HomeMy WebLinkAbout2905Ordinance No. 2905
(Amending or Repealing Ordinances)
CFN=131 - Zoning Codes
Passed - 2/20/1990
Amending KCC 15.08.100
Amended
by Ord.
3409
Amended
by
Ord.
3439
Amended
by
Ord.
3521 (Sec. 15.08.100(E))
Amended
by
Ord.
3600
Amended
by
Ord.
3665 (Sec. 15.08.100(C))
Amended
by
Ord.
4003
ORDINANCE NO.�
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent,
Washington, resulting from the Planning
Department Housing Element Work Program,
amending Kent City Zoning Code 15.08.100
relating to Non -conforming Development
Regulations.
WHEREAS, the Kent City Council, by Resolution 1123,
i' evidenced its desire to achieve reduction in the density of
multifamily housing through revisions to Kent's Comprehensive Plan
and Zoning Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution 1172, directed
the Planning Department to conduct a study and proposed update of
the housing element of the City's Comprehensive Plan, including an
I'
area by area analysis of multifamily density for East Hill, West
Hill and Valley Floor Planning Areas; and
!I
WHEREAS, the Council directed that the results of said
area -wide study are to be proposed for implementation through text
and/or map zoning amendments to be presented to the Council; and
WHEREAS, the Council had directed that the Planning
Department work with the City Council to develop a work program
for the area by area analysis; and
WHEREAS, Kent City Code 2.32.050 (Ordinance 2469,
Section 1) authorizes the Planning Commission to hear and make
recommendations to the City Council on Zoning Text amendments; a
WHEREAS, public notice and opportunity for input on the
Work Program process, procedure and results has been of the
highest priority to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, amendments to the Kent City Zoning Text creati
a new residential zone R1-5.0, amending Section 15.04.020 of the
Kent City Code, were recommended to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of Kent City
Code 2.32.050 and the provisions of 35A.63.100(2), public hearing
were held before the Planning Commission of the City of Kent on
August 28, September 18, October 16, November 20 and November 27,
1989 to consider the proposed amendments; and
WHEREAS, after the final hearing of the Planning
Commission and its final deliberations, the Planning Commission's
Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and recommendations for
proposed amendments to the Kent Zoning Code Text concerning the
R1-5.0 zone were issued on December 11, 1989; and
WHEREAS, the Kent City Council considered the Findings o
Fact, Conclusions of Law and recommendations of the Planning
Commission concerning the R1-5.0 zoning code text amendments at a
public meeting on January 30, 1990; and
WHEREAS, there exist approximately 42 lots within areas
which the Planning Commission has recommended for the R1-5.0
designation that meet the lot size requirement, but do not meet
other requirements of the proposed zoning designation; and
WHEREAS, under the proposed R1-5.0 zoning designation
approximately 33 single family homes could be developed on these
same 42 lots; and
WHEREAS, one facet of the Housing Element Work Plan is
encourage single family housing within the City of Kent; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor has recommended an amendment to the
nonconforming development regulations of the Kent City Zoning Cod
(Section 15.08.100), relating to the proposed R1-5.0 zone, to
maximize the number of lots eligible for development as single
family housing, in advancement of the legislative policy of the
Housing Element Work Program promoting single family housing; NOW
THEREFORE,
- 2 -
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Kent City Zoning Code 15.08.100 is
amended as follows:
15.08.100. NONCONFORMING DEVELOPMENT.
A. Purpose. The intent and purpose of these provisio
are:
1. To assure reasonable opportunity for use of
legally created lots which do not meet current minimum
requirements for the district in which they are located.
2. To assure reasonable opportunity for use,
maintenance, and improvement of legally constructed buildings,
structures, and site development features which do not comply wi
current minimum requirements for the district in which they are
located.
3. To assure reasonable opportunity for
continuation of legally established uses which do not conform to
use regulations for the district in which they are located.
4. Encourage the eventual replacement of
nonconforming uses having potentially undesirable impacts on
conforming uses.
5. Encourage the eventual upgrading of
nonconforming buildings, structures, and site development features
which do not comply with current minimum requirements for the
district in which they are located.
B. Applicability. Nonconforming uses, structures, lots
or signs are not favored by law and this code and it is to avoid
injustice that this code accepts such elements. To benefit from
the protection given to nonconforming development, such use,
structure, lot or sign must have been lawfully established prior
to June 20, 1973 or pursuant to a county resolution in effect at
- 3 -
!the time of annexation which rendered it nonconforming. This
section distinguishes between and defines nonconforming uses,
!major nonconforming buildings/structures, minor nonconforming
;buildings/structures, nonconforming lots of record, and
'nonconforming signs. Different requirements are made applicable
;to each of these categories. The degree of restriction made
'applicable to each separate category is dependent upon the degree
Ito which that category of nonconformance is a nuisance or
incompatible with the purpose and requirements of this code.
I
C. Nonconforming Uses.
1. Restrictions. Regulations applicable to
nonconforming uses are in addition to regulations applicable to
nonconforming structures, lots and signs, and in the event of any
conflict the most restrictive provision shall apply.
2. Expansion of nonconforming uses. No existing
building, structure, or land devoted to a nonconforming use shall
be expanded, enlarged, extended, reconstructed, intensified, or
structurally altered unless the use thereof is changed to a use
permitted in the district in which such building/structure, or
land is located except as follows:
a. When authorized by Conditional Use Permit,
a nonconforming use may be expanded, enlarged, extended,
reconstructed, intensified, or structurally altered on land under l'
the same ownership as of January 1, 1984.
3. Change of nonconforming use. When authorized
i
by the Planning Director, a nonconforming use may be changed to a
I
use of a like or more restrictive nature.
4. Extension of nonconforming uses. When
authorized by the Planning Director, a nonconforming use may be
extended throughout those parts of a building which were
manifestly designed or arranged for such use prior to the date
when such use of such building became nonconforming if no
structural alterations except those required by law are made
therein.
- 4 -
i
5. Discontinuance of nonconforming uses. When a
nonconforming use of land or a nonconforming use of all or part of
a structure is discontinued or abandoned for a period of six (6)
imonths, such use shall not be resumed, not withstanding any
reserved intent not to abandon such use. Normal, seasonal
cessation of use, or temporary discontinuance for purposes of
maintenance or improvements shall not be included in determination)
of the six month period of discontinuance.
6. Reversion of a nonconforming use. If a
nonconforming use is changed to a permitted use, the nonconforming
use shall not be resumed.
7. Residential exception to nonconforming use
status. Legally established residential uses located in any
residential zoning district and in existence as of January 1, 1984
shall not be deemed nonconforming in terms of density provisions
and shall be a legal use.
D. Nonconforming Buildings/Structures.
1. Restrictions. Regulations applicable to
nonconforming structures are in addition to regulations applicable
to nonconforming uses, lots and signs and in the event of any
conflict, the most restrictive provisions shall apply.
2. Major nonconforming buildings/structures. No
major nonconforming structure may be expanded, enlarged, extended,
reconstructed, or otherwise structurally altered or changed nor
may any major nonconforming building, structure or lot be occupies
after discontinuance or change in use unless said structure, use
and associated grounds, and development are brought into compli-
ance with use and minimum development standards of the district it
which such structure is located except as follows:
a. Any major nonconforming structure damaged
by fire, flood, explosion, wind, earthquake, war, riot, or other
natural disaster, and where cost of restoration exceeds fifty (50)
percent of the fair market value of the structure at the time of
damage, shall not be restored or reconstructed and used as before
- 5 -
such happening; however, where cost of restoration does not excee
fifty (50) percent of the fair market value of the structure at
the time of damage, the structure may be restored, reconstructed
and used as before, provided that the work be completed within on
(1) year of such happening.
b. Such repairs and maintenance work as
required to keep the structure in sound condition may be made to
major nonconforming structure provided no such structural
alterations shall be made except such as are required by law or
ordinance or authorized by the Planning Director.
3. Minor nonconforming buildings/structures. No
minor nonconforming structure may be expanded, enlarged, extended,
reconstructed, or otherwise structurally altered or changed nor
may any minor nonconforming building, structure or lot be occupied
after discontinuance or change in use unless said structure and
associated grounds, and development are brought into compliance
with the minimum development standards of the district in which
such structure is located, except as follows:
a. Any minor nonconforming structure damaged
by fire, flood, explosion, wind, earthquake, war, riot, or other
natural disaster, and where the cost of restoration exceeds fifty
(50) percent of the fair market value of the structure at the time
of damage, shall not be restored or reconstructed and used as
before such happening; however, where cost of restoration does not
exceed fifty (50) percent of the fair market value of the struc-
ture at the time of damage, it may be restored, reconstructed and
used as before, provided that it be completed within one (1) year
of such happening.
b. Such repairs and maintenance work as
required to keep it in sound condition may be made to a minor
nonconforming structure provided no such structural alterations
shall be made except such as are required by law or ordinance or
authorized by the Planning Director.
4. Planning Director's authority. The Planning
Director may waive specific development standard requirements
- 6 -
and/or impose additional requirements when all the following
criteria are met:
a. owing to special circumstances a literal
enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Code or other land usE
regulatory ordinances of the City will result in unnecessary hard-
ship.
b. The waiver of development requirements is
in harmony with the purpose and intent of City ordinances and the
Comprehensive Plan.
C. The proposed use, building, and
development will function without adverse impact upon adjacent
property, development in the area or the city as a whole.
required.
d. (When) A Conditional Use Permit is not
E. Nonconforming Lots.
1. Restrictions. Regulations applicable to
nonconforming lots are in addition to the regulations applicable
to nonconforming uses, structures and signs, and in the event of
conflict, the most restrictive provisions shall apply.
2. Nonconforming lots of record.
a. Residential districts. In any district it
which single family dwellings are permitted, a single family
dwelling and customary accessory buildings may be erected on any
single lot of record as of June 20, 1973, notwithstanding limita-
tions imposed by other provisions of this code. Such lot must be
in separate ownership and not of continuous frontage with other
lots in the same ownership. This provision shall apply even
though such lot fails to meet the requirements for area and/or
width that are generally applicable in the district, provided that
yard dimensions and requirements other than those applying to arez
and/or width of the lot shall conform to the regulations for the
district in which such lot is located.
- 7 -
i
In all sincrle-family zoning districts,
with the exception of the R1-5.0 zoning district, if two or more
lots or combinations of lots and portions of lots with continuous
frontage in single ownership are of record prior to June 20, 1973,'
and if all or part of the lots do not meet the minimum require-
ments established for lot width and area, the land involved shall
be considered to be an undivided parcel for the purposes of this
code, and no portion of said parcel shall be used or sold in a
manner which diminishes compliance with lot width and area
requirements established by this code, nor shall any division of
any parcel be made which creates a lot with width or area below
the requirements stated in this code.
i
In the R1-5.0 zoning district, if two or
more, single -family -zoned lots or combination of lots and portions�l
of lots with continuous frontage in single ownership are of record
prior to June 20 1973 and if all or part of the lots do not mee
the below -described minimum requirements established for lot
width, lot area, and topography, the land involved shall be
considered to be an undivided parcel for the purposes of this
code, and no portion of said parcel shall be used or sold in a
manner which diminishes compliance with lot width and area
requirements established by this code, nor shall any division of
any parcel be made which creates a lot with width or area below
the requirements stated in this code.
i
Minimum lot area: 4600 square feet
Minimum lot width: 40 feet
Maximum site slope: 15 percent
b. Other districts. In any other district,
permitted building and structures may be constructed on a noncon-
forming lot of record, provided site coverage, yard, landscaping
and off-street parking requirements are met. Such lots must be i
separate ownership and not of continuous frontage with other lots
in the same ownership prior to June 20, 1973 and if all or part o
the lots do not meet the minimum requirements established for lot
width and area, the land involved shall be considered to be an
undivided parcel for the purposes of this code, and no portion of
said parcel shall be used or sold in a manner which diminishes
- 8 -
compliance with lot width and area requirements established by I
this code, nor shall any division of any parcel be made which
creates a lot with width or area below the requirements stated in
this code.
F. Nonconforming Signs.
1. Restrictions. Regulations applicable to
nonconforming signs are in addition to regulations applicable to
nonconforming uses, structures and lots, and in the event of
conflict the most restrictive provisions shall apply.
2. Nonconforming signs.
a. Signs that were legally existing as of
June 20, 1973 that do not conform to these regulations shall be
considered nonconforming signs. Nonconforming signs may not be
moved, relocated, altered or added to without receiving approval
from the Planning Department.
b. No sign permit shall be issued to allow
legal signs on property having an illegal or nonconforming sign
until such time as the nonconforming or illegal sign(s) is
modified to conform to this code.
3. Amortization period of nonconforming signs
a. Abandoned signs. Must be removed within
ninety (90) days.
b. Number and type of signs. The number and
type of allowable signs for each occupancy must conform to the
regulations of this code by January 1, 1988.
Section 2. The City of Kent Zoning Text, is amended to
provide that all references to said Section 15.08.100,
Nonconforming Development Regulation, shall be in conformity with
those changes as set forth in Section 1.
Section 3. The amendments to the Kent City Zoning Code
Text shall be filed with the City Clerk and in the Office of the
- 9 -
Planning Department and made available for public inspection upon
request.
Section 4. Any act consistent with the authority and
prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified
and confirmed.
Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take
effect and be in force thirty (30) days from the time of its fina
passage as provided by law.
DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
I
BRENDA JACBER,TY CITY CLERK
PASSED the day of� , 1990.
APPROVED the day of�� 1990.
PUBLISHED the day of , 1990.
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinanc
No.C;-7 06- , passed by the City Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as herE
indicated.
017t �-f/�EAL)
BRENDA JACOBER, DEPUTY CITY CLI
i
8230-2.90
- 10 -