HomeMy WebLinkAbout1342WHEREAS,
RESOLUTION NO. (3 <-/,).__
A RESOLUTION of the City
Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, proposing to annex
certain real property located within
the city limits of the City of
SeaTac, Washington.
the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle, a
Washington municipal corporation ("Metro") , is the owner of certain
real property located in King County, Washington, which is legally
described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by
this reference and which is shown as area "X" on the attached map,
incorporated herein as Exhibit C; and
WHEREAS, the State of Washington, through the Washington State
Department of Transportation ( "WSDOT") is the owner of certain real
property located in King County, Washington, which is located in an
area legally described in Exhibit A and which is indicated as area
"Y" on Exhibit C; and
WHEREAS, King county, Washington, through its Department of
Parks and Recreation, is the owner of certain real property located
in King County, Washington, which is legally described in Exhibit
B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and
which is indicated a area "Z" on Exhibit C; and
WHEREAS, the property described in Exhibit A is located within
the city limits of the City of SeaTac, a Washington municipal
corporation ("SeaTac"); and
WHEREAS, the property described in Exhibit B is located within
the city limits of the City of Kent, a Washington municipal
corporation ("Kent"); and
..... ....... ,
= (..:")
,-, .. ,
= r::::t
WHEREAS, Metro owns and operates a "Park 'N Ride" facility on
property adjacent to a portion of the property indicated as area
"X" on Exhibit C; and
WHEREAS, Metro's existing "Park 'N Ride" facility is located
within the city limits of the City of Kent, a Washington municipal
corporation ("Kent"); and
WHEREAS, Metro plans to expand its existing "Park 'N Ride"
facility to encompass the property indicated as area "X" on Exhibit
C; and
WHEREAS, Metro desires that its planned expanded "Park 'N
Ride" facility be located entirely within the jurisdiction of Kent,
Washington; and
WHEREAS, Metro has conducted meetings with various
N representatives of SeaTac and Kent wherein Metro has asked both
~ cities to consider deannexing the property described in Exhibit A ~
~ from SeaTac and annexing that property to Kent; and
'!1""4
~
~ WHEREAS, the City of Kent surrounds much of the boundary of 0
~ the property described in Exhibit A; and
(f)
WHEREAS, the property described in Exhibit A more
appropriately fits within the logical boundaries of the City of
Kent; and
WHEREAS, the property described in Exhibit B represents a
portion of Grandview Park, the remainder of which lies entirely
within the city limits of the City of SeaTac; and
WHEREAS, the City of SeaTac will, by law, become the sole
owner of Grandview Park on or before 1995; and
2
WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the Cities of Kent and
SeaTac that SeaTac have and retain control over all of Grandview
Park; and
WHEREAS, the City of Kent, having deliberated upon these
issues with representatives of SeaTac and Metro, has determined
that it is in the best interest of all parties to annex the
property described in Exhibit A to the jurisdiction of Kent; and
WHEREAS, the City of Kent, having deliberated upon these
issues with representatives of SeaTac and Metro, has determined
that it is in the best interest of each party to annex the property
described in Exhibit B to the jurisdiction of SeaTac; and
WHEREAS, on December 24, 1992, the City, as the Lead Agency,
issued a Determination of Nonsignificance ("DNS") after review of
the completed environmental checklist, which was filed concerning
this deannexationjannexation; and
WHEREAS, Kent desires to initiate the statutory proceedings
necessary to annex those portions of SeaTac described in Exhibit A
and to deannex that portion of Kent described in Exhibit B, all of
which is indicated on Exhibit c, with the intent and understanding
that SeaTac will be agreeable to annexing and deannexing those
properties; and
WHEREAS, under the authority of RCW 35.10.217(2), Kent may
initiate this annexationjdeannexation process by adopting a
resolution indicating its desire to annex a part of another city
and its desire to be annexed, in part, to another city; NOW,
THEREFORE,
The City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, does hereby
resolve as follows:
3
Section 1. The City of Kent proposes that certain real
property located within the city limits of the City of SeaTac, King
County, Washington, which property is legally described in Exhibit
A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, be
deannexed from the city of SeaTac and annexed to the City of Kent.
Section 2. The City of Kent proposes that certain real
property located within the city limits of the City of Kent, King
County, Washington, which property is legally described in Exhibit
B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, be
deannexed from the City of Kent and annexed to the City of SeaTac.
Section 3. A certified copy of this Resolution shall be
transmitted to the city of SeaTac.
N
~ ~ Section 4. The Planning Department of the City of Kent shall
~ prepare and file all documents· necessary to provide proper notice
~ to and to become potentially subject to review by the King County
~ ~ Boundary Review Board.
~
'f)
Section 5. The city of Kent requests that the city of SeaTac
hold a public hearing before adopting its resolution agreeing to
the deannexationjannexation only after the proposed annexation has
been approved by the King County Boundary Review Board, in
accordance with RCW 35.10.217(2).
Section 6. The City of Kent requests that the City of SeaTac
mail notices of the public hearing on the proposed
deannexationjannexation in the same manner that notices of a
hearing on a proposed local improvement district are required to be
mailed by as provided in Chapter 35.43 Revised Code of Washington,
in accordance with RCW 35.10.217(2).
Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council
Kent, Washington, this /"' day
4
oo ''--~ 7" , of the City of
19~
Concurred
(J"·~<'!j
ATTEST:
~dL£J
BRENDA JACOBER,
:~
in by the Mayor of the city of Kent, this ~
, 19~~
(·
\ '~ J\.-: ~ \__ ---DAN kELLEHER, MAYOR
a_~~
CLERK
day
~ APPROVED AS TO FORM:
·~
\-4
-~
tn
0
'""' :j')
I hereby certify that this
Resolution No. I 3 l(d-..... , passed
of Kent 1 Washington 1 on the 11
is a true and correct copy of
by the City Council of the City
day o5-4o~~/ 1 19921>
0
.£._~-=,j::..___ /_ic.._'---t-1. £_. I_:J-,4---+-o_.e.._~_-· ·EM{
CITY CLERK
ANNXDNX2.pln
5
AREA TO BE DEANNEXED BY THE CITY OF SEATAC
AND ANNEXED BY THE CITY OF KENT
Legal Description
10/9/92
That portion of Sections 15 and 16, Township 22 North, Range 4
East, W.M. described as follows:
Commencing at the Northwest corner of the Southwest quarter of said
Section 15;
Thence South 00°38 1 16 11 East along the West line of said Section 15,
a distance of 838.96 feet to the Northeasterly margin of Kent-Des
Moines Road (State Secondary Highway 5-A);
Thence South 40°28 1 16" East along said Northeasterly margin 162.97
feet to the True Point of Beginning;
Thence North 74°15 1 East, along the North line of that area annexed
to the City of Kent by Ordinance 1089, to its intersection with the
Easterly margin of Primary State Highway No. 1 (Interstate Highway
No. 5), hereby designated Point A;
Thence Northerly along said Easterly margin of Primary State
Highway No. 1 to the Northwest corner of that area annexed to the
City of Kent by Ordinance 1317 (said Northwest corner described as: .
Commencing at said Point A; thence North 74°15 1 East to the Westerly
margin of Old Military Road as now revised; thence North 26°44 1 20"
West along said Westerly margin 163.42 feet; thence South 74°15 1
West to the said Easterly margin of Primary State Highway No. 1 and
the Northwest corner of said Ordinance 1317;
Thence North 74°15 1 East, along the North line of said Ordinance
1317, to the said Westerly margin of Old Military Road;
Thence North 26°44 1 20 11 West along the said Westerly margin (also a
Westerly line of that area annexed to the City of Kent by Ordinance
1089) a distance of 239.69 feet;
Thence South 74°57 I 30 11 West along a Southerly line of said Ordinance
1089, to the said Easterly margin of Primary state Highway No. 1;
Thence Northerly and Westerly along said Easterly margin (also a
Westerly line of that area annexed to the City of Kent by
Ordinances 1089 and 2120) to its intersection with the North line
of the South 55 feet of the North 515 feet of the Southwest quarter
of the Northwest quarter of said Section 15;
Thence Westerly along said North line of said South 55 feet and the
Westerly extension thereof to its intersection with the Westerly
margin of said Primary State Highway No. 1;
EXHIBIT ..A.JZI7AC,r:1
jZ-
Thence Southerly along said Westerly margin and the southerly
extension thereof as shown on Plan Primary State Highway No. 1 (SR
5) Pierce County line to Junction SSH 5-A (SR 516) sheet 6 of 6
approved July 15, 1958 (said margin is also an Easterly line of
that area annexed to the city of Des Moines by Ordinance 356) to
the centerline of SR 516;
Thence Southeasterly along said centerline (also the Northerly line
of that area annexed to the City of Kent by Ordinance 1124) to the
said West line of said Section 15;
Thence South 00°38' 16" East along said West line (also the East line
of said Annexation Ordinance 1124) to the centerline of said Kent-
Des Moines Road (SSH-5A);
Thence Southeasterly along said centerline (also the Northerly line
of that area annexed to the City of Kent by Ordinance 1091) to a
point which bears South 74°15' West from the True Point of
Beginning;
Thence North 74°15' East along the North line of said Annexation
Ordinance 1189 to the True Point of Beginning.
D297
LEG.AL DESCRIPTION .FOR PORTION OF GRAND VIEW PARK LOCATED WITHIN THE
-'CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
A parcel of land in the NW~ of Section 15, Township 22 North, Range
4 East, W.M., in King Co~nty, washington, described as follows:
Beginning at the NW corner of the west half of the NE~ of the NW~;
thence easterly along th~ north line thereof a distance of 663.60
feet to the NE corner of ~aid west half; th~nce southerly along the
east line the~eef eo ehe Nw corner of the west 275 £e$t of the SE~
of the NE~ of the NW~ o&' said Section 15, which point is on the
City of Kent boundary lin as established by city of Kent Ordinance
No. 1036 and is on the Ci y of SeaTac boundary line as established
by King County Ordin~nc~ No. 8820, and which point is the True
Point of Beginning; then e easterly along the North line of said
SE~ ·of tl'le NE~ of the\NW3-.t a distance of 275 feet; thence southerly
to the SE corner of s~id west 275 feet of the SE~ of the NE~ of the
NW~; thence westerly 'lon!g the south line thereof to a point which
is 879.74 feet east of the SW corner of the NE~ of the NW~; thence
south 40°21 1 west 203 .• 85. feet; thence south 0°57 1 east 93.0 feet;
thence_ south 75°00' test 1 to a point on the City of Kent boundary
line·· as established .pY ~aid Ordinance No, 103 6 and the city of
SeaTac boundary line ~s e~tablished by said Ordinance No. 8820 1 and
which is south of the1Tru~ Point of Beginning; thence north to the
True Point of Beginni~g. j
I
I
I
I
EXHIBIT~
,, . ,,
•' •\ .,
'• A Oo ,, ,, _,,
:--.
6
TO BE DEANNEXED iY KENT·
AND ANNEXED BY SEA-TAC
011 ic Ht·ooh ~
l.04/IL.
tlc.il C. 8ornc.lt
l..l~l\c..
GRANDVIEW
nq County Parks a Recreation
Jl.lO At.
Gr I r r en & Jcnstn
,,
1\<'<]er'i.~tlotor(
Y: 1o.oo
" " " " ,, ,, ,,
~: crj:
)l.cnr W1ghlond~
u.b3 lc
DEANNEXED BY SEA-TAC
ANNEXED BY KENT