Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1872Resolution No. 1872 (Amending or Repealing Resolutions) Countywide Planning Resolution Passed -2/19/2013 The date ["Begmmng July 1, 1998") has led to confusion This date w1ll be deleted from cover sheets of ord1nance/resolut1on reviSIOn pages This cover sheet Will be deleted on electronic pages only, no other delet1ons or changes have been made to the document-6/21/2012 RESOLUTION NO. /77:Z A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washmgton, ratifying the King County Countywide Plann1ng Policies adopted by the Metropolitan K1ng County Council and pursuant to the Growth Management Act. RECITALS A. The adoption of countywide planning policies is required under the State Growth Management Act (GMA), pursuant to RCW 36. 70A.210. The Countyw1de Plann1ng Pol1c1es (CPPs) prov1de a framework for Kent and other c1t1es 1n Kmg County to conduct planning under the requirements of GMA. Th1s framework ensures that City and county comprehensive plans are consistent. On December 3, 2012, the Metropolitan Kmg County Council approved and rat1f1ed a comprehensive amendment to the CPPs approved by the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC). The County Council also approved amendments to policies related to school s1tmg and housing, as well as amendments to potential annexation areas of Seattle and Black Diamond, and add1t1onal amendments to the Urban Growth Area and Potent1al Annexat1on Area Map. Now the amendments are presented to JUrisdiCtions in Kmg County for rat1f1cation. B. On December 3, 2012, the follow1ng GMPC motions to amend the CPPs were approved and rat1f1ed by the full County Council: Countywide Planning Resolution 1. GMPC Motion No. 11-1: Approves the 2011 King County Countywide Plann1ng Policies representing the first comprehensive update of the CPPs s1nce they were ongmally adopted in 1992. 2. GMPC Motion No. 12-1: Adds lands on the west bank of the Duwamish River to the city of Seattle Potential Annexat1on Area. 3. GMPC Motion No. 12-2: Implements the recommendations of the school siting task force by adding new policies and the Report of the School Siting Task Force as Appendix 5 to the CPPs. 4. GMPC Mot1on No. 12-3: Adds a new housing chapter and rev1sed hous1ng appendix to the CPPs. 5. GMPC Motion No. 12-4: Adds land on the west side of 216th Ave SE to the city of Black Diamond Potent1al Annexation Area. 6. GMPC Motion No. 12-5: Amends the Urban Growth Area of Kmg County and modifies the Potential Annexation Area Map m the CPPs. The amendments are supported by the affected cities. C. The King County Council approved and ratified these amendments on behalf of Kmg County pursuant to King County Ordinance Nos. 17486 and 17487 ... The Kent Economic & Commun1ty Development Comm1ttee reviewed these amendments at its meeting on February 11, 2013. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: RESOLUTION SECTION 1. -Amendment. The City of Kent, acting pursuant to the mterlocal agreement among King County, the City of Seattle, and incorporated suburban Cities, hereby ratifies the proposed amendments to the Countywide Plannmg Policies as adopted by the Metropolitan King County Council m King County Ordinance Nos. 17486 and 17487, attached and mcorporated hereto as Exhibit A. SECTION 2. -Public Inspection. The amendments to the Countywide Planntng Poltcies adopted herein shall be filed wtth the City Clerk and placed 1n the plannmg serv1ces offtce so they are available for inspection by the public. SECTION 3. -Severability. If any sect1on, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolut1on is declared unconstttuttonal or invalid for any reason, such dectston shall not affect the valtdity of the rematntng portions of this resolution. SECTION 4. -Rat1ficat10n. Any act consistent wtth the authonty and prior to the effective date of thts resolution is hereby rattfied and affirmed. SECTION 5. -Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect Immediately upon tts passage. PASSED at a regular open public meetmg by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, thislffav of ft.6ruw:J , 2013. CONCURRED in by the Mayor of the City of Kent this JVl-f!-day of /iibr~ , 2013. ATIEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: P \Civii\Resolutlon\Countywldepfannlngpolldesratlfy 2013 Docx 1 2 3 4 5 b1 KING COUNTY Signature Report 1200 Kmg County Courthouse S 16 Th1rd Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 King County December 4, 2012 Ordinance 17486 Proposed No. 2012-0282.3 Sponsors Phillips AN ORDINANCE relating to adoption and ratification of the King County Countywide Planning Policies; adding a new section to K C.C. chapter 20.1 0, decodifying K.C.C. 20.10.010, K.C.C. 20.10.020, K.C.C. 20.10.030, K.C.C. 20.10.040, K.C.C. 20.10.050, K.C.C. 20 10.065, K.C.C. 6 20.10.075 and K.C.C. 20.10.076 and repealing Ordinance 7 10450, Section 6, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.060. 8 STATEMENT OF FACTS: 9 1. The Countywide Planning Policies ("CPPs") are adopted in accordance 10 with the state Growth Management Act, under 36.70A.210 RCW. 11 2. The Growth Management Planning Council ("GMPC") was formed in 12 1992 to guide the development of the CPPs. The GMPC is a 13 representative body of elected officials from King County, the city of 14 Seattle, the city of Bellevue and the Suburban Cities Association. 15 Representatives of the special districts serve as ex officio members. 16 3. The CPPs establish a framework for guiding development in all King 17 County jurisdictions. 1 9 ---------------------- 10 Ordinance 17486 18 4. The CPPs are deemed adopted when ratified by Kmg County and the 19 requisite number of cities and satisfying the required population 20 percentage. 21 5. The GMPC recommends CPP amendments to the King County council 22 for consideration, possible revision and ratification. 23 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 24 SECTION 1. Findings: 25 A. On September 21,2011, the Growth Management Planning Council adopted 26 Motion 11-1 approving the 2011 King County Countywide Planning Policies. 27 B. On March 31, 2012, the school siting task force issued a final report. 28 C. On April4, 2012, the Growth Management Planning Council adopted Motion 29 12-1 adding land on the west bank of the Duwamish river to the city of Seattle Potential 30 Annexation Area. 31 D. On June 6, 2012, the Growth Management Planning Council adopted Motion 32 12-2 implementing the recommendations of the school siting task force by adding new 33 policies and the Report of the School Siting Task Force as Appendix 5 to the Countywide 34 Plannmg Policies. 35 E. On June 6, 2012, the Growth Management Planning Council adopted Motion 36 12-3 adding a new housing chapter and revtsed housing appendix to the Countywide 37 Planning Policies. 38 F. On June 6, 2012, the Growth Management Planning Council adopted Motion 39 12-4 adding land on the west side of216th Ave SE to the city of Black Diamond 40 Potential Annexation Area. 2 11 Ordinance 17 486 41 G. Attachment A to this ordinance incorporates Motions 11-1, 12-1, 12-2, 12-3 42 and 12-4 into the 2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies. 43 SECTION 2. The amendments to the King County Countywide Planning 44 Policies, and renamed the 2012 King County Planning Policies, as shown in Attachment 45 A to this ordinance, are hereby adopted and ratified on behalf of the population of 46 unincorporated King County. 47 NEW SECTION. SECTION 3. There is hereby added to K.C.C. chapter 20.10 a 48 new section to read as follows: 49 · A. After the Growth Management Planning Council approves or amends the 50 Countywide Planning Policies, the executive, as its chair, shall timely transmit to the 51 King County council an ordinance adopting the Countywide Planning Policies or 52 amendments thereto. 53 B. The King County council shall refer the proposed ordinance transmitted by the 54 executive under subsectiOn A. ofthts sectiOn to the committee on transportation, 55 economy and environment or its successor for review and consideration. If the King 56 County council recommends substantive revisions to the Countywide Planning Policies 57 or amendments approved by the Growth Management Planning Council, the King County 58 council may refer the proposed revisions to the Growth Management Planning Council 59 for its consideration and response. 60 C. Within ten days after the ordinance transmitted by the executive under 61 subsection A. of this section, as amended by the council, is effective, the clerk of the 62 King County council shall send the notice of enactment and the Countywide Planning 63 Policies and amendments to each city and town in King County for ratification as 3 Ordinance 17 486 64 provided for in the Countywide Planning Policies. Each city and town must take action 65 to ratify or reject the proposed Countywide Planning Policies or amendments as approved 66 by the King County council within ninety days after the date the ordinance approving the 67 Countywide Plannmg Policies or amendments was enacted. Failure of a city or town to 68 take action and notify the clerk of the King County council within ninety days shall be 69 deemed to be approval by that city or town. The notice shall include the date by which 70 each city or town must respond with its response to ratify or reject the proposed 71 Countywide Planning Policies or amendments and where the response should be directed. 72 D. Countywide Planning Policies or amendments are ratified if approved by the 73 county, cities and towns representing at least seventy percent of the county's population 74 and thirty percent of the jurisdictions. For ratification purposes, King County is the 75 jurisdiction representing the population in the unincorpomted areas of the county. 76 E. Within ten days after the date for response established by the clerk of the King 77 County council under subsectwn C. of this section, the clerk ofthe Kmg County council 78 shall notify the executive, as chair of the Growth Management Planning Council, of the 79 decision to ratify or not to ratify the Countywide Planning Policies or amendments. 80 SECTION 4. K.C.C. 20.10.010, K.C.C. 20.10.020, K.C.C. 20.10.030, K.C.C. 81 20.10.040, K.C,C. 20.10.050, K.C.C. 20.10.065, K.C.C. 20.10.075 and K.C.C. 20.10.076 82 are each hereby decod1fied. 4 12 Ordinance 17 486 83 SECTION 5 Ordinance 10450, Section 6, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.060 are 84 each hereby repealed. 85 Ordinance 17486 was introduced on 8/20/2012 and passed as amended by the Metropolitan King County Council on 12/3/2012, by the following vote: Yes: 9-Mr. Phillips, Mr. von Reichbauer, Mr. Gossett, Ms. Hague, Ms. Patterson, Ms. Lambert, Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Dunn and Mr. McDermott No: 0 Excused: 0 A1TEST: Anne Nons, Clerk of the Council KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON APPROVEDth1s l'5 dayo~'tf:e.2012. Dow Constantine, County Executive Attachments: A. 2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies, dated December 3, 2012 5 ;r ;r ':. ' ' J - d ~~ '' . . , (J.} -n ·:ft. (-:? w 0 13 -~ ~- .~· . ' -~ ' ·, \ --· ·' U1 King County Proposed No. 2012-0436.2 KING COUNTY Signature Report December 3, 2012 Ordinance 17487 Sponsors Phillips 1200 Kmg County CourtbOU$ll 51<> Th!fll Avenue ~cattle, WA 98(04 1 AN ORDINANCE adopting Growth Management Planning 2 Council Motion 12-5 and ratifying Motion 12-5 for 3 unincorporated King County. 4 STATEMENT OF FACTS: s 1. The Countywide Plannmg Policies ("CPPs") are adopted in accordance 6 with the state Growth Management Act, under 36 70A.210 RCW. 7 2. The Growth Management Planning Council ("GMPC") was formed in 8 1992 to guide the development of the CPPs. The GMPC is a 9 representative body of elected officials from King County, the city of 10 Seattle, the city of Bellevue and the Suburban Cities Association. 11 Repre~entatives of the special distncts serve as ex officio members. 12 3. The CPPs establish a framework for guidmg development in ali King 13 County jurisdictions. 14 4. The CPI's are deemed adopted when ratified by King County and the 15 requisite number of cities and satisfying the required population 16 percentage. 17 5. The GMPC recommends CPP amendments to the King County council 18 for consideration, possible revision and ratification. 19 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 1 107 108 Ordinance 17 487 20 SECTION 1. Findings: 21 A. On June 6, 2012, the Gro'Wth Management Planmng Council introduced 22 Motion 12-5 listing the proposed changes to the urban growth area then under 23 consideration by the King County Council and accepted public testimony regarding the 24 proposed changes. 25 B. On September 11, 2012, the Growth Management Planning Council approved 26 Motion 12-5 following additional public testimony regarding the proposed changes to the 27 urban growth area. 28 C. Attachment A to this ordinance incorporates Motion 12-5. 29 SECTION 2. The amendments to 2012 King County Planning Policies, as shown 2 Ord1nance 17487 30 in Attachment A to this ordinance, are hereby adopted and ratified on behalf ofthe 31 population of unincorporated King County. 32 Ordinance 17487 was introduced on 10/29/2012 and passed by the Metropolitan King County Council on 12/3/2012, by the following vote: ATTEST: Yes: 9-Mr. Phillips, Mr. von Reichbaucr, Mr. Gossett, Ms. Hague, Ms. Patterson, Ms. Lambert, Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Dunn and Mr. McDermott No:O Excused: 0 KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council APPROVED thts r~ day o~ 2012 Dow Constantme, County ExecutJve Attachments: A. Motion No. 12-5 3 109