Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Council Committees - Public Works/Planning - 08/18/2003
Public Works Committee Agenda ® Councilmembers: Julie Peterson.Rico Yingling•Tim Clark, Chair KENT WASHING,WASHING70h August 18, 2003 Item Descnp ion Action S'ueaker Time Page 1. Approval of minutes dated August 4,2003 yes none 05 1 2. Rodenhauser Latecomer Agreement—Authorize yes Wickstrom 05 5 3. Sensitive Area Quitclaim Deed—From the Boeing Co.—Authorize yes Wickstrom 05 7 4. State Grant for Commute Trip Reduction Program- Authorize yes Wickstrom 05 49 5. Six-Year Transportation Improvement Plan—Adopt yes Wickstrom 10 65 I I I Unless otherwise noted,the Public Works Committee meets at 5:00 p.m. on the In and 3'Mondays of each month. �! Council Chambers East,Kent City Hall,220 4th Avenue South,Kent,98032-5995. For information please contact Public Works at(253) 856-5500. Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City Clerk's Office at (253)856-5725 in advance. For TDD relay service call the Washington Telecommunications Relay Service at 1-800-833-6388. S:\PIIBLIC\CLERR\City Council Committee PackcIsftbEc Works\030X18.doc 1 ' i I PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MINUTES August 4, 2003 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT- Chair Tun Clark,Rico Yingling, and Julie Peterson, The meeting was called to order by Tim Clark at 5.05 P M. Approval of Minutes of July 7,2003 Committee Member Rico Yingling moved to approve the minutes of July 7, 2003 The motion was seconded by Committee Member Julie Peterson and passed 3-0 Project Construction Agreement with Puget Sound Energy-Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes Proiect-Authorize Public Works Director Don Wickstrom said that as part of the Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes Project the overbead distribution power is being converted to underground in order to meet the requirements of City ordinance. The total cost to the city for this conversion project is approximately$850,000 Julie Peterson moved to recommend that the Council authorize the Mayor to sign the Project Construction agreement with Puget Sound Energy upon concurrence of the language therein by the City Attorney and the Public Works Director. The motion was seconded by Rico Yingling and passed 3-0. Joint Utility Trench Agreement Regarding Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes Project. -Authorize Don Wickstrom said as part of the Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes project the overhead utilities are required to be converted to underground in accordance with City ordinance This agreement is for the City to furnish a trench and install Conicast's facilities within the City's joint utility trench for both phases of the Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes project Com cast agrees to pay the City an estimated cost of $278,254 Rico Yingling moved to recommend authorizing the Mayor to sign the Joint Utility Trench Agreement with Comeast upon concurrence of the language therein by the City Attorney and the Public Works Director. The motion was seconded by Julie Peterson and passed 3-0. 2 Public Works Comiwttee,6/16/03 2 Bret Gagliardi Sewer Latecomers Agreement—Authorize Don Wrckstrom said that Bret Gagliardi has requested a sewer latecomer agreement for his extension of the sanitary sewer main to serve his properties along Russell Road,when latecomers connect Bret Gagliardi would be reimbursed fees from the 2 lots Julie Peterson moved to recommend authorizing the Public Works Director to execute a sewer Latecomer Agreement with Bret Gagliardi for the Bret Gagliardi Sewer. The motion was seconded by Rico Yingling and passed 3-0. Vehicle and Equipment Surplus-Authorize Don Wickstrom said the listed vehicles/equipment complywith current replacement policy guidelines and have been replaced The equipment will be sold at auction or sold to smaller cities Julie Peterson asked about the first vehicle on the list# 1003 and the circumstances as to why it was being removed since it has low miles Alice Conrad, Fleet Superintendent stated that the safety concerns were enough to pull the van from service even if the problems could not be reconstructed in testing Clark County is interested in purchasmg the van Rico Yingling moved to recommend authorization to declare the listed vehicles and equipment as surplus authorizing staff to appropriately dispose of the equipment as described in this memorandum and listed. The motion was seconded by Julie Peterson and passed 3-0. i South 228i"Street Extension—Public Works Trust Fund Loan.-Authorize Don Wickstrom said this loan was a plus for the City The loan is for$1 million and would be applied to the design and right of way purchases for the S 228th Street Extension Project Accepting this loan would offset$1,000,000 in bonds for the project. Julie Peterson moved to recommend authorizing the Mayor to execute the Public Works Trust Fund Pre-Construction Loan Agreement,Number PW-03-691-PRE- 108,in the amount of$1,000,000. The motion was seconded by Rico Yingling and passed 3-0. Rainwater Harvesting System—Amending Chapter 7.05 of the Kent City Code Don Wrckstrom said the Engrossed Substitute House Bill#2088 signed into law by Governor Locke will require a code amendment of Kent City Code relating to storm and surface water utility changes in order to include a definition of"rain water harvesting system"and a provision allowing for 10%rate reduction if such a system is in use by a commercial property owner or renter Julie Peterson moved to recommend council adoption of the proposed ordinance amending the Kent City Code to include a 10% discount on storm and surface water 3 Public Works Committee,6l16103 3 utility charges for commercial properties utilizing a rainwater harvesting system. The motion was seconded by Rico Yingling and passed 3-0. Proposed LID• 120`h PI SE Sanitary Sewers (SE 256"St to 200 feet South)—Adopt Resolution of Intent Don Wtckstrom said the City received a petition for the installation of sanitary sewers in the vicinity of SE 256`h Street and 120P Place SE, all property owners were contacted and there appears to be adequate support to proceed with the LID formation Julie Peterson moved to recommend adoption of the Resolution of Intent setting a public hearing date on the formation of the LID for the 6 properties shown on the attached map. The motion was seconded by Rico Yingling and passed 3-0. The meeting adjourned at 5 35 P M Janet Perschek Administrative Assistant 5 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Don E Wickstrom, P E Public Works Director Phone 253-856-5500 ® Fax 253-856-6500 K EN T Address 220 Fourth Avenue S WASHINGTON Kent,WA 96032-5895 DATE: 8/ 113 TO: M r Irate and Kent City Council FROM: ickstrom,Public Works Director THROUGH SUBJECT: Rodenhauser Latecomer Agreement MOTION: Recommend Council authorization for the Public Works Director to execute a Sewer Latecomer Agreement with Darrell Rodenhauser for the Rodenhauser Sewer Extension SUMMARY: Homeowner,Darrell Rodenhauser,has requested a sewer latecomer agreement for his extension of the city's sanitary sewer main Four lots benefit from the extension, including Mr Rodenhauser's home Two neighbors have negotiated directly with Mr Rodenhauser to pay their proportion of the cost, and he would like to record a latecomer agreement against the remaining parcel The total project cost is$37,430, and the cost per lot is calculated at$9,357 50 The Public Works Director requests authorization to enter into a latecomer agreement with this developer, I BUDGET IMPACT. No Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personnel Impact BACKGROUND: i 1 i i Mayor White and Kent City Council Rodenhauser Sewer Latecomer Agreement-Authorize August 4,2003 1 _ ill �1t'.�µ'IiRJ.�,TP,$D" �� I�aTY�AXA 29 {7QT.,4��R/�NTEEA I s '1lyd•SUS�L1f�MT$'r TO ESOSO_J1dCff8AY'E VR�SiSENT'8 !� 2-5 1. ApJ 013 l.42 c 0 -D 5 1-LHB'A9 zl•' -a7a j° lae, 3 lam oa 3a 'ao 1 3 00 lao,->s ao 3c + p i 0 s u 016 16 092� a17° 1 h OILO Coto las 3Z5 1 135 83 1 oleo 2 t 15 15 0210 also Dow Lf) a a 13�.31 N i4 3 a ° 14 3 3 o iz a9D0 a190 IN 01t0 a 001D Ia5 Z9 1 V � Y I 13 D�yO " oaaa 4 N_ {�� 13 3 " 40 v �� J DC' Ot ° � 00 � 135 27 x �O_ DO Ij ' 135 Z7 la1 '.. YY � i2 12 5 0240 Ova01A0 Da50 � I 13 S 2 S O x 13 5 a 5 N . 6 " 11 6 t N oiao o to 0040 133 2 �r 1 •• 1'3 5 23 0 0 0 �y A 8 60 OtfA ' 7 10 0ro° ' DDTO 7 d c aa90 u IbS 19 t33 00 '-+a bo 1"3S o0 ��}1� 330 19 N 6H• 5b' SS' ,��, N S.E. 274TH ST. rie 36 N ? gs •ts 9a vo 96ea sr do p, B7 72. L� rr R ^/ 11 !1 2r 2s N �L q 0 19 IJrO L I.,�' h� q 2� p P N N Otto 1 • O D�'r.° h n aor0 la�.d 0iq0 8Ap0 a0�621D leas n t, 1n M } 7 A y�i h: I O 2 3 A f A q RI 90 a I 3Or,,s.S�� I y. 000 >:, w 0020 r 0�ID p'90° qA/�°• r w .r ? roe :a = M wit 2,9 �' e�, ° G `i• PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Don E Wickstrom, P E Public Works Director Phone 253-866.6500 ''.... Fax 263-856-6500 Z0111111101KCFE-INT Address 2201 Fourth Avenue 5 WASHINGTON Kent WA 980325895 V DATE: August 9,2003 TO: M ite and Kent City Council FROM: Don ickstrom,Public Works Director THROUGH SUBSE CT- Acceptance of a Sensitive Area Quitclaim Deed for approximately 10.98 acres of a wetland mitigation site from the Boeing Company located at S. 196'h Street and 72nd Ave.S. MOTION: Recommend accepting from the Boeing Company by sensitive area quitclaim deed approximately 1D.98 acres of real property located at the Northeast intersection of S. 196E Street and 72"d Ave. S. SUMMARY: Accept from The Boeing Company Sensitive Area Quitclaim Deed totaling approximately 10 98 acres of wetlands adjacent to Mill Creek, a salmomd bearing stream Parcels ID Nos 331060- 0100-05, 331060-0375-03, 331060-0385-01 BUDGETiMPACT None The Boeing Company is responsible for maintenance and monitoring of the site for a ten- year period After that period,the site will remain in its natural condition and little if any fiscal impacts will result from the property The site has been heavily planted with trees and shrubs and will be a forested wetland at the end of the ten-year monitoring period BACKGROUND: As a part of the SEPA conditions of Pacific Gateway, The Boeing Company was required to dedicate in a separate tract or record a Sensitive Area Easement The site is the location of the wetland mitigation from wetland impacts on the Pacific Gateway site located at the northwest intersection of S 212'h Street and West Valley Highway The site contains healthy forested wetlands adjacent to Mill Creek and 3 49 acres of created wetland adjacent to Mill Creek, a salmonid bearing stream The mitigation plan was approved by the Unites States Army Corps of Engineers, the Department of Ecology and the City of Kent The Boeing Company is responsible for maintenance and monitoring of the site for a 10-year period This property is an excellent acquisition for the City of Kent due to the quality of the wetlands and habitat potential for sahnonids, amphibians and other terrestrial and aquatic species in the Mill Creek watershed Mayor White and Kent City Council The Boeing Company Wetland Mitigation Property August 4,2003 1 i s WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO Property Management City of Kent 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, Washington 98032 a Grantor: The Boeing Company Grantee: City of Kent Abbreviated Legal Description: Portions of the North ilx of the NW 1/4 of Section 1, T22N, R4E,W M Additional Legal Description on page 5 and 6 of Document. Assessor's Tax Parcel ID Nos. 331060-0100-05; 33 1060-037 5-03,and 331060-0385-01 Project Name:Boeing Pacific Gateway Parcel 4 Wetland Mitigation Site Document Date: July 22,2003 SENSITIVE AREA QUITCLAIM DEED (Corporate) THE BOEING COMPANY ("Grantor"), a Delaware corporation,for and in consideration of mutual benefits derived and/or other valuable consideration receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by Grantor,conveys and quit claims to CITY OF KENT,a Washington municipal corporation, ("Grantee") for municipal purposes relating to sensitive areas preservation and maintenance, the following described real property situated in King County, Std(e of Washm?ton,including any after acquired title(the "Property") SEE EXHIBIT "A"ATTACHED SENSITIVE AREA QUITCLAIM DEED-Pegg I of 6 fbetween The Boeing Cwnpany and City of Kent) 9 This deed does not relieve the Giantors' successors, heirs and assigns fiom any previous obligations within the described sensitive area,including without limitation the following 1 1 Grantor shall post a maintenance bond for the wetland on the property for ten (10) years after recording of this deed, and said bond shall be in accord with Exhibit "B"attached and incorporated by this reference. 12 Grantor shall maintain the Pmpeity in accordance with the requirements of the State of Washington, Department of Ecology attached as Exhibit "C" and incorporated by this reference and Grantor shall have, and hereby reserves to itself, the tight to enter the Property from time to time to inspect the Property, to ensure that it complies with said requirements, and to perform such maintenance, repairs, replacements,restorations, renewals, and other work as may be necessary in connection with such requirements Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Grantor hereby indicates, pursuant to the requirement in Exhibit "C"tilled "Deed Restriction" that the wetland mitigation areas of the Property are "waters of the state." 13 Grantor shall maintain the Property in accord with the requirements of the Army Corp of Engineers,attached as Exhibit"D" and incorporated by this reference and Grantor shall have, and hereby reserves to itself, the tight to enter the Property from time to time to inspect the Property, to ensure that it complies with said requirements, and to perform such maintenance, repairs,replacements,renewals, and other work as may be necessary in connection with such requirements The conveyance and quitclaim hereunder is further subject to the following 21 The Grantor hereby reserves to itself in its capacity as Corporate Trustee for the Western Processing Trust Fund II the right to enter the Property from time to time as necessary to comply with the requirements of the Consent Decree in Cause No C83-252M dated April 10, 1987, and without limiting the generality of the foregoing to inspect, maintain, repair, replace, restore, renew, and, as necessary decommission the extraction wells,monitoring wells, and piezometers referred to in Exhibit "E" and to obtain readings and/or samples from such extraction wells, monitoring wells, and piezometers Grantor agrees that in exercising any of the rights it reserved under this Quit Claim Deed should Grantor determine that it is necessary to decommission any extraction wells, monitoring wells, and piezometers, Grantor shall obtain prior written approval for such work from all applicable agencies, and Grantor shall repair any property damage caused by Grantor during the course of said work to the satisfaction of Grantee 2 2 The Grantor hereby reserves to itself in its capacity as Corporate Trustee for the Western Processing Trust Fund 1I the right to enter the Property froin time to time to inspect, maintain, repair, replace, restore, renew, and otherwise perform work SENSITIVE AREA QUITCLAIM DEED-Page 2 of 6 (between The Boeing Company and Cary of Kent) 10 on the following features described in Exhibit "E"° Detention Basin, Sluily Wall, Site Cap Storm Drain System; Access Roadways; Mill Creek Culvert and Slope Protection; Area IX Cover,and Fence I 23 The Grantee,for itself and its successors and assigns, agrees For the benefit of The Boeing Company in its capacity as Corporate Trustee for the Western Processing Trust Fund 11 that the Grantee will not take any action that would distuib, damage, or alter the Extraction Wells, Monitoring Wells, Piezometers, Detention Basin, Slurry Wall, Site Cap Storm Drain System, Access Roadways,Mill Creed Culvert and Slope Protection, Area IX Cover, and Fence described in Exhibit"E' The Grantee's acceptance of and agreement to the foregoing shall be evidenced by the recording of this Quitclaim Deed in the records of King County, Washington Such agreements shall be covenants that run with the land and shall bind the successors in title of the Grantee. 2.4 Pursuant to the requirements of XII C 3 of the Consent Decree in Cause No C83- 252M dated April 10, 1997, The Boeing Company, a Delaware corporation, hereby notifies the Grantee and any potential purchaser of the real property described in this Quitclaim Deed that the use of groundwater beneath the Property may be restricted and anyone seeking to use such groundwater must comply with The present and future restrictions placed on the use of groundwater by the City of Kent, the State of Washington Department of Ecology, and their successors 25 Grantor agrees that to exercising any of the rights it reserved under this Quit Claim Deed should Grantor's activity cause loss of or damage to dry property, Grantor shall repair any such loss or damage to the satisfaction of the Grantee GRANTOR- THE B EING COMPANY by ✓ifa its A onzed Signatory DATE. 07 (Notary PubhcAcdnowledgementAppems on Next Page) SENSITIVE AREA QUiTCLAIM DEED.Page 3 of 6 (between The Boeing Company mid City of Kent) 11 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss COUNTY OF KING ) On this N day of c _ , 2003, before me a Notary Public In and for the State of Washington, personally appealed 1 r,v!�, to me known to be the Authorized Signatory of TIIE 130FING COMPANY, a Delaware coiporahon, that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged it to be the free and voluntmy act of said corporation, for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument •Nman Seal MwApprar 19uhm Tlur Ara• Ii IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above wntten a+nt+rrurtrrr ` ` g��510N e i i� OL Apr 1 1 ems-- o NOTARY PUBLIC, in and for the State of Waslon ;y puett� ws resldmgat 1G My appointment expnes I APPROVED AS TO FORM Kent City Attorney r�e.rr��.rsor<wu..wm.mone.�.�Sea„u.na�,Quuc4uatx.au y.. SENSITIVE AREA QUITCLAIM DEED-Page 4 of 6 (Gehseen The Boemg Company and Cay of Kent) 13 EXHIBIT A I� II i i i 15 EXHIBIT"A,. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 114 OF SECTION 1,TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST W M , DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS' BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1, BEING THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION AND THE EAST MARGIN OF A 60 FOOT STRIP OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF KENT FOR 72NO AVENUE SOUTH BY DOCUMENT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO 8709180746, THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN 678 FEET, THENCE NORTH 89022'DY'EAST TO THE WEST MARGIN OF THE PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE NORTH 00047'00"WEST ALONG SAID WEST MARGIN, 678 FEET 70 THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1, THENCE SOUTH 89022'00"WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED FOR DRAINAGE DITCH NO 1 UNDER KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO 32912, (ALSO KNOWN AS LOTS 3,4 A14D A PORTION OF 5 TOGETHER WITH A 30 FOOT STRIP ADJACENT ON THE NORTH, LYING BETWEEN THE PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AND A 60 FOOT STRIP OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF KENT FOR 72N0 AVENUE SOUTH UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO 8709180746 OF HIGHWAY HOME GARDEN TRACTS,ACCORDING TO THE UNRECORDED PLAT THEREOF), SITUATE IN THE CITY OF KENT,COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON PARCELS THE WEST 160 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT THAT PART OF THE NORTH V2 OF THE NORTHWEST 114 OF SECTION 1,TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST W M, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS BEGINNING ATA POINT WHICH IS NORTH 89022'00"EAST 1,365 FEET AND SOUTH 678 FEET FROM NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE SOUTH 655 28 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF DWYER COCHRANE COUNTY ROAD NO 1124 (SOUTH 196TH STREET), THENCE ALONG SAID ROAD LINE NORTH 89032'00" EAST 363 10 FEET TO WESTERLY LINE OF SEATTLE-TACOMA INTERURBAN RAILWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY,NOW PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, SENSITIVE AREA QUITCLAIM DEED-Paoe 5 of G (henreen The Boeing Company and City of Kent) I 16 THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE NORTH 00°47'00"W EST 656 31 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 89022'00"WEST 35412 FEET TO BEGINNING, (BEING TRACT 23 OF UNRECORDED PLAT OF HIGHWAY HOME GARDEN TRACTS), SITUATE IN THE CITY OF KENT,COUNTY OF KING,STATE OF WASHINGTON PARCEL C. THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 112 OF THE NORTHWEST 114OF SECTION 1,TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST W M , DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS BEGINNING AT A POINT WHICH IS NORTH 89°22'00"EAST 1,365 FEET AND SOUTH 678 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION-DIVISION, THENCE SOUTH 655 28 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF DWYER COCHRANE COUNTY ROAD NO 1124 (SOUTH 19et STREET), THENCE ALONG SAID ROAD LINE NORTH 89432'00" EAST 36310 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SEATTLE-TACOMA INTERURBAN RAILWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY(NOW PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC RAILROAD PIGHT-OF-WAY), THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT•OF-WAY LINE NORTH 00047'OO"W EST 656 31 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 89°22'00"WEST 354 12 FEETTO POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT THE WEST 160 FEET THEREOF AS CONVEYED TO THE AUSTIN PARTNERSHIP,A WASHINGTON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, BY DEED RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO 8201150028. j (BEING TRACT 24 OF UNRECORDED PLAT OF HIGHWAY HOME GARDEN TRACTS,AND VACATED STREET ON THE EAST), SITUATE IN THE CITY OF KENT,COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON SENSI TIVE AREA QUITCLAIM DEED-Pave 6 of 6 {between The Boeing Company and City of Kent) '', 17 EXHIBIT B Ii I li 19 [Pl y YL'RFORIMANC1= BOND ~ Bond Net. 104053,,M8 I f;l\0,VV ALL BY TITSI; PKFSLN IS, lhnt wc. 1110 13uc1Ile Compvn. as PI IIIi ipal. and I Ian clers C IINLIally and Surety Compan} of Ameuca, as Sway. are 11Lld .Ind lirmly 11011nd Hertel City ofKvIlt, Xs Uhll(Iec. u1 the aunt of 1)fly l�nur Thousand t lac}-luudred f utty POLIr ,111d 00"100 Dollars 1S54,144,00i, fca paymunt NN hercufsatd l'tntcipal and j surety hued then tykes, their heirs. c,\ecutor,+, admintsuatcns, successors and wmg,113. 7oinfly and seticrally, dimly by these picsents i NV1II R I_'A S, the ahol,e-bound I'dwipal has completed the plant 311stallau01) 0110111ed m the ( '1tv of'Kent .ippiuwd Wetland N1(ivation Plan (Devised) Pacilic Cmfct+ay Busmm Park prep iredby ('had Aimour,LLC dated august, '003 (Welland hhtigauon Plan} tihelcas_ as a condition of the appluvcd Wetland Mitigation Plan, Pzincipatl has agreed to post a bond or other surety in the mnounl of 125 percent of the value of the c\pccied dust to tcplace the Installed plants should they fall to survive and the cost to mmnaor and j lntnntain the conslrucuon Luca &1111" the 10-ycar Inonilnnne period N0W, TI ICKFFORF. Tl lh C MIDI I 1()\ UP I HL• A13O 1. OHJ 16A I ION I5 SUCI1, iltat If the ahutu-named Principal, AS successors oz assigns, does and shall well and hul.- ubser,,e. perform, Adfill and keep its obllgauons cts sct loith in the above-mentu,u,cl appl cord NVOLII)d h1111gation Plan. for which a holed mint be posted. lhui life abate nhllgatlon shall be terminated, otlrer\Nisc the ublwation shall remain in full folLr,Ind el feet. l I11S BOND w111 run fora thrcc (3)-yc,Ir term cl)'Cdi ve h4arclt 0. 2003 i TIPS BOND IS SUBJECT, howcwz. Io file lollomm, condition-- FIRST. Th.,.tt in the cunt u(a default on the Imit of the Principal, its cueccti ul. Of assigns, a written statement of such default %vab full details tLrrcctil'shall he given it, Sul ety promptly. nod in .my cvcti(, wilhin six (6) months after the C)bhL'ce shall lcaril of Such deli+nit, such notice to be ddiw ed Imsonally or by regi-teled ntati to Sutct} at 215 �huntmt 13]\,d , Naperville. 11, 60563-9458. SECOND: That no claim, suit or action under this bond by reason of my Such dufuilt Shall he brought argamst Surcty unless asserted 0r commenced within h•,olvc (12) months Ater the ellective date of any tounination of cancellation ol'this bond, 1 i i zo A HUM I licit to older to satisfy the 11)-y c cu banchng tcquirernents in tltc apl,t�n�d Wetland Mitigation Plan this bond itrty be automatically renmed tut two ('_) addttiona II)fee (3)-year terms and 01IC ( I ) add ttiumtl 1-yetis' term, unlesti Ie rill ill ItCtl N c,rnevIIed i ')III-et y by thirty (i0) days` htiot notice in tktiting froth Surety to Principal and Obligee. such notice to be given by certified mail and acknowledged by said (.)i,ligrec. Suelt tetnlin;ttlbll or canccliation shall not ail'ect any liability incurred or acetued under tilts bond prior to the effective date ol'such termination or cancellation 1'hc liability ol'tlie '+tlrety Shell be Ittntted to the. alnottttt scat forth and is not cumulative ,Such tcrnlillation shall tlot affect Principal's c>bliEatic)n to ,rmis(y the lit-year bonding iequiaement { FOURTH. That no right of action shall accrue under this frond to of for ilic use ofailiv person other than the Obli"cc, I-1 W'ITNFSS WHERE01-. the above-botutd Piincipal and Swcty havcheteundet set their hands and Seats on the ^_Gday of I\•farch, 2003). The Boeing Con pany -4,AAJbMal e k, t' W-3+ar-t E- Treas�r e r 'I'mwicrs Casualty and Surety Company of Amettea Bv- C.R. Ilernandez, Attoiney-ui-I tact 21 I Iit 1Y EI ERS(ASUALI Y AND SI)RE I Y COMPANY UI• AAIEVICA I RA V¢LERS CAS UALTS AND SLrREI Y L WIPA NY FARMINGPON CASUALTY COMPANY 11i rifard,Connecticut 06133.9D62 VONVER OF AI rORNEY AND CER IIFICA 1 E OF AUTHORITY OF ATTORNEY(S)-KhAC I KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENIS. 'Iiwr TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURL1Y COhIPANY OF AMERIC.A, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY C.OhIPANV and FARMINGiON CASUALTY COAH'ANY, corporations duly organized under the laws of the State of Connecticut;and having their principal offices in the City of Hartfoud, County of Hanford, State of Connecticut, (licreitafter the"Companies") hath made, constituted and appointed, dud do by then presents make,consulate and appoint Theodore C.Sewer,Jr„C IL Hernandri„Ralph E. Nosal,Katherine J Foreit,DehrA R. Kccbkr,Sandra Nowattowski,3oseph R.Popian ski,Shelly K.Szymczak,of Chicago, Illtnous, their true and lawful Atteirncy(s)- in-Fact,wsth full power and authority hereby cowfcrrcd to sign,crccuie and acknowledge, at any place w ntim the United States,the following msirunrcnt(s) by hislfter sole signature and act, any and all bonds, recognirnfices, contracts of todemtuty, and otter wntsngs obligatory in the nature of a bond,recognizance,or conditional undertaking and any and all conscros tacidtnt ilineiu And to '....... bind (fie Companies, thereby as fully and to the same extent as if the same were signed by the duly aulhonzod uMcers of the Compasurs,and all the acts of Said AUarncy(s)-tn-Fact,pursuant to the authority herein given,are hereby ratified and confirmed This apporntmcut is made under and by authority of the following Standing Resolutions of,said Companies, which R=lutions arc now in full force and effect ' VOTED- That the Cltturrrwlt the Picsida it,any Vice Chairman.airy Execubse Vice i'rcstdcrit,any Senior Vice President,uy Vitt 1'ravdent,any Second Vice President,ibe-Gwsuru,any Assistant 1-1 eactvef, the Corpotatt Sea etary or any Assistant Sanitary,may appoint Attonrcys-ui-FdCI and Agents to act for acid on behalf of the company and may gne such appointee such authority as his or ha ceeuficete of aulhnnty may prtscntc to sign oath the Company's resme and seal with din Compviy's seal bonds,recogrrvaiices,co,itrd_rs of mdemnJy,rind wha anlu,gs obhgatary in '... the iwuac of a Lwnd, tecogiuLuice,or cpachironal Ord,Wring,suit wiv of said officers or the Hoard of Uuteturs al arty acne aial remove any such appointee and revoke the pugcr given him or her _. VOTED That the Chauvnan,the Ficsideut, my Vice Chaumes,any Exccvuve Vice VivsOcni, any Senior Vice Pressdcut% wry Vac I'ressdcnu ',... may derogate all or any part of the foregoing authority to one or more officers or employees of bus Compwty,provided that mh such delegation is in writing and a copy thereof is tiled ra the offcc of die Secretary VOTED Thai any bond, recognizance, contract of Indemnity, or writing obligatory in the nature of a bond, recognvanre, or anndnmml undertaking shalt be valid and binding upon the Campos}Ami(a)signed by the President,any Vice Chamiuui,any Excculim Vice Presidein,air Senior Vim Nesident or any Vice President,airy Second Vice IYesldent,the T[CJSarer,any Assisted Treasurer, the Corpe,ale Secretary or Wv Assistant Smcetary surd duly atttsted and scaled with the(ompany's seal by a Secrc`.ary or Aaislanl Seciciary,or(b)duly evcauud(wider acdl,If "tract)by one or more Altomcys-tin-Fact acid Agents taasusim to the power prescnh-d in his or her ccilirkate or their cendicales of aulbady or by one or mtue Cunrpwiy ufrctis➢ur uzrit to a unllen delegabpn orauthonty Tbis Power of Attorney and Certificate of Authority is signed and sealed by racsimile (mecbanical or printed)under and by authority of the following Standing Rtsoiulion+pled by the boards or Directors of TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY and FARAIINGTON CASUALTY COMPANY,nhich Restrlulion is now in full force and effect. r I VOTED That the signature preach of the following oiTicers 1'reudenl,any Executuc thee Picndcnt, oily Scmor Vlce I'resldrnt, any Vice President, any Assistant Viee 1'rinident,any Secretary,any Assistnnt Secretary, and the cal of the Company may be niTiticd by facsnrule to ariy power of attorney or to any certificate relating drercto appointing Resident Vice Presideius,Rtsidcnt Assisiant Secretaries or Ationreys-ii Foci let purposes only of executing and attesting bonds and underlakrngs and othef%Tongs obligatory in the nature thereof,and any such poyscr of attorney _ of certificate bearing such faestmde signature or facsunde scat shall be valid and binding upon the Company and any such power so executed and certified by such facsimile signature and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon die Company in die futwu with rasped in any bnnd or undertaking to winch it is attached 22 STATE OF ILLINOIS COUNTY OF coax a Notary Public in and for said County, do hereby certify that C.R. lixnardez Attorney-in-Fact, of the Travelers Casualty and Surely Company A Coauecticul Corpatatlon Of America Traveler Casualty and Surely Company A Conoectkut Corporation Fsrmlarton Caamalty Company A Conntdicut Corporation who is personally known to me to be the same person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrtmernt, appeared before me this day in person, and acknowledged that they signed, sealed, and delivered said instrument for and on bebaif of! Travelers Casualty and Surety Company A CoeaeCicut Corporation Of Amwim Travelers Caaraltyand Surety Company A Coontcticot forgonttoa Farminttost Casualty Company A Connecticut Carporadoo for the uses and purposes therein set forth. (liven under my hand and notarial Seal at my office in the City of ChicAgo in said County, 2Ei day of Pbrdt A.D 2 Notary Public ••.......................... it + "OFFICIAL SEAL" DEDRA R. KEEBICR i Notary Pablw, State of lilaiois My Commission Expires 3130103 + 23 EXHIBIT C 1 I i 1 I 25 ,Ian rn itatnlnalun I )I-1'.a1. ,�11=f` I C )h Fr r11 ( 1t,1 NorOwt,I K11,0d60 (11f,fi tl0n If Of 114\,r-,It, Nr Itr l6 t,ir, N1�(an �fa•y ' '.JP:3-�Icl ' 1J ,+"7 'I',hf &019HSi I4 2002 RRGISTEIZUD h1AlL RR 359 892 W I1S No Phd Q t•urt Roung RaQ ( nrhonnton IIU Box 3707,MC 2R-79 Seaule, WA 98124.2207 Dear kir Ctih,nl KI- ih der 9 02SLA\'R-4579 (I S Army Curpo of Lnw+tq, 4 2000.4-01279-• %jur r)dahl) C L11111ca1ndl C tf t,l,d/oue Consl5lrnLy DtILt111111a111111 for Iropa,v,to 2 31 dcrts of ttLIla11d5 tin Ctpshucuan ut Rduhc Gatc.w, 1',tKi11B„ Ilarl+-Kent Wa<hnteton ['he Ieque,t lixcL:llficatlon for pfoposed Work In nedandsadlacent Io Noll Crethh.t, been ro+iettcd On bchadl u1 the We of Washlneton,tta(UhQ :hat We propoattl "K AS oulhnunul be the tntbtsttl Ufdcr, %vdl comply' nrth appliLaWc pnler,Iou,nl Sctnoo, 101 ,0'_', 101 3116 Ind 307 orow (Itdu water AU.as amcnthd and tnhu 4gipnTr .ne mquam »eflte 0 Mof. la•., I his letter also ic; as thf. W k re,pnnSc So dw Ftujin t1I I-AwInQu; Pul,uant In 10 11 S C 1 156 ct seq (Sec mn 307 X3)of the Co,Isbd /.nac h1:u.hunun 4LL(it 1972 as anicnded). l.ulhlgv concura 1%Ith dle,tN0u,uW%dwermlflmn" 191 Ihl, Rt"L"111110 C011W ILIM R11h Me aplxoved Washington State Co 1S1d1 Zone A4.ulagcmcnl I'logldn1 1111s umcuf rcucl. Is b.I,Ld upon the appllcmles Colilphami.,\,1111 all dl l)III.AbIC 011011,VdIIIC 11UhlAL`,ttI the C uasial /one Man1w11cm Ph+pain. mcludtng SdUlnn 401 of IIIa I rdcr,il Watct Pr'llututn Connol Act ThI, certlliLaunn Is sublecl to the cond mans contamed in the enclo,cd nrder If)ou have dnyque,nllns- please eont.Icl Ahce lteH) at (4'_s)G 19-71 ii "I laud tontine nl,tan be ,tul In hu at the IX pdt1mtM ❑f [:colony 3190— 160 Ave SE, i3L11c,ue WA 9900' I he u1Lhlnul OIdu ma) he appealul by f0110t+111g the ffoL.C(larc, tletiu thud in the r)rdcl r Slnu•IcJy I . . Icannlc Sunune111ays Slrglclan(Is .uxl I:mnnlnninidl Assiatmlce l'Ioelnrn I% al, 11 lunathm SnUd%(`fltp4 A I UVIII u, I.,111y 1 l,hcl• WDI W WNIML(Ilna LLUWg) 1-hrls Muni, Pr OIL(-I DMIC11,101 I.lut W, Rulh 26 DEPARTMFN I' OF ECOLOGY NOR•1'IIWFST RECIONAI, OFFiCE TN THE ATATTER OF GRANTING A } ORUBR M 02SLANR-4579 ','PATER QUALITY } ('orps Rekrence h 2000-4-01279 C'E RA IFICATTON TO ) Placement of 1i11 in 2 l9 acres of v edands f6i tho Boeing Realty Corporation } construction of Pacific Gatc,ca} Yusui> ss Park in III ,accordance with 13 U,S.0 I' 1 ) Kent, located Ili Sections 2 and 11, T . 3? N . k T-WPCA § 401, RCW 90.48 260 ;ind } 4 E . King C:ouiity, 1b`aslun�tun Chapter 173-201A i.>,'AC } TO: Mr. Phil Cybmt Rocing Realty Corporation PO Box 3707, MC 2R-79 Seattle, WA 98124-2207 On May G, 2UO2, a public notice fora proposed Neater quality certification fiom the State 0f W nshington was distributed for the above-referenced project pursuant to the prutitsons of 33 1'.5 C. 1341 (FN PCA §401) 1 ho proposed project entails placement cal'fill Im construction of a business park F inmtcd vvetlnnd fill for road crossing isould be 0 49 acre. limWi igs, parking Ines anI landscaping will fill 17 acre. :uid U I2 uc rc �si11 be impacud b) a +-acre stoma tiler detenn0n pond, for a total Xtctl.uul III)paf�t ,uc.1 of? ;1 acres The off-site m III Ration proposal mcludcs creation of 48 acres ofpctlustune Coln .nt, stiub- shrub, and ibrested wetland on an I I-acre parcel located adiaccnt 10 Mill Crcck about i,t)OU feet nuitlicast of the proposed development. An additional 0.91 acres of existing low quality emergent and scrub-shrub wetland~ will be enhanced to a forested lloodplarn mtland. AUTHORI•T IFS: in cxcicisinb authonty under 33 U.S.0 1 141, 16 U S.0 1456, and RCW 90 .18 200, Ecology ha3 investigated this application pursuant to llic following Conformance AiIli applicable water gv,!lily-based, tecluiology-Cued, and lomc or prctrCLttrncnt cl[luent Imufations as piovided tnidci 13 I_- S C Sectiona 1111, 1311 1)13 1316, and 1317 (FWPCA Sectione A I1 ,01. 106 and 307), 2. CotiCorrnance >ailli tlic state v,,atci quality standards m pim ided form Uiahtcr 171-201 A WAC authorr7ed by 13 U S C. 1313 and by Chapter WAS P CW, acid 1\nh othei apprupriaie rcyuircmcnts of Sintc law and i Canlurnim!ee itllli the provision of ti-,nlg all lJI0Wr1. .1%aildble curd icasonable methuds to prevent a11c1 conliol p0ilut!on of state waters as icgimed by RCW 90 49 010 i i Ur der +- 02tiL-4,Y 27 .hrgim 19, 2002 Page 2of0 CONDITIONS Or ORDER# 02SFANR-4579 AN 1)Ny.,V[L:IZ t.)UALrtY CL1211FICATION: In > icu' 01 the fc++u+_ou3� and m accnuTancc ic�ih 33 L) S (1 1 i-41. `)0 -lt; 2G0 3�C\\ .lid f'h,tpiri 173-201 4 ;\'A('_l01ei quahti certification is `canted to Boeing Really Corporaunn suhieci to the tollm;.Ing conditions A. No Impairment of Watrr (duality: ; A] Certification of this proposal does not authorize Boein.v Realty Corporation to exceed tipphcable state 1.%MCr quality standards (Chapter 173-201 A WAQ of sediment quakily ntandaids (Chapter i73-2043 %V;%Q. Water quality ciireiia contained in VAC 173 201;1- 030(1) iiid 1VAC 173-201A-0.10 shall apply to this project, unless othci;;ise authorized by Ecology I his Order does not authorize temporary exceedaaces of n ater quahty .,rondinds hcyond the limits cslahlisticd ni \VAC 173-201 A-110(3) Purthcimoic, ootlnng to tits ceitifiLation shall absolve Boeing Realty Corporation fiom liability fni cojitammationand any subsequent cleanup of uu(acce i'.aters or sediments occurring as a result ofpioject conSlruUlon or operations_ Mill Cieek has hcen identified on the 1998 303(d) list as cuceduw state niter quality 4andards for dissolved d+wgrn fecal coltfatui, and tenllmattuc 1 Ills Inupowd ptulect c,hall not result in firrRrei eNceedanccs of these .taridal d:. I Project Mitigation; i lit. Impacts to aquatic resources shall be mitigated through measures described ui the ('olloNNing documents, cacept as modified by this Outer • Wetl ind Mitigation Plan (Revised) Pacific Gaicivay gnstness Park, picpaicd by Chad Annour, dated August 2002 0.. Response letter from Chad Armour, dated August 15, 2002. . j • Wdhind Nliticaiian Planting plan, Sheets, WT 2 and W1 3, prepared by Paighausen, i dated revisions July 22 2002 • 1-inal Guiding For 1Vetland Mitigation. Sheet 1, prepared by 13ar11hauscn, dated( j reVtsiozis July 23, 2002 132 "As-Built" Report: An "as-built" report dounnenling the lin.tI design Oftlic nnQs goon project area shall be prepared when site constnicuon and plaonnQ is completed I he 1CP0+1 shall include the following: • Vlcuuty map showing site access, Final site ropogiaphy_ • Dtawins that shall clearly identify the ouunti;ntrs o( the nuhgatscn.ua.is • Che installed planting scheme showing quantities, dcnait cs, sizes, and :p1,\uxim,ifc lucntions of plant-, as ,VCll M ]Inns ,oarces And the hind of planting., Orrlei a U2SE,1A9i-,579 28 Jugim 79, 2002 I'mgt 3 of A I'huu>Claphs of the aten taken from permanent rcfereocc polltts Locations of photopoatts sampling and manitering stles. An meal}sis of any chances to the imitrgauon plan that occurred dill im, construction A copy (if the "as-built" Iepol1 'hall he sent to I)cptulincnt uflxolvCy I Mersa I'cun:t Cocidmmor ;190 16C1'I' Avenue Sh,ilellcvue. \V 1, 95008- .152,vv.tttnt OO days of complelutg coitsliuction and nuti,tl pl,ui(nig, ,Ind It,no case later than Deccmbcr 31,2003 Deed ResITIL1.101) 11crmaacnl protcuton of thewtiland mi`ogation;md prescrvatton,ne,s, as de5CIlbCd tit WMind Nimpntian Plan (Revised) P,«laic G,gev.ay l3usriicss Park, prepated by Chad Armour,dated August 2002.shall he iecoided on the appropi late property deal I Ilk:deed bItell -fully indicate that the wetland Inlligattcn areas ate 'v�aters of the slate' Documentation that this requmenienl has been fulfilled, including cupies of permanent restrictive casements,shall be provided to Ecology's 1'cdcul Permit CUatdindtOr at die came tune as the"as-hut It" repai t i i lead Supery stint 1 ire wetland nuhPtlolt gl.tdtng ltln•ity and plant installation shall be field-super tsed and inspected by C had Amtnur. I I C or other qualified consultam(s)to ensure proper elevations arc,mbicted and proper p1m cm tit ofpl.utts Monitnrnt Monitoring sliall be conducted as Identified in %VctLutd Mitigation P1211 (Re,iced) PdeifiC e3atca7ly Business pack ptepined by ( had Armour (),tied Augusi 2002 Copies of all monitoring reparth shall he submitted to Fuilogy dt 1190— (CO A•,emitSL Bellevue, %VA y8008-5452 as t+all as to the U S Army Corps of Lngmecte I1 the rcudh of the ntonitunng ntdccatc chat conunecncp measures nic nradui the numitunngreport shall ntclude a detailed clescrgttinn of actions taken to rectify deficiencies If the results of the monitoring at Year IO shoo that the mitigation area does not salrsfv the peifmnlance standards scl folth in the mrugation plan,additional mumlunng and innrgation may be icquired (e g,replanting,sod amendments,selection of altemative species, re-cs atuation of the I1crIcri)tdrl6C Staudards.c(c ) Any additional ❑ unilonng ur mitigation iticasmen dre subacc.t to tcvievr and appiov all of the Department of Iscolo;y i\lamicnmmcc file applicant Is iecponstblc for matmcnancc of the v�ctlamd uult;",lhon all i such that lie required performance standmds ate met Access. Boeing Kealty t`nq nrntirnt shall piov x1c access to[Ile nuhgauon bile upon regtmt by i ecology Im sonnel for site inspections,monitome.and net.essan dita cullccunn in ensure that the Weiland malg,luon Is mrplenwtted is appiou d Botmdary M.mkinu Cie houndary Cif the\%cl Lind Ill,I'gallon site shall be perutdnctttly ntml.ed tvnh stakes spaced appro,%int.uely 100 feet apall Ilse inalkine shall include Slgriage dint c.lcarty tndtc<ucs th.n ciao in>;vct;W.dien,utd icrulvcNpcs[tude applic.nu+m .tic prnhihned vv'i flit n the mitignh,an area and that no mates sal inc IudI I',"Nod N.urtl vCl�LAlnon shall he dumped ++ohm the wetland nul+f_atinn area. i tlrrler 4 02SE4A1p 29 ;fugtrtl 19, 002 pagc 1 of() C. Construction: C 1 C'onsttuction Stomlwaler and Frown Control :t '\Voi : in tit near waters o(ihe state nhalI be done so as to mnuntt e ttul {+tat., erosion, and other water quality impacts Coltstruction storrutt-atcr, sc:linwill and erosion cornett Best Manogement Ptactices suitable to ptovctit eutedmu ,, tit u<ur eater quality stand irds (e g , liar bales, detention areas, lifter lrtutti, etc.),small I-,c in place More slatting cleating, filling. ind grading t+orti at the impact sacs. and shall also comply with all requirements of the NPDl-S Permits b. I'dor to clearinmo and guiding in wetlands, the adlacettt wetlands shall be protected do n construcuon Impacts. Consttuciton fencing or flagging (using brightly colored tape at no less than twenty-live. Ibot (25') nitei v tlsj of UIJ csisting netlands and ~ream channels to be protected Shall be completed pnnr to clean g All prpicct stalfshall br trained to iccogmze construe troll fencing or flagging Ihal identifies wetland boundaries. Equipment shall not he moved into ni operated in netlands or stream channels that are not authorized to be liked ( I C2 During cleating and filling at the project sites, the appl;cant shall take .dI nece,.nr) measures to muumizc the altcianonor drsttubancc of cm, lmg iwiland and up],ind C= All coustruutiun debris steal l he pioperly dkposccl of on land so that it Cvtnot cntcr a N+atenvay or cause water quality degradation to state twlter,, C4. Wash haler containing oils, Crease, Or athef 11dGnrdOUS nmicuals resulting irum wash down of equipment or working areas shall be contained far pr nper disposal. and shall not be discharged into state waters or storm drains, t: 5. Boeing Realty Corporation shall provide notice to Ecology's Alice KLII) at latst 3 days prior to nhc su+rt of placing fi I in netlands or otherAVQ1Cis of the state Nolificanon can lake place by e-mail to Li i ]d6lriActy st_ _ ti, wl-:phonc to ( 12=) 619.7115, la: to (425) 649-7098, or in ttrnlinC i i lean Fill C'nttena Boeing Realty Corporation shall ensure that fill placed for the propo,,ed proleet does riot Lo niam to%ic materials in tome amuunls I). En>crgcncylContin+ envy Nfcasures: D 1 - In the event Boeing Realty Corporation is unable to comply «nth aril of ll:c pcninit terms and conditions due to auy cau,e, the app1IL,L nL shall • ltnmcdtalely take action to stop contain, and clean up nn^itthot t;ed dist hatgcs tit otherwise Stop the vtolation and correct the problem. Ch der ',023E.JNR-4.5:. 30 Au,r+st 19, 2002 Pclte j of fi • Notify Lcolegy of tiro failure t0 comply Spill cscnts .ha11 he iepoitcd iuniiodi.dcly to I-cology's 24-Hour Spill Response Team at (425) 649-7000, and illnn 34 bows to Ecology's Alice Kelly at (42i) 049-7145 • Submit a detailed »NTAIen report to i cology %mthin iii e days tli,it dtunhes the nature of the violation. Currectnvc action taken ;nld/ol planued %tepS to be taken to presrnt it I Mir IUce. r MlIts of any �amhles taken, and any other pettnietit infra matron Compli:ancu wall tliis conditiou does not iclievc the applicant (•iom responsibility to nlauitnun continuous compliance the terms and conditions cif this Order or the resulting liability ftom failure to connpl} 1312. fuel hoses,oil drums, oil or fuel transfer salves and fittings, elo., shall he checked regularly for ditps or leaks, and sliall be maintained and stored piopcily to prewilt spills into state waters. Aro relueling ul'equipmonl sliall occur m er, or ssithm A feet of creeks or tvetlan(ls I'. other Petntits and Approvals.• • SPPA Determination of Nonsigmlicancc ivied by the City of Kent. 5cptembcr 21, 1999 • Hydraulic 1'nycil Appiovol (Fil'ai I no No (lo-1,)1179-02 nqucd on Nlay 17. 2002 • XPDES G(!ncral Permits k 503-00.802A and S03-004424 F. General C'nnditiom: 1=1. For purposes ofthis Older, the term ` Applicant-shall mean Boeing Realt) Corporation and its agents, assigns, and contractors F'2. 'I his certification does not exempt and is provisional upon compliance with other statutes and codes administered by fedei al. state, and local agencies. i•i. 'rise applicant trill be out of Lump I[ance svrih this celtili(ation irlhe plo,1W isconsuactcd and/or operated in a manner not consistent with the prolect desciiption contained in the Public Notice for certification, or as others tse approved by T'cology Additional mitigation measures may be required i}irouzh other local, stair, or Icdaral requirements F4 The applicant +till Ise out of compliance with Ibis certification and must ieappiy it,iih tin updated application if live y cars clnpw iiCix�Cerl the date of the iauanc c of this ccru(icaLon and the beginning of construction andror d)scharge for vdvch tlnc federal incense or pemnit is bung caught 1-5 The ;applicant will be out of coniphancc with this cLruiication and must ieapply tsith an updated application if the uifonnatlon curttauicd tin the Public Notice i5 voided by subsequent submittals to the fedet al agency •1m• future action ,a this project location, 31 At-wi +r 19. 200, PiNe 6 ofC emergency or otherwise, that is not defined In Ilic Public Nutice, or has not been dFlumed by Ecology, is not authorized b) this t)idcr All futute actions shall he enoidinnted wdh Pcolog) for approval ptiur to implementation of such action. 17-6 Copies of this Order shall k,Le pt om the job site and readily dvaildblc for rcicrence b} Fcolog) pcimnnel, the construction superintendent, consliuction nianageis and iiIrcmcn, and state and loLal govrrntiunt inspectors To avoid viol atioms or nun-compliance avid) tins Order, the tipphcant ;hall emine Ihat prt?lcel Inanagers,cnnstraclron supelIIltendeuls. and other responsible parties have read and understand relevant aspects of this 01 dcr.the j NPDFS permits,and any subsequent revision or Ecology-approved plans 1.7 '1 he applicant shall provide access to the prcllect site and all mitigation sites upon request by Geology personnel for site inspections,inonitoring, necessary data collection, or to ensure that conditions of this Order are being met F8 Nothing in this Order waives Ecology's alithorily to Issue additional ordcis if 1:cnlog) determines further actions are necessary to implement the hater quality laws of the state Further, Ecology retains continuing jurisdiction to make mochlieutions hereto through suppleinental older, if additional impacts due to project comliuctton or operation are identified (e g, violations of %vtiter quality titindards, downstream erosion, ctc ), or if addillonal conditions are necessary to further protect the public inlerc5t P9. htnbht Any person who fails to comply with any piowisiorr of this Order shall he b.ihle for a penalty, of up to ten thoo;and dollars ($10,000)per c iolation foi each day of continuant,noncompliance Appeal Proecss: Any person aggrieved by this Otdcr may obtana ieview thereof by appeal, within thirty (30) days of receipt of this Order, to the Washington Pollution Control Hearings lloard,P.0 Box 40903. Olympia, tVA 98504-0903. Concurrently, a copy of the appeal must be sent to the Department of Ecology, Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Piogiarn, P O. Rot 47600 OI)nipia, WA 9R504-7600, These procedures are consistent the piuvisions of Chapter 43 3113 R CW and the rules and regulations adopled thereunder Dmcd f� f��'2_ at Bellew lie. Wash]iigion Jeannie Sunrmethays. Section Manager Shorelands and Ewe tionnacntal Asetstancc i'rnvimi Department of Ecology Statc of l4'a;hnit,ton i 33 i EXHIBIT D 35 1 i 1 1 United States Army Corps of Engineers / ]G 2 3 2032 A permit to FILL219 ACRES OFI ETLANDSONA240•ACRE SITE FOR THE COMTRUCTIONOF.A BUSINESS PARKI'FO DEVELOP AND ENSURE AN ECON(WICALIN A')ABLE BUSINESS PARK THAT M CE IS THE EXISTING MARKET DEMAND)IN WETLANDS..A IACENT TO THE GREED RIVER ON THE BOEING SPACE CE\TER PROPFRTY at KI:\T. 'A A. -H1\G;0\ has been Issued to BOEI\G READYCORPORATION 0fI Address of Permittee POST OFFICE BOX +707 NIC2R-79 SEATTLE WASlllNGTON 4812a-2207 Permit Numbers 20004-01279 .ALPH 11. GRAPE t fL COLONEL,CORPS OF ENG{\EERS DISIRICPCOMMAN'DER ENG FORM 4335.Ja181 (ER 11d5 2 3D3) EDITQN CF Jt1L%.t.1AY BE L$ED t"rap;rRr,C DAEN-LIY0j I i I 36 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT Pernvttee Boeing Really Corporation Boeing Really Corporation Post office Box 3107,k1C 211-79 Permit No 2000-4-01279 Seattle,Washington 98124-2207 Issuing Office Seattle Distort No rE The ternt'`you'and its derivatives, as used in this permit, means the permdlee or any fixture transferee The term 'this office" refers to xhe appropriate district or dr%Islon office of the U.S Anny Cuips of Engineers (Corps) having Jurisdiction over the permitted activity or the appropriate official of that office acting under the authority of the commanding officer You are authorized to perform work In accordance with ilia terms and conditions specified below Project Description Place fill in 2 19 acres of wetlands on a 240-acre site for the construction of a business park (Pacific Gateway Business Park)in accordance with the plans and drawings attached herblo which are incorporalad in and made a part of this permit Ito develop and ensure an economically viable busyness park Thai meets the existing market demand for large distribution warehouses, data center,and manufacturing facilities compatible with die adjacent Space Center facd4ies) The amount of wetlands to be filled for road crossings is 0 49 of an acre Buildings and parking tots will cover 1 7 acres of wetlands. An additional 0 12 of an acre of wetlands would be incorporated into a 3-acre stormwater detention pond Total wetland impact area is 2 31 acres Boeing Realty Corporation will also create another 1 nacre detention facility in uplands on the project site Project Location In wetlands adjacent to Ilse Green River on the Boeing Space Center propenyat Kent, Washington Permit Conditions Genera]Conditions 1 The time limit for completing the work authorized ends on P,UG 2 3 a7JS If you find that You neec more time to complete the authorized activity,submit your request for a time eylenslon to this office for consideration at least 1 month before the above date is reached 2 You must maintain the activity authorized by this permit in good condition and in accordance with the terms and conditions of this permit You are not relieved of iNs requirement if you abandon the permitted activity, although you may make a good faith transfer to a Ihird party in compliance with General Condition 4 below Should you wish to cease to maintain the authorized activity or should you desire to abandon it without a good faith transfer, you must obtain a modification to this permit from this office,which may require restoration of the area 3 If you discover any previously unknown historic or archeological remains while accomplishing the activity authorized by this permit,you must Immediately notify this office of what you have found We will initiate the Federdl and State coordination required to determine if the remains warrant a recovery effort or if the site Is eligible for nsixng In the National Register of Historic Places 4. If you sell the properly associated with this pennd, you must obtain the signature of the new owner in the space provided and forward a copy of the permit to this office to validate the transfer of this a itwr zabon 5 If a conditioned water quality celhflcation has been issued for your project,you must comply with the conditions specified in the certification as special conditions to this permit For your convenience, a copy of the certification Is attached If it contains such conditions. 37 BOEING REALTY CORPORATION 2000-4-01279 6 You must allow representatives from this office to inspect the authorized activity a(any fare deemed necessary to ensure that it is being or has been accomplished in accordance with the teems and conortions of your perrnd. 7 After a detailed and careful review of all the conditions contained n this permit the permi.tee acknowledges that,although said conditions were required by the Corps, nonetheless the poi nittee acieed to those conditions volunlanly to fac,litate issuance of the permit, the permdlee will comply hilly with all the testis of At the permit conditions Special Conditions a. The Wetland Mitigation Plan (Revised)Pacific Gateway Business Park, Kent, Washington dated August 2002 must be implemented Mitigation monitoring reports will be due in years 1, 2,3, 5, 7, and 10 after the Corps' written acceptance of the as-built drawings All ieporls must be submitted to US Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District, Regulatory Branch and must prominently display the reference number2000-4.01279 b A status report on the mitigation construction, including as-built drawings, must be suhmitted to the U S Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District, Regulatory Branch, 13 months from the date of permit issuance Anaual status reports on miticatien construction are required until mitigation construction is complete c The wetland area created, restored and enhanced as mitigation for work authorized by this pennd, shell not be made the subject of a future individual orgeneral Department of the Army peimhl application for fill or other devetopment, encept for the purposes of enhancing or restoring the mitigation associated wrh this p,oject In addition, a description of the mitigation area identified in the final mitigation plan as approved,and any subsequent peroot rruugation area revisions, will be recorded with the Registrar of Deeds or otter appropriate official charged with the responsibility for maintaining records to or interest in real properly Proof of this documentation mubt be provided to the Corps of Engineers, Seattle District%vilhin 60 days of the issuance of this permit d You niust implement the ESA requirements and/or agreements set forth in the Biological Evaluation Pacific Gateway Business Park, Kent, Washington, dated August 2000, and the addendum dated August 2001,in their entirety- The U S Fish and Wildlife Service(USFWS) concurs ed with a finding of"may affect, not likely to adversely affect" based on this document on June 4, 2001 (USFWS Reference Number 1-3-02-1.0780) The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)concurred with a finding of"may affect, not likely to adversely affect" based on this document on April 15,2002 (NMFS Reference Number WHB-02-055) Both agencies will be informed of this permit issuance and will enforce any known violations of the commitments made in this document pursuant to the ESA e You must provide a copy of the permit transmittal letter, the permit Corm, and drawings to all contractors poi forming any of the authorized work Further Information 1. Congressional Authorities You have been authorized to undertake the activity described above pursuant to O Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbor Act of 1899 (33 U S C 403), (X) Section 404 of the Cleat Water Act(33 U S C 1344) ( ) Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 U S C 14 13) 38 BOEING REALTY CORPORATION 2000 4 01279 2 Limits of this authorization a Tf his permit does not ob,.iale II e deed to obtain ocher Federal, State, or local authorization requuEd by law b This permit does not grant any propci ly rights or exclusive privileges 0 This permit does not authorize any injury to the property or rights of others d This permit does not authorize interference with any existing or proposed Federal project 3 Limits of Federal Liability In issuing this permit, the Federal Government does not assume any liability for the following I ❑amages!o the perm itted projector uses thereof as a result of other permuted actiait es or from natural caUseis b Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of current or future activities undertaken by or on behalf of the United States in the public interest. c Damages to persons, property, or to other permitted or unpermitted activities or structures causcd by the acliv,ly authorized by this pewit e Design or construction def�cirnc,es assoctcled vr+th the perm tted 11erk e Damage claims associated with any future modification, suspension, or revocation of finis permit 4 Reliance on Applicant's Data The determination of this office that issuance of this permit is not contrary to the public interest was made in reliance on the information you provided 5 Reevaluation of Permit Decision This office may reevaluate its decision on this permit at any time the circumstances warrant Circumstances that could require include, but are not limited to, the following a You fail to comply with the terms and conditions of the permit b The information provided by you in support of your application proves to have been false, incornpIrle of inaccurate (See 4 above) o Significant new information surfaces which this office did not constder in reaching the ongipal public a^tr_rest decision Such a reevaluation may result in a determination that it is appropriate to use the suspension modification,and revocation procedures contained in 33 CFR 325 7 or enforcement procedures such as those contained in 33 CFR 326 4 and 326 5 The referenced enforcement procedures provide for the issuance of an administrative order i equiring you to comply with the terms and conditions of your penTid and fur the uulialion of legal aufion where appropriate You will be required to pay for any uorrer live measures orcered by this office, and if you fail to comply ,vith such directive, this office may in certain situations (such as those specified in 33 CFR 20917D)accomplish the ,.or reclive, measures by contract or otherwise and bill you for the cost i i 7 N r m � ce p 2 cu m o r a v c � � m 3 m � CD M m u zi ca p > o o :3 77 m 0 -0 a = m o N A o C ! c 3yrn o � rnr, uc° O g CD � m (D Ci f� ID CD 0 CD G ru 'D tY{} fi Q CD w cm CL f4 Q N Q Q N r' 7 (D h --j CD O 6 r fD i d O m CD ffep 1 zr 0 Co to c V o cr w ° m { CD m m CG7�J ¢ N N W O b d SU r� � �' O '. N a. N a O S X lD [S tp ( C' 4^� 4 SD D c; KD m c o m •� a < T3 m � A' � ^ ° � {. o Q d N @ •� -n 3 00 @ " D D w A m N O L�. m h7 c - p 1J 4 rL • A •f N a CL �� ! CD ^C O p ro y r a m Cs o 0 4 j G � CC N p � 5r, � I. zT Q O fD 2 ao as - _ KAmA4^[47 5, '91 N01 TQ SCALE � I T S 190:h ST o � l OP qo a LOT 4 �I ^ (MITIGATION 5 1941h 5T ,I, „ r'j 1 AREA) r 4' I PACIFIC I w f GATE j BUSINESS S 202^d ST PARK r _ I j SthST 1 N i x J y 1 c 212t77 ST I______,_} FIGURE 1 VICINITY MAP Atrersnn; 2090-0-1:%9 Purpore: Optuwc Bee=Facilmn AppUr•tlaa try: Oacmg Reelly Civpoa4cm "Reduce Swqlca ;1 rsr :.LII Cr k !n: City of Rent I Red L'rtalt Drtom. NGVU!929 Count, Y=g Slate WA Frnpored:Dlumcm Perk AdlAa•t Prepectl 011ven:Sxx aY.a:}sutal: Shear: I efS Dete,71 Aug2W) oATq lz xo/oa It 1+em Cx.aura, 3 rct\Glens\smxr�bsJnoW�wCI dq '. iao�IL^aarg's,a L'r:cCr 12n5'CC 'n G7 C m y, Nl I -CJ `yk`u Uym m 5s a. sm b I Iyg 'v t T K e I A tb+ski. �a�A$ - j i y 2 - r'ee � w __ •,� it 'Pal- GI ` O A _ I �g r r- � b O 42 0 700 1400 I— WETLAND ,!+' Sole in Feet {I II � �! WETLAN 4 to be rived J + PA i WETLAND ST rt' 4ApAQ'. 7 to remain WETL ND 1= ),' 1 Partd fill t" BCEING SPACE CENTER $ (existing und6slrml developneit) � q-y PP.G!K!G GATEWAY 9USINE33 PARK W 1. I 6 { WFTLANO 9SC 1 WETLAND Id to be exaovated to be fitlad w � WETLAND 1 W to a CJI-6 d'� � I fill i a WETLAND J WETLAND SIC2* I { to be Wed I to be excavated �J�YYETLAND SW ' ! {'r Ito be, filled o reman , W ERAN SSC 2.-w+ SVINCC FIGURE 3.JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS gerenaue: 2oeat1-1219 Purpose: Opwwse Boma FW111b s App1J tlorbr Hceiog RealtySurpoeunoo end Reduce Smpl a 'N"r. MrtlC=k Sw City of Kent Real Esute Dateau NGV➢1929 Coaaty: Yoij Rate W4 Prop:wd:��H::aw="Yank AdJacaut Property Owuen• See avubmaot Stied:4o[8 rcvbd�iei Aa$ibig W nnME 12 fca mv�'mnour�ewl,olca-.exos a.e b Ain 9 ` f — S. 192ND STREET 1 a � o g frn 7 iZF �. ge 9 p, C C r s }e y > 3 i y EM 3 c�a"@ ip A m " gi9 �6t �� p a z g &9IL gfi�� g3 S I PillIT 8 E � wa3 Mm me a 6 & S 196TH STREET 44 II W W U J 22 FT 22 FT 13 5 FT 13 FT EAST WEST A A 0 60 120 Approximate Scale in Feet n i r c n a u c 0 v FIGURE 5: CONCEPTUAL MITIGATION RrPr rena zo(�-0.1 7`7 rj CROSS SECTION - LOT 4 Application b?t A.•ung Reilo(unmrion Purpose• Opum>e DJ jog l an hues -kid Redu;e Surp hli \ear: �1dlCa n�t, In fn)of}:cri $ . Cuuntr. king SLlic• 91 '...,... REE Real btau 9atum- NGVD 1029 cr� Pmpo�ed- Plus•^css Park Adjacent Pm cherl 1)ah 71 4 i_= tUptrtl 0"mrs tx ada:hm:nt i a � Rn Zh .�z tai t/i J Tjg i rot �nt[y "' 4� � �• �� �� � ,i � � III V = dl P .,•r�+ YY . i '� '.`"^�—.,�� Zvi��J � '•�+� 1 •�-�I....r I+iD3k]F'+:iEii` "' / 1. e. �t�^�.7�I•..��' 3t r' 'J .1-n.18T+o3G:k.TG:.t..:.,, dale't.•, I(f K•.. NNW T)klj tt;lsla cFLsp EYSI7F!G CFJ.OE Ai r ' � CEWERLIME OF ROAD m I �kCJ 'l cry aax _ I i v rry `n U lNii N III z' NN W 'G G � x n J}p0 7+00 z SOUTH 199" Place SECTION 'A` SCRL'301*.10' 1'..5' VERT 30 Z �p o � ® 0 'EA m ASFI{4T PAVEMEKT I DE 25 i z 25 SIDE SLOPE00 '' s�' oF 0 sn 2 _ —_ --y zo � � ———— — — E1ISING GP,FAE` 0l5ECT704 '8" Q 15 m Z y I I '7' SOUTH 199`t' Place SECTION TB' SW.E Y—a0' 7'�5 vEaT '.. -- -- — 47 I Table 1 — Kctland erras on the Pacific Gateway SlUsinrsi 1'ar L,vle __ _ Wetland Acres Cleseirtcetion Fune}ton Position ! B =51 Palumrinc emergent Lnw so Ml.dn m IDrasnaee dtrc4 r= 06o Palusinne emergent Loin jShahow dcpression Y G 036 Paltistrmc cmcrgcnr Lou swat c ,14 024 Palusmne emeracm _Lowis-Alt 1 013 Palusnme emergent Lew 5he.lio.dcptusmon 1 1 003 Palumne cmergent Lew Atoswela Ull 071 PalUsrrtnc a mrrgeni Lcw Shallnw depresston SSCI DP_ Paiusome emergent Law ©reswale SSC2* 104 °alumme e;nergcnl and Law to Med'mn �Deimtion pord scrub-shn:b ST Oil I'alustrme emargcm Low Shallow dcpre5110n SW 019 111alistrLpeemergent Low ,Ss.ahoWdepressron 'III (Subtotal 62 -h Lvt}larj s5c 2- nrr rjAkkte_1 Gj CorFs per 5'"h'CG l III p� 7 PURPOSE Ophrm,e 3ceing NAME Boeng Really Cum ( PRO-OSED Bus nesa Park Fa cilltres 2000.4-012 78 IN N:etlands rear thllCrvvk DA1 UN NGVD 1 a29 AT Ken: COUNTY King STATE WA ' SHEET 6 OF 8 _ DATE 3' At.o 2000 -- REvis6n 10 Ark dLo> 49 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Don E Wickstrom, P E Public Works Director • Phone 253-856-5500 Fax 253-856-6500 KET1T wn s e t n o r o n -Address 220 Fourth Avenue 5 i Kent,WA 98032-5895 I DATE: AMolute 8, 2003 TO; M and Kent Ctiy Council FROM: Dkstrom,Public Works Director SUBJECT: State Grant for Commute Trip Reduction Program MOTION: Recommend authorizing the Mayor to sign the Commute Trip Reduction Implementation Grant Agreement,WSDOT Agreement#GCA3655, upon concurrence of the language therein by the City Attorney and the Public Works Director. i SUMMARY: Commute Trip Reduction Implementation Agreement between the City of Kent and the Washington State Department of Transportation for the implementation of RCW 70 94 521, the Commute Trip Reduction Law The Agreement consists of terms and conditions for reimbursement from the State for costs incurred by the City for implementing the requirements of the State law BUDGET IMPACT No Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personnel Impact BACKGROUND: The City is required by state law to enforce the regulations specified in RCW 70 94 521. The City is then reimbursed by the State for costs incurred based on a formula devised by the State Dept of Transportation, Rail and Public Transit Section Although ibis is a two-year agreement, the amount of the reimbursement is determined on an annual basis The current year(July 2003- June 2004) funding for the City of Kent is identified as $54,647 This is a reduction of $16,816 17 from last year's state allocation The reason for the reduction is that the State DOT changed the formula they use to distribute the funds as allocated by the State Legislature Although they received the exact same amount of funding from the Legislature, they have divided that pie among a much larger pool of participants They have added a new county, Benton County,which will receive the Minimum County Allocation of$80,000 right off the top Plus, within King County the share of the pie is divided into smaller pieces because of the addition of the cities of Snoqualmie and North Bend Plus, the State will no longer fund services devoted to "Voluntary" worksites which reduced the City of Kent's per-worksite funding by 6 employers Mayor While and Kent Gtp Council Commute Trip Reduction Implementation Agreement-Authorize August 18,2003 1 50 Washington State City of Kent Department of Transportation 220 Fourth Ave South 310 Maple Park Avenue Kent,WA 98032-5895 PO Box 47387 Olympia,WA 98504-7387 Key Contact Person: Cathy Mooney Key Contact Person; T.J. Johnson Em to cr Federal ID#: 91-6001254 Agreement Start Date Completion Project Amount Project Title Number Date Commute Trip Reduction CCA3655 Jul 1, 2003 June 30, 2005 $54,647 Implementation This Agreement is made and entered into this I sl day of July, 2003, between the Washington State Department of Transportation, acting by and through its Secretary of Transportation, (hereinafter called "WSDOT") and C ity o f K ent (hereinafter r eferred to a s"Contractor")and said parties WITNESS THAT WHEREAS,RCW 70 94 521 through 70 94 551 requires cities, counties and towns containing "major employers," in counties with populations over 150,000,to develop ordinances,plans and programs to reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and Single Occupant Vehicle (SOV) commute trips, and thereby reduce vehicle-related air pollution, traffic congestion and energy use; WHEREAS,RCW 70 94 541 (2) provides for technical assistance to counties, cities,and towns in developing and implementing Commute Trip Reduction(CTR)plans and programs, WHEREAS,RCW 70.94.544 provides for distribution of funds for local CTR implementation efforts; WHEREAS,WSDOT desires to achieve trip reduction in order to improve the efficiency of the state transportation system and the quality of life for citizens of the State of Washington, WHEREAS, the Washington State Legislature's delay in approving continued funding for the CTR program requires this contract to be effective retroactive to July 1, 2003 to preserve continuity of program funding. NOW, THEREFORE, to consideration of covenants, conditions, performances and promises herein contained, the parties agree to the following terms and conditions Section 1 Purpose of Agreement The purpose of this Agreement is for WSDOT to provide funding to the Contractor to be used solely for activities undertaken to fulfill the requirements of RCW 70.94 521,et seq,and to implement tasks as described in Exhibit 11,Scope of Work This Agreement consists of the terms and conditions, and Exhibits 1, II and Ill,which by this reference are incorporated herein 51 i Section 2 Scope of Work The C ontractor a rid W SDOT w ill p erfonn all t heir d esignated t asks u rider t his A greenient a s described in Exhibit 11,Scope of Work. Section 3 Time for Beginning and Completion The work to be performed under this Agreement shall commence July 1,2003, and terminate on June 30, 2005,unless terminated sooner as provided herein. Section 4 Reimbursement and Payment WSDOT shall reimburse the Contractor for eligible expenditures not to exceed $54,647 during the first fiscal year of the contract period. The maximum amount of funding for the Contractor was determined using the methodology contained in Exhibit 1, Funding Allocation Methodology WSDOT will reimburse the Contractor only for actual and eligible direct project costs. Payment will be made on a reimbursable basis Payment is subject to the submission to and approval by WSDOT of properly prepared invoices accompanied by progress reports and financial summaries The Contractor shall submit an invoice (state form A-19) or WSDOT approved invoice format to WSDOT in order to receive reimbursement. The Contractor shall submit invoices up to 4 times per fiscal year, or up to eight times during the course of this contract. The Contractor shall submit a final invoice to WSDOT no later than July 15, 2005. Any payment request received after July 15, 2005 or fifteen (15) days of the termination date, whichever is applicable, will not be eligible for reimbursement_ Within thirty (30) days after receiving the invoice and upon approval, WSDOT shall remit to the Contractor a warrant for payment. All invoices and warrants shall be based on and paid on actual work performed and actual costs incurred up to the maximum amount identified in this Agreement Section 5 Project Records The Contractor agrees to establish and maintain for the project either a separate set of accounts or accounts within the framework of an established accounting system, in order to sufficiently and properly reflect all eligible direct and indirect project costs claimed to have been incurred in the performance of this Agreement Such accounts are referred to herein collectively as the "Project Account" All costs claimed against the Project Account must be supported by properly executed payrolls, time records, invoices, contracts, and payment vouchers evidencing in proper detail the nature and propriety of the charges Section 6 Progress Reports The Contractor shall submit to WSDOT progress reports as described in Exhibit 11, Scope of Work, so that WSDOT may adequately and accurately assess the progress made by the Contractor and third parties to this Agreement in implementing RCW 70 94 521 et seq These reports shall be submitted to WSDOT along with any request for reimbursement submitted pursuant to Section 4, Reimbursement and Payment. Page 2 CCA3655 52 Section 7 Audits,Inspections, and Records Retention WSDOT, the State Auditor, and any of their representatives shall have full access to and the right to examine, during normal business hours and as often as they deem necessary, all of the Contractor's records with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement Such representatives shall be pennitted to audit, examine and make excerpts or transcripts from such records, and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, payrolls, and other matters covered by this Agreement. In order to facilitate any audits and inspections, the Contractor shall retain all documents, papers, accounting records, and other materials pertaining to this Agreement for six years from the date of completion of the project or the project final payment date However, in case of audit or litigation extending past that six years penod, then the Contractor must retain all records until the audit or litigation is completed The Contractor shall be responsible to assure that it, WSDOT, the State Auditor, and any of their representatives, retain comparable audit rights with respect to subcontractors to the Contractor within the scope of this Agreement Section 8 Agreement Modifications 1. Either party may request changes to this Agreement, including changes in the Scope of Work Such changes that are mutually agreed upon shall be incorporated as written amendments to the Agreement. No variation or alteration of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by authorized representatives of the parties hereto, 2. Any additional funding secured by WSDOT beyond the amount identified in Section 4, Reimbursement and Pa3 ment will be allocated to the Contractor for the period July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2005 in accordance with the methodology described in Sections 1 and 2 of Exhibit I,Funding Allocation Methodology. If an increase in funding by the funding source augments the Contractor's allocation of funding under this Agreement, the Contractor and WSDOT agree to enter into an amendment to this Agreement providing for an appropriate change in the Scope of Work and/or the project amount in order to reflect any such increase in funding. 3 If a reduction of funding by the funding source reduces the Contractor's allocation of funding under this Agreement, the Contractor and WSDOT agree to enter into an amendment to this Agreement providing for an appropriate change in the Scope of Work and/or the project amount in order to reflect any such reduction of funding. Section 4 Recapture Provision In the event that the Contractor falls to expend state funds in accordance with state law and/or the provisions of this Agreement, WSDOT reserves the right to recapture state funds in an amount equivalent to the extent of noncompliance. Such right of recapture shalt exist for a period not to exceed three (3) years following termmation of the Agreement. Repayment by the Contractor of state funds under this recapture provision shall occur within thirty (30) days of demand. Page 3 CCA3655 53 i Section 10 Disputes Any disputes between WSDOT and the Contractor with regard to this Agreement that are not disposed of by the project administrators assigned to supervise this Agreement shall be referred for determination to the Secretary of WSDOT, or his/her designee, as a condition precedent to the commencement of any legal action, accept as necessary to avoid the preclusive effects of any applicable contractual deadlines or statutes of limitation. Section 11 Termination WSDOT, at its sole discretion,may suspend or terminate this Agreement in whole, or in part, for the following reasons 1. The Contractor materially breaches,or fails to perform any of the requirements of,this Agreement, and after fourteen (14)days written notice,has failed to cure the condition(s) causing that breach; The Contractor materially breaches and, fails to remedy after fourteen(14)days written notice Conditions of breach may include,but not be limited to • Any action of the Contractor,which under the procedures of this Agreement wouldhave required the approval of WSDOT, taken without such WSDOT approval, • Failure to perform in the manner called for in this Agreement, and • Failure to comply with any provision of this Agreement 2. The Contractor is prevented from proceeding with the Project by reason of a temporary preliminary,special,or permanent restraining order or injunction of a court of competent jurisdiction where the issuance of such order or injunction is primarily caused by the acts or omissions of persons or agencies other than the Contractor; 3. The requisite state funding is reduced or becomes unavailable through failure of appropriation or otbenvise; 4 WSDOT determines that the continuation of the project would not produce beneficial results commensurate with the further expenditure of funds, 5 WSDOT, at its sole discretion, determines to accept a request made in writing by the Contractor to terminate The Agreement in whole or in part, or 6 WSDOT determines that suspension or termination is in the best interests of the state If this Agreement is terminated under subsections 2, 3, 4, 5, and/or 6 of this Section, then the Contractor may be reimbursed only for actual and eligible direct expenses under this Agreement incurred prior to the date of termination, and then only to the extent of appropriated funds If this Agreement is terminated under subsection i of this Section, then WSDOT shall not be obligated to provide any additional reimbursement past the effective date of that termination and WSDOT shall also retain all rights to seek recapture or damages from the Contractor If an appropriate judicial authority detemimes that the Agreement was improperly terminated under subsection 1 of this Section, then the termination shall be deemed a termination under subsection 6 of this Section with all attendant rights and limitations. Page 4 GCA3655 54 Section 12 Forbearance by WSDOT Not a Waiver Any forbearance by WSDOT in exercising any right or remedy hereunder, or otherwise afforded by applicable law, shall not be a waiver of or preclude the exercise of any such right or remedy Section 13 Waiver In no event shall any WSDOT payment of grant funds to the Contractor constitute or be construed as a waiver by WSDOT of any Contractor breach,or default which and shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to WSDOT with respect to any breach or default Section 14 independent Contractor The Contractor shalt be deemed an independent Contractor for all purposes, and the employees of the Contractor or any of its subcontractors and the employees thereof, shall not in any manner be deemed to be employees of WSDOT. Section 15 WSDOT Advice The Contractor bears complete responsibility for the administration and success of the Project as it is defined by this Agreement and any amendments thereto Although the Contractor is allowed to seek the advice of WSDOT on problems that may arise, the offering of WSD.OT advice shall not shift the responsibility of the Contractor for the correct administration and success of the Project, and WSDOT shall not be held liable for offering advice to the Contractor Section 16 Limitation of Liability and Indemnification No liability shall be attached to WSDOT or the Contractor by reason of entering into this Agreement except as expressly provided herein This Agreement is not intended to benefit any third party. The Contractor shall indemnify and hold WSDOT, its agents, employees, and/or officers harmless from, and shall process and defend at its own expense, any and all claims, demands, suits, penalties, losses, damages, or costs of whatsoever kind or nature (hereafter "claims") brought against WSDOT arising out of or incident to the execution, performance or failure to perform of or under tins Agreement, provided,however, that if such claims are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of(a) the Contractor, its agents, employees, and/or officers and (b) WSDOT, its agents, employees, and/or officers, this indemnity provision shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence of the Contractor, its agents, employees, and/or officers; and provided further that nothing herein shall require the Contractor to hold harmless or defend WSDOT, its agents, employees, and/or officers from any claims arising from the sole negligence of WSDOT, its agents, employees, and/or officers Page 5 CCA3655 i 55 Section 17 Hold Harmless It is understood and agreed that this Agreement is solely for the benefit of the parties hereto and gives no nght to any other party No joint venture or partnership is formed as a result of this Agreement Each party hereto agrees to be responsible and assumes liability for its own negligent acts or omissions, or those of its officers, agents or employees, and agrees to save, indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the other party from such liability Each contract for service or activities utilizing funds provided in whole or part by this Agreement shall include a provision that WSDOT and the State of Washington are not liable for damage or claims for damages arising from any city, town,designee or subcontractor's performance or activities under the terms of those contracts Section 18 Governing Law,Venue, and Process This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and the validity and performance thereof shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington. In the event that either party deems it necessary to institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any right or obligation under this Agreement, the parties hereto agree that any such action shall be initiated in the Superior Court of the State of Washington situated in Thurston County. The Contractor hereby accepts service of process by registered mail consistent with RCW 4 26 080(1) Each party shall bear its own legal costs and expenses, including attorney fees,in any such litigation The parties may bilaterally elect to submit their dispute to mediation or arbitration on such terms as are agreed upon by the parties Section 19 Compliance with Laws and Regulations The Contractor agrees to abide by all applicable state and federal laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, those concerning employment, equal opportunity employment, nondiscnmnation assurances, project record keeping necessary to evidence agreement compliance, and retention of all such records The Contractor will adhere to all of the nondiscrimination provisions in Chapter 49 60 RCW The Contractor will also comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Public Law 101-336, which provides comprehensive civil rights protection to individuals with disabilities in the areas of employment public accommodations, state and local government services and telecommunication Section 20 Section Headings All section headings are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect any construction or interpretation of this Agreement Section 21 Se%erability If any covenant or provision of this Agreement shall be adjudged void, such adjudication shall not affect the validity or obligation of performance of any other covenant or provision, or part thereof, that in itself is valid if such remainder conforms to the terms and requirements of applicable I aw and t he i ntent o f t his A greement, N o controversy concerning any covenant o r provision shall delay the performance of any other covenant or provision except as herem allowed Page 6 GCA3655 56 Section 22 EXeentiOn and Acceptance This Agreement may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original having identical legal effect The Contractor does hereby ratify and adopt all statements, representations,warranties, covenants, and agreements and their supporting materials contained and/or mentioned herein, and does hereby accept State funds and agrees to all of the terms and conditions thereof. Section 23 Execution This Agreement is executed by the Director of the Public Transportation and Rail Division, State of W ashmgton,D epartment o f T ransportation a r t he D irector's d esignee, n of a s an i ndividual incurring personal obligation and liability, but solely by, for, and on behalf of the State of Washington, Department of Transportation, in his/her capacity as Director of the Public Transportation and Rail Division IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written STATE OF WASHINGTON CONTRACTOR DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By. By Judith Giniger, Director Print Name. Public Transportation and Rail Division Title: Who certifies proper authority to execute this agreement on behalf of The Contractor Date: Date- Approved as to form by Jeanne A Cushman Assistant Attorney General Counsel to WSDOT Date July 30, 2003 I Page 7 CCA3655 57 Exhibit I Funding Allocation Methodology Funding allocated by WSDOT for local implementation of CTR activities is based on the following formula: i Each county is provided $1,200 per affected worksite as a base allocation to ensure sufficient funding to meet Jurisdiction obligations pursuant to RCW 70 94 521-55 L The number of affected worksites in each county shall be based on information contained in W SDOT database as of May 1 of each year 2 The remaining funding will be allocated based on the number of commute trips reduced per day in each county between each worksite's base year survey and its most recent survey,provided that every county receives at least$80,000 per year. For the period July 1, 2003 through June 30, 2004,the most recent survey period will be 2001, For the period July 1,2004 through June 30, 2005,the most recent survey penod will be 2003 i July 1,2003-June 30,2004 Allocation i Additional EDa Worksite to Achieve Number Base Performance $80,00 Total j Count of SitesAllocation Allocation Floor Allocation Benton $50,00Clark 47 $56,40 $20,26 $3.33 $8000King 552 , 1 $662,40 $280,270 $942,67 Kitsap 32 0 $38,4 $ $41,60 $80,000 0 Pierce 83 4,278 $99,60 $103,585 $203,185 Snohomish 84 1,050 $100,80 $25,424 $126,22 Spokane 99 2,255 $118,80 $54,601 $173,401 Thurston 65 579 $78,0 $14,020 $92,02 Whatcom 23 329 S27,60Q $10,195 $42,205 $80,00 Yakima 20 304 $24,00 $9,42 $46,58 $80,00 TOTAL 1005 21,024 IS1,206,000 S517,7811 $133,7191 $1,907,500.0 Any distnbution of funds to Junsdictions within a county shall be done on the basis of the number of affected worksttes in each Jurisdiction For example, if there are two Jurisdictions in a county, each with fifty percent of the total number of affected worksttes in the county,any division of funds within the county should provide each of the two jurisdictions with fifty percent of the total county funding allocation. Page 8 CCA3655 i 58 EXHIBIT II SCOPE OF WORK Implementation of Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Plans and Program CONTRACTORTASKS 1. General Administration The Contractor will administer a Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) ordinance and implement a CTR program for major employers as required by RCW 70 94 521 et seq. 2. Funding Distribution and Reporting The Contractor may distribute funds to affected jurisdictions, or their designees, within the county implementing CTR plans and ordinances as required by RCW 70 94 544 by entering into agreement as appropriate with other jurisdictions, local transit agencies, regional transportation planning organizations, or other organizations The Contractor shall submit to WSDOT a list of dollar amounts to be disbursed by the Contractor to local jurisdiction(s) local transit agencies, regional transportation planning organizations, or independent contractors, or a fund dispersion methodology within thirty (30) days of approval of any agreements between the Contractor and other parties 3. Implementation Plans The Contractor, the affected jurisdictions, or its designee, shall implement all of the provisions listed below The Contractor shall include all o ft hese provisions in i nteriocal agreements with other junsdictions, local transit agencies, regional transportation planning organizations, or other organizations, as necessary, to coordinate the development, implementation, and administration of CTR plans and ordinances I 3.1 Appeals, Exemptions, and Modifications Maintain an appeals process. This process must be consistent with RCW 70.94 534(6) and procedures contained in the Commute Trip Reduction Task Force Guidelines The Contractor, or their designees,will submit requests for exemptions or modifications, including requests for goal modifications, to WSDOT for review and comment within five(5)days of receiving such requests,and shall allow WSDOT five(5)working days to provide comments prior to approving or denying the request 3.2 Survey Processing Notify WSDOT pnor to sending any surveys to the University of Washington, Office of Educational Assessment for processing. The notification must include the name of the worksite, employer identification code, and type of survey for each survey being submitted for processing The notification shall be submitted as an electronic spreadsheet via electronic mail The Contractor agrees to wait for confirmation from WSDOT prior to sending or delivering the surveys for processing Page 9 GCA3655 59 3.3 Database Updates Provide WSDOT with updated lists of affected worksdes and jurisdiction contacts on a quarterly basis. These updates will be submitted electronically in a format specified by WSDOT 3.4 Employer Annual Reports Within 30 days from the date of approval, submit to WSDOT one electronic or hard copy of any approved employer annual reports 3.5 Employer Exemptions and Goal Modifications Within 30 days from the date of approval, submit to WSDOT the name and employer identification code for any workstte that has been granted an exemption or goal modification. Include information about the duration of all exemptions and tnfonnatmon on the type of goal modification granted 3.6 Progress Report and Invoice Submit to WSDOT periodic progress reports, as detailed in Exhibit 111, along with any invoice or request for reimbursement. WSDOT TASKS 1. General Technical Assistance WSDOT will provide 'support to the Contractor, or their designees, in developing and implementing CTR plans and programs, including providing training, informational matenals, and assistance in CTR evaluation WSDOT will also assist with overall CTR marketing and promotion on a statewide basis 2. Exemptions and Modifications WSDOT will review and comment on employer requests for waivers and modifications, including requests for goal modifications, within five (5) working days. Failure to review and comment on such requests within five(5) working days shall be considered a forfeiture of the right to comment on the request 3. Database Nlanagement WSDOT will maintain a current database of all affected worksmtes to Washington Slate. WSDOT will input new and/or updated worksrte information within fifteen (15) working days of receipt from local junsdictions. WSDOT will employ an internal verification process to ensure all new and/or updated information is input in a timely and accurate manner. Information from the WSDOT database will be used to determine funding allocation consistent with the methodology contained in Exhibit 1,Funding Allocation Methodology 4. Training WSDOT will develop and maintain employer and jurisdictions training materials to support local implementation of the CTR program Page 10 GCA3655 i 60 5. Public Airareness WSDOT will develop and implement statewide public awareness and recognition programs to support local implementation of the CTR program in affected jurisdictions 6. Annual Reporting Assistance WSDOT will distribute in sufficient quantities the State"Program Description &Employer Annual Report" form to the Contractor,affected jurisdiction,or its designee, as requested WSDOT will also maintain an mtemet-based annual report system, and will provide information and ongoing technical assistance to employers and junsdictions using the system 7. Survey Assistance WSDOTwill- 7A Provide the Contractor,or their designees,with summary survey information as requested 7.2 Distribute the Employee Questionnaires in sufficient numbers to the Contractor,or its designees, as requested 7.3 Maintain an internet-based survey tool, and provide information and ongoing technical assistance to employers and jurisdictions using the system 7.4 Provide survey processing at no cost to the Contractor, or their designees, and affected employers, during the base year and all subsequent surveys required by the Contractor 7.5 Provide technical assistance to the Contractor, or their designees, and employers,on surveying, as requested 7.6 Work with the Contractor, or their designees, to calculate goal measurement information and track measurement survey history for all CTR affected worksites 7.7 Return the processed Employee Questionnaires and survey reports to the Contractor, or their designees, within thirty(30)days of the date the forms are delivered for processing 7.8 Maintain and periodically update the "CTR Guide for Employer Surveys "WSDOT will review survey guide/instructional materials developed by the Contractor or its designees for consistency with the state-developed"CTR Guide for Employer Surveys" 7.9 Review all electronically submitted survey notifications and respond to the Contractor within five (5) working days i i I Page 11 GCA3655 i 61 I it Exhibit III Progress Report Format ® Name of the Organization Submitting Report • Submitted on behalf of following Junsdictron(s) • Contact Name• • Contact Phone and Fax Number Contact E-mail: 1. CTR Activities A brief summary of activities undertaken during the period for which reimbursement is requested. 2. State CTR Funds Disbursed Disbursed Total Disbursed Jurisdiction Since Last Report Fiscal Year to Date Jurisdiction A $ $ Jurisdiction B $ S (etc) Total Disbursement $ Page 12 CCA3655 62 3. Expenditures This Period List actual total expenditures on the last line of the following table Estimate expenditures by category as indicated. Local Fiscal Year Other Fiscal Year Funds to Date Funds to Date State CTR Fiscal Year Spent on Local Spent on Other Funds To Date CTR Funds CTR Funds Spent State CTR Activities Spenton Activities Spent on Since Last Funds Since Last CTR Since Last CTR Categories Re Dort Sent Report Activities. Report Activities Required Activities, $ $ S $ $ $ including: 1 Notification of New Worksites 2 Administering CTR Surveys 3 Employer Annual Report Review 4 Exemptions and Modifications 5 Record Maintenance 6 Enforcement Employer Seri ice Acth ities Employer Training $ $ $ $ $ $ Incentives $ $ $ S $ S j Promotion and S $ S Marketing Guaranteed Ride $ $ $ $ $ $: Home Other(Specify) S s $ $ $ $ Totals s is 4. Jurisdiction(s)Contact Names,Address,and Phone Numbers Jurisdiction A John Who City ofX PO Box 1234 X, WA 98000 Phone (206)999-9999 5. List of contact information for affected workskes in the Jurisdiction. The information will be submitted in the electronic format approved by WSDOT 6. Employer Annual Reports Approved During This Period Provide the name and worksite identification number for all employer annual reports approved i during this period Attach a hard copy or electronic (disc) copy of any employer annual reports approved by the Jurisdiction during the quarter If the jurisdiction approved employer annual reports submitted via WSDOT's web-based reporting system, indicate the name and worksite identification number for each worksite report approved i i Page 13 CCA3655 i I I I, 63 7. Emplo)er Exemptions and Goal Modifications Granted Duren;This Period Provide the name and worksite identification number for any workstte that has been granted an exemption or goal modification during this period Include information about the duration of all exemptions and information on the type of goal modification granted i l I i Page 14 CCA3655 l 64 This page intentionally left blank. i i 65 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Don E. Wickstrom, P.E. Public Works Director Phone:263-856-5500 { U� Fax: 253-856-6500 E KE` Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. WASH.INGTON Kent,WA.98032-5895 DATE: August 18,2003 TO: Mayor White and Kent City Council FROM: Don Wickstrom, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Six-Year Transportation Improvement Plan, 2004-2009 MOTION: Recommend Council set a Public Hearing on September 16, 2003 for the adoption of the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Plan for the period 2004-2009. SUMMARY: The 2004-2009 Six Year TIP includes 29 projects,with estimated project costs totaling$175,646,000. BUDGET IMPACT: As itemized in attached Project Descriptions No Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personnel Impact BACKGROUND: Deleted from the 2003-2008 TIP COMPLETED OR IN-PROGRESS 132nd Ave SE Widening 248`h Street Improvements James Street at Central Intersection Improvement 132°d Ave SE at Kent Kangley Road Intersection Improvement South 277 h Street Corridor,Phase 2 DELAYED FOR FUTURE FUNDING South 212E Street Railroad Grade Separation Added to 2004-2009 TIP Second Ave North and West Smith Street Intersection Improvement Central Avenue North and Pioneer Street Intersection Improvement Central Avenue and Burlington Northern Railroad Crossings Intertie(5 intersections) Changed S 228`h Railroad Grade Separation split into two distinct projects. One for each RR. Willis Street Railroad Grade Separation split into two distinct projects. One for each RlZ. S 277a' Street Corridor Extension was previously called the 116d' Ave SE Street Widening Project. Mayor White and Kent City Council 8/•14/2003 1 67 NT CITY OF KE , WASHINGTON SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2004 - 2009 W A S H I N G T O N Mayor Jim White Don E. Wickstrom, P.E. Director of Public Works 68 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Project Name Number Project Location and Extent Page 1 Pacific Highway South (SR 99) HOV Lanes—North Phase 1 South 252"d Street to Kent-Des Moines Road(SR 516) i 2 Pacific Highway South(SR 99) IIOV Lanes—South Phase 2 South 272id Street to South 252"d Street 3. Kent Station Infrastructure Improvements 3 Vicinity of 4th Avenue North and Ramsay Way 4 41h Avenue North and West Smith Street 4 Intersection Improvement S Second Avenue North and West Smith Street 5 Intersection improvements 6. Central Avenue North and Pioneer Street 6 Intersection improvements and widening of Pioneer Street 7 Military Road South at Reith Road 7 Intersection Improvement S. South 228mh Street Corridor Project- Phase I 8 Military Road South to 54'4 Avenue South 9 Central Avenue/Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad 9 Grade Crossings Signals Intertie Interconnection of intersection traffic signals along Central Avenue With BNSFRR grade-crossing signals i 10 South 2281h Street Extension/Burlington Northern Santa Fe 10 Railroad Grade Separation Project Grade separation crossing at Burlington Northern Santa Fe RR I 11. South 228ih Street Extension/Union Pacific Railroad Grade 11 Separation Project Grade Separation Crossings at Union Pacific Railroad t i 69 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Project Name Number Project Location and Extent Paee 12. Interurban Trail Crossings Signal Interconnect with West Meeker 12 Street and West Smith Street Signal Systems 13 South 2121h Street Pavement Rehabilitation Project 13 Green River Bridge to West Valley Highway (SR 181) 14 84"'Avenue South Pavement Rehabilitation Project 14 SR 167 to South 212"'Street 15. 72"d Avenue South Extension 15 South 100h Street to South 19e Street 16. South 277'h Street Corridor Extension 16 116'h Ave Southeast Widening Kent-Kangley Road(SR 516)to Southeast 2564 Street 17. Central Avenue South Pavement Rehabilitation 17 Green River Bridge to East Willis Street (SR 516) 18. Military Road South Widening- Phase I 18 Reith Road to Kent-Des Moines Road(SR 516) 19 Willis Street (SR516)/Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation 19 Project Grade Separation Crossing at Union Pacific Railroad 20 Willis Street(SR 516)/Burlington Northern Santa Fe 20 Railroad Grade Separation Project Grade Separation Crossing at Bw hngton Norihern/Santa Fe Railroad 21. 80th Avenue South Widening 21 South 196th Street to South 1881h Street 22, South 272"d Street Widening-Phase I 22 26'h Avenue South to Military Road South 23 South 272"d Street Widening-Phase II 23 ''Pacific Highway South (SR 99) to 26Avenue South n 70 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Project Name Number Project Location and Extent Page 24 South 272"d Street Widening-Phase III 24 Pacific Highway South to Military Road South and 1-5 HOV Loop-Ramp 25, South 228'h Street Corridor Project-Phase III 25 84"'Avenue South to 1 d8'h Avenue Southeast(Benson Road) (SR 515) 26 Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements 26 Ongoing Citywide Program 27 Guardrail and Safety Improvements 27 Ongoing Citywide Program 28 Americans with Disabilities Act Compliance Sidewalk 28 Repair and Rehabilitation Ongoing Citywide Program 29 Commuter/Shopper Shuttle Bus Project 29 Ongoing Citywide Program 30 MAP OF THE PROJECTS 30 I I i fit i I 71 i CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004 PROJECT: Pacific Hi iliway South (SR 99)HOV Lanes—North Phase South 252" Street to Kent-Des Moines Road(SR 516) DESCRIPTION: Widen Pacific Highway South to provide a pair ofHOV (High Occupancy Vehicle) lanes from South 252"d Street to the Kent-Des Moines Road (SR 516). The project will also provide a seven foot wide concrete sidewalk and modify existing traffic signal systems at South 240'h Street, and at South 252"d Street The project will include construction of full width paving, concrete curbs and gutters, landscaping; storm drainage, utilities; and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering . .. . $1,200,000 Right of Way Acquisition . $530,000 Construction $6,720,000 TOTAL........................................$8,450,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): STP,TIB,TIA,City of Kent, WSDOT Funded PROJECT i JUSTIFICATION: This project will reduce peak hour single-occupant vehicle trips by encouraging high occupancy vehicle usage Pacific Highway South (SR 99) is a regionally significant north-south arterial heavily used by commuters for access from South King County to the employment centers in South Seattle, and provides alternative access to 1-5 and Sea- Tac airport AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ—Congestion Miligabon and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action Strategy for EverettSeattle-Tacoma Condor,FMS18—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal Transit Administration[Federal],LIES—Ha2ard Ehmmation[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID-- Local improvement District,PIYTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[Slate], STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Pr017am[State] 1 72 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004 PROJECT: Pacific Highway South (SR 99) HOV Lanes—South Phase South 272" Street to South 252"d Street DESCRIPTION: Widen Pacific Highway South to provide a pair of HOV (High Occupancy Vehicle) lanes from South 272a4 Street to South 252"d Street The project will also provide a seven foot wide concrete sidewalk, and modify existing traffic signals at the FTed Meyer Shopping Center, South 260h Street, and South 272ad Street. The project will include construction of full width paving, concrete curbs and gutters; landscaping; storm drainage; utilities; and appurtenances PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering . . $900,000 Right of Way Acquisition $1,600,000 i Construction $6,100,000 TOTAL........................................$8,600,000 i FUNDING SOURCE (S): STP,TIB, A1P,TPP, City of Kent, WSDOT Funds Funded PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The project will reduce peak hour single-occupant vehicle trips by encouraging high occupancy vehicle usage Pacific Highway South (SR 99) is a regionally significant north-south arterial heavily used by commuters for access from South King County to the employment centers in South Seattle, and provides additional access to I-5 and Sea- Tac Airport AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality(Federal],FAST-Freight Action Strategy for Evcretl-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMRIB-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA-Federal Transit Administration[Federal],HCS-Hazard Elimination[Federal],M-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID- Local Improvement District,PPYTF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA-Transportation Improvement Account,71B-Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 2 73 I CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM j YEAR: 2004 PROJECT: Kent Station Infrastructure Improvements Vicinity of 4"'Avenue North and Ramsay Way DESCRIPTION: Widen 2nd Avenue North to provide two travel lanes with left turn pockets at intersections, and on-street parking between West Smith Street and West Temperance Street. Construct the north half of West Temperance Street between 2nd Avenue North and 1st Avenue North Construct Ramsay Way from West Temperance Street to 4th Avenue North and install a traffic signal at 4th Avenue North and Ramsay Way. Widen 1st Avenue North to three lanes from West Temperance Street to West James Street The project will include full width paving; concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, landscaping; storm drainage; utilities, and appurtenances, PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering .. .. $390,000 Right of Way Acquisition 0 Construction . . $1,930,000 TOTAL........................................$2,320,000 1 FUNDING SOURCE(S): CMAQ, City of Kent Funded PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project provides the necessary transportation infrastructure for development of Kent Station and adjacent properties The project is coordinated with transit and commuter rail improvements in and around the vicinity of Kent Station and the Kent Transit Center sites The project includes street improvements required for the development of the site, as well as mitigation measures(traffic signal) to accommodate access to the City arterial street system AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST-Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB- Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA-Federal Transit Administration[Federal],IfES-Hazard Elimination[Federal],]TS-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID- , Local ImprovemantDislnct,PWTF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],.STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA-Transportation Improvement Account,TIB-Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 3 74 i I CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004 PROJECT: 4t1i Avenue North and West Smith Street Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvement DESCRIPTION: Reconstruct the 4th Avenue North and West Smith Street intersection by widening each approach to add a left turn pocket with appropriate left turn storage and upgrade the traffic signal. This project will include construction of full width paving; concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; landscaping, storm drainage,utilities, and appurtenances PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering . . . . .... $185,000 Right of Way Acquisition .$140,000 Construction $635,000 TOTAL...........................................$960,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): FTA, City of Kent,ITS Funded PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The intersection currently has four lanes on each approach Volumes are such that it is necessary to operate the signal to serve only one approach at a time This project widens each approach to provide for a separate left turn pocket with appropriate storage This allows a much more efficient operation of the signal at this intersection, and significantly enhances the traffic signal progression along both of these heavily traveled arterial corridors This project also improves traffic operations and provides arterial capacity for urban revitalization and serves as a key transit comdor. i A1P-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CM.fQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],EAST-Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FM.SIB-Freight Mobility Stralegic Imesiment Board[State],FT.9-Federal Transit Administration[Federal],MES-Hazard Ehmmatiori[Federal],17S-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID- Local Improvement Distnct,PWTF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal], T!A-Transportation Improvement Account,TIB-Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 4 75 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. YEAR: 2004 I PROJECT: Second Avenue North and West Smith Street DESCRIPTION: Minor widening on West Smith Street to provide separate left turn lanes, traffic signalization, traffic signal interconnect, and an mtertte to the Burlington Nortbem/Santa Fe Railroad grade crossing signal PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering. $200,000 Right of Way Acquisition $0 Construction $800,000 I TOTAL........................................$1,000,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): City of Kent, ITS PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The signal provides access to/from the Kent Transit Station which includes the bus center plus connections to each of the commuter rail platforms and the downtown Park & Ride parking structure This intersection also provides the principal pedestrian connection between the historic downtown area, the Kent Transit Station, and the planned Transit Oriented Development(TOD)referred to as Kent Station I i AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST-Freight Action Strategy for Everen-Sealtle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA-Federal Transit Administration[Federal],HES-Hazard Elimination[Federal],IT3-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID— LocallmprovementDistrict,PWTF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal], ! TIA-Transportation Improvement Account,TIB-Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 5 76 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004 PROJECT: Central Avenue North/Pioneer Street Intersection improvement and widening of Pioneer Street DESCRIPTION: Widening of Central Avenue North and Pioneer Street intersection, widening of Pioneer Street, and ttaflic signal improvements PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering $100,000 Right of Way Acquisition . . . . $0 Construction . $336,000 TOTAL...........................................$436,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, ITS PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Improvements to the comer radii and widening of Pioneer Street will enhance t ransit access to the Kent Transit Center. The signal upgrade includes traffic signal interconnect to the traffic signal system. This project is crucial to providing adequate access for the regional transit services to maneuver their buses into the Kent Transit Center and circulate through the Transit Center with minimal conflict from pedestrian or vehicle traffic AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],PAST-Freight Action Strategyfor Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],PTA-Federal Transit Administration[Federal],HES-Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID- Local l mprovemeot District,PWTF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA-Transportation improvement Account,TIB-Transponahon improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 6 77 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004 PROJECT: Military Road South at Reith Road Intersection Improvement DESCRIPTION: Widen all approaches of Military Road South at Reith Road intersection to provide exclusive left turn lanes for each approach, and exclusive right turn lanes for northbound and southbound traffic on Military Road South and westbound traffic on Reith Road Modify the existing traffic signal The project will include the construction of full width paving, paved shoulders, street lighting, storm drainage, utilities and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineenng. $100,000 Right of Way Acquisition $50,000 Construction . $900,000 TOTAL........................................$1,050,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): AIP, City of Kent, STP Partially Funded PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The level of development on the Kent West Hill,coupled with the growth in the Puget Sound area and the regularly occumng congestion along both Pacific Highway South and Interstate 5 results in significant congestion at this intersection in the morning and evening peak hours AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CAtAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Fedcul],FAST-Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSI8-Freight Mobility Strategic investment Board[State],FTA-Federal Transit Administration[Federal],ILES-Hazard Elimination [Federal],ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Pcdcral],LID- Local Improvement District,PWTF-Public Works Trust Fund loan[State],M-Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA-Transportation improvement Account,TIB-Transportation improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 78 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004 PROJECT: South 228th Street Corridor- Phase I Military Road South to 54rh Avenue South DESCRIPTION. Preliminary engineering and construction of a new five-lane roadway from SR-516 along Military Road South to approximately Bolger Road, then from Military Road South to 54th Avenue South, including a new bridge over the Green River. The project will include the construction of full- width paving; a bridge, concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks and/or paved shoulders; street lighting, storm drainage, landscaping, utilities and appurtenances. The project may include the installation of traffic signals at the Corridor's intersections with Military Road South and Lakeside Boulevard. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering. $4,800,000 Right of Way Acquisition $1,800,000 Construction .. S20,400,000 TOTAL......................................$27,000,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): TPP, City of Kent, LID, TIB,FMSIB, PWTF I PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: James Street and Meeker Street `corridors' are not feasible to widen sufficiently to accommodate forecast traffic volumes and future . development West Meeker Street currently represents the only east-west arterial that crosses the Green River between SR 516 and South 212th Street This project will provide required east-west capacity AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action ',... Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal '.. Transit Administration[Federal],HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID— Local Improvement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 8 79 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ' YEAR: 2004 PROJECT: Central Avenue and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Grade Crossings Signals Intertie DESCRIPTION: hnprovements to the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad grade i crossing signals Includes installation of detector loops near the grade crossing and the interne cable in underground conduit between the railroad grade signal and the corresponding traffic signal on Central Avenue at five arterials(East James Street, East Smith Street, E ast Meeker Street, East ! Gowe Street, and East Willis Street). I I PROJECT COST: Prchnunary Engineering.. . $20,000 Right of Way Acquisition — ..30 Construction $120,000 TOTAL...........................................$140,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): City of Kent,ITS PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: These improvements to the railroad grade crossing signals enhance the safety of the arterial street crossings of the Burlington Northern(Santa Fe Railroad, a requirement of the Washington Utilities and Trade Commission (WUTC) to allow increased train operating speeds for passenger and freight rail The increase in operating speed (with appropriate safety, upgrades) is essential to increasing the number of trains through the region,improving mobility and capacity for freight rail and passenger rail. Central Avenue is a Principal Arterial street, roughly parallel to the BNSFRR and approximately 480 feet easterly of the centerline of the BNSFRR tracks AIP.Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FM.SIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal '.... Transit Administration[Federal],IIES—Hazard Ehm nation[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID— Local Improvement District,P WTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],,S7P—Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,77B—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 9 ao CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004 PROJECT: South 228th Street/Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Grade Separation Project Grade Separation crossing at Burlington Northern/Santa Fe Railroad DESCRIPTION: Construct grade separation of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad mamlme tracks at South 228'h Street. The project will include the construction of a railroad bridge, road underpass, full-width paving, concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, street lighting, utilities and appurtenances PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering. $2,250,000 Right of Way Acquisition $1,000,000 Construction ... . . .$13,750,000 TOTAL.................... .................$17,000,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent,TIB,PWTF loan,FAST, FMSIB, Burlington Northem/Santa Fe Railroad PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The project will lead to a seamless connection between major freight handlers and their primary destinations This project will support freight moving through Kent to the Ports of Seattle and Tacoma, Sea-Tac Airport and the freeway system Grade separating the arterial will increase both rail and roadway capacity, decrease congestion, enhance safety, and improve freight mobility in this corridor and throughout the region This project will provide regional connections between thousands of businesses, employers, and 40 million square feet of warehouse/industnal space The level of freight and passenger rail traffic on the BNSF Railroad mainline is rising as a consequence of increased traffic in the Puget Sound area, and new Sound Transit and Amtrak service AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Imestment Board[State],PTA—Federal Transit Administration[Federal],HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],lTS—intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID— Local improvement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State) 10 i 81 ' I CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004 PROJECT: South 228th Street/Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation Project Grade Separation crossing at Union Pacific Railroad ! DESCRIPTION: Construct grade separation of the Union Pacific Railroad mainline tracks at South 228ih Street The project will include the construction of a railroad bridge structure, a bicycle and pedestrian bridge, and a road underpass; full-width paving; concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks; street lighting, utilities and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engmeenng.. . . . . $3,000,000 Right of Way Acquisition .. . .$1,000,000 Construction $17,000,000 TOTAL......................................$21,000,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): City of Kent, TIB, PWTF loan, FAST, F.MSIB, Union Pacific Railroad PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The project will lead to a seamless connection between major freight handlers and their primary destinations This project will support freight moving through Kent to the Ports of Seattle and Tacoma, Sea-Tac Airport and the freeway system. Grade separating this arterial will increase both rail and roadway capacity, decrease congestion, enhance safety, improve freight mobility in this corridor and throughout the region. This project will provide regional connections for thousands of businesses,employers, and the 40 million square feet of warehouse/industnal space in the valley AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Scattle-Tacoma Corridor,FM.SIB—Freight Mobility Strategic investment Board[State],FTA—Federal Transit Administration[Federal],RES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID— Local Improvement District,PWTF—Public works 9Yust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,T/B—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 11 82 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM i YEAR: 2004 PROJECT: Interurban Trail Crossings Signal Interconnect West Meeker Street and West Smith Street DESCRIPTION: Interconnect the existing traffic signals at the Interurban Trail crossings at West Meeker Street and West Smith Street to the Union Pacific crossing signals at said streets PROJECT COST: Preliminary.Engineenng. . . $30,000 Construction . . .. .. .. .$240,000 Right of Way Acquisition $ 0- TOTAL...........................................$270,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): STP, City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project is required in order to interconnect the existing street signals with the railroad crossing signals It will eliminate potential conflict where traffic could backup across the railroad tracks I AIP,Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],IAST-Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA-Federal Transit Administration[Federal],HES-Hazard Elimination[Fedora]],ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID- Local Improvement District,PWT F-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA-Transportation Improvement Account,TIB-Transportation Improvement Board[Slate],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 12 83 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR; 2004 I PROJECT: South 212"'Street Pavement Rehabilitation Green River Bridge to West Valley Highway(SR 181) DESCRIPTION: Remove and rehabilitate the existing roadway pavement to add additional service]ife t o t he a sphalt r oadway b etween t he G reen River bridge a nd West Valley Highway(SR 181).This project will include the removal and replacement of the upper two inches of the existing asphalt pavement in the curb lanes in both directions, and a full-width asphalt pavement overlay of the entire roadway This project will also include the selective replacement of catch basin inlets and driveway approach aprons, and sections of concrete curbs and gutters PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering. . . $45,000 Right of Way Acquisition .. $-0- Construction . .. . . . ..... .. .$635,000 TOTAL...........................................$680,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): STP, City of Kent Funded PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The existing asphalt pavement along this section of South 212s Street is exhibiting signs of distress, as demonstrated by "alhgatonng", longitudinal cracking, and cracking of the concrete curbs and gutters The end of the service life of this roadway has been reached Reconstruction of the pavement to extend the service life of the roadway and prevent further degradation is required AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[Stale],CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal Transit Administration[Fcderal],ILLS—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID— Local Improvement District,PW7'F—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[Slate],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[Slate] 13 84 CITY OF KEN T � SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM i YEAR: 2004 PROJECT: 84th Avenue South Pavement Rehabilitation SR 167 to South 212" Street DESCRIPTION: Remove and rehabilitate the existing roadway pavement to add additional service life to the roadway between SR 167 and South 2121h Street This project will include the removal and replacement of the existing pavement in the curb lanes in both directions, and a full-width asphalt concrete overlay of the entire roadway, and will also include the selective replacement of catch basin inlets and driveway approach aprons, curbs and gutters PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering .. $145,000 Right of Way Acquisition . . $-0- Construction . $585,000 TOTAL...........................................$730,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): STP,City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The existing pavement along this section of 84'h Avenue South is showing signs of structural distress as demonstrated by "alligatormg", longitudinal cracking, and cracking of the curbs and gutters An inverted crown section also occurs at the former curb line along many of the sections of this street:This inverted crown section results in the pending of stormwater in the street along the seam line, which increases the failure rate of the roadway pavement e11P-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FGST-Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB-Freiglit Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],PTA-Federal Transit Administration[Federal],HGS-Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID- Local improvementDrstnct,PWTF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA-Transportation Improvement Account,TIB-Transportation improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] - 14 85 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2005 i PROJECT: 72ad Avenue South Extension South 200t6 Street to South 190h Street DESCRIPTION: Construct a new four-lane roadway from South 200`h Street to South 196th Street. The project will include the crossing of Mill Creek and construction of full-width paving, concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, street lighting, storm drainage;landscaping; utilities and appurtenances PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering. $160,000 Right of Way Acquisition $680,000 Construction $580,000 TOTAL........................................$1,420,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Continued development in the northern Kent industrial area, and high levels of congestion along West Valley Highway between the South 130th Street and South 196th Street corridors, mandate additional north-south arterial capacity. This project provides some relief for South He Street, South 196th Street, and South 212ih Street intersections along West Valley Highway It also provides improved access to the South 196th Street corridor from Industrial development along 72"d Avenue South AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ—Congestion M jtigatton and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action Strategy for Evereti-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMS119—Freight Mobility Strategic investment Board[State],FTA—Federal Transit Administration[Federal],IJES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID— LocallmprorenientDistrict,PWTF-Pub]is Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TID—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 15 86 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM i I YEAR: 2005 PROJECT: South 277" Street Corridor Extension Widen I i&Avenue Southeast from Kent-Kaugley Road(SR 516)to Southeast 256th Street DESCRIPTION: Widen, 116th Avenue Southeast to provide a five-lane roadway, including four general-purpose travel lanes, a two-way left turn lane and a bicycle facility. Also included in this project will be the widening of the intersection of Kent Kangley Road and 116* Avenue Southeast to add an additional left turn lane to provide dual left turn lanes westbound on Kent- Kangley Road to southbound 116th Avenue Southeast The project will include the construction of paving; concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks; bicycle lanes;paved shoulders; street lighting; storm drainage, utilities and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering. .. ..$300,000 Right of Way Acquisition. ..... .$210,000 Construction $1,450,000 TOTAL........................................$1,960,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): TIB, City of Kent, LID PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project extends the South 2771h Street Corridor northward to Southeast 256'h Street. Traffic studies have indicated that traffic demand will continue to increase on this section of 116'h Avenue This roadway facilitates traffic from Southeast 256" Street to the 272nd/277th Street Corridor AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[Stale],CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FAISIB—Freight Mobility Strategic investment Board[Stale],FTA—Federal Transit Administrabon [Federal],RES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID— Local Improvement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation Improvement Account, TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] _ 16 87 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2005 PROJECT: Central Avenue South Pavement Rehabilitation Green River Bridge to East Willis Street(SR 516) DESCRIPTION: Remove and rehabilitate the existing roadway pavement to add additional service life to the roadway, between the Green River Bridge and East Willis Street (SR 516. This project will include the removal and replacement of the upper two inches of the existing pavement in the curb lanes in both directions, and a full-width asphalt concrete overlay of the entire roadway, and will also include the selective replacement of catch basin inlets, and driveway approach aprons,as well as curbs and gutters PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering. $50,000 Right of Way Acquisition ... $0 Construction . ... $550,000 TOTAL...........................................$600,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): STP, City of Kent I PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The existing paving along this section of Central Avenue South is exhibiting signs of distress, as demonstrated by"alligatonng", longitudinal cracking, and cracking of the c urbs a nd gutters. The service life o f this roadway has been reached, necessitating reconstruction of the pavement to extend the service life of the roadway, and prevent further pavement degradation AIP-Artenal Improvement Program[State],CMAQ—Congestmn Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Condor,FM.SIB—Freight Mobility Stralegm investment Board[State],FTA—Federal Transit Administration[Federal],ILLS—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID— Local Improvement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund loan[Stale],.STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal], 77A—Transportation Improvement Account,77B—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 17 88 i i CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2006 i PROJECT: Military Road South Widenim-Phase I 38th Avenue South to South 248 Street I� I DESCRIPTION: Widen and re-channellze Military Road South to provide an interim three- lane roadway, including two general-purpose travel Ianes, and a two-way left turn lane. The project will include the construction of full width paving, street channehzation, street lighting,utilities and appurtenances I i PROJECT COST: . Preliminary Engineering ., .$55,000 Right of Way Acquisition .. . . . $-0- Construction $135,000 TOTAL...........................................$190,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The level of development along this section of Military Road South has reached the point where a three-lane roadway section is required to accommodate through traffic and provide safe left turn access into the commercial center southwest of the National Guard facility. i AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],1 AST—Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Scattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal Transit Administration[Federal],JJ.ES—Hazard Elimination[Fedcral],JTS—intclbgent Transportation Systems[Federal],L!D— '....... Local Improvement District,PtYrF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation improvement Account, FIB—Transportation improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 1$ 89 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2006 PROJECT: Willis Street (SR 516)/Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation Project Grade Separation Crossing at Union Pacific Railroad(UPRR) DESCRIPTION: Construct grade separation of the Union Pacific Railroad's mainline tracks at Willis Street (SR 516) The project will provide more efficient movement of goods and services and will relieve congestion due to train traffic on the UPRR of approximately 20 trains per day. This results in an accumulated delay of more than 32 minutes per day at this intersection alone The project will include the constriction of a railroad bridge, a roadway under crossing, full-width paving; concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, street lighting; utilities and appurtenances PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering ... $4,000,000 Right of Way Acquisition . . . .. . $0 Construction . .. $16,000,000 TOTAL......................................$20,000,000 i I FUNDING SOURCE (S): City of Kent,FAST,FMSIB,Union Pacific Railroad PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project supports east-west freight and commuter mobility in the Green River Valley. More than 27,000 vehicles per day travel on Willis Street, including over 800 freight-bearing trucks The level of freight traffic on the UP Railroad mainline is also increasing as a consequence of economic conditions in the Puget Sound area. Grade separations provide the solution to the costly problem of congestion. The RR crossing will no longer impede freight and other traffic flow Reductions in traffic congestion on adjoining streets and reduced environmental impacts caused by traffic congestion is also expected This project will enhance Kent as an economic generator and provide regional connections for thousands of businesses, employers,and commuters AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Au Quality[Federal],FAST-Freight Action 'I Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIa-Freight Mobility Strategic investment Board[State],FTA-Federal Transit Administration [Federal],11ES-Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID- Local Improvement District,Pff TF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA-Transportation Improvement Account,TIB-Transportation improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 19 i 90 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2006 PROJECT: Willis Street (SR 516)/Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Grade Separation Project Grade Separation Crossings at Burlington Northern/Santa Fe Railroad (BNSFRR) DESCRIPTION: Construct grade separation at the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad mainline tracks at Willis Street (SR 516) The project will provide more efficient movement of goods and services and will relieve congestion due to tram traffic on the BNSFRR of approximately 40 trams per day. This results in an accumulated delay of an hour each day at this intersection alone The project will include the construction of a railroad bridge; vehicle under crossing, full-width paving; concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, street lighting, utilities and appurtenances PROJECT COST. Preliminary Engineering . .. . . $3,000,000 i Right of Way Acquisition $3,000,000 Construction .. . . .. $11,000,000 TOTAL........................................17,000,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): City of Kent, FAST,FMSIB, Burlington Northern/Santa Fe Railroad PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project supports east-west freight and commuter mobility in the Green River Valley More than 27,000 vehicles per day travel on Willis Street, including over 800 freight-bearing trucks The level of freight and passenger rail traffic on the BNSF Railroad mainline is also increasing as a consequence of economic conditions in the Puget Sound area Grade separation provides the solution to the costly problem of congestion The railroad crossing will no longer impede freight and other traffic flow Reductions in traffic congestion on adjoining streets and reduced environmental impacts caused by traffic Congestion is also expected This project Will enhance Kent as an economic generator and provide regional connections for thousands of businesses,employers,and commuters RIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ—Congestion Maigation and Air Quality[Federal],/'AST-Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Imestment Board[State),FTA—Federal Transit Administration[Federal],IIE,S—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID— Local Improvement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 20 91 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2007 PROJECT: 801" Avenue South Widening South 196th Street to South 1881h Street i DESCRIPTION: Widen 80rb Avenue South from South 196th Street to South 188th Street to five lanes This will include four general-purpose lanes and a two-way j left turn lane The project will also include the construction of full-width paving; concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; street lighting; storm drainage; utilities and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering. .. $130,000 Right of Way Acquisition - .$285,000 Construction $515,000 TOTAL...........................................$930,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, LID PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The opening of the 196"' Street Corridor on the south end of the project and Renton's completion of Oaksdale Avenue South will result in 80t4 Avenue South being a significant north/south corridor serving the industrial area As a result,the increased traffic volumes along this section of 80tb Avenue South could reach the point where a consistent five-lane roadway section is required to provide safe left turn access into the adjoining properties Further, concrete curbs and gutters are required to provide c ontrol o f r oadway d rainage a rid t o p rcvent i inpacts t o a djacent property owners Sidewalks and street Jighting are to provide safe access for pedestrians. � AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quakily[Fedora]],FAST-Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FM,SIB-Freight Mobdily Stralcgic Imestment Board[State],PTA-Federal Transit Administration [Federal],HGS-Hazard Elimination(Federal],ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID- Local Improvement District,PWTF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; VA-Transportation Improvement Account,T18-Ttansportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 21 i 92 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: EAR: 2007 PROJECT: South 272nd Street Widening-Phase I 261h Avenue South to Military Road South DESCRIPTION: Widen the intersection of South 272nd Street and Military Road South to extend the existing left tutu pockets on the west and north approaches and also add an 1100 foot right turn lane on the north approach. The South 272nd Street I-5 undercrossmg will be excavated and the existing four lanes under the bridge widened to seven lanes. These lanes will include four general-purpose lanes, a two-way left turn lane, and two lanes held in reserve for Phase III of this project. This project will also include the construction of full width paving (including shoulders), drainage, utilities and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering. . . $1,100,000 Right of Way Acquisition .. . $900,000 Construction ... ... ....... $5,700,000 TOTALL........................................$7,700,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): STP, City of Kent, City of Federal Way, King County, Sound Transit, TPP PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The traffic volumes along this section of South 272nd Street have reached the point where additional lanes are required to reduce congestion. Additional lanes are also required under I-5 to reduce congestion The additional length of the right turn lane from Military Road South will help prevent extensive backups in the southbound lane The project will also relieve congestion near the northside Park acid Ride lot AIP-Artendl Improvement Program[State],C MAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action Strategy for Evercti-Sealtle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA-Federal Transit Administration[Federal],IICS—Hazard Elimination[Federal],In—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID— local Improvement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],.STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 22 93 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2007 PROJECT: South 272nd Street Widening- Phase II Pacific Highway South(SR 99) to 26"' Avenue South DESCRIPTION: Widen South 272nd Street to add one westbound left turn lane at the intersection of South 272nd Street and Pacific Highway South and left turn lanes at the South Star Lake Road intersection. If feasible, construction of curb, gutter, and sidewalks, street lighting, storm drainage facilities, utilities and appurtenances will be deferred until Phase III of the South 272nd Street Widening Project PROJECT COST: Prehmmary Engineering $100,000 Right of Way Acquisition. . .. . . .350,000 Construction .. .. $650,000 TOTAL...........................................$800,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): STP,City of Kent,TIB PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Traffic volumes along this section of South 272"d Street have reached the point where widening and additional turn lanes are required to reduce congestion at the intersections and prevent backups between Pacific Highway South and I-5. This project will coordinate with access to the site of a proposed southside Park and Ride lot and with City of Federal Way improvements west of Pacific Highway South. AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action '.. Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],PTA—Federal Transit Administration[Fedcral],IIES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],IDS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID— Local Improvement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program IState] 23 94 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2008 PROJECT: South 272nd Street Widening-Phase III Pacific Highway South to Military Road South and I-5 HOV Loop Ramp DESCRIPTION: Add two HOV Lanes from Pacific Highway South (SR 99) to Military Road South Ali HOV loop-ramp from eastbound South 272nd Street to northbound I-5 will also be constructed Construction will include full width paving, concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalks, street lighting; storm drainage, utilities, and appurtenances PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering $800,000 Right of Way Acquisition . $500,000 Construction... . . . .36,200,000 TOTAL........................................$7,500,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): STP, City of Kent,TIB PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Traffic volumes between Pacific Highway South and Military Road South have reached the point where improvements supporting HOV- added capacity are required to reduce congestion at the intersections and reduce backups approaching I-5 The HOV lanes will provide access to the northside Park and Ride lot and the site of a proposed southside Park and Ride lot. Adding HOV lanes and HOV access to I-5 supports various County and City of Federal Way transportation and transit improvement projects AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State], CMAQ-Congestion Mitigation and An Quality[Federal],FAST-Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA-Federal Transit Administration[Fedora]],HBS-Hazard Elimination[Fedcrall,lTS-lntelligcnt Transportatton Systems[Federal],LID- . Local Improvement District,PWTF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[Sote],.STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal], PIA-Transportation Improvement Account,TIB-Transportation Improvement Board[State],fPP—Transportation Partnership L..... Program[State] '... 24 95 i CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2008 PROJECT: South 228th Street Corridor-Phase III 841h Avenue South to 1041°Avenue Southeast(Benson Road) (SR 515) I DESCRIPTION: Construct a new three to five-lane roadway from 84'h Avenue South to 104th Avenue Southeast (Benson Highway) (SR 515), including a new bridge over SR 167, and modify the traffic signals at the intersection of South 224'h Street and 84d' Avenue South. The project will include the construction of full-width paving, concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, street lighting; storm drainage, bicycle lanes; landscaping; utilities and appurtenances i PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering $1,500,000 Right of Way Acquisition $4,800,000 Construction $18,700,000 TOTAL......................................$25,000,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): TPP,King County,City of Kent,LID PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Additional capacity is required to accommodate existing development in the East Hill area of the City The James Street and South 208'h/212"' Street `comdors' are infeasible to widen to accommodate forecast traffic volumes without additional east-west capacity, based upon existing development and topographic constraints I AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ—Congotron Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],CAST-Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal Transit Administration[Federal],RES--1 l azard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID— '.. Local Improvement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal], - TLA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 25 96 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004 -2009 PROJECT: Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Ongoing Citywide Program DESCRIPTION: Make miscellaneous Improvements to the City's Bicycle Route and Pedestrian systern Potential projects include m provements to 100'h Avenue Southeast north of South 240i1' Street; Southeast 248tb Street cast of 94th Avenue South, and 152ad Way Southeast north of Southeast 272rid Street, PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering $60,000 Right of Way Acquisition. .. S-0- Construction .. . $562,000 TOTAL...........................................$625,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): STP, City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project complies with the City'sCTR(Commute Trip Reduction) Ordinance and the City Comprehensive Plan This project helps to reduce peak hour single-occupant vehicle trips, encourage the use of non- motorized transportation modes, and provide safe routes for school-age pedestrians and cyclists AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[Slate],CMAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],PAST-Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,PM.SIB-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA-Federal Transit Administration[Federal];PIES-hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID- Local Improvement District,PWTP-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[Slate],STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA-Transportation improvement Account, T18-Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership '.. Program[State] 26 97 i CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004-2009 PROJECT: Guardrail and Safety Improvements Ongoing Citywide Program DESCRIPTION: Make miscellaneous guardrail Improvements each year to enhance motorist safety Candidate projects include Frager Road and 100th Avenue Southeast (near the 22600 block) Upgrade existing guardrail end- treatments as mandated by State and Federal regulations. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineenng:... $20,000 Right of Way Acquisition . $-0- Construction . $175,000 TOTAL...........................................$195,000 FUNDING SOURCE, (S): STP, HES,City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project is mandated by compliance with Federal and State regulations, and the requirement to eliminate potentially hazardous roadway conditions. AIP-Artcnal Improvement Program[State],CbfAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST-Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA-Federal '.. Transit Administration[Federal],LIES-Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID- Local Improvement District,P07F-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA-Transportation Improvement Account, TIB-Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 27 98 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004-2009 PROJECT: Americans with Disabilities Act Compliance Sidewalk Repair and Rehabilitation Ongoing Citywide Program DESCRIPTION: Reconstruct and repair existing sidewalks and pedestrian ramps, and install new hard-surfaced sidewalks to implement the requirements of the Federal Government's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) This project will include an inventory of the City's sidewalk/walkway facilities, and identification and correction of existing deficiencies This project will also include the construction of concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks; minor storm drainage; and appurtenances PROJECT COST: Prelimmary Engineering. ..... $200,000 Right of Way Acquisition .... $-0 Construction . . . $1,750,000 TOTAL........................................$1,950,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project is mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). It repairs existing sidewalks, replaces deficient/substandard and/or missing wheelchair/pedestrian ramps, and brings same into compliance with the adopted Federal standards AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action III Strategy,for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Camelot,FM.SIB—Freight MANY Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal Transit Administration[Federal],RES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],In—Intelligent Transportation Systems(Federal],LID— Local Improvement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[Slate] 28 i 99 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004-2009 PROJECT: Commuter/Shopper Shuttle Bus Ongoing Citywide Program DESCRIPTION: Continue to provide enhanced transit service in the Downtown Kent business area through the use of a fixed-route shuttle service, with demand-responsive routing capabilities. Service route points will include King County Metro Park and Ride, South King County Regional Justice Center, and Kent City Hall, as well as local shopping and medical facilities. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.... $-0- Right of Way Acquisition :. ..$-0- Operations $140,000 TOTAL...........................................$140,000 *City share, which is equivalent to the lost fare box revenue that the county could have collected were not the city wanting a free service, (based on 6 years operating cost with 3%inflatton) FUNDING SOURCE (S): King County, City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The Shopper Shuttle provides mobility and independence to many of the city's seniors as well as school children and other citizens with limited' mobility options. The service addresses a significant transit market that may not be able to use the county's more traditional routes, and helps the city meet its road safety and transportation demand management goals ALP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],LAST—Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSig—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal Transit Administration[Federal],LIES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LIP— Local Improvement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surrace Transportation Program[Federal], _ TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation Improvement Baud[State],TFP -Transportation Partnership Program[State] 29 91 i I y s W S am Valle }lv :L= � I i a iB 100 8N. 21 m wy m 74 a vw•v na �.. J �rvas ' 71 r �- we rva � a � r m f w 9 �a r 0 oP , OO 'a ?C CD r4b CO 0 K e••h O m