Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
3826
Ordinance No. 3826 (Amending or Repealing Ordinances) CFN=775-Capital Improvement Plan; 961 -Capital Facilities Plan Passed — 12/12/2006 Comprehensive Plan Amendments School Districts' Capital Facilities Plans ORDINANCE NO. 3Fa 6 AN ORDINANCE of the city council of the city of Kent, Washington, amending the city of Kent Comprehensive Plan to amend the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts (CPA -2006-3). RECITALS A. The Washington State Growth Management Act ("GMA") requires internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements and the plans from other jurisdictions. B. To assure that comprehensive plans remain relevant and up to date, the GMA allows amendments to the capital facilities element of comprehensive plans concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a city budget (RCW 36.70A.130(2)(iii)). C. The city of Kent has established procedures for amending the Comprehensive Plan in chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code, allowing amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the city budget and allowing the city council to hold the public hearing instead of the Land Use and Planning Board. D. The Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts have submitted proposed amendments to their Capital Facilities Plans to be included in an amendment of the city's Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. E. After providing appropriate public notice, the city council of the city of Kent considered the requested comprehensive plan amendment and conducted a public hearing on the same on November 21, 2006. 1 Comprehensive Plan Amendments School Districts' Capital Facilities Plans F. On October 3, 2006, the city provided the required sixty (60) day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 to the state of Washington of the city's proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan and the sixty (60) day notice period has lapsed. G. On December 12, 2006, the city council for the city of Kent approved the Capital Facilities Element amendment CPA -2006-3 to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached and incorporated by this reference (CPA -2006-3). NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OFTHE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE SECTION 1. - Amendment. The Capital Facilities Element of the city of Kent Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached and incorporated by this reference (CPA -2006-3). SECTION 2. - SeyerabllltV. If any one or more sections, sub -sections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION3. - Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after the date of passage as provided by law. COOKE, MAYOR 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendments School Districts' Capital Facilities Plans ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CI LERK APPROVED AS TO.FORM: X��tk EA [, V� TOM BRUBA <ER, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED: /_ day of December, 2006. APPROVED: � day of December, 2006. PUBLISHED: /& day of December, 2006. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. W,:24. passed by the city council of the city of Kent, Washington, and approved by the mayor of the city of Kent as hereon indicated. P \C I%Ordlnanc \UMPPlanAmend $NDOIDs Cs Capp FaaliaeePWa 20 dM a (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CI CLERK 3 Comprehensive Plan Amendments School Districts' Capital Facilities Plans 111111i FICIiIIIES Il� 2006 - 2007 - 2011 - 2012 SeNOOL 0131e19T NQ, 41 m Fnrnld Park Elementary Sue Emerald Parc Elementary School Emerald Park Elementary 1" Serving Unincorporated ping County Residents And Residents of the Cities of int, Covington, 2ludum, BlackDiamond, Maple Nafley, Renton, and Sea7ac, Washington April2006 Kent School 12033 SE 256' Street Kent, Washington 96030-6643 ` (253)373-7295 SIX - YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 - 2007 — 2011- 2012 "KEN SCHOOL DISTIICT BOARD of DIRECTORS Bill Boyce Sandra Collins Scott Floyd Lisa Holliday Mike Jensen ADMINISTRATION Barbara Grohe, Ph.D. — Superintendent Fred H. High — Assistant Superintendent for Business Services Mark Haddock, Ph.D. —Assistant Supenntendent for Learning & School Improvement Margaret A. Whitney — Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources Janis Bechtel — Executive Director, Kentlake & Kentwood Strand Meryl Rieger — Executive Director, Kent -Meridian & Kentridge Strand Donald Hall — Executive Director of Information Technology John Knutson — Executive Director of Finance Kent School District Six -Yew Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 Kent school Owlstrict SIX -YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 - 2007 - 2011- 2012 April 2006 For information on the Plan, please call the Finance & Planning Department at (253) 373-7295 Capital Facilities Plan Contributing Staff Gwenn Escher-Derdowski Forecast & Planning Administrator Fred Long, Supervisor of Facilities & Construction Karla Wilkerson & Lynell Mooney, Facilities Department Don Walkup, Supervisor of Transportation Department Kathy Foslord, Purchasing Department Cover Design by Debbi Smith Maps by Jana Tucker Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 dent school n�strict Srryea+Capita( gacilinisPlan TacfegContents Section I Executive Summary I I Six -Year Enrollment Projection & History III District Standard of Service I V Inventory, Capacity & Maps of Existing Schools V Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan V I Relocatable Classrooms VII Projected Classroom Capacity VIII Finance Plan, Cost Basis and Impact Fee Schedules I X Summary of Changes to Previous Plan X Appendixes Kent School DtsMct Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Page Number 2 4 8 17 18 23 30 31 Apnl 2006 I Executive Summary This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Kent School District (the "District") as the organization's facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, Maple Valley and Black Diamond This annual plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2006 for the 2005-2006 school year. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. The first ordinance implementing impact fees for the unincorporated areas was effective September 15, 1993. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee -implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Plan has also been submitted to cities of Maple Valley, Black Diamond, SeaTac, and Renton. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a "standard of service" in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs in the District The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Program capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Relocatables in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (continued) Kent Sdaol dstrid Six -Year Capital Faalfts Plan April 2008 Page 2 I Executive Summary (continued) The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District standard of service and the existing inventory, which Includes some relocatable classrooms The District's program capacity of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the reduction of class size to meet the requirements of Student Achievement Initiative 726. Relocatables provide additional transitional capacity until permanent facilities are completed. Kent School District is the fourth largest district in the state. Enrollment is reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) on Form P223. Enrollment on October 1 is considered to be the enrollment for the year. P223 Headcount for October 1, 2005 was 26,970. P223 FTE (Full Time Equivalent) enrollment was 25,809.38. (FTE reports Kindergarten at .5 and excludes Early Childhood Education [ECE] and college -only Running Start students.) The actual number of individual students per the October 2004, full head count was 27,573. (Full Headcount reports all students at 1.0 including Kindergarten, ECE and college -only Running Start students.) The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of transitional facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. Our plan is to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of relocatables. A financing plan is included in Section V I I I which demonstrates the Districts ability to implement this Plan. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated annually with changes in the fee schedules adjusted accordingly. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Apnl 2008 Page 3 I I Six -Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years. (See Table 2) The student generation factor, as defined on the next page, is the basis for the growth projections from new developments. King County births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system. (See Table 1) 8.41% of 21,778 King County live births in 2001 is forecast for 1,832 students (916 FTE .5) expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2006. Together with proportional growth from new construction, 8.41% of King County births is equivalent to the number of students projected to enter kindergarten in the district for the next six- year period (see raareg) Early Childhood Education students (sometimes identified as "Preschool Special Education [SE] or handicapped students") and non -disabled peer models are forecast and reported separately. Capacity is reserved to serve that program at seven elementary schools. Full day kindergarten programs are provided at most elementary schools with alternative funding for the second half of the day. The first grade population is traditionally 7 - 8% larger than the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District from private kindergartens. Cohort survival method uses historical enrollment data to forecast the number of students projected for the following year. Near term projections assume some growth from new developments to be offset by current local economic conditions. With notable exceptions, the expectation is that enrollment increases will occur District -wide in the long term District projections are based on historical growth patterns combined with continuing development of projects in the pipeline dependent on market/growth conditions. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools and monitor conditions to reflect adjustments in this assumption. The six-year enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions may be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The Kent School District serves seven permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, and Auburn and small portions of the cities of SeaTac, Renton & Maple Valley. The west Lake Sawyer area of Kent School District is in the city limits of Black Diamond. (Continued) Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 Page 4 I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection (Continued) STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last five years. The Student Factor has been updated to reflect the secondary grade level reconfiguration. Following these guidelines, the student generation factor for Kent School District is as follows, Single Family Elementary .444 Middle School .148 Senior High .252 Total .844 Multi -Family Elementary .293 Middle School .058 Senior High .094 Total .445 The student generation factor is based on a survey of 3,746 single family dwelling units and 1,283 multi -family dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy rates. Please refer to Appendix E on Pages 35-36 of the Capital Facilities Plan for details of the Student Generation Factor survey. The actual number of students in those residential developments was determined using the Districts Education Logistics (EDULOG) Transportation System. Kent School Dietrict Six -Year capital Facilities Plan Apnl 2006 Pape 5 m L rr-r1 1 1I w o, N nrn vr + w M mvi I 101 I I I�J N N N N N C4 C4 NN m i4I N co A l a 1n 0 1, M r Ut � I. ml o N j I I N fV N N N N N N N l N m gW In N f` 4n OJ r Q/ m I I N1 I N Y O I w r e: r IV C IV N iV N e r rl N m PI rn ifs 5tI I NI I m I— N m to w W r O In v 0 co NI m 1 I NI I N m l r r N N fV N N N N N r '7I LO N p u z 4 E A_ I_ In r- 0 0 0 r 0 N a v to all v m l I NI I N m I r N N N N N N N N N r rI N m b N M m g s N00I ... .. ...... ... .. r �I N - 5 W ^ I I CAI I �C JD w 1� r N t.l r t7 m r r gt If1 S O 4 N PO f` e2I to o e 1 ILII m IN $a$a$ cm m ml c f� € v �o �IIwII� ODIC �38F Via$ �ns�I � x W � �j W v I N r W O ck W 01 eq OI at ee o �I m g cS =LL slnlw .o N m I Irl I N N YJ m ch l N Itj O 1 n 14 N 0 10 m N 0 0 (, ml Y, W m I I rI I `� r I r r r r r r r r r �- 1101 1 M_ aE I_ h co N m N r in 0 0 m ,. oll LL N N r r r r r r r I N 11J $ W N m l I r'I l C e .w I A c of Fi 3. O Sd SRI n1 �, - I 1 R B _ m^ ;w I ;i 4:k 0ct) 0 0 A A co m it a Nl r s o V— t - v s m � I T W 1` IactN V/ V IN lV {p p T m 1� I I w Is. N en a In m P. ao rn� w o 1 1 I I Y Y s V V V V V m L KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX -YEAR F.T.E. ENROLLMENT PROJECTION ACTUAL P R O J E C T 1 O N Octoberl 2005 2006 1 2007 1 2008 2009 2010 2011 568 443 226 100 Kindergarten / Birth % 2 King County Live Births' 22,487 21,778 21,863 22,431 22,874 23,100 23,200 ' Increase( Decrease 480 -709 85 568 443 226 100 Kindergarten / Birth % 2 8 41 % 8 41 % 860% 8.60% 859% 860% 859% 2" Kindergarten FTE @ 5 943 916 940 964 983 993 997 Grade 1 1,938 2,003 1,961 2,012 2,063 2,103 2,124 Grade 2 1,981 1,975 2,056 2,013 2,065 2,117 2,157 Grade 3 1,962 2,019 2,028 2,110 2,066 2,119 2,172 Grade 4 2,024 1,976 2,048 2,057 2,139 2,095 2,148 Grade 5 2,090 2,066 2,033 2,106 2,115 2,198 2,154 Grade 6 2,164 2,162 2,151 2,117 2,192 2,201 2,287 Grade 7 2,200 2,226 2,250 2,238 2,203 2,281 2,290 Grade 8 2,293 2,249 2,300 2,325 2,312 2,276 2,356 Grade 9 2,767 2,857 2,827 2,887 2,917 2,901 2,856 Grade 10 2,173 2,173 2,268 2,240 2,286 2,310 2,297 Grade 11 1,799 1,841 1,866 1,942 1,917 1,956 1,977 Grade 12 1,475 1,391 1,448 1,463 1,521 1,502 1,532 Total FTE Enrollment 25,809 25,854 26,176 26,474 26,779 27,052 27,347 N . 2/J/4 Yearly Increase 39 45 322 298 305 273 295 Yearly Increase % 0.15% 0.17% 125% 1.14% 1.15% 102% 109% Cumulative Increase 39 84 406 704 1,009 1,282 1,577 Full Time Equivalent FTE 25,809 1 25,854 1 26,176 126,474 1 26,779 1 27,052 27 347 ' Kindergarten projection based on King County actual Irve birth percentage and proportional growth from new construction 2 Kindergarten FTE enrollment projection at 5 is calculated by using the Distrxe's percentage of King County Irve births 5 years earlier compared to actual kindergarten enrollment in the previous year (Excludes ECE - Early Childhood Education) ' Kindergarten projection is at 5 FTE although most schools provide Full Day Kindergarten with alternative funding 4 Oct 2005 P223 FTE is 25,809 & Headcount is 26,970 Full student count with ECE Preschool & Running Start = 27,573 G R O W T H P R O J E C T I O N S - Adjustments for current economic factors For facilities planning purposes, this six-year enrollment projectlon anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction In the district Kent School Distncl Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 April 2006 Page 7 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of the District's facilities, King County Code 21A.06 refers to a "standard of service" that each school district must establish In order to ascertain Its overall capacity. The standard of service Identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the District which would, in the District's judgment, best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as "Impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower class size at those facilities. Relocatables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (See Appendix A, e & c) The standard of service defined herein may continue to change in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service adjustments to meet the requirements of Student Achievement Initiative 728. This process will affect various aspects of the District's "standard of service" and future changes will be reflected In future capital facilities plans. Because the funding for Initiative 728 is incremental, Implementation of the Initiative is also incremental and may result in annual changes to school capacity. Current ;Ztandards of Service for Elementary Students Class size for grades K - 3 should not exceed an average of 22 students. Class size for grade 4 should not exceed an average of 23 students. Class size for grades 5 - 6 should not exceed an average of 29 students. Program capacity for regular education elementary classrooms is calculated at an average of 24 students per classroom because of fluctuations between primary and intermediate grade levels (i.e. thirdtfourth or fourth/fifth grade split classes, etc ). Most elementary schools provide full day kindergarten programs (FDK or KAI — Full Day Kindergarten or Kindergarten Academic Intervention) with the second half of the day funded by grants or tuition. Students have scheduled time in a computer lab. Students may also be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program (oont(nued) Kent School District Sic -Year Capital Facclrtbs Plan April 2W6 Page 8 I I Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs such as those designated as follows: English Language Learners (E L L) Self-contained Special Education Support Center Programs (SC) Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Early Childhood Education (ECE) (34 yr. old students with disabilities) School Adjustment (SA) Program for severely behavior -disordered students Speech & Language Therapy & Programs for Hearing Impaired students Adaptive Support Center for Mild, Moderate & Severe Disabilities (ASC -DD) Occupational & Physical Therapy Programs (OT/PT) Developmental Kindergarten (Magnet K Programs) Kindergarten Academic Intervention Program (KAI-Full Day Kindergarten) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) District Remediation Programs Education for Highly Capable Students (formerly "Gifted" Program) Some of the above special programs require specialized classroom space, as well as music and physical education classrooms, computer labs, etc; thus, the permanent capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in these special programs and "pull-out" space must be allocated to serve these programs. Some newer buildings have been constructed to accommodate most of these programs; some older buildings have been modified, and in some circumstances, these modifications reduce the classroom capacity of the buildings. When programs change, program capacity fluctuates and is updated annually to reflect the change in program and capacity. Current Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings. Reductions have been made in 7th and 10th grade English classes for Initiative 728. These standards are subject to change pending annual updates based on staff and public review for changes funded by Student Achievement Initiative 728. Class size for grades 7 - 9 should not exceed an average of 29 students Class size for 7t" & 10th grade English Gass should not exceed an average of 25 students. Class size for grades 10 - 12 should not exceed an average of 31 students. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (contd ) Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 Pape 9 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) Identified students will also be provided other education opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows: Computer, Mufti -media & Technology Labs and Programs English Language Learners (E L L) Science Programs & Labs — Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Oceanography, Astronomy, Meteorology, Marine Biology, General Science, etc Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Basic Skills Programs Preschool and Daycare Programs Music Programs — Band, Orchestra, Chorus, Jazz Band, etc Art Programs — Painting, Design, Drawing, Ceramics, Pottery, Photography, etc. Theater Arts — Drama, Stage Tech, etc. Joumalism and Yearbook Classes Highly Capable (Honors or Gifted) and Advanced Placement Programs International Baccalaureate Program Traffic Safety Education JROTC - Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps Variety of Career & Technical Education Programs (CTE -Vocational Education) Family & Consumer Science — Cooking, Sewing, Child Development, etc. Health Sciences, Sports Medicine, etc Business Education — Keyboarding, Accounting, Business Law, DECA, Sales & Marketing, etc. Material Sciences — Woods and Cabinet Making, Metals, Welding, Electronics, Auto Shop, Manufacturing Technology, Machine Shop, CAD, (Computer-aided Design) Drafting & Drawing, etc. Culinary Arts, Graphic & Commercial Arts, Engineering, etc. Many of these programs and others require specialized classroom space which can reduce the permanent capacity of the school buildings. In addition, an alternative home school assistance, choice and transition program is provided for students in grades 1 - 12 at Kent Mountain View Academy. Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 85% for secondary schools. Program capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level with adjustments for pull-out programs served in relocatables. In the future, the District will continue close analysis of actual utilization. Kent School District Sec -Year Capital Facildies Plan April 2006 Page 10 t i I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 27,824 students and transitional (relocatable) capacity to house 1,345. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section I 11. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity. (See Table 3 on Page 12) The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs, additional classrooms and new schools. Program capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes. It has also been updated to estimate new capacity for budding additions at the high schools. It includes preliminary capacity for Mill Creek Middle School which re -opened in the fall of 2005. Program capacity also reflects adjustments for the Student Achievement Initiative 728 reduction in class size. The class size reduction received voter approval in the Educational Programs and Operations Levy as well as through funding for Student Achievement Initiative 728. The District will conduct annual public review and update class size recommendations in accordance with the requirements and incremental funding of Student Achievement Initiative 728. Kent Mountain View Academy (formerly Kent Learning Center and Grandview Elementary) serves grades 1 through 12 with transition, choice and home school assistance programs. It is located in the former Grandview School in the western part of the District in the city of SeaTac. This school was originally designed as an elementary school and is included in the elementary capacity for this Plan. Calculation of Elementary, Junior High and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B and C. A map of existing schools is included on Page 13. Kent School District Six -Yew Capital Facilities Plan Apni 2006 Page 11 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS 2005-2006 Year SCHOOL Opened I ABR ADDRESS Program Ca ac ' Carriage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235 - 140th Avenue SE. Renton 98058 490 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042 428 Covington Elementary 1961 CO 17070 SE Wax Road. Covington 98042 478 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225 -180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 480 Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 USE 248th Street, Kent 98031 480 East HAI Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 490 Emerald Park 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 504 Fauwood Elementary 1969 FW 16600 -148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 420_____ Glenndge Elementary 1996 GR 19405 - 120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 _ 456 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700 -191st Place SE, Kent 98042 490 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641 -144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 480 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915 _186th Avenue SE, Covington 9804_2 428 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700 - 64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 466 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19080 -142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 562 Martin Sonun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98031 468 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710-1_08th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 466 Mendian Elementary 1939 ME 25621 -140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 538 Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98031 492 Neely -O'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 442 Panther Lake Elementary 1938 PL 21)831_ -_108th Avenue SE, Kent 9803_1 384 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO _ 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 498 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825 - 118th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 540 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030 -182nd Place SE, Renton 98058 504 Sawyer Woods Elementary _ 19_94 SW 31135 - 228th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 504 Scenic HAI Elementary 1960 SH _ 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98031 464 Soos Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 418 Spnngbrook Elementary 1969 SB 20035 -100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 440 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300 - 132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 504 Elementary TOTAL 13,314 Cedar Heights Middle School 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 Strost, Covington 98042 929 Mattson Middle School 1981 MA 18400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042 775 Meeker Middle School _ 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 841___ Meridian Middle School 1958 MJ 23480 -120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 _ _ 910 MAI Creek MS (former Kent Jr HI) 2 200511952 MC 620 Nord Central Avenue, Kent 98032 768 Northwood Middle School 1996 NW 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 935 Sequoia Middle School 19W SJ 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98031 832 Middle School TOTAL 5,990 Kent -Meridian Senior High School 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98031 1,803 Kenflake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042 1,812 Kentridge Senior High School 1968 KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 2,302 Kentwood Senor High School 1981 KW 25800 - 164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 2,187 Senior High TOTAL 8,104 Kent Mountain View Academy 3 1985 LC 22420 Military Road, Des Moines 98198 416 DISTRICT TOTAL 27 624 ' U%arges to CaPacrtY reflect program changes and new building additions at high schools Kant Junior High was dosed for 2004-05 for remodel and re -purpose It re -opened in 2005 as Mill Creek Middle School Kent Mountain View Academy serves grades 1-12 The school was formerly known as Kent Leaning Center 8 Grandview Elementary Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 April 2006 Page 12 i � - e� V7 | 13 -E- n , n ■ � � � � ®� � « _ 4 i y � 2; | V A U 1 |!| n V # K q _ | # | \|-/ . 7 -~`| |\ / | l 2®` ► w � Q |k . #. 61 &| Af|! a R | § I2 |- , '$ ®!I!%:#g | /p°� g_ mk |%r 9 \fSa I=«A , u iaK h % ^ -W +1 e- 1 1 I��H � .. • J x ■ .qkl ------------- Kent SUNW Ohdrict 3ix- --._O_3ix- _.cPIM Faci e_Plan Ami•20M V� - V Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring of 2006, the following projects are completed or in the planning phase in the District: • Additions to three high schools have added capacity for students from new development and a Grade students moving to the high schools Voters recently approved funding for further classroom capacity to be added at Kentlake and Kent -Meridian High Schools. • Reconfiguration to 7" and 8 h grades provides additional capacity at middle schools The Board has approved renovation and re -configuration of Sequoia Middle School to serve as an Altemative High School in 2007-08 • Kent Junior High was temporarily closed for one year in 2004-05 for re -purpose and remodel In 2005, the school was renamed and opened in September 2005 as Mill Creek Middle School (# 7a) with a new 7'" Grade Technology Academy program The voters have recently approved funding for Phase II of the renovation of Mill Creek MS • In February 2006, voters approved construction funding for replacement of Panther Lake Elementary School and a future new Elementary School to accommodate new growth. • Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary and high school level Future facility and site needs are reflected in this Plan • Sites for potential future schools and facilities are listed in Table 4 and shown on the site map on page 16 • Some funding is secured for purchase of additional portables and some funding may be provided by impact fees as needed Sites are based on need for additional capacity County and city planners and decision -makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety, as well as pull- outs and turn-arounds for school buses. Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future. (see Tawe 4) Voter approved bond issues for $105AM in 1990 and $130M in 1994 included funding for the purchase of eleven sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan Some funding is secured for purchase of additional sites but some may be funded with impact fees as needed Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. 2006 voter approval of $1061M bond issue for capital improvement included the construction funding for a new elementary school, replacement of Panther Lake Elementary, and classroom additions to high schools. Some impact fees will also be applied to those projects Student Achievement Initiative 728 funds are being utilized to reduce class size and provide extended learning opportunities Based on community input at public hearings, the Board will continue annual review of standard of service and those decisions will be reflected in the each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. Kent School Dntnct Sa-Year Capml Faaides Plan Apnl 2006 Page 14 t son KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity ELEMENTARY_ -J (Numbers assigned to future schools may not correlate with number o/ existing schools ) Replacement for Panther Lake Elementary (F) To be rebuilt on current ads Replacement Planning 2009 500 25% Elementary # 31 (Funded) To be determined 2 New Planning 2010 500 1009E Elementary Site (Unfunded)1 To be determined 2 Site Planning 2007 500 1009E MIDDLE SCHOOL Sequoia Middle School Renovation & Reconfiguration Renovation Planning 2007 432 to Alternative High School SENIOR HIGH Prateded Compleuon Date Projected Program Capacity %tor new Growth SCHOOL /FACILITY /SITE LOCATION Type Status Kentridge ELEMENTARY_ -J (Numbers assigned to future schools may not correlate with number o/ existing schools ) Replacement for Panther Lake Elementary (F) To be rebuilt on current ads Replacement Planning 2009 500 25% Elementary # 31 (Funded) To be determined 2 New Planning 2010 500 1009E Elementary Site (Unfunded)1 To be determined 2 Site Planning 2007 500 1009E MIDDLE SCHOOL Sequoia Middle School Renovation & Reconfiguration Renovation Planning 2007 432 to Alternative High School SENIOR HIGH Utilized Classroom additions at three High Schools Kent-Mendlan for growth & reconfiguration (Funded) Kentridge Utilized Kentwood 1,000 Sequoia Middle Scholl Alternative High School (Funded) 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent Classroom additions at two high schools (F) Kentlake & Kent -Meridian TEMPORARY FACILITIES Rebcatables For placement as needed SUPPORT FACILITIES Bus Facility (Unfunded)' Near Kent -Meridian High School OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Additions Utilized 2004-06 386 75% Additions Utilized 2004-06 1,000 75% Additions Utilized 2004-06 896 75% Renovation Planning 2007-08 500 75% Additions Planning 2007/2008 -200 75% 2 Shady Lake area (Sowers, etc ) 17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98058 Additional Capadry King County New Planning 2006+ 24.31..b 100% New Planning TBD 2 N / A Land Use T Jurisdiction 4 Covington area North (Near Mattson MS) SE 251 & 164 SE, Covington 98042 Elementary City of Covington 7 Covington area South (Scarsella) SE 290 & 156 SE, Kent 98042 Elementary King County 5 Covington area West (Halleson-Wikstrom) 15435 SE 256 StreeL Covington 96042 TBD 2 City of Covington 3 Ham Lake area (Pollard) 16820 SE 240, Kent 98042 Elementary King County 8 SE of Lake Morton area (West property) SE 332 & 204 SE, Kent 98042 Secondary King County 2 Shady Lake area (Sowers, etc ) 17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98058 Elementary King County 1 So King Co. Activity Center (Nike she) SE 167 & 170 SE, Renton 98058 TBD 2 King County 12 South Central site (Plemmons-Yeh-Wms) SE 286th Street & 124th Ave SE, Kent TBD 2 King County Notes: ' Unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future 2 TBD - To be determined - Some Was are acquired but placement, timing and/or contipuration have not been determined, 3 Numbers correspond to edge on Map on Page 16. Other site Locations are parcels identified in Table 7 on Page 26 Kent School District Stix -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 April 2006 Page 15 r-= Z A SEsI CT \ I •W I 1 ��• / �� / Is:s o�l �\ 1 / J• AI l tJ 11 V$ d VI • I Sll v I i I_a° N I oyF0, sal I.ul /39 �yFr11, 1 ml IW I �t L A1C �_C� I fV� 9=1 /� Z� I _spa_ 3eaAV u �I 1 1 91 LPA N $ -Z X ., El I-A/ cII I Ruftg LAW "-j 1 AGtPA 40M �I AO-46H f 1 tl �? x°\ 4-1 TH E Kant School DistAet Six-Yw Capital Padlities Plan V I Relocatable Classrooms For the purpose of clarification, the term "portables" and the more descriptively accurate term, "relocatables" are used Interchangeably in this Plan. The Plan also references use of portables or relocatables as Interim or transitional capacity/facilities. Currently, the District utilizes 132 total relocatables to house students in excess of permanent capacity, for program purposes at school locations, and six for other purposes. (see Appendices n a c o) Based on enrollment projections, program capacity and funded permanent facilities, the District anticipates the need to purchase some additional relocatables during the next six-year period. The continually escalating cost of moving relocatables will increasingly limit the choice between building new relocatables on site and relocating older ones. During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District's relocatables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the relocatables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these relocatables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables, or relocatables, may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Relocatables currently in use will be evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced. Quality concerns will be among those addressed by the next Community Facilities Planning Committee for review of capital facilities needs for the next bond issue. The Plan projects that the District will use relocatables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of relocatables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between relocatables, emerging technologies and educational restructuring will continue to be be examined. Kent Scfrool District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 Page 17 VII Projected Six -Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section I V, the program capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size fluctuations in Grades K - 4. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart In Table 3 on Page 12, the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts. (See Tables 5 B 5 A -B -C on pages 19 - 22) Enrollment is reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is recognized as the "enrollment count date" for the year. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) student enrollment for October 1, 2005 was 25,809.38 which represents an increase of 39 FTE over the previous October. Kindergarten students are counted at .5 and P223 FTE excludes Early Childhood Education students (ECE - preschool special education) and College -only Running Start students. (See Tables 5 & 5A -B -C on pages 19 - 22) On October 1, there were 586 students in 11th and 12"' grade participating in the Running Start program at 9 different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. 315 of these students attended classes only at the college ("college -only") and are thus excluded from the FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District continues to be the fourth largest district in the state of Washington. P223 Headcount for October 1, 2005 was 26,970 with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECE and college -only Running Start students. A full headcount of all students enrolled on October 1, 2005 totals 27,573 which includes ECE and college -only Running Start students. This reflects an increase of 233 actual students compared to October 1, 2004. Based on the enrollment forecasts, current inventory and capacity, current standard of service, relocatable capacity, and future planned additional classroom space, the District anticipates having sufficient capacity to house students over the next six years. (see Table 5 and Tables 5 A -B -C on Pages 19 - 22) This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There may be significant need for additional portables and/or new schools to accommodate growth within the District and class size reduction mandated under Student Achievement Initiative 728 Some schools, by design, may be opened with relocatables on site. Boundary changes, limited movement of relocatables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and underutilization of facilities in different parts of the District. Kent Sdxxil Dlstrid Six -Year Cootal FacAtles Plan April 2006 Page 18 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT Permanent Program Capacity' 1 24,767 Chan es to Permanent CapacAty' Classrooms added at 3 high schools (F) Kent-Mendian - Kentndge - Kentwood Estimated Program Capacity 2,282 27,824 27,824 27,278 27,328 27,828 28,328 Classroom additions at Kentlake 6 Kent -Meridian (F) 150 50 4 Sequoia Middle School will be renovated and reconfigured as Alternative High School In 2007-05 Change to Middle School Capacity -832 High School Program Capacity added 500 5 Mill Creek Middle School - Kent Junior High re -opened as Mill Creek Mkkfb School 8 Technology Academy We in Fall 2005 Estimated Program Capacity 775 Replacement with increased capacity for Panther Lake Elementary (Funded) Elementary#31 (Funded) 500 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 27,824 27,824 27,278 27,328 27,828 28,328 28,328 Interim Relocatable Capacl Elementary Relocalable Capacity Required 0 0 0 24 0 0 2011-2oi2 SCHOOL YEAR 0 20052oos Zooszoo7 2007 -zoos 2ooezoo9 1 2009-2010 1 2010zo>> Senior High Ramcarable Capacity Required 124 Actual P R O J E C T E D Permanent Program Capacity' 1 24,767 Chan es to Permanent CapacAty' Classrooms added at 3 high schools (F) Kent-Mendian - Kentndge - Kentwood Estimated Program Capacity 2,282 27,824 27,824 27,278 27,328 27,828 28,328 Classroom additions at Kentlake 6 Kent -Meridian (F) 150 50 4 Sequoia Middle School will be renovated and reconfigured as Alternative High School In 2007-05 Change to Middle School Capacity -832 High School Program Capacity added 500 5 Mill Creek Middle School - Kent Junior High re -opened as Mill Creek Mkkfb School 8 Technology Academy We in Fall 2005 Estimated Program Capacity 775 Replacement with increased capacity for Panther Lake Elementary (Funded) Elementary#31 (Funded) 500 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 27,824 27,824 27,278 27,328 27,828 28,328 28,328 Interim Relocatable Capacl Elementary Relocalable Capacity Required 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 Mkkee School Reloralehle Capacity Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Senior High Ramcarable Capacity Required 124 188 0 0 0 0 0 Toted Relocatable Capacity Required' a e 124 186 0 24 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 27,948 1 28.0v 1 27,278 1 27,352 1 27,828 1 28,328 28 328 roTAL FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 2 25,809 25,854 26,176 26,474 26,779 27,052 27,347 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 2,139 2,156 1,102 878 1,049 1,276 981 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 FTE = Full Time Equivalent Enrollment (t a 12 day Kindergarten student - 5). In Fall 2004, 9th grade moved to the high schools which provided increased capacity at Middle School level 4 Sequoia Middle School will be renovated and reconfigured as an Alternative High School In 2007-08. 5 Oil Creek Middle School re -opened in Fall 2005 with a Technology Academy serving 7th grade students from other service areas 5 2005-20()6 total classroom relocatable capacity is 1,345 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 April 2006 Page 19 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH - Grades 9 -12 Senior High Permanent Capacity' 1 5,822 8,104 8,104 8,754 8,804 8,804 8,804 Changes to High School Capacity SCHOOL YEAR 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-200e 1 20011-2008 1 2009-2010 1 2010-2011 1 2011-2012 Actual P R O J E C T E D Kent-Mendian - Kentridge - Kentwood Senior High Permanent Capacity' 1 5,822 8,104 8,104 8,754 8,804 8,804 8,804 Changes to High School Capacity Classrooms added at three high schools (Funded) Kent-Mendian - Kentridge - Kentwood Estimated program rapacity 2,282 4 Alternative High School added through reconfiguration of Sequoia Middle School for 2007-08 (F) Estimated program capacity 500 Classroom additions at Kentlake High School (F) 150 Classroom additions at Kent Meridian High School (F) 50 Subtotal 8,104 8,104 8,754 8,804 8,804 8,804 8,804 Relocatable Capacity Required ' 124 186 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 8,228 8,290 8.754 8.804 8.804 8.804 8.804 FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 2 I 8.214 8 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 14 28 345 272 163 135 14 Number of Relocatables Required 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 Some Relocalables used for classroom and program purposes ' Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity `and updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 FTE — —Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment, excluding College -only Running Start students 3 Grade level reconfiguration - All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004 Sequoia Middle School will be renovated and reconfigured as an Altemative High School in 2007-08. Kent school District six -Year capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A April 2006 Page 20 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY MIDDLE SCHOOL - Grades 7 - 8 Middle School Permanent Capacity ' 5,215 5,990 5,990 5,158 5,158 5,158 5,158 ihanges to Middle School Capacity Moll Creek Middle School - Kent Junior High reopened as Mill Creek Middle School #7a in Fall 2005 Program capacity added 775 5 Sequoia Middle School will be reconfigured as an Alternative High School In 2007-08 Program capacity offline - moved to high ectwol $32 Subtotal 5,990 5,990 5,158 5,158 5,158 51158 5,158 Relocatable Capacity Required 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL YEAR 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 I 200a-2009 I 2009-2010 1 2010-2011 2011-2012 Actual P R O J E C T E D Middle School Permanent Capacity ' 5,215 5,990 5,990 5,158 5,158 5,158 5,158 ihanges to Middle School Capacity Moll Creek Middle School - Kent Junior High reopened as Mill Creek Middle School #7a in Fall 2005 Program capacity added 775 5 Sequoia Middle School will be reconfigured as an Alternative High School In 2007-08 Program capacity offline - moved to high ectwol $32 Subtotal 5,990 5,990 5,158 5,158 5,158 51158 5,158 Relocatable Capacity Required 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY ' a 5,990 5,990 5,158 5,158 5,158 5,158 5.158 CAPACITY I 1 1,515 808 595 No Classroom Relocatables required at this time Some Retocatables used for classroom and program purposes ' Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment / Projection 3 Grade level reconfiguration - All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fail 2004. Mill Creek Middle School 8 Technology Academy -Kent Junior High was renovated and re -opened In Fall 2005 with a Technology Academy serving 7th grade students from all service areas. s Sequoia Middle School will be renovated and reconfigured as an Altemative High School In 2007-08 and middle school boundaries will be reconfigured for six middle schools district -wide. Kent School District Soo -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 8 April 2008 Pape 21 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY - Grades K - 6 Elements Permanent Capacity ' 13,314 13,730 13,730 13,366 13,366 13,866 14,366 Kent Mountain View Academy 2 416 Changes to Elementary Capacity Replacement with increased capacity for Panther Lake Elementary (Funded)' -364 500 Elementary # 31 (Funded) S 500 Subtotal 13,730 13,730 13,366 13,366 13,866 14,366 14,366 SCHOOL YEAR 2005-2006 2006.2007 1 2007-2008 2008-2006 1 2009-2010 1 2010-2011 1 2011-2012 Actual P R O J E C T E D Elements Permanent Capacity ' 13,314 13,730 13,730 13,366 13,366 13,866 14,366 Kent Mountain View Academy 2 416 Changes to Elementary Capacity Replacement with increased capacity for Panther Lake Elementary (Funded)' -364 500 Elementary # 31 (Funded) S 500 Subtotal 13,730 13,730 13,366 13,366 13,866 14,366 14,366 Relocatable Capacity Required' 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 2 1 13,730 13,730 13,366 13,390 13,866 14,366 1 [__FTE 3 I. 13,102 13,117 13,217 13,379 13,623 13,826 14.039 Number of Relocatables Required 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 One Classroom Relocatable required in 2008-09 Some Relocatables used for classroom and program purposes I Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and Is updated periodically to reflect program charges. 2 Kent Mountain View Academy Is a special program at the former Grandview School serving students in Grades 1 -12. The school building (formedy Kent Learning Center & Grandview Elem ) was designed as an elementary school 3 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or Projection (Kindergarten a .5 & excluding ECE) Kindergarten projection is at 5 FTE although rnost schools provide Full Day Kindergarten with alternative funding Panther Lake Elementary will Gose for two years and be rebuilt on the existing site with increased capacity. 5 Site selection for Elementary #31 is pending review of location and capacity needs. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 (, AprN 2006 Page 22 VIII Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District pians to finance improvements for the years 2006 - 2007 through 2011 - 2012. The financing components Include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on voter approval of future bond Issues, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. Kent Elementary #27a, which opened in January 1999 as a replacement for the original Kent Elementary School, was the last elementary school for which the District received state matching funds under the current state funding formula. Millennium Elementary #30 which opened In the fall of 2000 was the last elementary school constructed in the District. Voters approved a $69.5 million bond issue for Capital Construction and Improvements in February 2002. This partially funded building additions at three high schools which coincided with moving 9th grade students to the senior high in September 2004. The District received state matching funds and has utilized impact fees for the senior high school additions. In February 2006, voters approved a $106 million bond issue for replacement of Panther Lake Elementary School with increased capacity to be rebuilt on its current site, construction of a new elementary school to accommodate growth, Phase II renovation for Mill Creek Middle School, and renovation of Sequoia Middle School to be reconfigured as an Alternative High School in 2007-08. Construction funding approval will also provide some additional classrooms to be constructed at the high school level. Some impact fees will be utilized for all new construction. Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary and high school level and unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future. Some funding is secured for additional portables and some will be funded from impact fees. For the Six -Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Facilities Department. Please see pages 25-26 for a summary of the cost basis. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Fadides Plan Apnl 2006 Page 23 H_ &! |all I ||§ g m | 11 | 1.!n g 9 | 1 | m || .1| s a s s§ R | a■ | g 119 2 1 m 2 z s A 1 e | I q | I| 52 52 sa■ s 2 9 | d | | |�|! & m m § m ■ e i §| | � |tet! ® � ~ _ - " " | ■| | | |d| ■a | « | �2 | �� | i a ■ | ■w | |m� & §a | a a £ ! ■� in | |!! ■ .■ | d k!|� �@ | |m| § /■ | SZ !A| e ■ | ! ® " |(b ; ! | ■ ( !Q � r Sa | a ! ■ « � | �9 & as I a 1 2 f a 1 t Ig 2 2 ■a | m ¥ eAI 1 IA 1 a k e! 1 m f!« 6; I E� | I Ba»■«ia I �a� s 8a | R a ,:■ ■|a I IM ! ; ■! | N OR § ! 1 ! ! , ■ ! f « a I # t i&ofI LL, 1 I a § IQI: |(| | ! A § �a ■1k ! la[�41 � ! « I |§I a | | | | I ! a ■ ; ■ I « f U�� �I a a ! 2 ! I «I a |moi zl al - ■ ! § ! J I m I «4 ! [Iq�b a a a a ■Im e||I | Ia@f;:l! % | Viii Finance Plan - Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last elementary school, with inflation factor, and projected cost of the next elementary school. Elementary School Cost Projected Cost Millennium Elements (#30 -open 2000 $12,182,768 Current cost of Elementary #31 $15,550,000 Projected cost of Elementary #31 in 2010 $16,650,000 $18,000,000 Construction cost of the additions to high schools: Senior High School Additions Projected Cost Total Addition to Kent -Meridian $11,300,000 Addition to Kentlake $6,000,000 Addition to Kentrid a $16,650,000 Addition to Kentwood $14,850,000 Construction cost of additions to 4 High Schools $48,800,000 Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 on page 26 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. District Adjustment for 2006 The impact fee calculations on pages 28 and 29 include a "District Adjustment" which is equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas drive out for this year and adjusted for increase in the Consumer Price Index. The reasons for this adjustment include: 1) the district's long-term commitment to keep impact fee increases as minimal as possible, and 2) our community's overwhelming support of Initiative 695. Kent Schod District Six -Year Capfal Faalifies Plan Apnl 2006 Page 25 .2 I �I I WI I 'I I yl I W) I I I N 1n IN OI II1 a /V m a� CO M r Co N T I< I I GGoo I R I co co v co m ami cm N Goo v N r C I~ 1 I I 1 52 �S %Q"I�q nIN�I� I NI I 1001 <� o r �l � m� 0l Ir m LO m I� �I I . I I- "l .. I" �1 Ln� I°la ���1� �g��1� I CD 1 r 1 €I E 5 Y g m 1 21 N W a .a W NW W � r W y 2 c N W W w N W N W (0 S V u I I S a aa_o a C o ' $ o o 2 I - N s! 44 C IV d � 8 N m N b, 3i W � W 2I I ml15 ra �p m r_ c, I n is l I m 8 m I I I iA d a r 8 � L+ 6 6 I �I CLI g, A €' 7 GG FA UI X C. IF oI a� N O N � m aD W I I Of n tl I X ! g KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors - Single Family Elementary (Grades K - 6) 0 444 Middle School (Grades 7 - 8) 0 148 Senior High (Grades 9 - 12) 0 252 Total 0 844 Projected Student Capacity Elementary 500 Middle School 1,065 Senior High 1,000 Required Site Acreage per Facility Elementary (required) 11 Middle School (required) 21 Senior High (required) 32 New Facility Construction Cost Elementary' $18,000,000 Middle School $0 Senior High ' $48,800,000 - See cost basis on Pg 25 Temporary Facility Square Footage Elementary 71,652 Middle School 27,000 Senior High 20,272 Total 4% 118,924 Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary 1,475,936 Middle School 651,273 Senior High 1,007,522 Total 96% 3,134,731 Total Facilities Square Footage Elementary 1,547,588 Middle School 678,273 Senior High 1,027,794 Total 3,253,655 Developer Provided Sites I Facilities Value 0 Dwelling Units 0 Student Generation Factors - Multi -Family Elementary 0 293 Middle School 0 058 Senior High 0 094 Total 0 445 OSPI - Square Footage per Student Elementary 90 Middle School 117 Senior High 130 Special Education 144 Average Site Cost i Acre Elementary $108,091 Middle School $52,563 Senior High $93,955 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost Elementary @ 24 $97,000 Middle School @ 29 $0 Senior High @ 31 $97,000 State Match Credit Current State Match Percentage 5594% Area Cost Allowance - Cost/Sq. Ft. Current Area Cost Allowance $15422 District Average Assessed Value Single Family Residence $263,362 District Average Assessed Value Mulb-Family Residence $82,971 Capital Levy Tax Ratel1111,000 Current / $1,000 Tax Rate $174 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Current Bond Interest Rate 439% Kent School District Six -Year capital Facifbw Plan Apn12006 Page 27 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula. ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage ( Average Site Cost/Acre I Fatality Capacity I Student Factor $20,51804 Al (Elementary) 11 $108,091 500 0444 $1,055.83 A 2 (Middle School) 21 SO 1,065 0 148 $0 A 3 (Senior High) 32 $0 1,000 0252 $0 0 844 A—> $1,05583 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula ((Facility Cost / Facility a ) x Student Factor) x (Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capcity S4dent Factor F Repo 81 (Elementary) $18,000,000 500 0.444 096 $15,34464 B 2 (Middle School) $0 . 1,065 0.148 0.96 $0 8 3 (Senior High) $48,800,000 2,282 am 096 $5,17340 0.644 B —> $20,51804 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence Formula. ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor)x (TemRaraU I Total square Footage Ratio Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor F RaW C 1 (Elementary) $97,000 24 0 444 0.04 $7178 C 2 (Muddle School) $0 29 0148 0.04 $0 C 3 (Senior High) $97,000 31 Q g 004 $3154 0 844 C —> $10332 State Match Credit per Single Family Residence Formula' Area Cost Allowance x SPI uare Feet per student x District Match% x Student Factor Area Cwt Alamance SPI Sq Ft I Student I Distinct Maleh % I Student Fatxo D 1 (Elementary) $154.22 90 05594 0 444 $3,44738 D 2 (Middle School) $154.22 117 0 0 148 $0 D 3 (Senior High) $15422 130 05594 0252 $2,826 23 D —> $6,27360 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value $263,362 Current Capital Levy Rate / $1,000 $174 Current Bond Interest Rate 439% Years Amortized (10 Years) 10 TC —> $3,63633 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facile / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC —> 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $1,055.83 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $20,51804 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $103.32 Subtotal $21,677.19 D = State Match Credit per Residence $6,27360 TC = Tax Credit per Residence $3,636 33 Subtotal 59,909.94 Total Unfunded Need $11,76728 50% Developer Fee Obligation $5,884 FC = Facility Credit (if applicable) 0 District Adjustment (See Page 25 for sigAnaaon) ($256 Net Fee Obligation per Single Family Residence 1 $4,928 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 Page 28 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage I Average Sxe Cost/Acre I Fadldy Capacity I Student Factor $12,055.84 A 1 (Elementary) 11 $108,091 500 0 293 $69675 A 2 (Middle School) 21 $0 1,065 0 058 $0 A 3 (Senior High) 32 $0 1,000 0094 $0 0 445 A—> $69675 Permanent Facility Construction Cost par Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula. ((Facility Cost / Faahty x Student Factor x jPermanent / Total Square Footage Ratio Constrictor Coat Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Rata 8 1 (Elementary) $18,000,000 500 0 293 096 $10,126 08 8 2 (Middle School) $0 1,065 0 058 096 s0 8 3 (Senior High) $48,800,000 2,282 Im 0.96 $1,929 76 0 445 B —> $12,055.84 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula. ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary/ Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost FacilityCapacity Student FauMr Foolap Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $97,000 24 0.293 004 $47.37 C 2 (Middle School) $0 29 0.058 004 $0 C 3 (Senior High) $97,000 31 0.094 004 $1177 0.445 C —> $59.13 Stats Match Credit per Multl-Family Residence Unit Formula, Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x District Match % x Student Factor Area Coat Allowance SPt Sq FL / Student I 0wtW March % I Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $15422 90 05594 0 293 $2.27496 D 2 (Middle School) $15422 117 0 0 058 $0 D 3 (Senior High) 5154.22 130 05594 0 094 $1,054.23 D —> $3,32919 Tax Credit per Multi -Family Residence Unit Average MF Residential Assessed Value $82,971 Current Capital Levy Rate / $1,000 $174 Current Bond Interest Rate 4.39% Years Amortized (10 Years) 10 TC $1,145.61 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility 1 Site Value I Dwelling Units 0 0 FC --> 0 Fee Recep A = Site Acquisition per Multi -Family Unit $6941175 B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $12,055.84 C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $5913 Subtotal $12,811.73 D = State Match Credit per MF Unit $3,32919 TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit $1,145.61 Subtotal $4,47480 Total Unfunded Need $8.33693 50% Developer Fee Obligation $4,168 FC = Facility Credit (if applicable) 0 District Adjustment (See Page 25 for explanation) ($1,134) Net Fee Obligation per MuIL-Famdy Residence Unit 1 $3,034 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 Page 29 IX Summary of Changes to April 2005 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans In effect since 1993. The primary changes from the April 2005 Plan are summarized here. Voters approved funding for replacement and expansion of Panther Lake Elementary School, a future new elementary and classroom additions at high schools to accommodate new growth, renovation of Sequoia Middle School to be reconfigured as an Alternative High School and Phase II of the renovation at MIA Creek Middle School Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in class size as well as program changes. Reduction In class size for Student Achievement Initiative 728 is reflected In this update. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement of portables between facilities. Student enrollment forecast is updated annually At this time, enrollment projections continue to reflect need for future additional capacity at elementary and high school level. The district expects to receive state matching funds for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually Unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future. The biennial student generation factor survey was updated to reflect changes and grade level reconfiguration. Changes reflected no adjustment for occupancy. Survey data is included as Appendix E. Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors include: Comments Student Generation Factor Eiem 0482 0448 Revised Single Family (SF) Ms 0161 0148 Revised SH 0 284 0 252 Revised Total 0.927 0 844 Student Generation Factor Elem 0 293 0 293 Revised but no change. Mult-Family(MF) Ms 0069 0.058 Revised SH 0 114 0 094 Revised Total 0.476 0 445 State Match Credit 54.29% 5594% Per OSPI (+165%) Area Cost Allowance (Boeckh Index) $12981 $15422 Per OSPI Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SF $242,558 $263,382 Per Puget Sound ESD AV - Average of Condominiums & Apts. MF $76,682 $82,971 Per Puget Sound ESD Debt Service Capital Levy Rate / $1000 $184 $174 Per King County Assessment General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 457% 439% Market Rate Impact Fee - Single Family SF $4,775 $4,928 Change to fee - $153 Impact Fee - Multi -Family MF $2,940 $3,034 Change to fee - $94 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2006 Page 30 I X Appendixes Appendix A: Calculations of Capacities for Elementary Schools Appendix B: Calculations of Capacities for Middle Schools Appendix C: Calculations of Capacities for Senior High Schools Appendix D: Use of Relocatables Appendix E: Student Generation Factor Survey Kent Schod District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Apnl 2DD6 Page 31 Ir---, ..I ^ i. IIs .X EI f[I T r' m O O N O• T A T f A N O p O T 0 � f m � m m f N � N l �I �$ Y N J I I H NM I I.n �Id ty L� t g ��pp ��yy ry I �I Sa yao t; I I `_ m VON ffi Y R 3 n�� q � m�� a q! R 7 S� L� n 4 �°. •m- m o o m T I =1 O ri M II VI 1 0 0 0 0 0 ^ 0 0 0 0 =Ila IL I I pI I O s 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 O N N O m m 0 0 c e o 0 0 0 I �i yl10 I Ise in I I@ sX IILL tll y I I �+ a �I I T T T f f • n♦• i• T• m•• a• i m i b IT, dl i f i di f I �I _ R m �IIyW„II.._..._........._..................._..........eIoIN� t �II��'FII ININCW 1 1� p 'I I f W• f T f �I f • f f f T m f • 1p •• l.! • n O O T f f N e+ I `I ei ti W 11 f, .. -- .. - .. __ I I Z a 1 S1 I l s W I IWE ^I!??43WAFh 5 W9 9; 0e0 vaa:901 aIIYFM111OL _o pggy_ sgg €'�ns¢r<�7<a g 2t W m fi$ Y ri F O 2+ e m In I I E I > I 1 I V V= V u W W iL V V i iG J Z Z Z Z G a a d Q h (n to N N 8 - x y t I Is 5 w I 1 1$ 51 1 x s 2 t e_ 1521 'B 31 0�1 A I I a- WI I I "I I I a I WI I 11 511 "I 2 1 1 'W t1 I Q r 4 N I nI 3)I IQ -I Ila N �I I r �- - N INI 13 = 11 511 I I IIS all I I I I 1-91 I f—sl I W o o a N o o �, i"I IIIA= SII" iml I AI w I r--�if I I It -1s1 06 11z ERIN 9 3 IE I1�X0181$ m R " ISI ! I�fll I I X I I• -------- I°I I I K {--{ A s .. H AI,Z11 $ IIS gQ� lel 1^IA x I I-- .1®1 I I a 11—.°I z i I a I-1 k I A x 1 1 a SLI I I I l a S,I_I . I WI I l.0 s ,� a I I, ill N v tO oD A w I SSI I I 1, 1111 M N 141 1 ml a _ a 1 I 01.1 °IJ ' Q I "'I I ;1 1 1 5 &:151 12 9. r 9 4 12 n m am N I I I Ly �I�I I I I NI I`1zTJI_ a m a W II II 51 I II II al i I JI a M a o II IIx $- t 1� 0a151 Il 0�1Ii iL5,li,5 1:fl IPIKk F4 I I Yl 1 m `: 5!9 s m I N I i z i l 1 1 m 8 1 vl I I I I 4 8 5 1 kl I ¢I e r£ m I I I I v ?g t g `_' t o A 1 21 1 1 € 4 t ; I M I of 0 A a v |! 2| !|l | | | | & |! �| ■ ||] H 1 I All III -r| !|i | | | | s II ±| ! a|i ISI !|I | I | | a H m , 211 , _ g . | _ | | a E on I || I ! §|] o o) | | ; , ga m H 2 ; All ; 0 a of | § - © g , | § { LU ■ || |! &| ° ° ■| ■ | B g .111 ! | ± | | a # ||kl� ||| ^ © �| ® | a © © °|© | ■ AS , | ■ H`13 2-41 ° ° m | _ - i E # !! "I : ani -I | ■ - 01 _ | ;Is d H m am | | ■ I | � � a LL H ■ H _ J 2 � a � f | ; » | � : ■ » + f | a | ■ ■ : I! « 11 b a e ■ a l g ! n; a I N e a ■ a ■ a■ i § t£ r I■ ; H w 7 � ■ ! k � § I & a q « ! � ` a E ! ' 4 I `I C G of a0 O HI iD �i �R aZ Nm O, I U% I �i 2S �+f .+f [f N �A I� � O � C• d df I din � I I cI ti � � � .7S M Fi Fi �i N ►rd N eo d � o +� ern °r � N � � S � '�� �( N I ^ C1 -%I N n en eD e0 N d N 0 M d lA eD dJ f iA { A IA eA v; eb d N g NI I I ..I 4 a s SA ea Q S 2' 4 V m 4 3 wi 0!A IM 4 p 4 Q I, en f I I II rI r O r � r O v O r O o v r r O O O N r r r O O O O OI OI Cb cn tt-en-� I V! 13I I N m m en .�. .n.. rz R O X 2 21 e Q ~ r O S N !2 0 V N 7C I %I �(pp p g± pp �y m a�pp 4— 4 W A I I O I e^n e0 tD e+l N aD a0 Y fn M t'n M K O N �D I I G Lo N r r O n C ~O r N O f S!S ._� ._ Cgi n ISD I A I Q (f N N � T G a o U x o co o w>.- o w 3 w; J w x V 3 e) CA w e) S f Y I W I I eA I I enl 2 co I 1 W _ 3 1 I of m I I cI t v 3 a a c I° 1 I enl en '0 b N b uj .� I UZ �. g� Y G LL C b .o J l �1 m = 2 K U b C b T f0 C V I n I I v Q w wj u: el x x i R :3i z z a a d z 05 iA m iy r 45�y 3a 3{ I l i R1 it m V N t:: r m A XI 6 - 6 a g c 4 7r] This page intentionally left blank. Federal Way Public Schools 2007 Capital Facilities Plan _ Building for the Future L 'J `� •. � 1 1 1 IT-- � 11Y .Ili. 1 Building for the Future FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 I CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BOARD OF EDUCATION Ed Barney Evelyn Castellar David Larson Charles Hoff Thomas Madden SUPERINTENDENT Thomas R. Murphy FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION iii -iv SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction 1 Inventory of Educational Facilities 2 Inventory of Non -Instructional Facihties 3 Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities 4 Needs Forecast - New Facilities 5 Six Year Finance Plan 6 SECTION 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Introduction 7 Map - Elementary Boundaries 8 Map - Middle school Boundaries 9 Map - Senior High Boundaries 10 SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction 11 Building Capacities 12-13 Portable Locations 14-15 Student Forecast 16-18 Capacity Summaries 19-23 King County Impact Fee Calculations 24-26 SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2006 PLAN 27-29 I FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, City of Kent Ordinance No. 3260 effective March 1996, and the City of Auburn Ordinance No. 5078 effective 1998, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 2006 Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2006. This Plan is scheduled for adoption by King County, the City of Kent, City of Federal Way and the City of Auburn and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing, ,lobs, services, culture and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies. As the projects from the 1999 bond were finalized, the District presented a 20 -year plan for the renovation and construction of Federal Way Schools and support buildings. Phase 1, a $245 million bond was presented to the voters in February 2006. This received a 54% yes vote, unfortunately not enough to pass The School Board is studying options for placing the bond proposal on the September or November of 2006 ballots If approved, the bond would replace four elementary schools, Lakeland, Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla and one middle school Lakota. Federal Way High School would be replaced and capacity increased by approximately 800 students. Federal Way High School was built in 1938. It has been added onto at least 10 times and currently has an almost maze -like layout. The cost to rebuild is $81 million. The reconstruction would increase the capacity of the high school by 800 students, or by about 33% Part of this cost is included in the Capital Facilities Plan impact fee calculation. The non -instructional projects included in the 20- year plan will consolidate support services operations at a single location. The current Transportation and Maintenance facility cannot continue to meet the District needs in the future. Nutrition services and other administrative functions will also relocate to this centralized location. Because of continued construction inflation, estimated construction costs will be re- calculated prior to the next bond election. iii The District is facing unique challenges with declining enrollment at some levels and anticipated reductions in State funding for education. Elementary populations have declined the past two years and projections show moderate growth at this level. Because of declining enrollment and continuing budget challenges, the concept of closing an elementary school in the near future has resurfaced. A committee will be meeting during the 2006/07 school year to study elementary populations and boundaries. A recommendation from this committee could include consolidating elementary populations in to fewer facilities. Many filters considering educational requirements and fiscal responsibility will be used to develop a recommendation to the Board. Iiv FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The proposed bond package includes shared instructional and community facilities. The current stadium would be moved to align with the City of Federal Way Celebration Park sports fields and future Community Center. A performance auditorium is planned for a comer of the Federal Way High School campus. This is a facility that would serve the District schools as well as the community. An environmental instruction and retreat center is proposed for property adjoining Sequoyah Middle School. In September 2006, the District will open a pilot program at Illahee middle school to allow 5`s grade students to attend. This first program will have fifty 50' grade students receiving instruction on the Illahee Middle School campus. As smaller class sizes roll forward into the secondary levels, we anticipate a slight decline at middle school between 2007 and 2010. Sequoyah Middle School opened in September 2005. With the opening of Sequoyah Middle School the average enrollment at all middle schools is between 650 and 800 students. Another initiative that impacts capacity at the secondary schools is the Puget Sound Early College. Highlme Community College is offering this program to I la' and 12`i' grade students at the Federal Way campus. The program allows promising 1 Vh and 12`s grade students the opportunity to complete their high school diploma and the Associate of Arts college degree in their final two years of high school The District is also considering offering one to four schools with a Kindergarten through 81` grade instructional configuration These schools could be offered at existing sites, with appropriate facility changes. Other options for opening these schools are new construction or purchase and remodel of existing buildings. The district has a cooperative agreement with Head Start for facility use to serve income eligible Pre -Kindergarten students A new Headstart facility on the Harry Truman High School campus opened in January 2005. This facility centralizes Headstart services in the Federal Way community. Headstart was housed at three of the elementary schools in the Federal Way District. Currently the only decentralized program is in a portable facility at Sherwood Forest Elementary. The District is facing unique challenges with declining enrollment at some levels and anticipated reductions in State funding for education. Elementary populations have declined the past two years and projections show moderate growth at this level. Because of declining enrollment and continuing budget challenges, the concept of closing an elementary school in the near future has resurfaced. A committee will be meeting during the 2006/07 school year to study elementary populations and boundaries. A recommendation from this committee could include consolidating elementary populations in to fewer facilities. Many filters considering educational requirements and fiscal responsibility will be used to develop a recommendation to the Board. Iiv 6 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 1- THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. A Financial Plan which shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization Iisted follows this. I FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Adelaide Brigadoon Camelot Enterprise Green Gables Lake Dolloff Lake Grove Lakeland Mark Twain Meredith Hill Mirror Lake Nautilus Olympic View Panther Lake Rainier View Sherwood Forest Silver Lake Star Lake Sunnycrest Twin Lakes Valhalla Wildwood Woodmont MIDDLE SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Academy Illahee Kilo Lakota Sacajawea Saghalie Sequoyah Totem SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Decatur Federal Way Thomas Jefferson Todd Beamer Harry S Truman ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS Merit School LEASED SPACES Internet Academy I 1635 SW 304th Street 3601 SW 336th Street 4041 S 298th Street 35101 5th Avenue SW 32607 47th Avenue SW 4200 S 308th Street 303 SW 308th Street 35675 32nd Avenue S 2450 S Star Lake Road 5830 S 300th Street 625 S 314th Street 1000 S 289th Street 2626 SW 327th Street 34424 1 st Avenue S 3015 S 368th Street 34600 12th Avenue SW 1310 SW 325th Place 4014 S 270th Street 24629 42nd Avenue S 4400 SW 320th Street 27847 42nd Avenue S 2405 S 300th Street 26454 16th Avenue S. 34620 9" Avenue S 36001 1st Avenue S 4400 S 308th Street 1415 SW 314th Street 1101 S Dash Point Road 33914 19th Avenue SW 3450 S 360`' ST 26630 40" Ave S 2800 SW 320th Street 30611 16th Avenue S 4248 S 288th Street 35999 16th Ave S 31455 28th Ave S 36001 1" Ave S 32020 1 st Ave S 2 Federal Way Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Kent Kent Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Des Moines Federal Way Federal Way Auburn Federal Way Federal Way Federal Way Auburn Kent 98023 98023 98001 98023 98023 98001 98023 98001 98003 98001 98003 98003 98023 98003 98003 98023 98023 98032 98032 98023 98001 98003 98198 98003 98003 98001 98023 98003 98023 98001 98032 Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 98003 Auburn 98001 Federal Way 98003 Federal Way 98003 Federal Way 98003 Federal Way 98003 J FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CURRENT INVENTORY NON -INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. I I ! 3 Developed Property Administrative Building 31405 18th Avenue S Federal Way 98003 MOT Site 1066 S 320th Street Federal Way 98003 Central Kitchen 1344 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 Leased Snace Community Resource Center 1813 S Commons Federal Way 98003 Available Office Space 30819 14th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Undeveloped Property Site F Location 75 65 SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW — 9.2 Acres S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S — 8.8 Acres 60 E of 10th Avenue SW - SW 334th & SW 335th Streets - 10.04 Acres 73 71 N of SW 320°i and east of 45th PL SW — 23.45 Acres S 344th Street & 46th Avenue S - 17.47 Acres 82 1' Way S and S 342°d St — Ntnimal acreage 74 3737 S 360th St - 47.13 Acres (Part of this site is being used for Sequoyah Middle School) 96 S 308th St and 14'" Ave S —.36 Acres 81 S 332ad St and 9d Ave S — 20 Acres Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. I I ! 3 l FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN I 11 I I I I I I NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS Purchase and Relocate Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is Portables Irri act Fees. Elementary Schools: Replace Existing Building Future Bond Sales Lakeland, Panther Lake, Sunn crest and Valhalla Lakota Middle School Replace Existing Building Future Bond Sales Federal Way High School Replace Existing Building, Future Bond Sales Increase Capacit The District is also planning the replacement of some non -instructional facilities. The District has purchased 20 acres for construction of consolidated facilities for support services functions. Transportation, Nutrition Services, Maintenance and other non -instructional functions will be housed at this centralized location. As part of the 20 -year plan, the District intends to increase capacity for high school students with expansion at the Decatur High School site. Increased capacity at Federal Way High in Phase 1 and at Decatur High in Phase 2 supplant the need for construction of a fifth comprehensive high school. 4 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST - NEW FACILITIES NEW FACILITY LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS No current plans for new facilities. �l I 5 ■ 11 $gal .���I��I�I Irl E� %D s d d IsI I lalxiW lolololol aA 1 Iml I I lolololololol I I I'dIM ■ A A III I R''IA ICIGIdIC.AIrl ATI I I WI1I_ICI'Al -w-A I I l4vill � : A II IIIIIW 11111"'1 All IIIIIIIIIII IIY .� ■ A 1 IIIIIW ►fill 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I M AOL1 A IIIIIW IIIII 1 1/31 d1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 a 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I LI I I I I I I I I Li � M I I 1621'61.OM Iul -11d I I _ M I I I I I I I ISI I I I IA � a' I A l lel lel W_1 M12111 1 Iel�l I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I IBI $ 1& I A I�I I�I "I 15 FI r)M-1 1 ' H 1 ' ' ` ' ' `o L' ' ' 'a A � ME I I I I I I I Vi 1001 1 1 1 Ie11V I I I I I I I IRI I I I Inl Ia I I IIIIIW I I I I I I FIN I I I I I I I R I I 1121 t✓� � I rl I I I I 19152MIR! 1! II II IIIII 11 I I I I I A OR191 I I I I Ilaloll I I I Itn41 7 1 12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1-1 1 1 1 1 11 1"1"1 1 1 1 1401 -O_ � a 1 _9 I Ial I I Iglgl8lglil I I I I IRII � SI S 1 1 FIC I I I I I I Ae i i i I Ao 1 v� Isl 1 1 1 1191 1 1 1 1 1 1 1CM x l 1� s I I"1 'S, e ■ 1 .� � G 1�'I�I I I I I I I I I I I I lal8r �� l� a l a � s ■ Y c% 6 hIt'at211ra1"`t'T 1 1' 1 '1 IYII Wal - e 9 A 4; 1 t I I Al 14111 t 9 i s 9 g 1 IS c IMAM "I! 1ItIiI1I 11191 dr 9 -25w .a ■ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 la`I�IEI I I 4�°�> �' E o � g r ral 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 loEPI I I S a w e ■ 1 Hall _1 1.91 IJ I ll k.2 l; 1 131 131 la1 �'slI 8111131 I r l; N s I; ■ 1 Izl �1!:EN 51 Cal 111 MOWAti1 g1f,1 I ll s 8�3 t e it 9 a L 1 1 21Vlam:PaI ;!I El4lalmlwPK.-i _1 r 1 I I1�1�1 1 1a17�I§r1#1 131 11; 4 A k 4 4 4 A A Elm- � FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 2 - MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools (the District) has twenty-three elementary schools (grades K-5), seven middle school schools (grades 6-8), five senior high schools (grades 09-12) and one school serving students in grades 6 -10 for the 2005/06 school year. The Internet Academy serves grades K-12. In January 2005 the Board of Education adopted new secondary boundaries beginning with 2005/06 school year. The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school, by school type. (Harry S Truman High School, Merit School, Internet Academy and Federal Way Public Academy serve students from throughout the District). The identified boundaries are reviewed annually. Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs that affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas. The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School Districts are different. If the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not lust one school. It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the constriction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single development. I I 11 I F7 FMTi NTA RV gV14001. BOUNDARIES Federal Way Fubhc S>MOOls 1 I � �,��9� •..w �'4— 1 SWI ELEMSH7•AEr /CHOOLS MIDDLE SCHOOLS =1 3 canwat M; u � w 1 I V'4W4T iftWil Ill T1 = lA�E'�f L Lake OolloM 0.6 96 room 0-0 -- ` - - _ ,,. Sr �.`4C7.4.�" I L.\w Groves G 96 Fwdmwl Wmr ftbM Autlriw FA ^ riA.Ji�i fly 6 Mm 1 W.IrI fy 1 I 1' IL 1111 •.i 10 Mwndkh HI ■ I46 mmom ICON ■'CMoOLA 19 Oymple Vllx F7 X006- I v li'%? IAL �/� '"• W al 10 1, 6 o- u i:lAN,6■ �. I I i��";I .: D`:� Ails 1 1■ mumyVest 90 Wakes 54 I _j, •aa -{ rr'V 17 99 va■allo.n N 81k■lu■611w --- — *ss Id I �+��"^ n r11.= :1 1k][>i10111 1 ee"I IMP `4;E XIMT4 IK ..cdru WAV we cA / kR10A V/CIN/TY ® 1 / D"'' �. r�"�i_��'R� X7.9 L r l.Ly i i8°vZTm : r- D /Flat I cc �f11 ii°°"° I�r•tf�J3�'.;I �°1e!4�'����`/�`�1l_������A�a�►:�'��'�. W 1 / 4M. �.• Ila......... .\\ . f 7 � }�J"MA ry D✓� �1 Z M6 y "yy^ •h.v 1``- •-z�1�1 -1O ._ T;1 t ria— I--a"-y-4-� I -�.0 A4 l�` ? f = ' `r'':°Y� 1 r LCL. Inc""I•,. ".��� -r-=7'F5r !/I \ '-�dt '� � i . , l 111 ! C' l `�f.� '"",'' / �► 71 1 \�'9�`.•y��..�'�!!;a(`�•���-I �. bxla� i ' tr .K��._. ��%\IfI�--I'�=1f�% 1 N —i 6111 LrI 11 A' IF, �1 s 1 b `iE1Nrt1 I:I .l .1"' I m���6fJJ,'i 1 Y �yL.� �I'� il.i i 1177"l7 1 IN \ °moi l' ./ q.lL7vi••w_i"/# 6�d PMpral Wav Pi hlir_ Schools 1' 12.-- b/ � 5- k #,--341 I ' L = s I �� ■ •' I E ' i v 1 n w C-1 �L 0 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities - The Education Program IPortable Locations Student Forecast - 2007 through 2013 Capacity Summaries King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi Family Units 11 I a; FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IBuilding Capacities This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. The District has identified a Building Program Capacity for each of the schools in the District. This Full Time Equivalent (FTE) capacity is based on: • The number of classrooms available in each school • Any special requirements at each school In general, the District's current target class size provides that the average class size for a standard classoom for grades K through 2 should be 20 students. For grades 3-5 the target is 25 students. In sixth and seventh grade the students are scheduled with block instruction and see only two teachers for core curriculum. Teachers at this level see 60 students per day. At eighth grade, the teachers will see 90 students per day. For grades 9-12 the target class size is 26 students. In the 2005/06 school year, all of the 23 elementary schools offer at least one all day t Kindergarten. This program does have capacity impacts, as the classroom is only available for one session of Kindergarten for the full day. I 1 12 I FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITIES ELEMENTARY BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY School Nano Headcount FTE Adelaide 444 424 Briadoon 460 440 Camelot 342 322 Enterprise 404 384 Green Gables 432 412 Lake Dolloff 490 470 Lake Grove 399 379 Lakeland 425 405 Mark Twain 440 444 Meredith Hill 437 417 Mirror Lake Nautilus 450 430 Olympic View 399 379 Panther Lake 432 412 Rainier View Sherwood Forest 489 469 Silver Lake 502 482 Star Lake 474 454 Sunn crest 424 404 Twin Lakes 450 430 Valhalla 477 457 Wildwood 445 425 Woodmont 375 355 10,014 MIDDLE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount FTE Illahee 799 807 Kilo 799 807 Lakota 750 758 Saca'awea 774 782 Saghalse, 694 701 Sequoyab 700 707 Totem 735 1 742 Federal Way Public Academy 212 214 2006 TOTAL 5,463 5,518 5chokil Average 1 375 1 884 SENIOR HIGH BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount FTE Decatur 1269 1,343 Federal Way 1456 1,541 Thomas Jefferson 1435 1,519 Todd Beamer 1331 1409 Truman High School 200 200 Federal Way Public Academy 133 133 2006 TOTAL t -51-k-16,145 JOSeni(ir High Average 1 1,373 1 1, Ifflementary Average ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount FTE Merit School 16 16 Notes: 2006 TOTAL 16 16 * Federal Way Public Academy capacity is not used in calculated average. * Truman High School capacity is not used in calculated average. 13 I # FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Portable Locations The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not an efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students until permanent facilities can be built or boundary adjustments can be made. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. It is the practice and philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that portables are not acceptable as permanent facilities. The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for temporary ' educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. 1 14 I u FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS PORTABLES LOCATED AT VINMF.NTARY WIRMIA PORTABLES LOCATED AT MIDDLE SCHOOL 4 INMUMonAL non msr UMOKAL Adelaide 3 7 Bn adoon 1 Saca'awea Camelot Saghalie 1 Enterpnse 2 Ment Green Gables 1 30 Lake Dolloff 2 Lake Grove 2 Lakeland 2 Mark Twain 3 Meredith Hill 3 Muror Lake 4 Nautilus 1 Olympic view Panther Lake 3 Rainier View 3 Sherwood Forest 4 Silver Lake 4 Star Lake 2 2 Sunn crest 1 1 Twin Lakes 2 1 Valhalla 1 1 W ildwood 4 Woodmont ITUTAL 52 PORTABLES LOCATED AT MIDDLE SCHOOL 4 15 PORTABLES LOCATED AT CFNIr1R HTGURK OWML RMUCTIONAL Illahee 5 Kilo 7 Lakota 3 Saca'awea 4 Saghalie 4 ,Totem 5 Ment 2 30 15 PORTABLES LOCATED AT CFNIr1R HTGURK PORTABLES LOCATED AT SUPPORT FACILITIES OT 1 C 3 TOTAL 4 HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES Sherwood Forest 1 ota NM ihsrournoru� nsnucnowAL Decatur 9 Federal Way 3 Thomas Jefferson 7 Todd Beamer 8 TOTAL 27 PORTABLES LOCATED AT SUPPORT FACILITIES OT 1 C 3 TOTAL 4 HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES Sherwood Forest 1 ota II FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level. The Enrollment Master software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment. In November of 2001, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District. The report was complete in January 2002. The model used to forecast next year's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, 16 U Student Forecast Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. I Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school -building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students. The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study several projections Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted. A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level. The Enrollment Master software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment. In November of 2001, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District. The report was complete in January 2002. The model used to forecast next year's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, 16 U IFEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 11 I I I assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county -wide average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections. The long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes in the 5-19 age group for King County. Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of something else (e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend for the school-age population over time. The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2015. This model produces a projection that is between 24,000 and 26,000 when applied to the low, medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models. The District will contract with an independent demographer to update these projections after the October 12006 enrollment counts. 11 I I I Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington. Near term projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by current local economic conditions. The District tracks new development from four permitting jurisdictions. Long range planning assumes a student yield from proposed new housing consistent with historical growth patterns. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school district community in the future. 11 I I I FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACILITES PLAN Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections Simplified FTE (K Headcount = 5 FTE, Middle School FTE= 99 Headcount, Senior High FTE = 945Headcount) Total K -12 Per Calendar Yr School Year Elementary Mlddle School Sealer High FFE C6c 2001 2000-01 11,640 5,305 4,338 21,283 22,000 2002 2001-02 11,498 5,337 4,467 21,302 0.1% 2003 2002-03 11,202 5,454 4,437 21,093 -1.00/0 2004 0 2003-04 9,127 5,524 6,408 21,059 -0.2% 2005 200405 9,164 5,473 6,515 21,152 0.4% 2006 2005-06 9,105 5,309 6,770 21,184 0.2% 2007 81006.07 8,937 5,081 7,005 21,024 -0.8% 2008 P2007-08 9,134 4,959 7,057 21,150 Q6% 2009 P2008-09 9,189 4,915 6,988 21,192 0.1% 2010 P2009-10 9,386 4,949 4925 21,260 0.3% 2011 P2010-11 9,S01 S,038 6,741 21,282 0.1% 2012 P1011-11 91589 5,111 6,671 21,382 0.5% 2013 P2012-13 9,614 5,212 6,714 21,550 15.000 • New Configuraiio Elementary K -S Middle School 6-8 frgh School 9-12 18 Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast 22,000 08% 06% 21,000 , 0.4% 20,000 02% W0.0% 19,000 u m n -02% 18,000 c -0.4% X 17,000 -06% 2 fl< -0.8% 16,000 10% 15.000 i. 120/6 y School Year =FTEtPercentofChange 18 , �x u 2 fl< H i. 18 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Capacity Summaries All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and Senior High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs number of students at elementary, middle school, and senior high levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year. i9 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS CAPITAL FACILITES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - ALL GRADES CAPACITY 1 21,024 Budget - -- Projected - Calendar Year Calendar 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2012 School Year 2006/07 20076/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY FTE CAPACITY 21,301 21,241 21,275 21,215 21,249 21,189 21,223 21,163 21,197 21,137 21,197 21,137 21,997 21,937 Add or subtract changes to capacity Special Education Changes Increase Capacity at Federal Way High (26) (26) (26) (26) 2,725 1100 2,725 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 21,275 21,249 21,223 21,197 21,197 21,997 21,997 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 21,215 21,189 21,163 21,137 21,137 1 21,937 21,937 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 1 21,024 21,150 21,192 21,260 21,282 21,382 21,550 Internet Academy Enrollment (AAFTE) 288 288 1 288 1 288 1 288 1 288 1 288 1 Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 20,736 20,862 20,904 20,972 20,994 21,094 21,262 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) 2,575 2,725 2,725 2,725 2,725 2,725 2,462 PROGRAM FTE CAPACITY 479 327 259 165 143 843 675 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY Current Portable Capacity 2,575 2,725 2,725 2,725 2,725 2,725 2,462 Add/Subtract Portable Capacity 1 1 1 1 1 Add New Portable Capacity 3,204 3,052 2,984 21890 2,868 3,56$ 3,137 Deduct Portable Capacity Adjusted Portable Capacity 2,725 2,725 2,725 2,725 2,725 2,725 2,462 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE 1 1 1 1 1 CAPACITY 3,204 3,052 2,984 21890 2,868 3,56$ 3,137 20 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS CAPITAL FACILITES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS CAPACITY 1 8,937 Budget - - Projected - - Calendar Year 2007 2008 2009 1010 2011 2012 2012 School Year 2006/07 20076/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 BUILDING PROGRAM HEAD COUNT CAPACITY FTE CAPACITY 10,014 9,578 9,988 9,552 9,962 9,526 9,936 9,500 91910 9,474 9,910 90474 9,910 9,474 1 Special Education Changes (26) (26) (26) (26) Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 9,988 9,962 9,936 9,910 9,910 9,910 9,910 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 9,552 9,526 9,500 9,474 9,474 9,474 9,474 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 1 8,937 9,134 9,289 9,386 9,502 9,589 9,614 2 Internet Academy (AAFTE) 32 1.32 32 32 32 1 32 1 32 1 Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 8,905 9,102 9,257 9,354 9,470 9,557 9,582 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) 1 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 PROGRAM CAPACITY 647 424 243 120 4 (83) (108} RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3. Current Portable Capacity Add/Subtract portable capacity 1,350 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 Adjusted Portable Capacity 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE 1 1 1 1 1 CAPACITY 1947, 1,724 1,543 1,4201 1,304 1,217 11192 NOTES: 1. Add Special Education and ECEAP Programs This reduces Baste Education capacity in the school years indicated. 2. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 3 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. Li FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS CAPITAL FACILITES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - MIDDLE SCHOOLS CAPACITY 1 5,082 Budget - Projected - - Calendar Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2012 School Year 2006/07 20076/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010111 2011112 2012/13 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY FTE CAPACITY 5,463 5,518 5,518 5,518 5,518 5,518 5,518 5,518 5,518 5,518 5,518 5,518 5,518 5,518 750 750 750 750 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5,518 5,518 5,518 5,518 5,518 5,518 5,518 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 5,518 5,518 5,518 5,518 5,518 5,518 5,518 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 1 5,082 4,959 4,915 4,949 5,038 5,121 5,222 1. Internet Academy (AAFTE) 92 92 1 92 1 92 92 92 1 92 Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 4,990 4,867 4,823 4,857 4,946 5,029 5,130 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) 1 750 750 750 750 750 750 PROGRAM CAPACITY 528 651 695 661 572 489 388 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 2.. Current Portable Capacity 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 Add/Subtract portable capacity Add new portable capacity Adjusted Portable Capacity 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE 1 1 1 3. CAPACITY 1,278 1,401 1,445 1,411 1,322 1,239 1,138 NOTES: 1. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 2. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables will deternune feasibility for continued instructional use. 3. Capacity for unhoused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and no planning time in some classrooms. 22 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS CAPITAL FACILITES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS CAPACITY 7,005 Budget Projected - - Calendar Year 2007 2008 1 2009 2010 2011 2012 1 2012 School Year 2006107 20076/08 12008109 2009110 2010111 2011112 12012113. BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY FTE CAPACITY 5,824 6,145 5,824 6,145 5,824 6,145 5,824 6,145 5,824 6,145 5,824 6,145 6,624 6,945 Add or subtract changes in capacity Increase Capacity at Federal Way High School 800 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5,824 5,824 5,824 5,824 5,824 6,624 6,624 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 6,145 6,145 6,145 6,145 6,145 6,945 6,945 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment �7 7,005 7,057 6,988 6,925 6,742 6,672 6,714 1. Internet Academy (AAFTE) 164 164 164 164 1 1 164 164 1 164 1 Basic Ed without Internet Academy 6,841 6,893 6,824 6,761 6,578 6,508 6,550 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) 475 675 675 675 675 675 675 PROGRAM CAPACITY 1 (1,017) 1 (1,069) 1 (1,000) 1 (937) f (754) 116 74 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 2. Current Portable Capacity 475 675 675 675 675 675 675 3. Add new portable capacity 200 Adjusted Portable Capacity 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE 4. CAPACITY (3 11) (394) (325) (262) (79) 791 749 NOTES: 1. Internet Academy students are included in projection but do not require full time use of school facilities. 2. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques witch can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory Age and condition of the portables will deterrmne feasibility for continued instructional use. 3 Add Portable Capacity 4 Capacity for unboused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and no planning time to some classrooms. Puget Sound Early College will house approximately 60 of the unhoused students. 23 rFEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 1 King County, the City of Federal Way, and the City of Kent Impact Fee Calculations ' Single and Multi -Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was ' established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substantially adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a ' "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi -family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that district. M- STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single- family units and multi -family units. The factors used in the 2007 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single-family units that were constructed in the ' last five (5) years. - IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Following the calculations for the student generation factor is a copy of the Impact Fee Calculation for single family and multi -family units based on King County Code 21A and the ' Growth Management Act. ➢ Temporary Facility Cost is the average cost of a portable purchased within the last 12 months. D Site Acquisition Costs is the per acre cost of the last school site purchased (site 45); this is a negotiated purchase price. Plan Year 2007 Plan Year 2006 Single Family Units $3,018. $3,393. Multi -Family Units $856. $ 895. I I I 24 >r ■ i� I Ig LLl l l�lo{d 0l l�lo{ ■ ■ I Ix � isIN181�1�I�I�INlatml�l 1� IS � �I�IAI !�� I� fn LLlololo101o101�l0l�l01 Iall Is fa alo-101 Ia1 ■ I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I, l MTI -,7 I Ig 1.'1 Ig s -1-1-1 1.1 I U�I�I�ININI�IaI�INII^I ISI 1-9310161 141 I I I "1 If I I I I I 1 Ir.. IIIIIIIIIIII:1 Ir_ IIIII 1 I$ILn LnI�III II�a Iilol�l 1.1 � � 1 I� IIIIIIIIIIIII I� IIIII I'd R.11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ib�° 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 R? 1I 1 '1' i" IrFFI� l 1"141 I IE s 91'IFIc'I I ■ I zN n 16291 I I I I I I I I I I I I Is�l 1 1 1 1 all ILL KIWII�i°'I'"I I' I"IW1�1^1 1 y 1E I I'I"! 1 ■� 1� z '� I� I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 '� I� IIII � I�� � I� r• ._I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 = I. a _IIII ■ I �- IE € 1�1m1N1�1.1�IN1N1m1�ial I 14 k .9191F1M1 I �+ 1 � � IZ�"'IIIIIIIIIIIII 3 IZ�"'IIII ■ �: 1 z I I f~TI-1 I I ■ P 1 ■ 1 I_ r I I I 1 11 1 11 1 1 1 1 I� `a 11-1-1...lcvl_ I I I_ I iml�l I 11F ° I I I Illlllilllllll 111111 ■ IIII III ( I I I I I..i I I I I I�I _ ,� Ill I I I I I Iml I I I I al ISI I I lei ■ Irl I IcIRI I*2IWI I4eI IN 11 Im-1 1s1l1 IWlml l l¢I�ITI- 141101' III ILUI IPI' III ■ I�I'III�Iml�l�l�lal�l ISI lallml 10.1 I It5161,5I--NZffilciP M3:I I I I I RM ■ 1 I I�J�Ial�l�l°I�i�l�l IJ I I. &a 1 1 Ln N FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPTIAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE School Site Acquisition Coat: Student Student Facility Cost) Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Costl Acreage Acre Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary ., Middle School Sr High ._....,.,.0.00 $0 417 0.3291 01121 21.80 587,747 921 _ 01843 00423 1.20 $173.833 133 0 2268 00698 TOTAL S0 SO $383 $88 $356 $109 $739 $197 School Construction Cost: % Perm FacJ Facility Total So Pt Cost Elementary Nhddle School Sr High Student Student Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ ranar,iv CFR MFR CFR MFR 96.08% 9608% 96.08% SO417 $152,956 $3 $28,968,637 9211_. 933 03291 8,!3j 022681 0.1121 $0 $0 00423 00698 $3,529 $810 $6,766 1 $2,082 TOTAL $10 $2,892 Temporary Facility Cost: % Temp Fac. Facility Total Sq Ft Cost Elementary Middle School Sr High Student Student Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cosy C»r CFR MFR CFR MFR 3.9 �1 3 92% 3.92% $0 SO .....,...... .... _. 5128,106 M 25 _.... M 25 25 0 3291 0 1843 »....._ _._._ 0.2268 0.1121 00423 .........._..........._ 00698 $0 $0 $0 $0 $46 $14 TOTAL $46 $14 State Matching Credit Calculation: Boeck Cost( Sq. Ft. Sq Ft Student Elementary Middle School New Sr High Student Student State Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Matrh CFR MFR CFR MFR $154 2290 $154.22 $15422 117 130 000% 000% 6790% 0 3291 0 1121. » 0 1843 00423 02268 00698 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,815 $866 Total $2,815 $866 Tax Payment Credit Calculation Average Assessed Value (April 2006) Capital Bond Interest Rate (April 2006) Net Present Value of Average Dwelling Years Amortized Property Tax Levy Rate Present Value of Revenue Stream SFR MFR $245,644 . _ $57,873 ._....4 4 39%...... _ R e $1,9.54,267 5460,420 10 SI 14 SI 14 m_ $2,228 $525 PTI Single Fly Multi Family R e Residences Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost $ 739 $ 197 Permanent Facility Cost $ 10,294 $ 2,892 Temporary Facility Cost $ 46 $ 14 State Match Credit $ (2,815) $ (866) Tax Payment Credit $ (2,228) $ (525) Sub -Total $ 6,036 $ 1,712 50% Local Share $ 3,018 $ 856 ct Fee $ 3,018 $ 856 PTI I FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2006 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The 207 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document, based on the 2006 Capital Facilities Plan. The changes between the 2006 Plan and the 2007 Plan are listed below. SECTION M - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION CAPACITY Elementary school capacity reflects program changes for the 2006!07 school year. Elementary capacity includes space for All Day Kindergarten programs at every elementary school. 1 Building Program Capacities are found on page 13. PORTABLES The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page 15. STUDENT FORECAST The Student Forecast now covers 2007through 2013. Enrollment history and projections are found on page 18. CAPACITY SUMMARY The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and ' student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 20-23. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY CODE 21A ' The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors. The adjustment made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 2006 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2007 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page 29. I 1 27 SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN The Six Year Finance Plan has been rolled forward to reflect 2007/2013 SECTION M - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION CAPACITY Elementary school capacity reflects program changes for the 2006!07 school year. Elementary capacity includes space for All Day Kindergarten programs at every elementary school. 1 Building Program Capacities are found on page 13. PORTABLES The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page 15. STUDENT FORECAST The Student Forecast now covers 2007through 2013. Enrollment history and projections are found on page 18. CAPACITY SUMMARY The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and ' student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 20-23. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY CODE 21A ' The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors. The adjustment made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 2006 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2007 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page 29. I 1 27 I ' FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ' Sequoyah: 20 x $80,000 = $1,600,000 FWPA $ 312.900 (60 % of $521.500.1.8 acres of 3 acre parcel) Total Cost $1,912,900 ' Cost/Acreage $1,912,900/21.8 = $87,747 cost per acre Senior High FWPA $ 208.600 (40% of $521.500.1.2 acres of 3 acre parcel) Cost/Acreage $ 208,600/1.2 = $173,833 cost per acre SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COSTS The cost for Federal Way Public Academy (exclusive of land) is $4,921,594. The Federal Way Public Academy costs are split 60% to middle school and 40% to senior high in the e impact fee calculation. Middle school construction costs = 60% of $4,921,594 $ 2,952,956 FWPA $15,400,000 Sequoyah Total Cost $18,352,956 The total cost for replacing Federal Way High School is projected to be $81m. The capacity of the school would increase from approximately 1500 to 2400 students The Impact Fee calculation used one-third, $27m as the basis for capacity increases at high school. High school construction costs = 40% of $4,921,594 $ 1,9682,637 FWPA $27,000,000 Federal Way High Total Cost $2899689637 28 I IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2005 TO 2006 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in student Generation factors between the 2006 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2007Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age of the developments and the year placed in the survey. The Student Generation worksheet is found on page 25. SITE ACQUISITION COSTS The negotiated purchase price for the Todd Beamer High School site was $80,000 per acre. This is the base line cost for acreage for Sequoyah Middle School. The assessed valuation for the Federal Way Public Academy land was $521,000 at the time of purchase ' The calculated cost per acre in the impact fee calculation is a weighted calculation using the $80,000 per acre baseline cost and the assessed valuation at the time of purchase for the Federal Way Public Academy. Federal Way Public Academy is a 3 -acre site. The grade span for this facility is grades 6-10. Middle school accounts for 60% of the cost; senior high is 40%. ' Sequoyah: 20 x $80,000 = $1,600,000 FWPA $ 312.900 (60 % of $521.500.1.8 acres of 3 acre parcel) Total Cost $1,912,900 ' Cost/Acreage $1,912,900/21.8 = $87,747 cost per acre Senior High FWPA $ 208.600 (40% of $521.500.1.2 acres of 3 acre parcel) Cost/Acreage $ 208,600/1.2 = $173,833 cost per acre SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COSTS The cost for Federal Way Public Academy (exclusive of land) is $4,921,594. The Federal Way Public Academy costs are split 60% to middle school and 40% to senior high in the e impact fee calculation. Middle school construction costs = 60% of $4,921,594 $ 2,952,956 FWPA $15,400,000 Sequoyah Total Cost $18,352,956 The total cost for replacing Federal Way High School is projected to be $81m. The capacity of the school would increase from approximately 1500 to 2400 students The Impact Fee calculation used one-third, $27m as the basis for capacity increases at high school. High school construction costs = 40% of $4,921,594 $ 1,9682,637 FWPA $27,000,000 Federal Way High Total Cost $2899689637 28 I FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2007 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2006 TO 2007 IMPACT FEE Item From/To Comment Percent of Permanent Facilities 96.60 to 96.08% Report #3 OSPI Percent Temporary Facilities 3.40 to 3.92% Updated portable inventory Average Cost of Portable $82,151 to $128,106 Updated average of portables Classroom purchased and placed in 2005 Boeck Cost/Sq. Ft $129.81 to $154.22 Change per OSPI State Match 59.97 % (No Change) Average Assessed Value SFR — Per Puget Sound Educational $224,943 to $245,644 Service District (ESD 12 1) MFR — $53,384 to $57,873 Capital Bond Interest Rate 4.57% to 4.39% Market Rate Property Tax Levy Rate $1.04 to $1.14 King County Treasury Division Single Family Student Yield Updated Housing Inventory Elementary .3138 to.3030 Middle School .1632 to .2013 High School .1695 to .2013 Multi -Family Student Yield Updated Housing Inventory Elementary .119 to .0929 Middle School .042 to .0410 High School .053 to .0628 29 Mission Federal Way Public Schools is obligated to educate all students in academic knowledge, skills, abilities and responsible behavior to be successful, contributing members of a free society Vision All students proficient in reading and math All students will meet or exceed standards to reading and math on all WASL tests, Federal Way Public Schools 3140518'h Avenue S Federal Way, Washington 98003-5433 (253) 945-2000 This document is published by the Business Services Department of the Federal Way Public Schools June 2006. ' Federal Way Public Schools 0 Every Student, a Reader This page intentionally left blank AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN RECEIVED 2006 through 2012 JUN 2 1 2006 CITY OF KENT SERVICES Auburn Mountainview High School Lakeland Hills Elementary School Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors April 24, 2006 w i AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 408 915 Fourth Street NE Auburn, Washington 98002 (253) 931-4900 Serving Students in Unincorporated King County Unincorporated Pierce County City of Auburn City of Algona City of Kent City of Pacific i BOARD of DIRECTORS Ray Vefik Carol Helgerson Craig Schumaker Therald Leonard Janice Nelson Linda S Cowan, Superintendent AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT "Avenue to Excellence" Table of Contents Section I Executive Summary ....................... Page 1 Section 11 Enrollment Projections... ............ ..... Page 6 Section III Standard of Service ....................... Page 8 Section IV Inventory of Facilities.... ......... . Page 15 Section V Pupil Capacity ............................. Page 18 Section VI Capital Construction Plan ......... ..... Page 20 Section VII Impact Fees ................ ............. Page 23 Section VIII Appendices Page 27 Appendix A 1 - Student Enrollment Projections Page 28 Appendix A 2 - Capital Facilities Plan Projections Page 42 Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey Page 45 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 Executive Summary This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Auburn School District (the "District") as the District's principal planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2006. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities; and other needs of the District as may be required. However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and within the City of Auburn and City of Kent; the King County Council, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction's respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of Algona and Pacific, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, the Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. The Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the District's specific needs. In general, the District's current standard provides that class size for grades K-2 should not exceed 25 students; class size for grades 3-4 should not exceed 27 students; class size for grade 5 should not exceed 30 students. When averaged over the six elementary grades, this computes to 26.5 students per classroom Class size for grades 6-12 should not exceed 30 students, with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers. (See Section III for more specific information.) The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service and the existing inventory of facilities Including transitional classrooms. The District's 2005-06 capacity was 12,976 whereas Full Time Equivalent ("FTE") enrollment for this same period was 13,386.64 The actual number of individual students was 14,088 as of October 1, 2005. (See Section V for more specific information.) The capital construction plan shown in Section VI addresses the additions to the District's existing facilities. This provided for a new high school approved by the voters in February 2003 and opened in September 2005 and the addition of two new elementary schools approved by the voters in February 2005 Also, the acquisition of a new middle school site and construction of a new middle school is needed to accommodate growth. The new facilities are required to meet the projected student population increase to be generated from the large development areas within the Auburn School District. Two areas that have significant impact on the school district are the Lakeland South and the Lea Hill areas of the district. There are other pockets of development that impact the District as well. The Pierce County area includes most of the Lakeland South development and some adjacent undeveloped properties. The City of Kent has an area of approximately 158 acres that was sold to developers in 2004. The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the fiscal impact incurred by a District experiencing growth and development Section VII sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multi -family dwelling units. The student generation factors have been generated using the students who actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and multi -family developments constructed in the last five years. The method of collecting the data is with the use of GIS mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County GIS; and to integrate the mapping with student data from the District data system. This method gives the District actual student generation numbers for each grade span for identified developments. This data is contained in Appendix A.3. Aubum School Distnct No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2012 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CHANGES FROM 2005 TO 2006 Listed below Is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2005 Capital Facilities Plan that area part of the 2006 PVan The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference Executive Summary A Updated to reflect new information within the Plan B Summary level list of changes from previous year Section 11 Enrollment Projections Updated projections See Appendices A.1 $ A.2 Section III Standard of Service A Increase In English as a Second Language program required 1 additional classroom at the elementary level B. Increase of 1 learning specialist classroom at elementary level C. Increase of 1 early childhood classroom at elementary level D Increase of 1 structured learning classroom at elementary level Section ry Inventory of Facilities A Updated to Include Lakeland Hills Elementary School in inventory, opening 2006 B. Updated to reflect new OSPI square footage space allocations Section V Pupil Capacity A Updated to include Lakeland Hills Elementary School in Inventory, opening 2006. B Updated to reflect new OSPI square footage space allocations Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2012 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Section VII Impact Fees CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2005 to 2006 DATA ELEMENTS CPF 2005 CPF 2006 EXPLANATION Student Generation Factors Single Family Consistent with King County Ordinance 11621, Elementary 03216 03010 Student Generation Factors are calculated Mid School 01584 01510 by the school district based on district Sr High 0 1632 01660 records of average actual student generation Multi -Family rates for new developments constructed Elementary 00687 00611 over the last five years Mid School 00462 00317 Sr High 0 0486 00452 School Construction Costs Elementary $15,600,000 $16,900,000 Updated project estimated costs Facility Capacity Elementary 650 550 Change to 2005 Citizen Ad Hoc Recommendation Boeckh Index $12981 $15422 Updated to projected SPI schedule (G Beck) Match % - State 5586% 5571% Updated to current SPI schedule Match % - District 4414% 4429% Computed District Average AV Single Family $218,805 $237,281 Updated from March 2006 King County Dept of Assessments data Multi -Family $55,264 $57,530 Updated from March 2006 King County Dept of Assessments data using weighted average Debt Sery Tax Rate $249 $2 39 Current Fiscal Year GO Bond Int Rate 463% 439% Current Rate (Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-06) Section VIII Appendices Appendix A 1 - Updated enrollment projections from October 1, 2005 Appendix A 2 - Updates enrollment projections with anticipated buildout schedule Appendix A 3 - Student Generation Survey Auhum School Distnct No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS The Auburn School District uses a modified cohort survival model to project future enrollment for all of the District's operations Table 11 1 is an extract from the comprehensive projection model found In Appendix A 2 titled "CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections" This Table shows the anticipated enrollment for the next six years based on the previous 13 year history of the District under the assumptions set forth in the comprehensive projections, Appendix A 1, and the projection for additional students generated from the Lakeland South and Lea Hill areas as shown in Appendix A 2 TABLE ASD ENROLLMENT 2006-2007 11.1 PROJECTIONS Oct 2005 2009-2010 2010-2011 ACTUAL PROJ PROD PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 KDG 955 966 984 1005 1030 1055 1072 1 963 1017 1037 1058 1085 1110 1129 2 953 979 1041 1063 1090 1115 1134 3 1002 986 1011 1076 1104 1130 1149 4 939 1017 1010 1038 1109 1136 1156 5 1065 959 1047 1043 1077 1148 1168 K-5 5887 5924 6130 6284 6495 6695 6807 6 1004 1086 989 1080 1082 1115 1178 7 1028 1032 1123 1030 1126 1127 1152 8 1137 1042 1056 1150 1062 1157 1150 6-8 3169 3160 3168 3259 3269 3398 3479 9 1379 1425 1346 1369 1477 1397 1489 10 1383 1310 1366 1286 1313 1415 1321 11 1182 1301 1236 1291 1213 1234 1324 12 1088 1092 1218 1153 1211 1129 1139 9-12 5032 5128 5165 5099 5214 5174 5273 TOTALS 14088 14212 14463 14642 14978 15268 15559 GRADES K-12 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 K-5 w/K @ 112 5410 5441 5638 5781 5980 6168 6271 6-8 3169 3160 3168 3259 3269 3398 3479 9-12 5032 5128 5165 5099 5214 5174 5273 K-12 w/K 91112 13611 13730 13971 14140 14463 14740 15023 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 111 I I I I I t I I I i I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Aubum School Distnct No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2005 through 2012 STANDARD OF SERVICE The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, Pierce County, the City of Aubum and the City of Kent indicate that each school district must establish a "Standard of Service" in order to ascertain the overall capacity to house its projected student population The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage "capacity* guidelines for computing state funding support The fundamental purpose of the SPI guidelines is to provide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching funds for school construction projects By default these guidelines have been used to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population The SPI guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, facility configurations, emerging educational reform, or the dynamics of each student's educational program The Auburn School Disinct Standard of Service addresses those local considerations that require space in excess of the SPI guidelines The effect on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation pattern Condthons that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without accompanying computations, OV&WEW The Auburn School District operates twelve elementary schools housing 5,887 students in grades K through 5 The 905 of the 955 Kindergarten students attend 1/2 days throughout the year Grades 1 through 5, plus 25 kindergartners, attend on a full day basis When converted to a full time equivalence the K-5 enrollment is 5,435 Four middle schools house 3,169 students in grades 6 through 8 The District operates three comprehensive senior high schools and one alternative high school housing 5,032 students in grades 9 through 12 The District opened the fourth high school In the fall of 2005 CLASS SIZE The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the student population Class sizes are subject to collective bargaining Changes to class size agreements can have significant Impact on available space The current pupil/teacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 26 5 students per teacher Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 26 5 students per room at grades K - 5 At grades 6 -12 the limit is set at 30 pupils per room The SPI space allocation for each grade articulation level, less the computed reduction for the Auburn School District Standard of Service, determines the District's capacity to house projected pupil populations These reductions are shown below by grade articulation level ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING AND BEHAVIOR AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses nine classrooms to provide for 80 students The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPI space guidelines No loss of capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to total elementary population Auburn School Distract No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 STANDARD OF SERVICE SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities Fifteen standard classrooms are required to house this program The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space guidelines by ten standard classrooms The loss of capacity is expected as growth in program is larger than the total elementary population Loss of Permanent Capacity 11 rooms @ 26 5 each = (292) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (292) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Aubum School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the elementary level One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room Q 26 5 each = (27) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (27) HEAD START The Auburn School District operates a Head Start program for approximately 118 youngsters in six sections of 1/2 day in length The program is housed at Evergreen Heights Elementary School and utilizes three standard elementary classrooms and auxiliary office space The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms ® 26 5 each = (80) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (80) EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a pre-school program for young children with disabilities below age five This program is housed at nine different elementary schools and currently uses nine standard classrooms The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI, space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 9 rooms c@ 26 5 each = (239) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (239) 10 Aubum School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2806 through 2012 STANDARD OF SERVICE READING LABS The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional language arts instruction These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces if available in each elementary school Four elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available, thus they are housed in a standard classroom The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 26.5 each = (106) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (106) MUSIC ROOMS The district elementary music programs require one acoustically modified classroom at each elementary school for music instruction The housing requirements are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 13 rooms @ 26 5 each = (345) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (345) ENGLISH ASA SECOND LANGUAGE PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the elementary school level for students learning English as a second language This program requires twelve standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 13 rooms @ 26.5 each = (345) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (345) SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for nine highly impacted elementary schools This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade level and do not receive other services This program requires nine standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 9 rooms @ 26 5 each = (239) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (239) ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a learning specialist program to increase literacy skills for first and second graders This program model has been created from the 1-728 funds and currently has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms, as well as pulling out students into designated classrooms The district is utilizing classrooms at all twelve elementary schools Loss of Permanent Capacity 13 rooms @ 26 5 each = (345) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (345) 11 Aubum School Distnct No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2DD8 through 2012 STANDARD OF SERVICE MIDDLE SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates two structured learning classrooms at the middle school level for students with moderate disabilities One developmentally disabled classroom for students with profound disabilities The housing requirements for this program are provided in the SPI space allocations ACCESS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District provides a transition program for students with behavioral disorders The program is housed atone of the middle schools and uses one classroom The housing requirements for this program are provided in the SPI space allocations. SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level. This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific disabilities Three classrooms per school (twelve total) are required to provide for approximately 300 students The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the SPI space guidelines MIDDLE SCHOOL COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates a minimum of one computer lab at each middle school This program utilizes a standard classroom per middle school The housing requirements for this program are not provided for In the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for students learning English as a second language This program requires four standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that Includes elective options in special interest areas Facilities to accommodate special Interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations SPI Report #3 dated 11/03/05 identifies 151 teaching stations available in the mid-level facilities The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each = (240) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (240) 12 Auburn School Distinct No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2012 STANDARD OF SERVICE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS SENIOR HIGH COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates two computer tabs at each of the senior high schools This program utilizes two standard classrooms at comprehensive high schools and one at West Auburn The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 30 each = (210) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (210) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at both comprehensive high schools for students learning English as a second language This program requires five standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 30 each = (150) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (150) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates three structured leaming center classrooms for 40 students with moderate to severe disabilities The housing requirements for this program are provided in the SPI space guidelines SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities The current senior high school program requires sixteen classrooms to provide for approximately 420 students The SPI space guidelines provide for one of the sixteen teaching stations Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @ 30 each = (450) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (450) PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center The SPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity This space was not intended for nor is it usable for classroom instruction It was constructed to provide a community center for the performing arts Using SPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet computes to 208 unhoused students or 8 33 classrooms Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 33 rooms @ 30 each = (250) 13 Auburn School Dlstnct No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 STANDARD OF SERVICE ROOM UTIL/ZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that Includes numerous elective options in special Interest areas Facilities to accommodate special Interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations SPI Report #3 dated 11/03/05 Identifies 148 teaching stations available In the senior high facilities The utilization pattern results In a loss of approximately 15 teaching stations Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @ 30 each = (450) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (450) STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS ELEMENTARY Loss of Permanent Capacity = (2,014) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (2,014) MIDDLE SCHOOL Loss of Permanent Capacity = (480) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (480) SENIOR HIGH Loss of Permanent Capacity = (1,510) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,510) TOTAL Loss of Permanent Capacity = (4,004) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (4,004) 14 Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2012 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES Table IV. I shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their CIPSI rated capacities. Table IV.2 shows the number and location of each portable unit by school. The district uses relocatable facilities to I . provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school populations that would otherwise require continual redistnettng. 2. make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique student needs, and 3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on existing physical plants. Core facilities (i.e. gymnasiums, restrooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc.) are not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable classrooms. Table PemianentFacilities IV.I @ OSPI Rate Capacity (November 2005) District School Facilities Building Capacity Acres Address Elements Schools Washington Elementary 492 5.40 20 E Street Northeast Auburn WA 98002 Terminal Park Elementary 401 670 1101 D Street Southeast Auburn WA 98002 Dick Scobee Elementary 550 1050 1031 14th Street Northeast,Auburn WA 98002 Pioneer Elementary 415 930 2301 M Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Chinook Elementary 485 875 3502 Auburn Way South Auburn WA, 98092 Lea Hill Elementary 459 10.00 30908 124th Avenue Southeast Auburn WA 98092 Gddo Rey Elementary 531 1000 1005 37th Street Southeast,Auburn WA 98002 Evergreen Hei is Elem 456 8.09 5602 South 316th Auburn WA 98001 AI ac Elementary 494 10.60 310 Milwaukee Boulevard North Pacific WA 98047 Lake View Elementary 595 1640 16401 Southeast 318th Street Auburn WA 98092 Hazelwood Elementary 578 1267 11815 Southeast 304th Street,Auburn WA 98092 Ilalko Elementary 585 1200 301 Oravetz Place Southeast Auburn WA 98092 Lakeland Hills Elementary 585 1200 1020 Evergreen Way SE, Auburn WA,98092 ELEM CAPACITY 6,626 Middle Schools Cascade Middle School 836 1730 1015 24th Street Northeast,Auburn WA 98002 Olympic Middle School 898 1740 1825 K Street Southeast, Auburn WA 98002 Rainier Middle School 849 2633 30620 116th Avenue Southeast,Auburn WA 98092 Mt. Baker Middle School 845 3088 620 37th Street Southeast Auburn WA, 98002 MS CAPACITY 3,428 Senior Hieh Schools West Auburn High School 231 5 10 401 West Main Street Auburn WA 98001 Auburn Senior High 2,237 1960 800 Fourth Street Northeast,Auburn WA, 98002 Auburn Riverside HS 1,388 33 00 5010ravetz Road,Auburn WA 98092 Auburn Mountainview HS 1,431 4000 28900 124 Ave SE AuburnWA 98092 SH CAPACITY 5,287 TOTAL CAPACITY 15,341 16 Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES TABLE TEMPORARYJRELOCATASLE 2006-07 IV.2 FACILITIES INVENTORY I 2009-10 2010-11 March 2006 Cascade Bernentary Location 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2010-11 Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Terminal Park 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Dick Scobee 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Pioneer 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Chinook 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Lea Hill 5 5 5 2 2 2 2 Gildo Rey 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Evergreen Heights 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 Alpac 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Lake View 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Hazelwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ilalko 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 Lakeland Hills Elementary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 33 33 33 30 30 30 30 TOTAL CAPACITY 875 875 875 795 795 795 795 Middle School Location 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2010-11 Cascade 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 Olympic 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 Rainier 5 5 5 8 8 8 8 Mt Baker 4 4 6 8 6 6 6 TOTAL UNITS 9 9 13 18 18 18 18 TOTAL CAPACITY 270 270 390 540 540 540 540 Sr High School Location 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 West Auburn 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 Auburn 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Auburn Riverside 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Auburn Mountainview 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 22 22 23 23 23 23 23 TOTAL CAPACITY 660 660 690 690 690 690 690 17 Auburn School Distncl No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 PUPIL CAPACITY While the Auburn School District uses the SPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from which to determine space needs, the District's educational program requires more space than that provided for under the formula This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in Section III, Standard of Service The District's capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional space to house its programs Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new unfunded facilities The combined effect of these adjustments is shown on Line B in Tables V 1 and V 2 below Table V 1 shows the Drstict's capacity with relocatable units included and Table V 2 without these units Table V.1 Capacity 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 1 2008-09 2009-10 1 2010-11 2011-12 WITH relocatabies A SPI Capacity 14,817 14,817 15,367 15,917 15,917 16,667 16,667 A 1 SPI Capacity -New Elem 550 550 A 2 SPI Capacity- New MS 750 B Capacity Adjustments 2093 2,199 2,1702,099 4124 2,099 2099 2,099 12,724 13,168 13,747 13,818 14,568 14,568 14,568 C Net Capacity D ASD Enrollment 14,088 14,212 14,463 14,642 14,978 15,268 15,559 E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (1,364) (1,045) (718) (824) (410) (700) (991) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Include Relocatable 1,805 1,805 1,955 2,025 2,025 2,025 2,025 Exclude SOS 12 3,898 4,004 4,124 (4,124) 4,124 4,124 4,124 Total Adjustments (2,093) (2,199) (2,170) (2,099) (2,099) (2,099) (2,099) Table V.2 Capacity WITHOUT relocatablee 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 A SPI Capacity 14,817 14,817 15,367 15,917 15,917 16,667 16,667 A 1 SPI Capacity -New Elem 550 550 A 2 SPI Capacity- New MS 750 B Capacity Adjustments 3,898 4,004 4,124 4124 4,124 4,124 4,124 10,919 11,363 11,793 11,793 12,543 12,543 12,543 C. Net Capacity D ASD Enrollment 14,088 14,212 14,463 14,642 14,976 15,268 15,559 E. ASD Surp/us/Deficlt (3,169) (2,849) (2,670) (2,849) (2,435) (2,725) (3,016) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Exclude SOS 12 3 898 (4,004) 4,124 (4,124) 4,124 4124 4,124 Tota/Adjustments (3,898) (4,004) (4,124) (4,124) (4,124) (4,124) (4,124) 1/ New facilities shown in 2009-10 are not funded under the current Capital Facilities Plan a/ The Standard of Service represents 24 69% of SPI capacity When new facilities are added the Standard of Service computations are decreased to 20 26% of SPI capacity 31 Students beyond the capacity are accomodated in nonclassroom spaces (commons, library, theater) 19 Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974 with the formation of a community wide citizens committee. The result of this committee's work was published in the document tilled 'Guidelinesfor Development' In 1985 the Board formed a second Ad Hoc citizens committee to pick up from the work of the first and address the needs of the District for subsequent years The work of this committee was published in the document titled 'Directions for the Nineties ' In 1995 the Board commissioned a third Ad Hoc citizens committee to make recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and physical facilities The committee recommendations are published in the document titled 'Education Into The Twenty -First Century - - A Community Involved.' The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop plans for the implementation, funding, and deployment of technology throughout the District's programs. The 1996 Bond proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate technological applications. The 1998 Capital Levy provided funding to further deploy technology at a level sufficient to support program requirements in every classroom and department. In 2005 a replacement technology levy was approved to continue to support technology across all facets of the District's teaching, learning and operations. In addition to the technology needs of the District the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District must prepare for continued student enrollment growth As stated in their report, "the District must pursue an appropnate high school site as soon as possible." The Ad Hoc recommendation included commentary that the financing should be tuned to maintain consistent rates of assessment A proposition was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that is providing $8,000,000 over six years to address some of the technology needs of the District, and $5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire school sites. During the 1997-98 school year a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Diermger School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population that will come from an area that includes a large development known as Lakeland South Lakeland South is immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the Auburn School District. On June 16, 1998 the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Dieringer Boards of Directors. On June 22, 1998 the Auburn School Board adopted Resolution No. 933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 23, 1998 the Dieringer School Board adopted a companion Resolution No 24-97-98 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from Dieringer to Auburn containing most of the Lakeland South development and certain other undeveloped properties. Development in this area is progressing at an aggressive rate In April of 2002, the Board formed a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two items and make recommendations to the board in the Fall of 2002. a A review of the conclusion and recommendations of 1985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees related to accommodating high school enrollment growth. This includes the review of possible financing plans for new facilities. b. Develop recommendations for accommodating high school enrollment growth for the next 10 years if a new senior high school is not built. This committee recommended the board place the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in February 2003. The February election approved the new high school at 68 71% yes votes The school opened in the Fall of 2005. In the Fall of 2003 the school board directed the administration to begin the planning and design for Elementary #13 and Elementary #14. In the Fall of 2004, the Auburn School Board passed resolution #1054 to place on the ballot in February 2005 two elementary schools The voters approved the ballot measure in February of 2005 at 64.72% Elementary #13 is under construction in the Lakeland area on a 12 acre site and 21 1/ Au bum School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2006 through 2012 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN is scheduled to open in the Fall of 2006. Elementary #14 is currently in bid process and construction is scheduled to begin in Spring of 2006 and to open in the Fall of 2007. The school will be constructed on a 10 acre site the district owns in the Lea Hill area. In the 2004-05 school year, the Board convened a sixth Citizen's Ad Hoc committee to again study, and make recommendations about the future impacts in the District. One of the areas of study was the need for New Facilities and Modernization. The committee made a number of recommendations including school size, the need for a new middle school, and to begin a capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities based upon criterion. The committee also recommended that the District have Middle School #5 on-line by Fall of 2009. The District is projecting 1470 additional students within the six year period including the Lakeland and Lea Hill areas. This increase in student population will require the construction of two new elementary schools, and the acquisition of a new middle school site and construction of a middle school during the six year window. Based upon the District's capacity data and enrollment projections, as well as the student generation data included in Appendix A 3, the District has determined that approximately eighty-one percent of the capacity improvements are necessary to serve the students generated from new development, with the remaining additional capacity required to address existing need. The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years. The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population 2005-12 Capital Construction Plan March 2006 Funded Projected Fund Project Timelines Project as of Cost Source 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 Mar -06 All Facilities - 2006 Technology Yes $12,000,000 6 Year XX XX XX XX XX XX Modernization Cap Levy Impact Portables Yes $700,000 Fees XX XX XX XX Property Purchase Bond New Middle School Yes $5,000,000 Impact XX XX Fees Bond Elementary#13 Yes $16,900,000 Impact XX XX Fees const open Bond Elementary #14 Yes $18,600,000 Impact XX XX XX Fees plan const open Middle School #5 No $30,000,000 XX XX XX XX Ian const const open Bond New Sr High Yes $58,500,000 Impact XX Fees open It These funds may be secured through local bond issues, sale of real property, impact fees, and state matching funds The District cumently is not eligible for state assistance at the elementary school level 22 3�I h of 6 ! §I @ g2;la I ®| | | | 2 | L &|8 8 ai E` | mm | p \n=q tam V11 | | g | �WmSSq �»+t■!@�.�__d afiaftme $ ! 92!%»«q xi I « R2 I_eN Bff«flaa &@t a 9 aM IA C?U— | m�■a#f I q -r| | A | m - Ms 8m $|+ | «*g I & ¢ta7fq § q` | | ,q I E41 q B #| | | mmf,e&m �t�ga&w § 2�� ka 6&kd A 0 Mi I Q LI \ � ■| | g R| S0)9 ca 5141 72 h!F 8 II r Q= |$ g@A I | | m| | | || Am§ @m 0 to a@! 2 t E 6 a [■| | | | LH U BL] | #! mg | ■ &| | M G;;§QA GQ $m $ �4+� « I !t R I | m! E| I || | | |! ■E! m I ■ * <; R& 2 I | | | ■;a Uq§ a■! L-4 1 §, L4 I I 1 «a I« a .51 §!■ q � &» * m |�� !!e R Oma I rmS!■mem! kg: w&@ 1 o w& r a t -@!»a P m* 21; Yr I IS iIaSO r[1 C r a 0 ... v ap �No; p • ,r• Q a1Y1�N IA —M F, f m 'M„ ISI I " I I I 1 C2� lil, I_ as I�IQmI.,L: mw cq Sia �x�� m� LU NISI I I I I I I Is 1�NmQ�PIMi N N Iwxlo�rn N cQ °' ��s so I=ol I"I I ILa�Ag I I I W I i0 w 41 C n O m D !rc N G N I O� IL !Cla Or m rn of I I LL I rr m T C Z 05 46 y v_i t T rn m jy Oj Y ' c L• 4L u LL IA tq to � r� '� c `c I ^ N •.I �I� � � �Iml aai uai�0a. LLLL iia x€�� I .- 6 re _ _ g s I� n� <0 a. y Sc 42n m ? ?r m R c I�..IQ 2Iz e R R. TI us iI W I_m� a Q�Q€E LL��� �41U1@$I'2pa;M I Ia m m sm Amo•,_, EL *9 `" �` 1=1" .� I I I Auburn School District No 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2006 through 2012 Section VIII Appendix Appendix A 1 - Student Enrollment Projections Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections Appendix A 3 - Student Generation Survey Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections FOR BACKGROUND INFORMATION PURPOSES Aubum School District 4408 Student Enrollment Projections October 2005 Introduction The projective techniques give some consideration to historical and current data as a basis for forecasting the future. In addition, the `projector' must make certain assumptions about the operant variables within the data being used These assumptions are "judgmental" by definition Forecasting can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future, or from the known to the unknown. The attached tabular data reviews the history of student enrolhnent, sets out some quantitative assumptions, and provides projections based on these numerical factors. The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, psychological, economic, and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection. The logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today, and will be in the future. It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over thirteen years and six years respectively. The results provide a trend, which reflects a long (13 -year) and a short (6 -year) base from which to extrapolate. Two methods of estimating the number of kindergarten students have been used. The fust uses the average increase or decrease over the past 13 and 6 -year time frame and adds it to each succeeding year The second derives what the average percentage Auburn kindergartners have been of the live births in King County for the past 5 years and uses this to project the subsequent four years. The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact. This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections. Monitoring deviation is critical to the viability and credibility of the projections derived by these techniques. Tables Table 1— Thirteen Year History of October 1 Enrollments — page 31 The data shown in this table is the baseline information used to project future enrollment. This data shows the past record of enrollment in the district on October 1 of each year. Table 2 — Historical Factors Used in Protections - page 32 This table shows the three basic factors derived from the data in Table 1. These factors have been used in the subsequent projections. The three factors are 1. Factor 1 — Average Pupil Change Between Grade Levels This factor is sometimes referred to as the "holding power" or "cohort survival." It is a measure of the number of pupils gained or lost as they move from one grade level to the next. 29 2. Factor 2 - Average Pupil Change by Grade Level This factor is the average change at each grade level over the 13 or 6 -year period. 3. Factor 3 — Auburn School District Kindergarten Enrollment as a Function of King County Live Births. This factor calculates what percent each kindergarten class was of the King County live births in the 5 previous years. From this information has been extrapolated the kindergarten pupils expected for the next 4 years Table 3 — Projection Models — pages 33-41 This set of tables utilizes the above mentioned variables and generates several projections. The models are explained briefly below ❑ Table 3.13 (pg 33) — shows a projection based on the 13 -year average gain in kindergarten (Factor 2) and the 13 -year average change between grade levels (Factor 1). The data is shown for the district as a whole. ❑ Table 3.6 (pg 33) — shows a projection using the same scheme as Table 3.13 except it shortens the historical to only the most recent 6 years. ❑ Table 3.13A and 3.6A (pg 34) — uses the same factors above except Factor 3 is substituted for Factor 2. The kindergarten rates are derived from the King County live births instead of the average gain. ❑ Tables 3E.13, 3E.6, 3E. 13A, 3E.6A (pg 35)—breaks out the K-5 grades from the district projection Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Tables 3MS.13, 3MS.6, 3MS.I3A, 3MS 6A (pg 36) — breaks out the 6-8 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Tables 3SH. 13, 3SH.6, 3SH.13A, 3SH.6A (pg 37) —breaks out the 9-12 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Table 4 (pg 38) — Collects the four projection models by grade group for ease of comparison. ❑ Table 5 (pgs 3941) — shows how well each projection model performed when compared with actual enrollments Data is provided in both number and percent formats for the past 13 years. 30 N61— w.... N .w M YY O !. O m N a I!gl* Js _I 1 I._ � f. .- m N 0 Q o 1* N MI I I I II -In I! I I 1`I1•�I I ,Y W W " Y VI " " JJ("III (^y Q^ A IOIiY ]t QI � � N Z St M M St mNIN OI I I IN I F- IC�I(y o d Q� {Q � V IZI I I W I I I.AI1N 9 a FF s 0 r N O �J r O LV J A co I� CD i0 W t`J m w.r" a; m A m m N r m !D I N e9 7� N 1� P) N It i 91 Irl* Ie VIA I I 4! N b m !n N n . MI IOIN l2 . ri !'a te v i O N h ;b �I�I ..I I4 Ii'I IN en 3 a N M M 2 WN g --- %I J w I9I9 O O OAO OINI� 1X11 `+I 1-0 45 CR ACd m OT OIO OiN _ I II I I ca I� yah Ica in O)jai a ii as Ci WINi -'I Iik Iil IRS N m lYl a !w[1 N v 1Y1I CC, {Y Iml ImI*_151 1 I_�. __ ,� � L I2S 101w r . .. ... ... ... ... ... � e� ...I`IN ••I� �I I V Iy, til h f0 1'! Y h N e- t9 Y tV I ml o 11 J!�- E 0?1 1._ I 1 0 t: Inst M1Ndmn chiNtD IAOffiNI_18.T-I PI 1 v 1 ...IN WNM v +OTS .N.;lSI 1-5 1 1 m 1� 11 11 1 11 �1 I 1 Irn to m Q n v iti o io g N to rn1-=1 11 m1s m : S 2 8 A m S a� I I"I 116 .10z- i1 i IT QIU M b m to !O m m w W N �:I I�-La_a' _ 1 L F — — 0 m Q F--],,. T— f 1�F-1 i. IW<�IeY!xx xxxeteu? feet: xuxt LI*kR x -sl* -m 0-Mem— s,Ti Y7 a7 �/ff YYff f f ff afaf f f Ntomft7 en nl++li lf'�I<4Q4U,I lm �1 wf LOUwl I� TL" \ Im v V YL % W V n V \V W W YJ W W. t V / �'W Y/ r V !` W V V \ I V W ('I r% (al b I�COI7 JK101PfPlnl9�wcdP ad C6cd0 O/r em 19rNON—NNtV NrN NA Q J I:. LLIK JIm A M T n N M+ m m A m T n N M s M M A M T n N N/ f N f0 n CO M O —H2 I(�Nj Iy WI'r pn�� F F- n i5 m id a3 ab ib pM w a m iS bi bi di di d M 5 5 5 o 0 o 0 00 o o 0- I][ =1 E SIN 4 n n aND OJ ap m Q$ 8 n n h0 O N m Q m f f m T s <R R N ww h Al 1b; `�---a I� 1 Plat 6Zi rna ��ZS6Naa'aiiZ PSa4Z3Bi6=i;ZZ16PiaZkm63; 15 B;Z�19 II .....__..__....______________.._.__.,.--- _ ____.i0 IO J SIN N N N N N N N N N N ------ m mW m- T 01 NNN NNN NN— IO 11 I, ILC Iv W >.I, 9 Ilb ! hI�ITIoINININI�I�I41�INlal� J I h i ImIrIWI�I�IOI�ITI�I� hl�l�.(N I I1� ISI I I I I I Iz r I h 1co1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I> I I_ II# I51_I. 1.1 I _ ._1. I_i_IOlrl� I Ifs 1a1„I_L1, 1..Ll- 1,L1� 101,11,1 I 1t IIb 10 . sl fb 101 I I I I I I I I I I I I Is la lIc 1 1^ of 11 I 1I° I t$ 119- 1 I't I is ..1 It III, A IMI'-IMIMCI',INImill b TNI 10' I INI�I�IMI�I° INI+IMI+ImI+IAIb �l ILL ll<p rI 1a. ISI I I I I I I I I I I I I Ib "I IM .,,II7i _I�1 I_•I_I_I_I.nI. I_I I�f�Irl$i� wI IR .114IvI_In,I IrI.wI. 1� I_I IOI�INI; TI r IF P1 eL-7 L'I�I�I�IaaITI�I�I ILLS 1_ 1711 Ill 111111111291 9 h O .i I I --- - --I�Io I Ia_I���--------FI0�I In^°IeT m�cM,!Rmrp�RIIm1f-1 ImS�NM1;0 0 - co M co9 AAR!D iNf_l 9 19'1 s9�F���� �N i 1x N1 H H 1 H H{ I�al�boaaz�xsa�N�oLl�s<{ I�alaois������m�al�lYl la'Mlw-w-�im---.-.-----�l-- la-INNNa��m�00�I�IN=1 0XQ00�mMl�ld _I u uV I I-1 u- I I0-I;z oo�0000 ;ioblwi�) I0-1;:: o5NNoaSi6;lJ-I°SI d •- �- o d------ o a^ N olio �I uF I 1- I u I IoalM— mN2mm 5�mTO 9- m �61_ N�m���NmImI�NI r u u_ I I u u I VsmMl1A _I 1 00 RIly xE SR VVICJ 19 .ill I I IV I loo- I I I- I M`ytlo'901-AQ2Z9V+R; Wc5lZ_I IQM1la"Nq wevSI•r„mrm�sRl�l?�_I It SILL I 1�1= I r>t'_l I I�I I IrRMWLSl'eD12 9? mmmllal331 WZl!') Nlef2rg9"co ;OZmmm1-51331 r I 1 Islla I I• Is _f I�^I 91�-- -_ -•----e�Naa I I�ml 91� _ _- -•_--_e�a�Gd I e 0 Z m Q 172as1 mmm,,ll l 172 07NM�,11 I I�mlm�ml l I Uml LI�I I I u u I u u I H H1 I H H I I�ul aoo����l 1 i IEE ,1 3ss:�s�al I Ia�1 �-- . -- - - - I I I Ia�i Io r1 meL' s�mml I 1 10-1 m�<0w co aw l I 10 d� g� aa$ol I I a' N O O M N [Ow -N & I -'NLL!'b�1a Vail l l O O O O O v t+1 1 --1 1--1 1 C- I a a a.11 )C! 0N0m IA�Iaa) In, �Ia)r�hInA9StM�R Pq 1- I uv I F LF I _ 1 2-4 d- FloammmmE $i O NQ Olml�h� I _lo X10 n m Nn NmnIn)�1 1 9" u— I 1 1" u— I 1-I0elT�x�x°'�'NOMS�II��I I =10 el�m'sor������l�lmml H2 SAI I 1310o1Omo�mQ�Nm�®mmlNl� �l I�IoQleatnef rmm���„ml�l I Ia�ro6NLQm sS'mmml.wwwl i00 1�w10�ITn!s9mamm�mmml�lc�31 la ila I I I� : I ISAIZ 1 1 1= =1 1��1 91..-- __ -•----o►Naa I IMaI 91S?__.__.__. __O�Naa I w A 4 0 6mL.,emovm6b' I Ro+ -,mal,6t I LW1 I I 1 bml I I I P --I- --"--I r I r-'L'---.-rr I F r-I I I k0 -I -��Rvm ARM_I 1�mbtsRv2xnLEJ roml I 1 1 la ml I I u u- 1 u Lr 1 u u I u u i iso ooVL6 I v-9""'""'MF"-I vK'i I I I v � I I I H H I H1 H I H H I H H I ^�baaasron"•I p?IP557— ���I ��l I I I I�ml L6 I I f ^f -----no I P- -r --- ` rio I I ^I I rb N�g9ni ;3,rh;!ps8 �;9 1 13 1 OaII I 0 1 X311 I I --I u Il�—I uI 4--I u I I --I u 1 W,aKoa3 o82r-r I R rVL005Prr I V?1 g RI l I 'N► sOOI I r71 ri- I [-1 rl- I r-1 h I r-1 h I r'I as$baiII I fa. -I 1��1_ANVA�b6� I 6-LmNm. -L6 1 6-1 _ ____,nl 11 6-1 1 1 r- -1 -_---t r I r--1- -----wr I ri ---i i I ri----i i 13�-2In -mslsle_l 13�-%owV-xs<hK_1 0s6 h;K 1 006 d12K_I u L.1�1 u I.—I J u- I!I u- I 1 I-� w I i----1 I --I 1 f" Lf" II A" u" I I LQM=fx25'FrRI",L? �iV x4YI�F7YI >LoB�N"xT°'� X11 be mNx4p l��,l f. ' ILLn-1 Ipp ht -A IA�Cc 1 -o�L?? 1 II L 111 is ll� II I I {I pp�� �H (r�<�1..7�I^O�C �,On I^14A 1�0[La1V QL7l�aSY. N.%NIoD.{'i �N ��oec�4���I�i�13 o���NNX��i �I of 19IlFg I I4V��F I,� Iy�..:E-!�i``^ L-1-yll� IE -1 I AU- �u��"xx ALr k ALJ LJm n 'Eli( 1 LlE. n ti aIU LJ, n 1 he Ala I LK 1 D -al 9t2__.__...I~IL I F I �I kl r 1 "I kl r"I °I kl Ir, I "I kl I A e 6 01- 0101at 1 1-2 VIM n MIM1e I la -11 ' 1"10 I la -I- - Ill I IR IIm NO 2flek 1 la VINO A _1 la mt MI I I la VI I I I u uv I u u 1 u u I u u I I W ml Wd' I BW IS I 91 1 1 I(51 I I II� =n I-- -1 H I I --I H I F--1 H I l--1 H 1 Ia�1aaa1MI..m1 1,&0,1 �,a:W�NI I1rX10O01916`°I laIlao01n1, I -1-Ie 1 11 u,L N _1.,L 1 11 J, - AJ* _1 1, wl- _ _.1-.IaR _1 IMI I 16- 11 - 111= vl la �1� 101---] 10 aIG n �MIVV 1 1'0 SIM Q18M MI 1IT V ^Ig1m -I to pie QIWoim Ni l I ---I u l 1--1 u- I u` I ►� a10 O ol`�Ir gl Iz alb _ 01m1-' M IW al0 O olrl- �I Im NIO - 0 0NI N �I Q I O C G M N a ,I-- IIMIO Q' 1 O O N M Ia. II� IIMI1 "I 0 0 0 m la �I� 0 NI �- O O N M a �I� M r vi h -I- M JAI* I I-2 -INN 11-1* 1 Iz, III M UJA 1 1-7 -IN N AI_Ile I la 'I� ' �IMI� I la -11 _1�1N I Ia "II ' 'I"II I Ia -1, ` -IMIN I 1'0 SIS �INOI� �I 100 MIM m Ilel la plg a INOI� �I I'0 �I� m slll J uv I _., ._l—! L1 I ._...LJ UJ I u" I i 16 9MW �PE ml I'' ,. la In ml, �I 1 rlo gli! Io1&2 w I '_I( 91*IDIS 01 1 lJ 1 19 $L_._J LI I 115) 16 e1:n S NWl0 WI 18 Io _e INO 8 M11V5 01 113 alo elm 2T r1U16 MI 15 C5 elm � �Ir14 41 l� �1 I i Iv 11!3 1:i I I I I ISd ;I I I I" IIS �I I I I" I rlo el;:, F1 ISS .Io elm m <I""<I_- N1 Irl Flo ole NII� F1 1?( 31, elm :1:1� �1 to vF I I I- I Ia M I 1 1_ I It AF I I I_ 1 16 11- 1 1 I_ I M 4b �_SIg N �MIs10 31 1-2 tiles C9 N -nImlO ra1 17;vs CS N MIT 01 U a1Ig N Mlm10 01 I3 dS1< I I I9 A IfI&I< I I I A WAR I 1 1 E_ �M Is a] I I I I A _I9Ia I In- y1 91_ _ ...1910 I IM "I s1_ _ _1910 I I� !I 91_ _ _1910 1 Ir "� IQ>I I lr A "I IDI I E MI WI IDI I I,- MI "I IDI I a 0 12 WIC, r '0101st I 1? Wiv 40 e O)Iml* 1 12 MIM m W nlNlt° ..I 1� ChIm N m 06-M J 10- -Ir r r -MO I fa- -1- - � !1"110 1 Ia. `1- - 11 10- 1 Id -1- - la SIM W ;IIRI*I _ I la lwIw� A !R vIZI1* _ I la --DI� TIT -I la °�IT �lol* I Is zl� %ffl'1� �I toII-IR�ISI si I� '-I'0N m I IN _i Id -7 N AIT �i 1—I H I F -- l H I H H_ I 1---i H_ I I& �sI r rl�fm NI IS I ?� al�l� �I Ia �f� �lelm NI I� la Flo �I�I� �I la rI m mI IS J Ia 10 1;! 1) I la �Im m �ImIT �I l --I- I I— I I. -I" I I_. -J I. -j 1 I� C- 19 N o -5Iplo of Ia a1'T A a 'IOIm �I Iwo alm N o �IAI0 0I I� a1`s M s rIoIW �! I -I _ I 1-1 ri _ I r" ri _ I �- m o r R tCj a �Ir rlalo Q r< N N W W o a -I� r I<I� I ¢ r m r iV O l� p Id r1r r rlala NI -<' N O W p Id .-Ir r --I•Ir "I 1, �l k 11. ..Tale -1 I, 'L .1_k �l Ia rIr _ r r1`I� -1 Id r1r r r 'MQ -I Id rlr r r .-lely VI Id .-Ir � r .-rlm "1 In'IA 12IT-1 l1A R R s1;114 <I 1a ?1;! pi M� -.HS 13 PIP R R dlx14 <l � r I LJ' II_J U I. _1J LJ" I .^L_ 1 U I Io 9 1 s r v OI10 1 16 6S1! N WI -r!!? N1 do FIs S Y 0ItIS6 mII _Io 91� F -MIII I LJ "- I IJ LI" I fl. -___I U' It I" 1 -I I I to elo S �ImIN �1 .Io elm NIMI� Nt Flo e14 O WIIN SII 310 elm fa silt I I Iv 10 I:9 I 11" 10 wI I 11" 110 +I 1 1 1" 1 Int ffifo> el-" 9 mlmlr elm -a < olmlWK AI NIO, "el'N m mlmlm .110 3100 eIN r' S 81SIm J 11 hl` 1 1 1' tt::F I I I' [it IF I I I' I It IVA bth I0� m mlNMlO*w 'Ow4i nU 1m� m m -WN10-O'u IV nl�=l I, m m 21%415 C'DwIIII ;,13 N1� m m 21PI15 6WI I a11a t I M I Il -404 I I I - At _41a I I Il A Illb SIR I I I? �rI N19100 M� Tl 91.., o - I4 �-I 91_ G r NlVla ll; 1-31 611_ o r Nlv'ld" I IWI F "1 Ul 161 1� �51 "l Ic6I II" "I "l 1061 1 A P r 0 d N W LL IL z w J Lr z F - Z Li 7 H L.. G 1:2a,[ -A I 1.2 I 12 l I�-WImmN�l bON I 10- .-I .- I 0.O 10- -0min I IO �Is n I IO min a N nI to I IO m1� FI 1 I -I 1 u I I-1 I I-1 I I� SIE nIN N I I° :IN e 1 10 nim a NI la mIN 1 H I H I H I H I H I la �1W a I la �I� I Ia �I� ml Ia alm a g1 IE OIa I I� I k 1 1, k I-. m110 v I m1 mi_ . 01_ r .n NI ml„ n. n.i I0. -F - I Im .-Im m I I0. -Im M "I Im 'I" n a ml Im -1-� : I 13 rvIv� N I IO 7 1 I to 7I�! o �I IO I� ml IO �I� 1 1-1 I I_---1 1-771 1 I-771 SIM MI la -la : a1 la �I� - I 13-1__ 1 17? -1nm l l�^ien_m�I 1'7-lm-mI ICL -I- i is -I..., 1 10. .-iv, w w "I la "I" r w "I I0. I� 1 la ZQ!l A I0 FIs a N NI to �l a al l0 r, to �ltN— I 1 ICS�Immool 125 M 12 Imml I9�E —1 IogImNmol Iii IIs gl� A � -1 Io 01-- NI Io Ql I Id SIN to elm � �l Ii8z�l 13eI�S�2I IoQl�9i�ml 10 521 W I0�Immmml 13aI gNmI Irl sal?I� fN �I l.nla SIM MI I nI� dim m m INI7 C'M -M "M �mI IQID C m �I I lara_J I I�La J I M&C I I IW,LJ I I�I< I I Im _IWI 91 III 91 a 11,01 9lm _ gl lml 9k A <1 Ircl 91 1 Ir lYl "Iw w w wllal "Iw w w wll5l wli 5; i IIaI "Im C� i5 05I lol "Im M r MI CO 0 m V M v_ W LLIL z w J J LL z 7 L] 7 w H 11 n i I ****l I I A*aeael I I v o r al I I ****1 I I OOfVJ I I"N i I I"N. NrI I I"00��1 1° I __vI I� I I h I �vv1 I AM R! B V I! I I� II *N I I I mI�a 9 AI I I I I s11Z lr 19 Z 1I l I I I *Ism ;SNI 1 *19 0 1 Is R '*I I ael9sl°�� I i I_ i I I_ I I I_ I I I_ I i Mkt INa111WP1 INFa1P-�'-S'I INC3I0NZ-NE-1 IN81Q -;gq � a Z. I €� 0% m I a -I I I _i� =Iw =I- ���� I •ism �ml I �Ium-1,11 I Ju *1 1 .173 �1 > M >1 IlD,gn:I N1 Iosl m���l IWs10 o10s��Nl _ I Imitax2021 I 191 ;,. 11 r -I I I XI 119F_rr�I COCC 1 I.. aeaR*1 1 1. *1 1 1.. A I I._A I I��Iar4�nl 1 .9I611imaal I ana 11 0I 1-Riga2ml 10 1 C>> ! I I I I I I I! I I la Of `'4o I xliiwra�'m�T:I I e IIx<natI I eIfC4Sl IR Ful . e a I I I I I I I I I I I I Lgi 88m latltl Ir 6IuN_ r_I I ells.., nI I tm-Ianasl �°I z a I' I I I� I Il 'P�► Ir l �� n • 1 $1� 4 C •4I p I Qlrn m rn 01 p 1 bla v `O i ml .1 I ll, n �' A �1 4—J moo" I I II I II I II I W W W WI It _In W W W WI It .-17 W W W WI I">I61� W W W Wl lEa 1¢ a` a` a aI ut 431 a a` a` a` a`I n O m V ZR *1 114 1 _ _ _ _ 114 _I ", � i;I I AMR 'R I RR R1 I f I AIM -, A XI l I I I Al- $ 8 I I I I AN 1 9 R al I I I I �19�k 1_, I I L I 11", I I s�d�t� n Ig�IQ�vmWl ri u r� u' to°I9���NI H lo�l� �I w w ra w to°I �--.- �ai�Z I -1"0a l I =IA� > :5 R >cc> 9oll3m���1 I$ol ��c?ol > A2 1 19Y AaRI I I 2 21 1 1D9i I 91 1 1 ~I I 191 I I �F C C C C I I A I L- Ett!d I Le -!tel I 1 1 MC4--1 1 1 -1 11 �--0--11 1 el �9i 11fthsPI 141,1 01 1T%--1 .1 1!Ir1G1 I _I er; I sl1 1 gl��t�xl IB �T �p �to <!t I �eIIf�E?N�t �q?l Ig R1 d P a I I i I I `- I! I I I I 'v"-1 12;;1 k T 1.'% 1 .i I',=_Its o0—aaGi M'w-Itsa sml Mtrits"A IR 1 i s I- 1 1 1� I I I- I 1 1' 1 1 21 1 616A -N M1 I 815ggSg1 I bid, 25NN1 IW .J It°{1<n W W W WI II _I7 W W W WI 13 VI4 W W W WI I Sh W W W WI LJ If iR a` a` a` L 1 1c3 I a a` a` a` a` I Ica r i ¢ a` a` a` a` I Ci til < a` a` a` a` I V T] W n q c N T e SY n Q c'`d g qq C P w a a 10 v • 7M �� I>"IR00001 1> mNm�l I>�IRNmm-I v: IRaao 1 I...._ --I Imo_ I_. � _ I ILn_I 1 I0_ I....,. --I I ----I v I _ I Ia I I V I Cp e• e- I �I co mI I �I N Q N Q; n T e` I �I s� s�,l a• e� e I 'pI s Ml }�}? lool�N iz Z151 IsolmN°I IQOINis NI Isolm<E5 ZI WWI I I� mMMI I _IMR°��oI c c c c 41 I I o�001 I I �-�I I I NN�NI I I �'OOI 1391 I4�I—, j I-!pftI?�O IQ I5��.�I oI �-. o I" I__ __1 I" I__1 I" I_____I I_A mmi I o1;-;xMi I o11.1�14"1 1 =45 1 1AE-F! I �e131gxFAI I AIA 'IIP X01 IR 61 < e IR WI 22d IN=_It5 sil Im l RFKI I%t-Itisg9CRI Im 1=10 Tl N 91 O= a I" I I I" I I I" I I I" I I IJ mI I3.}hWW WWI IS.�I7WW WWI li ^17WWWWI I lhWW WWI I� i aaal l(?!`IQaaaal +IGaaaal ! @i!¢aaaal e Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections I. ?.IN In o11,1 I� 10 O W OI^I 1 el 'I0) . ICI al I I �Ir 'COO SIT -1 I;INIm1,41 19 woIcSI I!tIri!Rlgl I'o1 19101,1SIPI ml€ 1. 8, I I I I I I I I I I I -I I I I I I L I I I I I MA�l t I 1 =1 1521,01oIn1 I_ I_I_I_I_1 lei IqQlwIniv1 I -ice m .T � _1_1 .0 1(54 10Idui, i CUN I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IN 11 1 21 N m1o1 lwl..I. IC41 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.1 101 iml_I,INI Ii110 W)'Will 5� I I 11111111 11111111111IIiR ll n c� I Lmld MU 1.1-1. 1..1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I.,•I Im1_1. ll,l I'IA n� 1;41 ;� i '"I flliflll IIIIII{IIII111INf Irl a�, r, I 1_1 1 1_1 I. L I I I I I 1 1_1 Ll 1 1_1 II1_ alb ml- _ _I.1 _ _1_1 4 s• 0 1 N1. 1-1 V I 1 1'"1 I' I' I I I I I I IWI ICA I I_ I IIIIIIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IxoI I I o � � � E � of N1.- a- rl`I Iri"I IN! iT ..I�I I i I I I I�'I I�1-I•-INI I�IN r rlfOl o al _I 11 a NW N9I I l� a,INI 17-F 1."I I"I hI41IW1N1 IpIT w w1A1 o Y i, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I(oI I I m $ o 9 II NI� N r1�I l'ol"'i"l"l 1`" "11 1"1"11"1 1-1 1101"11°'11 19110 CO C1 I 1 y : �p 11 c19 1.8 P I 1021,11 1.. 1?1 M?I`PI'?IsI 1 1 1 lu1 C° ^117-1 WI E 9 air 51" VI'MI I I I I I I� NImI I I I I I I I I I I I I IcIm N wl I cl t! •o W a SIF M"M -90U I -911 IP1 IE -�1En1 14121.1,51 1,91 I:09IsI.IXI I I An 12.1 1 CSI ; m t cI =13 SIA iLI°'Islalal,?I I IE Rlmlalal° 131 I IBJ lala-iX I I&Iz'-§ LI I 51 m" ; e N ; =1 Ir ON -91-21 I II I"=_'I MA1211 I ISIS -I 1 SI X - T Rl a "l a = ksl IN -C-3101 1 114 4I 14LIVINIw`1 I IRI 1/131601 1 I sIW 19;1 Cal y Z g It J i1 1J J VI ILLI I I I I IJ v1 ILLI I I I I M I I I I IW1 11 an X1!2 mIQ�aNM�A m 2- I W 0 m I -q000>n Nt7 r �nr�co N I N N N N f+f M C7 � u u I 1123tI ItOmm LO CD I N I I I U5 no I N I I I I N I I I I 4 I I_i I N I IWI I l o l I I IV 1 w _ Iasa;as zi1<I 1 3 I rs,� Imo` I5f � I I I I I Ic I,R Ixatxxxxlxx:rl.cxat0161 IN >IN R J146 46 m h n AIA h h10 CD h 46101 I� ml� d I pI I l 2 C71 } N G I Of 0 6 x 0 0 ch N O 1 c71 I- 1 I Irl I InI�IrnlmlMlnl�lmlmlIrylrllmlal IIIIIIII I I11H ISI`'�I"�lal'�Imi°°I�ISI�°1'°I�I �f�'1ml Im�1-F F1;1:I;.,: :1;.1-1;1 I. - I 1_1_1.1_I.DU I I U_1 I I I I I I I I I I I I LU I I �5I-1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 L 1.1 1 I �II0I03I� �I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�ININI ' C F) C14 rlN �INI�IsINI�I I_ C1J I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I Io" dlvlMl..,I,. 1IrImImIrIvIwnImIQ1r,I 1—m1*1,1 I� vlphl I_.L..I^I�I"I�I�I^I�I�I-I�INI I Id �Is�I�I�I�Islslsi�I�I�INI�I�I�I�I� __ i `i i I I I I 1 I I I Ia Lnl�Ial�INlml I- 11-11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IrI L m W ff 2R < 19 f0 (G aD.O �i 04 � O N N=,)@I I� di lf� co � O � �®� N N�� a"�D R� %1_VI9I N D. ® ■ N 0- I� Ir Ib N N v �v ®iDI �I (p Ir YIO b m t, OM) �I®N OQO �IIII�cce) n .A v1110rD .�- I� aI i N al I-1�I0)a40 M b1m1— cmvooQse®mwr-,U2®viol o I0 ®"I I 0 12 Pit— -rt II,rf-Q)1_11111110*.I_1 12Alm vq?N(QN®iP.09P®r'nMt�®ZRU v010mor- r Y I 4 I 0®f-- ®� m IIIIIII1 * I_ I I4) MCN a m O O Lo®!, co mm"., n r h ®* I_ I N c0 O M Y7 n f0 M O O Q I.-- r r r r r ®r (-• r ®r rrr ®� I I 16 2 I r rrr r r M r r r n r r r r m Io Rol I Io N . .1 T M MII�M O l0 n�� z- �■O r �®� e- c%®�IwI I� -h e- < �'- �®� �- ®e= ;- r r®NI(�I O I dl ®_ I _ _ _1®.°I IVCD 0_—VO.V VV Q o WV0a)�rn r{I I.9 'ICD _ ((o_I ®T 1 $$ �OZ11O QOr M{'7r0 p �'�'j0 O 00 M c+�r0 C 11 Sig dI r r■r r r®rrr r�„ mlE xig �I r r®r r �®r r r r®.` m Sig fp I -C 1, ICF ° 1 �)fl4 IL7rNM O bN[O O) �i OI I "14 Rs r NMv u, cohm mCV IOI 17 I N 17 1 r CIS m b Z I �c� I �o� I I:c�l���� IYv, �o0 I a 0 T �• m W W C H) "' c a d }(� � W W C fy ca, o cSo I Ii MI:_'m3� 4) a, o = 2� I If Z Ij B e m a Y n .moi I P-% n m s( v m �\ 03 8 N tn ■M CO co P- O N N■ F., XI cm 1� X.I < Q ®m u07 N■V m c�■ IN al ® ® ■ IN aI ® ■ ■ ICIA r BI mRgix■A*�m■Mv!-Os%■ Ir -9l ARt!e■m z:;t■mtnm■ 1�b al ■ ■ ■ Is ai ■ ■ ■ IT:nl rr_r go!n■serr■se?tovw I A 952 inMc209QpMt) m��■ I� a I ■. . ■. . ■ I2 a I ■... ■. . ■ 10 I...00OD bol_ Ui 0C,■nrf,.■rf�Clh■SQI_.I mm1,mN■cnwCOW mrI.■4i 10 �I r r r r r®r r r■r r r r■�I I 10 Q1-. r r r r �W r r■r r r '®ml .I IC) 9I N M .Alm■ ,..■... �■NeI I Im R ,.. ..,■A .,, 1 la 21W 'Wv�r■r■nI'I toA.,,w���.®r�r®. Im&i I IN '91 I� ____■_.__■__ __®�I IUo �y 01 O Z e ;=Mm ■� a ■ Irl 10 210 O �=■- r �M" e- a r®MINI I� �I ■ ■ _i I I� �I ■ ■ _i I O O O O O N c -2O O 10 Q1� r 0 �'■r r r■r r r r■OI N S `Y. J O O O 0 0 I n NN r a D I I$ PI� r r 0■r r r®r E owll ig NstaW-amp a ;Z■i-i m■ � c9v,■ E"I<" IorNmaLn wt, co m N I -RI MQIMI< I�rCgmVL, 40�W 0,OrN R1 In;, I" I I I 11 1" I I I I D I a w IoW 1 1. Via Z n X59 ,. I Im ;IEtp2 n a c M -u_i n1� \ J S0m Q I �Ir FIs C.. F�Is N V 4 I MoSY1 5It C0V 1 IW1114m§20 n L° C3� V- I t IN zI\ G w v I IN ZI\ G C w v t M I m Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey Auburn School District Development Growth since 111101 March, 2006 41NCLF FAMILY Development Name UnItsi Parcels currento Occupancy Occupied Be Ashley Avenue 12 12 0 Bent Tree 20 20 0 Berkshire Crest 31 31 0 Berkshire Glen 95 95 0 Berkshire Glen Phase 2 98 98 0 Bifrost Gate 52 52 0 Canterberry Crossing 20 20 0 Carrington Meadows 56 56 0 Country Green 22 22 0 Crystal Court 13 13 0 Crvstal Meadows 27 27 0 Dawson Hills 6 5 1 Dennison Park 11 11 0 Dome Lane 16 16 0 Jomada 94 94 0 The Junction 49 49 0 Kell! Meadows 81 8 0 Kendall Heights 31 31 0 Kingsley Meadows 56 51 5 Lakeland: Ashton 54 54 0 Lakeland. Ashton Phase 2 102 102 0 Lakeland East rote 80 80 0 Lakeland, East ante Div 2 66 66 0 Lakeland: Evergreen 49 49 0 Lakeland Evergreen, Div 2/3 102 102 0 Lakeland Montiano 104 104 0 Lakeland Tuscany 76 76 0 Lakeland- Verona South 400 387 13 Lakeland Verona North 181 75 106 Lakeland. View Ridge South 74 74 0 LeeAnn Meadows 23 23 0 McDonnel Estates 6 6 0 Peasley Ride 54 54 0 River Park Estates 18 18 0 Royal Hills Division 1 49 49 0 Royal Hills Division 2 33 33 0 Soos Creek Vista 10 10 0 Summerfield Estates 40 40 0 Swansons Flat 21 21 0 Valley View Estates 8 8 0 Vintage Hills Division 6 61 61 0 Vintage Hills Division 7 201 20 0 Vistas 2 381 33 5 Washington National Div 1 421 321 5 Willow Park The Rid a -Ph 2 471 471 0 Z4/tl 1 1351 Student Generation Factors 48 Elem I Middle HS Total 0 1 1 2 17 6 10 33 10 5 9 24 49 29 27 105 45 17 18 80 241 18 12 54 1012 3 15 23 11 10 44 24 10 1 35 10 5 3 18 16 8 3 27 3 2 1 6 5 4 5 14 2 2 4 8 21 8 14 43 18 8 18 44 0 0 2 2 18 5 10 33 12 11 8 31 251 81 8 41 28 19 25 72 17 10 12 39 11 5 12 28 22 8 7 37 26 8 11 45 18 5 6 29 251 121 11 48 53 31 34 118 14 6 8 28 16 12 14 42 3 2 5 10 1 2 2 5 11 8 15 34 41 11 4 9 91 61 8 23 7 3 4 14 1 1 1 3 9 6 4 19 15 3 1 19 3 2 0 5 21 11 121 44 6 3 1 10 8 1 1 10 2 7 1 10 42 21 22 85 704 353 388 1445 0 3011 0.15111661 0.61731 Auburn School District Development Growth since 1/1/01 March, 2006 Developments to be completed Prior page Additional Students 1 411 201 221 83 Alder Meadows 30 1 29 Aspen Meadows 21 1 20 Hazel Park 15 5 10 Lakeland Vista Heights 125 4 121 River ante 118 4 114 Marchini Meadows 83 18 65 2006 Auburn Place 14 0 14 Carrington Pointe 24 0 24 Lakeland Pinnacle Estates 76 0 76 River Rim 12 0 12 Sera Monte 33 0 33 1591 �s91 2007 and uo Alicia Glenn 31 0 Anderson Acres 14 0 Backbone Ride 7 0 Beaver Meadows 60 0 Brandon Meadows 55 0 Brandon Place 78 0 Cambrid a Pointe 261 0 Dal it Dhaliwal Plat 8 0 Estes Park 31 0 Hansen Development 31 0 Har reet Kang 8 0 Hazel View 20 0 Kendall Ride 109 0 Kent Impound Area 386 0 Kersey 3 Project 373 0 Lawson Place 14 0 Little Fields 8 0 MysterV Hei hts 6 0 New Hope Lutheran Plat 8 0 Pacific Meadows 44 0 Plemmons Development 8 0 Vintage Place 25 0 Willow Place 18 0 1 13681 49 91 51 5 19 6 3 3 13 5 2 2 9 38 19 21 77 36 18 20 73 25 13 14 51 118 59 651 242 41 21 2 9 7 41 4 15 23 11 13 47 4 2 2 7 10 5 5 20 24 6 t ILO I�I�IMI olLO nlolrl0R11,11,1,00 LOILoco I I--I� I-�--�-I --I --I--a I .1616IMINI�41o1NIrIN® I I I I I I I I I �-elnlnl�l�l�l�lc�lnln® I I' I I I I I I F _Ta]Tlg1�-elsolaID1,.�1T® r r I I I I A -I 1=IMlolola16161afolos 1"IN1"Ir 1 i lNl�l`'I I �INlcolrnlr'I�IvIoNI I � 1 I�IvloI lololol 1 NINIMI. ILOIVINIo121LOisl IolNlol lololol 'ii � I olvlolMlMI�rlNl�l^IvIF°I I�Irlol lololol 0 1 4'I(o Ito I&DI TP1c)lMljl(oluil 1C)H(DI IaIc)lal 3 r � Q o to 51"I"I"I'"l"I"I"I"- 1 I'-IMIIn1A1 1"I' I -I I a Q . . . . . . . . . . . . ' fT1 l f I ITT! 1=511111111111 IIII IIII 1wit"I"I I-1-1-1 I of ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I 11 Al I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I h.= I=1tE1o1Cnjlir1NIaIr1",1A161 1 F-I(j�Iru�,1 IMIIUIlu"M I I I )Dial I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I inl;i 1 1t1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5?I 1 1 .I 1 1 1 1 1 I wi I IHI oI<1 ISI t:! I 19i I I I I M �I._I Ibllsl 1:;1i5131 Iml�4lol I III EI sl -L-I'olnli<*lial= I E I Gul5l11 1LL- 1T1121 `ol ..`I clml"ILl- I-`I`II"I�.I,.IpI 1`-'1"1"'1 I`_`I�lol PI 5IZJEI21C.1C�IEIAILLlA11 IrISII IEIGI -A �I >I�IYIYI.YIYIYIA°ILAIaI Q1.32141 1 41: 15-101