HomeMy WebLinkAbout4377ORDINANCE NO. 4377
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, amending the Kent
Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities
Element to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the
Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts for
the 2020/2021 through 2025/2026 school years
(cPA-2020-1).
RECITALS
A. The State of Washington Growth Management Act (GMA)
requires internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements and the
plans from other jurisdictions.
B. To assure that comprehensive plans remain relevant and up to
date, the GMA allows amendments to the capital facilities element of
comprehensive plans concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a city
budget. RcW 36.70A.130(2XaXiv).
C. The City of Kent has established procedures for amending its
Comprehensive Plan in Chapter L2.02 of the Kent City Code (KCC). KCC
12.02.010(AX5) allows amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the
Comprehensive Plan concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the
City budget. In that circumstance, the City Council holds the public hearing
on the Comprehensive Plan amendment rather than the Land Use and
Planning Board.
I Comprehensive PIan Amendment-
Capital Facilities Element and Six-Year
Capital Facilities Plans for School Districts
D. The Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts have
submitted proposed amendments to their Capital Facilities Plans for the
202012021 through 2025/2026 school years to be included in an
amendment of the City's Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive
Plan. No amended Capital Facilities Plans were received by the City from the
Highline or Renton School Districts, whose Capital Facilities Plans remain a
part of the Capital Facilities Element as last submitted.
E. After providing appropriate public notice, the City Council of
the City of Kent considered the requested Comprehensive Plan amendment
and held a public hearing on the same on October 20,202O.
F. On September 1t,2O2O, the City provided the required 60-day
notification under RCW 36.70A.106 to the Department of Commerce for the
State of Washington of the City's proposed amendment to the Capital
Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The 60-day notice period
passed on November 10, 2O2O.
G. On November t7,2O2O, the City Council of the City of Kent
approved the Capital Facilities Element amendment CPA-2020-1 to include
the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School
Districts for the 2020/2021 through 202512026 school years, as set forth in
Exhibit "A" attached and incorporated by this reference.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT,
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE
SECTION 7, - Amendment The Kent Comprehensive Plan, and its
Capital Facilities Element, are amended to include the Capital Facilities Plans
2 Comprehensive PIan Amendment-
Capital Facilities Element and Six-Year
Capital Facilities Plans for School Districts
of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts for the 2O20/2O2L
through 2025/2026 school years, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached and
incorporated by this reference (CPA-2O2O-L).
SECTION 2. - Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon
approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are
authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the
correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering; or
references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations.
SECTION 3, - Severability. If any one or more section, subsection,
or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, that
decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance
and the same shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 4, - Effective Date. This ordinance will take effect and be
in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law.
DANA MLPH, M
November 17, 2020
Date Approved
ATTEST:
l
KIMBERLEY KOMOTO,CLERK
APPROVED AS TO
RNEY
November 17. 2020
Date Adopted
Date Pub
3 Comprehensive Plan Amendment-
Capital Facilities Element and Six-Year
Capital Facilities Plans for School Districts
K, CITY
A,'t KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
EQUITY XCELLENCE I COMMUNITY
Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan
2020-21 through 2025-2026
June 2020
Kent School District No. 415
L2033 SE 256th Street
Kent, Washington 98030-6643
(2s3)373-72ss
BOARD of DIRECTORS
Ms. Leslie Hamada, President
Ms. Denise Daniels, Vice President
Ms. M aya Ve ngadasa la m, Legislative Re presentative
Ms. Michele Bettinger, Director
Ms. Leah Bowen, Director
ADMINISTRATION
Dr. Calvin J. Watts
Superintendent of Schools
lsrael Vela, Chief School Operations and Academic Support Officer
Dr. Jewelle Harmon, Chief Accountability Officer
Mr. Benjamin Rarick, Executive Director of Fiscal Services
Mr. Dave Bussard, Director of Capital Planning & Facilities
Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan
Table of Contents
l- Executive Summary
ll - Six - Year Enrollment Projection.
lll - Current Kent School District "Standard of Service".
Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students
Current District Standards of Service for Secondory Students....
lV - lnventory and Capacity of Existing Schools
V - Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan
Vl - Portable Classrooms .............
Vll - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity
Vlll- Finance Plan
lX - Summary of Changes to June 2020 Capital Facilities Plan
X - Appendices
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan
June 2020
Page 2 of 15
3
4
6
7
7
8
9
10
TL
12
.. 15
| - Executive Summary
This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan has been prepared by the Kent School District as the
organization's capital facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements
of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 2IA.43 and Cities of
Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual
Plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2O2O forthe 2O2O-2O27
school year. This annual update of the Plan reflects no new major capital projects, and
an inflation-based adjustment to prior year impact fee rates.
This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent
School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the
District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long-Range Capital
Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time
period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as
may be required.
Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by
Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and Renton and
included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each
jurisdiction. This Plan has also been submitted to cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley,
and SeaTac for their information and inclusion in their Comprehensive Plans.
ln order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School
District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee-
implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the
incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Auburn
must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances.
This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current
and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public lnstruction establishes
square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for local program
needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and
ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based
on specific needs for students of the District.
This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Program
capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special
programs served in each building. Portables in the capacity calculation use the same
standard of service as the permanent facilities.
The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District's standard of
service and the existing inventory of permanent facilities. The District's program capacity
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan
June 2020
Page 3 of 15
of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the state's mandated reduction of
class size to meet the standard of service for Kent School District. Portables provide
additional transitional capacity.
Kent School District is the fifth largest (FTE basis) district in the state. Enrollment is
electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public lnstruction
('OSPl") on Form P-223. Although funding apportionment is based on AnnualAverage Full
Time Equivalent (AAFTE), enrollment on October 1 is a widely recognized "snapshot in
time" that is used to report the District's enrollment for the year as reported to OSPI.
The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of
transitional facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The District
plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of
portables.
This Plan currently represents projects in process funded primarily by the Kent School
District's 2016 Bond. Additional information about these projects can be found at the
district's capital projects homepage (link). Additionally, project updates sent to our
community of stakeholders can be accessed on the KSD website (link).
ll - Six - Year Enrollment Projection
For capital facilities planning, enrollment growth projections are based on cohort survival
and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six
years (See Table 2).
King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used to
determine the number of kindergartners entering the system (See Toble 1).7.75% of
25,800 King County live births in 2015 is projected for L,976 students expected in
Kindergarten for October L,2OZO.This is an increase of 1-39 live births in King County over
the previous year (See Table 2).
Early Childhood Education students (also identified as "ECE"), "Early Childhood Special
Education ('ECSE") students are forecast and reported to OSPI separately on Form P-223H
for Special Education Enrollment. Capacity is reserved to serve students in the ECE
programs at elementary schools.
The first-grade population of Kent School District is traditionally t-3% larger than the
kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District. Cohort survival
method uses historical enrollment data to forecast the number of students projected for
the following year. Projections for October L, 2020-2025 are from OSPI Report 1049 -
Determination of Projected Enrollments.
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan
June 2020
Page 4 of 15
Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The
District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools.
lnformation on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed
developments in all jurisdictions will be considered in the District's future analysis of
growth projections.
The Kent School District serves eight permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King
County, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, and Auburn and smaller portions of the
cities of SeaTac, Black Diamond, and Maple Valley.
STUDENT GEN ERATION FACTOR
"Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school
district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated
by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for
developments completed within the last ten years.
Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School District is as
follows:
Single Family .334
.o78
.tL7
.529
.TL7
.o28
.048
.193
The student generation factor is based on a survey of 2,767 single-family dwelling units
and 1,831 multi-family dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy rates.
ln preparing the 2020-202L to 2025-2O26 Capital Facilities Plan the District contracted
with Davis Demographics and Planning (DDP) of Riverside California, a noted expert in
demographic studies for school districts, to analyze and prepare the student generation
factor. DDP used a larger sample of single-family residences than the district did in
previous plans and included both "garden" and "urban style" apartments in the
calculation for multi-family residences.
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan
lune 2020
Page 5 of 15
Multi-Family
Elementary
Middle School
Senior High
Total
Elementary
Middle School
Senior High
Total
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415
ocToBER REPORT 1251H (HEADCOUNT) ENROLLMENT H|STORY
For 2020 CFP - Headcount Enrollment History
LB = Live Births LB in 2005 LB in 2006 LB in 2007 LB in 2008 LB in 2009 LB in 2010 LB in 201 1 LB in 201 2 LB in 2O13 LB in 2014
October HC Enrollment
King County Live Births
2010 2011
22,680
2012
24,899
2013
2s,222
2014
25,057
2015
24,514
2016
24,630
2017
25,O32
2018
24 910
2019
25,348
lncrease / Decrease 194 't,564 655 323 -1 65 -543 116 402 280 316
Kindergarten/Birth%'8.130/o 8.18o/o 8.570/o 8.4Oo/o 8.340 8.34o/o 8.170/o 8.14%7.98o/o 7.93%
Kinderqarten 1845 1983 213r'.2119 2090 2045 2013 2037 1 989 2010
Grade 1 1996 1 888 2017 2186 2127 2131 2067 2056 2061 2036
Grade 2 1942 2016 1 905 2055 2190 2163 2163 2077 2008 2091
Grade 3 2002 1983 2082 1922 2070 2176 2195 2143 2043 1 995
Grade 4 1956 2024 2000 2087 1956 2089 2195 2218 2118 2038
Grade 5 2086 1974 2044 2008 2116 1958 2103 2189 2't69 2120
Grade 6 2135 2135 2026 2079 2023 2058 1952 2120 2184 2164
Grade 7 iriddre schoor 2095 2105 2139 2046 2104 1974 2021 1922 2044 2166
Grade 8 2153 2111 2139 2121 2091 2100 2021 2043 1882 2073
Grade 9 Senior High 2440 2471 2455 2483 2428 2093 2105 2006 2004 1 888
Grade 10 2238 2272 2092 2046 2151 2165 2099 2080 1946 2035
Grade 11 2048 1 995 1933 1873 1802 1818 1865 1823 1732 1663
Grade 12 1694 1658 1646 1539 1576 1742 1 730 1810 1654 1634
Total Enrollment 2 26,630 26,615 26,612 26,564 26,724 26.512 26,529 26,524 25,834 25.913
Yearly Headmunt
lncrease / Decrease 134 15 -3 -48 160 -212 17 -5 -690 79
Cumulative lncrease -201 -216 -219 -267 -107 -319 -302 -307 -997 -918
Change to Day Knderyaften for all schools
I This number indicates actual births in King County 5 years prior to enrollment year as updated by Washington State Department of
Health, Center for Health Statistics. Kent School District percentage based on actual Krndergarten enrollment 5 years later
2 Enrollment reported to OSPI on Form P-223 generates basic education funding and excludes Early Childhood Special Education
('ECSE' & "B2" or Birth to 2 Preschool lnclusive Education) and excludes College-only Running Start students.
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table I June 2020
2019- 2025 Proiections from OSPI Report {049
Full Day Kindergarten at all Elem LB in 2014 LB in 2015 LB in 2016 LB in 2017 LB in 20'18 LB in 2019 Est LB in 2020
ACTUAL
ENROLLMENT
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT
October 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
King County Live Births
lncrease / Decrease
Kindergarten / Birth %
25,348
438
7.93o/o
25,487
139
7.75%
26,01 1
524
754%
26,011
0
7.48o/o
26,011
0
7 .42o/o
26,011
0
7.360/o
26,011
0
7.30o/o
FD Kindergarten
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
Grade 7
Grade 8
Grade 9
Grade 10
Grade 11
Grade 12
2,OrO
2,036
2,091
1,99s
2,038
2,L20
2,L64
2,166
2,073
1,888
2,03s
L,663
L,634
\,975
2,04s
2,047
2,081,
2,000
2,03r
2,L09
2,r20
2,t77
2,064
1,838
L,735
\,577
7,961
2,OtO
2,056
2,037
2,087
1",993
2,020
2,066
2,T3I
2,1,68
2,009
t,567
7,645
1,945
1,995
2,02L
2,046
2,042
2,080
r,982
1,979
2,077
2,L22
2,LLL
t,7L2
L,486
r,929
L,978
2,006
2,Ott
2,052
2,03s
2,069
L,942
1,989
2,068
2,056
L,799
r,623
L,9t4
L,962
1,989
1,995
2,0!6
2,045
2,024
2,027
r,952
1,981
2,0r3
T,76L
r,706
1,898
7,947
1,,973
!,979
2,007
2,009
2,034
1,983
2,038
7,944
L,929
r,716
t,670
Total Enrollment 25,913 25,800 25,750 25,598 2s,s67 2s,386 2s,r2t
Yearly lncrease/Decrease 79 -1 13 -50 -152 -31 -1 81 -265
Yearly lncrease/Decrease %O.31o/o -O.44o/o -O.19o/o -0.59o/o -O.'l2o/o -O.71o/o 'l.Q4o/o
Total Enrollment 3 800 750 121
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICTNo. 415
SIX-YEAR ENROLLMENT PROJECTION
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 June 2020
Urban style apartments typically have four stories, a central lobby and entrance, elevator
access to all floors and have a central corridor with apartments on each side. These
apartments have little or no surface street parking, with parking located beneath the
building; retail may or may not be included with the building. lf there is retail, it will
generally be located on the first floor. These apartments seldom have swimming pools
and do not have playgrounds for children.
Garden style apartments will have very little studio apartments and will have more three-
bedroom apartments then the urban style and in theory generate more students enrolled
in school. These apartments will also have lawns, club houses, swimming pools and places
for children to play.
The District felt that it is important to include both styles of apartments for the student
generation factor. Though it is anticipated that few students will come from the urban
style, they are now part of the mix in Kent and thus should be included in mix of multi-
family housing units.
Within the district's borders there are several low-income and multi-family housing
projects coming on-line during 2O2O-2O2L. Once developed with occupancy occurring the
District does recognize that the student generation for multi-family housing may impact
future Capital Facilities Plan updates.
lll - Current Kent School District "Standard of Service"
ln order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County Code
21A.06 references a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order
to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the
class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other
factors determined by the district which would best serve the student population.
This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The
District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as "impact" schools
and the standard of service targets a lower-class size at those facilities. Portables included
in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities.
The standard of service defined herein will continue to evolve in the future. Kent School
District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of
changes to capacity and standard of service. This process will affect various aspects of the
District's standard of service and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities
plans.
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan
June 2020
Page 6 of 15
Current Standords of Service for Elementary Students
Class size ratio for grades K - 3 is planned for an average of 23 students per class,
not to exceed 26.
Class size ratio for grades 4 - 6 is planned for an average of 27 students per class,
not to exceed 29.
Some special programs require specialized classroom space and the program capacity of
some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example,
leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in special
programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs.
Students may also be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate
classroom or facility.
Some identified students will also be provided educational opportunities in classrooms
for special programs such as those designated as follows:
English Learners (EL)
Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title l) - Federal Program
Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) - State Program
Highly Capable Students - State Program
Reading, math or science Labs
Dual Language Programs in four elementary schools
lnclusive Education Service for Elementary and Secondary students with disabilities may
be provided in a separate or self-contained classroom sometimes with a capacity of 10-
15 depending on the program.
Current District Standards of Seruice for Secondary Students
The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational
opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the
school buildings per the negotiated collective bargaining agreement with KEA.
The average class size ratio for grades 7-8 is 30 students per class and 143
students per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 150 based on
five class periods per day.
a
a
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan
June 2020
Page 7 of 15
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415
INVENTORY and CAPAGIW of EXISTING SCHOOLS
SCHOOL Year
Opened
ABR ADDRESS
2019-2020
Program
Capacity
Carriage Crest Elementary
Cedar Valley Elementary
Covington Elementary
Crestwood Elementary
1 990
1971
2018
1 980
CC'18235-140thAvenueSE, Renton 98058
CV 26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042
CO 25811 l56thAvenueSE, Covington98042
CW 25225- lEothAvenueSE, Covington 98042
428
360
630
408
East Hill Elementary
Emerald Park
Fairwood Elementary
George T. Daniel Elementary
1 953
1 999
1 969
1 992
EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031
EP 11800SE216thSkeet, Kent 98031
FW'16600- l4SthAvenueSE, Renton 98058
DE 11310SE248thSheet, Kent 98030
464
477
386
432
Glenridge Elementary
Grass Lake Elementary
Horizon Elementary
Jenkins Creek Elemenlarv
1996
1971
1990
't987
GR 19405 - 120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058
GL 28700 - 191st Place SE, Kent 98042
HE 27641 - 1441h Avenue SE, Kent 98042
JC 26915 - 186th Avenue SE, Covinqton 98042
431
428
477
384
Kent Elementary
Kent Valley Early Learning Center
Lake Youngs Elementary
Martin Sortun Elementary
Meadow Ridge Elementary
KE 24700-64lhAvenueSouth, Kent 98032
KV 3'17 --4lh Ave S, Kent, WA 98032
LY 19660-142ndAvenue SE, Kent 98042
MS 127'11 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030
MR 27710 - 1081h Avenue SE, Kent 98030
1999
2014
1 965
't 987
1 994
454
318
497
455
454
Meridian Elementary
Millennium Elementary
Neely-O'Brien Elementary
Panther Lake Elementarv
1939
2000
1990
2009
ME 25621 - 140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042
ML 11919SE270thStreet, Kent 98030
NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032
PL 12022SE 216th Street, Kent, 98031
497
478
454
552
Park Orchard Elementary
Pine Tree Elementary
Ridgewood Elementary
Sawver Woods Elementarv
1 963
1967
1987
1 994
PO 11010SE232ndStreet, Kent 98031
PT 27825-118thAvenueSE, Kent 98030
RW 18030-162nd PlaceSE, Renton 98058
SW 3'l 135 - 228th Ave SE, Black Diamond 98010
463
487
477
477
Scenic Hill Elementary
Soos Creek Elementary
Springbrook Elementary
Sunrise Elementary
Elementary TOTAL
Cedar Heights Middle School
Mattson Middle School
Meeker Middle School
Meridian Middle School
Mill Creek Middle School
Northwood Middle School
Maddle School TOTAL
Kent-Meridian High School
Kentlake Senior High School
Kentridge Senior High School
Kentwood Senior High School
Senior High TOTAL
Kent Mountain View Academy
Kent Phoenix Academy
DISTRICT TOTAL
1960
1971
1 969
1992
SH 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030
SC 12651 SE218thPlace, Kent 98031
SB 20035 - 100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031
SR 22300 - 132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042
CH 19640 SE 272 Street, Covington 98042
MA 16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042
MK 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058
MM 23480- l20thAvenueSE, Kent 98031
MC 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032
NW 17007 SE 'l84th Street, Renton 98058
KM 10020SE256thStreet, Kent 98030
KL 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042
KR 12430SE208thStreet, Kent 98031
KW 25800- l64thAvenueSE, Covington 98042
MVILC 22420 MilitaryRoad, DesMoines 98198
PH 11000SE264thStreet, Kent 98030
454
360
396
477
1 993
1 981
1970
1958
2005
1 996
13,055
5,148
1,904
1,957
2,277
2,159
8,297
396
414
27.310
895
787
832
792
916
926
1951
1997
1 968
1 981
1 997
2007
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 June 2020
6
d&
KENT
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
518
t4
Kent School District Demographic Report
+
I
l
l;llrl';l
bq
f
N
c3
o?6
irt
-{t'q
b+
atd'
"d*
-
UJ(a
o
g
54
.
t
gJ
,h
$oEs i
t
g
qe
\
\
|lJp
ot
$!f,€
f
G
,,. sE
(a
&
L'h
F
-- .S€ ?3?nd St Valleqt
Elk Fun
6oll Club
l2ird sr ,..- - .Hen
Ril
0pen.!
tr.,
ah
,$t
il
'it,
&
t,
F
.
':.3E:30,tfi sr
ft llr
SAYUYER
ODs ES
FhtIdo3Ia
*
Lo! Hill ,l
sE 3l?fi,tt
1i
A'dvf
Elementary Schools and Current Enrollment
Carriage Crest - 457, Cedar Valley - 241, Covington -628, Crestwood -518, Daniel - 458, East Hill - 478, Emerald Park - 523, Fairwood - 349,
Glenridge-495, GrassLake-419, Horizon-460, JenkinsCreek-433, Kent-671, LakeYoungs-479, MarlinSortun-661, MeadowRidge-492,
Meridian-540,Millennium-596,NeelyO'Brien-768,PantherLake-664,ParkOrchard-453,PineTree-436,Ridgewood-506,
Sawyer Woods - 441 , Scenic Hill - 615, Soos Creek - 365, Springbrook - 496, Sunrise - 696
Map provided by David Demographics
June 2020
Kent School District Demographic Repot - Middle Schools
t
I
I
Sourd
a
I
$c
{61
Mr00le scnools and current tnrollment
Cedar Heighb - 673, Mattson - 691, Meeker - 717,
Meridian - 591, Mill Creek - 887, Northwood - 598
SoEe.: E i. HEE, Dlorm, USGS,ld.rmrt,lrcREMEm 4NC.G EilJ.t.r, METI. E{lchh. (hnaKone), E lKo..r. Eln(lhlhnd), t.pny'ndb. NGCC, O OFnSa..Wat conhlbr!.ddS. Gtg U$Cmmunly
'l:144,448
1.75 3.5
275 55
June 2020
7mi
11 kn
Li5 O.hot.!hbtA PhnnlE
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan
Kent School District Demographic Repoft - High Schools
tte
P$yel $o[nd I
iql{y'fin
&y dlrtw.';rr1
a
Oa aat.itt --ldd6 lwJ
at
T!t
frfrl
La. NltatrtsS
,}II
M.
tllb*t
t
a
ffvihiffq
t
Ip
'"it\*.
'. &*
ffi .,-6..isb'
Hign scnools an0 current Enrollment
Kent Meridian - 1858, Kentlake - 1382.
Kentridge - 1818 Kentwood - 1750
Sore!:Eui. HEE, hl!.m. USGS,ld.rm.t, lrcR€M€M P,
mC.q EldJ.p.n, UETI. E!il Cnh. {Sne KonC), E.dKor.!, Eei(Ihlhnd), M.p6tndh. NGCC. O OFnSt..Urp Go.!dubr!,idrh. Gls usrcnmonly
'l:'144,448
1.75
June 2020
2.75 5.5
3.5 7mi
11 km
LS! O.hot.pht! I PL.nlEKent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan
a The average class size ratio for grades 9-12 is 32 students per class and 153
students per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 160 based on
five class periods per day.
Similar to lnclusive Education Programs listed above, many other secondary programs
require specialized classroom space which can reduce the program capacity of the
permanent school buildings, such as technology labs, performing arts activities, a variety
of career and technical education programs, and other specialized programs.
Space or Classroom Utilization
As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms
for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a workspace during their planning
periods, it is not possible to achieve tOO% utilization of regular teaching stations at
secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the District
has determined that the standard utilization rate is 85%for secondary schools. Program
capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level.
lV - lnventory and Capacity of Existing Schools
Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 27,31O students and
transitional (portable) capacity to house 2,085. This capacity is based on the District's
Standard of Service as set forth in Section lll. lncluded in this Plan is an inventory of the
District's schools by type, address and current capacity (See Table 3). The ratio between
permanent capacity and portable capacity is94.9%-5.1%.
The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs, additional
classrooms and new schools. Program capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect
program changes implemented in the Fall of 2019.
Calculation of Elementary, Middle School and Senior High School capacities are set forth
in Appendices A, B, and C. Maps of existing schools are included.
For clarification, the following is a brief description of some of the non-traditional
programs for students in Kent School District:
Both the Kent Mountain View Academy and the Kent Phoenix Academy are now sharing
the building that formerly served Sequoia Middle School beginning the school year 2OL9-
2020.
Kent School District Six-Year CapitaI Facilities Plan
lune 2020
Page 8 of 15
iGrad - Kent School District has developed the lndividualized Graduation and Degree
Program or "iGrad". iGrad offers a second chance to students age 16-21 who have
dropped out of high school and want to earn a high school diploma. iGrad is not included
in this Capital Facilities Plan because it is served in leased space at the Kent Hill Plaza
Shopping Center. Over the past three years, enrollment in the iGrad program has
averaged over 300 students.
V - Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan
ln November 2OL6, the voters of the Kent School District approved a bond measure for
5252 million. This new bonding authority provided for the replacement for Covington
Elementary school, which opened in August of 2078, a new elementary school in the Kent
Valley (Currently being built at the former location of Kent Mountain View Academy), and
the twenty additional classrooms project redirected by the Kent School Board to build a
20 classroom Kent Academy Facility housing multiple academy programs in our district,
which is currently underway at the site of the Old Panther Lake Elementary School.
At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring 2020, the following projects to increase
capacity are either in the planning phase or will start in spring 2O2O.
Construction is in progress for New Valley Elementary School (project name only)
on West Hill within the City Limits of SeaTac, WA. The 89,000 square foot K-6
school project is being funded with bond funds and impact fees from King County.
a
o Construction is in progress to add New Academy Facility at the Old Panther Lake
Elementary Site in Kent in order to free up space at the current Kent Phoenix
Academy location (formerly Sequoyah Middle School) for additional classroom
space if needed and/or to open another middle school in the near future. The
new 59,000 square foot facility will accommodate a variety of Academy Programs
within the Kent School District.
Some funding for lease or purchase of additional portables may be provided by
impact fees as needed. Sites are based on need for additional capacity.
As a critical component of capital facilities planning, county and city planners and
decision-makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when
reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should
include sidewalks for pedestrian safety to and from school and bus stops as well as bus
pull-outs and turn-arounds.
lncluded in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District
which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future (See Table 4 & Site map).
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan
June 2020
Page 9 of 15
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415
Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity
SCHOOL/FACILIry/SITE LOCATION Status
Projected
Completion
Date
Projected
Program
o/" for
new
Growth
on
Map ELEMENTARY
#on
Map ' orHER strEs AceurRED Land Use
Designation
Land Use
Jurisdiction
6 New Valley Elementary School Old Kent Mountain View Academy Site Elementary
Addition
MIDDLE SCHOOL & SENIOR HIGH
3 New Academy Site Old Panther Lake Elementary Site Academy
TEMPORARY FACILITIES
Portables I TBD - For placement as needed
1 164thSE(AcrossfromMattson) 25230-25O5O164thSE,Covington 98042
2 Ham Lake area (Pollard) 16820 SE 240, Kent 98042
4 Shady Lk area (Sowers, Blaine, Drahota, Paroline) 17426 SE 1 92 Street, Renton 98058
5 SE of Lake Morton area (West property) SE 332 & 204 SE, Kent 98042
1 0 South Central Site (Yeh) SE 286th St & 1 24th Ave SE, Auburn 98092
12 256th - Covington (Halleson) 25435 SE 256th, Covington 98042
12a 156th - Covington (Wikstrom) 25847 1 56th Ave. SE, Covington 98042
Notes:
I App-,ir"f"l App.ir"t"
Under
Construction 2021-2022 700 1000
Under
Construction 2021-2022 480 lOOo/o
Additional
Capacity
New Planning 2O2O+ 24-s1 each lo0o/o
Rural
Rural
Urban
Rural
Urban
Rural
Rural
TBD
Elementary
Elementary
Secondary
TBD
To be sold
To be sold
King County
King County
King County
King County
King County
King County
King County
1 TBD - To be determined - Some sites are identified but placement, timing and/or configuration of portables has not been determined.
2 Numbers correspond to sites on Site Bank Map on Page 19. Other Map site locations are parcels identified in Table 7 on Page 29.
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 June 2020
IrA:r,liir']Tt>It.?)...olN)(:i::;|.!:,j;|?,,1:,il;:1L rt.l. :4,tIlr,,- | "I'i:\-n',zu;\t:32tCI t)/.:)!)=,c,; ll3€''!r.,, J-";'.-l;xtrli::r...... 'rL:c_ ri:":., ,'.,.,,, ,N)oii:'i ir::ll,:I-FiiErr=36.D-. r,r)!ril:ril:;a;i)C!)Il""z'l/:i:)!i..,. ."ji,.'* ,:1i*+>-L:I2',"!,:o.,-. a2ia,rr:i,ani "".il::i. ... ..;1. . ..l,: ::i.-:::,'ii::i.1'i: i-'.;. ,1i16tb (o'r:1,.,,..!ti:=eI i"l?, :a)a):;/ {'ll::iiIt*lqihTIr &4thi. i' li- :iri!, .ir,.,;ts+.-o l.^ r: li:!.a:io{3D-I,i- ,ii..\. )i?Io9ewo,f2sLoJtJto:a)qro-il tal''":+di:.,..:atJ:>' ':.6'o6n€g5g8.IxoJI=ao=.6x'ooooEdJI6'!o=ooE€=-vo-r=!oo=!DzzIt{=6'EqooI3oe6'qB-oE'
Voter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for some of
these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some
funding is secured for purchase of additional sites, but some may be funded with impact
fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction
requirements and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. The
Board of Directors has started the process to sell surplus property in the spring of 2020.
The Board will continue an annual review of standards of service and those decisions will
be reflected in each update of the Capital Facilities Plan.
Vl - Portable Classrooms
The Plan references use of portables as interim or transitional capacity and facilities
Currently, the District utilizes portables to house students in excess of permanent capacity
and for program purposes at some school locations (Please see Appendices A, B, C).
Based on enrollment projections, implementation of full day kindergarten programs,
lower state mandated class sizes, program capacity, and the need for additional
permanent capacity, the District anticipates the need to purchase or lease additional
portables during the next six-year period.
During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the
District's portables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some
of the portables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and
increase in others, and these portables provide the flexibility to accommodate the
immediate needs of the community.
Portables may be used as interim or transitional facilities
L. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent schoolfacilities.
2. To cover the gap between the times of demand for increased capacity and
completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand.
3. To meet unique program requirements.
Portables currently in the District's inventory are continually evaluated resulting in some
being improved and some replaced.
The Plan projects that the District will use portables to accommodate interim housing
needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of portables, their impacts on permanent
facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between portables,
emerging technologies, and educational restructuring will continue to be examined.
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan
June 2020
Page 10 of 15
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415
PROJEGTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
TOTAL DISTRICT
PROJECTET
Permanent Program Capacity 1 27,255 27,255 27,255 28,435 28,435 28,435
c to Permanent Capacity 1
Capacity lncrease (F)
New Elementary School2
New Academy (Old PL Site)480
Additional Permanent Classrooms
700
00000
SCHOOL YEAR 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25
Actual
27,255 27,255 28,435 28,435 28,435 28,435
lnterim Portable Capacitv s
Elemenlary Portable Capacity Required
Middle School Portable Capacity Required 5
Senior High School Portable Capacity Required 5
1 336336336456,248,440
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal
1,440 1,248 456 336 336 336
ITY 1TOTAL 28 695 891 28 771 28 771-IW
TOTAL ENROLLMENT/ PRO.IFCTION 4
DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 5
2.782 2.703 3.'t41 3.173 3.204 3,385
1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes.
2 New Elementary school will increase capacity and will be built on the existing site of Kent Mountain View Academy.
3 ZOI}-ZOZO total classroom portable capacity is 1440. Some additional relocatable used for program purposes.
a Actual October Headcount Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments.
5 School capacity meets concurrency requirements and no impact fees are proposed for secondary schools.
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 June 2020
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
ELEMENTARY Grades K - 6
R
Elementary Permanent Capacity 1 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,700 13,700 13,700
New Elementary School - Kent Valley
Additional Permanent Classrooms z 0 0 0 0 0 0
subtotal 13,000 13,000 13,700 13,700 13,700 13,700
Portable Capacity Required 1 1440 1248 456 336 336 336
700
SCHOOL YEAR 20't9-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25
Actual
't 12 I M,qqo M,248 14,156 14,036 14,036 14,036
ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 14 11119114164 1 13
SURPLUS (DEFICII CAPACITY -14 -41 -8 75 -44 90
Number of Portables Required 60 52 19 14 14 't4
I Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changer
2 Additional classrooms will be placed at schools with the greatest need for aleve overcrowding
3 Actual October Headcount Enrollmentwith Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollmen
Enrollment & Projections reflect FULL Day Kindergarten at ALL Elementary schools @ 1.0 & exclude ECSE Preschr
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A June 2020
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and GAPACITY
MIDDLE SCHOOL Grades 7 - 8
Middle School Permanent Capacitvl 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148
No Chanoes to Middle School Caoacitv
Subtotal 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148
Portable uired 0 0 0 0 0 00
SCHOOL YEAR 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-2026
PROJECTED
TOTAL CAPACITY 1&3 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148
ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 4 297 4 197 4 056 3 931 979 4 021
(DEFICIT)I t,ztt I I t,tzt
NumberofPortablesRequired 0 0 0 0 0 0
No Classroom Portables required at middle schools at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes.
0
1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes.2 Actual October Headcount Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments.3 Surplus capacity due to grade level reconfiguration - All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004.
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B June 2020
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
SENIOR HIGH Grades I - 12
Senior High Permanent Capacity'8,297 8,297 8,297 8,777 8,777 8,777 8,777
New Academy (Old PL site)480
No Changes to High School Capacitv
subtotal 8,297 8,297 8,777 8,777 8,777 8,777 8,777
Portables Caoacitv Required 1 0 0 0 0 00
SCHOOL YEAR 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-2025 2025-2026
PROJECTED
TOTAL CAPACITY 8 777I2978777 8 777 8 777 777
ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 7 17722072147389 7 1 7
SURPLUS tct CAPACITY 1107710831388 1 221 1 316 1
NumberofPortablesRequired 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
No Classroom Portables required at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes.
1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes
3 Actual October Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments.
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C June 2020
Vll - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity
As stated in Section lV, the program capacity study is periodically updated for changes in
special programs and reflects class size requirements, class size fluctuations etc. As shown
in the lnventory and Capacity chart in Table 3, the program capacity is also reflected in
the capacity and enrollment comparison charts (See Tables 5 & 5 a-b-c).
Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and
funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of
October is widely recognized as the enrollment "snapshot in time" to report enrollment
for the year.
Kent School District continues to be the fifth largest district (both FTE and headcount
basis) in the state of Washington. The P-223 Headcount for October 2OL9 was 25,833
with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECSE and college-only Running
Start students. A full headcount of all students enrolled in October 2019 totals 26,749
which included ECSE and college-only Running Start students.
ln October 2019, there were L,L77 students in l1th and 1-2th grade participating in the
Running Start program at different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school
and college graduation. Of these students, 654 attended classes only at the college
("college-only") and are excluded from FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment
comparisons. Kent School District has one of the highest Running Start program
participation rates in the state.
Based on the enrollment forecasts, permanent facility inventory and capacity, current
standard of service, portable capacity, and future additional classroom space, the District
plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of
portables (See Table 5 and Tables 5 a-b-c).
This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There may be
a need for additional portables and/or new schools to accommodate growth within the
District. New schools may be designed to accommodate placement of future portables.
School attendance area changes, limited and costly movement of portables, zoning
changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in
addressing overcrowding and underutilization of facilities in different parts of the District.
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan
June 2020
Page 11 of 15
Vlll - Finance Plan
The finance plan shown on Table 5 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to
finance improvements for the years 2O2O-202L through 2025-2026. The financing
components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based
on future bond issues, state school construction assistance, collection of impact fees
under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to
State Environmental Policy Act.
The plan also includes an additional elementary school in the Kent Valley which is
currently under construction at the current site of the Kent Mountain View Academy on
Military Road in SeaTac. Kent Mountain View Academy moved into and is sharing space
at the current Kent Phoenix Academy (located at the former Sequoyah Middle School)
starting the 2019-2020 school year. This new school will increase the capacity at the
elementary level by 700 students. Some impact fees are scheduled to be part of the
overallfinance plan.
ln November 20L6, the District held a special election to approve the authorization of
5252,000,000 in bonding authority. The projects described above are part of this
authorization. The first series of bonds (S80 million) were issued in February 2OI7, which
funded the Covington Elementary Replacement School, as well as other infrastructure
projects. lmpact fees will be used at both projects due to escalation in construction pricing
across the pocific northwest.
The Finance Plan includes new portables to be purchased or leased to provide additional
capacity and some may be funded from impact fees.
Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary level
and unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future and reported in annual updates
of the Capital Facilities Plan. No impact fees are requested for secondary schools in this
Plan.
For the Six-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent
School District Capital Planning Department. Please see pages L3-t4for a summary of the
cost basis.
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan
lune 2020
Page 12 of 15
'F=Funded U=Unfunded
NOTES:
2 The District anlicipates receiving some State Funding construction Assistance for some prcjecls.
3 Facility needs are pending review. Some of these prcjec,ts may be tunded wilh impact fees.
4 Cost of podables based on curent cost and adjusted for inflation tor fulure years.
s Fess in ihis column ere besed on amounl of fe6s @ll6clad lo delo and oslimaled fe6s on futu6 unils-
Kent Schaol District Six-Year Capifal Facilities Plan
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415
SIX.YEAR FINANCE PLAN
Table 6
SCHOOL FACILITIES 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL
Secuted
Lo€l & Stato slate 2 or Local 3
Unsecured
_5tsees
lmpact
PERMANENT FACILITIES
New Elementary School - Kent Valley
Elementary Site Acquisition (,l0 acres)
New Acad€my Facility/ 20 Classrooms
\o Secondary School Projects at this time.
TFMPORARY FACil ITIFS
Additional porlables 3''
OTHFR
t11.m0.000 $16.000,000 $26,000.000
cr,770,355
t5,000,000 $13,000,000 $18,000,000
$393,760
3 potlrbleE
$393,750 $393,750
$53,000,000
$1,770,355
$36,000,000
051,000,000
$1,270,355
s30,000,000
$2,000,000
$500,000
$6,000,000
Totals $0 s0 s0 $0tt8-164.t(F s29.000.000 344.000.000 991.164.10s $42.270.355 $0 t8.893.750
June 2020
Kent School District Six-Year C8pital Facjlities Plan
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.4I5
Site Acquisitions & Gosts
Average of Sites Purchasod, Sold or Bullt on wlthln last 10 Years
Table 7 June 2020
Type &
# on Mao School / Site
Ysar Open /
Purchased
Sold Location Acr€aoe CosUPrice Aw cost-ori@/acre Total Averaoe Cost / Acre
Elementary
12 I Ufian
7 I Runl
3 / Rural
6 / Rural
Property Sale-2g.7 acres of Plemons-Yeh site 2016
2015
2019
2019
SSE 1241h Ave and 284th ST SE
2900 Kent Black Diamond RD SE
17070 SE Wax Rd, Covinglon
SE 2641h St., Kenl
Elementary Site Subtolal
29.70
13.25
8.00
10.00
$947,536
$330,000
$3,869,697
$1,770,355
$31,904
$24,906
$483,712
$177,036
Property Sal6 - Scarsella site
Properiy Sale - Old Covington Parcel A,
#362206-9081
Property purchas€d for new elementary
60.95 $6,917,588 $1 13,496
Elem Bib eEEde
Middle School
No Acquisitions for l\iliddle School 0.00 $0
0.00 $0 $0
S6nior High
No Acquisilions for Senior Highs 0.00 $0 $0
Senior High Site subtotat 0.00 $o $0
Nole: All ruEi sites weG purchased priorto adoption of Urban Growth Area.
to 2010
Total Ac€age & Cost
60 95 $6 917 588
Totrl Avengs Colt rAcE
$1'13,496
Cost Basis Summary
For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last elementary
school, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost of the future elementary schools and
additiona I classrooms.
Project Projected Cost
New Elementary School
Kent Valley (To open Fall2O2Il
S53,ooo,ooo
New Academy Facility (To open Fall2O2Ll S36,ooo,ooo
Site Acquisition Cost
The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within
the last ten years. Please see Table 7 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages.
District Adjustment
The impact fee calculations on Appendix B & C include a "District Adjustment" which is
equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas total for this year and
adjusted for the increase in the Consumer Price lndex (25%l for the Seattle metropolitan
area.
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan
June 2020
Page 13 of 15
lX - Summary of Changes to June 2O2O Capital Facilities Plan
The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in
effect since l-993. The primary changes from the June 2019 Plan are summarized here.
Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in class size ratio as well as program
changes. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect use, lease or purchase, sale,
surplus and/or movement between facilities.
The district worked with contractor David Demographics out of Riverside California to
update student generation factors. The updated rates are included in the body of the
Plan.
The student headcount enrollment forecast is updated annually. All Elementary schools
now have Full Day Kindergarten so six-year Kindergarten projections were previously
modified to meet the requirements for Full Day Kindergarten programs at all elementary
schools.
The district expects to receive some State Funding Assistance (formerly called "state
matching funds") for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually.
Unfunded site and facility needs will be reviewed in the future.
The impact fees for 2021 calendar year will increase by the percentage increase of the
consumer price index for the Seattle metropolitan area. The increasefor 2O2t calendar
year is 2.5o/o. For single-family residences, the fee will increase by $fa8.85 to 55,692.85.
The impact fee for multi-family units will increase by 558.63 to 52,403.63.
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan
June 2020
Page 14 of 15
X - Appendices
Changes to lmpact Fee Calculation Factors include:
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan
June 2020
ITEM Grade/type FROM TO Comments
Student Generation Factor
Single Family (SF)
Elem
MS
SH
Total
0.398
0.096
0.185
0.334
0.078
o.tt7
0.679 0.529 0.150 Decrease
Student Generation Factor
Multi-Family (MF)
Elem
MS
SH
Total
o.tL7
0.028
0.029
o.tr7
0.028
0.048
o.r74 0.193 0.019 lncrease
State Funding Assistance Ratios ("State Match")
Area Cost Allowance
Average Assessed Valuation (AV)
AV - Average of Condominiums & Apts.
SF
MF
s6.96%
s22s.97
5407,25s
s1s1,126
56.96%
s22s.97
s423,247
S164,546
Per OSPI Website
Per OSPI Website
Puget Sound ESD
Puget Sound ESD
Debt Service Capital Levy Rate / S1000 51.04 51.41 Per King Co. Assessor Report
General Obligation Bond lnterest Rate 3.95% 2.t6% Bond Buyers 20 year GO lndex
lmpact Fee - Single Family
lmpact Fee - Multi-Family
SF
MF
ss,ss4
s2,345
S5,692.85
s2,403.63
lncrease of S138.85 or 25%
lncrease of 558.63 or 2.5%
Page 15 of 15
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
Student Generation Factors - Single Family
Elementary (Grades K - 6) 0.334
Middle School (Grades 7 - 8) 0.078
Senior High (Grades I - 12) 0.117
Total 0.529
Projected lncreased Student Gapacity
Student Generation Factors - Multi-Family
Elementary 0.117
Middle School 0.028
Senior High 0.048
Total 0.193
OSPI - Square Footage per Student
Elementary
Middle School
Senior High
Special Education
90
117
130
144
Average Site Cost / Acre
Elementary
Middle School
Senior High
$113,496
$0
$0
Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost
Elementary @ 24
Middle School @ 29
Senior High @ 31
$o
$0
$o
Elementary
Middle School
Senior High (Academy)
New Facility Construction Gost
Elementary *
Middle School
Senior High * (Academy)
* See cost basis on Pg. 26
700
0
480
Required Site Acreage per Facility
Elementary (required)
Middle School (required)
Senior High (required)
11
21
32
$53,000,000
$o
$36,000,000
Temporary Facility Square Footage
Elementary
Middle School
Senior High
Total
143,372
10,736
21,296
5.1o/o 175,404
Permanent Facility Square Footage
Elementary 1,571,558
Middle School 764,809
Senior High 1.048 ,939
Total 94.9o/o 3,385,306
Total Facilities Square Footage
Elementary
Middle School
Senior High
Total
Developer Provided Sites / Facilities
Value
Dwelling Units
State Funding Assistance Gredit
District Funding Assistance Percentage
Gonstruction Cost Allocation
CCA - CosUSq, Ft.
District Average Assessed Value
Single Family Residence
District Average Assessed Value
Multi-Family Residence
Bond Levy Tax Rate/$1,000
Current Rate / 1,000 Tax Rate
General Obligation Bond lnterest Rate
Current Bond lnterest Rate
GPI Inflation Factor
56.96%
$238.22
$426,418
'1,714,930 $177,957
775,545
1.070,235
3,560,710 1.41
0.0014
0
2.160/o
2.50%
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan
0
(APPENDTXA)June 2020
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence
Formula: ((Acres x Cost x Student Generation Factor
Student Factor
A 1 (Elementary) 1 1 $1 13,496 7oo 0.334
A 2 (Middle School) 21 $0 0 0.078
A3 (Senior High) 32 $0 480 0.117
Total 64 $113,496 1,180 o.sFA+
Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence
Formula: ((Fadlity Cost /x Student x
Ratio
$s95.69
$0.00
$0.00
$595.69
$22,835.58B 1 (Elementary)
B 2 (Middle School)
B 3 (Senior High)
$53,000,000
$0
$36,000,000
700
480
0.334
0.078
0.117
0.903
0.984
0.998
0
Required Site Acreage Average Site CosuAcre Facility Capacity
Construction Cost Facilitv CaDacitv Student Factor
Total $89,000,000
Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence (Portables)
Formula: ((Facility Cost /x Student X
C 1 (Elementary)
C 2 (Middle School)
C 3 (Senior High)
/ Total
1.180 0.529 B+
Ratio
$8,757.4s
$31,593.03
$0
$o
$o
$0.00
$0
$0
$0.00
24
29
31
0.334
0.078
0.117
0.097
0.016
o.o2
,dPaulY I g[tPUtdt
Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor
Total $0 84
State Funding Assistance Credit per Single Family Residence (formerly "State Match")
Formula: AreaCostAllowance x SPI Feet student x
0.529
Assistance% x StudentFactor
c+
Student Factor
0.334
0.078
o.117
$4,078.84
$1,238
$2,064
$7,381.00
D 1 (Elementary)
D 2 (Middle School)
D 3 (Senior High)
$238.22
$238.22
$238.22
90
'117
130
0.5696
0.5696
0.5696
DO
Tax Credit per Single Residence
Developer Provided Facility Credit
(Below used to calculate NPW
Current Bond lnterest Rate
Years Amortized (10 Years)- Used in NPV Calculation
2.16%
10
TCo
FC+
$5,351.12
000
Net Present Value (per EQ) (NPV)
Current DebtService Rate/ 1,000 ( r)
$426,418
8.90
SF Residential Assessed Value (AAV)
0.1
Faciliv / Site Value UnitsDwel
Fee Recap
A = SiteAcquisition perSF Residence
B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence
C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence
Subtotal
D = State Match Credit per Residence
TC = Tax Credit per Residence
$595.69
$31,593.03
$0.00
$32,188.72
$7,381.00
$5,351.12
Subtotal
Total Unfunded Need
50% Developer Fee Obligation
FC = Facility Credit (if applicable)
District Adjustment (see page 28 for explanation)
Net Fee Obligation per Residence - Single Family
$12,732.12
$19,456.60
$9,728
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDTX B)
$0
June 2020
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE
Site Acquisition Cost per Multi.Family Residence Unit
x Student Generalion Factor
Required Site Acreage Averaae Site CosuAcre Facilitv CaDacitv Student Factor
Formula: ((Acres x Cost per
A 1 (Elementary)
A 2 (Mlddle School)
A 3 (Senior Hioh)
11
21
32
$1 13,496
$0
$0
0.117
0.028
0.048
$208.67
$0.00
700
0
480
Total 1 13,496 1 .'180 0.1 93A+$208.67
Pe]manent Facility Construction Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit
Formula: ((Facility Cost i x Student
Construction Cost Facility CapaciW Student Factor Footaqs Ratio
B 1 (Elementary) $53,000,000 700 0.117 0.903 $7,999.29
B 2 (Middle School) $0 0 0.028 0.984
B 3 (Senior High) $36,000,000 480 0.048 0.998 _ $3,592.80
Total $89,O0O,OOO 1,180
Temporary Facility Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit
Formula; ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacily) x Student / Total
x / Total Foolage Ratio)
x
Facilitv Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footaqe Ratio
C 1 (Elementary)
C 2 (Middle School)
$0
$o
24
29
31
o.117
0.028
0.048
0.097
0.016
o.o2
$0.00
$0
D 1 (Elemenlary)
D 2 (Middle School)
D 3 (Senior High)
c3
Totat $0 84
State Funding Assistance Credit per Multi-Family Residence (formerly "State Match")
$0.00
Formula: Area Cost Allolvance x SPI Square Feet per student x Fundi Assistance% x StudentFactor
$238.22 90 0.s696 0.117 $1,428.82
$238.22 117 0.5696 0.028 $445
$238.22 130 0.5696 0.048 $847-F-
$2,720.04
Tax Credit per Multi
TC + $2,233.18
(Below used to calculate NPV)
Current Bond Inleresl Rate
Years Amortized (10 Years)- Used in NPV Calculation
Developer Provided Facility Credit
2.16%
10
00 FCo 0
Area Cost Allowanc Fl. IsPt o/o Student Factor
MF Residential Assessed Value (AAV)$r77,957
0.Rate / 1,000
8.90Present Value (per EQ) (NPV)
Debi
Facilitv / Site Value Unils
Fee Recap
A = Site Acquisition per Mulli-Family Unit
B = Permanenl Facility Cost per MF Unit
C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit
D = State Match Credit per MF Unit
TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit
Subtotal
Total Unfunded Need
50% Developer Fee Obligation
FC = Facility Credit (if applicable)
District Adjustment (see page 28 for explanation)
Net Fee Obligation per Residential Unit - Multi-family
$208.67
$1 1,592.09
$0.00
Subtotal
$2,720.O4
$2,233.1 8
$1 1,800.76
$4,953.23
$6,847.53
$3,424
0
Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDTX C)June 2020
,
FEDERAL WAY
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Each Scholar: A voice. A dream. A BRIGHT future.
Mirror Lake
Elementary School
La ke Grove
Elementary School
':,,,,,.,.L!i??#k:i, ;:,r..,,,,.
Wildwood
Elementary School
Thomas
J effe rso n
High School
CAPITAL FACI LITI ES PLAN
202L
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
2021
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
June 5,2020
BOARD OF EDUCATION
Trudy Davis
Hiroshi Eto
Dr. Jennifer Jones
Geoffery McAnalloy
Luckisha Phillips
SUPERINTENDENT
Dr. Tammy Campbell
Prepared by: Sally D. Mcl,ean, Chief Finance & Operations Officer
Jennifer Thomas, Student & Demographic Forecaster
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2O2I CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
SECTION I THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Introduction
lnventory of Educational Facilities
Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities
Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities
Needs Forecast - New Facilities
Six Year Finance Plan
SECTTON 2 MAPS
Introduction
Map - City and County Jurisdictions
SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
Introduction
Building Capacities
Portable Locations
Student Forecast
SECTION 4
I
2-3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
l1
KING COLINTY, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, AND
CITY OF KENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
Introduction
Capacity Summaries
Impact Fee Calculations
Reference to Impact Fee Calculations
Student Generation Rates
Impact Fee Changes from 2020 to 2021
t2
13-l 5
t6-t7
t8-20
2l
22-26
27-28
29-30
31
32
1
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2O2I CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
INTRODUCTION
In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB)
2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King
County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21,1995
as amended, City of Kent Ordinance No.4278 effective June 2018, revised January 2020, and
the City of Auburn Ordinance No. 5078 effective 1998, Federal Way Public Schools has
updated its Capital Facilities Plan as of June 2020.
This plan is scheduled to be submitted for consideration to each of the jurisdictions located
with the Federal Way Public Schools' service area: King County, the City of Kent, City of
Federal Way and the City of Aubum and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each
jurisdiction by reference. This plan is requested to be included in the Facilities Plan element
of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not
adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The City of Des Moines collects school impact fees as
part of the SEPA process. Discussions with the City of Milton to adopt an ordinance for school
impact fees for parcels located within the Federal Way School District's service area is in
process.
The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within
which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted
and recommended to the King County Council for Urban Growth Area Line Maps with
designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area,
which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and
actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing, jobs,
serviceso culture, and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this
underlying assumption.
This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which
requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended
to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim
plans consistent with Board policies or management need.
During the 2016-17 school year the District formed a 100 member Facilities Planning
Committee consisting of parents, community members and staff. The Committee was tasked
with developing a recommendation to the Superintendent regarding Phase 2 of the District's
plan for school construction, remodeling, and/or modemization for voter consideration in
November 2017. The voters passed this $450M bond authorization with a 62%oYES vote
reflecting a commitment to invest in the modernization of our infrastructure. Through the
committee's work a determination was made to rebuild Thomas Jefferson High School,
Illahee Middle School, Totem Middle School, Lake Grove Elementary, Mirror Lake
Elementary, Olympic View Elementary, Star Lake Elementary, and Wildwood Elementary.
In addition to the school projects, the committee included a plan to modernize Memorial
Stadium, which currently supports athletic activities for all schools. The rebuilding of the
schools will create additional capacity for students at the elementary and high school levels.
2
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2O2I CAPTTAL FACILITIES PLAN
INTRODUCTION. continued
The District continues to monitor factors that may have an impact on enrollment and capacity
at our schools, including new single-family and multi-family residential developments and
any impacts due to the COVID-l9 stay home order. In accordance with the McCleary
decision, the State has provided funding to reduce K-3 class size to I7 and 4-12 class size to
25. Beginning in 2019-20 the legislature expects compliance with this funding adding
pressure to the need for elementary capacity. In response to this need the district has
acquired a commercial building to renovate into classrooms to provide permanent additional
capacity.
We will also continue to study school boundaries as new housing and fluctuating populations
impact specific schools. Some shifts in boundaries may be required in the coming years. At
this time with more than 1,000 unhoused elementary students, boundary adjustments cannot
resolve the need for additional capacity.
3
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2O2I CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION 1 - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
The State Gror,vth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to
determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community.
This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and
expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. A Financial Plan that
shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modemization listed follows
this.
4
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2O2I CAPTTAL FACILITIES PLAN
INVENTORY OT' EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (K.5)
Adelaide
Brigadoon
Camelot
Enterprise
Green Gables
Lake Dolloff
Lake Grove
Lakeland
Mark Twain
Meredith Hill
Mirror Lake
Nautilus (K-8)
Olympic View
Panther Lake
Rainier View
Sherwood Forest
Silver Lake
Star Lake
Sunnycrest
Twin Lakes
Valhalla
Wildwood
Woodmont (K-8)
MIDDLE SCHOOLS (6-8)
Federal Way Public Academy (6-10)
Illahee
Kilo
Lakota
Sacajawea
Sequoyah
Totem
TAF @ Saghalie (6-12)
HIGH SCHOOLS (9-12)
Decatur
Federal Way
Thomas Jefferson
Todd Beamer
Career Academy at Truman
ADDITIONAL SCHOOLS
Internet Academy (K-1 2)
Employment Transition Program ( I 2+)
Federal Way Open Doors
Former DeVry Property (K-5)
1635 SW 304ft St
3601 SW 336th St
4041 s 298d'St
35101 5th Ave SW
32607 47ft Ave SW
4200 S 3081h St
303 SW 308'h St
35827 32"d Ave S
2450 S Star Lake Rd
5830 S 300th St
625 S 3l4th St
1000 s 289th st
2626 SW 327tJ,. St
34424I't Ave S
3015 s 368th St
34600 l2e Ave SW
1310 SW 325th Pl
4014 S 270s St
24629 42'd Ave S
4400 sw 320d'st
27847 42"d Ave S
2405 S 300th St
2645416th Ave S
Federal Way
Federal Way
Auburn
Federal Way
Federal Way
Auburn
Federal Way
Auburn
Federal Way
Auburn
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
Kent
Kent
Federal Way
Auburn
Federal Way
Des Moines
98023
98023
98001
98023
98023
98001
98023
98001
98003
98001
98003
98003
98023
98003
98003
98023
98023
98032
98032
98023
98001
98003
98198
34620 9th Ave S
36001 I't Ave S
4400 s 308th st
1415 SW 3l4d'St
l10l S Dash Point Rd
3450 S 360th ST
26630 40ft Ave S
33914l9th Ave SW
2800 sw 320th st
30611 16tr Ave S
4248 S 288th St
35999 16ft Ave S
31455 28ft Ave S
31455 28tr Ave S
33250 2l'tAve SW
31455 28ft Ave S
3600 S 344thWay,
Federal Way
Federal Way
Auburn
Federal Way
Federal Way
Auburn
Kent
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
Auburn
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
98003
98003
98001
98023
98003
98001
98032
98023
98023
98003
98001
98003
98003
98003
98023
98003
98001
5
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2O2I CAPTTAL FACILITIES PLAN
CURRENT INVENTORY NON.INSTRUCTIONAL F'ACILITIES
Developed Propertv
Central Kitchen
Federal Way Memorial Field
Educational Services Center
Support Services Center
t2l4 s 332"d
1300 s 30gth st
33330 8th Ave S
l2ll s332ndst
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
Federal Way
98003
98003
98003
98003
Leased Propertv
Early Leaming Center at Uptown 1066 S 320th St
Square
Undeveloped Pronertv
Federal Way 98003
Site
#
Location
75 SW 360th Street &3rd Avenue SW - 9.2 Acres
65 S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S - 8.8 Acres
60 E of l0th Avenue SW - SW 334th & SW 335ft Streets - 10.04 Acres
73 N of SW 320th and east of 45th PL SW - 23.45 Acres
7l S 344th Street & 46th Avenue S - 17.47 Acres
82 l't Way S and S 342"d St - Minimal acreage
96 S 308th St and l4th Ave S - .36 Acres
Notes:
Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements.
Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in
the District.
6
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2O2I CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES
As part of the multi-phase modernization and replacement plan, the District intends to
increase capacity for elementary and high school students with expansion at the Thomas
Jefferson, Lake Grove, Mirror Lake, Olympic View, Star Lake, and Wildwood sites. Only
projects in Phase II with plans to increase capacity are included in the impact fee calculation
for this plan.
1
PHASE EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF'
F'UNDS
As
needed
Purchase and Relocate
Portables
Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is
Impact Fees.
II Thomas Jefferson High
School
Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
Voter Approved Capital bond
II Illahee Middle School Replace Existins Buildine Voter Approved Capital bond
II Totem Middle School Replace Existing Buildine Voter Approved Capital bond
II Lake Grove Elementary Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
Voter Approved Capital bond
II Mark Twain Elementary Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
TBD, pending SCAP funding
II Mirror Lake Elementary Replace Existing Building,
Increase Caoacitv
Voter Approved Capital bond
II Olympic View K-8 School Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
Voter Approved Capital bond
II Star Lake Elementary Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
Voter Approved Capital bond
II Wildwood Elementary Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
Voter Approved Capital bond
II Memorial Stadium Replace Existine Facilitv Voter Approved Capital bond
II DeVry Property Temp Swing School
Increase Capacitv
SCAP and K-3 Class size
reduction funding
III Decatur High School Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
TBD
III Kilo Middle School Replace Existing Buildine TBD
III Sacaiawea Middle School Replace Existing Buildine TBD
Adelaide Elementary Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
TBD
III Brigadoon Elementary Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacitv
TBD
III Camelot Elementary Replace Existing Building,
Increase Canacitv
TBD
III Lake Dolloff Elementary Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
TBD
III Nautilus K-8 School Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
TBD
III Twin Lakes Elementary Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacitv
TBD
Woodmont K-8 School Replace Existing Building,
Increase Capacity
TBD
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2O2I CAPTTAL FACILITIES PLAN
NEEDS FORECAST - ADDITIONAL FACILITIES
T'ACILITY LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF' I'UNDS
No current plans for additional facilities.
B
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2O2I CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Six Year Finance Plan
Secured Fundmg
Projected Revenue
Actual and Plarned Expenditures
NOTS:
l- Thsefsarceurrenllyb.ingheldinaKiigCounly,CilyofFd6dWay.CilyofAubum,mdCilyofKenlimpaclf€a@unl.andwillbe
.vdlableforus€bylheDistdclforsydemimprovements. Thhbywendbalmceonl28l/19.
2. Ths k y@rend hlsn€ on l13ll19.
3. T his b lhe I 28 l/ 19 balme of bond fuds ud ap ild levy fundr. t hi c fiSre includes inlercil eamirF.
4. thhreprcsenlslhebdm@ducloFWSfionOSPIfor$hoolConsructionAssi$taneProgrilfundsspmtlhrotrghDoimbq3l,20l9.
5. Thh is mt;cipald rcAP for lhe future prcjeG aulhotud by lhe volec in 20l7.lees paymflls rdvd lGdsle
6. This h a seurd K-3 Class saeduclionFtrt.
in school impacl f€celcuhlions.
8. Thercar€nopmj@ldsaleofsurylusprcpdi*.
9. Theseaaprcj@ld f6 bsd uponelicipald rsidenti0l developmmb in lheDiilrict,elimatd at S50,0m permonlhovdlhene! 6 y6E.
10. Prcjet budFlsarc updald d ofApdl 2020ad rcndiveofacld OuMeld PriceMd{muns lbrall bul lllah@Middlc ehool and Olympic VeNK-8
6alemponryhouin& Thes€ossofthesiteaquisilionareincluddinthe sch@liDpactlbqlcnlations
I 2. Thse ks reprdat lhe cos of purchsirS ud inslsllinS new podsbles. The ponable ryenditurc in futurc y dB may rq la@ cisinS ponables rhar arc not functiond.
Th6emay nol ircEBeepeity ed aenor includd inthe€peity summary.
9
Somes
wsffioor-s
2021-22 2422-23 2023-2t tn2[2]75
$861t m
s9 145ffi sld-l00r0t
s53mffi ss3i00r0t
$l? 571 ffi
s80300i0(
g s(
24
$?m m s?mffi s2m ffi $tmffi qmm sfn0n0f
$561.771r7t
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2O2T CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION 2 - MAPS
Federal Way Public Schools has twenty-one elementary schools (grades K-5), two schools
with a K-8 grade configuration, six middle school schools (grades 6-8), four high schools
(grades 9-12) and four small secondary schools. The Federal Way Public Academy serves
students in grades 6-10. The programs at Open Doors and Career Academy at Truman High
School serves students in grades 9-12. In additi6n to these programs, TAF@Saghalie serves
students in grades 6-12 who reside within the service area and the Employment and Transition
Program (ETP) at the Norman Center serves 18-21year old scholars.
The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility
infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public
facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that
development. School districts are different. If the district does not have permanent facilities
available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries
can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities.
It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction
of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the
district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around
a single development.
Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the district and is not taken lightly. It
is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools.
Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school.
The final map included represents the city and county boundaries which overlap with the
district's service areas.
o City of Algona
. City of Auburn
o City of Des Moines
. City of Federal Way. City of Kent
o City of Milton
o Unincorporated King County
10
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2O2I CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
MAP _ CITY AND COUNTY JURISDICTIONS
fr FEDERAL WAY
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Erch Sehole.: A !stc€. A d.erm. A lRl€HT future.
"-F'
'o 0.5 I
City and County
f u risd ictions
Des
Kent
Auburn
Prgef Souod
Federal
Algona
Milton
2 Miles
11
FWPS boundaries is 100% Urban Growth Area
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2O2I CAPTTAL FACILTTIES PLAN
SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
Building Capacities - The Education Program
Portable Locations
Student Forecast - 2021 through 2027
I2
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2O2I CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
BUILDING CAPACITIES
This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's oostandard of service" in order to
ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction
establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into
consideration the education program needs.
In general, the District's current target class size provides that the average class size for a
standard classroom for grades K through 3 should be 17 students to comply with current
legislation. In grades 4-5 the target is 25 students. For grades 6to 12 the target class size is 26
students. Classrooms for students with Individualized Education Program (Special Education)
needs are calculated at 12 seats per classroom.
Historically, the District has used the OSPI square footage calculation as a baseline for
capacity calculation and made adjustments for specific program needs. The District will
continue to use this calculation for determining capacity at our middle and high schools.
However, for elementary schools capacity will be calculated based on the number of
classroom spaces and the number of students assigned to each classroom.
Class Size
Guidelines
FWPS Historical
"Standard of Service"
HB2661lSH82776
Enacted Law
Square Footage
Guideline
Kindergarten 18.9 l7 25-28
Grades I -2 18.9 l7 2s-28
Grade 3 18.9 t7 28
Grades 4-5 25 25 28
For the purposes of determining student capacity at individual schools, the following list
clarifies adjustments to classroom spaces and the OSPI calculation.
Special Education Resource Rooms:
Each middle school requires the use of a standard classroom(s) for special education students
requiring instruction to address specific disabilities.
English as a Second Language Programs:
Each middle school and high school requires the use of a standard classroom for students
learning English as a second language.
Middle School Computer Labs:
Each middle school has computer labs, except Totem Middle School. Wireless access has
been installed at all secondary schools. Ifadditional classroom space is needed, these
computer labs may be converted to mobile carts.
13
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2O2I CAPTTAL FACILITIES PLAN
BUILDING CAPACITIES, continued
High School Career Development and Learning Center (Resource) Room:
Each high school provides special education resource room and career
development classrooms for students requiring instruction to address specific
disabilities.
P resch oollEC EAP/IIead start:
Our district currently offers preschool programs for both special needs &
typically developing students at 9 elementary schools. We also have ECEAP and
Headstart program at l0 sites (4 elementary schools, I middle school, 2 high schools,
and 2 commercial sites). These programs decrease capacity at those schools.
Alternative Learning Experience:
Federal Way offers students the opportunity to participate in an Altemative
Learning Experience through our Internet Academy. These students have never been
included in the capacity calculation of unhoused students.
1418 Youth Reengagement:
Federal Way offers students the opportunity to participate in 1418 Youth
Reengagement Open Doors program. These students are housed at the Truman
campus but are not currently included in the capacity calculation of unhoused
students.
1,4
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2O2I CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
BUILDING CAPACITIES, continued
ELEN4U{TARYBT]ILDING
PROGRAMCAPACITY
Eementary Arrcrage 403
MIDDLE S CHOOL BTJILDING
PROGRAMCAPACITY
HIGIISCHOOL BT]ILDING
PROGRAMCAPACITY
2High School Average lJos
Notes:
lPreschoolenrolhnentreducescapacityforK-5students. l5preschoolstudentsinoneclassroorn
2Federal Way Public Academy, Career Academy at Trunnn High School, and Enployment Transition Program
and TAF @ Saghalie for the high school school grade span (9-12) are non-boundary schools. These schools are not used in the
calculated averages.
' lake Crove and Wildwood are scheduled to open January 2}2l:MmorLake is scheduled to open September 2021
School Nanre Headcount lPreschool
Adelaide 353 30
Brisadoon 299 30
Camelot 277 30
Entemrise 345 15
Crreen Cables 401
take Dolloff 400
't ke c,roue 600
lakeland 371
MarkTwain 430
Meredith Hill 375 30
3Mirror I ake 600
Nautilus (K-8)466
Olynpic View 3s3
Panther lake 347
Rainier View 40s 30
Sherwood Forest 390 6
Silver take 400
Star take 337
Sunnvcrest 405
Twin takes 341 30
Valhalla 406
3wildwood 600 30
Woodmont (K-8)357
TOTAL 9258 231
School Nanre Headcount
Illahee 855
Kilo 779
[-akota 786
Sacaiawea 694
Seouovah 585
Totem 795
TAF @ Saghalie s98
Federal Wav Public Academv 183
TOTAL 5,275
*Middle School 727
School Name Headcount
Decatur 1243
Federal Way 1684
Thomas Jefferson 1224
Todd Beanrer r085
TAF @. Sashalie 15s
Career Academy at Truman r59
Federal Way Public Academy u6
Employment Trans ition Program 48
TOTAL 5.114
15
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2O2I CAPTTAL FACTLITIES PLAN
PORTABLE LOCATIONS
The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education.
It is not an efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students
due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from
year to year.
Portables are used as interim measures to house students when increasing population impacts
a school attendance area. Portables may also be required to house students when new or
changing programs require additional capacity. They also provide housing for students until
permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. When permanent facilities become
available, the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or child care
programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables may not be
fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy
new portables and surplus these unfit portables.
With the launch of construction of new schools, a number of portables will be relocated,
decommissioned, or sold. These numbers are not available at this time.
The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for educational
facilities by Federal Way Public Schools.
1,6
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2O2I CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
INSTRUCTIONAL
NON
INSTRUCTIONAL
Adelaide 7 1
Brigadoon 1
Camelot 1
Enterprise 3
Creen Csbles I
I-ake Dolloff 4 1
Lake C-rrove
Lakeland
Mark Twain 3
Meredith Hill 3
Minor [-ake
Nautilus 3
Olympic View 2
Panther Lake 4
Rainier View 5
Sherwood Forest 2 2
Silver Iake 1 3
Star Iake
Sunnycrest 6
Twin Iakes 1 2
Valhalla 4
Wildwood
Woodmont 3
TOTAL 49 9
PORTABLES LOCATU)
AT H.WIU'{TARYSCHOOLS
PORTABLES LOCATH)
AT MIDDLESCHOOLS
PORTABLE LOCATIONS, continued
PORTABLES LOCATU)
AT HIGH SCHOOLS
INSTRUCTIONAL
NON
INSTRUCTIONAL
Decatur 8
Federal Way
Thomas Jefferson 6
Todd Beamer 8
TOTAL 22
PORTABLES LOCATTX)
AT ST]PPORT F'ACILITMS
MOT
TDC 9
Former TAFA
TOTAL 9
DISTRICT PORTABLES IN USE FOR ECEAP
AND/OR HEADSTART
Sherwood Forest 1
Totem
Total 1
INSTRUCTIONAL
NON
INSTRUCTIONAL
Illahee 2 1
Kilo I 6
Lakota
Sacaiawea 4
Sequoyah 2
Totem
TAF@ Saehalie 4
TOTAL 13 7
r'7
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2O2I CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
STUDENT FORECAST
Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment
projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The
majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students.
Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected
enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to
enrollment projections.
Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department.
Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals, grade level
and program level to include vocational and special education students.
The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of
a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a
stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical
information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not
trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The
district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study
several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student
migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades
(kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on
birth rates within the district's census tracts and treats these statistics as a cohort for
kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years.
The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student
enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below.
The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are
forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years
of historical information and how they are weighted.
A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows
the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections
for the district level. The Enrollment MasterrM software provides statistical methods
including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods.
This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment.
In February 2018, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the
Federal Way School District. The report was complete in March 2018. The model used to
forecast next year's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth,
assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county-wide average),
assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast
was provided as a range of three projections. The long-range forecast provided with this
report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes
in the 5-19 age group for King County.
1B
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2O2I CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
STUDENT FORECAST, continued
Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a
constant percent of something else (e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some
projected trend for the school-age population over time. The report included 5 different
calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2026. This
model produces a projection that is between 21,500 and 25,000 when applied to the low,
medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning
and is consistent with estimates from various models.
Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort
survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the
projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied
annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they
project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by
Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the
projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington.
Near term projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by current
local economic conditions. The District tracks new development from five permitting
jurisdictions. Long range planning assumes a student yield from proposed new housing
consistent with historical growth patterns.
Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The
Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions
comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school
district community in the future.
In school year 2018-19, King County as a whole experienced unusual enrollment patterns.
We continue to monitor this closely.
I9
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2O2I CAPTTAL FACILITIES PLAN
Calendar Yr
STUDENT FORECAST, continued
October 1 Head Count Enrollment History and Projections
Excludes Full-time Running Start and Open Doors Enrollment
School Year Fleme Middle School School Total K-12
20t4
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2U4
2025
2026
2027
2013-14
2014-15
20t5-16
2016-17
2017-t8
2018-19
20t9-20
82020-21
P2021-22
P2022-23
P2023-24
P2024-25
P2025-26
P2026-27
21,778
21,754
21,995
21,933
21,915
21,716
21,584
21,593
21,723
21,940
22,181
22,359
22,537
22,808
%
1.1%
0.0%
0.6%
L0%
1.1%
0.8%
1.6%
0%
10,131 4,848 6,799
9,998 4,931 6,825
10,206 s,094 6,69s
t0,424 5,033 6,476
10,418 5,159 6,338
10,158 5,115 6,443
9,953 5,309 6,322
9,887 5,336 6,370
9,946 5,369 6,409
10,046 5,422 6,472
10,156 5,481 6,543
10,238 5,525 6,596
10,319 5,569 6,649
10,443 5,636 6,729
Elemmtary K-5 Middle School 6-8 High School 9-12
%
22,500
Enrollment HiSory and Six Year Forecast
22,000
21,500
21,000
20,500
20,000 uE u'e uE u'"^ "'^^ \ u'g nu, qu u\ uu,
School Year
r#R..
*2020-21 projections from SM projections, brick and mortar schools. Does not include altemative (IA, ETP, PTC, Support).
Does include Truman.
20
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2O2I CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION 4 - KING COUNTY. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY. AI{D CITY OF KENT
IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
Capacity Summaries
Site & Construction Costs Allocations
Student Generation Rates
Impact Fee Calculations
Reference to Impact Fee Calculations
2I
FEDERAL WAY PUBLTC SCHOOLS 2O2I CAPTTAL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACITY SUMMARIES
All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and High Schools
The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information, Portable Capacity
information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements
for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary
facilities or interim measures.
The District has recently adjusted its capacity calculation method for Elementary schools to
better show capacity needed to comply with the K-3 Class Size Reduction. This adjustment is
also shown in the portable capacity calculation. In order to allow for flexibility in portable
usage the District will use an average class size calculation of 2l for each Elementary portable
and an average class size of 25 for each Middle and High School portable.
The information is organized with a page summarizingthe entire District, and then evaluating
capacity vs. number of students at elementary, middle school, and high school levels
individually.
The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in
place each year.
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2O2I CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued
Capacity Summary - All Grades
CAPACITY
A\IROLLMM{T
Budeet -- Proiected--
Calendar Year 2021 2022 2023 2024 202s 2026 2027
School Year 2020-21 2021-22 2m2-23 2023-24 202+25 2025-26 2026-27
BI.NLDINGPROGR.AM
TMADCOUNT CAPACITY
Add Capacity
19,434
571
20,005
237
20,242
138
20,380
6W
21,077
0
21,077
0
21,077
0
Adiusted Program Headcount Capacity 20,005 20,242 20,380 21.077 21.077 21.077 21.077
Bas ic Headcount Enrollrnent
Intemet Academy Headcount Enrollmentl
Basic FTEEnrollment without Intemet Acadenry
21,593
(2ss)
21,338
21,723
(2ss)
21,M8
21,940
(2ss)
21,685
22,181
(2ss)
21.926
22,359
Qss)
22.104
22,537
(2ss)
22.282
22,808
(2ss)
22.553
SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSU))
PROGRAMF'TECAPACITY (1.333)(L2261 (1305)(849)0.027\(1.205)0.4761
RUJOCATABLECAPACITY
SURPLUS OR(U|IHOIFU))
PROGRAM AND REI./OCATAB I,E
CAPACITY s96 428 349 763 s35 357 86
NOTES:
1 Intemet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full tirne use of school facilities.
Current Portable Capacity
Add/Subtract Portable Capacity
2,360
(431)
r.929
1,929
(27s)
1.654
1,654
0
1.654
1,654
(42)
1"612
1,612
(s0)
t.562
1,562
0
1.562
1,562
0
1.562Adiusted Portab le Capacity
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2O2I CAPITAL FACILTTIES PLAN
CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued
Capacity Summary - Elementary Schools
CAPACITY
E\ROLLME\T
Budset Proiected
Calendar Year 2ml 2m2 2023 2024 2025 2026 247
School Year 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 20n-24 2024-25 2025-26 202647
BTJILDINGPROGRAM
HEAD COI]NT CAPACITY
Add/Subtract capacity total
Add capacity atr:
Lake Grove
Mirror Lake
Star Lake
Wildwood
De l/ry
Olympic View K-8
8,M5
571
247
196
128
9,016
0
9,016
138
138
9,154
697
697
0
9,851
0
9,85 I
0
9,851
0
Adiusted Proeram Headcount Capacitv 9,016 9.016 9.154 9.851 9.85 I 9.851 9.851
Bas ic Headcount Enrollment
Internet Academy Headcount2
Basic Headcount Enrolknent without Intemet Academy
q887
9.867
(20)
9,946
9.926
(20)
10,046
10.026
(20)
I 0,156
(20)
10.136
(20)
rc,n8
10.218
10,319
(20)
r0.299
(20)
10,443
10.423
STJRPLUS OR(UNHOUSD)
PROGRAMCAPACITY 448
R"U,OCATAB LE CAPACTI i,
NOTES:
Capacity increases are pro-jected based on a design to accommodate 600 students - as design is completed these may be
adjusted in future iterations ofthis plan. Increased capacity is cunently stated as the difference between current calculated
capacity and the projected design.
2InternetAcademystudentsareincludedinprojectionsbutdonotrequirefulltimeuseofschoolfacilities.
3 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number ofportables available and other administrative techniques which
can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only
The actual number ofportables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs.
The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables
will determine feasibility for continued instructional use.
24
Current Portable Capacity
Add/Subtract portable capacity
Add portable capacity at'.
Subtract portable capacity at:
Lake Grove
Mirror Lake
Star Lake
Wldwood
Olympic View K-8
1,260
(23r)
(2 1)
(r 26)
(84)
I,U9
0
\me
0
1,029
(421
(42)
987
0
987
0
987
0
Adiusted Portable Caoacitv 1-029 1.029 1.029 987 987 987 987
SURPLUS OR(U|{HOUSU))
PROGRAM AND R"U-OCATABLE
CAPACITY t78 tt9 157 702 620 539 415
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2O2I CAPTTAL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued
Capacity Summary - Middle Schools
CAPACITY
A\ROLLMA\T
Budeet -- Proiected--
Calendar Year 2021 2W2 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
School Year 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-2s 2025-26 2026-27
BUILDINGPROGRAM
HEADCOUNT CAPACITY
Add/Subtract capacity
Add capacity at:
Totemt
Illahee
5,275
0
5,275
0
5,275
0
5,275
0
5,275
0
5,275
0
5,275
0
5.275 5.275 5.275 5.275 s,275 5,275 5,275Adiusted Program Headcount Capacity
Basic Headcount Enrollment
Intemet Academy2
Basic Enrollrnent without Intemet Academy
5,336
(ss)
5.281
5,368
(55)
5.313
5,422
5.367
(55)
5,481
(s5)
5.426
5,525
5-470
(55)
5,569
(5s)
5,514
5,636
(55)
5,581
SURPLUS ORGTNHOUSU))
PROGRAMCAPACITY (6)(38)(B2r flsl)(l9s)(2391 (306)
RU,OCATABLECAPACTTt'
NOTES:
I Totem and Illahee Middle Schools currently have capacity for 800 & 850 students respectively, so no new capacity
is anticipated with the rebuild of this older buildings.
2 Intemet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities.
3 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which
can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only.
The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs.
The District may begin to pull portables flomthe instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables
will determine feasibility for continued instructional use.
Current Portable Capacity
Add/Subtract portable capacity
Totem Middle School
Sacajawea Middle School
Illahee Middle School
Adiusted Portable Capacity
4s0
(100)
350
(25l
325
0
325
0
325
(s0)
275
0
275
0
(r 00)
350
(2s)
325 325 325
(s0)
275 275 275
SURPLUS OR(LNHOUSD)
PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE
CAPACITY 344 287 233 174 80 36 (31)
25
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2O2I CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued
Capacity Summary - High Schools
CAPACITY
E\ROLLMU{T
Budset -- Proiected--
Calendar Year 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
School Year 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2W5-26 202G27
BUILDINGPROGRAM
HEADCOT]NT CAPACITY
Add/Subtract capacity
Thomas Jffirson High Schoola
5,714
0
5,714
237
6,188
0
6,r88
0
6,r88
0
6,r88
0
6,188
0
5-714
237
6.188 6,188 6 188 6,188 6,188 6,188Adiusted Proeram Headcount Caoacitv
Bas ic Headcount Enrollrnent
Intemet Academyl
Basic Rl without lntemet Academy
6,370
(180)
6,190
6,408
(r80)
6,228
6,472
(r 80)
6.292
6,543
(180)
6.363
6,596
(180)
6.416
6,&9
(180)
6.469
6,728
(r80)
6.548
SURPLUS OR(I.INHOUSD)
PROGRAMCAPACITY (4761 (40)fl04)(175)028\(281)(360)
RAOCATABLECAPAC.ITf
SIIRPLUS ORGTNHOUSED)
PROGRAM AND RU-OCATABLE
CAPACITt'74 260 196 125 72 19 (60)
NOTES:
l. Intemet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities.
2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which
can be used to tenrporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only
The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs.
The District rnay begin to pull portables fromthe instructional inventory. Age and condition ofthe portables
will determine feasibility for continued instructional use.
3. Capacity for unhoused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and
no planning time in some classrooms.
4 Cunent project timelines estimate the completion of Thomas Jefferson HS opening in the fall of 2A2.
Current Portable Cap acity
Add/Subtract portable capacity
Thomas Jeferson High Schooll
Adiusted Portable Capacity
650
000)
550
(2s0)
300
0
300
0
300
0
300
0
300
0
Q00)
550
(2s0)
300 300 300 300 300 300
z6
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2O2I CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
Single and Multi-Family Residences
Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to
help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities.
To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was
established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substantially
adopted by the City of Auburn, Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to
establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to
a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard
construction costs, which are unique to that district.
Impact Fee Calculation
On page 30, the 2021 vaiables for the calculation of the Impact Fee for single family and
multi-family units based on King County Code 21A and the Growth Management Act,
generate the results below:
Plan Year 2020 PlanYear 2021
Single Family Units
Multi-Family Units
Mixed-Use Residential'
$5,035
$20,768
$I 384
$3,243
$16,003
$8 I
Impact Fee Calculation - King County Code 2lA
The Impact Fees have changed as a result of changes in several factors. The updates made to
the variables in the Impact Fee calculation, generate a change in the Impact Fee between the
2020 Capital Facilities Plan and the202l Capital Facilities Plan. A summary of these changes
can be found on page 32 and a yeff over year comparison of formula variables can be found
on page 33.
I In accordance with the City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249.
2l
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS, continued
Impact Fee Calculations
School Site Acquisition Cost:
Facility
Elementary
Middle School
High School
School Construction Cost:
o/oPermFac./
Elementary
Middle School
High School
Temporary Facility Cost:
%o Temp Fac.
Total Ft
Cost / Facility
Facility Facility
Facility
Cost
Facilitv
Student
Factor
Student
Factor
SFR
Student
Factor
SFR
Student
Factor
SFR
Student
Factor
Student
Factor
MFR
TOTAL
Student
Factor
MFR
Student
Factor
MFR
Total
TOTAL
Cost/
Cost/
SFR
Cost/
SFR
Cost/
SFR
Cost/
Cost/
MFR
Cost/
MFR
Cost/
MFR
Elementary
Middle School
High School
School Construction Assistance Program Credit Calculation
ConstructionCost Sq. Ft. State
Ft Student Match
Elementary
Middle School
High School
Tax Payment Credit Calculation
Average Assessed Value (April 2019)
Capital Bond Interest Rate (April 2020)
Net Present Value ofAverage Dwelling
Years Amortized
Property Tax Levy Rate
Present Val ue ofRevenue Stream
Mitigation Fee Summary
Site Acquisition Cost
Permanent Facility Cost
Temporary Facility Cost
State Match Credit
Tax Payment Credit
Sub-Total
50% Local Share
rIn accordance with the City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249
2ln accordance with the City of Kent Ordinance N o. 4278, rev l/20
Single FamilsMulti-Family Mixed-Use
Residences BC$lgrc Residentialr
IOTAL
$ 1,193 $
$ 16,037 $
$$
$ (4,488) $
$ (6,257) $
3,340
43,299
(12,082)
(2,ss2)
$
$
$
$
$
SFR MFR
3,340
43,299
(12,082)
(2,ss2)
$
$
6,485 $ 32,005 $
3,243 $ 16,003 $
32,005
16,003
Calculated Impact Fee $ 3.243 $ 16.003 $ 8.001
Citv of Kent Impact Fee2 $ 3.243 S 9.193
s 1 .193 s3_340
$0 $0
11.97 $384,077 697 0.1 809
0.0691
0.0987
0.5064
0.2523
0.2523 $0 $0
$ I,193 $3J40
94.09%
97.26%
96.98Vo
$39,486,883
$ 16.236.550
709
237
0. l 809
0.0691
0.0987
$e
0.2s23
0.2523
$26.s37
$ 16.763
$16.037 $43.299
$0 s0
$0 $02.
3.
5.91 0.1 809
0.0691
0.0987
0.5064
0.2523
0.2523 $0 $0
$0 $0
$2.s 10 s7.026
$0 $0
$238.22
$238.22
s238.22
90
t30
64.71%
64.71%
64.7lo/"
0. I 809
0.0691
0.0987
0.5064
0.2523
0.2523 $ I .978 $s.0s6
$4,488 $12,082
$383,1 89
2-44o/"
$3,364,1 16
t0
s1.86
s1s6,304
2.44%
81,372,234
10
$1.86
s6.257 s2.552
2B
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2O2I CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
REFERENCES TO IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
SCHOOL ACQUISITION COST
The district purchased the former Devry Technical School building to house displaced
scholars during school construction then will provide permanent capacity for Early
Childhood Education programs.
SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COST
With voter approval of the $450,000,000 bond package, design work is underway for six of
the approved projects. Anticipated construction budgets (based on the Guaranteed
Maximum Price or GMP) have been updated to reflect the final construction contracts. In
addition, a credit for the cost of new construction is incorporated to recognize the K-3 Class
Size Reduction Grant obtained by Federal Way Public Schools. The following table
outlines the facility cost included in the impact fee calculation:
Two additional projects are within this horizon, but not yet included - Olympic View K-8
and Mark Twain Elementary. These costs will be incorporated into future Capital Facilities
Plans. Current Middle School capacity calculations do not reflect unhoused students, so no
costs associated with Illahee Middle School or Totem Middle School are included.
Elementary
Schools
Lake
Grove
Mirror
Lake Star Lake Wildwood
Elementary
TOTAL
Permanent
Capacity 353 404 387 472 t6t6
New Capacity 600 600 525 600 2325
Increased
Caoacitv aso/o 43.9o/o
GMP $28.874.876 $29.833.964 $29.091.582 s28.63s.988 $116.436.410
Proportionate
Share $ 51,085,034
K-3 Class Size
Credit ($ I1,598,151)
Net
Proportionate
Share
$ 39,486,883
29
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2O2I CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Consistent with the capacity calculations described earlier, the District uses the OSPI square
footage calculation for determining capacity at our secondary schools. Based on this
methodology, the following construction costs for Thomas Jefferson High School are
allocated as the proportionate share:
REFERENCES TO IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS, continued
Square Footage Capacity at 130 sq. ft.
Cunent: I79,ll9 1378
Planned: 210.000 1615
Increased CapaciW 237
Increase as o/o t7.24%
GMP s94.176.828
Proportionate Share $ 16.236.550
The District will use the above formulas created as a base for future Capital Facilities Plans
during the life of the current bond authorization. The capacity of these schools may vary
from year to year as programs are added or changed and construction cost may increase over
time.
FACILITIES CAPACITY
Permanent Facility Capacity:
Changes to the Building Program Capacities calculation are found on page 15.
Capacity Summaries:
The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the
capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current
buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found
on pages 22-26.
Student Generation Factor Analysis:
Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined
separately for single-family units and multi-family units. The factors used in
the 2021 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors
from single-family units and multi-family units that were constructed in the
District in the last five (5) years and can be found on the next page
Temporary Facility Cost:
The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or
new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on pages 16 and
17,
30
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
STUDENT GENERATION RATES
New Construction in Prior 5 Years
Single Family Student CFnention
Num rer of Number of Number of Nuil 16t of Elemenfaru l{idh School Total
rmilv EIementatu Middle Schdol Hldh chaal Shr.lenf Sftr.lanl Stur.lent Student
DET/ELOPMENT Dwe nds Sludenl3 Sftrdenlg Factor Factor Factot Fa ctor
'18-R6t€al Meadows 4 t 5 0.o714 0.0357 0.0893 0.1 964
18-Wvncrcst ll A1 5 'l 4 o.1220 o.0244 0.0976 o.2440
1A-SolrnalUcs Manor 21 2 1 1 0.0952 0.0476 0.0476 0.1904
17-Eaole Manor 't2 4 1 1 0.0833 0.0833 0.4999
17-LakehaEn Estates 13 0 I I o 0000 0 0769 0 0769 0't538
17-Hibbicrd Glen '15 7 4 4 O 2t667 o 2667 o2667 1 0001
17-Vista Pointe 105 24 8 't0 o2286,o 0762 0 0952 o 4000
16-Jefferson Place 11 2 o 5455 o 1a1g o ocog o Rla,
16-Star Lake East 30 3 1 o Iooo o 0333 o Io00 o 2333
Tola I 304 55 21
0-{809 o 0691 o o9a7 O 3/ln7
Multi-Family Student Gnemtion - City of FedemlWay
Number of Number of Number of Number ot Elementaru Mlddle School Hloh School Tota I
Multi Familv E|ementarv Mlddle School Hioh School Student Stud6nt Sludent Siudent
DEVELOPMENT Dwellinqs Students Studenta Studonta Factor Fa c-tor Fa clor Fa ctor
f17) Uotom Souare 308 114 7 o 3701 o 2305 o 2435 o 4441
l17l Kitt's Comer 216 161 o 7454 o 2aa5 o 2645 1 te)a
l16l Kandila Tomhomes 27 4 o 1441 o 370,/4 o t)22 o.7407
Tota I 551 279
o 50at o 2823 o.2523 1.0109
* Student Generation Ete is based on totals
31
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2O2I CAPTTAL FACILITIES PLAN
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2O2O TO 2O2I
Item From/To Comment
PercentofPerrnanentFacilities 95.10%to96.110/o Report#3 OSPI
Percent Temporary Facilities 4.90% to 3.89oh Updated portable inventory
Construction Cost Al location $225.97 to5238.22 Change effective July2020
State Match 65.59%to 64.71o/o Change effective July 2020
Average Assessed Value Per Puget Sound Educational
Service District (ESD 121)SFR- $367,890 to $383,189
N{FR- $133,215 to $156,304
Capital Bond Interest Rate 4.09%to2.440 Market Rate
Property Tax kvy Rate $1.86 to $1.86 King County Treasury Division
Average Cost of Portable
Classrooms
Student Generation Factors
Single-Family
Elementary
Middle School
High School
Multi-Family
$189,941 to $169,579 Updated 5-yr rolling average of
portables purchased and placed
by2016.
Impact Fee
.1793 to.1809
.0897 to .0691
.1386 to.0987
Elementary .5853 to.5064
Middle School .2938to.2523
High School .31 16 to .2523
Updated Hous ing Inventory
Note : Student generation factors for our
single family units are based on new
developments constructed within the District
over the lastfive (5) years prior to the date
ofthe fee calculation.
Student generationfactors for are multi-
family units are bqsed on new developments
constructedwithin the District over the last
Jive (5)years prior to the date ofthefee
calculation.
SFR based on the updated calculation
MFR based on the updated calculation
SFR based on the updated calculation
MFR maximum per City of Kent
Ordinance No. 4278, rev ll20
SFR- $5,035 to $3,243
MFR - $20,768 to $16,003
SFR- $5,035 to $3,243
MFR - $8,386 to $90193
City of Kent
5Z
FEDERAL WAY
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Each Scholar: A voice. A dream. A BRIGHT future.
In an environment of high expectations, high support, and no
excuses, the staff of Federal Way Public Schools will continually
learn, lead, utilize data, and collaborate to ensure our scholars
have a voice, a dream, and a bright future.
THE EARLY YEARS WHOLE CHILD ACTIVE LEARNERS
CONTENT-AREA
COMPETENCE
PERSISTENCE TO
GRADUATION
This document is published by the Business Services Department of the Federal Way Public Schools. May 2020
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES
PLAN
2020 through 2026
Adopted by the Auburn School District
Board of Directors
June 22, 2020
SCHOOL DISTRICT
ENGAGE . EDUCATE . EMPOWER
SCHOOL DISTRICT
ENGAGE . EDUCATE. EMP()WER
915 Fourth Street NE
Auburn, Washington 98002
(253) e31-4e00
Serving Students in:
Unincorporated King County
City of Auburn
City of Algona
City of Kent
City of Pacific
City of Black Diamond
BOARD of DIRECTORS
Laurie Bishop
Arlista Holman
Sheilia Mclaughlin
Laura Theimer
Ryan Van Quill
Dr. Alan Spicciati, Superintendent
Table of Contents
Section I Executive Summary Page 1
Section ll Enrollment Projections Page 6
Section lll Standard of Service Page 12
Section lV lnventory of Facilities Page 20
Section V Pupil Capacity.Page 24
Section Vl Capital Construction Plan.
Section Vll lmpact Fees Page 31
Section Vlll Appendices.Page 36
AppendixA.l - Capital Facilities Plan Projections Page 38
Appendix A.2 - Student Generation Survey Page 40
Auburn School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2020 through 2026
Section I
Executive Summary
Auburn School District No.40B
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2020 through 2026
l. Executive Summary
This six-year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Auburn
School District (the "District") as the District's principal planning document, in compliance
with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and the adopted
ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This Plan was prepared
using data available in the spring of 2020.
This Plan is consistent with prior longterm capital facilities plans adopted by the District.
However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District's needs. The
District may prepare interim and periodic long-range Capital Facilities Plans consistent
with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period;
other factors and trends in the use of facilities; and other needs of the District as may be
required. However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this six-year Capital
Facilities Plan.
To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and
within the City of Auburn and City of Kent; the King County Council, the City of Auburn
and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction's
respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of
Algona, Pacific, and Black Diamond, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and
adopt school impact fee ordinances.
Pursuant to the requirements of the GroMh Management Act and the local ordinances,
this Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s)
adjusted accordingly.
The Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's
current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public lnstruction
establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for
the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school
impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the
District's specific needs. ln general, the District's current standard provides that class
size for grades K-3 should not exceed 17 students and class size for grades 4-5 should
not exceed 27 students. When averaged over the six elementary school grades, this
computes to 20.33 students per classroom. Class size for grade 6 should not exceed 27
students and class size for grades 7 and 8 should not exceed 28.53 students. When
averaged over the three middle school grades, this computes to 28.02 students per
classroom. Class size for 9-12 should not exceed 28.74 students, with some subject
areas restricted to lesser numbers. Decisions by current legislative actions may create
the need for additional classrooms. (See Section lll for more specific information.)
The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service
and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The District's
2
2019-20 capacity was 13,997. The actual number of individual students was 17,300 as
of October 1,2019. (See Section V for more specific information.)
The Capital Construction Plan shown in Section Vl addresses the additions and
proposed modernization to the District's existing facilities. The plan includes the
replacement of five elementary schools and one middle school, construction of two new
elementary schools, and acquisition of future school sites to accommodate growth. The
new facilities are required to meet the projected elementary school class size reductions
mandated by the State of Washington and student population increases generated by
the large development areas within the Auburn School District. Three areas that have
significant impact on the school district are the Lakeland South, Lea Hill, and the valley
areas of the district. There are also other development pockets that impact the District.
The District completed a comprehensive review of all district facilities in October 2008.
A Steering Committee made recommendations to the Board for capital improvements to
existing facilities and replacement of seven schools over the next ten years. These
recommendations led to a capital improvements levy and a bond issue that was placed
on the ballot in March 2009. Both ballot measures were unsuccessful in March. The
Board determined to rerun only the capital improvements levy in November 2009, which
the voters approved.
ln the fall of 2011, the Board determined to move forward with the Auburn High School
Modernization and Reconstruction Project and placed the project before the voters in
February of 2012. The bond issue was supported by the community at nearly 57o/o
approval rate, but was short of the super majority requirement of 60%. ln March of
2012, the Board determined to rerun the bond in November of 2Q12. ln November 2012,
the bond passed at62%. The project was completed during the summer of 2016.
ln the spring of 2016, the Board determined to move forward with the replacement of six
schools and the construction of two new elementary schools. The project was placed
before the voters in November 2016 and the bond passed at 62.83%. The first of the
projects, the replacement of Olympic Middle School, started construction in May 2018
and opened in Fall 2019. Construction of new Elementary School#15 started in May
2019 and construction for the replacement of Dick Scobee Elementary School started in
June 2019. Both schools will open in Fall 2020. Construction of new Elementary School
#16 and construction of the replacement Pioneer Elementary School started May 2020.
The School lmpact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the
City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the
fiscal impacts incurred by a district experiencing groMh and development. Section Vll
sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multi-family dwelling
units. The student generation factors have been developed using the students who
actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and multi-family
developments constructed in the last five years. There have been dramatic changes in
the student generation factors for single and multi-family in the past five years. The
District plans to carefully monitor the numbers over the next several years to determine if
this is a trend or an anomaly. The method of collecting the data is with the use of GIS
mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County GlS, data from Davis
Demographics and integration of the mapping with student data from the District's
student data system. This method gives the District actual student generation numbers
for each grade span for identified developments. This data is contained in Appendix A.3.
3
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2020 through 2026
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2019 Capital Facilities Plan that
are a part of the 2020 Plan. The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference.
Section I
Executive SummaryA. Updated to reflect new information within the PlanB. Summary level list of changes from previous year
Section ll
Enrollment ProjectionsA. Updated projections. See Section ll & Appendices A.1
Section lll
Standard of ServiceA. Updated to reflect current number of classrooms allocated to non-standard classroom uses
Section lV
Inventory of FacilitiesA. Add 1 portable at Washington Elementary School.B. Add 1 portable at Cascade Middle School.C. Add 4 portables at Olympic Middle School.
D. Add 2 portables at Rainier Middle School.E. Remove 3 portables from Gildo Rey Elementary School
F. Remove 5 portables from Pioneer Elementary School.
Section V
Pupil Capacity
The eight portables to be relocated in June 2020 are needed to accommodate enrollment
increases.
4
lmpact Fees
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2020 through 2026
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2019 to 2020
Appendix A.1 - Updated enrollment projections with anticipated buildout schedule from April 2020
Appendix A.2 - Student Generation Survey April2020
Section Vlll
Appendices
DATA ELEMENTS
CPF
2019
CPF
2020 EXPLANATION
Student Generation Factors
Single Family
Elementary
Middle School
Sr. High
Multi-Family
Elementary
Middle School
Sr. High
School Construction Costs
Elementary
Site Acquisition Gosts
Cost per acre
Area Cost Allowance Boeckh tndex
Match % - State
Match % - District
District Average AV
Single Family
Multi-Family
Debt Serv Tax Rate
GO Bond lnt Rate
$60,200,000
0.2370
0.0960
0.1280
0.3820
0.1 530
0.1 51 0
$385,083
$225.97
64.990/
35.01Yo
$2.05
4.09%
$366,092
$161 ,495
$60,200,000
0.2500
0.1 31 0
0.1520
0.4330
0.1 850
0.1750
$404,377
$225.97
66.32%
33.68%
$2.41
2.44o/o
$374,661
$160,501
Consistent with King County Ordinance 11621,
Student Generation Factors are calculated
by the school district based on district
records of average actual student generation
rates for new developments constructed
over the last five years.
From new school construction cost estimate in
April2019
Updated estimate based on 5% annual inflation
Updated to current OSPI schedule. (July 2019)
Updated to current OSPI schedule (May 2019)
Computed
Updated from March 2020 King County
Dept of Assessments data.
Updated from March 2020 King County
Dept of Assessments data using average
AV for apartments and condominiums.
Current FiscalYear
Current Rate (Bond Buyers 20 lndex 3-14)
5
Auburn School District No.408
Capital Facilities Plan
2020 through 2026
Section ll
E n rol I ment Projections
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2020 through 2026
ll. Student Enrollment Projections
lntroduction
Projection techniques give some consideration to historical and current data as a basis for
forecasting the future. ln addition, certain assumptions must be made about the variables in the
data being used. Forecasting can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from
history to the future or from the known to the unknown.
The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, psychological,
economic, and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection. The
logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past
are present today and will be in the future. It further moderates the impact of singular factors by
averaging data over time. The results provide a trend which reflects a long (13 year) and short
(6 year) base from which to extrapolate.
The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the
fact. This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the
assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections. Monitoring deviation is critical
to the viability and creditably of the projections derived by these techniques.
Summary ol 2020-21 En rollment Projections
Table ll.1 shows historical enrollment for the October 1 count in the Auburn School District over
the past 13 years. The data shows overall average growth over these thirteen years of 1.46%.
ln the recent six years, growth has been an overwhelming 2.44% average increase. Table ll.2
groups the historical enrollment by grade bands. This data is the baseline information used to
project future enrollment.
TABLE ll.l Thirteen Year History of October 1 Enrollment Actuals
GRADE 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 1 3-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 GRADE
KDG
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
I
10
11
12
996
995
1019
997
1 057
1 078
1 007
1 057
1033
1337
1 368
1 352
1263
998
1015
1024
1 048
1044
1069
1096
'1034
1 076
1256
1341
1350
1352
1032
1 033
998
993
1 073
1 030
1 040
1125
1031
1244
1277
1 303
1410
1010
1 066
1 016
1013
1024
1079
1041
1 060
1112
1221
1238
't258
1344
1029
1068
1 097
996
1022
1018
1063
1032
1046
1273
1170
1233
1316
1 098
1 089
1083
1111
1 038
1070
1041
1 086
1017
1 200
1278
1 164
1321
1170
1 188
1124
1125
1123
1 075
1076
1072
1116
1 159
1229
1240
1274
1232
1219
1 136
'1'136
1 156
1122
1 059
1 091
1088
1275
1 169
'1211
1323
1 198
1279
1289
1232
1170
1172
1116
1099
1 136
1229
1316
1 167
1260
1237
1210
1 300
1317
1237
1 199
1152
1132
1't08
1261
1248
1 318
1226
1 261
1276
1252
1328
1325
1 269
1207
1 194
I 183
1 258
1 300
1249
1419
1272
1 2S0
131 1
1276
1378
1 345
1275
1231
1213
1372
1 313
'1296
1377
1292
131 5
1295
1320
1316
1361
1 338
1 295
1236
1399
1411
1320
1402
KDG
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
I
9
10
11
12
TOTALS 14.559 14.703 14.589 14.482 14.363 14.596 14.971 15.277 15.663 15.945 16.525 16.949 17.300
Percent of Gain
Student Gain 144 114
0.99% (0.78)% (0.73)% (0.82)vo 'l 620 2570/" 2040/" 2530/" 1
233 375 306 386 2821 580
% Gain fo|Ist 6 years.0.48Yo
69
yeaIs"
Student Gain 13
%Gainforlast 6years
Student Gain for last 6
424 351
2.44o/o
388
7
TABLE ll.2 Grade Group Combinations based upon OctoberAcluals l9-20
998
3037
61 98
7294
1032
3063
6159
7199
10't0
30s2
6208
7249
1029
3't 94
6230
7293
1098
3270
6489
7530
'3zB3t 5391/ 6432
1237
3747
7500
8652
1261
3789
7715
8922
KDG 996
3010
6142
7149
1170
3482
6805
7BB1
1232 1198
3647 3766
70u '/ 7340
8120 ' 8456
'3238 ' 3351
2175 2235
'34s4 '3464
'3392 ' 3584
2240 2377
'3501 ' 363s
K,I,2
K-5
K-6
1-3
1-S
1-6
6-8
7-8
7-9
'3011' 3oB7 tJaz4' 3095 t 3161
's146'izoo's1z7' s19B t 5201t61s3 t 6296 '6167 'a239 ' aza+
'3097' 3206 t3196 t3213'3141
2090 2110 2156 2172 2078
' 3427' 3366' 34oo' 339s' 33s1
' 3437t s635/ 6711
3264
21 88
3347
' gssl '38oo t 3827 t 3856
' s9zg 7 6142 '6263 t 64b4
'6888 ' Tzsg '74i5 ' 7661
' 3144
2103
' 3303
7
7
79 -12
10 -12
4992
3719
'4963' 3763
4902
' 3743
's320 ' szgg ' s2s4 ' 5061 t
'3983 ' 4043 ' 3990 ' 3B4o '' 4g7B ' 4972 '50s3 ' 5226
' 37oJ ' 3743 '3792 ' 3968
1272
3873
7872
9147
3877
6600
7875
5358
3986
'3719
2444
'3816
1292
3902
7899
9237
3930
6607
7945
3869
2531
3S30
' 5532
'4133
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2020 through2026
Table ll.3 shows the three basic factors derived from the data in Table ll.1-. These factors are
a Factor 1---Average Student Change Between Grade Levels: This factor is sometimes
referred to as the "holding power" or "cohort survival." lt is a measure of the number of
students gained or lost as they move from one grade level to the next.
Factor 2--Average Student Change by Grade Level: This factor is the average change at
each grade level over the 13- or 6-year period.
Factor 3-Auburn School District Kindergarten Enrollments as a Function of King County
Live Births: This factor calculates what percent each kindergarten class was of the King
County live births in the five previous years. Kindergarten students expected for the
next four years have been extrapolated from this information.
Facior Average Student Change By
Grade Level2
Factor 2 is lhe average chanqe in grade levei slie.
13 YEAR BASE 6 YEAR BASE
K 24.67 K 12.00
1 26.67 1 19.20
2 23 00 2 19 80
3 26-92 3 36.80
4 21_58 4 32.00
5 23.58 5 47,84
6 27.58 6 55.80
7 19.83 7 40.80
I 15.92 I 29.60
9 5.17 I 24-80
10 3.58 10 48.40
11 {2,6r1 11 21.80
12 11.58 12 15.80
o
a
8
TABLE ll.3 Factors Used in Projections
Factor Average Student Change Between
Grade Levels
Factar I rs lhe auerage gain or ioss of sludenfs as lhey rnove
lrom one gnde level to the next. Factor I uses the past 12 or
6 of
13
Kts 1 42.92 Kto 1 36_50
1to2 21.42 1to2 30.17
2to3 15.50 2lo 3 22.83
3to4 28.17 3to4 28.67
4to5 13.17 4to5 12 50
5to6 5to6
6to 11 to7 17
toB to
8to9 165.57 8to9 158,33
9to 10 17.08 9to10 33.83
10 to'11 1.5 10 to 11
11 lo 12 73.58 11 to 12 87-67
total 399-75 total 452,67
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2020 through 2026
$ource: Center for Health Statistics, Washington Slate Department oI Health
Table ll.4 shows the current year actual enrollment as of October'J-,2019 and projected enrollment for
2O2O-21and five years after. Prior to the COVID health crisis, all projection models showed enrollment
growth of 1..0% to 2%. This year is the eighth consecutive year of an increase in enrollment. The 2019-20
increase of 351 students puts the average gain for the last 6 years at2.44% which equates to an average
student gain of 388 students.
Given the uncertainty we are facing, the decision was made to use the lowest growth model to estimate
projections for the 2O2O-21school year. ln addition, enrollment projections are transitioning to call out
special programs that have impacts on enrollment such as Running Start and Open Doors program. ln
the past, enrollment projections have included Running Start and Open Doors programs even though
those students did not attend school full time. For this reason, note the 2O2O-2I projections compared
to 2019-20 actual shows a slight decrease. However, when you base growth on the full-time students
attending Auburn schools, that percent reflects a 1% increase overall.
9
AU BURH SCHOOL DISTRICT KIH DE RGARTEH E H ROLLIRE I{TS
AS A FU}ICTIOII OF KIHG COUI{TY BIRTH RATES
Factor
3
CALENDAR
YEAR
TOTAL
LIVE
BIRTHS
A3 RD
EIRTHS
1/3RD
BIRTHS
YEAR OF
ENROLL
ADJ
LIVE
BIRTHS
ACTUAL
KDG
ENROLL
AUBURN KINDERGARTEN
ENROLLMENTASA%OF
ADJUSTED LIVE BIRTHS
2000
2001
2W?.
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2fi19
2010
201 I
2012
2013
2A14
201 5
2016
2017
2018
22,487
21,rrB
21,863
2?.,431
22,874
22,680
24,2U
24,S02
25,1S0
25,057
24,514
24,630
25,032
24,910
25,348
25,487
26,011
21,274
24,337
14,S91
14,51S
14,575
14,S54
15,249
15,120
16,163
16,601
16,733
16,705
16,343
16,420
16,688
16,607
16,8SS
18,SS1
17,341
16,84S
16,?25
7,496
7,25S
7,288
7,477
7,625
7,560
8,0s1
8,301
8,3S7
8,352
8,171
8,210
8,344
8,303
8,44S
8,496
8,670
8,425
8,112
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-t I
2411-12
20{2-13
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-?0
2020-21
2021-22
2022-23
2023-24
2024-25
22,014
21,835
22,24?
2?,7afr
22,745
23,723
24,683
25,0S4
25,101
24,695
24,591
24,898
24,S51
25,202
25,441
25,838
25,520
24,6,19
s41
ss6
ss8
1032
101 0
1 02S
1 0s8
1162
1732
1 1SB
1237
1281
1272
12S2
r28t
130t
12.85
r111
0
4.274V!t
4.562%.
4.487%
4.54196
4,441Vn
4.3380/6
4.448%
4.831%
4.S08%
4.85196
5.03096
5.06596
5.0ss%
5j27%
*numberfrom DOH
Last 5
year
Average
5.034!6
Actual
<-Prjctd
<-Prjctd
'{-Prjctd
<-Prjctd
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2020 through 2026
Table ll.4 Auburn School District Enrollment Projections - April 2020
K-5
9-L2
+Projections for grades 9-12 include estimated students enrolled in Running Start and Open Doors prcgrams.
Tables ll.4a-d show projections based upon the 13- and 6-year models using cohort factors and two
methods of estimating kindergarten students. The first uses the average increase or decrease over the
past 13- and 6-year timeframe and adds it to each succeeding year. The second derives what the
average percentage Auburn Kindergarteners have been from live births in King Countyforthe past 5
years and uses this to project the subsequent four years.
DISTR]CT PRGIECTIOIIS
on 13 Year History
GRADE ACTUAL
2019-20
PROJ
202t-21
PROJ
2421-22
PROJ
?.s22-23
PROJ
2023-24
PROJ
2024-25
PROJ
2t25-26
PROJ
7A2A-27
KDq
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
I
I
t0
1t
tz
TOTALS
1797
'1315
1295
1320
1316
1361
1338
1295
1236
1399
141 1
1320
1402
1 317
1335
1336
1311
1348
1329
1359
1361
1307
1402
1416
1400
1394
1341
1 360
1 356
1352
133S
1361
13?7
1382
1374
1473
141S
1405
1473
1 366
138,1
1381
1372
13S0
1352
1 380
1351
't3s5
1539
1490
1407
1418
13S1
1 409
1406
1397
1400
13S3
1350
1383
1363
1560
1 556
1475
1481
1415
1434
1430
14?1
14?'5
1413
13S1
1373
1395
152S
1 578
1545
1 55?
1440
1458
1455
1.t46
1449
1438
1411
1415
1 386
15S1
1546
1 566
1 618
1465
1483
1480
1471
1474
1463
1436
1435
14?7
1551
1578
1534
1640
Percent of Gain
Student Gain
1.82V6
314
1.S7Ve
348
1163%
2S3
1.719{
312
1.8096
334
1 E2VL
2eB
1 2896
248
1
GRAOE
2019-20
Actual
20za-2t
Projected
zo2l-22
Proiected
2022-23
Projected
2023-24
Projected
2024-25
Projected
2025-26
Projected
K 7,292 7,269 1,321 r,284 7.242 1,,767 r,269
1,315 1,316 r,326 1,353 1,315 1.270 1,295
2 1,295 1,316 1,339 1,335 7,362 7,334 7,289
3 7,32D 7,289 1,330 1,339 1,336 r,374 r,346
4 r,316 1,327 1,316 r,344 1,354 1,361 1,400
5 7,361 1,301 1,332 1,308 1,336 1,356 1,363
7.899 7.8L8 7,964 7,963 7,945 7,562 7,562
6 1.338 1,336 r,297 7,3L4 1,290 1,329 1,349
7 1,295 7,342 1,362 1,308 r,326 r,372 1,351
8 7,236 1,298 1,364 7,370 1,316 1,345 1,331
6-8 3,8€9 3,976 4,O23 3.992 3932 3,986 4,031
g*1,399 1,393 1,483 r,544 1,551 1,502 1.535
10*T,47I 7,427 1,436 7,5r4 1,576 1,596 1,546
1l*1,320 7,364 1,401 7,402 1,477 7,552 7,57L
r.282t2*r,402 1,386 1,400 1,303 1,485 1,559
5_4605.532 5,706 5,860 5,907 6,135 6,2L1
TOTALS 17-300 L7.234 17.693 17.815 t7.744 18.O83 18.204
10
TABLE
il.4b
DISTR]CT PROJECTIOI{S
Based on 6 Year Hietory
GRADE ACTUAL
20t9-20
PRO.I
20?4-21
PROJ
2821-22
PROJ
2022-23
PROJ
2023-24
PROJ
2024-25
PROJ
2t25-26
PROJ
2026-27
KT}G
I
z
3
4
5
6
7
I
s
t0
11
t2
TOTALS
1292
1315
12S5
1320
't31 6
1361
1338
1235
'1236
1 3S9
1411
1320
'1402
1304
132S
1345
1318
134S
132S
1355
1364
131S
139,1
't433
140S
1408
1316
1341
1359
1 36S
1 347
1361
1323
138'.r
1 38S
1478
1428
1431
1 4S6
1328
1353
1371
138?
13S7
1359
'1355
1349
1406
1547
151'r
14?6
't 518
1340
'1365
1383
1394
1410
1409
1353
1382
1373
1564
1581
1509
1514
1352
1377
13S5
1.108
1422
1423
1403
1 379
1 406
1 531
1 599
1578
15S7
1364
1 389
1497
141 I
1434
1435
't417
1430
1404
1564
1 565
1 5S5
1 666
1376
1401
141 I
1430
1446
1447
1429
1443
1454
1562
1598
1563
1 683
PercentofGain 2.0596
Student Gain 355
2.0496
361
1.58%
284
1.50%
214
1.57%
2S1
1.17%
220
0.s5%
163
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2020 through 2026
TABLE
ll.4c
DISTRNT PROJECTIOIS
Based on Eirth Rates & I 3 Year Hislorv
GRADE ACTUAL
201 9-20
PROJ
2420-21
PROJ
2421-22
PROJ
2022-23
PROJ
2023-24
K
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
I
I
t0
fi
12
'1292
1315
12S5
1320
1316
1 361
1295
1238
1399
1411
1320
't402
1252
't335
1 336
131 1
1 348
1 32S
1359
1361
1307
1402
1416
't400
1394
1281
1335
1 356
1352
133S
1361
1327
1382
1374
1473
1419
1405
1473
1301
1324
1 356
1372
1380
1352
1360
135'l
1395
1539
14S0
1407
1478
440t
1344
1345
1372
1 400
1393
1 350
1383
1363
1 560
1556
1479
1481
TOTALS
Percent of Gain
Student Gain
1.67%
2S0
1.63%
297
1.27qh
227
1.14%
206
TABLE
ll.4rl
DISTRICT PROJECTIOHS
BEsed on Birth Rates & 6 Yesr History
GRADE ACTUAL
2019-20
PROJ
2070-21
PROJ
2A2l-22
PROJ
2022-23
PROJ
2023-24
KDG
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
I
I
t0
t1
12
1292
1315
1 295
1320
1316
1361
1338
1295
1236
1399
141 1
1320
1402
lAOt
1329
1345
1318
1349
1 329
'1355
1364
1319
13S4
1433
1409
1408
1281
1329
1359
1 368
1347
1 361
1323
1381
1 388
1478
1 428
1431
'1496
1301
1317
135S
1352
1 397
1 359
1 355
1349
1406
1547
151 1
1426
1518
1285
1337
1347
1382
1410
140S
1 353
1382
1373
1564
1581
150S
1514
TOTALS
Percent ot Gain
Sludent Gain
1.98%
343
1.8596
326
1.43%
257
1.20%
21S
1.1
Auburn School District No.40B
Capital Facilities Plan
2020 through 2026
Section lll
Standard of Service
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2020 through 2026
STANDARD OF SERVICE
The School lmpact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent indicate
that each school district must establish a "Standard of Seruice" in order to asceftain the overall capacity to house
its projected student population. The Superintendent of Public lnstruction esfab/ishes square footage
"capacity" guidelines for computing s/afe funding support. The fundamental purpose of the OSPI guidelines
is to provide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching funds for school construction projects. By default
these guidelines have been used to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population. The OSPI
guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, facility configurations, emerging
educational reform, or the dynamics of each student's educational program. The Auburn School District Standard
of Seruice addresses those local considerations that require space rn excess of the OSPI guidelines. The effect
on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation
pattern. Conditions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without
acco m pany i ng co m putation s.
OVERVIEW
The Auburn School District operates fourteen elementary schools housing 7,899 students in grades
K through 5. The four middle schools house 3,869 students in grades 6 through B. The District operates
three comprehensive senior high schools and one alternative high school, housing 5,532 students in
grades 9 through 12.
crAss srzE
The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the
student population. Specialists create additional space needs. Class sizes are subject to collective
bargaining agreements. Changes to class size agreements can have significant impact on available space
The current pupil/teacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 20.33 students per
teacher. Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 20.33 students per room at grades
K - 5. At grades 6 - B the limit is set at 28.02 students per room. At grades 9 - 12 the limit is set at
28.74 students per room. The OSPI space allocation for each grade articulation level, /ess the computed
reduction for the Auburn School District Standard of Service, determines the District's capacity to house
projected pupil populations. These reductions are shown below by grade articulation level.
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
STRUCTURED LEARNING FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION
The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate to severe
disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses 15 classrooms to provide for 126 students
The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. No loss of
capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to
total elementary population.
PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION
The Auburn School District operates an adaptive behavior program for students with behavior
disabilities at the elementary school level. The program uses three classrooms to provide for 28 students.
The housing requirements for this program exceed the OSPI space allocations.
(Three classrooms @20.33 - 11 = 9.33)
Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 9.33 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 9.33 each =
Total Capacity Loss =
(28)
0
13
(28)
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2020 through 2026
STANDARD OF SERVICE
SPECIAL EDUCATIO'V RESOURCE ROOMS
The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary levelfor special
education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities. Nineteen standard
classrooms are required to house this program. The housing requirements for this program exceed
the OSPI space guidelines. Continued loss of capacity is expected as growth in program is larger
than the total elementary population.
(1 83)
0
(1 83)
NATIVE AMER'CAN RESOURCE ROOM
The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American
students at the elementary level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students.
Loss of Permanent Capacity I (17-B) rooms @20.33 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each =
Total CaPacity Loss =
Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 20.33 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @20.33 each =
Total Capacity Loss =
Loss of Permanent Capacity 12 rooms @20.33 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @20.33 each =
Total Capacity Loss =
Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @20.33 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each =
Total Capacity Loss =
Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @20.33 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @20.33 each =
Total Capacity Loss =
(20)
0
(20)
EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION
The Auburn School District operates a pre-school program for young children below age five with
disabilities. This program is housed at seven different elementary schools and currently uses 12
standard classrooms. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI
space guidelines.
(244)
0
(244)
READING LABS
The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional
language arts instruction. These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces if available in
each elementary school. Four elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available, thus
they are housed in a standard classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not
provided for in the OSPI space guidelines.
(102)
0
(102)
MUSIC ROOMS
The Auburn School District elementary music programs require one acoustically-modified classroom at each
schoolfor music instruction. The housing requirements are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines.
(305)
0
14
(305)
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2020 through 2026
STANDARD OF SERVICE
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM
The Auburn School District operates pullout programs at the elementary school level for students
learning English as a second language. This program requires 30 standard classrooms that are not
provided for in the OSPI space guidelines.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 30 rooms @20.33 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each =
Total Capacity Loss =
Loss of Permanent Capacity B rooms @20.33 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each =
Total Capacity Loss =
Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @20.33 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each =
Total Capacity Loss =
Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 20.33 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each =
Total Capacity Loss =
(610)
0
(610)
SECO/VD GRADE TOSA PROGRAM
The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for eight highly-impacted
elementary schools. This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade
level and do not receive other services. This program requires eight standard classrooms that are
not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines.
(1 63)
0
(1 63)
ELEMENTARY LEARNI NG SPECIALIST PROG RAM
The Auburn School District provides a learning specialist program to increase literacy skills for
first and second graders. This program model was originally created from the l-728 funds and currently
has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms, as well as pulling out students into
designated classrooms. The district is utilizing classrooms at all fourteen elementary schools.
(305)
0
(305)
EARLY C H I LD H O O D ED U CATION ASS'STA N CE P ROG RAM
The Auburn School District operates an ECEAP program for 246 pre-school aged children in twelve sections
of half-day length and one full-day program. The program is housed at three elementary schools and three
off-site locations and utilizes three standard elementary classrooms and four additional classroom spaces
and four auxiliary office spaces. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI
space guidelines.
(142)
0
(142)
15
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2020 through 2026
STANDARD OF SERVICE
MIDDLE SCHOOLS
SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS
The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level.
This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific
disabilities. Eleven classrooms are required at the middle school level to provide for approximalely 292 students.
The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the OSPI space guidelines.
PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATIO N
The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior
disabilities. The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses two classrooms. One of the
two classrooms for this program are provided for in the OSPI space allocations.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 rooms @28.02 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each =
Total Capacity Loss
Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @28.02 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each =
Total Capacity Loss
Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @28.02 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @28.02 each =
Total Capacity Loss
Loss of Permanent Capacity 9 rooms @28.02 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @28.02 each =
Total Capacity Loss
(28)
0
(28)
STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION
The Auburn School District operates six structured learning classrooms at the middle school level for
students with moderate to severe disabilities. Two of the six classrooms for this program are provided for
in the OSPI space allocations.
(112)
0
(112)
NATIVE AMER'CA'V RESO U RCE ROOM
The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American
students at the middle school level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM
The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for English Language
Learner students. This program requires nine standard classrooms that are not provide for in the OSPI
space guidelines.
28
0
28
(252)
0
(2s2)
16
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2020 through 2026
STANDARD OF SERVICE
ROOM UTILIZATION
The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes
elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are
not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available
teaching stations. OSPI Report#3 dated 12114111 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the
mid-level facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately B teaching stations.
Loss of Permanent Capacity B rooms @28.02 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each =
Total Capacity Loss
(224)
0
(224)
17
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2020 through 2026
STANDARD OF SERVICE
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM
The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American
students at the high school level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @28.74 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each =
Total Capacity Loss
SEA/'OR HIGH COMPUTER LABS
The Auburn School District support standard allows for one open computer lab at each of the senior high
schools. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines.
29
0
29
Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 28.74 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each =
Total Capacity Loss
Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 1 rooms @ 28.74 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each =
Total Capacity Loss
Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 28.74 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @28,74 each =
Total Capacity Loss
(1 15)
0
(1 15)
ENGLISH LANG UAG E LEARNERS PROGRA,M
The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at three comprehensive high schools for English
Language Learner students. This program requires eleven standard classrooms that are not provided
for in the OSPI space guidelines.
(316)
0
(316)
PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDU CATION
The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior
diabilities. The program is housed at one of the high schools and uses one classroom. The housing
requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI space allocations.
(2s)
0
(2s)
STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM
The Auburn School District operates twelve structured learning center classrooms for students with
moderate to severe disabilities. This program is housed at three high schools requiring standard
classrooms that are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 12 rooms @28.74 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each =
Total Capacity Loss
0
(345)
't8
(345)
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2020 through 2026
STANDARD OF SERVICE
SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS
The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special
education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities. The current
high school program requires 15 classrooms to provide program to meet educational needs of
the students. The OSPI space guidelines provide for one of the 15 teaching stations.
(402)
0
(402)
P ERF O RM I NG AR IS CETVIERS
Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center. The
OSPI lnventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity. This space was
not intended for, nor is it usable for, classroom instruction. lt was constructed to provide a
community center for the performing arts. Using OSPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet
computes to 208 unhoused students or 7 .25 classrooms.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 7.25 rooms @ 28.74 each =(208)
ROOM UTILIZATION
The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous
elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are
not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available
teaching stations. There are 185 teaching stations available in the senior high facilities. The utilization
pattern results in a loss of approximately 10 teaching stations.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @28.74 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each =
Total Capacity Loss
Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @28.74 each =
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each =
Total Capacity Loss
STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS
ELEMENTARY
Loss of Permanent Capacity (2,102)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0
Total Capacity Loss (2J04
MIDDLE SCHOOL
Loss of Permanent Capacity (5BB)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0
(287)
0
(287)
Total Capacity Loss
SENIOR HIGH
Loss of Permanent Capacity
Loss of Temporary Capacity
Total Capacity Loss
TOTAL
Loss of Permanent Capacity
Loss of Temporary Capacity
Total Capacity Loss
(58B)
(1,674)
0-(,@
(4,364)
0
(4,364)
19
Auburn School District No.408
Capital Facilities Plan
2020 through 2026
Section lV
lnventory of Facilities
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2020 through 2026
INVENTORY OF FACILITIES
Table lV.1 shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OSPI rated capacities.
Table lV.2 shows the number and location of each portable unit by school. The district uses relocatable
facilities to:
1. provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school
populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting,
2. make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique
student needs, and
3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed
Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on
existing physical plants. Core facilities (i.e. gymnasiums, restrooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc.) are
not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable
classrooms.
Table
tv.1
Permanent Facilities
@ OSPI Rated Capacity
(March 2020)
District School Facilities
Buildinq Gapacitv Acres Address
Elementary Schools
Washinqton Elementary 494 5.33 20 E Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002
Terminal Park Elementarv 415 6.09 1101 D Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002
Dick Scobee Elementarv 484 8.90 1031 14th Street Northeast. Auburn WA. 98002
Pioneer Elementarv 441 8.40 2301 M Street Southeast, Auburn WA. 98002
Chinook Elementarv 461 10.99 3502 Auburn Wav South, Auburn WA, 98092
Lea Hill Elementary 450 20.24 30908 124th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA,98092
Gildo Rev Elementarv 566 '10.05 1005 37th Street Southeast. Auburn WA. 98002
Everoreen Heiohts Elem 463 '10.10 5602 South 316th. Auburn WA. 98001
Alpac Elementarv 505 10.68 310 Milwaukee Boulevard North, PacificWA, 98047
Lake View Elementary 581 16.44 16401 Southeast 318th Street, Auburn WA, 98092
Hazelwood Elementarv 594 13.08 'l 1815 Southeast 304th Street, Auburn WA, 98092
llalko Elementarv 592 14.23 301 Oravetz Place Southeast. Auburn WA. 98092
Lakeland Hills Elementarv 594 12.00 1020 Evergreen Way SE, Auburn WA, 98092
Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 614 10.02 29205 132nd Street SE, Auburn WA, 98092
ELEMENTARY CAPACITY 7,254
Middle Schools
Cascade Middle School 837 16.94 1015 24th Street Northeast. Auburn WA, 98002
Olvmoic Middle School 974 17.45 839 21"t Street SE, Auburn WA, 98002
Rainier Middle School 843 25.54 30620 1 'l6th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092
Mt. Baker Middle School 837 30.00 620 371fl Street Southeast. Auburn WA. 98002
MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3.317
Senior Hiqh Schools
West Auburn HS 233 5.26 401 West Main Street, Auburn WA, 98001
Auburn HS 2.127 23.74 711 East Main Street. Auburn WA. 98002
Auburn Riverside HS 1.387 35.32 50'1 Oravetz Road, Auburn WA, 98092
Auburn Mountainview HS 1.443 39.42 28900124th Ave SE, Auburn WA, 98092
HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5,190
21
titx ,-l.rt{Id6pf -:',i.,..tIamHw,,J.lJ.;jffiI.; Auburn- Mountainview HS- Arthur Jacobsen ES#Bt Cascade MS ; Hazelwood ESRainier MS Lea Hiil ESDick Scobee ES. Evero-rlen Heiolf qt l_..! t -'to,--rr -I,, .i., ':; Administrationwest Aubur{r i{d ' , ''.' . '' Auburn HS''i: " i -r.1..; i' '' Washington ESIBuilding''- Lake View ES. ,??.,TerrniqplFarkFStll' .i: Olvmoic n,lS= --\'.yf r-- ;iS'.rll.,:t,,IChinook ES ''o , I'u'?,irI ,r. PioneerES" Gildo Rey ES: Alpac ESI - fUt Baker MS..*.,..;*: i; ' g'. t:ffi"-: Auburn RiversiGHS- tt"tto es tBowman Creek ES' Lakeland Hills ESIl--lr:t llI:-iirI=r:tIF.Souree Es4 Dbhrehbo, @c@Brc, tradjhdarGooWhfle, ChfiEgAftbre DS, USIDA tJS@nAm@lRflD,!@N1, amd the GIS Llren@miftnurffry
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2020 through 2026
INVENTORY OF FACILITIES
*TAP - Transition Assistance Program for 18-21 year old students with special needs
TABLE
tv.2
TEM PO RARY/RELOCATAB LE
FACILITIES INVENTORY
(June 2020)
Elementarv Location 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026
Washington
Terminal Park
Dick Scobee
Pioneer
Chinook
Lea Hill
Gildo Rey
Evergreen Heights
Alpac
Lake View
Hazelwood
llalko
Lakeland Hills
Arthur Jacobsen
Bowman Creek
Elementarv #16
6
8
0
5
6
13
7
4
8
2
2
7
7
4
0
0
7
8
0
0
b
13
4
4
8
2
2
7
7
4
0
0
8
8
0
0
0
0
4
4
8
2
2
8
7
4
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
5
4
8
2
2
8
7
4
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
5
4
8
2
2
8
7
4
0
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
5
4
8
2
2
8
7
4
0
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
5
4
8
2
2
8
7
4
0
0
TOTAL UNITS
TOTAL CAPACITY
79
1,606
72
1.464
55
1 ,118
49
996
49
996
49
996
49
996
Middle School Location 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026
Cascade
Olympic
Rainier
Mt. Baker
0
0
7
10
I
4
I
10
4
b
10
11
4
6
10
11
4
6
10
11
4
b
10
11
4
6
10
11
TOTAL UNITS
TOTAL CAPACITY
17
476
24
672
31
869
31
869
31
869
31
869
31
869
Sr. Hiqh School Location 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026
West Auburn
Auburn High School
Auburn High School - *TAP
Auburn Riverside
Auburn Mountainview
0
0
1
13
4
0
0
I
13
4
0
2
1
13
6
0
3
1
14
8
0
3
1
14
8
0
3
1
14
8
0
3
1
14
8
TOTAL UNITS
TOTAL CAPACITY
18
517
18
517
22
632
26
747
26
747
26
747
26
747
COMBINED TOTAL UNITS
COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY
114
2,600
114
2,654
108
2,619
106
2,612
106
2,612
106
2,6',t2
106
2,612
23
Auburn School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2020 through 2026
Section V
Pupil Capacity
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2020 lhrough 2026
PUPIL CAPACITY
While the Auburn School District uses the OSPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from
which to determine space needs, the District's educational program requires more space than that
provided for under the formula. This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in
Section lll, Standard of Service. The District's capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional
space to house its programs. Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new funded
facilities. The combined effect of these adjustments is shown on Line B in Tables V.1 and V.2 below.
Table V.1 shows the Distict's capacitywith relocatable units included and Table V.2 without these units
3l
1/ New facilities shown in 2019-20 through 2023-24 are funded by the 2016 School Bond lssue.
4 The Standard of Service represents 27 .69% of OSPI capacity. When new facilities are added the Standard of Service
computations are decreased to 24.16% of SPI capacity.
3/ Students beyond the capacity are accommodated in other spaces (commons, library, theater, shared teaching space).
2t
2024-202t
Capacity
WITH relocatables
Table V.1
2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2025-2026
13,997
17,261
(3,264)
2,600
(4,364
15,761
650
166
(1,710)
14,867
17,618
(2,751)
2,654
(4,364
16,577
650
209
(1,745)
15,691
18,005
(2,314)
2,619
(4,364\
17,436
(1,752)
16,073
18,347
(2,274)
2,612
(4,364\
389
17,825
(1,6e6)
16,364
18,700
(2,336)
2,668
(4,364\
235
1B,060
(1,6e6)
16,364
19,053
(2,6Be)
2,668
(4,364
18,060
(1,6e6)
16,364
19,365
(3,001)
2,668
(4,364
Total Adjustments (1,764)
SPI Capacity-Replacements
CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS
15,761
B.
c.
D.
764
E ASD Surplus/Deficit
Exclude SOS 14
ASD Enrollment
lnclude Relocatable
A.
A.1
4.2
Capacity Adjustments
Net Capacity
SPI Capacity
SPI Capacity-New Elem
(1,710)(1,745)(1,752)(1,6e6)(1,6e6)(1,696)
Capacity
WITHOUT relocatables
Table V.2
2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-202!2025-2026
11,397
17,261
(5,864)
(4,364
15,761
650
'166
(4,364)
12,213
17,618
(5,405)
(4,364
16,577
650
209
(4,364)
13,072
18,005
(4,933)
@.364\
17,436
389
(4,364)
13,461
18,347
(4,886)
(4.364\
17,825
235
(4,364)
13,696
18,700
(5,004)
(4,364)
18,060
(4,364)
13,696
19,053
(5,357)
(4,364)
18,060
13,696
19,365
(5,66e)
@,364
Total Adjustments (4,364)
SPI Capacity-Replacements
CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS
15,761
4,364
Exclude SOS 14
B
c
D
E.ASD Surplus/Deficit
ASD Enrollment
A.
A.1
4.2
Capacity Adjustments
Net Capacity
SPI Capacity
SPI Capacity-New Elem
(4,364)(4,364)(4,364)(4,364)(4,364)(4,364)
25
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FAGILITIES PLAN
2020 through 2026
PUPIL CAPACITY
PERMANENT FACILITIES
@ SPI Rated Capacity
(March 2020)
A. Elementa Schools
B. Middle Schools
C. Senior H Schools
Buildino 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Washington
Terminal Park
Dick Scobee
Pioneer
Chinook
Lea Hill
Gildo Rey
Evergreen Heights
Alpac
Lake View
Hazelwood
llalko
Lakeland Hills
Arthur Jacobsen
Elementary #15
Elementarv #'16
494
415
484
441
461
450
566
463
505
581
594
592
594
614
494
415
650
441
461
450
566
463
505
581
594
592
594
614
650
494
415
650
650
461
450
566
463
505
581
594
592
594
614
650
650
650
650
650
650
566
463
505
581
594
592
594
614
650
650
494
415
494
650
650
650
650
650
566
463
505
581
594
592
594
614
650
650
494
650
650
650
650
650
566
463
505
581
594
592
594
614
650
650
494
650
650
650
650
650
566
463
505
581
594
592
594
614
650
650
ELEMENTARY CAPACITY 7,254 8,070 8,929 9,318 9,553 9,553 9,553
Buildinq 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Cascade
Olympic
Rainier
Mt. Baker
837
800
843
837
837
800
843
837
837
800
843
837
837
800
843
837
837
800
843
837
837
800
843
837
837
800
843
837
MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3,317 3,317 3,317 3,317 3,317 3,317 3,317
Buildino 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
West Auburn
Auburn
Auburn Riverside
Auburn Mountainview
233
2,127
1,387
1,443
233
2,127
1,387
1,443
233
2,127
1,387
1,443
233
2,127
1,387
1,443
233
2,127
1,387
1,443
233
2,127
1,387
1,443
233
2,127
1,387
1,443
HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5,1 90 5,190 5,1 90 5,1 90 5,190 5,1 90 5,1 90
COMBINED CAPAGITY 15,761 1 77 17 6 17 825 1 60 1 060 18
26
Auburn School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2020 through 2026
Section Vl
Capital Construction Plan
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2020 through 2026
CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN
The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974
with the formation of a community wide citizens committee. The result of this committee's work was
published in the document titled 'Guidelines for Development.' ln 1985 the Board formed a second
Ad Hoc citizens committee to further the work of the first and address the needs of the District for
subsequent years. The work of this committee was published in the document titled Directions for
the Nineties.' ln 1995 the Board commissioned a third Ad Hoc citizens committee to make
recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and physical facilities. The committee
recommendations are published in the document titled Education lnto The Twenty-First Century - -
A Community lnvolved.'
The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop plans for the implementation,
funding, and deploymentof technologythroughoutthe District's programs. The 1996 Bond
proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate technological
applications. The 1998 Capital Levy provided funding to further deploy technology at a level
sufficient to support program requirements in every classroom and department. ln 2005 and 2014,
replacement technology levies were approved to continue to support technology across all facets of
the District's teaching, learning and operations.
ln addition to the technology needs of the District, the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District
must prepare for continued student enrollment growth. As stated in their report, "the District must
pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible." The Ad Hoc recommendation included
commentary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent rates of tax assessments.
A proposition was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that provided $8,000,000 over six years
to address some of the technology needs of the District; and $5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire
school sites.
During the 1997-98 school yeat, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the
Auburn and Dieringer School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school
population from an area that includes a large development known as Lakeland South. Lakeland
South at that time was immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the Auburn School District.
On June 16, 1998, the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the
Auburn and Dieringer Boards of Directors. On June 22, 1998, the Auburn School Board adopted
Resolution No. 933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District
in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 23, 1998, the Dieringer
School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 24-97-98 authorizing the process to initiate the
adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These
actions resulted in the transfer of an area from Dieringer to Auburn containing most of the Lakeland
South development and certain other undeveloped properties.
Property for the third comprehensive high schoolwas acquired in 1999. The Board placed the
proposition to construct a new high school on the ballot four times. Each election was extremely
close to passing. After the fourth failure a community meeting was held and from that meeting the
Board determined need for further community study.
ln April of 2002, the Board formed a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two
items and make recommendations to the Board in the Fall of 2002:
a. A review of the conclusion and recommendations of 1985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees
related to accommodating high school enrollment growth. This included the review of
possible financing plans for new facilities.
b. Develop recommendations for accommodating high school enrollment growth for the next 10
years if a new senior high school is not built.
28
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2020 through 2026
CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN
This committee recommended the Board place the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in
February 2403. The February election approved the new high school a|68.71% yes votes. The
school opened in the fall of 2005.
ln the fall of 2003, the Board directed the administration to begin the planning and design for
Elementary #13 and Elementary #14. ln the fall of 2004, the Board passed Resolution No. 1054 to
place two elementary schools on the ballot in February 2005. The voters approved the ballot
measure in February of 2005 at 64.72%. Lakeland Hills Elementary (Elementary #13) opened in the
fall of 2006. Arthur Jacobsen Elementary (Elementary #14) is located in the Lea Hill area and
opened in the fall of 2007. These two elementary schools were built to accommodate the housing
growth in Lakeland Hills and Lea Hill areas of the school district.
ln the 2004-05 school year, the Board convened a sixth Citizen's Ad Hoc committee to again study
and make recommendations about the future impacts in the District. One of the areas of study was
the need for New Facilities and Modernizalion. The committee made a number of recommendations
including school size, the need for a new middle school, and to begin a capital improvements
program to modernize or replace facilities based upon criterion.
During the 2005-06 school yeat, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the
Auburn and Kent School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school
population that will come from an area that includes a number of projected developments in the
north Auburn valley. On May 17,2006, the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a
joint meeting of the Auburn and Kent Boards of Directors. On June 14,2006, the Kent School Board
adopted Resolution No. 1225 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of
the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 26, 2006, the
Auburn School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 1073 authorizing the processto initiate
the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation.
These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from the Kent School District to the Auburn School
District effective September 29, 2006.
ln October of 2008, after two years of review and study, a Steering Committee made
recommendations to the Board regarding the capital improvements program to modernize or replace
facilities as recommended by the 2004-05 Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee. These recommendations,
based on specific criteria, led to the Board placing a school improvement bond and capital
improvements levy on the ballot in March 2009. Voters did not approve either measure that would
have updated 24 facilities and replaced three aging schools. The Board decided to place only a six-
year Capital Levy on the ballot in November of 2009, which passed at 55.17o/o. The levy funded
$46.4 million of needed improvement projects at 24 sites over the following seven school years.
Planning for the replacement of aging schools was started with educational specifications and
schematic design process for the replacement of Auburn High School.
The District acquired a site for a future high school in 2008 and a second site for a future middle
school in 2009. The District also continued efforts to acquire property around Auburn High School
The Special Education Transition Facility opened in February of 2010. This facility is designed for
students with disabilities that are 18 to 21 years old.
ln the November 2012 election, the community supported the $110 million bond issue for the Auburn
High School Modernization and Reconstruction Project al62%. Construction began in February
2013. The entire new building was occupied by Auburn High School students and staff in the fall of
2015, with site improvements being completed during the 2015-16 schoolyear.
29
1t
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2020 through 2026
CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN
ln January 2015, a citizen's ad hoc committee was convened by direction of the Board to address
growth and facilities. The major recommendations were to construct two new elementary schools in
the next four years and to acquire 3 new elementary school sites as soon as possible.
ln the November 2016 election, the community supported the $456 million bond issue for the
replacement of six schools and the construction of two new elementary schools at62.83%.
Construction for the replacement of Olympic Middle School began in May 2018 and was completed
in Fall2019. Construction for New Elementary School#15 began in May 2019 and will be
completed in Fall 2020. Construction for the replacement of Dick Scobee Elementary School began
in June 2019 and will be completed in Fall 2020. Construction for New Elementary School#16 and
replacement of Pioneer Elementary School began in May 2020 and will be completed in Fall 2021.
Within the six-year period, the District is projecting 904 additional students. This increase in student
population along with anticipated class-size reductions, will require the construction of a second new
elementary school and acquiring one new elementary school site during the six-year window.
The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years. The exact
timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population.
1/ Thesefundsmaybesecuredthroughacombinationofthe20l6Bondlssue,saleof real property,impactfees,andstate
matching funds. The District currently is eligible for state matching funds for new construction at the elementary school level and for
modernization at the elementary and middle school levels.
tl
Ll
Ll
1t
2020-26 Capital Construction Plan
(Mav 2020)
Proiect Funded
Projected
Cost
Fund
Source
Project Timelines
20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 24-25 I 25-261 26-27
Technology
Modernization Yes $35,000,000
2020
6 Year
Cap. Levy
Portable Relocation Yes $1,800,000 lmpact
Fees XX XX
Property Purchase -
1 New Elementarv Yes $7,500,000 Bond
lmpact Fee XX XX XX XX XX
Multiple Facility
lmprovements Yes $46,400,000 Capital
Levy XX XX
Elementary #15 Yes $48,500,000 Bond
lmpact Fee
XX
open
Elementary #16 Yes $48,500,000 Bond
lmpact Fee
XX
const
XX
open
Replacement of five
Elementary Schools Yes $242,500,000 Bond XX
const
XX
const
XX
const
XX
open
30
Auburn School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2020 through 2026
Section Vll
lmpact Fees
IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION (Spring 2020)Elementary #16 within 2 year periodI. SITE COST PER RESIDENCEFormula: ((Acres x CostAcreaciSizex Student Factoril, PERMANENT FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCEFormula: ((Facility Cost/Facilx Student FxIII. TEMPORARY FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCEFormula: ((CosVFacilx StudentAuburn School District No. 408CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN2020 through 2026to Totalx District Match x Studentemto TotalXSiFamiIV, STATE MATCH CREDIT PER RESIDENCEFormula: (Boeckh lndex x SPICosVMulti Family$4,040.26$0.00$o.oo$4,040.26$2,332.71Cost/Sinole Family$2,332.71$0.00$0.000.43300.1 8500.1 750Student Generation FactorSingle Family Multi Family0.25000.1 31 00.1520FacilityCapacity650800'1500Cost/Acre$0$o$404,337SiteAcreaqe152540Elem (K - 5)Middle Sch (6 - 8)Sr Hiqh (9 - 12)Cost/Multi Family$37,815.02$0.00$0.00$37,815.02Cost/Single Family$2 1 ,833.1 5$0.00$0.00$21,833.150.43300.1 8500.1 750Student Generation FactorSinqle Family Multi Familv0.25000.1 31 00.'t 520% Perm Sq Ft/Total Sq Ft0.94300.94300.9430FacilitySize6508001 500FacilityCost$60,200,000$0$0Elem (K - 5)Mid Sch (6 - B)Sr High (9 - 12\CosVMulti Familv$218.68$67.79$62.52$348.98Cost/Sinqle Familv$126.26$48.00$54.30$228.550.43300.1 8500.1 750Student Generation FactorSingle Family Multi Family0.25000.1 31 00.1520% Temp Sq Ft/Total Sq Ft0.05700.05700.0570FacilitySize20.3328.0228.74FacilityCost$180,000$180,000$180,000Elem (K - 5)Mid Sch (6 - 8)Sr Hiqh (9 - 12)$6,156.78Cost/Multi Familv$6,156.77$0.00$0.00CosVSingle Family$3,554.72$0.00$0.00$3,554.720.43300.1 8500.1 750Student Generation FactorSingle Familv Multi Familv0.25000.1 31 00.1520StateMatch66.32yo66.32o/o66.320/.SPIFootage90108130Boeckhlndex$238.22$0.00$0.00Elem (K - 5)Mid Sch (6 - 8)Sr Hish (9 - 12\32
V, TN( CREDIT PER RESIDENCEFormula: Expressed as the present value of an annuityTC = PV(interest rate,discount period,average assd value x tax rate)VI, DEVELOPER PROVIDED FACILITY CREDITFormula: (Value of Site or Facility/Number of dwelling units)Auburn School District No. 408CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN2020 through 202687Tax CreditMulti FamilyTax CreditSingle Family$7,927.08Number ofYearsBnd Byr lndxAnn lnt RateCurr Dbt ServTax RateAve ResidAssd Value$2.41$2.412.44o/o2.440h1010$160,5014,661ngle FamilyMultiFaci$0.00$0.00No. of UnitsValue0000Single FamilyMultiMultipleFamily$16,325.80PER UNIT IMPACT FEESSingleFamily$6.456.31FEERECAPSUMMARYSite CostsPermanent Facility Const Costs$21,833.15$228.55($3,554.72)$37,815.02$348.98($6,156.78)332.71040.26395.87porary Facility CostsState Match CreditCredit,927FEE (No Discount)FEE (50% Discount)Less ASD DiscountFacility Credit$12,9't2.61$6,456.31$0.00$0.00$32,651.61$16,325.80$o.oo$0.00Net Fee Obligation33
Sife CosfAuburn School District No. 408CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN2020 through 2026MULTI FAMILYSr High9-120.1751 50028.74$180,00040$404,3371,700,850102,8851,803,73594.30%5.70o/o130$238.2266.32o/o33.68%$160,501$2.412.44o/oMid Sch6-80.1 8580028.02$1 80,00025$404,3371,700,850102,8851,803,73594.30%5.700/o108$238.2266.32%33.68%$160,501$2.412.44o/oElemK-50.433650$60,200,00020.33$180,00012$404,3371,700,850102,8851,803,73594.30%5.70o/"90$238.2266.32%33.68%$160,501$2.412.44o/oSINGLE FAMILYSr High9-120.1521 50028.74$180,00040$404,3371,700,850102,8851,803,73594.30o/o5.70o/o130$238.2266.320/"33.68%$374,661$2.412.44o/oMid Sch6-B0.1 3180028.02$180,00025$404,3371,700,850102,885'1,803,73594.30%5.70%108$238.2266.32%33.68%$374,661$2.412.44%ElemK-50.250650$60,200,00020.33$180,00012$404,3371,700,850102,8851,803,73594.30%5.70o/o90$238.2266.32%33.68%$374,661$2.412.44%IMPACT FEE ELEMENTSSingle Family - Auburn actual count April 2020Elementary Cost Estimates April 2020ASD District Standard of Service.Grades K - 5 @ 20.33, 6 -B @28.02, &9 - 12 @28.74.Relocatables, including site work, set up, and furnishing.ASD District Standard or SPI MinimumSee below14 Elementary, 4 Middle, and 4 High Schools2x768 SF + 24 x 864 SF + 87 x 8g6 SF + TAP 2661Sum of Permanent and Temporary abovePermanent Sq. Footage divided by Total Sq. FootageTemporary Sq. Footage divided by Total Sq. FootageFrom OSPI Regulations (WAC 392-343-035)From OSPI projection for July 2O2OFrom OSPI May 2020ComputedKing County Department of Assessments March 2020Current Fiscal YearCurrent Rate - (Bond Buyer 20 lndex Feb. 2020 avg)Student FactorNew Fac CapacityNew Facility CostTemp Rm CapacityTemp Facility CostSite AcreageSite Cost/AcrePerm Sq FootageTemp Sq FootageTotal Sq Footage% - Perm Facilities% - Temp FacilitiesSPI Sq FVStudentBoeckh lndexMatch % - StateMatch % - DistrictDist Aver AVDebt Serv Tax RateG. O Bond lnt RateProjectedCost/Acre$491,474Latest Dateof Acquisition2025SitesRequiredElementary2020 Annuallnflation Factor5%Projected Annuallnflation Factor5.00%2019 Annuallnflation Factor10.00%$404,337AdjustedPresent Day$401,274$379,431$664,125PurchaseCosVAcre$382,1 66$361,363$575,000$380,593PurchasePrice$480,000$2,959,561$460,000$3,89e,561PurchaseYear20't920192018Acreage1.268.190.8010.25Recent PropertyAcquisitionsElem. #16 Parcel 1Elem. #16 Parcel 2Elem. #16 Parcel 3Total34
Auburn School District No. 408CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN2020 through 2026VII. IMPACT FEE MODIFICATIONS PROVIDED FOR BY CITY OF AUBURN ORDINANCEVIII. IMPACT FEE MODIFICATIONS PROVIDED FOR BY CITY OF KENT ORDINANCEoJ,JYC.6 /$16,325.80Multi-Family4 & 5 BedroomMulti-Family IThree Bedrooml$14,325.80Multi-FamilyTwo Bedroom$11,325.80UJMulti-FamilyOne Bedroom$8,325.80Multi-FamilyStudio$6,325.80PER UNIT IMPACT FEESSingleFamilv$6,456.31FEERECAPSUMMARY$2,332.71$2'r ,833. 1 5$228.55($s,554.72)$4,040.26$37,815.02$348.98($6,156.78)$4,040.26$37,815.02$348.98($6,1 56.78)$37,815.02$348.98($6,156.78)$37,815.02$348.98($6,156.78)$37,815.02$348.98($6,156.78)040.26395.040.26395.87927ax Creditporary Facility CostsMatch CreditSite CostsPermanent Facility Const Costs$12,9',t2.61$6,456.31$0.00$0.00$32,651.61$16,325.80$5,000.00$o.ooFEE (No Discount)FEE (50% Discount)Less ASD DiscountFacility Credit$32,651.61$16,325.80$10,000.00$0.00$32,651.61$16,325"80$8,000.00$0.00$32,651.61 $32,651.61$16,325.80 $16,325.80$2,000.00 $0.00$0.00 $0.00Net Fee ObligationMultipleFamily$9,193.80PER UNIT IMPACT FEESSingleFamilv$6.456.31FEERECAPSUMMARYSite CostsPermanent Facility Const CostsTemporary Facility CostsState Match CreditTax Credit$2,332.71$21,833.15$228.55($3,554.72)($7,927.08)$37,815.02$348.98($6,156.78)($3,395.87),040.26$+FEE (No Discount)FEE (50% Discount)City of Kent lmpact Fee CapFacility Credit$12,912.61$6,456.31$0.00$0.00$32,651.61$16,325.80$7,132.00$0.00Net Fee Obligation35
Auburn School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2020 through 2026
Section Vlll
Appendices
Appendix A.1 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections
Appendix A.2 - Student Generation Survey
Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
En rol I ment Projections
Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-April 2020BASE DATA. BUILDOUT SCHEDULEASSUMPTIONS:1 Uses Build Out estimates received from developers.2 Student Generation Factors are updated Auburn data for 2020 as allowed per King County OrdinanceectedProStudent Generation FactorsMulti-Family0.43300.'18500.1 750SingleFamilyAuburn Factors2020 sF 2020MFElementaryMiddle School0.25000.13100.15200.7930hSenior0.5330TotalTotal978978245128149521774774335143135614175258027128411352026Single Familv Units50145155140140140208208522732Total K-12277783757575111MultiFamiUnits726242400000000020s5227321112026-275802712841 1352025140351B2100000140351821752025-265282442521024202414035182100000140351821752024-25493226231950202314035'182100000140351821752023-244582072108752022155392024241044191794925281022022-234231891898002021145361922241044'19169472326962021-22374164'1616992020501378726314134127576??63271411356022020-21327141135602TablelAuburn S.D.lDevetopment1Totalle FamilUnitsElemils K-5Mid School Pupils 6-8Sr. High Pupils 9-12Total Multi Family Unitsjected PupiElementary Pupils K-5Mid School Pupils 6-8Sr. High Pupils 9-12Total K-12Total Housing UnitsElementary Pupils K-5Mid School Pupils 6-8Sr. High Pupils 9-12Total K-12Cumulative ProiectionElementary-GradesK-5MidSchool -Grades6-8Senior High - Grades 9 - 12Total3B
Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey
SINGLE FAMILYAuburn School DistrictDevelopment Growth since 1/1/15May 2O2Q (Based on Oct 1, 2019 Enrollment)FeederElementaryElementary 16llalkoAurthur JacobsenEverqreen HtsLea HillEveroreen HtsLea HillElementarv 16Bowman CreekBowman CreekBowman CreekBowman CreekBowman CreekChinookEverqreen Hts.Everqreen Hts.AloacAurthur JacobsenLea HillHazelwoodTerminal ParkElementarv 16To BeOccupied002500300000001400130007163GurrentOccupancv281335515167221061306636899814238553306913110I 855Units/Parcels28'1338015161022106130663689981182385516306913811'19'r8Year of FullOccupancy2016201820182018201820152015201720152018201520162018201920172017Development NameAlicia GlennAnthem(formerlv Meqan's Meadows)BridqesCanvon CreekDulcineaHastinqsHazel ViewKendall RidqeLakeland East PortolaLakeland Hills EstatesEdqeview at Lakeland HillsLakeland: Pinnacle EstatesVillas at Lakeland HillsLozier RanchMonterev ParkMountain ViewOmnia Palisades PlateSeremounteSonata HillsSpencer PlaceVasiliyWillow PlaceActual StudentsTotal2919157473020551014017110752010913220202004989HS13157I004143211502470297188304282Middle104319208132684032150300152700243Elem6146929108284321815130050607101000464Student Generation FactorsTotal1.0361.462o.4420.3110.5000.0000.9090.5190.7770.6060.4651.0810.6420.0000.4580.2360.6670.6670.2901.5380.0000.4000.533HS0.464o.0770.16'10.0600.0000.000oj820.132o.2460.1670.1 360.2420.0860.0000.1220.1270.3330.2670.116o.2310.0000.4000.152Middle0.3570.3080.0870.0600.3330.0000.3640.1230.2000.1210.1090.3230.1 850.0000.1260.0000.3330.1 670.0290.5380.0000.0000.131Elem0.2141.0770.1 940.1920.1670.0000.3640.2640.3310.3'180.2200.5150.3700.0000.2100.1 090.0000.233o.1450.7690.0000.0000.250Totals40
SINGLE FAMILY-- 2020 and beyond* currently under constructionAuburn School DistrictDevelopment Growth since 1/1/15May 2O2Q (Based on Oct 1 , 2019 Enrollment)TotalsTo BeOccupied147181017302561411104674434130663978CurrentOccupancy00000000000000001 855Units/Parcels147181017302561411104674434130619182833Development NameAnderson AcresBackbone RidgeBridle EstatesHastinqs 10 *GreenvaleLakeland: Forest Glen AtLakeland: Park RidqeLakeland: River Rock*Pacific LaneRidqe At Tall TimbersRichardson BLfuPlatHuntionton Woodsf opaz Short PlatOxbow AcresWyncrest llWesport CapitalCurrent Partiallv Occupied DevelopmentsEstimated Students Based onStudent Generation FactorsTotal74105161367b55339222216334521HS2132353922161111064710149Middle212124342114110105408128Elem4253486443262191110771624541
MULTI FAMILY2020 and beyondTotalsAuburn School DistrictDevelopment Growth since 1/1/15May 2020 (Based on October 1,2019 Enrollment)FeederElementaryLea HillWashinqtonTotalTo BeOccupied000CurrentOccupancy294295589Units/Parcels294295589Year of FullOccupancy20182018Development NamePromenade AptsThe Villas at AuburnActual StudentsTotal39374467HS9013103Middle9B11109Elem20550255Student Generation FactorsTotal1.337o.2510.793HS0.3060.0440.175Middle0.3330.0370.185Elem0.6970.1690.433To BeOccupied482265000774CurrentOccupancy000589Units/Parcels482265005891363Sundallen CondosAuburn Town Center AptCopper Gate Apt.Current Partially Occupied DevelopmentsEstimated Students Based onStudent Generation Factors381793960614840870135942930143219B216033542
School District Capital Facilities Plans
General Statistics
School District:Kent Federal Way Auburn Hiqhline
Student Generation Rates
=E(I'IL
I
-og)ca
Elementary
Middle
Senior High
.334(v)
.078(v)
,117(v)
0.180s(4)
0.06e1(v)
0.0e87(v)
0.2s0(4.)
0.131(4)
0.1s2(4.)
n/a (did
not submit
this year)
t
E(I'IL
I
r=
:l
=
Elementary
Middle
Senior High
.117(-)
.028(-)
.048(4)
0.s064(v)
0.2s23(v)
0.2s23(v)
0.433(4)
0.18s(4.)
0.17s(4)
n/a (did
not submit
this year)
Enrollment 2OL9-202O 25,913(4)21,584(V)17,300(4)nla
eladsified Proof
Client
Address
238398 - City of Kent, City Clerk - LEGAL ADS
220 Fourth Ave S
Kent, WA, 98032
Phone
E-Mail
Fs
(2s3) 8s6-s728
kkomoto@kentwa.gov
Order#
Classifioation
StartDate
End Date
Run Dates
Publication(s)
9 l 3880
3030 - Legal Notices
1t/20/2020
1U20/2020
I
Kent Reporter
Requested'$r,KIM KOMOTO
PO# ORDS 43"11-4382
CreatedBy 8280
Creation Date ll/17/2020, 0l:04:24 pm
Order Price
Tax t
Tax 2
Total Net
Payment
$338.73
$0.00
$0.00
$338.73
$0.00
Salos Rep 9470 - Jennifer Tribbeu Phone
E-Mail
Fax
(360) 802-8212
jtribbett@courierherald.com
Proofed by Jennifer Tribbett, ll/17/2020 0l:05:18 pm Page: I
Clqccifierl Prnnf\-/lt lrJ\t.t .l.ll/\l r r \-r\-rl-
CITYOF KENT
NOTICE OF
ORDINANCES
PASSED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL
The following are sum-
maries of ordinances
passed by the Kent City
Council on November
17,2020.
ORDINANCE NO. ,(l71
-AN ORDINANCE ofthe
City Council of the Cityof Kent, Washington,
amending the Compre-
hensive Plan Land Use
Plan Map designationsin compliance with the
requirements of the
Growth Management Act
(cPA-2019-04,
cPA-2019-05,
cPA-2019-06).
This ordinance shall take
effect and be in force 30
days from and after its
passage, as provided by
law.
ORDINANCE No. iB74
- AN ORDINANCE ol
lhe City Council of the
Cig of Kent, Washing-
ton, amending sections7.01.070. 7.02.230.
7.03.030, 7.04.220, and
7.05.130 of the Kent City
Code to ohange the cal-
culation of lifeline utility
rates for water, sewer,
storm and surface water
drainage, and to make
other minor technical
changes within those
same code sections.
This ordinance shall take
effect and be in force 30
days after the date of its
passage as provided for
by RCW 35A.1 1.090 and
RCW 354.12.130; how-
ever, the new authorized
lifeline utility rates in
Sections 1,2, 4, and 5
will not be
utility charges
ary 1,2021.
ORDINANCE
applied to
until Janu-
NO. 4375
- AN ORDINANCE of
Proofed by Jennifer Tribbett, ll/17/2020 0l:05:18 pm Page:2
elaSsified Proof
the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washing-
ton, approving the con-
solidating budget adjust-
ments made between
July 1, 202O and Sep-
tember 30, 2020, refleit-
ing an overall budget de-
crease of $4,338,400.
This ordinanoe shall take
effect and be in force
fve days after its publi-
cation as provided for by
RCW 35A.11.090 and
RCW35A.'12.130.
ORDINANCE NO. 4376
- AN ORDINANCE ol
the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washing-
ton, amending the Kent
Comprehensive Plan
and its Capital Facilities
Element to reflect a six-year Capital lmprove-
ment Program for capitalimprovement projects
(2021 -2026) (CPA-2020-
2').
This ordinance shall take
effect and be in force 30
days from and after its
passage, as provided by
law.
ORDINANCE NO. 4377
- AN ORDINANCE of
the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washing-
ton, amending the KentComprehensive Plan
and its Capital Facilities
Element to include the
Capital Faoilities Plansof the Kent, Federal
Way, and Aubum SchoolDistricts for the202012021 through
202512026 school vears
(cPA-2020-1 ).
This ordinance will take
efiect and be in force 30
days from and after its
passage, as provided by
law.
ORDINANCE NO. 4378
- AN ORDINANCE ol
the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washing-ton, amending Section
12.13.160 of the Kenl
City Code to adjust the
school impact fee sched-
ules (CPA-2020-1).
This ordinance shall take
effeot and be in force 30
days from and after its
passage, as provided by
law.
ORDINANCE NO. 4379
- AN ORDINANCE ol
the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washing-
ion, amending the KentComprehensive Plan
and its Utilities Element
to include the 2019 Wa-ter System Plan
(cPA-2020-3).
This ordinance shall take
effect and be in force 30
days from and after its
passage, as provided by
law.
ORDINANCE NO. 4:I8O
- AN ORDINANCE ot
the City Council of theCig of Kent, Washing-
ton, levying 2020 proper-
ty taxes for the first year
ofthe 2021 -2O22bien-nial budget for the City
of Kent.
This ordinance shall take
effect and be in force
Proofed by Jennifer Tribbett, ll/17/2020 0l:05:18 pm Page:3
Classified Proof
lve oays atter me oate
of its publication as pro-
vided for by RCW
35A.11.090 and RCW
35A.12.130; however,
the property tax levied
through this ordinance
shall not be assessed for
collection until January
1,2021.
ORDINANCE NO. r$81
- AN ORDINANCE ofthe
Cig Council of the City
of Kent, Washington, re-
lating to budgets and fi-
nance and adopting the
{tnal 2021 -2O22 biennial
bddget.
This ordinance shall take
effect and be in force
five days after the date
of its publication as pro-
vided for by RCW
35A.11.090 and RCW
354.12.130; however,the budget authorized
through this ordinance
shall be effective Janu-
ary 1,2021.
ORDINANCE /til82 - AN
ORDINANCE of the City
Council of the City ol
Kent, Washington, made
necessary as a result o{
COVID-19 restaurant
closures, restricting res-
taurant delivery and
pickup fees charged by
third-party, application-
based food delivery plat-
forms and prohibiling re-
ductions in compensa-tion rates paid to
delivery drivers.
This ordinance shall take
effect and be in force be-
ginning Friday, Novern'
bet 20, 2020, at 11:59
pm.
A copy of
text of any
be mailed
of the City
the complete
ordinance will
upon request
Clerk.
Kimbedey A. Komoto,
City Clerk
Kkomoto@KentWA.gov
253-856-5725
#9'13880
11t20r24
Proofed by Jennifer Tribbett, llll712020 0l:05:18 pm Page: 4