Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Committees - Planning and Economic Development Committee - 11/19/1996 CITY OF �uV Jy Jim White, Mayor CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA NOVEMBER 19, 1996 THE CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE IS HOLDING A MEETING ON NOVEMBER-19, 1996 AT 4:00 P.M. IN THE-COUNCIL CHAMBERS EAST ROOM OF KENT CITY HALL AT 220 S. FOURTH AVENUE. 4 Committee Members Leona Orr, Chair Jon Johnson Tim Clark AGENDA '.. 1. Position on Agricultural Preservation INFORMATION ITEM - 15 Minutes - (F. Satterstrom) 2. Regional Justice Center Contract for ACTION ITEM - 15 Minutes Human Services Mitigation contract - (C. Sundvall) 3. Annexation Policy - (J. Harris) INFORMATION ITEM - 15 Minutes 4. Moratorium on Communication Towers INFORMATION ITEM - 15 Minutes - (T. Brubaker) Added Items: ANY PERSON REQUIRING A DISABILITY ACCOMMODATION SHOULD CONTACT THE CITY IN ADVANCE FOR MORE INFORMATION. FOR TDD RELAY SERVICE, CALL 1-800-635-9993 OR THE CITY OF KENT AT (206)813-2068. mp:c:pc111196.agn ^20 4th AVE 40 l KENT W 4SHINGTON 9803? 5 14 WHEREAS, Goal LU-27 of the Kent Comprehensive Plan encourages the conservation and enhancement of agricultural areas through regulation, acquisition and other methods; and WHEREAS, Policy LU-27.1 discourages urban development of designated, long-term agricultural areas; and WHEREAS, Policy LU-27.2 discourages incompatible land uses from locating adjacent to designated agricultural lands; and WHEREAS, Policy LU-27.3 seeks to reduce adverse environmental impacts to agricultural lands which are caused by urban development; and WHEREAS, Policy LU-27.4 encourages the City of Kent to work with King County to provide for purchasing or transferring the development rights of agricultural lands identified as having long-term commercial significance; and WHEREAS, the Land Use Plan Map of the Kent Comprehensive Plan designates certain valley floor lands located both within the City of Kent and in unincorporated King County for agricultural use; and WHEREAS, land use conversion pressures continue to bear upon agriculturally-designated properties which have not had their development rights purchased and, applications for land use conversion have continued to be submitted to King County government for the past several years; and WHEREAS, the City of Kent has maintained an interest in the outcome of these deliberations and has submitted comments and letters of support for the retention of agricultural lands to the King County Executive and Metropolitan Council; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Kent does declare its continued support for the preservation of designated agricultural lands within the City of Kent and its unincorporated potential annexation area(PAA) as shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Map and, furthermore, encourages the County Executive and Metropolitan Council to consider this position in its review of land use amendments which would threaten the continuation and viability of these agricultural lands. CITY OF L"L2 Planning Department (206) 859-3390/FAX (206) 850-2544 James P. Harris, Planning Director Jim White, Mayor MEMORANDUM November 19, 1996 TO: LEONA ORR, CHAIR, AND PLANNING COMMITTEE MEMBERS FROM: CAROLYN SUNDVALL, HUMAN SERVICES PLANNER SUBJECT: CONTRACT FOR THE REGIONAL JUSTICE CENTER HUMAN SERVICES IMPACTSTUDY Background In March of 1995 King County and the City of Kent entered into a mitigation agreement regarding the impacts of the Regional Justice Center (RJC). Appendix C of that Agreement provides for Human Services Mitigation. As part of the mitigation the County has given money to the City of Kent to study the impacts on the nonprofit human services delivery system and to develop a standardized data collection system for agencies. City staff has interviewed and selected a consultant to do the study in two phases: 1. Phase I begins before the RJC is open and will set up a data collection process and methodology to enable agencies to measure the impact of the RJC on human services delivery, and to apply for compensation for services. 2. Phase II begins after the RJC is open and will assess how effectively the human services system is serving users from the RJC and identify any gaps in services. Due to the tight timeline for starting the project, (Dec. 4, 1996), staff is requesting that this item go directly from the Planning Committee to the full Council for action on November 19, 1996. Recommended Action 1. Authorization for the Mayor to sign a contract in the amount of$74,380 with ALL FOR A GOOD CAUSE to complete a human services impact study of the Regional Justice Center. 2. Forward this recommendation to the full City Council for consideration at its November 19, 1996 meeting. LWmp:a:rjc2.wpd cc: James P. Harris, Planning Director Lin Houston, Human Services Manager 2204th AVE SO /KENT WASHINGTON 98032-58951 TELEPHONE (206)859-33001 FAX N 859-3334 CONSULTANT SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF KENT AND "ALL FOR A GOOD CAUSE" THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the City of Kent, a Washington municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City"), and "ALL FOR A GOOD CAUSE", organized under the laws of the State of Washington, located and doing business at 12525 17th NE, Seattle, Washington, 98125 (hereinafter the "Consultant"). Recitals 1 . The City desires that the Consultant perform services necessary to conduct a human services impact study from the Regional Justice Center located at 401 North 4th Avenue Kent, Washington. 2. The Consultant agrees to perform the services more specifically described in the Scope of Work, dated December 4, 1996, including any addenda thereto as of the effective date of this agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit A which is incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: CONSULTANT CONTRACT/RIC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 1 of 15 14:Nov 96 I. Description of Work Consultant shall perform all work as described in Exhibit A. Consultant further represents that the services furnished under this agreement will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices in effect at the time such services are performed. II. Payment A. The City shall pay the Consultant, based on time and materials, an amount not to exceed $74,380 for the services described in Section I herein. This is the maximum amount to be paid under this Agreement for Tasks 1.1 - 2.4 in Exhibit A, and shall not be exceeded without the prior written authorization of the City in the form of a negotiated and executed supplemental agreement. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, the City reserves the right to direct the Consultant's compensated services under the time frame set forth in Section IV herein before reaching the maximum amount. The Consultant's billing rates shall be as delineated in Exhibit A. B. The Consultant shall submit monthly payment invoices to the City after such services have been performed, and a final bill upon completion of all the services described in this Agreement. The City shall pay the full amount of an invoice within forty-five (45) days of receipt. If the City objects to all or any portion of any invoice, it shall so notify the Consultant of the same within fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt and shall pay that portion of the invoice not in dispute, and the parties shall immediately make every effort to settle the disputed portion. CONSULTANT CONTRACr/RIC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 2 of 15 14:Nov 96 C. In the event the Scope of Work is modified or changed so that more or less work or time is required by the Consultant, and such modification is reached by mutual agreement of the parties to this contract, the payment for services and maximum contract amount shall be adjusted accordingly upon agreement of the parties. III. Relationship of Parties The parties intend that an independent contractor-employer relationship will be created by this Agreement. As Consultant is customarily engaged in an independently established trade which encompasses the specific service provided to the City, no agent, employee, representative or sub-contractor of Consultant shall be or shall be deemed to be the employee, agent, representative or sub-contractor of the City. In the performance of the work, Consultant is an independent contractor with the ability to control and direct the performance and details of the work, the City being interested only in the results obtained under this Agreement. None of the benefits provided by the City to its employees, including, but not limited to, compensation, insurance, and unemployment insurance are available from the City to the employees, agents, representatives, or sub-contractors of the Consultant. Consultant will be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and for the acts of Consultant's agents, employees, representatives and sub-contractors during the performance of this Agreement. The City may, during the term of this Agreement, engage other independent contractors to perform the same or similar work. IV. Duration of Work The City and Consultant agree that work will begin on the tasks described in Exhibit A immediately upon execution of this Agreement. The parties agree that the work described CONSULTANT CONTRACTIRIC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 3 of 15 14:Nov 96 in Exhibit A is to be completed within 1,244 calendar days of the execution of this Agreement; provided however, that additional time shall be granted by the City for excusable delays or extra work, as described in Section VI.(D) below. V. Place of Work The Consultant shall perform the work authorized under this Agreement at its offices in Seattle, Washington. Meetings with the City staff as described in Exhibit A, Scope of Work, shall take place at the City's offices at 400 West Gowe, Kent, Washington, or at locations mutually agreed upon by the parties. VI. Termination A. Termination of Agreement If the City receives reimbursement by any federal, state, or other source for work described in Section I herein, and that funding is withdrawn, reduced or limited in any way, or the project is cancelled or substantially reduced after the execution date of this Agreement and prior to the completion of the work, the City may summarily terminate this Agreement. Termination shall be effective ten calendar days after Consultant's receipt of the written notice by certified mail. B. Termination for Failure to Provide Services Bargained For, The Consultant agrees that it was hired by the City based on the Consultant's representation that employees identified in the Scope of Work, attached CONSULTANT CONTRACT/RIC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 4 of 15 14:Nov 96 hereto as Exhibit A. will be available to perform the services described in Section I for the duration of this Agreement. If any of the employees identified in the Scope of Work are unavailable to perform the services bargained for, for any reason, the City of Kent reserves the right to terminate this contract or renegotiate the amount of consideration. The consultant must immediately notify the City, in writing, if any employee identified in the Scope of Work is unavailable to perform the services described in Section I of this Agreement. Nothing in the foregoing language will alter the Consultant's independent contractor status. C. Termination for Failure to Prosecute Work or to Complete Work Satisfactorily If the Consultant refuses or fails to prosecute the work with such diligence as will ensure its completion within the time frames specified herein, or as modified or extended as provided in this Agreement, or to complete such work in a manner consistent with the standard of care in Consultant's profession, then the City may, by written notice to the Consultant, give notice of its intention to terminate the Consultant's right to proceed with the work. On such notice, the Consultant shall have ten (10) calendar days to cure, to the satisfaction of the City or its representative, or the City shall send the Consultant a written termination letter which shall be effective upon the Consultant's receipt of the written notice by certified mail. Upon termination, the City may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion, by contract or otherwise, and Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional costs incurred by it in the completion of the Scope of Work referenced as Exhibit A and as modified or amended prior to termination. "Additional Costs" shall mean all reasonable costs incurred by CONSULTANT CONTRACT/RJC HS IMPACT STUDY-Page 5 of 15 14:Nov 96 the City beyond the maximum contract price specified in Section II(A), above. D. Excusable Delays The right of Consultant to proceed shall not be terminated nor shall Consultant be charged with liquidated damages for any delays in the completion of the work due to: 1) any acts of the federal government in controlling, restricting, or requisitioning materials, equipment, tools, or labor by reason of war, national defense, or other national emergency; 2) any acts of the City, its consultants, or other public agencies causing such delay; and 3) causes not reasonably foreseeable by the parties at the time of the execution of the Agreement that are beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God, fires, floods, strikes, or weather of unusual severity; and (4) negotiated and executed supplemental agreements between the City and Consultant for Consultant to perform extra work defined as tasks not included in the Scope of Work referenced as Exhibit A. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the Consultant must promptly notify the City within ten (10) calendar days in writing of the cause of the delay. If, on the basis of the facts and the terms of this Agreement, the delay is properly excusable, the City shall, in writing, extend the time for completing the work for a period of time commensurate with the period of excusable delay. E. Rights Upon Termination In the event of termination, the City shall pay for all services performed by the Consultant to the effective date of termination, as described on a final invoice submitted to the City. After termination, the City may take CONSULTANT CONTRACT/RJC HS IMPACT STUDY-Page 6 of 15 14:Nov 96 possession of all records and data within the Consultant's possession pertaining to this project which may be used by the City without restriction. Any such use not related to the project which Consultant was contracted to perform shall be without liability or legal exposure to the Consultant. VII. Discrimination In the hiring of employees for the performance of work under this Agreement or any sub- contract hereunder, the Consultant, its sub-contractors, or any person acting on behalf of such Consultant or sub-contractor shall not, by reason of race, religion, color, sex, national origin, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability, discriminate against any person who is qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates. VI I I. Indemnification Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City. The City's inspection or acceptance of any of Consultant's work when completed shall not be grounds to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons CONSULTANT CONTRACT/RJC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 7 of 15 14:Nov 96 or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers, the Consultant's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence. IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE INDEMNIFICATION PROVIDED HEREIN CONSTITUTES THE CONSULTANT'S WAIVER OF IMMUNITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE, TITLE 51 RCW, SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS INDEMNIFICATION. THE PARTIES FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED THIS WAIVER. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. IX. Insurance The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees, sub-consultants or sub-contractors. Before beginning work on the project described in this Agreement, the Consultant shall provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing: 1. Automobile Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and 2. Commercial General Liability insurance written on an occurrence basis with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate for personal injury, bodily injury and property damage. Coverage shall include but not be CONSULTANT CONTRACT/RJC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 8 of 15 14:Nov 96 limited to: blanket contractual; products/completed operations/broad form property damage; explosion, collapse and underground (XCU) if applicable; and employer's liability; and The City shall be named as an additional insured on the Commercial General Liability insurance policy, as respects work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant and a Copy of the endorsement naming the City as additional insured shall be attached to the Certificate of Insurance. The City reserves the right to receive a certified copy of all the required insurance policies. The Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance shall contain a clause stating that coverage shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respects to the limits of the insurer's liability. The Consultant's insurance shall be primary insurance as respects the City and the City shall be given thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, of any cancellation, suspension or material change in coverage. X. Exchange of Information The City warrants the accuracy of any information supplied by it to Consultant for the purpose of completion of the work under this Agreement. The parties agree that the Consultant will notify the City of any inaccuracies in the information provided by the City as may be discovered in the process of performing the work, and that the City is entitled to rely upon any information supplied by the Consultant which results as a product of this Agreement. CONSULTANT CONTRACURJC HS IMPACT STUDY-Page 9 of 15 14:Nov 96 XI. Ownership and Use of Records and Documents Original documents, drawings, designs and reports developed under this Agreement shall belong to and become the property of the City. All written information submitted by the City to the Consultant in connection with the services performed by the Consultant under this Agreement will be safeguarded by the Consultant to at least the same extent as the Consultant safeguards like information relating to its own business. If such information is publicly available or is already in Consultant's possession or known to it, or is rightfully obtained by the Consultant from third parties, Consultant shall bear no responsibility for its disclosure, inadvertent or otherwise. All data, documents and files created by Consultant under this Agreement may be stored at Consultant's office in Seattle, Washington. Consultant shall make such data, documents, and files available to the City upon its request at all reasonable times for the purpose of editing, modifying and updating as necessary until such time as the City is capable of storing such information in the City's offices. Duplicate copies of this information shall be provided to the City upon its request, and at reasonable cost. Any use or reuse of the documents, data and files created by Consultant for the City on this project by anyone other than Consultant on any other project shall be without liability or legal exposure to Consultant. XII. Recyclable Materials Pursuant to Chapter 3.80 of the Kent City Code, the City requires its contractors and consultants to use recycled and recyclable products whenever practicable. A price preference may be available for any designated recycled product. CONSULTANT CONTRACT/R)C HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 10 of 15 14:Nov 96 XIII. City's Right of Inspection Even though Consultant is an independent contractor with the authority to control and direct the performance and details of the work authorized under this Agreement, the work must meet the approval of the City and shall be subject to the City's general right of inspection to secure the satisfactory completion thereof. The Consultant agrees to comply with all federal, state, and municipal laws, rules, and regulations that are now effective or in the future become applicable to Consultant's business, equipment, and personnel engaged in operations covered by this Agreement or accruing out of the performance of such operations. XIV. Consultant to Maintain Records to Support Independent Contractor Status On the effective date of this Agreement (or shortly thereafter), Consultant shall: A. File a schedule of expenses with the Internal Revenue Service for the type of business Consultant conducts; B. Establish an account with the Washington State Department of Revenue and other necessary state agencies for the payment of all state taxes normally paid by employers, register to receive a unified business identifier number from the State of Washington; and C. Maintain a separate set of books and records that reflect all items of income and expenses of Consultant's business, all as described in the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) Section 51.08.195, as required to show that the services performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall not give rise to an employer-employee relationship between the parties which is subject to RCW Title 51, Industrial Insurance. CONSULTANT CONTRACrlRIC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 11 of 15 14:Nov 96 XV. Work Performed at Consultant's Risk Consultant shall take all precautions necessary and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and subcontractors in the performance of the work hereunder and shall utilize all protection necessary for that purpose. All work shall be done at Consultant's own risk, and Consultant shall be responsible for any loss of or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in connection with the work. XVI. Non-Waiver of Breach The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained herein, or to exercise any option herein conferred in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of said covenants, agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect. XVII. Resolution of Disputes and Governing Law Should any dispute, misunderstanding, or conflict arise as to the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement, the matter shall first be referred to the City, and the City shall determine the term or provision's true intent or meaning. The City shall also decide all questions which may arise between the parties relative to the actual services provided or to the sufficiency of the performance hereunder. If any dispute arises between the City and Consultant under any of the provisions of this Agreement which cannot be resolved by the City's determination in a reasonable time, or if Consultant does not agree with the City's decision on the disputed matter, jurisdiction of CONSULTANT CONTRACT/RIC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 12 of 15 14:Nov 96 any resulting litigation shall be filed in King County Superior Court, King County, Washington. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. In any claim or lawsuit for damages arising from the parties' performance of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to compensation for all legal costs and attorney's fees incurred in defending or bringing such claim or lawsuit, in addition to any other recovery or award provided by law; provided, however, nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit the City's right to indemnification under Section VIII of this agreement. XVII1. Written Notice All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the parties at the addresses listed on the signature page of the agreement, unless notified to the contrary. Any written notice hereunder shall become effective upon the date of mailing by registered or certified mail, and shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing. XIX. Assignment Any assignment of this Agreement by the Consultant without the written consent of the City shall be void. If the City shall give its consent to any assignment, the terms of this agreement shall continue in full force and effect and no further assignment shall be made without the City's consent. CONSULTANT CONTRACT/RJC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 13 of 15 14:Nov 96 XX. Modification No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the City and Consultant. XXI. Entire Agreement The written provisions and terms of this Agreement, together with any Exhibits attached hereto, shal I supersede all prior verbal statements of any officer or other representative of the City, and such statements shall not be effective or be construed as entering into or forming a part of or altering in any manner this Agreement. The entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereunder is contained in this Agreement and any Exhibits attached hereto. All of the above documents are hereby made a part of this Agreement and form the Agreement document as fully as if the same were set forth herein. Should any language in any of the Exhibits to this Agreement conflict with any language contained in this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. [Signatures on following page.] CONSULTANT CONTRACT/RIC HS IMPACT STUDY-Page 14 of 15 14:Nov 96 V IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties below have executed this Agreement. CONSULTANT THE CITY OF KENT by by its its DATE: DATE: Notices to be sent to: Notices to be sent to: CONSULTANT Mr. James P. Harris Director of Planning The City of Kent 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, Washington 98032 (206) 859-3390 APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: Kent City Attorney Kent City Clerk CON SU LTK.gen CONSULTANT CONTRACT/RJC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 15 of 15 14:Nov 96 CL 0 Q v m a 0 Q mo lit .. o m � xc m = - cDon m0 � = a0m0o CD oo �CD i m m _ W 0 0 0 0 m m o o v 0 � m � v = m cn of o ID v o w CD0 o w o 00 0 c0�n cmn v d m 0 0' � � D cr m v c (n cn y O� 0 m 0 N m 0 �G .m. m fl1 7 Q m (p X• cn (D tmn Z -mp O W a y a O 7 N C fCD a a d m 0 m CL 7 7 a N U = 7 N 0 0 O 0 O Sm � d N (O '"'CD N (n (D D (mn CL O m m _ o m �_ m a y. O n ^' 0 �I 7 S O" CO O O' 0 " � N O_ 3 N '-Q c a m 1O Q_ � CD m 'a m ITi c j c 6 d a .. v fr � a o X a3i z m = o• m 0 ny m �' o0 0 O < <_ ,G O cn l< ,_; O (D p 0. XCD CO m m v 3 Cc m ? • ,m0„ y rn 0' � o g o CD v cn H N C 0. m CL 0 n 'a a 3 v, n CD ca � am � � � omv c � � 0mm mm m C- 0 3 0 = � 0 � CD CD (a f m N o a C� m CL j T o (D (D p < o O= 7 cn o p� m (D �' 0 c m cn 0 v < CD 3 m r, 0 d v N � N fOA � 0; < m CL m — m o " m m .. r. a � 1� om m o a °o 3 0 w m 3 CD c 2v m 30 < omy m c (n dcv � °: o. m n "a m y X 0 0 0 7 7 7 � <D rt d`< 0 � o � (D _ D) 7 Q o — y fn "6 m 0 =(o O O N `� <D 3 `< CO m M N O 3' O f7 C ^' C (C j CD rt N 0 O 3 n• (p (� 3 _ 0 0 0 3 .. m ov m O w (mn 3 (D .C•. m W 7 (D ,n. m ((DD m v, s ) m 0 �' y a 0vma oa CD y, NJ CD (D v C N _ O �, c0 °� c 4 =O o o c m 6 0 0 cD = o - m2 0 O vac l< o 0 0 � 0 3 (D 0,� c0 m a5' m3 Nm O m U) o m y 52. m c0 COL a3 o C CL 2 =; 0 a co �_ m a• cn 0 -0w CD a am '• 0 o � 0 m o. Fn -o m 0 � 0 o a c n<im o oc° Cn 0a c; m0 — o c U) co m o �, a O m x 0 3 0 v m m 3 r. 0 0 m CD CD co 0 c o. l< o CD < M' X �. o c o 0 co a CD CD0) � 3 3 'm CD 'a c I 0 x v i N 0 m 7 3 7 m Q D (— � � � 00 o :3 00 � 00 ? 0 9 -O IV O W N O? j o to O Ln 7 J to J cc CO C CD co � � -4 0) CD(o (O v o) v 0) I CD J • • Cy 7• CO 7� • • • • (D ht N n ?! 0 m S 0) n v � -n 7p o m Oo a m w m CO x 0 3o p a -0nNa (m yCN OOo a' (n O_ n - 0 M N' - CD S' < cDo- 5 . C 000 CD mom a0 w a 303 o o3 c cm (D ym w < 0 m o cn o a3 0 (D =3N CD 00- c) 3 ao = 3w5. _ N`00 7 C -0 •cD rwQ � oa .03 CD o m m N r m CDw v a o O (D nm 3 n m 0 N ch N a N m 0 0 0 1 p 0 O 3N3 Hw co 0 CA CD mN m CCNao ;vwmdm D � L0. L o mw > 3 0 �o 3 s : co y o m + � D cn Oa ! 00 0 7 z X 3 Cv ~'Cn N 01 '= 7 N j N 7 .O.w m N n 0 m o o o � < o Qua m CD 3 sv =r 3 o y N c 0 � C 0 (n o O a CD a ,., 0 0 C.L w 7' -a _ ,.w n CS a . 3 ' o l< � 3 0 a m o g Q o o ca -o — 0 °co CD co' o v, y a m m o < N Ca 0 a , a o n m m N a —i 0.v v w mp_ rn N a m ,< m ? (p 0 0) m o N n C "00 n m � N � �' cfl •* m 3 � 0 m = o o CD CD ao v � CD aav 8: CD Ch o� az 0 mm (n (n 0 (D � 0M o�� m0 0 m a0 3 w xa �' �; 3cmi c 0) - o 3' 2 va o m oa 3m < 0 m 0 m a, �, � acoao o 1 n 3 = o m' 3 m < C o a (D o 0� n � `< v, CD sv 3 °' a v<�,: -I � off ° a 3 CC CD 0 CD=r o m CD 3 O0 CD m < o v 3 0 < o sD � �' � o < aco' � m y ni a N n N 3 Cr CD o CD fl: CL0 W rm O 0 N 0 U) N o I a ° m m `n m o a � m X, 0 C o C1 cn 0 0 0 o a a 3 m < a m m m < N a s 0 o y 0 0 a 3 � < o cw CD o m CD C- m cc N oar n� sa • • • • • n O co a Is -n2 � 3 fla, w 3 m0a 0 a c m m a m m N o o N °' w m s sy " 0 w m o 0mco3mo m o a co o m o. 0 m m cQ 0 a d N (gyp CD = 3 d < �n a0 (=j 7 `< 0 20 C3RmdaaOvo m N .+ 3 o um, s v rww o m m a , a � O CL C O o -^' CD 7 0 Cn N 3' m -p 0 0 to O Cn (Q .O•w .•w 0 d mO m O.S Cn 1 a O CD 0 m� - CD 3 CD CLC ca CD n oa3 CL 0 v X � m CD N m O O CD =. Cn m 7 0 0 2 7 C o `Z O0 n a. .C•w CD n 2) 7 _ Cc a Cc 7 N a 0 c° m m co a D m C— o CD : p Q C -4 ' N r n SU 7 Ul ,Z Cn CG :3 v N TI OD m -4 coo m co to co N v 7C - 7' Co -w CD CL nfu _ y o n -0 O a - co ° c v n m cn m p m 3 p m � p ., nai • • • to O CD 0 N CD o c a o CD m o cfDi 0 a a cn fD v o. a � � 0 m �� m o o T3 � p ? CD c N — ' 3 m .a ° 0 y ° 7 m m 3 c• � � ° � aO m s m y > > m fD o ili '� �. ° a CD vi m m M v � g �°, ° N m o ° a y � CD a � 3' � m 5 < < aco 3CL °'. Cn CDcnCD m -� q ° CD < 0 co CD CD 0 0 3 CD d n. — 0- y ° ayi ° o o a ° ° a o ° o p 0 3 c a o ° m ac ° ° c v CD Ny mo3 yr' =-09ovo — Z o 6 = o. m o v y o N m < y y 0 o 3 c = S r 0 0 cm my `o �CD 0 � o v �« 0W ° :3 0)3 ^ 0100 a � � � 0 CD 0 3c ° a any '0 a: oniv, o0o- o - S = CD v 0 c ° m y °� 0 0. c o� c c � m m a =: 0 0 a <_. '" CD — 0 3 0 �a p °' v M 3 0 0 0 m m o m 0 � C y C m c ° � w w =3 N ._r CL CD C! O' � y O fG N 0 7 O N '�O CD y O CD n fD O O . 0 0 CD a N (D O 0 y O �+ — y Cp a a CD c ;0 7 > 3 0 0 y ° O N 2) CD y 3 (O O y O uy) 0 S CD 7 (D a =• .+ CD , y 3 a = 3 S a y 7 a CD N n = O ° CD � � 7 .0.. � � y 0 7 :� N CD O a y CD y O O � Op CD CD O CD fD N y N y N m > > ° ' 3 coi v tQ 0o v y v N 3 0 ai y co CD CD a O o CD 0 a c v 0 y m 0 CD FD. O - = O 0 O o = CD -0 m CD 0 w 0 CL y CD CD o. CD 0 m 0 a CD c ?. N c v vi ( CD �� ac (Doo oy ° m0) .. o v C �n a30 0 � CD y(D in c v 0 to FD* w a cn a • • • • • • n 0 0 0 0 T N ui ° 0 ° o m o 0 � 7 y � y 3 0 y 0 cc �. a N C f0 7 �• O O O M CD CD y y a .. FP y N 0 =r m CDC wE o 3 3 N :3 0)N Can CD 3 ca 0 o ° 3 CD 0 CD N O O "O y 3 CAD 0 CD C CD N CD O N y w y CD °. n. O OM y O O > > w X CO v S Q D 0 Cfoo a a• C 3 O CD -4 _ a CT co CC W � � N � hl C)1 QO 1 > fU CD C.0 co (J CD Cfl W C 2 R � ■ ƒ E � cr = ono � 53 CD � o a ° G § 7 o cSS , D ° S ;IDf \ . 2 § 3S % Em ƒ � [ ' \ ± @ \ = , § " q � 2 0 (D 0cnmG ƒ ) / k \ \ _ \ / cor (fii � § 22k 2 i § � � B � ]a == — ® JE � — % / \ � gMa e0 m E 222 \ _ g :3 , _ = o = a ° o § 9k { CDCL k\ \ k cn ck \ k o � o & = mm © \ ± E e-0 § � kid \ { i� 3 ; § � 3CD \ E$ @ z k (D k \ k � rM 2 ± / 2 § } ¢ E \ m m _ o , , i c g= , — � / J = o ° w / , o „Cl) \ � \ e CD CC CD / a � q $ _ % f ; @ a — = o ° m ;_ Em T. } n = o — \ § \ E � 7 � a-co E \ = § § & } f/ / } 2 (D E r- ] k \ m ƒ2 \ MM J / d 0 a ; 2j � 2 = _ ° § 8 ka 0 g = 7E2 § aaE o � 0 \d { 7 % § / m 0 © £ r E 3c � \ (D _ _ 40 ' 0 0 W co % I k ° 0 2 £ \ 0 i \ $ c § \ / E \ ° 0 ] k 7 to ® i Cr CD7 ; \ \ 0 ƒ J = m k \ M. \ \ \ / co \ oco co \ ] ® � 0 N CD 2)• O � am 0 ;V m � � c <_. a = a o -1 O p y 0 0 nci m 3 FD- m 0 m (D m a n a <• 0 CD- - CD m m ;: o 0 ? c• y y T � 3c En 2 (D a 3 2 (o �c w c cD (D Cr (c = c' 0 � vo, r 0 (D v, m =� 'aFPm3:(o 3 aim o07' 3 cn � .. (D m3mc 3 w � y (D m : � 0. � 3 o --1 o » am p °:co w ? D o < c 7 C i .0. 0 o 0 0 0 3 afDi O 3p m v � CD (0 y �, m Z .. 3 ^' � cfl 1D n � m ai 3 (n 0 3 0 o3y a� �, m y 2 mon .. m w ' Nx' CD'< cm o 3 a DYy my m D 01 v a t �' CD y � o v y m .co.. m ;r 3 o a v 0• m m '+ 0 � CD o m a c n O �' c r. Li �, w o m (n (0n w m m (o 0 0 ^' � z 0 w � r. �• m .* m c < O to 0) 'a m o a y m m m -o 3 ~ ,< � � v0, c 0 w y 6d 0CL cc � m m < < (D .om3o_ N w CD0 Q0cn cM wg M m 0cc � 3 v, cCD 0 = c . (D c 0. m 0 0 N w �• � = o m : w (n — E 0CLa co < S 7 z c O = _. 3 O 3 (D M °: (D w (D ° 0 U0i m C CL N < CD O 0 n wn " 3 w w °� 3 < � � �� d <_ m (D o v0 f° c m °.-0 m y m m m -gym v m -• = ' -• = � CA- o c0i (o < o � a mw WCDio3 �; - 0a u3i CL c � CL o. 6DN < O. to a O .. N -+ C O• n .0 O- m Q <_ < -a x' ¢ y 3 N n' n �D 0 CD C m 7 CD 0 0 � � � � w (D o. � md � cQ � 7CL m c o � m o� 5 � a 2) N 0 Cl) � o m ,. 0. :3 = C a c i3 � < ' o °' ;T a2 c3 vwiCD � d .. 3 L n = 0 O O w (D 0 y O O E N O ? c N O ^" 0 w `z a 3 O — (D 7 O 0 6 m m (D 3 c a m y m a� o �• m c0i 0 �-' � ' m w o a n w = 0) d 03 (n03 m m 3 0 3 0 CDo w • • Go 0 Gs A O mT co 0 c m 3 � c c CD -a CD rii � a 3 2) m CD -0 a °' o m o T o (on 3 arc � .�. = � 3m3 0 3 CL of a m m _o ° < o �• c m w o (A m CD w a M CD c a 3 = way (n �' oCD m3 <a a0 N= c :3a m � m m S• amn cc mom m a m o m c mru CD w (o O R. 3 2 vCD CD w m c CD <' CDw � y o m y 0 a CD x c D D 23 D � �. ,' c. Om Q 3 O = 0 CA)(0 =r 3 a O O Ca 0 3 Ia 7 N N 00 co co 00 co O CC) CD O �I O N ul -f ■ R � Cr > � a750 E � 0QS3 ± (A 0 in . . . . m2 � § � S9 Q 3I = � � � . 3nm C 0 § § § / § ƒ £ i0 § k ) o 0 � ® cnq > ® DER § a = RR � _ B £ g m a � o ; E - E 7 � e § E � = ? £ = o , : & CD9 5 ; EECD RR � m � 220 - = 4a ■ ; ® CD x k3CL0) ° ° o kCe ° ' em = ® m i � . o � m , ■ 0 =CD � s ± CD _ mG m C ° 3o-, cr § ° ° 0 � Q $ _ } _ � _ , � m � ° - _ (D - tea R & M - � � gf E a = ° cn � , = gno ne : 0CL Oca 3 � 7 - ° a ' CD] - o « e § a0 § 7 E � ; 0 _ § � § § © q q « ; § E � r0 I % § e@ ; § * § rL (D «® 3 ¢Z 2 k / � 2 \ / � 0 E0 ; a - 2 \ o \ � 0 =r (n n / $ $ G A / 0 = - = $ = 3 ; \ k \ ƒ \ \ d o ) @ 4 W . . a o CO � 0 « 0 @ 8 ;R. CD \ 0CL o E n § CD g / "W � ƒ $ ® \ CD 0 k + cn / > , > / -0E� g } \ / %j JI Y y ACQR�L .. 11/13/1996 2-. I H16 WZK I fl-IQATt- 15 i5bUhU AZI A MA I I I--K Uk-INIr- 1PROD0CMr7V6)363-1110 FAX 206)363-2044 ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE qcwogroski Insurance Associates HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR 10740 Meridian Avenue N. #210 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. Seattle, WA 98133 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE COMPANY..I Travelers. Ind Co Attn: Ext p A ......... ............................-..... . ...... ..... ...... COMPANY All For A Good Cause B SylvieMcGee ........—......-.......--............................ 12525 17th N E COMPANYC Seattle, WA 98125 ..........I.......................................... .............-........................................................................... COMPANY D 'RAG . ... .. . M% COVE 0"; ����IY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED,NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACTOR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECTTO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAYBE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECTTO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. .................................................................................................................................. ......................I....... .............................:................................................................... i POLICY EFFECTIVE.POLICY EXPIRATION: CO : TRH TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER LIMITS DATE(MMIDDNY) DATE(MMIDOrro GENERAL LIABILITY a GENERAL AGGREGATE 3 2,000,000 .............................:........................................ X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY E :PRODUCTS-COMPIOP AGG <$ 2,000,000 ............ ............. :'X OCCUR i PERSONAL&AOV INJURY CLAIMS MADE . a 000 000 :..... ................................................ .......................... A ............ 680-952W8780 11/13/1996 11/13/1997 : .$...... EACH OCCURRENCE ..$ OWNER'S&CONTRACTOR'S PROT: 1,000,000 X Employers Liabilit FIRE DAMAGE(Any we fire)... 300,000 ... ..................................................... .......................................... ... .................... MED EXP(Any we person) $ 5,000 AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY CCMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ ANY AUTO 1,000,000 .... ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY ....... SCHEDULED AUTOS (Per person) $ A :810-952W9266 11/13/1996 11/13/1997 HIRED AUTOS BODILY INJURY NON-OWNED AUTOS (Pere dent) .......... ............. .. .....— ....... ...................................................... PRCPERTYOAMAGE GARAGE LIABILITY iAUTO ONLY-EA ACCIDENT $ .............................................. ANY AUTO OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY: ........ .................. EACHACCIDENT $ .................................................... ...............................—.-................................................. AGGREGATE EXCESS LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE 5 ...................................................................................... UMBRELLA FORM :AGGREGATE 3 ...... ..... ......................... . .. . .................. OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM WORKERS COMPENSATION AND TORY LIMITS ER ........ ......... .... . EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ........z....... EL EACH ACCIDENT $ ...................................................................................... -TO THE PROPRIETOR/R1 INCL EL DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT 3 PARTNERS/EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ARE. EXCL: EL DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $ OTHER DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSILOCATlONSIVEHICLESiSPECIAL ITEMS -ertificate Holder is additional insured as regards work performed for them by the named insured during the policy term shown. CERTIFICATE ............ HOLDER: . .... ...... .............. ............ ....... .... ............ ... SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED ED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF,THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL City of Kent 10 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT. Director of Planning James P. Harris BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SKALLIMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY 220 4th Ave. S. OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY.ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. Kent, WA 98032-5895 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Jean 'Moffeft/MOFFJ ACORD 25-S (1t95) :—CACO FLD CORPORATION 19881 POLICY NUMBER: 680-952W8780 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS (FORM B) This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART. SCHEDULE Name of Person or Organization: The City of Kent, RE: Work performed for City of Kent Director of Planning, James P.Harris, 220 Fourth Avenue S, Kent,WA 98032 (If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declarations as applicable to this endorsement.) WHO IS AN INSURED(Section II) is amended to include as an insured the person or organization shown in the Schedule,but only with respect to liability arising out of your ongoing operations performed for that insured. CG 20 10 10 93 Copyright, Insurance Services Office, Inc., 1992 MEMORANDUM TO: COUNCIL PRESIDENT CHRISTI HOUSER AND COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: JIM WHITE, MAYq Z SUBJECT: ANNEXATION POLICY AND ACTION PLAN DATE: October 30, 1996 One of Council's top priorities among this year's Target Issues was "Annexation Policy and Action Plan." To that end, staff has been working on a report for your consideration. This report is attached for your review. I am submitting the report in fulfillment of your Target Issue, and stand ready to work with you as you review, revise and adopt your policy. I suggest that the report be forwarded to Council's Planning Committee for consideration and recommendation. Planning staff will work with the Committee to support its efforts. The events of the past two years have highlighted the need for this annexation policy, and I look forward to its ultimate adoption. cc: Jim Harris APPENDIXANNEXATION POLICY AND ACTION PLAN The second City Council Top Priority Target Issue for 1996 is titled Annexation Polices Action Plan. The goals to help implement this target issue are: * Review Annexation Policy and Strategy - How to Address it * Complete Pacific Highway Analysis * Monitor Meridian Valley Annexation The following report will address these goals and arrive at an array of policy options for Council action. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION 1. The City should play an active role in inducing the remainder of its Potential Annexation Area to annex to the City by the year 2007. 2. Annexations must pay their own way. 3. Potential costs of annexation should be known well in advance of any annexations. 4. The existing high levels of service shall not be diminished because of annexations. L BACKGROUND A. Annexation Policy Actions Since 1987, a number of events, concerning annexation policy, have occurred. These events include: 1. March, 1987 The WESTERN CITY BOUNDARY STUDY, prepared by the Planning Department, concluded that Kent should not deannex the area on the west side of the Pacific Highway corridor between Kent Des Moines Road and South 259th Street. 2. April 13, 1987 Planning Department Document titled GREATER KENT STUDY was presented to the City Council 3. September 4, 1987 Planning Department memo titled REVIEW OF RECOMMENDED POLICIES AND PLANNING AREA/ANNEXATION BOUNDARIES FROM THE GREATER KENT STUDY was presented to the City Council. 4. October 6, 1987 The City Council adopted Resolution 1150 which contained annexation policies and amended the 1972 Sphere of Interest document. These policies were those listed in the Planning Department memo of September 4th. 5. October 6, 1987 The City Council approved two maps pertaining to annexations. Map #1 is a 10 year annexation plan; map #2 is a 20 year annexation plan. The Council took this action at the same time that they approved Resolution 1150. However, the two maps were not approved.as exhibits for Resolution 1150; they stand alone. 6. April 19, 1988 The City Council adopted Resolution 1199 which contained an annexation priority map. This map is Exhibit A of Resolution 1199 and is titled 1989-1990 Priority Annexation Man. 7. September 1, 1992 The City Council ratified the Countywide Planning Policies which clarified the requirement mandated by the Washington State Growth Management Act that each county establish an Urban Growth Area. 8. November 3, 1992 The City Council approved Resolution 1334 which adopted an Interim Urban Growth Boundary pursuant to the Countywide Planning Policies. 9. May 18, 1993 The City Council approved Resolution 1360 which adopted an Interim Potential Annexation Area (PAA) pursuant to Resolution 1334. 10. April 4, 1995 The City Council modified the PAA boundary southerly to South 204th Street in a line extending westerly from the Green River to Orillia Road. The Council also adjusted the PAA boundary in the vicinity of South 285th Street to coincide with the Meridian Annexation boundaries. 11. April 18, 1995 The City Council approved Ordinance 3222 which adopted Kent's Comprehensive Plan as mandated by the State Growth Management Act. The Plan contains the City's Potential Annexation Area as distinguished from the earlier Interim Potential Annexation Area. 2 12. 1995 Kent signs interlocal agreements with Federal Way and Auburn defining PAA boundaries between Kent and these two cities. 13. March 5, 1996 The City Council modified the PAA boundary between Renton and Kent by moving the PAA line northerly from South 196th Street to South 192nd Street. The Council's most significant policy actions concerning annexations have been the adoption of the Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs) and their incorporation into the Comprehensive Plan and the adoption of Resolution 1150 (1987) and Resolution 1190 (1988). Many of the annexation policies contained in Resolution 1150 have been folded into the Potential Annexation Areas concept. B. Kent's Potential Annexation Area (PAA) Kent's Potential Annexation Area (PAA), contains approximately nine square miles. When these nine square miles are annexed the City will contain approximately 36 square miles. The Growth Management Act (GMA) advocates the annexation of PAAs into their adjacent cities. However, State annexation statutes still maintain citizens' rights to greatly control annexations. Consequently some areas lying within Kent's PAA could conceivably stay out of the City for a long period of time. If all of Kent's PAA was annexed today Kent's population would be approximately 90,000 persons. One important factor to be considered in compiling annexation policies is King County's Comprehensive Plan which has the following statements and goals: "1. Potential Annexation Area Plans Potential Annexation Area Plans will become the most important examples of subarea planning. These plans, which will include interlocal agreements between King County and each city, will have the following components: The city's Potential Annexation Area boundary, which includes the area the city is expected to annex within the next 20 years. The regional issues and services which King County will be responsible for after annexation. The local issues and services which the city will be responsible for upon annexation, and possibly before annexation. Strategies for the transition of responsibility for local issues and services from the County to the city. 3 A funding strategy for local and regional services. The revision of relevant community plans, policies and area zoning to comply with the County and city's comprehensive plans and to provide the basis for land use, development and other decisions by both jurisdictions. I-210 (the County Goal to implement the above statement) Following designation of Potential Annexation Areas, King County shall work with cities to establish agreements on future annexations. The County and cities should jointly develop land use policies and consistent public improvement standards. The Potential Annexation Area Plan shall be an element of the Comprehensive Plan. This process shall include participation by tribes, governmental agencies, special purpose districts, other providers, landowners and residents. The planning process may address, but is not limited to: a. Determining responsibility for upgrading facilities in Potential Annexation Areas where present facilities have been identified as insufficient, and establishing a financial partnership between County, city and other service providers to address payment of costs to build new and improve existing infrastructure; b. Providing reciprocal notification of development proposals in the Potential Annexation Areas and opportunities to propose mitigation for adverse impacts on County, city and other service providers' facilities; C. Giving cities, to the extent possible, the opportunity to be the designated sewer or water provider within the Potential Annexation Area, where this can be done without harm to the integrity of existing systems and without significantly increasing rates; d. Modifying improvement standards for County roads, parks, building design and other urban standards; e. Transferring local parks, recreation and open space sites and facilities; f. Establishing that Potential Annexation Areas are principally for urban uses; g. Making residential development density consistent with regional goals for promoting transit and efficient service delivery; h. Continuing equivalent protection of County landmarks and historic resources listed on the King County Historic Resources Inventory; i. Providing environmental protection for critical areas; and j. Identifying the major service deficiencies within Service Planning Areas and establishing a schedule for resolving them. The Potential Annexation Area agreements between King County and the cities will implement each jurisdiction's comprehensive plans and policies by identifying the responsibilities of each party. Special purpose districts will be partners within the process, helping define how services 4 can be provided most cost effectively. The costs of providing infrastructure and services should be shared to provide the most equitable and efficient services to all residents of King County. Citizens will be equal partners with the County, cities and the special service districts in the Potential Annexation Area process. I-211 King County and the cities shall collaboratively address level of service standards and costs. King County and the cities may share the costs of needed capital improvement programs and other services." Although these statements and goals have not been implemented between Kent and King County at this time, it is inevitable that King County will, in the near future, begin to advocate interlocal agreements between the City and the County for the City to take over a number of services now provided by the County. Before that point it becomes incumbent upon the City to determine if it should be providing urban services in its PAA or should actively move to annex all of its PAA. See the Appendix for copies of Resolution 1150, 1199 and a map of the Potential Annexation Areas. U. RECENT ANNEXATION ACTIVITIES The City has been quite active in pursuing annexations in recent years with the two most significant having been the Ramstead/East Hill and Meridian annexations. Other annexation have included Beck, Jones/Hobbs and Everson. The Ramstead/East Hill annexation (annexed on June 27, 1994) contained 608 acres (.95 square miles) and had a population of 1,834. At the time of annexation the estimated annual cost of service was $441,164 while the revenue was estimated to be $398,170 which left a deficit of $42,994. This annexation was small enough that it did not cause an undue impact on existing City operations or to the City's ability to maintain the same high standard of service in the annexation area as was maintained throughout the City. This annexation was predominately made up of single family residential uses with little or no commercial uses. The Meridian annexation (annexed on January 1, 1996) contained 5.27 square miles and had a population of 14,546. At the time of annexation the estimated annual expenditures were $3,744,894 while the estimated revenue was $3,664,676. The adjusted expenditure was $3,473,924 and the adjusted revenue was $3,037,315. Although the Meridian annexation contained a large number of dwellings, it also contained a good sized commercial component. This annexation had a major impact on the City's ability to provide the same high level of services in the annexed area as is maintained in the existing City. However, the revenue from annexed area provided the City with the means to cover the additional personnel needs for Police, Planning, Public Works and other departments. Although only nine months have elapsed since the annexation there has been no apparent diminishing of service levels in the Ciry because 5 of the annexation. What these two annexation tell us concerning the balance between expenditures and revenue is that for annexations not to be a burden to the City they must include a substantial commercial component and not consist of only residential uses. Two implementing goals advocated by the City Council to help implement the top priority issue were: 1. Complete Pacific Highway Analysis 2. Monitor Meridian Valley Annexation Staff has begun the Pacific Highway analysis and should have it complete in a short period of time. The Pacific Highway area, extending northerly from S.E. 272nd Street to S.E. 259th Street (extended) and easterly from Pacific Highway South to the existing City boundary, is a prime area for annexation in the near future. The Meridian Valley annexation is well under way. The Council has approved the 10 per cent petition and the annexation proponents are currently circulating the 60 per cent petitions with a turn-in date of mid-November. This area will probably be annexed sometime in 1997. III. PROPOSED ANNEXATION POLICY There is no doubt that the City will at some time annex the remaining nine square miles in the PAA. However, there are tremendous costs associated with annexing these nine square miles that dictate that the City carry out annexations in such a manner that these costs can be absorbed by the City without diminishing the high level of service provided in the existing City. Many of these costs are capital facilities related. In addition to the capital facility needs are the on going general fund operations including personnel to handle the increase in fire, police, planning, public works and others City operations expected to be generated in the newly annexed areas. These costs would add to dollars to the City's general fund, a budget that derives its funds primarily from property and retail sales taxes. The City has the recent experience from the Meridian annexation from which to draw conclusions for future similar annexations. There are approximately 6 square miles of area remaining in the PAA north of S.E. 240th Street northerly to S.E. 192nd Street. This area contains approximately 24,000 persons (the Meridian annexation contained 5.2 square miles and just over 14,000 persons) and is similar to the Meridian annexation with its land use of primarily single family residential. There is a large commercial node at the intersection of 108th Avenue S.E. and S.E. 208th Street, much larger than a similar commercial node at the intersection of 6 Kent Kangely Road and 132nd Avenue S.E. in the Meridian annexation. With the experience gained from the Meridian annexation, it is important to include a commercial component with any annexation that will have a large area residential land use. It is the commercial tax base that will permit the City to provide services on the same high level in the annexed areas as is provided in the existing City while not diminishing the exiting City level of service. One final urbanized area remaining in the PAA is the approximately 1.25 square mile area lying on the east side of Pacific Highway South and extending northerly from South 272nd Street to South 259th Street (extended). This area's land use is primarily commercial with some multifamily residential. Most of the remainder of the PAA consist of the large area west of Smith Brother's Dairy north of South 272nd Street and west of West Valley Highway. This is primarily an area of undevelopable land and will likely remain in agricultural and flood storage use. The following annexation policies are proposed to enable the City to consider annexing the remainder of the PAA: 1. The City's goal is to annex the remainder of Kent's Potential Annexation Area (PAA) by the year 2007. 2. The City should conduct a vigorous annexation program. 3. The annexations shall be paced so that their impacts can be absorbed prior to beginning additional annexations. 4. All areas of the PAA shall have an equal priority for annexing to the City, but only one annexation shall take place at a time. There shall be a lag between annexations to give the City time to absorb the annexed area into the City's operations. 5. The City shall identify citizens living in the PAA area who can help facilitate annexations. 6. The City shall identify those capital facility impacts associated with an annexation and shall determine their costs and the time line to accomplish them well before the annexation takes place. 7. The City shall identify, to the extent possible, the general fund costs associated with annexations. 8. The Goals and policies contained in Kent's Growth Management Comprehensive Plan shall be followed as they pertain to annexations. 7 9. Levels of service in the existing City shall not be diminished because of new annexations. 10. Annexations shall pay their own way; annexations shall include a commercial component and not primarily consist of residential uses. 11. The City shall require all development within the PAA that desires City utilities to sign no-protest agreements and agreements to development in conformance with Kent's Comprehensive Plan designation and to Kent Public Works standards. 12. The City shall not initiate Comprehensive Plan amendment and zoning amendment hearings until the City Council adopts an annexation ordinance. 13. After the City Council adopts an annexation ordinance, the actual date the annexation takes place should coincide with the availability of revenue to be received by the City for the annexed area. 14. The preferred method of annexation is through the property owner petition method. 15. Annexations shall only be considered if they are of sufficient size or population that will make the annexation both financially feasible and will allow efficient and effective extension of City services. 8 APPENDIX • t'E§'MIPP �.� k �+''� a�`�4'�i�`1'-s�r �', "-;a ��se�b�✓t-�r�`s��xK"",�Gl�'r.'��wi�.,� ��nxc�D�� -n2°s� s i 5 � 5 rb �f. `9' ` -.^. o cY }� s yet.: i i•. - r�'.ri LWA 'T �x 'Yr• 3 SS 4 � 1 �•Y., 1 r a'h � S ,� ti 1 ae ZZpp\.e� �YT ?f.. sit h »Y �..`\ �nDv ti`I;� � 3�!+i•1„+,yr,+'ien �c +�IK�Y.st�s j1'v�b 1'^ a_ MyFt� e'y�. ���wtl r IY yr, � :r M;,-� � mil• ` � r a f L � rrII c w Y {� fr - .mdy ! •3 \\s '�' 6xx6,,e�ll�'h'Jirt n��1�Pli� Syll(RCCCf J \\'➢1F 1 ... Y��T ��;.�.tF.Zi 7 1 15 r(1�-� ,�, w+�` 1.-C � �, ■ 4�.ha�.� ���-'� lilGr rr d r[y t f " FIE e��j.�•i�.r�G�lpIY�Av� co a/'.'y ,f. '�'ki11 )i.ruy �.R�CF++Ail��l✓ 1� w1 i_8_l�/ f5P�7�F1L'"'is'�City ..,, �,,q���� 1'y M "' ,Y � �5�.�ePW*�T+gyR��T��;"•,jp.&.s�.�:v�F�!� � �'� � 1 Iva "�Ialw• ���3 "�'•'.y,' >•u..�.e �j�.`�yr,�%�MGw. IIID�'�:H".° � F tl RESOLUTION NO. // f5D A RESOLUTION of the City cf Kent, Washington, adopting Annexation. Policies and amending the Kent Sphere of Inmerest adopted April 17, 1972. - WHEREAS, on April 17, 1972, the City Council of the City of Kent, by Resolution 718 A, adopted a report entitled 'Kent's Sphere of Interest", and adopted amendments to such report on December 4, 1978 and December 19, 1983; and WHEREAS, the growth patterns of the City of Kent since 1972 and the future growth potential of the City require the Sphere of Interest to be reevaluated and revised; and WHEREAS, the City of Kent desires to achieve the effective management of impacts associated with new development, the efficient provision of needed levels of city service, the coordinated preparation of land use, functional and capital improvement plans, and the delineation of appropriate potential annexation areas; and WHEREAS, the City of Kent recocnizes that planning and land use decisions can have extra-jurisdictional impacts and that governmental cooperation is an effective manner under existing law to address impacts and opportunities which spread across . jurisdictional boundaries; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Kent reviewed the new annexation policies in workshop meetings on April 14, 1987 and September 4, 1987; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council adopts the following Annexation Policies amending the present Kent Sphere of Interest: Annexation Policies - General (G) Gl The rights and privileges of Kent's citizens shall be protected when considering areas for annexation. a G2 The City shall identify potential code violation problems and nonconforming development prior to annexation. G3 The City shall ensure that the property owners and residents are fully informed of the obligations and requirements that may be imposed (bonded indebtedness or cost of services) . G4 The City shall review annexations and future City boundaries with special districts to determine impacts of annexation on their services. GS The City shall promote a positive image and an accurate portrayal of available services to encourage public support and desire for annexations. This analysis shall include participation from each City department to identify impacts and associated costs of delivery of services to the proposed area. G8 The City should work with other cities and King County to identify future annexation areas; to sign interlocal agreements to ensure consistent land use policies and public improvement standards within the agreed-upon . annexation areas. G9 The City shall promote annexations that will solve the problem of disjointed provision of public service (such as police protection) . Boundaries/Land Use (LU) LU1 Annexations shall be promoted that serve to square off the City boundaries, particularly if they are consistent with the Potential Annexation Area map. LU2 Existing residential areas adjacent to the City, with City water and/or sewer service, should have a high priority for annexation. 2 - LU3 Annexation boundaries should follow logical physical features while at the same time follow established property lines. LU4 Annexations shall occur only if the area is contiguous to the existing City boundary with the exception of annexations for municipal purposes. LU5 Areas proposed for annexation should exceed five acres in size unless a smaller area would serve to straighten a boundary or eliminate an island of unincorporated land. LU6 Special service district boundaries must be considered when determining annexation areas and future City boundaries. LU7 Proposed zoning and sensitive areas designations for annexation areas shall be consistent with the applicable subarea land use plan and the City-wide comprehensive plan; PROVIDED, that the City may withhold full implementation of the comprehensive land use plan map designations in its annexation zoning proposals in order to achieve a more orderly physical development pattern and to implement its goal of a 20 percent density reduction in multifamily residential areas. LUB The City shall not initiate zoning hearings for annexed lands until the annexation ordinance has been adopted by Council. Utilities/Streets (U) U1 The City shall continue to require all development in unincorporated King County that desires City utilities to sign no-protest annexation agreements and agreements to develop in accordance with the comprehensive plan designation and to Kent Public Works standards. U2 New utility service should be a higher priority for unserved areas in the City. - 3 - U3 A report shall be developed that identifies the condition of streets and utilities within a proposed annexation area and determines needed improvements and long-term maintenance costs. U4 The City shall require that all necessary street and utility improvements be made with the assistance of residents/property owners within the annexation area. Passed at a regular mee ing of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington this 4 day of 1987. Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, this day of 1987. DAN KELL`EHER, MAYOR ATTEST: MARIE JEN32N, CITY CLERK APPR VED TO FORM: SA A DRISCOLL, Y ATTORNEY I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. // 15'0 , passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, the day of , 1987. (SEAL) MARIE aENSEN, CITY CLERK 05220-170 4 - RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, adopting a priority annexation map. WHEREAS, on April 17, 1972, the City Council of the City of Kent, by Resolution 718 A, adopted a report entitled "Kent's Sphere of Interest", and adopted amendments to such report on December 4, 1978 and December 19, 1983; and WHEREAS, the growth patterns of the City of Kent since 1972 and the future growth potential of the City require the Sphere of Interest to be reevaluated and revised; and WHEREAS, the City of Kent desires to achieve the effective management of impacts' associated with new development, the efficient provision of needed levels of city service, the coordinated preparation of land use, functional and capital improvement plans, and the delineation of appropriate potential annexation areas; and I WHEREAS, the City of Kent recognizes that planning and land use decisions can have extra-jurisdictional impacts and that governmental cooperation is an effective manner under existing law to address impacts and opportunities which spread across jurisdictional boundaries; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Kent adopted new annexation policies per Resolution #1150 establishing 10 and 20 year potential annexation areas; and WHEREAS, in November of 1988, the City Council Planning Committee reviewed the Priority Annexation Map and recommended approval with some revisions; and WHEREAS, on January 7, 1989, the City Council reviewed the Priority Annexation Map at their annual retreat; and WHEREAS, the City Council Planning Committee reviewed and approved the revised 1989-1990 Annexation Action Plan in March of 1989; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council adopts the 1989-1990 Priority Annexation Map as attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. Passed at a regular neeing of the it Council of the City of Kent, Washington this day of 1989. �IConcurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, this 19 day of 1989. DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR ATTEST: MARIE JEI� Ef}, CITY C RK APPRO D AS. TO FORM: SANDFA DRISCOLL, CITY ATTORNEY I hereby certify that this is a true and correct cony of Resolution No. // , passed by the /City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, the ___Z__�'day of if , 1989. (SEAL) MARIE JENq�; CITY CLERK r 7170-250 2 - I i � ` I � z s F m a r as d < r f cc i W M M ! ' w w J1 I. - -mob !(.^.j >� -(,�a- __y�., - : -,.'✓ '� ; _�^ Fit �" — _ � I � f rt rr�, r+ .�,/I� yr. �. � w �• � JIs f f W .A �. r��=� - � �d I' I � y �- .�,,. # Isla! •- , - I II 1 �y 71I rr rIII �-_. i. .. i'- 17 ` l — •r -IVY I I ■ ) -fir l+ 1 1., I, � I�{'�i 11 J�l�lr 1 .�.I " L I•• `J �� ' �_�- �+�. L� i_Y � 0 i r M w y,•„_y _ i I IIVI^ ! Sl'!''� I� I •�' n '