The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity Council Committees - Operations Committee - 05/06/2008 Operations Committee Agenda Councilmembers: Debbie Raplee*Les Thomas*Tim Clark, Chair Unless otherwise noted, the Operations Committee meets at 4:00 p.m. on the 1st and 3rd Tuesdays of each month. Council Chambers East, Kent City Hall, 220 4th Avenue South, Kent, 98032-5895. Dates and times are subject to change. For information please contact Renee Cameron at (253) 856-5770. Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City Clerk’s Office at (253) 856-5725 in advance. For TDD relay service call the Washington Telecommunications Relay Service at 1- 800-833-6388. May 6, 2008 4:00 p.m. Item Description Action Speaker Time Page 1. Approval of minutes dated April 15, 2008 YES 1 2. Approval of vouchers dated YES Bob Nachlinger 05 Min. April 1 through April 15th and April 16th through April 30th, 2008 3. Consulting Service Agreement for East Hill Data Center Design – Authorize YES Mike Carrington 05 Min. 5 4. Microsoft Enterprise License YES John Humphreys 05 Min 16 Agreement - Authorize 5. Federal Legislative Consultant YES Ben Wolters 05 Min 18 - Authorize 6. Kent Events Center Traffic and YES Ben Wolters 05 Min 31 Parking Management Plan - Authorize 7. Puget Sound Energy Easement for YES Tom Brubaker 05 Min 47 Kent Events Center - Authorize 8. 1st Quarter Financial Report NO Bob Nachlinger 10 Min. 55 for informational purpose only This page intentionally left blank 1 2 3 4 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT Mike Carrington, Director Phone: 253-856-4607 Fax: 253-856-4700 Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, WA. 98032-5895 May 6, 2008 TO: Kent City Council – Operations Committee FROM: Mike Carrington, Information Technology Director SUBJECT: Kent East Hill Data Center Design Consulting Services MOTION: Move to recommend Council authorize Mayor Cooke to sign a contract with ISMS, Inc. for design services rendered in support of the East Hill Data Center, for an amount not to exceed $49,000 (plus expenses). SUMMARY: In conjunction with the Public Works Department and their East Hill Shops capital facilities project, ISMS, Inc. under the direct supervision of IT will design and specify requirements for a data center occupying approximately 2000 square feet of that project’s Administrative building footprint. The City’s current data center is located in City Hall on the second floor. In the event of a natural or man-made disaster, and because the current data center is considered to be in a high risk location within the valley, IT has partnered with Public Works to establish a new location at the proposed East Hill Shops facility. This will enable IT to move the City’s critical computer processing and business system infrastructure to a location above the existing valley floor and flood zones. This move also enables Kent to enhance its ability to operate basic life and safety functions during an emergency and/or disaster. Moving equipment and operations to higher ground improves the likelihood of maintaining seamless business continuity and disaster recovery communication channels. It also improves the ability for our critical business systems to remain functional or at a minimum be brought back to basic operations in the least amount of time. ISMS, Inc. will provide data center physical design services that are determined by the IT Department to be appropriate for meeting our current and future needs. BUDGET IMPACT: Funding for related services is outlined in the 2008 Technology Plan. Pending formal approval by Council of the Tech Plan in June, existing funds from the 2007 Interim Tech Plan will be transferred to this project. EXHIBITS: Attached 5 This page intentionally left blank Data Center Design Proposal for The City of Kent, WA Mike Carrington IT Director City of Kent 220 Fourth Ave South Kent, WA 98032 Pho: 253-856-4607 email: MCarrington@ci.kent.wa.us March 18, 2008 Think Beyond Broadband™ Proprietary & Confidential ™ 6 2 March 18, 2008 Think Beyond Broadband™ City of Kent, WA Data Center Design Proposal Ta b l e o f Co n T e n T s Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................3 About Data Center Design ...................................................................................................................3 The ISMS Approach .........................................................................................................................3 Scope of Work & Deliverables for this Proposal ..................................................................................4 Included In This Scope Of Work ......................................................................................................4 Excluded From This Scope Of Work ...............................................................................................4 The Process ...........................................................................................................................................5 Basic Steps .......................................................................................................................................5 Fee Proposal .........................................................................................................................................5 Contract Fees ..................................................................................................................................5 Time and Materials Billing ...............................................................................................................5 Hourly Fee Schedule .......................................................................................................................5 Expenses ..........................................................................................................................................6 Payment Terms ................................................................................................................................6 Schedule ..........................................................................................................................................6 Closing Remarks ..............................................................................................................................6 Sample Data Center Design (Conceptual-For Reference Only) ...........................................................7 Letter of Engagement ..........................................................................................................................8 7 3 March 18, 2008 Think Beyond Broadband™ City of Kent, WA Data Center Design Proposal I n T r o d u C T I o n Kent, WA has begun a new initiative to improve communica- tions networking throughout the City. Part of this initiative involves the design and construction of a new data center facil- ity. This data center is required to support all present network communications as well as be expandable to accept any new network initiatives such as a potential future Fiber-to-the-Home initiative and deployment. In order to facilitate the design of the data center and ensure its expandability and performance, Kent, WA has asked Information Systems Management Solutions, Inc. (ISMS) to provide design assistance for this facility as outlined in this proposal. We understand that an architectural firm has already been retained by the City of Kent for the data center building design. ISMS has been asked to provide interior design specifications and required drawings to the City’s architect for the Data Center portion of the building. a b o u T da T a Ce n T e r de s I g n There are a number of issues regarding data center design that are important and worth noting. Data center design is about conceptualization, expandability, scalability, long term growth, operations, maintenance, emer- gencies, personnel, customer support, distribution of services, customer expectations, and much more. ISMS takes all these topics into consideration when completing a comprehensive data center design. A data center is, in most cases, only one of four interconnected facilities... The Data Center: network switching, routing, & • services equipment, data storage, SAN’s, servers, test equipment, etc. The NOC (Network Operations Center): operations • area from which technical support people operate & configure the network and is normally the location for field support customer service personnel. The Head End: the technical facility where all incom-• ing services are aggregated onto the network, such as Internet access, video services, VoIP phones, personal PC’s, etc. T h e IsMs ap p r o a C h ISMS firmly believes that a careful, considered, and comprehen- sive up-front data center design, along with all technical support facilities, is the least expensive and most effective way to ensure long term, reliable service from the facility. A comprehensive data center design must start by determining where these three facilities are located and how they are inter- connected. In many designs, all three are located within the same facility, even within the same physical space. In other designs, the NOC, for example, may be located in a completely different location from the data center, etc. ISMS begins a data center design by first determining the answers to these questions based on client preferences, operational issues, support personnel, etc. Once those decisions have been made, ISMS can proceed with a comprehensive design of the data center, including support facilities such as maintenance & testing, storage, staging, etc. 8 4 March 18, 2008 Think Beyond Broadband™ City of Kent, WA Data Center Design Proposal s C o p e o f Wo r k & de l I v e r a b l e s f o r T h I s pr o p o s a l ISMS will provide a data center physical design to the City of Kent that is appropriate to meet the current and future needs of the City, including the following specific details. These details will be provided to the City’s chosen building architect as text specifications and to-scale drawings as appropriate for the archi- tect’s inclusion in the overall building construction drawing set. I n C l u d e d In Th I s sC o p e of Wo r k Conceptual Scope of the Data Center including location • and interconnection of Date Center, NOC, and Head- End Consideration of any LEED Certification initiatives that • the City wishes to pursue for this building Support facilities to be included in the design will be • maintenance, staging, storage, and any facilities visitor considerations Description of technology, hardware, and equipment • types to be located within the data center, both initially and future Interior floor plans and physical layout drawings• Interior acoustical surface treatments specifications• Interior lighting design and specifications• Computer flooring design and specifications (if raised • flooring is to be used) HVAC and humidity specifications, potential heat • loads from all sources, and thermal patterns, including all requirements for HVAC including air flow, cooling capacities, and emergency backup Electrical supply requirements including filtered power; • lighting, surge, and noise protection; and grounding specifications DC equipment power requirements and specifications • including a complete DC power design (if DC power is to be utilized) Backup power requirements to support technical sys-• tems, including cooling and minimum lighting Specifications for security and facility access control• Specifications for facility monitoring, such as fire, water • incursion, thermal monitoring, power fluctuation moni- toring, etc. Specifications for fire suppression methodology and • design Ceiling specifications• Wiring pathway specifications, cabling troughs, and • installation specifications Maintenance area specifications• Storage area specifications• Plumbing requirements & design (if any are required)• Interior equipment rack layouts and specifications • including cooling, grounding, mounting, assembly, elec- trical requirement, etc. All facility furniture requirements, in addition to equip-• ment racks, including such items as stationary and portable work surfaces, cabinets, tables, seating, test benches, etc. All conduit and access placements and specifications• Specifications for ingress and egress from the facility to • outside services All required on-site meetings with Kent IT personnel • and architects to complete the data center design All deliverables including written specifications, draw-• ings, documents, photographs, samples, and any other items required to ensure the accurate and complete transfer of information to the building architectural firm and/or contractors If the NOC and Head End are to be included in the same physi- F cal location as the Data Center, ISMS will include the NOC and Head End design within this scope of work. Should one or more be remotely located, ISMS will provide an update to this scope of work to include those separate facilities as well. e x C l u d e d fr o M Th I s sC o p e of Wo r k The following items are specifically excluded from the Scope of Work outlined in this proposal. ISMS is happy to provide sub- sequent proposals for any or all of the excluded items at a future date at the request of the City. Completion of any RFP’s or RFQ’s for the construction • and installation of the data center and/or associated facilities On-site construction or technical installation services• Detailed electronic and network systems design (this • proposal covers only the physical and environmental de- sign of the data center. The electronic network systems design is the subject of a separate proposal. On-site construction oversight and/or project manage-• ment over and above the required site visits to ensure accurate design implementation 9 5 March 18, 2008 Think Beyond Broadband™ City of Kent, WA Data Center Design Proposal T h e pr o C e s s ISMS executives and staff have many years of data center, as well as other technical facility design expertise and experience. Comprehensive data center design is a process of making a set of decisions, followed by another set of decisions, etc. Each set of decisions must be made with enough experience and expertise to facilitate the next set of decisions that must be made, etc. The design process requires extensive experience and broad expertise in multiple disciplines to ensure a successful design. (Specific ISMS design skill sets and personnel resumes will be provided upon request.) b a s I C sT e p s 1. Required initial meeting with City staff and designated architect to review general data center principals, facility locations, building size and other restrictions, environmental and construction issues, and action items 2. ISMS will then provide a preliminary conceptual drawing to the City and architect for approval along with a time-line of required decisions and milestones 3. Once conceptual design is approved, ISMS will complete all appropriate drawings and specifica- tions to be provided to the City architect 4. ISMS will review first draft architectural drawings and provide any necessary comments or clarifica- tion with regards to the data center design 5. On-site visits will be made by ISMS personnel as required to ensure strict adherence to design drawings and specifications by all construction and installation contractors f e e pr o p o s a l Kent, WA agrees to provide ISMS with all requested informa- tion on a timely basis. If not provided, additional charges may be incurred for ISMS to research or procure required information externally. C o n T r a C T fe e s ISMS will complete the scope of work as outlined in this pro- posal for a contract fee of: $ 48,937.00 (plus expenses)• The contract fee is based on completing the scope of work within 6 months of engagement. If the scope of work requires longer than 6 months to complete, due to delays by the City, ISMS reserves the option to negotiate in good faith, a fair adjustment to the ISMS fees based on the additional amount of time required to complete the scope of work. T I M e a n d Ma T e r I a l s bI l l I n g (fo r ad d I T I o n a l se r v I C e s ou T s I d e T h e s C o p e o f Th I s pr o p o s a l ) Please Note: The following hourly fees are only available to con- F tracted clients of ISMS. Standard ISMS hourly consulting fees are somewhat higher and categorized differently h o u r l y fe e sC h e d u l e This hourly fee structure will remain valid through June 30, 2008. Should the ISMS hourly fee schedule increase after 06/30/08, ISMS will provide a minimum of 30 days advance notice before any such increase takes effect. Support - Clerical, Staff Support, Basic Web Research, Data Collection & Entry, Documentation, etc., involving task oriented work by trained and qualified personnel. Hourly Rate - $ 40.00 per hour (plus expenses)• Drafting/CAD – Drafting Services, Drawings, CAD Hourly Rate - $ 60.00 per hour (plus expenses)• Project Coordinator – In-house project coordination, handling paperwork, workflow, scheduling, billing releases, and client support. Hourly Rate - $ 75.00 per hour (plus expenses)• 10 6 March 18, 2008 Think Beyond Broadband™ City of Kent, WA Data Center Design Proposal p a y M e n T Te r M s An initial 50% deposit of the contract fee is due simultaneously with the completion of the Letter of Engagement and before work begins. ISMS services covered under this proposal are billed at the end of each month based on work completed and is due and payable Net 15 days from date of invoice. The initial deposit amount is applied to the final ISMS invoices upon completion of the scope of work. Expenses are billed every two weeks and are due and payable Net 15 days from date of invoice. Late fees of 1-1/2% per month will be added on any outstanding invoice balance which has not paid by the due date. ISMS will issue a project termination letter at the end of the project to inform you that the project has been completed and no further work will be done under this proposal. s C h e d u l e Completion of the scope of work, after receipt of letter of engage- ment and deposit payment, is anticipated to be approximately 90-120 days. C l o s I n g re M a r k s ISMS is very grateful for the opportunity to be of service to Kent, WA. You will receive the ISMS staff’s highest priority and atten- tion. ISMS can begin work immediately upon receipt of the signed Letter of Engagement (enclosed in this proposal) and deposit payment. Our very best regards, W. James Hettrick Chairman Bob Todrank Executive Vice President Project Manager – On-site and in-house project manage- ment, skilled and experienced in problem resolution, on-site work reviews, on-site instructions and directions, etc. Hourly Rate - $ 110.00 per hour (plus expenses)• Designer/Senior Project Manager – Executive level project management by an individual skilled and experienced in complete network & communications utility design, deploy- ment, construction, operations, scheduling, and client support. Hourly Rate - $ 150.00 per hour (plus expenses)• Principal – A founder or principal of ISMS applying their advanced vision, technical expertise, and industry leadership to accelerate the project imperatives, create partnerships, provide options, and design business models. Hourly Rate - $ 250.00 per hour (plus expenses)• As a matter of policy, ISMS utilizes the most economical catego- ry of personnel for each portion of the project task based on the requirements of that task. The charges for our work are based on the actual time spent and calculated at our hourly rates, rounded up to the nearest 1/2 hour interval. Travel time to and from the development location, when re- quired, is billed at one-half the normal hourly/daily rate. This proposal expires 60 days after the issue date. F e x p e n s e s Only additional expenses incurred directly on behalf of ISMS F clients are billable to those clients. All internal ISMS expenses in- cluding office & equipment, insurance, and other internal expenses are not billable to clients. All direct expenses incurred specifically on behalf of our clients will be billed additionally at the actual amount incurred. No handling surcharges are added to expenses. Billable client expenses include the following: Travel Expenses Postage and Freight Outside Architectural Fees (if any) Plan Submittal Fees (if any) Printing, Computer Discs, etc. (if any) Authorized Purchases Directly for the Client Communications Expense (over and above normal telephone, e-mail, & fax) 11 7 March 18, 2008 Think Beyond Broadband™ City of Kent, WA Data Center Design Proposal s a M p l e da T a Ce n T e r de s I g n (Co n C e p T u a l -fo r re f e r e n C e on l y ) The following artist rendering is provided as a conceptualization of what a data center might look like with an integrated NOC in the upper right corner. Every data center design is unique and must fit the requirements of each individual situation. 12 8 March 18, 2008 Think Beyond Broadband™ City of Kent, WA Data Center Design Proposal LETTER OF ENGAGEMENT This Letter of Engagement (“LOE or Agreement”) is made and entered into effective this ____________ day of _________________________________, 2008 by and between the City of Kent, WA with offices at 220 Fourth Ave. South, Kent, WA 98032 (“CLIENT”) and Information Systems Management Solutions, Inc. with offices at 300 East State Street, Suite 470, Redlands, CA 92373 (“ISMS”). RECITALS The parties agree as follows: Both parties have read and agreed to the scope of work, fee schedule, and payment terms as presented in the Data Center Design Proposal to A. Kent, WA dated March 18, 2008 of which this LOE is a part. ISMS agrees to make all reasonable efforts to ensure the best possible project results for the CLIENT.B. ISMS agrees to keep reports, records, research, time-sheets, and other documentation pertinent to this LOE confidential and to make them C. available to the CLIENT via secure access to the ISMS web site, by the e-mailing of electronic files, or both methods as requested by the CLIENT. The CLIENT has the ultimate responsibility for outlining the necessary and expected outcomes of this Agreement. ISMS has the responsibili-D. ty of providing timely and accurate information, communications, and results in fulfilling the established objectives and tasks of this agreement. This responsibility includes the maintenance of adequate records and internal controls and the safeguarding of accomplished tasks. This engagement can- not be relied upon to disclose every potential problem in the relationship; however, both parties agree to notify each other immediately if any such matters come to their attention. Both parties have confidence that the relationship between ISMS and CLIENT will greatly benefit both parties. The CLIENT agrees that all records, documentation, and information in its possession pertinent to this agreement will be made available to E. ISMS, and ISMS agrees to make all relevant records, documentation, communications and information pertinent to this agreement available to CLI- ENT. Both parties agree that all material information will be disclosed to one another and that ISMS will have the full cooperation of the CLIENT’s personnel, under direction of its Principal, for the efficient and effective completion of the requested services. ISMS will provide proof of comprehensive liability and automotive insurance, with the CLIENT named as additional insured if requested.F. Both parties agree to respect the proprietary and confidential information of the other and shall take all reasonable steps to ensure that the G. proprietary and confidential information of the other remains confidential and does not pass into the public domain. It is agreed that no detailed in- formation regarding the project being completed under this agreement will be shared outside the two parties unless both parties agree in advance to the release of such information. It is also agreed that ISMS may post a notice of this relationship and agreement on their web site and provide notice to other potential clients that ISMS has a current contractual agreement with CLIENT. Unforeseen circumstances may arise which require either part to modify their efforts or withdraw from this LOE. To mitigate the effects of H. such circumstances, the reasons for modification or withdrawal will be communicated clearly to the other party. Both parties agree to work in good faith to avoid any decay or premature termination in the relationship. Additional Exhibits or Addendum to this LOE which may be required from time to time shall be signed by both parties and shall be incorpo-I. rated into this LOE by reference. This LOE shall remain in effect until terminated by either party with 30 days written notice. Upon notice of termination, the parties will J. review all work in progress and jointly determine what, if any, work in progress is to be completed before termination becomes effective. All such designated work shall be completed by ISMS as quickly as reasonably possible and the effective date of termination shall be the completion date of said work. Invoices for all ISMS work completed prior to the effective date of termination shall be due and payable by CLIENT. The parties are independent organizations and nothing shall be construed which would place the parties in the relationship of partners or K. joint venturers. Neither party shall have the power to obligate or bind the other in any manner whatsoever; and neither is authorized to, nor shall, act as the agent of the other, except for the express purpose of carrying out the obligations required under this Agreement. In no event will either party be liable to the other for any lost profits, lost savings, or any other incidental, special, or consequential damages, L. even if such party has been advised of the possibility of such damages, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement. Each party shall be free to bring all differences of interpretation and disputes arising in connection with this Agreement to the attention of M. the other party at any time without prejudicing their harmonious relationship, and the offices and facilities of either party shall be available at all times for the prompt and effective resolution of any and all such differences, either by mail, e-mail, telephone, or personal meeting under friendly and courteous circumstances. The parties shall mediate any dispute or claim arising between them out of this Agreement or any resulting transaction before resorting to N. court action. Mediation is a process by which parties attempt to resolve a dispute or claim by submitting it to an impartial, neutral mediator, who is agreed upon by the parties and authorized to facilitate the resolution of the dispute, but who is not empowered to impose a settlement on the parties. Mediation fees, if any, shall be divided equally between the parties. Evidence of anything said, any admission made, and any documents l e T T e r o f en g a g e M e n T 13 9 March 18, 2008 Think Beyond Broadband™ City of Kent, WA Data Center Design Proposal prepared, in the course of the mediation shall not be admissible in evidence, or subject to discovery, in any court action pursuant to Evidence Code Section 1152.5. Except for a petition for a temporary restraining order based on a reasonable claim of irreparable harm, if any party hereto commences a court action without first attempting to resolve the matter through mediation, then that party hereby waives the right to and shall not be entitled to recover attorney’s fees, even if they would otherwise be available to that party. Any waiver of a term or covenant of this Agreement shall be effective only in the specific instance and for the specific purpose and shall be O. stated in writing. The failure of either party at any time to require performance of any provision hereof shall in no manner affect the rights at a later time to enforce the same. No waiver by either party of the breach of any term or covenant contained in this Agreement shall be deemed to be a con- tinuing waiver of any such breach of any other term or covenant contained in this Agreement. Any provision of this Agreement which is found to be unenforceable under any law in any jurisdiction in which this Agreement is effective P. shall be deemed severable and not a part of this Agreement and to that extent void in the relevant jurisdiction. However, all remaining provisions of this Agreement shall be valid and in full force and effect, and the parties shall negotiate in good faith a replacement provision which effects, insofar as possible the original intent of the parties with respect to the subject matter of the severed provision. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of California in the United States of America, without regard Q. to choice of laws and conflict of laws rules. In any litigation arising out of any dispute between the parties concerning this Agreement, venue shall be the federal and state courts situated in Los Angeles County, California, and each of the parties hereby expressly consents, accepts and submits to the jurisdiction of said courts. In the event either party is prevented from performing or is unable to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement due to fire, floods, R. state of war, governmental regulation, national emergency, strikes, lockouts, labor troubles, failure of public utilities, injunctions, or any other event beyond the reasonable control of the party affected, the affected party shall give notice promptly to the other party in writing and, thereupon, the affected party’s non-performance shall be excused for the period of delay or inability due to such Force Majeure, but not for more than one (1) year. This Agreement is the result of arms-length negotiation by experienced and knowledgeable parties wherein each party is represented by legal S. counsel, and the language herein shall not be strictly construed against either party. Each of the parties to this Agreement has performed its own due diligence obligations with regard to the subject matter hereof, and except as T. expressly provided herein, each of the parties shall be solely responsible for its own conduct, and nothing herein shall otherwise cause either party to be answerable for any conduct of the other hereunder. Each of the parties to this Agreement shall bear all costs and expenses incidental to such party’s performance of its obligations under this U. Agreement and shall be solely responsible for the acts, salaries and expenses of its employees. The parties shall take any further actions, and shall make, execute, and deliver any further written instruments, that may reasonably be re-V. quired to carry out the intent of the parties as expressed herein, and to implement the purposes, and give force and effect to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. This Agreement may be amended, modified, or superseded, and the terms or covenants hereof may be waived, only by a written instrument W. executed by the parties, or in the case of a waiver, by the party waiving compliance. If the above terms are acceptable to Kent and the services outlined are in accordance with your understanding, please sign two copies of this LOE and return them to ISMS as soon as possible. ISMS will then sign and return one executed copy for Kent’s records. ISMS is pleased to have this opportunity to serve the Kent, WA and trusts that the association between ISMS and Kent will continue to be a pleas- ant, informative, useful, and profitable one for both parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this LOE to be executed, effective as of the Effective Date first written above. City Of Kent, WA Information Systems Management Solutions, Inc. By _________________________________________________________________ By ____________________________________________________________________________ Name _____________________________________________________________ Name ________________________________________________________________________ Title ______________________________________________________________ Title _________________________________________________________________________ 14 Think Beyond Broadband™ ™ Proprietary & Confidential 15 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Michael Carrington, Director Phone: 253-856-4600 Fax: 253-856-4700 Address: 220 Fourth Ave South Kent, Wa 98032-5895 May 6, 2008 TO: City Council Operations Committee FROM: John Humphreys, Systems Manager, Information Technology SUBJECT: Microsoft Enterprise License Agreement, 2008 MOTION: I move to recommend that the Council authorize the Mayor to sign a purchase order for a Microsoft Enterprise License Agreement for 3 years not to exceed a total commitment of $650,000. SUMMARY: The City has a number of Microsoft software products deployed throughout desktops and servers. Under this request, the city would sign a 3 year Enterprise License agreement with Microsoft to save 6% on software licensing that we already intend (and are budgeted) to purchase in the next 3 years. By entering a 3 year Enterprise License Agreement, the city would save at least 6% (or $39,000) over the price of that same software purchased without the agreement in place through next 3 year period (and substantially greater than 6% savings in following years). The Enterprise License Agreement also provides the benefit of Microsoft Software Assurance, an upgrade plan that provides Enterprise Agreement Customers the ability to move to the next major versions of licensed products at no cost. Software Assurance allows the IT Department to continue to meet its strategic goals of providing current, supported software products at the best possible cost. EXHIBITS: Microsoft Enterprise License Agreement 2008 BUDGET IMPACT: Operating & Tech Plan (within current overall IT budget allocation). Estimate: $649,626.53 16 17 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ben Wolters Phone: 253-856-5703 Fax: 253-856-6700 Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, WA. 98032-5895 May 6, 2008 TO: Kent City Council Operations Committee FROM: Ben Wolters, Economic Development Director THROUGH: Staff SUBJECT: VanNess Feldman, Attorneys at law, Federal Lobbyist Agreement MOTION: Recommend Council to authorize the Mayor to sign the Consultant Services Agreement with VanNess Feldman, Attorneys at Law representing the City of Kent as our Federal Lobbyist, not to exceed $70,000, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney. SUMMARY: The agreement with VanNess Feldman, Attorneys at law will be providing the City of Kent Federal representation with a particular emphasis on the Washington State Congressional delegation. This contract with VanNess Feldman, Attorneys at law will not exceed $70,000. The expenses incurred will be split between Economic Development and Public Works Department. VanNess will provide representation for funding for next years reauthorization of the Federal Transportation Reauthorization bill and the yearly discretionary appropriations bills for key grade separation and other transportation projects for Kent. Continued policy support for replacing the Green River levee system and a reasonable interim flood zone and flood insurance program. Also Federal funding and regulatory policy support for the Green/Duwamish Rivers Ecosystem Restoration and to restore Human Service and Community Development block grant funding and other federal opportunities and issues as they arise. If you have any questions prior to the meeting, please call Ben Wolters, 856- 5703. EXHIBITS: Attached BUDGET IMPACT: Yes 18 This page intentionally left blank CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT - 1 (Over $10,000) CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT between the City of Kent and VanNess Feldman THIS AGREEMENT is made between the City of Kent, a Washington municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City"), and VanNess, Attorneys at law, organized under the laws of the State of Washington DC, located and doing business at 1050 Thomas Jefferson Street N.W., Washington D.C., 20007-3877, (202) 298-1956 (hereinafter the "Consultant"). I. DESCRIPTION OF WORK. Consultant shall perform the following services for the City in accordance with the following described plans and/or specifications: VanNess Feldman is providing federal representation to the City of Kent, with particular emphasis on the Washington State Congressional delegation, as further described in Consultant’s work program attached and incorporated as Exhibit A. Consultant further represents that the services furnished under this Agreement will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices within the Puget Sound region in effect at the time those services are performed. II. TIME OF COMPLETION. The parties agree that work will begin on the tasks described in Section I above immediately upon the effective date of this Agreement. Upon the effective date of this Agreement, Consultant shall complete the work described in Section I within April 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008. III. COMPENSATION. A. The City shall pay the Consultant, based on time and materials, an amount not to exceed Seventy thousand dollars ($70,000) for the services described in this Agreement. This is the maximum amount to be paid under this Agreement for the work described in Section I above, and shall not be exceeded without the prior written authorization of the City in the form of a negotiated and executed amendment to this agreement. The Consultant agrees that the hourly or flat rate charged by it for its services contracted for herein shall remain locked at the negotiated rate(s) for a period of one (1) year from the effective date of this Agreement. The Consultant's billing rates shall be as delineated in Exhibit A. B. The Consultant shall submit monthly payment invoices to the City for work performed, and a final bill upon completion of all services described in this 19 Agreement. The City shall provide payment within forty-five (45) days of receipt of an invoice. If the City objects to all or any portion of an invoice, it shall notify the Consultant and reserves the option to only pay that portion of the invoice not in dispute. In that event, the parties will immediately make every effort to settle the disputed portion. IV. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The parties intend that an Independent Contractor-Employer Relationship will be created by this Agreement and that the Consultant has the ability to control and direct the performance and details of its work, the City being interested only in the results obtained under this Agreement. V. TERMINATION. Either party may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, upon providing the other party thirty (30) days written notice at its address set forth on the signature block of this Agreement. After termination, the City may take possession of all records and data within the Consultant’s possession pertaining to this project, which may be used by the City without restriction. If the City’s use of Consultant’s records or data is not related to this project, it shall be without liability or legal exposure to the Consultant. VI. DISCRIMINATION. In the hiring of employees for the performance of work under this Agreement or any subcontract, the Consultant, its subcontractors, or any person acting on behalf of the Consultant or subcontractor shall not, by reason of race, religion, color, sex, age, sexual orientation, national origin, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability, discriminate against any person who is qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates. Consultant shall execute the attached City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Policy Declaration, Comply with City Administrative Policy 1.2, and upon completion of the contract work, file the attached Compliance Statement. VII. INDEMNIFICATION. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the Consultant's performance of this Agreement, except for that portion of the injuries and damages caused by the City's negligence. The City's inspection or acceptance of any of Consultant's work when completed shall not be grounds to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers, the Consultant's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence. IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE INDEMNIFICATION PROVIDED HEREIN CONSTITUTES THE CONSULTANT'S WAIVER OF IMMUNITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE, TITLE 51 RCW, SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS INDEMNIFICATION. THE PARTIES FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED THIS WAIVER. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. S:\PUBLIC\CLERK\City Council Committee Packets\Operations\_050608\ED_VanNessConsultantSvcAgreement.doc 20 VIII. INSURANCE. The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance of the types and in the amounts described in Exhibit B attached and incorporated by this reference. IX. EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION. The City will provide its best efforts to provide reasonable accuracy of any information supplied by it to Consultant for the purpose of completion of the work under this Agreement. X. OWNERSHIP AND USE OF RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS. Original documents, drawings, designs, reports, or any other records developed or created under this Agreement shall belong to and become the property of the City. All records submitted by the City to the Consultant will be safeguarded by the Consultant. Consultant shall make such data, documents, and files available to the City upon the City’s request. The City’s use or reuse of any of the documents, data and files created by Consultant for this project by anyone other than Consultant on any other project shall be without liability or legal exposure to Consultant. XI. CITY'S RIGHT OF INSPECTION. Even though Consultant is an independent contractor with the authority to control and direct the performance and details of the work authorized under this Agreement, the work must meet the approval of the City and shall be subject to the City's general right of inspection to secure satisfactory completion. XII. WORK PERFORMED AT CONSULTANT'S RISK. Consultant shall take all necessary precautions and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and subcontractors in the performance of the contract work and shall utilize all protection necessary for that purpose. All work shall be done at Consultant's own risk, and Consultant shall be responsible for any loss of or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in connection with the work. XIII. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. A. Recyclable Materials. Pursuant to Chapter 3.80 of the Kent City Code, the City requires its contractors and consultants to use recycled and recyclable products whenever practicable. A price preference may be available for any designated recycled product. B. Non-Waiver of Breach. The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, or to exercise any option conferred by this Agreement in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of those covenants, agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect. C. Resolution of Disputes and Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. If the parties are unable to settle any dispute, difference or claim arising from the parties’ performance of this Agreement, the exclusive means of resolving that dispute, difference or claim, shall only be by filing suit exclusively under the venue, rules and jurisdiction of the King County Superior Court, King County, Washington, unless the parties agree in writing to an alternative dispute resolution process. In any claim or lawsuit for damages arising from the parties' performance of this Agreement, each party shall pay all its legal costs and attorney's fees incurred in defending or bringing such claim or lawsuit, including all appeals, in addition to any other recovery or award provided by law; provided, however, nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit the City's right to indemnification under Section VII of this Agreement. S:\PUBLIC\CLERK\City Council Committee Packets\Operations\_050608\ED_VanNessConsultantSvcAgreement.doc 21 D. Written Notice. All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the parties at the addresses listed on the signature page of the Agreement, unless notified to the contrary. Any written notice hereunder shall become effective three (3) business days after the date of mailing by registered or certified mail, and shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing. E. Assignment. Any assignment of this Agreement by either party without the written consent of the non-assigning party shall be void. If the non-assigning party gives its consent to any assignment, the terms of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and no further assignment shall be made without additional written consent. F. Modification. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the City and Consultant. G. Entire Agreement. The written provisions and terms of this Agreement, together with any Exhibits attached hereto, shall supersede all prior verbal statements of any officer or other representative of the City, and such statements shall not be effective or be construed as entering into or forming a part of or altering in any manner this Agreement. All of the above documents are hereby made a part of this Agreement. However, should any language in any of the Exhibits to this Agreement conflict with any language contained in this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. H. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant agrees to comply with all federal, state, and municipal laws, rules, and regulations that are now effective or in the future become applicable to Consultant's business, equipment, and personnel engaged in operations covered by this Agreement or accruing out of the performance of those operations. I. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, and all of which will together constitute this one Agreement. IN WITNESS, the parties below execute this Agreement, which shall become effective on the last date entered below. CONSULTANT: By: (signature) Print Name: Its (title) DATE: CITY OF KENT: By: (signature) Print Name: Suzette Cooke Its Mayor DATE: S:\PUBLIC\CLERK\City Council Committee Packets\Operations\_050608\ED_VanNessConsultantSvcAgreement.doc 22 NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: CONSULTANT: Ben McMakin VanNess Feldman 1050 Thomas Jefferson St., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20007-3877 (202) 298-1800 (telephone) (202) 338-2716 (facsimile) NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: CITY OF KENT: Ben Wolters, Economic Development Director City of Kent 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 (253) 856-5703 (telephone) (253) 856-6700 (facsimile) APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kent Law Department [In this field, you may enter the electronic filepath where the contract has been saved] S:\PUBLIC\CLERK\City Council Committee Packets\Operations\_050608\ED_VanNessConsultantSvcAgreement.doc 23 EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 1 DECLARATION CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY The City of Kent is committed to conform to Federal and State laws regarding equal opportunity. As such all contractors, subcontractors and suppliers who perform work with relation to this Agreement shall comply with the regulations of the City’s equal employment opportunity policies. The following questions specifically identify the requirements the City deems necessary for any contractor, subcontractor or supplier on this specific Agreement to adhere to. An affirmative response is required on all of the following questions for this Agreement to be valid and binding. If any contractor, subcontractor or supplier willfully misrepresents themselves with regard to the directives outlines, it will be considered a breach of contract and it will be at the City’s sole determination regarding suspension or termination for all or part of the Agreement; The questions are as follows: 1. I have read the attached City of Kent administrative policy number 1.2. 2. During the time of this Agreement I will not discriminate in employment on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, age, or the presence of all sensory, mental or physical disability. 3. During the time of this Agreement the prime contractor will provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer. 4. During the time of the Agreement I, the prime contractor, will actively consider hiring and promotion of women and minorities. 5. Before acceptance of this Agreement, an adherence statement will be signed by me, the Prime Contractor, that the Prime Contractor complied with the requirements as set forth above. By signing below, I agree to fulfill the five requirements referenced above. Dated this day of ____, 200__. By:___________________________________________ For: __________________________________________ Title: _________________________________________ Date: _________________________________________ 24 EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 2 CITY OF KENT ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY NUMBER: 1.2 EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 1998 SUBJECT: MINORITY AND WOMEN SUPERSEDES: April 1, 1996 CONTRACTORS APPROVED BY Jim White, Mayor POLICY: Equal employment opportunity requirements for the City of Kent will conform to federal and state laws. All contractors, subcontractors, consultants and suppliers of the City must guarantee equal employment opportunity within their organization and, if holding Agreements with the City amounting to $10,000 or more within any given year, must take the following affirmative steps: 1. Provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer. 2. Actively consider for promotion and advancement available minorities and women. Any contractor, subcontractor, consultant or supplier who willfully disregards the City’s nondiscrimination and equal opportunity requirements shall be considered in breach of contract and subject to suspension or termination for all or part of the Agreement. Contract Compliance Officers will be appointed by the Directors of Planning, Parks, and Public Works Departments to assume the following duties for their respective departments. 1. Ensuring that contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and suppliers subject to these regulations are familiar with the regulations and the City’s equal employment opportunity policy. 2. Monitoring to assure adherence to federal, state and local laws, policies and guidelines. 25 EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 3 CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMPLIANCE STATEMENT This form shall be filled out AFTER COMPLETION of this project by the Contractor awarded the Agreement. I, the undersigned, a duly represented agent of Company, hereby acknowledge and declare that the before-mentioned company was the prime contractor for the Agreement known as that was entered into on the (date) , between the firm I represent and the City of Kent. I declare that I complied fully with all of the requirements and obligations as outlined in the City of Kent Administrative Policy 1.2 and the Declaration City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Policy that was part of the before-mentioned Agreement. Dated this day of , 200___. By:___________________________________________ For: __________________________________________ Title: _________________________________________ Date: _________________________________________ 26 Exhibit A Work Program Van Ness Feldman (Firm) agrees to provide federal representation to the City of Kent (City), beginning on April 1, 2008 to December 31st, 2008. Van Ness Feldman will provide the City with comprehensive federal representation and will work with the Mayor, City Council and City departments to develop and implement both a short term and long range federal relations strategy in support of City projects, policies, and programs that are influenced or supported by federal policies and funding. In Toward this end, Van Ness Feldman will implement the following work plan on behalf of the City of Kent: • Work with the City’s federal relations manager, city departments, mayor, and city council on developing and implementing a strategy to secure federal funding and policy support for the following key federal relations priorities in 2008 and beyond: 1. Funding from next year’s reauthorization of the Federal Transportation Reauthorization Bill and through the yearly discretionary appropriations bills for key grade separations and other significant transportation project priorities for Kent. 2. Funding and policy support for replacing the Green River levee system in Kent, adoption of a reasonable interim flood zone and flood insurance program until the levee system is replaced, repaired and recertified, and support for recertification of the levee system by the federal government once repairs and replacement have been completed. 3. Continued federal funding and regulatory policy support for the Green/Duwamish Rivers Ecosystem Restoration projects and program. 4. Continued federal support for local law enforcement and crime prevention. 5. Restoring Human Service and Community Development block grant funding in support of growing human service needs in the Kent community. 6. Identify federal policies, regulatory programs and grants that can support the City of Kent’s strategic goals. 7. Other federal opportunities and issues as they arise. • Coordinate and advocate for the City of Kent’s appropriations requests to the Washington Congressional delegation on behalf of transportation, habitat restoration, levee repair, and other municipal priorities identified by the City. 27 • Manage relationships with key staff in the Washington congressional delegation. • Coordinate with the City of Kent visits to Washington, D.C. by City officials working on Kent’s priority projects and other municipal interests. • Design and implement an outreach plan to bring Members of Congress and congressional staff to the City of Kent for further discussion and education on the needs and opportunities for federal support of the Kent communities’ priorities. • Monitor legislative initiatives of interest to the City of Kent. • Assist City Departments with tracking, identifying, and securing grant opportunities in support of City priorities and initiatives, including human services, open space, law enforcement, environmental and energy conservation, and others. • Provide updates, strategy development and coordination via monthly conference calls with the City of Kent staff on the progress of the work, next steps, and assignment of tasks between the lobbyist and City staff in support of the ongoing work program. These monthly calls will be supplemented by meetings and e-mail reports as needed. Ben McMakin for VanNess Feldman and Ben Wolters for the City of Kent will develop the agenda for these monthly calls in consultation with the leads of the City departments involved with the federal issues to be discussed and who will participate in those calls and meetings. Funding for Public Works’ grade separation and levee replacement projects will be leading issues for the monthly calls. Ben McMakin will have primary responsibility for this representation. If necessary, he may request assistance from other professionals in the firm to provide the City with the most effective, efficient, and timely representation. Rick Agnew will provide additional support for Kent from the Firm’s Seattle office. The City of Kent will pay the Firm a monthly retainer of $7,500. The retainer includes all associated costs, such as travel, printing, phone, etc, including all costs for one in person visit to Kent requiring air travel by up to two members of the Van Ness Feldman team. Additional air travel requested and required by Kent will be supplemental to the retainer and charged, without markup, as incurred. Van Ness Feldman understands that cities often work with significant budget constraints for this type of work and will work with the City on a work schedule that fits within the City’s budget parameters and still accomplishes the work needed. Van Ness Feldman will include in its billing statements all charges and disbursements for expenses incurred specifically for its representation of the City of Kent. A detailed statement of amounts due for professional services and expenses will be provided to the City of Kent on a monthly basis and the City agrees to provide payment within thirty days of receipt. The City of Kent consents to being listed as a Firm client on firm promotional materials. This consent includes to permitting the firm to generally describe the matters on which we have or are representing you to the extent that those matters are public knowledge. 28 The City of Kent has the right to terminate this engagement by written notice at any time. It is further agreed that after the conclusion of this contract, Van Ness Feldman will offer to return the files to the City of Kent. If Van Ness Feldman does not receive instructions as to the disposition of these files within 60 days after said offer, it is agreed that Van Ness Feldman need not retain such files for more than three (3) years, after which it may destroy all such materials that do not have intrinsic value. The City of Kent further agrees that Van Ness Feldman may retain a copy of materials in such files, at its own expense. 29 EXHIBIT B INSURANCE & INDEMNITY REQUIREMENTS No Insurance is required for this Contract. 30 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ben Wolters Phone: 253-856-5703 Fax: 253-856-6700 Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, WA. 98032-5895 May 6, 2008 TO: Kent City Council Operations Committee FROM: Ben Wolters, Economic Development Director THROUGH: Staff SUBJECT: Heffron Transportation, Inc. Consultant Service Agreement MOTION: Recommend Council to authorize the Mayor to sign the Consultant Services Agreement with Heffron Transportation Inc., to provide consultant services, to the City of Kent for preparation of the traffic and parking management plans for the Kent Events Center project. Subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney. SUMMARY: The agreement with Heffron Transportation, Inc. is to assist the City with preparation of the traffic and parking management plans for the Kent Events Center project. The Kent Events Center is planned to be open in late 2008 or early 2009, and we will know that opening date by July 1st. Any parking or traffic management measures should probably be in place (or be ready to install) by November of next year. Community input is still required for some elements of the plan such as the North Park RPZ and traffic control measures along 5th Avenue. Heffron Transportation agreement will not exceed $24,000. Task 1 – Meet with North Park neighbors to discuss potential RPZ Task 2 – Work with City to implement RPZ. Task 3 – Review directional signage plan for Event Center. Task 4 – Define enforcement plan for Kent Station. Task 5 – Assist with preparing event traffic management personnel. Task 6 – Observe opening day traffic and parking and recommend improvements. If you have any questions prior to the meeting, please call Ben Wolters, 856-5703. EXHIBITS: Attached BUDGET IMPACT: Yes 31 This page intentionally left blank 32 CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT - 1 (Over $10,000) CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT between the City of Kent and Heffron Transportation, Inc. THIS AGREEMENT is made between the City of Kent, a Washington municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City"), and Heffron Transportation, Inc. organized under the laws of the State of Washington, located and doing business at 6544 NE 61st Street, Seattle, WA 98115, (206) 523-3939 (hereinafter the "Consultant"). I. DESCRIPTION OF WORK. Consultant shall perform the following services for the City in accordance with the following described plans and/or specifications: Provide consultant service to the City of Kent with preparation of the traffic and parking management plans for the Kent Events Center project, all in accordance with Consultant’s April 9, 2008 Proposal for Traffic and Parking Management Plan, a copy of which is attached as Attachment A. Consultant further represents that the services furnished under this Agreement will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices within the Puget Sound region in effect at the time those services are performed. II. TIME OF COMPLETION. The parties agree that work will begin on the tasks described in Section I above immediately upon the effective date of this Agreement. Upon the effective date of this Agreement, Consultant shall complete the work described in Section I by . March 31, 2009. III. COMPENSATION. A. The City shall pay the Consultant, based on time and materials, an amount not to exceed Twenty-six thousand dollars (26,000) for the services described in this Agreement. This is the maximum amount to be paid under this Agreement for the work described in Section I above, and shall not be exceeded without the prior written authorization of the City in the form of a negotiated and executed amendment to this agreement. The Consultant agrees that the hourly or flat rate charged by it for its services contracted for herein shall remain locked at the negotiated rate(s) for a period of one (1) year from the effective date of this Agreement. The Consultant's billing rates shall be as delineated in attached Attachment B. 33 S:\PUBLIC\CLERK\City Council Committee Packets\Operations\_050608\ED_HeffronSvcAgreement.doc - 2 B. The Consultant shall submit monthly payment invoices to the City for work performed, and a final bill upon completion of all services described in this Agreement. The City shall provide payment within forty-five (45) days of receipt of an invoice. If the City objects to all or any portion of an invoice, it shall notify the Consultant and reserves the option to only pay that portion of the invoice not in dispute. In that event, the parties will immediately make every effort to settle the disputed portion. IV. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The parties intend that an Independent Contractor-Employer Relationship will be created by this Agreement and that the Consultant has the ability to control and direct the performance and details of its work, the City being interested only in the results obtained under this Agreement. V. TERMINATION. Either party may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, upon providing the other party thirty (30) days written notice at its address set forth on the signature block of this Agreement. After termination, the City may take possession of all records and data within the Consultant’s possession pertaining to this project, which may be used by the City without restriction. If the City’s use of Consultant’s records or data is not related to this project, it shall be without liability or legal exposure to the Consultant. VI. DISCRIMINATION. In the hiring of employees for the performance of work under this Agreement or any subcontract, the Consultant, its subcontractors, or any person acting on behalf of the Consultant or subcontractor shall not, by reason of race, religion, color, sex, age, sexual orientation, national origin, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability, discriminate against any person who is qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates. Consultant shall execute the attached City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Policy Declaration, Comply with City Administrative Policy 1.2, and upon completion of the contract work, file the attached Compliance Statement. VII. INDEMNIFICATION. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the Consultant's performance of this Agreement, except for that portion of the injuries and damages caused by the City's negligence. The City's inspection or acceptance of any of Consultant's work when completed shall not be grounds to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers, the Consultant's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence. IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE INDEMNIFICATION PROVIDED HEREIN CONSTITUTES THE CONSULTANT'S WAIVER OF IMMUNITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE, TITLE 51 RCW, SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS INDEMNIFICATION. THE PARTIES FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED THIS WAIVER. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 34 S:\PUBLIC\CLERK\City Council Committee Packets\Operations\_050608\ED_HeffronSvcAgreement.doc - 3 VIII. INSURANCE. The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance of the types and in the amounts described in Attachment B attached and incorporated by this reference. IX. EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION. The City will provide its best efforts to provide reasonable accuracy of any information supplied by it to Consultant for the purpose of completion of the work under this Agreement. X. OWNERSHIP AND USE OF RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS. Original documents, drawings, designs, reports, or any other records developed or created under this Agreement shall belong to and become the property of the City. All records submitted by the City to the Consultant will be safeguarded by the Consultant. Consultant shall make such data, documents, and files available to the City upon the City’s request. The City’s use or reuse of any of the documents, data and files created by Consultant for this project by anyone other than Consultant on any other project shall be without liability or legal exposure to Consultant. XI. CITY'S RIGHT OF INSPECTION. Even though Consultant is an independent contractor with the authority to control and direct the performance and details of the work authorized under this Agreement, the work must meet the approval of the City and shall be subject to the City's general right of inspection to secure satisfactory completion. XII. WORK PERFORMED AT CONSULTANT'S RISK. Consultant shall take all necessary precautions and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and subcontractors in the performance of the contract work and shall utilize all protection necessary for that purpose. All work shall be done at Consultant's own risk, and Consultant shall be responsible for any loss of or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in connection with the work. XIII. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. A. Recyclable Materials. Pursuant to Chapter 3.80 of the Kent City Code, the City requires its contractors and consultants to use recycled and recyclable products whenever practicable. A price preference may be available for any designated recycled product. B. Non-Waiver of Breach. The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, or to exercise any option conferred by this Agreement in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of those covenants, agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect. C. Resolution of Disputes and Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. If the parties are unable to settle any dispute, difference or claim arising from the parties’ performance of this Agreement, the exclusive means of resolving that dispute, difference or claim, shall only be by filing suit exclusively under the venue, rules and jurisdiction of the King County Superior Court, King County, Washington, unless the parties agree in writing to an alternative dispute resolution process. In any claim or lawsuit for damages arising from the parties' performance of this Agreement, each party shall pay all its legal costs and attorney's fees incurred in defending or bringing such claim or lawsuit, including all appeals, in addition to any other recovery or award provided by law; provided, however, nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit the City's right to indemnification under Section VII of this Agreement. 35 S:\PUBLIC\CLERK\City Council Committee Packets\Operations\_050608\ED_HeffronSvcAgreement.doc - 4 D. Written Notice. All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the parties at the addresses listed on the signature page of the Agreement, unless notified to the contrary. Any written notice hereunder shall become effective three (3) business days after the date of mailing by registered or certified mail, and shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing. E. Assignment. Any assignment of this Agreement by either party without the written consent of the non-assigning party shall be void. If the non-assigning party gives its consent to any assignment, the terms of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and no further assignment shall be made without additional written consent. F. Modification. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the City and Consultant. G. Entire Agreement. The written provisions and terms of this Agreement, together with any Exhibits attached hereto, shall supersede all prior verbal statements of any officer or other representative of the City, and such statements shall not be effective or be construed as entering into or forming a part of or altering in any manner this Agreement. All of the above documents are hereby made a part of this Agreement. However, should any language in any of the Exhibits to this Agreement conflict with any language contained in this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. H. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant agrees to comply with all federal, state, and municipal laws, rules, and regulations that are now effective or in the future become applicable to Consultant's business, equipment, and personnel engaged in operations covered by this Agreement or accruing out of the performance of those operations. I. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, and all of which will together constitute this one Agreement. IN WITNESS, the parties below execute this Agreement, which shall become effective on the last date entered below. CONSULTANT: By: (signature) Print Name: Its (title) DATE: CITY OF KENT: By: (signature) Print Name: Suzette Cooke Its Mayor DATE: 36 S:\PUBLIC\CLERK\City Council Committee Packets\Operations\_050608\ED_HeffronSvcAgreement.doc - 5 NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: CONSULTANT: Marni C. Heffron, P.E., P.T.O.E 6544 NE 61st Street Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 523-3939(telephone) (206) 523-4949 (facsimile) NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: CITY OF KENT: Ben Wolters, Economic Development Director City of Kent 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 (253) 856-5703 (telephone) (253) 856-6700 (facsimile) APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kent Law Department 37 EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 1 DECLARATION CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY The City of Kent is committed to conform to Federal and State laws regarding equal opportunity. As such all contractors, subcontractors and suppliers who perform work with relation to this Agreement shall comply with the regulations of the City’s equal employment opportunity policies. The following questions specifically identify the requirements the City deems necessary for any contractor, subcontractor or supplier on this specific Agreement to adhere to. An affirmative response is required on all of the following questions for this Agreement to be valid and binding. If any contractor, subcontractor or supplier willfully misrepresents themselves with regard to the directives outlines, it will be considered a breach of contract and it will be at the City’s sole determination regarding suspension or termination for all or part of the Agreement; The questions are as follows: 1. I have read the attached City of Kent administrative policy number 1.2. 2. During the time of this Agreement I will not discriminate in employment on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, age, or the presence of all sensory, mental or physical disability. 3. During the time of this Agreement the prime contractor will provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer. 4. During the time of the Agreement I, the prime contractor, will actively consider hiring and promotion of women and minorities. 5. Before acceptance of this Agreement, an adherence statement will be signed by me, the Prime Contractor, that the Prime Contractor complied with the requirements as set forth above. By signing below, I agree to fulfill the five requirements referenced above. Dated this day of ____, 200__. By:___________________________________________ For: __________________________________________ Title: _________________________________________ Date: _________________________________________ 38 EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 2 CITY OF KENT ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY NUMBER: 1.2 EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 1998 SUBJECT: MINORITY AND WOMEN SUPERSEDES: April 1, 1996 CONTRACTORS APPROVED BY Jim White, Mayor POLICY: Equal employment opportunity requirements for the City of Kent will conform to federal and state laws. All contractors, subcontractors, consultants and suppliers of the City must guarantee equal employment opportunity within their organization and, if holding Agreements with the City amounting to $10,000 or more within any given year, must take the following affirmative steps: 1. Provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer. 2. Actively consider for promotion and advancement available minorities and women. Any contractor, subcontractor, consultant or supplier who willfully disregards the City’s nondiscrimination and equal opportunity requirements shall be considered in breach of contract and subject to suspension or termination for all or part of the Agreement. Contract Compliance Officers will be appointed by the Directors of Planning, Parks, and Public Works Departments to assume the following duties for their respective departments. 1. Ensuring that contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and suppliers subject to these regulations are familiar with the regulations and the City’s equal employment opportunity policy. 2. Monitoring to assure adherence to federal, state and local laws, policies and guidelines. 39 EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 3 CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMPLIANCE STATEMENT This form shall be filled out AFTER COMPLETION of this project by the Contractor awarded the Agreement. I, the undersigned, a duly represented agent of Company, hereby acknowledge and declare that the before-mentioned company was the prime contractor for the Agreement known as that was entered into on the (date) , between the firm I represent and the City of Kent. I declare that I complied fully with all of the requirements and obligations as outlined in the City of Kent Administrative Policy 1.2 and the Declaration City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Policy that was part of the before-mentioned Agreement. Dated this day of , 200___. By:___________________________________________ For: __________________________________________ Title: _________________________________________ Date: _________________________________________ 40 April 9, 2008 Ben Wolters Economic Development Director City of Kent 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent, WA 98032-5895 Subject: Kent Event Center Proposal for Transportation Planning Services Dear Ben, Heffron Transportation, Inc. is pleased to continue assisting the City of Kent with its Events Center project. This proposal is to assist the City with preparation of the traffic and parking management plans for the project. The Kent Events Center is planned to be open in late 2008 or early 2009, and we will know that opening date by July 1st. Any parking or traffic management measures should probably be in place (or be ready to install) by November of next year. Community input is still required for some elements of the plan such as the North Park RPZ and traffic control measures along 5th Avenue. Heffron Transportation would assist City staff with preparing the traffic and parking management plans. Attached are the scope of work and budget estimate that detail our proposed work plan. Overall, we estimate our budget for this work to be about $24,000. We expect that this work would extend beyond facility opening into Spring of 2009. Please call me at (206) 523-3939 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Heffron Transportation, Inc. Marni C. Heffron, P.E., P.T.O.E. President MCH/mch Attachment A – Scope of Work Attachment B – Budget Estimate 6544 NE 61st Street, Seattle, WA 98115 Phone: (206) 523-3939 Fax: (206) 523-4949 41 Attachment A KENT EVENT CENTER Proposal for Traffic and Parking Management Plan Assistance Scope of Work We have estimated the following work tasks based on our past work on this project. Heffron Transportation would work with City staff to perform the needed community outreach and to finalize details about the Event Traffic and Parking Management Plan. Task 1 – Meet with North Park neighbors to discuss potential RPZ. We will attend up to three meetings with the North Park neighborhood to discuss the potential residential parking zone (RPZ) for that neighborhood. If the neighborhood is interested in the program, we will work with them to develop the program implementation details (e.g., how vehicles would be permitted, number of permits per household, guest-permit process, and renewal terms). Task 2 – Work with City to implement RPZ. Based on the outcome of Task 1, we will work with City staff to determine how the program will be implemented. This could include working with City staff to draft ordinance language to establish the program and allow City police or parking enforcement officers to ticket offenders. Task 3 – Review directional signage plan for Event Center. We will work with City staff (or a design consultant) to review the signage plan directing motorists to the Event Center and remote parking lots. This would include reviewing the text and location of the signs. Task 4 – Define enforcement plan for Kent Station. If needed, we will meet with the owners and managers of Kent Station to determine how best to discourage event attendees from parking at Kent Station. This will also include meeting with City staff to discuss available options with which the City can assist. Task 5 – Assist with preparing event traffic management personnel. In the months leading up to the facility’s opening day, we will attend up to three meetings with City staff to discuss event traffic control. These meetings should include traffic and police staff who may be involved in directing (or overseeing) traffic control. This task would include joint (City and Heffron Transportation staff) preparation of traffic control maps for various levels of attendance that show the location of control personnel, turn prohibitions, barricades, and other features. Task 6 – Observe opening day traffic and parking and recommend improvements. We have budgeted to have up to two staff available in the field on opening day to observe operations and recommend improvements (perhaps in real time). Information from these observations and recommendations can be cycled back into the event management plan to improve overall operations for subsequent events. April 9, 2008 42 Attachment B KENT EVENT CENTER Proposal for Traffic and Parking Management Plan Assistance April 9, 2008 Budget Estimate The following table presents our estimated budget for the detailed scope of work presented in Attachment A above. We estimate the budget for this work to be about $24,000. All work for this project will be billed on a time-and-materials basis not to exceed the budget amount. If the project team identifies additional work tasks, we will work with you to adjust our scope and budget. Table 1. Budget Estimate for Kent Event Center Traffic and Parking Management Plans Hour Estimate Phase 1 – Task Principal Senior Engineer Trans. Engineer Cost Task 1 – Meet with North Park Neighbors 18 0 0 Task 2 – Develop RPZ implementation details 24 8 0 Task 3 – Review signage plans 12 0 0 Task 4 – Meet with Kent Station 12 0 0 Task 5 – Assist with Enforcement Plans 32 12 0 Task 6 – Observe operations and improve plans 20 10 10 Total Hours 118 30 10 Hourly Labor Rates (2008) $176 $116 $94 Labor Costs $20,768 $3480 $940 $25,188 Expenses: Travel and Parking $800 Total Costs $26,000 43 This page intentionally left blank 44 ATTACHMENT B INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENTS Insurance The Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, their agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. A. Minimum Scope of Insurance Contractor shall obtain insurance of the types described below: 1. Automobile Liability insurance covering all owned, non-owned, hired and leased vehicles. Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage. 2. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors, products-completed operations, personal injury and advertising injury, and liability assumed under an insured contract. The Commercial General Liability insurance shall be endorsed to provide the Aggregate Per Project Endorsement ISO form CG 25 03 11 85. There shall be no endorsement or modification of the Commercial General Liability insurance for liability arising from explosion, collapse or underground property damage. The City shall be named as an insured under the Contractor’s Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed for the City using ISO additional insured endorsement CG 20 10 11 85 or a substitute endorsement providing equivalent coverage. 3. Workers’ Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of the State of Washington. 4. Professional Liability insurance appropriate to the Consultant’s profession. B. Minimum Amounts of Insurance Contractor shall maintain the following insurance limits: 1. Automobile Liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident. 2. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than $1,000,000 each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate and a $1,000,000 products-completed operations aggregate limit. 45 ATTACHMENT B (Continued ) 3. Professional Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than $1,000,000 per claim and $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit. C. Other Insurance Provisions The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions for Automobile Liability and Commercial General Liability insurance: 1. The Contractor’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respect the City. Any Insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the Contractor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it. 2. The Contractor’s insurance shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be cancelled by either party, except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. 3. The City of Kent shall be named as an additional insured on all policies (except Professional Liability) as respects work performed by or on behalf of the contractor and a copy of the endorsement naming the City as additional insured shall be attached to the Certificate of Insurance. The City reserves the right to receive a certified copy of all required insurance policies. The Contractor’s Commercial General Liability insurance shall also contain a clause stating that coverage shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respects to the limits of the insurer’s liability. D. Acceptability of Insurers Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than A:VII. E. Verification of Coverage Contractor shall furnish the City with original certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the Contractor before commencement of the work. F. Subcontractors Contractor shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the same insurance requirements as stated herein for the Contractor. 46 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ben Wolters Phone: 253-856-5703 Fax: 253-856-6700 Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, WA. 98032-5895 May 6, 2007 TO: Kent City Council Operations Committee FROM: Ben Wolters, Economic Development Director THROUGH: Kurt Hanson, Economic Development Manager SUBJECT: PSE Natural Gas and Electrical Easement MOTION: I move to recommend that Council authorize the Mayor to grant Puget Sound Energy easements for electrical and natural gas facilities on the Events Center property, upon concurrence of the language therein by the City Attorney. SUMMARY: Puget Sound Energy requires easements for their facilities on the Events Center property, between the street and meters, in order to serve the Events Center with electrical power and natural gas. These facilities include underground conduits, vaults, above ground transformers, and a natural gas service line. The meters for these facilities are located at the back of the building and the electrical and gas services are in James Street right-of-way. Separate easements are required for electrical and gas lines. The City will provide PSE with Ten foot wide easements along the centerline of these facilities as described in the attached documents. EXHIBITS: Easement BUDGET IMPACT: NO 47 This page intentionally left blank 48 City of Kent / Events Center 105048727 / RW-065561 Page 1 of 4 RETURN ADDRESS: Puget Sound Energy, Inc. Attn: R/W Department (J. Mai) PO Box 90868 / EST-06W Bellevue, WA 98009 EASEMENT REFERENCE #: GRANTOR: CITY OF KENT GRANTEE: PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC. SHORT LEGAL: Portion of SW 13-22-04 ASSESSOR’S PROPERTY TAX PARCEL: 132204-9015 THE CITY OF KENT, a Washington municipal corporation, owns the following described real property situated in Kent, King County, Washington: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING EAST OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 33 FEET THEREOF FOR STREET PURPOSES CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF KENT UNDER DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR’S FILE NO. 5660747 AND LYING SOUTHEASTERLY OF THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR PSH NO. 5 BY DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 22, 1965 UNDER AUDITOR’S FILE NO. 5944140; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF KENT BY DEED RECORDED JUNE 20, 1969 UNDER AUDITOR’S FILE NO. 6527771; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY AND UTILITY PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 8, 2008 UNDER AUDITOR’S FILE NO. 2008020800371. For and in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable consideration in hand paid, CITY OF KENT (“Grantor" herein) hereby conveys and warrants to PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC., a Washington Corporation ("Grantee" herein), for the purposes hereinafter set forth, a nonexclusive perpetual easement over, under, along, across, and through the following described real property ("Property" herein) in King County, Washington: SEE EXHIBITS “A” (ELECTRICAL) AND “B” (NATURAL GAS) ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE INCORPORATED HEREIN. 1. Purpose. Grantee shall have the right to use the Exhibit A Easement Area to construct, operate, maintain, repair, replace, improve, remove, and enlarge one or more utility systems for purposes of transmission, distribution and sale of electricity. Grantee shall have the further right to use the Exhibit B Easement Area to construct, operate, maintain, repair, replace, improve, remove, and enlarge one or more utility systems for purposes of transmission, distribution and sale of natural gas. Such systems may include, but are not limited to: Underground facilities. Conduits, lines, cables, vaults, switches and transformers for electricity and natural gas; semi-buried or ground-mounted facilities and pads, manholes, meters, fixtures, attachments and any and all other facilities or appurtenances necessary or convenient to any or all of the foregoing. 49 City of Kent / Events Center 105048727 / RW-065561 Page 2 of 5 Following the initial construction of all or a portion of its systems, Grantee may, from time to time, construct such additional facilities as it may require for such systems. Grantee shall have the right of access to the Easement Area over and across the Property to enable Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder. Grantee shall compensate Grantor for any damage to the Property caused by the exercise of such right of access by Grantee. 2. Easement Area Clearing and Maintenance. Grantee shall have the right to cut, remove and dispose of any and all brush, trees or other vegetation in the Easement Area. Grantee shall also have the right to control, on a continuing basis and by any prudent and reasonable means, the establishment and growth of brush, trees or other vegetation in the Easement Area. 3. Grantor's Use of Easement Area. Grantor reserves the right to use the Easement Area for any purpose not inconsistent with the rights herein granted, provided, however, Grantor shall not construct or maintain any buildings, structures or other objects on the Easement Area and Grantor shall do no blasting within 300 feet of Grantee's facilities without Grantee's prior written consent. 4. Indemnity. Grantee agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Grantor from and against claims and liability incurred by Grantor as a result of Grantee’s negligence in the exercise of the rights herein granted to Grantee. Provided, however, nothing herein shall require Grantee to indemnify Grantor for that portion of any such liability attributable to the negligence of Grantor or the negligence of others unless such others are agents of or otherwise under the control of Grantee. 5. Abandonment. The rights herein granted shall continue until such time as Grantee ceases to use the Easement Area for a period of five (5) successive years, in which event, this easement shall terminate and all rights hereunder, and any improvements remaining in the Easement Area, shall revert to or otherwise become the property of Grantor; provided, however, that no abandonment shall be deemed to have occurred by reason of Grantee’s failure to initially install its systems on the Easement Area within any period of time from the date hereof. 6. Successors and Assigns. Grantee shall have the right to assign, apportion or otherwise transfer any or all of its rights, benefits, privileges and interests arising in and under this easement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the rights and obligations of the parties shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective successors and assigns. DATED this _________ day of _______________________________________, 2008. GRANTOR: CITY OF KENT BY: ITS: 50 City of Kent / Events Center 105048727 / RW-065561 Page 3 of 5 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) On this ____________ day of __________________________________, 2008, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared _______________________________________________________, to me known to be the persons who signed as _________________________________________, of CITY OF KENT, the municipal corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be ________ free and voluntary act and deed and the free and voluntary act and deed of said municipal corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned; and on oath stated that ________ was authorized to execute the said instrument on behalf of the municipal corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. ________________________________________ (Signature of Notary) ________________________________________ (Print or stamp name of Notary) NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at______________________ My Appointment Expires: ____________________ Notary seal, text and all notations must be inside 1” margins 51 City of Kent / Events Center 105048727 / RW-065561 Page 4 of 5 Exhibit A Puget Sound Energy Electrical Easement A strip of land, 20.00 feet in width, in the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 13, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, said strip of land having 10.00 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Commencing at the south quarter corner of said Section 13; thence N88°25’06”W, along the south line of said southwest quarter, 468.71 feet; thence N01°34’54”E 48.00 feet to the north margin of James Street and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described centerline; thence N34°46’56”E 10.82 feet; thence N00°59’44”E 526.69 feet to a point of tangency with a 30.00 foot radius circular curve to the right; thence northeasterly, along said curve, through a central angle of 90°10’15”, an arc distance of 47.21 feet to a point of tangency; thence S88°50’01”E 21.72 feet, more or less to the westerly limit of the Kent Events Center building and the terminus of the herein described centerline. The side lines of said strip shall be extended or shortened, as required, to meet at angle points, the north margin of James Street and the westerly limit of the building. 52 City of Kent / Events Center 105048727 / RW-065561 Page 5 of 5 Exhibit B Puget Sound Energy Gas Easement A strip of land, 20.00 feet in width, in the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 13, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, said strip of land having 10.00 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Commencing at the south quarter corner of said Section 13; thence N88°25’06”W, along the south line of said southwest quarter, 109.96 feet; thence N01°34’54”E 48.00 feet to the north margin of James Street and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described centerline; thence N12°06’31”W 171.06 feet; thence N00°53’38”E 422.81 feet; thence N39°19’43”W 31.86 feet; thence N89°14’20”W 233.46 feet; thence S00°00’00”E 61.53, more or less to the northerly limit of the Kent Events Center building and the terminus of the herein described centerline. The side lines of said strip shall be extended or shortened, as required, to meet at angle points, the north margin of James Street and the northerly limit of the building. 53 This page intentionally left blank 54 City of Kent, Washington Summary Financial Report As of March 31, 2008 55 City of Kent QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT Table of Contents Executive Summary and Graphic Analyses Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 General Fund Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 General Fund Expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Property Tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Sales Tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Utility Tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Building Permits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Plan Check Fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Recreation Fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Fines And Forfeitures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Water Operating Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Sewer & Drainage Operating Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 CURRENT BUDGET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST General Fund Analysis and Forecast . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Street Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Lodging Tax Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Youth / Teen Programs Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Capital Improvement Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Criminal Justice Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS PROFIT AND LOSS Equipment Rental & Fire Equipment Replacement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Central Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Information Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Unemployment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 Workers Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Health Insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Liability Insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 Property Insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 REVENUE AND EXPENSE SUMMARIES - System Reports General Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 Special Revenue Operating Funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 Debt Service Funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 Water Utility Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 Sewerage Utility Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 Golf Course Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 Internal Services - excluding Insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 Insurance Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 Street Capital Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 Parks Capital Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 Other Capital Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 Technology Capital Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 Facilities Capital Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 Water Capital Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 Sewerage Capital Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 56 April 29, 2008 City Of Kent March 2008 Quarterly Financial Summary General Fund Summary Bottom Line – Revenue estimates based on historical trends by line item are running about $2.8 million, or 3.4% below expectations. However, we project expenditures to be $3.9 million, or 4.7% under budget. First quarter estimates indicate an ending fund balance for the year of 9,037,860, or 11.4%. At this time, it appears that the weakening sales taxes, lower building permit and plan check fees, are slightly offset by increases in utility taxes, fines and forfeitures. We will continue monitoring our revenues closely and address issues as they arise. Revenues • Revenues overall are projected to end about $2,788,363 or 3.4% under the adjusted budget. • Based on historical patterns, Sales taxes appear to be trending toward ending the year about $1.0 million or 5% under budget. With the continuing increase in fuel prices, the amount consumers have to spend on taxable goods and services has decreased. With the construction season now in process, sales taxes generated by these large projects should help to somewhat offset the affects of high gasoline prices. • Utility taxes are projected to end the year about $153,284 or 1.0% above budget. The increase is primarily due to the electric, gas and telephone utilities. • Building Permits are currently about $80,502 or 19.5% under budget. Plan Check Fees are down about $372,835 or 43.2% year to date. Both of these are volatile revenues that may vary widely from one quarter to the next. Our hope is that they will pick up based on the progress of significant construction projects. • Recreation Fees are about $112,381 or 17.1% under budget at the end of March. • Fines & Forfeitures are about 6.9% or $25,196 above budget. This was due to a higher than normal amount received in January, while February and March appear to be trending closer to budget. Expenditures • Current projections based on individual line item expenditure trends indicate ending the year about $3.9 million, or 4.7% under budget. This may change as more staff are added as a result of Public Safety’s hire ahead program and new 2008 positions are filled. 57 Fund Balance • The ending fund balance projected for 2008 is about $9,037,860 or 11.4% of expenditures. Other Funds • The Medical Insurance Fund has continued to improve and expenditures are about $354,374 under budget. Our expenditures have been growing at a slower rate than the national trends for the last few years. We have accumulated a fund balance now that allowed us to go into the year without increasing our internal rates for health care costs. Costs are expected to continue to increase, however, and we will adjust rates in future years to be in alignment with them and to maintain a reasonably safe fund balance. The first quarter is far too early to predict with any certainty what the rest of the year will bring. We will continue to monitor things closely. 58 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 08 BUD 4,434,497 4,547,906 4,848,454 13,768,085 8,015,884 6,411,033 4,578,563 4,262,993 4,343,612 14,582,575 5,902,929 6,532,862 08 ACT 4,268,420 4,218,531 4,513,064 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +/-(166,077) (329,375) (335,390)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCT +/- -3.7% -7.2% -6.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 08 BUD 4,434,497 8,982,403 13,830,857 27,598,942 35,614,826 42,025,859 46,604,422 50,867,415 55,211,027 69,793,602 75,696,531 82,229,393 08 ACT 4,268,420 8,486,951 13,000,015 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +/-(166,077) (495,452) (830,842)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCT +/- -3.7% -5.5% -6.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% GENERAL FUND REVENUES 0 2,000,000 4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 14,000,000 16,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MONTHLY BUDGET VS ADJUSTED ACTUAL 08 BUD 08 ACT GENERAL FUND REVENUES 0 10,000,000 20,000,000 30,000,000 40,000,000 50,000,000 60,000,000 70,000,000 80,000,000 90,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC CUMULATIVE BUDGET VS ACTUAL 08 BUD 08 ACT 59 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 08 BUD 6,285,675 6,329,594 6,561,512 6,605,130 6,976,336 8,012,415 7,237,601 6,663,594 6,942,783 6,786,917 7,542,481 7,237,694 08 ACT 6,673,820 6,442,929 6,785,542 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +/-388,145 113,335 224,030 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCT +/- 6.2% 1.8% 3.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 08 BUD 6,285,675 12,615,269 19,176,781 25,781,911 32,758,247 40,770,662 48,008,263 54,671,857 61,614,640 68,401,557 75,944,038 83,181,732 08 ACT 6,673,820 13,116,749 19,902,291 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +/-388,145 501,480 725,510 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCT +/- 6.2% 4.0% 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 0 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 7,000,000 8,000,000 9,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MONTHLY BUDGET VS ADJUSTED ACTUAL 08 BUD 08 ACT GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 0 10,000,000 20,000,000 30,000,000 40,000,000 50,000,000 60,000,000 70,000,000 80,000,000 90,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC CUMULATIVE BUDGET VS ACTUAL 08 BUD 08 ACT 60 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 08 BUD 205 183,893 639,475 9,360,484 3,650,752 128,253 56,597 (18,122) 568,780 9,697,515 2,152,426 232,336 08 ACT 332 264,846 700,807 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +/-127 80,953 61,332 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCT +/- 62.0% 44.0% 9.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 08 BUD 205 184,098 823,573 10,184,057 13,834,809 13,963,062 14,019,659 14,001,537 14,570,317 24,267,832 26,420,258 26,652,594 08 ACT 332 265,178 965,985 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +/-127 81,080 142,412 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCT +/- 62.0% 44.0% 17.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% PROPERTY TAX (2,000,000) 0 2,000,000 4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MONTHLY BUDGET VS ACTUAL 08 BUD 08 ACT PROPERTY TAX 0 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000 20,000,000 25,000,000 30,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC CUMULATIVE BUDGET VS ACTUAL 08 BUD 08 ACT 61 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 08 BUD 1,519,786 1,999,460 1,492,483 1,430,324 1,897,396 1,711,984 1,666,114 2,011,618 1,460,724 1,472,213 1,632,648 1,771,574 08 ACT 1,382,719 1,922,167 1,359,295 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +/-(137,067) (77,293) (133,188)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCT +/- -9.0% -3.9% -8.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 08 BUD 1,519,786 3,519,246 5,011,729 6,442,053 8,339,449 10,051,433 11,717,547 13,729,165 15,189,889 16,662,102 18,294,750 20,066,324 08 ACT 1,382,719 3,304,886 4,664,181 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +/-(137,067) (214,360) (347,548)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCT +/- -9.0% -6.1% -6.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% SALES TAX 0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MONTHLY BUDGET VS ACTUAL 08 BUD 08 ACT SALES TAX 0 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000 20,000,000 25,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC CUMULATIVE BUDGET VS ACTUAL 08 BUD 08 ACT 62 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 08 BUD 1,611,532 1,292,822 1,274,403 1,483,779 1,131,560 1,077,185 1,356,270 1,085,700 1,115,954 1,285,353 1,156,068 1,298,692 08 ACT 1,529,690 1,221,947 1,255,360 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +/-(81,842) (70,875) (19,043)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCT +/- -5.1% -5.5% -1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 08 BUD 1,611,532 2,904,354 4,178,757 5,662,536 6,794,096 7,871,281 9,227,551 10,313,251 11,429,205 12,714,558 13,870,626 15,169,318 08 ACT 1,529,690 2,751,637 4,006,997 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +/-(81,842) (152,717) (171,760)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCT +/- -5.1% -5.3% -4.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% UTILITY TAX 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 1,800,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MONTHLY BUDGET VS ACTUAL 08 BUD 08 ACT UTILITY TAX 0 2,000,000 4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 14,000,000 16,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC CUMULATIVE BUDGET VS ACTUAL 08 BUD 08 ACT 63 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 2007 7,288,487 14,161,901 18,830,236 25,921,259 13,088,065 6,789,737 30,610,201 19,905,162 12,177,328 7,935,402 6,880,165 53,569,947 2008 9,552,477 7,243,450 7,464,190 +/-2,263,990 (6,918,451) (11,366,046) PCT +/-31.1% -48.9% -60.4% JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 2007 7,288,487 21,450,388 40,280,624 66,201,883 79,289,948 86,079,685 116,689,886 136,595,048 148,772,376 156,707,778 163,587,943 217,157,890 2008 9,552,477 16,795,927 24,260,117 +/-2,263,990 (4,654,461) (16,020,507) PCT +/-31.1% -21.7% -39.8% Building Permits 2008 vs 2007 Actual Year to Date Valuation 0 50,000,000 100,000,000 150,000,000 200,000,000 250,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 2007 2008 Building Permits 2008 vs 2007Actual Valuation by Month 0 10,000,000 20,000,000 30,000,000 40,000,000 50,000,000 60,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 2007 2008 64 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 08 BUD 118,649 132,359 162,535 165,137 159,827 157,109 175,738 159,968 167,969 127,505 101,579 197,934 08 ACT 80,970 110,198 141,873 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +/-(37,679) (22,161) (20,662)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCT +/- -31.8% -16.7% -12.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 08 BUD 118,649 251,008 413,543 578,680 738,507 895,616 1,071,354 1,231,322 1,399,291 1,526,796 1,628,375 1,826,309 08 ACT 80,970 191,168 333,041 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +/-(37,679) (59,840) (80,502)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCT +/- -31.8% -23.8% -19.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% BUILDING PERMITS 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MONTHLY BUDGET VS ACTUAL 08 BUD 08 ACT BUILDING PERMITS 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 1,800,000 2,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC CUMULATIVE BUDGET VS ACTUAL 08 BUD 08 ACT 65 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 08 BUD 160,131 417,105 285,090 365,073 267,671 591,834 341,797 395,875 289,103 309,802 199,431 264,381 08 ACT 180,389 145,413 163,689 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +/-20,258 (271,692) (121,401)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCT +/- 12.7% -65.1% -42.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 08 BUD 160,131 577,236 862,326 1,227,399 1,495,070 2,086,904 2,428,701 2,824,576 3,113,679 3,423,481 3,622,912 3,887,293 08 ACT 180,389 325,802 489,491 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +/-20,258 (251,434) (372,835)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCT +/- 12.7% -43.6% -43.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% PLAN CHECK FEES 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MONTHLY BUDGET VS ACTUAL 08 BUD 08 ACT PLAN CHECK FEES 0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,500,000 4,000,000 4,500,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC CUMULATIVE BUDGET VS ACTUAL 08 BUD 08 ACT 66 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 08 BUD 225,627 185,020 246,731 77,064 86,028 142,485 178,071 151,196 63,724 44,448 65,016 34,417 08 ACT 179,445 212,485 153,067 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +/-(46,182) 27,465 (93,664)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCT +/- -20.5% 14.8% -38.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 08 BUD 225,627 410,647 657,378 734,442 820,470 962,955 1,141,026 1,292,222 1,355,946 1,400,394 1,465,410 1,499,827 08 ACT 179,445 391,930 544,997 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +/-(46,182) (18,717) (112,381)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCT +/- -20.5% -4.6% -17.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% RECREATION FEES 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MONTHLY BUDGET VS ACTUAL 08 BUD 08 ACT RECREATION FEES 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC CUMULATIVE BUDGET VS ACTUAL 08 BUD 08 ACT 67 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 08 BUD 101,327 121,006 143,372 119,778 124,445 133,122 121,961 133,496 121,526 125,637 120,261 117,375 08 ACT 135,623 119,842 135,436 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +/-34,296 (1,164) (7,936)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCT +/- 33.8% -1.0% -5.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 08 BUD 101,327 222,333 365,705 485,483 609,928 743,050 865,011 998,507 1,120,033 1,245,670 1,365,931 1,483,306 08 ACT 135,623 255,465 390,901 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +/-34,296 33,132 25,196 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCT +/- 33.8% 14.9% 6.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% FINES & FORFEITURES 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MONTHLY BUDGET VS ACTUAL 08 BUD 08 ACT FINES & FORFEITURES 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC CUMULATIVE BUDGET VS ACTUAL 08 BUD 08 ACT 68 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 08 BUD 588,852 500,541 548,463 544,321 732,403 807,274 1,098,010 962,591 1,203,363 666,199 629,025 556,425 08 ACT 561,016 563,731 547,475 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +/-(27,836) 63,190 (988)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCT +/- -4.7% 12.6% -0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 08 BUD 588,852 1,089,393 1,637,856 2,182,177 2,914,580 3,721,854 4,819,864 5,782,455 6,985,818 7,652,017 8,281,042 8,837,467 08 ACT 561,016 1,124,747 1,672,222 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +/-(27,836) 35,354 34,366 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCT +/- -4.7% 3.2% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% WATER OPERATING REVENUES 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MONTHLY BUDGET VS ACTUAL 08 BUD 08 ACT WATER OPERATING REVENUES 0 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 7,000,000 8,000,000 9,000,000 10,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC CUMULATIVE BUDGET VS ACTUAL 08 BUD 08 ACT 69 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 08 BUD 1,638,402 1,340,588 1,511,986 1,460,345 1,602,822 1,500,779 1,738,145 1,508,999 1,724,377 1,485,998 1,585,449 1,467,082 08 ACT 1,620,221 1,548,808 1,529,371 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +/-(18,181) 208,220 17,385 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCT +/- -1.1% 15.5% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 08 BUD 1,638,402 2,978,990 4,490,976 5,951,321 7,554,143 9,054,922 10,793,067 12,302,066 14,026,443 15,512,441 17,097,890 18,564,972 08 ACT 1,620,221 3,169,029 4,698,400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +/-(18,181) 190,039 207,424 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCT +/- -1.1% 6.4% 4.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% SEWER SERVICE CHARGES 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 1,800,000 2,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MONTHLY BUDGET VS ACTUAL 08 BUD 08 ACT SEWER SERVICE CHARGES 0 2,000,000 4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 14,000,000 16,000,000 18,000,000 20,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC CUMULATIVE BUDGET VS ACTUAL 08 BUD 08 ACT 70 2007 2008 2008 2008 Actual Budget YTD Est Actual Beginning Fund Balance 7,120,935 8,519,963 8,026,008 8,026,008 Revenues Taxes: Property 25,275,510 26,625,624 965,986 26,135,772 Sales Tax 18,589,242 20,066,326 4,664,181 19,066,326 Utility 13,926,905 15,169,319 4,006,997 15,322,603 Other 573,306 738,809 3,694 738,305 Licenses and permits 2,809,392 2,535,320 710,315 2,195,418 Intergovernmental revenue 6,672,478 7,740,775 647,667 7,811,561 Charges for services 5,049,138 5,869,876 1,175,837 4,359,014 Fines and forfeitures 1,373,235 1,483,307 359,209 1,487,986 Interest income 1,003,577 1,276,043 110,824 1,291,334 Fair Market Value Gain (Loss)(4,944) Miscellaneous revenue 1,128,152 723,999 323,614 1,032,717 Total Revenues 76,395,992 82,229,398 12,968,322 79,441,035 Transfers In 1,236,335 1,262,765 1,262,765 TOTAL RESOURCES 84,753,261 92,012,126 20,994,330 88,729,808 Operating Expenditures Salaries & Benefits 57,088,071 63,059,351 14,988,114 59,543,393 Supplies 3,052,887 3,520,773 730,856 3,082,491 Services & charges 21,019,412 22,559,064 5,429,323 22,559,064 Capital outlay 161,495 26,389 26,389 Cost allocation (4,917,893) (5,957,457) (1,272,389) (5,957,457) Total Operating Expenditures 76,403,972 83,181,731 19,902,291 79,253,880 Transfers Out 339,682 438,068 438,068 TOTAL EXPENDITURES & USES 76,743,654 83,619,799 19,902,291 79,691,948 Increase (Decrease)888,672 (127,636) (6,933,969) 1,011,852 Ending Fund Balance 10% Target for Contingency 7,606,429 8,318,173 7,925,388 7,925,388 Undesignated 403,178 74,154 (6,833,349) 1,112,473 Total Ending Balance 8,026,008 8,392,327 1,092,039 9,037,860 10.5% 10.1%11.4% Original Budget Ending Fund Balance 8,397,039 10.1% GENERAL FUND BUDGET ANALYSIS As of March 31, 2008 71 2007 2008 2008 2008 Actual Budget YTD Est FINANCIAL RESOURCES Beginning Fund Balance 1,663,094 876,305 493,587 493,587 Intergovernmental Revenue Fuel Tax - Unrestricted 2,064,112 2,111,445 472,151 1,998,210 Utility Taxes Water 82,756 73,463 16,469 77,572 Sewer 179,316 189,821 46,612 189,568 Drainage 86,589 92,935 25,491 89,726 Electric 968,958 1,069,006 291,322 1,067,115 Gas 401,177 531,921 143,999 531,921 Garbage 219,304 243,749 55,127 231,305 Telephone 747,334 829,623 202,970 809,934 Interest Income 86,558 133,739 3,137 133,739 Misc Revenues Total Revenues 4,836,104 5,275,702 1,257,278 5,129,090 TOTAL RESOURCES 6,499,199 6,152,007 1,750,865 5,622,677 EXPENDITURES & TRANSFERS Debt Service PW Trust Fund Loan 521,148 518,757 518,757 LTGO Bonds 1999 67,509 70,197 70,197 LTGO Bonds 2000 359,773 336,506 336,506 LTGO Bonds 2002 648,205 649,628 649,628 GO Refund (96) 2004 131,703 130,153 130,153 LTGO / Taxable Bonds 2003 14,739 42 GO Refund 2005 (93,95,00,96TF)37,683 37,875 37,875 Total Debt Service 1,780,760 1,743,116 42 1,743,116 Effective Transportation System Operating Costs Street Utility Operations 220,287 178,092 89,681 86,757 Street Tree Maintenance Program 218,706 232,768 56,428 281,056 Engineering Services Allocation 407,682 423,989 105,997 423,989 Total Operating Expenditures 846,674 834,849 252,106 791,802 Arterials 2nd Avenue (Smith-Meeker) 256th (Kent Kangley-116th) 104,179 Hwy 99 HOV Lanes - Phase 1 1,970,466 4th Avenue North Improvements 1,500,000 372,508 1,500,000 Total Arterials 2,074,645 1,500,000 372,508 1,500,000 CURRENT BUDGET ANALYSIS STREET FUND as of March 31, 2008 72 2007 2008 2008 2008 Actual Budget YTD Est CURRENT BUDGET ANALYSIS STREET FUND as of March 31, 2008 Intersection Improvements 124th Avenue Improvements 75,000 248th Street Improvements 75,000 Willis & Central Avenue 600,000 600,000 Total Intersection Improvements 150,000 600,000 600,000 Other Improvements Traffic Lighting & Safety Citywide Guardrail & Safety Improvements (120,030) Transportation Master Plan 425,000 450,000 450,000 Street Striping Program (92,467) 89,000 89,000 Transit Now Partnership Program 260,000 260,000 Neighborhood Traffic Control 75,000 75,000 Alternative Modes & Paths Sidewalk Rehabilitation (851,680) 500,000 500,000 Kent Shuttle Service 35,000 35,000 35,000 Bike Paths/ Canyon Drive Improvements (200,000) Misc Projects Asphalt Overlays/Slurry Seal Program 217,710 Pavement Rating Survey 15,000 15,000 15,000 East Hill M&O Facility Land (150,580) Downtown ITS Improvements 300,000 BNSF Grade Separation 1,425,000 East Hill Operations Center 150,580 Total Other Improvements 1,153,533 1,424,000 1,424,000 Total Effective Transportation System 4,224,852 4,358,849 624,614 4,315,802 TOTAL EXPENDITURES & TRANSFERS 6,005,612 6,101,965 624,655 6,058,918 Change In Fund Balance (1,169,508) (826,263) 632,623 (929,828) Ending Fund Balance Unrestricted 493,587 (332,676) 1,126,210 (436,241) Total Ending Fund Balance 493,587 50,042 1,126,210 (436,241) 73 2007 2008 2008 2008 Actual Budget YTD Est Actual BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 145,604 204,964 204,964 204,954 REVENUES Lodging Tax 195,667 185,000 37,746 181,221 Interest Income 8,148 5,500 1,883 5,500 TOTAL REVENUES 203,815 190,500 39,628 186,721 TOTAL RESOURCES 349,419 395,464 244,592 391,675 EXPENDITURES Strong Local Economy Tourism Marketing Softball 4,788 Tourism Chamber 15,000 19,000 19,000 Seattle Southside Visitor Services 100,000 120,000 120,000 Downtown Partnership Maps 5,000 2008 Sponsorship Seattle Convention Center 16,667 Tourism Unallocated 3,000 20,000 12,500 20,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES (TRANSFERS)144,455 159,000 12,500 159,000 Change in Fund Balance 59,360 31,500 27,128 27,721 ENDING FUND BALANCE 204,954 236,464 232,092 232,675 as of March 31, 2008 CURRENT BUDGET ANALYSIS LODGING TAX OPERATING FUND 74 2007 2008 2008 2008 Actual Budget YTD Est Actual BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 95,962 284,753 284,753 284,753 REVENUES Utility Taxes: Water 24,827 22,039 4,941 23,271 Sewer 53,795 56,946 13,983 56,870 Drainage 25,977 27,880 7,647 26,918 Electric 290,687 320,702 87,397 320,135 Gas 120,353 154,244 43,200 154,244 Garbage 65,791 73,125 16,538 69,392 Telephone 224,200 225,272 60,891 242,980 Interest Income 14,756 5,795 2,435 5,795 TOTAL REVENUES 820,386 886,003 237,032 899,605 TOTAL RESOURCES 916,348 1,170,756 521,785 1,184,358 EXPENDITURES Valued Government Services Transfer Out - General Fund Teen Programs 559,595 862,220 862,220 Transfer Out - Parks Capital Projects 5,000 50,000 50,000 Teen Golf Program 42,000 42,000 42,000 Transfer Out - GF Aquatics 25,000 25,000 25,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES (TRANSFERS)631,595 979,220 979,220 Change In Fund Balance 188,791 (93,217)237,032 (79,615) ENDING FUND BALANCE 284,753 191,536 521,785 205,138 CURRENT BUDGET ANALYSIS YOUTH/TEEN PROGRAMS OPERATING FUND As of March 31, 2008 75 2007 2008 2008 2008 Actual Adj Budget YTD Est Actual TOTAL BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 4,328,914 3,656,228 3,367,487 3,367,487 REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCIAL SOURCES Sales Tax 6,099,633 6,318,805 1,529,502 6,002,865 Sales Tax - Nonrecurring events Real Estate Excise Tax 2,306,407 2,283,012 555,514 2,252,534 Real Estate Excise Tax - 2nd Qtr Percent 2,306,373 2,283,230 555,514 2,252,643 Real Estate Excise Tax - State 339,600 71,775 71,775 Interest 266,427 276,230 31,396 276,230 Sale of Property TOTAL REVENUES/OTHER FINANCIAL SOURCES 11,318,440 11,161,277 2,743,701 10,856,047 TOTAL RESOURCES 15,647,354 14,817,505 6,111,188 14,223,534 EXPENDITURES (TRANSFERS) Debt Service SubledgerTitle Non-Voted Debt Service 135,275 85,000 73,735 85,000 LTGO Bonds 1999 290,417 286,175 286,175 LTGO Bonds 2000 1,741,937 1,579,428 1,579,428 Valley Communications 159,141 250,479 250,479 LTGO Bonds 2002 506,245 509,222 509,222 LTGO / Taxable Bonds 2003 988,735 666,164 0 666,164 GO Refund (96) 2004 1,398,036 1,381,578 1,381,578 GO Refund 2005 (93,95,00,96TF)62,932 63,254 63,254 LTGO Bonds 2006 518,000 718,000 718,000 Golf Debt Service 260,000 260,000 65,000 260,000 Subtotal Debt Service 6,060,718 5,799,300 138,735 5,799,300 Safe Community Fire - Replacement Radio Fund 400,000 400,000 Fire Equipment 400,000 600,000 75,000 600,000 Fire - Breathing Apparatus 120,000 150,000 150,000 Fire - Replacement Fire Hose 15,000 15,000 Fire - Exhaust Systems (2)55,000 62,000 62,000 Fire - Sleeping Quarters/Restrooms 200,000 200,000 Fire - Security Fences 57,000 62,000 62,000 Other Public Safety Projects (63) Police-Corrections-Camera Upgrade/Renovations (0) 30,000 30,000 Police - HQ Livescan 25,000 25,000 Subtotal Safe Community 631,936 1,544,000 75,000 1,544,000 Valued Government Services Contribution to LEOFF1 Retirement Medical 250,000 Citywide Aerial Flight / Annexation Study 4,986 Grant Matching - Land Acquisition 75,000 75,000 75,000 Park Development - REET Riverwalk/Riverview Park Development 900,000 454,000 454,000 West Fenwick Renovations 415,000 500,000 500,000 Park Lifecycle Repairs and Renovations 250,000 250,000 250,000 Lifecycle-Play Equipment 50,000 60,000 60,000 Lifecycle- Ballfields 25,000 25,000 3,451 25,000 Lifecycle-Irrigation 25,000 25,000 1,045 25,000 Aquatic Center Study 250,000 Adopt-a-Park 35,000 35,000 35,000 East Hill "X" Park / Skate Park 260,000 Wilson Playfields 200,000 200,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT OPERATING FUND CURRENT BUDGET ANALYSIS As of March 31, 2008 INCLUDING BOTH PORTIONS OF ESTATE EXCISE TAXES 76 2007 2008 2008 2008 Actual Adj Budget YTD Est Actual CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT OPERATING FUND CURRENT BUDGET ANALYSIS As of March 31, 2008 INCLUDING BOTH PORTIONS OF ESTATE EXCISE TAXES Aquatic Center Land Acquisition and Plan 1,000,000 220,329 1,000,000 Urban Forestry 5,000 5,000 5,000 Eagle Scout Projects 25,000 25,000 25,000 228th Corridor Park/Trailhead 50,000 10,000 10,000 Softball/Soccer Field Developm 20,000 Life Cycle - Infield Soil 40,000 25,000 25,000 Master Plans 25,000 25,000 25,000 Architect/Engineering 10,000 Uplands Playfield Parking/Stre 250,000 25,000 25,000 General Government Projects Senior Center Greenhouse Upgrades & Expansion 173,427 Replacement Furniture (Lifecycle)25,000 25,000 38 25,000 Senior Center Upgrades 40,000 40,000 City Hall Upgrades 25,000 25,000 Range Netting-(Golf)25,000 25,000 Sealcoat Parking Lots 110,000 110,000 Miscellaneous Facilities Projects 40,000 31,019 40,000 Comprehensive Plan EIS Update 75,000 ERP System Upgrade 500,000 500,000 Events Center Study 300,000 300,000 Neighborhood Study 75,000 75,000 75,000 Annexation Study 100,000 Department Equipment 150,000 121,500 54,056 121,500 IT Annex Furniture/CATV Furnit 15,000 Resource Center Security Upgra 25,000 CKCF Improvements (Study)75,000 Shoreline Master Program 10,000 10,000 10,000 Police Patrol Remodel 30,000 Expansion Police/Fire Training 30,000 Remodel Washington Ave Fire St 150,000 Patrol Audio/Video Recording E 75,000 Taser Unit 25,000 Patrol Less Than Lethal Equipm 25,000 Downtown Gateways, Phase 2 75,000 100,000 22,104 100,000 Kent Parks Foundation 25,000 25,000 25,000 HVAC Lifecycle Replacements 275,000 175,000 175,000 Centennial Garage Seismic 178,799 Technology Projects 520,000 450,000 450,000 Fire Station Grounds Renovation 50,000 50,000 Major Entries into Kent 50,000 50,000 Other Projects 500,001 275,000 1,461 275,000 Subtotal Valued Government Services 5,587,213 5,135,500 343,504 5,135,500 TOTAL EXPENDITURES (TRANSFERS)12,279,868 12,478,800 557,239 12,478,800 Change in Fund Balance (961,428) (1,317,523) 2,186,462 (1,622,753) TOTAL ENDING FUND BALANCE 3,367,487 2,338,705 5,553,949 1,744,734 77 2007 2008 2008 2008 Actual Budget YTD Est Actual BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 451,358 870,184 967,219 967,219 Revenues Sales Tax - Local Option (1)2,123,885 2,139,869 1 547,207 2,032,876 MVET - Basic & High Crime 253,449 224,702 68,254 213,089 MVET - Special Programs 66,746 75,934 16,850 72,110 Interest & Miscellaneous Revenues 23,473 3,865 6,860 6,860 Total Revenues 2,467,552 2,444,370 639,172 2,324,935 Transfers In 46,237 Total Resources 2,965,147 3,314,554 1,606,391 3,292,154 Expenditures Law Salaries & Benefits 356,465 491,935 93,499 375,374 Supplies 14,432 20,878 2,448 19,939 Services & Charges 8,997 47,715 1,994 8,445 Domestic Violence Salaries & Benefits 190,592 271,521 51,628 211,616 Supplies Services & Charges 5,808 7,749 1,573 5,390 Capital Outlay Project Lighthouse Services & Charges 25,195 25,195 25,195 Police Salaries & Benefits 1,291,274 1,665,628 340,610 1,428,881 Supplies 34,008 37,814 11,658 35,877 Services & Charges 60,457 73,270 16,704 68,744 Capital Outlay 49,438 170,000 170,000 Total Expenditures 2,036,667 2,811,705 520,114 2,349,461 Transfers Out (38,739) 270,149 8,340 270,149 Total Expenditures and Transfers 1,997,928 3,081,854 528,454 2,619,610 Increase (Decrease) In Fund Balance 515,861 (637,484) 110,718 (294,674) ENDING FUND BALANCE 967,219 232,700 1,077,937 672,544 1) Council resolution allocated 11% of Criminal Justice sales tax to Domestic Violence. CITY OF KENT CURRENT BUDGET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST CRIMINAL JUSTICE OPERATING FUND As of March 31, 2008 78 City of Kent 2007 2008 2008 2008 Description Actual Budget YTD Est Actual Beginning Working Capital 1,760,783 1,450,758 1,998,566 1,998,566 OPERATING REVENUE Fleet Operations 2,285,253 2,155,826 535,139 2,184,517 Fleet Replacement 1,311,057 1,439,655 360,441 1,372,676 Fire Equipment Replacement 458,000 577,080 144,270 577,080 Interest Income 127,339 125,062 27,345 125,062 Total Operating Revenue 4,181,649 4,297,623 1,067,195 4,259,335 Other Income Gain (Loss) On Sale Of Assets (33,509)10,418 10,418 Transfers In 400,000 300,000 75,000 300,000 Total Other Income 366,491 300,000 85,418 310,418 Total Resources 6,308,923 6,048,381 3,151,179 6,568,319 Operating Expense By Division Fleet Operations 3,465,699 4,762,782 712,246 4,848,249 Fire Equipment 82,088 219,340 1,020 225,018 Total Operating Expense 3,547,786 4,982,122 713,266 5,073,267 Operating Expense By Object Salaries 602,525 615,015 144,143 595,064 Benefits 201,152 242,610 50,961 209,949 Supplies 1,221,544 1,385,736 261,931 1,507,233 Services 653,849 808,511 139,570 830,771 Capital Outlay 868,716 1,930,250 116,661 1,930,250 Total Operating Expense 3,547,786 4,982,122 713,266 5,073,267 Other Financial Uses Transfers Out 762,572 645,727 645,727 645,727 Total Other Uses 762,572 645,727 645,727 645,727 Total Expenses and Uses 4,310,358 5,627,849 1,358,993 5,718,994 Net Change In Working Capital 237,782 (1,030,226) (206,380) (1,149,241) Total Working Capital 1,998,566 420,532 1,792,186 849,325 Equipment Rental and Fire Equipment Replacement As of March 31, 2008 79 2007 2008 2008 2008 Description Actual Budget YTD Est Actual Beginning Working Capital 54,921 10,699 23,730 23,730 REVENUE Central Stores 259,336 291,174 69,908 283,721 Postage 262,642 292,561 77,213 300,998 Photocopy 126,638 159,625 20,674 81,572 Total Revenue 648,615 743,360 167,796 666,291 Total Resources 703,536 754,059 191,526 690,021 EXPENSE Central Stores 268,459 280,740 52,048 280,740 Postage 256,290 293,972 81,261 314,437 Photocopy 155,057 98,790 24,998 114,190 Total Expense 679,806 673,502 158,308 709,367 Net Operating Income (31,191) 69,858 9,488 (43,076) Ending Working Capital 23,730 80,557 33,218 (19,346) Central Services As of March 31, 2008 80 2007 2008 2008 2008 Description Actual Budget YTD Est Actual Beginning Working Capital 103,705 329,859 25,283 25,283 REVENUE Contributions & Other 4,255,858 4,461,585 1,093,293 4,412,178 Total Revenue 4,255,858 4,461,585 1,093,293 4,412,178 Transfers In Total Resources 4,359,563 4,791,444 1,118,576 4,437,461 EXPENSE Data Processing Salaries & Benefits 1,593,814 1,865,401 430,180 1,725,093 Supplies 75,208 37,076 23,454 123,222 Services and charges 1,069,371 1,111,535 484,987 1,121,505 Equipment Sub-total 2,738,394 3,014,012 938,622 2,969,820 Telecommunications Salaries & Benefits 128,379 133,838 30,780 122,322 Supplies 81,777 18,575 (19,891) 18,575 Services and charges 360,933 407,639 71,619 414,585 Equipment 1,872 Sub-total 572,960 560,052 82,507 555,482 Printing/Graphics/Cable TV Salaries & Benefits 575,744 685,093 139,015 555,337 Supplies 80,399 97,605 13,906 95,032 Services and charges 166,783 219,947 36,994 156,140 Equipment Sub-total 822,926 1,002,645 189,915 806,509 Total Operating Expense 4,134,280 4,576,709 1,211,044 4,331,811 Transfers Out 200,000 Total Expenses & Transfers 4,334,280 4,576,709 1,211,044 4,331,811 Net Income (78,422) (115,124) (117,751) 80,367 Ending Working Capital 25,283 214,735 (92,468) 105,650 City of Kent Information Technology As of March 31, 2008 81 2007 2008 2008 2008 Description Actual Budget YTD Est Actual Beginning Working Capital (68,038) 55,693 (82,936) (82,936) Operating Revenue Rental Fees - Internal 4,449,616 4,778,024 1,196,439 4,785,756 Interest 22,286 29,269 6,249 29,269 Grants 2,389 0 0 0 Other revenue 41,811 73,109 9,060 47,747 Total revenue 4,516,102 4,880,402 1,211,749 4,862,772 Total Resources 4,448,064 4,936,095 1,128,813 4,779,836 Operating Expense Salaries and benefits 1,968,161 2,243,164 517,826 2,117,004 Supplies 360,038 337,662 72,457 403,650 Services and charges 4,313,442 4,646,585 994,446 4,322,796 Capital outlay 0 0 0 0 Cost allocation (2,569,083) (2,767,878) (615,358) (2,467,864) Total Operating Expense 4,072,559 4,459,533 969,371 4,375,586 Other Financial Uses Transfers-(out) - Projects 335,000 300,000 0 300,000 Transfers-(out)-Debt 117,903 152,903 0 152,903 Total Non Operating Rev (Exp)452,903 452,903 0 452,903 Total Expenses and Uses 4,525,462 4,912,436 969,371 4,828,489 Net Change In Working Capital (9,359) (32,034) 242,378 34,283 Working Capital, 12/31 (1)(82,936) 23,659 159,441 (48,653) (1) Operating fund 540 only reported City of Kent Facilities Fund As of March 31, 2008 82 2007 2008 2008 2008 Description Actual Budget YTD Est Act Beginning Working Capital 68,321 41,639 23,680 23,680 REVENUE Contributions 71,372 80,000 20,953 83,811 Interest Income 1,841 6,927 21 6,927 Total Revenue 73,213 86,927 20,973 90,738 Total Resources 141,534 128,566 44,653 114,418 EXPENSE Salaries and benefits 20,350 20,063 5,250 23,006 Supplies 3,751 3,751 Claims Paid 1st Quarter 29,468 33,506 16,283 18,237 2nd Quarter 16,936 20,000 24,489 3rd Quarter 28,878 20,000 28,101 4th Quarter 19,298 20,000 39,422 Personnel Costs Other services and charges 2,925 7,680 450 7,680 Transfer to Worker's Comp Capital Outlay Total Expenses 117,855 125,000 21,983 144,686 Net Income (44,642) (38,073) (1,010) (53,948) Ending Working Capital 23,680 3,566 22,670 (30,268) Unemployment As of March 31, 2008 83 2007 2008 2008 2008 Description Actual Budget YTD Est Actual Beginning Working Capital 187,001 274,726 (61,482) (61,482) REVENUE Contributions 1,398,871 1,406,651 295,956 1,254,050 Interest Income 73,898 110,062 10,928 110,062 Total Revenue 1,472,768 1,516,713 306,883 1,364,112 Transfers In Total Resources 1,659,769 1,791,439 245,402 1,302,630 EXPENSE Salaries and benefits 80,827 90,598 24,571 94,033 Judgements & Damages 865,432 883,050 177,918 883,050 Ultimate Loss Adjustment 331,271 Liability insurance 68,721 83,334 67,307 67,307 Intergovernmental services 181,078 204,750 39,024 209,000 Administrative costs 58,807 49,701 28,808 49,701 Debt and financial services 10,000 9,348 9,348 Other 90,492 14,685 15,596 15,927 Safety program 34,623 100,111 3,951 93,634 Total Expense 1,721,251 1,435,577 357,175 1,422,000 Net Income (248,482) 81,136 (50,292) (57,888) Ending Working Capital (61,482) 355,862 (111,773) (119,370) Workers Compensation As of March 31, 2008 84 2007 2008 2008 2008 Description Actual Budget YTD Est Actual Beginning Working Capital 6,268,067 6,549,270 6,792,937 6,792,937 REVENUE Contributions Blue Cross 7,537,457 9,970,846 2,341,040 9,364,161 Group Health 304,373 363,602 95,041 378,580 Employee Share Blue Cross 745,982 925,644 221,015 923,840 Group Health 9,082 43,521 43,521 COBRA 79,289 104,703 13,023 104,703 LEOFF1 Retirees (24) 121,418 121,418 Interest 401,945 311,315 70,378 311,315 Miscellaneous 156,043 119,106 28,193 28,193 Total Revenue 9,234,147 11,960,155 2,768,690 11,275,731 Total Resources 15,502,214 18,509,425 9,561,626 18,068,668 EXPENSE Salaries and benefits 218,475 232,788 55,748 235,685 Blue Cross Claims 7,119,497 9,194,872 1,962,074 8,093,566 Blue Cross Admin Fees 603,037 598,993 227,201 826,194 Blue Cross Audit Fees 640 54,835 54,835 Stop Loss Fees 400,407 442,683 72,797 442,683 Stop Loss Reimbursements (91,238) (392,934) Group Health Premiums 375,494 370,495 95,041 385,156 IBNR adjustment (133,700) 234,449 234,449 Wellness 30,396 38,231 6,065 34,357 Other Professional Services 186,268 61,810 38,971 177,923 Total Expense 8,709,276 10,836,222 2,457,897 10,484,848 Change in Working Capital 524,871 1,123,933 310,792 790,883 Ending Working Capital 6,792,937 7,673,203 7,103,729 7,583,820 IBNR- 2007 771,300 Target Fund Bal @ 2 X IBNR 1,542,600 Health and Employee Wellness Fund As of March 31, 2008 85 2007 2008 2008 2008 Description Actual Budget YTD Est Actual Beginning Working Capital 644,466 827,999 579,503 579,503 REVENUE Contributions 1,797,492 1,797,564 449,373 1,797,528 Interest 73,593 61,989 11,362 61,989 Total Revenue 1,871,085 1,859,553 460,735 1,859,517 EXPENSE Salaries and benefits 81,397 80,201 21,001 92,030 Claims & Judgements 797,525 702,799 58,473 702,799 Loss reserves adjustment Insurance Premiums 807,531 955,612 924,853 924,853 Other Expenses 249,594 116,072 41,145 227,297 Total Expense 1,936,048 1,854,684 1,045,472 1,946,979 Transfers Out Total Expenses & Transfers 1,936,048 1,854,684 1,045,472 1,946,979 Net Income (64,963)4,869 (584,737) (87,462) Ending Working Capital 579,503 832,868 (5,234) 492,041 Liability Insurance As of March 31, 2008 86 2007 2008 2008 2008 Description Actual Budget YTD Est Act Beginning Working Capital 42,833 67,515 82,865 82,865 REVENUE Contributions 287,808 302,212 75,550 303,294 Interest 448 310 170 310 Reimbursement-Loss/Damages Total Revenue 288,257 302,522 75,719 303,604 Total Resources 331,090 370,037 158,585 386,469 EXPENSE Brokerage Fees 14,000 17,136 17,136 Insurance Premiums 217,648 277,778 252,057 277,778 Property Claims/Deductibles (9,275) 23,269 Other costs 25,852 20,063 5,250 22,915 Total Expense 248,225 338,246 257,307 317,829 Net Income 40,032 (35,724)(181,588)(14,225) Working Capital 82,865 31,791 (98,723)68,640 Property Insurance As of March 31, 2008 87 R5 5 G A 0 5 7 Ci t y o f K e n t 4/ 1 0 / 2 0 0 8 1 3 : 1 5 : 4 1 1 Pa g e - Ge n e r a l F u n d Ex c l u d e s P r o j e c t s as o f M a r c h 3 1 , 2 0 0 8 Ye a r E n d Re m a i n i n g Un r e a l i z e d R e v e n u e / Mo n t h s Pr o j e c t i o n Ye a r E n d Pe r c e n t Ma r c h Un e x p e n d e d B u d g e t De s c r i p t i o n Bu d g e t Pr o j e c t i o n Re a l i z e d / S p e n t Ye a r t o D a t e Pr o j e c t i o n % o f B u d g e t __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Av a i l a b l e R e s o u r c e s 8, 0 2 6 , 0 0 8 8, 0 2 6 , 0 0 8 8, 0 2 6 , 0 0 8 Be g i n n i n g F u n d B a l a n c e (0 ) 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 8, 0 2 6 , 0 0 8 8, 0 2 6 , 0 0 8 (0 ) 8, 0 2 6 , 0 0 8 To t a l F u n d B a l a n c e 3. 6 3 % 10 0 . 0 0 % Pr o p e r t y T a x e s 26 , 6 2 5 , 6 2 4 7 0 0 , 8 0 7 9 6 5 , 9 8 6 2 5 , 6 5 9 , 6 3 8 25 , 6 5 9 , 6 3 8 2 6 , 6 2 5 , 6 2 4 23 . 2 4 % 92 . 9 8 % Sa l e s & U s e T a x e s 20 , 0 6 6 , 3 2 6 1 , 3 5 9 , 2 9 5 4 , 6 6 4 , 1 8 1 1 5 , 4 0 2 , 1 4 5 13 , 9 9 2 , 5 4 3 1 8 , 6 5 6 , 7 2 4 26 . 4 2 % 10 5 . 6 6 % Ut i l i t y T a x e s 15 , 1 6 9 , 3 1 9 1 , 2 5 5 , 3 6 0 4 , 0 0 6 , 9 9 7 1 1 , 1 6 2 , 3 2 2 12 , 0 2 0 , 9 9 1 1 6 , 0 2 7 , 9 8 8 .5 0 % 2. 0 0 % Ot h e r T a x e s 73 8 , 8 0 9 79 6 3, 6 9 4 73 5 , 1 1 5 11 , 0 8 1 14 , 7 7 5 28 . 0 2 % 11 2 . 0 7 % Li c e n s e s & P e r m i t s 2, 5 3 5 , 3 2 0 1 7 5 , 8 7 3 7 1 0 , 3 1 5 1 , 8 2 5 , 0 0 5 2, 1 3 0 , 9 4 4 2 , 8 4 1 , 2 5 9 8. 3 7 % 33 . 4 7 % In t e r g o v e r n m e n t a l 7, 7 4 0 , 7 7 5 4 0 8 , 2 9 9 6 4 7 , 6 6 7 7 , 0 9 3 , 1 0 8 1, 9 4 3 , 0 0 1 2 , 5 9 0 , 6 6 8 20 . 0 3 % 80 . 1 3 % Ch a r g e s f o r S e r v i c e s 5, 8 6 9 , 8 7 5 3 6 9 , 1 5 0 1 , 1 7 5 , 8 3 7 4 , 6 9 4 , 0 3 8 3, 5 2 7 , 5 1 1 4 , 7 0 3 , 3 4 8 24 . 2 2 % 96 . 8 7 % Fi n e s & F o r f e i t u r e s 1, 4 8 3 , 3 0 7 1 2 3 , 6 5 5 3 5 9 , 2 0 9 1 , 1 2 4 , 0 9 8 1, 0 7 7 , 6 2 7 1 , 4 3 6 , 8 3 6 21 . 4 8 % 85 . 9 2 % Mi s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s 2, 0 0 0 , 0 4 0 1 0 3 , 2 1 9 4 2 9 , 6 0 8 1 , 5 7 0 , 4 3 2 1, 2 8 8 , 8 2 4 1 , 7 1 8 , 4 3 2 Ot h e r F i n a n c i n g S o u r c e s 4, 8 2 9 4, 8 2 9 (4 , 8 2 9 ) 14 , 4 8 8 19 , 3 1 7 Op e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r s I n 1, 2 6 2 , 7 6 5 1, 2 6 2 , 7 6 5 To t a l R e v e n u e 83 , 4 9 2 , 1 6 0 4, 5 0 1 , 2 8 3 12 , 9 6 8 , 3 2 3 70 , 5 2 3 , 8 3 7 15 . 5 3 % 6 1 , 6 6 6 , 6 4 9 74 , 6 3 4 , 9 7 2 89 . 3 9 % To t a l A v a i l a b l e R e s o u r c e s 91 , 5 1 8 , 1 6 8 4 , 5 0 1 , 2 8 3 2 0 , 9 9 4 , 3 3 1 7 0 , 5 2 3 , 8 3 7 2 2 . 9 4 % 6 1 , 6 6 6 , 6 4 9 8 2 , 6 6 0 , 9 8 0 9 0 . 3 2 % Ex p e n d i t u r e s 28 6 , 1 7 7 23 , 3 0 9 63 , 3 0 3 22 2 , 8 7 4 18 9 , 9 1 0 2 5 3 , 2 1 4 Ci t y C o u n c i l 22 . 1 2 % 88 . 4 8 % 1, 7 3 3 , 5 6 9 1 0 2 , 9 9 3 4 4 4 , 5 3 3 1 , 2 8 9 , 0 3 6 1, 3 3 3 , 5 9 9 1 , 7 7 8 , 1 3 1 Ma y o r ' s O f f i c e 25 . 6 4 % 10 2 . 5 7 % 58 8 , 1 9 3 1 0 0 , 1 8 6 1 6 5 , 9 2 9 42 2 , 2 6 4 49 7 , 7 8 6 6 6 3 , 7 1 4 Ci t y C l e r k 28 . 2 1 % 11 2 . 8 4 % 1, 6 0 2 , 9 6 5 1 1 4 , 6 4 1 3 4 5 , 1 2 2 1 , 2 5 7 , 8 4 3 1, 0 3 5 , 3 6 7 1 , 3 8 0 , 4 8 9 Em p l o y e e S e r v i c e s 21 . 5 3 % 86 . 1 2 % 70 2 , 4 4 2 52 , 5 1 8 1 5 2 , 6 7 0 54 9 , 7 7 2 45 8 , 0 0 9 6 1 0 , 6 7 8 Le g a l 21 . 7 3 % 86 . 9 4 % 2, 0 9 4 , 7 1 4 1 4 3 , 3 2 6 4 4 4 , 3 5 7 1 , 6 5 0 , 3 5 7 1, 3 3 3 , 0 7 1 1 , 7 7 7 , 4 2 8 Fi n a n c e 21 . 2 1 % 84 . 8 5 % 99 , 6 4 0 6, 9 9 1 18 , 1 1 2 81 , 5 2 8 54 , 3 3 5 72 , 4 4 7 Ci v i l S e r v i c e C o m m i s s i o n 18 . 1 8 % 72 . 7 1 % 86 , 2 5 3 12 , 1 5 7 23 , 8 5 8 62 , 3 9 5 71 , 5 7 5 95 , 4 3 3 He a r i n g E x a m i n e r 27 . 6 6 % 11 0 . 6 4 % 7, 2 0 6 50 3 1, 3 3 0 5, 8 7 6 3, 9 8 9 5, 3 1 8 La n d U s e & P l a n n i n g B o a r d s 18 . 4 5 % 73 . 8 1 % 81 3 , 9 6 2 64 , 8 9 8 1 8 4 , 8 2 8 62 9 , 1 3 4 55 4 , 4 8 5 7 3 9 , 3 1 3 Pe r m i t C e n t e r 22 . 7 1 % 90 . 8 3 % 1, 4 7 7 , 8 7 0 1 2 1 , 6 2 9 3 5 4 , 7 2 8 1 , 1 2 3 , 1 4 2 1, 0 6 4 , 1 8 5 1 , 4 1 8 , 9 1 3 Pl a n n i n g S e r v i c e s 24 . 0 0 % 96 . 0 1 % 63 3 , 9 9 3 49 , 7 0 1 1 4 7 , 7 5 6 48 6 , 2 3 7 44 3 , 2 6 8 5 9 1 , 0 2 4 Co m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t A d m i n 23 . 3 1 % 93 . 2 2 % 10 , 1 2 6 , 9 8 4 79 2 , 8 5 2 2, 3 4 6 , 5 2 6 7, 7 8 0 , 4 5 8 7, 0 3 9 , 5 7 7 9, 3 8 6 , 1 0 3 Ge n e r a l G o v e r n m e n t To t a l 23 . 1 7 % 92 . 6 8 % 25 , 2 3 2 , 1 4 9 2 , 1 0 8 , 7 1 3 6 , 0 8 7 , 0 0 6 1 9 , 1 4 5 , 1 4 3 18 , 2 6 1 , 0 1 8 2 4 , 3 4 8 , 0 2 4 Po l i c e D e p a r t m e n t 24 . 1 2 % 96 . 5 0 % 24 , 2 3 7 , 2 2 9 2 , 0 2 4 , 8 5 5 5 , 8 2 7 , 4 5 9 1 8 , 4 0 9 , 7 7 0 17 , 4 8 2 , 3 7 7 2 3 , 3 0 9 , 8 3 6 Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t 24 . 0 4 % 96 . 1 7 % 14 8 , 3 6 0 11 , 9 5 2 35 , 3 0 8 11 3 , 0 5 2 10 5 , 9 2 3 1 4 1 , 2 3 1 Jo i n t T r a i n i n g C e n t e r 23 . 8 0 % 95 . 1 9 % 88 R5 5 G A 0 5 7 Ci t y o f K e n t 4/ 1 0 / 2 0 0 8 1 3 : 1 5 : 4 1 2 Pa g e - Ge n e r a l F u n d Ex c l u d e s P r o j e c t s as o f M a r c h 3 1 , 2 0 0 8 Ye a r E n d Re m a i n i n g Un r e a l i z e d R e v e n u e / Mo n t h s Pr o j e c t i o n Ye a r E n d Pe r c e n t Ma r c h Un e x p e n d e d B u d g e t De s c r i p t i o n Bu d g e t Pr o j e c t i o n Re a l i z e d / S p e n t Ye a r t o D a t e Pr o j e c t i o n % o f B u d g e t __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2, 2 3 2 , 5 9 5 1 9 7 , 9 7 2 5 5 9 , 3 9 8 1 , 6 7 3 , 1 9 7 1, 6 7 8 , 1 9 3 2 , 2 3 7 , 5 9 0 Mu n i c i p a l C o u r t 25 . 0 6 % 10 0 . 2 2 % 24 7 , 1 9 2 29 , 5 8 8 82 , 2 6 5 16 4 , 9 2 7 24 6 , 7 9 5 3 2 9 , 0 6 0 Le g a l P r o s e c u t o r s / D o m V i o l e n c e 33 . 2 8 % 13 3 . 1 2 % 1, 8 7 1 , 6 8 6 1 4 5 , 9 9 9 4 3 9 , 7 4 6 1 , 4 3 1 , 9 4 0 1, 3 1 9 , 2 3 7 1 , 7 5 8 , 9 8 3 Bu i l d i n g S e r v i c e s 23 . 4 9 % 93 . 9 8 % 53 , 9 6 9 , 2 1 1 4, 5 1 9 , 0 7 9 13 , 0 3 1 , 1 8 1 40 , 9 3 8 , 0 3 0 39 , 0 9 3 , 5 4 3 52 , 1 2 4 , 7 2 4 Pu b l i c S a f e t y To t a l 24 . 1 5 % 96 . 5 8 % 2, 6 7 7 , 8 5 6 2 6 3 , 9 9 2 7 4 8 , 0 2 6 1 , 9 2 9 , 8 3 0 2, 2 4 4 , 0 7 7 2 , 9 9 2 , 1 0 3 Pu b l i c W o r k s E n g i n e e r i n g 27 . 9 3 % 11 1 . 7 4 % 2, 5 4 8 , 8 5 1 1 9 7 , 7 8 2 6 2 3 , 7 8 5 1 , 9 2 5 , 0 6 6 1, 8 7 1 , 3 5 6 2 , 4 9 5 , 1 4 2 Pu b l i c W o r k s S t r e e t M t c 24 . 4 7 % 97 . 8 9 % 5, 2 2 6 , 7 0 7 46 1 , 7 7 4 1, 3 7 1 , 8 1 1 3, 8 5 4 , 8 9 6 4, 1 1 5 , 4 3 3 5, 4 8 7 , 2 4 5 Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n To t a l 26 . 2 5 % 10 4 . 9 8 % 89 3 , 0 2 0 58 , 8 4 5 1 6 9 , 1 7 1 72 3 , 8 4 9 50 7 , 5 1 2 6 7 6 , 6 8 2 Yo u t h & T e e n P r o g r a m s 18 . 9 4 % 75 . 7 7 % 9, 3 0 9 , 6 7 3 6 7 5 , 0 5 4 2 , 1 2 0 , 4 0 4 7 , 1 8 9 , 2 6 9 6, 3 6 1 , 2 1 3 8 , 4 8 1 , 6 1 8 Pa r k s , R e c r e a t i o n & C o m m S v c 22 . 7 8 % 91 . 1 1 % 10 , 2 0 2 , 6 9 3 73 3 , 8 9 9 2, 2 8 9 , 5 7 5 7, 9 1 3 , 1 1 8 6, 8 6 8 , 7 2 5 9, 1 5 8 , 3 0 0 Cu l t u r e & R e c r e a t i o n To t a l 22 . 4 4 % 89 . 7 6 % 1, 0 0 0 , 9 0 8 59 , 3 8 9 1 7 0 , 8 2 3 83 0 , 0 8 5 51 2 , 4 7 0 6 8 3 , 2 9 3 He a l t h & H u m a n S e r v i c e s 17 . 0 7 % 68 . 2 7 % 77 3 , 1 6 1 36 , 4 8 2 92 , 9 4 6 68 0 , 2 1 5 27 8 , 8 3 8 3 7 1 , 7 8 4 Hu m a n S e r v i c e A g e n c i e s 12 . 0 2 % 48 . 0 9 % 1, 2 9 0 , 8 1 1 1 4 1 , 5 1 3 4 8 1 , 7 8 2 80 9 , 0 2 9 1, 4 4 5 , 3 4 7 1 , 9 2 7 , 1 2 9 Pa r k s - S e n i o r C e n t e r 37 . 3 2 % 14 9 . 3 0 % 46 3 , 8 4 3 40 , 5 5 3 1 1 7 , 6 4 7 34 6 , 1 9 6 35 2 , 9 4 1 4 7 0 , 5 8 8 Pa r k s - S p e c i a l P o p u l a t i o n s 25 . 3 6 % 10 1 . 4 5 % 3, 5 2 8 , 7 2 3 27 7 , 9 3 7 86 3 , 1 9 8 2, 6 6 5 , 5 2 5 2, 5 8 9 , 5 9 5 3, 4 5 2 , 7 9 3 He a l t h & H u m a n S e r v i c e s To t a l 24 . 4 6 % 97 . 8 5 % 56 0 , 7 6 6 56 0 , 7 6 6 Ot h e r U s e s - T r a n s f e r s O u t 56 0 , 7 6 6 0 0 56 0 , 7 6 6 0 0 No n D e p a r t m e n t a l To t a l 83 , 6 1 5 , 0 8 4 6 , 7 8 5 , 5 4 2 1 9 , 9 0 2 , 2 9 1 6 3 , 7 1 2 , 7 9 3 59 , 7 0 6 , 8 7 4 7 9 , 6 0 9 , 1 6 5 To t a l E x p e n d i t u r e s % 23 . 8 0 % 95 . 2 1 7, 9 0 3 , 0 8 4 (2 , 2 8 4 , 2 5 9 ) 1, 0 9 2 , 0 4 0 6, 8 1 1 , 0 4 4 1, 9 5 9 , 7 7 5 3, 0 5 1 , 8 1 5 En d i n g B a l a n c e 89 R5 5 G A 0 5 7 Ci t y o f K e n t 4/ 1 0 / 2 0 0 8 1 3 : 1 5 : 4 9 1 Pa g e - Sp e c i a l R e v e n u e F u n d s Ex c l u d e s P r o j e c t s as o f M a r c h 3 1 , 2 0 0 8 Ye a r E n d Re m a i n i n g Un r e a l i z e d R e v e n u e / Mo n t h s Pr o j e c t i o n Ye a r E n d Pe r c e n t Ma r c h Un e x p e n d e d B u d g e t De s c r i p t i o n Bu d g e t Pr o j e c t i o n Re a l i z e d / S p e n t Ye a r t o D a t e Pr o j e c t i o n % o f B u d g e t __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Av a i l a b l e R e s o u r c e s 6, 3 8 3 , 6 6 1 6, 3 8 3 , 6 5 9 6, 3 8 3 , 6 5 9 Be g i n n i n g F u n d B a l a n c e 2 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 6, 3 8 3 , 6 6 1 6, 3 8 3 , 6 5 9 2 6, 3 8 3 , 6 5 9 To t a l F u n d B a l a n c e 24 . 4 6 % 97 . 8 5 % Sa l e s & U s e T a x e s 8, 6 4 3 , 6 7 4 6 2 0 , 3 1 5 2 , 1 1 4 , 4 5 5 6 , 5 2 9 , 2 1 9 6, 3 4 3 , 3 6 5 8 , 4 5 7 , 8 2 0 25 . 9 9 % 10 3 . 9 8 % Ut i l i t y T a x e s 3, 9 1 0 , 7 2 6 3 3 8 , 3 7 6 1 , 0 1 6 , 5 8 7 2 , 8 9 4 , 1 3 9 3, 0 4 9 , 7 6 2 4 , 0 6 6 , 3 4 9 25 . 9 0 % 10 3 . 6 1 % Ot h e r T a x e s 4, 5 6 6 , 2 4 2 2 0 4 , 5 5 2 1 , 1 8 2 , 8 0 3 3 , 3 8 3 , 4 3 9 3, 5 4 8 , 4 1 0 4 , 7 3 1 , 2 1 4 22 . 7 9 % 91 . 1 5 % In t e r g o v e r n m e n t a l 2, 6 0 5 , 6 7 4 1 5 8 , 6 0 9 5 9 3 , 7 7 0 2 , 0 1 1 , 9 0 4 1, 7 8 1 , 3 0 9 2 , 3 7 5 , 0 7 9 16 . 4 0 % 65 . 6 2 % Fi n e s & F o r f e i t u r e s 51 , 8 3 1 6, 2 7 4 8, 5 0 2 43 , 3 2 9 25 , 5 0 7 34 , 0 0 9 37 . 7 1 % 15 0 . 8 4 % Mi s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s 54 2 , 7 3 5 70 , 8 2 4 2 0 4 , 6 6 3 33 8 , 0 7 2 61 3 , 9 8 8 8 1 8 , 6 5 1 Op e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r s I n 43 9 , 0 6 8 43 9 , 0 6 8 To t a l R e v e n u e 20 , 7 5 9 , 9 5 0 1, 3 9 8 , 9 4 9 5, 1 2 0 , 7 8 0 15 , 6 3 9 , 1 7 0 24 . 6 7 % 1 5 , 3 6 2 , 3 4 1 20 , 4 8 3 , 1 2 2 98 . 6 7 % To t a l A v a i l a b l e R e s o u r c e s 27 , 1 4 3 , 6 1 1 1 , 3 9 8 , 9 4 9 1 1 , 5 0 4 , 4 3 9 1 5 , 6 3 9 , 1 7 2 4 2 . 3 8 % 1 5 , 3 6 2 , 3 4 1 2 6 , 8 6 6 , 7 8 1 9 8 . 9 8 % Ex p e n d i t u r e s 15 9 , 0 0 0 2, 5 0 0 12 , 5 0 0 14 6 , 5 0 0 37 , 5 0 0 50 , 0 0 0 Ot h e r S o u r c e s 7. 8 6 % 31 . 4 5 % 15 9 , 0 0 0 2, 5 0 0 12 , 5 0 0 14 6 , 5 0 0 37 , 5 0 0 50 , 0 0 0 Ge n e r a l G o v e r n m e n t To t a l 7. 8 6 % 31 . 4 5 % 14 1 , 7 1 9 3 6 4 , 3 4 6 (3 6 4 , 3 4 6 ) 1, 0 9 3 , 0 3 9 1 , 4 5 7 , 3 8 5 . 2, 6 6 4 , 5 7 1 1 5 5 , 8 7 9 4 5 0 , 4 5 6 2 , 2 1 4 , 1 1 5 1, 3 5 1 , 3 6 8 1 , 8 0 1 , 8 2 4 Po l i c e D e p a r t m e n t 16 . 9 1 % 67 . 6 2 % 50 , 5 4 5 50 , 5 4 5 Mu n i c i p a l C o u r t 83 9 , 7 9 8 49 , 1 2 6 1 5 1 , 1 4 1 68 8 , 6 5 7 45 3 , 4 2 4 6 0 4 , 5 6 6 Le g a l P r o s e c u t o r s / D o m V i o l e n c e 18 . 0 0 % 71 . 9 9 % 93 , 1 0 2 3, 7 1 1 11 , 1 3 4 81 , 9 6 8 33 , 4 0 2 44 , 5 3 6 Bu i l d i n g S e r v i c e s 11 . 9 6 % 47 . 8 4 % 3, 6 4 8 , 0 1 6 35 0 , 4 3 6 97 7 , 0 7 8 2, 6 7 0 , 9 3 8 2, 9 3 1 , 2 3 3 3, 9 0 8 , 3 1 1 Pu b l i c S a f e t y To t a l 26 . 7 8 % 10 7 . 1 4 % 3, 7 0 2 , 0 9 2 4 0 6 , 0 3 7 4 6 2 , 1 8 9 3 , 2 3 9 , 9 0 3 1, 3 8 6 , 5 6 6 1 , 8 4 8 , 7 5 5 Pu b l i c W o r k s E n g i n e e r i n g 12 . 4 8 % 49 . 9 4 % 42 3 , 9 8 9 35 , 3 3 2 1 0 5 , 9 9 7 31 7 , 9 9 2 31 7 , 9 9 2 4 2 3 , 9 8 9 Pu b l i c W o r k s S t r e e t M t c 25 . 0 0 % 10 0 . 0 0 % 23 2 , 7 6 8 17 , 8 9 3 56 , 4 2 8 17 6 , 3 4 0 16 9 , 2 8 3 2 2 5 , 7 1 0 Pa r k s , R e c r e a t i o n & C o m m S v c 24 . 2 4 % 96 . 9 7 % 4, 3 5 8 , 8 4 9 45 9 , 2 6 2 62 4 , 6 1 4 3, 7 3 4 , 2 3 5 1, 8 7 3 , 8 4 1 2, 4 9 8 , 4 5 4 Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n To t a l 14 . 3 3 % 57 . 3 2 % 69 , 0 6 8 9, 4 8 6 59 , 5 8 2 28 , 4 5 7 37 , 9 4 3 Pa r k s , R e c r e a t i o n & C o m m S v c 13 . 7 3 % 54 . 9 4 % 97 9 , 2 2 0 97 9 , 2 2 0 Ot h e r U s e s - T r a n s f e r s O u t 1, 0 4 8 , 2 8 8 0 9, 4 8 6 1, 0 3 8 , 8 0 2 28 , 4 5 7 37 , 9 4 3 Cu l t u r e & R e c r e a t i o n To t a l .9 0 % 3. 6 2 % 25 , 1 9 5 25 , 1 9 5 He a l t h & H u m a n S e r v i c e s 25 , 1 9 5 0 0 25 , 1 9 5 0 0 He a l t h & H u m a n S e r v i c e s To t a l 10 3 , 7 6 8 8, 2 7 1 15 , 7 0 5 88 , 0 6 3 47 , 1 1 4 62 , 8 1 9 Pu b l i c W o r k s E n g i n e e r i n g 15 . 1 3 % 60 . 5 4 % 10 3 , 7 6 8 8, 2 7 1 15 , 7 0 5 88 , 0 6 3 47 , 1 1 4 62 , 8 1 9 Ut i l i t i e s To t a l 15 . 1 3 % 60 . 5 4 % 14 , 2 2 1 , 9 1 6 4 6 3 , 9 0 6 5 5 7 , 2 8 1 1 3 , 6 6 4 , 6 3 5 1, 6 7 1 , 8 4 3 2 , 2 2 9 , 1 2 4 Ot h e r U s e s - T r a n s f e r s O u t 3. 9 2 % 15 . 6 7 % 90 R5 5 G A 0 5 7 Ci t y o f K e n t 4/ 1 0 / 2 0 0 8 1 3 : 1 5 : 4 9 2 Pa g e - Sp e c i a l R e v e n u e F u n d s Ex c l u d e s P r o j e c t s as o f M a r c h 3 1 , 2 0 0 8 Ye a r E n d Re m a i n i n g Un r e a l i z e d R e v e n u e / Mo n t h s Pr o j e c t i o n Ye a r E n d Pe r c e n t Ma r c h Un e x p e n d e d B u d g e t De s c r i p t i o n Bu d g e t Pr o j e c t i o n Re a l i z e d / S p e n t Ye a r t o D a t e Pr o j e c t i o n % o f B u d g e t __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 14 , 2 2 1 , 9 1 6 46 3 , 9 0 6 55 7 , 2 8 1 13 , 6 6 4 , 6 3 5 1, 6 7 1 , 8 4 3 2, 2 2 9 , 1 2 4 No n D e p a r t m e n t a l To t a l 3. 9 2 % 15 . 6 7 % 23 , 5 6 5 , 0 3 2 1 , 2 8 4 , 3 7 5 2 , 1 9 6 , 6 6 3 2 1 , 3 6 8 , 3 6 9 6, 5 8 9 , 9 8 8 8 , 7 8 6 , 6 5 1 To t a l E x p e n d i t u r e s % 9. 3 2 % 37 . 2 9 3, 5 7 8 , 5 7 9 11 4 , 5 7 4 9, 3 0 7 , 7 7 6 (5 , 7 2 9 , 1 9 7 ) 8, 7 7 2 , 3 5 3 18 , 0 8 0 , 1 3 0 En d i n g B a l a n c e 91 R5 5 G A 0 5 7 Ci t y o f K e n t 4/ 1 0 / 2 0 0 8 1 3 : 1 5 : 5 9 1 Pa g e - De b t S e r v i c e F u n d s Ex c l u d e s P r o j e c t s as o f M a r c h 3 1 , 2 0 0 8 Ye a r E n d Re m a i n i n g Un r e a l i z e d R e v e n u e / Mo n t h s Pr o j e c t i o n Ye a r E n d Pe r c e n t Ma r c h Un e x p e n d e d B u d g e t De s c r i p t i o n Bu d g e t Pr o j e c t i o n Re a l i z e d / S p e n t Ye a r t o D a t e Pr o j e c t i o n % o f B u d g e t __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Av a i l a b l e R e s o u r c e s 2, 9 6 5 , 9 4 1 2, 9 6 5 , 9 4 3 2, 9 6 5 , 9 4 3 Be g i n n i n g F u n d B a l a n c e (2 ) 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2, 9 6 5 , 9 4 1 2, 9 6 5 , 9 4 3 (2 ) 2, 9 6 5 , 9 4 3 To t a l F u n d B a l a n c e 3. 6 8 % 10 0 . 0 0 % Pr o p e r t y T a x e s 60 0 , 0 0 0 16 , 2 2 9 22 , 1 0 1 57 7 , 8 9 9 57 7 , 8 9 9 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 30 . 4 7 % 12 1 . 8 9 % Mi s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s 4, 9 0 2 , 5 2 7 62 , 9 1 7 1 , 4 9 3 , 8 8 4 3 , 4 0 8 , 6 4 3 4, 4 8 1 , 6 5 3 5 , 9 7 5 , 5 3 8 1. 0 0 % 3. 9 9 % Op e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r s I n 7, 3 9 9 , 7 6 5 73 , 7 3 5 73 , 7 7 7 7 , 3 2 5 , 9 8 8 22 1 , 3 3 0 2 9 5 , 1 0 7 To t a l R e v e n u e 12 , 9 0 2 , 2 9 2 15 2 , 8 8 0 1, 5 8 9 , 7 6 2 11 , 3 1 2 , 5 3 0 12 . 3 2 % 5 , 2 8 0 , 8 8 3 6, 8 7 0 , 6 4 5 53 . 2 5 % To t a l A v a i l a b l e R e s o u r c e s 15 , 8 6 8 , 2 3 3 1 5 2 , 8 8 0 4 , 5 5 5 , 7 0 5 1 1 , 3 1 2 , 5 2 8 2 8 . 7 1 % 5 , 2 8 0 , 8 8 3 9 , 8 3 6 , 5 8 8 6 1 . 9 9 % Ex p e n d i t u r e s 12 , 9 0 8 , 3 4 7 73 , 7 3 5 2 3 0 , 2 8 6 1 2 , 6 7 8 , 0 6 1 69 0 , 8 5 9 9 2 1 , 1 4 5 Ot h e r U s e s - D e b t S e r v i c e 1. 7 8 % 7. 1 4 % 12 , 9 0 8 , 3 4 7 73 , 7 3 5 23 0 , 2 8 6 12 , 6 7 8 , 0 6 1 69 0 , 8 5 9 92 1 , 1 4 5 No n D e p a r t m e n t a l To t a l 1. 7 8 % 7. 1 4 % 12 , 9 0 8 , 3 4 7 73 , 7 3 5 2 3 0 , 2 8 6 1 2 , 6 7 8 , 0 6 1 69 0 , 8 5 9 9 2 1 , 1 4 5 To t a l E x p e n d i t u r e s % 1. 7 8 % 7. 1 4 2, 9 5 9 , 8 8 6 79 , 1 4 5 4, 3 2 5 , 4 1 9 (1 , 3 6 5 , 5 3 3 ) 4, 5 9 0 , 0 2 4 8, 9 1 5 , 4 4 3 En d i n g B a l a n c e 92 R5 5 G A 0 5 7 Ci t y o f K e n t 4/ 1 0 / 2 0 0 8 1 3 : 1 6 : 0 9 1 Pa g e - Wa t e r U t i l i t y F u n d Ex c l u d e s P r o j e c t s as o f M a r c h 3 1 , 2 0 0 8 Ye a r E n d Re m a i n i n g Un r e a l i z e d R e v e n u e / Mo n t h s Pr o j e c t i o n Ye a r E n d Pe r c e n t Ma r c h Un e x p e n d e d B u d g e t De s c r i p t i o n Bu d g e t Pr o j e c t i o n Re a l i z e d / S p e n t Ye a r t o D a t e Pr o j e c t i o n % o f B u d g e t __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Av a i l a b l e R e s o u r c e s 1, 9 6 8 , 3 4 0 1, 9 6 8 , 3 4 0 1, 9 6 8 , 3 4 0 Be g i n n i n g F u n d B a l a n c e (0 ) 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1, 9 6 8 , 3 4 0 1, 9 6 8 , 3 4 0 (0 ) 1, 9 6 8 , 3 4 0 To t a l F u n d B a l a n c e 18 . 9 2 % 75 . 6 9 % Ch a r g e s f o r S e r v i c e s 8, 8 3 7 , 4 6 8 5 4 7 , 4 7 5 1 , 6 7 2 , 2 2 2 7 , 1 6 5 , 2 4 6 5, 0 1 6 , 6 6 7 6 , 6 8 8 , 8 8 9 11 . 9 8 % 47 . 9 2 % Mi s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s 69 4 , 5 8 6 23 , 4 3 3 83 , 2 0 5 61 1 , 3 8 1 24 9 , 6 1 4 3 3 2 , 8 1 9 23 . 8 6 % 95 . 4 3 % No n R e v e n u e s 80 7 , 5 2 3 1 0 2 , 8 9 6 1 9 2 , 6 6 1 61 4 , 8 6 2 57 7 , 9 8 3 7 7 0 , 6 4 4 25 . 0 0 % 10 0 . 0 0 % Op e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r s I n 2, 2 1 7 , 1 8 6 1 8 4 , 7 6 6 5 5 4 , 2 9 7 1 , 6 6 2 , 8 9 0 1, 6 6 2 , 8 9 0 2 , 2 1 7 , 1 8 6 To t a l R e v e n u e 12 , 5 5 6 , 7 6 3 85 8 , 5 7 0 2, 5 0 2 , 3 8 5 10 , 0 5 4 , 3 7 8 19 . 9 3 % 7 , 5 0 7 , 1 5 4 10 , 0 0 9 , 5 3 8 79 . 7 1 % To t a l A v a i l a b l e R e s o u r c e s 14 , 5 2 5 , 1 0 3 8 5 8 , 5 7 0 4 , 4 7 0 , 7 2 5 1 0 , 0 5 4 , 3 7 8 3 0 . 7 8 % 7 , 5 0 7 , 1 5 4 1 1 , 9 7 7 , 8 7 8 8 2 . 4 6 % Ex p e n d i t u r e s 10 , 3 1 7 , 4 0 9 6 8 5 , 5 7 9 1 , 9 7 4 , 4 9 2 8 , 3 4 2 , 9 1 7 5, 9 2 3 , 4 7 6 7 , 8 9 7 , 9 6 7 Pu b l i c W o r k s W a t e r M t c 19 . 1 4 % 76 . 5 5 % 2, 2 1 7 , 1 8 4 85 , 9 3 2 2 5 7 , 7 9 6 1 , 9 5 9 , 3 8 8 77 3 , 3 8 8 1 , 0 3 1 , 1 8 4 Ot h e r U s e s - D e b t S e r v i c e 11 . 6 3 % 46 . 5 1 % 2, 2 6 3 , 1 8 5 1 8 4 , 7 6 6 5 5 4 , 2 9 7 1 , 7 0 8 , 8 8 9 1, 6 6 2 , 8 9 0 2 , 2 1 7 , 1 8 6 Ot h e r U s e s - T r a n s f e r s O u t 24 . 4 9 % 97 . 9 7 % 14 , 7 9 7 , 7 7 8 95 6 , 2 7 6 2, 7 8 6 , 5 8 4 12 , 0 1 1 , 1 9 4 8, 3 5 9 , 7 5 3 11 , 1 4 6 , 3 3 7 Ut i l i t i e s To t a l 18 . 8 3 % 75 . 3 2 % 14 , 7 9 7 , 7 7 8 9 5 6 , 2 7 6 2 , 7 8 6 , 5 8 4 1 2 , 0 1 1 , 1 9 4 8, 3 5 9 , 7 5 3 1 1 , 1 4 6 , 3 3 7 To t a l E x p e n d i t u r e s % 18 . 8 3 % 75 . 3 2 (2 7 2 , 6 7 5 ) (9 7 , 7 0 6 ) 1, 6 8 4 , 1 4 1 (1 , 9 5 6 , 8 1 6 ) (8 5 2 , 5 9 9 ) 83 1 , 5 4 1 En d i n g B a l a n c e 93 R5 5 G A 0 5 7 Ci t y o f K e n t 4/ 1 0 / 2 0 0 8 1 3 : 1 6 : 3 3 1 Pa g e - Se w e r a g e U t i l i t y F u n d Ex c l u d e s P r o j e c t s as o f M a r c h 3 1 , 2 0 0 8 Ye a r E n d Re m a i n i n g Un r e a l i z e d R e v e n u e / Mo n t h s Pr o j e c t i o n Ye a r E n d Pe r c e n t Ma r c h Un e x p e n d e d B u d g e t De s c r i p t i o n Bu d g e t Pr o j e c t i o n Re a l i z e d / S p e n t Ye a r t o D a t e Pr o j e c t i o n % o f B u d g e t __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Av a i l a b l e R e s o u r c e s 4, 2 2 9 , 4 7 5 4, 2 2 9 , 4 7 5 4, 2 2 9 , 4 7 5 Be g i n n i n g F u n d B a l a n c e 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 4, 2 2 9 , 4 7 5 4, 2 2 9 , 4 7 5 0 4, 2 2 9 , 4 7 5 To t a l F u n d B a l a n c e 11 . 8 9 % 47 . 5 7 % Li c e n s e s & P e r m i t s 13 2 , 4 3 4 4, 7 2 5 15 , 7 5 0 11 6 , 6 8 4 47 , 2 5 0 63 , 0 0 0 27 . 3 5 % 10 9 . 4 2 % Ch a r g e s f o r S e r v i c e s 26 , 4 4 3 , 3 8 8 2 , 2 3 6 , 9 9 7 7 , 2 3 3 , 3 4 5 1 9 , 2 1 0 , 0 4 3 21 , 7 0 0 , 0 3 6 2 8 , 9 3 3 , 3 8 1 28 . 9 4 % 11 5 . 7 6 % Mi s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s 34 1 , 1 5 4 29 , 8 6 8 98 , 7 2 9 24 2 , 4 2 5 29 6 , 1 8 8 3 9 4 , 9 1 7 6. 2 8 % 25 . 1 2 % No n R e v e n u e s 17 4 , 5 7 8 2, 3 5 4 10 , 9 6 5 16 3 , 6 1 3 32 , 8 9 5 43 , 8 6 0 25 . 0 0 % 10 0 . 0 0 % Op e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r s I n 1, 2 2 4 , 3 9 7 1 0 2 , 0 3 3 3 0 6 , 0 9 9 91 8 , 2 9 8 91 8 , 2 9 8 1 , 2 2 4 , 3 9 7 To t a l R e v e n u e 28 , 3 1 5 , 9 5 1 2, 3 7 5 , 9 7 7 7, 6 6 4 , 8 8 9 20 , 6 5 1 , 0 6 2 27 . 0 7 % 2 2 , 9 9 4 , 6 6 6 30 , 6 5 9 , 5 5 5 10 8 . 2 8 % To t a l A v a i l a b l e R e s o u r c e s 32 , 5 4 5 , 4 2 6 2 , 3 7 5 , 9 7 7 1 1 , 8 9 4 , 3 6 4 2 0 , 6 5 1 , 0 6 2 3 6 . 5 5 % 2 2 , 9 9 4 , 6 6 6 3 4 , 8 8 9 , 0 3 0 1 0 7 . 2 0 % Ex p e n d i t u r e s 92 3 , 3 5 1 75 , 0 5 8 2 2 3 , 3 5 5 69 9 , 9 9 6 67 0 , 0 6 5 8 9 3 , 4 2 0 Pu b l i c W o r k s E n g i n e e r i n g 24 . 1 9 % 96 . 7 6 % 7, 6 6 6 , 8 5 6 3 7 7 , 0 1 0 1 , 1 2 4 , 2 5 4 6 , 5 4 2 , 6 0 2 3, 3 7 2 , 7 6 2 4 , 4 9 7 , 0 1 5 Pu b l i c W o r k s D r a i n a g e 14 . 6 6 % 58 . 6 6 % 18 , 1 8 3 , 9 6 2 1 , 4 7 1 , 5 7 4 4 , 3 8 4 , 7 6 5 1 3 , 7 9 9 , 1 9 7 13 , 1 5 4 , 2 9 5 1 7 , 5 3 9 , 0 6 1 Pu b l i c W o r k s S e w e r M t c 24 . 1 1 % 96 . 4 5 % 1, 2 2 4 , 3 9 7 1, 2 2 4 , 3 9 7 Ot h e r U s e s - D e b t S e r v i c e 1, 2 9 5 , 7 4 7 1 0 2 , 0 3 3 3 0 6 , 0 9 9 98 9 , 6 4 8 91 8 , 2 9 8 1 , 2 2 4 , 3 9 7 Ot h e r U s e s - T r a n s f e r s O u t 23 . 6 2 % 94 . 4 9 % 29 , 2 9 4 , 3 1 3 2, 0 2 5 , 6 7 5 6, 0 3 8 , 4 7 3 23 , 2 5 5 , 8 4 0 18 , 1 1 5 , 4 1 9 24 , 1 5 3 , 8 9 3 Ut i l i t i e s To t a l 20 . 6 1 % 82 . 4 5 % 29 , 2 9 4 , 3 1 3 2 , 0 2 5 , 6 7 5 6 , 0 3 8 , 4 7 3 2 3 , 2 5 5 , 8 4 0 18 , 1 1 5 , 4 1 9 2 4 , 1 5 3 , 8 9 3 To t a l E x p e n d i t u r e s % 20 . 6 1 % 82 . 4 5 3, 2 5 1 , 1 1 3 35 0 , 3 0 2 5, 8 5 5 , 8 9 1 (2 , 6 0 4 , 7 7 8 ) 4, 8 7 9 , 2 4 7 10 , 7 3 5 , 1 3 7 En d i n g B a l a n c e 94 R5 5 G A 0 5 7 Ci t y o f K e n t 4/ 1 0 / 2 0 0 8 1 3 : 1 7 : 1 7 1 Pa g e - Go l f C o m p l e x F u n d Ex c l u d e s P r o j e c t s as o f M a r c h 3 1 , 2 0 0 8 Ye a r E n d Re m a i n i n g Un r e a l i z e d R e v e n u e / Mo n t h s Pr o j e c t i o n Ye a r E n d Pe r c e n t Ma r c h Un e x p e n d e d B u d g e t De s c r i p t i o n Bu d g e t Pr o j e c t i o n Re a l i z e d / S p e n t Ye a r t o D a t e Pr o j e c t i o n % o f B u d g e t __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Av a i l a b l e R e s o u r c e s (1 , 5 1 7 , 5 8 5 ) (1 , 5 1 7 , 5 8 5 ) (1 , 5 1 7 , 5 8 5 ) Be g i n n i n g F u n d B a l a n c e 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % (1 , 5 1 7 , 5 8 5 ) (1 , 5 1 7 , 5 8 5 ) 0 (1 , 5 1 7 , 5 8 5 ) To t a l F u n d B a l a n c e 11 . 2 9 % 45 . 1 6 % Ch a r g e s f o r S e r v i c e s 2, 3 1 8 , 0 0 0 1 2 3 , 0 4 7 2 6 1 , 6 8 1 2 , 0 5 6 , 3 1 9 78 5 , 0 4 4 1 , 0 4 6 , 7 2 6 13 . 3 0 % 53 . 2 1 % Mi s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s 90 4 , 2 3 4 51 , 4 4 3 1 2 0 , 2 8 3 78 3 , 9 5 1 36 0 , 8 5 0 4 8 1 , 1 3 3 25 . 0 0 % 10 0 . 0 0 % Op e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r s I n 60 6 , 6 3 1 50 , 5 5 3 1 5 1 , 6 5 8 45 4 , 9 7 3 45 4 , 9 7 3 6 0 6 , 6 3 1 To t a l R e v e n u e 3, 8 2 8 , 8 6 5 22 5 , 0 4 2 53 3 , 6 2 3 3, 2 9 5 , 2 4 2 13 . 9 4 % 1 , 6 0 0 , 8 6 8 2, 1 3 4 , 4 9 0 55 . 7 5 % To t a l A v a i l a b l e R e s o u r c e s 2, 3 1 1 , 2 8 0 2 2 5 , 0 4 2 ( 9 8 3 , 9 6 2 ) 3 , 2 9 5 , 2 4 2 ( 4 2 . 5 7 ) % 1 , 6 0 0 , 8 6 8 6 1 6 , 9 0 5 2 6 . 6 9 % Ex p e n d i t u r e s 2, 6 6 5 , 0 9 5 2 7 0 , 0 8 8 5 7 5 , 8 2 9 2 , 0 8 9 , 2 6 6 1, 7 2 7 , 4 8 8 2 , 3 0 3 , 3 1 7 Pa r k s , R e c r e a t i o n & C o m m S v c 21 . 6 1 % 86 . 4 3 % 60 6 , 6 3 1 60 6 , 6 3 1 Ot h e r U s e s - D e b t S e r v i c e 34 6 , 6 3 1 28 , 8 8 6 86 , 6 5 8 25 9 , 9 7 3 25 9 , 9 7 3 3 4 6 , 6 3 1 Ot h e r U s e s - T r a n s f e r s O u t 25 . 0 0 % 10 0 . 0 0 % 3, 6 1 8 , 3 5 7 29 8 , 9 7 4 66 2 , 4 8 7 2, 9 5 5 , 8 7 0 1, 9 8 7 , 4 6 1 2, 6 4 9 , 9 4 8 Cu l t u r e & R e c r e a t i o n To t a l 18 . 3 1 % 73 . 2 4 % 3, 6 1 8 , 3 5 7 2 9 8 , 9 7 4 6 6 2 , 4 8 7 2 , 9 5 5 , 8 7 0 1, 9 8 7 , 4 6 1 2 , 6 4 9 , 9 4 8 To t a l E x p e n d i t u r e s % 18 . 3 1 % 73 . 2 4 (1 , 3 0 7 , 0 7 7 ) (7 3 , 9 3 2 ) (1 , 6 4 6 , 4 4 9 ) 33 9 , 3 7 2 (3 8 6 , 5 9 3 ) (2 , 0 3 3 , 0 4 3 ) En d i n g B a l a n c e 95 R5 5 G A 0 5 7 Ci t y o f K e n t 4/ 1 0 / 2 0 0 8 1 3 : 1 7 : 4 2 1 Pa g e - In t e r n a l S e r v i c e F u n d s ( w i t h o u t I n s u r a n c e F u n d s ) Ex c l u d e s P r o j e c t s as o f M a r c h 3 1 , 2 0 0 8 Ye a r E n d Re m a i n i n g Un r e a l i z e d R e v e n u e / Mo n t h s Pr o j e c t i o n Ye a r E n d Pe r c e n t Ma r c h Un e x p e n d e d B u d g e t De s c r i p t i o n Bu d g e t Pr o j e c t i o n Re a l i z e d / S p e n t Ye a r t o D a t e Pr o j e c t i o n % o f B u d g e t __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Av a i l a b l e R e s o u r c e s 1, 9 6 4 , 6 4 3 1, 9 6 4 , 6 4 3 1, 9 6 4 , 6 4 3 Be g i n n i n g F u n d B a l a n c e (0 ) 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1, 9 6 4 , 6 4 3 1, 9 6 4 , 6 4 3 (0 ) 1, 9 6 4 , 6 4 3 To t a l F u n d B a l a n c e 24 . 6 6 % 98 . 6 3 % Ch a r g e s f o r S e r v i c e s 10 , 3 6 3 , 3 3 8 8 3 8 , 2 7 9 2 , 5 5 5 , 3 8 9 7 , 8 0 7 , 9 4 9 7, 6 6 6 , 1 6 8 1 0 , 2 2 1 , 5 5 8 24 . 5 0 % 97 . 9 8 % Mi s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s 4, 0 1 9 , 6 3 2 3 2 4 , 5 4 3 9 8 4 , 6 4 4 3 , 0 3 4 , 9 8 8 2, 9 5 3 , 9 3 1 3 , 9 3 8 , 5 7 5 Ot h e r F i n a n c i n g S o u r c e s 9, 1 4 5 10 , 4 1 8 (1 0 , 4 1 8 ) 31 , 2 5 4 41 , 6 7 2 16 . 5 6 % 66 . 2 4 % Op e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r s I n 45 2 , 9 0 3 25 , 0 0 0 75 , 0 0 0 37 7 , 9 0 3 22 5 , 0 0 0 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 To t a l R e v e n u e 14 , 8 3 5 , 8 7 3 1, 1 9 6 , 9 6 7 3, 6 2 5 , 4 5 1 11 , 2 1 0 , 4 2 2 24 . 4 4 % 1 0 , 8 7 6 , 3 5 3 14 , 5 0 1 , 8 0 4 97 . 7 5 % To t a l A v a i l a b l e R e s o u r c e s 16 , 8 0 0 , 5 1 6 1 , 1 9 6 , 9 6 7 5 , 5 9 0 , 0 9 4 1 1 , 2 1 0 , 4 2 2 3 3 . 2 7 % 1 0 , 8 7 6 , 3 5 3 1 6 , 4 6 6 , 4 4 7 9 8 . 0 1 % Ex p e n d i t u r e s 67 3 , 5 0 2 45 , 2 1 7 1 5 8 , 3 0 8 51 5 , 1 9 4 47 4 , 9 2 4 6 3 3 , 2 3 2 Fi n a n c e 23 . 5 1 % 94 . 0 2 % 4, 5 7 6 , 7 0 9 3 8 4 , 4 6 8 1 , 2 1 1 , 0 4 4 3 , 3 6 5 , 6 6 5 3, 6 3 3 , 1 3 3 4 , 8 4 4 , 1 7 7 In f o r m a t i o n T e c h n o l o g y 26 . 4 6 % 10 5 . 8 4 % 4, 4 5 9 , 5 3 3 3 5 4 , 9 4 2 9 6 9 , 3 7 1 3 , 4 9 0 , 1 6 2 2, 9 0 8 , 1 1 4 3 , 8 7 7 , 4 8 5 Fa c i l i t i e s M a n a g e m e n t 21 . 7 4 % 86 . 9 5 % 86 5 , 0 6 7 6 4 7 , 1 8 9 6 4 6 , 7 4 7 21 8 , 3 2 0 1, 9 4 0 , 2 4 2 2 , 5 8 6 , 9 8 9 Fi r e E q u i p m e n t R e p l a c e m e n t 74 . 7 6 % 29 9 . 0 5 % 4, 7 6 2 , 7 8 2 2 0 1 , 8 6 5 7 1 2 , 2 4 6 4 , 0 5 0 , 5 3 6 2, 1 3 6 , 7 3 8 2 , 8 4 8 , 9 8 4 Pu b l i c W o r k s F l e e t S e r v i c e s 14 . 9 5 % 59 . 8 2 % 15 2 , 9 0 3 15 2 , 9 0 3 Ot h e r U s e s - D e b t S e r v i c e 45 2 , 9 0 3 45 2 , 9 0 3 Ot h e r U s e s - T r a n s f e r s O u t 15 , 9 4 3 , 3 9 9 1, 6 3 3 , 6 8 2 3, 6 9 7 , 7 1 7 12 , 2 4 5 , 6 8 2 11 , 0 9 3 , 1 5 0 14 , 7 9 0 , 8 6 6 In t e r n a l S e r v i c e s To t a l 23 . 1 9 % 92 . 7 7 % 15 , 9 4 3 , 3 9 9 1 , 6 3 3 , 6 8 2 3 , 6 9 7 , 7 1 7 1 2 , 2 4 5 , 6 8 2 11 , 0 9 3 , 1 5 0 1 4 , 7 9 0 , 8 6 6 To t a l E x p e n d i t u r e s % 23 . 1 9 % 92 . 7 7 85 7 , 1 1 7 (4 3 6 , 7 1 5 ) 1, 8 9 2 , 3 7 7 (1 , 0 3 5 , 2 6 0 ) (2 1 6 , 7 9 7 ) 1, 6 7 5 , 5 8 1 En d i n g B a l a n c e 96 R5 5 G A 0 5 7 Ci t y o f K e n t 4/ 1 0 / 2 0 0 8 1 3 : 1 7 : 5 5 1 Pa g e - In s u r a n c e F u n d s Ex c l u d e s P r o j e c t s as o f M a r c h 3 1 , 2 0 0 8 Ye a r E n d Re m a i n i n g Un r e a l i z e d R e v e n u e / Mo n t h s Pr o j e c t i o n Ye a r E n d Pe r c e n t Ma r c h Un e x p e n d e d B u d g e t De s c r i p t i o n Bu d g e t Pr o j e c t i o n Re a l i z e d / S p e n t Ye a r t o D a t e Pr o j e c t i o n % o f B u d g e t __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Av a i l a b l e R e s o u r c e s 7, 4 1 7 , 5 0 3 7, 4 1 7 , 5 0 3 7, 4 1 7 , 5 0 3 Be g i n n i n g F u n d B a l a n c e 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 7, 4 1 7 , 5 0 3 7, 4 1 7 , 5 0 3 0 7, 4 1 7 , 5 0 3 To t a l F u n d B a l a n c e 23 . 1 0 % 92 . 4 1 % Mi s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s 15 , 7 2 5 , 8 7 0 1 , 2 2 4 , 2 6 7 3 , 6 3 3 , 0 0 1 1 2 , 0 9 2 , 8 6 9 10 , 8 9 9 , 0 0 2 1 4 , 5 3 2 , 0 0 2 To t a l R e v e n u e 15 , 7 2 5 , 8 7 0 1, 2 2 4 , 2 6 7 3, 6 3 3 , 0 0 1 12 , 0 9 2 , 8 6 9 23 . 1 0 % 1 0 , 8 9 9 , 0 0 2 14 , 5 3 2 , 0 0 2 92 . 4 1 % To t a l A v a i l a b l e R e s o u r c e s 23 , 1 4 3 , 3 7 3 1 , 2 2 4 , 2 6 7 1 1 , 0 5 0 , 5 0 4 1 2 , 0 9 2 , 8 6 9 4 7 . 7 5 % 1 0 , 8 9 9 , 0 0 2 2 1 , 9 4 9 , 5 0 5 9 4 . 8 4 % Ex p e n d i t u r e s 12 5 , 0 0 0 1, 7 6 0 21 , 9 8 3 10 3 , 0 1 7 65 , 9 4 9 87 , 9 3 2 Un e m p l o y m e n t C o m p e n s a t i o n 17 . 5 9 % 70 . 3 5 % 1, 4 3 5 , 5 7 7 63 , 0 2 1 3 5 7 , 1 7 5 1 , 0 7 8 , 4 0 2 1, 0 7 1 , 5 2 5 1 , 4 2 8 , 7 0 0 Wo r k e r s C o m p e n s a t i o n 24 . 8 8 % 99 . 5 2 % 10 , 8 3 6 , 2 2 2 8 7 4 , 3 0 0 2 , 4 5 7 , 8 9 7 8 , 3 7 8 , 3 2 5 7, 3 7 3 , 6 9 2 9 , 8 3 1 , 5 8 9 Me d i c a l I n s u r a n c e 22 . 6 8 % 90 . 7 3 % 1, 8 5 4 , 6 8 4 1 0 5 , 1 6 2 1 , 0 4 5 , 4 7 2 80 9 , 2 1 2 3, 1 3 6 , 4 1 5 4 , 1 8 1 , 8 8 7 Li a b i l i t y I n s u r a n c e 56 . 3 7 % 22 5 . 4 8 % 33 8 , 2 4 6 1, 7 6 0 2 5 7 , 3 0 7 80 , 9 3 9 77 1 , 9 2 2 1 , 0 2 9 , 2 2 9 Pr o p e r t y I n s u r a n c e 76 . 0 7 % 30 4 . 2 8 % 14 , 5 8 9 , 7 2 9 1, 0 4 6 , 0 0 3 4, 1 3 9 , 8 3 4 10 , 4 4 9 , 8 9 5 12 , 4 1 9 , 5 0 3 16 , 5 5 9 , 3 3 7 In t e r n a l S e r v i c e s To t a l 28 . 3 7 % 11 3 . 5 0 % 14 , 5 8 9 , 7 2 9 1 , 0 4 6 , 0 0 3 4 , 1 3 9 , 8 3 4 1 0 , 4 4 9 , 8 9 5 12 , 4 1 9 , 5 0 3 1 6 , 5 5 9 , 3 3 7 To t a l E x p e n d i t u r e s % 28 . 3 7 % 11 3 . 5 0 8, 5 5 3 , 6 4 4 17 8 , 2 6 4 6, 9 1 0 , 6 7 0 1, 6 4 2 , 9 7 4 (1 , 5 2 0 , 5 0 1 ) 5, 3 9 0 , 1 6 8 En d i n g B a l a n c e 97 City of Kent 4/10/2008 13:19:58R55JC021 Street Capital Projects FundFiscal Year: Period: 38 1Page - Fiscal YTD Prj to Date Variance % Prior Years Budget Beginning Fund Balance 87,009- 84,261.60-84,261.60- 2,747.40- 96.84 Fund Balance Adjustments 2,747 2,747.00 Licenses & Permits 9,260- 9,260.00-9,260.00-100.00 Intergovernmental 53,139,381- 41,297,600.95- 1,047,775.99- 42,345,376.94- 10,794,004.06- 79.69 Charges for Services 74,663- 90,715.31- 1,584.02- 92,299.33- 17,636.33 123.62 Miscellaneous Revenues 23,229,929- 19,051,007.82- 100,408.05- 19,151,415.87- 4,078,513.13- 82.44 Non Revenues 16,150,863- 20,784,903.44-20,784,903.44- 4,634,040.44 128.69 Other Financing Sources 16,769,795- 16,791,580.30-16,791,580.30- 21,785.30 100.13 Operating Transfers In 17,037,432- 14,493,606.78- 372,508.05- 14,866,114.83- 2,171,317.17- 87.26 126,495,585-112,602,936.20-1,522,276.11-114,125,212.31-12,370,372.69-90.22Total Available Resources Unallocated Street Projects 18,728 18,728.00 Street Mitigation Receipts 434,923 434,923.00 Central Ave Pavement Rehab 501,000 24,617.29 24,617.29 476,382.71 4.91 Street Light Wiring Upgrade 120,000 30,390.11 30,390.11 89,609.89 25.33 LID 329-Willis & 74th Ave 244,186 640,572.41 640,572.41 396,386.41- 262.33 Misc Intersection Signals 200,000 124,407.95 124,407.95 75,592.05 62.20 Pedestrian Walkways 265,231 200,770.48 811.42 201,581.90 63,649.10 76.00 Traf Signal Control Cabinets 209,183 202,383.89 202,383.89 6,799.11 96.75 Signal Battery Backup 379,776 308,983.96 308,983.96 70,792.04 81.36 124th Avenue Improvements 75,000 75,000.00 248th Street Improvements 75,000 75,000.00 Asphalt Overlays 2007 1,213,029 1,082,232.06 1,408.92- 1,080,823.14 132,205.86 89.10 Sidewalk Renovations 2005 325,222 325,221.94 325,221.94 .06 100.00 Sidewalk Renovations 2008 585,000 585,000.00 Citywide Guardrails 2004 9,681 9,680.37 9,680.37 .63 99.99 Kent Station 4,738,550 3,218,955.02 3,218,955.02 1,519,594.98 67.93 Downtown ITS Improvements 3,850,489 4,294,983.61 76,220.57 4,371,204.18 520,715.18- 113.52 196th Street Corridor-East 1,016,911 618,753.07 618,753.07 398,157.93 60.85 84th Avenue Rehabilitation 314,958 663,933.67 657,931.43 1,321,865.10 1,006,907.10- 419.70 Lincoln Ave/Smith St Improv 5,270.02 71.63 5,341.65 5,341.65- 256th Street - 116th to 132nd 315,277 16,622.75 16,622.75-315,277.00 116th & 248th Intersection 330,406 617.80 617.80 329,788.20 .19 BNSF Grade Separation 12,138,619 3,304,968.20 1,321,327.90 4,626,296.10 7,512,322.90 38.11 Military/Reith Intersection 100,000 30,031.01 30,031.01 69,968.99 30.03 272nd Extension (KK to 256th)4,722,700 5,230,581.60 709,212.11 5,939,793.71 1,217,093.71- 125.77 2nd Avenue Pedestrian Imp 392,710 91,200.77 265,695.11 356,895.88 35,814.12 90.88 LID 361 - 272nd Extension 213,168.31 8,918.87- 204,249.44 204,249.44- 124th Ave & SE 248th St. Imp.257,982 257,982.00 2nd Avenue (Smith & Meeker)50,000 50,000.00 4th Ave Impr (James to Cloudy)1,500,000 276,988.60 95,840.85 372,829.45 1,127,170.55 24.86 Willis St UPRR/BNRR Grade Sepr 341,190 146,326.22 2,471.38 148,797.60 192,392.40 43.61 James Ave Impr (4th to UPRR)134,437.88 319,276.23 453,714.11 453,714.11- 98 City of Kent 4/10/2008 13:19:58R55JC021 Street Capital Projects FundFiscal Year: Period: 38 2Page - Fiscal YTD Prj to Date Variance % Prior Years Budget Event Ctr Floodplain Mitigatio 672,438.34 2,726.41 675,164.75 675,164.75- 256th Imps(Kent Kangley-116th)2,100,000 13,368.06 5,596.63 18,964.69 2,081,035.31 .90 LID 341-196th Corridor Mid 35,333,026 33,851,313.64 33,851,313.64 1,481,712.36 95.81 LID 353 224th-228th Corridor 33,526,911 30,488,049.65 274,750.43 30,762,800.08 2,764,110.92 91.76 224th-228th Corridor East Leg 1,905,882 838,364.16 38,339.20 876,703.36 1,029,178.64 46.00 Russell Road Maint. Facility 178,819.10 483,663.93 662,483.03 662,483.03- East Hill Operations Center 150,580 1,602,087.32 54,442.47 1,656,529.79 1,505,949.79- ******** Hwy 99 HOV Lanes - Phase 1 4,398,063 1,373,429.44 1,373,429.44 3,024,633.56 31.23 Hwy 99 HOV - 240th-252nd 307,075 698,057.48 55.77 698,113.25 391,038.25- 227.34 Hwy 99 HOV - 252nd-SR516 6,727,503 7,158,300.86 6,252.01- 7,152,048.85 424,545.85- 106.31 Hwy 99 HOV Lanes - Phase 2 7,320,794 8,871,707.97 21,048.57 8,892,756.54 1,571,962.54- 121.47 126,495,585 106,942,035.01 4,296,279.49 111,238,314.50 15,257,270.50 87.94Total Expenditures 5,660,901.19-2,774,003.38 2,886,897.81-Ending Balance 99 City of Kent 4/10/2008 13:22:11R55JC021 Parks Capital Projects FundFiscal Year: Period: 38 1Page - Fiscal YTD Prj to Date Variance % Prior Years Budget Beginning Fund Balance 1,145,480- 1,149,387.38-1,149,387.38- 3,907.38 100.34 Intergovernmental 4,846,334- 3,584,901.89- 24,179.30- 3,609,081.19- 1,237,252.81- 74.47 Charges for Services 4,794- 4,862.80-4,862.80-68.80 101.44 Miscellaneous Revenues 3,064,831- 2,940,362.60- 58,750.27- 2,999,112.87- 65,718.13- 97.86 Other Financing Sources 333,109- 33,108.45- 300,000.00- 333,108.45-.55- 100.00 Operating Transfers In 32,805,414- 29,910,923.27- 246,929.78- 30,157,853.05- 2,647,560.95- 91.93 42,199,962-37,623,546.39-629,859.35-38,253,405.74-3,946,556.26-90.65Total Available Resources Lake Fenwick 55,000 10,443.17 855.75 11,298.92 43,701.08 20.54 Parks Fee-in-Lieu 1,794,096 1,794,094.53 1,794,094.53 1.47 100.00 Lake Meridian Boat Ramp Renov 358,414 498,233.74 498,233.74 139,819.74- 139.01 Paths and Trails 83,243 51,330.02 51,330.02 31,912.98 61.66 Three Friends 646,486 650,364.70 650,364.70 3,878.70- 100.60 Adopt-a-Park Program 314,383 263,835.91 7,514.64 271,350.55 43,032.45 86.31 Service Club Ballfields 7,298,410 6,953,174.46 17,649.26- 6,935,525.20 362,884.80 95.03 Clark Lake Outfall 105,879 108,930.55 108,930.55 3,051.55- 102.88 Clark Lake Mgmt Plan/Develop 201,559 166,892.57 1,270.00 168,162.57 33,396.43 83.43 Russell Road Maint Shop 60,000 22,730.86 26,612.46 49,343.32 10,656.68 82.24 Kent Meridian Pool 224,685 195,745.26 195,745.26 28,939.74 87.12 Glenn Nelson Park 433,321 424,320.86 424,320.86 9,000.14 97.92 Turnkey Neighborhood Park 187,041 13,841.91 16,817.24 30,659.15 156,381.85 16.39 Native Plants 52,037 52,037.27 52,037.27 .27- 100.00 Street Tree Replacements 155,103 48,267.76 48,267.76 106,835.24 31.12 East Hill "X" Park 1,965,950 1,871,720.08 19,984.28 1,891,704.36 74,245.64 96.22 Rental Houses Demolition 100,000 88,035.66 88,035.66 11,964.34 88.04 Park Land Acquisition 3,499,608 4,248,092.19 4,248,092.19 748,484.19- 121.39 Van Doren's River Emer Access 20,000 16,929.78 16,929.78 3,070.22 84.65 Seven Oaks Park Improvements 127,947 6,710.15 6,710.15 121,236.85 5.24 Eagle Creek Park Development 187,395 104,065.49 104,065.49 83,329.51 55.53 Botanical Garden 10,000 10,000.00 Town Square Park 3,744,578 4,990,502.26 540,252.87 5,530,755.13 1,786,177.13- 147.70 Riverwalk / Riverview Park Dev 1,900,836 336,950.39 5,999.96 342,950.35 1,557,885.65 18.04 West Fenwick Renovations 1,363,724 145,330.34 24,497.98 169,828.32 1,193,895.68 12.45 Big Blue Mobile Computer Lab 85,000 85,000.00 Tudor Square Renovations 74,768 74,768.00 Kent Parks Foundation 50,000 8,127.41 8,127.41 41,872.59 16.25 132nd Street Park 178,960 136,042.53 136,042.53 42,917.47 76.02 Clark Lake Trails 38,500 29,716.55 206.92 29,923.47 8,576.53 77.72 Clark Lake Outfall IV 21,500 12,365.13 4,223.77- 8,141.36 13,358.64 37.87 Uplands Playfield Parking/St.275,000 250,000.00 250,000.00 25,000.00 90.91 Light Pole Replacement 530,324 287,373.79 287,373.79 242,950.21 54.19 Wilson Playfields 5,571,237 5,577,739.51 5,577,739.51 6,502.51- 100.12 Basketball Court Dev 153,497 138,891.66 138,891.66 14,605.34 90.48 100 City of Kent 4/10/2008 13:22:11R55JC021 Parks Capital Projects FundFiscal Year: Period: 38 2Page - Fiscal YTD Prj to Date Variance % Prior Years Budget Wilson Playfields Acq & Dev 626,336 335,807.44 3,800.77- 332,006.67 294,329.33 53.01 Aquatics Land Acquisition 6,826,316 6,039,611.37 7,034.00 6,046,645.37 779,670.63 88.58 Urban Forestry 15,000 1,440.00 886.01 2,326.01 12,673.99 15.51 Eagle Scout Projects 79,376 35,723.88 9,509.13 45,233.01 34,142.99 56.99 Russell Road Infield Soil 25,000 14,189.74 14,189.74 10,810.26 56.76 228th Corridor Park/Trailhead 60,000 50,000.00 50,000.00 10,000.00 83.33 Multi-use Ballfields/KSD 20,000 20,000.00 Earthworks Stairs 66,246 66,246.00 272nd Neighbor Park Acq & Dev 267,711 193,131.66 193,131.66 74,579.34 72.14 Local Off-Leash Parks 15,000 2,900.72 2,900.72 12,099.28 19.34 Canterbury Park 620,745 522,119.65 522,119.65 98,625.35 84.11 Grant Matching Funds/Land Acq.150,000 3,500.00 3,500.00 146,500.00 2.33 Downtown Gateways, Phase 2 175,000 75,000.00 22,104.47 97,104.47 77,895.53 55.49 Parks Grant Matching 246,655 78,102.59 922.87- 77,179.72 169,475.28 31.29 Park Lifecycle Mtc 2008 324,618 25,860.88 25,860.88 298,757.12 7.97 Park Master Plans 2008 25,000 25,000.00 Misc Contract Services 2006 19,960 15,712.59 15,712.59 4,247.41 78.72 Misc Contract Services 2007 10,000 10,000.00 10,000.00 100.00 Lifecycle-Play Equipment 2007 113,721 12,571.50 12,571.50 101,149.50 11.05 Lifecycle-Play Equipment 2008 60,000 60,000.00 Lifecycle-Ballfields 2007 44,797 39,405.47 4,539.52 43,944.99 852.01 98.10 Lifecycle-Ballfields 2008 25,000 3,450.70 3,450.70 21,549.30 13.80 Lifecycle-Irrigation 2007 50,000 13,650.25 13,650.25 36,349.75 27.30 Lifecycle-Irrigation 2008 25,000 1,045.44 1,045.44 23,954.56 4.18 Lifecycle-Infield Soil 2007 40,000 37,694.39 1,143.45 38,837.84 1,162.16 97.09 Lifecycle-Infield Soil 2008 25,000 25,000.00 Event Center Lifecycle 300,000 300,000.00 Major Entries to Kent 50,000 50,000.00 Multi-Use Sports Field Imprmts 25,000 25,000.00 42,199,962 36,983,397.74 692,989.03 37,676,386.77 4,523,575.23 89.28Total Expenditures 640,148.65-63,129.68 577,018.97-Ending Balance 101 City of Kent 4/10/2008 13:22:49R55JC021 Other Capital Projects FundFiscal Year: Period: 38 1Page - Fiscal YTD Prj to Date Variance % Prior Years Budget Beginning Fund Balance 106,057- 106,057.02-106,057.02-.02 100.00 Fund Balance Adjustments 770 770.00 Intergovernmental 78,600,000-24,497,211.02- 24,497,211.02- 54,102,788.98- 31.17 Charges for Services 20,000- 20,000.00-20,000.00-100.00 Miscellaneous Revenues 558,634- 1,307,368.49- 3,224.40- 1,310,592.89- 751,958.89 234.61 Non Revenues 13,280,774- 14,880,773.83-14,880,773.83- 1,599,999.83 112.05 Other Financing Sources 54,559,230- 49,507,348.58-49,507,348.58- 5,051,881.42- 90.74 Operating Transfers In 10,113,170- 9,248,735.64- 9,354.51- 9,258,090.15- 855,079.85- 91.54 157,237,095-75,070,283.56-24,509,789.93-99,580,073.49-57,657,021.51-63.33Total Available Resources Kent Station 39,454,424 36,059,106.28 36,059,106.28 3,395,317.72 91.39 Event Center 78,600,000 16,600,838.32 7,946,372.70 24,547,211.02 54,052,788.98 31.23 LTGO Bonds - 2000 16,694,696 16,634,722.79 22,719.81 16,657,442.60 37,253.40 99.78 LTGO / Taxable Bonds 2003 7,518,000 7,509,943.16 7,509,943.16 8,056.84 99.89 LTGO Bonds 2006 12,000,000 12,394,510.58 12,394,510.58 394,510.58- 103.29 Replacement Fire Hose 15,000 15,000.00 Downtown Gateways 538,427 538,387.62 538,387.62 39.38 99.99 Fire Equipment Replacement Fnd 300,000 300,000.00 Fire Radio Equipment 326,000 132,399.40 9,672.50 142,071.90 183,928.10 43.58 Olympic Pipeline Project 20,000 16,571.78 16,571.78 3,428.22 82.86 ECC Operating Equipment 180,000 60,943.25 60,943.25 119,056.75 33.86 Breathing Apparatus Cylinders 1,180,548 868,639.31 868,639.31 311,908.69 73.58 Department Equipment 2008 10,000 9,354.51 9,354.51 645.49 93.55 Available Number for Fire 400,000 400,000.00 157,237,095 90,816,062.49 7,988,119.52 98,804,182.01 58,432,912.99 62.84Total Expenditures 15,745,778.93 16,521,670.41-775,891.48-Ending Balance 102 City of Kent 4/10/2008 13:23:10R55JC021 Technology Capital ProjectsFiscal Year: Period: 38 1Page - Fiscal YTD Prj to Date Variance % Prior Years Budget Charges for Services 8,231- 8,479.24-8,479.24- 248.24 103.02 Miscellaneous Revenues 23,503- 45,654.29- 301.20- 45,955.49- 22,452.49 195.53 Non Revenues 190,626.88 190,626.88 190,626.88- Operating Transfers In 25,021,798- 23,778,505.74-23,778,505.74- 1,243,292.26- 95.03 25,053,532-23,642,012.39-301.20-23,642,313.59-1,411,218.41-94.37Total Available Resources Tech Equipment 2001 522,668 469,959.91 469,959.91 52,708.09 89.92 Communications Replacement 1,527,292 1,530,000.00 1,530,000.00 2,708.00- 100.18 Technology Plan 1998 12,380,572 12,221,681.16 12,221,681.16 158,890.84 98.72 ERP System Upgrade 1,000,000 148,664.10 31,970.83 180,634.93 819,365.07 18.06 Police Project 1,870,197 1,735,181.52 15,170.00 1,750,351.52 119,845.48 93.59 Wireless Pilot 25,602 25,602.18 25,602.18 .18- 100.00 Municipal Court 74,000 2,329.75 2,329.75 71,670.25 3.15 Legal/Prosecution 80,000 18,157.49 29,446.64 47,604.13 32,395.87 59.51 Network Backbone Phase I 354,173 354,172.83 354,172.83 .17 100.00 Network Backbone Phase II 154,996 154,995.72 154,995.72 .28 100.00 Lifecycle Server Replacement 285,494 285,494.37 285,494.37 .37- 100.00 Exchange 2003 Upgrade 75,961 75,960.46 75,960.46 .54 100.00 Building Wiring 90,000 63,447.52 63,447.52 26,552.48 70.50 Network Security 40,564 40,563.68 40,563.68 .32 100.00 Training 19,127 19,126.70 19,126.70 .30 100.00 Online Permits 60,000 60,000.00 Online Payment Infrastructure 51,000 16,885.98 16,885.98 34,114.02 33.11 Website Redesign 58,000 102,829.00 102,829.00 44,829.00- 177.29 Electronic Forms Infrastructur 51,220 51,219.97 51,219.97 .03 100.00 Online City Code 1,592 1,591.20 1,591.20 .80 99.95 Contingency Other 84,640 52,364.55 52,364.55 32,275.45 61.87 Document Management 2003 47,860 47,860.00 47,860.00 100.00 Document Management 2004 39,395 39,395.00 39,395.00 100.00 Accella GIS 30,314 30,314.00 30,314.00 100.00 Kiva 7.1 Upgrade 23,225 34,824.59 147.73 34,972.32 11,747.32- 150.58 Database Projects 6,357 6,356.42 6,356.42 .58 99.99 Software Tools 9,855 9,855.07 9,855.07 .07- 100.00 Parks Planning CAD 3,324 3,323.44 3,323.44 .56 99.98 Pathlore LMS 18,000 18,000.00 Clerk Records Tracking System 2,056 2,055.62 2,055.62 .38 99.98 UPS Upgrade 122,658 122,657.98 122,657.98 .02 100.00 Replace Cable TV Equipment 30,606 30,605.87 30,605.87 .13 100.00 Cable TV Mastering Station 8,141 8,141.20 8,141.20 .20- 100.00 Call Pilot Upgrade 3,012 3,011.58 3,011.58 .42 99.99 Symposium Upgrade 35,975 35,975.19 35,975.19 .19- 100.00 Training 20,270 20,269.91 20,269.91 .09 100.00 Training Room Update 9,345 9,344.77 9,344.77 .23 100.00 103 City of Kent 4/10/2008 13:23:10R55JC021 Technology Capital ProjectsFiscal Year: Period: 38 2Page - Fiscal YTD Prj to Date Variance % Prior Years Budget Laptop Replacement 78,348 78,347.64 78,347.64 .36 100.00 MDC Replacement 116,268 116,268.38 116,268.38 .38- 100.00 Online Training Content 20,622 20,622.00 20,622.00 100.00 Third-Party Software Licenses 14,328 14,328.10 14,328.10 .10- 100.00 Microsoft License Management 306,398 306,397.68 306,397.68 .32 100.00 Customer Services Cashiering 19,000 18,609.19 18,609.19 390.81 97.94 Fire Systems 15,000 6,024.65 1,018.00- 5,006.65 9,993.35 33.38 Utility Billing System 443,345 237,163.50 237,163.50 206,181.50 53.49 Streaming Video 18,000 17,533.67 17,533.67 466.33 97.41 Network Upgrade/Reconfigure 11,000 11,894.89 11,894.89 894.89- 108.14 GIS Migration 76,686 66,100.37 66,100.37 10,585.63 86.20 Document Management 2005 16,971 12,226.29 12,226.29 4,744.71 72.04 Wireless Network 264,762 52,040.79 52,040.79 212,721.21 19.66 Wireless Evidence Barcoding 985 1,064.19 1,064.19 79.19- 108.04 Crime Analysis 70,000 70,000.00 Tiburon Upgrade 62,950 62,950.00 Public Safety IT Staffing 204,892 350,994.50 58,422.80 409,417.30 204,525.30- 199.82 Server Replacement 2005 51,633 51,632.59 51,632.59 .41 100.00 Server Replacement 2006 50,000 60,670.14 60,670.14 10,670.14- 121.34 ERP IT Staffing 201,000 298,428.72 26,889.10 325,317.82 124,317.82- 161.85 Fire MDC Replacement 155,982 155,981.59 155,981.59 .41 100.00 Pending Proj - End User HW/SW 20,252 4,854.22 4,854.22 15,397.78 23.97 Microsoft Licensing 2005 93,602 91,215.55 91,215.55 2,386.45 97.45 Laptop Replacement 2005 50,000 32,456.13 32,456.13 17,543.87 64.91 Kent Station Hot Zone 50,000 41,515.50 41,515.50 8,484.50 83.03 Pending Proj - Public Safety 16,058 5,744.64 5,744.64 10,313.36 35.77 Training 2006 25,000 19,076.05 19,076.05 5,923.95 76.30 Backup & Recovery Solution 150,000 143,814.74 143,814.74 6,185.26 95.88 Lifecycle Replacements 1,577,690 636,512.88 232,597.44 869,110.32 708,579.68 55.09 Multimedia eForm 10,000 10,000.00 Permit Center Fill/Print Forms 30,771 30,771.35 30,771.35 .35- 100.00 ERP 8.12 Training/Consulting 30,000 17,572.50 6,270.00 23,842.50 6,157.50 79.48 Large Format Scanning 24,196 3,261.95 3,261.95 20,934.05 13.48 Utility Billing Backfill 65,000 76,070.92 76,070.92 11,070.92- 117.03 Centralized AP OT 2005/2006 17,000 1,334.94 1,334.94 15,665.06 7.85 JE Workflow Scanners/Equip 45,000 37,995.84 6,601.56 44,597.40 402.60 99.11 P-Cards Backfill 2005/2006 35,000 46,275.54 46,275.54 11,275.54- 132.22 Sunpro Citrix Servers 10,003 10,003.08 10,003.08 .08- 100.00 Digital Cable Upgrade 110,040 294,369.25 15,347.42 309,716.67 199,676.67- 281.46 Valley Comm. Mobile Mapping 28,000 12,337.92 12,337.92 15,662.08 44.06 2006 PC Replacements 235,238 174,650.12 174,650.12 60,587.88 74.24 JDE Upgr Customer Trng/Backfil 48,000 3,401.22 16,902.21 20,303.43 27,696.57 42.30 Enterprise GIS Planning 67,470 49,600.00 49,600.00 17,870.00 73.51 Training 77,500 13,016.27 6,523.11- 6,493.16 71,006.84 8.38 104 City of Kent 4/10/2008 13:23:10R55JC021 Technology Capital ProjectsFiscal Year: Period: 38 3Page - Fiscal YTD Prj to Date Variance % Prior Years Budget Content Management System 300,000 76,395.20 76,395.20 223,604.80 25.47 Connected Comm. Prog/Prog Mgr 58,000 49,518.78 54,367.55 103,886.33 45,886.33- 179.11 Staff 86,754 86,754.00 Software Projects 34,700 6,213.83 6,213.83 28,486.17 17.91 Hardware Projects 80,000 46,515.49 999.70 47,515.19 32,484.81 59.39 Network Projects 19,600 9,029.72 9,029.72 10,570.28 46.07 Comcast Cable Franchise Negot.77,952 77,952.00 Video Projects 60,000 60,000.00 In-plant Bus. Product Phase I 55,000 55,000.00 25,003,487 21,584,071.24 487,591.87 22,071,663.11 2,931,823.89 88.27Total Expenditures 50,045-2,057,941.15-487,290.67 1,570,650.48-Ending Balance 105 City of Kent 4/10/2008 13:23:43R55JC021 Facilities Capital ProjectsFiscal Year: Period: 38 1Page - Fiscal YTD Prj to Date Variance % Prior Years Budget Charges for Services 1,779- 1,824.42-1,824.42-45.42 102.55 Miscellaneous Revenues 157,458- 157,458.38-157,458.38-.38 100.00 Operating Transfers In 7,999,938- 7,602,095.71- 53,738.45- 7,655,834.16- 344,103.84- 95.70 8,159,175-7,761,378.51-53,738.45-7,815,116.96-344,058.04-95.78Total Available Resources Senior Center Greenhouse Exp 652,981 652,981.20 652,981.20 .20- 100.00 Municipal Lot 125,000 299,261.06 299,261.06 174,261.06- 239.41 Fire Security Fences 140,000 67,596.50 147.02 67,743.52 72,256.48 48.39 Fire Exhaust Systems 342,608 262,980.20 262,980.20 79,627.80 76.76 Facility Minor Renovations 187,153 155,444.14 155,444.14 31,708.86 83.06 Resource Ctr Security Upgrades 25,000 14,213.16 14,213.16 10,786.84 56.85 Courtyard & Sidewalk Renov 737,982 747,475.83 747,475.83 9,493.83- 101.29 IT Annex Furniture/CATV Furn.15,000 9,914.46 205.87 10,120.33 4,879.67 67.47 Facilities Card Access 2008 65,000 65,000.00 Centennial Garage Seismic 657,653 654,644.67 654,644.67 3,008.33 99.54 Legal and Parks Renovations 350,632 331,946.09 9.67 331,955.76 18,676.24 94.67 Senior Center Upgrades 40,000 40,000.00 East Hill Shops Artwork 50,000 23,000.00 23,000.00 27,000.00 46.00 City Hall Upgrades 25,000 25,000.00 Fire Station Grnds Renovation 50,000 50,000.00 Corrections Improvements 2003 465,243 436,398.73 22,719.81 459,118.54 6,124.46 98.68 East Hill M&O Facility Land 3,954,923 3,954,923.00 3,954,923.00 100.00 Remodel Washington Av Fire Stn 150,000 8,604.83 8,604.83 141,395.17 5.74 Permit Center Minor Renovation 40,000 490.49 30,528.15 31,018.64 8,981.36 77.55 Police Patrol Remodel 30,000 13,737.29 13,737.29 16,262.71 45.79 Expansion Police/Fire Trng Ctr 30,000 32,240.20 2,240.00- 30,000.20 .20- 100.00 Range Netting-(Golf)25,000 25,000.00 8,159,175 7,642,851.85 74,370.52 7,717,222.37 441,952.63 94.58Total Expenditures 118,526.66-20,632.07 97,894.59-Ending Balance 106 City of Kent 4/10/2008 13:24:11R55JC021 Water FundFiscal Year: Period: 38 1Page -Projects Only Fiscal YTD Prj to Date Variance % Prior Years Budget Beginning Fund Balance 193,927- 193,926.30-193,926.30-.70- 100.00 Intergovernmental 751,892- 591,020.75-591,020.75- 160,871.25- 78.60 Charges for Services 1,488- 3,418.49-3,418.49- 1,930.49 229.74 Miscellaneous Revenues 723,891- 2,428,065.26- 87,843.52- 2,515,908.78- 1,792,018.14 347.55 Non Revenues 20,024,729- 20,024,728.53-20,024,728.53-100.00 Other Financing Sources 2,500,903.04-2,500,903.04- 2,500,903.04 Operating Transfers In 29,931,757- 27,824,756.99- 8,856.70- 27,833,613.69- 2,098,143.31- 92.99 51,627,683-53,566,819.36-96,700.22-53,663,519.58-2,035,836.41 103.94Total Available Resources Seismic Vulnerability Assess 901,311 514,754.09 514,754.09 386,556.91 57.11 Water Comp Plan Update 2007 500,000 2,138.64 29,410.01 31,548.65 468,451.35 6.31 Groundwater Study 100,000 178,298.01 178,298.01 78,298.01- 178.30 Elec/Mech Engr Analysis 75,000 75,000.00 Water Conservation Plan 407,000 411,464.05 3,820.00 415,284.05 8,284.05- 102.04 Water Unallocated Projects 200,000 200,000.00 Rock Creek Mitigation Projects 550,000 62.50 62.50 549,937.50 .01 Russell Road Nursery 250,000 2,381.90 2,381.90 247,618.10 .95 Clark Springs HCP 167,016 403,410.37 22,015.98 425,426.35 258,410.35- 254.72 Tacoma Intertie 32,509,252 27,270,762.26 162,786.31 27,433,548.57 5,075,703.07 84.39 CS Monitor/CS Roof/CS Well 18,000 18,000.00 3.5 Mixing/Blue Boy Mix/98th 105,000 105,000.00 Clark Springs Tran Main Repair 10,000 10,000.00 Clark Springs Well #2VFD Repl.12,000 12,000.00 Seismic System Controls 100,000 100,000.00 Corrosion Control 2,724,470 1,450,428.54 44,906.32 1,495,334.86 1,229,135.14 54.89 Pump Station #3 Replacement 721,572 105,321.16 105,321.16 616,250.84 14.60 Kent Springs Source Upgrade 527,779 319,284.46 319,284.46 208,494.07 60.50 Pump Station #5 Add Pump 113,457 113,714.30 113,714.30 257.30- 100.23 Kent Springs Trans Main Repair 250,000 250,000.00 Pump Station #8 VFD's 15,000 8,856.70 8,856.70 6,143.30 59.04 Misc Water Improvements 780,000 414,557.23 45,095.50 459,652.73 320,347.27 58.93 Additional Water Source Dev 1,554,824 1,035,845.60 1,035,845.60 518,978.40 66.62 Well Head Protection 271,384 162,648.51 162,648.51 108,735.49 59.93 Security Improvement per VA 20,000 20,000.00 East Hill Pressure Zone 160,000 160,000.00 Impoundment Reservoir 1,075,000 2,086,175.79 757.71 2,086,933.50 1,011,933.50- 194.13 East Hill Reservoir 474,000 244,303.81 244,303.81 229,696.19 51.54 East Hill Well Supply Assess.200,000 1,145.25 1,145.25 198,854.75 .57 Kent Kangley Road Repair 350,000 4,867.00 4,867.00 345,133.00 1.39 Asset Management System 26,532 5,000.00 5,000.00 21,532.00 18.85 East Hill Well Generator 70,000 70,000.00 Misc Water Mains 2005 1,414,187 1,414,187.00 15,226.59 1,429,413.59 15,226.59- 101.08 Hydrant Replacement 2005 115,043 8,044.92 8,044.92 106,998.08 6.99 107 City of Kent 4/10/2008 13:24:11R55JC021 Water FundFiscal Year: Period: 38 2Page -Projects Only Fiscal YTD Prj to Date Variance % Prior Years Budget Hydrant Replacement 2008 30,000 30,000.00 Large Meter/Vault Replace 2008 168,341 168,341.00 Kent Station - Water 117,982 109,197.68 109,197.68 8,784.32 92.55 Downtown ITS Improvements 145,100 233,131.16 233,131.16 88,031.16- 160.67 Remote Telemetry Upgrade 448,368 425,737.95 22,797.05 448,535.00 167.00- 100.04 BNSF Grade Separation 205,000 205,000.00 272nd Extension (KK to 116th)178 300,480.43 300,480.43 300,302.43- ******** LID 341-196th Corridor Mid 194,888 194,002.60 194,002.60 885.40 99.55 LID 353 224th-228th Corridor 100,000 149,099.50 149,099.50 49,099.50- 149.10 Russell Road Maint. Facility 600,000 2,639.64 2,639.64 597,360.36 .44 East Hill Operations Center 2,850,000 1,867.40 1,867.40 2,848,132.60 .07 Hwy 99 HOV Lanes - Phase 1 14,110.32 14,110.32 14,110.32- 51,627,683 37,579,062.07 355,672.17 37,934,734.24 13,692,948.93 73.48Total Expenditures 15,987,757.29-258,971.95 15,728,785.34-Ending Balance 108 City of Kent 4/10/2008 13:24:39R55JC021 Sewerage FundFiscal Year: Period: 38 1Page -Projects Only Fiscal YTD Prj to Date Variance % Prior Years Budget Beginning Fund Balance 2,417,078- 2,417,078.39-2,417,078.39-.39 100.00 Intergovernmental 3,265,173- 1,654,509.64-1,654,509.64- 1,610,663.36- 50.67 Charges for Services 5,613- 295,238.65-45.91- 295,284.56- 289,671.56 ******** Miscellaneous Revenues 370,736- 250,731.77- 5,000.00- 255,731.77- 115,004.23- 68.98 Non Revenues 657,572- 525,791.92-525,791.92- 131,780.08- 79.96 Other Financing Sources 1,500,000- 1,500,000.00-1,500,000.00-100.00 Operating Transfers In 23,342,636- 20,138,198.42- 644.00- 20,138,842.42- 3,203,793.58- 86.27 31,558,808-26,781,548.79-5,689.91-26,787,238.70-4,771,569.30-84.88Total Available Resources NPDES Permit 1,795,000 388,923.74 64,819.22 453,742.96 1,341,257.04 25.28 Drainage Master Plan 1,000,000 241,540.66 207,681.06 449,221.72 550,778.28 44.92 Integrated Pest Management 150,000 150,000.00 Drainage Unallocated Projects 100,000 100,000.00 Misc Environmental Projects 640,562 350,447.50 25,593.12 376,040.62 264,521.38 58.70 Mill Creek Trunk 2,086,746 1,761,530.53 500.00 1,762,030.53 324,715.47 84.44 Seven Oaks Pond Imps 2,886.13 2,886.13 2,886.13- Soos Creek Basin Improve 1,492,792 1,360,338.94 1,360,338.94 132,453.06 91.13 LID 352-3rd Avenue Storm 2,304,572 2,297,073.36 2,297,073.36 7,498.64 99.67 Lower Garrison Creek 1,825,171 1,136,640.47 2,868.84 1,139,509.31 685,661.69 62.43 Earthworks Overlays 625,000 102,652.40 48,614.82 151,267.22 473,732.78 24.20 Horseshoe Acres Pump Station 500,000 482,253.43 482,253.43 17,746.57 96.45 256th Flume 510,000 438,417.88 438,417.88 71,582.12 85.96 Lake Meridian Outlet 1,730,689 1,251,924.65 8,645.53 1,260,570.18 470,118.82 72.84 Soosette Creek/Springwood Apts 20,000 14,134.09 14,134.09 5,865.91 70.67 Upper Meridian Crk 234th/236th 375,000 420,563.35 30.36 420,593.71 45,593.71- 112.16 Upper Meridian Valley Creek 90,000 67,544.11 30.36 67,574.47 22,425.53 75.08 E Fork Soosette Crk/144th Clvt 65,000 65,000.00 Meridian Valley Crk Revegetate 800.00 800.00 800.00- Misc Drainage 2008 749,608 15,146.82 15,146.82 734,461.18 2.02 Drainage Imp. w/Rd Imp.Unalloc 1,000,000 1,000,000.00 Drainage Infractructure Improv 1,000,000 23,560.37 29,775.06 53,335.43 946,664.57 5.33 Kent Station - Drainage 226,831 142,758.17 142,758.17 84,072.83 62.94 Downtown ITS Improvements 158,406.09 158,406.09 158,406.09- 116th & 248th Intersection 7,072 7,072.00 Remote Telemetry Upgrade 149,456 93,385.03 2,725.57 96,110.60 53,345.40 64.31 BNSF Grade Separation 993,000 993,000.00 Military/Reith Intersection 100,000 100,000.00 272nd Extension (KK to 116th)500,942 421,042.32 93,764.74 514,807.06 13,865.06- 102.77 Endangered Species Act Study 460,000 470,244.42 470,244.42 10,244.42- 102.23 124th Ave & SE 248th St. Imp.250,000 250,000.00 2nd Avenue (Smith & Meeker)50,000 50,000.00 Event Ctr Floodplain Mitigatio 7,697.15 7,697.15 7,697.15- LID 341-196th Corridor Mid 1,359,000 1,167,076.54 1,167,076.54 191,923.46 85.88 109 City of Kent 4/10/2008 13:24:39R55JC021 Sewerage FundFiscal Year: Period: 38 2Page -Projects Only Fiscal YTD Prj to Date Variance % Prior Years Budget 224th-228th Corridor 1,500,000 1,483,686.12 1,483,686.12 16,313.88 98.91 Russell Road Maint. Facility 1,205.23 296.49 1,501.72 1,501.72- East Hill Operations Center 250,000 250,000.00 Hwy 99 HOV Lanes - Phase 1 2,051,200 1,811,949.34 1,811,949.34 239,250.66 88.34 Hwy 99 HOV Lanes - Phase 2 1,976,930 2,178,026.99 2,178,026.99 201,096.99- 110.17 Sanitary Sewer Master Plan 1,000,000 36,557.85 6,254.97 42,812.82 957,187.18 4.28 Unallocated Sewer Projects 200,000 200,000.00 LID 360-SE 227th Sewer 216,000 298,265.30 1,981.35 300,246.65 84,246.65- 139.00 Misc Sewer 2007 1,483,580 24,780.50 13,088.97 37,869.47 1,445,710.53 2.55 Kent Station - Sewer 229,935 93,935.42 93,935.42 135,999.58 40.85 Downtown ITS Improvements 12,967.74 12,967.74 12,967.74- Remote Telemetry Upgrade 149,456 99,876.36 4,037.21 103,913.57 45,542.43 69.53 272nd Extension (KK to 116th)86,290 518,166.10 1,742.40 519,908.50 433,618.50- 602.51 LID 341-196th Corridor Mid 8,976 8,737.87 8,737.87 238.13 97.35 224th-228th Corridor 132,566.92 132,566.92 132,566.92- East Hill Operations Center 250,000 250,000.00 31,558,808 19,502,563.07 527,596.89 20,030,159.96 11,528,648.04 63.47Total Expenditures 7,278,985.72-521,906.98 6,757,078.74-Ending Balance 110