The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3839 (22)Ordinance No. 3869, (Amending or Repealing Ordinances) CFN= 377 — Comprehensive Plan CFN= 775 — Capital Improvement Program Passed — 12/11/2007 Comprehensive Plan Amendments — School Districts' Capital Facilities Plans 0 ORDINANCE NO.3Y4 67 AN ORDINANCE of the city council of the city of Kent, Washington, amending the city of Kent Comprehensive Plan to amend the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts (CPA -2007-3A). RECITALS A. The Washington State Growth Management Act ("GMA") requires internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements and the plans from other jurisdictions. B. To assure that comprehensive plans remain relevant and up to date, the GMA allows amendments to the capital facilities element of comprehensive plans concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a city budget (RCW 36.70A.130(2)(a)(ni)). C. The city of Kent has established procedures for amending the Comprehensive Plan in chapter 12 02 of the Kent City Code, allowing amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the city budget and allowing the city council to hold the public hearing instead of the Land Use and Planning Board. D. The Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts have submitted proposed amendments to their Capital Facilities Plans to be included in an amendment of the city's Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. E. After providing appropriate public notice, the city council of the city of Kent considered the requested comprehensive plan amendment and conducted a public hearing on the same on October 16, 2007. 1 Comprehensive Plan Amendmentsi School Districts' Capital Facilities Plans F. On September 21, 2007, the city provided the required sixty (60) day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 to the state of Washington of the city's proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan and the sixty (60) day notice period has lapsed. G. On December 11, 2007, the city council for the city of Kent approved the Capital Facilities Element amendment CPA -2007-3 to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached and incorporated by this reference (CPA -2007-3A). NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE SECTION 1. - Amendment. The Capital Facilities Element of the city of Kent Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached and incorporated by this reference (CPA -2007-3A). SECTION 2. - Severability. If any one or more sections, sub -sections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION3. - Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after the date of passage as provided by law. 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendmentsi School Districts' Capital Facilities Plans ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITI(,CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: NkleL%.-TO BRUBAKE ATTORNEY PASSED: day of �PJt,�2007. APPROVED: day of 2007. PUBLISHED: day of 0�� y^e� , 2007. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. r(lo , passed b) the city council of the city of Kent, Washington, and approved by the mayor of the city of Kent as hereon Indicated. BRENDA JACOBER, CI CLERK P \Civil\ordinance\CompPlanAmend-SchoolDlstncts'CapitalFauhtiesPlans-2007 doc 3 Comprehensive Plan Amendmentsi School Districts' Capital Facilities Plans EXHIBIT "A" 0 Emerald Park Elementary Site Emerald Park hlemcntary School Emerald Park Elementary Serving Unincorporated ping County Residents And Residents of the Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, Renton, and 5ea7ac, Washington Apri12007 Kent School District No 415 12033 SE 256`' Street Kent, Washington 98030-6643 (253) 373-7295 SIX - YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2007 - 2008 - 2012 - 2013 t KENT 'C la«t Dibr RICT BOARD of DIRECTORS Jim Berrios Bill Boyce Sandra Collins Chris Davies Mike Jensen ADMINISTRATION Barbara Grohe, Ph D. — Superintendent Fred H. High — Assistant Superintendent for Business Services Mark Haddock, Ph.D. —Assistant Superintendent for Learning & School Improvement Margaret A. Whitney — Assistant Superintendent for Human Resources John Knutson — Executive Director of Finance Merri Rieger — Executive Director, School Improvement 9 - 12 Janis Bechtel — Executive Director, School Improvement K - 8 Jeanette Ristau — Executive Director, School Improvement K - 6 Greg Whiteman — Executive Director of Information Technology Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2007 M KENT L HOOIL L7K,TKtLT SIX - YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2007 - 2008 - 2012 - 2013 April 2007 For Information on the Plan, please call the Finance & Planning Department at (253) 373-7295 Capital Facilities Plan Contributing Staff Gwenn Escher-Derdowski Forecast & Planning Administrator Fred Long, Supervisor of Facilities & Construction Karla Wilkerson & Lynell Mooney, Facilities Department Don Walkup, Supervisor of Transportation Department Kathy Foslord, Purchasing Department Cover Design by Debbi Smith Maps by Jana Tucker Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2007 Section Page Number I Executive Summary 2 11 Six -Year Enrollment Projection & History 4 III District Standard of Service 8 I V Inventory, Capacity & Maps of Existing Schools 11 V Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan 14 V I Relocatable Classrooms 17 VII Projected Classroom Capacity 18 VIII Finance Plan, Cost Basis and Impact Fee Schedules 23 I X Summary of Changes to Previous Plan 30 X Appendixes 31 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan I April 2007 I Executive Summary This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Kent School District (the "District") as the organization's facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, Renton, SeaTac, Maple Valley and Black Diamond. This annual plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2007 for the 2006-2007 school year. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and Renton and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. The first ordinance implementing impact fees for the unincorporated areas was effective September 15, 1993. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee -implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and Renton must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Plan has also been submitted to cities of Maple Valley, Black Diamond, and SeaTac. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a "standard of service" in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Program capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Relocatables in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (continued) Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2007 Page 2 I Executive Summary (continued) The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District standard of service and the existing Inventory, which Includes some relocatable classrooms. The District's program capacity of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the reduction of class size to meet the requirements of Student Achievement Initiative 728. Relocatables provide additional transitional capacity until permanent facilities are completed. Kent School District is the fourth largest district in the state. Enrollment is electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) on Form P-223. Although funding apportionment Is based on Annual Average Full Time Equivalent (AAFTE), Enrollment on October 1 is a widely recognized "snapshot In time" that Is used to report the District's enrollment for the year. P-223 Headcount for October 1, 2006 was 26,996. P-223 FTE (Full Time Equivalent) enrollment was 25,864 47 (FTE reports Kindergarten at .5 and excludes Early Childhood Education [ECE] and college -only Running Start students.) The actual number of individual students per the October 2006 full head count was 27,590 (Full Headcount reports all enrolled students at 1.0 including Kindergarten, ECE and college -only Running Start students ) The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of transitional facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of relocatables. A financing plan is included in Section V I I I which demonstrates the District's ability to implement this Plan. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated annually with changes In the fee schedules adjusted accordingly. Kent School Distnct Slx-Year Capital Facilities Plan Apnl 2007 Page 3 I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years. (See Table 2) The student generation factor, as defined on the next page, is the basis for the growth projections from new developments. King County births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system. (See Table 1) 8.235% of 21,863 King County live births in 2002 is forecast for 1,800 students (900 FTE @ .5) expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2007 Together with proportional growth from new construction, 8.235% of King County births is equivalent to the number of students projected to enter kindergarten in the district for the next six-year period (see Table 2) Early Childhood Education students (sometimes identified as "Preschool Special Education [SE] or handicapped students") and non -disabled peer models are forecast and reported separately. Capacity is reserved to serve that program at seven elementary schools. Full day kindergarten programs are provided at most elementary schools with alternative funding for the second half of the day. The first grade population is traditionally 7 - 8% larger than the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District from private kindergartens. Cohort survival method uses historical enrollment data to forecast the number of students projected for the following year. Near term projections assume some growth from new developments to be offset by current local economic conditions. With notable exceptions, the expectation is that enrollment increases will occur District -wide in the long term. District projections are based on historical growth patterns combined with continuing development of projects in the pipeline dependent on market/growth conditions. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools and monitor conditions to reflect adjustments in this assumption. The six-year enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions may be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The Kent School District serves seven permitting jurisdictions. unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, and Auburn and small portions of the cities of Renton, SeaTac, and Maple Valley The west Lake Sawyer area of Kent School District Is In the city of Black Diamond. (Continued) Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2007 Page 4 I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR (Continued) "Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last five years. Following these guidelines, the student generation factor for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary .444 Middle School .148 Senior High .252 Total .844 Multi -Family Elementary .293 Middle School .058 Senior High .094 Total .445 The student generation factor is based on a survey of 3,746 single family dwelling units and 1,283 multi -family dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy rates. Please refer to Appendix E on Pages 35-36 of the Capital Facilities Plan for details of the Student Generation Factor survey The actual number of students in those residential developments was determined using the District's Education Logistics (EDULOG) Transportation System. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2007 Page 5 J W O~ SLL U M N N N wa Y ui MW W Q U O g E m J E m J mJ m J Oco N U') N O pN C�Ln ! p p N 0 I . N00 N `� N 0 ON' m N N � CN o ai o co o r 0) M C ONf U) CO '- N N O M N w 01 r ((pp M N N N O O N in r r O In IC9 N v N n N N N r O N cp (O N N N N N n (8 N O v O N N O) N N 0 N N r 1n o N N M N N O o N N O OD 1 N N r N4 N to M N 01 r O � N n N in O N Oo M N NNN N M N v N r o N N O M aro I rn Oin n OO r n CO r r Cl) N h v a O V7 to O r o O N N LO NNOD m r�i N v m a V7 N Nm o m E 52 G '° 2+ v C 9 al T N N p M (p Ot O) O O r M O V O co vN Cl)- ` p - 5 O r O co m E m NN DD N N N N N N N N r N „ _ v 2 r r a til Dnp O f0 (O O r M N N LO O YN AL1 Of M cn C w N N o o er- N m p M r Z m NN (p r N N N N NN N N N r N (O O C C O I m e LO T �p o cn o T N C4 pp (`7 m m w m rn LO N Q (0 o O O O N O N O N n v O 8 j £ m O N N 0 O N N N N N N N N r0 N o r , (N� N V) cnrD C1- N (N� O O CND M C r E O j Of O r N O r O CD r LO `'' 1! E m r N OO r N N N N N N N N N r N 0 N p� U M n p� O o LO CO LnVp ��py n N 0, V e4 M CNA Fl E m N N O O OI W a0 f0 k L y m r N DO N N N N N N N r r r r N O p s h 00 C%i M OLu N Y 93 O OO O 0) h /f IO LLm N N N N N N Itg1. JE C N L tD o N o r N rn o a0 v O n M .n N 04 a $ o o O r lt! r n O N O O m w 01 N 01 a Co 07 O O N W CO to O q E m N O N r N r r r r r r C v v O r 04 2 3 0) g m oay n Ln r O) N N O N O � h 0 O N a a W D E M �. l[j O ^ O m COO. ! co (OO_ Q D m r N OD pOj N N w CS C � in r n O n M 0 (O N O1 Ol to t(pp v N O O O O 01 Of N Cp (O O n C (C 2� m n E N W O1 O M CO W 0a> W CO fO (n M r �O W > r r r m r N (X)r r r r r '- .- r N g c X � 04 O r O O O 2 c N p W O 9 r O M W O O N O T O1 n r O fO M plj C N m N 0 d m r N 0) N N r r r r r r r r r N M C Qp e r4 N y.0aD O r (n N v 0�Mp o p N O E c INO O o Obi (n o CO ' to fO Y N N O O m r 04Q1 O N r N O+ M y C h _ T O K (O 8 M N CON N 0D O N N aD Qpy C O e r O m W 2 m (O < N th ' W m r r r r r r N N L C C in �i p N o O Mr Y Ln Mr Wr O N o C C 6 OW o NW C r W aa m r r N > > CI ✓ y, N ry L CT L O a a 2 J W > m m J , C cn E E m N .- N Cl) Y t0 n' CO ,r.., r 2 ww v Q o U > W N p c c C2 La 2 2 2 a3 (O N E ri FL- YU� C7 U' C9 Ute' U` (D > 0 - N e KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX -YEAR F.T.E. ENROLLMENT PROJECTION LB In 2001 LB In 2002 LB In 2003 LB in 2004 LB in 2005 LB to 2006 LB in 2007 46+1 Al 0 J C �' 1 n Cictoberl 2006 1 2007 1 2008 1 2009 2010 2011 2012 King County Live Births 1 21,778 21,863 22,431 22,874 22,680 23,500 23,600 ' Increase! Decrease -709 85 568 443 -194 820 100 Kindergarten / Birth % 2 822% 8.23% 824% 824% 824% 824% 8.24% 211 Kindergarten FTE @ .5 895 900 924 942 934 968 972 Grade 1 2,003 1,900 1,928 1,979 2,017 2,000 2,072 Grade 2 1,998 2,062 1,954 1,983 2,035 2,073 2,056 Grade 3 2,026 2,032 2,117 2,007 2,037 2,090 2,128 Grade 4 2,015 2,082 2,097 2,184 2,071 2,102 2,156 Grade 5 2,051 2,031 2,125 2,140 2,228 2,114 2,145 Grade 6 2,101 2,082 2,083 2,179 2,194 2,284 2,168 Grade 7 2,205 2,153 2,146 2,147 2,245 2,260 2,352 Grade 8 2,254 2,270 2,216 2,209 2,210 2,310 2,325 Grade 9 2,772 2,709 2,751 2,686 2,677 2,679 2,799 Grade 10 2,212 2,329 2,312 2,347 2,292 2,285 2,286 Grade 11 1,881 1,912 2,077 2,061 2,092 2,044 2,038 Grade 12 1,451 1,487 1,617 1,754 1,741 1,767 1,727 Total FTE Enrollment 25,864 25,949 26,347 26,618 26,773 26,976 27,224 Note 2014 Yearly Increase 55 85 398 271 155 203 248 Yearly Increase % 0 21 % 033% 153% 1.03% 058% 076% 092% Cumulative Increase 55 140 538 809 964 1,167 1,415 Full Tlme E uivalent FTE 64 25,8 25,949 26,347 1 26,618 1 26,773 1 26,976 27,224 ' Kindergarten enrollment projection is based on KSD percentage of live births in King County five years previous 2 Kindergarten FTE projection at 5 is calculated by using the District's previous year percentage of King County births 5 years earlier compared to actual kindergarten enrollment in the previous year (Excludes ECE - Early Childhood Education) 9 Kindergarten projection is at 5 FTE although most schools provide Full Day Kindergarten with alternative funding 4 Oct 2006 P223 FTE is 25,864 & Headcount is 26,996 Full student count oath ECE Preschool & Running Start = 27,590 G R O W T H P R O J E C T I O N S - Adjustments for current economic factors For facilities planning purposes, this six-year enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 April 2007 Page 7 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of the District's facilities, King County Code 21A.06 refers to a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the District which would, in the District's judgment, best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as "impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower class size at those facilities. Relocatables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (See Appendix A, a & C) The standard of service defined herein may continue to change in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service adjustments to meet the requirements of Student Achievement Initiative 728. This process will affect various aspects of the District's "standard of service" and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Because the funding for Initiative 728 is incremental, implementation of the Initiative is also incremental and may result in annual changes to school capacity. Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students Class size for Kindergarten should not exceed an average of 22 students. Class size for grades 1 - 4 should not exceed an average of 23 students. Class size for grades 5 - 6 should not exceed an average of 29 students. Program capacity for general education elementary classrooms is calculated at an average of 24 students per classroom because of fluctuations between primary and intermediate grade levels (i.e. third/fourth or fourth/fifth grade split classes, etc ). Most elementary schools provide full day kindergarten programs (FDK or KAI — Full Day Kindergarten or Kindergarten Academic Intervention) with the second half of the day funded by grants or tuition. Students have scheduled time in a computer lab. Students may also be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (continued) Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Pian April 2007 Page 8 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs such as those designated as follows: English Language Learners (E L L) Self-contained Special Education Support Center Programs (SC) Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Early Childhood Education (ECE) (3-4 yr. old students with disabilities) School Adjustment (sA) Program for severely behavior -disordered students Speech & Language Therapy & Programs for Hearing Impaired students Adaptive Support Center for Mild, Moderate & Severe Disabilities (ASC -DD) Occupational & Physical Therapy Programs (OT/PT) Developmental Kindergarten In SC Programs Kindergarten Academic Intervention Program (KAI-Full Day Kindergarten) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) District Remediation Programs Education for Highly Capable Students (formerly "Gifted" Program) Some of the above special programs require specialized classroom space, as well as music and physical education classrooms, computer labs, etc.; thus, the permanent capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in these special programs and "pull-out' space must be allocated to serve these programs Some newer buildings have been constructed to accommodate most of these programs; some older buildings have been modified, and in some circumstances, these modifications reduce the classroom capacity of the buildings. When programs change, program capacity fluctuates and is updated annually to reflect the change In program and capacity. Current Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings. Reductions have been made in 7th and 10th grade English classes for Initiative 728 These standards are subject to change pending annual updates based on staff and public review for changes funded by Student Achievement Initiative 728. Class size for grades 7 - 8 should not exceed an average of 29 students. Class size for 7th & 10th grade English class should not exceed an average of 25 students. Class size for grades 9 - 12 should not exceed an average of 31 students. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (coned.) Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Apnl 2007 Page 9 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) Identified students will also be provided other education opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows: Computer, Multi -media & Technology Labs and Programs English Language Learners (E L L) Science Programs & Labs — Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Oceanography, Astronomy, Meteorology, Marine Biology, General Science, etc. Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Basic Skills Programs Child Development Preschool and Daycare Programs Music Programs — Band, Orchestra, Chorus, Jazz Band, etc. Art Programs — Painting, Design, Drawing, Ceramics, Pottery, Photography, etc. Theater Arts — Drama, Stage Tech, etc Journalism and Yearbook Classes Highly Capable (Honors or Gifted) and Advanced Placement Programs International Baccalaureate Program Night Academy — Evening classes for credit retrieval program Traffic Safety Education Transition Outreach Program for 18-21 year old Special Education students JROTC - Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps Variety of Career & Technical Education Programs (CTE -Vocational Education) Family & Consumer Science — Cooking, Sewing, Child Development, etc. Health Sciences, Sports Medicine, etc Business Education — Keyboarding, Accounting, Business Law, DECA, FBLA (Future Business Leaders), Sales & Marketing, etc Material Sciences — Woods and Cabinet Making, Metals, Welding, Electronics, Auto Shop, Manufacturing Technology, Machine Shop, CAD, (Computer-aided Design) Drafting & Drawing, etc. Culinary Arts, Graphic & Commercial Arts, Engineering, etc. Many of these programs and others require specialized classroom space which can reduce the permanent capacity of the school buildings. In addition, an alternative home school assistance, choice and transition programs are provided for students in grades K - 12 at Kent Mountain View Academy. Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 85% for secondary schools. Program capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level with adjustments for pull-out programs served in relocatables In the future, the District will continue close analysis of actual utilization Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2007 Page 10 I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 27,598 students and transitional (relocatable) capacity to house 1,412. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section I 11. Included in this Plan is an Inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity. (See Table 3 on Page 12) The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs, additional classrooms and new schools. Program capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes. It has also been updated to report new capacity for building additions at the high schools and updated program capacity for MITI Creek Middle School. Program capacity also reflects adjustments for the Student Achievement Initiative 728 reduction in class size. The class size reduction received voter approval in the Educational Programs and Operations Levy as well as through funding for Student Achievement Initiative 728 The District will conduct annual public review and update class size recommendations in accordance with the requirements and incremental funding of Student Achievement Initiative 728. Kent Mountain View Academy (formerly Kent Learning Center and Grandview Elementary) serves grades Kindergarten through 12 with transition, choice and home school assistance programs. It is located in the former Grandview School in the western part of the District In the city of SeaTac This school was originally designed as an elementary school and is included in the elementary capacity for this Plan. Calculation of Elementary, Junior High and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B and C. A map of existing schools is included on Page 13. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2007 Page 11 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS ' Changes to capacity reflect program changes and new building additions at high schools 2 Kent Junior High was closed for 2004-05 for remodel and re -purpose It re -opened in 2005 as Mill Creek Middle School s Kent Mountain View Academy serves grades K-12 The school was formerly known as Kent Learning Center 8 Grandview Elementary Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 April 2007 Page 12 2006-2007 Year SCHOOL Opened ABR ADDRESS Program Ca as ' Carnage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235 - 140th Avenue SE, Renton 98056 452 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042 402 Covington Elementary 1961 CO 17070 SE Wax Road, Covington 98042 498 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225 - 180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 456 East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 464 Emerald Park 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 504 Fanwood Elementary 1969 FW 16600 - 148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 408 George T Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98031 450 Glenndge Elementary 1996 GR 19405 - 120th Avenue SE, Renton 98056 456 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700 - 191st Place SE, Kent 98042 452 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641 - 144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 504 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915 - 186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 398 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700 -64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 464 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660 - 142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 524 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98031 474 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710 - 108th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 464 Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621 - 140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 524 Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98031 498 Neely-O'Snen Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 440 Panther Lake Elementary 1938 PL 20831 - 108th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 396 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 480 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825 - 118th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 522 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030 - 162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 504 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135 - 228th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 504 Scenic Hill Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98031 464 Soos Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 408 Spnngbrook Elementary 1969 SB 20035 - 100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 398 Sunnse Elementary 1992 SR 22300 - 132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 504 Elementary TOTAL 13,012 Cedar Heights Middle School 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 Street, Covington 98042 923 Mattson Middle School 1981 MA 16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042 804 Meeker Middle School 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 890 Mendian Middle School 1958 MJ 23480 - 120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 790 Mill Creek MS (former Kent Jr Hi) 2 2005/1952 MC 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 828 Northwood Middle School 1996 NW 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 972 Sequoia Middle School 1966 SJ 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98031 771 Middle School TOTAL 5,978 Kent-Mendian Senior High School 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98031 1,772 Kentlake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042 1,986 Kentndge Senior High School 1968 KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 2,297 Kentwood Senior High School 1981 KW 25800 - 164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 2,137 Senior High TOTAL 8,192 Kent Mountain View Academy a 1965 LC 22420 Mllltary Road, Des Moines 98198 416 DISTRICT TOTAL 27,598 ' Changes to capacity reflect program changes and new building additions at high schools 2 Kent Junior High was closed for 2004-05 for remodel and re -purpose It re -opened in 2005 as Mill Creek Middle School s Kent Mountain View Academy serves grades K-12 The school was formerly known as Kent Learning Center 8 Grandview Elementary Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 April 2007 Page 12 C r , f w ^' ;f ,f OIE a / ! { .� \� i§ p «m{ e \ c f Z 0 0�t0 �2 C \ ! Q M> 6E ! 'wo D «20�� @■o —— () 75 2 2 -i-" � O U0 U o 0/ u �u 55 !E _ � ! � C r , f w ^' ;f ,f OIE a / ! { .� \� k # q itSchool District srrC _ Facilitiesmn April 2007 Page 13 i§ p «m{ e \ \ f /. u, , C \ ! 6E ! � ,m Wt7o Ll ` \ ¥! G � � e 55 !E ! / � :f = �$\. ) » , \. k # q itSchool District srrC _ Facilitiesmn April 2007 Page 13 d p «m{ e f 21 u, , C \ ! ! \ � ,m Wt7o Ll %ƒ \ ¥! G � � k # q itSchool District srrC _ Facilitiesmn April 2007 Page 13 V Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring of 2007, the following projects are completed or in the planning phase in the District • Additions to three high schools have added capacity for students from new development and 9th Grade students moving to high schools Voters recently approved funding for additional classroom capacity to be added at Kentlake and Kent -Meridian High Schools • Reconfiguration to 7th and 8`h grades provides additional capacity at middle schools The Board has approved renovation and re -configuration of Sequoia Middle School to provide capacity for approximately 350 high school students at a new non-traditional high school, Kent Phoenix Academy in 2007-08 • Kent Junior High was temporarily closed for one year in 2004-05 for re -purpose and remodel In 2005, the school was renamed and opened in September 2005 as Mill Creek Middle School (# 7a) which also serves the 7-8 Kent Technology Academy program The voters have approved funding for Phase I I of the renovation of MITI Creek MS • In February 2006, voters approved construction funding for replacement of Panther Lake Elementary School and a future new Elementary School to accommodate new growth. • Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary and high school level Future facility and site needs are reflected in this Plan. • A new site is being acquired for replacement of Panther Lake Elem Sites for potential future schools and facilities are listed in Table 4 and shown on the site map on page 16 • Some funding is secured for purchase of additional portables and some funding may be provided by impact fees as needed. Sites are based on need for additional capacity County and city planners and decision -makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety, as well as pull- outs and turn-arounds for school buses. Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future. (See mere 4) Voter approved bond issues for $105.4M in 1990 and $130M in 1994 included funding for the purchase of eleven sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is secured for purchase of additional sites but some may be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. 2006 voter approval of $106M bond issue for capital improvement included the construction funding for a new elementary school, replacement of Panther Lake Elementary, and classroom additions to high schools Some impact fees will also be applied to those projects Student Achievement Initiative 728 funds are being utilized to reduce class size and provide extended learning opportunities. Based on community input at public hearings, the Board will continue annual review of standard of service and those decisions will be reflected in the each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2007 Page 14 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE LOCATION Type Status Protected Protected % for Completion Program new Date Capacity Growth Map I ELEMENTARY (Numbers assigned to future schools may not correlate with number of existing schools ) 13 Replacement for Panther Lake Elementary (F) SE 216th Street & 102nd Ave SE Replacement Planning 2009 500 20% Panther Lake Elementary Replaced in 2009 SE 208 Street & 108th Ave SE Replacement Planning 2009 -396 Elementary # 31 (Funded) To be determined 2 New Planning 2012 500 100% Elementary Site (Unfunded) 1 To be determined 2 Site Planning 2008 500 100% MIDDLE SCHOOL Sequoia Middle School Renovation & Reconfiguration Renovation Planning 2007 -771 for Kent Phoenix Academy SENIOR HIGH Utilized Classroom additions at three High Schools Kent-Mendian for growth & reconfiguration (Funded) Kentridge Utilized Kentwood New Non-traditional High School Former Sequoia Middle School Kent Phoenix Academy (Funded) 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent Classroom additions at Kentlake High School (F) 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent Classroom additions at Kent -Meridian HS (F) 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent TEMPORARY FACILITIES Relocatables For placement as needed SUPPORT FACILITIES Bus Facility (Unfunded)' Near Kent -Meridian High School # on Map 3 OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Additions Utilized 2004-07 388 75% Additions Utilized 2004-07 1,000 75% Additions Utilized 2004-07 896 75% Renovation Planning 2007-08 350 100% Additions Planning 2008 171 100% Additions Planning 2009 79 100% 1 So King Co Activity Center (Nike site) SE 167 & 170 SE, Renton 98058 Fntonal King County 12 South Central site (Plemmons-Yeh-Wms) SE 286th Street & 124th Ave SE, Kent paaty King County New Planning 2006+ 24- 31 each 100% New Planning TBD' N f A Land Use Type Jurisdiction 4 Covington area North (Near Mattson MS) SE 251 & 164 SE, Covington 98042 Elementary City of Covington 7 Covington area South (Scarsella) SE 290 & 156 SE, Kent 98042 Elementary King County 5 Covington area West (Halleson-Wikstrom) 15435 SE 256 Street, Covington 98042 TBD 2 City of Covington 3 Ham Lake area (Pollard) 16620 SE 240, Kent 98042 Elementary King County 8 SE of Lake Morton area (West property) SE 332 & 204 SE, Kent 98042 Secondary King County 2 Shady Lk area (Sowers, Blaine, Drahota, Parohne) 17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98058 Elementary King County 1 So King Co Activity Center (Nike site) SE 167 & 170 SE, Renton 98058 TBD' King County 12 South Central site (Plemmons-Yeh-Wms) SE 286th Street & 124th Ave SE, Kent TBD' King County Notes ' Unfunded facility needs will be reviewed to the future 2 TBD - To be determined - Some sites are acquired but placement, timing and/or configuration have not been determined 3 Numbers correspond to sites on Map on Page 16 Other site locations are parcels identified in Table 7 on Page 25 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 April 2007 Page 15 0 ® 2� ]2 2 e� ~ ®§ A® E � «J O � Z � .� 'Cr co � CIO Cid Q Q 6 � & / O � � . O 2 _ � � � 0 ® 2� ]2 2 e� ~ ®§ A® E , a «J E , 7 c ` } Cj mo L 6 & / %® \C �q . q r / , e� 3SOAVL09t � ) � .! ! \ ®C a 00 \ sm A � &} .0 _ ' \ C �0/ / _� e?-. CO G _. < 0 Kent «o mSix-Year Cap « _a_ Plan April 2007 Page Is V I Relocatable Classrooms For the purpose of clarification, the term "portables" and the more descriptively accurate term, "relocatables" are used interchangeably in this Plan. The Plan also references use of portables or relocatables as Interim or transitional capacity/facilities. Currently, the District utilizes 132 total relocatables to house students in excess of permanent capacity, for program purposes at school locations, and six for other purposes. (see Appendices A e C o) Based on enrollment projections, program capacity and funded permanent facilities, the District anticipates the need to purchase some additional relocatables during the next six-year period. The continually escalating cost of moving relocatables will increasingly limit the choice between building new relocatables on site and relocating older ones. During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District's relocatables will be replaced by permanent facilities During the useful life of some of the relocatables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these relocatables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables, or relocatables, may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Relocatables currently in use will be evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced. Quality concerns will be among those addressed by the next Community Facilities Planning Committee for review of capital facilities needs for the next bond issue. The Plan projects that the District will use relocatables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond The use of relocatables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between relocatables, emerging technologies and educational restructuring will continue to be be examined Kent School Distnct Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2007 Page 17 VII Projected Six -Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section I V, the program capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size fluctuations In Grades K - 4. As shown In the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3 on Page 12, the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts. (See Tables 5 & 5 A -B -C on pages 19 - 22) Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment count date for the year Full Time Equivalent (FTE) student enrollment for October 2006 was 25,864.47 which represents an increase of 55 FTE over the previous October. Kindergarten students are counted at .5 and P-223 FTE excludes Early Childhood Education students (ECE - preschool special education) and College -only Running Start students. (See Tables 5 & 5 A -B -C on pages 19 - 22) In October there were 589 students in 11' and 12th grade participating in the Running Start program at 9 different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. 300 of these students attended classes only at the college ("college -only") and are thus excluded from the FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District continues to be the fourth largest district in the state of Washington. P-223 Headcount for October 2006 was 26,996 with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECE and college -only Running Start students. A full headcount of all students enrolled in October 2006 totals 27,590 which includes ECE and college -only Running Start students. Based on the enrollment forecasts, current Inventory and capacity, current standard of service, relocatable capacity, and future planned additional classroom space, the District anticipates having sufficient capacity to house students over the next six years. (See Table 5 and Tables 5 A -B -C on Pages 19 - 22) This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There may be significant need for additional portables and/or new schools to accommodate growth within the District and class size reduction mandated under Student Achievement Initiative 728. Some schools, by design, may be opened with relocatables on site Boundary changes, limited movement of relocatables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and underutillzation of facilities In different parts of the District. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2007 Page 18 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT Permanent Program Capacity' 1 24,488 27,598 Changes to Permanent Capacity ' Classrooms added at 3 high schools IF) Kent -Meridian - Kenindge - Kentwood Estimated Program Capacity 2,282 27,177 27,348 27,531 27,531 27,531 Classroom additions at Kentlake & Kent-Mendian (F) 171 79 Sequoia Middle School will be renovated and reconfigured as Kent Phoenix Academy High School in 2007-08 Change to Middle School Capacity -771 4 Kent Phoenix Academy High School replaces Sequoia Middle School in 2007-08 High School Program Capacity added 350 5 Milt Creek MS Renovation - Phase 2 828 Replacement with Increased capacity for Panther Lake Elementary (Funded) -396 500 Elementary#31 (Funded) 500 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 27,598 27,177 27,348 27,531 27,531 27,531 28,031 Intenm Relocatable Capacity Elementary Reiocatable Capacity Required 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 Middle Scholl Relcealable Capacdy Required SCHOOL YEAR 2006.2007 2007-2008 1 2008-2006 1 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 1 2012-2013 0 62 Actual P R O 1 E C T E D 62 62 31 120 62 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 27,753 1 27,177 Permanent Program Capacity' 1 24,488 27,598 Changes to Permanent Capacity ' Classrooms added at 3 high schools IF) Kent -Meridian - Kenindge - Kentwood Estimated Program Capacity 2,282 27,177 27,348 27,531 27,531 27,531 Classroom additions at Kentlake & Kent-Mendian (F) 171 79 Sequoia Middle School will be renovated and reconfigured as Kent Phoenix Academy High School in 2007-08 Change to Middle School Capacity -771 4 Kent Phoenix Academy High School replaces Sequoia Middle School in 2007-08 High School Program Capacity added 350 5 Milt Creek MS Renovation - Phase 2 828 Replacement with Increased capacity for Panther Lake Elementary (Funded) -396 500 Elementary#31 (Funded) 500 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 27,598 27,177 27,348 27,531 27,531 27,531 28,031 Intenm Relocatable Capacity Elementary Reiocatable Capacity Required 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 Middle Scholl Relcealable Capacdy Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Senior High Relocatable Capacity Required 155 0 62 62 31 0 62 Total Relocatable Capacity Required1&6 155 0 62 62 31 120 62 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 27,753 1 27,177 1 27,410 1 27,593 1 27,562 1 27,651 1 28,093 TOTAL FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 2 25,864 25,949 26,347 26,618 26,773 26,976 27,224 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 1,889 1,228 1,063 975 789 675 869 I Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 FTE = Full Time Equivalent Enrollment (I a 112 day Kindergarten student = 5) 3 In Fall 2004, 9th grade moved to the high schools which provided increased capacity at Middle School level. Sequoia Middle School will be renovated and reconfigured as Kent Phoenix Academy High School In 2007-08 5 Phase I I of renovation continues for MITI Creek Middle School & Kent Technology Academy e 2006-2007 total classroom relocatable capacity is 1,412 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 April 2007 Page 19 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH - Grades 9 -12 Senior High Permanent Capacity ' 1 5,910 8,192 8,542 8,713 8,792 8,792 8,792 Changes to High School Capacity Classrooms added at three high schools (Funded) Kent-Mendian - Kentndge - Kentwood Program capacity 2,282 Kent Phoenix Academy- New Non-traditional High School added through renovation of Sequoia Middle School Estimated program capacity 350 Classroom additions at Kentlake High School (F) 171 Classroom additions at Kent-Mendian High School and KM Technology Academy' (F) 79 Subtotal 8,192 8,542 8,713 8,792 8,792 8,792 8,792 Relocatable Capacity Required ' 155 0 62 62 31 0 62 SCHOOL YEAR 2006-2007 2007-2008 1 2008-2009 1 2009-2010 1 2010-2011 1 2011-2o1z 2012-2o1s Actual P R O J E C T E D Senior High Permanent Capacity ' 1 5,910 8,192 8,542 8,713 8,792 8,792 8,792 Changes to High School Capacity Classrooms added at three high schools (Funded) Kent-Mendian - Kentndge - Kentwood Program capacity 2,282 Kent Phoenix Academy- New Non-traditional High School added through renovation of Sequoia Middle School Estimated program capacity 350 Classroom additions at Kentlake High School (F) 171 Classroom additions at Kent-Mendian High School and KM Technology Academy' (F) 79 Subtotal 8,192 8,542 8,713 8,792 8,792 8,792 8,792 Relocatable Capacity Required ' 155 0 62 62 31 0 62 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 8,347 8,542 8,775 8,854 8,823 8,792 8,854 FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 2 8,316 8,437 8,757 8,848 8,802 8,775 8,850 CAPACITY 1 31 105 18 6 Number of Relocatables Required 5 0 2 2 21 4 1 0 2 5 Classroom Relocatables required In 2007-08 Some additional Relocatables used for classroom and program purposes ' Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated penodically to reflect program changes. 2 FTE =Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment, excluding College -only Running Start students. 3 Grade level reconfiguration - All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004. 4 Sequoia Middle School will be renovated and reconfigured as a new non-traditional high school, Kent Phoenix Academy, and KM will add a new Technology Academy program in 2007-08 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Fatalities Plan Table 5 A April 2007 Page 20 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY MIDDLE SCHOOL - Grades 7 - 8 Middle School Permanent Capacity 5,150 5,978 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 Changes to Middle School Capacity ° Mill Creek Middle School - Kent Junior High re -opened as Mill Creek Middle School #7a in Fall 2005 Phase 2 of MITI Creek Renovation continues in 2007-08 Program capacity of Mill Creek MS and Kent Technology Academy 828 e Sequoia Middle School will be renovated and reconfigured as Kent Phoenix Academy High School in 2007-08 MS Capacity offline - changed to high school -771 Subtotal 5,978 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 Relocatable Capacity Required' 0 0 0 0 0 CAPACITY 183 5,207 5,207 5,207 0 0 FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 2 4,459 4,423 4,362 4,356 4,455 4,570 4,677 S (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 1 845 851 752 No Classroom Relocatables required at middle schools at this time Some Relocatables used for classroom and program purposes ' Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated penodically to reflect program changes 2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment 1 Projection 3 Grade level reconfiguration - All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004 MIII Creek Middle School & Technology Academy - Kent Junior High was renovated and re -opened in Fall 2005 with a Technology Academy serving 7th & 8th grade students from all service areas Phase I I of MIII Creek renovation continues In 2007-08 530 s Sequoia Middle School will be renovated and reconfigured as non-traditional Kent Phoenix Academy High School In 2007-08 and middle school boundaries will be reconfigured for six middle schools district -wide. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B April 2007 Page 21 SCHOOL YEAR 2006-2007 2007-2008 1 2008-2009 1 2009-2010 1 2010-2011 1 2011-2012 1 2012-2013 Actual P R O J E C T E D Middle School Permanent Capacity 5,150 5,978 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 Changes to Middle School Capacity ° Mill Creek Middle School - Kent Junior High re -opened as Mill Creek Middle School #7a in Fall 2005 Phase 2 of MITI Creek Renovation continues in 2007-08 Program capacity of Mill Creek MS and Kent Technology Academy 828 e Sequoia Middle School will be renovated and reconfigured as Kent Phoenix Academy High School in 2007-08 MS Capacity offline - changed to high school -771 Subtotal 5,978 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 Relocatable Capacity Required' 0 0 0 0 0 CAPACITY 183 5,207 5,207 5,207 0 0 FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 2 4,459 4,423 4,362 4,356 4,455 4,570 4,677 S (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 1 845 851 752 No Classroom Relocatables required at middle schools at this time Some Relocatables used for classroom and program purposes ' Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated penodically to reflect program changes 2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment 1 Projection 3 Grade level reconfiguration - All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004 MIII Creek Middle School & Technology Academy - Kent Junior High was renovated and re -opened in Fall 2005 with a Technology Academy serving 7th & 8th grade students from all service areas Phase I I of MIII Creek renovation continues In 2007-08 530 s Sequoia Middle School will be renovated and reconfigured as non-traditional Kent Phoenix Academy High School In 2007-08 and middle school boundaries will be reconfigured for six middle schools district -wide. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B April 2007 Page 21 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY - Grades K - 6 SCHOOL YEAR 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 1 2010-2011 1 2011-2012 1 2012-2013 Actual P R O 1 E C T E D Number of Relocatables Required 0 lElementary Permanent Capacity' 1 13,012 13,428 13,428 13,428 13,532 13,532 13,532 Kent Mountain View Academy 2 416 Changes to Elementary Capacity 1 Replacement with approximately 104 net increased capacity for -396 Panther Lake Elementary (Funded) 4 500 Elementary # 31 (Funded) 5 M Subtotal 13,428 13,428 13,428 13,532 13,532 13,532 14,032 Relocatable Capacity Required' 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 3 13,089 13,089 13,228 13,414 13,516 13,631 13,697 SURPLUS DEFICIT CAPACITY 339 339 200 118 16 21 335 Number of Relocatables Required 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 Classroom Relocatables required in 2011-12 Some additional Relocatables used for classroom and program purposes. ' Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and is updated periodically to reflect program changes 2 Kent Mountain View Academy is a special program at the former Grandview School serving students in Grades K - 12. The school budding (formerly Kent Learning Center & Grandview Elem ) was designed as an elementary school 3 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or Projection (Kindergarten @ 5 & excluding ECE) Kindergarten projection is at 5 FTE although most schools provide Full Day Kindergarten with alternative funding 4 Panther Lake Elementary will be replaced with Increased capacity In 2009 and built on a new site 5 Site selection and construction timing for Elementary #31 Is pending review of location and capacity needs. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 Ci April 2007 Page 22 VIII Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2007 - 2008 through 2012 - 2013 The financing components Include secured and unsecured funding and Impact fees. The plan is based on voter approval of future bond issues, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. Kent Elementary #27a, which opened in January 1999 as a replacement for the original Kent Elementary School, was the last elementary school for which the District received state matching funds under the state funding formula. Millennium Elementary #30 which opened in the fall of 2000 was the last elementary school constructed in the District. Voters approved a $69.5 million bond issue for Capital Construction and Improvements in February 2002 The bond issue partiall� funded building additions at three high schools which coincided with moving 9t grade students to the senior high in September 2004. The District received some state matching funds and has utilized Impact fees for the senior high school additions. In February 2006, voters approved a $106 million bond issue for replacement of Panther Lake Elementary School with Increased capacity to be built on a new site, construction of a new elementary school to accommodate growth, Phase H renovation for MITI Creek Middle School, and renovation of Sequoia Middle School to be reconfigured as a new non-traditional high school, Kent Phoenix Academy which will open in September 2007. Construction funding approval will also provide some additional classrooms to be constructed at Kentlake and Kent -Meridian High Schools. Some impact fees will be utilized for new construction that will increase capacity. Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary and high school level and unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future. Some funding is secured for additional portables and some will be funded from impact fees. For the Six -Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Facilities Department. Please see pages 25-26 for a summary of the cost basis Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Apnl 2007 Page 23 2 I ) \ \ ^ ) � k } k § ` �j22 % Cli t k \) ui cli ® § § § § § c \ $ to $ $ \ 0 Q J } Q -or) \ ) § § \ & § ® § \ k LL LL / LL § ® ( k ®cc� $ ® ) $ » _ _ ` | £ S 7 ; @ . § f / ) { ) \ \ ! k / ( » 2 I ! ! | , 2 m f ƒ )LU ) \ } } { \ { / ) ( / } ) { o c | o0 , 0 §) , 0 2 § : 2 _ ` $ 2 I ) \ u } 2 m ^ k } ) Cli \) cli \ 0 LL LL LL LL LL D ) $ \ ` | £ S 7 ; @ . f / ) { ) \ \ ! / » 2 I ! ! | , 2 m f ƒ )LU ) \ } } { \ { / ) ( / } ) { o c | o0 , 0 , / , 0 2 § : 2 _ ` $ / § / \ \CIL \ / } u } 2 m VIII Finance Plan - Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last elementary school, adjusted for Inflation, and projected cost of the next elementary school. Elementary School Cost Projected Cost Millennium Elementary #30 Opened in 2000 $12,182,768 Cost of Panther Lake Elementary Replacement (To open In 2009) 1 $20,802,000 Projected cost of Elementary #31 in 2012 1 $24,100,000 Construction cost of the additions to high schools: Senior High School Additions Projected Cost Total Addition to Kent -Meridian $8,300,000 Addition to Kentrid e $16,650,000 Addition to Kentwood $14,850,000 Construction cost of HS additions $39,800,000 New Non-traditional High School Kent Phoenix Academy $1,650,000 2008 Addition to Kentlake High School $5,700,000 2009 Addition to Kent -Meridian HS $2,500,000 Construction cost of new HS capacity $9,850,000 Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 on page 26 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. District Adjustment for 2007 The impact fee calculations on pages 28 and 29 include a "District Adjustment" which Is equal to the amount of increase that the Impact fee formulas drive out for this year and adjusted for increase in the Consumer Price Index Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2007 Page 25 a m O! 0 LO ASqLO y ¢ N r dCq y LOO 0) vi« Q a CO £ O 69 01 69 y p Wg v = y �se. co O CO M r CO a L+ acoo. coO, r O sf coN Co 0 M N W N � O ~ coO E9 co d0' 69 CO .M- 69 69 r W 69 W. 69 a O O co CCpp CD N N p 8 y A .r- 9 O O r co O O O N r a r r O O O M M M Or M O � N N U) 0 O W K M U) M M U 'C CO O 69 6-T 69 69 69 O b9 669 669 609 69 OOco 7 n M M r p g M m LO a Oi (D CA � N , O1 M 0 to � O a W (D M CD co H � y m p o D V y J Y W y O y y E m !•V a a .L.- o .L. iQi y r N U i W y N n N N N CWq y oo Y o p S o $ m o V W N } CL GO 8 Lt O N N N 5 O N Ma d a5 o, U m$, O y > m H Y $ i a CD S 3 o x c m a y$ C 5 1. c E nr C d O N N + t N C y Y C c N O m y C Y 'p @ •-• N O U N a d _ m = a C E E 0 Y d `° p `o c o a z o c Z Y 6 '� C O 2 c d (A _ E m m g u e o L � N a mom t C o N W E 7 S [n 2 O D $ m 0 C 0 ti Z W Y U CA N CA n Qc a m d Y d y c U Y '6 C E " g C O f0 L O U 5 E 5O D W £ t L E S CQ « C U 2 N y N c a Z g y° Y Y Y (A 2 iq rn 0 a z It� r U r tp W r N Y t7 A m N KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors - Single Family x Elementary (Grades K - 6) 0.444 x Middle School (Grades 7 - 8) 0.148 x Senior High (Grades 9 - 12) 0 252 x Total 0 844 Projected Increased Student Capacity x Elementary 500 x Middle School 1,065 x Senior High 2,882 Required Site Acreage per Facility x Elementary (required) 11 x Middle School (required) 21 x Senior High (required) 32 New Facility Construction Cost x Elementary' $24,100,000 x Middle School $0 x Senior High " $9,850,000 See cost basis on Pg 26 Temporary Facility Square Footage x Elementary 71,652 x Middle School 27,000 x Senior High 20,272 x Total 4% 118,924 Permanent Facility Square Footage x Elementary 1,475,936 x Middle School 651,273 x Senior High 1,007,522 x Total 96% 3,134,731 Total Facilities Square Footage x Elementary 1,547,588 x Middle School 678,273 x Senior High 1,027,794 x Total 3,253,655 Developer Provided Sites / Facilities Value 0 Dwelling Units 0 Student Generation Factors - Multi -Family Elementary 0.293 Middle School 0.058 Senior High 0.094 Total 0.445 OSPI - Square Footage per Student Elementary 90 Middle School 117 Senior High 130 Special Education 144 Average Site Cost I Acre Elementary $468,750 Middle School $52,563 Senior High $93,955 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost Elementary @ 24 $106,700 Middle School @ 29 $0 Senior High @ 31 $106,700 State Match Credit Current State Match Percentage 5594% Area Cost Allowance ACA - Cost/Sq. Ft. Area Cost Allowance (Effective July 07) $16243 District Average Assessed Value Single Family Residence $282,605 District Average Assessed Value Multi -Family Residence $89,689 Capital Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 Current / $1,000 Tax Rate $1.28 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Current Bond Interest Rate 4.08% Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2007 Page 27 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula ((Acres x Cost per Acre) I Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage I Average Site Cost/Acre I Fatality Capacity ( Student Factor $24,87734 A 1 (Elementary) 11 $468,75D 500 0 444 $4,57875 A 2 (Middle School) 21 $0 1,065 0 148 $0 A 3 (Senior High) 32 $0 1,000 0 252 $0 0 844 A —> $4,57875 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanentrrotal Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Fatality Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary) $24,100,000 500 0 444 096 $20,54477 B 2 (Middle School) $0 1,065 0 148 096 $0 B 3 (Senior High) $9,850,000 550 0252 096 $4,33257 0 844 B —> $24,87734 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence Formula ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Fataidy Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $106,700 24 0 444 004 $7896 C 2 (Middle School) $0 29 0 148 004 $0 C 3 (Senior High) $`106,700 31 0252 004 $3469 0 844 C —> $11365 State Match Credit per Single Family Residence Formula Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feel per student x District Match % x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance SPI Sq Fl ! Student I District Match % Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $162 43 90 0.5594 0 444 $3,63()90 D2 (Middle School) $16243 117 0 0 148 $0 D 3 (Senior High) $16243 130 05594 0 252 $2,97668 D —> $6,60758 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value $282,605 Current Capital Levy Rate / $1,000 $1 28 Current Bond Interest Rate 408% Years Amortized (10 Years) 10 TC —a $2,92925 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility/ Site Value I Dwelling Units 0 0 FC —> 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $4.57875 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $24,87734 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $11365 Subtotal $29,56974 D = State Match Credit per Residence $6,60758 TC = Tax Credit per Residence $2,92926 Subtotal $9,53684 Total Unfunded Need $20,03289 50% Developer Fee Obligation $10,016 FC = Facility Credit (if applicable) 0 District Adjustment (See Page 25 for explanation) ($4,906) Net Fee Obligation per Single Family Residence 1 $5,110 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2007 Page 28 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor State Match Credit per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x District Match % x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance I SPI Sq Ft / Student I Required Site Acreage I Average Site Cost%Acre I Facility Capauty I Student Factor 05594 A 1 (Elementary) 11 $468,750 500 0 293 $3,021 56 A 2 (Middle School) 21 $0 1,065 0 058 $0 A 3 (Senior High) 32 $0 1,000 0 094 $0 Average MF Residential Assessed Value $89,689 0 445 $1 28 Current Bond Interest Rate 408% A b $3,02156 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit TC —> $92965 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Formula ((Facility Cost I Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent I Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary) $24,100,000 500 0 293 096 $13,55770 B 2 (Middle School) $0 1,065 0 058 096 $0 B 3 (Senior High) $9,850,000 550 0094 095 $1,61612 0445 B c* $15,17381 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Rabo) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $106,700 24 0 293 004 $52.11 C 2 (Middle School) $0 29 0 058 0.04 $0 C 3 (Senior High) $106,700 31 0 094 0.04 $1294 0.445 C b $6505 State Match Credit per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x District Match % x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance I SPI Sq Ft / Student I District Match % Student Factor I $15,17381 D 1 (Elementary) $16243 90 05594 0 293 $2,39607 D 2 (Middle School) $16243 117 0 0 058 $0 D 3 (Senior High) $16243 130 05594 0 094 $1,11035 D b $3,50642 Tax Credit per Multi -Family Residence Unit Average MF Residential Assessed Value $89,689 Current Capital Levy Rate / $1,000 $1 28 Current Bond Interest Rate 408% Years Amortized (10 Years) 10 TC —> $92965 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC—> 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per Multi -Family Unit $3,02156 B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $15,17381 C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $6505 Subtotal $18,260.42 D = State Match Credit per MF Unit $3,50642 TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit $92965 Subtotal $4,43606 Total Unfunded Need $13,82436 50% Developer Fee Obligation $6,912 FC = Facility Credit (if applicable) 0 District Ad)ustmenl (See Page 25 for explanation) ($3,766) Net Fee Obligabon per Multi -Family Residence Unit 1 $3,146 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2007 Page 29 IX Summary of Changes to April 2006 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the April 2006 Plan are summarized here. Voters approved funding for replacement and expansion of Panther Lake Elementary School on a new site, a future new elementary school, classroom additions at high schools to accommodate new growth, renovation of Sequoia Middle School to be reconfigured as a new non-traditional high school named Kent Phoenix Academy and Phase II of the renovation at MITI Creek Middle School. Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in class size as welt as program changes Reduction in class size for Student Achievement Initiative 728 is reflected in this update. Changes in relocatables (portables) or transitional capacity reflect use, purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement between facilities. The student enrollment forecast is updated annually. At this time, enrollment projections continue to reflect need for future additional capacity at the elementary and high school level. The district expects to receive state matching funds for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded site and facility needs will be reviewed in the future. Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors include: Grade/Typel FROM I TO udent Generation Factor Elem 0444 0 444 No change this year Single Family (SF) Ms 0148 0 148 No change this year Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SH 0 252 0 252 No change this year AV - Average of Condominiums & Apts. Total 0 844 0 844 Per Puget Sound ESD :udent Generation Factor Elem 0 293 0 293 No change this year Multi -Family (MF) MS 0 058 0 058 No change this year Impact Fee - Single Family SH 0 094 0 094 No change this year Impact Fee - Multi -Family Total 0 445 0 445 Change to fee + $112 State Match Credit 5594% 5594% No change per OSPI Website Area Cost Allowance (former Boeckh Index) $154.22 $16243 Per OSPI Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SF $263,362 $282,505 Per Puget Sound ESD AV - Average of Condominiums & Apts. MF $82,971 $89,689 Per Puget Sound ESD Debt Service Capital Levy Rate / $1000 $174 $128 Per King Co Assessor Report General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 439% 408% Market Rate Impact Fee - Single Family SF $4,928 $5,110 Change to fee + $182 Impact Fee - Multi -Family MF $3,034 $3,146 Change to fee + $112 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2007 Page 30 X Appendixes Appendix A: Calculations of Capacities for Elementary Schools Appendix B: Calculations of Capacities for Middle Schools Appendix C: Calculations of Capacities for Senior High Schools Appendix D: Use of Relocatables Appendix E: Student Generation Factor Survey Kent School Dlstnct Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Apnl 2007 Page 31 z z W J O w z W Z O QU Q W a c m W L- LL N W Ln �maJ: L Q o U Z O J ULU � co G w J z W U Z fn Z Y U qa a U w CL W U LU W N O O pp pp p p tO p pp p o S p 2 O p p p p p p M i0 S fN' N N S O ttpD O O O �O N 8 m N O O O O N Ov O O O O O O N 1 O N 8 Ov O N 0 0 0 O N O p O O 1c O O O .- N 0 0 0 0 0 0- N O- < N O LO O O O N O - 0 0 0 O I N N . 7 M N M , N , M 0 N 0 - O M O N N N M , O M M N M O I C � O OJ N 1 8 O Y) h OOi t0 N v v N w OV W W N O O tp O Q N O N `° m O Ri O o 0 o Ri o Ri Ri Ri w 2 N w R, 9 T 0 o o 9 o A o N O N N � N M W d 7 N N O n M N M M N M A * - N 0 Y N N M m 0 o m e W I N p .A-� N .n- M O1 m N 0 � N O � N O 10 �O M N N N A .A- .N- I fV N w w o { W U i' a p s f 3 m m m U U U c3 = Z Z g a m mco y E W r E E w m d y m o m w o u E d y E m `m o _ W y� c9i me Qw O 3 ryy Up d E m d v N d C O w C C d C m C m d C m V O O C U U ti U ui w um. C7 C7 C7 = M Y i i M z a a as �n v� �n N .n' �4 0 z W CL z Z a8 LLJ e m J I W J 0 ry tV LU 0 tC W N p W p p p p F o c N � M 1fJ � a LU Z v d W 7 W = �pppp U EE 4 C R y � m y u1 O O fD O O O tq 0 N H N U Y � O t� U � 1 d E Wo m o M o o M J a0 a m a Ln G L) Z O N e 6 o N m m gy� K pp N �y W 8 a v tp Onl � ON! pp v01! F U� .- fC4 fV � ♦ o L a M "� X '@ E Z' O Is m V N U ❑ a $ N W O� X a o k0 N M a W Oi k Q _; U)a U $ y d (L -19 U Z fn — •N- N w` W W a U fi .^- w LLI d ryry U a Q � N IL n w u'i U a0 N n m tp cp M N SLM p ¢a OI N 2 q� M O ci r !D f0 ^ O O W N W Q. # y M N N lh l7 N r N m 1 U W U v E f L O o F- N W 2 O O Cl) $ 3 .� g � c o � R' rn o O i (n N y T o ) c Q U_ QQ N W 8 0 A E z c0 V Y p C O Y Y Y Y Q ad m Q N V C JQL O �s m 0 ry tV fV tC W N = W p p p p c c N � M 1fJ � 10 9 iJ d W W �pppp U 39m N tq 0 N V Yf O t� U � d E � O m a tp Onl � ON! pp v01! .- fC4 fV � ♦ o L a M "� m V N U X k0 N M n W Oi U) a U $ d (L -19 •N- N W W a U fi .^- w ryry U a � N n w u'i U a0 N n m tp cp M N SLM p OI 2 q� M O mq � W C5n d N m m o F- 2 � c o � Y w m m 2 y „f0„ v a U_ N W 8 0 A E z c0 Y 2D Z C O Y Y Y Y Q ad m Q N V C JQL O \ ) v � k 0 0 § m w �d CO) § « U 0 uj LU D � 7 ) 2 a ) ° © ° ° N _ N ( ! ; / 0 ) ; ; ■ § c • © ! / / 0 0 2 ■ e ! 7 � $ � � ■ ) S ) / ; S ƒ / \ , _ / ,LL . ~ � ! $ \ ! ! # ' kRe 2 ! § ] k (D to ( 5 \ $ ) ( \ 4 I \ \ / = § 7 \ ! { - \ \ « 2 2 \ f § co I \ 2 / , ! ( \ k / 3 \ _ § a) \ / f \ /) = « } § � 7 ) 2 T 7 0 U co LL C O N cmcm N c d 0 Z w a a a A CL y d LL b m } N N O W C Y O V O N C� N f7 N pN N aND N N GO M O M GO N phi N 00 O oMo C7 sN� t'q r r M <O M M M O N .N} M V O N to N tN0 r O N ON1 O Ln N 0 U LL C (n O O V N r N O M r (O N M N ^ 01 ^ O) N �-• O N N N O O V N 1^ fD r M O r M ` m O O N M M m r O N N N GNO O O N O r r tn O co V r N N C N N ONi m rD l GO f� NV N �D mV N t0 So1 7 n irrJ < O O ON N Y7 N M a1�0 O� aD t l G a m N N N tD o7 1 (� N N co H r O r r r O O O r O O O r r O O O N r r r O O O O O G n O r M 0 r Cl)N r O v r M O N aa h MOM M M N O V O M O N V r M w N N O V N C) co N N M V y C N VILDOO N N C r fO+1 N NLO In d LO CD (D 7 N W N O ^ m N (NO O to r Y �f) N N a0 (^O V f00 f0 n O) r .- � O M tO fD N N N a0 V N N r r N W a O r co H D N N r 1lj N r n N r N r O V N r r r N r r O R M Z 'S E Q J O N W O U UU 2 J U r6 Z y N LU v � c VJ d F�- � 3 � E c0 y 3 m @ W c d Q • co LL Q% C Np a } 0 JJ�ll V r @ cgO a' Its- @ v 0 O @ v @ N w ( C U �cQ N O E w d @ O W W O � @ O x o a O) x y � O O x y N y� (J @ a � Y .99 5 @ Y @ i 3 N @ N @ a z yy d c N r y d O z O @ d o Z ob N a 15 @ ami - a o+ c d i9 N w OCE -pp L W g O rn N d c w @ {p .�+ N E S N U) 6 E m O @ a. .Y tWI O U 8 O 3 yp O 3¢ w m m 0 Z w a a a A CL y d LL b m } N N O W C Y LO z \� � R q E 0 0 I 0 Cl) R z � m 7 z } � § mt § § \ 7 ® » } S o / ) 2 0 0 ; 0 0 \ 0 § ; k o;§ o 0 o ) ) \! E a)V$% ;= 0 0, 2to 0 0= 7 k 0 « 4 CNk)) b't q 2 e 0 0 0 C140,_ § ; ; - ; e a 'T § \ § N , , _ m ® K \{ a G� m a a! 2 / It e » ■ § g § e § )® § q q c § G ; m 2 Cl) � E S a I!+} a 3 _ LU/ $ e ! 3 E \ G J \ f i £ / k \ > 7 = \ f D 2 ` m ) k ) E \ ] ) f ) ` \ ± \ ) E ` / 2 \ c _ \ \ ( co! \ 7 z } � § Federal Way Public Schools Capital Facilities Plan Building for the Future FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BOARD OF EDUCATION Ed Barney Evelyn Castellar David Larson Charles Hoff Thomas Madden SUPERINTENDENT Thomas R. Murphy FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ii INTRODUCTION iii -iv SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction Inventory of Educational Facilities 2 Inventory of Non -Instructional Facilities 3 Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities 4 Needs Forecast - New Facilities 5 Six Year Finance Plan 6 SECTION 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Introduction 7 Map - Elementary Boundaries 8 Map - Middle school Boundaries 9 Map - Senior High Boundaries 10 SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction Building Capacities 12-13 Portable Locations 14-15 Student Forecast 16-18 Capacity Summaries 19-23 King County Impact Fee Calculations 24-26 SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2007 27-29 PLAN ii FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, City of Kent Ordinance No 3260 effective March 1996, and the City of Auburn Ordinance No 5078 effective 1998, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 2007 Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2007 This Plan is scheduled for adoption by King County, the City of Kent, City of Federal Way and the City of Auburn and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing. fobs, services, culture and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies The District has prepared a multi phase plan for the renovation and construction of Federal Way Schools and support buildings. Phase 1, a $245 million bond was presented to the voters in February 2006. This received a 54% yes vote, unfortunately not enough to pass The School Board presented a restructured bond of $149 million for adoption in November This received a 59 5% approval from voters, still unfortunately not enough to pass The Board authorized presenting the $149 million bond again on May 15, 2007 The bond, passed at 63 93%, will replace four elementary schools, Lakeland, Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla and one middle school Lakota. Capacity increases are planned at all four elementary schools. Plans to replace Federal Way High School and increase capacity by approximately 800 students have been delayed Federal Way High School was built in 1938 It has been added onto at least 10 times and currently has an almost maze -like layout. Based on an annual 4% increase in construction cost, the estimated cost to rebuild is $122 million. The reconstruction would increase the capacity of the high school by 800 students, or by about 33% None of the cost to replace Federal Way is included in the Impact Fee calculation in this Plan Because of continued construction inflation, estimated construction costs will be re- calculated prior to the next bond election iii FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The non -instructional projects included in the plan will consolidate support services operations at a single location The current Transportation and Maintenance facility cannot continue to meet the District needs in the future Nutrition services and other administrative functions will also relocate to this centralized location. The Board approved a pilot program at one elementary school to offer Kindergarten through 8`" grade instructional configuration. The program will begin at one elementary school in September 2007 by adding a sixth grade class As the program grows, there will be more information available about the unique facility needs for this grade configuration. Minor boundary changes are planned for the 2007/08 school years at the elementary level to adjust for the fluctuating enrollment. Most of the growth in the Federal t,'i'ay School District area has been on the east side of the district in unincorporated King County Increases of elementary capacity and boundary changes will mitigate space requirements for students moving into this new housing iv FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools A Financial Plan which shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization listed follows this. 1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Adelaide 1635 SW 304th Street Federal Way 98023 Brigadoon 3601 SW 336th Street Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 298th Street Auburn 98001 Enterprise 35101 5th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Green Gables 32607 47th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lake Grove 303 SW 308th Street Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35827 32nd Avenue S Auburn 98001 Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Road Federal Way 98003 Meredith Hill 5830 S 300th Street Aubuin 98001 Mirror Lake 625 S 314th Street Federal Way 98003 Nautilus 1000 S 289th Street Federal Way 98003 Olympic View 2626 SW 327th Street Federal Way 98023 Panther Lake 34424 1 st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368th Street Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 34600 12th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Silver Lake 1310 SW 325th Place Federal Way 98023 Star Lake 4014 S 270th Street Kent 98032 Sunnycrest 24629 42nd Avenue S Kent 98032 Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42nd Avenue S Auburn 98001 Wildwood 2405 S 300th Street Federal Way 98003 Woodmont 26454 16th Avenue S. Des Moines 98198 MIDDLE SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Academy 34620 9`h Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Illahee 36001 1 st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Kilo 4400 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 314th Street Federal Way 98023 SacaJawea 1101 S Dash Point Road Federal Way 98003 Saghalie 33914 19th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Sequoyah 3450 S 360`h ST Auburn 98001 Totem 26630 40`h Ave S Kent 98032 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Decatur 2800 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 30611 16th Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288th Street Auburn 98001 Todd Bearner 35999 16th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Harry S Truman 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS Merit School 36001 151 Ave S Federal Way 98003 LEASED SPACES Internet Academy 32020 1st Ave S Federal Way 98003 2 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CURRENT INVENTORY NON -INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Developed Property Administrative Building MOT Site Central Kitchen Federal Way Memorial Field Leased Space Community Resource Center Available Office Space Undeveloped Property 31405 l8th Avenue S Federal Way 98003 1066 S 320th Street Federal Way 98003 1344 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 1300 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 1813 S Commons Federal Way 98003 30819 14`h Ave S Federal Way 98003 Site # I Location 75 SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW — 9.2 Acres 65 S 351 st Street & 52nd Avenue S — 8 8 Acres 60 E of 10th Avenue SW - SW 334th & SW 335th Streets - 10.04 Acres 73 N of SW 320'hand east of 45`h PL SW — 23 45 Acres 71 S 344th Street & 46th Avenue S - 17.47 Acres 82 151 Way S and S 342"d St — Minimal acreage 74 3737S360 th St - 47 13 Acres (Part of this site is being used for Sequoyah Middle School) 96 S 308th St and 14th Ave S —.36 Acres 81 S332 "d St and 9`h Ave S — 20 Acres Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District 3 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS Purchase and Relocate Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is Portables Impact Fees Elementary Schools: Replace Existing Buildings Voter approved bonds Lakeland, Panther Lake, Increase capacity at Lakeland, Sunnycrest and Valhalla Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla by a total of 200 seats Lakota Middle School Replace Existing Building Voter approved bonds Federal Way High School Replace Existing Building, Future bond authorization Increase Ca acct y Decatur High School Increase Capacity Future bond authorization. The District is also planning the replacement of some non -instructional facilities The District has purchased 20 acres (Site #81) for construction of consolidated facilities for support services functions Transportation, Nutrition Services, Maintenance and other non -instructional functions will be housed at this centralized location As part of the multi phase plan, the District intends to increase capacity for high school students with expansion at the Decatur High School site. Increased capacity at Federal Way High and at Decatur High supplant the need for construction of a fifth comprehensive high school. 4 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST - NEW FACILITIES NEW F4CILITY LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS No current plans for new facilities. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Six Year Finance Plan Secured Funding Projected Revenue Actual and Planned Expenditures Sources urrent and Impact Fec„ (1 466,443 Land Sale Funds (2) 395 439 Bond Funds (3) 4 545 439 Slat, Match (41 2 426 365 IOIAI $7,833,686 Source+ 2010/11 Stat, N1at,h(51 $20 000 b00 Bond or 1 eco f unds (6) $86 50C 000 Land fu n3 Saks (7) $14 000 000 lm actI ,,(8) 3440000 TOTAL $100,500,000 NEWS H L urrent and Budget 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total ota ost Prior Years 211(17108 21108/09 2009110 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013,14 2007-2013 MODERNIZATION A1,OEaPANS1ON Valhalla El,muftap $7570000 $9930,000 $175000W $17,500,000 Panther Lek, Elwucnt fry $7570000 $99:0000 $1750(0/x) $17,S017,000 Lak,l a J t luucota-, $7 570 000 $9 430 OW $17 5uC 000 $17,5(8),000 Suin)awt Eluncn arp $7570000 $9936 OW $175000(X, $17,900,01m) I akota Middle School $15301250 $15038750 136faenn $340000((1 $34,000,0(I1) 71'MPORARV FACILI I ILS portables (9) $986,946 $356 946 $3K 646 $1,373,892 f01AI $986,946 515,526,946 $50,361,250 $34,898,750 $3,600,000 So $0 411 $104,386,946 SI05373,892 NOTFS 1 1 he,e foes art wrrcnip berry held in a King Couniv Clv of Federal W as and ( its of Kent impact fee account, and will be ars l able for use Its the Darrel forsrstcm improvements This is v ear end balance on 1131/116 2 The,, funds come from v mous sales of land and are set aside for estmtated espend it ores This is rear end belfries on I2 31106 1 1 hu is me 12,31,(16 balana, of bond f unds Thu figure includes interest ammg, 4 Thar, s late marohfng funds recened for Todd Beamer High School Truman High School andthe ad diners to existing buildings This is a r ear end be once on 12,31/0( 5 This is on ump.lcd Smie Maicn for prge,ts attached to future bond issues This is based on Jul) 12006 State Match radices o These are anticipated bond funds borers have approved a band for $149m 7 PiGaccied sale ofsurplu_ port ,mes X These are pro)eued fees bared upon known reofdenbal developments in the Disartct over the next six )ears This figure assumes SSO UW per month for the next sisvem u These fees represent the cost of purchasing and installing new portables FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 2 - MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools (the District) has twenty-two elementary schools (grades K-5), seven middle school schools (grades 6-8), five senior high schools (grades 09-12), one school serving K-6 and one school serving students in grades 6 -10 for the 2007/08 school year The Internet Academy serves grades K-12 The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school, by school type (Harry S. Truman High School, Merit School, Internet Academy and Federal Way Public Academy serve students from throughout the District). The identified boundaries are reviewed annually. Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs that affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments In the case of most public facilities, new development has its mayor impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development School Districts are different. If the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not dust one school. It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not dust around a single development. 7 Federal Way Public Schools ELEMENTARY SCHtldL! MIDDLH SCHOOLS as { bn"NqM �+ U 7 ]3 :.yCi'dbN -.,- �„ ;� a� F T"' a Glv I, A ! 3a 3iC1h9IN C P r" O 4z.e Nos{cM R.g 31 felw" 43 '! t.+m tiM,v O€. }g vr&,4i Way P.w a>v a...of E 6 MWe �m,ao ii iU=zrxc+•ri mlt d'a SENIOR HIGH SCHOO" :l IT t4e1;1111 f:6 Cadr hr•. I r j -- �+ �' -t�-�. ! Ll x•ga�PEC N.m. 4`./ L ;� .f c ��Wy j tx ,44r lAb. Q.� ifl OiXdfur .5 w!`i'•Yx- • i^. tid+n,a S vn C fY ya faiarnl Wy L t � f =T t .g 3a 7•-•w•m-•ea tu. .i Gb q Te.;m,+x .}aflarsa� Gs: a � _ f aa.a-. `^^ .j _ _� e i 41, d a= ffiw La•� y ] #9 f n Y Trunun 4'-c, _ Tr* ,,, i' . r Y•r 1*11,L nsa4 mx y f- � i ss FU smnt.arw5 tUi 3 f �- 17 Adtlww.a F - Y,.U•+e k�clx+W Sar. ° ._3 � �J � ,y 1 � '�s II Alx mons F 5 $ufLFO%5aex yi ""'�.,�'i 21 ,�• ,+ 1 if f�ri*aiMiuuM $rwceGtKe* fm . r ta.-.> *�, OS MamiernMn Rpaegk6r�Yrvx!•ywRru+,e E� - COAs i .�� e" ,, l . _ .n 1 FEDERAL WA W.75H/NGT01.` and V!C!NlTY y' i � iab1, A5 £ �7 r°S,.�j L� ��..I —t 'j rt�.... k`� � � � ,'M 3 • y- [13 7,'�F�2Ji le 77 - ' �t � ' t x S S " {" `i +� �..i(� a � � t � _ ..� 3 } r f `f � � �,--s-..• w,. � r � ' ;� Federal Way Public Schools i1r•ti � „ i c + � £�' rI MIDDLE SCHOOL BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools a _ ELEMENTAR76CN0048 MIOOLE SCHOOLS Coda C.dr 1 CA hd+a,. �a CL W tamrs. - �+ rt ,s _ 2 Nhgua ns 04 31 Ktn 1 3 knl G $ 32 Ld+Sfa OAF f.� y✓ r ^4� .;,_..�. ( ,y. • Lrd' w"'w 05 33 s Greer G4bhos A 2 3a `a w-.110 6n Tkutiptt 6 6 35 Tpw.n 9 3� 3 wake 3rw4 Ga 3{ fntvmWAYF4 Aa d' CA ; ,.ti _ y�'t t` in t 5 Nmt 7wa�Y't F^t 16 N9, re0lh Isar xd SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 11 Nisar LAip 64 ,x NWkc ,.w Ei 2 i�� _• G�� i n On�tptcuw Ce Cod..�m ., a ! 1.1 pnies',e+Lake �A 40 LAYIu: F'A' 16 yLa.� 0 f, i � YYay C S �ca+l Forwe �! 42 Th.-,,. lettero"w fj.0 r -`'�� v Sdrur r-voa 07 JS Thdd 3.1me1 itl &tom+l+a �° G3 49 Harry5 7runxn YR 20 T.11 Limos R4 1 law` IVa G -t .2 wtda4 d F-0 23 W.x"ammK F3 swiN.,a Saaa tlt flus g(ioeyl SU.rr> LarAw Pas 'i <• a t AS#�rkena�*cn,.:lwcttawrm-lrrr�ck�.+Whur E-6 - Cale y ��, .. 114 Parks .+. Yj [ k' i hEOEAAL WAY WASHINGTON Jnd WC2NY'Y �e5 1-7, LO k Y,. - $.` l y+n `"- ~�F 777 . f i - t1'-Ntii t Y ' t 2 Yah' _ l�Ji e t � _ i •� 1 i Nal �Yli-.x Z 'Y toyy .. _ W E A .,�, ww. en unrA cn•e..r .y' � RI � - , t - i I � i .� � ( , � ✓. A �_.. Federal Way Public Schools e 1-1mlv y�E Ye n HIGH SCHOOL BOUNDARiES * Federal Way Public Schools ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS MIROIE iCNOOLf t. -.r.. _ t ` Cs 21 L-ASa�lr�:a C0 8 1 CSWS G1'+t<to1 tla^M- TWa � QF.i_a f� -v- 4 -+ 09 13 4"A'..4A �3 9� C..•e_n i:zr.-ma A7 3{ 1aalro 3 i.eo r:4.. nfl GA 35 10i.m a] - • _ >_�+�. " 7 t.u)c rim. G6 Yi Fara+rm Way Pr t*' ACamasuy L4 & anrms Q G B - fi r• .,.;n C �� Y M5 * rbd.ti P4 - — -' I to iuum ar<a Ed SENIOR MtGN SCHOOLS ! t, t1 a,.,xar 1, -bra vrr, 1 r# PIIJ�' LAOE-A q0 G ame £t �• iA Nireur Y4 FSO 61 Iw.WW., E5 �•- "'`?rK [" IG 8r r.rsru t i.xoux D 17 �i,at E.aba DT aS iv•" Ure.mrm Es •'( Vl P.ia� akx fry -3 �y _ ( { toy Tv.m ; . &-i •r �4- - _ n 22 "N ew". j F a F.nww &aMtfl a6iLl -- ) o Tl W.<4Jd,xan F354. 4y ufi Karnier an..a-.:Y+a•,t'f.r� tr,van E.6 .. COQin• - � r�J� ['�� ' } - r • � _ '" 41 Vw' ;»3r •.:: y*r'*>3 €a§�'4-k^iP,, ya. b / FFi'�,f.' ��s _ S FEDERAL WAY WASHIHGIU ,,d bl£LYfY' � �T• � �"" �r -L-�`- r�� = •Y r _ 'I- ¢kd€a. -„ " #3,1' r ` .I—•� ` - c r Zg4�r 4 sf . a r � _� 1 J � S �['jj` s �.��Ti '`-s r �; 1 +5"� 't. _� ( 1 r>� �, �T r-j�✓• � �� =�f j _ ' r RtT � 4"" tea- j�`#�� t'„r} ,p :1y _ ya�y,i�.� is t�j�.'! a R, l� -j ft (•- �� b,... 493 y W- 7'41- L�� mt e� 1` _ _� � 1T�\ � ' f /• r I Y F r. � e"�` Federal Way Public Schools FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities - The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast — 2008 through 2014 Capacity Summaries King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi Family Units 004 FEDERAL WAY PIiBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Building Capacities This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs In general, the District's current target class size provides that the average class size for a standard classroom for grades K through 2 should be 20 students For grades 3-5 the target is 25 students For grades six to 12 the target class size is 26 students. Classrooms for students with Individualized Education Program (Special Education) needs are calculated at 12 seats per classroom. Using the OSPI square footage calculation as a base line, the District has calculated a program capacity for all schools. The following list clarifies the adjustments to the OSPI calculation Music Rooms: Each elementary school requires a standard classroom for music instruction. All Day Kindergarten: Every elementary school operates at least one all day Kindergarten program. These all day Kindergarten program require additional capacity because the standard classroom is available for one all day session rather than two half day sessions. The District will operate 39 sections of all day Kindergarten in 2007/08. Special Education Resource Rooms: Each elementary and middle school requires the use standard classroom(s) for special education students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities English as a Second Language Programs: Each elementary, middle school and high school requires the use of standard classroom for students learning English as a second language Middle School Computer Labs: Each middle school has at least one computer lab. High School Career Development and Learning Center (Resource) Room: Each high school provides special education resource room and career development classrooms for students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. 12 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITIES ELEMENTARY BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name HeadcOLmt FTE Adelaide 349 349 Brigadoon 312 312 Camelot 254 254 Enterprise 443 443 Green Gables 474 474 Lake Dolloff 395 395 Lake Grove 344 344 Lakeland 377 377 Mark Twain 321 321 Meredith Hill 475 475 Mirror Lake 371 371 Nautilus 353 Olympic View 333 333 Panther Lake 422 422 Rainier View 429 429 Sherwood Forest Silver Lake 421 421 Star Lake 367 367 Sunnycrest 354 354 Twin Lakes 308 308 Valhalla 352 352 Wildwood 286 286 W oodmont 347 347 12007 101 AL 8,495 OSPI Elementary Calculation 11,339 jElernentary Average 369 1 36 Notes. * Federal Way Public Academy capacity is not used in calculated average • Truman High School capacity is not used in calculated average 13 MIDDLE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount FTE lllahee 890 899 Kilo 908 917 Lakota 827 835 SacaJawea 735 742 Saghahe 849 858 Sequoyah 601 607 Totem 751 759 Federal Way Public Academy 199 201 2007 TOTAL 5,760 5,818 OSP/ Middle SchoolCalculation 6,327 J�Middle School Average SENIOR HIGH BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount FTE Decatur 1306 1,382 Federal Way 1405 1,487 Thomas Jefferson 1386 1,467 Todd Beamer 1121 1,186 Truman High School 290 307 Federal Way Public Academy 133 141 2007TOTAL 59641 5,969 OSPI High School Calculation 5,948 *Senior High Average 1 1,305 1 1,380 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount FTE Merit School 16 16 2006 TOTAL 16 1 16 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLATY Portable Locations The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not an efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students when increasing population impacts a school attendance area Portables may also be required to house students when new or changing programs require additional capacity. They also provide temporary housing for students until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables It is the practice and philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that portables are not acceptable as permanent facilities The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for temporary educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools 14 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS PORTABLESLOCATED PORTABLESLOCATED AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS AT SENIOR HIGHS PORTABLES LOCATED AT MIDDLE SCHOOLS INSI RI CI I ONA I NON INSI RUCTIONAL Adelaide 3 3 Brigadoon 1 1 Camelot 3 ] Enterprise 3 Green Gables 1 Lake Dolloff 1 1 Lake Grove 2 1 Lakeland 2 4 Mark Twain 3 Meredith Hill 2 1 Mirror Lake 3 1 Nautilus 1 Olympic View Panther Lake 3 Rainier View 2 1 Sherwood Forest 4 Silver Lake 4 Star Lake 2 2 Sunnycrest 1 I Twin Lakes 2 1 Valhalla 1 1 Wildwood 4 0o mont M I'AL 49 Tr— PORTABLES LOCATED AT MIDDLE SCHOOLS 15 INSTRUCTIONAL NON 1NSI RUCTIONAL Illahee Federal Way 3 Kilo 6 1 Lakota 3 Sacajawea 4 Saghahe 4 Totem 5 Merit 2 24 4 15 PORTABLES LOCATED AT SUPPORT FACILITIES MOT I TDC 5 TO"I AL 6 HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES Sherwood Forest 1 ota NON INSTNUCI IONAI INS I NUCTIONAL Decatuw 9 Federal Way 2 1 Thomas Jefferson 7 Todd Beamer 7 1 TOTAL 25 PORTABLES LOCATED AT SUPPORT FACILITIES MOT I TDC 5 TO"I AL 6 HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES Sherwood Forest 1 ota FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Student Forecast Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation The maloriq of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school -building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time In a stable population the cohort would be 1 00 for all grades This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward This method does not trace individual students, it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis The district collects information on birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted. A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level. The Enrollment Master TM software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment. In December 2006, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District. The report was complete in January 2007. The model used to forecast next year's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county -wide average), 16 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections. The long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes in the 5-19 age group for King County Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of something else (e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend for the school-age population over time The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2015. This model produces a projection that is between 23,000 and 24.000 when applied to the low, medium and high range modes This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington. Near term projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by current local economic conditions The District tracks new development from four permitting jurisdictions Long range planning assumes a student yield from proposed new housing consistent with historical growth patterns. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography These projections create a vision of the school district community in the future 17 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 22,000 21,000 20,000 c 0 a 19,000 d x 18,000 � w u O 17,000 16,000 15,000 Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast 06% 04% 02% 00% d -02% A d `u -04% e -06% -08% -1 0% -1 2% c' c� c� c� c -D r� -0 .0 *,o A `0 o°� o o° o°r o°s �°`° �o `'o 'o Oa O� Off, Ool O, °� SchoolYear D FTE -+- Percent of Change 18 Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections Simplified FTE (K Headcount = 5 F FL, Middle School FTE= 99 Headcount, Senior I hgh P I L = 945Headcount) Total K -12 Perce, CalendarYr School Year Elementary Middle School SeniorHigh FTE Chant 2002 2001-02 11,498 5,337 4,467 21,302 2003 2002-03 11,202 5,454 4,437 21,093 -1 0% 2004 * 2003-04 9,127 5,524 6,408 21,059 -02016 2005 2004-05 9,164 5,473 6,515 21,152 04% 2006 2005-06 9,105 5,309 6,770 21,184 0.2% 2007 2006-07 9,022 5,261 6,754 21,037 -0.7% 2008 82007-08 9,025 5,162 6,880 21,067 01% 2009 P2008-09 8,976 5,091 7,012 21,079 01% 2010 P2009-10 9,006 5,119 6,985 21,110 01% 2011 P2010-11 9,054 5,120 6,797 20,971 -0.7% 2012 P2011-11 9,113 5,085 6,749 20,947 -01% 2013 P2012-13 9,208 5,037 6,725 20,970 0.1% 2014 P2013-14 9,312 5,011 6,719 21,052 0.4% * New Configuration Elementary K-5 Middle School 6-8 High School 9-12 22,000 21,000 20,000 c 0 a 19,000 d x 18,000 � w u O 17,000 16,000 15,000 Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast 06% 04% 02% 00% d -02% A d `u -04% e -06% -08% -1 0% -1 2% c' c� c� c� c -D r� -0 .0 *,o A `0 o°� o o° o°r o°s �°`° �o `'o 'o Oa O� Off, Ool O, °� SchoolYear D FTE -+- Percent of Change 18 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Capacity Summaries All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and Senior High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information and the Student Forecast information The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs number of students at elementary, middle school, and senior high levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year. 19 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - ALL GRADES CAPACITY 1 21,067 Budget PTolected - - Calenddr Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 School Year 2007/08 2008109 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY FTE CAPACITY 19,896 20,282 19,896 20,282 19,896 20,282 19,896 20,282 19,996 20,382 20.096 20,482 20,096 24,482 Add or subtract changes to capacity Increase Capacity, Lakeland, Panther Lake Sunnycrest and Valhalla 100 100 2,675 2,675 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 19,896 1 19,896 19,896 19,996 20,096 20,096 20,096 Adjusted Progam FTE Capacity 20,282 1 20,282 20,282 20,382 20,482 20,482 20,482 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE, Enrollment 1 21,067 21,079 21,110 20,977 20,947 20,970 21,052 Internet Academy Enrollment (AAF FF) 296 296 296 296 296 1 296 295 1 Basic FTE Enrollment without Intemet Academy 20,771 20,783 20,814 20,675 20,651 20,674 20,756 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) 2,600 2,675 2,675 2,675 2,675 2,675 2,675 PROGRAM FTE CAPACITY (489) 1 (501) 1 (532) 1 (293) 1 (169) 1 (192) (274) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY Current Portable Capacity 2,600 2,675 2,675 2,675 2,675 2,675 2,675 Add/Subtract Portable Capacity 1 1 1 1 Add New Portable Capacity 75 2,174, 2,143 2,382 2,506 2,483 232( Deduct Portable Capacity Adjusted Portable Capacity 2,675 2,675 2,675 2,675 2,675 2,675 2,600 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE 1 1 1 1 CAPACITY 2,186 2,174, 2,143 2,382 2,506 2,483 232( 20 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS CAPACITY 9,025 Budget Projected - - Calendar Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 1 2014 School Year 2007/08 2008109 2009/10 2010/11 2011,112 2012/13 2013/14 BUILDING PROGRAM HEAD COUNT CAPACITY PTE CAPACITY 8,495 8,495 8,495 8,495 8,495 8,495 8,495 8,495 8,595 8,595 8,695 8,695 8,695 8,695 1 Increase Capacity, Lakeland, Panther Lake Sunnycrest and Valhalla 100 100 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 8,495 8,495 8,495 8,595 8,695 8,695 8,695 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 8,495 8,495 8,495 8,595 8,695 8,695 8,695 ENROLLMENT Basic 17E Enrollment 9,025 8,976 9,006 9 054 9,113 1 9,208 9,312 2 Internet Academy (AAFTE) 49 49 49 49 1 49 49 49 Basic PTE Enrollment without Intemet Academy 8,976 8,927 8,957 9,005 9,064 9,159 9,263 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) I 1,300 1,300 1,300 1 1 1 PROGRAM CAPACITY (48t) 1 (432) 1 (462) 1 (410) (369) (464) (568) RELOCATABLE CAPACI rY 3 Current Portable Capacity Add/Subtract portable capacity 1,225 7$ 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 Adjusted Portable Capacity 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1.300 1,300 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCA7AABLE CAPACITY 819 868 838 89U ``9" _ 8$i�'`11311 NOTES: 1 Increase Capacity at Lakeland, Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla 2 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 3 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available This is a calculated number only The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use 01 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - MIDDLE SCHOOLS CAPACITY 5,162 Budget Projected - - Calendar Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 School Year 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012%13 2013'14 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY FTE CAPACITY 5,760 5,818 5,760 5,818 5,760 5,818 5,760 5,818 5,760 5,818 5,760 5,818 5,760 5,818 600 600 600 600 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5,760 5,760 5,760 5,760 5,760 5,760 1 51760 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 5,818 5,818 5,818 5,818 5,818 5,818 1 5,818 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 5,162 5,091 5,119 5,120 5,085 5,037 5,011 1 Internet Academy (AAFTE) 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Acadetriy 5,086 5,015 5,043 5,044 5,009 4,961 4,935 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 PROGRAM CAPACITY 1 674 745 717 716 751 799 825 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 2 Curient Portable Capacity 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 Add/Subtract poitable capacity Add new portable capacity Adjusted Portable Capacity 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 1,274 1,345 1,317 1,316 1,351 1,399 1,425 NOTES: 1 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities 2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until pennanent facilities are available This is a calculated number only The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs Me District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use 22 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS CAPACITY 6.880 Budget Projected - - Calendai Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 School Year 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010111 2011/12 2012113 201314 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY RTE CAPACITY 5,641 5,969 5,641 5,969 5,641 5,969 5,641 5,969 5,641 5,969 5,641 5,969 5,641 5,969 Add or subtract changes to capacity Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5,641 5,641 5,641 5,641 5,641 5,641 5,641 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 5,969 5,969--75,969 5,969 5,969 5,969 5,969 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 6.880 7,012 6,985 6,797 6,749 6,725 6,729 1 Internet Academy (AAFTE) 171 171 1 171 1 171 171 171 1 171 1 Bask Ed without Internet Academy 6,709 6,841 6,814 6,626 6,57$ 6,554 6,558 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) 625 625 625 625 625 625 625 PROGRAM CAPACITY 1 (1,068) 1 (1,200) (1,1731 1 (985) (937) {913) (917) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 2 Current Portable Capacity 625 625 625 625 625 625 625 Adjusted PortableCaps;ityi' -� 62�"' ' 625 625`` $25 625 6 625 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE 1 1 1 3. CAPACITY (443) (575)-1- (548) (360) (312") (288) (292) NOTES: I Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities 2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available This is a calculated number only The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use 3 Capacity for unhoused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and no planning time in some classrooms Puget Sound Early College will house approximately 60 of the unhoused students 23 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN King County, the Citv of Federal Way, and the City of Kent Impact Fee Calculations Single and Multi -Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substantially adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multifamily unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that district - STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single- family units and multi -family units The factors used in the 2007 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single-family units that were constructed in the last five (5) years - IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Following the calculations for the student generation factor is a copy of the Impact Fee Calculation for single family and multifamily units based on King County Code 21 A and the Growth Management Act ➢ Temporary Facility Cost is the average cost of a portable purchased within the last 12 months. ➢ Site Acquisition Costs is the per acre cost of the last school site purchased (site 45), this is a negotiated purchase price. Plan Year 2008 Plan y ear 2007 Single Family Units $4,697. $3,018 Multi -Family Units 1 $1,647. $8.56 24 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN STUDENT GENE RATION NEW CONSTRUCT ION IN PRIOR 5 YEARS Single Family Student Generation DEVELOPMENT Numberof Single Family Dwellings Numberof Multi -Family Dwellings Numberof Elementary Students Numberof Middle School Students Numberof Senior High Students Elementary Student Factor Middle School Student Factor Senior High Student Factor Total Student Factor (07) Colella Estates 53 0 7 6 7 0 1321 0 1132 0 1321 03774 07 Woodbrook 151 0 30 17 25 01987 01126 01656 04768 (06 Devonshire 29 0 17 8 13 05862 3 2759 04483 1 3103 (06) Orchid Lane 50 0 18 11 11 03600 D2200 02200 03000 05) Danville Stat on 78 0 37 21 15 04744 02692 0 1923 09359 05 Nonhlake Ride 179 0 59 38 46 03296 02123 02570 0 7989 (04) Hunter's Glen 47 0 9 3 17 0 1915 00638 03517 06170 (04) Bluffs at Redondo 28 0 9 3 6 03214 0 1071 02143 06429 (03) Cedar Heights Estates 38 0 11 10 6 02895 2263 2 01579 07105 (03) Silverwood 68 0 19 19 11 02794 0 2794 01618 07206 Total 721 0 216 136 157 Student Generation 0 2996 0 1886 0 2178 07060 Multi Family Student Generation DEVELOPMENT Numberof Single Family Dwellings Numberof MultiFamilyElementary Dwellings Numberof Students Numberof Middle School Students I Numberof Senior High Students Elementary Student Factor Middle School Student Factor Senior High Student Factor Total Student Factor Lodge at Peasley Canyon 0 312 32 13 14 0 1026 0 0417 0 0449 0 1891 Brookside Vtllage 0 175 23 15 27 0 1314 0 0857 0 1543 0 3714 Total 0 487 55 28 41 Student Generation D 1129 00575 0,0842 0 2T4-6- 25 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPTIAL FACtLI I IES PLAN School Site Acquisition Cost: Facility Cost/ Acreage Acre Elementary Middle School Sr High IMPACT FEE Student Student Facility Factor Factor Canacit, CFR MFR Cost/ Cost/ SFR MFR 0001 0 00 120 $0 $0 $0 417 921 133 0 2996 0 1886 0 2178 0 1129 00575 00842 10 10 $0 $o $o $0 TO ► AL 5o $0 School Construction Cost: %Perm Fac / Facility Total Sq Ft Cost Elementary Middle School Sr I ligh Student Student Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Canaciry SFR MFR SFR MFR 9621% 96 21 % 96 21 % 59,100,000 $0 SO 200 921 933 02996 0 1886 02178 01129 00575 60942 $13,115 $4942 $0 $0 $0 $o TOTAL 513,115 $4,942 Temporary Facility Cost: % I emp Fac Facility Facility fotal Sq Ft Cost Size Elementary Middle School Sr High Student Student Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ SFR MFR SFR MFR 3 79% 3 79°% 3 79% $128,982 $0 $0 1 25 25 25 0 2996 0 1886 02178 0 1129 0 0575 00842 $59 $22 SO S0 $0 $0 101- \L $59 S22 State Matching Credit Calculation - Area Cost Sq Ft Allowarice/Sci Ft Student Elementary Middle School New Sr High Student Student State Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Match SFR MFR SFR MFR $162 43 $162 43 $16243 90 1 17 130 61 90%1 0100% 000.1 029961 0 1886 021781 0 1129 00575 00842 $2,711 $1 022 $0 $o $0 $0 Total $2,711 51,022 Tar Payment Credit Calculation Average Assessed Value (April 2007) Capital Bond Interest Rate (April 2007) Net Present Value of Average Dwelling Years Amortved Property 7 as Levy Rate Present Value of Revenue Stream SFR MFR $262,848 $63 234 408% 408% $2 123 468 $510,848 10 10 $127 $127 52,697 $649 26 Single Family Multi -Family Residences Residences Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition CostPermanent Facility Cost $ 13,115 $ 4,942 Temporary Facility Cost $ 59 $ 22 State Match Credit $ (2,711) $ (1,022) Tae Payment Credit $ (2 6971 $ (649) Sub -Total $ 7,766 $ 3,294 50% Local Share $ 3,883 $ 1 647 ImpactFee S 3,883 $ 1,647 26 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The 2008 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document, based on the 2007 Capital Facilities Plan. The changes between the 2007 Plan and the 2008 Plan are listed below. SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN The Six Year Finance Plan has been rolled forward to reflect 2008/2014 SECTION III - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION CAPACITY Elementary school capacity reflects program changes for the 2007/08 school year. Elementary capacity includes space for All Day Kindergarten programs at every elementary school. Changes to the Building Program Capacities calculation are found on page 13. PORTABLES The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page 15 STUDENT FORECAST The Student Forecast now covers 2008 through 2014. Enrollment history and projections are found on page 18. CAPACITY SUMMARY The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity Capacity Summaries are found on pages 20-23. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY CODE 21A The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors. The adjustment made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 2007 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2008 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page 29. 27 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2007 TO 2008 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation The changes in student Generation factors between the 2007 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2008 Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age of the developments and the year placed in the survey. The Student Generation worksheet is found on page 25. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COSTS The anticipated cost for replacing Lakeland, Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla is $70,000,000. The replacement will add 50 new seats to the school capacity at each building. The total capacity at these four elementary schools is currently 1505 Adding 200 additional seats will increase the capacity by 13% Total Cost .13 X $70,000,000 = 59,100,000 28 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2007 TO 2008 IMPACT FEE Item From/To Comment Percent of Permanent Facilities 96 08% to 96.21% Report 93 OSPI Percent Temporary Facilities Average Cost of Portable Classroom Area Cost Allowance State Match Average Assessed Value Capital Bond Interest Rate Property Tax Levy Rate Single Family Student Yield Elementary Middle School High School Multi -Family Student Yield Elementary Middle School High School 3 92% to 3.79% $128,106 to $128,982 $154.22 to $162.43 No Change SFR — $245,644 to $262,848 MFR — $57,873 to $63,234. 4.39% to 4.08% $1.14to$1.27 .3030 to .3462 .2013 to .2186 2013 to .2418 .0929 to .1129 0410 to .0575 0628 to .0842 29 Updated portable inventory Updated average of portables purchased and placed in 2006 Change effective Julyl, 2007 Per Puget Sound Educational Service District (ESD 121) Market Rate King County Treasury Division Updated Housing Inventory Updated Housing Inventory Mission Federal Way Public Schools is obligated to educate all students in academic knowledge, skills, abilities and responsible behavior to be successful, contributing members of a free society Vision All students proficient in reading and math All students will meet or exceed standards in reading and math on all WASL tests Federal Way Public Schools 3140518"' Avenue S Federal Way, Washington 98003-5433 (253) 945-2000 This document is published by the Business Services Department of the Federal Way Public Schools June 2007 '` Federal Way Public Schools I • Ever} 5ntdew, a Reader Ilic 74, WIARO W OM - ip rpt ...... za�- AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 448 915 Fourth Street NE Auburn, Washington 98002 (253) 931-4900 Serving Students in Unincorporated King County City of Auburn City of Algona City of Kent City of Pacific BOARD of DIRECTORS Carol Helgerson Craig Schumaker Janice Nelson Clarissa Ruston Ray Vefik Linda S Cowan, Superintendent AM66.., AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT "Avenue to Excellence" Table of Contents Section I Executive Summary . ................ Page 1 Section II Enrollment Projections ................... Page 6 Section III Standard of Service ..... Page 8 Section IV Inventory of Facilities Page 15 Section V Pupil Capacity ..... ... .. Page 18 Section VI Capital Construction Plan ... Page 21 Section VII Impact Fees... .. . . .. .. Page 24 Section VIII Appendices . ........................... Page 28 Appendix A 1 - Student Enrollment Projections Page 29 Appendix A 2 - Capital Facilities Plan Projections Page 43 Appendix A 3 - Student Generation Survey Page 48 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2007 through 2013 Executive Summary This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Auburn School District (the "District") as the District's principal planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2007 This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic long range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period; other factors and trends in the use of facilities; and other needs of the District as may be required However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and within the City of Auburn and City of Kent; the King County Council, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction's respective comprehensive plan To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of Algona and Pacific, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, the Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly The Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the District The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the District's specific needs In general, the District's current standard provides that class size for grades K-2 should not exceed 25 students; class size for grades 3A should not exceed 27 students, class size for grade 5 should not exceed 30 students. When averaged over the six elementary grades, this computes to 26 5 students per classroom. Class size for grades 6-12 should not exceed 30 students, with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers (See Section 111 for more specific information ) The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The District's 2 2006-07 capacity was 13,168 whereas Full Time Equivalent ("FTE") enrollment for this same period was 13,734 66. The actual number of individual students was 14,418 as of October 1, 2006. (See Section V for more specific information ) The capital construction plan shown in Section VI addresses the additions to the District's existing facilities This provided for a new high school approved by the voters in February 2003 and opened in September 2005 and the addition of two new elementary schools approved by the voters in February 2005. Also, the acquisition of a new middle school site and construction of a new middle school and the acquisition of a new elementary school site is needed to accommodate growth The new facilities are required to meet the projected student population increase to be generated from the large development areas within the Auburn School District Three areas that have significant impact on the school district are the Lakeland South, the Lea Hill, and the north Auburn valley areas of the district There are other pockets of development that impact the District as well. The City of Kent has an area of approximately 158 acres that was sold to developers in 2004. The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the fiscal impact incurred by a District experiencing growth and development Section VII sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multi -family dwelling units. The student generation factors have been generated using the students who actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and multi -family developments constructed in the last five years The method of collecting the data is with the use of GIS mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County GIS, and to integrate the mapping with student data from the District data system This method gives the District actual student generation numbers for each grade span for identified developments. This data is contained in Appendix A.3. Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2007 through 2013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CHANGES FROM 2006 TO 2007 Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2006 Capital Facilities Plan that are a part of the 2007 Plan The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference Section Executive Summary A Updated to reflect new information within the Plan B Summary level list of changes from previous year Section i Enrollment Projections Updated protections See Appendices A 1 & A2 Section HI Standard of Service A Increase in English as a Second Language program required 1 additional classroom at the elementary level B Increase of 1 teaming specialist classroom at elementary level C Increase of 1 early childhood classroom at elementary level 0 Reduction of 1 second grade TOSA program at elementary level E Increase of 4 full day kindergarten programs at elementary level F Increase of 2 special education resource rooms at elementary level G Increase of 1 structured learning classroom at middle school level H Reduction of 2 special education resource rooms at high school level Section IV Inventory of Facilities Updated to include Arthur Jacobsen Elementary School in inventory, opening 2007 Section V Pupil Capacity Updated to include Arthur Jacobsen Elementary School in inventory, opening 2007 4 Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2007 through 201 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Section VII Impact Fees CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2006 to 2007 DATA ELEMENTS CPF 2006 CPF 2007 EXPLANATION Student Generation Factors Single Family Consistent with King County Ordinance 11621, Elementary 03010 03120 Student Generation Factors are calculated Mid School 01510 01270 by the school district based on district Sr High 01660 01610 records of average actual student generation Multi -Family rates for new developments constructed Elementary 00611 00460 over the last five years Mid School 00317 00190 Sr High 00452 00340 School Construction Costs Elementary $16,900,000 $21,500,000 Updated project estimated costs Middle School $30,000,000 $42,000,000 Updated project estimated costs High School $58,500,000 $0 High School in full operation Site Aquistion Costs Cost per acre $146,000 $228,269 Updated estimates on land costs Boeckh Index $15422 $15422 Updated to protected SPI schedule (G Beck) Match % - State 55 71 % 58 11 % Updated to current SPI schedule Match % - District 4429% 4189% Computed District Average AV Single Family $237,281 $257,404 Updated from February 2007 King County Dept of Assessments data Multi -Family $57,530 $69,427 Updated from March 2007 King County Dept of Assessments data using weighted average Debt Sery Tax Rate $239 $214 Current Fiscal Year GO Bond Int Rate 439% 408% Current Rate (Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-07) Section VIII Appendices Appendix A 1 - Updated enrollment projections from October 1, 2006 Appendix A 2 - Updates enrollment projections with anticipated buildout schedule Appendix A 3 - Student Generation Survey Auburn School Dislnd No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2D07 through 2013 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS The Auburn School Distinct uses a modified cohort survival model to project future enrollment for all of the District's operations Table II 1 Is an extract from the comprehensive projection model found In Appendix A 2 titled "CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections" This Table shows the anticipated enrollment for the next six years based on the previous 13 year history of the District under the assumptions set forth in the comprehensive projections, Appendix A 1, and the projection for additional students generated from the Lakeland South and Lea Hill areas as shown in Appendix A 2 TABLE ASO ENROLLMENT 2007-2008 11.1 PROJECTIONS Oct 2006 2010-2011 2011-2012 ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 KD G 941 960 978 1000 1022 1037 1053 1 1012 1013 1032 1056 1079 1095 1111 2 1002 1041 1042 1065 1088 1104 1120 3 1031 1040 1079 1084 1107 1124 1140 4 1049 1060 1069 1112 1118 1135 1152 5 998 1084 1095 1109 1153 1152 1169 K-5 6033 6197 6295 6424 6567 6647 6745 6 1058 1028 1114 1130 1145 1181 1181 7 1014 1096 1066 1156 1172 1179 1216 8 1072 1043 1125 1099 1190 1198 1206 6-8 3144 3167 3305 3385 3506 3559 3602 9 1372 1385 1362 1456 1439 1527 1542 10 1400 1322 1332 1311 1402 1372 1458 11 1322 1326 1244 1255 1231 1310 1277 12 1147 1248 121169 1178 1144 1221 9-12 5241 1 5281 5188 5192 5250 1 5353 5497 TOTALS 14418 1 14645 14787 15001 15323 1 15558 15844 GRADES K-12 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-200912009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 K-5 w1K @ 112 5563 5717 5806 5924 6056 6128 6219 6-8 3144 3167 3305 3385 3506 3559 3602 9-12 5241 5281 5188 5192 5250 5353 5497 K-12 WK 112 13948 14166 14298 14501 14812 15040 15318 Aubum School Datnct No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2007 through 2013 STANDARD OF SERVICE The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent indicate that each school district must establish a "Standard of Service' in order to ascertain the overall capacity to house its projected student population The Supenntendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage "capacity' guidelines for computing state funding support The fundamental purpose of the SPI guidelines is to provide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching funds for school construction projects By default these guidelines have been used to benchmark the distnct's capacity to house its student population The SPI guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, facility configurations, emerging educational reform, or the dynamics of each student's educational program The Auburn School District Standard of Service addresses those local considerations that require space in excess of the SPi guidelines The effect on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation pattern Conditions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without accompanying computations OVERVIEW The Auburn School District operates thirteen elementary schools housing 6,033 students in grades K through 5 The 905 of the 955 Kindergarten students attend 1/2 days throughout the year Grades 1 through 5, plus 125 kindergartners, attend on a full day basis When converted to a full time equivalence the K-5 enrollment is 5,563 Four middle schools house 3,144 students in grades 6 through 8 The District operates three comprehensive senior high schools and one alternative high school housing 5,241 students in grades 9 through 12 The District opened the fourth high school in the fall of 2005 CLASS SIZE The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the student population Class sizes are subject to collective bargaining Changes to class size agreements can have significant impact on available space The current pupil/teacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 26 5 students per teacher Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 26 5 students per room at grades K-5 At grades 6 - 12 the limit is set at 30 pupils per room The SPI space allocation for each grade articulation level, less the computed reduction for the Auburn School District Standard of Service, determines the District's capacity to house projected pupil populations These reductions are shown below by grade articulation level ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING AND BEHAVIORAND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses eight classrooms to provide for 96 students The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPI space guidelines No lass of capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to total elementary population 9 Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2007 through 2013 STANDARD OF SERVICE SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring Instruction to address their specific disabilities Seventeen standard classrooms are required to house this program The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space guidelines by eleven standard classrooms The loss of capacity is expected as growth in program is larger than the total elementary population Loss of Permanent Capacity 11 rooms @ 26 5 each = (292) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (292) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the elementary level One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 26 5 each = (27) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (27) HEAD START The Auburn School District operates a Head Start program for approximately 118 youngsters in six sections of 1/2 day in length The program is housed at Evergreen Heights Elementary School and utilizes three standard elementary classrooms and auxiliary office space The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 26 5 each = (80) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (80) EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a pre-school program for young children with disabilities below age five This program is housed at seven different elementary schools and currently uses nine standard classrooms The housing requirements for this program are not provided form the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 26 5 each = (186) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (186) 10 Aubum School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2007 through 2013 STANDARD OF SERVICE READING LABS The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional language arts instruction These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces If available in each elementary school Four elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available, thus they are housed In a standard classroom The housing requirements for this program are not provided for In the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 26 5 each = (106) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @126 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (106) MUSIC ROOMS The district elementary music programs require one acoustically modified classroom at each elementary school for music Instruction The housing requirements are not provided for In the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 26 5 each = (371) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (371) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the elementary school level for students learning English as a second language This program requires fourteen standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms C 26 5 each = (371) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (371) SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for nine highly impacted elementary schools This pullout model provides direct Instruction to students who are not at grade level and do not receive other services This program requires eight standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 26 5 each = (212) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (212) ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a learning specialist program to Increase literacy skills for first and second graders This program model has been created from the 1-728 funds and currently has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms, as well as pulling out students into designated classrooms The district Is utilizing classrooms at all fourteen elementary schools Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 26 5 each = (371) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (371) 11 Aubum School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2007 through 201 STANDARD OF SERVICE MIDDLE SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCA770H The Auburn School District operates three structured learning classrooms at the middle school level for students with moderate disabilities One developmentally disabled classroom for students with profound disabilities The housing requirements for this program are provided in the SPI space allocations ACCESS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District provides a transition program for students with behavioral disorders The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses one classroom The housing requirements for this program are provided In the SPI space allocations SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific disabilities Three classrooms per school (twelve total) are required to provide for approximately 300 students The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the SPI space guidelines MIDDLE SCHOOL COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates a minimum of one computer lab at each middle school This program utilizes a standard classroom per middle school The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ENGLISH ASA SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for students learning English as a second language This program requires four standard classrooms that are not provided for In the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes elective options in special interest areas Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations SPI Report #3 dated 11/08/06 identifies 151 teaching stations available in the mid-level facilities The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each = (240) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss '(240) 12 Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2807 through 201 STANDARD OF SERVICE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS SENIOR HIGH COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates two computer tabs at each of the senior high schools This program utilizes two standard classrooms at comprehensive high schools and one at West Auburn The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 30 each = (210) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (210) ENGLISH ASA SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School Distinct operates a pullout program at three comprehensive high schools for students learning English as a second language This program requires five standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 30 each = (150) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (150) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates four structured learning center classrooms for 46 students with moderate to severe disabilities The housing requirements for this program are provided in the SPI space guidelines SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities The current senior high school program requires thirteen classrooms to provide for approximately 404 students The SPI space guidelines provide for one of the thirteen teaching stations Loss of Permanent Capacity 12 rooms @ 30 each = (360) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (360) PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS Auburn High School Includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center The SPI Inventory Includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity This space was not Intended for nor Is It usable for classroom Instruction It was constructed to provide a community center for the performing arts Using SPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet computes to 206 unhoused students or B 33 classrooms Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 33 rooms @ 30 each = (250) 13 Aubum School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2007 through 2013 STANDARD OF SERVICE ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that Includes numerous elective options In special interest areas Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations SPI Report #3 dated 11/08/06 Identifies 148 teaching stations available In the senor high facilities The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 10 teaching stations Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 30 each = (300) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (300) STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS ELEMENTARY Loss of Permanent Capacity = (2,014) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (2,014) MIDDLE SCHOOL Loss of Permanent Capacity = (480) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (480) SENIOR HIGH Loss of Permanent Capacity = (1,270) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,270) TOTAL Loss of Permanent Capacity = (3,764) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (3,764) 14 Auburn School Dislnd No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2007 through 2013 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES Table IV I shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OSPI rated capacities. Table IV.2 shows the number and location of each portable unit by school. "Rte district uses relocatable facilities to- t, provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting. 2. make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique student needs, and 3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on existing physical plants Core facilities (i.e. gymnasiums, restrooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc.) are not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable classrooms. Table Permanent Facilities District School Facilities IV I @OSPI Rate Capacity (November 2006) 836 1730 1015 24th Street Northeast, Aubum WA 98002 -Olympic Middle School Buildh City Acres Address 849 26 33 Elementary Schools Elementary 492 540 20 E Street Northeast Auburn WA 98002 -Washington Terminal Park Elementary 401 670 1101 D Street Southeast Auburn WA 98002 Dick Scobee Elementary 550 1050 1031 14th Street Northeast Auburn WA 98002 Pioneer Elementary 415 830 2301 M Street Southeasb Auburn WA 98002 Chinook Elementary 485 875 3502 Auburn Way South, Auburn WA, 98092 Lea Hill Elementary 459 10.00 30908 124th Avenue Southeast Auburn WA 98092 Gddo Rey Elementary 531 1000 1005 37th Street Southeast Auburn WA, 98002 Heights Elem 456 809 5602 South 316th, Auburn WA 98001 -Evergreen AI ac Elementary 494 1060 310 Milwaukee Boulevard North, Pacific WA, 98047 Lake View Elementary 595 1640 16401 Southeast 318th Street Auburn WA 98092 Hazelwood Elememtary 578 1267 11815 Southeast 304th Street Auburn WA, 98092 Ilalko Elementary 585 1200 301 Oravetz Place Southeast,Auburn WA, 98092 Lakeland Hills Elementa 585 1200 1020 Eve reen Wa SE, Auburn WA,98092 Arthur Jacobsen Elementa 58S' 1000 29205 I32 Street SE, Auburn, WA 98092 ELEM CAPACITY 7211 Cascade Middle School 836 1730 1015 24th Street Northeast, Aubum WA 98002 -Olympic Middle School 898 1740 1825 K Street Southeast Auhum WA, 98002 Rainier Middle School 849 26 33 30620 116th Avenue Southeast Auburn WA 98092 Mt Baker Middle School 845 30 88 620 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 West Auburn High School 1 231 1 5 10 1 401 West Main Street, Auburn WA, 98001 Auburn Senior High 2,261 18 60 1 800 Fourth Street Northeast Auburn WA 98002 Auburn Riverside HS 1,388 33 00 501 Oravetz Road Auburn WA 98092 Auburn Mountainview HS 1,431 4000 128900 124 Ave SE Auburn, WA 98092 SH CAPACITY 5,311 TOTAL CAPACITY 15,950 *Estimated - Not included in November 2006 OSPI Report 116 Auburn School Detrict No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2007 through 2013 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES TABLE TEMPORARYIRELOCATABLE 2007-08 IV 2 FACILITIES INVENTORY I 2010-11 2011-12 March 2007 Cascade Elements Location 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Terminal Park 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Dick Scobee 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Pioneer 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Chinook 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Lea Hill 5 5 2 2 2 2 2 Gildo Rey 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Evergreen Heights 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 Alpac 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Lake View 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Hazelwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 llalko 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 Lakeland Hills Elementary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Arthur Jacobsen Elements - 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 33 30 29 29 29 29 29 TOTAL CAPACITY 875 795 769 769 769 769 769 Middle School Location 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 Cascade 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 Olympic 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 Rainier 5 5 6 8 8 8 8 Mt Baker 4 4 6 6 8 8 8 TOTAL UNITS 9 9 16 18 20 20 20 TOTAL CAPACITY 270 270 480 540 600 600 600 Sr High School Location 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 West Auburn 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 Auburn 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Auburn Riverside 10 13 13 13 13 13 13 Aubum Mountainview 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 22 25 26 26 26 26 26 TOTAL CAPACITY 660 750 780 780 780 780 780 (COMBINED TOTAL UNITS 64 14 71 73 75 75 71 COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY I 1, 05 l i 815 I 2.029 12.039 12,149 2.149 12,149 17 Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2007 through 2013 PUPIL CAPACITY While the Auburn School District uses the SPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from which to determine space needs, the District's educational program requires more space than that provided for under the fomluia This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in Section III, Standard of Service The District's capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional space to house its programs Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new unfunded facilities The combined effect of these adjustments is shown on Line B in Tables V 1 and V 2 below Table V 1 shows the Distict's capacity with relocatable units included and Table V 2 without these units Table VA Capacity 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 WITH relocatables A SPI Capacity 15,365 15,365 15,950 15,950 15,950 16,750 16,750 A 1 SPI Capacity -New Elem 585 A 2 SPI Capacity- New MS 800 B Capacity Adjustments 2,199 1,949 1,735 1,675 1,615 1,615 1,615 13,166 14,001 14,215 14,275 15,135 15,135 15,135 C Net Capacity D ASD Enrollment 14,418 14,645 14,787 15,001 15,323 15,558 15,844 E ASD Surplus/Deficit (1,252) (644) (572) (727) (188) (424) (710) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Include Relocatable 1,805 1,815 2,029 2,089 2,149 2,149 2,149 Exclude SOS 14 4,004 3,764 3,764 3,764 3,764 3,764 3,764 Total Adjustments (2,199) (1,949) (1,735) (1,675) (1,615) (1,615) (1,615) Table V.2 Capacity 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 1 2011-12 2012-13 WITHOUT relocatables A SPI Capacity 15,365 15,365 15,950 15,950 15,950 16,750 16,750 A 1 SPI Capacity -New Elem 585 A 2 SPI Capacity- New MS 800 B Capacity Adjustments 4,004 3,764 3,764 3,764 3,764 3,764 3,764 11,361 12,186 12,186 12,186 12,986 12,986 12,986 C Net Capacity D ASD Enrollment 14,418 14,645 14,787 15,001 15,323 15,558 15,844 E ASD Surplus/Deficit (3,057) (2,459) (2,601) (2,815) (2,337) (2,572) (2,858) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Exclude SOS 14 4,004 3,764 3,764 3,764 3,764 3,764 3,764 Total Adjustments (4,004) (3,764) (3,764) (3,764) (3,764) (3,764) (3,764) 1/ New facilities shorn in 2010-11 are not funded under the current Capital Facilities Plan g/ The Standard of Service represents 26 05% of SPI capacity When new facilities are added the Standard of Service computations are decreased to 23 95% of SPI capacity 3/ Students beyond the capacity are accomodated in other spaces (commons, library, theater, shared teaching space) 19 C PERMANENT FACILITIES SPI Rated Capacity Manch 2007 PlpT trim SChMk Aubum School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2007 through 2013 PUPIL CAPACITY Building 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 Washington 492 492 492 492 492 492 492 Terminal Park 401 401 401 401 401 401 401 Dick Scobee 550 550 550 550 550 550 550 Pioneer 415 415 415 415 415 415 415 Chinook 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 Lea Hill 459 459 459 459 459 459 459 Gildo Rey 531 531 531 531 531 531 531 Ever Heights 456 456 456 456 456 456 456 Alpac 494 494 494 494 494 494 494 Lake View 595 595 595 595 595 595 595 Hazelwood 578 578 578 578 578 578 578 Ilalko 585 585 585 585 585 585 585 Lakeland Hills Elementar 585 585 585 585 585 585 585 Arthur Jacobsen 0 585 585 585 585 585 585 Elna #15 K7CAPACITY 6,626 7,211 7,211 7,211 7,211 1 7,211 7,211 MAHIP Sirhnnls Building 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 Cascade 836 836 836 836 836 836 836 Olympic 898 898 898 898 898 898 898 Rainier 849 849 849 849 849 849 849 Mt Baker 845 845 845 845 845 845 845 Middle School #5 0 0 0 0 800 800 800 MS CAPACITY 1 3,428 1 3,428 1 3,428 1 3,4281 4,2281 4,2281 4,228 Senior Hiqh Schools Building 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 West Aubum 231 231 231 231 231 231 231 Aubum 2,261 2,261 2,261 2,261 2,261 2,261 2,261 Auburn Riverside 1,388 1,388 1,388 1,388 1,388 1,388 1,388 Aubum Mountainview 1,431 1,431 1,431 1,431 1,431 1,431 1,431 SH CAPACITY 5,311 5,311 5,311 5,311 5,311 5,311 5,311 ICOMBINEDCAPAcrryl 15,365 I 15,950 I 15,950 1 15,950 1 16,750 1 16,750 1 16,750 20 Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2D07 through 2013 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974 with the formation of a community wide citizens committee The result of this committee's work was published in the document titled 'Guidelines for Development' In 1985 the Board formed a second Ad Hoc citizens committee to pick up from the work of the first and address the needs of the District for subsequent years The work of this committee was published in the document titled 'Directions for the Nineties ' In 1995 the Board commissioned a third Ad Hoc citizens committee to make recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and physical facilities The committee recommendations are published in the document titled 'Education Into The Twenty -First Century - -A Community Involved' The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop plans for the implementation, funding, and deployment of technology throughout the District's programs The 1996 Bond proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate technological applications The 1998 Capital Levy provided funding to further deploy technology at a level sufficient to support program requirements in every classroom and department In 2005 a replacement technology levy was approved to continue to support technology across all facets of the District's teaching, learning and operations In addition to the technology needs of the District the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District must prepare for continued student enrollment growth. As stated in their report, "the District must pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible " The Ad Hoc recommendation included commentary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent rates of assessment. A proposition was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that is providing $8,000,000 over six years to address some of the technology needs of the District, and $5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire school sites During the 1997-98 school year a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Diennger School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population that will come from an area that includes a large development known as Lakeland South Lakeland South is immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the Auburn School District On June 16, 1998 the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Diennger Boards of Directors. On June 22, 1998 the Auburn School Board adopted Resolution No 933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 23, 1998 the Diennger School Board adopted a companion Resolution No 24-97-98 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from Diermger to Auburn containing most of the Lakeland South development and certain other undeveloped properties Development in this area is progressing at an aggressive rate. In April of 2002, the Board formed a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two items and make recommendations to the board in the Fall of 2002. a. A review of the conclusion and recommendations of 1985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees related to accommodating high school enrollment growth. This includes the review of possible financing plans for new facilities b. Develop recommendations for accommodating high school enrollment growth for the next 10 years if a new senior high school is not built. This committee recommended the board place the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in February 2003 The February election approved the new high school at 68 71% yes votes The school opened in the Fall of 2005 In the Fall of 2003 the school board directed the administration to begin the planning and design for Elementary #13 and Elementary #14. In the Fall of 2004, the Auburn School Board passed resolution #1054 to place on the ballot in February 2005 two elementary schools. The voters approved the ballot measure in February of2005 at 64.72% Lakeland Hills Elementary (Elementary #13) opened in the Fall of2006 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary (Elementary #14) is under construction in the Lea Hill area on a 10 acre site and is scheduled to open in the Fall of 2007. 22 1I 11 Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 200T through 2013 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN In the 2004-05 school year, the Board convened a sixth Citizen's Ad Hoc committee to again study and make recommendations about the future impacts in the District. One of the areas of study was the need for New Facilities and Modernization. The committee made a number of recommendations including school size, the need for a new middle school, and to begin a capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities based upon criterion. The committee also recommended that the Distinct have Middle School #5 on-line by Fall of 2009 During the 2005-06 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Kent School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population that will come from an area that includes a number of projected developments in the north Auburn valley On May 17, 2006 the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a Joint meeting of the Auburn and Kent Boards of Directors. On June 14, 2006 the Kent School Board adopted Resolution No 1225 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 26, 2006 the Auburn School Board adopted a companion Resolution No 1073 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from Kent to Auburn effective September 29, 2006. The District is projecting 1358 additional students within the six year period including the Lakeland, Lea Hill, and north Auburn valley areas This increase in student population will require the acquisition of anew middle school and new elementary school sites and construction of a middle school and elementary school during the six year window. Based upon the District's capacity data and enrollment projections, as well as the student generation data included in Appendix A.3, the District has determined that approximately seventy-two percent of the capacity improvements are necessary to serve the students generated from new development, with the remaining additional capacity required to address existing need The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population and passage of bond issues. 2006.13 Capital Construction Plan March 2007 Projected Fund Project Tlmehnes Project Funded Cost Source 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 All Facilities - 2006 Technology Yes $12,000,000 6 Year XX XX XX XX XX Modernization Cap Levy Impact Portables Yes $700,000 Fees XX XX XX XX Property Purchase Impact New Middle School Yes $5,000,000 Fees XX XX New Elementary Yes $2,500,000 State Mat XX XX XX Bond XX Lakeland Hills Elem Yes $16,900,000 j Impact Fee open Bond XX XX Arthur Jacobsen Elem Yes $21,500,000 Impact Fee const open Bond XX XX XX XX Middle School #5 No $42 000,000 impact Fee plan const const open Bond XX XX Elementary#15 No $24,000,000 Im Fee Ian const V These funds may be secured through local bond issues, sale or real property, impact fees, and state matching funds The District currently is not eligible for state assistance at the elementary school level 23 Auburn School District No 406 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2007 through 2013 IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION (Spring 2007) Lakeland Hills Elementary within 6 year period Arthur Jacobsen Elementary within 6 year period Middle school site aogwslan wdhin 8 year period Middle School #5 w4hm 6 year period Elementary #15 site acgrushon within 8 year period I SITE OST PER RESIDENCE Forni ((Acres x Cost per Acre)IFeciliN Size) x Student Factor 6. PERMANENT FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCE Formula ((FacohN CosUFaality Seel x Student Factor) x (Parmanent to Toll Square Fcotal Site Cosy Faably Student Generator, Factor Cost/ Ccsu Single Family Acrea a Acre Capacr Single Family MuIU Famil Sirle Famil MultiFamily Elam (K - 5) 12 $228269 550 03120 00460 $1 553 89 $22910 M,ddle Son (6-e) 25 $226269 800 01270 00190 $9059A $13553 SrHigh 9-12) 40 $0 1500 01610 00340 $000 3000 $2,45983 $361 83 6. PERMANENT FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCE Formula ((FacohN CosUFaality Seel x Student Factor) x (Parmanent to Toll Square Fcotal III TEMPORARY FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCE Formula ((Facility Coe'Faorlrry Size) x Student Factor) x (Temporary to Total Square Footage Rail Si le Famil Facility FaalM1y %Perm Sq FV Student Generation Faclor Coat/ Coati Single Family Cosl Size Total Sq Ft Sm le Farrel Mul' Family Single FamilyMutt,Family 00460 00190 00340 Elem (K - 5) $21 500 000 1 550 09681 03120 0 0460 j $11 80729 1 51 74082 Mrd Sch (8 - Bf $42000 000 800 09681 0 1270 00190 16 45410 $96568 Sr High (9 - 12) $0 1500 09681 01610 D 0340 $000 $000 $18,25209 $2,70850 III TEMPORARY FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCE Formula ((Facility Coe'Faorlrry Size) x Student Factor) x (Temporary to Total Square Footage Rail Si le Famil Facility Cost Foully See %Temp Sq FV Total Sq FI StUdent Generalion Factor Stn le Fame Mulb Fam Cos' Sri le Fami Coal Muhl Famil $251645 Elem(K-5) Mid Sch (6 8) Sr Hi h(9-121 $105000 $105000 5105,000 265 30 30 00319 00319 00319 03120 0 1270 01610 00460 00190 00340 $3944 $14 18 $1795 $581 52 12 $380 31,229 19 $7159 $11 T3 Sr High(9-12) 315422 1V STATE MATCH CREDIT PER RESIDENCE Formula (80eckh Index x SP1 Fools a x District Match x Shil Factor) 80eokh SPI District Student t3onerelpn Factor COsU Coat/ Index Footage Match Single Family Multi Famny Sindle FamilyI Mu9i Familv $6,62133 l $95102 1 25 Elam (K-5) $15422 90 5811% 03120 00460 $251645 ill 02 Mid Sch (6 - 8) $154 22 108 5811% 0 1270 001 0190 31,229 19 $183 89 Sr High(9-12) 315422 130 5611% 01810 00310 31,87589 339611 $6,62133 l $95102 1 25 Auburn School Dlstnct No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2007 through 2013 Y TAX CREDIT PER RESIOENCE Formula Expressed as the present value of an annuity TC' PV(inlerest rale discount period average assd value x lax rate) Asad Value I Tax Rate I Ann 427 5214 408% V1, DEVELOPER PROVIDED FACILITY CREDIT Formula (Value of Sile or FacJity/Number or dwelling units) Value No of Units Facll Credit Single Family $000 1 $000 Mulh Family $000 / r $000 FEE PER UNIT IMPACT FEES RECAP Single MultiSUMMARY Fami Family Site Coate $2,45983 $384 63 Permanent Facility Const Costa $18,262 09 $2,70650 Temporary Facility Costs $71 59 $11 73 State Match Credit ($5621 33) ($951 02) Tax Credit (3445010) ($120028) FEE (No Discount) $1072208 $93156 FEE (50% Discount) $5 361 04 546579 FaoityCrd $000 $000 at 6104 1$465.76 26 of District No 408 ,CILITIES PLAN h 9r11t SINGLE FAMILY MULTI FAMILY 1 Mid Sch Sr High Elam MW Sch Sr High In 9a tion Factor 6 8 9-12 K-5 6 a 9-12 'r0 0 1270 01610 0 D48 0 019 0 034 800 1500 550 800 1500 ,000 $42,000000 $21500000 $42,000,000 24 706 i 30 30 265 30 30 00 $105,000 $105000 $105000 $105.000 $105,000 25 40 12 25 40 !89 $228269 $228,269 $228,269 $228269 $228,269 325 1 615 925 1 B15 925 1 815 925 1 815 925 1 615 925 18 53,248 53,248 53248 53248 53248 173 1 669 173 1 669 173 1 669 173 1 669 173 1,559 173 11 09681 09681 09681 09681 09681 I9 00319 00319 00319 00319 00319 108 130 90 108 130 22 $15422 $15422 $15422 $154 22 $154 22 % 5811% 5611% 5811% 5811% 5811% '% 4189% 4189% 4189% 4189% 4189% 04 $257404 $257404 $69427 569,427 $69,427 4 $214 $214 3214 $214 $214 K 408% 408% 4 08% 408% 408% 0% Pr01aatad Ant, Sow Lalesl Date�rolaciad Are In 9a tion Factor Required of A, mai60nCOSVACfe 99 110 02 094 76 259 500% Middle School 2007 $228269 24 706 25 087 18,750 Auburn School District No 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2007 through 2013 Section VIII Appendix Appendix A 1 - Student Enrollment Projections Appendix A 2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections Appendix A 3 - Student Generation Survey Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Auburn School District #408 Student Enrollment Projections October 2006 Introduction The projective techniques give some consideration to historical and current data as a basis for forecasting the future In addition, the `projector' must make certain assumptions about the operant variables within the data being used. These assumptions are "judgmental" by definition Forecasting can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future, or from the known to the unknown The attached tabular data reviews the history of student enrollment, sets out some quantitative assumptions, and provides projections based on these numerical factors. The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, psychological, economic, and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection. The logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today, and will be in the future It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over thirteen years and six years respectively. The results provide a trend, which reflects a long (13 -year) and a short (6 -year) base from which to extrapolate. Two methods of estimating the number of kindergarten students have been used. The first uses the average increase or decrease over the past 13 and 6 -year time frame and adds it to each succeeding year The second derives what the average percentage Aubum kindergartners have been of the live births in King County for the past 5 years and uses this to project the subsequent four years. The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact. This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections. Monitoring deviation is critical to the viability and credibility of the projections derived by these techniques. Tables Table 1— Thirteen Year History of October 1 Enrollments — page 32 The data shown in this table is the baseline information used to project future enrollment. This data shows the past record of enrollment in the district on October 1 of each year. Table 2 — Historical Factors Used in Projections - page 33 This table shows the three basic factors derived from the data in Table 1. These factors have been used in the subsequent projections. The three factors are: 1. Factor 1 — Average Pupil Change Between Grade Levels This factor is sometimes referred to as the "holding power" or "cohort survival " It is a measure of the number of pupils gained or lost as they move from one grade level to the next. 30 2. Factor 2 - Average Pupil Change by Grade Level This factor is the average change at each grade level over the 13 or 6 -year period. 3. Factor 3— Auburn School District Kindergarten Enrollment as a Function of King County Live Births. This factor calculates what percent each kindergarten class was of the King County live births in the 5 previous years. From this information has been extrapolated the kindergarten pupils expected for the next 4 years. Table 3 — Proiection Models — pages 3442 This set of tables utilizes the above mentioned variables and generates several projections. The models are explained briefly below ❑ Table 3.13 (pg 34) — shows a projection based on the 13 -year average gain in kindergarten (Factor 2) and the 13 -year average change between grade levels (Factor 1). The data is shown for the district as a whole. ❑ Table 3.6 (pg 34) — shows a projection using the same scheme as Table 3 13 except it shortens the historical to only the most recent 6 years ❑ Table 3.13A and 3 6A (pg 35) — uses the same factors above except Factor 3 is substituted for Factor 2. The kindergarten rates are derived from the King County live births instead of the average gain. ❑ Tables 3E.13, 3E 6, 3E. 13A, 3E.6A (pg 36) — breaks out the K-5 grades from the district projection Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Tables 3MS. 13, 3MS.6, 3MS 13A, 3MS 6A (pg 37)—breaks out the 6-8 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation ❑ Tables 3SH.13, 3SH.6, 3SH.13A, 3SH.6A (pg 38) -- breaks out the 9-12 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Table 4 (pg 39) — Collects the four projection models by grade group for ease of comparison. ❑ Table 5 (pgs 40-42) — shows how well each projection model performed when compared with actual enrollments. Data is provided in both number and percent formats for the past 13 years. 31 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2006 TABLE Thimen Year History o1 Ottooer 1 Enrollinents(Rev 10/05) 927 957 Actual 978 854 GRADE 94195 95/95 96/97 97/98 99/99 99.00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 1 05-06 00-07 KDG 927 1 957 963 978 854 849 912 846 905 922 892 955 941 1 984 948 990 1031 995 943 905 968 900 982 960 963 1012 2 957 989 970 1014 1023 1015 914 949 961 909 992 963 1002 3 963 971 990 980 1009 1054 1031 966 940 998 918 1002 1031 4 921 934 961 985 974 1012 1071 1077 973 947 11116 939 1049 5 933 930 917 958 982 983 1011 1108 1082 1018 957 1065 999 6 924 924 916 941 982 981 999 1028 1104 1111 1020 1004 1058 7 872 963 934 959 939 1015 979 1017 1021 1131 1124 1028 1014 8 964 868 949 911 959 974 1003 1004 1026 1052 1130 1137 1072 9 989 1073 1061 1153 1156 1202 1222 1405 1441 1473 1461 1379 1372 10 908 967 1084 1012 1185 1132 1157 1073 1234 1249 1261 1383 1400 11 819 886 893 1026 1007 1036 1007 1090 927 1010 1055 1182 1322 12 662 723 ..'1' 917 955 865 930 933 901 888 1088 1147 TOTALS 11802 12113 44 1 122789 1 12942 13051 13135 13481 13427 13702 13672 14088 14419 Percent of Gam 284% 271% 264% 135% 084% 064% 248% (025)% 205% (022)% 304% 234% Pupa Gain 311 326 328 173 109 84 326 -34 275 30 415 330 Average % Giun for 1 at 6 years 1 80% Average % Gain for lost B years 157% Average Pug1 Gain for 1 el 8 years 222 verge Pupil Gain for last 6 year 214 Average % Gain for 13 years 169% Average Pupil Gain for 13 years 218 KUG 927 957 953 978 854 849 912 848 905 922 892 955 941 KA2 2868 2894 2931 3D23 2872 2807 2731 2763 2766 2813 2844 2881 2855 K 5 5885 5729 5799 5946 5837 5858 5844 5914 5741 5774 5735 5887 6033 K-6 6809 6653 6715 8887 6799 6837 8842 6942 6845 6885 6755 6891 7091 1-3 2904 2908 2958 3025 3027 3012 2850 2883 2801 2887 2870 2928 3045 1-5 4758 4772 4836 4968 4983 5007 4932 5068 4836 4852 4843 4932 5092 1 8 5682 5696 5752 5909 5945 5988 5930 6098 5940 5963 5863 $936 6150 5-8 2760 2755 2799 2811 2860 297D 2980 3049 3151 3294 3274 3169 3144 7-8 1836 1831 1883 187D 1898 1989 1982 2021 2017 2183 2254 2165 20M 7.9 2804 2904 2944 3033 3054 3191 3204 3425 3488 3856 3715 3544 3458 9 12 3357 3829 3843 4012 4245 4226 4311 4498 4535 4634 4683 5032 5241 10 12 2389 2556 2782 2849 3089 3023 30119 3093 3094 3161 3202 3653 3869 pr106-07 xis Page 32 4(11(2007 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2006 TABLE Factors Used In Pro)9o5ons 2 Factor Average Pupil Change Between Grade 1 Levels 13 YEAR BASE AUBURN 6 YEAR BASE K to 1 63751 K to 1 8940 1102 1033 11o2 1D8 2to3 1933 2to3 2260 3 to 983 3104 2040 4 to 5 14 92 S to 1025 4 to 5 2960 5106 1740 6 to 1758 6107 1020 7to8 858 7toa 1920 8 to 9 28592 8 to 9 35540 910 10 (7392) 10 to 11 195 33) 91010 (12640 101011 (140 50) 11 to 12 193 001 11 to 12 (61 60) total 18625 total 21620 Factor 1 is the average gain or loss o1 pupils as they move from one grade level to the nerd Factor 1 uses the past (12) OR (5) years of changes Factor Awnlge Pup,l Change By Grade Level 2 13 YEAR BASE AUBURN B YEAR BASE K 117 1 233 K 19% 1 880 2 375 3 567 2 1060 3 1300 4 1067 4 (560) 5 542 5 (2200) 6 11 17-BooP12 173rd, 1 1183 ID 50) 8 900 1360 9 3367 (e5C 10 41 00 6640 11 41 92 4040 12 4042 4340 FacWr 2 is the average change m grade level slza Crohn i 5 OR 01102 Factor 3 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT KINDERGARTEN ENROLLMENTS AS FUNCTION OF KING COUNTY LIVE BIRTH RATES CAL- TOTAL YEAR ADJUSTED AUBURN KINDERGARTEN ENDAR LIVE I 213rds I 173rd, OF LIVE KDG ENROLLMENT ASA %OF YEAR BIRTHS BIRTHS BIRTHS ENROLL BIRTHS ENROLL ADJUSTED LIVE BIRTHS 1989 20 468 13 645 6 823 75/76 10 540 622 3 135% 1970 19 526 13 017 6 509 75177 17,465 652 3733% 1971 16 436 10,957 5,479 77(78 14 625 576 3952% 1972 13,719 9,146 4573 78!79 13539 598 4417% 1973 13 449 8,966 4 483 79/80 13,478 618 4 585% 1974 13493 8,995 4498 60/81 13524 600 4438% 1975 13,540 9 027 4 513 81182 13 687 588 4296% 1976 13751 9 174 4 587 82183 14,375 698 4856% 1977 14682 9 788 4,894 8314 14 958 666 4452% 1978 15,096 10,064 5,032 84185 16 045 726 4624% 1979 16,524 11 016 5,508 85186 16,708 792 4 740% 1980 18800 11200 5600 8FI87 17000 829 4876% 1981 17100 11,400 5 700 Ill 18,241 769 4 216% 1982 18 511 12 541 6,270 88/89 18 626 $17 4386% 1983 18 533 12 355 6 175 89/90 18 827 871 4626% 1984 15 974 12 649 6 325 90191 19 510 858 4 398% 1985 19778 13,185 6593 91/92 19,893 909 4569% 1986 19951 13,301 6,650 92193 21852 920 4210% 1987 22,8D3 15202 7,601 93194 21624 930 4301% 1988 21,034 14023 7,011 94195 24,062 B27 31 1989 25 576 17 051 6 525 95/96 28 358 954 3619% 1990 26 749 17,833 6 916 96/97 24 116 963 3 993 % 1991 22799 15199 7800 97198 20,973 978 4863% 1992 20,060 13373 8.687 95!99 21,573 $54 3959% 1993 22,330 14887 7,443 99100 22129 849 3837% 1994 22,029 14 588 7 343 00/01 24 013 912 3798% 1995 25 005 16 670 8,335 01102 22 717 846 3 724% 1996 21,573 14,382 7191 02103 21,822 905 4166% Leetd 1997 21646 14431 7215 0104 22,023 922 1188% year 1998 22 212 14,806 7,404 04105 22 075 592 4 Dill Avenge 1999 22 007 14 871 7,338 05106 22,327 955 4277% 4193% 2000 22,487 14 991 7,495 06107 22 014 941 Aelwl 1 4214% 2001 21,778 14,519 7,259 07/08 21 835 old <-Prl Average 2002 21 863 14 575 7,288 05/09 22 242 033 <-Pri Average 2003 22431 14954 7,477 09110 22745 DSI <-POOta Average 2004 22,902 15258 7,634 1W11 22,754 931 e_POcld Average 2005 22 680 15 120 7 560 1 75M ' prelial number O1DOH ,w..o, mi -.ar ounerxs rrasmngrvn aura utimar nl or "alto pJ06-07 As Page 33 4/112007 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS -October 2006 TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS PROJ PROJ PROJ PR OJ PROD PROD PRO. PROJ PROJ PROD PRO' 313 Basad on 13 Year History GRPDE 00107 C7100 05109 09!10 10111 11112 12/13 13114 14J 15 15115 1817 ACTUAL PR OJ PRO! PR OJ PROD PROD PRO! PROD PRO! PRO! PRO! PRO! PROD PRO! GRADE 011107 07108 08!09 09110 1011/ 71112 1211] 13!14 11!15 15!16 16117 17/18 18�t9 19120 KDG 941 942 943 945 946 947 946 949 950 952 953 954 955 956 1 1012 995 998 997 998 999 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1008 1009 2 1002 1022 1005 1006 1007 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1016 1017 1016 3 1031 1021 1042 1024 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1033 1034 1035 1036 4 1049 1041 1031 1052 1034 1035 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1044 1045 5 998 1064 1058 1046 1086 1049 1050 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1059 6 1056 1006 1074 1066 1056 1077 1059 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1068 7 1014 1075 1026 1092 1084 1074 1094 1077 1078 1079 1051 1082 1083 1084 8 1072 1023 1084 1034 1100 1092 1003 1103 1088 1087 1068 1089 1090 1091 9 1312 1358 1309 1370 1320 1386 1378 1366 1389 1372 1373 1374 1375 1376 10 1400 1298 1284 1235 1296 1246 1312 1304 1295 1315 1298 1299 1300 1301 11 1322 1305 1203 1169 1139 1201 1151 1217 1209 1199 1220 1202 1203 1205 12 1147 1229 1212 1110 1096 1046 1108 1058 1124 1118 1106 1127 1109 1110 TOTALS 11418 14761 14264 14165 14169 14189 14259 14268 14329 14325 14330 14346 14342 14357 Percento(Gain (025)% (082)% (059)% 003% 014% 049% 007% 042% (003)% 004.1. 011% (002)% 011% Pupd Gam (37) (117) (9% 4 19 70 10 60 (4) 5 16 (3) 15 TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS 36 Basedon6Y4ar Hstom p008-07 ■4 Papa 34 4111!2007 ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PR OJ PROD PROD PRO. PROJ PROJ PROD PRO' PROJ PROD GRPDE 00107 C7100 05109 09!10 10111 11112 12/13 13114 14J 15 15115 1817 17/18 18119 191!0 KOO 941 960 979 996 1017 1036 1055 1074 1093 1112 1131 1150 1169 1180 1 1012 1000 1019 1038 1057 1076 1095 1114 1133 1152 1171 1190 1209 1228 2 1002 1023 1011 1030 1049 1068 1007 1100 1125 1144 1163 1182 1201 1220 3 1031 1025 1045 1034 1053 1072 1091 1110 1129 1140 1167 1186 1205 1224 4 1049 1051 1045 1066 1054 1073 1092 1111 1130 1149 1168 1187 1206 1225 5 998 1079 1081 1075 1095 1084 1103 1122 1141 1160 1179 1198 1217 1238 6 1058 1015 1095 1098 1092 1113 1101 1120 1139 1150 1177 1198 1215 1234 7 1014 1068 1026 1106 1109 1102 1123 1111 1130 1149 1160 1187 1208 1225 6 1072 1033 1087 1045 1125 1128 1121 1142 1131 1150 1169 1188 1207 1226 9 1372 1427 1389 1443 1400 1481 1483 1477 1498 1488 1505 1524 1543 1562 10 1400 1246 1301 1262 1316 1274 1354 1357 1350 1371 1360 1378 1398 1417 11 1322 1259 1105 1160 1121 1178 1133 1214 1216 1210 1230 1219 4238 1257 12 1147 1260 1198 1043 1099 1060 1114 1071 1152 1154 1148 1169 1157 1176 TOTALS 14410 1A447 14382 14399 14589 1 14742 14954 15130 153fi8 15544 15737 15955 16171 15418 Percent of Gam 020% (045)% 0 12% 1 32% 1 05% 1 43 % 1 18% 1 57% 1 15% 1 24% 1 39% 1 36% 153% PLpll Gam 29 (65) 17 180 154 211 176 238 176 193 218 216 247 p008-07 ■4 Papa 34 4111!2007 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2006 1 1012 995 969 986 1007 2 1002 1022 1005 980 997 3 1031 1021 1042 1024 999 4 1049 1041 1031 1052 1034 6 999 1064 1056 1046 1066 6 1056 1008 1074 1066 1066 7 1014 1076 1026 1092 1084 6 1072 1023 1084 1034 1100 9 1372 1358 1309 1370 1320 10 14DD 1298 12114 1235 1296 11 1322 1305 1203 1189 1139 12 1147 1229 1212 1110 1096 TOTALS 1 14416 1 14355 1 14227 1 14137 1 1414i, TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS 3 16/17 1 17118 1 1 &19 1 19/20 1008 ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROD PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ 1018 1018 PROD PROJ PROD PROD GRADE 06/07 07/08 1016 1037 1037 11/12 12/13 73/74 14/15 15116 16/17 1009 1026 1047 1047 941 916 933 954 954 1049 1024 1D41 1062 1062 1077 1059 1034 1051 1072 1072 1013 1074 1094 1077 1052 1069 1090 1090 1002 1023 1092 1083 1103 1086 1060 1077 1098 1099 1386 1378 1368 1389 1372 1349 1363 1364 1385 1246 1312 1304 1295 1315 1298 1272 1289 1310 1201 1151 1217 1209 1199 1220 1202 1177 1194 1046 1108 1056 1124 1118 1106 1127 1109 1084 P00"7 44 Page 35 4111n007 ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROD PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROD PROJ PROD PROD GRADE 06/07 07/08 0&09 09110 10/11 11/12 12/13 73/74 14/15 15116 16/17 17/18 18119 1980 KDG 941 916 933 954 954 1 1012 1000 975 992 1013 1013 2 1002 1023 1011 986 1003 1024 1024 3 1031 1025 1045 1034 1008 1025 1046 1017 4 1049 1051 1045 1066 1054 1029 1046 1067 1087 5 998 1079 1061 1075 1095 1084 1058 1075 1006 1097 6 1058 1015 1096 1095 1092 1113 1101 1076 1093 1114 1114 7 1014 1088 1026 1106 1109 1102 1123 1111 1086 1103 1124 1124 8 1072 1033 1087 1045 1125 1128 1121 1142 1131 1105 1122 1143 I1H 9 1372 1427 1389 1443 1400 1481 1483 1477 1498 1486 1461 1478 1499 1499 10 1400 1246 1301 1262 1316 1274 1354 1357 1350 1371 1380 1334 1351 1372 11 1322 1259 1105 1160 1121 1176 1133 1214 1215 1210 1230 1219 1193 1210 12 1147 1260 1198 1043 1099 1060 1114 1071 1152 1154 1146 1189 1157 1132 TOTALS 14416 1440) 14291 14263 14390 Pen;enl DI Gain (011)% (078)% (019)% 089% Pupil Gain (15) 112) (28) 127 P00"7 44 Page 35 4111n007 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2006 ABLE LE K-5 nn14Yn2rim inn GRADE 06/07 07108 OB109 09110 10111 11/12 12/13 13114 14115 15!16 16/17 17118 18/19 19/20 1 1012 995 996 997 998 999 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1008 1009 2 1002 1022 1005 1006 1007 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1016 1017 1018 3 1031 1021 1042 1024 1028 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1033 1034 1035 1036 4 1049 1041 1031 1052 1034 1035 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1044 1045 5 996 1064 1056 1046 1066 1049 1050 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1059 groan o au Pupil Gam 52 112) (3) 6 (11) 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 TABLE K-5PROJECTIONS 3E6 Based 018 Year Hiabn GRADE 06107 07108 06109 09110 10/11 11/12 12113 13/14 14115 15116 16/17 17118 18/19 1980 1 1012 1000 1019 1038 1057 1076 1095 1114 1133 1152 1171 1190 1209 1228 2 1002 1023 1011 1030 1049 1068 1087 1106 1125 1144 1163 1182 1201 1220 3 1031 1025 1045 1034 1053 1072 1091 1110 1129 1146 1167 1186 1205 1224 4 1049 1051 1045 1066 1064 1073 1092 1111 1130 1149 1168 1187 1206 1225 5 998 1079 1081 1075 1095 1084 1103 1122 1141 1160 1179 1198 1217 1236 ercen o avDin Pupil Gain 105 43 60 85 83 114 114 114 114 114 114 114 114 TABLE 3E 13A K-5PROJECTIGNS Basad on Birth Rates & 13 Year Nisax 15R01 GRADE 06107 07108 08108 08/10 10/11 11112 12113 13114 14115 15/16 16117 17/18 18119 PRII 1920 K 1 941 1012 915 995 933 969 954 986 954 1007 1008 2 1002 1022 1005 960 997 1018 1018 3 1031 1021 1042 1024 999 1016 1037 1037 4 1049 1041 1031 1052 1034 1009 1026 1047 1047 5 998 1064 1056 1046 1066 1049 1024 1041 1062 1062 ercen o e Pupil Gain 26 (23i 6 16 3E 8A BaW do Birth Rate* & 5 Year Hi*br GRADE 06/07 07108 08109 09/10 10111 11112 12117 13114 14115 15/1fi 16117 17/18 18119 1920 1 1012 1000 975 992 1013 1013 2 1002 1023 1011 986 1003 1024 1024 3 1031 1025 1045 1034 1008 1025 1046 1047 4 1049 1051 1045 1066 1054 1029 1046 1067 1087 5 998 1079 1081 1075 1095 1084 1058 1075 1096 1097 rllr(aFll o air Pupil Gam 60 (3) 15 22 pgo"7 >6a Page 30 41112007 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2006 )J PRO' PROJ PROD PROJ PROD )J PRO' 13 13114 PROD 14115 )J 13 PROD 13/14 PRO' 14115 PROJ 15/16 PROJ 16117 PROD 17118 PROJ 18/19 PROD 1920 9 4 a 1061 1077 1103 1062 1078 1086 1063 1079 1087 1064 1081 1088 1065 1082 1089 1066 1083 1090 7D68 1084 1091 6 3240 3226 3229 3233 3236 3240 3243 )% 1 013% 4 (046)% (151 D11% 4 011% 3 011% 3 011% 4 011% 4 )J PRO' PROJ PROD PROJ PROD )J PRO' 13 13114 PROD 14115 7J 13 PRO' 13114 PROJ 14/15 PROJ 15/16 PROD 18!17 PROD 77/18 PROJ 18119 PROD 1920 11 3 1 1120 1111 1142 1139 1130 1131 1158 1149 1150 1177 1188 1169 1196 1187 1168 1215 1206 1207 1234 1225 1226 6 3374 3400 3457 1 3514 1 3571 1 3628 3685 % 84% 28 78% 26 168% 57 165% 57 162% 57 160% 57 157% 57 )J PRO' PROJ PROD PROJ PROD )J PRO' 13 13114 PROD 14115 PROD 15116 PRO' 16117 PROD 17/18 PROJ 1&19 PROD 1920 i9 1034 14 1077 13 1103 1051 1052 1086 1072 AD69 1060 1072 1090 1077 1090 1098 1099 16 3214 3188 3201 3239 13 1111 1)% (069)% 1 122) (080)% (26) 040% 13 120% 39 !1 )J PRO' PROJ PROD PROJ PROD PROJ PROJ 13 13114 14115 15116 16/17 17/18 1&19 1920 N 1076 1093 1114 1114 13 1111 1086 1103 1124 1124 !1 1142 1131 1105 1122 1143 1144 16 3329 3309 3322 3361 1% (049)% (D60)% 038% 116% (16) (20) 13 39 '89e 37 4/118007 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2006 TABLE SR HIGH PROJECTIONS 3SH 6 ACTUAL PROJ PROD PROJ PROJ PROD PR OJ PROJ PROD PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROD GRADE 08/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15!16 76/17 1 17118 18119 /9120 9 1372 1358 1309 1370 1320 1388 1378 1358 1359 1372 1373 1374 1375 1376 10 1400 1298 1254 1235 1296 1246 1312 1304 1295 1315 1298 1299 1300 1301 11 1322 1305 1203 1189 1139 1201 1151 1217 1209 1199 1220 1202 1203 1205 12 1147 1229 1212 1110 1096 1046 1108 1058 1124 1116 1106 1127 1109 1110 9-12 TOTI 5241 1 5190 1 5007 1 4903 1 4857 1 4880 1 4949 1 4948 1 5016 1 5001 1 4996 1 5001 1 4988 4992 Pomen1 of Gain (0 96)% (3 52)% (2 07)% (1 05)% 059% 1 43% (003)% 1 38% (C 2D)% (0 11)% 0 11% 1027)% 0 1 Pupil Gam (51) (163) (104) (52) 28 70 (2) 68 1151 (5) 5 (14) 5 3SH 6 Balled on 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJPROJ I PR OJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PR OJ PROD PROJ , GRADE 06/07 07108 I 08/09 I 09110 10111 11112 12113 1 31 14 14/15 15116 16117 17116 16/19 1980 9 1372 1427 1309 1443 1400 1481 1483 1477 1498 1486 1505 1524 1543 1562 10 1400 1246 1301 1262 1316 1274 1364 1357 1350 1371 1360 1379 1396 1417 11 1322 1259 1105 1160 1121 1176 1133 1214 1216 1210 1230 1219 1238 1257 I Panwn(ot Cram (092)% 1386)% (167)% 057% 106% 190% 067% 190% C10% 042% 090% 086% 142% GRADE ( 06107 ) 07/08 1 08/09 1 09/10 1 10111 1 11112 1 12113 1 13/14 1 14/15 1 15116 I 10117 17118 16119 I 19/10 9 1372 1358 1309 1370 1320 1388 1378 1368 1389 1372 1346 1363 1304 1385 10 1400 1298 1284 1235 1296 1245 1312 1304 1295 1315 1298 1272 1289 1310 11 1322 1305 1203 1109 1139 1201 1151 1217 1209 1199 1220 1202 1177 1194 12 1147 1229 1212 1110 1096 1046 1108 1058 1124 1116 1106 1127 1109 1084 1-12 TOT 5241 1 5190 1 5007 1 4903 4851 4880 4949 1 4948 5016 5001 4969 4964 4959 4972 Percent of Gain (098)% (352)% (207)% (105)% 058% 143% (003)% 138% 1 (064(% (1 (Q 09)'A 026% Pupil Gam (51) (183) (104) (52) 28 70 (2) 68 (15) (32) (5) (5) 13 TABLE SR HIGH PROJECTIONS 3SH 6A Balled on Birth Rates b 6 Year Histary I PI GRADE A06107L 0700 08/09 09/10 POnt 1R/OJ Pu113 PROJ T P4105 P5/106 16/0J PROS P81119 9/10 9 1372 1427 1389 1443 1400 1481 1483 1477 1496 1486 1461 1478 1499 1499 10 1400 1246 1301 1282 1316 1274 1354 1357 1350 1371 1360 1334 1351 1372 11 1322 1259 1105 1160 1121 1176 1133 1214 1218 1210 1230 1219 1193 1210 12 1147 1260 1198 1043 1099 1060 1114 1071 1152 1154 1148 1169 1157 1132 1-12 TOTI 5241 1 5193 1 4992 1 4908 1 4937 1 4990 1 5085 1 5119 5216 5221 1 5199 1 5199 5200 5213 Pe Mof Gam (092)% (386)% (167)% 057% 108% 190% 067% 190% 010% (D 43)10. 001% 002% 025% Pupil Gain (48)_ _(201) (84) 28 53 95 34 97 5 (23) 1 1 13 P1106.07 xis Page 36 4/1112007 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS • October 2006 TABLE OJECTION COMPARISONS 4 BY GRADE GROUP KINDERGARTEN ACTUAL PR OJPR OJ PR OJ PROJ PROD PROD PROJ PROD PROD PROD PROJ PROJ PROD GRADE 08107 07/08 08!09 09110 10/11 1 111121 12/13 13!14 14!15 15116 16117 17/16 18/19 19@0 E 13 941 942 943 945 946 947 948 949 950 952 953 954 955 956 E 6 941 960 979 998 1017 1036 1055 1074 1D93 1112 1131 1150 1169 1168 E 13A 941 916 933 954 954 E 6A 941 918 933 954 954 GRD I--GR05 14189 14259 ACTUAL PRO) PROD PROD PROD PROD PRO' PRO' PRO! PRO) PROJ PROD PROD PROD GRADE 06/07 07/08 08109 09/10 10/11 11112 12113 13/14 14115 15/16 16117 17118 IN19 19!20 E 13 5092 5143 5130 5125 5132 5119 5125 5131 5137 5143 5149 5154 5160 5166 E 6 5092 5178 5202 5243 5309 5373 5468 5563 5658 5753 5848 5943 8038 6133 E 13A 5092 5143 5103 5086 5104 E 6A 5092 5178 5156 5152 $174 GRD 0—GRD 8 ACTUAL PROJ PROD PROJ PROD PRO' PRO' PROD PROD PROJ PROD PROD PROJ PROJ GRADE 08/07 07/08 OB/O9 09170 10/71 11112 12113 13114 14115 15118 16/17 17118 18119 1920 MS 13 31" 3108 3184 3192 3240 3243 3236 3240 3226 3229 3233 3236 3240 3243 MS 6 3144 3111 3209 3249 3326 3343 3346 3374 3400 3457 3514 3571 3826 3685 MS 13A 3144 3106 3184 3192 3240 3243 3236 3214 3188 3201 3239 MS 6A 3144 3117 3209 3249 3326 3343 3346 3329 3309 3322 3381 GRO 9 -- GRD 12 ACTUAL PROD PROD PROD PROD PROJ PROD PRO' PROD PROJ PROD PROD PROJ PROD GRADE 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11112 12113 13114 14/15 15/16 161,7 17/78 18119 1920 SH 13 5241 5190 5007 4903 4851 4880 4949 4946 5016 5001 4996 5001 4988 4992 SH 6 5241 5193 4992 4908 4937 4990 5085 5119 5216 5221 5243 5290 5336 5412 SH 13A 5241 5190 5007 4903 4651 4880 4949 4948 5018 5001 4989 4964 4959 4972 SH GA 5241 5193 4992 4908 4937 4990 5085 5119 5216 5221 5199 5199 5200 5213 ISTRICT TOTALS Pry08-07 xis Page 39 4/11/2007 I A I I I ROI 10111 PR02 121013 P31O4 P41105 PRO ROJ 3RADE 06/07L 07 08 08/0OI 9 I 091010 I I I 11&106 I p8/107 I 17 S I P8/019 I P920 13 14416 14381 14264 14185 14169 14189 14259 14258 14329 14325 14330 14346 14342 14357 8 14416 14447 14382 14399 14589 14742 14954 15130 15368 15544 15737 15955 16171 16418 13A 14418 14355 14227 14137 14149 6A 14418 14403 14291 14283 14390 Pry08-07 xis Page 39 4/11/2007 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS -October 2006 TABLE PROJECTION COMPARISONS TA: BY GRADE GROUP Total = Octotie 1 Actual Count AND Projected Counts Pry 3 13 - 13 YEAR HISTORY 8 Using Average Kdg Increase DIn- Number Projectlonls under(-)orover Actual Pr)36 6YEAR HISTORY 8 Using Average Kdg Increase % = Percent Projection Is under( ) or over Actual Prj 3 13A 13 YEAR HISTORY 6 King Cry Birth Rates Prj 3 5A - 6 YEAR HISTORY 8 King Cry Birth Rates Grades K-5 Total 1994-95 Diff % I Total 1995-96 Dln % I Total 1995-97 DIB % I Total 199798 DIB X I Total 1998-99 DIB % ACTUAL 5685 xxx xxx 5729 xxx xxx 5799 xxx xxx 5946 xxx xxx 5837 xxx xxx Pq 3E 13 5705 20 035% 5754 25 044% 5843 44 075% 5928 (18) (030)% 6049 212 (054)% Pq 3E 6 5743 58 102% 5746 17 0 30% 5921 22 038% 5904 (42) (071)% 6026 189 (D 96)% Pq 3E 13 5676 (9) (015)% 5932 203 354% 5853 54 093% 5783 (163) (274)% 5936 99 (264)% Pq 3E 6A 5720 35 062% 5932 203 354% $798 (1) (002)% 5768 (178) (299)% 5917 90 (293)% Grades 6-8 Total 1994-95 Diff % I Total 199596 Din % Total 1996 97 DIB % I Total 1997-98 DiB % I Total 1998-99 DIB % ACTUAL 2760 xxx xxx 2755 xxx ioric 2799 xxx xxx 2811 xxx xxx 2860 xxx xxx Pry 3E 13 2817 57 2 07% 2796 41 1 49% 2875 76 2 72% 2820 9 032% 2910 50 (264)'/. Pq 3E 5 2806 46 1 67% 2765 10 035% 2848 49 1 75% 2789 (22) (078)% 2878 18 (270)% Pq 3E 13 2817 57 207% 2796 41 149% 2875 76 272% 2820 9 032% 2910 50 (264)% Pip 3E 6A 28011 46 1 57% 2765 10 036% 2848 49 175% 2789 (22) (0 78)% 1 2878 18 (270)% Graces 9.12 Total 1994-95 DIB % Total 1995-96 On % Total 199697 13,11 % Total 1997-98 Diff % Total 1908-99 tm % ACTUAL 3357 xxx xxx 3629 xxx xxx 3843 xxx xxx 4012 xxx xxx 4245 xxx xxx Pq 3E 13 3442 85 253% 3663 34 094% 3768 (75) (195)% 4092 80 199% 4110 (135) 274% Pq 3E 6 3434 T7 229% 3540 11 0 3D% 3750 (93) (242)% 4069 57 1 42% 4103 (142) 151% Pq 3E 13 3442 85 253% 3663 34 094% 3768 (75) (1 95)% 3983 (29) (072)% 4110 (135) 274% P03EGA 3434 77 229% 3640 11 030% 3750 93 242% 3970 (42) (105)% 4103 (142) 151% All Grades Total 1994-951995-96 Dib % Total Din % Total 1995-97 Diff Y. T0W1 1997 90 DiB % Total 1998-99 OM % ACTUAL 11802 xxx xxx 12113 xxx xxx 12441 xxx xxx 12769 xxx xxx 12942 xxx xxx Pq 3E 13 11964 162 137% 12213 100 083% 12488 45 036% 12840 71 056% 13069 127 (030)% Pq 3E6 11983 181 153% 12151 38 031% 12419 (22) (018)% 12762 (7) (005)% 13007 65 (082)% Pq 3E 13 11935 133 1 13% 12391 278 230% 12490 55 0 44% 12586 (183) (143)% 12956 14 (144)% Pq 3E 6A 11960 158 134% 12337 224 185% 12396 (45) (036)% 12527 (242) (190)% 12898 (44) (169% pript Txls Page40 U7112007 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS • October 2606 TA13LE 5 1 PROJECTION COMPARISONS BY GRADE GROUP (Condoned) Total Oclober 1 Actual Count ANO Projected Counts Prj 3 13 - 13 YEAR HISTORY 6 Using Average Mg Increase DH = Number Projeclron isunder( )orover Actual Pry 36 - 6YEAR HISTORY 6 Using Average Kdg Increase % e Percent Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3 13A 13 YEAR HISTORY S. King Cy Binh Rates P036A- 6YEAR HISTORY 6 King Cry 6&nn Rates Grades K-8 Total 1999-00 Cliff% % Total 2000-01 Diff % Total 2001-02 Dib % Total 2002-032003-04 Dib % Total Diff % ACTUAL 5856 UK xxx 5844 lorx xxx 5914 UK xxx 5741 xlur xzx 5774 xxx UX Pg 3E 13 5778 (78) 315% 5811 (33) (056)% 5627 (87) (147)% 5723 (18) (031)% 5655 (119) ;049)% P03E6 5735 (121) 274% 5664 (180) (308)% 5802 (112) (189)% 5735 (8) (010)% 5682 (112) (034)% PO 3E 13 5811 (45) 151% 5919 75 128% 5839 (75) (127)% 5743 2 003% 5805 (169) (124)% Prj 3E BA 5785 (71) 115% 5895 51 087% 5631 (83) (140)% 5778 35 081% 5631 143) (081)% Grades 7-9 Total 1999-00201)"1 DR % Total Diff % Total 200102 Diff % Total 2002-03 OR% % Total 2003-04 Dib % ACTUA- 2970 x x xxx 2980 UK UK 3049 Uor UK 3151 UK UK 3294 UK xxx Pr) 3E 13 2927 (80) (262)% 3023 43 1 44% 3025 (24) (070)% 3185 34 1 08% 3214 (80) (886)% Prj 3E8 2895 (75) (246)% 3009 29 097% 3011 (38) (125)% 3192 41 130% 3216 (78) (606)% Pg 3E 13 2927 (80) (262)% 3023 43 144% 3025 (24) (0791% 3185 34 1 08% 3214 (80) (8 8B)% Pr 3E 6A 2895 (75) (246)% 3009 29 097% 3011 (38) (125)% 3192 41 130% 3216 (78) (806)% Grades 10-12 - Total 1999-00 DM % Total 2000-01 Diff % Total 200142 DiR °A I Total 2002-03 DM % I Total 2003-04 Diff % ACTUAL 4225 xxx Kxx 4311 xxx UK 4498 UK Kxx 4535 xxx xxx 4634 UK xax Prj 3E 13 4301 76 (032)% 4369 58 135% 4455 (43) (096)% 4577 42 093% 4630 (4) 590% Pry 3E6 4313 88 (149)% 4394 83 193% 4476 (22) (049)% 4594 59 130% 4839 5 369% PO 3E 13 4301 76 (032)% 4389 58 1 35% 4455 (43) (095)% 4577 42 093% 4630 (4) 590% p 3E SA 4313 88 (149)% 4394 83 1 93% 4476 22) (049)% 4594 59 130% 4639 5 369% All Graders Total 1999-00 Um % I Total 2000-01 13d1 % I Total 2001.02 Diff % I Total 2002-03 Diff % j Total 2003-04 Diff % ACTUAL 13051 xxx UK 13135 xxx xxx 13461 UK xxx 13427 Kxx x14 13672 UK X= orj 3E 13 13006 (45) 097% 13203 68 052% 13307 (164) (114)% 13485 58 043% 13499 (173) (127)% Pr)3E6 12943 (108) 050% 1308T (65) (052)% 13289 (172) (126)% 13521 94 070% 13542 (130) (096)% Prj 3E 13 13039 (12) 010% 13311 176 1 34% 13319 (142) (1 05)% 13505 78 058% 13447 (225) (1 65)% PO 3E 6A 12993 (58) (033)% 13296 163 124% 13318 (143) (1 08)% 13562 135 101% 13510 (162) (1 18)% PgoS-07 Kis Page 41 4111/2007 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2DOG TABLE PROJECTK)N COMPARISONS 5 BY GRADE GROUP (Continued) Total = October 1 Actual Count AND Projected Counts Pry 3 13. 13 YEAR HISTORY 8 Using Average Kdg Increase Diff = Number Prolechon is under(-) or over Actual Pq 3 8 - 6 YEAR HISTORY 6 Using Average Kdg Increase % = Percent Projection is unded-) or over Actual Prj 3 13A 13 YEAR HISTORY 8 King Cry Binh Rates Pq 3 6A - 6 YEAR HISTORY 8 King Cly SAW, Rales Grades K-6 Total 2004-05 Diff % Total 2005-06 Diff % Total 2006-07Average Oil % Diff Average % ACTUAL 5735 xxx xxx 5887 xxx lax 6033 icrx xxx xxx W Pry 3E 13 5761 26 045% 5750 (137) (233)% 5871 (162) (261 (25) (027)% Pry 3E6 5621 66 150% 5795 (92) (156)% 5921 (112) (11 (31) (D 35)% Pq 3E 13 5709 (26) (045)% 5750 (137) (233)% $869 (164) (272)% (27) (041 P93EOA 5756 21 037% 5784 (103) (175)% 5912 (121) (201)% (21) (037)% Grades 7-9 Total 2004-05 Ott! % I Total 2005-06 Diff % Total 2006.07 Doff % Average Oil Average % ACTUAL 3274 xxxxxx ax 3169 "x oix 3144 xxx xxx xxx xxx Pq 3E 13 3295 21 064% 3132 (37) (117)% 3131 (13) (041J% 7 (052)°4 Pq 3E6 3311 37 113% 3137 (32) 1 3146 2 006% (1) 1 (054)% Pq 3E 13 3295 21 664% 3132 (37) 1117)% 3131 113) to 11 7 (052)% Pq 3E 6A 3311 37 113% 3137 (32) (11 3145 2 0D6% (1) (1 Grades 10-12 Total 201 Dia % J Tole) 2005-06 Dib % 1 Total 2006-07 D,ff % Average Diff Average % ACTUAL 4663 xxx ax $032 xxx xxx 5241 xxx xxx xxx xxx P93E 13 4783 120 257% 4896 (134) (266)% 5085 (156) (296)% (4) (007)% Pq 3E6 4769 108 227% 4860 (152) (302)% 5086 (155) (296)% (B) 10. Pq 3E 13 4783 120 257% 4896 (134) (286)% 6085 (156) (298)% (12) (026)% Pq 3E 6A 4769 106 227% 4880 (152) (302)% 5086 (155) (296)% (14) All Grades Total 21 Dib % 1 Total 2005-06 Dib % 1 Total 2005-07 Diff % Average Ddl Avenge % ACTUAL 13672 xxx xxx 14086 xxx xxx 14418 Mx xxx xxx xxx Pq 3E 13 13839 167 1 22% 13780 (308) (219)% 14087 (331) (2 30)% (16) (007)% Pq 3E6 13901 229 167% 13812 1276) (196}% 14153 (265) 1184)% 134) (022)% Pq 3E 13 13787 115 084% 13780 (3061 (2 19)% 14085 (333) (2 31)Y. (27) (026)% Pq 3E BA 13836 164 120% 13601 (267) (204)% 14144 (274) (190)Y Historical Deta is grouped by K - 5, 1 9-12 articulation pattem Articulation pattern has no numeric impact on efficacy of projection mi pg06-07 x15 Page 42 4/11/2007 Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections -October 2006 Updated March 2007 BASE DATA - BUILDOUT SCHEDULE Student Generation Factors 75 ASSUMPTIONS 0 2001 Auburn SingleMuh- I 0 1 Uses 13olol Build Out Estimates received from Lakeland Developer Other Moldl` mI s 165 Family Faml fa Takes area labeled Lakeland Future slated for 2006 and divides across 2007-10 0 Elementary 03120 00460 2 Student Generation Faetorare updated Auburn data for 2007 as allowed per King County Ordinance 315 Middle School 01270 00190 3 Includes Lea Hill known developments and Non -Lakeland developments ($ee Development Growth) 0 Senior Hi h 01610 00340 3a Takes area labeled Kersey Project slated for 2005 and divides across 2008.13 Total 06000 00990 3b Takes area labeled Kent Impoundment and projects across 2007.2012 1 10evolopmont 1 2007 1 2008 1 2009 1 2010 J 2011 1 2012 1 2013 1 Total Lakeland Single Family Units 220 155 155 160 690 Lea Hill Area 108 109 182 182 182 182 945 ether Rmnle FAm11V Unds 60 128 171 178 178 178 60 953 Sr High Pupils 9-12 62 83 � B2 � 84 � 58 � 58 J 10 � 417_ � r Total K-12 233 i 235 305 312 � 216 216 X1553 Lakeland Multi Family Units 150 75 25 0 0 0 0 250 Other Moldl` mI s 165 165 60 57 0 0 0 447 Total MUlti Famil Units 315 1 240 85 1 57 0 0 0 697 Buddouts March 07 As 44 O O N Q1 a O U 0 N c 0r- - o N N D t d U C N E d O m C W n 0 7 O V e e i n M M uN 0 N V V m n m m 0 N o e T T T < T e �` O N e M ornaorLnovLnmTm'oTo N O T N IO Q1 N V N r cp m N N m T T T T r T T T T T OT N N M N w c0 cD rnO 00 _ M Omi m Ori m O O0 O? � O 0) r tn0 O r- O N n rn M O OW m< r-- n �mNm`<' mmm�wm°'wmrn o< N O oImn—rD mnto-mo O n T r r n m N n < n m r r 0) O C6 ((pp M m m M V a M M n CO r O m o cq M V V V m O (S Ir N OASU)0 m p 7 a n ci TrT mm O w m m N N N 0 N N Iq m N O N T N Q O N 0 a aa 0 0 V N O (n < r r n CDm N N m ' N N O N p r < r y� N C e e s o a � r°ii o vmi A T�� O V N t+� �- Z > La cO m C T .0 `A eee a T'e eV`e•;e= in e eDeID r o Q W N c0 Q! m O N �n ID c0 cD r , M, G i G/ 7 J fD 10 c0 n 1� n n 1� n r Oi h 1� O O J Q. d eC h N O T °i 0 Q O. � w `0 0 Q OLn moNnm ov m n o M �i m r Ncoomm N r } m m m o 0 0 0 0' O o m d m Q W Z a cV Q Q �Q T N co V to f0 I�. OD 0 N W a g O O F e e e e o e e e �` e ornaorLnovLnmTm'oTo m 00 O N rn N n O r- m n n rn M O m m< r-- n O 00 m n T r r n m O V1 n < n m r r M m n T M m n CO r O m o r 0 (S Ir OASU)0 'n n ci TrT mm c w 0) *�cpp W m 0 a 0 0 0 V N O (n < r r c0 > Y o co c (c�� pp y r O T�� r N V a ul Mcpp h N O h�pp O r T r N o m�pp � oa O O g O p M 7 a �+ P N N m n O V O r N r- N Q am N m { O{pp N m 0 N 0 M r m V (O N UO O p m m (O M N O Cl y CY{ O 0 4 N N Op cpp� n m r N d ONi 01 0� OVi p T M T O V N O M m o" c C A M N O 0 C3 o '� oE M N ID V O T N l0 N V V M n M N� 4 o rn o 0 o v N m C) y N n .` ^O r Q O c C N W o,000V oo`o� o y c+ = C o m4a3cov` O 07 O - Q 0 C T ' Lry J v (7 m M (O � •- N M V in (O n m O) O T N m F Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections -October 2006 I lnrtafcA U.wh 2nn7 TABLE4 Naw Projects -Pupil Projection Cumulative- -� ND 313 b Grade Level Updated March 2007 Uses a'cohort survival' GRADE 2008-07 20D7-08 2008-09 1 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 model assuming 100% of Adual Projected Proected Projected Protected P eded Pro eded Proceed previous yearnew KDG 941 960 978 1000 1022 1037 1053 1056 enrollees move to the next 1 1012 1013 1032 1056 1079 1095 1111 1115 grade level 2 1002 1041 1042 1065 1088 1104 1120 1124 3 1031 1040 1079 1084 1107 1124 1140 1144 Kindergarten calculates 4 1049 1060 1069 1112 1118 1135 1152 1155 previous years number plus 5 998 1084 1095 1109 1153 1152 1169 1173 6033, 6197 6295 1 6424 1 6567 1 6647 1 6745 f 6768 current generation based on 6 1058 1028 1114 1130 1145 1161 1161 1185 % of total enrollment Other 7 1014 1096 1066 1156 1172 1179 1216 1201 use 100% cohort survival 8 1072 1043 1125 1099 1190 1198 1206 1229 3144 3167 1 3305 1 3385 1 3506 1 3569 1 3602 1 3614 9 1372 1385 1362 1456 1439 1527 1542 1536 10 1400 1322 1332 1311 1402 1372 1458 1453 11 1322 1326 1244 1255 1231 1310 1277 1346 12 1147 1248 1249 1169 1178 1144 1221 1173 5241 5281 5188 5192 5250 5353 5497 5508 Total 14416 14645 14787 15001 15323 1 15558 15844 15890 %of change 158% 097% 145% 215% 154% 184% 029% change +/- 227 142 214 322 235 286 46 TABLE 5 New Prolects - Pupil Projection Cumulative ND 3.6 6 Grade Level Updated March 2007 Uses a 'cohort survival' GRADE 2005-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010.11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 model assuming 100% of Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected P eded P eded previous year new KDG 941 977 1014 1053 1093 1126 1160 1181 enrollees move to the next 1 1012 1019 1056 1097 1136 1172 1206 1226 grade level 2 1002 1041 1048 1089 1130 1164 1198 1219 3 1031 1043 1082 1093 1134 1159 1203 1224 Kindergarten calculates 4 1049 1071 1083 1126 1138 1173 1207 1229 previous years number plus 5 998 1098 1120 1137 1182 1187 1222 1243 6033 6250 8403 6595 6815 6990 7196 7325 current generation based on 6 1058 1036 1136 1162 1180 1217 1222 1244 % of total enrollment Other 7 1014 1088 1066 1170 1197 1207 1244 1236 use 100% cohort survival a 1072 1054 1126 1110 1215 1234 1244 1268 3144 3178 3330 3442 3592 3658 3711 3746 9 1372 1455 1443 1529 1519 1622 1547 1644 10 1400 1270 1349 1339 1422 1400 1500 1506 11 1322 1280 1146 1227 1213 1285 1259 1343 12 1147 1279 1235 1103 1181 1157 1227 1187 5241 5284 5173 5187 5335 1 5483 I 5633 5679 Total 14418 1 14711 14905 15235 -15742 18112 16539 18752 %of change 1 203% 1329 265% 128% change +/- 293 194 330 506 370 427 212 Buwldouts March 07 As 46 % of change I 139% 1 089% 1 152% 1 221% uses 9 Vorlort survival, GRADE BUlldout Data for Enrollment Protections -October 2006 2007-U8 2006-U9 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 U dated March 2007 model assuming 100% of Actual Projected TABLE6 New Developments- Pupil Projection Cumulative Proectetl Pro eGed Pro acted Proech previous year new KDG 941 R03 t3A b Grade level Updated March 2007 1009 1030 enrollees move to the next 1 Uses a'cohort survival' GRADE 2006-07 2007 -OB 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012.13 2013-1 model assuming 100% of 1041 Actual Pro acted Pro acted Proecled Projected Pro acted Projected Proecte previous year new KDG 941 933 967 1009 1030 1162 Kindergarten calculates 4 enrollees move to the next 1 1012 1013 1006 1045 1068 1104 birth rate average plus 5 grade level 2 1002 1041 1042 1038 1077 1113 1129 8033' 3 1031 1040 1079 1064 1061 1113 1149 1152 Kindergarten calculates 4 1049 1060 1069 1112 1118 1108 1141 1165 birth rate average plus 5 996 1064 1095 1109 1153 1152 1143 1162 1072 1054 6033 6171 6257 6396 8547 5590 4561 3419 current generation based on 6 1058 1026 1114 1130 1145 1181 1161 1158 % of total enrollment Other 7 1014 1096 1066 1156 1172 1179 1216 1201 use 100% cohort survival 8 1072 1043 1125 1099 1190 1198 1206 1229 1322 1280 3144 3167 3305 1 3305 1 3508 r 3559 3602 3588 1147 9 1372 1385 1362 1456 1439 1527 1542 1536 10 1400 1322 1332 1311 1402 1372 1458 1453 11 1322 1326 1244 1255 1231 1310 1277 1346 12 1147 1248 1249 1169 1176 1144 1221 1173 % of change I 139% 1 089% 1 152% 1 221% uses 9 Vorlort survival, GRADE 2006-07 2007-U8 2006-U9 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013.1 model assuming 100% of Actual Projected P acted Projected Proectetl Pro eGed Pro acted Proech previous year new KDG 941 933 967 1009 1030 enrollees move to the next 1 1012 1019 1011 1050 1094 1109 grade level 2 1002 1041 1048 1044 1083 1119 1135 3 1031 1043 1082 1093 1090 1122 1159 1162 Kindergarten calculates 4 1049 1071 1083 1126 1138 1128 1161 1184 birth rate average plus 5 998 1098 1120 1137 1162 1187 1177 1197 8033' 6205 1 6312 1 6460 1 6617 current generation based on 6 1058 1036 1136 1162 1180 1217 1222 1200 % of total enrollment Other 7 1014 1088 1066 1170 1197 1207 1244 1236 use 100% cohort survival a 1072 1054 1129 1110 1215 1234 1244 1268 3144 3178 1 3330 1 3442 1 3592 1 3659 3711 3703 Based on 6 year history 9 1372 1455 1443 1529 1519 1622 1647 1644 10 1400 1270 1349 1339 1422 1400 1500 1506 11 1322 1280 1146 1227 1213 1285 1259 1343 12 1147 1279 1235 1103 1181 1157 1227 1187 %otchange 172% 1 100% changer- 249 147 autl4ouls March 07 We 47 Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey Auburn School District Development Growth since 1/1/02 March, 2007 SINGLE FAMILY March 2007 O O O O M m 0 0 O000MV C)0 w OOOr Me -MN �OOr-:OaOoo O O O O T O O N O O t0 O41) Cl O V LL y 0 0 (V 0 0 0 0 0 C 2 0 0 0 O O O O O m O O M d OOGOOr-OOM (� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d D 7 O O O tO M O M OO(O(OO�r 00 ECD00TNTu�T W0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O M (O i O O H O O M O N O O t0 N O T (O M (p t0 N o N T T r 2 w 0 OOrOMOO'T m dr OD (3) w� V 0 � a O O 00 V 00 r N M (`7 0 T r N O E N E N N M r d d W W m O (f) O T LOC) cc) 00 OTOr— I— LOtOOo « O LO N LO 00 M N r M (O Lo UO T O M LO N O (O f` r N ON0ITN M0040W LL(/� Or OTT -;tNOrr p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m Co r O CM to T O co tO h m d 0 0 0 M N T O N N OOOM �MMO (DOr ( 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 7 y OMOiO t0 CO C) LO ca 94 000 O) N O LO O Me- O(nNO r O O r to 0 LO 0 IST 0 0 NM 0 0 W N PZ C4 Mr,O V) co ;767 r M 00 N N CD O F- O R O M T I r r- LO (p Cl) 2 H O M O r` T O (O r 9 T CN a NONNtl7�In'TON NLuE n O O O O M m 0 0 O000MV C)0 w OOOr Me -MN �OOr-:OaOoo O O O O T O O N O O t0 O41) Cl O V LL y 0 0 (V 0 0 0 0 0 C 2 0 0 0 O O O O O m O O M d OOGOOr-OOM (� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d D 7 O O O tO M O M OO(O(OO�r 00 ECD00TNTu�T W0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O M (O i O O H O O M O N O O t0 N O T (O M (p t0 N o N T T r 2 w 0 OOrOMOO'T m dr OD (3) w� V 0 � a O O 00 V 00 r N M (`7 0 T r N O E N E N N M r d d W W m Auburn School District Development Growth since 111/02 March, 2007 Projected 2007 and u n is Parcels Current Occupancy o Be Occupied Alicia Glenn 31 0 31 Anderson Acres 14 0 14 Backbone Ride 7 0 7 Beaver Meadows 60 0 60 Brandon Meadows 55 0 55 Brandon Place 78 0 78 Bridle Estates 18 0 18 Cam -West 99 0 99 Cambridge Pointe 261 0 26 Carrington Pointe 241 0 24 Dallit Ohaltwal Plat 8 0 8 Estes Park 31 0 31 Har reet Kang 8 0 8 Hazel Hei hts 22 0 22 Hazel View 20 0 20 Kendall Ride 106 0 106 Kent Impound Area 386 0 386 Kersey 3 Project 373 0 373 Lakeland East Phase 1 1301 0 130 Lakeland East Phase 2/3 340 0 340 Lawson Place 14 0 14 U I -e Fields 8 0 8 Megan's Meadows 9 0 9 Mountain View Estates 29 0 29 M ste Heights 6 0 6 New Hoe Lutheran Plat 8 0 8 Pacific View 34 0 34 Plemmons Development 8 0 8 Spencer Place 13 0 13 Stipps Plat 29 0 29 Vintage Place 25 0 25 Wiliow Place 18 0 18 Yates Plat 16 0 15 2 2053 10 2053 March 2007 Projected Students Middle HS Total 4 5 19 2 2 8 F 1 1 4 8 10 36 7 9 33 10 13 47 2 3 11 311 131 16 59 8 31 4 16 7 3 4 14 2 1 1 5 10 4 5 19 2 1 1 5 7 3 4 13 6 3 3 12 33 13 17 64 121 49 62 231 116 471 60V4, 41 16 21 106 43 55 4 2 2 2 1 1 3 1 1 9 4 5 2 1 1 2 1 1 5 11 4 5 20 2 1 1 5 4 2 2 8 9 4 5 17 8 3 4 15 6 2 3 11 5 2 3 10 6411 2601 330 1231 March 2007 ti J Q U- D D FE O Mtia0 O O �(DNd.-O�Of O O do 0 0 NCD0 OC) ctdD o aO0 +�� 0 000.-.-O� N a NO N M U ON(DO V'I� OOOMMf� et li c O 0000000000.-0 O O LO O LO O <- t f 7 •"• M 000000000000 v co y U (D f -M ON U')O I- O) o m 4) OO'T of V'M000'T O) M OONN O O O O �N� O O O �--•OO1, O O O O O � 3 .+ c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d 9 E CA C V CDOMNm00 O � N N to � � CO('M(o M U) Q) y y r O O O O O � O O O O O W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •C L M M d V CO (D N N O _ N N O H N O O N � O O I, O OIT N � C r co o c 3 T O (D "* CV � Cf) y 0 0 f, O N d P- O Q CL Q C E_ o .C4 0 E M �— M N N O� � M � CP O LD d 72CL co _ N c E d W 3UUt�i�dtn(°n= O O O O O O do 0 0 o CO Q N N O 3 H v O rMC)MNM v co y U (D f -M ON U')O I- O) o C C M � 3 U � v O H CO 000 (D 1l- Cn (D NMN (n N CD (A f— a) a) Lo OO (l d �-- •-- M C) e- N •C L ~ A �a N O (U t C o c 3 3o I -O y y Eo d P- O Q CL Q C E_ o o 0 Z~�c`o3 C a- c F- 72CL co _ N c E d d 3UUt�i�dtn(°n= v ao�� (acoC:r-CCC c(n m v da�a�a)a�ma)ma�� ami o co to to N m ca cv m N __