The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About4058 Ordinance No . 4058 (Amending or Repealing Ordinances) CFN= 775 - Capital Improvement Program CFN= 961 - Capital Facilities Plan CFN= 1000 - School Impacts Fees/ECD Passed - 12/11/2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendment - 2012 School District Capital Facilities Plans The date ["Beginning July 1, 1998"] has led to confusion This date will be deleted from cover sheets of ordinance/resolution revision pages. This cover sheet will be deleted on electronic pages only, no other deletions or changes have been made to the document—6/21/2012 ORDINANCE NO. 'S AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the Kent Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities Element to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School Districts (CPA-2012-2). RECITALS A. The State of Washington Growth Management Act ("GMA") requires internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements and the plans from other jurisdictions. B. To assure that comprehensive plans remain relevant and up to date, the GMA allows amendments to the capital facilities element of comprehensive plans concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a city budget (RCW 36.70A.130(2)(a)(iv)). C. The City of Kent has established procedures for amending the Comprehensive Plan in Chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code, allowing amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the City budget and allowing the City Council to hold the public hearing instead of the Land Use and Planning Board. 1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2012 School Dist. Capital Facilities Plans D. The Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts have submitted proposed amendments to their Capital Facilities Plans, and the Highline School District submitted a Capital Facilities Plan, to be included in an amendment of the City's Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. E. After providing appropriate public notice, the City Council of the City of Kent considered the requested Comprehensive Plan amendment and conducted a public hearing on the same on October 16, 2012. F. On October 8, 2012, the City provided the required sixty (60) day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 to the State of Washington of the City's proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan and the sixty (60) day notice period has lapsed. G. On December 11, 2012, the City Council for the City of Kent approved the Capital Facilities Element amendment CPA-2012-2 to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached and incorporated by this reference. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE SECTION 1. - Amendment. The Kent Comprehensive Plan, and its Capital Facilities Element, are hereby amended to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached and incorporated by this reference (CPA-2012-2). 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2012 School Dist. Capital Facilities Plans SECTION 2. - Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the City Attorney, the City Clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering; or references to other local, state or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations. SECTION 3. - Severabilitv. If any one or more section, subsection, or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, that decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and that remaining portion shall maintain its full force and effect. SECTION 4. - Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its passage and publication, as provided by law. <:Zoe� r 1!)bKE, MAYOR ' ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, TY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: 1qw&(Z� TV BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY 3 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2012 School Dist. Capital Facilities Plans 061 PASSED: day of December, 2012. tL APPROVED: l day of December, 2012. PUBLISHED: day of December, 2012. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. X1,0.6� passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBgK, CITY CLERK P:\Civll\Ordinance\Compplanamend-Schooldlstcapltalfadlltlesplans-2013-2018_Ord Do" 4 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2012 School Dist. Capital Facilities Plans KW3dMdMSM 2012 - 2013 2017 - 201 IIAOL i New Panther lake Elementary School opened In Fall2009 Kent SchoofOUtrict No. 415 provides educational senwe to Roidents of Vnincorporated xjng County and wsidents of the Cities of xMt, Covington, RMton,.Au6urn a ack,iviawon4 q&pfe vaffey, andSea7ac, Washington ApriC 2012 MAN,'00A Kent School District No.415 12033 SE 256th Street Kent,Washington 98030-6643 (253) 373-7295 SIX - YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 -2013 - 2017 - 2018 KENT SCHOOL ti EC7 BOARD of DIRECTORS Bill Boyce Tim Clark Karen DeBruler Russ Hanscom Debbie Straus ADMINISTRATION Dr. Edward Lee Vargas—Superintendent Dr. Richard A. Stedry—Chief Business Officer Dr. Linda Del Giudice—Chief Accountability Officer Dr. Mem Rieger—Chief Student Achievement Officer Dr, Brent Jones—Chief Organizational Talent Officer Thuan Nguyen —Chief Information & Automated Operations Officer Chris Loftis—Executive Director, Communications &School Community Partnerships Kent School Dieftid Six Year Capital Families Plan Apnl 2012 sckw Rho* ENT aicr SIX - YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 - 2013 — 2017 - 2018 April 2012 For information on the Plan, please call the Finance & Planntng Department at (253) 373-7295 Capital Facilities Plan Contributing Staff Gwenn Escher-Derdowski Enrolrment&Planning Administrator Ralph Fortunato, CSBS— Director of Fiscal Services Debbi Smith, Business Services Department Fred Long,Supervisor of Facilities&Construction Kama Wilkerson, Facilities Department Don Walkup,Supervisor of Transportation Department Kent School District Stir-YW Capital Faefts Plan Apnl 2012 A&�— K11 $*d1R= Sk Tear Capital Facilities Plan 7a6re of Contents Section Page Number I Executive Summary 2 I I Six-Year Enrollment Projection & History 4 III District Standard of Service 8 I V Inventory, Capacity & Maps of Existing Schools 11 V Six-Year Planning& Construction Plan—Site Map 14 V I Relocatable Classrooms 17 V I I Projected Classroom Capacity 18 V I I I Finance Plan, Cost Basis and Impact Fee Schedules 23 I X Summary of Changes to Previous Plan 30 X Appendixes 31 Kent School Dfatdot Six-Year Capdal Fackm Plan Apnl 2012 I Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Kent School District (the "District") as the organization's facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual Plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2012 for the 2011-2012 school year. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not Intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and Renton and Included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. The first ordinance implementing impact fees for the unincorporated areas of Kent School District was effective September 15, 1993. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District; the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee-implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Plan has also been submitted to cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Program capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Relocatables in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (continued) Kent School DMW Six-You Ca0al FadUtles Plan April 2012 Page 2 I Executive Summary (continued) The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District standard of service and the existing inventory of permanent facilities. The District's program capacity of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the reduction of Gass size to meet the standard of service for Kent School District. Relocatables provide additional transitional capacity until permanent facilities are completed. Kent School District is the fourth largest district in the state. Enrollment is electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction ("OSPI") on Form P-223. Although funding apportionment is based on Annual Average Full Time Equivalent (AAFTE), enrollment on October 1 is a widely recognized "snapshot in time" that is used to report the District's enrollment for the year as reported to OSPI. P-223 FTE reports Kindergarten at .5 for all elementary schools except those five schools with full Day Kindergarten funded by State Apportionment. P-223 Reports include all students in Grades K — 12 and excludes Early Childhood Education (ECE] students and college-only Running Start students. The Board of Directors approved Full Day Kindergarten for all Elementary Schools for 2,011-13 and those projections are continued in future years. The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of transitional facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of reloaatables. A financing plan is included in Section V I I I which demonstrates the District's ability to implement this Plan Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated annually with changes in the fee schedules adjusted accordingly. Kent School District Sic-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2012 Page 3 11 Six -Yeat�tilrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years. (see rabk 2) The student generation factor, as defined,on the next page, is the basis for the growth projections from new developments. King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system. (see rabie 1) 8.18% of 24,899 King County live births in 2007 is projected for 2,036 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2012. This is a significant increase of 655 live births in King County over the previous year. Together with proportional growth from new construction, 8.18% of King County births is equivalent to the number of students projected to enter kindergarten in the district for the next six- year period.(sea Tabb 2) Full Day Kindergarten ("FDK") programs at all 28 elementary schools require an adjustment to the Kindergarten forecast for projecting FDK at 1.0 FTE for capital facilities planning. P-223 Reports will continue to include FDK students at 1.0 for five schools with FDK funded by state apportionment, and all other kindergarten students will continue to be reported at .50 FTE. (see rage 2Ai Early Childhood Education students (also identified as "ECE", "Preschool Special Education [SE] or handicapped students") are forecast and reported separately. Capacity is reserved to serve the ECE programs at seven elementary schools. The first grade population is traditionally 7 - 8% larger than the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District from private kindergartens. Cohort survival method uses historical enrollment data to forecast the number of students projected for the following year. Near term projections assume some growth from new developments to be offset by current local economic conditions. With notable exceptions, the expectation is that enrollment increases will occur District-wide in the long term District projections are based on historical growth patterns combined with continuing development of projects in the pipeline dependent on market/growth conditions. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine Impact to schools and monitor conditions to reflect adjustments in this assumption The six-year enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments In all jurisdictions may be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections {continued Kent School Dwhict Sec-Yea capdal Facillies Plan April 2012 Page 4 I I Six -Year Enrolknent-Projection (Comm) Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The Kent School District serves seven permitting jurisdictions- unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, and Auburn and smaller portions of the cities of SeaTac, Black Diamond, and Maple Valley. The west Lake Sawyer area of Kent School District is in the city of Black Diamond. STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor" is defined by King County code,as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last five years Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary .486 Middle School 130 Senior High .250 Total .866 Multi-Family Elementary .331 Middle School .067 Senior High .124 Total .522 The student generation factor is based on a survey of 2,023 single family dwelling units and 1,527 mutti-family dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy rates. Please refer to Appendix E on Page 36 of the Capital Facilities Plan for details of the Student Generation Factor survey. The actual number of students in those residential developments was determined using the District's Education Logistics (EDULOG) Transportation System which provides an accurate count of enrolled students in identifiable new development areas. Kent School Oistad Six-Year Capital FacAles Plan April 2012 Page 5 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.416 OCTOBER P 223 F T E(Full Time Equivalent)ENROLLMENT HISTORY ' Lfi z�Ve BMhe LB n 1!p$LB m 19Ba le n tB8]LB N10i Lend 1BBB land 1880 U M tBW LB H 18B"tea t9B8 l8 m faW Lam 1B9a LB H 1BBa LB n 1W7 LB k 1aBa la F i68a LB n 2009 La m 2001 LB H NO2 l8 H"OW La m 20p4 La In 2906 LBh MOa DaoDer FTEEAMNOWl 1990 1991 1992 1893 1994 1 1995 1998 1 1997 1 1998 1 1999 1 2000 20M 2002 2003 2D04 2006 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 ovC *the tmw2 19,023 1%998 20,449 21,T89 2R541 231M 23.002 23,188 22,355 22010 21517 21573 21,&6 22212 220W M417 21778 21883 22431 22874 22 No 24,244 InaaaN7Dwrw" 001 174 450 80D 1252 563 .102 1N -831 345 -123 -244 73 am -2m 480 708 ma 443 -1" 1,584 KWIVamoa 7 Wh%2 888% 949% 940% 907% 847% 854% 844% 838% 8227% 856% 825% 841% 8C6% 805% 833% 841% 822% 8.29% 847% 832% 813% 818% KUMergarten' 2-3 800 949 952 Na e65 9e7 971 972 925 942 900 907 873 894 917 943 895 906 788 756 749 767 State Apporhonmerd-funded Full Day Kindergarten""'I 0r2m6am lmwn 1:k 10 FIS a BronAll�w ow q 365 388 343 447 Grade 1 1,852 1,946 2,020 2.017 1,967 1,975 2,152 2.086 2054 1,989 2,008 1,936 1,922 1.951 1.954 1988 2003 1973 1920 1958 1992 1885 Glade 2 1,T73 1944 1998 2,040 1,937 Z011 1979 Z194 2095 Z078 Z015 Z047 1,938 1,968 1935 1981 1908 2045 1916 1902 1939 2014 Grade 3 /.824 I am 1,950 1.972 1,98E 1,969 2,025 2.068 2,208 2,111 2.098 2,040 2.055 1,976 2.020 1962 2026 2033 2081 1976 2000 1981 Grade 4 1793 1916 1,900 1,930 1.142 2,012 1,988 2.054 2,046 2222 2,086 2.165 2,068 2,072 2,057 202e 2015 2049 2DBC 2044 1954 2021 Grade 5 1702 1,855 1.911 1007 1.890 1,024 1,988 2,023 Z106 2.D37 2,251 2,109 2,149 2067 2102 2090 2051 2020 20" 20M 2082 1973 Grade 6 1629 1733 188E 1,651 1,015 1,806 1,924 2.036 Z046 2,119 2,058 2,253 2151 2.205 Z139 2164 2101 2ON 2031 2070 2130 2132 Grade 7 m4e a 1,824 1,720 1,012 1,216 1,946 1,926 IAA 1,982 2,083 2,081 2,208 2.127 2380 2200 2.243 22DO 2205 2130 2117 2115 2D92 2102 GnWe 8 " 11.545 1,620 1.724 1,799 1.882 1941 1,927 1,930 1,970 2,015 2,033 2,164 2079 2361 2.221 2293 2254 2184 2143 2168 2161 2108 Graft 9•J wHgh 1,408 1,612 1,689 1,718 /000 1,884 1963 1,931 1,925 2,102 2.208 2.246 2404 2,309 GAWD 9-Smor Walt 2,705 2767 2772 2560 2573 2467 2434 2468 Grade 10 1,460 1.480 1.60 1598 1,6911 1,755 1,951 1.977 1.953 2045 2113 Z064 2,039 2,207 2.124 2173 2212 2474 2245 2213 2233 2267 Grade 11 1,360 1,400 1409 1,537 1,529 1,606 1,681 1.797 1.849 1782 1770 1,836 1,823 1787 1907 1799 1681 1882 1866 1956 1949 1882 Grade 12 1202 1 256 1 290 1 340 1 368 1.430 1,465 1 607 1.632 1,537 1,432 1.440 1,476 1,466 1,446 1475 1451 1481 1549 1616 1673 1543 TAWE,,owrm, 2(X135 21.312 22,222 22,803 22,794 23,323 23,792 24.580 24,882 26,060 26238 26,344 25,354 25.358 25.770 25,009 25,11" 25.745 25,328 25778 25,621 25,500 y"d/F7E Inaaa7DeasoBa 918 1 178 On 502 40 52B 409 70 322 178 178 IN 9 4 412 39 65 419 w -W -167 31 CumWeMe YiWaw 916 2.9 31003 aIN5 3.575 4.104 4,594 4.911 5,883 6,841 6019 kl28 6,135 8,140 a,552 aW 6W 0627 0610 8580 8,403 6,372 ' F7E enmenent wa4alava bean mundatl a the main WIMe aeaba Moat KNtlaPrtwt WItl9aY aK aPatetl al S FTE pw Saw FwWNM U7nWa even dough ALL eMMMay od"s nwr hwa FWI Day lQndergwan pre9rama 210ia a atDer ht[Wa Wa B98a n Kip Canes 5 Yana War a WV~yew w Waited a71ea Cowly HaMM DeW KW Sawd DWXkA PwcWUP 0ase04n 40eM WAdw9aMn WCAMM 5 Yom later 38aen90n2908 wins1aMa9aleen MWr4a as reppR4dM10(aamu:8eatlo7Wp MSsgaaMs84aal 9AMdfa FWIOaylGM,g ten(FOp8oMe611eou96S1 Appa6onnent For FWI Day Kn10a9arlanMdlrr eGwda 8aaamnd hMlwlro OarYBwetlMFa4aMd51aa Capaleal9ranyanLayd8awdenlaorpala0a 5FrEmftR223Eraol Repmwhkn9enaMeaslatek Wr9 4 EaMYnaa np4r1W m Oa sou an Fam P.223 gamrWa Wea:eArotlm BrealMg ano mmludw Ealg ChMI4od @Mapatlm('EDE'd'B2'w BMh to 2 Fre819ap1 SpeMM Ftweatl4n)ane wgepemly FMnMng SaM1 ehdwta DcbWw2011P-223Haarl -26.elS&FWHewdw 1-27,397 fW FpBODlatl arltlea l(Mdagey6,Ea0YChildmod EdueMlon 8adN9aar4y RaBYrp BWl Mutlat1aa 10Haa6muM Mail&hod 1254k18m)(Ur CapSM Fa84ieS Plan Table 1 Apra 2012 Page 6 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 SIX-YEAR ENROLLMENT PROJECTION - Elementary Headcount!Secondary FTE Full Day Kindergarten at aN Elem LB m 2= t.B in 2007 LB In 2008 LB in 2000 LB in 2010 LB Est 2011 LB Est 2012 weruwt P R O d E C T 1 O N October 2011 .2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 201E King County Live Births' 24,244 24,899 25,222 25,057 24,514 24,600 24,700 ' Increase I Decrease 1,584 665 323 -165 -543 86 100 Kindergarten/Bjrth% 2 8 18% 7.92% 8.02% 818% 8 31% 8 29% 8 29% 213 Kindergarten FTE @ .5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 111 FD Kindergarten @ 1.0 1983 2,036 2,064 2,050 2,006 2,012 2,020 Grade 1 1888 2,029 2,095 2,124 2,109 2,064 2,070 Grade 2 2016 1,906 2,061 2,128 2,157 2,142 2,097 Grade 3 1983 2,058 1,958 2,116 2,185 2,214 2,199 Grade 4 2024 2,003 2,091 1,990 2,149 2,219 2,248 Grade 5 1974 2,041 2,033 2,122 2,020 2,180 2,251 Grade 6 2136 2,020 2,100 2,092 2,183 2,078 2,242 Grade 7 2102 2,104 2,004 2,083 2,075 2,165 2,061 Grade 8 2108 2,119 2,131 2,030 2,110 2,102 2,192 Grade 9 2468 2,418 2,440 2,454 2,338 2,430 2,421 Grade 10 2267 2,298 2,261 2,282 2,295 2,187 2,272 Grade 11 1882 1,911 1,947 1,916 1,934 1,945 1,854 Grade 12 1543 1,489 1522 1,550 1,526 1,540 1,548 Total FTE Enrollment 26,374 26,432 26,707 26,937 27,087 27,278 27,475 NM 21314 Pd0SWWFur Drr K4tleryrW, Yearly Increase/Decrease 3 $8e NOW 58 275 230 150 191 197 Yearly Increase/Decrease% 213/4 0 22% 1 04% 0 86% 0 56% 0 71% 0 72% Cumulative Increase with Fuji Day KindAdjusbnent Adj for FDK 811 1,086 1,316 1,466 1,657 1,854 Full Time E uivalent(FTE) 26,374 1 26,432 1 26,707 26,93E 1 27,08E 1 27,278 27,475 ' Kindergarten enrollment projecboj is based on Kent SD percentage or live baths in King County five years previous 2 Kindergarten projection is caleWated by using the Distncrs previous year percentage of King County births five years earlier compared to actual kxudh enrollment in the previous year (Excludes ECE-Early Childhood Education) 3 Kindergarten projection is at 1.0 for Full Day Kindergarten(FDK)at all 28 Elementary schools FDK funded at 5 schools by state apportionment&second 1/2 of day Ended by Federal&State Categorical Grants&Educational Programs Levy 4 Oct 2011 P223 FTE is 25,590&Headcount is 26,616 Full Headcount with ECE Preschool&Running Start students=27,397 G R O W T H P R O J E C T I O N S - Adjustments for current economic factors For facilities planning purposes,this sir-year enrollment projection anticipates conservative enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. Kent School Dr.M sir-Year Capital Facilities Pan Table 2 April 2012 Page 7 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County Code 21A.06 references a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the district which would best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District The District has Identified schools with significant special needs programs as "impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower class size at those facilities. Relocatables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (See Appendix A, s&C) The standard of service defined herein may continue to change In the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service. This process will affect various aspects of the District's standard of service and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students Class size for Kindergarten is planned for an average of 25 or fewer students. Class size for grades 1 - 3 is planned for an average of 25 or fewer students Class size for grades 4 -6 is planned for an average of 29 or fewer students. Program capacity for general education elementary classrooms is calculated at an average of 24 students per classroom because of fluctuations between primary and intermediate grade levels (i.e. thirdtfourth or fourthtfifth grade split classes, etc.). In 2011, all elementary schools meet the criteria required to provide full day kindergarten programs (FDK = Full Day Kindergarten) with the second half of the day funded by state apportionment or the local levy Five FDK Programs have state apportionment funding and the others will be funded through Basic Ed and Educational Programs and Operations Levy Students have scheduled time in a computer lab. Students may also be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (continued) Kent School District.Six-Year capital Facilities Flan April 2012 Page 8 III Current Kent School District"Standard of Service" (continued) Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs such as those designated as follows: English Language Learners (E L L) Inclusive Services/Tiered Intervention in SE Support Center Programs Early Childhood Education (ECE) (3-4 yr old students with disabilities) Developmental Kindergarten in SC Programs Integrated Programs &Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Self-contained Special Education Support Center Programs (SC) Adaptive Support Center for Mild, Moderate & Severe Disabilities (ASC-DD) Speech & Language Therapy & Programs for Hearing Impaired students Occupational & Physical Therapy Programs (OT/PT) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Tide I)—Federal Program Leaming Assisted Programs (LAP)— State Program District Remediation-Programs Education for Highly Capable Students (formerly "Gifted" Program) Some of the above special programs require specialized classroom space, as well as music and physical education classrooms, computer labs, etc ; thus, the permanent capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in these special programs and "pull-out' space must be allocated to serve these programs. Some newer buildings have been constructed to accommodate most of these programs; some older buildings have been modified, and in some circumstances, these modifications reduce the classroom capacity of the buildings. When programs change, program capacity is updated to reflect the change in program and capacity. Current Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service .outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings. Class size for grades 7—8 is planned for an average of 29 or fewer students. Class size for grades 9— 1215 planned for an average of 31 or fewer students Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (continued) Kent School Dm#W Six-Year capital Facidil(ee Plan Apni 2012 Page 9 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (conhnueco Identified secondary students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows: Computer, Multi-media&Technology Labs& Programs—(Advanced Academics—E2020) Technology Academy programs at Kent-Meridian High School &Mill Creek Middle School Science Programs & Labs — Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Oceanography, Astronomy, Meteorology, Marine Biology, General Science,etc. English Language Learners (E L L) Integrated Programs&Resource Rooms(for special remedial assistance) Basic Skills Programs Transition Outreach Program(TOP)for 18-21 year old Special Education students Child Development Preschool and Daycare Programs Music Programs—Band, Orchestra, Chorus, Jazz Band, etc Art Programs—Painting, Design, Drawing, Ceramics, Pottery, Photography, etc. Theater Arts—Drama, Stage Tech,etc Journalism and Yearbook Classes Highly Capable(Honors or Gifted) and Advanced Placement Programs International Baccalaureate("I B") Program Kent Phoenix Academy—Performance Learning Center, Gateway,Virtual High School & Kent Success program with evening classes designed for credit retrieval JROTC-Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps Variety of Career&Technical Education Programs/Activities(CTE-Vocational Education) Family&Consumer Science—Culinary Arts, Sewing, Careers w/Children/Educ, etc Health&Human Services—Sports Medicine, Sign Language, Cosmetology, etc Business Education — Word Processing, Accounting, Business Law & Math, Marketing, Economics,Web Design, DECA, FBLA(Future Business Leaders). Technical & Industry — Woodworking, Cabinet Making, -Building Trades, Metals, Automotive & Manufacturing Technology, Welding, Drafting, Drawing, CAD (Computer-aided Design), Electronics, Engineering&Design,Aviation,ASL, etc. Graphic&Commercial Arts, Media, Photography,Theater&Stage, Ag&Horticulture. Many of these programs and others require specialized classroom space which can reduce the permanent capacity of the school buildings. In addition, alternative home school assistance, choice and transition programs are provided for students in grades 3 - 12 at Kent Mountain View Academy. Space or Claisssroom UtilizgM As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 85% for secondary schools. Program capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level. Kent School District Six Year capdal Facilities Plan April 2012 Page 10 I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 27,509 students and transitional (relocatable) capacity to house 1,023. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section I 11. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity. (See Table 3 on Page 12) The ratio between permanent capacity and transitional capacity is 97% - 3% The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs, additional classrooms and new schools. Program capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes and capacity for the new Panther Lake Elementary School and building additions at the high schools Kent Mountain View Academy (formerly Kent Leaming Center and Grandview Elementary) serves Grades 3 — 12 with transition, choice and home school assistance programs. It is located in the former Grandview School in the western part of the District in the city of SeaTac. This school was originally designed as an elementary school and is included in the elementary capacity for this Plan. Kent Phoenix Academy is a non-traditional high school which opened in Fall 2007 in the renovated site and building that formerly served Sequoia Middle School. Kent Phoenix Academy has four special programs including the Performance Learning Center, Gateway, Virtual High School and Kent Success. Kent Success replaced the former Night Academy at Kent-Meridian High School and provides afternoon and evening classes for credit retrieval. Calculation of Elementary, Middle School and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B and C. A map of existing schools is included on Page 13. Kent School Dist t Six-Year Capdal Facilities Plan Apnl 2012 Page 11 VJWr SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 INVENTORY t>d CAPAC17Y of EXISTING SCHOOLS 2011-2012 Yaw SCHOOL 2e22d ABR ADDRESS Program Ca acdy' � Carnage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235-140th Avenue BE, Renton 98058 452 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 265DO Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042 380 Covington Elementary 1961 CO 17070 BE Wax Road, Covington 98042 504 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225-180th Avenue BE, Covington 98042 432 East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 476 Emerald Park 1999 EP 11800 BE 216th Street, Kent 98031 504 Fanwood Elementary 1969 FW 16600-148th Avenue BE, Renton 98058 408 George T Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 456 Glanndge Elementary 1998 GR 19409-120th Avenue BE,Renton 98058 456 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700-191st Place BE, Kent 98042 452 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641-144th Avenue BE, Kent 98042 504 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915-186th Avenue BE, Covington 98042 404 Kent Elementary 1999/11936 KE 24700-64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 452 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660-142nd Avenue BE, Kent 98042 510 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 BE 24M Street, Kent 98030 480 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710-108th Avenue BE,Kent 98030 475 Mendian Elementary 1939 ME 25621-140th Avenue BE, Kent 98042 524 Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98030 504 Neely-UBnen Elementary 19901 1%6 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 452 Panther Lake Elementary 20091193s PL 20831-108th Avenue BE, Kent 98031 552 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street Kent 98031 486 Pine Tree Bementary 1967 PT 27825-118th Avenue BE. Kent 98030 528 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030-162nd Place BE, Renton 98058 504 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135-228th Ave BE,Black Diamond 98010 504 Scenic Hill Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030 476 Soos Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 BE 218th Place, Kent 98031 408 Spnngbrook Elementary 19M SS 20035-t00th Avenue BE, Kent 98D31 452 Sunrise Elementary 1902 SR 22300-132nd Avenue BE, Kent 98042 504 Elementary TOTAL 13,240 Cedar Heights Middle Sdwol 1993 CH 19640 BE 272 Street,Covington 98042 895 Mattson Middle School 1981 MA 16400 BE 25131 Street Covington 98042 73T Meeker Noddle School 1970 MK 12600 BE 192nd Street Renton 98056 832 Mandian Middle Schod 1958 MM 23480-120th Avenue BE, Kent 98031 792 Mill Creek MS&Technology Academy 2 20D5/1952 MC 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 916 Northwood Middle School 1996 NW 17Do7 BE 184th Street, Renton 96068 926 Middle Scrod TOTAL 5,148 Kent-Mendtan HS&Tech Academy 1951 KM 10020 BE 256th Street Kent 98030 1,904 KenBake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 BE 300th Street,Kent 98042 1,957 Kentndge Senior High School 1968 KR 12430 SE 208M Street Kent 98031 2,277 Kentwood Senior High School 1981 KW 25800-164th Avenue BE, Covington 98042 2,159 Senior High TOTAL 8,297 Kent Mountain ViswAcademy 3 199711965 MV/LC 22420 Military Road, Des Moines 98198 410 Kent Phoenix Academy 4 2007119W PH 11000 SE 264th Street Kent 98030 414 DISTRICT TOTAL 27,509 i Changes to capacity reflect program changes and Secoriary Capacity updated for 2011-12 2 Mill Creek Middle School and Technology Academy replaced renovated Kent Junior High in 2005 3 Kent Mountain View Academy serves grades 3-12 The school was formerly known as Kent Learning Center&Grandview Elementary 4 Kent Phoenix Aced"is a non-tradilikin it high school which opened in Fall 2007 in lhre former Sequoia MS building Kent School District Sot veer Capnal Fed69es Plan Table 3 April 2D12 Page 12 x N Fdrwood EI''�ry Kent School District No. 415 8 BE Elementary Desire P.t �afr'nwg.cre.t Wdgeaotl Lake Serving residents of X ra«Rar, • Mddle School Unincorporated of Kent County .Meeker _ Middle "ko City of Renton Is or�ryk El.rtenMry •Lake Fd rrsorta City of Auburn • High Sch City of Sea Tac a SE208tASt La City of Covington 821 sr Pon/tie,Loki! Emeraid Park ngs Eleme tary El.ie ary City of Maple Valley En dft City of Black Diamond Elementary Mountain View 3 b1 Elff rk ienlaryy Academy d± • MOW= aely O'Bden +t 01,411dtlle School y Elementary Rod HIII w SE 2401h St Kent Elementary DONM ; W �b lertwmary� t School •teary Mattson ,SdL < Mldd o Scho)I Kent-Meddarl Sorkin l Crestwood Mgh 8M Elernerrtary SE 25M St — Elem ary 8cenle NW• • A�n�tlsfl«Won •Mertuntary �1 School C�arVraitlae� RPa Lake tllerrrerdary KM�t Lake U n Jenkins Academy Creek Cedar Heights • El*rn*rriary Middle School SE 272nd St HKt nenta Kent-Kangley Road • Homan• p1 •Covington Elanertlat Elementary Elementary rye h•• » Grass Lake Elementary < f� Elam Iary f V SE 00 ton's rqc, Lake Sawyer Lake High School S cho 28 Elementary Schools 6 Morton 6 Middle Schools sawyer woodo 4 Senior High Schools El.memary Kent Mountain View Academy(Grades 3-12) Kent PhoentK Academy(9-12) e V Six-Year Planning and ConsiftWtion Plan At the time of preparation of-this Plan in spring of 2012, the following projects are completed or in the planning phase in Kent School District: • Three new classrooms were added when the Auxiliary Gym project was completed for Kent-Meddian High School.Completion of the MAIN Gym project also provides additional classroom capacity at Kent-Meridian in 2011-12 • In February 2006, voters approved construction funding for replacement of Panther Lake Elementary School.A new site was acquired nearby and the"New" Panther Lake Elementary opened in Fall 2009 with a 28%increase in capacity. The district received authorization from OSPI for"Oki" Panther Lake Elementary School to be held in reserve for utilization in the event of flooding in the Kent Valley • Planning is In progress for a replacement school for Covington Elementary School The project is pending satisfactory financial resources to fund the project • In February 2006, voters also approved construction funding for a future Elementary School to accommodate new growth. • Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary school level.Future facility and site reeds are reflected in this Plan a Some funding for lease or purchase of additional portables may be provided by Impact fees as needed. Sites are based on need for additional capacity As a critical component of capital facilities planning, county and city planners and decision-makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety to and from school and bus stops as well as bus pull-outs and turn-arounds for school buses. Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future. (see Table 4 on Page 15&Site map on Page 16) Voter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is secured for purchase of additional sites but some may be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. 2006 voter approval of $106M bond issue for capital improvement included the construction funding for a new Elementary School, replacement of Panther Lake Elementary, and classroom additions to high schools. Some impact fees have been or will be applied to those projects. The Board will continue annual review of standard of service and those decisions will be reflected in the each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. Kent School D'ktnct Six-Year capital Facilities Plan Apnl 2012 Page 14 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Na 415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity Protected Protected sib for SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITI= LOCATION Type Status Complebon Program new Date Capacity Growth Apprnete AppMAnata man - Map ELEMENTARY (Numbers to identify future schools may not correlate with number of existing schools) Replacement 5 Replacement for Covington Elementary (F) SE 256th Street&154th Ave SE Elementary Planning 2015-16 600 16s/e Covington Elem- Cape t to be replaced 17070 SE Wax Road, Covington Elementary Planning 2015-16 -504 New Elementary*31 (Actual#29) (U) Local-wn TBD-To be determined z Elementary Planning 2016-17 600 100% Site for Elementary#31 (U-Unfunded), To be determined 2 Site Planning 2015-16 100% MIDDLE SCHOOL No now prolecls required at this time SENIOR HIGH No new protects required at this Ome Classroom Ccmpleted KeM-Mendlan HS-Classroom Additions (F) 10020 SE 2561h Street,Kent Additions Fall 2011 2011-12 53 100°% Additional TEMPORARY FACILITIES I Capacity Reloratables For placement as needed New Planning 2012+ 24 31 each 100% #onLand Uw Land Map ' OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Designstwn Type Jwisdictron 4 Covington area North (Near Mattson MS) BE 251 &184 SE, Covington 98042 Urban Elementary City of Covington 7 Covington area South (Scarsela) SE 290&156 SE, Kent 98042 Rural- Elementary King County 6 Covington area West (Haneaon-Wikstrom) SE 256&154 SE, Covington 98042 Urban Elementary City of Covington 3 Ham Lake area (Pollard) 16820 SE 240, Kent 98042 Rural Elementary King County 8 SE of Lake Morton area (West property) SE 332&204 SE, Kent 98042 Rural Secondary King County 2 Shady Lk area(Sowers,Bane,Drahota,Paroline) 17426 BE 192 Street, Renton 98058 Urban Elementary King County 1 So King Co Activity Center(former Nike site) SE 167&170 SE, Renton 98058 Rural TBD 2 King County 12 South Central site (Plemmons-Yeh-Wills) SE 286th St&124th Ave SE.Auburn 98092 Urban TBD 2 King County Notes: ' Unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future 2 TBD-To be determined-Some sites are acquired but placement, timing and/or 0of>figuiratlon have not been determined. 'Numbers correspond to sites on Site Bank Map on Page 16 Other Map site locations are parcels identified in Table 7 on Page 26 Kent school District six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 April 2012 Page 15 N €Fary Kent School District No. 415 A Site Bank SE V' a Rklgewood Noi Elementary > eme middle Sch ' Property Acquisitions £ MkYdp 3G1001 Dow. SElwnd S1 a � . �Necker Mladp SOnool m Gpnrltloa Lake Wurgs 8 194V Epm. .Y keg OE]e=rry Ele • H�SeHOOI Lake Younpa SE 208M St dgi S 212M St Ih®r LO• Emerald Park V nary Eementary a c 1p n=Lake g Repacemeni Soos Crt i Eementary Q €prrenrary Kent PE�n OrrcitO dMaunt a AaademyVlew k b� C9 m i IJealy O'Brpn c' emendia" F8 Ele nentowe .T� EW He SE 2 Middle Sendai SE 24 m St y Eprtena Elerrenttaary�nt ICb SSkmoO1Kent- Canfel m M a O�'PV Merricilan Eprren ry Marlin+ £ MW68oh iesh ood S SafHiO�ol Bemen" $_ t pnentary C SE 266th St icHMO wjn •*rsn r �ntwaoPlpe lake Scenen%;ry lgh San001 Cedar Wlpy Fbmentary $ Epnentdry Kenf Lake Merkilan Jenkins Academy MIE®nnlufrf Creek Cedar Helghis Elementary Middle School SE 272 nd St �acaw pe y 0 K ptl kangleY load Y m Horlmn0 ` �Covkloton *Pins Ir9e Elementary ,C Eien n ry Etemantaryg Glad LOKa a2t.at ,Ele intaryi c4,GmNn9t ryo �Po• SE 304M Sheaf Kenflake swyer D Hlgh School 1 SOwyef racy ds LakeMarian Elementary QN Morton q w SE 3361h St VI Relocatable Classrooms For the purpose of clarification, the term "portables" and the more descriptively accurate term, "relocatables" are used interchangeably in this Plan. The Plan also references use of portables or relocatables as interim or transitional capacity and feoilities. Currently, the District utilizes relocatables to house students in excess of permanent capacity, for program purposes at some school locations, and some for other purposes. (See Appendices a e C of Based on enrollment projections, implementation of full day kindergarten programs, program capacity and the need for additional permanent capacity, the District anticipates the need to purchase some additional relocatables during the next six-year period. During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District's relocatables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful fife of some of the relocatables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these relocatables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables, or relocatables, may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the time of demand for Increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Relocatables currently in the District's inventory are continually evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced. Quality concerns will be among those addressed by review of capital facilities needs for the next bond issue. The Plan projects that the District will use relocatables to accommodate Interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of relocatables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between relocatables, emerging technologies and educational restructuring will continue to be examined. Kent School Distria Six Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2012 Page 17 V I I Projected Six Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section IV, the program capacity study is periodically updated-for changes in special programs and reflects class size fluctuations, grade level splits, etc. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3 on Page 13, the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts. (See Tables 5&5 A-&Con pages 19-22) Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment "snapshot in time" to report enrolment for the year. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) student enrollment for October 2011 was 25,590 08 Kindergarten students are reported at .5 although all schools provide full day kindergarten ("FDK") with alternative funding for the second half of the day. State Apportionment-funded Full Day Kindergarten programs report and project Kindergarten students at 1.00 FTE at qualifying FDK schools. The P-223 FTE Report excludes Early Childhood Education ("ECE" preschool) students and College-only Running Start students. (see Tables 5&5 A-B-c on pages 19-22) In October there were 654 students in 111h and 12th grade participating in the Running Start program at 10-21 different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. 323 of these students attended classes only at the college ("college-only")and are excluded from FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District has the highest Running Start program participation in the state. Kent School District continues to be the fourth largest district in the state of Washington. P-223 Headcount for October 2011 was 26,616 with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECE and college-only Running Start students. A full headcount of all students enrolled in October 2011 totals 27,397 which includes ECE and college-only Running Start students. Based on the enrollment forecasts, permanent facility inventory and capacity, current standard of service, relocatable capacity, and future planned additional classroom space, the District anticipates having sufficient capacity to house students over the next six years. (See Table 5 and Tables 5 A-B-C on Pages 19-221 This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There may be a need for additional relocatables and/or new schools to accommodate growth within the District. New schools may be designed to accommodate placement of future relocatables. Boundary changes, limited and costly movement of relocatables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and underutilization of facilities in different parts of the District. Kent School District Six Y*r Capital Faoif n Plan April 2012 Page 18 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.416 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT SCHOOL YEAR 2011-2012 2012-2013 1 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016.2017 2017-2018 Actual P R O J E C T E D Permanent Program Capacity ' 27,456 27,509 27,509 27,509 27,509 27,605 28,205 Changes to Permanent Capacity ' Kent-Meridian HS-2011-12 Additions(F)2 53 Construction completed-2 Classrooms added at KM Replacement school with projected Increase In capacity, Covington Elementary 3 (Funded) 600 To Replace current Covington Elementary capacity -504 New Elementary 11131 tadveur291 (unfunded) 600 Permanent Program Capacity subtotal 27,509 27,509 27,509 27,509 27,605 28,205 28,205 Intenm Relocatable Capacity Elementary Rabcatable Capacity Required 360 456 768 984 1080 576 792 Middle school Rebcambb capadry Required 417 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Senor High Retocatable Capacity Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Taft(Relocatable Capacity Required 1 t s 360 456 768 984 1,080 576 792 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 27,869 27,965 28,277 1 28,493 28,685 1 28,781 1 28,997 rnmms.e "An Ad usted for FULL Day Kindergarten Headcount TOTAL ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION a 26,374 26,432 1 26,707 26,937 1 27,087 1 27,278 27,475 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 7 1 495 1,533 1,570 1,556 1,598 1,503 1,522 ' Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes 2 Construction completed for classroom additions at Kent-Mendian HS for 2011-12 school year 3 Replacement school for Covington Elementary vnll increase capacity and will be built on a different existing urban site 4 In Fall 2004,9th grade moved to the high schools which increased capacity available at Middle School 7th-8th grade levels 5 Enrollment f Projections adjusted for FULL Day Kindergarten at ALL Elementary Schools starting in 2011-12. s 2011-2012 total classroom relocatable opacity is 1,023. 7 School capacity meets concurrency requirements and no impact fees are proposed for secondary schools Kent School Mulct Six-Year Capital Fates Plan Table 6 April 2012 Page 19 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.416 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY - Grades K - 6 SCHOOL YEAR 2011-2012 2012 2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 1 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 ActW P R O J E C T E D Elementary Permanent Capacilyk t 1 13,240 13,654 13,654 13,654 13,654 13,750 14,350 Kent Mountain View Academy 2 414 Changes to Elementary Capacity Replacement school with projected increase in capaW Covington Elementary 4 (Funded) 600 Wig replace current Covington Elementary capacity -504 New Elementary At 31 5 (Unfunded) 600 Subtotal 13,654 13,654 13,654 13,654 13,750 14,350 14,350 Relocatable Capacity Required' 360 456 768 984 1080 576 792 TOTAL CAPACITY 112 14,014 14110 14,422 14,638 14,830 14,926 15,142 + **' Adjusted for FULL Day Kindergarten Headcount ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION s 14 004 14,093 14,402 14,622 14,809 14,909 15,127 SURPLUS DEFICIT CAPACITY 10 17 20 16 21 17 15 Number of Relocatables Required 15 19 32 41 45 24 33 45 Classroom Reiocatables requited in 2015-% Some additional Relocatables used for program purposes ' Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes 2 Kent Mountain View Academy is a special program at the former Grandview School serving students in Grades 3-12 The school building(formerly Kent Learning Center&Grandview Elem)was designed as an elementary school 3 Enrollment or Projections reflect FULL Day Kindergarten @ 1.0$exclude ECE Preschoolers ALL Elementary Schools have FULL Day Khidergarten starting In 2011.12. 4 Replacement school for Covington Elementary will increase capacity and is planned for a different existing urban site 5 Site selection and construction timing for Elementary#31 is pending review of location and capacity needs Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 6 A April 2012 Page 20 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No, 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY - MIDDLE SCHOOL - Grades 7 - S SCHOOL YEAR 2011-2012 2012-2013 1 2013-2014 2014-2015 1 2015-2016 2016-2017 1 2017-2018 Actual P R O J E C T E D Middle School Permanent CaMdy' 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 Changes to Middle School Cap of 1 4 Mill Creek MS 8 Technology Academy Phase 2 of Renovation completed (No new capacity added in renovation) Subtotal 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 Relocatable Capacity Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 'a s 5,148 51148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 2 4,210 4,223 4,135 4,113 4,185 4,267 4,253 SURPLUS(DEFICI CAPACITY4 938 925 1,013 1,035 963 881 895 Number of Relocatables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Classroom Relocatables required at middle schools at this time Some Relocatables used for classroom and program purposes ' Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes 2 Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment with Headcount Projections 3 Surplus Capacity due to grade level reconfiguration-All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004 4 Middle School capacity meets concurrency requirements and no impact fees are collected for middle schools. Kent School Distrait Svc-Year Cap&st1*adh tes Plan Table 5 B April 2012 Page 21 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH - Grades. 9 - 12 SCHOOL YEAR 2011 2012 2012-2 113 1 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 Actual P R O J E C T E D Senior High Permanent Capacity 1 8,654 8,707 8,707 8,707 8,707 8,707 8,707 Includes Kent Phoenix Academy 2 Changes to High School Capacity Kent Meridian HS-2011-12 Additions(F) 2 Classrooms added (®iisx u4i zwm) 53 subtotal 8,707 8,707 8,707 8,707 8,707 8,707 8,707 I Relocatable Capacity Required 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 6,707 8,707 8,707 8,707 8,707 8,707 8,707 FTE ENROLLMENT I PROJECTION 3 8,160 8116 8,170 8,202 8,093 8,102 8,095 SURPLUS(DEFICIT)CAPACITY 547 591 537 505 614 605 612 Number of Relocatables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Classroom Relocatables required at this lime.Some Relocntables used for classroom and program purposes 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes Z Kent Phoenix Academy opened in Fall 2007 serving grades 9- 12 with four special programs 3 FTE=Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or projections,excluding College only Running Start students ` High School capacity mr isaft concurrency requirements and no impact fees are collected for high schools Kent School District Six-Year CapUt Flies Plan Table 5 C April 2011 Page 22 V I I I Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2012 - 2013 through 2017 - 2018 The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and Impact fees. The plan is based on voter approval of future bond issues, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. In February 2002, voters approved a $69.5 million bond Issue for capital construction and improvements. The bond issue partially funded building additions at three high schools which coincided with moving 9th grade students from junior high to senior high schools in September 2004. The District received some State Funding Assistance (formerly known as 'state matching funds°) and has utilized impact fees for the senior high additions. In February 2006, voters approved a $106 million bond issue that included funds for replacement of Panther Lake Elementary School with increased capacity, as well as construction of a new Elementary School to accommodate growth. The new Panther Lake Elementary School replaced the previous Panther Lake Elementary in Fall of 2009. The bond issue also funded Phase 11 of the renovation for Mill Creek Middle School and renovation of Sequoia Middle School for reconfiguration as a non-traditional high school, Kent Phoenix Academy,which.opened in September 2007. 2006 construction funding approval also provided for additional classrooms at Kentlake High School and two projects at Kent-Meridian High School The projects at Kent- Meridian High School provide additional capacity with several new classrooms and gymnasium space. The projects at K-M are completed and the new Main Gym added capacity for two more PE classrooms. Some impact fees have been utilized for the new construction that increased capacity. The district has designated $16 million of the 2006 bond authorization for construction of an additional elementary school, currently scheduled for completion in the fall of 2015. The Finance Plan includes a few new relocatables to provide additional capacity and some may be funded from impact fees. Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary level and unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future and reported in annual updates of the Capital Facilities Plan. For the Six-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School Distrfct Facilities Department. Please see pages 25-26 for a summary of the cost basis. Kent School Distant Sup-Fear Capital,Fac a Plen April 2012 Page 23 KENT SCHOOL. DISTRICT No.415 SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN ' Become Unsecumtl 1111paa SCHOOL FACILITIES 2012 2013 2014 2016 2016 2017 TOTAL Local 8 State Stara 2 W Loral a Fees a Eetmeed Esdamea PERMANENT FACILITIES Compton Elementary Replacemem F - 331,840,000 $31.840,000 $16,000.000 $10,745.000 $5.096,000 ENmalOary N 31 Vzk*$29)1-2-3 22 U S33,400,000 $33.400.000 $26,460.000 $6440,000 Elementary Site 3 $8000,000 $8,000.000 36,0001000 NO Secondwy Schwa Pro"at the Iane TEMPORARY FACLITES F Ada8lonsl RYWcalesMes J-a U $264.000 $277,000 S290A00 $831,000 $831000 2 atonYeNe 2rabcar/Wes 2rtleeoMMW OTHER NIA Totals Me=ON $277.000 329000g $37840.000 $33,400,000 50 $72.071,000 $18000.000 537,205,000 $18,866.000 F - Funded U • UnhaWed NOTES. ' Based on es8mates of actual or tubas conabuction costs from FacillBas Depeamwn.(Sae Page 251a Coat Basis Summary) 2 The DmW artbopabc aceamg some State Funding Cwwhcban Assetsnw(bonarry known aa*matching funds')for some Molects 2 Fsaft needs are pending larlew Some of these pip"may be funded rat sound left I Cost of ReloCatabl6a based on Current Wet and adjusted tot Inflation for 1uNre yeaa 'Feas In this column are based on amount of lees collected to date and sstimated fees on Inure units Kant Sawa District Sir-Yaw capital Facilities Plan Table 6 Aunt 2012 Page 24 V I I I Finance Plan - Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last elementary school, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost of the next elementary school. Elementary School Cost Projected Cost Millennium Elementary#30 Opened in 2000 $12,182,768 Cost of Panther Lake Elementary Replacement (Opened in Fall 2009) $26,700,000 Projected cost- Covington,Elementary Replacement (Projected to open in 2015) $31,840,000 Projected cost of Elementary#31 in 2016 $33,400,000 Average cost of Covington Elementary Replacement & Elementary #31 $32,62%000 Construction cost of high school addition: Senior High School Additions Projected Cost Total Kent-Mendian HS-2011-12 Addition#2 $1,500,000 Classroom Additions only Construction cost of new HS capacity Completed Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years, Please see Table 7 on page 27 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. District Adjustment The impact fee calculations on pages 28 and 29 include a "District Adjustment" to reduce the fees calculated by the impact fee formulas. Based on current economic conditions, the District has adjusted the impact fees to keep the same rates as those currently in place and made no adjustment for increase In the Consumer Price Index. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Fac"ea Plan Apnl 2012 Page 26 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.416 Site Acquisitions 8n Costs Average of Sitars Purchased or Built on within last 15 Years Type& Year Open 7 #on Map School / Site Pultlleaad Loratron Acreage Coat Av Cosft- Total Avers Coet7Acre Elementary 131 Urban Panther Lake Elementary Repaecertl®M Site 2008 102a0 SE216 St,Kara WWI 9AG $4,485A13 $477,129 51 Urban Elementary Site(Hallesond Wakatrom) 2OD4 15435 SE 256 St,Cowgoon 98042 1000 $1,093,910 $109,391 Elementary Site Subtotal 1940 $5,578,923 $287,573 Elem site average MMde School Urban Nanhwood Middle School 1996 17007 SE 184 St, Renton 98M 2442 $656,138 $26,828 10/Urban Pun creek MS(scan AH)y Wilson,St assemblage 2002 411.432 Notation Si.Kam 98= 123 $844,866 $686,883 121 Urban so Centre)site-unmoorp sac(4eannons,Yen,wme) 1999 E W 124 SE bhv 288.288 PI(UKC) 3936 $1,936,020 $49,186 Middle School Sea Subtota( 6501 $3,436,024 $62,864 anode Schl SSa Avg Somor High 11 r urban K-M High School Addition(Kant 6 8 arm Scam) 2a02#2= toom SE 256m Street 631 $3.310.000 $524,564 Senor mgn Kenflake High School (Komboa Mom) 1197 21401 SE 300 St,Kent 981542 4000 $537.534 $13,438 8/urban KaMwoodSrHiAdddlon (Sandtm) 1s" IOWSE256thShIM 183 $302,117 $78,882 Senior Hlgh so Subtotal 5014 $4,149,651 $82,761 Sr Hi 9rte Amara a Mote An near altos ware PurChmed PM lb edopson 01 Urban Gn7a8i Alea. Nu irAMS correspond to locations on Site Bank 8 mbcm,Map on Pap 17 Properties pirchmad pit,to 1996 1 i Rural So Wrg County Acth*Carder(Wks me)praMaeed prwoo 1998. 41 Urban Site-Cavrnglon arse North(So of Meaacn MS) 1984 Total Acreage 8 Cosa Total Average Cost/Acre 3/Rural See-Ham Lake Gael(Pollard) 1992 13455 $13,164,698 $97.842 71 Rural Site-Smth of Covingtm(Scaradla) 1903 8/Rural Sna-SE Cf Lake Maroon area (fit property) 1903 2/Urban Ste-Shady lake(SOMera Nooroo-0retgtaParmno) 1905 91 Urban Old Kent Elementary replaced And pRagy leased aft fleet Sclwa District So-Year cap,tal FwAtas Pran Table 7 April 2012 Page 26 kENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR XSTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors-Single Fancily Student Generation Factors-Multi-Family Elementary (Grades K-6) 0.486 Elementary' 0 331 Middle School (Grades 7-8) 0.130 Middle School 0 067 Senior High (Grades 9- 12) 0.260 Senior High 0 124 Total 0 866 Total 0 522 Projected Increased Student Capacity OSPI-Square Footage per Student Elementary 600 Elementary 90 Middle School 0 Middle School 117 Senior High Addition 0 Senior High 130 Special Education 144 Required Site Acreage per Facility Elementary (required) 11 Average Site Cost!Acre Middle School (required) 21 Elementary $287,573 Senior High (required) 32 Middle School $0 Senior High $0 New Facility Construction Cost Elementary' $32,620,000 Temporary Facility Capacity 8r Cost Middle School $0 Elementary @ 24 $132,000 Senior High ` T$0 Middle School @ 29 $0 See cost basis on Pg 25 Senior High @ 31 $0 Temporary Facility Square Footage State Funding Assistance Credit ftmerty stow m &..) Elementary 70,892 District Funding Assistance Percentage 56 65% Middle School 16,376 Senior High 22,064 Total 3% 109,332 Construction Cost Allowance CCA-cost/sq.Ft. Area Cost Allowance(Effective July 11) $188 55 Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary (Includes KMVA) 1,470,543 Middle School 667,829 District Average Assessed Value Senior High 1,111,036 Single Family Residence $249,981 Total 97% 3,249,408 Total Facilities Square Footage District Average Assessed Value Elementary 1,541,435 Multi-Fammly Residence $95,379 Middle School 667,829 Apartments 71%Condos 29% Senior High 1,133,100 Total 3 Bond Levy Tax Ratel$1,000 Current /$1,000 Tax Rate(1 14641) $1 75 Developer Provided Sites/Facilities Value 0 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Dwelling Units 0 Current Bond Interest Rate 3.84% Kent School District Six-Year CapW Facullnls Plan April 2012 Page 27 N4 __ KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cast per Single Family Residence Formula ((Acres x Cost per Acre)J Facility Capacity)x Student Generation Factor itequked Site Acreage I Average Site CosVAcre I Facility Capacty Student Factor A 1 (Elementary) 11 $287,573 600 0 486 $2,562 28 A 2 (Middle School) 21 $0 1,065 0 130 $0 A 3 (Senior High) 32 $0 1,000 0 250 $0 0 866 A $2,562 28 Permanent Facility Constn ction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula- ((Facility Cost i F )x Student Factor)x(Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratty B 1 (Elementary) $32.620,000 600 0 486 097 $25,629 53 B 2 (Middle School) $0 900 0 130 097 $0 B 3 (Senior High) $0 53 0 250 097 $0 0 866 B $25,629 53 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence Formula ((Facility Cost J Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Tempos /Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Fealty Capecay Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $132,000 24 0 486 003 $80 19 C 2 (Middle School) $0 29 0.130 003 s0 C 3 (Senior High) $0 31 0 250 0,03 $0 0 866 C b $80 19 State Funding Assistance Credit per Single Family Residence (formerly'State Match") Formula Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance% x Student Factor Area CoatAllaaanpe I SPI Sq Ft !Student I Equalization% Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $188 55 90 05665 0 486 $4,672 03 D 2 (Middle School) $188 55 117 0 0 130 $0 D 3 (Senior High) $188 55 130 0 0250 $0 D b $4,672 03 Tax Credit per Single Fancily Rasiderrce Average SF Residential Assessed Value $249,981 Current Capital Levy Rate J$1,000 $1 75 Current Bond interest Rate 3 84% Years Amortized (10 Years) 10 TC a $3,569 34 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility/Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $2,562.28 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $25,629 53 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $00 19 Subtotal $28,272 00 D = State Match Credit per Residence $4,672 03 TC=Tax Credit per Residence $3,569.34 Subtotal $8,241 37 TOM Unfunded Need $20,030 63 50%Developer Fee Obligation $10,015 FC=Facility Credit(if applicable) 0 District Adjustment (See Page 26 for explanation) ($4,529) Not Fee Obligation per Residence-Single Family $5,486 Kent School District Six-Year Capful Facilities Plan April 2012 Page 28 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT PEE CALCULATION for MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per MultilRwity Residence Unit Formula, ((Acres x Cost per Ave)I f Ca )x Student Generation Favor Requked She Acreage A Site CostAcie FacilryCepacdy, Student Factor A 1 (Elementary) 11 $287,573 500 0 331 $2,09411 A 2 (Middle School) 21 $0 1,065 0 067 $0 A 3 (Senior High) 32 $0 1,000 0 124 $0 0 522 A $2,094 11 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Mult)famiy,Residence Unit Formula ((Facility Cost/Facility Capaci x Student Factor x(Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) Conavuctlon Cost Fact Capacy SWdem Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary) $32,620,000 600 0 331 097 $17,455 51 B 2 (Middle School) $0 900 0 067 097 $0 8 3 (Senior High) do 53 0124 097 $0 0 522 B b $17,455 51 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula ((Facility Cost]Facility Ca ' ,x:Student Factor)x(Temporary I Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $132 000 24 0 331 003 $54 62 C 2 (Middle School) $0 29 0 067 003 $0 C 3 (Senior High) $0 31 0 124 003 $0 0 522 C b $54 62 State Funding Assistance Credit per MWII-Famiy Residence (formerly"State Match") Formula Area Cost Allomnoe x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance% x Student Factor Area Cost AYaeaoce SPI Sq Ft I Student I Equalization% I Student Fador D 1 (Elementary) $188 55 90 0 5665 0 331 $3,181 98 D 2 (Middle School) $188 55 117 0 0 067 $0 D 3 (Senior High) $188 55 130 0 0 124 $0 D $3,181 98 Tax Credit per MuW-Family Residence Urtit Average MF ResxW!af Assessed Value $95.379 Current Capital Levy Rate 1$1,000 $1 75 Current Bond Interest Rate 3 84% Years Amortized (10Yews) 10 TC $1,36186 Developer Provided Facility Credit facility 1 Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC b 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per Muni-Family Unit $2,094 11 B = Permanent FactNty Cost per MF Unit $17,455 51 C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $54 62 Subtotal $19,604 23 D = State Match Credit per MF Unit $3,181 98 TC=Tax Credit per MF Unit $1,361 86 Subtotal $4,543 84 Total Unfunded Need $15,060 39 50%Developer Fee Obligation $7,530 FC-Facility Credit(it applicable) 0 District Adluatmerit (Sae Peye 26 for e0ana6on) ($4� ,152) Net Fee ObAgatsxt per Residential Unit-Multbfamlly $3,378 Kent School District Six-Year Capital,Facilities Plan April 2012 Page 29 IX Sumer of Changes to-April 2011 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the 'Tjan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the April 2011 Plan are summarized here New Panther Lake Elementary School replaced "Old" Panther Lake Elementary and opened in Fall 2009. "Old" Panther Lake Elementary is still being held in reserve for utilization in the event of flood emergency in the Kent Valley. Future projects include potential replacement and expansion of Covington Elementary, and future new Elementary School #31 (actual #29). Project that increased capacity at Kent-Meridian HS was completed and removed from Finance Plan & Fee Charts Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in class size as well as program changes. Changes in relocatables or transitional capacity reflect use, lease or purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement between facilities. The student enrollment forecast is updated annually. All Elementary schools now have Full Day Kindergarten so previous Kindergarten Chart (Table 2A on page 8) was deleted from the CFP.-Six-year Kindergarten projections were previously modified to meet the requirements for Full Day Kindergarten programs at all Elementary schools The district expects to receive some State Funding Assistance (formerly called "state matching funds') for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded site and facility needs will be reviewed in the future Based on current economic conditions, the District Adjustment results in no change to the current impact fees. Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors include ITEM Graderrype FROM TO Comments Student Generation Factor Elam 0 445 0 486 Single Family(SF) Ms 0118 0130 SH 0.245 0 250 Total 0 808 0 866 + 58 Student Generation Factor Elam 0 296 0 331 Multi-Family(MF) Ms 0 075 0 067 SH 0 111 0 124 Total 0 482 0 522 + 40 State Funding Assistance Ratios('ftw mew) 56 55% 56 65% Per OSPI Websde Area Cost Alktwance(ronner etackh Index) $18017 $188 55 Per OSPi Websde Average Assessed Valuation(AV) SF $268,279 $249,981 Per Puget Sound ESD AV-Average of Condominiums$Apts MF $99.888 $95,379 Per Puget Sound ESD Debt Service Capital Levy Rate/$1000 $1 84 $1 75 Per King Co Assessor Report General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 4 91% 3 84% Market Rate Impact Fee-Single Family SF $5,486 $5,486 No Change to Impact Fee Impact Fee-Mufti-Family MF $3,378 $3,378 No Change to Impact Fee Kent School District Six-Yeed Capital Fa A%n Plan April 2012 Page 30 X Appendixes Appendix A: Calculations of Capacities for Elementary Schools Appendix B: Calculations of Capacities for Middle Schools Appendix C: Calculations of Capacities for Senior High Schools Appendix D: Use of Relocatables Appendix E: Student Generation Factor Survey Kent School Distnct Six-Year Capgel Facftm Plan Apnl 2012 Page 31 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No,415 STANDARD of SERVICE • PROGRAM CAPACITY - INVENTORY of RELOCATABLES - FTE and HEADCOUNT ENROLLMENT KSD Numwcf I SMMIpa Cap 26Eloo '$Paced 1 2011-2012 1 Pla9le113 CMAAma1n Rekxaabe 10Ftf101I 10/1/2011 F ELEMENTARY aa>HphC4 C 6l -Propmm Piagrem Use UN Capetlly P223 F7E3 P223 Hdcounl D SCHOOL Claaamama 5r 24 alar1y7' CK Capacity' Rww& AW RMwIWIw 21 n4 aaM- EnmlAaem Enroltriem K2 e�¢{ak•Har40%elle 0ECE6K 5a10 0ECESK 10 Caldape Crest CC 18 432 5 20 462 1 0 0 40785 444 F CadUValley C" 15 380 a 20 380 2 a 0 27450 296 F C-Wgt- cote 20 480 5 24 509 1 0 0 43420 466 F Crniwood CW 18 432 4 0 432 4 1 24 46517 408 F Ent IWI EN 18 432 7 14 476 3 3 72 50103 542 F EmarWd Park EP 21 504 2 0 504 2 0 0 47600 505 s Fainewd FWN 17 400 3 0 408 3 0 0 40962 446 F CmeoWT DaniW Ekan DE 16 432 5 24 486 1 0 a 44112 442 SA G%Aodpe GR 19 458 4 0 4E6 2 0 0 463fo 494 F Grm Lake CM 16 432 4 20 462 1 0 a 39&53 414 F HoruLn HE 21 504 2 0 504 3 0 0 46300 Soo F Jenkm Greek JG 15 390 7 dt 404 3 1 24 30400 326 F Keen EkKnent" KEM 18 432 3 20 452 2 4 99 58600 595 SA Lake Yompc LYM 21 504 7 20 510 a 0 0 42700 448 1- Mom SmWn ME 19 450 3 24 480 1 1 24 53400 575 r Mndoa Ridge We 17 408 a 58 476 0 4 98 493 16 496 SA k%ddum Elementary MEAL 21 504 3 20 624 3 2 48 55302 583 F Wleradum Elementary ML 20 400 3 24 5D4 0 0 0 50305 541 F Neary-019tew NO 1a 304 5 66 452 7 5 120 05082 714 F Panther Lake(NeWj PL 15 360 3 36 $42 4 0 0 518.60 504 F Palk Omhwd PO 18 432 7 54 460 2 0 0 44200 442 SA Plea Tau PTA1 21 504 4 24 526 3 0 0 47200 Soo F Rnlpaamd RVAr 21 504 i 0 504 1 2 40 53053 565 F Sawyer Woods SIN 21 804 2 0 504 0 0 D 467 D0 400 F Scenic Hill _ SH 17 408 a Be 47S 4 3 72 80400 604 F Sacs Cmak BC/a 17 408 4 a 405 3 0 0 317 50 342 SA Spegbmok SS 17 A06 6 44 452 2 0 0 46760 511 F smr;se 3Rm 21 504 2 0 504 3 0 0 51750 547 F Kan Mtr.Ya.A y MV 14 356 3 60 410 0 0 0 10500 105 0 EWnen"TOTAL"' 532 M788 121 725 13650 a1 26 624 13 219 02 14,004 'EWnMltarydnMoom capwly ie bwd m avempe od 24.20.22 in K-3 a 28 ta Gmdae4.6 alduCn aduatrlame rdrdew Ate mdmdon Dr spade)p ogam chaRM& 2 Ked School UWW$landed of Suvsla lannea Boma mama furpu84KA pmpams al 20 Total.10 Standard+1 CWWUMr lab t 1 Mum+1 ELL+1 hiapmtetl Pmpmm clauroom - s All etamanfary 8dgde lava Fla 0qp dOnd9rg0fdN1-5 FOK 480prarfgXa Stata4laidAtl FTE nMcrts IOad®58 SF-FDK @ 1 0-P223 Hmdeaura q)"KlWwgwL-n C i 0 'Ekstwn4vyacnads have 100%ago uaagfianmevMi no p*wi nYaa for pan-tlnm age of cMnrocrne Count aoOde ECE Pmsdlmlets 8 space Is maemetl far ECE clwsmoma Kem Sdool 010ld St-Year CaPAW F*dU§n Penn APPEMIX A April 2012 Pape 32 y . KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No 415 STANDARD of SERVICE • PROGRAM CAPACITY - INVENTORY of RELOCATABLES - FFE and HEADCOUNT ENROLLMENT KSD Ao! Snare 9610 1 Spo ft I ,Spec Special' 2011-2012 Prnpram Cwssroot Rebcuaob 1 01112011 IOIlQ011 MIDDLE A&2 SM Cweckya au LLI. PW program PMWW We Use Capacay IP223FTE3 Headcount3 8CHOU CWres at 25-29 Cis Clamp C8139drya Rebolauee IaeaolWbe at 29 ea Enrollment Em invent a s uoaxa Cedar Heghts Middle Solbd CH 30 740 8 84 3 71 895 2 0 0 69300 693 Macaw Middle School MA 24 592 6 76 5 119 787 4 0 0 53426 636 Meeker Middle School MK 29 715 a 93 1 24 832 0 0 0 652 04 654 MerMwn Middle School NIJ 26 641 5 56 4 95 792 8 0 0 52222 623 Mi8 Creek Muktle School MC 33 813 6 55 2 46 916 0 2 58 882 20 B83 NORMaod NOW School NW 33 BIB 2 18 4 95 926 0 0 0 B4028 642 Kew Mmnew View Academy(Urad9a 3-12)Wide,School Go*7.8 ErcdYnam Se9 Mein 8600 86 Mods School TOTAL 175 4,314 34 302 19 452 8,148 14 2 58 4,21000 4,216 APPENDIX B KSDNallnen 9of SWWwd sere qp Fa Spec Spectal' 2011-2012 Rogan Clesamom Raloelale 10/1/2011 10/1/2011 SENIOR HIGH Sm O4saY BLL ail Rpm Preprem Prow= Use Use Cepeaty P223 FTE 3 Headcount e SCHOOLs m 25J1 Cls ca mes Capacity a R4bo oslss Ra®labia n 31 ea EnmllmeM Enrellmaa M Kent-MnMwn Senor High KM 68 1476 12 157 12 271 1,904 6 3 93 2,W160 2,048 Kentwke Senior High KL 88 1,423 13 163 16 381 1,957 2 0 0 1,65180 1,691 Kenbidge senior Hgh KR 55 1,713 13 136 18 428 2,277 0 4 124 2,09030 2,135 Kentwood Snior High KW 80 1,611 9 102 20 475 2169 5 4 124 I'm 58 2,009 Kent Mountain View Acadern teas-12) BenW H0 Gr846S-12 Enedlmat See am 17158 177 Kent Phoenix Academy PH Not-tredillonel Hqh Scrod 414 31140 335 Regional Jusks Center 4 RJ WA WA 100 1 Senior High TOTAL 239 6,193 47 50 88 1,5541 8,711 13 11 341 j 8,16026 8396 APPENDIX C Excludes Running Start a E Cmldliocd Ed students DISTRICT TOTAL g48 23,298 203 i,708 BS 2,o0s 27,689 88 39 1,029 25,59008 1 26,616 'Special Proar m Capecsy Includes ewewarns requiring specaa zed use such as Special Edunson,Career 8 Tedxdcal Education Programs,Computer Laos,etc 3 Secondary sal IN cepeaq Is scanted for 95%Wtre6on rate.SO Bede moved to HS in 2004 Redsad Fecslty Use Studir Is in progress for 2011-12 3 Enrollment is reported on FTE a HealmaK bams P223 Heedcoum excludes ECE 8 Collepo-omy Running Start soidnts Full heacko nt rmludrllg ECE a RS=27,349 Some trials may be slightly difiemd due to nunding 4 19 Jlnendes served at Ksig Couhq Regxxwi Justice Center are reported separst"for Inasbrdana Fumkng on Fcon E-572 Taal RJ count m October2010 Y 29 Kam SchoolDlshusSix-YwCapKelFaciksesPlan Total of Appendices A B &C April 2012 Page 33 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.416 USE of RELOCATABLES Sind Year 2011-2012 20I 2013 2013-2014 2014-2016 2015.2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 Relocatable Use 1 No a sawm Near sleoerd Ne a Midland No or somem No a smfa.4 No a sweat No of sawn Rebwle0lee ReaaeYga Rebagalea C RelocaYaMa Relawleaee Ca dty Rel ulaMa I Capedry Raloc *Wier;I C.pwer Riabcatables for dassroorn use 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 Relocat"s for program use as as as as e8 ea as (fe Computer labs,musk,e10-) Elementary CWNdt7 ReQWad 024 2 15 360 Is 466 32 766 41 9ad 45 1,080 24 676 33 792 Middle Sohod Capxrty Reaorad Q 29 3 0 a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6erew High CaWV Raqulled®31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 of Relocatablea Uffbed 4 127 127 127 127 127 127 127 ClafYomn RaWcalible/Capmty R"Md 15 360 1a 458 32 760 Al 004 45 1,080 24 576 33 792 Plan for AHocatfon of Required Classroom RelO=bbie Fac"skldtlded in Fatance Plan Elementary 112 1s 1a 32 41 45 24 33 Middle Sdiool 3 0 a 0 Q 0 0 0 Senior High 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOW 16 Is 32 41 45 24 33 1 Use of 8"0011e1 MkKaktablea W daseeaRlN or apecW programs Is baed on Seed and M¢Natkna efamammt ar eodM act" 2 Full Day IOndergaden at a6 Elemenlay achools will krorease the need for WaC9t6bles at the simra vy level until pam mentcapacity an be pmvided 3 Graft level Rown9guatlon-In 2004.can graft asnlenfa moved u high admix cfeaONp sufficient panmaNmt apamty at middle schools 4 NBtaph fekealables are blazed for a wkm Nrhyof purposes,new consauC6on and sou daly edluslmenis on erred to minimbe the repummavent mr rekcatables, Ram adod Dmmet Sz-Year Caporal Fadeties Plan APPENDIX D Apnl 2012 Pape 34 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No 415 Student Generation Fedor Survey ewer Ermentary Tarr S t u d e n t s Student Generation Factor a Single FamilyDevelopments Ana urft Total Elem MS NS Total Been MS HS 419 Ease Cmt-Park View-SUMV1009 HE 219 208 126 28 54 Cosa 0575 0128 0247 te7 England Meadows-Kent SC 13 19 9 4 8 1462 0692 0308 0462 we Eastpords me 99 35 25 4 6 0364 0253 0040 0061 NO Ferri Creel East-Kam SR 171 163 91 20 42 Calls 0 532 0 117 0 246 me Ferri Crag)Wan-Kent 8R 13O 112 75 19 18 0 802 0 577 0 146 0 138 410 Highland&Rhododendmn Eslae9 ML 41 39 20 9 10 0 951 0 488 0 220 0 244 as Kentlake Highlands SW 127 138 66 17 35 1087 Cosa 0134 0283 181 Mandan Ridge HE 70 31 24 2 5 0 443 0 343 0 029 0 071 asa North,Parke Meadows 6 PaM9 Mestl9sa South car 108 107 56 21 30 1 ODD 0 528 a 198 0263 422 Panther Meadows OR 32 32 20 4 8 1000 0825 0125 0250 to Rasds Meadow ML 37 17 9 4 4 0450 0243 a108 0108 7s Ssnm I The Reserve I Senerieid 7 CmBo,Has C'Q 351. 370 174 56 141 1 054 0 498 0 157 0 402 Add Tanana Ridge CW 134 73 39 9 25 0 545 0 291 0 087 0 1117 in The Perks-FakwoodlRerdon RW 172 153 a7 26 58 0890 0360 0183 0337 Hs Trowesky Park-Render, RW 167 131 as is 24 0784 0533 0108 01" 417 Wroad Cmsk-Coiegeor, CW 151 134 74 22 38 0970 0481 0143 0247 Total 2,023 1,752 293 264 506 0.866 0.486 0130 0.250 gene Ela WrAwy Tam S t u d e n t s Student Generation Fedor Multi-FamN De"lo nts Area unlike Total Elm MS Hs Total arm Ms Hs 41e Ad990AWWAMB-CaWrgban CO 200 74 43 7 24 0370 0215 0035 0120 o2 AW@fbrwk Apennines-Kent EH 207 135 92 20 23 0 652 0 4" 0 097 0111 ,ss Aherne Apartments-Kent SH 81 as 44 12 12 0840 0543 a1" 0148 146 Faawwd Pond Apertments-Renton FW 194 so a 7 16 0.340 0277 0036 0077 4,4 Park Pree Aperanenr-Kent SH 51 87 oil 11 20 1796 1 098 0 218 0 392 147 Red Mill at Fnrwood-Renton CC 96 21 13 1 7 0 219 0135 0 010 0 073 n7 Riverview-The Parka-Kant NO 148 56 24 10 22 0378 0162 0088 0149 ite Rook Creak Lending-KM SB 211 93 66 11 16 0441 0313 0052 0076 413 Silver Sprigs Apennine;-Kant PL 251 172 11e 18 38 0 685 0 492 0 072 0„151 1tx Sunrise at Benson Conks-Kent GR 88 25 7 6 12 0254 0080 0068 0136 7ota1 1,527 797 505 103 189 0.522 0.331 0 067 0.124 Kent SdwG Dlsti t WYear Capital POSWU Plan APPENDIX E April 2012 Pass 35 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE for Kent School District No. 415 2012 Capital Facilities Plan Issued with a 14-day comment and appeal period Description of Proposal: This threshold determination analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the following actions, which are so closely related to each other that they are in effect a single action- 1 The adoption of the Kent School District 2012 Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan by the Kent School District for the purposes of planning for the facilities needs of the District. 2. The amendment of the King County Comprehensive Plan to include the Kent School District 2012 Capital Facilities Plan as a part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the King County Comprehensive Plan. 3. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Kent to include the Kent School District's 2012 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Kent. 4. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Covington to include the Kent School District's 2012 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Covington. 5. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Renton to include the Kent School District's 2012 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Renton. 6 The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Auburn to include the Kent School District's 2012 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Auburn. 7. This proposal may also involve amendment of Comprehensive Plans of the Cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and/or SeaTac to incorporate the Kent School District 2012 Capital Facilities Plan into the 4apital Facilities element of that jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. Proponent: Kent School District No. 415 Location of the Proposal: The Kent School District includes an area of approximately 70 square miles. The City of Covington and portions of the cities of Kent, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac fall within the District's boundaries, as do parts of unincorporated King County Lead Agency: Kent School District No. 415 is the lead agency pursuant to WAC 197-11-926. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that the proposal does not pose a probable significant adverse impact to the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c). This decision was made after a review of the completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency This information is available to the public upon request. This Determination of Non-significance (DNS) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2) The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issue. Comments must be submitted by 4:00 p.m., June L 2012. The responsible official will reconsider the DNS based on timely comments and retain, modify, or, if significant adverse impacts are likely, Iswithdraw the DNS. If D is retained, it will be final after the expiration of the comment deadline. I/ Responsible Official: r Richard A. Stedry, hief Business Officer for Kent School District No. 415 Telephone. (253) 373-7295 Address: 12033 SE 256th Street#A-600 Kent, Washington 98030-6643 Appeals of this determination are governed by Board Policy No. 9280 which can be obtained from Dr. Richard A. Stedry, Chief Business Officer, Kent School District No. 415, 12033 SE 256th Street#A-600, Kent, Washington 98030-6643 and pursuant to WAC 197-11- 680 and RCW 43.21C.075. Date of Issue: May 2q,2012 Date Published: May 2,2012 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAC 197-11-960 Environmental Checklist. Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act($EPA), chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you realty do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal,write"do not know" or"does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for nonproject actions (part D) For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site"should be read as"proposal," "prepares," and "affected geographic area, respectively. a A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: The adoption of a six-year Capital Facilities Plan by the Kent School District. The Comprehensive Plans of King County, City of Kent, City of Covington, City of Renton, City of Auburn and possibly Cities of Maple Valley, Black Diamond and SeaTac have been and/or will be amended to include the Kent School District 2012 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Plan Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. A copy of the District's Plan is available for review in the District Finance& Planning Department. S' 2. Name of applicant, Kent School District No. 415. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person. Kent School District No 415 12033 SE 256th Street #A-600 Kent, WA 98030-6643 Contact Person: Dr. Richard A. Stedry, Chief Business Officer Telephone. (253) 373-7295 4 Date checklist prepared; April 9, 2012 5. Agency requesting checklist: Kent School District No. 415 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable). The 2012 Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan is scheduled to be forwarded to King County, Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Maple Valley, Black Diamond, and SeaTac for possible inclusion in each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan, The Capital Facilities Plan will be updated annually. Site-specific projects have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review. 7. Do you have-any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The Capital Facilities Plan reviews classroom additions to one existing high school and proposes construction of a new elementary school and a replacement of Covington Elementary School. 2 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal The above-referenced projects will undergo environmental review at the time of formal proposal. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. King County and Cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn will review and approve the Capital Facilities Plan for the purposes of impact fee ordinances and will need to adopt the Plan as an amendment to the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of King County and Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Auburn. Cities of Maple Valley, Black Diamond, and SeaTac may also review and approve the Plan for the purposes of any school impact fee ordinances and may adopt the Plan as an amendment to the Capital Facilities element of their Comprehensive Plans. 11 Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include,additional specific information on project description) This is a non-project action. This proposal involves the adoption of the Kent School District 2012 Capital Facilities Plan for the purpose of planning the facilities needs of the District and for inclusion in the Capital Facilities Plan element and possible amendment of the Comprehensive Plans for King County, City of Covington, City of Kent, City of Renton, City of Auburn, City of Black Diamond, City of SeaTac and City of Maple Valley. A copy of the Capital Facilities.Plan may be viewed at the Kent School District Business Services Department office. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s) Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The 2012 Capital Facilities Plan will affect the Kent School District. The District includes an area of approximately 70 square miles. The City of Covington, and portions of the Cities of Kent,Auburn, Renton, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, SeaTac and parts of unincorporated King County fail within the District's boundaries 3 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS --v-, 1. Earth a. General description of the site(circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The Kent School District is comprised of a variety of topographic land forms and gradients, including all of those listed. Specific topographic characteristics will be identified during the planning and permit process for each capital project. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Specific slope characteristics will be identified during the planning and permit process for each capital project. c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Specific soli types will be identified during the planning and permit process for each capital project. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable sods in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Unstable soils may exist within the Kent School District. Specific soil limitations on individuat project sites will be identified at the time of environmental review. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill_ Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to project- specific environmental review and local approval at the time of proposal. Proposed grading projects, as well as the purpose, type, quantity, and source of fill materials will be identified as appropriate to each project. f Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. It is possible that erosion could occur as a result of construction projects currently proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan. Individual projects and their erosion impacts will be evaluated on a site-specific basis. Individual projects will be subject to environmental review and local approval on the time of proposal. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings?) Percentage of impervious cover will vary with each capital facilities project and will be addressed during project-specific environmental review. 4 I h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Erosion potential on individual project sites will be addressed during project-specific environmental review. Relevant erosion reduction and control requirements will be met. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Various emissions, many construction-related, may result from individual projects. Air-quality impacts will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Non-project Actions b Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. i Off-site sources and necessary mitigation will be addressed during project-specific environmental review. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any, Plans for individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to environmental review and relevant local approval processes, including obtaining of any necessary air quality permits, at the time individual projects are formally proposed. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Non-project Actions. 3_ Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is a network of surface water bodies within the Kent School District. The surface water regimes and flow patterns have been or will be researched and incorporated in the design of each individual project. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Some projects may require work near these described waters Individual projects in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to environmental review and local approval requirements at the time the project is formally proposed. 5 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Information with respect to placement or removal of fill or dredge material will be addressed at the time of project-specific environmental review. Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known Any surface water withdrawals or diversions have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Each capital facilities project, if located in a floodplain area, will be required to meet applicable local regulations for flood areas. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Specific information regarding discharges of waste materials, if any, will be addressed during project-specific environmental review. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Non-project Actions. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may impact ground water resources. Each project will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review. Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Non-project Actions 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . .; agricultural, etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve Impacts of discharged waste material, if any, have been or will be addressed during site-specific, project-level environmental review • 6 c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow?Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may have varying storm water runoff consequences. Each project will be subject to environmental review and applicable local regulations. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Individual projects ancluded in the Capital Facilities Plan will have varying environmental impacts and will be subject to appropriate review and local regulations prior to construction. Information regarding waste materials will be presented at the time of such review. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Non-project Actions. d Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Specrfic measures to reduce or control runoff impacts have been or will be developed on a project-specific basis in cooperation with the appropriate jurisdiction. 4. Plants: a Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site. deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation There are various vegetative zones within the Kent School District. An inventory of species has been or will be produced as part of project-specific environmental review. b What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? 7 Impacts on vegetation will be determined at'the time of project-speck environmental review at the ti time the prcjed is formally proposed. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Non-project Actions. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Specific impacts to these species from individual projects have been or will be determined at the time of project proposal and will be addressed during site-specific, project-level environmental review. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any- Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to environmental review and local approval at the time of project proposal. 5. Animals: a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals. deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: An inventory of species observed on or near sites has been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review. b List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Specific impacts to these species from individual projects will be determined at the time of project proposal and will be reviewed in cooperation with the affected jurisdictions. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Impacts on migration routes, if any, will be addressed during site-specific, project- level environmental review. a d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: -- Appropriate measures to preserve or enhance wildlife have been or will be determined at the time of site-specific, project-level environmental review. 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The State Board of Education requires a life-cycle cost analysis of all heating, lighting, and insulating systems prior to allowing specific projects to proceed Energy needs will be decided at the time of specific engineering and site design planning. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Non-project Actions. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe: Individual projects of this Capital Facilities Plan will be evaluated as to their impact on the solar potential of adjacent projects during environmental review c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any Energy conservation measures will be considered at the project-specific design phase and environmental review. 7. Environmental Health: a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Non-project Actions. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Non-project Actions. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Proposed projects will comply with all current codes, standards, and rules and regulations. Individual projects have been or will be subject to environmental review and local approval at the time of formal submittal 9 b. Noise: 1) What types ofnoise exist in the area which may affect your project (for-- example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? A variety of noises exist within the Kent School District. Specific noise sources have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Normal construction noises would exist on a short-term basis during school construction. There could be an increase in traffic or operations-related noise which would be addressed during project specific environmental review Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Non-project Actions. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Project noise impacts have been or will be evaluated and mitigated during the project-specific environmental review. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. 8. Land and Shoreline Use. a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? There are a variety of land uses within the Kent School District, including residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, utility, agricultural, forestry, open space, recreational, etc. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. This question will be addressed during site-specific, project-level environmental review. c. Describe any structures on the site. Structures located on proposed sites have been or will be identified and described during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Structures to be demolished, if any, will be identified as part of the project-specific environmental review prows. e What is the current zonft classification of the sate? 10 There are,avariety of zoning classifications within the Kent School District. Site specific zoning information has been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review_ f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? An inventory of comprehensive plan designations has been or will be completed during project-specific environmental review. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Any shoreline master program designations have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an"environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Environme malty sensitive areas, if any, will be identified during project-speck environmental review. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? This information has been or will be provided at the time of project-specific environmental review. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? It is not anticipated that proposed projects will displace any people. Displacement of people, if any,will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to project- specific environmental review and local approval at the time the project is formally proposed. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Compatibility of the proposal and specific projects with existing uses and plans have been or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive planning process and during project-specific environmental review. 9. Housing: a. Approximately ly how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or lovwincome housing. No housing units would be provided. 1>. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Any impact of project proposals on existing housing has been or would be evaluated during project-specific environmental review procedures. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Measures to reduce or control any housing impacts have been or will be addressed during site-specific, project-level environmental review. 10. Aesthetics. a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas;_ what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Aesthetic impacts have been or will be determined at the time of site-specific, project- level environmental review. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Aesthetic impacts have been or will be determined at the time of site-specific, project- level environmental review. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Appropriate measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts have been or will be determined at the time of project-specific environmental review. 11. Light and Glare: a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light or glare impacts have been or will be determined at the time of protect-specific environmental review. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Light or glare impacts have been or will be determined at the time of project-specific environmental review. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Off-site sources of light or glare have been or will be evaluated at the time of project specific environmental review. 12 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Mitigation of light and glare impact has been or will be addressed during project- specific environmental review. 12. Recreation: a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are a variety of formal and informal recreational facilities within the Kent School District. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Recreational impacts have been or will be addressed during project specific environmental review. Projects in the Capital Fatalities Plan may enhance recreational opportunities and uses. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any, Any adverse effects on recreation stemming from individual project proposals have been or will be subject to mitigation during the environmental review procedure. A school site usually provides recreational facilities to the community in the form of additional play fields and gymnasiums. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. The existence of historic and cultural resources will be determined at the time of project-specific environmental review. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site An inventory of historical sites has been or will be conducted as part of project specific environmental review. c Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed on a project-specific basis. 13 -— -- - - - -14. Trans -- - -i -- - - a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system-. Show on site plans, if any. Impact on public streets and highways has been or will be assessed during project- specific environmental review. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The relationship between specific projects and public transit has been or will be assessed during project-specific environmental review. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? An inventory of parking spaces and the impacts of specific projects on parking spaces have been or will be conducted during project-specific environmental review. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The development of new schools may require new access roads or streets. This issue will be fully addressed during project-speck environmental review. e Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Use of water, rail or air transportation has been or will be addressed during site- specific, project-level environmental review. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Each project proposal has been or will be separately evaluated as to traffic impacts g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any Mitigation of impacts on transportation has been or wilt be addressed during project- specific environmental review. 15. Public Services: a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. 14 The District does not anticipate that the projects identified in the Capital Facilities— — —" Plan will substantially increase the need for other public services. Impacts have been or will be evaluated on a project-specific basis. b._ Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Schools are built with automatic security systems, fire alarms, smoke alarms, heat sensors and sprinkler systems. 16. Utilities: a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Utilities available at project sites have been or will be identified during project specific environmental review. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Utility revisions and construction needs will be identified during project-specific environmental review. C. SIGNATURE The ab wers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that t Vlead envy is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Dr.Richand A.Stedry,Chief Business offs r Date Submitted: Mays, 2012 is D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPFtOJECT ACTIONS I (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances, or production of noise? To the extent this Plan makes it more likely that school facilities will be constructed, and/or renovated or remodeled, some of these environmental impacts will be more likely. Additional impermeable surfaces, such as roofs, parking lots, sidewalks, access roads and playgrounds will increase storm water runoff, which could enter surface or ground water. Emissions to air could result from heating systems, emergency generators and other equipment, and from additional car and bus trips to and from the school for students and faculty. Any emissions resulting from this Plan should not require the production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances,with the possible exception of storage of diesel fuel or gasoline for emergency generating equipment. Noise may result from additional traffic and from concentrating several hundred children at a new facility, especially before and after school and during recesses. To the extent this proposal allows additional residential development to occur, these impacts would also increase somewhat, but it is not possible to quantify those impacts at this time. The impacts would depend on the type, location and distribution of housing, for example, whether single or multiple family and the location of the school. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Facilities implementing the Pian have been or will be evaluated at the project specific level and impacts will be mitigated accordingly Storm water detention and runoff will meet applicable County andlor City requirements and, depending on the date of actual construction, may be subject to a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES') permitting requirements. Discharges to air will be minimal, and will meet any applicable requirements of the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Authority. Fuel oil will be stored according to local and state requirements. 3.6 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The Plan itself will have no impact on these elements of the environment. Depending on the particularsite, construction of facilities may require clearing sites of plants and loss of animal habitat. To the extent residential development is allowed, additional area may be cleared and eliminated as habitat for animals There are not likely to be any impacts on fish or marine life, although some water quality degradation in streams and rivers could occur due to increased residential development. These impacts have been or will be addressed in more detail during protect-specific environmental review when appropriate. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Individual projects will be evaluated and mitigated appropriately on a project-specific basis, but specific mitigation proposals cannot be identified at this time. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Any actual projects resulting from this Plan would consume heating fuel and electrical energy. Increased traffic resulting from the construction of additional facilities would consume petroleum based fuels. Reduced traffic resulting from construction of another neighborhood school may also reduce amounts of fuel consumed, but it is not possible to quantify such reduction in consumption at this time These impacts have been or will be addressed in more detail during protect-specific environmental review when appropriate. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Facilities would be constructed in accordance with applicable energy efficiency standards. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands,floodplains, or prime farmlands? The Plan and facilities constructed pursuant to the Plan should have no impact on these resources. It is not possible to predict whether other development made possible by this Plan would affect sensitive areas. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: No specific measures are being proposed at this time. Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed during project-specific review. Annual updates of this Plan will be coordinated with King County, Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, SeaTac, and Maple Valley as part of the Growth Management Act process, one of the purposes of which is to protect environmentally sensitive areas To the extent the School District's facilities planning process is part of the overall growth management planning process, these resources are more likely to be protected. 17 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage lend or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The Plan will not have any impact on land or shoreline use that is incompatible with existing comprehensive plans, land use codes, or shoreline management plans. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None are proposed at this time Actual facilities constructed to implement the Plan will be sited and constructed to avoid or reduce land use impacts. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? This proposal should not create substantial new demands for transportation. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create an increase in traffic near new District facilities but also reduce traffic by creating the opportunity for more students to walk to a closer school. The construction of the facilities included in the Capital Facilities Plan may result in minor increases in the demand for public services and utilities, such as fire and police protection, and water, sewer, and electric utilities. None of these impacts are likely to be significant. The impacts on transportation and public services and utilities of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be addressed during project-level review when appropnate. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are. No measures to reduce or respond to such demands are proposed at this time. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan will not conflict with any laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. is FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Ml �E E p I q i � I t $ x rn ail ,J a �• Ai �tk t"�T diil�iwy `3 .', trt117,�rr ii"�d X� 3 is �' 7 I y ' ri ,i - �iSWwk. ' fi ( P Y -�M1, h�a ''C�'i'L�° .tom �;�,• �-,�r-�'E;, evl�,�iie�4��ayl `" _li ii i ? [dt • _ ''-�Ais ra :,kTT"a.��' a�l i��mga'F��Fd�i�,sr�.(-� liiii�i'�i� ii��t.�i�'r�4in�i lik`�ii _ �_ __ �ii r rr� �rL4�` Am r'; ', ',a �F�' `tIV t r _ FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BOARD OF EDUCATION Tony Moore Angela Gnffin Ed Barney Danny Peterson Claire Wilson SUPERINTENDENT Rob Neu Prepared by Sally D McLean Tanya Nascimento FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 2 SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction 3 Inventory of Educational Facilities 4 Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities 5 Needs Forecast-Existing Facilities 6 Needs Forecast-New Facilities 7 Six Year Finance Plan 8 SECTION 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Introduction 9 Map-Elementary Boundaries 10 Map-Middle School Boundaries 11 Map-High School Boundaries 12 SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction 13 Building Capacities 14-15 Portable Locations 16-17 Student Forecast 18-20 Capacity Summaries 21-25 King County Impact Fee Calculations 26-28 SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2011 29-31 PLAN 1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN I1'aTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB)2929(1990)and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, City of Kent Ordinance No 3260 effective March 1996, and the City of Auburn Ordinance No. 5078 effective 1998,Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 2013 Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2012 This Plan is scheduled for adoption by King County, the City of Kent, City of Federal Way and the City of Auburn and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance The City of Des Moines collects school impact fees as part of the SEPA process The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within winch urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing,jobs, services, culture, and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies or management need Currently,the District plans to replace Federal Way High School and to increase capacity by approximately 200 students. Federal Way High School was built in 1938 The estimated cost to rebuild Federal Way High School is $110 million This includes $21 million for construction inflation and is not included in the Finance Plan or Impact Fee calculation Final construction costs are under consideration by the Board for the November 2012 levy election. The District continues to monitor factors that may have an impact on enrollment and capacity at our schools. One such factor is SHB 2776, which will phase in full-day kindergarten for all students and decrease K-3 class size from 20 to 17 This is proposed to be fully funded by 2017-18. Using current enrollment,the decrease in class size would create the need for an additiona158 classes for K-3 students. This classroom need is expected to fluctuate due to changing demographics We will also continue to study school boundaries as new housing and fluctuating populations impact specific schools. Some shifts in boundaries may be required in the coming years. We currently have two areas under review for boundary changes The maps included in this Plan reflect our current boundaries. 2 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL FACILPTIES PLAN SECTION 1-THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools A Financial Plan that shows expected funding for any new construction,portables and modernization listed follows this 3 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPTI'AL FACILITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTM, OCi� OLS ( 5� Adelaide 1635 SW 304`"St Federal Way 98023 Brigadoon 3601 SW 336d'St Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 2986'St Auburn 98001 Enterprise 35101 5"'Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Green Gables 32607 47 h Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308d`St Auburn 98001 Lake Grove 303 SW 308"St Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35827 32id Ave S Auburn 98001 Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Rd Federal Way 98003 Meredith Hill 5830 S 300d'St Auburn 98001 Mirror Lake 625 S 314d'St Federal Way 98003 Nautilus(K-8) 1000 S 289d'St Federal Way 98003 Olympic View 2626 SW 327`h St Federal Way 98023 Panther Lake 34424 l"Ave S Federal Way 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368"St Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 34600 12d'Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Silver Lake 1310 SW 325`t'PI Federal Way 98023 Star Lake 4014 S 270d'St Kent 98032 Sunnycrest 24629 42"d Ave S Kent 98032 Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320`h St Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42"d Ave S Auburn 98001 Wildwood 2405 S 300d'St Federal Way 98003 Woodmont(K-8) 26454 16"Ave S Des Moines 98198 MIDDLE SCHOOLS(6-8) Federal Way Public Academy(6-10) 34620 9d'Ave S Federal Way 98003 Mahee 36001 1"Ave S Federal Way 98003 Kilo 4400 S 308"'St Auburn 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 3le St Federal Way 98023 Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Rd Federal Way 98003 Saghahe 33914 19"Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Sequoyah 3450 S 360d'ST Auburn 98001 Totem 26630 40"Ave S Kent 98032 TAF Academy(6-12) 26630 40d'Ave S Kent 98032 HIGH SCHOOLS(9-12) Decatur 2800 SW 320d'St Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 30611 16d'Ave S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288d'St Auburn 98001 Todd Beamer 35999 16d'Ave S Federal Way 98003 Career Academy at Truman 31455 28 h Ave S Federal Way 98003 ADDITIONAL SCHOOLS Internet Academy(K-12) 31455 28a'Ave S Federal Way 98003 Merit School(6-12) 36001 l'Ave S Federal Way 98003 Employment Transition Program(12+) 33250 21"Ave SW Federal Way 98023 4 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CURRENT INVENTORY NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Developed Property Central Kitchen 1344 S 308'" St Federal Way 98003 Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308'h St Federal Way 98003 Educational Services Center 33330 8'"Ave S Federal Way 98003 Support Services Center 1211 S 332ad St Federal Way 98003 Surplussed Space Admmmstrative Building 31405 18d Ave S Federal Way 98003 MOT Site 1066 S 320d` St Federal Way 98003 Notes: In January 2012,the Administrative Building, Community Resource Center, and Student Support Annex were combined into the Educational Services Center Central Kitchen will be relocated to this site in late 2012. The Admimstration Building and MOT Site have been surplussed and will be marketed for sale Undeveloped Property Site Location 75 SW 360th Street& 3rd Avenue SW—9 2 Acres 65 S 351 st Street& 52nd Avenue S—8 8 Acres 60 E of 10th Avenue SW - SW 334th& SW 335'" Streets - 10.04 Acres 73 N of SW 320'"and east of 45`"PL SW—23.45 Acres 71 S 344th Street&46th Avenue S - 17.47 Acres 82 ls'Wary S and S 342°d St—Minimal acreage 96 S 308 St and 14'"Ave S—.36 Acres Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. 5 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST-EXISTING FACILITIES EXISTING FACII.ITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS Purchase and Relocate Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is Portables Impact Fees Federal Way High School Replace Existing Building, Capital levy request Increase Capacity As part of the multi-phase plan,the District intends to increase capacity for lugh school students with expansion at the Federal Way High School site. Increased capacity at Federal Way High, and Decatur High in later phases, supplant the need for construction of a fifth comprehensive high school. 6 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST-ADDITIONAL FACILITIES NEW FACILITY LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS No current plans for additional facilities. 7 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Six Year Finance Plan Secured Funding Sources Impact Fees. 1 89,884 Land Sale Funds 2 10 150 476 Bond Funds(3) $8,364,968 Slab Math(4) $12,739,948 TOTAL $1086 556 Projected Revenue Sources State Maths $0 Bond or Levy Funds :S700 000 Land Find Salsa 0,000Ian ct Fees 0000 TOTAL 0,000 Actual and PlannedFOtpa2dlturCS JTotsISecured Funding sod Projected Revenue S91,664,556 NEW SCHOOLS aW Bu et 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Total Cost MPtfsr Yaare 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-19 2018-19 2013-2019 MODERNIZATION ANDEXPANSION FederalWay High School 9 E10000 0000000 540000000 Slt, o00 $81000000 SSI00 000 SITEAC UISITION ow=Center S38 S200 000 0 000 S205 000 $215 000 S220 000 S225 000 $235 000 $1,505,000 S1,885,000 ZU10yruent Treonhoa program)(10) TEMPORARY FACILITIES ormNas 1 S2000D0 $200000 S200000 120 000 $800000 S80 000 OTAL $385,000 $10,400,000 00,400 00 S40,405,000 $11,;15,2 $220,000 5225,000 S235,000 583,300,000 503,683,000 NOTES 1 Thceefma m curreollybeng held maKmg County.CdyofFed"Way and City of Knit nepenthe account,mdwdlbe avade*forusebythe DaatnctfusyKcmmilaov OM This is year and balsam on 1281111 2 These fando ne,eapeded to construct the ale ofthe cumet BSC bad MOT sties This b year und balance on 1251111 3 Thu n®e 1251111 balance of band fonds.This agure includes merest comings. 4 Thu rgneenmO die balance ofSute Match Foods fu Yo"K Pumho Lim Lakeland.=it ycimtbl®anmnes sod Lakota Middle School.wort on specific building upgrades is occurring Thai a be balance on 13131111 5 Thu u stiupeled Sme Match fuproledsaWchedta omemboadmm Thu tobasedun December 2011 OSPI approved awards State Mach fiends ore being used for high pnorily repass,upgrades and syst r anprovemmislo mtsg buildings Thane impravemanm include HVAC.snit other struontial mprovemmts are not related b capacity mama¢ All renaming prolems areecLeduledto be complete by Suanmm 2012 6,Them mclude$10m of voter approved,but nott maned and 360m schadaled for voter approval in November 2012 7 Pryoaedsalcofnrpluspropeniee Thine foods will banned to rates debt occurred for the acquisition of a replacement Educational Support Center 8 Thane we projected&es bused upon known residential developments a the Dormer overdo and siayaaa This fgure assumes$25,000 pa month for the nerl sis ycm This figure has been adjusted in reflect the current economy 9 Funding Board approval andvroa authorization in Novembar2012 The Ulm included in thisplanis natotconstrocnon mflamn l0 Neeman Ceocawes purchmed n 2010 m haoac tba bmploym Tlanaem Prop® The 32,Iro parchss his been f nanerd through s elan approved teal prograin through 2020 It 7-amfamnprunmlthec"of purchamngmdm Wibgnavporhbla The portable yppadimra in future years may replace mlnngpmtables sat are not functional Throe may not menus capacity and mow mcluded tin the ealmcity sia0muy 8 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 2-MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools has twenty-one elementary schools (grades K-5), two schools with a K-8 grade configuration, seven middle school schools (grades 6-8), four high schools (grades 9-12) and three small secondary schools The Federal Way Public Academy serves students in grades 6-10. The TAF Academy serves students in grades 6- 12 who reside in the Totem Middle School service area. The Career Academy at Truman High School serves students in grades 9-12 The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school, by school type (Career Academy at Truman High School and Federal Way Public Academy serve students from throughout the District). The identified boundaries are reviewed annually Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs that affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas The Growth Management Act requires that ajunsdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments In the case of most public facilities,new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School Districts are different. If the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school We currently have 2 areas under consideration for boundary changes It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single development 9 - UAL FACE dTIES PLAN FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAP UAL Tvoy Pubic Sdibds ELEMENTARYSCIMOLS kIRLN3LE$C}N761L5 _ '� "{ m 1 ADELAIDEELEMENEARV 35 FWPLOLICACADEMY 2 RRIGADOON ELEMENTARY 30 ILLAWE MUDDLE SCHOOL 3 CAMELDT ELEMEMART 31 10L.O MIDDLE - - d ENTERPRISEELEMEIPIM 32 LALWTA WDDLESCHOOL '* 5 GREEN GABLES ELEMENTAW( 33 SRCJL IAWFA MME SCHOOL 5 LAKE DOLLOFF ELEMENTARY 34 SAGHALIE MiDt}LE SCHOOL % - 7 LAKE GROVE ELEMENTARY 37 SE A FIfH DDLE.SCHOOL 1 .., 8 LAKELAND ELEMENTARY 3g TOTEMMOMSCHOUL ' 9 MARK TWAIN ELEKWATARY 3M TAFACADIEW � '�.- �.,• 10 MEREDITH HILL ELEMENTARY 11 MIFUtOR LAKE ELEMENTARY H<6#'ISCHOO S _l ,—^a 7-vT 12 NAUMLISK-SS43400L J� 13 OLYMPICVIEW ELEMENTARY [0 DECATUR HIGH 14 PANTHERLAKE ELEMENTARY dl THOFIEDWALJEFFUG H 15 RAINIER VIEW ELEMENTARY THDMAS}EFFHtST31 N15H .P 15 SHERWOOD FOREST ELEA6NTAR4 AS TODDILEAMERHIGH 17 SILVER LAKE ELEMENTARY 490 CAREER AMY 6 TRUMAN GDE 18 STAR LAKE ELEMENTARY 51 ETFINDRMANCENTER y N t c= 19 SUNNYCRESTELEMEN'WlRY 20 TWIN LAKESELEMENTAW AC11[NLSTRA717VE SITES 21 VALHALLA ELEMENTARY ■ � .., 22 W}lDSVODQ ELEMENTARY 23 NT K-R SCHOOL k dy e A, FWD$PRT]PEERTY ILI _ J- , � � 1 4a ELEMENTARY B 0 U IDA S 00193 as D9 L2 Date:5A.12 10 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN It* vp AlFederalY jw Public Sd-6as ■ ELEMENFARTSCHOOLS MkD!)LE Sti10DLfi '• '' i ADEIJADEEtEMENTARY 36 PMPU&ICACAMMY 2 814I6ADOON EiEM WTArW 30 IL4A4EEANOLiEE StH00L 3 CAMELOTELEMEMURY 31 KILOMIDULESCHOOL n..3 R ENTERPRISEELEMENTAM 32 LAKOTA MIDDLE SCHOOL 5 GREEN GABLES ELEMENTARY 33 SACAIAWEAMDDLE SCHOOL ' 6 LAKE DOLLCIFFELI EHTARY 34 SkMALIEUIODLESMOOL , 7 LAKE GROVE ELEMENTARY 37 S€QUOYANAIRDOLE SCHOOL R LAKELAW ELEMENT ART 35 TOFEMMIMESCHOOL 0 MARK TWAIN ELEMENTARY 3M TAFACAOSW 10 MEREDITH HILL ELEMANTARY It MIRROR LAKE ELEMENTARY HiGHSCHOMS i$ OLYMPINALMLis IE SELEM0000L 40 DECATUR HIGH !! .•.•A•_ 13 OLYMPIR LAKE ELEMENTARY 13 PANTHER LAKE ELEMEWARY 41 FEDERAL WAY HIGH 15 RAINIER VIBN ELEMENTARY45 TODD REAMER HIGH ' TFIDMA516FEti3pL4 HI6fL 16 SHERWOOD FOREST ELEMENTARY 490 �ACAOEMY!'FiIUMAN 27 SILVER LAKE ELEMENTARY 51 ETP/WRMANCEMER 1B STAR LAKE ELEMENTARY i9 SUNNYMSTELEMENTAW L 20 TWIN UHCESELEMENTARY pa"INISTRA72YE SITES 21 VALHALLA ELEMENTARY iN J 22 WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY 23 WOODMONT K-K SCHOOL ■ - Fwcs PRCQERrY r IL ti � 4 a r i 4 r• x13V � � r MIL3DUEBOUNDARIES x N 00-- Oates 5.4.22 11 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Fedevi ■ ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS S ADELAMEELEMEMILY FWPUKXAtJ`#3 W 2 BRLGADOON ELEMENTARY 30 &AFMEM IDDLE SCHOOL 3 CAMELOTELEMENTART 32 KILO KODDLE SCFLOOL 4 ENTERPRISE ELEMENTARY 32 IAKOU WHOM SCHOOL .^ " S GREEN GABLES ELEMENTARY ' S LAKE DOLLOFFELEMENTARY 34 yRWE SCHOOL L L _` 7 LAKE GROVE ELEMENTARY -- 37 SE#14WAHhffiX3@ESCHOOL 9 LAKELAND ELEMENTARY 35 TOTEMMDMSCHOOL f 9 MARK TWAIN ETET$NTARY 391 TAFACtDEMY '- 10 MEREDITH WLELEMEHTARY 22 MIRROR LAKE ELEMENTARY y j, - 22 NAUTILUS Ka 5CHD0L ® H$6H5CHOOl3 �..�,Kv eTi T7-1 23 OLYMFlCVIEW ELEMENAW 40 OECATURHWH ;�'' J E4 PANTHER LAKE fEMIEW 42 FEDERRLWAYHFGH I 423 THDMASSEfERWH HIGH ARY 1S F51B7ER VIEW ELEM£ND[RY 29 SHERWOOD FORESTEL$OMARY 4S TOODBEAMERFWH S 27 SILVER LAKE ELEMENTARY 49D CAREER ACADEMY CO TRUMAN 2$ STAR LAKE ELEMEMARY 52 ETP/NORMANTcNTER 29 SUNNYCREST ELEMIMM 26 TM LA ESEIEMENTARY . ADMINISTRATIVE BITES 22 YALNALLA ELEMSTW 22 WIIDYYDOD ELEMENTARY 23 WOODMONT K-B SCHOTA FMIS PROPERTY ft -1 eTs; 4j Y +, V ILL HIGH �r U7tAI VIEW ft' Willa OG 09 £2 �tAkS Doter 5.4.12 12 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 3-SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities-The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast—2013 through 2019 Capacity Summaries King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi-Famrly Units 13 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Building Capacities This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's"standard of service"in order to ascertain the District's current and future.capacity, The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity,but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. In general, the District's current target class size provides that the average class size for a standard classroom for grades K through 2 should be 20 students In grades 3-5 the target is 25 students. For grades 6 to 12 the target class size is 26 students. Classrooms for students with Individualized Education Program (Special Education) needs are calculated at 12 seats per classroom. Using the OSPI square footage calculation as a base line,the District has calculated a program capacity for all schools. A recent Study& Survey was the basis for changes to the OSPI building report The following list clarifies the adjustments to the OSPI calculation Music Rooms: Each elementary school requires a standard classroom for music instruction. All Day Kindergarten: Every elementary school operates at least one all day Kindergarten program. These all day Kindergarten programs require additional capacity because the standard classroom is available for one all day session rather than two half day sessions. The District will operate 53 sections of all day Kindergarten in 2012-13. Special Education Resource Rooms: Each elementary and middle school requires the use of a standard classroom(s)for special education students requiring instruction to address speck disabilities English as a Second Language Programs: Each elementary,middle school and high school requires the use of a standard classroom for students learning English as a second language Middle School Computer Labs: Each middle school has computer labs,except Totem Middle School Wireless access has been installed at all secondary schools. If additional classroom space is needed,these computer labs may be converted to mobile carts. High School Career Development and Learning Center(Resource)Room: Each high school provides special education resource room and career development classrooms for students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities Presch ool1E CEAPfHeadstart: Our district currently offers preschool programs for both special needs&typically developing students at 8 elementary schools. We also have the ECEAP and Headstart program at 6 schools (3 elementary&3 high schools). These programs decrease capacity at those sites Alternative Learning Experience: Federal Way offers students the opportunity to participate in an Alternative Learning Experience through our Internet Academy. These students have never been included in the capacity calculation of unhoused students. 14 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITIES ELEMENTARYBURDING MIDDLE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAMCAPACIfY PROGRAMCAPACIPY School Name Headcount School Name Headcount FTE Adelaide 378 Malice 855 864 Bngadoon 325 Kilo 829 837 Camelot 255 Lakota 707 714 Enterprise 461 Sacajawea 655 662 Green Gables 477 Saghake 804 812 Lake Dolloff 439 Se uo ah 569 575 Lake Grove 335 Totem 739 746 Lakeland 409 Federal Way Public Academy 209 211 MarkTwam 302 Technology Access Foundation Academy" Meredith Hill 456 Merit School** Mirror Lake 337 12011 TOTAL 5,367 5,421 Nautilus(K-8) 370 Olympic View 357 *Mdie Schoai Aierage 737 744 Panther Lake 444 Rainier View 435 HUI SCHOOL BUILDING Sherwood Forest 429 PROGRAMCAPACIfY Silver Lake 419 Star lake 370 SchoolName Headcount FTE Sunn crest 394 Decatur 1249 1,336 Twin Ickes 293 Federal Way 1492 1,596 Valhalla 427 Thomas Jefferson 1349 1,443 Wildwood 329 Todd Bearner 1142 1,221 Woodmont(K-8) 352 Career Academy at Truman 163 174 2011 TOTAL 8,793 Federal Way Public Academy 109 117 faiployment Transition Program 48 51 Technology Access Foundation Academy** HementaryArerage 382 Merit School** 2011 TOTAL 5,552 5,938 I*Mgb School Average 1 08 1399 Notes *Federal Way Public Academy,Career Academy at Truman High School,and Finployment Transition Program are non-boundary schools These schools are not used in the calculated averages **Technology Access Foundation Academy is housed entirely in portables on the Totem Middle School site. Merit School is housed etituety in portables on the Illalice Middle School site. 15 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL FACILTTIES PLAN Portable Locations The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not an efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year Portables are used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students when increasing population impacts a school attendance area Portables may also be required to house students when new or changing programs require additional capacity They also provide temporary housing for students until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition In these cases,the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. It is the practice and philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that portables are not acceptable as permanent facilities The following page provides a-list of the location of the portable facilities, used for temporary educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools 16 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS PORTABLES LOCATED PORTABLES LOCATED ATEL.IINFIV'TTARYSCHOOLS ATINGHSCHOOIS NON NON INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL INS TAUCTIONAL Adelaide 1 2 Decatur 9 Bn adoon 1 Federal Way 2 1 Camelot 1 Thomas Jefferson 10 Fnterpnse 2 1 Todd Beamer 9 Green Gables 1 TAF Academy8 1 Lake Dolloff 1 1 TOTAL 38 2 Lake Clove 1 1 Lakeland Mark Twam 2 1 Meredith Hill 1 2 Muror Lake 4 1 PORTABLES LOCATED Nautilus 1 AT SUPPORT FACE LTM Olympic View 1 1 Panther Lake MOT 1 Ramier View 3 TDC 5 Sherwood Forest 3 1 TOTAL 6 Silver Lake 1 3 Star Lake 4 Sunn crest HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES Twm Lakes 1 2 Valhalla Sherwood Forest 1 W ildwood 4 W oodmont 3 Total 1 TOTAL 31 21 PORTABLES LOCATED AT MiDDLESCHOOLS NON INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL lHahee 1 2 Kilo 7 Lakota Saca awea 7 Saghahe 2 2 Se uo ah 1 1 Totem Ment 3 TAF Acadenry 8 1 29 6 17 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Student Forecast Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value(grade level)as it progresses through time In a stable population the cohort would be 100 for all grades This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten)are a umque problem in cohort analysis The district collects information on birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student enrollments The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts These are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depenchng on the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted. A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level The Enrollment MasterTM software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression(cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment In December 2006,the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District. The report was complete in January 2007. The model used to forecast next year's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county-wide average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections. The long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes in the 5-19 age group for King County. Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of 18 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL FAC1I.dTIES PLAN something else(erg population)or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend for the school-age population over time. The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2017 This model produces a projection that is between 23,000 and 24,000 when applied to the low, medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington Near term projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by current local economic conditions Current economic conditions do appear to be affecting enrollment. This is reflected in the District's projections. The District tracks new development from five permitting jurisdictions Long range planning assumes a student yield from proposed new housing consistent with historical growth patterns. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school district community in the future. 19 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL FACILPTIES PLAN Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections Sunphfied FTE(K Headcount= 5 FTE,Mu#Ue School FTE=99 Headcount,High School FTE= 935Headcount) Total K-12 Percent Calendar Yr School Year Elementary Middle School High School FTE Change 2007 2006-07 9,022 5,261 6,754 21,037 2008 2007-08 8,912 5,167 6,637 20,716 -1 5% 2009 2008-09 8,865 5,155 6,456 20,476 -12% 2010 2009-10 8,738 5,119 6,594 20,451 -01% 2011 2010-11 8,753 5,142 6,544 20,439 -0.1% 2012 2011-12 8,800 5,134 6,448 20,382 -0 3% 2013 B2012-13 8,942 5,089 6,412 20,443 0 3% 2014 P2013-14 9,042 5,062 6,424 20,528 04% 2015 P2014-15 9,125 5,105 6,391 20,621 0 5% 2016 P2015-16 9,205 5,181 6,347 20,733 0 5% 2017 P2016-17 9,310 5,226 6,311 20,847 a5% 2018 P2017-18 9,406 5,254 6,321 20,981 a6% 2019 P2018.19 9,492 5,278 6,381 21,151 08% Elementwy%5 MiddleSckod 6-8 H:gh School 912 Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast 22,000 21,000 20,000 19,000 � 18,000 17,000 tRt s�ai� r3 16000 04 Ii =4- 15,000 ��i� School Year ®FTE 20 k FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN sty Summaries All Grades,Elementary,Middle School, and High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Bmlding Capacity information and the Student Forecast information The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, noddle school, and high school levels individually The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year 21 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACIPYSIMIARY-AIL GRADES Budget -- Projected-- Calendar Year 2013 2014 1 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 CAPACITY School Year 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 BUILDMPROORAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 19,112 19,712 19,712 19,912 19,912 19,912 19,912 7A=dsted subtract ch=ace Capacity Pro ramHeadcounCCa ac 19712 19,712 19,912 119,912 119,912 19,912 14,912 MOLLNm4T Basic FTElauollment 20,443 "20,52820�,62120,733 20,847 2Q981 21,151Internet Acad Enrollment AAFT� 315 (315) 315) 315) (315) SURPLUS OR OUSID �' ma RELOCATABLECAPACITY Current Portable Capacity 2,325 2,325 2,325 2,275 2,275 2,275 2,275 Deduct Portable Capacity Add New Portable Capacity SURPLUS OR M4HOUSID) PROQ2AMAND RELOCATABLE 22 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACirYSUMMARY-ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Budget Project -- Calendar Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 CAPACITY School Year 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 BUU DWGPROGRAM FFAD COUNT CAPACITY 793 8,793 8,793 8,793 8,793 1 8,793 8,793 Ad usted Piogram Headee<uut a 1 8,793 1, 8,793 I 8,793 8,793 $,793 8,793 ENROL.LNMW Basic FTEEnrollment 8,942 9,042 9,125 9,205 9,310 9,406 9,492 Internet Academy( (36) (36) (36) (36) (36) (36) (36) SURPLUS OR USED) RELOCATABL.E CAPAMY2 Current Portable Capacity 800 1 800 800 800 800 800 800 SURPLUS OR(LMOUSED) PROGRAMAND RELOCATABLE NOTES: 1 Internet Academy students are included m projections but do not require fulltmie use of school facilities 2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available This is a calculated number only The actualnumber of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use 23 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCI40OLS 2013 CAPITAL,FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITYSUN1IAl MIDDLE SCHOOLS Budget -- Pro ected-- Calendar Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 CAPACITY School Year 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 BUnDINGPROGRAM HEAJ)CQIINT CAPACITY 5,367 5,367 5,367 5,367 5,367 5,367 5,367 Add or subtract changes in capacity Adjustediffi HeiMMpacO 5 7 5,367 5,367 5,367 5,367 5,367 5,367 RMOLLIENT BasicYFEEnrollment 51 089 5,062 5,105 5,181 5,226 5,254 1 5,278 Internet Academy(AAFM� aP 74 L 74 74)Mho. 4) 74) 74 SURPLUS OR ED RELOCATABLE CAPACHY2 Current Portable Capacity 575 575 575 575 575 575 575 Add/Subtract ortable ca ac SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAMAND RELOCATABLE NOTES: I Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full tune use of school tackles 2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available This is a calculated number only The actual number of portables that wil be used will be based on actual student population needs The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use 24 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPAMYSUNMARY-HKM SCHOOLS Budget -- Projected-- Calendar Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 CAPACM School Year 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 BUIIDIIdGPROQtAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY' 5552 5,552 5,552 5,752 5,752 5,752 5,752 MMMMEMMEM MEN WE Mw WE Add or subtract changes at capacity Add capacity to Federal Way HS 200 Ad' steel Program lkadceni t 5,552 1 5,552 1 5,752 15,752 1 5,752 5,752 1 5,752 ENROLLMENT Basic FTEEarollment 6,412 1 6,424 1 6,391 6,347 6,311 6,321 6,381 Intemet Academ A (205 205 (2 (2 5 (205 (205 (205) SURPLUS OR([flMUSED RELOCATABLE CAPAcr& Current Portable Capacity 950 950 950 900 900 900 900 Add/Subtract portable capacity Subtract rtable ca ac at Federal Wa llS 50 Elm am MA SURPLUS OR P4HOTEM)) PROQUMAND REIMATABLE NOTES: 1 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full tune use of school facilities 2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available.This is a calculated number only The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs The District may begin to pull portables fromthe mstnictional inventory Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use 3 Capacity for unhoused students will be accom mdated with traveling teachers and no planning time in some classrooms. 25 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN KingLCau=.the City of Federal Way. and the City of Kept Impact Fee Calculations Single and Multi-Fanuly Residences Each junsdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substantially adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent The formula requires the astnct to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that distnct. - STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single-family units and multi-family units. The factors used in the 2013 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single-firmly units that were constructed in the last five(5)years. -IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Following the calculations for the student generation factor is a copy of the Impact Fee Calculation for single family and multi-family units based on King County Code 21A and the Growth Management Act. ➢ Temporary Facility Cost is the average cost of a portable purchased within the last 12 months. Plan Year 2013 Plan Year 2012 Single Family Units $49014 $4,014 Multi-Family Units $19381 $1,253 Mixed-Use Residential2 'Due to economic conditions,Federal.Way Public Schools is anticipating holding the impact fee for Single Family Units at the 2011 rate of$4,014 for 2013 instead of using the calculated rate of$4,172 2In anticipation of the City of Federal Way Council's changes to Ordinance No 95-249, which authorizes the collection of school impact fees. 26 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN STUDENT GENERATION NEW CONSTRUCTION IN PRIOR 5 YEARS Sin=ie Family Student Generation Number of Numberof Number of Number of Number of Elementary Middle School High School Total SirgleFiermlwi Multi•Femily Elementary Middle School HlghSchool Student Student Student Student DEVELOPMENT Dwellinip Students Students Students Factor Factor Factor Factor 12 Ming Court 1 5 5 3 03333 03333 02000 08666 12 Sunset Gardens if 9 0 1 08182 00000 00909 09091 (11)BngllonPark 19 1 4 3 05789 02105 Q1579 09473 (11 The 20 - 11 7 1 05500 03500 Q0500 09500 10)CreekscieLane 43 5 11 03721 01163 02558 07442 (10) rarde Vista 28 7 02143 02500 03214 07857 O9)Lakofa Crest 43 12 3 7 02791 00698 0.1628 05117 09 Tusoan 22- 7 5 3 03182 02273 0.1364 06819 OB Northlake Ridge IV 90 33 13 21 0 3667 01444 Q2333 07444 Co101gtree Park 41 16 9 7 0 3902 0 2195 0 1707 0 7804 Total Student Generatbm' 0.3795 01747 0.1988 0.7530 'Student Gene rat ion rate is based on totals MaI&Farally Student Generation Elementary Midde School I Hiah School I Total Auburn 0172 1 0 070 0 090 0 332 Issacluah 0 092 1 6 033 0 032 0157 Kent D 331 0 067 0124 0 522 Lake Washington 0 051 0 018 0 017 0 086 Average .162 0 0 66 0 274 27 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE School Site Acquisition Cost: Student Student Facility Cost/ Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 03795 M. 01620 SO $0 Middle School 0 1747 00470 SO $0 High School 485 $216,718 51 01988 00660 $4,093 S1,359 TOTAL $4,093 $1,359 School Construction Cost: Student Student %Perm Fsod Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total Sq Ft Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 95 82% 03795 01620 $0 $0 Middle School _ 94 76% 0 1747 0 0470 $0 $0 High School 96 53% $10,530,000 200 0 1988 0 0660 $10,104 $3,354 TOTAL $10,104 $3,354 Temporary Facility Cost: Student Student %Temp Fee Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total Sq Ft Cost Size SFR MFR SFR MFR Elemen`ry 418% 03795 01620 Middle School 5 24% --N- 0 1747 0 0470 High School 3 47% �� N 0 1988 00660 TOTAL $0 SO State Matching Credit Calculation: Student Student Construction Cost Sq Ft State Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Allocation/S Ft Stud"t Match SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary $188 55 �-- 03795 - 0 1620 $0 SO Middle School 01747 00470 $0 SO High School S188 55 130[:7 63 50% �� 0 1988 0 0660 $3,094 S 1,027 Total $3,094 $1,027 Tax Payment Credit Calculation SFR MFR Average Assessed Value (March 2012) $232,710 S77,926 Capital Bond Interest Rate(March 2012) 3 84% m 3 84% _ Net Present Value of Average Dwelling $1,902,611 �S637,114 Years Amortized ~� w 10 10 Property Tax Levy Rate ........ S 1 45.... S 1 45 Present Value of Revenue Stream $2,759 S924 Single Family Multi-Family Residences Residences Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost $ 4,093 $ 1,359 Perm anent Facility Cost $ 10,104 $ 3,354 Temporary Facility Cost $ - $ - State Match Credit $ (3,094) S (1,027) Tax Payment Credit $ (2,759) $ (924) Sub-Total S 8,343 S 2,762 50%Loc81 Share $ 4,172 S 1,381 alailated Muct Fee $ 4,172 $ 1,381 013 Impact Fee $ 4,014 $ 1 81 28 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The 2013 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document,based on the 2012 Capital Facilities Plan. The changes between the 2012 Plan and the 2013 Plan are listed below SECTION I-THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN The Six Year Finance Plan has been rolled forward to reflect 2013-2019 and adjusted for anticipated Federal Way High School construction schedule The plan is found on page 8 SECTION III - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION CAPACITY Elementary capacity includes space for All Day Kindergarten programs at every elementary school Changes to the Building Program Capacities calculation are found on page 15 PORTABLES The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page 20 STUDENT FORECAST The Student Forecast now covers 2013 through 2019 Enrollment history and projections are found on page 20 CAPACITY SUMMARY The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity Capacity Summaries are found on pages 22-25 IMPACT FEE CALCULATION-KING COUNTY CODE 21A The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors The adjustment made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 2012 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2013 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page 30 and 31. 29 r. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL.FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2012 TO 2013 STUDENT GL+ERATION FACTORS Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in student Generation factors between the 2012 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2013 Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age of the developments and the year placed in the survey The Student Generation worksheet is found on page 27. SCHOOL CONSTRUC770N COSTS The anticipated cost based on 2006 estimates for replacing Federal Way High is $81,000,000. The replacement will add 200 additional seats. The current capacity of Federal Way High is 1538 The addition of 200 seats will increase capacity by 13% Total Cost $81,000,000 x.13=$10,530,000 SCHOOL ACQUISITION COSTS The district purchased the Norman Center to house the Employment Transition Program and to allow for the expansion of the ECEAP program. The purchase and use of this site increased our high school capacity by 51 students Total Cost $23100,000/2=$11050,000 Cost perAcre $1,050,00014.85=$216,718 The astrict will use the above formulas created as a base for the 2013 Capital Facilities Plan. The capacity of Federal Way High may vary from year to year as programs are added or changed and construction cost may increase over time. 30 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2013 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2012 TO 2013 IMPACT FEE ItemFrom/To Comment Percent of Permanent Facilities 95 16%to 95.13% Report#3 OSPI Percent Temporary Facilities 4 84%to 4.87% Updated portable inventory Average Cost of Portable $199,832 to $185,012 Updated average of portables Classroom purchased and placed in 2011 Construction Cost Allocation $180 17 to $18855 Change effective July 2011 State Match 62.53%to 63.50% Change effective July 2012 Average Assessed Value SIR— Per Puget Sound Educational $257,849 to $232,710 Service District (ESD 121) MFR— $74,692 to $77,926 Capital Bond Interest Rate 4.91%to 3.84% Market Rate Property Tax Levy Rate $1.54 to $1.45 King County Treasury Division Single Family Student Yield Updated Housing Inventory Elementary 3315 to .3795 Middle School .1658 to .1747 High School 2095 to .1988 Multi-Family Student Yield Updated County-Wide Average Elementary .1480 to.162 Note• The last district multi family Middle School .0420 to.047 development, built in 2008, generates High School 0590 to.066 a higher student yield than the county- wide average Impact Fee SFR— For 2012&2013 the district has $4,461 to$4,172 chosen to retain the 2011 SF rate Proposed 2013 STR$4,014* 'Thin reflects the calculated 2011 SF rate MFR— MFR based on the updated calculation $1,253 to $1,381 31 GLOBAL END Each student will graduate with the skills and academic knowledge to succeed as a responsible, contributing member of a global society. STUDENT ACHEIVEMENT Each student at every grade level will perform at or above the state or district standard in all disciplines. Each student's progress shall be measured annually by academic growth. RESPONSIBILITY Each student will take responsibility for their academic success; exhibiting positive and ethical personal behaviors; treating others with respect, courtesy, and dignity. PARENT ENGAGEMENT Each student will benefit from the relationship each school will establish with each parent, guardian or advocate. Federal Way Public Schools yVay 33330 8t'Avenue S ruHic Schools Federal Way,Washington 98003 (253)945-2000 This document is published by the Business Services Department of the Federal Way Public Schools.May 2012 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAC 197-11-960 Environmental Checklist. Purpose of Checklist. The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43 21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: Tlus environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to detemune whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases,you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply"In addition,complete the Supplemental Sheet for nonproject actions(part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and"affected geographic area," respectively 2 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A BACKGROUND 1 Name of proposed project,if applicable- The adoption of a Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan by the Federal Way School District No. 210 for the purposes of planning for the District's facilities needs The King County, City of Federal Way, City of Kent and the City of Auburn's Comprehensive Plan will be amended to include the District's 2013 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Plan Element This project may also involve the amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the city of Des Moines to incorporate the Distncfs 2013 Capital Facilities Plan. 2. Name of applicant: Federal Way School District No. 210. 3 Address and phone number of applicant and contact person. Federal Way School District No. 210 33330 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253)945-2000 Contact Person. Ms Tanya Nascimento ` Enrollment and Demographics Telephone (253)945-2071 4. Date checklist prepared. May 11, 2012 5 Agency requesting checklist: Federal Way School District No. 210 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable) The Federal Way School District's 2013 Capital Facilities Plan is scheduled to be adopted by the District in June 2012. The Capital Facilities Plan will be forwarded to King County, the City of Federal Way, City of Kent and the City of Auburn for inclusion in each junsdiction's Comprehensive Plan. It will also be forwarded to the city of Des Moines for possible inclusion in this jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plans. The District will continue to update the Capital Facilities Plan annually. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review. 7 Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal?If yes,explain. 3 !'3 ' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The Capital Facilities Plan sets forth the capital improvement projects that the District is currently implementing. This includes construction of Federal Way HS Additionally the plan covers the purchase and siting of temporary facilities at various locations Non-instructional projects included in the plan will consolidate support services operations at a single location. This will include the construction of new facilities to house the Transportation, Maintenance and Nutrition Services departments. Current plans are for all the projects to be complete by 2015 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will undergo additional environmental review, when appropriate, as they are developed. 9 Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain Permits will be applied for with the appropriate jurisdiction for minor projects during the 2013 calendar year. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known The District anticipates that King County, the City of Federal Way, the City of Kent and the city of Auburn will adopt this Capital Facilities Plan into their Comprehensive Plan The city of Des Moines may also adopt this Capital Facilities Plan into the Capital Facilities Elements of their Comprehensive Plans (when issued). 11 Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your.proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description ) This is a non-project action. This proposal involves the adoption of the Federal,Way School District's 2013 Capital Facilities Plan for the purpose of planning the District's facilities needs. The District's Capital Facilities Plan will be incorporated into King County's, the City Federal Way's, the City of Kent's and the City of Auburn's Comprehensive Plans. It may also be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plans of the city of Des Moines The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review A copy of the Capital Facilities Plan may be viewed at the District's offices 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 12 Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans subnntted with any permit applications related to this checklist The Capital Facilities Plan will affect the Federal Way School District. The District includes an area of approximately 35 square miles. The City of Federal Way, parts of the cities of Kent, Des Moines and Auburn, parts of unincorporated King County, fall within the District's boundaries A detailed map of the District's bommdanes can be viewed at the District's offices 5 ENMONMENTAL CHECKLIST B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1 Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The Federal Way School District is comprised of a variety of topographic land forms and gradients Specific topographic characteristics of the sites at which the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan are located have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? Specific slope characteristics at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review c What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Specific soil types found at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate d Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Unstable soils may exist within the Federal Way School District. Specific soil limitations on individual project sites have been or will be identified at the time of project-level environmental review when appropriate. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed Indicate source of fill. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject, when appropriate, to project-specific environmental review and local approval at the time of proposal. Proposed grading projects, as well as the purpose, type, quantity, and source of any fill materials to be used have been or will be identified at that time f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction,or use? If so, generally describe It is possible that erosion could occur as a result of the construction projects currently proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan. The erosion impacts of the individual projects have been or will be evaluated on a site-specific basis at the time of project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Individual projects have been or will be subject to local approval processes 6 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECIMIST g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction(for example, asphalt or buildings?) The proposed renovation projects will require the construction of impervious surfaces The extent of any impervious cover constructed will vary with each capital facilities project included in the Capital Facilities Plan This issue has been or will be addressed during project- specific environmental review when appropriate h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any The erosion potential of the,projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and appropriate control measures have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Relevant erosion reduction and control requirements will be met 2. Air a What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known Various emissions, many construction-related, may result from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The air-quality impacts of each project have been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions b Are there any off-site sources of ermssions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any The individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review when appropriate and relevant local approval processes The District will be required to comply with all applicable air regulations and air permit requirements. Proposed measures specific to the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions 7 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into There is a network of surface water bodies within the Federal Way School District The surface water bodies that are in the immediate vicinity of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate When necessary, the surface water regimes and flow patterns have been or will be researched and incorporated into the designs of the individual projects 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require work near the surface waters located within the Federal Way School District. Applicable local approval requirements have been or will be satisfied. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material Information with respect to the placement or removal of fill and dredge material as a component of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Crave general description,purpose, and approximate quantities if known Any surface water withdrawals or diversions required in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project- specific environmental review when appropriate. S) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplam? If so, note location on the site plan Each project included in the Capital Facilities Plan, if located in a floodplain area, will be required to meet applicable local regulations for flood areas. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. 8 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Specific information regarding the discharge of waste materials that may be required as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project-specific environmental review when appropriate Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproj ect Actions b Ground: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to groundwater9 Give general description,purpose, and approximate quantities if known Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may impact groundwater resources The impact of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on groundwater resources has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ., agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of ammals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve The discharges of waste material that may take place in connection with the projects included in the Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review c Water Runoff(including storm water)• 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any(include quantities, if known) Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may have storm water runoff consequences Specific information regarding the storm water impacts of each project has been or will be provided during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local storm water regulations 9 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters9 If so, generally describe The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may result in the discharge of waste materials into ground or surface waters The specific impacts of each project on ground and surface waters have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate Each project is or will be subject to all applicable regulations regarding the discharge of waste materials into ground and surface waters Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. d Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any Specific measures to reduce or control runoff impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site- _ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree- fir, cedar,pine,other _ shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants cattail,buttercup,bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants water lily,eelgrass, milfoil,other other types of vegetation A variety of vegetative zones are located within the Federal Way School District Inventories of the vegetation located on the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate b What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require the removal or alteration of vegetation The specific impacts on vegetation of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. I.ist threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site The specific impacts to these species from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 10 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plans, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,if any- Measures to preserve or enhance vegetation at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local landscaping requirements. 5 Animals: a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds- hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other- mammals- deer,bear, elk,beaver,other fish: bass, salmon,trout,herring, shellfish, other An inventory of species that have been observed on or near the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. b List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site Inventories of threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on migration routes have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any Appropriate measures to preserve or enhance wildlife have been or will be deternuned during project-specific environmental review when appropriate r 11 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 6 Energy and Natural Resources: a What lands of energy (electric,natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed projecss energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The State Board of Education requires the completion of a life cycle cost analysis of all heating, lighting, and insulation systems before it will perrmt specific school projects to proceed The energy needs of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined at the time of specific engineering and site design planning when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions b Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on the solar potential of adjacent projects have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. What lands of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any d Energy conservation measures proposed in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be considered during project-specific environmental review when appropriate 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will comply with all current codes, standards, rules, and regulations. Individual projects have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review and local approval at the time they are developed when appropriate. 12 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example. traffic, equipment,operation,other)? A variety of noises from traffic, construction, residential, commercial and industrial areas exists within the Federal Way School District The specific noise sources that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site The District does not anticipate that the projects will create long-term increases in traffic- related or operations-related noise levels. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any The projected noise impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated and mitigated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. 8 Land and Shoreline Use: a What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? There are a variety of land uses within the Federal Way School District, including residential, commercial,industrial, institutional, utility, open space, recreational, etc b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe The project sites covered under the Capital Facilities Plan have not been used recently for agriculture c Describe any structures on the site The structures located on the proposed sites for the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified and described during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 13 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? The remodeling and renovation projects will require the demolishment of school structures The structures that will be demolished as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. e What is the current zoning classification of the site? The sites that are covered under the Capital Facilities Plan have a variety of zoning classifications under the applicable zoning codes. Site-specific zoning information has been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. f What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Inventories of the comprehensive plan designations for the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be completed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate g If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Shoreline master program designations of the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Any environmentally sensitive areas located on the sites of the projects included in the Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed proj ect9 The Federal Way School District currently serves approximately 22,200 students The student population is expected to increase to 23,000 by the year 2017 This projection has been adjusted to reflect the current econormc conditions The District employs approximately 3,200 people i Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Any displacement of people caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate However, it is not anticipated that the Capital Facilities Plan, or any of the projects contained therein, will displace any people. 14 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST k Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to project-specific environmental review and local approval when appropriate. Proposed mitigating measures will be proposed at that time, if necessary. 1 Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,if any The compatibility of the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan with existing uses and plans has been or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive plamung process and during project-specific environmental review when appropriate 9 Housing• a Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,middle, or low-income housing No housing units would be provided in connection with the completion of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. b Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle,or low-income housing. i It is not anticipated that the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will ehmmate any housing units. The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on existing housing have been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any Measures to reduce or control any housing impacts caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 10. Aesthetics: a What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas, what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed? The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate 15 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined during project-specific environmental review when appropriate c Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. Appropriate measures to reduce or control the aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined on a project-specific basis when appropriate. 11 Light and Glare: a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review b Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Off-site sources of light or glare that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate d Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any- Proposed measures to mitigate light and glare impacts have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 12 Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are a variety of formal and informal recreational facilities within the Federal Way School District. 16 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b Would.the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe The recreational impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, including proposed renovated school and support facilities, may enhance recreational opportunities and uses. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any Adverse recreational effects of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to mitigation dunng project-specific environmental review when appropriate A school site usually provides recreational facilities to the community in the form of play fields and gymnasiums. 13 Ihstonc and Cultural Preservation: a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe There are no known places or objects listed on, or proposed for such registers on the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The existence of historic and cultural resources on or next to the sites has been or will be addressed in more detail during project-specific environmental review when appropriate b Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site An inventory of historical sites at or near the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate c Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed on a project-specific basis when appropriate 14 Transportation: a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any The impact on public streets and highways of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 17 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b Is site currently served by public transit9 If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The relationship between the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and public transit has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? An inventory of parking spaces located at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and the impacts of specific projects on parking availability has been or will be conducted during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. d Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets,not including driveways? If so, generally describe(indicate whether public or private) The need for new streets or roads, or improvements to existing streets and roads has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation9 If so, generally describe Use of water, rail, or air transportation has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate f How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur The traffic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate g Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any The mitigation of traffic impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 15 Public Services a Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example fire protection,police protection,health care, schools, other)9 If so, generally describe The District does not anticipate that the projects identified in the Capital Facilities Plan will substantially increase the need for other public services b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any 18 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Remodeled/renovated school or facilities will be built with automatic security systems, fire alarms, smoke alarms,heat sensors, and sprinkler systems 16 Utilities: a. Circle utilities currently available at the site electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other Electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, and sanitary sewer utilities are available at the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan The types of utilities available at specific project sites have been or will be addressed in more detail during project- specific environmental review when appropriate. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Utility revisions and construction needs have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate I C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted May 11, 2012 19 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST D SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FORNONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented Respond briefly and in general terms. 1 How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emssions to air; production, storage,or release of toxic or hazardous substances, or production of noise9 To the extent the Capital Facilities Plan makes it more likely that school facilities will be constructed and/or renovated and remodeled, some of these environmental impacts will be more likely. Additional impermeable surfaces, such as roofs, parking lots, sidewalks, access roads, and playgrounds could increase storm water runoff, which could enter surface or ground waters. Heating systems, emergency generators, and other school equipment that is installed pursuant to the Capital Facilities Plan could result in air emissions. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan should not require the production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances, with the possible exception of the storage of diesel fuel or gasoline for emergency generating equipment. The District does not anticipate a significant increase in the production of noise from its facilities, although the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will increase the District's student capacities Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Proposed measures to mitigate any such increases described above have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate Storm water detention and runoff will meet applicable County and/or City requirements and may be subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permitting requirements Discharges to air will meet applicable air pollution control requirements. Fuel oil will be stored in accordance with local and state requirements. 2 How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The Capital Facilities Plan itself will have no impact on these elements of the environment These impacts have been or will be addressed in more detail during project-specific environmental review when appropriate The projects included in the Plan are not likely to generate severe impacts on fish or marine life. 20 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish,or marine life are Specific measures to protect and conserve plants, animals, and fish cannot be identified at this time Specific mitigation proposals have been or will be identified, however, during project- specific environmental review when appropriate. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources9 The construction of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will require the consumption of energy. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are The projects included in the.Capital Facilities Plan will be constructed in accordance with applicable energy efficiency standards. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The Capital Facilities Plan and individual projects contained therein should have no impact on these resources Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Updates of this Plan will be coordinated with King County and the cities of Federal Way, Kent, Des Moines, and Auburn as part of the Growth Management Act process, one of the purposes of which is to protect environmentally sensitive areas To the extent the District's facilities planning process is part of the overall growth management planning process,these resources are more likely to be protected 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existmg plant9 The Capital Facilities Plan will not have any impact on land or shoreline use that is incompatible with existing comprehensive plans, land use codes, or shoreline management plans The District does not anticipate that the Capital Facilities Plan or the projects contained therein will directly affect land and shoreline uses in the area served by the District. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are No measures to avoid or reduce land use impacts resulting from the Capital Facilities Plan or the projects contained therein are proposed at this time 21 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 6 How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create temporary increases in the Distncfs need for public services and utilities Upon the completion of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, however, the District does not anticipate that its need for public services and utilities will increase substantially beyond existing levels Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are No measures to reduce or respond to such demands are proposed at this time 7 Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment The Capital Facilities Plan will not conflict with any laws or requirements for the protection of the environment 22 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Issued with a 14 Day comment and appeals period Description of Proposal: This threshold determination analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the following actions, which are so closely related to each other that they are in effect a single action. 1 The adoption of the Federal Way Public Schools' 2013 Six Year Capital Facilities Plan by the Federal Way Public Schools for the purposes of planning for the facilities needs of the District 2 The amendment of the King County Comprehensive Plan by King County to include the Federal Way Public Schools' 2013 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the King County Comprehensive Plan. 3 The amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Federal Way, City of Kent and the City of Auburn to include the Federal Way Public Schools' 2013 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the City of Federal Way's, City of Kent's and the City of Auburn's Comprehensive Plan This proposal may also involve the amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Des Moines to incorporate the Federal Way Public Schools' 2013 Capital Facilities Plan into the Capital Facilities Element of the City of Des Moines' Comprehensive Plan Proponent: Federal Way Public Schools Location of the Proposal: The Federal Way Public Schools District includes an area of approximately 35 square miles Areas of the cities of Federal Way,Kent,Des Moines and Auburn fall within the District's boundaries, as do parts of unincorporated King County. Lead Agency: Federal Way Public Schools is the lead agency pursuant to WAC 197-11-926 The lead agency for this proposal has deterrmned that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse environmental impact on the environment An environmental impact statement(EIS) is not required under RCW 43 21C.030(2)(c) This decision was made after a review of the completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency This information is available to the public upon request This Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS)is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2) The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issue Comments must be submitted by 5 00 p m.,May 25, 2012. The responsible official will reconsider the DNS based on timely comments and may retain, modify,or, if significant adverse impacts are likely, withdraw the DNS If the DNS is retained, it will be final after the expiration of the comment deadline Responsible Official: Ms. Tanya Nascimento Enrollment and Demographics Federal Way Public Schools Telephone: (253) 945-2071 Address: 33330 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 You may appeal this determination in writing by 4 30 p.m,May 25, 2012 to Tanya Nascimento,Federal Way Public Schools, 33330 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Date of Issue May 11, 2012 Date Published: May 11,2012 2 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Sdiod District No. 210 - King County 33330 - 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-15 A RESOLUTION of the Board of Education of the Federal Way School District No. 210, to provide to the City of Kent the 2013 Capital Facilities Plan. WHEREAS, the Federal Way School District Board of Education hereby provides to the City of Kent the District's 2013 Capital Facilities Plan, documenting present and future school facility requirements of the District, and WHEREAS, the Plan contains all elements required by the Growth Management Act and City of Kent Ordinance No. 3260, which addresses concurrency, allows each school district to establish their own standards of service, and provides for future school impact fees. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Superintendent be authorized and directed to submit the adopted 2013 Capital Facilities Plan to the City of Kent. 77 this 1 day of June, 2012. Board Secretary Director Dir�L� Director Director SCHOOL DISTRICT ENGAGE• EDUCATE• EMPOWER June 13, 2012 �� v Charlene Anderson 15�Q12 Economic and Community Development ,�� F City of Kent �� ,�� Op� 400 W Gowe Street E� ,% OE Kent,WA 98032 GOO Dear Ms.Anderson, Enclosed you will find a copy of the Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan for 2012 through 2018. The Plan has been prepared and adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors on May 29,2012,in conformance with the Growth Management statutes of the State of Washington. Included in the Plan are the following; ❑ Six-Year Enrollment Projections ❑ Auburn School District Standard of Service ❑ The District's overall capacity of the 6-year period ❑ An inventory of existing facilities ❑ Impact Fee Computations ❑ District Capital Construction Plan The Auburn School District Board of Directors is requesting the plan be adopted by reference as part of the capital facilities element of the City of Kent's Comprehensive Plan and that the school impact fees be set in accordance with the plan for the 2013 fiscal year. The Auburn School District is also requesting a change in the fees for 2013. The calculated fee for single-family is $5,511.69, a decrease of$45.61; and the calculated fee for multi-family is $3,380.26, an increase of$1,075.04. I Also, enclosed are the requested SEPA checklist and DNS documents. Please advise if additional information is required or needed. Thank you for your assistance. I Si cer t el Ne D puty e ' end i usme and perations Copy to: Kip Herren, Superintendent,Auburn School District w/o enclosure Denise Stiffarm, K&L GATES LLP w/o enclosure Jeff Grose,Executive Director of Capital Projects w/o enclosure James P.Fu9ate Administration Budding•915 Fourth Street NE•Auburn,WA 98002-4499.253-931-4930 I i 1 1 J i � • 1 . .v t �,r,L a t L� U t U"_ 4 U J� v_x_ ��•'� S.G �r ..� .��. -. 101, 'fir 71 I ITT f� r Q Y YF G r�"x�[ •4 � �u'1 ra 6 0.:. O Q t. Or ,l I ! I, UUR SCHOOL DISTRICT ENGAGE • EDUCATE • EMPOWER i 915 Fourth Street NE Auburn, Washington 98002 L (253) 931-4900 Searing Students in: Unincorporated King County City of Auburn City of Algona City of Kent City of Pacific City of Black Diamond BOARD of DIRECTORS Lisa Connors Carol Seng Janice Nelson Ray Veriik l Anne Baunach Dr. Dennis Kip Herren, Superintendent Ii 1 I I I i i i i i i i Table of Contents Section I Executive Summary ....................... Page 1 Section 11 Enrollment Projections.....................Page 6 Section III Standard of Service........................ Page 8 Section IV Inventory of Facilities.......................Page 15 Section V Pupil Capacity................................Page 19 Section VI Capital Construction Plan.............. ..Page 22 Section VII Impact Fees.................................. Page 26 Section Vill Appendices................................... Page 30 Appendix A.1 -Student Enrollment Projections Page 31 Appendix A.2-Capital Facilities Plan Projections Page 45 Appendix A.3-Student Generation Survey Page 50 i 2 Aubum School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2012 through 2018 Section I Executive Summary Aubum School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 through 2018 1. Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan(the'Plan")has been prepared by the Auburn School District (the"District")as the District's principal planning document,in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2012. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District However,this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare Interim and periodic long-range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions,taking into account a longer or a shorter time period; other factors and trends in the use of facilities;and other needs of the District as may be required. However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and within the City of Auburn and City of Kent;the King County Council,the City of Auburn and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction's respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of Algona,Pacific and Black Diamond,these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act and the local ordinances,the Plan will be updated on an annual basis,and any changes in the fee schedule(s)adjusted accordingly. The Plan establishes the District's`standard of service"in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity,those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the District's speck needs. In general, the District's current standard provides that class size for grades K-2 should not exceed 25 students; class size for grades 3-4 should not exceed 27 students;class size for grade 5 should not exceed 30 students. When averaged over the six elementary grades,this computes to 26.5 students per classroom. Class size for grades 6-12 should not exceed 30 students,with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers. (See Section III for more spedfic information.) The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service and the existing Inventory of facilities Including transitional classrooms. The District's 2011-12 capacity was 13,725). The actual number of Individual students was 14,363 as of October 1,2011. (See Section V for more specific information.) The capital construction plan shown in Section VI addresses the additions and proposed modernization to the Distrid's existing facilities This provided for a new high school approved by the voters In February 2003 and opened in September 2005;and the addition of two new elementary schools approved by the voters in February 2005;with Lakeland Hills Elementary opening in the Fall of 2006 and Arthur Jacobsen Elementary opening in the Fall of 2007. The plan includes the construction of a new middle school and a new elementary school, as well as the acquisition of future school sites to accommodate growth. The new facilities are required to meet the projected student population increase to be generated from the large development areas within the Auburn School District Three areas that have significant impact on the school district are the Lakeland South,the Lea Hill,and the north Auburn valley areas of the district. 2 There are other pockets of development that impact the District as well. The City of Kent has an area of approximately 158 acres that was sold to developers in 2004. The economic downturn has slowed development in these areas,but recent new construction is beginning to pick back up. The district completed a comprehensive review of all district facilities and in October 2008 a Steering Committee made recommendations to the board for capital improvements to existing facilities and replacement of seven schools over the next ten years.These recommendations led to a capital improvements levy and a bond issue that was placed on the ballot in March 2009. Both ballot measures were not successful in March.The board determined to rerun only the capital improvements levy in November 2009,which the voters approved. In the Fail of 2011 the school board determined to move forward with the Auburn 1-Ngh School Modernization and Reconstruction Project and place before the voters in February of 2012. The bond issue was supported by the community at nearly 57%approval rate,but was short of the super majority requirement of 60%. In March of 2012 the school board determined to rerun the bond again in November of 2012. The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the fiscal impact incurred by a District experiencing growth and development. Section VII sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multi-family dwelling units. The student generation factors have been generated using the students who actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and mufti-family developments constructed in the last five years. The method of collecting the data is with the use of GIS mapping software,data from King County and Pierce County GIS;and to integrate the mapping with student data from the district's student data system. This method gives the District actual student generation numbers for each grade span for identified developments. This data is contained in Appendix A.3. 3 I ! Aubm school D1WCt No.4W CAMAL FACILITIES PLAN M2 ewough=18 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2011 Capital Facilities Plan that are a part of the 2012 Plan. The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference. Section I Executive Summary A. Updated to reflect new inMrmation within the Plan. B. Summary level list of changes from previous year Section ii Enrollment Projections Updated projections. See Appendices A.1 &A2. Section III StarKlard of Service A. Decrease of 2 structured learning classrooms at elementary level B. Increase of 1 Nativie American resource room at elementary level C. Increase oft full-day kindergarten classrooms at elementary level D. Increase of 1 structured learning classrooms at middle level E. Increase of 3 structured learning classrooms at high school level F. Decrease of 1 special education resource room at high school level Section IV Inventory of Facilities No change from 2011-12 to 2012-13. Section V Pupil Capacity No change from 2011-12 to 2012-13. 4 "m School District No.408 CAWAI-FACILMES PLAN .-i812through 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Section Vll Impact Fees CHANCES To IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2011 to 2012 CPF CPF DATA ELEMENTS 2011 2012 EXPLANATION Student Generation Factors Single Family Consistent with King County Ordinance 11621, Elementary 0.3130 0.2610 Student Generation Factors are calculated Mid School 0.1640 0.1300 by the school district based on district Sr.High 0.1650 0.1340 records of average actual student generation Multi-Family rates for new developments constructed Elementary 0.1240 0.1720 over the last five years. Mid School 0.0560 0.0700 Sr.High 0,5190 0.0900 School Construction Coasts Elementary $21,760,000 $21,760,000 Middle School $42,500,000 $42,500,000 Site Acquisition Costs Cost per acre $290,381 $326,827 Updated estimates on land costs Area Cost Allowance soackh Ir $183,78 $188.65 Updated to projected SPI schedule. Match%-State 58.67% 68.49% Updated to current SPI schedule. Match%-District 41.33% 41.61% Computed District Average AV Single Family $248,795 $223,057 Updated from March 2012 King County Dept of Assessments data. Multi-Family $67,821 $68,902 Updated from March 2012 King County Dept of Assessments data using weighted average. Debt Sery Tax Rate $0.93 $0.98 Current Fiscal Year GO Bond Int Rate 4.91% 3.84% Current Rate(Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-12) Section Vlll Appendices Appendix AA -Updated enrollment projections from October 1,2011 Appendix A.2-Updated enrolment projections with anticipated buildout schedule. Appendix A.3-Stuchi t Generation Survey March 2012 5 t i Aubum School District No. 408 Capita! Facilities Plan 2012 through 2018 i Section II Enrollment Projections i AWMm School DbWct No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 through 2018 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS The Auburn School District uses a modified cohort survival model to project future enrollment for all of the District's operations. Table 11.1 is an extract from the comprehensive projection model found in Appendix A.2 titled"CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections". This Table shows the anticipated enrollment for the next six years based on the previous 6 year history of the Distnct under the assumptions set forth in the comprehensive projections,Appendix A.1, and the projection for additional students generated from new developments in the district as shown in Appendix A.2. TABLE ASD ENROLLMENT 11.1 PROJECTIONS WAarah 2012 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-16 2015-16 2016-17t2l GRADE Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected ProjectedKDG 1029 1052 1078 1105 1137 11691 1068 1077 1104 1131 1163 11962 1097 1086 1098 1126 1157 11903 no 1112 1103 1117 1149 1181 4 1022 1033 1152 1145 1163 1196 1226 5 1 1018 1042 1066 1176 1174 1193 1223 K-5 6230 6402 6691 6800 69Q 7125 7306 6 1063 1021 1049 1064 1188 1187 1204 7 1032 1081 1043 1071 1091 1217 1213 8 1048 1046 1099 1062 1095 1116 1239 6-8 3141 3149 3191 3197 3374 3519 3655 9 1273 1260 1266 1322 1292 1329 1350 10 1170 1278 1269 1276 1337 1309 1343 11 1233 1146 1257 1250 1262 1325 1294 12 1 1316 1251 1167 1281 1279 1293 1352 9-12 4992 4934 4968 5127 5170 1 5256 5339 TOTALS 14,363 14,485 1 14,740 1 16,126 15,487 1 15,901 1 16,299 GRADES K-12 Actual Projected Projected Pro ected Projected Projected Projected K-5 w/K @ 1/2 5716 5876 6051 6247 6374 6541 6706 6-8 3141 3149 3191 3197 3374 3519 3655 9-12 4992 4934 4958 5127 5170 5256 5339 K-12 w/K @ 112 13,949 13,959 1 200 14,572 14,919 15,317 15,700 Note:The district is currently operating Full Day Kindergarten In eight schools and includes two state funded Full Day Kindergartens at two additional elementary schools. 7 i Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2012 through 2018 Section III Standard of Service Adtwm School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2812 Nrough 2018 STAMARD OF SERVICE The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by ling County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent indicate that each school district must establish a "Standard of Service"in order to ascertain the overall capacity to house its projected student population. The Superintendent of Pubic Instruction establishes square footage "capacity"guidelines for computing state funding support. The fundamental purpose of the SPI guidelines is to provide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching funds for school construction projects. By default these guidelines have been used to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population. The SPI guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, faciky configurations,emerging educational reform,or the dynamics of each student's educational program. The Auburn School District Standard of Service addresses those local considerations that require space in excess of the SPI guidelines. The effect on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation pattem. Conditions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without accompanying computations. OVERVIEW The Auburn School District operates fourteen elementary schools housing 6,230 students in grades K through 5. For Kindergarten students;687 of the 1,029 attend 112 days throughout the year and 5,201 students, grades 1 through 5,plus 340 kindergartners,attend on a full day basis. When converted to full time equivalents,the K-5 enrollment is 5,885.The four middle schools house 3,141 students in grades 6 through 8. The District operates three comprehensive senior high schools and one altemative high school,housing 4,992 students in grades 9 through 12. CLASS SIZE The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the student population. Specialists create additional space needs.Gass sizes are subject to collective bargaining. Charges to class size agreements can have significant impact on available space. The current pupiUteacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 26.5 students per teacher. Consistent with this staffing limit,room capacities are set at 26.5 students per room at grades K-5. At grades 6-12 the limit is set at 30 pupils per room. The SPI space allocation for each grade articulation level, less the computed reduction for the Auburn School District Standard of Service, determines the District's capacity to house projected pupil populations. These reductions are shown below by grade articulation level. ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING FOR DEVELOPAIIENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a structtued learning program for students with moderate to severe disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses eight classrooms to provide for 72 students. The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPI space guidelines. No loss of capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to total elementary population. ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR The Auburn School District operates an adaptive behavior program for students with behavior disabilities at the elementary school level.The program uses one classroom to provide for seven students. The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space allocations by one classroom. Lass of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 26.5 each = (27) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (27) 9 i Aubum School Dla d No.408 CAMAL FACIUTIEs PLAN 2012 throw 2010 STANDARD OF SERVICE SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Aubum School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities. Fourteen standard classrooms are required to house this program.The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space guidelines by seven standard classrooms. The loss of capacity is expected as growth In program is larger than the total elementary population. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 26.5 each = (186) i Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 moms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (186) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Aubum School District operates two resource rooms to support the education of Native American students at the elementary level. Two standard classrooms is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 26.5 each = (53) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (53) HEAD START The Aubum School District operates a Head Start program for approximately 114 youngsters in six sections of 1/2 day in length. The program Is housed at three elementary schools and utilizes three standard elementary classrooms and auxiliary office spaces. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 26.5 each = (80) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (80) EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Aubum School District operates a pre-school program for young children with disabilities below age five. This program Is housed at seven different elementary schools and currently uses 10 standard classrooms.The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 26.5 each = (265) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (265) READING LABS The Aubum School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional language arts instruction. These programs utliae ruin-standard classroom spaces if available in each elementary school. Four elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available,thus they are housed in a standard classroom.The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 26.5 each= (106) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (106) 10 Fahum School Diabict No.4os CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2612 through 2018 STANDARD OF SERVICE MUSIC ROOMS The district elementary music programs require one acoustically modified Classroom at each elementary school for musio instruction. The housing requirements are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 26.5 each= (371) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (371) ENGLISHASA SECOND LANGUAGE PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the elementary school level for students learning English as a second language. This program requires fourteen standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 26.5 each= (371) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (371) SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for seven highly impacted elementary schools. This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade level and do not receive other services. This program requires eight standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 26.5 each= (212) Loss of Temporary Cape*0 rooms @ 26.5 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (212) ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIAUST PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a leaming specialist program to increase literacy skills for first and second graders. This program model has been created from the 1-728 funds and currently has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms,as well as pulling out students into designated classrooms. The district is uttil2ing classrooms at all fourteen elementary schools. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 26.5 each= (371) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (371) FULL DAY KINDERGARTEN The Auburn School District provides Full-Day IGndergarten programs to Increase academic skills for kindergarten students. This program model has been created from tuition,Title I funds and currently there are two schools receiving state funding for 2011-12 school year. The district is utill2ing 16 classrooms at eight of the fourteen elementary schools. Housing requirements exceed the OSPI space guidelines for this program by seven classrooms. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 26.5 each= (212) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (212) 11 i Audun Sdod District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2812 through 2018 STAMDARD OF SERVICE MIDDLE SCHOOLS SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level. This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific disabilities. Eight classrooms are required at the middle school level to provide for approximately 316 students. The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the SPI space guidelines. ADAPTIVE BEHAWOR SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior diabiNties. The program Is housed at one of the middle schools and uses one classroom. The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPI space allocations. STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates five structured learning classrooms at the middle school level for students with moderate to severe disabilities and one developmentally disabled classroom for students with profound disabilities. Three of the five classrooms for this program are provided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 26.6 each= (80) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.6 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (80) MIDDLE SCHOOL COMPUTER LASS The Auburn School District operates a minimum of one computer lab at each middle school.This program utilizes a standard classroom per middle school.The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each= (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 moms @ 30 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) j ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE The Aubum School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for students learning English as a second language. This program requires four standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each= (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes elective options in special interest areas.-Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 950A utilization of all available teaching stations. SPI Report#3 dated 12/14111 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the mid-level facilities. The utilization pattern remits In a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each= (240) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (240) 12 Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACLMES PLAN 2012 dvough 2018 STANDARD OF SERVICE SENOR HIGH SCHOOLS SENIOR HIGH COAFVTER LABS The Auburn School District operates two computer labs at each of the senior high schools.This program utilizes two standard classrooms at comprehensive high schools and one at West Auburn. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 30 each= (210) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (210) ENGUSH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at three comprehensive high schools for students learning English as a second language. This program requires three standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 30 each= (90) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (90) ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR SPECIAL EDLICA77ON The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior diabilities. The program is housed at one of the high schools and uses one classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 rooms @ 30 each= (30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (30) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates nine structured learning center classrooms for students with moderate to severe disabilities. This program requires five standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 30 each= (150) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (150) SPECIAL EDUCA77ON RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities. The current high school program requires 10 classrooms to provide program to meet educational needs of the students. The SPI space guidelines provide for one of the 10 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity g rooms @ 30 each= (270) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (270) 13 Aidw school District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 through 2010 STANDARD OF SERVICE PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center.The SPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity. This space was not intended for nor is it usable for classroom instruction. It was constructed to provide a community center for the perfuming arts. Using SPI capacity guidelines,25,000 square feet computes to 208 unhoused students or 8.33 dassrooms. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8.33 rooms @ 30 each = (250) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous elective options in special Interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95%utilization of all available teaching stations.There are 185 teaching stations available in the senior high facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 10 teaching stations. i Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 30 each= (300) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (300) STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS ELEMENTARY Loss of Permanent Capacity= (2,253) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity toss (2,253) MIDDLE SCHOOL Loss of Permanent Capacity= (560) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (560) SENIOR HIGH Loss of Permanent Capacity= (1,300) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,300) TOTAL Loss of Permanent Capacity= (4,112) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (4,112) 14 ' I I i Aubum School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2012 through 2018 Section IV Inventory of Facilities Auburn Sdwd Mairiat No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 through 2018 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES Table IV.1 shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OSPI rated capacities. Table IV.2 shows the number and location of each portable unit by school. The district uses relocatable facilities to: 1. provide interim housing in school attendance dress uniquely impacted by increasing school populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting. 2. make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique student needs,and 3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim,stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on existing physical plants. Core facilities(i.e.gymnasiums,restrooms,kitchens,labs,lockers,libraries,etc.)are not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable classrooms. l Table PermanentFacilides District School Facilities 1V.1 Q OSPI Rated Capaoity (December 2011) Buildft CaPadty Acres Address Elements schools Washin on Elementary 486 5.40 20 E Street Northeast,Auburn WA,98002 Terminal Park Momentary 408 6.70 1101 D Street Southeast,Auburn WA,98002 Dick Scobee Elementary 477 10.50 1031 14th Street Northeast,Auburn WA,98002 Pioneer Elementary 441 &30 2301 M Street Southeast,Auburn WA,98002 Chinook Elerawtary 440 8.75 3502 Auburn Way South Auburn WA,98092 Lea bill Elementary 450 10.00 30908 124th Avenue Southeast Auburn WA,98092 Gildo Rey Elementary 551 10.00 1005 37th Street Soutbeas4 Auburn WA 98002 EISOS Heights Elem. 456 8.09 5602 South 316th,Auburn WA,98001 Al ac Elementary 497 10.60 310 Milwaukee Boulevard North,Pacific WA,98047 Lake View Elementary 559 16.40 16401 Southeast 318th Street,Auburn WA,98092 Hazelwood Elementary 580 12.67 11815 Southeast 304th Street,Auburn WA 98092 Ilalko Elementary 585 12.00 301 Oravetz Place Southeast,Auburn WA,98092 Lakeland Hills Elementmy 594 12.00 1 1020E re Way SE,Auburn WA,98092 Arthur Jacobsen Elemen 614 10.00 29205 13 Street Auburn WA,98092 ELEM CAPACITY 7,138 Middle Schools Cascade Middle School 829 1730 1015 24th StredNortheasi, Auburn WA 98002 013rmpic Middle School 921 17.40 1825 K Street Sotrtheast,Auburn WA,98002 Rainier Middle School 843 26.33 30620116th Avenue Southeast,Auburn WA,98092 Mt.Baker Middle School 837 30.88 620 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA,98002 MS CAPACITY 3,430 Slower High schools West Auburn High School 233 5.10 1401 West Main Street Auburn WA,98001 Auburn Senior High 2,101 18.60 800 Fourth Street Northeast,Auburn WA,98002 Auburn Riverside US 1,387 33.00 501 Oravetz Road,Auburn WA,98092 Auburn Mountainview HE 1,443 40.00 28900 124m Ave SE,Auburn WA,98092 SH CAPACITY 5,164 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 15,732 16 ,&- EA lqm Raft PROF 'All en gm itgw�Is Wi a f; WAI =4wTt-f' e. 11, RIII toe MEMO IN R'1 ME" ,als. 0 90 ........... o fllr�l yn u-acmieL p Ml lip y r Auburn Srdwol District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 ttrma¢h 2018 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES TABLE TEMPORARYIRELOCATA13LE IV.2 FACILITIES INVENTORY March 2012 Elementa location 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Terminal Park 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Dick 5cobee 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Pioneer 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Chinook 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Lea Hill 5 5 2 2 2 2 2 Giido Rey 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Evergreen Heights 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 Alpac 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Lake View 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Hazelwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 lialko 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Lakeland Hills Elementary 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 rthurJaoobsen Elementary 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 TOTAL UNITS 32 32 33 33 33 33 33 TOTAL CAPACITY 84B 848 875 875 875 875 875 Middle School Location 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 Cascade 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 Olympic 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 Rainier 5 5 7 7 8 8 8 Mt.Baker 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 TOTAL UNITS 13 13 15 19 20 20 20 TOTAL CAPACITY 390 390 460 670 600 600 600 Sr.High School Location 20114 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 West Auburn 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 Auburn High School 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Auburn High School-'TAP 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Auburn Riverside 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 Auburn Mountainview 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 26 26 26 27 27 27 27 TOTAL CAPACITY 780 780 780 810 810 810 810 *TAP-Transition Assistance Program for 18-21 year old students with special needs. CONSMD TOTAL UNITS 71 71 74 79 BO 80 80 COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY 2,01$ 018 2,105 5 2,285 2,285 2,285 18 Aubum School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2012 through 2018 Section V Pupil Capacity Aubum School Distdct 140.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 through 2018 "PUPIL CAPACITY While the Auburn School District uses the SPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from which to determine space needs,the Districts educational program requires more space than that provided for under the formula. This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in Section III,Standard of Service. The Districts capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional space to house its programs. Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new unfunded facilities.The combined effect of these adjustments Is shown on Une B in Tables V.1 and V.2 below. Table V.1 shows the Disticts capacity with relocatable units Included and Table V.2 without these units. Table VA Capacity WITH relocatables 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 A. SPI Capacity 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,532 A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 550 1 A.2 SPI Capacity-New MS 800 B. Capacity Adjustments 1954 2,094 2094 2008 1,858 1,828 1,828 C. Net Capacity 13,778 13,638 13,638 13,725 13,875 14,705 15,255 i D. ASD Enrollment 14,3W 14,485 14,740 15,125 15,487 15,901 16,229 1 E. ASDSurplus(Deflclt (585) (847) (1,102) (1,401) (1,613) (1,197) (975) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Include Relocatable 2,018 2,018 2,018 2,105 2,256 2,286 2,285 y Exclude SOS 14 3,972 4112 4,112 4,112 4,112 4,112 4,112 Total Adjustments (1,954) (2,094) (2,094) (2,008) (1,858) (1,828) (1,828) Table V.2 Capacity WITHOUT relocallables 20 1-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 A. SPI Capacity 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,732 15,732 15,732 16,532 A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 550 J/ A.2 SPI Capacity-New MS 800 B. Capacity Adjustments 3,972 4,112 4,112 4,112 4,112 4,112 4,112 C. NetCapadty 11,760 11,620 11,620 11,620 11,620 12,420 12,970 D. ASD Enrollment 14,363 14,485 14,740 15,125 15,487 15,901 16,229 E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (2,603) (2,865) (3,120) (3,505) (3,867) (3,481) (3,259) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS 2/ Exclude SOS 14 (3,972) 4,112 4,112 4,112 4,112 4,112 4,112 11 Total Adjustments (3,072) (4,112) (4,112) (4,112) (4,112) (4,112) (4,112) I/New facilities shown In 2016-17 and 2017-18 are not funded under the current Capital Facilities Plan. 21 The Standard of Service represents 26.38%of SPI capacity. When new facilities are added the Standard of Service computations are decreased to 23.35%of SPI capacity. 3J Students beyond the capacity are accomodated in other spaces(commons,library,theater,shared teaching space). 20 Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAIN 2012 through 2018 PERMANENT FACILITIES PUPIL CAPACITY SPI Rated Capacky March 2012 A. Elementary Schools Building 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2016-16 2016-17 2017-18 Washington 486 486 486 486 486 4B6 486 Terminal Park 408 408 408 408 408 408 408 Dick Scobse 477 477 477 477 477 477 477 Pioneer 441 441 441 441 441 441 441 Chinook 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 Lea Hill 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 Gildo Rey 651 551 561 551 551 551 551 Evergreen Heights 456 456 456 456 456 456 456 Alpac 497 497 497 497 497 497 497 Lake View 659 559 559 559 559 559 559 Hazelwood 580 580 680 680 580 580 580 Ilaiko 585 585 585 585 585 585 585 Lakeland Hills 594 694 694 694 594 594 594 Arthur Jacobsen 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 lElarnentary#16 585 ELEM CAPACITY 7,138 7,138 7,13E 7138 7,138 7,138 7,723 B Middle Schools Building 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 Cascade 829 829 829 829 829 829 829 Olympic 921 921 921 921 921 921 921 Rainier 843 843 843 843 843 843 843 Mt Baker 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 Middle School#5 800 800 MS CAPACITY 3430 3,430 1 3,430 3,430 1 3,430 4,230 4,230 C. Senior High Schools Builds 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 West Auburn 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 Auburn 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 Auburn Riverside 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 Auburn Mountainview 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 SH CAPACITY 5164 5164 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 COMBINED CAPACITY 1 15,732 1 15,732 1 15,732 1 15,732 1 15,732 1 16,532 17,117 21 i i i i Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2012 through 2018 Section VI Capital Construction Plan Aubum School DaMot No.408 CAPIMAL FACILITIES PLAN 2812 Rough 2018 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974 with the formation of a community wide citizens committee. The result of this committee's work was published in the document titled'Guidelines for Development.' In 1985 the Board formed a second Ad Hoc citizens committee to pick up from the work of the first and address the needs of the District for subsequent years.The work of this committee was published in the document titled 'Directions for the Nineties.' In 1995 the Board commissioned a third Ad Hoc citizens committee to make recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and physical facilities. The committee recommendations are published in the document titled 'Education Into The Twenty-First Century--A Community Involved.' i The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop plans for the implementation, funding, and deployment of technology throughout the District's programs. The 1996 Bond proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate I technological applications. The 1998 Capital Levy provided funding to further deploy technology j at a level sufficient to support program requirements in every classroom and department. In 2005 a replacement technology levy was approved to continue to support technology across all facets of the District's teaching, learning and operations. i In addition to the technology needs of the District,the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District i must prepare for continued student enrollment growth. As stated in their report, "the District j must pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible." The Ad Hoc recommendation Included commentary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent rates of assessment. A proposition was approved by the voters an April 28, 1998 that provided $8,000,000 over six years to address some of the technology needs of the District; and $5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire school sites. During the 1997-98 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Dieringer School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population from an area that Includes a large development known as Lakeland South. Lakeland South at that time was immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the Auburn School District. On June 16, 1998 the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Dieringer Boards of Directors. On June 22, 1998 the Auburn School Board adopted Resolution No. 933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District In accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 23, 1998 the Dieringer School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 24-97-98 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from Dieringer to Auburn containing most of the Lakeland South development and certain other undeveloped properties. In April of 2002,the Board formed a fah citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two items and make recommendations to the board in the Fall of 2002; a. A review of the conclusion and recommendations of 1985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees related to accommodating high school enrollment growth. This included the review of possible financing plans for new facilities. b. Develop recommendations for accommodating high school enrollment growth for the next 10 years if a new senior high school is not built. 23 Aubwn school oiftiot No.408 i CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 through W ll CAMAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN This committee recommended the board place the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in February 2003. The February election approved the new high school at 68.71%yes votes. The school opened in the Fall of 2005. In the Fall of 2003 the school board directed the administration to begin the planning and design for Elementary#13 and Elementary#14. In the Fall of 2004,the Auburn School Board passed Resolution No. 1054 to place two elementary schools on the ballot in February 2005. The voters approved the ballot measure in February of 2005 at 64.72%. Lakeland Hills Elementary (Elementary#13)opened in the Fail of 2006. Arthur Jacobsen Elementary(Elementary#14)is located in the Lea Hill.ares on a 10 acre site and opened in the Fall of 2007. These two elementary schools were built to accommodate the housing growth in Lakeland Hills and Lea Hill areas of the school district. In the 2004-05 school year,the Board convened a sixth Citizen's Ad Hoc committee to again study and make recommendations about the future impacts in the District. One of the areas of study was the need for New Facilities and Modernization. The committee made a number of recommendations including school size, the need for a new middle school, and to begin a capital Improvements program to modernize or replace facilities based upon criterion. During the 2005-06 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Kent School Boardeto make recommendations on how best to serve the school population that will come from an area that includes a number of projected developments in the north Auburn valley. On May 17,2006 the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Kent Boards of Directors. On June 14, 2006 the Kent School Board adopted Resolution No. 1225 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 26,2006 the Auburn School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 1073 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from the Kent School District to the Auburn School District effective September 29, 2006. In October of 2008, after two years of review and study,a Steering Committee made recommendations to the school board regarding the capital Improvements program to modemize or replace facilities as recommended by the 2004-05 Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee. These recommendations, based on specific criteria, led to the school board placing a school improvement bond and capital improvements levy on the ballot in March 2009. Voters did not approve either measure that would have updated 24 facilities and replaced three aging schools. The board decided to place only a six-year Capital Levy on the ballot in November of 2009, which passed at 55.17%. The levy will fund $46.4 million of needed improvement projects at 24 sites over the next seven school years. Planning for the replacement of aging schools has started with educational specifications and schematic design process beginning in 2010. A future bond issue will be necessary to fund these projects. The Special Education Transition Facility opened in February of 2010. This facility is designed for students with dlaabliities that are 18 to 21 years old. The school district aNuired a site for a future middle school in 2009 and will need to consider possibilities for a site for elementary school#15. 24 I Autnma School District No.408 CAPITAL FACL TIES PLAN 2812 through 2018 CAPITAL.CONSTRUCTION PLAN The District is projecting 1930 additional students within the six-year period including the Lakeland, Lea Hill, and north Auburn valley areas. This increase in student population will require the acquisition of new middle school and new elementary school sites and construction of a middle school and elementary school during the six-year window. Based upon the District's capacity data and enrollment projections, as well as the student generation data included in Appendix A.3,the District has determined that approximately eighty- six percent of the capacity improvements are necessary to serve the students generated from new development,with the remaining additional capacity required to address existing need. The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years. The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population and passage of bond Issues and/or capital improvement levies. 2012-18 Capital Constiruction Plan March 2012 Projected Fund Project Timelines Project Funded cost Source 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 All Facilities- 2006 Technology Yes $12,000,000 6 Year XX Modemization cap LeVy, Portables Yes $1,200,000 Impact XX XX XX XX XX XX 1/ Property Purchase Impact New Elementary No $3,500,000 Fees XX XX XX Multiple Facility Yes $46,400,000 Capital Xx XX XX XX XX XX Improvements Levy Band XX XX XX 11 Middle School#5 No $42,500,000 impact Fee plan const open Bond XX XX XX J Elements #15 No $21,750,000 Impact Fee plan const open AHS 1 Modernization No $110,000 Bond Issue KX XX XX plan olant XX t XX open V These funds may be secured through local bond Issues,sale of real property,Impact fees,and state matddng funds. The Di currently Is not eligible for state assistance at the elementary school level for new construction. The district is eligible for state matching funds for modernization 25 f Aubum School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2012 through 2018 Section VII Impact Fees p pp a�D Op C 1p4p SCEE a N O Gp C O O ig LL N S ! LL m$ G c+7 O U. m O aD v 7iT»da U 49 g 90 g "°4 �► g °+ y g 8 Aq`. �y $ �iN O+ A V Fes. w apD� Hi o n U nOOA ( mmOis � �a�yy gMqppi V mifl � � pwp N W 9P Yf 9)9}9} —loss oo _ N � ` LL r o O m IL 1` O 8 NA000 O o C . V' T O O LL en- O O j 000 Cj C C C Gj- C O O v C O C U. g {L 0 !L g IL mz U' LL FS g LL `� 53ie3 y V' u- 3 � MU— mAi ga o00 000 � 000 Z W 00 N �vJyyy�y �] � N 'gym W ILL o LLLL c`S r aU P oc ma � o � ,nm LL � N ig3IRLN wCc 91 L° EoEm o -E m mmmm �7 J gLL dod r000 aog ,�i �i Q N x x V C o ,a x � T o O LaaLcc O g O O LL �,y N 9i O O � N O m O C V stow (A uS Cm6 � SO /ANC Vl o m � � Y/ LL LL x Z $ x x a Uo m y o o pp p p LL U Iq N O O p C O O O y OD W T 1`� M T yap �J$,. V Nd yOpj U. LL U �cs 09 0 x � � m K mto V! � chi X «J) mi x - L mIc U fA a 6 � LLv,/ co U2 (� x E wain u. in Li � � . � � 2 ■ _ $ � § a k s \ � ) 22 - ` 2LU E b \ LL k I \ § k ) I § | � ■ 2 a2 � 2 ) § » ■ # ® co {#'04, AJa ■ $ 7 � _ $f§7� 't:NWs afit - ! k ■ z cl # % ism ■ k $ _ as _ 1216 f ■ k I $$ k � �@ E ! a � $ { ILf § \ 2 ) 222kA ) § } � � m ! ! £ } ) uw � ■ ; i op T mT pp 6 d N pip co m �j V W co CD r 4 52 � o c S o m� ^^ � � �ppe'�iA' � QN ao � a � Ln F L C O M O N m � m y N co 1fl y O a} n rp ,gg£1 r 0 N T eNq m m�, a N 'S N (i! Y o � ` � r � 2m � m $ yoga R yd, N y SN �. �- 41 W to �p Qp N m � ro '-N N q in Y N A y r T M a J ' O t, o o $ g�a o " m W � oQ � � o ogN corN ' co � m � r � Na �iri �� v m w ,A iwmZ y , aw fb. Q ul T pOp N L LO m ':W N w y' It7 Y N f+l O N N feel N to w ; uu r T y aV y y y y C14m commg Ny r W W q1 t'�a yip 3 g � YNNN Qg E u� d ie ' c m � ® mgg a g Q Ul t�5 c age y y° :9 s U c � 16 0 49 ® N m a$[$ ALL p, � a{ply: x BSc} V tEa � [L cr Q co �I oil Z o oC7 f�1 � Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2012 through 2018 I i Section VIII Appendix Appendix A.1 -Student Enrollment Projections Appendix A.2-CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections Appendix A.3-Student Generation Survey Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections i Ali 1F I Auburn School District#408 Student Enrollment Projections October 2011 In aductton The projective techniques give some consideration to historical and current data as a basis for forecasting the flrtum In addition,the`projector' must make certain assumptions about the operant variables within the data being used. These assumptions are 5udgmental"by definition. Forecasting i can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future,or from the known to the unknown. The attached tabular data reviews the history of student enrollment,sets out some quantitative assumptions,and provides projections based on these numerical factors. i The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological,psychological,economic, and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection. The logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today,and will be in the future. It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over thirteen years and six years respectively. The results provide a trend,which reflects a long(13-year)and a short (6-year)base from which to extrapolate. j Two methods of estimating the number of kindergarten students have been used. The fast uses the average increase or decrease over the past 13 and 6-year time frame and adds it to each succeeding year. The second derives what the average percentage Auburn kindergartners have been of live births in King County for the past 5 years and uses this to project the subsequent four years. The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact. This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections. Monitoring deviation is critical to the viability and credibility of the projections derived by these techniques. Tables Table 1-Thirteen Year Histary ofO-daber 1 Enrollments-page 3 The data shown in this table is the baseline information used to project future enrollment This data shows the past record of enrollment in the district on October 1 of each year. Table 2-Historical Factors Used in Proiecdons-page 4 This table shows the three basic factors derived from the data in Table 1. These factors have been used in the subsequent projections. The three factors are: 1. Factor 1-Average Pupil Change Between Grade Levels This factor is sometimes referred to as the"holding power"or"cohort survival" It is a measure of the number of pupils gained or lost as they move from one grade level to the next 2. Factor 2 -Average Pupil Change by Grade Level This factor is the average change at each grade level over the 13 or 6-year period. 3. Factor 3-Auburn School District Kindergarten Enrollment as a Function of King County Live Births. This factor calculates what percent each kindergarten class was of the King County live births in the 5 previous years. From this information has been extrapolated the kindergarten pupils expected for the next 4 years. 1 Table 3—&*g(O yodels—pages 5-13 This set of tables nti7=the above mentioned variables and generates several projections.The models are explained briefly below ❑ Table 3.13(pg 5)—shows a projection based on the 13-year average gain in kindergarten (Factor 2)and the 13-year average change between grade levels(Factor 1). The data is shown for the district as a whole. o Table 3.6(pg 5)—shows a projection using the same scheme as Table 3.13 except it shortens the historical to only the most recent 6 years. a Table 3.13A and 3.6A(pg 6)—uses the same factors above except Factor 3 is substituted for Factor 2. The kindergarten rates are derived from the King County live bu the instead of the average gain. i ❑ Tables 3E.13,3E.6,3E.13A,3E.6A(pg 7)—breaks out the K-5 grades from the district i projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. a Tables 3MS.13,3MS.6,3MS.13A,3MS.6A(pg 8)—breaks out the 6-8 grades from the district prod action. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. a Tables 3SH.13,3SH.6,3SH.13A,3SH.6A(pg 9)—breaks out the 9-12 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Table 4(pg 10)—Collects the four projection models by grade group for ease of comparison. ❑ Table 5(pgs 11-13)—shows how well each projection model performed when compared with actual enrollments. Data is provided in both umber and percent formats for the past 13 years. Summary This year we had the third consecutive year of decline in student enrollment of 119 students.The loss of those students changes our historical average gain in students.Over the past 6 years the gain is now .33%annually down from.97%;that equates to 46 students down from 136 in prior projections. Using the 13 year model,the average gain has dropped from.92%to.81%and equates to 109 students annually down from 122 students in prior year. Using the cohort survival models,the data below is a summary of the range of variation between the four models. This data can be used for planning for future needs of the district. The models show changes in the next six years: ■ Elementary level shows increase ranging from 496 to 657. (page 7) ■ Middle School level shows increase ranging from 310 to 352.(page 8) ■ High School level shows increases ranging from 5 to 13.(page 9) The models show these changes looking forward thirteen years: ■ Elementary level shows increase ranging from 1287 to 1419.(page 7) ■ Middle School level shows incase ranging from 502 to 625. (page 8) ■ High School level shows increase ranging iinrn 582 to 625.(page 9) This data does not thctor new developments that are currently under construction or in the planning stages- 2 N I� t mnt`y °D $ Mam � m . ,, � QQOM m,� vno � �jr OOO m O O N +n- M P Q' N m � lr+l W ir'1N 03 V• M 4rrr rNr rrrf' P PPr TOr O,�. A', T POmmpT Q'm 'r p® N mmm Q$ {�r� ",1j O Npm O! t0 mO.7t MN M rO T r 3O RR "' r OO N N 1 � �`I N � 001 W mQ d000boo ;` P1 Nr P P r P r P r P P r P P r P O r M m n t(� m M N M M V lutF ,Q Fe �Np n. Im0 N N f0 N pp� T C N r a0 M op p AOM N M to I� M ID m N N M IA M Z1 mam �p pN a a P N m Np1 � tDr Nt6O �m W MN anDOm O 0 m a v p + p O CC j� p ..p{ 0m f O P N O N N M N O ObNO Or �' m Mm n M 1D MN M m Q W mm to nxm n�i+sn a� � y�q � ,a r.� a_ Of rmM non oM rP mn ooaMi:MMc3 W ''s ^ °°� c4im � �imm � N Mo0 0 0 o cQa- g n N N r N Y f N 000 wo 7 0tp LU pp (�f � Q O G O q � 0�O O M Q M � � � � m p O � pp� r r 0 Q N a0 c O W � N 10 n M 1t/ m M N M W M J . g, iIvvyy n , [a N 10 m N Q It! M N M m M m P 'V4 N m � m mpg .pM- � c W � n ,� O co t� N ^ r C M N M Q M P Q v N a X _ P m � o : �NI�0 " aalo � mm � r � m mnm NMm m p• q N O Y 0 T p t� Yp pp m tq M m �t3h O r N m U tV 111 m N C Y1 M N M Q m rr T- No M m m M m t�. p m e O� m Q J 4 M OOi Ol Ol O O' O fVa Ol O N W m N VV IW Ml N g 42 O P Q O r a' n �1{{10 M a� ®• v N �0 pmpmpp mm to r m M M s O N r O n to OQ1 m 0 0 0 0 V y O O G alj Q O T O O O Oj V 00 �j O m N N m M N M Q M CM 35 m a � o � � ssa � a �S �m � � I Ewa AM $ 00 0aN m qv 0 N P M QM D a s M N Q N M m� emt � tto MOIt1 Nrt+l vM (Wmp P p N m� N m m M m m to W m m F pr M Q mmnm � � N mQC9 e= t l t t t t t l t l Y F, � YYY rrr mnn mp N r r r < 0 N O m So �e� om '. � � n � ¢m a a ? x� xexxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx m mm m ono < M MMmW npm� v myTy a ny< t<� m (NW� aZ m v m V; anG tMM OR Rn S0 � m03w rICIO C4 iQ In Y � § W a -t V' Y Y7 V' 7Y V' K V' vv MM M RMMM cdq V 44177Q R? O ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ Q� Jy ,'m2 T tL � O WHO N a ¢ y V v S 6 m O m m N n p M m m N N W < m W tN+! o N M N ([}] O < O m O� 1Wp {my ® pry r P {epp N (per (rV tp A N Amy m Q m 0� �[ m m m m lQ m m W Ol W Ol Ol m W m 00 m m W O� m m v P I Oq}q}uu Z W abmfR+J W � � SN W W w a�0 abmO m9 � 09 nff NO � fDOOSOaMONr rA m O � m O O O J M C6 P1 Fr r ad m mP W MI N N N N M O 1f1 uiN V r Z.2 M < r r r < N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Q S2 t LU I.- U. � O < N R ® M m A Or M n W W O o L Omm � qW� � ala7 � nm5oI 47 aD m W W O W W O�i O G O C O O o m e00 m aC3111 W— My— — --- Qp-------- _---- o W O LL � QQ {jm OMml� NP LSD 10 OWk W m10 M� N�)V q 'ItC NOM co om'! •I g v v� Pmvvera�'vurr3viv3`uui�u�d'�c�radmnmrnm �FFnAnr:AnFmmccauadi 3 to O N1 m < m m V Ol O M M m m T M m m m {h - a0 10 W m m N < < W n F m K d I-P I nP�Pci'coMviernuiaioarofvvvavv d ui �cimmau.om WaidPPP « Tr« rrrrrr r rrr < R J y W M 0 er p r M V m M m W O do m m N n A m T p O N 0 V U JQQ �j ymYm � � NSS < Mn1�1f1O L9 � � � m � p � < omn M n m O m r YC! F QQ A r �p m �p}p �I m pm p m W Mop W - - m - - — WOl W mOIO W W W OImS SS QOmi OIL Ol NNNNN NNN N LL U W r < < < T < < �< P T P P T T T P < T < < < r P << r r O Q M O M M M M A A m N 08 S Y pp O m N m o w S m O M m M M m m S SO C) o NNai vNN .0*N uili1: i . (A ••OO Q P T P i O < < < r Q•r M Y < NM7mmnmmOrNd N M Y W m n m d 0 r < P < m Y < N M Lowe'! D W O f+ y� ^ Wp Q pN M m MNiv N ONnNN Q n mS NID pJ et� 'r MOU7O V W mmmm � OmP ? 'd; SS o m �' mPCls= Oi < Ct� 7 c; NadPm �eiri �om a U m P N �',' r m t� X N « PM dX JC4 _ N m NMYmmRmmQsaNX•' NM V mmn ma � F U. rNM Omm A W C00« tL fi - -- - — ILL N r n - P P 0 O O M P V on N M W 0 O �` Nmtpm �Eppmmmmu+ uQi `�' M co A 0 � � C4N 'T pmAm K a' N NN tV NCY NNE V' N rT p' ' � ' TT � M W M � T O p yp� A mm �pp� A ��yf mY` 3 A O w �a W N pm mN N i� m A A m y r p Oil N N N Pl N CY T f`1 al Pl az it AN N [V ^ N N ^ N tW"� t+t M N a9cg' M `ipNi7 °i � '�� @mvc`tiv .Np � o � �pym °m" o i ii00]] {{{�yy P N N N N N N N -W M M M p P m Y r r r tN'^ r y < < T r P r r P r T r < < I W p m p P p O m m O m m m w M N N A o� G N�1 T r r spy , a W W A xb m G Epp M r �y O O W m m N O M N N N N Y M N N M y �y Q m o s� I O Oi�1 tD o ^ W O W W 1N0r mP f00 Nr' O N� m .M- O moo Wm :a r- N p � oo K N P N r P M M P Y> jG O P N r N N r P m to m d 0 W Y O M N M p O tp O M m W N A A N a�fO � A Y Y sfW Q m p m P N p mmAAAm � AO0 Q! O < NA m � A � r r rrr PP Pr � N r� €R� p' `LW a �I m W 1c1 eepp A �p o p p N m x m p p m �p m �p p w A O O m m ems' O rr p V Ylflmp W a0p m � M W C' O � � t010Q W Mt+l7 ^ gy�pp ��pprm � A NN O C 'Y � Am(ppmmrMmAg O " rQ M NQ M MN (O tDYpN M W P- r O - N - g 6 P r w R R P < R T R P CDR PPp P r .Rp P PW Y O `�° mN am- P hOM9mm rOr � Wm nand p�p W O = PN tp7ON V mr /OpmN C i[3O R < P rP 00 W N ^ r � "N► d' aaP rrr wr OON N NN Om 0 p 0 O M N m O p N A r 4- 0Q' �r AO Rr ow rO rT �Pi O '0 N 0 M i ` O A N N b m mm NV' pmp py (�} p p dap {pyp m m a H. C 17S O OOO 6000 Af � � o ' Kc�S+ � OOP O O ONN N � m M co O' O O Q'm� a040rO� N00 !'V Q.� f� gAm � NMra pA � Q O � N N N M �' P T P P P P P R P P R r Q T F- CC c m 1 �- c c U' o N ^W ryNryry m 9 pN� m M o mp� W M� m 0.5 � N A N do W m $ Or � � N � C9 15 O O �' Q a' of.. m W a M N r P .0 P O Ny O KQ mmN b N P 'NC fmrl P/ 0 C4 to K N N N N N M M M d Z ON � � $ � � L w�i {�{yyanroN � F a N r r r r T r 1 N r r r r r I O < WeD (��ry °Dmm OS1 oND .P- met� vmi � � O K O N < P P) l+1 a N r r T r r r r P a N P r r r r < a Z W 'Q N rNN �ONy n m t Otpp W co r O O m _� a � NN � � � Q MNm � � F1 r � CO co � cmv < r r P r < r r r P P r P r CD n w < V W mmmr m c£3 ppp O m W rr � � rni ^ .�.i � W ZLU O � < r < r < < P P r r < r r r y� YI E C'nmcmnm � n � ��M Oa - - --- P < < r T < P O N N N N r r r r r r r < r � r P r < r < P P < C4 n m N m W N s{}{ W V pp a < of G G WW iV m(y N O < � of rmfV wam � Q mP Hl � m m J IL P � � rrr r r .��„� N a �PrrOrrPO �TP � aN-- � « m O (,� Ob $ < n O < m � t0gnmmn� 6f O +g � OO � � O � OTNNN r' � � O y r < << P < < r r P r r < r r v mm wggwyymo nr �R :.;-� -° VP rr mvm W m � ao cc tu� a � no � • 3 � 6 Si Pv o $ c8 � �° � rppttcqo CD ; � oQ 0' l`VOOO s ^ gal m OA000 OOOONN NQ. < r a_CCo c F= C c c 0Nm mmm n Na0 /mpm� ` + f0m � O o� Nmmmm n �pN mRN P] O Plm � � BOO m mWv VJ CI P � P y Ile WP-, m co I'- co CDf., �tl Q p �- N W a b to I- m W � a F N r r N � I � I i �s.m N Om M N M Id n 11•f[�� M�m N m m � �� N N "II � N rN AN�� NN N V pmjnp100N O m m Pp NNN N'V' b O N mb N NNANTh ' 1N Q NNN !V cm Q N rrrrr •� N rrrrr •� N �N F 88 W �O pp Q r p N®ONN, •m O NNrNe'3 C N ON N N rrrrrh N rrrrr N CL W mr�mr OOi� •Ol mgm O NN O� NN rrrr r r r r r C T r<rrrn r rrrrr �r r rr p,r M;s Z � �rP-'�W � rTrrrn r r ar d W '~a. m mbmhm0 m 0 bmm m Nm0 V' m m W L mV'Rbm = 'IIU! fr �- On-M �m �i 0 n rrrrr ,$ h ��TTrm r rrr �- rrrrr r rrr N n_ pp M N M b n n N n N mm Mm h M M in m h b m N m F OMMQK h r OM N'0' N hmMr� r mb�< M T^rrrl•. � � rrrrr ® � rrrrr � < r T rrrfO r rrrrr rrrrr rrT < r m bmnmMO m �p pry m�pN m mOTmMO _m nmNVm r N<rNM r T' rrNl"!r n �' bNmNM VrmN P! O rrOrrn J r r r T r r m r r r r r r 10 r r r r r m <r r r m O 't .y I r Om CO m :^il m MON - b N�[OVm 1D� �bd'.9 NMO Nm ' V - �t(m� r "i �' SomNm O 2'a r m ��.. ��r0 r � ��Oer,•r O •. �O�re/m0 r - yr.rr rrrrm r bmm mmpp'momw � -` rvr ��c�n� r y v (mmp w�r%m •m � mm�moni ppi�n 'p l�f �li0 (7j OO�r M � 'Y OOOrOP M CM Q `^� r rrrn rr�i-r• r rrrrr •r rrrrr r m rrrm 61M mm {{��pm n mP O M a m a O�TO21 arg 000OtM+f O arrrrr r � r rrrr r � r •r W rr <m •r GG r CC mL 1�L r C•p C O N C O'O N Nt6 em{pDpn �NNyym 0 Q ''QQ = mm mn Nm 4 mmn NmO �j v mhmN m O 1 ems• 00�OC 4j r OOIOVO V/ P OGIDV O �lT N Oom9 oN r r r O� Y m(]r r r m r GOB a m Q LU I•` _. LLI O W F QQq m Q Gj C rNMVb~ {�f rNMdW �rj a rNMV'm Q <NtoYM M K(,9 m 0Tl p M O Y N 1 r T `ia$N�1 M � Mm obi ou� < T T m m' oo O m O t0 X 0 m w Q m w O N 'O N KNcm H � /M � R' a' fm`JN Nr Q a' a' aN � r r {ram GR Nrp � NN � N1N` N Q a' e� N N N n Q M O N m O N N N r rM r aN < < M rm Off. N N CN dl om of V O Nm � 18 afvr' � f� � 'ev ''� a � � N- a` rt3 a a N O Qmr mr � oQ oM X Q Q o w M m O gq N w Q n m a' NN N Q < N < V NN N w0 arN `c� r fO OiO Fa N r r r a N r r r a N r r r r a N r r r 11 N r all �o � m mNy� O � ma� r V XM ONON � rn vm � � •<- m vnminn IL N r r r M r N T r T M r m d NN r r < N n (L {Oy +r- r M N n Z � omr mr � Or nmX '+ on mm X '� omn nMX O f„vmm n � N O � n � mw Mw O �`1mi rr nq' O � mM v. mmm w r r r Q It w r r T V < M p� r r r m N P a' w r r r Q O M arrr rM a rrr rt�'1 r rrr < M a r < rM r O O w m m M m ' w V Q tt m oe O m M m p N X _! w Q M y i mp rQ m mn m0 p �" Z& r � N m � W r r O! Q y < r RQl 0 y < r M 0 .N.. a 00 pi r a r r r N a nw F p O : ni ^ (mp imp yX� s� Q � NN (Op Xm � � n mm aD O � fN9 tD (OX< m 01� 1 OM m � 0t 1 O M Cw C4 Err MMa M 9 r r T M N a < < < r M M w �p mm � X r O O N Pr'I m � O N ImN M K 17f O O n M M a' Z) O O N N arr r M V `� a rrr T M f r a r < r r M Q r a r r r < M 4 < a'e .� N ar ri+i G arrrrel � � arrr rM C m ,� arrr < m � •� v , _ m .. O O O = � Kai � o � n � N .noo oQ cm Q' marry a r T rM O' Omar rr rM C `- at1 O a i x a O M Q N MIT X O M m m r N Z J M n V. J' n M m m N yr� m aQy < � N i M, 994 Nw O OOgg O g f N O O < n ? M m w^ M d X1.a T r r M 0` p- r r r IM Q S rt,, a a o 0 0C.)LU o C C N � � C C C C I W � � roo � � i� � �QmQ W M W O W m W ~ W of W p W Q W N a co co mnm a § mnmm �' mnmma m 0 to M C1 m ~ O m N , P r O N M a M b M m m a P r. m b b a a O N Oa) m G rp p�y p a N �j a t0 4WY P a�D O N a v m bN p W 7@ M m a N p. Nr rr < ��CCCJJJJ r 7a y� rPr Pa rr a MN � � � � � W c ON6NN � r 0 � � m 70 �} OpI� {y O co 3@ r' O r M N W a N O r O N W W N ILt4, aN-` � OS. C4 aa- � mYl i.., a IL CM W pS, ry am- r V '' mNaW ap2R '� mo Warm � M cpW 1� a 2' � ^'� noo � a3E O O �aV W O O� C-4 W N O Of� M Maa} N � n p 1n {n tam O W a M m r apt dN � � � a G ON a .vrlr0 tV< Va c 0 0.a � � � W mr p � Nron ar Mm, � SY � ,�q! < � o mo imo Aa M� 3E a N V N iV b Nfm < N r `aka f�I P a N lq N N r e� W G. N P r t] fD �V�fOy �V fap Q 1' ac tn+f arl rbM OO Cd mOal NmOmO OOcr'l 1j � m{� GO OLpV (Db 7 7 � (ON a N < < < P 1� P a O W m r N N O < a m W W iJ sir a < a N O p °i rp0°i pWn Xg OWmtap kayo '' Womg Wnag Co 10M <yraft av tl1 'r K m N N T a6 4C a10 7 N N O O O K cep i f N N N O N d W O• r W r r < r r If1 N r a r r r a < $1 bp OaW 1� OO arD �pp OO� =�a.0. aa yagi Nm a1� P� 3aGe n O `b 1a� Oa O bb a0 2W� p a O cN DN r m rPW Orcrr r- N N N- No m N O aNe- W � Wm ,- NN bNbOO R O E 28 p p Q W em- r "C V. N S N N N Ob/ W < r <P b- O C L " r < � f a O mc�r m � ma � O .�o- Wvomx ., a aD ® r 2ppR '+ m W voa � J per, cor � .P- m y � � � � � O N aY71� M" Q ryPm Krc�iN .N 04 P N N Q < r < r < a r O Q �p po tp W O N `� ln9 m G O 'i O r o P N gaQ M W '. O P 10�. If1 COD ^ O m ,_ a r< r PO r4 '' IL <N"'+ � r a < sN- r V N � G�. � N .N- r Nh O < Y &-, ds . 7 r r Nr m O m� Nm <vd' mo ra � ' � v aR n N- DO: M Q OPopNNZ 1 Or valrrlrZWE , Prrm <v< Cvp O' mD ooM, Wr O xt O a m N 0 W m O �N PD r N O p aD a< rrP rQ t7 W � 6. r < Pr r T t.. N mQ WaN N Nm � CaO `m fig+_ = C J C C S D � � { tl �� N Cp O t9 a p N� O � Q N (mom O (Mrs a �N1 WmQ v < N a � rCPVrr � O � Qr a a m m r r 1 W � � T O m {Sa+l P Mal r C. ' ...r W p ' C.4 c6 N r P P 0 T m Ofy� 54w ® (m(omy m 40 m N m � mmm P " •� t r l'Pfl fO m M 1 lmml Nu m N N o p m m mw � �C°i �iin 1m � mP �co � •o- N � � Nm rC N Om T w O ,,jj,� m m � C%l alym � a EE IL Cc � m � NI 0. N fPC (r y N a N N N INO N ^ m m m m P s� �i M O O y n o O m N O m O cmy O N m C4 P O. N � d Nmm C Nt�im m 6 N m m d NP O P[yy � m a ap Fr P °° Nm � P " o mo a 00 1 C o m m N m0) coeo nLO IL 2o C � M0 mP "� Pm mm oC4 ooR O PP a Pm Dal �i O5; , (o� Po O � wm a m PP 7 Ywl wm F P rWIAm N[1 W m m Q m i J m wt@n1Nn gg' ew- mm O M ® I[1 NN. N a rnP n n M Ncm O w a aaoaa , FF P P P Z :z a mmm eoM M mCnomonm a mmm 0 a ^ v � 1eg a � � ti L m imp 1{�� K pmw �pWp� a m ri: a � � a � mlf! M MM a YYV7 a m W N N m P M n m IC N N N N a P m m m m Q Q�i Omf C: 1�f O P P Nm Nm QQ O C. PP .- PP � ne USES ' Pmm mM cr u� � � � o= � va a V IL P vv < a' (L rPP PP a C1 mom mm Pn aP OP �nN tri � O P � O � O O _P om an g a aao � * •P aa �mn � CL aim IL < � � zP vPn n vmn �p n vmm Pm W C: m � � � � Z;lP P O .^- � � � O " mmlC O � auMi vLa Q a P P P a m a M m m m a 'mV w m IL Za 0, U 0� aa � � � v aP _ iu F s P ry Nw N p Pp P oQ oP N P P P Q N N N N w Q N m m M M C9 �= OO OO mQ OY �f w ww Oi � � P cmn tm�J t+m1 a� �` � Pmm mm ❑ Pmm In Of ❑ ¢ PQ d' Y � ❑ C7 Q C�9 C9 FFQF- QW(([�� T t�us Wto � M i � MT VWW WW OQ W ❑ vimmai N P ld Y r O N 0 (Z PIZ vr..� +N..d am V I`�Y N {`1 pp GN mm MM N om iQ O N E C m r r r p c o o c c r r T e ei r d r o 0 o c cc `+ 5 nt S m uPi L� m m> > � fc F-Gi6i6 +('ivi t- Meo"MMM E- aa �,va Hr z !W � � � it� np � mvma 3e � vmvcoimm N f4 !�l fV r acid fV r N N N z > Wg Rs 41 �$R $r$r 90 M M OGl y r M jL r CD go N N N W owl v) m y r n w W m aM- 0. NN mm 99 _an $ 9 ww S R � mto mm N � IDMPrm PF re a 0ED I 11� £�a" �rI �N .= �ir �i coot r 01 z a W`ap O Z a m W V T IL7 Q r w r a1,' II �O�pDp 1e^.0 T 1p0. p ymp P am �NMy pT M r pm M On, mMR h 1n ID1m010 {� N N NNN etQQ 70f� /0 N l+f N uj uj 4 uj Ld uj ��I N r m m m w M M M `' M M M w r � t�+f P�'1 P uj W Uj W Y EL BE M M M M N T T o � pNm O 0 xM�Maea4 �s�� aQ�Q �axa ��$fSexyN �5 � xxo x M (OHO x mt9 W a'f jtN � N aW "V OC �O Oadd eL`fV a,-: i (� d W C1 T r O Q O Q S •� m m m m �y a � M. C- W n'$W r W n ~ <Vn m N 2 Mrr1� N g � Tq n a0 m M N N FmmaD6lm FManMtior'i F �nmmmm F � � S � �Qe �xx j$ ��y�yexxx O x Q W OMr x MirDMO x 54 C C OvvvC COOL JCL t! �S a T Qp Yg m m Z�L'7� I n o i� cq m 'p i ZS O W O W S � � O {y tQi N r � � r .M- o W I" C ge C Y V m � b OS O'� O OI�W pal ON! m m 1R c j(f �tf M t�f Q m $m $ m F NJ-i nP9 F mtm vim F •ar d' Q T T T r a � � � > xxxx �x �x xxxx �5xx�xx � A x $ �o x a & ao � 0 $ $ $ x RC40to fin ¢ �$ dt �( ocao t _C4El f1 yq for = p� ? mom R ni of cAumi �mn `uQm cbn m NNW r• MEe-ry W N a+ m s r pmp ImD N W N I� O O M M OI (4 Drmi W amD W "`O f M p (Qa�.�� O O O {Q�1'tm�l A E C q+-v F m tl m m m F M iM a] m M F 510 m 111nnn m F T r r FN xxxxxx �5 aexsex �5 a�xxae rFo Se �tmo�a xR � m � o v, �N .T.. �evvr .N...d.d imp �5 �_y O R pNsr 0 8 P—i OO Si �iv� og' b pp0 Rt��vN_ GO to N N N N r" IL m O N O r � ,g •� xxxx x �exx �fx � � x xxxx avmdm V K T O d VW $t iV ED v N O em- ',� O Z N N N N tp T N m " a s m M i!�lM+! � M f�f on1 of m rm (Tj 0�0 C�7 'm l7 M w mw N m �W0 W d� " FEE oil c� Wa �'aa —aoaaaaa N i e +$N$� E5 I $ g N � � SY a � aYyp�p j$ x_p 2R T" � j� 2ye 2pe 3e ip° �mm0 � �p�_p �y 3�3"rP `e� a s s o o a v o g a sees_ a s o o n W3 ¢ v 2S tS tS o p co � w 0 < 4 ¢ a Z O � O � �5 Name 2R Jam W O Rnw �nv i8 `Nnm F� Qmvim Uo a QNO PeR sods C C4C%l d �s ll� s osso Z R� {n9MM G R � n <Or OO R�N �N oG Rv1N NN 'm- P r WD- Y pg� nnmg Y ��P � W OnOn �y Oni Simco O �= t �a'� i� eNn ,aNi F evena �i E- � v 74 to (~j 2ea��Dom Xtq n � R �m �m 3� Mti uNi M a PPGG adao Ce sded O N N N v v v y N a — iRPno � e 5t � 000 10N r(n 0'� C4 PPP ��Ws silos zO Pao,7-1 P O.CD o gg o 0 2So m o� o X�5 v W E R w n S R o a O R r a m V C R m n v urx� 0 a' ILN N a_ u imm�pp pp� n C4 C4 vvaovm � � � 1 R tN d �'N N it I Amy - O - O0 co 0as F- mm0cn cn F- [fimm J a �Pj fWD P {IUD P 1O mmJ N f�L@•r'W13�J � lW+l 'm1�n 0� i+f �$ � `� � Tl l� mm M tq M [WV F C7Y �a 'm a O'ci EE ` a a 6aaan N Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections p N O O N e^- O C F f0 !h N W LL O Ci C G to LLco C O a rND Q N N O! M 0 N N w O M �r'j mil' N W l0 N C,4 O Go Go N S N (tE C? N O O O O O O N in CS N 1Mf/ N N O fA N IY W 2r [�A FO- N r ° �p 10 tD � w CO O M N 41 ro N N M m Q O O 0 0 0 0 N Cn0 V0 r a N N N r to C ffVV ' N y � p pp t1pp �p r N N N j Of V' 7 co O O r !� W O N 100 r lih to, 2 10I P) N $ e- N G M N A Y O O A O 9 , O N O 4 0 tN. Mr n � N N N r- N A N E P Q.a OOOOO AOf,Om KJ0 M Ip 0 O 'cr �p ^ NOD V CN N A O 0 N O N N r n A �- 0 A N N n M M r aM- �--. co O {h c W to NN wr N N �yp 402j pp 1�pp po N( M pp Q N m G fD W Y N CV n n r 0 n N N N fS C O 'F N N e- � a N S a u BOO ro � gf�Ip1� a CM Q i7 N (q ccVD r N N d' N N OD OW W O 61 r O O O W �"' r N 1� o y. N E C qq�� N N G N N co cm Pa Ais 'E m ov a� w 0 = CL asap q� �r 0 a � j m IL IL m aL' L W o 10 c QyI 6i 'Oct Fla EO •mg j m � 2 �d. = m LL F j O as � � oFa � � QMu o W 2 � W gy c $ � w ro ro ro m yFf. F. � 4wN � vu� ao � m m r ' O N m r SOME o688 923 O N ti h N 0 N O M1 N NNN T N fD y�pp pppp Qm� pm� pp pa0p M M t+! RJ fq M lma M st 4 7 vm' � � � GO r O W N � N N fr7 1 m O N mF.- h m h h n I- P, CC CC W CCI 9 a Q MV) GMomm ` o � rMi, $ p C7 r CM CA M UJ W �lJ �Cl to �fJ Qp r r r Q. p M N r v 4 ICJ g Cp OD m O -con r N N N N A 9 M M M CYj S O O 0 0 O O O O N N M O T r T r T r T r r r r r r Ch v vvvv' vinmwcoGo N 'b" ohitOc� mr oNi m ° 4 0 0 0 0 0 N r N M r r Y r r r r r rr r r r r r w 0 C(tOpp t0 M d' m ry O N r OD m N O r N m O CO CO t0 m m tO n h h h ti 'O CS 0 0 0 S O 0 0 0 N N N CM r Q Q N P 'WO r CC��Oppp m�p� + tNNNV m tCrp� CMNMV V:ti-rti f'�.� M 0 0 M r 7 h O;;O 6'OO,aO O N TAN {D C M M m ti M v' N M ett hFA (Q O r•a� 7, r,r,S;r r Y, t �;Flir-Y O O W O O O r r r r r r ems- R ';; ��mp w M tmt7 ereg� 1� uNY O 'Of e1 O O O N M co m V' N O r r r r r r r r r r r p 2 } 4 O r W �Cma Q oi4m � 8� � € m '' n no i r`� m � uNi � m m N CR pp AA CA m O �j O coo O M M M N [u _ Cii !A h h h T.- H h cm a w p O O r r r r r r r r r r r p r '$ m m m = N N r m m C + N 6. W Q O C7 N r V' W ap Of o o r r r r O M CO M r h h O N v' 0 a za Q «+ 4 ' z W (� to � Q� N s O r N CO -P W m h co m r + m C4 N M v In 0 1- w � '€ F () Y F k- 0 0 v m N r10 CDNO) O) Or �D r mms� r co I.- mmhe � IDhO �[ Virg T a r NNN NNN N NNh M V iD P w r r r r h r P r Inw r r In r CD ab Mmtrtpp � fhD � � � � N00ht°+ Cl) M O �... N N N N N M N N N h R M m V) m p r r r P r r h r r r M r r r r lD r r N I D h m M 0 cb O •! M MOMc°g ? V vcO hOf h p (� ab C%l m MFfi tCJ MNM hfONPhN m '- NNNNN V'NNNh MN sI: CD r NNNNN NNNtD V' MMM � a? M p e r m CO � Mr •PN h C� OG OD (p 0702E r �lmOrmM RMOtI') OMN0103e $$ CCOO NN r r 't IN r O a N N ray IN N C 14 r r C u N N N �t M N N l'1 m b r N N N N N {+5 N N N m M M N M M w p r r r w r r F w r r P r P T tt7 r tV O r r P P r r h r w w M r r r r lD r pj N nor P m h y� h pp O O m p�y� MM Am�pp p rp eopn Op� w p� m pO r t p M E n h CO O) O Dp 1 {n M m o r o� tD mOD O) © t- OiNNt s► tVNNtD ci a m0f WmW O) eN-, 04 NM CQ CN7 CM � y rrr PrffNNNNVVrT r lD C1 N pp Q r r P T T T M1 T T T r r r r 1D T N p T r P P P w (ti w r r r r r r 1D r N 0- r_ N10 O - N M lr OrS� h V' 'nr — mh hOf M '+•t CO NO> O 3e � m �i '� hm � + aSe`�ic`� � t°� � � � M � �Dehmh co /p w r P P r r r r �- P r w w r r r r r O O N M N N r 7 m TSN p e r r r P r r P r r P r r r lf} P pj O rrr P r r m r r r r r r r 4J M> M N 0. �3 N rr N zo •p� hip p. M M +� pnr g'� r 1pr h moV rNh Nm Or C'l p-SNIV ? t� � N. N [i Cpr � g � OMNr hOMmhmDYN h Y'700NN r 000 V NNr `' r rrrrrwfD000r MNNNr �j rG m W r N - Ly V 'a DD�� 1�pp IMM�Fp p� ��D0 pp�� O Cc" CT CM10OONNMm(�( ((('jjjQQQ(Q(Qjj��I � p PP0. � 0 � 1� � '0V W 01 hhOG � ? prrrrrwtOrrr Mwt' r r{fr N p � � tr- PaP- r 0 � 000 � N N � m N W CVV ki+ arc t 5 N a, F - 42 M $ 'ry pp mm mpp 5r' M nn mm N �tjOr,D tV I.- NhN gyp ({�� CO tPD OlO W �r r' N�yI� I� aO .N cn a Cp4 ar0 m V' �Oti a rf? tq N r O O O G O r M Nt� a+ W 4 1 U p p r p p sh O O r N N < N CO, 0 p r P rrPr rrrMrrT r r, O p Qrrrr r r CCOOr r r Cl) N a Y�4 ;a a eai a (V a - N �rz r,r N._ .}Q�� IGhl9r Wr N � O N m NO mjN c� M0Msm�}} r ee," � O � O � 00 N O OOr 7 22 � O, _ F tl O pQr N M 'vW IV hm 00r N� rNMaf� u� � m hm 00rNC� +� g�g Y Y P r r r o Y Y r r r F aCL d _ a �s o > o CL 2 � .85, i � � $ sa me I � « l6 T � H � 3 � 3 � so m c $ � ; m � tiCL 3 � m8c 3 o E o ` c IDo + NO to cc G � b� j �^ " •� p� �N � o m 01 U � t E" ZJ �`. QO m 52 d Uo w cL • o a s 7 m W r W 0W r 'NV r f0 r• pb ® f` �y d' d' �p n 01 M C� W f• 7 O N M In r N N OQ CV NN f� W Cl) N N r NNN `, NNN W V' MMM <h ON a r r r M r r r M r r r r p e r r r T r r Cl) r r r r In N n CN4r N N N r N N N N M M r r r r r r r r r r r 10 p e rrrr r r r M r r r < M N IL r ns77 N I+ rp Npppp O1 d' '� Mpp ��pp < ,p rrP W T W rrrN ONOLn � 0 �y r W1� 0 OfC� N WNMCD O <F 'FS OM W ISM I� ht00fm W tDM r NNrrN � < NPIO tt MiVv CV (� r $ NNrrr rNrlq [+} MM NN r r r T P < r P (t'f7� r r r T r N a O < r r r r _ r T r M T r T r IA O LV L W m W '-1 off{ W CAh NppMOMR W W r1n � N rNOOr IIO mWO1tnNi0hW0 � r < W N07M r � &6 CpCptn0WhIOWC101hO7Cl) -4 ,�'u�i N r rr r rP r �N Or 'c{ M CV < r; ry � P rr rr Tr TrOO f'9 N MN N < OW p < r r r r r r r r CO r r P < If}r M p Q r r r r r r f0 r T r Co r r r r In N pp MCe� ��pp CCrry� ®m W pppp ��pp pp ..y�}. N CN� p �} jNCW7ONel' � � t� CD I� I'r� Q rd (pp^ ai �} NNQ� r � 6f CO f0 W N N IC) N Qr Trr rT r W OON4C' ii"MMVV Pir6 r. r r O r r rh.00 - -M N N N < T1� d p r r r r r < r r r M r r r r_ N p a r r r r r r W r r r M r r r r In tN Cq r b M N W r 1M1pp �M�pp IA W W Ol ��,pC� �� N +' w b co M N m co CD M 8 r tp 0 (.. N `W n a° Cb oOO � Or � OIOOCr� 9N1MrOP t'� � h nOO to Wsh eY CDO W W In W 127 nef YCJ - rrrrrCCCCCPPPPPrrrC7rrrr • OOOr r O OOOrNNNT N LLITT ' M 'O M lnNP � W NN' ' co W�OmOO N E OwP W N N COr M �fN WCI' �nMPq t0 p Q r r r r r T Cp r r r M r r r P '�C'P p O Q O O OP O O O O O �T' cmT Cq m r O Na N d ,Q 7',pNpp- N_, :,�,aY m�. .� p�p N"'�"�7¢'�p�'��pp N p Cry C� _ �y Cep m�. C = � OQ � OON OO � Ne�- " � to rfS Nr C1NO91N WTMCOM m O, O� r r r W r r COO r r r M r r r r r O O O N O O r N r N M 0 r 4•• r r r r T W r T r M O. 'O Q Zp QrNM 'V W WhW p1OrN IL+ OrN •0 � Y rrr F �'O � a , NM V In fO I� W Of r r r O IL a .�O p Cp a ►Q C 8 N d 0 ` C •S 9 ' ass V m O o C > U e 6 O L C6 E2 •ss�a` G m 7733ss C U W W— O p 0 m .2 'p ® y m 2 C y 0 CS z ISO R �� Ya U�42 m Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey s>,y a°8 O g Sa 11� kR (D (D m M V CO 2-a C7 O e- er P Ln N 'i 6 O C G CS C C C G Nr N W xC C C C C5 C 6 o G C] o C O o_O di .Q. m ap emp N _ t C 61� m e4 P pO L+f O r N i!5 ��p COl' C 'V' V (p m r r r C1 '� r- ''� r �7' N Oi o 0 o c Ci o c o 0 6 o d,d } „ Lpyp cV pp ® L.p '>I OD OD 3 Q 01 M CV O YV .': :,� M r N N M va o 0 0 0 o ci c o o d o d Im cc Nil .�e kis } pp [y Y O P O O M O W tp �p M m O IV N O a0+ N r r r M CO 40 N Lp r V12 Ts�f r r N to �f F J� ID co Ln r 'Q h r Ln CO kn N b' CO to r v O O Co rn U m 1n to M M O N r LO er- r y m n CP r (M = 0 0 N AD N Q CD m O) N N b tO- M M N N O N N a N IM N N Op o LLI �i d O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 M (D e} Cp (0 O C at.a M Or LcgD r 1� Q C 0 G O r V O (D O r M CO CO M O O M N r N r CO CO M r r CO (D p COO N (r) r C � �" r r OOODDDD p C r LV CL �0 O IA O r CO (p pp r M CO CO M Qi p1 O O M O In er CO M N r N r CO CO CO h r (M (D .0 ® w co CO r r r V a � a fa n: m m w w 'a a C� ECDv v o v 0co ' c i� a z o 13) m § M § �J - � - rD (D Cl). \\ - /t® ? n � ITnN04M - - - — �«_ � ' ]Cnj]C14VMC4C'4 � �- ? //§©- ® gym § © mme (Nwco � � e � � § elm sue « - ID§ IR / CL � \ § � a � 8 , k2 � C _ $ § / 2 2 ` § % .2 �a §� § a � � © Q � § R % a ° m � � © � C%JC4 � 2 CL ° k 0 . � 0000000000000000000000o00oo k 0 . _ . 0 $ ka � 2 � § � @ ■© kA §k2 � � � © � aODco CNN ems `a � e s2 a � c e 2 ■ � rgJ ■ ` I � LLa. © 252 8 , § § cOE 2 - c « 2 , � �. Ro � a2 / _ o . e � e1L a- - ULM2 § oe § I § � a � 2 _ - ao < � o a , 0 (D 7 - 222E § � # © & 2 � _ } ■ cm �■22726 ■ 2R3= 222 ■ 122J $ 8 § § � CD to 'Ime OD r 00 CO -at tun) t71 tR d ett et �Qp1 d pOp rff nF r :,� Cp r A .1+ o p m t+A1• � � � O tO/t tft � t�G, � ,r � o .. cc000eioo -o O W tOC N Ch N op N ay M O LD �1 r a tb M N N G = 0 tD O O O O O O f7 d - ` rzp 3� to ` t00 N O pppp "i tlf 'Qi� O O A Ohrr It N CO M ti 'a O N 0 0 0 N 0 O O In O a y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 O, si rl pp tT M .-1 tID N ep00, 0 a+ d O tf1 G1 P% tq ey N M to N IA O O O �-1 d O M {� ciocccocc; ccio ors v�wz' ON M � NtntOONNrrOtM � OM :GJmm _ µ.t mNNr0 WIN rOONlO •O � 'l 0 V G j.�3�, ti'nki c E iZ v co m V) CN, V.-r rr tp ED 0 c N r M r L t Ln co W •t7000000 ]CI 00T t0Mh OMMcoCD i E g m a N N to n $ C � ~ o v OWOONQ CM03 NN OOOO 0000 c N � P 0 [� r r r M O r r iCLr L � 3 w V 4p O CDc000NtArN ©) Nl-- OO Nv00 (3) 4) a~- tiMtire- w- MN r � NM N � to i r C � a d ro y L� sg o N = Y J Z $ € C H t C ` o d }�- � dU. 0 LL a t•. O LU ca �a S4 t� �- p m w E b co qi m m to = s N 3 fq N D je C � 0 w Sa1UJJJ � JG 1LCqM 117- NQ a -j p . U �► SCHOOL DISTRICT ENGAGE• EDUCATE•EMPOWER May 8,2012 Attn: Dept. of Planning Services City of Kent 400 W Gowe St Kent, WA 98032 To Whom It May Concern: Enclosed are the Determination of Non-Significance("DNS")and the Environmental Checklist for the adoption of the Auburn School District 2012 Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan. The comment period on the DNS expires at 4:00 p.m. on May 29, 2012. Sincerely, I Ne tep Supe Business/Operations Enclosures James P.Fugate AdminWi ation Bulft•916 Fourth Street NE•Aubum,WA 98002-4499 263-931-4900 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Issued with a 14-day comment and appeals period Description of Proposal: This threshold determination analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the following actions, which are so closely related to each other that they are in effect a single course of action: 1. The adoption of the Auburn School District's 2012-2018 Capital Facilities Plan by the Auburn School District No. 408 for the purposes of planning for the facilities needs of the District; and 2. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of King County and the cities of Auburn and Kent to include the Auburn School District's 2012-2018 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. The cities of Algona, Pacific, and Black Diamond may also amend their Comprehensive Plans to include the Auburn School District's Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. Proponent: Auburn School District No. 408 Location of the Proposal: The Auburn School District includes an area of approximately 57 square miles. The Cities of Auburn, Algona, Black Diamond, Kent, and Pacific and parts of unincorporated King County fall within the District's boundaries. Lead Agency: Auburn School District No.408 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse environmental impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after a review of the completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public upon request. This Determination of Nonsignificance(DNS) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issue. Comments must be submitted by 4:00 p.m., May 29, 2012. The responsible official will reconsider the DNS based on timely comments and may retain, modify, or, if significant adverse impacts are likely, withdraw the DNS. If the DNS is retained, it will be final after the expiration of the comment deadline. Responsible Official: Mike Newman Deputy Superintendent,Business and Operations Auburn School District No.408 Telephone: (253) 931-4900 Address: Auburn School District 915 0 Street N.E. Auburn, WA 98002 You may appeal this determination in writing by 4:00 p.m., May 29, 2012, to Mike Newman, Deputy Superintendent, Auburn School District No. 408, 915 4s' Street N.E., Auburn, WA 98002. Date of Issue: May 8, 2012 Date Published: May 11,2012 4 _ ENNIREN MENTAL CHECKLIST WAC 197-11-960 Environmental Checklist. Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental Impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply" Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist far nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for non- project actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND . 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: The adoption of the Auburn School District's 2012 Capital Facilities Plan ("Capital Facilities Plan") for the purposes of planning for the District's facilities needs. The cities of Auburn and Kent and the King County Comprehensive Plans will be amended to include the Auburn School District 2012 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. The cities of Algona, Black Diamond, and Pacific Comprehensive Plans may be amended to include the Auburn School District 2012 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. A copy of the District's Capital Facilities Plan is available for review in the District's offices. 2. Name of applicant: Auburn School District No. 408. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Auburn School District No.408 915 0'St.N.E. Auburn, WA 98002 Contact Person: Mike Newman,Deputy Superintendent,Business/Operations , Telephone: (253)931-4900 4. Date checklist prepared: May 3,2012 2 5. Agency requesting checklist: Auburn School District No. 408. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The Capital Facilities Plan is scheduled to be adopted by the District on May 29, 2012. After adoption, the District will forward the Capital Facilities Plan to the cities of Auburn, Algona,Black Diamond, Kent, and Pacific, and to King County for inclusion in each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. The Capital Facilities Plan will be updated annually. Site-specific projects will be subject to project-level environmental review. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The Capital Facilities Plan sets forth the capital improvement projects that the District plans to implement over the next six years. The District plans to purchase property for and construct a new middle school and a new elementary school over the next six years to meet projected student population increases. The District may also add portable facilities at existing school sites. The District will also conduct facility improvements at existing school sites throughout the District. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have undergone or will undergo additional environmental review,when appropriate, as they are developed. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. The cities of Auburn and Kent will review and adopt the Capital Facilities Plan for the purposes of updating the dries' school impact fees and incorporating the updated Plan as a part of the Capital Facilities Elements of both the Auburn and Kent Comprehensive Plans. King County will review the Plan for the purposes of implementing the County's impact fee ordinance and incorporating the Plan as a part of the Capital Facilities Element of the King County Comprehensive Plan. The cities of Algona, Black Diamond, and Pacific Comprehensive Plans may be amended to include the Auburn School District 3 2012 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan and each jurisdiction may adopt a school impact fee ordinance to implement school impact fees. 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site, There are "several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) This is a non project action. This proposal involves the adoption of the Auburn School Pr P P P District's 2012 Capital Facilities Plan for the purpose of planning the District's facilities needs. This proposal also involves the amendment of the cities of Auburn and Kent Comprehensive Plans and the King County Comprehensive Plan to include the Auburn School District 2012 Capital Facilities Plan as a part of each jurisdiction's Capital Facilities Element of their Comprehensive Plans. The cities of Algona, Black Diamond, and Pacific Comprehensive Plans may be amended to include the Auburn School District 2012 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan and each jurisdiction may adopt a school impact fee ordinance to implement school impact fees. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The 2012 Capital Facilities Plan will affect the Auburn School District. The District includes an area of approximately 57 square miles. The cities of Auburn, Algona, Black Diamond, Kent, and Pacific, and parts of unincorporated King County fall within the District's boundaries. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1'. Earth a.- General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The Auburn School District is comprised of a variety of topographic landforms and gradients. Specific topographic characteristics of the sites at which the projects 4 r e 1. included in the Capital Facilities Plan are located have been or will be identified - during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Specific slope characteristics at. the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Specific soil types found at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Unstable soils may exist within the Auburn School District. Specific soil limitations on individual project sites have been or will be identified at the time of project-level environmental review when appropriate. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject, when appropriate,to project-level environmental review and local approval at the time of proposal. Proposed grading projects, as well as the purpose, type, quantity, and source of any fill materials to be used have been or will be identified at that time. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. It is possible that erosion could occur as a result of the construction projects currently proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan. The erosion impacts of the individual projects have been or will be evaluated on a site-specific basis at the time of project-level environmental review when appropriate. Individual projects have been or will be subject to local approval processes. - 5 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings?) The construction projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have required or will require the construction of impervious surfaces. The extent of any impervious cover constructed will vary with each project included in the Capital Facilities Plan. This issue has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: The erosion potential of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and appropriate control measures have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Relevant erosion reduction and control requirements have been or will be met. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Various emissions, many construction-related, may result from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The air-quality impacts of each project have been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? _If so, generally describe. Any off-site sources of enussions or odor that may affect the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project- level environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: The individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-level environmental review and relevant local approval processes 6 when appropriate. The District has been or will be required to comply with all applicable air regulations and air permit requirements. Proposed measures specific to the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is a network of surface water bodies within the Auburn School District. The surface water bodies that are in the immediate vicinity of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. When necessary, the surface water regimes and flow patterns -have been or will be researched and incorporated into the designs of the individual projects. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require work near the surface waters located within the Auburn School District. Applicable local approval requirements have been or will be satisfied. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Information with respect to the placement or removal of fill and dredge material as a component of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied. 7 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Any surface water withdrawals or diversions required in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Each project included in the Capital Facilities Plan,if located in a floodplain area, has been or will be required to meet applicable local regulations for flood areas. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Specific information regarding the discharge of waste materials that may be required as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Ground: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general • description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may impact groundwater resources. The impact of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on groundwater resources has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project has been or will •be subject. to applicable local regulations. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. • 8 The discharges of waste material that may take place in connection with the projects included in the Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow?Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may have stormwater runoff consequences. Specific information regarding the stonnwater impacts of each project has been or will be provided during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project has been or will be subject to applicable local stormwater regulations. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may result in the discharge of waste materials into ground or surface waters. The specific impacts of each project on ground and surface waters have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project has been or will be subject to all applicable regulations regarding the discharge of waste materials into ground and surface waters. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Specific measures to reduce or control runoff impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 9 Y r 4. Plants. a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass r pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation A variety of vegetative zones are located within the Auburn School District. Inventories of the vegetation located on the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require the removal or alteration of vegetation. The specific impacts on vegetation of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. The specific impacts to these species from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plans, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, d any: Measures to preserve or enhance vegetation at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local landscaping requirements. i i I 10 5. Animals: a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: An inventory of species that have been observed on or near the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project- level environmental review when appropriate. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. , Inventories of threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on migration routes have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Appropriate measures to preserve or enhance wildlife have been or will be determined during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The State Board of Education requires the completion of a life-cycle cost analysis of all heating, lighting, and insulation systems before it will permit specific school projects to proceed. The energy needs of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined at the time of specific engineering and site 11 design planning when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe: The impacts of the projects' included in the Capital Facilities Plan on the solar potential of adjacent projects have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Energy conservation measures proposed in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be considered during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 7. Environmental Health: a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan comply or will comply with all current codes, standards, rules, and regulations. Individual projects have been or will be subject to project-level environmental review and local approval at the time they are developed,when appropriate. 12 b. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? A variety of noises from traffic, construction, residential, commercial, and industrial areas exists within the Auburn School District. The specific noise sources that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. a levels of noise would be created b 2) What types and le y or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create normal construction noises that will exist on short-term bases only. The construction projects could increase traffic around the construction sites on a short-term basis. Because the construction of additional school capacity will increase the capacity of the District's school--facilities, this project may create a slight increase in traffic-related or operations-related noise on a long-term basis. Similarly, the oP g Y� placement of portables at school sites will increase the capacity of school facilities and may create a slight increase in traffic-related or operations-related noise. Neither of these potential increases is expected to be significant. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nouproject Actions. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The projected noise impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated and mitigated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: a.- What is the current use of the site and adjacentproperties? There are a variety of land uses within the Auburn School District, including residential,commercial, industrial,institutional,utility, open space,recreational, etc. 13 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. The known sites for the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have not been used recently for agriculture. c. Describe any structures on the site. The structures located on the sites for the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified and described during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? The structures that will be demolished as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, if any, have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The sites that are covered under the Capital Facilities Plan have a variety of zoning classifications under the applicable zoning codes. Site-specific zoning information has been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Inventories of the comprehensive plan designations for the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be completed during project- level environmental review when appropriate. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Shoreline master program designations of the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will- be identified 'during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 14 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so,specify. Any environmentally sensitive areas located on the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review. L Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The Auburn School District currently serves approximately 13,849 full-time equivalent ("FTE") students. Enrollment is expected to increase to approximately 15,700 FTE students by the 2017-2018 school year. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Any displacement of people caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. However, it is not anticipated that the Capital Facilities Plan, or any of the projects contained therein,will displace any people. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-level environmental review and local approval when appropriate. Proposed mitigating measures have been or will be developed at that time,when necessary. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, If any: The compatibility of the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan with existing uses and plans has been or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive planning process and during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 9. Housing: a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. No housing units would be provided in connection with the completion of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. 15 b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. It is not anticipated that the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will eliminate any housing units. The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on existing housing have been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Measures to reduce or control any housing impacts caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 10. Aesthetics: a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The aesthetic impactsof the projects s included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Appropriate measures to reduce or control the aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined on a project- level basis when appropriate. 16 11. Light and Glare: a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review, when appropriate. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Off-site sources of light or glare that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities flan have'been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Proposed measures to mitigate light and glare impacts have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 12. Recreation: a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are a variety of formal and informal recreational facilities within the Auburn School District. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. The recreational impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or wiD be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 17 The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, including proposed new school facilities,may enhance recreational opportunities and uses. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Adverse recreational effects of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to mitigation during project-level environmental review when appropriate. School facilities usually provide recreational facilities to the community in the form of play fields and gymnasiums. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. There are no known places or objects listed on, or proposed for, such registers for the project sites included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The existence of historic and cultural resources on or next to the sites has been or will be addressed in detail during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. An inventory of historical sites at or near the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project-level environmental review when appropriate, c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Appropriate measures will be proposed on a project-level basis when appropriate. 14. Transportation: a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The impact on public streets and highways of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 18 b. , Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The relationship between the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and public transit has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? .Inventories of parking spaces located at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and the impacts of specific projects on parking availability have been or will be conducted during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The need for new streets or roads, or improvements to existing streets and roads has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Use of water, nail, or air transportation has been or will be addressed during project- level environmental review when appropriate. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The traffic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The mitigation of traffic impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 19 15. Public Services: a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The District does not anticipate that the projects identified in the Capital Facilities Plan will significantly increase the need for public services. I b. Proposed•measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. New school facilities have been or will be built with automatic security systems, fire alarms, smoke alarms, heat sensors,and sprinkler systems. 16, Utilities: a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Electricity, natural gas, waxer, refuse service, telephone, and sanitary sewer utilities are available at the known sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The types of utilities available at specific project sites have been or will be addressed in more detail during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Utility revisions and construction needs have been or will be identified during project- level environmental review when appropriate. 20 C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agencyos relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Sub itt 21 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? To the extent the Capital Facilities Plan makes it more likely that school facilities, including new high school, middle school and elementary school capacity, will be constructed, some of these environmental impacts will be more likely. Additional impermeable surfaces, such as roofs, access roads, and sidewalks could increase stormwater runoff, which could enter surface or ground waters. Heating systems, emergency generators, and other school equipment that is installed pursuant to the Capital Facilities Plan could result in air emissions. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan should not require the production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances, with the possible exception of the storage of diesel fuel or gasoline for emergency generating equipment. The District does not anticipate a significant increase in the production of noise from its facilities, although the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will increase the District's student capacities. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Proposed measures to mitigate any such increases described above have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Stormwater detention and runoff will meet applicable County and/or City requirements and may be subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permitting requirements. Discharges to air will meet applicable air pollution control requirements. Fuel oil will be stored in accordance with local and state requirements. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The Capital Facilities Plan itself will have no impact on these elements of the environment. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require clearing plants off of the project sites amd a loss to animal habitat. These impacts have been or 22 will be addressed in more detail during project-level environmental review when appropriate. The projects included in the Plan are not likely to generate significant impacts on fish or marine life. Proposed measures, to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Specific measures to protect and conserve plants, animals, and fish cannot be identified at this time. Specific mitigation proposals will be identified, however, during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The construction of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will require the consumption of energy. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be constructed in accordance with applicable energy efficiency standards. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands,floodplains, or prime farmlands? The Capital Facilities Plan and individual projects contained therein should have no impact on these resources. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: No specific measures are being proposed at this time. Appropriate measures would be proposed during project-specific review. Annual updates of this Plan will be coordinated with the cities of Auburn, Algona, Kent, and Pacific, and King County as part of the Growth Management Act process, one of the purposes of which is to protect environmentally sensitive areas. To the extent the School District's facilities planning process is part of the overall Growth Management planning process, these resources are more likely to be protected, 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The Capital Facilities Plan will not have any impact on land or shoreline use that is incompatible with existing comprehensive plans, land use codes, or shoreline 23 management plans. The District does not anticipate that the Capital Facilities Plan or the projects contained therein will directly affect land and shoreline uses in the area served by the District. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: --- - No measures to avoid or reduce land use impacts resulting from the Capital Facilities Plan or the projects contained therein are proposed at this time. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The construction projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create temporary increases in the District's need for public services and utilities. The new school facilities will increase the District's demands on transportation and utilities. These increases are not expected to be significant. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: No measures to reduce or respond to such demands are proposed at this time. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The Capital Facilities Plan will not conflict with any laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. _ 24 HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 401 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 -- 2018 BOARD OF EDUCATION MEMBERS Angelica Alvarez, Board President Bernie Dorsey, Board Vice President Susan Goding Michael Spear Tyrone Curry SUPERINTENDENT Dr. Susan Enfield Prepared by: Highline School District No.401 The Robinson Company August 21,2012 � t . HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT No, 401 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 - 2018 TAB OF CONTENTS TART T.OF CONTEND Page I EBECUTm suhfim ARY Pages 2-3 SSMON 1 CAPITAL F,A,CI rrM PLAN Pages 4-13 IlV cRmucum Page 4 OriXNZQW OF EDUCATIONAL FACOATIMS Pages 5-7 DrVXMXW OBNON-NDUCATIONAL FACILnM Page 3-9 MM FOACAW—EXISTAW FA[aUMMS Pages 10—11 FdM=SOXCA$T—NBW FACUAT3ZS Page 12 M rYEAS.MANC t PLAN Page 13 SEC',A'ION 2 WAM OF DLSMCT 13OXMAlUM Pages 14—16 119T1�Uclww Page 14 MAPS—BLEK9NTARY8CX0OL30YA`DARW Page 15 MAPS—A &MRSMOOLDOMMARM Page 16 3EMON 3 SITIWRT DOCUNUMATXON Pages 11-31 A QCnm Page 17 ADIX.DMCAPACUM Pages 18-23 PORT4=10CAMONS Pages 24-25 WROLUMM FOMA ST Pages 26—29 SX-YEARLY Page 30 iMPACTFUCALCULATION Page 31 page 1 z HICHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT No, 401 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 —2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act(SHB)2929(1990)and ESHB 1025(1991)and under the King County School Impact Fee Ordinance,the Highline School District No.401 (District)has updated its Capital Facilities Plan(CFP)as of August 21,2012. This CFP is being presented for adoption by King County before December 31, 2012.In addition,the District will be presenting requests to the City of Des Moines, the City of SeaUe,the City of Normandy Park,the City of Burien,the City of Kent and the City of Tukwila for their consideration relative to impact fees. To date King County and the City of Kent are the only jurisdictions within Highline School District No.401 that collect impact fees for schools. To collect impact fees on behalf of the District,these jurisdictions mast adopt the District's CFP by reference as part of their comprebensive plans and adopt a school impact fee ordinance. The cities of SeaTac,Des Moines,Burien,Tukwila and Normandy Park all currently collect other impact fees(primarily for transportation impacts).To collect impact fees on behalf of the District,these jurisdictions must also adopt the District's CFP by reference as part of their comprehensive plans. Highline School District No. 401 bus experienced relative low enrollment growth over the last 15 years.However,recent enrollment projections identify a significant increase in the District's enrollment between October 2011 and October 2018.This increase in enrollment will inc rew the demand on schools that are currently near, at or over capacity. These inereaees are primarily due to the anticipated growth in the unincorporated areas of I(ing County and in the City of Kent. Page 2 Over the last 10 years Highline School District No.401 has embarked on a major capital improvement effort to enhance its facilities to meet current educational and life-safety standards. Since 2002 the District has passed two major capital bonds: one in 2002 for approximately$189,000,000 and one in 2006 for approximately $14890009000. With these funds and reimbursements from the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction,the State of Washington,the Port of Seattle,the Federal Aviation Administration and private daaations for a new Aviation High School the District has designed,permitted and constructed 13 new elementary schools,2 new high schools(one of which is currently in construction),renovated 3 schools as interim facilities and renovated portions of Memorial Field and Camp Waskowitz.All of this work has been done since March 2002. As the District looks ahead it recognize$that anticipated enrollment growth, some of which will be caused by new development,will require the District to either add new facilities, add additions to existing facilities,renovate existing facilities,add portables to existing facilities re-open Beverly Park Elementary School. This CFP Identifies the current enrollment,the current capacity of each educational facility,the projected enrollment over the six-year planning period and how the District plans to accommodate this growth.It also includes a schedule of impact fees that should be charged to new development. Based on current projections,the District will have a shortage of space by 2018 and a new 643 student elementary will need to be built in the District and boundaries for some elementary schools may need to be revised.At this time it has been assumed that land will not need to be purchased to accommodate the new school. Page 3 HIGH� SCHOOL DFSMCT No. 401 CAPX'x'AL FA.CEUMS PLAN 2012—2018 SECTION I - CAEUL,E ,CILI M PLAN WM9MCnQN The Stato Growth Managomt Act rerp hw that Wormaden be gathered to detanmbe the faeUft amaiiable and needed to meet die enrollment demands of each school disbiet This section provides hifermadon about ffigbllue School District No.401's enrreat ftefidies,It existing hdW needs,its Wave facility needs aad its fmmdng plan to accommodate deftes,penrmittiag coats,constTue ion costa and nton constmedoa costa(often referred to as"soft casts"such as sales tnx,tforniaWmV3 Wanrcance,project manageeuent lees,etc.)regmhed to accowntodate Ware girr(miL The ifnance plan in this aeedoa shows how the District plans to finance bapxovments for the years 2012 through 201L The phis is based on an approved band imme(approved in 2016)by election and collection of impact fees under the State's Grows lllanagementA& •Page 4 HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 401 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012—2018 SECTION 1 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN RUMORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS(W MAps section for specific addresses) NAME,0'SCHOOL BUILDING SF PORTABLE SF TO Beverly Park at Glendale 58145 1700 59845 Beverly Park 28M 9900 37948 Bow Lake 76108 76108 Cedarhurst 68916 10) 70566 Des Moines 41766 800 42566 Gregory Heights 65978 65978 Hazel Vary 65346 65346 Hilltop 5IM2 4200 55732 Madrona 69240 1650 70890 Marvista 68462 68462 McMickea Heights 69979 69979 Midway 660% 66096 Mount View 67783 67783 North Hill 65665 65665 Parkside 68857 68857 Seahurst 59967 59967 Shorewood 60326 60326 Southern Heights 32942 2800 35742 White Center 65654 3400 69054 SUBTOTALS 1150810 26100 1176910 Page 5 M[DDLE SCHOOLS face Maps section Jbr ApISift addresses) NAME OF SCHOOL BMG SF PORTABLE SF TOTAL SF Cascade 90582 4030 94612 Chinook 87476 12184 99660 Pacific 73941 3584 77525 Sylvester 92617 3144 95761 Big Picture MS (currently at Manhattan) 5250 5250 Choice (currently at Woodside) 2000 2000 SUBTOTALS 346616 29192 374808 HIGH SMOOLS (see Maps section for specific addresses) NAME OF SCHOOL BUUJNNG SF PORTABLE SF TOTAL SF Mount Rainier 205159 205159 Highline 214919 214919 Highline PAC(250A) 7580 7580 Tyee 143101 1848 144949 Evergreen 161456 3272 164728 Aviation 87934 87934 (currently at Olympic Big Picture HS 29141 29141 (currently at Manhattm) New Start 15374 4797 20171 (at Salmon Creek) Pudet Sound Stoll Center 70894 70894 Choice 3600 3600 (at Woodside) Marine Tech 1800 1800 (at Woodside) SUBTOTALS 940958 9917 950875 GRAND TOTALS 2438384 64209 2502593 Percent of Total SF 97A3% 2.57% 100% Page 6 OTHER EDUCATIMAT.FARM ES (see Maps section for specific addresses NAMOF SCHOOL BUILDING SF PORTABLE SF TOTAL SF Valley View Early Education Center 28902 2304 31206 White Center Heights Early Learning Center 1792 1792 Camp Waskowitz 38162 38162 Performing Arts Center (at Highline HS 750/9) 22739 22739 TOTALS 89803 4096 93899 All square footages taken from 2N8 Study and Survey Page 7 EOEOHMIl SCHOOL DISMCT No.401 CAPITAL FACILITMS PLAN 2012—2018 SECTION i - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ffl% ORY O NON-EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES XjE`�,�LUPI�b PRQP�'.RTY ERAC See maps for site location and address MoTmadut"Cie See maps for site location and address CommissarylWarehom See maps for site location and address Information Technology See maps for site location and address (at Woodside) Security See maps for site location and address (at Woodside) Storage(Glacier) See maps for site location and address Page 8 IXA�n.MACM Sunny Terrace- See maps for site location and address N.Shorewood See maps for site location and address Salmon Ckeek(50%) See maps for site location and address Burien Heights See maps for site location and address ' UNDEYPkLOPED PROPERTY Zenith See maps for site location and address Lalm View See maps for site location and address Crest View See soaps for site location and address Baplevard Park See maps for site location and address CLOSED SCHOOLS Maywood See maps for site location and address Smtmyydale lglenxentary See maps for site location and address Beverly Park ffietawtary(1) See maps for site,location and address (1)Can be r"paned Page 9 i HIGIIE SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 401 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012—2018 1 -CAEML FAMMES PLAN RECAST-EMSMG FAGS rMS 2011 -2018 ' Iaacreased Enrollment • •sr:snar-sc�r+�oLs Beverly Park at Gleadale - 9 BnwlAI, + 38 Cedarhurst + 176 Ace Mohm + 37 Gregory Heights + 23(1) Hanel vausy +136 Hiiibop + 20 Madman + 29 Marvista + 9(1) mcmeisen Heiotm + 66(1) Biriidway + 99 Mount View + 52(1) forth Hill + 36 Parkdde + 45 Seshm* + 65 Shorewood + 71(1) SOUGMn Heights - 35 White Center +132 NET CHANGE FROM 2011 +991 Page 10 2011 -2018 Increased Enrolhrent MIDDLE SCHQ�II�,4 Cascade +35 Chinook +23 Pacific +81 Sylvester +98 Big Plcture +44 Choice + 7 NET CHANGE FROM 2011 +288 2011-2018 Increased ��urolhnent BS M OOf 5 Mount Rainier . 47 mwmke . 41 Tyee +26 Evergreen - 23 Aviation + 0 Big Piebwe HS • + 5 Choice us + 7 New Start + 8 Puget Sound Slab center - 15 Marine Tech + 0 NET CHANGE F8OM 2011 .80 (1)Indicates peak enrent prior to 201$ Page 11 MG aXC SCHOOL DISTRICT No.401 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012-2018 SECTION 1 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FQIZ.�''AST--NEW FACHMUS To accommodate the anticipated added elementary school enrollment the Hkhl#ne School District plans to build a new 643 student elementary school The exact location of the school has yet to be determined.Based on the location of the new school,revising individual school boundaries may be required.At this time the District has assumed the new eles=tart'school will be Wilt on land the District currently owns. The design and coffin of the new elementary school will be dependant upon voter approved capital bonds.A portion of the costs for the school will be paid by impact fees.The plan calls for the voters to vote on the new$30,000,000 capital bond measure in 2016 with construction to start in 2017 and be completed by August 201& The District may also need to add portables to specific elementary schools to accommodate increased enrollment. At this time there are so plans to add new facilities to the district except those required to accommodate future growth listed in this plan(see Needs Forecast—Exbdug Facilities section of this document). Page 12 HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 401 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 -2018 SECTION 1 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAS':-- SIX-YEAR FINANCING PLAN (values listed in millions S$) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 PROJECTED REVENUE Sources: Impact Fees(1) 0 0.200 0.200 0.200 1.095 2.712 2.891 Land Sale Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Bond for New Elementary School 0 0 0 0 30,000 0 0 Total Projected Revenue 0 0.200 0.200 0.200 31.095 2.712 2.891 PROJECTED EXPENSES Site Acquisition 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 New Elementary School 0 0 0 0 4.000 19.000 7.000 New Portables 0 0.150 0.150 0.150 0.450 0.450 0.150 Total Projected Expenses 0 0.150 0.150 0.150 4.450 19.450 7.150 ENDING BALAD[CE 0 0.050 0.100 0.150 26.795 10.057 5.798 (1) Assumes 752 single family homes and 426 apartments will be built between 2013 and 2018 (excluding King County Housing-Authority Projects).Excludes impact fees from King County Housing Authority for Greenbrldge,Scale Gardens and Windrose projects,pending formal agreement between King County Housing Authority and Hightine School District. Page 13 HxG�SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 401 CAPITAL FACMUMS PLAN 2012—,2018 �,�U=2--MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES 1MR60-R CU T10N The following maps show the service area for each school within the llisae School District.The identified boundaries are reviewed anannW.Any change in.grade configuration or adoption of new prCVWM that affect individual school populations may necessitate a chaW of a school's,service area. The Growth Management Act requires jurisdictions to evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing devekpnnents.In the case of most public facilities,new development has Its major impact on the bQities immediately adjacent to new development However,relative to school faca'lities,if a district does not have permanent fad available,interim measures must be taken until now facilities can be built or until boundaries are adjusted by the school district. Adjusting boundaries is a time-consuming and often difficult endeavor. Impacta to iudividmal children and families mast be weighed during such sa process. Currently the Hiiglaliaae School%strict is not considering any boundary changes empt those that may be required to accommodate future enre lment increases. Page 14 kllE7EIIII�"r4.` ''� j�"" 1 '" llit11I1 *Ilii" t�iA . [Jill �� M■'��tkkr�klll�'flt►�I,�'. s;-r=, � J1 . , ■-�(� � �IIli1T F ,...Y.� , f AMIX V59 it *I4W.AiR71lii lt■ ■gApa1 , FM yy T TO IT rw�, �•'*� r Y L E �'Tip,c 0-19 Lr�FLFLLi�Lw�,+. Er)rFY aa++c*.�+�� i E" 111tt1I1■1'` '`*rt�l 11 "' '� �`" tw FIEF CFEF 4", r,gd FtrFl iiiF^may 5,1A��i�ll wpm .. • =ar �ll.l.if 6llll :;r.ltp � FFit� LMV x �4� nF 41111 i fMl� lt r[iFsilsit lEFk IN WN t {�, '��' sty', •,•. s �rar etw�rw t'urc +,�-� Ft•�E��.aenrrr�!�� 1�� 01 11.a fR HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 401 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 — 2018 ` SECTION 3 — SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION INTRODUCTION The following information describes the current enrollment, the future projected enrollments and the current capacities for each school. Also included is a list of all the portables within the Highline School District. The final portion of the section defines the Impact Fees for future single-family and multi-family dwellings. The school impact fee formula ensures that new development only pays for the cost of the facilities necessitated by new development. The fee calculations examine the costs of housing the students generated by each new single family dwelling unit(or each new multi-family dwelling unit) and then reduce that amount by the anticipated state match (zero in our case) and future tax payments. Thus,by applying the student generation factor to the school project costs,the fee formula only calculates the costs of providing capacity to serve each new dwelling unit once the District reaches its current capacity. The formula does not require new development to contribute the costs of providing capacity to address existing needs. The Student Generation Factor Rates have been derived by using the averages of the Kent,Auburn, Lake Washington and Issaquah School Districts. In future years the Highline School District will use district specific data to develop the Student Generation Factor, if the data is available and accurate. Page 17 HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 401 CAPITAL FACILMES PLAN 2012—2018 ' SECTYON 3- SUPPORT DOCUMENTA�`ION BBIWING CAPACITIES phis Capital Fae ties Pupa establishes the Higbline Sthool District's"Standard of Service"'in order to delerudw the district's eurreaht and projected fature capacities. The UVIce of the Supertatmdent of Public Instruction,has established square footage guidelines for eapaaiy,primarily four the purposes of capital funding,but these guidelines often do not most the additional educational program needs districts mica provide. King County Code 21AM redesrs to a"standard of service"that each school district must establish in order to aeoortak its overall,mpadly.The standard of service ldeaddes the program yew,the class size,the number of classrooms,students sad programs of special need and other factors(detarmined by the District)which best serve the student population.Portable classroom units may be included in the capacity calculation using tha qxe standard of service as the permanent facilities. The standard of sorvioe outllked below reflects only those programs and educational opportunities provided to students that directly affect the capacity of the school building.The special programs listed below require classroom space,thus the permanent capacity dame buildings housing these programs has been reduced. White newer buildings have been,constructed to aceamunodate,some of these programs olderbuiWimp may nod to be moditied to acoammodate these programs. When this occurs thm may be a reduction in classroom capacity. At be&the ehme ntary and secondary levels,the District considers the ability of students to attend neighborhood schools to be a component of its Standard of Service. Page IS 6bndardof Service far TR.Ieme t= 8ftilenta The current standard: a Class An kindergarten = average 24students • Class sine grades 1-3 — average 25 students • Class size grades 4—6 — average 27students In the elementary standard of service model: • Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contalned classroom • All stadenls will be provided nwAc instruction in a separate classroom • AN studeub will have scheduled time in a special computer lab Identified students willovided other special educadoaal opportunities in elsawsoma►designated as • Resource room$ • Inglish Language Learners WI) • Education for disadvantaged students(Title la • GMed education • Darning assisted prograrass a Sewerely behavior disordered • Transition rooms • MIK moderate and severe disabilities • Devebinaeastai kindergarten • Extended dayear'e programs and preschool programs - Page 19 itandsrd of 8midee hr ft itry• ` etnsy The current standard is: * Maas size for grades 7-8 should not exceed 30 students * Claus size for grades 9-12 should not exceeLt 32 students • SPeCW FAwAtion.for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- dassroo aiq�rovided other special educational opportunities in • ash Language Learners(ELL) • Resource roams(ft special remedial assiatanee) • Computer labs • Preschool and daycare programs Page 20 HICiiFIr.RtE Sl�idOL FE318'IRTL"T No. Cuner�t CAPITAL WILITUM PLAN 2011 201B1Peak OgMWV 2011 2011 2018IPeak 2018/Peak BUILDING CAPACfliES with ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS l6wa eeet Enrollment Porfmblmi Su us shurtmi Surplus Shortage Bevedy Park st t1leaiale 477 4M 536 53 62 Park 0 0 316 316 316 LTIM 668 707 675 6 32 rham 637 913 675 62 238 mowsi 37p 56 92 He Say 580 575 i8 "mum Yalle an 758 675 46 181 IND m 600 525 55 75 Madrom 687 hie 575 12 41 arA to 577 586 575 2 11 NlcMicken Hem& 443 we 576 132 66 567 GGS 6r5 8 91 Mount view 610 Gn 575 35 87 North HUI 561 587 573E 24 12 PeAmide 517 582 675 58 13 fthm Say an sm 7 73 Shornwood 485 656 6 10 8i SouthemHoInIft 298 263 12 47 White Center Hem 571 703 675 4 128 ALS 0719 10076 031 283 5041 1147 or8a1 3481 1 1643 PAGE 21 HICIHUm ScHooL UtBmar No.401 Current CAPITAL FACIUTIES PLAN 2018IPeok Capad%r 2011 2011 2018dPeak 20181Peak 13UILD G CAPACITIES withUMOR HIGH SCHOOLS is:wntlErim9mat Portables Surous Shortage Swplus Shortage cascade 560 596 700 140 1os L2dnook "5 578 700 145 122 PROM 883784 000 83 164 Swag—or 594 692 700 100 B ft Picture 37 81 75 38 6 Choice 42 49 75 33 26 TarALS 2471 2769 2850 462 83 261 170 Het smitage ors fua 1 379 91 PAW 22 HISHLINESCHOOI.MTR1Cf Na 401 Current CAPITAL FACIL1716S PLAN 2011 20181Peak Capaolk 20t1 2011 20181Peak 20181Peak WLi2NG CAPACITIES rrllh HIGHSCHOGLS Fwafkand Ertro0ment Portables Su us Shortage Surplus Shortage 817 IM 950 133 117 Everamed loll 988 11001 89 112 H-mblifte 1382 1341 1300 82 M Mount Ratater law 1508 4800 66 8 Eft MUM 119 1241 125 S 1 Choice 30 37 35 5 2 viatica 421 421 400 21 21 NOW Start 287 295 300 13 5 u et somnd MIS Center wm 368 4001 29 44 TOTALS 5983 5913 4110 275 l58 269 72 Net S or Iers 117 197 PAGE 23 R ghm"School Dutrict#401 Portable inventory V ON Mae yen on Ft. Qcc a rooms Beve Park She 2 Double Po►Wbies 3,300 Portable 4 Beverly Park She MNWtabie 207&208 1,650 Portable 2 Beverly Park Site MlPortable 205&206 1,650 Portable 2 Beve Park Site M/Portable 209&210 1,650 Portable 2 everly Paric Site M/Partable 2111212 1,650 Portable e e Portable#95 786 Portable 1 Cascade Middle SoOwd P #99 786 Portable 1 Cascade Middle School MtPo We 203&204 1 672 Portable 2 C 786 e urst e Chink Milddte Schoo 219&220 1,792 Portable 2 Chinook Middle Schad Mf zortabie 225&226 1,792 Portable 2 Chinook Middle School orW*213&214 1,672 Portable 2 Chink Middle School Portable 243 Ever-Sci 1,672 Portable 1 Chinook Middle Schad Wortabla 201 &202 1,672 Portable 2 Chinook Middle School M/Portable 215&216 1,792 Portable 2 Chinook M le 217 9 218 1,792 POTIVIC118 9 _-, Eye teen High School Portable AM 83 1 Emergreen High School Portable#20 832 Portable 1 Eynteen HI h School Port"Ill 2 816 Portable 1 �High School FO—iW9140 792 e H' Elementary 041 840 Portable H1111top F_leme 188 840 Portable 1 Hftp Elemen PortableV12 840 Portable 1 Hilltop Elernentery WForleft 9123&224 1, 0 o e tone , Manhaittan Learning Center eetoom Build 07 360 Portable 1 Manhattan Learning Center Portia f2l 832 Portable 1 Manhattan Center Portabla#25 832 Portable 1 ManhaWn Leam!m Center Portal 04 816 Portable 1 Manhattan Lmirnlng Center Po[tabh: 792 Portable 1 Manhattan Lesndrig Center Porkft#72 792 Portable 1 Manhattan Learning Center Portable F7-6 792 1 Portable 1 Manhattan Leamkv Center Portatrta#m 792 1 Portable 1 Manhattan Leamirm Getter Portabto tw 792 Portable 1 Manhattan Center Portable i107 786 Portable 1 n 92 —Tro-na-69— I Pacific oldie School I PorWIe251&262 1,792 Portable 2 Pacific Portable Page 24 114m ne School Ditniet"I Portable Inventory Location Description Sq.Ft. Occ type rooms Salmon Creek Portable43T 916 Portable 1 Salmon Creek Portable M 792 Portable 1 Salmon Creek Portablet147 792 Portable 1 Salmon Creek Portable 768 Portable 1 Salmon Creek Portable tl88 792 Portable 1 Sa on Creek 13 3 —FOMabte Sauttrem9*wtwy Portable IFIAOT Vacant 925 Portable 1 Souther Fl ' Portage 283 925 Portable 1 -somem 51mmelary Portable9 unny I erraoe Portable SM SunnyTerrace ofteo e {vaster Middle Schad 77rtable#64 4768 Po e 1 {vaster Middle School Porfable#71 Portable 1 r Middle Schad Portabe m Portable 1 aster Middle o e a e Valley View 019 Portable 1 Vali View Portabt M Portable 1 vanylaw 768 Portable 231&232 1,700 Portable 2 1, e Woodside M&234 1,545 Portable 2 Woodside 235&236 WCH FMC 1,792 Portable 2 Woodside 237&238 1,792 Portable 2 Woodside WoMble 229&230 1,848 Portable 2 Woodside Prxffirb191131 818 Portable 1 Woodside 792 Portable 1 Vftdidde NVPOIUM 241 &2421,792 e Page 25 HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 401 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 — 2018 SECTION 3 — SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION STUDENT ENROLLMENT FORCASTS The followingdocuments are summaries b school and b grade level of Y Y the enrollment projections provided by Mghline School District's demographer Les Kendrick.The numbers listed represent Full Time Equivalent counts(FTE). The demographer used cohort survival rates with adjustments for projected future changes in housing and population changes. Page 26 8 0 tpip� may} type t�py �p tm V�'1 h b ac coo h w in in b `c vs in h N b v a Q U O v. � � O r Q 8 w eno 5 � vl N � � Q w QQ w oo n do v, in �s pp jI S []� st �O l� eM1' In �O iff h h %n tiD V�1 vv h cp N � o a R `iZAI ¢ Ti m in � vn prp m cM� �ed� o rr in 00 00 QQ� • 4 �O N `Md' N �G !A h N eF H �D N vw1 %"n N 0' 1 9 $ wt m ® � V' dM' �O Ch h in h "0 h ,Zn Val N D O O n e w 04 n r o� n n M t` o .• r r v, oo -� h m y rn in b h h 'V N 4n, P a r ao P. H C h a e0" C v�i N M In VS H b v'1 u'i in M 111 h h Vl d' F1 N CH •� m $ lit m N m m m oo eo 0 0, a o0 spy o a Yam, 1 N VN V�f Yam, h h YM'1 on h dn' 4�' MV CRLm M Q' v�i iA vet b An d� v, M � � N v' 'm v � h v'f py�� 4y ��yy l� O G+ tt �.p� M f� uY v1 0� fir, n 77-4 N '1t ef` v'i b in b tl' Mr! h Yam, V�'1 M M M gr% � � o � � a , u ss r s 0p Ti " in N O 0000 vai v`Ei c r o 0 0 h terry Y9 C:� 'd O C O p All h� � • to �o o Sg�o Tn in o aoo v o 0 0 "rryy a W Bita. 471 N _ Lg � t/2 � 1 P O N M a Ixg aim Vt M Can en cn 'NQ' A h .N-t in N N M t j YOB. �cO7th ccV� � W t�i t"n °� tV M fn eM M � tR ci �' m v in Ali M ,4. M HMNM ��11Go a p ap t+1 In N N m sf .m-� in m N M m M all M � F N tY en 'd N V in cl M M m pp pppp �y M M Q N icen M 'd. cn h cn M A c q a ern m 60 cn cn cn 'w '��^ "i �Q'+ N cfn i� o o� m N c t�py $� w �o �n p� .1 M a, N M a1 t+1 e? „ma b �o N O /1 M �G • S 00 00 'ems & 7V�lf N m N m cn sF ma .r �'r+ N m tiD in o pgpg 1w ,� N Tq 1 m ?"WE Z.9 Hlg Sbc-Year ie Ele4ne Ian ears 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 201! ant 9,896 9 696 9 696 9 698 9,696 aw Construdom Now Elomwftv Sohool 0 0 D 0 0 643 Permanent subtoiah 9,696 9,6g6 9,696 GM 9,698 10,330 Pro ant 9,917 10083 1024 10428 D,558 0,682 S of Pemtener�t 221 -W -552 -732 -862 -343 Portable 380 3601 380 38D 380 380 01 01 01 01 0 u"m(2m vim Porgy 1 -172 -352 -4821 37 Junior H -6 n Yeam 2017 2018 Psrma<tent 2 250 Z250 2,260 Z250 2RE Now cormtnmum.Nana 0 a 0 0 0 0 Permanent ce subtoM 2t2_60, 2.250 5 2 250 Projected Enrollment 2549 2692 2824 2597 2680 2758 surplusweffom or Pertrranent 9 -342 -374 -347 r930 -508 Portable CapsW Avallable: 600. 6001 0001 600 600 o t - 0 01 01 0 0 sorplusemVp1hpWimblam 301 201 2ml 2531 170 C 1 P1en Yeats: 2016 2016 2017 20118 ernanent Capaoft 6910 w0 -solo 3910 1 5910 New ConWAxd=None 0 a 0 0 0 0 Permanent 5910 5910 5910 6910 5910 5910 ProlsoWd rEnrogmard 6752 raw 6717 5842 4916 6933 5 F Rmanot Cq;W*. 168 241 193 68 -6 -23 Portable Ce Available:.: 200 200 200 200 200 200 Portable capwv Changes +- a 0 0 0 0 0 ltts vn'th Portables 358 4411 awl288 19i 177 -12707AL ears; 2D13 2014 2015 20161 2017 2018 P C l7 866 17,856 7.855 17,856 17,856 10,499 acted En Invent 1821 1 44 1 589 18,887 1915d 19 373 S of armanertt Ca -486 -733 -1,011 -1,298 -874 Portable ca AvaBsbie: 1180 1180 1180 1180 1180 1180 Fwam LAM +/-. 4 0 0 0 0 Nis P 447 169 - 1 306 Page 30 NIGHLiNE SCHOOL RiCT as 4D MPACT fEE CALCULATit'MV ust 21, 2012 Student Student School Site Ac uisltlon Cost: Facility Net/ Facility Factor Factor CosUSFR Cost/MFR Sco a Acreage Acre Capac& SFR MFR lementa Schools $0 0 0.426 0.162 $0 $0 Middle Schools 0.132 0.047 $0 $0 High Schools 0.149 0.066 $0 $0 TOTALS $o r $o Student Student School Construction Cost: Facft Facility Fedor Factor COSUSFR Cost1MFR Scope %Perm Fac. Cost Capacity SFR MFR Elementary Schools 1 site 97.43% $30M 643 0.426 0.162 $19,354 $7,364 Middle Schools 0.132 0.047 $0 $0 High Schools 0149 0 066 $0 $0 TOTALS $19.364 $7,364 Student Student TeMporary Fadlitles Cost: Facil(tv Facility Factor Factor CosUSFR CostAMFR Scope 96 Perm Fac. Cost Ca act SFR MFR Elqmqntary Schools 2.57% 0 0 0.426 0.162 $0 $0 Middle Schools 0 0 0 0.132 0 047 0 $0 High Schools 0 0 0 0.149 0 066 $0 $0 OTA $0 0 Student Student Lj fate Match CreditCakulstion: nat.Cost SF! State Factor Factor CosUSFR CosUMFR SF Student Match SFR MFR lemente Schools 0 0 0 0.426 0.162 $0 $0 Iddle Schools 0 0 0 0132 0.047 $0 $0 Hi h Schools 0 0 0 0.149 0 066 $0 $0 OTALS $0 $0 Tax Payment Credit: CredtUSFR CredIUMFR Average Assessed Value $248,087 $83 849 G ' I Bond Interest Rate 3 84% 3 84% Net Present Value of Average Dweling $2,028,331 $685,640 Years AmortlzW 10 10 Pr a Tax Le Rate $1 746 $1.746 ax Pa t Credlt $3,541 $1,197 Mitigation F22 SuMM C st1SFR Ca FR drool Site Ac uistdon Coat $0 $0 School Construction Cost $19,364 $7,364 Temporary Facilities Cost $0 $0 State Matching Credit Calculation $0 $0 Tax Payment Credit Calculation $3 641 $1 197 SUBTOTAL $15 823 $6 167 Local Share 47,912 -$3,0 LCULATED IMPACT FEE $7 912 $3 084 2013 IMPACT FEE $7 912 $3,084 Page 31 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAC 197-11-960 Environmental Checklist. Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS Is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional Information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply" In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for nonproject actions(part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: The adoption of the Highline School District No 401's 2012 Capital Facilities Plan ("Capital Facilities Plan")for the purposes ofplanning for the District's facilities needs. King County will incorporate the District's Capital Facilities Plan into its Comprehensive Plans. The cities of Burien, SeaTac,Normandy Park,Des Moines, Tukwila and Kent may incorporate the District's Capital Facilities Plan into their Comprehensive Plans. A copy of the District's Capital Facilities Plan is available for review in the District's offices. 2. Name of applicant: Highline School District No.401. 3. Address.and phone number of applicant and contact person: Highline School District No 401 17810 8a`Avenue South,Building A Burien,WA 98148 Contact Person: Andrea Johnson,Director of Facilities Telephone: (206)433 -2251 4. Date checklist prepared: August 6,2012 5. Agency requesting checklist: Highline School District No 401 2 6. Proposed timing=or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The Capital Facilities Plan is scheduled to be adopted by the District's Board of Directors on or about August 22, 2012. After adoption, the District may forward the Capital Facilities Plan to King County and the Cities of Kent, Normandy Park, SeaTac, Des Moines, Burien and Tukwila for inclusion in the Comprehensive Plans for each jurisdiction. The District will continue to update the Capital Facilities Plan annually. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-level environmental review when appropriate. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. The Capital Facilities Plan identifies the capital improvement projects that the District plans to implement over the next six years. The District plans to construct one new elementary school. Relocatable capacity may also be added at all grade levels 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will undergo additional environmental review,when appropriate,as they are developed. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. The District anticipates that King County will adopt the Capital Facilities Plan as part of the King County Comprehensive Plan. The cities of Burien, SeaTac, Normandy Park, Des Moines, Tukwila and Kent may incorporate the District's Capital Facilities Plan into their Comprehensive Plans. 3 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) This is a nonproject action. This proposal involves the adoption of the Highline School District's 2012 Capital Facilities Plan for the purpose of planning the District's facilities needs. The cities of Burien, SeaTac, Normandy Park, Des Moines, Tukwila and Kent may incorporate the District's Capital Facilities Plan into their Comprehensive Plans. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to project-level environmental review when appropriate. A copy of the Capital Facilities Plan may be viewed at the District's offices. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient Information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The Capital Facilities Plan will affect the Highline School District. The District includes portions of unincorporated King County and all or portions of the cities of Burien, Des Moines, Kent, SeaTae, Tukwila and Normandy Park. A detailed map of the District's boundaries can be viewed at the District's offices. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The Highline School District is comprised of a variety of topographic land forms and gradients. Specific topographic characteristics of the site at which the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan is located will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 4 b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Specific slope characteristics at the site of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be identified during project-level environmental review. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? if you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Specific soil types found at the site of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? if so, describe. Unstable soils may exist within the Highline School District. Specific soil limitations on individual project sites will be identified at the time of project-level environmental review when appropriate. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject, when appropriate, to project-level environmental review and local approval at the time of proposal. Proposed grading projects, as well as the purpose, type, quantity, and source of any fill materials to be used have been or will be identified at that time. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? if so, generally describe. It is possible that erosion could occur as a result of the construction projects currently proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan. The erosion impacts of the individual projects will be evaluated on a site-specific basis at the time of project-level environmental review when appropriate. Individual projects will be subject to local approval processes. 5 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings?) The construction projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will require the constriction of impervious surfaces. The extent of any impervious cover constructed will vary with each project included in the Capital Facilities Plan. This issue will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: The erosion potential of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and approbate control measures have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Relevant erosion reduction and control requirements will be met. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? if any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Various emissions, many construction-related, may result from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The air-quality impacts of each project will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Non project Actions. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: The individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to project-level environmental review and relevant local approval processes when appropriate, The District will be required to comply-with all applicable air regulations and air permit requirements. Proposed measures specific to the individual project 6 included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is a network of surface water bodies within the Highline School District. The surface water bodies that are in the immediate vicinity of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. When necessary, the surface water regimes and flow patterns will be researched and incorporated into the designs of the individual project 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require work near the surface waters located within the Highline School District. Applicable local approval requirements will be satisfied. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Information with respect to the placement or removal of fill and dredge material as a component of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan can be provided during project4evel environmental review when appropriate. Applicable local regulations wM be satisfied. 7 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Any surface water withdrawals or diversions required in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be addressed during project- level environmental review when appropriate. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan,if located in a floodplain area, will be required to meet applicable local regulations for flood areas. B) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Specific information regarding the discharge of waste materials that may be required as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be provided during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Ground: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. The individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may impact groundwater resources. The impact of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on groundwater resources will be addressed during project- level environmental review when appropriate. The projects will be subject to applicable local regulations. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged Into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; Industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. 8 The discharges of waste material that may take place in connection with the projects included in the Plan will be addressed during project-level environmental review. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may have stormwater runoff consequences. Specific information regarding the stormwater impacts of each project will be provided during project-level environmental review when appropriate. The projects will be subject to applicable local stormwater regulations. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may result in the discharge of waste materials into ground or surface waters. The specific impacts of the projects on ground and surface waters will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. The projects will be subject to all applicable regulations regarding the discharge of waste materials into ground and surface waters. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Specific measures to reduce or control runoff impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 9 4. Plants: a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation A variety of vegetative zones are located within the lEghline School District. Inventories of the vegetation located on the site of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan will be developed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require the removal or alteration of vegetation. The specific impacts on vegetation of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. The specific impacts to these species from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be determined during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plans, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Measures to preserve or enhance vegetation at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. The projects will be subject to applicable local landscaping requirements. 10 5. Animals: a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other. An inventory of species that have been observed on or near the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan will be developed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Inventories of threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be developed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. is the site part of a migration route? if so, explain. The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on migration routes will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Appropriate measures to preserve or enhance wildlife will be determined during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed projecVs energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The State Board of Education requires the completion of a life-cycle cost analysis of all heating, lighting, and insulation systems before it will permit specific school projects to proceed. The energy needs of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be determined at the time of specific engineering and site design planning when appropriate. Please as the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 11 b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe: The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on the solar potential of adjacent projects will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? list other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Energy conservation measures proposed in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be considered during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 7. Environmental Health: a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will comply with all current codes, standards,rules, and regulations. The individual projects will be subject to project-level environmental review and local approval at the time they are developed,when appropriate. b. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? 12 A variety of noises from traffic, construction, residential, commercial, and industrial areas racists within the Highline School District. The specific noise sources that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be identified.during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create normal construction noises that will exist on short-term bases only. The construction projects could increase traffic around the construction sites on a short-term basis. Because the construction of a new elementary school will increase the capacity of the District's facilities, they may create a slight increase in traffic-related or operations-related noise on a long-term basis. This potential increase is expected to be insignificant. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The projected noise impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be evaluated and mitigated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. The projects will be subject to applicable local regulations. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? There are a variety of land uses within the Highline School District, including residential,commercial,industrial,institutional,utility,open space,recreational, etc. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. The potential sites for the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have not been used recently for agriculture. c. Describe any strtu*ures on the site. The structures located on the site for the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be identified and described during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 13 d. WIN any structures be demolished? If so,what? The structures that will be demolished as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, if any, will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The site that is covered under the Capital Facilities Plan may have a variety of zoning classifications under the applicable zoning codes. Site-specific zoning information will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Inventories of the comprehensive plan designations for the site of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be completed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Shoreline master program designations of the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Any environmentally sensitive areas located on the site of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be identified during project-level environmental review. i. Approximately htwv many people would reside or work in the completed project? The Highline School District currently serves approximately 18,192 students. Enrollment is expected to increase to approximately 19,443 students by the 2017-2018 school year. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 14 Any displaoement of people caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. However, it is notanticipated that the Capital Facilities Plan, or the projects contained therein,will displace any people. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: The individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to project-level environmental review and local approval when appropriate. Proposed mitigating measures will be developed at that time,when necessary. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The compatibility of do specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan with existing uses and plans-will be assessed as part of the comprehensive planning process and during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 15 9. Housing: a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. No housing units would be provided in connection with the completion of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. It is not an icipated that the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will eliminate any housing units. The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on existing housing will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Measures to reduce or control any housing impacts caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 10. Aesthetics: a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be addressed during project-level.environmental review when appropriate. 16 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Appropriate measures to reduce or control the aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be determined on a project-level basis when appropriate. 11. Light and Glare: a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be addressed during project-level environmental review,when appropriate. b., Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Off--site sources of light or glare that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Proposed measures to mitigate light and glare impacts have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 12. Recreation: a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are a variety of formal and informal recreational facilities within the Highline School District 17 b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. The recreational impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be addressed during project level environmental review when appropriate. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may enhance recreational opportunities and uses. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Adverse recreational effects of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to mitigation during project-level environmental review when appropriate. School facilities usually provide recreational facilities to the community in the form of play fields and gymnasiums. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. The existence of historic and cultural resources on or next to the site of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be addressed in detail during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. An inventory of historical sites at or near the site of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be developed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Appropriate measures will be proposed on a project-level basis when appropriate. 18 14. Transportation: a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The impact on public streets and highways of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The relationship between the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and public transit will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Inventories of parldng spaces located at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and the impacts of the specific projects on parking availability will be conducted during projectdevei environmental review when appropriate. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The need for new streets or roads, or improvements to existing streets and roads will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Use of water, rail, or air transportation will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? if known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The traffic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 19 g. Proposed measu m to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The mitigation of traffic impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 15. Public Services: a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The District does not anticipate that the projects identified in the Capital Facilities Plan will significantly increase the need for public services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. The new school facility will be built with automatic security systems, fire alarms, smoke alarms,heat sensors,and sprinkler systems. 407. Utilities: a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Electricity, natural gas, water,refuse service,telephone, and sewer are or can be made available at the potential site of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The types of utilities available at the specific project site will be addressed in more detail during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. Describe the utHtties that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Utility revisions and construction needs will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate, 20 C. SIGNATURE The ab answers are true and complete to the beat of my knowledge. I understand the lead agency is rel on them to make its decision. 1 Signature: 44 JA AW Date Submi RAI 012 21 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. r When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? To the extent the Capital Facilities Plan makes it more likely that the new school facility will be constructed, some of these environmental impacts will be more likely. Additional impermeable surfaces, such as roofs, access roads, and sidewalks could increase stormwater runoff; which could enter surface or ground waters. Heating systems, emergency generators, and other school equipment that is installed pursuant to the Capital Facilities Plan could result in air emissions. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan should not require the production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances, with the possible exception of the storage of diesel fuel or gasoline for emergency generating equipment. The District does not anticipate a significant increase in the production of noise from its facility, although the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will increase the District's student capacities. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Proposed measures to mitigate any such increases described above or will be addressed during project level environmental review when appropriate. Stormwater detention and runoff will meet applicable County and/or City requirements and may be subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permitting requirements. Discharges to air will meet applicable air pollution control requirements. Fuel oil will be stored in accordance with local and state requirements. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The Capital Facilities Plan itself will have no impact on these elements of the environment. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require clearing plants off of the project site and a loss to animal habitat. These impacts will be addressed in more detail during project-level environmental review when appropriate. The projects included in the Plan are not likely to generate significant impacts on fish or marine life. 22