Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3412Ordinance No. 3412 (Amending or Repealing Ordinances) CFN=1000 Planning Dept Passed - 7/21/1998 School Impact Fees - Amending KCC Sec. 12.13.160 Amends Ords 3222, 3260, 3281 Amended by Ords 3546;3591;3637;3675;3730;3777; 3827;3870;3904;3941;3987;4024;4057 The date ["Beginning July 1, 1998"] has led to confusion This date will be deleted from cover sheets of ordinance/resolution revision pages This cover sheet will be deleted on electronic pages only, no other deletions or changes have been made to the document — 6/21/2012 ORDINANCE NO. 371102 -- AN 71oZ AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, adopting an amendment to the Kent Comprehensive Plan by amending the Capital Facilities Plan element to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent and Federal Way School Districts for implementation of the current school impact fee schedule. WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requires internal consistency among Comprehensive Plan elements and the Zoning Map; and WHEREAS, to assure that Comprehensive Plans remain relevant and up- to-date, the GMA requires each jurisdiction to establish procedures whereby amendments to the Plan are considered by the City Council (RCW 36.70A.130(2)) and limits amendments to once each year unless an emergency exists; and WHEREAS, the City of Kent has established a procedure for amending the Comprehensive Plan set forth in Chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code which sets a deadline of September 1 of each year for acceptance of Comprehensive Plan amendments; and WHEREAS, by September 1, 1997, the City of Kent Finance Department submitted proposed amendments to the Capital Facilities element of the Comprehensive Plan to update Capital Facilities inventories, financial information, and project 1 School Impact Fee summaries, but the Capital Facilities Plans for the Kent and Federal Way School Districts were not available until after the deadline for filing the Comprehensive Plan Amendments; and WHEREAS, on February 9, 1998, the Public Works and Planning Committee declared an emergency pursuant to Chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code for acceptance of an emergency Comprehensive Plan Amendment in order to incorporate the school districts Capital Facilities Plans as an element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan - Capital Facilities Plan element; and WHEREAS, the current Capital Facilities Plans for the Kent and Federal Way School Districts were received by the City of Kent after April of 1998; and WHEREAS, on May 26, 1998, the Land Use and Planning Board reviewed the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent and Federal Way School Districts, conducted a public hearing, and recommended that the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan be amended to adopt the Capital Facilities Plans for the Kent and Federal Way School Districts, and that a new fee schedule reflecting the new base fee schedules be adopted, NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Capital Facilities Plan element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to include the Capital Facilities elements of the Kent and Federal Way School Districts as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 2 School Impact Fee SECTION2. Section 12.13.160 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 12.13.160. Base fee schedule. The following fee shall be assessed for the indicated types of development: School District Single Family Kent, No. 415 $3,744.05 Federal Way, No. 210 $2,883.00 Multi -family Multi -family studio $1,888.40 $ 0.00 $ 875.00 $ 0.00 SECTION 3. - Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. - Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. ATTEST: BRENDA JACO ;J;0111,00 zq IT r4 E, MAYOR -- CITY CLERK = APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROUSER A. LUBOVICH, 3 School Impact Fee PASSED: �5? day of I�- 51998. APPROVED: c— day of , 1998. 41 PUBLISHED: `T' day of &j '1998. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No.passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. (SEAL) BRENDA JAC B R, CITY CLERK P TAW\ORDINANC\schoohmpact ord doc 4 School Impact Fee �ov, Ili! Ful IMINI III PLAN 1998-1999 - 2003-2004 1 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Kent, Covington, Auburn, Black Diamond, Renton, SeaTac, Washington APRIL 1998 EXHIBIT lollw I wa I Ml- INIMI PLAN 1998-1999 - 2003-2004 Ep KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Kent, Covington, Auburn, Black Diamond, Renton, SeaTac, Washington APRIL 1998 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 12033 SE 256" Street Kent, Washington 98031-6643 (253) 813-7000 SIX-YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 1998-1999 - 2003-2004 April 1998 BOARD of DIRECTORS Bill Boyce Sandra Collins Susan Follmer Mike Jensen Linda Petersen ADMINISTRATION James L. Hager, Ph.D. Superintendent Daniel L. Moberly Assistant Superintendent of Business Services Fred High Executive Director of Finance Gwen Dupree Assistant Superintendent of Secondary Education Marcia Slater, Ph.D. Assistant Superintendent of Elementary Education & Instructional Services Margaret Whitney Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources & Student Support Services Bev Cheney Executive Director of Community Connections Kent Keel Executive Director of Information Technology April, 1998 Kent School District No. 415 Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan 1998-1999 - 2003-2004 April 1998 For information on the Plan, please call the Finance & Planning Department at (253) 813-7295. Capital Facilities Plan Contributing Staff Gwenn Escher, Community Planning Administrator Clint Marsh, Director of Facilities Edith Wheeler & Kathy Metzener, Facilities Department April, 1998 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX-YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TABLE of CONTENTS Section Page Number I Executive Summary 2 I I Six -Year Enrollment Projection 4 III Current District "Standard of Service" 8 I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools 12 V Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan 15 V I Relocatable Classrooms 18 VII Projected Classroom Capacity 20 VIII Finance Plan and Impact Fee Schedules 25 I X Appendixes 30 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 1998 Page 1 I Executive Summary This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Kent School District (the "District") as the District's facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn. This annual plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 1998 for the 1997-98 school year. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Any such plan will be consistent with this Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan. The Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan has been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent and Covington and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. An impact fee implementing ordinance for the unincorporated areas was effective September 15, 1993. A similar ordinance for the City of Kent portion of the District was effective in March, 1996. In order for impact fees to continue to be collected, all jurisdictions must also adopt this plan update. The Plan has also been submitted to the Cities of Auburn, Black Diamond, Renton and SeaTac. A financing plan is included in Section V I I I which demonstrates the District's ability to implement this Plan. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs of the District. In general, the District's current standard provides that class sizes for grades K - 3 should not exceed 26 students, class size for grades 4 - 9 should not exceed 29 students, and class size for grades 10 - 12 should not exceed 31 students. (See Section I I I for more specific information.) (Continued) Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 1998 Page 2 I Executive Summary (continued) The capacities of the schools in the District are calculated based on this standard of service and the existing inventory, which includes some relocatable classrooms. The District's 1997-98 program capacity of permanent facilities is 25,145 as adopted by the Board of Directors on March 11, 1998. Relocatables provide additional transitional capacity until permanent facilities are completed. Kent School District is the fourth largest district in the state. The actual number of individual students per the October 1, 1997, head count was 25,798. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) enrollment for this same period was 24,561.22 (Kindergarten at .5 and excluding Preschool Handicapped and Running Start students). The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of transitional facilities were among subjects studied by the Citizens' Concurrency Task Force. The Final Report of the Concurrency Task Force was approved by the Board of Directors on March 10, 1993. Findings and recommendations of the Concurrency Task Force are discussed further in Section I I I of this Pian. In subsequent years, the current plan is to maintain surplus capacity consistent with today's surplus. This surplus is achieved primarily through the transitional use of relocatables as recommended by the Citizens' Concurrency Task Force. The Concurrency Task Force reaffirms that, as has been the practice and philosophy of the Kent School District, and also based on the most recent recommendation of the Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee, portables are NOT acceptable as permanent facilities. Portables, or, using the more accurate but interchangeable term, "relocatables" may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Use of relocatable and transitional capacity and specific recommendations by the Concurrency Task Force are further discussed in Section V I of this Plan. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated annually, with changes in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 1998 Page 3 I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, growth projections are based on student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years. With a few notable exceptions, the expectation is that enrollment increases will occur District -wide. District projections are based on historical growth patterns combined with continuing development of projects in the pipeline dependent on market and growth conditions. (see Table 2) The student generation factor as defined on the next page, is the basis for the growth projections from new developments.The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools and monitor conditions to reflect adjustments in this assumption. The six-year enrollment projection anticipates significant enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. The King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system. Through the ten-year period, the percentage increases ranged from a low of 8.43% in 1987 to a high of 9.51 % in 1991. (See Table 1) Based on 1997 percentage, 8.44% of King County live births is equivalent to the number of students projected to enter kindergarten in the district for the next six-year period. (see Table 2) Early Childhood Education students (formerly identified as "Preschool Special Education [SE] or handicapped") are calculated and reported separately on a .5 FTE basis. The first grade population is traditionally 7 - 8% larger than the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District from private kindergartens. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions may be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The Kent School District primarily serves four permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated Metropolitan King County, the Cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn. The Lake Sawyer area has recently been annexed to the City of Black Diamond and the western portion of the district includes a small portion of the City of SeaTac. (Continued) Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 1998 Page 4 I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection (Continued) STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor" is defined by code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last five years. Following these guidelines, the student generation factor for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary .512 Junior High .188 Senior High .140 Total .840 Multi -Family Elementary .235 Junior High .080 Senior High .062 Total .377 The student generation factor is based on a survey of 2,525 single family dwelling units and 3,092 multi -family dwelling units. There was no adjustment for occupancy and studio apartments were excluded. Please refer to Appendix E on Page 33 for details of the Student Generation Factor survey. The actual number of students in those residential developments was determined using the District's Education Logistics (EDULOG) Transportation System. In 2,525 single family dwelling units there were 1,292 elementary students, 475 junior high students, and 354 senior high students for a total of 2,121 students. In 3,092 multi -family dwelling units, there were 727 elementary students, 247 junior high students, and 192 senior high students, for a total of 1,166 students. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 1998 Page 5 CA c O O O O tD ao r ao M r O M CD to IV CA r Nt CO O ��pp CD N M co v w 00 N v CO p Nt CA O r p O O O CA CA CA Cl 00 LO 00 CN O T N N N N N N N r,: r- c N N r O CO O d' N r N 00 d' N N N N O 1q,0 C71 r Oo CA N Cl w O N 01 O C71 M CA fl- to(0 O OctC CA CA •Ct p T co co N ao r N r N r r r T r T r r T N r - `a L,r) p O O r CA M !t co CO M O co r- -e CDr n C) r 1+ 1+ r O r N O N .t C) CD r CO M � O Oj tp C>: W O CA O O O! c' O> Oct � CO 'It tO v NOp r r N r N r r r r T r r r 47 N co O\ O O) 00 co O co CA O p M M M CD CO) 0) CA E CA ` M O CO M CD Nt O) r co O CA M O) t- N a Lr) CA CA CA O) Cil p CA c 00 00 CO N M O 0 N 04 r r T r r r T T r T T T r N C6 i O P- Go N C) r` r co O 0) T N O) a co N M r V i~ M O O T O T O � CO O p CA O O at to CA CA at OO t: F-� O M O N O r N N T r r r r r r r r r CO) tp i a MN p t C OC 3 CN N A O O 00 r N O to 0) N M CA O CA ci -0A CA a0 00 1` _ CO CO N st NO r N r r r r r r r r r r r N O .e M \ r` O v t• co O M r CA M N N co N co O e r C) r. C) et 'fit CO r CO M N N r 00 O CO O r O 00 O) CA a0 CA O ti t` Cq CD No et N N O O r r r r r r r r r r r T r N r v v O t�'' CIJ Cl) V CO C14 C) LO W 0) N CCD ai O CO O t- N C O N N co co CO O LO _ CA st M N N OTrr rrr r rrTrrr N M i i i c CA p r 00 CA CA N r O 00 CD M CO co Nit M t0 O 00 r M CA O to co co N r N r r `it co CO r` tO O N LIZ q NO: •Ct M N O M T T r !' T r T T T T r r r N T N 1 M c r CA CO M r 00 00 O CD CO O Nt N 0O O) O p M � r 00 O 0) r M M N O � M O N 0O CO h CO O N sf NO M M NO � N Cl) (D M 00 r r r r r T r r T r r T T r i C rT. v co M O T N M t0 O O O N t I-- M 0, O O 1 O M p O C) O N O CO `�t r et � M O N M M v M CA M C) M OO et w N M M M 5 DO r r T T T T T r T T T T T coO co p ! r tp 1 7 t � to t i C t a) m t =cccc- J t N C Z" C a) c a) o (DC y W co T N M O CO t- 0o O) CV W c w i Vy) 5 Q 0 N d U d N d CU N tV 0) ;o >, c c N m T E 2 =Co E C t�v tests two tots two Lw-w tea w Y Y Y C9 C9 o C9 C9 C9 C9 0 0 C9 0 0 Y U co d a Y KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX -YEAR ENROLLMENT PROJECTION King County Live Births' I. R 77-77-1- •7 C T 7-7-5-77F 21,573 1997 11998 1 1999 1 2000 1 L&00jj 2002 2003 -244 822 684 Kindergarten / Birth % 2 8.44% 8.44% King County Live Births' 23,049 22,330 21,972 21,817 21,573 22,395 23,079 ' Increase / Decrease 250 -719 -358 -513 -244 822 684 Kindergarten / Birth % 2 8.44% 8.44% 8.44% 8.44% 8.44% 8.44% 8.44% 2 Early Childhood Education @ .5 2 Kindergarten FTE @ .5 Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 Total Enrollment Yearly Increase Yearly Increase % Cumulative Increase 44 57 68 77 87 98 110 973 943 927 921 910 945 974 2,085 2,039 1,989 1,986 1,922 1,903 1,967 2,195 2,123 2,142 2,121 2,066 2,005 1,980 2,060 2,260 2,226 2,274 2,201 2,149 2,082 2,066 2,091 2,363 2,358 2,354 2,284 2,226 2,028 2,146 2,194 2,495 2,438 2,437 2,361 2,036 2,056 2,249 2,290 2,575 2,521 2,514 1,982 2,031 2,131 2,345 2,347 2,633 2,576 1,936 1,998 2,106 2,227 2,402 2,405 2,688 1,931 1,939 2,073 2,202 2,284 2,460 2,460 1,978 1,963 1,995 2,145 2,245 2,328 2,502 1,797 1,813 2,019 2,067 2,188 2,289 2,370 1,507 1,645 1,869 2,091 2,110 2,232 2,331 24,618 25,104 26,351 27,599 28,129 28,689 29,141 We 1 774 486 1,247 1,248 530 560 452 3.25% 1.97% 4.97% 4.74% 1.92% 1.99% 1.58% 774 1,260 2,507 3,755 4,285 4,845 5,297 1­.[F�ullTimeE uivalent (FTE) 24,618 1 25,104 1 26,351 127,5991 28,1291 28,61191 29,141 Projection through 2001 is King County actual live births and remainder is forecasted live births from trend data. 2 Kindergarten FTE enrollment projection at .5 is calculated by using the Districts past 5 - year weighted average of kindergarten enrollment compared to King County live births 5 years earlier. (ECE = Preschool Handicapped program) 9 Oct. 97 Full time equivalent (FTE) w/Early Childhood Education & Kindergarten at .5 & excluding Running Start = 24,618. Oct. 97 Individual student headcount = 25,798 students. Elem., Kindergarten & ECE @ HdCt + Secondary FTE = 25,621. G R O W T H P R O J E C T 1 O N S- Adjustments for current economic factors For facilities planning purposes, this six-year enrollment projection anticipates significant enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 April, 1998 Page 7 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of the District's facilities, the King County Code refers to a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the District which would, in the District's judgment, best serve its student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District and as affirmed by the Kent School District Citizens' Concurrency Task Force. Relocatables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (See AppendixA, a & C) The standard of service defined herein may change significantly in the future. Kent School District is currently involved in a long-term strategic planning process which may affect aspects of the District's "standard of service". Future changes to the standard of service will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students Class size for grades K - 3 should not exceed 26 students. Class size for grades 4 - 6 should not exceed 29 students. Program capacity for regular education classrooms is calculated at an average of 27 students per classroom because there are four grade levels at K - 3 and fluctuations between primary and intermediate grade levels (i.e. Third / Fourth grade split classes, etc.). Students may be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Students may have scheduled time in a special computer lab. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (continued) Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 1998 Page 8 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows: English As a Second Language (ESL) ECEAP & Headstart (Early Childhoon Education Assistance Programs) Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) Gifted Education Other Remediation Programs Learning Assisted Program (LAP) School Adjustment Programs for severely behavior -disordered students Hearing Impaired Mild, Moderate and Severe Developmental Disabilities Developmental Kindergarten Early Childhood Education (3-4 yr. old preschool handicapped students) Some of the above special programs require specialized classroom space, as well as music and physical education classrooms, computer labs, etc.; thus, the permanent capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in these special programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs. Some newer buildings have been constructed to accommodate most of these programs; some older buildings have been modified, and in some circumstances, these modifications reduce the classroom capacity of the buildings. When programs change, program capacity fluctuates and is updated annually to reflect the change in program and capacity. Current Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings. Class size for grades 7 - 9 should not exceed 29 students. Class size for grades 10 - 12 should not exceed 31 students. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (continued) Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 1998 Page 9 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) Identified students will also be provided other education opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows: Computer Labs English As a Second Language (ESL) Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Preschool and Daycare Honors (Gifted) and Advanced Placement Programs Basic Skills Programs Traffic Safety Education JROTC - Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps Variety of Technical & Applied Programs (Vocational Education) i.e. Home & Family Life (Cooking, Sewing, Child Development, etc.) Business Education (Keyboarding, Accounting, Business Law, Sales & Marketing, etc.) Woods, Metals, Welding, Electronics, Manufacturing Technology, Auto Shop, Commercial Foods, Commercial Art, Drafting & Drawing, Electronics, Careers, etc. Many of these programs and others require specialized classroom space which can reduce the permanent capacity of the school buildings. In addition, an alternative home school, choice and transition program is provided for students in grades 2-12 at Kent Learning Center. Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the District has concluded that the standard utilization rate is 95% for elementary schools and 85% for secondary schools. In future, the District will continue close analysis of actual utilization. Kent School District Citizens' Concurrency Task Force The Kent School District Board of Directors appointed a Citizens' Concurrency Task Force, made up of a cross section of the community, to assist in defining the District's Standard of Service. To accomplish this task, the Task Force was directed to study Kent School District enrollment history and projections, demographics and planned new developments, land availability for new schools, facility capacities and plans, frequency of boundary changes, and portable (relocatable) vs. permanent facility issues. A meeting for public input was conducted and the Final Report of the Citizens' Concurrency Task Force was approved by the Board of Directors on March 10, 1993. (continued) Kent School District Sot -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 1998 Page 10 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) The Final Report of the Citizens' Concurrency Task Force included Findings and Recommendations and provision for the following long term goals: A. Seek to reduce classroom utilization rates to allow more flexibility on the building level. B. Seek to lower average class size from that established for the 1992-93 school year. C. Seek to minimize boundary changes. D. Ensure that new permanent facilities are designed to accommodate portables: 1) to resolve current quality concerns 2) to provide for sites for portables to meet increased demand. E. Pursue modernization of current permanent facilities to resolve current quality concerns and to provide for additional sites for portables to meet increased demand. F. Pursue modernization or replacement of current portables to resolve quality concerns. G. Ensure that new portables meet current concerns of quality. H. Ensure that all sites for portables be modernized and utilities be installed to meet quality concerns. I. The quality of facilities, when using relocatable facilities, is a major concern of citizens of the Kent School District. Use of relocatable and transitional capacity as well as more specific concerns and recommendations by the Task Force are further discussed in Section V I of this Plan. The Task Force also states that it has reviewed and accepted the explanation of methodology and the conclusions reached in the enrollment Forecasting System report and recommends that methodology not be changed without Board approval. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 1998 Page 11 I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 25,145 students based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section I I I. Required relocatable capacity for 243 students brings the total capacity to 25,388. The first school day of October is set by OSPI as the enrollment count date for the year. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) student enrollment for October 1, 1997 was 24,618 with kindergarten and Early Childhood Education students (preschool special education or handicapped) counted at .5 and excluding College -only Running Start FTEs. (see Tabes 5 & 5 A -s -c) A headcount of all students enrolled on October 1, 1997 totals 25,798 which ranks Kent School District as the fourth largest district in the state of Washington. The breakdown at each grade span is as follows: 1997 - 1998 Permanent Relocatable Total 1997 - 1998 Current Capacity Capacity Capacity *FTE Enrollment . • Including Early Childhood Education OAents a 5 FrE Senior High 5,772 0 5,772 5,259 Junior High 6,123 0 6,123 5,803 Elementary 12,834 243 13,077 13,453 Kent Learning Center 416 0 416 103 District Total 25,145 243 25,388 24,618 FTE = Full Time Equivalent students with kindergarten & Earty Childhood Education students at .5 (P223 FTE enrollment without Early Childhood Education preschool students is 24,561.22. Headcount is 25,798.) • • Early Childhood Education (ECE) was previously known as the 'Special Ed Preschool" program or "Preschool Handicapped" program. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity. (see Table 3 on Page 13) Kent Learning Center replaced the alternative high school program previously known as Kent West. This special program serves grades 2 through 12 and is located in the former Grandview School in the western part of the District. It was designed and is currently configured as an elementary school. Calculation of Elementary, Junior High and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B and C on pages 30 and 31. A map of existing schools is included on Page 14. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 1998 Page 12 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 April, 1998 Page 13 1997-98 Year SCHOOL opened ABR ADDRESS Program Ca ac' Carriage Crest Elementary 19W CC 18235 - 140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 539 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timberiane Way SE, Covington 98042 462 Covington Elementary 1961 CO 17070 SE Wax Road, Covington 98042 530 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225 -180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 487 Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98031 479 East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 462 Fairwood Elementary 1969 FW 16600 - 148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 458 Glenndge Elementary 1996 GR 19405 -120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 539 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700 -191st Place SE, Kent 98042 481 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641 -144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 490 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915 - 186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 484 Kent Elementary 1938 KE 317 - 4th Avenue South, Kent 98032 245 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660 - 142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 590 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98031 513 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710 -108th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 506 Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621 -140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 564 Neely -O'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 436 Panther Lake Elementary 1938 PL 20831 -108th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 425 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 506 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825 -118th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 564 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030 -162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 564 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135 228th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 539 Scenic Hill Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98031 487 Soos Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 465 Springbrook Elementary 1969 SB 20035 -100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 455 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300 -132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 564 Elementary TOTAL 12,834640 Cedar Heights Junior High 1993 CH 19SE 272 Street, Covington 98042 1,011 Kent Junior High 1952 KJ 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 826 Mattson Junior High 1981 MA 16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042 827 Meeker Junior High 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 897 Meridian Junior High 1958 MJ 23480 - 120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 769 Northwood Junior High 1996 NW 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 994 Sequoia Junior High 1966 SJ 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98031 799 Junior High TOTAL 6,123 Kentlake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042 1,648 Kent -Meridian Senior High 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98031 1,487 Kentridge Senior High 1968 KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 1,299 Kentwood Senior High 1981 KW 25800 -164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 1,338 'Senior High TOTAL 5,772 Kent Learning Center (Grandview) 1965 LC 22420 Military Road, Des Moines 98198 416 DISTRICT TOTAL 25,145 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 April, 1998 Page 13 LO �• ca Ts Cu m O O O C r— U C O 3.9 Z CO U O O:.r L Rf C U c sr F-•E �CY Cu•�Ofr o cn -p y.. Q U) O v 'a m o 8 m m CU w 5 Cu O Q W � d y L C t m U _ U os 8 00 £ N U D • U •C_ o 00 m O E U� w u y Y � �z 3P1.81 O �m Y v C 8z Q um m Y mE 0 • Y> Ym0 C 0° OYy °m JO 'Um vg 81 C m v' W 3 of U_ Dp _a • O 4 Q C p O C CL Y O m E 2 CNI ID p a' CD c A 1-0 2 �O W c CO1 O 1p 3 yeti C 0 Om 8m Ym L c Y O O a w J� 2 �E •c N 3S anV WMI m H c m C W H m •� Om 5 (D.2 Y5 • w y Om m� o m 20 0 R Y> m° c z a 3S 9AV P°ZE l Uw *-O, 1U 2- 12 -! Uma L3x of mO C ccm c O o` mT �° 7e[ z L iA� Y� V i; x p Nw 7 •� t 5 °�m 20- m C �2 m m Z' mm m° s E ` H 4? c E u_d Iva 'C C) � u c O a) n CSW V° O L ¢°vm w O U U a �(D mC �Q� m• N C 3S OAV L4901 m z a w QO o m �w `� °c O) L OT L J « E o c ' a3 Co Obi _ cc —j 3S 8AV LOO L x m m N 1j + o -� U NW p (� N m� � O O O may/ `c E any J°µuao r U U Co ,c tWA U) = C /prnyBiH Aell°n 1SaM • 3CO 4m 8 (D r ao Z O c r' 16 r- a) CO CO m N et N y 2w ps` E Y S ajplSJa4ul Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 1998 Page 14 V The District's Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring of 1998, the following projects are currently underway in the District: • Elementary #27a is under construction at the southeast comer of Meeker and 64th Avenue S. near downtown Kent. The school is scheduled to open in January 1999. The current plan is for the students, staff and programs currently at Kent Elementary to move to the new location at that time. • The site for Elementary #29 is under construction at the northeast comer of SE 216th Street and 117th Avenue SE. The school is scheduled to open in the fall of 1999. • Site acquisition is in progress for Elementary #30 which is in the planning stages and scheduled to open in the fall of 2000. School service areas may be adjusted for the opening of these new schools to equalize enrollment population district -wide. • Junior High #8 is under review to fill future needs for grades 7 through 9. Potential sites for future facilities are listed in Table 4 and shown on the site map on page 17. • Glenridge Elementary (#28) and Northwood Junior High (#7) opened in the fall of 1996. Kentlake Senior High opened in the fall of 1997. Each of these schools combine with portables to continue to provide capacity for increases to enrollment from new development. Each of the elementary schools have capacity planned for approximately 540 students each, depending on placement of special programs. Junior high schools are planned for a program capacity of approximately 1,000 students and Kentlake Senior High (#4) has a current program capacity of 1,648. County and city planners, decision makers and school districts are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new developments. This should include sidewalks, pull-outs and tum arounds for school buses. Included in this Plan is an inventory of projects by type, size, location or region, and estimated completion date. Also included in the inventory are sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future. (see Tawe 4) The voter approved 1990 Bond Issue for $105.4 million included funding for the purchase of eleven sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Not all undeveloped properties meet school construction requirements and some property may be traded or sold to meet facility needs. Based on voter approval of $130 million in construction funding in February, 1994, elementary schools # 29 and # 30 are the last two to be constructed which have received voter approval. The Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee will reconvene to review future needs and make a recommendation to the Board for a future bond election for capital projects. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 1998 Page 15 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Projects Planned, Under Construction, or Providing Additional Capacity Site Acquisitions included SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE LOCATION fpr a Status Projected Projected % for Completion Program new I Date Capacity Growth ELEMENTARY SE 251 & 164 SE, Covington 98042 (Numbers assigned to future schools may not correlate with number of exisding schools.) Glenridge Elementary (# 28) 19405 -120 Ave SE, Renton New Open Fall 1996 539 50% Elementary # 27a t SE Comer 64 Ave & Meeker St New' Constuobon Jan -99 295 (net) 50% ' Elementary* 27a is planned as Kent Elementary Program Replacement in progress (540-245) Elementary # 29 (Funded) SE 216 & 117 SE, Kent 98042 New Constuchon 1999 540 50% Elementary # 30 (Funded) To be determined 2 New Planning 2000 540 50% JUNIOR HIGH Northwood Junior High (# 7) 17007 SE 184 St, Renton 058 New Open Fall 1996 994 25% Junior High # 8 (Unfunded) To be determined 2 New Preliminary 2002 1,000 75% Planning SENIOR HIGH Kentlake Senior High (# 4) 21401 SE 300 St, Kent 98042 TEMPORARY FACILITIES Replacement Relocatables For replacement as needed Additional Relocatables (13) For placement as needed SUPPORT FACILITIES Satellite Bus Facility To be determined 2 OTHER SITES ACQUIRED New Open Fall 1997 1,648 40% Additional Capacity New Planning 1999 0 New Planning 1999 27 - 31 each 100% New Planning 7 N / A Covington area (Near Mattson JH) SE 251 & 164 SE, Covington 98042 Covington area (Scarsella) SE 290 & 156 SE, Kent 98042 Ham Lake area (Pollard) 16820 SE 240, Kent 98042 Horseshoe/Keevies Lake area (West) SE 332 & 204 SE, Kent 98042 PT / HE area (Williams / Plemmons) SE 286 & 124 SE, Kent 98031 Sequoia area (Yau assemblage) SE 270 & 120 SE, Kent 98031 Shady Lake area (Sowers, etc.) 17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98058 So. King Co. Activity Center (Nike site) SE 167 & 170 SE, Renton 98058 Notes: ' Elementary # 27a is planned as Kent Elementary Program Replacement. 2 Some sites are acquired but placement has not been determined. Type Elementary Elementary Elementary Junior High Junior High Elementary Elementary School or Support Facility Kent School District Sb( -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 April, 1998 Page 16 Z.jKarr 29 T., Xar -site E 0 E 7 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 , 0 itp Sites Acquired or Under Construction Lai. 1 S = Senior High site J = Junior High site E K -(7 S_ rr a f "i '. X Support Facility she t Map source: Kling County Planning & Community Developrinen. Division Sfte Identification by Kerd School District 71 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 1998 Page 17 0- 0 r. .'A At 1137 ERSkEV E Sj E 0 E 7 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 , 0 itp Sites Acquired or Under Construction Lai. 1 S = Senior High site J = Junior High site E K -(7 S_ rr a f "i '. X Support Facility she t Map source: Kling County Planning & Community Developrinen. Division Sfte Identification by Kerd School District 71 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 1998 Page 17 0- 0 r. V I Relocatable Classrooms Currently, the District utilizes 138 total relocatables. Of this total, 54 are utilized to house students in excess of permanent capacity, 79 are used for program purposes at school locations, and five for other purposes. (See Appendices A B C D) Based on enrollment projections and funded permanent facilities, the District anticipates the need to purchase some relocatables during the next six-year period. In the Final Report approved by the Board of Directors on March 10, 1993, the Kent School District Citizens' Concurrency Task Force reaffirmed that, as has been the practice and philosophy of the Kent School District, based on the most recent recommendation of the Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee, portables (or "relocatables") are NOT acceptable as permanent facilities. In addition to the Findings and Recommendations regarding portables listed in Section I I I, "Standard of Service," the Task Force also listed some specific concerns in regard to use of portables as interim or transitional capacity: I. The quality of facilities, when using relocatable facilities, is a major concern of citizens of the Kent School District. That the Kent School District should consider the following factors and priorities when using, purchasing and modernizing portables: A. HIGHEST CONCERNS 1. Adequate heat 2. Portable covered walkways, where practical 3. Adequate ventilation 4. Fire Safety B. MODERATE CONCERNS 1. Adequate air conditioning 2. Security 3. Intercoms / Communication 4. Restroom facilities 5. Storage facilities 6. Crowding / class size 7. Noise 8. Availability of equipment (i.e. projectors, etc.) 9. Lack of water (use bottled water/portable tanks for drain) (Continued) Kent School District Sb( -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 1998 Page 18 V I Relocatable Classrooms (Continued) For the purpose of clarification, the term "portables" and the more descriptively accurate term, "relocatables" are used interchangeably in this Plan as well as in the Concurrency Task Force Report. The reports also reference use of portables or relocatables as interim or transitional capacity/facilities. During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District's relocatables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the relocatables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these relocatables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Although the Citizens' Concurrency Task Force has reaffirmed that portables are not acceptable as PERMANENT facilities, they did recommend that portables, or relocatables, may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Portables, or relocatables, currently in use will be evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced. Quality concerns will be among those addressed by the next Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee in review of capital facilities needs for the next bond issue. The Plan projects that the District will use relocatables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of relocatables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between relocatables, emerging technologies and educational restructuring will continue to be be examined. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 1998 Page 19 VII Projected Six -Year Classroom Capacities To summarize the current enrollment and program capacity, the breakdown at each grade span is as follows: 1997 - 1998 Permanent Relocatable Total Oct. 1, 1997 Surplus Grade Span Capacity Capacity Capacity "FTE Enrollment Capacity • • Including Early Childhood Education students 5 1997 - 1998 Permanent Relocatable Total Oct. 1, 1997 Surplus Grade Span Capacity Capacity Capacity "FTE Enrollment Capacity Senior High Elementary and Kent Learn 5,772 0 5,772 5,282 490 Junior High 6,123 0 6,123 5,849 274 ing Center 13,250 243 13,493 13,487 6 Distri ct Total 25,145 243 25,388 24,618 770 ' FTE =Full Time Equivalent students with kindergarten 8 Early Childhood Education (ECE) students at .5 FTE enrollment excluding Running Start and Early Childhood Education students is 24,561.22. Total District headcount is 25,798. ' •Early Childhood Education (ECE) was previously known as the 'Special Ed Preschool* program or 'Preschool Handicapped" program. The program capacity study was updated for changes in programs as well as the addition of Northwood Junior High, Kentlake High School and the Kent Learning Center program. Based on the enrollment forecasts, current inventory and capacity, current standard of serv ice, relocatable capacity, and future planned classroom space, the District anticipates having sufficient capacity to house students over the next six years. (See Table 5 and Tables 5 A -B -C) This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There will be significant need for new schools to accommodate growth within the District. Some schools, by design, may be opened with relocatables on site. Boundary changes, movement of relocatables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in solving overcrowding and underutilization of facilities in different parts of the District. Kent School Distri ct Sot -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 1998 Page 20 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT Permanent Program Ca acit ' 21,964 New Permanent Construction ' Glenridge Elementary (# 28) 539 Northwood Junior High (# 7) 994 Kentlake Senior High (# 4) 1,648 Elementary # 27a To replace Kent Elementary - Net Capacity Gain 25,145 25,440 25,980 26,520 26,520 27,520 295 Elementary # 29 540 Elementary # 30 540 Junior High # 8 1,000 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 25,145 25,440 25,980 26,520 26,520 27,520 27,520 Interim Relocatable Ca acit Elementary Relocatable Capacity Required 243 189 81 Junior High Relocatable Capacity Required 203 667 928 377 609 Senior High Relocatable Capacity Required 124 558 775 1,085 1,457 Total Relocatable Capacity Required 243 189 408 1,225 1,703 1,462 2,066 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 1 25,388 1 25,629 1 26,388 1 27,745 1 28,223 1 28,982 1 29,586 2 'OTAL FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 24,618 25,104 26,351 27,599 28,129 28,689 29,141 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 770 525 37 146 94 293 445 ' Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity. 2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment (ie. ECE Preschool Handicapped & 1/2 day Kindergarten student =.5). Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 April, 1998 Page 21 SCHOOL YEAR 1997-98 1998-99 1 1999-2000 1 2000-200 2001-2002 1 2002-2003 1 2003.2004 Actual P R O J E C T E D Permanent Program Ca acit ' 21,964 New Permanent Construction ' Glenridge Elementary (# 28) 539 Northwood Junior High (# 7) 994 Kentlake Senior High (# 4) 1,648 Elementary # 27a To replace Kent Elementary - Net Capacity Gain 25,145 25,440 25,980 26,520 26,520 27,520 295 Elementary # 29 540 Elementary # 30 540 Junior High # 8 1,000 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 25,145 25,440 25,980 26,520 26,520 27,520 27,520 Interim Relocatable Ca acit Elementary Relocatable Capacity Required 243 189 81 Junior High Relocatable Capacity Required 203 667 928 377 609 Senior High Relocatable Capacity Required 124 558 775 1,085 1,457 Total Relocatable Capacity Required 243 189 408 1,225 1,703 1,462 2,066 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 1 25,388 1 25,629 1 26,388 1 27,745 1 28,223 1 28,982 1 29,586 2 'OTAL FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 24,618 25,104 26,351 27,599 28,129 28,689 29,141 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 770 525 37 146 94 293 445 ' Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity. 2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment (ie. ECE Preschool Handicapped & 1/2 day Kindergarten student =.5). Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 April, 1998 Page 21 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY [Elementary -Permanent Program Capacity 12,295 13,250 13,545 14,085 14,625 14,625 14,625 Kent Learning Center - Special Program 416 [Now Permanent Elementary Construction Glenridge Elementary (# 28) 539 Replaced Spring Glen Elementary - leased from Renton SD Elementary # 27a 295 (Net capacity) Replace Kent Elementary 540 - 245 = 295 Net Capacity Elementary # 29 540 Elementary # 30 540 Subtotal 13,250 13,545 14,085 14,625 14,625 14,625 14,625 lRelocatable Capacity Required 2 243 189 81 TOTAL CAPACITY 2 13,493 13,734 14,166 14,625 14,625 14,625 14,625 FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 3 13,487 13,715 14,158 14,522 14,553 14,342 14,214 SURPLUS(DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 6 19 8 103 72 283 411 1 Kent Learning Center is a special program at Grandview School serving students in Grades 2 through 12. The school was designed and is currently configured as an elementary school. 2 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity. 3 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or Projection (ie. Early Childhood Education students & 1/2 day Kindergarten students = .5). Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A April, 1998 Page 22 SCHOOL YEAR 1997-98 1998-99 1 1999-2000 2000-2001 1_2001-2002 1 2002-2003 1 2003-2004 l] Actual P R O J E C T E D [Elementary -Permanent Program Capacity 12,295 13,250 13,545 14,085 14,625 14,625 14,625 Kent Learning Center - Special Program 416 [Now Permanent Elementary Construction Glenridge Elementary (# 28) 539 Replaced Spring Glen Elementary - leased from Renton SD Elementary # 27a 295 (Net capacity) Replace Kent Elementary 540 - 245 = 295 Net Capacity Elementary # 29 540 Elementary # 30 540 Subtotal 13,250 13,545 14,085 14,625 14,625 14,625 14,625 lRelocatable Capacity Required 2 243 189 81 TOTAL CAPACITY 2 13,493 13,734 14,166 14,625 14,625 14,625 14,625 FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 3 13,487 13,715 14,158 14,522 14,553 14,342 14,214 SURPLUS(DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 6 19 8 103 72 283 411 1 Kent Learning Center is a special program at Grandview School serving students in Grades 2 through 12. The school was designed and is currently configured as an elementary school. 2 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity. 3 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or Projection (ie. Early Childhood Education students & 1/2 day Kindergarten students = .5). Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A April, 1998 Page 22 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY JUNIOR HIGH Junior High Permanent Program Capacity 5,129 6,123 6,123 6,123 6,123 6,123 7,123 New Permanent Junior High Construction Northwood Junior High (# 7) 994 SCHOOL YEAR 1997-98 1998-99 1 1999-2000 I 2000-M 1 2001-2002 1 2002-2003 1 2003.2004 Actual P R O J E C T E D Junior High Permanent Program Capacity 5,129 6,123 6,123 6,123 6,123 6,123 7,123 New Permanent Junior High Construction Northwood Junior High (# 7) 994 Junior High #8 1,000 Subtotal 6,123 6,123 6,123 6,123 6,123 7,123 7,123 lRelocatable Capacity Re uired' 203 667 928 377 609 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 1 6,123 6,123 6,326 6,790 7,051 7,500 7,732 FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 25,849 5,968 6,310 6,774 7,033 7,498 7,724 T SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 274 155 16 16 18 2 ' Capacity numbers are based on standard of service for program capacity. 2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment The equivalent of approximately 50 FTE Junior High students are served part of the day at high schools. 8 April, 1998 Page 23 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH [Senior High Permanent Program Capacity 4,124 5,772 5,772 5,772 5,772 5,772 5,772 New Permanent Senior High Construction Kentlake Senior High (#4) 1,648 Subtotal 5,772 5,772 5,772 5,772 5,772 5,772 5,772 lRelocatable Capacity Re uired' SCHOOL YEAR 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 1 2003-2004 Actual P R O J E C T E D [Senior High Permanent Program Capacity 4,124 5,772 5,772 5,772 5,772 5,772 5,772 New Permanent Senior High Construction Kentlake Senior High (#4) 1,648 Subtotal 5,772 5,772 5,772 5,772 5,772 5,772 5,772 lRelocatable Capacity Re uired' 124 558 775 1,085 1,457 TOTAL CAPACITY' 1 5,772 5,772 5,896 6,330 6,547 6,857 7,229 FTE ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 2 5,282 5,421 5,883 6,303 6,543 6,849 7,203 [SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 490 351 13 27 4 8 26 ' Capacity numbers are based on standard of service for program capacity. 2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment, excluding Running Start students. The equivalent of approximately 50 FTE Junior High students are served part of the day at high schools. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C April, 1998 Page 24 VIII Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 1998 - 1999 through 2003 - 2004. The financing components include secured and unsecured funding. The plan is based on voter approval of future bond issues, securing of state funding and collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 1998 Page 25 et Zg f- a Uw � U N Z G Z J EL 2 W N } X F- N Z W Y 0 O N O ao O O O N N �? 0 5� 01 O O r 2G � N eH iA 0 O N O ao O O O N 1 1 i 1 1 ; ♦ a w 01 O O r � eH iA /N4 to w 6 T d l0 ao $ 25 1 1 i 1 1 ; ♦ LL LL LL LL m LLCO 0 .i 1 W W J J v J U U d O rn w w H u¢ LL W N Z ac ac tO ¢ cn Z Z Z O Ui i � d d d CL d w W ~ W f ani Y W W W Q T d l0 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors - Single Family Elementary Junior High Senior High Total 0.512 0.188 0.140 0.840 Projected Student Capacity per Facility Elementary 540 Junior High 1,000 Senior High 1,650 Required Site Acreage per Facility Elementary (required) 11 Junior High (required) 21 Senior High (required) 26 New Facility Cost Elementary Junior High Senior High Temporary Facility Square Footage Student Generation Factors - Multi -Family Elementary 0.235 Junior High 0.080 Senior High 0.062 Total 0.377 SPI Square Footage per Student Elementary 80 Junior High 113.33 Senior High 120 Average Site Cost / Acre Elementary $45,173 Junior High $45,173 Senior High $45,173 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost $9,000,000 Elementary @ 27 $51,000 $17,000,000 Junior High @ 29 $51,000 $38,000,000 Senior High @ 31 $51,000 Elementary 70,636 Junior High 22,696 Senior High 22,568 Total 115,900 Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary 1,282,101 Junior High 738,840 Senior High 830,629 Total 2,851,570 Total Facilities Square Footage Elementary 1,352,737 Junior High 761,536 Senior High 853,197 Total 2,967,470 Developer Provided Sites / Facilities Value 0 0 Dwelling Units State Match Credit State Match Percentage Boeckh Index Factor Current Boeckh Index 55.64% $97.23 District Average Assessed Value Single Family Residence $149,635 District Average Assessed Value Multi -Family Residence $48,992 District Debt Service Tax Rate Current / $1000 Rate $2.97 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Current Bond Buyer Index 5.19% Kent School District Sic -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 1998 Page 27 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage I Average Site Cost/Acre I Factl A 1 (Elementary) 11 $45,173 A 2 (Junior High) 21 $45,173 A 3 (Senior High) 26 $45,173 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent/Total S ity Capacity I Student Factor I L Construction Cost 540 0.512 $471.14 1,000 alas $178.34 1,650 0.140 $99.65 0.96 A —> $749.14 State Match Credit per Single Family Residence Formula: Boeckh Index x SPI Square Footage x District Match % x Student Factor I Boeckh Index L Construction Cost I Facility Capacity I Student Factor I Footage Ratio 80 B 1 (Elementary) $9,000,000 540 0 512 0.96 $6,192.00 B 2 (Junior High) $17,000,000 1,000 0.188 0.96 $3,068.16 B 3 (Senior High) $38,000,000 1,650 0.140 0.96 $3,095.27 B —> $14,355.43 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity I Student Factor I Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $51,000 27 0.512 0.04 $38.68 C 2 (Junior High) $51,000 29 0.188 0.04 $13.22 C 3 (Senior High) $51,000 31 0.140 0.04 $9.21 State Match Credit per Single Family Residence Formula: Boeckh Index x SPI Square Footage x District Match % x Student Factor I Boeckh Index I SPI Footage I District Match % D 1 (Elementary) $97.23 80 0,5564 D 2 (Junior High) $97.23 113.33 0.5564 D 3 (Senior High) $97.23 120 0.5564 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average Residential Assessed Value $149,635 Current Debt Service Tax Rate $2.97 Bond Buyer Index Interest Rate 5.19% Discount Period (10 Years) 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence Subtotal D = State Match Credit per Residence TC = Tax Credit per Residence Subtotal Total Unfunded Need Developer Fee Obligation FC = Facility Credit (if applicable) $749.14 $14,35543 $61.12 $15,165.69 $4,277.38 $3,400.22 $7,677.59 Net Fee Obligation per Single Family Residence Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan $7,488.10 C —> $61.12 Student Factor I 0.512 $2,215.89 0.188 $1,152.63 0.140 $908.86 D —> $4,277.38 TC —> $3,400.22 FC —> 0 $3,744.05 0 $3,744.05 April, 1998 Page 28 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Temporary Facility Cost per Multifamily Residence Unit Formula* ((Facility Cost/ Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary/ Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facilely Capacity I Student Factor I Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $51,000 27 0.235 0.04 $17.76 C 2 (Junior High) $51,000 29 0.080 0.04 $5.63 C 3 (Senior High) $51,000 31 0.062 0.04 $4.08 C —> $27.46 State Match Credit per Multi -Family Residence Unit I Required Site Acreage I Average Sele Cost/Acre I Facility Capacity I Student Factor A 1 (Elementary) 11 $45,173 540 0.235 $216.24 A 2 (Junior High) 21 $45,173 1,000 0.080 $75.89 A 3 (Senior High) 26 $45,173 1,650 0.062 $44.13 D—> $1,910.03 A —> $336.27 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent / Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity I Student Factor I Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary) $9,000,000 540 0.235 0.96 $3,760.00 B 2 (Junior High) $17,000,000 1,000 0.080 0.96 $1,305.60 B 3 (Senior High) $38,000,000 1,650 0.062 0.96 $1,370.76 B —> $6,436.36 Temporary Facility Cost per Multifamily Residence Unit Formula* ((Facility Cost/ Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary/ Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facilely Capacity I Student Factor I Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $51,000 27 0.235 0.04 $17.76 C 2 (Junior High) $51,000 29 0.080 0.04 $5.63 C 3 (Senior High) $51,000 31 0.062 0.04 $4.08 C —> $27.46 State Match Credit per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula* Boeckh Index x SPI Square Footage x District Match % x Student Factor l3oeckh Index SPI Footage District Match % Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $97.23 80 0.5564 0.235 $1,017.06 D 2 (Junior High) $97.23 113.33 0.5564 0.080 $490.48 D 3 (Senior High) $97.23 120 0.5564 0.062 $402.49 D—> $1,910.03 Tax Credit per Multi -Family Residence Unit Average Residential Assessed Value $48,992 Current Debt Service Tax Rate $2.97 Bond Buyer Index Annual Interest Rate 5.19% Discount Period (10 Years) 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility/ Site Value I Dwelling Units 0 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per Multi -Family Unit B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit Subtotal D = State Match Credit per MF Unit TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit Subtotal Total Unfunded Need Developer Fee Obligation FC = Facility Credit (if applicable) $33627 $6,436.36 $27.46 $6,800.09 $1,910.03 $1,113.27 $3,023.30 Net Fee Obligation per Mufti -Family Residence Unit Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan $3,776.80 TC —> $1,113.27 FC —> 0 $1,888.40 0 $1,888.40 April, 1998 Page 29 IX Appendixes Appendix A: Calculations of Capacities for Elementary Schools Appendix B: Calculations of Capacities for Junior High Schools Appendix C: Calculations of Capacities for Senior High Schools Appendix D: Use of Relocatables Appendix E: Student Generation Factor Survey Appendix F: Summary of Changes to 1997 Capital Facilities Plan Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 1998 z W J J 0 lz Z W H Z Z) 0 U O V C W W 1 W J m v Q C U z 0 J U � � O H 0 � J � 0 w U Z N — Z Y (� Q CL Q U v� v a 9 E 'vS in g IS a cc n i8 v iv v w v v a 9 w G A vNi 4 R a § 9 A§ v a W 1- 10 0 V V M W 0 W h 0 0 0 h 0 W h 0 10 QO A W W W V O t0 O N O O r O O O O a0 ! O O E � • m 4 a O V h M 10 O O V M 0 1, 10LL N iD �- U � m d, a � r Ep n N O O O O O O O O N O O O O N N O N O O O O O N cr U E E � B O O O M O N O O O O O O O N O O N O O O V O .- E ffi � � a M r M N M V N N IA N r N M h {0 V r N O M N N N CL m o: La Of ��1 1�p {O�! 1p� h Ol �Np 1p(pI O ppb IA ppb Mpp N app �ep� O 1��p IA 11Y a U � p p O O O V O V O �j O N l") IA O O N O O N O O O O N O a U ik � V N M 10 N M V V N N V IA N M M V V IA r V V N N M M M V IA ej IA IA Q R � IA V V Q N (O � N 10 V V In IA In IA IA V V IA S B QEE y N 0] W O) P CO fD N O O n O M O O1 N h 10 O N N Of h h N E s N N N r N r r r N N N r r '- N ZW U �up a a Oo g o� U U U V O w C7 2 N to U) vii r Y m m gg c o Y U E 0 �i P mrO c to m m "� Y m z T m oo c U ca U U U a w Y i z a a a m e a cn 0 r ig Q x 0 Z W IL CL Q m a a Q � M N TO E 0 � u E A o e t vj C V Go 9 +-00 a C O n ww V IM b r ig Q x 0 Z W IL CL Q (p O m m E lh r IA IA Of cl N mC " = W ' IA L r LU = W CD N Lfi JC w E NCli O C Q) r O r E E N 'n Y Z g A W 2S co 0 co z U E E a O O E g a: OLU N W U � N W g N .- O EO = g0 00 cq O V IN m c o n C N r N CO N N .W U Q ILL r N U t7 a E � O yay V A N N N J o g m mao Ln eq m LL m �f U � U Z O m W N N N W 00 CO H W 0: U m N � LL _V C U � G N} g _D N O h O V 10 M W D 0 U U RC4 is CL 1O m o X JO IT a� O w d U co � O w S � E Z W U Z Qe1 9 O § O N C9 N O N O a to ' a °' x d Q H V v �- _X o No COCO N11 CO 1 a � aaq Z j ,c IL 81 b O EES A Lo 0 O a V Ln p 1A Q "' p N a0 N d � Q a �p W a l'7 p CO � p flD V o ('� -V W $ IL CL vv '� _m uJ 0 M y U ui i tOp� I tp tD �j OOH $ C ' �p 7 h o fa li W 8 O co a U 0 t0 .- fD . � O N N N N N N � N '� r N U m Q G U Z N C O Z W H V W p p O C W W ^ n L Q a f.. m c ul VV N W IA p N N C N Im m U';: C O !h m � O .1 l7 n _A z N W V m Y U Y m Z0m coN ik N U (p O In IA N f0 N R = W N w E NCli O C Q) r r r N N 'n Y m W N E E a O O O N W U � g0 00 cq O V IN N O O TEi V n O N U t7 a O yay V A N N N V o W 00 CO /h N N � LL U � U RC4 is CL 1O m o IT a� O w d U co E a V v �- _X aaq Z j 81 b O O N N V p a a � d � Q ` cm m � $ IL CL vv '� _m N W pL 'l�pj N Q0 N AN W O co a U .- N md y U � N r' O N r N = �• c W O C O W H V W p p O C W W ^ n L Q CL ul VV 0) W IA p N N C N m C O !h m � O .1 l7 n _A N W V N m ik N U V M N p 09 V Q Y Y Y Q =CM m -jU F- a F- �i- S c Wco a s F- m m E (V Y 2go m m J w m CO) LL _ Y � � Z W V � N_ 0 D i J LLJ O O W (J) Z W Y g � � 07 T a «2 3 � 0 § k § w � ■ C4 z fr. $ � d z 2 0 2 Cl) §2 � — a � C14 _ % 0 2 o R m § � �. — & = 3 M J 0 2 § $ — A 2 a � CD m ~ 2 2 � ) - § A � 2 » $ § PL J 0 0 7 @ � , $; 2 o o B � . — R 0 o 0 o 0 § R § 2. § C.)- § � 3 } § J 2 v k R R ■ k cocn J @ cc ) cr J k 9 © 0 e k tCL o t W © U k X: 8 © k (A to I 2 � 7 JccCL ? k f cc t ! CO) cc g � � 07 T LO IqT O Z F- C) R F- U) 0 J O O U) F - Z W Y T m Z 7 W o` U N LL C O R d r_ C N IV 1m m a R 0 Z W IL IL Q c`i 10 ((�� e} pp��oN N fCrp� �j r IA O N O N O r 0 e- O r C C O O C C C G C O O O O G O O O C O O LL ' f0 et CO f0 N OD O N N f0 CO N OD Cr O N N C C C O O C O O O O O O O O O C C O p p l�6 d NIN v V N so h c W If �'7 IA lh In V 1n N O O C O C O O C G O C O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 d co C appCD pep} M N Q �f f- IA N l? (O 1� N 1rA, N 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 th in _ o v N N M d i l • 7 O N N OD lh r N r Ifl N N r H �' 7 p�pppp ��pp r r GO IA N M M N IA V r lA r N O Ln c et c p pp pp ee�� �(pp N n N N fh m NV l'7 N N f0 f0 N tV N _ p N^ (O N M M 11'1 N O N 0 IA r r r N CD N 7 W co R �p pf+� N 0 r {lh fh in O co N N rl� IMA r N -ra �p �p pp _ �p M oli N f0 GD Or 2 IA CO� O O fro ^ INfI x l'7 r r r N N r N r N N � co 10 O N l0 N O N N N fp cli O O �' U U ai C7 3 w U w U E W W 0 J r N t�3 0 Oa) 010 N l0 W EO d c to E lA .4e = N C CD O LL Z d �U N d C w O rca N N M C y o O0. Y c Y n. E (D oo cl 0 E rn w ad E s o 10- d c d l0 O O �.0 N Q 0 02.2 O mUUUi C-5_326 65co(n c c� N o a W rnm c� N N LL N fYp O G07 C .E Y Y C O C NCLt, (7 NCL B O J N S Ll- Z:3_ 0. N C d 0 U 6 L, N COca N Ui 'O C_ co O" 5, LL 7 C (� c Y a2j ejf W y 20vc 0: (neo do`°c� v�E y�,a��y O'a��C0 ow� C C O N O O N V' d O 'O C 'P m L 'fp N O lxO lCp O N 7 p 7 y 0 0 0 0 L L LL _= J J� co N co co H IV 1m m a R 0 Z W IL IL Q cp U1p, f.p1� R eooen� r f+1 g mp� �afy In A mp O m 0 Cc, 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 O C O O O O G O G O O O C O O 0 O O 10 LLV �. -7 a P7 f� p O IA A O! r N N A A f0 IA M r (p r A v V'7 � O 00 C O O O r O 0000 O r r r r CCC O 0 0 0 0 O C 0 O 0 0 0 O O 0 O O p j7 d C d Eat o^ ^ n N C so h C _d W r r r N N �- V N O O O 0 O C O O O C O O O O 0 O O .O co C appCD pep} M N Q �f f- IA N l? (O 1� N 1rA, N 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 th CO C N !n f0 CD N N A O O A of A 0) i y. 7 O N N OD lh r N r Ifl N N r N c p pp pp ee�� �(pp N n N N fh m NV l'7 N N f0 f0 N �W lC N N f7 Of ' IN N O! O M � � w O 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N co 10 O N l0 N O N N N fp cli O O �' N r N r f0 l'7 M N E 0 D. t�3 0 Oa) 010 N G) EO d c to E t r O d O LL Z d �U N d C w O rca N N M C y o O0. Y c Y n. u- CO o a0i�w�cocoLuc �' daa. o `O 1p O N1t0�U N NtJ 'E >>r v)E c c 0 d c d l0 O O �.0 N Q 0 02.2 O mUUUi C-5_326 65co(n IV 1m m a R 0 Z W IL IL Q Changes for City of Kent only Appendix F - Summary of Changes to April 1995 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the April 1995 Plan are summarized here. Maps of the District have been updated to reflect changes. Kentlake High School has been added and Kent Learning Center is now at the Grandview Elementary site. Elementary 27a and Elementary 29 are under construction with opening scheduled for January and September, 1999 respectively. Elementary 30 is in the planning process and planning for Junior High #8 will commence during the 1998-99 school year. Some program changes are reflected in changes to capacity. Capacity for future elementary schools has increased. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement of portables between facilities Permanent and temporary facility costs and average site cost per acre have been adjusted to reflect changes. State match and tax credit factors are updated annually. Student enrollment forecast is updated annually. The student generation factor survey was updated last year to reflect developments added or deleted. Changes reflect no adjustment for occupancy and exclusion of studio apartments per agreement with members of the development community. Survey data is included as Appendix E. Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors include: ITEM Grade/Type FROM 1995 TO 1998 Comments Student Generation Factor Elem 0 516 0 512 See Detail in Plan Single Family (SF) Jr 0.181 0.188 Sr 0.146 0.140 Total 0.843 0.840 Student Generation Factor Elem 0.258 0.235 See detail in Plan Multi -Family (MF) Jr 0.082 0080 Sr 0.069 0.062 Total 0 409 0.377 State Match 55.64% 55.64% Per SPI Boeckh Index (Cost per square foot) $9020 $97.23 Per SPI Average Assessed Valuation SF $136,645 $149,635 Per Puget Sound ESD AV - Average of Condominiums 8 Apts. MF $46,022 $48,992 Per Puget Sound ESD Debt Service Tax Rate $2.24 $297 Per IGng County Assessor General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 5.79% 5.19% Market Rate Impact Fee - Single Family SF $3,675 $3,744 Impact Fee - Multi -Family MF $1,936 $1,888 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan APPENDIX F April, 1998 Page 34 Federal Way School District No. 210 1997/98 Capital Facilities Plan EXHIBITA. FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT 1997/98 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BOARD OF EDUCATION Linda Hendrickson Holly Isaman Joel Marks Ann Murphy Jim Storvick SUPERINTENDENT Thomas J. Vander Ark DEVELOPED BY Jody Putman, Director, Business Services Geri Walker, MIS Specialist FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT #210 1997/98 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................ i INTRODUCTION.................................................. ii -iv SECTION I THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction............................................................. I-1 Inventory of Educational Facilities ............................. I-2 Inventory of Non -Instructional Facilities .................... I-3 Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities .......................... I-4 Needs Forecast - New Facilities .............................. I-5 Six Year Finance Plan .............................................. I-6 SECTION II MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Introduction............................................................. II -1 Map - Elementary Boundaries .................... 11-2 Map - Junior High Boundaries .................... H-3 Map - Senior High Boundaries ................... 11-4 SECTION III SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction............................................................. III -1 Building Capacities ................................................... III -2 Portable Locations ................................................... III4 Student Forecast ...................................................... III -6 Capacity Summaries ................................................. III -8 King County Impact Fee Calculations ....................... III -13 SECTION IV SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 1996/97 PLAN IV -1 i INTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, and the City of Kent Ordinance No. 3260 effective March 1996, the Federal Way School District has updated its 1996/97 Capital Facilities Plan as of April 1998. This Plan has been adopted by King County, the City of Kent and the City of Federal Way and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Auburn and City of Des Moines have not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses the Federal Way School District boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing, jobs, services, culture and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies. Additional plans will be consistent with the six year Capital Facilities Plan. At this time, the Federal Way School District is evaluating the need for and possible timing of future bonds. ii INTRODUCTION (continued) In October of 1997 the District convened a Study and Survey Committee. The Committee is made up of patrons, parents, professional consultants, school staff and central administration staff. The charge of the Committee is divided into four focus areas on a continuum, which will lead to recommendation to the Board of Education. The four focus committees are: 1. Educational Plan Committee 2. Special Education Committee 3. Classroom Standards and Facility Use Committee 4. Future Alternative Committee The Educational Plan Committee prepared an Educational and Technology Plan including information on: District Beliefs, the District Strategic Plan, Technology Plan, State Goals, Performance Standards, Curriculum Matrix and Promotion. This committee developed a recommendation on grade configuration as it relates to District goals. The committee is recommending a change in the Federal Way School District grade configuration to: K-5 Elementary Schools 6 - 8 Middle Schools 9-12 High Schools Educational capacity is not a focus for this group. The recommendations are based on meeting the educational needs of students to support the District vision that "Every student will possess a world class set of skills to become a successful participant in society." The recommendations from this group were sent to the Future Alternatives Committee for further review. The Special Education Committee developed a series of recommendations for facility use as it relates to Special Education. The recommendations are based on consideration of student needs rather than on space for other programs. The committee recommends a commitment of dedicated space to support services staff for testing and therapy services, adequate and secure storage for therapy equipment and available office area for confidential calls and conferences. The support staff includes Speech and Language Pathologists, Occupational Therapists, Physical Therapists and Adaptive Physical Educational Specialist. The committee further recommends an increased capacity be dedicated to ECEAP and Head Start programs to offer services to students and families with full day programs. The need for three additional classes and one portable over the next five years is forecast for these students. Additionally the committee forecasts a need for one or more classrooms dedicated to pre-school in the next five years. Hi Introduction (continued) Other committee recommendations are to add one more class of Integrated Kindergarten and First Grade over the next five years, add one more SBD (Severe Behavioral Disordered) within five years and finally that space is provided for the services the school has selected to provide for the Special Education population such as Resource Rooms. The Future Alternatives Committee will consider these recommendations. The facility recommendations of this committee and forecast of increased need are footnoted in the formula for future capacity needs in the 1997/98 Capital Facilities Plan. ECEAP, Head Start and Pre -School are not a part of the district student population forecast, although the district does provide facilities and services to these programs. The Classroom Standards and Facility Use Committee is tasked to examine all facilities to determine the ability to meet the educational programs of the Federal Way School District for the next ten years. A part of the process is to develop a target population for each building. The committee is establishing a capacity at each building that meets the educational needs of current programs. The committee studied projections for five years to identify where capacity would not be sufficient for projected enrollment. The capacities established by this committee form the basis of the capacity analysis in the 1997/98 Capital Facilities Plan. Additionally the committee studied community use of the Federal Way Schools and reviewed the format for Building Condition Evaluations. The final committee, which will formulate the Board Recommendations, is the Future Alternatives Committee. This committee is studying the reports from the other three groups to ascertain how the recommendations will meet the District Strategic Plan and Grade Span expectations. The committee will consider the impact of school calendar, schedules, class size, technology, the impact of special education and day care. They will also examine the impact of Choice Schools, extended day and extended year concepts, Running Start and transportation issues. The outcome of this study will be a recommendation to develop a District alternative configuration plan. The committee expects to bring a recommendation to the Board of Education in May of 1998. The Federal Way School District Board of Education will review the recommendations of the Future Alternative Committee. If the Board adopts a new configuration, the capacity analysis of the Capital Facilities Plan will be updated. On January 13, 1997 the Board of Education adopted a ten-year Real Estate Plan. This plan deals with long-term use of current land and the acquisition of additional land to meet student population projections in the 20 -year planning window. The plan recommends surplusing land that is not deemed suitable for school construction for any reason, and the purchase of one additional elementary site. The District is currently reviewing options for the purchase of this additional site. iv SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for the Federal Way School District #210. This is followed by a Financial Plan which shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and update modernization needs listed. I-1 INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Adelaide 1635 SW 304th Street Federal Way 98023 Brigadoon 3601 SW 336th Street Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 298th Street Auburn 98001 Enterprise 35101 5th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Green Gables 32607 47th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lake Grove 303 SW 308th Street Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35675 32nd Avenue S Auburn 98001 Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Road Federal Way 98003 Meredith 10 5830 S 300th Street Auburn 98001 Mirror Lake 625 S 314th Street Federal Way 98003 Nautilus 1000 S 289th Street Federal Way 98003 Olympic View 2626 SW 327th Street Federal Way 98023 Panther Lake 34424 1st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368th Street Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 34600 12th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Silver Lake 1310 SW 325th Place Federal Way 98023 Star Lake 4014 S 270th Street Kent 98032 Sunnycrest 24629 42nd Avenue S Kent 98032 Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42nd Avenue S Auburn 98001 Wildwood 2405 S 300th Street Federal Way 98003 Woodmont 26454 16th Avenue S. Des Moines 98198 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Illahee 36001 1st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Kilo 4400 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 314th Street Federal Way 98023 Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Road Federal Way 98003 Saghalie 33914 19th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Totem 26630 40th Avenue S Kent 98032 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Decatur 2800 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 30611 16th Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288th Street Auburn 98001 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS Merit School 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Harry S. Truman High School 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 I-2 CURRENT INVENTORY NON -INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Developed Property Administrative Building MOT Site Central Kitchen Federal Way Memorial Field Undeveloped Property 31405 18th Avenue S 1066 S 320th Street 1344 S 308th Street 1300 S 308th Street Site # Location 9 27th Avenue SW & Dash Point Road 23 SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW 35 S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S 40 E of 10th Avenue SW Between SW 334th & SW 335th Streets 63 E of 47th Avenue SW & SW 314th Place 71 S 344th Street & 46th Avenue S 72 36600 block of Pacific Highway S 84 3737 S 360th Street 96 S 308th Street & 14th Avenue S Notes: Federal Way 98003 Federal Way 98003 Federal Way 98003 Federal Way 98003 Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. I-3 NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS Truman High School Modernization with (2) expansion Purchase and Relocate Interim Capacity (2) Portables Notes: (1) Anticipated source of funds is state matching funds, future bond issues or non -voted debt issues. A school district is entitled to issue non -voted debt up to 3/8 of 1% of the assessed valuation of the district. (2) Anticipated source of funds is state matching funds, Impact Fees, future bond issues or non -voted debt issues. I-4 NEEDS FORECAST - NEW FACILITIES NEW FACII.TTY LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS MOT Site 1 Unknown N/A Elementary Site Acquisition Unknown 2 New Elementary School Unknown 2 Notes: (1) Construction of Maintenance, Operations and Transportation (MOT) site is dependent on sale of current MOT site. (2) Anticipated source of funds is state matching funds, Impact Fees, future bond issues or non -voted debt issues. I-5 r - FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT #210-1997/98CAPITAL FACILITIES PL Six Year Finance Plan Secured Funding Sources 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Total Revenue pact Fees (1) d Fund Sala (7) 5700,000 523,754 $723,7 d Sale Funds (2) $2,225,000 $1,791,832 $788,028 5250,000 $68,191 55,123,051 tate Match Funds (3) $4,950,600 $1,105,000 $811,898 $6,867,498 OTAL 57,175,600 53,596,832 51,623,680 5250,000 568,191 50 S12,714�Q1 Unsecured FundingSources 1998 tate Match Funds (6) 54,800, and or Levy Funds (4) $15,000.004 d Fund Sala (7) $1.000.000 P� Fees (5) 51,295,13 TAL S22,o95,133 NEW SCHOOIS 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 1 2003 Total Cost ew Elementary Site (11) $600,000 ewElementarySchool $6,300,000 $4,200,000 $10,500, MODERNI7ATION AND EXPANSION nrmanSenior Mgh(Alternative) 53,233,680 $2,155,787 $5,389,46 TEMPORARY FACILITIES ortables (8) $1,122,624 $623,680 $561,312 $2,307,61 ederal Way Academy (10) $374,208 OTHER Safety Improvements (9) $4.825,600 54,825. aeihties Departrnent 5250,000 5250,000 5250,000 $250,000 $250,000 5250,000 51,500, ethnology System Improvements Library System $500,000 $650,000 $650,000 $1,800, 04 ethnology System Improvements MIS Project $1,600,000 5600.000 5100.000 52,300, OTAL NATCC. 57,175,600 53,596,632 51,623,680 S250,000 S10,344,992 $6,605,787 528,622,683 1 These fees are cunvritly bemg held in a King County and a City of Federal Way impact fee account, and will be available for use by the Distnct for system improvements 2 These finds come from venous sales of land and are set aside for estimated expenditures. 3. Guaranteed state match reimbursements 4 These funds, if secured, wdl be used for future projects 5. These are projected fees based upon known residential developments in the Distnct over the next sic years. 6 These funds are projected state matching funds. 7 These finds are projected land sale income. 8 These fees represent the coat of moving and siting existing portables. The District may choose to purchase new portables in the yens shown This estunate may also include the cost of purchasing these portables 9. These projects have been approved by the Board ofDrectom and cover most schools. These projects do not increase capacity 10 Federal Way Academy is a junior high program which will increase capacity at ane juruor high site 11. This site is larger than 10 acres Ts 98 sw" sm rar I-6 SECTION H - MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES The Federal Way School District (the District) has twenty-three elementary schools (grades K-6), six junior high schools (grades 7-9), three senior high schools (grades 10-12) and two alternative schools (grades 7-12) for the 1997/98 school year. On April 20, 1996 the Federal Way School District Board of Education adopted the boundaries for these schools. The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school for each grade level (the alternative schools, Harry S. Truman High School and Merit School, serve students from throughout the District). The identified boundaries are reviewed annually. Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs which affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas. The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School Districts are different. If the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single development. ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BOUNDARIES TT -7 Junior High School Boundaries II -3 Senior High School Boundaries TT -4 SECTION III - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities - The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast - 1998 through 2003 Capacity Summaries King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi Family Units Building Capacities This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. The District has identified a Building Program Capacity for each of the schools in the District. This Full Time Equivalent (FTE) capacity is based on: the number of classrooms available in each school any special requirements at each school the contracted class load by grade level In general, the District's current standard provides that the average class size for a standard classroom for grade K is 24 students, for grade 1-6 is 26 students, grades 7-12 is 25 students, Gate classrooms are 25 students, individual education programs classrooms are 15 students, and special education classrooms are 12 students. This size is determined based upon current ratios and trends as well as the classroom physical size. Educational Program Capacities change every year. This analysis is for the 1997/98 school year. The capacity of an individual school could and does change at any time depending on program changes which may require additional space. ,.fes III -2 FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT #210 -1997/98 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN - - BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITIES ELEMENTARY BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY Adelaide 488 Briadoon 528 Camelot 374 Enterprise 516 Green Gables 502 Lake Dolloff 512 Lake Grove 476 Lakeland 488 Mark Twain 503 Meredith Hill 502 Mirror Lake 398 Nautilus 568 Olympic View 449 Panther Lake 514 Rainier View 476 Sherwood Forest 550 Silver Lake 528 Star Lake 502 Sunnycrest 462 Twin Lakes 502 Valhalla 494 Wildwood 428 Woodmont 442 1998 T TAT 11,202 Elementary Average I487 Notes: JUNIOR HIGH BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY Illahee 821 Kilo 854 Lakota 741 Saca'awea 828 Sa halie 768 Totem 709 1998 TOTAL 4,721 Junior High Average 787 SENIOR HIGH BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY Decatur 1,121 Federal Way 1,308 Thomas Jefferson 1,266 1998 TOTAL 3,695 Senior High Average 1,232 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY Merit School Truman High School 194 1998 TOTAL 210 Elementary program capacities are based on the number of teaching stations in the building, contracted class size, and special use classrooms in place during the 96/97 school year. All available instructional space is calculated. Secondary program capacities are based on peak loading. The calculation is based on 25 students per available teaching stations. Capacities were calculated by the Study and Survey Committee. C -PH III -3 Portable Locations The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students until permanent facilities can be built or boundary adjustments can be made. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either moved to another school for an interim classroom, or used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. It is the practice and philosophy of the Federal Way School District that portables are not acceptable as permanent facilities. The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for temporary educational facilities by the Federal Way School District. III -4 FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT #210 -1997/98 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS PORTABLES LOCATED AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS PORTABLES LOCATED AT JUNIOR HIGHS VCrMUCnONAL NON Q mucnONAL Adelaide 1 1 Briadoon 1 1 Camelot 1 4 Enterprise * 1 2 Green Gables 4 Lake Dolloff1 5 Lake Grove 2 Lakeland * i 3 Mark Twain * 3 Meredith Hill Mirror Lake 1 1 auti us Olympic View 2 Panther Lake 3 Rainier View 2 Sherwood Forest 3 Silver Lake 4 Star Lake 4 Sunn crest Twin Lakes 2 1 Valhalla Wildwood 4 Woodmont 1 1 TOTALVOTAL 36 4 PORTABLES LOCATED AT JUNIOR HIGHS * Additional portables are ordered, but not yet in place: Enterprise 1 Portable Lakeland 1 Portable Maris Twain 1 Portable Saghalie 2 Portables parts III -5 PORTABLES LOCATED AT SENIOR HIGHS RUMUMONAL NON Mimucncw"L Illahee 3 1 Kilo 3 1 Lakota 2 4 Sacaiawea 12 1 2 Saghalie * 4 Totem 5 TOTAL 17 3 * Additional portables are ordered, but not yet in place: Enterprise 1 Portable Lakeland 1 Portable Maris Twain 1 Portable Saghalie 2 Portables parts III -5 PORTABLES LOCATED AT SENIOR HIGHS PORTABLES LOCATED AT SUPPORT FACILITIES Science & Testing K NON vwmucnoNAL VemucnoNAL Decatur 4 Federal Way 1 Thomas Jefferson 1 Truman/Merit 7 1 T TAL 4 T TAL 12 1 PORTABLES LOCATED AT SUPPORT FACILITIES Science & Testing K 1 5 -Mile Lake 1 MOT 1 Clothing Bank 1 T TAL 4 HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES (NOT DISTRICT OWNED) Mirror Lake 1 Mier—w-FoU Forest 1 Total 2 Student Forecast The District has several methods available to forecast the number of students it anticipates in future years. The District is using a program called Enrollment Master for base line grade level forecast and a statistical trend method for comparison. Enrollment Master is a statistical model that uses feeder school information, cohort survival, and historical student data to forecast future student enrollment. The District also continues to use the MicroSam software. The District uses these software packages to forecast for a maximum of six years. The District also prepares long range forecasting using different models. These projections reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management of the State of Washington. III -6 FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT #210 -1997/98 CAPTIAL FACILITIES PLAN FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT FORECAST Actual 1997 1998 1 1999 1 2000 1 2001 1 2002 1 2003 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS K 1 ............................................................................ 2 ............................................................................ 3 ............................................................................ 4 ............................................................................ 5 ..................... 6 1,726 1,691 1,815 1,796 1,704 1,630 ..................._......_............. 1 1,600 1,733 1,784 1,692 1,836 1,806 1,713 1,6311 1,756 1,778 1,800 1,823 1,845 1,791 1,815 1,838 1,861 1,884 1,785 1,792 1,816 1,839 1,862 1,713 1,807 1,814 1,838 1,862 1,847 1,723 1,818 1,825 1,849 1,817 1,858 1,733 1,829 1,836 1,714 1,8181 1,859 1,743 1,830 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 7 ............................................................................ 8 ............................................................................ 9 1,694 1,692 1,758 1,641 1,690 1,709 1,672 1,758 1,864 1,906 1,778 1,636 1,667 1,752 1,858 1,900 1,706 1,652 1,683 1,769 1,876 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 10 .... ................. ............................._ 11 .. ................... .........................................._......... 12 1,567 1,454 1,351 1,732 ...................... 1,502 1,373 1,683 1,680 1,627 1,657 1,742 1,660 1,614 1,611 1,560 1,589 1,419 1,568 1,525 1,522 1,474 ENROLLMENT - HEADCOUNT SUMMARY Elem (HC) 11,962 12,195 12,423 12,591 12,678 12,758 12,968 Jr Hi&h 5,144 5,0405,014 _ 5,014 5,077 _ 5,299 . 5,533 5,554 _ Sr High 4,372 4,607 4,762 4,862 4,763 4,739 4,805 TOTAL (HC) 21,478 21,842 22,1991 22,5301 22,7401 23,030 23,327 ENROLLMENT - FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) SUMMARY Elem (FTE) 11,099 11,329 11,545 11,702 11,778 11,847 12,046 Jr Hi&h -5,144 5,040 _ 5,014 5,077 5,299 5,533 5,554 Sr High 4,372 4,607 4,762 4,862 4,763 4,739 4,805 TOTAL (FPE) 20,6151 20,9761 21,3211 21,641 21,840 22,1191 22,405 Tstkd mum IQ27 STT AM 111-7 Capacity Summaries All Grades, Elementary, Junior High, and Senior High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the district to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, junior high, and senior high levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year. III -8 FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT #210 -1997/98 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - ALL GRADES ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 20,615 120,976 121,321 121,641 121,840 1 22,119 122,405 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) Actual - - Projected - - CAPACITY 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 BUILDING PROGRAM (1,741) 2,250 (1,661) 2,475 CAPACITY 838 826 CAPACITY 19,828 19,828 19,802 19,926 19,900 19,974 20,458 Add or subtract changes to capacity 2. Federal Way Academy$ 3. Special Education Changes (26) (26) (26) (26):. 26).-*. .- (26).:* , 4. New Elementary 510'..'. 5. Truman High modernization and expansion IOb Adjusted Program Capacity i 19,828 19,802 119,926 1 19,900 119,974 1 20,458 120,458 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 20,615 120,976 121,321 121,641 121,840 1 22,119 122,405 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) 1,625 1,625 375 2,000 250 2,250 1(1,866) 2,250 225 1(1,9471) PROGRAM CAPACITY (787) (1,174) (1,395) (1,741) 2,250 (1,661) 2,475 DTiT nrATAAT T VAPArl I V Current Portable Capacity Add new portable capacity 1,625 1,625 375 2,000 250 2,250 2,250 2,250 225 2,475 Adjusted Portable Capacity 1,625 2,000 2,250 2,250 2,250 2,475 2,475 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE 1 1 CAPACITY 838 826 855 509 384 814 528 NOTES: 1. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based upon actual population needs. 2. Federal Way Academy junior high program will increase capacity at one Junior High Site 3. Add Programs - 3 ECEAP, 1 SBD (Severely Behavioral Disordered) and 1 Pre -School Program 4. New Elementary 5. Truman High School modernization and expansion cSPV-A 514" 342 PM FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT #210 -1997/98 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS CAPACITY Actual - - Projected - - 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY 11,202 11,202 11,202 11,176 11,150 11,124 11,608 2. Special Education Changes 3. New Elementary School : 373 (26) (;6) ( .(26)' (26) - Adjusted Program Capacity 1 11,202 111,202 11,176 j 11,150 11,124 11,608 11,582 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 1 11,099 111,329 111,545 1 11,702 111,778 11,84712,046 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) 900 900 925 925 925 1 1 PROGRAM CAPACITY 1 103 (127) 1 (369) 1 (552) 1 (654) (239) (464) RTiT.nrATART.F. (`APArYTY W Current Portable Capacity 900 900 925 925 925 925 850 Add/Subtract portable capacity Move to Senior High 1,003 (50) 556 373 271 611 386 4. Add per inventory 75 Move to Junior Hi (75) Adjusted Portable Capacity 1 900 1 92 1 925 1 925 1 925 1 850 1 850 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 1,003 799 556 373 271 611 386 NOTES: 1. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based upon actual population needs. 2. Add Programs 3 ECEAP, 1 SBD(Severely Behavioral Disordered) and 1 Pre -School Program 3. New Elementary School 4. Portables ordered but not yet placed at Enterprise, Lakeland and Mark Twain CAP—" 514(n 3:22 PM III -10 FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT #210 -1997/98 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS CAPACITY Actual - - Projected - - 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY 4,721 4,721 4,721 4,871 4,871 4,871 4,871 2. Federal Way Academy 282 219 150 75 42 Adjusted Portable Capacity 425 Adjusted Program Capacity 4,721 4,721 4,871 4,871 4,871 4,871 4,871 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 5,144 1 5,040 15,014 1 5,077 15,299 1 5,533 1 5,554 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) 425 425 425 1 1 1 1 PROGRAM CAPACITY 1 (423) 1 (319) 1 (143) (206) (428) (662) (683) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY Current Portable Capacity 425 425 425 425 425 425 725 Add/Subtract portable capacity 225 Add From Elementary 2 106 282 219 (3) 75 42 Adjusted Portable Capacity 425 425 1 425 425 1 425 1 725 725 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 2 106 282 219 (3) 63 42 NOTES: Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based upon actual population needs. 2. Federal Way Academy junior high program will increase capacity atone junior high site. Y4" 3.22 PM FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT #210 -1997/98 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 4,372 1 4,607 14,862 1 4,763 14,862 1 4,739 14,8075 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) Actual - - Projected - - CAPACTTY 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 BUILDING PROGRAM (858) (957) (734) (800) Move from Elementary (167) 50 CAPACITY 3,905 3,905 3,905 3,905 3,905 3,905 4,005 Add or subtract changes in 975 975 975 975 capacity due to construction or remodel 2. Truman High modernization and expansion 100 - Adjusted Program Capacity 3,905 3,905 3,905 3,905 3,905 4,005 4,005 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 4,372 1 4,607 14,862 1 4,763 14,862 1 4,739 14,8075 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) 300 300 725 975 975 975 975 PROGRAM CAPACITY (467) (702) (957) (858) (957) (734) (800) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY Current Portable Capacity 300 300 725 975 975 975 975 Add new portable capacity 375 250 1 Move from Elementary (167) 50 18 117 18 241 175 Adjusted Portable Capacity 300 725 975 975 975 975 975 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE 1 CAPACITY (167) 23 18 117 18 241 175 NOTES: 1. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based upon actual population needs. 2. Truman High School modernization and expansion cv4-e VAM 3M PM III -12 King County, the City of Federal Way, and the City of Kent Impact Fee Calculations Single and Multi -Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was also adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi -family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that district. - STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS The Federal Way School District student generation factor was determined separately for single family units and multi -family units. The factors used in the 1997/98 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single family units and multi -family units, which were constructed in the last five (5) years. - IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Following the calculations for the student generation factor is a copy of the Impact Fee Calculation for single family and multi -family units based on King County Code 21A and the Growth Management Act. Single Family Units $2gg3 Multi -Family Units $875• Student Generation Factors - For page numbering W) M am N r M O r - m y to M O O t7D M r W to a0 +� V M to O ao t0 M t>D uo co O to m F" li M M I` N I` O w IV I- W) h t0 M to IT I` O Cf to t7 G d C C t7 t7 G ti o = O M O CO to to O M O CO cm O M O N O P. O O t0 O _ M O M O 00 0 to O M to I` O M O I. — 0 0—'V tD O M to V 0 M to O V W O OO M I- M I- W N O Q I'- V- C IOL O M O -W v N t0 O r O d y O y c c o c o c c o I 0 0 t rnMOOocoMvo.- - <T O O M to o to 0 W V M r C y � O rNoaa O N- O G � o -� o 0 o c o 0 0 o c c tnr-a0 w atnwM �. V W O O - N O v N to w O v O to O to M M r C O o v w O w m O O V N M to to W O w to to O cc et (O to r (O N f` M O ca E.�M to0NMI�vMtomto c dl f/1 W� v v N v N V V O M W O C C C C C C t7 C C a W .. s VD t''» CLC)O') 000 w E Z2 Cd ar O O m 0 Q O C d d N g O I` O O O f0 to N t0 tL 'O Cl) to C .r a z 3 y c:tCw7O 0 U U A C C t0 O M .- O CO tl7 E E F E E N Q y 0 y z W g � a x w Uz •. y CA o E cm ME C U. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 E - z�� w A w a O '^ E c IL � NO O t7f � to O� fD N O E y y N M w t0 N W v v w M co Z C O y y O z O A W a o y V �- 9 0 W �, u 3 .6 m U t C H C 0" � 0 �j 0 O E m = to m y y �mIL- UUCL.a lull- � FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT #210 -1997/98 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE School Site Acquisition Cost: Student Student Facility Cost / Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ A --- -- A- ren�r;ty CFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary Jr High Sr High 14.00$25,000 30.17.. ..............0.00. _.._ ._..... .............. �O. 510 78_7 1,232 .385 _ ._ . .117.-.. 106 .108_ 037 .036 $264 $74 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL $264 $74 School Construction Cost: % Perm Fac./ Facility Facility Total S Ft Cost Ca aci Elementary Jr High *Sr High * Senior Hi Student Student Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ C>~ o rtFR SFR MFR If — 97.34% o ................... 97.45 /0 97.45/0 gh $10,500,000 $1,833152 _ — 510 ........._.............—. 787 100 .385 .117 .106 .108 _ 037 .036 $7,718 $2,160 $0 $0 $1,901 $648 is Truman Aletnative School Grades 9-12 TOTAL $9,618 2,809 Temporary Facility Cost: % Temp Fac. Facility Facility Total So Ft Cost Size Elementary Jr High Sr High Student Student Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ CFR MFR SFR MFR 2.66% o.. 2.66%1 a....- 2.66 /o $62,368 ._...........................-........_................... $62,368 ..........................._................... $62,368 25 25 ....................................................................... 25 .385 ......................... .117 .106 .108 ......................... .037 .036 $26 $7 $8 $2 $7 $2 TOTAL $40 $12 State Matching Credit Calculation: Boeck Cost/ Sq. Ft. Elementary Jr High Sr High Student Student State Factor Factor AA,atrh CFR MFR Cost/ Cost/ SFR MFR — - - $97.23 $97.23 $97.23 -------- 80 0 120 - ---- 59.89% 59.89% 59.89 /o .385 .117 .106 .108 M.037 .036 $1,794 $502 $0 $0 $743 $254 Total $2,537 $756 Tax Payment Credit Calculation Average Assessed Value (April 98) Capital Bond Interest Rate (April 98) Net Present Value of Average Dwelling Years Amortized Property Tax Levy Rate Present Value of Revenue Stream Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost Permanent Facility Cost Temporary Facility Cost State Match Credit Tax Payment Credit Sub -Total 50% Local Share IImDact Fee IMPMEIM YAM 221 PM cFR MFR $143:979 $34,641 5.19% $1,101,581 1010 $265,038 $1.47 - $1.47 $1,619 $390 Single Family Multi -Family Residences Residences $264 $74 $9,618 $2,809 $40 $12 ($2,537) ($756) ($1,619) ($390) S5,766 $1,749 $2,883 $875 S2.S83 $875 SECTION IV SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 1997/98 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The 1997/98 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document, based on the 1996/97 Capital Facilities Plan. The changes between the 1996/97 and 1997/98 Plan are listed. SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CURRENT INVENTORY OF NON -INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITES Developed Property Security/Science Kit Center is sold Undeveloped Property Site 98 is sold NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES Facility equity updates have been removed from the needs forecast- existing facilities. NEEDS FORECAST - NEW FACILITIES A new elementary school is added to the needs forecast — new facilities. The Six Year Finance has been rolled forward to reflect 1998/2003 IV -1 SECTION III - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION CAPACITY Changes to capacity between the 1996/97 Capital Facilities Plan and the 1997/98 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page IV -3. PORTABLES The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Changes to portables between the 1996/97 Capital Facilities Plan and the 1997/98 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page IV4. STUDENT FORECAST The Student Forecast now covers 1998 through 2003. The new forecast reflects an increased rate of growth at a decreasing rate observed in the District. CAPACITY SUMMARY The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast. The Board is considering the Federal Way Academy, a program for junior high students that would be sited at an existing junior high site in portables. This program is shown as an increase in capacity in the 1999/2000 school year. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY CODE 21A The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors. The adjustment made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 1996/97 Capital Facilities Plan and the 1997/98 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page IV -5. IV -2 CAPACITY CHANGES FROM 1996/97 TO 1997/98 The Study and Survey Committee did a full inventory of all educational facilities and met with building administrators to discuss program needs. Committee members developed a target capacity for each building. This capacity was calculated using baseline instructional space requirements to meet current and proposed educational plans. The capacities shown represent actual program capacities as they exist at the time of publishing. IV -3 PORTABLE CHANGES FROM 1996/97 to 1997/98 The numbers of portables in the 1996/97 Capital Facilities Plan indicated number of portable structures at each site. The 1997/98 Capital Facilities Plan indicates the number of portable classrooms available at each site. ELEMENTARY Adelaide — One new portable Wildwood — Two from Sherwood Forest Elementary SECONDARY Totem — One from Camelot Elementary IV -4 IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 1996/97 TO 1997/98 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in student Generation factors between the 1996/97 Capital Facilities Plan and the 997/98 Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age of the developments. IMPACT FEE Item From/To Comment Elementary Site Cost $4,500. To Current negotiated prices $25,000. Percent of Permanent Facilities 97.45 % to Purchase of additional portable facilities 97.34% Percent Temporary Facilities 2.55%to 2.66% Temporary Facility Cost $92,361 to Updated cost of most recently $62,368 purchased portable (Adelaide Elementary) Boeck Cost/Sq Ft $94.27 to Change per SPI $97.23 State Match 58.92% to Change per SPI 59.89% Average Assessed Value SFR - Per Puget Sound Educational Service $136,500 to District (ESD 121) $143,979. MFR - $41,846 to $34,641. Capital Bond Interest Rate 5.81% to Market Rate 5.19% Property Tax Levy Rate $1.55to $1.47 Per King County IV -5