HomeMy WebLinkAbout766RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City of Kent, Wash-
ington, adopting the 1975 through 1980 revision
to the City of Kent's Six Year Comprehensive Arter-
ial Street Program.
WHEREAS, the City of Kent has, in accordance with
RCW 35.77.010 previously adopted a Six Year Comprehensive Arterial
Street Program, and
WHEREAS, the laws of the State of Washington require
annual revision and review of said Street Program, and
WHEREAS, the City did prepare a revised and extended
Comprehensive Arterial Street Program covering the years 1975
through 1980, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the City Council
on June 17, 1974, after due and proper notice thereof, and
WHEREAS, after said public hearing the Comprehensive
Arterial Street Program, attached hereto as Exhibit A and in-
corporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein was
approved as the official revised and extended Comprehensive Arte-
rial Street Program of the City of Kent for the years 1975 through
1980, NOW, THEREFORE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DO
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Comprehensive Arterial Street Program
for the years 1975 through 1980 attached hereto as Exhibit A and
incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein be
and the same hereby is approved as the Comprehensive Arterial
Street Program for the City of Kent.
-1-
Section 2. The Director of Public Works be and he
hereby is authorized and directed to transmit to the Director
of the State Department of Highways and to the Urban Arterial
Board copies of this Resolution and the appropriate plans.
PASSED at a Regular Council Meeting this 17th day of
June, 1974.
ATTEST:
PROVED AS TO FORM:
~~
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of
No. '7fe0 , passed by the City Council of the City
Washington, the 17th day of June, 1974.
-2-
Resolution
of Kent,
3 4 6 9
0 0 G)
CARD RBliDN co. CITY
TYPE NO. NO. NUMBER
U A 1 1,7 0,6, 1,__5 I -
10 14
0 0
ROUTE STUDY
NUMBER SECT I~
1 n. 7. ·a o, A
1 0 7 0 0 1
1 8 6 1 0 0 A
1 8 6 1 0 0 2
3 9 6 1 lo o A
3 9 6 1 lo o 1
2 9 4 1 0.0 A
2 9 4 1 I() () 1
4 1 0 2 0 0 A
4 1 0 2 o n 1
3 7 0 1 0 0 A
3 7 0 1 lo .o 3
' ' ' ' '
HW'f,FORM 190-001
-1 74
17 1B
~ 8 ...,
STATE en < ...I ROUTE 0
NUMBER
15.1.1
1 s. 1. n
1 1 6 7
1 1 6 7
2 5. 1. 5
2 s. 1 5
2 5 1 5
? r:;, 1' r:;
? 0. (),..,
? (), 0. 1
~ o. 0.
3 o. 0. 1
' '
21
URBAN ARTERIAL DESCRIPTION 766
RELATP~G TO Sl X YEAR CO~lSTRUCTIOtl PROGRM1 (SUPPLB-~EHTAL SECTION) mmm
COUHTI OR CITY HAME ____ ~K~e~n~t~------------------------------------------------------------------
RECORDER -----'"'"-U.""------------------DATE 6-5-74 SHEET 1 of 1 _
47 59 71 74 75
0 0 TERMINI OF ROUTE 0 zgl
LENGTH ""' : ROAD OR STREET HAME c:lo<('
MILES ~~I FROM TO c[
K F. N. T .. K .A .N ,r; T. P Y .. R ,n 11 n 1 0. 4, T, H .A.V.E S E 1l.nTH A V. E ,S ,p n n.R 7 (),
K E N. T. .K .A .N, r: T. f: Y, .R. n 11 , n lc:: p ?. r;,_ ftT ,l--J ~ 'T' 1 1. C. '1' IL A \To ,.-,, •<"' ,,.-, 'n n.R 7 n.
.
C E N T R A T. A V F. N ll F. s 2 2 4. T. H S T W. 1 L L I S S. 'I 0 0.4 7 0 ~
C E N T R A L A V E N U E S M I TH S T W l L L I S S T 0 0.3 8 0 1
•
1 0, .1 T. H .A .V, f: s F. s E. 2 _5. 2 N D S T. S-E .2 .6 0 T. H. .S .T io n • .1 ..., (),
1 n . .1 T. H .A ,V. P s p S E 2, _5. 2 N_ D S T. S E ,2. f. 0 T. H. S .T 0 0.4 2 0.
' ' •
1 0 .1 T. H .A .V f: S. E S E 23.6TH PL S E 2 4 0 T H S T 0 0.2 3 0 1
1 0. 4. T H A.V.E S E ' S E 2 _3. _6__I H_ P L SE 240TH ST 0 0.2 3 0 1
..
s 18QTH ST w VA,LLliY. HWY CARS. ROAD • 0 1
s 1 8 Q T H S T w VALLEY. HWY E. VALLEY HWY 0 1.2 5 0 1
.
4 T H A V. E N U E 212Tf! ST W I L L I S S T 0 2.3 4 0 1
4 T H A V. E N U E H A R R I ~ _Q .N S T S A A S. S T 0 b.3 0 0 ] . . J
• . .
I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I l 1 o I I I l. _ I I _I .
L
mmm URBAN AREA SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM HEARING DATE _;;:6_-=17:.._-...:....7...:....4 __ _
Supplemental Section
CITYOO~~ PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR URBAN ARTERIAL TRUST ACCOUNT FUNDING ADOPTION DATE 6-17-74
I Kent J RESOLUTION NO. _!.7~6~6 ___ _
26 I FUNCTIONAL CLASS OF ARTERIAL CONTROL DATA
( Major I 1 3 6 10 14 18 TOTAL I PROJECT .
w >d COST a. Cl ...1 z > w u 0 . uZ: [LOCAL] 1-a:: co. . -0 CITY ROUTE ~ t; z za: U.A~T.F. 0 ~NO. NO. NO. wo a: ::l w Cl-
ct ::l .... Cl) eta:
I
u a.
..-:-:-)
1. Local Name of Arterial !Length in Miles P.E. I
f-=-----=Kent-Kan_gley Rd. 0.87 K 1 111 7 0615 10 7 3 1 0, 01 0 01 1 • 2 1 o.. I
2. Detailed Location of Project and Termini R/W I
SE 256th St. to 116th Ave. SE K2 1 0 3 1
32
REQUESTED U. A. TRUST FUNDS BY PERIOD
REQUESTED 38 43 48 53 58 63 68 73 77
URBAN 1975 1976 1977
ARTERIAL
TRUST
FUNDS 7/1 1/1 7/1 1/1 7/1 1978 1979 1980 to to to to to
12/31 6/30 12/31 6/30 12/31
P.E .
.1 8.9._ _. _._ _._ 9~ • • • 4 7, • 4 7 • .. • • .. _. • R/W
9 3. • • • • .. 9 3 . . .. • • A. __._
3. Description of Proposed Work Const . Const.
Widen, Gr, Dr, Pave, Ill' Swk, Landscaping, JSd .. 8 4 0.
Tota1
• 7 5 6. • __._ _._ • • . .3 7 8 • .3 7 8 • • • • • • Total
Curb, Undergrounding K4 1.1 5 3. 1.0 3 8. • • 9 5. .. 9 3 • .4 2 s. .4 2 5 • . • • . I l •
3 6 10 14 18 26 32 38 43 48 53 58 63 68 73 77
i 1. Local Name of Arterial I Length in Miles
1 k 71 0 6 1 511 8 6 1111 ~ 0 ~ 01 0 2 P.E. • I Central Avenue 0.38 K 1 18,._
P.E.
• 1 6. • 1 ~ • 2. • 2 • • .. • .. • • • • • 2. Detailed Location of Project and Termini R/W R/W
Intersections @ Smith, Meeker, Gowe, Willis Streets K2 - -. . . • . • .. . • . . • . • • . . . ..
3. Description of Proposed Work Const. Con st.
)tall master-controlled signal system, rebuild 3 &3. , .._l7t_&_ slgnals, install 1 new signal, replace span wire Tot.fl
.1 6 ~-L _. ... 8 o. •. 8,0. . .. .. • • . • . . • Total
w/mast arm, illumination, increase curb radii where K4 .1 9 ~-L__j .lr716. .. '1,2. • 1812. • ,8L2. _ • I I •---"---'-I .. ._,
I _ __§; • I I • • I l •
3 6 -10 14 18 --26 -~~ "" .... .... "" "" u .. uu '"' " 1. Local Name of Arterial 'Length in Miles l I I 11 I
P.E.
K1l I • .._
P.E.
• __._ " .. --"-• .. . . .._ __._ _.._ • .. • .. •-2_ Detailed Location of Project and Termini R/W RjW
K2 I "-• " • .. .J • • -• • • • .. _._ • • • • • • 3. De~cription of Proposed Work Canst. Con st.
~ ' . .
Total
.._ "-.L _. • • -• ._ • • .. -"-• .. .. • • • Total
IK.4 ' .. . . • • . • • . . • • • • . . . . .. . •
UAB-1 REV_ 4/74 (ALL MONEY ENTERED TO 1,000's)
mmm URBAN AREA SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM HEARING DATE 6-17-74
Supplemental Section
:::ITYOM~JVX PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR URBAN ARTERIAL TRUST ACCOUNT FUNDING ADOPTION DATE 6-17-74
Kent RESOLUTION NO. -J.7....u6~6 ___ _
26 32
'UNCTIONAL CLASS OF ARTERIAL CONTROL DATA
Secondary I 1 3 6 10 14 18 TOTAL
PROJECT
REQUESTED U. A. TRUST FUNDS BY PERIOD
REQUESTED 38 43 48 53 58 63 68 73 1i
w ci ..i z >ci COST Cl. > w () 0 . ()~ [LOCAL] 1-a: co. . -0 CITY ROUTE ~ ~z za:: U.A~T.F. c ~NO. NO. NO. wo a: ::J w (!)-
~ ::J LL Ill <ta:: Cl.
} ()
URBAN 1975 1976 1977
ARTERIAL
TRUST
FUNDS 7/1 1/1 7/1 1/1 7/1 1978 1979 1980 to to to to to
12/31 6/30 12/31 6/30 12/31
·. LOCdl Name of Arterial 'Length in Miles P.E.
104th Avenue SE 0.23 'K~1 1 1,7 0 6 1.5 2 9 4 1 2 __Q__Q_l 001 • 8 7 *-
P.E.
78. .. . • . • • .. 13,9. .. 12.0. • 1119, • . • ....
2. Detailed Location of Project and Termini R/W R/W
SE 236th Pl. to SE 240th St. K2 A 2 4. • 122. -• • • -• • _._ _._ 22._ .tl ..... ...JI. _._ ..... ..... _._ ...11..
3. Description of Proposed Work Con st. canst.
Widen, Gr, Dr, Pave, Swk, Curb, Ill' Landscaping, ~ ,.324. Under grounding Tota1
2 9 2 .. • . • -• ...JI. ~ ...... • .1 4 Q.. _._14 ~ _... ~ ...... ..Jl.
Total
----------------K,4 I .4-13,5 A L ..3192. .. I ____L e • !_____l___ • _ _____.____ I I .__ _.._,6_,_h_ .L6ill..t_ .Ln~S• L-e I L e e I I •
3 6 -10 14 18 . -26 --32 38 43 48 53 58 63 68 73 1"
. Local Name of Arterial I Length in Miles
1!r, 71 o 6 1 514 1 o 2 I 2! o o ~ o Q 2
P.E .
s. 180th St. 1. 25 K 1 J 9 o.
P.L
~ Detailed Location of Project and Termini R/W
w. Valley Hwy. to E. Valley Hwy. K2 .2 1 o.
' :! Description of Proposed Work canst.
l ~n, Gr, Dr, Pave, Swk, Curb, Ill' Landscaping, M ,2.0 8 5.
Undergrounding, structure Tot<fl
K,4 2.4 8 5.
3 6 10 14 18 26 32 38 43 48 53 58 63 68 73 7
' i. Local Name of Arterial 'Length in Miles l I I II I P.E.
K,1 I .. . P.E.
• • .. • . • • • • • • • .. • . • • .
2. Detailed Location of Project and Termini R/W R/W
i K2 ' . • • • .. • .. • • • • • • • • • • . .. •
3. Desc.ription of Proposed Work Canst. Canst.
~ • • Tota1
.. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Total
1 IK4 .. • ' • I I • • I _l • • 1 __ j__ •--
_. ,-1-.. • .___. . I •-IL_L___l _It_
L_. L__Ljl_
JAB·1 REV. 4/74 (ALL MONEY ENTERED TO 1,000's)
mmm URBAN AREA SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM HEARING DATE 6-17-74
Supplemental Section
PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR URBAN ARTERIAL TRUST ACCOUNT FUNDING CITY~~
ADOPTION DATE 6-17-74
Kent RESOLUTION NO. ___,7'-"6'-"'-6 __ _
26 32
"'UNCTIONAL CLASS OF ARTERIAL
I CONTROL DATA REQUESTED U. A. TRUST FUNDS BY PERIOD
Collector
l
"TLo-."1 Name of Arterial
4th Avenue
2. Detailed Location of Project and Termini
Harrison St. to Saar St.
3. Description of Proposed Work
Surface
~-
1. Local Name of Arterial
104th Avenue S.E.
i 2. Detailed Location of Project and Termini
I
SE 252nd St. to SE 260th St.
! 3. Description of Proposed Work
'Length in Miles
0.3
Length in Miles
0.42
)en, Gr, Dr, Pave, Swk, Curb, Ill, Landscaping,
Under grounding
11-Local Name of Arterial Length in Miles
2. Detailed Location of Project and Termini
i
13. Des~ription of Proposed Work
----------------------
i.JAB-1 REV. 4/74
1 3
w c. C!l >-w
1-a: co. 0 ~NO. a:
<( ::>
(.)
K1 1 1 7
K2
J$d
K4
3
6 10 14 18 TOTAL
PROJECT
_j >-0 COST z (.) 0 . uZ: [LOCAL] c.j -o CITY ROUTE t;z za: U.A~T.F. NO. NO. z wo ::> w C!l-
u.. (I) <(CZ: c.
REQUESTED 38
URBAN 1975
ARTERIAL
TRUST
FUNDS 7/1
to
12/31
P.E. P.E.
0 6 1,5 3 7 0 1 3 0,0 3 0 0 2 .----.---~ -• _L
R/W R/W
.----"--~-• Con st. const.
. 1 4 • 1 2.1) • 1 2.6
Tota1 Total
.. 1 4,. ---------• 1 2.6 • 1 2.6
32 38
P.E.
R/W
I -~ 9, ~ • 1. __ , •
6 10 14 18 26 ~ .. .:>0
P.E.
• • .. ..
R/W
• • .. ...
con st.
• • ... _.
Total
. • . ..
(ALL MONEY ENTERED TO 1,000's)
43 48 53 58 63 68 73 7
1976 1977
1/1 7/1 1/1 7/1 1978 1979 1980 to to to to
6/30 12/31 6/30 12/31
_._ _._ • • • ' • • -" • • • -" -•
• • . .. . . . • • • .
-" .. • • . • . . • • • • • •
• • .. .. . • . • . • • • •
43 48 53 58 63 68 73 7
. _, I e
..., ~ ..... '"'~-v~ ...... , ..
• -"-.. .. . . •
• • .... .. -"-_._ .. -"-• • .... .. ._ ....
._ •-_ .. _._ _. -"-._ -"-... • • • ... _._
• • . .. • • .. . . .. • . • •
URBAN ARTERIAL BOARD
ARTERIAL INVENTORY
RELATING TO SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM (SUPPLEMENTAL SECTION) ADOPTED BY: / ,_
RESOLUTION NO. 7rot.a ADOPT I ON DATE --,br'---=/,.:::::7 -;..._7..,../.f~
I DENT IF ICA TIOH UB,__
UB )
1. Urban Region
I 7
2. County
3. City Town
() (p I s
.4. Route Humber ~ 7 0 I
5. Section Humber 0 0 3
6. Urban Functional Clauificatlon 3
~
7. Section Length (0.01 Mile) I D lo l3l o I
1-2
3 YB
.4·5
6·9
10-13
14.·16
17
18-21
STRUCTURAL
31. +Ride---------------~
32. +Pavement Condition --------~
33. +Drainage and Crou Section Adequacy---
Condit ion Ride
Good 41-50
Fair 31-40
Poor 21-30
Very Poor 0-20
Str. Cond.
31-40
21-30
11-20
0-10
Dr. Cond .
8-10
5-7
2-4
0·1
ACCIDENTS (Record Data on the basis of a
2 YEAR EXPERIENCE)
0 I 0 ---------------------------35. Property Damage Only (Accidents X 1) __
u~
,
8. Arteria I Home _ _.4:e--l;.:...:f1'--1-...:....A.:...:~;..:e:=;..:N...:U:....:E=--36. Injury Accidents (Accidents X 6) 0 s 4·
9. Begin Termini J-I4R.R!SOA/ Sr. 37. Fatal Accidents (Accidents X 25) 0 0 0
End Termini __ .:::5,...;.,4.:_• A--=-B.L-...;~;;...T.L...L.' ___ .---.--.
TRAFFIC u c
10. Urban Area Number 16111 22-23 I;!,C
39. Existing AADT _____ l......_-t--t--l-+_,~-1
43. Capacity (Hourly)------L--....A.-.,_--f--1---1
' ,,
44. V/C Ratio------------L--.,_-f.....,..j < .:
EXISTING CONDITIONS
GEOMETRICS
17. Humber of Thru Lon .. (Both Directions) __
18. Pavement Width ----------
19. R. Shoulder Width---------
19. L. Shoulder Width---------
20. Total Roadway Width--------
25. Traffic Control 0 None, 1 Fixed, 2 Actuated,
Devic.. 3 Progreu ive, 4 Stop Sign
27 A D I t 1 CBO, 2 Fringe, 3 Out, . rea eve opmen 4 Res, 5 Sub
0 4·
4 0
0 0
0 0
4 0
3
1--
2-
~
45. Present Operating Sp .. d
37-38 49. Transit Bus Route 0. No 1. Yes
39-40 COST, THOUSANDS
41-42 u~
65. Preliminary Engineering (UAB)
43-44 r£ 66. Right of Way (UAB)
45-46
69. Construction (UAB)
54
70. Total (UAB)
56
/0'71. Total Proj. Cost (UAB +Local)
CAPACITY DATA FOR CONTROLLED INTERSECTION
•
37
1 3 4 6 10 14 ,.:3:.;:2_.,..,. _ __,
ff;® ® ® ® ®
ci w ow
0::0.. 0:: co. CITY ROUTE SECT. BLANK -<>-cO NO. NO. NO. NO.
Ul-0::
:::l
F 1 J 17 OGI5 ~701 0 0 3
ADT
( 1,000)
41 43 45 47
~
PEAK !:::
HR. ~
% "'
0::
0
URBAN
POP.
(1,000)
51525354 5657 59 61 6364
86 87 88 @ .,9~ APPR. %TURNS ~ 1
-WIDTH
<( 2 1 ~ WAY WAY ~ '~ Lt. .... STR. ~.toC
Rt.
~,!}I 0 5.$ Q7 • I] L 3 2 0 I Z 20
,4 .B I 0 57 o7 .. I 7 L 3 0 I 2. 2..0 5.4 00
• .
e .
INSTRUCT IONS:
(82) Use 10% if actual not known
·--(83) Use 50% or greater
(84) Use 5% if actual not known
(90) Code: (1) CBD (2) FBD
(93)(94) Use10% if actual not known
(96) Use 65% if actual not known
(97) Use 0.70 .if actua I not known
198) Use 0.85 if actual not known
SECTION
LENGTH
MI.LES
o.o a .. 3 o
67 69 71 74
® ® ® ~
bASE :z: 0:: 0::
:.0: RAV ww oo :.0:0::0 :z: <(I-<C:::ll-<( SPD. w:E ou 0::-wou
.J Cll-.J<( D..:J:<(
Ul MPH II. ~ II.
zr:. '3~ 070 o. a~
7 c. --/ 37 070 0. 8C:
--.. .
-
13) OBD (4) RA (5) SA (99) Code: H =Hone, L =Left, R =Right, B =Both
77
~
Cl
~
:.0:
0::
<(
D.
N
N
I --
u D
D
0
I 3
J a
I 1-
~
w
:.0: u :z: :z:
<( w
.J :::l
Ul a w
"' -
1 -
2 -
3 -
4 -
5 -
60-61
62-63
6.4-65
69-71
72-7.4
75-77
1-2
18-23
30-34
35-37
38-39
73
1-2
47-50
53-56
67-70
73-76
77-80
.
Attach Vicinity Map: (shaw route and location of proposed project.)
,,~~---------------------~-..;_ _________ ......;........;.. _ __;__; ______________ __.
r-·~------------------------------------------------------------------------
• ,>:'0.',: •.
-.:-·· .·
' :.···~' •• -~-: ,, #
URBAl\1 ARTERIAL BOARD
ARTERIAL INVENTORY
RELATING TO SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM (SUPPLEMENTAL SECTION) ADOPTED BY:
RESOLUTION NO. 7~0
ADOPTION DATE to -17-7/f
UB
UB
IDENTIFICATION STRUCTURAL. UB--:-
1. Urban Region-----------r---1-}-1
2. County ----------r---r--+...;/-+...;7--1
3. City Town---------I) G J 5
1-2
3
4·5
6-9
10-13
y~ I 31. +Ride---------------
32. +Pavement Condition ---------:...J
33. +Drainage and Crou Section Adequacy---
4. Route Number 5 r (. I
S. Section Number
6. Urban Functional Classification
14-16
17
7. Section Length (0.01 Mile) lo lo]+lt I 18-21
8. Arterial Nome __ J..;;.0_4_A_, h_A_V_E_-__;_5_E._-_
9. Begin Termini
10. Urban Area Number
SE 20o +!1 -:;-f. End Termini----==----=--~.......:._......;_ ~ 22-23 ~ ~c
Condit ion Ride
Good 41-50
Fair 31-40
Poor 21-30
Very Poor 0-20
Str. Cond.
31-40
21-30
11-20
0-10
Dr. Cond.
8-10
S-7
2·4
0-1
ACCIDENTS (Record Data on the baaia of o
2 YEAR EXPERIENCE)
35. Property Damage Only (Accidents X 1) __
36. Injury Accidents (Accidents X 6) ----
0 I 7
0 7 0
37. Fatal Accident• (Accidents X 25) ____ .._0_...._0__._~--.~
TRAFFIC u c
39. Existing AADT _____ l .... r_::>+_O-t-.... 9-+_o-+...;0-+-o-t
.,
43. Capacity (Hourly)------L.._....__,._..,.__l--1
4.C. V/C Ratio------------.. -'1'--t--1
60-61
62-63
64-65
69-71
72-74
75-77
1-2
18-23
30-34
35-37
38-39 EXISTING CONDITIONS
GEOMETRICS 45. Present Operating Speed---------... --11---1
-
------I I 73 0 2 37 38 49. Transit Bus Route 0. No 1. Yea u_
. . ~~----------------------------------~--~ 17. Number of Thru Lanes (Both Directions)
18. Pavement Width----------2_ ?_ l9-40 COST, THOUSANDS U D 1-.2
D r:; 41-.C2 ~~
19. R. Shoulder Width ---------1---+~/-1 65. Preliminary Engineering (UAB) ---J ;: ·.:3 47-50
19. L. Shoulder Width---------I) 0 43-44
?· 2 45-46
I 54
'2 2 53-56
66. Right of Way (UAB) -------~-+--t--t--f
20. Total Roadway Width --::--=:---:--:----
25. Traffic Control 0 None, 1 ~ ixed, 2 Act~oted,
69. Construction (UABl-------1--+-5-·· +-;J-t-;J-;
~ Devices 3 Progren•ve, 4 Stop S1gn
27 A D I t 1 CBD, 2 Fringe, 3 Out,
::: 9 :~
70. Total (UAB) ----------1--+--+-+-;
• rea eve opmen .C Res, 5 Sub 2. 56 .._.::::..,
1 71. Total Proj. Cost (UAB +Local) ---1----L-~_?..L-(..--J._.?_....
CAPACITY DATA FOR CONTROLLED INTERSECTION
1 3 4 6 10 14 ,-;;3.;;..2 --:""""--,
~® ® ® ® ~
CITY
NO.
ROUTE SECT. BLANK NO. NO.
F 1 I I '? () ,;, / ~ ?'· '{ ~ I 0: 0 I
37
ADT
(1,000)
41 43 45 47
~
PEAl< t:
HR. i
% "'
Q:
0
URBAN
POP,
(1,000)
51 52 53 54 56 57 59 61 63 64
86 87 88 (s9) ~ APPR. %TURNS
'<:..;/ ,~ WIDTH
-c 2 1 ~WAY WAY -c _ Lt.
STR. ~.toC
Rt.
Q 0 a.o I 0 5.0 oc; a 0 17 L '? 2 0 f 13 I I 0.0 J,4 , ... • . ··-·
. •
• •
INSTRUCTIONS:
(82) Uae 10% if actual not known
... (83) Uae 50% or greater
(84) Use 5% if actual not known
(90) Code: (1) CBD (2) FBD
(93)(94) Uae10% if actual not known
(96) Uae 65% if actual not known
(97) Use 0.70 .if actual not known
198) Use 0.85 If actual not known
67 69 71
BASE z
~ RAV ::1 w
...: SPD. o: .!
.J MPH " 1-m ~
SECTION
LENGTH
MIJ_ES
o oo.42
Q: oo
<(l-ou
.JoC
II.
74 77
• •
.• e
13) OBD (4) RA (5) SA (99) Code: N =None, L = Left, R =Right, B =Both
Attach Vicinity Mop: (show route and location of propoud project.)
!-
1
~
2 -
3 -
4 -
5 -
67-70
73-76
77-80
,r
~-----·--·----
-.~·.~. ............. , ..
. ·,'
· ..... -~ :. -i.;_
:._;: :":>''./. <. -'·; .... ··.; 'f .........
. ~ .......
·' . "~-·· _, ... · .. ·.., -~-...
URBAt\1 ARTERIAL BOARD
ARTERIAL INVENTORY
RELATING TO SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM (SUPPLEMENTAL SECTION) ADOPTED BY: /
RESOLUTION N0.--=-'"7~6"-'=co::;.....,-""'"'"
ADOPTION DATE (:;,-; 7·-7~
IDENTIFICATION UBr-:-1-2 STRUCTURAL
YB I 3 !:/B I 60-61
1. Urban Reg ion 31. +Ride
.' 7 .C-5 62-63
2. County ' 32. +Pavement Condition
0 , I r-6-9
.
' 6<4-65
3. City Town '-" ") 33. +Drainage and Crou Section Adequacy
2 .... C] /1 I 10-13 Condition Ride Str. Cond. Dr. Cond. .C. Route Humber . j ' Good .Cl-50 31-40 8-10
0 0 I U-16 Fair 31-40 21-30 5-7
5. Section Humber Poor 21-30 11-20 2-.C
2 17 Very Poor 0-20 0-10 0-1
6. Urban Functional Clauification ~
ACCIDENTS (Record Dota on the basis of a
lololzl3l 18-21
2 YEAR EXPERIENCE)
7. Section Length (0.01 Mile) 0 I 6 69-71 r--------------------------35. Property Damage Only (Accidents X 1) __
8. Arterial Name /{J 4--fh AVe 5:E 0 7 8 72-74
36. Injury Accidents (Accidents X 6)
::~ 23C. -I-A PI 37. Fatal Accidents (Accidents X 25) !) 0 0 75-77
9. Begin Termini
.(0
., ... _,, ,, ~.1~
End Termini « ..-,. l-I l -·
I nl I I 22-23 TRAFFIC u c 1-2
10. Urban Area Humber '!~ Ia I I (o 0 () 18-23
39. Existing AADT
30-3<4
.C3. Capacity (Hourly)
.. 35-37
.C.C. V/C Ratio
EXISTING CONDITIONS 38-39
GEOMETRICS 45. Present Operating Speed
j_ 73 UB 0 "' 37-38 .C9. Transit Bus Route 0. No 1. Yes
17. Humber of Thru Lanes (Both Directions) .<-,., 0 39-.CO COST, THOUSANDS u D 1-2 18. Pavement Width /-
7 41-<42 UD 7 !<1 <47-50
19. R. Shoulder Width t) 65. Preliminary Engineering (UAB)
0 0 <43-44 2 :2. 53-56
19. L. Shoulder Width 66. Right of Way (UAB)
;;. ,1 <45-46 "? :J ? 67-70 .,.
20. Total Roadway Width ' 69. Construction (UAB) --/
25. Traffic Control 0 Hone, 1 Fixed, 2 Actuated, "'1 54 -:::' ~ "! 73-76
Devices 3 Pro11reu ive, 4 Stop Sign ,t._ •• _ 70. Total (UAB) -
27. Area Development 1 CBD, 2 Fringe, 3 Out, ? 56 ,, '? ,.-
77-80 4 Res, 5 Sub ~ 71. Total Proj. Cost (UAB +Loco I)
,. /
CAPACITY DATA FOR CONTROLLED INTERSECTION
1 3 4 6 10 14 32
~ ® @ ® em @§) .
1!1
ow w SECTION
0::11. 0:: co. CITY ROUTE SECT. BLANK LENGTH <>-a:i NO. NO. NO. NO. MI.LES Ul-0:: ::J
F 1 • I I 7 0 ~ I r, 7.. 7 1 I 0 ') I Q Q:J.2-3
37 41 43 45 .C7 51 52 53 54 56 57 59 61 63 6.C 67 69 71 74 77 !£
@.9 @ @ ~ @ 86 87 8 8@) ~ APPR. %TURNS ~ @ (2z) (2§) ~ WIDTH
~ 0:: @ @ @ @
!:: w ~ASE 1!1 w
PEAl< 0:: URBAN ~ . >-... z 0:: 0::
ADT :.O::::r:: ~ :..:: lrRAV ww QO :..::o::o z :..:: u
HR. ..I POP. <VII-< 2 1 <I-z z Q. u • o::"'3 z w~ <::JI-:..:: (1,000) "' ::J:.o:: 0:: <-LL ::1 WAY WAY < SPD. ou wou < w
% (1,000) Lt. Rt. 0::-0:: ..I ::J O::Q. w..lu 0 ..I 1!11-..I< A.::t:< ~ < STR. ,toC MPH < Ill 0 ~-~ t-u< Ill LL LL Q. ci ~ w
Q LL "' z -
_Q I 1.~ /,0 5S' q.; Q.O I 7!... 3 2 ot g I I_ DD 15 2_L; 4.0 0}0 a S'5 ~I 1 -
2 . * _._ --3 • • . -.. . . • • -
5 • . • -
IHSTR UCT IONS:
(82) Use 10% if actual not known (93)(9.C) Use10% if actual not known
-· (83) Use 50% or greater (96) Use 65% \f actual not known ··-
(8.C) Use 5% if actual not known (97) Use 0.70 if actual not known
(90) Code: (1) CBD (2) FBD 198) Use 0.85 if actual not known
13) OBD (4) RA (5) SA (99) Code: H =Hone, L =Left, R =Right, B =Both
Attach Vicinity Map: (show route and location of proposed project.)
. ··.
~~ ,'1. ·//~ : ' .. ., .. , . ........
~ • "· ••• • ,>
URBAl\J ARTERIAL BOARD
ARTERIAL INVENTORY
RELATING TO SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM (SUPPLEMENTAL SECTION) ADOPTED BY:
RESOLUTION N0.-+-7-=fo:....;:fo~~
ADOPTION DATE 0-17--7'1
IDENTIFICATION UBr--1-2 STRUCTURAL
~B I 3 !:!~ I 60-61
1. Urban Region 31. +Ride
I 7 4-5 62-63
2. County 32. + Panment Condition
0 ? I r 6-9
~
64-65
3. City Town ,> 33. +Drainage and Crou Section Adequacy ,/
10-13 Condition Ride Str. Cond. Dr. Cond. 4. Route Number Good 41-50 31-40 8-10
14-16 Fair 31-40 21-30 5-7
5. Section Number Poor 21-30 11-20 2-4
j_ 17 Very Poor 0-20 0-10 0-1
6. Urban Functional Clauification
ACCIDENTS (Record Data on the basis of a
I I 1 I I 18-21
2 YEAR EXPERIENCE)
7. Section Length (0.01 Mile)
35. Property Damage Only (Acci~ents X 1) --Em 69-71 ----------------------------
5. ;eo.;-;, s+. 72-74
8. Arterial Name 36. Injury Accidents (Ace idents X 6) w. VALLEY .f!W'! 37. Fatal Accidents (Accidents X 25)
75-77
9. Begin Termini
......._ VA[_~ t-::'/ !~'r!Y End Termini t::::.
I ol ' I 22-23 TRAFFIC u c 1-2
10. Urban Area Number !;!C l 18-23
39. Existing AADT
.• :. ·:· 30-34
43. Capacity (Hourly)
. j •. 35-37
44. V/C Ratio . :.
EXISTING CONDITIONS :;··\ .: .. 38-39
GEOMETRICS 45. Present Operating Speed
UB 49. Transit Bus Route
73
0 2 37-38 0. No 1. Yea -17. Number of Thru Lanes (Both Directions)
18. Panment Width
I) () 39-40 COST, THOUSANDS u D 1-2 ,..
(l ... 41-42 ~~ 9 0 47-50
19. R. Shoulder Width I 65. Preliminary Engineering (UAB)
19. L. Shoulder Width I) Q 43-44 / R 9 53-56
... 1
66. Right of Way (UAB)
3 45-46 ) -~ -. I 67-70
20. Total Roadway Width 69. Construction (UAB) I ,,
25. Traffic Control 0 None, 1 Fixed, 2 Actuated, 0 54 ~ I ,... ·-73-76
bevices 3 Pr~reuive, 4 Stop Sign 70. Total (UAB)
27. Area Development 1 CBD, 2 Fringe, 3 Out, 3 56 .., ·1 1)"" .. -77-80 4 Rea, 5 Sub
• ...__ 71. Total Proj. Cost (UAB +Local)
CAPACITY DATA FOR CONTROLLED INTERSECTION , 3 4 6 10 14 32
~ ® @ @ -@ @
C)
QW w SECTION 0:: co. CITY ROUTE SECT. 0::11.. BLANK LENGTH <>-u:i NO. NO. NO. NO. Ul-0:: MI.LES
:I
F 1 .. .
37 41 43 45 47 51 52 53 54 56 57 59 61 63 64 67 69 71 74 77 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ® 86 87 8 8@) r!2 APPR. %TURNS ~ \§) ~ (2§) ~ WIDTH
~ ~ @ @ @) l9 PEA~ !::: ~ w BAS~~ w
URBAN ~ .>-1-z 0:: 0:: C) ~ u ADT ...1 ~:z: <"'1-~ < 2 1 ~ RA ww QO ~0::0 z z z
(1,000) HR. II.. u . POP. o::"':::i ~WAY z w~ <I-<:II-~ < w
% "' :I~ (1,000) o::<-u.. WAY Lt. Rt. < SPD. 0::-ou wou 0:: ...1 :::1 0::11.. w-'u 0 < STR. C.toC ...1 MPH Cll-..J< 11-:J:< < Ill a ~ ~--~ t-U< 0 Ill ~ u.. u.. II.. w
Q u.. "' z ~
l/.() ..1 ~J 1" r: R -;r_. ( ·; 1 (.) -~! s 2 .. . 1
1-
2
-• .. --r-
-· 3 .. .. .. .. 1-
' 4 ' .. .. .. r-
'• 5 • .. . .. '--
INSTRUCT IONS:
(82) Use 10% if actual not known (93)(94) UselO% if actual not known ... (83) Use 50% ar greater (96) Use 65% !factual not known
(84) Use 5% if actual not known (97) Use 0.70 if actual not known
(90) Code: (1) CBD (2) FBD 198) Use 0.85 if actual not known
13) OBD (4) RA (5) SA (99) Code: N =None, L =Left, R =Right, B =Both
Attach Vicinity Map: (show route and location of proposed project.)
-· , .. :.::~· ~~-~·::~;_,<~~;".:..... ': ./
--~:-~;-: / -.. ,
. ,•,". · ..
,,.,.,. ,.,
')_' c·~~ >·,;.~.'_
'') ...
URBAl\J ARTERIAL BOARD
ARTERIAL INVENTORY
RELATING TO SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM (SUPPLEMENTAL SECTION) ADOPTED BY: -,;,. t.
-RESOLUTION NO. , ~ ~
ADOPTION DATE ~-/7-7'f
IDENTIFICATION UB.--1-2 STRUCTURAL
UB I 3 y~
J;lfl 1. Urban Region 31. +Ride
I 7 4-5
2. County I 32. +Pavement Condition
(} (, j s 6-9
3. City Town 33. +Drainage and Crou Section Adequacy
I 8 0 ' 10-13 Condition Ride Str. Cand. Dr. Cand. 4. Route Humber I
Good 41-50 31-40 8-10
0 0 .., 14-16 Fair 31-40 21-30 5-7
5. Section Humber ~--Poor 21-30 11-20 2-4
._L 17 Very Poor 0-20 0-10 0-1
6. Urban Functional Clauificatlon
ACCIDENTS (Record Data an the basis of a
I ,,lal.;;lo I 18-21
2 YEAR EXPERIENCE)
7. Section Length (0.01 Mile) 0 ~ G -----------------------------35. Property Damage Only (Accidents X 1) __ ""
CENTRAL AVENUE 0 -1 8 8. Arterial Name 36. Injury Accidents (Accidents X 6) I
9. Begin Termini .JA/'AE$" )T. 37. Fatal Accidents (Accidents X 25) 0 0 0
End Termini ___ :,._·/_! L_L_I_f:_.<;",_F_-__ _
TRAFFIC U C
0 I 22-23 l)C l -(J/C.,£.00 t-"----------------------....4 39. Existing AADT -----...._-+-..._+-'"''-"""'""'-1---+----t
10. Urban Area Humber
43. Capacity (Hourly)------'--......i--f--+-+--1 ..
44. V /C Ratio------------.__.,_-+._..J ;,
________ .... L_'--+---t EXISTING CONDITIONS 45. Present Operating Speed GEOMETRICS
60-61
62-63
U-65
69-71
72-74
75-77
1-2
18-23
30-34
35-37
38-39
UB f) 4 37-38 49. Transit Bus Route 0. No 1. Yes r 73 ------------~ 17. Humber of Thru Lanes (Both Directions) __
18. Pa¥ement Width 1 0 39-40 COST, THOUSANDS
19. R. Shoulder Width 0 0 41-42 ug
65. Preliminary Engineering (UAB)
19. L. Shoulder Width f) 0 43-44
66. Right of Way (UAB)
20. Total Roadway Width
t;' () 45-46 .. 69. Construction (UAB) I
25. Traffic Control 0 Hone, 1 F heed, 2 Actuated,
3 Pr~reuive, 4 Stop Sign 3 54 f
Devices 70. Total (UAB)
27. Area Development 1 CBD, 2 Fringe, 3 Out, '2-56 4 Res, 5 Sub 71. Total Proj. Cost (UAB +Local)
•
L.....--
CAPACITY DATA FOR CONTROLLED INTERSECTION
1 3 4 6 10 14 ,.:3::2~ ....... --
~@ ® @ @ @
C)
w OW
It: D. It: co. CITY ROUTE SECT. BLANK <C>-IIi NO. NO. Ul-It: ::l
F 1 I .!1 I) t1 It; i
:
37 41 43 45 47
~
PEAl< !::: 0:: URBAN ADT .J :O.::J:
( 1,000) HR. D. u • POP.
% "' ::l:o.: (1,000) It: D.
It: ~--~
0
NO. NO.
g <~ I 002.. I
51525354 5657 59 61 6364
86 87 88 @ ~ APPR. % TURNS ~ r-~w~I~D~T~H~~~~~
!: .>-
<C"'I-o:"'::i o:<t-w.Ju
t-U<C
IL.
It: w
1-
%
IL.
0
ci
%
([9 l~ -® l9
<( 2 1 ~WAY WAY -c _ Lt.
STR. t:.toC
Rt.
q lt; .. t:; !05S Ot; Q.Ql7L. I 2 0./ 2..2.0 00 44
0 15.S r o s:; o~ a.. a 1 7 L I o.l;!. zo 0 0 1..2.
0./ $.) /0 55 o5 o.o,-~-; L I D I 2.1..'2.. 0012
• .
e .
INSTRUCT IONS:
(82) Use Hl% if actual not known
· ·• (83) Use 50% or greater
(84) Use 5% if actual not known
(90) Code: (1) CBD (2) FBD
(93)(94) Use10% if actual not known
(96) Use 65% if actua I not known
(97) Use 0.70 lf actual not known
198) Use 0.85 if actual not known
SECTION
LENGTH
Mil-ES
DOCJ .. t:;e>
67 69 71 74
~ ® ® @
BA~~ % It: It:
:0.: RA ww 00 :O.:r:t:O
% <CI-<C::ll-<( SPD. W::E ou It:-wou .J MPH Cll-.J<( D. :I:<(
II) tf?. IL. IL.
~/) ~0 ()7() o.B.z;
'jfJ '7. c. 0.7 0 0 8)
30 S(. ·:J.7 9 J.8 ~:;
£ .
A
13) OBD (4) RA (5) SA (99) Code: H =Hone, L =Left, R =Right, B =Both
Attach Vicinity Map: (show route and location of proposed project,)
77
~
C)
%
:0.:
It:
<(
D.
fl./ .
N
"'
I
u D 1-2
I I' 47-50 ..t'
{) 53-56
(., D 61-70
7 I' 73-76 ' ;1
IJ .. 77-80 .,
~
w
:0.: u
% % <( w .J ::l
II) a w
"' ...._
1 r-
2
r-
3 -
4 -
5 -
r -----
-
.. ~:.,·• .....
,:._· ...• ·, ..
. :' :: .:;-:~: .. :::';I';,;:·,; j~:.;\~1~~-::: .. '
URBA-I'J ARTERIAL BOARD
ARTERIAL INVENTORY
RELATING TO SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM (SUPPLEMENTAL SECTION) ADOPTED BY: ?f. ,
RESOLUTION NO. -'-':-?
UB
1-
UB
ADOPTION DATE ~-;'7~7'/
IDENTIFICATION UB_ 1-2 STRUCTURAL
I 3 !:!B '3 0 60-61
1. Urban Region 31.+Ride
I 7 4-5 I ~ 62-63
2. County 32. +Pavement Condition
0 ~ I 5 6-9 0 1-j-64-65
3. City Town 33. + Drainage and Crou Section Adequacy
J 0 7 3 10-13 Condition Ride Str. Cond. Or. Cond. 4. Route Humber Good 41-50 31-40 8-10
0 0 I 14-16 Fair 31-40 21-30 5-7
5. Section Humber Poor 21-30 11-20 2-4
. 6. Urban Functional Clauiflcatlon j_ 17 Very Poor 0-20 0-10 0-1
ACCIDENTS (Record Data on the baals of a
lolo]8l71 18-21
2 YEAR EXPERIENCE)
7. Section Length (0.01 Mile) 0 c; c. 69-71 --------------------------35. Property Damage Only (Accidents X 1) __ . ,
/(t::)IT KANGLt:Y R]J ?... 'I 8 72-74
8. Arterial Name 36. Injury Accidents (Accidents X 6) '-
I o 4 .Jh _A II.~ 0 7 r. 75-77
9. Begin Termini 37. Fatal Accidents (Accidents X 25) I
II C, +h AvE End Termini
I 0 1 I I 22-23
TRAFFIC u c 1-2
10. Urban Area Humber I;!C 1? I 5 3 0 () 18-23
39. Exiating AADT
30-34
43. Capacity (Hourly)
'. " 35-37
44. V/C Ratio
.
l·i -. .··
38-39 EXISTING CONDITIONS
GEOMETRICS 45. Present Operating Speed
0 2 37-38 49. Transit Bus Route 0. No 1. Yea
17. Humber af Thru Lanes (Both Directional--
18. Pa•ement Width '2. a 39-40 COST, THOUSANDS
19. R. Shoulder Width 0 5 41-42 ~~
65. Preliminary Engineering (UAB) I
19. L. Shoulder Width 0 0 43-44
66. Right of Way (UAB)
~ 0 45-46 !
20. Total Roadway Width 69. Conatruction (UAB)
25. Traffic Control 0 Hone, 1 Fixed, 2 Actua,.d, 3 54 I .J Devices 3 Pr!!lireuive, 4 Stop Sign 70. Total (UAB)
1 CBO, 2 Fringe, 3 Out, -27. Area Development 3 56 I I
4 Res, 5 Sub -71. Total Proj. Cast (UAB +Local)
CAPACITY DATA FOR CONTROLLED INTERSECTION
1 3 4 6 10 14 32
~ Cl9 ~ ® (Jj) ®
~
ow w SECTION
D::O. D:: co. CITY ROUTE SECT. BLANK LENGTH <>-ai NO. NO. NO. NO. MIJ.,ES Ul-D:: ::l
F 1 .. •
37 41 43 45 47 51 52 53 54 56 57 59 61 63 64 67 69 71 74 77
@)) ~ @) ~ @» 86 87 8 a@ ~ APPR. %TURNS cw ® ~ ~ ~ WIDTH
II'! IIi ® @ @) @
PEA~ !: ci w ~ASE ~ URBAN z >-.... z D:: D::
ADT ..I ~:z:: -..... !; ~ RAV ww oo ~D::O :; < 2 1 HR. 0.. u • POP. <~-~WAY z W::E <I-<::ll-~ (1,000) "' ::l~ D:: <I( ..I 1&. WAY <I( SPD. ou wou % (1,000) D:: ..I u Lt. Rt. D::-D:: D::o. 0 -c STR. ..I ~~-..I< 0-:Z::<C < D:: I-ll'! wu< ~.toC Ill MPH 1&. 1&. 0.. .... 1&. ci II'! a z
No • .1 ~Jr 1.::. p (':t;:o C..! I 0 N s 2 A c 'F£ C1 e!J --''-. -~ --' . •
.. _. jl_
---.. .. ..
-• • .. •
·-• . • •
INSTRUCTIONS:
(82) Use 10% if actual not known (93)(94) UselO% if actual nat known .. (83) Use 50% or greater (96) Use 65% !f actual not known
(84) Use 5% if actual not known (97) Use 0.70 if actual not known
(90) Code: (1) CBD (2) FBD 198) Use 0.85 if actual not known
13) OBD (4) RA (5) SA (99) Code: H =Hone, L =Left, R =Right, B =Both
Attach Vicinity Map: (show route and location of proposed project.)
.. ~-' .
~ z
<I( ..I
Ill
I 73 ..__
u 0 1-2
q 'i 47-50
I
::;
I :? 53-56
."~ I 67-70 , >A
-":? ;~ 73-76 '.
,.-:::'! 77-80 -
~
w u z w ::l
0 w
"' t-
1
t-
2
t-
3 ......
4
r-
5 ......_
····.~-.-~>~··
'':·'_·'·::,···