HomeMy WebLinkAbout3482Ordinance No. 3482
(Amending or Repealing Ordinances)
CFN=377-Comprehensive Plan
Passed 11/2/1999
School Impact Fees — Amends KCC Sec. 12.13.160
Amends Ords. 3222;3281;3412
Amended by Ords. 3546;3591;3637;3675;3730;3777;
3827;3870;3904;3941;3987;4024;4057
The date ["Beginning July 1, 1998"1 has led to confusion This date will be deleted from cover sheets of
ordinance/resolution revision pages This cover sheet will be deleted on electronic pages only, no other
deletions or changes have been made to the document — 6/21/2012
ORDINANCE NO. 2 OU
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City
of Kent, Washington, adopting an amendment to the Kent
Comprehensive Plan by amending the Capital Facilities Plan
element to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent
and Federal Way School Districts and further amending
Section 12.13.160 of the Kent City Code to amend the
school impact fee schedule.
WHEREAS, the City of Kent adopted a school impact fee program as
authorized by the Growth Management Act and RCW 82.02.050; and
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act and Chapter 12.02 of the Kent
City Code authorize the City to amend its Comprehensive Plan only once per calendar
year, except in the case of an emergency, which is defined as an issue of community wide
significance that promotes the public health, safety, and general welfare; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 12.13.070 of the Kent City Code requires that the
Capital Facilities Plans of the school districts be submitted to the City of Kent on an
annual basis for City Council review, and that such review shall occur in conjunction with
any update of the Capital Facilities Plan element of the City's Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, on February 2, 1999, the Kent City Council adopted its
comprehensive plan amendments for 1999 prior to its review of the Capital Facilities
Plans of the Kent and Federal Way School Districts; and
1 School Impact Fee -1999
WHEREAS, adoption of the Kent and Federal Way School Districts
Capital Facilities Plans is a condition precedent to continued collection of impact fees on
behalf of the districts by the City of Kent; and
WHEREAS, the 1999 Kent and Federal Way School Districts' Capital
Facilities Plans were received by the City in April, 1999, and subsequently reviewed for
consistency with the review criteria set forth by the GMA; and
WHEREAS, the City must now amend the Capital Facilities element
of the City's Comprehensive Plan in order to adopt the Capital Facilities Plans of
the Kent and Federal Way School Districts; and
WHEREAS, on September 7, 1999, by Resolution No. 1554, the City
Council declared an emergency pursuant to Chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code for an
emergency Comprehensive Plan Amendment in order to incorporate the Kent and Federal
Way School Districts' Capital Facilities Plans as an element of the Kent Comprehensive
Plan - Capital Facilities Plan Element; and
WHEREAS, on September 27, 1999, the Land Use and Planning Board
reviewed the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent and Federal Way School Districts,
conducted a public hearing, and recommended that the Capital Facilities Plan element of
the Kent Comprehensive Plan be amended to adopt the Capital Facilities Plans for the
Kent and Federal Way School Districts, and that a new fee schedule reflecting the new
base fee schedules be adopted; and
2 School Impact Fee -1999
WHEREAS, on October 19, 1999, the City Council approved the hearing
Examiner's recommendation, NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Capital Facilities Plan element of the Kent
Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to include the Capital Facilities elements of the
Kent and Federal Way School Districts as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 2. Section 12.13.160 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended
as follows:
Sec. 12.13.160. Base fee schedule. The following fee shall be assessed for the
indicated types of development:
School District Single Family Multi -family Multi -family studio
Kent, No. 415 $3,''� 74405 $1,888.40 $ 0.00
$3,782.00 $2,329.00
Federal Way, No. 210 $2,883.00 $ 875.00 $ 0.00
$2,384.00 786.00
SECTION 3. - Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall
not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall
remain in full force and effect.
3 School Impact Fee -1999
SECTION 4. - Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in
force thirty (30) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by
law. 11� _ _ /).
ATTEST:
BRENDA JA
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CLERK
A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
PASSED:
day of
h/ , 1999.
APPROVED:
02
day of
, 1999.
PUBLISHED:
day of
, 1999.
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed
by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the
City of Kent as hereon indicated.
P \Civil\0rdmance\Scha6l1rtmact-19Alrd doe - '
-v (SEAL)
BRENDA JAC B R, CITY CLERK
4 School Impact Fee -1999
PLAN
1999-2000 - 2004-2005
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
Metropolitan King County
Kent, Covington, Auburn, Black Diamond, Renton, SeaTac, Washington
APRIL 1999
EXHIBIT �
CENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
12033 SE 256`" Street
Kent, Washington 98031-6643
(253) 373-7000
SIX-YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
1999-2000 - 2004-2005
April 1999
BOARD of DIRECTORS
Bill Boyce
Sandra Collins
Susan Follmer
Mike Jensen
Linda Petersen
ADMINISTRATION
Marcia D. Slater, Ph.D.
Interim Superintendent
Daniel L. Moberly
Assistant Superintendent of Business Services
Fred H. High
Executive Director of Finance
Gwen Dupree
Assistant Superintendent of Secondary Education
Beverly J. Cheney, Ed.D.
Assistant Superintendent of Elementary Education & Instructional Services
Margaret A. Whitney
Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources & Student Support Services
Kent Keel
Executive Director of Information Technology
Apnl, 1999
Kent School District No. 495
Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan
1999-2000 - 2004-2005
April 1999
For information on the Plan, please call the
Finance & Planning Department at (253) 373-7295.
Capital Facilities Plan
Contributing Staff
Gwenn Escher-Derdowski, Community Planning Administrator
Clint Marsh, Director of Facilities
Kathy Metzener & Karla Wilkerson, facilities Department
Apnl,
1
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
SIX-YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
TABLE of CONTENTS
Section Page Number
I Executive Summary 2
I I Six -Year Enrollment Projection 4
III Current District "Standard of Service" 8
I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools 12
V Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan 15
V I Relocatable Classrooms 1$
V I I Projected Classroom Capacity 20
V I I I Finance Plan and Impact Fee Schedules 25
Ix Appendixes 30
Vent Serol Distnct Six -Year Caoital Facilities Plan Apnt• 1999 Page t
I Executive Summary
This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Kent
School District (the "District") as the District's facilities planning document, in
compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act,
King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn.
This annual plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 1999
for the 1998-99 school year.
This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the
Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document
for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long
Range Capital. Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into
account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of
facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Any such plan will
be consistent with this Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan.
The Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan has been adopted by
Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn and
included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of
each jurisdiction. An impact fee implementing ordinance for the unincorporated
areas was effective September 15, 1993. This Plan update has also been
submitted to Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, Black Diamond, SeaTac, and
Renton.
A financing plan is included in Section V I I I which demonstrates the District's
ability to implement this Plan.
This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in
order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. While the State
Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for
capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs in the
District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and
ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service
based on specific needs of the District.
Beginning in 1998, the District's standard provides for class size reduction for
grades K - 3 from 26 to 22 students. The District's standard class size for grades
4 - 9 should not exceed 29 students, and class size for grades 10 - 12 should
not exceed 31 students. (See Section I I I for more specific information.)
(Continued)
Kent School District Sic -Year Capital Facilities Plan April. 1999 Page 2
I Executive Summary (continued)
The capacities of the schools in the District are calculated based on this
standard of service and the existing inventory, which includes some relocatable
classrooms. The District's 1998-99 program capacity of permanent facilities is
24,093 which reflects program changes and the reduction of class size in grades
K - 3. Relocatables provide additional transitional capacity until permanent
facilities are completed.
Kent School District is the fourth largest district in the state. The actual number
of individual students per the October 1, 1998, head count was 26,074. Full
Time Equivalent (FTE) enrollment for this same period was 24,875.90
(Kindergarten at .5 and excluding Early Childhood Education [ECE] and Running Start students).
The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of
transitional facilities were among subjects studied by the Citizens' Concurrency
Task Force. The Final Report of the Concurrency Task Force was approved by
the Board of Directors on March 10, 1993. Findings and recommendations of
the Concurrency Task Force are discussed further in Section I I I of this Plan.
In subsequent years, the current pl-sn is to maintain surplus capacity consistent
with today's surplus. This surplus is achieved primarily through the transitional
use of relocatables as recommended by the Citizens' Concurrency Task Force.
The Concurrency Task Force reaffirms that, as has been the practice and
philosophy of the Kent School District, and also based on the most recent
recommendation of the Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee, portables are
NOT acceptable as permanent facilities. Portables, or, using the more accurate
but interchangeable term, "relocatables" may be used as interim or transitional
facilities:
1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities.
2. To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased capacity
and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand.
3. To meet unique program requirements.
Use of relocatable and transitional capacity and specific recommendations by
the Concurrency Task Force are further discussed in Section V I of this Plan.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be
updated annually, with changes in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 1999 Page 3
I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection
For capital facilities planning, growth projections are based on student yield from
documented residential construction projected over the next six years. (See Table 2)
The student generation factor, as defined on the next page, is the basis for the
growth projections from new developments.
King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were
used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system. (See Table !)
Based on the 1998 percentage, 8.28% of King County live births. together with
proportional growth from new construction, is equivalent to the number of
students projected to enter kindergarten in the district for the next six-year
period. (See Table 2)
Early Childhood Education students (formerly identified as "Preschool Special
Education [SE] or handicapped") are calculated and reported separately on a .5
FTE basis.
The first grade population is traditionally 7 - 8% larger than the kindergarten
population due to growth and transfers to the District from private kindergartens.
Near term projections assume some growth from new developments to be offset
by current local economic conditions. With a few notable exceptions, the
expectation is that enrollment increases will occur District -wide in the long term.
District projections are based on historical growth patterns combined with
continuing development of projects in the pipeline dependent on market and
growth conditions.
The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact
to schools and monitor conditions to reflect adjustments in this assumption. The
six-year enrollment projection anticipates significant enrollment growth from new
development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district.
Information on new residential developments and the completion of these
proposed developments in all jurisdictions may be considered in the District's
future analysis of growth projections.
Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments.
The Kent School District serves six permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King
County, the cities of Covington, Kent and Auburn. The Lake Sawyer area has
recently been annexed to the City of Black Diamond and the western portion of
the district includes a small portion of the City of SeaTac.
(Continued)
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 1999 Page 4
I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection (continued)
STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR
"Student Factor" is defined by code as "the number derived by a school district
to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be
generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student
generated rates for developments completed within the last five years.
Following these guidelines, the student generation factor for Kent School District
is as follows:
Single Family Elementary .515
Junior High .197
Senior High .180
Total .892
Multi -Family Elementary .279
Junior High .086
Senior High .063
Total .428
The student generation factor is based on a survey of 3,149 single family
dwelling units and 2,998 multi -family dwelling units. There was no adjustment for
occupancy and studio apartments were excluded. Please refer to Appendix E on
Page 33 for details of the Student Generation Factor survey.
The actual number of students in those residential developments was
determined using the District's Education Logistics (EDULOG) Transportation
System. In 3,149 single family dwelling units there were 1,622 elementary
students, 621 junior high students, and 566 senior high students for a total of
2,809 students. In 2,998 multi -family dwelling units, there were 836 elementary
students, 257 junior high students, and 189 senior high students, for a total of
1,282 students.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April. 1999 Page 5
r �
Q
O ~
Z
F-
V Z
H
N J
OJ
J0
7 0:
Z
w
U) W
m
ZO
uj ~
Y V
C'1
p N ^ N O O N
_ N
00 O
O N O `� v7 c0 cc a
Cn Q1 Q1 C)
N CO ^
N N N N N CV ry �? tD 6n`r
L
v7 N
N aj
a
co
`tr N v T
O q v O v O
tT C) Of CO t0 °q
N CO ^
N (Ni in ._
N N N N �- CO
j
t CD
N
LIL
mN
At
N N r4mNM
W).- r co
i
NN
O Qj OGo tcoN
�.
a-
N C7
TN
if
YOy r N m M tff ^ c0
a N co ^
_
C ::tto O CA CO epi. COD. n � v c4i ^ O
�
to
co pp
P
>s
N
7
O
m M
NN
cv
a AMCV)A
t71 Cf CO 01 w co O O C) N
O O to i\
N co V-
V- r r r r M
Y
H
r r r r r r r c'9
N O
Cl N
� N
M
cm Qf'f ti r' tp O CA
r
o
.�
N P-
Cf
T
QO Cr N (7)r
O O C!CA QOj c CO
to Q1 O
Y Q
N r
f'�t� M T C
N N r r r
T r r T r r C7 t0
V-
~ c
h
CV tD
A
`
M M
Q N
r r
CA N t-
U
m (Q
m
N
O
N gn co O CO _O tp O
O W C)i. Of COD CO ti N co Ch
C
N Cn
N r r t0 t00. et N
C
T r
O Lc
N
a N
o ae
M � �
tD N N co
Kf COD
O
co m N COV .M- CO
C7f CC) C7� CO i\ tp CO " N V-
r
a
� N
aD b
r T r r r N T
4
/•�
$q
r� CD
W ^
_
°D CCO lw
ND. ti N O O
A a t
F..
O �"'
tN0_ cN0 v 01 t0 tOn
•"'
r
r r r r r r r r r r r T CA N
a
N M
d 22t
a co to
^ N i cD aD co N N O M
3
T co r
tMO_ tt
K) M v M N T 'W
r r r r O M
v
`
T r r r T T r T CD
tL m
..
M�
n y
r
4n
COCl) CO�°
I CMD O 0) coN N
n. g
COO CO r CO c07 O ti c o
Cn CO ct9 to CT it M M �= N
O
U v
T CO r
tT N M O
�"' r r r r r
t
N Y O
r T r r r T to t0
T r
C t� 10
T p
W tp7 co O N tD .N- tto O to to M to
ul H
N .t
ao T ? M N M c 1 M ai v q
C�
co r r T ^ N t01
]Z c
r T ^ r r r CO t0 CO
C 00 N
_R
T
a7 U U
Cl
N •
d 7
a
L p
v 2
5
.0
•
7 NY
tar
t�
a H
q S
CL
J a
N
R
>%.2
0
1
� r r
c cII
O= Q7 p�
N M Q to tD f� CD O O T N C V >
001
g
-'
U
Cil Ci) Q7
W C
O tU til d O O
E >
v
C C
4? O m O i0 D,
_
R
Y Y Y C�
R R t`C CU tO O CC t9 CD CO N v
C� C7 `- � �. m E O
Y
C7 C7 C� C7 C7 C7 co
c
u
c
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
SIX -YEAR ENROLLMENT PROJECTION
ACTUAL P R
O 1 E
C T I
O N
1998 1 1999 t
2000
1 2001 11
2002
It 2003 TF2004
-719
-358
-155
-399
73
King County Live Births '
22,330
21,972
21,817
21,573
21,646
21,719
21,792
Increase / Decrease
-719
-358
-155
-399
73
73
73
Kindergarten/ Birth % 2
8.28%
8.28%
8.28%
8.28%
8.28%
8.28%
8.28%
' Early Childhood EdU"UW G
44
56
58
60
62
65
68
Kindergarten FTE .5
925
896
939
965
994
1,037
1,076
Grade 1
2,064
1,917
1,965
2,043
2,086
2,155
2,225
Grade- 2
2,095
2,056
1,990
2,038
2,117
2,158
2,228
Grade 3
2,208
2,079
2,131
2,065
2,113
2,192
2,232
Grade 4
2,045
2,173
2,130
2,182
2,117
2,164
2,243
Grade 5
2,108
2,053
2,282
2,236
2,289
2,220
2,267
Grade 6
2,045
2,110
2,139
2,369
2,327
2,375
2,305
Grade 7
2,063
2,054
2,187
2,203
2,422
2,361
2,400
Grade 8
1,970
2,009
2,092
2,224
2,240
2,458
2,398
Grade 9
1,925
1,945
2,047
2,130
2,261
2,277
2,494
Grade 10
1,951
1,904
1,998
2,093
2,164
2,284
2,287
Grade 11
1,846
1,850
1,819
1,909
1,997
2,065
2,179
Grade 12
1,631
1,679
1,718
1,689
1,777
1,861
1,927
Total FTE Enrollment
24,920
24,781
25,495
26,206
26,966
27,672
28,329
NOW. 7
Yearty Increase
315
-139
714
711
760
706
657
Yearly Increase %
1.28%
-0.56%
2.88%
2.79%
2.90%
2.62%
2.37%
Cumulative Increase
288
149
863
1,574
2,334
3,040
3,697
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) 24,920 24,781 1 25,495 1 26,206 1 26,966 1 27,672 28,329
' Kindergarten projection based on King County actual live birth percentage and proportional growth from new constriction.
Z Kindergarten FTE enrollment projection at .5 is calculated by using the District's percentage of King County live births
5 years earlier compared to actual kindergarten enrollment in the previous year. (ECE = Early Childhood Education)
3 Oct. 98 P223 Headcount is 25,905. Oct. 98 full student headcount including 88 Preschool & 180 Running Start = 26,074.
G R O W T H P R O J E C T I O N S - Adjustments for current economic factors
For facilities planning purposes, this six-year enrollment projection anticipates significant enrollment
growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 April, 1999
Page 7
I I I Current Kent School District "Standard of Service"
In order to determine the capacity of the District's facilities, the King County
Code refers to a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in
order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the
program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs
of special need, and other factors determined by the District which would, in the
District's judgment, best serve its student population.
This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School
District. Relocatables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard
of service as the permanent facilities. (see Appendix A, B & C)
The standard of service defined herein may continue to change in the future.
Beginning in 1998, the District's standard class size for grades K - 3 was
reduced from 26 to 22. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic
planning process which may affect aspects of the District's "standard of service".
Future changes to the standard of service will be reflected in future capital
facilities plans.
Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students
Class size for grades K - 3 should not exceed 22 students.
Class size for grades 4 - 6 should not exceed 29 students.
Program capacity for regular education classrooms is calculated at an average
of 25 students per classroom because there are four grade levels at K - 3 and
fluctuations between primary and intermediate grade levels (i.e. Third / Fourth
grade split classes, etc.).
Students may be provided music instruction and physical education in a
separate classroom or facility.
Students may have scheduled time in a special computer lab.
Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self-
contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program.
(continued)
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April. 1999 Page 8
[ I I Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued)
Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in
classrooms for programs designated as follows:
English As a Second Language (ESL)
Self-contained Special Education Programs
Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance)
Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I)
Gifted Education
Other Remediation Programs
Learning Assisted Program (LAP)
School Adjustment Programs for severely behavior -disordered students
Hearing Impaired
Mild, Moderate and Severe Developmental Disabilities
Developmental Kindergarten
Early Childhood Education (3-4 yr. old preschool handicapped students)
Some of the above special programs require specialized classroom space, as
well as music and physical education classrooms, computer labs, etc.; thus, the
permanent capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced.
Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of
time to receive instruction in these special programs and space must be
allocated to serve these programs. Some newer buildings have been
constructed to accommodate most of these programs; some older buildings have
been modified, and in some circumstances, these modifications reduce the
classroom capacity of the buildings. When programs change, program capacity
fluctuates and is updated annually to reflect the change in program and capacity.
Current Standards of Service for Secondary Students
The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and
educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect
the capacity of the school buildings.
Class size for grades 7 - 9 should not exceed 29 students.
Class size for grades 10 - 12 should not exceed 31 students.
Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self-
contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program.
(continued)
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Fauldies Plan April, 1999 Page 9
I I I Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (conenuec)
Identified students will also be provided other education opportunities in
classrooms for programs designated as follows:
Computer Labs
English As a Second Language (ESL)
Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance)
Preschool and Daycare
Honors (Gifted) and Advanced Placement Programs
Basic Skills Programs
Traffic Safety Education
JROTC - Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps
Variety of Technical & Applied Programs (Vocational Education)
i.e. Home & Family Life (Cooking, Sewing, Child Development, etc.)
Business Education (Keyboarding, Accounting, Business Law,
Sales & Marketing, etc.) Woods, Metals, Welding, Electronics,
Manufacturing Technology, Auto Shop, Commercial Foods,
Commercial Art, Drafting & Drawing, Electronics, Careers, etc.
Many of these programs and others require specialized classroom space which
can reduce the permanent capacity of the -school buildings. In addition, an
alternative home school, choice and transition program is provided for students
in grades 2-12 at Kent Leaming Center.
Space or Classroom Utilization
As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized
rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space
during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of
regular teaching stations. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of
classrooms, the District has concluded that the standard utilization rate is 95%
for elementary schools and 85% for secondary schools. In future, the District
will continue close analysis of actual utilization.
Kent School District Citizens' Concurrency Task Force
The Kent School District Board of Directors appointed a Citizens' Concurrency
Task Force, made up of a cross section of the community; to assist in defining
the District's Standard of Service. To accomplish this task, the Task Force was
directed to study Kent School District enrollment history and -projections,
demographics and planned new developments, land availability for new schools,
facility capacities and plans, frequency of boundary changes, and portable
(relocatable) vs. permanent facility issues. A meeting for public input was
conducted and the Final Report of the Citizens' Concurrency Task Force was
approved by the Board of Directors on March 10, 1993.
(continued)
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April. 1999 Page 10
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS
- Changes to capacity reflect program changes and reduction in K-3 class s¢e from 26 to 22.
Kent Schooi Oistnct Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 April, 1999 Page 13
1998-99
Year
SCHOOL
Opened
ABR
ADDRESS
Program
Cap
Carttage Crest Elementary
1990
CC
15235 - 140th Avenue SE. Renton 98=1
455
Cedar Valley Elementary
1971
CV
26500 Timberline Way SE. Covington 98042
413
Covington Elementary
1961
CO
17070 SE Wax Road, Covington 95042
470
Crestwood Elementary
1950
CW
25225 -1 Wh Avenue SE, Covington 95042
451
Daniel Elementary
1992
OE
11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 95031
432
East HIp Elementary
1953
EH
9825 S 240th Street, Kent 96031
413
Fairwood Elementary
1969
FW
16600.145th Avenue SE. Renton 98058
415
Glenridge Elementary
1996
GR
194M -120th Avenue SE. Renton 98058
475
Grass Lake Elementary
1971
GL
257W -191st Plica SE, Kent 96042
447
Ho eon Elementary
1990
HE
27641 -144th Avenue SE. Kent 98042
456
Jenkins Creek Elementary
1987
JC
26915. 156th Avenue SE. Covington 98042
447
Kent Elementary
1938
KE
317.4th Avenue South, Kent 95032
234
Lake Youngs Elementary
1965
LY
19660 -142nd Avenue SE. Kent 98042
546
Martin Sortun Elementary
1987
MS
12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98031
475
Meadow Ridge Elementary
1994
MR
27710 -108th Avenue SE. Kent SW31
447
Meridian Elementary
1939
ME
25621 - 140th Avenue SE. Kent 96042
532
No*-aBrien Elementary
1990
NO
6300 South 236th Street. Kent 98032
413
Panther Lake Elementary
1935
PL
20631 - 105th Avenue SE. Kent 96031
404
Pak Orchard Elementary
1963
PO
11010 SE 232nd Street. Kent 98031
470
Pine Tree Elementary
1967
PT
27825 - 116th Avenue SE, Kent 98031
523
Ridgewood Elementary
1957
RW
15030.162nd Place SE. Renton 96058
523
Sawyer Woods Elementary
1994
SW
31135 228th Avenue SE. Kent 98042
499
Seen ie His Elementary
1960
SH
26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98031
437
Soos Creek Elementary
1971
SC
12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031
432
Spnngbrook Elementary
1969
SS
20035 -100th Avenue SE. Kent 96031
423
Sunrise Elementary
1992
SR
22300 - 132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042
523
Kent Looming Center (Grandview)
1965
LC
22420 Military Road. Des Moines 98198
410
Elementary TOTAL
12.198
Cedar Heights Junior High
1993
CH
19640 SE 272 Street, Covington 98042
1,011
Kent Junior High
1952
KJ
620 North Central Avenue, Kent SW32
826
Mattson Junior High
1981
MA
16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042
827
Meeker Junior High
1970
MK
12600 SE 192nd Street. Renton 98058
897
Mendian Junior High
1958
M.l
23480 - 120th Avenue SE. Kent 98031
769
Northwood Junior High
1996
NW
17007 SE 164th Street, Renton 98058
994
Sequoia Junior High
1960'
Si
11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98031
799
Junior High TOTAL
6,123
Kendake Senior High School
1997
KL
21401 SE 300th Street. Kent 98042
1,648
Kent -Menden Senior High
1951
KM
10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98031
1,487
Kentndge Senior High
1968
KR
12430 SE 208th Street. Kent 98031
1,299
Kentwood Senior High
1981
KW
25800 - 164th Avenue SE. Covington 98042"
1,336
Senior High TOTAL
5,772
DISTRICT TOTAL
24,093
- Changes to capacity reflect program changes and reduction in K-3 class s¢e from 26 to 22.
Kent Schooi Oistnct Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 April, 1999 Page 13
LO
T
�A •
C
N39
h
O_
OO
W
N
Z
O
U
C
Z
j
�'
y
Q)....
C C
C
�cE
cc —0
F— C,m
'�=
rn �
YY
�
co•��
ccn
to
CD
.._.
o
Q
.6—
(lj 0
V cu
o
rn CD
�- c
•Z
'
CL
a
o om
o
�
3s anv Waal
•C
O
Y
�
11
�W 1
a
fW>, C
a
3S a" wovt m • � ,�
•� • a•
3s ," Ww'.
•
a
a � • ai
s
�� as
10-
I
�A •
1
N39
h
O_
W
N
Z
AC -L4% Ate\ LOOM
ul
•W
•�
$W
V
J V` r�
J�
5
tm •
W
C
>
N39
h
O_
W
N
Z
AC -L4% Ate\ LOOM
`3
•W
•�
$W
V
J V` r�
J�
r W
a
�
3s anv Waal
N W
a'
mf a^v FOUw7
s •tO'L°,�
�D
"I
h
O_
W
N
Z
AC -L4% Ate\ LOOM
V
J V` r�
•
N W
a'
mf a^v FOUw7
s •tO'L°,�
V The District's Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan
At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring of 1998, the following projects are
currently underway in the District:
• Elementary #27a is located at 24700 - 64"Avenue S. near downtown Kent. The school
opened in January 1999 and current students, staff and programs moved to the new
location at that time. The new school retains the name Kent Elementary and boundary
changes and new programs will be implemented in the Fall of 1999.
• Emerald Park Elementary #29 is under construction at the northeast comer of SE 216th
Street and 117th Avenue SE. The school is scheduled to open in the fall of 1999.
• Elementary #30 is in the early planning and construction stages and is scheduled to open
in the fall of 2000. It is in the city of Kent at 119`" Avenue SE and SE 270`" Street.
• Junior High #8 is under review to fill future needs for grades 7 through 9. The Board
authorized purchase of a site for this school at SE 286'" Street on the east side of 124`"
Avenue SE. Exact timing of the opening of the school is currently under review and
dependent on enrollment needs. Other future facilities are listed in Table 4 and shown on
the site map on page 17.
• Northwood Junior High (#7) opened in the fall of 1996. Kentlake Senior High opened in
the fall of 1997. Each of these schools, combined with portables, continue to provide
capacity for increases to enrollment from new development.
Each of the elementary schools has capacity planned for approximately 540 students
each, depending on placement of special programs. Junior high schools are planned
for a program capacity of approximately 1,065 students and Kentlake Senior High (#4)
has a current program capacity of 1,648.
County and city planners, decision makers and school districts are encouraged to
consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and
design plans for new developments. This should include sidewalks, pull-outs and tum
arounds for school buses.
Included in this Plan is an inventory of projects by type, size, location or region, and
estimated completion date. Also included in the inventory are sites identified by the
District, which are potentially acceptable site altematives in the future. (see Table 4)
The voter approved 1990 Bond Issue for $105.4 million included funding for the
purchase of eleven sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired
to date are included in this Plan. Funding is secured for purchase of additional sites.
Not all undeveloped properties meet school construction requirements and some
property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs.
Based on voter approval of $130 million in construction funding in February 1994,
elementary schools # 29 and # 30 are the last two to be constructed which have
received voter approval. The Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee is in the process of
reviewing future needs and is expected to make a recommendation to the Board for a
future bond election for capital projects.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Apnl. 1999 Page 15
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
Projects Planned, Under Construction, or Providing Additional Capacity
Site Acquisitions included
EProjected Protected % for
SCHOOL /FACILITY / SITE LOCATION T e Statuspletion Program new
ate I CaoecM Growth
�.: .
SENIOR HIGH
Kenttake Senior High (# 4) 21401 SE 300 St, Kent 98042
TEMPORARY FACILITIES
Reloeatables For placement as needed
SUPPORT FACILITIES
Satellite Bus Facility To be determined 2
OTHER SITES ACQUIRED
Covington area (Near Mattson JH)
Covington area (Scarsella)
Ham lake area (Pollard)
H Lake area (West)
Shady Lake area (Sowers, etc.)
So. King Co. Activity Center (Nike site)
New Open 1997
New Planning 1999+
New Planning 7
SE 251 8 164 SE, Covington 98042
SE 290 8 156 SE, Kent 98042
16820 SE 240. Kent 98042
SE 332 8 204 SE. Kent 98042
17426 SE 192 Street. Renton 98058
SE 167 8 170 SE, Renton 98058
Notes:
' New Kent Elementary # 27a will replace the current Kent Elementary School
2 Some sites are acquired but placement has not been determined.
3 Facility needs are currently being reviewed by Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee.
Kent School Dis:nct Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4
Type
Elementary
Elementary
Elementary
Junior High
Elementary
School or
Support Faality
1,648 40%
Addttior>al
Capacity
25 - 31.a M 100%
NIA
April, 1999 Page 16
Appasn/r I
Aap�wN�
ELEMENTARY
(Numbers assigned to Artune schools may not correlate wrth
number o/ ext`smi; schools.)
Kent Elementary Replacement # 27a n
24700 - 64th Avenue S. KeM
New'
In Program
1999
222 (net)
50%
I Now Kent Elenwntary 0 27a will replace the currant Kent Elementary School
(4W - 234 )
Emerald Park Elementary (rZl) (Funded)
11800 SE 216th St, Kent 98031
New
coewucum
1999
485
50%
Elementary # 30 (Funded)
11919 SE Z70th St, Kent 98031
New
Review
2000
485
50%
Elementary # 31 (Unfunded)
To be determined =
New
Planning
20027
540
7S%
Elementary # 32 (Unfunded)
To be determined =
New
Planning
20037
540
75%
JUNIOR HIGH
Junior High # 8 (Unfunded) 3
SE 286th St & 124 Av SE. Kent
New
Pretirnuary
20037
1.065
75%
Planning
SENIOR HIGH
Kenttake Senior High (# 4) 21401 SE 300 St, Kent 98042
TEMPORARY FACILITIES
Reloeatables For placement as needed
SUPPORT FACILITIES
Satellite Bus Facility To be determined 2
OTHER SITES ACQUIRED
Covington area (Near Mattson JH)
Covington area (Scarsella)
Ham lake area (Pollard)
H Lake area (West)
Shady Lake area (Sowers, etc.)
So. King Co. Activity Center (Nike site)
New Open 1997
New Planning 1999+
New Planning 7
SE 251 8 164 SE, Covington 98042
SE 290 8 156 SE, Kent 98042
16820 SE 240. Kent 98042
SE 332 8 204 SE. Kent 98042
17426 SE 192 Street. Renton 98058
SE 167 8 170 SE, Renton 98058
Notes:
' New Kent Elementary # 27a will replace the current Kent Elementary School
2 Some sites are acquired but placement has not been determined.
3 Facility needs are currently being reviewed by Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee.
Kent School Dis:nct Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4
Type
Elementary
Elementary
Elementary
Junior High
Elementary
School or
Support Faality
1,648 40%
Addttior>al
Capacity
25 - 31.a M 100%
NIA
April, 1999 Page 16
l• ���� tip. + / `j• � ^'}� .!� _ - .y`
1 i't•• ♦ �, y �.. t
;: \ �i- ;r' t• tel♦
� � y ::. � ` .., • :�:..:. • � _ -"'. moi•• ��
411
.AN
It KeLowev-
SOE
r lee
;•�1111ATEnShED �.
^lit•„• •:..!'-'vC� `� 'y~'•,' •t J �`�•v. � Y T• 1 .
Via.! ,. ,;,...I �;: • E'- �.
• 'k: _ !r•{.$,� "�'.:: ;� ,r �� ., E .. K'i .ter t r '
1! Sit Ld. • T� ::'�'t�3-6
\�•IjC- a S�ii� ��`` ..
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 —�
Sites Acquired or Under Construction ! _
S = Senior High site •f = _ '•,,
J Junior High site \ f
E = Elementary site J
X Support Fatality she
ra..�...•r•
Map source hCnp County Planning b Community Devcbprt+errt Drvirion �•
Sne identiricstion tay Km2 School Dtstnd r� ,. •
Kent School Distnct Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Pae 17
April, 1 D90 �'
V I Relocatable Classrooms
Currently, the District utilizes 149 total relocatables. Of this total, 69 are utilized
to house students in excess of permanent capacity, 75 are used for program
purposes at school locations, and five for other purposes. (See Appendices A 8 C 0)
Based on enrollment projections and funded permanent facilities, the District
anticipates the need to purchase some relocatables during the next six-year
period.
In the Final Report approved by the Board of Directors on March 10, 1993, the
Kent School District Citizens' Concurrency Task Force reaffirmed that, as has
been the practice and philosophy of the Kent School District, based on the most
recent recommendation of the Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee, portables
(or "relocatables") are NOT acceptable as permanent facilities.
In addition to the Findings and Recommendations regarding portables listed in
Section I I I, "Standard of Service," the Task Force also listed some specific
concerns in regard to use of portables as interim or transitional capacity:
I. The quality of facilities, when using relocatable facilities, is a major
concern of citizens of the Kent School District. That the Kent School
District should consider the following factors and priorities when
using, purchasing and modernizing portables:
A. HIGHEST CONCERNS
1. Adequate heat
2. Portable covered walkways, where practical
3. Adequate ventilation
4. Fire Safety
B. MODERATE CONCERNS
1. Adequate air conditioning
2. Security
3. Intercoms / Communication
4. Restroom facilities
5. Storage facilities
6. Crowding / class size
7. Noise
8. Availability of equipment (i.e. projectors, etc.)
9. Lack of water (use bottled water/portable tanks for drain)
Kent School District Sm -Year Capital Facilities Plan
(Continued)
April, 1999 Page 18
i i
V I Relocatable ClFissrooms r, (continued)
For the purpose of clarification, the term "portables" and the more descriptively
accurate term, "relocatables" are used interchangeably in this Plan as well as in
the Concurrency Task Force Report. The reports also reference use of
portables or relocatables as interim or transitional capacity/facilities.
During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that
all of the District's relocatables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During
the useful life of some of the relocatables, the school-age population may
decline in some communities and increase in others, and these relocatables
provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community.
Although the Citizens' Concurrency Task Force has reaffirmed that portables are
not acceptable as PERMANENT facilities, they did recommend that portables, or
relocatables, may be used as interim or transitional facilities:
1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school
facilities.
2. To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased
capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet
that demand.
3. To meet unique program requirements.
Portables, or relocatables, currently in use will be evaluated resulting in some
being improved and some replaced. Quality concerns will be among those
addressed by the next Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee in review of
capital facilities needs for the next bond issue.
The Plan projects that the District will use relocatables to accommodate interim
housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of relocatables, their
impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the
interrelationship between relocatables, emerging technologies and educational
restructuring will continue to be be examined.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April. 1999 Page 19
V I I Projected Six -Year Classroom Capacities
As stated in Section I V, the program capacity study was updated for changes in
special programs as well class size reduction in Grades K - 3. As shown in the
Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3 on Page 13, the program capacity is
also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts. (Sse Tables 5 6 5 A4 3-C
on pages 21-24)
The first school day of October is set by OSPI as the enrollment count date for
the year. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) student enrollment for October 1, 1998
was 24,875.90 with kindergarten students counted at .5 and excluding Early
Childhood Education students (ECE - preschool special education) and
College -only Running Start FTEs. (See Tables 5 d 5 A -&C on pages 21-24)
A headcount of all students enrolled on October 1, 1998 totals 26,074 which
continues to rank Kent School District as the fourth largest district in the state of
Washington.
Based on the enrollment forecasts, current inventory and capacity, current
standard of service, relocatable capacity, and future planned classroom space,
the District anticipates having sufficient capacity to house students over the next
six years. (See Table 5 and Tables 5 A -B -C on Pages 21 - 24)
This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There
will be significant need for new schools to accommodate growth within the
District. Some schools, by design, may be opened with relocatables on site.
Boundary changes, movement of relocatables, zoning changes, market
conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing
overcrowding and underutilization of facilities in different parts of the District.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April. 1999 Page 20
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
TOTAL DISTRICT
Permanent Program Cacity'
pa24,093 24,093 24,800 25,285 25,285 25,825 27,430
New Permanent Construction '
Elementary # 27a 222
Kent Elementary replacement - Net Capacity Gain
Emerald Park Elementary # 29 485
Elementary # 30 485
Elementary # 31 (Unfunded)4 540
Elementary # 32 (Unfunded)4 540
Junior High # 8 (Unfunded)4 1,065
Permanent Program Capacdy Subtotal 24,093 24,800 25,285 25,285 25,825 27,430 27,430
Interim Relocatable Ca acit
Elementary Relocatable Capacdy Required 1,350 450 250 575 200 175
Junior High Relomiable CaWcdy Required 232 435 812 116
Senior High Rek=table Capacity Required 186 465 651
Total Relocatable Capacity Required 3 1,350 450 482 1,010 1,198 465 942
TOTAL CAPACITY' 1 25,443 1 25,250 1 25,767 1 26,295 1 27,023 1 27,895 1 28,372
2
TOTAL FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 24,920 24,781 25,495 26,206 26,966 27,672 28,329
DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 1 523 469 272 89 57 223 43
' Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity.
2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment (ie. ECE Preschool Handicapped & 12 day Kindergarten student = .5).
3 1998-99 total classroom relocatable capacity is 1,901.
° New facility needs are currently being reviewed by the Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 April, 1999 Page 21
SCHOOL YEAR
1998-99
1999-2000
1 2000.2001
1 2oot-2002
1 2002-2003
1 2003-2004
2004-200S
Actual
P R O J E C T
E D
Permanent Program Cacity'
pa24,093 24,093 24,800 25,285 25,285 25,825 27,430
New Permanent Construction '
Elementary # 27a 222
Kent Elementary replacement - Net Capacity Gain
Emerald Park Elementary # 29 485
Elementary # 30 485
Elementary # 31 (Unfunded)4 540
Elementary # 32 (Unfunded)4 540
Junior High # 8 (Unfunded)4 1,065
Permanent Program Capacdy Subtotal 24,093 24,800 25,285 25,285 25,825 27,430 27,430
Interim Relocatable Ca acit
Elementary Relocatable Capacdy Required 1,350 450 250 575 200 175
Junior High Relomiable CaWcdy Required 232 435 812 116
Senior High Rek=table Capacity Required 186 465 651
Total Relocatable Capacity Required 3 1,350 450 482 1,010 1,198 465 942
TOTAL CAPACITY' 1 25,443 1 25,250 1 25,767 1 26,295 1 27,023 1 27,895 1 28,372
2
TOTAL FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 24,920 24,781 25,495 26,206 26,966 27,672 28,329
DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 1 523 469 272 89 57 223 43
' Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity.
2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment (ie. ECE Preschool Handicapped & 12 day Kindergarten student = .5).
3 1998-99 total classroom relocatable capacity is 1,901.
° New facility needs are currently being reviewed by the Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 April, 1999 Page 21
i
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
ELEMENTARY
[ElonentaryPermanent Program Capsc 11,788 12,198 12,905 13,390 13,390 13,930 14,470
Kent Learning Canter - Special Program 410
New Permanent Elementary Construction
Kent Elementary # 27a 222 (NM C wav)
Repime Kant Ekwwntary 456 - rM - rn Net Capacity
Emerald Park Elementary (# 29) 485
Elementary # 30 485
Elementary # 31 (Unfunded)4 540
Elementary # 32 (Unfunded)4 540
Subtotal 1Z,196 1Z,9U5 13,390 13,JWU 13,y3U 14,410 14,410
lRelocatable Capacity Required 2 1,350 450 250 575 2d0
175
TOTAL CAPACITY 2 13,548 13,355 13,640 13,965 14,130 14,470 14,645
FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 3 1 13,534 13,340 13,634 13,958 14,105 14,366 14,644
SURPLUS(DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 14 15 6 7 25 104 1
1 Kent Leaning Center is a special program at Grandview School serving students in Grades 2 through 12.
The school was designed and is currently configured as an elementary school.
2 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity.
FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or Projection (ECE & Kindergarten = .5)
4 New facility needs are currently being reviewed by the Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee.
Kent School Cistnct Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table PJ A
Aonl 1999 nage 22
SCHOOL YEAR
1998-99
1999.2oao
1 2oos-2ool
1 2001-2002
1 =-=
I 2o03.2004
1 2004-2 os
Actual
P R O J E C T
E 0
[ElonentaryPermanent Program Capsc 11,788 12,198 12,905 13,390 13,390 13,930 14,470
Kent Learning Canter - Special Program 410
New Permanent Elementary Construction
Kent Elementary # 27a 222 (NM C wav)
Repime Kant Ekwwntary 456 - rM - rn Net Capacity
Emerald Park Elementary (# 29) 485
Elementary # 30 485
Elementary # 31 (Unfunded)4 540
Elementary # 32 (Unfunded)4 540
Subtotal 1Z,196 1Z,9U5 13,390 13,JWU 13,y3U 14,410 14,410
lRelocatable Capacity Required 2 1,350 450 250 575 2d0
175
TOTAL CAPACITY 2 13,548 13,355 13,640 13,965 14,130 14,470 14,645
FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 3 1 13,534 13,340 13,634 13,958 14,105 14,366 14,644
SURPLUS(DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 14 15 6 7 25 104 1
1 Kent Leaning Center is a special program at Grandview School serving students in Grades 2 through 12.
The school was designed and is currently configured as an elementary school.
2 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity.
FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or Projection (ECE & Kindergarten = .5)
4 New facility needs are currently being reviewed by the Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee.
Kent School Cistnct Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table PJ A
Aonl 1999 nage 22
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
JUNIOR HIGH
[junior HI9h Permanent Program Capscdy 6,123 6,123 6,123 6,123 6,123 6,123 7,188
New Perrmnent Junior High Construction
Junior High # 8 (Unfunded)3 1,065
Subtotal 6,123 6,123 6,123 6,123 6,123 7,188 7,188
[Relocatable Capacity Required' 232 435 812 116
TOTAL CAPACITY' 1 6,123 6,123 6,355 6,558 6,935 7,188 7,304
FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION T5,958 6,008 6,326 6,557 6,923 7,096 7,292
SURPLUS DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 165 115 29 1 12 92 12
' Capacity numbers are based on standard of service for program capacity.
2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment / Projection
Approximately 10 Junior High students are served part of the day at high schools for advanced placement.
3 New facility needs are currently being reviewed by the Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B
Apnl, 1999 Page 23
SCHOOL YEAR
1998-99
1499-2000
1 2000.200
2001-2002
1 2002-2003
1 2003-2004
1 2004-2005
Actual
P R O J E C T
E D
[junior HI9h Permanent Program Capscdy 6,123 6,123 6,123 6,123 6,123 6,123 7,188
New Perrmnent Junior High Construction
Junior High # 8 (Unfunded)3 1,065
Subtotal 6,123 6,123 6,123 6,123 6,123 7,188 7,188
[Relocatable Capacity Required' 232 435 812 116
TOTAL CAPACITY' 1 6,123 6,123 6,355 6,558 6,935 7,188 7,304
FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION T5,958 6,008 6,326 6,557 6,923 7,096 7,292
SURPLUS DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 165 115 29 1 12 92 12
' Capacity numbers are based on standard of service for program capacity.
2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment / Projection
Approximately 10 Junior High students are served part of the day at high schools for advanced placement.
3 New facility needs are currently being reviewed by the Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B
Apnl, 1999 Page 23
r
i
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
SENIOR HIGH
Senior Ho Permanent Program Capaerty 5,772 5,772 5,772 5,772 5,772 5,772 5,772
New Permanent Senior High Construction
Subtotal 5,772 0,IIZ S,IIZ S,IIZ S,IIZ S,IIZ 5,11Z
Relocatable Capacity Required' 186 465 651
TOTAL CAPACITY 1 5.772 5.772 5.772 5.772 5.958 6.237 6.423
FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 2 5,428 5,433 5,535 5,691 5,938 6,210 6,393
SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 344 339 237 81 20 27 30
Capacity numbers are based on standard of service for program capacity.
2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment, excluding full time Running Start students.
Approximately 10 Junior High students are served part of the day at high schools for advanced placement.
New facility needs are currently being reviewed by the Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee.
Kent School District Sic -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C April, 1999 Page 24
SCHOOL YEAR
1998-99
1999-2000
1 2000-2001
1 2001-2002
1 2002-200
2007-2004
1 2004-20M
Actual
P R O J E C T
E D
Senior Ho Permanent Program Capaerty 5,772 5,772 5,772 5,772 5,772 5,772 5,772
New Permanent Senior High Construction
Subtotal 5,772 0,IIZ S,IIZ S,IIZ S,IIZ S,IIZ 5,11Z
Relocatable Capacity Required' 186 465 651
TOTAL CAPACITY 1 5.772 5.772 5.772 5.772 5.958 6.237 6.423
FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 2 5,428 5,433 5,535 5,691 5,938 6,210 6,393
SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 344 339 237 81 20 27 30
Capacity numbers are based on standard of service for program capacity.
2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment, excluding full time Running Start students.
Approximately 10 Junior High students are served part of the day at high schools for advanced placement.
New facility needs are currently being reviewed by the Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee.
Kent School District Sic -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C April, 1999 Page 24
I
V I I I Finance Plan
The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District
plans to finance improvements for the years 1999 - 2000 through 2004 - 2005.
The financing components include secured and unsecured funding. The plan is
based on voter approval of future bond issues, collection of impact fees under
the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to
State Environmental Policy Act.
Kent Elementary # 27a, replacement for the existing Kent Elementary School, is
the last school for which the District expects to receive state matching funds
under the current state funding formula.
For the Six -Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates
from Kent School District Facilities Department.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 1999 Page 25
f
0
M
C
tn
8
N
rn
N
LL
LL
LL
D
D
D
LL
•
N
o
H
w
E
w
U
�
A
J
J
U
o
s .LL
N .,
M
MOb
N
-
•
U.
W=
8
co
tL
A
v
r Y
ri
N
y�
8
A
cm
2
�i
ck
Y
O
a
U
w
ri r�
m
rn
Z
Q
d
r
=
(A
h.
QI
N
0
C%it0
a
c
d
E
g`
c
cr
d
E
d
c
2
o
wE
tu
a
w6s
j
w
w
'
~
yw
� •'•r
.
�
e
r
o
g.x
WC
C
0QQ
aS
p
Nn
NItZ
Q
N "
en
vi
+•'
J
pp
u}
O
W
'
N
G o w.
w+
U
�PRJCSY
Q
N
N
y
✓i� z
Z
N
x
O
O
�
N
u9
N
N
f
0
M
C
tn
8
N
rn
N
LL
LL
LL
D
D
D
LL
•
N
o
H
w
E
w
U
�
A
J
J
U
o
U
v
-
O
U.
W=
cn
co
tL
A
it
a
A
2
�i
a
a
U
w
m
rn
Z
Q
d
=
(A
Z.
0
a
c
d
E
g`
c
cr
d
E
d
c
2
o
wE
tu
a
E
j
w
w
'
~
v
,
�
e
Z$
w
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
Student Generation Factors - Single Family
Elementary
0.515
Junior High
0.197
Senior High
0.180
Total
0.892
Projected Student Capacity per Facility
Elementary 540
Junior High 1,065
Senior High 1,650
Required Site Acreage per Facility
Elementary (required)
Junior High (required)
Senior High (required)
11
21
27
New Facility Construction Cost / Average •
Elementary $8,514,297
Junior High $19,115,525
Senior High SO
See average calculations on Pg. 27a
Temporary Facility Square Footage
Elementary
84,196
Junior High
24,360
Senior High
20,840
Total 4%
129,396
Permanent Facility Square Footage
Elementary
1.282,101
Junior High
738,840
Senior High
830,629
Total 96%
2,851,570
Total Facilities Square Footage
Elementary
1,366,297
Junior High
763,200
Senior High
851,469
Total
2,980,966
Developer Provided Sites / Facilities
Value 0
Dwelling Units 0
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan
Student Generation Factors - Multi -Family
Elementary
0.279
Junior High
0.086
Senior High
0.063
Total
0.428
SPI Square Footage per Student
Elementary 80
Junior High 113.33
Senior High 120
Average Site Cost / Acre
Elementary $0
Junior High $0
Senior High $0
Temporary Facility Capacity 81 Cost
Elementary 25 $57,000
Junior High 29 $57,000
Senior High @ 31 $57,000
t
State Match Credit
Current State Match Percentage 0.00%
Previous State Match 55.64%
Boeckh Index Factor
Current Boeckh Index $99.83
District Average Assessed Value
Single Family Residence $162,224
District Average Assessed Value
Multi -Family Residence $47,652
District Debt Service Tax Rate
Current / $1000 Rate S2.97
General Obligation Bond Interest Rate
Current Bond Buyer Index 5.11%
April, 1999 Page 27
For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on the average costs
of the last four elementary schools and the next elementary school, and the
average costs of the last two junior high schools and the next junior high school.
Elementary Schools
Cost
Average
Sawyer Woods
$6,463,054
Meadow Ride
$6,996,325
Glenrid a
$8,032,895
Kent Elements #27a
$10,122,095
Emerald Park #29
$10,957,114
Average Cost of
5 elementary schools
$8,514,297
Junior High Schools
Cost
Average
Cedar Heights
$14,488,028
Northwood
$17,100,049
Junior High #8
$25,758,498
Average Cost of
3 junior high schools
$19,115,525
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 1999 Page 27a
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence
Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor
Tax Credit per Single Family Residence
Average Residential Assessed Value $162,224
Current Debt Service Tax Rate 52.97
Bond Buyer Index Interest Rate 5.11%
Discount Period (10 Years) 10 TC —> $3,700.58
Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value I Dwelling UnAS
0 0 FC 0
Fee Recap
A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence
Required Site Acreage I
Average Site Cost/Acre I
Facility Cawcin I
Sludene Factor
$7569
A 1 (Elementary)
11
s0
S40
0.515
$000
A 2 (Junior High)
21
s0
1,065
0.197
$0.00
A 3 (Senior High)
27
$0
1,650
0.180
$0.00
A
$0.00
Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence
Formula: ((Facility
Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (PermanentlTotal Square Footage Ratio)
Conwnietlon Coat
Facility Capwtity
Sludent Fades I
Footage Rata
B 1 (Elementary)
58,514,297
540
0.515
0.96
$7,795.31
B 2 (Junior High)
$19,115,525
1,065
0.197
0.96
$3,394.49
B 3 (Senor High)
$0
1,650
0.180
0.96
$0.00
0.892
B
$11.189.80
Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence
Formula: ((Facdlty
Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio)
Facility Coat
Facility Capacity
SludeM Factor
r Footage Rata
C 1 (Elementary)
$57,000
25
0.515
0.04
546.97
C 2 (Junior High)
$57,000
29
0.197
0.04
$15.49
C 3 (Senior High)
$57,000
31
0.180
0.04
513.24
0.892
C —>
575.69
State Match Credit per Single Family Residence
Formula: Boeckh Index x SPI Square Footage x District Match % x Student Factor
aoackh Index
SPI Fc l ge
Ch trill hlatch %
Student Factor
D 1 (Elemenfary)
599.83
80
0
0.515
$0.00
0 2 (Junior High)
599.83
113.33
0
0.197
$0.00
0 3 (Senior High)
$99.83
120
0
0.180
$0.00
D --
$0.00
Tax Credit per Single Family Residence
Average Residential Assessed Value $162,224
Current Debt Service Tax Rate 52.97
Bond Buyer Index Interest Rate 5.11%
Discount Period (10 Years) 10 TC —> $3,700.58
Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value I Dwelling UnAS
0 0 FC 0
Fee Recap
A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence
$0.00
B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence
$11,189.80
C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence
$7569
Subtotal
$11,265.49
D = State Match Credit per Residence
$0.00
TC = Tax Credit per Residence
53.700 58
Subtotal
- $3.700.58
Total Unfunded Need $7.564.92
Developer Fee Obligation $3.782.46
FC = Facility Credit Cif applicable) 0
Net Fee Obligation per Single Family Residence $3.782.46
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 1999 Page 28
t
Appendix A: Calculations of Capacities for Elementary Schools
Appendix B: Calculations of Capacities for Junior High Schools
Appendix C: Calculations of Capacities for Senior High Schools
Appendix D: Use of Relocatables
Appendix E: Student Generation Factor Survey
Appendix F: Summary of Changes to 1998 Capital Facilities Plan
Kent School Oistnct Six -Year Capdal Facilities Plan April, 1999
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENCE
Site Acquisition Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit
Formula. ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor
Temporary Facility Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit
Required Silo Acreage
I Average Sue CostrAcre I
Facility Capec:ty I
Sludent Facto )
Facility Cost Facility Capaedy
A 1
(Elementary)
11
so
540
0.279
$0.00
A 2
(Junior High)
21
so
1,065
0.086
$0.00
A 3
(Senior High)
27
s0
1,650
0.063
$0.00
Formula: Boeckh Index x SPI Square Footage x District Match % x Student Factor
A
$0.00
Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit
D 1 (Elementary) $99.83 80
0
Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent / Total Square Footage Ratio)
$0.00
0 2 (Junior High) $99.83 113.33
0
Constrtieilon Cost
Facility Capacity
Student Factor
Footage Rata
0.063
B 1
(Elementary)
$8,514,297
540
0.279
0.96
$4,223.09
B 2
(Junior High)
$19,115,525
1,065
0.086
0.96
$1,481.86
B 3
(Senior High)
$0
1,650
0.063
0.96
$0.00
0.428
B —>
$5,704.95
Temporary Facility Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit
Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio)
Facility Cost Facility Capaedy
Student Factor I
Footage Rata
C 1 (Elementary) $57,000 25
0.279
0.04
$25.44
C 2 (Junior High) 557,000 29
0.086
0.04
$6.76
C 3 (Senior High) $57,000 31
0.063
0.04
$4.63
0.428
C —>
S36.84
State Match Credit per Multifamily Residence Unit
Formula: Boeckh Index x SPI Square Footage x District Match % x Student Factor
8oeekh Index SPI Footage
oisinct Match %
Student Feeto
D 1 (Elementary) $99.83 80
0
0.279
$0.00
0 2 (Junior High) $99.83 113.33
0
0.086'
$0.00
D 3 (Senior High) 599.83 120
0
0.063
$0.00
D --->
$0.00
Tax Credit per Multi -Family Residence Unit
Average Residential Assessed Value
Current Debt Service Tax Rate
Bond Buyer Index Annual Interest Rate
Discount Period (10 Years)
$47,652
52.97
5.11%
10 TC —>
Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value I Dwelling Units
0 0
Fee Recap
A = Site Acquisition per Multi -Family Unit
B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit
C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit
Subtotal
D = State Match Credit per MF Unit
` TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit
Subtotal
Total Unfunded Need
Developer Fee Obligation
FC = Facility Credit (if applicable)
$0.00
S5.70495
S3684
$5,741.79
$0.00
$1,082.82
$1,082.82
Net Fee Obligation per Multi -Family Residence Unit
54,658.97
FC —>
$2,329.49
0
52.329 49
$1,082.82
0
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 1999 Page 29
om
O
r
7S N N N N N a ? � � 2 � � � � • • o �% �% r i i A o e i
• e v n r r r •
3 = � g � � o • it S � n v 3 • 3 � 'r, ,'. � � � � w S � �
_ NCR
s �
O
40 100
A " •
Sirit3
r N N v 2 ;7C 2 A A m A A A A
;a y o m A m r .m s rQ+ 0< A
V a N V V O N N 1p V V N 0 O V 0 0 O O Ol V V l0 m V O
a I O O N N O lNJ1 O lVll N N O O O N iNl1 O O O O O N N N N N O
N
Co I w w Y N N N N N a r N a N Y w N N a N w w a w N N w N
I a0 0 `b' o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o � o rl0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0
a a a a dlapp N N a p a a Nl a s yNy a aNN a a a _a a a a a a
O V V N V tp V V O P Y N v N 0 a V 0 V N 0 VI N O V N
IIC I O N N a 0 O N r W a N r N O r N O r N a s N N r r a r
IY I O r O w O O O N O N w O N N r U W N O O O lr r N O O O
19 I O N O N O O O g O N N O O O U N N O O O O N N N O O O
rr
:elm Raes
IN I V N AT 10.1 t0 v O U� 10 t0 0 t.l O 4/ O loll Oa Q1 N O 17 10 DI O lJi
A
D
M
0,
=i R
< 2
T
m
0
7
CL
m
D
^Q
0
O
C
Z
4
m
z
M
O
r
r
m
z
X
D
C3
0
^
l J
8
L
, I
..v.
7C
7C
7C
7C
N
2
;
x
A
—)
N
x
•
j
7
3
a•
s
=
Y
3
a
D
Z
3
3
3
S
m
3
d
1
O
^
S
N
b
N
M
O
_
y°
T
S
a
z
S
a
v
O
K
A
S
_
=
c
Q
0
J
r0
r
N
qk
m
M
O
r
y
G
O r
AN m oe iu
O
v
C + Q1 Ol
o
R
3
d
v
i
x
O
�
j
J
N
10
co
a
p
M
rr
r
m
W
N
W
t!1
N
N
L)
r
p
9
r
T
m
n
G
C
3
4
.< D
N
•
O
N
O
W
• Y
�
QW
•
N
y
O
O
O
O
N .'•
4
rS
tQ
iC Ci i`
7
O
t
3
T
V
„O.
.
�
� m
�
•
`
Z
a
a
o
to
M
a
m
o
o
m
V
ca
Z n
y
� T
n p
N
N
fi J
{�1
W
�
r
j
b
.00
O
N
°+
�
N
W
N
O
O
O
W
N
X
e�
O r
P
W
N
n i
%
�
o
O��
x^
b T
tp
OI
t�pp
b
v
N
w
m
10
m
O
V
S
m
3
N
u
{D
a
b
v
v
0
+
3
rn
h r Z
Y
nO
w
T
D
t
►
W
N
O
O
r 4
$
a
O
+
N'
a
N
+
a
m
o•
3
Z
f
g
m
O
N
n
M
-n
O
O
m
O
N
+
^
m
3
33a
�
CL
a
u
o
i
u
D
0
C
m
m
N
r
r
r7
m
07
V
ID
mrn
Z
-1
7
Z
O
U
r
r
2.
_
UI
v
a
u
u
1L
p'
a
01
o
_r
CD
N
O
?
�
z
D
T
a
m
_z
IX
V
CL
A
qc
0
61
H
N
to
y
d
3
N
H
3
d
3
r^
N
N
3
d
on,
O
C
-,
03
Q
N
d
m
m
c
O
0
A
m
Q
<D
C
(A
A
t0
!'f
v
O
O
N
ss�
tl
o
e
M
tipp
t0
M
o
N
N
O
O
p
N
,
C
O
D
W
O
O
m
N
e
o
e
2
Q
Iz
• w
o
o
a
�
A
e
y
s
�
.Q
c
w
o o c (A
.s
aIQ
N
O
N
UNf
O
A
e
n
y
s
0
�
o
Q
0
m
M
N
O
0
O
a
N
U
N
A y
e
v c
CL
3
e
v
0
N
�
p
�
N
y
�
u
A y
m
e
o
=
�p
OZ
N O O iJl
v
Lei
O
O
O N
e
n
O
N
a
R
e
Z
0
Q
Z
11
n
N
to
N
Ot
..•
OI
Ln
A
e
(f
N
c
O
m
z
c _q
Cl) N
m n
o =
-� 0
m r0
r v
0
n cn
"i M
Cr% O
A
J
D
M
M
M
z
v
_ m
CL
e N a aW
W P N O B
�poSScf c�cn.'cZ�namcDnmg3rCO1_G?T00
M
°O34 tor-
m
cM3 o3.0
C 0 m Nn o QQ- -T
< oMA o
T
O m' 7 7 y ii y N CL --n
3
=
m m y N Q
my a 3 <
n N
a
7 7 O O
o a y 3
m �
d �
y
Pi 7 0
<O 0 b ''� • o• a -• m
m y
N �
0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o a
o m
y
f0 S O b N i S S O S P Jvi. 8 0 H
W
J
m W O N P N O co b OPI A N r s
N
� v 40 �;, N W m�Io a v uNi m a
M 3
m
N P b V b P W N v tN0 N P O b N~
V y
J _
m P N 0 Vfz O O o 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o
A -�
N bp• W N Np N N a 01 y♦a r cWN� ♦ pl O_
C, N OI b S S v OWI V 0 a N OI P m N
C
CL
m
o 0 o o o 0 o o 0 0 0 0 o o m
N N N N {.I N A. pib1 N app N Ip
a O W ♦ a O W co m 0 W 3 m
7
m
0)
C
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
r V Oi N m
A
O
Epos Qpas o 0 o 1p0p pp0� Opo1 o PO (off Qpao o o
La {J W V {WA N W W V N W OI O 0. N N
La
c
CL C
mI
or
=i
m
A
O (
N
c -
2
m
m
O1 ty� b P d N P { V • pN V W pp�� + V V
'� O V 01 S♦ N N "' O b O
0,
�
N v v P a O V O
O
-i-icncnCncn =rr=MMM000D
0
y 0 1 O
3 m, m 7 H m ? m m
M 89
3 mM 07 02.°3 2 "m ;am
a m C A Pe Gi m x CL 7 a V
S Ito
T_
d O
G. 7C d a !A m y = O 00
�, m m 0 (n 00 o m m aa
to
m x m go 9°(n o'm W W`S
o'
m
A o r m O
r ami — �+
o
$ > CL m
°o O r°. 0 m
CD
CD
O S c N m O
o $ O CL 3 is a
o
m o CL y
_ `�
3
A ..
Q
fD
7
H
M
m
y
T
AM 0 S y y rA- p n 0 Arn
A�<�< rn A r m� � f5$
o
o
H
Q
e
ca
i►
b y N +O 0 OI P iPd P O �� , S N� a W
Ce "'
7 O
�
r O 4 a
�+
�O W N a N N CC OO!! co W
d
N
♦
N
N
r v b O N O N b V W OI V W ID O O
m
N
N W N W r 01 r (T N N r N N N N N N o
b r 01 N r W r K r ♦ OI N N+ P N m P b
OI
W
b r a W N N+ N P r N N a P+
a S O O W P Ol V O N V b N �1 ♦ N N
(n
0 r— O O O+ O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r O r cJ O
—I
Co
W P �I o O b O
s O N V W_ cm N O� b � Op W Pp a
O_
10
yV §
1
01 N r v a+ u a fD O fJ 1D N N N+ 0+ (�1 ;s
N 9
d
N
C
CL
M
0
0 0 0 0 a
0� 0 0 0 0
0� , o
0� 0 0
0� 0 0 0
01 0
T_
R.
J
p { ( ( (J0� Q (
T N 01
b V SI j V O OI pa V a N a pNNp {vll s {Ja�pp V
S
m
U/
N
N V v W V O O V b P
O N ♦ S N N b b b
3
7
m
d
C.
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
0
J
V
N W r O + N + N N IJ N N W IN
pI {p lJ1 r 8 O 10 b 10 N W 40 N 01 N 0 N W O N
G
C-
�
OI V Da OI IO O +
G I0 U1 a r q N P W N W W
A
O
o O o 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 O
J
-. M W U r N r N N+ N ♦ r r r N+ r N N r N
Y O) N 111 a V N (JI P
IO Q
O W NI QI Oa V W N
Cn
c
CL C
mI
or
=i
m
A
O (
N
c -
2
m
8
Appendix F - Summary of Changes to April 1998 Capital Facilities Plan
The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in
effect since 1993. The primary changes from the April 1998 Plan are summarized here.
Kent Elementary #27a has completed construction and Emerald Park Elementary #29
is under construction with opening scheduled for January and September, 1999
respectively. Elementary 30 will start construction soon. Citizens' Facilities Planning
Committee is reviewing future facility needs and is expected to make a
recommendation to the Board in Fall of 1999.
Changes to capacity reflect some reduction in class size for grades K - 3 as well as
annual program changes. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect
purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement of portables between facilities
Permanent facility costs and site cost per acre have been adjusted to reflect averages
of costs for schools built most recently. The district expects to receive no state
matching funds for schools in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually.
Student enrollment forecast is updated annually.
The student generation factor survey was updated to reflect developments added or
deleted and changes in student yield. Changes reflect no adjustment for occupancy
and exclusion of studio apartments per agreement with members of the development
community. Survey data is included as Appendix E.
Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors include:
ITEM
Gradafrype IFROM I TO I Comments
Student Generation Factor
Elem
0.512
0.515
Updated in 1999 Plan
Single Family (SF)
.Jr
0.188
0.197
Sr
0.140
0.180
Total
0.840
0.892
Student Generation Factor
Elem
0.235
0.279
Updated in 1999 Plan
Multi -Family (MF)
Jr
0.080
0.086
Sr
0.062
0.063
Total
0.377
0.428
State Match
55.64%
--0%
Per SPI
Boeckh Index (Cost per square foot)
$9723
$99.83
Per SPI
Average Assessed Valuation
SF
$149,635
$162.224
Per Puget Sound ESD
AV - Average of Condominiums 8 Apts.
MF
548,992
$47.652
Per Puget Sound ESD
Debt Service Tax Rate
$2.97
$2.97
Per )Ong County Assessor
General Obligation Bond Interest Rate
5.19%
5.11%
Market Rate
Impact Fee - Single Family
SF
$3.744
63,782
Impact Fee - Multi -Family
MF
$1,888
$2.329
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan APPENDIX F
Acrd, 1999 Page 34
`
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
1998/99
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
BOARD OF EDUCATION
Linda Hendrickson
Holly Isaman
Joel Marks
Ann Murphy
Jim Storvick
SUPERINTENDENT
Thomas J. Vander Ark
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLA:ti
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................ i
INTRODUCTION.................................................. ii -iv
SECTION I THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Introduction............................................................. I-1
Inventory of Educational Facilities ............................. I-2
Inventory of Non -Instructional Facilities .................... I-3
Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities .......................... I-4
Needs Forecast - New Facilities .............................. I-5
Six Year Finance Plan .............................................. I-6
SECTION II MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
Introduction.............................................................
H-1
Map - Elementary Boundaries ....................
H-2
Map - Junior High Boundaries ....................
I1-3
Map - Senior High Boundaries ...................
II -4
SECTION III SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
Introduction.............................................................
III -1
Building Capacities ...................................................
III -2
Portable Locations ...................................................
III -4
Student Forecast......................................................
III -6
Capacity Summaries .................................................
III -8
King County Impact Fee Calculations .......................
III -13
SECTION IV SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 1997/98 PLAN IV -1
FEDERAL WAY PliBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
INTRODUCTION
In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act
(SHB 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances
of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective
December 21, 1995 as amended, and the City of Kent Ordinance No. 3260 effective
March 1996, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 1997/98 Capital Facilities Plan
as of April 1999
This Plan has been adopted by King County, the City of Kent and the City of Federal
Way and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference.
This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of
each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Auburn and City of Des Moines have not adopted
a school impact fee ordinance.
The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas
within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning
Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area
Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the
Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries.
King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to
meet the region's need for housing, jobs, services, culture and recreation. This Plan's
estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption.
This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which
requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not
intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may
prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies. Additional plans will be consistent
with the six year Capital Facilities Plan. At this time, Federal Way Public Schools is
evaluating the need for and possible timing of future bonds.
FEDERAL. WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAIN
INTRODUCTION (continued)
In October of 1997 the District convened a Study and Survey Committee. The Committee
was made up of patrons, parents, professional consultants, school staff and central
administration staff. The charge of the Committee was divided into four focus areas on a
continuum, which lead to recommendations to the Board of Education. The four focus
committees were:
1. Educational Plan Committee
2. Special Education Committee
3. Classroom Standards and Facility Use Committee
4. Future Alternative Committee
Two recommendations were sent forward to the Board of Education from this committee.
The first recommendation was to move to a Pre K-5 elementary, 6-8 middle school, and 9-12
high school grade configuration beginning in the fall of 2002 or as additional high school
space allows. The Board of Education approved this recommendation at the October 12,
1998 regular Board Meeting. This grade configuration is believed to be more responsive to
student needs. It will allow for smaller elementary enrollments with room for lower primary
class sizes. The middle school allows two -yeas preparation for the WA State 7`t' grade test,
matches the Federal Way Public Schools 8`� grade gateway test, and matches most western
Washington districts. Middle schools are also thought to be a better way to address the
needs of adolescence in a period of transition from elementary to school to high school. The
four-year high school plan combines the 9-12 graduation credit system, allows two-year
preparation from the 10'h grade test, and physically places the high school students together.
The second recommendation brought forward from the committee to the Board of Education
was a bond proposal. Federal Way Public Schools must meet the needs of a growing student
and community population. The District must be flexible with building, programs and
staffing to meet the needs of the 215` Century, while being financially responsible and
sensitive to the current tax rates. A flexible, cost effective and educationally beneficial
approach that integrates academics and high tech/high skill preparation is needed. By
extending the existing debt and creatively using new and existing facilities, the District can
meet these complex needs with no increase in local tax rates.
The bond proposal of $83 million was arrived at after receiving input from parents, staff and
the community. Member of the Citizens for Federal Way Schools and senionstaff members
met with school staff and PTSA groups. This process concluded with two daylong meetings
among a group of faculty members. Based upon information the District received, it became
apparent that people wanted a comprehensive high school ($44 million); a middle school
($17 million); expansion and improvement of existing schools ($9 million); replace of
Truman High School
iv
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
($6 million) and other general improvements ($7 million). Additional planned improvements
included in the bond proposal are: parking and pedestrian safety, playgrounds and sports
fields, new classroom start-up and music equipment, information systems and networks and
emergency communications.
The Board of Education unanimously approved this bond recommendation at the February 8,
1999 regular Board Meeting. This proposal will be submitted for voter approval on May
18, 1999.
Federal Way Public Schools opened the Internet Academy in the 1996/97 school year. This
program currently serves approximately 615 students, 375 are full time students. Internet
Academy has grown from about 60 students to the current 615 in less than two years. The
forecast for growth in this program is to serve approximately 1400 full time students by the
year 2004.
Internet Academy is currently operating out of leased space consisting of administrative areas
and a computer lab area. Additionally, some lab sections are scheduled in the current high
school facilities during non -school hours. There is an anticipated need of approximately
2000 square feet of additional space over the next two years. This capacity is not included in
the analysis of instructional spaces. The facility needs are unique to a program of "distance
learners".
The Marketing Academy is also operating out of leased space. This program serves
approximately 60 students. Capacity needs for Marketing Academy have not been addressed
in the analysis of instructional space.
Federal Way Public Academy will open in the 1999/00 school year in six portables on the
Illahee Junior High site. This school will serve 120 seventh and eight grade students.
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAIN
SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to
determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community.
1. This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and
expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. This is followed by
a Financial Plan which shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and
update modernization needs listed.
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
36001 151 Ave S
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
98003
Illahee
36001 1st Avenue S
Adelaide
1635 SW 304th Street
Federal Way
98023
Brigadoon
3601 SW 336th Street
Federal Way
98023
Camelot
4041 S 298th Street
Auburn
98001
Enterprise
35101 5th Avenue SW
Federal Way
98023
Green Gables
32607 47th Avenue SW
Federal Way
98023
Lake Dolloff
4200 S 308th Street
Auburn
98001
Lake Grove
303 SW 308th Street
Federal Way
98023
Lakeland
35675 32nd Avenue S
Auburn
98001
Mark Twain
2450 S Star Lake Road
Federal Way
98003
Meredith Hill
5830 S 300th Street
Auburn
98001
Mirror Lake
625 S 314th Street
Federal Way
98003
Nautilus
1000 S 289th Street
Federal Way
98003
Olympic View
2626 SW 327th Street
Federal Way
98023
Panther Lake
34424 1st Avenue S
Federal Way
98003
Rainier View
3015 S 368th Street
Federal Way
98003
Sherwood Forest
34600 12th Avenue SW
Federal Way
98023
Silver Lake
1310 SW 325th Place
Federal Way
98023
Star Lake '
4014 S 270th Street
Kent
98032
Sunnycrest
24629 42nd Avenue S
Kent
98032
Twin Lakes
4400 SW 320th Street
Federal Way
98023
Valhalla
27847 42nd Avenue S
Auburn
98001
Wildwood
2405 S 300th Street
Federal Way
98003
Woodmont
26454 16th Avenue S.
Des Moines
98198
JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
Federal Way Public Academy 1999"
36001 151 Ave S
Federal Way
98003
Illahee
36001 1st Avenue S
Federal Way
98003
Kilo
4400 S 308th Street
Auburn
98001
Lakota
1415 SW 314th Street
Federal Way
98023
Sacajawea
1101 S Dash Point Road
Federal Way
98003
Saghalie
33914 19th Avenue SW
Federal Way
98023
Totem
26630 40th Avenue S
Kent
98032
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
Decatur
2800 SW 320th Street
Federal Way
98023
Federal Way
30611 16th Avenue S
Federal Way
98003
Thomas Jefferson
4248 S 288th Street
Auburn
98001
ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS
Merit School
31455 28th Ave S
Federal Way
98003
Harry S Truman High School
31455 28th Ave S
Federal Way
98003
LEASED SPACE
Internet Academy
32020 1S1 Ave S
Federal Way
98003
Marketing Academy
1928 S Sea Tac Mall
Federal Way
98003
I-2
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLA.`
CURRENT INVENTORY NON -INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES
Developed Property.
Administrative Building
MOT Site
Central Kitchen
Federal Way Memorial Field
Leased Space
Community Resource Center
Security Offices
Undeveloped Property
31405 18th Avenue S Federal Way 98003
1066 S 320th Street Federal Way 98003
1344 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003
1300 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003
1928 S Sea Tac Mall Federal Way 98003
30819 14'h Ave S Federal Way 98003
Site # Location
9' 27`h Avenue SW & Dash Point Road
23 SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW
35 S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S
40 E of 10th Avenue SW Between SW 334th & SW 335th Streets
63 E of 47th Avenue SW & SW 314th Place
71 S 344th Street & 46th Avenue S
72 36600 block of Pacific Highway S
84 3737 S 360th Street
96 S 308th Street & 14th Avenue S
Notes:
Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements.
Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the
District.
' There is a pending sale on this property.
I-3
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES
EXISTING FACILITY
FUTURE NEEDS
ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF
FUNDS
Truman High School
Modernization with expansion
(1)
Purchase and Relocate
Interim Capacity
(1)
Portables
Decatur High School, Federal
Expansion
(1)
Way High School and
Thomas Jefferson High
School
Various School Sites
Parking Safety; Network
(2)
Upgrades; Automated
Libraries;
Elementary Playgrounds; High
School Sports Fields;
Emergency Communications.
Notes:
(1) Anticipated source of funds is state matching funds, Impact Fees, future bond issues or
non -voted debt issues.
(2) Anticipated source of funds is future bond issues.
I4
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAIN
NEEDS FORECAST - NEW FACILITIES
NEW FACILITY
LOCATIO
N
ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS
MOT Site 1
Unknown
N/A
Senior High School Site
Unknown
2
New Senior High School Building
Unknown
2
New Middle School Site
Unknow
2
New Middle School
Unknown
2
Notes:
(1) Construction of Maintenance, Operations and Transportation (MOT) site is dependent on
sale of current MOT site.
(2) Anticipated source of funds is state matching funds, Impact Fees, future bond issues or
non -voted debt issues.
I-5
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Six Year Finance Plan
Secured Funding
1999
State Match Funds 6
57,000,000
Bond or Levy Funds 4
583,000,000
Sources 1999 2000
2001
2012
2003
2004
Total Revenue
Impact Fees 1 $1,000,000
S60,764
S17,000,000
New Middle School Site
S1,060,764i
Land Sale Funds 2 51,000,000 52,500,000
51,050,152
51,000,000
S4,550,152
State Match Funds 3 S932.1661 544,302
S5,000,000
S20,000,000
5876,468
TOTAL S1,832,166 S3,544,302
S1,110,916
SO
SO
SO
56,487,384
Unsecured Fundwl—g Sources
1999
State Match Funds 6
57,000,000
Bond or Levy Funds 4
583,000,000
Land Fund Sales
$800,000
Im act Fees 5)
51,500,000
TOTAL
592,300,000
NEW SCHOOLS
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Total Cost
New Middle School
52,000,000
S12,000,000
53,000,000
S17,000,000
New Middle School Site
51,000,000
S1,000,000
New Senior High School
S5,000,000
S20,000,000
515,000,000
S500.000
540,500,000
New Senior High School Site
51,000,000
52,200,000
I
S3,200,000
MODERNIZATION AND EXPANSION
Truman Senior High (Alternative)
$3,500,000
$2,500,000
56,000,000
Expansion Three High Schools
52.500,000
52,500,000
52,500,000
S7,500,000
Expansion Elementary Schools
S750,000
5750,000
a
S1,500
TEMPORARY FACILITIES
Portables (8)
5276,805
S276,805
OTHER
Safety Improvements (9a)
S500,000
5110001000
S1,000,000
S500,000
53,000,000
School Improvements (9b)
S500,000
S2,000,000
S1,600,000
5200,000
S200,000
S4,500,000'
Facilities Department
S250,000
$250,000
$250,000
$250,000
5250,000
S250,0001
S1,500,000i,
Library System Improvements
5650,000
$650,000
$1,300,000
MISS stem Project
S600,0001
S1010,0001
$700,000
TOTAL I
S1,500,0001
S6,250,0001
519,200,000
540,850,000
518,950,000
S1,226,80511
587,976,805
NOTES:
1. These fees arc currently bang held in a King County, City of Federal Way and City of Kent impact fee account, and will be
available for use by the District for system improvements
2. These funds come from various sales of land and are set aside for estimated expenditures
3. Guaranteed state match reimbursements
4 These funds, ifsecured, will be used for future projects
S. These arc projected fees based upon {mown residential developments in the Distnct over the next sir }cars
6. These funds are projected state matching funds
7. These funds are projected land sale income.
8. These fen represent the cost of mo%ing and siting existing portables The District may choose to purchase new
portables in the years shown This estimate may also include the cost of purchasing these portables
9a These projects have been appro%cd by the Board of Directors and cover most schools These projects do not increase capacity
These projects inlcudc parking and pedestrian safety impro,.cmcnts at 15 elementary schools
9b. These projects have been approsed by the Board of Directors and co%cr most schools These projects do not increase capacity.
These projects include school networks, information and library sustcros, new classroom start up, elementary pla)grounds and high school sports fields,
music equipment, emergenc% communication.
I-6
SECTION II
MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION H - MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
Federal Way Public Schools (the District) has twenty-three elementary schools (grades K-6), six
junior high schools (grades 7-9), three senior high schools (grades 10-12) and two alternative
schools (grades 7-12) for the 1998/99 school year. On April 20, 1996 the Federal Way Public
Schools Board of Education adopted the boundaries for these schools. The following maps show
the service area boundaries for each school for each grade level (the alternative schools, Harry S.
Truman High School and Merit School, serve students from throughout the District). The
identified boundaries are reviewed annually. Any change in grade configuration or adoption of
programs which affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas
The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility
_ infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public
facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that
development. School Districts are different. If the District does not have permanent facilities
available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can
be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities.
Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It is
recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools.
Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school.
It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a
complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district
and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single
development.
VIM
Junior High School Boundaries
II -3
Senior High School Boundaries
FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 210
ELEMENTARY
M
SCHOOLS•' HIGH SCHOOLS
code Code
0-9 61 Sacajawes 10 Adelaide C4 64 Illah" E-9
28 Camelot G-5 62 Lakots 0-6
Is
22 Entarpries,
14 Green Gables A-7 70 Saghalle C-8 s30 Lake Dolloff G-6 65 Tom G-3
2 Mark Twain —�
11 Lake Grove D-6 a Merit F-6
am
33 Lakeland F-9 RE
SCHOOLS
- ,a �
Mirror Lake 4
NautIlLm :-5 Code
Is Olympic View C-7
21 Panther Lake E-8 80 Decatur C-6
37 Rainier View F-10 81 Federal Way E-5
41 Sherwood Forest D-8 83 Thomas Jefferson G-4
24 Silver Lake D-7
Harry S. Truman F-6
26 Star Lake G-3 Merit F-4
25 Sunnycreat G-2
13 Twin Lakes 84
27 Valhalla G-4 Future School Sites, —
100 Educational Service Center F-6
99 Future Support Services E-8 Code --
97 Maintenance-Operatione-Transportefdon E-6
perks —
�
i
E
1
❑r •
. E
Willa
aANb
lip-
Z
rueuc scHoois I � '
II -4
1
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION III - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
Building Capacities - The Education Program
Portable Locations
Student ForecaFt - 1999 through 2004
Capacity Summaries
King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi Family Units
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Building Capacities
This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to
ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction
establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into
consideration the education program needs. The District has identified a Building Program
Capacity for each of the schools in the District. This Full Time Equivalent (FTE) capacity is
based on:
• The number of classrooms available in each school
• Any special requirements at each school
• The contracted class load by grade level
In general, the District's current standard provides that the average class size for a standard
classroom for grade K is 24 students , for grade 1-6 is 26 students and grades 7-12 is 25
students. Gate (Gifted and Talented Education) classrooms are 25 students, individual
education programs classrooms are 15 students, and soccial education classrooms are 12
students. This size is determined based upon current ratios and trends as well as the
classroom physical size. Educational Program Capacities change every year. This analysis is
for the 1998/99 school year. The capacity of an individual school could and does change at
any time depending on program changes which may require additional space.
III -2
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITIES
ELEMENTARY BUILDING JUNIOR HIGH BUILDING
PROGRAM CAPACITY PROGRAM CAPACITY
Adelaide
488
Bri adoon
528
Camelot
374
Enterprise
512
Green Gables
494
Lake Dolloff
482
Lake Grove
476
Lakeland
488
Mark Twain
503
Meredith Hill
498
Mirror Lake
398
Nautilus
542
Olympic View
450
Panther Lake
514
Rainier View
468
Sherwood Forest
550
Silver Lake
528
Star Lake
502
Sunnycrest
462
Twin Lakes
502
Valhalla
494
Wildwood
428
Woodmont
450
1998 TOTAL
11,131
Elementary Average 1 484
Notes:
Illahee
821
Kilo
854
Lakota
741
Saca'awea
828
Sa halie
768
Totem
709
1998 TOTAL
4,721
Junior High Average 787
SENIOR HIGH BUILDING
PROGRAM CAPACITY
Decatur 1,121
Federal Way
1,308
Thomas Jefferson
1,266
1998 TOTAL
3,695
Senior High Average 1 1,232
ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL BUILDING
PROGRAM CAPACITY
Ment School 1
Truman High School 194
1998 TOTAL 210
Elementary program capacities are based on the number of teaching stations
in the building, contracted class size, and special use classrooms in place
during the 98/99 school year. All available instructional space is calculated.
Secondary program capacities are based on peak loading.
The calculation is based on 25 students per available
teaching stations.
Capacities were calculated by the Study and Survey Committee.
III -3
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Portable Locations
The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic
education. It is not efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for
500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the
year and from year to year.
Portables are used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students until
permanent facilities can be built or boundary adjustments can be made. When permanent
facilities become available, the portable(s) is either moved to another school for an interim
classroom, or used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs. Some portables
may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may
choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. It is the practice and
philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that portables are not acceptable as permanent
- facilities.
The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for
temporary educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools.
III -4
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
PORTABLE LOCATIONS
PORTABLESLOCATED
AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
PORTABLESLOCATED
AT JUNIOR HIGHS
NON
iNSMMONAL INSTRUCTIONAL
Adelaide
3
Bri adoon
I
Camelot
1
Enterpnse
2
Green Gables
1
Lake Dolloff
3
Lake Grove
2
Lakeland
I
Mark Twain
3
Meredith Hill
I
Mirror Lake
2
Nautilus
I
Olympic View
2
Panther Lake
3
Rainier View
2
Sherwood Forest
3
Silver Lake
4
Star Lake
4
Sunn crest
1
Twin Lakes
2 1
Valhalla
Wildwood
4
Woodmont
2
TOTAL
48 1
PORTABLESLOCATED
AT JUNIOR HIGHS
III -5
PORTABLES LOCATED
AT SENIOR HIGHS
NON
UYSTRUCnONAL MMUCMNAL
Illahee
3
Kilo
3 1
Lakota
3
Saca'awea
2
Sa hahe
4
Totem
5
TOTAL
20 1
III -5
PORTABLES LOCATED
AT SENIOR HIGHS
PORTABLES LOCATED
AT SUPPORT FACILITIES
Science & Testing Ki
NON
INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTONAL
Decatur
4
Federal Way
1
Thomas Jefferson
1
Truman/Ment
8 1
TOTAL
4
TOTAL
13 1
PORTABLES LOCATED
AT SUPPORT FACILITIES
Science & Testing Ki
1
5 -Mile Lake
1
MOT
1
Clothing Bank
1
TOTAL
4
HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES
Mirror Lake 1
Sherwood Forest 1
Total 2
FEDERAL. WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Student Forecast
Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment
projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of
staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for
instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other
expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections.
Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections
must be detailed at various levels, district total, school -building totals, grade level and program level
to include vocational and special education students.
The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group
that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a stable population
the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages
and project the averages forward. This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned
with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of
history and weighted factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school
system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases
survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district
collects information on birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats these statistics as a
cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years.
The Federal Way School District is using three distinct methods for projecting student enrollments.
The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated
• The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are
forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years of
historical information and how they are weighted.
• The second method uses enrollment -forecasting software tied to a geographic information
system. MicroSAMT"- software establishes survival, migrant and repeater rates for each grade
level in a pre -defined geographic area. These rates are matched to the number of housing units
per area. The rates are then used to project the following year's enrollment based on the number
of planned new housing units. The software will project for five years.
• The third method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the
user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the
district level. The Enrollment Master- software provides statistical methods including trend line,
standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces
a five-year projection of school enrollment.
Short-term budget projections may be more conservative than the standard grade progression model.
For the 1998/99 school year, the district chose the Enrollment MasterTm projection using a two -
III -6
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
parameter method. This is the method suggested when a district is increasing or decreasing at a rate
that is different than the standard grade progression model. Standard grade progression is a
reasonably accurate method for the near term future when the near future looks much like the near
past. Using six years of enrollment history in the Federal Way District encompasses high growth
years and zero growth years which fall outside the range of the standard progression model. This
phenomenon is partially explained by the incorporation of the City of Federal Way and its affect on
new housing starts in recent history.
Long range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival
method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are
made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually. The study
includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and
population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a
similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial
management for the State of Washington.
Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way
School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school
district geography. These projections create a vision of the school district in the future.
III -7
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections
Simplified FTE (K Headcount =.S
FTE; Junior High FTE=.989 Headcount, Senior High FI'E =
932 Headcount)
Total K -12
Perces
School Year
Elementary
Junior High
Senior High
FTE
Chan
1992-93
10,342
4,352
3,681
18,375
1993-94
10,545
4,432
3,750
18,727
1.9%
1994-95
10,505
4,626
3,758
18,889
0.9%
1995-96
10,689
4,838
3,796
19,323
2.2%
1996-97
10,863
4,930
3,913
19,706
1.9%
1997-98
11,123
5,073
4,082
20,278
2.8%
1998-99
11,480
5,099
4,060
20,639
1.7%
P1999-00
11,656
SIM
4,321
21,130
2.3%
P2000-01
11,799
5,247
4,398
21,444
1.S°:
P2001-02
11,796
5,498
4,480
21,774
1.S%
P2002-03
11,795
S,73S
4,416
21,946
0.8%
New Configuration
Elementary K -S
Middle School 6-8
lligh School 9-12
P2003-04
9,976
5,703
6,539
22,218
1.2%
P2004-05
10,102
5,610
6,780
22,492
1.2%
23,000
22,000
21,000
C
O
20,000
U
9
= 19,000
a
18,000
O
17,000
16,000
15 000
Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast
h 1
� �
�pti
1b, Q^°°g°O QrE°�°
School Year
111-8
(:°" J� §p°o-°y
Q,yo ��.�
G
QrE
Q,yo
` �+• YIF+i' ' ` v
',';,.
'...• ,
,
tiffs
.fi
mr
ii m
{fi
h 1
� �
�pti
1b, Q^°°g°O QrE°�°
School Year
111-8
(:°" J� §p°o-°y
Q,yo ��.�
G
QrE
Q,yo
` �+• YIF+i' ' ` v
',';,.
'...• ,
,
tiffs
h 1
� �
�pti
1b, Q^°°g°O QrE°�°
School Year
111-8
(:°" J� §p°o-°y
Q,yo ��.�
G
QrE
Q,yo
3.0%
2.5%
2.0%
1.0%
'- !!
05%
d
N
A
C
x
FTE 6 Percent of Change
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Capacity Summaries
All Grades, Elementary, Junior High, and Senior High Schools
The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information and the Student Forecast
information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and
why there is a need for the district to use temporary facilities or interim measures.
The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire
District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, junior high, and
senior high levels individually.
The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in
place each year.
III -9
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACITY SUMMARY - ALL GRADES
rv'D 1T T MINT
Y Basic FTE Enrollment
Actual
21,130
- -
Projected
- -
22,218
22,4'
CAPACITY
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
Z
2003
200
BUILDING PROGRAM
20,438
20,630
20,744
21,024
21,146
21,368
CAPACITY
19,757
19,757
19,757
19,837
20,261
CD
21,035
22,3`
C7
a
Add or subtract changes to capacity
Special Education Changes
(26)
(26)
(26)
c
(26)
(26
Truman High modernization and expansion
106
?�
Increase Capacity at Three High Schools
450
=
New Middle School
800
y
New High School
0
1,350
0
Adjusted Program Capacity
19,757
19,757
19,837
20,261
T21,035
F22,359
22,3:
rv'D 1T T MINT
Y Basic FTE Enrollment
20,619
21,130
21,444
21,774
21,946
22,218
22,4'
Internet Academy Enrollment
181
500
700
750
800
991
850
90(
Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy
20,438
20,630
20,744
21,024
21,146
21,368
21,5'
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
1
1
1
1
1
2,175
PROGRAM CAPACITY
(681)
(873)
(907)
(763)
(111)
991
DLT f%9-ATAT2T l: !`AUArTTV
74?
W Current Portable Capacity
2,025
2,025
2,175
2,175
2,175
2,175
2,1"
Add/Subtract Portable Capacity
Federal Way Public Academy
1,344
150
1,268
1,412
2,064
3,166
2,9
Adjusted Portable Capacity
2,025
1 2,175
2,175
2,175
2,175
2,175
2,1'
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE
CAPACITY
1,344
1,302
1,268
1,412
2,064
3,166
2,9
III -10
CAPSUA198 /HEADER 07//5/99
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL. FACILITIES PLAIN
CAPACITY SUMMARY - ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
iil \ l� V �ya•a v♦ • a
Basic FTE Enrollment
Actual
11,656
- -
Projected
- -
9,976
10,1C
CAPACITY
1998
19992000
125
2001
2002
A
2003
200;
BUILDING PROGRAM
11,427
11,556
11,674
11,671
11,645
9,826
CAPACITY
11,131
11,131
11,131
11,105
11,079
1,200
11,053
11,02
c
n
1. Special Education Changes
(26)
(26)
(26)
0
(26)
(26)
c
a
Adjusted Program Capacity
11,131
11,131
11,105
11,079
11,053
11,027
11,0C
iil \ l� V �ya•a v♦ • a
Basic FTE Enrollment
11,480
11,656
11,799
11,796
11,795
9,976
10,1C
2. Internet Academy
53
100
125
125
150
150
150
Basic FIE Enrollment without Internet Academy
11,427
11,556
11,674
11,671
11,645
9,826
9,95
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM CAPACITY 1 (296) 1 (425) 1 (569) 1 (592) 1 (592) 1,201 1,03
1n1VT n/•ATAQT B rAIPArl'rV I
Current Portable Capacity
1,200
1,200
1,200
1,200
1,200
1,200
1,2C
Add/Subtract portable capacity
Move to High School
904
775
631
608
608
2,401
(12
Adjusted Portable Capacity
1 1,200
1 1,200
1 1,200
1,200
1,200
1,200
1,0'
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE
CAPACITY
904
775
631
608
608
2,401
2,1
NOTES:
1. Add Programs 3 ECEAP, 1 SBD(Severely Behavioral Disordered) and 1 Pre -School Program
This reduces Basic Education capacity in the school years indicated.
2. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities.
3. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and
other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily
house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a
calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used
will be based upon actual population needs.
III -11
CAPSUA198 HEADER 07/15/99
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACITY SUMMARY - JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
ENROLLMENT
Basic FTE Enrollment
SURPLUS
Actual
5,153
- -
Projected
- -
5,703
5,61
CAPACITY
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
z
2003
20,
BUILDING PROGRAM
5,011
4,953
4,972
5,223
5,460
5,528
CAPACITY
4,721
4,721
4,721
4,721
4,721
C7
5,521
5,5.
65(
c
re
0
1. Add New Middle School
800
�
d
o'
'
Adjusted Program Capacity
4,721
4,721
4,721
4,721
5,521
5,521
5,5:
ENROLLMENT
Basic FTE Enrollment
SURPLUS
5,080
5,153
5,247
5,498
5,735
5,703
5,61
2. Internet Academy
69
200
275
275
275
175
17.
Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy
5,011
4,953
4,972
5,223
5,460
5,528
5,4---
,4?
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM CAPACITY 1 (290) 1 (232) 1 (251) 1 (502) 1 61 (7) 86
RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3.
Current Portable Capacity
500
500
650
650
650
650
65t
Add/Subtract portable capacity
1
4. Federal Way Public Academy
210
150
399
148
711
G43
73c
Adjusted Portable Capacity
500
650
650
1 650
650
650
65(
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE
1
CAPACITY
210
418
399
148
711
G43
73c
NOTES:
1. Add new middle school
2. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities.
3. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and
other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily
house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a
calculated number only The actual number of portables that will be used
%will be based upon actual population needs
4 Federal Way Public Academy will increase capacity at one junior high site.
III -12
CAPSUA19811E4DER 07115/99
FEDERAL. WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACITY SUMMARY - SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
ENROLLMENT
Basic FTE Enrollment
Actual
4,321
- -
Projected
- -
6,539
6,7;
CAPACITY
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
z
2003
200
BUILDING PROGRAM
4,061
4,121
4,098
4,130
4,041
6,014
CAPACITY
3,905
3,905
3,905
4,011
4,461
n
4,461
5,81
d
n
Add or subtract changes in capacity
1. Truman Remodel
106
2. Add Capacity to Three High Schools
L3,905
450
3. Add New High School
1,350
o'
3
Adjusted Program Capacity
4,011
4,461
4,461
5.811
5.81
ENROLLMENT
Basic FTE Enrollment
4,120
4,321
4,398
4,480
4,416
6,539
6,7;
4. Internet Academy
59
200
300
1
350
375
525
57,
Basic Ed without Internet Academy
4,061
4,121
4,098
4,130
4,041
6,014
6,2(
I SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) I I I I I I I I
PROGRAM CAPACITY (156) (216) (87) 331 420 (203) (3S
RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 5.
Current Portable Capacity
325
325
325
325
325
325
32
Add\Subtract portable capacity
1
1
1
Add from Elementary
169
109
238
656
745
122_
1:
Adjusted Portable Capacity
325
325
325
325
325
325
4
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE
1
1
1
CAPACITY
169
109
238
656
745
122_
NOTES:
1. Truman High School modernization and expansion
2. Add capacity to three existing high schools
3. Add new high school
4. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities.
5. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and
other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily
house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a
calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used
will be based upon actual population needs.
III -13
CAPSUA19811F1iDER 07115/99
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLA.
King County, the City of Federal Way. and the City of Kent Impact Fee Calculations
Single and Multi -Family Residences
Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to
help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities.
To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was
established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was also substanially
adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish
a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school
district by each new single or multi -family unit and to gather some standard construction
costs, which are unique to that district.
- STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS
Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single
family units and multi -family units. The factors used in the 1998/99 Capital Facilities Plan
were derived using actual generation factors from single family units and multi -family units,
which were constructed in the last five- (5) years.
- IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
Following the calculations for the student generation factor is a copy of the Impact Fee
Calculation for single family and multi -family units based on King County Code 21 A and the
Growth Management Act.
Single Family Units
Multi -Family Units
III -14
z
O
F
a
w
z
LTJ
H
z
w
f�
F
a
w
}
h
O
R
CLI
z
z
O_
z
O
U
W
z
7i
to
f-
=
O
O
f-
N
r
O
N
0
«.
C
CO
CO
r-
CO
O
O
O
O
r
F-
r
O
O
M
r
LO
m
00
O
CD
jp 0 0
Co
r
0
0
v
0
N
Lo
f--
O
Go
+' j
0 7 tv
(D
CO
O
O
O
O
O
O
f-
f-
M
0
T
r`
p -
O
M
O
O
f.-
0
H .+ W
CO
O
(D
O
O
(D
O
O
N
O
C
fn
CO
r-
m
O
r-
IT
O
M
CJI
f -
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
C
O
L
N
O
M
v
N
O
N
O
fA ..
-
r
O
O
M
tt
LA
O
M
- r
M
C �(O•-OMtntOOOCO(D
= w O
f`
w
O
M^
O
O
v
v
M
C0
v
■."o V
OR
v
O
rOM000000O
OO
O
M
N
(D
O
N
M
M
r
r
C fA fy
o
r
O
.M-
eM-
O
O
0
Ln-
O
d
fA
O
O
O
C
O
0
0
0
0
0
L
v
.-
O
M
LO
P-
v
N
r-
O
O
M
Lo
r-
r
O
r-
O
= y 000OMO(D(A�MO
�.� vCOOOMN�
OONO
O
M
Lo
O
M
o
m
f-
f-
O
v
r C
O
ti
O
Cl
r (DO
w'
CM7
M
t��
fA
O
C
M
N
M
Cp
CO
CD
O
CMO
M
O
E j m
E..
M
MLOWM(DO(OCO000
v
O
M
N
v
(D
M
O
(D
d (/� LL
M
V
CD
Cn
v
M
CO
Cn
M
O
W
O
C
O
C
O
C
O
C
O
C
w L
O Of «
y 2 C
o ;vMNvv(DOCao0
Eco
z0N
O 07 N
d = C
M
N
(A
ct
t!7
M
O
E0?
z N
w
0 =°c
6) CLO
fy
O
r-
CO
D)
r
v
CO
CO
P-
O
r
r
IT
N
r
r
N
•-
m
N
E E 7
� d N
z W
!.
'A
c E
0
y
RC
L {L =
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
E
Zo
o Ecn
LL C
r
to
O
0
O
O
N
v
CO
d
N
N
M
CD
0
N
m
0
vm
�
d
r
cm
Z c f7
N
c
O
z
Wcl
y
j
O
`�
o
C7
Ors
W
p
z
H
??
o
c
c
d
cEa
(�
�
Y
O
o
C2:
e
C`
m_
L
N
O
c
y
c
d
GLd
N
E
ov=yCL
C3�'
41
Cn
—CD
(o
(a
(o
�
n
n
(nUMF-UUQ.¢
.c
0000
r`cOCD(n(nvv
a
c,arnrnrnm4,m
to
FEDERAL. WAY PliBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
IMPACT FEE
School Site Acquisition Cost: Student Student
Facility Cost / Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/
A __......e A.._e r,..,,..t„ QFR MFR SFR MFR
Elementary
Jr High
Sr High
0.00
..............................................................................................................................................
20.00
............................
40.00
$0
.1 00
$80,000
484
787
1,232
0 4080
0 1563
......................................
0.1146
0.0615
0.0342
0.0410
$0 $0
$199 $43
$298 $106
TOTAL
5496 5150
School Construction Cost: Student
% Perm Fac./ Facility Facility Factor
T -t.1 Qn Ft f Act Canacity SFR
Elementary
Jr High
Sr High (i)
ti)
Student
Factor Cost/ Cost/
MFR SFR MFR
96.95%
...........a....................................................................................................................
96.95/0
_..........................................................................................................................................
96.95%
$0
$17,000,000
$50,000,000
484
787
1,232
0.4080
0.1563
0.1146
0.0615
0.034 2
0.0410
$0 $0
$3,273 $716
$4,509 $1,613
Senior High includes new Senior High S 40,500,000 TOTAL
$7,782 $2,329
Expansion three Senior Highs
57,500,000
Truman High Expansion
S2,000,000
Temporary Facility Cost:
Student Student
_
% Temp Fac. Facility Facility
Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/
T�t.1 Qn Ft r'e%et R170
SFR MFR SFR MFR
Elementary
Jr High
Sr High
3.05%
$55,361
25
0.4080
0.0615
................. .............
$28 $4
......................o..
3:05 /o
............... ......................................................................
$55,361
25
0:1563
..................................
0.0342
$11 $2
$8 $3
...... ...............................
3.05%
$55,361
25
0.1146
0.0410
TOTAL
S46 S9
State Matching Credit Calculation: Student
Boeck Cost/ Sq. Ft. State Factor
Q.. Vt Qt -4—t m2tr11 RFR
Elementary
Jr High
New Sr High
Student
Factor Cost/ Cost/
MFR SFR MFR
$99.68
0
60 62%
0 4080
.......................................
0.0615
$0 $0
$99.68
99
....................................o
112
.....................
60 62/0
0.1563
0.0342
$1,058 $231
.........................................................a...............................................................
$99 68
120
60.62 /0
0.1146
0.0410
$831 $297
Total
S1,889 5529
Tax Payment Credit Calculation
Average Assessed Value (April 99)
Capital Bond Interest Rate (March 99)
Net Present Value of Average Dwelling
Years Amortized
Property Tax Levy Rate
Present Value of Revenue Stream
affAt 21S
$153,095$35,488
....................................
Single Family
5.11%
5..................
.11%
........................................................
$1,175:869
............. $272:571
1010
........................................................
$1 42
$1 42
,670
5387
07/15/99
9 59 AM
Single Family
Multi -Family
Residences
Residences
Mitigation Fee Summary
Site Acquisition Cost
$496
$150
Permanent Facility Cost
$7,782
$2,329
Temporary Facility Cost
$46
$9
State Match Credit
($1,889)
($529)
Tax Payment Credit
($1,670)
($387)
Sub -Total
S4,766
51,573
50% Local Share
$2,383
$786
Impact Fee
S2,383
5786
Impact Fee B
III -16
07/15/99
9 59 AM
SECTION IV
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAIN
SECTION IV
SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
The 1998/99 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document, based on the 1997/98 Capital
Facilities Plan. The changes between the 1997/98 Plan and the 1998/99 Plan are listed.
SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
Leased Space is added to the inventory
CURRENT INVENTORY OF NON -INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITES
Developed Property
Leased space is added to the inventory
Undeveloped Property
Site 98 is sold
Site 9 is pending sale.
NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES
Expansion of Decatur High School, Federal Way High School and Thomas Jefferson High
School is added.
Parking Safety, Network Upgrades, Automated Libraries, Elementary Playgrounds, High School
Sports Fields, and Emergency Communications are added
NEEDS FORECAST - NEW FACILITIES
New Elementary site and New Elementary School are removed.
New High School site, New High School and New Middle School are added.
The Six Year Finance has been rolled forward to reflect 1998/2004
IV -1
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION III - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
CAPACITY
Changes to building program capacity between the 1997/98 Capital Facilities Plan and the
1998/99 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page III -3.
PORTABLES
The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables
purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page III -5
STUDENT FORECAST
The Student Forecast now covers 1998 through 2004. The new forecast reflects an increased
rate of growth at a decreasing rate observed in the District. The student forecast can be found
_ on page III -8
CAPACITY SUMMARY
The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and
student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as
increases to capacity.
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY CODE 21A
The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors. The adjustment
made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 1997/98
Capital Facilities Plan and the 1998/99 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page IV -3.
IV -2
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1998/99 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 1997/98 TO 1998/99
STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS
Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a
period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in
student Generation factors between the 1997/98 Capital Facilities Plan and the 1997/98
Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age
of the developments.
IMPACT FEE
Item From/To
Percent of Permanent Facilities 97.34 % to
96.95%
Percent Temporary Facilities
Temporary Facility Cost
Boeck Cost/Sq. Ft
State Match
Average Assessed Value
Capital Bond Interest Rate
Property Tax Levy Rate
Single Family Fee
Multi Family Fee
2.66% to
3.05%
$62,368 to
$55,361
$97.23 to
$99.68
59.89% to
60.62%
SFR -
$143,979 to
$153,095.
MFR - $34,641
To $35,488.
5.19% to
5.11%
Comment
Report 43 OSPI
Updated portable inventory
Updated cost of most recently
purchased portable (Adelaide
Elementary)
Change per SPI
Change per SPI
Per Puget Sound Educational Service
District (ESD 121)
Market Rate
$1.47to $1.42 Per King County
$2,882. to Calculated Fee
$2,383.
$874 to $786 Calculated Fee
IV -3
r
PUBLIC SC HOOLS