Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
3729
Ordinance No. 3729 (Amending or Repealing Ordinances) CFN=775 - Capital Improvement Program CFN=961 - Capital Facilities Plan Passed - 12/14/2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments School Districts' Capital Facilities Plans ORDINANCE NO. 3707 AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan to amend the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts (CPA -2004-2). RECITALS A. The Washington State Growth Management Act ("GMA") requires internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements and the plans from other B. To assure that comprehensive plans remain relevant and up to date, the GMA allows amendments to the capital facilities element of comprehensive plans concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a city budget (RCW 36.70A.130(2)(iii)). C. The City of Kent has established procedures for amending the Comprehensive Plan in chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code, allowing amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the City budget and allowing the City Council to hold the public hearing instead of the Land Use and Planning Board. D. The Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts have submitted amendments to their Capital Facilities Plans to be included in an amendment of City's Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. 1 Comprehensive Plan Amendments School Districts' Capital Facilities Plans E. After providing appropriate public notice, the City Council of the City of � Kent considered the requested comprehensive plan amendment and conducted a public hearing on the same on November 16, 2004. F. On September 29, 2004, the City provided the required sixty (60) day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 to the state of Washington of the City's proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan and the sixty (60) day notice period has lapsed. G. On December 14, 2004, the City Council for the City of Kent approved the Capital Facilities Element amendment CPA -2004-2 to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached and incorporated by this reference (CPA -2004-2); NOW, THEREFORE, NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE SECTION 1. - Amendment. The Capital Facilities Element of the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached and incorporated by this reference (CPA -2004-2). SECTION 2. - Severabthty. If any one or more sections, sub -sections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendments School Districts' Capital Facilities Plans SECTION 3. - Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after the date of passage as provided by law. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO t- Ld �i�lJt/ Z- CITY CLERK ATTORNEY PASSED day of December, 2004. APPROVED / 4 day of December, 2004. PUBLISHED /8 day of December, 2004. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. 3W, passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. (SEAL) - _ BRENDA JACOMR, CITY CLERK F �cinnoxnwaxcE\c nl`PWInR)!5-schoWMtmB'QPtWFuiliu sPI=2004 a« 3 Comprehensive Plan Amendments School Districts' Capital Facilities Plans EXHIBIT A Kent School 01 12033 SE 25e Street Ked, Washi Vw 98030.6643 (253)373-7295 strict SIX -YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2004 - 2005 - 2009 - 2010 4 % ENT 14CWXu DISrHtLi BOARD of DIRECTORS Bill Boyce Sandra Collins Scott Floyd usa Holliday Mike Jensen ADMINISTRATION Barbara Grohe, Ph.D. - Superintendent Fred H. High - Executive Director of Finance Mark Haddock, Ph.D. — Assistant Superintendent for Learning & School Improvement Margaret A Whitney — Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources Cada Jackson — Executive Director, Kent -Meridian Strand Joseph McBrayer, Ph.D. — Executive Director, Kentlake Strand Mem Rieger — Executive Director, Kentridge Strand Janis Bechtel — Executive Director, Kentwood Strand Gary Plano, Ed.D. — Executive Director of Instructional Services Valerie Lynch, Ed.D. — Executive Director of Special Services Donald Hall — Executive Director of Information Technology Kent Wod District Six -Year capital Facilities Plan April 2004 146 ENT SCHt}p1 t�uretcr SIX -YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2004 - 2005 - 2009 - 2010 April 2004 For information on the Plan, please call the Finance & Planning Department at (253) 373-7295 Capital Facilities Plan Contributing Staff Gwenn Escher-Derdowski, Forecast & Planning Administrator Don Walkup & Helen Shindell-Butler, Transportation Department Larry Price, Director of Facilities & Construction Karla Wilkerson, Facilities Department Cover Design by Debbi Smith Maps by Jana Tucker Kent School District Six -Year Capita Facill5a Plan April 2004 0 Nett school D�sfrlcl Sk Year Capital F'aciCties Plan 7a6te of Contents Section I Executive Summary I I Six -Year Enrollment Projection III District Standard of Service I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools V Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan V I Relocatable Classrooms VII Projected Classroom Capacity VIII Finance Plan, Cost Basis and Impact Fee Schedules I X Summary of Changes to Previous Plan X Appendixes Kent School DWnd Six Year CeOW FecWa Flan Page Number 2 4 8 11 14 17 18 23 30 31 Apra 2004 Y Executive Summary This Six-Year.Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Kent School District (the "District") as the organization's facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, Maple Valley and Black Diamond. This annual plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2004 for the 2003-2004 school year. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn and included In the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Pians of each jurisdiction. The first ordinance implementing impact fees for the unincorporated areas was effective September 15, 1993. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee -implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Plan has also been submitted to cities of Maple Valley, Black Diamond, SeaTac, and Renton. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a "standard of service" in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Program capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Relocatables in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (continued) Kent Sdwd District Six -Year Capital Faaildo Plan April 2004 Page 2 I Executive Summary (=nunued) The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District standard of service and the existing inventory, which includes some relocatable classrooms. The District's program capacity of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the reduction of class size to meet the requirements of Student Achievement Initiative 728. Relocatables provide additional transitional capacity until permanent facilities are completed. Kent School District is the fourth largest district in the state. Enrollment is reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) on Form P223. Enrollment on October 1 is considered to be the enrollment for the year. P223 Headcount for October 1, 2003 was 26,449. P223 FTE (Full Time Equivalent) enrollment was 25,357.55. (FTE reports Kindergarten at .5 and excludes Early Childhood Education [ECEJ and college -only Running Start students.) The actual number of individual students per the October 2003, full head count was 26,870. (Full Headcount reports all students at 1.0 including IGndergarten, ECE and college -only Running Start students.) The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of transitional facilities are reviewed in detail In various sections of this Plan. Our plan is to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of relocatables. A financing plan is included in Section V I I I which demonstrates the District's ability to implement this Plan. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated annually with changes In the fee schedules adjusted accordingly. Kent SOW DWd Sbc Year Cep1W FaoMbn Plan Apra 2004 Pape 3 I I Six -Year Enrollment Frojeation For capital facilities planning, growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years. (see Table 2) The student generation factor, as defined on the next page, is the basis for the growth projections from new developments. King County births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system. (see Table 1) 8.06% of 22,007 King County live births In 1999 is forecast for 1,772 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2004. Together with proportional growth from new construction, 8.06% of King County births is equivalent to the number of students projected to enter kindergarten in the district for the next six-year period. (s" ra* z) Early Childhood Education students (sometimes identified by others as "Preschool Special Education [SE] or handicapped students") are calculated and reported separately on a .5 FTE basis. The first grade population is traditionally 7 - 8% larger than the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District from private kindergartens. Cohort survival method uses historical enrollment data to forecast the number of students projected for the following year. Near term projections assume some growth from new developments to be offset by current local economic conditions. With a few notable exceptions, the expectation is that enrollment increases will occur District -wide in the long term. District projections are based on historical growth patterns combined with continuing development of projects in the pipeline dependent on market and growth conditions. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools and monitor conditions to reflect adjustments in this assumption. The six-year enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new development currently In some phase of planning or construction in the district. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions may be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The Kent School District serves seven permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, and Auburn and a small portion of the city of Maple Valley. The west Lake Sawyer area is in the city limits of Black Diamond and Kent Mountain View Academy is located in the small portion of the City of SeaTac seared by Kent School District. (Continued) Kent School District Six Year capital FwAla a plan April 2004 Page 4 ii Six - Year Enrollment Projection (CM*KW) STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor" Is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last five years. The Student Factor has been updated to reflect the secondary grade level reconfiguration. Following these guidelines, the student generation factor for Kent School District is as follows; Single Family Elementary .482 Middle School .161 Senior High .284 Total .927 Multi -Family Elementary .293 Middle School .069 Senior High .114 Total .476 The student generation factor Is based on a survey of 4,219 single family dwelling units and 2,701 muttl-family dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy rates. Please refer to Appendix E on Pages 35-36 for details of the Student Generation Factor survey. The actual number of dents in those residential developments was determined using the Districts Education Logistics (EDULOG) Transportation System. In 4,219 single family dwelling units there were 2,035 elementary students, 679 middle school students, and 1,197 senior high students for a total of 3,911 students. in 2,701 multi -family dwelling units, there were 791 elementary students, 186 middle school students, and 308 senior high students, for a total of 1,285 students. Kent Sdod DWd sbc-Year (appal Fuffiitks Pian April 2004 Page 5 T 0 Z W F— J t? J co) Z W Li O~ = LL V M coN I, N ■z` a W Ym O O to r r CODS O 6>, O N O �Ap O N If A O ch O C%L !DV' Cl) V e NO aD r r r N N N N NCD Nj' m Ct r pN O cN VOA O CD < N V f0 A 00 W r r N N N N C? N N N r r � N N I► n 8$ 1 1� sN� �f N C st cq 1� r r r W r N N r N r N (� N r N r N N N r r O N m N N d; aR �p O O O pp O r CA N co O CO N co)oh � 1� N 4Lei O aD W m r N Cd N ci N N N N N N N N r �" N r 4 N 0) pp p> Go^ O r 00 O 0 O t l'O 1n O O r r N r N N N N N N N N N r r N r O cs O p� cpppp qqpQp pM03 �N C%d I cy m CD m O N ce{ N N N N r r �' r r N N do do N W CC4p b N M CO) 4ma *- N 1+ O o N .- N o N Np a Np N obi c> a; r' w r' r r r CMO r IN !� N � GD � N N cn pry of aq N W co ct N aq CrD m co y ti tO0 n C W N N r r r r r r C N r r r N'f ain `- �; r O N O O N r 't t0 cc') ti cP O P7 g CW) c W r O N AO, r O N aN7 t0 V N N r' O W N to i 0 W .0 N 'OO O COD C� N aapp O O O W r r r r r v W �- r r' r r r lV NC6 O CO O WppW 1► Lf) WA 0 0 CD I� Q QN co •' N O N m O! N W al p 1f1 as O O cl r r CA O 00 aD N r CQ v N 1 W CD CD C9 w 4 O O V O p� N 17 g O7 O W N COV N CA co cc+) m m N CQ N r COD O to cq Go � CO It t 0 c0 V N CA r r r r r r r r r: r N r COD_ W tO. m m b CO arp pr N r O aD O r r r r r r r r r r r r N N co N m �r z ` W ® r N M a W W h a0 O) a 04 C � p� 0! m o m 0 m 01 01 m m 0)13 4 c� c7 t9 o c� d o c) 0 C) ~ N M KENT 84DHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX -YEAR F.T.E. ENROLLMENT PROJECTION IOng Cmity live Bilths' 22,195 22,007 22,487 21,778 21,863 21,950 22,030 ' Inc cease / Decrease 73 488 480 -709 85 87 80 IGndergarten / Binh % : 8.06% $.06% 8.06% 8.06% 8.06% 8.06% 8.06% 1 Eery Cthiftod Eftetion a .6 93 80 88 97 107 118 130 "' Kindergarten FTE ® .5 894 886 931 908 914 918 921 Grade 1 1,851 11896 1,873 1,972 1,927 1,940 1,948 Grade 2 11985 1,892 1,961 1,942 2,046 2,000 2,014 Grade 3 1,975 2,005 1,957 2,032 2,016 2,122 2,075 Grade 4 2.072 1,991 2,054 2,010 2,089 2,073 2,180 Grade 5 2,067 2,071 2,048 2,117 2,075 2,155 2,139 Grade 6 2,205 2,121 2,142 2,123 2,197 2,154 2,235 Grade 7 2,209 2,264 2,189 2,238 2,209 2,285 2,241 Grade 8 2,351 2,182 2,279 2,231 2,271 2,242 2,318 Grade 9' 2,309 95 401 394 291 198 211 Grade 9 e 0.02% 2,525 2,449 2,573 2,517 2,560 2,522 Grade 10 2,207 2,234 2,361 2,305 2,418 2,364 2,398 Grade 11 1,787 1,948 1,992 2,119 2,068 2,166 2,112 Grade 12 1,466 1,451 1,623 1,674 1,778 1,733 1,806 -Total FTE Enrollment 25,451 25,546 25,947 25,341 26,632 26,830 27,041 wrsvarc Yearly Inxease 4 95 401 394 291 198 211 Yearly Increase % 0.02% 0.37% 1.57% 1.52% 1.10% 0.74% 0.79% Cumulative Increase 4 99 500 894 1,185 1,383 1,594 Full Time E ivalent FTE 25451 25,546 25,947 1 26,341 26,632 26,830 27,041 `'•. ' IOrbsrgarten projee8ai based on ling Counly actual M birth percentage and proportional growth from now construction. s Wndergaden FTE enrollment projection 21 .5 Is coWded by using the DWrid's percentage of l(Ing County Bye births 5 years earlier compared to actual kindergarten enrolirrowd In the previous year. (khcktles ECE 0.5 - Early Childhood Ed) WwW9arten pm*tbn is at .5 FTE although most adwall have FW Day Kirhdergartan at 1.0 FTE with alternative funding. e Oct 2003 P223 FTE Is 25,358 3 Headcount Is 28,449. Full student count with ECE Preschool 6 Running Start - 28,870. a Grade level recon8guratiwh. In 2004.911% grade novas to the senior high schools. O W T H P R 0 J E ' For facilities planing purposes, this sit -year enrollment projaction anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new development arrendy In some phase of planting or construction in the district. Kent School District Six Year capital FarhYNlos plan Table 2 Agri 2004 Page 7 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of the Districrs facilities, King County Code 21A.06 refers to a "standard of service" that each school district must establish In order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the District which would, in the District's judgment, best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as "impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower class size at those facilities. Relocatables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (See AppendixA, a & c) The standard of service defined herein may continue to change in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service adjustments to meet the requirements of Student Achievement Initiative 728. This process will affect various aspects of the District's "standard of service" and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Because the funding for Initiative 728 is incremental, implementation of the Initiative is also Incremental and may result in annual changes to school capacity. Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students Class size for grades K - 3 should not exceed an average of 22 students. Class size for grade 4 should not exceed an average of 23 students. Class size for grades 5 - 6 should not exceed an average of 29 students. Program capacity for regular -education elementary classrooms is calculated at an average of 24 students per classroom because of fluctuations between primary and intermediate grade levels (i.e. thirdffourth or fourth/fifth grade split classes, etc.). Many elementary schools now provide full day kindergarten programs with the second half of the day funded by grants or tuition. Students have scheduled time in a computer lab. Students may also be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (confined) Kent Sdwd oishict Six -Year CeptW FadNa Plan Apra 2004 Page a III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs such as those designated as follows: English Language Learners (E L L) Self-contained Special Education Support Center Programs Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Early Childhood Education (ECE) (34 yr. old students with disabilities) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) District Remediation Programs School Adjustment Programs for severely behavior -disordered students Programs for Hearing Impaired students Mild, Moderate and Severe Developmental Disabilities Developmental Kindergarten Kindergarten Academic Intervention Program (KAI-Full Day Kindergarten) Learning Assisted Programs (IAP) Education for Highly Capable Students (formerly "Gifted" Program) Some of the above special programs require specialized classroom space, as well as music and physical education classrooms, computer labs, etc.; thus, the permanent capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in these special programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs. Some newer buildings have been constructed to accommodate most of these programs; some older buildings have been modified, and in some circumstances, these modifications reduce the classroom capacity of the buildings. When programs change, program capacity fluctuates and Is updated annuallyto reflect the change in program and capacity. Current Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings. Reductions have been made in 7s' and 10s' grade English classes for Initiative 728. These standards are subject to change pending annual updates based on staff and public review for changes funded by Student Achievement Initiative 728. Class size for grades 7 - 9 should not exceed an average of 29 students. Class size for 7s' & Ie grade English class should not exceed an average of 25 students. Class size for grades 10 -12 should not exceed an average of 31 students. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (CW*x0d) Kent SdwW WW d Sbc YOW CWW FadWJm PM AO 2M pap 9 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (conunued) Identified students will also be provided other education opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows: Computer Labs English Language Leamers (E L L) Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Preschool and Daycare Programs Highly Capable (Honors or Gifted) and Advanced Placement Programs Basic Skills Programs Traffic Safety Education JROTC - Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps Variety of Career and Technical Education Programs (Vocational Education) i.e. Home & Family Life (Cooking, Sewing, Child Development, etc.) Business Education (Keyboarding, Accounting, Business Law, Sales & Marketing, etc.) Woods, Metals, Welding, Electronics, Manufacturing Technology, Auto Shop, Commercial Foods, Commercial Art, Drafting & Drawing, Electronics, Careers, etc. Many of these programs and others require specialized classroom space which can reduce the permanent capacity of the school buildings. In addition, an alternative home school assistance, choice and transition program is provided for students in grades K -12 at Kent Mountain View Academy. Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 85% for secondary schools. Program capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level with adjustments for pull-out programs served in retocatables. In the future. the District will continue close analysis of actual utilization. Kern school DWd Six Year QOW Fa*dm Pan AM =4 Pace 10 IV Inventory and Cgmclty of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 25,512 students and transitional (relocatable) capacity to house 2,150. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section I I L Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity. (See Table 3 on Page 12) The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs, additional classrooms and the addition of new schools. It also reflects adjustments to the Student Achievement Initiative 728 reduction in class size. The class size reduction received voter approval in the Educational Programs and Operations Levy as well as through funding from Student Achievement Initiative 728. The District will conduct annual public review and update class size recommendations in accordance with the requirements and incremental funding of Student Achievement Initiative 728. Kent Mountain View Academy (formerly Kent Leaming Center) serves grades Kindergarten through 12 with transition, choice and home school assistance programs. It is located in the former Grandview School in the western part of the District in the city of SeaTac. This school was originally designed as an elementary school. Calculation of Elementary, Junior High and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B and C. A map of existing schools is included on Page 13. Kant SdWd Diakid Six Year Calft FadWft Plan Apri 2004 Pape 11 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS Ifi}e :} }'ear }i}i:ci:}:}i}ia}}}ii }ti}:€ ' }}}ii I i•:'i C.:$i}}: all • :o-yy }E:t .t • 2009-2004 k4 . . Y:: 1,•trh :}ii } Year SCHOOL Opened ASR ADDRESSProgram =}.::.• }.:ki:S ::?n :'rr(::.}} i:::::•'i::tiv ;•.S . illy}}• tl}i:i}:}•}l:l}:: :} ::� ::}:.2 =}}� i•i}}iK:•'• ::::.>::: t i.i. ._.::. :}t::t•::::..:::::::}:}:}t=:}}:::xF,rf•},:t::yy.: K:;::=;}:... ..... i.....:.:.. moi.:=:•:_::;::} VO }=1:} Cartage Crest Eleoetary 1990 CC 18235 -140th Avarua SE. Renton 98058 490 CaderValley EMmwfty 1971 CV 25500Unbed" Way SE, Covirplon 98042 442 Cmrkpton Sernenlery 1961 CO 17070 SE Wax Road, Covkpton 98042 524 Cwslvood Elermerbry 1980 CW 25225 -180th Avenue SE, Covkpton 98042 458 Daniel ENmentary 1992 DE 11510 SE 248th Street Kat 98031 486 East FW Ebnnenbry 1953 EH 9825 S 2401h Street Kat 98031 442 Emerald Park 1999 EP 11800 SE 218th Street Kent 98031 504 _Fdrvwad Bmwrdary 1909 FW 18800 -148M Avenue SE, Renton 99058 472 C,trrddpe Serronbry 1998 13R 19405 -120th Avenue BE. Rendon 96058 470 Grass Lake Ewnwrkary 1971 OL 26700 -191st Placa SE, Kent 98042 480 Haimon BwmVary 1990 HE 27641 -144th Avenue BE. Kent 98042 462 Ar"m Creek ENn eribry 1987 JC 25915 -188th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 452 Kent Elernentary 1898 KE 24700 - 64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 482 Lake Youngs Elenwntary 1985 LY 19660 -142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 562 me* Sahni ewwnbry 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street Kent 98031 480 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710 -108th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 447 lertr>rn Ebnwnbry 1939 ME 25621 -140th Avenue BE. Kent 94042 562 Millennium O nnenbry 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street Kerd 98031 466 Neey4YBrlan Ebrnenbry 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Skeet Kent 98032 470 Panther Lab Elementary 1938 PL 20831 -108th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 405 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 BE 232nd Street, *Kerd 98031 500 Pke Tres ewmfty 1957 PT 27825 -118th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 504 Rdpearood Sernentary 1987 RW 18030 -182nd Place SE, Renton 98058 504 aww Woods awasnbry 1994 SW 31135 - 226th Avenue BE. Kent 98042 504 Somm Hal EbnwMey 1980 SH 25025 Wooded Way South, Karl 98031 468 Soo Creek Semenbry 1971 SC 12651 BE 2181h Place, Kent 98031 462 SpNpbrook Ebme Lary 19th SB 20035 -100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 476 &wise Ebmenbry 1992 SR 22300 -132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 526 Semanbry TOTAL 13,481 Cader Hei" Jutar High 1993 CH 19840 SE 272 Street Covkpton 98042 949 Kok Junbr High 1952 KJ 820 North Centrd Avenue. Kent 98032 818 Milson Ju6or High 1981 MA 18400 SE 251st Street C& kom 98042 808 Meeker Judar High 1970 MK 12800 BE 192nd SsrawK Renton 98058 890 Meddan Junior High 1968 MJ 29480 -120th Avenue SE. Kent 98031 747 Nmsavood Ax*w Mth 1998 NW 17007 BE 184th Street Renton 98058 944 Sequoia Affix High 1968 SJ 11000 BE 264th Street Kent 98031 am JudorH9phTOTAL 5,954 Kat-Mstdien Senior High 1951 94=1 10020 SE 256M Sint Keri 98031 1,417 KKNaM Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 BE 300th Street Kant 96042 1,822 Katddpe Senior No 1968 KR 12430 BE 2091h Street Kart 98031 1,301 Kentwood Sardor High 1981 KW 25800 -164th Avenue SE, Corkpton 98042 1291 Senor HIO TOTAL 5,631 Kent Maxdakn View Acadenry a 1985 LC 22420 Military Road. Dee Moires 98198 416 DISTRICT TOTAL 25,512 Changes to eapecly m5ed Program dianpes and a4 mbnents to dose ntu for AcedemieAchievemsnt Initiative 728. 2 Ked Mountain View Academy serves Wades K -12. The sd10d was fomw y luvawvn as Kent Leamkp Center 8 Grendvbw FJementary Kent Sawa District Skc-Yoe Ca*1 FacMq Pan Table 3 Apar 2094 Page 12 LO 0 00 ' G Z �V � o -,� cCC�f=13O 452Om�Cmy aQ8-0 ° �� o Vm oV ��u Z,g!!K I is ,81 ! �, a N N r Y ar E u Q O CO =0 W u t0 aim7 = O E O 0 c a W th N a Kat School ObW Six -Yew Capita FacUMas Plan Pape 13 j Sew WMI N N r Y ar E u Q O CO =0 W u t0 aim7 = O E O 0 c a W th N a Kat School ObW Six -Yew Capita FacUMas Plan Pape 13 j V Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan At the time of preparation of titin Plan in spring of 2004s the following projects are completed or in the placating phatie In the District: • Construction for additions to three high schools is in progress. The Board authorized grade level recohf u ation to move 9 grade students to high schools and serve 7'a and e grade students at middle schools. New classroom additions will add capacity for additional students from new development and 90 Grade students moving to the high schools. Construction is expected to be complete by September 2004. • Reconfiguration will provide additional capacity at middle schools. Implementation is expected for September 2004. • The Board approved temporary closure of Kent Junior High for re -purpose and remodel. In 2004-05, students from KJH will attend other middle schools when all 9'' grade students have moved to the high schools. Kent Junior High is expected to re -open as a New Middle School 7a with additional programs in September 2005. • Enrollment trends continue to show an increase in enrollment at the secondary level and a slight decline at the elementary level. Projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the high school level and facility needs are pending preliminary district review. • The Board authorized purchase of a site for Junior High #8 east of 124x' Avenue SE at SE 28e Street. That site was determined not to be feasible and the property is for sale. • Sties for potential future schools and facilities are listed in Table 4 and shown on the site map on page 17. • Some funding is secured for purchase of additional portables and some funding may be provided by impact fees as needed. Sites are based on need for additional capacity. County and city planners and decision -makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety, pull-outs and tum -grounds for school buses. Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site altematives in the future. (see rabre 4) The voter approved bond issue for $105.4 million in 1990 and $130 million in 1994 included funding for the purchase of eleven sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are Included in this Plan. Some funding is secured for purchase of additional sites but some may be funded with Impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. 2002 voter approval of $69.5 million bond issue for capital improvement included the construction funding for additions to three high schools which are scheduled to be completed in August 2004. Student Achievement Initiative 728 funds are being utilized to reduce Gass size and provide extended leaming opportunities. Based on community input at public hearings, the Board will continue annual review of standard of service and those decisions will be reflected in the each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. Kent Sdwol DiaWd SWYaw Capitei FadlOdw Plan Apra 2004 Page 14 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity Projected I %for Program now Date ELEMENTARY ftsribers assigned to Adure schools may not mate with number of existing schools.) Eleneda y # 31 (Uofunded)1 To be determined New Planning 2010? 500 75% rcejponed 3 pending future ►evlew} JUNIOR HIGH/ MIDDLE SCHOO Grade Level Raoonfigtaa0on will Move Stir grade to High School Program Planning 2004 WA WA provide additional Capacity at Middle Schools SENIOR HIGH SE 2513184 SE, Covington 98042 Elementary City of Covington 7 Co ftlon area (Scarsds) Classroom addklons at three KenlrMerldlan Additions cw*uctlm 2004 300 75% high sdx ds and move Ksntridge Additions commram 2004 900 75% 9th Grade to high school Kellwood Additions cmam ow 2004 800 75% Senior ft #5 (Unfunded) To be deWffrdned 2 New Planning 2009 1,622 75% Additional TEMPORARY I Capacity Rebcatables For placement as needed New Planning 2004 ♦ 24-31600 100% SUPPORT FACILITIES Batt Fsd6ty (UnfistdoM' Near Kent -Meridian High School New Planning "Mo Y N ! A SonIand Use Mw 1 a OTHER SITES ACQUIRED T Jurisdiction 4 Cowirom area (Near Mattson JH) SE 2513184 SE, Covington 98042 Elementary City of Covington 7 Co ftlon area (Scarsds) SE 290 3156 SE, Kent 08042 ElernerKary King County 5 Co4nom area West (Halleson) 15435 SE 258 Street Codngion 98042 TBD 2 qty of Covington 3 Han Lake area (Pollard) 16820 SE 240. Kent 98042 Elementary King County 8 SE of Lake Marion ams (West) SE 332 3 204 SE, Kent 98042 Secondary King County 2 Shady lake arca (Sowers, etc.) 17428 SE 192 Street, Renton 95058 Elementary King County 1 So, King Co. Activity Canter (Nice sir) SE 187 3170 SE, Rendon 95058 TBD 2 King County 12 FwwJr is #e s m (t a-Yahwnu) SE 288th Skeet 3124th Ave. SE, Ker Sha was determined to be "unbutidabW for a junior high i midde school and property is for sale. Nokwa: 1 Unfunded family needs vA be reviewed In the future. 2 TBD -To be de*n*md - Some sibs we w Wlmd but placement iknirrg and/or wnrWrador have not been detemined. Numbers correspond to sites on Map on Page 16.Otisr site locations we parcels identified In Table 7 on Page 28. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 April 2004 Page 15 41 0 90 Kent School Disb t Siz-Ysw Capidl FacMg" Plan p ��c aswQ"I J I� =•�a wre= ac> O Z .y � a m o -- 41 0 90 Kent School Disb t Siz-Ysw Capidl FacMg" Plan p ��c aswQ"I J I� =•�a wre= VI Relocatable Classrooms For the purpose of clarification, the tern "portables" and the more descriptively accurate term, "relocatables" are used interchangeably in this Plan. The Pian also references use of portables or relocatables as interim or transitional capac ity)facilities. Currently, the District utilizes 154 total relocatables to house students in excess of permanent capacity, for program purposes at school locations, and six for other purposes. (see AppendkesAa c n) Based on enrollment projections, program capacity and funded permanent facilities, the District anticipates the need to purchase some additional relocatables during the next six-year period During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District's relocatables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the relocatables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these relocatables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables, or relocatables, may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Portables, or relocatables, currently in use will be evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced. Quality concerns will be among those addressed by the next Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee in review of capital facilities needs for the next bond issue. The Plan projects that the District will use relocatables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of relocatables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between relocatables, emerging technologies and educational restructuring will continue to be be examined. Kent Sd*N M*Ict Sbc Year CapkW FaMn Mn Apdr 2004 Pape 17 VII Projected Six -Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section I V, the program capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size reduction in Grades K - 4. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3 on Page 12, the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts. (See Tables 56 5A-B-Conpages 18-22) Enrollment is reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment Is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is set by OSPI as the "enrollment count date' for the year. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) student enrollment for October 1, 2003 was 25,357.55 with kindergarten students counted at .5 and excluding Early Childhood Education students (ECE - preschool special education) and College - only Running Start students. (See Tablas 5 d 5A -8 -Con papas 19-22) On October 1, there were 466 students in 11'hand 12"' grade participating in the Running Start program at 9 different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. 226 of these students attended classes only at the college ("college -only") and are thus excluded from the headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District continues to be the fourth largest district in the state of Washington. P223 Headcount for October 1, 2003 was 26,449 with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECE and college -only Running Start students. A full headcount of all students enrolled on October 1, 2003 totals 26,870 which includes ECE and college -only Running Start students. Based on the enrollment forecasts, current inventory and capacity, current standard of service. relocatable capacity, and future planned additional classroom space, the District anticipates having sufficient capacity to house students over the next six years. (See Table Sand Tables 5A$Con Papel 19-22) This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There may be significant need for additional portables and/or new schools to accommodate growth within the District and class size reduction mandated under Student Achievement Initiative 728. Some schools, by design, may be opened with relocatables on site. Boundary changes, limited movement of relocatables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and undenitilization of facilities in different parts of the District. Kent S*AxA David six Yar capM FacHmas PWn AM 2M Pap 111 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No, 415 PROJECTED .ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT Permanent Program CapacRy ' 125,512 25,512 26,696 27,496 27,496 New Permanent Construction � a Grade level rscordWration - Mh grade MoVeS b Mph schools in 2004 Temporary dosurs of Kent Junior t8ph - New NYddle School 7a reopens in 2005. Estimated program capacity -816 800 Additions to 3 Senior High schools 2,000 Senior High #5 27,496 27,496 1,622 Permanent Program Capacity ----sub-tota-l� 25,512 26,696 27,496 27,496 27,496 27,496 29,118 Interim Relocatable Capacity I eememtary Redoe s" Cepe ty Req *W 0 0 SCHOOL YEAR 3 20032004 2004-200.5 2005.2008 2006.2007 2007-2008 2008.2009 2009-2010 Adud P R O J E C T E D 0 Permanent Program CapacRy ' 125,512 25,512 26,696 27,496 27,496 New Permanent Construction � a Grade level rscordWration - Mh grade MoVeS b Mph schools in 2004 Temporary dosurs of Kent Junior t8ph - New NYddle School 7a reopens in 2005. Estimated program capacity -816 800 Additions to 3 Senior High schools 2,000 Senior High #5 27,496 27,496 1,622 Permanent Program Capacity ----sub-tota-l� 25,512 26,696 27,496 27,496 27,496 27,496 29,118 Interim Relocatable Capacity I eememtary Redoe s" Cepe ty Req *W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jr Hnabme SdXxO Relocetaae CwSG4 Rued 8999 0 0 0 0 0 0 serdarHa,RebcedaaaCapnatyaaqured 0 558 806 1,054 1,178 1,209 0 rotas Relocatawe Ce Requhed 1&4 899. 558 806 1,054 1,178 1,209 0 TOTAL CAPACITY t • 1 26,411 1 27,254 1 28,302 ' 28,550 1 28,674 1 28,705 1 29.118 1 2aa [TOTAL FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 25,451 25,546 25,947 26,341 26,632 26,830 27,041 r Capacity is based on standard of service for program Capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 FTE = Fuc Time Equivalent Enrollment (le. ECE Preschool & 1/2 day IGndergarten student = .5). , 3 In 2004, 8th grade will move to the high schools and resuk In Increased capacity at Middle School level. 4 2003-2004 total classroom relocatable capacity is 2,150. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plat Table 5 April 2004 Pape 19 KENT- SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH rentor Ho Pe wwd 5,631 5,631 7,631 7,631 7,631 7,631 7,631 New Pamowd Senior High cm ftcdon Grade levet remn0yuraim • 9th Grade students move to high achads In 2004 Classrooms added at free NO schools Esdmaied program caps* 2,000 Senior High #5 1,622 subtow 5,631 7,631 7,631 7,631 7,631 7,631 9,253 Relocatatle CaWfty Required 1&4 0 558 806 1,054 1,178 1,209 0 .. d Number of ftslocatables Raqu4ad 213 761 12 14 28 0 18 26 34 38 39 0 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment, excluding College -only Running Start students. Approximately 200 9th grade students are served all or part of the day at high schools. 3 Grade level reconfiguration - All 9th grade students will nave to the high schools In 2004. KOM SdW DOkt Six -Year Capiml FacUes Plan Table 5 A A d 2004 Page 20 SCHOOL YEAR 2003-2004 3 2004-2005 I 2005.2006 2008.2007 2007-2006 2008.2009 1 2009.2010 Actual P R O J E C T E D rentor Ho Pe wwd 5,631 5,631 7,631 7,631 7,631 7,631 7,631 New Pamowd Senior High cm ftcdon Grade levet remn0yuraim • 9th Grade students move to high achads In 2004 Classrooms added at free NO schools Esdmaied program caps* 2,000 Senior High #5 1,622 subtow 5,631 7,631 7,631 7,631 7,631 7,631 9,253 Relocatatle CaWfty Required 1&4 0 558 806 1,054 1,178 1,209 0 .. d Number of ftslocatables Raqu4ad 213 761 12 14 28 0 18 26 34 38 39 0 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment, excluding College -only Running Start students. Approximately 200 9th grade students are served all or part of the day at high schools. 3 Grade level reconfiguration - All 9th grade students will nave to the high schools In 2004. KOM SdW DOkt Six -Year Capiml FacUes Plan Table 5 A A d 2004 Page 20 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY JUNIOR HIGH / MIDDLE SCHOOL :.................... .......................,........... : . SCHOOL YEAR a 2x09-2004 2W4 2005 1 2005-2006 2006.2007 2007-2008 200&2009 2009-2010 Actual P R O J E C T E D Jr High i Noddle Sdwd Program Caped ty I 5,984 5,984 5,168 5,968 5,968 5,968 5,968 New Cape ' (torn Grade Recortfipmdon Grade level ntconflguration . 9tlt grade sdldents MOW to high SdX)ob In 2004 4 Kent Junior Ho dosed for remodel in 200405 - New Middle Scholl 7a re -opens in 2005 Estimated program capacity -816 800 Subtotal 5,984 5,168 5,968 5,968 5,968 5,968 5,968 Relocatable Capacity Required 899 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 193 603 5,168 5,968 5,968 5,968 5,968 5,968 FTE ENROUjAEW / PROJECTION 2 6M 4,4-46- 4,468 4,469 4,480 4,527 4,559 SURPLUS DEFICIT CAPACITY 1 14 722 1,500 1,499 1,488 1,441 1,409 Number of RNopMables Required 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 r Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program dwiges. 2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrolment / Projection Approximately 200 9th grade students are currently served at high schools. Grade level reconfiguration - All 9th grade students will move to the high schools In 2004. 4 Kent Junior High dosed for remodel In 2004-05 - New Middle School re -opens in Fal 2005 Kent Sdwd DWM Six -Year C.*W Fat4118es Plan Table 5 B Md 2004 Page 21 -S KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY( ELEMENTARY IF-lementary Permanent Prograin 13,481 13,897 13,897 13,897 13,897 13,897 13,897 Kent mountWn view Academy' 416 �Pennanent Elementary Cons6udion None projected until after 2009 4 Subtctal 13,897 13,897 13,897 13,897 13,897 13,897 13,897 Relocatable Capacity Requked 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 2 13,897 13,897 13,897 13,897 13,897 13,897 13 897 FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION s 13,122 12,942 13,054 13,201 13,371 13,480 13,642 SURPLUS DEFICIT CAPACITY 1 775 955 843 696 526 417 255 Number of Reloeatabies Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Kent Mountain View Academy Is a special program at Grandview School serving students in Grades K -12. The school (formerly Kerd Learning Center 3 Grandview Elem.) was designed as an elementary school. 2 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 3 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrolment or Projection (ECE & Kindergarten @ .5) 4 Facility needs are pending review. trent school aebia six-year capital Facf u Plan Table 6 C Apdi 2004 Page 22 { SCHOOL YEAR 2003-2004 2004.2005 1 2005-2006 2008-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 1 2009-2010 Arcual P R O J E C T E D IF-lementary Permanent Prograin 13,481 13,897 13,897 13,897 13,897 13,897 13,897 Kent mountWn view Academy' 416 �Pennanent Elementary Cons6udion None projected until after 2009 4 Subtctal 13,897 13,897 13,897 13,897 13,897 13,897 13,897 Relocatable Capacity Requked 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 2 13,897 13,897 13,897 13,897 13,897 13,897 13 897 FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION s 13,122 12,942 13,054 13,201 13,371 13,480 13,642 SURPLUS DEFICIT CAPACITY 1 775 955 843 696 526 417 255 Number of Reloeatabies Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Kent Mountain View Academy Is a special program at Grandview School serving students in Grades K -12. The school (formerly Kerd Learning Center 3 Grandview Elem.) was designed as an elementary school. 2 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 3 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrolment or Projection (ECE & Kindergarten @ .5) 4 Facility needs are pending review. trent school aebia six-year capital Facf u Plan Table 6 C Apdi 2004 Page 22 VIII ' Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2004 - 2005 through 2009 - 2010. The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on voter approval of future bond issues, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. Kent Elementary #27a, which opened in January 1999 as a replacement for the original Kent Elementary School, was the last school for which the District received state matching funds under the current state funding formula. Millennium Elementary #30 which opened in the fall of 2000 was the last elementary school that received funding approval from voters. Voters approved a $69.5 million bond issue for Capital Construction and Improvements in February 2002. This will partially fund building additions at three high schools which will coincide with moving 9th grade students to the senior high in 2004. The District anticipates receiving state matching funds and utilizing impact fees for the senior high school additions. Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the high school level and unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future. Some funding is secured for additional portables and some will be funded from impact fees. For the Six -Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Facilities Department. Please see pages 25-26 for a summary of the cost basis.• Kant SdW MM Sin Year capital FadUn Plant AO 2004 Page 23 T I VIII Finance Plan -Cost Basis Summary Projected construction cost of the additions to three high schools: Senior High School Additions Projected Cost Total Addition to Kent -Meridian $7,000,000 Addition to Kentrid $13y600,000 Addition to Kentwood $11,200,000 $78,650,000 Projected construction cost of additions to 3 High Schools $31,800,000 For -impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last high school, with inflation factor. Senior High School Cost Projected Cost Kentiake High School (Opened in 1996) $44,600,000 Current cost of High Scholl $62,915,882 Projected cost of High School #5 In 2009 $78,650,000 The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 on page 26 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. Keg Sdwd DMId Sk Year CaPM Fates Mm Mull 2004 Page 25 z4n-E r- 0 it 66 M C m --oma :� J 3 = v m� zy Y o m v O IN► r tND t+7 O N N N S •" O Im o) Cf) N 40IA 1 t0 l'� O O t O �f1 r N OeD� 01 m b N r in 0) O ti NN m m [� a O l�r�1' H y N H S N R3 l+f M HN! H H H H H H W dam! H N H m tM tO0 tO+, g Go 0 V n O N OOD M O 0 C r C N r 4 IA U) lh H 4 O O M M O 4 M l+1 W$ m N A m lN9 N V IS m .m W Y tea+ l a N W N m 1 3 d ou 6 N �p cyry N �iWpA p�O� OW7 p ♦ N U) W co y am N N Pj P N o Q^ !+f o w of yy�� e W g W I k N r r W r r r CO W 1 N r r } 4 LL _ H E F N u9 O1 4 4 r' f0 H 00 H . OOpp cod OD N H N In ONMr� �O M y h tlN! O IN► r tND t+7 O N N N S •" O Im o) Cf) N 40IA 1 t0 l'� O O t O �f1 r N OeD� 01 m b N r in 0) O ti NN m m [� a O l�r�1' H y N H S N R3 l+f M HN! H H H H H H W dam! H N H m tM tO0 tO+, g Go 0 V n O N OOD M O 0 C r C N r 4 IA U) lh H 4 O O M M O 4 M l+1 W$ m N A m lN9 N V IS m .m W Y tea+ l a N W N m 1 3 d ou 6 N �p cyry N �iWpA p�O� OW7 p ♦ N U) W co y am N N Pj P N o Q^ !+f o w of yy�� e W g W I k N r r W r r r CO W 1 N r r } 4 LL H H a H O IN► r tND t+7 O N N N S •" O Im o) Cf) N 40IA 1 t0 l'� O O t O �f1 r N OeD� 01 m b N r in 0) O ti NN m m [� a O l�r�1' H y N H S N R3 l+f M HN! H H H H H H W dam! H N H m tM tO0 tO+, g Go 0 V n O N OOD M O 0 C r C N r 4 IA U) lh H 4 O O M M O 4 M l+1 W$ m N A m lN9 N V IS m .m W Y tea+ l a N W N m 1 3 d ou 6 N �p cyry N �iWpA p�O� OW7 p ♦ N U) W co y am N N Pj P N o Q^ !+f o w of yy�� e W g W I k N r r W r r r CO W 1 N r r } 4 LL KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors - Single Family Elementary 0.482 Middle Scholl 0.161 . Senior High 0.284 Total 0.927 MOMOMMENNOMMMM Projected Student Capacity Elementary 500 Middle School 1,065 Senior High 1.622 Required Site Acreage per Facility Elementary (required) 11 Middle School (required) 21 Senior High (required) 27 New Facility Construction Cost Elementary $0 Junior High / Middle School $0 Senior High ` $78,650,000 • See cost basis on Pg. 25 Temporary Facility Square Footage Elementary 86,956 Junior High / Middle School 26,280 Senior High 21.736 Total 4% 134.972 Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary 1,455,608 Junior High / Middle School 753,079 Senior High 800,882 Total 96% m=w3,009,567 Total Facilities Square Footage Elementary 1,542,562 Junior High / Middle School 779,359 Senior High 822,618 Total 3,144,539 Developer Provided Sites / Facilities Value 0 Dwelling Units 0 Student Generation Factors - Multi -Family Elementary 0.293 Middle School 0.069 Senior High 0.114 Total 0.476 SPI Square Footage per Student Elementary Middle School Senior High Special Education 80 110 120 140 Average Site Cost / Acre Elementary $0 Middle School $0 Senior High $91,851 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost Elementary @ 24 $0 Middle School @ 29 $0 Senior High @ 31 • $91,450 State Match Credit Current State Match Percentage 53.30% Area Cost Allowance - Cost/Sq. Ft. Current Area Cost Allowance $129.81 District Average Assessed Value Single Family Residence $234279 District Average Assessed Value Multi -Family Residence $74,065 Capital Levy Tax Rate/$19000 Current /$1,000 Tax Rate $1.68 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Current Bond Interest Rate 4.35% Kent Sdaoi Distrk:t six -yaw capital Fadmies Plan April 2004 Page 27 A I' KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE i j Slte Acquisition Coat per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Acres x Cast par Acre) / FAY CapecM A 1 (Eiamenlary) 11 A 2 Oddle School) 21 A 3 (Senior High) 27 $0 500 0.482 $0 s0 1,085 0.181 $0 $91,851 $000 2.8 4 $352.16 0.927 C—> $33.51 A $352.16 Pernword Facility Construction Cast per Single Family Residence Fomwb: gFacilty Coat / Facility x Student F x PennanarWratal Squar8 Eo2 Lae Ratio) 0.04 $0 Conahuetion Cod F Student Factor Ratio C—> $33.51 B 1 (Bury) 50 500 0.482 0.96 50 B 2 (Mkkk School) 50 1,065 0.161 0.96 50 B3 (SenlorHigh) 378.650,000 1,822 RM 0.96 $13,220.18 0.927 B —> $13,220.18 Temporary Facility Coat per Single Famgy Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) C 1 (Bert r) $0 24 C 2 (Midde School) $0 29 C 3 (SWAX High) $91,450 31 State Match Credit per Single Family Residence Fornula: Area Cod Allowance x SPI Sauare Fee I Area Cost Alwa res I SPI S4 Ft. / student D 1 (Elementary) $129.81 80 D 2 (Mtddhe School) $129.81 110 D 3 (Senior High) $129.81 120 Tax Credit per Single Fwnlly Residence 0.482 0.04 50 0.161 0.04 $0 U&I 0.04 $33.51 0.927 C—> $33.51 0 0 0.5330 Student Factor % I Student Faclar 0.482 $0 0.161 $0 22$4 $2,357.95 D —> $2,357.95 Average SF Residential Assessed Value $234,279 Current Capital Levy Rate /51.000 $1.68 Current Bond Inbrest Rate 4.35% Years Amortized (10 Years) 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit F / Site Value tkdls 0 0 Fee Recap A = Sate Acquisition per SF Residence B = Permanent Facily Cost per Residence C = Temporary Facilty Cost per Residence Sutdotal D - Sib Match Credit par Residence TC = Tax Credit per Residence Subtotal 5352.18 $13,220.18 $33.51 $13,805.85 $2.357.95 $3.138.63 $5.494.58 TC —> $3,136.63 FC —> 0 TOW Unfunded Need $8,111.27 50% Developer Fee Obligation $4,056 FC = Facility Credit (if appvco*) 0 Not Fee Obligation par Single Family Residence $4,056 Kart School District Sbc Year CaplW Facilities Plan April 2DO4 Page 28 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost pa' Multi -Family Resitfanar Unit Formula ((Acres x Cost per Atxe) /Fades Cspadty) x Studen12=4M Fador�_ A 1 (Bomentaty) 11 $0 500 0.293 $0 A 2 (Middle School) 21 $0 11065 0.069 $0 A 3 (sem M09h) 27 $91,851 2,000 Qd1.4 $141.36 0.476 A $141.36 Permanent Facility Cwwft tion Cost per Mut Wmdly Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / F x Student Fedor x (Perrlarterd / Total Square FootageRatio Construdon Cal F Capacity Student Fader I Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary) $0 500 0.293 0.96 SO B 2 (Middle School) 5o 1,065 0.069 0.96 $0 B 3 (Senior Mgh) $78.650.000 1,622 =A 0.96 55,306.69 0.476 B —>wmG=w Temporary Facility Cost per MultlfamMy Reatdmnce Unit Fomwla: ((Facility Cost / F x 36rdant Factory x gwn= / Total Squans Foftr Ratio) Fadft Cost Faday Capacay Student Fodor I Footage Ratio C 1 (Elanentary) $0 24 0.293 0.04 $0 C 2 (Mahle School) $0 29 0.069 0.04 $0 C 3 (Senior High) $91,450 31 Q -.W 0.04 $13.45 0.476 C —> $13.45 State Match Credit per Muid-Fanlly Residence Unit Farthing Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Foot per student x District Match % x Student Factor Area Cost Agmence I SPI Sq. FL / Student Diatrlct Match % IStuderd Fedor D 1 (Elementary) $129.81 80 0 0.293 $0 D 2 (Middle School) $129.81 110 0 0.069 $0 D 3 (Senior High) $129.81 120 0.5330 0.114 $946.50 D —> $946.50 Tax Credit per MukWaally Residence Unit Average MF ResWential Assessed Value $74,065 Current Capital bevy Rate 1$1.000 $1.68 CumaM Bond Interest Rate 4.35% Years Amortized (10 Years) 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facft I She Value I Dwaft Units 0 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per MWd-FarRy Unit B = Permanent Fadky Cost per MF Urlt C = Temporary Fadilty Cost per MF Urlt Subtotal D = Stab Match Credit per MF Unit TC = Tax Credt per MF Unit Sr�tofal $141.36 $5,308.69 S13A5 $5,481.50 $946.50 $991.62 $1,938.12 TC —> $991.62 FC —> 0 Total Unfunded Need 53,523.39 509E Developer Fee Obligatlon $1,762 FC - Fadilty Credit (it applicable) 0 Net Fee Obligation per Multi -Family Residence Unit $1.762 Kent School Distdd Sbc Yea Capital Fad98W•Plan April 2004 Page 29 IX Summary of Changes to April 2003 Capital Facilities Pian The Capital Facilities Plan (the "PIW) is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the April 2003 Plan are summarized here. Voters approved funding for additions at three high schools to accommodate new growth and moving 9h grade students to senior highs. This will provide additional capacity for grades 7-8 at middle schools in 2004. Kent Junior High will close for remodeling and repurposing in 2004-05 and re -open as a new middle school in 2005-06. Property for Junior High #8 was determined not feasible and is still for sale. Changes to capacity continue to reflect reduction in class size for grades K - 4 as well as program changes. Reduction in class size for Student Achievement Initiative 728 is reflected in this update. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement of portables between facilities Student enrollment forecast is updated annually. At this time, enrollment projections reflect need for additional capacity at high school level rather than elementary level. The district expects to receive state matching funds for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future. The biennial student generation factor survey was updated to reflect changes and grade level reconfiguration. Changes reflected no adjustment for occupancy. Survey data is included as Appendix E. Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors include: ITEM Mme FROM TO Comments Student Generation Factor Elam 0.466 0.482 updated for 9" Grade Single Family (SF) Jr 0.227 0.161 Reomfiguration Sr 0200 0.284 Trial 0.893 0.927 Student Generation Factor Bern 0261 0293 updated for s" Grade Multi -Family (MF) Jr 0.105 0.069 Reconfiguration Sr 0.068 0.114 Total 0.454 0.476 State Match Credit 54.29% 53.30% Per OSPI (-.99%) Area Cost Allowance (Boeckh Index) $125.32 $129.81 Per OSPI Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SF $222,1 $234.279 Per Puget sound ESD AV - Average of Condominiums & Apts. MF $65,437 $74.065 Per Puget Sound ESD Debt Service Capital Levy Rate / $1000 $2.10 $1.68 Per King County Assessor General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 4.69% 4.35% Market Rate Impact Fee - Single Family SF $4,292 $4,056 Change to fee - $236 Impact Fee - Multi-FamNy MF $2,643 $1,762 Cham to be - $NJ Kent School DbM S& -Year CWW FadgNNs Plan April 2004 Page 30 VA Appendixes Appendix A: Calculations of Capacities for Elementary Schools Appendix B: Calculations of Capacities for Junior High Schools Appendix C: Calculations of Capacities for Senior High Schools Appendix D: Use of Relocatables Appendix E: Student Generation Factor Survey Kent SdwW DkW SIt-Yew CapkW Fadi n Plan Apra 2004 Page 31 6 0 0 0 p 0 g g 0 4 a a v 4 o 0 a 9 1 A I A 4 0 a A O A A O O O O 07 0 0 0 O N O O N N 0 0 0 07 N, N, N O O, O ma, O I N I N N I � Q N e 0 N N N N N N, 1A 0 N, N O 'f 0 N 0 O O O R O 14 r O$ e~. N W R W C� O V 9 9 :E O R 0 0 0 �, SRO a " v N N N N N N N N"* f N N 0 N 0 Y N V V, N N 0 N, 0 10AI1919a109111�ffi:IIfaAa§own II N F N o r N N N r N F F F O own v AIL i �1 0 z d Ll +1 �l �t� ■ � 2 I ¥ �M 0 z LU CL b N, § e o o -a co � 0 o 0 o ■ Go n COO* o ■ _ ° 40 $ }B� ` � § / A 2 _ } § ' K ) } ■ ° ° � k B E § � ° ° � o oODa § § to � ) c© do do Ato �B� / � § ) 2 2 2 ® s§ I tƒ $ g � 2 'm Q C � � Ll § � 3 r_ o § q 0 r c § .5 & ■ � 2 I ¥ �M 0 z LU CL b N, § W G 2 W IL LO i• i (n Q�j app pp Qp� pQ� god ly N t Op f N O/ OD O t 1f) A i�1 V Vl N N !7` N �'! �! iV r N N f N N [V N C N N �? O O O 6 d d 17 O O O O G 0 0 0 0 O O C G O G G O G d O G O G C O O O O 0' �p f /NV !p� e Gp Yf YNf C eNV 1mp R E A Q1 17f tD m A RAa� r r r C G r N r r r m C' r r r r N {� C G C C d O O p d G G C G O d O d C O C C G d d d d d C d d O d d d d G C O L m (7 m v W b N f �J l9 f A O, 1 10 Ol y 1t l7 ��f, ' f � "{ ^ A l�'f• 'II' ++ �u l7 �? R O O d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *a 0 0 0 0 d 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 O 0 0 0 0 0 O m 'O A ref n N n N A m Q pry Opl O p A N IH :2 f A 1A N 1ff fff♦6G �' a m �A�, n ci iG vl !0 S O iD is N r O O A 903 r A eD CC W 01 CD b N N aD N m N C1 2 O CjarDDj A A N 0 0 0 0 r r r r 0 0 0 0 0 0 r O O r r 66 r O O r O r O 0 0 0 r �' O r 0 O (n N b pp m 01 fN O iR N N p m ffi O/ �` m OJ N N m N N N A v YOf N r r 10 r co A'1 r r QI N 0 cof � f 0, ch p0� N� N f� r *' h N N C Ln cn O 0— E p O N W W m OI ♦ tD N N �p aD N t'! Y! N eN- ip {�'1 ONE w h N CO r r W f 0 N� OJ A 1D Cl r r r r � ., w W N f� r r r N co tl�p QQ Y N p N O O N r m O m' O N m W by N N i fOO Q N N m e f r r pp 5;pp�� QQ r 01 N N A m Of N m m N �p r r m A F W A rn- N IO N N' A' N r N p f r N r r a, N Q „'C a. a. 'g W J fb W U U U w x aqr m J O J U' 2 2 rxn 0. i� 2 U) x 2r W� O1 9. C & .9 > x 3 m z « YI W y $ Y E co e 3 e r i chi e1 > x aIL m 94 I C � a owe n aR� :{X�i E eooi$�gg O� cm Jile �u ����2R ae' M C%uiwmr'nF33 3 it 0 O@ m aAD M l07 O r f f O W r �p 0 'S m 'C H N (O m a0 �.' 0 100 A 3Y A p y W r r r r r r N r r r r [CC777 r (J W G 2 W IL LO i• i I t l 1 I C C O C C G C O C O G C C d G d 6 d 0' d d d 0 0 d O o 0 0 0 d 0 0 0 d d 4R44NA611!a0014A� LO Ca � � m o g & d d 0 d 0 0 0 0 0 d 0 0 0 0 d 0 ClS o Cd T O Z C C O C C G C O C O G C C d G d 6 d 0' d d d 0 0 d O o 0 0 0 d 0 0 0 d d 4R44NA611!a0014A� LO Ca � � C O T O Z m OI W Yf aD p O 1+ �p N p� N tp M r m A IM O® N m V U$ w � m U.m ~ a ca w r LO m Cli X 0 0 0 O c Z W �c A =n U c Z W H a o 2 J C O W i h a d D i � Y A DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNMCANCE Issued with a 14 Day comment and appeals period Description of proposal: This threshold determination analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the following actions, which are so closely related to each other that they are in effect a single action: L The adoption of the Federal Way Public Schools' 2004/05 Six Year Capital Facilities Plan by the Federal Way Public Schools for the purposes of planning for the facilities needs of the District. 2. The amendment of the King County Comprehensive Plan by King County to include the Federal Way Public Schools' 2004/05 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the King County Comprehensive Plan. 3. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Federal Way and the City of Kent to include the Federal Way Public Schools' 2004/05 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the City of Federal Way and the City of Kent's Comprehensive Plan. This proposal may also involve the amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the Cities of Auburn, and Des Moines to incorporate the Federal Way Public Schools' 2004105 Capital Facilities Plan into the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. Proponent: Federal Way public Schools Location of the Proposal: The Federal Way Public Schools District includes an area of approximately 35 square miles. The cities of Federal Way, Kent, Des Moines andAuburn fall within the District's boundaries, as do parts of unincorporated King County. Lead Agency: Federal Way Public Schools is the lead agency pursuant to WAC 197-11-926. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse environmental impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after a review of the completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public upon request. This Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issue. Continents must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., June 14, 2004. The responsible official will reconsider the DNS based on timely comments and may retain, modify, or, if significant adverse impacts are likely, withdraw the DNS. If the DNS is retained, it will be final after the expiration of the comment deadline. Responsible Official: Telephone: Address: Ms. Geri Walker Enrollment and Boundary Analyst Federal Way Public Schools (253) 945-2071 31405 18th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 You may appeal this determination in writing by 5:00 p.m., June 14, 2004 to Geri Walker, Federal Way Public Schools, 31405 18th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Date of Issue: June 1, 2004 Date Published: June 3, 2004 OA Federal Way Public Schools 2004/05 Capital Facilities Plan Buildingfor the 21" Century FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC scuQOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BOARD OF EDUCATION Ed Barney Evelyn Castellar Charles Hoff Bob Millen Earl VanDorien SUPERINTENDENT Thomas R. Murphy FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL, FACILITIES PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction Inventory of Educational Facilities Inventory of Non-Jnstructional Facilities Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities Needs Forecast - New Facilities Six Year Finance Plan SECTION 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Introduction ' Map - Elementary Boundaries Map - Middle school Boundaries Map - Senior High Boundaries SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction Building Capacities Portable Locations Student Forecast Capacity Summaries King County Impact Fee Calculations SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2003/04 PLAN ii 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12-13 14-15 16-18 19-23 24-26 27-30 i FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC -SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, and the City of Kent Ordinance No. 3260 effective March 1996, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 2003/04 Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2004. This Plan is scheduled for adoption by King County, the City of Kent and the City of Federal Way and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of eac jurisdiction by reference. This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of thk Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date. the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing, jobs, services, culture and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies. Additional plans will be consistent with the six year Capital Facilities Plan. On October 12, 1998 the Federal Way School District Board of Education approved a recommendation to move to a Pre K-5 elementary, 6-8 middle school, and 9-12 high school grade configuration. This new grade configuration began in the fall of 2003. This grade configuration is believed to be more responsive to student needs. It allows for smaller elementary enrollments with room for lower primary class sizes. The middle school provides more developmentally appropriate instruction and a better academic transition between elementary school and high school. Middle schools also allow two- year preparation for the WA State 7a' grade test, and matches most western Washington Districts. With State and District standards becoming even tougher, 9'h grade students need to be brought into the high school environment and given access to high school subject specialist. The four-year high school plan combines the 9-12 graduation credit system, allows two-year preparation for the WA State 1001 grade test, and physically places the high ,school students together. iii FEDERAL WAX PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION (condnuee Federal Way citizens apprggved a bond proposal of $83 million in September 1999. This bond provided for Todd Beamer High School ($44 million); a middle school ($17 million); expansion and improvement of existing schools ($9 million); replacement of Truman High School ($6 million) and other general improvements ($7 million). .Additional planned improvements included in the bond proposal are: parking and pedestrian safety, playgrounds and sports fields, new classroom start-up and music equipment, information systems and networks and emergency communications. Todd Beamer High School opened in September 2003. The school opened with three grades, Vb, le and 11'' Seniors in 2003/04 aro allowed to complete their high school education at the current high school. This does put some strain on capacity at the three existing high schools. In order to accommodate this decision measures to maximize the capacity in the existing buildings were implemented and three portables were added to high school campuses. Capacity for the 2003/04 school year was calculated at 100% usage in order to give the 12`a grade students the opportunity to stay at the current school. Todd Beamer High School was designed with planning offices for teachers; Decatur, Federal Way and Thomas Jefferson do not have designated planning areas. In order to accommodate planning space for teachers, capacity must be calculated at 83% of maximum as planning generally takes place in the classrooms. This 83% figure is used in the Program Capacity calculation for Decatur High School, Federal Way High School and Thomas Jefferson High School shown on page 13. A Middle School Transition Team began meeting in May 2001 to develop recommendations for the middle school programs. These recommendations were adopted by the Board of Education on March 25, 2002. The adopted recommendations include block instruction with 2 teacher teams meeting with about 60 students daily for students in the 6' and 7`h grade. Eighth grade teachers will see 90 students each day. This structure lengthens contact time for students with fewer adults and is believed to develop stronger relationships. Fewer transitions for students will provide continuity to the day and promote a cahner campus. The 2004105 Capital Facilities Plan reflects a reduced capacity to accommodate the middle school block instruction. The facility impacts will require further analysis of capacity as the middle school curriculum is refined Modifications to vocational instructional areas at the middle schools were made in the past.year. These modifications increased the capacity at the middle school level by converting shop areas to classrooms. The increased capacity is noted in the program capacity on page 13. iv FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Federal Way Public Schools opened the Internet Academy in the 1996/97 school year with 60 students. This program currently serves approximately 405 students, 80 are students also served in other Federal Way School District buildings. Additionally the school serves students through the Digital Learning Commons. The number of students served as tuition -based students has increased to approximately 175. These tuition -based students are not included in the forecasts for Internet Academy. The forecast for this school is based on current average annual enrollment. Historical growth has not been a reliable tool to forecast this enrollment. Internet Academy has become a model for providing quality instniction to various locations. Internet Academy is currently operating out of leased space consisting of administrative areas and a computer lab area. This capacity is not included in the analysis of instructional spaces. The facility needs are unique to a program of "distance learners". Federal Way Public Academy opened in the 1999/00 school year in six portables on the Elahee Junior High site. Two additional portables were added for opening the 2000/01 school year to expand the program to include ninth grade students. Federal Way Public Academy has extended the program to serve students in grades 6 through 10. There are currently 286 students in this school. The District purchased a facility for Federal Way Public Academy. The renovation of this building is complete and students moved into the building in October 2003. The portables used to house Federal Way Public Academy are being used for Merit School, the Child Find program, a training facility and temporary instructional space for Hlahee Middle School. As smaller class sizes roll forward into the secondary levels, we anticipate a slight decline at middle school between 2006 and 2009. This does not diminish the need to open a new middle school in the 2005 school year. Middle school facilities are overcrowded at current enrollment levels and portables are considered a temporary solution to this overcrowding. Even with adding seats for 700 students at the opening of the new middle school in 2005, projections based on current program capacity indicates a surplus capacity of only 44 seats: , Another initiative that will impact capacity at the secondary schools is the Puget Sound Early College. Highline Community College is offering this program to 11°i and le grade students at the Federal Way campus. The program allows promising 11`h and 12'h grade students the opportunity to complete their high school diploma and the Associate of Arts college degree in their final two years of high school. In the first year, we expect 60 11'h and 12� grade students to attend the Puget Sound Early College. The district has a cooperative agreement with Head Start for facility use to serve income eligible Pre -Kindergarten students. Currently we house Head Start programs at 3 of our elementary schools. Headstart is building a new facility on the Harry Truman High School campus. This facility will centralize Headstart services in the Federal Way community. The District anticipates expanding the ECEAP Pre -Kindergarten program when Headstart space becomes available in the elementary schools. V FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 1- THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. A Financial Plan which shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization listed follows this. 1 f FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPrrAL FACILITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES 2800 SW 320th Street ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS 98023 Federal Way 30611 16th Avenue S Adelaide 1635 SW 304th Street Federal Way 98023 Brigadoon 3601 SW 336th Street Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 298th Street Auburn 98001 Enterprise 351015th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Green Gables 32607 47th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lake Grove 303 SW 308th Street Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35675 32nd Avenue S Auburn 98001 Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Road Federal Way 98003 Meredith HiD 5830 S 300th Street Auburn 98001 Mkr r Lake 625 S 314th Street Federal Way 98003 Nautilus 1000 S 289th Street Federal Way 98003 Olympic View 2626 SW 327th Street Federal Way 98023 Panther Lake 344241st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368th Street Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 3460012th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Silver Lake 1310 SW 325th Place Federal Way 98023 Star Lake 4014 S 270th Street Kent 98032 Sunnycrest 24629 42nd Avenue S Kent 98032 Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42nd Avenue S Auburn 98001 Wildwood 2405 S 300th Street Federal Way 98003 Woodmont 2645416th Avenue S. Des Moines 98198 MIDDLE SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Academy 34620 9t° Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Illahee 360011 st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Kilo 4400 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 314th Street Federal Way 98023 Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Road Federal Way 98003 Saghalie 3391419th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Totem 26630 40th Avenue S Kent 98032 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Decatur 2800 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 30611 16th Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288th Street Auburn 98001 Todd Beamer 3599916th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Harry S Truman 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS MeritSchool 360011" Ave S Federal Way 98003 LEASED SPACES Internet Academy 320201st Ave S Federal Way 98003 2 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CURRENT INVENTORY NON -INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Developed Property Administrative Building MOT Site Central Kitchen Federal Way Memorial Field Leased Space Community Resource Center ECEAP Offices Undeveloped Prouerty 31405 18th Avenue S Federal Way 98003 1066 S 320th Street Federal Way 98003 1344 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 1300 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 1813 S Commons Federal Way 98003 30819 10 Ave S Federal Way 98003 Site Location 75 SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW — 9.2 Acres 65 S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S — 8.8 Acres 60 E of 10th Avenue SW - SW 334th & SW 335th Streets -10.04 Acres 73 N of SW 320'' and east of 45'' PL SW — 23.45 Acres 71 S 344th Street & 46th Avenue S -17.47 Acres 82 1" Way S and S 342°d St — Minimal acreage 74 3737 S 360'' St - 47.13 Acres (13 acres are being developed for the seventh middle school; 12-15 acres are wetlands) 96 S 308'h St and 10 Ave S —.36 Acres Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. 3 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004105 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS Purchase and Relocate I Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is Portables Impact Fees. The District is formulating mid range plans for facilities needs at some existing instructional facilities. Major renovation or replacement of some existing facilities is being considered. The District is also planning the replacement of some non -instructional facilities. A site is under consideration to centralize many of the non -instructional functions. Buildings to house the transportation, maintenance, food services and administrative functions may be moved to a single location in the future. 4 I FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 200M CAPITAL FACILITIES pLAN NEEDS FORECAST • NEW FACILITIES tri» rAl iLl'1'Y LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS New Middle School Site 74 Anticipated source of funds are current bond issues. 5 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS. 2004/OS CAPPPAL FACILMES PLAN Sk Year Finance Plan NOM 1.7beaesxemevm dybeigMWisatimbCowftCityofFWwrwayadaW*fKentirpactkeacrmLadwiltbs avdbbkforosebydreDiaaietforsymninprommowL Tb6byamedbmmovlMIV3. L wrBmdac® fimmious" of [Wmdm mma&f*resdmwdcqmn&mwLMisyamedbdn mIMM. 3. Thb Is me IMM bahmeofbmd smile. /. Tbme am sore oumehing hods reorvd brrioM Beamer X&ScbW Tana 16dr Sdoed and dm ddtm meshdob bo0dieq. M& b ■ yam ead baba= as 1244. S.Tse osw o9ddlo milord k aaespbk sr mum match foods. 6. Them Good hila wme mW m GOO& 7. Two of mroe prepaW nbs Mm deed in 20M ad dm d&d k projead sod= ebb edeedar yam. These smda repaen So proceeds from terse ares. No od u properda me acdvdy narbamd at dila dme. & lhem me pOo and saes bored moa Immm mrdemtr drnkpm»u Is dm Dirria orm dm nests[ yams. p. Tbees tea rgnmem do =mot movia[ mitt IarbUa ad pmdmsiob sew poroOm The DbuW may ebome m p nMm mew pmubbsindmyam atmwa Thbodwaemay akoiedededmcmofpwdmft ftmpautim FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC KHOOLS 20000S CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 2 - MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools (the District) has twenty-three elementary schools (grades K-5), six middle school schools (grades 6-8), five senior high schools (grades 09-12) and one school serving students in grades 6 -10 for the 2004/05 school year. The Internet Academy serves grades K-12. In June 2002 the Board of Education adopted new secondary boundaries beginning with 2003/04 school year. A boundary committee will meet in the 2004/05 school year to recommend modifications to the elementary and middle school boundaries. The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school, by school type. (Barry S. Tntman High School, Merit School, Internet Academy and Federal Way Public Academy serves students from throughout the District). The identified boundaries are reviewed annually. Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs that affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas. The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School Districts are different. If the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single development. 7 ,,say � ,w "� c:au... � ��u,-�. :.7� � TF� w �fi F�� wl � 111 � �; AM aA Ak 7rio-C 1,; or Li , �l � 7 0 y% 2] . % !� � § a6m4m _ 91 , m 4 FEDERAL WAY PUOLiC SCHOOLS 2004MS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities - The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast - 2004 through 2009 Capacity Summaries King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi Family Units 11 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS MMS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN building Cgpacities This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. The District has identified a Building Program Capacity for each of the schools in the District. This Full Time Equivalent (FI'E) capacity is based on: • The number of classrooms available in each school • Any special requirements at each school In general, the District's current standard provides that the average class size for a standard classoom for grades K through 2 is 20 students. For grades 3-5 the standard is 25 students. In &, 7`s and a grade the standard classroom is 30 students. In sixth and seventh grade the students are scheduled with block instruction and see only two teachers for core curriculum. Teachers at this level see 60 students per day. At eighth grade, the teachers will see 90 students per day. For grades 9-12 the standard class size is 26 students. In the 2003/04 school year, 17 of the 23 elementary schools offer all day Kindergarten. This program does have capacity impacts, as the classroom is only available for one session of Kindergarten for the full day. The program will be expanded to include an all day Kindergarten program in every elementary school. The capacity calculations on page 13 reserve space for an all day Kindergarten program in each of the elementary schools. 12 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004105 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITIES ELEMENTARY BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY Adelaide 416 Brigadoon 470 Camelot 307 Enterprise 339 Green Gables 432 Lake Dollofi' 450 Lake Grove 384 Lalceland 1 4,762 1 Mark Twain 454 Meredith Hill 397 Mirror Lake 339 Nautilus 435 Olyrnpic View 384 Panther Lake 397 Rainier View 405 Sherwood Forest 454 Silver Lake 462 Star Lake 450 Sunn crest 384 Twin Lakes 410 Valhalla 437 Wildwood 405 Woodmont 335 2004 TOTAL 7-3�1 ElementaryAvera a 407 Notes: MIDDLE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY Mabee 799 Kilo 799 Lakota 750 Samjawea 774 Saghalie 694 -Totem 734 Federal Way Public Academy 212 12002 TOTAL 1 4,762 1 *Middle School Average 758 SENIOR HIGH BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY Decatur 1,476 Federal Way 1AS Thomas Jefferson 1,544 Todd Bearner 1,364 Federal Way Public Academy 133 2004 TOTAL 61105 *Senior High Average 1 1,493 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY fI crit School 1 16 1rumen High School 200 004 TOTAL 216 s Federal Way Public Academy capacity is not used in the calculated average. 13 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004105 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Portable Locations The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students until permanent facilities can be built or boundary adjustments can be made. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. It is the practice and philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that portables are not acceptable as permanent facilities. The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for temporary educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. 14 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004M CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS PORTABLES LOCATED AT ELEM301TARY SCHOOLS PORTABLESLOCATED ATbWDLESCHOOLS vanL Illahee Adelaide 3 7 $ri adoon 1 Saca'awea Camelot 1 4 Enterprise 3 Merit Green Gables 1 30 Lake Dolloff 2 Lake Grove 2 Lakeland 2 Mark Twain 3 Meredith Hill 3 Mirror Lake 4 Nautilus Olympic View 2 Panther Lake 3 Rainier View 3 Sherwood Forest 4 Silver Lake 4 Star Lake 4 Sunn crest 1 1 Twin Lakes 2 1 Valhalla Wildwood 4 Woodmont 3 TOTAL 2 PORTABLESLOCATED ATbWDLESCHOOLS 15 PORTABLESLOCATED AT SENIOR HIGHS IILRfIfNYL MTIMIYW_ Decatur DSTRU OK&L eanwcrco"" Illahee 5 Kilo 7 Lakota 3 Saca'awea 4 Sa halie 4 Totem 5 Merit 2 30 15 PORTABLESLOCATED AT SENIOR HIGHS IILRfIfNYL MTIMIYW_ Decatur 5 Federal Way 1 Thomas Jefferson 3 2 TOTAL 9 PORTABLES LOCATED AT SUPPORT FACILITIES MOT T 1 I111a 3 TAL 19 4 HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES e 1 Forest E 1 2 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 20000SS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Student Forecast Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school -building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students. The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are forecast of enrollment for one year, The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level. The Enrollment Master software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment. In November of 2001, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District. The report was complete in January 2002. The model used to forecast next year's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, 16 FEDERAL WAY P[ UC SCHOOLS 2lll M CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county -wide average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections. The report substantiated that for next year, Federal Way expects little or no growth. The long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes in the 5- 19 age group for King County. Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of something else (e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend for the school-age population over time. The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2015. This model produces a projection that is between 24,000 and 26,000 when applied to the low, medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models. Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington. Near term projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by current local economic conditions. The District tracks new development from four permitting jurisdictions. Long range planning assumes a student yield from proposed new housing consistent with historical growth patterns. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school district in the future. 17 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCROOIS 2004195 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections Simplified FTE (K Headcount -.5 FTE; Middle School FTE -.989 Headcount; Senior High FIB =.939 Headcount) Total K -12 Parcae School Year Elementary Middle School Sector Bfth FTE Chau 1997-98 11,123 5,073 4,082 20,278 1998-99 11,480 5,080 4,120 20,680 1.96A 1999.00 11,622 5,110 4,348 - 21,079 1.9% 2000-01 11,640 S,300 4,390 2030 1.2% 2001-02 11,498 5,331 4,415 21,244 -0.f% 2002-03 11,202 5,448 4,405 21,055 -0.9% • 2003-04 9,127 5,518 6,327 20,972 .0.f% P200f-0S 8,988 5,541 6,494 21,023 0.1% P100S-06 8,999 5,510 6,674 21,183 0.8% P2006-07 9,079 $,379 6,785 21,243 0.3% P2007-08 9,317 5,303 4895 21,515 I.3% P200809 91306 5,313 6,882 21,701 0.9% P2009.10 9,636 5,379 61883 21,898 0.9% • M~ re.nQ,r&aa Elemesfarr K-5 MU& School 6-8 h4gh Sehool 9-I2 23,000 Y 6'91 21,000 r 20.000 u s = 19,000 18,000 17.000-- 16,000.- 15.000 7,00016,00015,000 .s Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast A � Illtl� t�lA• tF:;! A H'".]!� Iw.i �� Anti �� 4 � �� _._ _ �� [tda �� w,r ��..u� � s Sehool Year 18 2.5% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% A' 0.0% -0.5% •1.0% © FTE -♦- Percent of Change FEDERAL WAY MX!ESCHOOLS 2004/15 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 41 10 7 All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and Senior High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, middle school, and senior high levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year. 19 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 7.004105 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - ALL GRADES ENROLLMENT Basic PTE Enrollment Actual - - Projected - - CAPACiTY 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2,009 BUMDM PROGRAM 1 288 1 288 288 121,413 288 1 Basic FM Enrollment without Intemet Academy 20,684 120,735 CAPACITY 20,439 20,439 20,413 21,087 21,061 21,035 21,035 Add or subtract changes to capacity ,'$06 >: `, •M .. < H., Deduct Portable Capacity4 } Adjusted Portable Capacity 2,394 2,394 2,394 2,494 2,594 2,594 2,462 Special Education Changes � k.K.� Truman High modemution and expansicn r +' � �, xr 0.'F ar�`{ t�•,". $ Increase Capacity at Three High Schools t " ` k : FFk,<, New Middle Schoolx" : x.`,.. .• Federal Way Public Amdemy k `}"`t t `Y<\a>rtA • : Beamer Hgh SC1C0l IA.t h t r �a ♦ tKJb.W -$' a raki c,',�`a,�,``z $" v ,,xxrran >;>t•,y 'dtcwa •i=Tt r<ti•` '`Tadd v'o- xna 3x�"2xw,.xw0. µ. ;x,v, ow. r36'AV.at ,`b.�a .an.`+ cvl[3 Adjusted Program Capacity -r -2-0743-9--F20,413 21,087 T21,061 21,035 121,035 21,035 ENROLLMENT Basic PTE Enrollment 20,972 121,023 121,183 121,243 121,515 21,701 21,898 Internet Academy Enrollment (AAFIE) 288 1 288 1 288 1 288 1 288 288 121,413 288 1 Basic FM Enrollment without Intemet Academy 20,684 120,735 120,995 120,955 121,227 2,216 21,610 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) 2,394 2,394 2,394 2,394 2,494 2,594 2,462 PROGRAM CAPACITY (245) 1 (322) 1 192 1 106 1 (192) 1 (378) 1 (S75) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY Current Portable Capacity 2,394 2,394 2,394 2,394 2,494 2,594 2,462 Add/Subtract Portable Capacity 1 1 1 1 Add New Potable Capacity w ;$%v.'Y R,4 3.%y VW 2,600 2,402 2,216 1,887 ryo- ;>; ,'$06 >: `, •M .. < H., Deduct Portable Capacity4 } Adjusted Portable Capacity 2,394 2,394 2,394 2,494 2,594 2,594 2,462 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABEI:2,149 1 1 1 1 CAPACITY 2,072 2,586 2,600 2,402 2,216 1,887 20 FEDERAL WAY PQRLIC SCHOOLS 2004105 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUh1MARY - ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS CAPACITY Actual - - Projected - - 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY 9,356 9,330 9,304 9,278 9,252 9,252 9,252 1. Special Education Changes � � � ::�:'< t{hM59y`y,tt2 �<. `• F5<2S +:(' .. � h ; tT }� Program Capacity 9,330 9,304 9,278 2 52 5++yvi2 9ly,2Adjusted 9,252 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 9,127 8,988 8,999 9,079 9,317 9,506 9,636 2. Internet Academy (AAFIE) 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 Basic FIE Enrollment without Internet Academy 9,095 8,956 8,967 9,047 9,285 9,474 9,604 SURPLUS OR (IINHOUSED) 1,450 1,450 1,450 1 1 1,450 1,450 PROGRAM CAPACITY 235 348 1 311 205 (33) (222) (352) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3. Current Portable Capacity 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 Add/Subtract portable capacity f 1 h 1 1 CAPACITY 1,685 19798 11761 1,655 11417 1!228 1098 }. 5 Adjusted Portable Capacity 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1 1,450 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE I 1 1 1 1 CAPACITY 1,685 19798 11761 1,655 11417 1!228 1098 NOTES: 1. Add Programs 2 ECEAP, 1 SBD (Severely Behaviaral Disordered) and 1 Pre -School Program This reduces Basic Education capacity in the school years indicated 2. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 3. Relocatable, Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. 21 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004MS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SWAMARY - MIDDLE SCHOOLS I�i►I� • ,�t�laYl Basic FTS Enrollment Actual - - Pro ed - . CAPACITY 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 BUILDING PROGRAM 92 92 92 92 Basic FTS Enrollment without Internet Academy 5,426 5,449 CAPACITY 4,762 4,762 4,762 5,462 5,462 5,462 5,462 , Tt �x X , 1. New Middle School } •'1 ' yY/L aTR�i v,C�k�£v,�n-+(Y. AP'''Y.}y(..'S.>u-0 �fifupi,(A R f ` k S4>♦ 735 735 Aw 735 �. ^S:»Fw" £C>� #O.S ♦E •k>rv\R iET tYr x�vY r Adjusted Program Capacity 4,762 4,762 5,462 5,462 5,462 5,462 5,462 I�i►I� • ,�t�laYl Basic FTS Enrollment 5,518 5,541 5,510 5,379 5,303 5,313 5,379 2. Internet Academy (AAFTE) 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Basic FTS Enrollment without Internet Academy 5,426 5,449 5,418 5,287 5,211 5,221 5,287 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) 735 735 735 735 735 735 735 PROGRAM CAPACITY 1 (664) 1 (687) 1 44 175 I 251 1 241 1 175 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3. Current Portable Capacity 735 735 735 735 735 735 735 Add/Subtract portable capacity Add new portable capacity >µ ;.y: ' , b ..'` ' ," s • < , Adjusted Portable Capacity 735 735 735 735 735 735 735 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLF 4. CAPACITY 71 48 779 910 986 976 910 N01'".6 1. New Middle School to Open 2. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 3. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. 4. Capacity fen' unhoused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and no planning time in some classroom 22 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SU IIAARY - SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS CAPAC"Y Acxual - - Projected - - 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 1 2009 BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY 6,321 6,321 6,321 6,321 6,321 6,321 6,321 Add or subtract changes in capacity .•nava %. 6,621 6,731 FIN�. � FIN, � i. �n :'2 � 0 `, ori } eT` \,} ✓ 4, Adjusted Program C ty 6,321 6,321 6,321 6,321 6,321 6,321 6,321 ENROLLMENT c FTE Buedlmmt 6,327 6,494 6,674 6,785 6,895 6,882 6,883 net Academy (AAFM E 164 164 1 164 164 164 164 164 c Ed without Internet Academy 6,163 6,330 6,510 6,621 6,731 6,718 6,719 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) 209 209 209 209 309 409 409 PROGRAM CAPACITY 158 (9) (189) (300) (410) (397) (398) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 2. Current Portable Capacity 209 209 209 209 309 409 409 3. Add new portable capacity 1 100 100 1 4. CAPACITY 367 200 20 9 (1) 12 11 Adjusted Portable Capacity 209 209 209 309 409 409 409 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE 1 1 4. CAPACITY 367 200 20 9 (1) 12 11 NOTES: 1. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 2. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily hoose students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. 3. Add Portable Capacity 4. Capacity for unhoused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and no planning time in some classroorr Puget Sound Early College will house approximately 60 of the unhoused students. Federal Way Public Academy may to include grades 10 and 11. This would provide program for additional high school students. 23 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN King, County, the City of Federal Wav and the City of Kent Impact Fee Calculations Single and Multi -Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substantially adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi -family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that district. - STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single-family units and multi -family units. The factors used in the 2004/05 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single family units which were constructed in the last five (5) years. The multi -family yield is derived from an average of other King County school districts. - RAPACT FEE CALCULATION Following the calculations for the student generation factor is a copy of the Impact Fee Calculation for single family and multi -family units based on King County Code 21A and the Growth Management Act. ➢ Temporary Facility Cost is the average cost of a portable purchased within the last 12 months. ➢ Site Acquisition Costs is the per acre cost of the last school site purchased (site 45); this is a negotiated purchase price. Plan Year 2004105 Plan Year2003/114 Collection Year 2004 Collection Year 2003 Single Family Units $2868. $3269. Muld-Family Units $ 905. 940. 24 PLAN Single and Multi -Family Residences Each juris&Ftion that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover aVare of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine le equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substantially adopted by the Ci of Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation actor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new Igle or multi -family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique t that district. -STUDENT ANALYSIS Federal Way Public Schools stu nt generation factor was determined separately for single- family units and multi -family uni The factors used in the 2004/05 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual,generation actors from single fancily units which were constructed in the last five (5) years. The multi- 'ly yield is derived from an average of other King County school districts. - IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Following the calculations for the student g Calculation for single family and multi -family Growth Management Act. ➢ Temporary Facility Cost is the average cost of a months. factor is a copy of the Impact Fee d on King County Code 21A and the ➢ Site Acquisition Costs is the per acre cost of the last is a negotiated purchase price. purchased within the last 12 purchased (site 45); this Plan Year 2004/05 Ian Year 2003/04 Collection Year 2004 Co ction Year2003 Single Family Units $3034. $3269. Multi -Family Units $ 947. V40. 24 d F Ln N O, �d a o LLddd0d �- dddddo d r�" A ri`i�rria W) O Ln N T iZ�': T �- r O r t LL rrrr dCdOC30 00 r od00 C d 2 ;w, 0 r r T j �mp V 0 S g �tpp N 0 N VN 0 r G O G O C Q ia. C h r l7 O m n< Of r �tt�tttt S m O N ^w O O r '/" u°ddodooaodd w iT :f5. E jr z m m m n m m m N N m ` O E ow No z N x ON0nCDm<N0O off N T T z 8°00000000000 Z o�w �Nl7Nr < z 0 s e s a 32 Ln N a o �- dddddo W) O Ln N T N T s O O r 0 0 00 O O C d 2 ;w, s� j �mp V 0 po N 0 g �tpp N 0 N 0 VN 0 G O G O C Q ia. C h r l7 O m n< Of m EOOOOO�S a0m 0 O N ^w O O r '/" w :f5. SO W G t Ln N FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004!105 CAPITAL FACH.TTIES PLAN WACT FEE School Site Aequfaeien Cost: Student Suident Facility Cost / Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Elementary Middle Sd)ool SrIT1gh Sdtod Construction Cost: %Perm Fact Facility rm.1 c, M rnet Elementary Middle School Sr High Student Student Facility Factor Factor Cat/ Cost/ r.n.At„ CFR K4FR IRFR MFR 96.32% $01 4071 0.3138 0.1190 $0 $0 96.32% $18,352,956 758 0.1632 0.0420 $3,806 $979 1 96.32% $46,468,638 1,493 0.1695 0.0530 $5,0811 $1,589 TOTAL. $8,8871 $2,568 Temporary Facility Costs % Temp Fac. Facility Tnt.l CA pt rnet Elementary Middle School Sr High Student Student Facility Factor Factor C;" CFR MFR Cost/ Cost/ CFR MFR 3.6896 $0 25 03136 0.1190 $0 $0 3.68% SO 25 0.1632 "- 0.0420 $0 $0 3.68% $82,1511--2510.1695 `-`- 0.0530 $20 $6 TOTAL $20 $6 State Matching Credit Calculations Boeck Cost/ Sq. FL CA 1h Ch Aont Elementary Middle School New Sr High Student Student State Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ r„r.,,.s, CFR MPR CFR MFR SI29.81 80 0.00% 03138 0.1190 $0 $0 $1z9s1 110 0.00% o.163z 0.0420 $0 $0 $129.81 120 - 59.97% 0.1695 .---� 0.0530 $1,583 $495 Total $1,583 $495 Tax Payment Credit Calculation Average Assessed Value (April 2004) Capital Bond Interest Rate (March 2004) Net Present Value of Average Dwelling Years Amortized Properly Tax Levy Rate Present Value of Reweave Stream kiw�"1a 1 $213,859 _4.35% $1,704,756 $44,571 w4.35% ._ $35_5,293 10 10 _. $L40 $IAO $2,387 $497 Single Family Multi -Family Resideaca Residences Mitigation Fee Svolmary Site Acquisition Cost $ 799 $ 227 Perdmalt Facility Cost $ 8,887 $ 2,568 Temporary Facility Cost $ 20 S 6 State Match Credit $ (1,583) $ (495) Tax Payment Credit $ (2,387) $ (497) Sub -Total S 5,737 $ 1,809 50%LAwd Share $ Z,868 S 905 ct Fee $ 2AB $ 903 26 S" Aequbldon Cods Facility Cost / Acreaste Acre Elementary 0.00 $0 Middle School 21.901 $87,747 Sr High 41.20 $82,733 Sdrod Construction Cad: 1MPACrFEE Student Facility Factor % Perm F J Facility Facility Total -Rd Ft Cost Csna6h Elementary 96.32% Middle School 96.32% $)R,952,5 Sr High 96.32% $46)(684 Temporary Facility Cod: % Temp Fac. Facility Total Sq Ft Cost Elementary Middle School Sr High Student Factor Cosh Cost/ MFR SFR Mn 0.1190 $0 $0 0.0420 $412 $106 0.0530 $387 5121 Student Student Factor Factor SFR MFR 0.31391 0.11 Cost/ SFR TOTAL I $y, Student Student Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Size SFR MFR SFR Cost/ MFR Cost/ MFR 3.68% SO 251 0.31381 0.1190 $0 $0 3.68% SO 25 0.1632 0.0420 $0 $0 3.68% $82,151 25 _... 0.16951 0.0530 $20 $6 TOTAL $20 $6 State Matching Credit Calculation: Boeck Cost/ Sq. Ft. Sq R Student Elementary Middle School New Sr High Student Student State Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ L.rse,.h CFR MFR CFR MFR $129.81 80 0.00% 0.3138 0.1190 $0 SO $129.81 110 0.00% 0.1632 0.0420 $0 SO $129.81 120 59.97% 1695 0.0530 $1,583 5495 Total $1,583 $495 Tax Payment Credit Calculation Average Assessed Value (April 2004) Capital Band Interest Rate (March 2004) Net Present Value of Average Dwelling Yeats Amortized Property Tax Levy Rate Present Value of Revenue Stream �y��atya $213,859 $44,571 4.35% _4.35% 04, $1,7756 $355,293 10 10 $1.40 $1.40 $2,387 $497 Single Family Multi -Family) Residences Residences Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost S 799 S 227 Permanent Facility Cod $ 9,219 S 2,654 Temporary Fatality Cod $ 20 $ 6 State Match Credit $ (1,583) $ (495) Tax Payment Credit $ (2.387) $ (497) Sub -Total $ 6,069 S 1,895 50% Local Share $ 3,034 $ 947 Fee $ 3,034 $ 947 26 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAMAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The 2004/05 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document, based on the 2003/04 Capital Facilities Plan. The changes between the 2003/04 Plan and the 2004/05 ;Plan are listed below. SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACK ES PLAN SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN The Six Year Finance Plan has been rolled forward to reflect 2004/2009 SECTION III - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION CAPACITY Elementary school capacity reflects program changes for the 2004/05 school year. Middle School capacity changes reflect the transition from Junior High to Middle School and Board adopted program changes for the middle school program. Elementary capacity includes space for All Day Kindergarten programs at every elementary school. Building Program Capacities are found on page 13. PORTABLES The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page 15. STUDENT FORECAST The Student Forecast now covers 2004 through 2009. Enrollment history and projections are found on page 18. CAPACITY SUMMARY The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 20-23. 27 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 11"ACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY CODE 21A The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors. The adjustment made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 2003/04 Capital.Facilities Plan and the 2004/05 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page 29. 28 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/05 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2002103 TO 2004/05 Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in student Generation factors between the 2003/04 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2004/05 Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age of the developments and the year placed in the survey. The Student Generation worksheet is found on page 25. SITE ACOUISPTION COSTS The negotiated purchase price for the Todd Beamer ITigh School site was $80,000 per acre. This is the base line cost for acreage. The assessed valuation for the Federal Way Public Academy land was $521,000 at the time of purchase. The calculated cost per acre in the impact fee calculation is a weighted calculation using the $80,000 per acre for Todd Beamer and the assessed valuation at the time of purchase for the Federal Way Public Academy. Federal Way Public Academy is a 3 -acre site. The grade span for this facility is grades 6-10. Middle school accounts for 60% of the cost; senior high is 40%. Todd Beamer. 40 x $80,000. = $3,200,000. FWPA $ 208,600 (40% of $521.500,1.2 acres of 3 acre parcel) Total Cost $3,408,600 Cost/Acreage $3,408,600/41.2 = $82,733 Cost per acre for High School Middle School: 20 x $80,000 = $1,600,000 FWPA $ 312,900 (1.8 acres of 3 acre parcel) Total Cost $1,912,900 Cost/Acreage $1,912,900/21.8 = $87,747 cost per acre SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COSTS Todd Beamer construction costs is $44,500,000. The costs for the new middle school are set at $15,400,000. The cost for Federal Way Public Academy (exclusive of land) is $4,921,594 The Federal Way Public Academy costs are split 60% to middle school and 40% to senior high in the impact fee calculation. 29 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2004/95 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2002103 TO 2004/05 IMPACT FEE Item From/To Comment Percent of Permanent Facilities 96.41 to Report #3 OSPI 96.32% Percent Temporary Facilities 3.59% to 3.68% Updated portable inventory Temporary Facility Cost $79,695. to Average cost of temporary facilities in $829151. the 2002/03 calendar year. Boeck Cost/Sq. Ft $114.88 to Change per OSPI $129.81 State Match 60.91% to Change per OSPI 59.97% Average Assessed Value SFR — Per Puget Sound Educational Service $203,630 to District (ESD 121) $213,859 MFR — $51,340 to $44,571 Capital Bond Interest Rate 4.69% to Market Rate 4.35% Property Tax Levy Rate $1.46 to King County Treasury Division $1.40 30 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Issued with a 14 -day comment and appeals period Description of Proposal: This threshold determination analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the following actions, which are so closely related to each other that they are in effect a single course of action: 1. The adoption of the Auburn School District's Capital Facilities Plan 2004-2009 by the Auburn School District No. 408 for the purposes of planning for the facilities needs of the District; and 2. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of King County, Pierce County, and the City of Auburn to include the Auburn School District's Capital Facilities Plan 2004-2009 as part of the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. The Cities of Algona, Pacific and Kent may also amend their Comprehensive Plans to include the Auburn Schoolk-District's Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. Proponent: Auburn School District No. 408 Location of the Proposal: The Auburn School District includes an area of approximately 57 square miles. The Cities of Auburn, Algona, Kent and Pacific and parts of unincorporated King and Pierce Counties fall within the District's boundaries. Lead Agency: Auburn School District No. 408 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse environmental impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2xc). This decision was made after a review of the completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public upon request. This Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issue. Comments must be submitted by 4:00 p.m., April 26, 2004. The responsible official will reconsider•the DNS based on timely comments and may retain, modify, or, if significant adverse impacts are likely, withdraw the DNS. If the DNS is retained, it•wiU be final after the expiration of the comment deadline. . P Responsible Official: Michael Newman Associate Superintendent, Business and Operations Auburn School District No. 408 Telephone: (253) 931-4930 Address: Auburn School District 915 0 Sheet N.E. . ' Auburn, WA 98002 You may appeal thisi determination in writing by 4:00 p.m., April 26, 20042, io Linda Cowan; Superintendent, Auburn School District No. 408, 915 4s' Street N.E., Auburn, WA 98002. '4• Date of Issue: Aphl 12, 2004 Date Published: April 12, 2004 ♦• AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2004 through 2010 AUBURN SCHOOL DWIRICT "Avenue to Excellence" Serving Students in: Unincorporated King County Unincorporated pierce County City of Auburn City of Algona City of Kent City of Pacific Adopted by the Aubum School District Board of Directors April 26, 2004 Updated 8-28-04 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 408 915 Fourth Street NE Auburn, Washington 98002 (253) 931-4900 BOARD of DIRECTORS Therald Leonard Janice Nelson Ray Vefik Carol Helgerson Craig Schumaker Linda S. Cowan, Superintendent 4"Avenne to Excellence?' Section I Section II Section III Section IV Section V Section VI Section VII Section VIII Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................. Page 1 Enrollment Projections ........................... Page 4 Standard of.8—eMcC .............................. Page 6 Inventory of Facilities ............................. Page 13 Pupil Capacity ...................................... Page 16 Capital Construction Plan ....................... Page 18 Impact Fees ......................................... Page 21 Appendices., ......................................... Page 25 Appendix A.1- Student Enrollment Projections Appendix A.2 - Capital Facilities Plan Projections Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACUT1ES PLAN 2004 through 2010 I. Executive Summary This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Auburn School District (the "District) as the District's principal planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2004. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and Pierce County and within the City of Auburn and City of Kent; the King County Council, the Pierce County Council, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction's respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of Algona and Pacific, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, the Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. The Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the District's specific needs. in general, the District's current standard provides that class size for grades K-2 should not exceed 25 students; class size for grades 3-4 should not exceed 27 students; class size for grade 5 should not exceed 30 students. When averaged over the six elementary grades, this computes to 26.5 students per classroom. Class size for grades 6-12 should not exceed 30 students, with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers. (See Section III for more specific information) The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The District's 2003-04 capacity was 12,883 whereas Full Time Equivalent ("FTE") enrollment for this same period was 13,020.64. The actual number of individual students was 13,702 as of October 1. 2003. This is a 275 student increase from 2002=03. (See Section Vfor more specific information.) The capital construction plan shown in Section VI addresses the additions to the District's existing facilities currently underway and provides for a new high school approved by the voters in February 2003. The addition of two new elementary schools and the acquisition of a new middle school site are needed to accommodate growth. The new facilities are required to meet the projected student population increase to be generated from the large development areas within the Auburn School District. Two areas that have significant impact on the school district are the Lakeland South and the Lea Hill areas of the district. There are other pockets of development that impact the District as well. The Pierce County area includes most of the Lakeland South development and some adjacent undeveloped properties. The City of Kent has an area of approximately 158 acres that was recently sold to developers. The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, Pierce County, the City of Auburn and City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the fiscal impact incurred by a District experiencing growth and development. Section VII sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multi -family dwelling units. The -student generation factors have been generated using the students who actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and multi- family developments constructed in the last five years. The method of collecting the data is with the use the GIS mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County GIS, and to integrate the mapping with student data from the District data system. This method gives the District actual student generation numbers for each grade span for identified developments. This data is contained in Appendix A.3. 3 Auhn Scholl Dist lat Wo. 4os CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2004 m.ovon Me EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CHANGES FROM 2003 TO 2004 Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2003 Capital Facilities Pian that are a part of the 2004 Plan. The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference. Section 1 Executive Summary Updated to reflect new information within the Plan. Summary level list of changes from previous year. Section 11 Enrollment Projections Updated projections. See Appendices A.1 S A.2. Section I Standard of Service A. Increase in English as a Second Language program required 1 additional classroom at the elementary level. B. Increase of 4 Special Education Rooms at the elementary school level. C. Increase of 1 early childhood special education classroom. Scmtion Inventory of Facilities Updated to refled addition of 2 relocatable units at Ualko Elementary School. Section Pupil Capacity Updated to reflect addition of 2 relocstable units at lialko Elementary School. Section VI Capital Construction Pian A. Planning for Elementary#13 project has started. B. Planning for Elementary #14 project moved up and will begin in 2004. C. Updates cost estimate based on current data. D. Planning and construction for Middle School #5 moves into the 6 year window. 3.1 "m Sdad District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 1004 tivough 2010 ! ? iii *it I1'IT,1.1 Section VII Impact Fees CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2003 to 2004 DATA ELEMENTS CPF 2003 CPF 2004 EXPLANATION Student Generation Factors Single Family Consistent with King County Ordinance 11621, Elementary 0.3269 0.2964 Student Generation Factors are calculated Mid School 0.1621 0.1353 by the school district based on district Sr. High 0.1860 0.1503 records of average actual student generation Mufti -Family - _ - — - - - rates for new developments constructed Elementary -0.0901 0.0846 over the last five years. Mid School 0.0221 0.0455 Sr. High 0.0510 0.0533 New Facility Cost Elementary #14 $0 $15,600,000 1 Elementary cost estimates from Architects recent project experience and OSPI facility records. Feb -04 Middle School #5 $0 $30,000,000 2 Middle School cost estimate from recent project experience and OSPI fadlity records. Boeckh Index $114.88 $129.81 Updated to projected SPI schedule.(G. Beck) Match %- State 55.88% 54.191h Updated to current SPI schedule. Match %- District 44.12% 45.81% Computed District Average AV Single Family $195,869 $206,623 Updated from February 2004 King County Dept of Assessments data. Multi -Family $51,516 $52,994 Updated from February 2004 King County Dept of Assessments data using weighted average. Debt Sery Tax Rate $2.09 $2.18 Current Fiscal Year GO Bond Int Rate 4.74% 4.35% Current Bate (Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-04) Sectlon !fill Appendices Appendix A.1- Updated enrollment projections from October 1, 2003 Appendix A.2 - Updates enrollment projections with anticipated buildout w4mcide. Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey 32 Au6um Schod District Na 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2W through sw0 ENti01.LMENT PROJECTIONS The Auburn School District uses a modified cohort survival model to project future enrollment for ell of the District's operations. Table 11.1 Is an extract from the comprehensive projection model foww in Appendix A.2 titled "CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections". This Table shows the anticipated enrollment for the next six years based on the previous 13 year history of the District under the assumptions set forth in the comprehensive projedions, Appendix A.1, and the projection for &WIllonal students generated from the Lakeland South and Lea Hill areas as shown in Appendix A.2. TABLE ASD ENROLLMENT 01102 11.1 PROJECTIONS Oct 2003 04105 05/06 ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 KDG 922 966 994 1018 1039 1051 1056 1 982 1020 1050 1076 1098 1111 1117 2 909 1037 1059 1085 1108 1120 1126 3 996 972 1084 1101 1125 1137 1 143 4 947 1045 1005 1112 1127 1140 1146 5 1018 1001 1082 1036 1140 1144 1150 K-5 5774 6041 6274 6427 6636 6703 6738 6 1111 1075 1039 1115 1066 1158 1155 7 1131 1183 1129 1088 1160 1101 1186 8 1052 1179 1214 1154 1110 1172 1105 6-8 3294 3437 3382 3357 3337 3431 3447 9 1473 1353 1471 1508 1453 1401 1457 10 1249 1469 1323 1431 1461 1391 1330 11 1010 1221 1419 1264 1367 1384 1305 12 902 947 1136 1324 1164 1254 1263 9-12 4634 4990 5349 5527 5444 5430 5355 TOTALS J 13702 14488 15005 15311 15417 15563 15539 GRADES K-12 00/01 01102 02103 03/04 04105 05/06 06/07 K-5 w/K @i/2- 5313 5558 5777 5918 6117 6177 6210 6-8 3294 3437 3362 3357 3337 3431 3447 9-12 4634 4990 5349 5527 5444 5430 5355 K-12 w/K @ 112 13241 13985 14508 14802 14897 15038 15011 Aubwn Sehc d District No. 40 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2004 through 2010 STANDARD OF SERVICE The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County. Pierce County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent Indicate that each school district must establish a "Standard of Servica' in order to ascertain the overall capacity to house As projected student popula w. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage 'capacity" guidelines for computing state funding support. The fundamental purpose of the SPI guidelines is to provide a vehicle to equitably distribute Rate snatching funds for school construction projects By default these guidelines have been used to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population. The SPI gundelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, facility configurations, emerging educational reform, or the dynamics of each student's educollonal program. The Auburn School District Standard of Service addresses those kcal con&bW*/ws that require space In excess of the SPI guidelines. The effect on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation pattern. Conditions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without accompanying computations. OVERVIEW The Auburn School District operates twelve elementary schools housing 5,774 students in grades K through 5. The 922 Kindergarten stud"ts attend 112 days throughout the year. Grades 1 through 5 attend on a full day basis. When converted to a full time equivalence the K - 5 enrollment is 5,313. Four middle schools house 3,294 students in grades 6 through 8. The District operates two comprehensive senior high schools and one alternative high school housing 4,634 students In grades 9 through 12. CLASS SIZE The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the student population. Class sizes are subject to collective bargaining. Changes to class size agreements can have significant Impact on available space. The current pupil/teacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 26.5 students per teacher. Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 26.5 students per room at grades K - 5. At grades 6 -12 the limit is set at 30 pupils per room. The SPI space allocation for each grade articulation level, is= the computed reduction for the Auburn School District Standard of Service, determines the District's capacity to house projected pupil populations. These reductions are shown below by grade articulation level. ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING AND BEHAVIOR AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses nine classrooms to provide for 80 students. The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPI space guidelines. No loss of capacity is expected union population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to total elementary population. Auhtm SdWd District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2004 through 2010 STANDARD OF SERVICE SPECIAL EDUCA71ON RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities. Seventeen standard classrooms are required to house this program. The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space guidelines by ten standard classrooms. The loss of capacity is expected as growth in program Is larger than the total elementary population. Lose of Pennanen Capacity 10 rooms @ 26.5 each = (265) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (265) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the elementary level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Lose of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 26.5 each = (27) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (27) HEAD START The Auburn School District operates a Head Start program for approximately 118 youngsters in six sections of 1/2 day in length. The program is housed at Evergreen Heights Elementary School and utilizes three standard elementary classrooms and auxiliary office space. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Was of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 26.5 each = (80) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (80) EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a pro -school program young children with disabilities below age five. This program is housed at nine different elementary schools and currently uses nine standard classrooms. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 9 rooms @ 26.5 each = (239) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (239) Auburn School District No. 409 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 20" enough 2010 STANDARD OF SERVICE READING LABS The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing -remediation and additional language arts instruction. These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces if available In each elementary school. Four elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available, thus they are housed In a standard classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms C 26.5 each = (106) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (106) MUSIC ROOMS The district elementary music programs require one acoustically modified classroom at each elementary school for music instruction. The housing requirements are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 12 moms @ 26.5 each = (318) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms Q 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity lass (318) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the elementary school level for studats learning English as a second language. This program requires twelve standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 12 rooms Q 28.5 each = (318) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms Qs. 28.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Low (318) SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for eight highly impacted elementary schools. This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade level and do not receive other services. This program requires eight standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms C 26.5 each = (212) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms 0 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (212) ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a seaming specialist program to increase literacy skills for first and second graders. This program model has been created from the 1-728 funds and currently has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms, as well as pulling out students into designated classrooms. The district is utilizing classrooms at eight of the twelve elementary schools. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms Q 26.5 each = (212) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (212) Aubum Sdad District Nm 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2004dwough 2010 STANDARD OF SERVICE MIDDLE SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates two structured teaming classrooms at the middle school level for students with moderate disabilities. One developmentally disabled classroom for students with profound disabilities. The housing requirements for this program are provided in the SPI space allocations. ACCESS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District provides a transition program for students with behavioral disorders. The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses one classroom. The housing requirements for this program are provided in the SPI space allocations. SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level. This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific disabilities. Three classrooms per school (twelve total) are required to provide for approximately 300 students. The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the SPI space guidelines. MIDDLE SCHOOL COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates a minimum of one computer lab at each middle school. This program utilizes a standard classroom per middle school. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for students learning English as a second language. This program requires four standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ROOM UTIUZA77ON The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. SPI Report #3 dated 10/27/03 identifies 151 teaching stations available in the mid-level facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each = Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = Total Capacity Loss (240) 0 (240) 10 Aubum sehod sake No. 40s CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2004 ffiragh 2010 STANDARD OF SERVICE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS SENIOR HIGH COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates two computer labs at each of the senior high schools. TNs program utilizes two standard classrooms at comprehensive high schools and one at Vilest A*wL The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Lose of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 30 each = (150) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (150) ENGLISH ASA SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at both comprehensive high schools for students learning English as a second language. This program requires four standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Lose of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates three atnxtured learning center classrooms for 40 studerds with moderate to severe disabilities. The housing requirements for this program are provided in the SPI space guidelines. SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special education students requiring Instruction to address their specific learning disabilities. The current senior high school program requires fifteen classrooms to provide for approximately 400 students. The SPI apace guidelines provide for one of the thirteen teaching stations. Lose of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 30 each = (420) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity lass (420) PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS Auburn High School Includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center. The SPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity. This space was not intended for nor is it usable for classroom instruction. it was constructed to provide a community center for the performing arts. Using SPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet computes to 208 unhoused*studerits or 8.33 classrooms. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8.33 rooms @ 30 each = (250) 11 Aubum School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2004 through 2010 STANDARD OF SERVICE ROOM UTILIZATIO1!! The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous elective options in special -interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 90% utilization of all avaiiabie teaching stations. SPI Report #3 dated 10/27/03 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the senior high facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 15 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity. 15 rooms @ 30 each = (450) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (450) STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS — -- €LE-MF-NTARX - - -- Loss of Permanent Capacity = (1,776) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,776) MIDDLE SCHOOL Loss of Permanent Capacity = (480) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (480) SENIOR HIGH Loss of Permanent Capacity = (1,390) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,390) TOTAL Loss of Permanent Capacity = (3,645) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (3,645) 12 Adrum Schod DWM No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2004 through 2010 VIVENTORY OF FACILITIES Table IVA shows the current inventory of parmanent district facilities and their OPSI rated capacities. Table IV.2 shows the number and location of each portable unit by school. The district uses relocatable facilities to: 1. provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting. 2. make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique student needs, and 3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on existing physical plants. Coro facilities, (i.e. gymnasiums, restroomc, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc.) are not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population serve by adding relocatable classrooms. Table Permanent Facilities IVA ® OSPI Rete Capacity (October 2003) District School Facilities Building Capacity Acres I Address Elementary Schools Washingon 553 5.40 20 E Street Northent, Auburn WA, 98002 Terminal Park 450 6.70 1101 D Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Dick Scobee 618 10.50 1031 14th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Pioneer 467 8.30 2301 M Street Smabeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Chinook 543 8.75 3502 Auburn Way South, Auburn WA, 98092 Lea Hill 516 10.00 130908 124th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Gildo key 596 10.00 1005 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Evergreen Heights 5I2 8.09 5602 South 316th, Auburn WA, 98001 AI ac 554 10.60 310 Milwaukee Boulevard North,Pacific WA, 98047 Lake View 667 16.40 16401 Southeast 318th Street, Auburn WA, 98092 Hazelwood 648 12.67 11815 Southeast 304th Street, Auburn WA, 98092 Ilalko 657 12.00 301 Oravetz Place Southeast, Auburn WA, 98091 ELEM CAPACITY 6,781' Middle Schools Cascade 902 17.30 1015 24th Street biortbeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Olympic 970 17.40 1825 K Street S Auburn WA, 98002 Rainier 916 26.33 30620116th Avenue Southeas Auburn W 98092 Mt. Baker 913 30.88 620 37th Street Sou Auburn WA, 98002 MS CAPACITY 3,741 Senior M211 Schools West Auburn 250 1 5.10 J 401 West Main Street, Auburn WA, 98001 Auburn Senior Hiab 2,485 18.60 800 Fourth StredNortheast, Auburn WA, 98002 Auburn Riverside SH 1,503 " 33.00 501 Oravetz Road,Auburn WA, 98092 SH CAPACITY 4,238 TOTAL CAPAUR 14,760 14 Aubum Schad DisW N0. 406 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 20041hra+9b 2010 *WWORY OF FACNJM TABLE TEMPORARY/RELOCATABLE 200405 IV.2 FACILITIES INVENTORY 2007-08 2008-D9 March 2004 Cascade ElementaryLocation 2003-04 200405 2005.06 2008-07 2007-08 200&09 2009-10 Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Terminal Park 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Dick Scobse 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Pioneer 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Chinook 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 Lea H01 2 2 4 6 8 6 6 Dildo Rey 8 6 6 6 6 6 8 Ever Heights 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Alpac 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Lake View 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Hazelwood 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 Ilalko 3 5 1 5 5 1 5 5 5 TOTAL UNITS 28 t 30 34 36 36 36 36 TOTAL CAPACITY 742 795 1 901 954 1 954 964 954 Middle School Location 200304 200405 2005-06 200&07 2007-08 2008-D9 2009.10 Cascade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Olympic 0 0 2 2 4 4 4 Rainier 5 6 7 7 7 7 7 Mt. Baker 2 2 4 7 7 7 7 TOTAL UNITS 7 7 13 16 18 18 18 TOTAL CAPACITY 210 210 1 390 1 480 1 540 1 540 1 540 Sr. High School Location 2003-04 2004-05 2006-06 2006.07 2007-08 2008-09 2009.10 West Auburn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Auburn 12 12 12 12 8 8 8 Auburn Riverside 15 15 12 12 8 8 8 TOTAL UNITS 27 27 24 24 16 16 16 TOTAL CAPACITY 810 810 720 720 480 480 480 COMBINED TOTAL UNITS 62 64 71 78 70 70 70 COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY 1,782 1,816 2,011 2,164 1,974 1,974 1,974 16 Aubum School District No. 406 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2004 through =10 PUPIL CAPAC111Y While the Auburn School District uses the SPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from which to determine space needs, the DisbWs educational program requires more space than that provided for under the formula. This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in Section UI, Standard of Service. The District's capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for addilluai space to house its programs. Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new unfunded - facilities and the elimination of the facility that formerly housed the Alternative Jr. High. The combined effect of these adjustments Is shown on Line B in Tables VA and V.2 below. Table V.1 shows the Distict's capacity with relocatable units included and Table V.2 without these units. XI 0 Table VA SPI Capacty Capacity 14,760 2003-04 '2004-05 2005-06 2008-07 2007-06 2008-09 2009-10 W" A. SPI Capacity 14,760 14,760 14,760 16,260 16,910 17,560 17,560 A.1 SPI Capadty-New Elem 650 650 SPI Caped"sw Sr. High A.2 SPI Capac* New MS B. Capacity Adjustments 800 A.3 SPI Capadty-New Sr. HIO 3,795 3,795 1,500 3,795 C. Net Capacity 11,075 B. Capacity Adjustments 1,923 1,870 1,674 1,641 (1,821 1,821 1,821 12,837 12,890 14,586 15,269 15,739 15,739 16,539 C. Net Capadty D. ASD Enrollment 13,702 14,468 15,005 15,311 15,417 15,563 15,639 E: ASD Surplux0etfclt (665) (1,378) (4f9) (42) 322 176 1,000 CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Exclude Aft JH (40) (40) (40) (40) (40) (40) (40) Include ReloceteW 1,762 1,815 2,011 2,154 1,974 1,974 1,974 Exclude SOS 12 3,645 3,645 3,645 3,755 (3,755) (3,755 3,755 Total A4ustments (1,923) (f,870) (1,674) (1,641) (1,821) (1,821) (1,821) Capacity A. SPI Capacty .14,760 14,760 14,7601 16,260 16,910 17,560 17,560 Al SPI CapacRyNew Eiem650 650 A.2 SPI Capacity Naw MS 800 A.3 SPI Caped"sw Sr. High 1,500 B. Capacity Adjustments 3,685 3,685(3,685)1 3,685 3,795 3,795 3,795 3,795 C. Net Capacity 11,075 11,075 12.5751 13,115 13,765 13,765 14,565 D. IASD Enrollment 1 13,7021 14,4681 15,0051 15,3111 15,4171 15,5631 15,539 E. JASD Surpluvftficlt I (2,627) (3,393) ($430) ($196) (1,632) (1,798) (974) ADJUSTMENTS Je AN JH Ad)usknents 1 (3,688)1 (3,685) IJ New faduties shown in 2006-07, 2007-08, 2009-10 are not funded under the current Capital Facilities Plan. 2J The Standard of Service represents 24.95% of SPI capacity. When new fadlities are added the Standard of Service computations are decreased to 22.44% of SPI capacity. Students beyond the capacity are aownodated in norrdessroom spaces (commons, library, theater) as well as rented space. 17 Masan school Dunnet No. 406 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN sesesrouen2ote CAPMAL CONSTttucrlaa K AN The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974 with the formation of a community wide citizens committee. The resrdt of this committee's vYork was pubih6w in the document thled'Guldelus for Devrbpment ' In 1985 the Board formed a second Ad Hoc citizens committee to pick up from the work of the first and address the needs of the District for subsequent years. The work of this committee was published in the document titled Vlredions for the Mews! In 1995 the Board commiesioned a third Ad Hoc citizens Committee to snake recommendations for improvements to the Distries; programs and physical facilities. The committee recommendations are published in the document titled Education /nto The Twenty -Fist Century - -A Community involved.' The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop pians for the Implementation, funding, and deployment of technology throughout the Districts programs. The 1996 Bond proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate technological applications. The 1998 Capital Levy provided funding to further deploy technology at a level sufficient to support program requirements in every classroom and department. In addition to the technology needs of the District the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District must prepare for continued studard enrollment grw*k As stated In their report, 'the District must pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible.' The Ad Hoc recommendation inducted commentary thatthe financing should be timed to maintain Consistent rates of assessment. A proposition vas approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that is providing $8, 000,000 over six years to address some of the technology needs of the District, and (;5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire school sites. During the 1997-98 school year a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Dieringer School Boards to melee recommendations on low best to serve the school popuiatlon that vriil come from an area flat includes a large development known as Lakeland South. Lakeland South is immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the Auburn School DiehicL On June 16, 1996 the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Dieringer Boards of Directors. On June 22, 1998 the Aubum Stool Board adopted Resolution No. 933 authorizing the processto initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 23, 1998 the Dieringor Stool Board adapted a companion Resolution No. 2497-98 authorizing the process to inithte the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from Dieringer to Auburn containing most of the Lakelond South development and certain other undeveloped properties. Development in this area Is progressing at an aggressive rate. In April of 2002, the Board formed a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two items and make recommendations to the board in the fall of 2002: a. A review of the conclusion and recommendations of 1986 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committess related b accommodating high school errobnerd growth This includes the review of possible financing plane for now facilities. b Develop recommendatlons for accommodating high stool enrollment growth for the next 10 yeas I a new senior high school is not WK. This Committee rownin ended the board place the high edwol on the ballot for the fifth time in February 2003. The February election approved the new high ad=( at 6B.71% yes votes. The school is currently under construction and will open to ins Fail of 2005. 19 I MMS*40d0khiclMCL 40s CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN no rwalqh 200 cAMAL ONSTRUCTrnrt PLAN The District is projecting an additional 1881 students within the six year period including the Lakeland and Lee Hill . This increase in student pcpl lation will require the construction of two new elementary schools, and the acquisition of a new middle school site and construction of a middle school curing the six year window. In the Fall of 2003 the school board Oirected the administration to begin the planning and design for Elementary #13 and Elementary #14. Based upon the District's capacity data and awliment projections, as well as the student generation data included in Appendix A.3, the District has determined that approximately elgW*ne percent of the capacity improvements are necessary to serve the students generated from now development, with the remaining additional capacity required to address axisting need. The table below illustrates the amend capital construction plan for the next six years. The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the tads of growth in the school age population. 200390 Capital Construction Pian March 2004 Funded Projected Fund Project Timelines Project as of Coat Source 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07107-08 08-091 0!}10 Mar -04 All Facilitiee - 1998 Technology Yes $8,000,000 6 Year XX XX Modernization I Cap Lev Impact Portables Yes $700,000 Fees XX XX XX Property Purchase New Middle School No $li WO,000 XX Elementary #13 No $1516001000 XX XX XX XX Ian const const open Elementary #14 No $1$,600,000 XX XX XX XX plan const const I open Middle School #5 No $30,000,000 XX XX XX XX plan const const open Bond New Sr. High Yes $58.500.000 impad XX XX XX Fan const I const open J These funds may be secured though local bond issues, sale of real property, impact fees, and state matching funds. The District =w* is not eligible for state assistance at the slernen Lary sdx" level. 20 �3 S am ej 8 G Gi A A A h a � x x pp pp N � v z E i F 11 P§ LL �!l�og�53 8851 IL till I 0) IL 1 DH ! WW LL•LL 11 J w 4 u K I 9 46 N N O N CC it rp V N 0� M N Sb NSA ten, Valj 1 < n W X o hw�♦ lV n{ge q 4 G G *Cb X g ao2R Y r�y N 1Q V NO N y a og n $ g g 'gY af0(00 L1 4 m$ � � M � � N O � f p�p �♦�ry O 0 0 lei O G p m� � x r ry . gyp m ryN w � � b Q N A p M r '♦' M us O N $m C �yi�f Nr � N' r � n be .. dnn� EE LL > ii E C3 K I 9 46 N N Appendix A.1 -Student Enrollment Projections Auburn School District #408 Student Enrollment Projections October 2003 Introduction — The projective techniques give some consideration to historical and current data as a basis for forecasting the future. In addition, the `projector' must make certain assumptions about the operant variables within the data being used. These assumptions are `judgmental" by definition. Forecasting can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the firhue, or from the known to the unknown. The attached tabular data reviews the history of student emollment, sets out some quantitative assumptions, and provides projections based on these numerical factors. The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, psychological, economic, and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection. The logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today, and will be in the future. It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over thirteen years and six years respectively. The results provide a trend, which reflects a long (13 -year) and a short (6 -year) base from which to extrapolate. Two methods of estimating the number of kindergarten students have been used. The first uses the average increase over the past 13 and 6 -year time flame and adds it to each succeeding year. The second derives what the average percentage Auburn kindergartners have been of the live births in King County for the past 5 years and uses this to project the subsequent four years. The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured alter the fact. This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections. Monitoring deviation is critical to the viability and credibility of the projections derived by these techniques. Tables Table I — Thirteen Year History ofOdeber 1 Enrollments — page 3 The data shown in this table is the baseline information used to project future enrollment. This data shows the past record of enrollment in the district on October 1 of each year. Table 2 — Mutorical Factors VA d In 'actions - page 4 This table shows the three basic factors denied from the data in Table 1. These factors have been used in the subsequent projections. The time factors are: 1. Factor 1— Average Pupil Change Between Grade Levels This factor is samotimes referred to as the "bolding power" or "cohort Survival " It is a measure of the number ofpupils gained or lost as they move from one grade level to the next. 2. Factor 2 - Average Pupil Change by Grade Level This factor is the average change at each grade level over the 13 or 6 -year period - 3. Factor 3 — Auburn School District Kindergarten Enrollment as a Function of King County Live Births. This factor calculates what percant each kindergarten class was of the King County live births in the 5 previous years. From this information has been extrapolated the kindergarten pupils expected for the next 4 years. Table 3 —ft2techon Models —pages 5-13 This set of tables utilizes the above mentioned variables and generates several projections. The models are explained briefly below. o Table 3.13 (pg 5) — shows a projection based on the 13 -year average pin in kindergarten (Factor 2) and the 13 -year average change between grade levels (Factor 1). The data is shown for the district as a whole. o Table 3.6 (pg 5) — shows•a projection using the same scheme as Table 3.13 except it shortens the historical to only the most recent 6 years. o Table 3.13A and 3.6A (pg 6) — uses the same factors above except Factor I is substituted for Factor 2. The kindergarten rates are derived from the King County live births instead of the average gain. a Tables 3E.13, 3E.6, 3E.13A, 3E -6A (pg T)—breads out the K-5 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is pmvided for percentage On and pupil gain by grade articulation. o Tables 3M.13, 3M.6, 3M.13A, 3K6A (pg 8) — breaks out the 6-8 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. 4 • Tables 3SH.13, 3SH.60,3SH.13A, 3SHAA (pg 9) — breaks out the 9-12 grades from the district projection Summary level data is provided for percentage !tn and pupil gain by !fie articulation o Table 4 (pg 10) — Collects the four projection models by grade group for ease of comparison. a Table 5 (pgs 11-13) — shows how well each projection model performed when compared with actual enrollments. Data is provided in both number and percent formats for the past 13 years. W / h w N co co �i 1 4CI pAppp {pA{prr�� C A8 gig N O N O q 0 N i M f 2 11 a 8 W A V 2 4 N Ar Ht 111 Cil 1A ail M111kI ail hv; All BOO !� ADO OOq � r d Rat f `.• iii �`'.nX,...J'`"T:t��i:�,�r7.��'kSL'L§'�7,. ' lr x •es Sia �v v Ey, i it `! g�ij�rgy %fie. ` . (+,� K'`A7. �S��tH-�'4, �•`f4s T � ,• :': .c ^„ ' :. -�� . ' . �.' w ', v ' kyr• �: Ol ♦ S Tl cm tt � e �sC-mb '` 1A +`e+7a'Y � qq.� gg gQ ��yy gg gg qq gQ N x.,o � Ff8i3�oLi8%`ag2�8'N� i�Y� • R g �g g lig'Cob oS �r�w QQ�L F. d W / h w N co co �i 1 4CI pAppp {pA{prr�� C A8 gig N O N O q 0 N i M f 2 11 a 8 W A V 2 4 N Ar Ht 111 Cil 1A ail M111kI ail hv; All BOO !� ADO OOq � r d V at $�8�573$g8g$88 FS kx� a � x��u� �kK �exu�R ��RsR�7R�R 7R,1RiR �Rx 3.} <)_ Y tJ •1 t9 t� f `f `R 'f � 'f � 'f 'f f `f f �f 'f 'F � !! !1 �'! 'f h PI !1 M Pl !J 3 b to ii O Q P 00 O O q 4 b pup INY F ( s2poy pp Nb(� e�J b fq(1� Dnp b q app ap r spy �Ay o_ !y �fy pN Yf O '�/ �"1 lV O A A^N W 9Y W O {o'; O Pl ON�y OO Opp br�jj O ♦r+� .�N7j �O�}} �«-.0-� �ti N/f4 lV NIV N NMN NN�N H �V� ii--- IZY p an ♦ ppp10 • IO 1 b P O� ^ O O O f 'rt b10 p O O lY �0 O A e6 h I of bff A 14. ap 8 ,{ eepp O gg gpp fO rg N w e� of 1y� g O e�6� ♦ g w P �O 0 � ' e � 0 � ti � O N T � � 0 � 'R � 0 0 �D � aAia� ii tl e+l 'pt, O O � b » ba qz pAa m a9 Ml !7 G O .^ N L"T N al aJ tl 't A A 1D W f f O f f 'f f Y �f f w r Yiv T ' 10 , rivi�aeibt c�Ao 16fOawuwlJ�0e70 :s ��1aa N N n' K� CCCCCV77777 �' w w r'� r r r w w r r r w r r r r w Y r w r r r r r r r � w V at $�8�573$g8g$88 K� 0 3 .i •': rAC�POR�N �:�� •,• N LL V at g�oCpprr � R(�f y. 0 16f M10O�tlwrq O O 0000 O N r �O Fr Q� � r rrr r r r r pOJ�r�� SQ r N Q KO mw /IDA�r�O � li III F 1 B If Op app 1--N r V N N r T f w � O O O O O� '� iR a O yo p $1 c p p p O pN O lr !rl r fr � fr r � OK OO! fY r O GO ♦y Wp E� �rpDp e8P r .Tt r o r r r n♦ r �, o a T r F r G r N r n r A TO r aI+ rl nm r u rD r r ONO � � +� r r 1� r Tg T T r r r r r {4� w i r Q' et LL r r r r F r r r T r r T r r p 8 T p T w O O pp O w O O r 7R w r N o pp ID N O oo b O � l7 C r P r T . w . r r F r P T r 6� R m �wD ppN r apIppp p� pAp h p10 O pF� 0 5 O r O S N N 0 0 $g w O�♦p p O g rr yp� 0p r� O O O A in O �. N b p' iR r � a r a 0 0 O O O O o$v11 t R � on n q'Cen!��pj � t7A nF3 v O NA $0o833,TpifB ONO Aw�� TVie V r 101��N �eTi w ��o�g �1d�O�OO�a�OM1 T T r r r r r C V G 9a�o$o�o?�Rxa r r r T r T T r r C r r F r r r r T P r O r p r r A r A T r r r r r $�oSai�aio�'t3.�°rr•Nw.����' r�g��$o���9��R���g SQ r N Q KO mw /IDA�r�O � li III F 1 B If I u a '8 as Ileg r Y T r r 9_7 O R P 3 T w Y T Y BS P p �Pmp T T rp r T r P r � rpp r T r r r r r r r allax,ngf r 7 r 0aw r w r r T r f 93f a?�f T r wp y r oiai3S73tri'iti�08�o�S`�Pw a r 1 1g r � wp r w P Y Y Y - O� 0 M19- O f l aij A T 8' a s g p T P T r w w r r 1! P x- N�nenonoaf��1=d o� [firOJEO VOoKwag—"; a r T T r ►- T 88TTT O g u m: �. oSgg� "'i TTTTT T TTTTT a TTTTT 8 gas $18 N TTTTT T T T T T T T TOTTN � TTTTT 8 T T T T T l7 AN m p t� ties, •u T T T T T T O = m 6 0000 !@fit TTTTT oil Q i'9I O'NWf'b lir til a T �$I b T T $ N gay T AO r O� T T T Hill 111531 4� 5 Mali g 3 n g T tV eO Y IDLI II5M 46-NWfp s z T I T T T T a8�6 o W we T T T T Tg T T T T T T T T T T r��gax as �gggpin wt:er� in O W r o w in w e T a 2 �s $o�• m N N T T T N Ii 7R m T O' T T r T O rnh� aasoo��� T T T 7R e b aT WHO � � T o T T - - T S T T r T O yQT ei GG T.N-O� T r T Is Is �d p o w m e 0 T T T T a8�6 o W we T T T T Tg T T T T T T T T T T r��gax as �gggpin wt:er� in O W r o w in w e T a 2 `, F c O O 2 U) z z m i age vD;Fp. .......-ems.- -� ^ri'sFi m gri �I a �4:0r o� C3. n r- i �g�7G i5 o�ilr age vD;Fp. .......-ems.- -� ^ri'sFi m gri �I a �4:0r o� C3. n r- i I 11 Ii I P- .11 011"neg4ld lge� aEEr x 1 ;; 00 T w f O x N N N o T o 0 Igoaa-q a Olga vt R o eoeo Im T 28" 4� r N r N v FIPv 6 coeo ISO xxxx v�0;C4 wr T R e s ^ e irk 000� T a&on a�o2 T O � 16 �E�j V<WO 1t T E FF5 x 1 ;; O e O O T n o p n r 1IC f N N N xxxx S T a all 1 vt R o eoeo 1912 T gas r N r N v FIPv 6 a xxxx v�0;C4 wr T R e s ^ e irk x a&on a�o2 T T v N In x x*1x �$ sin T O T O T �we�w n 1IC �lYf r! S T a all 1 1912 T gas w g O O a xxxx v�0;C4 T R e s ^ e irk x a&on a�o2 T v N In tt� w O s tl M 94- ;;!! FrEr a T N T C a. W oo QT R y A A A r � iSa�Tq RT wlaT 1113 V V v T T A ^ A N T V V V T '° o • w n � n r lobA K �oe�e�J Apm T V V T r oo �p�Aoo A Ao r 175�i1V N N r V V r py �uV} T x�x w n r vvy p eV NV � T ` Y v w T Noggin tpS - 1111 wwww T r iZEE a T N T C ui�a.r QT R y A A A r al 1113 V V v T T P. 100 T T T V V V T Ap A A r lobA H lV T Apm T XQ T r oo �p�Aoo A Ao 175�i1V N N r �g4.0 r xa�alie, x�x w n vvy p eV NV � T ` Y v r T T T T T r y A pA A N CI a T N T C ui�a.r QT R r V V v T T P. 100 T T T r H lV T Apm T XQ r {3 T lV r T �g4.0 r x x�x w n 0 0 0 0 w T A v r am N NotrZ' a T N T C z o. x x� �� n o < o000 < xaYX A I�1 J{ V n V n J T < Y V V P AAA/' V V r i y /VAAA x$Ptciei, �g�xx 1- W wp N v f yytt� yc 7R so�o A if VE o sAA' s N H I 111 alla Fur < ;E r x x� �� n o < o000 o 1 0., W v V 4 < P F 4 f V V r i y /VAAA x$Ptciei, �g�xx 1- W wp N ae n H yytt� yc 7R so�o d�riwwr VE o sAA' s N F I 111 alla Fur r M C. v N gj w ti d n � r F ei e4i x x� �� n o < o000 o 1 0., W T eAqeq V V r i y r x$Ptciei, �g�xx W wp N ae n H :e IMI d�riwwr VE o sAA' s N I 111 alla Fur r M C. x x� �� n o < o000 o 1 0., W V V V r i y }j pApAA R it N .. N rA �A T ae n F- :e IMI 00 0 0 T I O 'O Ulf N F M e T R Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections WIN q A V r A M ark b r Yjh W � a Y p W T O W coo 0 0 0 0 0! M� m� O ^ cn T � 0 am q N I r wN 000 0000 �p�ppppp O tiA IIVV � � N�I+CO� coo O 00 O Ua O hn S y� V W $�/� {+� 000 O 00O Q R m'I�� T{ M N $ t0 h tO MMS [0U NNreM-- r M N h�+ T s *- 100 h N Wr W com M h N g �'OhN `gvaoC tp N N p000�Q p W h��O QN a- ►� 0 �'� p NN r? O N ( I v w .- 10 t N 0 co S O 'Nf 0m i a O N � O n A N o r SO IV � O� N T.. a sam 94 IIYY 94N Y eD d Y Y��b di Y Y tb Xm cc cm O CSI R LL W r • cm L VA 21 IN o l U) J 1 F V i cl ` � OOiehiv����agm�vNT g cottq O r• r r r T T T T r T r T T T it N ipp� 2E �j+ 3t C7 N tD Cf T T W A tp h �p N M CV lD l7 t�7 �0' V'MMI�fhY'l7N h yrp xavw:Itww:r:wwwrn T T T T T T T r T T T T r T {+ ref mWppCP-4 �tS MONm rNNNNNN N Vz+fT /D ap h .^• q hp. Af�rclo N 'C'o- Q V'YR�OWV �Kftrp fO � _ N w g T r N pf O O Cm OI��O p N O a N N O A � iii M F' O G G � J4BAA IL (Led. 4**** pi�il�ORx'►�tl ���qq lx►�O A I. I- p A h O W 1 0 M; h hlzlr f�AAe�h�T pp p ID ®�O_nn s Q$l a^ r IL SAS O O imp rT e0`vrr T N `-N0v001.-ma�; r� g s : N N g cottq g g n 3Z it ipp� 2E �j+ 3t 2E ip� xavw:Itww:r:wwwrn N ap wm$ 'C'o- Q e OI��O O a N N O T O Or ID M r � aIm g s : N i1 t.ItO Gila h v .� s ► T g � Epp f 0 m A p CD b. 4) O M [�j'i��y pp r ab'���f$ a h O O r N O'O r OiV A O V �°! W m R sr pI Q�Of00OION '0,M �h r IIS M S N b r-CCDT O Pj T f Q Sao S O O O 0 2 b O f Q N N r 'O O �O SCp eq a W o r- p �S T a� O C� b� Y pQ p Y a ,Ml'(� `D CO �Typ T TI COO T T ! r N �MQT f Y N Mil iffOMCD 6f C r TN r T h N Pil 0 T r T T r T r T r r r T ! r �O �N�Q��OnO@CDN O r r r r r r r r V N CCC!!! N t-,Dmms as Oro R12 r T r r r T r r r r r r r N N CN4 to O � Q T r r r r r It I r kkkJ44YYYY[!! r T r T r T P T T r T r Ca a Ht��pp� t{p� Cpp O QOrrOrO��V�e7 r r r r T T r r r r r w r qQqQ11 a pp�� IpsmC7 N pp�hN�C9 BOO]] OO OOrN Vl'7Yr r r r r r r r r r r r r N Y! Cyt OP Yy>prO lf�Cf@ wry^ m O O O O 21 0 iN V a N a NCD�� Pao O r r f N 0 r r r r r r r Cl eC grNCl7 WtDPmw�rC4 Q t7 Y Z v1F r @rro(pV?w Oa@O O1Qat N NNNNrptC CO N r r r r r r r r r r r Y N_ a r - N d t` list.- m 2Tto- Co��tO [O Y ��pp pp g'G+rr r r Or w N o �p op �An � Cf OIAN IQyOCDe^- OOOOOrOrNtpM ah rrr T r r r r rrr r r _a y�p �43D 29984 �pprr W8CDrN C) a 08 9-P - N a� w two P CO C l09nQ r- or ro�fN o T P r rrr r• ,N C-3 't to 0 A Co o0� Mrs 49 a� �� is ® r 0 I W O r r r r♦ Q r r r r r r r r r r A � bV m�p �pp '�y SgtoopOrrOr0�1OVNC7 r r r r r r r r r r r r N a S O S O Vol N AY M Y Sr r r r T r r T r r r N � 00 WOOOr rrr.+ O r r Y N O r r T r r r r �rN MYlq mA/pW^� Y 'CO A 0 V et r (y Iq r r (V Orr r N r Ep Y C? r r r r r r rrr r O~coN SOI to 0O3O �fl Orr r r r N Yl Y 7 lV (r IA W S S h 0 QD !'O N p rpy Q A 0 0 O r r r r r In rrr r rrr rrr r r ML g Q N S h R a t, O O ti pf O r r r r N �— r r r r r r r r r r r ! W MOM p A v M O r �} rA W M OSNNppCDr(p 0 0 0 0 r O r N n M M O r r r r r r r r r r r r * 0 0 x 0 O O p r r r r r r rrr r V �y r r r rrr( rNMv NtDA/OW��� e a -K 5 L~ c $ E X14 imIn* IV Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey I R �G m a LL P X O 0 01010 AOApOpppD <co 0 0 0 0 ��$V -r� V- r r t^ occoodddd fn 2 W M N let' f Q N �� N�Ae► � v Sc'>oocsC;CA 01���eLM►71ao��It�Npp If�SfD000�0 W a0t� W0 � �a o O C C C C CW C o W O F �- (O N. e- et ►p P M H S NNl.-M1AM WQ9l1� lV � �Oc9 V- MMMMaD� �- F a LL P X O 0 01010 0 0 0 0 0 tO fn 2 W M N let' f Q � v mOM W a0t� �a M 2004 Under Construction Name 2004 Auburn School District De,E bpywt Growth sk" 1/10 Parcok Elem I Middle I HS I ToW .v.w