HomeMy WebLinkAbout1378RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City
Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, relating to the Growth
Management Act funds disbursed by
the State Department of Community
Development to King county as pass
through funds to the City of Kent.
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act (hereinafter the
"Act") requires, among other things, that all jurisdictions in
King County prepare comprehensive plans in accordance with the
Act's provisions and that the jurisdictions' plans be consistent;
and
WHEREAS, funds were appropriated by the Legislature to
assist local governments in the implementation of the Act; and
WHEREAS, in the allocation of these funds, the
Washington State Department of Community Development ("DCD") has
in turn, allocated $2,557,411.00 in 1994 to assist in
implementing the Growth Management Act~ and
WHEREAS, DCD has required, as a condition to receiving
grant funds, the development of a "Joint Regional Strategy" work
program and grant fund allocation formula that must be approved
by sixty percent of all County jurisdictions, which jurisdictions
must comprise seventy-five percent of the County's population;
and
WHEREAS, in order to receive prior grant funds made
available through DCD under the Act, the City is required to
approve all necessary elements under the Act and approve and
execute an Interlocal Agreement with King County for the
distribution of those funds; and
WHEREAS, in order to receive the $59,754.00 allocated
to the City of Kent for 1994, the City must approve another
Interlocal Agreement with King County regarding the distribution
of the funds and accept the grant distribution formula and Joint
Regional Strategy as recommended by the King County Liaison Group
(an interjurisdictional group of planning, public works and
finance officials); NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City agrees that, in order to be
eligible for 1994 Act funds, it shall perform the following
tasks:
A. Authorize the Mayor to sign the Interlocal
Agreement with King County regarding the distribution of 1994 Act
grant funds, in substantially the same form as "A Service
Agreement for the Distribution and Administration of Certain
Washington Department of Community Development Grant Funds Under
the State of Washington Growth Management Act of 1990 11
(hereinafter the "Agreement"), attached hereto as Exhibit A and
incorporated herein by this reference; and
B. Perform the tasks specifically described in
the Agreement for the continued fund disbursements and in order
to comply with all applicable laws; and
c. Participate and provide information and data
as requested to accomplish the 1992 Joint Regional Strategy
Countywide Planning Policies Work Program (Attachment 1 to the
Agreement) ; and
2
D. Accept the grant allocation formula which
reserves $490,000.000 for region-wide efforts (Attachment 2 to
the Agreement) ; and
E. Designate the King County Liaison Group to
coordinate the interjurisdictional work in the Joint Regional
Strategy (Attachment 3 to the Agreement);
F. Designate King County as the fiscal agent to:
submit the application to DCD for 1994 Growth Management Act
grant funds on behalf of participating jurisdictions; receive DCD
grant funds to municipal jurisdictions according to the approved
allocation formula; and otherwise carry out its responsibilities
as further described in the Agreement.
Passed at a regular meeting of the city Council of the
City of Kent, Washington this 7 day of ~ , 199}.
Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, this
day of . ~ 199}.
ATTEST:
3
of
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy
Resolution No. /~7! , passed by the City Council of the
the 1 day of Ale/C£--rvVt..e/\.--, Cit¥ of Kent, Washington,
199Jf.
94GMA.RES
120293.KRB
4
u--&/L/ (SEAL)
CITY CLERK
1
A SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR THE DISTRIBUTION AND ADMINISTRATION OF CERTAIN
WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GRANT FUNDS UNDER THE STATE OF
WASHINGTON GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1990
THIS AGREEMENT, signed this ___ day of---------
199 ____ by and between King County and the City/Town of ___ _
("the Municipal Jurisdiction").
WHEREAS, the Washington State Legislature passed the Growth Management
Act of 1990 and 1991 (Chapter 17), hereinafter referred to as "the Act," which
requires all jurisdictions in the County of King to prepare comprehensive
plans consistent with new guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the Act requires that jurisdictions prepare these plans in
cooperation with neighboring units of general government; and
WHEREAS, the State of Washington through the adoption and administration
of the Act will make funds available to local jurisdictions through the State
of Washington Department of Community Development, hereinafter referred to as
DCD, for expenditure during the 1993-1995 funding years; and
WHEREAS, the Act directs DCD to establish funding levels for planning
and technical assistance grants for counties and cities that plan under this
Act and DCD has allocated $2,557,411 to King County jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, King County and the municipal jurisdictions within King County
have been designated together as a county region by DCD for the purpose of
receiving DCD funds; and
WHEREAS, DCD requires King County and the municipal jurisdictions within
King County to develop a regional work program, hereinafter referred to as a
"Joint Regional Strategy," for the 1993-1995 calendar years and beyond for
implementation of the Act and for the purpose of receiving DCD funds and to
designate an institutional framework to coordinate the accomplishment of the
Joint Regional Strategy; and
WHEREAS, DCD requires King County and the municipal jurisdictions within
King County to develop an allocation formula for receipt of the DCD grant
funds within the county region and designate a fiscal agent to receive and
distribute DCD funds according to the approved allocation formula; and
WHEREAS, DCD requires that the Joint Regional Strategy and allocation
formula be approved by 60% of legislative authorities of the county and
municipal jurisdictions within King County representing 75% of the total
population of King County; and
WHEREAS, only King County and municipal jurisdictions which have adopted
the Joint Regional Strategy and have agreed to the allocation formula by
resolution, motion, or ordinance will be eligible to receive DCD grant funds;
and
WHEREAS, in 1991, 1992 and 1993 King County and municipal jurisdictions
entered into interlocal agreements for the distribution of DCD Growth
Management Act grant funds which included approving Joint Regional Strategies
and grant allocation formulas; and
WHEREAS, the King County Liaison Group, which consists of Planning
Directors, Public Works Directors and Finance Directors representing King
County, the City of Seattle, and other municipal jurisdictions within King
County, recommends the Countywide Planning Policies Work Program as the Joint
Regional Strategy and the grant allocation formula contained herein; and
WHEREAS, King County has entered into an Intergovernmental Agreement
with DCD to serve as fiscal agent for the distribution of grant funds among
King County and the municipal jurisdictions within King County; and
WHEREAS, the King County Council through the adoption of proposed
Ordinance #93776, Section 89, will appropriate DCD funds for distribution to
EXHIBIT A
2
King County and the municipal jurisdictions within King County for the 1993-
1995 funding period; and
WHEREAS, King County and the Municipal Jurisdiction enter into this
Agreement pursuant to and in accordance with the State Interlocal Cooperation
Act, RCW Chapter 39.34, for the purpose of distributing and administrating DCD
funds and for the execution of activities in accordance with and under author-
ity of the Act;
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE FOREGOING CIRCUMSTANCES AND IN
CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL PROMISES HEREIN, IT IS AGREED THAT:
I. GENERAL AGREEMENT
King County and the Municipal Jurisdiction agree to comply with the
provisions of the "Joint Regional Strategy," which is attached hereto as
Attachment 1 and is incorporated herein as is fully set forth, by under-
taking growth management activities, including coordination of planning
efforts to achieve consistency, the development of a public participa-
tion process, and undertaking other coordinated planning activities as
specified in the Growth Management Act of 1990 and 1991.
II. ENTITLEMENT
The parties agree that the allocation of funds appropriated by the State
of Washington Department of Community Development ("DCD") among King
County and the municipal jurisdictions within King County shall be
governed by the following provisions as outlined in the Grant Allocation
Formula, which is attached hereto as Attachment 2 and is incorporated
herein as is fully set forth:
A. By entering this Agreement the Municipal Jurisdiction is eligible
to receive a direct share, hereinafter referred to as a pass-
through, of DCD funds as calculated in the Grant Allocation
Formula, which is based on the following principles:
1. Of the total DCD grant to King County, $490,000 shall be
reserved for Countywide efforts.
2. The pass-through shall include a minimum amount of $14,580.
3. The remainder of the funds shall be allocated on a per
capita basis based on a proportional distribution of total
population with King County as determined in the June 1993
estimate by the State of Washington Office of Financial
Management.
4. If the Municipal Jurisdiction is partially within King
County and partially within an adjacent county, it shall
have its base amount adjusted based on the proportion of its
population which is located in King County.
B. -King County shall distribute any unallocated funds in the same
manner as described in paragraph II(A)(2) above or in another
manner approved by King County and a minimum of nineteen (19)
municipal jurisdictions within King County. Together the popula-
tion of unincorporated King County and the approving municipal
jurisdictions must represent 75% of the total population of King
County.
C. This Agreement is contingent upon the adoption of a resolution,
motion, or ordinance by the Municipal Jurisdiction approving the
Joint Regional Strategy and Grant Allocation Formula for DCD grant
funds and of a municipal work program which outlines the Municipal
Jurisdiction's implementation of the Act or the Joint Regional
Strategy.
3
III. REIMBURSEMENT PROVISIONS
The parties agree that King County is the designated fiscal agent for
the distribution of DCD funds under the terms of this Agreement. Within
ten {10) business days after receiving each quarterly warrant from DCD,
King County shall issue a warrant to the Municipal Jurisdiction for an
amount equal to one quarter {to the nearest dollar) of the total amount
the Municipal Jurisdiction is entitled to receive according to the Grant
Allocation Formula.
IV. USE OF FUNDS: GENERAL PROVISIONS
A. Funds provided. to the Municipal Jurisdiction under this Agreement
shall be used solely for activities undertaken to fulfill the
requirements of the Act and to implement the Joint Regional
Strategy.
B. The Municipal Jurisdiction agrees to conduct the appropriate
citizen participation activities as required by the Act, RCW
Chapter 36.70. Such activities shall include the broad dissemina-
tion of proposals and alternatives, opportunity for written
comments, public meeting after effective notice, provisions for
open discussion, communication programs, information services, and
consideration of and response to public comments.
V. ROLE OF THE KING COUNTY LIAISON GROUP
The parties agree that the King County Liaison Group {Attachment 3},
which consists of the planning directors, public works directors, and
finance directors or their designees from King County, the City of
Seattle, and other municipal jurisdictions within King County, shall
serve as a joint forum for the review and recommendation of policy
matters and state requirements to the legislative authorities of King
County and the municipal jurisdictions within King County. The parties
hereby agree that the King County Liaison Group shall prepare for DCD an
annual regional progress report which describes accomplishments of the
Joint Regional Strategy.
VI. RESPONSIBILITIES AND POWERS OF THE MUNICIPAL JURISDICTION
The Municipal Jurisdiction shall have the following responsibilities and
powers:
A. The Municipal Jurisdiction shall propose to its legislative
authority a local work program which includes an examination of
its role in recognizing and addressing regional or county-wide
needs through a coordinated funding approach with King County and
other municipal jurisdictions.
B. The Municipal Jurisdiction shall prepare an annual progress report
in accordance with the primary objectives and requirements of the
Act, RCW Chapter 36.70. The Municipal Jurisdiction's annual
progress report shall be sent to the Office of the Manager, King
County Planning and Community Development Division, 707 Smith
Tower Building, -506 Second Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104.
C. The Municipal Jurisdiction shall exercise its discretion in deter-
mining the use of its pass-through funds in a manner consistent
with the Act and the Joint Regional Strategy including the Munici-
pal Jurisdiction's local policies.
D. The Municipal Jurisdiction agrees to propose to its legislative
authority activities and budgets for inclusion in the implementa-
tion of the Joint Regional Strategy.
E. The Municipal Jurisdiction shall send representatives to partici-
pate actively in technical forums for the purpose of accomplishing
the Joint Regional Strategy.
4
F. The Municipal Jurisdiction shall prepare and submit to King County
for transmittal to DCD a short written description of high
priority growth management work program projects upon which the
Municipal Jurisdiction intends to begin work during the period
between July 1, 1993 and July 1, 1994. This description shall
include reference to work program projects which implement the
Joint Regional Strategy.
G. The Municipal Jurisdiction undertaking activities and/or projects
with DCD funds distributed under this Agreement retains full civil
and criminal liability as though these funds were locally gener-
ated.
H. The Municipal Jurisdiction shall fully comply with the State
Environmental Policy Act.
I. The Municipal Jurisdiction shall maintain accounts and records,
including personnel, property, financial, and programmatic
records, and other such records as deemed necessary, to ensure
proper accounting for all project funds and compliance with this
Agreement. All such records shall sufficiently and properly
reflect all direct and indirect costs of any nature expended and
services provided in the performance of this Agreement. These
records shall be maintained until June 30, 1996, unless a longer
retention period is required by law.
J. The Municipal Jurisdiction acknowledges that following
disbursement of the first and second calendar quarters'
allocation, the State Department of Community Development or King
County shall, upon written notification by DCD, withhold funds
from a city or town for failure to complete the procedural
requirements of the Growth Management Act or upon determination of
non-compliance by a Growth Planning Hearings Board; jurisdictions
missing deadlines during the agreement period will be limited to
one further calendar quarter's allocation prior to withholding.
K. The Municipal Jurisdiction agrees to mail a sufficient number of
copies of completed documents to State agencies. DCD shall
provide a mailing list for this purpose.
VII. RESPONSIBILITIES AND POWERS OF KING COUNTY
King County, by and through its employees, agents, and representatives,
agrees to:
A. Obtain and present to the King County Liaison Group all applicable
State and DCD policy guidelines, special conditions, and format
requirements related to the implementation of the Joint Regional
Strategy and related to the administration of the grant funds
distributed pursuant to the Act, RCW Chapter 36.70.
B. Prepare and present to DCD the annual progress report regarding
the implementation of the Joint Regional Strategy as required by
DCD pursuant to the Act, RCW Chapter 36.70.
C. Identify supptemental sources of funding to increase the ability
of King County and the municipal jurisdictions within King County
to carry out effective growth management activities.
D. Prepare reports, organize meetings and technical forums/work
groups as needed for the King County Liaison Group to assist in
the implementation of the Joint Regional Strategy.
VIII. GENERAL TERMS
A. This Agreement for the 1993-1995 fund distribution shall be
effective July 1, 1993 through December 31, 1994. The parties
acknowledge that some jurisdictions will still be working on
comprehensive plans beyond 1994 and that commitment to complete
these plans does not terminate with this agreement. The parties
agree to use their best efforts to work with DCD to secure
additional funding beyond the 1993-1995 funding period and to
execute subsequent agreements.
5
B. The King County Council through the adoption of proposed Ordinance
#93776, Section 89, will appropriate DCD funds for distribution to
King County and the municipal jurisdictions within King County for
the 1993-1995 funding period.
C. It is recognized that amendments to this Agreement may become
necessary, and such amendment shall take place only when the
parties have executed a written addendum to this Agreement.
IX. EVALUATION AND MONITORING
A. The records and documents with respect to all matters covered by
this Agreement shall be subject to inspection, review, or audit by
King County so authorized or as requested by DCD during the
performance of this Agreement and until June 30, 1996, unless a
longer retention period is required by law.
B. The Municipal Jurisdiction agrees to cooperate with any monitoring
or evaluation activities conducted by King County that pertain to
the subject of this Agreement. The Municipal Jurisdiction agrees
to allow King County, DCD, the State Auditor, and/or any of their
employees, agents, or representatives to have full access to and
the right to examine during normal business hours and as often as
King County may deem necessary, all of the Municipal Jurisdic-
tion's records with respect to all matters covered by this Agree-
ment. King County and/or any of its employees, agents, or repre-
sentatives shall be permitted to audit, examine, and make excerpts
or transcripts from such records and to make audits of all
invoices, materials, payrolls, and record of matters covered by
this Agreement. King County will give advance notice to the
Municipal Jurisdiction in the case of fiscal audits to be
conducted.
C. The results and records of said evaluation shall be maintained and
disclosed in accordance with RCW Chapter 42.17.
X. HOLD HARMLESS
A. King County assumes no responsibility for the payment of any
compensation, wages, benefits, or taxes to or on behalf of the
Municipal Jurisdiction, its employees, or others by reason of this
Agreement. The Municipal Jurisdiction shall protect, indemnify
and save harmless King County, its officers, agents, and employees
from and against any and all claims, costs, and losses whatsoever
occurring or resulting from (1) the Municipal Jurisdiction's
failure to pay any such compensation, wages, benefits, or taxes;
and (2) the supplying to the Municipal Jurisdiction of work,
services, materials, or supplies by municipal employees or others
in connection with or in support of the performance of this Agree-
ment.
B. The Municipal -Jurisdiction-further agrees that it is financially
responsible for and shall repay King County all indicated amounts
following an audit exception which occurs due to the negligence,
intentional acts or failure for any reason to comply with the
terms of this Agreement by the Municipal Jurisdiction, its offi-
cers, employees, agents, or representatives. This duty to repay
King County shall not be diminished or extinguished by the prior
termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section VIII or Section
IX.
C. The Municipal Jurisdiction shall protect, defend, indemnify, and
save harmless King County and the State of Washington, their offi-
cers, employees, and agents from any and all costs, claims, judg-
ments, or awards of damages, arising out of or in any way
resulting from the negligent acts or omissions of the Municipal
Jurisdiction, its officers, employees, or agents. The Municipal
Jurisdiction agrees that its obligations under this subparagraph
6
extend to any claim, demand, or cause of action brought by or on
behalf of any employee of the Municipal Jurisdiction against King
County, its officers, agents, or employees, and includes any judg-
ment, award, and cost arising therefrom, including attorney fees.
King County shall protect, defend, indemnify, and save harmless
the Municipal Jurisdiction, its officers, employees, and agents
from any and all costs, claims, judgments, or awards of damages,
arising out of or in any way resulting from the negligent acts or
omissions of King County, its officers, employees, or agents.
King County agrees that its obligations under this subparagraph
extend to any claim, demand, or cause of action brought by or on
behalf of any employee of King County against the Municipal Juris-
diction, its officers, agents, or employees, and includes any
judgment, award, and cost arising therefrom, including attorney
fees.
Claims shall include, but not be limited to, assertions that the
use or transfer of any software, book, document, report, film,
tape, or sound reproduction or material of any kind, delivered
hereunder, constitutes an infringement or any copyright, patent,
trademark, trade name, or otherwise results in unfair trade
practice.
D. The Municipal Jurisdiction shall provide King County with evidence
of general liability insurance with limits of no less than $1
million per occurrence to provide coverage for claims for injuries
to persons or damages to property which may arise from, or in
connection with the performance of work hereunder by the Municipal
Jurisdiction, its agents, representatives, employees, or subcon-
tractors. If the Municipal Jurisdiction is self-insured for this
requirement, a certification of self-insurance shall constitute
compliance with this section.
XI. TERMINATION
A. This Agreement may be terminated without cause by King County, in
whole or in part, prior to the date specified in Section VIII,
upon thirty (30} days advance written notice of the termination to
the Municipal Jurisdiction.
B. If at any time during the term of this Agreement, either (1) the
State of Washington terminates King County's DCD grant status, or
otherwise acts to terminate, reduce, modify, or withhold its grant
funding to King County, or (2) any necessary appropriations of
funds for the Municipal Jurisdiction are not made to King County
by the State of Washington, or are revoked or withheld, or (3) the
King County Council does not appropriate DCD funds for distribu-
tion to the Municipal Jurisdiction, then King County may terminate
this Agreement upon giving twenty (20) days' written notice to the
Municipal Jurisdiction. The parties acknowledge that, except as
otherwise specifically provided for herein, King County shall in
no event be responsible for the payment of any funds to the Munic-
ipal Jurisdiction. King County, as the official fiscal agent,
·shall have the authority and responsibility to ensure that upon
termination of this Agreement, any remaining DCD funds are made
available in the manner described in paragraph II(C} above and in
accordance with state regulations, or returned to DCD.
C. Nothing herein shall limit, waive, or extinguish any right or
remedy provided by this Agreement or law that either party may
have in the event that the obligations, terms, and conditions set
forth in this Agreement are breached by the other party.
XII. REDUCTION OF FUNDS
In the event that there is a reduction of funds by the State of
Washington or DCD, and if such funds are the basis for this Agreement,
then King County may unilaterally terminate all or part of this
Agreement, or King County and the Municipal Jurisdiction may reduce
their respective scopes of work or budgets under this Agreement.
XIII. SEVERABILITY
7
In the event any term or condition of this Agreement or application
thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity
shall not affect other terms, conditions, or applications of this
Agreement which can be given effect without the invalid term, condition
or application. To this end the terms and conditions of this Agreement
are declared severable.
XIV. RECAPTURE PROVISION
A. In the event that DCD elects to recapture funds from either King
County or the Municipal Jurisdiction for failure to expend grant
funds in accordance with state law and/or the provisions of this
Agreement, King County reserves the right to recapture such funds
on behalf of DCD in an amount equivalent to the extent of noncom-
pliance.
B. Such right of recapture shall exist for a period not to exceed
three (3) years following termination of this Agreement. Repay-
ment by the Municipal Jurisdiction of such funds under this recap-
ture provision shall occur within thirty (30) days of demand.
Funds recaptured by King County shall be returned to DCD. In the
event that King County is required to institute legal proceedings
to enforce the recapture provision, or is required to participate
in legal proceedings as a result of the Municipal Jurisdiction's
noncompliance with the provisions of this Agreement, or is
required to reimburse the State of Washington for the cost of
legal proceedings, then King County shall be entitled to reim-
bursement of its costs from the Municipal Jurisdiction, including
reasonable attorney's fees.
XV. NONDISCRIMINATION
There shall be no discrimination against any employee or independent
contractor paid by any funds which are the subject of this Agreement or
against any applicant for such employment because of race, religion,
color, sex, age, sexual orientation, handicap, or national origin. This
provision shall include, but not be limited to the following: employ-
ment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment, advertising, lay-off
or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selec-
tion for training.
The Municipal Jurisdiction and any independent contractor paid by funds
which are the subject of this Agreement shall comply with the require-
ments of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended.
XVI. RIGHTS TO OTHER PARTIES
It is understood and agreed that this Agreement is solely for the bene-·
fit of the parties hereto and conveys no right to any other party.
XVII. GOVERNING LAW AND FILING
This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and
the validity and performance hereof shall be governed by, the laws of
the State of Washington. This Agreement shall be filed with the city
clerk of the Municipal Jurisdiction, the King County Records and Elec-
tion Division, and the State of Washington Department of Community
Development.
8
XVIII. ADMINISTRATION
A. King County's representative shall be
------------------------
Address:
Phone:
B. The Municipal Jurisdiction's representative shall be
Address:
Phone:
XIX. ENTIRE AGREEMENT/WAIVER OF DEFAULT
The parties agree that this Agreement is the complete expression of the
terms hereto and any oral representations or understandings not incorpo-
rated herein are excluded. Both parties recognize that time is of the
essence in the performance of the provisions of this Agreement. Waiver
of any default shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent
default. Waiver or breach of any provision of the Agreement shall not
be deemed to be waiver of any other or subsequent breach and shall not
be construed to be a modification of the terms of the Agreement unless
stated to be such through written approval by King County, which shall
be attached to the original Agreement.
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
King County Executive
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
approved as to form only by
King County Prosecuting Attorney
per memorandum dated 11/4/93
c\ords\agmt
MUNICIPAL JURISDICTION
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Signature
Official Title
ATTACHMENT 1
COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES PHASE II
WORK PROGRAM
TASK
-·
A COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POUCIES: OVERVIEW
Countywide Planning Policies Adopted
Policy Refinements ·
(housing, economic development, rural)
B. FIStED TASK FORCE
Draft Economic Development Policies -Completed
Final Draft Econ_9mi~evelopment Policies -Completed
4/1/94 Rework EDP's Subsequent to DEIS
Draft Case Studies
Refine Case Studies
Draft ED Policies Benchmarks /Indicators
Final ED Policies Benchmarks /Indicators
Refine Benchmarks post DEIS
Draft Regional Finance Strategy Defined
Refine Fina11ce Strategy post draft Comprehensive
Plan Rev1ew
Policy Model -Phase I Completed
Marginal Cost Study Developed
Infrastructure Pricing and Values Study Prepared
Final Report -Dra1t
Final Report -Final
C. RURAL CHARACTER TASK FORCE
Policy Refinements
D. AFFORDABLE HOUSING TASK FORCE
Implementation Actions Report
Convene Exslting Needs Task Force
Ratify Refined County'Mde Housing Policies
E. TRANPORTATION CAUCUS
Level-of-Service
IS TEA
Concurrency
Transportation Bements and Plans
Draft Multicounty Transportation Policies
RTP-GMA Unk
TDM/CTR
Impact Fees
F. Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement
Task Force Work Analyzed
Impact Analysis
SEIS Advisory Committee Review
Draft SEIS completed
SEIS Public Involvement Workshops
DATE
7/6/92
7/93-3/94
5/17/93
7/6/93
4/94-6/94
7/7/93
9/93
10/19/93
11/2/93
9/7/93
11/29/93
11/16/93
4/4/94
5/94
5/17/94
5/93
10/1/93
10/1/93
4/94
6/11/93
8/10/93
11/9/93
10/12/93
10/12/93
11/9/93
11/9/93
5/94
7/93
8/93
10/93
11/22/93
11/12/93
End· of Comment Period
· Preferred Alternative/Phase II County-Mde Planning Policies
Impact Analysis Preferred Alternative
Final SEIS
G. POPULATION/EMPLOYMENT TARGETS
Draft Geographic Distribution by Alternative
Formal Geographic Distribution by Alternative
Refinements of Draft Target for Uninc. Ping. Areas
Targets due in from jurisdictions
Refinements of Draft Target for Cities
H. BENCHMARKS AND MONITORING
Identify/Establish Public-Private Advisory Group
Identify Benchmarks Required by CPP
ldentJty Benchmarks/Indicators for Economic
Performance and Employment within the Region
Develop Baseline Data/Maps for Required
Benchmarks
I. POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREAS
ID conflicts, over1aps of city PAA's
ID KC issues regarding PAA's
Initiate public process on PAA's
Facilitate PAA Subcommittee
Conduct Public Involvement Process for PAA's
Responsibility for Provision of Urban Services
PAA's adopt in jurisdiction Comp. Plans
Initiate KC/Cities discussion on Dev. Regs.
and inter1ocals .
Finafize PAA designations and boundary interfocals
J. PLAN LEVEL CONCURRENCY
Definition
Policies
ID Facility Service Levels
~2!93
0~/94
02/94
3-4/94
6/~6/93
8/1/93
8/15/93
10/93
Winter '93
8/15/94
~0/31/94
12/93
12/94
10/15/93
10!15/93
10/15/94
bi-monthly
11/15/93
1/15/94
7/94
7/15/94
9/15/94
11/93
1/94
2/94
ID/Measure lnterjurisdictionallmpacts 3/94
K. SEWER AND WATER WORK GROUPS .
Ongoing discu.ssion of LOS and coordination with Concurrency Work Group
L. RURAL CITY UGA
Public Workshops 6/93-7/93
UGA's preliminary report 9/93
UGA Final Staff Report 10/93
Uaison Group Review 11/93
GMPC review 11/93
County Council Review 12/93
Jnter1ocal Agreements re: Boundary Issues 12/93-7/94
{. PUBUC INVOLVEMENT STRATEGY 8/93-4/94
RFP Developed 6/94
RFP Issued 8/30/93
Public Involvement Strategy Approved 10/93
nm/link-4/10-14-93
Growth Management Act Grant, 1993-95 Allocations to King County Jurisdictions
King County -countywide allocation
Amount reserved for countywide efforts •
Amount for distribution among jurisdictions
1993
Jurisdiction Po ulation Percent
.. <1,895.
Auburn 34,550 2.18%
.IJ.~~ri¥.:&~ . ) . >' •.. ·······••<285················· ········0.62%
Bellevue 89,710 5.65%
8Uh~f.)i~riirixi4) ? })·• 'i;SJ:5>••••••···· •·•·:• oJo%···· >"
Bothen•• 13,050 0.82%
slif{i;f / • ····.· /• <·.2?,612< ·····•············1;74%
Carnation
Des Moines btviiLY'············ ..
1,360
·> 2.99o••·•·· 0.09%
0.19%
19,460 1.23% . .••..• ····3,2()() < ...•. ·.· .•.. O.ZO% .• ·.·••·· ....
Base
$7,770
····•$t4,sso•·•
$14,580
.. · .. ·.·.·· .. ·.··.·.·.
$14;580
$14,580
$14,580 •.
$2,557,411
($490,000)
$2,067,411
Per Ca ita
1,899
34,620 .
. 286·•····
89,893
1,578
13,077
·······:27,668.
1,363
2,996
19,500
3,207
Base
Grant$$
in 1994
104,473
16;158
$14,580
Grant$$
in 1993
11/09/93
twk C:GMA94GRT
Difference
1993-1994
$5,366
30,608 $18,592
· ··•·•· Io.tn••·•· · /. $4,694
.·.· .. 63,284 .·.·. $41,189
•· •••·• 10,914 ·· .·.······• $s,i44
20,846 17,412 $3,434
. .i 42,248 •.••. · ••••. < .· ••.•..•..•.••..•.•. 32,983 ( < •.. ·• .•. < $9,265
15,943 10,768 $5,175
· · 17,576 ·· · ii.793 ·· ··. <ss;783 ·
34,080 20,930. .. .. $13,150
. .. .h.7,7if 11,880 .. . . $5,9¢
Enumclaw 9,205 0.58% $14,580 9,224 ·· .. 23,804 15,269 $8,535
:F~~ei~I'W~:Y / <···· ·•••• ··• 7~;32A) >•· ·. i4.14%.•·•···· ·· ···•········•st4,sso 75,474 ···•.:.9o,o54• •·• ········>.·s3,5ii/ · · ). < $:36,533
Hunts Point 502 0.03% $14,580 503 15,083 10,310 $4,773
t~s:;;(iiiili :y···· ·········•·•· <' .8;~:26 > ... ··•)o.sz%·········· ·.·.·· .. · .. ·.····••sl4,s8oi •• •·······•········ ·. )8,343 ·········•··<>>2:2,923>.·< · <i4,?i8./ ·•·••·•• .')s8;0()5
Kent 41,090 2.59% $14,580 .· .··.· .. ··· 41,174 . 55,754 .·. 34,242 $21,512
·I.¢:i~.A?~~tY•?tn•. •f•••···.·:r? u .• •>:·~iJ,%jKE •.•·•·•••·••• i3i.ii%•.••···• ••·.··••···••· .u·•.st4,s8o••••·••···· ···•·· ·····:•·•····•512;661 •······•·•••527,241 .. ·•• ........ ·.···•·•·•t•.·••••····•307,3s()•.•.nu .•xJ•·•••·•.• $2i?,8~i.
Kirkland 41,700 2.63% $14,580 41,785 56,365 34,897 $21,468
i%f~.f~Ilf1¥k' i• i 3,4o5. ········• <oil.% >···•···· •········•J$i4,sso ....... •• .. 3,412 ········17,9%•··· ·····>>12,126 L.· ·• >ss,\366
Medina 3,000 0.19% $14,580 3,006 17,586 11,793 $5,793
'M~'*j~tiJjij ? >' . ii,i¥< /. · L34%: $i4;58o:·· ·····.···i 21,303 · ·· · .•.••• 35,Ss3 · · >(22,7Ss )\•••••· •.•.: /$h,ii5
Milton•• 760 0.05% $2,143 762 2,905 1,698 $1,207
••·• 6~89{) )·.·····.··· ·• o)h%•······ · <s14,s8o·•.•.· ·. ·,6,9o4••··•············ •···· 2i,484.••• / ' 14,12.6 > $7;3~8
0.17% $14,580 2,625 . 17,205 11,570 $5,635
(1.32% · ) sl4,sso •· · 5,171 ~~.is1 > h,ois< <. $6,716
Redmond 40,170 2.53% $14,580 40,252 54,832 33,484 $21,348
iidiiri.h :r{ •••••••••·•••.}·>• • •<:.:····~3,;j-?o?H .. · :•··•·•··•••·z.74% >.·········· ·····················••:si4,5so·················· •··•· ··••>••.•43,559•··•·····•········ ··········•·•··.·.·.:.ss;I39•··<······· ....•••.•.•••... ·.•H•·3$,920.•.r····· ·•·•·•····.········i.•s22,2i9
22,840 1.44% $14,580 ... ··. 22,887 37,467 23,733 $13,734
$~ui.MH • · • : •. .,5~7d<l9H ~.24% > •·•· >)si4,58() <.•··•··•·· ····•·•• 528,7J6·• ......... ):·.·•:•.543;356 < < ······•<.>323,99~( •·•·• s21!1.~s'7
SeaTac
Skykomish 250 0.02% $14,580 251 14,831 10,159 $4,672
~~~-q~~hili.¥!. \ •n • n .i;~;w. &i9% (. > si4;s~o··.··· ···· ······•·•iti.s48 /··• ·······•· c :16.i28 s ?< < •• < 1o;92Q << ·•· Yss,2oo
Tukwila 14,810 0.93% $14,580 14,840 29,420 18,812 $10,608
Wc:i~di.~.jiri~/ <•······· • • • L ~.4ch <•····· •··.•o.59% •···•···· · ••·•· si4;sso·····.····· · ·••· 9,426·•· · ··•····••···· •• 24,006··•··· •········ ·· •·· ••> 14,933 J•:··· / $9,oi.3
Yarrow Point 965 15,547 10,580 $4,967
Ci6ih1.t·· ··i~Ib FriliJ~ •r· ··············· ··· .·.·
! .. Tot.ar:>•··········· ···•···•·•···•·••··•·•··••••}•••···•·· ····••<1;5873oo·····. $476:473.
I GranFDistributioiiJt A11ocated by Caucus I
King County 511,618 32.22% 14,580
S~ttie >··················· ··.·.·········· 52'7,766).· · ......... :33.24% )········ .. ····•·sl4,58() .•.
Suburban 548,382 34.54% $447,313
&llilt: ····· id~·.F:Jrias•.H •••·> ·····················
. .. ·.·• ·• ····•1.587;700 .• ·• .... ·. ··1oo% . •.· $476,473.
··.· ·.·.·. A9o,()()o 482,o()o < • •· . . . $8,()00
· ·. $1;590.938. · • • $2.557,411 ···•··<sL754.o4o • •· · ... · ·· • •• $803371 I
512,661 .....
528;776·······:•>
549,500
1.590.938
527,241
'543,356 .··
307,380 $219,861
32.3.999 / ) } $ii9,351
996,813 640,661 $356,152
••····•·4w,ooo·•·•····· ·······•· < 48i,ooo······· ··· · ss,ooo
2.557.411 1;754.040 .• $8033711
' Coontywide allocaion ($490,000 trul): Fiscal analysis ($175,000), SEIS and Public Involvement ($100.000), Envirmmental/Piscal Summary Document ($15,000), Staff Work ($200,000)
The $200,000 reserved for Staff Work is to be distributed as follows: Metropolitan King Crunty -$80,000, Sururban Cities -$70,000, Cty of Seatle -$50,000.
" Bothell (53.29%) a1d Milton (14.70%) receive a rroportionate share of the base amoont, based on the portion of population in KingCrunty.
NOTE: CC.ts to be billed per caucus in 1994 include meding space and refreshments, and rrinting costs.
LIAISON GROUP RECOMMENDED: 10-18-93/NM/GRNTSMRY
GMA GRANT, 1994 ALLOCATIONS TO
KING COUNTY JURISDICTIONS
.·<. •···. ····•··· ·-·· ScenariO. > •... _ •. · I ·-.. · .• sase·· . I -.. _ Distribution Off~The'-"Top .
A.1 I $14,580 I Per Capita $490,000
*Base= 1993 base ($10,000) * GMA grant increase from 1993 to 1994 (45.8%)
IG6untyvvidef•ott-the~top .. )Summary: · I
Fiscal Analysis
SElS (finai}/Publiclnvolv.
Summary Doc.
Staff Work
$490,000
$175,000
$100,000
$15,000
$200,000.
F isca I Ana I ys is r--.-___,..~___,..~=-=-'"~::-7'-1
SEIS (final)
Summary Doc.
~~~~~~~~~
Public lnvolv.
Staff Work
iGotintYwid~e~o.ff Hth¢·.· top·~)Objectives:.··-.••... ·-·•·
Fiscal Analysis
SEIS (final)
Summary Doc.
Public lnvolv.
Staff Work
1993 County Funds were allocated to Marginal Cost Analysis, and Policy Model
Analysis; 1994 funds are designated for Infrastructure Costing and Values study;
Money will not be allocated until scope of work is approved by GMPC.
Respond to DEIS comments, analyze preferred alternative, prepare FSEIS, printing.
Consultant contract and printing of a summary document that ties together key
fiscal and environmental issues in a concise package for decisionmakers.
Public outreach for completion of Phase II of the Countywide Planning Policies,
including workshops, mailings and outreach assistance.
For work on GMPC Task Forces, Liaison Group and GMPC.
Note: Staff Work funding to be distributed as follows: $80,000 Metropolitan King County;
$70,000 Suburban Cities; $50,000 City of Seattle.
ATTACHMENT 3
PROPOSED GMA PROCESS
GMPC Liaison Group
(Open)
GMPCStaff
~
r ! ............................... ( ...............................
Affordable Rural FistEd SEIS Staff
Housing Character Task.Force Advisory Work
TaskForce TaskForce Group Groups
I I
Affordable Regional
Housing Financing
WorkGroup Work
Group
r I I I 1 I 1
Transportation Potential Data Urban Centers/
Sewer WorkGroup/ Annexation Concurrwcy Water Population &
WorkGroup Level-of-Service Area Technical WorkGroup WorkGrou~ Employment Fonnn Sub-Group Subcommittee
LIAISON GROUP:
Opeo participatioo ~core group iocJudiog MEtro and PSRC
BalaDce or disciplines, cities,
geograpbical pEI'SJ)Edi'fES mcouraged
Ageudas set by GMPC Staff Team
Pro'fide~ 81111
iata'di9cipliuary forum for
infomiatioo and policy~
GMPC Stafi;
J:)eggnalt!d by Caucuses •
FUNCTIONS & RESPONSIBILITIFS:
PrO'fide bistorical pet specti'fe and discqDJary balance in
GMPC process
Subconmittee
AftEr Liaisoo Group rmew, coordinate products of staff Work
Groups and Task ForcES, coordinate schedules ood informati011
eKChaoge with and betweEn TIL'lk Fon:ES and Work Groups.
De'felop recommmdafiom BDd altematins for GMPC reriew
and actioo
Coordinate wock of TIL'lk ForcES with GMPC schedules.
Review Ta Force recommEOdalioas and pnnide
additiooal input to GMPC ~ appropiate 011 compatibility
of recommmdaboDS and impacts Oil Comrl:ymde Plauniog
Policies
BriEl elected officials and eusure timely advice to caucuses 8Dd
GMPC