Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFRA1978-0134 - Other - 3H Cable Communications Consultants - Review of Franchise Request - 05/01/1986 A C SON OF 3H MANAGEMENT 6 CONSULTANTS, l Cable Communications Consultants 4517 CALIFORNIA AVENUE SOUTHWEST, SUITE B ❑ SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98116 ❑ (206) 935-9040 b 1 May t, 1986 MAY 2 1986 L J F I Steve DiJulio I� =Y City Attorney KENT CITY HALL 220 South 4th Kent, WA 98032 Dear Mr. DiJulio: We have enclosed a copy of a letter which is addressed to Gary Hokenson, Statewide Manager of TCI Cablevision of Washington, Inc. The issues discussed are most likely the same issues that the City will want resolved prior to approving the request for transfer from Group W to TCI Cablevision of Washington, Inc. For your information, TCI has been somewhat unwilling to include any items such as these in a document that approves the transfer but rather has agreed to make such commitments in a separate letter signed by an officer of the corporation. In most surrounding communities this has been acceptable. Please let us know if you have any questions or if we can be of any further assistance in this matter. Sincerely, 3- CAB UNICATIONS CONSULTANTS A. ur Vice President/Director LAH:smw Enclosure cc: Mike Webby, Administrative Assistant A D ON OF 3H MANAGEMENT 6 CONSULTANTS, I ' Cable Communications Consultants 4517 CALIFORNIA AVENUE SOUTHWEST, SUITE B ❑ SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98116 ❑ (206) 935-9040 May 1, 1986 Gary Hokenson Statewide Manager TCI Cablevision of Washington, Inc. 1214 114th Ave. S.E. Bellevue, WA 98004 Dear Mr. Hokenson: You have expressed concern regarding the time frame in which the City of Kent has scheduled the transfer of Group W's franchise to TCI Cablevision of Washington, Inc. In response to your concerns, we have reviewed the request for franchise transfer within the City of Kent and have put together the following list of issues which we would like a response to prior to the public hearing on May 19th. Once this response is received we anticipate that we will have covered all the concerns that may be brought up at that time and should ensure no further delays in the franchise transfer process. 1) While there appears to be no reason to question the financial resources of Tele-Communications, Inc. (the Denver corporation), the question may arise as to whether TCI Cablevision of Washington, Inc. has adequate financial resources. Please provide information supporting TCI Cablevision of Washington, Inc.'s ability to construct, operate and maintain a cable television system within the City of Kent. 2) In your March 19th letter to our office, you stated, in reference to uncabled areas, "TCI will commit to serve these small extensions". The questions that may likely be brought up at the meeting are the location of such extensions and the time frame in which they will be completed. It would be very helpful if a map outlining these areas and the time schedule could be provided prior to May 19th. 3) In addition, the representatives from TCI Cablevision of Washington, Inc. should, as discussed previously, be prepared to respond concerning these three additional issues: a) That the entire upgrading of the cable system within the City of Kent has been completed. b) That upon proper Council action, TCI Cablevision of Washington, Inc. will agree to pay a franchise fee of 5% as provided for in the Cable Communications Policy-6cLsfZ84• c) That TCI Cablevision of Washington, Inc. will provide the City with an access channel for its use. Gary Hokenson Page 2 May 1, 1986 In conclusion, as these are the areas in which we believe questions may arise before the Council approves the franchise transfer from Group W to TCI Cablevision of Washington, Inc., it is our opinion that it would be in the best interest of all parties involved to have each completely resolved before May 19th. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, 3- CAB E'C U ICATIONS CONSULTANTS Lon A. H r Vice President/Director LAH:smw cc: Mike Webby, Administrative Assistant Steve DiJulio, City Attorney