HomeMy WebLinkAbout3636ORDINANCE N0.�3 6
AN ORDINANCE of the city council of the city of
Kent, Washington, amending the city of Kent
Comprehensive Plan as follows (1) to change the plan's
land use map designation from Single Family, one (1) unit
per acre (SF -1), to Single Family, three (3) units per acre
(SF -3) for property located at South 216th Street and 46th
Avenue South (CPA -2002-2(B)), (2) to change the plan's
land u se in ap d esignation from S mgle F amily, t hree (3)
units per acre (SF -3), to Single Family, six (6) units per acre
(SF -6) for property located at 20129 92nd Avenue South
(CPA -2002-2(D)), (3) to amend the Capital Facilities
Element of the Comprehensive Plan to include the Capital
Facilities Plans of the Kent and Federal Way School
Districts (CPA -2002-2(E), and (4) to amend the Capital
Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to reflect a
six-year plan for capital facilities projects (CPA -2002-2(F))
WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act ("GMA")
requires internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements and the plans from
other jurisdictions, and
WHEREAS, to assure that comprehensive plans remain relevant and up
to date, the GMA requires each jurisdiction to establish procedures whereby
amendments to the plan are considered by the city council (RCW 36 70A 130(2)), and
limits these amendments to once each year unless an emergency exists; and
WHEREAS, the city of Kent has established a procedure for amending
the Comprehensive Plan in chapter 12 02 of the Kent City Code, which sets a deadline
2002 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
of September 1st of each year for submittal of requests for comprehensive plan
amendments, and
WHEREAS, by September 2002, the city received four (4) applications
to amend the comprehensive plan's land use plan map designation, and those
applications involve parcels located at. (1) 26922132nd Avenue Southeast (CPA -2002-
2(A)), (2) South 216th Street and 46th Avenue South (CPA -2002-2(B)), (3) 9119 South
192nd Street (CPA -2002-2(C)); and (4) 20129 92"d Avenue South (CPA -2002-2(D)),
and
WHEREAS, the parcel at 26922 132"d Avenue Southeast is currently
designated Single Family Residential, six (6) units per acre (SF -6), and the applicants
are requesting a plan designation to Commercial (C) (CPA -2002-2(A)), and
WHEREAS, the parcel at South 216th Street and 4e Avenue South
(4412 South 216th Street) is currently designated Single Family Residential, one (1)
umt per acre (SF -1), and the applicants are requesting a plan designation of Single
Family Residential, three (3) units per acre (SF -3) (CPA -2002-2(B)); and
WHEREAS, the parcel at 9119 South 192nd Street is currently
designated Single Family Residential, three (3) units per acre (SF -3), and the applicants
are requesting a plan designation of Single Family Residential, eight (8) units per acre
(SF -8) (CPA -2002-2(C)), and
WHEREAS, the parcel at 20129 92"d Avenue South is currently
designated Single Family Residential, three (3) units per acre (SF -3), and the applicants
are requesting a plan designation of Single Family Residential, six (6) units per acre
(SF -6) (CPA -2002-2(D)), and
2 2002 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
WHEREAS, the Kent and Federal Way School Districts are requesting
amendments to the text of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to
reflect proposed changes to impact fees (CPA -2002-2(E)), and
WHEREAS, the city of Kent Finance Department has submitted
proposed amendments to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to
identify a six-year plan for capital facilities projects, including costs and revenue
sources (CPA -2002-2(F)); and
WHEREAS, the city of Kent Land Use and Planning Board considered
the requested comprehensive plan amendments, conducted a public hearing of the same
on January 27, 2003, and made the following recommendations (1) the demal of CPA -
2002 -2(A), CPA -2002-2(B), CPA -2002-2(C), CPA -2002-2(D), CPA 2002-2(E), and
CPA -2002-2(F); and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments of CPA -2002-2(B) and CPA -
2002 -2(D) are consistent with the standards of review for comprehensive plan
amendments outlined in section 12 02.050 of the Kent City Code; and
WHEREAS, on March 4, 2003, the city council for the city of Kent denied
the comprehensive plan amendment CPA -2002-2(A) to amend the comprehensive plan
designation for parcels of property located at 26922 Ofd Avenue Southeast; and
WHEREAS, on March 4, 2003, the city council for the city of Kent
approved the comprehensive plan amendment CPA -2002-2(B) for the parcels of
property located at South 216`h Street and 46`h Avenue based on new information
provided by the applicant through testimony from Habitat Technologies that the subject
site has the status of being a prior converted cropland, and
3 2002 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
WHEREAS, on March 4, 2003, the city council for the city of Kent
denied the comprehensive plan amendment CPA -2002-2(C) to amend the
comprehensive plan designation of parcels of property at 9119 South 192nd Street, and
WHEREAS, on March 4, 2003, the city council for the city of Kent
approved the comprehensive plan amendment CPA -2002-2(D) to amend the
comprehensive plan designation of parcels of property located at 20129 92nd Avenue
South, and
WHEREAS, on March 4, 2003, the city council for the city of Kent
approved CPA -2002-2(E), the amendment to the Capital Facilities Element to reflect
changes to the Federal Way School District and Kent School District Capital Facilities
Plans, and
WHEREAS, on March 4, 2003, the city council for the city of Kent
approved the Capital Facilities Element amendment CPA -2002-2(F) to reflect a six-
year plan for capital facilities projects; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS
SECTION 1. -Amendments The city of Kent Comprehensive Plan
adopted by Ordinance No 3222, as subsequently amended, is hereby amended to
establish new plan designations for the following parcels
A. For the property located at South 216"' Street and 46th Avenue South, from a
plan designation of Single Family one unit per acre (SF -1) to aplan designation
of Single Family three units per acre (SF -3), as depicted in the map attached as
Exhibit "A" and incorporated hereby by this reference (CPA -2002-2(B));
B For the property located at 20129 92nd Avenue South, from a plan designation
of Single Family three units per acre (SF -3) to a plan designation of Single
Family six units per acre (SF -6), as depicted in the map attached as Exhibit `B"
and incorporated by this reference (CPA -2002-2(D)
4 2002 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
SECTION2. - Amendment. The Capital Facilities Plan element of the
Kent Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to include the Capital Facilities elements
of the Kent and Federal Way School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit "C" attached and
incorporated by this reference (CPA -2002-2(E))
SECTION 3. -Amendment The Capital Facilities Element of the City
of Kent Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to reflect a six-year plan for capital
facilities projects, as set forth in Exhibit "D" attached and incorporated by this
reference (CPA -2002-2(F))
SECTION 4. - Severabilaty. If anyone or more sections, sub -sections,
or sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision
shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same
shall remain in full force and effect
SECTION 5. -Effective Date This ordinance shall take effect and be in
force thirty (30) days from and after the date ofpapage as provided
ATTEST
CITY CLERK f
APPROVED AS TO FORM
TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY
C
MAYOR
2002 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
PASSED --ZL day of '' 2003
APPROVED —/eL day of !?A� 12003
PUBLISHED Z Z day of,& 2003
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No 9 passed
by the city council of the city of Kent, Washington, and approved by the mayor of the
city of Kent as hereon indicated
h -w+ e4/ (SEAL)
4ACQMR, CITY CL RK
i?/1/lato.4
P ACmWrcbn c ComPPle =W 2002 doo
6 2002 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
9
cn rtn Tg .�3 �
O 0
m "rt ci cO° s
m v
ori o N m " d 9
m ID
O O .�
N t N
m
ao H
A
CL
EXHIBIT "A"
Ma
; c
mem.
Fdµ
N
a �.
O
O
O
cn rtn Tg .�3 �
O 0
m "rt ci cO° s
m v
ori o N m " d 9
m ID
O O .�
N t N
m
ao H
A
CL
EXHIBIT "A"
Ma
; c
N
a �.
O
O
O
O
;
OOIN
343
nremx'iFl
f
13
" Al"A
O n
m
m
C o
z
A
N
N �
O
O
W to
CD
��^
"
-n
f
13
" Al"A
EXHIBIT "B"
y
��^
gng
-n
0
o
K 0
y °'
"
o.0
T
eOr
'O
r
O O
7 eOr
H
7
0
fD
A
O
FAm
CO
in
Q
Q
E
$Ul
"
m
N
N
706
O
,
EXHIBIT "B"
EXHIBIT C
et.
i
ttl' h;
iI t
nit na
s PG"t
IYa
Emerald Park Elementary Sne Emereld Park Elementary School
Emerald Park Elementary
Serving unincorporated lqy County
Kent, Covington, 4u6urn, Black Diamond, Renton, Sea7ac, Washington
Aprif2002
Kent romeni nistrict
12033 SE 25e Street
Kent, Washington 98031-6643
(253) 373-7000
SIX-YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2002-2003 - 2007-2008
April 2002
BOARD of DIRECTORS
Bill Boyce
Sandra Collins
Scott Floyd
Mike Jensen
Linda Petersen
ADMINISTRATION
Barbara Grohe, Ph D.
Superintendent
Daniel L. Moberly
Assistant Superintendent - Business Services
Fred H. High
Executive Director of Finance
Margaret A. Whitney
Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources & Special Services
Carla Jackson
K - 12 Executive Director, Kent -Meridian
Gwen Dupree
K - 12 Executive Director, Kentlake
Merri Rieger
K - 12 Executive Director, Kentridge
Janis McBrayer
K - 12 Executive Director, Kentwood
Gary Plano
Executive Director of Instructional Services
Valerie Lynch, Ed D.
Executive Director of Special Services
Donald Hall
Executive Director of Information Technology
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Apnl 2002
School OIS111cl
in
Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan
2002-2003 - 2007-2008
April 2002
For information on the Plan, please call the
Finance & Planning Department at (253) 373-7295
Capital Facilities Plan
Contributing Staff
Gwenn Escher-Derdowskl, Forecast & Planning Administrator
Cover Design by Debbi Smith
Maps by Jana Tucker
Joe Zimmer, Special Protects Accountant
Bonnie Catton, Transportation Department
Fred Long, Interim Director of Facilities & Construction
Karla Wilkerson, Facilities Department
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2002
t y l Ssz
Y
IS yt SSS f .B Y S SSS ,t�if S. S,. St
t S e Isltin+' rnS° SS�i;�� SSjS SS I S
{tS
Six Year Capital T'acilities Flan
7aMe of Contents
Section
I Executive Summary
I I Six -Year Enrollment Projection
III Current District "Standard of Service"
I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools
V Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan
V I Relocatable Classrooms
VII Projected Classroom Capacity
VIII Finance Plan, Cost Basis and Impact Fee Schedules
I X Summary of Changes to Previous Plan
X Appendixes
Kent School Distnct Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan
Page Number
2
n
11
14
17
f%3
23
30
31
April 2002 Page 1
I Executive Summary
This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Kent
School District (the "District") as the District's facilities planning document, in
compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act,
King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and
Black Diamond This annual plan update was prepared using data available in
the spring of 2002 for the 2001-2002 school year.
This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the
Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document
for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long
Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account
a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities,
and other needs of the District as may be required.
Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by
Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn and
included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of
each jurisdiction The first ordinance implementing impact fees for the
unincorporated areas was effective September 15, 1993
In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent
School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a
fee -implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the
incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn
must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances This Plan
has also been submitted to cities of Black Diamond, SeaTac, and Renton.
A financing plan is included in Section V I I I which demonstrates the District's
ability to implement this Plan.
This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order
to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. While the State
Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for
capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs in the
District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and
ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service
based on specific needs of the District.
This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District.
The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as
"impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower class size at those
facilities. Relocatables in the capacity calculation use the same standard of
service as the permanent facilities. (See Section i r I for more specific information)
(continued)
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Pian April 2002 Page 2
I Executive Summary (continued)
The capacities of the schools in the District are calculated based on this
standard of service and the existing inventory, which includes some relocatable
classrooms. The District's 2001-2002 program capacity of permanent facilities is
24,559 which reflects program changes and the reduction of class size to meet
the requirements of Student Achievement Initiative 728 Relocatables provide
additional transitional capacity until permanent facilities are completed.
Kent School District is the fourth largest district in the state. Enrollment is
reported to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) monthly
on Form P223. Enrollment on October 1 is considered to be the enrollment for
the year P223 Headcount for October 1, 2001 was 26,377 P223 FTE (Full
Time Equivalent) enrollment for October 1, 2001 was 25,332 98 (FTE reports
Kindergarten at 5 and excludes Early Childhood Education [ECE] and college -only Running Start
students) The actual number of individual students per the October 2001, full
head count was 26,683 (All students at 10 including Kindergarten, ECE and college -only
Running Start students )
The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of
transitional facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. Our
plan is to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional
use of relocatables.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be
updated annually, with changes in the fee schedules adjusted accordingly
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2002 Page 3
I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection
For capital facilities planning, growth projections are based on cohort survival
and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the
next six years (see Table 2) The student generation factor, as defined on the next
page, is the basis for the growth projections from new developments.
King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were
used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system. (See Table 1)
8 32% of 21,646 King County live births in 1997 is forecast for 1,800 students
expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2002. Together with proportional growth
from new construction, 8 32% of live births is equivalent to the number of
students projected to enter kindergarten in the district for the next six-year
period. (See Table 2)
Early Childhood Education students (sometimes identified by others as
"Preschool Special Education [SE] or handicapped students") are calculated and
reported separately on a .5 FTE basis
The first grade population is traditionally 7 - 8% larger than the kindergarten
population due to growth and transfers to the District from private kindergartens.
Near term projections assume some growth from new developments to be offset
by current local economic conditions With a few notable exceptions, the
expectation is that enrollment increases will occur District -wide in the long term
District projections are based on historical growth patterns combined with
continuing development of projects in the pipeline dependent on market and
growth conditions.
The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact
to schools and monitor conditions to reflect adjustments in this assumption The
six-year enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new
development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district.
Information on new residential developments and the completion of these
proposed developments in all jurisdictions may be considered in the District's
future analysis of growth projections
Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments
The Kent School District serves six permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King
County, the cities of Kent, Covington, and Auburn The west Lake Sawyer area
has been annexed to the City of Black Diamond and Kent Learning Center is
located in the small portion of the City of SeaTac served by Kent School District.
(Continued)
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2002 Page 4
I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection (Continued)
STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR
"Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a
school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected
to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual
student generated rates for developments completed within the last five years.
Following these guidelines, the student generation factor for Kent School District
is as follows.
Single Family Elementary 504
Junior High .211
Senior High .183
Total 898
Multi -Family Elementary 273
Junior High 114
Senior High 076
Total 463
The student generation factor is based on a survey of 3,352 single family
dwelling units and 2,262 multi -family dwelling units with no adjustment for
occupancy. Please refer to Appendix E on Page 35 for details of the Student
Generation Factor survey.
The actual number of students in those residential developments was
determined using the District's Education Logistics (EDULOG) Transportation
System. In 3,352 single family dwelling units there were 1,691 elementary
students, 707 junior high students, and 612 senior high students for a total of
3,010 students. In 2,262 multi -family dwelling units, there were 617 elementary
students, 257 junior high students, and 173 senior high students, for a total of
1,047 students
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2002 Page 5
d
a
c
0
It o
Z y
h =
U z
Z
h "'
D J
J w
S W
U ui
Cl) F
Z LL.
lll
YN
N
a
ly
W
m
O
h
U
O
0
N CO
0
M 00
N
N W
IT
0
co
N 00
e
0
Lo
n
N 0
N O O O N N O w
O) � N N N N N N N N N --
O (00 O QOJi OW In N co (+M) co Cl) O
O O O O N O N O N I
N N N N N N N N N N
N W N M O) 0 N N n
N O) O N O O O O
I N N N N (V N N N N
V 10 N N 0 N M O N M m
10 c0 0 O 7 O V
N O O N O O O O) m lA o]
O N (V N N N N N
W 0 100 c00 N M m M M r
O) O O O O O O) rn fA
N N N N N (V
NMLOWWIT N 0 10 0
n rn O rn rn rn w M C m
(A N N 1- r r
� N
M N
N rn N
c , rn
N o
Nco
N
0 N 0
N
N m N
ED In m �
N n
N
Lq
N
N'D0
N
o
co
n
W
n
O)
N
N
O)
N
N
C
O)
0
N
O)
V
W
W
CO
(D
�
O
0
M
N
N
N
N
O
V
N
W
(0
N
N
Cl)
co
r
r
N
r
O
r
0
r
N
O
O
m
0
m
N
N
O'
O
N
T
LO
N
N
c
n
m
M
(0
O)
n
0
N
W
o
N
N
rn
r
M
rn
r
n
m
m
'-
O
m
r
M
P
r
0
r
r
0
m
n
Cl)N
IU)
O
M
oci
N
W
N
N
uCOi
N
N
E
C
v
O f
No
V•
N
N
O
N
0
O)
O
N
Om
N
N
M
O
10
m
O
O
O)
0)
to
f0
W
N
of
V
N
n
W
0
co
M
(O
(O
O)
O
v
O
0)
N
N
N
N
N
rn
O
rn
M
O
M
E
c
O
L
m
T I
N -
N
CD
o
LOV
0)
rn
N
V
O)
V
V
0
0
N
0
01
N
(O
lb
M
M
O
N
0
N
(D
N
c0
O
0
R
O
O
?
IO
N
N
N
M
W
nol
O
N
O
0
3
b
m
c
f
N
C ,
c
y
m
n
r
\
o
co
O
N
n
N
O
O
N
N
0
0
(O
O
N
M
O
N
N
rn
N
rn
N
Q
N
C
c I
t
N
O
>co
J
00
U
m
4
C
m
a
Y
N
G
co
Y
r
N
a
W
(7
N
N
a
W
M
N
a
W
7
W
a
W
N
fU
a
W
(0
N
a
W
n
fU
a
W
m
d
s
W
o)
W
'o
W
fU
a
W
r
N
s
W
r
N
a
W
C
N
E
c
W
5
o
d
m
Tw
O
c
m
E
c
O
F
o
O
C
-
c
c I
E
d
a
T
m
a
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
SIX • YEAR FTE ENROLLMENT PROJECTION
King County Live Births'
ACYUAi.
P R
0
J E
C T 1
D N
2001
2002
1 2003
1 2004
20051
2006
H 2007
-252
75
Kindergarten / Birth % 2
King County Live Births'
21,573
21,646
22,212
21,929
22,487
22,235
22,310 '
Increase / Decrease
-155
73
566
-283
558
-252
75
Kindergarten / Birth % 2
841%
832%
832%
832%
832%
832%
832%
2 Early Childhood Education @ 5
65
70
71
72
73
74
75
2'a Kindergarten FTE @ 5
907
900
942
929
951
940
942
Grade 1
1,935
1,953
1,896
1,983
1,955
1,999
1,975
Grade 2
2,067
1,923
1,984
1,926
2,012
1,983
2,026
Grade 3
2,040
2,069
1,967
2,028
1,968
2,054
2,024
Grade 4
2,166
2,121
2,177
2,070
2,132
2,069
2,157
Grade 5
2,110
2,168
2,180
2,236
2,126
2,188
2,123
Grade 6
2,251
2,135
2,221
2,232
2,288
2,176
2,247
Grade 7
2,123
2,326
2,227
2,315
2,326
2,383
2,266
Grade 8
2,152
2,082
2,308
2,209
2,295
2,305
2,360
Grade 9 5
2,244
2,377
2,322
1,212
1,511
1,712
1,913
Grade 95
2,572
2,461
2,555
2,566
Grade 10
2,064
2,119
2,251
2,198
2,432
2,327
2,414
Grade 11
1,835
1,815
1,910
2,027
1,979
2,188
2,092
Grade 12
1,439
1,485
1,537
1,616
1,714
1,672
1,847
Total FTE Enrollment 25,398 25,543 25,993 26,413 26,712 26,913 27,114
NWe 2/3
Yearly Increase
95
145
450
420
299
201
201
Yearly Increase %
039%
057%
176%
162%
1 13%
075%
075%
Cumulative Increase
197
342
792
1,212
1,511
1,712
1,913
Full Time Equivalent FTE 25,398 1 25,543 1 25,993 1 26,413 1 26,712 1 26,913 1 27,114
' Kindergarten protection based on King County actual live birth percentage and proportional growth from new construction
2 Kindergarten FTE enrollment protection at 5 is calculated by using the District's percentage of King County live births
5 years earlier compared to actual kindergarten enrollment in the previous year (Includes ECE @ 5 - Early Childhood Ed)
a Kindergarten projection is at 5 FTE although many schools have Full Day Kindergarten at 1 0 FTE with alternative funding
4 Oct 2001 P223 Headcount is 26,377 Full student headcount including 129 Preschool & 365 Running Start = 26,683
5 Grade level reconfiguration In 2004, 9th grade moves to the senior high schools
G R O W T H P R O J E C T I O N S - Adjustments for current economic factors
For facilities planning purposes, this six-year enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment
growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 April 2002 Page 7
III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service"
In order to determine the capacity of the District's facilities, the King County
Code refers to a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in
order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the
program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs
of special need, and other factors determined by the District which would, in the
District's judgment, best serve its student population.
This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District.
The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as
"impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower class size at those
facilities. Relocatables included in the capacity calculation use the same
standard of service as the permanent facilities (See Appendix A, e & C)
The standard of service defined herein may continue to change in the future
Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process
combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service
adjustments to meet the requirements of Student Achievement Initiative 728.
This process will affect various aspects of the District's "standard of service" and
future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans.
Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students
Class size for grades K - 3 should not exceed an average of 20 students.
Class size for grade 4 at impact schools should not exceed an average of 20
students.
Class size for grade 4 at non -impact schools should not exceed an average of 23
students.
Class size for grades 5 - 6 should not exceed an average of 29 students.
Program capacity for regular education classrooms is calculated at an average of
23 students per classroom because there are. five grade levels at K - 4 and
fluctuations between primary and intermediate grade levels (i e. third/fourth or
fourth/fifth grade split classes, etc.). Many elementary schools now provide full
day kindergarten programs with the second half of the day funded by grants or
tuition.
Students may have scheduled time in a special computer lab Students may also
be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or
facility.
Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self-
contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program
(continued)
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2002 Page 8
III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued)
Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in
classrooms for programs designated as follows:
English Language Learners (E L L)
Self-contained Special Education Programs
Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance)
Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I)
Gifted Education
Other Remediation Programs
Learning Assisted Program (LAP)
School Adjustment Programs for severely behavior -disordered students
Hearing Impaired
Mild, Moderate and Severe Developmental Disabilities
Developmental Kindergarten
Early Childhood Education (ECE) (3-4 yr. old students with disabilities)
Some of the above special programs require specialized classroom space, as
well as music and physical education classrooms, computer labs, etc; thus, the
permanent capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced
Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of
time to receive instruction in these special programs and space must be
allocated to serve these programs. Some newer buildings have been
constructed to accommodate most of these programs; some older buildings have
been modified, and in some circumstances, these modifications reduce the
classroom capacity of the buildings. When programs change, program capacity
fluctuates and is updated annually to reflect the change in program and capacity.
Current Standards of Service for Secondary Students
The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and
educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect
the capacity of the school buildings Reductions have been made in 7th and 10th
grade English classes for Initiative 728. These standards are subject to change
pending annual updates based on staff and public review for changes funded by
Student Achievement Initiative 728.
Class size for grades 7 - 9 should not exceed an average of 29 students.
Class size for 7th & 10'h grade English class should not exceed an average of 25
students.
Class size for grades 10 - 12 should not exceed an average of 31 students
Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self-
contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program.
(continued)
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2002 Page 9
I I I Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued)
Identified students will also be provided other education opportunities in
classrooms for programs designated as follows
Computer Labs
English Language Learners (E L L)
Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance)
Preschool and Daycare
Honors (Gifted) and Advanced Placement Programs
Basic Skills Programs
Traffic Safety Education
JROTC - Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps
Variety of Career and Technical Education Programs (Vocational Education)
i e Home & Family Life (Cooking, Sewing, Child Development, etc)
Business Education (Keyboarding, Accounting, Business Law,
Sales & Marketing, etc) Woods, Metals, Welding, Electronics,
Manufacturing Technology, Auto Shop, Commercial Foods,
Commercial Art, Drafting & Drawing, Electronics, Careers, etc
Many of these programs and others require specialized classroom space which
can reduce the permanent capacity of the school buildings In addition, an
alternative home school assistance, choice and transition program is provided for
students in grades K - 12 at Kent Learning Center
Space or Classroom Utilization
As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized
rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space
during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of
regular teaching stations Based on the analysis of actual utilization of
classrooms, the District has concluded that the standard utilization rate is 85%
for secondary schools Program capacity at elementary schools has been
adjusted from 95% utilization in the past to reflect 100% utilization at the
elementary level. In the future, the District will continue close analysis of actual
utilization.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilites Plan April 2002 Page 10
I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools
Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 24,559 students
based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section I I I Included in
this Plan is an Inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current
capacity. (See Table 3 on Page 12)
The program capacity Is periodically updated for changes in programs and the
addition of new schools. It also reflects the Student Achievement Initiative 728
reduction in class size from 22 1 to 20:1 in grades K - 3 and Grade 4 reductions
of 20 1 at Impact schools or 23 1 for non -Impact schools The class size
reduction received voter approval In the Educational Programs and Operations
Levy as well as through funding from 1-728. The District will conduct annual
public review and update class size recommendations in accordance with the
requirements of Student Achievement Initiative 728.
Kent Learning Center serves grades Kindergarten through 12 with transition,
choice and home school assistance programs It is located in the former
Grandview School in the western part of the District In the city of SeaTac. This
school was designed and is currently configured as an elementary school.
Calculation of Elementary, Junior High and Senior High School capacities are set
forth In Appendices A, B and C A map of existing schools is Included on Page
13.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2002 Page 11
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No 415
INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS
' Changes to capacity reflect program changes and continued reduction in K-3 class sae for 1-728
Y Kent Leaming Center serves grades K - 12 The building was formerly known as Grandview Elementary
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 April 2002 Page 12
2001-2002
Year
SCHOOL
opened
ABR
ADDRESS
Program
Capacity'
Carnage Crest Elementary
1990
CC
18235 -140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058
470
Cedar Valley Elementary
1971
CV
26500 Timbedane Way SE, Covington 98042
401
Covington Elementary
1961
CO
17070 SE Wax Road, Covington 98042
482
Crestwood Elementary--
1980
CW
25225 -180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042
437
__ _ __
Daniel Elementary
1992
DE
11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98031
426
East Hill Elementary
1953
EH
9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031
406
Emerald Park
1999
EP
11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031
460
Fainvood Elementary
1969
FW_16600-
148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058
431
Glenndge Elementary
1996
GR
19405 -120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058
_ _
450
Grass Lake Elementary
1971
GL
28700 -191st Place SE, Kent 98042
460
Horizon Elementary
1990
HE
27641 -144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042
444
Jenkins Creek Elementary
1987
JC
26915 -186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042
434
Kent Elementary
1999
KE
24700 - 64th Avenue South, Kent 98032
426
Lake Youngs Elementary
1965
LY
19660 -142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042
539
Martin Sortun Elementary
1987
MS
12711 SE 248th Street Kent 98031
440
M_ea_dow Rdg_e
1994
MR
27710 -108th Avenue SE, Kent 98031
418
_Elementary
Meridian Elementary
1939
ME
25621 -140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042
539
Millennium Elementary
2000
ML
11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98031
428
Neely -O'Brien Elementary
1990
NO
6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032
403
Lake Elementary
1938
PL
20831 -1008th Avenue SE, Kent 98031
374
_Panther _ _ _
Park Orchard Elementary
1963
PO
11010 SE 232nd Street, Kern 98031
460
Pine Tree Elementary
1967
PT
27825 -118th Avenue SE, Kent 98031
483
Ridgewood Elementary
1987
RW
18030 -162nd Place SE, Renton 98058
462
Sawyer Woods Elementary ----1994
SW
31135 -_2228th Avenue SE, Kent 98042
_ 483
Scenic Hill Elementary
1960
SH
26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98031
406
Soos Creek Elementary
1971
SC
12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031
444
Springbrook Elementary
1969
SB
20035- 100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031
416
Sunnse Elementary
1992
SR
22300 -132nd Avenue SE, Kern 98042
506
Elementary TOTAL
12,528
Cedar Heights Junior High
1993
CH
19640 SE 272 Street, Covington 98042
949
Kent Junior High
1952
KJ
620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032
816
Mattson Junior High
1981
MA
16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042
808
Meeker Junior High
1970
MK
1260_0 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058
Meridian Junior High
1958
MJ
23480 -120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031
747
Northwood Junior High
1996
NW
17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058
944
Sequoia Junior High
1966
SJ
11000 SE 264th Street, Kern 98031
830
Junior High TOTAL
5,984
Kent -Meridian Senior High
1951
KM
10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98031
1,417
Kentlake Senior High School
1997
KL 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042
1,622
Kentridge Senior High
1968
KR
12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031
1,301
Kentwood Senior High
1981
KW 25800 -164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042
1 291
Senior High TOTAL
5,631
Kent Learning Center (Grandview) 2
1965
LC 22420 Military Road, Des Moines 98198
416
DISTRICT TOTAL
24,559
' Changes to capacity reflect program changes and continued reduction in K-3 class sae for 1-728
Y Kent Leaming Center serves grades K - 12 The building was formerly known as Grandview Elementary
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 April 2002 Page 12
MIC
�
z�
Kent School District Six -Year Capital _Plan
O
\
�
0 U
§ §
Z7iiR��
c
U
f
D
K2o�/J�
z
\]
O
kCLUU'0
E
u
V
) §
coo
c
U
�
k
�
z�
Kent School District Six -Year Capital _Plan
April 2002 We!
k }
f
_
z
\]
E
`.
)
_
,!
00,
do
\
US
Ji_/
\�
®�
|r
e
a
\
`
E
\
do
>
\
/:
\\0
.%
\2\
OE
,
\k2
7±£a
s _
:°
)
|%b1
\
\\j}
April 2002 We!
V Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan
At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring of 2002, the following projects are
completed or in the planning phase in the District
• Junior High #8 was previously planned to fill future needs for grades 7 through 9 The
plan did not receive voter approval and was changed to add new capacity at the senior
high schools and move 9th grade students to the high schools The Board authorized
purchase of a site for Junior High #8 east of 120' Avenue SE at SE 286`" Street That site
was determined not to be feasible and the property is for sale
• Construction funding for additions to three high schools received voter approval These
additions will add capacity for 1,923 students Construction is expected to be complete by
Fall of 2004
• The Board authorized grade level reconfiguration to move 9'h grade students to the high
schools and serve 7th and 8th grade students at the junior highs Reconfiguration will
provide additional capacity at junior high schools Implementation is expected for 2004
• A site was purchased at 15435 SE 256th Street in Covington, and remains a part of the
site bank for future schools Other potential future sites and facilities are listed in Table 4
and shown on the site map on page 17
• Some funding is secured for purchase of additional portables and some funding may be
provided by impact fees as needed The sites have not been determined
Elementary schools have a capacity planned for approximately 540 students, depending
on placement of special programs Junior highs are planned for a program capacity of
approximately 1,065 students and Kentlake High School (#4) has a current program
capacity of 1,622 Additions at high schools will provide capacity for 1,923 students
County and city planners, decision -makers and school districts are encouraged to
consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design
plans for new roads and developments This should include sidewalks for pedestrian
safety, pull-outs and turn-arounds for school buses
Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the
District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future (See Table 4)
The voter approved bond issue for $105 4 million in 1990 and $130 million in 1994
included funding for the purchase of eleven sites for some of these and future schools,
and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is secured for
purchase of additional sites but some may be funded with impact fees as needed Not
all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements and some
property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs
2002 voter approval of $69 5 million bond issue for capital improvement included
construction funding for additions to three high schools which are scheduled to be
completed in 2004 Student Achievement Initiative 728 funds are being utilized to reduce
class size and provide extended learning opportunities. Based on community input, the
Board will continue annual review of standard of service and those decisions will be
reflected in the each update of the Capital Facilities Plan
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2002 Page 14
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity
SCHOOL I FACILITY 1 SITE I LOCATION I Type I Status
Protected
Protected
% for
Completion
Program
new
Date I
Capacity
Growth
12 Former Jr Hi #8 site (Plemmons-Yeh-Wr SE 286th Street & 124th Ave SE, Kent
Site was determined to be "unbwldable" for a junior high and property is now for sale
Notes
' Unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future
2 TBD - To be determined - Some sites are acquired but placement, timing and/or configuration have not been determined
3 Numbers correspond to sites on Map on Page 16 Other site locations are parcels identified in Table 7 on Page 26
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 April 2002 Page 15
ELEMENTARY
(Numbers assigned to future schools may not correlate with number of existing schools )
Elementary # 31 (Unfunded)
To be determined 2 New
Planning
TBD'
540 75%
JUNIOR HIGH
Grade Level Reconfiguration will
Move 9th grade to High School Program
Planning
2004
provide additional rapacity at Junior High schools
SENIOR HIGH
Classroom additions at
Kent -Meridian Additions
Planning
2004
26 100%
3 high schools and move
Kentridge Additions
Planning
2004
1,001 100%
9th Grade to high school
Kentwood Additions
Planning
2004
896 100%
Additional
TEMPORARY FACILITIES
Capacity
Relocatables
For placement as needed New
Planning
2002+
23-31 each 100%
SUPPORT FAC1LfTIES
Bus Facility (Unfunded)'
To be determined 2 New
Planning
TBD 2
N / A
# on
Land Use
Map
' OTHER SITES ACQUIRED
Type
Jurisdiction
4
Covington area (Near Mattson JH)
SE 251 & 164 SE, Covington 98042
Elementary
City of Covington
7
Covington area (Scarsella)
SE 290 & 156 SE, Kent 98042
Elementary
King County
5
Covington area West (Halleson)
15435 SE 256 Street, Covington 98042
TBD 2
City of Covington
3
Ham Lake area (Pollard)
16820 SE 240, Kent 98042
Elementary
King County
8
SE of Lake Morton area (West)
SE 332 & 204 SE, Kent 98042
Junior High
King County
2
Shady Lake area (Sowers, etc)
17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98058
Elementary
King County
1
So King Co Activity Center (Nike site)
SE 167 & 170 SE, Renton 98058
TBD'
King County
12 Former Jr Hi #8 site (Plemmons-Yeh-Wr SE 286th Street & 124th Ave SE, Kent
Site was determined to be "unbwldable" for a junior high and property is now for sale
Notes
' Unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future
2 TBD - To be determined - Some sites are acquired but placement, timing and/or configuration have not been determined
3 Numbers correspond to sites on Map on Page 16 Other site locations are parcels identified in Table 7 on Page 26
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 April 2002 Page 15
LO
r.�
O C.4
Z �
C*q
V �
p .
�
O c
O 0
0 2
�
�
E
00
E
MA:
\®
»
(
/
/
�
fC
/
/
�
/
}
®
//
\!%
Kent School _aSix-Year Capital Facilities Plan
!
�
\
/
}
`
9
:
_
\
Ck
�. /
�!
\
\
/ °
§
_
y»
ƒ
�
�)
°
j
E
«
CM
%
00
2
\
E ` ^
7
18
E \CT
�
k
\ 'i 22
4 %
}
,\
\
wm
{
'
:
0
LE
2
§
)
7
(L
April 2002 Page 16
V I Relocatable Classrooms
For the purpose of clarification, the term "portables" and the more descriptively
accurate term, "relocatables" are used interchangeably in this Plan. The Plan
also references use of portables or relocatables as interim or transitional
capacity/facilities
Currently, the District utilizes 158 total relocatables Of this total, 74 are utilized
to house students in excess of permanent capacity, 78 are used for program
purposes at school locations, and six for other purposes (See Appendices A S C D)
Based on enrollment projections, program capacity and funded permanent
facilities, the District anticipates the need to purchase some additional
relocatables during the next six-year period
During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that
all of the District's relocatables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During
the useful life of some of the relocatables, the school-age population may decline
in some communities and increase in others, and these relocatables provide the
flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community
Portables, or relocatables, may be used as interim or transitional facilities.
1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school
facilities.
2. To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased
capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet
that demand.
3 To meet unique program requirements
Portables, or relocatables, currently in use will be evaluated resulting in some
being improved and some replaced Quality concerns will be among those
addressed by the next Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee in review of capital
facilities needs for the next bond issue.
The Plan projects that the District will use relocatables to accommodate interim
housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of relocatables, their
impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the
Interrelationship between relocatables, emerging technologies and educational
restructuring will continue to be be examined.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2002 Page 17
VII Projected Six -Year Classroom Capacity
As stated in Section I V, the program capacity study is periodically updated for
changes in special programs and reflects class size reduction in Grades K - 4.
As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3 on Page 12, the
program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison
charts. (See Tables 5& SA -B -Con pages 19- 22)
Enrollment is reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding
apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE) The first school day
of October is set by OSPI as the enrollment count date for the year.
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) student enrollment for October 1, 2001 was
25,332 98 with kindergarten students counted at .5 and excluding Early
Childhood Education students (ECE - preschool special education) and College -
only Running Start students. (see Tables 5&SA-B-Conpages 19-22)
Kent School District continues to be the fourth largest district in the state of
Washington. P223 Headcount for October 1, 2001 was 26,377 with kindergarten
students counted at 1 0 and excluding ECE and college -only Running Start
students. A headcount of all students enrolled on October 1, 2001 totals 26,683
which includes ECE and college -only Running Start students
Based on the enrollment forecasts, current inventory and capacity, current
standard of service, relocatable capacity, and future planned classroom space,
the District anticipates having sufficient capacity to house students over the next
six years. (See Table 5 and Tables 5 A -B -C on Pages 19 - 22)
This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There
may be significant need for additional portables and/or new schools to
accommodate growth within the District and class size reduction mandated
under Student Achievement Initiative 728. Some schools, by design, may be
opened with relocatables on site. Boundary changes, limited movement of
relocatables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring
will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and underutilization of
facilities in different parts of the District.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2002 Page 18
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 410
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
SENIOR HIGH
Senior High Permanent Program Capacty 5,631 5,631 5,631 5,631 7,554 7,554 7,554
New Permanent Senior High Construction
Additions at three high schools 1,923
Grade level reconfiguration - 9th grade to move to high schools in 2004
Subtotal b'b31 b,b31 b,b6l /,554 /,554 /,554 /,554
Relocatable Capacity Required t 0 0 93 868 1,054 1,209 1,395
TOTAL CAPACITY t 1 5,631 5,631 5,724 8,422 8,608 8,763 8,949
FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 283 5,338 5,419 5,698 8,413 8,586 8,742 8,919
SURPLUS DEFICIT CAPACITY 1 293 212 26 9 22 21 30
Number of Relocatables Required 0 0 3 28 34 39 45
Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes
2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment, excluding full time Running Start students
Approximately 150 Junior High students are served all or part of the day at high schools
3 Grade level reconfiguration - 9th grade will move to the high schools in 2004
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C April 2002 Page 19
SCHOOL
YEAR
2001-2002
2002-2003
1 2003-2004
2004-2005
1 2005-2006
1 2006-2007
1 2007-2008
Actual
P R O J E C T E
D
Senior High Permanent Program Capacty 5,631 5,631 5,631 5,631 7,554 7,554 7,554
New Permanent Senior High Construction
Additions at three high schools 1,923
Grade level reconfiguration - 9th grade to move to high schools in 2004
Subtotal b'b31 b,b31 b,b6l /,554 /,554 /,554 /,554
Relocatable Capacity Required t 0 0 93 868 1,054 1,209 1,395
TOTAL CAPACITY t 1 5,631 5,631 5,724 8,422 8,608 8,763 8,949
FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 283 5,338 5,419 5,698 8,413 8,586 8,742 8,919
SURPLUS DEFICIT CAPACITY 1 293 212 26 9 22 21 30
Number of Relocatables Required 0 0 3 28 34 39 45
Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes
2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment, excluding full time Running Start students
Approximately 150 Junior High students are served all or part of the day at high schools
3 Grade level reconfiguration - 9th grade will move to the high schools in 2004
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C April 2002 Page 19
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 410
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
JUNIOR HIGH
Junior High Permanent Program Capacaty 5,984 5,984 5,984 5,984 5,984 5,984 5,984
New Capacity, from Grade Reconfigurahon
Grade level reconfiguration - 9th grade to move to high schools in 2004
Subtotal 5,984 5,984 5,984 5,984 5,984 5,984 5,984
Relocatable Capacity Required' 551 812 899 0 0 0 0
TOTAL CAPACITY 18,3 6,535 6,796 6,883 5,984 5,984 5,984 5,984
FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 2 6,519 6,785 6,857 4,524 4,621 4,688 4,626
SURPLUS DEFICIT CAPACITY 1 16 11 26 1,460 1,363 1,296 1,358
Number of Relocatables Required 19 28 31 0 0 0 0
' Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes
2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment / Projection
Approximately 150+ 9th grade students are served at high schools
3 Grade level reconfiguration - 9th grade will move to the high schools in 2004
April 2002 Page 20
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B
SCHOOL YEAR
2001-2002
2002-2003
2003-2004
3
2004-2005
2005-2006
2006-2007
1 2007-2008
Actual
P R O J E C T E
D
Junior High Permanent Program Capacaty 5,984 5,984 5,984 5,984 5,984 5,984 5,984
New Capacity, from Grade Reconfigurahon
Grade level reconfiguration - 9th grade to move to high schools in 2004
Subtotal 5,984 5,984 5,984 5,984 5,984 5,984 5,984
Relocatable Capacity Required' 551 812 899 0 0 0 0
TOTAL CAPACITY 18,3 6,535 6,796 6,883 5,984 5,984 5,984 5,984
FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 2 6,519 6,785 6,857 4,524 4,621 4,688 4,626
SURPLUS DEFICIT CAPACITY 1 16 11 26 1,460 1,363 1,296 1,358
Number of Relocatables Required 19 28 31 0 0 0 0
' Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes
2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment / Projection
Approximately 150+ 9th grade students are served at high schools
3 Grade level reconfiguration - 9th grade will move to the high schools in 2004
April 2002 Page 20
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
ELEMENTARY
Elementary Permanent Program Capacity 12,528 12,944 12,944 12,944 12,944 12,944 12,944
Kent Learning Center- Special Program' 416
New Permanent Elementary Construction
Elementary # 31 (Unfunded)4
540
Subtotal 12,944 12,944 12,944 12,944 12,944 12,944 13,484
Relocatable Capacity Required 2 1 598 414 506 552 575 552 92
TOTAL CAPACITY z 13,542 13,358 13,450 13,496 13,519 13,496 13,576
FTE ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 3 1 13,541 13,339 13,438 13,476 13,505 1
SURPLUS DEFICIT CAPACITY 1 1 19 12 20 14 13 7
Number of Relocatables Required 26 18 22 24 25 24 4
' Kent Learning Center is a special program at Grandview School serving students In Grades K - 12
The school was designed and is currently configured as an elementary school
2 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and is updated periodically to reflect program changes
3 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or Projection (ECE & Kindergarten @ 5)
4 Unfunded facility needs are pending review
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A April 2002 Page 21
SCHOOL
YEAR
2001-2002
2002-2003
2003-2008 1
2004-2005 1
2005-2006 1
2006-2007 1
2007-2008
Actual
P
R O
J E
C
T E
D
Elementary Permanent Program Capacity 12,528 12,944 12,944 12,944 12,944 12,944 12,944
Kent Learning Center- Special Program' 416
New Permanent Elementary Construction
Elementary # 31 (Unfunded)4
540
Subtotal 12,944 12,944 12,944 12,944 12,944 12,944 13,484
Relocatable Capacity Required 2 1 598 414 506 552 575 552 92
TOTAL CAPACITY z 13,542 13,358 13,450 13,496 13,519 13,496 13,576
FTE ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 3 1 13,541 13,339 13,438 13,476 13,505 1
SURPLUS DEFICIT CAPACITY 1 1 19 12 20 14 13 7
Number of Relocatables Required 26 18 22 24 25 24 4
' Kent Learning Center is a special program at Grandview School serving students In Grades K - 12
The school was designed and is currently configured as an elementary school
2 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and is updated periodically to reflect program changes
3 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or Projection (ECE & Kindergarten @ 5)
4 Unfunded facility needs are pending review
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A April 2002 Page 21
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 410
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
TOTAL DISTRICT
Permanent Program Ca acct ' 24,559 24,559 24,559 24,559 26,482 26,482 26,482
New Permanent Construction
Grade level reconfiguration - 9th grade to move to high schools In 2004
Additions to Senior High schools
Elementary # 31 (Unfunded) 5
1,923
6MI
Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 24,559 24,559 24,559 26,482 26,482 26,482 27,022
Interim Relocatable Capacity
Elementary Relocatable Capacity Required
598
414
506
552
575
552
92
Junior High Relocatable Capacity Required
SCHOOL
YEAR
2001-2002
1 2002-2003
1 2003-2004
1 2004-2005
i 2005-2006
Senior High Relocatable Capacity Required
1 2006-2007
1 2007-2008
Actual
I P R O 1 E C T E
D
1,209
1,395
Total Relocatable Capacity Required `
1,149
1,226
1,498
1,420
1,629
1,761
1,487
Permanent Program Ca acct ' 24,559 24,559 24,559 24,559 26,482 26,482 26,482
New Permanent Construction
Grade level reconfiguration - 9th grade to move to high schools In 2004
Additions to Senior High schools
Elementary # 31 (Unfunded) 5
1,923
6MI
Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 24,559 24,559 24,559 26,482 26,482 26,482 27,022
Interim Relocatable Capacity
Elementary Relocatable Capacity Required
598
414
506
552
575
552
92
Junior High Relocatable Capacity Required
551
812
899
0
0
0
0
Senior High Relocatable Capacity Required
0
0
93
868
1,054
1,209
1,395
Total Relocatable Capacity Required `
1,149
1,226
1,498
1,420
1,629
1,761
1,487
TOTAL CAPACITY '
25,708
1 25,785
1 26,057
1 27,902
1 28,111
1 28,243
28,509
283
rOTAL FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTIO 25,398 25,543 25,993 26,413 26,712 26,913 27,114
DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 1 310 242 64 1,489 1,399 1,330 1,395
' Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes
2 FTE = Full Time Equivalent Enrollment (ie ECE Preschool Handicapped 8 1/2 day Kindergarten student = 5).
' In 2004, 9th grade will move to the high schools and result in increased capacity at Junior High level
2001-2002 total classroom relocatable capacity is 2,051
5 Unfunded facility needs are pending review
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Faalities Pian Table 5 April 2002 Page 22
VIII Finance Plan
The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District
plans to finance improvements for the years 2002 - 2003 through 2007 - 2008
The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact
fees The plan is based on voter approval of future bond issues, collection of
impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation
fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act.
Kent Elementary #27a, which opened in January 1999 as a replacement for the
original Kent Elementary School, was the last school for which the District
received state matching funds under the current state funding formula The
District anticipates receiving state matching funds for the senior high school
additions.
Millennium Elementary #30 which opened in the fall of 2000 was the last
elementary school that has received funding approval from voters. Voters
approved a $69.5 million bond Issue for Capital Construction and Improvements
In February 2002 This will fund budding additions at three high schools which will
coincide with moving 9th grade to the senior high in 2004 Some funding is
secured for additional portables and some will be funded from impact fees.
Unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future
For the Six -Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates
from Kent School District Facilities Department. Please see page 25 for a
summary of the cost basis.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facahttes Plan April 2002 Page 23
/
L)
LO
0
0
S
�
§
/
k
Ct
Ci
]`
#}
}
)
\
Oct
!),
(
))
}
§
®
7
k
@
(/
Cli
i
`
e
&
&
3
N
{
\
\
\
fn
LO
C
®
\
(
k
�
fL 0co
}
)
/
§
)
04
^CD
cli
}
C)
_
}
)
§
$
)
ƒ
k
2
_
—
k
)
)
§
\
—
—
LL
cn
w`
}
,
E
}
!
)
\
«
)co
\
/
G
�
/
/
§
/
k
VIII Finance Plan - Cost Basis Summary
For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last
elementary school, with 5% inflation factor, and the projected construction cost
of the additions to three high schools.
Elementary School
Cost
Projected Cost
Millennium Elementary (#30 -open 2000
$12,182,768
Current cost of Elementary #31
with 5% Inflation
$13,431,501
Projected cost of Elementary #31 in 2007
with 5% Inflation
$9,600,000
$17,142,378
Senior High Schools
Projected Cost
Total
Addition to Kent -Meridian
$260,000
Addition to Kentrid a
$10,400,000
Addition to Kentwood
$9,600,000
Projected construction cost of
additions to 3 High Schools
$20,260,000
The site acquisition cost Is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built
on within the last ten years Please see Table 7 on page 26 for a list of site
acquisition costs and averages
The impact fee calculations on pages 28 and 29 Include a "District Adjustment"
which is equal to the amount of Increase that the impact fee formulas drive out
for this year and adjusted for increase In the Consumer Price Index. The reasons
for this adjustment include, 1) the district's long-term commitment to keep Impact
fee Increases as minimal as possible, and 2) our community's overwhelming
support of Initiative 695
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2002 Page 25
L
R
R
R
^ R
O
(V
Q
d
Q
>
r
m
>
R
«
«
Q
c
M
t9
�
R
�
r
O
t`
N
CO
O
N
N
N
O
M
W
C
N
It
r
M
f0
r
O
f0
O
O
N
O
W
O
V'
co
M
N
W
vt0
a
tc
N
m
N
cr
O
N
V
0/
N
t0
r
M
t0
r
-�T
c0
M
n
O
7
a
(O
N
W
N
M
V
O
O
M
M
M
N
to
N
N
M
O
N
ca
O
(O
N
O
N
cl
to
N
t
M
0
r
O
69
f9
fA
b9
N
V3
fH
f9
fA
fA
fA
fA
fA
di
fA
(O
fA
V3
E9
Vi
Vi
�
4
G
N
M
tD
yy
N
O
M
O
O
O
O
N
n
h
N
M
t0
M
V
O
N
W
M
M
R
N
N
O
O
N
O
O
M
ch
V
Cl)
M
*'
M
t0
O
c0
O
Cl)
n
t0
c0
la
a
N
M
N
W
m
N
O
O
O
M
M
O
N
M
w
t0
M
O
O
tG
O
m
O
r
T
cD
r
O
0
0
M
N
N
O
t(9
N
M
r
Cl)
N
O
m
M
M
7
to
r
y
t0
O
r
'C
M
V1
N
N
M
M
n
M
O
FA
t0
Vi
1n
(/f
M�
V!
d
to
CO
M
N
Vi
0
O
0
O
0
O
O
tD
V!
O
tO
f9
M
N
I
to
O
(D
fA
V
tfi
Og
I�
(O
I�
O
V
vi
O
M
�
0
O
N
O
O
to
O
EA
O
M
M
M
�
M
pt
tv
t"SW
r
r
M
r
M
m
N
N
O
M
M
a
OD
M
V
O
M
Q
ry
R
�O
O
p
m
O
p
C
N
O
C
d
C
S
=
V
Y
OOf
a
N
m
o
a
N
2C
Obi
C
W
ppb
0
m
m
OW
O
cA
C
„cQ)
N
C
N
y
Y
I
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
K
W
N
y
N
4Wl
ry
N
r
a
a
Q
N
N
c0
N
W
W
W
O
m
N
N
y
N
W
N
W
W
W
iy
W
N
W
M
N
to
O
fn
O
O
N
0
N
(O
O
(A
O
(n
O
ip
f/1
O
l7
t0
O
O)
f/1
�O
t7
O
l7
N
N
'
f7
N
O
'
O
O
_)
W
W
O
V
N
0
W
N
• O
N
rn
N
rn
V
t0
0
m
0
m
o
£
>
>
rn
c
Q
pRi
a�'i
12rn
rn
rn
R
p
n
o
m
R
a
{5
I
0
p
8
C6
O
N
0
cp_
p
R
R
a
g
6
C
odr
9'
O
m
'O
a
E
N
N
p
q
U
N
N
M
>
?�
N
p
v
C
R
Y
N
R
Y
2
O
Y
M
m
E
R
v
$
m
?
m
c
°o
Z`
o
c
_�
2
L
o'
M,
W
0-
c
0
E
E
C
to
#
d
y
m'
d
N
in
N
O
y
c=
U
caci
d
N
-
awi
Y
w
O
W
E
W
d
E
CE
W
p
O
O
=O
GO'32�
ncan
U=
UoU
C
m
o
0
(D�
N
=
v
a
❑
to
0)
C7
Y
W
U
to
to
to
to
U
Z
Y
(n
to
Y
Y
R
o
O
9¢
o
ia
m
m
w
2
y
c
E
V
M
N
n
M
`o
W
.N-
`o
O
#
W
y
Z
Z
I
N
d
A
H
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
Student Generation Factors - Single Family
Elementary
0 504
Junior High
0 211
Senior High
0 183
Total
0 898
Projected Student Capacity
Elementary
540
Junior High
1,065
Senior High
1,923
Required Site Acreage per Facility
Elementary (required) 11
Junior High (required) 21
Senior High (required) 27
New Facility Construction Cost
Elementary $13,431,501
Junior High $0
Senior High $20,260,000
See calculations on Pg 25
Temporary Facility Square Footage
Elementary
86,956
Junior High
26,280
Senior High
21,736
Total 4%
134,972
Permanent Facility Square Footage
Elementary
1,455,606
Junior High
753,079
Senior High
800,882
Total 96%
3,009,567
Total Facilities Square Footage
Elementary
1,542, 562
Junior High
779,359
Senior High
822,618
Total
3,144,539
Developer Provided Sites / Facilities
Value 0
Dwelling Units 0
Student Generation Factors - Multi -Family
Elementary
0 273
Junior High
0 114
Senior High
0 076
Total
0 463
SPI Square Footage per Student
Elementary 80
Junior High 11333
Senior High 120
Average Site Cost / Acre
Elementary $72,017
Junior High $0
Senior High $0
Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost
Elementary @ 23 $88,525
Junior High @ 29 $88,525
Senior High @ 31 $88,525
State Match Credit
Current State Match Percentage 5419%
for Senior High Additions
Boeckh Index - Cost / Sq. Ft.
Current Boeckh Index $110 32
District Average Assessed Value
Single Family Residence $205,665
District Average Assessed Value
Multi -Family Residence $61,255
Capital Levy Tax Rate/$1,000
Current / $1,000 Tax Rate $2 10
General Obligation Bond Interest Rate
Current Bond Interest Rate 519%
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2002 Page 27
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence
Formula ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor
Required Site Acreage I Average Site Cost/Acre I
Facility Capacity I
Student Factor
$13,88552
A 1 (Elementary) 11 $72,017
540
0 504
$73937
A2 (Junior High) 21 $0
1,065
0211
$0
A 3 (Senior High) 27 $0
1,923
0 183
$0
0 898
A ---->
$73937
Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence
Formula ((Facility Cost /Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio)
Construction Cost Factor)
Student Factor
Footage Ratio
B1 (Elementary) $13,431,501 540
0504
096
$12,03462
B 2 (Junior High) $0 1,065
0 211
096
$0
B 3 (Senior High) $20,260,000 1,923
0 183
096
$1,85090
0 898
B -->
$13,88552
Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence
Formula ((Facility Cost/ Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary/ Total Square Footage Ratio)
Facility Cost Facility Capacity
Student Factor
Footage Ratio
C 1 (Elementary) $88,525 23
0 504
0,04
$7759
C2 (Junior High) $88,525 29
0 211
004
$2576
C 3 (Senior High) $88,525 31
0 183
004
$2090
0 898
C --->
$12426
State Match Credit per Single Family Residence
Formula Boeckh Index x SPI Square Ft / student x District Match %
x Student Factor
Boeckh CosttSq Ft SPI Sq Ft /Student I
Distnct Match %
Student Factor
D 1 (Elementary) $11032 80
0
0 504
$0
D2 (Junior High) $11032 11333
0
0 211
$0
D 3 (Senior High) $11032 120
05419
0 183
$1,31282
D---->
$1,31282
Tax Credit per Single Family Residence
Average SF Residential Assessed Value
$205,665
Current Capital Levy Rate / $1,000
$210
Current Bond Interest Rate
519%
Years Amortized (10 Years)
10
TC --->
$3,30268
Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value
Dwelling Units
0
0
FC ---->
0
Fee Recap
A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence
$73937
B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence
$13,88552
C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence
$12426
Subtotal
$14,74916
D = State Match Credit per Residence
$1,31282
TC = Tax Credit per Residence
$3.30268
Subtotal
- $4,61551
Total Unfunded Need $10,13365
Developer Fee Obligation $5,06683
FC = Facility Credit (if applicable) 0
District Adjustment (See Page 25 for explanation) ($91983)
Net Fee Obligation per Single Family Residence $4,14700
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2002 Page 28
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENCE
Site Acquisition Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit
Formula ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor
Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit
Formula ((Facility Cost/ Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent/ Total Square Footage Ratio)
Constn Ghon Cost I Facility Capacity
Required Site Acreage
I Average Site CostlACre I
Facility Capacity I
Student Factor
0 273
A 1 (Elementary)
11
$72,017
540
0 273
$40049
A2 (Junior High)
21
$0
1,065
0 114
$0
A 3 (Senior High)
27
$0
1,923
0 076
$0
Formula ((Facility Cost/ Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary/
Total Square Footage Ratio)
$54522
0 463
A --->
$400 49
Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit
Formula ((Facility Cost/ Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent/ Total Square Footage Ratio)
Constn Ghon Cost I Facility Capacity
I Student Factor I
Footage Ratio
004 $4203
B 1 (Elementary) $13,431,501 540
0 273
096
$6,518 76
B 2 (Junior High) $0 1,065
0 114
096
$0
B 3 (Senior High) $20,260,000 1,923
0 076
096
$76868
0
0 463
B —>
$7,287 43
Temporary Facility Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit
0 076
$54522
Formula ((Facility Cost/ Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary/
Total Square Footage Ratio)
$54522
C 1 (Elementary)
$88,525
23 0 273
004 $4203
C 2 (Junior High)
$88,525
29 0 114
004 $1392
C 3 (Senior High)
$88,525
31 0 076
004 $868
0
0 273
0 463
C ---> $6463
State Match Credit per Multi -Family Residence Unit
Formula Boeckh Index x SPI Square Ft /student x District Match % x Student Factor
Boeckh CDst/Sq Ft SPI Sq Ft /Student I
District Match % I
Student Factor
D 1 (Elementary) $11032 80
0
0 273
$0
D 2 (Junior High) $11032 11333
0
0 114
$0
D 3 (Senior High) $11032 120
05419
0 076
$54522
D -->
$54522
Tax Credit per Multi -Family Residence Unit
Average MF Residential Assessed Value $66,868
Current Capital Levy Rate / $1,000 $210
Current Bond Interest Rate 519%
Years Amortized (10 Years) 10 TC ----> $1,07380
Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value I Dwelling Units
0 0 FC --> 0
Fee Recap
A = Site Acquisition per Multi -Family Unit
B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit
C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit
Subtotal
D = State Match Credit per MF Unit
TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit
$40049
$7,28743
$6463
$54522
$1,07380
$7,75256
Subtotal - $1,61902
Total Unfunded Need $6,13354
Developer Fee Obligation $3,06677
FC = Facility Credit (if applicable) 0
District Adjustment (See Page 25 for explanation) ($51277)
Net Fee Obligation per Multi -Family Residence Unit 1 $2,55400
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2002 Page 29
IX Summary of Changes to April 2001 Capital Facilities Plan
The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") Is updated annually based on previous Plans in
effect since 1993 The primary changes from the April 2001 Plan are summarized here
Millennium Elementary #30 opened In August, 2000 Property for Junior High #8 was
determined not feasible and Is still for sale An additional site (Halleson) was purchased
in the city of Covington and Is included In this Plan. Voters approved funding for
additions at three high schools to accommodate new growth, moving 9th grade to senior
highs, which will provide additional capacity for grade 7-8 at junior high schools In 2004
Changes to capacity continue to reflect reduction in class size for grades K - 4 as well
as program changes. Further reduction In class size for Student Achievement Initiative
728 Is reflected in this update Changes In portables or transitional capacity reflect
purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement of portables between facilities
Student enrollment forecast Is updated annually
Permanent facility costs are based on schools built most recently with adjustment for 5%
Inflation rate The district expects to receive state matching funds for projects In this
Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually Unfunded facility needs will be
reviewed In the future Impact fee calculations Include a 'District Adjustment" which is
equal to the amount of Increase from Impact fee formulas and adjusted for Increase In
the Consumer Price Index See page 25 for further explanation.
The biennial student generation factor survey was updated last year to reflect changes
Changes reflected no adjustment for occupancy Survey data Is included as Appendix E
Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors Include
ITEM
Student Generation Factor
Elem
0504
0 504
No change
Single Family (SF)
Jr
0 211
0 211
Updated in 2001 Plan
Sr
0 183
0 183
Total
0 898
0 898
Student Generation Factor
Elem
0273
0273
No change
Multi -Family (MF)
Jr
0114
0114
Updated in 2001 Plan
Sr
0 076
0 076
Total
0 463
0 463
State Match Credit
0%
5419%
1" change since 1999 Plan
Boeckh Index (Cost per square foot)
$10334
$11032
Per SPI
Average Assessed Valuation (AV)
SF
$192,198
$205,665
Per Puget Sound ESD
AV - Average of Condominiums & Apts
MF
$61,255
$66,868
Per Puget Sound ESD
Debt Service Capital Levy Rate / $1000
$232
$210
Per King County Assessor
General Obligation Bond Interest Rate
507%
519%
Market Rate
Impact Fee - Single Family
SF
$3,782
$4,147
Change to fee
Impact Fee - Multi -Family
MF
$2,329
$2,554
Change to fee
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2002 Page 30
X
Appendixes
Appendix A: Calculations of Capacities for Elementary Schools
Appendix B: Calculations of Capacities for Junior High Schools
Appendix C: Calculations of Capacities for Senior High Schools
Appendix D: Use of Relocatables
Appendix E: Student Generation Factor Survey
Kent School Distract Six -Year Capita! FaDiftfes Pfan
Apnt2002 Page 31
U)
W
-j
LOLO Q
� Q
U
0 O
Z J
�- W
U OC
H O
N
DK
J
2 W
U Z
vi -
z
2
Y
^QJ
V
U
U
w
K
CL
W
U
K
W
V)
O
Z�
F
h
O P Y1 N V O mt h h O
V (h a s C] C N C Y) V C C< 1m V O t0 V 1m O N S C V Q O Q
O O O N O O M O N O O N N O O O N - - N- N O O- O" - O
- I •- N M -- O N- M N N N N N - - 1 N N- N O V N N N O
M V h N M N N N N N M O Q M N M M M d N Q C- N N M N - M
u v oU 3:0 1 w w um�_� x �� z a a a rc ti� y y y
`m
c
m
E w U
Y E m c m2
rn mm 0c 9y0 m =dm e qy`c w s �cc wjm
m ? mQ m
mU U L j E > m 3UW> 0 W
m c m c c c
U U U U O W W a C7 2 Y L 2 Z 0.
zo
�1
9
'`1
H
Z
W
KI
N
ry
.2
=
W
B
W
O^
w
I --
m
p^
W
mym
O
m
N
m
o
O
M
r
m
ONi
�
O
N�
0
LL
O
M
W
Iw
N
tl
T
w
W
N
N
O
N
O
m
w
O
V
m
O
g
ELU
a"
C
m
U
m
w
U.
m
o
�
U
�
m
m
A
�
v
LU
E
y
a
U
�
a
W
ip
O
O
r
N
N
O
N
g
A
L¢
o
w
y
w
v Q
a
A
p U
a
fi
z
m
{� W
o
m
v
m
m
o
m
Si
m
v
A
a
rn
n
m
m
m
L'
a
y
H O
x
J
U
p
W
0
Q Z
m
a
U
d
_>
N
a
W
H
IL
w
W
Y
J
w
o
umi
a
oA
in
M
"
E
m
chi
Q
n
x
v
w
w
x
o
Q
E
U
ik
a
M
12
W
N
N
W
�
y
g
u
E
O)
y
E
C
O
Lj
w
K
IL
m
U
2
�
N
y
W
m
M
T
C
w
Of
N
n
^
O
N
a
m
U
�
U
Y
m
E
m
2
41
U
N
m
W
to
¢
M
N
J
n
v
O
0
x
w
x
m
U
O
w
v
'
W
C
L
y
ry
N
N
d
O
N
Y
T
F
�
Z
to
KI
N
ry
.2
=
W
B
0
c t
m
p^
W
E
O
m
N
A
M
r
m
th
�
O
N�
0
LL
Q
M
CAJ
Iw
N
tl
T
w
U
tl
N
m
w
O
V
m
O
U
m
a"
w
m
m
A
�
O
U
�
E
g
w
y
w
A
a
z
k
N
W
IL
x
v
w
x
E
W
�
g
u
E
a
y
E
C
O
Lj
2
�
C
m
M
T
C
w
Of
N
n
^
O
N
a
m
U
@
N
w
y
C
N
M
v1
U
n
v
N
m
w
w
v
'
2
L
VVVN
T
Y
z
ym
x
c¢
o
F
m
N
N
v
m
v
v
Y
2
�
Y
Y
Y
Y
$
-
Z E
� m
«
� §
o
k j
cn ¥ §
§
e
�
§
IL
§
§
)
CIL
\16
0 S9
/
16
0)
\
(
)
$
/
-
ca
)
§
tm
)
7
\
§
0
0
§
2
/
k
]
)
3
-
D
-
f
\
CO
k
e
�
§
IL
§
§
)
Lo
I
a
T
o z
zcnn
U
� LL
0
J T
o
ON
_�
U c
z
W
Y
O
Z
W
a
IL
A d N pp e N 0 0 0 h N 0 M N N M 0
0 N (O M O Cl e) W vJ tO � d
W
` N d V^ [O M 0 01 N O T
h
N
N N O N N O N N O N
(n
O O a O O O O o O O O
O a
O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
p
O O D O O O O O O O O O O
0
O
0
U
N
LL
d d eJ A N Oi N h N O N Opf M � 0 N M O� M M pdp rl�ppD N N m
O a A A d W N M N O 0
N N 0 N a N O
c'
O
LL'
N �� t0 10 O A g m N d`
N O O O t0
�
N N N N
a
{V
cc
O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ON
p
O O O O O O O O O O O O O
p
N
C
N
E
0
C'1 N M l7 d fG fO f0f0
h O 0 MA
1`O M W h M CJ d. A ^ Nd Ad 0d
Otp N�O AN AN MM 1�A tpNA
d1A
N
C
0
E41
On Mt0
0M N N NbM FNM
A7M
C
11.E
d0 �mO
.cJ d
O o 0 O o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O D
p
C
W
N N M
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o
p
a
�
'
N
N
111111
N N Q g d 1n 0 A D M Q 0 p p 0 N N f0 A M M A ��pp M
�
_
W N A 10 y M A O M d A
M
D
N A M W A (D f0 O A Q! Of m A A W T d O d A M M O W
O O O O O O O D � O
Qj
0
O
�-'
A d N N M N d N 0 0 N a N
O
OO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
p
p
B
N
p y
M
M
�2 0 m N N � M- N N
N
C
h
C
(V
d
N
0
I
M V N N d Col V N 0 0 d O V pj tA0 O O M m 0^ V N
d 0
(O
9
0
M O N^ C b W N fm'1 N t7
'
W
�
w
IMBo-
MNo °i N D a N �pn�T.«nN W O1 N
0
0
N N
.� 4
n M in o o M m o m y N 0 M M^ m h m y �p m
V O� t7 r O+ N M^ D O N M o N t7 N D O O!
N
�[1
M
o d N tp po o m N m o m
0 0 (Oy t'1 O M
N
to
r
W
A
d
W J a U S O U 0 O W
a x J (7 a E w M U U
N ri w z w 2 M o E
E a
w ti w U U U c� a m w x
E
W
4
d
w
w
ami
000
L z zz a E
E
❑
5 m Ecl
O
y'^. U1 � m N y N
E d
a
N %¢ m
> n m
J
lL
w z x
❑
d v E cg c e v
w N
C O Q r
C
U a O !A "N N
3 a a y 30 m m p
v
C
L Q
m m n U y w m c
o 2 2
m v m @ s W _cm mnc
A
E
% ry c p no E
M CJ U W W LL LL
D it
0 M
OI 0 0 0 0 M � N` f 0 0 n m 0' N N f' m 0 0 M
,p ik
T
N 0 �� �� 0 � � r OI �
W
W
ed-
O
Z
W
a
IL
c 04-X02- 2LC)
Federal Way School District No. 210
2002/03
Capital Facilities Plan
0 RECEIVED
NOV 2 l 2002
CITY OF KENT'
PLANNING SERVICES
Building for the 21s' Century
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002103 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
2002/03
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
BOARD OF EDUCATION
Ed Barney
Charles Hoff
Bob Millen
Don Putman
Earl VanDonen
SUPERINTENDENT
Thomas R Murphy
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002103 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ii
INTRODUCTION iii -v
SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Introduction 1
Inventory of Educational Facilities 2
Inventory of Non -Instructional Facilities 3
Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities 4
Needs Forecast - New Facilities 5
Six Year Finance Plan 6
SECTION 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
Introduction 7
Map - Elementary Boundaries 8
Map - Junior high Boundaries 9
Map - Senior High Boundaries 10
SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
Introduction
11
Building Capacities
12-13
Portable Locations
14-15
Student Forecast
16-18
Capacity Summaries
19-23
King County Impact Fee Calculations
24-26
SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2001/02 PLAN
27-29
ii
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
INTRODUCTION
In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act
(SHB 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances
of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective
December 21, 1995 as amended, and the City of Kent Ordinance No. 3260 effective
March 1996, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 2001/02 Capital Facilities Plan
as of June 2002
This Plan has been adopted by King County, the City of Kent and the City of Federal Way
and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This
plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each
,jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee
ordinance.
The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within
which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council
adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area bine
Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal
Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King
County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the
region's need for housing, lobs, services, culture and recreation This Plan's estimated
population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption.
This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any ,jurisdiction, which
requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not
intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs The District may prepare
interim plans consistent with Board policies Additional plans will be consistent with the
six year Capital Facilities Plan
iii
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
INTRODUCTION (continued)
On October 12, 1998 the Federal Way School District Board of Education approved a
recommendation to move to a Pre K-5 elementary, 6-8 middle school, and 9-12 high
school grade configuration beginning in the fall of 2003 or as additional high school space
allows This grade configuration is believed to be more responsive to student needs. It
will allow for smaller elementary enrollments with room for lower primary class sizes.
The middle school will provide more developmentally appropriate instruction and a better
acadermc transition between elementary school and high school. Middle schools will also
allow two-year preparation for the WA State 71' grade test, and matches most western
Washington Districts. With State and District standards becoming even tougher, 9t° grade
students need to be brought into the high school environment and given access to high
school subject specialist The four-year high school plan combines the 9-12 graduation
credit system, allows two-year preparation for the WA State 10`" grade test, and physically
places the high school students together
Federal Way Public Schools must meet the needs of a growing student and community
population The District must be flexible with building, programs and staffing to meet the
needs of the 21" Century, while being financially responsible and sensitive to the current
tax rates A flexible, cost effective and educationally beneficial approach that integrates
academics and high tech/high skill preparation is needed. By extending the existing debt
and creatively using new and existing facilities, the District can meet these complex needs
with no increase, on average, in local tax rates.
Federal Way citizens approved a bond proposal of $83 million in September 1999. This
bond will provide for a comprehensive high school ($44 imllion); a middle school ($17
million), expansion and improvement of existing schools ($9 million); replacement of
Truman High School ($6 million) and other general improvements ($7 million)
Additional planned improvements included in the bond proposal are parking and
pedestrian safety, playgrounds and sports fields, new classroom start-up and music
equipment, information systems and networks and emergency communications
Planned opening for the new high school is September 2003. No Board decision has been
made on the opening configuration of the new high school. There is currently a
recommendation before the Board to open the new high school with grades 9 and 10
mandatory and grades 11 and 12 opt in. This recommendation would allow 11 1h and 12 t
grade students in 2003 to finish high school in their current building. This
recommendation has substantial capacity impacts on the three existing high schools for
two years. There is a study in progress to deterrmne the feasibility of this
recommendation. Truman Iligh School will open in February of 2003.
A Middle School Transition Team began meeting in May 2001 to develop
recommendations for the middle school programs These recommendations were adopted
by the Board of Education on March 25, 2002 It is anticipated that the adopted programs
will have facility impacts In the coming months, middle school principals will present
school models to implement these changes A similar process is underway with the high
schools Facility needs will be evaluated over the next few months and any changes to
the capacity will be noted in the District's 2003/04 Capital Facilities Plan
iv
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Federal Way Public Schools opened the Internet Academy in the 1996/97 school year
This program currently serves approximately 617 students, 114 are students also served in
other Federal Way School District buildings Internet Academy has grown from about 60
students to the current 617 in six years. The forecast for this school is based on current
average annual enrollment. Historical growth has not been a reliable tool to forecast this
enrollment.
Internet Academy is currently operating out of leased space consisting of administrative
areas and a computer lab area. This capacity is not included in the analysis of instructional
spaces. The facility needs are unique to a program of "distance learners".
Federal Way Public Academy opened in the 1999/00 school year in six portables on the
Illahee Junior High site. Two additional portables were added for opening the 2000/01
school year to expand the program to include ninth grade students. The school served 180
seventh, eight and ninth grade students this year and will serve 180 — 210 students in
grades seven, eight and nine in the 2002/03 school year. The District is currently
negotiating the purchase of a building for the Federal Way Public Academy The
anticipated move to this building is in February 2003.
M
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION 1- THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered
to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing
community.
This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and
expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. This is followed by
a Financial Plan which shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and
modernization listed.
1
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002103 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
Adelaide
1635 SW 304th Street
Federal Way
98023
Brigadoon
3601 SW 336th Street
Federal Way
98023
Camelot
4041 S 298th Street
Auburn
98001
Enterprise
35101 5th Avenue SW
Federal Way
98023
Green Gables
32607 47th Avenue SW
Federal Way
98023
Lake Dolloff
4200 S 308th Street
Auburn
98001
Lake Grove
303 SW 308th Street
Federal Way
98023
Lakeland
35675 32nd Avenue S
Auburn
98001
Mark Twain
2450 S Star Lake Road
Federal Way
98003
Meredith Hill
5830 S 300th Street
Auburn
98001
Mirror Lake
625 S 314th Street
Federal Way
98003
Nautilus
1000 S 289th Street
Federal Way
98003
Olympic View
2626 SW 327th Street
Federal Way
98023
Panther Lake
34424 1 st Avenue S
Federal Way
98003
Rainier View
3015 S 368th Street
Federal Way
98003
Sherwood Forest
34600 12th Avenue SW
Federal Way
98023
Silver Lake
1310 SW 325th Place
Federal Way
98023
Star Lake
4014 S 270th Street
Kent
98032
Sunnycrest
24629 42nd Avenue S
Kent
98032
Twin Ickes
4400 SW 320th Street
Federal Way
98023
Valhalla
27847 42nd Avenue S
Auburn
98001
Wildwood
2405 S 300th Street
Federal Way
98003
Woodmont
26454 16th Avenue S.
Des Moines
98198
JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
Federal Way Public Academy
36001 Im Ave S
Federal Way
98003
Illahee
36001 1st Avenue S
Federal Way
98003
Kilo
4400 S 308th Street
Auburn
98001
Iakota
1415 SW 314th Street
Federal Way
98023
Sacalawea
1101 S Dash Point Road
Federal Way
98003
Saghalie
33914 19th Avenue SW
Federal Way
98023
Totem
26630 40th Avenue S
Kent
98032
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
Decatur
2800 SW 320th Street
Federal Way
98023
Federal Way
30611 16th Avenue S
Federal Way
98003
Thomas Jefferson
4248 S 288th Street
Auburn
98001
ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS
Merit School
31455 28th Ave S
Federal Way
98003
Harry S Truman High School
31455 28th Ave S
Federal Way
98003
LEASED SPACE
Internet Academy
32020 1' Ave S
Federal Way
98003
2
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CURRENT INVENTORY NON -INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES
Developed Property
Administrative Building
MOT Site
Central Kitchen
Federal Way Memorial Field
Leased Space
Community Resource Center
ECEAP Offices
Undeveloped Property
31405 18th Avenue S Federal Way 98003
1066 S 320th Street Federal Way 98003
1344 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003
1300 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003
1928 S Sea Tac Mall Federal Way 98003
30819 14`h Ave S Federal Way 98003
Site # I Location
23 SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW
35 S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S
40 E of 10th Avenue SW Between SW 334th & SW 335th Streets
63 E of 47th Avenue SW & SW 314th Place
71 S 344th Street & 46th Avenue S
72 36600 block of Pacific Highway S
82 1" Way S and S 342°a St
84 3737 S 360`' St
85 16`h Ave S and S 364`h Way
96 S 308`h St and 14" Ave S
Notes:
Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements.
Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the
District
3
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002103 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES
EXISTING FACILITY
FUTURE NEEDS
ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF
FUNDS
Truman Htgh School
Replacement with expansion.
Anticipated source of funds is
currently authorized bond
issues
Purchase and Relocate
Interim Capacity
Anticipated source of funds is
Portables
Impact Fees.
Decatur High School, Federal
Expansion
Anticipated source of funds is
Way High School and
currently authorized bond
Thomas Jefferson High
issues.
School
Various School Sites
Parking Safety; Network
Anticipated source of funds is
Upgrades; Automated
future bond issues.
Libraries;
Elementary Playgrounds; Ihgh
School Sports Fields;
Emergency Communications.
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
NEEDS FORECAST - NEW FACILITIES
NEW FACILITY
LOCATION
ANTICIPATED SOURCE
OF FUNDS
New I3igh School
Site 85
Anticipated source of
funds is currently
authorized bound Issues
and state matching funds.
Federal Way Public Academy
34620 9th Ave S,
Anticipated source of
Federal Way, WA
funds is state matching
funds, Impact Fees, future
bond issues and/or non -
voted debt Issues.
Additional Secondary Capacity
Unknown
Anticipated source of
funds Is state matching
funds, Impact Fees, future
bond Issues and/or non -
voted debtlssues
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Six Year Finance Plan
NEW SCHOOLS
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Total Cost
New Secondary Capacity (9)
$26,250
$233,046
$2,000,000
$3,000,000
$9,140,000
$1,000,704
$15,400,
New Senior High School (12)
$21,610,000
$18,017,263
$39,627,263
New Senior High School Site (10)
$
New Secondary Ca acct Site 11
$1,600,000
$1,600,000
Federal Way Public Academy
$3,000,000
$1,000,000
$4,000,000
MODERNIZATION AND EXPANSION
Truman Senior ffr h (Alternative)
$3,820,000
$2,134,718
$5,954,718
Ex anston Three fit h Schools
$6,029,269
$6,029,26
Ex anslon Elementary Schools
$200,000
$1,500,000
$300,000
$2,0000
TEMPORARY FACILITIES
Portables (7)
$79,000
$237,000
$316,000
OTHER
School Improvements 8) 1
$267,919
$726,000
$4,852
$998,771
Facilities Department
$250,000
$250,000
$250,000
$250,0001
$250,000
$250,0001
$1,500,
TOTAL 1
$35,282,4381
$25,461,0271
$2,554,8521
$3,250,0001
$9 90,0001
$1,487,7041
$77,426,021
NOTES
I These fees are currently being held in a King County, City of Federal Way and City of Kent impact fee account, and will be
available for use by the District for system improvements
2 These funds come from various sales of land and are set aside for estimated expenditures
3 These funds will be used for future projects
4 These are projected fees based upon known residential developments in the District over the next six years
5 These funds are projected state matching fluids
6 These funds are projected land sale income Timing of the sale of surplus property is not known at this time
7 These fees represent the cost of moving and stung existing portables and purchasing new portables The District may choose to purchase new
portables in the years shown This estimate may also include the cost of purchasing these portables
8 These projects have been approved by the Board of Directors and cover most schools These projects do not increase capacity
These projects include school networks, information and library systems, new classroom start up, elementary playgrounds and lugh school sports fields,
music equipment, emergency communication
9 New secondary capacity is the middle school component of the bond This is shown as muddle school in the impact fee calculation
The Districts researching small school solutions that will increase capacity for students in the secondary, gades
10 Site purchase for the Ngh school of $3 2 M was complete in the 2000 consular year
It Site prochase for the middle schooilsiew secondary capacity, site or sites to be determined
12 Total expenditures through the 127512001 for the Senior High School is $ 8,072,737
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION 2 - MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
Federal Way Public Schools (the District) has twenty-three elementary schools (grades K-6),
seven junior high schools (grades 7-9), three senior high schools (grades 10-12) and two
alternative schools (grades 7-12) for the 2001/02 school year The Internet Academy serves
grades K-12. On April 20, 1996, the Federal Way Public Schools Board of Education adopted
the boundaries for these schools. In May 1999, minor adjustments to elementary boundaries
were adopted The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school for each
grade level (Harry S. Truman High School, Merit School, Internet Academy and Federal Way
Public Academy serve students from throughout the District) The identified boundaries are
reviewed annually Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs which affect
school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas A Boundary Committee has
been meeting since January 2002 to develop recommended Senior High and Middle School
boundaries for 2003. A Board decision on this recommendation is anticipated at the June 25"',
2002 Board meeting. Elementary Boundaries will be studied in the 2002/03 school year.
The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility
infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public
facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that
development. School Districts are different. If the District does not have permanent facilities
available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can
be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities.
Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It is
recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools.
Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school.
It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a
complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district
and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single
development.
7
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPTIAL FACILITIES PLAN
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BOUNDARIES
iEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 210 f
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
Code -- 0 Code -- 0
10
Adelaide
C4
64 Illahee
E-9
16
Brlgadoon
&8
66 Kilo
G4
28
Camelot
08
62 Lakota
D4
22
Enterprise
D-9
M Sacapwea
E-5
14
Green Gables
A-7
70 Saghalie
C4
30
take Dn11oR
G4
68 Totem
G3
11
Lake Grove
04
6 Ment
F4
33
Lakeland
F8
2
Mark Twain
F4
29
Meredith Hill
H8
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
8
Minor Lake
E8
5
Nautilus
E4
Code
15
Olympic View
C4
21
Panther Lake
E4
80 Decatur
C8
37
Rainier View
F-10
81 Federal Way
E4
41
Sherwood Forest
D8
83 Thomas Jeflereon
GA
24
Sit"r Lake
D-7
8 Harry S Truman
F4
26
Star Lake
G3
a Merit
F4
25
Sunnycrest
G-2
13
Twin lakes
84
27
Valhalla
04
Future School Sitea —
7
Wlldwood
F-5
Surplus Sues —
'
1
Weodmom
F3
100
Educational Semi"
Center
F4
99
Future Support Services
E8' Code--.
97
MalMsnance-0PsnOwp-Traryponatbn E4 —
Parka— ''s
fEOERAL WAY- WASHWGTON and
reya0
�r `
A
7
N o —
® t;
S E
nyauewwrw
FEDERALf
aa
WAY Ao--��
resa4if�La,�a
rwa�ea Fxu�ue (253) 945-2000
10
4
2
3
Z.
U.
E
3
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPTIAL FACILITIES PLAN
Junior High School Boundaries
FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 210 1
ELEMEWARY SCHOOLS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
Code-- N Code-- E
10 Adelaide
C6
64 Manes
E4
16 Begadoon
Bd
66 Kilo
G-6
26 Camelot
Gd
62 Lakola
0-6
22 Enterprise
D-9
61 Sacajawea
E4
14 Green Gables
A-7
70 Saghalle
C6
30 Lake Doiloff
G-6
85 Totem
GJ
11 Lake Gro
Grove
D6
meet Meet
F-0
33 Lakeland
F-9
2 Mark Twain
F6
re:
w �rn'�"mw°0
29 Meredith Hill
H3
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
6Mirror Lake
E-6
5 Nautilus
E3
Code •-
15 Olympic View
C-7
xo
21 Panther Lake
E6
80 Decatur
C4
37 Rairder View
F-10
81 Federal Way
E4
41 Sherwood Forest
D4
83 Thomas Jefferson
G4
24 Silver Lake
D-7
8 Harry S Truman
F4
26 Star Lake
G3
6 Merit
F4
25 Sunn ycr at
G-2
!
13 Twin Lakes
B6
Ig
to
27 Valhalla
GA
Future School Sites —
mwr m......e..0
7 Wgdwood
F3
Surplus Sltes
..
1 Woodmont
F3
100 Educaticand Service Center F6 _
99 Future Support Services E43 _ Code-- ■
97 Maintenance -Operation -Transportation E6
Parks—
FEDERAL WAY WASHINGTON and
It OVMO
yT'
A
7
N
8
: :
re:
w �rn'�"mw°0
saasksii
e'.v.a�.awrw
xo
I
�
T
'f !
FEDERALI
WAY
!
Ig
rue.+.ea ro<nuin (253) 945-2000it
t
mwr m......e..0
2
3
r«xa
9
nu
ale
3
,4
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPTIAL FACILITIES PLAN
Senior High School Boundaries
FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 210
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
Code-- M
Code-- 0
10Adelaide
CS
64 lllahee E-9
16
Brigadoon
B5
88 K,lo G5
28
Camelot
G5
62 Lakota DS
22
Enterprise
D-9
61 Saoejawea E5
14
Green Gables
A-1
70 Saghalie CS
30
Lake Dolloff
G5
65 Totem 0•3
11
Lake Grove
D5
8 Merit FS
33
Lakeland
F-9
2
Mark Twain
FI
29
Meredith Hill
H5
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
6
Mirror Lake
ES
5Nautilus
E5
Code •-
15
Olympic view
C•7
21
Panther Lake
ES
80 Decatur CS
37
Rainier Yew
F40
81 Federal Way ES
41
Sherwood Forest
D-8
83 Thomas Jefferson GA
24
Silver Lake
0-7
8 HarryS Truman FS
26
Star Lake
GJ
8 Merit FS
25
Sunnycrest
G-2
13
Twin Lakes
BS
21
Valhalla
G4
Future School $ites —
7
Wddwood
F5
Surplus Sites —
1
Woodmont
F-3
100
Educational Service Center
FS
99
Future Support Services
_
E-8 Code-- ■
—
97
Maintenance-Operetions-Tmmporletion ES
Parkk%— 1a
. FEDERAL WAY WASHINGTON and VIC/N/7' 1 �
5 as
N
eW -
�/
W-((� _E
5
s
r �•"t
WM
WiN'SIFT
i� ��'
•i'i
0 e j i
_
.MYp.IM u.euiMrnr
� - p
r.
io
'
�
e �t
O
FEDERALI'i��,,1C[
1
WAY .,_
(253) 945-2000 i
euMmea ywn,w
1
S
3
.1.
®MM
6
3
4
n
61
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
Building Capacities - The Education Program
Portable Locations
Student Forecast - 2002 through 2007
Capacity Summaries
King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi Family Units
11
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Building Capacities
This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to
ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction
establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into
consideration the education program needs. The District has identified a Building Program
Capacity for each of the schools in the District. This Full Time Equivalent (FTE) capacity is
based on:
• The number of classrooms available in each school
• Any special requirements at each school
• The contracted class load by grade level
In general, the District's current standard provides that the average class size for a standard
classroom for grade K through grade 2 is 20 students , for grades 3-6 is 25 students and
grades 7-12 is 25 students. Gate (Gifted and Talented Education) classrooms are 25 students,
and special education classrooms are 12 students. This size is determined based upon current
ratios and trends as well as the physical size of the classroom. Educational Program
Capacities change every year. This analysis is for the 2001/02 school year. The capacity of
an individual school could and does change at any time depending on program changes which
may require additional space.
12
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITIES
ELEMENTARY BUILDING JUNIOR HIGH BUILDING
PROGRAM CAPACITY PROGRAM CAPACITY
Adelaide
441
Bn adoon
487
Camelot
357
Enterprise
405
Green Gables
432
Lake Dolloff
475
Lake Grove
430
Lakeland
447
Mark Twain
500
Meredith Hill
417
Mirror Lake
372
Nautilus
485
Olympic View
409
Panther Lake
409
Rainier View
417
Sherwood Forest
487
Silver Lake
487
Star Lake
450
Sunnycrest
409
Twin Lakes
447
Valhalla
462
Wildwood
442
Woodmont
360
2001 TOTAL
10,027
Elementary Average 1 436
Notes
Illahee
821
Kilo
854
Lakota
741
Saca awea
828
Sa hahe
768
Totem
709
2001 TOTAL
4,721
tumor High Average 787
SENIOR HIGH BUILDING
PROGRAM CAPACITY
Decatur 1,276
Federal Way
1,532
Thomas Jefferson
1,462
2001 TOTAL
4,270
Senior High Average 1,423
ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL BUILDING
PROGRAM CAPACITY
Merit School 1
Truman High School 194
2001 TOTAL 210
Elementary program capacities are based on the number of teaching stations
in the building, contracted class size, and special use classrooms in place
during the 01/02 school year All available instructional space is calculated
Secondary program capacities are based on peak loading
The calculation is based on 25 students per available
teaching stations
13
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Portable Locations
The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic
education. It is not efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for
500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the
year and from year to year.
Portables are used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students until
permanent facilities can be built or boundary adjustments can be made. When permanent
facilities become available, the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or
child care programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom Some portables
may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition In these cases, the District may
choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. It is the practice and
philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that portables are not acceptable as permanent
facilities.
The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for temporary
educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools.
M
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
PORTABLE LOCATIONS
PORTABLES LOCATED PORTABLES LOCATED
AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS AT SENIOR HIGHS
PORTABLESLOCATED
AT JUNIOR HIGHS
INSTRUCTIONAL
NON
INSTRUCTIONAL
Adelaide
3
1
Bri adoon
1
Truman
Camelot
1
1
Enterprise
3
Green Gables
1
Lake Dolloff
2
Lake Grove
2
Lakeland
2
Mark Twain
3
2
Meredith Hill
3
Mirror Lake
4
Nautilus
1
Olympic View
2
Panther Lake
3
Rainier View
3
Sherwood Forest
4
Silver Lake
4
Star Lake
4
Sunn crest
1
1
Twin Lakes
2
1
Valhalla
2
W ildwood
4
Woodmont
3
TOTAL
58
2
PORTABLESLOCATED
AT JUNIOR HIGHS
15
INSTRUCTIONAL
NON
INSTRUCTIONAL
Federal Way Public Academy
8
1
lllahee
3
Truman
Kilo
3
1
Lakota
3
Saca awea
3
Sa habe
4
Totem
5
TOTAL
29
2
15
PORTABLES LOCATED
AT SUPPORT FACILITIES
MOS
NON
INSTRUCTIONAL INMUC1 ONAL
Decatur
4
Federal Way
1
Thomas Jefferson
2
Truman
4 1
Merit
4
TOTAL
J7 13 1
PORTABLES LOCATED
AT SUPPORT FACILITIES
MOS
1
Clothm Bank
1
TOTAL
2
HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES
Mucor Lake 1
Sherwood Forest 1
Total 2
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002103 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Student Forecast
Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment
projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The
majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students.
Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected
enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to
enrollment projections.
Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department.
Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school -building totals, grade level
and program level to include vocational and special education students.
The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis Cohort survival is the analysis of
a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a
stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical
information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not
trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The
district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study
several projections Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student
migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates Entry grades
(kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on
birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for
kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years.
The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student
enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below.
The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are
forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years
of historical information and how they are weighted
A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows
the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections
for the district level The Enrollment Masteirm software provides statistical methods
including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods.
This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment.
In November of 2001, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal
Way School District. The report was complete in January 2002. The model used to forecast next
year's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, assumes market share
losses to private schools (consistent with county -wide average), assumes growth from new housing
or losses due to net losses from migration This forecast was provided as a range of three
projections The report substantiated that for next year, Federal Way expects little or no growth
16
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
The long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth
rates based on projected changes in the 5-19 age group for King County. Most of the methods used
for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of something else
(e g, population) or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend for the school-age population
over time The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for
the District to the year 2015. This model produces a projection that is between 24,000 and 26,000
when applied to the low, medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-
range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models
Short-term budget projections may be more conservative than the standard grade progression
model. For the 2002/03 school year, the district chose the Enrollment Master projection
using standard grade progression model complemented by the work from the contracted
report. Standard grade progression is a reasonably accurate method for the near term future
when the near future looks much like the near past
Long range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort
survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the
projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied
annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they
project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by
Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the
projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington.
Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The
Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions
comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school
district in the future.
17
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections
Simplified FTE (K Headcount = 5
FTE, Junior High FfE= 989 Headcount,
Senior High FTE = 933Headcount)
Total K -12
Perces
School Year
Elementary
Junior High
Senior Ihgh
FTE
Chan
1995-96
10,689
4,838
3,796
19,323
1996-97
10,863
4,930
3,913
19,706
19%
1997-98
11,123
5,073
4,082
20,278
28%
1998-99
11,480
5,080
4,120
20,680
19%
1999-00
11,622
5,110
4,348
21,079
19%
2000-01
11,640
5,300
4,390
21,330
12%
2001-02
11,498
5,331
4,415
21,244
-04%
P2002-03
11,234
5,419
4,588
21,241
00%
P2003-04
9,333
5,501
6,420
21,254
0.1%
P2004-05
9,297
5,562
6,462
21,321
0.3%
P2005-06
9,307
5,506
6,534
21,347
01%
P2006-07
9,390
5,374
6,642
21,406
03%
P2007-08
9,637
5,300
6,748
21,685
13%
► New Configuratiors
ElementaryK-5
Muddle School 6.8
High School9-12
23,000
22,000
21,000
0 20,000
9
R
x 19,000
18,000
O
17,000
16,000
15,000
Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast
30%
25%
20%
15%
0
05%
00%
-05%
10%
! !
opo` o`9m
t4s i9., 'so mo bob! bP oc, ow oq' 0
ob
�
School Year
W.
FTE --*-Percent of Change J
i'
171
f
10Jgyti
30%
25%
20%
15%
0
05%
00%
-05%
10%
! !
opo` o`9m
t4s i9., 'so mo bob! bP oc, ow oq' 0
ob
�
School Year
W.
FTE --*-Percent of Change J
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Capacity Summaries
All Grades, Elementary, Junior Mgh/Nhddle School, and Senior high Schools
The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information and the Student Forecast
information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and
why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures
The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire
District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, junior high, and
senior high levels individually
The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in
place each year.
19
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACITY SUMMARY - ALL GRADES
ENROLLMENT
Basic FPE Enrollment
Actual
2,462
- -
Projected
- -
21,406
2,325
CAPACITY
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
BUILDING PROGRAM
20,933
20,930
20,943
21,010
21,036
21,095
CAPACITY
19,228
19,228
(186)
20,017
19,991
21,381
21,355
21,845
Adjusted Portable Capacity
2,462
12,325
2,325
2,325
2,325
2,325.
2,395
Add or subtract changes to capacity
a
Special Education Changes
(26)
rl
(26)
(26)
(16)
Truman High modemization and expansion
98
c
Increase Capacity at Three High Schools
372
Addtional Secondary Capacity
490
Federal Way Public Academy
34$
New High School
C
1,416
Adjusted Program Capacity
19,228
20,017
19,991
21,381
21,355
21,845
21,845
ENROLLMENT
Basic FPE Enrollment
21,244
2,462
21,254
21,321
1
21,406
2,325
Internet Academy Enrollment
311
121,Z41
311
311
311
121,347
311
311
121,685
311
Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy
20,933
20,930
20,943
21,010
21,036
21,095
21,374
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
1
2,462
2,325
1
1
2,325
2,325
PROGRAM CAPACITY
(1,705)
1 (913)
(952)
371
319
750
471
RELOCATABLE CAPACITY
Current Portable Capacity
2,462
2,462
2,325
2,325
2,325
2,325
2,325
Add/Subtract Portable Capacity
1
1
1
1
Add New Portable Capacity
757
49
1,373
2,696
2,644
3,075
70.
Deduct Portable Capacity
(186)
Adjusted Portable Capacity
2,462
12,325
2,325
2,325
2,325
2,325.
2,395
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE
1
1
1
1
CAPACITY
757
1,412
1,373
2,696
2,644
3,075
2,866
20
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACITY SUMMARY - ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
CAPACITY
BUILDING PROGRAM
CAPACITY
1 Special Education Changes
ENROLLMENT
Actual
11,498
Z
8
Prole(
2001
2002
2003
2004
2 Internet Academy
58
58
1
1,450
58
58
(1
58
1
58
1
10,027
10,027
y
10,001
9,975
9,239
9,249
e
9,579
A
'
(26)
(26)
(26)
m
C
e
WIN
9,949 1 9,923 1 9,923
(26)
Basic FTE Enrollment
11,498
11,234
9,333
9,297
9,307
9,390
9,637
2 Internet Academy
58
58
1
1,450
58
58
58
58
1
58
1
Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy
11,440
11,176
9,275 1
9,239
9,249
9,332
9,579
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
PROGRAM CAPACITY
(1,413)
(1,175)
1,450
700
710
674
591
344
RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3
Current Portable Capacity
Add/Subtract portable capacity
1,450
1,450
1,450
1,450
1,450
1,450
1,450
Adjusted Portable Capacity
1,450
1 1,450
1,450
1 1,450
1,450
1,450
1,450
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE
1
1
1
1
1
CAPACITY
37
275
2,150
2,160
2,124
2,041
1,794
NOTES:
1 Add Programs 2 ECEAP, 1 SBD (Severely Behavioral Disordered) and 1 Pre -School Program
This reduces Basic Education capacity in the school years indicated
2 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities
3 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and
other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily
house students until permanent facilities are available Tlus is a
calculated number only The actual number of portables that will be used
will be based upon actual population needs
21
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACITY SUMMARY - MIDDLE SCHOOLS
CAPACITY
BUILDING PROGRAM
CAPACITY
1 Federal Way Public Academy
2 Addtional Secondary Capacity
ENROLLMENT
esuuw
5,331
S
- -
uu�ct,wu
- -
51506
5,374
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
140
1
140
1
140
1
Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy
5,191
5,279
4,721
4,721
5,366
4,933
4,933
4,933
4,933
5,423
759
a
759
759
759
A
212
490
m
c
0
Basic FTE Enrollment
5,331
5,419
5,501
5,562
51506
5,374
5,300
3 Internet Academy
140
140
1
140
140
1
140
1
140
1
140
1
Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy
5,191
5,279
5,361
5,422
5,366
5,234
5,160
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
1
1
759
1
1
759
759
PROGRAM CAPACITY
(470)
(346)
(428)
(489)
(433)
189
263
RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 4
Current Portable Capacity
710
710
759
759
759
759
759
Add/Subtract portable capacity
1
1
1
1
5 Add new portable capacity
240
49
331
270
326
948
1,022
Adjusted Portable Capacity
710
1 759
759
1 759
759
759
759
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE
1
1
1
1
CAPACITY
240
413
331
270
326
948
1,022
NOTES:
1 Federal Way Public Academy Grades 6, 7 and 8
2 Add additional secondary capacity
3 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full tune use of school facilities
4 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and
other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily
house students until permanent facilities are available This is a
calculated number only The actual number of portables that will be used
will be based upon actual population needs
5 Add portable capacity to Sacalawea Junior High
22
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACITY SUMMARY - SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
CAPACITY
2001
2002
z
8
2003
BUILDING PROGRAM
6,534
6,642
6,748
CAPACITY
4,453
4,453
0
5,056
113
1
1 I3
1
113
m
Basic Ed without Internet Academy
4,302
4,475
a
6,349
Add or subtract changes in capacity
6,529
6,635
A
0
1 Truman Remodel
98
2 Add Capacity to Three High Schools
372
302
116
3 Federal Way Public Academy
116
133
'm
186
4 Add New High School
0
1,416
0
Adjusted Program Capacity
4,453
1 5,056
6,472
ENROLLMENT
6,472 1 6,472 1 6,472 1 6,472
Basic FTE Enrollment
4,415
4,588
6,420
6,462
6,534
6,642
6,748
5 Internet Academy
I 13
113
1
113
113
1
1 I3
1
113
113
Basic Ed without Internet Academy
4,302
4,475
6,307
6,349
6,421
6,529
6,635
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
302
1
1
116
1
116
1
PROGRAM CAPACITY
1 151
581
165
123
51
1 (57)
(163)
RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 6
Current Portable Capacity
302
302
116
116
116
116
116
Add\Subtract portable capacity
1
1
1
1
7 Add new portable capacity
453
697
281
239
167
59
70
8 Deduct Portable Capacity
(186)
Adjusted Portable Capacity
302
116
116
116
116
116
186
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE
1
1
1
1
CAPACITY
453
697
281
239
167
59
23
NOTES:
1 Truman High School modernization and expansion
2 Add capacity to three existing high schools
3 Federal Way Public Academy - Grades 9 and 10
4 Add new high school
5 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities
6 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and
other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily
house students until permanent facilities are available This is a
calculated number only The actual number of portables that will be used
will be based upon actual population needs
7 Add portable capacity to high school
8 Portables at Truman and Ment will be demolished
23
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
King County, the City of Federal Way, and the City of Kent Impact Fee Calculations
Single and Multi -Family Residences
Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to
help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities.
To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was
established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substantially
adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a
"Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school
district by each new single or multi -family unit and to gather some standard construction
costs, which are unique to that district.
- STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS
Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single
family units and multi -family units. The factors used in the 2002/03 Capital Facilities Plan
were derived using actual generation factors from single family units and multi -family units,
which were constructed in the last five (5) years.
-IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
Following the calculations for the student generation factor is a copy of the Impact Fee
Calculation for single family and multi -family units based on King County Code 21A and the
Growth Management Act
➢ Temporary Facility Cost is the average cost of a portable purchased within the last 12
months.
➢ Site Acquisition Costs is the per acre cost of the last school site purchased (site 85), this
is a negotiated purchase price.
Plan Year 2002/03 Plan Year 2001/02
Collection Year 2002/03 Collection Year 2001/02
Single Family Units $3,894. $2,616.
Multi -Family Units $1,094. $ 896.
0
_ .
m m omy
Ovcon
t�00)
FQ.
-n
t9im
Mc7
WNw
Naomro
t0o2
m�
m
I L-
000000000
OJ
V O
N
w
r
0
M'
W
O
O= W
LL
n
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
0
M
0
V
N
0
too
M
0
{y
b
� N
fA
O
O
U d 0
(n a V
o
N
m
O
w
n-
7
n
N
n-
N
n
N
O
tM�
Gq0
PD
N
M
0
O
O
N
N
N
N
N
�
HX
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
a
S
d '00 V
too
7
M
N
W
00
M
EZ
b
WWWOOOOOOOOOO
W
L
p W N
d Q a
EE=
Z = N N
O
O U
C
d=
M
N
N
K
N
o
M
t0
n
Z 9 N
O m w
C
E E
= m N
Z {L
T 0
O
d m C
ELL m
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Z �
T
o E m
d LL C
°i
N
.�
D)
7
o
N
m
N
n
N
.-
00
0
E m 3
Z c o
w
r
`o
z
w
�
0
X
m
a
d
w
a
tp
0O
0
ZY
to
O
m
0
O
W
.'
_0
y,
y:
ma
$�
d
O¢
O
w
o°
'�
0-6
m
.c
°
E
a
v
G
Lv
L
°-
Ln
.x
m
m
t$
to
g
m
u
c
o
o
in
o
x3'>o�=m
in
c7
0000mm�i
Pimm
N
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
IMPACT FEE
School Site Acquisition Cost: Student Student
Facility Cost / Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/
Acreaae Acre Cacacity SFR MFR SFR MFR
Elementary
1 Middle School
2 Sr HtgIt
i Middle School
000. $0_ 436 02644
21 80 $87,747 706 0 1889
............... ............................ .............. ...............
4120 $82,733 1,558 0 2111
Federal Way Public Acacdemy - 6 of 3 acre parcel
00738
0 0512
0 0594
TOTAL
$0
$0
$512
$139
$462
$130
$974
$269
2 Sr High Federal Way Public Acacdemy - 4 of 3 acre parcel
School Construction Cost: Student Student
Perm Fac / Facility Facility Factor Factor
Total So Ft Cost Canacity SFR MFR
Elementary
I Middle School
'Sr High
I Middle School
Cost/ Cost/
SFR MFR
9612%
9612%
9612%
$0
$17,687,100
$44,991,400
436
706
1,558
02644
01889
02111
00738
00512
00594
$0 $0
$4,549 $1,233
$5,860 $1,649
Additional secondary Capacity - $15,400,000 - Capacity 490 TOTAL
$10,408 $2,882
Federal Way Public Academy - $2,4001 $2,287,100
2 Sr High New Semor High - $43,800,000 - Capacity 1414
Federal Way Public Academy -$1,6001 $1,191,400
Temporary Facility Cost: Student Student
%Temp Fac Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/
Total So Ft Cost Size SFR MFR SFR MFR
Elementary
Middle School
Sr High
3 88%
3 88%
3 88%
$0
$79,695
$0
25
49
23
02644
0 1889
0 211 ]
0 0738
0 0512
0 0594
$0 $0
$12 $3
$0 $0
TOTAL
$12 1 $3
State Matching Credit Calculation:
Boeck Cost/ Sq Ft
So Ft Student
Elementary
Middle School
New Sr I[igh
Student
Student
State Factor
Factor
Match SFR
MFR
Cost/ Cost/
SFR MFR
$110 3280
$110 32
$11032
110
..............
I120
9.9
000%
..............
6091%
0 2644
0 1889
..............
02111
0 0738
0 0512
.'--•--......--
00594
$0 $0
$0$0
$1,702 $479
Total
$1,702 $479
Tax Payment Credit Calculation
Average Assessed Value (April 2002)
Capital Bond Interest Rate (May 2002)
Net Present Value of Average Dwelling
Years Amortized
Property Tax Levy Rate
Present Value of Revenue Stream
Single Family Multi -Family
Residences Residences
Mitigation Fee Summary
SFR MFR
$188,430
$48.281
.__........
519%
._.
5 19% ,
$1,44.....
$369....
$
10,408
.......0 ....................
$132
$132
$1,903
$488
Site Acquisition Cost
$
974
$
269
Permanent Facility Cost
$
10,408
$
2,882
Temporary Facility Cost
$
12
$
3
State Match Credit
$
(1,702)
$
(479)
Tax Payment Credit
$
(1,903)
$
(488)
Sub -Total
$
7,789
$
2,187
50% Local Share
$
3,894
$
1,094
Im act Fee
$
3,894
$
1,094
26
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION 4
SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2001/02 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
The 2002/03 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document, based on the 2001/02 Capital
Facilities Plan The changes between the 2001/02 Plan and the 2002/03 Plan are listed
below.
SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACII.ITIES PLAN
CURRENT INVENTORY — UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY
Site 82 is added This is a small piece of property not sold when the rest of the site was sold
This site was not shown in previous Capital Facility Plans
NEEDS FORECAST — NEW FACILITIES
Permanent capacity for Federal Way Public Academy is added
SIX YEAR FINANCE PLAN
The Six Year Finance Plan has been rolled forward to reflect 2002/2007
27
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION III - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
CAPACITY
Elementary school capacity reflects the change in average class size, K through 2nd grade at
20 and 3 through 6`h grade at 25. The average capacity of senior high schools is increased
from 1372 to 1414. This change is a result of analysis of current building use and programs
in place for the 2001/02 school year. Building Program Capacities are found on page 13
PORTABLES
The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables
purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page 15.
STUDENT FORECAST
The Student Forecast now covers 2002 through 2007. The new forecast reflects a decreased
rate of growth Enrollment 11i story and Projections are found on page I8.
CAPACITY SUMMARY
The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and
student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as
increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 20-23.
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY CODE 21A
The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors The adjustment
made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 2001/02
Capital Facilities Plan and the 2002/03 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page 29.
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002103 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2001/02 TO 2002/03
STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS
Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a
period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in
student Generation factors between the 2001/02 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2002/03
Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age
of the developments. Student allocation is also changed to reflect the middle school
configuration. The Student General worksheet is found on page 25.
IMPACT FEE
Item From/To Comment
Percent of Permanent Facilities 96.56 to Report #3 OSPI
96.12%
Percent Temporary Facilities 3.44% to
3.88% Updated portable inventory
Temporary Facility Cost
$68,005. to
Updated cost of most recently
$79,695.
purchased portables
Boeck Cost/Sq. Ft
$103.55 to
Change per OSPI
$110.32
State Match
6174% to
Change per OSPI
60.91%
Average Assessed Value
SFR -
Per Puget Sound Educational Service
$176,267 to
District (ESD 121)
$188,430
MFR —
$49,627 to
$48,281
Capital Bond Interest Rate 5.25% to Market Rate
5.19%
Property Tax Levy Rate $1.46 to King County Treasury Division
$1.32
29
EXHIBIT D
2003 - 2008 Capital Improvement Program
Sources of Funds
Amounts In 000's
Street Fund
Councilmanic Bond 12%
Proceeds
3%
Utility Funds
30%
Voted Public Safety
Bonds
32%
Capital Improvement
Other Funding Fund
Sources Grants 13%
3% 7%
Sources of Funds
Capital Improvement Fund
Grants
Other Funding Sources
Voted Public Safety Bonds
Councilmanic Bond Proceeds
Street Fund
Utility Funds
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total
2,130
2,691
2,629
2,760
2,818
2,878
15,906
1,599
1,444
809
1,649
1,564
1,059
8,124
1,185
692
734
90
241
342
3,284
40,000
40,000
4,000
4,000
1,945
2,775
2,679
2,171
2,224
2,468
14,262
5,214
10,454
8,004
4,005
5,063
3,764
36,503
Total Sources of Funds 12,073 22,056 54,855 10,675 11,910 10,511 122,079
Proposed 2004 Bond Proceeds of $11,200,000 for Facilities, Parks and Street protects are not Included in this plan.
Proposed 2008 Bond Proceeds of $38,025,000 for Public Works Maintenance Facility, Street and Utility protects are not Included in this plan
Page 1 of 6
44
cw CIP 6yr plan 03 As xls 10/29/2002
2003 - 2008 Capital Improvement Program
Projects Forecast
Amounts in 000's
Transportation
11%
Utility Fund Project
28%
Projects
Transportation
Public Safety
Parks, Recreation
& Community Services
General Government
Utility Fund Projects
Total Projects
Public Safety
34%
Parks, Recreation
& Community
Development
18%
General
Government
9%
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total
1,845
2,675
2,579
2,071
2,124
2,368
13,662
200
150
40,150
150
150
150
40,950
4,384
3,962
3,302
3,554
3,678
3,334
22,234
730
5.095
1,120
1,195
1,195
1,195
10,530
4,914
10,154
7,704
3,705
4,763
3,464
34,703
12,073
22,056
54,855
10,675
11,910
10,511
122,079
Proposed 2004 Bond Proceeds of $11,200,000 for Facilities, Parks and Street projects are not Included In this plan
Proposed 2006 Bond Proceeds of $38,025,000 for Public Works Maintenance Facility, Street and Utility projects are not included in this plan
Page 2 of 6
45
cev CIP 6yr plan 03 As As 1D129=02
Page 3 of 6
46
cw 2003 Totals As rix 10rlAMW
TRANSPORTATION
2003-2008
CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
AMOUNTS IN 000's
Total
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Sources of Funds
Street Fund
13,662
1,845
2,675
2,579
2,071
2,124
2,368
Total Sources of Funds
13,662
1,845
2,675
2,579
2,071
2,124
2,368
Protects Funded
Corridors
228th Corridor- West Corridor
750
400
350
Arterlais
212th Street Rehab
223
223
84th Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation
300
300
116th Ave Imp (256th- KK(SR516))
1,000
500
500
Central Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation
375
375
Intersection & Road Improvements
72nd Avenue (196th -200th)
500
500
248th Street Improvements
400
400
1-5 & 277th Intersection Improvement
1,500
500
1,000
Military Rd & 260th Intersection Improve
900
200
700
116th & 248th Signal
250
250
124th & 248th Signal
250
250
Other Improvements
Miscellaneous Asphalt Overlays
3,431
517
538
560
582
605
629
Slurry Seal Program
425
75
75
75
75
50
75
Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Installation
1,800
300
300
300
300
300
300
Neighborhood Traffic Control
225
75
75
75
City Wide Guardrail & Safety Improvement
180
30
30
30
30
30
30
Street Striping Program
493
50
87
89
89
89
89
Signal Battery Backup
360
120
120
120
Bike Paths
300
50
50
50
50
50
50
Total Projects Funded
13,662
1,845
2,675
2,579
2,071
2,124
2,368
Page 3 of 6
46
cw 2003 Totals As rix 10rlAMW
OTHER GOVERNMENT PROJECTS
2003-2008 DEPARTMENT REQUESTS
AMOUNTS IN 000's
Public Safety
Police
Total
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Proposed Revenue
575
200
75
75
75
75
75
Capital Improvement Fund
5,080
530
845
870
945
945
945
From Utility & Street Funds
2,400
400
400
4D0
400
400
400
Voted Public Safety Bons
40,000
1D0
250
40,000
300
3D0
300
Total Proposed Revenue .
47,480
930
1,245
41,270
1,345
1,345
1,345
Public Safety
Police
375
75
75
75
75
75
Fire
575
200
75
75
75
75
75
Other Public Safety Projects
40,000
40,000
Subtotal Public Safety
40,950
200
150
40,150
150
150
150
Facilities
1,500
1D0
250
250
300
3D0
300
Golf Renovations
270
45
45
45
45
45
45
Miscellaneous Projects
510
85
50
75
1D0
100
100
Vanous Department Equipment
250
50
50
50
50
50
Automation Projects
8,000
500
4,700
700
700
700
700
Subtotal General Government
10,530
730
5,095
1,120
1,195
1,195
1,195
Total Projects Funded 51,480 930 5,245 41,270 1,345 1,345 1,345
Page 4 of 6
47
tw 2003 Totals xis As 10/29/2002
Soarer Field Renovation
PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
700
2003.2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Soccer Field Development
500
500
AMOUNTS IN 000's
Service Club BalBields
TOTAL 2003 2004
2005
2006
2007
2009
cos of Funds
Service Club Park Acquisition
11000
2nd GO
10,451 1,600 1,771
1,684
1,740
1,798
1,858
rant Matching
375 75
75
75
75
75
thou
200 150 -
-
50
100
Rees
270 130 85
55
-
-
axWCorxribuawns
410 155 135
5
5
105
5
Grant
10 10
-
-
-
75
Sports King CaxxyGrant
450 50 300
50
-
5o
rams
4,845 915 455
450
1,075
900
1,050
y Grants
1,590 550 40
50D
500
640
Gram
375 65 140
-
65
105
Grants
854 9 509
309
9
9
9
a" FarWxg
1,300 750 200
350
1,050
50
1,000
Funding Sources1,104
272
324
85
86
337
Sources of Funds
X32 T 4;384 3,982
3
550
Soarer Field Renovation
700
700
Soccer Field Development
500
500
Service Club BalBields
2,315
900
1,415
Service Club Park Acquisition
11000
1,000
East Hill Youth Spoils Complex
1,206
151
151
451
151
151
151
Commons Piayheld Renovations
1,190
100
1,090
Park Development
Land Acquisition
375
75
75
75
75
75
Uplands Playrield Improvements
40
40
228% Corridor Park7rmilhead (Russ
50
50
Skate Park Development
640
630
10
International Parks Acquisftlon/Deve
40
40
Town Square Park
1,050
50
1,000
Rrverwalk / Riverview Park Developl
595
45
550
Clark Lake Development
2,450
400
750
1,300
Clark Lake Land Acquisition
1,000
1,000
Clark Lake Management Plan
1 DD
50
50
West Hill Amphitheater
80
10
70
Green River Corridor Acquisition
500
500
East HIII Park Land Acquisition
500
500
Neighborhood Parks Development
Canterbury Park Development
15
15
West Hill Park Development (SeaN
777
77
700
132nd Street Park Development
834
84
750
S 272nd SL Neighborhood Park De,
670
84
586
Turnkey Park Acquisition & Parking 1
250
175
75
Panther Lake Neighborhood Park A(
310
310
Morrill Meadows Park Acqusrhon
300
240
60
Glenn Nelson ImprovementstUrban
260
260
Major Capital & Lifecycle Renovations
Downtown Sidewalk Replacement/G
180
90
90
Springwood Park Improvements
65
65
Seven Oaks Park Improvements
65
65
West Fenwok Renovations
352
35
17
300
Kiwams Tot Lot 81 Improvements
65
65
Kwanls Tot Lot 114 Play Equipment
65
65
Tudor Square Renovations
55
55
Pine Tree Park Improvements
618
18
600
Life Cycle
1,500
250
250
250
250
250
250
Demolition of Rental Houses
75
50
25
Van Doren's Park Improvements
75
75
Botanical Garden
10
10
Big Blue Mobile Computer Lab
85
85
Off -Leash Park
24
9
15
TreO improvements
54
9
9
9
9
9
9
Kent Commons
600
600
Kent Memorial Park Renovations
74
74
Planning -Architecture & Engineering
Architect/Engineering
145
20
25
25
25
25
25
Master Plans
60
10
10
10
10
10
10
Swimmmg Pool Feasibility Study
25
25
East Hill Crew Malnt Bldg
10
10
Vandalism Prevention Program
6
6
Van Doren's Park River Access
20
20
Adapt -a -Park
240
40
40
40
40
40
40
Planned Giving Program
19
19
Total Projects
22,234
4,384
3,982
3,302
3,554
3,678
3,334
Page 5 of 6
iW
WATER, SEWER AND STORMWATER DRAINAGE
2003 - 2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
AMOUNTS IN 000's
Page 6 of 6
cw 2003 Totals As As 10128/2002
Total
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Sources of Funds
Water Fund
15,459
1,734
6,281
4,091
700
1,904
749
Drainage Utility Fund
15,298
2,413
3,082
3,050
2,420
2,251
2,083
Sewer Utility Fund
3,946
767
791
562
585
608
633
Total Sources of Funds
34,703
4,914
10,154
7,704
3,705
4,763
3,464
Projects Funded
Sanitary Sewer
Remote Telemetry Upgrades - Phase II & III
47
47
-
-
-
-
Miscellaneous Sewer Replacements
3,449
520
541
562
585
608
633
248th Street Sewer Extension
200
200
-
-
-
-
-
Sewer Extension for Easthill Shop
250
250
-
Total Sanitary Sewer
3,946
767
791
562
585
608
633
Stormwater Drainage Management
Remote Telemetry Upgrades - Phase II & III
47
47
Garrison Creek
144
144
NPDES Permit
100
50
50
Outfall Treatment Facilities
876
876
Horseshoe Acres Pump Station
30
10
10
10
Spnngbrook Creek
150
150
Miscellaneous Drainage
4,522
667
712
740
770
801
833
Soos Creek Basin Improvements
5,679
419
1,460
1,000
900
950
950
Easthill Shop
100
100
72nd Avenue (196th - 200th)
500
500
Military & 260th Intersection Improvement
100
100
1-5 & 277th Intersection Improvement
300
300
124th Ave & 248th Street Improvement
250
250
228th Corridor
1,500
750
750
116th Ave Improvements (256th to Kent Kangle)
1,000
500
500
Total Stormwater Drainage
15,298
2,413
3,082
3,050
2,420
2,251
2,083
Water Projects
East Hill Reservoir
2,850
500
1,050
1,300
Tacoma Interhe
7,935
4,624
2,159
43
1,070
39
Miscellaneous Water improvements
3,317
500
520
541
563
585
608
Remote Telemetry Upgrades - Phase 1
140
140
3 -Year Lrg Mtr & Vault Replacement Program
225
34
35
37
38
40
41
Update Kent's Water Comprehensive Plan
150
150
Hydrant Replacement Program
332
50
52
54
56
59
61
Clark Springs HCP
300
300
Clark Springs Fencing
60
60
Pump Station #5 Generation
75
75
Portable Generator
75
75
Total Water
15,459
1,734
6,281
4,091
700
1,904
749
Total Projects Funded
34,703
4,914
10,154
7,704
3,705
4,763
3,464
Page 6 of 6
cw 2003 Totals As As 10128/2002