HomeMy WebLinkAbout1825Resolution No. 1825
(Amending or Repealing Resolutions)
CFN = 961 -Growth Management Plan
Passed-4/20/2010
Countywide Plannmg Policy-Ratify
RESOLUTION NO. /? c:<. _s-
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, ratifying the K1ng County
Countywide Plann1ng Pol1c1es adopted by the
Metropolitan King County Council and approved
under Growth Management Planning Council
(GMPC) Mot1ons No. 09-1 and 09-2 adopt1ng a
work plan and schedule to address the pol1cy
framework for allocation of reg1onal serv1ces and
facil1t1es and updating existing pol1c1es and Table
LU-1 to prov1de for hous1ng and employment
targets for the penod 2006-2031.
RECITALS
A. The adoption of countywide planning pol1c1es IS requ1red under
the State Growth Management Act (GMA), pursuant to RCW 36. 70A.210.
The Countywide Plann1ng Pol1c1es (CPPs) prov1de a framework for Kent and
other c1t1es 1n Kmg County to conduct planning under the requirements of
GMA. Th1s framework ensures that c1ty and county comprehensive plans
are cons1stent. On January 25, 2010, the Metropolitan King County Council
approved and rat1f1ed amendments that had been approved by the Growth
Management Plann1ng Council (GMPC) adopting a work plan and schedule
to address the pol1cy framework for allocat1on of reg1onal serv1ces and
fac1l1t1es and updating existing pol1c1es and Table LU-1 to prov1de for
housing and employment targets for the penod 2006-2031. The
1 Countywide Planning Policy -
Ratify
amendments are now presented to JUrisdictions 1n King County for
rat1f1cat1on.
B. On January 25, 2010, the following GMPC mot1ons to amend
the CPPs were approved and rat1f1ed by the full County Council:
1. GMPC Motion No. 09-1: adopts a work plan and
schedule to address the pol1cy framework for allocation of reg1onal serv1ces
and faci11t1es.
2. GMPC Mot1on No. 09-2:
a. Updates ex1stmg polic1es to prov1de for housmg
and employment targets for the penod 2006-2031;
b. amends Table LU-1 related to growth targets.
C. The County Council approved and rat1f1ed these amendments
on behalf of Kmg County pursuant to Kmg County Ordmance No. 16747.
The Kent Econom1c and Commun1ty Development Committee rev1ewed
these amendments at 1ts meetmg on Apnl 12, 2010.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT,
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
RESOLUTION
SECTION 1. -Amendment. The City of Kent, acting pursuant to the
interlocal agreement among Kmg County, the City of Seattle, and
Incorporated suburban c1t1es, hereby rat1f1es the proposed amendments to
the Countywide Plannmg Pol1c1es as adopted by the Metropolitan Kmg
County Council in Kmg County Ordmance No. 16747, attached and
Incorporated hereto as Exhibit A.
2 Countywide Planning Policy -
Ratify
SECTION 2. -Public Insoect1on. The amendments to the
Countyw1de Plann1ng Polic1es adopted herem shall be f1led w1th the City
Clerk and placed 1n the econom1c and commun1ty development off1ce so
they are available for inspect1on by the public.
SECTION 3. -SeverabilitY. If any section, subsection, paragraph,
sentence, clause or phrase of th1s resolution IS declared unconst1tut1onal or
mval1d for any reason, such dec1s1on shall not affect the val1d1ty of the
rema1n1ng port1ons of th1s resolution.
SECTION 4. -Rat1ficat1on. Any act consistent with the authority
and pnor to the effective date of th1s resolution IS hereby rat1f1ed and
affirmed.
SECTION 5. -Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon
approval of the City Attorney, the City Clerk and the code rev1ser are
authonzed to make necessary corrections to th1s resolut1on, 1nclud1ng the
correct1on of clencal errors; references to other local, state or federal laws,
codes, rules, or regulations; or resolution numbenng and
sect1onjsubsect1on numbenng.
SECTION 6. -Effective Date. Th1s resolution shall take effect
immediately upon 1ts passge.
PASSED at a regular open publ1c meeting
rJ-.-
City of Kent, Washmgton, th1s dO day of
by the City Council of the
~ ,2010.
CONCURRED In by the Mayor of the City of Kent th1s ,;?o~ay of
/tpetl 12010.
tywide Planning Policy -
Ratify
SUZETIE COOKE, MAYOR
ATIEST:
/ -/
----
' ---. . ~ . -. -
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
... --. .:._ ....... .: .:....._ ...
/ .... . .. /
-.: ..... .. .. ~......... ~
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No.
/ f~6 passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, the
d.o ilL.-day of ~ 1 2010.
----···-, .. ·
-.:
; .... ·:~ .. ~ --....
: .... ----:----_ .... _ -.' .... -----
~ CLERK
4 Countywide Planning Policy -
Ratify
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
i 17
J
I 18 I
J
\
19
li KING COUNTY
Signature Report
l200 1\.mg Count) Courthou:;c:
5 I 6 I htrd /\\'t:nue
Seallle, \\A 98 I 0~
King County
January 25, 2010
Ordinance 16747
Proposed No. 2009-064l.l Sponsors Hague and Philhps
AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the
Countyv.·Ide Planning Policies; adoptmg a work plan and
schedule to address policies related to allocation of regional
services, and adopting ne"" housing and employment
grovvth targets, and ratifying the amended Countywide
Planning Policies for unincorporated King County; and
amendmg Ordmance l 0450, Section 3, as amended and
K.C.C. 20.10 030 and Ordinance !0450, Section 4, as
amended, and K.C.C 20 I 0.040.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COlTNTY
SECTION 1. Findings:
A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth
Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012 -County\\ Ide Planning
Policies (Phase I) m July 1992, under Ordinance I 04 50.
B. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase II
amendments to the Countywide Planning Pohc1es on,August 15, !994, under Ordmance
I 1446.
C. The Grow1h Management Planning Counci!'met on October 28, 2009 and
voted to recommend amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies,
1
Ordmance 16747
20 adopting Motion 09-1 approvmg a work plan and schedule to address the policy
21 framev.ork for allocation of regional services and facilities as shown in Attachment A to
22 this ordinance ani adoptmg Motwn 09-2 amending Table LU-I of the County\V1de
23 Planning Pohc1es and approvmg related policy amendments as sho\vn on Attachment B
24 to this ordinance.
25 SECTfON 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended. and K C. C. 20.10.030 are
26 each hereby amended to read as follows:
27 A The Phase II Amendments to the Kmg County 2012 County\\ Ide Planning
28 Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted.
29 B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Count]\\lde Planning
30 Polic1es are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027.
31 C. The Phase II Amendments to the Kmg County 2012-Count) \\ide Planning
32 Policies are amended. as shovvn by Attachment I to Ordinance 12421
33 D The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countyvv1de Planmng
34 Policres are amended, as sho\.\n by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260
35 E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Count}\\lde Plannmg
36 Policres are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 4 to Ordmance 13415.
37 F. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Plannmg
38 Policies are amended, as sho'Wn by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858
39 G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
40 Pohcies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390
41 H. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Plannmg
42 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391.
2
Ordmance 16747
43 I. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Count) wide Planning
44 Polictes are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392.
45 J. The Phase II Amendments to the Kmg County 2012-Countywide Planning
46 Pohcies are amended. as shovvn by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14652
47 K. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-County'Mde Plannmg
48 Po!tcies are amended. as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordmance 14653.
49 L. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countyvvide Planning
50 Pohcies are amended. as sho\\ n by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14654
51 M. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
52 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment l to Ordinance 14655.
53 N. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywtde Planning
54 Policies are amended. as shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 14656.
55 0. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012-Count~ wide Planmng
56 Pohctes are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 14844
57 P. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-County\\tde Planning
58 Policies are amended as shown by Attachments A, B and C to Ordinance J 5121.
59 Q. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywtde Plannmg
' 60 I Po hctes are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15122.
I 61
I
I
62
R. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15 J 23.
I 63 I S. Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
I 64
II
Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments A and B to Ordmance 15426
I 3
Ordinance 16747
65 T. Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywtde Plannmg
66 Policies ate amended, as shown by Attachments A, B, and C to Ordinance 15709.
67 U. Phase II Amendments to the King County 20.12-County·vide Planning
68 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 16056.
69 V. Phase U Amendments to the Kmg County 2012 -County\\ ide Planning
70 Pohctes are amended. as shown by Attachments A, B, C, D, E, F and G to Otdmance
71 16151.
72 W. Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
73 Policies are amended as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 16334, and those items
7 4 numbered 1 though 11, 1 3 and 15 as shown on Attachment B to Ordinance I 63 34. ate
75 hereby ratified on behalf of the populatiOn of unincorporated King County. Those 1tems
76 numbered 12 and 14, shown as struck-through on Attachment B to Ordinance 16334. are
77 not ratified.
78 X Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Plannmg
79 Policies are amended as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 16335
80 Y. Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-County\\;tde Planning
81 Polictes are amended as shown by Attachment A to Ordmance 16336
82 Z. Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
83 Polictes are amended. as shown by Attachments A and B to this ordinance.
84 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, SectiOn 4, as amended, and K C. C. 20 I 0.040 are
85 each hereby amendd to read as follows.·
86 A. Countywide Plannmg Pohcies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes
87 specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.
4
Ord1nance 16747
88 B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Polictes adopted by Ordinance
89 I 0 840 are hereby ratJt!ed on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County
90 C. The amendments to the Count; wtde Plannmg Policies adopted by Ordmance
91 11061 are hereby rattt!ed on behalf of the population of unmcorporated King Count;
92 D. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 Countywtde Planning
93 Poltctes adopted by Ordmance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the populatJOn of
94 unmcorporated King County.
95 E. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies. as
96 shovm by Attachment I to Ordinance 12027 are hereby rattfied on behalf of the
97 populatiOn ofumncorporated King County.
98 F. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywtde Planning Policies. as
99 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421, are hereb; ratified on behalfofthe
100 populatiOn ofunmcorporated Kmg County
101 G. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies. as
102 shov.n by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby rattfiedon behalfofthe
103 population of unincorporated King County.
104 H The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planmng Policies, as
105 shown by Attachment I through 4 to Ordmance 13415, are hereby ratified on behalf of
106 the population of u-nincorporated King County.
107 I The amendments to the Kmg County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
108 shown by Attachments I through 3 to Ordinance 13858, are hereby ratified on behalf of
109 the population of unincorporated King County.
5
Ordinance 16747
110 J. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
111 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390, are hereby ratified on behalfofthe
112 populatJc:J. of unincorporated King County.
113 K. The amendments to the Kmg County 2012-Count)'\' ide Plaruung PoliCies, as
114 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordmance 14391, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
115 populatwn of unincorporated Kmg County.
116 L. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Plannmg Policies, as
117 shov. n by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14 3 92, are hereby rat1fied on behalf of the
118 population of unincorporated Kmg County.
119 M. The amendments to the Kmg County 2012-Countywide Planning Pohc1es. as
120 shO\vn by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14652, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
121 population of unincorporated King County.
122 N. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countyv. ide Plaru1m.g Policies, as
123 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 14653, are hereby ratified on behalf of
124 the populatiOn of unincorporated Kmg County.
125 0. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
126 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14654, are hereby ratified on behalf ofthe
127 population of unincorporated King County
128 P. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Plannmg Policies, as
129 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14655, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
130 population of unincorporated King County.
6
Ordmance 16747
131 Q. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Plannmg Polictes. as
132 shown by Attachments l and 2 to Ordmance 14656, are hereby rattfied on behalf of the
133 populatiOn ofumncorporated Kmg County.
134 R. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywtde Planmng Poltcies, as
135 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 14844, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
136 population of unincorporated King County
137 S. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planmng Po!tcies. as
138 shown by Attachments A, B and C to Ordinance 15121, ate hereby ratified on behalf of
139 the population ofw1incorporated King County.
140 T. The amendments to the Kmg County 2012-Count)'\vide Planning Policies. as
141 shO\\ n by Attachment A to Ordinance 15122, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
142 populatiOn of unincorporated King County.
143 U. The amendments to the Kmg County 2012-Count)'wtde Planmng Pohctes. as
144 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15123, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
145 populatiOn of unincorporated Kmg County.
146 V. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywtde Plannmg Po!tctes. as
147 shown by Attachments A and B to Ordmance 15426. are hereby rattfied on behalf of the
148 populatwn of unincorporated Kmg County.
149 W. The amendments to the Kmg County 2012-Countywide Planning PoliCJes.
150 as shown by Attachments A, B, and C to Ordinance 15709, are hereby ratified on behalf
151 of the population ofunincorporated Kmg County.
7
Ordmance 16747
152 X. The amendments to the King County 2012-County"" ide Planning Pohcies, as
153 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 16056 are hereby ratified on behalf of the
154 population of unincorporated King County
155 Y. The amendments to the Kmg County 2012-Countyvv1de Planmng Policies. as
156 shov.n by Attachments A. B. C, D, E, F and G to Ordinance 16151, are hereb) ratified on
157 behalf of the populatiOn of unincorporated King County.
158 Z. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countyvvide Planning Policies. as
159 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 16334, and those items numbe1ed I through 11. 13
160 and 15, as shown in Attachment B to Ordinance 16334, are hereby ratified on behalf of
161 the population of unincorporated King County. Those ltems numbered 12 and 14. shown
162 as struck-through on Attachment B to Ordinance 16334, are not ratilied.
163 AA. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countyv\ 1de Planning Polices,
164 as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 16335 are hereby rat1fied on behalfofthe
165 population of unincorporated King County
166 BB The amendment to the King County 2012 -Countyvvide Plannmg Policies.
167 as shown by Attachment A of Ordinance 16336, is hereby ratified on behalf of the
168 population of unincorporated Kmg County AdditiOnally. by Ordmance 16336, an
169 amendment to the Interim Potential Annexation Area Map to include any additional
170 unincorporated urban land created by the Urban Grov,;th Area (UGA) amendment in the
171 Potential Annexation Area of the city of Black Diamond IS hereby ratified on behalf of
172 the population ofunincorponted King County,
8
Ordtnance 16747
173 CC. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countvwide Planning Polictes.
174 as shown by Attachments A and B to this ordinance are hereby ratified on behalf of the
175 population ofumncorporated Kmg County
Ordmancc 16747 was introduced on 11/23/2009 and passed by the Metropolitan Kmg
County Council on 1125/2010, by the following vote
Yes: 8-Ms. D1ago. Mr Phillips, Mr. von Retchbauer. Ms. Hague,
Ms. Patterson, Ms. Lambert, Mr Ferguson and Mr Dunn
No: 0
Excused: 1 -Mr. Gossett
ATTEST:
Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council
KING COUNTY COUNCIL
KING COUNTY, \II ASHJNGTON
APPROVED thts q-P' day of fdJru6 f't . .aQli)
Dow Constantme County Executive
Attachments. A. Matton 09-1 B. Matton 09-2
9
-r
.r.. .. )
r> -,
(-: ~-.,
"I• -··: -...:: -·)
.5. ,-,
u c ::z: ,...,
~ = = ....,
f'l
•:0
I
Ul
-o
::&:
-~
0 c...n
.. # .... '
r-:~1
,----.
.... '
r~ I
---
'
--·
2
3
10/28/09
lth/pr
16747
Sponsored By:
4 MOTION NO. 09-1
2009-0641 Attachment A
Executive Committee
5 A MOTION to adopt a work plan and schedule to address the
6 policy framework for allocatwn of regwnal services and facilities.
7
8 WHEREAS, the Growth Management Planning Council has directed staff to develop
9 recommendations for a major update of the Countywide Planning Policies in 2010 to bring
10 those policies mto consistency wtth Vision 2040.
II
12 WHEREAS, the Growth Management Plannmg Council has developed proposed growth
I 3 targets for housing and employment, that implement the Regional Growth Strategy
14 contamed in VisiOn 2040 while providing 20-year targets for cities to use m the next round
15 of GMA comprehensive plan updates.
16
17 WHEREAS, since the Countywide Planning Policies were first adopted in 1992,
I 8 significant amounts of growth have occurred mside the urban growth area, within cities and
19 unincorporated King County, and particularly inside Cities with designated urban centers,
20 where pending growth targets would dtrect even greater amounts of growth .
21
22 BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF
23 KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS:
24
25 Direct staff to pursue a work plan for phase I of an update of the Countywide Planning
26 Policies.
27
28 Goal of Work Program:
29 The GMPC will update the Countywide Planning Pohcies to ensure consistency with the
30 Multi-County Planning Policies contamed WJthm VIsion 2040, to ensure consistency with
31 the State Grov.ih Management Act, to reflect current termmology and relevant references,
32 and to estabhsh the policy framework for advancing the Regional Growth Strategy through
33 prioritized allocation of regwnal services and facilities. Phase One of the work plan is
34 focused on estabhshing one or more Framework policies that will advance the Regional
35 Growth Strategy through pnoritized allocatiOn of regional services and facilities, whtle
36 continuir.g to serve all communities m Kmg County
37
38
39
I
I
'I
I
I
\
I
I
l
I
I
I
I
i'
il
I
j
I
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
2009-0641 Attachment A
Context:
With the adoption of the new growth targets, King County is facing an increased amount of
growth countywide and a pattern of growth that concentrates housmg and employment m
cities w!th Urban Centers. Communtties throughout the county recogmze that thetr ability
to accommodate growth depends on adequate provisiOn of servtces and factlittes Further,
a number of ctttes are concerned that the existing provtsion of servtces and facilities are
madequate to meet current needs. The first pnonty in developing the work program will
be to define the regwnal services and fact lines that are necessary to support growth.
Direct staff to develop options for new CPP policy language that will prionttze regwnal
servtee dell very in ways that promote the regtonal growth strategy In developmg that
policy, staff should address these tssues accordmg to the schedule shown below:
• Define what constltutes the "regional servtces" affected by this poltcy;
• Identify the existmg poltcy basis for delivering regwnal serv1ces,
• Draft new pohcy optwns that address reg10nal service delivery for GMPC
consideration by the end of the first quarter of2010.
S h d I fi fi h k d c e u e or urt er wor on propose po tcy optwns:
Task Due Date
Define regtonal services and facilities that are tied to growth 4'0 Qtr, 2009
Identify existing policy basis for future delivery of services and 4tll Qtr, 2009
facilities
Draft policy options for guidance on delivering regional services March 1, 2010
and facilittes
Present policy options to GMPC for ftrst reading and discussion End of 1 51 Qtr,
2010
Revise policy options as directed by GMPC Mid-April, 2010
Approval of policy amendment{s) and direction of next steps by Late Apnl, 20 lO
GMPC
58 Adopted by the Growth Management Plannmg Counctl ofKmg County on October 28,
59 2009 in open session, and stgned by the chair of the GMPC
60
61
62
63
64
r--------------------------------...
16747 2009-0641 Attachment B
10/28/09
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
/pr
Sponsored By: Executive Committee
MOTION NO. 09-2
A MOTION by the Growth Management Planning Council of Kmg
County recommending the amendment of the Countyw1de Planmng
Policies updatmg existing pohcies to prov1de for housing and
employment targets for the period 2006-2031. Th1s motion also
amends Table LU-1 of the Countywide Plannmg Pohcies by replacmg
the ex1stmg Household and Employment Growth Targets for the
2001-2022 penod Wlth new Housing and Employment Growth
Targets for the 2006-2031 period
13 WHEREAS, in accordance with the Growth Management Act (GMA), the 2002
14 Countywide Plarmmg Policies established household and employment targets for each city
15 and for King County through 2022; and
16
17 WHEREAS, the 2002 targets need to be updated to reflect projected growth through 2031
18 in accordance Wlth the GMA (RCW 36 70A 110); and
19
20 WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policy FW-3 states that the adopted household and
21 employment targets shall be monitored by Kmg County annually with adjustments made by
22 the Growth Management Plarming Counc1l utlhzing the process established in FW -1, Step
23 6, and
24
25 WHEREAS since June, 2008 staff from King County and the cities in King County have
26 worked cooperatively to analyze and recommend new 20-year housing and employment
27 targets; and
28
29 WHEREAS the Growth Management Planning Council met and discussed the updates of
30 the housmg and employment growth targets for the period 2006-2031, with opportunity for
31 pubhc comment on Apnl 15, 2009, July 15, 2009 and September 16, 20U9.
32
,---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~ I
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
I
43
44
45
46
t 47
I 48
II 49 I
I 50
l 51
h 52
I 53
! 54
55
I 56
,, 57 ',
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
2009-0641 Attachment B
BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF
KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES TO AMEND THE POLICIES, TEXT, AND TABLE
LU-I OF THE COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES AS FOLLOWS.
C. Urban Areas
The followrng policies establish an Urban Growth Area (UGA), determine the amount of
hauseheM housrng and employment growth to be accommodated wlthrn the UGA in the
form of targets for eachjunsd1ctwn, and 1dentify methods to phase development w1thrn thrs
area m order to bring certarnty to long-term planmng and development w1thin the County
All cztzes are mc/uded m the UGA, with the c!lzes in the Rural Area zdentified as Islands of
urban growth The UGA IS a permanent deszgnation. Land outstde the UGA is deszgnated
for permanent rural and resource uses Countywzde Polzcies on Rural and Resource Areas
are found in Chapter IliA, Resource Lands, and Chapter !JIB, Rural Areas
In accordance with the State Growth Management Act (GMA) (.RCW 36 70A.IJO), the State
Office of Fmancial Management (OFM) provzdes a population projection to each county
The county, through a collaboratrve mtergovernmental process established by the Growth
Management Planning Counczl, allocates the population as growth targets to rndivzdual
JUrisdictions. Forecasts prepared by the Puget Sound Regwnal Councrl are used to
establish the county employment proJection.
The process for allocating growth targets in King County is a collaborative exercise
mvolving rnput (rom the county and c1tres The allocatwns determined through thrs process
are to be guzded by exrstmg relevant policies at the revonal. countywide. and local levels
and are to take into account best ava!lable data on (actors influencrng fUture growth m the
region as felJaws
I The PSRC emple]>mel~t J~."Ceests tN'e ealerJaterif~r #he JfJur geegFtiphie sub£1Feas efihe
UGA (See ShBFe, &uih, Erut, emlRHF£11 CiNes). These then beeeme subarea
employme11t ttlrgets.
2 Thejurisdietwi'IS ea!ket-i';ely· alloeete the OFAfpepu!Citienp&jeetien 1<7 thefoHF
suh11rees h11serien thep1'6]eetedempleymentfar eaeh area A small emeunl ef
papulatwn growth is ess!imeri te eeeur U'l the RuFal tl1'Ca
3. The teehmcalsttfjftrtmS!atf!s the papuitlttal~ prajeetzoi'IS int-e prejeetf!d he~tSeheltis,
t£Jku1g mte £1eeaunt fiijjCrent average heuseheiri Sli'ies wzthi!~ e11eh sub11rea These
pra_]eetzens then beeeme subarea heusehel-d tffl'gels
4. Jwistiietie1w within etwh subarea negatiate the distributien r:rfsubtUee heuseheld (fflri
empleJ>•ment targets uszng BFiteria beseri on Ceuntywirie P!£Jnning Pelzczes
The housing and employment capacrty rn the UGA, based on adopted plans and regulations,
should accommodate the projected 20-year growth Growth IS to be accommodated withm
permanent Urban Areas by mcreasmg densities, as needed Phasmg should occur wzthrn
the UGA, as necessary, to ensure that services are prowded as growth occurs.
--------------------------------------------
2009-0641 Attachment B
77 FW-11 The land use pattern for Kmg County shall protect the natural environment by
78 reducing the consumptwn ofland and concentrating development An Urban
79 Growth Area, Rural Areas, and resource lands shall be destgnated and the
&0 necessary implementing regulat10ns adopted. Th1s mcludes Countywide estab-
81 lishment of a boundary for the Urban Growth Area Local junsd1ctwns shall
82 make land use decisions based on the Countywide Planmng Policies
83
84 FW-12 The Urban Growth Area shall provide enough land to accommodate future urban
85 development Polic1es to phase the provision of urban servtces and to ensure
86 efficient use of the growth capacity withm the Urban Growth Area shall be
87 mstJ.tuted.
88
89 FW -12(a) All jurisdictions within King County share the responsibility to accommodate the
90 20-year populatiOn projection and~ employment forecast. The populatiOn
91 projeetion shall !Je OSSigned to the four sllilareas of King County (Sea Shore, eO:St,
92 South and the Rural Cities) proportiOnate with the shore of proJeeted employmeltt
93 grow+.h. Anticipated growth shall be allocated pursuant to the followmg
94 objectives:
95 a. To plan for a pattern of growth that is guided by the Regional Growth
96 Strategy contamed in Vision 2040. the growth management, transportatiOn,
97 and economic development plan for the 4-county central Puget Sound region:
98 b To ensure effictent use of land wtthin the UGA by directing growth to Urban
99 Centers and Activity Centers,
100 c. To hmtt development in the Rural Areas;
101 d. To protect designated resource lands,
102 e. To ensure efficient use of infrastructure,
103 f. To improve the jobs/housing balance wtthin the county on a subarea lo!asis;
104 g. To promote a land use pattern that can be served by public transportation and
105 other alternatives to the single occupancy vehicle; and
I 06 h. To provide sufficient opportunities for growth within the junsd1ctions.
107
108 FW-12(b) The growth targets established pursuant to the methodology descnbed in LU-25c
109 and LU-25d shall be supported by both regional and local transportatton
110 investments. The availability of an adequate transportation system is cntically
Ill important to accommodating growth. The regional responstbtltty shall be met by
112 plannmg for and delivenng county, state, and federalmvestments that support the
113 growth targets and the land use pattern of the County. This includes mvestments
1 14 in transit, state highways m key regional transportation corridors, and m improved
115 access to the designated Urban Centers. The local responsibility shall be met by
116 local transportatiOn system investments that support the achievement of the
117 targets.
118 FW-lZ(c) Ensuring suffictent water supply is essential to accommodate growth and
119 conserve fish habitat. Due to the substantial lead-time required to develop water
120 supply sources, infrastructure and management strategies, long-term water supply
121 planning efforts in the Region must be ongomg.
122
1.----------------------------------------------------~ I
I
I
(
r
' I
1\
l
I
I
I)
I
l
I
l
I
.\
I
I
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
!54
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
2009-0641 Attachment B
I . Urban Growth Area
The Growth Management Act requires King County to designate an Urban Growth Area
zn consultatiOn wzth crties The Countywide Planmng Policies must establzsh an Urban
Growth Area that contams enough urban land to accommodate at least 20 years of new
populatzon and employment growth. The Growth Management Act states "based upon
the population forecast made for the County by the Office of Financial Management, the
Urban Growth Areas in the County shall mclude areas and densztzes sufficzent to permit
urban growth that rs proJected to occur m the County for the succeeding 20-year penod.
Each Urban Growth Area shall permzt urban densztres and shall znclude greenbelt and
open space areas." An Urban Growth Area map rs attached as Appendix 1, which gwdes
the adoption of the 1994 Metropolitan King County Comprehenszve Plan
LU-25a Each jurisdiction shall plan for and accommodate the hot~seho!d housing and
employment targets estabhshed pursuant to LU-25c and LU-25d. Tills obligation
includes:
a. Ensuring adequate zoning capacity; and
b. Planning for and de1ivenng water, sewer, transportation and other
infrastructure, in concert with federal and state mvestments and recognizing
where applicable special purpose districts; and
c Accommodating increases in hottsehold housing and employment targets as
annexations occur.
The targets Will be used to plan for and to accommodate growth within each
JUnsdJctton. The targets do not obhgate a junsd1ctton to guarantee that a given
number of housing units will be built or JObs added dunng the plannmg penod.
LU-25b Growth targets for each Potential Annexatwn Area shall be set as a proportional
share of the overall Urban Unincorporated Area target commensurate With the
PAA's share of total Unincorporated Urban Area housing and employment
capacity determined m the most recent Buildable Lands Report. As annexations
or incorporations occur, growth targets shall be adjusted. Household Housing
and employment targets for each jurisdiction's potential armexation area, as
adopted in Table LU-1, shall be transferred to the annexing jurisdiction or newly
mcorporated city as follows:
a. King County and the respective city Will determine new housing househelEI
and employment targets for areas under consideration for annexatwn prior to
the submtttal of the annexation proposal to the King County Boundary
Review Board,
b. A city's fiottsefiold housing and employment targets shall be increased by a
share of the target for the potential annexation area proportionate to the share
of the potential annexation area's development capacity located within the
area annexed In the case of incorporatwn, an equivalent formula shall be
used to establish household housing and employment targets for the new city.
2009-0641 Attachment B
168 Each city w1ll determine how and where within their corporate boundaries to
169 accommodate target mcreases;
170 c. The County's unincorporated Urban areas targets shall be correspondingly
171 decreased to ensure that overall target levels m the county remam the same;
172 d The household housing and employment targets in Table LU-1 Will be
173 updated penodically to reflect changes due to annexations or incorporatiOns.
17 4 These target updates do not require adoptwn by the Growth Management
175 Planning Council.
176
177 LU -25c The target objectives identified in FW-12a shall be realized through the following
178 methodology for allocating housmg lisHsehold targets·
179
t 80 a Determme the additional population that must be accommodated countywide
181 by ealeHiatu'lg the drffereaee bet\veea the fftsst reeern CeHsus csurn and the
182 State Office sffiaaneial Maaageffteat pspulatwn prsjeetion for the end of
183 during the twenty year plannmg penod based on the range of population
184 pro1ectwns made bv the State Office of Fmancial Management for the county
185 and 4-county central Puget Sound region and guided by the Regional Growth
186 Strategy contained in Vis10n 2040,
187 b. Subtraet a pereeatage from tfiat HHffl:!Jer to represeltt the amolffit ofgrovA:h
188 that is ess~:~fftea to oeeur ill the tmineofPeratea RHral , \rea;
189 b. Assign proportions of the BFbatt countvw1de population growth to each of six
190 Regwnal Geographies as defined by Vision 2040 to include Metropolitan
!9! Crties, Core C1t1es, Larger Cities, Small C1tJes, Unincorporated Urban
I 92 Growth Areas, and Rural and Natural Resource Lands the fuur s~:~!Jareas (Sea
193 Shere, South, east, aad Rural CttJes) based OR fue proportion offutl:lre
194 ernp!o}'ffteat gmwili forecasted for each of those subareas by the Puget Souad
195 Regional CoHncil,
196 c_ Allocate population growth to each Regional Geography as guided by Vision
197 2040 and also taking into account additional factors;
198 d. Assume that a small amount of population growth, approximately 3% to 4%
199 of the countywide total, will occur in the Rural area;
200 e. Convert the estimated projected population for each s~:~bareeUrban Regional
201 Geography to an estimated number of aeliseholds housing units needed,
202 using projected average household s1zes, group quarters population, and
203 vacancy rates ili:at refleet the '• ariatwn Gffloflg those slibarea;:; ebserYed IH tlie
204 ffiOst reeeat Cens\:!5,
205 f. Allocate a he1:!5effi>ld housing target to mdividual Jurlsdictions, within each
206 sHbarea Regional Geography, based on FW-12a and considering the
207 following factors·
208 L the availabihty of water and the capacity of the sewer system;
209 2. the remaining portions of previously adopted hcusehold targets;
210 3. the presence of urban centers and activity areas within each jurisdiction;
2 I 1 4_ the availability of zoned development capacity in each jurisdiction; and
212 5. the apparent market trends for housing in the area_
213 f. Jurisdictions shall plan for housing aeHsehold targets as adopted in Table LU-
214 1; and
\
I
I
\
t
f
r
[
I
I
i
J
I
(
t
I
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
2009-0641 Attachment 8
g. Monitoring should follow the process described in policy FW-1.
A portzon of the urban employment growth w1ll occur m Act1v1ty Areas and neighborhoods
in the Urban Area Th1s employment growth will support the Urban Centers, while
balancmg local employment opportumties m the Urban Area
LU-25d The target objectives identified in FW-12a shall be realized through the following
methodology for allocating employment targets:
a. Determme the number of jobs that must be accommodated in eaeh ofthe four
subareas ofKmg County (Sea Shore, 8outh, East, aad the Rt~ral Cities) IR
aecordaRce with the most reeeRt P8RC JOb estimates 8fld forecasts for during
the 20-year plannmg penod based on the most recent forecast of employment
growth produced by the Puget Sound Regional Council for the four-county
central Puget Sound region, and guided by the Regional Growth Strategy
contained in Vision 2040. To aecooot for ooeertainty in the employment
foreeasts, establish a range of new jobs that mlist be aeeommodated in each
slibarea. URiess ellceptional eireiDR:stimees dictate, the fBflge shotild be 5% on
either stde of the P8RC forecast.
b. Assign proport1ons of the countyw1de employment growth to each of six
Regional Geographies as defined by Vision 2040 to mclude Metropolitan
Cttles, Core Cities, Larger Ctties, Small Cities, Unincorporated Urban Growth
Areas, and Rural and Natural Resource Lands;
c. Allocate employment growth to each Reg10nal Geography as guided bv
Vision 2040 and also takmg into account addttional factors;
d. Assume that a small amount of employment growth, less than 1% of the
countywtde totaL will occur in the Rural area;
e. Allocate an employment target to indivtdual Jurisdictions, within each Urban
Regional Geography, based on FW-12a and considenng the following factors:
b. For eaeb: subarea; determine the poiRt within the range upon ·;,<hieh
jllfiSeiet!OnS •.vithin the Sliearea will ease tfteir targets aRd al!oeate
employment grewtb: targets to iRdiYidual jurisdietions based oR eonsideratwn
ofthe follo• ... ~Rg:
1. the PSRC small area forecasts;
2. the presence of urban centers, manufacturing/industrial centers, and
activity areas within each jurisdiction;
3. the availability of zoned commercial and industrial development capacity
in each Jurisdiction and;
4. the access to transit, as well as to existing highways and arterials.
c. Jurisdictions shall plan for employment targets as adopted m Table LU-I.
260
262
264
266
268
270
2009-{)641 Attachment B
~:~r.~~:~r;~~~rK7l!~~t~~if;r~;1tmt~t~~;~m~7-{~~~~*{i~~~:~[ -~T=!.~?K::
Reg~naiGeography Housing PAA Hous119 frr4>~yment PAA fn1>10yrrent
C1ty I Subarea ~rget Target Target Target
Net New Units Net New Urn13 Net New Jobs Net New Jobs
Metropoitan Otles
eetlevue 17,000 290 53,000
Seattle 86,000 146,700
Subtotal 103,000 199r700
Core Obes
At.OOm 9,620 19,350 -
Bothell 3,000 810 4,800 200
lmen 3,900 4,600
Federal Way 8,100 2,390 12,300 290
Kent 7,800 1,560 13,200 290
Kirkland 7,200 1,370 20,200 650
Redmood 10,200 640 23,000
Renton 14,835 3,895 29,000 470
SeaTac 5,800 25,300
Tukw1la 4,800 50 15,500 2,050
Subtmt 75,255 167,250
Largll!!r cties
Des Momes 3,000 5,000
Issaquah 5,750 290 20,000
J<enmore 3,500 3,000
Maple Valley*• 1,800 1,060 2,000
Mercer Island 2,000 1,000
Sammam1sh 4,000 350 !,BOO
Shore tine 5,000 5,000
Woo<i!NIIIe 3,000 5,000
Subtotal 28,050 42,800
Sn&l CltJes
Algona 190 210
Beaux: Arts 3 3
Black aaroond 1,900 1,050
Carnatlon 330 370
Clyde Hll 10
(O\IIngton 1,470 1,320
DINa II 1,140 840
Enumclaw l,425 735
Hunts Point 1 -
Lakl! Forest Park 475 210
Me<ina 19 .
Mdton 50 90 160
Newcastle 1,200 735
r.brmandy Park: 120 65
Nortn Bend 665 1,050
Pacf/C 285 135 370
Sl<ykorrnsh 10 .
Snoqualmie 1,615 1,050
Yarrow Point 14 .
Subtotal 10,922 8,168
1.1-ban U.O.Corporated
Potenttal Annex:at:Jon Areas 12,930 3,950
Nor1h H\1lllne 1,360 2,530
Bear Creek lPD 910 3,580
Unda•med Urban UmrlCO(porated 650 90
SUbtotal 15.3SG 10,150
l<ing County tlil. Total 233,on 428,068
------~ ---------------~-------___ :_ -----------•-----___ __J _______ --
~-!~~!S-~~~~.,:s 2~ .f!!!!l?t:f tar~~ have ~en -~~ed to !~~~ne)(atJo~_!l_!~ ~~--J ____
•• Target ror Maple VaHey PAA conbngent on approval of cty-coooty Joint plan for S1n1m1t Place I
t
\
I,
l
I .'f
I
r
l
I I
I
t
\
I
I
I
r
'
I
I
r
f
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
2009-0641 Attachment B
ADOPTED by the Growth Management Plannmg Council of King County on October 28,
2009 in open sessiOn, and signed by the chair of the GMPC.