HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Committees - Planning and Economic Development Committee - 09/03/1991 (4) CITY OF
CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE
September 3 , 1991 4 :45 PM
Committee Members Present City Attorney's Office
Christie Houser Roger Lubovich
Jon Johnson, Chair Carol Morris
Leona Orr
Planning Staff Guests
Laurie Anderson Paul Morford
Lin Ball
Sharon Clamp
Margaret Porter
Fred Satterstrom
Alice Shobe
GROWTH MANAGEMENT UPDATE (L. Anderson)
Senior Planner Lauri Anderson reported an extension has been
received from the State of Washington for the designation and
regulation of resource lands and critical areas. The new deadline
is March 1, 1992 . A hearing will be held before the Planning
Commission in November.
The public participation program is moving forward. Within the
next month the City Council and other decision makers will be
invited to a workshop to exchange ideas and obtain feedback on how
this process will occur.
The mid-level managers group has completed assignments of all the
tasks required by the Growth Management Act. The departments have
taken on various responsibilities for those tasks. At their next
meeting the mid-level managers will set a timeline for task
completion. Then the proposal will be ready for presentation to
the Mayor and the Council.
The Impact Fee Committee has ended its first phase in determining
overall policy direction for the impact fee ordinances. They will
be looking at sample ordinances and ordinances for each of the four
impact fee areas: transportation, parks, fire, and schools.
1992 PROPOSED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM (CDBG)
(A. Shobe)
Planner Alice Shobe reported that the 1992 proposed Community
Development Block Grant entitlement is estimated to be $225, 180.
•
CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 31 1991
PAGE 2
The 1992 CDBG program has not changed significantly from 1991.
Program planning and administration funds have been limited to
$916, a decrease from 1991, in order to maximize funding available,
and primary support to the City's Home Repair Services Program is
being continued. Ms. Shobe briefly described each program and the
recommended funding levels.
The Human Services Commission recommended funding human services
projects presented in staff' s proposal.
Ms. Shobe also explained the contingency plan which King County has
requested be adopted to address potential entitlement changes
resulting from the federal budget adoption.
Councilmember Orr MOVED and Councilmember Houser SECONDED a motion
to recommend adoption of the Block Grant Program as presented.
Motion carried.
EXTENSION OF UTILITY SERVICES RESOLUTION (F Satterstrom)
Planning Manager Fred Satterstrom stated that Resolution 1275,
dealing with a moratorium on the extension of water and sewer
services outside the boundaries of Kent for purposes of
development, has been amended in the new proposed resolution
included in the council packet. The new resolution adds three
limiting circumstances under which water and sewer services would
be extended outside of the City limits if all three conditions are
met.
Senior Planner Lauri Anderson presented a map of the zoning
information the Committee requested on this issue.
Mr. Satterstrom stated the Public Works Committee recommended the
amended resolution be placed on tonight' s City Council agenda
without a recommendation. Councilmember Orr added that since the
Public Works Committee could not agree on the proposed amendment,
she suggested the matter be brought to the Planning Committee for
discussion. At today' s Public Works Committee meeting, they
discussed other ways to limit water and sewer extensions. They are
concerned because of the Sea Tac issue which has come up. Council-
member Orr' s concern is if the Council approves each individual
application based on the criteria in the amended resolution, then
applications for water and sewer service will be granted with no
potential for annexation.
Chair Johnson suggested adding wording to Section C of the amended
resolution. Strike all wording after "further" and add, "no
application shall be approved nor permit issued for water and sewer
service until the area is actually annexed to the City" .
Mr. Johnson' s concern is that someone could submit a 10 percent
annexation application and receive approval. Applicants could then
CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
PAGE 3
get water and sewer service approved but never annex into the City.
This would defeat the whole purpose behind the original resolution,
which is if water and sewer service is extended to properties,
those properties should be annexed to the City.
Councilmember Orr stated the original resolution is only in effect
until the County establishes the urban growth boundaries. Lauri
Anderson added the interim urban growth boundaries have already
been established. The County cannot establish the urban growth
boundaries until all the individual jurisdictions have done land
capacity analyses to see how much room they have within their city
boundaries. The County is meeting this week and hopes to have
figures on vacant land. The next step is to look at underdeveloped
land. The urban growth group' s target date to resolve this issue
is December 1991 but may take longer due to the complexity and
political nature of the redevelopment issue.
Paul Morford talked about church property owners on 120 Avenue SE
and South 240 Street which are also interested in obtaining City
water and sewer in order to expand their facility. He owns
property abutting the church and also has an interest in extending
City water and sewer to that area. Several of the church members
will attend tonight' s City Council meeting.
Councilmember Orr stated that the City should at least have council
support for an annexation before granting extension of services.
Chair Johnson is concerned about extending services to
unincorporated areas because it will be very difficult to annex
them to the City once they have services.
Assistant City Attorney Morris stated according to the statute the
City does not have to provide services outside of its boundaries.
However, when services are provided, it cannot be done arbitrarily.
Councilmember Houser MOVED and Councilmember Orr SECONDED not to
adopt the amended resolution. Motion Carried.
ADDED ITEMS
SEA TAC BOUNDARIES (F Satterstrom)
Planning Manager Satterstrom stated at the Planning Committee's
August 20 meeting, Planning Director Harris presented a proposed
annexation by the City of Sea Tac of 350 acres which lie outside of
Sea Tact Kent and Tukwila. Mr. Satterstrom stated that the matter
had been taken to the Administration' s Annexation Committee for a
recommendation on the boundary lines. Lauri Anderson attended the
Annexation Committee meeting last Wednesday and indicated the
Committee recommended the boundary be set at the crest of the hill
rather than extending all the way up to I-5. The Annexation
Committee proposed to leave out the strip along Military Road due
CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 31 1991
PAGE 4
to the difficulty of serving that area from the Fire Department' s
standpoint. That area would more easily be served by Sea Tac, and
in this way the hillside would be brought into the City.
Councilmember Houser questioned why the Kent Fire Department would
have trouble serving Military Road. Lauri Anderson indicated she
would obtain more information on fire service to the Military Road
area from Mary Berg.
KING COUNTY METRO MERGER
Chair Johnson asked if the Committee would like to take a stand on
the King County Metro Merger. The proposal will be on the November
ballot. Chair Johnson recommends the Committee favor the merger
because it' s been mandated by the courts that something happen, and
if it is voted down, King County, City of Seattle, and City of Kent
will have to renegotiate before the deadline in 1992 or the judge
will decide.
Chair Johnson suggested this be brought to the next Planning
Committee meeting for action. He hopes to arrange for someone who
has been working on it to brief the Committee on the pros and cons
of the issue.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 5:45 p.m.