HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Committees - Parks and Human Services - 09/19/2013 Parks and Human Services Committee
KENTW�SNINGTON Meeting Minutes for September 19, 2013
Council Committee members Present: Chair Debbie Ranniger, Dana Ralph,
Elizabeth Albertson
Chair Debbie Ranniger called the meeting to order at 5:03 p.m.
Item 1: Minutes of July 18, 2013 - Approve
MOTION: Committee member Ralph moved to approve the minutes dated
July 18, 2013. Committee member Albertson seconded. The motion passed
3-0.
Item 2: 2014 Washington State Arts Commission Proiect Support Grant — Accept
Superintendent of Recreation and Cultural Programs Lori Hogan shared that once
again the amazing staff in our Cultural Division applied for and received the
Washington State Arts Commission (WSAC) program support grant for 2014. Kent
Arts Commission will use the funding to support the presentation of performances
and educational outreach activities by Keola Beamer, Moanalani Beamer and R.
Carlos Nakai (world music and dance), as well as California Guitar Trio and Montreal
Guitar Trio (classical and world guitar) as part of the Spotlight Series.
MOTION: Committee member Albertson moved to recommend accepting
the $3,950.00 grant from Washington State Arts Commission and
approving the expenditure of funds in the Kent Arts Commission's budget.
Committee member Ralph seconded. The motion passed 3-0.
Item 3: New Connections Lease Agreement — Authorize
Superintendent of Facilities Alex Ackley reported that New Connections, a nonprofit
agency serving Kent residents, has been a tenant in the city-owned building located
at 412 West Titus Street since June, 2003. The condition of the current location is
no longer adequate to run the tenant's programs, therefore, the tenant will be
moving to the city-owned building located next door at 422 W. Titus. In
consideration of this 5-year agreement, the Lessee pays all costs associated with or
arising out of the maintenance, operation, and agreed upon tenant improvements
(Exhibit B) of the leased premise, in lieu of paying rent. The Lessee will also pay a
monthly Leasehold Excise Tax in the amount of $267.30 based on an estimated fair
market value rental of $2,349.00 per month.
Through an agreement with DSHS under their Career Path Services Program, New
Connections provides six to twelve months of training for individuals in their office
(paid for by DSHS) and working with the Police Department and Corrections staff.
During the last year, New Connections trained several individuals in work and office
Page 1
skills and gained valuable (no-cost) employees which allowed them to provide
extremely low cost assistance.
The motion was corrected by eliminating "St. Vincent de Paul" from the lessee
name.
MOTION: Committee member Ralph moved to recommend Council
authorize the Mayor to sign the Lease Agreement with New Connections to
rent the city-owned building located at 422 West Titus Street, subject to
final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and the Parks
Director. Committee member Albertson seconded. The motion passed 3-0.
Item 4: GreenPlay Agreement — Authorize
Parks Director Jeff Watling and Superintendent Lori Hogan reiterated that at the
2013 City Council Retreat, Council identified a number of priority items from the
Efficiency Study, conducted by BERK and Associates, to further explore and discuss.
One of those items under Level of Service was the review of recreation programs to
better understand and determine cost recovery. Watling recapped that staff
introduced an approach to this task proposed by GreenPlay LLC at the June 20
Parks Committee meeting. GreenPlay would utilize a pyramid methodology to
develop a cost recovery model and resource allocation philosophy for recreation
programs. The pyramid methodology has been successfully applied to several cities
and agencies throughout the country
Hogan spoke to Council's questions on the cost recovery of recreation programs
and services. The process begins with a series of workshops with city staff, elected
officials, business leaders, and residents. This group will meet 4-5 times in the next
5-6 months and talk in depth on what recreation services are offered, as well as the
impacts, values, and prioritization of these services. Discussion will include the
current fee structure and whether it is right-priced, or whether the fees need to be
adjusted. The intention of this process is to come away with a cost recovery model
and a philosophy that the Parks Department can apply to current and future
programs, services, and projects.
Committee member Ralph voiced concern for the staff time involved to implement
this scope of services. She feels that staff time is already limited. Hogan thanked
Ralph for her concern and agreed that it will take time to manage through the
process. She is hopeful that much of the information needed can be pulled from the
current registration system. It will be a big investment of time initially, but she
hopes that the resulting product will be well worth it and give us a better path
forward when it's done.
Watling feels that this will be a great management tool with existing programs and
can be used when considering programs in the future as well. Hogan added that
GreenPlay is very willing to work with the city. They have taken into account staff
time and spread the process over the calendar to accommodate staff schedules.
Page 2
Committee member Ralph said it feels like an efficiency study and again is
concerned that staff is already so lean. She wants to make sure the study looks at
the value of current programs. Hogan feels that it won't be a report on efficiencies,
and that the focus of the study will result in a product that shows; our programs
are serving a broad community, our services are right-priced, and that there is a
need and a value to our services in the community. Hogan noted that, if we find
there is an area that needs revisiting, then we will. She reiterated that it will be a
valuable tool to assist in measuring the value of our services.
Watling said, as we price the services, we understand there is a spectrum of city
investment. The intent was to address Council's questions on how we are investing
in recreational programming. He does feel this is an exercise of reviewing
efficiencies and not what can we get out of the business of doing. Committee Chair
Ranniger commented that the contract doesn't reference re-directing the city's
resources to some other focus. Elizabeth felt that it does and referred to the
pyramid model, focusing on the community benefit piece. Hogan remarked that it
would be a surprise if at the end of this analysis, there are services that need to be
removed. But, if that is the case, this model will be an effective tool for Council to
use in deciding what happens next.
Councilmember Ralph asked if this is the best use of $34,000. Watling responded
yes, it gives staff the tools and the opportunity to go deeper into how we analyze
costs. It's an investment that is well served. Committee Chair Ranniger was not
concerned with the size of the contract and felt the price was low.
Committee member Albertson liked that this method offers a process and a
structure to set up guidelines. She appreciates the public involvement process to
get input on creating the model that matches community needs. It's an opportunity
for outside opinions from a new perspective.
Committee member Albertson moved to recommend Council authorize the
Mayor to sign the agreement with GreenPlay in the amount of $33,950.00
for consulting services, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to
the City Attorney and the Parks Director. Committee member Ralph
seconded and the motion passed 3-0.
Council member Ralph requested this item be moved to Other Business on
the agenda so that the original goals can be discussed by full Council.
Item 5: Riverbend Golf Complex — INFO ONLY
Chair Ranniger stated that this informational item is more exploratory information
on the Riverbend Golf Complex and an endeavor to continue this conversation to
bring the golf complex to a more stable mode and still provide that asset to the
community. The report will explore some different financial structures and provide
next step guidance in the exploration for sustainability.
Page 3
Parks Director Watling stated that, as a follow-up to the September 3 City Council
Workshop discussion on Riverbend, three options were presented to address the
current financial issues within the Golf Fund. This presentation includes an overview
of each option, as well as an assessment of the advantages, disadvantages, and
policy implications for each of the three options to address. Watling noted the three
challenges within the golf fund:
1. Debt Repayment
2. Funding Capital Needs
3. Operational Sustainability
Options:
1. Enterprise — Outsource Management / Operations
Management Contract - Outsource
• Hire a management company to operate all aspects of Riverbend
Advantages:
• No change to Riverbend Complex
• Costs may be reduced due to labor cost reductions
• City relieved of day-to-day operation
Disadvantages:
• City funds all capital improvements
• City funds all debt re-payment
• Less control than self-operation
• Usually does not provide guaranteed income to owner
Policy Implications:
• This option does not directly address two of the most significant issues
within Golf Fund — debt re-payment and capital reinvestment
• Impact to current employees (both represented and non-represented)
Interim CAO Tom Brubaker interjected that, as an example, the city has a
management agreement with SMG for the Event Center. The city doesn't
know the entertainment business, so a company was contracted to operate
the facility. The city pays SMG to operate the facility and we are responsible
for the maintenance and repair of the facility, as well as making up the
difference if revenue is down.
Lease Agreement - Outsource
• Lease the facility to a private operator in exchange for an annual lease
payment to the City (similar to Riverbend's restaurant lease)
Advantages:
• No change to Riverbend Complex
• Burden of risk is partially shifted
Page 4
• City relieved of day-to-day operation
• Lessee could contribute to needed capital improvements
• Lessee to maintain equipment
Disadvantages:
• City has limited control. Public access is impacted.
• Laborissues
• Revenue constraint to City
• Longer term contract
• Unexpected golf market downturns
• Debt service re-payment may not be directly addressed. We need a $400-
600K return. A third party wants to make money.
Policy Implications:
• This option may not directly address two of the most significant issues
within Golf Fund — debt re-payment and capital
• Impact to current employees (both represented and non-represented)
• Balancing the roles of public asset and enterprise
Watling said there is always a challenge with striking the balance to push revenue
and encourage access. Whenever there is a third party involved in the operation of
an asset, the third party is in it to make money. As we noted from the public
meetings, entry point into golf is a core value. The city's role with public space is to
encourage public access. In a lease agreement, that is a delicate balance with a
partner.
Committee member Albertson referenced the role between municipal an all access
golf course and a private country club golf course. It's not the same market and we
play a different role in the industry.
Hybrid Management Contract
• In the 1980's and 1990's Riverbend was operated with a hybrid management
contract.
• Combines some aspects of both. Usually shorter term (3-5 years) and may
include all or part of the operations
2. Enterprise — Re-size the Operation
• Reduce the size of the Golf Complex
• Reduce operational costs
• Proceeds from sale would pay off debt and fund capital improvements
• Ensure Golf Complex remains accessible for all ages and all abilities
Advantages:
• Improve operational sustainability
• Proceeds from sale pay off interfund loan
• Proceeds from sale fund current and future capital investments
• Riverbend remains a public facility for all ages and abilities
Page 5
Watling reported that 48% of revenue comes from the 18-Hole, 42% from
the driving range/ pro shop and 10% of revenue comes from the Par 3. He
commented that, if we consider resizing, how we would provide current
services. Watling displayed conceptual maps that showed the potential of
turning property on the Par 3 side that would accommodate 3 holes and
multiple tee boxes - which provides six different practice areas, plus a
chipping and practice area. Riverbend Golf Complex Superintendent Pete
Petersen commented that, comparing the lengths of the holes on the
proposed conceptual design, two different tees and two flags would offer the
junior and senior groups a similar experience to the Par 3.
Watling responded to the concern of 9-hole players feeling intimated by the
18-hole course. He spoke of incorporating the national program played on18-
hole courses called, "Tee it Forward" which creates a set of tees that are
pushed way forward. This produces a golf experience for the beginners,
juniors, and seniors who want to play a shorter course. Staff hopes these
options stay true to our goal of remaining a public facility for all ages and
abilities.
Disadvantages
• Loss of public property
• Is there commercial interest in that property?
• Represents Change
Policy Implications:
• What would be the City's vision of re-development of this site?
• How does the City ensure an appealing project that will benefit the
community including public access into the site and along the Green
River?
• How does the City and Community work through the change that this
option would bring?
3. General Fund Budget — Transition Riverbend into the General Fund
Budget
Annualized Costs
• Total Annualized Costs: $665,000 - $1,075,000
o Debt Repayment of $2.25m
• 5 years: $475,000 per year
• 10 years: $265,000 per year
o Capital Needs: $350,000 - $400,000
o Operational Sustainability: $50,000 - $200,000
• Identify Funding within the General Fund
o Increase revenues, and/or
o Reduce/eliminate other General Fund programs
Page 6
Advantages:
• No change to Riverbend Golf Complex
• Interfund loan could be repaid through the General Fund
• Current and future capital needs could be addressed (depending on
funding and prioritization with other capital needs)
Disadvantages
• General Fund budget is currently very tight. Adding the golf complex will
likely mean the reduction or elimination of other general fund services
• Impact transferred to other services
• Operational sustainability may not be met
• Current and future Capital needs may not be addressed due to funding
priorities and availability within the broader Capital Budget
Policy Implications:
• Where does Riverbend fit into the General Fund Services priority now and
in the future?
• Shall funds from the Strategic Opportunity Fund be used? If so, how
much?
• What other services will be reduced or eliminated within the General
Fund?
CAO Brubaker commented that the city needs to look at other funds besides one-
time money for an ongoing issue. We need to look for reliable source.
Parks Director Watling referenced Council member Perry asking about using the
One Time Strategic Fund to pay the debt. Brubaker said this shouldn't be handled
through a one-time fund.
Committee member Albertson said it could eliminate the $2.25M debt, but doesn't
address the other financial issues.
CAO Brubaker referenced the challenges with the Seattle Public Utilities partnership
and the Highlands property. He said the city has been very successful with selling
city-owned property, such as Kent Station and The Platform and guaranteeing a
development fit. The city has good control in what happens with post sale; when we
are the seller.
Committee member Albertson understands the need to reduce the Par 3, but still
has a hard time with selling property when we haven't replaced the Commons fields
yet. She also understands it could be a wonderful community asset like Kent
Station and Town Square Plaza, with a public space that incorporates the river. She
doesn't have an answer as to where else the city can find the funds for the debt
service or a source for capital improvements.
Committee member Ralph agrees with Albertson, she's torn. She commented that
it's an amazing piece of property and an asset to the community. Business wise,
reducing the footprint makes sense and it would provide the funds for the city if
Page 7
sold, but her heart says she's not sure if it's the best choice and she hasn't come to
a resolution yet.
Committee Chair Ranniger senses that, before going any further, the city needs to
decide what the vision looks like and find out if there is any interest in developing
the property.
Committee member Albertson agreed that we need to know if there is interest
developing the property into a signature gateway — a river walk with restaurants
and public spaces. Adding that it would have to provide a civic benefit. Albertson
asked about creating a PUD.
Watling felt the group isn't in a place to make any decisions and more information
is needed. He feels the next step is to define the city's goals and vision, as well as
research market interest. After that, work with Economic Development to see if
there is market interest that matches these goals and vision, if we were to consider
development.
Committee member Ralph stated that the design needs to include the golf
educational portion as well. Watling shared that during his conversations with the
youth golf groups, First Tee voiced their interest in being a part of the re-sized
model and design.
Interim CAO Brubaker referenced an appraisal that was done on the property.
Based on the appraisal amount, he said it is likely the sale price would pay for the
debt service, the capital projects, and the operational efficiencies. If the property is
sold, it probably wouldn't be in one lump sum, but in payments. Brubaker will check
with Economic Development to look at options and see the possibilities of how the
payments would be structured.
Committee Chair Ranniger stated that we need to keep moving forward. We need
to review proposals from the interest groups and talk to Economic Development to
see if there is a market for the kind of vision that meets everyone's needs.
Watling reiterated next steps; review proposals from interest groups, define the
vision for potential development if the Par 3 is re-sized, and work with Economic
Development to see if there is commercial interest in the property.
Brubaker agreed that we need to find out if there is a development that meets the
vision of Council and the community.
Committee member Albertson referenced Tarragon Management and asked
Brubaker when the housing project will be completed. He plans to meet with
Tarragon to discuss the parameters of the development agreement.
Page 8
Item 6: Director's Report
• As outlined in the Asset Analysis, the Wilson Playfields Turf Replacement
project is our number one capital project in the 2013/2014 budget. Staff
found a way to fund project through a compilation of REET and other budget
funds. Also, the US Soccer Foundation invited us to apply for a grant (up to
$200,000) to help fund the Wilson Turf Replacement project.
• Kent Valley Loop Trail
The community and staff are very excited about the Valley Loop Trail project.
We have experienced a very strong response to the online survey with over
250 comments offering input on the project. The consultants will attend the
October Parks Committee meeting to assist staff in updating the committee.
• Spotlight Series Concerts kicked off this weekend with Late Night Catechism.
• Fall volunteer events begin September 28 with National Trails Day at Park
Orchard Park. We are fortunate to have huge participation in our volunteer
events. Without the support of our volunteers, Jeff feels we couldn't steward
our park system.
Chair Debbie Ranniger adjourned the meeting at 6:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Teri Petrole
TeY,� Pefivo(e
Council Committee Secretary
Page 9