HomeMy WebLinkAbout920~ . .
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, regarding the adoption
of Surface Water Management policies for a portion
of the City of Kent.
WHEREAS, Surface Water Management policies have been pro-
posed in the attached Appendix "A", and are commonly referred
to as Surface Water Management policies for a portion of Kent, and
WHEREAS, public hearings were held before the Planning
Commission of the City of Kent, after notice of said hearings
were duly published, and
WHEREAS, after the final hearing of the Planning Commission
on October 28, 1980, the proposed Surface Water Management policies
were forwarded to the City Council with the recommendation that
they be adopted, and
WHEREAS, the City Council held hearings on the Surface Water
Management policies on December 11 and 22, 1980; January 26, 1981,
and February 17, 1981, and following said hearings either approved,
disapproved or modified the recommendations of the Planning
Commission, NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DO
HEREBY RESOLVE:
Section 1: That the Surface Water Management policies
attached hereto as Appendix "A" and commonly referred to as the
Surface Water Management policies for a portion of the City of
Kent, be and hereby are incorporated herein by reference as if
fully set forth herein, and the same hereby is adopted.
Section 2: That the Surface Water Management policies be
filed with the City Clerk and in the office of the Public Works
Department and be made available for public inspection upon request.
'h r ,., • ._.
PASSED at a regular meeting of the Kent City Council
this 2nd day of March, 1981.
ISABEL HOGAN, MAYOR
ATTEST:
OVED AS TO :FORM:
DONALD E MIRK, CITY ATTORNEY
I hereby certified that this is a true copy of
Resolution No. 9d-D , passed by the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, the 2nd day of March, 1981.
~-...:.__---~...,..· ~--:-f-----(SEAL)
MARIE JE~~ CLERK
Appendix A
Surface Water Management
1. Kent should continue to support the scs Valley Drainage projects.
2. Develop~ent of any drainage system should be consistent and
compatible with the proposed SCS Valley Drainage project.
3. Prohibit development north and east of the Green River within
the ,FIA designated pending areas unless equivalent storm water
storage or the LID is formed and passed or until the SCS Valley
Drainage project is constructed.
4. Adopt the concept of the north/south drainage channel and that
development thereof should proceed as soon as possible north
and east of the Green River.
5. All developments within the areas shall preserve the viability
of constructing the north/south drainage channel north and
east of the Green River.
6. Kent should proceed with the development of a city-wide storm
water drainage utility.
7. Recommend support for the LID plan proposed by the Public Works
Department as the drainage solution for the study areas north and
east of the Green River.
-i-
I
/
I
~.
\.
\ .,
I.
I•
. I
" ,.
'/ ,.
" 'I
II /I I .,
ij
il
.'I
LEGEND 111111111 Proposed SCS P-channel
-Existing trunk channel
---Proposed trunk channel
• • • • • • Proposed lateral
~ ~ storage area
--,.. Study area boundary
-ii-