HomeMy WebLinkAbout3905ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City
of Kent, Washington, amending the Kent
Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities Element
to reflect a six-year plan for capital improvement
projects (2009-2014) (CPA -2008-5).
RECITALS
A. The State of Washington Growth Management Act ("GMA")
requires internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements and the
plans from other jurisdictions.
B. To assure that comprehensive plans remain relevant and up to
date, the GMA allows amendments to the capital facilities element of
comprehensive plans concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a city
budget (RCW 36.70A.130(2)(a)(iii)).
C. The City of Kent has established procedures for amending the
Comprehensive Plan in Chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code, allowing
amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan
concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the City's budget and
allowing the City Council to hold the public hearing instead of the Land Use
and Planning Board,
1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
to the Capital Facilities Element for
2009-2014 Capital improvements
D. The City of Kent Finance Department has submitted proposed
amendments to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to
identify a six-year plan for capital improvement projects, including costs and
revenue sources.
E. After providing appropriate public notice, the City Council of the
City of Kent conducted a public hearing on October 21, 2008, to consider the
six-year plan for capital improvements and the requested amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities Element.
F. On September 16, 2008, the City provided the State of
Washington the required sixty (60) day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 of
the City's proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the
Comprehensive Plan. The sixty (60) day notice period has lapsed.
G. On December 9, 2008, the City Council for the City of Kent
approved the Capital Facilities Element amendment to the Kent
Comprehensive Plan (CPA -2008-5) to reflect a six-year plan for capital
improvement projects (2009-2014).
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT,
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE
SECTION 1. - Amendment. The City of Kent Comprehensive Plan and
its Capital Facilities Element are hereby amended to reflect a six-year plan for
capital improvement projects (2009-2014), as set forth in Exhibit "A"
attached and incorporated by this reference (CPA -2008-5).
2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
to the Capital Facilities Element for
2009-2014 Capital Improvements
SECTION 2. - Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections,
or sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance
and the same shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 3. - Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be
in force thirty (30) days from and after the date of passage as provided by
law. _
ATTEST;
1z' 7 (��-
BRENDA JACOBER, CI CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Aq Ok- ��l P I
TIM BRU AKER, CITY ATTORNEY
COOKE, MAYOR
3 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
to the Capital Facilities Element for
2009-2014 Capital Improvements
PASSED: day of December, 2008.
APPROVED: day of December, 2008.
PUBLISHED: 13 day of December, 2008.
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. 2?,9 5
passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by
the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated.
(SEAL)
BRENDA JACO ,CITY CLERK
P 1CIvillOrdinancelCompPlanAmend-Cap italImprovePlan2009-2014 docs
r
4 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
to the Capital Facilities Element for
2009-2014 Capital Improvements
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
The CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) is a
six year plan developed and updated annually
Included is a listing of Capital Improvement
Projects for 2009 to 2014.
2009-2014 CIP Sources of Funds 32
2009-2014 CIP Projects Forecast 33
2009-2014 Capital Improvement Program 34
2009 - 2014 Capital Improvement Program
Sources of Funds
Amounts in 000's
Sources To Be
Determined
Bond Proceeds 4%
10%
Grant
8%
Facilities Fund
2%
Utility Funds
36%
Capital
Improvement Fund
35%
0 t CCI mound 5%
Sources of Funds
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Total
Capital Improvement Fund
6,167
8,446
13,204
10,699
4,719
5,502
48,737
Street Fund
1,781
2,759
1.424
714
674
35
7,387
Utility Funds
8,194
10,465
8,876
8,183
9,886
5,668
51,272
Facilities Fund
510
635
625
675
650
725
3,820
Grants
80
5,060
1.005
1,705
805
2,205
10,860
Bond Proceeds
7,800
6,000
-
-
-
-
13,800
Sources To Be Determined
3,466
835
215
215
165
140
5,036
Total Sources of Funds
27,998
34,200
25,349
22,191
16,899
14,275
140,912
2009 - 2014 Capital Improvement Program
Projects Forecast
Amounts in 000's
Utility Fund Projects
36%
Transportation
9%
General Government
12%
Public Safety
23%
Parks, Recreation &
Community Services
20%
Projects
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Total
Transportation
4,846
4,774
1,389
714
639
35
12 397
Public Safety
9,706
4,925
9,333
6,953
528
528
31 973
Parks Recreation
3.362
6,226
3,891
4.516
3,966
6 224
28 185
& Community Services
General Government
1,855
7,810
1,825
1,825
1,845
1,820
16.980
Utility Fund Projects
8,229
10,465
8,911
8,183
9,921
5 668
51 377
Total Projects 27,998 34,200 25,349 22,191 16,899 14,275 140,912
General Government
2009 - 2014 Capital Improvement Program
Amounts in Thousands
Sources of Funds
LTGO Bonds
CIP Revenues
Facilities Revenues
Source To Be Determined
Total Sources of Funds
Projects Funded
Facilities
Emergency Facility Repairs (Lifecycle)
Floor Covering Replacements (Lifecycle)
Sealcoat Parking Lots (Lifecycle)
HVAC Lifecycle Replacements (Lifecycle)
Facilities Card Access
Fire Station Grounds Renovation
Golf Course Improvements
Technology
Software Business System Replacements
Hardware Lifecycle Replacements
Tech Plan 2008 - 2012
Connected Community
Other General Government
Neighborhood Programs
Total Projects Funded
Total
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
580
6,000
60
6,000
125
100
150
540
7,035
1,220
1,175
1,200
1,150
1,195
1,095
3,820
510
635
625
675
650
725
125
125
75
75
100
230
16,980
1,855
7,810
1,825
—1
1,845
1,820
900
150
150
150
150
150
150
580
60
60
85
125
100
150
540
125
90
100
100
125
1,800
300
300
300
300
300
300
455
130
75
75
75
100
230
40
50
25
25
45
45
200
25
25
75
25
25
25
3,000
500
500
500
500
500
500
2,700
450
450
450
450
450
450
6,000
6,000
125
125
450
75
75
75
75
75
75
16,980
1,855
7,810
1,825
1,825
1,845
1,820
Public Safety
2009 - 2014 Capital Improvement Program
Amounts in Thousands
Total
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013 2014
Sources of Funds
LTGO Bonds
7,800
7,800
CIP Revenues
23.973
1,706
4,925
9,333
6,953
528 528
Source To Be Determined
200
200
Total Sources of Funds
31.973
9,706
4.925
9,333
6,953
528 528
Projects Funded
Technology
Public Safety MDC Replacements
1,170
195
195
195
195
195 195
Fire and Emergency Services
Exhaust Extraction Systems
15
15
Security Fences
150
88
62
Remodel Washington Ave Fire Station
6,825
500
6,325
Replacement Fire Hose
93
16
16
16
16
16 16
Breathing Apparatus Replacement Program
945
158
158
158
158
158 158
Fire Equipment Replacement Fund
770
220
110
110
110
110 110
Replacement Radio Fund
525
400
125
Police Services
CKCF Renovation
3,650
450
3,200
Inmate Barcode Scan/Kiosk
40
40
Patrol AudioNideo Recording Equipment
150
75
75
Reader Board Speed Signs Project
50
25
25
Police Plate Carrier Project
30
30
2 Unmarked Detective Vehicles
60
60
Automated License Plate Readers -Council
70
70
Portable Radios -Replacement
300
50
50
50
50
50 50
Crime Scene Van Replace mnt/Eguip Upgrade
75
75
Pursuit Intervention Technique Equipment
25
25
Satellite Processing of Traffic NOls
200
30
100
70
AR -15 Rifles
75
75
Police/Fire Training Center
Expansion Police!F<re Training Center
8,640
750
7,890
Training Center Classroom Upgrades
50
25
25
Citywide Driving Simulator
150
150
Other Public Safety
Municipal Court Building Expansion
7,800
7,800
Camera Upgrade/Renovations
30
30
Annex Furniture Upgrades
25
25
Public Safety
2009 - 2014 Capital Improvement Program
Amounts in Thousands
Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Work Crew Van/Trailer Equipment 60 60
Total Projects Funded 3 9973 9 706 4,925 9,333 6.953 528 528
Transportation
2009 - 2014 Capital Improvement Program
Amounts in Thousands
Sources of Funds
Federal Grant
WA State Grant
Local Improvement District
Street Revenues
Total Sources of Funds
Projects Funded
Arterials
East Valley Highway (SR 167 - 212th)
1 st Avenue North Improvements
4th Avenue North Improvements
248th Street Improvements
2nd Avenue Pedestrian Improvements
Intersections
124th Avenue Improvements
Other Transportation
Miscellaneous Asphalt Overlays
Transit Now Partnership Program
Neighborhood Traffic Control
Shopper Shuttle
Street Channelization Program
Pavement Rating Survey
Total Projects Funded
Total
2009
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
1,940
1,940
150
75
75
3,026
3,026
1,000
7,282
1,746
2,759 1,389 714 639 35
12,397
4,846
4,774 1,389 714 639 35
5,264
2,964
2,300
750
500
250
1,000
1,000
1,250
500
375
375
332
332
1,250
500
375
375
1,500
500
500
500
260
260
150
75
75
210
35
35
35
35
35 35
356
89
89
89
89
75
15
15
15
15
15
12,397
4,846
4,774
1.389
714
639 35
Parks, Rec & Comm Services
2009 - 2014 Capital Improvement Program
Amounts in Thousands
Total
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Sources of Funds
WA State Grant
7,550
2,400
950
1,200
800
2,200
King County Grant
50
50
Other Grant
1,170
5
595
55
505
5
5
Donations 1 Contributions
61
11
10
10
10
10
10
CIP Revenues
1,700
700
100
100
100
100
600
CIP REET2 Revenues
16,029
2,541
2,246
2,571
2,496
2,896
3,279
Source To Be Determined
1,625
105
825
205
205
155
130
Total Sources of Funds
28,185
3,362
6,226
3.891
4 516
3,966
6,224
Projects Funded
Facilities
Parks Maintenance Renovation
25
25
Kent Pool Improvements
250
250
Community Parks
Valley Floor Athletic Complex Acq & Dev
500
500
Riverwalk/Riverview Park Development
130
130
Urban Forestry Program
60
10
10
10
10
10
10
Demolition of Rental Houses
25
25
Uplands Playfield Parking/Street Improv
250
250
East Hill Skate Park (Debt Service)
48
8
8
8
8
8
8
Kent Parks Foundation
150
25
25
25
25
25
25
Adopt -A -Park Volunteer Program
240
40
40
40
40
40
40
Commons Neighborhood Park
30
30
Van Doren's Park Improvements
300
150
150
Service Club Community Park
200
200
Clark Lake Development
1,050
50
1,000
Wilson Playfields Acquisition/Renovation
2,000
500
1,500
East Hill Park Land Acquisition
825
325
500
First Avenue Plaza
36
36
Lake Meridian Park Ren & Master Plan
1,300
100
1,200
Regional/Local Dog Off Leash Park
300
50
250
Eagle Creek Park Development
1,200
1,000
200
Life Cycle - Trails
54
9
9
9
9
9
9
Town Square Plaza (Debt Service)
960
192
192
192
192
192
Russell Woods1228th Corr Park/Trailhead
150
150
West Fenwick Park Renovation
1,500
1,500
International Parks Acq )'Development
50
50
Parks, Rec & Comm Services
2009 - 2014 Capital Improvement Program
Amounts in Thousands
Community Sports Fields
Lifecycle Renovations
L.fe Cycle - Play Equipment
Life Cycle - Ballfieids
Life Cycle - Irrigation
Life Cycle - Infield Sod
Event Center Lifecycle
Life Cycle Park System
Neighborhood Parks
Tudor Square Renovations
Clark Lake Land Acquisition
132nd Street Paris Development
West Hill Park Development
Springwood Park Improvements
Kiwanis Tot Lot #1 Improvements
S 272nd St Neighborhood Park Develop
Planning, Architect, Engineer
Comprehensive Park & Recreation Plan
Glenn Nelson Park Improvements
Lake Fenwick Park Improvements
Master Plans
Architect'Engineering
Other Parks, Rec & Comm Svc
Service Club Ballfields (Debt Service)
Wilson Playfields (Debt Service)
Grant Matching Furds/Land Acq
Eagle Scout Volunteer Program
Total Projects Funded
Total
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2,200
250
1,250
200
500
300
50
50
50
50
50
50
175
25
50
25
25
25
25
150
25
25
25
25
25
25
150
25
25
25
25
25
25
1,800
300
300
300
300
300
300
2,076
346
346
346
346
346
346
100
100
2,000
1,000
1,000
2,100
100
1,700
300
1,785
115
1,670
65
65
75
75
100
100
15
15
100
100
275
100
50
125
150
25
25
25
25
25
25
60
10
10
10
10
10
10
1,400
280
280
280
280
280
846
141
141
141
141
141
141
450
75
75
75
75
75
75
180
30
30
30
30
30
30
28,185
3,362
6,226
3,891
4.516
3.966
6.224
Utilities
2009 - 2014 Capital Improvement Program
Amounts in Thousands
r
Total
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Sources of Funds
Street Revenues
105
35
35
35
Water Revenues
30,890
2.842
7,221
5,455
5,425
7,051
2,896
Sewer Revenues
7,505
2,835
1,500
1,635
500
535
500
Drainage Revenues
12,877
2,517
1,744
1,786
2,258
2,300
2,272
Total Sources of Funds
51,377
8,229
10,465
8,911
8 183
9,921
5 668
Projects Funded
Stormwater Management
Socs Creek Basin Improvements
3,500
1,000
500
500
500
500
500
Mill Creek
2,950
200
250
250
750
750
750
NPDES
1,437
222
229
236
243
250
257
Miscellaneous Drainage Improvement
1,590
265
265
265
265
265
265
Riverview Park
250
250
Drainage Infrastructure Replacements
3,000
500
500
500
500
500
500
Miscellaneous Wetland Facility Upgrade
45
45
Sanitary Sewer
Miscellaneous Sewer Replacements
6,000
1,400
1,500
1,600
500
500
500
Kentview Interceptor
600
600
Skyline Interceptor
800
800
Water Supply & Distribution
Rock Creek Mitigation Protects
1,532
185
185
185
185
396
396
Large Meter & Vault Replacement
403
72
76
80
85
90
Miscellaneous Water Improvements
2,840
340
500
500
500
500
500
East Hill Pressure Zone
14,000
500
1,500
4,000
4,000
4,000
Hydrant Replacement Program
150
30
30
30
30
30
East Hill Water Supply Assessment
150
150
3 5MG East Hill Reservoir
5,400
1,000
4,400
Tacoma Pipeline
6,310
530
530
625
625
2,000
2,000
Combined Utilities
Aerial Flight
420
140
140
140
Total Projects Funded
51,377
8,229
10,465
8,911
8 183
9.921
5.668
•
KENT
WAS H E N G T O N
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Fred N. Satterstrom, AICP, Director
PLANNING SERVICES
Charlene Anderson, AICP, Manager
Phone: 253-856-5454
Fax: 253-856-6454
Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S.
Kent, WA 98032-5895
CITY OF KENT
ADDENDUM TO THE KENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
Responsible Official: Charlene Anderson
SCOPE
The City of Kent has completed environmental analysis, pursuant to the State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), for an amendment of the Capital Facilities
Element of the Comprehensive Plan to Include the City's 2009-2014 Capital
Improvement Plan (CIP). This amendment to the Capital Facilities Element is
occurring concurrently with the adoption of the City's 2009 operating budget
as provided by RCW 36.70A.130.
The GMA requires cities and counties to approve and maintain a six (6) year
capital facilities plan which includes requirements for specific types of capital
facilities, measurable levels -of -service (LOS) standards, financial feasibility,
and assurance that adequate facilities are provided as population and
employment growth occurs. Kent's annual budget document and six-year
CIP fulfill the GMA requirement for facilities planning. In addition, these
documents serve as a foundation for the city's fiscal management and
eligibility for grants and loans. The CIP and annual budget, along with the
Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan provide coordination
among the city's many plans for capital improvements. The annual budget
and six-year CIP contain broad goals and specific financial policies that guide
and Implement the provisions for adequate public services and facilities.
The six-year CTP is a funding mechanism to implement projects and
programs identified in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the
Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan contains goals and
policies related to the provision and maintenance of public services and
capital facilities which are necessary to support the projected growth over
the next twenty (20) years. The goals and policies of the Capital Facilities
Element are consistent with the Land Use, Transportation and Parks and
Open Space Elements.
The Comprehensive Plan EIS, draft and final, evaluated the growth potential
as identified in the City's Comprehensive Plan. The adoption of the six-year
CIP concurrently with the city's annual budget is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan EIS — Addendum
Capital Improvement Program 2009-2014
Comprehensive Plan EIS analysis as the types of projects and programs
identified in the CTP are specifically related to the growth projections in the
Comprehensive Plan and EIS.
SEPA COMPLIANCE
In October 1993, the City of Kent issued a Determination of Significance (DS)
and Notice of Scoping for the Comprehensive Plan (ENV -93-51). After a
series of public meetings, a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)
was issued on July 18, 1994 for the Draft Comprehensive Plan, issued on the
same date. The DEIS was distributed to City Council and Planning
Commission members, adjacent jurisdictions, affected agencies and other
parties of interest. After comments on the DEIS were solicited and reviewed,
a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) was issued and distributed
on January 30, 1995.
This Addendum to the Kent Comprehensive Plan EIS evaluates the adoption
of the six-year CIP. No additional impacts are identified since the CIP
implements projects and programs identified and evaluated in the City's
Comprehensive Plan and Comprehensive Plan EIS.
STATEMENT OF CONSISTENCY
Future projects associated with the CIP will be subject to and shall be
consistent with the following: City of Kent Comprehensive Plan, the Kent City
Code, International Fire Code, International Building Code, Public Works
Standards and all other applicable laws and ordinances in effect at the time a
complete project permit application is filed.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW — BACKGROUND
The City of Kent has followed the process of phased environmental review as
it undertakes actions to implement the Comprehensive Plan. The State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and rules established for the act, WAC 197-
11, outline procedures for the use of existing environmental documents and
preparing addenda to environmental decisions.
Nonproject Documents - An EIS prepared for a comprehensive plan,
development regulation, or other broad based policy documents are
considered "non -project," or programmatic in nature (see WAC 197-11-704).
These are distinguished from EISs or environmental documents prepared for
specific project actions, such as a building permit or a road construction
project. The purpose of a non -project EIS is to analyze proposed alternatives
and to provide environmental consideration and mitigation prior to adoption
of an alternative. It is also a document that discloses the process used in
evaluating alternatives to decision -makers and citizens.
Phased Review - SEPA rules allow environmental review to be phased so that
review coincides with meaningful points in the planning and decision making
process, (WAC 197-11-060(5)). Broader environmental documents may be
followed by narrower documents that incorporate general discussion by
reference and concentrate solely on issues specific to that proposal. SEPA
Page 2of4
Comprehensive Plan EIS - Addendum
Capital Improvement Program 2009-2014
rules also clearly state that agencies shall use a variety of mechanisms,
including addenda, adoption and incorporation by reference, to avoid
duplication and excess paperwork. Future projects identified and associated
with the implementation of the Capital Improvement Program may require
individual and separate environmental review, pursuant to SEPA. Such
review will occur when a specific project is identified.
Prior Environmental Documents - The City of Kent issued a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Comprehensive Plan on July
18, 1994 (#ENV -93-51). The DEIS analyzed three comprehensive plan land
use alternatives, and recommended mitigation measures, which were used in
preparing comprehensive plan policies. The preferred land use alternative
which was incorporated into the Comprehensive Pian was most closely
related to Alternative 2 of the DEIS, (the mixed-use alternative). A Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) was issued on January 30, 1995,
and the Comprehensive Plan was adopted by the City Council on April 18,
1995.
Scope of Addendum - As outlined in the SEPA rules, the purpose of an
addendum is to provide environmental analysis with respect to the described
actions. This analysis builds upon the Comprehensive Plan EIS but does not
substantially change the identified impacts and analysis; therefore it is
prudent to utilize the addendum process as outlined in WAC -197-11-
600(4)(c).
ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
All environmental elements were adequately addressed within the
parameters of the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan EIS, draft and final.
Further, subsequent "project" actions would require the submittal of separate
environmental checklists, pursuant to SEPA, which will be analyzed for
consistency with the original mitigating conditions and may require new
mitigation based upon site-specific conditions.
The adoption of the six-year CIP implements goals and policies identified in
the City's Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan, Specifically,
the CIP implements the following:
Goal CF -1 - As the City of Kent continues to grow and develop, ensure that
an adequate supply and range of public services and capital facilities are
available to provide satisfactory standards of public health, safety, and
quality of life.
Polrcy CF1.2 - Ensure that public services and capital facilities needs are
addressed in updates to the Capital Facilities Plans and Capital
Improvement Programs, and development regulations as appropriate.
Goal CF -4 -- Ensure that appropriate funding sources are available to acquire
or bond for the provision of needed public services and facilities.
Page 3 of 4
Comprehensive Plan EIS - Addendum
Capital Improvement Program 2009-2014
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION
SUMMARY
Kent City Code section 11.03.510 identifies plans and policies from which the
City may draw substantive mitigation under the State Environmental Policy
Act. This nonproject action has been evaluated in light of those substantive
plans and policies as well as within the overall analysis completed for the
City's Comprehensive Plan EIS.
DECISION
The City of Kent Comprehensive Plan EIS, draft and final, provided analysis
with regard to the Implementation of the Comprehensive Plan elements,
goals and policies. This includes the implementation of the Capital Facilities
Element and Capital Improvement Programs. The City has reviewed the
2009-2014 CIP and has found it to be consistent with the range, types and
magnitude of Impacts and corresponding mitigation outlined in the
Comprehensive Plan EIS. The adoption of the six-year CIP does not
substantially change any identified related impacts in the Comprehensive
Plan EIS.
This analysis and subsequent addendum did not identify any new significant
impacts associated with the adoption of the 2009-2014 CIP. Therefore, this
addendum, combined with the Comprehensive Plan EIS adequately evaluates
potential adverse environmental impacts and provides appropriate mitigation
for this nonproject action. Based upon this analysis, a separate threshold
determination is not required. This document and corresponding
environmental record may be utilized in the future in conjunction with
environmental review for future projects identified in the CIP in accordance
with the guidelines provided by WAC 197-11,
Dated: October 14, 2008 Signature: 40W,W? AG-Twq
---F Charlene Anderson, AICD, Responsible Official
CAJm\\5.\Permit\Plan\Ery\2008\CIPaddendum2009-2014 doc
Page 4of4
•
KENT
WAS MIMGTUN
ADOPTION OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS
Adoption Document( ): EIS
Description of current proposal: The action proposed by the City consists of the
adoption of an updated Capital Improvement Program concurrent with the 2009 city
operating budget. The Capital Improvement Plan is an element of the City's
Comprehensive Pian.
Proponent: City of Kent
Location of proposal: The proposal is a city-wide action.
Title of documents) being adopted: City of Kent Comprehensive Plan
Environmental Impact Statement Draft (July 1994) and Final (January 1995) -
Prepared by the City of Kent.
Description of document (or portion) being adopted: The City of Kent
Comprehensive Plan EIS is being adopted in total. This document evaluated three
different land use alternatives for the city. The analysis evaluated the type and
range of impacts to the environment associated with each land use alternative and
associated development regulations,
If the document has been challenged (WAC 197-11-630), please describe: The
document was not challenged.
Document availability: This document is available for review at the City of Kent
Planning Services office, 400 West Gowe, Kent, WA 98032 from 8:00 am to 5:00
pm.
We have identified and adopted this document as being appropriate for this
proposal after independent review. Along with the addendum, this document meets
our environmental review needs for the current proposal and will accompany the
proposal to the decisionmaker(s).
Name of agency adopting the document: City of Kent
Contact person/Responsible Official: Charlene Anderson, AICP (253) 856-5431
Planning Manager
City of Kent Community Development Dept.
220 Fourth Ave South
Kent, Wjk 98032
Date; 1n/14/ R _ .. Signature Illugt A" - kwci 411-iwwoA
S:\Permit\Plan\Env\2008\CXPadopt2009-2014 doc