Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Committees - Economic and Community Development - 06/11/2012 • Economic & Community Development �- KENT Wns HINQTQN Committee Agenda Councilmembers: Bill Boyce • Deborah Ranniger • Jamie Perry, Chair AGENDA Monday, June 11, 2012 5:30 p.m. Item Description Action Speaker(s) Time Pace 1. Approval of May 14, 2012 Minutes YES Jamie Perry 5 min 1 2. 2012 EPA Brownfield Grant YES Josh Hall 5 min 5 3. Downtown Subarea Action Plan YES Gloria Gould-Wessen 15 min 7 Planning Principles 4. Countywide Planning Policies Update NO Charlene Anderson 20 min 11 Informational Only 5. City Council's Strategic Plan Discussion NO Ben Wolters 5 min 0 Informational Only 6. Economic Development Report & NO Ben Wolters 10 min 0 Permit Process Update Informational Only Unless otherwise noted, the Planning and Economic Development Committee meets the 2nd Monday of each month at 5:30 p.m. in Council Chambers East, Kent City Hall, 220 4th Avenue South, Kent, 98032-5895. For information on the above item(s), the City of Kent's Website can be accessed at http://kentwa.igm2.com/citizens/Default.aspx?DepartmentID=1025 on Thursday, January 5, 2012 or contact Julie Pulliam, Pam Mottram or the respective project planner in the Planning Division at (253) 856-5454 or as indicated on the agenda. Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City Clerk's Office at(253) 856-5725 in advance. For TOO relay service call the Washington Telecommunications Relay Service at 1-800-833-6388. This page intentionally left blank. KENT ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES May 14, 2012 Committee Members Committee Chair Jamie Perry, Deborah Ranniger, Bill Boyce. Perry called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. 1. Approval of Minutes Councilmember Ranniger Moved and Councilmember Boyce Seconded a Motion to approve the April 9, 2012 Minutes. Motion PASSED 3-0. 2. Neighbors of West Hill Council - Resolution Program Coordinator Toni Azzola stated that the original West Hill Neighborhood Council dissolved and a new neighborhood council (a community of 1200 homes) was created. She introduced Neighbors of West Hill Council representatives: Chair Sandra Glover, Co-Chair Vivian Bruns, North Advocate Charlotte Dalbec, and West Advocate Don Bowers. Bruns stated that their diverse community appreciates the services Kent provides that will continue to assist their community in dealing with safety, traffic and beautification issues. Councilmember Ranniger Moved and Councilmember Boyce Seconded a Motion to recommend Council adopt the proposed resolution which repeals Resolution 1781 and recognizes the Neighbors of West Hill Council Neighborhood Council, supports its community building efforts, and confers all opportunities offered by the City's Neighborhood Program. Motion PASSED 3-0. 3. Downtown Strategic Action Plan (DSAP) Update - Resolution Planner/GIS Coordinator Gloria Gould-Wessen stated that Economic and Community Development (ECD) staff identified the DSAP update as a priority in their 2012 work program and this update is based on Council's strategic goal to create urban centers. Gould-Wessen stated that through the process of updating the DSAP: (1)Staff will review what Kent has achieved and will update recommended strategic actions to reflect potential new directions, (2) Staff will expand the DSAP to function more like Kent's Comprehensive Plan to include Chapters such as Transportation, Land Use, Economic Development, Parks & Open Space, and Utilities, (3) Staff will complete a Planned Action Ordinance (PAO) based on the DSAP update and will include an environmental analysis that will facilitate the permitting process and new development in downtown. The update effort will reach out to the community and will include stakeholders to hear what is going right and what is missing in downtown. Gould-Wessen stated that other city departments will be engaged to participate in this update. It is staff's belief that this update will facilitate new development and ensure that downtown will continue to have the successes like we see happening today. Gould-Wessen stated that the resolution is a necessary first step to initiate the DSAP update. Kent has established a procedure for amending the Comprehensive ECDC Minutes May 14,2012 Page 1 of 2 Plan outside the annual updates and that procedure reflects the State's RCWs. To declare this action as an emergency means this issue is of community-wide significance that promotes public health, safety and general welfare whereby the DSAP meets those criteria. Once the resolution goes to the Full Council and is approved, staff will notify the State Department of Commerce that we are moving forward with the update. Staff will report back to this Committee. Councilmember Boyce Moved and Councilmember Ranniger Seconded a Motion to move forward a resolution to Kent City Council that declares an emergency to pursue an amendment to the Kent Comprehensive Plan to revise the City of Kent Downtown Strategic Action Plan. Motion PASSED 3-0. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: Medical Mariivana Ordinance Planner Katie Graves stated that the intent of this hearing is to discuss zoning options for medical marijuana collective gardens. The Public Safety Committee stated at their April loth meeting that the Economic and Community Development Committee (ECDC) should consider this issue at their next meeting and recommended that the ECDC recommend an ordinance to City Council to ban collective gardens. Graves stated that City Council did not pass Ordinance 4025 in January. Graves submitted five exhibits for the record: (1) Email dated May 10 from David Hallin supporting collective gardens specifically Herbal Choice. (2) Email dated May 12 from Eric Munson, a prevention specialist and drug and alcohol counselor, opposing collective gardens. (3) An article published by Huff Post Politics an internet newspaper and written by Tamar Todd a staff attorney for the Drug Policy Alliance supporting medical marijuana collective gardens. (4) A letter from John Worthington supporting collective gardens and opposing a ban. (5) A 3-page excerpt submitted at the hearing citing RCW's that govern collective gardens. Councilmember Ranniger moved and Councilmember Boyce seconded a Motion to accept the five exhibits into the record. Motion PASSED 3-0. Councilmember Perry declared the Public Hearing Open. The following people spoke in SUPPORT of medical cannabis collective gardens in Kent opposing the ordinance that would ban collective gardens: Philip Dowdy, 1608 E. Republican St. #303, Seattle, WA 98112; Ezra Eickmeyer, Statewide Lobbyist for Safe Access Alliance, 4930 Center Rd, Chimacum, WA 98325; John Worthington, 4500 SE 2nd Place, Renton, WA 98059; Kari Boiter, 4224 S 216th Place, Kent, WA 98032; Steve Sarich, representative for Cannacare; Toni Mills, 25000 180th Ave SE, Kent, WA 98042; Jane Coffron, 25657 29th Ave S, Kent, WA 98032; Jennifer LaDoux, 9721 S 248th St., Kent, WA 98030; David Hallin, 31678 Military Rd. S, Federal Way, WA 98001; John McArthur, 11018 SE 218th St., Kent, WA 98031; Laura Ellison, 600 Ellingson Rd., Apt I-3, Auburn, WA 98047; Steven Schneider, 5510 S 144th St., Tukwila, WA 98168; Matthew Zaborac, c/o Downtown Emergency Services Center (D.E.S.C.), PO Box 67145, 511 Third Ave, Seattle, WA 98104; Koli Bolden, 27400 132nd Ave SE, Apt #G-205, Kent, WA 98042; Pam Larsen, 20615 SE 148th, Kent, WA 98042; Charles Lambert, 925 E. Maple St, Kent, WA 98030; Greta Carter, 452 University Way #67, Seattle, WA 98101; Michael Ranetta, 2007 S 232nd St., Des Moines, WA 98198; Neal Schanbeck, 93 Byrd Drive, WA; Colomba Tsang, 21628 43rd PI S, Kent, WA 98032 - submitted two binders of information on how medical marijuana is used to treat numerous medical diseases/illnesses; Michael Enos, 11805 SE 255th St., Kent, WA ECDC Minutes May 14,2012 Page 2 of 3 98030; Don Skakie, 4313 SE 2nd Place, New Castle, WA 98059; Robby Shaver, 25032 Lake Fenwick Rd, Kent, WA 98032; Steve Manzanares, 22816 126th Ave SE, Kent, WA 98031; Jonathan Blake, 22702 90th Way S, Kent, WA 98031; Jared Allaway, (Sensible Washington), 35810 16th Ave S #F303, Federal Way, WA 98003; John Tocher, (Sensible Washington), 13521 SE 161st Place, Renton, WA 98058; Douglas Hyatt, Attorney, 119 1st Avenue S, Suite 16, Seattle, WA 98104; Katherin Ranzoni, 830 Stetson Avenue, Kent, WA 98031; Heinz Strakeljohn, 13228 SE 231st St., Kent, WA 98042 The following people spoke in OPPOSITION to medical cannabis collective gardens in Kent supporting the ordinance to ban collective gardens: Randy Beaulien, 710 Marion St, Kent, WA 98030; Derek Franklin, Washington Association for Substance Abuse & Violence Prevention (WASAVP) supported a continued moratorium. Seeing no further speakers, Councilmember Ranniger Moved and Councilmember Boyce Seconded a Motion to Close the Public Hearing. Motion PASSED 3-0. Councilmember Boyce Moved and Councilmember Ranniger Seconded a Motion to recommend adoption of the medical cannabis collective garden ordinance and to forward on to City Council. Motion PASSED 2-1 with Perry Opposed. Councilmember Perry announced that this issue will be heard before the full Council on June 5th Adiournment Committee Chair Perry adjourned the meeting at 7:30 p.m. Pamela Mottram, Secretary Economic & Community Development Committee PIAPlanningAECDC\2012\Mlnutes\051412_Mln.doc ECDC Minutes May 14,2012 Page 3 of 4 This page intentionally left blank. 5 ECONOMIC and COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Ben Wolters, Director PLANNING DIVISION Fred N Satterstrom, AICP, Planning Director KENT Charlene Anderson, AICP, Planning Manager WASHIWGTON Phone: 253-856-5454 Fax: 253-856-6454 Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, WA 98032-5895 June 7, 2012 TO: Chair Jamie Perry and Economic & Community Development Committee FROM: Josh Hall, Economic Development Specialist RE: 2012 EPA Brownfield Grant For Meeting of June 11, 2012 MOTION: Move to recommend Council authorize the Mayor to accept the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) grants in the amount of $400,000, amend the budget, and authorize expenditure of the funds in accordance with the grant terms acceptable to the Economic and Community Development Director and City Attorney. SUMMARY: The City of Kent has been awarded a total of $400,000 from the EPA to conduct a community-wide assessment for Hazardous Substance Brownfields and Petroleum Brownfields. The City will use these funds to complete a community-wide inventory and prioritization of brownfield sites within the City, as well as perform up to 16 Phase I and 10 Phase II environmental site assessments on identified sites, complete additional site investigation and remedial action plans for select sites, and perform community outreach and education related to brownfields. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: A brownfield is a property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties increases local tax bases, facilitates job growth, utilizes existing infrastructure, takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. There currently is not a formal inventory of brownfield sites within the City. A review of environmental databases maintained by the Washington State Department of Ecology document the presence in the City of 1,047 potentially impacted sites, including 582 hazardous waste generators, 294 underground storage tank (UST) sites, 136 leaking UST (LUST) sites, and three Superfund sites. A Phase I property assessment includes a historical investigation and preliminary site inspection. A Phase II assessment is more in-depth and includes sampling activities to indentify the types and concentrations of contaminants, and the areas to be cleaned. ]H/pm P:\Planning\ECDC\2012\Packet Documents\06-11-12\2012 EPA Brownfield ECDC Menno.docx cc: Ben Wolters,ECD Director 6 This page intentionally left blank. 7 ECONOMIC and COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Ben Wolters, Director PLANNING DIVISION Fred N Satterstrom, AICP, Planning Director KENT Charlene Anderson, AICP, Planning Manager WASHINGTON Phone: 253-856-5454 Fax: 253-856-6454 Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, WA 98032-5895 June 7, 2012 TO: Chair Jamie Perry and Economic & Community Development Committee FROM: Gloria Gould-Wessen, Planner/GIS Coordinator RE: Downtown Subarea Action Plan Update & PAO (CPA-2012-1): Planning Principles For Meeting of June 11, 2012 MOTION: Move to confirm and forward to Kent City Council the planning principles for the Downtown Strategic Action Plan 2012 Update as developed by the Economic and Community Development Department. SUMMARY: The planning principles provide a foundation for the Downtown Subarea Action Plan (DSAP) update. The DSAP update will refresh strategic actions adopted in 2005. The update effort will engage stakeholders, reflect current economic development opportunities, and identify actions to advance the vision for downtown. A Planned Action Ordinance (PAO) to incentivize redevelopment will also be an outcome of the DSAP update. The planning principles will guide the public outreach and project outcomes. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: On May 14, 2012, the Economic and Community Development Committee moved to direct staff to update the Downtown Strategic Action Plan and on June 5, 2012, City Council passed Resolution 1857 that found the aforementioned update an issue of community-wide significance and authorizes staff and the Land Use and Planning Board to process this amendment. The planning principles set the tone for the DSAP update effort, and can be drawn upon throughout the process. GGW/pm S:\Permit\Plan\COMP_PLAN_AMENDMENTS\2012\CPA-2012-1 Downtown\Counci1\06-13-12_ECDC_Memo.doc Enc Attach A: DSAP 2012 Update: Planning Principles cc: Ben Wolters,Economic&Community Development Director Fred Satterstrom,AICP,Planning Director Charlene Anderson,AICP,Planning Manager David GalaAn,Assistant City Attorney Hie 8 This page intentionally left blank. 9 I in'towin Stibaii-eatiibin II' IIII i 01 m IIIp)da,t� IIII�IIIIuir�uir�liiiuir� IIII'�uumliiiuir� liilllllbllll 1. III' eirrioirallbllie IIC owinutowini IIkII:X[P iiriiieiri e The plan will help to make downtown Kent an extraordinary place whether one lives in downtown or comes to shop or visit. It is attractive and safe, with year- round activities that contribute to its interest. It is the heart of Kent. 2. Ili:coinioirnuliic Vitality The plan's proposed actions will contribute to the economic vitality of the downtown. Downtown should provide a mix of service and retail businesses that are important to the local community, including those who reside in downtown. The success of business in downtown is key to the area's future growth. 3. Uurllbairi III livallbliilllliity The plan will recognize that downtown is a desirable place to live. A variety of housing choices are available, including stylish apartments and condominiums. With well-designed open spaces, convenient services, and entertainment opportunities close-by, downtown truly becomes its own neighborhood. 4. 111 tiir ilia iinu IlPirliioirliity The plan will strive to create a downtown where the built environment suggests a "pedestrian first" message. It will be easy, comfortable, and safe for those who walk or ride a bike, and there will be strong connections to surrounding neighborhoods. 5. IlEii�!irjo)yallbllle t:Iurtdoo)ir yll4mace The plan will encourage a system of public as well as private outdoor spaces that enhances the downtown experience for people. Larger open spaces and small pocket parks combined with urban plazas, passageways, sidewalk cafes, and other outdoor opportunities add another dimension to urban living. 6. „Illhullboiirllhii000 q:I 1oiininulli'patiliillbliilllliity Illb�,mn� The plan seeks to connect surrounding neighborhoods with the activities and opportunities of downtown. The transition in urban development from downtown to its surrounding neighborhoods should be gentle and gracious. 7. IIEIII!unv!!IuroiiniirineiritaIII Suistaiiiniallbliilllliity The plan should seek to minimize adverse environmental impacts. Best practices for sustainable building and land management should be part of the plan. 8. 1 oiininuuninuliitiininueuniit to :Ili:uninulli�pllleiininueunli t The downtown planning effort should include an implementation strategy that leads to the fulfillment of the vision. SIAPermitAPlanACOMP_PWN_AMENDMEMSr2012VcPA2012-1DO nt Wn\Downt WnPrincpesl doc 10 This page intentionally left blank. 11 ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Ben Wolters, Director PLANNING DIVISION Fred Satterstrom, AICP, Director 11- KEN T Charlene Anderson, AICP, Manager was,,, rn Phone: 253-856-5454 Fax: 253-856-6454 Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, WA 98032-5895 June 7, 2012 TO: Chair Jamie Perry and Economic & Community Development Committee FROM: Charlene Anderson, AICP, Planning Manager RE: Countywide Planning Policies Update For June 11, 2012 meeting MOTION: None required. For information only. SUMMARY: The King County Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) approved updates of the Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs) on September 21, 2011. Included in the updates are interim targets for affordable housing, pending continued interjurisdictional work on the issue, and placeholders related to extension of sewers and siting of schools in the Rural Area. Resolution of these issues is expected in the very near future, and the GMPC then can include the policies in the final transmittal of the CPPs to the King County Council for approval and subsequent ratification by King County jurisdictions. Also included in the updates are housing and employment targets for King County's jurisdictions to 2031. The CPPs serve as the framework for each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan. BACKGROUND: The Economic & Community Development Committee reviewed draft CPPs on April 11, 2011 and expressed concern about the allocation of proposed targets for affordable housing. At the June 111h meeting, staff will provide an update on the policies that were approved by the GMPC, as well as the latest work on affordable housing and school siting. It is anticipated that King County jurisdictions will be asked to consider ratification of the Countywide Planning Policies early next year. Link to the CPPs approved by the GMPC on September 21" http://www.kingwunty.gov/property/permits/codes/growth/GMPQCPPsApproved.aspx. One could categorize the updates into the following themes: • Integrate public health and safety with land use and transportation • Connect, cooperate, coordinate, collaborate • Environmental sustainability • Maintain, preserve, reuse, conserve, sustain • Focus on Centers • Housing for all • Foster social equity and environmental justice • Economic growth and job creation • Measure, monitor, review, amend CA\pm\S:\Permit\Plan\COMP_PLAN_AMENDMENTS\2012\Countywide_Planning_Policies\06112012_ECDCmemo.doc Enc Summary of Approved CPPs cc: Fred Satterstrom,AICP,Planning Director Charlene Anderson,AICP,Planning Manager David GalaAn,A Mtgnt City Attorney Project File 12 This page intentionally left blank. 13 Countywide Planning Policies Staff Summary Framework • Periodic review and amendment of CPPs • Monitor and benchmark • Work collaboratively on funding sources Environment • Protection and restoration • Low impact development approaches • Sustainable energy future • Regionally significant open space networks • Environmental justice • Basin-wide approaches • Cooperative floodplain management • Puget Sound Action Agenda • Multi-jurisdictional approaches • Minimize air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions — reduction target, inventory, measurement • Reduce fossil fuel consumption • Climate change adaptation strategies Development Patterns • Focus growth in Urban Growth Area within Centers • Protect rural and resource lands • Mix of uses at densities to promote public health and alternatives to auto travel • Safe routes to schools • Access to healthy food • Urban Separators • Compatible land uses adjacent to general aviation airports • Accommodate 20-year growth targets • Review and evaluations of buildable lands, reasonable measures to increase land capacity • Coordinated planning and annexations, including roadways • Urban Centers, Manufacturing/Industrial Centers, local centers • Urban design and historic preservation • Infill, redevelopment, reuse • Green infrastructure • Transfer of development rights Housina • Address countywide need — moderate, low, very-low area median income • Inventory and analysis of local needs • Strategies for providing housing for all • Transit-oriented development — affordable, accessible • Regional cooperation • Monitor, review, amend 6/11/12 ECDC Page 2 of 3 14 Economy • Regional coordination and public/private partnerships • Industry clusters • Evaluate performance, economic metrics • Transparent, efficient, predictable regulations and policies • Foster exports outside region • Small businesses create jobs • Retain key major institutions and facilities • Support regional food economy • Education and training • Cultural diversity • Economic justice • Urban Centers and Manufacturing/Industrial Centers • Convenient and safe access to local services and transportation choices • Natural environment = key economic asset • Adequate land supply — inventory, plan, monitor supply and development capacity • Redevelopment of contaminated sites • Limits in Rural Area/Resource Lands Transportation • Integrated, multi-modal system — active lifestyle • Regional cooperation and financing • Avoid capacity expansion in Rural Area/Resource Lands • Focus on Centers and connecting corridors — greenhouse gas reductions • Transit-supportive development and integration • Consistency with regional and county policies/strategies • Prioritize funding that support growth targets • Freight mobility strategies • Maintenance, preservation, safety improvements • Transportation facilities integrated with natural and built environment • Prevention/recovery strategies and disaster response plans • Promote tolling and other pricing strategies • Monitor • Minimize negative impacts to human health • Alternative fuel vehicles Public Facilities and Services • Full range of urban services in Urban Growth Area; limit in Rural Area • Multi-interest coordination • Cities are ultimate providers of urban services • Impacts of climate change on water resources • Safe, reliable, sustainable water source; conservation and efficiencies • Public sewer systems or alternative technologies • Reduce solid waste stream • Energy conservation; use of renewable and alternative sources • Telecommunication infrastructure • Human and community services • Equitable locations for essential public capital facilities 6/11/12 ECDC Page 3 of 3 15 6/6/2412 2015 Comprehensive Plan Update_ Sf lh f ..M-. r J�y�.Vrta�� p�Ir Y Ion u.n y of � x_ is Implementation—Relevant Statutes Optional Municipal Code'Chayx[¢r35Ab3 RCW/ Growth Management Act,Local Project Review,Land Use Petition Act(Chapters 36.70A,36,700 and 36.70C RCW) Shoreline Management Act(Chapter 90.58 RCM Suhc ivisinn act lChapter 58.17 RCW) state Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)(Chopter43.21C RCWp Kent City Cede Relevant,Organizations 'KIP C+P�'+�7r+1��g�e'�me�a'Cpla Ad9g,'ut�dll{C�MPCt- ,Ebcndq�F�l aupe6m'NA�g�mNgJGs / a'e Itfdcandem nx " i7 Pjine'[a�j '�ptclPJ.k.'aYPdKdLdPfvtl Ed�Rd�hm Pdrt'of5n IXa°zf�+4ytl;,,, 1 16 6/6/2Q12 Countywide Planning Policies Update Fiat�rancecteir, • Hicapna tar all o Emiremmeneal smpurpt oliry(Maini praserve,neusa,sense" snseain) o fnebure public hearthand sai with Hand use avid mnneperwilksm • Pascal uooi.al Basal and ermrirunmprvea HiunM1oe G ot,N ic.craven aind iobcreatien o cc nnom,cooperage,coevdinats,aoltaborate u Meaavre,ri it.,re,cew,amand Extension of sewers into Rural Alrea p School land in Rural Area o conflicts o Provide quahty education for all children c Extension of urban seevEoes into rural areas. a Community based approach to school siting u Whattudi? Recommended',policies—school siting Ho Limit rmut-esidentlal unless dependenton rural smatipn o Appropriate size,scale,nature o Restrict extend of urban infrastructure or Locate com an unity facilities and services accessible to Hhose being served. o For those servingmral areas,locate in neighboring cities or ruralt wns 2 17 6/6/2,a12 Countywide Planning Policies Housing Chapter June 2012 Y " { v Countywide Planning Policies Partl Cauatvwida Planmiag Policies o Status oFCPP Update o GMA Provisions related to housing o Wherewestarted: Issues raised during CPP update o Differences between 1994 and 2012.Housing Chapter © Whereweended: Dverarchinl a Overviewof Caumtywirlelt ausi ng Needs/City Needs n Steps for Addressing Housing Needs Status of CPP Update In 2.011,the Growth Management Planning Council{GMPC) began the first thorough update of the King County Countywide Planning Policies in,20 years. o Key Steps • Sept.,2011: GMPC acted on majarityof CPPs • June2012: GMPC acts on Update to Housing Policies • End 2012: King County Council acts on updated CPPs 2023 City Action on CPPs-ratification • June,2015 City Comprehensive Plan Updates 3 18 6/6/2012 GMA Provisions Related To Housing o HalusiinR afPoNabVv in all acanavnic segmentls m Promote,a variety of residentW densities and hissing oyrse,and m Erecu,oe Fresenatlon of er[Aing hymning Haack(ROW 36,10A.920) n A housing Minorco he, ,a.d., entory and aralysIo of sallying and pm rs,cad ho,eing rods; o,Fr1ien1 land for hauling;and' ado,...pnmbldos for coating and plmp`er1rdl.needs of all —.1—In segments,IRCW ae7aieclo) Housing a C cerne YdentllY d bywaraP olds,In scan h Ning Car cty p I'res don't artatint for afford hduty m .foemIngh s g o Associate,housing m ads not Eeimg met ",°.,• °"^"„ • vwnevy of h tier ln9 receded ns anowcd the y)j'ZJ a Wn'o ue needs an d challengss of by on, .„v.,. far Very,low broom, 1994 and 2012 ON -Major Differences 2012 Housing Chapter: is Establishes ashroma countywide need four affordable housing; 0, E If urinates assigned affordable housing targets; rt Focuses an implementation strategies to most the countywide.sad; o Calls out needs for Very Low Income;and o Establishes a four step process to accomplish this approach �. 4 19 6/6/2012 Overarching Goal The housing needs of all economic and demographic groups are met within all jurisdictions. ce gmphasiaes,countywide need for very low,Iowand mad crate income housing o Each jurisdiction is responsible for taking proactive measures to move towards providinga proportionate share of the need. o Focuses on Implementation strategies ratlher thar,formal targets 4 Step Process Cycle of local,government actions: 1.Conduct housing supply inventory and needs assessment (H-3); I implement policies and strategies to address unmet ineeds (H-5): 3.Manner and measure results(H-17);and 4.Respond to measurement with reassessment and adjustment of strategies(H-18). Countymcle Affordable Housing Need iawe tw�rs4.Alnp, anemo iiti yam 1xi5m� 1 arx» ica. wwmo cxiwrx nvu ... *.vra rv.rm wn-ua.. .anv dn�a,.[xup Wem.anteim,m mwmr nnmur.u.... ornr WO..il e..v and Garwmn ed Hamxohatlds Ohav arc em nmra ner namsenada:aN+mmmc eramn 4xmnsl Jr 20 6/6/201.2 Affordability Guidelines 2010 VERYhOW INCOME:90%MEDIAN INCOME Aral irco.e'S➢05mp-$16AOh H—I,Mr.—$,,is-$13 ao Lllmdable Hart$45@,5N43 IO4V IINCOME:50%MECIAN INCOME Rrvn.oal Y.o.e:53q,8Np-$X%p0p Hn.Im M.ma:$15.9QSE29q X.n.dable RrnC.5]sm=SLmo M6bERAI,IN[bM F:80➢4.MEDIAN INCOME Annual hwomnm A9,25m-5>8,400, aXfaranHe dome:fi:zam=51;/tl hFfundz4le Mam+e vrtc¢$]ol HNB 5R9N,300 201$MEDIAN(INCOME.$88,000(ramilYaf L) Local Affordable Housing Availability treat Progress in accammDAating:couptyanda IeMamg Heeds Aaw/Made.Nl c9me Heusin&MRto4 '. n mn N4}0#�v8 I&X% x mmbinralnw xM aeryhm«zs 3x la,se3 unrls) '.. m Moderate Iola.¢NAr.mAapnf 35.9% V,I2,:193-1i151 Vlmmed Housing 6...c1189Stp31h9,1]p IInMs ¢n m1V d N df Aff rd NI H I g What is olur Local Responsibility? implement policies&strategies driven by loc A conditions m t9mai cmntml offVategins arvd ap�prmaahes o CteaPing balanlc ai ho.ene a NsaogmNl�g 1psat reswlts Affondabllhycfexl5nin,bmmeMNg • IpNOrts byjurledia[ions la address gaps a Rea agmiaimg that I'ooai goNaln.A.t hae a rain in h..uvfrng o Role Ylmpebtad by.ngeafctherplaryerz and market conditions 6 21 6j6/2012 Strategies based on local conditions cities win hardabueirs oxmamn�inR eemmvwid¢u¢w amm madem0e lincame n�eetls mOghl [ocuseohouxn6pnaxx,, bn ' Nedo.hralgetedn¢¢d5(H.R S¢tl1G(5,V¢teaRS,w'efSp0l.5 etch di.sabilitiosl o CtNes wMene aarrradable hcustlnp tUtk does ant matehl caontywide bw and moderato Income needs mlgh1. explore to lrceneuiae new affordable hougingtWraugh land use atel arvd other imtenemes srvppprt now aYfort�ablm housing tPoat recervms hvdmmak om statle t Io pre erne eaut e FPorts tlo pwserveexistisrg afiaNabtle hauling Shared Responsibility—Very Low Income Very ww I..rvlkdt(H-z) o Tlho pevizi:aw of hoas pg affordabla to very law Inceme dawseholds v.� ondy be fullilk,]with tlmthqurisd'.i Udeal coaprcztiwm and! bo,bs(a.,Fedarau Tax Crad65,Suth,Maualmg Tnet Fund,court, Mlpusing Progarm,ARCM Trust Fwndl. a AI iur sdhtkars expected to current this need both at purnderopeal levea and coppebovepI,on a .ndtywde or rswbs.o-wmty lbas, Other Issues addressed in Housing CPPs o Sufcier t zoning capacity for range of housing types and to accommodate overall growth goads(I4-4) o Preservation of existing affordable housing ill-it) o HobSing accessible to major employment centers lH-9) a Hoaslegur proximity to inamsit corridors(i o MaintalnexistVngnVghbcrhondcharauer(H-11) o Promotethe health and wel6heingof residents(+1>••1 o Promote fair housing(H-13) a Region':cooperiionlH.14—H-16) 7 22 6/6/2012 2011 SAMPLE SALARIES a �m l N �p ,r°F."'A�' �i0;°�r.ram,r 4F""'�,�'°✓'' ;*`�`,rr" Who Needs Affordable H000rlgy Ag45PAo�, (ilblluma�nil JlAnen P IfOA Ai IAOaz( 3mA., A, v ... M R -lu a°aoo, J r lu will f I myf 4 9i arw wvilxr � /// h I d W 1r9 m842a.5]3. 3 ESfi9. p 0 H M1eA a tl0%AIWI Luv tarn em.tal frexn.[fl sYeu ng 163.04)°r q pe0.µn HM n� Fmil,en aan d....peNvinyf3'O,ea6pWifull- IinPr°km�ala AO Ilmk mnAl[nl znvtrzkry ea Inry 69tl.9�YY vm4s AC,9tl�0 1 9f.E/13.1 �l HOUSEHOLD TYPE: King.County(2009) sl�sm As was the case °afar'' in 2000,one and tw0'P,M. households Pascual 64 poreent or al Goun¢y household,. 8 23 6/6/2012 POPULATION BY AGE:King County(2009) • King Ccumy vs ]vw likelq 4m sWm.tM1¢ addiCian M aver zbu ggP,qgrvg:ir,in mrs,r daab ,i the Ssx PnP I t n me Sos PWet 16 to AO y4a,a. ;µ Ove,too Paa4 PO q cn ncreandmg <5 519 ]I!N ]S 1 %S 6A fi5'✓9 ]Y (/bnW tlr AnnMAp SY.n(75.iin O4Wr a4e�/5 a COSH BURDENED HOUSEHOLDS King County(2ooa) • ucW4defiaale ro hkaly 10 CdSfV2Rly is it lr coat ''. burannea. Not Gast iod fiost Hurd h....W s, Is G05Y BI1ltlEOCd .......nd younger and irs sovemly Cost oleo, '. 8urd¢n¢d hmdseholaa mW muWh On"to b wal burvfmnW.a, Rental Housing Affordability RmhllNnurcl�nlfiood]Me Yofoa Ort!an!WauuMWda S uth Kim uw.lma Gauntly hhs tha enlow umu nao. highest 9mi6af 54.ru yppg metal ti usin rentzlable tog ammm an, affard.Ele to law y IA'w'+ R]y y?tlry in.... h.... asu= houseMPlrNs t'`tuw 10a" {>50h)aod.East °'avow wmv telo aotlky has Iv' _ thhe tawaet poportton 24 6/6/2012 r �I�1 r D I i1puC uro of I7DIiYs r J 'I rardlabld HM s 50% h VVIII M t IN /I �a tg 9(G M e pv tIVl 2mnA _ 2 le[hn,diAPPN�dGIxN Housing Costs as a Percent of Income 'oM ..... Na5lmrvVotltY Hf YbW4Xll5[d11JiP NpmseFpYasway f n e IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIWIIII ( m la u',d sY2/7 IV n 3enpla,mep„g v¢- Iw»a >raasR¢I'ral,Hallo,� S�oQo w.»x�ui.,..» o:.mpp xra.0 inmww mucPaY lens m..xas.olin�rne '..rm Mvsung. roll � txal n le palnu'o� __ Fau�inp' ASSISTED HOUSING IN KING COUNTY ASSISTED HOUSING ITHRU 2010) x.a� e.n. a.w e.0 xrmx. .... w..d .m9}.yFJA,M45u 1m X.—MUO .utl Itf¢ YN —MAY _vr"w &9 fiU£IiAli�!M,Hlmi.Sn.... - ly¢ e,MV LNN ,o�a�m �, Hove Ono vs•o AM _MI MF9,kMIP:ftlJT�n0korto 'gym roa xyan(l _ww,Yll'NANrtPAMv Vf a.enrm. n ¢anv us¢ a.351v anYw.nwr>sweravmwn'F ,,,,,,ywo,,_.ywm uxm .....?x'ue m 10 25 6/6/;2012 RMYIEM5,1,11" Ss Homelessness in King CountyKING OUN FY �KING t:auNrr o On any given night In Rang County,more than 8,000 people are homiwuacs.Ih,Wd.,; or x,soo pmmpla in.omargemay shmhrsr, or 3,30o m eramamimnal a..rte mom enan a,6�o we.oure <na parmRdmprs. o A high pmpmrtipa mf homelessafe familues wlRh cfiildren. 0 NA000ally Mr,to met p(haMaen worNen With children may have eapefleuced dmoe,r,Wer.ce on.,or hecoming elem_ ('IYMm I'1'4HL'IM1I 10 Yeah Plan to End Homel�assness HUMFtESSNFS.S KING COUNTY o�ocaeesirehous�eforchameleaspeopleby a V 9.500 thi 10 years(2006-2016) 0 o PdwaPrralt homa... • Pmaenleasnasa • MovelReWderzpidlyfd,h h....sq thesslo hadyof ° InCeeasFth¢eM➢eiervcW of the cwrpina F, Budd O_ q. • Budd One pubol'p and political wiuu to / lc • Measureand PeporS gmtcofnes. Lla//q COYXAInYPE'tCI Li1X Efforts to Address Homelessness HOMF.d:F5sNF55 K1NU Cb1UNTY f)Pondlnlq of Wnr tt,500 uN11s M PermanPnl5appmnia@ HOuslrvg(pSH) • nESC°slgii Eastlake-]5 of tka Homiest to saava hmmeless. •• tReduoaaddms tmgnmi lealoil dl&e.aa ease in asg ahrvd c ye aserm� c eis aSents. amteenth a ig Begin atHoepm, ZOhigh Agree and ppmimately$1.5milllan,vdnpinthiefirsimaf n/Kr o Fandcr"s C'raapY Ign'respara¢s and planning acdivitie In,.k1P,Irvcladed 92 dlffeRnS ramuraaa tatadligg$66 mihlan. 0 System-wide Soordlmaeed entry into programs for chmndtally homeless md'eidand &far fined a. o LWnalmd Uaimn P'roua,t .bdaohall,incaeasad awes,ca privata morkot rentals. �1 26 6/6/2012 Questions? 12