HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Committees - Parks and Human Services - 08/27/2015 l a" ',RENt.
Parks & Human Services Committee Agenda
Councilmembers: Brenda Fincher - Dennis Higgins - Deborah Ranniger, Chair
August 27, 2015
5:00 P.M.
Item Description Action Speaker Time Page
1. Call to order Chair Ranniger 01
2. Roll Call Chair Ranniger 01
3. Changes to the Agenda Chair Ranniger 01 -
4. Approval of Minutes, dated June 25, YES Chair Ranniger 01 01
2015
5. 2015 Second Quarter Fee-in-Lieu Funds YES Hope Gibson 05 05
6. Animal Control - Ordinance Amending YES Jeff Watling, 10 09
Chapter 8.03 of the Kent City Code Tammy White
7. Kent Arts DIY (Do It Yourself) Project NO Ronda Billerbeck 10 27
Update
8. Riverbend Golf Complex - Water / Well NO Jeff Watling, 10 29
Update Pete Petersen
9. Director's Report NO Jeff Watling 10 31
Unless otherwise noted, the Parks and Human Services Committee meets at 5 p.m. on the fourth
Thursday of each month in Kent City Hall, Council Chambers East, 220 41h Ave S, Kent, 98032.
For additional information please contact Teri Petrole at 253-856-5100 or via email at
Wet roleCd KentWA.gov.
Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City Clerk's Office at
253-856-5725 in advance. For TOO relay service call Washington Telecommunications
Relay Service at 1-800-833-6388.
Page 1
T
Tes IY ! P
Parks and Human Services Committee Meeting Minutes
Council members: Brenda Fincher • Dennis Higgins • Deborah Ranniger, Chair
Director Jeff Watling
June 25, 2015 - 5:00 p.m.
1. Call to Order: Committee member Ranniger called the meeting to order at 5:02
p.m.
2. Roll Call: Councilmembers Bill Boyce and Jim Berrios attended the meeting as
alternates for Dennis Higgins and Brenda Fincher.
3. Changes to Agenda: Lori Hogan replaced Ronda Billerbeck as the speaker for
item 4.
4. Approval of Minutes:
Councilmember Boyce MOVED to approve the minutes dated May 28,
2015. Councilmember Berrios SECONDED. The motion PASSED 3-0.
S. TourWest Grants from WESTAF for 2015/2016 Programs
Lori Hogan, Superintendent of Recreation and Cultural Programs reported that
the Western States Arts Federation (WESTAF) has awarded the Kent Arts
Commission two TourWest grants in the amount of $2,125 each (maximum
award is $2,500) through a competitive grant process. The funding will support
the 2015-2016 Spotlight Series - specifically performances and community
outreach activities by Kenny Endo Contemporary Ensemble (Japanese Taiko
drumming and Jazz) and Antics Performance (Hip Hop dance).
Councilmember Berrios MOVED to recommend council authorize the
mayor to accept two TourWest grants from WESTAF in the amount of
$2,125 each ($4,250 total), amend the budget, sign all necessary
documents, and authorize expenditure of funds in accordance with the
grant agreement. Councilmember Boyce SECONDED. The motion
PASSED 3-0.
6. Animal Control - Ordinance Amending Chapter 8.03 of the Kent City
Code - Recommend Adoption
Watling and Tammy White, Assistant City Attorney reported that since July 1,
2010, the City of Kent and King County have been parties to an interlocal
agreement where King County provides regional animal control, sheltering, and
licensing services for the City of Kent and other King County agencies. The
Page 1
Page 2
current interlocal agreement was recently amended to remain effective through
December '31, 2017. Consistent with the interlocal agreement, the City of Kent
adopted Ordinance No. 3979 on October 19, 2010, which repealed many
provisions within Chapter 8.03 of the Kent City Code and adopted a number of
provisions of Title 11 of the King County Code related to animal licensing, fees,
penalties, enforcement, and sheltering.
Under the King County code, a leash requirement is enforced as a public
nuisance. Because there is no corresponding city code provision, a police officer
cannot take enforcement action or issue a ticket to dog's owner if a dog is off
leash and running at large in any place other than an authorized dog park or the
owner's property. An officer may only refer the complaint to animal control. This
ordinance creates a local code provision that explicitly requires dogs to be on a
leash when not within an authorized off-leash area or contained and controlled
on private property. Adoption of this ordinance would allow enforcement either
locally through the issuance of a ticket by either Kent police officers or King
County's Animal Control officers, or through King County's public nuisance code
enforcement process.
This ordinance also establishes an express requirement that any person who has
custody or control of an animal must remove any fecal matter deposited by that
animal on public property before leaving the immediate area where the fecal
matter was deposited. And, it requires that any person who has custody or
control of an animal ensures that its animal does not deposit fecal matter on the
private property of another without the consent of that property's owner or
tenant. Failure to comply with the ordinance is a violation that may be enforced
through the issuance of a civil infraction filed with the Kent Municipal Court. This
is the only means through which this violation will be enforced.
The ordinance also more clearly defines the relationship between the City of
Kent and King County in the provision of animal control, sheltering, and
licensing services.
Councilmembers and staff discussed details of the ordinance including specifics
of the Kent Code related to animals, the different classes for penalty fine, and
private property rights. Chair Debbie Ranniger asked how the city's policy
compares to other agencies. Ranniger also voiced her concern with the potential
for unsubstantiated blame that could arise between neighbors, as well as how
much time police officers would spend investigating all of the new claims. Staff
and council decided to take no action and table this item until additional
information is provided.
MOTION: No motion was made, the item was tabled.
Page 2
Page 3
7. Lower Russell Green River Levee Project
Watling updated the committee on the Lower Russell Green River Levee project
reporting that, of the 1-1/4 miles of the green river project that includes Van
Doren's Landing, staff plans to keep the project sensitive to key public
investments. The alternate plan blends all priorities of the project; creating a
levee, increasing habitat, and keeping the recreational opportunities. The
alternate plan was vetted with King County and King County Flood Control and
well received at the public meeting on June 8. It was also well supported at the
Design Workshop on June 17 by King County Council Executive Dave Uptegrove
and other local agencies. An interlocal agreement will ultimately be initiated. Jeff
will keep the committee informed.
S. Director's Report
• The Fourth of July Splash had over 15,000 residents participating in events
at Lake Meridian.
• The Summer Concert Series begin next week.
• The Parks and Open Space Plan survey is on Mykentparks.com. Staff and
Park Commissioners are attending numerous public outreach opportunities
this summer to gather comments and encourage people to take the survey
online. Over 120 surveys have been received already.
i
Councilmember Boyce asked about the purpose of the survey, knowing that
parks are already popular. Watling said that staff is seeking information on
what's important to the residents; to validate or assist the city in redirecting
efforts.
Councilmember Berrios asked if feedback from the survey includes parks that
are deemed unnecessary, based on lack of use. Watling responded yes and
that staff is redefining park categories in the updated plan, looking at open
spaces that shouldn't be considered parks because they have no recreational
amenities.
The meeting adjourned 5:38 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Twi Petroee
Teri Petrole
Kent City Council Committee Recorder
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
10ENOT
Jeff Watling, Director
Phone: 253-856-5100
Fax: 253-856-6050
Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S.
Kent, WA. 98032-5895
i
TO: Kent City Council Parks and Human Services Committee
DATE: August 27, 2015
FROM: Hope Gibson, Manager of Parks Planning and Development
SUBJECT: 2015 Second Quarter Fee-in-Lieu Funds
MOTION: Move to recommend accepting the $28,500 for Fee-in-Lieu funds
and amend the Community Parks Reinvestment Program budget for future
expenditures in the Linda Heights Park budget and the Kent Memorial Park
budget.
SUMMARY: Between April and June 2015 the City of Kent received a total of
$28,500 from the following developers who voluntarily paid fees in lieu of
dedicating park land to mitigate the development of single family homes in local
subdivisions. The funds will be used at the park locations as noted below.
Developer Asili Ahmad: $8,625 at Linda Heights Park
Developer Wayne Jones: $19,875 at Kent Memorial Park
EXHIBITS: Copy of Revenue Report
BUDGET IMPACT: Revenue and expense impacts: $8,625.00 to Linda Heights
Park budget and $19,875 to Kent Memorial Park budget
Page 6
i
Page 7
m
V !�
m a�a a
a
N
r �
m
N
� d
W
E
0
N
U
0
0
a
c
w �
m
c '
c - °
a T
- � m
a ❑ E
O N
Z O n
W O
C N O
U N M
u
4 12
T tl1 N
a
J I
0
U O
rs a i
m
N
u
o M M
M �
& O r I
(� r
O tp (p
in
o m
0
0
N `y
O rn
m 9
a
� a
y
N
O
u in M
V E m
v �
� O O
Q 0 O O
O N N
� u a a
Page 8
Page 9
LAW DEPARTMENT
Tom Brubaker, City Attorney
Phone: 253-856-5770 / Fax: 253-856-6770
KET T xees�° Address: 220 Fourth Ave. S.
Kent, WA 98032-5895
TO: Kent City Council Parks and Human Services Committee
DATE: August 27, 2015
FROM: Tammy White, Assistant City Attorney
SUBJECT: Animal Control — Ordinance Amending Chapter 8.03 of the Kent City
Code - Recommend Adoption
MOTION: Move to recommend Council adopt the proposed ordinance that amends
Chapter 8.03 of the Kent City Code to enact dog leash and waste removal
provisions, to clarify enforcement may be by both police officers and animal control
officers, and to clarify that the City has contracted with King County Animal Control
for animal control, sheltering, and licensing services within the City of Kent.
i
SUMMARY: This item was addressed before the Committee at its July 24, 2015, meeting
wherein the Committee requested that the City Attorney's Office research the leash and
scoop provisions adopted by surrounding jurisdictions and report back with its findings.
Included within the agenda materials for the August 271h meeting is a chart that compares
Kent's proposed code provision with those provisions in effect in the cities of Auburn,
Bellevue, Everett, Renton, Federal Way, Kirkland, Vancouver, Puyallup, Issaquah, Redmond,
and Des Moines. Having reviewed the comparisons, the Parks Director recommends the
proposed ordinance be revised to provide that it is unlawful for any person to fail to
immediately remove any fecal matter deposited by an animal in its possession on public
property or on any private property not belonging to the animal's owner, custodian, or other
person having possession of the animal. Under this proposal, the "unlawfulness" focuses on
the failure to remove the fecal matter, not its initial deposit. The prior proposal treated public
and private property differently and prohibited outright any fecal deposit on private property
without the property owner's advance permission, even if that fecal matter was immediately
removed. The ordinance includes the proposal recommended by the Parks Director (Sec.
8.03.050), which has been highlighted for ease of reference.
Consistent with City's current interlocal agreement with King County, the city of Kent
repealed many of its provisions within Chapter 8.03 of the Kent City Code and adopted a
number of provisions of Title 11 of the King County Code related to animal licensing, fees,
penalties, enforcement, and sheltering. Under the King County Code, a leash requirement is
enforced as a public nuisance. Because there is no corresponding City code provision, a
police officer cannot take enforcement action or issue a ticket to dog's owner if a dog is off
leash and running at large. An officer may only refer the complaint to animal control. This
ordinance also creates a local code provision that explicitly requires dogs to be on a leash
when not within an authorized off-leash area or contained and controlled on private property.
Adoption of this ordinance would allow enforcement either locally through the issuance of a
ticket by Kent police officers or King County's animal control officers, or through King
County's public nuisance code enforcement process.
Finally, the ordinance more clearly defines the relationship between the City of Kent and King
County in the provision of animal control, sheltering, and licensing services,
EXHIBIT: Ordinance, Agency Comparison Chart
BUDGET IMPACT: N/A
Page 10
Page 11
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE of the City
y Council of the
city of Kent, Washington, amending Chapter 8.03
of the Kent City Code, entitled "Animal Control," to
enact dog leash and waste removal provisions, to
clarify the City's animal control provisions may be
enforced by police officers or King County animal
control officers, and to clarify that the city of Kent
has contracted with King County for animal control,
sheltering, and licensing services within the city of
Kent.
RECITALS
A. Since July 1, 2010, the city of Kent and King County have
been parties to an interlocal agreement through which King County
provides regional animal control, sheltering, and licensing services for the
city of Kent and other King County agencies. The current interlocal
agreement is effective through December 31, 2017.
B. The interlocal agreement requires that the city of Kent adopt
an ordinance that includes animal license, fee, penalty, enforcement,
sheltering, and impound and redemption provisions substantially the same
as those provided for in Title 11 of the King County Code. Consistent with
the interlocal agreement, the city of Kent adopted Ordinance No. 3979 on
October 19, 2010, which repealed many provisions within Chapter 8.03 of
1 Amend Chapter 8.03 KCC—
Animal Control
Page 12
the Kent City Code and adopted a number of provisions of Title 11 of the
King County Code.
C. Section 11,04,230 of the King County Code provides that a
public nuisance includes "a dog running at large within the county."
"Running at large" is then defined by the King County Code as a dog that
is located off the owner's premises and not under control of the owner
either by leash, verbal voice, or signal control. Under the existing version
of the Kent City Code, the only enforcement of a "leash law" within the city
of Kent is through a public nuisance action enforced by King County.
There is no current means provided for a police officer to issue a civil
infraction (a ticket) to a dog's owner if that dog is off leash and running at
large in any place other than an authorized dog park or the owner's
property. This ordinance creates a local code provision that explicitly
requires dogs to be on a leash when not within an authorized off-leash
area or contained and controlled on private property. Enforcement of this
i
ordinance may be made locally by Kent police officers or by King County's
animal control officers, both of whom may file infractions in Kent Municipal
Court. In addition, King County may enforce a violation, other than of the
waste removal provision, through its public nuisance code provisions.
D. This ordinance also establishes an express requirement that
any person who has custody or control of an animal must immediately
remove any fecal matter deposited by that animal on public property or on
private property not belonging to the animal's owner or other person
having possession of the animal. Failure to comply with the ordinance is a
violation that may be enforced through the issuance of a civil infraction
filed with the Kent Municipal Court.
E. Finally, the ordinance more clearly defines the relationship
between the city of Kent and King County in the provision of animal
control, sheltering, and licensing services.
2 Amend Chapter 8.03 KCC—
Animal Control
Page 13
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT,
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE
SECTION 1. - Amendment. Chapter 8.03 of the Kent City Code,
entitled "Animal Control," is amended as follows:
Chapter 8.03
ANIMAL CONTROL
Sec 8.03.010. Animal control authority. The city of Kent has
contracted with King County and its Animal Control Section,_ Division of
General Services to provide animal control sheltering and licensing
services for the city of Kent That contract does not divest the city of its
authority to independently enforce its code. As such the provisions of this
chapter may be enforced by law enforcement officers or by King County
animal control officers both of whom are hereby authorized to issue and
file notices of infraction with the Kent Municipal Court as provided for in
KCC 8 03 080 Additionally, for those violations of the King County Code
that are adopted by reference for application and enforcement within the
city of Kent King County animal control officers may enforce those
provisions in accordance with the King County Code A copy of the
Interlocal Agreement between the city of Kent and King County for animal
control services is available for public examination in the City Clerk's
Office.
Sec. 8.03.020005. King County Code—eChapters adopted by
reference.
A. Chapters adopted. The following chapters of the King County Code,
as currently enacted or hereafter amended or recodified r w-are
adopted by reference for enforcement and application within the City of
3 Amend Chapter 8.03 KCC—
Animal Control
Page 14
Kent and shall be given the same force and effect as if set forth herein in
full,— m"rr�have b22r1 ul�l�.ildid vy .
, and as they may be ameRdedI Icl cul ll.l .
Unless the cent
indieates otherwise, 'King /I \\
1. King County Code, Chapter 11.04, entitled "Animal Care and
Control Regulations," with the following exceptions:
aG�. All references made in King County Code Chapter 11.04
to Title 21A of the King County Code, which utilize establishes King
Co Title „ ^'s iim `' o,.,. ''h"the number
of animals that may be kept in a dwelling units without the application of
certain licensing requirements as—thsslfield fer ` ' ng
requirengents shall be replaced with a reference to Kent City Code section
KGG 15.08.070.
2& King County Code Section 11.04,010_fB_} shall be read
to provide that if there is a conflict between a provision of this eChapter
11.04 of the King County Code and a provision of the Kent City Code, the
provision of the Kent City Code shall control.
C. with the eptien of King County Code Section
11.04.240 regarding police department dogs, whieh is not adopted
because the City of Kent has adopted a similar provision at KCC
9.02.280.in the Kent I/Q except
d6. King County Code Section 11.04.510 shall be read to
provide that no person within the e0ty of Kent shall publish or advertise to
King County residents the availability of any unaltered cat or dog unless
the publication or advertisement includes the unaltered animal's license
number; provided, however, that nothing in this chapter shall prohibit
licensed breeders from advertising in national publications for sale of a
planned litter or litters,
2. King County Code Chapter 11.12, entitled "Rabies Control";
4 Amend Chapter 8,03 KCC—
Animal Control
Page 15
3. King County Code _Chapter 11.20, entitled "Disposition of
Fowl and Rabbits';
4. King County Code Chapter 11.24, entitled "Stock Restricted
Area";
5. King County Code, Chapter 11.28, entitled "Exotic Animals";
6. King County Code, Chapter 11.32, entitled "Guard Dogs."
B. Agency references Unless the context requires otherwise,
references to "King County," "county," and "unincorporated King County,"
in the King County provisions adopted by reference through KCC
8 03 020 A shall be interpreted to mean the City of Kent.
C€. King County Code—Available for inspection. In the City Clerk's
Office,_tT-he city shall maintain at all `'Res available for review by the
general public in the one copy of the King County eCode
provisions ems adopted by reference in this chapter. The King County
Code is also available online through King County's website at:
www.kingcounty.gov.
Sec. 8.03.030. Definitions. The following words terms and
phrases as used in this chapter shall have the meanings ascribed to them
in this section unless a different meaning is plainly required For those
King County Code provisions adopted through KCC 8 03 020 A the words
terms and phrases used in those King CountyCode provisions shall have
the meanings ascribed to them by the King County Code.
A. "Domesticated fowl" means any duck, goose, swan, chicken, or
other fowl of similar size and character.
B. "Large domesticated animal" means any horse, mule, ass, bovine
animal, Iamb, goat, sheep, or other animal of similar size and character;
provided, it shall not mean pigs or swine of any kind.
5 Amend Chapter 8,03 KCC—
Animal Control
i
Page 16
C. "Owner" means any person having an interest in or right of
possession to an animal "Owner" also means any person having control
custody, or possession of any animal or by reason of the animal being
seen residing consistently at a location to an extent such that the person
could be presumed to be the owner.
D. "Person" means any individual firm business association,
partnership,_ corporation or other legal entity, public or private however
organized Because "person" shall include both human and non-human
entities any of the following pronouns may be used to describe a person:
he she or it
I
E. "Person responsible for the violation" means any of the following: a
person who has titled ownership or legal control of the property or
structure that is subject to the regulation; an occupant or other person in
control of the property or structure that is subject to the regulation; a
developer, builder, business operator, or owner who is developing,
building or operating a business on the property or in a structure that is
subject to the regulation; or any person who created caused, or has
i
allowed the violation to occur.
i
F. "Small domesticated animal" means any dog, cat, rabbit, or other
animal of similar size and character. Included within this definition is a
type of swine commonly known as Vietnamese, Chinese, or Asian potbelly
pigs (Sus scrota bittatus),
G. "Under control' means a dog who is either under competent voice
control or competent signal control or both so as to be restrained from
approaching any bystander or other animal and from causing or being the
cause of physical property damage when off a leash or off the premises of
the owner. Evidence that a bystander or other animal was approached by
6 Amend Chapter 8.03 KCC—
Animal Control
i
Page 17
the dog, or evidence that the dog caused physical property damage is
prima facie evidence that the dog was not "under control."
Sec. 8.03.040, Dogs—Leash required.
A Leash required It is unlawful for the owner of any dog to cause,
permit or allow such dog to roam run stray, or to be away from the
premises of such owner and to be on any public place or on any public
property, or on the private property of another, unless such dog, while
away from the premises of the owner, is controlled by a leash, cord, or
chain held or otherwise secured by owner and of a length sufficient to
restrain the dog from approaching any bystander or other animal or from
causing or being the cause of physical property damage when off the
premises of the owner. A leash of eight (8) feet in length or smaller is
presumed to be a leash of sufficient length for purposes of this section. A
violation of this section may be enforced as provided for in KCC 8.03.080.
B Exceptions A leash is not required if the dog is:
1 Within an area of a park expressly designated as an off-leash
area; or
2 Upon the premises of another with that owner or occupant's
permission and the dog is secured or otherwise under control in a manner
that prevents it from roaming running, or straying away from the
premises; or
3 Under control and engaged in lawful obedience training, lawful
hunting, lawful competition sanctioned by a nationally recognized body or
a local chapter thereof, or lawful training in preparation for such hunting or
competition; or
4 Contained within a vehicle under circumstances that do not
amount to a violation of another law; or
S A working dog engaged in the herding of livestock or in
sanctioned search and rescue activities; or
7 Amend Chapter 8.03 KCC—
Animal Control
Page 18
6 A law enforcement canine in the performance of the canine's
duty or training.
C. A violation of this section may be enforced as provided for in KCC
8 03 080 Alternatively, a dog running at large within the city of Kent is a
public nuisance under the King Count Code provisions adopted through
KCC 8 03 020 A and may be enforced by King County animal control
through the code enforcement Irovisions provided for in the King County
Code.
D. Impound and redemption Any dog found roaming running,
straying or being away from such premises and not on a leash as herein
provided may be impounded subject to redemption in the manner
provided for by King County animal control.
Sec 8 03 050 Animal waste—Removal reouired. It is
unlawful for any person to fail to immediately remove fecal matter
deposited by a dog or other animal in his or her possession on any public
property, including without limitation a park sidewalk, trail, street,
parking lot waterway, lake pond or landscaping or on any private
property that does not belong to the animal's owner, custodian, or other
Jerson having possession of the animal A violation of this section may be
enforced as provided for in KCC 8.03.080,
Sec. 8.03.06009A. Compliance with local zoninge and health
regulations.
A. Zoning compliance. The applicant for an original animal shelter,
kennel, grooming parlor, cattery, hobby kennel, or pet shop license shall,
prior to issuance of such license, present to the animal control authority
any required zoning permit from the city planning department.
8 Amend Chapter 8.03 KCC—
Animal Control
Page 19
B. Health inspection. Before an animal shelter, kennel, grooming
parlor, cattery, hobby kennel, or pet shop license may be issued by the
animal control authority, a certificate of inspection from the Seattle-King
County health department or.King County animal control division must be
issued showing that the animal shelter, kennel, grooming parlor, cattery,
hobby kennel, or pet shop is in compliance with hygienic standards of this
chapter or other applicable ordinances or regulations.
Sec. 8.03.07024-®. Animal nuisances defined. Each of the
following conditions unless otherwise permitted by law, is declared to
constitute a public nuisance subjecting the person responsible for the
violation to the penalties provided for in KCC 8.03 080:
seetien, vie4LTTLL
ions of this section are nuisanees and shall inelude but-net-be
limited te the felleyiing�
i. Repealed by Ord, Pie. 3979.
12. Maintaining large domesticated animals on lots of less than twenty
thousand (20,000) square feet or in violation of KCC 15.08.070.
23. Maintaining more than three (3) small domesticated animals per
business establishment or dwelling unit on lots of less than twenty
thousand (20,000) square feet, or maintaining any small domesticated
animal in violation of KCC 15.08.070; provided, this section shall not apply
to a properly licensed business operating as a pet shop, veterinary clinic,
or animal shelter to the extent that the animals maintained at the business
are maintained for the purposes of conducting the business and not for the
personal benefit of the owner, operator, or any employee or volunteer of
such business.
34. Maintaining more than three (3) domesticated fowl on lots of less
than five thousand (5,000) square feet, or maintaining any domesticated
fowl in violation of KCC 15.08.070; provided, this section shall not apply to
9 Amend Chapter 8.03 KCC—
Animal Control
Page 20
a properly licensed veterinary clinic to the extent that maintaining the
domesticated fowl is necessary for the veterinary treatment of the
domesticated fowl.
Sec 8 03 080 Violations and Enforcement—Penalties. Anv
violation of this chapter may be enforced as provided for in this section In
the alternative, any violation of a King County Code provision adopted in
this chapter for application and enforcement within the City of Kent, may
be enforced by King County Animal Control as provided for within the King
Count' Code Each separate date or portion thereof, during which any
violation occurs shall constitute a separate violation.
I
A Civil infraction A person who violates any provision of this chapter
may be issued a class 3 civil infraction as set forth in RCW 7 80.120, as
I
currently enacted or hereafter amended An infraction issued pursuant to
this section shall be filed in the Kent Municipal Court and processed in the
same manner as other infractions filed in the Kent Municipal Court.
B. Criminal offense Except as otherwise specifically provided for in
this section, a person who knowingly commits a repeated violation of this
chapter is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by up to the maximum
penalty established in RCW 9A 20 02(3) as now enacted or hereafter
amended For purposes of this section "repeated violation" means, as
evidenced by a prior committed finding by the Kent Municipal Court of an
infraction issued under this chapter, or a committed finding by King
County's hearing examiner of a public nuisance under Title 11 of the King
County Code that the person charged has twice before violated the same
provision of this chapter within the city of Kent Therefore on the third
time a violation occurs the person may be criminally charged for a
`repeated violation."
10 Amend Chapter 8.03 KCC—
Animal Control
Page 21
SECTION 2. - Severability. If any one or more section, subsection,
or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, that
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this
ordinance and the same shall maintain its full force and effect.
SECTION 3, - Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser, Upon
approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are
authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the
correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section or subsection numbering;
or references to other local, state or federal laws, codes, rules, or
regulations.
SECTION 4. - Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and
be in force thirty (30) days from and after its passage as provided by law.
SUZETTE COOKE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
RONALD F. MOORE, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY
11 Amend Chapter 8.03 KCC—
Animal Control
Page 22
PASSED; day of 2015,
APPROVED: day of 2015.
PUBLISHED: day of 2015.
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No.
passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved
by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated.
(SEAL)
RONALD F, MOORE, CITY CLERK
>:nnnw o.,na,oe omwi c�ai.ma
12 Amend Chapter 8.03 KCC—
Animal Control
Page 23
v �
v
U o v a m m
C O Lf1I aJ E
9 d N.. c m " m v E v E v
CO Q M `� m 0 t�f� Q a 0 o
"� II oy C o '^ E � E i
o _ � u c E o E o
O C pLj fPr Ln o. C 0 VI ^ O c
> a o 11 m n E co
a aJ _ N} E cc 'UE
OO L � [ oc
O
No al O
U QU
a O W N U m a `m II II .c II M
a) O (v C y} O N C C v C N N N
INS E � oo vcUN voi � nO.-. moo x w
0 0 O O O 0 0 a') '_' y. E m Y aJ '�'� Cr) i O O c o O
L N-0 01
Jm0 W• M• Jymo +�• • • • o F smv .L N T K o m a C E
N M CI T LL w UQ9 a) N EfrM• w
o
q m • •
ZO• opppU
�a m m
V U CO F I 0) t v 0
O N a
oa o. o o .� I m o o o .0 0 9 a)
,� a '° _ > 0_ ° '_' o a
E E c a T > o o — a o
° E ° E aoC co
> m E of � mc �CL c
CL U O O U ' 01mU a) o _
m
U T > T T Svc R m m w
'C C v L n. C — c m N r c o C o o v
a) a1 om 3 W O N O aJ N a m c y a y ;4 O Ali
E
E r'�o E ro
L > ® O V �. T d T ❑ O C W ? a a m h
m � va ZED K a�i0C zE � m ° � E z
5.
E
o m `o M0v nIE
o o w ° 9u m .� uu, um
iCE - `o m
L O L
N V G C
O i 0- V N
Q Ol m m °
W G N E i 3 Ru m v vi m N �p m 'p m L `O j
T N C L Ol O �➢ ++ C
C m O O d im e 0 vas O vov O ci p ° v
aj o au a
E ° E o3o E u E Co
``C J W
0 0 c o 3 c o ® > ° o n y v o a o o v
U1 m - N 's+ c m .. m Z ;�, v >. Z � m Z :r
K
'oc C VIU R N °' Vl
41 fl. C O M m v o�i N x a E N X w N H v
} m m wqb > wuY wu, R } wu� } w } wa
N
Co W
I
Page 24
F�
C L
'�
O O .• > C NL° E c E o
`-
o_
O p.0 o > +... 0 vi O-u m u US OL
>, .NN C C
} N 0 0 p 0) 0er' D_� TC E N u O O' c a V N u-
L u CD m ti p ? � ~ � T � L = Y 0
E V ,� tir p vt 0 p, L c o ..� u o
J 0000o0w E ° m E N E > n� ° 0
Q a dJ000j .�NGmI•-I� NNvC MMOII ON Ov uflT'
L v N
W YJ O
m N mCE NIIa myOc OCv
a7OV l U
cl>O
O 0
p nC C — @
° �`°o °
o 0 0 0 N � 0 0 3 o a wy " o o u N
O VV m > N O vOvN-
-
NEC , J O
6 e a 4 O W UTN
U
L
C o
tTi L N O L m
E L O U C C
@ a O T� C p N 0 0 v O
Eo _v, uam
CL N 0 `6 'p C 'E >-L f6 N T
o Y00 oQ3 yy=
E Q�
o o f m 0 3 E m T
y n V O E m u 0 a E
O C w O L Q v
O N A u a
0 I > wa 0o gip ° c ' v �
0
} 'a'= ZNNao ' � `L° aN dim ado O ® � �
° a Z Z J
m �
Nm e c C ❑ ,,,
� � ma c� vLv o u v E o '�..
C C C O O. 6, N 01 w ° .0 r. 1E C p
o, a L t o,= ,Y c E E
N � rao � a w apO a) E *' u 0 � E W a � m o.N
C u E E c C v o C O w o a)C 'C c C E O T
W w e
'p O '- f0 y U m N @ N L U UI O L O O
0 vv `vu N � o, 0 o, cm E
0 � c p o 0 U L 0 C) 0 N � E ° nau m ov
E 0 �° u E o E .. � ° E Y
o
c v ° y u w goy o 3 a e o L w c
O ® m O O .o u 0 G O v O v z O L c 0 01 O N j
m y > r z :G u O
v E " a E m u u u y y £ a u a
CJ C X X
w
1
® @ cr
U N 'C
Page 25
0
4
N
4
0 111 I
E N I
N �
,y y}
ml Q
O G
Z v }+Pr
m II II w
0 C C 0
N
q O p Vq}
p
O
W V
J • e • U1 I
Y
L
a
u '
m
E
O
L
O >
® p
p� E
tl/ L
y
� E
v �
J �
� C I
C L
O a�
.. 61
m O
O�
N W
Z � U
W N O
Q
LLI m E a o
—A E N
G
v � 7? O
O
v
N O U p 0IV # rm
9
k
a
Page 26
Page 27
• PARKS RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
� T xcH,;�P Jeff Watling, Director
' I'll U� Phone: 253-856-5100
Fax: 253-856-6050
Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S.
Kent, WA. 98032-5895
TO: Kent City Council Parks and Human Services Committee
DATE: August 27, 2015
FROM: Ronda Billerbeck, Cultural Services Manager
SUBJECT: Kent Arts DIY Project Update
MOTION: None, informational
SUMMARY: Ronda Billerbeck, Cultural Services Manager, will update the
committee on recent developments with the Kent Arts DIY (Do It Yourself) Project
that is part of the Community Project Artwork, approved in the City Art Plan.
Kent Arts DIY is a prototype project that will allow the people who live, work and
play in Kent to share their creativity with one another by uploading projects to an
automated website.
EXHIBITS: N/A
BUDGET IMPACT: N/A
I
Page 28
Page 29
® PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
'_�N ' rtei�'" Jeff Watling, Director
Phone: 253-856-5100
Fax: 253-856-6050
Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S.
Kent, WA. 98032-5895
TO: Kent City Council Parks and Human Services Committee
DATE: August 27, 2015
FROM: Jeff Watling, Parks, Recreation and Community Services Director
SUBJECT: Riverbend Golf Complex - Water/Well Update
MOTION: None, informational
SUMMARY: Jeff Watling, Kent Parks and Recreation and Community Services
Director and Pete Petersen, Superintendent of Riverbend Golf Complex will update
the committee on the water situation and the recent work performed on the well at
Riverbend.
EXHIBITS: N/A
BUDGET IMPACT: N/A
Page 30
Page 31
PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
° Jeff Watling, Director
K�NT rex1�P Phone: 253-856-5100
Fax: 253-856-6050
Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S.
Kent, WA. 98032-5895
TO: Kent City Council Parks and Human Services Committee
DATE: August 27, 2015
FROM: Jeff Watling, Director of Parks, Recreation & Community Services
SUBJECT: Director's Report
MOTION: None, informational
SUMMARY: Jeff Watling, Director of Parks, Recreation and Community Services,
will inform the committee of noteworthy information and upcoming events.
EXHIBITS: N/A
BUDGET IMPACT: N/A