HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Committees - Planning and Economic Development Committee - 10/17/2005 i Planning & Economic Development
• Committee Agenda
KEN T Councilmembers: Ron Harmon.Bruce White.Tim Clark,Chair
_... _W_n5_H_I.N GTON
October 17, 2005
4:00 p.m.
Item Description Action Speaker Time Page
1. Approval of the Minutes of 9/19/05 YES 1 Min 1
2. Zoning Code Amendment#ZCA-2005-3 YES Damien Hooper 10 Min 3
Commercial Motor Vehicles in Residential
Zoning Districts.
3. Zoning Code Amendment#ZCA-2005-7 YES Damien Hooper 10 Min 5
Shipping Containers in Residential
Zoning Districts.
4. Urban Density Study#CPA-2004-5 YES Charlene Anderson 40 Min 33
Packet for Council Members already
Distributed.
Unless otherwise noted,the Planning and Economic Development Committee meets the 3`6 Monday of
each month at 4:00 p.m. in Council Chambers East, Kent City Hall, 220 4th Avenue South,Kent, 98032-
5895. For information on the above items, the City of Kent's Website can be accessed at
http://www.ei.kent.wa.us/CityCouncil/committees/planning.asp or contact Pamela Mottram or the
respective project planner in Planning Services at(253) 856-5454.
Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City Clerk's Office at
(253)856-5725 in advance. For TDD relay service call the Washington Telecommunications Relay
Service at1-800-833-6388.
This page intentionally left blank.
i
PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 19,2005
Committee Members: Chair Tim Clark, Ron Harmon, Bruce White
The meeting was called to order by Chair Clark at 4:00 P.M.
Approval of Minutes
Member White moved and Member Harmon seconded a motion to approve the minutes of
August 15, 2005. Motion Passed 3-0.
ZCA 2005-3 Commercial Motor Vehicles in Residential Zonine Districts
Planner Damien Hooper stated that this amendment was heard before the Land Use and Planning
Board then sent to Committee August 15`h and forwarded on to City Council on September 6
where it was remanded to Committee. He stated that staff has since reviewed what surrounding
jurisdictions have done with commercial vehicles in their residential zones. Mr. Hooper stated
the staff report includes copies of code sections from Auburn, Bellevue, Puyallup, Redmond,
Renton, Sumner, Tacoma, Tukwila, Tumwater and Woodinville.
Mr. Hooper stated that of those ten jurisdictions, only three jurisdictions allow commercial
vehicles to be parked or stored on private property, with two of the jurisdictions specifically
excluding semi-trucks and trailers, but allowing other types of commercial vehicles. He stated
that Tukwila would allow a semi-tractor to be parked on a residential property.
Chair Clark clarified the nature of the proposal then accepted public testimony.
Jerry Sanders, 23102 1121h Place SE, Kent, WA stated that his livelihood depends on the use
of a truck and spoke in support of the independent truck driver's right to park their trucks on
their residential sites. He addressed his views associated with cost and the inconvenience for off-
site parking, quality of life and view restrictions. In response to Councilmember Harmon, Mr.
Sanders stated he would be supportive if vehicles under 18,000 pounds were exempted from the
restriction.
Dick Staples, 14629 SE 2671h Street, Kent, WA stated that he hauls freight and spoke in
support of the independent truck driver to park their trucks on residential sites, addressing cost
impacts associated with off-site parking, the potential for vandalism and view obstruction. He
stated that he has parked his 22/23 foot long trailer weighing approximately 16,000 pounds on
his residential site for nine years without complaints from his neighbors noting that other
neighbors park motor homes or fifth-wheel trailers on their property that range in length from 35
to 40 feet in length. In response to Chair Clark,Mr. Staples stated he has a large lot.
Judy Hanford, 24736 1361h Ave SE, Kent, WA stated that she objects to the commercial trucks
and trailers parked (typically on right-of-ways) along major roadways and on a church lot,
throughout Kent, endangering pedestrians and obstructing vehicular views. She urged the
Committee to consider enacting a law to stop this type of parking. Ms. Hanford submitted
pictures indicating various locations where these trucks are parking. Addressing questions from
Councilmembers Harmon and White, Ms. Hanford stated about 90% of the vehicles are on right-
of-way and 10% on private property. The Committee Members clarified which pictures were of
sites in Kent and which were in unincorporated King County.
Tom Sharp, 24254 143rd Ave. SE, Kent, WA spoke in opposition to commercial vehicles
parked in residential zoning districts citing property rights and zoning compliance issues. He
indicated through pictures submitted for the record, several locations throughout Kent where
semi trucks and/or trailers are parked in residential zoning districts. He urged the Committee to
consider enacting an ordinance to support the City's code compliance people. In response to
Councilmember White, Mr. Sharp stated these vehicles are commercial in nature and are not
meant for residential zones.
Ralph Linderman, 14029 SE 194`h St., Renton, WA spoke in opposition to commercial
vehicles parked along roadways or in residential districts, encouraging the city to implement
regulations enforcing compliance in Kent. He voiced concern for the safety of children.
2
Damien Hooper defined recreational vehicles as indicated in the City's zoning code, with
Planning Manager Charlene Anderson clarifying some issues within the code. Mr. Hooper
concurred with Chair Clark's supposition that recreational vehicles are to be screened from view.
In response to Chair Clark's request, Ms. Anderson stated that staff would fmd out what
restrictions the county places in urbanized areas on arterials. Chair Clark requested staff alert the
County on trucks parked on right-of-way. He also asked staff to keep track of the number of
complaints.
Mr. Hooper stated that the Police Department enforces the City's traffic code which currently
prohibits the parking of commercial vehicles on a public right-of-way.
Member Harmon moved and Member White seconded a motion to accept the pictures submitted
by Judy Hanford and Tom Sharp for the record. Motion passed 3-0.
Chair Clark stated that he would like to see a definition in place to distinguish between the types
of commercial trucks allowed in residential districts. He stated that he also is concerned aobut
the noise impact as trucks are warmed up. Member Harmon stated that staff needs to address on-
street parking, address parking of commercial vehicles on property on 132nd possibly by meeting
with that group to educate them of the City's rules and regulations, and additionally suggesting
that staff consider employing the use of conditional use permits through the Hearing Examiner
process for those who want to park commercial vehicles on their property.
Member White asked staff to provide statistics with regard to the number and nature of
complaints received by the City with respect to single owner operators parking their commercial
vehicles in residential neighborhoods, stating that he would like a determination as to whether it
is the actual parking of the commercial vehicle or how that vehicle is stored in residential
neighborhoods that is creating problems.
• After the Committee deliberated, Ms. Anderson addressed questions raised by Chair Clark and
Member Harmon with respect to establishing applicable criteria for a conditional use permit as
well as reviewing the City's home occupation license as a possible way to execute solutions for
commercial vehicles parked in residential zoning districts. Chair Clark asked that this
amendment be brought back to Committee after staff has reviewed further options.
ZCA-2005-7 Shipping Containers in Residential Zoning Districts
Jerry Sanders, 23102 112t Place SE, Kent, WA stated that the nature of his work requires the
use of thirty-yard containers stored on the sites of homes he is renovating. He stated that it is not
possible to complete a renovation within the 72 hour limitation as set forth in Kent's ordinance.
Member Harmon stated that an active construction permit would allow for the temporary
container to remain on site for the duration of the project. Mr. Hooper concurred.
Chair Clark asked that staff bring this item back to the Committee with a report that shows the
locations where shipping containers are stored in residential zoning districts. Councilmember
White would like a report of number and nature of complaints.
Growth Management Hrgs Board Decision on Recent Urban Density Case—City of Bothell
Assistant City Attorney, Kim Adams Pratt submitted a letter for the record summarizing the
Board's decision with regard to the City of Bothell; listing the six questions the Growth
Management Hearings Board (GMHB) stated they will look at when they review urban density
issues. Ms. Pratt explained why the GMHB found Bothell to be in compliance with the Growth
Management Act with regard to their urban densities. Chair Clark asked Ms. Pratt to please
review the City's position on a proposal before the Suburban Cities Association concerning the
urban density issue.
Adjournment
Chair Clark adjourned the meeting at 5:15 p.m
Pamela Mottram,
Admin Secretary, Planning Services
S.IPermihPlanTlanning Committee120051Minutes1081505min.doc
P&EDC Meeting Minutes—9/19/05
Page 2 of 2
3
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Fred N. Satterstrom, AICP,Director
PLANNING SERVICES
KENT Charlene Anderson,AICP,Manager
WA9 HI N OTDN
---- Phone:253-856-5454
Fax: 253-856-6454
Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S.
Kent,WA 98032-5895
October 17, 2005
TO: Chair Tim Clark and Planning & Economic Development Committee Members
FROM: Damien Hooper, Planner
RE: Zoning Code Amendment#ZCA-2005-3/KIVA RPP6-2052401
Commercial motor vehicles in residential zoning districts.
MOTION: I move to approve/deny/modify Zoning Code Amendment#2005-3, as
recommended by the Land Use &Planning Board.
SUMMARY: On September 19, 2005 the Planning & Economic Development Committee
considered the Land Use & Planning Board recommendation to amend Kent City Code to limit
the storage and parking of commercial motor vehicles in residential zoning districts. At this
meeting, the Committee requested additional permitting options from staff. On September 6,
2005, the City Council had remanded this item to the Planning and Economic Development
Committee for additional review. Previously on August 15, 2005 the Planning & Economic
Development Committee had voted 2:1 to approve the Land Use & Planning Board
recommendation of approval of the proposal, albeit with a request for staff to provide additional
information related to the number of complaints the City has received on this issue.
BUDGET IMPACT: None
BACKGROUND: Staff is bringing forward to the Committee four options relating to
commercial vehicles in residential zones. Generally these options include, 1) allow storage and
parking of commercial vehicles outright, either in whole or in part 2) disallow storage and
parking of commercial vehicles outright (LU&PB recommendation), 3) allow storage and
parking of commercial vehicles through Conditional Use Permit, 4) allow storage and parking of
commercial vehicles via Special Home Occupation permit, or 5) deny the proposed amendment.
Option 1: Allow commercial vehicles outright on private property in residential zones, either in
whole (tractor & trailer) or in part (tractor only or trailer only). This would require clarification
in the code as it is currently interpreted that these vehicles are not allowed.
Option 2: Disallow storage and parking of commercial vehicles in residential zones, as
recommended by the Land Use &Planning Board.
The Planning & Economic Development Committee and Land Use & Planning Board previously
recommended the following code amendments:
KCC 15.08.085: Commercial motor vehicles are not permitted to he parked on residentially-
zoned property unless actively loading or unloading goods or unless approved through a Home
Occupation permit or other land use permit. "Commercial motor vehicles" include: 1) vehicles
4
used in a commercial enterprise which exceed 19 feet in length; and 2) truck tractors used in the
drayage of semi-truck trailers.
KCC 15.02.XXX: Motor vehicle means a vehicle, machine, tractor, trailer, or semitrailer
propelled or drawn by mechanical power used on highways, or any other vehicle required to be
registered under the laws of this state, but does not include a vehicle, machine, tractor, trailer,
or semitrailer operated exclusively on a rail.
OORtion 3: Allow the storage and parking of commercial vehicles on residentially zoned
property by means of conditional use permit. Conditional uses are permitted outright in a given
zoning district provided they can meet the criteria for approval established in KCC 15.09.030(D).
In the case of Conditional Uses, the Hearing Examiner is obligated to grant approval of the
request provided the aforementioned criteria have been satisfied.
Option 4: Allow the storage and parking of commercial vehicles on residentially zoned
property by means of Special Home Occupation permit. There are currently 5 home
occupations that require this form of review by the Hearing Examiner as established in KCC
15.08.040(F). These include music lessons, dance lessons, art lessons, academic tutoring, and
automobile detailing. If this option is preferred a category for home occupations requiring use of
commercial vehicle would be added to this list.
The Special Home Occupation is similar to the Conditional Use option in that it requires review
and approval by the Hearing Examiner. However, because the use would not be an outright
permitted use in the zone, the City and/or Hearing Examiner would be able to consider the nature
and conditions of all adjacent uses and structures in the decision. A special home occupation
permit may be granted only if the Hearing Examiner finds that the permit will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property in the zone or vicinity in which the
property is located, and that the issuance of such special home occupation permit will be
consistent with the spirit and purpose of the code provision. Also, the Hearing Examiner may
impose conditions as necessary to protect other properties in the zone or vicinity.
Option 5: Deny the proposed amendment. Staff would then work with existing code language.
The Committee may also desire to modify the definition of commercial motor vehicles, perhaps
considering 18,000 pounds as the limit on vehicle weight. Should the Committee desire to
modify the Land Use & Planning Board recommendation, it likely will require a new public
hearing.
CAIDHIpm S:IPermillPianIZONECODEAMEND12 0 0512 05 240 1-2 0 05-3pedelO1705.doc
cc: Fred N.Satterstrom,AICP,CD Director
Charlene Anderson,AICP,Planning Mgr
Kim Mamusek,Principal Planner
Damien Hooper,Planner
Project File
Parties of Record:
Barry N.Bender Jr.,Ms.Margaret Bauer,Ms.Tanya Reeves,Robert Bray,Tom Sharp,Judy Hanford,Jerry Sanders,Dick Staples,
Ralph Linderman
5
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Fred N. Satterstrom, AICP,Director
PLANNING SERVICES
KE N T Charlene Anderson,AICP,Manager
w s H N o*s N Phone:253-856-5454
Fax: 253-856-6454
Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S.
Kent,WA 98032-5895
October 11, 2005
TO: Chair Tim Clark and Planning&Economic Development Committee Members
FROM: Damien Hooper,Planner
RE: Zoning Code Amendment 4ZCA-2005-7/KIVA RPP6-2052605
Shipping Containers in residential zoning districts.
MOTION: I move to recommend/not recommend approval of#ZCA-2005-7,amending Chapter 15 of
Kent City Code to limit the placement of shipping containers in residential zoning districts, as
recommended by the Land Use&Planning Board.
SUMMARY: At their August 15 and September 19 meetings, the Planning & Economic Development
Committee requested additional information from staff regarding a proposal to limit the placement of
shipping containers in residential zoning districts. After holding a public hearing on August 8`s,the Land
Use &Planning Board unanimously recommended approval of the proposal.
BUDGET IMPACT: None
BACKGROUND: The City's Zoning Code recognizes the need of all legitimate uses of land to be
protected from other uses which are unrelated or incompatible (KCC 15.01.020.C.2). The City has
received a number of complaints related to shipping containers located in residential neighborhoods.
These containers present an incompatibility with residential uses,particularly related to visual blight.
The Land Use& Planning Board is recommending the following code amendments:
KCC 15.04.170: Add Note 34 in "Additional Standards" section of all SR, MR and MHP zoning
districts. KCC 15.04.180 (34) would read "Shipping Containers No person shall place ore ause to be
placed any shipping container on any portion of a property located within this zone. This restriction does
not apply to containers collecting debris or accepting household goods for moving that are located on
residential property for less than 72 hours.
The SEPA Responsible Official has determined the proposed amendments are procedural in nature and
categorically exempt from environmental review.
Planning staff and the City's Code Enforcement Officer will be present at the Committee meeting to
answer questions about this proposal. Also included in the Committee's packet are copies of relevant
regulations from other cities, portions of which (definitions?) the Committee may desire to add to the
proposed amendment. The Committee may also decide to deny the proposal, which means staff would
work with existing code language.
DH/CA/pm/S:\Permit\Plan\ZONECODEAMEN D\2005\2052605-2005-7pedc 101705.doc
Encl.: Code Excerptsftom Burien.SeaTac, Tukwila,Lakewood and Puyallup
cc: Fred N.Satterstrom,A ICP,CD Director
Charlene Anderson,AICP,Planning Mgr
• Kim Marousek,Principal Planner
Damien Hooper,Planner
Brian Swanberg,Code Enforcement Officer
Project File
Parties of Record: Robert Bray,Jerry Sanders
6
This page intentionally left blank.
RE: Research Request Page 1 of . 7
Anderson, Charlene
From: Sue Enger[senger@mrsc.org]
Sent: Monday,September 12,2005 3:55 PM
To: Anderson, Charlene
Subject: RE: Research Request
The following codes address shipping containers in residential areas or in general:
o Burien Municipal Code, §19,17.040 htti)://www.ci.burien.wa.us/commdvlvmnVzoning/zQia 17.pdf
o ScaTac Municipal Code Secs. 15.10.098 -
http://www.ci.seatac.wa.us/mcode/sm_cI51009800.htm, 15.13.062, 15.13.063, and
15.13.064-htt //www.ci.seatac.wa.us/mcode/smcl5.1300000.htm
o Moses Lake Municipal Code, Chapter 18.76 Cargo Containers - hmp://www.ci.mo-se-s-
j
lake.wa.us/files/documents/muniCiDaI code/CHAP1876 pdf and http://www ci.moses-
lake.wa.us/files/documents/municiDaalcode%CHAP 1806.13df
o Tukwila Municipal Code, §18.50.060 — Cargo Containers as Accessory Uses, 18.06.137
(definition), 18.10.030(7), 18.12.030(7), and 18.14.030(6) — permitted uses in various
residential zones -h".._//www_ .ci.tukwita.wa.us/tmc/titleI8.pdf
o Tukwila Ordinance No. 1989 - httpl/www nusc.or&/ords480989.Of
o Riverside (CA) Municipal Code, §19.73.010, 19.73.060 — 090 -
http://www.riversideca.gov/ciiy—clerk/Title%2Ol9/19.pdf
These codes simply prohibit cargo containers:
o Brewster Municipal Code, sec. 17.10.120 — see section B — prohibits cargo containers as
accessory building - kttp://nt5.scbbs.com/pgi-bin/om isaDi.dll?
clientID=267879&infobase=brewster.nfo&jump=17.10&softpage=PL_frame#JUMPDEST_
o Cheney Municipal Code, secs. 21.08.455 — definition<hLtp://www.bpcnet.com/codes/cheney/
and 21.48.070> and
http://www.bpcnet.com/codes/cheney/_DATA/TITLE21/Chapter_21_48_General_Use—Pro'
—prohibits shipping containers as storage buildings or living units
o Pasco Municipal Code, secs. 25.12.430, 25.22.030(3), 25.24.030(3), and 25.26.030 —
prohibits container storage- .http://www.ci.vasco.wa.us/Dmc/T tle25.html
o Cashmere Municipal Code - Secs. 17.08.010(S) and 17.58.090(A)(5)
http://www.ci�Qfcashrriere.orWincludes/tit]el7-incl.htm
o Lakewood Municipal Code, §18A.50.140(E) — prohibits in residential zones -
http://municode.cityoflakewood.us/toc.php?TitleNumber=l 8A#
o Puyallup Municipal Code, §20.20.040(15) & 20.20.040(17)
htt�//www.mrsc.org/mc/�uyallup/Pu ay 1120.htm1#20.20
•
9/12/2005
RE: Research Request Page 2 of 8
Burien and SeaTac have the most comprehensive regulations I could find concerning cargo containers.
Note how SeaTac has defined cargo containers as structures when used for purposes other than storage.
Susan C. Enger
Planning Consultant
Municipal Research &Services Center
2601 4th Ave, Suite 800
Seattle,WA 98121-1280
Phone: (206)625-1300
Fax: (206)625-1220
E-mail: senger@mrsc.org
-----Original Message—
From: Shannon Shaffer On Behalf Of Receptionist
Sent: Friday, September 09,2005 1:29 PM
To:Sue Enger
Subject: FW: Research Request
---Original Message-----
• From: Canderson@ci.kent.wa.us [mai Ito:CandersonO-)ci_kent.wa_usl
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 12:41 PM
To: Receptionist
Subject: Research Request
Name: Charlene Anderson
City or County Employed by:City of Kent
Department: Community Development
Position: Planning Manager
Phone: (253)856-5431
Fax: (253)856-6454
Address:
220 4th Avenue South
Kent,WA 98032-5895
E-mail: Canderson@ci.kent.wa.us
Research Request:
Do you know of cities who regulate the placement of shipping containers/rail cars to be used for storage in
residential zoning districts?
•
9/12/2005
9
D. The availability or lack of alternative locations for the proposed adsdt arertairrrmr fadlity,and
E. The extent to which the proposed adult arertaimrar faak can be avoided by alternative
vehicular and pedestrian routes;and
F. The extent to which the apphavr can minimize the adverse secondary effects associated with
the proposed adult erratavrmr fadhty.[Ord.396$ 1,2003,Ord.291$2,2000]
.040 Cargo Containers
1. Purpose. The purpose of this section is to promote vibrant,attractive pedestrian nixed use areas
while protecting residential neighborhoods and allow use of cogo wwa.r=by Butien businesses,
contractors and community-related wa to provide secure,easily accessible affisaystorage at
relatively inexpensive levels.
2. Temporary Use. Carta arraitm may be used for temporary storage of equipment and/or
materials at a construction site during active construction that is authorized by a city permit.
3. CIRT m%%inas are not allowed in the Downtown Commercial(DC),Office(0),Neighborhood
Center(0�and Special Planning Area 1 (SPA-1)zones,except as permitted in BMC 19.17.0402.
4. CoW arrainnm are permitted as aaasay usa in rsi lvtt zais at a a msouty fadlit3y gvc nvMr
faakt,8 brsprtal,p dtc park and mmud t faa4 or sdvd.
A. All requirements,permits and approvals of BMC Titles 15,18 and 19 pertaining to stnatsns
shall apply,including but not limited to sus,la tnteraA oisiadam and transition area
requirements.
B. Cargn avravm located within a rsubrial zar shall be no greater in size than ten(10)feet by
twenty(20)feet,and shall have a stick-built stnasar constructed to completely enclose the a%p
arum:Upon removal of the az?W arraimr the screening sP Azae shall also be removed No
stick built stnxtureshall be required if the atrgoarrairrris totally samglfrom abutting rsidarial
zcm lots as determined by the Dbeiv.
C Q iW cvrairrrs shall not be stacked.
D. Qtrgo wfamas shall not occupy any required off-street prkogspaca,vehicular access,
pedestrian facilities or landscape areas for the sitg
5. Qaba mtav=are permitted as aassory usa in the Industrial (I),Intersection Commercial (a),
Community Commercial(C)G 1 and C C,2),Regional Commercial(CI),Special Planning Area 3
(SPA-3),Special Planning Area 4(SPA-4)zones and in the SPA-2 zone as part of the master plan
review(pursuant to BMC 19.15.060.1). QV miainm in these zones are subject to the requirements
below. Airplane wait laid derirs located in the I and SPA-4 zones are not regulated as arV arraimp .
A. All requirements,permits and approvals of BMC Titles 15,IS and 19 pertaining to stnatras
shall apply,including but not limited to sabades,la wwu&r oituaarea and transition area
requirements.
B. Cargo arrairers shall be sowed from abutting roo-cf v ay and acl drarg lass with a ruin=mum of
10 feet of Type I/arrl:apirg. The Dirtaa may approve alternate sotvurg that achieves the intent
of a visual barrier. In reviewing alternate soanirg,the Dirazor shall consider the proposed
Chapter 19.17-Mist.Standards City of Burien,Washington
(Revised 4/05) Page 17-7
10
location of the ango arrtair,amount of usable space on the site for lair/aog view of the¢ergo
w,mwrr from abutting r s•cf vuy and ac dnr glas,and the physical condition of the atT9
ca=vrr. All proposed sawnT shall be submitted for the review and approval by the Dinars:
C. Cargo artamm shall not be located between a bolding and fiarrt pmpeny hm On a sue with all
fxsn prTerty fires,the atrgo anwiner shall be placed in a location that minim visual impact of
the arrgvartxmrfrom surrounding streets and properties.
D. Qngv arzdim shall be painted to match the primary color of the adjacent bidlclirg.If the anger
awaater is located within a hd/dirg or not visible from abutting 74&-cf-vay and 4 ni?glots as
determined by the Diretar,painting is not required.
E. A¢ergo arira»rr located within 100 feet of a miim"zarr shall be no greater in size than ten
(10)feet by twenty(20)feet,and shall have a stick-built smew constructed to completely
enclose the¢sego¢maven.Upon removal of the arrgo arrairrr the screening smoasne shall also be
removed.No stick-bat srnrarnashall be required if the axrgroyrairrris totallyscr®ied from
abutting raiderricrl zone ku as determined by the Dmuw.
F. C47 artainm shall not occupy any required off-street pvrkingspaa,vehicular access,
pedestrian facilities or landscape areas for the site
G. Cargo wiainm maybe stacked two-high in the Industrial m zone,and shall not be stacked in
any other zone.
H. Cargo amoners shall not be used for warehouse/storage as the primary use of the property.
. I. Outdoor¢ergo w%za rrs shall not be refrigerated.
6. Legal Nonconforming Cargo Containers: Q7 arr ainm that have been legally located on a sire
prior to November 12,2002 shall be a legal naxaqrrvrrirg srnrdrrre In addition to the provisions for
nonconforming structures in BMC 19.55,anger mvabxn shall lose legal nararfwrnrg status under the
following circumstances:
A. Any legal nmrY fw rg=F mraimr-that is moved to a different location on a site shall
comply with the requirements of BMC 19.17.040.
B. If a legal nonconforming augo arraineris removed from a sire,any subsequent¢ergo arrairm
placed on the site shall comply with the requirements of BMC Titles 15,18 and 19.
7. Illegal Cargo Containers: Cargo artai ws located on a site prior to{Effective date of ordinance)
that do not have all required permits and approvals are considered illegal and shall have until(12
months after effective date of ordinance) to either come into compliance with BMC Titles 15,18
and 19 or be removed.
8. Permits for¢sego azraarn shall include all necessary approvals from the Direta,Building Official
and Fire Marshal. Required permits include a building permit and a General Use Fire Permit.Use of
the container shall not inhibit the Building Official and/or Fire Marshal from conducting all
necessary inspections. [Ord.396$1,2003,Ord.369§l,2002;Ord.313 51,2000]
Chapter 19.17-Misc.Standards City of Burien,Washington
(Revised 4105) Page 17-8
15.10.098 Cargo Containers Page 1 of
15.10.098 Cargo Containers
A standardized, reusable vessel, designed without an axle or wheels,
which was:
A. Originally, specifically, or formerly designed for or used in the
packing, shipping, movement or transportation of freight, articles,
goods or commodities; and/or
B. Designed for or capable of being mounted or moved on a rail car;
and/or
C. Designed for or capable of being mounted on a chassis or bogie
for movement by truck trailer or loaded on a ship.
When used for any purpose other than those listed in subsection A of
this section, a cargo container is a structure (SMC 15.10.631). (Ord.
01-1010 § 1)
Updated July 7, 2005
� Current Through Ord. 05-1008 City of SeaTac
TQC P { Home voice:206.973.4660
Fax:206.973.4809
V Emril
http://www.ci.seatac.wa.us/mcode/smcl5l009800.htm 9/12/2005
Iof � 12
15.10.631 Structure Page
leist a
15.10.631 Structure
Anything which is built or constructed (above or below grade), an
edifice of building of any kind, or any piece of work artificially built-up
or composed of parts joined together in some definite manner,
excluding benches, statuary, utility boxes/lights, light poles, minor
utility apertures, planter boxes less than forty-two (42) inches in
height, fences seventy-two (72) inches or under in height, and
residential tent structures. (Ord. 03-1016 § 2; Ord. 95-1016 § 6; Ord.
92-1041 § 1)
Updated July 7, 2005 City of SeaTac
Current Through Ord. 05-1008 Hone Page
s
TO Voice:206.973.4660
Fax:206.973.4809
E-mail
http://www.cl.seatac.wa.us/mcode/smcl51063100.htm 9/12/2005
15.13.062 Cargo Containers — Where Allowed and Regulations Page 1 of 13
15.13.062 Cargo Containers—Where Allowed and Regulations
Cargo containers shall be allowed only within the Community
Business (CB), Community Business-Urban Center (CB-C), Aviation
Business Center (ABC) and Industrial (1) zones, subject to the
following provisions:
A. Cargo containers shall be stacked no more than two (2) containers
high. Stacking of cargo containers within a building is prohibited;
B. Cargo containers shall be screened from adjacent properties and
rights-of-way. Screening may be a combination of solid fencing,
landscaping, or the placement of the cargo containers behind,
between, or within buildings. All proposed screening shall be
submitted for the review and approval by the Director of Planning
and Community Development;
C. Cargo containers within the CB-C zone shall not be used for
warehouse/storage as the primary use of the property;
D. If a cargo container is located on a lot adjacent to a residential
zone, the cargo container shall be no greater in size than ten (10)
feet by twenty (20) feet, and shall have a stick-built structure, with
a peaked roof, constructed to completely enclose the container.
No stick-built structure shall be required if the cargo container is
totally screened from adjacent residential properties as
determined by the Director of Planning and Community
Development.
Adjacent property is defined as property that abuts the residential
zone. Property located across a public right-of-way is not regarded
as adjacent property;
E. Cargo containers shall not occupy any required off-street parking
spaces for the site or property and the location must comply with
all setback requirements;
F. The location and use of cargo containers on a site shall conform to
all requirements and approvals of SMC Titles 13 and 15;
G. The location of a cargo container within a structure shall be
approved by the Fire Department and Building Division. (Ord. 01-
http://www.ci.seatac.wa.us/mcode/smcl5l306200.htm 9/12/2005
15.13.062 Cargo Containers —Where Allowed and Regulations Page 2 of 14
1010 § 2)
Updated July 7, 2005 City of SeaTac
Current Through Ord. 05-1008 Home Page
Toe !w Voice:206.973.4660
Fax:206.973.4809
v `. E-mail
http://www.ci.seatac.wa.us/mcode/smcl51306200.htm 9/12/2005
15.13.063 Cargo Containers—Accessory Use Page 1 of 15
15.13.063 Cargo Containers—Accessory Use
A. The Director of Planning and Community Development may allow
a cargo container as an accessory use for permitted or conditional
uses, but not including dwelling units, in all other zones not listed
in SMC 15.13.062, subject to the criteria set forth in subsection B
of this section.
B. Cargo containers allowed as an accessory use shall conform with
the following criteria:
1. Be located to minimize the visual impact to adjacent
properties, streets, and pedestrian facilities;
2. Be painted to match the color(s) of the adjacent building. If the
container is located within a building or not visible from
adjacent properties as determined by the Director of Planning
and Community Development, painting is not required;
3. Be screened from adjacent properties and rights-of-way.
Screening may be a combination of solid fencing, landscaping,
or the placement of the cargo containers behind, between, or
within buildings. All proposed screening shall be submitted for
review and approval by the Director of Planning and
Community Development;
4. The location and use of cargo containers on a site shall
conform to all requirements and approvals of SMC Titles 13
and 15;
5. The location of a cargo container within a structure shall be
approved by the Fire Department and Building Division;
6. Cargo containers shall not occupy any required off-street
parking spaces for the site or property and the location must
comply with all setback requirements;
7. If a cargo container is located on a lot within, or adjacent to a
residential zone, the cargo container shall be no greater in size
than ten (10) feet by twenty (20) feet, and shall have a stick-
built structure, with a peaked roof, constructed to completely
http://www.ci.seatac.wa.us/mcode/smcl5l3O6300.htm 9/12/2005
Page � 16
15.13.063 Cargo Containers —Accessory Use Pa g
enclose the container. No stick-built structure shall be required if
the cargo container is totally screened from adjacent properties
as determined by the Director of Planning and Community
Development;
8. Only one (1) cargo container shall be allowed on property
located within a residential zone or on property located
adjacent to a residential zone. The property owner may
request additional cargo containers subject to the Conditional
Use Permit (CUP) process under SMC 15.2.2_,_0.30.
Adjacent property is defined as property that abuts the
residential zone. Property located across a public right-of-way
is not regarded as adjacent property;
9. Cargo containers shall not be stacked. (Ord. 01-1010 § 3)
Updated July 7, 2005 City of SeaTac
Current Through Ord. 05-1008 Ham@ Pam
Woe:206.973.4660
Fax:206.973.4809
l/,,; E-mail
http://www.ci.seatac.wa.us/mcode/smcl51306300.htm 9/12/2005
15.13.064 Cargo Containers— Loss of Nonconforming Status Page 1 of . 17
M
T�{oe
15.13.064 Cargo Containers— Loss of Nonconforming Status
Cargo containers that have been legally located on property prior to
the adoption of the ordinance codified in SMC 15.13.062 and
15.13.063 shall be a legal nonconforming use of the property. Cargo
containers shall lose legal nonconforming status under the following
circumstances:
A. Any legal nonconforming cargo container that is moved to a
different location on a site shall comply with the requirements of
SMC 15.13.062 and/or 15.13.063.
B. If a legal nonconforming cargo container is removed from a
property, any subsequent cargo containers placed on the property
shall comply with the requirements of SMC 15.13.062 and/or
15.13.063.
iC. If a legal nonconforming cargo container is moved off a residential
zoned property containing a residential use, no new container may
be moved onto the property. (Ord. 01-1010 §4)
Updated July 7, 2005
A Current Through Ord. 05-1008 City of SeaTac
Home Page
TOP Voice:206.973.4660
Fax;206.973.4809
E-mail
http://www.ci.seatac.wa.us/mcode/smcl5l306400.htm 9/12/2005
18
This page intentionally left blank.
19
P
TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE
i 18.06.105 Building Line 2. Designed for or capable of being mounted
"Building line" means the line of face or corner of or moved on a rail car; and/or
part of a building nearest the property line. 3. Designed for or capable of being mounted
(Ord. 1758 gl(part), 1995) on a chassis or bogie for movement by truck trailer or
loaded on a ship.
18.06.110 Building, Nonconforming (Ord. 1989§L 2002)
"Nonconforming building" means a building or
structure which does not conform in its construction, 18.06.140 Certified Arborisl
area, yard requirements or height to the regulations of "Certified arborist" means an arborist certified by
the district in which it is located. the International Society of Arboriculture or National
(Ord. 1758§I(part), 1995) Arborist Association.
(Ord. 1758 §1(part), 1995)
18.06.115 Building Permit
"Building permit" means a permit for construction 18.06.145 Clearing
in accordance with specific approved plans that are on "Clearing" means removal or causing to be
file with the DCD. removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any
(Ord. 1758 gl(part), 1995) vegetation from a site. Actions considered to be clearing
include, but are not limited to, causing irreversible
18.06.118 Bulk Retail damage to roots or trunks; poisoning; destroying the
"Bulk Retail" is a business or store that specializes structural integrity; and/or any filling, excavation, grad-
in the sale of large goods, requiring large on-site storage. ing, or trenching in the root area of a tree which has the
Bulk retail is further distinguished by a lower trip potential to cause irreversible damage to the tree.
generation rate than other retail stores, as evidenced by (Ord. 1758 §1(part), 1995)
a traffic study or other appropriate analysis. Examples
include furniture stores, appliance stores and other 18.06.150 Clinic
uses as approved by the Director. "Clinic" means a building designed and used for
(Ord. 1795 §1(part), 1997) the medical, dental and surgical diagnosis and treatment
of patients under the care of doctors and nurses and/or
18.06.120 Bus Station practitioners.
"Bus station" means a facility providing connec- (Ord. 1758 §1(part), 1995)
tions between buses serving different inter-city routes.
(Ord. 1758§1(part), 1995) 18.06.152 Closed Record Appeal
"Closed record appeal" means a quasi-judicial
18.06.125 Caliper appeal to a hearing body designated by this chapter
"Caliper" means the American Association of Nur- from a decision regarding a project permit application
serymen standard for measurement of trunk size of that was made after an open record hearing. Testi-
nursery stock. Caliper of the trunk shall be taken 6 mony and submission of relevant evidence and
inches above the ground. information shall not be permitted at a hearing on such
(Ord. 1758 §I(part), 1995) an appeal. The hearing on such an appeal shall be
limited to argument based on the testimony, evidence
18.06.130 Canopy and documents submitted at the open record hearing
"Canopy" means an area encircling the base of a conducted on the project permit application.
tree, the minimum extent of which is delineated by a (Ord. 1768§1(part), 1996)
vertical line extending from the outer limit of a tree's
branch tips down to the ground. 18.06.155 Club
(Ord. 1758§1(part), 1995) "Club" means an incorporated or unincorporated
association of persons organized for a social, education,
18.06.135 Canopy Cover literary or charitable purpose.
"Canopy cover" means the cumulative areal (Ord. 1758 §1(part), 1995)
extent of the canopy of all trees on the site.
(Ord. 1758 §1(part), 1995) 18.06.165 Comprehensive Plan
18.06.137 Cargo Container "Comprehensive Plan" means the adopted City of
9 Tukwila Comprehensive Plan.
"Cargo container" means a standardized, reusable (Ord. 1758 §1(part), 1995)
vessel that was:
1. Originally, specifically or formerly designed
for or used in the packing, shipping, movement or
transportation of freight, articles, goods or commodities;
and/or,
Page 18-8 Printed February 2005
20
TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE
which shall become a part of the ordinance codified in 18.50.070 Yard Regulations
this section by adoption of the Council and found on A. Fences, walls, poles, posts, and other cus-
file in the office of the City Clerk. No building or struc- tomary yard accessories, ornaments, furniture may be
ture shall be erected, altered or maintained, nor shall permitted in any yard subject to height limitations and
any tree be allowed to grow to a height in excess of the requirements limiting obstruction of visibility to the
height limit herein established in any of the several detriment of public safety.
zones created by this section; provided, however, that B. In the case of through lots, unless the pre-
this provision shall not prohibit the construction of or vailing front yard pattern on adjoining lots indicates
alteration of a building or structure to a height of 35 feet otherwise, front yards shall be provided on all
above the average finish grade of the lot. Where an frontages.
area is covered by more than one height limitation C. Where the front yard that would normally be
zone, the more restrictive limitations shall prevail. required on a lot is not in keeping with the prevailing
Under the provision of this section, the City adopts the yard pattern, the DCD may waive the requirement for
following airport height map: Airport Height Map: King the normal front yard and substitute therefor a special
County International Airport (Boeing Field), August 1, yard requirement which shall not exceed the average
1986, and as the same may be amended. of the yards provided on adjacent lots.
(Ord. 1758 91(part), 1995) D. In the case of corner lots, a front yard of the
required depth shall be provided in accordance with
18.50.060 Cargo Containers as Accessory the prevailing yard pattern, and a second front yard of
Structures half the depth required generally for front yards in the
A. Cargo containers are allowed outright in the LI, district shall be provided on the other frontage.
HI, MIC/L, MIC/H and TVS zones, subject to building E. In the case of corner lots with more than two
setbacks. frontages, the DCD shall determine the front yard
B. New containers may be allowed as accessory requirements, subject to the following conditions:
structures in LDR, MDR, and HDR, for institutional uses 1. At least one front yard shall be provided
and in RC, RCM, TUC and C/LI for any permitted or having the full depth required generally in the district;
conditional use. All new containers are subject to a 2. The second front yard shall be the
Type 2 special permission decision and the restrictions minimum set forth in the district;
in the various zoning districts. 3. In the case of through lots and corner lots,
C. Criteria for approval are as follows: there will be no rear yards but only front and side
1. Only two cargo containers will be allowed yards;
per lot, maximum length of 40 feet. 4. In the case of through lots, side yards shall
2. The container is located to minimize the extend from the rear lines of front yards required. In
visual impact to adjacent properties, parks, trails and the case of corner lots, yards remaining after full and
rights-of-way as determined by the Director. half-depth front yards have been established shall be
3. The cargo container is sufficiently screened considered side yards. (See Figure 18-4.)
from adjacent properties, parks, trails and rights-of-way, (Ord. 1758 §I(part), 1995)
as determined by the Director. Screening may be a
combination of solid fencing, landscaping, or the 18.50.080 Exemption of Rooftop Appurtenances
placement of the cargo containers behind, between or The height limitations specified in this chapter shall
within buildings. not apply to church spires, monuments, chimneys,
4. If located adjacent to a building, the cargo water towers, elevator towers, mechanical equipment,
container must be painted to match the building's color. and other similar rooftop appurtenances usually
5. Cargo containers may not occupy any required to be placed above the roof level and not
required off-street parking spaces. intended for human occupancy or the provision of
6. Cargo containers shall meet all setback additional floor area; provided, that mechanical equip-
requirements for the zone. ment rooms or attic spaces are set back at least ten feet
7. Outdoor cargo containers may not be from the edge of the roof and do not exceed 20 feet in
refrigerated. height.
8. Outdoor cargo containers may not be (Ord. 1758 91(part), 1995)
stacked.
D. Licensed and bonded contractors may use cargo
containers in any zone for temporary storage of
equipment and/or materials at a construction site
during construction that is authorized by a City building
permit.
(Ord. 2066 91, 2004, Ord. 1989§9, 2002)
Page 18-102 Printed February 2005
21
iNot an Official Copy.
CITY OF TUKWILA,WASHINGTON
Ordinance No.1989
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NOS.
1758, AND 1976 AND CHAPTERS 18.06, 18.10, 18.12, 18.14, 18.24,
18.26, 18.28, 18.30, 18.50 AND 18.70 OF THE TUKWILA
MUNICIPAL CODE, TO CLARIFY AND UPDATE ZONING
CODE PROVISIONS REGULATING THE USE OF CARGO
CONTAINERS AS ACCESSORY BUILDINGS;PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY;AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Tukwila's development regulations may be reviewed and updated as
appropriate;and
WHEREAS, the City recognizes the proliferation of cargo or shipping containers being
used as accessory buildings;and
WHEREAS,shipping or cargo containers are appropriate for use as permanent accessory
buildings or storage sheds in residential or commercial zones only if they are properly located
and screened;and
WHEREAS, due to their size and industrial appearance, no new shipping or cargo
. containers are desired in residential zones except for use by specific institutions,and
WHEREAS,the City of Tukwila Planning Commission has recommended the adoption of
certain Zoning Code requirements;and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on the proposed amendments March
18,2002,after proper notice;and
WHEREAS, the City Council after having received and studied staff analysis and
comments from members of the public believes that certain amendments to the City's
development regulations are necessary;
NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,WASHINGTON,
DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. "Cargo Container" Defined. TMC Chapter 18.06, Definitions, is hereby
amended to add the following section:
18.06.137 Cargo container.
"Cargo container"means a standardized,reusable vessel that was:
1. Originally,specifically or formerly designed for or used in the packing, shipping,
movement or transportation of freight,articles,goods or commodities,and/or,
2. Designed for or capable of being mounted or moved on a rail car,and/or
3. Designed for or capable of being mounted on a chassis or bogie for movement by
truck trailer or loaded on a ship.
r�,V Cmmi.adJ13042
22
Section 2. Ordinance 1976§18,Ordinance 1758§1(part),as codified at Section 18.10.030 of
the Tukwila Municipal Code,(Low Density Residential)Accessory Uses,is hereby amended to
read as follows:
18.10.030 Accessory uses.
The following uses and structures customarily appurtenant to a permitted use,and clearly
incidental to such permitted use,are allowed within the Low Density Residential district.
1. Adult day care.
2. Accessory dwelling unit,provided:
a. minimum lot of 7,200 square feet;
b. accessory dwelling unit is no more than 33% of the square footage of the
primary residence and a maximum of 1,000 square feet,whichever is less;
c. one of the residences is the primary residence of a person who owns at least
50%of the property;
d. dwelling unit is incorporated into the primary detached single-family
residence,not a separate unit,so that both units appear to be of the same design as if
constructed at the same time;
e. minimum of three parking spaces on the property with units less than 600
square feet,and a minimum of four spaces for units over 600 square feet;and
f. the units are not sold as condominiums.
3. Family child care homes,provided the facility shall be licensed by the Department
of Social and Health Services Office of Child Care Policy and shall provide a safe passenger
loading zone.
4. Garage or carport(private)not exceeding L500 square feet in floor area,provided
it is located on the same lot as the principal use and is subject to the regulations affecting the
main building.
5. Greenhouses (noncommercial)and storage sheds not exceeding 1,000 square feet
in floor area.
6. Home occupations.
7. Institutional uses such as hospitals, food banks, schools,or government facilities
may have two cargo containers per lot with approval as a Type 2 decision;criteria are listed at
TMC 18.50.060.
8. Parking areas.
9. Private stable, if located not less than 60 feet from front lot line nor less than 30
feet from a side or rear lot line. It shall provide capacity for not more than one horse,mule or
pony for each 20,000 square feet of stable and pasture area,but not more than a total of two of
the above-mentioned animals shall be allowed on the same lot.
C.To Cn w,0,dr130,02
Section 3. Ordinance 1976§21,Ordinance 1758§1(part),as codified at Section 18,12.030 of 23
the Tukwila Municipal Code,(Medium Density Residential)Accessory Uses,is hereby amended
to read as follows:
18.12.030 Accessory uses.
The following uses and structures customarily appurtenant to a permitted use,and clearly
incidental to such permitted use,are allowed within the Medium Density Residential district.
1. Adult day care.
2. Accessory dwelling unit,provided:
a. minimum lot of 7,200 square feet,
b. accessory dwelling unit is no more than 33% of the square footage of the
primary residence and a maximum of 1,000 square feet,whichever is less;
c. one of the residences is the primary residence of a person who owns at least
50%of the property;
d. dwelling unit is incorporated into the primary detached single-family
residence, not a separate unit, so that both units appear to be of the same design as if
constructed at the same time;
e. minimum of three parking spaces on the property with units less than 600
square feet,and a minimum of four spaces for units over 600 square feet;and
f. the units are not sold as condominiums.
3. Family child care homes,provided the facility shall be licensed by the Department
of Social and Health Services Office of Child Care Policy and shall provide a safe passenger
loading zone.
4. Garage or carport(private)not exceeding 1,500 square feet in floor area,provided
it is located on the same lot as the principal use and is subject to the regulations affecting the
main building.
5. Greenhouses (noncommercial) and storage sheds not exceeding 1,000 square feet
in floor area.
6. Home occupations.
7. Institutional uses such as hospitals,food banks, schools, or government facilities
may have two cargo containers per lot with approval as a Type 2 decision;criteria are listed at
TMC 18.50.060.
8. Parking areas.
9. Private stable, if located not less than 60 feet from front lot line nor less than 30
feet from a side or rear lot line. It shall provide capacity for not more than one horse,mule or
pony for each 20,000 square feet of stable and pasture area,but not more than a total of two of
the above-mentioned animals shall be allowed on the same lot.
is
caWCo to ro.dsnoos
24
Section 4. Ordinance 1976§25,Ordinance 1758§1(part),as codified at Section 18.14.030 of
the Tukwila Municipal Code,(High Density Residential)Accessory Uses,is hereby amended to
read as follows:
18.14.030 Accessory uses.
The following uses and structures customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, and clearly
incidental to such permitted use,are allowed within the High Density Residential district.
1. Adult day care.
2. Accessory dwelling unit,provided:
a. minimum lot of 7,200 square feet;
b. accessory dwelling unit is no more than 33% of the square footage of the
primary residence and a maximum of 1,000 square feet,whichever is less;
c. one of the residences is the primary residence of a person who owns at least
50%of the property,
d. dwelling unit is incorporated into the primary detached single-family
residence, not a separate unit, so that both units appear to be of the same design as if
constructed at the same time;
e. minimum of three parking spaces on the property with units less than 600
square feet,and a minimum of four spaces for units over 600 square feet;and
f. the units are not sold as condominiums.
3. Family child care homes,provided the facility shall be licensed by the Department
of Social and Health Services Office of Child Care Policy and shall provide a safe passenger
loading zone.
4. Greenhouses (noncommercial)and storage sheds not exceeding 1,000 square feet
in floor area.
5. Home occupations.
6. Institutional uses such as hospitals, food banks, schools,or government facilities
may have two cargo containers per lot with approval as a Type 2 decision;criteria are listed at
TMC 18.50.060.
7. Parking areas.
8. Private stable, if located not less than 60 feet from front lot line nor less than 30
feet from a side or rear lot line.It shall provide capacity for not more than one horse, mule or
pony for each 20,000 square feet of stable and pasture area,but not more than a total of two of
the above-mentioned animals shall be allowed on the same lot.
Section 5. Ordinance 1976 §43 and Ordinance 1758 §1 (part), as codified at Section
18.24.030 of the Tukwila Municipal Code, (Regional Commercial) Accessory Uses, is hereby
amended to read as follows:
18.24.030 Accessory uses.
The following uses and structures customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, and clearly
incidental to such permitted use,are allowed within the Regional Commercial district.
�co„rau�,orJ�ooa
25
• 1. Adult day care.
2. Cargo container;two may be allowed per lot with approval as a Type 2 decision;
criteria are listed at TMC 18.50.060.
3. Dormitory as an accessory use to other uses that are otherwise permitted or
approved conditional uses such as churches,universities,colleges or schools.
4. Family child care homes,provided the facility shall be licensed by the Department
of Social and Health Services Office of Child Care Policy and shall provide a safe passenger
loading zone.
5. Parking areas.
6. Recreational area and facilities for employees.
7. Residences for security or maintenance personnel.
Section 6. Ordinance 1976 §46 and Ordinance 1758 §1 (part), as codified at Section
18.26.030 of the Tukwila Municipal Code, (Regional Commercial Mixed Use)Accessory Uses,is
hereby amended to read as follows:
18.26.030 Accessory uses.
The following uses and structures customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, and clearly
incidental to such permitted use, are allowed within the Regional Commercial Mixed Use
district.
• 1. Adult day care.
2. Cargo container;two may be allowed per lot with approval as a Type 2 decision;
criteria are listed at TMC 18.50.060.
3. Dormitory as an accessory use to other uses that are otherwise permitted or
approved conditional uses such as churches,universities,colleges or schools.
4. Family child care homes,provided the facility shall be licensed by the Department
of Social and Health Services Office of Child Care Policy and shall provide a safe passenger
loading zone.
5. Home occupation.
6. Parking areas.
7. Recreational area and facilities for employees.
8. Residences for security or maintenance personnel.
Section 7. Ordinance 1976 §49 and Ordinance 1758 §1 (part), as codified at Section
18.28.030 of the Tukwila Municipal Code, (Tukwila Urban Center) Accessory Uses, is hereby
amended to read as follows:
18.28.030 Accessory uses.
The following uses and structures customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, and clearly
incidental to such permitted use,are allowed within the Tukwila Urban Center district.
1. Adult day care.
Cargo Co w1w O,dJ/J0M
26
• 2. Cargo container;two may be allowed per lot with approval as a Type 2 decision;
criteria are listed at TMC 18.50.060.
3. Dormitory as an accessory use to other uses that are otherwise permitted or
approved conditional uses such as churches,universities,colleges or schools.
4. Family child care homes,provided the facility shall be licensed by the Department
of Social and Health Services Office of Child Care Policy and shall provide a safe passenger
loading zone.
5. Home occupation.
6. Parking areas.
7. Recreational area and facilities for employees.
8. Residences for security or maintenance personnel.
Section 8. Ordinance 1976 §52 and Ordinance 1758 §1 (part), as codified at Section
18.30.030 of the Tukwila Municipal Code, (Commercial Light Industrial) Accessory Uses, is
hereby amended to read as follows:
18.30.030 Accessory uses.
The following uses and structures customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, and clearly
incidental to such permitted use,are allowed within the Commercial Light Industrial district.
1. Cargo container;two may be allowed per lot with approval as a Type 2 decision;
criteria are listed at TMC 18.50.060.
2. Dormitory as an accessory use to other uses that are otherwise permitted or
approved conditional uses such as churches,universities,colleges or schools.
3. Parking areas.
4. Recreational area and facilities for employees.
5. Residences for security or maintenance personnel.
Section 9. A new section is hereby added to TMC Chapter 18.50, Supplemental
Development Standards,of the Tukwila Municipal Code to read as follows:
18.50.060 Cargo containers as accessory structures.
A. Cargo containers are allowed outright in the LI, HI, MIC/L, MIC/H and TVS zones,
subject to building setbacks.
B. New containers may be allowed as accessory structures in LDR,MDR,and HDR,for
institutional uses and in RC, RCM, TUC and C/Ll for any permitted or conditional use. All
new containers are subject to a Type 2 special permission decision and the restrictions in the
various zoning districts.
C. Criteria for approval are as follows:
1. Only two cargo containers will be allowed per lot,maximum length 30 feet.
2. The container is located to minimize the visual impact to adjacent properties,
parks,trails and rights-of-way as determined by the Director.
Cargo Corwin..a vmaw
27
• 3. The cargo container is sufficiently screened from adjacent properties,parks,trails
and rights-of-way, as determined by the Director. Screening may be a combination of solid
fencing, landscaping, or the placement of the cargo containers behind, between or within
buildings.
4. If located adjacent to a building,the cargo container must be painted to match the
building's color.
5. Cargo containers may not occupy any required off-street parking spaces.
6. Cargo containers shall meet all setback requirements for the zone.
7. Outdoor cargo containers may not be refrigerated.
8. Outdoor cargo containers may not be stacked.
D. Licensed and bonded contractors may use cargo containers in any zone for temporary
storage of equipment and/or materials at a construction site during construction that is
authorized by a City building permit.
Section 10. A new section is hereby added to TMC Chapter 18.70, Nonconforming Lots,
Structures and Uses,of the Tukwila Municipal Code to read as follows:
18.70.130 Cargo containers.
A. All cargo containers that have been installed in the LDR,MDR,HDR,MUO,O,RCC,
NCC, RC, RCM, TUC or C/Ll zones as of April 15, 2002 must either receive Type 2 special
permission approval or be removed by April 15,2003. Criteria for approval are as follows:
1. Only one cargo container will be allowed per lot.
2. The cargo container is sufficiently screened from adjacent properties,parks,trails
and rights-of-way, as determined by the Director. Screening may be a combination of solid
fencing, landscaping, or the placement of the cargo containers behind, between or within
buildings.
3. If located adjacent to a building,the cargo container must be painted to match the
building's color.
4. Cargo containers may not occupy any required off-street parking spaces.
5. Cargo containers shall meet all setback requirements for the zone.
6. Outdoor cargo containers may not be stacked.
B. All containers so approved will be considered legal structures and may remain in
place so long as the location and screening are not altered. If an approved cargo container is
moved off a residential zoned property containing a residential use,no new container may be
moved onto the property.
Section 11. Severability. If any section,subsection,paragraph,sentence,clause or phrase
of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or
unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of
this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation.
•
CarV Cm�nm Ord 5130M
'• Section 12. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the 2s
official newspaper of the City,and shall take effect and be in full force and effect five(5)days
after passage and publication as provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a
Regular Meeting thereof this 15 day of April 2002.
Steven M.Mullet,Mayor
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
Jane E.Cantu,CMC,City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By
Office of the City Attorney
i
•
Cargo COIIW,I O d 513042
Page 1 o . 29
E. Railroad cars, shipping containers, and semi-truck trailers shall not be placed or maintained
in any single-family residential, mixed residential, or multi-family residential zoning district.
(Ord. 307 ? 20, 2003; Ord. 277 ? 1(part), 2002; Ord. 264 ? 1 (part), 2001.)
•
http;//municode.cityoflakewood.us/show-section.php?id=4735 9/12/2005
r
Title 20 ZONING CODE Page 1 of , 30
(15) Shipping Containers. No person shall place or cause to 5e placed any
shipping container on any property located within this zone. (Ord. 2754 § 4, 2003;
Ord. 2704 § 1, 2001; Ord. 2683 § 4, 2001; Ord. 2525 § 1, 1997; Ord. 2507 § 2,
1997; Ord. 2513 § 1 (Aft. A § 2), 1997; Ord. 2454 § 1, 1995; Ord. 2316 § 1, 1992;
Ord. 2212 § 1, 1989; Ord. 2196 § 2, 1989; Ord. 2147 Exh. A, 1987).
•
http://www.mrsc.org/mc/puyallup/Puya1120.html 9/12/2005
PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING
SIGN IN SHEETS
Meeting Date: JL7fos
Subjects:
SUBJ. OF INTEREST: NAME ADDRESS / E-MAIL PHONE NO.
1) r -ems , 96Vs s 232,�� S Zu6-Q3� .66f,
/3ANr-sjAJ"7 L Q v n,-,
sc25z SP-
Ll r0`t Z-
4) z-77 17 -i o 6 A vt S�2
Z4 J $� 5z-1 131
" kEnri � $O�ZjV
1�A w�v t,✓��
rc)
/r,"e 3 3
• 6) PI .�A a tart- A 771 3(a AVF
s2, Rio
7) tt R,%er r Y C�, ;3/0LL 112-4 P/ 5'6 2-0(1
SR �jr- rs K cJPr qS?631 779-20�3
a)
9)
10)
11)
12)
S:1Permit P1anlPlanning Committee120041StaffReports PlanningEconomicCommitteeSigninSheets.doc
(Revised 3115104)
CITY OF KENT
OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
A -,SUBJECT: Planning and Econ. Dev. Committee Agenda Pkts Sent on 10/12/05.
TO: Brenda Jacober, City Clerk
FROM Pa la Mottram SIGNATURE ;aa.xcea 4 V4&u w
Copies of the 10/ !OS PLANNING &ECON DEV COMMITTEE Agenda Packets were distributed as follows _
s f F ~z e.y C u( e "< "_.�..
-TO e r A. ap, .' i�,:l 4,T$£ c �y :
City Council Members- Full Packet*(7) Deliver to City Clerk's Office—(7) Hard Pam Mottram
Tim C, JUIIeP, BruceW, RonH, LesT,DeborahR,DebbieRaplee Copies) in Cncl Mmbers Mail Boxes
TomB, RobertN, FredS, Charlene A, KimM, Gloria GouldWessen, Email Note: Distribute Hard Copies to: Pam Mottram
BrendaJacober, Bill Osborne, KimP, ReneeC Full Packet—(10) FS/CA/KP/RC/BJ >'(5)—hd copies)
Web Page —Mary Simmons Agenda &Full Packet Email: Front Page Mary Simmons
King County Journal Place in Box @-City Clerks- Full Packet FAX: 9-872-6611 >>Agenda Pam Mottram
Kent Reporter, Morris Malakoff Agenda EMAIL:morris.malakoff@repor(ernewspaperscom Pam Mottram
Marcelle Pechler,, Chamber of Commerce XtfaPec9flsY Email: Mpechler a(�kentchamber.corn Pam Mottram
Garrett Huffman, SK%Mgr 425451-792DEA236 uL.Rec7tet' Email: ghuffman@mbaks.com Pam Mottram
Master Blders Assoc, 335 1161h Ave SE, Bellevue,WA 98004
Don Shaffer,KentCARE.S,2070North 7e St,Seattle,WA98103 FifO�ael2r SMail (1)
William T. Miller, 827 W.Valley Hwy#95, Kent 98032 Agenda US Mail (KBAB) Pam Mottram
Michael D. Manderville, 11415 SE 196 , Renton 98055 Agenda US Mail (KBAB) Pam Mottram
Ryan Zulauf, 24502 98 Ave. S., Kent 98030 Agenda US Mail Pam Mottram
Jennifer Gorman/Warren Perkins Agenda Email: warren.perkins@gwest.com Pam Mottram
Owest Communications,23315 66th Ave S, Kent WA 98032
JStorment„EdCrawford,LBlanchard, GGill, MGillespie, JHodgson, Email: Pam Mottram
BLopez,RGivens,KSenecaut, KSprotbery, MayorWhite, A Ua4in,f
BColeman, BHutchinson, NTorgelson, TWhite, JSchneider,
MHubner, SMullen, LFlemm, BBilodeau, CHolden,JMorrow, AGENDAS (37)
CBarry, SHeiserman, MGilbert, CHankins, KHanson, DHooper,J-
Immacolato, LMoorehead, �4(16 pwt&uknY
LUPB Members: Jon Johnson, Dana Ralph, Kenneth Wendling, Email AGENDAS (7)
Steve Dowell, Tim Gimenez, David Malik, Elizabeth Watson
Seattle Post Intelligencer(P.I.) Agenda Email.citvdesk(a)seattlepi.com Pam Mottram
Kelly Snyder, Roth Hill Engineering Agenda Email: ksnyder .rothhill.com Pam Mottram
Pam Cobley, Roth Hill Engineering Agenda Email: pcobley@rothhill.com Pam Mottram
14450 NE 291h Pl, Suite 101, Bellevue, WA 98007
Shaunta Hyde, The Boeing Co., 206-655-3640 Agenda Email: shaunta.r.hyde6EDboeing.com Pam Mottram
Local Gvmt Relations Mgr. POB 3707 MC 14-49, Sea, WA 98124
Ted Nixon, Campbell/Nixon Assoc. Agenda Email:ten@cn-architects.com Pam Mottram
10024 SE 240th, Suite 102, Kent 98031
Doug Corbin,Puget Sound Energy, Agenda Email::douglas.corbin(ci)pse.com Pam Mottram
3130 S 38th St.,TAC-ANX,Tacoma,WA 98409 PH:1-800-32141231395-6867
Lobby of City Hall Agenda POST Pam Mottram
Kent .Downtown Partnership PO Box 557,Kent,WA98035. Agenda Email: kdpto'-kentdowntown.org Pam Mottram
(Jacquie Alexander) Ph:253-813-6976
Sam Pace, Seattle K.C.Assoc of Realtors, 12015 115 th Agenda Mail:
Ave. NE, Suite 195, Kirkland,WA 98034 (Hsg Specialist) Ph:
David Hoffman; 2533445 Ave S, Kent, 98032 4223 Agenda Email: David.W.Hoffmanaa Boeing.com Pam Mottram
(KBAB) Hm:253-852-4683 Wk:253-773-2861
Melvin L. Roberts, 9421 S.241s St., Kent 98031 Agenda Email: Melvin.L.Roberts&Boeing.com Pam Mottram
(KBAB) Hm: 253-854-0952 Wk:425-865-3695
Jacob W. Grob, 5408 S. 236 St., Kent 98032-3389 Agenda Email: Jacob.W.Grob aaBoeinc com Pam Mottram
(KBAB) Hm: 253-813-3809 Wk:425-234-2664
Steven M. Nuss, 26220 42no Ave. S, Kent, 98032 Agenda Email: SteveNuss(a)RedDotCorp.com Pam Mottram
(KBAB) Hm:253-854-7561
Thomas Hale, 23327 115 PI SE, Kent 98031-3426 Agenda Email: sthale2acomcast.net Pam Mottram
(KBAB) Hm:253-854-0734
Aaron Renner, (KBAB) Kent, WA 98032 Agenda Email: aaron rennera-yahoo.com Pam Mottram
13 Full Packets 2 for Mtg (7 Original Lterhd Agda Covers for CC)4 Hd copy Agdas (Revised 10105) S:1PermitlPlanlPlanning Committee120051DistributionlPC-distribution101705.doc
Miattram, Pamela
m; Pamela
Thursday,
hurs
t; Thursdaa y, October 13, 2005 10:00 AM
fo Warren Perkins, Qwest Communications; Corbin, Doug; Puget Sound Energy; Dana Ralph
(Theralphs4@msn.com); David Malik (dpmalik@hotmail.com); Elizabeth Watson; Garrett
Huffman, SKC Mgr; Jon Johnson (jonkjohnson@attbi.com); Kenneth Wendling
(kenwendling@hotmail.com); Kent Downtown Partnership (Jacquie Alexander); Morris
Malakoff, Kent Reporter Newspaper; Pam Cobley, Roth Hill Engineering; Renner, Aaron T. ,
KBAB; Seattle Post Intelligencer(P.I.); Snyder, Kelly Roth Hill Engr; Steve Dowell (dowell16
@msn.com); Ted Nixon; Tim Gimenez, LUPB; White, Tammy; Adams Pratt, Kim; Asst City
Attorney; Anderson, Charlene; Planning Manager; Barry, Cathy, Admin Sec., Planning
Services; Bilodeau, Bernie Admin Secretary, Planning; Bockelie, Marit; Brubaker, Tom, City
Attorney; Cameron, Renee; Civil Legal Assistant; City Council; Coleman, Bonnie; Crawford,
Ed; Flemm, Lori; Gilbert, Matt, Planning Services; Gill, Gary; Gillespie, Mike, Development
Mgr, PW; Givens, Rosalie; Gould-Wessen, Gloria; Grob, Jacob W. KBAB; Hale, Thomas
KBAB; Hankins, Chris, Planning Services; Hanson, Kurt, Planning Services; Heiserman, Steve
Prod. Assist. Multimedia; Hodgson, John; Hoffman, David KBAB; Holden, Chris, Admin
Secretary, Planning Services; Hooper, Damien, Planning Services; Hubner, Mike; Hutchinson,
Robert; Jacober, Brenda; City Clerk; Larry Blanchard, PW Director; Lopez, Barbara;
Marousek, Kim; Principal Planner; Mary Simmons, City Clerk's Office; Michael Hubner,
Suburban Cities Consultant, Planning Services; Moorehead, Lydia; Morrow, Judy, Admin Sec.,
Planning Services; Mullen, Steve Transp Engr Mgr; Nachlinger, Robert; Nuss, Steven M
KBAB; Osborne, William; Planner; Pechler, Marcelle- Kent Chamber of Commerce; Peterson,
Kelly; Pulliam, Julie; Roberts, Melvin L KBAB; Satterstrom, Fred; CD Director; Schneider,
Jim; Senecaut, Kathleen; Shaunta Hyde, the Boeing Co.; Sprotbery, Kevin; Storment, Jim;
Thomas A. Goeltz; Torgelson, Nathan; White, Jim
Cc: Ty Peterson, City of Maple Valley; B. Sokol, City of Kenmore; D. Stroh, City of Bellevue; David
Delph, Planning/PW/Emerg Mgmt Dir. City of Covington; E. Shields, City of Kirkland; Jack
Pace, City of Tukwila; Joe Tovar, Planning Mgr/Assist City Mgr- City of Covington; Judith
Kilgore, City of Des Moines; Kathy McClung; Linda Bentley, Sr. Planner, City of Normandy
Park; M. Iken, City of Newcastle; Mark H., City of Issaquah; Paul Krauss, City of Auburn; Paul
Reitenbach; R. Lewandowski, City of Redmond; R. Odle, City of Redmond, WA; Richard Hart,
City of Mercer-Island; Stephanie Warden; Steve Butler; Rebecca Lind; Yvonne Gilmore;
Andrea McNamara (for Teufel Properties)w/D.W.T.; Andrew Sheridan; Bernadette Epstein;
Bill Applegate; Bill Dubay, King County Metro; Bob Anderson; Bob Ruddell, John L. Scott
Realty; Candace Anderson; Cooke, Suzette; Curtis Schuster, John L. Scott Realty; Dara
O'Byrne, Futurewise; Debra Prins, King County Metro; Don Leabo, Urban Density P R; Edina
Blackstock; Elissabeth Bohannon; Greg Bell; Jackie and Michael Marchefka; Jag Basra, Al
Construction; Janet Sullins; Jeff Wilson; Karen Warren; Katherine Laird, Century Pacific, LP;
Kathleen Ekstrand; Kim Goodridge; Larry Teufel; Lyn & Mary Johnson; Lyn Johnson; Mary J.
Tahlequah; Michael & Ingrid McLendon; Michelle McDowell; Mike Flynn, WA Association of
Realtors; Paul Clements; Pete Lymberis, Urban Density P of R; Peter Lee
(petercclee@verison.com); Rajend &Aruna Gounder; RF Bruan; Rob Kader; Sara Thompson;
Sergey I. Golubovich, Urban Density P of R; Sheila McGraw, John L. Scott; Sheryl Small;
Sonia Binek; Stephen Hansen, Cargo Containers; Steve Elwell; Steven Verne; Sydney
McComas, Future Wise; Teresa and Mark Davis; Tim Trohimovich, Futurewise; Ty
Pendergraft; Walter Fitzgerald; WeiJayne Fujimoto;Al Hurt; Alan Stuckey& Marilyn
Schultheis; Brian Gilmore; Chuck Kasowski; Curt Newell; Danton Hicks; Don & Nancy Maio;
Ed Fitzhugh, Boeing Co; Elizabeth Howe; Gene Rosso &Anthony(Tony) Rosso; Jim Fox; Jim
Goodgion; John &Jane Estes; John Zilavy, Future Wise (1000 Friends); Laporte, Tim; Len
Johnke; Leona Orr; Mark Kuolt; Noelle Rogerson; Ranniger, Deborah; Ric & Kristy Herrick;
Roger Duncan; Ron &Carole Novak; Satwant Singh; Suzette Cooke; Tom Sharp
Subject: PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING -AGENDA
Importance: High
II Parties:
the full packet is too large for attachment, please find ATTACHED the AGENDA for the upcoming Planning and
Economic Development Committee scheduled for Monday, October 17, 2005.
1 10/13/2005 10:00 AM
10:00 AM
_- .
Tf you would like to receive a copy of the full agenda packet please contact myself or the respective planner or view this
material on the city of kent's web site.
• En
PEDC_Agenda_101
705.pdf(109 KB...
Sincerely,
P� uB a A. MCt (rl'w_
�dw�LwLsrvotive Seevetar�✓
�h n vi L��ct services
t-w-OL: pvw.0'�C'r"q Vvt. CL.I2°wt.WG1.u5
2 10/13/2005 10:00 AM
10:00 AM
r`
Mottram, Pamela
cistribution List Name: Urban Density Parties of Record
ategories: Parties of Record
Members:
Al Hurt alhurt@wwdb.org
Alan Stuckey & Marilyn Schultheis stuckeyhome@cs.com
Andrea McNamara (for Teufel Properties)w/D.W.T.
andreamcnamara@dwt.com
Andrew Sheridan everfree4u@yahoo.com
Bernadette Epstein bepstein@juno.com
Bill Applegate bapplegatel @msn.com
Bill Dubay, King County Metro bill.dubay@metrokc.gov
Bob Anderson bobpencl4@msn.com
Bob Ruddell, John L. Scott Realty bobru@johnlscott.com
Brian Gilmore brrg3@worldnet.att.net
Candace Anderson redbarn@foxinternet.net
Chuck Kasowski chuckl 1315@msn.com
Cooke, Suzette suzette@suzettecooke.org
Curt Newell three-rings@comcast.net
Curtis Schuster, John L. Scott Realty
battlecat@msn.com
Danton Hicks techsoftl @comcast.net
Dara O'Byrne, Futurewise dara@futurewise.org
*Debra Prins, King County Metro debra.prins@metrokc.gov
n & Nancy Maio nancy6342001 @yahoo.com
n Leabo, Urban Density P R donleabo@hotmail.com
Ed Fitzhugh, Boeing Co j_edwinfitzhugh_ii@boeing.com
Edina Blackstock blackstock4@comcast.net
Elissabeth Bohannon b.a.bohannon@comcast.net
Elizabeth Howe betsyhowe@comcast.net
Gene Rosso & Anthony(Tony) Rosso anthonyrosso@msn.com
Greg Bell twinplastics@quest.net
Jackie and Michael Marchefka jackieMikeM@msn.com
Jag Basra, Al Construction jab@basra.us
Janet Sullins jannets@comcast.net
Jeff Wilson jkgkwilson@hotmaiLcom
Jim Fox jim@foxelectric.net
Jim Goodgion jim_goodgion@mikronvinyl.com
John &Jane Estes jestesl @gwest.net
John Zilavy, Future Wise (1000 Friends)
johnz@futurewise.org
Karen Warren rgkwarren@highstream.net
Katherine Laird, Century Pacific, LP katherineLaird@DWT.COM
Kathleen Ekstrand lakestrand@comcast.net
Kim Goodridge kimgo@johnlscott.com
Laporte, Tim TLaporte@ci.kent.wa.us
Larry Teufel larryt@teufel.com
Len Johnke lijohnke@mansonconstruction.com
Leona Orr I.orr@comcast.net
Lyn & Mary Johnson lynandmary@comcast.net
Lyn Johnson lyn.a.johnson@boeing.com
Mlk Kuolt mkuolt@gensco.com
WJ. Tahlequah tthealing@aol.com
el & Ingrid McLendon ingrid_mclendon@comcast.net
Michelle McDowell michellemcdowell@comcast.net
1 10/5/2005 3:33 PM
3:33 PM
,►Mike-frlynn, WA Association of Realtors
mflynn@warealtor.com
Noelle Rogerson alderacre@hotmail.com
*m Cobley, Roth Hill Engineering pcobley@rothhill.com
ul Clements paulc@tristatecon.com
ete Lymberis, Urban Density P of R pete.lymberis@quadranthomes.com
Peter Lee (petercclee@verison.com) petercclee@verison.com
Rajend &Aruna Gounder jaykrishanl@comcast.net
Ranniger, Deborah DRanniger@ci.kent.wa.us
RF Bruan rzbruan@worldnet.att.net
Ric & Kristy Herrick herrickhome@comcast.net
Rob Kader RLKader@msn.com
Roger Duncan roger.a.duncan@boeing.com
Ron & Carole Novak rpncsn@yahoo.com
Sara Thompson shompson@windermere.com
Satwant Singh singh@prudentialmvr.com
Sergey I. Golubovich, Urban Density P of R
sergeyig@hotmaiLcom
Sheila McGraw, John L. Scott smcgraw@johnlscott.com
Sheryl Small drsmall_dc@yahoo.com
Sonia Binek sbinek@triadassoc.com
Stephen Hansen, Cargo Containers hansenkent@msn.com
Steve Elwell selwell@tissuelink.com
Steven Verne Steven@verne.org
Suzette Cooke suzettecooke@msn.com
Sydney McComas, Future Wise sydneym@futurewise.org
Ted Nixon ten@cn-architects.com
Teresa and Mark Davis teresad59@aol.com
Thomas A. Goeltz, DWT (Urban Density)
Thomasgoeltz@dwt.com
Tim Trohimovich, Futurewise tim@futurewise.org
m Sharp jsts@comcast.net
Pendergraft typender@comcast.net
alter Fitzgerald bigwally59@hotmaiLcom
WeiJayne Fujimoto wjfujimoto@hotmail.com
Yvonne Gilmore yvonne@westrivercap.com
9
2 10/5/2005 3:33 PM
3:33 PM
c5lz #S
URBAN DENSITY NOTEBOOK RECIPIENTS (Revised 9/12/05)
PUBLIC WORKS: Gary Gill
Larry Blanchard
PARKS DEPT: Y Lori Flemm
PLANNING SERVICES: V Gloria Gould-Wessen
Kim Marousek
Bill Osborne
Charlene Anderson
LEGAL DEPT: im Adams Pratt
MISCELLANEOUS: CITY COUNCIL REVIEW - NOTEBOOK
PUBLIC REVIEW - NOTEBOOK
FUTUREWISE
(FORMERLY—"1000 FRIENDS")- FOLDER
LAND USE & PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS: Jon Johnso
Tim Gime ez
Elizabe Watson
bana,Palph
Da d Malik
Steve Dowell
enneth Wendlin
(1) FutureW ise/Lawsuit File - (formerly—"1000 Friends") -
Folder
4 Extra Sets Material - Folder
3-Hole Punch the notebookpackets: "24" Place respective sets of material in appropriate folders
P:\Planning\2002 Comp Plan Update\Lfrban Density\UrbanDensityNotebookRecipients.doc