HomeMy WebLinkAbout3608ORDINANCE NO. 310 �?
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City
of Kent, Washington, establishing a Planned Action for a
site approximately 25 0 acres in size, bound by James and
Hanson Streets, 4`h Avenue and 15` Avenue, as described
in the adopted Kent Station Supplemental Environmental
Impact Statement.
WHEREAS, the Governor's Task Force on Regulatory Reform
recommended changes to state law that would enable local governments to consolidate
environmental review of plans prepared under the Washington State Growth
Management Act (GMA), and
WHEREAS, both the State Environmental Policy Act ("SEPA") and
Chapter 36 70B Revised Code of Washington ("RCW") provide for the integration of
environmental review with protect review through the establishment of "Planned
Actions", and
WHEREAS, Planned Actions expedite the permitting process where
substantial planning and environmental analysis have been done prospectively for
specific geographic areas that are less extensive than the municipality's jurisdictional
boundaries or that are for certain types of development, and
1 Planned Action Ordinance —
Kent Station SEIS
WHEREAS, RCW 43 21C 031 and Washington Administrative Code
("WAC") 197-11-164, -168, and -172 allow for and govem the application of a
Planned Action designation, and
WHEREAS, City of Kent Ordinance No 3222 adopted a
Comprehensive Plan (April 1995), under the provisions of Chapter 36 70A RCW, that
includes goals and policies for Kent's downtown area; and
WHEREAS, City of Kent Ordinance No 3398 adopted the Downtown
Strategic Action Plan and Integrated Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement in
1998 as an amendment to the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan, in compliance with
the requirements of the GMA to direct growth into urban centers that provide a mix of
residential, commercial, educational, and recreational land uses served by a multi-
modal transportation system, and
WHEREAS, the City of Kent Downtown Strategic Action Plan provides
a basis for master planning and environmental analysis for the subsequent adoption of
a Planned Action Ordinance for the Downtown Kent subarea, and its component
districts, and
WHEREAS, City of Kent Ordinance 3543, passed on February 20,
2001, rezoned lands previously designated as Downtown Commercial Limited
Manufacturing (DLM) within Downtown Kent to Downtown Commercial Enterprise
(DCE) and recognized the variety of functions Downtown Kent will be expected to
provide as a designated Urban Center pursuant to King County county -wide planning
policies for population, employment and services; and
WHEREAS, on February 8, 2001, the City purchased the Borden
Chemical site, and
2 Planned Action Ordinance—
Kent Station SEIS
WHEREAS, the Sound Transit Commuter Rail Station began operation
in the City of Kent on February 5, 2001, and the presence of this transit service is
consistent with and would enhance mixed-use development on the Planned Action site,
and
WHEREAS, the City of Kent over the years has provided an ongoing
opportunity for public participation and review process for preparation of its
Comprehensive Plan, the Downtown Strategic Action Plan and Integrated
Environmental Impact Statement, and the Kent Station Planned Action Ordinance, and
WHEREAS, on July 9, 2002 the Kent City Council Planning
Committee held a public meeting on this Planned Action Ordinance to allow an
opportunity for public comment as required by WAC 197-11-168, and
WHEREAS, the Kent Station Planned Action Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement (hereafter "SEIS") identifies impacts and mitigation
measures associated with the planned development, and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance would designate certain land uses and
activities as Planned Actions" that would be consistent with the Downtown
Commercial Enterprise zoning district designations within Downtown Kent. NOW,
THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS
SECTION 1. - Pur ose The City Council declares that the purpose of this
ordinance is to
3 Planned Action Ordinance—
Kent Station SEIS
A Combine environmental analysis with land use planning, and
B. Streamline and expedite the land use permit process by relying on completed
and existing detailed environmental analysis for certain land uses allowed in
Downtown Kent, and
C. Set forth a procedure designating certain protect actions within Downtown
Kent as Planned Actions consistent with RCW 43 21C 031; and
D Provide the public with an understanding of Planned Actions and how the City
will process Planned Actions, and
E. Adopt the SEIS as a Planned Action document that provides a framework for
encouraging development proposals within the Planned Action Area described
in Section 3(A) ("Planned Action Projects") that are consistent with the goals
and policies of the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan and the City of Kent
Downtown Strategic Action Plan, as they apply to a portion of the North Core
District of Downtown Kent
F Apply the City's development codes together with the SEIS and mitigation
framework described in Section 3 of this Ordinance to expedite and simplify
processing Planned Action developments, consistent with RCW 43 21C 240
and WAC 197-11-158
4 Planned Action Ordinance —
Kent Station SEIS
SECTION 2. - Findinzs The City Council finds that
A The City of Kent selects Alternative 2, as set forth in the SEIS, as its preferred
alternative, and
B. The City of Kent Comprehensive Plan Environmental Impact Statement, the
City of Kent Downtown Strategic Action Plan and Integrated Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement (together "DSAP"), and the SEIS adequately
address all significant environmental impacts associated with the Planned
Action described in the SEIS for Alternative 2; and
C. The mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Document, Exhibit A of
this Ordinance, together with the City's development standards and any future
mitigation measures that may be imposed through the land use process, are
adequate to mitigate the significant adverse environmental impacts of the
Planned Action Projects addressed in the SEIS Additional voluntary
mitigation measures may also be incorporated in a subsequent development
agreement pursuant to RCW 36 70B 170; and
D. The SEIS Planned Actions, also referred to as "Planned Action Projects" (as
described by Alternative 2 in the SEIS), as set forth in Section 3(D) of this
Ordinance, will benefit the public, will protect the environment, and will
enhance economic development, and
E The City has provided numerous opportunities for public involvement and
review; has considered all comments received; and this public participation
process has resulted in modifications to mitigation measures and Planned
Action conceptual alternatives
5 Planned Action Ordinance —
KCent Station SEIS
F. The Planned Action describes the location, types and quantities of uses
anticipated.
G. Public services and facilities are adequate to serve the proposed Planned
Action.
SECTION 3. - Procedure and Criteria for Evaluating and Determining
Proiects as Planned Actions
A Planned Action Area. The Planned Action designation shall apply to all parcels
bound by 1" Avenue on the east between James and Smith Streets, 4`h Avenue
on the west between James and Harrison Streets, James Street on the north
between 0 and 0' Avenues, and Harrison Street on the south between 2nd and
4`h Avenues, referred to in this Ordinance as the "Planned Action site" The
property is illustrated in Exhibit B and legally described in Exhibit C
Additionally, the Planned Action designation shall apply to any off-site
improvements necessitated by the proposed Planned Action development where
the impacts of the off-site improvements have been analyzed in the SEIS.
B. Environmental Document A Planned Action designation for a site-specific
Planned Action Project permit application shall be based on the environmental
analysis contained in the draft SEIS issued by the City on April 23, 2002, and
the Final SEIS issued by the City on July 8, 2002, and those environmental
documents incorporated by reference or adopted in the SEIS. The Council's
Mitigation Document, Exhibit A, is based upon the environmental analysis in
the SEIS, and is incorporated into this Ordinance by this reference The
Mitigation Document, together with existing City codes, ordinances,
development regulations and standards and applicable county, state or federal
requirements and standards, shall provide the framework for the decision by the
City to impose conditions on a Planned Action project Other environmental
6 Planned Action Ordinance—
Kent Station SEIS
documents incorporated by reference in the SEIS may also be utilized to assist
in analyzing impacts and determining appropriate mitigation measures.
C. Planned Action Designated Land uses and activities described in the SEIS,
subject to the thresholds described in Section 3(D) and the mitigation measures
described in the Mitigation Document, Exhibit A, are designated Planned
Actions or Planned Action Projects pursuant to RCW 43.21C 031. A land use
permit application for a site-specific Planned Action Project within the Subarea
shall be designated as a Planned Action if it meets the criteria set forth in
Section 3(D) of this Ordinance and applicable laws, codes, development
regulations and standards of the City
D. Planned Action Thresholds.
1. Land Use Subject to the mitigation measures described in Exhibit A,
the following land uses and development levels, together with the
customary accessory uses and amenities described in the SEIS, are
Planned Actions pursuant to RCW 43 21C.031
a. Land Uses The following uses are the primary uses analyzed in
the SEIS.
1. Office,
II. Retail commercial;
iii. Restaurant,
IV Multifamily residential,
V. Cinema,
VI Community College;
vu Hotel & Conference Center;
vni. Surface parking,
ix Structured parking, and
x Street and infrastructure improvements.
7 Planned Action Ordinance —
Kent Station SEIS
b. Land Use Review Threshold The Planned Action designation
applies to future development proposals that are comparable to
or that are within the range established by SEIS Proposed Action
Alternative 2, as shown in the Summary of Development table
below:
Kent Station Alternative — Summary of Development in Alternative 2
Alternative 2 —
LAND USE Kent Station
Commercial (square feet)
518,400 sf
Retail
191,800
Restaurant
35,900
Grocery
47,700
Cinema (12 -Screen; 2,800 seats)
55,000
Office
138,000
Community College
50,000
Hotel/Conference Center 169,400 sf
Hotel Rooms 200 rooms
Multi -family Residential (sq feet) 434,000 sf
Housing Units 480 units
Total Commercial/Residential 1,121,800 sf
Development
Park / Open Space 53,000 sf
Civic Plaza (Alt 2)/Plaza Area (Alt 3) 23,000
Park Block (Alt 2)/Town Sq (Alt 3) 30,000
Borden Playfields 0
Parking (stalls) 2,932 stalls
8 Planned Action Ordinance —
Kent Station SEIS
A list of general uses available to the land use categories featured in the
above Summary of Development table, with appropriate development
standards, is described in Kent City Code 15 04 Surface parking includes on -
street spaces within the site, and structured parking includes `stand-alone'
parking garages as well as parking structured within and beneath mixed-use
development
If future development proposals in the Planned Action area exceed the
maximum development parameters reviewed in the SEIS, further
environmental review may be required under SEPA, as provided in WAC 197-
11-172 If proposed plans significantly change the location of uses in a manner
that would alter the environmental determinations in the SEIS, additional SEPA
review also would be required Shifting the total build -out of square footage
between uses may be permitted so long as the total build -out does not exceed
the aggregate amount of development, trip generation, and parking thresholds
reviewed under the SEIS, and so long as the impacts of that development have
been identified and mitigated in the SEIS and the Mitigation Document
2 Building Heights and Thresholds. The Planned Action Area is entirely
located within the Downtown Commercial Enterprise (DCE) zoning
district Under Kent City Code 15 04 190, there is no height limitation
in the DCE zoning district. However, proposed building height is
subject to Kent City Code 15 09 046 Downtown Design Review The
building heights reviewed in the SEIS range from one story to six
stones hi comparison with the building heights reviewed in the SEIS, a
proposed increase in height greater than one (1) additional story may
require additional SEPA review to address aesthetic impacts
3 Building Setbacks' Building setbacks shall be established by existing
development regulations and Downtown and Multifamily Design
Review
9 Planned Action Ordinance —
Kent Station SEIS
4 Open Space. Open space shall be established by existing development
regulations and Downtown and Multifamily Design Review. In no case
shall the Civic Plaza and Park Block total less than 53,000 square feet,
as analyzed in the SEIS Of this total, approximately 30,000 square feet
will be developed by the City as a Park Block
5. Transportation.
a Trip Ranges: The range of trips reviewed in the SEIS are as
follows
Trip Generation
Net New Trips Reviewed in SEIS
Time Period Total Inbound Outbound
Weekday Daily 13,200 6,600 6,600
Total
Weekday PM Peak 1,380 675 705
Hour
b Trip Threshold Uses or activities that would exceed the
maximum trip levels shown above will require additional SEPA
review
C. Public Works Discretion The Public Works Director shall have
discretion to determine incremental and total trip generation,
consistent with the ITE Trip Generation Manual (latest ed), for
each Planned Action Project permit application proposed under
this Planned Action
d Off -Site Mitigation- As provided in the SEIS in order to mitigate
transportation related impacts, an Environmental Mitigation Fee
shall be paid to participate in and pay a proportionate share of
the construction cost to fund the South 27fdlSouth 277`" Street
Corridor, which supports an alternative vehicular route that does
not require passing through Downtown Kent
10 Planned Action Ordinance —
Kent Station SEIS
e. Road Improvements The Planned Action would require off-site
road improvements as follows -
Phase I ( 0 to 690 net new PM peak hour trips )
Subject to the Public Work's Director's discretion
provided for in subsection 5(c) above, Phase I mitigation will be
triggered by the first application and will apply to all
developments until the point those developments generate up to
a total of 690 net new PM peak hour trips For any of these
proposals, all of the traffic improvements listed below must be
constructed before the City will issue any Certificates of
Occupancy At the discretion of the Public Works Director, the
City may accept a fee in lieu of constructing these
improvements Any fee shall be for the full cost to the City for
the construction of the improvements
• 4`h Avenue NIS 228`h Street. Construct a right -tum lane
on eastbound S 228`h Street to southbound 4th Avenue N.
Combined with protected phasing for this new right -tum
lane, operations could be improved from LOS F to LOS
D during the PM peak hour.
• Central Avenue S/W Willis Street: Construct a new
right -tum lane on southbound Central Avenue S to
westbound W Willis Street The new right -turn lane
would operate protected with east and westbound left -
tum movements to establish a LOS D.
• 2"" Avenue S/W Willis Street: This unsignalized
intersection is anticipated to operate at LOS F on the
minor approaches of 2nd Avenue S in 2010 with either
the Proposed Action or No Action alternatives. Restrict
11 Planned Action Ordinance —
Kent Station SEIS
left -turn movements from W Willis Street onto 2"a
Avenue S.
Phase II ( 690 to 1,460 net new PM peak hour trips)
Subject to the Public Works Director's discretion
provided for in subsection 5(c) above, Phase U mitigation will be
triggered by any development that raises the total trip generation
above 690 net new PM peak hour trips. For any of these
developments, all of the traffic improvements listed below must
be constructed before the City will issue any Certificates of
Occupancy At the discretion of the Public Works Director, the
City may accept a fee in lieu of constructing these
improvements Any fee shall be for the full cost to the City for
the construction of the improvements.
• 4th Avenue S/W Willis Street. Widen to create a second
left -tum lane on eastbound W Willis Street to
northbound 4h Avenue S and extend the right -turn lane
on southbound 4th Avenue S to westbound W Willis
Street. The intersection would operate at LOS D during
the PM peak hour with these improvements.
• 4th Avenue NIW Harrison Street- Create channelized
right -turn lanes on the eastbound and westbound
approaches of Harrison Street. Operations would
improve for right-turmng vehicles, by allowing right -
turning vehicles to bypass vehicles that are waiting in the
through/left-turn lane and enter the 4'h Avenue N traffic
stream more quickly.
12 Planned Action Ordinance —
Kent Station SEIS
These road improvements have been analyzed in the SEIS.
Significant changes to the road improvement plan proposed as part of
any Planned Action Project that have the potential to significantly
increase impacts to air quality, water quality, fisheries resources, noise
levels or other factors beyond the levels analyzed in the SEIS may
require additional SEPA review
6 Earth: A significant change from the base of information and
significant impacts contained in the SEIS under Prior Planning and
Environmental Review and from the soil and groundwater
contamination identified under Earth/Environmental Health in Chapter
III of the SEIS that have the potential to adversely affect water quality,
fisheries resources or environmental health concerns shall require
additional SEPA review, including possible MTCA compliance
7. Air Quality: A significant change in site layout or traffic generation
from that identified and evaluated in the SEIS that could affect localized
air quality would require additional SEPA review. Construction related
mitigation measures to reduce air quality impacts, as outlined in the
SEIS, shall be incorporated into the construction plans where
appropriate.
8 Water. A significant change from the base of information and
significant impact analysis contained in the SEIS under Prior Planning
and Environmental Review, and from the wetlands that were analyzed
under Wetlands in Chapter III of the SEIS that have the potential to
adversely affect water quality or fisheries resources in a material
manner not identified in the SEIS will require additional SEPA review
The City will rely on adopted local, state, and federal regulations to
mitigate the significant impacts to water quality and quantity from the
Planned Actions
13 Planned Action Ordinance—
Kent Station SEIS
9. Public Services and Utilities A significant change from the base of
information and significant impact analysis contained in the SEIS under
Prior Planning and Environmental Review, and a significant increase in
the number of square feet or dwelling units beyond the maximum
number reviewed in the SEIS, which has the potential to result in
significant adverse environmental impacts not previously identified in
the SEIS in the development's provision of public services and utilities
will require additional SEPA review.
E Planned Action Review Criteria.
1. The SEPA Official or designee is authorized to designate a project
application as a Planned Action pursuant to RCW 43.21C.031(2)(a), if
the project application meets all of the following conditions•
a The project meets the description of a Planned Action Project as
set forth in this Ordinance, and will implement any applicable
mitigation measures identified in this Ordinance; and
b The project is located within the Planned Action Area or is an
off-site improvement directly related to a proposed development
on the subject site; and
C. The project is consistent with the City of Kent Comprehensive
Plan and the Downtown Kent Action Plan; and
d. The project's significant adverse environmental impacts have
been adequately identified in the SEIS; and
e The project falls within the Planned Action thresholds
established in Section 3(D) of this Ordinance; and
f The SEPA Official has determined that the project's significant
impacts have been mitigated through the application of the
Mitigation Document in Exhibit A, as well as other applicable
City, county, state and federal requirements and conditions,
14 Planned Action Ordinance —
Kent Station SEIS
which together constitute sufficient mitigation for the significant
environmental impacts associated with the proposed project; and
g. The proposed project complies with all applicable local, county,
state, and federal regulations, and where appropriate, the
proposed project complies with needed variances or
modifications or other special permits have been identified; and
h. The proposed project is not an essential public facility
F Effect of Planned Action
1 Upon designation by the SEPA Responsible Official that the
development proposal within the Planned Action Area qualifies as a
Planned Action pursuant to this Ordinance and WAC 197-11-172, the
project shall not be subject to a SEPA threshold determination, an
environmental impact statement (EIS), or any additional review under
SEPA
2. Being designated a Planned Action or Planned Action Project means
that a proposed project has been reviewed in accordance with this
Ordinance, and found to be consistent with the development parameters
and environmental analysis included in the SEIS, including its
incorporated and adopted documents
3 Planned Action Projects will not be subject to further procedural review
under SEPA However, these projects will be subject to conditions as
outlined in this document and the attached Exhibit A, which are
designed to mitigate any environmental impacts resulting from the
project proposal. Additionally, projects will be subject to applicable
City, state and federal regulatory requirements The Planned Action
designation shall not excuse a project from meeting the City's code and
ordinance requirements apart from the SEPA process
15 Planned Action Ordinance —
Kent Station SEIS
G Planned Action Permit Process. The Planning Manager or designee shall
review projects and determine whether they meet the criteria as Planned
Actions under applicable state, federal, and local laws, regulations, codes and
ordinances The review procedure shall consist, at a minimum, of the
following -
1 Development applications will meet the requirements of Kent City Code
("KCC") Titles 6, 7, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 Applications shall be made
on forms provided by the City and shall include a SEPA checklist or
revised SEPA checklist or such other environmental review forms
provided by the Community Development, Fire, and Public Works
Departments The checklist may be incorporated into the form of an
application.
2 The Planning Manager will determine whether the application is
complete as provided in KCC Chapter 12 01
3 If the project application is within the Planned Action Area, the
application shall be reviewed to determine whether the proposed
application is consistent with and meets all of the qualifications
specified in Section 3 of this Ordinance.
4. After the City receives and reviews a complete application, the SEPA
Official shall determine, utilizing the criteria and procedures contained
in WAC 197-11-172, whether the project qualifies as a Planned Action
If the project does qualify as a Planned Action, the Planning Manager
shall notify the applicant, and the project shall proceed in accordance
with the appropriate permit procedure, except that no additional SEPA
review, threshold determination, or EIS will be required.
5 Public notice for projects that qualify as Planned Actions shall be tied to
the underlying permit and not to SEPA notice requirements If notice is
otherwise required for the underlying permit, the notice shall state that
16 Planned Action Ordinance—
Kent Station SEIS
the project has qualified as a Planned Action. If notice is not otherwise
required for the underlying permit, no special notice is required.
6. If a project is determined not to be a Planned Action, the Planning
Manager shall notify the applicant and prescribe a SEPA review
procedure consistent with the City SEPA procedures and state laws.
The notice to the applicant shall describe the elements of the application
that result in disqualification as a Planned Action.
7 Projects disqualified as a Planned Action may use or incorporate
relevant elements of the environmental review analysis in the SEIS
prepared for the Planned Action, as well as other environmental
documents to assist in meeting SEPA requirements The SEPA Official
may choose to limit the scope of the SEPA review to those issues and
environmental impacts not previously addressed in the SEIS.
SECTION 4. - Time Period. This Planned Action Ordinance shall be
reviewed no later than December 1, 2010 by the Planning Manager to determine its
continuing validity with respect to the environmental conditions of the Planned Action
Area and the vicinity and adequacy of Planned Action requirements and mitigation.
Based upon this review, this Ordinance may be amended as needed, and another
review period may be specified.
SECTION 5. - Conthe In the event of a conflict between the
Ordinance or any mitigation measures imposed pursuant thereto and any ordinance or
regulation of the City, the provisions of this Ordinance shall control EXCEPT that
provision of any Uniform Code shall supersede
SECTION 6. - Severabtkty Should any section, subsection, paragraph,
sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or its application be declared
unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of
17 Planned Action Ordinance —
Kent Station SEIS
the remaining portions of this Ordinance or its application to any other person or
situation.
SECTION 7. - Aird Party L:abdi . This Ordinance does not create or
otherwise establish or designate any particular class or group of persons who will or
should be especially protected or benefited by the terms of these regulations. No
provision or term used in these regulations is intended to impose any duty whatsoever
upon the City or any of its officers, employees, or agents
Notwithstanding any language used in this Ordinance, it is not the intent
of this Ordinance to create a duty and/or cause of action running to any individual or
identifiable person, but rather any duty is intended to run only to the general public
SECTION 8. - Effective Date This Ordinance shall be effective upon
its passage, approval, and five (5) days from and after its passage, approval and
publication as provided by law.
ATTEST:
18 Planned Action Ordinance—
Kent Station SEIS
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
�'�t r,-2� � LA,,,
TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY
PASSED- 16 day of
APPROVED 16 day of
PUBLISHED. cZV day of
2002.
2002
2001
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No
36 0 ,
passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the
Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated.
4 SEAL)
BRENDA JACOBE ITY CLERK
�3I/A 'to
.31t•b"�dtiCC
• 1
19 Planned Action Ordinance—
Kent Station SEIS
Exhibit A
DRAFT Mitigation Document DRAFT
Kent Station Planned Action
INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires environmental review for project
and non -project proposals that may have significant impacts upon the environment
In order to meet SEPA requirements, the SEPA Official for the City of Kent issued a
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Kent Station Planned Action
on April 23, 2002, and a Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement on July 8,
2002 (collectively, the "SEIS'). The SEIS has identified significant impacts that would
occur with the future redevelopment of the subject site together with a number of possible
measures to mitigate those significant impacts
The purpose of this Mitigation Document is to establish specific mitigation measures,
based upon significant impacts identified in the SEIS The mitigation measures would
apply to future development proposals that are deemed, pursuant to the City's Planned
Action Ordinance and WAC 197-11-172, to constitute Planned Actions or Planned
Action Projects that are comparable to the Proposed Action reviewed in the SEIS, and
that are located on the approximately 25 acre subject site (see Exhibit B) The mitigation
measures may also apply to off-site improvements, if they were analyzed in the SEIS
Pursuant to RCW 43 21C 240 and WAC 197-11-150, this mitigation is in addition to the
mitigation required by other applicable City, county, state and federal regulations and
requirements.
USE OF TERMS
As several similar terms are utilized in this Mitigation Document, the following phrases
or words are defined briefly
SEPA Terms
"Action" means projects or programs financed, licensed, regulated, conducted or
approved by an Agency "Project actions" involve decisions on a specific project such as
a construction or management activity for a defined geographic area "Non project"
actions involve decisions about policies, plans or programs. (See WAC 197-11-704)
"Planned Action" refers to types of project actions that are designated by ordinance for a
specific geographical area and addressed in an EIS, in conjunction with a comprehensive
plan or subarea plan, a fully contained community, a master planned resort, a master
planned development or phased project (See WAC 197-11-164).
Exhibit A — Mitigation Document
Kent Station Planned Action
Page 2
"ProposaP' means a proposed action, which may be actions and regulatory decisions of
an agency, or any actions proposed by applicants. (See 197-11-784)
Other Terms
The subject site or Planned Action Area may be referenced as "Kent Station," "site,"
"subject site" or "Planned Action Area" in this document Mitigation measures may also
apply to off-site improvements analyzed in the SEIS
This document includes mitigation measures that are tied to the approval of site plans,
construction plans, civil plans, plats, planned unit developments, and design review
Regulations are found in Kent City Code Titles 6, 7, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
General hiteipretation
Where a mitigation measure includes the words "shall" or `will" the requirement is
mandatory Where "should" or "would" appear the words convey the City's expectation
and desires given circumstances presently known, with recognition that pertinent
alternate or equivalent requirements may be imposed as more detailed design or reports
are conducted consistent with the mitigation measures.
Unless stated specifically otherwise, the mitigation measure requirements to prepare
plans, conduct studies, construct improvements, conduct maintenance activities, etc, are
the responsibility of the future developer(s) to fund and/or carry out
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED UNDER PLANNED ACTION
Proposed Action
The Proposed Action reviewed in the SEIS includes.
• Approval of a plan to redevelop the Planned Action Area within Kent's
Downtown as a mixed-use urban village
• Adoption of an ordinance designating the Kent Station Site as a Planned
Action for purposes of SEPA compliance (per RCW 43.21C.031(2)(a), and
WAC 197-11-164 and 197-11-168).
The City of Kent Downtown Strategic Action Plan identified the Subject Site ( "Site") as
a key redevelopment opportunity and recommended preparing a master plan The
Planned Action designation reflects a decision that adequate environmental review has
been completed and that further environmental review, under SEPA, for each specific
development phase would not be necessary if it is determined that any given Planned
Action Project is consistent with the development levels specified in the Planned Action
Ordinance and evaluated in the SEIS and/or applicable development regulations
Exhibit A — Mitigation Document
Kent Station Planned Action
Page 3
The Planned Action includes a combination of retail, commercial,
educational/institutional, residential and mixed-use redevelopment projects through the
year 2010 It also includes the City's approval of Planned Unit Development
(PUD)/master plan, administrative design review, wetland mitigation plan, subdivision,
civil construction drawings, and building permits. A program of road, infrastructure, and
streetscape improvements are integral to the redevelopment proposal. The City and the
Kent Station developer may also execute a development agreement, pursuant to RCW
36 7013.170. The agreement would set forth the development standards, mitigation
requirements, review procedures, etc applicable to future development.
The SEIS provides conceptual information on the potential mix of uses, building density
and height, access/circulation, recreation and open space opportunities and other
development features. The intensity of site development would fall within the range of
development represented in Alternative 2 of the SEIS (Reference Chapter II of the Draft
SEIS). The proposed development thresholds consist of 518,400 square feet of
commercial, 169,400 square feet (200 rooms) of hotel/conference center, and 480 units of
housing (434,000 square feet) Also included are 2932 parking stalls and 53,000 square
feet of park/open space.
AnplicabilM of Mitigation Document
This mitigation document applies to the Proposed Action, Alternative 2 analyzed in the
SEIS. For the mitigation document to apply to future development proposed in the
Planned Action Area, that proposed development must be comparable to or within the
range established by Alternative 2, as shown below
Kent Station Alternative 2 — Summary of Development
LAND USE
Alternative 2 — Kent c
Commercial (square feet)
518,400 sf
Retail
191,800
Restaurant
35,900
Grocery
47,700
Cinema (12 -Screen, 2,800 seats)
55,000
Office
138,000
Community College
50,000
Hotel/Conference Center
169,400 sf
Hotel Rooms
200 rooms
Subtotal
Multi -family Residential (square feet)
434,000 sf
Housing Units
480 units
Total Commercial/Residential Development
1,121,800 sf
Park / Open Space
53,000 sf
Civic Plaza (Alt 2) / Plaza Area (Alt 3)
23,000
Park Block (Alt 2) / Town Square (Alt 3)
30,000
Borden Playfrelds
0
Parking (stalls) 2,932 stalls
Exhibit A — Mitigation Document
Kent Station Planned Action
Page 4
Building heights range from one to six stones (Reference Chapter II, Tables 4 and 5 in
the SEIS).
All of the alternatives would provide the same public street improvements to lsi, 2"d and
41h Avenues N Two new public streets would also traverse the site- 1) Temperance
Street between I" and 2"d Avenues N., and 2) 2"d Avenue N. would be extended from
Smith Street to 0 Avenue N (Reference Chapter II -14 — II -16 of the SEIS).
If future proposed plans exceed the maximum development parameters reviewed,
supplemental environmental review may be required pursuant to WAC 197-11-172 and
other applicable SEPA Rules
lal I I ley.V I [oleo 1Z1Z41[URYO1►f111
Based upon the SEIS, wluch is incorporated by this reference, this Mitigation Document
identifies significant adverse environmental impacts that are anticipated to occur in
conjunction with the development of the Proposed Action Mitigation measures are
hereby established under SEPA Rules to address specific impacts identified in the SEIS,
based upon the Proposed Action.
Additional consistency review under the Planned Action, site plan review, and other
permit approvals will be required for specific development actions under the Proposed
Action pursuant to WAC 197-11-172. Additional project conditions may be imposed on
what are deemed to be Planned Action Projects based upon the analysis of the proposal in
relationship to independent requirements of city, state or federal requirements or review
criteria.
Any applicant for a project within the Planned Action Area may request modifications to
these mitigation measures, if appropriate and as a result of changed circumstances, in
order to allow an equivalent substitute mitigation or removal of a mitigation requirement
Such modifications would be evaluated by the City SEPA Responsible Official prior to
any approvals by the City, based upon SEPA Rules
As permitted under SEPA Rules (WAC 197-11-660), it is recognized that there may be
some adverse impacts that are unavoidable because reasonable or feasible mitigation
cannot be achieved for the Proposed Action.
Provided below for each element of the environment analyzed in the SEIS for the
Proposed Action are (a) summary of and/or reference to SEIS analysis of significant
environmental impacts (direct, indirect and cumulative); (b) summary of significant
unavoidable adverse impacts, (c) mitigation measures established by this Mitigation
Document, and (d) a list of federal and state laws and local policies/regulations on which
mitigation measures are based
Exhibit A — Mitigation Document
Kent Station Planned Action
Page 5
In combination, regulations applicable to each element of the environment and mitigation
measures imposed by this document will apply to and govem any Planned Action Project
and will adequately mitigate all significant environmental impacts caused by the
Proposed Action, except for those impacts that are identified as "significant unavoidable
adverse impacts "
1. Earth/Environmental Health
A. Significant Impacts Chapter III of the SEIS addresses remediation of on-site soil
and groundwater contamination Other potential environmental impacts to earth
resources and environmental health (i e., noise) have been adequately addressed
in previous environmental documents and are summarized in Chapter B of the
SETS. A summary of impacts is provided below based upon the SEIS Summary
Matrix.
• Exposure to contaminated soils and groundwater on the site could pose
potential health risks to the public Health risks are the basis of the applicable
cleanup levels that are being implemented through a cleanup plan
B Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Provided that reasonable mitigation
measures are properly followed, no significant unavoidable impacts are
anticipated.
C. Mitigation Measures The mitigation measures established below address impacts
identified in Chapter III of the SEIS.
• No mitigation measures beyond those already identified and being
implemented in connection with cleanup of the Borden Chemical Facility,
BNSF, Reiman Trust, Brutsche, Silvestri and adjacent sites are required.
Cleanup activities would be coordinated with redevelopment of the site and
associated construction activities
• Any required Clean up actions will occur as part of, and concurrent with, site
preparation and construction activities for the 2nd Avenue extension and other
proposed on-site development Consistent with the recommended monitoring
program, any monitoring wells displaced by redevelopment shall be relocated.
• Monitoring shall occur as recommended in the Phase II site assessment
reports
• Earthwork should be accomplished during the dry season from May to
September whenever possible, when soils are likely to be compacted and
when erosion and sedimentation activity are at a seasonal low.
• Erosion control methods in the short term can include channeling surface
water runoff, erosion preventing slope cover (e.g straw), channel liners, and
sedimentation control ponds Long term methods include minimizing the
concentration of runoff onto fill, cut or natural slopes, and minimizing
disturbances to natural drainage courses and existing vegetation
Exhibit A — Mitigation Document
Kent Station Planned Action
Page 6
2. Air Quality
A. Significant Impacts Chapter II of the SEIS includes an examination of
significant impacts to air quality in terns of construction activities, generated
traffic, and indirect air emissions. In general, reduced emissions of particulates,
carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides would be associated with concentrating
growth in a mixed-use pattern at higher densities in pedestrian-onented areas.
Localized dust and exhaust emissions would be generated from construction
activities.
An Air Quality Conformity Analysis was conducted in conjunction with the
FSEIS. No significant impacts were identified and no mitigation measures
related to conformity are required
B. Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts: Provided that reasonable mitigation
measures are properly followed, no significant unavoidable impacts are
anticipated.
C Mitigation Measures- The following construction related mitigation measures to
reduce air quality impacts shall be incorporated into the construction plans where
appropriate
Use only equipment and trucks that are maintained in optimal operational
condition
• Require all off road equipment to be retrofitted with emission reduction
equipment (i e , require participation in Puget Sound region Diesel Solutions
by project sponsors and contractors)
• Use bio diesel or other lower -emission fuels for vehicles and equipment
• Use carpooling or other trip reduction strategies for construction workers
• Stage construction to minimize overall transportation system congestion and
delays to reduce regional emissions of pollutants during construction
• Implement construction curbs on hot days when region is at risk for exceeding
the ozone NAAQS, and work at night instead
• Implement restrictions on construction truck idling (e.g., limit idling to a
maximum of 5 minutes)
• Locate construction equipment away from sensitive receptors such as fresh air
intakes to buildings, air conditioners, and sensitive populations
• Locate construction staging zones where diesel emissions won't be noticeable
to the public or near sensitive populations such as the elderly and the young
• Spray exposed soil with water or other suppressant to reduce emissions of
PMI 0 and deposition of particulate matter
• Pave or use gravel on staging areas and roads that would be exposed for long
periods
• Cover all trucks transporting materials, wetting materials in trucks, or
providing adequate freeboard (space from the top of the material to the top of
the truck bed), to reduce PM10 emissions and deposition during transport
Exhibit A — Mitigation Document
Kent Station Planned Action
Page 7
• Provide wheel washers to remove particulate matter that would otherwise be
carred off-site by vehicles to decrease deposition of particulate matter on area
roadways
• Remove particulate matter deposited on paved, public roads, sidewalks, and
bicycle and pedestnan paths to reduce mud and dust; sweep and wash streets
continuously to reduce emissions
• Cover dirt, gravel, and debris piles as needed to reduce dust and wind-blown
debris
• Route and schedule construction trucks to reduce delays to traffic during peak
travel times to reduce air quality impacts caused by a reduction in traffic
speeds
3. Noise
A. Significant Impacts. Increased noise and vibration would be associated with
construction These impacts could be intensive in some locations for limited
periods of time Some construction equipment and methods (e g., pile driving)
can produce peak noise levels greater than 100dBA, as well as significant
vibration
B Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Provided that reasonable mitigation
measures are properly followed, no significant unavoidable impacts are
anticipated.
C Mitigation Measures
• Mitigation measures for construction impacts may include enforcement of
limits of the hours of construction activity, proper maintenance of equipment,
use of mufflers and/or temporary sound barriers, alternative construction
techniques (e g , pile auguring), contractor preparation of noise control plans,
and active monitoring and enforcement of applicable standards.
4. Wetlands
A. Significant Impacts Chapter III of the SEIS includes an examination of
significant impacts to wetlands. A summary of impacts is provided below based
upon the SEIS Summary Matrix. For a more detailed discussion of impacts, see
Chapter III of the SEIS.
• Three on-site wetlands would be filled to permit construction of planned
buildings, roads and infrastructure
B Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts The wetland functions, values and
area would be lost, and are unavoidable in the context of the alternative site plans
and the City's goals for Downtown development.
Exhibit A — Mitigation Document
Kent Station Planned Action
Page S
C Mitigation Measures.
• Mitigation, in the form of off-site compensation, would occur consistent with
the City's adopted wetland standards and regulations and shall include the
preparation of a wetland mitigation plan.
5. Land Use
A. Significant Impacts Chapter III of the SEIS includes an examination of
significant impacts to land use A summary of impacts is provided below based
upon the SEIS Summary Matrix For a more detailed discussion of impacts, see
Chapter III of the SEIS
• Proposed development would be of higher density and intensity than the No
Action alternative and therefore involve potentially greater impacts
However, proposed development would be comparable to the density and
intensity permitted under current zoning
• A mix of uses would occur.
• The character of the site would change significantly from low-density, auto -
oriented, suburban area with small buildings surrounded by large parking lots,
to an urbanized, pedestnan-onented/transit-onented district.
• Borden Playfields would be replaced by urban park space resulting in a net
reduction of between 3 5 and 3 8 acres of park land in the City Demand
could increase at other park facilities
• Increased light, noise, and activity associated with an urban area may be
noticeable from residential area to the north
• Proposal would encourage new economic, civic and pedestrian activity in the
area that indirectly could result in increased development pressure on
surrounding properties to intensify.
• Some existing uses may be displaced and could relocate within the site or
nearby commercial districts. As redevelopment occurs, potential land use
conflicts between adjacent low intensity uses and new development could
result
B. Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts- Some displacement of existing land
uses on the Kent Station Planned Action site would occur Some limited contrast
in land use intensity, bulk and scale would occur, primarily where larger buildings
are proposed adjacent to existing single family residences. Impacts relatmg to
lighting and noise may be mitigated but cannot be entirely avoided, they are
considered to be an inherent characteristic of a mixed-use urban neighborhood
C Mitigation Measures Kent's adopted Comprehensive Plan, zoning regulations
and Downtown Design Guidelines provide policies, processes, standards and
development regulations that would mitigate most identified impacts
• Utilize careful site planning, building design and buffering Utilize techniques
such as lighting limits, full cut-off fixtures, ample landscaping to buffer
Exhibit A — Mitigation Document
Kent Station Planned Action
Page 9
adjacent uses and ensure privacy, placement/onentation of some building
elements (e g., deliveries, solid waste receptacles) to help control noise.
• Locate taller buildings in the interior of the site, set back upper stories of taller
buildings from the street, or utilize additional screening or other design
techniques to reduce the impact to existing single family neighborhoods.
• To minimize potential business and employment displacement impacts that
would occur on-site, the City should provide technical assistance in relocation
to other suitable sites.
• In mixed-use areas, the potential intrusion of noise from commercial, office
and retail areas into residential areas should be minimized by limiting noisy
activities (e.g. trash collection or composting) to hours outside of 11 pm to 7
am
6. Relationship to Plans, Policies and Regulations
A Significant Impacts. Chapter III of the SEIS reviews the consistency of the Kent
Station Planned Action alternatives to selected federal, state, regional and local
plans, policies and/or regulations.
• The proposal is consistent with GMA planning goals to guide growth into an
area with existing and planned infrastructure. The proposal also is consistent
with the City of Kent's land use designations, transportation, economic
development, and community design policies and goal of redeveloping
Downtown from a low -intensity suburban character to a higher intensity urban
character.
B Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts None are anticipated
C Mitigation Measures No specific mitigation measures are warranted beyond the
application of City regulations, which in many cases contain mitigation features
Future development or redevelopment within the Downtown is subject to existing
federal and regional storm water management plan requirements, local
development regulations, local concurrency regulations, and design standards.
7. Aesthetics
A Significant Impacts Chapter III of the SEIS includes examination of significant
impacts to visual character, including intensity, bulk/scale/height, visual
compatibility, streetscape continuity, and light and glare generated. A summary
of impacts is provided below based upon the SEIS Summary Matrix.
• The proposal is likely to improve visual quality overall. Proposed
development would support the Historic District by improving streetscapes,
pedestrian connections, and urban parks, resulting in a more unified
Downtown core area
• The proposal would provide mixed-use development in buildings ranging
from one to six stones in height and lot coverage of up to 95 percent Most
buildings would contain ground floor retail uses to encourage a lively
Exlubtt A — Mitigation Document
Kent Station Planned Action
Page 10
pedestrian oriented environment. On -street, surface and structured parking
would be provided
• Some negative impacts could result from differences in bulk and scale along
the northern edges of the site, where more intensive development would be
near single family residential uses The proposed development also would be
larger in bulk and scale than the structures in the adjacent Historic Core
District
• Light, glare and shadowing likely will increase
B Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts: The expected significant visual and
aesthetic change is generally considered to be positive and are consistent with the
City of Kent Comprehensive Plan. Mitigation measures below, together with the
City's adopted development regulations and design standards are adequate to
mitigate the anticipated significant adverse impacts
C Mitigation Measures
• Utilize careful site planning, building design and buffering. Utilize techniques
such as lighting limits, full cut-off fixtures, low hanging street lamps, and
ample landscaping to buffer adjacent uses and ensure privacy
• Locate taller buildings in the interior of the site, set back upper stones of taller
buildings from the street, or utilize additional screening or other design
alternatives to reduce the impact to existing single family neighborhoods.
• Prohibit reflective building materials
8. Transportation
A Significant Impacts Chapter III and Appendix C of the SEIS examines
significant impacts to parking and the transportation system A summary of
impacts is provided below based upon the SEIS Summary Matrix.
• Trip Generation New Weekday trip generation ranges from a total of 13,200
daily and 1,380 PM peak hour trips
• Levels of Service Intersection levels of service are expected to generally
remain the same as 2010 Baseline for more than half of the study area
intersections. At these intersections a slight increase in delay is expected but
increase in total intersection volume is insufficient to cause a noticeable
change in LOS. Between 14 and 16 study intersections are anticipated to
operate at or over capacity with or without the Proposed Action In
comparison to 2010 Baseline, 5 additional intersections would operate at or
over capacity with Alternative 2.
• Valley Freeway SB Ramps/W Willis Street
• Valley Freeway NB Ramps/W Willis Street
•
0 Avenue S/W Willis Street
• 4`h Avenue N/W Hamson Street
• 1" Avenue N/W James Street
• Site Access. With or without the Proposed Action, intersections around the
perimeter of the site, those providing a connection between the site and the
Exlubit A — Mitigation Document
Kent Station Planned Action
Page 11
external street system, are expected to operate at between LOS A and F.
Unsignalized access points intersecting with W James and W Smith Streets
are anticipated to operate at LOS F, while the signalized access points on
these artenals are expected to operate at LOS A and LOS B The unsignalized
access points on the more minor roads are anticipated to operate between LOS
B and C and intersections internal to the site are expected to operate at LOS B
or better.
• The Proposed Action provides 2,932 parking stalls, with 995 shared stalls in
the Sound Transit Garage and surface parking lot Proposed supply falls
within the mimmum and maximum range depending on time of day and day
of week. Anticipated demand, separate from commuter demand, also falls
within the mimmum and maximum code requirements Adopted code
requirements are sufficient to satisfy anticipated parking impacts
• With or without the Proposed Action, construction would generate some truck
and vehicle traffic associated with excavation and hauling, delivery of
materials, and similar types of activity While construction may cause
inconveniences directly adjacent to the site, the impacts would be temporary
and are not expected to extend to the surrounding study area.
• The City has identified the S 277`h Street Comdor improvements (both
constructed and portions planned for construction), as providing significant
relief on the existing east/west corridor system, including SR 516 This
corridor and associated improvements will provide a necessary commuter
alternate route from I-5 to Kent's East Hill which bypasses the Downtown
Core. Environmental Mitigation Assessments charged to the developer will
be assessed at the LID rate for the S 272"d/S 277`h Corridor and will
proportionately pay toward improvements along that corridor that are
identified on the City's 6 -Year Transportation Capital Improvement Plan
B Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Traffic will increase as a result of
forecast growth, with or without implementation of the alternatives. Congestion
will increase and levels of service will decrease at nearby intersections.
C. Mitigation Measures
• Construction Traffic. The City will provide project specifications that will
dictate the route used by construction traffic to enter and exit the construction
site, stipulate the hours of work, and stipulate maximum permitted noise
levels The contractor shall provide traffic control when construction traffic
would disrupt the normal traffic flow This traffic control will be in the form
of flaggers, variable message signs, light and other traffic control devices
The hours of work shall minimize the impact at heavy traffic times The
contractor shall maintain City roads used by construction traffic by keeping
them clean at all times The contractor shall control dust by watering the site
frequently or by other means acceptable and approved by the City.
• Transportation Management Program- The developer and the City shall
develop a Transportation Management Plan (TMP) for employment and
Exhibit A — Mitigation Document
Kent Station Planned Action
Page 12
residential components of Kent Station The TMP shall support a goal of
reducing employee and residential Single Occupant Vehicle (SOV) travel
along with the potential increase in transit and rail service over time
• Off -Site Mitigation The Kent Station developer shall pay an Environmental
Mitigation Fee to participate in and pay a proportionate share of the
construction costs to the City's South 272nd/South 277`h Street Corridor
project to support an alternative vehicular through -route that bypasses
Downtown Kent The fee shall be at a rate of $1,068 per PM Peak hour trip
(in 1986 dollars to be adjusted for inflation based upon the Consumer Price
Index, US City Average for all Urban Consumers, or the substituted index as
prepared by the US Department of Labor).
Additionally, the following improvements to the local transportation system
shall be provided for Phase I Mitigation (0 to 690 net new PM peak hour
trips)
• 4th Avenue N/S 228th Street Construct a right -turn lane on eastbound S
228th Street to southbound 4th Avenue N Combined with protected
phasing for this new right -tum lane, operations could be improved from
LOS F to LOS D during the PM peak hour
• Central Avenue S/W Willis Street: Construct a new right -turn lane on
southbound Central Avenue S to westbound W Willis Street. The new
nght-tum lane would operate protected with east and westbound left -tum
movements to establish a LOS D.
• 2°d Avenue S/W Willis Street: This unsignalized intersection is
anticipated to operate at LOS F on the minor approaches of 2nd Avenue S
in 2010 with either the Proposed Action or No Action alternatives
Restrict left -tum movements from W Willis Street onto 2nd Avenue S.
The following improvements to the local transportation system shall be
provided for Phase 11 Mitigation ( 690 to 1,460 net new PM peak hour trips):
• 4`h Avenue S/W Willis Street Widen to create a second left -turn lane on
eastbound W Willis Street to northbound 4d' Avenue S and extend the
right -tum lane on southbound 4d' Avenue S to westbound W Willis Street
The intersection would operate at LOS D during the PM peak hour with
these improvements
• 4th Avenue N/W Harrison Street Create channelized right -tum lanes on
the eastbound and westbound approaches of Harrison Street Operations
would improve for nght-turning vehicles, by allowing right -turning
vehicles to bypass vehicles that are waiting in the through/left-turn lane
and enter the 4d' Avenue N traffic stream more quickly
Exlubit A — Mitigation Document
Kent Station Planned Action
Page 13
9. Nexus
It is appropriate, as per WAC 197-11-660 and RCW 43 21C.060 that the City of
Kent establish conditions to mitigate any identified impacts associated with this
proposal, consistent with the City's substantive SEPA authority, Kent City Code
section 1103 510
EXHIBIT "B"
EXHIBIT C
Legal Description
Those portions of the Southeast quarter of Section 13, Township 22, Range 4 East, W.M.,
and of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter in Section 24, Township 22, Range
4 East, W.M., including platted properties therein lying South of the North right-of-way
margin of James Street, lying West of the East riht-of-way margin of I" Avenue North,
lying East of the West right-of-way margin of 4` Avenue North, and lying North of the
South right-of-way margin of West Harrison Street; together with that portion lying East
of the West right-of-way margin of 2"d Avenue North and lying North of the South right-
of-way margin of West Harrison Street.
Situate in King County, State of Washington, W.M.
Ylinl'ae�.s PenJNuwRnWNH�pIFX[6i
Return Address:
Attn: City Clerk
City of Kent
220 Fourth Ave. S.
Kent. WA 98032
***s**ss*wrwww**wrwss*s***ss*w*s*******s*sa*s*ssssssssssssss*s**s*ssw*sswwsw***ssss*ssss*s
WASHINGTON STATE COUNTY AUDITOR/RECORDER'S COVER SHEET
Document Title: City of Kent Ordinance No. 3608 establishing a Planned Action for a
site approximately 25.0 acres in size, as described in the adopted Kent
Station Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement.
Reference Number: N/A
Grantor(s): City of Kent
Grantee(s): The Public / Ordinance No. 3608
Abbreviated Legal Description: SE %,, Section 13, Township 22, Range 4E; NE % of NE
%, Section 24, Township 22, Range 4E
Additional legal description is on Page 34 (Exhibit C) of document.
Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number(s):
7142800021, 71428000259 71428000659 71428001909
71428001659 71428001709 71428001719 71428001809
24220490109 24220491269 24220491271, 24220491449
9825700495, 98257005051, 98257005109 98257005159
98257055559
7142800000, 7142800005,
7142800135, 7142800160,
71428001859 71428055559
24220455559 98257004459
9825700520, 9825700535,