resource room and career development classrooms for students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. Preschool/ECEAP/Headstart: Our district currently offers preschool programs for both special needs & typically developing students at 9 elementary schools. We also have ECEAP and Headstart program at 10 sites (4 elementary schools, 1 middle school, 2 high schools, and 2 commercial sites). These programs decrease capacity at those schools. Alternative Learning Experience: Federal Way offers students the opportunity to participate in an Alternative Learning Experience through our Internet Academy. These students have never been included in the capacity calculation of unhoused students. 1418 Youth Reengagement: Federal Way offers students the opportunity to participate in 1418 Youth Reengagement Open Doors program. These students are housed at the Truman campus but are not currently included in the capacity calculation of unhoused students. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 87 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 15 BUILDING CAPACITIES, continued 6.D.b Packet Pg. 88 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 16 PORTABLE LOCATIONS The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not an efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as interim measures to house students when increasing population impacts a school attendance area. Portables may also be required to house students when new or changing programs require additional capacity. They also provide housing for students until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. With the launch of construction of new schools, a number of portables will be relocated, decommissioned, or sold. These numbers are not available at this time. The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 89 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 17 6.D.b Packet Pg. 90 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 18 STUDENT FORECAST Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students. The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on birth rates within the district’s census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted. A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level. The Enrollment MasterTM software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment. In February 2018, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District. The report was complete in March 2018. The model used to forecast next year’s enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county-wide average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections. The long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes in the 5-19 age group for King County. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 91 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 19 STUDENT FORECAST, continued Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of something else (e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend for the school-age population over time. The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2026. This model produces a projection that is between 21,500 and 25,000 when applied to the low, medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models. Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington. Near term projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by current local economic conditions. The District tracks new development from five permitting jurisdictions. Long range planning assumes a student yield from proposed new housing consistent with historical growth patterns. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school district community in the future. In school year 2018-19, King County as a whole experienced unusual enrollment patterns. We continue to monitor this closely. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 92 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 20 STUDENT FORECAST, continued 6.D.b Packet Pg. 93 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 21 SECTION 4 – KING COUNTY, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, AND CITY OF KENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Capacity Summaries Site & Construction Costs Allocations Student Generation Rates Impact Fee Calculations Reference to Impact Fee Calculations 6.D.b Packet Pg. 94 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 22 CAPACITY SUMMARIES All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information, Portable Capacity information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The District has recently adjusted its capacity calculation method for Elementary schools to better show capacity needed to comply with the K-3 Class Size Reduction. This adjustment is also shown in the portable capacity calculation. In order to allow for flexibility in portable usage the District will use an average class size calculation of 21 for each Elementary portable and an average class size of 25 for each Middle and High School portable. The information is organized with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, middle school, and high school levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 95 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 23 CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued Capacity Summary – All Grades 6.D.b Packet Pg. 96 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 24 CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued Capacity Summary – Elementary Schools 6.D.b Packet Pg. 97 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 25 CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued Capacity Summary – Middle Schools 6.D.b Packet Pg. 98 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 26 CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued Capacity Summary – High Schools 6.D.b Packet Pg. 99 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 27 IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Single and Multi-Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substantially adopted by the City of Auburn, Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that district. Impact Fee Calculation On page 30, the 2019 variables for the calculation of the Impact Fee for single family and multi-family units based on King County Code 21A and the Growth Management Act, generate the results below: Plan Year 2019 Plan Year 2020 Single Family Units $7,221 $5,035 Multi-Family Units $19,454 $20,768 Mixed-Use Residential 1 $9,727 $10,384 Impact Fee Calculation - King County Code 21A The Impact Fees have changed as a result of changes in several factors. The updates made to the variables in the Impact Fee calculation, generate a change in the Impact Fee between the 2019 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2020 Capital Facilities Plan. A summary of these changes can be found on page 32 and a year over year comparison of formula variables can be found on page 33. 1 In accordance with the City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 100 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 28 IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS, continued Impact Fee Calculations 6.D.b Packet Pg. 101 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 29 REFERENCES TO IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS SCHOOL ACQUISITION COST The district purchased the Norman Center to house the Employment Transition Program and to allow for the expansion of the ECEAP program. The purchase and use of this site increased our high school permanent capacity by 51 students. This cost is removed for 2020 because the last payment is due December 2019. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COST With voter approval of the $450,000,000 bond package, design work is underway for six of the approved projects. Anticipated construction budgets (based on the Maximum Allowable Construction Cost or MACC) have been updated to reflect the current construction market, and capacity has been fine-tuned. In addition, a credit for the cost of new construction is incorporated to recognize the K-3 Class Size Reduction Grant obtained by Federal Way Public Schools. It is estimated this $23 million grant will be reimbursed in six equal payments – a portion for each of the six schools serving K-3 students. The following table outlines the facility cost included in the impact fee calculation: Elementary Schools Lake Grove Mirror Lake Star Lake Wildwood Elementary TOTAL Permanent Capacity 353 404 387 472 1616 New Capacity 600 600 525 600 2325 Increased Capacity as % 43.9% MACC $29,482,200 $30,226,700 $29,854,450 $29,333,300 $118,896,650 Proportionate Share $ 52,164,434 K-3 Class Size Credit ($ 11,598,151) Net Proportionate Share $ 40,566,283 Two additional projects are within this horizon, but not yet included – Olympic View K-8 and Mark Twain Elementary. These costs will be incorporated into future Capital Facilities Plans. Current Middle School capacity calculations do not reflect unhoused students, so no costs associated with Illahee Middle School or Totem Middle School are included. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 102 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 30 Consistent with the capacity calculations described earlier, the District uses the OSPI square footage calculation for determining capacity at our secondary schools. Based on this methodology, the following construction costs for Thomas Jefferson High School are allocated as the proportionate share: REFERENCES TO IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS, continued Square Footage Capacity at 130 sq. ft. Current: 179,119 1378 Planned: 210,000 1615 Increased Capacity 237 Increase as % 17.24% MACC $102,443,200 Proportionate Share $ 17,661,713 The District will use the above formulas created as a base for future Capital Facilities Plans during the life of the current bond authorization. The capacity of these schools may vary from year to year as programs are added or changed and construction cost may increase over time. FACILITIES CAPACITY Permanent Facility Capacity: Changes to the Building Program Capacities calculation are found on page 15. Capacity Summaries: The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 22-26. Student Generation Factor Analysis: Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single-family units and multi-family units. The factors used in the 2019 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single-family units and multi-family units that were constructed in the District in the last five (5) years and can be found on the next page Temporary Facility Cost: The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on pages 16 and 17. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 103 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 31 Single Family Student Generation Number of Number of Number of Number of Elementary Middle School High School Total Single Family Elementary Middle School High School Student Student Student Student DEVELOPMENT Dwellings Students Students Students Factor Factor Factor Factor 18-Retreat Meadows 6 4 1 2 0.5714 0.1429 0.2857 1.0000 18-Wyncrest II 26 2 0 4 0.2857 0.0000 0.5714 0.8571 18-Soundview Manor 7 4 6 4 0.5714 0.8571 0.5714 1.9999 17-Eagle Manor 12 4 1 0 0.3333 0.0833 0.0000 0.4166 17-Lakehaven Estates 13 1 1 1 0.0769 0.0769 0.0769 0.2307 17-Hibbford Glen 15 2 0 4 0.1333 0.0000 0.2667 0.4000 17-Vista Pointe 105 15 6 8 0.1429 0.0571 0.0762 0.2762 16-Jefferson Place 11 4 0 0 0.3636 0.0000 0.0000 0.3636 16-Star Lake East 30 8 7 6 0.2667 0.2333 0.2000 0.7000 15-Swan Song 29 12 6 8 0.1053 0.0526 0.0702 0.2281 15-Wynstone East 114 10 5 14 0.0877 0.0439 0.1228 0.2544 Total 368 66 33 51 Student Generation*0.1793 0.0897 0.1386 0.4076 Multi-Family Student Generation - City of Federal Way Number of Number of Number of Number of Elementary Middle School High School Total Multi Family Elementary Middle School High School Student Student Student Student DEVELOPMENT Dwellings Students Students Students Factor Factor Factor Factor (17) Uptown Square 308 138 71 77 0.4481 0.2305 0.2500 0.9286 (17) Kitt's Corner 216 170 59 65 0.7870 0.2731 0.3009 1.3611 (16) Kandila Townhomes 27 4 8 1 0.1481 0.2963 0.0370 0.4815 (15) Park 16 293 182 110 120 0.6212 0.3754 0.4096 1.4061 Total 844 494 248 263 Student Generation*0.5853 0.2938 0.3116 1.1908 * Student Generation rate is based on totals. STUDENT GENERATION RATES New Construction in Prior 5 Years 6.D.b Packet Pg. 104 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 32 IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2019 TO 2020 6.D.b Packet Pg. 105 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e This document is published by the Business Services Department of the Federal Way Public Schools. May 2019 In an environment of high expectations, high support, and no excuses, the staff of Federal Way Public Schools will continually learn, lead, utilize data, and collaborate to ensure our scholars have a voice, a dream, and a bright future. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 106 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2019 through 2025 Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors June 24, 2019 Auburn School District No. 408 6.D.b Packet Pg. 107 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Ray Vefik Laura Theimer Laurie Bishop (253) 931-4900 City of Pacific City of Algona City of Kent City of Black Diamond Dr. Alan Spicciati, Superintendent BOARD of DIRECTORS Ryan Van Quill Robyn Mulenga 915 Fourth Street NE Auburn, Washington 98002 Unincorporated King County City of Auburn Serving Students in: 6.D.b Packet Pg. 108 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Section I Executive Summary ……………………Page 1 Section II Enrollment Projections…………………Page 6 Section III Standard of Service……………………Page 8 Section IV Inventory of Facilities……………………Page 16 Section V Pupil Capacity……………………………Page 20 Section VI Capital Construction Plan………………Page 23 Section VII Impact Fees………………………………Page 27 Section VIII Appendices…………………………..…Page 31 Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Page 32 Appendix A.2 - Capital Facilities Plan Projections Page 45 Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey Page 50 Table of Contents 6.D.b Packet Pg. 109 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2019 through 2025 Section I Executive Summary 6.D.b Packet Pg. 110 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e 2 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2019 through 2025 I. Executive Summary This six-year Capital Facilities Plan (the “Plan”) has been prepared by the Auburn School District (the “District”) as the District’s principal planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington’s Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This Plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2019. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District’s needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic long-range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period; other factors and trends in the use of facilities; and other needs of the District as may be required. However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this six-year Capital Facilities Plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and within the City of Auburn and City of Kent; the King County Council, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction’s respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of Algona, Pacific, and Black Diamond, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act and the local ordinances, this Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. The Plan establishes the District’s “standard of service” in order to ascertain the District’s current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the District’s specific needs. In general, the District’s current standard provides that class size for grades K-3 should not exceed 17 students and class size for grades 4-5 should not exceed 25 students. When averaged over the six elementary grades, this computes to 19.67 students per classroom. Class size for grades 6-12 should not exceed 30 students, with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers. Decisions by current legislative actions may create the need for additional classrooms. (See Section III for more specific information.) The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The District’s 2018-19 capacity was 14,226. The actual number of individual students was 16,949 as of October 1, 2018. (See Section V for more specific information.) 6.D.b Packet Pg. 111 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e 3 The Capital Construction Plan shown in Section VI addresses the additions and proposed modernization to the District’s existing facilities. The plan includes the replacement of five elementary schools and one middle school, construction of two new elementary schools, and acquisition of future school sites to accommodate growth. The new facilities are required to meet the projected elementary school class size reductions mandated by the State of Washington and student population increases generated by the large development areas within the Auburn School District. Three areas that have significant impact on the school district are the Lakeland South, Lea Hill, and the Auburn west hill and valley areas of the district. There are other pockets of development that impact the District as well. The District completed a comprehensive review of all district facilities in October 2008. A Steering Committee made recommendations to the Board for capital improvements to existing facilities and replacement of seven schools over the next ten years. These recommendations led to a capital improvements levy and a bond issue that was placed on the ballot in March 2009. Both ballot measures were unsuccessful in March. The Board determined to rerun only the capital improvements levy in November 2009, which the voters approved. In the fall of 2011, the Board determined to move forward with the Auburn High School Modernization and Reconstruction Project and placed the project before the voters in February of 2012. The bond issue was supported by the community at nearly 57% approval rate, but was short of the super majority requirement of 60%. In March of 2012, the Board determined to rerun the bond in November of 2012. In November 2012, the bond passed at 62%. The project was completed during the summer of 2016. In the spring of 2016, the Board determined to move forward with the replacement of six schools and the construction of two new elementary schools. The project was placed before the voters in November 2016 and the bond passed at 62.83%. The first of the projects, the replacement of Olympic Middle School, started construction in May 2018 and will open in Fall 2019. Construction of new Elementary School #15 started in May 2019 and construction for the replacement of Dick Scobee Elementary School will start in June 2019. The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the fiscal impacts incurred by a district experiencing growth and development. Section VII sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multi-family dwelling units. The student generation factors have been developed using the students who actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and multi-family developments constructed in the last five years. There have been dramatic changes in the student generation factors for single and multi-family in the past five years. The District plans to carefully monitor the numbers over the next several years to determine if this is a trend or an anomaly. The method of collecting the data is with the use of GIS mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County GIS, data from Davis Demographics and integration of the mapping with student data from the District’s student data system. This method gives the District actual student generation numbers for each grade span for identified developments. This data is contained in Appendix A.3. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 112 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2019 through 2025 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2018 Capital Facilities Plan that are a part of the 2019 Plan. The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference. Section I Executive Summary A. Updated to reflect new information within the Plan. B. Summary level list of changes from previous year. Section II Enrollment Projections A. Updated projections. See Appendices A.1 & A.2. Section III Standard of Service A. Updated to reflect current number of classrooms allocated to non-standard classroom uses. Section IV Inventory of Facilities A. Add 4 portables at Lea Hill Elementary School. B. Add 1 portable at Ilalko Elementary School. C. Add 1 portable at Mt. Baker Middle School. D. Add 2 portables at Rainier Middle School. E. Remove 7 portables from Dick Scobee Elementary School. F. Remove 1 portable from Pioneer Elementary School. Section V Pupil Capacity The eight portables to be relocated in July 2019 are needed to accommodate enrollment increases. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 113 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2019 through 2025 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 Impact Fees CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2018 to 2019 CPF CPF 2018 2019 EXPLANATION Student Generation Factors Single Family Consistent with King County Ordinance 11621, Elementary 0.2340 0.2370 Student Generation Factors are calculated Middle School 0.0970 0.0960 by the school district based on district Sr. High 0.1230 0.1280 records of average actual student generation Multi-Family rates for new developments constructed Elementary 0.2190 0.3820 over the last five years. Middle School 0.1070 0.1530 Sr. High 0.1060 0.1510 School Construction Costs Elementary $60,200,000 $60,200,000 Site Acquisition Costs Cost per acre $344,240 $385,083 Updated estimate based on 10% annual inflation Area Cost Allowance Boeckh Index $225.97 $225.97 Updated to current OSPI schedule. (July 2018) Match % - State 64.99%64.99%Updated to current OSPI schedule (May 2018) Match % - District 35.01%35.01%Computed District Average AV Single Family $373,974 $366,092 Updated from March 2019 King County Dept of Assessments data. Multi-Family $139,135 $161,495 Updated from March 2019 King County Dept of Assessments data using average AV for apartments and condominiums. Debt Serv Tax Rate $2.41 $2.05 Current Fiscal Year GO Bond Int Rate 3.27%4.09%Current Rate (Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-14) Section VIII Appendices Appendix A.1 - Updated enrollment projections from October 1, 2018 Appendix A.2 - Updated enrollment projections with anticipated buildout schedule from April 2019 Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey April 2019 DATA ELEMENTS From new school construction cost estimate in April 2019. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 114 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2019 through 2025 Section II Enrollment Projections 6.D.b Packet Pg. 115 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2019 through 2025 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 7 The Auburn School District uses a modified cohort survival model to project future enrollment for all of the District's operations. Table II.1 is an extract from the comprehensive projection model found in Appendix A.2 titled "CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections". This Table shows the anticipated enrollment for the next six years based on the previous six year history of the District under the assumptions set forth in the comprehensive projections, Appendix A.1, and the projection for additional students generated from new developments in the district as shown in Appendix A.2. TABLE ASD ENROLLMENT II.1 PROJECTIONS (April 2019) 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-2024 2024-2025 GRADE Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected KDG 1272 1300 1327 1355 1382 1410 1438 1 1290 1316 1343 1371 1399 1426 1454 2 1311 1312 1337 1365 1393 1420 1448 3 1276 1325 1326 1352 1379 1407 1435 4 1378 1303 1352 1353 1379 1406 1434 5 1345 1395 1320 1369 1370 1396 1423 K - 5 7872 7951 8005 8165 8302 8465 8632 6 1275 1345 1395 1320 1369 1369 1395 7 1231 1296 1366 1416 1341 1390 1391 8 1213 1245 1310 1380 1430 1355 1404 6 - 8 3719 3886 4071 4116 4140 4114 4190 9 1372 1385 1417 1482 1552 1602 1527 10 1313 1386 1399 1430 1496 1565 1615 11 1296 1297 1369 1383 1414 1480 1549 12 1377 1356 1357 1429 1443 1474 1540 9 - 12 5358 5424 5542 5724 5905 6121 6231 TOTALS 16,949 17,261 17,618 18,005 18,347 18,700 19,053 GRADES K-12 Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected K-5 7872 7951 8005 8165 8302 8465 8632 6-8 3719 3886 4071 4116 4140 4114 4190 9-12 5358 5424 5542 5724 5905 6121 6231 K-12 16,949 17,261 17,618 18,005 18,347 18,700 19,053 6.D.b Packet Pg. 116 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2019 through 2025 Section III Standard of Service 6.D.b Packet Pg. 117 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2019 through 2025 STANDARD OF SERVICE 9 The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent indicate that each school district must establish a "Standard of Service" in order to ascertain the overall capacity to house its projected student population. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage "capacity" guidelines for computing state funding support. The fundamental purpose of the SPI guidelines is to provide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching funds for school construction projects. By default these guidelines have been used to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population. The SPI guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, facility configurations, emerging educational reform, or the dynamics of each student's educational program. The Auburn School District Standard of Service addresses those local considerations that require space in excess of the SPI guidelines. The effect on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation pattern. Conditions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without accompanying computations. OVERVIEW The Auburn School District operates fourteen elementary schools housing 7,872 students in grades K through 5. The four middle schools house 3,719 students in grades 6 through 8. The District operates three comprehensive senior high schools and one alternative high school, housing 5,358 students in grades 9 through 12. CLASS SIZE The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the student population. Specialists create additional space needs. Class sizes are subject to collective bargaining agreements. Changes to class size agreements can have significant impact on available space. The current pupil/teacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 19.67 students per teacher. Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 19.67 students per room at grades K - 5. At grades 6 - 12 the limit is set at 30 students per room. The SPI space allocation for each grade articulation level, less the computed reduction for the Auburn School District Standard of Service, determines the District's capacity to house projected pupil populations. These reductions are shown below by grade articulation level. STRUCTURED LEARNING FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate to severe disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses 14 classrooms to provide for 105 students. The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPI space guidelines. No loss of capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to total elementary population. PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates an adaptive behavior program for students with behavior disabilities at the elementary school level. The program uses two classrooms to provide for 21 students. The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space allocations. (Two classrooms @ 19.67 - 11 = 8.67) Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 8.67 each =(17) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 8.67 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(17) ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS 6.D.b Packet Pg. 118 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2019 through 2025 STANDARD OF SERVICE 10 SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities. Seventeen standard classrooms are required to house this program. The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space guidelines. Continued loss of capacity is expected as growth in program is larger than the total elementary population. Loss of Permanent Capacity 9 (17-8) rooms @ 19.67 each =(177) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(177) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the elementary level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 19.67 each =(20) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(20) EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a pre-school program for young children below age five with disabilities. This program is housed at seven different elementary schools and currently uses 12 standard classrooms. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 12 rooms @ 19.67 each =(236) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(236) READING LABS The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional language arts instruction. These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces if available in each elementary school. Four elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available, thus they are housed in a standard classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 19.67 each =(79) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(79) MUSIC ROOMS The Auburn School District elementary music programs require one acoustically-modified classroom at each school for music instruction. The housing requirements are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 19.67 each =(275) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(275) 6.D.b Packet Pg. 119 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2019 through 2025 STANDARD OF SERVICE 11 ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates pullout programs at the elementary school level for students learning English as a second language. This program requires 30 standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 30 rooms @ 19.67 each =(590) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(590) SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for eight highly-impacted elementary schools. This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade level and do not receive other services. This program requires eight standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 19.67 each =(157) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(157) ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a learning specialist program to increase literacy skills for first and second graders. This program model was originally created from the I-728 funds and currently has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms, as well as pulling out students into designated classrooms. The district is utilizing classrooms at all fourteen elementary schools. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 19.67 each =(275) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(275) EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates an ECEAP program for 246 pre-school aged children in twelve sections of half-day length and one full-day program. The program is housed at three elementary schools and three off-site locations and utilizes three standard elementary classrooms and four additional classroom spaces and four auxiliary office spaces. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 19.67 each =(138) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(138) 6.D.b Packet Pg. 120 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2019 through 2025 STANDARD OF SERVICE 12 SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level. This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific disabilities. Ten classrooms are required at the middle school level to provide for approximately 290 students. The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the SPI space guidelines. PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior disabilities. The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses two classrooms. One of the two classrooms for this program are provided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 rooms @ 30 each =(30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (30) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates four structured learning classrooms at the middle school level for students with moderate to severe disabilities. Two of the four classrooms for this program are provided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 30 each =(60) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (60) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the middle school level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 30 each =(30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (30) ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for English Language Learner students. This program requires eight standard classrooms that are not provide for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each =(240) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (240) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. SPI Report #3 dated 12/14/11 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the mid-level facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each =(240) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (240) MIDDLE SCHOOLS 6.D.b Packet Pg. 121 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2019 through 2025 STANDARD OF SERVICE 13 NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the high school level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 30 each =(30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (30) SENIOR HIGH COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District support standard allows for one open computer lab at each of the senior high schools. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each =(120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at three comprehensive high schools for English Language Learner students. This program requires nine standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 9 rooms @ 30 each =(270) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (270) PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior diabilities. The program is housed at one of the high schools and uses one classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 30 each =(30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (30) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates eleven structured learning center classrooms for students with moderate to severe disabilities. This program is housed at two high schools requiring standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 11 rooms @ 30 each =(330) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (330) SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 6.D.b Packet Pg. 122 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2019 through 2025 STANDARD OF SERVICE 14 SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities. The current high school program requires 15 classrooms to provide program to meet educational needs of the students. The SPI space guidelines provide for one of the 15 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 30 each =(420) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (420) PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center. The SPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity. This space was not intended for, nor is it usable for, classroom instruction. It was constructed to provide a community center for the performing arts. Using SPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet computes to 208 unhoused students or 8.33 classrooms. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8.33 rooms @ 30 each =(250) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. There are 185 teaching stations available in the senior high facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 10 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 30 each =(300) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (300) STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS ELEMENTARY Loss of Permanent Capacity (1,965) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,965) MIDDLE SCHOOL Loss of Permanent Capacity (600) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (600) SENIOR HIGH Loss of Permanent Capacity (1,750) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,750) TOTAL Loss of Permanent Capacity (4,315) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (4,315) 6.D.b Packet Pg. 123 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2019 through 2025 Section IV Inventory of Facilities 6.D.b Packet Pg. 124 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2019 through 2025 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES 17 Table IV.1 shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OSPI rated capacities. Table IV.2 shows the number and location of each portable unit by school. The district uses relocatable facilities to: 1. provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting, 2. make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique student needs, and 3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on existing physical plants. Core facilities (i.e. gymnasiums, restrooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc.) are not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable classrooms. District School Facilities Building Capacity Acres Address Elementary Schools Washington Elementary 494 5.33 20 E Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Terminal Park Elementary 415 6.09 1101 D Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Dick Scobee Elementary 484 8.90 1031 14th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Pioneer Elementary 441 8.40 2301 M Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Chinook Elementary 461 10.99 3502 Auburn Way South, Auburn WA, 98092 Lea Hill Elementary 450 20.24 30908 124th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Gildo Rey Elementary 566 10.05 1005 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Evergreen Heights Elem. 463 10.10 5602 South 316th, Auburn WA, 98001 Alpac Elementary 505 10.68 310 Milwaukee Boulevard North, Pacific WA, 98047 Lake View Elementary 581 16.44 16401 Southeast 318th Street, Auburn WA, 98092 Hazelwood Elementary 594 13.08 11815 Southeast 304th Street, Auburn WA, 98092 Ilalko Elementary 592 14.23 301 Oravetz Place Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Lakeland Hills Elementary 594 12.00 1020 Evergreen Way SE, Auburn WA, 98092 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 614 10.02 29205 132nd Street SE, Auburn WA, 98092 ELEMENTARY CAPACITY 7,254 Middle Schools Cascade Middle School 837 16.94 1015 24th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Olympic Middle School 996 17.45 839 21st Street SE, Auburn WA, 98002 Rainier Middle School 843 25.54 30620 116th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Mt. Baker Middle School 837 30.00 620 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3,513 Senior High Schools West Auburn HS 233 5.26 401 West Main Street, Auburn WA, 98001 Auburn HS 2,127 23.74 711 East Main Street, Auburn WA, 98002 Auburn Riverside HS 1,387 35.32 501 Oravetz Road, Auburn WA, 98092 Auburn Mountainview HS 1,443 39.42 28900 124th Ave SE, Auburn WA, 98092 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5,190 TOTAL CAPACITY 15,957 Table Permanent Facilities IV.1 @ OSPI Rated Capacity (March 2019) 6.D.b Packet Pg. 125 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e 6.D.b Packet Pg. 126 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2019 through 2025 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES 19 TABLE TEMPORARY/RELOCATABLE IV.2 FACILITIES INVENTORY (June 2019) Elementary Location 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 Washington 6 6 8 9 9 9 9 Terminal Park 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 Dick Scobee 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pioneer 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 Chinook 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 Lea Hill 13 13 0 0 0 0 0 Gildo Rey 7 8 9 9 9 9 9 Evergreen Heights 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Alpac 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 Lake View 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Hazelwood 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 Ilalko 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 Lakeland Hills Elementary 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 4 6 6 6 6 6 6 TOTAL UNITS 78 77 63 58 58 58 58 TOTAL CAPACITY 1,534 1,515 1,239 1,141 1,141 1,141 1,141 Middle School Location 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 Cascade 0 0 3 4 4 4 4 Olympic 0 0 2 3 3 3 3 Rainier 7 7 8 9 9 9 9 Mt. Baker 10 10 10 11 11 11 11 TOTAL UNITS 17 17 23 27 27 27 27 TOTAL CAPACITY 510 510 690 810 810 810 810 Sr. High School Location 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 West Auburn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Auburn High School 0 0 2 3 3 3 3 Auburn High School - *TAP 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Auburn Riverside 13 13 14 14 14 14 14 Auburn Mountainview 4 5 8 8 8 8 8 TOTAL UNITS 18 19 25 26 26 26 26 TOTAL CAPACITY 540 570 750 780 780 780 780 *TAP - Transition Assistance Program for 18-21 year old students with special needs. COMBINED TOTAL UNITS 113 113 111 111 111 111 111 COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY 2,584 2,595 2,679 2,731 2,731 2,731 2,731 6.D.b Packet Pg. 127 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2019 through 2025 Section V Pupil Capacity 6.D.b Packet Pg. 128 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2019 through 2025 PUPIL CAPACITY 21 While the Auburn School District uses the SPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from which to determine space needs, the District's educational program requires more space than that provided for under the formula. This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in Section III, Standard of Service. The District's capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional space to house its programs. Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new funded facilities. The combined effect of these adjustments is shown on Line B in Tables V.1 and V.2 below. Table V.1 shows the Distict's capacity with relocatable units included and Table V.2 without these units. Table V.1 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-2025 2025-2026 A.SPI Capacity 15,957 15,957 16,773 17,632 18,021 18,256 18,256 A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 650 650 A.2 SPI Capacity-Replacements 166 209 389 235 B.Capacity Adjustments (1,731)(1,720)(1,636)(1,584)(1,584)(1,584)(1,584) C.Net Capacity 14,226 15,053 15,996 16,437 16,672 16,672 16,672 D.ASD Enrollment 17,261 17,618 18,005 18,347 18,700 19,053 19,365 3/E.ASD Surplus/Deficit (3,035)(2,565)(2,009)(1,910)(2,028)(2,381)(2,693) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Include Relocatable 2,584 2,595 2,679 2,731 2,731 2,731 2,731 2/Exclude SOS (pg 14)(4,315)(4,315)(4,315)(4,315)(4,315)(4,315)(4,315) Total Adjustments (1,731)(1,720)(1,636)(1,584)(1,584)(1,584)(1,584) Table V.2 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-2025 2025-2026 A.SPI Capacity 15,957 15,957 16,773 17,632 18,021 18,256 18,256 A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 650 650 A.2 SPI Capacity-Replacements 0 166 209 389 235 B.Capacity Adjustments (4,315)(4,315)(4,315)(4,315)(4,315)(4,315)(4,315) C.Net Capacity 11,642 12,458 13,317 13,706 13,941 13,941 13,941 D.ASD Enrollment 17,261 17,618 18,005 18,347 18,700 19,053 19,365 3/E.ASD Surplus/Deficit (5,619)(5,160)(4,688)(4,641)(4,759)(5,112)(5,424) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS 2/Exclude SOS (pg 14)(4,315)(4,315)(4,315)(4,315)(4,315)(4,315)(4,315) Total Adjustments (4,315)(4,315)(4,315)(4,315)(4,315)(4,315)(4,315) 1/New facilities shown in 2019-20 through 2023-24 are funded by the 2016 School Bond Issue. 2/The Standard of Service represents 26.18% of SPI capacity. When new facilities are added the Standard of Service computations are decreased to 24.18% of SPI capacity. 3/Students beyond the capacity are accommodated in other spaces (commons, library, theater, shared teaching space). Capacity WITH relocatables Capacity WITHOUT relocatables 6.D.b Packet Pg. 129 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2019 through 2025 PUPIL CAPACITY 22 A.Elementary Schools Building 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Washington 494 494 494 494 494 494 494 Terminal Park 415 415 415 415 650 650 650 Dick Scobee 484 650 650 650 650 650 650 Pioneer 441 441 650 650 650 650 650 Chinook 461 461 461 650 650 650 650 Lea Hill 450 450 450 650 650 650 650 Gildo Rey 566 566 566 566 566 566 566 Evergreen Heights 463 463 463 463 463 463 463 Alpac 505 505 505 505 505 505 505 Lake View 581 581 581 581 581 581 581 Hazelwood 594 594 594 594 594 594 594 Ilalko 592 592 592 592 592 592 592 Lakeland Hills 594 594 594 594 594 594 594 Arthur Jacobsen 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 Elementary #15 650 650 650 650 650 650 Elementary #16 650 650 650 650 650 ELEMENTARY CAPACITY 7,254 8,070 8,929 9,318 9,553 9,553 9,553 B.Middle Schools Building 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Cascade 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 Olympic 996 996 996 996 996 996 996 Rainier 843 843 843 843 843 843 843 Mt. Baker 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3,513 3,513 3,513 3,513 3,513 3,513 3,513 C.Senior High Schools Building 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 West Auburn 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 Auburn 2,127 2,127 2,127 2,127 2,127 2,127 2,127 Auburn Riverside 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 Auburn Mountainview 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5,190 5,190 5,190 5,190 5,190 5,190 5,190 COMBINED CAPACITY 15,957 16,773 17,632 18,021 18,256 18,256 18,256 PERMANENT FACILITIES @ SPI Rated Capacity (March 2019) 6.D.b Packet Pg. 130 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2019 through 2025 Section VI Capital Construction Plan 6.D.b Packet Pg. 131 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2019 through 2025 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN 24 The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974 with the formation of a community wide citizens committee. The result of this committee's work was published in the document titled 'Guidelines for Development.' In 1985 the Board formed a second Ad Hoc citizens committee to further the work of the first and address the needs of the District for subsequent years. The work of this committee was published in the document titled 'Directions for the Nineties.' In 1995 the Board commissioned a third Ad Hoc citizens committee to make recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and physical facilities. The committee recommendations are published in the document titled 'Education Into The Twenty-First Century - - A Community Involved.' The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop plans for the implementation, funding, and deployment of technology throughout the District's programs. The 1996 Bond proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate technological applications. The 1998 Capital Levy provided funding to further deploy technology at a level sufficient to support program requirements in every classroom and department. In 2005 and 2014, replacement technology levies were approved to continue to support technology across all facets of the District’s teaching, learning and operations. In addition to the technology needs of the District, the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District must prepare for continued student enrollment growth. As stated in their report, "the District must pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible." The Ad Hoc recommendation included commentary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent rates of tax assessments. A proposition was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that provided $8,000,000 over six years to address some of the technology needs of the District; and $5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire school sites. During the 1997-98 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Dieringer School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population from an area that includes a large development known as Lakeland South. Lakeland South at that time was immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the Auburn School District. On June 16, 1998, the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Dieringer Boards of Directors. On June 22, 1998, the Auburn School Board adopted Resolution No. 933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 23, 1998, the Dieringer School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 24-97-98 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from Dieringer to Auburn containing most of the Lakeland South development and certain other undeveloped properties. Property for the third comprehensive high school was acquired in 1999. The Board placed the proposition to construction a new high school on the ballot four times. Each election was extremely close to passing. After the fourth failure a community meeting was held and from that meeting the Board determined need for further community study. In April of 2002, the Board formed a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two items and make recommendations to the Board in the Fall of 2002: a. A review of the conclusion and recommendations of 1985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees related to accommodating high school enrollment growth. This included the review of possible financing plans for new facilities. b. Develop recommendations for accommodating high school enrollment growth for the next 10 years if a new senior high school is not built. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 132 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2019 through 2025 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN 25 This committee recommended the Board place the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in February 2003. The February election approved the new high school at 68.71% yes votes. The school opened in the fall of 2005. In the fall of 2003, the Board directed the administration to begin the planning and design for Elementary #13 and Elementary #14. In the fall of 2004, the Board passed Resolution No. 1054 to place two elementary schools on the ballot in February 2005. The voters approved the ballot measure in February of 2005 at 64.72%. Lakeland Hills Elementary (Elementary #13) opened in the fall of 2006. Arthur Jacobsen Elementary (Elementary #14) is located in the Lea Hill area and opened in the fall of 2007. These two elementary schools were built to accommodate the housing growth in Lakeland Hills and Lea Hill areas of the school district. In the 2004-05 school year, the Board convened a sixth Citizen’s Ad Hoc committee to again study and make recommendations about the future impacts in the District. One of the areas of study was the need for New Facilities and Modernization. The committee made a number of recommendations including school size, the need for a new middle school, and to begin a capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities based upon criterion. During the 2005-06 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Kent School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population that will come from an area that includes a number of projected developments in the north Auburn valley. On May 17, 2006, the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Kent Boards of Directors. On June 14, 2006, the Kent School Board adopted Resolution No. 1225 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 26, 2006, the Auburn School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 1073 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from the Kent School District to the Auburn School District effective September 29, 2006. In October of 2008, after two years of review and study, a Steering Committee made recommendations to the Board regarding the capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities as recommended by the 2004-05 Citizen’s Ad Hoc Committee. These recommendations, based on specific criteria, led to the Board placing a school improvement bond and capital improvements levy on the ballot in March 2009. Voters did not approve either measure that would have updated 24 facilities and replaced three aging schools. The Board decided to place only a six- year Capital Levy on the ballot in November of 2009, which passed at 55.17%. The levy funded $46.4 million of needed improvement projects at 24 sites over the following seven school years. Planning for the replacement of aging schools was started with educational specifications and schematic design process for the replacement of Auburn High School. The District acquired a site for a future high school in 2008 and a second site for a future middle school in 2009. The District also continued efforts to acquire property around Auburn High School. The Special Education Transition Facility opened in February of 2010. This facility is designed for students with disabilities that are 18 to 21 years old. In the November 2012 election, the community supported the $110 million bond issue for the Auburn High School Modernization and Reconstruction Project at 62%. Construction began in February 2013. The entire new building was occupied by Auburn High School students and staff in the fall of 2015, with site improvements being completed during the 2015-16 school year. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 133 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2019 through 2025 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN 26 In January 2015, a citizen’s ad hoc committee was convened by direction of the Board to address growth and facilities. The major recommendations were to construct two new elementary schools in the next four years and to acquire 3 new elementary school sites as soon as possible. In the November 2016 election, the community supported the $456 million bond issue for the replacement of six schools and the construction of two new elementary schools at 62.83%. Construction for the replacement of Olympic Middle School began in May 2018 and will be completed in Fall 2019. Construction for New Elementary School #15 began in May 2019. Within the six-year period, the District is projecting 2,104 additional students. This increase in student population along with anticipated class-size reductions, will require the construction of two new elementary schools and acquiring one new elementary school site during the six-year window. The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years. The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population. 2019-25 Capital Construction Plan (May 2019) Projected Fund Project Timelines Project Funded Cost Source 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 24-25 25-26 All Facilities - Technology 2013 Yes $22,000,000 6 Year XX Modernization Cap. Levy 1/ Portable Relocation Yes $1,800,000 Impact Fees XX XX XX 1/ Property Purchase - 1 New Elementary Yes $7,500,000 Bond Impact Fee XX XX XX XX XX XX Multiple Facility Improvements Yes $46,400,000 Capital Levy XX XX 1/ Elementary #15 Yes $48,500,000 Bond Impact Fee XX const XX open 1/ Elementary #16 Yes $48,500,000 Bond Impact Fee XX plan XX const XX open 1/ Replacement of five Elementary Schools Yes $242,500,000 Bond XX const XX const XX const XX const XX open 1/ Replacement of one Middle School Yes $78,000,000 Bond XX open 1/ These funds may be secured through a combination of the 2016 Bond Issue, sale of real property, impact fees, and state matching funds. The District currently is eligible for state matching funds for new construction at the elementary school level and for modernization at the elementary and middle school levels. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 134 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2019 through 2025 Section VII Impact Fees 6.D.b Packet Pg. 135 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2019 through 2025 28 IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION (Spring 2019) Elementary #15 within 1 year period Elementary #16 within 2 year period I. SITE COST PER RESIDENCE Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Size) x Student Factor Site Cost/ Facility Student Generation Factor Cost/Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Family Elem (K - 5)15 $385,083 650 0.2370 0.3820 $2,106.11 $3,394.66 Middle Sch (6 - 8)25 $0 800 0.0960 0.1530 $0.00 $0.00 Sr High (9 - 12)40 $0 1500 0.1280 0.1510 $0.00 $0.00 $2,106.11 $3,394.66 II. PERMANENT FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCE Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Size) x Student Factor) x (Permanent to Total Square Footage Percentage) Facility Facility % Perm Sq Ft/Student Generation Factor Cost/Cost/ Single Family Cost Size Total Sq Ft Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Family Elem (K - 5)$60,200,000 650 0.9429 0.2370 0.3820 $20,696.36 $33,358.69 Mid Sch (6 - 8)$0 800 0.9429 0.0960 0.1530 $0.00 $0.00 Sr High (9 - 12)$0 1500 0.9429 0.1280 0.1510 $0.00 $0.00 $20,696.36 $33,358.69 III. TEMPORARY FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCE Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Size) x Student Factor) x (Temporary to Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Facility % Temp Sq Ft/Student Generation Factor Cost/Cost/ Single Family Cost Size Total Sq Ft Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Family Elem (K - 5)$180,000 19.67 0.0571 0.2370 0.3820 $123.85 $199.63 Mid Sch (6 - 8)$180,000 30 0.0571 0.0960 0.1530 $32.89 $52.42 Sr High (9 - 12)$180,000 30 0.0571 0.1280 0.1510 $43.86 $51.74 $200.59 $303.79 IV. STATE MATCH CREDIT PER RESIDENCE Formula: (Boeckh Index x SPI Footage x District Match x Student Factor) Boeckh SPI State Cost/Cost/ Index Footage Match Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Family Elem (K - 5)$225.97 90 64.99%0.2370 0.3820 $3,132.48 $5,048.97 Mid Sch (6 - 8)$0.00 117 64.99%0.0960 0.1530 $0.00 $0.00 Sr High (9 - 12)$0.00 130 64.99%0.1280 0.1510 $0.00 $0.00 $3,132.48 $5,048.98 Student Generation Factor 6.D.b Packet Pg. 136 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2019 through 2025 29 V. TAX CREDIT PER RESIDENCE Formula: Expressed as the present value of an annuity TC = PV(interest rate,discount period,average assd value x tax rate) Ave Resid Curr Dbt Serv Bnd Byr Indx Number of Tax Credit Tax Credit Assd Value Tax Rate Ann Int Rate Years Single Family Multi Family Single Family $366,092 $2.05 4.09%10 $6,059.95 Multi Family $161,495 $2.05 4.09%10 $2,673.24 VI. DEVELOPER PROVIDED FACILITY CREDIT Formula: (Value of Site or Facility/Number of dwelling units) Value No. of Units Facility Credit Single Family $0.00 1 $0.00 Multi Family $0.00 1 $0.00 FEE PER UNIT IMPACT FEES RECAP Single Multi SUMMARY Family Family Site Costs $2,106.11 $3,394.66 Permanent Facility Const Costs $20,696.36 $33,358.69 Temporary Facility Costs $200.59 $303.79 State Match Credit ($3,132.48)($5,048.98) Tax Credit ($6,059.95)($2,673.24) FEE (No Discount)$13,810.63 $29,334.91 FEE (50% Discount)$6,905.31 $14,667.45 Less ASD Discount $0.00 $0.00 Facility Credit $0.00 $0.00 Net Fee Obligation $6,905.31 $14,667.45 6.D.b Packet Pg. 137 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2019 through 2025 30 SINGLE FAMILY MULTI FAMILY IMPACT FEE ELEMENTS Elem Mid Sch Sr High Elem Mid Sch Sr High K - 5 6 - 8 9 - 12 K - 5 6 - 8 9 - 12 Student Factor Single Family - Auburn actual count April 2019 0.237 0.096 0.128 0.382 0.153 0.151 New Fac Capacity 650 800 1500 650 800 1500 New Facility Cost Elementary Cost Estimates April 2019 $60,200,000 $60,200,000 Temp Rm Capacity ASD District Standard of Service.19.67 30 30 19.67 30 30 Grades K - 5 @ 19.67 and 6 - 12 @ 30. Temp Facility Cost Relocatables, including site work, set up, and furnishing $180,000 $180,000 $180,000 $180,000 $180,000 $180,000 Site Acreage ASD District Standard or SPI Minimum 12 25 40 12 25 40 Site Cost/Acre See below $385,083 $385,083 $385,083 $385,083 $385,083 $385,083 Perm Sq Footage 14 Elementary, 4 Middle, and 4 High Schools 1,700,850 1,700,850 1,700,850 1,700,850 1,700,850 1,700,850 Temp Sq Footage 112 portables at 896 sq. ft. each + TAP 2661 103,013 103,013 103,013 103,013 103,013 103,013 Total Sq Footage Sum of Permanent and Temporary above 1,803,863 1,803,863 1,803,863 1,803,863 1,803,863 1,803,863 % - Perm Facilities Permanent Sq. Footage divided by Total Sq. Footage 94.29%94.29%94.29%94.29%94.29%94.29% % - Temp Facilities Temporary Sq. Footage divided by Total Sq. Footage 5.71%5.71%5.71%5.71%5.71%5.71% SPI Sq Ft/Student From SPI Regulations 90 117 130 90 117 130 Boeckh Index From SPI projection for July 2018 $225.97 $225.97 $225.97 $225.97 $225.97 $225.97 Match % - State From OSPI May 2018 64.99%64.99%64.99%64.99%64.99%64.99% Match % - District Computed 35.01%35.01%35.01%35.01%35.01%35.01% Dist Aver AV King County Department of Assessments March 2019 $366,092 $366,092 $366,092 $161,495 $161,495 $161,495 Debt Serv Tax Rate Current Fiscal Year $2.05 $2.05 $2.05 $2.05 $2.05 $2.05 G. O Bond Int Rate Current Rate - (Bond Buyer 20 Index March 2019)4.09%4.09%4.09%4.09%4.09%4.09% Site Cost Projections Recent Property Purchase Purchase Purchase Adjusted Projected Annual Sites Latest Date Projected Acquisitions Acreage Year Price Cost/Acre Present Day Inflation Factor Required of Acquisition Cost/Acre Elem. #16 Parcel 1 1.26 2019 $480,000 $382,166 $382,166 5.00%Elementary 2025 $491,474 Elem. #16 Parcel 2 8.19 2019 $2,959,561 $361,363 $361,363 2019 Annual Elem. #16 Parcel 3 0.80 2018 $460,000 $575,000 $632,500 Inflation Factor Total 10.25 $3,899,561 $380,593 $385,083 10.00% 6.D.b Packet Pg. 138 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2019 through 2025 Section VIII Appendix Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey 6.D.b Packet Pg. 139 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections 6.D.b Packet Pg. 140 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e 1 Auburn School District #408 Student Enrollment Projections October 2018 Introduction The projective techniques give some consideration to historical and current data as a basis for forecasting the future. In addition, the ‘projector’ must make certain assumptions about the operant variables within the data being used. These assumptions are “judgmental” by definition. Forecasting can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future, or from the known to the unknown. The attached tabular data reviews the history of student enrollment, sets out some quantitative assumptions, and provides projections based on these numerical factors. The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, psychological, economic, and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection. The logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today, and will be in the future. It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over thirteen years and six years respectively. The results provide a trend, which reflects a long (13-year) and a short (6-year) base from which to extrapolate. Two methods of estimating the number of kindergarten students have been used. The first uses the average increase or decrease over the past 13 and 6-year time frame and adds it to each succeeding year. The second derives what the average percentage Auburn kindergartners have been of live births in King County for the past 5 years and uses this to project the subsequent four years. The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact. This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections. Monitoring deviation is critical to the viability and credibility of the projections derived by these techniques. Tables Table 1 – Thirteen Year History of October 1 Enrollments – page 3 The data shown in this table is the baseline information used to project future enrollment. This data shows the past record of enrollment in the district on October 1 of each year. Table 2 – Historical Factors Used in Projections - page 4 This table shows the three basic factors derived from the data in Table 1. These factors have been used in the subsequent projections. The three factors are: • Factor 1 – Average Pupil Change Between Grade Levels This factor is sometimes referred to as the “holding power” or “cohort survival.” It is a measure of the number of pupils gained or lost as they move from one grade level to the next. • Factor 2 – Average Pupil Change by Grade Level This factor is the average change at each grade level over the 13 or 6-year period. • Factor 3 – Auburn School District Kindergarten Enrollment as a Function of King County Live Births. This factor calculates what percent each kindergarten class was of the King County live births in the five previous years. From this information has been extrapolated the kindergarten pupils expected for the next four years. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 141 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e 2 Table 3 – Projection Models – pages 5-13 This set of tables utilizes the above mentioned variables and generates several projections. The models are explained briefly below. Table 3.13 (pg 5) – shows a projection based on the 13-year average gain in kindergarten (Factor 2) and the 13-year average change between grade levels (Factor 1). The data is shown for the district as a whole. Table 3.6 (pg 5) – shows a projection using the same scheme as Table 3.13 except it shortens the historical data to only the most recent 6 years. Table 3.13A and 3.6A (pg 6) – uses the same factors above except Factor 3 is substituted for Factor 2. The kindergarten rates are derived from the King County live births instead of the average gain. Tables 3E.13, 3E.6, 3E.13A, 3E.6A (pg 7) – breaks out the K-5 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. Tables 3MS.13, 3MS.6, 3MS.13A, 3MS.6A (pg 8) – breaks out the 6-8 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. Tables 3SH.13, 3SH.6, 3SH.13A, 3SH.6A (pg 9) – breaks out the 9-12 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. Table 4 (pg 10) – Collects the four projection models by grade group for ease of comparison. 2019-20 and Beyond Forecast Summary This year is the seventh consecutive year of an increase in enrollment after three consecutive years of declining enrollment. The 2018-19 increase of 424 students changes our historical average gain/loss in students. Over the past 6 years the average gain is now 2.52% annually, which equates to an average annual gain of 392 students. Using the cohort survival models, the data below is a summary of the range of variation between the four models. This data can be used for planning for future needs of the district. The models show changes in the next six years: Elementary projections show an increase range of 759 to 809. (page 7) Middle School projections show an increase range of 471 to 645. (page 8) High School projections show an increase range of 873 to 1177. (page 9) The models show these changes looking forward thirteen years: Elementary projections show an increase range of 1,665 to 1,917. (page 7) Middle School projections show an increase range of 1,020 to 1,104. (page 8) High School projections show an increase range of 1,396 to 1,846. (page 9) This data does not factor new developments that are currently under construction or in the planning stages. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 142 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2018 prj18-19 Page 3 TABLE 1 Thirteen Year History of October 1 Enrollments Actual GRADE 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 GRADE KDG 941 996 998 1032 1010 1029 1098 1170 1232 1198 1237 1261 1272 KDG 1 1012 995 1015 1033 1066 1068 1089 1188 1219 1279 1210 1276 1290 1 2 1002 1019 1024 998 1016 1097 1083 1124 1196 1289 1300 1252 1311 2 3 1031 997 1048 993 1013 996 1111 1125 1136 1232 1317 1328 1276 3 4 1049 1057 1044 1073 1024 1022 1038 1123 1156 1170 1237 1329 1378 4 5 998 1078 1069 1030 1079 1018 1070 1075 1122 1172 1199 1269 1345 5 6 1058 1007 1096 1040 1041 1063 1041 1076 1059 1116 1152 1207 1275 6 7 1014 1057 1034 1125 1060 1032 1086 1072 1091 1099 1132 1194 1231 7 8 1072 1033 1076 1031 1112 1046 1017 1116 1088 1136 1108 1183 1213 8 9 1372 1337 1256 1244 1221 1273 1200 1159 1275 1229 1261 1258 1372 9 10 1400 1368 1341 1277 1238 1170 1278 1229 1169 1316 1248 1300 1313 10 11 1322 1352 1350 1303 1258 1233 1164 1240 1211 1167 1318 1249 1296 11 12 1147 1263 1352 1410 1344 1316 1321 1274 1323 1260 1226 1419 1377 12 TOTALS 14,418 14,559 14,703 14,589 14,482 14,363 14,596 14,971 15,277 15,663 15,945 16,525 16,949 Percent of Gain 0.98%0.99%(0.78)%(0.73)%(0.82)%1.62%2.57%2.04%2.53%1.80%3.64%2.57% Student Gain 141 144 (114)(107)(119)233 375 306 386 282 580 424 Average % Gain for 1st 6 years.0.21%Average % Gain for last 6 years 2.52% Average Student Gain for 1st 6 yea 30 Average Student Gain for last 6 years 392 Average % Gain for 13 years.1.37% Average Student Gain for 13 years.211 TABLE 1A Grade Group Combinations 18-19 KDG 941 996 998 1032 1010 1029 1098 1170 1232 1198 1237 1261 1272 K,1,2 2955 3010 3037 3063 3092 3194 3270 3482 3647 3766 3747 3789 3873 K - 5 6033 6142 6198 6159 6208 6230 6489 6805 7061 7340 7500 7715 7872 K - 6 7091 7149 7294 7199 7249 7293 7530 7881 8120 8456 8652 8922 9147 1 - 3 3045 3011 3087 3024 3095 3161 3283 3437 3551 3800 3827 3856 3877 1 - 5 5092 5146 5200 5127 5198 5201 5391 5635 5829 6142 6263 6454 6600 1 - 6 6150 6153 6296 6167 6239 6264 6432 6711 6888 7258 7415 7661 7875 6 - 8 3144 3097 3206 3196 3213 3141 3144 3264 3238 3351 3392 3584 3719 7 - 8 2086 2090 2110 2156 2172 2078 2103 2188 2179 2235 2240 2377 2444 7 - 9 3458 3427 3366 3400 3393 3351 3303 3347 3454 3464 3501 3635 3816 9 - 12 5241 5320 5299 5234 5061 4992 4963 4902 4978 4972 5053 5226 5358 10 - 12 3869 3983 4043 3990 3840 3719 3763 3743 3703 3743 3792 3968 3986 6.D.b Packet Pg. 143 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2018 prj18-19 Page 4 Factor Average Student Change Between Factor 1 Grade Levels 3 CALENDA R YEAR TOTAL LIVE BIRTHS 2/3 RD BIRTHS 1/3RD BIRTHS YEAR OF ENROLL ADJ LIVE BIRTHS KDG ENROLL 1980 16,800 11,200 5,600 1986-87 17,000 829 4.876% K to 1 43.83 K to 1 53.20 1981 17,100 11,400 5,700 1987-88 18,349 769 4.191% 1 to 2 21.58 1 to 2 42.20 1982 18,811 12,541 6,270 1988-89 18,626 817 4.386% 2 to 3 14.33 2 to 3 34.00 1983 18,533 12,355 6,178 1989-90 18,827 871 4.626% 3 to 4 27.00 3 to 4 28.80 1984 18,974 12,649 6,325 1990-91 19,510 858 4.398% 4 to 5 17.00 4 to 5 25.80 1985 19,778 13,185 6,593 1991-92 19,893 909 4.569% 5 to 6 (0.50)5 to 6 (4.40)1986 19,951 13,301 6,650 1992-93 21,852 920 4.210% 6 to 7 21.42 6 to 7 33.60 1987 22,803 15,202 7,601 1993-94 21,624 930 4.301% 7 to 8 13.58 7 to 8 34.00 1988 21,034 14,023 7,011 1994-95 24,062 927 3.853% 8 to 9 172.25 8 to 9 181.20 1989 25,576 17,051 8,525 1995-96 26,358 954 3.619% 9 to 10 13.50 9 to 10 38.60 1990 26,749 17,833 8,916 1996-97 24,116 963 3.993% 10 to 11 (16.08)10 to 11 (11.80)1991 22,799 15,199 7,600 1997-98 20,973 978 4.663% 11 to 12 59.83 11 to 12 106.00 1992 20,060 13,373 6,687 1998-99 21,573 854 3.959% total 387.75 total 561.20 1993 22,330 14,887 7,443 1999-00 22,129 849 3.837% 1994 22,029 14,686 7,343 2000-01 24,013 912 3.798% Factor Average Student Change By 1995 25,005 16,670 8,335 2001-02 22,717 846 3.724% 2 Grade Level 1996 21,573 14,382 7,191 2002-03 21,622 905 4.186% 1997 21,646 14,431 7,215 2003-04 22,023 922 4.186% 1998 22,212 14,808 7,404 2004-05 22,075 892 4.041% K 27.58 K 20.40 1999 22,007 14,671 7,336 2005-06 22,327 955 4.277% 1 23.17 1 20.40 2000 22,487 14,991 7,496 2006-07 22,014 941 4.274% 2 25.75 2 37.40 2001 21,778 14,519 7,259 2007-08 21,835 996 4.562% 3 20.42 3 30.20 2002 21,863 14,575 7,288 2008-09 22,242 998 4.487% 4 27.42 4 51.00 2003 22,431 14,954 7,477 2009-10 22,726 1032 4.541% 5 28.92 5 54.00 2004 22,874 15,249 7,625 2010-11 22,745 1010 4.441% 6 18.08 6 39.80 2005 22,680 15,120 7,560 2011-12 23,723 1029 4.338% 7 18.08 7 31.80 2006 24,244 16,163 8,081 2012-13 24,683 1098 4.448% 8 11.75 8 19.40 2007 24,902 16,601 8,301 2013-14 25,094 1162 4.631% 9 0.00 9 42.60 2008 25,190 16,793 8,397 2014-15 25,101 1232 4.908%Last 5 10 (7.25)10 16.80 2009 25,057 16,705 8,352 2015-16 24,695 1198 4.851%year 11 (2.17)11 11.20 2010 24,514 16,343 8,171 2016-17 24,591 1237 5.030%Average 12 19.17 12 20.60 2011 24,630 16,420 8,210 2017-18 24,898 1261 5.065%4.990% 2012 25,032 16,688 8,344 2018-19 24,951 1272 Actual 5.098% 2013 24,910 16,607 8,303 2019-20 25,202 1258 <--Prjctd 2014 25,348 16,899 8,449 2020-21 25,441 1270 <--Prjctd 2015 25,487 16,991 8,496 2021-22 25,836 1289 <--Prjctd 2016 26,011 17,341 8,670 2022-23 25,520 1274 <--Prjctd 2017 25,274 16,849 8,425 2023-24 *number from DOH Source: Center for Health Statistics, Washington State Department of Health Factor 2 is the average change in grade level size. 13 YEAR BASE 6 YEAR BASE TABLE 2 Factors Used in Projections 13 YEAR BASE 6 YEAR BASE Factor 1 is the average gain or loss of students as they move from one grade level to the next. Factor 1 uses the past 12 or 6 years of changes. AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT KINDERGARTEN ENROLLMENTS AS A FUNCTION OF KING COUNTY BIRTH RATES AUBURN KINDERGARTEN ENROLLMENT AS A % OF ADJUSTED LIVE BIRTHS 6.D.b Packet Pg. 144 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2018 prj18-19 Page 5 TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS 3.13 Based on 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2030-31 KDG 1272 1300 1327 1355 1382 1410 1438 1465 1493 1520 1548 1575 1603 1631 1 1290 1316 1343 1371 1399 1426 1454 1481 1509 1537 1564 1592 1619 1647 2 1311 1312 1337 1365 1393 1420 1448 1475 1503 1531 1558 1586 1613 1641 3 1276 1325 1326 1352 1379 1407 1435 1462 1490 1517 1545 1572 1600 1628 4 1378 1303 1352 1353 1379 1406 1434 1462 1489 1517 1544 1572 1599 1627 5 1345 1395 1320 1369 1370 1396 1423 1451 1479 1506 1534 1561 1589 1616 6 1275 1345 1395 1320 1369 1369 1395 1423 1450 1478 1506 1533 1561 1588 7 1231 1296 1366 1416 1341 1390 1391 1417 1444 1472 1499 1527 1555 1582 8 1213 1245 1310 1380 1430 1355 1404 1404 1430 1458 1485 1513 1541 1568 9 1372 1385 1417 1482 1552 1602 1527 1576 1577 1603 1630 1658 1685 1713 10 1313 1386 1399 1430 1496 1565 1615 1540 1590 1590 1616 1644 1671 1699 11 1296 1297 1369 1383 1414 1480 1549 1599 1524 1574 1574 1600 1628 1655 12 1377 1356 1357 1429 1443 1474 1540 1609 1659 1584 1633 1634 1660 1687 TOTALS 16,949 17,259 17,618 18,004 18,345 18,700 19,051 19,365 19,636 19,885 20,237 20,567 20,923 21,282 Percent of Gain 1.83%2.08%2.19%1.89%1.94%1.88%1.64%1.40%1.27%1.77%1.63%1.74%1.71% Student Gain 310 359 386 341 355 351 313 271 249 352 330 357 359 TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS 3.6 Based on 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2030-31 KDG 1272 1292 1313 1333 1354 1374 1394 1415 1435 1456 1476 1496 1517 1537 1 1290 1325 1346 1366 1386 1407 1427 1448 1468 1488 1509 1529 1550 1570 2 1311 1332 1367 1388 1408 1429 1449 1469 1490 1510 1531 1551 1571 1592 3 1276 1345 1366 1401 1422 1442 1463 1483 1503 1524 1544 1565 1585 1605 4 1378 1305 1374 1395 1430 1451 1471 1491 1512 1532 1553 1573 1593 1614 5 1345 1404 1331 1400 1421 1456 1476 1497 1517 1538 1558 1578 1599 1619 6 1275 1341 1399 1326 1395 1416 1452 1472 1492 1513 1533 1554 1574 1594 7 1231 1309 1374 1433 1360 1429 1450 1485 1506 1526 1546 1567 1587 1608 8 1213 1265 1343 1408 1467 1394 1463 1484 1519 1540 1560 1580 1601 1621 9 1372 1394 1446 1524 1589 1648 1575 1644 1665 1700 1721 1741 1762 1782 10 1313 1411 1433 1485 1562 1628 1687 1614 1683 1704 1739 1759 1780 1800 11 1296 1301 1399 1421 1473 1551 1616 1675 1602 1671 1692 1727 1748 1768 12 1377 1402 1407 1505 1527 1579 1657 1722 1781 1708 1777 1798 1833 1854 TOTALS 16,949 17,426 17,898 18,385 18,795 19,203 19,580 19,899 20,173 20,409 20,738 21,019 21,299 21,564 Percent of Gain 2.81%2.71%2.72%2.23%2.17%1.96%1.63%1.38%1.17%1.61%1.35%1.33%1.25% Student Gain 477 472 487 410 408 377 319 274 236 329 281 280 265 GRADE GRADE 6.D.b Packet Pg. 145 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2018 prj18-19 Page 6 TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS 3.13A Based on Birth Rates & 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2030-31 K 1272 1258 1270 1289 1274 1 1290 1316 1302 1313 1333 1317 2 1311 1312 1337 1323 1335 1355 1339 3 1276 1325 1326 1352 1337 1349 1369 1353 4 1378 1303 1352 1353 1379 1364 1376 1396 1380 5 1345 1395 1320 1369 1370 1396 1381 1393 1413 1397 6 1275 1345 1395 1320 1369 1369 1395 1381 1393 1413 1397 7 1231 1296 1366 1416 1341 1390 1391 1417 1402 1414 1434 1418 8 1213 1245 1310 1380 1430 1355 1404 1404 1430 1416 1428 1448 1432 9 1372 1385 1417 1482 1552 1602 1527 1576 1577 1603 1588 1600 1620 1604 10 1313 1386 1399 1430 1496 1565 1615 1540 1590 1590 1616 1602 1614 1633 11 1296 1297 1369 1383 1414 1480 1549 1599 1524 1574 1574 1600 1586 1598 12 1377 1356 1357 1429 1443 1474 1540 1609 1659 1584 1633 1634 1660 1645 TOTALS 16,949 17,217 17,519 17,839 18,071 Percent of Gain 1.58%1.75%1.83%1.30% Student Gain 268 302 320 232 TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS 3.6A Based on Birth Rates & 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2030-31 KDG 1272 1258 1270 1289 1274 1 1290 1325 1311 1323 1343 1327 2 1311 1332 1367 1353 1365 1385 1369 3 1276 1345 1366 1401 1387 1399 1419 1403 4 1378 1305 1374 1395 1430 1416 1428 1448 1432 5 1345 1404 1331 1400 1421 1456 1442 1454 1473 1458 6 1275 1341 1399 1326 1395 1416 1452 1437 1449 1469 1453 7 1231 1309 1374 1433 1360 1429 1450 1485 1471 1483 1503 1487 8 1213 1265 1343 1408 1467 1394 1463 1484 1519 1505 1517 1537 1521 9 1372 1394 1446 1524 1589 1648 1575 1644 1665 1700 1686 1698 1718 1702 10 1313 1411 1433 1485 1562 1628 1687 1614 1683 1704 1739 1725 1737 1756 11 1296 1301 1399 1421 1473 1551 1616 1675 1602 1671 1692 1727 1713 1725 12 1377 1402 1407 1505 1527 1579 1657 1722 1781 1708 1777 1798 1833 1819 TOTALS 16,949 17,391 17,820 18,263 18,593 Percent of Gain 2.61%2.47%2.49%1.81% Student Gain 442 429 443 330 GRADE GRADE 6.D.b Packet Pg. 146 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2018 prj18-19 Page 7 TABLE 3E.13 K-5 PROJECTIONS - Based on 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2030-31 KDG 1272 1300 1327 1355 1382 1410 1438 1465 1493 1520 1548 1575 1603 1631 1 1290 1316 1343 1371 1399 1426 1454 1481 1509 1537 1564 1592 1619 1647 2 1311 1312 1337 1365 1393 1420 1448 1475 1503 1531 1558 1586 1613 1641 3 1276 1325 1326 1352 1379 1407 1435 1462 1490 1517 1545 1572 1600 1628 4 1378 1303 1352 1353 1379 1406 1434 1462 1489 1517 1544 1572 1599 1627 5 1345 1395 1320 1369 1370 1396 1423 1451 1479 1506 1534 1561 1589 1616 6 year 13 year K - 5 TOT 7872 7950 8006 8165 8302 8465 8631 8796 8962 9127 9293 9458 9624 9789 759 1917 Percent of Gain 1.00%0.70%1.98%1.67%1.97%1.96%1.92%1.88%1.85%1.81%1.78%1.75%1.72% Student Gain 78 56 159 137 164 165 166 166 166 166 166 165 166 TABLE 3E.6 K-5 PROJECTIONS - Based on 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2030-31 KDG 1272 1292 1313 1333 1354 1374 1394 1415 1435 1456 1476 1496 1517 1537 1 1290 1325 1346 1366 1386 1407 1427 1448 1468 1488 1509 1529 1550 1570 2 1311 1332 1367 1388 1408 1429 1449 1469 1490 1510 1531 1551 1571 1592 3 1276 1345 1366 1401 1422 1442 1463 1483 1503 1524 1544 1565 1585 1605 4 1378 1305 1374 1395 1430 1451 1471 1491 1512 1532 1553 1573 1593 1614 5 1345 1404 1331 1400 1421 1456 1476 1497 1517 1538 1558 1578 1599 1619 6 year 13 year K - 5 TOT 7872 8003 8096 8283 8421 8558 8681 8803 8925 9048 9170 9293 9415 9537 809 1665 Percent of Gain 1.67%1.16%2.30%1.67%1.63%1.43%1.41%1.39%1.37%1.35%1.33%1.32%1.30% Student Gain 131 93 187 138 137 122 122 122 122 122 122 122 122 TABLE 3E.13A K-5 PROJECTIONS - Based on Birth Rates and 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2030-31 K 1272 1258 1270 1289 1274 1 1290 1316 1302 1313 1333 1317 2 1311 1312 1337 1323 1335 1355 1339 3 1276 1325 1326 1352 1337 1349 1369 1353 4 1378 1303 1352 1353 1379 1364 1376 1396 1380 5 1345 1395 1320 1369 1370 1396 1381 1393 1413 1397 4 year K - 5 TOT 7872 7908 7907 8000 8028 156 Percent of Gain 0.46%(0.02)%1.18%0.35% Student Gain 36 (2)93 28 TABLE 3E.6A K-5 PROJECTIONS - Based on Birth Rates and 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2030-31 KDG 1272 1258 1270 1289 1274 1 1290 1325 1311 1323 1343 1327 2 1311 1332 1367 1353 1365 1385 1369 3 1276 1345 1366 1401 1387 1399 1419 1403 4 1378 1305 1374 1395 1430 1416 1428 1448 1432 5 1345 1404 1331 1400 1421 1456 1442 1454 1473 1458 4 year K - 5 TOT 7872 7969 8018 8161 8219 347 Percent of Gain 1.23%0.62%1.78%0.71% Student Gain 97 50 143 58 GRADE GRADE GRADE GRADE 6.D.b Packet Pg. 147 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2018 prj18-19 Page 8 TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3MS.13 Based on 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2030-31 6 1275 1345 1395 1320 1369 1369 1395 1423 1450 1478 1506 1533 1561 1588 7 1231 1296 1366 1416 1341 1390 1391 1417 1444 1472 1499 1527 1555 1582 8 1213 1245 1310 1380 1430 1355 1404 1404 1430 1458 1485 1513 1541 1568 6 year 13 year 6 - 8 TOT 3719 3886 4070 4115 4139 4114 4190 4244 4325 4408 4490 4573 4656 4739 471 1020 Percent of Gain 4.48%4.76%1.09%0.59%(0.61)%1.84%1.29%1.91%1.91%1.88%1.84%1.81%1.78% Student Gain 167 185 45 24 (25)76 54 81 83 83 83 83 83 TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3MS.6 Based on 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2030-31 6 1275 1341 1399 1326 1395 1416 1452 1472 1492 1513 1533 1554 1574 1594 7 1231 1309 1374 1433 1360 1429 1450 1485 1506 1526 1546 1567 1587 1608 8 1213 1265 1343 1408 1467 1394 1463 1484 1519 1540 1560 1580 1601 1621 6 year 13 year 6 - 8 TOT 3719 3914 4116 4167 4222 4239 4364 4441 4517 4578 4640 4701 4762 4823 645 1104 Percent of Gain 5.25%5.16%1.24%1.31%0.40%2.96%1.76%1.71%1.35%1.34%1.32%1.30%1.29% Student Gain 195 202 51 55 17 125 77 76 61 61 61 61 61 TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3MS.13A Based on Birth Rates & 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2030-31 6 1275 1345 1395 1320 1369 1369 1395 1381 1393 1413 1397 7 1231 1296 1366 1416 1341 1390 1391 1417 1402 1414 1434 1418 8 1213 1245 1310 1380 1430 1355 1404 1404 1430 1416 1428 1448 1432 6 year 10 year 6 - 8 TOT 3719 3886 4070 4115 4139 4114 4190 4202 4225 4243 4259 471 540 Percent of Gain 4.48%4.76%1.09%0.59%(0.61)%1.84%0.29%0.56%0.41%0.37% Student Gain 167 185 45 24 (25)76 12 23 17 16 TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3MS.6A Based on Birth Rates & 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2030-31 6 1275 1341 1399 1326 1395 1416 1452 1437 1449 1469 1453 7 1231 1309 1374 1433 1360 1429 1450 1485 1471 1483 1503 1487 8 1213 1265 1343 1408 1467 1394 1463 1484 1519 1505 1517 1537 1521 6 year 10 year 6 - 8 TOT 3719 3914 4116 4167 4222 4239 4364 4406 4439 4457 4472 645 753 Percent of Gain 5.25%5.16%1.24%1.31%0.40%2.96%0.96%0.74%0.39%0.36% Student Gain 195 202 51 55 17 125 42 33 17 16 GRADE GRADE GRADE GRADE 6.D.b Packet Pg. 148 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2018 prj18-19 Page 9 TABLE HIGH SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3HS.13 Based on 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2030-31 9 1372 1385 1417 1482 1552 1602 1527 1576 1577 1603 1630 1658 1685 1713 10 1313 1386 1399 1430 1496 1565 1615 1540 1590 1590 1616 1644 1671 1699 11 1296 1297 1369 1383 1414 1480 1549 1599 1524 1574 1574 1600 1628 1655 12 1377 1356 1357 1429 1443 1474 1540 1609 1659 1584 1633 1634 1660 1687 6 year 13 year 9-12 TOT 5358 5424 5542 5725 5904 6121 6231 6325 6349 6350 6454 6535 6644 6754 873 1396 Percent of Gain 1.22%2.18%3.30%3.14%3.67%1.80%1.51%0.39%0.01%1.63%1.26%1.66%1.66% Student Gain 66 118 183 180 217 110 94 25 1 103 82 109 110 TABLE HIGH SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3HS.6 Based on 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2030-31 9 1372 1394 1446 1524 1589 1648 1575 1644 1665 1700 1721 1741 1762 1782 10 1313 1411 1433 1485 1562 1628 1687 1614 1683 1704 1739 1759 1780 1800 11 1296 1301 1399 1421 1473 1551 1616 1675 1602 1671 1692 1727 1748 1768 12 1377 1402 1407 1505 1527 1579 1657 1722 1781 1708 1777 1798 1833 1854 6 year 13 year 9-12 TOT 5358 5508 5685 5934 6152 6406 6535 6655 6731 6783 6929 7026 7122 7204 1177 1846 Percent of Gain 2.80%3.21%4.39%3.66%4.13%2.01%1.84%1.14%0.78%2.15%1.40%1.37%1.15% Student Gain 150 177 249 217 254 129 120 76 52 146 97 96 82 TABLE HIGH SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3HS.13A Based on Birth Rates & 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2030-31 9 1372 1385 1417 1482 1552 1602 1527 1576 1577 1603 1588 1600 1620 1604 10 1313 1386 1399 1430 1496 1565 1615 1540 1590 1590 1616 1602 1614 1633 11 1296 1297 1369 1383 1414 1480 1549 1599 1524 1574 1574 1600 1586 1598 12 1377 1356 1357 1429 1443 1474 1540 1609 1659 1584 1633 1634 1660 1645 6 year 13 year 9-12 TOT 5358 5424 5542 5725 5904 6121 6231 6325 6349 6350 6412 6436 6479 6480 873 1122 Percent of Gain 1.22%2.18%3.30%3.14%3.67%1.80%1.51%0.39%0.01%0.97%0.37%0.67%0.02% Student Gain 66 118 183 180 217 110 94 25 1 61 24 43 2 TABLE SR. HIGH PROJECTIONS 3SH.6A Based on Birth Rates & 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2030-31 9 1372 1394 1446 1524 1589 1648 1575 1644 1665 1700 1686 1698 1718 1702 10 1313 1411 1433 1485 1562 1628 1687 1614 1683 1704 1739 1725 1737 1756 11 1296 1301 1399 1421 1473 1551 1616 1675 1602 1671 1692 1727 1713 1725 12 1377 1402 1407 1505 1527 1579 1657 1722 1781 1708 1777 1798 1833 1819 6 year 13 year 9-12 TOT 5358 5508 5685 5934 6152 6406 6535 6655 6731 6783 6894 6948 7000 7002 1177 1644 Percent of Gain 2.80%3.21%4.39%3.66%4.13%2.01%1.84%1.14%0.78%1.64%0.78%0.76%0.02% Student Gain 150 177 249 217 254 129 120 76 52 111 54 53 2 GRADE GRADE GRADE GRADE 6.D.b Packet Pg. 149 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2018 prj18-19 Page 10 TABLE PROJECTION COMPARISONS 4 BY GRADE GROUP ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2030-31 6 year 13 year E.13 1272 1300 1327 1355 1382 1410 1438 1465 1493 1520 1548 1575 1603 1631 166 359 E.6 1272 1292 1313 1333 1354 1374 1394 1415 1435 1456 1476 1496 1517 1537 122 265 E.13A 1272 1258 1270 1289 1274 E.6A 1272 1258 1270 1289 1274 ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2030-31 6 year 13 year E.13 6600 6651 6679 6810 6919 7055 7193 7331 7469 7607 7745 7883 8021 8159 593 1559 E.6 6600 6711 6784 6950 7067 7184 7286 7388 7490 7592 7694 7796 7898 8000 686 1400 E.13A 6600 6651 6637 6711 6754 E.6A 6600 6711 6749 6872 6946 ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2030-31 6 year 13 year MS.13 3719 3886 4070 4115 4139 4114 4190 4244 4325 4408 4490 4573 4656 4739 471 1020 MS.6 3719 3914 4116 4167 4222 4239 4364 4441 4517 4578 4640 4701 4762 4823 645 1104 MS.13A 3719 3886 4070 4115 4139 4114 4190 4202 4225 4243 4259 471 MS.6A 3719 3914 4116 4167 4222 4239 4364 4406 4439 4457 4472 645 GRADES ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 9-12 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2030-31 6 year 13 year HS.13 5358 5424 5542 5725 5904 6121 6231 6325 6349 6350 6454 6535 6644 6754 873 1396 HS.6 5358 5508 5685 5934 6152 6406 6535 6655 6731 6783 6929 7026 7122 7204 1177 1846 HS.13A 5358 5424 5542 5725 5904 6121 6231 6325 6349 6350 6412 6436 6479 6480 873 1122 HS.6A 5358 5508 5685 5934 6152 6406 6535 6655 6731 6783 6894 6948 7000 7002 1177 1644 DISTRICT TOTALS ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2030-31 6 year 13 year 3.13 16,949 17,259 17,618 18,004 18,345 18,700 19,051 19,365 19,636 19,885 20,237 20,567 20,923 21,282 2102 4333 3.6 16,949 17,426 17,898 18,385 18,795 19,203 19,580 19,899 20,173 20,409 20,738 21,019 21,299 21,564 2631 4615 3.13A 16,949 17,217 17,519 17,839 18,071 3.6A 16,949 17,391 17,820 18,263 18,593 K-12 KNDG GRADES 1-5 GRADES 6-8 6.D.b Packet Pg. 150 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2018 prj18-19 Page 11 TABLE 5 Total =October 1 Actual Count AND Projected Counts Prj 3.13 -13 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase Diff =Number Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase % =Percent Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Prj 3.6A - 6 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Grades 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 K - 5 Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff % ACTUAL 5774 xxx xxx 5735 xxx xxx 5887 xxx xxx 6033 xxx xxx 6208 xxx xxx Prj 3E.13 5655 (119)(2.06)%5761 26 0.45%5750 (137)(2.33)%5871 (162)(2.69)%6085 (123)(1.98)% Prj 3E.6 5662 (112)(1.94)%5821 86 1.50%5795 (92)(1.56)%5921 (112)(1.86)%6138 (70)(1.13)% Prj 3E.13A 5605 (169)(2.93)%5709 (26)(0.45)%5750 (137)(2.33)%5869 (164)(2.72)%6059 (149)(2.40)% Prj 3E.6A 5631 (143)(2.48)%5756 21 0.37%5784 (103)(1.75)%5912 (121)(2.01)%6094 (114)(1.84)% Grades 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 6 - 8 Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff % ACTUAL 3144 xxx xxx 3097 xxx xxx 3206 xxx xxx 3196 xxx xxx 3213 xxx xxx Prj 3MS.13 3185 (80)1.30%3214 117 3.78%3295 89 2.78%3131 (65)(2.03)%3107 (106)(3.30)% Prj 3MS.6 3192 (75)1.53%3216 119 3.84%3311 105 3.28%3146 (50)(1.56)%3116 (97)(3.02)% Prj 3MS.13A 3185 (80)1.30%3214 117 3.78%3295 89 2.78%3131 (65)(2.03)%3107 (106)(3.30)% Prj 3MS.6A 3192 (75)1.53%3216 119 3.84%3311 105 3.28%3146 (50)(1.56)%3116 (97)(3.02)% Grades 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 9 - 12 Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff % ACTUAL 5241 xxx xxx 5320 xxx xxx 5299 xxx xxx 5234 xxx xxx 5061 xxx xxx Prj 3SH.13 4577 (664)(12.67)%4630 (690)(12.97)%4783 (516)(9.74)%5085 (149)(2.85)%5190 129 2.55% Prj 3SH.6 4594 (647)(12.34)%4639 (681)(12.80)%4769 (530)(10.00)%5086 (148)(2.83)%5192 131 2.59% Prj 3SH.13A 4577 (664)(12.67)%4630 (690)(12.97)%4783 (516)(9.74)%5085 (149)(2.85)%5190 129 2.55% Prj 3SH.6A 4594 (647)(12.34)%4639 (681)(12.80)%4769 (530)(10.00)%5086 (148)(2.83)%5192 131 2.59% All 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 Grades Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff % ACTUAL 14,159 xxx xxx 14,152 xxx xxx 14,392 xxx xxx 14,463 xxx xxx 14,482 xxx xxx Prj 3.13 13,417 (742)(5.24)%13,605 (547)(3.87)%13,828 (564)(3.92)%14,087 (376)(2.60)%14,382 (100)(0.69)% Prj 3.6 13,448 (711)(5.02)%13,676 (476)(3.36)%13,875 (517)(3.59)%14,153 (310)(2.14)%14,446 (36)(0.25)% Prj 3.13A 13,367 (792)(5.59)%13,553 (599)(4.23)%13,828 (564)(3.92)%14,085 (378)(2.61)%14,356 (126)(0.87)% Prj 3.6A 13,417 (742)(5.24)%13,611 (541)(3.82)%13,864 (528)(3.67)%14,144 (319)(2.21)%14,402 (80)(0.55)% PROJECTION COMPARISONS BY GRADE GROUP 6.D.b Packet Pg. 151 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2018 prj18-19 Page 12 TABLE 5 Total =October 1 Actual Count AND Projected Counts Prj 3.13 -13 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase Diff =Number Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase % =Percent Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Prj 3.6A - 6 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Grades 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 K - 5 Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff % ACTUAL 6230 xxx xxx 6489 xxx xxx 6805 xxx xxx 7061 xxx xxx 7340 xxx xxx Prj 3E.13 6179 (51)(0.82)%6254 (235)(3.62)%6282 (523)(7.69)%6275 (786)(11.13)%6372 (968)(13.19)% Prj 3E.6 6237 7 0.11%6294 (195)(3.01)%6323 (482)(7.08)%6267 (794)(11.24)%6368 (972)(13.24)% Prj 3E.13A 6129 (101)(1.62)%6237 (252)(3.88)%6252 (553)(8.13)%6266 (795)(11.26)%6346 (994)(13.54)% Prj 3E.6A 6172 (58)(0.93)%6264 (225)(3.47)%6269 (536)(7.88)%6260 (801)(11.34)%6339 (1,001)(13.64)% Grades 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 6 - 8 Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff % ACTUAL 3141 xxx xxx 3144 xxx xxx 3264 xxx xxx 3238 xxx xxx 3351 xxx xxx Prj 3MS.13 3179 38 1.21%3242 98 3.12%3234 (30)(0.92)%3221 (17)(0.53)%3143 (208)(6.21)% Prj 3MS.6 3195 54 1.72%3243 99 3.15%3236 (28)(0.86)%3211 (27)(0.83)%3132 (219)(6.54)% Prj 3MS.13A 3179 38 1.21%3242 98 3.12%3234 (30)(0.92)%3221 (17)(0.53)%3143 (208)(6.21)% Prj 3MS.6A 3195 54 1.72%3243 99 3.15%3236 (28)(0.86)%3211 (27)(0.83)%3132 (219)(6.54)% Grades 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 9 - 12 Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff % ACTUAL 4992 xxx xxx 4963 xxx xxx 4902 xxx xxx 4978 xxx xxx 4972 xxx xxx Prj 3SH.13 5129 137 2.74%5074 111 2.24%4921 19 0.39%4901 (77)(1.55)%4813 (159)(3.20)% Prj 3SH.6 5155 163 3.27%5128 165 3.32%5027 125 2.55%5017 39 0.78%4906 (66)(1.33)% Prj 3SH.13A 5129 137 2.74%5074 111 2.24%4921 19 0.39%4901 (77)(1.55)%4813 (159)(3.20)% Prj 3SH.6A 5155 163 3.27%5129 166 3.34%5027 125 2.55%5017 39 0.78%4906 (66)(1.33)% All 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 Grades Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff % ACTUAL 14,363 xxx xxx 13,672 xxx xxx 14,971 xxx xxx 15,277 xxx xxx 15,663 xxx xxx Prj 3.13 13,499 (173)(6.02)%14,570 898 6.57%14,437 (534)(3.57)%14,397 (880)(5.76)%14,328 (1,335)(8.52)% Prj 3.6 13,542 (130)(5.72)%14,665 993 7.26%14,586 (385)(2.57)%14,495 (782)(5.12)%14,406 (1,257)(8.03)% Prj 3.13A 13,447 (225)(6.38)%14,553 881 6.44%14,407 (564)(3.77)%14,388 (889)(5.82)%14,302 (1,361)(8.69)% Prj 3.6A 13,510 (162)(5.94)%14,636 964 7.05%14,532 (439)(2.93)%14,488 (789)(5.16)%14,377 (1,286)(8.21)% BY GRADE GROUP (Continued) PROJECTION COMPARISONS 6.D.b Packet Pg. 152 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2018 prj18-19 Page 13 TABLE 5 Total =October 1 Actual Count AND Projected Counts Prj 3.13 -13 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase Diff =Number Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase % =Percent Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Prj 3.6A - 6 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Grades 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Average Average Historical Data is grouped by K - 5 Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Diff %K - 5, 6-8, 9-12 articulation ACTUAL 7500 xxx xxx 7715 xxx xxx 7872 xxx xxx xxx xxx pattern. Prj 3E.13 6659 (841)(11.21)%7052 (663)(8.59)%7329 (543)-6.90%(391)(5.52)% Prj 3E.6 6632 (868)(11.57)%7046 (669)(8.67)%7317 (555)-7.05%(368)(5.13)%Articulation pattern has no Prj 3E.13A 6643 (857)(11.43)%6979 (736)(9.54)%7194 (678)-8.61%(428)(6.06)%numeric impact on efficacy Prj 3E.6A 6611 (889)(11.85)%6966 (749)(9.71)%7169 (703)-8.93%(414)(5.80)%of projection models. Grades 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Average Average 6 - 8 Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Diff % ACTUAL 3392 xxx xxx 3584 xxx xxx 3719 xxx xxx xxx xxx Prj 3MS.13 3230 (162)(4.78)%3256 (328)(9.15)%3307 (412)-11.08%(82)(1.99)% Prj 3MS.6 3213 (179)(5.28)%3246 (338)(9.43)%3287 (432)-11.62%(82)(1.97)% Prj 3MS.13A 3230 (162)(4.78)%3256 (328)(9.15)%3307 (412)-11.08%(82)(1.99)% Prj 3MS.6A 3213 (179)(5.28)%3246 (338)(9.43)%3287 (432)-11.62%(82)(1.97)% Grades 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Average Average 9 - 12 Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Diff % ACTUAL 5053 xxx xxx 5226 xxx xxx 5358 xxx xxx xxx xxx Prj 3SH.13 4773 (280)(5.54)%4874 (352)(6.74)%4896 (462)-8.62%(227)(4.30)% Prj 3SH.6 4856 (197)(3.90)%4956 (270)(5.17)%4959 (399)-7.45%(178)(3.33)% Prj 3SH.13A 4773 (280)(5.54)%4874 (352)(6.74)%4896 (462)-8.62%(227)(4.30)% Prj 3SH.6A 4856 (197)(3.90)%4956 (270)(5.17)%4959 (399)-7.45%(178)(3.33)% All 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Average Average Grades Total Diff %Total Diff %Total Diff %Diff % ACTUAL 15,945 xxx xxx 16,525 xxx xxx 16949 xxx xxx xxx xxx Prj 3.13 14,662 (1,283)(8.05)%15,182 (1,343)(8.13)%15531 (1418)-8.37%(646)(4.47)% Prj 3.6 14,701 (1,244)(7.80)%15,248 (1,277)(7.73)%15563 (1386)-8.18%(578)(4.02)% Prj 3.13A 14,646 (1,299)(8.15)%15,109 (1,416)(8.57)%15396 (1553)-9.16%(683)(4.72)% Prj 3.6A 14,680 (1,265)(7.93)%15,168 (1,357)(8.21)%15415 (1534)-9.05%(621)(4.30)% PROJECTION COMPARISONS BY GRADE GROUP (Continued) 6.D.b Packet Pg. 153 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections 6.D.b Packet Pg. 154 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-April 2019 46 BASE DATA - BUILDOUT SCHEDULE Student Generation Factors ASSUMPTIONS:Single Multi- 1 Uses Build Out estimates received from developers. 2019 SF 2019 MF Family Family 2 Student Generation Factors are updated Auburn data for 2018 as allowed per King County Ordinance Elementary 0.2370 0.3260 Middle School 0.0960 0.1290 Senior High 0.1270 0.1480 Total 0.4600 0.6030 Table Auburn S.D. 1 Development 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total Single Family Units 100 120 150 140 170 120 80 880 Total Single Family Units 100 120 150 140 170 120 80 880 Projected Pupils: K-5 24 28 36 33 40 28 19 209 6-8 10 12 14 13 16 12 8 84 9-12 13 15 19 18 22 15 10 112 K-12 46 55 69 64 78 55 37 405 Multi Family Units 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Multi Family Units 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Projected Pupils: K-5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6-8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Housing Units 100 120 150 140 170 120 80 880 K-5 24 28 36 33 40 28 19 209 6-8 10 12 14 13 16 12 8 84 9-12 13 15 19 18 22 15 10 112 K-12 46 55 69 64 78 55 37 405 Cumulative Projection 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 24 52 88 121 161 190 209 10 21 36 49 65 77 84 13 28 47 65 86 102 112 46 101 170 235 313 368 405 Auburn Factors Elementary Pupils Mid School Pupils Sr. High Pupils Elementary Pupils Total Mid School Pupils Sr. High Pupils Elementary Pupils Mid School Pupils Total Total Sr. High Pupils Elementary - Grades K -5 Mid School - Grades 6 - 8 Senior High - Grades 9 - 12 Total 6.D.b Packet Pg. 155 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-April 2019 47 TABLE New Projects - Annual New Pupils Added & Distributed 2 by Grade Level 6 Year Percent of average GRADE Average Pupils by Grade 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2024-25 2025-26 2025-26 Enroll.& Level KDG 1228 7.73%1272 4 8 13 18 24 28 31 1 1244 7.83%1290 4 8 13 18 24 29 32 2 1245 7.84%46.46%1311 4 8 13 18 25 29 32 3 1236 7.78%1276 4 8 13 18 24 29 31 4 1232 7.76%1378 4 8 13 18 24 29 31 5 1197 7.53%1345 3 8 13 18 24 28 30 6 1148 7.22%1275 3 7 12 17 23 27 29 7 1137 7.15%21.55%1231 3 7 12 17 22 26 29 8 1141 7.18%1213 3 7 12 17 22 26 29 9 1259 7.92%1372 4 8 13 19 25 29 32 10 1263 7.95%31.98%1313 4 8 14 19 25 29 32 11 1247 7.85%1296 4 8 13 18 25 29 32 12 1313 8.26%1377 4 8 14 19 26 30 33 Totals 15888 100.00%Total 16949 46 101 170 235 313 368 405 TABLE 6 year Historical Data 3 Average Enrollment and Percentage Distributed by Grade Level Grade 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 6yr Ave % KDG 1170 1232 1198 1237 1261 1272 1228.33 7.73% 1 1188 1219 1279 1210 1276 1290 1243.67 7.83% 2 1124 1196 1289 1300 1252 1311 1245.33 7.84% 3 1125 1136 1232 1317 1328 1276 1235.67 7.78% 4 1123 1156 1170 1237 1329 1378 1232.17 7.76% 5 1075 1122 1172 1199 1269 1345 1197.00 7.53% 6 1076 1059 1116 1152 1207 1275 1147.50 7.22% 7 1072 1091 1099 1132 1194 1231 1136.50 7.15% 8 1116 1088 1136 1108 1183 1213 1140.67 7.18% 9 1159 1275 1229 1261 1258 1372 1259.00 7.92% 10 1229 1169 1316 1248 1300 1313 1262.50 7.95% 11 1240 1211 1167 1318 1249 1296 1246.83 7.85% 12 1274 1323 1260 1226 1419 1377 1313.17 8.26% Totals 14971 15277 15663 15945 16525 16949 15888.33 100.00% % of change 2.04%2.53%1.80%3.64%2.57% change +/- 306 386 282 580 424 6.D.b Packet Pg. 156 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-April 2019 48 TABLE 4 New Projects - Pupil Projection Cumulative ND 3.13 by Grade Level Updated April 2018 Uses a 'cohort survival'GRADE 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2024-25 2025-26 2025-26 model assuming 100% of Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected previous year new KDG 1272 1303 1335 1368 1400 1434 1466 1496 enrollees move to the next 1 1290 1319 1351 1384 1417 1451 1483 1513 grade level.2 1311 1315 1345 1378 1411 1445 1477 1507 3 1276 1329 1334 1365 1398 1431 1463 1494 Kindergarten calculates 4 1378 1307 1360 1366 1397 1431 1462 1493 previous years number plus 5 1345 1398 1328 1382 1388 1419 1451 1481 K-5 7872 7972 8053 8244 8411 8611 8802 8984 Current generation based on 6 1275 1348 1402 1332 1386 1392 1422 1452 % of total enrollment. Other 7 1231 1300 1373 1428 1358 1413 1417 1446 factor uses 100% cohort 8 1213 1248 1317 1392 1446 1377 1430 1433 survival, based on 6 year GR 6-8 3719 3895 4092 4152 4190 4182 4269 4331 history.9 1372 1389 1425 1496 1570 1627 1556 1608 10 1313 1389 1407 1444 1514 1590 1644 1572 11 1296 4 8 13 18 25 29 32 12 1377 1301 1378 1397 1434 1506 1580 1633 GR 9-12 5358 4082 4217 4350 4537 4747 4809 4845 Total 16949 15950 16363 16745 17137 17539 17880 18160 % of change -5.90%2.59%2.34%2.34%2.34%1.94%1.57% change +/- -1000 413 382 392 402 341 281 TABLE 5 New Projects - Pupil Projection Cumulative ND 3.6 by Grade Level Updated April 2018 Uses a 'cohort survival'GRADE 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2024-25 2025-26 2025-26 2022-23 2023-24 model assuming 100% of Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected previous year new KDG 1272 1296 1321 1346 1372 1398 1423 1446 1463 1479 enrollees move to the next 1 1290 1329 1354 1379 1405 1431 1456 1479 1496 1513 grade level.2 1311 1336 1375 1401 1427 1453 1478 1501 1518 1535 3 1276 1349 1374 1415 1440 1467 1491 1514 1532 1549 Kindergarten calculates 4 1378 1308 1382 1408 1448 1475 1500 1523 1540 1558 previous years number plus 5 1345 1407 1338 1412 1438 1480 1504 1527 1545 1562 K-5 7872 8025 8143 8362 8530 8704 8852 8991 9093 9196 Current generation based on 6 1275 1344 1407 1338 1412 1439 1478 1501 1518 1536 % of total enrollment. Other 7 1231 1312 1381 1445 1377 1451 1476 1514 1531 1549 factor uses 100% cohort 8 1213 1268 1350 1420 1484 1416 1489 1513 1530 1548 survival, based on 6 year GR 6-8 3719 3924 4138 4204 4273 4306 4444 4528 4580 4632 history.9 1372 1398 1454 1537 1608 1673 1604 1676 1695 1714 10 1313 1414 1441 1498 1581 1653 1716 1646 1664 1683 11 1296 1305 1407 1434 1491 1575 1645 1707 1726 1746 12 1377 1406 1416 1519 1546 1605 1687 1756 1776 1796 GR 9-12 5358 5523 5717 5989 6227 6506 6652 6784 6861 6939 Total 16949 17472 17999 18555 19029 19516 19948 20304 20534 20767 % of change 3.08%3.02%3.09%2.56%2.56%2.21%1.79%1.13%1.14% change +/- 523 527 556 474 486 432 356 230 233 6.D.b Packet Pg. 157 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-April 2019 49 TABLE 6 New Developments - Pupil Projection Cumulative 2.61%1.14% ND3.13A by Grade Level Updated April 2018 Uses a 'cohort survival'GRADE 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2024-25 2025-26 2025-26 model assuming 100% of Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected previous year new KDG 1272 1261 1277 1303 1292 enrollees move to the next 1 1290 1319 1309 1327 1352 1342 grade level.2 1311 1315 1345 1336 1353 1379 1368 3 1276 1329 1334 1365 1356 1374 1398 1385 Kindergarten calculates 4 1378 1307 1360 1366 1397 1389 1405 1427 birth rate average plus 5 1345 1398 1328 1382 1388 1419 1409 1424 7872 7930 7954 8079 8137 6903 5580 4236 Current generation based on 6 1275 1348 1402 1332 1386 1392 1422 1410 % of total enrollment. Other 7 1231 1300 1373 1428 1358 1413 1417 1446 factor uses 100% cohort 8 1213 1248 1317 1392 1446 1377 1430 1433 survival, based on 6 year 3719 3895 4092 4152 4190 4182 4269 4289 history.9 1372 1389 1425 1496 1570 1627 1556 1608 10 1313 1389 1407 1444 1514 1590 1644 1572 11 1296 1301 1377 1396 1433 1504 1578 1631 12 1377 1360 1365 1443 1462 1500 1570 1642 5358 5438 5574 5779 5979 6221 6348 6454 Total 16949 17263 17620 18010 18306 % of change 1.86%2.07%2.21%1.65% change +/- 314 357 389 296 TABLE 7 New Projects - Pupil Projection Cumulative ND 3.6A by Grade Level Updated April 2018 Uses a 'cohort survival'GRADE 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2024-25 2025-26 2025-26 model assuming 100% of Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected previous year new KDG 1272 1261 1277 1303 1292 enrollees move to the next 1 1290 1329 1319 1336 1361 1351 grade level.2 1311 1336 1375 1366 1383 1409 1398 3 1276 1349 1374 1415 1405 1423 1447 1434 Kindergarten calculates 4 1378 1308 1382 1408 1448 1440 1456 1479 birth rate average plus 5 1345 1407 1338 1412 1438 1480 1469 1484 7872 7990 8066 8240 8328 Current generation based on 6 1275 1344 1407 1338 1412 1439 1478 1467 % of total enrollment. Other 7 1231 1312 1381 1445 1377 1451 1476 1514 factor uses 100% cohort 8 1213 1268 1350 1420 1484 1416 1489 1513 survival, based on 6 year 3719 3924 4138 4204 4273 4306 4444 4494 history.9 1372 1398 1454 1537 1608 1673 1604 1676 10 1313 1414 1441 1498 1581 1653 1716 1646 11 1296 1305 1407 1434 1491 1575 1645 1707 12 1377 1406 1416 1519 1546 1605 1687 1756 5358 5523 5717 5989 6227 6506 6652 6784 Total 16949 17437 17921 18433 18828 % of change 2.88%2.78%2.86%2.14% change +/- 488 484 512 394 6.D.b Packet Pg. 158 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey 6.D.b Packet Pg. 159 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Auburn School District Development Growth since 1/1/14 April 2019 (Based on November 1, 2018 Enrollment) 51 SINGLE FAMILY Elem Middle HS Total Elem Middle HS Total Alicia Glenn 2016 28 28 0 Arthur Jacobsen 6 1 6 13 0.214 0.036 0.214 0.464 Anthem (formerly Megan's Meadows)2018 13 13 0 Ilalko 6 1 2 9 0.462 0.077 0.154 0.692 Bridges 386 294 92 Lea Hill 57 22 39 118 0.366 0.268 0.347 0.981 Canyon Creek 2018 151 151 0 Evergreen Hts.24 6 7 37 0.159 0.040 0.046 0.245 Kendall Ridge 2015 104 104 0 Arthur Jacobsen 24 9 13 46 0.231 0.087 0.125 0.442 Lakeland East: Portola 2015 130 130 0 Ilalko 48 22 26 96 0.369 0.169 0.200 0.738 Lakeland: Edgeview 2015 368 368 0 Gildo Rey 73 31 36 140 0.198 0.084 0.098 0.380 Lakeland Hills Estates 2017 66 66 0 Gildo Rey 15 9 10 34 0.227 0.136 0.152 0.515 Lakeland: Pinnacle Estates 2018 99 99 0 Lakeland Hills 51 21 22 94 0.515 0.212 0.222 0.949 Lakeland: Villas at…2015 81 81 0 Ilalko 27 9 5 41 0.333 0.111 0.062 0.506 Monterey Park 2016 235 235 0 Evergreen Hts.42 24 42 108 0.179 0.102 0.179 0.460 Mountain View 2018 55 55 0 Evergreen Hts.13 2 5 20 0.236 0.036 0.091 0.364 Sonata Hills 2017 71 71 0 Lea Hill 8 2 4 14 0.113 0.028 0.056 0.197 Spencer Place 2017 13 13 0 Arthur Jacobsen 9 5 1 15 0.692 0.385 0.077 1.154 Willow Place 12 4 8 Lea Hill 0 0 1 1 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.250 Dulcinea 2018 6 6 0 Lea Hill 2 1 0 3 0.333 0.167 0.000 0.500 Hazel View 2018 22 22 0 Lea Hill 7 2 3 12 0.318 0.091 0.136 0.545 Totals 1840 1740 100 412 167 222 801 0.237 0.096 0.128 0.460 Year of Full OccupancyDevelopment Name Units/ Parcels Current Occupancy To Be Occupied Actual Students Student Generation FactorsFeeder Elementary 6.D.b Packet Pg. 160 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : Auburn School District Development Growth since 1/1/13 April 2019 (Based on November 1, 2018 Enrollment) 52 SINGLE FAMILY--2019 and beyond Middle HS Total Anderson Acres 14 0 14 1 2 6 Backbone Ridge 7 0 7 1 1 3 Bridle Estates 18 0 18 2 2 8 Hastings 10 *10 0 10 1 1 5 Hazel Heights 22 0 22 2 3 10 Lakeland: Forest Glen At ..30 0 30 3 4 14 Lakeland: Park Ridge 256 0 256 25 33 118 Lakeland: River Rock*14 0 14 1 2 6 Pacific Lane 11 0 11 1 1 5 Ridge At Tall Timbers 104 0 104 10 13 48 Omnia Palisades Plate 16 0 16 2 2 7 Auburn Gateway 500 0 500 48 64 230 Richardson BLA/Plat 6 0 6 1 1 3 Huntionton Woods 74 0 74 7 9 34 Hastings 10 0 10 1 1 5 Topaz Short Plat 4 0 4 0 1 2 Oxbow Acres 3 0 3 0 0 1 Vasiliy 7 0 7 1 1 3 Wyncrest II 41 0 41 4 5 19 Wesport Capital 306 0 306 29 39 141 1453 1453 Totals 139 185 669 * currently under construction 3 25 4 344 118 72 18 1 2 1 1 10 2 Development Name To Be Occupied Elem Units/ Parcels Current Occupancy Estimated Students Based on Student Generation Factors 3 2 4 2 5 7 61 3 6.D.b Packet Pg. 161 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : Auburn School District Development Growth since 1/1/14 April 2019 (Based on November 1, 2018 Enrollment) 53 MULTI FAMILY Elem Middle HS Total Elem Middle HS Total Promenade Apts (formerly Auburn Hills)2018 294 294 0 Lea Hill 191 83 84 358 0.650 0.282 0.286 1.218 The Villas at Auburn 2018 295 295 0 Washington 34 7 5 46 0.115 0.024 0.017 0.156 Totals 589 589 0 225 90 89 404 0.382 0.153 0.151 0.686 2019 and beyond Sundallen Condos 48 0 48 18 7 7 33 Total 18 7 7 33 Development Name To Be Occupied Actual Students Feeder Elementary Year of Full Occupancy Estimated Students Based on Student Generation Factors Student Generation FactorsUnits/ Parcels Current Occupancy Units/ Parcels Current Occupancy To Be Occupied 6.D.b Packet Pg. 162 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 401 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2019-2024 Board Introduction: June 26, 2019 Adoption: July 10, 2019 6.D.b Packet Pg. 163 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 401 SUPERINTENDENT Dr. Susan Enfield CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2019-2024 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Bernie Dorsey, President Angelica Alvarez, Vice President Fa’izah Bradford Tyrone Curry, Sr. Joe Van 6.D.b Packet Pg. 164 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Table of Contents Page Introduction ......................................................................................................................................1 Standard of Service ..........................................................................................................................3 Capital Facilities Inventory ..............................................................................................................5 Student Enrollment Trends and Projections ....................................................................................9 Capital Facilities Projections for Future Needs .............................................................................10 Financing Plan ...............................................................................................................................12 School Impact Fees ........................................................................................................................14 Appendix A: District Map .......................................................................................................... A-1 Appendix B: Population and Enrollment Data ............................................................................B-1 Appendix C: Student Generation Rates/Data............................................................................... C-1 For information regarding the Highline School District’s 2019-2024 Capital Facilities Plan, contact Rodney Sheffer, Executive Director, Capital Planning and Construction, Highline School District No. 401, 17810 8th Avenue South, Building A, Burien, Washington 98148. Telephone: (206) 631-7500 6.D.b Packet Pg. 165 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e - 1 - Purpose of the Capital Facilities Plan This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan has been prepared by the Highline School District (the “District”) as the District’s primary facility planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington’s Growth Management Act (the “GMA”) and King County Council Code Title 21A. The Plan was prepared using data available in May 2019. The GMA outlines 13 broad goals including adequate provision of necessary public facilities and services. Schools are among these necessary facilities and services. School districts have adopted capital facilities plans to satisfy the requirements of RCW 36.70A.070 and to identify additional school facilities necessary to meet the educational needs of the growing student populations anticipated in their districts. The Highline School District (the “District”) has prepared this Capital Facilities Plan (the “CFP”) to provide King County (the “County”) and the cities of Burien, Des Moines, Kent, Normandy Park, SeaTac, and Tukwila with a schedule and financing program for capital improvements over the next six years (2019-2024). The District will update this Plan annually and include any necessary changes to the impact fee schedule. Executive Summary The District experienced steady enrollment increases between 2010 and 2017. However, 2018 enrollment decreased from the previous year and January 2019 enrollment projections show a continuing decline through 2026 (with enrollment gradually increasing again in that year to 2018 levels). The District intends to monitor actual enrollment figures closely in order to determine if the January 2019 enrollment projections hold true or need to be adjusted to reflect actual enrollment figures and updated development data. The District currently serves an approximate student population of 18,273 (October 1, 2018 enrollment) with 18 elementary schools (grades K-6), four middle level schools (grades 7-8), and five high schools (grades 9-12). In addition, the District has alternative programs: Big Picture (MS and HS) at the Manhattan site; CHOICE Academy (MS and HS) at the Woodside site; New Start (9-12) at the Salmon Creek Site; and Puget Sound Skills Center (“PSSC”). The District will reconfigure grade levels in the fall of 2019 when elementary schools will serve grades K-5 and middle schools will serve grades 6-8. Over the last 14 years, the District has embarked on a major capital improvement effort to enhance its facilities to meet current educational and life-safety standards. Since 2002, the District has passed three major capital bonds: one in 2002 for approximately $189,000,000, one in 2006 for approximately $148,000,000, and one in 2016 for approximately $299,850,000. The 2002 and 2006 bonds were used for replacement of existing facilities and not to accommodate increased enrollment. The 2016 bonds are earmarked for a combination of improvements to/replacement of existing facilities and the provision of new capacity. With the approved capital bond funds and reimbursements from the Office of the Superintendent SECTION ONE: INTRODUCTION 6.D.b Packet Pg. 166 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e - 2 - of Public Instruction, the State of Washington, the Port of Seattle, the Federal Aviation Administration and private donations for a new Raisbeck Aviation High School, the District has designed, permitted and constructed 13 new elementary schools, 2 new high schools, renovated 3 schools as interim facilities, and renovated portions of Memorial Field and Camp Waskowitz. All of this work has been done since March 2002. The District’s 2016 bond proposal was based on the recommendations of a Capital Facilities Advisory Committee (“CFAC”), a citizens’ committee representing every part the District. The committee met for a year to study the District's facilities needs, review data, such as enrollment projections and building conditions, and analyze various solutions. CFAC developed a long- term facilities plan, which includes the 2016 bond as the first phase of a four-phase plan to meet students’ needs over the next 20 years. The 2016 bond projects include new capacity at the elementary and middle school levels to accommodate enrollment needs and the implementation of recent legislation. Specifically, the District is constructing a new Des Moines Elementary to replace the existing school and increase its student capacity, adding classrooms at existing elementary schools, and building the new Glacier Middle School. The District does not anticipate the need at this time for additional land to accommodate the new schools; however, land will be necessary in the future to support the District’s long-range facilities plan and the Educational Strategic Plan. This CFP identifies the current enrollment, the current capacity of each educational facility as well as programmed improvements, and the projected enrollment over the six-year planning period. This CFP does not recommend a schedule of impact fees for new development. However, as noted above, the District intends to closely monitor enrollment patterns and future updates to this CFP may include an impact fee recommendation where supported by projected enrollment increases and related capacity needs. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 167 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e - 3 - King County Code 21A.06 refers to a “Standard of Service” that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. School facility and student capacity needs are dictated by the types and amounts of space required to accommodate the District’s adopted educational program. The educational program standards which typically drive facility space needs include grade configuration, optimum facility size, class size, educational program offerings, classroom utilization and scheduling requirements, and use of relocatable classrooms (portables). District educational program standards may change in the future as a result of changes in the education program, special programs class sizes, grade span configurations, and use of new technology, as well as other physical aspects of the school facilities. In addition, the State Legislature’s implementation of requirements for reduced K-3 class size will also impact school capacity and educational program standards. (The District currently offers full-day kindergarten.) The school capacity inventory will be reviewed periodically and adjusted for any changes to the educational program standards. These changes will also be reflected in future updates of this CFP. The Standard of Service outlined below reflects only those programs and educational opportunities provided to students that directly affect the capacity of school buildings. The special programs listed below require classroom space, thus the permanent capacity of some buildings housing these programs has been reduced. Table 1 Class Size – Standard of Service Grade Level Average Class Size Based on Standard of Service Kindergarten 24* Grades 1 – 3 25* Grades 4 – 6 27 Grades 7 – 8 30 Grades 9 – 12 32 *The District standard for K-3 will change to 17:1 in fall of 2019 (see Table 7). It is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of all regular teaching stations throughout the day. Therefore, classroom capacity is adjusted using a utilization factor of available teaching stations depending on the physical characteristics of the facility and educational program needs. SECTION 2 – STANDARD OF SERVICE 6.D.b Packet Pg. 168 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e - 4 - Elementary School Standard of Service Models • Special education for students with disabilities may be provided in self- contained classrooms. • All students are provided music instruction in a separate classroom. • Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms designated as follows: • Resource Rooms • English Language Learners (ELL) • Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) • Gifted Education • Learning Assisted Programs • Severely Behavior Disorder • Transition Rooms • Mild, Moderate, and Severe Disabilities • Developmental Kindergarten • Extended Daycare Programs and Preschool Programs Secondary School Standard of Service Models • Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms designated as follows: • Resource Rooms • English Language Learners (ELL) • Science Labs • Career and Vocational Rooms • Daycare Programs • Alternative Program Spaces 6.D.b Packet Pg. 169 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e -5- This section provides an inventory of capital facilities owned and operated by the District including schools and relocatable classrooms (modulars or portables). School facility capacity was inventoried based on the space required to accommodate the District’s adopted educational program standards. See Section Two: Standard of Service. A map showing locations of District facilities is provided in Appendix A. Schools See Section One for a description of the District’s schools and programs. School capacity was determined based on the number of teaching stations (or general classrooms) within each building and the space requirements of the District’s currently adopted current educational program and internal targets as reported to the Information and Condition of Schools (ICOS) system with the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction. It is this capacity calculation that is used to establish the District’s baseline capacity, and to determine future capacity needs based on projected student enrollment. The school capacity inventory is summarized in Tables 2, 3, and 4. As the District implements reduced K-3 class size requirements and grade reconfiguration, the inventory will reflect adjustments in the Standard of Service (see Table 7). Relocatable Classrooms (Portables) Relocatable classrooms (portables) are used as interim classroom space to house students until funding can be secured to construct permanent classrooms. The District currently uses 52 relocatable classrooms at various school sites throughout the District to provide additional interim general classroom capacity. A typical relocatable classroom can provide capacity for a full-size class of students. Current use of relocatable classrooms throughout the District is summarized in Table 5. SECTION THREE: CAPITAL FACILITIES INVENTORY 6.D.b Packet Pg. 170 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e -6- Table 2 Elementary School Level Inventory Elementary School Building Area (sq. ft.) Teaching Stations* Permanent Capacity** Beverly Park at Glendale ES 58,145 22 514 Bow Lake ES 76,108 30 666 Cedarhurst ES 68,916 26 619 Des Moines ES 41,766 19 471 Gregory Heights ES 65,978 27 585 Hazel Valley ES 65,346 26 452 Hilltop ES 51,532 24 594 Madrona ES 69,240 25 598 Marvista ES 68,462 27 621 McMicken Heights ES 69,979 25 582 Midway ES 66,096 25 610 Mount View ES 67,783 26 628 North Hill ES 65,665 27 636 Parkside ES 68,857 26 622 Seahurst ES 59,967 27 585 Shorewood ES 60,326 22 483 Southern Heights ES 32,942 15 336 White Center ES 65,654 26 622 TOTAL 1,122,762 445 10,231 * Teaching Station definition: A space designated as a classroom. Other stations include spaces designated for special education and pull-out programs. ** General classrooms 6.D.b Packet Pg. 171 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e -7- Table 3 Middle School Level Inventory*** Middle School Building Area (sq. ft.) Teaching Stations* Permanent Capacity** Cascade MS 90,582 34 986 Chinook MS 87,476 27 783 Pacific MS 73,941 24 696 Sylvester MS 92,617 30 870 Big Picture MS (at Manhattan)^ 2 58 Choice (at Woodside) ^ 2 58 TOTAL 344,616 119 3,451 * Teaching Station Definition: A space designated as a general classroom. Other stations include spaces designated for special education and pull-out programs. ** General classrooms. ***Does not include alternative programs: CHOICE Academy MS/HS at Woodside site. Table 4 High School Level Inventory*** High School Building Area (sq. ft.) Teaching Stations* Permanent Capacity** Raisbeck Aviation HS 87,934 14 448 Big Picture HS (at Manhattan)^ 29,141 10 320 Evergreen HS 161,456 48 1,536 Highline HS 214,919 59 1,500 Mount Rainier HS 205,159 47 1,504 Tyee HS 143,101 38 1,216 TOTALS 841,710 227 6,524 * Teaching Station definition: A space designated as a general classroom. Other stations include spaces designated for special education and pull-out programs. ** Regular classrooms. ***Does not include alternative programs: CHOICE Academy MS/HS at Woodside site; New Start HS at Salmon Creek site; and Puget Sound Skills Center. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 172 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e -8- Table 5 Relocatable Classrooms (Portable) Inventory Elementary School Relocatables** Other*** Interim Capacity Beverly Park at Glendale 0 2 0 Bow Lake 4 0 100 Cedarhurst 4 0 100 Des Moines 0 1 0 Gregory Heights 0 0 0 Hazel Valley 3 1 75 Hilltop 5 1 125 Madrona 2 0 50 Marvista 2 0 50 McMicken Heights 0 0 0 Midway 4 0 100 Mount View 4 0 100 North Hill 0 0 0 Parkside 0 0 0 Seahurst 2 2 50 Shorewood 1 3 25 Southern Heights 2 1 50 White Center 1 3 25 TOTAL 34 14 850 Middle School Relocatables** Other *** Interim Capacity Cascade 0 3 0 Chinook 5 1 145 Pacific 4 0 116 Sylvester 2 2 58 Big Picture MS 4 7 116 TOTAL 15 13 435 High School Relocatable** Other*** Interim Capacity Raisbeck Aviation HS 0 0 0 Big Picture HS 0 0 0 Evergreen HS 3 0 0 Highline HS 0 0 0 Mount Rainier HS 0 0 0 Tyee HS 0 1 0 TOTALS 3 1 0 **Used for regular classroom capacity. ***The relocatables referenced under “other relocatables” are used for special pull-out programs, storage, community use, etc. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 173 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e -9- Generally, enrollment projections using historical calculations are most accurate for the initial years of the forecast period. Moving further into the future, more assumptions about economic conditions, land use, and demographic trends in the area affect the projection. Monitoring birth rates in the County and population growth for the area are essential yearly activities in the ongoing management of the CFP. In the event that enrollment growth slows, plans for new facilities can be delayed. It is much more difficult, however, to initiate new projects or expedite projects in the event enrollment growth exceeds the projections. With the assistance of a professional demographer, the District has developed its own methodology for forecasting future enrollments. This methodology, a modified cohort survival method, considers a variety of factors to evaluate the potential student population growth for the years 2019 through 2028. These factors include: projected births, projected growth in the K-12 population, and a model that considers growth in population and housing within the District’s boundaries. The methodology also considers the potential impacts on enrollment in response to the opening of a charter school within the District’s boundaries. Certain assumptions are made regarding the continued enrollment at the charter school. Therefore, the methodology and the resulting projections should be considered conservative. District enrollment has increased in recent years, including a 2.02% increase since 2009, but is projected to decline over the six-year planning period before stabilizing and then increasing again thereafter. Using the modified cohort survival projections, the District expects a total enrollment of 18,031 students in 2024 and a total enrollment of 18,418 by 2028. See Appendix B (Enrollment projections from Les Kendrick, January 2019). The District intends to closely monitor actual enrollment figures and, as necessary, make adjustments if any of the underlying assumptions change or actual enrollment varies notably from the projections. Future updates to this CFP will identify any adjustments or changes. Table 6 Projected Student Enrollment 2019-2024 Projection 2018* 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Change Percent Change 18,273 18,034 17,911 17,785 17,744 17,831 18,031 (242) -1.32% *Actual October 2018 enrollment. SECTION FOUR: STUDENT ENROLLMENT TRENDS AND PROJECTIONS 6.D.b Packet Pg. 174 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e -10- Projected future capacity needs, shown in Table 7, are derived by applying the projected number of students to the projected permanent capacity. It is not the District’s policy to include relocatable classrooms when determining future capital facility needs; therefore, interim capacity provided by relocatable classrooms is not included in this analysis. The District will utilize relocatables as necessary to address interim capacity needs. Information on relocatable classrooms by grade level and interim capacity can be found in Table 5. Information on planned construction projects can be found in the Financing Plan, Table 8. Recent state-level policy decisions impact the District’s capacity analysis. Engrossed Senate House Bill 2261, adopted in 2009, requires school districts to implement full-day kindergarten by 2019. SHB 2776, passed in 2010, requires school districts to reduce K-3 class sizes to 17 students per teacher. Finally, in November 2014, the voters passed Initiative 1351, which requires reduced class sizes across all grades (K-12). The District has proactively implemented full day kindergarten, which reduced the number of available regular classrooms in elementary schools districtwide. Table 7 assumes that K-3 class size reduction is implemented in 2019 and that grade levels are reconfigured to K-5, 6-8, and 9-12 in 2019. Table 7 also includes the capacity related projects the District is planning during the six-year planning period. Future updates to this Plan will incorporate any funded implementation of Initiative 1351. SECTION FIVE: CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECTIONS FOR FUTURE NEEDS 6.D.b Packet Pg. 175 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e -11- *Actual October 2017 enrollment **Does not include portable capacity ^Implementation of reduced K-3 class size and adjusted Standard of Service; Movement of 6th grade to middle school level ’’Addition of new classrooms at existing elementary schools and New Des Moines Elementary School opens at the Zenith site with added capacity Middle School Level -- Surplus/Deficiency *Actual October 2018 enrollment **Does not include portable capacity ^Movement of 6th grade to middle school level ’New Glacier Middle School opens High School Level -- Surplus/Deficiency Table 7 Projected Student Capacity – 2019 through 2024 Elementary School Level -- Surplus/Deficiency 2018* 2019^ 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Existing Permanent Capacity 10,231 9,034 9,576 9,576 9,576 9,576 9,576 Added Permanent Capacity 0 542” 0 0 0 Total Permanent Capacity** 10,231 9,576 9,576 9,576 9,576 9,576 9,576 Enrollment 10,264 8,621 8,513 8,500 8,538 8,670 8,817 Surplus (Deficiency)** Permanent Capacity (33) 955 1,063 1,076 1,038 90 759 2018* 2019^ 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Existing Permanent Capacity 3,451 3,451 4,401 4,401 4,401 4,401 4,401 Added Permanent Capacity 0 951’ 0 0 0 0 Total Permanent Capacity** 3,451 4,401 4,401 4,401 4,401 4,401 4,401 Enrollment 2,517 4,017 4,104 4,031 3,849 3,724 3,703 Surplus (Deficiency)** Permanent Capacity 934 384 297 370 552 677 698 2018* 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Existing Permanent Capacity 6,524 6,524 6,524 6,524” 6,524 6,524 6,524 Added Permanent Capacity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Permanent Capacity** 6,524 6,524 6,524 6,524 6,524 6,524 6,524 Enrollment 5,492 5,395 5,293 5,253 5,358 5,437 5,512 Surplus (Deficiency)** Permanent Capacity 1,032 1,129 1,231 1,271 1,166 1,087 1,012 *Actual October 2018 enrollment **Does not include portable capacity. ”Highline High School re-opens with at current site with same net capacity. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 176 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e -12- Planned Improvements The Finance Plan focuses on capacity related projects needed to accommodate recent and projected growth in the District. Pursuant to the Board’s approval of the Capital Facilities Advisory Committee’s final recommendations and the voters’ approval of the 2016 bond, the District will: (1) add space to the new Des Moines Elementary School (replacement school at the Zenith site), (2) construct new elementary school classrooms at various sites, and (3) construct a new midd1le school. All new schools will be located on land currently owned by the District. These projects accommodate recent growth within the District. The District has identified “non-capacity” capital needs at existing schools including the replacement of Highline High School and safety/security improvements at various schools. The District is also planning for the replacement of both Evergreen and Tyee High Schools, as well as replacement of Pacific Middle School, as a part of a future planned bond proposal. Financing for Planned Improvements Funding for planned improvements is typically secured from a number of sources including voter- approved bonds, State match funds, and impact fees. General Obligation Bonds: Bonds are typically used to fund construction of new schools and other capital improvement projects, and require a 60% voter approval. The District’s voters in November 2016 approved by 66.99% a $299.85 million school construction bond to fund the projects identified in this Plan. State School Construction Assistance Program Funds: State School Construction Assistance funds come from the Common School Construction Fund. The State deposits revenue from the sale of renewable resources from State school lands set aside by the Enabling Act of 1889 into the Common School Account. If these sources are insufficient to meet needs, the Legislature can appropriate General Obligation Bond funds or the Superintendent of Public Instruction can prioritize projects for funding. School districts may qualify for State School Construction Assistance funds for specific capital projects based on a prioritization system. The District received funding in the amount of $6.27 million from Senate Bill 6080 to address a portion of the classrooms needed for implementation of reduced K-3 class sizes. SECTION SIX: FINANCING PLAN 6.D.b Packet Pg. 177 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e -13- Impact Fees: Impact fees are a means of supplementing traditional funding sources for construction of public facilities needed to accommodate new development. See Section 7 School Impact Fees. The District also receives some funding toward school construction from the Port of Seattle/Federal Aviation Administration. This funding applies to the new Des Moines Elementary project and the Highline High School replacement project. The Six-Year Financing Plan shown on Table 8 demonstrates how the District intends to fund new construction capacity and improvements to school facilities for the years 2019-2024. The financing components include current and future planned bond funding, SCAP funds, Port/FAA funds, and impact fees. Table 8 Capital Facilities Financing Plan (Costs in Millions) Project 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total Cost Bonds/ Local Funds State Funds Impact Fees^ Port/FAA *** Elementary Schools New Des Moines Elementary School 30.000 27.782 $57.782 X X X X Elementary School Classrooms – various sites 3.00 5.00 1.70 $9.700 X SB 6080 Funds X Middle Schools Glacier Middle School (950 capacity) 45.70 45.70 $91.401 X X Pacific Middle School (design) .500 1.00 $1.50 X X Portables High Schools Highline High School 6.400 29.000 29.000 84.009 $148.409 X X X Evergreen High School 1.00 1.50 10.00 15.00 32.863 98.586 $158.949 X X Tyee High School 1.00 1.50 10.00 15.00 32.863 98.586 $158.949 X X Land Purchase (elementary site for future growth) $20.00 X X ***Construction costs used in impact fee formula are adjusted to recognize Port/FAA funding. ^Previously collected. 6.D.b Packet Pg. 178 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e -14- The GMA authorizes jurisdictions to collect impact fees to supplement funding of additional public facilities needed to accommodate new development. Impact fees cannot be used for the operation, maintenance, repair, alteration, or replacement of existing capital facilities used to meet existing service demands. To be eligible to collect school impact fees for new capacity projects, a district must demonstrate expected grade level enrollment growth over the six-year planning period and a related need for new capacity. As discussed in Section 4 above, after several years of increasing enrollment the District’s current enrollment projections show a decline in elementary and middle school enrollment over the six-year planning period. The District plans to monitor actual enrollment in future years and will include updated information in future updates to this CFP. When the District is eligible for impact fees to fund growth-related capacity needs, impact fees are calculated utilizing the formula in the King County Code. The resulting figures are based on the District’s cost per dwelling unit to purchase land for school sites, make site improvements, construct schools, and purchase/install relocatable classrooms (portables). As required under the GMA, credits are applied in the formula to account for State Match Funds to be reimbursed to the District and projected future property taxes to be paid by the dwelling unit. The District’s cost per dwelling unit is derived by multiplying the cost per student by the applicable student generation rate per dwelling unit. The student generation rate is the average number of students generated by each housing type; in this case, single family dwellings and multi-family dwellings. The District has developed its own student generation rate data based on actual permit data from local jurisdictions. See Appendix C. The District applies a 50% discount rate required by the King County School Impact Fee Ordinance to the fee calculated using the variables and formula described above. King County and the City of Kent currently have adopted school impact fee ordinances and collect school impact fees on behalf of the District when requested. The District has asked the other cities that it serves to consider adoption of a school impact fee ordinance. These requests are necessary as the District anticipates once again establishing eligibility to request school impact fees in the future. Table 9 School Impact Fees 2019 Housing Type Impact Fee Per Dwelling Unit Single Family N/A Multi-Family N/A SECTION SEVEN: SCHOOL IMPACT FEES 6.D.b Packet Pg. 179 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e A-1 APPENDIX A DISTRICT MAP 6.D.b Packet Pg. 180 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e A-2 6.D.b Packet Pg. 181 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e A-3 6.D.b Packet Pg. 182 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e B-1 APPENDIX B POPULATION AND ENROLLMENT DATA 6.D.b Packet Pg. 183 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e B-2 6.D.b Packet Pg. 184 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : C-1 APPENDIX C STUDENT GENERATION RATE DATA 6.D.b Packet Pg. 185 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e C-2 Highline School District Student Generation Rates Highline School District 2019 Capital Facilities Plan – Student Generation Rates The District developed student generation rates based upon new residential development occurring within the District’s boundaries within the preceding five-year period. The District compared student enrollment addresses to the addresses on permits for new dwelling units. Single Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years = 628 Elementary School Students occupying Single Family Residences = 91 Elementary Students Single Family Student Generation Rate = .145 Single Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years = 628 Middle School Students occupying Single Family Residences = 44 Middle School Students Single Family Student Generation Rate = .070 Single Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years = 628 High School Students occupying Single Family Residences = 65 High School Students Single Family Student Generation Rate = .104 Multi-Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years = 580 Elementary School Students occupying Multi-Family Residences = 67 Elementary Students Multi-Family Student Generation Rate = .116 Multi-Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years = 580 Middle School Students occupying Multi-Family Residences = 28 Middle School Students Multi-Family Student Generation Rate = .048 Multi-Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years = 580 High School Students occupying Multi-Family Residences = 22 High School Students Multi-Family Student Generation Rate = .038 6.D.b Packet Pg. 186 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g C o m p P l a n A m e n d - S c h o o l D i s t r i c t C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s P l a n s ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e Impact Fees History 2000 – Present Single-Family Multifamily Kent* Federal Way Auburn Highline Kent Federal Way Auburn Highline 2020 $5,554 $5,035 $6,905 N/A** 2020 $2,345 $20,768*** $14,667*** N/A** 2019 $5,397 $7,221 $5,716 $2,573 2019 $2,279 $19,454*** $4,488 $3,646 2018 $5,235 $6,842 $3,322 $2,290 2018 $2,267 $20,086*** $2,081 $3,162 2017 $5,100 $3,198 $5,469 $7,528 2017 $2,210 $8,386 $1,640 $6,691 2016 $4,990 $2,899 $5,331 $8,229 2016 $2,163 $506 $2,625 $7,453 2015 $5,486 $5,171 $4,137 $6,328 2015 $3,378 $1,834 $3,518 $3,761 2014 $5,486 $5,363 $5,399 $7,412 2014 $3,378 $1,924 $3,388 $3,251 2013 $5,486 $4,014 $5,512 $7,912 2013 $3,378 $1,381 $3,380 $3,101 2012 $5,486 $4,014 $5,557 N/A 2012 $3,378 $1,253 $2,305 N/A 2011 $5,486 $4,014 $5,266 N/A 2011 $3,378 $2,172 $1,518 N/A 2010 $5,394 $3,832 $5,433 N/A 2010 $3,322 $2,114 $1,185 N/A 2009 $5,304 $4,017 $5,375 N/A 2009 $3,266 $1,733 $877 N/A 2008 $5,110 $3,883 $5,361 N/A 2008 $3,146 $1,647 $466 N/A 2007 $4,928 $3,018 $5,657 N/A 2007 $3,034 $856 $1,228 N/A 2006 $4,775 $3,393 $5,681 N/A 2006 $2,940 $895 $1,536 N/A 2005 $4,056 $2,868 $5,297 N/A 2005 $1,762 $905 $1,832 N/A 2004 $4,292 $3,269 $4,528 N/A 2004 $2,643 $940 $1,212 N/A 2003 $4,147 $3,865 N/A N/A 2003 $2,554 $1,086 N/A N/A 2002 $3,782 $2,616 N/A N/A 2002 $2,329 $896 N/A N/A 2001 $3,782 $2,710 N/A N/A 2001 $2,329 $830 N/A N/A 2000 $3,782 $2,384 N/A N/A 2000 $2,329 $786 N/A N/A *Kent School District has for several years been utilizing an inflation-adjusted rate instead of a formula-driven rate. This year, for instance, the actual rate would have been $11,119 for single-family and $2,760 for multifamily. KSD staff anticipate revisiting the inflation-based impact fee approach next year. **Highline School District proposed no impact fees this year due to declining enrollment and excess capacity. ***These fees exceed the maximum allowable fee which is set at $9,193 for 2020 for multifamily. This number is updated annually to match the change in construction cost index in the Seattle area. 6.D.c Packet Pg. 187 At t a c h m e n t : I m p a c t F e e s H i s t o r y 2 0 0 0 ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n / C a p i t a l 1 School Impact Fees – 2019-2020 ORDINANCE NO. ________ AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending Section 12.13.160 of the Kent City Code to adjust the school impact fee schedules (CPA-2019-1). RECITALS A. The City of Kent has adopted a school impact fee program as authorized by the State Growth Management Act (GMA) and RCW 82.02.050. B. Chapter 12.13 of the Kent City Code (KCC) requires that the Capital Facilities Plans of school districts be submitted to the City of Kent on an annual basis for City Council review, and that this review must occur in conjunction with any update of the Capital Facilities Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City Council has reviewed the Capital Facilities Plans submitted by the school districts. C. The Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts have requested amendments to the text of Kent City Code to reflect proposed changes to impact fees. Highline School District has requested no impact fee for this year. D. On September 20, 2019, the City provided the required 60 day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 to the State of Washington of the 6.D.d Packet Pg. 188 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e S c h o o l I m p a c t F e e s 2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 0 F i n a l ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n / C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s E l e m e n t 2 School Impact Fees – 2019-2020 City’s proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan and Chapter 12.13 of the KCC. The 60 day notice period has passed and by operation of law is deemed approved. E. After a public hearing before the City Council on October 15, 2019, the City Council on November 19, 2019, approved Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-2019-1 to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School Districts, and changes to the Kent City Code to reflect impact fees as follows: (1) for the Kent School District, increasing the school impact fee for single-family units to $5,544, and for multifamily units to $2,345; (2) for the Federal Way School District, decreasing the school impact fee for single-family units to $5,035, and for multifamily units to $9,193; (3) for the Auburn School District, increasing the school impact fee for single-family units to $6,905, and increasing the school impact fee for multifamily units to $9,193; and (4) for the Highline School District, removing impact fees for single-family and multifamily units. F. In order to implement the new impact fee schedules referenced above, it is necessary to amend section 12.13.160 KCC. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE SECTION 1. – Amendment. Section 12.13.160 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 12.13.160. Base fee schedule. The following fee shall be assessed for the indicated types of development: 6.D.d Packet Pg. 189 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e S c h o o l I m p a c t F e e s 2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 0 F i n a l ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n / C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s E l e m e n t 3 School Impact Fees – 2019-2020 School District Single-Family Multifamily Multifamily Studio Kent, No. 415 $5,397 5,554 $2,279 2,345 $0.00 Federal Way, No. 210 $7,221 5035 $8,755 9,193 0.00 Auburn, No. 408 $5,716 6,905 $4,488 9,193 0.00 Highline, No. 401 $2,573 0 $3,646 0 0.00 SECTION 2. – Amendment. Section 12.13.170 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 12.13.170. Maximum allowable fees. School impact fees provided by this chapter shall be assessed based on the calculation set forth in KCC 12.13.140, unless they exceed a maximum allowable fee as set forth in this section. There shall be an increase in the maximum allowable fee each year by the same percentage as the percentage change in the previous calendar year’s average monthly Engineering News Record (ENR) Seattle Area Construction Cost Index values, relative to the corresponding average monthly ENR Construction Cost Index values for the preceding year, as calculated from August 1st through July 30th. The maximum allowable fee is set at $9,021 8,591 for single-family dwelling units and a maximum of $9,193 8,755 for multifamily dwelling units for 202019. SECTION 3. - Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon 6.D.d Packet Pg. 190 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e S c h o o l I m p a c t F e e s 2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 0 F i n a l ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n / C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s E l e m e n t 4 School Impact Fees – 2019-2020 approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering; or references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations. SECTION 4. – Severability. If any one or more section, subsection, or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, that decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. – Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law. DANA RALPH, MAYOR Date Approved ATTEST: KIMBERLEY A. KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted Date Published APPROVED AS TO FORM: PAT FITZPATRICK, CITY ATTORNEY 6.D.d Packet Pg. 191 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e S c h o o l I m p a c t F e e s 2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 0 F i n a l ( 2 0 1 2 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g o n t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n / C a p i t a l F a c i l i t i e s E l e m e n t DATE: October 15, 2019 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Public Hearing to Consider Declaring Certain Public Utility Equipment and Materials Surplus – Resolution - Adopt MOTION: Adopt Resolution No. 1996, declaring certain public utility equipment and materials as surplus and authorize the Public Works Director to dispose of the equipment in the manner that best meets the public interest. SUMMARY: Through daily operations, the water department maintenance crews accumulate used copper and brass fittings, pipe, wiring and water meters. These components have been replaced and are no longer useful. There are approximately 400 used water meters and miscellaneous valves that need to be sold as scrap metal. These items can be sold by the pound to local salvage dealers. We estimate the surplus property equates to approximately 1,000 pounds of copper and brass which an estimated fair market value of $1,500 when recycled. RCW 35.94.040 requires that the City Council hold a public hearing and adopt a resolution to declare public utility equipment as surplus and to establish the condition for disposition of the equipment that is in the best public interest. SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Evolving Infrastructure, Sustainable Services ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution for the Surplus and Disposal of Materials (Public Utility Funds - Water Dept) (PDF) 2. Exhibit (PDF) 09/16/19 Public Works Committee RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL [UNANIMOUS] Next: 10/15/2019 7:00 PM MOVER: Toni Troutner, Councilmember SECONDER: Brenda Fincher, Councilmember AYES: Dennis Higgins, Brenda Fincher, Toni Troutner 6.E Packet Pg. 192 1 Surplus Property Water System Utility Equipment RESOLUTION NO. 1996 A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, determining that certain water system utility equipment is surplus to the City’s needs, providing for the sale thereof, stating the consideration to be paid for the equipment, and authorizing the Director of Public Works to enter into a sales agreement. RECITALS A. The City of Kent (“City”) has in its possession certain equipment consisting of approximately 400 used water meters and miscellaneous valves, equating to approximately 1,000 pounds of copper and brass, which is no longer actively in use as part of the City’s water system. B. The Director of Public Works has determined that the City no longer has any use or need for such equipment. C. The City Council held a public hearing on Tuesday, October 15, 2019 at a regularly scheduled city council meeting and invited comments regarding the City’s intention to surplus the above-mentioned equipment. 6.E.a Packet Pg. 193 At t a c h m e n t : R e s o l u t i o n f o r t h e S u r p l u s a n d D i s p o s a l o f M a t e r i a l s ( P u b l i c U t i l i t y F u n d s - W a t e r D e p t ) ( 1 9 6 5 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g t o C o n s i d e r 2 Surplus Property Water System Utility Equipment D. RCW 35.94.040 requires that the City determine, after a public hearing and by resolution of the city council, that equipment originally acquired for public utility purposes is surplus to the City’s needs and should be leased, sold or conveyed. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: RESOLUTION SECTION 1. – Recitals Incorporated. The foregoing recitals are incorporated and fully made a part of this resolution. SECTION 2. – Equipment Deemed Surplus. The above-described utility equipment originally acquired for public utility purposes is now surplus to the City’s needs and is not required for providing continued public utility service. SECTION 3. - Public’s Best Interest. It is in the public’s best interest that this surplus equipment be sold for scrap. SECTION 4. – Consideration to be Paid. The consideration to be paid for the surplus property shall be in U.S. dollars in the form of cash or cashier’s check. SECTION 5. – Authority of Public Works Director. The Public Works Director is authorized to enter into an agreement to effect the sale of the surplus property. SECTION 6. – Severability. If any one or more section, subsection, or sentence of this resolution is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such 6.E.a Packet Pg. 194 At t a c h m e n t : R e s o l u t i o n f o r t h e S u r p l u s a n d D i s p o s a l o f M a t e r i a l s ( P u b l i c U t i l i t y F u n d s - W a t e r D e p t ) ( 1 9 6 5 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g t o C o n s i d e r 3 Surplus Property Water System Utility Equipment decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this resolution and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 7. – Corrections by City Clerk. Upon approval of the city attorney, the city clerk is authorized to make necessary corrections to this resolution, including the correction of clerical errors; resolution, section, or subsection numbering; or references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations. SECTION 8. – Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect and be in force immediately upon its passage. October 15, 2019 DANA RALPH, MAYOR Date Approved ATTEST: October 15, 2019 KIMBERLEY A. KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted APPROVED AS TO FORM: ARTHUR “PAT” FITZPATRICK, CITY ATTORNEY 6.E.a Packet Pg. 195 At t a c h m e n t : R e s o l u t i o n f o r t h e S u r p l u s a n d D i s p o s a l o f M a t e r i a l s ( P u b l i c U t i l i t y F u n d s - W a t e r D e p t ) ( 1 9 6 5 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g t o C o n s i d e r urrLrrY MATERTAL - SURPLUS (2019) #4 Bins - Used brass & copper I 6.E.b Packet Pg. 196 At t a c h m e n t : E x h i b i t ( 1 9 6 5 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g t o C o n s i d e r D e c l a r i n g C e r t a i n P u b l i c U t i l i t y E q u i p m e n t a n d curent price for used coppel and brass and seattle wa 9{5t2019 zuner( price fur used @pper and brass and seattle wa - Google Search q Q ntt g stropPng 6l uaps About 645,000 results (0./f seconds) News Sl lmages i More settiilgs Tocils Serap Metal Prices Per Pound Metal Pdce.PerPound Aluminum $1.75 \/ Brass $t.oo \ / @ppet S3.13 lron $1.43 5 mor€ rcvvs ' Jan 34 2019 Washington Scrap Metal Prices - USA https://www-priceofscrapmetalq.com r washington O AboutFeaturedsnippets People also ask How much is brass per pound? What is the scrap price for brass? How much are aluminum cansworth in Washington state? What is scrap steel pricestodaf I Hback tu&d cgtugEtA !.I$Neslle Rating- Hqirl5' Sign in Seattle lron & Metals Corporation 3.3 (12) 'Reeyeling center 601 S Myrtle St (206) 682-0040 Open .Closes 3:30PM O Th6ir website mentioils cu?ent pricing West Seattle Recycling 4-S (21) .Recycling cdnter 3881 16th Ave SW.(206) 935-4?55 Open .Closes 5:30PM @ Their website mentions brass, copper, and current Brices o WEBSITE DIRECTIOITS o WEBSITE DIRECTIONS WEBSITE DIRECIIONS oPacific lron & Metal 4.5 (32) Recycling center 2230 4th Ave S. (206) 628-62,32 https://wwwgoogle.comlsearch?Q=cur..t+triqe+for+used+copper+and+brass+afld+seat$ewa&rlz=1 Ci GCEU_enUS821 US821&oq=cunent+price+f . , . 1/3 6.E.b Packet Pg. 197 At t a c h m e n t : E x h i b i t ( 1 9 6 5 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g t o C o n s i d e r D e c l a r i n g C e r t a i n P u b l i c U t i l i t y E q u i p m e n t a n d M a t e r i a l s S u r p l u s - R e s o l u ) West Seaff/e Recycling 206.935.4255 MowSat 9t5:30p (t) ttle,+WA+981061@47.568578,-122.355595,161data=!4m5!3m4!1s0x549040497b3t7021:0x8ff334fl b2d98d02!8m2!3d47.5686396!4d- MENU Prices Paid for Your Recycling Materials Aluminum Cans & Scrap, Brass, Copper, Steel, lron, Hi-Grade Paper and Newspapers 0- ALUMINIUM CANS Quantity under 25 lbs. over 25 lbs. over 100 lbs. over 200 lbs. Price / lb. 170 200 236 230 Requirements: All cans must be clean of scrap garbage, plastic, glass, cigarettes, paper and tin cans. Please empty all liquid. We will deduct for moisture. We no longer can accept pet food cans and alum. foil and pie plates/trays mixed in with the cans. These must be separated - and we will accept for no pay. ALUMINUM SCRAP Quantity under 25 lbs. over 25 lbs. over 100 lbs. lrony/dirty scrap aluminum Extrusion, solids / clips, rims / wheels lrony extrusion Price / lb. 20( 230 260 5-6d 30-450, 22-280, 6.E.b Packet Pg. 198 At t a c h m e n t : E x h i b i t ( 1 9 6 5 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g t o C o n s i d e r D e c l a r i n g C e r t a i n P u b l i c U t i l i t y E q u i p m e n t a n d M a t e r i a l s S u r p l u s - R e s o l u ) Requirements: Scrap aluminum includes siding, door and window frames, auto and machine parts, lawn furniture, pots and pans. Remove all contaminants such as nails, screws, rivets, bolts, wood, plastic, caulk and rubber to get full price. We no longer accept transmissions or heavy irony aluminum engines effective Nov. 1, 2006 NEWSPAPERS Quantity under 500 lbs over 500 lbs. over 2000 lbs. Price / lb. 26 21t20, 2 3t4 6, Requirements: Please do NOT include junk mail, magazines, boxes, phone books, etc. You may bring in your paper bagged, or bundled, however we will cut strings and remove plastic or paper bags at the scale. HI GRADE PAPER Quantity white ledger / computer color/coated over 500 lbs. Price / lb. 6-76 3O 4O Requirements: Please remove junk mail, ream wrappers, self-adhesive stickers, cardboard,plastic, glued bindings, etc. "L {rf NON.FERROUS METALS Quantity copper #2 Price / lb. $1.90-2.10 $1.75-1.85 insulated copper wire: higrade med grade low grade brass (red, yellow) radiators (clean) radiators (w/steel) stainless steel (clean) lead, zinc irony non-ferrous car batteries $1.25-1.30 $.65-.e5 $.25-.35 $1.20-1.45 $.70-1 .15 $.50-.70 17-250, 20-350 10-50d $5.00 each 6.E.b Packet Pg. 199 At t a c h m e n t : E x h i b i t ( 1 9 6 5 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g t o C o n s i d e r D e c l a r i n g C e r t a i n P u b l i c U t i l i t y E q u i p m e n t a n d M a t e r i a l s S u r p l u s - R e s o l u ) 9t5t2019 Metal Recycling Prices From LFB Trading LLC of Kent, WA PHOTO GALLERY MAPHOME ABOUT US PRODUCTS & SERVICES CONTACT US Metal Recycling Prices Metal Resale Seruices Why Choose Us? . Pricing - We get the best current price for copper, aluminum, steel, etc.. Lowest cost for handling means better value for you,. Low overhead. Honest and reliable service. Honest weights We research the market to find the best available pricing to sell your materials, so you get the highest possible value for your metal. How do we determine what your metal is wofth? Pricing is based upon two methods: . Spot. Formula Based Current Metals Pricing Chafts: Ifbtrading.com/metal-pricing.asp 1t3 6.E.b Packet Pg. 200 At t a c h m e n t : E x h i b i t ( 1 9 6 5 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g t o C o n s i d e r D e c l a r i n g C e r t a i n P u b l i c U t i l i t y E q u i p m e n t a n d M a t e r i a l s S u r p l u s - R e s o l u ) Copper 9t5t2019 Metal Recycling Prices From LFB Trading LLC of Kent, WA 1,44 - {*o 1.36 -u c Scrap Monster, rnnr 2,88 - 2.8 {* qr ?.7? -(J o- ?,64 - 2,56 {' May .. 1-. lul 167 1,e8r- ..'' May 6 .''..t-.. Scrap Monster, ronr .,- .'-.t."........"....1".,". May 30 lun 24 320 - lul 18 Srrap Monster, com ...-.'t.,'''...... "t. ... -... ..1 . May 30 lun 21 lul 17 May 29 lun 20 FE s ?40{t{J'= o_ y7 Contact Us for a price quotation HOME ABOUT US PRODUCTS & SERVICES CONTACT US PHOTO GALLERY MAP Brass Rad iator HMS 80/20 u5$2.5155/lbv -0. 1{ ,Fi{| Perr 16:!* "13:3+ 0+::4 10!1* 16 Zrll9 15:23 llY time r , , tt-llH 05 us$o.7958/Ih ^ ++.,)011 tsltu ?80 HHlr.ki!-c_o_*@J!_ .. 15:*6 e1:+6 0.1!+6 0B:+6 15.f5. 1019 15:45 I'lT time .?ss - r u n um .,. us$o.9337/Ih v -o .0011 e15 . -.,-.- -F.$Jl,'ki!c--q.m,*n- - -1{'!!t !3:2(l 0*:?[ 1{t:!0 16: 3019 16:19 HY time Bt5-- r 2dhr l,llckel !!_$l : sgqQ/ lh Y,. ! . t!!-E .15(' . [50 .95f .85 * 16:l+ll: ?+ l+ i 2+ 1[:'J{ 16: HY tinrefiE3S19 1E .!5 0 lfbtrading.com/metal-pricing.asp 2t3 6.E.b Packet Pg. 201 At t a c h m e n t : E x h i b i t ( 1 9 6 5 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g t o C o n s i d e r D e c l a r i n g C e r t a i n P u b l i c U t i l i t y E q u i p m e n t a n d M a t e r i a l s S u r p l u s - R e s o l u ) 9t512019 Metal Recycling Prices From LFB Trading LLC of Kent, WA LFB Trading LLC 26L33 TBth Ave S, Kent, WA 98032 Bud Barilani, 253-549-9586 Home Contact Us Copyright 2017 Website Design by Dragonwyck@ Web Design L.L.C. prago.trgcle W.b Pt6dF lf you have questions or comments about this website, please contact the Webmaster E lfbtrading.com/metal-pricing.asp 3t3 6.E.b Packet Pg. 202 At t a c h m e n t : E x h i b i t ( 1 9 6 5 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g t o C o n s i d e r D e c l a r i n g C e r t a i n P u b l i c U t i l i t y E q u i p m e n t a n d M a t e r i a l s S u r p l u s - R e s o l u ) Ron From: Sent: To: Subject: Kimberly < kimberly@ binfordmetals.com > Thursday, September 05, 2019 1:43 PM Green, Ron RE: Copper and brass rates From: G reen, Ron <RGreen@kentwa.gov> Sent: Thursday, September 5, 201-9 I:22 PM To:' recycling@ bi nford m eta ls.com' < recycling@ bi nfo rd meta ls.com > Subject: Copper and brass rates Hi can you tell me what your purchase rates are for brass and copper ( City of Kent - used water meters) Thanks, Ron Green S1.00LB water meters How much weight do you have? lf you have clean Brass, and clean copper- lwill need to knowwhat it is before lquote Thank you Kimberly Binford Metals 253-205-6466 EXTERNAL EMAIL 1 6.E.b Packet Pg. 203 At t a c h m e n t : E x h i b i t ( 1 9 6 5 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g t o C o n s i d e r D e c l a r i n g C e r t a i n P u b l i c U t i l i t y E q u i p m e n t a n d M a t e r i a l s S u r p l u s - R e s o l u ) KENT PU BLIC WORKS OPERATIONS David Brock, P.E., Deputy Director Operations Manager Phone: 253-856-5600 Fax: 253-856-6600 Address: 220 Fourth Ave S Kent, WA. 98032-5895 Memorandum WA S H I N G T o N Date: To: Through: From: Subject: Kent City Council Tim LaPorte, Director, Public Works Dave Brock, Deputy Director, Public Works John Johnson, Warehouse Supervisor Request Authorization for Recycling Public Works Operations warehouse has the following equipment/parts that can no longer be used: Approximately 400 water meters which are not functioning properly and are unable to be rebuilt. Malfunctioning meters can have a detrimental impact on water revenues if they do not register accurately. These meters have also been superseded by newer models. a \4 Approximately 1000 pounds of unusable brass fittings and copper pipe removed during the r Space at Public Works Operations shops is extremely limited making the need to remove unusable materials imperative. Therefore, we are requesting to recycle this material. The items described above can be sold for scrap by the pound; the approximate value is $1,500. Although not required, I would request per pound bids from at least three potential buyers, Concur: Dave Brock, Deputy Director, Operations Manager, Public Works Concur Tim LaPorte, Director, Public Works 6.E.b Packet Pg. 204 At t a c h m e n t : E x h i b i t ( 1 9 6 5 : P u b l i c H e a r i n g t o C o n s i d e r D e c l a r i n g C e r t a i n P u b l i c U t i l i t y E q u i p m e n t a n d M a t e r i a l s S u r p l u s - R e s o l u ) DATE: October 15, 2019 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Payment of Bills - Approve MOTION: Approve the payment of bills received through 9/15/19 and paid on 9/15/19, and the payment of bills received through 9/30/19 and paid on 9/30/19, and approve the checks issued for payroll for 9/1/19- 9/15/19 and paid on 9/20/19, and checks issued for payroll 9/16/19 - 9/30/19 and paid on 10/4/19, after auditing by the Committee of the Whole on 10/8/19. 8.A Packet Pg. 205 Approval of payment of the bills received through-----09/15/19 and paid 09/15/19 Approval of checks issued for Vouchers: Date Amount 09/15/19 Wire Transfers 8033 8045 $2,300,510.79 09/15/19 Regular Checks 738476 738806 $3,297,200.86 09/15/19 Payment Plus 101540 101557 $76,387.42 Void Checks ($278.00) 09/15/19 Use Tax Payable $14,025.39 $5,687,846.46 Approval of payment of the bills received through-----09/30/19 and paid 09/30/19 . Approval of checks issued for Vouchers: Date Amount 09/30/19 Wire Transfers 8046 8062 $2,013,988.07 09/30/19 Regular Checks 738807 739228 $5,603,795.25 09/30/19 Payment +101558 101576 $46,974.93 Void Checks ($400.00) 09/30/19 Use Tax Payable $1,908.72 $7,666,266.97 Approval of checks issued for Payroll:9/1/19-9/15/19 and paid 9/20/2019 Date Amount 9/20/2019 Checks 0 Voids and Reissues 9/20/2019 Advices 536657 437532 $1,829,711.32 $1,829,711.32 Approval of checks issued for Payroll:9/16/19-9/30/19 and paid 10/4/2019 Date Amount 10/4/2019 Checks $0.00 Voids and Reissues 10/4/2019 Advices 437533 438393 $1,809,726.58 $1,809,726.58 Document Numbers Document Numbers Document Numbers Document Numbers SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Thriving City, Sustainable Services 8.A Packet Pg. 206 Pending Approval Kent City Council City Council Special Meeting Minutes October 1, 2019 Date: October 1, 2019 Time: 5:00 p.m. Place: Crystal Mountain Hall at Kent Commons SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 5 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER / FLAG SALUTE Mayor Ralph called the meeting to order at 5:03 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Attendee Name Title Status Arrived Toni Troutner Councilmember Present Marli Larimer Councilmember Present Bill Boyce Council President Present Dana Ralph Mayor Present Satwinder Kaur Councilmember Present Dennis Higgins Councilmember Present Les Thomas Councilmember Present Brenda Fincher Councilmember Present 3. OTHER BUSINESS A. Mayor Ralph’s 2020 Mid-Biennium Budget Adjustment Message Mayor Ralph presented her mid-biennium budget adjustment message as follows: I am pleased to present to the City Council the proposed 2020 mid-biennium budget adjustment. The City Council adopted the original 2019-2020 biennial budget in November 2019. That budget process was complicated and presented some significant challenges and required difficult decisions to create a balanced budget. The City was faced with the loss of the state- shared Streamlined Sales Tax mitigation revenues coupled with the expiration of the Panther Lake Annexation Sales Tax Credit equating to nearly 10% of the City’s General Fund revenues. Although the City was able to later take steps to secure the Streamlined Sales Tax Mitigation revenue for another two years, it would not be fiscally prudent to use that revenue stream to support ongoing operating expenses but instead to use it for one- time capital opportunities. Although the 2019-2020 budget faced much hardship, with the collaborative effort amongst City leadership, City Council, City staff and the Kent community, a balanced budget was achieved. Last year budget conversations started in February and those conversations made 8.B.1 Packet Pg. 207 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f O c t 1 , 2 0 1 9 5 : 0 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s ) Kent City Council City Council Special Meeting Minutes October 1, 2019 Kent, Washington Page 2 of 4 the budget process successful. The mid-biennium budget adjustment provides an opportunity to modify the budget to account for changes in fiscal events. The City’s focus was on changes in revenue projections and unforeseeable changes in expenditures which may have arisen since the adoption of the original budget. The mid- biennium budget adjustment also allows us to make recommendations for capital investment opportunities that were not present when the original budget was developed. We did not budget for receipt of any streamlined sales tax mitigation as if had been eliminated from the state’s budget. We had taken capital to sustain operations, so it is appropriate to invest the streamlined sales tax mitigation back in capital projects. The City took a new approach in determining which proposals to recommend as part of this mid biennium budget adjustment. As mentioned earlier, the City was able to secure the Streamlined Sales Tax Mitigation revenue for at least another two years. Requests and proposals for use of one-time funds were submitted by department directors. In the past, administration worked with department directors to work through the budget proposals. This year we tired a new process and it really gets back to that concept we continue to talk about - being "one Kent." Every decision made is done by looking at requests holistically, as opposed to through the lens of an individual department. As a group, we engaged in great dialogue and in the end collaboratively recommended the projects proposed in this mid-biennium budget adjustment. Through great conversation with department heads and their deputy directors, there is consensus on how the funds should be used. We wanted to treat this mid-biennium adjustment as a true adjustment. Departments were asked to limit their requests for additional expenditures; keeping the requests to only those items that were unforeseeable when the budget was passed. For unanticipated items. This was not the time to ask for new positions, initiatives or items. This mid-biennial budget adjustment includes: • Establishing the 2020 budget for new initiatives approved during 2019 and modifying the budget to reflect the anticipated revenues and expenditures related to programs. An example includes the BWC and red- light camera programs. • Updating revenue forecasts • Final modifications to cost allocations, and • Investing in capital The newly proposed total budget for 2020 totals $345.9 million. This includes an increase to operating expenses, new investments in capital and transfers between funds. Of the total $345.9 million budget, $108.6 million is allocated to the General 8.B.1 Packet Pg. 208 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f O c t 1 , 2 0 1 9 5 : 0 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s ) Kent City Council City Council Special Meeting Minutes October 1, 2019 Kent, Washington Page 3 of 4 Fund. The General Fund will see a $2.3 million or 2.1% increase in expenditures from the adopted budget. Much of the increase in expenditures are offset by revenue adjustments leaving a gap of $577K in which fund balance will be utilized. Most of the added expenses are related to: • Changes already made to positions in 2019 • Use of additional transferred revenues from the red-light cameras • Changes in cost allocation plans, and • Public defense funding. As the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority continues to eliminate contracts with the City for services, we are continuing to see reductions in revenues for those services. The reduced revenues for Information Technology services has left a deficit in the IT fund of $430,000. Part of the mid-biennium budget adjustment modifies allocations from other departments and funds to cover that shortage. In addition, the City expenses will be reduced by fees paid to the PSRFA for fire investigations ($202,120). That cost savings is offset by the cost of hiring two Detectives ($294,280). In the 2019-2020 adopted budget, there was a placeholder in the General Fund for the cost allocation plan. This budget adjustment includes the full implementation of this allocation which equitably shares the eligible costs of the support services departments (Administration, Human Resources, Finance and Law) between departments, programs and funds throughout the City. Although the General Fund budget had been established related to the cost allocation plan, the adopted budget did not include the additional $2.4 million in expenses to each of the other funds. Revenues from investment income was increased to appropriately reflect the projected earnings. A couple of years ago we made changes to how we invest funds. This helped to offset some of the cost related to the allocation plan. For the funds that do not have enough new revenue to cover the new expenses, fund balance will be used. We continued to invest in public safety services. The 2019-2020 budget used revenues from the newly authorized red-light camera program to provide for body worn cameras for police officers. This mid-biennium budget adjustment includes increases in projected red-light camera program revenues as well as related public safety expenditures. In prior years, Sales Tax Mitigation revenues have been used to support General Fund operations. During the State’s budget process, Sales Tax Mitigation to the City was nearly eliminated. The Mayor and councilmembers made multiple trips to the legislature to lobby for the continuation of the funding. The City did not include those revenues in their 2019-2020 budget. After much effort, the City was able to secure that revenue for another two years. Unsure of the certainty of the future of that revenue stream, these 8.B.1 Packet Pg. 209 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f O c t 1 , 2 0 1 9 5 : 0 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s ) Kent City Council City Council Special Meeting Minutes October 1, 2019 Kent, Washington Page 4 of 4 dollars are best treated as one-time monies to be used for one-time projects. An additional $3.85 million from SST combined with available funds from the Capital Resources Fund made possible nearly $6 million in projects. A few of the projects included in the proposed budget are: • Meet Me on Meeker o Driving Range o Promenade which is the section along Kent Elementary • Kent Memorial Park Turf Conversion o Allowing us to leverage grants o Providing opportunities for increased revenues from use of the park all year round • Riverview Park Development • 4th and Willis round-about Greenway Design, and • Mill Creek Canyon Cleanup and restoring of the trails In addition, the proposed budget includes the funding of several projects out of the Criminal Justice Fund including: • Corrections Facilities backup Generator • Corrections Cameras • Corrections/Court Fencing Tonight, I respectfully transmit this mid-biennium budget adjustment to the City Council for consideration. This document is a representation of the collaborative efforts of City leadership, City Council, City staff and the Kent community. I would like to extend my gratitude to City leadership and the Finance Department for their hard work and willingness to embrace the new approach to selecting recommendations to include in the budget amendment. 4. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Ralph adjourned the meeting. Meeting ended at 5:16 p.m. Kimberley A. Komoto City Clerk 8.B.1 Packet Pg. 210 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f O c t 1 , 2 0 1 9 5 : 0 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s ) Pending Approval City Council Workshop Workshop Special Meeting Minutes October 1, 2019 Date: October 1, 2019 Time: 5:30 p.m. Place: Crystal Mountain Hall at Kent Commons I. CALL TO ORDER Council President Boyce called the meeting to order. Attendee Name Title Status Arrived Dennis Higgins Councilmember Present Les Thomas Councilmember Present Bill Boyce Council President Present Dana Ralph Mayor Present Satwinder Kaur Councilmember Present Brenda Fincher Councilmember Present Toni Troutner Councilmember Present Marli Larimer Councilmember Present PRESENTATION 2. 2020 Mid-Biennium Budget Adjustment Process The City of Kent Finance Director, Paula Painter presented an overview of the 2020 mid-biennium budget adjustment process. Painter detailed city-wide operating budget adjustments that total $14.6 million: - General Fund +$2.27 million (page 26) - Special Revenue Fund Operating +$9.56 million (pages 32, 34-35) - Enterprise Funds -$0.27 million (pages 36-38) - Internal Service Funds - +$2.92 million (pages 39-41) - Debt Service Funds - +$0.12 million (page 49) Painter detailed the previously approved expenditures and revenues, including: - Sound Transit Term-Limited Positions - Corrections Officer Term-Limited Positions - Body-worn and red-light camera programs Painter detailed the Capital Additions of $8.3 million. City-wide baseline adjustments were covered relating to: Revenue: 8.B.2 Packet Pg. 211 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f O c t 1 , 2 0 1 9 5 : 3 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s ) City Council Workshop Workshop Special Meeting Minutes October 1, 2019 Kent, Washington Page 2 of 3 - Interest Income - Sales and Utility Tax Expenses: - Central Cost Allocation Plan - GIS Fund - Salaries and Benefits - Paid Family Medical Leave - IT Cost Allocation modification - Utility Clearing Allocation - Public Works Engineering allocation Painter provided information on the operating requests that included requests for: - Increase to public defense funding - IT Maintenance Budget - Business Analyst - Term-Limited Staffing Extension - Detectives Painter provided a broad overview of the general fund revenue and expenditures, in addition to the general fund gap of $577,620. Painter reviewed the proposed capital funding requests that include: - Kent Memorial Park Turf Conversion - $2 million - Riverview Park Development - $1 million - Meet Me on Meeker Promenade - 64th to Kent Elementary - $600k - Tiburon System Replacement Reserves - $550,000 - Meet Me on Meeker - Riverbend - $500,000 - 4th & Willis Greenway Design - $400,000 - Mill Creek Canyon Clean Up - $400,000 - City Gateways Design - $200,000 - Investigation/Patrol Workspace Reconfiguration - $150,000 - Evidence/Crime Scene Van Repair - $100,000 - Network Resiliency - $60,000 - Corrections Generator - $350,000 - Corrections Cameras - $75,000 - Corrections/Court Security Fencing - $70,000 - Cubicle Conversion to Offices - $50,000 (red light camera fund) Painter reviewed the budget process timeline. Councilmembers will send questions to Painter so that responses can be provided to the Council during the October 15, 2019, workshop. Councilmember Higgins advised he will continue to lobby the state for the 8.B.2 Packet Pg. 212 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f O c t 1 , 2 0 1 9 5 : 3 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s ) City Council Workshop Workshop Special Meeting Minutes October 1, 2019 Kent, Washington Page 3 of 3 continuation of streamline sales tax mitigation funds. 3. Adjournment Council President Boyce adjourned the meeting. Meeting ended at 6:24 p.m. Kimberley A. Komoto City Clerk 8.B.2 Packet Pg. 213 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f O c t 1 , 2 0 1 9 5 : 3 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s ) Pending Approval Kent City Council City Council Regular Meeting Minutes October 1, 2019 Date: October 1, 2019 Time: 7:01 p.m. Place: Crystal Mountain Hall at Kent Commons 1. CALL TO ORDER / FLAG SALUTE Mayor Ralph called the meeting to order. 2. ROLL CALL Attendee Name Title Status Arrived Toni Troutner Councilmember Present Marli Larimer Councilmember Present Bill Boyce Council President Present Dana Ralph Mayor Present Satwinder Kaur Councilmember Present Dennis Higgins Councilmember Present Les Thomas Councilmember Present Brenda Fincher Councilmember Present 3. AGENDA APPROVAL A. Approved the Agenda as Presented RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Bill Boyce, Council President SECONDER: Les Thomas, Councilmember AYES: Troutner, Larimer, Boyce, Kaur, Higgins, Thomas, Fincher 4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Ralph recognized Diana Khalilova and Kevin Sanic and commended them for attending the City Council meeting at the beginning of their civics class. Khalilova and Sanic indicated they are attending tonight's meeting to fulfil a requirement of their civics class at Kentwood High School. A. Public Recognition 1. Employee of the Month Mayor Ralph recognized Dave Hobbs as the City's Employee of the Month. Councilmember Thomas recognized Hobbs as a Kiwanis member that goes above and beyond. Hobbs expressed his appreciation for the recognition and thanked the person that nominated him for the award. 2. Proclamation for the Lunar Rovers Celebrating the 50th Anniversary 8.B.3 Packet Pg. 214 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f O c t 1 , 2 0 1 9 7 : 0 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s ) Kent City Council City Council Regular Meeting Minutes October 1, 2019 Kent, Washington Page 2 of 9 Mayor Ralph read the proclamation for the Lunar rovers 50th Anniversary celebration and indicated the month of October is Lunar Rover Month. Mayor Ralph presented the proclamation to Boeing Company Historian, Mike Lombardi. Lombardi expressed his appreciation for the proclamation and expressed thanks to Boeing employees, retired Boeing employees, and the Kent community. 700 employees at Lombardi indicated he is grateful to Mayor Ralph, Michelle Wilmot and staff for recognizing the important role Kent played in us going to the moon - few communities that can claim what we can - a spacecraft on the moon. 3. Proclamation for Domestic Violence Awareness Month Mayor Ralph read the proclamation for Domestic Violence Awareness Month and presented it to Angela Dannenbring, Executive Director with DAWN. Dannenbring expressed her appreciation of the proclamation and provide statistics of DAWN's work throughout the Kent community. Mayor Ralph indicated the DAWN offices are located in downtown Kent and they are working tirelessly to support victims of domestic violence and make them survivors in addition to working on prevention. 4. Reappointments to the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Mayor Ralph recognized Bryan Powell, John Casey, David Kwok and Tim Higgins as reappointment to the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee. B. Community Events Council President Boyce provided information on upcoming events at the accesso ShoWare Center. Visit accessoShoWare.com for event details. Council President Fincher advised of the two upcoming City Council candidate forums. October 16th at 6 p.m. at the Kent Commons, hosted by the Kent Cultural Communities Board and October 22nd at 6 p.m. at the Kent Commons, hosted by the Kent Black Action Commission. Fincher detailed past and upcoming Spotlight series events. Councilmember Kaur advised of the Kent Rotary Backpack Buddies events that are held on the first wednesday of the month. The next event is October 2nd at 5:30 p.m. at the Seattle Union Gospel Mission in Kent. Visit the Kent Rotary facebook page for additional details. C. Economic and Community Development Report City of Kent Chief Economic Development Officer, Bill Ellis provided the council with an update on the Naden Avenue assemblage. Washington State has approved channelization plans (access) to Willis Street. This is a huge milestone as it will allow the developer to have direct access to 8.B.3 Packet Pg. 215 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f O c t 1 , 2 0 1 9 7 : 0 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s ) Kent City Council City Council Regular Meeting Minutes October 1, 2019 Kent, Washington Page 3 of 9 the highway. Negotiations continue with a hospitality development company in addition to negotiations with Puget Sound Energy regarding the easement and improvements to the interurban trail. Ellis indicated the right-of-way acquisition in front of Kent Elementary for the Meeker Street promenade will need to be unique to meet school's needs. Staff is working with the district and believe there is an opportunity to create new access from Meeker Street. Ellis indicated Liberty Motors purchased Valley Tools and will manufacture three-wheeled vehicles. This new business in downtown Kent is a direct result of the change to the DCE zoning - light manufacturing. Manini's Gluten-Free Pasta is expanding its Kent manufacturing business. Project Feast's new Executive Director is Van Nguyen. Ellis detailed the changing nature of work and the importance of building a workforce pipeline from our schools directly into our manufacturing base. Additionally, Ellis talked about the need to invest in people and the place of work. Ellis indicated UPS has won broad FAA approval for delivery with drones. Ellis indicated there are plans to set up drug deliveries on hospital campuses. Ellis updated the Council on recent headlines regarding continuing growth in value of warehousing as an asset for the world's biggest investment houses...a refuge for wealth managers. Ellis broke down the employment growth in the Valley. Ellis indicated the City of Kent has been awarded the John D. Spellman Preservation Award "honoring those who prot3ecxt, restore, and interpret the places [lunar rovers] that tell our story." Ellis expressed appreciation of the work of Michelle Wilmot, Danielle Butsick, and the Kent Downtown Partnership. 5. REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES, COUNCIL, AND STAFF A. Mayor's Report Mayor Ralph recognized the City's Multimedia Department for winning five awards from the National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors as follows: 8.B.3 Packet Pg. 216 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f O c t 1 , 2 0 1 9 7 : 0 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s ) Kent City Council City Council Regular Meeting Minutes October 1, 2019 Kent, Washington Page 4 of 9 Category: Military Award of Honor for “Military Experience at the Kent Police Department” Category: Public Safety Award of Excellence for “Beyond the Blue - Police Rifle Training Day” Category: Promotion of a City Award of Distinction for “We Are Kent 2019” Category: Instruction/Training Award of Honor for “The Launch of eConnect” Category: Use of Humor Award of Honor for “Porch Pirates Public Service Announcement” Mayor Ralph advised of the upcoming Town Hall Meetings that will be held October 19th from noon to 1:30 p.m. at the Kentridge High School library and October 24th from 6:30 - 8 p.m. at the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Station 73 on the West Hill of Kent. B. Chief Administrative Officer's Report Chief Administrative Officer, Derek Matheson encouraged council members to focus on pages 28-29 and 90-91 of the Proposed 2020 Mid Biennium Budget Adjustment book. Staff will reach out to council members to compile questions for presentation on during the October 15th workshop. Matheson advised Mayor Ralph appointed new municipal court Judge, Anthony Gipe beginning January 1st. Gipe will replace retiring judge Phillips and will join Judge Michael Frans. Matheson's report is in tonight's agenda packet and there is no executive session tonight. C. Councilmember's Reports Council President Boyce reported the Mayor presented her proposed 2020 mid-biennium budget adjustment during a special meeting tonight. The Mayor, Matheson and the leadership team worked together to come up with one-time budget adjustments. Boyce expressed his appreciation for the proposed allocations to benefit the City's park system. Boyce advised the first Committee of the Whole meeting will be held on October 8th. Councilmember Larimer serves on the King Country Affordable Housing Committee and detailed the committees recommendations on the use of 8.B.3 Packet Pg. 217 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f O c t 1 , 2 0 1 9 7 : 0 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s ) Kent City Council City Council Regular Meeting Minutes October 1, 2019 Kent, Washington Page 5 of 9 funds received through HB1406. The committee also heard a presentation that focused on viewing housing through the lens of equity. Councilmember Kaur serves on the King County Growth Management Council. During the last meeting the council received an update on the affordable housing committee's work on HB 1406 and the eight priority actions. The Council also received an update on potential annexation areas and whether or not the annexation funds cities receive is adequate. Councilmembner Higgins serves on the King County Regional Transit Committee. During the recent workshop the committee reviewed the mobility framework and heard a presentation on the Equity Cabinet that was formed to review the Metro Connects Plan. The Cabinet identified census block groups that were in need of enhanced transit services. Many of these block groups are concentrat4ed in South King County. Councilmember Troutner land Chief Padilla attended the recent Law, Safety and Justice Committee. The committee discussed homelessness and the plan to create a King county Regional Homelessness Authority. Councilmember Thomas serves on the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Governance Board and will meet on October 2nd at 5:30 at Station 78 in Covington. Councilmember Fincher serves on the Sound Cities Association Mental Illness and Drug Dependency Oversight Committee. The Committee focused on discussing the process to get programs added to the funding list. The Committee also discussed the five community courts operating throughout the county. Councilmember Fincher serves on the Sound Cities Association King Conservation District Advisory Committee. The food program grants were discussed with the main goal of enhancing the food delivery system and nutritionally dense food in the county. Councilmember Fincher provided details on past and upcoming Spotlight Series events. 6. PUBLIC HEARING None 7. PUBLIC COMMENT Tim Brown, a Kent resident, expressed his appreciation for everyone that participated in the Team up 2 Clean Up event at Earthworks Park. 8.B.3 Packet Pg. 218 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f O c t 1 , 2 0 1 9 7 : 0 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s ) Kent City Council City Council Regular Meeting Minutes October 1, 2019 Kent, Washington Page 6 of 9 Val Caspaar, a Kent Business owner in Kent suggested efficiencies in the fire department Zandria Michaud, a Kent resident, expressed her appreciation of the Council's change creating the Committee of the Whole. Michaud expressed her appreciation for the Council providing for additional funding for parks in the Proposed Budget Adjustment. Van Hurst, a Kent resident, expressed his frustrations wi th City staff and the lack of response to repair potholes, handrails, a traffic controller, and guardrail. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Bill Boyce, Council President SECONDER: Les Thomas, Councilmember AYES: Troutner, Larimer, Boyce, Kaur, Higgins, Thomas, Fincher A. Approval of Minutes 1. City Council Meeting - City Council Special Meeting - Sep 17, 2019 5:00 PM 2. Council Workshop - Workshop Special Meeting - Sep 17, 2019 5:05 PM 3. City Council Meeting - City Council Regular Meeting - Sep 17, 2019 7:00 PM B. Payment of Bills MOTION: Approve the payment of bills received through 8/15/19 and paid on 8/15/19 and bills received through 8/31/19 and paid on 8/31/19, and approve the checks issued for payroll for 8/1/19-8/15/19 and paid on 8/20/19 and checks issued for payroll 8/16/19-8/31/19 and paid on 8/5/19, after auditing by the Operations Committee on 9/5/19. C. Set October 15, 2019 as the Date for the Public Hearing on the Comprehensive Plan/Capital Facilities Element Amendment to Incorporate School District Capital Facilities Plan and Update to Kent City Code Chapter 12.13, School Impact Fees MOTION: Set October 15, 2019 as the Date for the Public Hearing on the Comprehensive Plan/Capital Facilities Element Amendment to Incorporate School District Capital Facilities Plan and Update to Kent City Code Chapter 12.13, School Impact Fees. 8.B.3 Packet Pg. 219 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f O c t 1 , 2 0 1 9 7 : 0 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s ) Kent City Council City Council Regular Meeting Minutes October 1, 2019 Kent, Washington Page 7 of 9 D. Set October 15, 2019 as the Date for the Second Public Hearing on the 2020 Mid-Biennium Budget Adjustment MOTION: Set October 15, 2019 as the Date for the Second Public Hearing on the 2020 Mid-Biennium Budget Adjustment. E. Set October 15, 2019 as the Date for the Second Public Hearing on the 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Plan MOTION: Set October 15, 2019 as the Date for the Second Public Hearing on the 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Plan. F. Set October 15, 2019 as the Date for the Public Hearing on the 2019 Tax Levy for the 2020 Budget MOTION: Set October 15, 2019 as the Date for the Public Hearing on the 2019 Tax Levy for the 2020 Budget. G. Set October 15, 2019 as the Date for the Public Hearing to Consider Declaring Certain Public Utility Equipment and Materials Surplus MOTION: Set October 15, 2019 as the Date for the Public Hearing to Consider Declaring Certain Public Utility Equipment and Materials Surplus. H. Puget Sound Energy Schedule 74 Underground Conversion Project Construction Agreement – Fourth Avenue and Willis Roundabout – Authorize MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to sign a Schedule 74 Underground Conversion Construction Agreement with Puget Sound Energy in an amount not to exceed $ 112,430. to underground existing overhead power in the vicinity of the Willis Street and 4th Avenue South intersection, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public Works Director. I. Consultant Services Agreement with KPG, P.S. for the Fourth and Willis Roundabout Drainage and Landscape Design – Authorize MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to sign a Consultant Services Agreement with KPG, Inc, in an amount not to exceed $78,801. for drainage and landscape design for the Willis Street and 4th Avenue South roundabout project, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public Works Director. J. Quit Claim Deed and Temporary Construction Easement between the City of Kent and the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority – Authorize 8.B.3 Packet Pg. 220 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f O c t 1 , 2 0 1 9 7 : 0 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s ) Kent City Council City Council Regular Meeting Minutes October 1, 2019 Kent, Washington Page 8 of 9 MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to sign a quit claim deed to Sound Transit for a 186 square-foot portion of King County Tax Parcel No. 282204-9017, and a temporary construction easement on the same parcel that will remain in effect until December 31, 2024. K. Easement for Puget Sound Energy - 640 Pressure Zone North Pump Station No. 1 – Authorize MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to sign all documents necessary to provide Puget Sound Energy an easement for power service on parcel No. 1722059184 for the 640 Pressure Zone North Pump Station; subject to the final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public Works Director. L. Commercial Electric Facilities Contract with Puget Sound Energy Power Service Upgrade for 640 Pressure Zone Pump Station – Authorize MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to sign a Commercial Electric Facilities Contract with Puget Sound Energy in an amount not to exceed $139,242.77, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public Works Director. M. Solid Waste Management Local Solid Waste Financial Assistance Agreement with State of Washington Department of Ecology – Authorize MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to sign the Department of Ecology Local Solid Waste Financial Assistance Agreement Grant in the amount not to exceed $61,070.67, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public Works Director. N. Resolution of Intent – Sales and Use Tax for Affordable Housing - Adopt MOTION: Adopt Resolution No. 1995, declaring the City's intent to authorize a sales and use tax for affordable and supportive housing in accordance with Substitute House Bill 1406. O. Ordinance Adopting 2018 Docketed Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Adopt MOTION: Adopt Ordinance No. 4335, approving 2018 docketed comprehensive plan amendments CPA-2018-5, as proposed by the applicant, and CPA-2018-2, as modified by staff-proposed alternative Option 2, as presented by staff. P. Reappoint Bryan Powell, John Casey, David Kwok and Tim Higgins to the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee – Confirm 8.B.3 Packet Pg. 221 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f O c t 1 , 2 0 1 9 7 : 0 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s ) Kent City Council City Council Regular Meeting Minutes October 1, 2019 Kent, Washington Page 9 of 9 MOTION: Confirm the following reappointments to the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee: Bryan Powell for a three-year term that will expire on May 31, 2022; John Casey and David Kwok for three-year terms that will expire on July 31, 2022; and Tim Higgins for a three-year term that will expire on September 5, 2022. 9. OTHER BUSINESS None 10. BIDS A. Kent Correctional Facility Fencing Project Bid - Award Nate Harper, Facilities Capital Project Manager, provided details on the Kent Correctional Facility Fencing Project Bid and provided clarification on the unresponsive bid. MOTION: Award the Kent Correctional Facility Fencing Project to Olympic Peninsula Construction, Inc. in the amount of $205,645 and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary documents, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Director. RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Toni Troutner, Councilmember SECONDER: Bill Boyce, Council President AYES: Troutner, Larimer, Boyce, Kaur, Higgins, Thomas, Fincher 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION AND ACTION AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION None 12. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Ralph adjourned the meeting. Meeting ended at 8:25 p.m. Kimberley A. Komoto City Clerk 8.B.3 Packet Pg. 222 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f O c t 1 , 2 0 1 9 7 : 0 0 P M ( A p p r o v a l o f M i n u t e s ) DATE: October 15, 2019 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Ordinance Eliminating References to Council Committees from the Kent City Code - Adopt MOTION: Adopt Ordinance No. ____, amending the Kent City Code by eliminating references to the Operations Committee and the Public Safety Committee. SUMMARY: Decades ago, the Kent City Council created various three-member committees, including the Economic and Community Development Committee, the Operations Committee, the Parks Committee, the Public Safety Committee, and the Public Works Committee. Over time, references to some of the council committees have been added to the Kent City Code for the purposes of appointing councilmembers to serve on various boards, committees and commissions. On September 17, 2019, the Kent City Council eliminated the various three- member council committees, and in their place, created a committee called the Committee of the Whole which is made up of the full membership of the Kent City Council. This house-keeping ordinance eliminates the references to the Operations Committee that currently appear in Kent City Code sections 2.54.020 relating to the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee, 2.59.020 relating to the Regional Fire Authority, 3.02.080 relating to the City Investment Policy, and 3.03.010 relating to the Payment of Claims, Demands and Vouchers. It also eliminates a reference to the Public Safety committee in KCC 2.59.020 relating to the Regional Fire Authority. SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Innovative Government ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance to Change Committee References (PDF) 10/08/19 Committee of the Whole RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS 8.C Packet Pg. 223 RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS Next: 10/15/2019 7:00 PM 8.C Packet Pg. 224 Ordinance Eliminating References to Council Committees from Kent City Code ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending sections 2.54.020, 2.59.020, 3.02.080 and 3.03.010 of the Kent City Code relating to eliminate references to the operations committee. RECITALS A. Decades ago, the Kent City Council created various three- member committees, including the Economic and Community Development Committee, the Operations Committee, the Parks Committee, the Public Safety Committee, and the Public Works Committee. B. Over time, references to some of the council committees have been added to the Kent City Code for the purposes of appointing councilmembers to serve on various boards, committees and commissions. C. On September 17, 2019, the Kent City Council eliminated the various three-member council committees, and in their place, created a committee called the Committee of the Whole which is made up of the full membership of the Kent City Council. D. This ordinance eliminates the references to the Operations Committee that currently appear in Kent City Code sections 2.54.020 relating to the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee, 2.59.020 relating to the Regional Fire Authority, 3.02.080 relating to the City Investment Policy, 8.C.a Packet Pg. 225 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e t o C h a n g e C o m m i t t e e R e f e r e n c e s ( 2 0 0 7 : O r d i n a n c e E l i m i n a t i n g R e f e r e n c e s t o C o u n c i l C o m m i t t e e s f r o m t h e K e n t C i t y Ordinance Eliminating References to Council Committees from Kent City Code and 3.03.010 relating to the Payment of Claims, demands and Vouchers. It also eliminates a reference to the Public Safety committee in KCC 2.59.020 relating to the Regional Fire Authority. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE SECTION 1. – Amendment – KCC 2.54.020. Section 2.54.020 of the Kent City Code entitled “Membership,” is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 2.54.020 Membership. The lodging tax advisory committee shall consist of nine members as follows: A. Four members appointed by the city council who are representatives of businesses required to collect tax under Chapter 67.28 RCW; B. Four members appointed by the city council who are persons involved in activities authorized to be funded by revenue received under Chapter 67.28 RCW; and C. The council president shall appoint a member of council’s operations committee the council to serve as a member of and to chair the lodging tax advisory committee. SECTION 2. – Amendment – KCC 2.59.020. Section 2.59.020 of the Kent City Code entitled “Governing board appointment,” is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 2.59.020 Governing board appointment. The council president shall appoint three (3) members of the Kent city council to serve as the city of Kent’s representatives on the governing 8.C.a Packet Pg. 226 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e t o C h a n g e C o m m i t t e e R e f e r e n c e s ( 2 0 0 7 : O r d i n a n c e E l i m i n a t i n g R e f e r e n c e s t o C o u n c i l C o m m i t t e e s f r o m t h e K e n t C i t y Ordinance Eliminating References to Council Committees from Kent City Code board. All council members are eligible to serve on the governing board, but at least (1) governing board member must be a current member of the council’s public safety committee and one (1) governing board member must be a current member of the council’s operations committee. SECTION 3. – Amendment – KCC 3.02.080. Section 3.02.080 of the Kent City Code entitled “Performance standards, reporting requirements, and advisory investment committee,” is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 3.02.080 Performance standards, reporting requirements, and advisory investment committee. A. Performance standards. The city’s investment portfolio will be designed to obtain a market average rate of return during budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the city’s investment risk constraints and cash flow needs. Appropriate benchmarks shall be established against which portfolio performance shall be compared on a regular basis. The benchmarks shall be reflective of the actual securities being purchased and a comparison to the LGIP earnings rate should be completed on a regular basis. B. Advisory investment committee. An investment committee will be established consisting of the mayor (or designee), finance director, the public works director, and a member of the council operations committee, who shall be appointed by the mayor to serve a two-year term, which term shall run concurrently with the term of the council president, except to the extent interim appointments become necessary. The committee will meet quarterly and will be established to serve in a general review and advisory capacity, taking into account the city’s investment objectives, available funds and current market conditions. The committee will review periodic reports which may include, but are not limited to: market value of 8.C.a Packet Pg. 227 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e t o C h a n g e C o m m i t t e e R e f e r e n c e s ( 2 0 0 7 : O r d i n a n c e E l i m i n a t i n g R e f e r e n c e s t o C o u n c i l C o m m i t t e e s f r o m t h e K e n t C i t y Ordinance Eliminating References to Council Committees from Kent City Code the portfolio, percentages by type and institution, average life of the portfolio, expected cash flows, and average rate of return. SECTION 4. – Amendment – KCC 3.03.010. Section 3.03.010 of the Kent City Code entitled “City auditing officer,” is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 3.03.010 City auditing officer. The operations committee, or its authorized council president, or his or her designee, shall serve as the city auditing officer and shall act as auditor for the city for all claims, demands and vouchers presented to the city council for approval. Such claims, demands, and vouchers shall be prepared for audit and payment on a form providing for the authentication and certification by the auditing officer that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered or the labor performed as described, and the claim, demand, or voucher is a just, true, and unpaid obligation against the city. SECTION 5. – Severability. If any one or more section, subsection, or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 6. – Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering; or references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations. SECTION 7. – Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law. 8.C.a Packet Pg. 228 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e t o C h a n g e C o m m i t t e e R e f e r e n c e s ( 2 0 0 7 : O r d i n a n c e E l i m i n a t i n g R e f e r e n c e s t o C o u n c i l C o m m i t t e e s f r o m t h e K e n t C i t y Ordinance Eliminating References to Council Committees from Kent City Code DANA RALPH, MAYOR Date Approved ATTEST: KIMBERLEY A. KOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted Date Published APPROVED AS TO FORM: ARTHUR “PAT” FITZPATRICK, CITY ATTORNEY 8.C.a Packet Pg. 229 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e t o C h a n g e C o m m i t t e e R e f e r e n c e s ( 2 0 0 7 : O r d i n a n c e E l i m i n a t i n g R e f e r e n c e s t o C o u n c i l C o m m i t t e e s f r o m t h e K e n t C i t y DATE: October 15, 2019 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Bill of Sale to Clear Title at 303 West Meeker Street - Authorize MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to execute a Bill of Sale for improvements at 303 West Meeker Street to Southworth Properties, LLC., together with all other necessary documents, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney. SUMMARY: Many years ago, the City temporarily used the buildings generally located at 303 West Meeker Street for police and fire training exercises. As part of the arrangement for use of the buildings, the property owner purported to gift to the City, through a Bill of Sale, all of its legal interest in the buildings, fixtures, and improvements. The City has maintained its position over the years that it has no ownership interest in the property, since the Bill of Sale from the previous owner was ineffectual and unnecessary. However, to ensure that any issues of legal title in the property are cleared from public record, the City should execute a “remedial” Bill of Sale in favor of the current owner that clearly asserts the City’s position that it has no legal ownership in the property, and dismisses any interest it may have acquired unintentionally. The proposed Bill of Sale and associated Real Estate Excise Tax Affidavit would remove any ambiguity regarding ownership of the buildings, and allows the most recent purchaser of the property, Southworth Properties, to move forward with its plans for redevelopment. SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Thriving City ATTACHMENTS: 1. Bill of Sale - Kent to Southworth Properties (PDF) 10/08/19 Committee of the Whole RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS 8.D Packet Pg. 230 RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS Next: 10/15/2019 7:00 PM 8.D Packet Pg. 231 BILL OF SALE - Page 1 of 4 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City of Kent 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, Washington 98032 ATTN: Property Services Grantor: City of Kent Grantee: _Southworth Properties, LLC___ Abbreviated Legal Description: 303 West Meeker Street Assessor’s Legal Description: YESLER'S FIRST ADDITION TO TOWN OF KENT E__ HALF OF LOTS 9 AND 12 AND ALL OF LOTS 10 AND 13 BLK 5 Previous Bill of Sale Legal Description: LOTS 10 AND 11, BLOCK 5, YESLER’S FIRST ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF KENT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 62, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Assessor's Tax Parcel ID No.: 982570-0285-05; 982570-0285-96 BILL OF SALE In February of 2006, Second Avenue Real Estate LLC and PBB Real Estate LLC, through their authorized member, Benjamin G. Porter, purported to gift to the City of Kent, through a Bill of Sale, all of Second Avenue’s “right, title, and interest in and to all buildings, fixtures, and improvements located on and above the land with the addresses of 301 West Gowe Street, 111 North Second Avenue, and 304 West Harrison Street, Kent, Washington.” In the Bill of Sale, the improvements are said to be located upon land legally described as “Lots 10 and 11, Block 5, Yesler’s First Addition to the Town of Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, Page 62, King 8.D.a Packet Pg. 232 At t a c h m e n t : B i l l o f S a l e - K e n t t o S o u t h w o r t h P r o p e r t i e s ( 1 9 9 9 : B i l l o f S a l e t o C l e a r T i t l e a t 3 0 3 W e s t M e e k e r S t r e e t - A u t h o r i z e ) BILL OF SALE - Page 2 of 4 County, Washington.” A copy of this Bill of Sale is attached as Exhibit A. The buildings, fixtures, and improvements described above and in Exhibit A are hereafter referred to as the “Property.” While it is the City’s position that it has no ownership interest in the property, to ensure that any issues of legal title in the Property are cleared from public record, effective _____, 2019, the City of Kent (“Grantor”) hereby quit claims, transfers and conveys any and all right, title, and interest in the Property that it may own as a result of the Bill of Sale that became effective on February 8, 2006, between Second Avenue Real Estate, LLC and the City of Kent to Southworth Properties, LLC (“Grantee”). This Bill of Sale shall be devoid of any and all warranties, guarantees, and assurances whatsoever with regards to the ownership or condition of the Property. By signing this Bill of Sale, Grantee acknowledges there are no warranties, guarantees, and assurances whatsoever with regards to the ownership or condition of the Property created by this Bill of Sale, waives any and all claims, whether known or unknown, that it may have against Grantor relating to the Property, and will indemnify and defend Grantor in any and all actions or claims against Grantor with regards to this Bill of Sale. 8.D.a Packet Pg. 233 At t a c h m e n t : B i l l o f S a l e - K e n t t o S o u t h w o r t h P r o p e r t i e s ( 1 9 9 9 : B i l l o f S a l e t o C l e a r T i t l e a t 3 0 3 W e s t M e e k e r S t r e e t - A u t h o r i z e ) BILL OF SALE - Page 3 of 4 GRANTOR: ________________________________ By: Title: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Name: Kent City Attorney -Notary Seal Must Appear Within This Box- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. (Signature) NOTARY PUBLIC, in and for the State of Washington, residing at My appointment expires 8.D.a Packet Pg. 234 At t a c h m e n t : B i l l o f S a l e - K e n t t o S o u t h w o r t h P r o p e r t i e s ( 1 9 9 9 : B i l l o f S a l e t o C l e a r T i t l e a t 3 0 3 W e s t M e e k e r S t r e e t - A u t h o r i z e ) BILL OF SALE - Page 4 of 4 GRANTEE: ________________________________ By: Title: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: -Notary Seal Must Appear Within This Box- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. (Signature) NOTARY PUBLIC, in and for the State of Washington, residing at My appointment expires 8.D.a Packet Pg. 235 At t a c h m e n t : B i l l o f S a l e - K e n t t o S o u t h w o r t h P r o p e r t i e s ( 1 9 9 9 : B i l l o f S a l e t o C l e a r T i t l e a t 3 0 3 W e s t M e e k e r S t r e e t - A u t h o r i z e ) ^ ¡,*.ffi*:i'lslsi ".ibil?rál,"i4iti <.¡¡ ì¡.¿È ör ¡x,t r ¡ s. i¡i? ll{ KNOW ALL PFBS0NS BY Tr-$E iRESE{r8 rhr c&crivd Fti-hll¡y t';;2s06.,ii,,, sc€e{rú ¡ttur¡ã nÊd Eúú0 LfÆ, q Wçbt¡gñü t¡$üfd ü¡tl¡ily cm!ü,y f-sfqt{ AvcnuoJ grva end convrycd o úc CÍry of K.rnt (îGrt') ¡¡ q trnr¿tüicted r¡¡d ourrþhr S$ wírhout Éy'ryti{ildon d Ërú ofdl of Sæud"{vcnu¿'stighL tittq lr¡d infcrEst in rrd to all bttldngl ÉCr¡rcs, rnd ímpmræucnU tocdcd m t¡rd ¡bovo t¡ô lúd wïlll tt e addçs¡cc of l0l Wcs GAï{q Stt,t*, I l t Ngltt Seoô¡d Avc¡ruê, å!d 3ß Wcat Hmisol¡ Stsrt, Kcm, Wr¡htu¡ou. Tbo lud rrpon which rhc kngrgrnurentr a¡c locrtcd ig Íç¡rüyergd¡q¿ u tnr l0ad llrBlocl f, Ycslc¡rÉ ftit Additio¡tothcTo.wn of filrE *co¡¿fqg tu ÌhË plctÉc{.cofrcco¡dêôtoVoi,sr S ofþl¡ts,P#Ë 62¡KlsgCou¡iy , Wrúingtd" Scoond Avè¡uc r¡rccc to indcmnis, holtl h¡rmtca¡, lnd d.fürd Kcot fmu rll el¡lm¡ mrdo 4rlnrt Kæt for mviro¡mr¡.rtrl brzard! or cont¡mÍrülon oFürc plopcrty evn to-¡ct¡ rr wËll as ürc tand bcncrü ù. p*¡çrty glwn rq lqlqr. AJ |1¡oh ltùç a¡ f<-f Uf no Am¿r u¡a for üãtulHhgr, $aurËe rnd ¡Éprú,rerûchtq grvcú ro lr byl:' Scdoud .{Ùchuc, Scoônd Avauc lg¡ccE, !t fs solo c¡st sqcnrc, t¡d li¡b¡lity to, iftcr rcguipt of rlt rçquired dcdolition pe¡n{c md liccnScs, ¡Ëüove nc buildi¡g+ fixu¡rc¡ ¡nd irnp¡ovsmmt Ëom ¡he l.n,f. Sæ¡iqd.{vÈnuc oOvqprg tailrgrËês lo ånd ¡,ilb lC¡at r}nr $Éto¡d Avc¡r¡a ir rhc or¡vnsr of$c gfftêdpÞFËrty Þ Éüd cleri of rny lÍc¡s, ¡ccr¡rity intc¡ssu ø indch¿dness, bar goöd rigbç ¡4d ñrll *shorlty to gfi ùc g¡rnc, rqd. rht'Þç'û¿ Åvmuc rvill u/r¡¡¡¡r' 1 EXHIBIT A 8.D.a Packet Pg. 236 At t a c h m e n t : B i l l o f S a l e - K e n t t o S o u t h w o r t h P r o p e r t i e s ( 1 9 9 9 : B i l l o f S a l e t o C l e a r T i t l e a t 3 0 3 W e s t M e e k e r S t r e e t - A u t h o r i z e ) t, , :'a*re tSr5t ' clrY of KEHÍ 25i Þà É.'rt44 '!'.F¡r-llr ü4 dfrll tlÉ É hffiy u.d. S Ersû q{ $fl $Fr rq{ d.ftryi rta ¡rS o Sufcr s Bt ')\: By , ...,=,".,.Ú", .. 2 ri,t' ''ffi."wüffi r'r¡'{-*; ¡.¡$ r' iii¡iii¡mít F.qJ.. ; :.. 8.D.a Packet Pg. 237 At t a c h m e n t : B i l l o f S a l e - K e n t t o S o u t h w o r t h P r o p e r t i e s ( 1 9 9 9 : B i l l o f S a l e t o C l e a r T i t l e a t 3 0 3 W e s t M e e k e r S t r e e t - A u t h o r i z e ) -o.ron*n o, fQlKevenue \\- Woshinston Stdte- REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX AFFIDAVIT rhis fom is your receipt PLEASE rYPE oR PRINT CHAPTER 82.45 RCW - CHAPTER 458-61 A WAC when stamped by cashier. THIS AFFIDAVIT WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS ALL AREAS ON ALL PAGES ARE FULLY COMPLETEI) (See brck of Iret page for instructions) Str€et address of property 11'l N Semnd Ave and 30d W Herisnn sl This property is located in Kent I Check box ifmy ofthe listed parcels ae being segregated from mother pacel, ue part ofa boundary line adjustment or puc€ls being merged. Legal description of property (if more space is needed, you may attach a separate sheet to each page of the affidavit) LOTS 1O AND 1 1, BLOCK 5, YESLER'S FIRST ADDITION TO THE TO\A/N OF KENT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 62, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Select Land IJse List all personal property (tmgible and intangible) included in selling price. enter any additional (See back of last page for instructions) yES Was dre sellu receiving aproperty hx exemptior or defsral mds tr clnpters 84.36, 84.37, or 84.38 RCW (nmprcfit organizatiorf s€nior citizen, or disabled person, hommmm wilh limited incomef If claiming an exemption, list WAC number and reason for exemption: NO tr h this property designatod as forest land per ch4ter 84.33 RCW? Is tlds propsty classified as curent use (een space, frm and agriculuml, mtimber) landperchqterS4.34 RCW? Is ttis prcperty receiving special valuatiol as histmical property p€r chapt€r 84.26 RCW? Ifany ansv€rs re yes, complete as instucted below. (1) NOTICEOFCONTII\IUAI\CE (IOREST r.{NDORCURRENT USE) NEW OWNER(S): To continue the cunent designation as forest land or clrosification as current ue (opm space, fam and agriculhre, or timber) land, you must sign on (3) below. The county assessor must tlm detemine if the land transfened mntinues to qualifr and will indicate by signing below. Ifthe land no longer qualifies or you do not wish to continue the designation or classification, it will be rmoved and the compensating or additional taxes will be due and payable by the seller or transferor at the time ofsale. (RCW 84.33.140 or RCW 84.34.108). hior to signing (3) below, you may contact your ltral county assessor for more infomation. Thisland Idoes @doesnot qualifyforcontinuance. DEPUTYASSESSOR DA'IE (2) NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE (I{ISTORIC PROPERTY) WAC No. (Section/Subsection)wAc 458-614-205 Reason for exemption Transfers from a govemment enlily Type of Document Bill of Sale Date ofDocument Gross Selling Price (0.00 iPersonal Property (deduct)e Exemption Claimed (deduct) Taxable Selling Price 0.00 Excise Tax : State 0.00 0.0050 Local 0.00 *Delinquent Interest: State Local +Delinquent Penalty Subtotal *State Technology Fee *Affi davit Processing Fee Total Due YES NOtrgtr@ tra NEW OWNER(S): To continue special valuation as historic property, sign (3) below. Ifthe new owner(s) does not wish to continue, all additional tu calculated pursuant to chapter 84.26 RCW, shall be due and payable by the seller or transferor at the time ofsale. (3) OWNER(S) STGNATURE 0.00 5.00 0.00 t 10.00 PRINT NAME A MINIMUM OF $1O.OO IS DUE IN FEE(S) AND/OR TAX +SEE INSTRUCTIONS I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY oF PERJURY THAT THE FoREGoING Is TRUE AND coRREcT Signature of Grante€ or Grantee's Agent _ Name (print)Joseph Velling Date & city ofsigning:September _, 2019; Bellevue, WA Perjury: Perjury is a class C felony which is punishable by imprisoilnent in the state conectional institution for a maximm tem ofnot more than five yean, or by a fine in an amount fixed bv the court ofnot more than five tlousmd dollm or by bo0r imprisonment and fine (RCW 94.20.020 (lC). Signature of Grantor or Grantor's AgGnt _ Name (print) Date & city of signing: September , 2019: Kent. WA &tre42 Fti' Nme Cifu of Kent Mailing ^aa-^-- tri traildh A.,an' 'a Snr rth Citylstatelzip Phone No. (including aea trdedF,z5<6& ea'Prnnorliae I I fl a Washinoton limited liabilitv comDanv Mailing Addres 4056 134th Avenue SE City/State/Zip Bellevue. Washinqton 98006 Phone No. (including ueacode)(425) 747-4975 Send all property tu conespondence to: @ Same 4 Buyer/Grmtee Nme Mailing Address City/State/Zip Phone No. (including area List all real ud personal property tax prcel account numberc - check box ifpemonal property 982s70-0285-05 E List osessed value(s) s730.700.00 5 or more unib)13-resid€nce REV 84 0001a (09/14116)THIS SPACE. TREASURER'S USE ONLY COUNTY TREASURER Exhibit B 8.D.a Packet Pg. 238 At t a c h m e n t : B i l l o f S a l e - K e n t t o S o u t h w o r t h P r o p e r t i e s ( 1 9 9 9 : B i l l o f S a l e t o C l e a r T i t l e a t 3 0 3 W e s t M e e k e r S t r e e t - A u t h o r i z e ) RavEfriigre Woshinston Stote' REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX AFFIDAVIT rhis fom isyourreceipt PLEASE rYPE oR PRINr CHAPTER 82.45 RCW - CHAPTER 458-61A WAC when sramped by cashier. THIS AFFIDAVIT WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS ALL AREAS ON ALL PAGES ARE FIJLLY COMPI,ETED (See back oflmt page for instructions) to Street address of property:'l 1 1 N Sc..nd AvE an.i ?nd W Hededn Ct This property is located in Kent I Check box if my ofthe listed parcels de being segregated from mother ptrcel, {e part ofa boundary line adjustment or pilcels being merged. Legal description of property (if more space is needed, you may attach a separate sheet to each page of the affidavit) LOTS 1O AND 1 1, BLOCK 5, YESLER'S FIRST ADDITION TO THE TOVVII OF KENT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 62, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Select Land Use List all personal property (tangible and intangible) included in selling pnce. enter any additional (See back of last page for instructions) yEs Was tre sello receiving a property tax s(ernption or deferrdl rmder tr clnpt€rs 84.36, 84.37, or 84.38 RCW (nonprofit oryanizatiorL ssnitr citiznn, or disabled perso4 homeowner witr limited inmme! If claiming an exemption, list WAC number and reason for exemption NO tr Is lhis propsty designated as forcst land per chapt€r 84.33 RCW? Is this pro,pqty classified as crrrurt use (open space, frm and agrioltural, or timber) lmd per chaptu 84.34? Is ftis propaty receiving spwial valualm as historical poperty perclnps84.26 RCW? If any answus ae yc, mplete as instsuct€d below. O) NOTICE OFCOMINUAI\ICE (FORBST I,ANDORCTJRRENT USE) NEW OWNER(S): To continue the cunmt designation as forest land or classification as cunent use (open space, farm and agricultue, or timber) land, you must sign on (3) below. The county assssr mNt then detemline if the land ransfened continues to qualiry and will indicate by signing below. Ifthe land no longr qualifies oryou do not wish to continue the designation or classification, it will be removed and the compmsating or additional taxes will be due md payable by the seller or u'ansferor at 0le time of sale. (RCW 84.33.140 or RCW 84.34.108). Prior o signing (3) below, you mny contact your local county assessor for more information. This land froes El does not quali$ for continuance. DEPUTY ASSESSOR DATE (2) NOTICE OF COMPLIANCf, (TIISTORIC PROPERTY) NEW OWNER(S): To continue special valuation as historic property, sign (3) below. Ifthe new owner(s) does not wish to continue, all additional tax calculated pusuant to chapter 84.26 RCW, shall be due and payable by the seller or transferor at the time ofsale. (3) OWNER(S) SIGNATURE Signature of Grantor or Grantor's Agent WAC No. (Section/Subsection)wAc 458-61A-205 Reason for exemption Transfersfroma gou".ffi Type of Docum.nt Bill of Sale Date of Document Gross Selling Price tPersonal Property (deduct) Exemption Claimed (deduct) Taxable Selling Price 0.00 0.00 State Local 0.00 0.00 *Delinquent Interest: State YES NOtratra trE t Local *Delinquent Penalty 0.00 5.00 0.00 10.00 Signature of Grontee or Grantee's Agent _ t Subtotal $ * State Technology +Affi davit Processing Fee Total Due $ PRINT NAME A MINIMUM OF $TO.OO IS DUE IN FEE(S) AND/OR TAX *SEE INSTRUCTIONS I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY oF PERJURY TIIAT THE FoREGoING Is TRUE AND coRREcT Fee $ Name (print) Name (pring Joseph Velling Date & city ofsigning:Seotember Kent, WA Date & city ofsigning:SeDtember .2019:Bellewe, WA d )2 rd vaiting eaares 220 Fourth Avenue South Cilv nf l(pnlName Phone No. (including aea Citylstatelzip Kent. Washinqton 98032 E*E,z5<6& Name Sorthworlh Prooerties I I C Phone No. (including area ^^i-\ larsl 747-4975 City/State/zip a Washinoion limited liabilitv RelleMre \ /eshindldn Mailing 4056 134th Avenue SE Send all property td corespondence to: @ Same r Buyer/Crantee Phone No. (including ilea code)_ Nme Mailing Address City/Statelzip List all real md personal property tu pscel accout numbers check box if perconal property r-'l982570-0285-05 List usessed value(s) $730,700.00 0.0050 Perjury:Pe{ury is a class C felony which is punishable by imprisoment in the state conectional institution for a maximun term ofnot more than five years, or by a fine in an amounf fixgl tp the mDrt of not hore than five thousmd dollars rs5 orbv both imDrisment md fine (RCW 9A..20.020 (lC)) REV 84 0001a (09/14116)THIS SPACE - TREASURER'S USE ONLY DEPT. OF REVENUE Exhibit B 8.D.a Packet Pg. 239 At t a c h m e n t : B i l l o f S a l e - K e n t t o S o u t h w o r t h P r o p e r t i e s ( 1 9 9 9 : B i l l o f S a l e t o C l e a r T i t l e a t 3 0 3 W e s t M e e k e r S t r e e t - A u t h o r i z e ) INSTRUCTIONS Note: To report a transfer ofa controlling interest in real property, please use the Real Estate Excise Tax Affidavit Controlling lnterest Transfer Retum, Revenue Fom No. 84-000 I B. This form is available online at http://dor.wa.gov. Section I Enter the name(s) ofseller/grantor. This is the person(s) conveying interest in the property. Ifsale is less than 100%, check the box "Check if partial sale" and fill in the percentage sold. Section 2: Enter the name(s) ofbuver/erantee. This is the oerson(s) receivins interest in the propefi. List the percentase acquired after each name. Section 3: . Enter the name and address where you would like all future property tax information sent. ' Enter the tax parcel number and current assessed value for real and personal property being conveyed. Check the box to indicate personal property. Section 4: . Enter the street address of the property. . Enter the Enter city name if located within a municipality. . Enter the Section 5: . Enter the appropriate land use code for the property. Please list all codes that apply on the lines provided in section 5. See WAC 458-53-030 (5) for a complete list. . 09 - Lmd with mobile home . l0 - Lmd with new building . ll - Household, single family units . 12 - Multiple fmily rcsidence (2-4 Units) . 13 - Multiple family residence (5 + Units) . 14 - Residential condominiums . l5 - Mobile home pdks or courts . 16-Hotels/motels . 17 - Institutional Lodging (convalescent homes, nureing homes, etc.) . l8 - All other residential not coded . 19 - Vacation md cabin . 2l - Food and kindred products . 22 - Textile mill products . 23 - Appsel md other finished products made from fabrics, leather, md similr materials r 24 -Lumbermdwoodproducts (except fmilue) . 25 - Fumiture ild fixtures . 26 - Paper and allied products . 27 - Printing md publishing . 28 - Chemicals t 29 -Petroleumrefining mdrelated industries . 30 - Rubber and miscellaeous plotic products . 3l - Leather and leather products . 32 - Stone, clay andglas products . 33 - Primary metal industries . 'll . 34 - Fabricated metal products . 74 . 35 - Professional scientific and controlling instrumenis; photographic md optical . 75 goods; watches/clocks manulacturing . g0 . 39 - Miscellueous mmufacturing . 8l. 50 - Condominiums-other thu residential . 33. 53 - Retail Trade - general merchmdise . 86. 54 - Retail Trade - food . 58 - Retail trade - eating & drinking . 88 (restaurants, bds) r 9l. 59 - Tenmt occupied, commercial properties . 94 Cultural activitieVnature exhibitions Recreational activities (golf courses, etc.) Resorts md group cmps Water or mineral right Agriculture (not in cunent use) Agriculture cunent se RCW 84.34 Stilding Timber (separate from land) Forest lmd designated RCW 84.33 Undeveloped Land (land only) Open spac€ lild RCW 84.34. il-Repairservices . 95 - Timberland clasified RCW 84.34. 65 - Prcfwional rrvi6 (medical, dental, etc ) . 96 - Improvemens on leued lmd Section 6: Indicate whether the property is designated as forest land per chapter 84.33 RCW, classified as current use (open space, fam, agricultural, or timber) per chapter 84.34 RCW, or receiving special valuation as historic property per chapter 84.26 RCW. Section 7: List personal property included in the selling price ofthe real property. For example, include tangible (fumiture, equipment, etc) and intangible (goodwill, agreement not to compete, etc). Use Tax is due on personal property purchased without payment ofthe sales tax. Use Tax may be reported on your Combined Excise Tax Retum or a Consumer Use Tax Retum, both available at hftp://dor.wa.gov. If you are claiming a tax exemption, cite the specific Washington Administrative Code (WAC) number, section and subsection and provide a briefexplanation. Most tax exemptions require specific documentation. Refer to the appropriate WAC to determine documentation requirements. Chapter458-6lA WAC is available online at http://dor.wa.gov. Enter the type of document (quit claim deed, statutory warranty deed, etc.), and date of document (MM/DD/YYYY) Enter the selling price ofthe property. Selling price: For tax purposes, the selling price is the Fue and fair value ofthe properly conveyed. When property is conveyed in an arm's length transaction between uffelated persons for valuable consideration, there is a presumption that the selling price is equal to the total consideration paid or contracted to be paid, including any indebtedness. Refer to RCW 82.45.030 for more information about selling price. Deduct the amount ofpersonal propeny included in the selling price. Deduct the amount of tax exemption claimed per chapter 458-6lA WAC. Due Date, Interest and Penaltiess Tax is due at the time ofsale/transfer. Iftax is not paid within one month ofthe date ofsale/transfer, interest and penalties will apply. The interest rate is variable and determined per RCW 82.32.050. Delinquent penalties are 5% one month after the due date; 10olo two months after the due date; and 200lo three months after the due date. (RCW 32.45.100) State Technolory Fee: A $5.00 Electronic Technology Fee that is due on all transactions. (82.45. I 80) Affidavit Processing Fee: A minimum of$5.00 shall be collected in the form oftax and processing fee. A processing fee is due on all transactions where no tax is due and on all taxable transactions where the tax due is less than $5.00. (RCW 82.45. I 80) Section 8: Both grantor (seller) and grantee (buyer), or the agent ofeach, must sign this form, certit,ing that all the information provided is correct. Note: Original signatures required on the "County Treasurer" copy. Signatures may be required on the "Assessors" copy. Check with your county. Audit: Information you provide on this form is subject to audit by the Department ofRevenue. Underpayments oftax will result in the issuance of4 tax assessment with interest and penalties. Note: in the event ofan audit, it is the taxpayers' responsibility to provide documentation to support the selling price or any exemption claimed. This documentation must be maintained for a minimum of four years from date of sale. (RCW 82.4s.r00) Ruling requests: You may request a ruling on the taxability ofthe property transfer. Go to our wsbsite at dor.wa.gov/rulings or fax yow request to (360) 705-6655. Where to send completed forms: Completed forms must be submifted to the County Treasurer's or Recorder's Office where the property is located. For tu ssistmce, contact you local County Trerourer/Recorder or visit http://dor.wa.gov or call (360) 534-1 503. To request this document in m altemate formt, plece call l-800-647-7706. Teletyp (TTY) users may u€ the Wuhington Relay Seruice by calling 7l L REV 84 0001a inst. (09/14/16) Exhibit B 8.D.a Packet Pg. 240 At t a c h m e n t : B i l l o f S a l e - K e n t t o S o u t h w o r t h P r o p e r t i e s ( 1 9 9 9 : B i l l o f S a l e t o C l e a r T i t l e a t 3 0 3 W e s t M e e k e r S t r e e t - A u t h o r i z e ) DATE: October 15, 2019 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: 2019 Court Commissioner - Temporary Limited Term Position MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to establish a temporary limited term position of Court Commissioner, to be funded out of the Municipal Court budget, with an end date of December 31, 2019. SUMMARY: The Municipal Court has the authority to hire a Court Commissioner to serve in the Kent Municipal Court. The Court would like to hire Anthony Gipe as a Court Commissioner to assist with the transitioning to the new judge in January 2020. The Court believes that the Commissioner will work between 30-40 hours a week and would like to offer benefits to the Commissioner during this period. Thus, the Court requests that a Term-Limited position be created with an end date of December 31, 2019. BUDGET IMPACT: Minimal impact to the Municipal Courts general fund. The money for the position has already been allocated; this request is only for the benefits for the individual. SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Innovative Government 10/08/19 Committee of the Whole RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS Next: 10/15/2019 7:00 PM 8.E Packet Pg. 241 DATE: October 15, 2019 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Interlocal Agreement with WSDOT for SR 509 Gateway Project - Authorize MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to sign an interlocal agreement (GCB 3093) with the Washington State Department of Transportation to provide $2 million in funding identified in the Puget Sound Gateway Program SR167 and SR509 Completion Projects, Local Funding and Phasing Memorandum of Understanding, subject to the terms and conditions acceptable to the Public Works Director and the City Attorney. SUMMARY: The 2015 Washington State Legislature required $130 Million in local contributions be provided by local agencies when the Puget Sound Gateway Program was funded through the Connecting Washington Transportation package. The $1.8 Billion Puget Sound Gateway Program includes the SR509 and SR167 extension projects. In 2018, the Mayor and staff participated in multiple meetings with WSDOT and the other local agencies in the development of the draft Puget Sound Gateway Local Funding and Phasing Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). This MOU identifies the framework of the $130 Million in local contributions to be provided for the project. The MOU identified the need for an inter-local agreement between WSDOT and local municipalities to formalize specifics of funding contributions with each jurisdiction. The MOU which identified a $2 Million contribution by the City of Kent was approved by the Kent City Council on June 18, 2018. Key points in the agreement: 1) Formalizes Kent’s $2 Million contribution 2) Identifies payment scheduled: a. $1 million within Stage 1B once the substructure for the I-5 crossing over Veterans Drive is complete, but no sooner than January 2, 2025. b. $1 million due within Stage 2 when pavement for southbound I-5 auxiliary lane from Kent Des Moines Road to S. 272nd Street is installed. 3) City assigns the $4 Million PSRC grant to WSDOT for completion of the Veterans Drive portion of Stage 1B. 8.F Packet Pg. 242 4) WSDOT will complete all administration necessary to meet grant obligations. BUDGET IMPACT: Expenditures are not a part of the current budget. The agreement provides approximately 5 years of planning to budget for the expenditures. SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Evolving Infrastructure, Innovative Government, Sustainable Services ATTACHMENTS: 1. SR 509 Exhibit ILA WSDOT SR 509 Gateway (PDF) 10/08/19 Committee of the Whole RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS Next: 10/15/2019 7:00 PM 8.F Packet Pg. 243 B. c. ccB 3093 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN WSDOT / City of Kent This INTERLOCALAGREEMENT (Agreement) is entered into between the Washington State Department of Transportation WSDOT) and the City of Kent (City), individually referred to as the "Party" and collectively referred to as the "Parties." RECITALS A.Pursuant to Chapter 39.34 Revised Code of Washington (RCW), lnterlocal Cooperation Act, the Parties desire to enter into an agreement with one another in order to jointly establish a mutual and cooperative system to carry out their respective obligations of this Agreement for the construction of the Puget Sound Gateway Program (PROGRAM). One component of the PROGRAM is the State Route (SR) 509 Completion Project (PROJECT). ln 2015, the Washington State Legislature funded the construction of the PROGRAM through the Connecting Washington revenue package, including the Puget Sound Gateway Program. The Puget Sound Gateway Program includes two projects: the SR 167 Completion Project and the SR 509 Completion Project. The Legislature directed that $130 million of the $1 .875 billion PROGRAM funding must come through local funding sources. The City entered into a Local Funding and Phasing Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with WSDOT (Attachment A), which commenced on July 1,2018. This MOU acknowledges that the City is one of eighteen (18) Local Agency Partners committed to provide matching fundsicontributions commensurate with the local benefits expected to be accrued from the PROJECT. The MOU was signed by the WSDOT Secretary of Transportation and 18 local agencies in King and Pierce Counties identifying a grant focused strategy to fund smaller local nexus projects. A local nexus project in Kent is the extension of Veterans Drive west of Military Road under l-5 connecting to the future SR 509 and improving the Kent Des Moines Road interchange The City, in support of the PROGRAM, including the PROJECT, is willing to contribute matching funds towards the required local contribution in the amount of $2 million. ln an effort to help meet the local funding obligation, in 2018, the City applied for and received a $4 million dollar Puget Sound Regional Council grant for the Veteran's Drive Extension, all of which will be applied to the $130 million required to come through local funding sources. The $2 million dollar local contribution to be provided by the City will be used to equally support Stage 1b ($t million dollars) and Stage 2 ($1 million dollars) of the PROJECT, including the Veteran's Drive Extension. NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to Chapter 39.34 RCW, the above recitals that are incorporated herein as if fully set forth below, and in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants, and performances contained herein, and Attachments A and B incorporated and made a part hereof, the Parties agree as follows: D E F GCB 3093 Page I of5 8.F.a Packet Pg. 244 At t a c h m e n t : S R 5 0 9 E x h i b i t I L A W S D O T S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y ( 2 0 0 5 : I n t e r l o c a l A g r e e m e n t w i t h W S D O T f o r S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y P r o j e c t - A u t h o r i z e ) 2 1. General 1.1 This Agreement quantifies the City's required local contribution to be applied specifically towards the PROJECT and defines the roles and responsibilities between the Parties for delivery of the PROJECT. 12 The PROJECT is described as Stage 1b, which includes reconstructing the SR 516 interchange, constructing a northbound auxiliary lane, constructing a southbound auxiliary lane from the S. 200th Street lnterchange ramp to a new southbound collector-distributor (CD) road along lnterstate l-5 and constructing the southbound braided ramps. The PROJECï will also construct the SR 509 mainline from l-5 to the 2Sthlz4thAvenue S. interchange, including the ramps to and from 28thl24tn Avenue S to the south. Stage 1b will also include reconstruction of the 216th Street bridge, construction of one toll point, and restoration of S. 208th Street's connection to SR 99. Stage 2 of the PROJECT includes a southbound auxiliary lane on l-5 from Kent Des Moines Road to S. 272nd Street. 3. 1.3 ïhis Agreement is effective upon the last date of execution of both Parties and will terminate when the soúthbound l-5 auxiliary lane from Kent Des Moines Road to S. 272nd Street, identified in Stage 2, is constructed and reaches final completion, unless the Agreement is mutually extended by the Parties. WSDOT Responsi bil ities 2.1 WSDOT shall design and construct the PROJECT to be consistent with the Proposed Design Alternative (Attachment B) for Stage 1b and Stage 2 respectively. 2.2 WSDOT shall provide the City with a written notice of commencement of the PROJECT'S construction at least thirty (30) days prior to the start óf construction (commencement date). 2.3 WSDOT shall coordinate and seek concurrence from the City on any significant deviations from the Proposed Design Alternative within the City contemplated during implementation of the PROJECT. 2.4 The City agrees to assign the PSRC Grant to WSDOT for the completion of the Veterans Drive portion of the project within Stage 18. As such, WSDOT agrees to complete all grant administration necessary to meet grant obligations. WSDOT agrees to use the PSRC Grant funds for construction only. Payment 3.1 The City agrees to pay a local contribution to the PROJECT in the amount of $2 million dollars to WSDOT for the construction costs associated with the PROJECT, split evenly between Stage 1b and Stage 2. GCB 3093 Page 2 of 5 8.F.a Packet Pg. 245 At t a c h m e n t : S R 5 0 9 E x h i b i t I L A W S D O T S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y ( 2 0 0 5 : I n t e r l o c a l A g r e e m e n t w i t h W S D O T f o r S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y P r o j e c t - A u t h o r i z e ) 3.2 WSDOT will invoice the City in two (2) payments of $1 million dollars (for a total of $2 million dollars). WSDOT shall submit invoices to the City as follows: WSDOT will submit the first invoice during the SR 509 Stage 1b construction period, but no sooner than January 2,2025, provided that the substructure for the l-5 crossing over Veterans Drive is complete. lf the substructure is not complete by January 2,2025, WSDOT will submit the invoice 30 days after its completion. a WSDOT will submit the second invoice during the SR 509 Stage 2 construction period, following the completion of the southbound l-5 auxiliary lane pavement from Kent Des Moines Road to S.272nd Street. The City shall pay the invoice within thirty (30) days of receipt 4. Contract Administration 4.1 The Parties do not by this Agreement create any separate legal or administrative entity. The Secretary of Transportation or his designee and the City of Kent designee as noted in Section I of this Agreement shall be responsible for working with each other to administer the terms of this Agreement. The Parties do not intend to jointly own any real or personal property as part of this undertaking. The Parties will cooperatively work together to further the intent and purpose of this Agreement. 5. Dispute Resolution 5.1 ln the event that a dispute arises between the CITY and WSDOT at any time during the co.urse of the PROJECT, the Parties agree to negotiate at the Project Manager level to resolve any issues. Should such negotiations fail to produce a satisfactory resolution, the Padies agree to elevate negotiation to the senior management level before proceeding to other legal remedies. 6. lndemnification 6.1 To the extent permitted by law, WSDOT and the City shall protect, defend, indemnify, and save harmless each othe¡ their respective officers, officials, employees, and agents, while acting within the scope of their employment as such, from any and all costs, claims, judgment, and/or awards of damages, arising out of, or in any way resulting from, lndemnifying Party's negligent acts or omissions. Neither WSDOT nor the City will be required to indemnify, defend, or save harmless each other if the claim, suit, or action for injuries, death, or damages is caused by the sole negligence of the other party. Where such claims, suits, or actions result from concurrent negligence of WSDOT and the City, the indemnity provisions provided herein shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of WSDOT's or the City's own negligence. WSDOT and the City agree that their respective obligations under this subsection extend to any claim, demand, and/or cause of action brought by, or on behalf of, any of its employees or agents. For this purpose, WSDOT and the City, by mutual negotiation, hereby waive, with respect to the other party only, any immunity that would otheruvise be available against such claims under the industrial insurance provisions of Title 51 Page 3 of 5 a GCB 3093 8.F.a Packet Pg. 246 At t a c h m e n t : S R 5 0 9 E x h i b i t I L A W S D O T S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y ( 2 0 0 5 : I n t e r l o c a l A g r e e m e n t w i t h W S D O T f o r S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y P r o j e c t - A u t h o r i z e ) 7. Venue 71 RCW. ln the event that WSDOT or the City incurs any judgment, award, and/or cost arising therefrom, including attorneys' fees, to enforce the provisions of this section, all such fees, expenses, and costs shall be recoverable by the prevailing party. This indemnification shall survive the termination of this Agreement. ln the event that either Party deems it necessary to institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any right or obligation under this Agreement, the Parties agree that any such action or proceedings shall be brought in King County Superior Court. Further, the Parties agree that each will be solely responsible for payment of their own attorneys' fees, witness fees, and costs. 8. Contacts and Notices 8.1 Contact between the Parties, including but not limited to invoicing, agreement administration, and notices will be directed to the below identified contacts as follows or his/her designee or such other addresses as either Party may, from time to time, designate in writing: City Proiect Manaser shall be: Timothy J. LaPorte, PE Public Works Director 400 West Gowe Kent, WA 98032 (253) 856-6500 Email. tlaporte@kent.wa.qov WSDOT Proiect Manaser shall be: Susan Everett, PE 999 3RD Ave Ste 2200 Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 805-5422 Email. EverettS@wsdot.wa. qov 9. Amendment 9.1 This Agreement may be amended or modified only by the mutual agreement of the Parties. Such amendments or modifications shall not be binding unless they are in writing and signed by persons authorized to bind each of the Parties. 10. Entire Agreement 10.1 This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding and agreement between the parties as to the subject matter herein and no other agreements or understandings, written or otherwise, shall be binding upon the padies upon execution of this Agreement. 11. Severability 11.1 Should any clause, phrase, sentence or paragraph of this Agreement or its application be declared invalid or void by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement or its applications of those provisions not so declared shall remain in full force and effect. GCB 3093 Page 4 of 5 8.F.a Packet Pg. 247 At t a c h m e n t : S R 5 0 9 E x h i b i t I L A W S D O T S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y ( 2 0 0 5 : I n t e r l o c a l A g r e e m e n t w i t h W S D O T f o r S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y P r o j e c t - A u t h o r i z e ) 12. 13. No Thi rd-Party Beneficiaries 12.1 This Agreement is executed for the sole and exclusive benefit of the signatory Parties. Nothing in this Agreement, whether expressed or implied, is intended to confer any right, remedy or other entitlement upon any person other than the Parties hereto, nor is anything in this Agreement intended to relieve or discharge the obligation or liability of any third-party, nor shall any provision herein give any third-party any right of action against any party hereto. Audits/Records 13.1 All records for the PROJECT in support of all costs incurred shall be maintained by WSDOT for a period of three (3) years after acceptance as defined in WSDOT's Construction Manual M 41-01.32, Chapter 10. The City shall have full access to and right to examine said records, during normal business hours and as often as it deems necessary. Should the City require copies of any records, it agrees to pay the costs thereof. The Parties agree that the work performed herein is subject to audit by either or both Parties and/or their designated representatives, and/or the federal/state government. ln Witness Whereof, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date last written below. City of Kent Washington State , Department of Transportation By By Printed Printed Title Title Date:Date Approved as to Form City of Kent on as to Form By By Printed erifed:(L. Scott Lockwood Title Title: Assistant Attorney General Date:Date Zrlf GCB 3093 Page 5 of 5 8.F.a Packet Pg. 248 At t a c h m e n t : S R 5 0 9 E x h i b i t I L A W S D O T S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y ( 2 0 0 5 : I n t e r l o c a l A g r e e m e n t w i t h W S D O T f o r S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y P r o j e c t - A u t h o r i z e ) ATTACHMENT A We¡hhUton Statc Dcpertmant of llanrportatlon Transportation Bullding 310 Maple Park Avenue S.E. P.O. Box 47300 Olympia, WA 98504-7300 360-705-7000 TTY: 1-8@-833-6388 www.wsdot.wa.gov June 28,2018 The Honorable Steve Hobbs Chair Senate Transportation Committee P.O. Box 40444 Olympia, WA 98504-0444 The Honorable Curtis King Ranking Member Senate Transportation Committee P.O. Box 40414 Olympia, WA 98504-0414 The Honorable Judy Clibborn Chair House Transportation Committee P.O. Box 40600 Olympia, WA 98504-0600 The Honorable Mark Harmsworth Ranking Member House Transportation Committee P.O. Box 40600 Olympia, WA 98504-0600 ln the 2017 Legislative session, Engrossed Senate Bill 5096 Section 306(20Xb) directed WSDOT to develop a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to fund the $130 million from local agency partners for the Puget Sound Gateway Program included in the 2015 Connecting Washington transportation revenue package. Engrossed Senate Bill 5096 stated that: The secretary of transportation must develop a memorendum of understanding with local project støkeholders that identifies a scheduleþr stakeholders to provide local matchingfundsfor the Puget Sound Gateway project. Criteriafor eligibility of local match includes matchingfunds and equivalent in-kind contributions including, but not limited to, land donations. The memorandum of understanding must befinalized by July I, 2018. The depørtment must submit a copy of the memorandum of understanding to the trqnsportation committees of the legislature and report regulørly on the status. In October 2017, WSDOT began a stakeholder process to help establish the local contributions necessary to achieve the $130 million in local funding. The resulting Funding and Phasing Subcommittee, made up of l8 affected jurisdictions, has met five times. From this group, a grant-focused strategy emerged as the most feasible way to fund the $130 million. A key element of the grant-focused strategy was to identify smaller project elements within the Gateway Program that provide clear and measurable benefits to local jurisdictions, called "Local Nexus Projects." The Funding and Phasing Subcommittee met regularly to establish a process for determining benefits derived from the Local Nexus Projects, align on contributions, and develop the MOU. GCB 3093 Page I of 12 8.F.a Packet Pg. 249 At t a c h m e n t : S R 5 0 9 E x h i b i t I L A W S D O T S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y ( 2 0 0 5 : I n t e r l o c a l A g r e e m e n t w i t h W S D O T f o r S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y P r o j e c t - A u t h o r i z e ) Puget Sound Gateway Program Memorandum of Understanding June 28,2018 Page2 All l8 jurisdictions have endorsed and signed the attached Local Funding MOU Additionally, WSDOT and our local agency partners have already submitted four grant applications this spring for the Local Nexus Projects. We submitted three applications with the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) and one with the Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board (FMSIB). We received the FMSIB grant and two PSRC grants, totaling $13 million, which combined with local match funding, brings the local contribution amount to over $26 million for this initial grant cycle. If you have any questions or would like to meet for an update on the Puget Sound Gatewa)¡ Program, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, 1 ,-) /'7rh.-)¿*-"&¿'/ ,, Roger Millar, PE, FASCE, FAICP Secretary of Transportation GCB 3093 Page 2 of 12 8.F.a Packet Pg. 250 At t a c h m e n t : S R 5 0 9 E x h i b i t I L A W S D O T S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y ( 2 0 0 5 : I n t e r l o c a l A g r e e m e n t w i t h W S D O T f o r S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y P r o j e c t - A u t h o r i z e ) Puget Sound Gateway Program SR 167 and SR 509 Completion Projects Local Funding and Phasing Memorandum of Understanding 1. ParticipatingParties ln addition to the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), the following Local Agency Partners constitute those parties currently participating in this Memorandum of Understanding pertaining to the local contribution requirement for the Puget Sound Gateway Program (Gateway Program) : o Port of Seattle o Port of Tacoma . King County o Pierce County . City of Algona . City of Auburn . City of Burien . City of Des Moines . City of Edgewood . City of Federal Way . City of Fife . City of Kent City of Milton City of Pacific City of Puyallup City of SeaTac City of Sumner City of Tacoma a a a 2. Background and Purpose of MOU ln tuly 2015, the Washington State Legislature and Governor lnslee acted to fund the Gateway Program through the Connecting Washington revenue package. The Gateway Program is comprised of two projects: the State Route 167 Completion Project and the State Route 509 Completion Project. These projects provide essential connections to the ports of Tacoma and Seattle and will help ensure that people and goods move more reliably through the Puget Sound region. WSDOT is the lead project sponsor and is responsible for the planning, design and construction of the Gateway Program, as well as for its overall financial management, The program has been guided from its beginning by a Joint SR 167/5R 509 Executive Committee (Executive Committee), comprised of elected and appointed representatives of localjurisdictions served by the Gateway Program (Algona, Auburn, Burien, Des Moines, Edgewood, Federal Way, Fife, Kent, Milton, Pacific, Puyallup, SeaTac, Sumner, Tacoma, King County, Pierce County, Port of Seattle, and Port of Tacoma) as well as Federal Highway Administration, Washington State Transportation Commission, Washington State Department of Transportation, Puget Sound Regional Council, Sound Transit, Pierce Transit, and the Freight Mobility Strategic lnvestment Board. Funding for the Gateway Program has been approved to come from the state gas tax, tolls, local contributions, and potential federal and state grants. Total funding for the Gateway Program, from the 2015 Connecting Washington transportation funding package, is S1.875 billion, which includes local contributions of S130 million. The program has been funded over a 16-year RATIFICATION FINAL Funding and Phasing MOU GCB 3093 6/28/2018t Page 3 of 1"2 8.F.a Packet Pg. 251 At t a c h m e n t : S R 5 0 9 E x h i b i t I L A W S D O T S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y ( 2 0 0 5 : I n t e r l o c a l A g r e e m e n t w i t h W S D O T f o r S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y P r o j e c t - A u t h o r i z e ) timeline. Based on the legislative funding plan, major construction for a first stage would occur from 2019 through 2025, and a second stage from 2026 through 2030. Local contributions will be needed to construct both stage one and stage two projects. ln the 2017 Legislative session new language was enacted (Engrossed Senate Bill 5096 S 306(20Xb)) requiring development of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Local Agency Partners and WSDOT. The legislature directed that: The secretory of transportot¡on must develop a memorondum of understanding with locol project stokeholders that identifies o schedule for stakeholders to provide locol motching funds for the Puget Sound Goteway project. Criteria for eligibility of locol match includes motching funds and equivalent in-kind contributions including, but not limited to, Iand donotions. The memorandum of understanding must be finolized by July 7, 2078. The deportment must submit a copy of the memorandum of understanding to the transportot¡on committees of the legisloture and report regulorly on the støtus. To this end, the Executive Committee of the Gateway Program convened a Funding and Phasing Subcommittee (Subcommittee) to develop a MOU that summarizes their planned future commitments and planned timing of those commitments to contribute to the SR 167 and SR 509 projects. The Subcommittee goals include: . Support efforts to build the Gateway projects on or ahead of schedule r Create successful local partnerships o Obtain sufficient local funding to build the Puget Sound Gateway projects ¡ Time grant-funding projects to support the project delivery schedule The construct of local funding participation, when authorized by the legislative bodies of the relevant agencies through a series of forthcoming interlocal agreements, is based on the following projections: sR 167 sR 509 TOTAT Port contributions S3o m¡ll¡on Sgo m¡ll¡on $eo m¡ll¡on Federal INFRA srant Sto m¡ll¡on Sto mill¡on S20 m¡ll¡on Local agency partner match Sto m¡ll¡on Sto m¡ll¡on $zo m¡ll¡on Other Grants (PSRC, FMS¡8, TIBI S20 m¡llion $to mill¡on $¡o m¡ll¡on Total Szo m¡ll¡on $eo m¡ll¡on $tgo m¡ll¡on 3. Local Funding Strategy A key element of the local funding strategy is to identify projects within the Gateway Program that provide clear and measurable benefits to localjurisdictions. ln the Gateway Program, these are called "Local Nexus Projects," are designed to: RATIFICATION FINAL Funding and Phasing MOU GCB 3093 2 6/28/20L8 Page 4 of 12 8.F.a Packet Pg. 252 At t a c h m e n t : S R 5 0 9 E x h i b i t I L A W S D O T S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y ( 2 0 0 5 : I n t e r l o c a l A g r e e m e n t w i t h W S D O T f o r S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y P r o j e c t - A u t h o r i z e ) Create a positive business case for Local Agency Partners byfocusing on the parts ofthe program that are most relevant and important to localjurisdictions Leverage the potentialto access significant grant funding to support localfunding assumptions ln support of the local funding strategy, Local Agency Partners shall: Participate, co-fund match, and submit grant applications with support from Subcommittee staff, as identified in Section 6 of th¡s MOU Combine local monetary and in-kind contributions and project funds to ensure fully- funded applications, as identified in Section 6 of this MOU Support the grant effort and avoid competition with the local projects in the year of application The following Local Nexus Projects have been identified within the north (SR 509) and south (SR 167) segments of the Gateway Program: lf Local Nexus, INFRA, and any other pending grant projects become fully funded, these projects will contribute substantially toward the Legislative requirement for local match. Funding commitments will be achieved via an interlocal agreement from each signing party up to the amounts presented in this MOU. Local Agency Partner signatories to this MOU understand that once the local contribution requirements set forth in ESB 5096 (S130 m¡llion) is achieved, that Local Agency Partners will not be required to commit to additional funds beyond what is outlined in this MOU. lf additional grant funding or additional funds from other sources are obtained that fulfill the S1"30 million local contribution requirement, the Secretary of Transportation and the Executive Committee will review and determine to either reduce local agency partner match payments, or recommend expanding scope of the Gateway Program, and amend each signing party's interlocal agreement accordingly. 4. Local Participat¡on Policy The Joint Executive Committee has agreed to a funding and phasing policy that structures local agency partner match requirements to be commensurate with the benefits accrued from the project at a local level. This policy states that: a a a o a RATIFICATION FINAL Funding and Phasing MOU GCB 3093 3 6/28/2018 Page 5 of L2 Gatewav North (SR 509)Gateway South (SR 167) L88th South Ramps Meridian West Ramps SeaTac Access, with Ramps lo 28th/24rh Avenue South 54th Avenue East Ramps Veterans Drive Extension lnterurban Trail Lake to Sound Trail Valley Avenue West Ramps Port of Tacoma Access/SR 509 Spur TOth Avenue E Bridee Relocation 8.F.a Packet Pg. 253 At t a c h m e n t : S R 5 0 9 E x h i b i t I L A W S D O T S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y ( 2 0 0 5 : I n t e r l o c a l A g r e e m e n t w i t h W S D O T f o r S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y P r o j e c t - A u t h o r i z e ) All local ogency pdrtners occrue some benefit from the Puget Sound Gatewoy Program. Partners receiving fewer benefits, however, ore not expected to contribute os much os partners who receive more benefits. Direct benefits are those that ore most quontifioble, but there ore other components of value thot include indirect, strategic ond policy/social benefits. Both direct ond indirect benefits will be ossessed os port of the considerotion of local contributions, because they ore more easily quantifiable thon stotegic and po I icy/soci a I be nef its. All Local Agency Partner signatories of this MOU expect to seek approval of interlocal agreements to contribute a match to be applied to Local Nexus Projects at a levelthat reflects their respective anticipated level of benefit, as identified in Section 6 of this MOU. 5. Benefit Assessment Methodology The proposed financial participation by each partner is based on a general, qualitative assessment of the net benefits expected to be received by full completion of the Gateway Program. The assessment includes the following metrics, based on available project data and transportation modeling outputs: Direct transportat¡on linkages. The location of direct access points for new limited access highways or other transportation infrastructure that benefits the community. Effects on local sales taxes. The impacts of the projects to sales tax receipts, both in terms of one-time construction sales taxes for the project, and ongoing sales taxes from impacts to commercial uses. Travel time savings. Overall travel time savings for local car and truck traffic associated with the projects. Traffic diversion from local streets. The diversion of, or increase in, traffic on local arterials due to the project, with associated positive impacts to traffic safety and local road maintenance. Effects on local employment. The potential effects of improved accessibility are reviewed, particularly in the context of access to new or potential employment uses. Effects on developable residential lands. The potential impacts of changes in traffic flow and accessibility on residential land development, with a focus on areas within the jurisdiction that are available for redevelopment. Effects on developable employment lands. The potential impacts of changes in traffic flow and accessibility on the development or redevelopment of commercial and industrial lands. Achievement of local policy goals. The alignment of the WSDOT Gateway Program with local plans and policies. Environmental and social benefits. Environmental and social benefits specifically linked to these projects, including upgrades to pedestrian and cycling infrastructure, and wetlands and riparian restoration. The approach and findings of the benefits assessments have been provided to the Local Agency Partners. a a a a a a a a a RATIFICATION FINAL Funding and Phasing MOU GCB 3093 4 6/28/2018 Page 6 of 12 8.F.a Packet Pg. 254 At t a c h m e n t : S R 5 0 9 E x h i b i t I L A W S D O T S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y ( 2 0 0 5 : I n t e r l o c a l A g r e e m e n t w i t h W S D O T f o r S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y P r o j e c t - A u t h o r i z e ) 6. Local Jurisdiction Anticipated Contributions to the Program Based on results from the benefit assessment described in Section 5, contributions for each of the LocalAgency Partners were determined by project stage in the tables below. Following execution of this MOU, interlocal agreements will be drafted for subsequent approval. Anticipated contributions only become binding commitments when embedded in interlocal agreements, and the conditions therein are approved by the proposed funding entity. lnterlocal agreements between WSDOT and the respective Local Agency Partner must be in place for a project prior to issuance of the Request for Proposals (RFP) for any proposed construction contract. The interlocal agreements will become binding commitments, within the statutory authority of the Local Agency Partner, and will define the schedule of local match payments expected over the duration of each construction project stage. WSDOT will exercise due diligence to develop and construct each project on schedule within the Gateway Program to the best of its abilities. Local Agency Partners will participate in project development reviews and project meetings in support of the Gateway Program. lf grant pursuits identified in the Stage 1 and Stage 2 tables below are not achieved sufficient to meet the 5130 million local contribution, additional grants will be pursued from the funding programs listed or from other funding programs that may become available over the life of the Gateway Program. lf Local Nexus Projects go to construction without planned grants, the Local Agency Partner match funds will still be provided by agreement with WSDOT. lf it is determined that a Local Nexus Project cannot be fully funded, WSDOT will review options with the Executive Committee. lf an official decision is determined by the Executive Committee and the Secretary of Transportation that the Local Nexus Project is not to be included in a construction project, the Local Agency Partner match may be withdrawn. Stage 1 Grant Pursuits for Local Nexus Projects Project Estimated Construct¡on Cost Funding Program Grant Target Amount Tartet Due Mo/Year Ant¡c¡pated Construct¡on Expenditure local Agency Partner Match Partner Nexus 70th Avenue E/lnterurban Trail s32,245,600 FMSIB Ss,ooo,ooo Mar 2018 20L9-202L s800,ooo $5oo,ooo s3,000,000 Fife Tacoma Port of Tacoma TIB $5,ooo,ooo Aue 2018 20L9-202L State Capital & Transpor tation Sl,40o,ooo Mar 2018 20L9-2021 Fife Veterans Drive/ SR516 lnterchange s33,goo,ooo PSRC 54,5oo,ooo Apr 2018 2027-202s Sl,ooo,ooo Kent TIB s5,ooo,ooo Aug 2020 202t-202s Sl,ooo,ooo Kent SeaTac Access S176,883,500 PSRC $4,500,000 Apr 2018 202t-202s s2,ooo,ooo S5oo,ooo SeaTac (ROW in lieu) Des Moines RATIFICATION FINAL Funding and Phasing MOU GCB 3093 5 6/28/20L8 PageT of L2 8.F.a Packet Pg. 255 At t a c h m e n t : S R 5 0 9 E x h i b i t I L A W S D O T S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y ( 2 0 0 5 : I n t e r l o c a l A g r e e m e n t w i t h W S D O T f o r S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y P r o j e c t - A u t h o r i z e ) Port of Tacoma Access/509 Spur s323,042,000 PSRC S4,5oo,ooo Apr 2018 202t-202s 51,5oo,ooo s3,000,000 s800,000 Tacoma Port of Tacoma Fife FMSIB Ss,ooo,ooo Mar2O2O 202t-2025 All Gateway Program INFRA s20,000,000*Nov 2017 2019-2021 SR 167 Stage 1 Port of ïacoma Jan202L 202L-2025 se,000,000 Port of Tacoma SR 509 Stage 1 Port of Seattle Jan202L 202L-2025 s1s,000,000 Port of Seattle (expected in 2023-202s1 Total Stage 1 ss4,900,000 s38,100,000 s93,000,000 Stage 2 Future Grant Pursuits for Local Nexus * - lf no INFRA, apply for FHWA BUILD grant for Port of Tacoma Access (SR 509 Spur) TBD - grant funding program pursuit to be determined in future 7. Terms and Termination 7.1. Amendments This MOU shall be periodically reviewed and evaluated regarding the need for modifications or amendments by mutual determination of WSDOT and Local Agency Partners. Amendments to the MOU shall be required if program funding assumptions need to be adjusted that affect the ability to construct the identified Local Nexus Projects or the abil¡ty to achieve the S130 million local contribution. Such amendments shall only be binding if they are in writing and signed by authorized personnel from all of the Local Agency Partners. Except as set forth in an amendment, the MOU will be unaffected and shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. lf there is conflict RATIFICATION FINAL Funding and Phasing MOU GCB 3093 6 6/28/2or8 Page 8 of 12 Project Estimated Construct¡on Cost Funding Program Grant Target Amount Target Due Mo/Year Ant¡c¡pated Construction Expenditure Local Agency Partner Match Partner Nexus Meridian Avenue lnterchange TBD s3,ooo,ooo 2022 2026-2030 $2,000,000 Puyallup Valley Avenue lnterchange TBD s3,000,000 2022 2026-2030 s2,000,000 Pierce County 188th Street lnterchange improvements TBD TBD 2023 2026-2030 TBD SeaTac TBD s4,000,000 2022 2026-2030 S5oo,ooo s500,000 Edgewood (ROW in lieu) Sumner SR 167 Stage 2 Port of Tacoma Jan2026 2026-2030 s15,000,000 Port of Tacoma TBD s4,000,000 2024 2026-2030SR 509 Stage 2 Port of Seattle Jan2026 2026-2030 s1s,000,000 Port of Seattle Total Stace 2 s14,000,000 s35,000,000 s49,000,000 Total Stages 1&2 $73,1oo,ooo S142,ooo,ooos68,900,000 8.F.a Packet Pg. 256 At t a c h m e n t : S R 5 0 9 E x h i b i t I L A W S D O T S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y ( 2 0 0 5 : I n t e r l o c a l A g r e e m e n t w i t h W S D O T f o r S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y P r o j e c t - A u t h o r i z e ) between an amendment and the MOU or any earlier amendment, the terms of the most recent amendment will prevail. lf there is a conflict between subsequent interlocal agreements and the MOU or any earlier amendments, the terms of the interlocal agreements will prevail. Changes that do not affect the ability to construct the identified Local Nexus Project or achieve the 5t30 m¡ll¡on local contribution shall be addressed through the interlocal agreement between WSDOT and the relevant Local Agency Partner. 7.2. Dispute Resolution Should any signatory to this MOU object at any time to any actions proposed or the manner in which the terms of this MOU are implemented, the Executive Committee shall hear the dispute first and if the disputant(s) is/are not satisfied with the Committee's proposed decision, the Committee will send to the Secretary of Transportation its proposed solution and all documentation relevant to the dispute. The Secretary of Transportation shall provide the Executive Committee with his/her advice on how to resolve the dispute within thirty (30) calendar days of receiving adequate documentation. Prior to reaching a final decision on the dispute, the Executive Committee shall prepare a written response that considers any timely advice or comments regarding the dispute from the Secretary of Transportation, signatories and other interested parties, and provide them with a copy of this written response. WSDOT will then proceed according to this final decision. 7.3 Conditions for Terminat¡on of Participation Subject to legislative appropriation and all applicable laws, each signatory shall ensure that the Gateway Program is carried out in accordance with the terms of the MOU and subsequent interlocal agreements. A signatory may terminate its participation in this MOU if its terms cannot be met and by providing written notice to the Secretary of Transportation and the Executive Committee a minimum of 180 calendar days before a project issues an RFP that relies on that local agency partner funding. Prior to providing written notice terminating participation, however, the signatories shall consult with WSDOT to determine whether an amendment to the MOU might be feasible, lf a signatory terminates its participation, WSDOT will then consult with the Executive Committee to determine if project scope elements need to be removed if contributions are not realized in accordance with this understanding. 8. Period of Agreement. This MOU will commence on July L,2Ot8 and will dissolve when the St¡O mill¡on of local contribution have been secured, orwhen the Local Nexus Projects have been constructed and are complete. RATIFICATION FINAL Funding and Phasing MOU GCB 3093 7 6/28/20t8 Page 9 of 12 8.F.a Packet Pg. 257 At t a c h m e n t : S R 5 0 9 E x h i b i t I L A W S D O T S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y ( 2 0 0 5 : I n t e r l o c a l A g r e e m e n t w i t h W S D O T f o r S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y P r o j e c t - A u t h o r i z e ) 9 a Stephen P. Metruck Executive Director Port of Seattle John Wolfe Chief Executive Officer Port of Tacoma 6/2t/t8 Date s/30/t8 Þonr& Date 6122/t8 Dow Constantine County Executive King County Bruce Dammeier County Executive Pierce Cou David E. Hill Mayor City of Algona l4-/ t Date sl3o/78 Date 6/2s/t8 )(*q*Þ"huá Date 6/tt/18 Nancy Backus Mayor City of Auburn \ Brian City Ma City of Burien RATIFICATION FINAL Funding and Phasing MOU GCB 3093 Date 6/L7lL8 Date 8 6/28/2018 Page 10 of 12 8.F.a Packet Pg. 258 At t a c h m e n t : S R 5 0 9 E x h i b i t I L A W S D O T S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y ( 2 0 0 5 : I n t e r l o c a l A g r e e m e n t w i t h W S D O T f o r S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y P r o j e c t - A u t h o r i z e ) 1¿r,á*{'fu 6/261L8 MichaelMatthias City Manager City Date 6/13/L8 of Des Moines DarylEidinger Mayor City of J¡ City of Federal Way Pat Hu Councilmem City of Fife Dana Ralph Mayor City of Kent Shan na Styron-Sherrell Mayor City of Milton Date 6/20lt8 Date 6/20/L8 Date 6/26/78 Date 6l2t/L8 do*,&,^-*, Date 6lzLl78 Leanne Guier Mayor City of Pacific n Yama City Manager City of Puyallup RATIFICATION FINAL Funding and Phasing MOU GCB 3093 {^-) Date 6/12/L8 9 6l28l2Ot8 Page 11 of 12 Date 8.F.a Packet Pg. 259 At t a c h m e n t : S R 5 0 9 E x h i b i t I L A W S D O T S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y ( 2 0 0 5 : I n t e r l o c a l A g r e e m e n t w i t h W S D O T f o r S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y P r o j e c t - A u t h o r i z e ) Èa-øb,*afu 6/28/78 Scorc Manager City of SeaTac William L. Pugh Mayor City of Sumner Date 6/8/t8 {¿n:,CfA Date 6/27/L8 ¡l¡zaUetñ/n. Paut¡ city Manage r Ap¡t:*/ 6',kt"u, City of Tacoma tr"Date 6127lt8 Roger Mil Secretary Transportation Washi ngton State Department of Transportation RATIFICATION FINAL Funding and Phasing MOU GCB 3093 Date 6/2812078 Paget2 of t2 10 8.F.a Packet Pg. 260 At t a c h m e n t : S R 5 0 9 E x h i b i t I L A W S D O T S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y ( 2 0 0 5 : I n t e r l o c a l A g r e e m e n t w i t h W S D O T f o r S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y P r o j e c t - A u t h o r i z e ) SR 509 Completion Project - Stage lb SR 509 GCG 3093 Attachment B Des Moines Future Sound z4thAves. Transit Des Moines Station --+l- (D Burien Des jVones ltle¡noriat Dr s(t, NooJ(n N{N-è a,18th Ave S lØ Stage 2 Des <,,N oo CD N o =@ U) NNo CN Cñ 26t¡Ave S ,-28th Ave S Transit iø Angle Lake Station SeaTac - $l¿gs tþ - - - Sea-Tac Airport access - stage 2 _ Lake to Sound Trail "--- Sound Transit Future Sound Transit S 272nd Station U! Àl =l(d cnÞN a> tages 2 Kent Nlq@ INtoìol=ia Sta 1b SR 509 Stage lb - reconstructs the SR 516 interchange, constructs a northbound auxiliary lane, constructs a southbound auxiliary lane from the S. 200th Street Interchange ramp to a new southbound collector-distributor (CD) road along Interstate I-5 and constructs the southbound braided ramps. Stage 1b also constructs the SR 509 mainline from I-5 to the z9thl24th Avenue S. Interchange, including the ramps to and from 28th/24th Avenue S to the south. Stage lb will also include 216th Street Bridge reconstruction, construction of one toll point, and SR 99/ S. 208th Street connection restoration. N> 30thAve S 8.F.a Packet Pg. 261 At t a c h m e n t : S R 5 0 9 E x h i b i t I L A W S D O T S R 5 0 9 G a t e w a y ( 2 0 0 5 : I n t e r l o c a l A g r e e m e n t w i t h W S D O T f o r S R DATE: October 15, 2019 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Veterans Drive Extension PSRC Grant Acceptance - Authorize MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to sign agreements necessary to accept $4 million of Federal Highway Administration funds for expenditures on the Veterans Drive Extension, a local nexus project within the SR509 Gateway Program, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the Public Works Director and City Attorney. SUMMARY: The 2015 Connecting Washington Transportation package passed by the Washington State Legislature, required $130 Million in local contributions to the Puget Sound Gateway Program. Grant funds obtained by local agencies for local nexus projects are counted towards the $130 Million local contribution. The Puget Sound Gateway Program SR167 and SR509 Local Funding and Phasing Memorandum of Understanding, identifies the local nexus projects including the Veterans Drive Extension project. In 2018, the City was awarded a $4 Million in Federal Highway Administration funds through the Puget Sound Regional Council’s regional competition. The project will be constructed by WSDOT as a part of the SR509 Extension, Stage 1B and is expected to be complete by 2025. SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Evolving Infrastructure, Innovative Government, Sustainable Services ATTACHMENTS: 1. Veterans Drive Exhibit City of Kent 2018 Award Letter (PDF) 10/08/19 Committee of the Whole RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS Next: 10/15/2019 7:00 PM 8.G Packet Pg. 262 8.G.a Packet Pg. 263 At t a c h m e n t : V e t e r a n s D r i v e E x h i b i t C i t y o f K e n t 2 0 1 8 A w a r d L e t t e r ( 2 0 0 4 : V e t e r a n s D r i v e E x t e n s i o n P S R C G r a n t A c c e p t a n c e - A u t h o r i z e ) DATE: October 15, 2019 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: WSDOT Reimbursement Agreement for South 224th - Authorize MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to modify agreement JA 6673 with WSDOT for review, permitting and approval of the South 224th Street Project within WSDOT right-of-way and inspection of materials, to increase costs from $70,000 to $130,000, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the Public Works Director and City Attorney. SUMMARY: The South 224th Street Project includes a new bridge crossing over SR 167 in WSDOT limited access. Agreement JA 6673 is needed to compensate the State for its costs to review plans, permit work and inspect materials used in WSDOT right of way, or as requested by the City. The agreement was executed in 2010 and is expected to run through mid-2020. The modified agreement is necessary due to additional work completed by WSDOT in support of the project. The current authorized agreement with WSDOT is for $70,000. The estimated total agreement is for $130,000. BUDGET IMPACT: Costs are included in the previously approved budget authorized by Council. SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Thriving City, Evolving Infrastructure, Innovative Government, Sustainable Services ATTACHMENTS: 1. JA6673 Supplement Authorization (PDF) 10/08/19 Committee of the Whole RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS RESULT: RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL BY CONSENSUS Next: 10/15/2019 7:00 PM 8.H Packet Pg. 264 09/26/2019 Carla Maloney, P.E. City of Kent Design Engineering / Public Works Department 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 SUBJECT: SR 167 – 224th Crossing Request for Authorization to Amended Project Budget Dear Ms. Maloney: This amendment is in regards to your project account, Number JA6673, established with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to cover our review, inspection, and administrative costs for subject project activity within WSDOT Right of Way. The current amount authorized to cover WSDOT costs through project closure needs increasing from $70k to $130k. This increase is necessary to cover our unbilled and future costs. Our unbilled costs on this project are currently $42,929.09. Unbilled cost represent costs exceeding the current authorized amount of $70k. Any costs above current authorization remains unbilled and continue to accumulate until amended to cover the overage plus future work. By approving and signing this amendment, the City authorizes increasing the authorized amount as noted above. __________________________ ____________________ __________ City Representative Signature Title Date Please contact Duffy McColloch at (206) 440-4713, McCollD@wsdot.wa.gov, if additional information needed. Sincerely, Duffy McColloch WSDOT – NWR Local Agency/Development Services Engineer 8.H.a Packet Pg. 265 At t a c h m e n t : J A 6 6 7 3 S u p p l e m e n t A u t h o r i z a t i o n ( 2 0 0 3 : W S D O T R e i m b u r s e m e n t A g r e e m e n t f o r S o u t h 2 2 4 t h - A u t h o r i z e ) DATE: October 15, 2019 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Lake Meridian Park Boathouse Project – Accept as Complete MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to accept the Lake Meridian Park Bathhouse Repair project as complete and release retainage to A To B Builders LLC, upon receipt of standard releases by the State and the release of any liens. SUMMARY: In December 2018, after a competitive bidding process, the Parks Department contracted with A To B Builders LLC to repair the restroom and bathhouse at Lake Meridian Park after fire damage. The final contract amount including all change orders and tax totaled $684,607.84. SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Evolving Infrastructure, Innovative Government, Sustainable Services ATTACHMENTS: 1. Lake Meridian Bathhouse Repair (PDF) 8.I Packet Pg. 266 grns Bryan Higgins, Parks Capital Project Manager Parks Planning & Development Division Parks, Recreation, & Community Services 220 Fourth Avenue South, Kent, WA 98032 253-8s6-s110 bhiqoins@KentWA.oov PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES Terry Jungman, Parks Planning & Development Manager Parks, Recreation and Community Services 220 4th Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 Fax: 253-856-6050 City of Kent Parks, Recreation & Community Services Julie Parascondola, Director KENT WaSHTNGToN PHONE: 253-856-511O September 24,20t9 Anthony Thompson A To B Builders, LLC 5007 Pacific Hwy E, #15 Fife, WA 98424 RE: Lake Meridian Park Bathhouse Repair, #PPD19-01 Anthony: I made a final inspection of the Lake Meridian Park Bathhouse on 9123/2019 and found that the project is completed to my satisfaction. This letter constitutes Notice of Physical Completion of the Lake Meridian Park Bathhouse Repair Project. After the Kent City Council accepts the project as complete, a Notice of Completion will be filed with the Washington L&I Department. To avoid delays in closing out the project and the release of retained funds, please ensure that all prevailing wage affidavits are filed promptly with Washington L&I. If you have any questions, please call or email. Thank you. Regards, /'r BrySn Hig 8.I.a Packet Pg. 267 At t a c h m e n t : L a k e M e r i d i a n B a t h h o u s e R e p a i r ( 2 0 1 4 : L a k e M e r i d i a n P a r k B o a t h o u s e P r o j e c t – A c c e p t a s C o m p l e t e ) DATE: October 15, 2019 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Accept the 2019 Crack Sealing Project as Complete - Authorize MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to accept the 2019 Crack Sealing Project as complete and release retainage to Huizenga Enterprises, LLC., upon receipt of standard releases from the State and the release of any liens. SUMMARY: This project included the installation of rubberized asphalt for crack sealing roadways on various city streets. The final contract total paid was $145,788.96 which is $22,947.70 under the original contract amount of $168,736.66. BUDGET IMPACT: This project was paid for using Business and Occupation Tax Funds. SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Evolving Infrastructure, Sustainable Services 8.J Packet Pg. 268 DATE: October 15, 2019 TO: Kent City Council SUBJECT: Fuel Tank Replacement Project Bid - Award MOTION: Award the Fuel Tank Replacement Project bid to Granite Petroleum Inc. in the amount of $1,875,887.20, and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary documents, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public Works Director. SUMMARY: City of Kent staff utilizes a diverse array of vehicles and equipment to provide essential services to the community. Approximately 200,000 gallons of unleaded gasoline and 50,000 gallons of diesel are purchased each year to fuel this equipment. In an effort to purchase fuel in the most cost-effective manner, the City utilizes the Washington State Department of Enterprise Services advertised fuel contract. The City’s current fueling island was installed in 1988. It includes two sub-surface 10,000 gallon gasoline tanks and one sub-surface 4,000 gallon diesel tank. The fueling tanks, pumps, and associated equipment are in need of replacement. The replacement fuel island will include above ground fuel tanks, modernized pumps, and a canopy. The bid opening for the Fuel Tank Replacement Project was held on September 24, 2019 with one bid received. The lowest responsible and responsive bid was submitted by Granite Petroleum Inc. in the amount of $1,875,887.20. BUDGET IMPACT: The fuel island project is a budgeted project this is being funded through the Fleet Fund. SUPPORTS STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Sustainable Services ATTACHMENTS: 1. Fuel Tank Replacement Project Bid Tab (PDF) 10.A Packet Pg. 269 Fuel Tank Replacement Project Bid Opening: September 24, 2019, 11:00 AM Granite Petroleum Inc. Engineer's Estimate PO Box 6167 Skillings Connolly, Inc. Spokane, WA 99217 TOTAL $1,875,887.20 $1,699,690.30 ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO. PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT 1000 Mobilization 1 LS 120,366.00 $120,366.00 62,128.00 $62,128.00 1005 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS 1,583.00 $1,583.00 15,000.00 $15,000.00 1010 Temporary Fencing 570 LF 5.30 $3,021.00 20.00 $11,400.00 1015 Saw Cut Existing Asphalt Concrete Pavement 1,750 LF 3.60 $6,300.00 5.00 $8,750.00 1020 Remove Existing Asphalt Concrete Pavement 1,060 SY 15.40 $16,324.00 15.00 $15,900.00 1025 Unsuitable Foundation Excavation, Incl. Haul 285 CY 39.20 $11,172.00 60.00 $17,100.00 1030 Structure Excavation for Tank Farm Foundation, Incl. Haul 260 CY 39.20 $10,192.00 50.00 $13,000.00 1035 Structure Excavation for Fuel Island Canopy Foundation, Incl. Haul 260 CY 39.20 $10,192.00 50.00 $13,000.00 1040 Quarry Spall (2" - 4") 206 TON 53.00 $10,918.00 72.00 $14,832.00 1045 Crushed Surfacing Base Course 802 TON 53.00 $42,506.00 78.00 $62,556.00 1050 Geotextile Structural Support Fabric 450 SY 10.40 $4,680.00 3.00 $1,350.00 1055 Geotextile Filter Fabric 260 SY 6.60 $1,716.00 3.00 $780.00 1060 Pipe Zone Bedding 115 TON 36.00 $4,140.00 111.00 $12,765.00 1065 Pipe Zone Bedding for Underground Fuel Lines 45 TON 93.00 $4,185.00 111.00 $4,995.00 1070 Gravel Borrow, Incl. Haul 182 TON 36.00 $6,552.00 60.00 $10,920.00 1075 HMA Cl. 1/2", PG 58V-22 278 TON 189.00 $52,542.00 142.00 $39,476.00 1080 Cement Concrete Pavement - Fuel Island Traffic Lane and Electrical Cabinet Support Pad 89 SY 243.00 $21,627.00 157.00 $13,973.00 1085 Cement Concrete for Fuel Island 15 SY 378.00 $5,670.00 390.00 $5,850.00 1090 Cement Concrete Foundation for Aboveground Storage Tanks 130 SY 279.50 $36,335.00 160.00 $20,800.00 1095 Cement Concrete Foundation for Fuel Island Canopy 1 LS 32,030.00 $32,030.00 12,200.00 $12,200.00 1100 Steel Structure 1 LS 115,658.00 $115,658.00 43,200.00 $43,200.00 1105 Sanitary Sewer Pipe, 6" Diameter (Ductile Iron Pipe) 180 LF 63.30 $11,394.00 58.00 $10,440.00 1110 Storm Sewer Pipe, 18" Diameter (Reinforced Concrete Pipe) 105 LF 81.60 $8,568.00 213.00 $22,365.00 1115 Shoring or Extra Excavation Class B 3,000 SF 18.38 $55,140.00 5.00 $15,000.00 1120 Catch Basin Type 1, Incl. Frame and Vaned Grate 3 EA 2,030.00 $6,090.00 2,350.00 $7,050.00 1125 Catch Basin Type 1L, Incl. Frame and Vaned Grate 2 EA 2,433.00 $4,866.00 3,690.00 $7,380.00 1130 Catch Basin Type 2, Incl. Frame and Vaned Grate 4 EA 4,736.00 $18,944.00 4,800.00 $19,200.00 1135 Remove Existing Catch Basin or Manhole 1 EA 1,701.00 $1,701.00 840.00 $840.00 1140 Remove Existing 15" Storm Sewer Pipe or Culvert 82 LF 30.00 $2,460.00 75.00 $6,150.00 1145 Oil Water Separator 1 LS 7,783.00 $7,783.00 9,983.00 $9,983.00 1150 New Fuel System 1 LS 643,922.00 $643,922.00 726,198.00 $726,198.00 1155 Fuel Management System and Tank Leak Detection Monitoring System 1 LS 146,848.00 $146,848.00 111,625.00 $111,625.00 1160 Electrical 1 LS 145,619.00 $145,619.00 112,080.00 $112,080.00 1165 Bollard 36 EA 725.00 $26,100.00 282.00 $10,152.00 1170 U Shaped Bollard 2 EA 2,390.00 $4,780.00 760.00 $1,520.00 1175 Fire Extinguisher Support, Mounts, Enclosures, Signs and Installation 1 LS 6,937.00 $6,937.00 2,850.00 $2,850.00 1180 Inlet Protection 7 EA 102.00 $714.00 320.00 $2,240.00 1185 Clear Plastic Covering 75 SY 12.00 $900.00 15.00 $1,125.00 1190 ESC Lead 50 HR 152.00 $7,600.00 100.00 $5,000.00 1 10.A.a Packet Pg. 270 At t a c h m e n t : F u e l T a n k R e p l a c e m e n t P r o j e c t B i d T a b ( 2 0 1 9 : F u e l T a n k R e p l a c e m e n t P r o j e c t B i d - A w a r d ) Fuel Tank Replacement Project Bid Opening: September 24, 2019, 11:00 AM Granite Petroleum Inc. Engineer's Estimate PO Box 6167 Skillings Connolly, Inc. Spokane, WA 99217 TOTAL $1,875,887.20 $1,699,690.30 ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO. PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT 1 1195 Baker Tank 1 FA 10,000.00 $10,000.00 10,000.00 $10,000.00 1200 Erosion/Water Pollution Control 1 FA 10,000.00 $10,000.00 10,000.00 $10,000.00 1205 Street Sweeping 50 HR 286.00 $14,300.00 210.00 $10,500.00 1210 SPCC Plan 1 LS 4,440.00 $4,440.00 2,000.00 $2,000.00 1215 Asphalt Cost Price Adjustment 1 CALC 5,000.00 $5,000.00 5,000.00 $5,000.00 1220 Minor Changes 1 CALC 10,000.00 $10,000.00 10,000.00 $10,000.00 1225 Cleaning and Inerting of Tanks 1 LS 18,567.00 $18,567.00 8,500.00 $8,500.00 1230 Remove Fence 100 LF 15.70 $1,570.00 15.00 $1,500.00 1235 6' High Polymer Coated Chain Link Fence, with Slats and Barb Wires 100 LF 63.50 $6,350.00 75.00 $7,500.00 1240 Topsoil Type A 20 CY 107.00 $2,140.00 75.00 $1,500.00 1245 PSIPE Thuja Occidentalis "Smaragd", Balled and Burlapped, min 6' tall 20 EA 187.00 $3,740.00 350.00 $7,000.00 1250 Wood Chip Mulch 10 CY 117.00 $1,170.00 50.00 $500.00 SUB TOTAL $1,705,352.00 $1,545,173.00 10% SALES TAX $170,535.20 $154,517.30 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TOTAL $1,875,887.20 $1,699,690.30 10.A.a Packet Pg. 271 At t a c h m e n t : F u e l T a n k R e p l a c e m e n t P r o j e c t B i d T a b ( 2 0 1 9 : F u e l T a n k R e p l a c e m e n t P r o j e c t B i d - A w a r d )