The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3903ORDINANCE NO. -3 0-3 AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the Kent Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities Element to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts (CPA -2008- 4). RECITALS A. The State of Washington Growth Management Act ("GMA") requires internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements and the plans from other jurisdictions. B. To assure that comprehensive plans remain relevant and up to date, the GMA allows amendments to the capital facilities element of comprehensive plans concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a city budget (RCW 36.70A.130(2)(a)(iii)). C. The City of Kent has established procedures for amending the Comprehensive Plan in Chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code, allowing amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the City budget and allowing the City Council to hold the public hearing instead of the Land Use and Planning Board. 1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2008 School Dist. Capital Facilities Plans D. The Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts have submitted proposed amendments to their Capital Facilities Plans to be included in an amendment of the City's Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. E. After providing appropriate public notice, the City Council of the City of Kent considered the requested Comprehensive Plan amendment and conducted a public hearing on the same on October 21, 2008. F. On September 16, 2008, the City provided the required sixty (60) day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 to the State of Washington of the City's proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan and the sixty (60) day notice period has lapsed. G. On December 9, 2008, the City Council for the City of Kent approved the Capital Facilities Element amendment CPA -2008-4 to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached and incorporated by this reference. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE SECTION 1. - Amendment. The Kent Comprehensive Plan, and its Capital Facilities Element, are hereby amended to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached and incorporated by this reference (CPA -2008-4). SECTION 2. - Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2008 School Dist. Capital Facilities Plans SECTION 3. - Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after the date of passage as provided by law. ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITOLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: T M BRUB KER, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED: % day of December, 2008. APPROVED: 9 day of December, 2008. PUBLISHED: 13 day of December, 2008. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. 3po3 passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. -_DA JA{SEAL) BRENCOB , CITY CLERK P %Civll\Ordinance\Ccs.pptanAmend; SchW61019ttaNalFacilitie Plans -2008 doc 3 Comprehensive Plan Amendme 2008 School Dist. Capital Facilities Pla EXHIBIT A 2006 — 2009 — 2013 — 2014 Emerald Park Elementary Site Emerald Park Elementary School Emerald Park Elementary Serving Unincorporated King County Residents find Residents of the Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, Renton Mack Diamond, Mapfe va(fey, and Sea7ac, Washington Apri[2008 SIX - YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 - 2009 -- 2013 - 2014 46 IA KIS NT n.:1100L BOARD of DIRECTORS Jim Berrios Bill Boyce Sandra Collins Chris Davies Debbie Straus ADMINISTRATION Barbara Grohe, Ph.D. — Superintendent Fred H High — Assistant Superintendent for Business Services Mark Haddock, Ph.D. — Assistant Superintendent, Learning & School Improvement Larry Miner — Assistant Superintendent for Human Resources John Knutson — Executive Director of Finance Mern Rieger — Executive Director, School Improvement 9 — 12 Janis Bechtel — Executive Director, School Improvement K — 8 Jeanette Ristau — Executive Director, School Improvement K — 6 Becky Hanks — Executive Director, Community Connections Charles Lind — Executive Director, Labor Relations & Legal Services Laura Madeo — Executive Director of Instructionai Services Greg Whiteman -- Executive Director of Information Technology Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilites Pian April 2008 0& M1 KENT' SIX - YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 - 2009 — 2013 - 2014 April 2008 For information on the Plan, please call the Finance & Planning Department at (253) 373-7295 Capital Facilities Plan Contributing Staff Gwenn Escher-Derdowski Forecast & Planning Administrator Fred Long, Supervisor of Facilities Construction Karla Wilkerson & Lynell Mooney, Facilities Department Don Walkup, Supervisor of Transportation Department Kathy Fostord, Transportation Department Cover Design by Debbi Smith Maps by Jana Tucker Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Six -Tear Capita[ Facilities Plan Tad fe of Contents Section Page Number I Executive Summary 2 11 Six -Year Enrollment Projection & History 4 III District Standard of Service 9 I V Inventory, Capacity & Maps of Existing Schools 12 V Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan 15 V I Relocatable Classrooms 18 V I I Projected Classroom Capacity 19 V I I I Finance Plan, Cost Basis and Impact Fee Schedules 24 I X Summary of Changes to Previous Plan 31 X Appendixes 32 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Executive Summary This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Kent School District (the "District") as the organization's facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K C C 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, Renton, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual pian update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2008 for the 2007-2008 school year This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's needs The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends In the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and Renton and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. The first ordinance implementing impact fees for the unincorporated areas was effective September 15, 1993. In order for Impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee -Implementing ordinance for the District. For Impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and Renton must also adopt this Plan and their own school Impact fee ordinances. This Plan has also been submitted to cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current and future capacity While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for local program needs in the District The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Program capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Relocatables in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (continued) Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Pian April 2008 Page 2 Executive Summary The capacity of each school in the standard of service and the existing classrooms. The District's program program changes and the reduction Student Achievement Initiative 728. capacity until permanent facilities are (continued) District is calculated based on the District inventory, which includes some relocatable capacity of permanent facilities reflects of class size to meet the requirements of Relocatables provide additional transitional completed. Kent School District is the fourth largest district in the state. Enrollment is electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) on Form P-223 Although funding apportionment is based on Annual Average Full Time Equivalent (AAFTE), Enrollment on October i is a widely recognized "snapshot in time" that is used to report the District's enrollment for the year. P-223 Headcount for October 1, 2007 was 26,862 P-223 FTE (Full Time Equivalent) enrollment was 25,745 42 (FTE reports Kindergarten at .5 and excludes Early Childhood Education [ECE] and college -only Running Start students.) The actual number of individual students per the October 2007 full head count was 27,584. (Full Headcount reports all enrolled students at 1 0 including Kindergarten, ECE and college -only Running Start students.) The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of transitional facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of relocatables. A financing plan is included in Section V I I I which demonstrates the District's ability to implement this Plan. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated annually with changes in the fee schedules adjusted accordingly Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 3 I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years. (See Table 2) The student generation factor, as defined on the next page, is the basis for the growth projections from new developments. King County births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system (See Table 1) 8 29% of 22,431 King County live births in 2003 is projected for 1,860 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2008 Together with proportional growth from new construction, 829% of King County births is equivalent to the number of students projected to enter kindergarten In the district for the next six-year period (see Table 2) State Funded Full Day Kindergarten ("FDK") programs have required a revision to the methodology for projecting Kindergarten at 1.0 FTE for qualifying schools. Schools with half-day Kindergarten programs and the optional Tuition -based F D K are projected at 50 FTE. (see Table 2A) Early Childhood Education students (sometimes identified as "Preschool Special Education [SE] or handicapped students") are forecast and reported separately Capacity is reserved to serve the ECE programs at seven elementary schools. The first grade population is traditionally 7 - 8% larger than the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District from private kindergartens. Cohort survival method uses historical enrollment data to forecast the number of students projected for the following year Near term projections assume some growth from new developments to be offset by current local economic conditions With notable exceptions, the expectation is that enrollment increases will occur District -wide in the long term. District protections are based on historical growth patterns combined with continuing development of projects in the pipeline dependent on market/growth conditions The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools and monitor conditions to reflect adjustments in this assumption The six-year enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions may be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The Kent School District serves seven permitting jurisdictions unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, and Auburn and small portions of the cities of Renton, SeaTac, and Maple Valley The west Lake Sawyer area of Kent School District is in the city of Black Diamond. (Continued) Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Apnl 2008 Page 4 I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection (Continued) STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on distnct records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last five years. Following these guidelines, the student generation factor for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary .445 Middle School .118 Senior High .245 Total .808 Multi -Family Elementary 296 Middle School 075 Senior High 111 Total 482 The student generation factor is based on a survey of 1,878 single family dwelling units and 1,283 multi -family dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy rates. Please refer to Appendix E on Page 36 of the Capital Facilities Plan for details of the Student Generation Factor survey. The actual number of students in those residential developments was determined using the District's Education Logistics (EDULOG) Transportation System. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 5 N�N � ff. 500 F C-0 F J z C � Lo J m p Zc Z W m Z W uj F c Y UL m CL J w m W Co 0 m v m 0 m J 0 m m N 7; In J m ' a D eea 7 o m O o O 0 = � m cu S •^4z' VJ m 0 r C', w r O co -1N Y 0 0 O co C7 O O ' C7 CD (D C7 U' m mN N N N N (n NN N 007 V' N 01 0 � m O N N E O_ O CQ ti N � ^_ On N O m O 1fi O O O 1A v N N N N N N N N 00 Lnr o 0 N O �t O M ti M m to T O O O N N ti N N N O NN N N NN N co p 07 Cl r N m CO t!) a t- tD CD O a0 O a0 f` M, N U) O T N O� � CD m m O O r N m N N 00r r N N N N N N N N r ('7 L \° Lo to N N l0 O m t- to CD m V u7 tD r- n (O O O 47 Cl O 0 tD Q N O co m O O O N N M M N t" t^ NN N r r N N N N N N c N o M N Grpp y M N ti O0 o? M a? o co o 7 to ccoo m I-- o O d o to N 00 •- r N N rV N N N N N r r a (D ti O (D m M N -�r rD 0 O C) O O O 0 Or Lo r U'P N8 �V Cl) V N m N O N N � N N N N N N N N N r r C r ° foo Cl) [T. o (Dto 0) in a M o ti m N O O O O O N O Cl O O o N m N W N N N N r~ N m N N to N N N Lo r N h O a N CO O _ N O O O O co � N to 0) r r O r N N N N N N N N N r r CO V) p Q in Go Lo co N co O Irl M m N Cl) N tD Q� O O rD N OD cco ` j (T O O N O 0 O 0 O m m m n m 0 (D (D r N co N N N N N N N r r r r r Lo co V M (D N co tl h N N COGo LO (D NM O M M n m O M m O c O O O t7) m a) C r- (J9 N N N N N N CO N c N m « (D 00 m n M Q ^ N (D 0 N N m N O (D CD m O m m m c0 mCi co 0 Lo W Y r N to N r N r r r r r r r Lf) $ o Ln r m t in Ln Lo to O CM mQui _N Lo N O m O m 00 C) 0) 0 r- to r N co M N M 1- N NV M r N1 r IT r r O por r N r LD ti ((DD ONO T (0D CD N N -,t m m m m co m C) 0 00 to i[) M r N ' co a0 O ti t N M O M - 03 m N 0 O O to m m In m m rI h CO to 'OV M Tl- (7q N N r r r r r r r r r r N \ m OO O O r N N a m Cl) O) O cr)O O O ` Om). Ci CC m 000. 0 rl (D tD V N tT r r r r r r — r .- r r r C) e V f.0 M N N O M � tT al (0 (0 co m D? 00 (Ti OO t` coN (D V N r r r r r r O L N O � O rl m O N N Q co cc O 0) Ql co 00 m S h r tD (D u'; N T r co r r r r r r — r r r E W LU o m ' a D N Q L m In r0 h 0 = � m cu S •^4z' VJ m 0 r C', w r x 1 Y 0 0 C7 U C7 U C7 0 C7 CD 0 C7 U' N ti N 00 Lr i N O Lo N O s` in N 0 Lo M LoN Lo M N M in N N in N O O O Lo N W N O O LQ N N co N co M M N T N N Cl) 00 N N N N N N N N M N to M 0 N �C E c W �a O F O) r• N i O O N M E m O a F N C a M rn m N N ro ro c D a a a LO � � c O j CD O N C to m r N m to N O C r c Y m ur 8 L U U 10 N coID v Em v O r_ E o r 2 m a 0 (NV �L. n c� Ln F Y 9 9 C, m 0. m O N Q KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX -YEAR F.T.E. ENROLLMENT PROJECTION State Funded FDK at 14 schools LB in 2002 _B in 2oc3 LB n 2004 LB in 2005 Lia in 2006 LB in 2007 LB in 2008 7- r L) A f P R 0 J E C T k C} 14 Octoberl 2007 1 2008 1 2009 1 2010 2011 2012 2013 King County Live Births' 21,863 22,431 22,874 22,680 24,244 24,250 24,300 1 Increase / Decrease 85 568 443 -194 1,564 6 50 Kindergarten I Birth % 2 829% 829% 829% 829% 829% 829% 829% 2'3 Kindergarten FTE @ .5 906 475 473 465 530 532 532 212 FD Kindergarten @ 1 0 25,745 910 950 950 950 950 950 Grade 1 1,873 1,905 2,046 2,041 2,025 2,161 2,165 Grade 2 2,045 1,893 1,946 2,089 2,083 2,067 2,205 Grade 3 2,033 2,096 1,951 2,005 2,151 2,145 2,128 Grade 4 2,049 2,051 2,133 1,987 2,041 2,188 2,182 Grade 5 2,020 2,051 2,085 2,168 2,021 2,075 2,223 Grade 6 2,098 2,094 2,124 2,159 2,244 2,094 2,149 Grade 7 2,130 2,133 2,135 2,165 2,201 2,286 2,135 Grade 8 2,184 2,088 2,115 2,117 2,146 2,181 2,265 Grade 9 2,560 2,518 2,407 2,437 2,440 2,473 2,513 Grade 10 2,474 2,311 2,299 2,198 2,225 2,22B 2,258 Grade 11 1,882 2,071 2,044 2,034 1,945 1,969 1,972 Grade 12 1,491 1,468 1,772 1,749 1,741 1,665 1,686 Total FTE Enrollment 25,745 26,064 26,480 26,564 26,743 27,014 27,363 Note 2!314 Yearly Increase -119 319 416 84 179 271 349 Yearly Increase/Decrease % -046% 124% 1 60% 032% 0.67% 1 01% 129% Cumulative Increase -119 200 616 700 879 1,150 1,499 Full Time Equivalent (FTE) 25,745 1 26,064 1 25,480 1 26,564 1 26,743 27,014 1 27,363 1 Kinderga�ten enrollment protection is based on KSD percentage of live births in King County five years previous 2 Kindergarten FTE protection is calculated by using the District's previous year percentage of King County births 5 years earlier compared to actual kindergarten enrollment in the previous year (Excludes ECE - Early Childhood Education) 3 Kindergarten protection is at 1 0 FTE for 14 scncols qua ifying for 1-728 & State Apportionment Funded Full Day Kindergarten (FDK) Schools with Optional Tuition -based Full Day Kindergarten programs & 1/2 Day Kindergarten are protected at 5 FTE 4 Oct 2007 P223 FTE is 25,745 & Headcount is 26,862 Full student count with ECE Preschool & Running Start = 27,584 G R O W T H P R O J E C T I O N S - Adjustments for current economic factors For facilities planning purposes, this six-year enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new development currently In some phase of planning or construction In the district Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 April 2008 Page 7 co O O N W Z 0 U W 7 �a Z ZLU U_ Q H � to � O _Z O Y O S N U J V) O Z 2 Y fA Q H z w 2 W J LU O a CL Q V U U OU U w W LL 0 0 0= n Y J 2� 2 2 z d a d af m w 0 N m C m x U. Ln a oo m W 7 rn N m0 U O m N O y d G N cD O Q j N y C N C y O C c m m G C m O Y LA b C N L d Y � � N c m 3 0 � c m c � C c Y c o m � a m b C O Y " G > C C C > C ro r O as c r N R L a � C Q a1 ? > V —�� t Y aci T m a � Y Q to 3 o d Y � � Y z C LL c o � Y n E c, > m @ r a x o Y ti t LL N M o a LJ uY LL � Lac g Y m c m m o a, c o m g m S W C U m m m G C LL U m C m m C O LL Q W m c � � L 4 U m m > QI y (➢ r � J y C U O Q Y L O EI C U a N M m m m O O O Z Z Z C>00 E �_ N U R N N mm (C Ln O OY L l7 Q 7 m 0 (D O O Ln (D N m L7 Ln O �{ Y 7 C N f` fD Q co O0 N Cr c N04 t h m to m to m a Lf, a v m m r Ln a Ln O O LV O O N V Ln Ln Ln 7 M Ln N a U N M O m m m to M � 9` N Cl) M M h U> 0 N N M X- Lu U W>- co W N M NN Q U U U U r M N N Y M � cc w a n � X U m W E m m Z c c m �, E Z �a m m m Q 2 m E c c m w m W e c a, c m o C,, m E E E m m y _v c E m m _� c y m w 1- aci E E 10 O _m y W m E E E m Y W W m E m W W m y Lu -m Z' m W W Y v O C m W UJ w m w OL L m W m Y w S W W Y. m p W W a F O1 m r" OU S LL i, y O W m m j m 2 m Sz tl J O y c m D V7 w> bo C a c t O F m a`, U m m U V ff N U C O y o d C c C X L N C m C m O C Lu Q C Y fy0 Ocz co m m o W W LL o 0 o 2 z a v (D o o to o m o Ln (D m N Co � m V �.. t N r m T C W m C C W Q Y N cl N M LL m 0 LL y m N Ln N Q 1L O N Y v N O H N W w tLU 9 m 3 O m m LA CO cD to N ti to Cl) co 0 0 Ln O W C O Q O T N N M M N N M M N M N LL m O = D O � N d W y � O L T m LL Um O 7 e 0 M O m �- L m N N N IG N LL a Y LLLU m W O O O O O N LL ~ r LLL O X a Lu y U m C CV Y N O 1�. m o r, 4 a0 w O Ln IV n O Ln o O LL LL r LL O c 13 m WN C W O co m O —O LL C LL p co a r LL o CL r C m x U. Ln a oo m W 7 rn N m0 U O m N O y d G N cD O Q j N y C N C y O C c m m G C m O Y LA b C N L d Y � � N c m 3 0 � c m c � C c Y c o m � a m b C O Y " G > C C C > C ro r O as c r N R L a � C Q a1 ? > V —�� t Y aci T m a � Y Q to 3 o d Y � � Y z C LL c o � Y n E c, > m @ r a x o Y ti t LL N M o a LJ uY LL � Lac g Y m c m m o a, c o m g m S W C U m m m G C LL U m C m m C O LL Q W m c � � L 4 U m m > QI y (➢ r � J y C U O Q Y L O EI C U a N M m m m O O O Z Z Z C>00 E �_ N U R N N mm (C Ln O OY L l7 Q 7 m 0 (D O O Ln (D N m L7 Ln O �{ Y 7 C N f` fD Q co O0 N Cr c N04 t h m O co O O S O m a a< a Lf, a v v a LA m r Ln a Ln C M LV O O N V Ln Ln Ln 7 M Ln N a U m U> 0 2 a� w X- Lu U W>- co W W J x U m of Q U U U U w w LL o C7 C7 x Y z a a a s ( w o m w n � m Lm' C E m m Z c c m �, E Z �a m m m Q 2 m E c c m w m W e c a, c m o C,, m E E E m m y _v c E m m _� c y m w 1- aci E E 10 O _m y W m E E E m Y W W m E m W W m y Lu -m Z' m W W Y v O C m W UJ w m w OL L m W m Y w S W W Y. m p W W a F m m j CG co 00 3= i, y O W m m j m 2 m Sz tl J O y c m D V7 w> bo C a c t O F m a`, U m m U V ff N U C O y o d C c C X L N C m C m O C Lu fy0 co m O C 0 CL U U U U W W LL o (7 U' x Y u i 2 z a a a cn co U) 0 W C m x U. Ln a oo m W 7 rn N m0 U O m N O y d G N cD O Q j N y C N C y O C c m m G C m O Y LA b C N L d Y � � N c m 3 0 � c m c � C c Y c o m � a m b C O Y " G > C C C > C ro r O as c r N R L a � C Q a1 ? > V —�� t Y aci T m a � Y Q to 3 o d Y � � Y z C LL c o � Y n E c, > m @ r a x o Y ti t LL N M o a LJ uY LL � Lac g Y m c m m o a, c o m g m S W C U m m m G C LL U m C m m C O LL Q W m c � � L 4 U m m > QI y (➢ r � J y C U O Q Y L O EI C U a N M m m m O O O Z Z Z III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County Code 21A.06 references a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the district which would best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as "impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower class size at those facilities. Relocatables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (see Appendix A, e & C) The standard of service defined herein may continue to change in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service adjustments to meet the requirements of Student Achievement Initiative 728 This process will affect various aspects of the District's "standard of service" and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans Because the funding for Initiative 728 is incremental, implementation of the Initiative is also incremental and may result in changes to school capacity. Current Standards of Service for Elements Students Class size for Kindergarten should not exceed an average of 22 students. Class size for grades 1 - 4 should not exceed an average of 23 students. Class size for grades 5 - 6 should not exceed an average of 29 students. Program capacity for general education elementary classrooms is calculated at an average of 24 students per classroom because of fluctuations between primary and intermediate grade levels (i.e. third/fourth or fourth/fifth grade split classes, etc.) Most elementary schools provide full day kindergarten programs (FDK or KAI — Full Day Kindergarten or Kindergarten Academic Intervention) with the second half of the day funded by grants or tuition. Students have scheduled time in a computer lab. Students may also be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (continued) Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 9 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs such as those designated as follows: English Language Learners (E L L) Self-contained Special Education Support Center Programs (SC) Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Early Childhood Education (ECE) (3-4 yr old students with disabilities) School Adjustment (SA) Program for severely behavior -disordered students Speech & Language Therapy & Programs for Hearing impaired students Adaptive Support Center for Mild, Moderate & Severe Disabilities (ASC -DD) Occupational & Physical Therapy Programs (OT/PT) Developmental Kindergarten in SC Programs Kindergarten Academic intervention Program (KAl-Full Day Kindergarten) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) — Federal Program Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) — State Program District Remediation Programs Education for Highly Capable Students (formerly "Gifted" Program) Some of the above special programs require specialized classroom space, as well as music and physical education classrooms, computer labs, etc., thus, the permanent capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in these special programs and "pull-out" space must be allocated to serve these programs. Some newer buildings have been constructed to accommodate most of these programs; some older buildings have been modified, and in some circumstances, these modifications reduce the classroom capacity of the buildings. When programs change, program capacity is updated to reflect the change in program and capacity. Current Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings Reductions have been made in 7th and 10th grade English classes for Initiative 728 These standards are subject to change pending annual updates based on staff and public review for changes funded by Student Achievement Initiative 728. Class size for grades 7 - 8 should not exceed an average of 29 students Class size for 7th & 10th grade English class should not exceed an average of 25 students. Class size for grades 9 - 12 should not exceed an average of 31 students. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (cont'd Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 10 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) Identified secondary students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows. Computer, Multi -media & Technology Labs & Programs — (Nova Net - Advanced Academics) Technology Academy programs at Kent -Meridian High School & Mill Creek Middle School Science Programs & Labs — Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Oceanography, Astronomy, Meteorology, Marine Biology, General Science, etc. English Language Learners (E L L) Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Basic Skills Programs Transition Outreach Program (TOP) for 18-21 year old Special Education students Child Development Preschool and Daycare Programs Music Programs — Band, Orchestra, Chorus, Jazz Band, etc. Art Programs — Painting, Design, Drawing, Ceramics, Pottery, Photography, etc. Theater Arts — Drama, Stage Tech, etc Journalism and Yearbook Classes Highly Capable (Honors or Gifted) and Advanced Placement Programs International Baccalaureate Program Kent Phoenix Academy — Performance Learning Center, Gateway, Virtual High School & Kent Success program with evening classes designed for credit retrieval Traffic Safety Education JROTC - Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps Variety of Career & Technical Education Programs (CTE -Vocational Education) Family & Consumer Science — Culinary Arts, Sewing, Careers w/Children/Educ , etc. Health & Human Services — Sports Medicine, Sign Language, Cosmetology, etc Business Education — Word Processing, Accounting, Business Law & Math, DECA, FBLA (Future Business Leaders), Sales & Marketing, Economics, Web Design Technical & Industry — Woodworking, Cabinet Making, Building Trades, Metals, Automotive & Manufacturing Technology, Welding, Machine Shop, Drafting, Drawing, CAD (Computer-aided Design), Electronics, Engineering & Design, Aviation, etc Graphic & Commercial Arts, Media, Photography, Theater & Stage, Ag & Horticulture Many of these programs and others require specialized classroom space which can reduce the permanent capacity of the school buildings. In addition, alternative home school assistance, choice and transition programs are provided for students in grades 2 - 12 at Kent Mountain View Academy Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 85% for secondary schools Program capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level with adjustments for pull-out programs served in relocatables. In the future, the District will continue close analysis of actual utilization. Kent School Distnct Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 11 I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 27,150 students and transitional (relocatable) capacity to house 1,470 This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section I I I Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity. (See Table 3 on Page 93) The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs, additional classrooms and new schools Program capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes and new capacity for building additions at the high schools. Program capacity also reflects adjustments for the Student Achievement Initiative 728 reduction in class size The class size reduction received voter approval in the Educational Programs and Operations Levy as well as through funding for Student Achievement Initiative 728 The District will conduct annual public review and update class size recommendations in accordance with the requirements and incremental funding of Student Achievement Initiative 728 Kent Mountain View Academy (formerly Kent Learning Center and Grandview Elementary) serves Grades 2 — 12 with transition, choice and home school assistance programs It is located in the former Grandview School in the western part of the District in the city of SeaTac. This school was originally designed as an elementary school and is included in the elementary capacity for this Plan. Kent Phoenix Academy is a new non-traditional high school which opened in Fall 2007 in the renovated site and building that formerly served Sequoia Middle School. KPA has four special programs including the Performance Learning Center, Gateway, Virtual High School and Kent Success Kent Success replaced the former Night Academy at Kent -Meridian High School and provides afternoon and evening classes for credit retrieval Calculation of Elementary, Middle School and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B and C A map of existing schools is included on Page 14. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 12 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS ' Changes to capacity reflect program changes and new building additions at high schools P Mill Creek Middle School and Technology Academy replaced renovated Kent Junior High in 2005 3 Kent Mountain View Academy serves grades 2-12 The school was formerly known as Kent Learning Center d Grandview Elementary 4 Kent Phoenix Academy is a new non-traditional high school which opened in Fall 2007 in the former Sequoia MS building Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 April 2008 Page 13 2007-2008 Year SCHOOL Opened ABR ADDRESS Program Capacity' Carnage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235 -140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 452 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timbederie Way SE, Covington 98042 402 Covington Elementary 1961 CO 17070 SE Wax Road, Covington 98042 498 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225 -180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 456 East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 464 Emerald Park 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 504 Fainvood Elementary 1969 FW 16600 -148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 408 George T Daniel Elementary 992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 450 Glenndge Elementary 1996 GR 19405 - 120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 456 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700. 191st Place SE, Kent 98042 452 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641 - 144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 504 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915 -186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 398 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700 - 64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 464 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660 -142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 524 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 474 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710 - 108th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 464 Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621 - 140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 524 Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 119119 SE 270th Street, Kent 98030 498 Neely -O'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 440 Panther Lake Elementary 1938 PL 20831 - 108th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 396 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 480 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27625 - 118th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 522 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030 -162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 504 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135 -228th Ave SE, Black Diamond 98010 504 Scenic Hill Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030 464 Soos Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 408 Spnngbrook Elementary 1969 SB 20035 -100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 398 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300 - 132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 504 Elementary TOTAL 13,012 Cedar Heights Middle School 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 Street, Covington 98042 923 Mattson Middle School 1981 MA 16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042 804 Meeker Middle School 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 890 Mendian Middle School 1958 MJ 23480 - 120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 790 Mill Creek MS (former Kent Jr Hi) 2 200511952 MC 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 828 Northwood Middle School 1996 NW 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 972 Middle School TOTAL 5,207 Kent-Mendian Senior High School 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98030 1,772 Kentlake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042 1,986 Kentndge Senior High School 1968 KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 2,270 Kentwood Senior High School 1981 KW 25800 - 164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 2,137 Senior High TOTAL 8,165 Kent Mountain View Academy 3 1965 LC 22420 Military Road, Des Moines 98198 416 Kent Phoenix Academy 4 1966 PH 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98030 350 DISTRICT TOTAL 27,150 ' Changes to capacity reflect program changes and new building additions at high schools P Mill Creek Middle School and Technology Academy replaced renovated Kent Junior High in 2005 3 Kent Mountain View Academy serves grades 2-12 The school was formerly known as Kent Learning Center d Grandview Elementary 4 Kent Phoenix Academy is a new non-traditional high school which opened in Fall 2007 in the former Sequoia MS building Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 April 2008 Page 13 0 �E• uW IS9AV41091 a• Ln �o t m mN m� U • MC 0 cy m • om Toys • Y Uw 0 Yz d >Z m a n 3S any z m � 7 oy m=E y O J YW O N Q L • N c Cm a c N w Ym ma �� m m Ln �o t m mN C71hE cE • o 0 3S 0 cy m • Toys • mZ. ,� my Yz ao >Z m a • o0 v2 06 gym• m mE W Vo • ym• �w 41im1 Cm 17.0.0 N • UO or V m ~ m E Y �� 'o E c cy O O m0 N Ya �c Nn mt 2 W U W • tD LU 0,0 (n • - •EU Ym ma �� m m o mL C71hE cE • o 0 3S 0 cy m • _W7 • mZ. ,� my •�a Yz ao Um D`o �� oz v2 m_m NW Om In* mL T m ym• 41im1 AV PUZE 1 W WW o mZ ° Yx m Ya �c as am Ca cv m`c 3S any 441+91 w m m X a• O C71hE cE cm ay 0 7Q �ti• m �w • a vm oz •0 30 c In* mL T m (V om AV PUZE 1 W Ct t/1 W mZ ° Yx Ya �c h am Ca cv m`c .o c 0 •EU aE W ) 7 'CO V • l) m O � nw Q yD w 2.2 Mm• - r QI m X a• O C71hE cE cm a wm�u 0 7Q �ti• m �w vm L m • a In* w 0 N (V G E AV PUZE 1 W M IS any PUZ£ l • ° ° a a ccm am Ca cv m`c •EU mE Cv0ium 0, oE•`�ui •aw nw Q yD • •xu �• 2.2 Mm• - r QI m X a• O C71hE cE cm a wm�u uay"' aW m �w fpr 4SaM • c • c Z' 6 m o O >T >m m aE mm , m zW 5 ■IIS eAV 441701 ; 0 a 0 •2' m u U rn mE x u� to W eny 1DA4ueO N 3 N O E N �O Q E T N 0 v)O > U U O C Q Cn O CO C X p�_C)� 00 w � � Q) Y co `a 11:�r N Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Pian April 2008 Page 14 V Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan At the time of preparation of this Plan in spnng of 2008, the following projects are completed or In the planning phase in the District • Construction is in progress for additional classroom capacity at Kent -Meridian and Kentlake High Schools • Sequoia Middle School was renovated and reconfigured to provide capacity for approximately 350 high school students at the new non-traditional high school, Kent Phoenix Academy in 2007-08 • Kent Junior High was renovated and renamed and opened in September 2005 as Mill Creek Middle School Mill Creels also serves the 7-8 Kent Technology Academy program Construction of Phase I I of the renovation of Mill Creek MS is in progress • In February 2006, voters approved construction funding for replacement of Panther Lake Elementary School and a future Elementary School to accommodate new growth • Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary and high school level Future facility and site needs are reflected in this Pian • A new site was acquired for replacement of Panther Lake Elementary Sites for potential future schools and facilities are listed in Table 4 and shown on the site map on page 17 • Some funding is secured for purchase of additional portables and some funding may be provided by impact fees as needed Sites are based on need for additional capacity As a critical component of capital facilities planning, county and city planners and decision -makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety as well as bus pull-outs and turn-arounds for school buses. Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future (See Table 4) Voter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is secured for purchase of additional sites but some may be funded with impact fees as needed Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs 2006 voter approval of $106M bond issue for capital improvement included the construction funding for a new elementary school, replacement of Panther Lake Elementary, and classroom additions to high schools Some impact fees will also be applied to those projects Student Achievement Initiative 728 funds are being utilized to reduce class size and provide extended learning opportunities Based on community input at public hearings, the Board will continue annual review of standard of service and those decisions will be reflected in the each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 15 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity SCHOOL / FACILITY ! SITE # on Map ELEMENTARY 13 Replacement for Panther Lake Elementary (F) PL Elementary Site (F) Panther Lake Elementary - Replaced in 2009 Elementary # 31 (F) Site for Elementary # 31 (Unfunded)' Protected Protected % for LOCATION Type_ I Status Completion Program new Date I Capacity I Growth (Numbers assigned to future schools may not correlate with number of existing schools; SE 216th Street & 102nd Ave SE Replacement Design 2009 500 21% SE 216th Street & 102nd Ave SE Site Planning 2008 21% SE 208 Street & 108tn Ave SE Replacement Planning 2009 -396 NIA To be determined 2 New Planning 2011-12 500 100% To be determined 2 Site Planning 2011-12 100% MIDDLE SCHOOL Mill Creek Middle School 620 N Central Avenue, Kent Renovation Construcflm 2008 828 WA Phase II of Renovation Sequoia Middle School Renovation & Reconfiguration Renovation Planning 2007 • 771 NIA Elementary for Kent Phoenix Academy 5 Covington area West (Halleson-Wikstrom) SE 256 & 154 SE, Covington 98042 Elementary City of Covington SENIOR HIGH 16820 SE 240, Kent 98042 Elementary King County 8 SE of Lake Morton area (West property) SE 332 & 204 SE, Kent 98042 New Non-traditional High School Former Sequoia Middle School 2 Shady Lk area (Sowers, Blaine, Drahota, Paroline) 17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98058 Elementary King County Kent Phoenix Academy (Funded) 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent Renovation Utilized 2007.08 350 100% Classroom add!tsons at Kentlake High School (F) 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent Additions Constructwn 2008 171 10090 Classroom additions at Kent-Mendian HS (F) 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent Additions Planning 2009 79 100% TEMPORARY FACILITIES Relocatabies For placement as needed SUPPORT FACILITIES Bus Facility (Unfunded)' Near Kent-Mendian High School # on Man s OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Additional Capacity New Planning 2008+ 24-2i eacn 100% Iff-M Planning TBD' N ! A Land Use Type Jurisdiction 4 Covington area North (Near Mattson MS) SE 251 & 164 SE, Covington 98042 Elementary City of Covington 7 Covington area South (Scarselia) SE 290 & 156 SE, Kent 98042 Elementary King County 5 Covington area West (Halleson-Wikstrom) SE 256 & 154 SE, Covington 98042 Elementary City of Covington 3 Ham take area (Pollard) 16820 SE 240, Kent 98042 Elementary King County 8 SE of Lake Morton area (West property) SE 332 & 204 SE, Kent 98042 Secondary King County 2 Shady Lk area (Sowers, Blaine, Drahota, Paroline) 17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98058 Elementary King County 1 So King Co Activity Center (Nike site) SE 167 & 170 SE, Renton 98058 TBD s King County 12 South Central site (Plemmons-Yeh-Wms) SE 286th Street & 124th Ave SE, Kent TBD King County N otes: ' Unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future 7 TBD - To be determined - Some sites are acquired but placement, timing and/or configuration have not been determined 3 Numbers correspond to sites on Map on Page 17 Other site locations are parcels identified in Table 7 on Page 27 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 April 2008 Page 16 LLD r- d' o y Z o m T Y3 ora C) Cr o � C 3� a m Y N N C •75 mC + N W O C //L'� —` 2 LO m 0 CL /i_ w CL �L -0 w A 2 //�� "poa 0 c° mZ o o C 0 1, 0=3 T y j 0 ,moi M • v f'� � m • I C C- mw Y Cmc00 v 0¢Coa CL � a o any 41791F(DEC O3S (4� E Cc 3S eAV 440P L � • o �w om Go �g N S. 3S eny ouLE l c -pp Z E 0 3S aAy PUZ£ l w •i 1 • c 23 c `M 0 c� C O om C c mE m ma) _ C-1 z n° YE m gzow 2ro •a �v0,w •cm _ �� m �o cm c m = a o 0 0 �U • c� aw o mE caw Vim• E of ua i� a C cT o f 3y CE m a y Em wW U• E v mac •a m _m mW 3S eAy 41801 � Z m'- c ym Qw N W N CE �w CU m¢ Y $° o vm nE =z cmo 3S9Ay41701 v CW -m O pCa C Y` U • nI�% N� Cc wE 2� N WoE a0 uy 0m h m° r �w 0 • y �0 c� !70 any J0J$Ua0 C P S'@ ti AomgbH AaIIDA 15eM • c • � Z. m�. iv0 N m`b YC L N m m J 3 j m E W Zw cT 8m a Keot- Y0�¢ • S a{b{SfglU� Kent School District Six -Year Capftal Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 17 V I Relocatable Classrooms For the purpose of clarification, the term "portables" and the more descriptively accurate term, "relocatables" are used interchangeably in this Plan The Plan also references use of portables or relocatables as Interim or transitional capacity/facilities Currently, the District utilizes 131 relocatables to house students in excess of permanent capacity, for program purposes at school locations, and six for other p rposes. (See Appendices A B C D) Based on enrollment projections, program capacity and funded permanent facilities, the District anticipates the need to purchase some additional relocatables during the next six-year period The continually escalating cost of moving relocatables will increasingly limit the choice between building new relocatables on site and relocating older ones. During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District's relocatables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the relocatables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these relocatables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community Portables, or relocatables, may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Relocatables currently in use will be evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced Quality concerns will be among those addressed by the next Community Facilities Planning Committee for review of capital facilities needs for the next bond issue The Plan projects that the District will use relocatables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond The use of relocatables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between relocatables, emerging technologies and educational restructuring will continue to be examined. Kent School Distnct Six -Year Capital Faciiibes Pian April 2008 Page 18 VII Projected Six -Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section I V, the program capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size fluctuations in Grades K - 4. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3 on Page 13, the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts (See Tables 5 & 5 A -B -C on pages 20 - 23) Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE) The first school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment "snapshot in time" to report enrollment for the year. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) student enrollment for October 2007 was 25,745.42. Kindergarten students are reported at .5 although many schools provide full day kindergarten ("FDK") with alternative funding for the second half of the day. Future State -funded Full Day Kindergarten programs will report and project some Kindergarten students at 1 00 FTE at qualifying FDK schools. P-223 FTE excludes Early Childhood Education (preschool) students and College -only Running Start students. (See Tables 5 & 5A -B -C on pages 20 - 23) In October there were 645 students in 11th and 12th grade participating in the Running Start program at 10-20 different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. 355 of these students attended classes only at the college ("college -only") and are excluded from FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District continues to be the fourth largest district in the state of Washington P-223 Headcount for October 2007 was 26,862 with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECE and college -only Running Start students A full headcount of all students enrolled in October 2007 totals 27,584 which includes ECE and college -only Running Start students. Based on the enrollment forecasts, current inventory and capacity, current standard of service, relocatable capacity, and future planned additional classroom space, the District anticipates having sufficient capacity to house students over the next six years See Table 5 and Tables 5 A -B -C on Pages 20 - 23) This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There may be significant need for additional portables and/or new schools to accommodate growth within the District and class size reduction mandated under Student Achievement Initiative 728 Some schools, by design, may be opened with relocatables on site. Boundary changes, limited movement of relocatables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a mayor role in addressing overcrowding and underutilization of facilities in different parts of the District Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 19 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT SCHOOL YEAR 2007-2008 2008-2009 1 2009-2010 1 2010-2011 1 2011-2012 1 2012-2013 1 2013-2014 Actual P R O J E C T E D Permanent Program Capaclty ' 26,743 27,150 27,321 27,504 27,504 28,004 28,004 Changes to Permanent Capaclty ' 4 Sequoia Middle School renovated & reconfigured as Kent Phoenix Academy High School W4 Change to Middle School Capacity -771 4 Kent Phoenix Academy High Scnool replaced Sequoia Midele School 4 High School Program Capacity added 350 5 Mill Creek MS Renovation - Phase 2 828 Classroom additions at Kentlake High School (F) 171 Classroom additions at Kent-Mendian High School (F) 79 Replacement with increased capacity for -396 Panther Lake Elementary (Funded) 500 Elementary # 31 (Funded) 500 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 27,150 27,321 27,504 27,504 28,004 28,004 28,004 Interim Relocatable Capacity Elementary Relocatable Capacdy Required 0 48 192 336 24 192 504 Middle School Relocatable Capacity Required 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Senior High Relocatable Capacrty Rea u: red 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Relocatable Capacity Required 1&6 0 48 192 336 24 192 504 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 27,150 1 27,369 1 27,696 1 27,840 1 28,028 1 28,196 28,508 TOTAL FTE ENROLLMENT,' PROJECTION 1 25,745 1 26,064 1 26,480 1 26,564 1 26,743 1 27,014 27,363 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 1 1,405 1,305 1,216 1,276 1,285 1,182 1,145 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes 2 FTE = Full Time Equivalent Enrollment (i a 1/2 day Kindergarten student = 5 & Full Day Kindergarten student = 1 0 FTE) 3 In Fall 2004, 9th grade moved to the high schools which Increased capacity available at Middle School level 4 Sequoia Middle School was renovated and reconfigured as Kent Phoenix Academy High School In Fall 2007. 5 Phase I I of renovation continues for Mill Creek Middle School & Kent Technology Academy 6 2007-2008 total classroom relocatable capacity is 1,470 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 Apnl 2008 Page 20 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH - Grades 9 - 12 [Senior High Permanent Capacity' 8,165 8,515 Changes to High School Ca acct 4 Kent Phoenix Academy - Replaced Sequoia Middle School Estimated prog-am capacity 350 8,686 8,765 8,765 8,765 8,765 Classroom additions at Kentlake HS (F) 171 Classroom additions at Kent -Meridian HS and KM Technology Academy 4 (F) 79 Subtotal 8,515 8,686 8,765 81765 8,765 8,765 8,765 Relocatable Capacity Required ' 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 1 8,515 8,686 0 0 0 0 0 765 8,765 8,765 8,765 8,765 FTE ENROLLMENTlPROJECTION 2 I 8,407 8,368 8,522 8,418 8,351 8,335 SCHOOL YEAR 2007-2008 2008-2009 1 2009-2010 1 2010-2011 1 2011-2012 2012-2013 1 2013-2014 Actual P R O J E C T E D 108 318 243 347 414 430 336 [Senior High Permanent Capacity' 8,165 8,515 Changes to High School Ca acct 4 Kent Phoenix Academy - Replaced Sequoia Middle School Estimated prog-am capacity 350 8,686 8,765 8,765 8,765 8,765 Classroom additions at Kentlake HS (F) 171 Classroom additions at Kent -Meridian HS and KM Technology Academy 4 (F) 79 Subtotal 8,515 8,686 8,765 81765 8,765 8,765 8,765 Relocatable Capacity Required ' 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 1 8,515 8,686 0 0 0 0 0 765 8,765 8,765 8,765 8,765 FTE ENROLLMENTlPROJECTION 2 I 8,407 8,368 8,522 8,418 8,351 8,335 8,429 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 108 318 243 347 414 430 336 Number of Relocatables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Classroom RelDcatables required at this time Some Relocatables used for classroom and program purposes ' Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes 2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment, excluding College -only Running Start students 3 Grade level reconfiguration - All 9th grade students moved to the high schools to Fall 2004 4 Sequoia Middle School was renovated and reconfigured as a new non-traditional high school, Kent Phoenix Academy, and KM added a new Technology Academy program in 2007-08 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A April 2008 Page 21 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY MIDDLE SCHOOL - Grades 7 - 8 Middle School Permanent Capacity' 5,150 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 Changes to Middle School Capacity 4 Mill Creek Middle School - Kent Junior High re -opened as Mill Creek Middle School #7a in Fall 2005 Phase 2 of Mill Creek Renovation continues in 2007-08 Program capacity of Mill Creek MS and Kent Tec-nology Acacemy 828 5 Sequoia Middle School renovated and reconfigured as Kent Phoenix Academy High School in 2007-08 MS Capacity changed m High School -771 Subtotal 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 Relocatable Capacity Required' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 1&3 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 2 4,314 4,221 4,250 4,282 4,347 4,467 4,400 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 893 986 957 925 860 740 807 No Classroom Re ocatables requ!red at middle schools at this time Some Relocatables used for classroom and program purposes 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes 2 FTE. = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment! Projection 3 Grade level reconfiguration - All 9th grade students moved to the high schools In Fall 2004 4 Mill Creek Middle School & Technology Academy - Kent Junior High was renovated and re -opened In Fall 2005 with a Technology Academy serving 7th & 8th grade students from all service areas Phase I I of Mill Greek renovation continues in 2007-08. 5 Sequoia Middle School was renovated and reconfigured as non-traditional Kent Phoenix Academy High School in 2007-08 and middle school boundaries were reconfigured for six middle schools district -wide Kent School Distract Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B April 2008 Page 22 SCHOOL YEAR 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009 2G10 2010-2011 1 2011.2012 2012-2D13 2013-2014 Actual P R O J E C T E D Middle School Permanent Capacity' 5,150 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 Changes to Middle School Capacity 4 Mill Creek Middle School - Kent Junior High re -opened as Mill Creek Middle School #7a in Fall 2005 Phase 2 of Mill Creek Renovation continues in 2007-08 Program capacity of Mill Creek MS and Kent Tec-nology Acacemy 828 5 Sequoia Middle School renovated and reconfigured as Kent Phoenix Academy High School in 2007-08 MS Capacity changed m High School -771 Subtotal 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 Relocatable Capacity Required' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 1&3 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 2 4,314 4,221 4,250 4,282 4,347 4,467 4,400 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 893 986 957 925 860 740 807 No Classroom Re ocatables requ!red at middle schools at this time Some Relocatables used for classroom and program purposes 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes 2 FTE. = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment! Projection 3 Grade level reconfiguration - All 9th grade students moved to the high schools In Fall 2004 4 Mill Creek Middle School & Technology Academy - Kent Junior High was renovated and re -opened In Fall 2005 with a Technology Academy serving 7th & 8th grade students from all service areas Phase I I of Mill Greek renovation continues in 2007-08. 5 Sequoia Middle School was renovated and reconfigured as non-traditional Kent Phoenix Academy High School in 2007-08 and middle school boundaries were reconfigured for six middle schools district -wide Kent School Distract Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B April 2008 Page 22 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY - Grades K - 6 Elementary Permanent Capacity' 1 13,012 13,428 13,428 13,532 13,532 14,032 14,032 Kent Mountain View Academy 2 416 Chan es to Elementary Capacity Replacement with projected 104 net increased capacity for -396 Panther Lake Elementary (Funded)4 500 Elementary # 31 (Funded) 5 subtotal 13,428 13,428 13,532 13,532 14,032 14,032 14,032 lRelocatable Capacity Required' 0 48 192 336 24 192 504 SCHOOL YEAR 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 1 2010-20.1 2011-2012 1 2012-2013 1 2013-2014 Actual P R O 1 E C T E D Elementary Permanent Capacity' 1 13,012 13,428 13,428 13,532 13,532 14,032 14,032 Kent Mountain View Academy 2 416 Chan es to Elementary Capacity Replacement with projected 104 net increased capacity for -396 Panther Lake Elementary (Funded)4 500 Elementary # 31 (Funded) 5 subtotal 13,428 13,428 13,532 13,532 14,032 14,032 14,032 lRelocatable Capacity Required' 0 48 192 336 24 192 504 TOTAL CAPACITY ` 13,428 13,476 13,724 13,868 14,056 14,224 14,536 FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 3 13,024 13,475 13,708 13,864 14,045 14,212 14,534 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 404 1 16 4 11 12 2 Number of Relocatables Required 0 2 8 14 1 8 21 21 Classroom Relocatables required in 2012-13 Some additional Relocatables used for classroom and program purposes 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and is updated periodically to reflect program changes 2 Kent Mountain View Academy is a special program at the former Grandview School serving students In Grades 2 - U. The school building (formerly Kent Learning Center & Grandview Elem ) was designed as an elementary school 3 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or Projection (Kindergarten @ 5 or 1 0 & excluding ECE) Kindergarten projection is at 5 FTE for Half Day Kridergarten programs or optional Tuition -based Full Day Kindergarten Kindergarten project= is at 1 0 FTE for Full Day Kindergarten programs funded by State Apportionment, Title I or 1-728 grants 4 Panther Lake Elementary will be replaced and built on a new site with increased capacity In 2009 5 Site selection and construction timing for Elementary #31 is pending review of location and capacity needs Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C April 2008 Page 23 VIII Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2008 - 2009 through 2013 - 2014. The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on voter approval of future bond issues, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. Kent Elementary #27a, which opened in January 1999 as a replacement for the original Kent Elementary School, was the last elementary school for which the District received state matching funds under the state funding formula. Millennium Elementary #30 which opened in the fall of 2000 was the last elementary school constructed in the District Voters approved a $69.5 million bond issue for Capital Construction and Improvements in February 2002 The bond issue partial� funded building additions at three high schools which coincided with moving 9 grade students to the senior high in September 2004. The District received some state matching funds and has utilized impact fees for the senior high school additions. In February 2006, voters approved a $106 million bond issue for replacement of Panther Lake Elementary School with increased capacity to be built on a new site, as well as construction of a new elementary school to accommodate growth. The bond issue also funded Phase H of the renovation for Mill Creek Middle School and renovation of Sequoia Middle School for reconfiguration as a new non-traditional high school. Kent Phoenix Academy opened at the former Sequoia Middle School site in September 2007. 2006 construction funding approval will also provide some additional classrooms to be constructed at Kentlake and Kent -Meridian High Schools. Some impact fees will be utilized for the new construction that will increase capacity. Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary and high school level and unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future. Some funding is secured for additional portables and some will be funded from impact fees. For the Six -Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Facilities Department. Please see pages 26-27 for a summary of the cost basis. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 24 r Za J CL L) LU Z � Z _a Z J LL O� x W U � U7 X_ 2 y W Y U N J a M a N N 0 N CD N 0 0 N t7o O �D O M Q N 63 c"I N ll] O 69 1 O n v o O m o O O O CD O OO O O IP O O Ln LO O O ONO O W v cn If)Ln vi b4 erLO V)O ti U O N 6s u� W � N �i N O co to LL W W d v _ W F O O H w O O 2 c� Cl O ID O 00Lo Lf] as O O O Y! m E a as m m w r O O O O O 2 O O C C O O O O O O O O O O f0 LO O d u7 Ifi O p Or O fLn R L O � T U c U W cO c J m b9 to NM fR efl LL d c c m Q to o o m E O O O O O O O LL L LO o O 0 o I, Lf)0� o If) Ln Ln I_ Iq to N U) V Oi N N} O.J. d9 N !9 Vi N 603, Vi t7o O �D O M Q N 63 c"I N ll] O 69 1 O n v + o O m o O LL LL LL LL LL LL LL Ou0, N If)Ln E yn V)O ti U N 69 In CN � N �i N O co to LL W W v _ W F Q H w J O 2 c� O O O 00Lo as O O O z m E a as m m w r O O O O O 2 O O O Y ? P OLn U N f0 � G c W C O ff3 fLn R cr o Y Y Y J Z � T U c U W cO c J m efl LL + LL LL LL LL LL LL LL E {C W W v _ W F Q H w J 2 c� LU z m E a as m m w r d = O 4 F- 2 O O z Y ? P G c W U cr o Y Y Y J Z c U W cO c J m LL d c c m Q o o m E I v l- m a LL L Q ¢ a w CQ Q VIII Finance Plan - Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last elementary school, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost of the next elementary school. Elementary School Cost Projected Cost Millennium Elementary 430 Opened in 2000 $12,182,768 Cost of Panther Lake Elementary Replacement (To open In 2009) $5,700,000 $25,500,000 Projected cost of Elementary #31 in 2012 $2,500,000 $29,750,000 Construction cost of the additions to high schools: Senior High School Additions Projected Cost Total Kent Phoenix Academy Renovations $1,650,000 2008 Addition to Kentlake High School $5,700,000 2009 Addition to Kent -Meridian HS $2,500,000 Construction cost of new HS capacity $9,850,000 Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years Please see Table 7 on page 27 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. District Adjustment The impact fee calculations on pages 29 and 30 include a "District Adjustment" which is equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas drive out for this year and adjusted for increase in the Consumer Price Index. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 26 m m � U c0 0 P: m -'t > Ln occ D °' co > co H N691 o a 69 E ' s v m d v m O) 0 LU fn Q~j F3 r 00 M c0 ch co N > Q 69 E ti M co co m cc Lac ONO Lf) N M I ~ 0 10. O N M � 69 � Efi 69 64 6�4 � 60 a O O O O M r CO O Q1 OJ O O O LLQ .— O N Ln lz O M M O O a) (n U Lf) O LO 0 M LO M � 64 69 r M M 69 6-i "i m M � 64 69 69 6% 69 69 ti r a 69 U a O O 14 M M r 00 M - @ U t� 11 O C QI N �- m (D ' Cl) ~ M CSD LLO N O O O p n CO � U a C) f/j p m N co er co fl7 o z s co co a °' a co N Y Cn m (n m m a fn c m m NN U') V LL N M N LU 0 LU LU LU VJ (A (n Cl) 7 X X 0 M N _ N O O r LO O O O V W N O c7 N O O a O O O 0 N co 9 N co Cl) m O O QI 01 6~1 m m 0 2 N N O } 4 N p Q c w E C7 CU a n m c c c Q C N m ctlt -e L _ CU m } m m ° 5 a a ami m Y c i E m O Q = L m O y y L U (DO` O ^ LM .!C O E O @ O Y m m O U a fcCL Y E o o a ° y � C C � o`_ C � m O ((D � 2 O Q L "O N O .� Z a' O O 0 CL `7 U U) E ro 2 41 -� c 'O U Q m CL y m w c o o m 003 m O U = 2 m a m m o 2_ _ c r CL c r J U Y m OE Y 0 = CO m a CL C ° d J J "�'� U > E 5 ° LL m L T Y O O r m E C U U g c c N Y Y m m `LJ o CL C D Z c co c = Y C Y L Y a E Z 0 0 05 0 p CL c u c £ 2 a 2 m m m ro m� Vi m 'E O 7 7 7 2 C m O 7 c c c W T Ln U _ V) ti H KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors - Single Family Student Generation Factors - Multi -Family x Elementary (Grades K - 6) 0 445 Elementary 0.296 x Middle School (Grades 7 - 8) 0 118 Middle School 0 075 x Senior High (Grades 9 - 12) 0 245 Senior High 0 111 X Total 0 808 Total 0 482 Projected Increased Student Capacity OSPI -Square Footage per Student x Elementary 500 Elementary 90 x Middle School 1,065 Middle School 117 x Senior High 550 Senior High 130 Special Education 144 Required Site Acreage per Facility x Elementary (required) 11 x Middle School (required) 21 x Senior High (required) 32 Average Site Cost I Acre Elementary $288,346 Middle School $0 Senior High $0 New Facility Construction Cost x Elementary* $29,750,000 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost x Middle School $0 Elementary @ 24 $117,550 x Senior High * $9,850,000 Middle School @ 29 $0 • See cost basis on Pg 26 Senior High @ 31 $0 Temporary Facility Square Footage x Elementary 74,340 x Middle School 22,128 x Senior High 22,960 X Total 4% 119,428 State Match Credit Current State Match Percentage 5706% Area Cost Allowance ACA - Costi'Sq. Ft. Area Cost Allowance (Effective July 08) $16879 Permanent f=acility Square Footage x Elementary 1,475,936 x Middle School 660,904 District Average Assessed Value x Senior High 1,107,101 Single Family Residence $316,091 X Total 96% 3,243,941 Total Facilities Square Footage x Elementary 1,550,276 x Middle School 683,032 x Senior High 1,130,061 X Total 3,363,369 Developer Provided Sites ! Facilities Value 0 Dwelling Units 0 District Average Assessed Value Multi -Family Residence $102,465 Apartments 72% Condos 28% Capital Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 Current / S1,000 Tax Rate (1 73255) $1 73 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Current Bond Interest Rate 5 11% Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Apnl 2008 Page 28 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula ((Acres x Cost per Acre) I Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula ((Facility Cost/ Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) $2,82291 $0 $0 $2,82291 Required Site Acreage I Average Site Cost/Acre I Facility Capacity I Student Factor A 1 (Elementary) 11 $288,346 500 0 445 A 2 (Middle School) 21 $0 1,065 0 118 A 3 (Senior High) 32 $0 1,000 0 245 $0 B 3 (Senior High) $9,650,000 0 808 0 245 096 $4,21222 A Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula ((Facility Cost/ Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) $2,82291 $0 $0 $2,82291 State Match Credit per Single Family Residence Formula Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x District Match % x Student Factor I Area Cost Allowance Construction Cost Facility Capacity I Student Factor I Footage Ratio $16879 B 1 (Elementary) $29,750,000 500 0 445 096 $25,41840 B 2 (Middle School) $0 1,065 0 118 096 $0 B 3 (Senior High) $9,650,000 550 0 245 096 $4,21222 0 808 B C' $29,63062 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence Formula ((Facility Cost/ Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary /Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity I Student Factor I Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $117,550 24 0 445 004 $8718 C 2 (Middle School) $0 29 0 118 0.04 $0 C 3 (Senior High) $0 31 0 245 004 $0 0 808 C b $8718 State Match Credit per Single Family Residence Formula Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x District Match % x Student Factor I Area Cost Allowance I SPI Sq Ft I Student I District Match °o I Student Factor I D 1 (Elementary) $16879 90 05706 0 445 D2 (Middle School) $15879 117 0 0 118 D 3 (Senior High) $16879 130 0 5706 0 245 D *. Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value Current Capital Levy Rate / $1,000 Current Bond Interest Rate Years Amortized (10 Years) Developer Provided Facility Credit Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence Subtotal D = State Match Credit per Residence TC = Tax Credit per Residence $316,091 $1 73 511% 10 TC b Facility / Site Value I Dwelling Units 0 0 $2,82291 $29,63062 $87 18 $6,92480 $4,20556 $32,54071 Subtotal - $11,13036 FC b Total Unfunded Need $21,41035 50% Developer Fee Obligation $10,705 FC = Facility Credit (if applicable) 0 District Adjustment (See Page 26 for explanation) ($5,401) Net Fee Obligation per Single Family Residence 1 $5,304 $3,85728 $0 S.'i 067 F9 , Eb,y14 80 $4,20556 0 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Apnl 2008 Page 29 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent ! Total Square Footage Ratio) $1,577 71 Construction Cost Facade Capacity I Required S,te Acreage I Average Site CcsJAcre I Facility Capacity I Student Factor A 1 (Elementary) 11 $288,346 500 0 296 A 2 (Middle School) 21 $0 1,065 0 075 A 3 (Senior High) 32 $0 1,000 0 111 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi-Famlly Residence Unit A = Site Acquisition per Multi -Family Unit $1,87771 0 482 Faci ty Ccs: Fac,lity Capauty I Student =actor Footage Ratio A Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent ! Total Square Footage Ratio) $1,577 71 Construction Cost Facade Capacity I Student Factor I Footage Ratio Current Capital Levy Rate / 51,000 B 1 (Elementary) $29,750,C00 500 0 296 096 $16,90752 B 2 (Middle School) $0 1:065 0 075 096 $0 B 3 (Senior High) $9,850,000 550 0 111 096 $1,90839 0 0 482 B $18,81591 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi-Famlly Residence Unit A = Site Acquisition per Multi -Family Unit $1,87771 Formula ((Facility Cost/ Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary/ Total Square Footage Ratio) Faci ty Ccs: Fac,lity Capauty I Student =actor Footage Ratio C t (Elementary) $117,550 24 0 296 004 $5799 C 2 (Middle School) $0 29 0 075 004 $0 C 3 (Senior High) $0 31 0 111 004 $0 Total Unfunded Need 0 482 C $5799 State Match Credit per Multi -Family Residence Unit $7,716 FC = Facility Credit (if applicable) Formula Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x District Match % x Student Factor District Adjustment (See Page 26 for explanation) A.ea Cost Allowance I SPI Sq Ft i Student I Cistnct Match 9,6 Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $16879 90 05706 0 296 $2,56574 D 2 (Middle School) S16879 117 0 0 075 $0 D 3 (Sen or High) $16879 130 05706 0 111 $1,38978 D b $3,95552 Tax Credit per Multi -Family Residence Unit Average MF Residential Assessed Value $102,465 Current Capital Levy Rate / 51,000 $1 73 Current Bond Interest Rate 511% Years Amortized (10 Years) 10 TC b $1,36329 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility! S,te Value I Dwelling Units 0 0 FC b 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per Multi -Family Unit $1,87771 B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $18,81591 C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $5799 Subtotal $20,75161 D = State Match Credit per MF Unit $3,95552 TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit $1,36329 Subtotal - $5,31880 Total Unfunded Need $15,43281 50% Develcper Fee Obligation $7,716 FC = Facility Credit (if applicable) 0 District Adjustment (See Page 26 for explanation) ($4,450) Net Fee Obligation per Multi -Family Residence Unit 1 $3,266 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 30 IX Summary of Changes to April 2007 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993, The primary changes from the April 2007 Plan are summarized here Voters approved funding for replacement and expansion of Panther Lake Elementary School on a new site, a future new elementary school, classroom additions at high schools to accommodate new growth, Phase II of the renovation at Mill Creek Middle School and renovation of Sequoia Middle School reconfigured as new non-traditional high school named Kent Phoenix Academy. Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in class size as well as program changes Reduction in class size and extended learning opportunities for Student Achievement Initiative 728 are reflected in this update Changes in relocatables (portables) or transitional capacity reflect use, purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement between facilities. The student enrollment forecast is updated annually. Methodology for six-year Kindergarten projections was modified to meet the requirements for State Funded Full Day Kindergarten programs. The district expects to receive state matching funds for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Student generation factors were updated this year. Unfunded site and facility needs will be reviewed in the future Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors include: ITEM Grade/Type FROM TO Comments Student Generation Factor Elem 0 444 0 445 Single Family (SF) MS 0148 0 118 SH 0 252 0 245 Total ow 0 808 Biennial Update Student Generation Factor Elem 0 293 0 296 Multi -Family (MF) MS 0 058 0 075 SH 0 094 0 111 Total 0 445 0 482 Biennial Update State Match Credit 5594% 5706% Per OSPI Website Area Cost Allowance (former Boeckh Index) $16243 $16879 Per OSPI Website Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SF $282,605 $316,091 Per Puget Sound ESD AV - Average of Condominiums & Apts MF S89,689 $102,465 Per Puget Sound ESD Debt Service Capital Levy Rate 1$1000 $1 28 $1 73 Per King Co Assessor Report General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 408% 511% Market Rate Impact Fee - Single Family SF $5,110 $5,304 Change to fee + $194 Impact Fee - Multi -Family MF $3,146 $3,266 Change to fee + $120 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 31 0 Appendixes Appendix A: Calculations of Capacities for Elementary Schools Appendix B: Calculations of Capacities for Middle Schools Appendix C: Calculations of Capacities for Senior High Schools Appendix D: Use of Relocatables Appendix E; Student Generation Factor Survey Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Apnl 2008 Page 32 U) LU mJm of Q �a CU Z O J F 11 V IX OC C N D � J O OH Ow U Z_ - x t- F i- < F x m -• < .= r < F W - od < W F = < F - F Il Y7 O V f07 N M uN7 In 0 -t 0 m (�O In R 7 7 M 7 LL�7 O IOCI O G['i O S F d 4] G� CNO O O S O &3� S O S O N N O N Gn Z 0 M M R O M � R n O O 0 M GO O O M I� 0 O N f0 � O CD O Co a O W 't t� N O m m m ifJ N O N m M V O m In 0 N � M In a N V M 7 M '7 � �''] 7 � V •? v] v7 O 7 7 '7 � � 7 Gh M tCJ 1` M O D O N C O O O O O O N O N �j a O N O O O O N O O O O 1 O O O r N O O O O O O - N O r a N O tO O O O N O - O O O O I N N - a M N M - N - M M N O - O M O IO h N M - O M M N M O I �; ly d a a y p pp�� rp a fO�f Rr O O O O N O M In N Ln N °r° In M O O S O M O m S W G ri 4D O w N ti N M Gn Q a N r O 1• M GD M M o M f• 7 N m V In N M N Y � N N of �pp O M Co (4Do O O M S m O SOD O S COO O S m GOO n O O O O O S O 1f7 N It M V 7 q V V %o M a Ln a V 1n M M V 10 In In V V M N M N d Im 1 rn m m J p G r O O N a0 O In n 1. p GO Gn G9 n n O IMO m m w � U U U W w 3 o = V s(n 0 zz nJ a a a W uVi �pn E > J u 9 E ¢ E W m N b F O Irec a� d Eto ¢ F - m m ❑ Ol 7 9 w Wt=' m Gp E s m N 75, c •� O ~ O J C N C 7 U J U N T N U G y m c = L m C N O C W } G O m C T t Q F N V U OI N E C `m oo d m E a° ? 2 o y m m v a d m `m E 'm ° oo a E W E E U U U U W W 11 C 7 C7 (D 2 --� Y J Z LL d LL � (n U U (q C7 Y N W rn N O T U O w m y a W m U of W N N C X X � W ❑ O = I I U T t � OI aC n W C C Y m � E � G O O n co CL CL o U N V% = 11 N ¢ N a � In ac U- �LL F- c y I � H a Q Y C 11 Y Y I y 1 O a L m 3 j W 8 U I m m c a i _mE 7 LL W N 1 a � j U II 1 � _ G a O 4N1 B j m F � a u j o F- I o c 0 i r 7 > Ol i t a 8 G Y 1 N � j � ❑ L j LL 7 N I I • E Y d W LL 8 N C CL Q x 0 Z W IL Q ■ u 5 § CL CL « % / w zz \ )CO - LU n .j k ƒ 3 E 9 @ o c \ u 2? __= w w= r zCL LU o u )[o - \ o ul o 7 ) § LU e e ! LL E @ w / F = 2 0 ƒ m$ c2 ( / § � = c } m / cz % 5 q /; c \ ( ( CL ■ / 7 a § a 2 � & Gg (L 0CL k 0 / - \ / _ - ~ (; \ � - § / ` � \\ g Ln § I G to 'Ir� G� \ �_ & g ) § ) § _ < ƒ G N ~ ) § §i / LO � 2 * J 3 R \ A i § a@ m R R j[ d § k § ] § f \ $ > ■ [ LU 2 o o \ e / z \ k \ \ \ } ] } - I \ I § ) ■ u 5 § CL CL « % / w Lo r fl Z uj coJ Q N V 0 O J w O O L) w V Z W Y LO 0 0 @ — a ry O O N O r v � o Im ¢ O at N O ° M c0 j O V . - U) I.- N ON1 F aci .� Lm, w a rn o cm x N � o o r m o c � N O O C7 N O O O O LO O � Z o 0 0 N s T J O a _9 � m U N y O � O L Z o o N m � N r G U m N O � z o N y a' I ID U P o u oZo o N a+ u m m y U N co O D NOA M O U L z O O N m C a C N N U C m O n OZ o ci m J N LO 0 0 0 LO a ry O O N O r N N Im ¢ O at 0D O O T co Q e�V O O N - O O L P! O C.) O M Cl) U m Q CNf O D E Q1 Q cn CD O ON1 F aci .� Lm, w a rn o cm x N � o o r m o c � N O O C7 N O O O O 0 0l CO O O I cc O U W s c L O E c _m y i M M m EL co 0 N c a W a Z W a a Q L U m Q to CD m p O y t6 U m m D Q) E Q1 Q cn CD O E A o U m m C � u E m W aci .� Lm, w a rn o cm x N N m U i Q y a W a o E O �k U 0 0l CO O O I cc O U W s c L O E c _m y i M M m EL co 0 N c a W a Z W a a Q m a Q W x 0 Z W IL a a Fu (n = CO m M O 0) (D I- p N O O d O t0 h N O N O M O 00 M C' O h W O D7 O O M O (D O O N O) O M lfJ N O N O O O O O O 0 fl 0 U U LLr LL u> C o n N COu� o r- o o r o (D 0 d 00 C C 0 o o a O o 0 0 M 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 o 0 0 r � CC W c 4) O c � y E O W r O ti M d o O O cq N r O oM � O ! M O rn N N {� � EN O _ W � d CD MO In N O M In c0 Q O ((pp (D O p Ln N00) u7 C N N M r � Lo r (h O V 7 � 7 B Lo o � n oCO N (n = N N N N r O ti r N N M m r N ..w C .N- p (D N O in (D N I'. f- co O (D n O X a O M !") O V I, N W LO O M M ti LO N M Q N M O 00 O 00 E W N W N N (NO Vr' O ~ CD CCO 0 (D h M Op r- - N B oc N N o m C (n N t8 N O N O r M r T O N N r r N T r (D r N N E EC w v=i LL 0-0- d 7 N W LO O O of It N N m N p- co + 0o m O Go N O N A I- ti O M O O N r LCJ � y M N r ti � z C41 C y� E ¢ UU (Un 0 U U N = Z U _m 0 W > d =� it _ C Q Q 0-0 r Q f'� Y 0 r - 0 2 a Q O d -0Q oo E r Q O d ,D J N U m a 01 C o W o C O c N N m ro N c io o O a <LU p Ql F C rte+ U o C cm Q O n y o c 0 U Y m a > N /'1 U.c G1 C uiCC) ' V1 p U y 3 O N m N w Y inw W V1 U E Li c Y _ N U E li Y ° Cm = C Y o Z �7 'a m d C a W L2 ' �° O C @ ac's U °' M W c � 7 fn C > v m m E ° 0 a 'U H C 3 Z m`o d Ol FL- ' Y ` H o CD o �? O m rn o � rn o m o rn r �o a Q W x 0 Z W IL a a Fu (n = O_ O_ V N O M M e - r O O O O O O O O 0 0 U LLr N C o o o r o a o 0 O o 0 0 0 o c o o O cJ W c O � y E O W r O ti M d o O O cq N r O oM � O ! M O rn N r=+ Ln B Lo o � n oCO N (n = N N N N r O ti r N N M m r N ..w C .N- co N 07 E W N W N N (NO Vr' O ~ CD CCO 0 (D h M Op r- - N B oc N N o m _ N N O N r z E EC w v=i LL 0-0- d a m O I- C C41 C CL 0 > d =� it _ C Q Q 0-0 r Q f'� Y 0 r - 0 2 a Q O d -0Q oo E r Q O d ,D J N U m a 01 C o W o C O c N N m ro N o e a <LU a Q W x 0 Z W IL a a Fu DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE for Kent School District No 415 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Issued with a 14 -day comment and appeal period Description of Proposal: This threshold determination analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the following actions, which are so closely related to each other that they are in effect a single action 1 The adoption of the Kent School District 2008 Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan by the Kent School District for the purposes of planning for the facilities needs of the District. 2. The amendment of the King County Comprehensive Plan to include the Kent School District 2008 Capital Facilities Plan as a part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the King County Comprehensive Plan. 3 The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Kent to include the Kent School District's 2008 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Kent 4 The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Covington to include the Kent School District's 2008 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Covington 5. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Auburn to include the Kent School District's 2008 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Auburn. 6 The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Renton to include the Kent School District's 2008 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Renton 7 This proposal may also involve amendment of Comprehensive Plans of the Cities of Maple Valley, Black Diamond, and/or SeaTac to incorporate the Kent School District 2008 Capital Facilities Plan into the Capital Facilities element of that jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. Proponent. Kent School District Location of the Proposal: The Kent School District includes an area of approximately 72 square miles The City of Covington and portions of the cities of Kent, Auburn, Renton, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac fall within the District's boundaries, as do parts of unincorporated King County Lead Agency: Kent School District No. 415 is the lead agency pursuant to WAC 197-11-926. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that the proposal does not pose a probable significant adverse impact to the environment An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C 030 (2) (c) This decision was made after a review of the completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public upon request This Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2) The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issue Comments must be submitted by 4 00 p m , June 24, 2008 The responsible official will reconsider the DNS based on timely comments and may retain, modify, or, if significant adverse impacts are likely, withdraw the DNS If the DNS is retained, it will be final after the expiration of the comment deadline. Responsible Official- —�fV Fred igh Assistant Superintendent for Business Services Kent School District No 415 Telephone: (253) 373-7295 Address: 12033 SE 256th Street #A-600 Kent, Washington 98030-6643 Appeals of this determination are governed by Board Policy No 9280 which can be obtained from Fred High, Assistant Superintendent for Business Services, Kent School District No 415, 12033 SE 256th Street #A-600, Kent, Washington 98030-6643 and pursuant to WAC 197-11- 680 and RCW 43 21 C 075. Date of Issue: June 10, 2008 Date Published: June 14, 2008 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAC 197-11-960 Environmental Checklist. Purpose of Checklist, The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply " Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations Answer these questions if you can If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply" In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for nonproject actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "prepares," and "affected geographic area," respectively A BACKGROUND Name of proposed project, if applicable: The adoption of a six-year Capital Facilities Plan by the Kent School District The Comprehensive Plans of King County, City of Kent, City of Covington, City of Renton, City of Auburn and possibly Cities of Maple Valley, Black Diamond and SeaTac have been and/or will be amended to include the Kent School District 2008 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Plan Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan A copy of the District's Plan is available for review in the District Finance & Planning Department 2. Name of applicant. Kent School District No. 415. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Kent School District No 415 12033 SE 256th Street # A-600 Kent, WA 98030-6643 Contact Person: Fred H. High, Assistant Superintendent for Business Services Telephone: (253) 373-7295 4. Date checklist prepared May 27, 2008 5 Agency requesting checklist: Kent School District No 415 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The 2008 Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan is scheduled to be adopted in July, 2008 and forwarded to King County, Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, Renton, Maple Valley, Black Diamond, and SeaTac for possible inclusion in each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan The Capital Facilities Plan will be updated annually Site-specific projects have been or will be subject to project -specific environmental review 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The Capital Facilities Plan reviews additions to existing high schools, renovations at Mill Creek Middle School and Kent Phoenix Academy, and proposes construction replacing Panther Lake Elementary School and construction of a new elementary school. 8 List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal The above -referenced projects will undergo environmental review at the time of formal proposal 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. ►fR91 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known King County and Cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn will review and approve the Capital Facilities Plan for the purposes of impact fee ordinances and will need to adopt the Plan as an amendment to the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of King County and Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Auburn. Cities of Maple Valley, Black Diamond, and SeaTac may also review and approve the Plan for the purposes of any school impact fee ordinances and may adopt the Plan as all amendment to the Capital Facilities element of their Comprehensive Plans. 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the protect and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to descnbe certain aspects of your proposal You do not need to repeat those answers on this page (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on protect description ) This is a non -project action. This proposal involves the adoption of the Kent School District 2008 Capital Facilities Plan for the purpose of planning the facilities needs of the District and for inclusion in the Capital Facilities Plan element and possible amendment of the Comprehensive Plans for King County, City of Covington, City of Kent, City of Renton, City of Auburn, City of SeaTac, City of Maple Valley and City of Black Diamond. A copy of the Capital Facilities Plan may be viewed at the Kent School District Business Services Department office 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, township, and range, if known If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s) Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The 2008 Capital Facilities Plan will affect the Kent School District The District includes an area of approximately 72 square miles The City of Covington, and portions of the Cities of Kent, Auburn, Renton, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, SeaTac and parts of unincorporated King County fall within the District's boundaries B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The Kent School District is comprised of a variety of topographic land forms and gradients, including all of those listed_ Specific topographic characteristics will be identified during the planning and permit process for each capital project. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Specific slope characteristics will be identified during the planning and permit process for each capital project. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural sods, specify them and note any prime farmland. Specific soil types will be identified during the planning and permit process for each capital project d Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe Unstable soils may exist within the Kent School District Specific soil limitations on individual project sites will be identified at the time of environmental review e Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to project - specific environmental review and local approval at the time of proposal Proposed grading projects, as well as the purpose, type, quantity, and source of fill materials will be identified as appropriate to each project. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe It is possible that erosion could occur as a result of construction projects currently proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan Individual projects and their erosion impacts will be evaluated on a site-specific basis Individual projects will be subject to environmental review and local approval on the time of proposal. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings?) Percentage of impervious cover will vary with each capital facilities project and will be addressed during project -specific environmental review h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. Erosion potential on individual project sites will be addressed during project -specific environmental review Relevant erosion reduction and control requirements will be met 2. Air a What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known Various emissions, many construction -related, may result from individual projects. Air-quality impacts will be evaluated during project -specific environmental review Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions b Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Off-site sources and necessary mitigation will be addressed during project -specific environmental review Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any Plans for individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to environmental review and relevant local approval processes, including obtaining of any necessary air quality permits, at the time individual projects are formally proposed Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions 3. Water a. Surface - 1 ) urface• 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into There is a network of surface water bodies within the Kent School District The surface water regimes and flow patterns have been or will be researched and incorporated in the design of each individual project. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans Some projects may require work near these described waters Individual projects in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to environmental review and local approval requirements at the time the project is formally proposed 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected Indicate the source of fill material. Information with respect to placement or removal of fill or dredge material will be addressed at the time of protect -specific environmental review Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known Any surface water withdrawals or diversions have been or will be addressed during project -specific environmental review. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan Each capital facilities protect, if located in a floodplain area, will be required to meet applicable local regulations for flood areas 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Specific information regarding discharges of waste materials, if any, will be addressed during project -specific environmental review Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions b. Ground - 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may impact ground water resources Each protect will be evaluated during project -specific environmental review Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example Domestic sewage, industrial, containing the following chemicals , agricultural, etc ). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve Impacts of discharged waste material, if any, have been or will be addressed during site-specific, project -level environmental review 4. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known) Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may have varying storm water runoff consequences Each protect will be subject to environmental review and applicable local regulations 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? if so, generally describe Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will have varying environmental impacts and will be subject to appropriate review and local regulations prior to construction. Information regarding waste materials will be presented at the time of such review Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. d Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, of any Specific measures to reduce or control runoff impacts have been or will be developed on a project -specific basis in cooperation with the appropriate jurisdiction Plants: a Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree. fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants cattail, buttercup, water plants water lily, eelgrass, other types of vegetation bulrush, skunk cabbage, other milfoii, other There are various vegetative zones within the Kent School District. An inventory of species has been or will be produced as part of project -specific environmental review. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Impacts on vegetation will be determined at the time of project -specific environmental review at the time the project is formally proposed Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Specific impacts to these species from individual projects has been or will be determined at the time of project proposal and will be addressed during site-specific, project -level environmental review, d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to environmental review and local approval at the time of project proposal. 5. Animals: a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other. mammals deer, bear, elk, beaver, other fish bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other - An inventory of species observed on or near sites has been or will be developed during project -specific environmental review. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Specific impacts to these species from individual projects will be determined at the time of protect proposal and will be reviewed in cooperation with the affected jurisdictions c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Impacts on migration routes, if any, will be addressed during site-specific, project - level environmental review. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Appropriate measures to preserve or enhance wildlife have been or will be determined at the time of site-specific, project -level environmental review 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc The State Board of Education requires a life -cycle cost analysis of all heating, lighting, and insulating systems prior to allowing specific protects to proceed. Energy needs will be decided at the time of specific engineering and site design planning Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe Individual projects of this Capital Facilities Plan will be evaluated as to their impact on the solar potential of adjacent projects during environmental review. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any Energy conservation measures will be considered at the project -specific design phase and environmental review 7 Environmental Health: a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Proposed projects will comply with all current codes, standards, and rules and regulations Individual projects have been or will be subject to environmental review and local approval at the time of formal submittal b. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example traffic, equipment, operation, other)? A variety of noises exist within the Kent School District. Specific noise sources have been or will be identified during project -specific environmental review 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site Normal construction noises would exist on a short-term basis during school construction There could be an increase in traffic or operations -related noise which would be addressed during project specific environmental review Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Project noise impacts have been or will be evaluated and mitigated during the project -specific environmental review Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations 8 Land and Shoreline Use: a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? There are a variety of land uses within the Kent School District, including residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, utility, agricultural, forestry, open space, recreational, etc. b. Has the site been used for agriculture'? If so, describe This question will be addressed during site-specific, project -level environmental review c. Describe any structures on the site Structures located on proposed sites have been or will be identified and described during project -specific environmental review when appropriate d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Structures to be demolished, if any, will be identified as part of the project -specific environmental review process e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? There are a variety of zoning classifications within the Kent School District Site specific zoning information has been or will be identified during project -specific environmental review f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? An inventory of comprehensive plan designations has been or will be completed during project -specific environmental review. 10 g If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Any shoreline master program designations have been or will be identified during project -specific environmental review. h Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify Environmentally sensitive areas, if any, will be identified during project -specific environmental review 1. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? This information has been or will be provided at the time of protect -specific environmental review j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? it is not anticipated that proposed projects will displace any people Displacement of people, if any, will be evaluated during project -specific environmental review. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any, Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to project - specific environmental review and local approval at the time the project is formally proposed I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any Compatibility of the proposal and specific projects with existing uses and plans have been or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive planning process and during project -specific environmental review. 9. Housing a Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. No housing units would be provided. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing Any impact of project proposals on existing housing have been or would be evaluated during project -specific environmental review procedures 11 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Measures to reduce or control any housing impacts have been or will be addressed during site-specific, project -level environmental review. 10. Aesthetics: a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Aesthetic impacts have been or will be determined at the time of site-specific, project - level environmental review b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Aesthetic impacts have been or will be determined at the time of site-specific, project - level environmental review c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any - Appropriate measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts have been or will be determined at the time of project -specific environmental review 11. Light and Glare: a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light or glare impacts have been or will be determined at the time of project -specific environmental review b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Light or glare impacts have been or will be determined at the time of project -specific environmental review. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Off-site sources of light or glare have been or will be evaluated at the time of project specific environmental review d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any Mitigation of light and glare impacts has been or will be addressed during project - specific environmental review 12 12. Recreation: a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are a variety of formal and informal recreational facilities within the Kent School District b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Recreational impacts have been or will be addressed during project specific environmental review Projects in the Capital Facilities Plan may enhance recreational opportunities and uses c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any Any adverse effects on recreation stemming from individual project proposals have been or will be subject to mitigation during the environmental review procedure A school site usually provides recreational facilities to the community in the form of additional play fields and gymnasiums 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: a Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe The existence of historic and cultural resources will be determined at the time of project -specific environmental review. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. An inventory of historical sites has been or will be conducted as part of project specific environmental review. c Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed on a project -specific basis. 14. Transportation: a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system Show on site plans, if any Impact on public streets and highways has been or will be assessed during project - specific environmental review 13 b Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The relationship between specific projects and public transit has been or will be assessed during project -specific environmental review c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? An inventory of parking spaces and the impacts of specific projects on parking spaces has been or will be conducted during project -specific environmental review d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private) The development of new schools may require new access roads or streets. This issue will be fully addressed during project -specific environmental review. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe Use of water, rail or air transportation has been or will be addressed during site- specific, project -level environmental review f How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur Each project proposal has been or will be separately evaluated as to traffic impacts g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any Mitigation of impacts on transportation has been or will be addressed during project - specific environmental review. 15. Public Services: a Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example - fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe The District does not anticipate that the projects identified in the Capital Facilities Plan will substantially increase the need for other public services Impacts have been or will be evaluated on a project -specific basis b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Schools are built with automatic security systems, fire alarms, smoke alarms, heat sensors and sprinkler systems. 14 16. Utilities: a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other Utilities available at protect saes have been or will be identified during project specific environmental review. b Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed Utility revisions and construction needs will be identified during project -specific environmental review C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision Signature: Fredi h ssistant Supen6ddent for Business Services Date Submitted: June 10, 2008 15 D SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water, emissions to air, production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? To the extent this Plan makes it more likely that school facilities will be constructed, and/or renovated or remodeled, some of these environmental impacts will be more likely Additional impermeable surfaces, such as roofs, parking lots, sidewalks, access roads and playgrounds will increase storm water runoff, which could enter surface or ground water. Emissions to air could result from heating systems, emergency generators and other equipment, and from additional car and bus trips to and from the school for students and faculty. Any emissions resulting from this Plan should not regwre the production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances, with the possible exception of storage of diesel fuel or gasoline for emergency generating equipment Noise may result from additional traffic and from concentrating several hundred children at a new facility, especially before and after school and during recesses To the extent this proposal allows additional residential development to occur, these impacts would also increase somewhat, but it is not possible to quantify those impacts at this time The impacts would depend on the type, location and distribution of housing, for example, whether single or multiple family and the location of the school. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Facilities implementing the Plan have been or will be evaluated at the project specific level and impacts will be mitigated accordingly Storm water detention and runoff will meet applicable County and/or City requirements and, depending on the date of actual construction, may be subject to a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permitting requirements Discharges to air will be minimal, and will meet any applicable requirements of the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Authority Fuel oil will be stored according to local and state requirements. 16 2 How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The Plan itself will have no impact on these elements of the environment Depending on the particular site, construction of facilities may require clearing sites of plants and loss of animal habitat. To the extent residential development is allowed, additional area may be cleared and eliminated as habitat for animals There are not likely to be any impacts on fish or marine life, although some water quality degradation in streams and rivers could occur due to increased residential development These impacts have been or will be addressed in more detail during protect -specific environmental review when appropriate. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Individual projects will be evaluated and mitigated appropriately on a project -specific basis, but specific mitigation proposals cannot be identified at this time. 3 How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Any actual projects resulting from this Plan would consume heating fuel and electrical energy. Increased traffic resulting from the construction of additional facilities would consume petroleum based fuels Reduced traffic resulting from construction of another neighborhood school may also reduce amounts of fuel consumed, but it is not possible to quantify such reduction in consumption at this time These impacts have been or will be addressed in more detail during project -specific environmental review when appropriate Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Facilities would be constructed in accordance with applicable energy efficiency standards 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection, such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The Plan and facilities constructed pursuant to the Plan should have no impact on these resources It is not possible to predict whether other development made possible by this Plan would affect sensitive areas Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: No specific measures are being proposed at this time Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed during project -specific review Annual updates of this Plan will be coordinated with King County, Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, SeaTac, Renton and Black Diamond as part of the Growth Management Act process, one of the purposes of which is to protect environmentally sensitive areas To the extent the School District's faciitties planning process is part of the overall growth management planning process, these resources are more likely to be protected 17 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The Plan will not have any impact on land or shoreline use that is incompatible with existing comprehensive plans, land use codes, or shoreline management plans Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None are proposed at this time Actual facilities constructed to implement the Plan will be sited and constructed to avoid or reduce land use impacts. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? This proposal should not create substantial new demands for transportation The protects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create an increase to traffic near new District facilities but also reduce traffic by creating the opportunity for more students to walk to a closer school The construction of the facilities included in the Capital Facilities Plan may result in minor increases in the demand for public services and utilities, such as fare and police protection, and water, sewer, and electric utilities None of these impacts are likely to be significant The impacts on transportation and public services and utilities of the protects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be addressed during project -level review when appropriate Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: No measures to reduce or respond to such demands are proposed at this time. 7 Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment The Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan will not conflict with any laws or requirements for the protection of the environment 18 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BOARD OF EDUCATION Ed Barney Amye Bronson -Doherty Tony Moore Suzanne Smith Vacant Position SUPERINTENDENT Thomas R. Murphy FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS I INTRODUCTION 2-3 SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction 4 Inventory of Educational Facilities 5 Inventory of Non -Instructional Facilities 6 Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities 7 Needs Forecast - New Facilities 8 Six Year Finance Plan 9 SECTION 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Introduction 11 Map - Elementary Boundaries 12 Map - Middle school Boundaries 13 Map - Senior High Boundaries 14 SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction 15 Building Capacities 16-17 Portable Locations 18-19 Student Forecast 20-22 Capacity Summaries 23-27 King County Impact Fee Calculations 28-30 SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2008 31-33 PLAN 1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended. City of Kent Ordinance No 3260 effective March 1996, and the City of Auburn Ordinance No. 5078 effective 1998. Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 2008 Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2009 This Plan is scheduled for adoption by King County, the City of Kent, City of Federal Way and the City of Auburn and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date. the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The City of Des Moines collects school impact fees as part of the SEPA process. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing, jobs, services. culture and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies. The District has prepared a multi phase plan for the renovation and construction of Federal Way Schools and support buildings The Board authorized presenting the $149 million bond on May 15. 2007. The bond, passed at 63.93%, will replace four elementary schools, Lakeland, Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla and one middle school Lakota. Plans to replace Federal Way High School and Decatur High School and to increase capacity by approximately 400 students at each school are planned in later phases. Federal Way High School was built in 1938. It has been added onto at least 10 times and currently has an almost maze -like layout Based on an annual 4% increase in construction cost, the estimated cost to rebuild Federal Way High School is $122 million. Because of continued construction inflation, estimated construction costs will be re- calculated prior to the next bond election. None of the cost to replace Federal Way or Decatur High School is included in the Impact Fee calculation in this Plan 2 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The non -instructional projects included in the plan will consolidate support services operations at a single location. The current Transportation and Maintenance facility cannot continue to meet the District needs in the future Nutrition services and other administrative functions will also relocate to this centralized location. In September 2007 Woodmont Elementary School began a K-8 program by adding a 6t' grade. In the 2008/09 school year Woodmont will add a 7t' grade to this program. In March 2008, the Board approved a second K-8 program at Nautilus Elementary School. Nautilus will begin the 2008/09 school year with K -6t' grade As the program grows there will more data available about the unique facility needs for this grade configuration. The District is opening a new school in September 2008. The Technology Access Foundation (TAF) Academy will provide a small school setting for 6'h through 121h grade students This academy is funded through a unique public/private partnership between the Technology Access Foundation and Federal Way Public Schools. The focus of the school is Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM). The TAF Academy will open in September of 2008 with students in grades 6, 7 and 9. Additional grades will be added in successive years with a target population of about 350. The TAF Academy will open in a separate facility on the Totem Campus, The District will purchase and site new portables this summer to house 10 classrooms A current modular portable structure with four classrooms will become part of the TAF facility. The impacts to capacity span middle school and high school At full enrollment, the TAF Academy will help to lessen some of the high school capacity deficiency. The capacity increases are noted in the Capital Facilities Plan 2008/09 school year. The District continues to study school boundaries as new housing and fluctuating populations impact specific schools. Some shifts in boundaries may be required in the coming year. k] FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 1 - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools A Financial Plan that shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization listed follows this. 4 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Adelaide 1635 SW 304th Street Federal Way 98023 Brigadoon 3601 SW 336th Street Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 298th Street Auburn 98001 Enterprise 35101 5th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Green Gables 32607 47th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lake Grove 303 SW 308th Street Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35827 32"d Avenue S Auburn 98001 Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Road Federal Way 98003 Meredith Hill 5830 S 300th Street Auburn 98001 Mirror Lake 625 S314 1h Street Federal Way 98003 Nautilus 1000 S 289th Street Federal Way 98003 Olympic View 2626 SW 327th Street Federal Way 98023 Panther Lake 34424 1st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368th Street Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 34600 12th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Silver Lake 1310 SW 325th Place Federal Way 98023 Star Lake 4014 S 270th Street Kent 98032 Sunnycrest 2462942 d Avenue S Kent 98032 Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42"d Avenue S Auburn 98001 Wildwood 2405 S 300th Street Federal Way 98003 Woodmont 26454 16th Avenue S Des Moines 98198 MIDDLE SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Academy 34620 91h Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Illahee 36001 1 st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Kilo 4400 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 314th Street Federal Way 98023 Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Road Federal Way 98003 Saghahe 33914 19th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Sequoyah 3450 S 3601h ST Auburn 98001 Totem 266304 01h Ave S Kent 98032 TAF Academy 26630 401h Ave S Kent 98032 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Decatur 2800 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 30611 16th Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288th Street Auburn 98001 Todd Beamer 35999 16th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Harry S Truman 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS Merit School 36001 1't Ave S Federal Way 98003 LEASED SPACES Internet Academy 32020 1 st Ave S Federal Way 98003 5 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CURRENT INVENTORY NON -INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Developed Property Administrative Building 31405 18th Avenue S Federal Way 98003 MOT Site 1066 S 320th Street Federal Way 98003 Central Kitchen 1344 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 Leased Space Community Resource Center 1813 S Commons Federal Way 98003 Available Office Space 30819 14th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Undeveloped Property Site 4 Location 75 SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW — 9.2 Acres 65 S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S — 8.8 Acres 60 E of 10th Avenue SW - SW 334th & SW 335th Streets - 10.04 Acres 73 N of SW 3201h and east of 45'j' PL SW — 23.45 Acres 71 S 344th Street & 46th Avenue S - 17.47 Acres 82 1St Way S and S 342nd St— Minimal acreage 74 3737 S 360th St - 47.13 Acres (Part of this site is being used for Sequoyah Middle School) 96 S308 th St and 14" Ave S — .36 Acres 81 S332 d St and 9th Ave S — 20 Acres Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. 9 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS Purchase and Relocate Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is Portables Impact Fees. Elementary Schools: Replace Existing Buildings Voter approved bonds. Lakeland, Panther Lake, Increase capacity at Lakeland, Sunnycrest and Valhalla Panther Lake. Sunnycrest and Valhalla by a total of 200 seats Lakota Middle School Replace Existing Building Voter approved bonds Federal Way High School Replace Existing Building, Future bond authorization Increase Capacity Decatur High School Replace Existing Building, Future bond authorization. Increase Capacity The District is also planning the replacement of some non -instructional facilities. The District has purchased 20 acres (Site #81) for construction of consolidated facilities for support services functions. Transportation. Nutrition Services, Maintenance and other non -instructional functions will be housed at this centralized location. As part of the multi phase plan, the District intends to increase capacity for high school students with expansion at the Decatur High School site Increased capacity at Federal Way High and at Decatur High in later phases supplant the need for construction of a fifth comprehensive high school. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST - ADDITIONAL FACILITIES NEW FACILITY LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OFFUNDS No current plans for additional facilities. 8 U M a 0 Sg is s9 es ilI (o v, e9 g8 sn 0 o c X C 8 0 .7 C �+j 0 fig go h v � N L � i � o z O C W a a M H U M a Sg is s9 es ilI (o v, e9 g8 sn 0 o c o 0 0 .7 0 0 0 N O M � O Y N N 7 N ^ O M N p N C ^ O O M O O 0 MOM N o e� 0 O N � O C O iy '• S9 69 N � c +y o Ic M G1 N b4 69 Li O O O o O 1•M1 m C O C O O O C O In 0 0 C C / N C C N y T c 4 M °� b M O� O n V1 J r V1 D M C_ C M v CC N 44 69 69 69 49 O � C S L S9 A � `r L ^ � z _77— U. Z ✓' C4 F W O � a r � N c � j ✓ ,� zEw��i L:1 � Li ti 'Sc F rs�j U 1 F r O M v A H r 0 F �tN F" RR FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 2 - MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools (the District) has twenty-one elementary schools (grades K- 5), two schools with a K-8 grade configuration, seven middle school schools (grades 6-8). five senior high schools (grades 09-12). The Federal Way Public Academy serves students in grades 6 -10. The Internet Academy serves grades K-12 and the TAF Academy will serve students in grades 6-12. The TAF Academy serves students in the Totem Middle School service area in grades 6-12 The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school, by school type. (Harry S. Truman High School, Merit School. Internet Academy and Federal Way Public Academy serve students from throughout the District). The identified boundaries are reviewed annually. Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs that affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas. The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments In the case of most public facilities. new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School Districts are different. If the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, notjust around a single development. 11 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BOUNDARIES •C* E Federal Way Public Schools � $vuystuclent,aReader \1-- zeNm �; ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS MIDDLE SCHOOLS) ^ ' Code— ■ Code— ■ w- t i 1 Adeiatds C-6 30 81ahos E-9 l ?• ° 2 WI-doon S4 31 K8o O.8 c r , Z 3 Camelot 0.6 32 Lakota D-6 . 4 Enterprise Do 33 sacajawaa E•8 z; r 6 Groom Gahlas A-7 34 Saiihallo Com 6 Lake Doll off G•6 36 Tolom G-3 p°4" 7 Lake Grove D-6 36 Federal Way Public Academy E•S s•il�.i;r ; 3 6 Lakeland E-6 yi. r,rt S 8 Mark Twain F•4 10 MeradlthHill #4.6 SMIIORHIGH SCHOOLS 11 IpirrorLake E-6 `µ • 12 Nautilus E-5 Cod. — ■ 3 I + 13 OlymplOVlow C-7 „ 14 PenlharLahs E-0 M Decatur C-8 p ' 16 Rainier View F-18 41 Decatur Way E-6 .. 3 18 Sherwood FomsI D-8 42 Thomas Jayor3on O.4 17 StarLver Lake D-7 46 Todd Boamor E-9 18 Star take G� 49 Harry S- Truman F•6 18 Sunnyc real G-2 r.ocxa sai4 si 26 TNrmn Lakes B-0 21 valhetla G�4 ' r 22 Wlldwood F 5 Future School Sites 23 Woodmont F-3 Surplua Sltos _ 4 1 r+ y 81 Educational Service Canter F8 — 66 Malntonance-CpamOons-TrarsporlaSan E•8 — Code — ■ _ " Parise — ' • ��r+•� +.. ! 'i �•r D ro .A B FEDERAL WA V, WASHINGTON and VICINITY ''16 ` j ,",„ •� fly 1 IS pVN. Ja vfF J c•rj �v �1 .r• ai T+s 'U• 1 ar r..s rnr t 'rA•.!a '© �.'` r'r ttr,a '''. r,=� 4i 1'�`t`�t,ew � "'�' •t.. s 6 � �� r.. i�.tie�� ' y °• ter, �:. t ' r � ` moi. a rr" � or. 32 a G n U�i! _ •n � 61 Yr u 3 5 7 , ��•r � C,' /jam 7" — e a 4 W r�� i Huna�.,n.ena t � � ® s till `x ] s a rwrt.rwln.ty, a y. S`� 1 i w i, � s E _ • j '� ya errwra.+a�we.nw �T8 30 _ i ;� 4 I T ,5 ; °;a° '• ` u AReet, °CFLLMixw 1 `QO ,ri f m6„•i +`F S'� au�� YY :4 ' 1 7i i'r Federal Way Public Schools `° �` • °' ` , : ° `° EveryStudent, a Rcader • • 31''i!S.Ii- Klnp C ° 381 th ' 911:ra0 _ mw ! WLTCN Piam V na —1d” 11 — E I F G a°M H 5 7 MIDDLE SCHOOL BOUNDARIES _. Federal Way Public Schools '""' """� ""•'" e�{ `��"E` -' .a Emy SrucImr, a Rada e �w e, ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS MIDDLE SCH00L13 zsa,tn y n Code — ■ C ode — ■ ; , ; i e 1 Adelaide0-6 30 Illahoo E.8 ? ' 2 9dgadoon 04 31 Kilo , Ca4 2 s •+ " 3 Camelot G-6 32 Lakota p4 • 4 Enlarprlso D e 33 Sacalowea a .; , + 6 Omen Gables A-7 34 Saghalla 08 6 Lake Doltotf GB 35 Totem 0•3 7 take Oro" D-6 36 Fodoral Way Public Academy E-8 ' ; a Lakeland Ell • f �u pry B Mark Twain F-4 V a + " - 10 Meredith 1481 H 6 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS ' �• �� ' ; 11 Mirror Loks E4 r 12 Nautilus E-6 Code — 3 M 13 Ctymplc Vt. C-7 14 PanthorLako E4 16 Palmar Yfaw F-16 46 Decatur C 8 16 ShorwoodForost D-8 41 Federal Way era E4 17 Silver Lake 0-7 42 ThomasJotfarson 46 Todd9eamer G4 E•9 '!• 18 Star Lake 13-3 49 Harry Truman F•6 x, i t I'` n iB 8unnycroet G-2 a woaaa N` i ' h anaaiu 20 TN Lakes B4 21 Valhalla .4 22 Wlldwood F-5 Future Sct,00l Sites 23 Woodmonl F-3 Surplus Shoe — •• ,'L + • 81 Educational Service Center P4 — 86 Maintenance -Operations -Transportation E4 — Code — ■ ? ya" , r� jos i Parke — pyaT a '. 2 FEDERAL WAY. WASHINGTON and VICINITY } ' ,rift �• ' Pte- ss* �•'�� kra' �- .. 66 �c 41r `i ts7retu.,`n� QMµ ,'-, ISOs; , r ^ a ^ t • 32 a .'S`.�+` r 9 Ll >' B i� •^ �� 20 nrol,n •t "' yta ^ •' 'sw Ba'o-be� t ry rl`r a 1 aa� eam at s A ars,xx• •' ' AtjiJil%E� "'v_m IVA (\*L est1. '}—*z1 •li��G��,, ql N��/ I AMMI art >��rm ' :Sigr Iw F� HIGH SCHOOL BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools Every Studenr• i Rader m ° z 2.n11h i ..� ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS MIDDLE SCHOOLS " Coda — . Coda — 4 Adelaide 04 30 Illahoo E.9 6_ n 2 gdgadoon 84 31 Kilo t3 9 3 Camelot G-6 32 Lakote DA ] ; p° 4 Entorprlsa 0-9 33 Sacelawee E•6 6 Green Gablos A-7 34 8aghalls C-8 a �� • -] ` ` i 6 Lako DOIIOlf G-6 36 Totem G 3 °NY^ sa • ] "' " 7 Lako Greva D-0 36 Fadsral Way Public Academy E4:o.1w�I:r ; I Lakeland E9 ^ I u PLUS 9 Mark Twain F4 10 Moredltts H91 H•6 •'• ` -] �•� M,^q i a" 11 Mirror Lake E•8 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS r 12 Neutllu6 E•6 3 13 OI _ Code— ■ 14 PannttherLake £-8 a0 Decatur CS i ^ 16 RainierYlerr F•10 41 Federal Way E-6 'F ` 16 Sherwood ak Foroat 0-9 42 Thomas Jatfareon 0-4 �• ,`, Is Sllvur Lake 0.T 18 Star i.eka G"3 45 Tadd Soamer E-9 n• � `i 49 Harry S. Truman F-6 19 Sunnyctest G-1 rwopnlo 5 � j ° `n svrp sl u 20 Turin Lakes 8.8 21 Valhalla GA 22 Widwood F-6 Futuro School Sites — '•� I M4 S •.». 9 23 Woodmonl F-3 Surplus Suns — .w,a :N ^ ¢ Mg. ° • ] 91 tEA]ca0ona150rvlce Cett[ar F-6 — '°"`° ■ 96 Malntenance-Operatlons-Transport3tlon £-E — Code — ■ �f+� •„ '""" + �� • ] R fn• Parke — p ,, r •" i FEDERAL WAY. WASHINGTON and VICIIIIT , `: 1� i�fx 6 ] � • e � ; 4 , ` ] ^• Y`� : °.r r • I�s�° k w,s ..� �+' �•�`�� 0• ]a�5a ie ]; a=�� 3t' a (j�,`tei�.]•,1. kiLTCN Klnp I Pit F I 3 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities - The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast — 2009 through 2015 Capacity Summaries King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi Family Units 15 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Building_ Capacities This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. In general, the District's current target class size provides that the average class size for a standard classroom for grades K through 2 should be 20 students In grades 3-5 the target is 25 students For grades six to 12 the target class size is 26 students. Classrooms for students with Individualized Education Program (Special Education) needs are calculated at 12 seats per classroom. Using the OSPI square footage calculation as a base line, the District has calculated a program capacity for all schools. The following list clarifies the adjustments to the OSPI calculation. Music Rooms: Each elementary school requires a standard classroom for music instruction. All Day Kindergarten: Every elementary school operates at least one all day Kindergarten program. These all day Kindergarten program require additional capacity because the standard classroom is available for one all day session rather than two half day sessions. The District will operate 44 sections of all day Kindergarten in 2008/09 Special Education Resource Rooms: Each elementary and middle school requires the use of a standard classroom(s) for special education students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities English as a Second Language Programs: Each elementary, middle school and high school requires the use of a standard classroom for students learning English as a second language. Middle School Computer Labs: Each middle school has computer labs. High School Career Development and Learning Center (Resource) Room: Each high school provides special education resource room and career development classrooms for students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. 16 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITIES ELEMENTARY BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount Adelaide 349 Bri adoon 312 Camelot 234 Enterprise 443 Green Gables 474 Lake Dolloff 395 Lake Grove 324 Lakeland 377 Mark Twain 321 Meredith Hill 475 Mirror Lake 331 Nautilus 353 Olympic View 333 Panther Lake 422 Rainier View 429 Sherwood Forest 408 Siler Lake 421 Star Lake 367 Sunnvcrest 354 Twin Lakes 308 Valhalla 352 .Wild -wood 333 Woodmont 347 2008 TOTAL 8,462 Elementary Average 1 368 Notes. * Federal Way Public Academy capacity is not used in calculated average * TAF Academy capaity is not used in calculated average * Truman High School capacity is not used in calculated average 17 MIDDLE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount FTE lllahee 840 848 Kilo 858 867 Lakota 764 772 Saca awea 660 667 Sa hahe 774 782 Se uo ah 601 607 Totem 701 708 Federal Way Public Academy 200 202 2008 TOTAL 5,398 5,453 [*-N,Iiddle School Average 743 750 SENIOR HIGH BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount FTE Decatur 1316 1,393 Federal Way 1432 1,515 Thomas Jefferson 1386 1,467 Todd Beamer 1121 1,186 Truman High School 173 183 Federal Way Public Academy 133 141 2008 TOTAL 5,561 5,885 *Senior High Average 1 1,314 1 1.390 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Portable Locations The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not an efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students when increasing population impacts a school attendance area. Portables may also be required to house students when new or changing programs require additional capacity They also provide temporary housing for students until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed.. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. It is the practice and philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that portables are not acceptable as permanent facilities. The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for temporary educational facilities by Federal Vvay Public Schools. 18 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS PORTABLESLOCATED AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS PORTABLESLOCATED AT MIDDLE SCHOOLS INSTRUMONAL NON INSTRUCTIONAL Adelaide 2 1 Bri adoon 1 1 Camelot 3 I Enterprise 2 1 Green Gables 1 Lake Dolloff 1 1 Lake Grove 2 Lakeland 2 1 Mark Twain 3 5 Meredith Hill 3 Mirror Lake 3 1 Nautilus 1 Olympic View 2 Panther Lake 3 Rainier View 2 1 Sherwood Forest 4 Silver Lake 2 2 Star Lake 2 2 Sunnycrest 1 1 Twin Lakes 2 1 Valhalla 1 1 W ildwood 4 W oodmont 3 TOTAL 47 13 PORTABLESLOCATED AT MIDDLE SCHOOLS 19 PORTABLES LOCATED AT SENIOR HIGHS INSTRUCTIONAL NON IMS I RLCTIONAL Illahee 9 3 Kilo 6 1 Lakota 3 Sacajawea 4 1 Sa hahe 4 Totem 5 2 Merit 2 TAF Academv to 1 34 5 19 PORTABLES LOCATED AT SENIOR HIGHS PORTABLES LOCATED AT SL PPORT FACILITIES MOT I TDC 5 TOTAL 6 HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES Sherwood Forest 1 total I 1 INSTRI Cl 10N 4L NON LNSTRUCI IONAL Decatur 9 Federal Way 2 1 Thomas Jefferson 7 Todd Beamer 7 1 TOTAL 25 2 PORTABLES LOCATED AT SL PPORT FACILITIES MOT I TDC 5 TOTAL 6 HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES Sherwood Forest 1 total I 1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Student Forecast Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school -building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students. The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The district has used this method with vary ing years of history and weighted factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis The district collects information on birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted. A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level. The Enrollment Master TM software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment In December 2006, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District The report was complete in January 2007. The model used to forecast next year's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county -wide average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections The long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes in the -19 age group for King County. Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of 20 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN something else (e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend for the school-age population over time. The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2015. This model produces a projection that is between 23,000 and 24,000 when applied to the low, medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models. Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington. Near term projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by current local economic conditions. The District tracks new development from five permitting jurisdictions. Long range planning assumes a student yield from proposed new housing consistent with historical growth patterns Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography These projections create a vision of the school district community in the future. 21 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections Simplified FTE (K Headcount = 5 FTE, Middle School FTE= 99 Headcount, Senior High FTE = 945Headcount) Calendar Yr School Year Elementary Middle School Senior High Total K -12 FTE Perce, Chant 2003 2002-03 11,202 5,454 4,437 21,093 2004 * 2003-04 9,127 5,524 6,408 21,059 -0.2% 2005 2004-05 9,164 5,473 6,515 211152 0.4% 2006 2005-06 9,105 5,309 6,770 21.184 02% 2007 2006-07 9,022 5,261 6,754 21,037 -0.7% 2008 2007-08 8,912 5,167 6,637 20,716 -1.5% 2009 B2008-09 8,875 5,165 6,707 20.746 0.1% 2010 P2009-10 8,903 5,194 6,685 20,782 0.2% 2011 P2010-11 8,952 5,120 6,797 20,869 0.4% 2012 P2011-12 9,113 5,085 6,785 20,983 0,5% 2013 P2012-13 9,208 5,037 6,760 21,005 0,1% 2014 P2013-14 9,312 5,011 6,765 21,088 0.4% 2015 P2014-15 9,399 5,055 6,720 21,174 0.4% New Configuration Elementary K-5 Mddle School 6-8 High School 9-12 22 Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast zz,000 1 GOA 21,000 77 7-05% 20,000 c 00% o' 19,000 w z -05% � A 18,000 C o v 17,000 16,000 -1 5% 15,000 -2 0% c� Op 00 OQ �O �O TO 1-0:1- o �o �o �o c? a Q S 6 Oc OZ �0 a oc3' 00 0" 1&O& -O " School Year t=FTE Percent of Change 22 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Capacity Summaries All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and Senior High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire District. and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary. middle school, and senior high levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year. 23 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - ALL GRADES CAPACITY 20.746 Budget - - Projected - - Calendar Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2014 School Year 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY FTE CAPACITY 19,421 19,800 19,421 19,800 19 521 19.900 19,521 19.900 19,621 20.000 19,621 20,000 19,621 20,000 Add or subtract changes to capacity Increase Capacity, Lakeland Panther Lake Sunnycrest and Valhalla 2.725 100 1 2,725 100 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 19,421 19,521 L.L9 52LL 19 621 19,621 1 19 621 19,621 Adjusted Program )ATE Capacity 1900 19,900 1 19,900 1 20.000 1 20,000 12Q.000 20.000 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 20.746 20 782 20,869 20 983 21,005 21,088 21,174 Inteinet Academy Enrollment (AAFTE) 315 315 315 315 1 315 315 315 Basic TTE Enrollment vvithmt Internet Aeiitlem�' ` ' 20,431 20,467 20,554 20,668 20,690 20-773 20,859 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) 2.400 1 1 1 1 2,725 2,725 PROGRAM FTE CAPACITY (631) (567) (654) (668) (690) 1 (773) 1 (859) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY Current Portable Capacity 2.400 2,725 2,725 2.725 2,725 2,725 2,725 Deduct Portable Capacity (75) Add New Portable Capacity 400 1915$-: �` 21671 *1` 11", 5' 1,952 Adjusted Portable Capacity 2.725 1 2,725 1 2 725 1 2 725 2.725 1 2.725 1 2,725 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY OOwl��,"'"'' " 2,094 1915$-: �` 21671 *1` 11", 5' 1,952 24 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUTIL MARY - ELEMENTARI SCHOOLS CAPACITY 8,875 Budget - Projected - - Calendar Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2014 School Year 2008109 2009110 2010/11 2011112 2012/13 2013114 2014/15 BUILDING PROGRAM HEAD COUN1 CAPACITY FIhCAPACIIY 8,462 8,462 8,462 8,462 8 562 8,562 8,562 8,562 8,662 8.662 8,662 8,662 8,662 8662 l Increase Capacity, Lakeland Panther Lake SunniNcrest and Valhalla 100 100 25 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 8,462 8,562 8.562 8 662 8.662 8.662 8,662 Adjusted Program FTE Capacit} 1 8,462 8,562 8 562 8 662 8.662 8,662 &06 2 ENROLLMENT MENT Y Banc FTE Enrollment 8,875 8,903 8,952 9,113 9,208 9,312 9,399 2 Internet Academy (AAFIE) 36 36 1 36 36 36 36 36 Basic FTE Lnrollment withouC" lrt"der�t ' 8,839 8,867 8,916 9,077 9,172 9,276 9,3613 SL RPI L'S OR (t'NHO1 SE PROGRAM CAPACITY RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3 Current Portable Capacity 1,175 1 1,175 1.175 1 1,175 1,1-,75 1,175 1,175 Remove out ofsenice portables horn Wildwood and Camelot (50) 870 821 760 665 561 474 Add portable capacity to Camelot 25 Add portable ca acit to R'rldwood from Thomas Jeffers 25 Adjusted Portable Capacity 1,175 1,175 1,175 1,1,75 1,175 1,175 1,175 SITRPLUS OR (ITNHOI-SED) PROGRAM AND RELM 'LI ABLE CAP.ACI1 Y 798 870 821 760 665 561 474 NOTES: I Increase Capacity at Lakeland, Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla 2 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities 3 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporanly house students until permanent facilities are available This is a calculated number only The actual number of portables that mall be used will be based on actual student population needs The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use 25 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - MIDDLE SCHOOLS CAPACITY 5,165 74 5,091 Budget Projected - - Calendar Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2014 School Year 2008,109 2009/10 2010111 2011/12 2012/13 2 013 /14 2014/15 BLILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY FTE E CAPACITYs� 5 398 5,453 5,398 5,453 5 398 5.453 5,398 5,453 5,398 5,453 5,398 5,453 5,398 5,453 650 650 650 650 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5,398 5,398 5,398 5,398 5,398 5 398 5,398 Adjusted Program FTE Capacu- 5,453 5,453 5.-15 3 5.453 5,453 5.453 5,453 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 1 Internet Academy (AAFTE) Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 5,165 74 5,091 5,194 74 5 120 5,120 74 1 5,046 1 5.085 74 5.011 5,037 74 4,963 5,011 74 4,937 5,055 74 4 981 Add/Subtract portable capacity SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) GROGRAM CAPACITY 1 307 1 278 1 352 1 387 1 435 1 461 417 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 2 Current Portable Capacity 606 650 650 6-50 650 650 650 Add/Subtract portable capacity Add new portable capacity TAF Academy 50 Adjlitsted`Pt iil` k Capacity { ` ~ ` 650 650 650 650 650 650 650 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE , CAPACITY NOTES: I Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use 26 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS CAPACITY 6 707 Budget -- Prglected - - Calendar Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 201.1 School Year 2008109 2009110 2010/11 2011/12 2012113 2013/14 2014/15 BUILDING PICOGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY ATE CAPACITY � I� . ,, , . � 5,561 5.885 5,561 5,885 5.561 5,885 5,561 5,885 5,561 5,885- 5,561 5,885 5,561 5,885 Add or subtract changes in capacity Adjusted Portable Capacity � � 900 9ti0 966 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5,561 5,561 5,561 5,561 5 561 5,561 5,561 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 5.885 5 885 1 5 885 5,885 5 885 5.885 5,885 FNR01 1 MENT Y Basic FTE Enrollment 6 707 6,685 6,797 6,785 6,760 6,765 6,720 I Internet Academy (AAFTE) 205 205 1 205 205 1 205 1 205 1 205 Basic Ed without Internet Academy 6,502 6,480 6,592 X6.580 6,455 6,560 6,515 SURP1 US OR (UNHOUSED) 625 1 1 900 -� PROGRAM CAPACITY (941) 1 (919) (1,031) (11019) (994) (999 (95<t} RF. LOCATABLE CAPACITY 2 Current Portable Capacity 625 900 900 900 900 900 900 Subtract portable capacity - move to Wlldwood (25) = t 3. CAPACITY (4i) (19) Add portable capacity at TJ 100 (94) (99) (54� Add portable capacity at TAF Academy 200 Adjusted Portable Capacity � � 900 9ti0 966 900 900 900 1 000 SURPLUS OR (LNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE I 1 = t 3. CAPACITY (4i) (19) (13 1) (11.9) (94) (99) (54� NOTES: 1 Internet Academy students are Included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities 2. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available This is a calculated number only The actual number of portables that well be used will be based on actual student population needs The District may begin to pull portables from the Instructional Imentory Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use 3. Capacity for unhoused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and no planning time in some classrooms Puget Sound Early College will house approximately 60 of the unhoused students 27 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN King County, the City of Federal WE, and the City of Kent Impact Fee Calculations Single and Multi -Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substantially adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi -family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that district. - STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single-family units and multi -family units. The factors used in the 2007 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single-family units that were constructed in the last five (5) years. - IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Following the calculations for the student generation factor is a copy of the Impact Fee Calculation for single family and multi -family units based on King County Code 21A and the Growth Management Act. ➢ Temporary Facility Cost is the average cost of a portable purchased within the last 12 months. Plan Year 2009 Plan Year 2004 Single Family Units 54,017 $3,883 Multi -Family Units $1,733 $ 1,b47 28 wl S 7 PEP E C L f9 61 0 O 0 (O O M ti C N O O h O 00 M 7 O r r N to O j i r` U') 00 O ti O M n N LL O o 0 o r 0 r 0 0 0 C. r = 4) O N (O M �O O N O) O V t0 N r r V N N N M Cl) N C LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D 0 0 0 O 61 U) O O .r 0c (flu)mrn(Or- ti 0 v r V y o "7 lf7 O r� 0 V 00r-- Ln O N (O Lo NI� O) N O m w O jV r- r O N N N r 0 r a LL O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 O a mC C O O M O [O 00 M O M O co Ln 00 CO M (O V� r- r N N V M a3 - LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O W O o N L = r Q) .� N N M N N N O O N O= m 6) Cq z fA O w a t Y V C r- O 17, 1 r M M E) C O � � z d CO O M M ti M iS) O N r- E E m M r N� r r V M r r N 3 N N z Q N C L G C,ro aU 0000a00000(D y Z C) a O � � L tp C (u R 00 (O CD N 0 LO co r- M V NN d ' co Z C (n o c zz o z 2 > _ d a (Da� Y = O c m O om o tm -1O o C9 W CC a y9 �e y c �o O~ c a LU o o L m cn v (� � 'O 111 J O Y w @ o z5 ) Z2C0 Cl 0 C. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE School Site Acquisition Cost: Student Student Facility Cost/ Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary Middle School Sr High School Construction Cost: % Perm Fac,, Facility Facility Total So Ft Cost Capacity Elementary Middle School Sr High Student Student Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ SFR MFR SFR MFR 9681%1 $9 100,000 1 200 03285 0 1631 02446 0 1222 00621 00942 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 TO I AL $0 $0 School Construction Cost: % Perm Fac,, Facility Facility Total So Ft Cost Capacity Elementary Middle School Sr High Student Student Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ SFR MFR SFR MFR 9681%1 $9 100,000 1 200 0 3285 0 1631 0--24-4-6- 0 1222 00621 _ 0 0942 $14470 $5,383 50 $0 $O $0 TOT4L $14,470 $5,383 Temporary Facility Cost: % Temp Fac Facility Facility Total Sq Ft Cost Size Elementary Middle School Sr High Student Student Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ CFR &4FR SFR IvFFR 3 19% 3 19% 3 19% $168 307 25 0 32851. 0 1631 02446 0 1222 0 0621 0 0942 $0 $o $0 $0 S53 $20 TOTAL S53 520 State Matching Credit Calculation. Area Cost Sq Ft State Allowance/Sq Ft Student Match Elementary Middle School New Sr High Student Student Factor Factor Cost/ Cost! SFR MFR SFR MFR $168 79 $168 79 $168 79 90 - 6184% 0 3285 0 1631 02446 01222 0 0621 0 0942 $3 086 $1,148 $0 $0 SO $0 Total 53,086 $1,148 Tax Payment Credit Calculation Average Assessed Value (March 2008) Capital Bond Interest Rate (March 2008) Net Present Value of Average Dwelling Years Amortized Property Tax Levy Rate Present Value of Revenue Stream SFR MER $297,242 568,998 5 11°ro 5 11% $2,283,012 $529,950 10 10___ $ l 49 $149 53,402 5790 30 Single Family Multi -Family Residences Residences Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost $ - $ - Permanent Facility Cost $ 14,470 $ 5,383 Temporary Facility Cost $ 53 $ 20 State Match Credit $ (3,086) $ (1,148) Tax Payment Credit $ (3,402) $ (790) Sub -Total S 8,035 S 3,465 50% Local Share $ 4 017 $ 1,733 Im act Fee S 4.017 5 1,733 30 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The 2009 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document, based on the 2008 Capital Facilities Plan. The changes between the 2008 Plan and the 2009 Plan are listed below. SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN The Six Year Fiance Plan has been rolled forward to reflect 2009/2015 SECTION III - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION CAPACITY Elementary school capacity reflects program changes for the 2008/09 school year. Elementary capacity includes space for All Day Kindergarten programs at every elementary school. Changes to the Building Program Capacities calculation are found on page 17. PORTABLES The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page 19 STUDENT FORECAST The Student Forecast now covers 2009 through 2015 Enrollment history and projections are found on page 22. CAPACITY SUMMARY The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 24-27. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY CODE 21A The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors. The adjustment made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 2008 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2009 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page 31. 31 FEDERAL WAIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2008 TO 2009 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in student Generation factors between the 2008 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2009Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age of the developments and the year placed in the survey. The Student Generation worksheet is found on page 29. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COSTS The anticipated cost for replacing Lakeland, Panther Lake. Sunnycrest and Valhalla is $70,000,000. The replacement will add 50 new seats to the school capacity at each building The total capacity at these four elementary schools is currently 1505. Adding 200 additional seats will increase the capacity by 13%. Total Cost .13 X $70,000,000 = $9,100,000 The District will use the above formula created as a base from the 2008 Capital Facilities Plan for the 2009 Capital Facilities Plan. The capacity of the four elementary schools may vary from year to year as programs are added or changed and construction cost may increase over time For instance for each new all day Kindergarten program, the building capacity will effectively be reduced by 20 headcount and the Board authorized an increase in construction cost of $lm for Valhalla. These changes would increase the construction cost. The District is using the base formula established in the 2008 plan in the Impact Fee calculation. 32 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2008 TO 2009 IMPACT FEE Item From/To Percent of Permanent Facilities 96.21 % to 96.81 % Percent Temporary Facilities Average Cost of Portable Classroom Area Cost Allowance State Match Average Assessed Value Capital Bond Interest Rate Property Tax Levy Rate Single Family Student Yield Elementary Middle School High School Multi -Family Student Yield Elementary Middle School High School 3.79% to 3.19% $128,982 to $168,307 $162.43 to $168.79 61.90% to 61.84% SFR — $262848 to $297,242 MFR — $63,234 to $68,998 4.08% to 5.11% $1.27 to S1,49 .3462 to .3285 .2186 to .1631 .2418 to .2446 .1129 to .1222 .0575 to .0621 .0842 to .0942 33 Comment Report #3 OSPI Updated portable inventory Updated average of portables purchased and placed in 2007 Change effective Julyl, 2008 Change effective July 2007 Per Puget Sound Educational Service District (ESD 12 1) Market Rate King County Treasury Division Updated Housing Inventory Updated Housing Inventory DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Issued with a 14 Day comment and appeals period Description of Proposal: This threshold determination analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the following actions, which are so closely related to each other that they are in effect a single action: 1. The adoption of the Federal Way Public Schools' 2009 Six Year Capital Facilities Plan by the Federal Way Public Schools for the purposes of planning for the facilities needs of the District. 2. The amendment of the King County Comprehensive Plan by King County to include the Federal Way Public Schools' 2009 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the King County Comprehensive Plan. 3. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Federal Way, City of Kent and the City of Auburn to include the Federal Way Public Schools' 2009 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the City of Federal Way's, City of Kent's and the City of Auburn's Comprehensive Plan. This proposal may also involve the amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Des Moines to incorporate the Federal Way Public Schools' 2009 Capital Facilities Plan into the Capital Facilities Element of the City of Des Moines' Comprehensive Plan. Proponent: Federal Way Public Schools Location of the Proposal: The Federal Way Public Schools District includes an area of approximately 35 square miles. Areas of the cities of Federal Way, Kent. Des Moines and Auburn fall within the District's boundaries, as do parts of unincorporated King County Lead Agency: Federal Way Public Schools is the lead agency pursuant to WAC 197-11-926. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse environmental impact on the environment An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 21C 030(2)(c). This decision was made after a review of the completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public upon request. This Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issue. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., April 30, 2008. The responsible official will reconsider the DNS based on timely comments and may retain, modify, or, if significant adverse impacts are likely, withdraw the DNS. If the DNS is retained, it will be final after the expiration of the comment deadline Responsible Official: Ms. Geri Walker Enrollment and Demographic Analyst Federal Way Public Schools Telephone: (253) 945-2071 Address. 31405 18th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 You may appeal this determination in writing by 5:00 p.m.. April 30, 2008 to Geri Walker, Federal Way Public Schools, 31405 18th Avenue South. Federal Way, WA 98003. Date of Issue: April 16. 2008 Date Published: April 16, 2008 S 'PermitTlan�COMPPLAN AMENDMENTS'1008'CPA-1008.4_ SchlDrsmmsCapFacPlansUpdaaes,CPA•1008-1 DNS_FedRaySchU);sLdoe 01 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAC 197-11-960 Environmental Checklist. Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning. shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply" In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for nonproject actions (part D) For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer." and "affected geographic area," respectively 2 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND Name of proposed project, if applicable: The adoption of a Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan by the Federal Way School District No. 210 for the purposes of planning for the District's facilities needs. The King County, City of Federal Way. City of Kent and the City of Auburn's Comprehensive Plan will be amended to include the District's 2009 Capital Facilities Pian in the Capital Facilities Plan Element. This project may also involve the amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the city of Des Moines to incorporate the District's 2009 Capital Facilities Plan 2. Name of applicant. Federal Way School District No. 210. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Federal Way School District No. 210 31405 18th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 Contact Person: Ms. Geri Walker Enrollment and Boundary Analyst Telephone: (253) 945-2071 4. Date checklist prepared: April 16, 2008 5. Agency requesting checklist: Federal Way School District No 210 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The Federal Way School District's 2009 Capital Facilities Plan is scheduled to be adopted by the District in May 2008. The Capital Facilities Plan will be forwarded to King County, the City of Federal Way, City of Kent and the City of Auburn for inclusion in each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. It will also be forwarded to the city of Des Moines for possible inclusion in this jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plans. The District will continue to update the Capital Facilities Plan annually. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project -specific environmental review. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The Capital Facilities Plan sets forth the capital improvement projects that the District plans to implement over the next six years. These include construction of four elementary schools, Lakeland, Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla. This plan also includes construction of Lakota Middle School. Additionally the plan covers the purchase and siting of temporary facilities at various locations Non -instructional projects included in the plan will consolidate support services operations at a single location. This will include the construction of new facilities to house the Transportation, Maintenance and Nutrition Services departments. Current plans are for all the projects to be complete by 2013. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will undergo additional environmental review, when appropriate, as they are developed. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain Permits will be applied for with the appropriate jurisdiction for siting the temporary facilities and for the construction of Panther Lake and Valhalla Elementary Schools during the 2008 calendar year. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. The District anticipates that King County, the City of Federal Way, the City of Kent and the city of Auburn will adopt this Capital Facilities Plan into their Comprehensive Plan. The city of Des Moines may also adopt this Capital Facilities Plan into the Capital Facilities Elements of their Comprehensive Plans (when issued). 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) This is a non -project action. This proposal involves the adoption of the Federal Way School District's 2009 Capital Facilities Plan for the purpose of planning the District's facilities needs. The District's Capital Facilities Plan will be incorporated into King County's, the City Federal Way's, the City of Kent's and the City of Auburn's Comprehensive Plans. It may also be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plans of the city of Des Moines The projects included in the Capital Facilities Pian have been or will be subject to project -specific environmental review. A copy of the Capital Facilities Plan may be viewed at the District's offices. 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section. township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist The Capital Facilities Plan will affect the Federal Way School District. The District includes an area of approximately 35 square miles. The City of Federal Way, parts of the cities of Kent, Des Moines and Auburn, parts of unincorporated King County, fall within the District's boundaries. A detailed map of the District's boundaries can be viewed at the District's offices. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The Federal Way School District is comprised of a variety of topographic land forms and gradients Specific topographic characteristics of the sites at which the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan are located have been or will be identified during project -level environmental review when appropriate. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Specific slope characteristics at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project -level environmental review. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand. gravel. peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils. specify them and note any prime farmland. Specific soil types found at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project -level environmental review when appropriate. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Unstable soils may exist within the Federal Way School District. Specific soil limitations on individual project sites have been or will be identified at the time of project -level environmental review when appropriate. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject, when appropriate, to project -specific environmental review and local approval at the time of proposal. Proposed grading projects. as well as the purpose, type, quantity, and source of any fill materials to be used have been or will be identified at that time. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. It is possible that erosion could occur as a result of the construction projects currently proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan The erosion impacts of the individual projects have been or will be evaluated on a site-specific basis at the time of project -specific environmental review when appropriate. Individual projects have been or will be subject to local approval processes. 2 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings?) The proposed renovation projects will require the construction of impervious surfaces. The extent of any impervious cover constructed will vary with each capital facilities project included in the Capital Facilities Plan. This issue has been or will be addressed during project - specific environmental review when appropriate. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: The erosion potential of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and appropriate control measures have been or will be addressed during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. Relevant erosion reduction and control requirements will be met. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.. dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the protect is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known Various emissions, many construction -related, may result from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan The air-quality impacts of each project have been or will be evaluated during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: The individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project -specific environmental review when appropriate and relevant local approval processes. The District will be required to comply with all applicable air regulations and air permit requirements Proposed measures specific to the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions 7 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is a network of surface water bodies within the Federal Way School District. The surface water bodies that are in the immediate vicinity of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. When necessary, the surface water regimes and flow patterns have been or will be researched and incorporated into the designs of the individual projects. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require work near the surface waters located within the Federal Way School District. Applicable local approval requirements have been or will be satisfied. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Information with respect to the placement or removal of fill and dredge material as a component of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Any surface water withdrawals or diversions required in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project - specific environmental review when appropriate. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Each project included in the Capital Facilities Plan, if located in a floodplain area, will be required to meet applicable local regulations for flood areas. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? if so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. 8 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Specific information regarding the discharge of waste materials that may be required as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions b. Ground: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description. purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may impact groundwater resources. The impact of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on groundwater resources has been or will be addressed during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources. if any (for example Domestic sewage; industrial. containing the following chemicals .. , agricultural, etc ). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. The discharges of waste material that may take place in connection with the projects included in the Plan have been or will be addressed during project -specific environmental review. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may have storm water runoff consequences Specific information regarding the storm water impacts of each project has been or will be provided during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local storm water regulations. 9 ENVIRONNIENTAL CHECKLIST 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may result in the discharge of waste materials into ground or surface waters. The specific impacts of each project on ground and surface waters have been or will be identified during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to all applicable regulations regarding the discharge of waste materials into ground and surface waters Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Specific measures to reduce or control runoff impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. 4. Plants: a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree- alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree- fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation A variety of vegetative zones are located within the Federal Way School District. Inventories of the vegetation located on the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require the removal or alteration of vegetation The specific impacts on vegetation of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. The specific impacts to these species from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. 10 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plans, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Measures to preserve or enhance vegetation at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local landscaping requirements. 5. Animals: a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds- hawk. heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: An inventory of species that have been observed on or near the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Inventories of threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on migration routes have been or will be addressed during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Appropriate measures to preserve or enhance wildlife have been or will be determined during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. 11 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing. etc. The State Board of Education requires the completion of a life cycle cost analysis of all heating, lighting, and insulation systems before it will permit specific school projects to proceed. The energy needs of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined at the time of specific engineering and site design planning when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on the solar potential of adjacent projects have been or will be addressed during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Energy conservation measures proposed in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be considered during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. 7. Environmental Health: a. Are there any environmental health hazards. including exposure to toxic chemicals. risk of fire and explosion. spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will comply with all current codes, standards, rules, and regulations. Individual projects have been or will be subject to project -specific environmental review and local approval at the time they are developed when appropriate 12 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)`' A variety of noises from traffic, construction. residential, commercial and industrial areas exists within the Federal Way School District. The specific noise sources that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The District does not anticipate that the projects will create long-term increases in traffic - related or operations -related noise levels. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The projected noise impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated and mitigated during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. Land and Shoreline Use: a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? There are a variety of land uses within the Federal Way School District, including residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, utility, open space, recreational, etc. b. Has the site been used for agriculture9 If so, describe. The project sites covered under the Capital Facilities Plan have not been used recently for agriculture. c. Describe any structures on the site. The structures located on the proposed sites for the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified and described during project -specific environmental review when appropriate 13 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? The remodeling and renovation projects will require the demolishment of school structures. The structures that will be demolished as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The sites that are covered under the Capital Facilities Plan have a variety of zoning classifications under the applicable zoning codes. Site-specific zoning information has been or will be identified during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Inventories of the comprehensive plan designations for the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be completed during project -specific environmental review when appropriate g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Shoreline master program designations of the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project -specific environmental review when appropriate h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify Any environmentally sensitive areas located on the sites of the projects included in the Plan have been or will be identified during project -specific environmental review. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The Federal Way School District currently serves approximately 22,400 students. The student population is expected to increase to 24,000 by the year 2013. The District employs approximately 3,100 people. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Any displacement of people caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be evaluated during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. However, it is not anticipated that the Capital Facilities Plan, or any of the projects contained therein, will displace any people. 14 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to project -specific environmental review and local approval when appropriate Proposed mitigating measures will be proposed at that time, if necessary. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The compatibility of the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan with existing uses and plans has been or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive planning process and during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. 9. Housing: a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any" Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. No housing units would be provided in connection with the completion of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. It is not anticipated that the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will eliminate any housing units The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on existing housing have been or will be evaluated during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Measures to reduce or control any housing impacts caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. 10. Aesthetics: a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. 15 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined during project -specific environmental review when appropriate c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Appropriate measures to reduce or control the aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined on a project -specific basis when appropriate. 11. Light and Glare: a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project -specific environmental review. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Off-site sources of light or glare that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Proposed measures to mitigate light and glare impacts have been or will be addressed during project -specific env ironmental review when appropriate. 12. Recreation: a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are a variety of formal and informal recreational facilities within the Federal Way School District. 16 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. The recreational impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, including proposed renovated school and support facilities, may enhance recreational opportunities and uses. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Adverse recreational effects of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to mitigation during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. A school site usually provides recreational facilities to the community in the form of play fields and gymnasiums. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. There are no known places or objects listed on, or proposed for such registers on the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The existence of historic and cultural resources on or next to the sites has been or will be addressed in more detail during project -specific environmental review when appropriate b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. An inventory of historical sites at or near the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed on a project -specific basis when appropriate. 14. Transportation: a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system Show on site plans. if any. The impact on public streets and highways of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be addressed during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. 17 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not. what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The relationship between the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and public transit has been or will be addressed during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? An inventory of parking spaces located at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and the impacts of specific projects on parking availability has been or will be conducted during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The need for new streets or roads, or improvements to existing streets and roads has been or will be addressed during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Use of water, rail, or air transportation has been or will be addressed during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The traffic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The mitigation of traffic impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be addressed during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. 15. Public Services: a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The District does not anticipate that the projects identified in the Capital Facilities Plan will substantially increase the need for other public services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 18 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Remodeled/renovated school or facilities will be built with automatic security systems, fire alarms, smoke alarms, heat sensors, and sprinkler systems 16. Utilities: a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system. other. Electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone. and sanitary sewer utilities are available at the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan. The types of utilities available at specific project sites have been or will be addressed in more detail during project - specific environmental review when appropriate. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed Utility revisions and construction needs have been or will be identified during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature; Date Submitted: April 16, 2008 M ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal. would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented Respond briefly and in general terms 1 How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage. or release of toxic or hazardous substances. or production of'noise? To the extent the Capital Facilities Plan makes it more likely that school facilities will be constructed and/or renovated and remodeled, some of these environmental impacts will be more likely Additional impermeable surfaces, such as roofs. parking lots, sidewalks, access roads, and playgrounds could increase storm water runoff, which could enter surface or ground waters Heating systems, emergency generators, and other school equipment that is installed pursuant to the Capital Facilities Plan could result in air emissions The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan should not require the production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances, with the possible exception of the storage of diesel fuel or gasoline for emergency generating equipment. The District does not anticipate a significant increase in the production of noise from its facilities, although the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will increase the District's student capacities Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Proposed measures to mitigate any such increases described above have been or will be addressed during project -specific environmental review when appropriate Storm water detention and runoff will meet applicable County and/or City requirements and may be subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permitting requirements Discharges to air will meet applicable air pollution control requirements. Fuel oil will be stored in accordance with local and state requirements. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The Capital Facilities Plan itself will have no impact on these elements of the environment. These impacts have been or will be addressed in more detail during project -specific environmental review when appropriate. The projects included in the Plan are not likely to generate severe impacts on fish or marine life. 20 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Specific measures to protect and conserve plants, animals, and fish cannot be identified at this time. Specific mitigation proposals have been or will be identified, however during project - specific environmental review when appropriate. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The construction of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will require the consumption of energy. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be constructed in accordance with applicable energy efficiency standards. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection, such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The Capital Facilities Plan and individual projects contained therein should have no impact on these resources. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed during project -specific environmental review when appropriate, Updates of this Plan will be coordinated with King County and the cities of Federal Way Kent, Des Moines, and Auburn as part of the Growth Management Act process, one of the purposes of which is to protect environmentally sensitive areas To the extent. the District's facilities planning process is part of the overall growth management planning process, these resources are more likely to be protected. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The Capital Facilities Plan will not have any impact on land or shoreline use that is incompatible with existing comprehensive plans, land use codes, or shoreline management plans. The District does not anticipate that the Capital Facilities Plan or the projects contained therein will directly affect land and shoreline uses in the area served by the District. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: No measures to avoid or reduce land use impacts resulting from the Capital Facilities Plan or the projects contained therein are proposed at this time. 21 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The projects included to the Capital Facilities Plan may create temporary increases in the District's need for public services and utilities. Upon the completion of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, however, the District does not anticipate that its need for public services and utilities will increase substantially beyond existing levels Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: No measures to reduce or respond to such demands are proposed at this time. 7. Identify. if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the ens ironment. The Capital Facilities Plan will not conflict with any laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. S Tema FfanICOMP_PLAN_AMENDMEM 312008ICPA-2008-4_SehlDtsmeJsCapFacPlansUpdales'CPA-1008•J_ENV-AdWaySehQsl doe 22 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT IL AVENUE TO EXCELLENCE June 24, 2008 Charlene Anderson City of Kent 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032-5895 Dear Ms. Anderson, Enclosed you will find a copy of the Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan for 2008 through 2014. The Plan has been prepared and adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors on April 28, 2008, in conformance with the Growth Management statutes of the State of Washington, Included in the Plan are the following: a Six -Year Enrollment Projections ❑ Auburn School District Standard of Service ❑ The District's overall capacity of the 6 -year period ❑ An inventory of existing facilities ❑ Impact Fee Computations ❑ District Capital Construction Plan The Auburn School District Board of Directors is requesting the plan be adopted by reference as part of the capital facilities element of the City of Kent's Comprehensive Plan and that the school impact fees be set in accordance with the plan for the 2009 fiscal year. The Auburn School District is also requesting an increase in the fees for 2009. The. calculated fee for single-family is $5374.64, an increase of $13.60; and the calculated fee for multi -family is $877.02, an increase of $411.24. Please advise if additional information is required or needed. Thank you for your assistance. Copy to: Linda Cowan, Superintendent, Auburn School District w/o enclosure Denise Stiffarm, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP wlo enclosure Jeff Grose, Executive Director of Capital Projects w/o enclosure 915 Fourth Street NE; Auburn, WA 980024452 (253) 931-4930 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 f Arthur Jacobsen Elementary School - Opened September 2007 Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors April 28, 2008 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 408 915 Fourth Street NE Auburn, Washington 98002 (253) 931-4900 Serving Students in Unincorporated King County City of Auburn City of Algona City of Kent City of Pacific BOARD of DIRECTORS Craig Schumaker Janice Nelson Ray Vefik Lisa Conners Carol Helgerson Linda S Cowan. Superintendent AUBURN SCIIOOL DISTRICT "Avenue to Excellence" Table of Contents Section I Executive Summary ... Page 1 Section 11 Enrollment Projections .... .. Page 6 Section III Standard of Service........... Page 8 Section IV Inventory of Facilities ....... Page 15 Section V Section VI Section VII Pupil Capacity Capital Construction Plan . . . Page 18 Page 21 Impact Fees. Page 24 Section VIII Appendices .................................. Page 28 Appendix A 1 - Student Enrollment Projections Page 29 Appendix A 2 - Capital Facilities Plan Projections Page 43 Appendix A 3 - Student Generation Survey Page 48 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 Executive Summary This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Auburn School District (the `'District") as the District's principal planning document. in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2008 This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District's needs The District may prepare interim and periodic long-range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period; other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and within the City of Auburn and City of Kent; the King County Council, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction's respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of Algona and Pacific, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act and the local ordinances, the Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly The Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the District's specific needs In general, the District's current standard provides that class size for grades K-2 should not exceed 25 students: class size for grades 3-4 should not exceed 27 students, class size for grade 5 should not exceed 30 students. When averaged over the six elementary grades, this computes to 26 5 students per classroom. Class size for grades 6-12 should not exceed 30 students. with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers. (See Section III for more specific information.) 2 The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The District's 2007-08 capacity was 13,743 whereas Full Time Equivalent ("FTE") enrollment for this same period was 13,847 16 (includes Full Day Kindergarten) The actual number of individual students was 14.559 as of October 1, 2007. (See Section V for more specific information.) The capital construction plan shown in Section VI addresses the additions to the District's existing facilities. This provided for a new high school approved by the voters in February 2003 and opened in September 2005; and the addition of two new elementary schools approved by the voters in February 2005; with Lakeland Hills Elementary opening in the Fall of 2006 and Arthur Jacobsen Elementary opening in the Fall of 2007. The plan includes the construction of a new middle school, as well as the acquisition of a future school sites to accommodate growth. The new facilities are required to meet the projected student population increase to be generated from the large development areas within the Auburn School District. Three areas that have significant impact on the school district are the Lakeland South, the Lea Hill, and the north Auburn valley areas of the district. There are other pockets of development that impact the District as well. The City of Kent has an area of approximately 158 acres that was sold to developers in 2004. The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the fiscal impact incurred by a District experiencing growth and development Section VII sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multi -family dwelling units. The student generation factors have been generated using the students who actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and multi -family developments constructed in the last five years. The method of collecting the data is with the use of GIS mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County GIS; and to integrate the mapping with student data from the district's student data system This method gives the District actual student generation numbers for each grade span for identified developments This data is contained in Appendix A.3. Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CHANGES FROM 2007 TO 2008 Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2007 Capital Facilities Plan that are a part of the 2008 Plan The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference Section I Executive Summary A Updated to reflect new information within the Plan B Summary level list of changes from previous year Section II Enrollment Projections Updated projections See Appendices A 1 & A 2 Section III Standard of Service A Increase in Adaptive Behavior program required 2 additional classrooms at the elementary level B Reduction of 1 structure learning program classroom at elementary level C Increase of 2 early childhood classrooms at elementary level D Reduction of 1 second grade TOSA program at elementary level E Increase of 7 full day kindergarten classrooms at elementary level F. Reduction of 2 English as second language classrooms at high school level G Increase of 2 classrooms for 18-21 year old Transition program at high school level H Reduction of 2 special education resource rooms at high school level Section IV Inventory of Facilities Updated to include portables at Mt Baker Middle School for Fall of 2008 Section V Pupil Capacity Updated to include portables at Mt Baker Middle School for Fall of 2008 4 Aubum School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Section VII Impact Fees CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2007 to 2008 DATA ELEMENTS CPF 2007 CPF 2008 EXPLANATION Student Generation Factors Single Family Consistentwith King County Ordinance 11621, Elementary 03120 0 3370 Student Generation Factors are calculated Mid School 0 1270 0 1450 by the school district based on district Sr High 0 1610 0 1780 records of average actual student generation Multi -Family rates for new developments constructed Elementary 00460 00650 over the last five years Mid School 00190 00290 Sr High 00340 00390 School Construction Costs Elementary $21,500,000 $21,750,000 Updated project estimated costs Middle School $42,000,000 $42,500 000 Updated protect estimated costs Site Aquistion Costs Cost per acre $228,269 $272 387 Updated estimates on iand costs Boeckh Index $15422 $16843 Updated to protected SPI schedule (G Beck) Match % - State 58 11% 5932% Updated to current SPI schedule Match % - District 41 89% 4068% Computed District Average AV Single Family $257,404 $290,617 Updated from January 2008 King County Dept of Assessments data Multi -Family $69,427 $78,574 Updated from January 2008 Kirg County Dept of Assessments data using weighted average Debt Sery Tax Rate $214 $1 79 Current Fiscal Year GO Bond Int Rate 408% 5 11 % Current Rate (Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-08) Section VIII Appendices Appendix A 1 - Updated enrollment protections from October 1. 2007 Appendix A 2 - Updates enrollment protections with anticipated buildout schedule Appendix A 3 - Student Generation Survey March 2008 Aubum School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS The Auburn School District uses a modified cohort survival model to project future enrollment for all of the District's operations Table II 1 is an extract from the comprehensive projection model found in Appendix A 2 titled "CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections" This Table shows the anticipated enrollment for the next six years based on the previous 13 year history of the District under the assumptions set forth in the comprehensive projections, Appendix A 1, and the projection for additional students generated from new developments in the district as shown in Appendix A 2 TABLE ASD ENROLLMENT 2008-2009 11.1 PROJECTIONS March 2008 2011-2012 2012-2013 ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 KDG 996 1011 1032 1057 1082 1099 1115 1 995 1065 1086 1112 1138 1155 1172 2 1019 1018 1093 1119 1145 1163 1180 3 997 1049 1054 1134 1160 1178 1195 4 1057 1024 1082 1092 1173 1190 1208 5 1078 1087 1060 1124 1134 1207 1225 K-5 6142 6255 6407 6638 6832 6991 7094 6 1007 1103 1118 1097 1161 1163 1235 7 1057 1035 1137 1158 1137 1192 1193 8 1033 1081 1065 1173 1194 1164 1219 6-8 3097 3220 3320 3428 3492 3518 3647 9 1337 1350 1410 1408 1523 1539 1514 10 1368 1280 1299 1364 1359 1461 1475 11 1352 1287 1203 1224 1285 1266 1365 12 1263 1276 1215 1134 1153 1202 1181 9-12 5320 5192 5126 5129 5320 5468 5534 TOTALS 14559 14667 14853 15195 15645 15977 16276 GRADES K-12 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 K-5 w/K @ 1/2 5644 5750 5891 6110 6292 6442 6536 6-8 3097 3220 3320 3428 3492 3518 3647 9-12 5320 5192 5126 5129 5320 5468 5534 K-12 w/K @ 112 14061 14162 14338 14667 15104 15428 15718 Note The district is currently operating Full Day Kindergarten in seven schools and will have two state funded Full Day Kindergarten at two additional elementary schools Auburn School Distnct No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 STANDARD OF SERVICE The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Aubum and the City of Kent indicate that each school district must establish a "Standard of Service" in order to ascertain the overall capacity to house its projected student population The Supenntendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage "capacity" guidelines for computing state funding support The fundamental purpose of the SPI guidelines is to provide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching funds for school construction projects By default these guidelines have been used to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population The SP1 guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, facility configurations, emerging educational reform, or the dynamics of each student's educational program The Auburn School District Standard of Service addresses those local considerations that require space in excess of the SPI guidelines The effect on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation pattern Conditions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without accompanying computations OVERVIEW The Auburn School District operates fourteen elementary schools housing 6,033 students in grades K through 5 The 670 of the 995 Kindergarten students attend 1/2 days throughout the year Grades 1 through 5, plus 325 kindergartners, attend on a full day basis When converted to a full time equivalence the K-5 enrollment is 5,807 Four middle schools house 3,200 students in grades 6 through 8 The District operates three comprehensive senior high schools and one alternative high school housing 5,320 students in grades 9 through 12 The District opened the fourth high school in the fall of 2005 CLASS SIZE The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the student population Class sizes are subject to collective bargaining Changes to class size agreements can have significant impact on available space The current pupil/teacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 26 5 students per teacher Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 26 5 students per room at grades K - 5 At grades 6 - 12 the limit is set at 30 pupils per room The SPI space allocation for each grade articulation level, less the computed reduction for the Auburn School District Standard of Service, determines the District's capacity to house protected pupil populations These reductions are shown below by grade articulation level ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate to severe disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses ten classrooms to provide for 105 students The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPI space guidelines No loss of capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to total elementary population ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR The Auburn School District operates an adaptive behavior program for students with behavior disabilities at the elementary school level The program uses two classrooms to provide for 20 students The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space allocations by two classrooms Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 26 5 each = (53) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (53) Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAIN 2008 through 2014 STANDARD OF SERVICE SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities Seventeen standard classrooms are required to house this program The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space guidelines by ten standard classrooms The loss of capacity Is expected as growth in program Is larger than the total elementary population Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 26 5 each = (265) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (265) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the elementary level One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 26 5 each = (27) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (27) HEAD START The Auburn School District operates a Head Start program for approximately 125 youngsters in six sections of 1/2 day in length The program is housed at three elementary schools and utilizes three standard elementary classrooms and auxiliary office space The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 26 5 each = (80) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (80) EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a pre-school program for young children with disabilities below age five This program is housed at eight different elementary schools and currently uses nine standard classrooms The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 9 rooms @ 26 5 each = (239) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (239) READING LABS The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional language arts instruction These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces if available in each elementary school Four elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available, thus they are housed in a standard classroom The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 26 5 each = (106) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (106) 10 Aubum School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 STANDARD OF SERVICE MUSIC ROOMS The district elementary music programs require one acoustically modified classroom at each elementary school for music instruction The housing requirements are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 26 5 each = (371) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (371) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the elementary school level for students learning English as a second language This program requires fourteen standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 26,5 each = (371) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (371) SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for seven highly impacted elementary schools This pullout model provides direct Instruction to students who are not at grade level and do not receive other services This program requires seven standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 26 5 each = (186) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (186) ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a learning specialist program to Increase literacy skills for first and second graders This program model has been created from the 1-728 funds and currently has the specialist going Into existing teacher classrooms as well as pulling out students Into designated classrooms The district is utilizing classrooms at all fourteen elementary schools Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 26 5 each = (371) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (371) FULL DAYKINDERGARTEN The Auburn School District provides Full -Day Kindergarten programs to increase academic skills for kindergarten students This program model has been created from tuition, 1-728 funds and currently has two schools receiving state funding for 2008-09 school year The district is utilizing fifteen classrooms at nine of the fourteen elementary schools Housing requirements exceed the OSPI space guidelines for this program by seven classrooms Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 26 5 each = (186) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (186) 11 Aubum School Distnct No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 STANDARD OF SERVICE MIDDLE SCHOOLS SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific disabilities Nine classrooms are required at the middle level to provide for approximately 300 students The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the SPI space guidelines ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District provides a transition program for students with moderate to severe disabilities The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses one classroom The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space allocations STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates four structured learning classrooms at the middle school level for students with moderate to severe disabilities and one developmentally disabled classroom for students with profound disabilities Two of the five classrooms for this program are provided for in the SPI space allocations Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 26 5 each = (80) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (80) MIDDLE SCHOOL COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates a minimum of one computer lab at each middle school This program utilizes a standard classroom per middle school The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for students learning English as a second language This program requires four standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes elective options in special interest areas Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations SPI Report #3 dated 1!22!08 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the mid-level facilities The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each = (240) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (240) 12 Auburn School Distnct No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 STANDARD OF SERVICE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS SENIOR HIGH COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates two computer labs at each of the senior high schools This program utilizes two standard classrooms at comprehensive high schools and one at West Auburn The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 30 each = (210) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (210) ENGLISH ASA SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at three comprehensive high schools for students learning English as a second language This program requires three standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 30 each = (90) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (90) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates four structured learning center classrooms for 40 students with moderate to severe disabilities The housing requirements for this program are providec for in the SPI space guidelines TRANSITION PROGRAM FOR 18-21 YEAR OLD The Auburn School District operates a transition program for 18-21 year old students with moderate to severe disabilities Two classrooms are utilized for this program that connects students to the community and work The housing requirements for this program are not provided fcr in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 30 each = (60) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (60) SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities The current senior high school program requires eleven classrooms to provide for approximately 370 students The SPI space guidelines provide for one of the eleven teaching stations Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 30 each = (300) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (300) PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center The SPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity This space was not intended for nor is it usable for classroom instruction It was constructed to provide a community center for the performing arts Using SPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet computes to 208 unhoused students or 8 33 classrooms Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 33 rooms @ 30 each = (250) 13 Aubum School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 STANDARD OF SERVICE ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that Includes numerous elective options in special interest areas Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage The district averages 950h utilization of all available teaching stations SPI Report #3 dated 1122/08 Identifies 148 teaching stations available In the senior high facilities The utilization pattern results In a loss of approximately 10 teaching stations Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 30 each = (300) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (300) STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS ELEMENTARY Loss of Permanent Capacity = (2,253) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (2,253) MIDDLE SCHOOL Loss of Permanent Capacity = (560) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (560) SENIOR HIGH Loss of Permanent Capacity Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,210) TOTAL Loss of Permanent Capacity = (4,022) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (4,022) 14 Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES Table IV.1 shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OSPI rated capacities Table IV 2 shows the number and location of each portable unit by school The district uses relocatable facilities to. 1 provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting. 2, make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique student needs, and 3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on existing physical plants Core facilities (i e gymnasiums. restrooms. kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc ) are not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable classrooms. Table Permanent Facilities IV 1 n OSPI Rated Capacity (January 2008) District School Facilities Building Ca aci Acres Address Elements Schools Washington Elementary 492 540 20 E Street Northeast, Auburn WA 98002 Terminal Park Eternentary 401 670 1101 D Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Dick Scobee Elementary 550 1050 1031 14th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Pioneer Elements 415 830 2301 M Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Chinook Elementary 485 8 75 3502 Auburn Way South, Auburn WA, 98092 Lea Hill Elementary 459 1000 30908 124th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Gildo Rey Elernentga 531 1000 1005 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Evergreen Heights Elem 456 809 5602 South 316th, Auburn WA, 98001 Al ac Elementary 494 1060 310 Milwaukee Boulevard North, Pacific WA, 98047 Lake View Elementary 595 1640 16401 Southeast 318th Street, Auburn WA, 98092 Hazelwood Elementary 578 1267 11815 Southeast 304th Street, Auburn WA, 98092 Ilalko Elementary 585 1200 301 Oravetz Place Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Lakeland Hills Elementary 585* 1200 1020 Evergreen Way SE, Auburn WA,98092 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 585* 1000 29205 132" Street SE, Aubum, WA 98092 ELEM CAPACITY 7211 Middle Schools Cascade Middle School 836 1730 1015 24th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Ol m is Middle School 898 1740 1825 K Street. Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Rainier Middle School 849 2633 30620 116th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Mt Baker Middle School 845 30 88 620 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 MS CAPACITY 3,428 Senior High Schools West Aubum High School 231 5 10 401 West Main Street, Auburn WA, 98001 Auburn Senior High 2,261 1860 800 Fourth Street Northeast, Auburn W A, 98002 Auburn Riverside HS 1,388 3300 501 Oravetz Road, Auburn WA, 98092 Auburn Mountainview HS 1,431 4000 28900 124` Ave SE, Auburn, WA 98092 SH CAPACITY 5,311 TOTAL CAPACITY 15,950 *Estimated - Not included in January 2008 OSPI Report 16 Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES TABLE TEMPORARYfRELOCATABLE 2008-09 IV 2 FACILITIES INVENTORY 2011-12 2012-13 (March 2008) Cascade Elementary Location 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 1 2013-14 Wasn ngton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Terminal Park 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Dick Scobee 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Pioneer 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Chinook 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Lea Hill 5 5 2 2 2 2 2 Gildo Rey 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Evergreen Heights 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 Alpac 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Lake View 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Hazelwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ilalko 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Lakeland Hills Elementary 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 30 30 31 31 31 31 31 TOTAL CAPACITY 795 795 822 822 822 822 822 Middle School Location 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Cascade 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 Olvmo+c 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 Rainer 5 5 5 8 8 8 8 Mt Baker 4 6 6 8 8 8 8 TOTAL UNITS 9 11 11 18 20 20 20 TOTAL CAPACITY 270 330 330 540 600 600 600 Sr High School Location 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 West Auburn 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 Auburn 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Auburn Riverside 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 Auburn Mountainview 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 25 25 25 26 26 26 26 TOTAL CAPACITY 750 750 750 780 780 780 780 COMBINED TOTAL UNITS 64 1 16 1 67 75 77 77 77 COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY I 1 815 1,875 1,902 I 2,142 I 2,202 I 2,202 2,202 17 1/ 3/ 2 Aubum School Distnct No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 PUPIL CAPACITY While the Auburn School District uses the SPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from which to determine space needs, the District's educational program requires more space than that provided for under the formula This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in Section III, Standard of Service The District's capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional space to house its programs Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new unfunded facilities The combined effect of these adjustments is shown on Line B in Tables V 1 and V 2 below Table V 1 shows the Distict's capacity with relocatable units included and Table V 2 without these units Table V.1 I Capacity WITH relocatables 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 A SPI Capacity 15,365 15,950 15,950 15,950 15,950 16,750 16,750 A 1 SPI Capacity -New Ele 585 585 585 A 2 SPI Capacity- New MS SPI Capacity- New MS 800 800 B Capacity Adjustments (2,207) (2,147) 2,120) (1,880) (1,820) (1,820) (1,820) 13,743 13,803 13,830 14,070 14,930 14,930 15,515 C Net Capacity D ASD Enrollment 14,559 14,667 14,853 15,195 15,645 15,977 16,276 E ASD Surplus/Deficit (816) (864) (1,024) (1,125) (715) (1,048) (761) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS ADJUSTMENTS Include Relocatable 1,815 1,875 1,902 2,142 2,202 2,202 2,202 4,022) Exclude SOS (p 14 (4,022) (4,022) (4,022) (4,022) (4,022) (4,022) (4,022 Total Adjustments (2,207) (2,147) (2,120) (1,880) (1,820) (1,820) (1,820) R 3f 2/ Table V.2 Capacity 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 WITHOUT relocatables A SPI Capacity 15,365 15,950 15,950 15,950 15,950 16,750 16,750 A 1 SPI Capacity -New Ele 585 585 A 2 SPI Capacity- New MS 800 B Capacity Adjustments 4,022) 4,022 4,022) 4,022 4,022) 4,022 (4 022) 11,928 11,928 11,928 11,928 12,728 12,728 13,313 C Net Capacity D ASD Enrollment 14,559 14,667 14,853 15,195 15,645 15,977 16,276 E ASD Surplus/Deficit (2,631) (2,739) (2,925) (3,267) (2,916) (3,249) (2,963) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Exclude SOS (pg 14) 4,022) 4,022) (4,022) (4,022) (4,022 (4,022) 4,022) Total Adjustments (4,022) (4,022) (4,022) (4,022) (4,022) (4,022) (4,022) 1/ New facilities shown in 2011-12 are not funded under the current Capital Facilities Plan 2/ The Standard of Service represents 25 38% of SPI capacity When new facilities are added the Standard of Service computations are decreased to 23 35% of SPI capacity 3/ Students beyond the capacty are accomodated in other spaces (commons, library, theater, shared teaching space) 19 PERMANENT FACILITIES SPI Rated Capacity (March 2008) Giomcnfani .^ter-hnnlc Aubum School Distnct No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 PUPIL CAPACITY Building 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Washingtcn 492 492 492 492 492 492 492 Terminal Park 401 401 401 401 401 401 4C1i Dick Scobee 550 550 550 550 550 550 550 Pioneer 415 415 415 415 415 415 415 Chinook 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 Lea HIII 459 459 459 459 459 459 459 Glldo Rey 531 531 531 531 531 531 531 Ever Heichts y 456 456 456 456 456 456 456 Alpac 494 494 494 494 494 494 494 Lake View 595 595 595 595 595 595 595 Hazelwood 578 578 578 578 578 578 578 Ilalko 585 585 585 585 585 585 585 Lakeland Hills 585 585 585 585 585 585 585 Arthur Jacobsen 585 585 585 585 585 585 585 Elementary #15 585 ELEM CAPACITY 7 211 7.211 7,211 7,211 71211 7:211 7,796 Mi(IdIP. SchnnIs Building 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Cascade 836 836 836 836 836 836 836 Olympic 898 898 898 898 898 898 858 Rainier 849 849 849 849 849 849 849 Mt Baker 845 845 845 845 845 845 845 Middle School #5 0 0 G. 01 8001 800 800 MS CAPACITY 3,428 1 3,428 3,428 1 3 428 1 4,228 1 4,228 1 4,228 Senior Hiah Schools Building 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 1 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 West Auburn 231 231 231 231 231 231 23' Auburn 2,261 2,261 2,261 2,261 2.261 2,261 2,261 Auburn Riverside 11388 1,388 1,388 1,388 1.388 1,388 1,388 Auburn Mour:tainview 1,431 1,431 1,431 1,431 1,431 1,431 1,431 SH CAPACITY 5.311 5,311 1 5,311 5,311 5,311 5;311 5,311 COMBINED CAPACITY 1 15,950 1 15,950 1 15,950 1 15,950 1 16,750 1 16,750 1 17,335 20 Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974 with the formation of a community wide citizens committee The result of this committee's work was published in the document titled 'Guidelines for Development' In 1985 the Board formed a second Ad Hoc citizens committee to pick up from the work of the first and address the needs of the District for subsequent years The work of this committee was published in the document titled 'Directions for the Nineties ' In 1995 the Board commissioned a third Ad Hoc citizens committee to make recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and physical facilities The committee recommendations are published in the document titled Education Into The Twenry-First Century - - A Community Involved ' The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop plans for the implementation, funding, and deployment of technology throughout the District's programs The 1996 Bond proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate technological applications The 1998 Capital Levy provided funding to further deploy technology at a level sufficient to support program requirements in every classroom and department In 2005 a replacement technology levy was approved to continue to support technology across all facets of the District s teaching, learning and operations In addition to the technology needs of the District the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District must prepare for continued student enrollment growth As stated in their report, "the District must pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible " The Ad Hoc recommendation included commentary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent rates of assessment A proposition was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that provided $8,000,000 over six years to address some of the technology needs of the District, and $5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire school sites During the 1997-98 school year a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Dieringer School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population from an area that includes a large development known as Lakeland South Lakeland South at that time was immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the Auburn School District On June 16 1998 the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Dieringer Boards of Directors On June 22, 1998 the Auburn School Board adopted Resolution No 933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation On June 23, 1998 the Dieringer School Board adopted a companion Resolution No 24-97-98 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from Dieringer to Auburn containing most of the Lakeland South development and certain other undeveloped properties Development in this area is progressing at an aggressive rate In April of 2002, the Board formed a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two items and make recommendations to the board in the Fall of 2002 a A review of the conclusion and recommendations of 1985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees related to accommodating high school enrollment growth This included the review of possible financing plans for new facilities b. Develop recommendations for accommodating high school enrollment growth for the next 10 years if a new senior high school is not built This committee recommended the board place the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in February 2003. The February election approved the new high school at 68 71% yes votes The school opened in the Fall of 2005. In the Fall of 2003 the school board directed the administration to begin the planning and design for Elementary 913 and Elementary #14 In the Fall of 2004, the Auburn School Board passed Resolution No 1054 to place on the ballot in February 2005 two elementary schools The voters approved the ballot measure in February of 2005 at 64 72% Lakeland Hills Elementary (Elementary #13) opened in the Fall of 2006 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary (Elementary #14) is located in the Lea Hill area on a 10 acre site and opened in the Fall of 2007 These two elementary schools were built to accommodate the housing growth in Lakeland Hills and Lea Hill areas of the school district. 22 Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2414 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN In the 2004-05 school year, the Board convened a sixth Citizen's Ad Hoc committee to agam study and make recommendations about the future impacts in the District One of the areas of study was the need for New Facilities and Modernization The committee made a number of recommendations including school size, the need for a new middle school, and to begin a capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities based upon criterion During the 2005-06 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Kent School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population that will come from an area that includes a number of projected developments in the north Auburn valley On May 17, 2006 the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Kent Boards of Directors On June 14, 2006 the Kent School Board adopted Resolution No 1225 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation On June 26, 2006 the Auburn School Board adopted a companion Resolution No 1073 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from the Kent School District to the Auburn School District effective September 29, 2006 The Distnct is projecting 1717 additional students within the six year period including the Lakeland, Lea Hill, and north Auburn valley areas This increase in student population will require the acquisition of new middle school and new elementary school sites and construction of a middle school and elementary school during the six year window Based upon the District's capacity data and enrollment projections, as well as the student generation data included in Appendix A 3, the District has determined that approximately eighty-six percent of the capacity improvements are necessary to serve the students generated from new development, with the remaining additional capacity required to address existing need The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population and passage of bond issues 2008-14 Capital Construction Plan March 2008 Projected Fund Project Timelines Project Funded Cost Source 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 All Facilities - 2006 Technology Yes S12,000.000 6 Year XX XX XX XX Modernization Cap Levy Impact Portables Yes $1,200,000 Fees XX XX XX XX XX XX XX Property Purchase Impact New Middle School Yes $7,000,000 Fees XX XX New Elementary Yes $3,500,000 State Mat XX XX XX Bond XX Arthur Jacobsen Elem Yes $21,500,000 impact Fee open Bond XX XX XX XX Middle School #5 No $42,500,000 Im act Feeplan const const open Bond XX XX XX Elementary#15 No $21,750,000 Im act Fee plan I const open 1/ These funds may be secured through local bond issues, sale of real property, impact fees, and state matching funds The District currently is not eligible for state assistance at the elementary school level 23 N O E o a a E0 0 0 � 4 O J Ln M a (o N M 1 rn fa LL M CL O O O O O 0 `B o Lcon o Ln O O O O O C O ty O La La ?en L LL L sFr cs3 to y � N L � C a a m c C tos °a C a C O C .a 0 0 0 O E O C O O C C O O P LL N^ t.7 O ry LL V LL� U =4 co r- Ln co � CN M r r ti OC C) M O O O c0 C 07 0 0 0 C m M C O O O C U O C U) Q ;n c a $ v N O cr Li CW LU J V C o a o C O O x o o o O O a LL a C R W O O 2 0 0 0 Q y Q q E 0 0 a N � o 0 0 = CO y , _T x QU O O Ll Imo► 3 a Q V u @= O ? y T W QL n l C O N Q O � = y N 0 O N O LT V R L7 LL N a X Z? LLId m n W � 4 �Q U ~ x =c,r� v o o U " F- U) W LL — y o o 0 0 Z ' ..+ O = N 2 Y x w U () U 2 n_ F- Uca 3- LL V> N H 1 to O f0 fR s w to LL N O E o a a E0 0 0 m R LL Ln M a (o N M 1 rn fa LL M r. O O O O O 0 `B o Lcon o Ln O O O O O C 9� w ty O La La LL L sFr cs3 to IL ^m � C O C Q7 O C tos M mN 1� Oi OJ N M �o v� N LL N h LL�- UO 7 O M U y OO N a1 N 0 mbq fA uS 4? O M N UJ � U? � Cn cn s4 El-} Ef3 N 0 0 0 E o a a E0 0 0 m R LL Ln M a (o N M m LL e a M z N M fa LL Lf) o 0 <o N co O O O O O O 0 O ^ O O C O O O O O O O C = (6 O La La LL L IL ^m C C O C Q7 O C C a C O C .a 0 0 0 O E O C O O O C C O O P LL N^ t.7 O ry LL V LL� LC: x O LL r- Ln co � M M r r ti OC C) M O O O c0 C 07 0 0 0 C m M C O O O C 7 v C_ O C U) ;n LL LL O LL O cr Li CW LU J V C o a o C O O W W Q () � o o o O O a LL N N N C R W O O 2 0 0 0 N fa M M co q E 0 0 a o 0 0 = LO41) o y , W ~ x U m LL -L- 0 l y _ N LL O o Ln _ nOj 0 0 M M C d .�. O N O LT U N a7 co LL Lo O L7 LL N N V) .M- Z? j W LL ~ x ~ x llJ N o o F- U� F- U) W LL — y o o 0 0 Z ' ..+ O = N Ln Y x a m cn a U () U W 4 X co oo cc i- L(7 b9 Uca 3- LL V> N H m to O f0 fR s N O N U3 ff3 � m� L)2, �� _ u n La Q L6 N Y L L O ftl O c y t0 Y L L a<n to y a = cn a = Q o d LL w cG Cn LL w Cn y l w N a E m LLL U x Q1 M a H c Z Lo r CO r (:J o W 00 u7 n N O O— p o f N 1] T � X U} O CO to 7 N 13 p V�, co 1� IC t* !/} g LL o z W z LLI N LL H _n 7 x CL V o o cs =tea H a a �o V- U a a = r e^ 0 U p O J c a c �_ c u� to r- v o t .► U 4s tq m j N 6 m C � Ce) N Ch ER m M T t-- E 29 c �a ¢a n�i .ml.. ss x O 40 y c w V U U c c O cn Cil a cm � IL LLU N c a� cm is c c . N p o y c fu U ° c U E y z � = li W W � m U) d F N FM a c m 2 x jm F v� tt> e 0 a U W m V E c z W m $ 41 a) ? to LQL LL o O y y OU 9 Coo C D > O O y a Q Q U3 O -a m 5 cn c a W a a �: � a 0. x TT LL LL W W> LL - U 3 c W o> j E ii XE c D CA U- H LL m N Lo r CO r (:J Lo N C N W 00 u7 n N O O— p T � X U} O CO to 7 N 13 p V�, co 1� IC t* !/} g LL N W W LL H Q CL H z W 0 LO o C)cn r- v o t .► Q, N O to 4)7+ Ce) N Ch ER m M T t-- E 29 c CTS n�i .ml.. ss ra O 40 y c w U U c c O Cil IL LLU N c a� cm is o O U . N p o y 5 U ° c U E y z � = li W W � m U) d F N FM LWL Lwi L L 2 m N Z co J IL z LU J o Q LL - U) � E a 7 D Qa a U 00 � U !n U M O O 4 n U 69 s Q M (T N t0 a CD C LO Q N LD M 669 aR aD CD N m r- a " � N U C3] C N N a O N N N U � tf3 6g O N L R O O O } N O IL OOIO r M {} L N Cn n O LO M tNC] O r- a.R o N 00 el V N Lc O e 2 O' M N � N M c0 C M o0 M CD 10 r r In rn o N N n n m M 'm'n 64 in y9 69Ln r r J D p O O co co N CO � o o Me o r- e Q3 a LL Ocj� N pC. M M L N O N O .0 N C0 Or M a O O co O N N N N N n p 10 co r ~ O N N r M 69 LLOa 603, 6q�n 1 41 h9 r to r M Ln Cl) e4 e u CO -I0 Q1 0 E Lo Cn 6 Ln to O O r nj N) N t0 O O M cA C7 CD Ln r W Y O N N h ti M p On C v> b3 N !f3 44 r r �= 60 L 00 N co ti s M e e r o 2 r LOO M C4 'T N M N CD O M W CltMO O o (n O O r N r ~ O M M fi3 E9 r r 115 Q U CO Ln O co M O co LO V n O° `'r CA a LL LU U)03 -oO O p M NC', N c') Cl CD O tp N A7 O O M CO fD O P r O a0 N N O th in '7 CA v3 C7 z V i� 69 'LO L` O M Cl) q~ O 3� sF N co O O o O i Cl)O m Ln Ln O 03 N r N Cl) N O O O pp Q1 co co O O r N C, M p m CD V N CH L7 1 N 64 Vi r r fR 69. L N c R C09 a o O o co w li l0 N m O O N D C t0 Cn m r U Cb ry+ R z w O C N R i- F- m E x 7 N N D �M�p� @ N Y C a D O N O a G W J U ° LL 6� u r o m R Co L O y y oN C N y O L 6 LL O Z 3 a C a, a E ` N Q t0] N L 7 y " E O O �-0 a) N O ° >^ LLL m R E O C m O ni=� N L m 0 w R G> G L) Q W -RO Ln 'RO CD a L) m c w m m m M c° E° a Q 4 LL 0 ¢ G O C N U O C CCc m O W LL ttl 7 R m 'O [1 01 m Lb R N U R R O C O CL O y} CO) ° L?N a E V)J 0 (U L m 3 m G7 t5 m w? t5 Y N ti y p_ y M O D a m R a' w a a a O 3 Ln E LL a y ,5O Q d f0 Q O 4 O R O U) C!) U) 0 V w C C Ol U) �_ Q fn Q LLJ c�`0 Q C7 O a CI) O Q CA a ��O•• 3 al O U) CO (o a O O O O LL LL Li U O 7 O Q U CL R U 4 O O M U U R -,=oX .R. y x G O U ° R LL LL I m Cf) > W O N LL C O. E LL r d O O R R m LL LL i.e. G LL a Q U a tq a f- o 0 U)��. Q (� m c 3 3 E E g g; E E �° ° R N O O m in z z m F- m cn <n 0 0 O c a i— i— a o a O R U) co O 00 � U !n U M O O 4 n U 69 s Q M (T N t0 a CD C LO Q N LD M 669 aR aD CD N m r- a " � N U C3] C N N a O N N N U � tf3 6g O N L R O O O } N O IL OOIO r M {} Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2008 through 2014 Section VIII Appendix Appendix A 1 - Student Enrollment Projections Appendix A 2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections Appendix A 3 - Student Generation Survey Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Auburn School District 4408 Student Enrollment Projections October 2007 Introduction The prolective techniques give some consideration to historical and current data as a basis for forecasting the future. In addition, the `projector' must make certain assumptions about the operant variables within the data being used These assumptions are `judgmental" by definition Forecasting can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future, or from the known to the unknown The attached tabular data reviews the history of student enrollment, sets out some quantitative assumptions, and provides projections based on these numerical factors The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, psychological, economic, and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection The logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today, and will be m the future It further moderates the impact of singular factors by average ng data over thirteen years and six years respectively The results provide a trend, which reflects along (13 -year) and a short (6 -year) base from which to extrapolate Two methods of estimating the number of kindergarten students have been used. The first uses the average increase or decrease over the past 13 and 6 -year time frame and adds it to each succeeding year The second derives what the average percentage Auburn kindergartners have been of the live births in King County for the past 5 years and uses this to project the subsequent four years. The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact. This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections Monitoring deviation is critical to the viability and credibility of the projections derived by these techniques Tables Table I — Thirteen Year Historg_of October 1 Enrollments — page 32 The data shown in this table is the baseline information used to project future enrollment. This data shows the past record of enrollment in the district on October I of each year Table 2 — Historical Factors Used in Pro ections - page 33 This table shows the three basic factors derived from the data in Table 1. These factors have been used in the subsequent projections. The three factors are 1. Factor 1 — Average Pupil Change Between Grade Levels This factor is sometimes referred to as the "holding power" or "cohort survival." It is a measure of the number of pupils gained or lost as they move from one grade level to the next 2. Factor 2 - Average Pupil Change by Grade Level This factor is the average change at each grade level over the 13 or 6 -year period 3. Factor 3 — Auburn School District Kindergarten Enrollment as a Function of King Countv Live Births. This factor calculates what percent each kindergarten class was of the King County live births in the 5 previous years From this information has been extrapolated the kindergarten pupils expected for the next 4 years. 30 Table 3 — Pro ection Models — pages 34-42 This set of tables utilizes the above mentioned variables and generates several projections The models are explained briefly below ❑ Table 3 13 (pg 34) — shows a projection based on the 13 -year average gain in kindergarten (Factor 2) and the 13 -year average change between grade levels (Factor 1). The data is shown for the district as a whole. ❑ Table 3.6 (pg 34) — shows a projection using the same scheme as Table 3.13 except it shortens the historical to only the most recent 6 years ❑ Table 3 13A and 3 6A (pg 35) — uses the same factors above except Factor 3 is substituted for Factor 2 The kindergarten rates are derived from the King County live births instead of the average gain ❑ Tables 3E.13, 3E.6, 3E.13A, 3E.6A (pg 36) — breaks out the K-5 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Tables 3MS 13, 3MS 6, 3MS.13A, 3MS 6A (pg 37) — breaks out the 6-8 grades from the district projection Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation ❑ Tables 3SH.13, 3SH 6, 3SH.13A, 3SH 6A (pg 38) —breaks out the 9-12 grades from the district projection Summary level data is provided for percentage gam and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Table 4 (pg 39) — Collects the four projection models by grade group for ease of comparison. ❑ Table 5 (pgs 40-42) — shows how well each projection model performed when compared with actual enrollments Data is provided in both number and percent formats for the past 13 years. Summary Historically, average gain in students over the past 6 years is 132% annually that equates to 183 students Over the past 13 years the average gain is 1 55% and equates to 204 students annually. Using the cohort survival models that data below is a summary of the range of variation between the four models This data can be used for planning for future needs of the district The models show changes in the next six years ■ Elementary level shows increase ranging from 325 to 725 (page 36) * Middle School level shows increase ranging from 211 to 362 (page 37) ■ Hi(yh School level shows decreases ranging from -169 to -308 (page 38) The models show these changes looking forward thirteen years. ■ Elementary level shows increase ranging from 462 to 1489 (page 36) ■ Middle School level shows increase ranging from 371 to 800. (page 37) ■ High School level ranges from -3 to gain of 413 (page 38) This data does not factor new developments that are currently under construction or in the planning stages Projected enrollment data with new developments is found in Appendix A 2 Development data is combined with enrollment projections from this report 31 lt! 7 m O co N I� M m li7 I, h u') 1� O M M ti M O7 N m m LO N O o m CI) 0 N M o rn� V n O O p O 0 0 0 0 0 m cq co It r r N M a � O o p V co 1�of C N N O y) 00 N N O N f- O Ln N 1-- O [V 7 C p r N M C) CD m m N o V CD M N O p lO M M d C) (0 O N nm m m m lo m n C1 C) m O O O O �2 r N 7 LO N N co N O_ p M+ O a N � N T 0 n v m M N Ln r 'rO .,] N N m C0 � N N � C0 CO lC) � � N O T CO N CO � m'n m I� CO O N Lf) CD r r ma) N N (D M N 6 O Lij O � r --j Q N CO m r M W) CD m m W W _O CC �t O m N M C O N o L(] N a N C m a COi 67 Or r ? r r P r c7 O @ O N Q r e a M p _ L7 O G co CND � N N C M I" M N o y M Q) 4) c N CJ O O O O O N C r C) T N O G � 7 Q Q N p CO m CA m m m I- 7 Lo M C V CD m M �Y 10 N O T N O O O O m 6i 6i W rn M M N T O N M M r O p M N C N rn u7 m 0 Lo M a fO C) r r 07 M O O O r a o � � T > p O'i M N M •F r M u] Lx) N 0 T N W O C Q Q Lh C) N O ti c0 CD M� m O n NLn 6�i N E o f� `o C O co x M C) O m m m C) m r r C1 N M t- c W -r: (J a o d 7 M N cO n M m m LOO 7 tOfY r m N r (�D O Q7 o m N M m m E tO q 4) Q) o Q Q mM m O O I- m a Q7 M� CO m I- C) mM O O 7 -t m N 2 to O 0) Q: O m O Q7 C) C) c0 co N N M C] :d m 6i 1n m 6'i m O M m h r m M m 1� M M N C0 (O m CO N r N t � c, rn rn a) rn c, rn rn m o mf- m m cv C � L ~ � C LLI J fO W O Q C7 O r N< Q r N M M CD 1- m W r J O C _ a Q C Y p a 0 p N N O m C C14 � u7 O 0 N N Cl) O) O O O O I M T O M m r M tO m M N M �O M in M lO N 0 V m O O O M Q) O) m lO N 00 CO O N (D Oh co u) co M ON M CO co r CO t11 m M LO't N CO m N co co m M MLO Lo co O N h m N't u7 CO N M Cf) M N 0 Lo 11 M V) GS n 7 (D r CC) Lnm O O n n m 00 m N N t- CC N N t.') (c N R Lo M N co v Cl) N M� O3 W W) m C14 m m W LO CO CO N O N Lf cmD N It LO M N M a M toeD t-� co 00 m 0 It 00 O 7 LO O O O N CO Cfl N V CO M N M V M M to m to C1 O I- O C) co O O CD 0 O N N CO m N <n fD M N co V M m d N M 7 N �Ofi m M =m 0 r m t� m m co O O O N M O N U -) (DN a m N Cl) Cl) " O LO M N O= r- m O N N Go co m 00 O O m 0) Q) N O N L7 m M Lo m N M I:r M N n (M tl- M CO O c4 It Ln C+ N M CA N m V to 0) LO v a0 O m m h O O CA m c0 O N O N CO m M -T LO N M It M 07 X m O n O M O M CD r- iA 00 0 r O M N M o rn� o rn rn m ca o a 00 y C C M CO m Cl) a LO N M N O C M C) CD m m N C) M M N O m M C) r- t- LL] M LO 0 m r- O mV r m 0103 m n C1 rn O N m N 7 LO N N co N O_ O 0 n v m M CO N m Ln r Q) CO q) O) N m O r O u7 MO N CO � m'n m I� CO O N Lf) CD (D t, to N Q Lo r ma) N N (D M N 6 Lij r --j Q N CO m r M W) CD m m W CC 07 X m O n O M W J QN F z u Ut M pp O z F A` d to J T 0 CIO 0 Q 0 O W Q o e o 0 0 0 o a a o 0 0 o a o o e e a o a e o 0 o e e o 0 0 0 o O) m O1 m H.�. M N i� Ln Co m CD N 7 O CO 10 O CD m Q) O M C77 M M OL >` W V• CD m h v N f` co co (L a O ❑ J Z W❑ M Ln m M Q) Ln Ln N V' h 00 N 0) m O Ln Q) CD � M QS N m m h h m t, m Lo V• N m Ln h m N M (D M Ln N M m m O c0 07 O h h r r O N N W) O N v N cn Y W M M V V' V• Q �' �' 7 V' V• V- M M M a M M M M v't V' v d' V• Q Q Q Q o O O N O L j C O J O V 0- d a- (L 3 FZ p �_ Q Q W v v v v Q m W co J W > J J ❑ W N m co m 0 W m (D to N M O h M M O O h '•f M m V O N CD to N N Ln Co g r r N C L COD C.D fD Lm�7 cc COO h n W r m Cho m 407 m m C) 0) a) Qh7 .0 O ONS M M m OCA CC) q7 M Or LZj,I Y W a z o N Q U O = r- U) (;i W 2 co Ln (77 c0 r h Ln Om c0 O m h O M N V• N 00 CO M M 07 M h N M Ln h e- Ln N LO V• N CD N CO h N N h u7 V' O O N N r 0) to N CD Lo r h Ih N N N t- N M V V' Ln N O O M O 'c N h h h W N v v m Ln V' CCS m M Q7 O h 0 N co m (C7 ccccCD O M r O Ll r 0P-�. CO 0 ❑ (� Z zm Q J h V' M M C) M"i -,i 6 6 t - m m O O m r V' (D V• O N v N N N N" N N N M r r r r r r r r r .- r r r r r r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Y a Q F l) J O=1�: h on Oi O N M V• CO CO h m O O N M V• 0 M h Cc O O N M 7 Lo O h O 0 O r N h a0 m�o m E `O o0 se se W 47 z z T T 07 6) 67 QS QS O O O O O O O O O O r= i rY Z W O W O h m QS 0 N M V' Ln m h m O ON M v Lo c L- W m O N M Lo O r m O O r 0 F -p} Z Cr h h h 00 co m m m m m m m cl m 07 0 0 0 m m C) Q 0 S M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r F L O J Z O❑ rn = CA O M M m M h v N CO 0 0 0 c0 Ln M O r Lo m O h M cM O Ln Y CO l0 OS a0 h O O h h co m m Q) M O O O h h N a 0 O r N O m W V• M W O M 0 CO o7 h co c0 O" M (f) v Ln at v h N m O Lo CO h N r M Ln CO Co O Lo O m c0 V M c) r N co v N N Vr m to O co L(7 V' V' j 7 Li m Ln LC) &Co CO m CO n h m m h CO h ti m r r ti ti t-- h ti h t` t` cO -' Ci Q r m O N O � m Ln a 2 F Z ❑ h h V' CO O O Lo O Ln N co M OQ�S M h O N m Y r m LL7 Cb O N Ln O m a) h V• W C� O O m v m O O N O M O) h m a0 h O M O h Q) h Ln (O N (D O QS m(n O O N d_ M (O r 0'} N O O Oct r C`') O0 CD CD M p ccCD CA Ln Ln (7 N r r a N L LT O r r N N N M C+i Lfi st h h C'o 7 Co •f 7 4 4 •t u7 Ln O N m r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r J a U CD O Q) O M O N (o V• O O r M V• m M V' (D O O O O O Ln M to N h h Z M N O M W 2 F ti N M v O v tD O 0) N O O r M h h Ln O M h O CO M N O h O m h 0 M O 00 V Lo V h V It Ln h O co to m r m m 4Y h 0 m O Ln h h O M O O Ln M O J m Q7 m M M 4- C") M V Ln CO (O h m c0 c0 m O N u) O N o N N Ln N N N N N N V r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O U J Q Q O r N M V' LA 0 h 00 0 O N M M V 0 (D h w O 0 Y N M V 0 CD h h h h h h h h r I. -m tO w m CO m m m m O O) 0 0 0 W CA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M O Q❑ W M O O M O O QS QI O O W q7 O O 07 Q7 O O) O7 O Q) O O O7 CA O7 O QI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W U Z} r r r r r N N N N N N N r U LU W J QN F C M M N m L1 0 0 0 0 0 NIOi(D V'Im pp o 0 0 CIO 0 OF 0 O Fla o m Q7 r r CD r M O CD V• N O� N O O N O V• >+ CA O O M M V' m O! Y r (n M IN CD L y .0 to r N N MN Y N N O N v h -- O ccW N cc i� Q Y r N M v Ln CO M `-' O r N U Q W co O N O � m ZA N CD a U N 3 r N M 7 (Ci O h 00 M O r r� L C=L LL 0 � w r U CL � a O Lo N O y l pt O Y r N M v Ln m h 00 O r l r 0 C C C N M - N c0 M h 4 i: - 9 O d (EM cm c M N N N m O O Lo N m Ln Ln I O N W fh N LC7 o m m (DEn Lo Ln O h h Vr d' In O h N r V Lo O O d m Ch N N o v N W O O N > (y WLo W r C Q Q J m O Q' O N l N OS U N Q W y v ECJ rO r LL } 0 U r r N M V to is n OD W O O y (p M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Y a U O L Ylr N M S Lnm h OD O LL E ... C M M N m L1 0 0 0 0 0 NIOi(D V'Im 0 N a It 0 N 0 a 7 m 0 m 0 O 0 O m Q7 r r CD r M O h r N N m (D N N W N J Op (n m N cc i� Q Y r N M v Ln CO h CO es O r N W co CO � ZA N CD G CT C � O L � U r U CL � a O Lo N O lh Lo M N M 0 O N O O o p N 0 Ln r N M m M h 0 V' LL7 O d (EM M N N O'N m h M N M 0 Ln > O O W r N M V' d• d Q>a =o !b N Ln O Q' N OS U N Q W rO r LL } U E M co O LL w C M M N m L1 co N O cM V' O O O M V O o O N M w O r M u7 D zm co 0'0 N N W' 0 0 0 0 r r 4 n N` O N CL N r r r r r r O r O I u i CO O O (O Cl) V n O O n o O N M of M N M V cn O Cn c0 a0 a, M n � O N to N n m r co r m cc n O 0 a O M of Q) oM tCJ 11"J I� M N M O O 6 O V N O cn 00 m m N O It O co n 00 (n O M O cn r a O O N W co O M T to to r N 7 n lh O{ Ln 0 (D O r O M * N n cD M* e O N n W O r N m V O "r M O O n 0 O N cn M n CO N O W O O M 6) O o -, n O N n 00 m O N M v V• O N 0 a 0] O O (� O O O O r r �� r 7 � It 0 Q r r r r r r O O D7 N m r N OD n a0 M O cr) a 1,;i eO rnF- 0 0 N M o co m N m O 04 om- r r r rIo ICD O CD N cn O Mc O t o O n O) O r c coD O O n 0 O O O Q r1N SOD m Ono co r COD (O O M O t -RIO N V O S I O CND On w 'm (Vc-1 m Ch c! <n t- I in M r 0 r O m O 00 0 0 0 4'7 N N n � M e O r a )o to M 0 V o r c) m m n o C O M CD M M cb cn 0 N O ¢] h N CO o O r o CD 0 CD N f7 N m O M O In O CD q 00 z n 0 0 0 0 0 0 r O�� r V' CD Z �, a O r r r r 0 O U = a W r O M O W N M 2 coO n n M h N N co N O cn o N cD O m C+) O Q) [[ W O o V• O O O O o O O 0 O M N N N N Lo f� �} W O r r r r r r r r r r r r O W M O Q OO n m C� I+ M r� Cb N M O N N 2 O Z) O O O n ( O z M M (D L" O L,)t o 0 0 mCi n O O 0 0 0 0 0--{ N a— [] m Q r C 7 m a LLJ U W m 0] Q p r N M V• cU 0 n 0 0 r C7 � W NIM n (D n m O d CO,) C) O u'i OIN�Cn M N N r r r r M r N r r N M N OO v McD N N d n O co N M Nl�lr N Ln (P7O O M M n M N n M I-- G (D (D N N N N N N N Cn V M N n CD N a �rrrrrrr.--rr N O co I co O cn O O O O r v n c0 V' o4 a O h N N e{ R � 4 co Cn N O a N O O O N M co O M O SLn T n o O CO 4 67 O O N M N N cN n (D h N O co a r 'm N M O M O O r O V' Co n w O r O O (D O r N O r r CA r N r N r N Q. r r r r r r M O O 0n Oh (D n W 0 0 O N e O W N cD 0 O rn rn co •t h a (n o ti (n �D O N r C I� O v- 4 M M O co co M (D h V' �,-o I o M 0 7 V' (n n n N to a (n') N O"" )[ M N I' -'o V lA )n O CD rN O (]1 CC M o M d r r r r r r r r r r OO to r n LO c0 CO N O u] OO o --� N N O� (D O r r G1 N O V• c0 O ro O n O� r O r r 0 r O r T T r 0 CO N d r r r r r r r r a ol0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rC°i M V OIQ 1000 N N n O G1 O O CD M, Cn 'n o O r to n O M O CD O V' C7i N O L to � W O O O O O O r r O T �- N C O Z O o r W= O O- <n O N r O O O O V y r-- O n o O n o a N rn CM)n (n V V'0 m o O a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co N N M O N } r r r r r r r r r r r a � U O Q O m n O n n M n q N cn O' -O 7) O (D cn h O n O Ln M co co w' O ( U N U O O O O O O O O O-- r N V' O— t3 O m Q r C 7 L) o U W Q O J a CO O Q Q r N M v m w n 00 m Or Q F M a Y O~ C7 F r- 0 O O N N O M d CL CL M O g O w T c0 v to 01 m n O�z 0 M LO c0 0 w O M cO O K N O O O O r O O O 7 M r CL r r r r r r r r r r r N N m w v u'7 t O V O M n c0 N O N m M O� q� r In m n a g n Ex r O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r r N r r O q L r O r n c0 g q O O N N N n n O r M N a M (0 0 O r M C1 D r- 0 � C CL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r O N y a r r � C 0 y 0 Or O M M a N c0 q n N IC _^ r O O cp N� N N co g O M c0 41 (0 q Z m o r C C3 N v W ;d - " O M CO n rV 0 g N CO N N M° V = O In O M n N M cD n c0 O O� q m O O O O no O O o O mN "t7 q N � 0] /Y ❑ O a) m O n 11 h � M co g O q Lr, � U M N O O O O OO O O - -- N- `- Q O m ¢ m d LLJ w_ y J¢ ❑ r N Q C r Q Y r N M V' tfi c0 n CD O r r F M O H M N vn O in lA <0 N m O M M O r n v c0 FA � r M c0 Ln r v N O O O O r r M r r r r r r r (0 h Lp q N q U) q O o w O M a7 N O r U') (0 m Q1 r M O a O O O O r O r 0 O C N C r r r r r O N N c0 un O n 0 O N c O r n M N O u; C M NM c0 C q b M OC O O O O O O r r r r C, 0 LO m N ^� O O a7 N n C u"7 Q) O 0� r M� O a� O r O [0 M c0 c0 r 0 O c0 N O� c7 M C� 0 0 0 0 0 0 r� �� r N� C rU 2 co 1 r o O_ a� H N W ma) N ) M n g q U) V n O N c 0 7 N 0 N c0 n 0 c G1 m N O x q O O O O O C O O M N N M N N M CL• �� C r r - r r r r r r r r r 0 a- 0 O Q CO m n x n n C) n g N M O R n u n a in M M 3 Ln o ~ N` G LO'l O O O O ',R � ',2 r N V O D c� o n Q r a a u LU LLJ U) J Q❑ U J W CD cD Q ❑ r N M V LL"> c0 n c0 CD � r-- N F¢— H M Y O O to M d d 00 N O N w) r g N O N CC `o c0 eC T CL o r W N r r Wn cV q b n CO N V M q d N r r r N O O c0 n -7 O O N O n dr •- V co cV cc) n 0 a� C'7 <) cM 0 V N O g n q M O O M O O r r l0 T N N n of r r W r r O M M O M O M N d r N N N f0 V N q q Li n V r M N tt N N r rrrr r a r r r r r O r N d] r 0 M O � M� O r � <0 n H7 c0 CO N n f0 n �2 �2 r N n N o0 OO O M mr r r r r r M 0 0 0 0] W C0 T M 7 q c0 i O T' x u6 r N T O - O TO O r� r r = 1n T cN r � � r a r r r n O n n mM 0 m v �0 � r r r r 0 N 0 w l0 n W 0 LO LD Ln r� O r 0 n 0o M a r O cO O LO 'C O 't M to M LO O c0 M v n a r r r r r r O 4] q cA t0 c0 M c0 n v o510 Q7 O n N M n M 0 O r O r n n 0 N 00 M M N O �`y O O O r .-- � M N r d r r r r r r r r r r r a r r r r r r r r r r r r M O g O w T c0 v to 01 m n O�z 0 M LO c0 0 w O M cO O K N O O O O r O O O 7 M r CL r r r r r r r r r r r N N m w v u'7 t O V O M n c0 N O N m M O� q� r In m n a g n Ex r O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r r N r r O q L r O r n c0 g q O O N N N n n O r M N a M (0 0 O r M C1 D r- 0 � C CL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r O N y a r r � C 0 y 0 Or O M M a N c0 q n N IC _^ r O O cp N� N N co g O M c0 41 (0 q Z m o r C C3 N v W ;d - " O M CO n rV 0 g N CO N N M° V = O In O M n N M cD n c0 O O� q m O O O O no O O o O mN "t7 q N � 0] /Y ❑ O a) m O n 11 h � M co g O q Lr, � U M N O O O O OO O O - -- N- `- Q O m ¢ m d LLJ w_ y J¢ ❑ r N Q C r Q Y r N M V' tfi c0 n CD O r r F M O H M N vn O in lA <0 N m O M M O r n v c0 FA � r M c0 Ln r v N O O O O r r M r r r r r r r (0 h Lp q N q U) q O o w O M a7 N O r U') (0 m Q1 r M O a O O O O r O r 0 O C N C r r r r r O N N c0 un O n 0 O N c O r n M N O u; C M NM c0 C q b M OC O O O O O O r r r r C, 0 LO m N ^� O O a7 N n C u"7 Q) O 0� r M� O a� O r O [0 M c0 c0 r 0 O c0 N O� c7 M C� 0 0 0 0 0 0 r� �� r N� C rU 2 co 1 r o O_ a� H N W ma) N ) M n g q U) V n O N c 0 7 N 0 N c0 n 0 c G1 m N O x q O O O O O C O O M N N M N N M CL• �� C r r - r r r r r r r r r 0 a- 0 O Q CO m n x n n C) n g N M O R n u n a in M M 3 Ln o ~ N` G LO'l O O O O ',R � ',2 r N V O D c� o n Q r a a u LU LLJ U) J Q❑ U J W CD cD Q ❑ r N M V LL"> c0 n c0 CD � r-- N F¢— H M Y O O to M d d N O 0 n W N Q)M7 O I o 70 70 ON 0(, N p M0]O r N M OOr r O 0 O N N 0 nC�dO 04N M M(n Co 0070 d' O w'O N .NN co0900 _ 00 O MNI O O N O N N 0 C J CA C r N M 0 0 0 r 00 LO N d' 6i uOi LO �L °7 N N N N y N rN L" 7 0 d' 0 0` 0 r r (O r r- d r d r N co N ccO U� co n (n I m co a O m 0) 07 m O r 0 M� 0O C) r M 0 0 0 7 r co (n 0 MMI CC N N N N N O 7 tf) O 0[ `0] d' OD r r r r r CD r r r t• r a r a r CA M'It Ln W Uf ° LO0 ��co oo ti 0 0 0 p r r 1n ON �' [� 0 (0 N N N N N ON0 c'1 O Oc Cf � O d o, a- Cr LnO O O r Ln r=5 N (0 ° N o.. (D N O] C OOC700 N 7 0 070 N r - O 7 r r0 rm O (O O O r r h N 0 �• N O CL' CO r CD r r r (0 o LO C 1 r, DoN �D Uf ° C N r- CO co O M CON O CD O O 77M 07 f• co m O N 0 0 0 O p (n cnN iA 7 00 00 d r r N 00 O O d` 47 r 0 Df V O r r r t` C r r d r T N O) 7 In C ti ti Q2 O r'0 tiU-3d ([j r (b (0 co r` m d° r- O f` C r d ry 00 -n 0 r C1 N O O O M O M y% r O - O =^ OOr r O 7M N V r r r (o Cr rrrr r ccs drcm m EL `r M7 O`"' C2 O CD N N7 cDtiQ)O r t` 000CN0 O N ti M co r--.1 O coo U1 r`LOI+ C -q-LO 0 00 C 000M C M ,.. N C7 CTC D: M 0 0 0 O r r (�D C rrrr r (x D C r a r N O M 1� >a N co° ti C2] v m 4 Cn r• ° O 00 (0 )0 • M � r r (0 1-- O00 r 't 7 O CDN NNM «7 LO IM O `- (DM LO r N t` tn Ow N 07 r r N CZ N C O 03 r 0 0 0 n r r r CO a r r r r C0 N r C r r r r r a r r r r r N O 7 K7 -It� ° O7 O (n r t` Ln (D co co 7 � op 7 Co f` 7 ° ' M N O� z- O�ODW O O O C O r` �(Dr Orr 0 0 O Oq:M 0-1N NM T 000'-� O(0 O (p Ir CP 00 0 O� 7 CD (D (D L2 (D Oo N �') O CO M O D0) r� ° 7 N h N L u: C, co 0) .0 O co 3° co r O d n O 07 N w . M O M 0 d r` M N M Ln O n o r M r 0 � O r O r� O r O'�J O 000 O MSO] O C C O C 0 r IMS Q 00 00 00 O C4 of O 00 00 r Nr � O� rrrr r CD rrrr r CON.- NC r rr r.- r (DO OCA rrrr r = N � C r� O M CD mm- co 7� 7 0) N- O M o (`o y C CO M CC N° O(!)CC NLa N N r co r--(pn cc MI(0 }O Cl (0 NIn N 7 M Q) O ^ O to M r- COD O O 7 x200000 O N 7 a) 0000 O MLnM MQ�00000C O Nr %�0) 0000 O N(0 M O r r r r r (0 CD r r CO r r Cl O r r r r (p C 0 C 0 r r r r r M C O 06 -6 N N N A 0 0 7 Z u7 CPN _ �nO7N 0 r M�� C6� �O M(D t•r 7 V �n OM v C) O,-.,� cc�03 ��0� _ LOON In Ul)07N a) o N r- CD 00 CC C N1n0 F- (Y 000000 O r F- j'Yco 0000 O V M ]} O r r r r r C V O } O r r r r r Cp L C a O r r r r r O O L r C O r r r r r O O 7 W O -) CD m J C C C O 0 C O a co Cl(n 0 co ti � N (9 m c (] a -C� Q C O Q) C) I N m m U 0' O 4 a� Q O O (n co C (f] N —rn N v N 0 CD 0l O d a' Q co O C r` M (OJ t - N� N 7 N N O �r�Ln O 0 0 0 r 0 r r M O a N ti O m m O O C 0 r O r r _� 0 O O to r- U p MMM O C O 6i r 0 r r (p O Q Ln Q7 u2 F r• U 0 "r"n O 0 0 0 r 0 r r cD O a Cm a m Q U a�idYM< U ~ LJ 0 W Ij CD Li ❑ w Q w 0 O °) ww W ❑ O °1 0 Q Q rNCO W) W Q rN M7 Ln J m m rN('7� (n Pd J m Q rNMI LO p_N X t� co HM c Y CD FaLLI --07 Y Y 0 n m m R (U T O j, >' M OW O N O V M M _ Cp tq r m N M T N }" M O N O D O a t- In m o O N O r V N O O O r O cn m a O N on o to m p W 4Y r V N a r M O O m O a O v L v co q a r M O r- m Co m 0 O M to M c0 p a r M q O r M T N Q7 p N o r V N a r M O N CO a) r- e O N O M M O NU., W O M N N m V O a N M O N ovo n m v a LO 0'J CV T N CO M 7 Lo a O C0 O N o O M ;n M m t0 to Q' CO N N I'- V to a M O � co v � M co Ln a' P- N N m Ln a O ~ c) N N a �' Cp N f N m to LO a r r O N a O CL N C) ON cm Y a r O rnl r a r r r a �2I- r r101� CO M M O T-larni TIM a M � r O �y o EL N o� v N (V m � O �I o cq O a7 CNO m M N M � r r N � CO a r o O torrw co r- ti N CO O r * O o M O r to to v o -I O m co m o - w 0 0= n a O Mer a v O o O N V r- O 0) v M m C-4 O to v a m N „n a' if7 r r V CA O a t'n N N O n O d' 47 O O r M 0) M �` CL'1 r r N M O M a r r r CO _ 0. r r M N a r r M 0 a r >_ o �n ` m to o 0 M tD o r- cn (5 N O m t0 N N O r N M CA tt i M O O m v V N N m O r O M O O O� r M M a r r O M a V a V r r r M O O r p v a r O er 0 v co e v to co m m o n- v o v m o T `n CO m a' 'e u' O N 09 O O O V 'O r� N to to 4' O N co C O O V O N N tt)Ln v M r 0 r M O M CL M r r V m O a (+) N 1 M N a M N a M N M M co to -,r Lo to N cn a ID to v o M to o N M O (D O CD N O [[� 0 N OCO C) to O O N O r O C O NN co dt O(`Z O a CO aNr CL r r r M a r r r M 0 a r r M 0 oc O m v N o OT Nrn vcva n O 00A -v NO O C`nertri v °- a r O O r N M r ar r O r M N M r a r r O r M CO N a r r r M O a r r M a r r M O a r r M 0 O O Lo 't o to r 0 J• r o r 0 0 to v o r 0 1 a O V O r N M O r M co N M O r v O r K) N M O r CO N M CO N M O Co N O r r M N n O a O O r N O M a, a 0 O r r M N n CL r r r M a r r r co N cn y a r r M r Up N a r r N Z Z z 2 Z= C_ Q 0 a O H M 0 to a N o to O7 O V a N to V N a N' O ui O O o (� ON m O M N V C+) U 'U r O V O m 0 U} O O M N V M U O r 0 V O m O iy a) O r O N M V W i O r O N r r W M a 'CO) r O N M V w} a' O7 r r O N r ti >, a 0 r M a O r r r co N r a© O r r r M N Lo Q h a 0 4 co m e a=- O m m m to 0 0 CO Q) a J c7 � O m m 00 to m 0 0 p m N o r� M N O O rn � a) X m O O 12 M N co M Cy O a 0 0 0) t` 0) n CO O m ix m 0 0 o cam O m o o o r o O t o 0 0 o M o cc) O= o 0 0 o m r 0 M N =} a o r r r M M 2 t a r N 2 I-- 'o Co � m c c <n m c c LL, o m m m W o¢ m h r` M n m M W o Q m r- M r` R m LU d¢ m N r M h M O O O W 'O O O M O O O J 'C m O O to M o1 O i Ito O co V n L7 O O M -01N \°�r o1 1 Or O m O O O uM N O T O M O) Cvj O o O V NOf ON N r Q` O m M N N n a M N T IN a r a N r r O a r r r O n 0 0 N M N M N Q° N fb O r- o0 0 � O o � O � � O � N in x m V O= nO N m n M n 4 n O N N '7 M Co w M M d m V M N CM 04 Cp d 6 M N to 0 r a r co NO M M O5 On O n c O In n n � M n a � O -.) O O M o men o O to n N -,t n a F- V M r n ao M{ O m M a n (0 d � O =Nvr CL M O fC� 14 1 o-1 M N m n 0U. 0 O co v w m O N N n n n o a' 00 LO a N LO U7 M x r� C-4 M a r r LO a r �- ICD ti fD V N I O o O V M fn N In M In -It N � aIn N r CD Ln cn N r M CO a '° o1ww ( M_IcD to co m m N U, V CO N N CO r r r U, O a !Z n M O I CD I C MV a O CD M I i a O m y o r M N MO O M O M f0 0 O O t- N M co n Of I� 't m T n M IL o O` -' O m m O I2 iD N r 4 !A a r Ct7 N �(') n cc N co o M � N O M O N a M r M n m N co o O� to nM m O� Inmeo rno v� O Inas nM r— (D cx r N r 4 o In n r a N ,- 4 4 M r I r v N r o a un n a .- r .- r v a r .- r r LO N r a r r r M r N N n N° Orcn(nto r, cc Y Or m0v ccoo "a ZOrinrnm nm vT M M r 0 O Or ° a O M N r O m N IL N fn a r r r 7 N M O m a0 n N M o 0 0 05 M Cn co e - Or c0 m n N r- f O m u4cD Gon ro O f)CON Qoo v Y O m if)co°oa ca n f Z�'aOMNr��=.Z dOM"�"�M�ZMdOMNrraMv zu O° r O o 0 r O° M a N M N N a T S a "' � n O wC °.\-. u^y W (D '� O N M N N 4 r-. j f fC O M m n ffl N O1 O - �' 7 ID - It O M m n co N O1 }(II d (X1 M N N N M a o M N N M M O r r r r Cn } r r r MCL CL CL S C J C C S J C C S m J C C = C O° Q oa m m O o¢ oo m o 0 o Q M COO CN CM9 N O O= a O O M COO 4 'DD N O O y TJ O M eD� 0 N O O = 1 N F h M M M N M o_ y~� M M M N M O- N F n M M co N M f co rr rug maw m Qom' m =a�mQorrr ren m0. t�nc i w w ow co u� ~O w M u: ~O m w J o ao a J _ a J a Q to o o r N Q 0 § °� Or r r N Q= a o •- r N Q G �- M O F- M Q. fn r rn m o 0 N r a N r O co N� Lo 4 o OC O N a` W 4 iD r- L cm N fn V m cD fD M a r CO M V N Lo 0) 4 o -' _O a' m a ko N N to N V M N O o 00 N n n c) O M 0 O r aLo Lo m 04 Q1 O w do w N n a' jn a Ir m N 4 m In In N Lo a M O o M fn O r 0 O t M = N N r' M m n a M O M n M O u7 cD � r Oto Lo v v O In co O r Q N a V T r NCo h m _ � N c-1 r N o N In N O C Lo a r r r CD O M r OO O u) n W M r N o c:l 0 M r O a T r a r M(m m N co a0 C N v po O '� C7 c M � r N M Lh 4 v p C) N O ui O I M �2 �2 M m m CN CMD N r r9 v � C O O J I D O ~ O I U M V V N 2o ° a Q ~O d CL 2 d a W QQ O 4 T N F r � W Q. T N M O N j, ry to T p co cD Dol O N 00 M'r N O N n M 0 1� Q N m m M N a N to T O O m a c Rm almc� N a N N O M M to u7 n 0 0 N N O A x O C 0 CL O N co C`M') O N co cD Dol O N cO ori O N n M 0 1� Q N m m M N a O r O N a N to to C- N M M to u7 a C-4 r -D o Mr o o in co omtr n v M O o O n o NO to O M M d m M Lo � d m r MCO vco Md n° Ln v O �rNirn O m O m O O -W O j CD M M m� t4 Ln a Ln to a r d tit (o d d Lo -- pl a� N _ m M tD IA m m fD o M n a LO r c0 O m O m r r O {� u tzz v n m tun p v M Kl c- ti n m 2 d til) cc a r M M M M a r to to ui a r O N 0 - O M ro a0 MN N f, m tom to m y m y v o O N titti O f� O r ti O r M ti O M I- Q r d' CO O r Q- tD O �' <D V 0 M V (D O M O M w' fD tcl 0 a r a r Lo O a r cn M co M r to Lo 4'J to r N N N v M co v m 40 f` N M m tD m cD co cD co a�0 m m Q, n O O :D O m O O O d `n o r a a rvi N M cv �' a a LO to � a v O T m M N no Ntit = to i t to N N N O CD r O to m to m m tD a0 (o n N N m O O O a O d to L d- M M M m d O N O N Lo 4t4) V�l d CO to o N r t0 m m 00 0 o to o to N N is _ �; O r O O r O � r�� M O M M M M M d M o `Y�' a � LO c- d 4 10 d CEJ �[] to K3 Q r co O r "s M O rM O T O T N o 0 0 M a M NtD N0 O u) to � W m coN X N LL 0 0 r a' N a r t 0 m Q N a r N M N m m C7 M M N a r O O -n n7 0 In a' N a O LO .-- m m N N to � m t�D co O M NO (07 n 0 N O N O -� N O L411 O O N =u)� to r r r (DM vM M to N M to u� ul to r a r N M N M c? M M M a <-' a m O m 0 v to v to a' a v 7 4 v r r a a M O to M M N t` N t• 0 m O m O M O r 0 O r O r O r O >" a' b O tt7 0 0 �� = O M M -V N M O N M N M a' O m W m co a' O d. r c�'] u7 v r- m y a r a r to u] to Ln a r M M M M a v v v v a r r Z O r O O r m O M -O O r (D N O M O O r N tD N (O O O r' Mao M tib r- co ti ro r O O m W M tIn roll v u7 m y (n a 07 O O m Q5 a' m cV m N a m N N N N a m m m m m a m ,� q V a O r a 0 In ui 47 t[l p, O M M M M a 0 7 n -O r r r r Q a ' O O O p r p O O o 0 O_ O a O= O m m m O M o m o N m N m to m to r m r m ro to m u] N ul N to W co cmc N n V a' m m O m m a' c0r N in o v n v Z U a o a o to to to u7N y o M M M n o n n o r Lu ¢ oto p Q CO0000 p O carom O O UQ a' Q o p OO CD 0 0 f0 o m Q °' O �� ti m m m m N N N N tin¢ J mm to to to u� O O z F ti O m m m rn to F~ O 17 to to h m h tr O 0 0 0 O M M M M F fh () O M M M 'n l) to to to Q F N U O ,p 0} F 0. m U Q () Q () Q a r O Q r r r ip�7 W U W W W i W U w m y w p qp Q r Q Q Q m¢ CO tD m p Q a' m m a t0 SD of F Q fl. Q Q I- Z M Q to r m p of O n to N a U' 2 2 2 T- to CD M M Q r m - m Y W W W W W W W W rL C7 Cn Cl) (n ❑ cn M M M n 0 0 N N O A x O C 0 CL w z O a Q O � O Ow IL) z a O� C) } uj fd Q a 2 = 2 = u u fu F- ❑ e 0 0 0 0 o X v n c X n O M N T O x o Xx m N CT rn p a) M M �p co m LO � _ O n n c O U') U� Ln lt7 M o 0 0 o e e e e o xV o V M "e e X n m o rn O O N m X M N� N m c X N m o7 o,❑ m 0 x rn co m to O M O M O N M n +� O on') t O O O O Q) F Lo O o CC7 Cf) a e e e e x O T m �o e XMnna) �_ O O v N 00 x 00 Cn N c V- x N � ❑ X m �. O M + H CD CD M a0 p 7 N N O 00 CD c) m rn n r- c C,4 N N N N 0 0 0 o X� m co o n X m O O O O n x `n m Q)_ x T ❑ X 'ItN L m M M M M co) p 00 o n m m m n H Ul) to N W') u] e X o 0 o a c O °) X V Cl) (C) U'J O O co M m �_ ❑ x o m v x O M N N LO Lo Cl) 0 A❑ X N r m N N m� m v CD N N o N LO a M M n n r c; m i-- ul� RC1 L(] in LO 'D T Q M M Q NT J /fl T (D N D W W W W lC M M Co. M C� o¢a Cl. d0. U Y Q d LL d d 0 0 o e _ X N CD N CSU c x o v m a O N N .N_. N O x o x m a0,"my ti a) M M �p O n un n m _ n N 0) N Q) Nm 00 4m co O N N N N H o 0 0 o a o a e o x :;F O 7 O "e e X o o .N... �N+ .N... N m X M N� N 07 Mr 0 CO O') ❑ X N In Q7 to O M O M O O O O7 O c0 O 00 m m H m m N N N N N a e e X N m N m �e o X M n M n �_ O O O O a x 00 Cn N c V- x N � ❑ X m �. O CP 0 0 0 00'. W H T N O COO N CO N 00 n 00 1-- c C,4 N N N N 0 0 0 0 o N 4 N LO n X n n n Il - m C14 T N n x `n m °) tr- x Cb co m m❑ X N V Ql M M M M co) p 00 O rn r v n 00 r c0� CN W O N N N N N e O O O O am N 0 O °) X v M c M r O r O m �_ ❑ x o m v x O M N N �_ x _ O m ❑ X rn M M Cl) M M m� M Q o 0_,o m o n n n n � N N N N N N 'D T M Q c�m¢a�aa (n O Cfl p O DJ W W W W cc 1 M M M M C� o¢a Cl. d0. 0 0 0 0 _ N O N m M M v c X O O O O O O `O x O � Xx o N m m x:s M M �p N O O _ c, N co M co M 75 in O v Cl) m O O m O CA O M S �2 N o 0 0 o x o X� N T N T W X M N� N m x T M 7 to O M O M O T _O N T lot � 0 0 X m N N 4 a X rn n o T r O m X n O v m O O y �_ x Q> N m ❑ x 00 Cn N m X n V N Tom. N N m M O 0 0 0 0 00'. W H 'r V M M 0 0 0 0 c X rn N N X m m .... N..r N n m Xu)chu�c� rn m x `n m Yco 00 O 00 O o V o in o LO m n n n r - F M M M M co) p a o e a y m Q m )SC Obi e O O O O x W M co CA °) xx m �_ ❑ x o m v x O M N N R m M O M O O CND Cccc w ( It OD ((D H M M Cl) M M p M Q F J T CD CD = LU 'D T M M M M c�m¢a�aa SL W W W a o o e xn O O M c X O O O O O O � Xx o N m O w 0 x:s to M m Cl) 75 in O v Cl) m O O m O CA O M S �2 N 0 o a o o X O N m V X CO m V GO m W _ x n Ln is m of rn � m 0 0 m co N �2 �2 N e e o 0 X 9LO M O o X n O v m O O y co _ x (h N O O❑ X n V N m O N CO n pnoar- Od' CD N 4 u,Ln N �2 N e c e xo X M N O O O O m cc X u7 N V) m O x -i u� v m o_rn o 0 p 7 t M N 04 { N o 0 0 0 e X M O to x W M co CA O O N T m �_ ❑ x o m v x O M N N N r T CD m C7 p N M M F N � CA { N a JMr N SL W W W C�9 W m Q N 3 R LO O 7 U u 5 a a u `m 4) O O 9 O O CL 0 a C C a N w U o c _ O 7 l�J U U O tV a` a N d C � 9 d 0 E u O z a h O O N CL 0 0 ° o e X U) O U) r o x V Ul V Cl 0 v.'1= O O O u7 X O CO O t0 O � x CO ' a ❑ X N 000 N O M Cl) a M 67 N o r r r r Z O IF id M 0 N r rCO r r C U) Ln U) U) U] H x c X 01 0 m CO v X 0 0 CO 0 e X V V N CO O ❑ X Lo Lr, v M X r o 1O0 V x F V V 7 c V 04 c e e o N V U) N U] O r 0 0 O M r 0 0 c0 0 H CO 0 0 LIO `0 M 11-_ o a o x co X V U7 V U] 4 � 0 o a o co m v m v O CO r CA h C) 0 UJ U7 U) U] O ❑ X N M N 0 m CI 07 m N M CO M 0 o N M V r r r r h r U7 u7 ui CO U) N O O O O O X M N i"S N N x �C-.N N (D O m V M N Ch M a X N Cn C7 O O X N V V V V H a r N O O r N O 00 00 O CO m m m m F- U) U) N'7 U) U) 0o O o c a Xto 00 00 r O❑ X CD X u' O N 00 0 0 D O tr x M O o a >xl N r N ,tr qt M jp 607 0 CYj 0 CA CO �p Ln H N C`7 Cl) Cl) M H U aa`aaa W r0 M c¢D Qc7¢adad W W W W a m r) m co Cl R C7 Y a 4 0_ d IZ h O O N CL e e e o e X X c2V m X <D 0 r 0 v.'1= 0 X O CO O t0 O O x O yx( O M Cl) a M 67 N o r r r r Z M �2 M f'- N N � 'n C14 'n m M O m C7 cn M H x c X 01 0 m CO v X 0 0 CO 0 e X ep O o7 q O ❑ X Lo Lr, V O X CO O t- o p oc)O X— v m r F V V 7 c V N c e e o x M O M O O N N N N N C-, O , Nm q r Q r M 11-_ e v a o x X O OM O M co X V U7 V U] 4 � xx CD O O m v m v O CO r CA h C) 0 UJ U7 U) U] d r 0 N CO N 0 m CI 07 m N xx cc m 9 X 0) of It O O O O N r N r N O X M N i"S N N x �C-.N Q (D O m V M N Ch M ❑_ Xveo�o� a c0 CO CD 0 CD N V V V V H tr U7 U7 O V N N O O O O O F- C`7 M M M C'J 0o O X cn Cn Cl) W a X V V r O❑ X CD X v M v M 0 0 D �0 m M M co M O O X V N V N 0 r N O M W M Q1 �p CO N O N O 67 O O O O � N C`7 Cl) Cl) M H U aa`aaa ao Qc7¢adad r 0 M (o< a m i U1 W w w ¢aQdn` h O O N CL o o e e x - r r r r e X U) N LO N N N N N 0 v.'1= O V O ❑ X O CO O t0 O O ❑ x N M Cl) a M 67 @ o r r r r Z M �2 M f'- o 0 0 o x c X 01 0 m CO v R Q `,C x O ❑ X Lo Lr, CD N f6M��;QM N CA N r O 0 0 0 0 0 CD F V V 7 c V c e e o x M O M O X CA co 67 co C-, O , Nm q r Q r M 11-_ x Q N 00 Q X V U7 V U] N N m N O CN6 V V C17 Ui C17 ko r v r v O CO r CA h C) 0 UJ U7 U) U] d X � m SCD O O a p N xx cc m 9 X 0) of It O O O O N O X M N i"S N O x �C-.N 0 (D O m V M N Ch M N M �2 �2 M y c0 CO CD 0 CD O V V V V H V V V V V a o o a a X V) cl) 0o O X cn Cn Cl) W c �_ x O❑ X CD 0 m 0 0 0 0 D �0 m M M co M p _M N O C7 N O r H J C 0 M c¢LU = tu LU LLJD r m C1 M m ' c7 U aa`aaa h O O N CL o 0 o a e x X N 0 cc N r r O U) O V O ❑ x x O t N N M W m O co cornrco Z M �2 M O O O 4 o X r l!'7 fP CO X N m 0 r v x m O u7 N O❑ X r M N 0 N CA N r O CC Q r C1 a V (D V U) V U) M �2 .2 �2 M 0 0 0 0 cc X 'ItOr 4 O O O O .- C-, O , Nm x V 0 LO O G xx U7 C) r M Q N R N m N O CN6 V V C17 Ui C17 0 0 0 0 d X � m SCD x O O N N 9 N N M N r rn 61 m p 0 (D O m V M N Ch M F M �2 �2 M N N V V c X X U) U) CO N O O a d xm�;°� 0o O x 0 to N O 0 �C7 p _M N O C7 N O r H r 0 C2 Cao Z) WW W W Qc7¢adad h O O N CL 0) N z Q � CE O C- C) U C u 0 Z C7 O W U U Q W � O 0 d' a m ❑ — Q O U C � C 7 a O N N O U o c f0 O 7 N 5 U W Q O p CL a a L) o E E o z a CO o 0 0 0 O W cn N m U N O U t Q1 4 = N OO x` v v N O N N 44 ` .0. C p rn o G E d x m O M X 7 O O v O m X N 2 Y C ¢ c N o 0 0 0 O x U} o X CO) R u7 V > Q O O O O a � M � M CD X N Q x` v v N Q o0 0 0 e e o 0 O O O O e x m O M X O O v O m X 9r _ - n O ❑ xX C. O N p M M M M M N Ntov co O v O 00 O M O O I- O to CD m (D F' o a e a ' X N O❑ X Cfl m n O O N N V N N n to V M to M to O _ ^ r O ❑ x CD p — — — CJ X O O m 0 m n M O O O 00 0 m m H O Lo u7 t0 L47 N a o 0 0 c M CO M M u7 Cl)M _ m M Cl) Cl) M m X O O D O 0 x M N n O X W N r CO (D to _ p d n O to o a m n n n n 0 o to to m Ln co O m O M O 0 O m o m m m CO 0 J r CD (D d < W W W W O toF M M M M CO J r O �2 O U` Y Q d) o 0 0 ' X tD CO tD tD > Q 0 0 0 0 Q O O O O a� � M � M N ❑ X Q X — - v N Q o0 0 0 x XC11 C14 Mm M M O O O O m X a a O O O 6> 4 Q X O N O 00 O 00 O❑ O (rp O O O H p M M M M M N o o g x X o o v F' O O O O n a o e o O❑ X N M N O N N N C to V M to M to n co M M M M OX w 0 0 0 0 co p x W) x 0 X O O m 0 m n M O N n N r- N O ❑ X v .M.r .c N to tp U[ h in Qc N n N n _ m M Cl) Cl) M 0 X O O D O F- 0 co co M m M fn< r CO (D to _ p d W W W W v v v t� m ¢ a_ a` ti ti O 0 N N r O T X 0 0 CL d e X Q1 M m N y o M O N Q O O O O a� tr X N n M 10 Q X — - v N Q 0 0 0 0 X ^ e X a a v O v r m OX O 00 O 00 O❑ X M N M N p N g O O N O N N a1 O1 Q) ! ) F' uul) ui Lo Un U� a o e o c x ro iD m m N N n n X (A M V OX w O O u co p x W) x N N m n M O N LOCO U') Co O N 00 00 O O O O F-- to tp U[ h in e o 0 0 x(D N (D N o X O O D O 0 co co M m o x v C+i v c� to _ p d X M in M tL') x v v v N co O m O M O 0 O m o m m m CO 0 0 v v a H J r O �2 O aj W W W W a a F co c7 M M cD a as a li Ci O 0 N N r O T X 0 0 CL O y o X N C V Q > a p O O O tU m X N n M 10 Q 0 o c e X N m a m e x N n M O v O v r m On X 0 p n tnn x N a o e o X c X M co M Cn N N n p X (A M V OX ap ❑ M O co n X M y ` N N m n M O N r 03 to m O F _ e e o 0 x rn co of v o x rn o v N N to o eo to m I: _x O O X O n 0 00 N 0 0 0coN m O J- O co D 41 Z) WW W W r M M M M R Qc9¢tia O 0 N N r O T X 0 0 CL Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections N O N N L O 0 0 00C O N o � L c � O � E O2 C W O L O m 0 O 7 CD E O 7 � L L 7 N cn S � N NIm L �I� 00 OOINI I�MM�� IC4 0) I DI k 04 00 I f` M �;1C1 I � k r- Ln N_ N ttn L 0 0 10 co0 0 0 O O O O 00 O O CD M ti M V r N r 10. N C7 v v M w a E M o V O O D v M n 00) O O O 0 0 0 0 O O r. V M co r r N 0 !- co to N 0 r ch y co r N .- r M r o Cy v O C R � N a Q O N O C1-) O V Cn O M .. O�,� O 0 0 0 or O. O LO O co O , L O r r r1 M O LO 00 V a, N Q N r co ON r' C y i 1 GCi b1 Eo O O o CD CN O O 0 O ti ti In N M O M f_ CD r- 00 OLO _ n0`7 m N N G M 4 O (�� coCS] O a p N F G1 �000a o 3 N y N LO CD CD LoOD CCD to 00 0 0 0 M O r- 000 M O O O m- C14 t, ta�9 Cl) O '00 co co p Z C71 C 4�7 0 00 N LO� 0 0 0 ti M � N O p N O LO V ti Q ' b a N r M N O 04 ti v7 w fCII lC9 C 0 Oh a ^� Cb y p 0 0 O N M 0 CD M N tD Cn O� O V m O O r O N O O V O] V.TO 00 0 r. O p 0 O a C M a N 5 M z H N Cn : 00 N r Z) �: 0, r r � i 0, r r Lo 00 � H *mvof h Q o ate-. Y.(D Y � i Y cD.� Y Y Y L a s =z o c - f E E <p 'A' V w 4 = t a LL � _ LL C o. O) a� a s LLI C a h V L L Y *+ Q = E 7� g N N w O 7 D ''' N' y O y N 0 m O V 1 a O a Q— C a- i O@ LL E m> a a Q� — o n v, H c a' Q >> N Q N a o C7 �+ a yg a E c a mcn a LL _ E N a n as of O d a o p c Z o al' 5 Li o Z o L °o a@ s _� o ¢ acraci E m E'p C/)c = o _ m j= O a m a C-0 F ca o 13 J a R Q Q 3 1► N L O W L U - 3 d r U o Z .a i 0 C ro r'a y i d y d Q) u>> O a g z v v O O N N O U 0 y Oco U O N N a` L CN � L a) O M C D w a D 0 L2 p 0 0 o O N O (D h O N Lo O V M V M M o O � I$ � N � O N T n N O I N O (D O O O CO S M CD _ O O Q O LS7 R N O O CD CO O h N h r� h h O O) 00 M 00 N CD n O O N Ln h w O C0 T 0 (D aD w m m m m Q O O O N O N I'- M n O O O (0-0) N M Ln 0 (D w O N M�t 0(N 6] r co c0 (O Ln O (n O h h h h h m m m c;w m co 0 O > > Q LD 09 V M CD h O CD M co O N I N N Lo O in C-0 h C7 r (D M r p m m m v CO h w O) r- N N n N 6] m m m O O Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln (n Lo Ln LO N n CO Ln h O O M N 0 O Q Q r r N M M M CO N h 0 h h rm h w N m 0 0 0 Cl) M N coCl) S 0 (m O m 0 CM m -a N o w 0 R w cc N M M M M T T Oro n M y O r r r r r 0 O N O G'7 h CO h h m 1� N m 0 61 a 0 6: O �2 �2 r- V in N a 3 i d N M H. Z > @ N O p L R @ � (o O M Om0 Nco � V p (O (D CN O M n N M n N O a) r n N O Q U n cm a� m o a n (n co (D o r IT o y> m a --jco w w >; ti t-: h n r- m o n o r v J d a_ OK5 61 � -t3 N @ O— OM Ln r O r n 0 O_ 2 }> Ln m M f) (D h r V M O O O O O 3 (� r w m O m m O) T r M (D Q Z N O N LU w O C 0 m N Q r N M Q M 0 N M M a G O m m 0)�— O r V N 0 co p 0 0 o O a o 0 o D o o O coo O M h N T n N O G� O I N O (D O O O CO S M CD O i ce' ; '7 O CD CO O h h h r� h h O O) 00 h 00 i -0M I'- M n O O O (0-0) (M O C O M (D c0 Q (O Ln O (n O I M (n CF O > > Q LD 09 V M CD h O CD M co O N I O LO N Lo O in C-0 h C7 r (D M h h T 6] m m m O O O O O C O m M > mrn J20 h 0 h h rm h w N m 0 0 0 Cl) M N h (m O m 0 CM m m o 0 R h NN 0 m �r N N O N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v T N c�7 a 3 i N O p L O (o O M Om0 Nco � V p (O (D co m i c i N O N CO CO h O C 0 Ln CO r a G O m m 0)�— O r V N 0 co n o M w 0) V w R R C m CDN 14 or p r M Ln V h V N O O (n O N ch O 67 L7 m 0 j0 O ` w W y ril O N M i O + O O La r ti N V N (+Mj R y G7 65 G7 O O O O O T Q) Q� M y c A > r co O L (o a LU M Q r N m (n ICO r 00 O) O r I yJ a (7 ( r O 0 O O N IS (6 7 O 7 co L co L O r O 00 r00 Cl) M M CD O o t() N T N 00 O r M NN _ r Ln O O Ln M (D (L) f~ r N N T N f• Ln r N (fl r d r N d r Ln N O LO O ") M 4) h r Ln Ln r r V0 0 V r i� OD O O N m M 4) I� O O M !� N r N O N N (O L('1 V Lo N M r r Ln r N a r N O LO M 00 O N M N r 0J O r (O N CO ti o L.- ' U (0) Ln (0 fl- m O O O O O M co (O O (Q m,, CV O r r N O r r Ln Ln � N r� c� C)p r r r r r r co r r r M r r Ln r N N NLn N M Ln O M r N r f` r N M O Ln M O o O U MO M r (O f� M Mme. CLQ M O � (Ln� co tf) M C9 ocDi u"7 r _ _ gr r r r r r (D r r M r r r r Ln to N N d Os r-- N O r N r 07 h M M c0 O r r r 67 Lo o N y o r M o N�Coo o L7n r;--:: ` NV Or (M9 N M N_ OO V r � M r r r r Ln 64 N O L N coM N O ti 00 I` Ln O O m M LO O M00 o u M 00 O 00 O0 r O N O O N00 U r p O O O O O O IT M r N N N O O r r (D r r r M r LC) r N tl C r Ln - O N 00 Ln M Ln r 0 Ln 0 00 O (V co L 'o O r N M Ln O M co) N Ln N Ch I• d � p p O C O 00 O N r 4 O N M- T N r� C r O O r r (O r r co r r In r 0 Ln Ln 0 (o N O r CO N r r N r 07 t0 o U N ti (bti ao O r 0 0 (O I-- M 00 I` 0 0 0 N N N N N M (J (^. M N CO O r M M OJ �' N p r r r r r r- r r r M r r r r Lfl r N � O (p O M M i-- to N co M (o O _L M o C7 U O Ltd r Ln M m 00 M N 'J m 0f� R (.rj N N N N N N r N N N .LJ (`") N ca M L QO r r r r r r� r r r M r r r r L7 r N N d r � M 0p O ti O O N r r I� 01 O N O O N r CV ti LA M Lo r N N N N N M N N N (O u7 r N N Ln 0 orrrrrrr�-rrMrrrrtn� N � N _ NLD r !- r Ln r I, r N N O� O r O o r U r Mw m O I- O O (• M r C4 r r-tl- 00 00 N r r r T r O N r N CO r M () Cl) rLn M L r Ln d M N d r N to O O r V t-- LO m r r- co N N Ln O a p O r r r r (O M 00 03 (n r M O M Lo C5, 0 O r m Cl) o7 N O t0 O O r 0 0 0 0 l4') r O CO r M r N to O r N C O r r r d r r rn O (p 00 Ln r 01 M 1!�! N N O N r N M CO c a ' N (D N Ln Cl) O M m M I, (D O N r 0 M S p O O Q 007 M r O O N M N N M N r 4 p O O r r r r r O r r r M r r r r Ln r N N � �:+ D f4 O M N r M ti f� CO N M O O + m O O (D d1 ti M N f` r M t` co N M OLO Q N O L!') I` Ln I� Ct C Ln M G? M L9 Ln (SJ N L6 � s N 7<n O � Lfi ti r o Ln Cl) Q M (1) Ln O N m = O U a m O 0 0 C O C O M N M r. r_ c = O V O- r O Q O 0 0 0 0 M <M-- N LO r t? O �- O r r- M r r Ln r., T E V O Q L N¢ O C: U N U 0-0w _ o oLU *. Gr uel C� O r N U w ❑ r N M � Ln (O n to im C) (6 C) M< p r N CO r Lo co n co CA r r c O 0 (tl Q r F o aO CL a` EL a o CA moma_ CL d WJ L o °�__ j Q L N Q> d Q N a Q 2! ej0 ,' in 0 C O U c N 0 O y U O E c c °` or d 4l — O U E2 122- a m p �, d a� cu c 3c9 z 2 O N m o v Lh v y ,� o) ro j d Q) @ u� Cl '� � r J "' 4) - C) oa a �� W mo 1'S 0 O O 3; o� -0> Q �� IZ C ti C i e> ' C) Q z 0 �' o aj 4) 2 i c a) o z Q41 Y fl U o 3 f' 4d a1 Y a Uo 7 x m 0 -r- 2 2 m N j O a m V) c 0 0 U O (1) N O = a i .� ca C N N O (4 W r2 0 (4 (D Q z O m LO 6 T CJ O C) N M N 67 N C C7� O V V O CO O M c0 r• O O C`J N n N m CO V T M m O E T T r M T LO V � U O N I` O ti N M M Q) _� CO 4J 00 r- O N COn � N M � 00 � U) N Cn6 Q r T M T T T N fi v r CO N O � TT ti O O N O O U O � 0 ul r LO M CO Ui M r N Y N N CN N CO LO V N N Lf) p0 r T T T r CO N n r CO O O N MU') N 0� N N_ In 't CA "q - CO U m O N N Q) 1--O O r,- M cO I- t` ti M O N N r N CO !;2r M N d T � N M u7 CO T O ti O M N I-- L 41CO 00 O� I� T C Tp 0 r T T r co T r T M r r CA N O N � D O O CO CO N O CO N M 7 co N co I- O Q7 O M O Co O O m C Il- CD V O LO M' 00 p O O O O O O M MM p O T T M r �- T N a` c O DD to tt O m N N N ca NN M c0 M o U w N Ln M O V T M O M F- O CO N O Cn p M 0 0 0 0 T r O O N M� N M N~ p 0 0 r (ND N d 7 CC) co R C p MO I-- co CA f� ti co I-- ti CJ N co O O + CV C C O 03 m 4: r-� O LO M C M O LO cO Nim' � m L 00 V cn Qi O C O O O O O M n N VU m N a T U Ut Io C � o c w _ Ua C14 @ C) Q Q r N CO V, lly CO f, 07 D1 — }0 o CL (3 Q c a - o m °�— ya m 46 > Z` m o ` y m >3) U O O a _ c ~ U @ L ci C:L � O CO C N O CO a roQj �a) moo 0 W m m a) JM d•O� "SOL Q) OO Z 0 O d v (a C L O ►i 4d 01 Y� Uo 7 OD N x co 0 v L O N 7 O 12 75 m Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey El co O O N L Ls m 2 N 0 0 a� E a O J Q LL LU C) Jjj� `/ ro d OI�r r 0L n 0000aa00000C)oo0 r T11- 0001 0 G'� m1 OLoI-OMN000M 0MOM0 MONT(ONO�lIOOMr 0 MON Or'- N00r Coo 00 - CO- N Ln�q N(DMM(O0r-wM(D -,to M M NOW o' o 0 0 r O r O O r r r N M r O r r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r O o r r r r 0 0 C N O COr T 0r00N0CDNMI`0LOMM- QNN 4"0((o0 M M CO 0,1- Wrr w - ONS v OO Cf) OLnLf7MONr Ll�NLnNrN LO(OMI-CDL(�M� r� Cn0000i-I-0o01` I�MM'D �M6�M d LnLDMr M O!) f�MOLf)M N (ONl;rM 0m w 00�L"Lf7MNLf, co")M(OONNO(D(OM000oO0� r r r "KT r I�f�OM� CDf_[AI`� lf��l� O i m o r r M M N O N O M N M CO M r M M r O 0 0 r O O N r M N M N T --NT M� o r T � O O O O a a Q O O Q O 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 io Qf OOrOCOMOOOCDMCOOOI�O V LC»N00071� f�NOO�t)OO�aLt)f�t-OM(D000Od�� U d 0CAI__U-JO 00 Lomr-ON:coo N MI`(0 rN Lf) N r__MW0,q MLS Q N 000001l-0Wr,-N N.Zr CO(DMI- 0C00rzj-MMM(0'cl-03 LOWr- t»CDr M LD ot'-MON r rN M o OrI* NM V V OrONNrMorNMrCo0 N Mr Ti 000rO00r-NZ-r f 0 N N 0 M NrT o i N _0000000000000r00000000000aoaaoaaaa00000 N is OCflf-001`N<5u-) M 0Mo1�r LO 0 M Ul M Mr - M 0 0 rll-)l`MCMM0I-OI-0WW 0 F - Oi-- O�MCD�M�r LOOrMCDOIl- MI-(OLf�OCD I- rMOW I -I` 0 MCD N r- NMN IT I` �N rMrNM Mrr CONMMLOI- Nr-MCON Nll70ONC0 IT 0L00000M CANM r �000000000000rr0000000000000000000000000 a) ❑ 4) 0 (n CD r-40 ❑ 00000lqtNrN"TL1 (n C 3 LnI- OONM qqrI�CDOo10I` a C NN00o(O(O�(OI_0OmMNOD0, N 0 0 p O 't<0Ph N m r NMI`(O L IZ �) U)° � N -C14 cn in U) MCoL0 3 c IZT qgrN0 a� Cl) W 4'- N LO M a)5 rN 0004N0 50 c z =30° N O` Umv m � o N0�ca)o°�ooaLi-0 (n 0 0 cn — (Y U 0 O -r— OLLJ � O opo M aNiaci �— UU' �v��U) O CZ C3 O O a)Q cn� W �H~>>> a�a� ca (a uim C T I... f0 CV CO - tl a� v (D ` 0) C ° i (} O = L - O m -0 -0_0 -0 -o -a -a a) UI a)�w _ E N a) -- _ = O aCm O O It N I- r- M N r CO N Ln M N M LC) r O f- I� � q CD Lf) M M M T CO I'- N M M M q CM I- r CD o N L O C "' r N N r C N C5 N r 7 M r r r C6 N (6 Q) t0 a) r (7 r r C Q LL a) r r L i N C a) N :D (C v�cnCL ��w`a�� Lcu`mo c�o��a�a�� oc"amc"a�ma�i��aC°i>>3 cc� � as O a r Ln 00 LO Co r r CD V � LO CO CD h- e- Lr) M Lo 0 r C) 0 "t CV N r (D O co CO Nr O 'T LO It r r r r r N r r M r r N M � N OOLt,) N MM V' Nr I- OpCDCOLnOOM0Itco OM-L1»oOM(OT-000 V 0W W NI�O)NM r r rCON N r r NN NNNMNrNI- MN N Mr r00 (D M W d �Oo0000000000ao000 0L n 0000aa00000C)oo0 0 G'� m1 o' O COr T 0r00N0CDNMI`0LOMM- QNN 4"0((o0 M M CO 0,1- Wrr w - ONS U NNr NMO Ll�NLnNrN r� Cn0000i-I-0o01` N M O!) N (ONl;rM C= r r r "KT r O i m N U U �MNT-NMMLONM OrtiTOrCONOCDN N MI`(0 rN Lf) M000 MLS Q N 000001l-0Wr,-N N.Zr 0C00rzj-MMM(0'cl-03 M LD r r rN M o O N NM V V o i N d N is M 0 F - N04 N r a) ❑ 4) 0 (n CD r-40 ❑ (n C 3 a C N 0 0 p O O N m L IZ �) U)° cn 3 c a� c� C ca C m N (n 3 a)5 50 c z =30° N O` Umv m � o N0�ca)o°�ooaLi-0 (n 0 0 cn — (Y U 0 O -r— OLLJ � d-0 opo M aNiaci �— UU' �v��U) O CZ C3 O O a)Q cn� W �H~>>> a�a� ca (a uim C f0 CV CO - tl a� v (D ` 0) C ° i (} O = L - O m -0 -0_0 -0 -o -a -a a) UI a)�w _ E N a) -- _ = O aCm O C C L i (� L U� C (o a C (1) —_ O a C C S= C C C C C C C O C O> O O C 0 L O C "' Y 2 O— C C N C5 N N 7 M (� (� N C6 N (6 Q) t0 a) t0 N l� a) (6 (4 N C Q LL a) U 4S N L i N C a) Cp :D v�cnCL ��w`a�� Lcu`mo c�o��a�a�� oc"amc"a�ma�i��aC°i>>3 cc� � ❑ QQQO�COCoQ7UUUUU❑=�YYYJJJJJJJJJJ0 0 -off W(n> E� 2 N O L 0 (D t1 0 N O 0 J_ LL, W J Z Fn � fL � O M M 0 M 0'RI, 0 0 Ln 0 CD r Nr N Ln CO 0 O Ln't M O in 0 M O Cfl O Ln r N N O �OrC14M M O C) "T 0 m N M M 0 0 'I CO N r N N _ M r M CD LO O M CO 6) 0 N +�+ 0 r N M M M i T M N m CL O H y r M r (p0Ln't000oN � O U I-00 I- Nr-- O U Li) N r 0 d w M O qr Ln r - 0CD co O N N Ln r M Ln N C � m r r CD r -coN CD LL C: rLnr CT) 000 NLnC3NCo LL o = U v m O OCO000LOW V BOOM � N r 0 M M �r M r r M M Lo 0 0 N r r Q� C1 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 M y V LOC) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r L rZ 0 C7 W) V Co ti O N� O O CV W 2 L 4 N E p z p c N coo p U) O Ln N 0 m O O 1 CD M M co O m I- I- co LO qm T Ln M O M 3 �, c U N N M M LO r r QYrON� L i p Od'ONIN r 0 W c CL -0-0� 52 W o 0004 L Or co — CD rMOCfl U U CL CO 4)s O N Y Y � N w N> N 4 NOQ w O -j.i-1a 0-Oflu) +� H O 0—rD,TN( 0 C� ' N ti O 0 CO CD 00 0� CO 2 o0 N O CO M O O'lzr 0 M O 47 O �LnM Cfl rN0 I- M NCOO 0 N M N N O I` MIct N N (D M r M r M u '= OMrMCO r rm-M 0 r c 01 W J_ LL, W J Z Fn M � fL � O M M 0 M 0'RI, � 'c r N N O �OrC14M M O C) "T 0 m co d co r CD LO I- r O N co N N O I- M i H v N m CL O r M r (p0Ln't000oN H I-00 I- Nr-- M Ln N C � v U v O O OCO000LOW V BOOM H MNMNN 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 M y V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r L rZ 0 0 V O W L 4 N E p z p c N coo p 3 �, c U L i p u c CL -0-0� 52 o o C L (a — co — m — LL U U CL CO 4)s O Y Y Y � N w N> 4 NOQ -j.i-1a 0-Oflu) M r d I� O M M 0 M 0'RI, M r M N O (D M O C) "T 0 0 co d co r CD LO I- r O N co N N O I- M i r N m CL N r M r M H v O A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V = C i Q u U U O ti O 0 CO CD 00 0� CO r o0 N O CO M O O'lzr 0 M O y M r Cfl LO I- M r 0 N M N N O I` MIct N N (D M r M r M u '= L a M _ -r-- E E N N z (° 3 0 c a V CL o w a� C 4) °-0 c� p U N C N +- N p p N (B y (0 p U 10 0 3 N 3 oQ� �� c�-c �Y� 3�CL �g> a° w° M `� = mo o o o (n p a)_; `' o m M N > "O p "O U N N N C N 3 C= p> cQv� U QQmmmco00C000O O U m m f0 W222YYJ_�I L 1 �I��Z N � C t9 (D O CL N C Z a) ate+ O QO d N .0 I- CL a O F- M 0 to M O H U) L 0 U r N LSi � C7 C'7 O `CC tp m y M M 0 2 is a� N woo r 04 -a N M C 'C3 m V O m (0 U� LO r- (D (D '- h d uj N � C t9 (D O CL N C Z a) ate+ O QO d N .0 I- CL a O F- RO00000 (D a u U u O Noocnrntno�c�rn N � � V CL 40 0 91 M RO00000 (D a u U u O Noocnrntno�c�rn N � � V CL 40 0 91 U U) O O r U Ed 00 O O CV v m a 0 0 N C0 C) c� M O C.0 CO ti Li) N .2 N O N M N Ltd O � (M I --CD o IT I` Lo i- N 00 O � M Of0 N O o N Q O r O O r N T r Q CO T- o" o"� o 0 0 o Q o 0 o 0 0 o o Q Q o 0 0 �o a-. v CC Ln N'IT C.0 co co 'T 00 O 00 M u O M Lo O -;r 0 LL N c- N LO CO N LO r CO Ln 00 qt Q M M fA r 0 0 0 0 o Q o 0 Q 0 0 O O Q Q O= O 0 0 0 0 O O Q O Q o O 0 0 0 0 R O d)FCD 00 co r` M 0 co O CO O V- W 'T LO O M O t` ) r r 00 M O N O O O CD N 14-Q O N O 0 0 0 0 0 O Q O Q O O O � L CO O O O a 0 O O O O O a O O O Cn O N r r C'7 0.) I` Q co U-) 00 O � Lo N C O C'l � t` M M O N CD m O a w N Q O r O O O O O r r Q O O N O w Q O Q 0 0 0 0 O O Q O O 0 0 0 0 Lf} 07 Q C77 O O M CD T C O Q Lo r r _ LO 0 0= O N c0 N 00 L m XC0 Q) (� C C M N O �0UL2�a-cn0- D 07 Q 0-0-0 r N M M r r CO r CO r c r Q N -e c c �- N � ca C4 CB Lf) co co (ll LC) N Y - - �C �C O 0 2 D U J J J J J J J J d N co co CD M O a 0 Q O CD r 0 CD O� M N t` ti M Q 00 M M N N t` N O N r N r ti r O) N w a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 N .2 N � N Ln ao 0 o CO a o N N LO 0) O N N O m M N t'- M r � H � LC (1) O �o V Cl)cl C.0 I` CD O N CD O t` r M M r r r M -r-- �- oU > c v> Q W 0 CL Q (1) O N U) 4- -0 m J U) a- CO U u O 00 00 1 O O) N (i Nr C3) 0) 'T Ln N CD t` L) Q N Co O r r C3) 00 V � L a Cn O N w � � c o o �' c � � O c� o <c _ 0 0= O O Z +.+ L m XC0 Q) (� C C M N �0UL2�a-cn0- D 07 Q 0-0-0 -0-0-0-0-0'0 =_ () 0 c c c c c c c c �- CB � ca C4 CB ca co co (ll Y - - �C �C O 0 D U J J J J J J J J d ti Ln L7 N N 00 00 N � N Ln ao 0 o Q o N N LO 0) O N N N m M N t'- M r � LC (1) �s �o Cl)cl -0 N N J Q O �- oU > c v> Q W 0 (1) O N U) 4- -0 m J U) a- CO 00 0 N DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Issued with a 14 -day comment and appeals period Description of Proposal: This threshold determination analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the following actions, which are so closely related to each other that they are in effect a single course of action: 1. The adoption of the Auburn School District's 2008-2014 Capital Facilities Plan by the Auburn School District No. 408 for the purposes of planning for the facilities needs of the District; and 2. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of King County and the cities of Auburn and Kent to include the Auburn School District's 2008-2014 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. The cities of Algona and Pacific may also amend their Comprehensive Plans to include the Auburn School District's Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. Proponent: Auburn School District No. 408 Location of the Proposal: The Auburn School District includes an area of approximately 58 square miles. The Cities of Auburn, Algona, Kent, and Pacific and parts of unincorporated King County fall within the District's boundaries. Lead Agency: Auburn School District No. 408 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse environmental impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after a review of the completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public upon request. This Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issue. Comments must be submitted by 4:00 p.m., April 28, 2008. The responsible official will reconsider the DNS based on timely comments and may retain, modify, or, if significant adverse impacts are likely, withdraw the DNS. If the DNS is retained, it will be final after the expiration of the comment deadline. Responsible Official: Michael Newman Associate Superintendent, Business and Operations Auburn School District No. 408 Telephone: (253) 931-4930 Address: Auburn School District 915 4" Street N.E. Auburn, WA 98002 You may appeal this determination in writing by 4:00 p.m., April 28, 2008, to Linda Cowan, Superintendent, Auburn School District No. 408, 915 4" Street N.E., Auburn, WA 98002. Date of Issue: April 14, 2008 Date Published: April 14, 2008 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAC 197-11-960 Environmental Checklist. Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for non - project actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if appiicable: The adoption of the Auburn School District's 2008 Capital Facilities Plan ("Capital Facilities Plan") for the purposes of planning for the District's facilities needs. The cities of Auburn and Kent and the King County and Pierce County Comprehensive Plans will be amended to include the Auburn School District 2008 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. The Cities of Algona and Pacific _Comprehensive Plans may be amended to include the Auburn School District 2008 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. A copy of the District's Capital Facilities Plan is available for review in the District's offices. 2. Name of applicant: Auburn School District No. 408. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Auburn School District No. 408 915 4`h St. N.E. Auburn, WA 98002 Contact Person: Michael Newman, Associate Superintendent, Business/Operations Telephone: (253) 931-4930 4. Date checklist prepared: March 31, 2008 2 5. Agency requesting checklist: Auburn School District No. 408, 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The Capital Facilities Plan is scheduled to be adopted by the District on April 28, 2008. After adoption, the District will forward the Capital Facilities Plan to the cities of Auburn, Algona, Kent, and Pacific, and to King County for inclusion in each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. The Capital Facilities Plan will be updated annually. Site-specific projects will be subject to project -level environmental review. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The Capital Facilities Plan sets forth the capital improvement projects that the District plans to implement over the next six years. The District plans to construct a new middle school and a new elementary school over the next six years to meet projected student population increases. The District may also add portable facilities at existing school sites. The District will also conduct technology modernization projects at facilities throughout the District. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have undergone or will undergo additional environmental review, when appropriate, as they are developed. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. The cities of Auburn and Kent will review and adopt the Capital Facilities Plan for the purposes of updating the cities' school impact fees and incorporating the updated Plan as a part of the Capital Facilities Elements of both the Auburn and Kent Comprehensive Plans. King County will review the Plan for the purposes of implementing the Counties' impact fee ordinance and incorporating the Plan as a part of the Capital Facilities Element of both the King and Pierce County Comprehensive Plans. 3 11, Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) This is a nonproject action. This proposal involves the adoption of the Auburn School District's 2008 Capital Facilities Plan for the purpose of planning the District's facilities needs. This proposal also involves the amendment of the cities of Auburn and Kent Comprehensive Plans and the Ding Counties' Comprehensive Plans to include the Auburn School District 2008 Capital Facilities Plan as a part of each jurisdiction's Capital Facilities Element of their Comprehensive Plans. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the sites). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The 2008 Capital Facilities Plan will affect the Auburn School District. The District includes an area of approximately 58 square miles. The Cities of Auburn, Algona, Kent, and Pacific, and parts of unincorporated King County fail within the District's boundaries. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one)- Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The Auburn School District is comprised of a variety of topographic landforms and gradients. Specific topographic characteristics of the sites at which the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan are located have been or will be identified during project -level environmental review when appropriate. 4 b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Specific slope characteristics at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project -level environmental review. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Specific soil types found at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project -level environmental review when appropriate. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Unstable soils may exist within the Auburn School District. Specific soil limitations on individual project sites have been or will be identified at the time of project -level enviromnental review when appropriate. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject, when appropriate, to project -level environmental review and local approval at the time of proposal. Proposed grading projects, as well as the purpose, type, quantity, and source of any fill materials to be used have been or will be identified at that time, f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. It is possible that erosion could occur as a result of the construction projects currently proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan. The erosion impacts of the individual projects have been or will be evaluated on a site-specific basis at the time of project -level environmental review when appropriate. Individual projects have been or will be subject to local approval processes. 5 9 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings?) The construction projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have required or will require the construction of impervious surfaces. The extent of any impervious cover constructed will vary with each project included in the Capital Facilities Plan. This issue has been or will be addressed during project -level environmental review when appropriate. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: The erosion potential of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and appropriate control measures have been or will be addressed during project -level environmental review when appropriate. Relevant erosion reduction and control requirements have been or will be met. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Various emissions, many construction -related, may result from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The air-quality impacts of each project have been or will be evaluated during project -level environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project - level environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any; The individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project -level environmental review and relevant local approval processes when appropriate. The District has been or will be required to comply with all Gj applicable air regulations and air permit requirements. Proposed measures specific to the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project -level environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? if yes, describe type and provide narnes. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is a network of surface water bodies within the Auburn School District. The surface water bodies that are in the immediate vicinity of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project -level environmental review when appropriate. When necessary, the surface water regimes and flow patterns have been or will be researched and incorporated into the designs of the individual projects. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require work near the surface waters located within the Auburn School District. Applicable local approval requirements have been or will be satisfied. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Information with respect to the placement or removal of fill and dredge material as a component of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project -level environmental review when appropriate. Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied. 7 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Any surface water withdrawals or diversions required in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project -level environmental review when appropriate. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Each project included in the Capital Facilities Plan, if located in a floodplain area, has been or will be required to meet applicable local regulations for flood areas. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Specific information regarding the discharge of waste materials that may be required as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project -level environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Ground: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may impact groundwater resources. The impact of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on groundwater resources has been or will be addressed during project -level environmental review when appropriate. Each project has been or will be subject to applicable local regulations. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals , . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. 0 The discharges of waste material that may take place in connection with the projects included in the Plan have been or will be addressed during project -level environmental review. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may have stormwater runoff consequences. Specific information regarding the stormwater impacts of each project has been or will be provided during project -level environmental review when appropriate. Each project has been or will be subject to applicable local stormwater regulations. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may result in the discharge of waste materials into ground or surface waters. The specific impacts of each project on ground and surface waters have been or will be identified during project -level environmental review when appropriate. Each project has been or will be subject to all applicable regulations regarding the discharge of waste materials into ground and surface waters. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Specific measures to reduce or control runoff impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project -level environmental review when appropriate. 0 4. Plants: a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: evergreen tree: shrubs alder, maple, aspen, other fir, cedar, pine, other grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, water plants: water lily, eelgrass, other types of vegetation bullrush, skunk cabbage, other milfoil, other A variety of vegetative zones are located within the Auburn School District. Inventories of the vegetation located on the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project -level environmental review when appropriate. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require the removal or alteration of vegetation. The specific impacts on vegetation of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Pian have been or will be identified during project -level environmental review when appropriate. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. The specific impacts to these species from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined during project -level environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native pians, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Measures to preserve or enhance vegetation at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project -level environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local landscaping requirements. 10 5. Animals: a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: An inventory of species that have been observed on or near the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project - level environmental review when appropriate. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Inventories of threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project -level environmental review when appropriate. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on migration routes have been or will be addressed during project -level environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Appropriate measures to preserve or enhance wildlife have been or will be determined during project -level environmental review when appropriate. 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The State Board of Education requires the completion of a life -cycle cost analysis of all heating, lighting, and insulation systems before it will permit specific school projects to proceed. The energy needs of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined at the time of specific engineering and site 11 design planning when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe: The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on the solar potential of adjacent projects have been or will be addressed during project -level environmental review when appropriate. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Energy conservation measures proposed in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be considered during project -level environmental review when appropriate. 7. Environmental Health: a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan comply or will comply with all current codes, standards, rules, and regulations. Individual projects have been or will be subject to project -level environmental review and local approval at the time they are developed, when appropriate. 12 b. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example; traf iG, equipment, operation, other)? A variety of noises from traffic, construction, residential, commercial, and industrial areas exists within the Auburn School District. The specific noise sources that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project -level environmental review when appropriate. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create normal construction noises that will exist on short-term bases only. The construction projects could increase traffic around the construction sites on a short-term basis. Because the construction of additional school capacity will increase the capacity of the District's school facilities, this project may create a slight increase in traffic -related or operations -related noise on a long-term basis. Similarly, the placement of portables at school sites will increase the capacity of school facilities and may create a slight increase in traffic -related or operations -related noise. Neither of these potential increases is expected to be significant. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The projected noise impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated and mitigated during project -level environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? There are a variety of land uses within the Auburn School District, including residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, utility, open space, recreational, etc. 13 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. The known sites for the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have not been used recently for agriculture. c. Describe any structures on the site. The structures located on the sites for the projects included in the Capital Facilities Pian have been or will be identified and described during project -level environmental review when appropriate. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? The structures that will be demolished a Capital Facilities Plan, if any, have been environmental review when appropriate. a result of the projects included in the or will be identified during project -level e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The sites that are covered under the Capital Facilities Plan have a variety of zoning classifications under the applicable zoning codes. Site-specific zoning information has been or will be identified during project -level environmental review when appropriate. f. What is the current comprehensive pian designation of the site? Inventories of the comprehensive plan designations for the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be completed during project - level environmental review when appropriate. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Shoreline master program designations of the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project -level environmental review when appropriate. 14 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Any environmentally sensitive areas located on the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project -level environmental review, I. Approximateiy how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The Auburn School District currently serves approximately 14,060 full-time equivalent ("FTE") students. Enrollment is expected to increase to approximately 15,450 FTE students by the 2013-2014 school year. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Any displacement of people caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be evaluated during project -level environmental review when appropriate. However, it is not anticipated that the Capital Facilities flan, or any of the projects contained therein, will displace any people. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project -level environmental review and local approval when appropriate. Proposed mitigating measures have been or will be developed at that time, when necessary. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The compatibility of the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan with existing uses and plans has been or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive planning process and during project -level environmental review when appropriate. 9. Housing: a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. No housing units would be provided in connection with the completion of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. 15 b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. It is not anticipated that the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will eliminate any housing units. The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on existing housing have been or will be evaluated during project -level environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Measures to reduce or control any housing impacts caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project -level environmental review when appropriate. 10. Aesthetics: a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project -level environmental review when appropriate. b. What views In the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project -level environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Appropriate measures to reduce or control the aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined on a project - level basis when appropriate. M, 11. Light and Glare: a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project -level environmental review, when appropriate. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project -level environmental review when appropriate. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Off-site sources of light or glare that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated during project -level environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Proposed measures to mitigate light and glare impacts have been or will be addressed during project -level environmental review when appropriate. 12. Recreation: a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are a variety of formal and informal recreational facilities within the Auburn School District. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. The recreational impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project -level environmental review when appropriate. 17 The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, including proposed new school facilities, may enhance recreational opportunities and uses. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any; Adverse recreational effects of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to mitigation during project -level environmental review when appropriate. School facilities usually provide recreational facilities to the community in the form of play fields and gymnasiums. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. There are no known places or objects listed on, or proposed for, such registers for the project sites included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The existence of historic and cultural resources on or next to the sites has been or will be addressed in detail during project -level environmental review when appropriate. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. An inventory of historical sites at or near the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project -level environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Appropriate measures will be proposed on a project -level basis when appropriate. 14. Transportation: a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The impact on public streets and highways of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project -level environmental review when appropriate. 18 b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The relationship between the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and public transit has been or will be addressed during project -level environmental review when appropriate. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Inventories of parking spaces located at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and the impacts of specific projects on parking availability have been or will be conducted during project -level environmental review when appropriate. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The need for new streets or roads, or improvements to existing streets and roads has been or will be addressed during project -level environmental review when appropriate. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Use of water, rail, or air transportation has been or will be addressed during project - level environmental review when appropriate. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The traffic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project -level environmental review when appropriate. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The mitigation of traffic impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be addressed during project -level environmental review when appropriate. 19 15. Public Services: a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The District does not anticipate that the projects identified in the Capital Facilities Plan will significantly increase the need for public services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. New school facilities have been or will be built with automatic security systems, fire alarms, smoke alarms, heat sensors, and sprinkler systems. 16. Utilities: a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, and sanitary sewer utilities are available at the known sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The types of utilities available at specific project sites have been or will be addressed in more detail during project -level environmental review when appropriate. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Utility revisions and construction needs have been or will be identified during project - level environmental review when appropriate. 20 C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that tt�e�lead agency is relying on i em to make its decision. Signature. _G' 2 /, -- Date Submitted: 21 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? life? To the extent the Capital Facilities Plan makes it more likely that school facilities, including new high school, middle school and elementary school capacity, will be constructed, some of these environmental impacts will be more likely. Additional impermeable surfaces, such as roofs, access roads, and sidewalks could increase stormwater runoff, which could enter surface or ground waters. Heating systems, emergency generators, and other school equipment that is installed pursuant to the Capital Facilities Plan could result in air emissions. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan should not require the production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances, with the possible exception of the storage of diesel fuel or gasoline for emergency generating equipment. The District does not anticipate a significant increase in the production of noise from its facilities, although the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will increase the District's student capacities. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Proposed measures to mitigate any such increases described above have been or will be addressed during project -level environmental review when appropriate. Stormwater detention and runoff will meet applicable County and/or City requirements and may be subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permitting requirements. Discharges to air will meet applicable air pollution control requirements. Fuel oil will be stored in accordance with local and state requirements. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine The Capital Facilities Plan itself will have no impact on these elements of the environment. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require clearing plants off of the project sites and a loss to animal habitat. These impacts have been or 22 are; will be addressed in more detail during project -level environmental review when appropriate. The projects included in the Plan are not likely to generate significant impacts on fish or marine life. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life Specific measures to protect and conserve plants, animals, and fish cannot be identified at this time. Specific mitigation proposals will be identified, however, during project -level environmental review when appropriate. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The construction of the projects included in the Capital facilities Plan will require the consumption of energy. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be constructed in accordance with applicable energy efficiency standards. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection, such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The Capital Facilities Plan and individual projects contained therein should have no impact on these resources. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: No specific measures are being proposed at this time. Appropriate measures would be proposed during project -specific review. Annual updates of this Plan will be coordinated with the Cities of Auburn, Algona, Kent, and Pacific, and King County as part of the Growth Management Act process, one of the purposes of which is to protect environmentally sensitive areas. To the extent the School District's facilities planning process is part of the overall Growth Management planning process, these resources are more likely to be protected. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The Capital Facilities Plan will not have any impact on land or shoreline use that is incompatible with existing comprehensive plans, land use codes, or shoreline 23 management plans. The District does not anticipate that the Capital Facilities Plan or the projects contained therein will directly affect land and shoreline uses in the area served by the District. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: No measures to avoid or reduce land use impacts resulting from the Capital Facilities Plan or the projects contained therein are proposed at this time. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The construction projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create temporary increases in the District's need for public services and utilities. The new school facilities will increase the District's demands on transportation and utilities. These increases are not expected to be significant. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: No measures to reduce or respond to such demands are proposed at this time. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The Capital Facilities Plan will not conflict with any laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. 24