HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Committees - Public Works/Planning - 12/01/2003 Public Works Committee Agenda
® Councilmembers: Julie Petersoni-Oco YinglingnTim Clark, Chair
KENT December 1, 2003
5:00 P.M.
Item Description Action Speaker Time Page
1. Approval of minutes dated November 3,2003 yes none 05 1
2. Vehicle and Equipment Surplus -Authorize yes Wickstrom 05 3
3. Utility Service Outside City Limits Ordinance yes Wickstrom 10 5
Authorize
Unless otherwise noted,the Public Works Committee meets at 5:00 p.m. on the I"and P Mondays of each month.
Council Chambers East,Kent City Hall,220 4th Avenue South,Kent,98032-5895.
For information please contact Public Works at(253) 856-5 500.
Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City Clerk's Office at
(253)856-5725 in advance.
For TDD relay service call the Washington Telecommunications Relay Service at 1-800-833-6388.
P:APublicAAdminislmiive SupportVanet\PobGc Works Committee MeetmpTW Ape da031201.duc
1
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MINUTES
November 3, 2003
COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Tim Clark,Rico Yingling, Julie
Peterson
The meeting was called to order by Committee Chair Tim Clark at 5:08 P,M. Tim Clark
suggested item 5 be moved to the top of the agenda to accommodate Ron Spear and Mike
Hannis from Soos Creek Water and Sewer District who were attending the meeting.
Approval of Minutes of September 15, 2003
Committee Member Rico Yingling moved to approve the minutes of September 15, 2003.
The motion was seconded by Conunittee member Julie Peterson and passed 3-0.
Interlocal Agreement with Soos Creels Water and Sewer District
Public Works Director Don Wickstrom said this agreement will set the terms and
conditions for the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District to use City Right of Way for
services. Don showed a map of the area included in the agreement.
Rico Yingling moved to recommend the Council authorize the Mayor to sign an
Interlocal Agreement with Soos Creek Water and Sewer District for provision of
water and sewer service by district within the City subject to the Public Works
Director's and City Attorney's concurrence of the language therein. The motion
was seconded by Julie Peterson and passed 3-0.
Sale of Properties at SE Ouadrant of SE 274`h St and 1081h Ave SE
Don Wickstrom said this is in conjunction with the 277` Corridor project, the lot with the
house on it was separated out and then the balance short platted into four lots. The
properties will be sold at the appraised values
Councilmember Rico Yingling asked how the City acquired the property, Don
Wickstrom responded the property was a acquired by a voluntary sale.
Julie Peterson moved to recommend authorization to full Council the sale of
properties at the southeast quadrant of SE 274th Street and 108�h Ave SE. The
motion was seconded by Rico Yingling and passed 3-0.
WSDOT Participation Agreement for Pac Hwy North Phase
Don Wickstrom said this agreement is a standard agreement with WSDOT saying they
will pay$77,000 for the design of the North Phase Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes
Asphalt Concrete Overlay.
Rico Yingling moved to recommend authorizing the Mayor to sign the WSDOT
Participation Agreement in the amount of$77,000 for the design of the North Phase
Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes Asphalt Concrete Overlay upon concurrence of
2
2
the language herein by the Public Works Director and the City Attorney and to
establish a budget for the same along with directing staff to spend the money
accordingly. The motion was seconded by Julie Peterson and passed 3-0.
Boeing Mill Creek Improvements Project
Don Wickstrom said when a project final contract amount exceeds 10% of the original
bid Public Works has historically sought the Public Works Committees concurrence
before bringing it to full Council. This project is 15.28% over the awarded contract
amount of$291,663.15. There was an error in calculation that resulted in the
Engineering project going over budget. Don commented that the Design staff is currently
using a Multi-Review process which Bill Wolinski's Environmental staff will now also
be using to catch errors.
Julie Peterson moved to recommend to full Council acceptance of the project as
complete. The motion was seconded by Rico Yingling and passed 3-0.
Council Member Rico Yingling asked how the Public Works handled the recent heavy
rainfall, Don commented that there were very few problems. There has been extensive
cleaning of the system and the ground was very dry helping keep things in control. Rico
commended the Public Works staff,particularly the Shops on a job well done.
The meeting adjourned at 5:27 P.M.
Janet Perschek
Administrative Assistant
i
i
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Don E. Wickstrom, P.E. Public Works Director
Phone:253-856-5500
�® Fax: 253-856.6500
KE`Y T Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S.
WASHINGTON
Kent,WA. 98032-5895
DATE: November 12, 2003
TO: Mayor White and Kent City Council
FROM: Dotk
strom, Public Works Director
THROUGH:
SUBJECT: Vehicle and Equipment Surplus
MOTION:
Recommend that the City Council authorize staff to appropriately dispose of the
equipment as described in this memorandum and listed below.
SUMMARY:
The listed vehicles/equipment comply with current replacement policy guidelines and have been
replaced. The equipment will be sold at auction or sold to smaller cities.
BUDGF,T IMPACT:
The monetary returns from the auction will be incorporated into the fleet internal services reserve
fund. This is a positive budget impact.
BACKGROUND:
Vehicle/Equipment List:
3106 1993 Ford Aerostar Cargo Van, s/n 1FTDA14U6PZB65381, 82,316 miles. This
vehicle was replaced and removed from service on 9/1/03. The vehicle has a work order history
of repeated electrical problems and customer dependability complaints.
3148 Kawasaki Police Motorcycle, s/n JKAKZCP26PB512106, 16,931 miles. This vehicle
was totaled in an accident on 9/3/03 and removed from service.
5383 1993 Chevrolet, Vactor, Sewer Cleaning Truck, shi 1GBT7H4J8PJ104724, 127,688
miles. This truck was replaced in 2002 but has remained in active service in the storm utility
section of Public Works Operations Division. Costs and maintenance hours needed to keep this
vehicle in service are continuing to escalate. We will watch for opportunities to sell this vehicle
while some reasonable value remains.
5391 1987 Kamatsu, FG20T Forklift, s/n 4087-6872F, 2,275 hours. This vehicle was
replaced and removed from active service in 2002. It has been borrowed and used for various
purposes throughout the city over the past several months but it is no longer dependable.
Mayor White and Kent City Council 1 Surplus Vehicle/Equipment
December 1,2003
i
I
i
I
8720 1995 Ford, S31 Superclub, s/n 1FBJS31H7SHB91154, 91,713 miles. After this vehicle
was replaced and removed from active service with the senior center it was reassigned to the
motor pool. The vehicle has again been removed from service due to an internal engine failure.
I
I
i
I
i
I
I
Mayor White and Kent City Council 2 Surplus Vehicle/Equipment
December 1,2003
LAW DEPARTMENT
Tom Brubaker, City Attorney
Phone: 253-856-5770
®U Fax: 253-856-6770
KE ■ -T Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S.
WASHINGTON
Kent,WA. 98032-5895
DATE: November 26. 2003
TO: Public Worklublic
mittee
FROM: Don Wickstr Works Director
SUBJECT: Utility Services Outside City Limits
MOTION: Recommend Council adopt the proposed ordinance that amends Ch. 7.11 of
the Kent City Code to clarify conditions for the provision of utility services to properties
located outside City limits.
SUMMARY:
RCW 35.67.310 allows the City to provide utility service to properties located outside City limits,
upon terms and conditions established by ordinance. Chapter 7.11 of the Kent City Code
contains the City's current code provisions regarding utility service provided outside the City.
However, these provisions were last amended more than thirteen (13) years ago—in November
1990.
The proposed ordinance amends Ch. 7.11 of the Kent City Code to separate and clarify what the
City will require in order to provide utility service to properties located outside the City limits, but
within the City's potential annexation area, and when providing utility service to properties
located outside the City limits and outside the City's potential annexation area.
BUDGET IMPACT:
None.
BACKGROUND:
The City has a long history dating back to 1972 (Resolution No. 718-A) of dictating under what
conditions the City would be willing to provide utility service (sewer and/or water) outside its
corporate limits. In the mid 1980's these conditions were subsequently incorporated into a City
Ordinance (Ordinance No. 2676 and 2696) which has since only been amended once in 1990.
Since that time a lot has changed. Cities such as SeaTac and Covington have incorporated.
The Growth Management Act was enacted and Kent now has agreements with its surrounding
jurisdictions regarding its designated Potential Annexation Areas (PAA). All this leads to the
fact as shown on the attached map that the City's utility system which once was only anticipated
to service unincorporated areas that potentially would be annexed now services areas that are
either in other jurisdictions or their PAA's. As such this proposed ordinance addresses this
change along with the recent changes to the State's annexation law. It should be noted while
providing utility service to areas in other jurisdictions or their respective PAA's we are still
1 �
proposing to retain authority over certain potential development aspects (drainage and traffic)
which would impact Kent.
The importance of this came to light with Polygon's proposed condo development within the City
of SeaTac just west of 42"d Ave and Northerly of S 216th St. which abuts Kent's city limits. Here
Kent gets both the storm drainage and traffic impacts associated with the development without
any reserve base to address same. However, when Council approved providing sewer service
to this area it was understood that these impacts would be addressed and this ordinance
assures that the City is on solid ground to do so.
P..iCM1MOl1N56WEEXEEt51115fily5ervv''e0u19GeCIlµAloYonSlraattlm
I
7
1
ORDINANCE NO.
i
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City
of Kent, Washington, amending Ch. 7.11 of the Kent City
Code, entitled "Utility service outside the city," to clarify
conditions for the provision of utility services to properties
located outside the City limits.
WHEREAS, RCW 35.67.310 allows the City to provide utility service
to properties located outside the City limits upon terms and conditions established by
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, Ch. 7.11 of the Kent City Code contains the City's current
code provisions regarding utility service outside the City, which was last amended in
November 1990; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance amends Ch. 7.11 of the Kent City Code to
separate and clarify what the City will require in order to provide utility services to
properties located outside the City limits, but within the City's potential annexation
area, and when providing utility services to properties located outside the City limits
and outside the City's potential annexation area;NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
1 Ch. 7.1I KCC Utility Service
Outside the City of Kent
{
8
SECTION 1. - Amendment. Chapter 7.11 of the Dent City Code,
entitled"Utility service outside the city,"is amended as follows:
Chapter 7.11. UTILITY SERVICE OUTSIDE THE CITY
Sec. 7.11.010. Within potential annexation area.nr ei�siKnated, The City
may will--not-provide utility services to properties located outside City limits, but
within the City's potential annexation area,ewside the corpc`a`+,�, -city--witk
the 8*eep=ios of those withinty's primary sphere of uucres«on
}�rtrpdses as su �seltniOn;unless if the property owner requesting such service
covenants and agrees as follows:
1. The owner will enter into a "no-protest to annexation" agreement,
which the City will record with the King County Recorder's Office, in which the
owner will give notice of the owner's intent to annex and will petition for annexation
of the property to the City any statutory
annexation method now enacted, or subsequently enacted, that involves a petition
process in order to effect the annexation. The notice and petition will constitute a
covenant that runs with the owner's property and will apply at the time the owner's
their property is included within any area that which-the City is considering is-berg
cons defe&for annexation. The notice and petition agreement will state that, upon
annexation, the property will be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same
basis as property within the City is assessed and taxed, and will include any
outstanding indebtedness of the City contracted prior to or existing at the time of
annexation. Further, this notice and petition will only be accepted -by-tks-city--under
terms and conditions established by the City through the public works department and
consistent with the provisions of this chapter.
II
a . „ ,.
�— .. ,.
—Th.-
....�a.�-aad-ag
wil-tht-aastssed a taoted at the .,.,..,
2 Ch. 7.1I KCC- Utility Service
Outside the City of Kent
9
•ty is assessed and t o y ou<< �a es �f +"��Y
BE3ntE&EtEEI-pri.�i"' " '" "`-mg-m"+�iv Hi396-(i�atif9tk.
23. The owners will agree to design and construct all public improvements
to meet or exceed City subdivision and construction standards. The City's public
works director, or his or her designee, department-reserves itsthe right to withhold
providing sanitary sewer,acid or water service until the public improvements have been
constructed in accordance with such standards.
34. The owners will agree to provide the City with mylar-reproducible or
other acceptable as-built construction drawings of the public improvements prior to
initiating building construction on any lot within any t4 e-proposed subdivision of the
property. The City shall have the right to inspect all construction work during and
after completion. Any work found not to have been constructed in accordance with
City construction standards, as determined by the public works director or his or her
i
designee, shall be corrected by owner at the owner's sole cost and expense.
i
4-. `lhe� o
meant impacts-on-the-City i n eluding immodiate-itripact. + h ,: .,., oadS3
and traffic system. The owners will agree and covenant hat^ �Ito participate in
i
the cost of constructing required improvements determined to be necessary by the City,
including impacts to the City's streets, roads, and traffic system and to the City's
creeks, streams, and drainage system, and payment of a proportionate share of all costs
associated with the construction of the road and traffic system improvements as
determined by the City. These improvements aetioms-rmrst be completed to the City's �
satisfaction prior to the City providing utility service to
H. The , r A n ,grec--to—pa re of--afl psis
,,..,,,.
associated-with ' f the r.,. : ..ad-tra€` ppr�as I
detexiiined by tie-city. The .,' _r . .?_:_::. ing-ilie ovine T so;;+r'ibuu&n-4ewi rd
3 Ch. ZII KCC- Utility Service
Outside the City of'Kent
10
:ti-he eery sc w1E`thn F 1, . ,,.,,,.,�-. ..hall-be-hft d upon .. F,.-..,. l ,7.terrnined-by
me
57. The requirements of this section will act as Ceovenants and promises
,.OBIAi4 na in-eementsthat will shall-run with the land and shall-be binding upon
all parties and successors in interest having or acquiring any right, title, or interest in
the property and the improvements described in any agreement.
ii
69. The owners will agree that, should it fail to comply with any of the
covenants ore€ any agreements executed with the City, the City may, at its sole
discretion,terminate the eity'--s-utility services provided to the owner.
79. The ov rannexation areas subject to these agreements
shall be consistent with applicable-subarea land use plan-, an the City's enywide
comprehensive plan,provided7ho ,rev nc: ` :h : wgree-that unto such
time as the 1990 1993 ,,,...prehe.. i -, plan-update ;. ,.,., . let. 0asisteney and with
the C-ityCity's long-range planning goals, as Shall--be determined by the planning
manager.;ife d !Mt tThe City may withhold full implementation of the
comprehensive land use plan map designations in its annexation zoning proposals in
order to achieve a more orderly physical development pattern and to implement its
goals of twenty(20)percent density reduction in multifamily residential areas.
81-0. The owners will state in its their-application for utility service or in its
notice and petition for annexation the existing King County zoning designation in
order to and-certify that it is consistent with the City's -plan-as-dewrrrtined by t�e
i
planning director until .ueb t;...,, ,,. a. I#W-l-993-comprehensive plan i7
etnithlete.
Section 7.11.020. Outside Potential Annexation Area. In accordance with
RCW 35.67.310, as currently enacted or hereafter amended or recodified, the City may
provide utility services to properties located outside City limits and outside the City's
4 Ch. 7.11 KCC- Utility Service
Outside the City of Kent
11
potential annexation area, if the property owner requesting such service covenants and
agrees, in writing,to the following requirements:
1. The owner agrees that development of the property may create
significant impacts on the City, including impacts to the City's streets, roads, and
traffic system and to the City's creeks, streams, and drainage system. The owner will
agree and covenant that it will participate in the cost of constructing required
improvements determined to be necessary by the City. These actions roust be
completed to the City's satisfaction prior to the City providing utility service to the
subject property.
2. The owner agrees and covenants that it will mitigate its impact upon the
City's storm drainage system in those areas deemed appropriate by the City's public
works director, or his or her designee. Mitigation may be by implementing the off-site
mitigation improvements deemed necessary by the City, by paying to the City an
amount equivalent to the estimated cost of construction of the necessary improvements
in order to mitigate the impact upon the City's system due to development of owner's
property, or by other appropriate mitigation procedures. In those instances where
impacts to a major or regional project is involved, the owner shall pay a prorated share
as determined appropriate by the City. Construction of any mitigating improvements
shall meet or exceed City construction standards and shall be further made in
accordance with this subsection.
3. The owner shall agree to pay a proportionate share of all costs
associated with the construction of the road and traffic system improvements as
determined by the City. Further, where the subject property abuts and takes access off
of a City street, the owner agrees to improve the property's frontage to City standards
as outlined in the City's construction standards. The owner shall submit plans of the
frontage improvements to the City for review and approval along with providing mylar
reproducible or other acceptable as-built construction drawings upon completion. The
City shall have the right to inspect the construction work during and after completion.
5 Ch. 7.11 KCC- Utility Service
i
Outside the City of Kent
I
12
Any work found not to have been constructed in accordance with the City's
construction standards, as determined by the City's public works director or his or her
designee, shall be corrected by owner at owner's expense. These frontage
improvements must be completed or bonded to the satisfaction of the City prior to the
City providing utility service to the property.
4. The owner agrees that the covenants and promises contained in these
agreements shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all parties and successors
in interest having or acquiring any right, title, or interest in the property and
improvements described in any agreement.
i
5. The owner agrees that, should it fail to comply with any of the
covenants or any of the agreements executed with the City, the City may, at its sole
discretion,terminate the utility services provided to owner.
6. For those properties seeking City utility service that would affect an
upstream tributary of a drainage watershed area that is subject, all or in part, to City
regulation or control, and which is serviced, all or in part, by the City's storm and
surface water utility,the following additional requirements will also apply.
(a) The owner will design and construct all public and/or private
storm water detention and water quality treatment system(s) ("drainage system(s)") in
a manner that meets or exceeds City construction standards as determined by the public
works department. The City's public works director, or his or her designee, reserves
his or her right to withhold sanitary sewer and water service until the drainage
system(s)have been constructed in accordance with these standards.
(b) The owner will submit all construction plans for the drainage
system(s) associated with the development to the City for its review and approval prior
to initiating development work on the property. The owner will provide the City with
mylar-reproducible or other acceptable as-built construction drawings of the drainage
6 Ch. 7.71 KCC- Utility Service
Outside the City of Kent
I
i
13
system(s) after they have been constructed. The owner will grant the City the right to
enter the owner's property at any time in order to inspect any construction work during
design or construction, or after its completion. Any work found not to have been
constructed in accordance with City construction standards, as determined by the
public works director or his or her designee, shall be corrected by the owner at its sole
cost and expense.
i
(c) The owner will pay any permit review fees deemed appropriate
by the public works director. The owner must grant to the City a right of access to
inspect continuing operations and maintenance of the drainage system(s)to assure they
are being operated and maintained properly. If the drainage system(s) are not
maintained or operated properly, the owner agrees to promptly bring the utility
facilities into compliance with City standards.
(d) Where deemed appropriate by the public works director, or his
or her designee, owner's property may be subject to the same terms and conditions as
those properties located within City limits, including but not limited to service charges
in accordance with Ch. 7.05 of the Kent City Code, as currently enacted or as hereafter
amended or recodified from time to time.
SECTION 2. —Severability. If any one or more section, subsections, or
sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision
shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same
shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 3. — Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be
in force thirty(30) days from and after its passage as provided by law.
JIM WHITE, MAYOR
7 Ch. 7.11 KCC- Utility Service
Outside the City of Kent
14
II
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY
i
PASSED: day of December,2003.
APPROVED: day of December, 2003.
PUBLISHED: day of December, 2003.
1 hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed
by the City council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the mayor of the
City of Kent as hereon indicated.
(SEAL)
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
i
II
I
i
i
8 Ch. 7.11 KCC- Utility Service
Outside the City of Kent
m m g 3 .E
O Yam a�w
II �m`m L'ne
Y L
in c , y
o� � aa If,v�aa
iy T ����i
!'— Y 9s xne I
� -
w �I
55 apvoat j x rt� m —
7 ✓ �LLJ. '' 111 1 '`�1 a
COP—
J E�
C� as vnvazt�7 r�--�y a',. �1}- "/ F .i wq ae anaauv
-.'S 8AY9iL
asant T
11�I.{
36 HAy BOS L Qa 06RB0 ITT �'
as aIv os
V 1 v \Z<VJ I I 9'4
'�l�xooz4 �s rlI i �
n6
errI��IL
r
BN Aa SlFoed T- I.N .
_ L l m 69AY 89 F �.. FMH' IIeA LA
f � o
f
3oe sa
m EjL 0 1��
5