HomeMy WebLinkAbout3544Ordinance No. 3544
["Beginning July 1, 1998"]
(Amending or Repealing Ordinances)
AMENDS Ord. 3222
ORDINANCE NO. 3 5 yy/
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, amending the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan as
follows: (1) to change the plan's land use map designation from
Low Density Multifamily (LDMF) to Commercial (C) for property
located at 12819 Kent-Kangley Road (CPA -2000-2(B)); (2) to
change the plan's land use map designation from Industrial and
Single -Family Residential, 6 units per acre (SF -6) to Low Density
Multifamily (LDMF) for property located at South 222"d Street and
88th Avenue South (CPA -2000-2(C)); (3) to amend the Capital
Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to include the Capital
Facilities Plans of the Kent and Federal Way School Districts (CPA -
2000 -2(F); and (4) to amend the Capital Facilities Element of the
Comprehensive Plan to reflect a 6 -year plan for capital facilities
projects (CPA -2000-2(G)).
WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act ("GMA")
requires internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements and the plans from
other jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, to assure that comprehensive plans remain relevant and up
to date, the GMA requires each jurisdiction to establish procedures whereby
amendments to the plan are considered by the City Council (RCW 36.70A.130(2)), and
limits these amendments to once each year unless an emergency exists; and
WHEREAS, the City of Kent has established a procedure for amending
the Comprehensive Plan in Chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code, which sets a deadline
of September 1st of each year for submittal of requests for comprehensive plan
amendments; and
2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
WHEREAS, by September 1, 2000, the City received applications to
amend the comprehensive plan's land use plan map designation, and three of those
applications involve parcels located at: (1) 21800 Frager Road and 22002 Riverview
Boulevard (CPA -2000-2(A)); (2) 12819 Kent-Kangley Road (CPA -2000-2(B)); and
(3) South 222nd Street and 88th Avenue South (CPA -2000-2(C)); and
WHEREAS, the parcel at 21800 Frager Road and 22002 Riverview
Boulevard is currently designated Agricultural (A) and Single -Family Residential, 3
units per acre (SF -3), and the applicants are requesting a plan designation of Single
Family Residential, 6 units per acre (SF -6) (CPA -2000-2(A)); and
WHEREAS, the parcel at 12819 Kent-Kangley Road is currently
designated Low Density Multifamily (LDMF), and the applicants are requesting a plan
designation of Commercial (C) (CPA -2000-2(B)); and
WHEREAS, the parcel at South 222nd Street and 881h Avenue South is
currently designated Industrial and Single -Family Residential, 6 units per acre (SF -6),
and the applicants are requesting a plan designation of Low Density Multifamily
(LDMF) (CPA -2000-2(C)); and
WHEREAS, the Kent and Federal Way School Districts are requesting
amendments to the text of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to
reflect proposed changes to impact fees resulting from new student population generated
by new single-family and multifamily residential development; and
WHEREAS, the City of Kent Finance Department has submitted
proposed amendments to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to
identify a 6 -year plan for capital facilities projects, including costs and revenue sources;
and
2 2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
WHEREAS, the City of Kent Land Use and Planning Board considered
the requested comprehensive plan amendments, conducted a public hearing of the same
on November 27, 2000, and made the following recommendations: (1) the denial of
CPA -2000-2(A), (2) the approval of CPA —2000-2(B) and CPA -2000-2(C), and (3) no
recommendation for CPA -2000-2(F) and CPA -2000-2(G);
WHEREAS, the Planning Committee further discussed the amendments
at its February 5, 2001, meeting; and moved to recommend: (1) the tabling of the
proposed comprehensive plan designation for CPA -2000-2(A) until the Agricultural
Lands Study is complete; (2) the approval of the amendments of the comprehensive plan
designations for CPA -2000-2(B) and CPA -2000-2(C); (3) the approval of the
amendments to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan regarding the
incorporation of the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent and Federal Way School
Districts (CPA -2000-2(F)); and (4) the approval of the amendments to the Capital
Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to reflect a 6 -year plan for capital
facilities projects (CPA -2000-2(G)); and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments of CPA -2000-2(B), CPA -2000-
2(C), CPA -2000-2(F), and CPA -2000-2(G) are consistent with the standards of review
for comprehensive plan amendments outlined in Section 12.02.050 of the Kent City
Code; and
WHEREAS, on February 20, 2001, the City Council for the City of Kent
approved the recommendation to table the proposed comprehensive plan designation for
CPA -2000-2(A) until the Agricultural Lands Study is complete; and
WHEREAS, on February 20, 2001, the City Council for the City of Kent
approved the recommendation of the comprehensive plan amendment CPA -2000-2(B)
to amend the comprehensive plan designation of a parcel of property at 12819 Kent -
3 2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
IKangley Road from a plan designation of Low Density Multifamily (LDMF) to
Commercial (C); and
WHEREAS, on February 20, 2001, the City Council for the City of Kent
approved the recommendation of the comprehensive plan amendment CPA -2000-2(C)
to amend the comprehensive plan designation of parcels of property at South 222nd
Street and 88th Avenue from a plan designation of Industrial and Single -Family
Residential (SF -6) to a plan designation of Low Density Multifamily (LDMF); and
WHEREAS, on February 20, 2001, the City Council for the City of Kent
approved the recommendation of the Capital Facilities Element amendment CPA -2000-
2(F) to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent and Federal Way School
Districts; and
WHEREAS, on February 20, 2001, the City Council for the City of Kent
approved the recommendation of the Capital Facilities Element amendment CPA -2000-
2(G) to reflect a 6 -year plan for capital facilities projects; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City of Kent Comprehensive Plan adopted by
Ordinance No. 3222, as subsequently amended, is hereby amended to establish new plan
designations for the following parcels:
A. For the property located at 12819 Kent-Kangley Road, Kent, Washington, from
a plan designation of Low Density Multifamily (LDMF) to Commercial (C), as
depicted in the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by
this reference (CPA -2000-2(B)).
B. For the property located at South 222nd Street and 88th Avenue South, Kent,
Washington, from a plan designation of Industrial and Single -Family Residential
4 2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
(SF -6) with six (6) dwelling units per acre to Low Density Multifamily
Residential (LDMF), as depicted in the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and
incorporated herein by this reference (CPA -2000-2(C)).
SECTION 2. The Capital Facilities Plan element of the Kent
Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to include the Capital Facilities elements of the
Kent and Federal Way School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit `B" attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference (CPA -2000-2(F).
SECTION 3. The Capital Facilities Element of the City of Kent
Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to reflect a 6 -year plan for capital facilities
projects, as set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference (CPA -2000-2(G)).
SECTION 4. - SeverabiLU. If anyone or more sections, sub -sections,
Dr sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision
shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall
remain in full force and effect.
SECTION S. - Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be
force thirty (30) days from and after the date of passage as provided b law.
J HITE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBERVITY CLERK _
5 2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
A. LUBOVICH. CITY ATTORNEY
PASSED 6 day of '2001.
APPROVED day of , 2001.
PUBLISHED �_ day of aAx ik-, 2001.
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. 35'1�4, passed
by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the
City of Kent as hereon indicated.
\Civil\Ordinance\CompPlanAmend-2000 doc
(SEAL)
BRENDA JACO , CITY CLERK
6 2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
' ' y L v)
m O T� c o .v
G o Z
NMl y J C m N CDD
ZO �V m = 0 v y w� N r
ea
Y
N s m 'c m� ti x .�
G� Z m 3 J Y v cy
Q •• 0-
>
�
' • L';�.':.:1'. ••ice --.............
'� //
.. ........
. / r\
.. ........
_ I
a _ -------------- - — /
... • •....:: t :....::::.:::
.... ...
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . li I "
1',' 10
....•......•...•...... •. •. � / /
..........................
::.........
....
.....
....... ........ i � e
�♦
V
.N
on
C
C
d
N
L �+
to
0
L
=
v
O
d
0
N
�""O
Mtn
cc.�
> J
d
"
y
c
=
'o
O
N
C
ad
V
H(a
w
9
ad
O
0
m
m
ti
N
Wp
J N
d
E
,�
a=
�_°
c
°� �
Y c
Y
r
0
O
z
L_
._
mQ
o(4
m
@�@
G
O
vm
��
d
3
l0 d
Y
L
v
LL
Ln
_3
,�
d
=
a
City of Kent, Washington
200.1 — 2006 Preliminary
Capita/ Facilities Plan
WA 5 H I N G T O N
November 21, 2000
Fj
2001 - 2006 Capital Improvement Program
Sources of Funds
Amounts in 000's
Street Fund Revenue Bonds -
14% Drainage
A0/
Councilmanic Bond
Proceeds
20%
Public Safety Bon
21%
Alt(
S.,..,.. .,...
5%
Other Funding
Sources
2%
Utility Funds
16%
Capital Improvement
Fund
11%
Total Sources of Funds 18,753 42,938 13,269 39,678 16,779 17,013 148,430
1
cw combined CIP requests 01 xis 11/21/00
Recommend
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Total
Sources of Funds
Capital Improvement Fund
3,111
2.735
2,672
2,885
2,794
2.770
16,967
Grants
2,275
438
1,400
595
4,355
1,242
10,305
Other Funding Sources
553
950
98
735
30
2.366
Alternative Funding Sources - Parks
2.645
633
1,512
1,240
1,228
536
7,794
Public Safety Bonds
-
30,000
-
-
30,000
Councilmanic Bond Proceeds
-
2,000
21,000
-
6,273
29,273
Street Fund
4,511
2,251
3,733
4,056
3,955
2,727
21,233
Revenue Bonds - Drainage
6,279
6,279
Utility Funds
5,658
3,931
3,854
3,623
3,712
3,435
24.213
Total Sources of Funds 18,753 42,938 13,269 39,678 16,779 17,013 148,430
1
cw combined CIP requests 01 xis 11/21/00
2001 - 2006 Capital Improvement Program
Projects Forecast
Amounts in 000's
Transportation
20%
Projects
Transportation
Public Safety
Parks, Recreation
8 Community Services
General Government
Utility Fund Projects'
Total Projects
Public Safety
29%
Utility Fund
Projects
24%
& Community
Services
16%
General
wernment
11%
5
Recommend
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
4,511
2,151
3,633
7,406
8,645
3,002
29,348
490
4,550
26,550
8,550
550
3,523
44,213
6,886
3,431
4,357
3,145
2,947
2,828
23,594
1,508
3,175
1,175
4,475
1,225
4,525
16,083
5,358
3,631
3,554
14.202
5,312
3,135
35,192
18,753
16,938
39,269
37,778
18,679
17,013
148,430
Includes reallocation (from General Gov't -Facilities) of cost of Maintenance Facility funded with councilmanic bonds repaid from
Street, CIP and Utility Fund operating transfers
.2
Capital Improvement Program
for Years 2001 - 2006
Recommend
1 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
,Sources of Funds
Capital Improvement Fund
CIP Fund - REET 2nd Qtr
Youth/Teen
Grants - Parks
Donations and Contributions
Other Funding Sources
Alternative Funding Sources - Parks
Public Safety Bonds
Sewer Utility Fund
Drainage Utility Fund
Revenue Bonds - Drainage
Grants - Street
LID & Mitigation Payments
Street Fund
Councilmanic Bond Proceeds
Water Fund
Total Sources of Funds
Transportation
Corridor Improvements
Arterials
Ir•=rsection & Signal Improvements
r Improvements
Kcal Transportation
Public Safety
Fire & Life Safety Requests
Police
Public Safety Facilities
Public Safety
,Total
Parks,Recreation
& Community Services
(General Government
IGeneral Government Facilities
O:her General Government
Notal General Government
Utility Fund Projects
Sanitary Sewer
Stormwater Drainage
Water Projects
Total Utility Fund Projects
Total All Proiects
1,716
1,445
1,445
1,290
250
100
2,275
438
140
100
13
750
2,645
633
-
30,000
521
403
3,962
1,886
100
-
4,511
2,251
-
2,000
1.175
1,642
18,753 42,938
1,445
1,495
1,495
1495
9,091
1,227
1,390
1,299
1.275
7,926
65
-
-
-
415
1,400
395
300
867
5,675
3
1.500
1,376
1,383
243
30
1,452-
11,797
30
823
1,512
1,240
1,228
536
7,794
395
475
-
-
30.000
415
427
440
454
2,660
1,184
1.562
1,625
1,070
11.289
4,000
6,279
6,279
32,973
200
4,055
375
4,630
-
-
735
-
835
3,733
4,056
3,955
2,727
21,233
21,000
-6,273
29,273
2.255
1,634
1,647
1,911
10.264
13,269
39,678
16,779
17,013
148,430
500
500
2,000
2,000
1,000
1,786
6,000
1,361
-
-
500
5,965
900
8,726
1,150
275
250
250
250
650
2,825
1.500
1,376
1,383
4,656
1,430
1,452-
11,797
4,511
2,151
3,633
7,406
8,645
3,002
29,348
395
475
475
475
475
X475
2,770
95
75
75
8,075
75
75
8,470
4,000
26,000
2,973
32,973
490
4,550
26,550
8,550
550
3,523
44,213
cw combined CIP requests 01.315 1121/00
6,886 3,431 4,357 3,145 2,947 2,828 23,594
337 350 350 3,650
1,171 2,825 825 825
1,508 3,175 1,175 4,475
421
303
315
1,952
3,862
1,786
1,084
7,466
1,075
1,542
2,155
4,784
5,358
3,631
3,554
14,202
18,753
16,938
39,269
37,778
M
400
3,700
8,787
825
825
7,296
1,225
4,525
16,083
340
354
3,685
3,425
970
18,593
1,547
1,811
12,914
5,312
3,135
35,192
18,679
17,013
148,430
4
I
Transportation
Capital Improvement Program
for Years 2001 - 2006,
Recommend
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Total
Sources of Funds
Grants
200
4,055
375
4,630
LID & Mitigation Payments
100
735
835
Street Fund
4,411
2,151
3,633
3,956
3,855
2 627
20 633
Total Sources of Funds
4,511
2,151
3,633
4,156
8,645
3,002
26,098
Corridor Improvements
228th Corridor - West Corridor
500
500
2,000
2,000
1,000
6,000
Arterials
-
Onllia Road Repair
100
-
-
-
-
100
212th Street Rehab
300
300
132nd Ave Improvements (240th - 244th)
-
-
-
-
-
250
250
Washington Avenue Widening
300
-
-
-
300
72nd Avenue (180th -188th)
111
-
-
-
-
-
111
72nd Avenue (196th - 200th)
250
-
-
500
750
84th Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation
-
-
-
500
-
-
500
Pacific Hwy South HOV Lanes - Phase II
300
-
-
-
4,965
-
5,265
Military Road Improvements
-
-
-
-
-
150
150
116th Ave Imp (256th - KK(SR516))
-
-
-
-
-
500
500
Central Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation
-
-
-
-
500
-
500
Intersection & Signal Improvements
-
James & Central Intersection Improve
200
-
-
" -
-
-
200
208th & 98th Intersection Improvements
100
-
-
-
-
-
100
WVH & 277th Intersection Improvement
-
-
250
-
-
-
250
Military & Reith Intersection Improvement - A
450.
-
-
-
-
-
450
94th Ave @ Canyon Or Traffic Signal
400
-
-
-
-
-
400
1-5 & 277th Intersection Improvement
-
275
-
-
-
275
Military Rd & 277th Intersection Improve
-
-
-
-
-
650
650
116th & 248th Signal
-
-
-
-
250
-
250
120th & 248th Street Improvement
-
-
-
250
-
-
250
Other Improvements
-
Miscellaneous Asphalt Overlays
478
497
517
538
560
582
3,172
Slurry Seal Program
50
50
75
75
75
75
400
Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Installation
300
300
300
300
300
300
1,800
Street Lighting Wiring Upgrades
60
-
-
-
-
-
60
Traffic Signal Controller Cabinet Replacements
40
40
-
-
-
-
80
Neighborhood Traffic Control
75
75
75
75
75
75
450
Traffic Signal Energy Conservation
25
-
-
-
-
-
25
City Wide Guardrail & Safety Improvement
30
30
30
30
30
30
180
Bike Paths
-
100
100
100
100
100
500
Commuter Shuttle Bus
45
45
45
45
45
45
270
Street Tree Maintenance Program
141
141
141
141
141
141
846
Street Striping Program
81
83
85
87
89
89
514
Pavement Rating Survey
15
15
15
15
15
15
90
Lincoln Avenue (Smith - James)
150
-
-
-
-
-
150
Freight Mobility Study
10
-
-
-
-
-
10
Total Projects
4,511
2,151
3,633
4,156
8,645
3,002
26,098
4
I
Parks, Recreation and Community Services
Capital Improvement Program
for Years 2001 - 2006
Recommend
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Total
Sources of Funds
CIP- REET 2nd Qtr
1,445
1,290
1,227
1,390
1,299
1,275
7,926
Capital Improvement Fund
118
120
120
120
120
120
718
Grants
2,275
438
1,400
395
300
867
5,675
Youth/Teen Fund
250
100
65
-
-
-
415
Donations/Contributions
140
100
3
-
-
-
243
Other Funding Sources
13
750
30
-
-
30
823
Alternative Funding
2.645
633
1 512
1,240
1,228
536
7.794
Total Sources of Funds
6,886
3,431
4,357
3,145
2,947
2,828
23,594
Projects
Risk Reduction & Safety Improvements
243
262
233
213
213
1,164
Light Pole Replacement
20
150
150
150
150
45
665
Emergency Park Repairs
25
30
30
35
35
155
Tennis/Basketball Court Re -surfacing
40
20
35
20
15
15
145
Trails/Parking Improvements
25
30
30
30
35
150
Service Club Ballfields
1,400
800
-
-
-
2,200
Restroom Renovation
25
30
30
30
35
150
Lake meridian Park Improvements
100
210
-
-
-
-
310
Urban Forestry Plan Implementation--
15
15
20
20
25
95
Grant Matching Funds
50
105
65
-
110
25
355
Architect/Engineering & Master Plans
10
25
30
30
35
35
165
Sign Replacement
10
10
10
10
15
55
Downtown Sidewalk Replacement Enhancement
85
90
90
90
-
355
Golf Complex Projects
43
45
45
45
45
45
268
Soccer Field Renovation
800
300
-
-
-
1,100
Skate Park Development/Acquisition
400
-
-
-
-
400
Green River Disabled Fishing Access/Boeing Trs
300
-
-
-
-
-
300
Canterbury Park Development
238
-
-
-
-
238
Regional Trail System Planning
10
-
-
-
-
10
Lake Fenwick Park Development
75
-
-
-
-
75
Recreation Facility Feasibility Study
50
-
-
-
-
50
Botanical Garden
25
-
-
-
-
25
Mill Creek Trail Acquisition & Development
25
200
-
-
-
225
Big Blue Mobile Computer Lab
-
65
-
-
-
65
Spnngwood Park Improvements
40
25
-
-
-
65
132nd Street Park Development
-
750
-
-
-
750
Green River Corridor
-
25
-
-
-
25
Demolition of Rental Houses
-
25
-
-
-
25
East Hill Youth Sports Facility Development
-
600
1,100
-
-
1,700
Uplands Playfield Improvements
-
40
-
-
-
40
Seven Oaks Park Improvements
-
35
-
-
35
West Fenwick Renovations
-
-
307
-
-
307
Krwanis Tot Lot #1 Improvements
-
-
40
40
Tudor Square Renovations
-
-
30
-
-
30
Pine Tree Park Improvements
-
-
300
-
-
300
West Hill Park Development (Seattle Water)
-
-
-
777
-
777
5
cw combined CIP requests Ot-xls 11121/00
Parks, Recreation and Community Services
Capital Improvement Program
for Years 2001 - 2006
Recommend
2001 2002 2003
2004
2005
2006
Total
Clark Lake Development
- 300
30
-
-
330
228th Corridor Park/Trallhead(Russell Woods)
- -
-
25
-
25
Town Square Park
- -
-
1,000
-
1,000
Interurban Trail
- -
-
-
30
30
Riverwalk/Riverview Park Development
- -
-
12
550
562
S. 272nd St. Neighborhood Park Development
- 400
-
-
260
660
Commons Playfield Renovations
- -
-
-
1,040
1,040
Turnkey Park Renovations
63 -
-
-
-
63
Valley Floor Athletic Complex Acq. & D
770 -
-
-
-
770
Clark Lake Land Acquisition
3,095 - -
-
-
-
3,095
Grant Matching - Land Acquisition
75 100 100
100
100
100
575
BMX Property Donation
200 -
-
-
-
200
Panther Lake Neighborhood Park Acquisition
- -
350
-
-
350
East Hill Youth Sports Complex
- -
200
-
-
200
Kent Memorial Park Acquisition
- 1,000
-
-
-
1,000
Turnkey Park Acquisition 8 Parking Lot Development - -
-
250
325
575
3/4 to Pick-up
25
25
Earth Works / Mill Creek Park
14
14
Major Capital and Lifecycle Renovations
250
250
Outside Services
16
16
Total Projects
6,886 3,431 4,357
3,145
2,947
2,828
23,594
. 6
c,v combined CIP requests 01.xIs 1121/00
Sources of Funds
Councilmanic Bond Proceeds
Voted Public Safety Bonds
CIP Revenues Required
Total Sources of Funds
Projects
Emergency Facility Repairs
Miscellaneous Furniture
Sealcoat Parking Lots
HVAC Repairs and Controls Installation
Roof Repairs
Other Facility Repairs S Improvements
Campus Expansion and Renovation
New East Hill Maintenance Facility
Subtotal General Gov't Facilities
Public Safety Facilities Projects
Municipal Court Building
Police Headquarter Building
Other Public Safety Facility Improvements
Subtotal Public Safety Facilites
Total Projects
General Government Facilities
100
100
100
Capital Improvement Program
100
600
82
for Years 2001 - 2006
25
25
25
25
207
40
50
Recommend
50
50
50
2001 2002 2003
2004 2005
2006
Total
40
75
13,000
6,273
19.273
30,000
75
30.000
337 350 350
400 400
400
2.237
337 30,350 350
13,400 400
6,673
51,510
100
100
100
100
100
100
600
82
25
25
25
25
25
207
40
50
50
50
50
50
290
40
40
75
75
175
175
225
225
225
1,025
3,300
3,300
13.000
13.000
337
350
350
13,400
400
3,700
18,537
2,973
2,973
4,000
16,000
20,000
10,000
10.000
-
4,000
26,000
. -
-
2.973
32,973
337 4,350 26,350 13,400 400 6,673 51,510
t
. 7
cw combined CIP requests 01 xls 1121100
Sources of Funds
Capital Improvement Fund
From Utility & Street Funds
Councilmanic Bonds
Total Sources of Funds
Other General Government Projects
Water Automated Meter Reading/Rate Study
Agricultural Land Preservation
Miscellaneous Projects
Various Department Equipment
Printing Press
Police and Fire Automation
Automation Projects
Total Other General Government Projects
Other General Government Projects
Capital Improvement Program
for Years 2001 - 2006
Recommend
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
771
400
425
400
2,000
425
400
425
400
8,000
425
400
425
400
2.896
2,400
10 000
1,171
2,825
825
8,825
825
825
15,296
30
30
50
50
100
125
125
125
125
125
725
221
221
70
70
8,000
700
2,700
700
700
700
700
6,200
1,171
2,825
825
8,825
825
825
15,296
. 8
e
Sources of Funds
CIP Revenues Required
Total Sources of Funds
Fire & Life Safety
Fire Equipment Replacement Fund
Thermal Imaging Cameras
Breathing Apparatus And Pass Alarm Replacemi
Hurst Tool Replacement
Other Fire & Life Safety Projects
Total Fire & Life Safety
Police
CKCF Work Crew VanrTraller/Equipment
CKCF Camera Upgrade/Renovations
LCD Projector for Classroom
Misc Police Projects
Total Police
total Public Safety Projects
tw combined CIP requests 01 AS 11/21/00
Public Safety
Capital Improvement Program
for Years 2001 - 2006
Recommend
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
490 550 550 550 550 550 3 240
490 550 550 550
550 550 3,240
300 400 400 400
400 400 2.300
35 - -
- - 35
40
40
20
20
75 75 75
75 75 375
395 475 475 475 475 475 2,770
50
50
12
12
20
20
13
75
75
75
75
75
388
95 75 75 75 75 75 470
490 550 550 550 550 550 3,240
Water, Sewer and Stormwater Drainage
Capital Improvement Program
for Years 2001 - 2006
i
Recommend
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Total
Sources of Funds
Water Fund
702
1,542
2,155
1,534
1,547
1,811
9.291
Drainage Utility Fund
2,416
1,786
1,584
1,462
1,525
970
9,743
Revenue Bonds - Drainage
6,279
6,279
Sewer Utility Fund
57
303
315
327
340
354
1.696
Total Sources of Funds
3,175
3,631
4,054
9,602
3,412
3,135
27,009
Sanitary Sewer
Remote Telemetry Upgrades -Phase 1
57
57
Engineering Remodel
73
73
Miscellaneous Sewer Lines
291
303
315
327
340
354
1.930
Total Sanitary Sewer
421
303
315
327
340
354
2,060
Stormwater Drainage Management
Mill Creek Flood & Erosion Control Facility
320
320
256th Street Widening
910
910
Outfall Treatment
300
600
900
Soos Creek Basin Improvements
592
528
4,379
1,900
7,399
Miscellaneous Drainage Improvements
500
658
684
712
740
770
4,064
Military & Reith Intersection
100
100
94th Ave S & Canyon Dr Traffic Signal
250
250
WVH & 277th Intersection
100
100
Military Rd & 272nd Intersection
200
200
Pacific Highway South HOV - Phase 1
500
500
Pacific Highway South HOV - Phase II
785
785
72nd Avenue (196th - 200th)
250
250
218th Street Bridge
300
t
300
1-5 & 277th Intersection Improvement
300
300
120th Ave & 248th Street Improvement
250
250
Salmon Recovery
60
60
Engineering Remodel
73
73
Integrated Pest Management Plan
150
150
Remote Telemetry Upgrades -Phase 1
57
57
Total Stormwater Drainage
3,862
1,786
1,084
5,841
3,425
970
16,968
Water Projects
East Hill Reservoir
1,050
1,300
2,350
Impoundment Project (124th-118th/288th-304th)
300
1,200
1.200
1,450
4,150
Miscellaneous Water Improvements
297
309
521
334
347
361
2,169
Wellhead Protection Plan
250
250
Remote Telemetry Upgrades - Phase 1
172
172
Study -Feed System Evaluation,GWI,Groundwat
100
100
Water Conservation
100
100
Pump Station #3 (Replacement)
75
75
3 -Year Lrg Mtr & Vault Replacement Program
33
33
34
100
Remote Site Security Vulnerability Study
50
50
Update of Kent's Water Comprehensive Plan
75
75
Engineering Remodel
73
73
Total Water
1,075
1,542
2,155
1,534
1,547
1,811
9,664
Total Utility Projects
5,358
3,631
3,554
7,702
5,312
3,135
28,692
10
•eneral Govemment Debt
:;lark Lake Land Bonds 3 0
i ech Plan 2 (StOm/10yr)
East Hill Maim Facility Q5%
Campus Eapansion/Renovabon
Municipal Court - proposed
.ubtotal Debt
/cted
01.,
biic Safety
.ebt Paid By (Other Funds Service
East Hill Maint Facility • 75%
Sobs Creek Basin Drainage Bonds
ubtotal Debt
Debt Principal
30 000,000 30 000 000 30 000 CC;,
13 000 000 9 750 000
6 279 000 6 279 000
16,029,000 15 029 cc:
5000.000 27,279,000 6,273 000
• 11
c�a r— � c cnc0 ory 01 xlar-Ztl IRl'DO
38 552 CCC
City of Kent
Proposed Future Debt Issues
2001.2010
2000
2001 2002 2003
2004 2005
2006 20C' 2CC8 Tota
3 000 000
3 000 000
10 000 000
2 000 000
8 000 000
13 000 000
3 250 000
2300000
3 300 OOC
2 973 000
2 973 000
5.000 000
11.250.000
6,273 000 22 523
30 000,000 30 000 000 30 000 CC;,
13 000 000 9 750 000
6 279 000 6 279 000
16,029,000 15 029 cc:
5000.000 27,279,000 6,273 000
• 11
c�a r— � c cnc0 ory 01 xlar-Ztl IRl'DO
38 552 CCC
CITY OF KENT
FUTURE BOND ISSUES
October 31, 2000
Bond Issue
Purpose
2000 (3) 2001
2002
2003 2004
COUNCILMANIC (LTGO)
Sub -Total
0
0 30,000,000
0 0
Gen Gov't
Parking Garage
4,000,000
Councilmanic
Remaining
Gen Gov't
Performing Arts Center Land'
2.500,000
6.279.000
Gen Gov't
Fac Bldg Remodel & Generators
2,580,000
0 0
0 6,279,000
Public Safety
Police Headquarters Land
1,000,000
5,867,681,774
88,015,227
Public Safety
Two Engine/Aid Fire Apparatus
1,140,000
49.1%
57,806,258
Gen Gov't
Clark Lake Land Bonds 3.0
2,551,600
3,000,000
0 0
Gen Gov't
East Hill Maint Facility - 75% Paid By
Other Funds
58,188,054
13,000,000
Gen Gov't
Tech Plan 2 ($10m/10yr)
88,015,227
2,000,000
8,000.000
26,054,597
Sub -Total
11,220,000 0
5,000,000
0 21,000,000
VOTED
Public Safety
Public Safety Projects
1.5% of
30,000,000
Future
Bonded Debt
Sub -Total
0
0 30,000,000
0 0
REVENUE
Assessed
Councilmanic
Councilmanic
Remaining
Drainage
Soos Creek Basin Drainage Bonds
Capacity
6.279.000
Valuation
Sub -Total
0
0 0
0 6,279,000
CONTRACT
Used
12/31/98
5,867,681,774
88,015,227
Valley Comm
City Portion of Valley Comm Iss
2,551,600
49.1%
57,806,258
343%
Sub -Total
2,551,600
0 0
0 0
TOTAL 13,771,600 0 35,000,000 0 27,279,000
CITY OF KENT
BOND CAPACITY e
October 31, 2000
(1) The forecast beyond 2000 assumes assessed valuation increases at 2.0 percent per year due to estimated inflation plus 1.6% for new construction.
(2) Total is reduced by Enterprise Fund Debt that is supported by Golf and Drainage Funds.
(3) Bond issue for 2000 was completed in October 2000. Not included with Future Councilmanic Debt Included in Counolmaruc Debt totals.
'Amounts do not include debt issuance or bond insurance costs.
.12
1.5% of
Less
Future
Bonded Debt
Percent of
Net Direct
Percent of
Assessed
Assessed
Councilmanic
Councilmanic
Remaining
Capacity
Remaining
Capacity
Valuation (1)
Valuation
Debt
Debt
Capacity
Used
Capacity (2)
Used
12/31/98
5,867,681,774
88,015,227
(43,173,969)
44,841,258
49.1%
57,806,258
343%
04/01/99
5,867,681.775
88.015,227
(42,792,172)
0
45,223,054
48.6%
58,188,054
33.9%
12/01/99
5,867,681,776
88,015,227
(61,960,630)
0
26,054,597
70.4%
39,019,597
55.7%
12/31/99
6,468,731,941
97,030,979
(60,337,630)
0
36,693,349
62.2%
49,073,349
494%
06/30/00
6,468,731.941
97,030,979
(60,019,175)
0
37,011,804
61.9%
49,391,804
491%
12/31/00
7,134,929,227
107,023,938
(70,247,002)
0
36,776,936
65.6%
48,556,936
54.6%
'12/31/01
7,384.651,750
110,769,776
(65,849,114)
0
44,920,663
59.4%
56,050,663
49.4%
12/31/02
7,643.114,561
114,646,718
(61,427,213)
(5,000,000)
48,219,505
57.9%
58,669,505
48.8%
12/31/03
7,910,623,571
118,659,354
(56,775,828)
(4,753,936)
57,129,589
51.9%
66,859,589
43.7%
12/31/04
8,187,495,396
122,812,431
(52,014,463)
(25,494,793)
45,303,175
63.1%
60,528,175
50.7%
(1) The forecast beyond 2000 assumes assessed valuation increases at 2.0 percent per year due to estimated inflation plus 1.6% for new construction.
(2) Total is reduced by Enterprise Fund Debt that is supported by Golf and Drainage Funds.
(3) Bond issue for 2000 was completed in October 2000. Not included with Future Councilmanic Debt Included in Counolmaruc Debt totals.
'Amounts do not include debt issuance or bond insurance costs.
.12
7,000,000
6,000,000
5,000,000
4,000,000
3,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
0
oo� „Ooh ooa Oo^ OOq o1� o1y o` O`� o1q roti` 'yoti'� 1oti.
OExisttng ■Future
Long Term Debt Payments
General Obligation Debt Service
13
1
Existing Issues
Original
Outstanding
Issued
Maturity
Amount
12131100
• GO Refunding 1985, 86, 87
1992
2007
10,575,000
5.440,000
• GO Refunding 1978, 89
1993
2004
2,765,000
1,130,000
• GO Parks / Street
1996
2016
5,595,000
4,885,000
GO Centennial
1996
2026
12,310,000
11.810,000
GO 1999 Bonds
1999
2019
21,205,000
12,035,000
GO 2000 Bonds
2000
2020
19,070,000
20,015,000
Future Issues
Planned
Estimated
Issue Date
Issue Amount
Clark Lake Land Bonds
2002
3,000,000
Tech Plan 2 ($10m/10yr)
2002
2,000,000
Tech Plan 2 ($10m/10yr)
2004
8,000,000
East Hill Maint Facility
2004
13,000,000
Debt service payments include principal and interest and are net of contributions from the Street and Enterprise Funds
' Refunding projects were for Public Safety, Street and Parks projects.
13
'APITAL FACILITIES
PLAN
2000-2001 - 2005-2006
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
Serving Unincorporated King County
Kent, Covington, Auburn, Black Diamond, Renton, SeaTac, Washington
APRIL 2000
EXHIBIT,
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
12033 SE 256"Street
Kent, Washington 98031-6643
(253) 373-7000
SIX-YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2000-2001 - 2005-2006
April 2000
BOARD of DIRECTORS
Bill Boyce
Sandra Collins
Scott Floyd
Mike Jensen
Linda Petersen
ADMINISTRATION
Barbara Grohe, Ph.D.
Superintendent
Daniel L. Moberly
Assistant Superintendent of Business Services
Fred H. High
Executive Director of Finance
Margaret A. Whitney
Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources & Student Support Services
Gwen Dupree
Assistant Superintendent of Secondary Education
Janet Rowe
Interim Assistant Superintendent of Elementary Education & Instructional Services
Kent School DtsMd Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan App 2000
Kent School District No. 415
Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan
2000-2001 - 2005-2006
April 2000
For information on the Plan, please call the
Finance & Planning Department at (253) 373-7295.
Capital Facilities Plan
Contributing Staff
Gwenn Escher-Derdowski, Community Planning Administrator
Joe Zimmer, Finance Department
Clint Marsh, Director of Facilities
Kathy Metzener & Karla Wilkerson, Facilities Department
Kent School District Six -Year capital Facilities Plan April 2000
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
SIX-YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
TABLE of CONTENTS
Section
I
Executive Summary
I I
Six -Year Enrollment Projection
III
Current District "Standard of Service"
I V
Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools
V
Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan
V I
Relocatable Classrooms
V I I
Projected Classroom Capacity
V I I I
Finance Plan and Impact Fee Schedules
I X
Appendixes
Kent School District Six -Year Cap tal Facilities Plan
Page Number
2
4
8
12
15
18
20
25
30
April 2000 Page 1
I Executive Summary
This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Kent
School District (the "District") as the District's facilities planning document, in
compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act,
King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and
Black Diamond. This annual plan update was prepared using data available in
the spring of 2000 for the 1999-2000 school year.
This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the
Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document
for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long
Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into
account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of
facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Any such plan will
be consistent with this Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan.
The Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan has been adopted by
Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn and
included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of
each jurisdiction. An impact fee implementing ordinance for the unincorporated
areas was effective September 15, 1993. This Plan update has also been
submitted to Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, Black Diamond, SeaTac, and
Renton.
A financing plan is included in Section V I I I which demonstrates the District's
ability to implement this Plan.
This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in
order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. While the State
Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for
capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs in the
District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and
ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service
based on specific needs of the District.
Beginning in 1998, the District's standard provides for class size reduction for
grades K - 3 from 26 to 22 students. The District's standard class size for grades
4 - 9 should not exceed 29 students, and class size for grades 10 - 12 should
not exceed 31 students. (See section I I I for more specific information.)
(Continued)
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 2000 Page 2
I Executive Summary (continued)
The capacities of the schools in the District are calculated based on this
standard of service and the existing inventory, which includes some relocatable
classrooms. The District's 1999-2000 program capacity of permanent facilities Is
24,761 which reflects program changes and the reduction of class size in grades
K - 3. Relocatables provide additional transitional capacity until permanent
facilities are completed
Kent School District is the fourth largest district in the state. The actual number
of individual students per the October 1, 1999, head count was 26,346. Full
Time Equivalent (FTE) enrollment for this same period was 25,059.70
(Kindergarten at .5 and excluding Early Childhood Education [ECE] and Running Start students).
The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of
transitional facilities were among subjects studied by the Citizens' Concurrency
Task Force. The Final Report of the Concurrency Task Force was approved by
the Board of Directors on March 10, 1993. Findings and recommendations of
the Concurrency Task Force are discussed further in Section I I I of this Plan.
In subsequent years, the current plan is to maintain surplus capacity consistent
with today's surplus. This surplus is achieved primarily through the transitional
use of relocatables as recommended by the Citizens' Concurrency Task Force.
The Concurrency Task Force reaffirms that, as has been the practice and
philosophy of the Kent School District, and also based on the most recent
recommendation of the Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee, portables are
NOT acceptable as permanent facilities. Portables, or, using the more accurate
but interchangeable term, "relocatables" may be used as interim or transitional
facilities:
1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities.
2. To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased capacity
and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand.
3. To meet unique program requirements.
Use of relocatable and transitional capacity and specific recommendations by
the Concurrency Task Force are further discussed in Section V I of this Plan.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be
updated annually, with changes in the fee schedules adjusted accordingly.
Kent School District Sox -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 2000 Paye 3
I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection
For capital facilities planning, growth projections are based on student yield from
documented residential construction projected over the next six years. (see Table 2)
The student generation factor, as defined on the next page, is the basis for the
growth projections from new developments
King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were
used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system. (see Table 1)
Based on the 1999 percentage, 8.57% of King County live births, together with
proportional growth from new construction, is equivalent to the number of
students projected to enter kindergarten in the district for the next six-year
period. (See Table 2)
Early Childhood Education students (formerly identified as "Preschool Special
Education [SE] or handicapped") are calculated and reported separately on a .5
FTE basis.
The first grade population is traditionally 7 - 8% larger than the kindergarten
population due to growth and transfers to the District from private kindergartens.
Near term projections assume some growth from new developments to be offset
by current local economic conditions. With a few notable exceptions, the
expectation is that enrollment increases will occur District -wide in the long term.
District projections are based on historical growth patterns combined with
continuing development of projects in the pipeline dependent on market and
growth conditions.
The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact
to schools and monitor conditions to reflect adjustments in this assumption. The
six-year enrollment projection anticipates significant enrollment growth from new
development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district.
Information on new residential developments and the completion of these
proposed developments in all jurisdictions may be considered in the District's
future analysis of growth projections.
Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments.
The Kent School District serves six permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King
County, the cities of Covington, Kent and Auburn. The Lake Sawyer area has
recently been annexed to the City of Black Diamond and the western portion of
the district includes a small portion of the City of SeaTac.
(Continued)
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 2000 Page 4
I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection
STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR
(Continued)
"Student Factor" Is defined by code as "the number derived by a school district
to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be
generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student
generated rates for developments completed within the last five years.
Following these guidelines, the student generation factor for Kent School District
is as follows:
Single Family Elementary .515
Junior High .197
Senior High .180
Total .892
Multi -Family Elementary .279
Junior High .086
Senior High .063
Total .428
The student generation factor Is based on a survey of 3,149 single family
dwelling units and 2,998 multi -family dwelling units with no adjustment for
occupancy. Please refer to Appendix E on Page 33 for details of the Student
Generation Factor survey.
The actual number of students In those residential developments was
determined using the District's Education Logistics (EDULOG) Transportation
System. In 3,149 single family dwelling units there were 1,622 elementary
students, 621 junior high students, and 566 senior high students for a total of
2,809 students. In 2,998 multi -family dwelling units, there were 836 elementary
students, 257 junior high students, and 189 senior high students, for a total of
1,282 students.
Kent School District Sac -Year Capital Facilities Plan April. 2000 Page 5
`y
N Z
aW
Z�
U cr
�z
W
oz
J =
O O
2 O
L) LU
U) =
Z N
LU N
Y d
x
W
m
O
U
O
a) ^ o
v m
� �in
i
_
Cco Oi O N v N M Lo O
N oo
r~-
r .- CV cV N N
N
(V N C, C' .�-- co c
N co
OR
OD
rn vV) O
lw ry
N op
O O N C — u') O r- N M r
N O
v
N cV C _ O oOD to C)
N NO .-
7 Ln N
^ r
N OD
VO) o
cr)u7
st
0 O N `-
c� ei
�-- N CO
C31 � t^ 'S V� co M (o er
�
r N N m
N N CV QJ CNO L' r�
f
LK ac
CD C)
CT) cr)
N r`
N L'i
CciM COa00 N O c Clq
i °� 'a N
N ca
ey
�' N r CV CC) O cOp C cl�
r (D O a
W
C) r
P,r M el O O M N N
ci
OD
N00
r CV (1j C? aq.
`co co ^
M O
c0o
Iq
r r r N co W O 0M
C7
LQ
O O O �,> CA °c' L N
R
N (D
a C� C) C) � C) O O O co M M Cif C) t v 11
r
CO co N M ^ ��., 04 C 01 b W
r r N co 1 'c
jr..o
N I�
O r< N
Cl) �- O N C) 1- r
co
C>
N 0)
N N Obi IM CO O M F co
r m
C
r r r ^ co
CV co C h 7
N o M
N
et N N r .- Lr) N ^ ' I
CD Cli O Iwo
N cn a0 CO � cOo . f O N
CV r r CV O M 2
W) r,
r r
Nce) m A
Ole
C3 .- C) .Oy co to M r Os an
0) LQ � Cf Qi co O CO ^ n N .M- Go C O m Go P. u ti
•- r r: r- r
to co v N W) v 3
00
r
.- .- .- N
CV
N r
-O cOp
N O Lr)O Y g
N O
01
C,4 CY 40
40
Lr)
r v-.- `� w C
\
r' C) t
N cri E 2
;
C^) O (C)Oo
N
co co to
Ln co O O N .- ° 2
^ co) O M) co co O co M M co y q y
r O
~ r
r' CV O v o
"' r .- O a O
N
M
I
`- CV o y
O (�
V COco CO O co O COcn r) to N � ao
CV
C) 0 cr1 �. d
r
r' o O
co 0
M r
N r o
DD
t(pp t(N
r (? N M
M O CO � O t O
r COf
(e O O M
rM {p
CO O O 5 N
N
H O U
m t
Z m
m
N CD
J
10
C cc
(D
(D a c
E N
C
N V u
cc N
Ue e
M O CO O O •- N C C
O 0 0
?1
d y y of r. r r 111 C _> 2CD cD
Y Y Y
t7 (}ccW c`o E v
O
} U
'�-
N
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
SIX -YEAR FTE ENROLLMENT PROJECTION
ACTUAL P R
O
J E C T 1
D N
1999 2000 1
2001
1 20022003
23,350 '
2004
2005
-155
-244
73
566
King County Live Births '
21,972
21,817
21,573
21.646
22,212
22.780
23,350 '
Increase / Decrease
-358
-155
-244
73
566
568
570
Kindergarten/ Birth %
8.57%
8.52%
8.50%
8.50%
8.50%
8.50%
8.50%
Easy Childhood Education C 5
58
59
59
60
61
62
63
2 Kindergarten FTE @ .5
942
929
949
974
989
1,038
1,04.4
Grade 1
1,989
2,053
1,963
2,027
2,070
2,126
2,210
Grade 2
2,078
1,975
2,095
2,027
2,082
2,150
2,189
Grade 3
2,111
2,077
2,018
2,162
2,084
2,164
2,215
Grade 4
2,222
2,082
2,118
2,082
2,218
2,165
2,228
Grade 5
2,037
2,179
2,086
2,145
2,100
2,260
2,190
Grade 6
2,119
2,056
2,230
2,160
2,209
2,189
2,332
Grade 7
2,081
2,170
2,113
2,322
2,337
2,318
2,396
Grade 8
2,015
2,020
2,143
2,117
2,409
2,357
2,434
Grade 9
2,102
2,188
2,159
2,320
2,379
2,623
2,664
Grade 10
2,045
2,254
2,353
2,321
2,492
2,555
2,634
Grade 11
1,782
1,866
2,085
2,176
2,145
2,302
2,295
Grade 12
1,537
1,411
1,625
1,814
1,892
1,864
1,936
Total FTE Enrollment
25,118
25,319
25,996
26,707
27,467
28,173
28,830
Nd. 3
Yearly Increase
176
201
677
711
760
706
657
Yearly Increase %
0.72%
0.80%
2.67%
2.74%
2.85%
2.57%
2.33%
Cumulative Increase
288
489
1,166
1,877
2,637
3,343
4,000
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) 25,118 25,319 1 25,996 1 26,707 1 27,467 1 28,173 1 28,830
' Kindergarten projection based on King County actual live birth percentage and proportional growth from new construction
2 Kindergarten FTE enrollment projection at .5 is calculated by using the District's percentage of King County live births
5 years earlier compared to actual kindergarten enrollment in the previous year. (ECE = Early Childhood Education)
3 Oct. 99 P223 Headcount rs 26,103. Oct. 99 full student headcount including 116 Preschool & 236 Running Startin 26.346.
G R O W T H P R O J E C T I O N S - Adjustments for current economic factors
For facilities planning purposes, this six-year enrollment projection anticipates significant enrollment
growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district.
Kent School Distnct Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 April, 20W
Page 7
III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service"
In order to determine the capacity of the District's facilities, the King County
Code refers to a "standard of service" that each school district must establish In
order to ascertain Its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the -
program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs
of special need, and other factors determined by the District which would, in the
District's judgment, best serve its student population.
This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School
District. Relocatables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard
of service as the permanent facilities. (see appendix A, e & C)
The standard of service defined herein may continue to change in the future.
Beginning in 1998, the District's standard class size for grades K - 3 was
reduced from 26 to 22. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic
planning process which may affect aspects of the District's "standard of service".
Future changes to the standard of service will be reflected in future capital
facilities plans.
Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students
Class size for grades K - 3 should not exceed 22 students.
Class size for grades 4 - 6 should not exceed 29 students.
Program capacity for regular education classrooms is calculated at an average
of 25 students per classroom because there are four grade levels at K - 3 and
fluctuations between primary and intermediate grade levels (i.e. Third / Fourth
grade split classes, etc.).
Students may be provided music instruction and physical education in a
separate classroom or facility.
Students may have scheduled time in a special computer lab.
Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self-
contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program.
(continued)
Kent School District sic -Year Capital Facilities Plan April. 2000 Page 8
111 Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued)
Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities In
classrooms for programs designated as follows -
English As a Second Language (ESL)
Self-contained Special Education Programs
Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance)
Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title 1)
Gifted Education
Other Remediation Programs
Learning Assisted Program (LAP)
School Adjustment Programs for severely behavior -disordered students
Hearing Impaired
Mild, Moderate and Severe Developmental Disabilities
Developmental Kindergarten
Early Childhood Education (3-4 yr. old preschool handicapped students)
Some of the above special programs require specialized classroom space, as
well as music and physical education classrooms, computer labs, etc.; thus, the
permanent capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced
Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of
time to receive Instruction In these special programs and space must be
allocated to serve these programs. Some newer buildings have been
constructed to accommodate most of these programs; some older buildings have
been modified, and in some circumstances, these modifications reduce the
classroom capacity of the buildings. When programs change, program capacity
fluctuates and Is updated annually to reflect the change in program and capacity.
Current Standards of Service for Secondary Students
The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and
educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect
the capacity of the school buildings.
Class size for grades 7 - 9 should not exceed 29 students.
Class size for grades 10 - 12 should not exceed 31 students.
Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self-
contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program.
(continued)
Kent School Distnct Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 2000 Page 9
III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued)
Identified students will also be provided - other education opportunities in
classrooms for programs designated as follows.
Computer Labs
English As a Second Language (ESL)
Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance)
Preschool and Daycare
Honors (Gifted) and Advanced Placement Programs
Basic Skills Programs
Traffic Safety Education
JROTC - Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps
Variety of Technical & Applied Programs (Vocational Education)
i.e. Home & Family Life (Cooking, Sewing, Child Development, etc.)
Business Education (Keyboarding, Accounting, Business Law,
Sales & Marketing, etc.) Woods, Metals, Welding, Electronics,
Manufacturing Technology, Auto Shop, Commercial Foods,
Commercial Art, Drafting & Drawing, Electronics, Careers, etc.
Many of these programs and others require specialized classroom space which
can reduce the permanent capacity of the school buildings. In addition, an
alternative home school assistance, choice and transition program is provided
for students in grades 2-12 at Kent Learning Center.
Soace or Classroom_ Utilization
As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized
rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space
during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of
regular teaching stations. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of
classrooms, the District has concluded that the standard utilization rate is 95%
for elementary schools and 85% for secondary schools. In future, the District
will continue close analysis of actual utilization.
Kent School District Citizens' Concurrency Task Force
The Kent School District Board of Directors appointed a Citizens' Concurrency
Task Force, made up of a cross section of the community, to assist in defining
the District's Standard of Service. To accomplish this task, the Task Force was
directed to study Kent School District enrollment history and projections,
demographics and planned new developments, land availability for new schools,
facility capacities and plans, frequency of boundary changes, and portable
(relocatable) vs. permanent facility issues. A meeting for public input was
conducted and the Final Report of the Citizens' Concurrency Task Force was
approved by the Board of Directors on March 10, 1993.
(continued)
Kent School Disinct Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 2000 Page 10
III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued)
The Final Report of the Citizens' Concurrency Task Force Included Findings and
Recommendations and provision for the following long term goals -
A. Seek to reduce classroom utilization rates to allow more
flexibility on the building level.
B. Seek to lower average class size from that established for
the 1992-93 school year.
C. Seek to minimize boundary changes.
D. Ensure that new permanent facilities are designed to accommodate
portables.-
1)
ortables:
1) to resolve current quality concerns
2) to provide for sites for portables to meet increased demand.
E. Pursue modernization of current permanent facilities to resolve
current quality concerns and to provide for additional sites for
portables to meet increased demand.
F Pursue modernization or replacement of current portables to
resolve quality concerns.
G. Ensure that new portables meet current concerns of quality.
H Ensure that all sites for portables be modernized and utilities
be installed to meet quality concerns.
The quality of facilities, when using relocatable facilities, is a
mayor concern of citizens of the Kent School District. Use of
relocatable and transitional capacity as well as more specific
concerns and recommendations by the Task Force are further
discussed in Section V I of this Plan.
The Task Force also states that it has reviewed and accepted the explanation of
methodology and the conclusions reached in the enrollment Forecasting System
report and recommends that methodology not be changed without Board
approval.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Factldles Plan April, 2000 Page 11
I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools
Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 24,761 students
based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section I 11. Included
in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current
capacity. (See Table 3 on Page 13)
The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs. It also
reflects the reduction in class size from 26 to 22 in grades K - 3 which was
implemented in 1998. The class size reduction received voter approval in the
Educational Programs and Operations Levy to continue through 2002.
Since 1997, Kent Learning Center has served grades 2 through 12 with
transition, choice and home school assistance programs. It is located in the
former Grandview School in the western part of the District. This school was
designed and is currently configured as an elementary school.
Calculation of Elementary, Junior High and Senior High School capacities are
set forth in Appendices A, B and C on pages 30 and 31. A map of existing
schools is included on Page 14.
Kent School Distriet Six -Year capital Facilities Plan April, 2000 Paps 12
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS
' Changes to capacity reflect program changes and continued reduction in K-3 class size from 26 to 22.
2 Kent Learning Center serves grades 2 - 12. The building was formerly known as Grandview Elementary.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 Aprl. 2000 Paps 13
1999-2000
Year
SCHOOL
I openedABR
ADDRESS
Program
Capacity '
Carnage Crest Elementary
19W
CC
18235 - 140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058
485
Cedar Valley Elementary
1971
CV
26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042
461
Covington Elementary
1961
CO
17070 SE Wax Road, Covington 98042
542
Crestwood Elementary
19W
CW
25225 - 180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042
428
Daniel Elementary
1992
DE
11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98031
456
East HAI Elementary
1953
EH
9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031
413
Emerald Park
1999
EP
11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031
475
Fanwood Elementary
1969
FW
16600 - 148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058
428
Glenridge Elementary
1996
GR
19405. 120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058
461
Grass Lake Elementary
1971
GL
28700 - 191st Place SE, Kent 98042
447
Horizon Elementary
1990
HE
27641 - 144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042
418
Jenkins Creek Elementary
1987
JC
26915 - 186th Avenue SE. Covington 98042
423
Kent Elementary
1999
KE
24700 - 64th Avenue South, Kent 98032
466
Lake Youngs Elementary
1965
LY
19660 - 142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042
594
Martin Sortun Elementary
1987
MS
12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98031
475
Meadow Ridge Elementary
1994
MR
27710 - 108th Avenue SE, !Cent 98031
447
Meridian Elementary
1939
ME
25621 - 140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042
556
Neely -O'Brien Elementary
1990
NO
6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032
437
Panther take Elementary
1938
PL
20831 - 108th Avenue SE. Kent 98031
380
Park Orchard Elementary
1963
PO
11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031
494
Pine Tree Elementary
1967
PT
27825 - 118th Avenue SE, Kent 98031
523
Ridgewood Elementary
1987
RW
18030 - 162nd Place SE, Renton 98058
523
Sawyer Woods Elementary
1994
SW
31135 228th Avenue SE, Kent 98042
499
Scenic Hill Elementary
1960
SH
26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98031
437
Soos Creek Elementary
1971
SC
12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031
456
Springbrook Elementary
1969
SB
20035 - 100th Avenue SE, Kept 98031
423
Sunrise Elementary
1992
SR
22300 -132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042
532
Elementary TOTAL
12.679
Cedar Heights Junior High
1993
CH
19640 SE 272 Street, Covington 98042
971
Kent Junior High
1952
KJ
620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032
810
Mattson Junior High
1981
MA
16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042
815
Meeker Junior High
1970
MK
126W SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058
897
Meridian Junior High
1958
MJ
23480 - 120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031
753
Northwood Junior High
19%
NW
17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058
959
Sequoia Junior High
1966
SJ
11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98031
812
Junior High TOTAL
6,017
Kent-Mendian Senior High
1951
KM
10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98031
1,391
Kentlake Senior High School
1997
KL
21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042
1.635
Kentndge Senior High
1968
KR
12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031
1,311
Kentwood Senior High
1981
KW
25800 - 164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042
1,312
Senior High TOTAL
5.649
Kent Learning Center (Grandview)
1965
LC
22420 Military Road, Des Moines 98198
416
DISTRICT TOTAL
24 761
' Changes to capacity reflect program changes and continued reduction in K-3 class size from 26 to 22.
2 Kent Learning Center serves grades 2 - 12. The building was formerly known as Grandview Elementary.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 Aprl. 2000 Paps 13
LID
�
C
0
U
Z
C
CM
C Cm k
:
M 0 ;
■
_a
O
�
a) 0%- U q
O —
0
0
>�
2
0 .= 2
LI
�
c U
�
m
�
'C
Y
E
�
■
-
■
_a
�
\
7C
¢
LI
�
�
�
1
�
E
�
}�e
■
ei
gE
$�
2�
2
--
■ -W�Ei
�2
A■
§®a I�
I�
f �I
_
@I
2
|
)£
!) ®
■i�
2 !e
I�
■
.07
; e
\
�C
oL
e
e
'
!£
!
Ste
k
_ GAV UML
eff
}!
}}
ki
.� \ 7C
£ ƒ 2-
3�
�
�
W�o t
/f@ °e /
|
2§
■
_a
&
LI
�
�
�
1
�
E
�
■
ei
2�
2
g
■ -W�Ei
�2
A■
§®a I�
I�
f �I
@I
2
|
)£
■i�
2 !e
I�
p|® 7� 71 ®
� � f
�$
■ �
£ �
■
2 AD -6101H A0111DA OW ■
k
' o-
\ $I
a
.
Fr --
Kent School
District Six -Year CapitalF&COM Plan
r . �
$!
■
k1 �
OAV 9:14_O
d
�
k
cc
e _
2 2 §
k C 2 LY
o
■ o c
$ 2
B k C -J
Page ,4
Y
6
2
V The District's Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan
At the time of preparation of this Plan In spring of 2000, the following projects are
recently completed or under construction In the District:
• Kent Elementary #27a Is located at 24700 - 64'" Avenue S. near downtown Kent The
school opened in January 1999 and students, staff and programs moved from the old
Kent Elementary to the new Kent Elementary at that time. The new school retained the
onglnal name "Kent Elementary" and boundary changes and new programs were
Implemented In the Fall of 1999.
• Emerald Park Elementary #29 Is at 11800 SE 216th Street. The school opened In the fall
of 1999.
Millennium Elementary #30 Is under construction and scheduled to open in the fall of
2000. It is In the city of Kent at 11919 SE 270"Street.
• Construction funding for Elementary #31 and 32 will be presented for voter approval at a
later date. The sites have not been determined
• Junior. High #8 is planned to fill future needs for grades 7 through 9. The Board
authorized purchase of a site for this school at SE 2861" Street on the east side of 124`"
Avenue SE. Timing of the opening of the school is under review and dependent on
enrollment needs and voter approval. Other future facilities are listed in Table 4 and
shown on the site map on page 17.
Each of the elementary schools has capacity planned for approximately 540 students
each, depending on placement of special programs. Junior high schools are planned
for a program capacity of approximately 1,065 students and Kentlake Senior High (#4)
has a current program capacity of 1,635.
County and city planners, decision -makers and school districts are encouraged to
consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and
design plans for new developments This should include sidewalks for pedestrian
safety, pull-outs and tum arounds for school buses.
Included In this Plan Is an Inventory of projects by type, size, location or region, and
estimated completion date. Also Included In the inventory are sites identified by the
District, which are potentially acceptable site alternatives In the future. (see Table 4)
The voter approved 1990 Bond Issue for $105.4 million included funding for the
purchase of eleven sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired
to date are included in this Plan. Funding is secured for purchase of additional sites.
Not all undeveloped properties meet school construction requirements and some
property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs.
Based on voter approval of $130 million in construction funding in February 1994,
Millennium Elementary #30 is the last one to be constructed which has received voter
approval. A $97.5 million bond proposal for the construction of Junior High #8,
Elementary #31 and significant improvements to existing schools is pending voter
approval at the time of preparation of this Plan in the spring of 2000.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 2000 Page 15
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
Projects Planned, Under Construction, or Providing Additional Capacity
Site Acquisitions included
SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE LOCATION Type Status
Projected
Projected
% for
Completion
Program
new
Date
Capacity
Growth
Amoximat! I AOoronmat!
ELEMENTARY (Numbers assigned to future schools may not correlate with number of existing schools.)
Millennium Elementary (0 30) (Funded) 11919 SE 270th St, Kent 98031 New Consaueboe 2000 485 50%
Elementary tt 31 (Unfunded) 2 To be determined ' New Planning 2004 540 75%
Elementary p 32 (Unfunded) 2 To be determined '
JUNIOR HIGH
Junior High p 8 (Unfunded) 2 SE 286th St 8 124 Av SE, Kent
SENIOR HIGH
Kentlake Senior High opened in 1997 and continues to provide capacity
TEMPORARY FACILITIES
Relocatables For placement as needed
SUPPORT FACILITIES
Satellite Bus Facility (Unfunded) 2 To be determined '
OTHER SITES ACQUIRED
New Planning 2005 540 75%
New Planning 2003 1,065 75%
Additional
Capacity
New Planning 2000+ 25.31 each 100%
New Planning
Covington area (Near Mattson JH)
SE 251 & 164 SE, Covington 98042
Covington area (Scarsella)
SE 290 & 156 SE, Kent 98042
Ham Lake area (Pollard)
16820 SE 240, Kent 98042
Horseshoe/Keevies Lake area (West)
SE 332 8 204 SE, Kent 98042
Shady Lake area (Sowers, etc.)
17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98058
So. King Co Activity Center (Nike site)
SE 167 & 170 SE, Renton 98058
Notes:
' Some sites are acquired but placement has not been determined.
2 Unfunded facility needs are pending voter approval.
7 NIA
Land Use
Type Jurisdiction
Elementary
City of Covington
Elementary
ting County
Elementary
Fong County
Junior High
King County
Elementary
Feng County
School or
tang County
Support Facility
Kent School District Sot -Year Capital Facilities Phan Table 4 April, 2000 Page 16
IdL
N
03
W.M-.Www
411
C j
X
fir
_111"r
Icoo JE CA"
X.3 17A
A.A.
-f.S�:;: tz, le
;;j
0
EP
f.,. -tf F,
Vr
v.
E
Z,
Lake
10
LAS me
KENT blL;MlL)lL)L DISTRICT KIL;I NO. 415
Lmim ifexbo r:
Sites Acquired or Under Construction
S z Senior High site
J z Junior High site
F: a Elementary site
X a Support Facility she
t
Map source- KkV Courity PlannhV & Camwifty DeveWpmed Division
Site Weriftation by Kant School District
v
Kent School DmMd Six -Year Capital Fadkin Plan Pop 17
00
V I Relocatable Classrooms
Currently, the District utilizes 155 total relocatables. Of this total, 85 are utilized
to house students in excess of permanent' capacity, 65 are used for program
purposes at school locations, and five for other purposes. (see Appendices A e C D)
Based on enrollment projections and funded permanent facilities, the District
anticipates the need to purchase some relocatables during the next six-year
period.
In the Final Report approved by the Board of Directors on March 10, 1993, the
Kent School District Citizens' Concurrency Task Force reaffirmed that, as has
been the practice and philosophy of the Kent School District, portables (or
"relocatables") are NOT acceptable as permanent facilities.
In addition to the Findings and Recommendations regarding portables listed in
Section I I I, "Standard of Service," the Task Force also listed some specific
concerns in regard to use of portables as Interim or transitional capacity:
I. The quality of facilities, when using relocatable facilities, is a major
concern of citizens of the Kent School District. That the Kent School
District should consider the following factors and priorities when
using, purchasing and modernizing portables:
A. HIGHEST CONCERNS
1. Adequate heat
2. Portable covered walkways, where practical
3. Adequate ventilation
4. Fire Safety
B. MODERATE CONCERNS
1. Adequate air conditioning
2. Security
3. Intercoms / Communication
4. Restroom facilities
5. Storage facilities
6. Crowding / class size
7. Noise
8. Availability of equipment (i.e. projectors, etc.)
9. Lack of water (use bottled water/portable tanks for drain)
(Continued)
Kent School Distnct Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April. 2000 Page 18
V I Relocatable Classrooms (Continued)
For the purpose of clarification, the term "portables" and the more descriptively
accurate term, "relocatables" are used Interchangeably in this Plan as well as in
the Concurrency Task Force Report The reports also reference use of
portables or relocatables as Interim or transitional capacity/facilities.
During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that
all of the District's relocatables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During
the useful life of some of the relocatables, the school-age population may
decline in some communities and increase in others, and these relocatables
provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community.
Although the Citizens' Concurrency Task Force has reaffirmed that portables are
not acceptable as PERMANENT facilities, they did recommend that portables, or
relocatables, may be used as interim or transitional facilities:
1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school
facilities.
2. To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased
capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet
that demand.
3. To meet unique program requirements.
Portables, or relocatables, currently in use will be evaluated resulting in some
being improved and some replaced. Quality concerns will be among those
addressed by the next Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee in review of
capital facilities needs for the next bond issue.
The Plan projects that the District will use relocatables to accommodate interim
housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of relocatables, their
impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the
interrelationship between relocatables, emerging technologies and educational
restructuring will continue to be be examined.
Kent School Distinct Sic -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 2000 Page 19
V I I Projected Six -Year Classroom Capacities
As stated in Section I V, the program capacity study is periodically updated for
changes in special programs and reflects class size reduction in Grades K - 3.
As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3 on Page 13, the
program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison
charts. (See Tables 5& 5 A -&Con pages 21-24)
The first school day of October is set by OSPI as the enrollment count date for
the year. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) student enrollment for October 1, 1999
was 25,059.70 with kindergarten students counted at .5 and excluding Early
Childhood Education students (ECE - preschool special education) and
College -only Running Start FTEs. (See Tables 59 5A -&C on pages 21-24)
A headcount of all students enrolled on October 1, 1999 totals 26,346 which
continues to rank Kent School District as the fourth largest district in the state of
Washington.
Based on the enrollment forecasts, current inventory and capacity, current
standard of service, relocatable capacity, and future planned classroom space,
the District anticipates having sufficient capacity to house students over the next
SIX years. (See Table 5 and Tables 5 A -S -C on Pages 21- 24)
This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There
will be significant need for new schools to accommodate growth within the
District. Some schools, by design, may be opened with relocatables on site.
Boundary changes, limited movement of relocatables, zoning changes, market
conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing
overcrowding and underutilization of facilities in different parts of the District.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 2000 Page 20
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
TOTAL DISTRICT
Permanent Program Capacity' 1 23,820 24,761 25,246 25,246 25,246 26,311 26,851
New Permanent Construction '
Kent Elementary # 27a 466
Kent Elementary replacement
Emerald Park Elementary # 29 475
Millennium Elementary # 30 . 485
Junior High # 8 (Unfunded)4
Elementary # 31 (Unfunded)4
Elementary # 32 (Unfunded)4
1,065
540
540
Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 24,761 25,246 25,246 25,246 26,311 26,851 27,391
Interim Relocatable Capaclt
Elementary Relocatable Capacity Required
475
0
0
75
250
50
SCHOOL YEAR
1999-2000
2000-2001
1 2001-2002
1 2002-2003
1 201)3-2004
1 20042005
1 2005-2006
Actual
P R O J E C T
E D
0
434
682
899
1,085
1,240
Total Relocatable Capacity Required'
678
Permanent Program Capacity' 1 23,820 24,761 25,246 25,246 25,246 26,311 26,851
New Permanent Construction '
Kent Elementary # 27a 466
Kent Elementary replacement
Emerald Park Elementary # 29 475
Millennium Elementary # 30 . 485
Junior High # 8 (Unfunded)4
Elementary # 31 (Unfunded)4
Elementary # 32 (Unfunded)4
1,065
540
540
Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 24,761 25,246 25,246 25,246 26,311 26,851 27,391
Interim Relocatable Capaclt
Elementary Relocatable Capacity Required
475
0
0
75
250
50
0
Junior High Relocatable Capacity Required
203
377
406
754
58
232
435
Senior High Relocatable Capacity Required
0
0
434
682
899
1,085
1,240
Total Relocatable Capacity Required'
678
377
840
1,511
1,207
1,367
1,675
TOTAL CAPACITY ' 1 25,439 1 25,623 1 26,086 1 26,757 1 27,518 1 28,218 1 29,066-
2
TOTAL FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 25,118 25,319 25,996 26,707 27,467 28,173 28,830
DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 1 321 304 90 50 51 45 236
' Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes.
2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment (ie. ECE Preschool Handicapped 8 112 day Kindergarten student = .5)
3 1999-2000 total classroom relocatable capacity is 1,821.
4 Unfunded facility needs are pending voter approval.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 April, 2000 Page 21
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
ELEMENTARY
Elementary Permanent Program Capacity
11,738
13,095
13,580 13,580 13,580 13,580
14,120
Kent Leaming Center - Special Program '
SCHOOL YEAR
1999-2000
2000-2001
1 2001-2002
1 2002-2005
1 2003-2004
1 20042005
1 2005.2006
Actual
P R O J E C T
E D
466
Replacement for old Kent Elementary
Elementary Permanent Program Capacity
11,738
13,095
13,580 13,580 13,580 13,580
14,120
Kent Leaming Center - Special Program '
416
New Permanent Elementary Construction
Kent Elementary # 27a
466
Replacement for old Kent Elementary
Emerald Park Elementary # 29
475
Millennium Elementary # 30
485
Elementary # 31 (Unfunded)4
540
Elementary # 32 (Unfunded)4
540
Subtotal
13,095
13,580
13,580 13,580 13,580 14,120
14,660
475
0
0 75 250 50
0
lRelocatable Capacity Required 2
TOTAL CAPACITY 13,570 13,580 13,580 13,655 13,830 14,170 14,660
FTE ENROLLMENT i PROJECTION 3 1 13,556 13,410 13,518 13,637 13,813 14,154 14,471
SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 14 170 62 18 17 16 189
' Kent Learning Center is a special program at Grandview School serving students in Grades 2 through 12.
The school was designed and is currently configured as an elementary school.
Z Capacity Is based on standard of service for program capacity and is updated periodically to reflect program changes.
3 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or Projection (ECE & Kindergarten = .5)
4 Unfunded facility needs are pending voter approval. _
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A April 2000 Page 22
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
JUNIOR HIGH
Junior High Permanent Program Capacity 6,017 6,017 6,017 6,017 6,017 7,082 7,082
New Permanent Junior High Construction
Junior High # 8 (Unfunded)3 1,065
Subtotal 6,017
6,017
6,017
6,017
7,082
7,082
7,082
SCHOOL YEAR
1999-2000
2000-2001
2001-2002
1 2002-2003
1 2003-2004
1 2004-2005
1 2005-2006
Actual
P R O J E C T
E D
6,771
7,140
7,314
7,517
[SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY
22
Junior High Permanent Program Capacity 6,017 6,017 6,017 6,017 6,017 7,082 7,082
New Permanent Junior High Construction
Junior High # 8 (Unfunded)3 1,065
Subtotal 6,017
6,017
6,017
6,017
7,082
7,082
7,082
lRelocatable Capacity Required' 203
377
406
754
58
232
435
TOTAL CAPACITY ' 1
1 6,220
6,394
6,423
6,771
7,140
7,314
7,517
FTE ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 2 I
6,198
6,378
6,415
6,759
7,125
7,298
7,494 I
[SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY
22
16
8
12
15
16
23
' Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes.
2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment / Projection
Approximately 10 Junior High students are served part of the day at high schools for advanced placement.
3
I Unfunded facility needs are pending voter approval.
Apnl 2000 Page 23
Kent School Distnct Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
SENIOR HIGH'
Senior High Permanent Program Capacity 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649
New Permanent Senior High Cor>struction
subtotal 5,649 5,649 5.649
5,649
5,649
SCHOOL YEAR
1999-2000
2000.2001
1 2001-2002
1 2002-2003
1 20032004
1 2004-2005
1 2005.2006
Actual
P R O J E C T
E D
6,734
6,889
Senior High Permanent Program Capacity 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649
New Permanent Senior High Cor>struction
subtotal 5,649 5,649 5.649
5,649
5,649
5,649
5,649
lRelocatable Capacity Required' 434
682
899
1,085
1,240
TOTAL CAPACITY '
1 5,649 5.649 6.083
6,331
6,548
6,734
6,889
FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION' 5,364 5,531 6.063 6,311 6,529 6,721 6,865
SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 285 118 20 20 19 13 24
' Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes.
2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment, excluding full time Running Start students.
Approximately 10 Junior High students are served part of the day at high schools for advanced placement.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C Aprd 2000 Page 24
V I I I Finance Plan
The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District
plans to finance Improvements for the years 2000 - 2001 through 2005 - 2006
The financing components Include secured and unsecured funding. The plan is
based on voter approval of future bond issues, collection of impact fees under
the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to
State Environmental Policy Act.
Kent Elementary # 27a, replacement for the original Kent Elementary School, is
the last school for which the District expects to receive state matching funds
under the current state funding formula
For the Six -Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates
from Kent School District Facilities Department.
Kent School Distnct Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 2000 Page 25
IA
ogz
F- a
U W
� U
Z
fn Q
C Z
J m
O
2 W
N }
X
Z N
W
Y
Eol8 8 8 N
4A 40 60 6* 401P 60
- N
L
N w
N N
d � Stpp
iA N O v7 r)
b Of Of
N
N N M p
J Q Q Q QCD
o N
�. c m
O r O O N N Ch
N M M M N M N
O gO gO
O �i PS
Cal
V
Q
N tai r
QQ M QN
ZS Zi a
g g c
N Ih U i
N � C
a
ev
N
H
N `� E
N
CL
tV
g C
N
O 8 C 0
8O 10
Ct Lr)
N
O 3
N 1 r E
p � A .Q
p N e, of to E _ `o
N ' O U. A 7
LL 0
IL LL
co Cc Cl)
P aM �! a B
J
J U O C 61 m U 11 O
U.w E v '� : : LL '�° W a H p w 13 > >
L eo E E
o �- d W Z B 3
2 Z A W E _ '" c Z o 12
'" u►
U W N � „ < d O ' c 2
Cl)
Q a C p c
LU LU W
W E : : : w 9� LLCL
m
W W < • �• •
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
Student Generation Factors - Single Family
Student Generation Factors - Multi -Family
SPI Square Footage per Student
Elementary 0.515
Elementary
0.279
Junior High 0.197
Junior High
0.086
Senior High 0.180
Senior High
0.063
Total 0.892
Total
0.428
Projected Student Capacity per Facility
86,212
SPI Square Footage per Student
Elementary
540
Elementary
Junior High
1,065
Junior High
Senior High
1,650
Senior High
Required Site Acreage per Facility
Average Site Cost / Acre
Elementary (required)
11
Elementary
Junior High (required)
21
Junior High
Senior High (required)
27
Senior High
New Facility Construction Cost / Average'
Elementary $9,011,914
Junior High $21,696,026
Senior High -so
' See average calculations on Pg. 27a
Temporary Facility Square Footage
Elementary
86,212
Junior High
25,256
Senior High
21,736
Total • 4%
133,204
Permanent Facility Square Footage
Elementary
1,410,811
Junior High
743,063
Senior High
849,464
Total 96%
3,003,338
Total Facilities Square Footage
Elementary
1,497,023
Junior High
768,319
Senior High
871,200
Total
3,136,542
Developer Provided Sites / Facilities
Value 0
Dwelling Units 0
80
114 1414
120
$0
Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost
Elementary @ 25 $78,504
Junior High @ 29 $78,504
Senior High @ 31 $78,504
State Match Credit
Current State Match Percentage 0.00%
Previous State Match 55.64%
Boeckh Index Factor
Current Boeckh Index $101.27
District Average Assessed Value
Single Family Residence $176,547
District Average Assessed Value
Multi -Family Residence $56,029
District Debt Service Tax Rate
Current / $1000 Rate $2.32
General Obligation Bond Interest Rate
Current Bond Buyer Index 5.94%
Kent School Dcstnct Sbc-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2000 Page 27
For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on the average costs
of the last five elementary schools and the next elementary school, and the
average costs of the last two junior high schools and the next junior high school.
Elementary Schools
Cost
Average
Sawyer Woods
$6,463,054
Meadow Ride
$6,996,325
Glenrid a
$8,032,895
Kent Elements #27a
$10,122,095
Emerald Park #29
$10,957,114
Millennium Elementary #30
$11,500,000
Average Cost of
6 elementary schools
$9,011,914
Junior High Schools
Cost
Average
Cedar Heights
$14,488,028
Northwood
$17,100,049
Junior High #8
$33,500,000
Average Cost of
3 junior high schools
$21,696,026
The impact fee calculations on pages 28 and 29 include a "District Adjustment"
which is equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas drive out
for this year. The reasons for this adjustment include: 1) the district's long-term
commitment to keep impact fee increases as minimal as possible, 2) the courts
have not made a final determination on the validity of the voter approval of tax
increases section of Initiative 695, 3) proposed Initiative 722 would require fee
roll -backs and 4) the district's desire to avoid roll -backs and potential refunds
under either of the above situations.
Kent School Distnct Suc-Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 2000 Page 27a
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence
Formula ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor
Required Site Acreage I Average Site CostlAcre I Facility Capacity I Student Factor
A 1 (Elementary) 11 s0 540 0.515 S000
A 2 (Junior High) 21 $0 1,065 0 197 $000
A 3 (Senior High) 27 $0 1,650 0.180 $000
A —> $000
Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence
Formula- ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio)
Construction Cost I Faulty Capacdy Student Factor I Footage Ratio
B 1 (Elementary) $9,011,914 540
0.515
0.96
$8,25091
B 2 (Junior High) $21,696,026 1,065
0.197
0.96
$3,852.73
B 3 (Senior High) $0 1,650
0180
0.96
$000
D 3 (Senior High) $101.27 120
0.892
B —>
$12,103.63
Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence
D —>
$0.00
Formula ((Facility Cost/ Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary/ Total Square Footage Ratio)
Facility Cost Facildy Capacity
I Student Factor I
Footage Rata
$176.547
C 1 (Elementary) $78,504 25
0.515
0.04
$6469
C 2 (Junior High) $78,504 29
0.197
0.04
$21.33
C 3 (Senior High) $78,504 31
0.180
0.04
$18.23
TC —>
0.892
C —>
$104.25
State Match Credit per Single Family Residence
0
0
Formula Boeckh Index x SPI Square Footaoe x District Match % x Student Factor
0
Boackh Index SPI Footage
Distnct Match %
Student Factor
LJ
D 1 (Elementary) $101.27 80
0
0.515
$000
D 2 (Junior High) $101.27 113.33
0
0.197
$000
D 3 (Senior High) $101.27 120
0
0.180
$0.00
D —>
$0.00
Tax Credit per Single Family Residence
Average Residential Assessed Value
$176.547
Current Debt Service Tax Rate
$2.32
Bond Buyer Index Interest Rate
5.94%
Discount Period (10 Years)
10
TC —>
$3.021.66
Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value
Dwelling Units
0
0
FC —>
0
Fee Recap
A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence
B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence
C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence
Subtotal
D = State Match Credit per Residence
TC = Tax Credit per Residence
Subtotal
$0.00
$12,103.63
$104.25
$12,207.89
$0.00
$3.021.66
$3,021.66
Total Unfunded Need $9,186.23
Developer Fee Obligation
FC = Facility Credit (if applicable)
District Adjustment (See Page 27a for explanation)
Net Fee Obligation per Single Family Residence
$4,593.11
0
($810.65)
$3,782.46
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2000 page 28
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENCE
Site Acquisition Cost per Multifamily Residence Unit
$0.00
Facility Cost
Facility Capacity
Formula ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor
Footage Ratio
Subtotal
Required She Acreage I Average Site Cost/Acre I
Facility Capacity I
Student Factor
25
A 1 (Elementary) 11 s0
540
0.279
$0.00
A 2 (Junior High) 21 $0
1,065
0.086
$000
A 3 (Senior High) 27 s0
1,650
0.063
$000
$78,504
31
A —>
$000
Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit
Formula ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent / Total Square Footage Ratio)
0.428
Construction Cost Facility Capacity
Student Factor I
Footage Ratio
B 1 (Elementary) $9,011,914 540
0.279
0.96
$4,469.91
B 2 (Junior High) $21,696,026 1,065
0.086
0.96
$1.681.90
B 3 (Senior High) s0 1,650
0.063
0.96
$0.00
Student Factor
0.428
B —>
$6,151.81
Temporary Facility Cost per Multifamily Residence Unit
Formula. ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio)
Tax Credit per Multi -Family Residence Unit
Average Residential Assessed Value $56,029
Current Debt Service Tax Rate $2.32
Bond Buyer Index Annual Interest Rate 5.94%
Discount Period (10 Years) 10 TC —> $959.44
Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value I Dwelling Units
0 0 FC —> 0
Fee Recap
A = Site Acquisition per Multi -Family Unit
$0.00
Facility Cost
Facility Capacity
Student Factor I
Footage Ratio
Subtotal
C 1
(Elementary)
$78,504
25
0.279
0.04
$35.04
C 2
(Junior High)
$78,504
29
0.086
0.04
$9.31
C 3
(Senior High)
$78,504
31
0.063
0.04
$6.38
0.428
C —>
$50.74
State Match Credit per Multi -Family Residence Unit
Formula: Boeckh Index
x SPI Square Footage x District Match % x Student Factor
Boeekh Index
SPI Footage
District tiRateh %
Student Factor
D 1
(Elementary)
$101.27
80
0
0.279
$0.00
D 2
(Junior High)
$101.27
113.33
0
0.086
$0.00
D 3
(Senior High)
$101.27
120
0
0.063
$0.00
D —>
$0.00
Tax Credit per Multi -Family Residence Unit
Average Residential Assessed Value $56,029
Current Debt Service Tax Rate $2.32
Bond Buyer Index Annual Interest Rate 5.94%
Discount Period (10 Years) 10 TC —> $959.44
Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value I Dwelling Units
0 0 FC —> 0
Fee Recap
A = Site Acquisition per Multi -Family Unit
$0.00
B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Und
$6,151.81
C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit
$50 74
Subtotal
$6.202.55
D = State Match Credit per MF Unit
$0.00
TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit
$959.44
Subtotal
- $959.44
Total Unfunded Need 65,243.11
Developer Fee Obligation $2.621.55
FC = Facility Credit (if applicable) 0
District Adjustment (See Page 27a for explanation) (6292.06)
Net Fee Obligation per Mufti -Family Residence Unit $2,329.49
Kent School District Sic -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2000 Page 29
IX
Appendixes
Appendix A: Calculations of Capacities for Elementary Schools
Appendix B: Calculations of Capacities for Junior High Schools
Appendix C: Calculations of Capacities for Senior High Schools
Appendix D: Use of Relocatables
Appendix E: Student Generation Factor Survey
Appendix F: Summary of Changes to 1999 Capital Facilities Plan
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 2000
H
Z
W
J
J
O
m
2
W
Z
m
O
v
Q
W
c
A
W
H
LL.
0 N P) b b N N v v N n N m I v P` O b § t0 b r, b n b v � 0
A N N P) N b N 0 P) � N O N t� v b P) 01 m P) 0) A
v v N b N v b v N v b N N iD N N tD N v v N N v v N Yf v p
u
�p p pp p p p p p p p fp p tD p pf p p b
O 8 b 0O O N N SO O 1A O O tQi 8 NNp S O 8 �8 s O O 8 N t0 pg {Np
Q v h Iff Q N O to m N INTI v N N ID N R R INIf N v R v v N tD
P1
in
O O O U1 O O O O O O yQj �j N N N N N w N O N N In O O O N N O I cc
O O O b O O O O O O N N - - - - - t't O N O O O N - O I N
N
r a r O Pf N Pf v v N N Pf l'f o N b PI O b A N O I O
b b N H IA A N b v O N b v A P. v N N 2 v N N g) P) N N !N9
D O NO C14 OO N N N O tD I n
N
N
O
{7 P) v N P) v N Pf v N v N P7 P) N v N v N N N P) P) N P) q
40d
e
c
a
QQe�e�vQ����s�Ln ����VeQ��x
•
A
A '
D 0/ N tD b A O A O) tD A A 0) N O m P) tD b O N N m m A N v n
N - N - - - N - - - - .- - N N - N - - N N N N r N Y
E
8
U> 0 3 W 2 m ?� K j W U a N S D' O J Q O1 �? 2 U m V n
Z a m a N N N1 N y J w u
r-
ul
0
tn V O� E
c o v co 2' �
` w • $ C m O w Y Y w O
a a c 2 a = w p c Wo Y a �b v �•
:2 t O H �•, c Ux Ce
o w C • o o t c W •
w o m i E a g o n o N
U U U O W W LL U' U' 2 -1 Y .� 2 a a d to N H N to be
0
n
r
c
A
CL
2,
X
O
Z,
W
CL
a
Q
m
�1
0
Z
W
CL
CL
a
A
ry
n
U
Qi
a
u
e
A
N i
7
� b
A W
LL
u C
0
CL c
u C
y
R m
V E
0 0
m c
N W
n
d
0
Z
W
CL
a
a
h
rLO
U
a
�
o
J3d
z
�
g
m
O
N
N
LO
co
tp
N
r
m u
CL
h U
I
4S
°
p
�
N
m
cn
Z
N
C
N
c
N
N V
O
a
Y
in
co
=
N
K
C14
�p n
H U
�
g
N
N
g
°
0
m
�
m
N
N
Q
Q
m
h U
0
Ln
co
8
o
o
i 'CIL
hU
d
p°
z
m
O
O
N
m
C
c :'
m
H
u
CML
U
m0
R
�'-
N
S
`o m
z
m
v
as
N
>
a�
C
c"a
U
O
N
E
o
a
•�
a
GD
ui
cc
a
E
m
;r,`o
a
V
V
m
E
a
U
H
t
i
c
m
V
E06
a
t
c
O
�
0cn
cc
C
z
p
n
d
0
Z
W
CL
a
a
vll
{i
X
O
Z
W
CL
a
Q
A
N A O 0 A m m N W
A m n N A N A O —- Q N N N_ m A N m O
N O N N N
m
N m O m N N A A A N N n {0
m A m A Q 0 �O g
co
(n
N O A A
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
r
0
y
O O O O C O O O O
O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
p
0
O
O
U
0
LL
O m m O A 10
N O A N m N m N' f9 N' OI g m N A Q 01 m
O1
U
O
LL
N m A Q {p O N A N
m O� 1A O Q Q1 N N q 1� f)
co
C
r N
O A NO NO O N N N N O 0 A N
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
r
G
O
O p
O O 0 O O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O O O O O O O
0
p
C1
i7
l0
f0
d
d
w
'^
E
Q7
Ol 01 O 0) N N O N m OI A O O A A A A N
{{pp N p n QI A O A m N Q A O
O NO N N
d
E
O A m m O A O O O A �- p N
N Pf O m
V
C
LJJ
{f1 O 10 N W 1f{ N N O A 1�l O ID 10 A
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1P)
c
V
C
d
W
Ih N N p N A N A A N N N A A
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o o
N
0
N
(�
C
O_ 10 �_ N p N N A O m O A A A O) N
N n A 8 1� A N Ol N {0 N A �{p� �p
m m 0 Ol O O h 01 A 0 m 01 m N N A A N O Gf
N
O1
l0
C
0 m {p N m A A A N
A 1A ' N N �1pp A Of f`l
10 O A r m O N N N A N
j-
0 0 0 �- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
�
0
N 0,
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C O O o 0 0 0
mr
c;
N � O NN N O A NN e n N ON AA m C 0 m ON 10
N
NA 12 OV N m
co
co
r
N
•.+
i
Om N l m m N'"o N NN mN O N A N 1D A m A
N N N N N 10 N A N
N
�.
7
N O N Q1 n N A m n Ol
A N N N �' N 0 mN
A
C
C
(D
0
13
E
O
m DI A n 1p A A Of N aa O m N m m 01 n Q r
A N A O Ip N A N N N n N A m A r—, A
N
1G
E
d
1fl A p 01 N OI A N O N OI A n
N Ol fel N A m A A e—, A O^ A
R%
O
w
7
W
co
OI N Ol m N m N N A A
O
N N O t0 N ^ O m A
COO
`✓ N A •:
m
N
N m A m I�f N N
N
n Q 10 W o N
mQ m mOI
ON
Qr
0 y
mO
m ON N NA f�p
8 Q
AOl
r r r0
r 1a'f r r r C4 ^ ID
1 Ap meN Of
�>
N
0 U3: U -� U K ?� K W J U W> Q m C U
W U U N (� '� N N 2 d N U W
d o
C 3 W 3 C O
2
C U y� U
my
C f� G 2 W Y O O
W
W A
o
~
F'
W
c
n
C
cn
E°
E 0 m
E
r
O
O
H
>
o a 4) U) 3 ¢0)
0 O
02 E Z
LFA
`
Y�� Cl 7
o
LL mod g
ME O 0 E o H
aci°' c E
O dcQc
yE °' °'
�i 0 r c 0 c r
C7
Y c.5 0 m
nci E E
E o r E c E r /v 0 d a
Li
1`0 W0. d�iLO0
-J06 3 cCn 3: -00 0
�= a
Eo
M
E
or ate'-��oa E
t m aQ `L0 naQr- CL
00 W
N
aNi`D �y y c N °eD He8 a19i
3'eoQ.0 arQU i° c== aQ ac
y y 0 as ui c W W -0
U
_
O LL C y I 0 Q $? Q O
0
C
O! O Z. LL C (' y C 0' La
d� i
3'D
W O d C y W C Y a
(n
qd 7
M 3-.2 0 vv �•a`r c ov �e c� �� cd a E
0
o hC9�V ca-- a� o 4)CL0
W
U C °o io y �D =' 'a °' E U t
o 0) Z' N y U 0 'C
8 -T20
W 00 . C y Y c mW E am W c E_ a w
I '_ 0� t E W= c
>>0 >c>_
QUUULLLLLL=JJa��fnfnfnlnl�H> 3>
Im,a
CDUULL2 C7._I�tn(nin
Lf
O nr rA N r A? 10 ^ 10 V- 1m 8 N V a
-
in m
A
m O
� � �
10 :- t r 0--
m
W
vll
{i
X
O
Z
W
CL
a
Q
Appendix F - Summary of Changes to April 1999 Capital Facilities Plan
The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated, annually based on previous Plans in
effect since 1993. The primary changes from the April 1999 Plan are summarized here.
Kent Elementary #27a opened in January, 1999 to replace the original Kent
Elementary. The original Kent Elementary building is being leased out and its capacity
is no longer included in the Plan. Emerald Park Elementary #29 opened in September,
1999. Millennium Elementary #30 is under construction and is scheduled to open in
August, 2000.
Changes to capacity continue to reflect reduction in class size for grades K - 3 as well
as annual program changes. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect
purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement of portables between facilities.
Permanent facility costs have been adjusted to reflect averages of costs for schools
built most recently. The district expects to receive no state matching funds for schools
in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded facility needs are
pending voter approval. Impact fee calculations include a "District Adjustment" which is
equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas drive out for this year. See
page 27a for further explanation. '
Student enrollment forecast is updated annually.
Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors include:
ITEM
FROM T TO I Comments
Student Generation Factor
Eleni
0.512
0.515
updated In 1999 Plan
Single Family (SF)
Jr
0.158
0.197
Sr
0.140
0.180
Total
0.840
0.892
Student Generation Factor
Ekm
0.235
0.279
updated in 1999 Plan
Multi -Family (MF)
Jr
0.080
0.086
sr
0.062
0.063
TOW
0.377
0.428
State Match
55.64%
0%
Updated to 1999 Plan
Boeckh Index (Cost per square foot)
$99.83
$101.27
Per SPI
Average Assessed Valuation
SF
$162,224
$176,547
Per Puget Sound ESD
AV - Average of Condominiums & Apts.
MF
$47,652
$56,029
cur Puget sound ESD
Debt Service Tax Rate
62.97
$232
Per King Cm" Awes
General Obligation Bond Interest Rate
5.11%
5.94%
Madre! Rate
Impact Fee - Single Family
SF
$3,782
$3.782
No dwVe to be
Impact Fee - Multi -Family
MF
12.329
$2.329
No dw pe to fee
Kent Schad District &K -Yew CapW FwAbn Plan - APPENDIX F April 2000 Pape 34
Federal Way School'
District No. 210. RECEIVED
Buildingfor the 21st Century
AUG 18 L`:1
CITY o= ';"=NT
PLANNIN3 D�r:,a= "I'M=i1T
1999/00
-
Capital Facilities
:. Plan
Buildingfor the 21st Century
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
1999/00,
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
BOARD OF EDUCATION
Audrey Germanis
Linda Hendrickson
Holly Isaman
Ann Murphy
Jim Storvick
SUPERINTENDENT
Thomas R. Murphy
FEDERAL NAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................ ii
INTRODUCTION.................................................. iii -v
SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Introduction............................................................. 1
Inventory of Educational Facilities ............................. 2
Inventory of Non -Instructional Facilities .................... 3
Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities .......................... 4
Needs Forecast - New Facilities .............................. 5
Six Year Finance Plan .............................................. 6
SECTION 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
Introduction............................................................. 7
Map - Elementary Boundaries .................... 8
Map - Junior High Boundaries .................... 9
Map - Senior High Boundaries ................... 10
SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
Introduction............................................................. 11
Building Capacities ................................................... 12-13
Portable Locations ................................................... 14-15
Student Forecast...................................................... 16-18
Capacity Summaries ................................................. 19-23
King County Impact Fee Calculations ....................... 24-26
SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 1998199 PLAN 27-29
ii
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
INTRODUCTION
In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act
(SHB 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances
of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective
December 21, 1995 as amended, and the City of Kent Ordinance No. 3260 effective
March 1996, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 1998/99 Capital Facilities Plan
as of May 2000.
This Plan has been adopted by King County, the City of Kent and the City of Federal Way
and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This
plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each
jurisdiction. To date, the City of Auburn and City of Des Moines have not adopted a
school impact fee ordinance.
The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within
which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council
adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line
Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal
Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King
County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the
region's need for housing, jobs, services, culture and recreation. This Plan's estimated
population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption.
This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which
requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not
intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare
interim plans consistent with Board policies. Additional plans will be consistent with the
six year Capital Facilities Plan.
iii
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
INTRODUCTION (continued)
On October 12, 1998 the Board of Education approved a recommendation to move to a
Pre K-5 elementary, 6-8 middle school, and 9-12 high school grade configuration
beginning in the fall of 2002 or as additional high school space allows. This grade
configuration is believed to be more responsive to student needs. It will allow for smaller
elementary enrollments with room for lower primary class sizes. The middle school
allows two-year preparation for the WA State 7`h grade test, matches the Federal Way
Public Schools 8h grade gateway test, and matches most western Washington districts.
Middle schools are also thought to be a better way to address the needs of adolescence in a
period of transition from elementary to school to high school. The four-year high school
plan combines the 9-12 graduation credit system, allows two-year preparation from the
10`h grade test, and physically places the high school students together.
Federal Way Public Schools must meet the needs of a growing student and community
population. The District must be flexible with building, programs and staffing to meet the
needs of the 2151 Century, while being financially responsible and sensitive to the current
tax rates. A flexible, cost effective and educationally beneficial approach that integrates
academics and high tech/high skill preparation is needed. By extending the existing debt
and creatively using new and existing facilities, the District can meet these complex needs
with no increase in local tax rates.
Federal Way citizens approved a bond proposal of $83 million on May 18, 1999. This
bond will provide for a comprehensive high school ($44 million); a middle school ($17
million); expansion and improvement of existing schools ($9 million); replacement of
Truman High School ($6 million) and other general improvements ($7 million).
Additional planned improvements included in the bond proposal are: parking and
pedestrian safety, playgrounds and sports fields, new classroom start-up and music
equipment, information systems and networks and emergency communications.
Federal Way Public Schools opened the Internet Academy in the 1996/97 school year.
This program currently serves approximately 710 students, 487 are full time students.
Internet Academy has grown from about 60 students to the current 700 in three years. The
forecast for growth in this program is to serve approximately 750 full time students by the
year 2005.
Internet Academy is currently operating out of leased space consisting of administrative
areas and a computer lab area. Additionally, some lab sections are scheduled in the
current high school facilities during non -school hours. There is an anticipated need of
approximately 2000 square feet of additional space over the next two years. This capacity
is not included in the analysis of instructional spaces. The facility needs are unique to a
program of "distance learners".
iv
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999100 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
The Marketing Academy School operated in.Federal Way for two years from 1997 to
1999. As the District evaluated this program, it was determined that the program was not
meeting the needs of students in the most effective manner. The Marketing Academy
School has not operated this year and there are no plans to start the program in the near
future.
Federal Way Public Academy opened in the 1999/00 school year in six portables on the
Illahee Junior High site. The school served 120 seventh and eigth grade students this year
and will serve 180 — 210 students in grades seven, eight and nine in the 2000/2001 school
year. One additional single wide and one double wide portable will be moved to the site
during the summer of 2000.
SECTION 1
THE CAPTIAL FACILITIES PLAN
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION 1- THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered
to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing
community.
This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and
expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. This is followed by
a Financial Plan which shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and
update modernization needs listed.
1
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
Adelaide
1635 SW 304th Street
Federal Way
98023
Brigadoon
3601 SW 336th Street
Federal Way
98023
Camelot
4041 S 298th Street
Auburn
98001
Enterprise
35101 5th Avenue SW
Federal Way
98023
Green Gables
32607 47th Avenue SW
Federal Way
98023
Lake Dolloff
4200 S 308th Street
Auburn
98001
Lake Grove
303 SW 308th Street
Federal Way
98023
Lakeland
35675 32nd Avenue S
Auburn
98001
Mark Twain
2450 S Star Lake Road
Federal Way
98003
Meredith Hill
5830 S 300th Street
Auburn
98001
Mirror Lake
625 S 314th Street
Federal Way
98003
Nautilus
1000 S 289th Street
Federal Way
98003
Olympic View
2626 SW 327th Street
Federal Way
98023
Panther Lake
34424 1 st Avenue S
Federal Way
98003
Rainier View
3015 S 368th Street
Federal Way
98003
Sherwood Forest
34600 12th Avenue SW
Federal Way
98023
Silver Lake
1310 SW 325th Place
Federal Way
98023
Star Lake
4014 S 270th Street
Kent
98032
Sunnycrest
24629 42nd Avenue S
Kent
98032
Twin Lakes
4400 SW 320th Street
Federal Way
98023
Valhalla
27847 42nd Avenue S
Auburn
98001
Wildwood
2405 S 300th Street
Federal Way
98003
Woodmont
26454 16th Avenue S.
Des Moines
98198
,JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
Federal Way Public Academy
36001 1" Ave S
Federal Way
98003
Illahee
36001 1st Avenue S
Federal Way
98003
Kilo
4400 S 308th Street
Auburn
98001
Lakota
1415 SW 314th Street
Federal Way
98023
Sacajawea
1101 S Dash Point Road
Federal Way
98003
Saghalie
33914 19th Avenue SW
Federal Way
98023
Totem
26630 40th Avenue S
Kent
98032
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
Decatur
2800 SW 320th Street
Federal Way
98023_
Federal Way
30611 16th Avenue S
Federal Way
98003
Thomas Jefferson
4248 S 288th Street
Auburn
98001
ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS
Merit School
31455 28th Ave S
Federal Way
98003
Harry S Truman High School
31455 28th Ave S
Federal Way
98003
LEASED SPACE
Internet Academy
32020 l" Ave S
Federal Way
98003
2
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CURRENT INVENTORY NON -INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES
Developed Property
Administrative Building
MOT Site
Central Kitchen
Federal Way Memorial Field
Leased Space
Community Resource Center
Security Offices
Undeveloped Property
31405 18th Avenue S
Federal Way
98003
1066 S 320th Street
Federal Way
98003
1344 S 308th Street
Federal Way
98003
1300 S 308th Street
Federal Way
98003
1928 S Sea Tac Mall
Federal Way
98003
3081914 1h Ave S
Federal Way
98003
Site # Location
9' 27`h Avenue SW & Dash Point Road
23 SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW
35 S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S
40 E of 10th Avenue SW Between SW 334th & SW 335th Streets
63 E of 47th Avenue SW & SW 314th Place
71 S 344th Street & 46th Avenue S
72 36600 block of Pacific Highway S
84 3737 S 360th Street
85 16`h Ave S and S 364`h Way
96 S 308th Street & 14th Avenue S
Notes:
Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements.
Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the
District.
1 There is a pending sale on this property.
3
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES
EXISTING FACILITY
FUTURE NEEDS
ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF
FUNDS
Truman High School
Modernization with expansion
(1)
Purchase and Relocate
Interim Capacity
(1)
Portables
Decatur High School, Federal
Expansion
(1)
Way High School and
Thomas Jefferson High
School
Various School Sites
Parking Safety; Network
(2)
Upgrades; Automated
Libraries;
Elementary Playgrounds; High
School Sports -Fields;
Emergency Communications.
Notes:
(1) Anticipated source of funds is state matching funds, Impact Fees, future bond issues and/or
non -voted debt issues.
(2) Anticipated source of funds is future bond issues.
4
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/60 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
NEEDS FORECAST - NEW FACILITIES
NEW FACILITY
LOCATION
ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS
New Senior High School
Site 85(1)
(2)
New Middle School
Unknown
(2)
Notes:
(1) Site 85 is the designation for the new senior high school This site, purchased in 2000 is
located at 16`h Ave S and S 364`h Way (District maps will be updated to reflect location).
(2)Anticipated source of funds is state matching funds, Impact Fees, future bond issues and/or
non -voted debt issues.
5
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Six Year Finance Plan
Secured Funding
Sources
2000 2001
2002
2003
2004
2005 Total Revenue!
Impact Fees (1)
S250,000 5462,706
5250,000
51,500,00
FOPTL
5962,7061
Land Sale Funds (2)
5500,000 5750,000
5573,215
$500,000
S10,400,000
S2.323.21 S
Bond Funds (3)
1 59,000,000
S40,800,00d.
New Senior High School Site
S3,200,000
TOTAL
57,750,000 51,212,706
5823,215
5300,000
SO
SO S1'_ 285,921 ;
Unsecured Funding Sources
2000
State Match Funds (5)
• S7,000,00
Bond or Levy Funds (3)
574,000,00
Land Fund Sales (6)
5800,00
act Fees (4)
51,500,00
FOPTL
583,300,000
NEW SCHOOLS
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004 2005
Total Cost
New Middle School
52,000,000
S3,000,000 S12,000,000
517,000,0041
New Senior High School
51,700,000
S10,400,000
S 17.900,000
S10,800,000
I
S40,800,00d.
New Senior High School Site
S3,200,000
+
S3,200,000
MODERNIZATION, AND EXPANSION
Truman Senior High (Alternative)
5500,000
53,500,000
52,000,000
S6,000,OOQ
Expansion Three High Schools
S700,000
56,800,000
57,500,000
Expansion Elementary Schools
SI00,000
51,500,000
S 1,600,00C
TEMPORARY FACILITIES
,
Portables (7)
5362,245
5241,497
S603,74�
OTHER
it
Safety Improvements (Sa)
S1,400,000
S1,600,000
53,000,00
School Improvements (8b)
S1,800,000
S1,300,000
S300,000
S600,000
54,000,00
Facilities Department
5250,000
S250,0001
5250,000
5250,000
5250,000 5250,000
51,500,00
TOTAL
59,912,245
523,850,000
520,691,497
513,750,000
54,750,000 512,250,000
585,203,74
,NOTES:
1 These fees are currently being held in a King County, City of Federal Way and City of Kent impact fee account, and will be
available for use by the District for system improvements.
2 These funds come from various sales of land and are set aside for estimated expenditures
3 These funds will be used for future projects
i These arc projected fees based upon known residential developments in the District over the next six years
5 These funds are projected state matching funds
6 These funds are projected land sale income
7 These fees represent the cost of moving and siting existing portables and purchasing neve portables The District may choose to purchase new
portables in the years shown .This estimate may also include the cost of purchasing these portables.
8a. These projects have been approved by the Board of Directors and cover most schools. These projects do not increase capacity.
These projects inicude parking and pedestrian safety improvements at 15 elementary schools.
8b These projects have been approved by the Board of Directors and cover most schools. These projects do not increase capacity.
These projects include school networks, information and library systems; new classroom start up; elementary playgrounds and high school sports fields;
music equipment; emergency communication.
A
SECTION 2
MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION 2 - MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
Federal Way Public Schools (the District) has twenty-three elementary schools (grades K-6),
seven junior high schools (grades 7-9), three senior high schools (grades 10-12) and two
alternative schools (grades 7-12) for the 1999/00 school year. On April 20, 1996 the Federal
Way Public Schools Board of Education adopted the boundaries for these schools. The following
maps show the service area boundaries for each school for each grade level (Harry S. Truman
High School, Merit School, Internet Academy and Federal Way Public Academy serve students
from throughout the District). The identified boundaries are reviewed annually. Any change in
grade configuration or adoption of programs which affect school populations may necessitate a
change in school service areas.
The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility
infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public
facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that
development. School Districts are different. If the District does not have permanent facilities
available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can
be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities.
Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It is _
recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools.
Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school.
It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a
complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district
and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single
development.
7
8
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BOUNDARIES
f -..� G
E ota ra.0
FEDERAL
WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 210
LEMENTARY SCHOOLS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
Code ••
ode-
•64
•�-
0
Adelaide C� Illahee E-9
G-6
I _ -
+ • I d
6
Bngadoon B-8 66 Kilo
62 Lakota D�
i;ILI ,•=
�•
8
2
Camelot G-5
Enterprise D-9 61 Sacalawea E-5
-
4
Green Gables A-7 70 Saghalie C-8
-�
0
Lake Dolloff G-6 5 Totem G-3 6
a� •` � ,.�,� '
1
Lake Grove DA 8 t F-6Men
.3
Lakeland F•9
_L
2
Mark Twain F� SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
-
!
3
a
:9
Meredith Hi HS
3
_
3 '
6
S
Minor Lake E-6
Naublua E-5 Code
i
S
Olympic View C•7
�•
i
11
Panther Lake E-0 B0 Decatur C-6
i
37
Rainier View F-10 81 Federal Way E-5
11
Sherwood Forest D-8 80 Thomas Jefferson G-4
.o•
`-
u ^•
sl
24
Silver Lake D-7 8 Harry S Truman F-6::
/ ^I .-
26
Star Lake G-3 8 Ment F-6
ES
Sunnycrest G-2
3
Twin Lakes B-6
G-4 Future School Sites —
4
- - �•
- ' 4
:7
7
Valhalla
Wildwood F-5 Surplus Sites —
-
` , •; �'
1
Woodmont F-3
30
Educabonal Service Center F-6 —
I
i • �; + '. u 11O
-
39
Cod - ■
Future Support Services e -
icea —
a
97
Maintenance operation -Transportation E-6
Parks _
'�,
C
and VIC/NIT
,
~ -_ ;I ';'• �• ��
-�
EDERAL
WAY. WASHINGTON
•
i
'
' • I .ii[! 'r•
.�.a
'� ._
•(rte"_
dye. r'i
� _`,
.�-. -,'
_�� ' � + ` -'
•z,- -0 -
r..! ![
- i _-�,^\ i i _ C •,, i [
n .r I(i`^'. `..'.i. °�\, ick-,.. - 1•
�i
•; �o ,�
a! -�+ '.r;
+-••. t
1
�� _ + [
•�'
1 - sae al
.�
A is _1 _ .i.. '!
•l' -' z ; ' i '
e�6Y
`
•[
•-.:i
i
r -
tit +' ;'•
=•'::� f-
—
as
7
,.
-_
�'
•
`
gasI •a
f [
Mae
S
� i 'r as -e
�- • ii' .1 [
. •a yr
so
•
'�
+
a rirlrl' i' � :
I
•ria••• rM� 1aM j , 7--
-~-�i•e,��
FEDERALI
�e
Y 10
!i
WAY
10
+_
+
945-2000
P.
a-' e""" a" w
Rae-•, a Fd— (253)
I
I f G �� H
air iu.....a..•
!1
E
8
Junior High School Boundaries
f FRAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 210 r.
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS t.•,• (: _ : r _ -
Code • Code -• ` . " •i
10 Adelaide C-6 64 Illahee E-9 ti -
16 Bngadoon B-8 66 Kilo G-6
28 Camelot G-5 62 Lakota 0-6
22 Enterprise D-9 61 Sacatawes E•5 -
14 Green Gables A-7 70 Saghalie C•8
i
30 Lake Dolloff G-6 65 Totem G-3
11 Lake Grove D-6 8 Ment F•6 _
S,
]] Lakeland F•9 r
2 Mark Twain F-,
29 Meredith Hill HS SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 3 1 ' ? a 3
6 Mirror Lake E-6
5 Nautilus ES Code. - •' - S
15 Olympic View C•7 ( 1' b • ifi
21 Panther Lake E-8 80 Decatur C-6 :' • —�' a
77 Rainier View F-10 81 Federal Way E•5
41 Sherwood Forest D-8 83 Thomas Jefferson GA
24 Silver lake D•7 8 Harry S Truman F•b �•+• .J- x
26 Star Lake G-3 8 Ment F•6 . jT•,;- '� ' C'
25 Sunn �• �, '
13 Twin Lakes
27 Valhalla G-4 Future School Sites — _ •- �'� P.
4
7 Wildwood FS Surplus Sites —
1 Woodmont F-3
100 Educational Service Center F-6 _ am
99 Future Support Services E-8 _ Code--.
97 Maintenance-0perabons•Tran3portabon E•6
Parks - .. A••' �: .it .' : L
FEDERAL WAY. WASHINGTON and VICINI _ ,!, a 'i . •
S � tet• •t - _, '�
.i r ! , ! • ..
'�, •ear + '`t` .rr', — _� ' i -•Ti.. I• j',,.. /
t _ moi_ t I • '—_- 6
Eli
ro•.r r -yt • : 1 �•' ' ,� i s 220s,
hd
..rte. •nroww iii '! �_+'_- �• i :T e5, S
W.
y� •� ar aN, u � i '
FEDERA=L1
WAS. ,o ,o
• • •'•�• '�•• ?• _ • •� + y
r%i4
Kiiioi q;& r.ra,,.e (253) 945-2000
C,
Senior High School Boundaries
E1._. F.-6 s.-----------.. ......"•.
L WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No 210
FEDERA
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS�-
Code -
code
10 Adelaide C!+
64 Illahee E-9
2
�WWRAC!
16 Bngadoon 64
66 Kilo G-6
D-6
2
1 r
_ _ '
28Camelot GS
62 Lakota
22 Enterprise D-9
6/ Sacalawea E.5
I -
14 Green Gables A-7
70 Saghahs C-8
20 Lake DolloR G-6
65 Totem F
Qi
11 Lake Grove D-68
Merit
•
32 Lakeland F-9
-
S
-r
J
2 Mark Twain F-4
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
-
29 Meredith HILI H3
6 Mirror Lake E-6 _
S Nautilus Ed Code -- ■ $
15 Olympic View C-7
21 Panther Lake E-8 80 Decatur C-6 -
27 Rainier View F-10 81 Federal Way E -S I _ �+ •- t i j
41 Sherwood Forest D-8 83 Thomas Jefferson G-4
24 Silver Lake D-7 8 Harty S. Truman F-6
26 Star Lake GJ 8 Merit F-6 1
25 Sunnycrest G-2 ` 13 Twin Twin Lakes 84i - 4 _
27 Valhalla G-4 Future School Sites — •.i 4
7 WlidwoodFS Surplus Sita$ —
1 Woodmont F-3 — • �'
100 Educational Service Center _ tet
FCenter E-8 ■
Code-- v
r
99 Future Support Services_
97 Maintenance-Operabone-Transportation E-6 ,,..•• ",
Park* -
1 FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON and -VICIN/T t t i , �_� �+ • , - •'' +';'
.o ej •� art... '1� ,� � : � '.
51 1
�WWRAC!
-EN
Qi
�IZ�� eek . �t- ®
EN
'
/
1>
A � 6
�
k
F
rustic SCMOOtS
I
• / 1 1
SECTION 3
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
Building Capacities - The Education Program
Portable Locations
Student Forecast - 2000 through 2005
Capacity Summaries
King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi Family Units
11
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Building Capacities
This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to
ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction
establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into
consideration the education program needs. The District has identified a Building Program
Capacity for each of the schools in the District. This Full Time Equivalent (FTE) capacity is
based on:
• The number of classrooms available in each school
• Any special requirements at each school
• The contracted class load by grade level
In general, the District's current standard provides that the average class size for a standard
classroom for grade K is 24 students , for grades 1-6 is 26 students and grades 7-12 is 25
students. Gate (Gifted and Talented Education) classrooms are 25 students, individual
education programs classrooms are 15 students, and special education classrooms are 12
students. This size is determined based upon current ratios and trends as well as the
classroom physical size. Educational Program Capacities change every year. This analysis is
for the 1999/00 school year. The capacity of an individual school could and does change at
any time depending on program changes which may require additional space.
12
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999100 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITIES
ELEMENTARY BUILDING
PROGRAM CAPACITY
Adelaide
488
Brivadoon
528
Camelot
374
Enterprise
512
Green Gables
494
Lake Dolloff
482
Lake Grove
476
Lakeland
Mark Twain
503
Meredith Hill
498
Mirror Lake
398
Nautilus
542
Olympic View
450
Panther Lake
514
Rainier View
468
Sherwood Forest
550
Silver Lake
528
Star Lake
502
Sunnycrest
462
Twin Lakes
502
Valhalla
494
Wildwood
428
Woodmont
450
1998 TOTAL
Elementary Average 1 484
Notes:
JUNIOR HIGH BUILDING
PROGRAM CAPACITY
Illahee
821
Kilo
854
Lakota
741
Sacajawea
828
Saghalie
768
Totem
709
1998 TOTAL1
Junior High Average 787
SENIOR HIGH BUILDING
PROGRAM CAPACITY
Decatur 1,165
Federal Way
1,394
Thomas Jefferson
1,373
1998 TOTAL
3,932
Senior High Average 1,311
ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL BUILDING
PROGRAM CAPACITY
Merit School
Truman High School 194
1998 TOTAL 210
Elementary program capacities are based on the number of teaching stations
in the building, contracted class site, and special use classrooms in place
during the 99/00 school year. All available instructional space is calculated.
Secondary program capacities are based on peak loading.
The calculation is based on 25 students per available
teaching stations.
Capacities were calculated by the Study and Survey Committee.
13
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Portable Locations
The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic
education. It is not efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for
500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the
year and from year to year.
Portables are used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students until
permanent facilities can be built or boundary adjustments can be made. When permanent
facilities become available, the portable(s) is either moved to another school for an interim
classroom, or used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs. Some portables
may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may
choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. It is the practice and
philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that portables are not acceptable as permanent
facilities.
The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for temporary
educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools.
14
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
PORTABLE LOCATIONS
PORTABLES LOCATED PORTABLES LOCATED
AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS AT SENIOR HIGHS
PORTABLES LOCATED
AT JUNIOR HIGHS
M0�
OrmccrIONAL 1 MUMONAL
Adelaide
3
Brigadoon
I
Camelot
1
Enterprise
2
Green Gables
1
Lake Dollott
3
Lake Grove
2
Lakeland
2
Mark Twain
3
Meredith Hill
2
Mirror Lake
4
Nautilus
Olympic View
2
Panther Lake
3
Rainier View
3
Sherwood Forest
4
Silver Lake
4
Star Lake
4
Sunnycrest
1
Twin Lakes
2 1
Valhalla
Wildwood
Woodmont
2
FOTAL
PORTABLES LOCATED
AT JUNIOR HIGHS
15
X014
W"UMOAAL nMUMONAL
Decatur 4
Federal Way 1
Thomas Jefferson
Truman/Merit 8 1
ITUTAL
PORTABLES LOCATED
AT SUPPORT FACILITIES
5 -Mile Lake I
MOT 1
Clothing Bank 1
TOTAL 1 3
HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES
Mirror Lake 1
C45'MUMOMAL
NON
Wnfi nav"
Federal Way Public Academy
S
1
Illahee
3
Kilo
3
1
Lakota
3
Sacajawea
2
Saghalie
4
Totem
5
TOTAL
25
2
15
X014
W"UMOAAL nMUMONAL
Decatur 4
Federal Way 1
Thomas Jefferson
Truman/Merit 8 1
ITUTAL
PORTABLES LOCATED
AT SUPPORT FACILITIES
5 -Mile Lake I
MOT 1
Clothing Bank 1
TOTAL 1 3
HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES
Mirror Lake 1
Sherwood Forest
1
Total
2
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Student Forecast
Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment
projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The
majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students.
Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected
enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to
enrollment projections.
Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department.
Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school -building totals, grade level
and program level to include vocational and special education students.
The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of
a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a
stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical
information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not
trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The
district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study
several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student
migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades
(kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on
birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for
kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years.
The Federal Way School District is using three distinct methods for projecting student
enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below.
The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are
forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years
of historical information and how they are weighted.
The second method uses enrollment -forecasting software tied to a geographic information
system. MicroSAMTM software establishes survival, migrant and repeater rates for each
grade level in a pre -defined geographic area. These rates are matched to the number of
housing units per area. The rates are then used to project the following year's enrollment
based on the number of planned new housin-units. The software will project for five years.
The third method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows
the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections
for the district level. The Enrollment Mastern" software provides statistical methods
including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods.
This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment.
16
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Short-term budget projections may be more conservative than the standard grade progression
model. For the 1999/00 school year, the district chose the Enrollment Master projection
using standard grade progression model. Standard grade progression is a reasonably accurate
method for the near term future when the near future looks much like the near past.
Long range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort
survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the
projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied
annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they
project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by
Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the
projections published by the Office of Financial management for the State of Washington.
Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The
Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions
comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school
district in the future.
17
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections
Simplified FTE (K Headcount -.5 FTE; Junior High
FTE -.989 Headcount;
Senior High FTE -.932 Headcount)
Total K -12
Percent
School Year
Elementary
Junior High
Senior High
FTE
Change
1993-94
10,545
4,432
3,750
18,727
1994-95
10,505
4,626
3,758
18,889
0.9%
1995-96
10,689
4,838
3,796
19,323
1.1%
1996-97
10,863
4,930
3,913
19,706
1.9010
1997-98
11,123
5,073
4,082
20,278
2.8%
1998-99
11,480
5,080
4,120
20,680
1.9%
1999-00
11,622
5,110
4,348
21,079
1.9%
P2000-01
11,595
5,178
4,436
21,209
0.6%
P2001-01
11,562
5,411
4,465
21,448
1.1%
P2002-03
11,535
5,621
4,480
21,636
0.9100
• P2003-04
9,699
5,571
6,437
21,708
0.3%
P2004-05
9,672
5,570
6,663
21,905
0.9%
P2005-06
9,673
5,659
6,716
22,048
0.601,
• New Configuration
ElementaryK-5
Middle School 6-8
High School 9-12
23,000
I 22,000
21.000
co' 20,000
U
9
r.
-° 19,000
O
0 18,000
17,000
i
16,000
15 000
Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast
3.090
2.5%
i
i
2.0%
o
N
n
0.5%
_, ,. • 0.0%
,c���°$o
School Year
is
C�ZlFTE --*-Percent of Change
tit
aOrri
-1
yes
�p
a11=
'C
t
Z
r
_
:�U
Mf
3%
?rE
i
3.090
2.5%
i
i
2.0%
o
N
n
0.5%
_, ,. • 0.0%
,c���°$o
School Year
is
C�ZlFTE --*-Percent of Change
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Capacity Summaries
All Grades, Elementary, Junior High, and Senior High Schools
The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information and the Student Forecast
information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and
why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures.
The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire
District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, junior high, and
senior high levels individually.
The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in
place each year.
19
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACITY SUMMARY - ALL GRADES
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
Actual
2,275 2,425
-
- Projected
- -
2,425
2,425
CAPACITY
1999
2000
( 2001
2002
Z
2003
2004 2005
--
BUILDING PROGRAM
150
CAPACITY
19,994
19,994
19,968
20,048
2,425 1 2,425
20,472
21,796 21,770
2,425 1
2,425
=�
Add or subtract changes to capacity
c
Special Education Changes
(26)
(26)
(26)
o
(26)
(26)
Truman High modernization and expansion
106
Increase Capacity at Three High Schools
450
ca
New Middle School
800
New High School
C
1,350
Adjusted Program Capacity19,994
19,968
20,048
20,472
21,796
21,770 22,570
ENROLLMENT
Basic FTE Enrollment - 21,079 21,209 21,448 21,636 21,708 1 21,905 22,045
Internet Academy Enrollment 487 550 600 650 680 705 730
1 121,028
Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 20,592 20,659 20,848 20,986 21,200 21,318
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
2,275
2,275 2,425
2,425
2,425
2,425
2,425
PROGRAM CAPACITY
(598)
1 (691)
1 (800) L(514)
768
1 570
1,252
RELOCATABLE CAPACITY
Current Portable Capacity
2,275
2,275 2,425
2,425
2,425
2,425
2,425
Add/Subtract Portable Capacity
Federal Way Public Academy
150
Adjusted Portable Capacity
2,275
2,425 1 2,425
1 2,425 1
2,425 1
2,425 1
2,425
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)-1
PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE
CAPACITY I,677 1,734 1,625 1,911 3,193 2,995 3,677
20
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999100 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACITY
BUILDING PROGRA
CAPACITY
1. Special Education Changes
Adjusted Program Capacity
ENROLLMENT
CAPACITY SUMMARY - ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
^%.Luai
I - - rrujc[acu - -
1999
2000
2001
2002
Z
2003
2003
2004
138
150
150
150
130
130
11,131
11,131
11,105
11,079
11,412
11,053
11,027
11,001
9,542
9,543
Adjusted Portable Capacity
1,325
c
1,400
i 1,3501,350
1,350
1,350
n
n
(26)
(26)
(26)
0
(26)
(26)
ae
c
v
1 °
11,131
11,105
111,079
1 11,053
11,027
11,001
11,001
Basic FTE Enrollment
11,622
11,595
11,562
11,535
F,45871,459
9,699
9,672
9,673
2. Internet Academy
138
150
150
150
130
130
130
Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy
11,484
11,445
11,412
11,385
9,569
9,542
9,543
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
1,325
1,325
1,400
1,400
F,45871,459
1,350
, 1,350
PROGRAM CAPACITY (353)
I (340)
(333) '.
(332)
1,458
RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3.
Current Portable Capacity
1,325
1,325
1,400
1,400
1,350
, 1,350
1,350
Add/Subtract portable capacity
75
Nlove to High School
972
1,060
1,067
(50)
2,808
2,809
2,808
Adjusted Portable Capacity
1,325
1 1,400
1,400
i 1,3501,350
1,350
1,350
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE
CAPACITY
972
1,060
1,067
1,018
2,808
2,809
2,808
NOTES:
1. Add Programs 3 ECEAP, 1 SBD (Severely Behavioral Disordered) and I Pre -School Program.
This reduces Basic Education capacity in the school years indicated.
2. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities.
3. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and
other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily
house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a
calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used
will be based upon actual population needs.
21
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACITY
BUILDING PROGRAM
CAPACITY
1. Add New Middle School
Adjusted Program Capacity
ENROLLMENT
CAPACITY SUMMARY - JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
Basic FTE Enrollment
Actual
5,178
- -
Projected
- -
5,572
5,570
5,659
2. Internet Academy
1999
2000 1
2001
2002
Z
2003
1 2004 1
2005
Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy
421
4,978
5,196
5,371
5,297
5,295
5,384
4,721
4,721
4,721
4,721
n
4,721
4,721
4,721
700
L•
n
2
800
.
ca
c
v
o
4,721
4,721
4,721
1 4,72
1 4,721
1 4,721
1 5,521
Basic FTE Enrollment
5,110
5,178
5,421
5,621
5,572
5,570
5,659
2. Internet Academy
185
14,925
200
225
250
275
275
275
Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy
421
4,978
5,196
5,371
5,297
5,295
5,384
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
625
625
700
700
700
700
700
PROGRAM CAPACITY
(204)
(257)
(475)
(650)
(576)
(574)
137
RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3.
Current Portable Capacity
625
625
700
700
700
700
700
Add/Subtract portable capacity
1
4. Federal Way Public Academy
421
75
225
50
124
126
837
Adjusted Portable Capacity
625
700
700
700
700
700
700
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE
1
CAPACITY
421
443
225
50
124
126
837
NOTES:
1. Add new middle school
2. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities.
3. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and
other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily
house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a
calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used
will be based upon actual population needs.
4 Federal Way Public Academy will increase capacity atone junior high site.
22
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACITY SUMMARY - SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
Basic FTE Enrollment
Actual
4,436
- -
Projected
- -
6,437
6,663
6,716
CAPACITY
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Basic Ed without Internet Academy
4,184
4,236
4,240
4,230
z
6,162
6,363
6,391
BUILDING PROGRAM
325
325
1 325
1 375 1
F 375
1 375
375
CAPACITY
4,142
4,142
4,142
4,248
n
4,698
6,048
6,048
U
G
n
Add or subtract changes in capacity
1. Truman Remodel
106
2. Add Capacity to Three High Schools
450
3. Add New High School
1,350
c
r
k6–,0-48
Adjusted Program Capacity
4,142
4,142
4,248
4,698
6,048
6,048
ENROLLMENT
Basic FTE Enrollment
4,348
4,436
4,465
4,480
6,437
6,663
6,716
4. Internet Academy
164
200
1
225
250
275
300
325
Basic Ed without Internet Academy
4,184
4,236
4,240
4,230
6,162
6,363
6,391
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
325
325
325
325
375
1
1
PROGRAM CAPACITY
1 (42)
(94)
8
468
(114)
(315)
(343)
DrT !lrATART.P rAPACITY 5
Current Portable Capacity
325
325
325
325
375
375
375
Add\Subtract portable capacity
1
1
Add from Elementary
283
231
333
50
261
60
32
Adjusted Portable Capacity
325
325
1 325
1 375 1
F 375
1 375
375
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE
1
1
CAPACITY
283
231
333
843
261
60
32
NOTES:
1. Truman High School modernization and expansion
2. Add capacity to three existing high schools
3. Add new high school
4. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities.
5. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and
other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily
house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a
calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used
will be based upon actual population needs.
23
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Kind County, the City of Federal Way, and the City of Kent ImRact Fee Calculations
Single and Multi -Family Residences
Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to
help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities.
To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was
established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was also substanially
adopted by the City of Federal Way and Dent. The formula requires the District to establish a
"Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school
district by each new single or multi -family unit and to gather some standard construction
costs, which are unique to that district.
- STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS
Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single
family units and multi -family units. The factors used in the 1999/00 Capital Facilities Plan
were derived using actual generation factors from single family units and multi -family units,
which were constructed in the last five- (5) years.
- IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
Following the calculations for the student generation factor is a copy of the Impact Fee
Calculation for single family and multi -family units based on King County Code 21A and the
Growth Management Act.
Single Family Units
Multi -Family Units
24
r�
Ln
N
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
IMPACT FEE
School Site Acquisition Cost: Student Student
Facility Cost / Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/
Acreaee Acre Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR
0.00
SO
484
0.2939
0.0656
SO 50
20.00
550,000
800
0.1530
0.0246
S191 S311
40.00
580,000
_........_...-_-R-._.___
1,350
0.1548
.-.__.__.___06 _
0.0656
5367 5155
Elementary
SO
484
._
Middle School
.-. 0.0656
SO SO
Sr High
_ -___ _
S17,000,000
_- _ ..__ _
800
School Construction Cost:
0.0246
% Perm Fac./
Facility
Total So Ft
Cost
Elementary
Middle School
Sr High
1V1AL I 33D8 1 JliSb
Student Student
Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/
Caoaciry SFR MFR SFR MFR
96.70%
SO
484
._
0.2939
.-. 0.0656
SO SO
............_ _ o
96.7_0%
_ -___ _
S17,000,000
_- _ ..__ _
800
��___.____
0.1530
0.0246
$3,144 5505
96.70%
$40,800,000
1,350
0.1548
0.0656
54,524 51,917
TOTAL
57,668 52,423
Temporary Facility Cost: Student Student
%Temp Fac. Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/
Total So Ft Cost Size SFR MFR SFR MFR
Elementary
Middle School
Sr High
3.30%
560,374
25
0.2939
0.0656
S23 S5
......_._.. ._
30%.
1100.006
25
0.1530
0.0246
S12 S2
3.30%
_S60,374_
S60,374
--25
_ _
- - 0.1548
0.0656
S12 SS
TOTAL
S48 S12
State Matching Credit Calculation: Student
Boeck Cost/ Sq. Ft. State Factor
So Ft Student Match SFR
Elementary
Middle School
New Sr High
Student
Factor Cost/ Cost/
MFR SFR MFR
5101.39
0
0.00%
0.2939
0.0656
SO SO
Q1�39
1100.006
S 1.42
_
�� 0.1530
0.0246
SO SO
5101.39
120
60.62%
0.1548
0.0656
51,142 S484
Total
I S1,142 I S484
I
Tax Payment Credit Calculation
Average Assessed Value (April 2000)
Capital Bond Interest Rate (April 2000)
Net Present Value of Average Dwelling
Years Amortized
Property Tar Levy Rate
Present Value of Revenue Stream
SFR MFR
S163,436
545,536
5.94%
51,206,330
__5.94%
5336,104
10
_
10�
S 1.42
S 1.42
51,713
5477
Single Family
Multi -Family
Residences
Residences
Mitigation Fee Summary
Site Acquisition Cost
S
558
S
186
Permanent Facility Cost
S
7,668
S
2,423
Temporary Facility Cost
S
48
S
12
State Match Credit
S
(1,142)
S
(484)
Tac Payment Credit
S
(1,713)
S
(477)
Sub -Total
S
5,419
S
1,660
50% Local Share
S
2,710
S
830
Impact Fee
S
2,710
S
830
26
rLLLM1d. n A & A a,--- uvuvva.v ----
SECTION
_._
SECTION 4
SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM 1998/99 PLAN
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION 4
SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
The 1999100 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document, based on the 1998/99 Capital
Facilities Plan. The changes between the 1998/99 Plan and the 1999/00 Plan are listed
below.
SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
Marketing Academy is removed from the inventory
INVENTORY OF UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY
Site 85 is added to inventory — purchased site for the new senior high school.
NEEDS FORECAST - NEW FACILITIES
New High School site has been purchased and is removed from the needs forecast.
MOT Site is removed from the needs forecast. This project is not actively being planned at
this time. The current MOT site is not for sale at this time.
SIX YEAR FINANCE PLAN
The Six Year Finance Plan has been rolled forward to reflect 2000/2005
27
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION III - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
CAPACITY
The average capacity of senior high schools is increased from 1232 to 1311. This change is a
result of analysis of current building use and programs in place for the 1999/00 school year.
Building Program Capacities are found on page 13.
PORTABLES
The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables
purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page 15.
STUDENT FORECAST
The Student Forecast now covers 1999 throucrh 2005. The new forecast reflects a decreased
rate of growth. Enrollment History and Projections are found on page 18.
CAPACITY SUMMARY
The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the chancres in the capacities and
student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current building's are shown as
increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 20-23.
IVIPACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY CODE 21A
The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors. The adjustment
made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 1998/99
Capital Facilities Plan and the 1999/00 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page 29.
28
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 1998/99 TO 1999/00
STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS
Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a
period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in
student Generation factors between the 1999/00 Capital Facilities Plan and the 1998/99
Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age
of the developments. Student allocation is also changed to reflect the middle school
configuration. The Student General worksheet is found on page 25.
BVIPACT FEE
Item From/To Comment
Percent of Permanent Facilities 96.95 to Report #3 OSPI
96.70
Percent Temporary Facilities
3.05% to Updated portable inventory
3.30%
Temporary Facility Cost $62,368 to Updated cost of most recently
$60,374 purchased portables
Boeck Cost/Sq. Ft $99.68 to Change per OSPI
$101.39
Sq. Ft. StudentMliddle School 112 to Square Foot Allocation change from
110 Junior High to Middle School
State Match 59.89% to Change per OSPI
60.62%
Average Assessed Value SFR - Per Puaet Sound Educational Service
$153.095 to District (ESD 121)
$163,436
MFR - $35,488
To $45,536
Capital Bond Interest Rate 5.11% to Market Rate
5.94%
29