Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Council Committees - Planning and Economic Development Committee - 02/19/2002
4iWENT " '"Gro" PLANNING COMMITTEE ct DEVEL4PMEW, Fred N.Satteratrortr,Ate February 19, 2002 Director PL.ANNING',SERVICES Charlene Anderson,AICP Manager Malft Address.. The City Council Planning Committee will meet in Council Chambers East, Kent 220 Fourth Ave.',S, City Hall, 220 4 Avenue South, at 3:00 PM on Tuesday, February 19, 2002. Kent,WA98=-5895 Location Addddresss 4UU West Gowe Kent,WA 98tt32 Committee Members: Leona Orr, Chair Judy Woods Bruce White Phone:253-856-5454 Fax:253-856.6454 Action Sneaker Time 1. Approval of Minutes of November 5, 2001 YES 2. Public Works Trust Fund Loan Agreement YES Don Wickstrom 05 min 3. Mobile Home Park Relocation Assistance NO Bill Osborne 05 min 4. Townhouse Zoning Process NO Charlene Anderson 05 min 5. Public Participation Process NO Charlene Anderson 15 min 6. Buildable Lands & Targets— Status Report NO Michael Hubner 30 min The Planning Committee meets the third Tuesday of each month at 3:00 PM in Chambers East, Kent City Hall, 220 4'Ave. South, unless otherwise noted. For agenda information please call Jackie Bicknell at (253) 856-5712. ANY PERSON REQUIRING A DISABILITY ACCOMMODATION SHOULD CONTACT THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE AT(253)856-5725IN ADVANCE. FOR TDD RELAY SERVICE CALL -800-833-6388. THE WASHINGTON TELECOMMUNICATIONS RELAY SERVICE AT 1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Don E. Wickstrom, P.E. Public Works Director • Phone:253-856-5500 \S7KE1 T Fax: 253-856-6500 WASHINGTON Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent,WA 98032-5895 Date : February 19, 2002 To: PlaainiI g Committee , From: Do ir kstrom, Public Works Director Subject : Public Works Trust Fund Loan Agreement #PW-02-691-024 Due to time constraints and because the next Public Works Committee meeting is March 4th, this item has been placed on the Planning Committee agenda. We are in receipt of a Public Works Trust Fund (PWTF) Loan Agreement between Kent and the Public Works Board for the Tacoma Second Supply Project . This is a 20 year loan in the amount of $10, 000, 000 . 00 at an interest rate of 1/2%. The agreement will be executed if and when the Legislature passes and the Governor signs the bill which authorizes the loans . We are requesting the Committee ' s recommendation that the Mayor be authorized to sign the PWTF Loan Agreement . MOTION: Recommend authorizing the Mayor to sign the Public Works Trust Fund Loan Agreement upon concurrence of the language therein by the City Attorney and the Public Works Director. • PWTF02 PUBLIC WORKS TRUST FUND CONSTRUCTION LOAN AGREEMENT NUMBER PW-02-691-024 CITY OF KENT PART I: ENTIRE AGREEMENT This agreement, and incorporated attachments, contains all terms and conditions agreed to by the PUBLIC WORKS BOARD and the LOCAL GOVERNMENT and no other statements or representations written or oral,shall be deemed a part thereof. This contract consists of ten pages and two attachments. An attachment to this agreement, ATTACEMENT I: SCOPE OF WORK, consists of a description of local project activities, certification of the project's useful life, and identification of estimated project costs and fund sources and is, by this reference, incorporated into this agreement as though set forth fully herein. In addition, ATTACHMENT H: ATTORNEYS CERTIFICATION,is by this reference incorporated into this agreement. The PUBLIC WORKS BOARD and the LOCAL GOVERNMENT have executed this agreement as of the date and year last written below. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY, LOCAL GOVERNMENT TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Steve Wells Name Director,Local Government Division Title Title Date Date APPROVED AS TO FORM ONLY This 9th Day of January,2002 Christine 0. Gregoire Federal Taxpayer Identification Number Attorney General By Signature on File Jeanne A. Cushman Assistant Attorney General Page 1 2001 PWTF Construction Loan Agreement CTED Contract Number KENT PART 11: INTRODUCTION This loan agreement is made and entered into by and between the PUBLIC WORKS BOARD, or its successor, (referred to as the "BOARD"), a department of the state of Washington, and CITY OF KENT (referred to as the"LOCAL GOVERNMENT"). Acting under the authority of Chapter 43.155 RCW, the BOARD has selected the LOCAL GOVERNMENT to receive a Public Works Trust Fund loan for an approved public works project. PART HE PURPOSE The BOARD and the LOCAL GOVERNMENT have entered into this agreement to undertake a local public works project that fiuthers the goals and objectives of the Washington State Public Works Trust Fund Program. The project will be undertaken by the LOCAL GOVERNMENT and will include the activities described in ATTACHMENT I: SCOPE OF WORK. The project must be undertaken in accordance with PART IV: TERMS AND CONDITIONS, and all applicable state and local laws and ordinances, which by this reference are incorporated into this agreement as though set forth fully herein. PART IV: TERMS AND CONDITIONS The parties to this agreement agree as follows: • 4.01 Rate and Term of Loan The BOARD, using funds appropriated from the Public Works Assistance Account, shall loan the LOCAL GOVERNMENT a sum not to exceed $10,000,000.00. The interest rate shall be.one-half percent (1/2%) per annum on the outstanding principal balance. The-tenn of the loan shall not exceed 20 years, with the final payment due July 1,2022. 4.02 Local Project Share The LOCAL GOVERNMENT pledges an amount of locally-generated revenue not less than fifteen percent (15%) of the total eligible portion of the project cost not funded by federal or state grants as identified in ATTACHMENT I: SCOPE OF WORK, to be verified at the time of project close-out. Any change in the percentage of locally-generated funds may require an adjustment in the loan amount or interest rate charged, or both. In such event, the LOCAL GOVERNMENT agrees to execute an amendment to this agreement adjusting the loan amount or interest rate,as appropriate. Local project share must consist of expenditures eligible under WAC 399-30-030(3) and be related only to project activities described in ATTACHIAIENT I: SCOPE OF WORK. These expenditures may be made up to twelve (12) months prior to the execution of the loan agreement and verified at the time of project close-out. PUBLIC WORKS TRUST FUND MONIES MAY NOT BE USED TO REIMBURSE THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT FOR ANY COSTS INCURRED PRIOR TO EXECUTION OF THIS LOAN AGREEMENT. Page 2 2001 PWTF Construction Loan Agreement CTED Contract Number KENT 4.03 Disbursement of Loan Proceeds The availability of funds in the Public Works Assistance Account is a function of tax collection and loan repayment. If funds are not available at the time the invoice is submitted, or when the agreement is executed, the issuance of warrants will be delayed. Therefore, subject to the availability of funds,warrants shall be issued to the LOCAL GOVERNMENT for payment of allowable expenses incurred by the LOCAL GOVERNMENT while undertaking and administering approved project activities in accordance with ATTACHMENT I: SCOPE OF WORK. In no event shall the total Public Works Trust Fund loan exceed eighty five percent (85%) of the eligible actual project costs. The disbursement of loan proceeds shall be initiated by the LOCAL GOVERNMENT on a Washington State Invoice Voucher form. The loan fiords will be disbursed to the LOCAL GOVERNMENT as follows: Within thirty(30)days of the formal execution of this agreement, a sum not to exceed fifteen percent(15%) of the approved Public Works Trust Fund loan shall be disbursed to the LOCAL GOVERNMENT. Within thirty (30) days of the execution of a Notice to Proceed which follows the formal award of a construction contract, a sum not to exceed eighty percent (80%) of the approved Public Works Trust Fund loan shall be disbursed to the LOCAL GOVERNMENT, except in the case of engineering services contracts. If the approved project described in ATTACHMENT I: SCOPE OF WORK is solely for the completion of engineering studies,a sum not to exceed eighty percent(80%)of the approved Public Works Trust Fund loan shall be disbursed to the LOCAL GOVERNMENT within thirty(30) days of the execution of a Notice to Proceed following the formal award of a contract for engineering services. At the time of project completion, a Close-out Report, (refer to Section 4.19 for Close-out Report), shall be submitted to the BOARD by the LOCAL GOVERNMENT certifying total actual project costs. The final Public Works Trust Fund loan disbursement shall not bring the total loan in excess of eighty five percent(85%) of the eligible project costs or the total of$10,000,000.00 whichever is less. The Close-out Report shall serve as a contract AMENDMENT for determining the final loan amount, interest rate, and local share. In the event that the final costs identified in the Close-out Report indicate that the LOCAL GOVERNMENT has received Public Works Trust Fund monies in excess of eighty five percent (85%) of eligible costs, all funds in excess of eighty five percent(85%) shall be repaid to the Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development,or its successor,within thirty(30)days of submission of the Close-out Report. 4.04 Interest Earned on Public Works Trust Fund Monies All interest earned on Public Works Trust Fund Monies held by the LOCAL GOVERNMENT shall accrue to the benefit of the LOCAL GOVERNMENT and be applied to the eligible costs of the approved project. Benefits shall accrue in one of two ways: 1. Reduce the amount of the Public Works Trust Fund loan. 2. Pay any part of eligible project costs that are in excess of ATTACHMENT I: SCOPE OF WORK estimates,if there is an overrun of project costs. i Page 3 2001 PWTF Construction Loan Agreement CTED Contract Number KENT The LOCAL GOVERNMENT shall establish procedures to ensure that all monies received from the Public Works Trust Fund loan can be readily identified and accounted for at any time during the life of this loan agreement. Such procedures shall consist of the establishment of a separate fiord, account, sub-account or any other method meeting generally accepted accounting principles. 4.05 Time of Performance The LOCAL GOVERNMENT shall begin the activities identified within ATTACHMENT I: SCOPE OF WORK no later than three months after loan agreement execution, and reach project completion no later than forty-eight(48)months after the date of agreement execution. Failure to perform within the time frame described in the preceding paragraph may constitute default of this agreement and require the immediate repayment of any loan funds disbursed. hi the event of extenuating circumstances,the LOCAL GOVERNMENT may request, in writing,that the BOARD extend the deadline for project completion. The BOARD may,by a two-thirds vote,extend the deadline. The term of this agreement shall be for the entire term of the loan,irrespective of actual project completion, unless terminated sooner as provided herein. 4.06 Repayment The first loan repayment under this agreement is due July 1, 2003, and subsequent installments are due on July 1 of each year during the term of the loan. The first repayment under this agreement shall consist of interest only at the rate of one-half percent (1/2%) per annum, calculated on a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months,applied to funds received. Interest will begin to accrue from the date each warrant is issued to the LOCAL GOVERNMENT. Subsequent repayments shall consist of the principal balance due divided by the loan tern remaining plus interest on the unpaid balance of the loan. The final payment shall be an amount sufficient to bring the loan balance to zero. The LOCAL GOVERNMENT has the right to repay the unpaid balance of the loan in full at any time, and the right to repay at a faster rate than is provided in this agreement, provided that any such payment must equal or exceed the principal amount normally due on an annual basis. Page 4 2001 PWTF Construction Loan Agreement CTED Contract Number KENT The LOCAL GOVERNMENT will repay the loan in accordance with the preceding conditions through the use of a check, money order, or equivalent means made payable to the Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development,or its successor,and sent to: Department of Community,Trade and Economic Development Administrative Services Division/Fiscal Unit 906 Columbia Street S.W. P.O.Box 48300 Olympia,Washington 98504-8300 4.07 Repayment Account The LOCAL GOVERNMENT shall repay the loan according to the option designated in Section 4.09 Loan Security.The name of the fund,account,or sub-account shall be 4.08 Default in Repayment Loan repayments shall be made on the loan in accordance with Section 4.06 of this agreement. A payment not received within thirty (30) days of the due date shall be declared delinquent. Delinquent payments shall be assessed a daily penalty beginning on the thirty-first (31) day past the due date. The penalty will be assessed on the entire payment amount. The penalty will be twelve percent (12%) per annum calculated on a 360-day year. Upon default in the payment of any annual installment, the BOARD may declare the entire remaining balance of the loan, together with interest accrued, immediately due and payable.Failure to exercise its option with respect to any such repayment in default shall not constitute a waiver by the BOARD to exercise such option for any succeeding installment payment which may then be in default. The LOCAL GOVERNMENT shall pay the costs and reasonable legal fees incurred by the BOARD in any action undertaken to enforce its rights under this section. The same penalty terms shall apply to delinquent repayment of funds paid in excess of eligible costs as provided for in Section 4.03. Page 5 2001 PWTF Construction Loan Agreement CTED Contract Number KENT 4 09 Loan Security The LOCAL GOVERNMENT must select one of the following options for securing repayment of the loan. Please initial the appropriate option. 1, General Obligation: This loan is a general obligation of the LOCAL GOVERNMENT. OR 2. Revenue Obligation: This option may be used only if the entire project is a domestic water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer or solid waste utility project. LOCAL GOVERNMENTS performing a storm sewer project that have not created a storm sewer utility or a combined sanitary sewer/storm sewer utility may not use this option. Projects providing for a mixture of bridge, road, domestic water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer activities may not use this option. This loan is a revenue obligation of the LOCAL GOVERNMENT payable solely from the net revenue of the utility system indicated below. Payments shall be made from the net revenue of the utility after the payment of the principal and interest on any revenue bonds, notes, warrants or other obligations of the Utility having a lien on that net revenue. As used here, "net revenue" means gross revenue minus expenses of maintenance and operations. The BOARD grants the LOCAL GOVERNMENT the right to issue future bonds and notes that constitute a lien and charge on net revenue superior to the lien and charge of this loan agreement. Please choose and initial one of the following utility systems: Water Sanitary Sewer(Wastewater) Stormwater Water/Sanitary Sewer Stormwater/Sanitary Sewer Solid Waste OR 3, Local Improvement District: Pursuant to RCW 35.51.050, the LOCAL GOVERNMENT pledges to repay this loan from assessments collected from a Local Improvement District, Local Utility District or other similar special assessment district in which the improvements financed by this loan are located. The name of the special assessment district is Nothing in this section shall absolve the LOCAL GOVERNMENT of its obligation to make loan repayments when due, and to adjust rates, fees, or surcharges, if necessary, to meet its obligations under this agreement. Page 6 2001 PWTF Construction Loan Agreement CTED Contract Number KENT 4 10 RecordkeeyinQ and Access to Records The BOARD,the BOARD's agents, and duly authorized officials of the State shall have fu11 access and the right to examine, copy, excerpt, or transcribe any pertinent documents, papers, records, and books of the LOCAL GOVERNMENT and of persons,firms,or organizations with which the LOCAL GOVERNMENT may contract,involving transactions related to this project and this agreement. The LOCAL GOVERNMENT agrees to retain all records pertaining to this project and this agreement for a period of six years from the date of project close-out. If any litigation, claim or audit is started before the expiration of the six year period, the records shall be retained until all litigation, claims, or audit findings involving the records have been resolved. 4.11 Reports The LOCAL GOVERNMENT, at such times and on such forms as the BOARD may require, shall furnish the BOARD with such periodic reports as it may request pertaining to the activities undertaken pursuant to this agreement including,but not limited to, quarterly progress reports,the Close-Out Report, and any other matters covered by this agreement. Failure to file periodic reports as requested may result in termination of this agreement as per Section 4.14. 4.12 Indemnification The LOCAL GOVERNMENT will defend, protect, indemnify, save, and hold harmless the BOARD, and the state of Washington from and against any and all claims,costs,damages, expenses, or liability for any or all injuries to persons or tangible property, arising from the acts or omissions of the LOCAL GOVERNMENT or any of its contractors or subcontractors, or any employees or agents in the performance of this agreement, however caused. In the case of negligence of both the BOARD and the LOCAL GOVERNMENT, any damages allowed shall be levied in proportion to the percentage of negligence attributable to each party. 4.13 Amendments Modifications and Waivers Except for an increase in the amount of the loan governed by this agreement,the LOCAL GOVERNMENT may request an amendment to this agreement for the purpose of modifying the SCOPE OF WORK or for extending the time of performance as provided for in Section 4.05. No modification or amendment resulting in an extension of time shall take effect until a request in writing has been received and approved by the BOARD in accordance with Section 4.05. No amendment or modification shall take effect until approved in writing by both the BOARD and the LOCAL GOVERNMENT and attached hereto. No conditions or provisions of this agreement may be waived unless approved by the BOARD in writing. 4.14 Termination for Cause If the LOCAL GOVERNMENT fails to comply with the terms of this agreement, or fails to use the loan proceeds only for those activities identified in ATTACHMENT I: SCOPE OF WORK, the BOARD may terminate the agreement in whole or in part at any time. The BOARD shall promptly notify the LOCAL GOVERNMENT in writing of its determination to terminate, the reason for such termination, and the effective date of the termination. Upon termination of the loan agreement, the BOARD may declare the entire remaining balance of the loan,together with any interest accrued,immediately due and payable. r Page 7 2001 PW'rF Construction Loan Agreement CTED Contract Number KENT 4.15 Termination For Convenience The BOARD may terminate this agreement in the event that federal or state funds are no longer available to the BOARD, or are not allocated for the purpose of meeting the BOARD'S obligations under this agreement. Termination will be effective when the BOARD sends written notice of termination to the LOCAL GOVERNMENT. 416 Governing Law and Venue This agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with,and the validity and performance hereof shall be governed by,the laws of the state of Washington. Venue of any suit between the parties arising out of this agreement shall be the Superior Court of Thurston County, Washington. The prevailing party is entitled to recover costs in accordance with Washington State Law(Chapter 4.84 RCW). 4.17 Severability If any provision under this agreement or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid by any court of rightful jurisdiction, this invalidity does not affect other provisions of the agreement which can be given effect without the invalid provision. 4.18 Project Completion The BOARD will require and notify the LOCAL GOVERNMENT to initiate a Close-out Report when the activities identified in ATTACHMENT I: SCOPE OF WORK are completed. In the report, the LOCAL GOVERNMENT will provide the following information to the BOARD: • 1. A certified statement of the actual dollar amounts spent, from all fund sources, in completing the project as described. 2. A certified statement that the project,as described in the Loan Agreement's Scope of Work,is complete and has been designed/constructed to required standards. 3. Certification that all costs associated with the project have been incurred. Costs are incurred when goods and services are received and/or contract work is performed. Page 8 2001 PWTF Construction Loan Agreement CTED Contract Number KENT 4 19 Project Close-Out In accordance with Section 4.03 of this agreement,the LOCAL GOVERNMENT will submit,together with the Close-out Report, a request for a sum not to exceed the final five percent(51/6)of the loan amount. This disbursement shall not occur prior to the completion of all project activities. The LOCAL GOVERNMENT shall be responsible to ensure that their contractor(s)are in compliance with the Department of Revenue and the Department of Labor&Industries requirements. 4.20 Audit Audits of the LOCAL GOVERNMENT'S project activities may be conducted by the Municipal Division of the State Auditor's Office in accordance with state law and any guidelines the Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development,or its successor,may prescribe. Payment for the audit shall be made by the LOCAL GOVERNMENT. 4.21 Proiect Sims If the LOCAL GOVERNMENT displays, during the period covered by this agreement, signs or markers identifying those agencies participating financially in the approved project,the sign or marker must identify the Washington State Public Works Trust Fund as a participant in the project. 4.22 Utilization of Minority and Women's Business Enterprises(MWBE) In accordance with legislative findings and policies set forth in Chapter 39.19 RCW, the BOARD encourages participation by Minority and Women's Business Enterprise firms certified by OMWBE., Voluntary goals for participation are: Construction/Public Works 10%MBE 6%WBE Architect/Engineering 10%MBE 6%WBE Purchased Goods 8%MBE 4%WBE Purchased Services 10%MBE 4%WBE Professional Services 10%MBE 4%WBE 4.23 Nondiscrimination Provision During the performance of this contract, the LOCAL GOVERNMENT shall comply with all federal and state nondiscrimination laws, including,but not limited to Chapter 49.60 RCW,Washington's Law Against Discrimination,and 42 U.S.C. 12101,et seq,the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA). In the event of the LOCAL GOVERNMENT'S noncompliance or refusal to comply with any applicable nondiscrimination law, regulation, or policy, this contract may be rescinded, canceled, or terminated in whole or in part,and the LOCAL GOVERNMENT may be declared ineligible for further contracts with the BOARD. The LOCAL GOVERNMENT shall, however,be given a reasonable time in which to cure this noncompliance. Page 9 2001 PWTF Construction Loan Agreement CTED Contract Number KENT 4.24 Historical and Cultural Artifacts The LOCAL GOVERNMENT agrees that if historical or cultural artifacts are discovered during construction, the LOCAL GOVERNMENT shall immediately stop construction and notify the local historical preservation officer and the state's historical preservation officer at the Washington State Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation. The LOCAL GOVERNMENT shall require this provision to be contained in all contracts for work or services related to ATTACHMENT ONE: SCOPE OF WORK. PART V: SPECIAL ASSURANCES The LOCAL GOVERNMENT assures compliance with all applicable state and local laws, requirements, and ordinances as they pertain to the design, implementation, and administration of the approved project: Of particular importance are the following: 5.01 RCW 43.155.060 The LOCAL GOVERNMENT shall comply with the provisions of RCW 43.155.060 regarding competitive bidding requirements for projects assisted in whole or in part with money from the Public Works Trust Fund program. 5.02 WAC 399-30-030(3) The LOCAL GOVERNMENT assures compliance with WAC 399-30-030(3)which identifies eligible costs for projects assisted with Public Works Trust Fund loans. 5.03 Assignment Neither this agreement nor any claims arising under this agreement, shall be transferred or assigned by the LOCAL GOVERNMENT without prior written consent of the BOARD. Page 10 2001 PWTF Construction Loan Agreement CTED Contract Number KENr PUBLIC WORKS TRUST FUND ATTACHMENT 1: SCOPE OF WORK PW-02-691-024 KENT TACOMA'S SECOND SUPPLY PIPELINE#5 1. Provide a clear description of the project to be financed in part by a Public Works Trust Fund loan: The project consists of installing all or a portion of approximately 42 miles of 48-72 inch diameter transmission main,metering stations and an additional storage project at the Howard Hanson Dam. The Second Supply Project elements include: 1. Green River Headworks Modifications (Replace and add to old 1913 river diversion facilities) • Anchor and raise the existing diversion dam 6.5 feet • Remove existing and construct new river intake • Construct fish bypass,channel,ladder,trap, sorting and haul facilities • Construct new Intake Building—storage and electrical/mechanical • Replace the 87 year old 700 foot long concrete supply pipeline with a new 96' diameter steel main • Fish habitat improvements in the dam pool area 2. Construct 34 mile long steel transmission main from the Green River Headworks to Tacoma (Main Branch of the Second Supply Pipeline) • Pipeline ranges from 48"to 72"in diameter • Has a nominal capacity of 72 MGD • Nine miles of the 34 miles has recently been constructed from Tacoma to Federal Way 3. Construct 8 mile long steel transmission main from the Main Branch to Seattle's Cedar River supply at Lake Youngs(North Branch of the Second Supply Pipeline) • Pipeline about 40"in diameter • Has a nominal capacity of 40 MGD 4. Develop additional storage at Howard Hanson Dam(Owned and operated by the Army Corps of Engineers)-All improvements mandated by either NMFS,USFWS or Army Corps of Engineers • New intake tower • Fish collection and transport facility for downstream passage • Three new buildings—administration,maintenance and generator • Remediation measure to reduce right abutment seepage • New access bridge • Numerous fish and wildlife habitat restoration/improvement features P:\shared\Project Typing\Merrill 20011Construction Scope.rtf Scope of Work Page Two (PW-02-691-024) 5. Construct and operate a fish restoration and rearing facility adjacent to Tacoma's Headworks facilities for the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe • Primary purpose to restore the natural Chinook runs in the upper Green River Watershed • Secondary purpose to produce additional on-site planning of Coho for harvest • Includes natural rearing features 6. Construct additional or new water treatment facilities • Additional flouride treatment facilities at Tacoma's Headworks • New corrosion control facility near Lake Sawyer • New chlorine disinfection facility just west of Tacoma's Headworks 7. Numerous small fish and wildlife habitat improvement/enhancement projects such as: • Remove barriers to fish passage • Special plantings for wildlife foraging • Addition of gravel and large woody debris to the streams • Hanson Dam and Tacoma Diversion Dam fish passage and handling mentioned above. 2. The term of this loan will be based on an engineer's certification of the expected useful life of the improvements, as stated below, or 20 years,whichever is less. If the local government prefers the term of its loan to be less than either 20 years or the useful life of the improvements,the preferred loan term should be indicated: 20 years. 3. I, Don E.Wickstrom.P.E. , licensed engineer, certify that the average expected useful life for the improvements described above is 100 years. Signed: �"A��n Date: l bn�D Telephone: (253) 856-5500 D � JAN 2 4 2002 • P:\shared\Projec Typing\Merrill 2001\Construction Scope.rtf Scope of Work Page Three (PW-02-691-024) Estimated Project Costs: Total Costs Engineering $ 2,230,000 Environmental Review $ 500,000 Land/R-O-W Acquisition $ 240,000 Public Involvement/Information $ Other Fees $ 930,000 Construction $ 19,900,000 Construction Inspection $ 1,500,000 Contingency( 13%) $ 2,700,000 1.Other(Specify) $ 2. Other(Specify) $ TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS $ 28,000,000 Anticipated Fund Sources: A. Federal Grants $ State Grants $ B. Locally Generated Revenue M General Funds $ Capital Reserves $ 8,000,000 Other Fund $ Rates $ Assessments $ (LID,RID,ULID) Special Levies $ Federal Loan(s)from: (identify all) State Loan(s) from:(identify all) Public Works Board,2001 $ 10,000,000 Other. (identify sources) TOTAL LOCAL REVENUE $ 18,000,000 C. PUBLIC WORKS TRUST FUND LOAN $ 10,000,000 • P:lsharedlProject Typing\?Aerr ll 20011Construction Scope.rtf Scope of Work Page Four (PW-02-691-024) Calculating Local Percentage: Notes: 1. Grant funds can not be counted as local match Calculate as follows: Total Local Revenue PWTF Loan+Total Local Revenue = Local Percentage- 64.29% The local contribution must be at least: Five percent(5%) for a loan interest rate of 2% Ten percent(10%) for a loan interest rate of 1% Fifteen percent(15%) for a loan interest rate of .5% i PAshared\Prcject_TypingWterrill 2001\Construction Scope.rtf Public Works Trust Fund ATTACHMENT It: ATTORNEY'S CERTIFICATION I, hereby certify: am an attorney at law admitted to practice in the State of Washington and the duly appointed attorney of the (the LOCAL GOVERNMENT); and have also examined any and all documents and records which are pertinent to the loan agreement, including the application requesting this financial assistance. Based on the foregoing, it is my opinion that: 1. The LOCAL GOVERNMENT is a public body, properly constituted and operating under the laws of the State of Washington, empowered to receive and expend federal, state and local funds, to contract with the State of Washington, and to receive and expend the funds involved to accomplish the objectives set forth in their application. 2. The LOCAL GOVERNMENT is empowered to accept the Public Works Trust Fund financial assistance and to provide for repayment of the loan as set forth in the loan agreement. 3. There is currently no litigation in existence seeking to enjoin the commencement or completion of the above-described public facilities project or to enjoin the LOCAL GOVERNMENT from repaying the Public works Trust Fund loan extended by the DEPARTMENT with respect to such project. The LOCAL GOVERNMENT is not a party to litigation which will materially affect its ability to repay such loan on the terms contained in the loan agreement. 4. Assumption of this obligation would not exceed statutory and administrative rule debt limitations applicable to the LOCAL GOVERNMENT. Signature of Attorney Date Name Address 2/19/02 ONNING COMMITTEE M #2 MOBILE HOME PARK RELOCATION ASSISTANCE INFORMATION ITEM : Discussion on Mobile Home Park Closures and Tenant Relocation Assistance Options COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Fred N. Satterstrom, Community Dev. Director PLANNING SERVICES Charlene Anderson,AICP, Manager Phone:253-856-5454 K E N T Fax: 253-856-6454 WASHINGTON Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent,WA 98032-5895 February 19, 2002 TO: Chair Leona Orr and Planning Committee Members FROM: William D. Osborne, Planner RE: Mobile Home Park Closures and Tenant Relocation Assistance Options INTRODUCTION At the February 5, 2002 public meeting, City Council requested that staff research mobile home park closure and tenant relocation assistance. Several issues are raised by closure of a mobile home park, and this paper will focus discussion on relocation assistance. BACKGROUND Federal relocation assistance is only available to residents when displacement of their mobile units is caused by projects accessing federal funds. The Washington State Office of Community Development Manufactured Housing Department manages relocation assistance funding for mobile home park closures at the state level. Presently, available statewide funding is less than $15,000 — on a first-apply first-reimbursed basis, regardless of resident income. Documentation of moving costs is required for participation in this program, which allocates a maximum of $3,500 per single-wide unit, $7,000 per double-wide unit. During the 1990s, the City of Seattle passed two ordinances to regulate impacts of development- induced mobile home park closures and tenant relocation, particularly on impacted low-income residents. Summary points of Seattle's approach to these issues follow: ■ A mobile home park owner must submit a relocation report and plan that meets criteria of the Department of Construction and Land Use. This report and plan must be approved by DCLU under criteria derived from RCW Chapters 59.20 and 59.21 before the owner of the mobile home park may receive a Certificate of Compliance. The owner may then issue a Notice of Closure per statutory requirements (SMC 22.904.410). ■ The mobile home park owner shall update information required by SMC 22.904.420, to include any change of circumstances occurring after submission of the relocation report and plan that affects the relocation report and plan's implementation. ■ The Director of DCLU may deny or revoke any permit for non-compliance; or may condition approval of any permit upon the owner's successful completion of remedial actions deemed necessary by the Director to carry out the purposes of Sections 22.904.400 through 22.904.460. ■ Under Seattle's Tenant Relocation Assistance Ordinance, qualifying low-income residents forced to move by change of residential use are eligible for monetary relocation assistance. Funded half by the owner/applicant, half by the City of Seattle, each party contributes $1,066 to each household earning no more than fifty percent (50%) of the King County median family income — assistance totaling $2,132. At present, relocation assistance is not addressed in the Kent City Code. The Goals and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan Housing Element speak to the preservation and improvement of low- income housing, to include mobile home parks, but not specifically to tenant relocation assistance. In fact, these goals and policies are intended to pre-empt forced relocation by assisting in the replacement of dilapidated mobile homes. According to the Washington Low Income Housing Congress, the State Legislature is considering legislation to tax the sale of each mobile unit within a park (as a "fee"). This fee would re-capitalize the State mobile home relocation assistance fund, and relocating tenants could apply the funds toward purchase of another home. S:1Pemut\Plan\gc12002\Plg Cmte Memo_020802.doc • Page 2 of 2 2119102 PLANNING COMMITTEE ITEM #3 40 - TOWN HOUSE ZONING PROCESS INFORMATION ITEM : Discussion to consider a one-step process for rezoning to Multifamily Residential Townhouse. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Fred N. Satterstrom, AICP, Director PLANNING SERVICES KEN T Charlene Anderson,AICP, Manager WASHINGTON Phone: 253-856-5454 Fax: 253-856-6454 Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent,WA 98032-5895 February 11, 2002 TO: Chair Leona Orr and Planning Committee Members FROM: Charlene Anderson,AICP,Planning Manager RE: Townhouse Zoning Process This item has been placed on the Planning Committee agenda by Chair Orr at the request of a member of the Land Use&Planning Board. On August 17, 1999 the City Council passed Ordinance No. 3470 that established a new zoning district entitled "Multifamily Residential Townhouse". This district allows low to medium density housing where home ownership is encouraged consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. In order to take advantage of the Townhouse zoning district, the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation of the property must be Multifamily. Furthermore, the following zoning is required to be in existence on the entire property to be rezoned at the time of application for a rezone to an MR-T zone: SR-8, MRD, MRG, MRM, MRH, O, O-MU, NCC, CC, GC, DC, or DCE. Most often the townhouse zoning district designation becomes a two-step process, requiring both a comprehensive plan land use map and zoning map amendment through the annual comprehensive plan amendment process, followed by a request for rezone. The Land Use and Planning Board hears the comprehensive plan land use map and zoning map amendment, and the City Council makes the final decision. The Hearing Examiner hears the follow-up application for rezone, and the City Council makes the final decision. Another way of proceeding is to seek two comprehensive plan land use and zoning map amendments in two consecutive years — the first year seeking single family — 8 dwelling units per acre, and the second year seeking a comprehensive plan land use map designation of multifamily and zoning of MR-T. The issue to be addressed is whether the City Council desires to consider providing for a one-step process for rezoning to the Multifamily Residential Townhouse zoning district. In most cases, the process would entail a request for both a comprehensive plan land use map designation to Multifamily and a concurrent request for a zoning map amendment to one of the Multifamily Residential Townhouse zoning districts (either 12 or 16 dwelling units per acre). The process includes a public hearing before the Land Use and Planning Board, with the City Council making the final decision. The one-step process would save time for staff and City Council, we well as eliminate the additional public hearing. Staff will be present at the February 19"'Planning Committee meeting to answer questions. CA:S:\Permit\Plan\ZONECODEAMEND\2002\townhousezoning.DOC 2/19/02 PLANNING COMMITTEE ITEM #4 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS INFORMATION ITEM : Discussion to define the process for public participation in land use matters. 0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Fred N. Satterstrom, AICP, Director PLANNING SERVICES KEN T Charlene Anderson,AICP,Manager W A 9 H I N G T O N Phone:253-856-5454 Fax: 253-856-6454 Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent,WA 98032-5895 February 11, 2002 TO: Chair Leona Orr and Planning Committee Members FROM: Charlene Anderson, AICP, Planning Manager RE: Public Participation Process At the January 15, 2002 joint workshop of the City Council and Land Use and Planning Board there was discussion on defining the process for public participation in land use matters. There are several code provisions providing direction in this regard. The regulatory reform provisions of RCW 36.70B.050(2) in general require the City to provide for no more than one open record hearing and one closed record appeal when reviewing project permit applications. An "open record hearing" creates the City's record through testimony and submission of evidence and information, under procedures prescribed by ordinance or resolution. In some cases, e.g., for site-specific rezones, this open record hearing is known as an "open record pre-decision hearing", when it is held prior to the City's decision on a project permit. [Reference RCW 36.70B.020(3) and KCC 12.01.020(C).] In most cases, "project permits" exclude adoption or amendment of the comprehensive plan and development regulations, zoning of newly annexed land, area-wide rezones, and zoning map amendments. These excluded types of project permit applications typically are the ones reviewed by the Land Use and Planning Board. Accordingly, they are not subject to the regulatory reform provisions. Site-Specific Rezones Site-specific rezone applications are subject to the regulatory reform provisions of Kent City Code Chapter 12.01. As such, the hearing examiner holds an"open record pre-decision hearing" and forwards a report of findings and recommendations to the city council. At a regular"public meeting", the city council considers the hearing examiner's recommendation and issues a final decision. If we refer to the regulatory reform provisions of KCC 12.01.020(G), a"public meeting"does not include an open record hearing. Comprehensive Plan Amendments The Land Use and Planning Board holds a public hearing on proposed comprehensive plan amendments. Following the public hearing, KCC 12.02.060 states "...the planning department's recommendation shall be forwarded to the city council for action." The city council shall either affirm, deny, or modify or return the application to the planning department for further consideration. [Reference KCC 12.02.070.] It is important to keep in mind for comprehensive plan and development regulations that RCW 36.70A.140 requires cities to provide for early and continuous public participation. The code states, "...The procedures shall provide for broad dissemination of proposals and alternatives, opportunity for written comments, public meetings after effective notice, provision for open discussion, communication programs, information services, and consideration of and response to public comments..." Zoning Text Amendments and Area-Wide Zoning or Rezoning Both text amendments and area-wide rezones may be heard by the Land Use and Planning Board. Kent City Code Chapter 12.01.040 classifies these legislative amendments as Process VI applications where the Land Use and Planning Board holds the open record hearing and makes a recommendation to the city council. We can ascertain from KCC 15.09.050(H)(1) that at a regular "public meeting", the city council considers the recommendation and issues a final decision. Zoning of annexed lands There are two paths to be followed when considering annexed lands. For annexation areas, the Planning Services office generally presents to the Land Use and Planning Board ("Board") both a comprehensive plan amendment and initial zoning proposal. The Land Use and Planning Board holds at least one open record public hearing to consider the comprehensive plan and initial zoning for the area of the proposed annexation [KCC 15.09.055(C)]. Within 60 days of receipt of the Board's recommendation for the comprehensive plan amendment, the city council shall consider the comprehensive plan at a "public meeting." The council may approve or disapprove the comprehensive plan as submitted, modify and approve as modified, or refer the plan back to the Board for further proceedings. Regarding the Board's recommendation on the initial zoning designation, KCC 15.09.055(D)(2) requires the council to hold two or more public hearings at least thirty days apart. Historically, both the comprehensive plan amendment and initial zoning designation have been brought to the city council at the same time. Staff will be present at the February 19`h Planning Committee meeting to answer questions. CA:S:\Pennit\Plan\gc\2002\publicpadicipation.DOC • 2/19/02 PLANNING COMMITTEE ITEM #5 i BUILDABLE LANDS & TARGETS - STATUS REPORT INFORMATION ITEM : Report on Buildable Lands Evaluation and Growth Targets Extensions • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Fred N. Satterstrom, AICP, Director PLANNING SERVICES KEN T Charlene Anderson,AICP, Manager WASHINGTON Phone: 253-856-5454 Fax: 253-856-6454 Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent,WA 98032-5895 February 11, 2002 TO: Chair Leona Orr and Planning Committee Members FROM: Charlene Anderson, AICP, Planning Manager Michael Hubner, Buildable Lands Coordinator, Suburban Cities Association RE: Buildable Lands Evaluation and Growth Targets Extensions What is the Buildable Lands Program? The Buildable Lands Program was established as a requirement of Washington's Growth Management Act by amendment in 1997 (see RCW 36.70A.215). Under Buildable Lands, the City of Kent, in coordination with King County, is required to implement a review and evaluation program. The goals of this program include 1)determining whether"urban densities"are being achieved within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs), 2) measuring the degree of consistency between comprehensive plans and actual development that has occurred since their adoption, and 3) addressing any inconsistencies through follow-up measures to be adopted by local jurisdictions. The state Buildable Lands Program Guidelines more specifically direct local governments to undertake a series of data collection and analysis tasks with the objective of determining the adequacy of the current supply of "lands suitable for development" to accommodate growth needs for the remainder of the current planning horizon. This exercise represents an update of work done in the mid-1990s by King County and its cities to estimate land capacity within the UGA. One key difference—a reality check, of sorts—is a requirement that projections of future densities of development (e.g., dwelling units per acre) be based on development outcomes reflected in recent permits and plats. Capacity estimates for each city in King County and for the UGA as a whole are then evaluated against future growth needs, which are derived from the growth targets established in the Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). If a jurisdiction has less capacity, for either housing or employment, than targets remaining to be accommodated by 2012, then it must adopt measures—which may include changes to comprehensive plans and development regulations— expected to increase densities and overall development potential in the future. 1 • Buildable Lands in the City of Kent: Analysis and Evaluation Implementation of Buildable Lands began at the City of Kent during summer 1999. Final analyses of land supply and capacity were completed during winter 2001-02. Data have been collected and analyzed by Michael Hubner, Buildable Lands Coordinator for the Suburban Cities Association of King County, with the assistance of planners at the city. A countywide report on Buildable Lands is due to the state by September 1, 2002. The findings of the Kent analysis will appear, in summary format, in this document, and Kent's data are combined with data for all other cities and the urban unincorporated areas in the form of an evaluation of the entire King County UGA. Development History and Achieved Densities Extensive research of plats recorded and building permits issued during the 5-year review period (1996-2000) generated a detailed history of development that has occurred since (roughly) the adoption of Kent's comprehensive plan. The attached map, "Development Activity," shows locations of plats and permits. The attached table contains selected summary statistics from this database. Major findings include the following: • Total permits for 1,783 new units in single-family zones and 1,864 new units in multifamily zones and 942 newly platted single-family lots citywide • A total of over 5 million square feet of new commercial and industrial floor area permitted • • A total of 546 gross acres of land consumed by new development(building permits) • While measured single-family densities (net) are not strictly comparable to planned densities (based on gross acres), data show that single-family development largely has been consistent with planned densities • Multifamily density results are mixed, with development in MR-D and MR-G lagging somewhat below what is planned for these areas • Kent zoning does not set an envelope for non-residential building in terms of floor area ratio (FAR); permit data indicate robust densities in most commercial and industrial zones • CC, O, and —MU zones have experienced persistent auto-oriented single-story development, with low resulting floor area ratios (FARs), despite allowances for more intensive uses and structures • No true mixed-use projects were permitted in the mixed-use zones • Relatively little development occurred in the downtown compared with the amount of development potential that exists in the area Land Supply Inventory A geographic information systems analysis generated an inventory of vacant and redevelopable land updated to the year 2001. The attached maps, "Land Supply Inventory" and "Commuter Rail Station Area: Development Opportunities," show the map layers created by the analysis, along with notes on methodology. Major findings include the following: • A total of 3,775 gross acres of vacant and redevelopable land, of which 1,147 acres is • constrained by critical areas 2 . • After further deducting for future ROWS and public purposes and applying a discount to adjust for market availability, the analyses showed a total of 732 acres of net buildable vacant land and 1,179 acres of net buildable redevelopable land(all zoning categories) • A relatively small amount of land remains for further multifamily development (51.6 acres) • Three quarters of the single-family land supply is in the "redevelopable" category • The site of Boeing's Gateway project represents a majority of the vacant industrial land supply • The Kent Station Proposal site constitutes approximately one third of all developable land in the downtown area(Commuter Rail Station Area) Development Capacity and Future Growth Needs through 2012 Finally, the acreage figures and the achieved densities were analyzed together in order to estimate the anticipated yield of the land supply —in terms of additional dwelling units and employees—over the course of the current planning period. Major findings include the following: • Given existing zoning and recent market conditions, Kent's net buildable lands could be expected to accommodate a total of 6,814 new additional dwelling units. This compares with a remaining commitment to accommodate an estimated 4,100 dwelling units under the current targets. This leaves a surplus of 2,714 units of capacity. No action is required under Buildable Lands. • Given existing zoning and recent market conditions, Kent's net buildable lands could be • expected to accommodate a total of 14,448 new additional jobs. The city's total jobs target for 1993-2012 is 11,500. Target remaining under the CPPs, given recent annexations and partial data on employment growth, is preliminarily estimated to be 8,000 jobs. This leaves a surplus of about 6,500 potential jobs. No action is required under Buildable Lands. • While these findings represent a "passing grade" under Buildable Lands, planning for efficient land utilization increases in importance as Kent looks well beyond 2012 to continued growth while still meeting the goals of environmental protection, open space, mobility, economic development and other quality of life concerns. Buildable Lands and Beyond: Development Capacity, Growth Targets Extensions to 2022, and the Future of GMA Monitoring The exercise described in this memo is one element of ongoing coordinated planning for growth under GMA. Given adequate support from the state, the Buildable Lands Program itself continues, with follow up monitoring of the efficacy of any corrective measures adopted, with annual collection of development data, and with evaluations repeated every 5 years. The state Office of Community Development has eliminated all grants to local governments for Buildable Lands compliance in its current proposed budget. Efforts are underway to restore at least maintenance funding for the next biennium. Whatever the outcome, the types of ongoing monitoring and analysis mandated by Buildable Lands have proven valuable to the City of Kent and for King County at large. This first five-year review and evaluation represents a baseline for future work that should not merely be left "on the shelf,"but rather built upon as a tool for adaptive long-range land use planning. 3 • Another continuing activity is the allocation of new state Office of Financial Management forecasts for population growth through to a new planning horizon-2022. OFM released its forecast for King County in January 2002. An interjurisdictional group—the Buildable Lands and Targets (BLT) committee—has been working on a methodology for converting population to housing units, and for distributing housing and jobs among localities. The allocation relies on two tiers of analysis—from the county down to four subareas (see map of "Proposed Subareas—'), and from subareas down to jurisdictions. Criteria for allocating growth include the location of future employment growth (as forecasted by the Puget Sound Regional Council), planning for a "balance" of jobs and housing growth, efficiency of land use, proximity to job centers and transportation infrastructure, and development capacity as estimated for Buildable Lands. The outcome of the targets process will be a revision or amendment to the CPPs specifying the number of dwelling units and employees each city and the county will plan (i.e., provide land at appropriate densities) to accommodate over the next 20 years. Under the current timeline, draft targets are to go to the Growth Management Planning Council for review in late spring,with final adoption by local governments by the end of 2002. At present, the BLT has proposed allocations for each subarea. For the period 2001 through 2022, the south county is to accommodate a total of 49,214 housing units and approximately 82,500 jobs. These figures represent an additional policy commitment, beyond the current remaining growth targets, of 0 housing units and 15,153 jobs. What this means for the City of Kent is a determination that the existing residential growth target is more than adequate to accommodate population growth for an additional 10 years beyond 2012. A modest addition to the remaining jobs target would be required to meet projections for that period. • It should be noted that the methodology that generated these figures is still under discussion, and the numbers may yet change (although it is not likely they will change significantly). Still before the BLT are several fundamental issues, including 1) assumptions about future household size, 2) the flexibility allowed by a targets "extensions" approach, 3) equity among jurisdictions, 4) how to adjust for past miscalculations of development capacity that supported aggressive growth targets adopted by several jurisdictions, and 5) whether and how to provide a "cushion" to account for uncertainty in technical assumptions. The City of Kent continues to work with other cities and the county to determine a proper distribution of future growth that is consistent with both regional planning goals and local conditions. At the end of this process, staff will bring to the Council for their approval final recommended growth targets for Kent. S:\Pemut\Plan\gc\2002\PC Memo on Buildable Lands.DOC S:\Pemrit\Plan\gc\2002\PC Stats on Buildable Lands.DOC • 4 •Buildable Lands Program: Summary of Data for City of Kent Development Histo 1996-2000 Land Supply/Development Ca acit 2 2001 New Floor Redevelop- Dwelling New Floor DUs/ Area Vacant able Capacity Capacity Zone Units Area Ac3 RatiO4 Acres Acres (DUs) (Jobs SR-1 3 - 0.47 - 44.9 45.7 - SR-2 20 - 1.85 - 26.9 53.8 SR-3 530 - 7.23 - 27.5 90.9 - - SR-4.5 214 - 5.10 - 49.7 206.0 SR-6 929 - 6.16 - 139.8 431.3 - - SR-8 87 - 8.21 - 7.0 23.4 - Total SF 1,783 - - - 295.8 851.1 4,953 MRT-12 - - 0.7 0.0 - _ MRT-16 - - - - 6.6 0.0 - - MR-D 3 - 5.23 - 8.2 8.5 MR-G 1,148 - 12.84 - 8.7 3.4 - _ MR-M 133 - 35.95 - 6.4 9.0 _ Total MF 1,284 - - - 30.6 21.0 1,735 - CC - 202,971 0.23 9.4 20.6 NCC - - - - 1.5 4.2 _ O - 40,469 0.25 1.6 1.1 - CM-1 - 40,882 0.33 9.0 17.3 - CM-2 - 87,183 - 0.37 5.4 12.0 - • GC 260 178,842 - 0.32 54.2 36.0 GWC - 141,149 - 0.50 5.0 8.6 - _ Total COM 260 691,496 - 86.2 99.7 - 6,684 M1 - 1,999,786 - 0.44 192.8 42.3 - - M1-C - 390,431 - 0.39 5.0 - - _ M2 - 1,209,203 - 0.43 47.9 55.1 - M3 - 924,446 - 0.55 34.3 52.1 Total IND - 4,523,866 - - 280.0 149.5 - 7,764 CC-MU - 28,935 - 0.30 12.8 4.5 - - GC-MU 207 6,165 36.49 0.12 8.2 13.0 - O-MU - 7,156 - 0.13 5.4 9.2 - DCE 113 44,380 36.49 0.91 12.9 30.6 - Total MU 320 86,636 - - 39.3 57.4 Footnotes Footnotes CITY TOTALS 3,647 5,301,998 - - 732 1,179 6,814 14,448 'Columns present selected statistics only.DUs per acre in single-family zones based primarily on subdivision plats(with the exception of SR-3,where Kentview building permits inflate achieved net densities). Z Development capacity estimates are not calculated directly from other columns to left in table.The total for residential development capacity does not represent a straight sum of capacity figures above. For more complete details,see full set of analysis tables and documented methodology. 3 Achieved densities for both residential and non-residential development are calculated against a land area base that excludes critical areas and associated buffers,as well as dedications for ROWs and other public purposes. • 4 FAR is a measure of non-residential density,calculated as the sq. ft. of floor area divided by the sq. ft. of land. 5 Residential capacity in mixed-use zones is included in the capacity total for MF residential zones. e Employment capacity in mixed-use zones is included in the capacity total for commercial zones. Prepared by Michael Hubner,Buildable Lands Coordinator, Suburban Cities Association of King County(2/11/02) Buildable Lands and Targets Subcommittee Proposed Subareas for Growth Targets Allocations I. 111 N I IIii II� a i�i ii I,1 Ti ii t Ii r _ .a,.. i IiW L r i i 1 iIi ' � I iI -II i-IIJ ... c» (i F �» I iIj ( Ii{ ' tilii pia ,r" �iI p �i yy q T I Q 0 Urban Growth Area (UGA) Boundary Cities and Recent Annexations Growth Targets Subareas Eastside South Sea-Shore Rural Shaded areas represent consolidated statistical areas(TAZs)used by PSRC to forecast population, households,and jobs.Targets to be accommodated within UGAs. 0 10 Miles Produced by Michael Hubner, Suburban Cities Association, 216102 Y jllli iiY m uASr ,jt ��I >_���il,Nx �Jr■� I 1 L . tl ',Lie Ir r � Hi Ir ••,� wwll�� 11 /� � �� iI =1Y7if],.Ih1��,�.' -:,• ,�'�.�.����. t�-.:1���'�aid 1 � .�- i r..11n!�IIIIIIb. rlu.r,�i �_/ �• � yt- �'�jl■s'IF' gnaw' �Se L „■ N L - © �IIE111R411f. w o iiu 111 I -.i "- ��■ .PI� a'f -1 1 1 - l,t111L r:i� Ix.uu.aa Irwlw Ifrv{�rti� lLL'_ r I� •Irjyl• `� Lwd! wlil■, r �.� rY■ u m u. �, 1_�Ui rlr LIr dl �. �jj7w w Lni IImIt m � r�+�.SLmv_�li� 1■:1� �A rlrnl ri1N.,� 1�=E� �;�111 _ �_ ` ill '11L ;�s � nin n iL■ • lirwwi n11 Irk_ nn I1:.. nlit I 'r� r11F �i.�■ �iEl a ■ rl'Tij� t � �'.. 1r�n1 hrJ E4Tur1 ■. ,r ai�nl t nuntl��� w , ITuw ti :A ''�'i ...0 10, 7n.A-a 1 ' _^ W11 M�w��t114 �Illlllillc::�1Y, \■■r s'!�.lrll II� � q .0 o } 4�: s � t: u r N i e c .t C 3 p - '�' ....fbY { • r' r 1. r pf tn�� mw g a na_ < aD Z 00 � gc SO3 8� c 8 ail C1 C> T T a� =m 3 �' om=r 01 C �o $' w!mm o e$9 o 3 < al $.n � � 01 � a m �Ta n m ¢ a Q. £'£ m £ m = m m �' �' C Q. tP �_ !m � m 3 a o�m m� < T m < R m < ww < w CO)mg[� wm�3m £ m � m gam Km V, -+ paa o�i B w n S^� D g a $ .i m 0 < s m_q O O 0�w O n 3 m O 3 a 9 O 01 L' T Cr_ mm< m E 3o AaS 3Q c U O gm,Ln Q_m a Q_ y n O' a =-$ Q » P m 0 m d1 $4P ga 9. � aS m. m � = p a �Sm m » 5 m C 6® a sm m e m 41 m '�_ r B a a "» H �O f9c 9- 3 a j n m- rm � 3 s y m � » m o swa 3 o w o § c pmg w O a ' Sim Q— o ® 03 G �g a Wm 3 W$a NCL c N0 a 3g o'4 7 Q. c a 4£ Dgg Wig° m $ C $" a m . �s; 3 fA 3 ` -S Ri �3 40-� O. $ Z ng 3 m _ �ac _ 7 m &� '< s 673 E� ��$ o �m m i 3 FEBRUARY 12, 2002 EAGENDA COVER SHEET FOR THE 02/19/02 NNING COMMITTEE MEETING (3:00 PM) • TITLE OF ITEM#1 PUBLIC WORKS TRUST FUND LOAN AGREEMENT#PW-02-691-024 ACTION ITEM: A request for the Planning Committee to recommend to Council authorization for the Mayor to sign the PWTF Loan Agreement. BACKUP MATERIAL: Staff Report from Don Wickstrom dated 2/19/02 w/attachments. PRESENTER: Don Wickstrom TIME: 5 Minutes • TITLE OF ITEM#2 MOBILE HOME PARK RELOCATION ASSISTANCE INFORMATION ITEM: Discussion on Mobile Home Park Closures and Tenant Relocation Assistance Options BACKUP MATERIAL: Staff Report from William D. Osborne, dated 2/19/02 PRESENTER: Bill Osborne, Long Range Planner TIME: 5 Minutes TITLE OF ITEM#3 TOWNHOUSE ZONING PROCESS INFORMATION ITEM: Discussion to consider a one-step process for rezoning to Multifamily Residential Townhouse. OACKUP MATERIAL: Staff Report dated 2/11/02 PRESENTER: Charlene Anderson, Planning Manager TIME: 5 Minutes TITLE OF ITEM#4 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS INFORMATION ITEM: Discussion to define the process for public participation in land use matters. BACKUP MATERIAL: Staff Report dated 2/11/02 PRESENTER: Charlene Anderson, Planning Manager TIME: 5 Minutes TITLE OF ITEM#5 BUILDABLE LANDS &TARGETS - STATUS REPORT INFORMATION ITEM: Report on Buildable Lands Evaluation and Growth Targets Extensions BACKUP MATERIAL: Staff Report Dated 2/11/02 w/backup: 3 colored maps, 1 Black & White map, City of Kent Data Summary Table PRESENTER: Michael Hubner &IMF: 30 Minutes STermit]P1an l Pianning Committee1020219pc-cvrsht.doe 2/19/02 PLANNING COMMITTEE ITEM #1 PUBLIC WORKS TRUST FUND LOAN AGREEMENT #PW-02-691 -024 ACTION ITEM : A request for the Planning Committee to recommend to Council authorization for the Mayor to sign the PWTF Loan Agreement. 0