Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1342WHEREAS, RESOLUTION NO. (3 <-/,).__ A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, proposing to annex certain real property located within the city limits of the City of SeaTac, Washington. the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle, a Washington municipal corporation ("Metro") , is the owner of certain real property located in King County, Washington, which is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and which is shown as area "X" on the attached map, incorporated herein as Exhibit C; and WHEREAS, the State of Washington, through the Washington State Department of Transportation ( "WSDOT") is the owner of certain real property located in King County, Washington, which is located in an area legally described in Exhibit A and which is indicated as area "Y" on Exhibit C; and WHEREAS, King county, Washington, through its Department of Parks and Recreation, is the owner of certain real property located in King County, Washington, which is legally described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and which is indicated a area "Z" on Exhibit C; and WHEREAS, the property described in Exhibit A is located within the city limits of the City of SeaTac, a Washington municipal corporation ("SeaTac"); and WHEREAS, the property described in Exhibit B is located within the city limits of the City of Kent, a Washington municipal corporation ("Kent"); and ..... ....... , = (..:") ,-, .. , = r::::t WHEREAS, Metro owns and operates a "Park 'N Ride" facility on property adjacent to a portion of the property indicated as area "X" on Exhibit C; and WHEREAS, Metro's existing "Park 'N Ride" facility is located within the city limits of the City of Kent, a Washington municipal corporation ("Kent"); and WHEREAS, Metro plans to expand its existing "Park 'N Ride" facility to encompass the property indicated as area "X" on Exhibit C; and WHEREAS, Metro desires that its planned expanded "Park 'N Ride" facility be located entirely within the jurisdiction of Kent, Washington; and WHEREAS, Metro has conducted meetings with various N representatives of SeaTac and Kent wherein Metro has asked both ~ cities to consider deannexing the property described in Exhibit A ~ ~ from SeaTac and annexing that property to Kent; and '!1""4 ~ ~ WHEREAS, the City of Kent surrounds much of the boundary of 0 ~ the property described in Exhibit A; and (f) WHEREAS, the property described in Exhibit A more appropriately fits within the logical boundaries of the City of Kent; and WHEREAS, the property described in Exhibit B represents a portion of Grandview Park, the remainder of which lies entirely within the city limits of the City of SeaTac; and WHEREAS, the City of SeaTac will, by law, become the sole owner of Grandview Park on or before 1995; and 2 WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the Cities of Kent and SeaTac that SeaTac have and retain control over all of Grandview Park; and WHEREAS, the City of Kent, having deliberated upon these issues with representatives of SeaTac and Metro, has determined that it is in the best interest of all parties to annex the property described in Exhibit A to the jurisdiction of Kent; and WHEREAS, the City of Kent, having deliberated upon these issues with representatives of SeaTac and Metro, has determined that it is in the best interest of each party to annex the property described in Exhibit B to the jurisdiction of SeaTac; and WHEREAS, on December 24, 1992, the City, as the Lead Agency, issued a Determination of Nonsignificance ("DNS") after review of the completed environmental checklist, which was filed concerning this deannexationjannexation; and WHEREAS, Kent desires to initiate the statutory proceedings necessary to annex those portions of SeaTac described in Exhibit A and to deannex that portion of Kent described in Exhibit B, all of which is indicated on Exhibit c, with the intent and understanding that SeaTac will be agreeable to annexing and deannexing those properties; and WHEREAS, under the authority of RCW 35.10.217(2), Kent may initiate this annexationjdeannexation process by adopting a resolution indicating its desire to annex a part of another city and its desire to be annexed, in part, to another city; NOW, THEREFORE, The City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, does hereby resolve as follows: 3 Section 1. The City of Kent proposes that certain real property located within the city limits of the City of SeaTac, King County, Washington, which property is legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, be deannexed from the city of SeaTac and annexed to the City of Kent. Section 2. The City of Kent proposes that certain real property located within the city limits of the City of Kent, King County, Washington, which property is legally described in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, be deannexed from the City of Kent and annexed to the City of SeaTac. Section 3. A certified copy of this Resolution shall be transmitted to the city of SeaTac. N ~ ~ Section 4. The Planning Department of the City of Kent shall ~ prepare and file all documents· necessary to provide proper notice ~ to and to become potentially subject to review by the King County ~ ~ Boundary Review Board. ~ 'f) Section 5. The city of Kent requests that the city of SeaTac hold a public hearing before adopting its resolution agreeing to the deannexationjannexation only after the proposed annexation has been approved by the King County Boundary Review Board, in accordance with RCW 35.10.217(2). Section 6. The City of Kent requests that the City of SeaTac mail notices of the public hearing on the proposed deannexationjannexation in the same manner that notices of a hearing on a proposed local improvement district are required to be mailed by as provided in Chapter 35.43 Revised Code of Washington, in accordance with RCW 35.10.217(2). Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council Kent, Washington, this /"' day 4 oo ''--~ 7" , of the City of 19~ Concurred (J"·~<'!j ATTEST: ~dL£J BRENDA JACOBER, :~ in by the Mayor of the city of Kent, this ~ , 19~~ (· \ '~ J\.-: ~ \__ ---DAN kELLEHER, MAYOR a_~~ CLERK day ~ APPROVED AS TO FORM: ·~ \-4 -~ tn 0 '""' :j') I hereby certify that this Resolution No. I 3 l(d-..... , passed of Kent 1 Washington 1 on the 11 is a true and correct copy of by the City Council of the City day o5-4o~~/ 1 19921> 0 .£._~-=,j::..___ /_ic.._'---t-1. £_. I_:J-,4---+-o_.e.._~_-· ·EM{ CITY CLERK ANNXDNX2.pln 5 AREA TO BE DEANNEXED BY THE CITY OF SEATAC AND ANNEXED BY THE CITY OF KENT Legal Description 10/9/92 That portion of Sections 15 and 16, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, W.M. described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of the Southwest quarter of said Section 15; Thence South 00°38 1 16 11 East along the West line of said Section 15, a distance of 838.96 feet to the Northeasterly margin of Kent-Des Moines Road (State Secondary Highway 5-A); Thence South 40°28 1 16" East along said Northeasterly margin 162.97 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence North 74°15 1 East, along the North line of that area annexed to the City of Kent by Ordinance 1089, to its intersection with the Easterly margin of Primary State Highway No. 1 (Interstate Highway No. 5), hereby designated Point A; Thence Northerly along said Easterly margin of Primary State Highway No. 1 to the Northwest corner of that area annexed to the City of Kent by Ordinance 1317 (said Northwest corner described as: . Commencing at said Point A; thence North 74°15 1 East to the Westerly margin of Old Military Road as now revised; thence North 26°44 1 20" West along said Westerly margin 163.42 feet; thence South 74°15 1 West to the said Easterly margin of Primary State Highway No. 1 and the Northwest corner of said Ordinance 1317; Thence North 74°15 1 East, along the North line of said Ordinance 1317, to the said Westerly margin of Old Military Road; Thence North 26°44 1 20 11 West along the said Westerly margin (also a Westerly line of that area annexed to the City of Kent by Ordinance 1089) a distance of 239.69 feet; Thence South 74°57 I 30 11 West along a Southerly line of said Ordinance 1089, to the said Easterly margin of Primary state Highway No. 1; Thence Northerly and Westerly along said Easterly margin (also a Westerly line of that area annexed to the City of Kent by Ordinances 1089 and 2120) to its intersection with the North line of the South 55 feet of the North 515 feet of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 15; Thence Westerly along said North line of said South 55 feet and the Westerly extension thereof to its intersection with the Westerly margin of said Primary State Highway No. 1; EXHIBIT ..A.JZI7AC,r:1 jZ- Thence Southerly along said Westerly margin and the southerly extension thereof as shown on Plan Primary State Highway No. 1 (SR 5) Pierce County line to Junction SSH 5-A (SR 516) sheet 6 of 6 approved July 15, 1958 (said margin is also an Easterly line of that area annexed to the city of Des Moines by Ordinance 356) to the centerline of SR 516; Thence Southeasterly along said centerline (also the Northerly line of that area annexed to the City of Kent by Ordinance 1124) to the said West line of said Section 15; Thence South 00°38' 16" East along said West line (also the East line of said Annexation Ordinance 1124) to the centerline of said Kent- Des Moines Road (SSH-5A); Thence Southeasterly along said centerline (also the Northerly line of that area annexed to the City of Kent by Ordinance 1091) to a point which bears South 74°15' West from the True Point of Beginning; Thence North 74°15' East along the North line of said Annexation Ordinance 1189 to the True Point of Beginning. D297 LEG.AL DESCRIPTION .FOR PORTION OF GRAND VIEW PARK LOCATED WITHIN THE -'CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON A parcel of land in the NW~ of Section 15, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King Co~nty, washington, described as follows: Beginning at the NW corner of the west half of the NE~ of the NW~; thence easterly along th~ north line thereof a distance of 663.60 feet to the NE corner of ~aid west half; th~nce southerly along the east line the~eef eo ehe Nw corner of the west 275 £e$t of the SE~ of the NE~ of the NW~ o&' said Section 15, which point is on the City of Kent boundary lin as established by city of Kent Ordinance No. 1036 and is on the Ci y of SeaTac boundary line as established by King County Ordin~nc~ No. 8820, and which point is the True Point of Beginning; then e easterly along the North line of said SE~ ·of tl'le NE~ of the\NW3-.t a distance of 275 feet; thence southerly to the SE corner of s~id west 275 feet of the SE~ of the NE~ of the NW~; thence westerly 'lon!g the south line thereof to a point which is 879.74 feet east of the SW corner of the NE~ of the NW~; thence south 40°21 1 west 203 .• 85. feet; thence south 0°57 1 east 93.0 feet; thence_ south 75°00' test 1 to a point on the City of Kent boundary line·· as established .pY ~aid Ordinance No, 103 6 and the city of SeaTac boundary line ~s e~tablished by said Ordinance No. 8820 1 and which is south of the1Tru~ Point of Beginning; thence north to the True Point of Beginni~g. j I I I I EXHIBIT~ ,, . ,, •' •\ ., '• A Oo ,, ,, _,, :--. 6 TO BE DEANNEXED iY KENT· AND ANNEXED BY SEA-TAC 011 ic Ht·ooh ~ l.04/IL. tlc.il C. 8ornc.lt l..l~l\c.. GRANDVIEW nq County Parks a Recreation Jl.lO At. Gr I r r en & Jcnstn ,, 1\<'<]er'i.~tlotor( Y: 1o.oo " " " " ,, ,, ,, ~: crj: )l.cnr W1ghlond~ u.b3 lc DEANNEXED BY SEA-TAC ANNEXED BY KENT